The URL can be used to link to this page

2023 10 10 PCt(V Qal I GEM oftbe D SE T — Planning Commission agendas and staff reports are now available on the City's web page: www.laquintaca.gov PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta TUESDAY, OCTOBER 10, 2023, AT 5:00 P.M. ****************************** Members of the public may listen to this meeting by tuning -in live via http://Iaguinta.12milesout.com/video/live. CALL TO ORDER Roll Call: Commissioners Caldwell, Guerrero, Hassett, Hernandez, McCune, Tyerman, and Chairperson Nieto. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the Commission on any matter not listed on the agenda pursuant to the "Public Comments — Instructions" listed at the end of the agenda. The Commission values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - NONE CONSENT CALENDAR PAGE 1. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 27, 2023 2. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES OF AUGUST 22, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Page 1 of 5 OCTOBER 10, 2023 BUSINESS SESSION PAGE APPROVE CANCELLATION OF REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 28 AND DECEMBER 26, 2023 STUDY SESSION — NONE PUBLIC HEARINGS — 5:00 p.m. or thereafter For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Commission Secretary prior to consideration of that item; comments are limited to three (3) minutes (approximately 350 words). Any person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission prior to the public hearing and/or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the project(s) at the time of the public hearing. If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. PAGE ADOPT RESOLUTIONS RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE CHANGES TO THE LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PROJECT; CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CONSISTENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 2. ADOPT RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2023-1000 FOR ZONING CODE LANGUAGE CLEAN UP AND CHANGES TO GAME COURT, FLAGPOLE AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) REGULATIONS; CEQA: THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061 (b)(3), COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION. LOCATION: CITY- WIDE STAFF ITEMS — NONE COMMISSIONERS' ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission will be held on October 24, 2023, commencing at 5:00 p.m. at the La Quinta City Hall Council Chamber, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Page 2 of 5 OCTOBER 10, 2023 DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Tania Flores, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the Commission meeting of October 10, 2023, was posted on the City's website, near the entrance to the Council Chamber at 78495 Calle Tampico and the bulletin board at 51321 Avenida Bermudas, on October 5, 2023. DATED: October 5, 2023 44.— Tania Flores, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California Public Notices Agenda packet materials are available for public inspection: 1) at the Clerk's Office at La Quinta City Hall, located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253; and 2) on the City's website at https://www.laguintaca.gov/business/boards-and- commissions/planning-commission, in accordance with the Brown Act [Government Code § 54957.5; AB 2647 (Stats. 2022, Ch. 971)]. • The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please contact Commission Secretary at (760) 777-7023, 24 -hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If background material is to be presented to the Commission during a Commission meeting, please be advised that 15 copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the Commission Secretary for distribution. It is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS — INSTRUCTIONS Members of the public may address the Commission on any matter listed or not listed on the agenda as follows: WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided either in-person during the meeting by submitting 15 copies to the Commission Secretary, it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting; or can be emailed in advance to TFloresCcDLaQuintaCA.gov, no later than 12:00 p.m., on the day of the meeting. Written public comments will be distributed to the Commission, made public, and will be incorporated into the public record of the meeting, but will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Chair, a brief summary of public comments is asked to be reported. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Page 3 of 5 OCTOBER 10, 2023 If written public comments are emailed, the email subject line must clearly state "Written Comments" and should include: 1) full name, 2) city of residence, and 3) subject matter. VERBAL PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided in-person during the meeting by completing a "Request to Speak" form and submitting it to the Commission Secretary; it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). Members of the public shall be called upon to speak by the Commission Secretary. In accordance with City Council Resolution No. 2022-028, a one-time additional speaker time donation of three (3) minutes per individual is permitted; please note that the member of the public donating time must: 1) submit this in writing to the Commission Secretary by completing a "Request to Speak" form noting the name of the person to whom time is being donated to, and 2) be present at the time the speaker provides verbal comments. Verbal public comments are defined as comments provided in the speakers' own voice and may not include video or sound recordings of the speaker or of other individuals or entities, unless permitted by the Chair. Public speakers may elect to use printed presentation materials to aid their comments; 15 copies of such printed materials shall be provided to the Commission Secretary to be disseminated to the Commission, made public, and incorporated into the public record of the meeting; it is requested that the printed materials are provided prior to the beginning of the meeting. There shall be no use of Chamber resources and technology to display visual or audible presentations during public comments, unless permitted by the Chair. All writings or documents, including but not limited to emails and attachments to emails, submitted to the City regarding any item(s) listed or not listed on this agenda are public records. All information in such writings and documents is subject to disclosure as being in the public domain and subject to search and review by electronic means, including but not limited to the City's Internet Web site and any other Internet Web -based platform or other Web -based form of communication. All information in such writings and documents similarly is subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act [Government Code § 7920.000 et seq.]. TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY — INSTRUCTIONS Teleconference accessibility may be triggered in accordance with AB 2449 (Stats. 2022, Ch. 285), codified in the Brown Act [Government Code § 549531, if a member of the Commission requests to attend and participate in this meeting remotely due to `just cause" or "emergency circumstances, " as defined, and only if the request is approved. In such instances, remote public accessibility and participation will be facilitated via Zoom Webinar as detailed at the end of this Agenda. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Page 4 of 5 OCTOBER 10, 2023 *** TELECONFERENCE PROCEDURES — PURSUANT TO AB 2449*** APPLICABLE ONLY WHEN TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY IS IN EFFECT Verbal public comments via Teleconference — members of the public may attend and participate in this meeting by teleconference via Zoom and use the "raise your hand" feature when public comments are prompted by the Chair; the City will facilitate the ability for a member of the public to be audible to the Commission and general public and allow him/her/they to speak on the item(s) requested. Please note — members of the public must unmute themselves when prompted upon being recognized by the Chair, in order to become audible to the Commission and the public. Only one person at a time may speak by teleconference and only after being recognized by the Chair. ZOOM LINK: https://us06web.zoom.us/m/82853067939 Meeting ID: 828 5306 7939 Or join by phone: (253) 215 —8782 Written public comments — can be provided in person during the meeting or emailed to TFlores LaQuintaCA.gov any time prior to the adjournment of the meeting, and will be distributed to the Commission, made public, incorporated into the public record of the meeting, and will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Chair, a brief summary of any public comment is asked to be read, to the extent the Committee can accommodate such request. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA Page 5 of 5 OCTOBER 10, 2023 CALL TO ORDER CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, JUNE 27, 2023 A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission (Commission) was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Chairperson Currie. PRESENT: Commissioners Guerrero, Hassett, McCune, Nieto, Tyerman, and Chairperson Currie ABSENT: Commissioner Caldwell STAFF PRESENT: Design & Development Director Danny Castro, Public Works Director/City Engineer Bryan McKinney, Planning Manager Cheri L. Flores, Associate Planner Siji Fernandez, Commission Secretary Tania Flores, and City Attorney Bill Ihrke. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Hassett led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA — None. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Hassett/Tyerman to confirm the Agenda as published. Motion passed unanimously. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION — None. CONSENT CALENDAR —None. STUDY SESSION — None. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. CONTINUED FROM MARCH 28, 2023 — CONSIDER RESOLUTIONS RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 FOR A 252 -UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT, LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS; CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (EA2022-0001) PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 1 of 7 JUNE 27, 2023 CONSISTENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 COMMISSIONER NIETO RECUSED HIMSELF FROM DISCUSSION AND VOTE ON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1, DUE TO A POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST STEMMING FROM A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP, AS THE ALTUM GROUP, A CONSULTANT FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT, IS HIS EMPLOYER; AND WAS EXCUSED FROM THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING AS THIS WAS THE ONLY ITEM FOR COMMISSION CONSIDERATION ON THE AGENDA; COMMISSIONER NIETO LEFT THE MEETING AT 5:04 P.M. DECLARATIONS REGARDING COMMISSION PUBLIC CONTACT — Commissioner McCune said he met with the applicant, at a private residence, regarding an unrelated project in which he did not have any contractual or financial obligations to the applicant. Commissioner Tyerman reported that he attended a public community meeting regarding the project. Planning Manager Flores presented the staff report which is on file in the Design and Development Department. City Attorney Ihrke provided information regarding California Law and La Quinta Municipal Code procedures and processes for land use applications; cited information from City Council Resolution 2022-028 relating to rules and decorum for public meetings. Staff answered questions regarding the various traffic concerns including the analysis at Moon River Drive and current deficiency at that intersection, original traffic study compared to recent analysis, pedestrian and bicyclist activity analyses, line -of -sight at exit from development, traffic pattern changes and additional U-turn analysis, use of raised medians to prevent illegal turns into development, and special event traffic congestion; maximum structure height at image corridor, line -of -sight to 3 -story buildings for existing neighbors, and undergrounding of existing power lines and poles; original Environmental Assessment compared to currently proposed project, noise levels, standards, and mapping, re -allocation of low- and very -low income housing, and density bonus standards; roadway improvements including widening, sidewalks, and bicycle lanes; and school capacity and availability. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Applicant, Greg Irwin, Partner and Principal of Irwin Partners Architects, introduced himself, presented a video rendering of the proposed development, and provided a brief overview of the changes made from previous presentation, including the quantity and location of 3 -story buildings, a reduction in market -rate units and increase in moderate -income units, and removal of Zone Change request; increased parking and addition of parking regulations using permits and security monitoring, and valet and shuttle service for special events; updated desert style architectural features and color palettes and the addition of a "tot lot" playground area. He outlined off-site improvements, including upgrades to the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) Marshal Substation, Avenue 50 road widening and addition of sidewalk and bicycle lanes, and deceleration lanes and bus PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 2 of 7 JUNE 27, 2023 III turnout and shelter relocation. Mr. Irwin answered Commission questions regarding perimeter fencing, onsite management and security, and elevator requirements; parking regulations and enforcement and garage counts, uses, Americans with Disability Act (ADA) accessibility, locations, setbacks, landscaping, and elevations; communications with IID regarding upgrades to the Marshal Substation and current capacity and shortages, undergrounding existing power lines and poles, and electric vehicle charging stations; tot lot playground equipment and retention basin location and landscaping; and affordable housing requirements and stated that the units were not intended for short- term vacation rentals. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Applicant's Traffic Engineer, George Ghossain, Principal Engineer at Integrated Engineering Group, provided information and answered Commission questions regarding current and proposed traffic patterns and the ability to modify signals based on needs; and traffic analysis including trip generation, anticipated U-turns, and ingress and egress from the development. Public Works Director/City Engineer McKinney confirmed the City's Traffic Engineering Consultant reviewed the traffic analysis prepared by the Applicant and agreed with the results and methodology used for reporting; answered questions regarding planned medians near the development entrances on Washington Street and Avenue 50; and highlighted other projects with similar traffic patterns. CHAIRPERSON CURRIE CALLED FOR A BRIEF RECESS AT 6:40 P.M. CHAIRPERSON CURRIE RECONVENED AT 6:59 P.M. WITH COMMISSIONERS TYERMAN PRESENT THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING GUERRERO, HASSETT, McCUNE, AND Commission Secretary Flores reported that 32 letters in opposition to the project were received after the publication of the agenda which were forwarded to the Planning Commission and would be included in the final agenda packet record of the meeting; two letters in opposition to the project were received after the deadline for public comment and would also be included in the final agenda packet record of the meeting; 13 written comments in opposition were submitted at the meeting, but had declined to speak, and would be included in the final record of the meeting. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Richard Gray, La Quinta — opposed the project due to safety concerns with pickleball court location; traffic safety impacts; lack of pedestrian doors on the garages, electric vehicle charging and solar panels, and elevators for 3 -story buildings; and rainwater surface drainage not diverting to the Whitewater wash. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Thomas Emison, La Quinta (received donated time from Kolby Emison) — opposed the project due to reduced setbacks and building height for garages located at the North side; and traffic patterns and vehicle safety. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 3 of 7 JUNE 27, 2023 E:3 PUBLIC SPEAKER: Angie Lafferty, La Quinta — opposed the project due to traffic patterns and vehicle safety; increased light pollution; additional service and commercial vehicles creating increased carbon and pollution; local weather being too hot for public transit shelters with no tree cover; negative impact to views; the development's heat island effect; lack of water conservation and electrical grid impacts; and lack of elevators for 3 - story buildings. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Robert Lang, La Quinta — opposed the project due to density increase; affordable housing component creating risk of increased crime; the project's inconsistency with surrounding communities; and the general disapproval of residents from the neighboring communities. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Kristen Dolan, La Quinta — opposed the project due to inconsistency with community; undesirable architecture; 3 -story building heights; lack of story poles for residents to have visual representations; unknown IID substation funding; possibility of overflow parking leaking into north neighborhood; expressed lack of confidence in the developer and stated that the project's website was never fully developed; traffic safety concerns; and lack of elevators for ADA and emergency medical aid. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Joseph Scaccia, La Quinta — opposed the project due to traffic patterns and safety concerns at U-turn at Avenue 50/Moon River Drive and Washington Street/Avenue 50 intersections; entrances requiring key card causing stacking concerns; need for additional roadway improvements including raised medians and deceleration lanes; light and noise pollution; 3 -story buildings being inconsistent with neighboring communities; and the Developer's questionable reputation, Better Business Bureau accreditation, and history of development in Oregon. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Keith Meyer, President of Duna La Quinta Homeowners Association and La Quinta resident — stated he is also a Registered Traffic Engineer and opposed the project due vitality, safety, and cohesiveness to the existing community; project site not being a good location for auto intensive or transit dependent development with lack of nearby employment opportunities and infrequent bus transit; development ingress and egress causing U-turns at disallowed locations; traffic study missing times of analysis and bicycle and pedestrian analysis; and use of density bonus to exceed the City's maximum density for this zone. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Brian Flath, La Quinta — opposed the project due to negative visuals, sounds, and smells of apartment living; reduced setbacks and location of garbage receptacles; landscaping between garages and walls; ADA elevator requirements not being met; traffic pattern adjustments would be needed at Washington Street and Sagebrush Avenue due to increased traffic. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Brian Thomas, La Quinta — opposed the project due to traffic safety concerns at Washington Street entrance; garage height at north wall; lack of general community support and outreach; and school zone safety and increased U-turn activity. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 4 of 7 JUNE 27, 2023 4 PUBLIC SPEAKER: Kevin White, La Quinta — opposed to the project due to architectural inconsistency with surrounding community; negative traffic impacts; school safety concerns; building heights; lack of elevators; and general lack of community support. PUBLIC SPEAKER: George Christopher, former IID Energy Consumers Advisory Committee representative and La Quinta resident — expressed support for the project due to IID Marshall Substation improvements; cited locations of other local developments with 3 -story buildings and modern design architecture; complimented the Commission and staff for providing community access to information; and stated that all developments would increase traffic, but that development is needed. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Dante Gomez, President of Parc La Quinta Homeowners Association and La Quinta resident (received donated time from Elisa Martin) — introduced his daughters, Sasha (not present) and Penelope who are students at La Quinta Middle School which is nearby the proposed development; opposed the project due to lack of community notification and outreach by the developer and City Staff; negative impacts to quality of life of surrounding residents; building heights; traffic impacts; development aesthetics; lack of parking; pedestrian, bicycle, and child safety concerns; lack of elevators; overcrowding of neighboring elementary and middle schools; current and increased parking and traffic issues; and apartment units not being desirable at the proposed pricing. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Bill Walker, former Riverside County Sheriff's Department and La Quinta resident — opposed the project due to building stories and heights; higher density apartment complex being inconsistent with neighboring communities; low-income and government housing requiring increased emergency and police services; lack of Sheriff's Department impact statement; and traffic patterns and crime and safety concerns. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Ana Esquivel, La Quinta — opposed the project due to traffic safety concerns; requested speed limit study at project site; ADA elevator requirements; affordable housing component relocation; lack of sufficient parking for guests; and garage and storage space concerns. Applicant answered public concerns regarding ADA unit counts, assigned parking and elevator requirements; garage locations, dimensions and heights; solar panel installment; comparisons with previously approved project entitlements; IID Marshal Substation upgrades; government and Section 8 housing accessibility; traffic patterns and analysis; noise and lighting code compliance; building code compliance and building permit processes; stacking at entrances; U-turn analysis; Sheriff's project review; pedestrian access for garage doors; CHAIRPERSON CURRIE DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 8:13 P.M. Commission discussion and comments followed regarding accommodations and changes made by the developer to comply with direction received by the Commission; traffic and school zone safety; U-turn access at major cross streets; addition of raised PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 5 of 7 JUNE 27, 2023 10 medians to prevent illegal lane crossings and entrances; density, inconsistency, and negative impacts to surrounding communities; strain on city services and utilities; pollution and decrease of urban open space and lack of value to the City; garages and setbacks; future city planning and development; housing needs; and zone compatibility. City Attorney Ihrke provided a breakdown of the items for consideration and vote, and the process and requirements for the motions presented. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Guerrero/Hassett to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2022-013, to recommend City Council adopt a Mitigated Negative Declaration for Environmental Assessment 2022-0001, as recommended: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A 252 -UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2022-0001 APPLICANT: IRWIN PARTNERS Motion passed: ayes — 4, noes — 1 (Currie), absent — 2 (Caldwell, Nieto), abstain — 0. MOTION —A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Hassett/ McCune adopt a Planning Commission Resolution to recommend City Council approve GPA2022-0002, SP2022-0001 (SP2004-071, Amendment 2), and SDP2022-0001, as recommended: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF A 252 -UNIT APARTMENT PROJECT LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 CASE NUMBERS: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0002; SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, AMENDMENT 2); SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 APPLICANT: IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS Motion failed due to lack of majority vote of total Planning Commission membership (motion required a minimum of four affirmatives votes): ayes — 3, noes — 2 (Currie, Tyerman), absent — 2 (Caldwell, Nieto), abstain — 0. CITY ATTORNEY IHRKE REQUESTED A BRIEF RECESS TO DISCUSS POSSIBLE NEXT STEPS FOR THIS ITEM. CHAIRPERSON CURRIE CALLED FOR A BRIEF RECESS AT 8:30 P.M. CHAIRPERSON CURRIE RECONVENED THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING AT 8:32 P.M. WITH COMMISSIONERS GUERRERO, HASSETT, McCUNE, AND TYERMAN PRESENT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 6 of 7 JUNE 27, 2023 11 City Attorney Ihrke provided an explanation of the results of the vote and the operations of law requiring the item to move forward to Council with the minutes to reflect the outcome of the vote for recommendation of approval of the MND but no recommendation for the General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, or Site Development Plan. STAFF ITEMS Planning Manager Flores announced Chairperson Currie's retirement from the Commission, thanked her for her service, and wished her well in future endeavors; and announced the planned Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission regarding the Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan tentatively scheduled for July 19, 2023. COMMISSIONER ITEMS — None. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Hassett/Tyerman to adjourn at 8:35 p.m. Motion passed: ayes — 5, noes — 0, absent — 2 (Caldwell, Nieto), abstain — 0. Respectfully submitted, TANIA FLORES, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 7 of 7 JUNE 27, 2023 12 CALL TO ORDER CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, AUGUST 22, 2023 A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission (Commission) was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Vice Chairperson McCune. PRESENT: Commissioners Guerrero, Hassett, Hernandez, Nieto, Tyerman, and Vice Chairperson McCune ABSENT: Commissioner Caldwell STAFF PRESENT: Design & Development Director Danny Castro, Planning Manager Cheri L. Flores, and Commission Secretary Tania Flores PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Hassett led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA — None. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Hassett/Guerrero to confirm the Agenda as published. Motion passed: ayes — 6, noes — 0, absent — 1 (Caldwell), abstain — 0. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATION 1. WELCOME NEWLY APPOINTED COMMISSIONER HERNANDEZ Vice Chairperson McCune introduced and welcomed newly appointed Commissioner Hernandez who provided a brief summary of his experience and qualifications. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE MEETING MINUTES OF JUNE 13, 2023 MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Guererro/Hassett to approve the Consent Calendar as published. Motion passed: ayes — 5, noes — 0, absent — 1 (Caldwell), abstain — 1 (Hernandez). PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 1 of 6 AUGUST 22, 2023 13 Commissioner Hernandez abstained from voting on the Consent Calendar due to not being appointed to the Commission or present for the meeting for which the minutes were drafted. BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPOINT A PLANNING COMMISSION CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON FOR FISCAL YEAR 2023/24 The Commission waived presentation of the staff report, which is on file in the Design and Development Department. Vice Chairperson McCune asked for nominations for the position of Commission Chairperson. A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Tyerman/Guerrero to nominate Vice Chairperson McCune as Chairperson for the fiscal year 2023/24; Vice Chairperson McCune did not accept the nomination, and instead made a motion to nominate Commissioner Nieto for Chairperson for fiscal year 2023/24 which was seconded by Commissioner Hassett. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Vice Chairperson McCune/Commissioner Hassett to appoint Commissioner Nieto to serve as Commission Chairperson for fiscal year 2023/24. Motion passed: ayes — 6, noes — 0, absent — 1 (Caldwell), abstain — 0. Vice Chairperson McCune asked for nominations for the position of Commission Vice Chairperson. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Vice Chairperson McCune/Commissioner Nieto to appoint Commissioner Hassett to serve as Planning Commission Vice Chairperson for fiscal year 2023/24. Motion passed: ayes — 6, noes — 0, absent — 1 (Caldwell), abstain — 0. NEWLYAPPOINTED CHAIRPERSON NIETO ASSUMED PRESIDING OFFICER DUTIES FROM COMMISSIONER McCUNE FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING STUDY SESSION — None. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. CONSIDER ADOPTING RESOLUTIONS TO: 1) ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, AND 2) APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2023-0001 (TPM38668), MINOR USE PERMIT 2023-0001, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2023-0003, AND MINOR ADJUSTMENT 2023-0001 FOR A MIXED USE PROJECT CONSISTING OF TWO COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS AND UP TO 180 APARTMENT UNITS; PROJECT: DUNE PALMS MIXED USE PROJECT; CEQA: DESIGN AND PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 2 of 6 AUGUST 22, 2023 14 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION (EA2023-0001) CONSISTENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 AND DUNE PALMS ROAD DECLARATIONS REGARDING COMMISSION PUBLIC CONTACT — Chairperson Nieto said he met with the applicant in October of 2022 to discuss the project scope and has not had any further contact and has no conflict. Planning Manager Flores presented the staff report which is on file in the Design and Development Department. Staff answered questions regarding the request for height adjustment and Minor Use Permit; underground and landscape retention; project consistency with the Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan; future residential project site in relation to the City's Housing Element; current and future ownership of the individual parcels; timeline for development of each component; zoning and drive-through limitations and/or restrictions in the Highway 111 Corridor Area; parking space requirements; roadway connectivity, off-site improvements, and projected changes to the traffic patterns; and water availability, sustainability, and usage calculations. CHAIRPERSON NIETO DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 5:35 P.M. Commission Secretary Flores said that one written public comment was received in opposition to the project, which had been distributed to the Commission prior to the meeting and would be included in the final record of the meeting. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Applicant, Jeff Halbert, President of Blackpoint Properties, introduced himself and answered questions regarding architectural and landscape design of both commercial sites; Highway 111 Corridor Plan consistency, positioning and alignment of each building on the project site, and utilization of existing roadways; parking lot design, analysis, and calculations for Chick-fil-A site; Quick Quack Car Wash (Quick Quack) architectural design; vacuum and parking stall analysis and calculations; and storm and roadway water overflow, site drainage, and retention basins. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Project California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Consultants Kelly Clark and Dominique Camps of Terra Nova Planning and Research, Inc. answered questions regarding the noise analysis and calculations; water usage analysis and calculations (particularly for the Quick Quack usage); and noise mitigation of landscape and perimeter walls. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Jason Sims-Prewitt, Director of Operations for Quick Quack Car Wash, provided additional information regarding water use and the recycling process; difference of architecture, landscape, and equipment of the proposed site as compared to existing sites; noise reduction efforts and noise leaking in the surrounding area; and history of Quick Quack closures and company stability and viability. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 3 of 6 AUGUST 22, 2023 15 PUBLIC SPEAKER: Kelsey Wu, Senior Manager for Chick-fil-A, introduced herself and provided additional information regarding increased parking standards assessed by Chick-fil-A; increased landscaping and shading within the parking lot; inside and outside seating calculations; architecture design features; and site ownership, site management, and other local locations. CHAIRPERSON NIETO DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 6:15 P.M. The Commission expressed appreciation for the applicant's consideration to architecture and design consistency with the City's character and the Highway 111 Corridor and expressed support for the mixed-use aspect of the project; commented on future planning needs considering the Highway 111 Corridor plan, housing site at the north, and pedestrian circulation in the area, and pedestrian walkway connectivity to CV Link and Highway 111; suggested additional landscaping changes, including increasing landscape wall height and adding berming and artificial mounding along perimeter wall, widening sidewalks and adding additional trees for shading to encourage pedestrian use, additional landscaping elements at Quick Quack site exit, and reduction in parking to allow additional shading through landscape features; expressed concerns regarding lack of architectural style at the south elevation on Chick-fil-A site; landscape maintenance and upkeep for necessary shading and aesthetics through the parking lot and connecting sidewalks; and overflow from lane stacking. CHAIRPERSON NIETO DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING RE -OPENED AT 6:40 P.M. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Mr. Halbert provided additional information regarding site plans, changes made to comply with City code requirements, feasibility of moving different components of the project; proposed suggestions to change the architectural and landscape design and increase shading along connecting sidewalk based on the Commission's comments; architectural design of Chick-fil-A south elevation; and expressed willingness to work with Staff to make recommended adjustments while remaining compliant with City code. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Ms. Wu discussed parking lot and space design and Chick-fil-A parking requirements; use of additional canopy shading and increasing proposed landscape features versus a reduction in parking spaces; difficulty in making changes to south elevation design and rooflines due to fire code compliance and restrictions; and stacking projections and analysis. CHAIRPERSON NIETO DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 7:00 P.M. Commission discussion followed regarding changes connecting sidewalk and landscaping to provide additional shading for pedestrian walkability; changes to perimeter landscaping including increasing wall height and additional artificial mounding and berming to camouflage vehicle drive and stacking; additional architectural enhancements PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 4 of 6 AUGUST 22, 2023 i[ at the Chick-fil-A south elevation; and changes to parking lot plans to allow for increased shading through landscape changes and improvements. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioner Hassett/Guerrero to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-014 as recommended: A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR A MIXED USE PROJECT INCLUDING A 4, 778 SF CHICK-FIL-A, 3,596 SF QUICK QUUACK CAR WASH, AND UP TO 180 RESIDENTIAL UNITS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 AND DUNE PALMS ROAD CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2023-0001 APPLICANT: BLACKPOINT PROPERTIES Motion passed: ayes — 6, noes — 0, absent — 1 (Caldwell), abstain — 0. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Chairperson Nieto/Commissioner Guerrero to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2023-015 as amended adding Conditions of Approval to enhance architectural features of the Chick-fil-A south elevation, making changes to the perimeter landscape plans to include increased wall height and adding berming and mounding along Highway 111 frontage, adding shade trees staggered on either side of the sidewalk between the two commercial parcels, making changes to parking lot landscape design to enhance shading and reduce asphalt in the Chick-fil-A parking lot, as discussed. A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP, MINOR USE PERMIT, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, AND A MINOR ADJUSTMENT FOR A MIXED USE PROJECT INCLUDING A 4,778 SF CHICK-FIL-A, 3,596 SF QUICK QUACK CAR WASH AND UP TO 180 RESIDENTIAL UNITS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 AND DUNE PALMS ROAD CASE NUMBERS: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP 2023-0001 (TPM 38668); MINOR USE PERMIT 2023-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2023-0003; MINOR ADJUSTMENT 2023-0001 APPLICANT: BLACKPOINT PROPERTIES Motion passed: ayes — 6, noes — 0, absent — 1 (Caldwell), abstain — 0. STAFF ITEMS Planning Manager Flores provided general project updates, including information on the upcoming Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission regarding the Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan scheduled for September 26, 2023; status of previously considered or approved projects including La Quinta Village Apartments, La Villetta, Jefferson Square Apartments, and Desert Club Apartments; upcoming projects including Hampton Inn and Travertine residential development; commercial projects currently under construction including Stuft Pizza patio upgrades and Longhorn Steakhouse; and residential developments currently under construction or near completion including Point Happy, Piazza Serena, SolTerra, Palo Verde, and Stone Creek. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 5 of 6 AUGUST 22, 2023 17 COMMISSIONER ITEMS The Commission expressed appreciation for Staff and First Responders in their public outreach and communication and their continuing cleanup efforts after the recent storm and flooding caused by Hurricane Hilary; and complimented the City on flood prevention projects implemented since the last major storm and flooding in 2014. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Vice Chairperson Hassett/Chairperson Nieto to adjourn this meeting at 7:41 p.m. Motion passed: ayes — 6, noes — 0, absent — 1 (Caldwell), abstain — 0. Respectfully submitted, TANIA FLORES, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES Page 6 of 6 AUGUST 22, 2023 18 BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: October 10, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA` TITLE: APPROVE CANCELLATION OF REGULAR PLANNING COMMISSION MEETINGS OF NOVEMBER 28 AND DECEMBER 26, 2023 RECOMMENDATION Approve the cancellation of the regular Planning Commission meetings of November 28 and December 26, 2023. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Planning Commission (Commission) traditionally modifies its meeting schedule during the holidays if there are no known time -sensitive matters requiring Commission consideration. • The Design and Development Director and Planning Staff have determined that there are no items ready to be scheduled for Commission consideration for the November 28 and December 26, 2023 Planning Commission meetings. • Advance notice of cancelled meetings will allow Planning Commissioners, Staff, and the public to properly plan for deadlines, workflow, and their schedules. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Design and Development Director and Planning Staff have reviewed items requiring Commission consideration and found no matters that would require the Commission's review on November 26 and December 26, 2023. The recommended November/December meeting schedule would be as follows: • November 14, 2023 • November 28, 2023 • December 12, 2023 • December 26, 2023 • January 9, 2024 regular meeting CANCEL regular meeting CANCEL regular meeting Should a pressing situation or matter require Commission direction or action before or in between the regular meetings, a special meeting can be called. 19 ALTERNATIVES The Commission may select alternate dates for meeting cancellations or cancel no meetings. Prepared by: Tania Flores, Administrative Technician Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director 20 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 10, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE CHANGES TO THE LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PROJECT; CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PREPARED A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION CONSISTENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; LOCATION: NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 RECOMMENDATION Adopt resolutions to recommend to City Council to approve changes to the La Quinta Village Apartments project consisting of 252 units located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The project site is located on a vacant parcel on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50, the site of the previously approved La Paloma project (Attachment 1). The Applicant is requesting entitlement approval for a 252 -unit apartment project which would include 178 market -rate units and 74 moderate -income affordable units. The project would include site improvements such as landscaping, utility infrastructure, covered parking, clubhouse, pool, spa, barbeque areas, putting course, pickleball court, and dog park. • The project was heard by the Planning Commission (Commission) on March 28 and June 27, 2023. The Commission recommended adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND), and a favorable recommendation for the General Plan Amendment (GPA). March 28, 2023 Agenda Packet https://www.laquintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/48177/638152738498670000 June 27, 2023 Agenda Packet https://www.laquintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/48595/638230549123230000 The City Council heard the project on August 1, 2023 where Council members voted to continue the hearing and remand back to the Commission because changes were requested which the Commission did not review. Council requested the applicant change the architectural style of the buildings to Spanish Hacienda style, remove all three-story buildings, and remove garages on the north side. The applicant has made these changes as reflected in the attached plan set (Attachment 2). 21 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Applicant is proposing a 252 -unit, multifamily apartment project on the site, which would include 178 market -rate units and 74 moderate -income affordable units. The project is located on a 14.03 -acre vacant parcel, bordered by a residential community to the north, Washington Street to the west, vacant land to the east, and Avenue 50 to the south. The La Paloma SP is currently effective for the project site. The current General Plan designation for the site is MHDR (Medium High Density Residential); zoning for the site is RMH (Medium High Density Residential). Summary of Revisions Specific Plan Amendment The proposed SP amendment document has been revised to reflect the changes that the Council requested (Attachment 3). Changes made include reducing the maximum height from three to two stories and removing references to garages on the north side of the site as they have been removed from the site plan. The development standards are summarized below. Standard Specific Plan Medium High Density Zone Minimum Project Size for Multi -Family Projects 20,000 sf 20,000 sf Minimum Frontage for Multi -Family Projects 100 ft 100 ft Maximum Structure Height 40 ft 28 ft Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor 28 ft 22 ft Maximum Number of Stories 2 2 Minimum Front Yard Setback 20 ft 20 ft Minimum Interior/Exterior Side Yard Setback 5/10 ft 5/10 ft Minimum Rear Yard Setback 15 ft 15 ft Minimum Garage Setback 5 ft 25 ft Maximum Lot Coverage 60% 60% Minimum Common Open Area 30% 30% Minimum/Average Perimeter Landscape Setback 10/20 ft 10/20 ft Minimum Livable Area 670 sf 750 sf Site Development Permit In order to accommodate all two-story buildings and keep the proposed 252 units, the site plan layout has been reconfigured to include 12 buildings (Attachment 2). A breakdown of the 252 total units is as follows: • 74 of the units are moderate -income affordable deed restricted units • 178 are market rate • 166 units are one (1) bedroom units o 60 are 673 sf, 106 are 755 sf • 86 units are two (2) bedroom units: o All are 960 sf 22 Parking With the revision of the site plan layout, 528 parking spaces are proposed, which is a ratio of 2.09 spaces per unit. Of these, 359 are covered by carports. With the elimination of garages, there are 37 less covered spaces. The carports are at a maximum height of 11 ft and incorporate architecture to match the rest of the development. Building Design The architectural style has been revised from contemporary Mediterranean to Spanish Hacienda style. Architectural elements include trellises on second floors to reduce massing and arches, recessed niches, and crown moulding with stucco finish. The color palette consists of earth tones, and incorporates blues, grays, and purples as accents. Landscaping Landscaping is proposed throughout the project site, including along Washington Street and Avenue 50, and described within the SP. The landscaping remains substantially the same as the prior iteration except for removal of artificial turf. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on September 29, 2023, and distributed to properties within 1,000 feet of the Site. -NVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department (Department) prepared a MND consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Department determined that the project would have less than significant effects on the environment, with mitigation measures incorporated. The MND has been revised based on revisions to the project as requested in public hearings. These revisions do not constitute substantial revisions per Section 15073.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and recirculation of the MND is not required. Prepared by: Cheri Flores, Planning Manager Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Entitlement Plans 3. Draft Specific Plan 23 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL TO APPROVE CHANGES TO THE LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PROJECT, LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND AVENUE 50 XIVI kiIII ►yil114Z95 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0002 SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, AMENDMENT 2) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2022-0001 APPLICANT: IRWIN PARTNERS ARCHITECTS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on October 10, 2023, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider changes to the La Quinta Village Apartments project consisting of 252 units located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50, more particularly described as: Assessor Parcel Number: 646-070-016 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on September 29, 2023, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the site; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on August 1, 2023, previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider adoption of a Mitigated Negative Declaration and approval of a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and Site Development Permit; and WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, the City Council did continue the public hearing until a date uncertain and remanded the applications to the Planning Commission requesting that the applicant make changes to the project including reducing the number of stories of the units from three to two stories, changing the architectural style of the buildings from Contemporary Modern to Spanish Hacienda style, and removing garages on the north side of the site plan, and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on March 28, 2023, previously hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider said request and continued said Public Hearing to a date certain of June 27, 2023, to give the applicant time to address the Planning Commission's concerns regarding architectural design, density and height of buildings, parking, and traffic; and 24 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0002; SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, AMENDMENT 2); SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 PROJECT: LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ADOPTED: PAGE 2OF2 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on June 27, 2023, hold a continued Public Hearing considering changes to the project as requested and did recommend adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration; and did not provide a recommendation for approval of the General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and Site Development Permit due to less than majority vote approval; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the Planning Commission in this case. SECTION 2. That Environmental Assessment 2022-0001 does not introduce any new significant impacts and therefore does not need to be recirculated for public review per CEQA Guidelines Section 15073.5. SECTION 3. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend to the Council approval of the changes made to the project as outlined in the staff report for the project, incorporated by reference herein. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission, held on October 10, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DOUG HASSETT, Vice Chairperson City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: DANNY CASTRO, Design and Development Director City of La Quinta, California 25 �l r I I JFRW e 41p MOM b 17 pir lk t i- 44 figGO PIT 0-' W7. 4041. PkL 0 FID. I � F -.t- La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. ATTACHMENT 2 PROJECT DATA SHEET INDEX PROJECT ADDRESS T1 Title NE CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET & AVENUE 50 CIVIL ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER 646-070-016 Cl CIVIL SITE PLAN C2 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN LEGAL DESCRIPTION ALC3 ilk PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 13.84 ACRES M/L IN POR LOT 1 MB 023/099 DESERT CLUB MANOR TR 2 Lot 1 Subdivision Name DESERT CLUB MANOR TR 2 Acres 013.84 M/L LotType Lot Rec Map Type Map Book Map Plat B 023 Map Plat P 099 Portion Lot Portion ARCHITECTURAL SCOPE OF WORK A01 Site Plan PROPOSED TWO-STORY APARTMENT BUILDINGS WITH CLUBHOUSE, GARAGES, f A02 First Floor Plan CARPORTS, POOL, AND COMMUNITY SPACES AND NECESSARY HARDSCAPE AND �r LANDSCAPE. A03 Second Floor Plan A04 Roof Plan PROPOSED LAND USE - RENTAL APARTMENTS i A05 Unit Plans A06 Clubhouse SITE DATA EXISTING ZONING RMH - MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL A07 Bldg. 1 -Elevations (8-12 UNITS PER ACRE) A08 Bldg. 2 - Elevations INCLUDES AFFORDABLE DENITY BONUS OVERLAY s� ,�'� `=" A09 Bldg. 3 - Elevations PROPOSED ZONING RMH - MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ' � •� A10 Bldg. 4 -Elevations (8-12 UNITS PER ACRE)- WITH DENSITY BONUS - SEE PROJECT INFO BELOW • A11 Bldg. 4 - Elevations SITE AREA 611,146.8 SF / 14.03 ACRES �(�.� =, w� = \__ Al2 Bldg. 5 - Elevations BUILDING FOOTPRINT 107,498 SF A13 Bldg. 6 -Elevations MAX. LOT COVERAGE 60% OF NET LOT AREA = 366,688.08 SF _` +� •• a i �'' A14 Bldgs. 7 & 12 -Elevations g LOT COVERAGE PROPOSED 35% = 213,901 SF • _, TOTAL BUILDING AREA 258,199 SF ' ^+ ;,� �., _ / _ A15 Bldg.8 -Elevations TOTAL PROPSED DWELLING UNITS 252 UNITS / 214,996 SF ' _; , \. .,-. ;' A16 Bldg. 9 - Elevations \ Bldg. 10 Elevations `�-� mawA17 .� • n $ �' • A18 Bldg. 11 - Elevations MIN. COMMON OPEN AREA REQUIRED: 30% OF NET PROJECT AREA= 183,344.04 SF • � � -i %� � � � �+ � y\ � �:'�•, ��, c.,,, COMMON OPEN AREA PROVIDED: 34.6% = 211,482 SF " • M s 1: A19 Exterior Elevations ' ` ` .` r• v' • 7 7 A20 3D Views ACTIVE RECREATION AREA REQUIRED: 30% OF COMMON OPEN AREA REQUIRED = 55,003 SF ACTIVE RECREATION AREA PROVIDED: 31.1%=57,110 SF�- ►:_! ey' IF #IL ,� , �� :- 7 A21 3D Views & Materials Board A22 Line Sight Diagrams �` • of MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK: 20'-0"..'° �� t, I � MINIMUM INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK: 5'-0" ,1 MINIMUM EXTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK: 10'-0" • . -- � % MINIMUM REAR YARD SETBACK: 15'-0" • ► . � :., , ..,; < - , • F • , . LANDSCAPE MIN. PERIMETER LANDSCAPE SETBACK: 10'-0" -,-`„• LP -1 C nce tual La dsca e Plan Conceptual AVG. PERIMETER LANDSCAPE SETBACK: 20'-0" � N LP -2 Typical Building Planting Exhibit MAX. NO. OF STORIES ALLOWED PER RMH ZONING: 2 ' ,`., ___ LP -3 Slope Planting Exhibit LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN, EXHIBIT 3.6: _ .. �.,� l - Pool LP Entry PRIMARY IMAGE CORRIDOR: WASHINGTON STREET \\ �� \` -5 SECONDARY IMAGE CORRIDOR: AVENUE 50 IMAGE CORRIDOR SETBACK: 150'-0" X�NX �� i��\ `�, - _- '� -_;` _ _-_ _ ~ _ LP -6 Conceptual Wall & Fence Plan ALLOWABLE BLDG HEIGHT AT IMAGE CORRIDOR: 22'-0" (WASHINGTON STREET & AVENUE 50) ***SEE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR ADD. INFO*** _. -- -- _ _ - - - _ \�_ - _ _`-�--'--,- -- - - - - -- �` - - - _ - -- - _ - - --- BUILDING CONSTRUCTION _ OCCUPANCY TYPES: R-2, A-2, A-3, AND B CONSTRUCTION TYPE: TYPE V-A SPRINKLERS. YES, FULLY SPRINKLERED (NFPA 13) ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT PER RMH ZONING: 28'-0" PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT AT CLUBHOUSE: 19'-0" PROPOSED BUILDING HEIGHT AT 2 -STORY BLDGS: 27'-6" PLANS SHALL BE PREPARED TO THE APPLICABLE CODE AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL FOR BUILDING PERMIT. AS OF JANUARY 1, 2020, ALL WORK SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH 2019 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODES PROJECT INFORMATION PARKING CALCULATIONS VICINITY MAP PROJECT TEAM UNIT MIX Parking Calcs - �t a Unit Type Unit Name Qt Area SF Total SF Yp Y ( ) ( ) Qty PARKING RATIOS � OWNER 1 -Bed Apartment 1A -ADA 34 673 22,882 C 8 PARKING LEGEND AND REQUIRED SIZES: 4 PER LQMC 9.60.260 (K) BY -RIGHT PARKING INCENTIVE, THE , � � ' �.��. x. '" 4 ' _ _ . t . , Troutdale Village, LLC g 1 -Bed Apartment 1A -STD 30 673 20,190 CP 300 C = COMPACT PARKING SPACE (8.5' X 16') FOLLOWING PARKING RATIOS SHALL APPLY TO THE ENTIRE �+ - �.:.. � •.. � �' 1800 Blankenship Rd., Suite 325 West Linn, Oregon 97068 1 -Bed Apartment 1 B -ADA 34 755 25,670 CP = COVERED STANDARD PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') DEVELOPMENT (INCLUDING MARKET -RATE UNITS) I�_ (503) 807-8852 1 -Bed Apartment 1 B -STD 34 755 25,670 FEV 50T: FEV = FUTURE EV PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') 1 -BR UNITS: 1 SPACE PER UNIT REQUIRED -+' Jeff Parker 2 -Bed Apartment 2A -ADA 68 960 65,280 FEV HC 1 FEV HC =FUTURE EV ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE 9' X 19' +5' AISLE 2 -BR UNITS: 1.5 SPACES PER UNIT REQUIRED ( ) Q :^ - 2 -Bed Apartment 2A -STD 52 960 49,920 FEV VAN 1 FEV VAN = FUTURE EV VAN PARKING SPACE (9' X 19') +8' AISLE } •`' *. � k ARCHITECT Irwin Partners Architects 252 209,612 sq ft HC 8 HC = ACCESSIBLE STANDARD PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') +5' AISLE PARKING FACILITY BREAKDOWN = 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B2 HC Van 2 HC VAN = ACCESSIBLE VAN PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') +8' AISLE UNCOVERED STANDARD PARKING SPACES: 145 (Includes 0 FEV space) .' Costa Mesa, CA 92626 DENSITY CALCULATIONS Mail 1 a _ UNCOVERED COMPACT PARKING SPACES: 8 (Includes 0 FEV space) MAIL DESIGNATED MAIL VAN PARKING SPACE 9' X 19' ( ) .• p- T: 714-557-2448 W: www.Ipaoc.com UNCOVERED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES: 7 (Includes 2 FEV spaces) BASE DENSITY: 14.03 ACRES x 12 UNITS/ACRE = 168 BASE UNITS P 151 P = STANDARD PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') (9'X 17) CARPORT STANDARD PARKING SPACES: 350 (Includes 50 FEV spaces) f" i ¢ - Sherry Braun TOTAL UNITS PROPOSED: 252 UNITS - 522 CARPORT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES: 5 (Includes 0 FEV spaces) CIVIL 50% DENSITY BONUS IS BEING PROPOSED TOTAL SPACES 522 (Includes 52 FEV spaces) Egan Civil, Inc. 14.03 ACRES x 18 UNITS/ACRE = 252 PROPOSED UNITS - - 42945 Madio Street, Suite A FOR 50% DENSITY BONUS, 44% OF BASE UNITS NEED TO BE MODERATE INCOME UNITS p� Indio, CA 92201 BASED ON LQMC 9.60.260 DENSITY BONUS PERCENTAGES. ,*., " '' ' T: (760) 404-7663 x; ° W: egancivil.com 44% x 168 = 74 MODERATE INCOME UNITS PARKING REQUIRED (INCLUDES COVERED PARKING) PER LQMC 9.60.260 (K) BY -RIGHT PARKING INCENTIVE ; �' Steven Egan, Project Designer MARKET -RATE UNITS 178 UNIT MIX AS PERCENTAGES: MODERATE INCOME UNITS 74 132 1 -BED UNITS (52.38% of 252 UNITS) 120 2 -BED UNITS (47.61 % of 252 UNITS) NOTE: LQMC 9.60.260 (K) BY -RIGHT PARKING INCENTIVE AND PARKING RATIOS APPLY TO THE ENTIRE DEVELOPMENT NOT RESTRICTED TO ONLY AFFORDABLE UNITS PARKING RATIOS PER LQMC 9.60.260 ARE LISTED ABOVE. "' r-"}+ j , � "- f :" LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Hermann Design Group, Inc. TOTAL UNITS 252 UNITS: 132 1 -BR UNITS 1 SPACE/UNIT REQUIRED = 132 '•:; t''� „*�„ .t _ ,` 252 TOTAL UNITS x ° 77899 Wolf Road, Suite 102 120 2 -BR UNITS x 1.5 SPACES/UNIT REQUIRED = 180 QPalm i, PROJECT SITE, - Desert, CA 92211 MARKET -RATE UNITS PROVIDED: MODERATE INCOME UNITS PROVIDED: COMMUNITY CENTER: 1 SPACE PER 300 SF OF GROSS FLOOR AREA�;. .. - .. T: 760-777-9131 93 1 -BED UNITS 39 1 -BED UNITS (52.7% of 74 UNITS) 2000 SF / 300 SF = 7 ; " "t W: hdg-inc.com 85 2 -BED UNITS 35 2 -BED UNITS (47.29% of 74 UNITS) TOTAL SPACES REQUIRED: 319 - Jose Estrada, VP, Project Manager 178 TOTAL MARKET RATE UNITS PROV'D 74 TOTAL MODERATE INCOME UNITS PROV'D TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 528 ELECTRICAL Gross Building Area Common Area Calculations RTM Engineering Consultants Area (SF) Area (SF) 39249 Leopard Street, Suite A-101 1, First Floor COVERED PARKING NOT REQUIRED PER LQMC 9.60.260 (K) BY -RIGHT PARKING INCENTIVE Palm Desert, CA 92211 Bldg 01 18,734 9,367 SF PER FLOOR CLUBHOUSE RESIDENT ACTIVITY 978 UNITS: PROVIDED: 359 COVERED 156 UNCOVERED T: (760) 983-2007 Bldg 02 15,534 7,767 SF PER FLOOR Fire Riser MECHANICAL 12 COMMUNITY CENTER: PROVIDED: 0 COVERED 7 UNCOVERED " F - W: www.wtmec.com Victor Leon, PE, Principal Bldg 03 22,895 11,447.5 SF PER FLOOR GYM RESIDENT ACTIVITY 725. TOTAL SPACES PROVIDED: 359 COVERED + 163 UNCOVERED = 522 TOTAL ! - 1 Bldg 04 26,536 13,268 SF PER FLOOR HALL CIRCULATION 186 l - Bldg 05 29,612 14,806 SF PER FLOOR HK SERVICE 36 NOTE: ADA AND FEV PARKING IS INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL PARKING COUNT Bldg 06 24,393 12,196.5 SF PER FLOOR Office ADMINISTRATION 290 • Bldg 07 & 12 50,438 12,609.5 SF PER FLOOR RR RESTROOMS 124 ACCESSIBLE PARKING CALCULATIONS FUTURE EV PARKING REQUIRED PER CALGREEN BICYCLE PARKING REQUIRED PER CALGREEN CH 5 TOTAL PARKING SPACES 528 TOTAL PARKING SPACES 528 SHORT-TERM 0.35 Bldg 08 22,894 11,447 SF PER FLOOR Shower RESTROOMS 68 10% OF TOTAL PARKING SPACES 52.8 (5°r° OF VISITOR VEHICLE PARKING) Bldg 09 27,131 13,565.5 SF PER FLOOR Stor SERVICE 111 2% OF 515 ASSIGNED PARKING SPACES 10.56 LONG-TERM 0 - N/A I . . ! ':;;,,yl;�vrr ■ TOTAL HC SPACES REQ'D 11 FUTURE EV SPACES REQ'D 53 NOT REQ'D, NO 10 OR MORE TENANT -OCCUPANTS 7'IF Bldg 10 19,467 9,733.5 SF PER FLOOR Wet Bar CIRCULATION 36 FUTURE EV SPACES PROVIDED 53' WH Bldg 11 17,849 8,924.5 SF PER FLOOR MECHANICAL 12 o MIN. BICYCLE PARKING REQ'D 2 5 /o OF 7 UNASSIGNED PARKING SPACES 0.35 Q TOTAL HC SPACES REQ'D 1 TOTAL BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED 4 ..k � - Clubhouse 3,019 2,578 S ft q 1 -STORY ( ) ADA CAR SPACES REQ'D PER CALGREEN 4.106.4.2: ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING 10 278,502 sq ft ADA VAN SPACES REQ'D 1 SPACES (EV SPACES) CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING FUTURE _ NOTE: GROSS BUILDING AREA INCLUDES AREA EACH DWELLING UNIT HAS 60 SF MINIMUM PRIVATE PATIO OR BALCONY TOTAL ADA SPACES PROVIDED ELECTRICAL VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT (EVSE). 12 INTENDED TO DEMONSTRATE PROJECT'S CAPABILITY & WITHIN SURROUNDING EXTERIOR WALLS AND EACH BUILDING HAS ONE FIRE RISER - SEE CIVIL FOR LOCATIONS CAPACITY FOR FACILITATING FUTURE EV CHARGING. IN AREAS OF BUILDING NOT PROVIDED WITH NO REQUIREMENT FOR EV SPACES TO BE CONSTRUCTED OR SURROUNDING WALLS IF WITHIN HORIZONTAL AVAILABLE UNTIL EV CHARGERS ARE INSTALLED FOR USE. PROJECTION OF ROOF OR FLOOR ABOVE (EXCLUSIVE OF VENT SHAFTS AND COURTS). mot! � IPAIRWIN PARTNERS 0� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 Title T1 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 27 4 - p(m 1 I'�� r;�� - _ J�i�sic�i.i��— � .ri■�i■�l�i �- � I\ _ [!II ■: fi' ••1 �•_ ! ` —i:� �� ■ �L � � t� �'- , i� -i.�r''� r' I FosI► '� '�� I I , I �� I I��I I -s;�y�Fpffiffi_4f_A'pAvw0y,��.�� a D��. �d�� ., D �� D� ,�� .�D� y ` �yy- yy yyy� ��D��y'�yy �!,ri �_�_s��"��.%��d��i�.i�'��C�'i��2'J.��/��.�i.. � �_�G�o�.�►.i►I1�.�_,.�.��►.��'�'/��►:i1i...r�./_��i,�� '��i_ // �..fi��., _ /1L�� .�i..v.��r�i��I�� /. /� i��.. i�''�i��i.�.� �� • �_i,,�� .mayp .,-...I�,,�,,y ��_ ,� y �� , y �,a► ,.� , .,..,� y ' I��1 I ' �' ,'�' % ► I I,. .�I r I � ' I �/ 'r� � �� ,I .�►v �I� � �P � � I i I . � � , y - I � � �► � II it � I.�� ' �� • I I � it � �//'. �� i � i • '�/.�I '�� I � . �� • II � --. �� I 01 �� II PA �E 1 �.------------�------------- ---- �� -- - --- ��--------------------------- :. ,G�, SII %y'. y l ✓ ,� 11 ,. , -- OpFff21 4 4_ .O :. �� . - : '� • .. 1 1 Ifo:" �� .I .. • � � �, / .� -1 �� 1i//,IY / I>• I - - �� p �, '�jp� > ---- -- �� ISI-- .� �.��,.., rr/ti , iI - • ,I .- .- ��;j,jj �(r �,•�,• �� _��id 1 - 1 11 111/�/ � ��I � . �� _� �. ' �.� � � I • �� ' �i � ♦ ��,► *14 FAR.�, '► �.. , _ ,, Jj► ��. _. � oil ►��:�,�/ � �� . � ,� � y �� I�� , . � - ,, d �O spy Ilk I- 4 Ilk `IIS ' / lII� y • I�/ii.0,14 ff7Arj tArA �I,'y� �� 7 , . �,/1 �j� L. r�%�7 , • �� % FOS I i � � /�I iu� I�/ '' .��il►.�//.�i�LI,� �� ,j� �/ � �♦Ii ice,, � . / ■�II1�� ,� L'//. �i/��/'//%' .ia�' • ' �W.•I�li�i�fl, � � . - I,--�—� -,� I 'moi/i i �!I�� /�,�/ '�O I,��I r�;.�p►/ �/ s� .. --,�� ' a /I a �� _ �'i ,- � � � � • RAI � �� i,i_ . � e• a �� %/1!/ I �� • - � � ��l1��r.� � p ---------- -----.------ . -- : ----- - --�==----------- • � �' I � r ! Ir i/ II I p II ►I�r r OVA .I l� 1• . . • VjL�'I! e /��,% I I . 1 •• �� "!� 1 r I�/ I I i r �� i I 1► �� 1 �I!�. / I 1� I I .� V/�. .I/l, c.u�► • - /� jf / // • /� /%�/1//i/� �/1 �, .. �, _ � I �/.r �� .%/'" I� , y ,..�:!.Q',� :•-.. �y pal �I�I � ��y ,��,�i,' �� o��l/d�y!�'� ,��/.�dr�ryll.� �� ' � �� .d�� y ��D.�,� r � � •,,y/: ��pi 70, � I , ,�j, pp , Mgt ��I�,� .�!��,..Ia��L�i, �� .1111I V/012/21 V420i,- -------------- _ - — , A y 0 III :. / . , _ �� , �� •,vjl � . , �� 1 , �C • 1 1 2 -STORY x 2 -STORY / 16 UNITS I�1 •• •- 001FOOTPRINT - 7,500± SF IIS JJ �.. r� ► �� .�� --- _- _ �;,_-.---y- _ _ _ - ., co, 1H ELIO, R x 35.1 i �H 100.00— -------- ---- _ _ ---- — — -- — -- — --- -_ ----- -- --- o D N84° 16'2 "— — — Ex. RI — — — —�— _ _ Ln DRAINAGE EASEMENT ----_--_ _--- --- N44°21'06"W ° -- --- I__ ----� ----- — — 73R— _---�--> ,—�— oma— 32.52' �� LC) o — — — — — — — — — ----- _ — __ ---- ° - - \\ H (0 IG -OF-WAY) H o 00 A sph. 010 44. ------ TRAF C LANE TRAFF --------LAW-_ onc. ----------------- -------------------------- - --�- FFIC L /----------- - - _ MH ------------------------------------ CART BIKE LANE LOW WATER CROSSING — � x o --- ------ --- ------------------------ fO 40 0 40 80 120 ABBREVIA TIONS.' C/L CENTERLINE TP TOP OF PAVEMENT SCALE: 1 "=40' EG EXISTING GROUND TC TOP OF CURB FL FLOW LINE TF TOP OF FOOTING FS FINISH SURFACE TW TOP OF WALL GB GRADE BREAK (XX.XX) EXISTING ELEVATION SWALE PRINTED ON: 08/15/2023 �H� O BENCHMARK: ENGINEER COUNTY EGAN CINC.rolBENCHMARK: TOP OF CURB #2006 /ELEVATION: 252.27 TC /DATUM: NGVD29 FT MARK BY DATE REVISIONS APPR. DATE QFESS/0N APPROVED BY: PLAN CHECKED BY: IN THE CITY OF LA GUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIAD DESCRIPTION: TOP OF CURB AT THE BCR AS SHOWN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE c0 �N DAN/cq! SHEET STREET PLANS FOR THE KESSLER OFFICE BUILDING, SHEET 9 OF 9 ON FILE IN THE �� ,P �. �y Wal LA OUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS CALL OFFICE OF CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE AS PLAN NUMBER E0600371. y �a y PO BOX 5282, LA GUINTA, CA 92248-5282 CIVIL OF DIAL m Z m (7GO) 404-7GG3 M.EGANCIVIL.COM DATE CIVIL SITE PLAN 3 eAsls of BEARINGS: SHEETS BEFORE DIG 811 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA NO. 73070 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: �10 COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE VI, (2017.50 EPOCH) AS PER GRID INVERSE * TRAFFIC CITY FILE NUMBER TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 CALCULATIONS BETWEEN CONTINUOSLY OPERATING REFERENCE (C.O.R.S.) STATIONS CIV IQ 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG P491 AND PIN1 PER PUBLISHED VALUES PROVIDED BY THE SCRIPPS ORBIT AND qlF OF CA`�Fp� DATE: 06/06/2023 A PUBLIC SERVICE BY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT PERMANENT ARRAY CENTER (S.O.P.A.C.), BEING: NORTH 78 59 35.49 WEST. WASHINGTON ST &AVENUE 50, LA GUINTA, CA 92253 BENJAMIN DANIEL ELAN, R.C.E. 73070 REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY: DATE LANDSCAPE APN 646-070-016 28 3 IRR w w U) x 48'61 v x 48. �I I I \ I I 49.2 / I // // / / // / / // // / / i I I o L -1 � / I / // / // / // // // // // // U I I - nn �'/'/ 0. — --- - - — PROP TY L`1NE o ' N89 59 5 1215.32 ° — — — — — — — — — — ==F1 FFTTi7TTN U NZTF9FR, 0 x SETBACK �xf4f �_fl LLLLL��J'±5 T ftts :f5' -4U OAF i I W4 wi E —�—' ii lik — 1 i WE 10 1 -r ri rid14-01111ill�1=11- 1-k '01r w I T I ri i�sh. WE I ON I�il I 1 � i 1 I -r i I /MM WAWAWAWM 1161, RAN PON ,► � I - Via►, ,�� :' ,. ------ --------------- — ------ jI win I I' II '�- I " � 1 '' :�. - '► �= : 11001 - _ _ • o ,�I� i , � �— __fir = � – � � �1 �,'►:�w� ILI 1 I ___-_ ---- _ / 1 '1MONO Cb � o c C L CENTERLINE RAW CUT: 5,500 YARDS EG EXISTING GROUND TC TOP OF CURB RAW FILL: 47,400 YARDS FL FLOW LINE TF TOP OF FOOTING IMPORT: 41,900 YARDS FS FINISH SURFACE jW TOP OF WALL THE ABOVE QUANTITIES ARE AN ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ONLY AND GB GRADE BREAK �XX.XX) EXISTING ELEVATION ARE PROVIDED FOR GRADING PERMIT PURPOSES. CONTRACTOR CP 3: COVERED PARKING SWALE SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES FOR THIS BID PURPOSES. PRINTED ON: 08/16/2023 �H� BENCHMARK: ENGINEER COUNTY BENCHMARK: TOP OF CURB #2006 /ELEVATION: 252.27 TC /DATUM: NGVD29 FT MARK BY DATE REVISIONS APPR. DATE Q�oFEss/pN EGAN CINC. �. APPROVED BY: PLAN CHECKED BY: IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA D DESCRIPTION: TOP OF CURB AT THE BCR AS SHOWN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE 0 N DAN/c� q! ! 4, SHEET STREET PLANS FOR THE KESSLER OFFICE BUILDING, SHEET 9 OF 9 ON FILE IN THE �� ,P �. �y ` LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS CALL OFFICE OF CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE AS PLAN NUMBER E0600371. y ki y PO BOX 5282, LA QUINTA, CA 92248-5282 CIVIL OF DIAL G m Z m (7150) 404-715153 M.EGANCIVIL.COM DATE CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 3 BASIS OF BEARINGS: SHEETS BEFORE DIG 811 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA � NO. 73070 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: x,10 COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE VI, (2017.50 EPOCH) AS PER GRID INVERSE * 7fr TRAFFIC CITY FILE NUMBER TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 CALCULATIONS BETWEEN CONTINUOSLY OPERATING REFERENCE (C.O.R.S.) STATIONS �Ivi Q 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG P491 AND PIN1 PER PUBLISHED VALUES PROVIDED BY THE SCRIPPS ORBIT AND qlF OF CA BENJAMIN DATE: 06/06/2023 A PUBLIC SERVICE BY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT PERMANENT ARRAY CENTER (S.O.P.A.C.), BEING: NORTH 78 59 35.49 WEST. WASHINGTON ST &AVENUE 50, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 BENJAMIN DANIEL ELAN, R.C.E. 73070 REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY: DATE LANDSCAPE APN 646-070-016 29 i ' 0 L_ I J a r-�ROPERTY LINEI x SETBACK �xf4f �_fl LLLLL��J'±5 T ftts :f5' -4U OAF i I W4 wi E —�—' ii lik — 1 i WE 10 1 -r ri rid14-01111ill�1=11- 1-k '01r w I T I ri i�sh. WE I ON I�il I 1 � i 1 I -r i I /MM WAWAWAWM 1161, RAN PON ,► � I - Via►, ,�� :' ,. ------ --------------- — ------ jI win I I' II '�- I " � 1 '' :�. - '► �= : 11001 - _ _ • o ,�I� i , � �— __fir = � – � � �1 �,'►:�w� ILI 1 I ___-_ ---- _ / 1 '1MONO Cb � o c C L CENTERLINE RAW CUT: 5,500 YARDS EG EXISTING GROUND TC TOP OF CURB RAW FILL: 47,400 YARDS FL FLOW LINE TF TOP OF FOOTING IMPORT: 41,900 YARDS FS FINISH SURFACE jW TOP OF WALL THE ABOVE QUANTITIES ARE AN ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ONLY AND GB GRADE BREAK �XX.XX) EXISTING ELEVATION ARE PROVIDED FOR GRADING PERMIT PURPOSES. CONTRACTOR CP 3: COVERED PARKING SWALE SHALL VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES FOR THIS BID PURPOSES. PRINTED ON: 08/16/2023 �H� BENCHMARK: ENGINEER COUNTY BENCHMARK: TOP OF CURB #2006 /ELEVATION: 252.27 TC /DATUM: NGVD29 FT MARK BY DATE REVISIONS APPR. DATE Q�oFEss/pN EGAN CINC. �. APPROVED BY: PLAN CHECKED BY: IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA D DESCRIPTION: TOP OF CURB AT THE BCR AS SHOWN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE 0 N DAN/c� q! ! 4, SHEET STREET PLANS FOR THE KESSLER OFFICE BUILDING, SHEET 9 OF 9 ON FILE IN THE �� ,P �. �y ` LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS CALL OFFICE OF CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE AS PLAN NUMBER E0600371. y ki y PO BOX 5282, LA QUINTA, CA 92248-5282 CIVIL OF DIAL G m Z m (7150) 404-715153 M.EGANCIVIL.COM DATE CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 3 BASIS OF BEARINGS: SHEETS BEFORE DIG 811 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA � NO. 73070 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: x,10 COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE VI, (2017.50 EPOCH) AS PER GRID INVERSE * 7fr TRAFFIC CITY FILE NUMBER TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 CALCULATIONS BETWEEN CONTINUOSLY OPERATING REFERENCE (C.O.R.S.) STATIONS �Ivi Q 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG P491 AND PIN1 PER PUBLISHED VALUES PROVIDED BY THE SCRIPPS ORBIT AND qlF OF CA BENJAMIN DATE: 06/06/2023 A PUBLIC SERVICE BY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT PERMANENT ARRAY CENTER (S.O.P.A.C.), BEING: NORTH 78 59 35.49 WEST. WASHINGTON ST &AVENUE 50, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 BENJAMIN DANIEL ELAN, R.C.E. 73070 REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY: DATE LANDSCAPE APN 646-070-016 29 3 IRR w w W �/ x 48'6 v x 48. / �///� 4.6 III �� I /// // // / / /i/ / / // / Al �///�; /;o // /o 0 . I I - - - I PR TY L � -; OBS. o ILI PROPERTY LINE III,\ , — 1215.32 � x51.4 42.31 BLDG. 1 i -STORY/ 16 U NITS i 16 UNITS i V I �u� •. F4 �L LPR. MAIN 1. 111 I I�I I I I �l I �� I � ' ` � �� II �� I��1�. ,�I��ihlr� �� . � i RXI 2 NMI 'LEANQUT I s,L BLDG. 3 ,"AIN'- _ _ _ i •� ��/� i � � � ,•off � �+- ,� _ ,♦► �� -1• � ; lid �� ` � � I ■ n � - � ► �2. WN IMP ON 16 UNITS ��i------- I ,,---------- - - - - --------------- SII � 1� � � i I I I' II � I '�� •1 I I I 1124 LF � , 8" SEWE MAIN 245 LF Cb � o c x 35.1 JIFA - `•MWA Mr— FOOTPRINTY/16UNITS Dog Park �=� - 11 •.•• I • ��,,_ T G • • • • �� a �� =rte _ � -'e -�- �_ 1 G � 1 • \ -u �� •' .�'i1i►�l.� -�i �+ • • i • _111 �� . 11 _ .• � MEN WANI NI 1fi .� OW , Q� __ ---_ • �� - m_� 1 PA- - t• J . 11 /„// __ ______/.. ____ _ ______ •� �-.iiiiiiii /iiiiiiiiiii/.. - - --- - /i.,,-- //%/.. , _ /////%/moi (• - -- . ,ii��%ii�ii „� .,, ///iii. _ ////!/��iii. �� 111111111111 11♦ 1 I • 40 PRINTED ON: 08/16/2023 �� BENCHMARK: ENGINEER COUNTY BENCHMARK: TOP OF CURB #2006 /ELEVATION: 252.27 TC /DATUM: NGVD29 FT MARK BY DATE REVISIONS APPR. DATE QROFESS/pN EGAN CINC. �. APPROVED BY: PLAN CHECKED BY: IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DH DESCRIPTION: TOP OF CURB AT THE BCR AS SHOWN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE c0 �N DAN/cq!! SHEET 3 STREET PLANS FOR THE KESSLER OFFICE BUILDING, SHEET 9 OF 9 ON FILE IN THE ` LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS CALL OFFICE OF CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE AS PLAN NUMBER E0600371. y �a y PO BOX 5282, LA QUINTA, CA 92248-5282 CIVIL OF DIAL �, °p Z m (7fiO) 4O4-7fifi3 WWW.EGANCIVIL.COM DATE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 3 eAsls of BEARINGS: SHEETS BEFORE DIG 81 1 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA � NO. 73070 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: �10 COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE VI, (2017.50 EPOCH) AS PER GRID INVERSE * 7fr TRAFFIC CITY FILE NUMBER TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 CALCULATIONS BETWEEN CONTINUOSLY OPERATING REFERENCE (C.O.R.S.) STATIONS �Iviv �N_ 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG P491 AND PIN1 PER PUBLISHED VALUES PROVIDED BY THE SCRIPPS ORBIT AND 9�F OF CA��DATE: 06/06/2023 A PUBLIC SERVICE BY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT PERMANENT ARRAY CENTER (S.O.P.A.C.), BEING: NORTH 78 59 35.49 WEST. WASHINGTON ST &AVENUE 50, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 BENJAMIN DANIEL ELAN, R.C.E. 73070 REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY: DATE LANDSCAPE APN 646-070-016 30 WWI No ON 1!0f�l "M'1" Im it 4 hI -40 42.31 BLDG. 1 i -STORY/ 16 U NITS i 16 UNITS i V I �u� •. F4 �L LPR. MAIN 1. 111 I I�I I I I �l I �� I � ' ` � �� II �� I��1�. ,�I��ihlr� �� . � i RXI 2 NMI 'LEANQUT I s,L BLDG. 3 ,"AIN'- _ _ _ i •� ��/� i � � � ,•off � �+- ,� _ ,♦► �� -1• � ; lid �� ` � � I ■ n � - � ► �2. WN IMP ON 16 UNITS ��i------- I ,,---------- - - - - --------------- SII � 1� � � i I I I' II � I '�� •1 I I I 1124 LF � , 8" SEWE MAIN 245 LF Cb � o c x 35.1 JIFA - `•MWA Mr— FOOTPRINTY/16UNITS Dog Park �=� - 11 •.•• I • ��,,_ T G • • • • �� a �� =rte _ � -'e -�- �_ 1 G � 1 • \ -u �� •' .�'i1i►�l.� -�i �+ • • i • _111 �� . 11 _ .• � MEN WANI NI 1fi .� OW , Q� __ ---_ • �� - m_� 1 PA- - t• J . 11 /„// __ ______/.. ____ _ ______ •� �-.iiiiiiii /iiiiiiiiiii/.. - - --- - /i.,,-- //%/.. , _ /////%/moi (• - -- . ,ii��%ii�ii „� .,, ///iii. _ ////!/��iii. �� 111111111111 11♦ 1 I • 40 PRINTED ON: 08/16/2023 �� BENCHMARK: ENGINEER COUNTY BENCHMARK: TOP OF CURB #2006 /ELEVATION: 252.27 TC /DATUM: NGVD29 FT MARK BY DATE REVISIONS APPR. DATE QROFESS/pN EGAN CINC. �. APPROVED BY: PLAN CHECKED BY: IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA DH DESCRIPTION: TOP OF CURB AT THE BCR AS SHOWN ON THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE c0 �N DAN/cq!! SHEET 3 STREET PLANS FOR THE KESSLER OFFICE BUILDING, SHEET 9 OF 9 ON FILE IN THE ` LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS CALL OFFICE OF CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE AS PLAN NUMBER E0600371. y �a y PO BOX 5282, LA QUINTA, CA 92248-5282 CIVIL OF DIAL �, °p Z m (7fiO) 4O4-7fifi3 WWW.EGANCIVIL.COM DATE PRELIMINARY UTILITY PLAN 3 eAsls of BEARINGS: SHEETS BEFORE DIG 81 1 THE BASIS OF BEARINGS FOR THIS SURVEY ARE BASED ON THE CALIFORNIA � NO. 73070 PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: �10 COORDINATE SYSTEM (CCS83), ZONE VI, (2017.50 EPOCH) AS PER GRID INVERSE * 7fr TRAFFIC CITY FILE NUMBER TOLL FREE 1-800-422-4133 CALCULATIONS BETWEEN CONTINUOSLY OPERATING REFERENCE (C.O.R.S.) STATIONS �Iviv �N_ 252 UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX AT LEAST TWO DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG P491 AND PIN1 PER PUBLISHED VALUES PROVIDED BY THE SCRIPPS ORBIT AND 9�F OF CA��DATE: 06/06/2023 A PUBLIC SERVICE BY UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT PERMANENT ARRAY CENTER (S.O.P.A.C.), BEING: NORTH 78 59 35.49 WEST. WASHINGTON ST &AVENUE 50, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 BENJAMIN DANIEL ELAN, R.C.E. 73070 REVIEWED AND RECOMMENDED BY: DATE LANDSCAPE APN 646-070-016 30 PROPERTY LINE INTERIOR SIDEYARD SETBACK LI�yi iiZ iii y��iii ��'�iiii�i�yii ii�i�i�ii�i�~ i�ii�iUii ii�ii ii/i�iyii iliiSIDEYARD SETBACK: MINIMUM 5'-0" SETBACK PLUS 1'-0" FOR (E) (E) PO P (N) CMU BLOCK WALL AT LO �� N 327.53' (E) Pow0 :t / 40.00' -F09-T C)VER 17'-0" IN -BUILDING H GHT, MAXIMk4M-&ETBACK-OF40'-� — �E REMAIN-TYP. W/ NO EXISTING BLOCK -WALL— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —BF REMAIR, TYe�- - - - — - - -- ----- -- - _- -- -- - --- - - - -- — - _ _ - - �6 FT HIGH `� 2.60' l o - •---- - ----_----- -- -- - -- -- --- o (2.57') - � 9' N89°59'50"W 1215.32' - - - - - - / / 72 zR1, R2 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �- - - (72.� 6BLOCK WALL LINE O=tG C R ID r` ;� DESERTSCAPEAREA LAWN HEIGH RT IC IO P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P P ;7p P P C C �/ N. CP 1 zo> �O> SETBACK PERT BUILDING I I CP 02 TRASH NC)f NOf 1 COACHELLA VALLEY C 1 CP 1 ENCLOSURE CARPORT CARPORT TRASH ENCLOSURE CARPORT *4WATER DISTRICT/ C // SETBACK LINE I POWER POLE TO- 04 ,r x 06 _ _ PERIMETER LANDSCAPIN : UNDERGROUND, I CP 1 Jtr`ash` MT CP CP CPC CP CP HC HC CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP P P Jtr`ash` CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP rn p CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP C / SETBACK MINIMUM 10'-0" CREOCTYP. IQ 111 II I IIII1 I -i 1111I11I1III� 1I -CP >>I/I c t � � � ° ° ° o ° /o / / / a° H / C / o r/Cy / / /° ° °vn / / � " / / �S r. ` / / / / ATED i O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O O O O O O O OO o 0 a0 O o 0 OO o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ° o OCP CP ° LAWN / / // 176,,/, PROPERTY LINE t 0 �N) HYDRA T� ° °°oSTOP &�HELTER CP >wi-(N) HYDRANT CP rpCP FV CP CP C o P CPCODESERTSCAPE ° P o °o' CP 26' FEV FEV o CP CP ° CPStor ° 1 ° °DRIVE ° PCP o ° �6'BIdg.3 FEV FEV o CP CP PUTTING °CP o VP F1 0 2 Story AIRPORT ° °COURSE IMAGE CORRIDOREIGHT RESTRICTION CPI CP FEV FEV ° O o ° ° °CP CP o ° P p24 Units Total o ° o CP CP FEV ° ° CP CP ° CP Bldg. 1 o CP CPCP rPROPERTY LINE 2 Story CP o CP CP FEV FEV ° °16 Units Total o ° CP Bldg. o CP CP CP CP FEV ° / 0 C CP RETENTION BASIN- o 2 Story DESERTSCAPE o FEV o Bldg. 11 Bldg. 12 0°cCP CP ° ° G 44 Bldg. 10 o CP CP o CP ° P16 Units Total 1: FEV FEV ° °OO °° ° ° 2 Story CP CP o 24 c /CP CPCP CP ADA PATH LAWN o FEV 16 Units Total Units Total FEV ° 16 Units Total CP ° °cP CP CPCP CP o OF TRAVEL o ° ° SHADED FEV °° FEV CP CP °° HC CP 0 o o o ° oCP °0 0 0 O 0 TOT LOT O O / CP ° FEV CP CP O ulp HC CPCP ° ° °° FEV FEV ° WN CARPORT CP CP DESERTSCAPE °° °Sto °° ° o p° / CP CP FEV O O°O O ° CP Mail °°° °oo o°oo 0 °P °� CPo NA o o BICYCLE RA /CP PED GATE ° N) ° FEV ° CP o FEV P CP HYDRANT o °/ O O O O o o O O O ° 0 0 0 0 PoolDeckAREA FEVFEV °° CP CP FIRE PIT Bldg. 4 o oN ° 7,059 SF o (N) Hfor CPIle FEV ° o 0 o Q o ° DESERTSCAPE CP 24 Units Total FEV o 6) 7y,° 2tras ° p 0 C POOI pa p w UM FEV ° ° CP CPo 0 ° 1,343 SF W �I NIG O o ENCLOSP O�6 N 35 24 CP / CP WAT R FEAURE o o °W o I I TCP O Clubhouse 0' o ° °° ° Ilk - C) SEE ANDSCAPE WGS FIRE PITo ° CP J°CP W zI i r8'R 38'R o 1 Story o°° °o P CP ° ° CP o CALL ° °oFEV CP ° CP ° °P ° / P 'A/ ° co BOX 38'R oI -w�FEV °AWN p C CP N FEV VA °KNOX i NA LAWN ° ° P CP CARPORT HICLE)GATECPMBOX VF ° 0 ° °FEV p P ° �yZ" CP / RASH ° °` CPO N o FEV O CP CP ENCLOSU Oo0 I P P P P P P P HC > °°°° BBQ AREA o FEV HC CP CP CP Q z o1 I - COMMCOMMUNi Y o ° ° ° FEV ° o CP CP ° F" -(LOO z ATISPLAY BOA Do FEV o W/ KNOX B X 00 0 0 0 0 ° O O O O o O O° ° or °°NN DESERTSCAPE o ° ° CP SETBACCPo o ACCESSIBLE OIn Mp P o o FEV FEV ° CP Z SITE SIGN PER o CP PER CVWDw DECEL P P ° - FEV ° CP �o LANE CBC 1109A.8.8 O I o ° o ° °o ° FEV °° CP U o o ° CP CP o P ° o O o St 00 °° FEV FEV CP o ° ` ° ° ° CP CP ° Bldg. 9 °° °RIBldg. 5 FEV a oz FEV CP O o 2 Story O ORETENTION BASIN - P 2 Story p ° - ° FEV CP ° 24 Units Total CP 0 24 Units Total ° 3 °17' O CPo 0 P ° o FE 0 CP ° O FEV CP ° for oP DCP CP15' o DESERTSCAPE St(N) HYDRNTo 0 0IMAGE CORRIDOR HEIGHT RESTRICTION 0 o o CP ° O O O o 0 0 0 C n n n o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O o o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 0 o O°°°o P Bldg. 8 CP aP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP 2 Story o CP DESERTSCAPE 20 Units Total CARPORT ° CP DESERTSCAPE CARPORT 9' LIMAGE CORRIDOR w CP°° HT RESTRICTION LINE OF IMAGE CORRIDOR ° ° CPHEIGHT RESTRICTION TRASH ENCLOSURE ° CP LINE OF IMAGE CORRIDOR PROPERTY LINE ISPLAY BOARD -ZCP W/ KNOX BOX° NCcoMMUNITHEIGHT RESTRICTION z CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP CP ° CP CP CP C P= CIT -UP C CP -TP ()CP ° PER RCFD ° ° - °o HYDRAN CP CP o° 0°00 °°°o 000° °°O °o°° o°° o° ° CP °°° ° CP o DESERTSCAPE ° PORT o ° ° BUILDING ° °° CP ARo C o °, CP CP20' SETBACK LINE CP CP 0 = o. ° 11' " 2$' 14' O ° ° Cp ° o - O _ / Q�Q CP o ° c0 ° DRIVE CP 73'-9" w o CP _ 1 Bldg.7 � CP PERIMETER o ° i i Bldg. 6E ° w CP I LANDSCAPING TBACK o ° VEG LE 2 Story � PICKLEBALL CP 1 I - E 2 Story PED ° PED 24 Units Total �_ Dog Park I POWER POLE TO -t-411 NOTE: MINIMUM 10'-0" SETBACK, O 24 Units Total _ C� AVERAGE 20'-0" SETBACK � AT GAT for St o w �_ - UNDERGROUND, I SEE SPECIFIC PLANiF w I St r r- TYP. I I I ADDITIONAL INFORMAT ON Q NOx ° - - - - - O 6\BLOCK WALL` �' _ - ° BOX ° ACCESSIBLE _ �_ � � rf~ - - - - - - - DESERTSCAPE °'' ° SITE SIGN PER - 652 15r- N - - - - - - - - - - N o ONUME ° _ _ - - _ -f- N84°34'33"E PERIMETER "' - to o IGN ° ��'1'e�� -B o w LANDSCAPING SETBACK - - - - 100.00)�E� N - - - — — - PRO P - SETBACK, --o- ----- .10 (RI04 1634"W 116--------------- ---------- - -- - � - � - N84°34�'J� � � +0.80 (N84 35'07"E 74u.80' a W� \/ PER NOTE MINIMUM 10' 0" SETB K --- - -------------------------------------- � v AVERAGE 20'-0" SETBACK N89 5903 W 100.0 _ •61) R6 _ ---- ___ PROPERTY LINE SEE SPECIFIC PLAN FOR N8 °1 ,23„W N _ - = - - (NOT A PART) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (N89°59'27"W 127.64') R6 .78' R(� 00 - N44�21'06"W I N89°58'03"W 127.79' ------------------ - - ---------------- - - --- ° ° EXTERIOR SIDE YARD PROPERTY LINE -- == POWER POLE TO (E) VERTICAL CREST€L--CICATED--V-ERTICAL-CREST----------- N89 5893 uv 117:5 (N88 59'33 W 11� (3 52'R5) �) INTERIOR SIDE YARD SETBACK TO BE REMOVED (IMAGE CORRIDOR) BE UNDERGROUND, SIDEYARD SETBACK: MINIMUM S-0" SETBACK PLUS V-0" FOR EVERY RIGHT-OF-WAY PER PARCEL MAP MAXIMUM SETBACK OF 25'-0" TYP. FOOT OVER 17'-0” IN BUILDING HEIGHT, MAXIMUM SETBACK OF 10'-0" - -Te- 1327.90'(1327.59') R2, R3 _ - - AVENUE 50 Common Area Calculations UNIT MIX Parking Calcs PARKING RATIOS Area (SF) Unit Type Unit Name Qty Area (SF) Total (SF) Qty PARKING LEGEND: PER LQMC 9.60.260 (K) BY -RIGHT PARKING INCENTIVE, THE FOLLOWING PARKING RATIOS SHALL APPLY TO THE ENTIRE 1, First Floor 1 -Bed Apartment 1A -ADA 34 673 22,882 C 8 C = COMPACT PARKING SPACE (8.5'X 16') DEVELOPMENT (INCLUDING MARKET -RATE UNITS) CLUBHOUSE RESIDENT ACTIVITY 978 1 -Bed Apartment 1A -STD 30 673 20,190 CP 300 CP = COVERED STANDARD PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') 1 -BR UNITS: 1 SPACE PER UNIT REQUIRED X 132 = 132 SPACES Fire Riser MECHANICAL 12 1 -Bed Apartment 1 B -ADA 34 755 25,670 FEV 50 FEV = FUTURE EV PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') 2 -BR UNITS: 1.5 SPACES PER UNIT REQUIRED X 120 = 180 SPACES GYM RESIDENT ACTIVITY 725 1 -Bed Apartment 1B -STD 34 755 25,670 FEV HC 1 FEV HC =FUTURE EV ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') +5' AISLE TOTAL REQUIRED: 312 SPACES HALL CIRCULATION 186 2 -Bed Apartment 2A -ADA 68 960 65,280 FEV VAN 1 FEV VAN =FUTURE EV VAN PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') +8' AISLE HK SERVICE 36 2 -Bed Apartment 2A -STD 52 960 49,920 Office ADMINISTRATION 290 252 209,612 sq ft HC 8 HC = ACCESSIBLE STANDARD PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') +5' AISLE PARKING PROVIDED HC Van 2 HC VAN =ACCESSIBLE VAN PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') +8' AISLE RR RESTROOMS 124 7 GUEST PARKING SPACES FOR COMMUNITY BUILDING Shower RESTROOMS 68 Mail 1 MAIL = DESIGNATED MAIL VAN PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') DENSITY CALCULATIONS Stor SERVICE 111 BASE DENSITY: 14.03 ACRES x 12 UNITS/ACRE = 168 BASE UNITS P 151 P =STANDARD PARKING SPACE (9'X 19') (9'X 17') 132 SPACES PER 1 -BED UNIT (1 SPACE PER UNIT) Wet Bar CIRCULATION 36 TOTAL UNITS PROPOSED: 252 UNITS 522 180 SPACES PER 2 -BED UNIT (2 SPACES PER UNIT) WH MECHANICAL 12 312 REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FOR UNITS 50% DENSITY BONUS IS BEING PROPOSED 312 PROVIDED PARKING SPACES FOR UNITS 2,578 sq ft 14.03 ACRES x 18 UNITS/ACRE = 252 PROPOSED UNITS PARKING FACILITY BREAKDOWN 0.80 GUEST SPACES PER UNIT PROVIDED FOR 50% DENSITY BONUS, 44% OF BASE UNITS NEED TO BE MODERATE UNCOVERED STANDARD PARKING SPACES: 145 SPACES INCLUDES 0 FEV SPACES 203 TOTAL GUEST SPACES PROVIDED INCOME UNITS BASED ON LQMC 9.60.260 DENSITY BONUS PERCENTAGES. UNCOVERED COMPACT PARKING SPACES: 8 SPACES INCLUDES 0 FEV SPACES 44% x 168 = 74 MODERATE INCOME UNITS UNCOVERED ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES: 7 SPACES INCLUDES 2 FEV SPACES 522 TOTAL PARKING SPACES PROVIDED CARPORT STANDARD PARKING SPACES: 350 SPACES INCLUDES 50 FEV SPACES MARKET -RATE UNITS 178 CARPORT ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES: 5 SPACES INCLUDES 0 FEV SPACES MINIMUM REQUIRED MODERATE UNITS 74 TOTAL SPACES 522 SPACES 52 FEV SPACES MAXIMUM UNITS ALLOWED W/ DENSITY BONUS 252 PAIRWIN PARTNERS A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 / CP w -�#— U- / 6' BLOCK WALL ')-R4-- PER CBC TABLE 504.3 ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT IN FEET ABOVE GRADE PLANE TYPE V-A R-2 S (WITHOUT AREA INCREASE) 70 FEET ALLOWED PER CBC TABLE 504.4 ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF STORIES ABOVE GRADE PLANE TYPE V-A R-2 S (WITHOUT AREA INCREASE) = 4 STORIES ALLOWED PER CBC TABLE 506.2 ALLOWABLE AREA FACTOR TYPE V-A R-2 SM (WITHOUT HEIGHT INCREASE) = 36,000 SF PER FLOOR ALLOWED NFPA13 SPRINKLER SYSTEM COMPLYING WITH CBC SECTION 903.3.1.1 ALL BUILDINGS COMPLY WITH REQUIREMENTS ABOVE 0 16' 32' 64' Site Plan NSCALE: 1/32" = V-0" 7�7 Site Plan A01 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 31 02 0 an M 60 SF 1A -ADA 1A -ADA O 1B -ADA 1113 -ADA L1A-ADA 1 A -ADA p #LavlPi� Pool De 7,059 SF Ir GYM ow r zs sF ow r R r Stor R r a ffice 111 SF Office H a Wet Bar 36 HALL CLUBHOUSE 978 SF a 01 1 6 S I I I 2A -ADA I I L 60 SF 60 SF 60 SF 1A -ADA 1 B -ADA 1 B -ADA 1A -ADA 1 B -ADA BLDG 6 I 1 A-ADALlDA 1 B -ADA i 1 A -ADA 1 B -ADA L - 60 S - 60 S 60 SF 1A -ADA 1A ADA 1A -ADA 1 B -ADA BLDj1A-ADdA1'1,,,, 1A -ADA 1A -ADA 1B-ADAS 7:]Z60 0 1A -ADA 1A -ADA 02 - 1 2A -ADA LEGEND PROPOSED ENCLOSURE LOCATION FOR METERS AND SWITCHGEAR EQUIPMENT m�I P1� IRWIN PARTNERS M� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 2A -ADA 2A -ADA C© I 2A -ADA 6 SF 2A -ADA 1 B-ADAS °: Spa 1 B -ADA IDS BLDG 4 1 0 1 B -ADA 1 B -ADA S 02 1 01 0 1 B -ADA 1 1 B -ADA 6 2A -ADA 2A -ADA 6 S 02 1 03 1 2A -ADA S 2A -ADA a BLDG 10 2A -ADA S 2A -ADA r a 1 B -ADA 1 B -ADA 2A -ADA 2A -ADA La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 M M 1Q/Jfi T-0" x 8'-0" DO W/ FIRE RISER SIGNA First Floor Plan SCALE: 1" = 30' 4" RISER 18" CLEAR TYP. FIRE RISER ENLARGED PLAN SCALE: 1/2" = 1'-0" First Floor Plan A02 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 I / 1 I 1 I I 1 / 02 �. ° / I I I / I 6 2A -STD 2A -STD s A_ VOV 1 . — = 1 F 1 — — 1 / I- r r Stor II 2A -STD S 1A -STD 1A -STD 02 1B -STD 1A -STD 1A -STD 1A -STD 1B -STD 1A -STD 2A -STD / 1 1 S 0 1 S 6 2A -STD 2A -STD BLDG 3 10 _ ° 2A -STD 2A -STD 2A -STD 2A -STD / 1 for f'� 1B -STD 1A -STD 1A -STD 1A -STD 1B -STD 1A -STD is or S tor S— 0 0 /� ° BLDG 1 1 S to t t ° 1A -STD 1A -STD ( , � 1 SF 61 � 2A -STD S `y`�� 1 B -STD to 1 B -STD 4 , 1 0 BLDG 2 1° 0 02 6 2A -STD 1 1 B -STD 1 B -STD / 1 6 2A -STD 2A -STD s a BLDG 11 s BLDG 12 s / 1A -STD 1A -STD r BLDG 10 ° 1B -STD ° 1 1A -ST 1 1 s 1 s ROOF 1 " Stor II BELOW 2A -STD S ' ° 1A -STD / II or 2A -STD 2A -STD S St1 B -STD 1n 6 6 2A -STD 1 1 U u s S / I 1 B -STD 1 B -STD 1 S -' 6 So 1A -STD III I 1A -STD 1A -STD Stor _ 2A -STD 1 / I 01 60 SF 60 SF 0 S `�' 1A -STD S �:��:::jjjj�� 2A -STD / 1 03 0 1 B -STD 1 B -STD 1 �p 1 1 B -STD 6S s AI& 2A -STD 6 2A -STD 02 or 1 B -STD !' -------------- ------ I /4 PER 1/4 PE 1 B -STD 1 B -STD S 6 ClubhouseI I Below ----------- I o r I 2A -STD I 1 2A -STD I I I BLDG 4 s I - it r 10 I a 1 B -STD -E:R 1/4 PF 5L FT FT > s 1 / 1 B -STD S 1 B -STD 1 J 1A -STD / I 1 B -STD g . a � 1 / 11 B -STD o to BLDG 9 2A -STD 0 01 0 1 B -STD 1A -STD T 1 0S S / 03 1 , I6SF 66S 6SF 66 S 6SF 66S 1 2A -STD 2A -STD � 2A -STD t 2A -STD 2A -STD 2A -STD 2A -STD tc 2A -STD S 02 6 2A -STD 1 1 BLDG 5 1 2A -STD S 2A -STD 2A -STD S r S /' 10 2A -STD 2A -STD 2A -ST 2A -STD 2A -STD 2A -STD 2A -ADA 6 I It S 2A -STD 2A -STD / 6SF 66S 6SF — 66S 6SF 66S ° 902� 2A-ADA 6 t2A-ADA/ 2A-STD i 1 6 1 BLDG $ 1A -ADA 6SF a /' 2A -ADA t S I 6 2A -ADA / 1A -ADA S I / 1 2A -ADA 2A -ADA � I 0 / 1 6 '0� 2A -ADA / 1 1 I 1 v 6SF = - _ = 66S 6 r �r � r 2A -STD 1B -STD 1A -STD 1A -STD 1B -STD 2A -STD 1A -STD 1 B -STD 1 B -STD 1A -STD 1 B -STD 2A -STD 1S ----- 10 BLDG 7 10 1 01 1 / I1 S 2A -STD 1B -STD 1A -STD 1A -STD 1B -STD 2A -STD 1 1A -STD 1 B -STD 1 B -STD 1A -STD 1 B -STD 2A -STD t t t-- J t t t r __---- I 66 S 6SF - -- —— 0 — ° — — l m�I P1� IRWIN PARTNERS M� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village. LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 Second Floor Plan SCALE: 1" = 30' Second Floor Plan A03 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 33 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ BLDG 5 r-1 r-1 r-1 r-1 LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ LJ -------��-- F ---------------------ter Zone CP I I Zone CP Zone CP L Zone CP Al I� A2 A3 1,1II 1,486 SF 16 SF 1,829 SF I I I I r---------- ----------------------1F------- 1 I II I I I I II I I I I II I L ------J L----------JL---------------------J B5 1 932S 1 I I I Zone CP 93B4 1SF Zone CP 133 740 SF I I Zone CP 132 928 SF so Zone CP 131 9388 SF �I 1 Ir _ 1 / L ----i r------------1r-----------1r----------,r--------- II II II II II -----------JL----------JL----------JL----------J II II II II I SOLAR READY ROOF: LEGEND NO DIMENSION LESS THAN 5'-0" EACH SUBAREA MUST BE AT LEAST 160 SF IF TOTAL ROOF AREA EXCEEDS 10,000 SF SOLAR READY ZONE SOLAR ZONE ON STEEP SLOPED ROOFS MUST BE ORIENTED BETWEEN 110 AND 270 DEGREES OF F--1 TRUE NORTH, ORIENTATION DOES NOT APPLY ON ROOFS SLOPED LESS THAN 2:12 HVAC CONDENSERS MUST BE FREE OF ROOF PENETRATIONSAND ROOF MOUNTED EQUIPMENT MIN. 15% OF TOTAL ROOF AREA IS REQ'D TO BE SOLAR READY, EXCLUDING ANY SKYLIGHT AREA ------------------------------------ FIRE ACCESS, 4'-0" CLEAR MIN. CARPORT ROOF BELOW TOTAL ROOF AREA INCLUDES ROOF/OVERHANG OF THE BUILDING OR ROOF/OVERHANG OF ANOTHER STRUCTURE LOCATED WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR ON COVERED PARKING INSTALLED WITH THE BUILDING PROJECT TOTAL ROOF AREA: 214,504 SF SOLAR READY MINIMUM: 15% OF TOTAL ROOF AREA SOLAR READY MIN. REQUIRED: 32,176 SF SOLAR READY PROVIDED: 32,176 SF SOLAR READY ZONES ARE LOCATED ON CARPORTS ONLY, NO SOLAR ON BUILDING ROOFS NSI IA IRWIN PARTNERS 0� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING �I Zone CP 136 939 SF Zone CP 137 932 SF Zone CP 138 I 928 SF Ir � I I I I 1 � 1 I 1 r or Zone CP 2 1.143 SF GENERAL NOTES: - PER LA QUINTAVILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN, PARAPET WALLS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 5' TALL TO SCREEN/HIDE HVAC EQUIPMENT - SEE SHEET A21 FOR LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAMS - PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS SHALL MEET MINIMUM QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN JOINT APPENDIX JA11 (2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE) - PRELIMINARY SOLAR CARPORT SHOWN ABOVE. FINAL LAYOUT TO BE DETERMINED La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 I I I L----- -----------------� I I I Zone CP D5 2,172 SF 7 / Zone CP / D4 2,172 SF / / / Roof Plan SCALE: 1" = 30' Roof Plan PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 34 � J( Zone CP 2 1.143 SF GENERAL NOTES: - PER LA QUINTAVILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN, PARAPET WALLS SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF 5' TALL TO SCREEN/HIDE HVAC EQUIPMENT - SEE SHEET A21 FOR LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAMS - PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS SHALL MEET MINIMUM QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS AS SPECIFIED IN JOINT APPENDIX JA11 (2019 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE) - PRELIMINARY SOLAR CARPORT SHOWN ABOVE. FINAL LAYOUT TO BE DETERMINED La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 I I I L----- -----------------� I I I Zone CP D5 2,172 SF 7 / Zone CP / D4 2,172 SF / / / Roof Plan SCALE: 1" = 30' Roof Plan PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 34 UP 2 Bed - Standard 2 ASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 2 Bed - ADA 2 ASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" ��I PAIRWIN PARTNERS E� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING ECOND FLOOR UNITS - STANDARD II 1 A At A11 I - All 1 Bed - Standard 1BSCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" GROUND FLOOR UNITS - ACCESSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH CBC 11A ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS 10'-2" I, 14'-4" I, 5'-4" La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 1 BSCALE: 1 Bed - ADA 1 /4" = 1'-0" c a 10'-10" 6'-5" 4'-0" A 1 Bed - Standard 27'-3" 1 Bed - ADA 1 ASCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Unit Plans A05 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 35 05Clubhouse Floor Plan SC ALE: 1/4', = 1'-0" IN0 0�I P1� IRWIN PARTNERS MMA R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING POOL DECK 20'-0" Above Finish Grade UL V L/I xf-x I I V L EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. STUCCO REGLET OClubhouse - Front Elevation 4 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Nelffel OgL+ 2 Roof Plan 01L+011 1 First Floor 03SCALE: Clubhouse - Right Elevation 1/4" = 1'-0" �T.vw VLVVI%r IIVL EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. 0 Clubhouse - Rear Elevation 2 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" 20'-0" Above Finish Grade 111\L I\IVLI\ VLI./VI\Pl1 I VL VI IV I ILI\V La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 01 Clubhouse - Left Elevation SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" k+11'-0" 2 Roof Plan j. J,+O" 1 First Floor SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Clubhouse PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 36 11ACTA1 -r=1 1 IQ 1)0- r%" nA, LJ—:—I-t r'rlAlr'CCTC TII C CrlllClAlf- L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L VINYL WINDOW L FIBER GLASS L --AWNING L TUBE STEEL RAILING L DECORATIVE L UULUR SCHEME 1 L STUCCO REGLET FRENCH DOOR FABRIC PAINTED BLACK, TYP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. 01 mot! � IPAIRWIN PARTNERS 0� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. 7rrFimiFmi T1,011-111 Til &+22' T.O_PL 3 Roof o� OL+11' T.O. Pl--� �` 2 Second Floor Bldg 1 Left Elevation 1 0 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" [I 1 First Floor CONCRETE TILE ROOFING 28'-0" Max. Height F.G. OL+22' 3 Roof +11' 2 Second Floor F.G� OL ±0.1 �� 1 First Floor 0 Bldg 1 Front Elevation 4SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" r�rr+rn[+rn kll +l — 701 !VI RA..., Lj-;-I-� METALTRELLIS STUCCO RECESS Li (I ll�li�l�l ❑Ci�OVEREM.E=.w� moo� � � � BNEEZEW) Yll DECORATIVE SHUTTERS VINYL WINDOW L DECORATIVE EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. TUBE STEEL RAILING PAINTED BLACK, TYP. WOOD CORBELS FIBER GLASS FRENCH DOOR La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 COLOR SCHEME 1 OBldg 1 Right Elevation 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" STUCCO REGLET F. G. +22' 3 Roof 16+11' 2 Second Floor +a„ "ffll First Floor 0 Bldg 1 Rear Elevation 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 1 -Elevations A07 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 37 mot! � IPAIRWIN PARTNERS 0� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING r-- METAL TRELLIS 28'-0" Max. Height r-- CONCRETE TILE ROOFING r-- STUCCO RECESS 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. — FRENCH DOOR FIRE RISER EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. OIL+22' T.O. PL 3 Roof OL +11' T.O. PL 2 Second Floor OL +011 1 First Floor Bldg 2 Left Elevation 1 0 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" /1/10.1/1m CTC T11 C "-:-LL I VUL J I LLL 1\f11 LIIVV PAINTED BLACK, TYP. METAL TRELLIS COLOR SCHEME 2 WOOD BRACKETS OL+22' 3 Roof co _ 1 m +11' OL O 2 Second Floor OL +01, 1 First Floor 0 Bldg 2 Front Elevation 8SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" 28'-0" Max_ Height F- RECESSED NICHE 01L+22' T.O. PIL,,L_ 3 Roof 67 +11' T.O. PL 2 Second Floor +oll 1 First Floor DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L WOOD CORBELS OBldg 2 Right Elevation 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" L STUCCO REGLET DECORATIVE TUBE STEEL RAILING L VINYL WINDOW SCHEME 2 L FIBER GLASS EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. PAINTED BLACK, TYP. FRENCH DOOR La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 01L+22' 3 Roof IN. mOIL O 2 Second Floor F.G� OL+011 1 First Floor 05SCALE: Bldg 2 Rear Elevation 1/8" = 1'-0" SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 2 - Elevations PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 38 03 28'-0" Max. Height Above Finish Grade METAL TRELLIS r f-%K1f`m CTC TII C CllrICIAI/"` 28'-0" Max. Height 77 OL+22' 3 Roof r` OL 2 Second Floor F.G�.Vo, 1 First Floor L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L VINYL WINDOW L FIBER GLASS L TUBE STEEL RAILING L DECORATIVE L SCHEME 1 L STUCCO REGLET FRENCH DOOR PAINTED BLACK, TYP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. 0 El mn[E METAL TRELLIS I 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. t 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. OL+22' 03 T.O. PLS 3 Roof SII= OL+11' T.O. 2 Second Floor PLS ml❑per First Floor Bldg 3 Left Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 Bldg 3 Front Elevation 4SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. STUCCO RECESS7 CONCRETE TILE ROOFING 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. OBldg 3 Right Elevation 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" 7 OL+22' 3 Roof 2 .� +11' 2 Second Floor COVERED CO IERED _ COV RED BREEZE W ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ �RE ZEWAY � ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Br EWA Y � ❑ F.G.OL 1 First Floor DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L DECORATIVE VINYL WINDOW L TUBE STEEL RAILING SCHEME 1 L FIBER GLASS L STUCCO REGLET EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. PAINTED BLACK, TYP. FRENCH DOOR 0 Bldg 3 Rear Elevation 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" mot! � IPAIRWIN PARTNERS 0� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 3 -Elevations A09 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 39 -,R'_n,, nnay Height A.F.G. 0�I P1� IRWIN PARTNERS MMA R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING BUILDING 4-A +22'� 3 Roof 2 Second Floor' +011 1 First Floor F 04 VINYL WINDOW 1 VUL V I LLL I\(II LIIVV PAINTED BLACK, TYP. BUILDING 4-B 28'-0" Max. Hei hc1 tA.F.G. I 01L+22' 3 Roof +11' 2 Second Floor F.C3�. oL+011 1 First Floor 0 Bldg 4 Rear Elevation Overall 4 SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. CONCRETE TILE ROOFING I 0 'ERED —F I rms 17[ FFI 11 Ll 1 2 STUCCO REGLET L DECORATIVE L TUBE STEEL RAILING L SCHEME 2 EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. PAINTED BLACK, TYP. FIBER GLASS FRENCH DOOR O Bldg 4 Rear Elevation A SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" -1. nn ne___ 11_._.I_i P9�n[\ m nllnl 1r 021 CONCRETE TILE ROOFING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 I IULI\ VL/-lVV FRENCH DOOR OBldg 4 South Elevation 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" VLV VI\/ -ll I V L EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. +22, 3 Roof a> co 2 1 0� 04 m +111 O OL 2 Second Floor +oll F.G. 1 First Floor DECORATIVE SHUTTER 0 Bldg 4 Rear Elevation B SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 4 - Elevations A10 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 40 0�I P1� IRWIN PARTNERS MMA R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING BUILDING 4-B 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. BUILDING 4-A 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. SCHEME 2 +22' 3 Roo If C?_ +11' N 2 Second Floor O +011 1 First Floor F.G. 28'-0" Max. Height hove Finish Grad VLVV -I I V L EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP SCHEME 2 1 - V 1 LLL I \(l 11 - PAINTED BLACK, TYP. 0 Bldg 4 Front Elevation Overall 4SCALE: 3/32" = 1'-0" V I VVVV 1\LULL I 1 IVLI\ VL - FRENCH DOOR0 I/ 3Bldg 4 Front Elevation B SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 28'-0" Max. Height OBldg 4 North Elevation 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" CONCRETE TILE ROOFING BREEZEVA FE -01 N ni nil IFF11 I IT ni I LE N r 5-11 11111 --------- I " TUBE STL. RAILING PAINTED BLACK, TYP. STUCCO REGLET La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 DECORATIVE EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. 0 o,L+22' 3 Roof OIL+ O 2 Second Floor +011 F.G. 1 First Floor Bldg 4 Front Elevation A O SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 4 - Elevations A11 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 41 28'-0" Max. Height CONC. TILE ROOFING 28'-0" Max. Height L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L VINYL WINDOW L FIBER GLASS L- DECORATIVE L SCHEME 1 L STUCCO REGLET L TUBE STL. RAILING FRENCH DOOR EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. PAINTED BLACK, TYP. 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. 28'-0" Max. Height Bldg 5 Left Elevation 1 0 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" RACTAI -MMM 1 ICS CONC. TILE ROOFING OBldg 5 Front Elevation 4SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. 28'-0" Max. Height L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L VINYL WINDOW L FIBER GLASS L DECORATIVE 6UHHMH 1 L STUCCO REGLET L TUBE STL. RAILING FRENCH DOOR EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. PAINTED BLACK, TYP. 0�I P1� IRWIN PARTNERS MMA R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 OBldg 5 Right Elevation 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" 0 Bldg 5 Rear Elevation 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" OL+22' 3 Roof 'm cD = +11' O OL 2 Second Floor F.G� 01L±011 1 First Floor +27'-611 01L+22' 3 Roof TW 2 _1 0 N a`) +11' O OL 2 Second Floor �+oll G 1 First Floor SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 5 - Elevations Al2 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 42 28'-0" Max. Height Above Finish Gra'e fIt"011!`m CTC TII C mr1%r1%E1K1f__ METAL TRELLIS 28'-0" Max. Height +22' 3 Roof m m+11' O 2 Second Floor F.G OL ±0.1 1 First Floor L STUCCO REGLET L VINYL WINDOW L TUBE STEEL RAILING L DECORATIVE L SCHEME 2 L FIBER GLASS L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS PAINTED BLACK, TYP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. FRENCH DOOR mot! � IPAIRWIN PARTNERS 0� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING WOOD BRACKETS Max. Height STUCCO r STUCCO RECESS A.F.G. I AL AL Ab Ab Ak A '3 Roof [7E � imuu•mo.I.I.I.u.l.l.l.u.o.l.l.l.u.ul.l.uu.u�u � �.1111111111111111111.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.I.1.1.1. - . . . . I-� 1 u u I"'S ".. CALE: 1/8" V-0 28'-0" Max. Height /1llA1l1OCTC TII C m!1l1CIA1l1 06 Q 0 Bldg 6 Front Elevation 4SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. FFC11F[F1Fol FE 0 1 7IIIIF 'I [11 ni I Fill IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIICill - AACTAI T CI 1 ICS I OIL+22' T.O._PL 3 Roof OL +11, T.O._PL 2 Second Floor 1 First Floor OBldg 6 Right Elevation 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" STUCCO RECESS L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L TUBE STEEL RAILING VINYL WINDOW SCHEME 2 L DECORATIVE L FIBER GLASS L WOOD CORBELS STUCCO REGLET PAINTED BLACK, TYP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. FRENCH DOOR La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 O Bldg 6 Rear Elevation 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" OL+22' 3 Roof It 2) m +11' O OL 2 Second Floor F.Gl� C±0° 1 First Floor SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 6 - Elevations A13 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 43 CONCRETE TILE ROOFING 28'-0" Max. Height L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L VINYL WINDOW L FIBER GLASS L TUBE STEEL RAILING L DECORATIVE L COLOR SCHEME 1 L STUCCO REGLET FRENCH DOOR PAINTED BLACK, TYP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. 00- nn RA-- U—;—k+ CC('CCC CfI Alit LIC 11ACTA1 TCI 1 IC 11101 nll nA— 1111INoBld9s 7 & 12 Left Elevation 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" r1r%K1P r:)== TII C Ml1r1C1A1l1 STUCCO RECESS 0 Bldgs 7 & 12 Front Elevation 4SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" nOl nn .A.... LJ ..:... L.l rlr/lrnn rrl KII^I Ir OL+22' 3 Roof 2) a) > OL O 2 Second Floor OL+0 , 1 First Floor 28'-0" Max. Height Bldgs 7 & 12 Right Elevation O 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L WOOD CORBELS L VINYL WINDOW L FIBER GLASS L TUBE STL. RAILING L DECORATIVE GOLOR 6GHHMH 1 L STUCCO REGLET FRENCH DOOR PAINTED BLACK, TYP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. �PA IRWIN PARTNERS rim - 245 A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 OBldgs 7 & 12 Rear Elevation 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" OL+22' 3 Roof If 2) ro_ P' - O> 2 Second Floor F.GI MAY' 1 First Floor SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldgs. 7 & 12 - Elevations A14 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 44 28'-0" Max. Height Above Finish Grade CONCRETE TILE ROOFING 28'-0" Max. Height Above Finish Grade C+22' 3 Roof 'm c9 2 r` +11' O OL 2 Second Floor F.G�. C±0" 1 First Floor L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L VINYL WINDOW L FIBER GLASS L TUBE STEEL RAILING L- DECORATIVE L COLOR SCHEME 2 L STUCCO REGLET FRENCH DOOR PAINTED BLACK, TYP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. 11111-ur! nel n" ne.... "" "'v"' Bldg 8 Lett Elevation 1 0 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 Bldg 8 Front Elevation 4SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. r-- METAL TRELLIS r-- STUCCO RECESS 28'-0" Max. Heiaht r-- CONCRETE TILE ROOFING OBldg 8 Right Elevation 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" FRENCH`DOOR v � vvvv � "v" mot! � IPAIRWIN PARTNERS 0� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING PAINTED BLACK, TYP. La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. O Bldg 8 Rear Elevation 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" OL+22' 3 Roof P m OL+11' O 2 Second Floor F.G�C+0„ "ffll First Floor DECORATIVE SHUTTERS SCHEME 1: n�r��oc�n STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 8 - Elevations A15 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 45 DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L DECORATIVE L TUBE STEEL RAILING L VINYL WINDOW L- FIBER GLASS L COLOR SCHEME 1 L STUCCO REGLET EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. PAINTED BLACK, TYP. FRENCH DOOR —rn — K-1 it —1 — nA_.. 1MMA-- vvvvv vviw�w Bldg 9 Left Elevation 1 0 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" 0 Bldg 9 - Front Elevation 4SCALE:1/8" = 1'-0" 28'-0" Max. Height !1llA1l1OCTC TII C m!1!\C1A111 11ACTA1 TOCI 1 ICS 1f0- All RA.... U..:... l..a CTI 1/ 111-% mmrlmclo OBldg 9 Right Elevation 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L TUBE STEEL RAILING L VINYL WINDOW L- DECORATIVE L- FIBER GLASS GULOK SGHHME 1 L STUCCO REGLET PAINTED BLACK, TYP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. FRENCH DOOR mot! � IPAIRWIN PARTNERS 0� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 0 Bldg 9 Rear Elevation 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" A-'�+22' 3 Roof +11, 2 Second Floor ±0.1 F.G. 1 First Floor �+22' 3 Roof +11, 2 Second Floor +0.. F.G. 1 First Floor SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 9 - Elevations A16 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 46 METAL TRELLIS mot! � IPAIRWIN PARTNERS 0� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L VINYL WINDOW L TUBE STEEL RAILING L FIBER GLASS L DECORATIVE L COLOR SCHEME 1 L STUCCO REGLET PAINTED BLACK, TYP. FRENCH DOOR EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. \A/PlPlrl MMAl IZ/r n 7521 r)" rA-- LJ..i-kf n�c nc+ Kll1 l 1r Bldg 10 Left Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" METAL TRELLIS 1 1 t 1-tiIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIii 28'-0" Max. Height CONCRETE TILE ROOFING Above Finish Grade IIIIIIIIIII II OIL+22' 3 Roof m (D +11' O OL 2 Second Floor +011 1 First Floor Bldg 10 - Front Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" C`TI 1/1/,/l r]C/'CC n nO- nll A A.... U..:... L.l 0 0 0 ]Jill w � m I T111Fn1 I ...... ..... 111111111 J�Fj] mm Ilm Ini. P11 0 111111�Fll FnIPI 711Pil Eli IFIJI a oil DECORATIVE SHUTTERS VINYL WINDOW L FIBER GLASS TUBE STEEL RAILING L DECORATIVE L COLOR SCHEME 1 L STUCCO REGLET FRENCH DOOR PAINTED BLACK, TYP. EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 Bldg 10 Right Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" OL+22' 3 Roof P m+11' O 2 Second Floor OL +011 1 First Floor Bldg 10 Rear Elevation SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 10 - Elevations A17 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 47 KACTAI TCI 1 IQ !111lA1r1CCTC TII C r-)111l1CIA1l1 701 nn RA— LJ..:...I..♦ L DECORATIVE SHUTTERS L VINYL WINDOW L DECORATIVE L TUBE STEEL RAILING L COLOR SCHEME 1 L- FIBER GLASS L STUCCO REGLET EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. PAINTED BLACK, TYP. FRENCH DOOR 701 n11 RA— U -;-It ME7 r, C Q O C rI All r, LIC 1 11— 1\IJLI\ DECORATIVE SHUTTERS mot! � IPAIRWIN PARTNERS 0� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING Bldg 11 Left Elevation 1 O SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" METAL TRELLIS 1111111IN1111111 VERE 1y11ki1'IILTITIIm�Z�]��1 Y. DECORATIVE EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP OL+22' 3 Roof O no 2 Second Floor F G 1 +011 '--V1'-First Floor 0 Bldg 11 Front Elevation Bldg 11 = 1'-0" V V V V U VVI \ U L L J OBldg 11 Right Elevation 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" 28'-0" Max. Height A.F.G. CONCRETE TILE ROOFING m STUCCO RECESS THH, TO, � EE=Ew .m P -01 TUBE STL. RAILING FIBER GLASS L COLOR SCHEME 2 L STUCCO REGLET PAINTED BLACK, TYP. FRENCH DOOR La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 OL+22' 3 Roof 1 N m +11' O 2 Second Floor +a11 F.G. 1 First Floor 0 Bldg 11 Rear Elevation 1 SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCHEME 1: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW352 ANTIQUE WHITE OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DE6341 VULCAN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. SCHEME 2: STUCCO 1 DUNN EDWARDS DEW380 WHITE, OR EQ. ACCENT 1 DUNN EDWARDS DET606 MEEK MOSS GREEN, OR EQ. FASCIA, TRELLIS, CORBELS DUNN EDWARDS DE6390 CHOCOLATE PUDDING, OR EQ. ROOFING CONCRETE TILE ROOFING MANUF: WESTLAKE ROYAL ROOFING STYLE: BARCELONA COLOR: CASA GRANDE ROOFING TPO ROOFING MANUF: TBD COLOR: TBD VINYL DOORS & WINDOWS COLOR: BRONZE RAILINGS TUBE STEEL, OR SIM. COLOR: BLACK Bldg. 11 -Elevations A18 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 48 moot! o IPAIRWIN PARTNERS m� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING I 9'-0" Ilk TYP. CP CP CP -----------------------------------------------I A - OL+11' 2 Second Floor OL +01, 1 First Floor 0 Pool Equip. Side Elevation 8 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" EXTERIOR LIGHT, TYP. O Pool Equip. Front Elevation 7 SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" ROOF 1/4" PER FOOT SLOPE MINIMUM U g a w a 0 j 61, /I CARPORT BY OTHERS FOR REFEREN" ')N' " Typical Carport Side Elevation 06SCALE:1/4" = 1'-0" CP CP CARPORTS BY OTHERS, _ I FOR REFERENCE ONLY FINAL CARPORT DESIGN TO COMPLY WITH LQMC 9.150.080 La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 0 Typical Carport Plan SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 2 Second Floor 1 1 II JI 1 IVVI 0 Typical Trash Enclosure Side Elevation 4SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" 2 Second Floor I 0 Typical Trash Enclosure Rear Elevation 3SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" mfl*NnE, uuO f�f-Ni 1 MAKI V1\VIII 141VV %L- %a 1 VL11VV 11\/-1V11 VIVIV SIGNAGE SIGNAGE SIGNAGE 2 Second Floor +011 1 First Floor OTypical Trash Enclosure Front Elevation 2SCALE: 1 /4" = 1'-0" Typical Trash Enclosure Plan 0 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0" Exterior Elevations A19 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 49 02 View of Building 3 with Building 4 and putting green in background. 01 View of clubhouse from Washington Street main entry. (B) Bird's-eye view of property. MSI PA IRWIN PARTNERS o� A R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING (03 View of pool area and shade structure 10 . 1 Key Plan 05 0 (07 View of Buildings 4 & 5. 7 �4 a1 1 2 La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 LEGEND X BUILDING NUMBER XX VIEW NUMBER SView of open parking along north property line. t- A 1 —1 Z , 7 , 1- L l l _ j L L _ R 4 jiga r r - M \1 y Sal 15e_ . I (05 View of rear portion of parcel. 1 t III II I II � •. IIIK:: IF _e sem.. 4 �4��. `^ "a (06 View of carports near building 8. 3D Views A20 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 50 LI '-''ry_ 77k...w vi11age i r ++ A yr !i 1 9. u y s 1 d r� S �x n z VY-�,r, t 1 Now - i I LI '-''ry_ 77k...w 4 r� •V r �$ I - PK ra .or �C r M S, v- rt J .w a � q r x Y t •� k 1 I> - ,� S t r e 54, r ---•—.:.;ate �� -- —V K - �\ , d �,i,,r. � xfi� rs IMNAI � ��" Wim` ��,�,.�_ ' ; •�'� { � �,� �. i } a1' e r t 1. Y r 1ii1 V !h4' II d� J 1,lit r s r vi11age i r ++ A yr TreutdalP ��'i Village --ILMI VY-�,r, 4 r� •V r �$ I - PK ra .or �C r M S, v- rt J .w a � q r x Y t •� k 1 I> - ,� S t r e 54, r ---•—.:.;ate �� -- —V K - �\ , d �,i,,r. � xfi� rs IMNAI � ��" Wim` ��,�,.�_ ' ; •�'� { � �,� �. i } a1' e r t 1. Y r 1ii1 V !h4' II d� J 1,lit r s r L�uinta vi11age i A TreutdalP Village Now - L�uinta vi11age A TreutdalP Village rol `•! a .. d .T A i' 1' 1 , L 1.- n y 1 of 1 �1 71 C b f � I to - Zi - 's •'1 r 'r n• \ s ro R fi T _ 1 J ' l - n 17^� i LIa y 5 J e Rrt C' J0". r� t� �r�e aAw� oll y t1 M�s > Pr y � b- y r �777 ji , yom Kai V V d • ��-i � - _-. - /`� ;. ; - 1 Vf1 j •...: --- :,. .-�_ ." .. � . 1, iP \� �tiz � `�t�A. 1�� /�� _ I t1 M�s > Pr y � b- y r �777 ji , yom Kai V V d • ��-i � - _-. - /`� ;. ; - 1 Vf1 j •...: --- :,. .-�_ ." .. � . 1, iP \� �tiz � `�t�A. 1�� /�� _ VIEW FROM WASHINGTON STEET - BUILDINGS 1 & 2 VIEW FROM WASHINGTON STEET - BUILDING 4 & CLUBHOUSE +44'-0"- +40'-0" 440"_+40-0" +36-0" +32-0" _ MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT +28-0" - --- — - — - — - — - — - — - - — - — - — - — - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — ' — +24-0" +20-0" - - — - - — - — - — - — - ---- — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - — - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - +16-0" - - - - - O - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - zo- — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - --- — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — ±12'-0"- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + �0" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- - - - - -+4_0" - ------—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—- — - — - —-------- --- -- --- WASHINGTON STREET — EXISITING SIDEWALK 0 LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET TOWARDS AVENUE 50 3SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" ---—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—- — - — - —--—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-— - — - — -—--—-—-+A4L-0°--e - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — -+goo" — - e -- - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - —- --—-—-—-—-—-—-—-—-— - — - — -—-------+moo"--e -- - --------�VIECHANtCAL-EQb1PMENI` --—-—-—-—-—- — - — - —- - --—-—-—-—-—-—-—-— - — - — -—-- — - — -- - - - - -+32 0" -e -- — ----------------------------- - - - - ----- - ----- --- ---- --------------- -- - - - - - -+28'-0" -� Fo — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - - - - - - — - — - - — - — - — - — - — - - - — - — - — - - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - -+22 - - — - — - — - — - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - — - — - — - — - - - — - — - — - -- — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - + 16'-0" - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - _ - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - CD +12'-0" - _ _ _ - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - — -- 8'-0" - 8'-0_' _ _ - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - — - — - — - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - — - — - - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - - - — - - — - — - — - — -- WASHINGTON STREET BUILDING 4 VIEW FROM AVENUE 50 - BUILDINGS 5 & 6 m�I P1� IRWIN PARTNERS MMA R C H I T E C T S 245 Fischer Avenue, Suite B-2 Costa Mesa CA 92626 (714) 557 2448 www.ipaoc.com ARCHITECTURE PLANNING CONSULTING 19'-0" 31'-0" La Quinta Village Apartments Troutdale Village, LLC. NEC Washington Street & Avenue 50 La Quinta, California 92253 17'-0" RETENTION BASIN SOLID WALL FENCING NEW SIDEWALK ' NEW DECEL LANE 0 LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - WASHINGTON STREET 2SCALE: 1 /8" = 1'-0" +44'-00" - +40'-00" - +36'-00" - +32'-00" - MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - - — - - - - - - +28'-00" - - - - - -� - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — - - - - - - - - - - -- +24'-0" - - - - \ 0. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +2- — - +16'-0 - - - - - - - s` \ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -\ - -I - - - - - - - - - - - - +12'-00" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +8_'-00" - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +4_'-00" AVENUE 50 EXISITING SIDEWALK 45'-3" L LINE OF SIGHT DIAGRAM - AVENUE 50 O SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" Line of Sight Diagrams A22 PROJECT NO: 21014 PLOT DATE: 10/2/2023 21014 La Quinta SD V4 52 _ ,' _ �. \ 1 \ 11 i \ 1 • \ 11 \ 1 \ 11 \ 11 +� -l�•r. _ _ \ 1 \ 1 �I.i -• .��L \ 11 — �1�� 1\ - ,1 n RASH• • I I I I I I I bR4 1 LWf VAI LE1 I •v 1�\ � � ,/t1� �� ® . �r/,�\ � � ♦ � � �,1\ ♦ Ivy - i y 1 i til •I"'AL 1 1, ya JAW " • .1 =� IIS pw • ■ 1 1 \. 1 1 'I I 1 1 1 ; a — k 1 � — 1 — �1 1 • t1 � � � ��% ��%. ;.�::. .= � �� .- ``�'�' 1 11,E •'• _ � r 1 CLUB HOUSE � r i p ��° - • 11/.�" � \�V 111115,' - "��j • _ • .� vAIii 1., rel 1 A FA �. • ,: . �� L- � '.,.,. d�� 1111 • r J .\ .rte `�lrv�, � ��l ^. r = t� I I I � I I 1 I ' I � � \Jlrv.- �i • .. i s i * • ' S I I ISI I / �S 'I �I / 1 ' W W ' t+�u — — — 1063,111 R:�--Vklq POEM] aim PICNIC TABLES POOL RECREATION AREA a I I ♦ I / I / CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN A QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTAI CA PUTTING GREEN AREA - 3,161 POOL AND SPA AREA - 1,434 EST 1 MATED ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE TOTAL - 4,441.2 MAXIMUM ANNUAL APPLIED WATER USE TOTAL - 4,575.14 ESTI MATED LANDSCAPE SQUARE r-7. TOTAL 01 4ol 00, 120' SCALE. P=40' P�l HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 TRASH AGAVE 61SALANA L X>o< "SISAL" 5 GAL. AGAVE ANGUSTIFOLIA "CARIBBEAN AGAVE" AGAVE GEMINIFLORA "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" HESPERALOE PARVIFLOR,4 'DESERT FLAMENCO' 0 ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" SHRUBS CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA "RED BIRD OF PARADISE" LEUCOPHYLLUM PRUINOSUM 'SIERRA BOUQUET' LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS 'WHITE CLOUD' 0 SENNA ARTEMISIOIDES "FEATHERY CASSIA" ® TECOMA STANS "YELLOW BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 'LYNS LEGACY' Q OLEA EUROPAEA 'LITTLE OLLIE' RUSSELIA EQUISETIFORMIS "CORAL BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 'C IMARRON' 4 CARISSA MACROCARPA IBOXWOOD BEAUTY' CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 'LITTLE JOHN' GfRASSES MUHLEN5ERGIA CAPILLARIS 0 777w7= 01 LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA IL 'PLATINUM BEAUTY' ® DIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA' GfROLXDCOVER 4 VINES DALEA GREGGII TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" CARISSA 'GREEN CARPET' EVOLVULUS GLOMERATUS "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" Q BOUGANVILLEA 'LA JOLLA' r--z-� DURANTA REPENS "SKY FLOWER" � �O 000 LOr� (D V � C) O O O O O O O c=`"O BLDG. 3 000 0 BG. 2 0*0 o � o , , 0LDD 0 o� � fL A UJNWc,0 GG G G C0 TYP. BUILDING PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA PLAY EQUIPMENT NOTE PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRCUMFERENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH. LJ,ATE fR CONSE fRVAT I ON STATEMENT LANDSCAPING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1302.1. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. FLANT L�ST SYMBOL QTl'. BOTANICAL NAME :EES $ FALM5 DAL5ERGIA 515500 "INDIAN ROSEWOOD" TIPUANA TIPU "TIPU TREE" OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' ACACIA STENOPHYLLA "SHOESTRING ACACIA" ACACIA SALICINA "WILLOW ACACIA" PARKINSONIA PRAECOX "PALO BREA" ACACIA ANEURA "MULGA" EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA "GHOST GUM" PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA 'ZAHIDI DATE PALM' WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA "MEXICAN FAN PALM" [DESERT ACCENTS 0' lm' 20' 30' SCALE. P=10' SIZE UU,4TE fR USE 24" BOX 0.2 LOW 24" BOX 0.5 MOD 3ro" BOX 0.2 LOUD MULTI -TRK. 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD SINGLE TRK. STND. IV 5TH 0.5 MOD DIAMOND CUT W 5TH 0.5 MOD 15 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 15 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL, 0.2 LOUD 15 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL, 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. AGAVE 61SALANA 5 GAL. "SISAL" 5 GAL. AGAVE ANGUSTIFOLIA "CARIBBEAN AGAVE" AGAVE GEMINIFLORA "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" HESPERALOE PARVIFLOR,4 'DESERT FLAMENCO' 0 ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" SHRUBS CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA "RED BIRD OF PARADISE" LEUCOPHYLLUM PRUINOSUM 'SIERRA BOUQUET' LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS 'WHITE CLOUD' 0 SENNA ARTEMISIOIDES "FEATHERY CASSIA" ® TECOMA STANS "YELLOW BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 'LYNS LEGACY' Q OLEA EUROPAEA 'LITTLE OLLIE' RUSSELIA EQUISETIFORMIS "CORAL BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 'C IMARRON' 4 CARISSA MACROCARPA IBOXWOOD BEAUTY' CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 'LITTLE JOHN' GfRASSES MUHLEN5ERGIA CAPILLARIS 'REGAL MIST' LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'PLATINUM BEAUTY' ® DIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA' GfROLXDCOVER 4 VINES DALEA GREGGII TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" CARISSA 'GREEN CARPET' EVOLVULUS GLOMERATUS "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" Q BOUGANVILLEA 'LA JOLLA' r--z-� DURANTA REPENS "SKY FLOWER" 0' lm' 20' 30' SCALE. P=10' SIZE UU,4TE fR USE 24" BOX 0.2 LOW 24" BOX 0.5 MOD 3ro" BOX 0.2 LOUD MULTI -TRK. 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD SINGLE TRK. STND. IV 5TH 0.5 MOD DIAMOND CUT W 5TH 0.5 MOD 15 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 15 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL, 0.2 LOUD 15 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL, 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. STK. 0.5 MOD LP -2 HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 a4�/I/ COBBLE Z O a 6' HT. BLOCK WALL SIDEWALK oil OP. oc 0 I R. a o O o �o Io R. I . o R. �(D• � I I I -co SII -tea �o 0 II � oC 7 o -co 2 o0 0 P. ■ SLOPE PLANTING EXHIBIT PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA 00 0 ------------ NOTE PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT 5E OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS 5Y VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRCUMFERENCE SHALL 5E FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH. LJ,ATE fR CONSE fRVAT I ON STATEMENT LANDSCAPING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1302.1. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. FLANT L�ST SYMBOL QTl'. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE :EES $ F ALMS DAL5ERGIA 515500 24" BOX "INDIAN ROSEWOOD" TIPUANA TIPU 24" BOX UUATE fR USE 0.2 LOW 0.5 MOD i13 "TIPU TREE" OLEA EUROPAEA 3KJ" BOX 0.2 LOUD S 'SWAN HILL' MULTI -TRK. ACACIA STENOPHYLLA 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD "SHOESTRING ACACIA" SINGLE TRK. STND. ACACIA SALICINA 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD "WILLOW ACACIA" SINGLE TRK. STND. PARKINSONIA PRAECOX 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD "PALO 5REA" SINGLE TRK. STND. ACACIA ANEURA 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD ,i �� MULGAII SINGLE TRK. STND. EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA 24" BOX 0.2 LOUD r � "GHOST GUM" SINGLE TRK. STND. PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA IV 5TH 0.5 MOD 'ZAHIDI DATE PALM' DIAMOND CUT WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA W 5TH 0.5 MOD 'MEXICAN FAN PALM" IDESEF,:'T ACCENTS AGAVE 61SALANA 15 GAL. 0.2 LOUD "SISAL" AGAVE ANGUSTIFOLIA 15 GAL. 0.2 LOUD "CARIBBEAN AGAVE" AGAVE GEMINIFLORA 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" HESPERALOE PARVIFLOR,4 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 'DESERT FLAMENCO' 0 ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII 5 GAL, 0.2 LOUD "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" SHRUBS CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA 15 GAL. 0.2 LOUD "RED BIRD OF PARADISE" LEUCOPHYLLUM PRUINOSUM 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 'SIERRA BOUQUET' LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 'WHITE CLOUD' 0 SENNA ARTEMISIOIDES 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD "FEATHERY CASSIA" ® TECOMA STANS 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD "YELLOW BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 'LYNS LEGACY' © OLEA EUROPAEA 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD 'LITTLE OLLIE' RUSSELIA EQUISETIFORMIS 5 GAL, 0.5 MOD "CORAL BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 5 GAL, 0.2 LOUD 'C IMARRON' 4 CARISSA MACROCARPA 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD BOXWOOD BEAUTY' CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 'LITTLE JOHN' GfRASSES MUHLEN5ERGIA CAPILLARIS 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 'REGAL MIST' LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 'PLATINUM BEAUTY' ® DIANELLA TASMANICA 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 'VARIEGATA' GfROLXDCOVER 4 VINES DALEA GREGGII 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" CARISSA 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 'GREEN CARPET' EVOLVULUS GLOMERATUS 5 GAL. 0.2 LOUD "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" • 5OUGANVILLEA 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 'LA JOLLA' r--� DURANTA REPENS 5 GAL. STK. 0.5 MOD "SKY FLOWER" 01 101 20' 30, SCALE. P=10' LP -3 HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 a5�/I/ --- POOL AREA PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA FLANT L�ST SYMBOL QTl'. BOTANICAL NAME SIZE UJATER USE :EES 8 PALMS DAL5ERGIA 515500 24" BOX 0.2 LOW "INDIAN ROSEWOOD" TIPUANA TIPU 24" BOX 0.5 MOD "TIPU TREE" OLEA EUROPAEA 'SWAN HILL' ACACIA STENOPHYLLA "SHOESTRING ACACIA" ACACIA SALICINA "WILLOW ACACIA" PARKINSONIA PRAECOX "PALO BREA" ACACIA ANEURA "MULGA" EUCALYPTUS PAPUANA "GHOST GUM" PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA 'ZAHIDI DATE PALM' WASHINGTONIA ROBUSTA "MEXICAN FAN PALM" [DESERT ACCENTS AGAVE 61SALANA "SISAL" AGAVE ANGUSTIFOLIA "CARIBBEAN AGAVE" AGAVE GEMINIFLORA "TWIN -FLOWERING AGAVE" HESPERALOE PARVIFLOR,4 'DESERT FLAMENCO' 0 ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII "GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS" SHRUBS CAESALPINIA PULCHERRIMA "RED BIRD OF PARADISE" LEUCOPHYLLUM PRUINOSUM 'SIERRA BOUQUET' LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS 'WHITE CLOUD' SENNA ARTEMISIOIDES "FEATHERY CASSIA" ® TECOMA STANS "YELLOW BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM LANGMANIAE 'LYNS LEGACY' © OLEA EUROPAEA 'LITTLE OLLIE' RUSSELIA EQUISETIFORMIS "CORAL BELLS" LEUCOPHYLLUM ZYGOPHYLLUM 'C IMARRON' 4 CARISSA MACROCARPA 'BOXWOOD BEAUTY' CALLISTEMON VIMINALIS 'LITTLE JOHN' GfRASSES MUHLEN5ERGIA CAPILLARIS 'REGAL MIST' LOMANDRA LONGIFOLIA 'PLATINUM BEAUTY' 0 DIANELLA TASMANICA 'VARIEGATA' GfROL NIDCOVER 4 VINES DALEA GREGGII TRAILING INDIGO BUSH" CARISSA WITH 'GREEN CARPET' EVOLVULUS GLOMERATUS "HAWAIIAN BLUE EYES" Q BOUGANVILLEA 'LA JOLLA' hvvc�v �r►vnvu r--z-� DURANTA REPENS NOTE: "SKY FLOWER" PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE CIRCUMFERENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH. LJ,ATE fR CONSE VAT I ON STATEMENT LANDSCAPING IS CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1302.1. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. 0' lm' 20' 30' SCALE. P=10' 361, BOX 0.2 LOW MULTI -TRK. 24" BOX 0.2 LOW SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOW SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOW SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOW SINGLE TRK. STND. 24" BOX 0.2 LOW SINGLE TRK. STND. IV 5TH 0.5 MOD DIAMOND CUT W 5TH 0.5 MOD 15 GAL. 0.2 LOW 15 GAL. 0.2 LOW 5 GAL. 0.2 LOW 5 GAL. 0.2 LOW 5 GAL, 0.2 LOW 15 GAL. 0.2 LOW 5 GAL. 0.2 LOW 5 GAL. 0.2 LOW 5 GAL. 0.2 LOW 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOW 5 GAL. 0.2 LOW 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL, 0.2 LOW 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOW 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. 0.2 LOW 5 GAL. 0.5 MOD 5 GAL. STK. 0.5 MOD LP -4 HERMANN DESIGN V ROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 Lu Lu co z O C, z Q 6' HT. BLOCK 1 „ „o „„�M 11/A-Ek\IEmammNovi-Oki WpimIw NOTA : PIV, FDC, HYDRANT LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE OBSTRUCTED FROM ACCESS BY VEGETATION. A MINIMUM 3 -FEET RADIUS AROUND EACH DEVICE NTRY CIRCUMFERENCE SHALL BE FREE OF OBSTRUCTIVE VEGETATION, WITH CONSIDERATION OF MATURE PLANT GROWTH. P�5 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA W ATEF CON5ERV AT I ON 3T,ATEI IENT LANDSCAPING IS CONSISTENT UJITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY LATER DISTRICT ORDINANCE 1302.1. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE DESIGNED FOR EFFICIENT PERFORMANCE WITH CONSERVATION IN MIND. POINT SOURCE DRIP / BUBBLER SYSTEMS WILL PROVIDE DIRECT WATER TO THE SHRUBS AND TREES. SCALE. P=10' HERMANN DESIGN GROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 flA7rj7e,/5/25 MONU SIGN — cn SD SD - • LAWN � • i� �� LAWN BLDG 12 / LEGENED / EXISTING BLOCK WALL TO REMAIN IN PLACE 6' HT. BLOGK WALL WITH STUCCO FINISH MATCH ARCHITECTURE r /�o' HT. SPLITFACE TAN COLOR BLOCK WALL WITH FLAT GAP TAN GOLOR HT. PILASTER WITH STUCCO FINISH WITH DECORATIVE TAN COLOR CAP E E SID 'DECORATIVE CAP MONUMENT SIGN STUCCO FINISH TO MATCH ARCHITECTURE TAN COLOR HT. SIGN LETTERING CONCEPTUAL WALL DF N CE PLAN LP -6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE PLAN LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS PARKER DEVELOPMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA, CA SCALE. P=40' HERMANN DESIGN GROUP 77-899 WOLF RD. SUITE 102 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 LIC# 2754, EXP 04/30/22 PH. (760) 777-9131 FAX (760) 777-9132 flA7rj8e,/5/25 ATTACHMENT 3 La Quinta Village Specific Plan La Paloma Specific Plan Amendment Amendment No. 2 City of La Quinta Adopted xx,xx, 2023 Resolution Number xxxx Prepared For: Troutdale Village, LLC. 1800 Blankenship Road #325 Linn, Oregon 97068 Prepared BY: Altum Group Rich Malacoff, AICP Heather Boland Jordan Parrish 44600 Village Court, Suite 100 Palm Desert, California 92260 59 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Table of Contents Section 1 Introduction/Purpose.............................................................................................. 5 ExecutiveSummary.............................................................................................................. 6 TheProcess............................................................................................................................ 6 Relationship to Other Agencies........................................................................................... 7 Relationship to the General Plan......................................................................................... 7 Section2 Specific Plan.......................................................................................................... 10 ProjectDescription...............................................................................................................10 ArtIn Public Places..............................................................................................................1 1 Infrastructure Phasing..........................................................................................................1 1 Grading / Drainage / Flood Control..................................................................................1 1 ErosionControl....................................................................................................1 1 SWPPP / NPDES / PM 10........................................................................................12 Hydrology.......................................................................................................... 12 Flood Control Master Plan....................................................................................12 On -Site Storm Water Design / PWQMP..............................................................................12 NuisanceWater.................................................................................................. 13 Utilities...............................................................................................................13 SewerPlan......................................................................................................... 13 WaterPlan............................................................................................................................13 CVWDWell Site...................................................................................................13 ElectricalPlan.......................................................................................................................13 OtherUtilities.........................................................................................................................13 Section3 Land Use Plan........................................................................................................ 15 LandUse...............................................................................................................................15 DevelopmentStandards.....................................................................................................15 Additional Development Standards..................................................................................17 Specific Plan Minor Modifications......................................................................................18 Specific Plan Amendments...................................................................................18 Modifications to Approved Grading Plan................................................................19 ParkingRequirements..........................................................................................................19 Carportsand Garages........................................................................................................19 m La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 TrashEnclosures...................................................................................................20 Fencingand Walls...............................................................................................................20 Lighting.................................................................................................................................22 Section 4 Circulation Overview.............................................................................................24 Off -Site Circulation System..................................................................................................23 On -Site Circulation System..................................................................................................23 PublicTransportation...........................................................................................................23 Section 5 Design Guidelines..................................................................................................24 LandscapeConcepts...........................................................................................25 ApprovalProcess.................................................................................................26 Development Standards.......................................................................................27 Signage.................................................................................................................................27 General Architectural Theme.............................................................................................27 AdministrativePlan.............................................................................................. 35 Implementation Program..................................................................................... 35 Site Development Permit...................................................................................... 36 List of Exhibits Exhibit 1 Regional Location Map Exhibit 2 Project Vicinity Map Exhibit 3 USGS Map Exhibit 4 Site Plan Exhibit 5 City Zoning Map Exhibit 6 City General Plan Map Exhibit 7 Image Corridor Exhibit Exhibit 8 Photo Array Exhibit 9 FEMA Map Exhibit 10 Civil Site Plan Exhibit 11 Conceptual Grading Plan Exhibit 12 Preliminary Utility Plan Exhibit 13 First Floor Plan 61 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Exhibit 14 Second Floor Plan Exhibit 15 Third Floor Plan Exhibit 16 Roof Plan Exhibit 17 Unit Plans Exhibit 18 Clubhouse Exhibit 19 Bldg. 1 - Elevations Exhibit 20 Bldg. 2 - Elevations Exhibit 21 Bldg. 3 - Elevations Exhibit 22 Bldg. 3 - Elevations Exhibit 23 Bldg. 4 - Elevations Exhibit 24 Bldg. 5 - Elevations Exhibit 25 Bldg. 6 - Elevations Exhibit 26 Bldg. 7 - Elevations Exhibit 27 Bldg. 8 - Elevations Exhibit 28 Bldg. 9 - Elevations Exhibit 29 Bldg. 10 -Elevations Exhibit 30 Bldg. 11 Elevations Exhibit 31 Exterior Elevations Exhibit 32 3D Views Exhibit 33 3D Views & Materials Board Exhibit 34 Line of Sight Diagram Exhibit 35.1 Site Lighting Plan Exhibit 35.2 Site Lighting Plan Exhibit 36.1 Site Photometric Plan Exhibit 36.2 Site Photometric Plan Exhibit 37 Light Fixture Cut Sheets Exhibit 38 Conceptual Landscape Plan Exhibit 39 Typical Building Planting Exhibit Exhibit 40 Slope Planting Exhibit Exhibit 41 Pool Area Exhibit 42 Entry Exhibit 43 Wall & Fence Plan RY, La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 This page intentionally left blank. IV 63 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 1 - Introduction/Purpose The purpose of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan, previously known as the La Paloma Specific Plan, is to set forth the detailed development principles, guidelines, and programs to facilitate the development of a 14.03 -acre site located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. (Exhibit 2 - Vicinity Map). The project is designed and will be managed as a multi -family apartment project. The community will consist of one- and two-bedroom units with a mix of market -rate and moderate -income units. This Specific Plan proposes development standards for the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 (APN: 646-070-016). This Specific Plan Amendment will replace previous Specific Plans and substitute for the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). Any issue not addressed in the Specific Plan will defer to the La Quinta Municipal Code. For the sake of clarity, the parcel on the southeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 is not part of this Specific Plan similarly as it was in the amended 2011 version of the La Paloma Specific Plan. The 2011 La Paloma Specific Plan removed this parcel from the designated specific plan area and reverted it back to the underlying standards for Residential Medium (RM) zoning. This parcel was previously included within the 2004 Pacific Retirement Services and Westport La Quinta LP (Specific Plan 2004-071). This Specific Plan is intended to meet the requirements for a Specific Plan as set forth in State law and City of La Quinta regulations. The State authorizes cities and counties to adopt Specific Plans, as appropriate, in implementing their General Plans. Such a plan is to include the detailed regulations, conditions, programs, and any proposed legislation that is necessary for the systematic implementation of the General Plan. The Specific Plan provides the linkage between the General Plan (and the general goals and policies of the City) and the detailed implementation of that plan with tools such as zoning ordinances, subdivision ordinances, and the like. The Government Code (Section 65451) sets forth the minimum requirements of a Specific Plan and states: "A Specific Plan shall include a text and diagram or diagrams which specify all of the following in detail: 1. The distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land, including open space, within the area covered by the plan. 2. The proposed distribution, location, and extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan and needed to support the land uses described by the plan. 3. Standards and criteria by which development will proceed, and standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources, where applicable. 4. A program of implementation measures including regulations, programs, public works projects, and financing measures necessary to carry out paragraphs (1), (2), and (3)." The establishment of specific performance, design, and development standards is set forth to guide the development of the subject property in such a way as to implement 5 64 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 the General Plan while maintaining some flexibility to respond to changing conditions which may be a factor in any long-term development program. The document also acts to augment the City's Zoning Ordinance by providing design guidelines, a tailored list of permitted and prohibited uses for the site, and unique development standards. The site plan, architectural, and landscape illustrations in the Specific Plan establish a design theme with detailed perspectives. These illustrations are conceptual and do not constitute precise pre -construction drawings. Executive Summary La Quinta Village Apartments is a proposed multi -family apartment project located on 14.03 acres on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta (Exhibit 2 - Project Vicinity Map). The General Plan designation of the site is Medium High Density Residential (Exhibit 6 - General Plan Map). The zoning designation is Medium High Density Residential (RMH) (Exhibit 5 - City Zoning Map). The project site fronts Washington Street which is designated by the City's General Plan as a major arterial and abuts Avenue 50 designated as a primary arterial. The site is vacant, generally flat, and has been grubbed and leveled in the past. The site was previously entitled for single-family subdivision in the early 1990's but the entitlements have since expired. Property to the immediate east is the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) evacuation channel. Further east on the far side of the channel is a Sports Complex, the La Quinta Middle School, and single-family residences. Surrounding property to the north is subdivided and mostly developed with single family residences. Directly west across Washington Street is the La Quinta County Club. Property to the south is vacant and zoned for Medium Density Residential. Site photos are illustrated on Exhibit 8 - Photo Array. The project will operate as a multiple -family residential apartments with a mix of moderate -income units (74 Units) and market -rate Units (178 Units). The project will incorporate amenities such as a clubhouse, pool and spa, barbeque areas, pickle ball court, tot lot and dog park. (Exhibit 4 - Site Plan). Additionally, the project site will be environmentally responsible and will take steps both during and after construction to ensure minimal impact to the surrounding neighborhood and a positive long-term impact on those who will reside and work at La Quinta Village Apartments. The Environmental Conservation Element of the General Plan identifies the site as having no significant issues constraining the property. The Process The purpose of a Specific Plan is to provide a detailed plan for a selected area within the City for the purpose of implementing the General Plan. The Specific Plan outlines and directs all facets of development for the site. The standards of development delineated in this Specific Plan create a link between the General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. Implementation of the Specific Plan is intended to carry out the goals and policies contained in the La Quinta General Plan. 6 65 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The project will require approvals from the Planning Commission and City Council for the Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Site Development Permit, Density Bonus Agreement, and the Implementation of Assembly Bill 330. In addition, the City will review the engineering and building construction documents which must also be consistent with the Specific Plan and Site Development Permit approvals. The project and the various applications that are necessary to complete the entitlement process shall be consistent with the City ordinances, policies, and regulations of the City of La Quinta unless otherwise approved within this Specific Plan. Relationship to Other Agencies In addition to the City's approvals and actions, permits will be needed from the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for connection to water and sewer lines. Other infrastructure extensions or connections will be required by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) for electrical power, Frontier for telephone service, Southern California Gas Company for natural gas, and Spectrum for cable TV service. The Coachella Valley Water District controls a portion of the sloped area adjacent to Avenue 50. They control any drainage into the channel and any alterations or landscape of its property. Relationship to the General Plan All development within the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall be consistent with the provisions of the La Quinta General Plan. The proposed General Plan Land Use for the site is shown in Exhibit 6. Among the important provisions of the General Plan that will be implemented upon the development of La Quinta Village Specific Plan include: • Land Use - Medium High Density Residential uses should be located close to park/open space uses such as neighborhood and community parks (such as Saguaro Park), schools (including John Adams Elementary Schools and La Quinta Middle School STEM Academy), or other recreational facilities. • Land Use - Medium High Density Residential Uses can be used to provide transition areas between low density residential uses and high-density commercial uses along arterial roadways. • Circulation - The Circulation Element of the General Plan outlines the design and location of required street improvements to complete the transportation system in the City. La Quinta Village Apartments will complete the unfinished portions of two important links in the City's circulation network: Washington Street and Avenue 50. Potential improvements may include sidewalks, bicycle lanes, bus stops, and signal improvements. • Primary Image Corridors - In addition to roadway improvements, the Project will refine the Image Corridors. Washington Street is identified as a Primary Image Corridor and Avenue 50 is shown as a Secondary Image Corridor. The Specific Plan will modify the height requirements but will maintain the striking 7 66 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 viewsheds that define the City of La Quinta. The 150 -foot setback on Washington Street and Avenue 50 are shown on Exhibit 7 - Image Corridor Exhibit. • Water Quantity and Quality -The Specific Plan outlines the use of drought tolerant planting, irrigation techniques, and incorporates a grading concept designed to detain stormwater on-site. • Infrastructure - The Specific Plan incorporates plans to complete the infrastructure that lies adjacent to the project site. The La Quinta Village Specific Plan seeks to establish a well-defined planning framework that implements the goals, policies, and objectives of the City's 2035 General Plan. As a comprehensive development plan, it ensures a cohesive, integrated framework for the development of multiple family housing. This chapter provides a summary discussion to demonstrate that the La Quinta Village Specific Plan is consistent with the City's General Plan and that the La Quinta Village Specific Plan results in the implementation of applicable goals and policies included in the City's General Plan. Table 1 - General Plan Consistency Analysis General Plan Goal or Policy Consistency Finding Land Use Goal LU -2: High quality design that The La Quinta Village community complements and enhances the city. incorporates high quality desert architectural themes and materials into the building aesthetic. Policy LU -2.4: Planning for all major The proposed residential buildings have been community facilities shall carefully consider broken up and set back from the northern the potential impacts to adjacent property line to reduce the impact of its mass development, particularly residential on the adjoining single-family neighborhood. development. Program LU -2.7a: Continue to utilize the This development will pay the required QUIMBY Act to charge park fees and allow QUIMBY Act fees. for park development. Goal LU -5: A broad range of housing types Providing both market -rate and moderate - and choices for all residents of the city. income rentals fills the need for this type of housing, which is not being satisfied currently. In addition, the variation in apartment size, accessibility, and affordability provides opportunities for a great variety of residents in La Quinta. Housing Policy H-2.1: Increase housing choices for This development will provide 74 affordable lower and moderate -income households. units and 178 market -rate income units which provides more housing options in the City of La Quinta. 8 67 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 General Plan Goal or Policy I Consistency Finding Policy H-6.1: Promote higher density and compact developments that increase energy efficiency and reduce land consumption. Goal H-5: Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons. Policy 5.5: Improve quality of life for disabled persons by facilitating relief from regulatory requirements that may require barriers to accessible housing and promoting universal design. La Quinta Village Apartments provides 18 dwelling units per acre while minimizing its impact on the nearby single-family neiahborhoods. La Quinta Village Apartments will provide affordable moderate -income units and accessible units, providing a greater variety of housing types in the City of La Quinta. La Quinta Village Apartments will provide ground floor accessible units. The pool, spa, parking, and other recreational spaces will be compliant with accessibility regulations. Circulation Program CIR 1.10a: Review new and redeveloping projects along all major roadways with the intent of limiting access and aligning and/or consolidating access drives in a manner which minimizes the use of existing and planned signalized intersections. Policy CIR 1.12: As a means of reducing vehicular traffic on major roadways and to reduce vehicle miles travels by traffic originating in the city, the city shall pursue development of a land use pattern that maximizes the interactions between adjacent or nearby land uses. Policy CIR 1.17: To preserve the aesthetic values on the city's streets, optimum landscape setback shall be maintained along all designated General Plan Image Corridors and shall be identified in the City's Municipal Code. Access will be provided along a primary and major arterial road. The access points have been designed to minimize interruptions at the intersection of Washington Street and Avenue 50. Due to the community's proximity to the school, children will be able to walk safely to school. Additionally, La Quinta Village Apartments is near a Sunline route, which will allow its residents to have easy access to public transit services. Both Washington Street and Avenue 50 are image corridors and have a 150 -foot setback with a 22 -foot height restriction which will be raised to 28 feet to accommodate Spanish the roofing. The viewshed will still provide beautiful panoramic views of the Santa Rosa Mountains. Natural Resources Policy OS 2.3: Encourage the preservation of open space in privately owned development projects. Goal SC -1: A community that provides the best possible quality of life for its residents. La Quinta Village Apartments provides 4.5 to 5 acres of open space areas for its residents, above the minimum required per the city's municipal code. The community will have intricate pedestrian pathways for its residents that provide connectivity throughout the site. La Quinta Village Apartments will provide open space and recreational amenities such as a clubhouse, pool and spa, barbeque areas, putting course, fitness center, and office space. .: La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 2 - Specific Plan Project Description The project site consists of a 14.03 -acre parcel located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in the City of La Quinta. The site is currently vacant but has been cleared and grubbed. It was previously approved for the development of a single-family tract of houses (Tentative Tract Map 26148) in the late 1980's and the approval was extended into the early 1990's. However, the entitlements were allowed to lapse. To the north, the project site abuts a mostly built out established tract of single- family homes which are accessed from Washington Street at Sagebrush Avenue. La Quinta Village Apartments is a proposed multiple family residential development that will offer 252 -units of which 178 will be market -rate and 74 will be moderate income affordable units. The housing type will be a mix of one- and two-bedroom units with a total of 132 one -bedroom units and 120 two-bedroom units. The project will have two- story apartment buildings with a maximum height of 28 feet with a Spanish hacienda architectural design aesthetic. The proposed density is 18 dwelling units per acre, which includes the use of a Density Bonus for Affordable Housing from LQMC Section 9.60.260. In contrast to the City of La Quinta's Zoning Ordinance, this Specific Plan will allow for the moderate -income affordable housing density bonus to be applied without requiring the affordable units to be offered to the public for purchase. The density permitted in the Medium High Density Residential zoning allows for 8 to 12 units per acre. The project amenities will include a dog park, pickle ball court, putting green, swimming pool and spa, barbeque areas, tot lot, and clubhouse. Inside the clubhouse there will be offices, restrooms, showers, a fitness center, and a community area. This apartment community will be managed by a management company that will develop and enforce all community standards and rules. La Quinta Village will be an environmentally sustainable community that will help facilitate and encourage health and wellness for its residents and employees. The project will create community connectivity through access to public transportation. Recycling within the project using collection bins will also be encouraged. Water and energy efficiency will be implemented throughout the project by using high -efficiency, low -flow rate plumbing fixtures and Energy Star rated appliances. Architectural features such as colors, materials, and shading devices will also reduce the project's energy demands. Landscaping will meet or exceed CVWD water budget requirements. Parking for the facility is primarily located directly off the perimeter drive along both Avenue 50 and Washington Street. The perimeter drive is proposed to provide fire and safety equipment access and servicing to the complex. The site plan complies with required landscape setbacks on both Washington Street and Avenue 50 and employs a single vehicular access from each street to the site. These standards are consistent with the adopted image corridors regulations established in the General Plan. The site is irregular in shape and the development is constrained by parcel geometry, additional street dedication on Washington to comply with the General Plan, and the city staff request for additional right-of-way to accommodate a dedicated right turn lane. The project proponent previously dedicated full General Plan Right -of- Way for both streets. 10 69 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The project is within the image corridor of both Washington Street and Avenue 50. The image corridor setback is measured 150 feet from the right-of-way line as defined in the parcel map. Portions of buildings fronting on Washington Street and Avenue 50 are within the 150 -foot setback. A detailed discussion of the Image Corridors is included later in the Specific Plan. There is a 75 -foot building setback from Coachella Valley Water District Stormwater Channel located to the east of the project site. No buildings are allowed within the 75 - foot setback; however, carports are permitted. Art In Public Places The requirement for art in public places will be satisfied in accordance with Section 2.65 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Infrastructure Phasing The infrastructure improvements required in conjunction with this development will be installed and completed prior to occupancy of the facility. All adjacent infrastructure improvements adjacent to the site will be improved with the initial development of the property. Grading / Drainage / Flood Contro The site will be mass graded and it is anticipated that there will be a net -import of material to the site. Overall, it is anticipated that approximately 36,000 cubic yards of import will be moved to the site. Stormwater, including that from a 100 -year event, will be stored in above ground retention facilities. As an alternative, a regional assessment could be undertaken to determine the feasibility of discharging flows into the channel after first flush. To do this, the City and CVWD would have to see an analysis that shows there is adequate capacity in the channel when the subject property discharges storm flows. Due to the adjacent Evacuation Channel, CVWD has noted that the channel water surface elevation is established at 48 feet above sea level. The City Engineer will require that the site development plan and street improvement plans for Avenue 50 are designed and constructed to provide a minimum elevation of 50 feet to prevent flooding. The Conceptual Grading Plan is shown in Exhibit 11. Erosion Control The grading operations shall include adequate provisions for wind and water erosion control both during as well as after grading operations have ceased. The details of erosion control shall be included in the project's Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) and PM 10 Plan. • Pre -watering - The site shall be pre -watered to a depth of three feet prior to the onset of grading operations. • During Grading - Once grading has commenced, and until grading has been completed, watering of the site and/or other treatment(s) determined to be appropriate shall be ongoing. 70 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 • Post Grading - All disturbed areas shall be treated to prevent erosion for the term that the area will remain undeveloped. Final landscape and irrigation shall be installed as soon as feasible after grading operations have been completed. SWPPP/NPDES/PM 10 Since the Coachella Valley experiences periods of moderate to heavy wind conditions, wind-blown dust and sand is a concern with mass grading operations, especially those more than five acres in size. Because of health concerns, the Environmental Protection Agency has instituted a plan in the valley to curb excess small particle dust (PM 10). The City also participates in the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System program. The City of La Quinta requires SWPPP, NPDES and PM 10 plans to control the wind- and water - born erosion associated with such grading operations. The project will comply with the City's requirements relative to these programs. Hydrology La Quinta Village lies in a Zone X Other Areas flood zone as determined by FEMA, Community Panel Number 06065C-2241 G, revised August 20, 2008. Zone X includes areas to be outside the 500 -year event. There are no tributary flows that must be accommodated in the development of the site (Exhibit 8 - Photo Array). Flood Control Master Plan The stormwater drainage system in the City of La Quinta is administered by CVWD. The system consists of improvements to the natural drainage channels that run through the city. There is an existing storm drain located in Washington Street that collects storm water and conducts that flow into the adjacent Evacuation Channel via a storm drain in Avenue 50. Water collected in this channel then feeds into the Whitewater River and to the Salton Sea. On -Site Storm Water Design / PWQMP The City of La Quinta in conjunction with CVWD requires each development to include provisions for handling storm water attributed to the site. The design storm, which creates the worst-case scenario is a 100 -year, 3 -hour event. Each development project must either retain the 100 -year stormwater on site or discharge it into an approved storm water system after first flush containments have been removed. The initial storm water design concept for the La Quinta Village Apartments is to retain the storm water on-site in above -ground basins. A Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) will be submitted as part of the Site Development Permit, showing how the first flush containments will be collected and removed from the storm water prior to percolation or dewatering. Nuisance Water Nuisance water attributed to the project will be collected and directed to the above- ground retention basin areas if this is the final method chosen for handling stormwater. If a direct discharge approach is proven feasible, nuisance water will be directed to one 12 71 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 or more dry wells if needed. The amount of nuisance water is expected to be reduced due to the use of water efficient landscape and irrigation materials. Utilities La Quinta Village Apartments is well served by utilities and is situated in a corridor planned for a relatively intense scope of urban development. Utility extensions will be minimal with most utilities existing at the perimeter of the site. Some upgrades will be required by the individual utility companies providing service to the property. Several overhead utility lines exist along Washington Street, Avenue 50, and along the Evacuation Channel. It is the intent of the development to underground all the adjacent overhead utility lines except for the transmission lines along the northern property line and the transmission lines following the alignment of the channel, as required by the City of La Quinta, and regulated by the Imperial Irrigation District (Exhibit 12 - Preliminary Utility Plan). Street improvements implementing the project's conditions of approval will be installed concurrently with the construction of the project and will be completed prior to occupancy of the facility. Sewer Plan Sanitary sewer facilities for La Quinta are provided by CVWD. Sewer mains are located on the west side of the site in Washington Street, in Avenue 50, and in the Evacuation Channel at the southeast corner of the site. Sewage will flow by gravity to the main. No upsizing of facilities will be required. The on-site sewer system will be private (Exhibit 12 - Preliminary Utility Plan). Water Plan Water facilities for La Quinta are provided by CVWD. An 18 -inch main exists in Washington Street and there is also an 18 -inch main in Avenue 50. The on-site water lines will be connected into the existing infrastructure network in at least two places to avoid "dead- end" lines. CVWD Well Site No well site is required for the property. The nearest well is located outside the site near the northeast corner of the project. Electrical Plan The Imperial Irrigation District (IID) provides electric facilities in the City of La Quinta. IID indicates that the design of the electrical service will depend on final load calculations for the overall project. IID will require the installation of underground facilities throughout the project. Existing power poles located on Washington Street and Avenue 50 may be undergrounded if practical and allowed by IID. Other Utilities 13 72 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Natural gas is provided by the Southern California Gas Company. The nearest facility is a 6 -inch line located in Washington Street. The project site will independently connect into the gas line. Television cable service is provided by Spectrum Cable with the nearest facilities located in Washington Street at Saguaro Drive abutting the site. Landline Telephone service will be provided by Frontier Communications. Facilities exist in both Washington Street and Avenue 50. Frontier expects to serve the project from these locations. Waste disposal service is provided by Burrtec Waste Industries. The project also proposes implementing recycling facilities within the project using collection bins and instructing occupants and employees to use. Waste and recycling materials will be deposited by residents at various locations throughout the site. Burrtec will collect the refuse and recyclables. 14 73 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 3 - Land Use Plan Land Use The land use designation for the site is Medium High Density Residential (RMH). This designation allows multi -family housing. Development Standards The development standards outlined in this document are specific to this development and may differ from the La Quinta Municipal Code. The uses and development standards will be in accordance with the provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code and General Plan regulations. Should conflict occur between the regulations and the Specific Plan, the provisions of the Specific Plan and supporting text shall prevail. Any matter not addressed in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall defer to the La Quinta Municipal Code. Residential Permitted Uses Apartments/condominium for multi -family housing. Including the following: garages, carports, patio covers, decks, gazebos, outdoor terraces, fences and walls, clubhouses, swimming pools and spas, cabanas, barbeque, passive and active recreations such as picnic tables, pickleball and tennis courts, community gardens. Guesthouses, Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), Junior Dwelling Units subject to LQMC 9.60.090 or applicable change in State Law. Congregate Care Facilities are only permitted subject to the rules and regulations of the State of California. Home Occupation Permits subject to LQMC 0.210.060 Child Day Care or Family Day Care Facilities as an accessory use, serving 6 or fewer children, subject to LQMC 9.60.190. Licensed Service Animals or in -training are exempt. Utility Facilities such as water, sewer, cable, electricity, and gas are permitted uses. Telecommunication facilities will be allowed subject to LQMC 9.170 Residential Prohibited Uses Kennels and Catteries Keeping of barnyard, wild, exotic, reptiles, and dangerous animals. Agriculture Uses except for community gardens Storage, parking, maintenance of recreation vehicles or mobile homes. Maintenance of autos and trucks. Single Family Residential Dwellings as a Primary Use 15 74 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Residential Development Standards Minimum Project Size for Multi -Family Projects 20,000 SQ. FT. Minimum Frontage for Multi -Family Projects 100 Feet Maximum Structure Height 3 28 Feet Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor 3, a 28 Feet Maximum Number of Stories 2 Minimum Front Yard Setback 20 Feet Minimum Interior/Exterior Side Yard Setback 1, 2,7 5/10 Feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 15 Feet Minimum Garage Setback 5 Feet Maximum Lot Coverage 60% Minimum Common Open Area 5 30% Minimum/Average Perimeter Landscape Setback 10/20 Feet Minimum Livable Area 6 670 SQ. FT. General Notes: 1 Parking and carports are permitted within front, interior/exterior side, and rear setbacks. 2 To avoid monotony on the street side -yard, buildings can extend into the setback area if the average of 20 feet is maintained. 3 Only residential and commercial structures are included in the height restrictions. Potential utilities facilities such as water, sewer, cable, electricity, phone, cell, and gas are not included. 4 The maximum structure height equals 28 feet for all buildings within 150 -feet of any general plan -designated image corridor. Height restriction shall not include roof -mounted equipment screening and parapet walls. 5 Common open area equals percent of net project area. Perimeter landscape setback are adjacent to perimeter streets: first number equals minimum at any point; second number equals minimum average over entire frontage. 6 Excludes garage and private open space. 7 For interior side yards, if the building is over 17 feet in height, the setback is 5 feet plus 1 foot for every foot over 17 feet in height or fraction thereof, to a maximum of 10 feet. The additional setback may be provided entirely at grade level or a combination of at grade and airspace above the 17 -foot building. Density Calculations: The density used for the calculation refers to Medium High Density Residential standards and Density Bonus allowances for moderate -income affordable units respectively, LQMC Section 9.30.070 and Section 9.60.260 (G) (4). Calculation: RMH Density Allowed = 12 du/ac Acres = 14.03 12 du/ac x 14.03 acres = 168 Total Allowable Units (Base) Percentage of Density Bonus = 50% New Density = 18 du/ac 18 du/ac x 14.03 acres = 252 Maximum Allowable Units with Density Bonus 16 75 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Percentage of Moderate -Income Units = 440 44% moderate -income percentage x 168 base units = 74 Minimum Required Moderate -Income Units Breakdown of Units: Market Rate Units 178 Affordable Units 74 Total Number of Units = 252 The calculations for the gross area shall include all dedicated lands for right-of-way, drainage, retention basins, and utilities. This gross area shall be used to calculate the gross density for the property. Note: The Specific Plan will allow the use of the Density Bonus for rental units in addition to home ownership, which is currently allowed per the La Quinta Municipal Code regardless of affordable income level. Additional Development Standards General Requirements: A. Architectural projections such as roof overhangs, chimneys, awnings, and canopies may encroach a maximum of two feet into any required setback provided such projections are no closer than three- and one-half feet from any property line. B. Roof structures not associated with living area such as parapet walls, air conditioners, chimneys, and other such structures shall not be included in the measurement of height. Only parts of the building that are directly related to living area shall be part of the height calculation. Height shall be measure from finished grade. C. Masonry walls and/or decorative fencing a maximum of six feet in height shall be used along the perimeter of the property and along public streets within perimeter landscaping setbacks. Ornamental iron and tubular steel fencing is permitted to be used in any location on the lot. D. Parking shall be screened from public views on the street frontage by use of walls, fences, landscaping, or decorative berms. E. Roof mounted utility and mechanical equipment including, but not limited to, air conditioning and heating shall be screened and an integral part of the roof design. Screening parapets will be a maximum of five feet. Ground mounted utility and mechanical equipment may be located within setback areas and shall be screened with, but not limited to, landscape planting, walls, and fencing. F. Architecturally integrated parapets to screen roof equipment shall not be included in the building height. G. For multi -family residential, the minimum livable area shall be 670 square feet. 17 76 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 H. Parking, carports, pickleball court, and dog park are permitted to be located within setbacks. Specific Plan Minor Modifications The following constitute minor modifications to the Specific Plan not requiring a Specific Plan Amendment and are subject to review and approval by the Design and Development Director. The Design and Development Director shall have the discretion to refer any such requests for modification to the Specific Plan development standards using the criteria found in the La Quinta Municipal Code Sections 9.200.90 or 9.200.110: • Change in utility provider. • A maximum shift of ten percent (10%) of the total number of various unit types provided the total number of units or density for the entire Specific Plan area does not exceed that established in the Specific Plan Amendment. • Minor changes to development standards can be approved by the Development Services Manager or their designee subject to LQMC Section 9.210.040. • Minor changes to the landscape materials, wall materials, wall alignment, entry design, and streetscape design, which are consistent with the conceptual design set forth in the design guidelines, contained within in the Specific Plan. • Minor changes to the design guidelines, which are intended to be conceptual in nature only, and are intended to be flexible in implementation. • Other modifications of similar nature to those listed above, which are deemed minor by the Planning Manager, which are in keeping with the purpose and intent of the approved La Quinta Village Specific Plan and which are in conformance with the General Plan. • Changes in site plan due to requirements from the electrical, phone, gas, sewer, or water purveyor. o Building changes from these types of changes can be approved by the Design and Development Director if it does not include more than seven (7) buildings on site and do not exceed the maximum height allowed. Prior to the Design and Development Director making a written determination as to the substantial conformance of a revised plan in accordance with the standards set forth in the approved La Quinta Village Specific Plan, the applicant shall prepare a written request that addresses the nature of the revisions and how the revised plan complies with the adopted Specific Plan standards. The applicant's request shall be accompanied by appropriate graphic and/or technical information that supports the revisions. Specific Plan Amendments Amendments to the La Quinta Village Specific Plan may be requested by the applicant by submitting the Specific Plan Amendment Application to the Design and Development Department with the required fees as required by the City Council. The request must comply with Section 65453(a) of the California Government Code and Chapter 9.240 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Amendments shall be processed pursuant to the provisions of the Government Code for Specific Plan Amendments. In the event the 18 77 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 proposed amendment requires supplemental environmental analysis pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the applicant(s) are responsible for preparing the necessary CEQA documentation. Any amendment will be subject to a public hearing requirement for which a 500 -foot radius notification of the public hearing will be required or will need to comply with the public hearing notification requirements of Section 9.200.100 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, whichever is the greater requirement. Modifications to Approved Grading Plan Final grading may vary from the project's approved Site Development Permit within the following restrictions: Finish grade elevations may vary by up or down .5 feet within the first 50 feet adjacent to the northerly property line and 1.0 feet up or down elsewhere on the site. 2. Final grading plans may be altered due to minor changes in building configuration, door locations, parking lot revisions, CVWD requirements and changes in ADA paths of access. Parking Requirements The Specific Plan allows standards to be different from those found in the City's Municipal Code. However, California Government Code Section 65915 does mandate specific parking standards when providing affordable units. Within the City's Municipal Code Section 9.60.260 (K), the By -Right parking incentive and parking ratios apply to the entire development and is not restricted to only the affordable units. The parking ratios are listed as follows: 1 -bedrooms require 1 parking space per unit and 2 -bedrooms require 1.5 spaces per unit. Although only 319 parking spaces are required per code, the minimum total parking spaces will exceed the number required. For the Community Center, 1 parking space for every 300 square feet of gross floor area shall be provided. The parking required for each unit will be sufficient for guest parking and encourage other modes of transportation. In addition to satisfying the required parking minimums, La Quinta Village Apartments will provide 196 extra parking stalls. Provision of future electric vehicle charging station connections is recommended and may be installed at a future date or as mandated per California Green Building Code (CalGreen). Carports and Garages In La Quinta Village Apartments, carports must have relatively flat or shed roof and be made of metal or photovoltaic panels to endure the harsh desert environment. Carports should be complementary to the architecture of the apartment buildings. For the safety of residents, the carports shall have lighting. All electrical conduits shall be screened from public view. Carports should be placed as close to the corresponding building as possible for the convenience of the future residents if parking stalls are assigned. 19 78 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The design of garages should also complement the architecture of the buildings with a similar roof and have a sectional garage door. For the safety of the residents, the garages shall have exterior lighting and all electric conduits shall be screened from public view. Trash Enclosures Trash enclosures shall comply with LQMC Section 9.100.200 in addition to the following standards outlined in the Specific Plan. Trash enclosures shall be placed in locations to be approved by the City of La Quinta and Burrtec Disposal to ensure the facility is accessible and secure. The location shall be outside public view as much as possible and be enclosed by block walls with metal gates and a pedestrian entrance. The walls of the trash enclosure shall complement the building in color and material. Fencing and Walls The function of walls and/or fences in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan will be to provide safety, security, and privacy to all the tenants. All fencing shall complement the architecture and landscaping on-site. Block walls and fencing in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall comply with LQMC Section 9.60.010 and the following: • Maximum height of 6 -feet except for tennis/pickleball courts may be 16 -feet. • Block walls are the preferred barrier along the perimeter. • In areas where existing masonry walls are present and in good condition, the walls will be stuccoed and painted to match. In areas where there is either no wall or fence, a new six -foot -high masonry wall will be erected as indicated by landscape plans. • A minimum six -foot -high decorative masonry wall will be necessary along both public streets to reduce the noise levels impinging on the residential uses. • To provide surface relief on block walls along the frontage, there shall be a decorative pilasters placed at the project entries. • Block walls shall be composed of masonry block with a decorative cap and matching grout. • Gates shall be aesthetically pleasing and automatic as opposed to manual. Gates shall have a Knox Box or other means of access for police and fire emergencies as approved by the Riverside County Fire Department. • The use of vinyl, wood, wire, chain link, serpentine, and barbed wire fences are strictly prohibited and shall not be used anywhere on-site. • Chain link fencing shall only be allowed for use around the perimeter of pickle ball and/or tennis courts. • Fencing shall be allowed to be within perimeter landscaping setbacks and around above -ground retention basin areas. 20 79 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Lighting All on-site lighting shall comply with LQMC Section 9.100.150 and the following: • Lighting within the project site boundaries shall be complementary to the buildings and consistent with the scale and character of the project. • The adjoining properties shall be protected against glare of lighting fixtures and be designed to provide safety to the future residents. • Brightly colored and/or blinking lights are not allowed. • The location, design, type, and size of all exterior lighting shall be reviewed and approved by the City of La Quinta Planning Department and the Riverside County Sheriff Department. • A photometric plan with lumen intensity (candle -feet) and specification sheets that detail the material used will be required. Lighting on the property will be 1 - candle -foot on site and 0 -candle -foot at the property lines. • All lighting at the property line shall have back-flow screens to prevent spillover to the adjacent residential properties • All building mounted lighting shall be firmly attached to the building and shall not be capable of pivoting or being moved. When mounted on buildings adjacent to surrounding properties, lighting shall also be focused down directly on the ground to avoid spillover to adjacent properties. • All freestanding lighting in the parking area shall comply with the following: 1. The lights shall be contained lights with either a rounded fixture or shoebox fixture. 2. Lighting shall be focused directly down to prevent spillover to adjacent properties. 3. The total height of any freestanding fixture shall not exceed 18 -feet and shall have a metallic post. 4. The post shall connect to a concrete base with a beveled edge and decorative surface. Under no circumstance shall the base have the marking from the container that the concrete is formed in. 5. All connections between the pole and the base shall have a metal box screening the connection. 6. Lighting fixture placement shall provide the appropriate illumination for outdoor areas such as parking and pedestrian walkways. 7. The lighting level shall have the number of candle -feet that allows face recognition from 100 -feet. 8. Use of illuminated bollards for walkways is recommended. 21 80 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 9. Untreated bollards with rolled concrete are unacceptable and will not be allowed. Yellow bollards shall only be used when required by law but shall not have rolled concrete at the top of the bollard. 10. Whenever possible, bollards shall be used as a light fixture to enhance safety and provide additional amenity. Bollards not used for lighting shall have a decorative cover. 22 81 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 4 - Circulation Overview The La Quinta Village Specific Plan proposes to develop the adjacent street system in a manner consistent with the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. The property is located on Washington Street which is designated by the General Plan as a major arterial requiring a half street of 64 feet. The site also abuts Avenue 50 which is designated as a primary arterial for which the General Plan calls for a half street of 54 feet. Off -Site Circulation System The existing conditions around the site include partial improvements on both abutting public streets. The General Plan standards for improvements, which will be required in conjunction with this project, are consistent with other recent road improvements for both Washington Street and Avenue 50. The construction of the required improvements will continue the process of implementing the adopted General Plan Circulation Plan. Expanded pavement, curb, gutter, median and sidewalk/bike path improvements are planned for the project's two street frontages. Signal upgrades may be required in addition to relocation to the ultimate improvement location. On -Site Circulation System The 14.03 -acre site will be serviced by the main access on Washington Street and a secondary access on Avenue 50. The internal circulation is a driveway around the perimeter of the site which will have no dead -ends. The design also provides easy access for fire department and trash collection access to all buildings. Public Transportation A bus turnout and a relocated bus shelter on Washington Street is required as a part of the project's public street improvements per Sunline Transit requirements and Public Works Department. Prior to issuance of building permits for individual Site Development Permits, applicants shall submit a Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan to the Public Works and Design and Development Departments. The plans shall address capital improvement and operational standards as set forth in the City's TDM Ordinance. Any transit related improvements required by the Sunline Transit Agency as a condition to development will not constitute compliance with the plan submittal requirements. 23 82 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Section 5 - Design Guidelines Landscape Concepts This section of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan contains development standards, design concepts, guidelines, and special treatment plans for the implementation of landscaping throughout the site. The landscape material chosen shall be compatible with the desert climate, water efficient, and compliment the character of the surrounding community. A preliminary landscape plan can be seen below in Figure 2.4 Landscape Plan. -� ,F- FAL Figure 2.4, Conceptual Landscape Plan 24 83 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The landscape plan found in Figure 2.4 is conceptual and shall be approved by the Planning Commission via the Site Development Plan (SDP). The final landscape plan shall be approved by the Design and Development Director or his/her designee and shall be designed to perform the following functions: 1. Landscaping shall be in scale with adjacent buildings and be of an appropriate size at maturity to accomplish its intended purpose. 2. Provide a functional and aesthetically pleasing appearance. 3. Landscaping shall be used to complement the building architecture. 4. Landscaping shall comply with AB 1881 Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance and LQMC Section 8.13. 5. Provide a visual buffer of buildings from adjacent properties. 6. Provide landscape material that will provide shading and complement the architecture. 7. Provide an attractive and well-defined entrance and street frontage that will define the project. 8. Street frontages shall be consistent with the surrounding area. 9. Provide dust and erosion control during construction and natural color soil binder with native seasonal flowers to be used between phases with a 3 -year life to be replaced when needed. 10. Landscaping shall be used to screen undesirable views. 11. Preserve and protect the special attributes of the area and minimize adverse effects on the natural environment to the greatest extent possible. Approval Process 1. The conceptual landscape plan shall be approved by the City Council along with the Specific Plan and Site Development Permit. 2. The final landscape plan with all planting and irrigation details shall be approved by the Planning Manager prior to the issuance of a Building Permit. a) The final landscape plan shall include any direction provided by the Planning Commission and/or City Council. b) The Planning Manager can make minor changes to the landscape plan including moving of landscape areas or changes in species. c) Any appeals can be made subject to the appeal process on page 32 of this document and found in LQMC Section 9.200.1 10. 25 84 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Development Standards 1. Selected plant material shall be low maintenance and drought tolerant. 2. Plant materials shall be water efficient. 3. Landscape areas shall have decomposed granite, ground cover, crushed rock, boulders, and turf. The use of turf shall be limited by the requirements of the Coachella Valley Water District. 4. Plants are to be grouped with plants with similar needs and irrigation requirements for efficiency and optimal growth. 5. Desert friendly trees with canopies shall be planted throughout the site to provide shade to uncovered parking and outdoor gathering areas. 6. The canopy trees shall be a mixture of trees of different sizes such as 15 -gallon and 24 -inch box. The use of 15 -gallon trees shall not exceed 50% of the total number of canopy trees used on site. 7. Trees shall be planted no less than 10 feet on center to avoid crowding and overlapping of canopies. 8. All trees shall have an adequately sized planting area. Parking area planters shall be a minimum of 5 feet x 5 feet and be clearly shown on the final landscape plan. 9. All landscaping shall be within planters bounded by a curb at least six inches high in the parking area. 10. Root barriers shall be used when trees are planted within 5 feet of pedestrian walkways and buildings. 11. The parking lot area will be landscaped with one tree per 10-12 parking spaces except for where carports are located and the frontage along Washington Street. All trees shall be 24 -inch boxes. 12. All canopy trees shall be double staked to prevent swaying and shifting, which can damage the roots underground by breaking them. Palm trees are not required to have staking. 13. Plantings such as trees and/or shrubs shall not obstruct views for safety and security purposes and shall not interfere with fire equipment access. 14. All trees, shrubs, and ground covers must be properly maintained. All dead or dying plants shall be replaced within 10 days of being reported to the property owner. Maintenance for seasonal planting will be required in the off season to remove all dead or frost damaged growth, leaf litter, or other debris. Irrigation systems must be maintained to ensure survivability of plant material. 15. All landscaped areas shall be designed so that plant materials are protected from vehicle damage, encroachment, or overhang. 16. Concrete mow strips shall be used between different types of planting material or different colors of decomposed granite. 26 85 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 17. Use of redwood headers, metal dividers, and rubber tubing as a separation between planting materials is strictly prohibited. 18. The spacing of shrubs shall be appropriate to the species that is used. 19. Plant material shall not interfere with designated emergency areas, fire equipment, or electrical transformers. 20. Decorative gravel/crushed rock/ and/or decomposed granite may also be used as groundcover. The maximum size of decomposed granite shall be 3/8 - inch which ensures a variety of sizes. The gravel can be composed of rubble or cobble and should have a range of 4-6 inches diameter. 21. Maintenance of landscape shall be the responsibility of the property owner and shall be performed according to proper horticultural standards. 22. Nothing in this subsection shall preclude the installation of additional landscaping and the planting of additional trees which can be approved by the Planning Manager. 23. The perimeter landscaping setbacks shall be a minimum of 10 feet or be an average of 20 feet, including Washington Street and Avenue 50 frontages. Fencing and landscaped retention basins shall be allowed to encroach into the perimeter landscaping setbacks. The landscape concept follows a "lush oasis" theme while emphasizing water efficient materials, colors, and form. A planting palette is shown in Exhibits 37-41. Entry areas are treated with a formal layout of Date Palms, Palo Brea, and Mulga Trees that frame the entrance. Perimeter areas are treated with Indian Rosewood and Tipuana Tipu trees. The landscaping around the buildings will be Tipuana Tipu, Swan Hill, and Mulga which complement the architecture of the buildings. In general, the proposed landscaping will create an attractive street frontage and a pleasing environment for future residents. Signage Project identification signs are anticipated at each entry. The signage will be consistent with the City of La Quinta sign ordinance. Such signs shall be architecturally integrated with the wall and landscape designs and limited to one project identification sign on each frontage with no more than 24 square feet of sign face per sign. Other minor signs will be consistent with city or state/federal requirements. See Exhibit 42 - Entry for the main project (monument) sign. General Architectural Theme La Quinta Village Specific Plan will provide multiple family dwelling units and will endeavor to provide a welcoming atmosphere with open space to avoid the feeling of high bulk and density. The architecture will support this goal and provide a pleasant atmosphere for future residents of La Quinta Village Apartments. The La Quinta Village Specific Plan will include the following policy statements to support the goals of the City's General Plan and La Quinta Village Specific Plan: 1. Provide clean and crisp architectural forms and materials. 27 86 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 2. Indoor/outdoor spaces will blend with the landscape shape. 3. Provide the use of natural materials and colors to be reflective of the dramatic desert surroundings. 4. Architecture and Landscaping will complement each other and create a pleasant environment. 5. Maintain the Image Corridors on both Avenue 50 and Washington Street. The Image Corridors on Avenue 50 and Washington Street are measured 150 -feet from the right-of-way line as indicated on the parcel map and as shown on Exhibit 7. On Washington Street, Building 1 is completely within the 150 -foot image corridor setback and Building 6 is partial within the setback. Building 6 is 2 -story buildings and extend approximately 22 feet into the setback. In the final analysis, the view of the Santa Rosa Mountains is not impacted since they are to the north and west of the project site and are most impacted by the buildings on the other side of Washington Street. Therefore, this project has no impact on residential or vehicular views from Washington Street. Exhibit 33, View 8 confirms there is no impact on the view from Washington Street. On Avenue 50, Buildings 6 and 7 are entirely within the 150 -foot setback and within this Specific Plan allowable height requirements. Exhibit 33 shows Views 8, 9, and 10 that have the views from both Washington Street and Avenue 50. Views 8 and 9 show the impact of Avenue 50 from Buildings 6 and 7. A minuscule amount of the Santa Rosa Mountains view may be blocked, but the view will still be visible for people driving from the west. Notably, this view will mostly be impacted by other unrelated projects to the west. These renderings make it clear that the beautiful views of the Santa Rosa Mountains will still be visible. La Quinta is known for its stunning views and this project will not interfere with those views. Therefore, the Specific Plan will allow a maximum height of 28 feet within the 150 -foot Image Corridor. It will only apply to this property and not anywhere else in the City of La Quinta. Preserving the viewsheds is desirable to the developers of this Project because they will make it more desirable to future tenants. Creating more multi -family housing will benefit the City of La Quinta, the Coachella Valley, and Riverside County by helping to alleviate the housing crisis that we all face. La Quinta Village Apartments consists of two-story multiple -family dwelling buildings with a Spanish hacienda architectural style expressed with stucco finish, parapet walls, Spanish the roofing, stucco reglets, and metal railings. Exterior color schemes convey a traditional Spanish palette with hints of accent colors. The gated community also includes a clubhouse, carports, open space with meandering walking paths, several shade structures with barbeques and picnic tables, a putting green, pickleball court, dog park, shaded tot lot, and a pool area with a spa, cabanas, fire pits, and barbeques. 28 87 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Figure 1 - Primary entrance on Washington Street. The architectural site plan has a main access on Washington Street and a secondary access on Avenue 50. The clubhouse and pool will be placed at the terminus of the Washington Street entrance with four (4) buildings surrounding it. The remaining eight (8) buildings will frame the remainder of the property. The carports are located throughout the property so each building has convenient parking. The clubhouse, pool, cabanas, barbeque areas, and tot lot are at the center of the property. The dog park and pickleball courts are located on the south side adjacent to Avenue 50. Figure 2 - Rendering of entrance on Avenue 50. Carports sizes will vary and will have support columns with flat metal roofs or photovoltaic panels. The carports will be metal so that they can weather well in the harsh desert environment. 29 88 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The Spanish hacienda style clubhouse building will be a traditional white color with multi- level roofs, architectural pop -outs, door and window trims, and louvred awnings over the front windows. The main clubhouse room includes bi-fold doors to provide an indoor - outdoor relationship to the pool deck area. The pool deck area includes access to the pool, spa, showers, and restrooms. The residential buildings will be similar in concept and composed of traditional Spanish tones including white, off-white, and brown with accent colors. Covered breezeways provide access from both sides (long side) of each building with a stairway. The buildings will have architectural pop -outs for surface relief and a multi -height roofline. The facades will be detailed with stucco reglets creating a geometric pattern which will subtly enhance the building design. The exterior doors and windows will have a header stucco trim to provide relief. Each unit will have a door that leads to a covered balcony with a tube steel railing painted black in a decorative design or to a covered patio with a low wall. Vinyl windows and fiberglass doors will be bronze in color to provide a contrast to the light stucco wall colors. Each of the long sides of the buildings will have separate units on each side. The units will not have a railroad flat floor plan. The ends of the buildings include architectural pop -outs and stucco recessed niches for surface relief. Buildings are designed as four-sided architecture with the street view facade very similar to the courtyard facade. To prevent clutter, electric and water meters will be screened at the breezeways of each apartment building. Figure 3 - View on Avenue 50 looking towards Washington Street intersection with mountains in the background. The architecture will provide a positive living space for the future residents and make a positive contribution to this neighborhood of La Quinta and to the city as a whole. The administration and implementation section of this document is provided herein to further define the relationship between the La Quinta Village Specific Plan, City of La Quinta development codes and standards, and the process by which the La Quinta Village Specific Plan will obtain additional discretionary approvals as the project proceeds through the phases of the development process. 30 89 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 Administrative Plan 1. La Quinta Village Specific Plan Upon its approval/adoption, the La Quinta Village Specific Plan as approved by the La Quinta City Council will become the primary document governing land use regulations. The La Quinta Village Specific Plan has development standards and land use regulations that will replace the corresponding standards in the City of La Quinta's Municipal Code. Where the Specific Plan does not address a standard or subject, the applicable City code and/or ordinance shall apply. The Corresponding Site Development for the La Quinta Village Apartments shall run with the property once the project is built and is transferrable to future owners of the property. The Site Development Permit shall expire if a building permit is not issued within two (2) years from approval of the Second Reading of the Specific Plan by the City Council. Prior to the expiration of the Site Development Permit, the property owner may apply for a two (2) year time extension to be approved by the Planning Commission on an annual basis. The time extension must be submitted prior to the expiration date of the project. 2. Interpretation Unless otherwise provided, should ambiguities occur concerning the content and appropriate application of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan, said ambiguities shall be resolved by the Planning Manager of the City of La Quinta or his/her designee, in a manner most consistent with the intent, goals and policies set forth in the La Quinta Village Specific Plan and the City's General Plan as outlined in Section 9.200.1 10. The Director's decision is appealable to the Design and Development Director and or Planning Commission in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code. Implementation Program According to Government Code 65451 of the California Planning Law, the La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall include a program for implementation including regulations, conditions, programs, and additional measures as necessary to carry out the plan. In response to this requirement, the Implementation Program for the SP and Mitigated Negative Declaration consists of the following: 1. Environmental Review and Mitigation Monitoring Program The Specific Plan has been subjected to Environmental Review pursuant to the provisions of CEQA for a Mitigated Negative Declaration. The Mitigation Measures adopted for this project shall comply during all stages and phases of the project's construction and operation of the facility. 2. Adoption of the La Quinta Village Specific Plan and Approval of the Site Development Permit. 31 90 La Quinta Village Specific Plan City of La Quinta Amendment No. 2 The La Quinta Village Specific Plan shall be approved by Ordinance which includes a first reading, second reading, and then take effect 30 days after the second reading. The Site Development Permit will be processed concurrently with the Specific Plan and shall take effect after the 30 -days have expired. 3. Grading and Improvement Plans A Precise Grading Plan (PGP) will be submitted to the City for approval Site Development Permit. Approval of a grading plan(s) will allow the developer(s) to begin grading the site for development. A National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), PM -10 Plan, and hydrology study will be required prior to approval of the PGP. Improvement plans such as street, water, sewer, and drainage plans will need to be submitted to the City of La Quinta and all affected agencies for review and approval prior to issuance of a grading permit(s). 4. Project Maintenance During construction, maintenance of all facilities will be the responsibility of the developer. After the property has been improved, ongoing maintenance of private facilities including streets, street lighting, landscaping, entry documentation and similar items will be the responsibility of the property owner. Site Development Permit Site-specific development of the site shall be subject to Site Development Permit and approval by both the Planning Commission and City Council for the City of La Quinta. If the Specific Plan is processed separately from the Site Development Permit, then the Site Development Permit shall be acted on by the La Quinta Planning Commission. 32 91 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 10, 2023 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2023-1000 FOR ZONING CODE LANGUAGE CLEAN UP AND CHANGES TO GAME COURT, FLAGPOLE AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT (ADU) REGULATIONS. CEQA: THE PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 15061 (b)(3), COMMON SENSE EXEMPTION. LOCATION: CITY-WIDE RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution recommending City Council approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2023-1000 for zoning code language clean up and changes to game court, flagpole, and accessory dwelling unit (ADU) regulations, and find that these text amendments are exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of the California Environmental Quality Act, Common Sense Exemption. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Planning Staff periodically reviews the municipal zoning code and proposes amendments to update or clarify these items. • The proposed text amendments include updating language to meet State housing law regulations for ADUs. These text amendments implement a Program identified in the City's certified Housing Element 2021-2029. • The proposed text amendments include modifying standards for tennis and game courts, flagpoles, the minimum front yard setback for garages in residential zones, and zoning code language clean up regarding the Floodplain District. • In order to approve the project, the Planning Commission (PC) must make findings for the Zoning Ordinance Amendment (ZOA2023-1000). They are included in the attached Resolution and as Attachment 1. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Zoning Text Amendments Council has periodically adopted zoning code (Code) updates in order to clean up language and clarify standards. The Code amendments are included as text amendment redlines as Exhibit A in the PC resolution. A matrix of proposed amendments (Attachment 2) summarizes each amendment and lists the code section where the amendments are found. The proposed amendments are explained below: 1. Accessory Dwelling Units. Update regulations to meet State housing law: a. Clarifies that ADUs can be attached to or located within a detached garage located on the same lot as the primary dwelling. b. Increases the total floor area allowed for ADUs from 800 square feet to 850 square feet, or 1,000 square feet for a unit that provides more than one bedroom, if the primary dwelling is less than 1,600 square feet. c. Construction of an ADU shall not constitute a Group R occupancy change under the Building Code, unless the Building Official or Code Compliance Officer makes a written finding based on substantial evidence that the construction of the ADU could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety. Building Official may change the occupancy code of a space that was uninhabitable space or was only permitted for nonresidential use to be converted for residential use. Group R occupancy change may require rated separation/construction. d. No parking requirements for an ADU that is submitted with a permit application to create a new dwelling unit provided that the ADU or parcel satisfies any other instances such as location within'/2 mile walking distance of public transit, ADU is located within a historic district, and the ADU is part of the primary residence or an accessory structure. e. ADUs may be located within the front yard setback if an 800 square foot ADU cannot be located in any other location on the site with four -foot side and rear yard setbacks and in compliance with all other development standards. f. For ADUs that comply with the four feet rear and side yard setbacks, a junior accessory dwelling unit (JADU) may be added on the same parcel, with the following additional standards: • ADU height limit of 16 feet on a lot with an existing or new single- family or multifamily dwelling. • ADU height of 18 feet for a detached ADU where the parcel is within one '/z mile walking distance of a major transit stop or high-quality transit corridor. • An additional two feet in height is allowed to accommodate a roof pitch on the ADU that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. • Height of 18 feet for a detached ADU on an existing or proposed multifamily, multistory dwelling. 93 Height of 25 feet or the height limitation that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower, for an attached ADU to a primary dwelling. g. ADUs are allowed in existing multifamily dwellings. If the existing multifamily dwelling has rear or side setbacks of less than four feet, no modification of the existing multifamily dwelling shall be required. h. Construction of new ADU shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling unit. Demolition permit for a detached garage that is replaced with an ADU shall be reviewed with the application for the ADU and issued at the same time. No noticing for the demolition shall be required. Director denial of an application for an ADU or JADU shall include written comments to the applicant of how the application can be remedied by the applicant. Written comments from the Director shall be returned to the applicant within 60 days of the application being found complete. k. An application for an ADU and JADU cannot be denied on the basis of non- conforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safety and are not affected by the construction of the ADU. 2. Tennis and other Game Courts. Modify standards to allow tennis and other game courts (such as pickleball) at existing grade to be set back at least 10 feet from front, side, or rear property lines where a block wall six (6) feet in height exists or is required to be constructed along those property lines. The current Code requires that tennis and other game courts be set back at least 20 feet from the front property line, and 10 feet from the side or rear property lines, and requires that the court be lower in grade by four feet from the surrounding grade if located within 30 feet of any side or rear property line. 3. Flagpoles. Where the yard abuts open space, a golf course, or a street, allow flagpoles to be located at least five feet from the property line. The current Code prohibits flagpoles located on yards that abut another residential lot, and this would remain in place. The current Code allows flagpoles on yards that front a street or open space or a golf course, but with a minimum 10 -foot setback from the property line. 4. Garage setback from front yard. Remove the 25 -foot setback requirement for garages; the 20 -foot setback for the building would remain in place. The Code currently has a footnote that states that roll -up garage doors are allowed to be setback 20 ft. The purpose of the current Code 25 -foot setback for garages was to account for tilt up (overhead) garage doors, which are now outdated, and rare types of garage doors. Roll -up doors are now most common. 94 5. FP Floodplain District. Remove the word "Overlay" from the Code language that refers to the Floodplain District as a "Floodplain Overlay District". The Floodplain District is a base district, not an overlay district; this correction will make it consistent with other Code sections that refer to the Floodplain District. PUBLIC REVIEW Public Notice This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on September 29, 2023. No comments have been received. Any written comments received will be handed out at the Planning Commission hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department has determined that the project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of CEQA, Common Sense Exemption, in that it can be seen that the project would not cause any adverse impacts on the environment. Prepared by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. Findings 2. Code Change Matrix 95 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVE A ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT FOR ZONING CODE LANGUAGE CLEAN UP AND CHANGES TO GAME COURT, FLAGPOLE AND ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS (ADU) REGULATIONS AND FIND THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT. CASE NUMBER: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2023-1000 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on October 10, 2023, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider a Zoning Ordinance Amendment for zoning code clean up and changes to game court, flagpole, and Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) regulations; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on September 29, 2023, as prescribed by the Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Zoning Ordinance Amendment [Exhibit A]: 1. Consistency with General Plan The code amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. The proposed amendments are supported by Policy LU -1.2 for land use decisions to be consistent with General Plan policies and programs and uphold the rights and needs of property owners and the public; and 2. Public Welfare Approval of the code amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. The amendments meet State housing law regulations for development of ADUs, allow for site design flexibility for various residential features, clarifies language in the municipal zoning code, and does not incorporate any changes that affect the regulation and/or provision of public services, utility systems, or other foreseeable health, safety and welfare considerations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: ., PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2023-1000 PROJECT: 2023 CODE TUNE UP ADOPTED: PAGE 2OF2 SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the Planning Commission in this case; and SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission has determined that the project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15061 (b)(3) of CEQA, Common Sense Exemption, in that it can be seen that the project would not cause any adverse impacts on the environment; and SECTION 3. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2023-1000, as set forth in attached Exhibit A, to the City Council for the reasons set forth in this Resolution; and PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission, held on October 10, 2023, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: DANNY CASTRO, Design and Development Director City of La Quinta, California STEPHEN T. NIETO, Chairperson City of La Quinta, California WT PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2023 -XXX ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 2023-1000 PROJECT: 2023 CODE TUNE UP 9.50.030 - Table of development standards. A. Definitions. See Chapter 9.280. EXHIBIT A B. Table of Standards. Table 9-2 and the illustrations in Section 9.50.040, following, set forth standards for the development of property within residential districts. However, standards different from those in Table 9-2 shall apply if special zoning symbols described in Section 9.20.030 are designated on the official zoning map. Table 9-2 Residential Development Standards Development Standard District RVL RL RC RM RMH RH Minimum lot size for single-family dwellings 20,000 7,200 7,200 5,000 3,600 2,000 (sq. ft.) Minimum project size for multifamily projects n/a n/a n/a n/a 20,000 20,000 (sq. ft.) Minimum lot frontage for single-family 100 60 60 50 40 n/a dwellings (ft.) Minimum frontage for n/a n/a n/a n/a 100 100 multifamily projects (ft.) Maximum structure 28 28 17 28 28 40 height (ft.) 2 Maximum number of 2 2 1 2 2 3 stories Minimum front yard 30 20 20 20 20 20 setback (ft.) 3 Minimum gar -age sem} 30 2� 2-52-52-52-54 Minimum interior/exterior side 10/20 5/10 5/10 5/10 5/10 10/15 yard setback (ft.) s',- 20 for new Minimum rear yard lots and 10 setback (ft.)76 30 for existing 10 15 15 20 recorded lots 87 Maximum lot coverage 40 50 60 60 60 60 (% of net lot area) Minimum livable area 2,500 1,400 1,200 1,400 1,400 (multifamily: 750 for excluding excluding garage (sq. ft.) multifamily Minimum common open n/a n/a n/a 30% 30% 30% area 65 Minimum/average perimeter landscape 10/20 10/20 n/a 10/20 10/20 10/20 setbacks (ft.) 65 Symbol Description of Special Zoning Symbols Used as per Section 9.20.030 60 -RM -10,000 60 -foot minimum lot frontage, medium density residential zoning, 10,000 17/1 square foot minimum lot size, 17 -foot maximum building height at one story RL 10,000 Low density residential zoning, 10,000 square foot minimum lot size, 17 -foot 17/1 maximum building height at one story 10 Development Standard District RVL RL RC RM RMH RH RM Medium density residential zoning, 17 -foot maximum building height at one 17/1 story RL Low density residential zoning, 17 -foot maximum building height at one story 17/1 * As shown on the approved specific plan for the project. ** As provided in the underlying base district. 1 Minimum lot frontage on cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be 35 feet. Minimum lot frontage for flag lots shall be 15 feet. 2 Not including basements. Also, notwithstanding above table, the maximum structure height equals 22 feet for all buildings within 150 feet of any general plan -designated image corridor, except in the RC zone, which is 17 feet. Any proposed building height over 22 feet requires minor use permit approval and shall not exceed a maximum building height of the existing zone. 3 , Pprojects with 5 or more adjacent single-family dwelling units facing the same street shall incorporate front setbacks varying between 20 feet and 25 feet or more in order to avoid streetscape monotony. For side -entry type garages, the garage setback may be reduced to 20 feet in the RVL district and 15 feet in all other residential districts. 54 The following are exceptions to the minimum side setbacks shown: For interior side yards in the RL, RM and RMH districts, if the building is over 17 feet in height, the setback is 5 feet plus 1 foot for every foot over 17 feet in height or fraction thereof, to a maximum setback of 10 feet. The additional setback may be provided entirely at grade level or a combination of at grade and airspace above the 17 -foot building. For RH, 5 feet minimum plus 1 foot additional setback for every foot of building height above 28 feet, or fraction thereof, up to a maximum setback of 15 feet when said height above 17 feet is located between 5 and 10 feet from said side yard property line. For interior setbacks, if the building is over 28 feet in height the setback is 10 feet plus 1 foot for every foot over 28 feet in height or fraction thereof, to a maximum setback of 15 feet. The additional setback may be provided entirely at grade level or may be a combination of at grade and airspace above the 28 -foot building height. 65 Common open area and perimeter landscape requirements do not apply to single-family detached projects unless a specific plan is required. Common open area equals percent of net project area. Perimeter landscape setbacks are adjacent to perimeter streets: first number equals minimum at any point; second number equals minimum average over entire frontage (thus, 10/20). See Section 9.60.230 and additional landscape/open area standards. 76 Rear and side yard setbacks for residential units abutting the image corridor shall be a minimum of 25 feet with the exception of RVL zone district where it only applies to the side yard. 87 Existing recorded lots prior to May 1, 1997. ( Ord. 588 § 2(Exh. A), 2-2-2021; Ord. 584 § 2, 2020; Ord. 562 § 1, 2017; Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 466 § 1, 2009; Ord. 434 § 2, 2007; Ord. 325 § 1, 1998; Ord. 299 § 1, 1997; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) N• 9.60.090 Accessory dwelling units. A. Purpose. This section provides standards and criteria for the establishment of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units, consistent with California Government Code Section 65852.2, subdivision (a)(1) and 65852.22. Accessory dwelling units shall be permitted only in the zones that allow single family or multifamily uses: RVL, RL, RC, RM, RMH, RH, CR, CP, CC, CN, TC, CO and VC zone districts. Junior accessory dwelling units are permitted in single family zones: RVL, RL, RC, RM, RMH, and RH zone districts. B. Definitions. See Chapter 9.280. For purposes of this section, "second residential unit," "second dwelling unit," "second unit," and "granny flat" as defined in Section 9.280.030 (or successor section) shall not apply, and, instead, "accessory dwelling unit" as defined in California Government Code Section 65852.2(i)(4) (or successor section in the Government Code) shall apply. An accessory dwelling unit shall be either "attached" or "detached" to the primary residence as described in Government Code Section 65852.2(i)(4) (or successor statute). In addition, the following definitions shall apply for purposes of this section: 1. "Junior accessory dwelling unit" means a unit that is no less than one hundred fifty (150) square feet and no more than five hundred (500) square feet in size and contained entirely within a single-family residence. A junior accessory dwelling unit may include separate sanitation facilities, or may share sanitation facilities with the existing structure. 2. "Living area" shall have the same meaning as California Government Code Section 65852.2(i)(1) (or successor section in the Government Code), notwithstanding any provision in Section 9.280.030 of this code to the contrary. 3. "Primary residence" shall have the same meaning as "dwelling, main or Primary residence" as defined in Section 9.280.030 (or successor section). 4. "Public transit" means a location, including but not limited to, a bus stop or train station, where the public may access buses, trains, subways, and other forms of transportation that charge set fares, run on fixed routes and are available to the public (consistent with Government Code Section 65852.2, subdivision 0)(9). C. Standards for Accessory Dwelling Units. The following standards shall apply to accessory dwelling units: 1. Except as provided in Government Code Section 65852.26, the accessory dwelling unit may be rented separate from the primary residence, but may not be sold or otherwise conveyed separate from the primary residence. 2. The lot is zoned to allow single-family or multifamily dwelling use and includes a proposed or existing dwelling. 3. The accessory dwelling unit is either attached to, or located within, the proposed or existing primary dwelling, including attached garages, storage areas or similar uses, or an accessory structure or detached from the proposed or existing primary dwelling and located on the same lot as the proposed or existing primary dwelling, including detached garages. 4. The total floor area of an attached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed fifty (50) percent of the primary dwelling or eight hundred fift�r (899850) square feefeet, or 1,000 square feet for a unit that provides more than one bedroom, if the primary dwelling is less than one thousand six hundred (1,600) square feet. 5. The total floor area for a new detached accessory dwelling unit shall not exceed one thousand two hundred (1,200) square feet. 6. An accessory dwelling unit shall include a kitchen and bathroom. (Supp. No. 3, Update 2) Created: 2022-11-20 16:31:11 [EST] Page 1 of 5 100 7. An efficiency unit as defined by Section 17958.1 of the California Health and Safety Code must be a minimum of one hundred fifty (150) square feet. 8. No passageway shall be required in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit. 9. No setback shall be required for an existing living area or accessory structure or a structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure that is converted to an accessory dwelling unit or to a portion of an accessory dwelling unit, and a setback of no more than four (4) feet from the side and rear lot lines shall be required for an accessory dwelling unit that is not converted from an existing structure or a new structure constructed in the same location and to the same dimensions as an existing structure. 10. The building code requirements in effect at the time a building permit is secured shall apply to detached dwellings. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not constitute a Group R occupancy change under the building code, as described in Section 310 of the California Building Code (Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations), unless the building official or Code Compliance officer makes a written finding based on substantial evidence in the record that the construction of the accessory dwelling unit could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety. Nothing in this clause shall be interpreted to prevent the Building Official from changing the occupancy code of a space that was unhabitable space or was only permitted for nonresidential use and was subsequently converted for residential use pursuant to this section. 11. The accessory dwelling unit must be approved by the Riverside County Department of Environmental Health and the Regional Water Quality Control Board where a private sewage disposal system is being used or proposed. 12. Parking requirements for accessory dwelling units shall not exceed one (1) parking space per accessory dwelling unit or per bedroom, whichever is less. These spaces may be provided as tandem parking on a driveway. a. Off-street parking shall be permitted in setback areas or through tandem parking, unless specific findings are made that parking in setback areas or tandem parking is not feasible based upon specific site or regional topographical or fire and life safety conditions. b. There shall be no additional parking requirement for an accessory dwelling unit in any of the following instances: i. The accessory dwelling unit is located within one-half (1/2) mile walking distance of public transit. ii. The accessory dwelling unit is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district. iii. The accessory dwelling unit is part of the proposed or existing primary residence or an accessory structure. iv. When on -street parking permits are required but not offered to the occupant of the accessory dwelling unit. V. When there is a car share vehicle located within one (1) block of the accessory dwelling unit. vi. When a permit application for an accessory dwellina unit is submitted with a permit (Supp. No. 3, Update 2) application to create a new single-family dwelling or a new multifamily dwelling on the same lot. provided that the accessory dwellina unit or the parcel satisfies anv other criteria listed in this subsection Created: 2022-11-20 16:31:11 [EST] Page 2 of 5 101 C. When a garage, carport, or covered parking structure is demolished in conjunction with the construction of an accessory dwelling unit or converted to an accessory dwelling unit, those off-street parking spaces need not be replaced. 13. One (1) accessory dwelling unit and one (1) junior accessory dwelling unit is permitted per lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling if all of the following apply: a. The accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit is within the proposed space of a single-family dwelling or existing space of a single-family dwelling or accessory structure and may include an expansion of not more than one hundred fifty (150) square feet beyond the same physical dimensions as the existing accessory structure. An expansion beyond the physical dimensions of the existing accessory structure shall be limited to accommodating ingress and egress. b. The space has exterior access from the proposed or existing single-family dwelling. C. The side and rear setbacks are sufficient for fire and safety. d. The front yard setback of the underlying zone shall apply, unless either the attached or detached units does not permit at least an 800 square foot accessory dwelling unit with four -foot side and rear yard setbacks to be constructed in compliance with all other development standards. The junior accessory dwelling unit complies with the requirements of California Government Code Section 65852.22. 14. One (1) detached, new construction, accessory dwelling unit that does not exceed four (4) -foot side and rear yard setbacks for a lot with a proposed or existing single-family dwelling. The accessory dwelling unit may be combined with a junior accessory dwelling unit described in subsection D, if the accessory dwelling unit+t complies with the following: A total floor area limitation of not more than eight hundred (800) square feet. A height limitation of sixteen (16) feet on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit. C. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed single family or multifamily dwelling unit that is within one-half of one mile walking distance of a major transit stop or a high-quality transit corridor, as those terms are defined in Section 21155 of the Public Resources Code. d. An additional two feet in height to accommodate a roof pitch on the accessory dwelling unit that is aligned with the roof pitch of the primary dwelling unit. e. A height of 18 feet for a detached accessory dwelling unit on a lot with an existing or proposed multifamily, multistory dwelling. f. A height of 25 feet or the height limitation that applies to the primary dwelling, whichever is lower, for an accessory dwelling unit that is attached to a primary dwelling. 15. Multiple accessory dwelling units are permitted within the portions of existing multifamily dwelling structures that are not used as livable space, including, but not limited to, storage rooms, boiler rooms, passageways, attics, basements, or garages, if each unit complies with state building standards for dwellings. One (1) accessory dwelling unit is permitted within an existing multifamily dwelling and up to twenty-five (25) percent of the existing multifamily dwelling units may contain an accessory dwelling unit. (Supp. No. 3, Update 2) Created: 2022-11-20 16:31:11 [EST] Page 3 of 5 102 Not more than two (2) accessory dwelling units that are located on a lot that has an existing multifamily dwelling, but are detached from that multifamily dwelling are permitted, and are subject to a -height limits$f sixteen (16) fee as listed in subsection 14, and four (4) -foot rear yard and side setbacks. C. If the existing multifamily dwelling has a rear or side setback of less than four feet, no modification of the existing multifamily dwelling shall be required. 16. Accessory dwelling units shall not be required to provide fire sprinklers if they are not required for the primary residence. The construction of an accessory dwelling unit shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling. 17. A demolition permit for a detached garage that is to be replaced with an accessory dwelling unit shall be reviewed with the application for the accessory dwelling unit and issued at the same time. The applicant shall not be required to provide written notice or post a placard for the demolition of a detached garage that is to be replaced with an accessory dwelling unit, unless the property is located within an architecturally and historically significant historic district. 4-718. An accessory dwelling unit that is rented must be rented for terms longer than thirty (30) days. Under no circumstances shall an accessory dwelling unit be eligible for a short short- term vacation rental permit. 4-819. In the event of any conflicts between the standards set forth in this section and those set forth in the regulations of the applicable zoning district, the provisions of this section shall prevail. 420. The applicant shall pay to the city all applicable fees imposed on such new development of an accessory dwelling unit or new or rehabilitated primary residence that will include an accessory dwelling unit, provided, however, that no impact fee shall be imposed upon the development of an accessory dwelling unit less than seven hundred fifty (750) square feet, and any impact fees charged for an accessory dwelling unit of seven hundred fifty (750) square feet or more shall be charged proportionately in relation to the square footage of the primary dwelling unit. D. Standards for Junior Accessory Dwelling Units. The following standards shall apply for junior accessory dwelling units: 1. Junior accessory dwelling units shall be limited to one (1) per residential lot zoned for single- family residences with a single-family residence already built or proposed to be built, on the lot. 2-. The single family residenGe OR whiGh the j i ry dwelliRg URit Will GGGUF must be ewnor is Rethor ..OV8Fnmon+ol o i loud trust, er hE) Uoinn n zatinn 23. Prior to issuance of occupancy approval of the accessory dwelling unit, the city may require the property owner to enter into a restrictive covenant with the city prohibiting the sale of the junior accessory dwelling unit separate from the sale of the single-family residence, including a statement that the deed restriction may be enforced against future purchasers; and restricting the size and attributes of the junior accessory dwelling unit that conforms with this section. 34. A junior accessory dwelling unit must be constructed within the walls of the proposed or existing single-family residence. 46. A junior accessory dwelling shall provide a separate entrance from the main entrance to the proposed or existing single-family residence. 56. A junior accessory dwelling unit shall include an efficiency kitchen, which shall include all of the following: (Supp. No. 3, Update 2) Created: 2022-11-20 16:31:11 [EST] Page 4 of 5 103 a. A cooking facility with appliances, and b. A food preparation counter and storage cabinets that are of reasonable size in relation to the size of the junior accessory dwelling unit. 67. Parking: A junior accessory dwelling unit shall not require parking in addition to that required for the proposed or existing single-family residence. 78. For the purposes of providing service for water, sewer, or power, including a connection fee, a junior accessory dwelling unit shall not be considered a separate or new dwelling unit. E. A permit application for an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit shall be considered and approved ministerially without discretionary review or a hearing. The director, or his/her designee, shall act on the application within sixty (60) days from the date the application is found complete if there is an existing single-family or multifamily dwelling on the lot. If the permit application to create an accessory dwelling unit or a junior accessory dwelling unit is submitted with a permit application to create a new single-family dwelling on the lot, the director may delay acting on the permit application for the accessory dwelling unit or the junior accessory dwelling unit until the issuance of a building permit for the new single-family dwelling. If the applicant requests a delay, the sixty (60) -day time period shall be tolled for the period of the delay. 1. If the director denies an application for an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit, the director shall, within the time period described above, return in writing a full set of comments to the applicant with a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied by the applicant. 2. The director shall not deny an application for a permit to create an accessory dwelling unit due to the correction of nonconforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safetV and are not affected bV the construction of the accessory dwelling unit. F. If an application for an accessory dwelling unit or junior accessory dwelling unit is submitted or required to be submitted with any other applications that require or permit ministerial or discretionary review under the code, nothing in this section precludes the processing and review of those other applications pursuant to those other provisions in the code. ( Ord. 602 Exh. A, 2022; Ord. 588 § 2(Exh. A), 2-2-2021; Ord. 561 § 1, 2017; Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 445 § 2, 2007; Ord. 299 § 1, 1997; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) (Supp. No. 3, Update 2) Created: 2022-11-20 16:31:11 [EST] Page 5 of 5 104 9.60.150 - Tennis and other game courts. A. Permits Required. Construction of tennis and other game courts, including fencing, may be permitted as indicated in Section 9.40.030. Enclosed game courts shall comply with Section 9.60.050, Storage and other accessory buildings. All lighted game courts, where permitted, shall require approval of a minor use permit by the director or conditional use permit by the planning commission processed in accordance with Section 9.210.020. B. Development Standards. Game courts shall meet the following minimum development standards: 1. Fences. A maximum twelve (12) -foot -high fence (measured from the finished grade of the court) shall be allowed. Fences may include a dark, nonreflective screening material. If the fencing is chain link, it shall be vinyl -coated or painted in a dark color such as dark green or black. 2. Setbacks. Minimum setbacks from property lines for game courts shall be: a. Front yard: twenty (20) feet. b. Side yard: ten (10) feet. c. Rear yard: ten (10) feet. The preceding minimum setbacks shall be increased by three (3) feet for every foot of abutting court fence height over eight (8) feet. ln�diaddition, Of +r^m a side or roar property lino is loss than thirty (30) foo+e g �the finish grade of the nor+ shall be a l 3. Block Wall. Where the tennis or -game court is setback 10 to 30 feet from the front, side, or rear property lines, a block wall six (feet) in height shall exist or shall be constructed along those property lines. 43. Lighting. Game court lighting shall conform to the requirements of Section 9.60.160 (Outdoor lighting). In addition, a maximum of eight (8) lights (i.e., eight (8) individual light sources) shall be permitted and mounting standard height shall not exceed eighteen (18) feet measured from the court surface. Courts shall not be lighted after 10:00 p.m. 54. Glare. The surface area of any game court shall be designed, painted, colored and/or textured to reduce the reflection from any light source. 65. Landscaping. Landscaping shall be installed and maintained between the court fence and property line. A landscape plan shall be submitted with the building permit application, reviewed and approved by the director, and implemented at the same time as court construction. ( Ord. 584 § 2, 2020; Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 299 § 1, 1997; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) 105 9.60.340 - Flagpoles. Flagpoles shall be allowed in all residential zoning districts subject to the following standards: A. Height of flagpoles shall not exceed twenty (20) feet. B. Flagpoles shall not bea-r-e allowed within any yard, except if a yard abutst+ng another resiidontial I„+open space, a golf course, or a street, flagpoles shall maintain a minimum setback distance of 5 feet from the property line that abuts open space, a golf course, or a street. The minimi im sethaGk for flagpoles shall be ton (10) foot fre m any nreperty lino C. Installation of flagpoles shall require a building permit. D. Flagpoles that were installed prior to February 14, 2019, but otherwise meet the height limitation in this section, shall be allowed to remain in place so long as a building permit is obtained if there was no building permit issued previously. Proof of installation or existence of flagpoles prior to February 14, 2019 may be required. 106 9.110.060 - FP Floodplain District. A. Purpose and Intent. To protect life and property from flood flows and to establish criteria for land use consistent with state law and with the criteria promulgated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. B. Development Standards. Development standards shall be as required for needed flood control improvements and shall conform to the supplemental requirements for the FP district set forth in Section 9.140.030. C. District Boundaries. The FP „district shall include all areas within the city that are designated as "Special Flood Hazard Areas Inundated by One Hundred -Year Flood" on Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) provided by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). These include the "A" and "AO" flood hazard zones. The boundaries of the FP district are generally shown on the official zoning map. See FEMA FIRM maps for specific locations. (Ord. 550 § 1, 2016; Ord. 284 § 1, 1996) 107 ATTACHMENT 1 FINDINGS Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2023-1000 Consistency with General Plan The code amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan. The proposed amendments are supported by Policy LU -1.2 for land use decisions to be consistent with General Plan policies and programs and uphold the rights and needs of property owners and the public. 2. Public Welfare Approval of the code amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare. The amendments meet State housing law regulations for development of accessory dwelling units (ADU), allow for site design flexibility for various residential features, and clarifies language in the municipal zoning code, and does not incorporate any changes that affect the regulation and/or provision of public services, utility systems, or other foreseeable health, safety, and welfare considerations. 108 ATTACHMENT 2 Suggested Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) regulations per state law 9.60.090 Changes in state law. Minimum garage setback for residential - change Change standard to what footnote says --roll up doors are most to 20 ft instead of 25 in RL and up 9.50.030 common now. Remove the requirement that court must be lower grade; allow at least 10 feet from front, side, and rear setbacks with 6 -foot Tennis and other Game Courts 9.60.150 block wall along property lines. Where the yard abuts open space, a golf course, or a street, allow flagpoles to be located at least 5 feet from the property Flagpoles 9.60.340 line. Floodplain District — remove the word "Overlay" Consistency with other code sections that call FP a base district from "Floodplain Overlay District" 9.110.060 not overlay. 109 POWERPOINTS PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 2023 Planning Commission Meeting October 10, 2023 5:00 p.m. J ` �J •4 ^M1 CAL N Planning Commission Meeting October 10, 2023 PH1 — La Quinta Village Apartment Project EA2022-0001, GPA2022-0002, SP2022-00019 & SDP2022-0001 CALIPTCII=-�„�=' 'J”. Project Location _ --� a W an d .. Council Hearing • August 1, 2023, Council asked the applicant to make changes to the project including: — Change architectural style to Spanish Hacienda — Reduce buildings to two-story only — Remove garages on north side of site • Applications remanded to Commission due to these changes Project Changes • Site plan layout changed to accommodate 252 units — Architectural style Spanish Hacienda — 12 buildings in project, all are two story — Garages removed • Specific Plan language and Mitigated Negative Declaration updated W , w IN IN J!1 HEIPPIRN ■,■ o WHOM NEON Building 2 ��TIII IIII I�IIII1111 Illllf 11111 II y 1111'remm. ��01 m �l��l♦�'ii ii'i1�� Building 3 .,.... ,,,._1R1t��51�}ill]X14,45`1�l\I\11�1119S11�V14VVF1141141��"rY-[-.,.. Building 4 i View on Avenue 50 Of- View on Washington Street Recommendation Adopt a resolution to recommend City Council approve changes, including architectural style change, reduce buildings to two -stories, and remove garages on north side of site, for the La Quinta Village Apartments project consisting of 252 units located at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50. ai,, •^°-.�;,,, ��;;€- CALIFORNIA Ef Traffic • Access off Washington and Avenue 50, with right i n/right out for both • Project will add sidewalks, bike/golf cart lanes on Avenue 50 and Washington Street, extend median Planning Commission Meeting October 10, 2023 PH2 - ZOA2023-1000 Zoning Code Updates Background • Staff periodically reviews the municipal zoning code and proposes amendments to update or clarify standards and for opportunities for development code streamlining and design flexibility • Proposed updates also include changes to Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) regulations to meet State housing law and compliance with Housing Element Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) • 850 sq ft ADU floor area allowed; 1,000 sq ft allowed if more than one bedroom. If primary dwelling is less than 1,600 sq ft. • Construction of ADU shall not constitute a Group R occupancy change, unless Building Official makes a written finding based on substantial evidence that ADU could have a specific, adverse impact on public health and safety. • No parking reqts for ADU that is submitted with permit for new dwelling unit - must satisfy location reqts. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) • ADU allowed in front setback if 800 sq ft ADU cannot be located in any other location on the site w/ four -foot side and rear yard setbacks. • ADU and Junior Accessory Dwelling Unit (JADU) can be combined on one property. ADU has additional standards. • Construction of ADU shall not trigger a requirement for fire sprinklers to be installed in the existing primary dwelling. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) • Application for demo of detached garage to be replaced by application for new ADU shall be reviewed at same time. No noticing required unless property is located within historic district. • Owner occupancy not required within single family residence. Accessory Dwelling Units (ADU) • Director denial of application of ADU must include comments to applicant with a list of items that are defective or deficient and a description of how the application can be remedied. • Application for ADU cannot be denied on the basis of non- conforming zoning conditions, building code violations, or unpermitted structures that do not present a threat to public health and safety and are not affected by the construction of the ADU. Tennis and Other Game Courts • Allow tennis and other game courts (such as pickleball) at existing grade to be set back at least 20 feet from front, 10 feet from side, or rear property lines where a block wall six (6) feet in height exists or is required to be constructed along those property lines. • Current Code requires that tennis and other game courts be set back at least 20 feet from the front property line, 10 feet from the side or rear property lines, and requires that the court be lower in grade by four feet from the surrounding grade if located within 30 feet of any side or rear property line. NOT ALLOWED M NEEDS BLOCK WALL AROUND PROPERTY LINES _ ALLOWED SID FRONT Flagpoles SIDE • Allow flagpoles to be located at least 5 feet from the property line, where the yard abuts open space, a golf course, or a street. • Current Code prohibits flagpoles located on yards that abut another residential lot; this would remain in place. • Current Code allows flagpoles on yards that front a street or open space or a golf course, but with a minimum 10 -foot setback from the property line. OPEN SPACE, GOLF COURSE NOT ALLOWED M F ET SIDE 5 ft OPEN SPACE, GOLF COURSE Garage Setback from Front Yard • Remove the 25 -foot setback requirement for garages; the 20 -foot setback for the building would remain in place. • 25 -foot setback was to account for tilt -up (overhead) garage doors. • Roll -up garage doors are now most common. FP Floodplain District • Remove the work "Overlay" from the Code language that refers to the Floodplain District as a "Floodplain Overlay District". • Floodplain District is a base district, not an overlay district Recommendation • Adopt a resolution recommending that the City Council approve Zoning Ordinance Amendment 2023-1000 and find that these amendments are exempt from CEQA review. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 29 OCTOBER 10, 2023 15 POWERPOINT APPLICANT PRESENTATION PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 2023 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION 1 2 OCTOBER 10, 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS Formerly known as Troutdale Village AMR -- i ■ � `yR 6- Complies with Medium High Density Residential (MHDR) Designation NO Change to Land Use Designation Affordable Housing Overlay (AHO) designation remains Complies with Residential Medium High (RMH) Zoning NO Zone Change 5174 MC '• moi..*: PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION Project Site is slated for 280 Very -Low to Low-income Units by the City of La Quinta General Plan Housing Element Table 1168 Vacant Land Inventory Map Pxisting Pre{ected Projeded Kty APN Acres Eaisting GP yening OelaskY veld Very Low, Low and Moderate Income SIM& 11 6q6-07o-at6 i4.o3 MNUR �RMHAHO xn 28a Proposing to relocate 280 Very -Low to Low-income units closer to Highway 111 Corridor 3 Proposed Site OR siwr�w� t 1 i T* Fr11111�' I I i Project Site yC _ I HWY OL OCTOBER 10, 2023 COMPARISON OF DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Proposed AHO Density 168 Units 252 Units 281-505 Units Maximum Structure Height 28 Feet 28 Feet 40 Feet Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor 22 Feet 28 Feet 22 Feet Maximum Number of Stories 2 Stories 2 Stories 4 Stories Minimum Livable Area 750 SF 670 SF 600 SF Parking Totals 420 Spaces 522 Spaces 330-593 Spaces OCTOBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 4 4 Development Standards RMH Zoning Proposed AHO Density 168 Units 252 Units 281-505 Units Maximum Structure Height 28 Feet 28 Feet 40 Feet Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor 22 Feet 28 Feet 22 Feet Maximum Number of Stories 2 Stories 2 Stories 4 Stories Minimum Livable Area 750 SF 670 SF 600 SF Parking Totals 420 Spaces 522 Spaces 330-593 Spaces 2 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION PARKING Required without Affordable Ratios: • 2 Spaces per Unit • 0.5 Guest Spaces per Unit 252 units x 2 spaces/unit = 504 spaces for units 252 units x 0.5 Guest spaces/unit = 126 spaces for Guests 630 Total Spaces Required OCTOBER 2023 5 Required with Affordable Ratios: • 1 Space per 1 -Bedroom Unit • 1.5 Spaces per 2 -Bedroom Unit • No Guest Spaces Required 1321 -Bed units x 1 space/unit = 132 spaces 120 2 -Bed units x 1.5 spaces/unit = 180 spaces 312 Spaces for Units Required 7 Spaces for Clubhouse 319 Total Spaces Required LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS ELECTRIC VEHICLE PARKING 2022 CalGreen Requirements EV Chargers — Level 2 Chargers Installed 5% x 522 total spaces = 26 Spaces EV Ready — Equipped with Low Power Receptacles 25% x 522 total spaces = 131 Spaces EV Capable - For Future Use 10% x 522 total spaces = 52 Spaces 209 Total EV Spaces Required OCTOBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS I OCTOBER 10, 2023 Parking Provided Ratios: • 1 Space per 1 -Bedroom Unit • 2 Spaces per 2 -Bedroom Unit • 0.5 Guest Spaces per Unit 1321 -Bed units x 1 space/unit = 132 spaces 120 2 -Bed units x 2 spaces/unit = 240 spaces 252 units x 0.56 spaces/unit = 143 spaces for Guests 372 Spaces for Units Provided 7 Spaces for Clubhouse 522 Total Spaces Provided Parking Pass System to regulate parking & visitors 5 6 3 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION LIVABLE AREA Reduction of livable area allowed by the City. Existing developments with units providing less than 750 SF of livable area: Affordable Multi -Family Rentals: o Wolff Waters Place: l Bedroom — 633 SF Market -Rate Multi -Family Rentals: o Silverhawk Apartments:1 Bedroom "The Falls" — 670 SF 1 Bedroom "Aqua Rose' — 743 SF Affordable Senior Living Rentals: o Seasons at La Quinta:1 Bedroom -609 SF o Seasons at Miraflores:1 Bedroom — 700 SF o Hadley Villas:1 Bedroom — 540 SF Average 7 OCTOBER 10, 2023 Wolff Waters Place Proposed La Quinta Village Apts 1 Bedroom Floor Plan 1 Bedroom Floor Plan 633 SF 673 SF M PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION 7;� � �a° aae o�► ao �a ae voa +►+a�► a+►o I ♦� F - (4( Ct a ga r yin F I rrc. i 1 OI I j _ — J, \.. '—PERA IO�V£R/NIN]E95! RCC9fIPPNp ` om mx�81ML'IIIE XIiiI "F6YJFiletl CaU"rt D00 PMK LICIICTAEIW OCTOBER 10, 2023 178 Market -Rate Units 74 Moderate -Income Units I OFF-SITE IMPROVEMENTS MARSHAL SUBSTATION Upgrades to IID Marshal Substation from 25 MVA to 40/50 MVA AVENUE 50 Widening to provide additional traffic lane and bike lane connecting Park Avenue & Washington Street WASHINGTON STREET Dedicated deceleration lane at primary entry, new bus turnout and relocated bus shelter, extending existing median OCTOBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 10 10 5 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION OCTOBER 10, 2023 11 12 C%1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION ❑= New Traffic Lane �= New Bike Lane �= Future Bike Lane ❑= Striping OCTOBER 10, 2023 PALD--500 I 1.•,�� •�:�:I PAD 520 r,wt ai#mraou_ I I Fel I oronw. �.soms I II Aww?! A 13 Additional Vehicle Lane and Bike Lane connecting Park Ave. and Washington St. �= Proposed Bridge �= Raised Median �= Roadway Future raised median to prohibit illegal left turns into Project 14 7 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION 15 ❑= New Deceleration Lane ❑= New Bus Turnout �= Relocated Bus Shelter L�= Extended Existing Median ®� ;--------------"------------ ------------------------- --------- I r r A=ph- r 66 16 OCTOBER 10, 2023 �1 MOM Dedicated Deceleration Lane at Primary Entry Relocated Bus Stop w/ Dedicated Bus Turnout M. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION OCTOBER 10, 2023 17 18 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION OCTOBER 10, 2023 19 20 10 Amenities include Pool & Spa, BBQ Areas, Dog Park, Shaded Tot Lot, Pickleball Court, and Putting Green MR—M 1 1.. Aim PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION OCTOBER 10, 2023 23 4 00 , — ,� 3 -----'-- moi a r Tree line I� . li Ilair o-- y �—reaeroaceE namiowsr � aecertvaxa sate amcn�xm1 1. .. xxc�ucam �_- oonrrpl vaaasa�ara�.rE. • unlWred parking • • north property No garages on-site 24 12 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION AFFORDABLE RENT EXAMPLE MODERATE INCOME UNITS Income levels based on Department of Housing and Community Development Income Limits dated June 6, 2023 OCTOBER 2023 25 EXAMPLE The AMI for a 2 -person household is $75,600. The maximum income to be eligible for moderate -income housing is $90,700. For rental tenants in a 2 -person household, the maximum rent for moderate -income is $2,079 / month for a 1 -Bedroom $2,339 / month for a 2 -Bedroom Annual Income Limit for Moderate ranges from $79,400 - $149,700 Median Income for Moderate ranges from $66,150 - $124,750 *Based on Household Size* Definition: Annual Income— Gross income from all sources for all members of the household LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS OCTOBER 10, 2023 25 W 13 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION OCTOBER 10, 2023 27 Proposed: No Garages Alternate Option: 55 garages N�� ~� Garages to replace some proposed uncovered parking and landscaping 14 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION Proposed: I,I �Pmperty Line Residence No Garages } �.e. on Sagaaro Read 81'-7" _ 33'-8• Iw.s. �. arnaren wxn.m wm I A mAa. I --> - _-----�I e Carport Drive le —Existing CMU 81ock Wall Fence 26 Feet AisMd.Assumes 6'H19h Fencing Alternate Option: Property Line Residence 55 garages on Saguaro Road 81'-7" 33'-8" — __ I mew �a mnoma. wnn aro yam I 11'-11 Ddve Aisle Garage LEAsting CMU Block Wall Fence 26 Feet Wide L—inn2.—1 Visible Assemes6'High Fencing 29 30 OCTOBER 10, 2023 15 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION 31 32 OCTOBER 10, 2023 _ --- g - �r I ie. Tw.eae. me. .... . . . . . . . ..� me.me.e.e.e...m .. _ m�m�mr.mr.m�em .mmmmmmmm�ms ....wo� 0 0 ` ,f \ e MT 0 0 e I � a m � Im m o a� I a I LT+ I I 0 - - -PERTH" 0 — — — vn______----------------------------------------------------- 31 ---------_ --_—_______________________ iwrhnxaaro __-------�rtmitnaxnes+-'. .e�axeo,anc¢ u u..i ixmvercv�rotrucw ..m.. ___ mue ----_—_ � _-----.....mw v�..u�«w.�..Y F wvnw.rere.cxo. nv m. rmroww,rox ¢rue. o. goo tniwrawnrmr� NEEDS AHO DISTRICTACCOMNG CITY'S IINCREASING AND ENHANCIINGIONAL HOUSINOG OPPORTUNITIES Development Standards O Density: MINIMUM 20 units per acre = 281 Units Maximum 36 units per acre = 505 Units O Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor: 22 Feet' (28' w/MUP) O Maximum Structure Height: 40 Feet O Maximum Number of Stories: 4 Stories o Minimum Livable Area: 600 SF O By -Right Parking Incentive applies: 1 space per 1 -Bed, 1.5 spaces per 2 -Bed o No parking allowed in 15 Foot rear setback nor in 10 Foot exterior side yard setback O If approved by City, allows for retention basins within landscape setbacks o Carport Setback: 20 Feet LQMC 9.110.100: Allows rental multifamily residential units By -Right for developments with at least 20% of units affordable to low, very low, and extremely low-income households at a density of at least 20 units per acre and at least 16 units per site. OCTOBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 32 16 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION 33 34 OCTOBER 10, 2023 CITY ZONING ORDINANCE - RMH Development Standards o Density: 8-12 units per acre = 168 Units o Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor: 22 Feet' (28' w/MUP) o Maximum Structure Height: 28 Feet o Maximum Number of Stories: 2 Stories o Minimum Livable Area: 750 SF o Parking: 2 spaces per unit, 0.5 guest spaces per unit o No parking allowed in 15 Foot rear setback nor in 10 Foot exterior side yard setback o If approved by City, allows for retention basins within landscape setbacks o Carport Setback: 20 Feet General Notes: 1. Any proposed building height over 22 feet requires Minor Use Permit and shall not exceed the maximum building height of the existing zoning. For RMH, the maximum building height is 28 feet. OCTOBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 33 LA QUINTA VILLAGE SPECIFIC PLAN Development Standards o Density: 12 units per acre = 168 base units o Density Bonus: 50% (additional 6 units per acre) = 252 total units o Maximum Structure Height at Image Corridor: 28 Feet o Maximum Structure Height: 28 Feet o Maximum Number of Stories: 2 Stories o Minimum Livable Area: 670 SF o By -Right Parking Incentive applies: 1 space per 1 -Bed, 1.5 spaces per 2 -Bed o Allows for parking within setbacks including rear and exterior side yard setbacks o Allows for fencing and retention basin within landscape setbacks o Allows carports within 15 -foot rear building setback OCTOBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 34 17 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION 35 36 OCTOBER 10, 2023 OVERFLOW PARKING What if the Village holds special events for its residents? Where will Village residents and their guests park? Will they be parking in the Sagebrush neighborhood? Drafted Overflow Parking Management Plan to provide strategies to be implemented during special events & holidays Professional Valet Service to park vehicles on-site Proposed off-site parking at Sports Complex and shuttle bus service OCTOBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 35 TRAFFIC STUDY DURING PEAK SEASON APRIL 2023 New traffic study conducted April 2023. Previous study conducted during December 2020. Study Area Intersections Washington / Avenue 50 Washington / Sagebrush Ave. Washington / Eisenhower Dr./Rancho La Quinta Drive Washington / Avenue 48 Avenue 50 / Moon River Dr./Park Ave. Project Trip Generation 1,556 Total Daily Trips 108 AM Peak Hour Trips 125 PM Peak Hour Trips Study Time Periods Weekday AM Hours: 7:OOAM — 9:OOAM Weekday PM Hours: 4:OOPM — 6:OOPM Peak Hours for Analysis per City of LQ Less than significant impact due to study area intersections operating at acceptable Level of Service (LOS) under Project Completion Conditions. Existing deficient operation conditions at Moon River Dr./Park Ave. and Avenue 50 due to AM student drop off for Harry S. Truman Elementary School. No improvements are required. OCTOBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 36 MA PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION 37 38 OCTOBER 10, 2023 WILL SHORT-TERM RENTALS BE ALLOWED? Will units become Airbnbs? Will units sit empty the majority of the year NO Leasing Term Commitment of One Year Minimum Providing local housing for growing full-time community Serving local businesses by reducing travel time from other desert communities OCTOBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 37 WHAT IS AFFORDALE HOUSING? Limits set by California Department of Housing and Community Development based on Federal Limits set by HUD AFFORDABLE LOW-INCOME Different levels of Affordability Above Moderate -income (Market -Rate) Moderate -income Low-income Very Low-income Extremely Low-income Acutely Low-income *Based on Area Median Income (AMI) Definition: Area Median Income— midpoint of a region's income distribution. In a region, half of households earn more than the median and half earn less than the median. This is NOT the average income. $CURCE_NET— .ir W IA QUINTAC AGO v FsmENrsicoC.ue--OURcesiaFFoxaaecF-Nous,111,1co MF-uI'll OCTOBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 38 19 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING - APPLICANT PRESENTATION 39 OCTOBER 10, 2023 2023 RENT LIMITS (MODERATE) LER RIVERSIDE COUNTY A QUINTA HOUSING AUTHORITY Income levels based on Depai-tinent of Housing and Community Development Income Limits dated June 6, 2023 1 -Bedroom 2 -Bedroom Monthly Affordable Rent: $2,079 Monthly Affordable Rent: $2,339 1 Person Household 2 Person Household 3 Person Household Median Income: $66,150 Median Income: $75,600 Median Income: $85,050 Maximum Income: $79,400 Maximum Income: $90,700 Maximum Income: $102,050 Annual Income Limit for Moderate ranges from $79,400 - $149,700 Median Income for Moderate ranges from $66,150 - $124,750 *Based on Household Size* Definition: Annual Income- Gross income from all sources for all members of the household soo*�E. Hrros,nwww_,a a��raoa.�o �iHOMEis�owPue...........r.ri<e<sa OCTOBER 2023 LA QUINTA VILLAGE APARTMENTS 39 40 on WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT La Quinta Village Apartments PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 2023 Tania Flores From: joejagent <joejagent@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2023 6:09 PM To: Planning WebMail Subject: 50th and Washington Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Commissioners: The issues are traffic and public safety. The recent flooding shows that the intersection of 50th and Washinton is not suitable for medium, no less high density residential housing. The floods closed 50th. If 500 people were living there, for a few days they would be trapped and for another week or so limited to an entrance and exit on Washington. The backup in the streets and inside the development would have been tremendous. Until a bridge can be built on 50th, any residential construction should be halted, or else the City could be liable for damages, including possible loss of life. The danger to the students walking to and from school remains a danger, bridge or not. Joseph Johnson 78640 Saguaro Road La Quinta 92253 Please make note of my name and address so the next time notices are sent about a project 50 yards from my property I get one. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone Tania Flores From: Robbie Reddy <robbiereddy1 @gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, October 5, 2023 10:58 PM To: Planning WebMail Subject: Objection to development on 50th and Washington Some people who received this message don't often get email from robbiereddyl@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. To whom it may concern, I am writing to express my objection to any large scale residential development in the vicinity of 50th and Washington. The traffic in season is already extremely congested and noisy. Further development will make traffic and noise unbearable for nearby residents. Please do not let greedy developers spoil our valued communities. Thank you. Robbie Reddy 48112 Via Hermosa La Quinta, CA Tania Flores From: NANCY ALEXANDER <alexander1430@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 9:18 AM To: Tania Flores Subject: WRITTEN COMMENTS - Nancy Alexander - LaQuinta, CA Resident - LQ Village Apartments You don't often get email from alexander1430@comcast.net. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear LQ Planning Commission, I am writing to once again share my opposition to the LQ Village Apartments on the corner of Washington & 50th. I see the plans have changed to 2 stories, but all that does is "stuff' more buildings onto the property. It is still a very high density project. The same issues are there: traffic patterns, safety concerns at U-turn at Avenue 50 & Moon River Drive, entrances requiring a key card would stack traffic up on busy roads, no elevators (not ADA approved), no storage units for potential residents to store their belongings, safety issues with school children walking to and from school along the already congested road. It doesn't fit into the already existing neighborhood communities. There is a perfect plot of land north of Hwy 111 and Fred Waring Drive that would be a better fit for a project this size. Respectfully, Nancy Alexander Tania Flores From: Nkaya Brandon <nkayabrandon@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 11:29 AM To: Planning WebMail Subject: PIs VOTE NO!!! HIGHLY OBJECT to 50th& Washington development Some people who received this message don't often get email from nkayabrandon@yahoo.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Planning Commission, PLEASE VOTE NO tonight!!! My husband and I HIGHLY OBJECT to the development proposal to 50th and Washington. We have been to ALL the Planning meetings and the City Council meetings in regards to this property. We live down the street on 50th and travel on 50th and Washington daily at different hours of the day. We can not imagine a safe solution, (based in reality) to that corner for traffic. 1) At the last City Council meeting where this project was discussed from Spm -11 pm, just before 11pm when the City Council decided to give it back to Planning, they STRONGLY suggested including the community with a open presentation BEFORE it went to a Planning meeting. I have been monitoring all City and Planning meetings and get the email notices of upcoming meetings. I also am an active resident on our local Nextdoor.com and all neighbors I have been in contact with also say there has been NO notice of any such community presentation ahead of your meeting tonight. IF the developer did hold a presentation, no locals who were very interested heard, knew about it or when/where/if it even happened. IF it did happen, where was it posted and how is the community to find that out? 2) Including ALL the previously discussed reasons at past meetings to VOTE NO regarding traffic, U-turn safety, VERY high density issues on too small a plot of land, impact to our view corridor into our great town, design issues and ....... We SERIOUSLY hope that the Planning Commission will ALSO be VERY CONCERNED about and addressing what the community impact has been and that those of us who live here have gone through during and after the last 2 months after the 2 rainfall storms in August and September! Those were major flooding issues and a new 'lake' that formed off Washington and 50th that impacted the area tremendously. This high density project is RIGHT next to that flood channel and its main roadways were flooded out and closed for long times. That development community would have been isolated and stranded during the height of both storms and until at least Washington was re -opened from being flooded. For those of us that live and commute daily on 50th and Washington Avenues, for a very long time after both the storms and consequent flooding, we have had to be detoured around for extended times as the aftermath and cleanup from the flooding got done. The City handled it excellently for the summer density that was here. However, even with the lower population in summertime, early fall, we were all getting caught up daily in the overburdened areas, the already too heavy extra school traffic at Moon River since that is the detour to Tampico back to Washington. The community is already FULL, especially with the loss of 50th Ave connection to Washington for several weeks closure. Adding the HUGE density that this developer is proposing to an area where we have and long, necessary closures of 50th at Washington when it rains, and right next to a flood channel where the REALITY of when a Bridge Plan will ACTUALLY be done and completed consider the reality of the Dunes Palms project timeline)... seems ludicrous. The rains were very informative of what occurs at the corner of 50th and Washington and the huge impact it has had on the already existing community for many, many weeks! 3) The housing development will be EXTREMELY close to the playing field across the wash where they have the massive stadium lights on at night very often. Has anyone taken that into account - having stadium lights in people's 2 story apartments and bedrooms? They will be higher up than a single story where the roof and pergolas help shield some of the glaring lights. Has the developer or Planning Commission driven by on the many evenings when there are school practices, games, events and really looked at what it would be like to live right next to it on a 2nd (or 3rd) story building? Not ideal... 4) Fully understanding that this is all a proposal process between the developer and our great city, we feel that the developer did not do their due diligence, their homework, ahead of the even the 1st Planning Commission as to what our La Quinta style is and what would work best for the community. Instead they have taken up several Planning Commission meetings with their views and needs for community that were SO far off, and then to City Council meeting with the community and now back to take up Planning Commission meeting with the community. It seems like at the 11th hour - literally just before 11 pm (since 5 or 6 pm) at each meeting the developer teases a possibility again that could have been taken into consideration way back and presented several meetings back if they were really, seriously considering the community and respecting our Commissioners, Council members and community. Had the developer been really seriously considering the community, the notice of any community presentations would have been advertised far and wide for the community to attend and be a part of what they are planning. This did not happen, even for the people who live nearby where the impact would be huge. 5) Btw, I believe I saw on one of the developer's slides that was presented for that their updated traffic study that in small print that it was done at lam..... That is not a time frame that is indicative of traffic patterns during the day for 50th and Washington. They have a good project for Washington and Fred Waring huge open lot where there is more land and MUCH more access to amenities for their density. Squeezing that many buildings, apartments, population density onto too small a lot next to long time single home communities on a view corridor to our La Quinta Gem is a NO VOTE! It's not a safe nor smart project for that corner for So many reasons, no matter how'Spanish Colonial' design they make it. The design is a major factor for sure, but for all the above reasons and all the concerns the Planning Commission already has and now even more so with the flooding and detours and the impact it's had on the community - VOTE NO PLEASE! ! !! Thank you, Carolyn Brandon & Charles Ciup 50240 Woodmere La Quinta 92253 (805) 338-7372 Tania Flores From: Duna La Quinta Board of Directors <dunahoa@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 8:18 AM To: Tania Flores Cc: PAT & JANICE MC COY, TRUSTEES; David Schuknecht; Jeff Gunn; Steven Gardner; d cox; Keith Meyer; Lawrence Van Pelt Subject: Review of La Quinta Village (formerly Troutdale Village) APN 646-070-016 Attachments: Letter to LQPC RE La Quinta Village 9.09.pdf EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Ms. Flores, Please kindly find comments on the above project for distribution to the Planning Commission at today's meeting. Many thanks for your hard work! Keith Meyer DUNA LA QUINTA HOA DUNAi'�''� � U,untw Homeowners Association October 9, 2023 Tania Flores, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta Planning Commission 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Review of La Quinta Village (formerly Troutdale Village) GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2022-0002 SPECIFIC PLAN 2022-0001 (SP 2004-071, AMENDMENT 2) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2022-0001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2022-0001Site Plan APN 646-070-016 Dear Ms. Flores and Members of the Planning Commission; dunahoa@gmail.com We are the Presidents of the Board of Directors for Duna La Quinta HOA No. 1, and Villa Vista HOA, which are located on the south side of Avenue 50 between Washington Street and Eisenhower Blvd. Duna La Quinta is a medium-high density development and includes three HOAs, totaling 184 single family and condominium units. We appreciate the steps the developer has taken to reduce building height and change architecture style for the La Quinta Village Apartment project. We support these changes. However, we remained very concerned about the access design, due to project's location, poor site access from Washington Street and Avenue 50, turning traffic and resultant safety impacts, We have reviewed the environmental document, supporting reports and revised site plan for the proposed project and has the following comments on the developer's proposal: 1. ACCESS This site is not a good location for such a large housing project that generates 1,600 trips per day, as the access points are too close to the Washington/50th intersection. How does a resident get into this development from Washington Street coming from the north? They can't make a left turn into the development from southbound Washington, and they can't make a left turn in from westbound Avenue 50. So, it means that 100% of the traffic coming from the north would need to make a U-turn at Avenue 50, however, this is not possible since U-turns are prohibited in the southbound direction. Another possibility is that traffic would go to the Ave. 50/Park Avenue intersection, make a U-turn, thus severely impacting school safety. This lack of adequate access will create great driver frustration and encourage unsafe and illegal movements. The Traffic Report estimates that 60% of the traffic would go to/come from Washington Street north. Since no access is available to southbound Washington traffic, all this traffic would need to divert to either Eisenhower Blvd. or to Jefferson Street. Page 1 of 3 DUNAi'�''� � U,untw Homeowners Association dunahoa@gmail.com This unavailability of access from the north invalidates one of the main assumptions of the traffic report, thus rendering the traffic report and environmental document inaccurate. It should also be noted that the traffic report does not consider pedestrian safety or ped signal activations at any study intersection. rnraQ �ra� •_r'a r�- The simple solution to this problem is to move the development's entry point on Washington Street to the furthest point north possible, break the Washington Street median and provide a deceleration lane and left -turn -in pocket so southbound traffic doesn't need to make an illegal U-turn at the Avenue 50 intersection. (this has been done in other locations on Washington Street). It will also have the benefit of eliminating U-turns on Ave. 50 at Park Avenue. See the illustration below: L-1 LIJ 16 . . - i Page 2 of 3 DUNA '� a(ltdttw Homeowners Association dunahoa@gmail.com CLOSING We urge the City of La Quinta to reject this project's access design in its current configuration and require the developer to make the proper access improvements along Washington Street. We also request the city to revise the traffic study so that it accurately reflects the allowable movements into the project. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments. Sincerely Keith G. Meyer, PE, President, Duna La Quinta HOA No.1 Lawrence Van Pelt, President, Villa Vista HOA La Quinta, CA Page 3 of 3 Tania Flores From: Joe Hager <joehager119@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 10:59 AM To: Tania Flores Subject: Written Comments - LaQuinta Village Apartments EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear La Quinta Planning Commission Members, I am writing to you to express my concerns regarding the apartment complex project proposed at 50th and Washington called La Quinta Village Apartments and our opposition to the project. My name is Joe Hager. My wife and I own a house in Duna La Quinta, which is directly across the intersection for the proposed high density development. We strongly oppose this development for the following reasons: 1. A proven fact: the higher the population density, the higher the crime rate; the higher the single-family land use, the lower the crime rate; and the higher the percentage of multifamily land -use, and the higher the crime rate, including higher rates of robbery, aggravated assault and rape. * From the study, titled "Land Use and Violent Crime," published in the November 2009 issue of the journal Criminology. There are currently numerous school children that walk through that intersection on their way to and from school. They will be at a much higher risk of kidnapping, assaults and rape due to this development. • Those children will also have increased risks of serious injury or worse from the increased traffic at that intersection and the entrances/exits of this proposed development. • There is also a proven relationship between home ownership and crime. This is true of both violent and property crime. The bottom 25 states in homeownership have violent crime rates that are 17.43 percent higher than in the top 25 states for homeownership. Property crime rates in low homeownership states are 6.31 percent higher than in high homeownership states 2. Higher density areas repel single-family homeowners. Homeowners prefer to be next to single-family homes rather than apartments. Thus, this development, at this location, will decrease the attractiveness of our adjacent single-family neighborhoods, and potentially decrease our property values. higher crime rates drive down demand, which causes prices to fall in response 3. Increased density decreases neighborhood personal interactions, involvement and changes behaviors. One of the main reasons we were attracted to this area of Palm Springs was Old Town LaQuinta: it has the intimacy of the small town with its surrounding neighborhoods. As we go for morning walks or walk to dinner in Old Town, we meet numerous other similar, friendly homeowners, which fosters connections. More homeowners in a neighborhood results in more civic engagement and personal investment The proposed development, at this location, will negatively affect the friendliness and social interactions of our neighborhoods, including Old Town LaQuinta. • This will be the result of the increased transience and turnover of residents from the high density development, at that location. 4. Traffic flow and intersection safety The entrance to this development off of Washington will result in numerous unsafe u -turns at the intersection of Washington and 50th, resulting in more accidents and endangerment to pedestrians crossing that intersection. Plus, the slowing and turning of traffic entering the development from Washington or 50th will potentially result in more accidents and safety hazards. When there is a green light at that intersection for the Washington traffic, cars and trucks are moving at speeds up to 50 mph. These fast moving vehicles will collide with the slowing vehicles attempting to enter the development off of Washington. 5. A high density development with multi -storied apartment buildings would be out of place and not fit in with the adjacent neighborhoods, even with the latest proposed architectural modifications of only 2 -story buildinas. This location is surrounded by small neighborhoods of single- family houses and should remain that way. This intersection and Washington Ave is one of the main entrance points to our quaint Old Town LaQuinta, thus changing the Old Town feeling and historical ambience of our city. I strongly recommend that a different location is selected for this type of high density development to prevent the occurence of the above facts and issues. We do NOT support this development proposal nor the proposed amendments to the general plan, variances to the zoning nor the site development plan as proposed. 1) Please, do not approve the waiver to the current zoning. 2) Please, do not amend the general plan. This process was completed with analysis and community input. 3) Please, do not permit this project. VOTE NO Sincerely, Joe Hager 78274 Calle Las Ramblas LaQuinta [J� IReplyReply allForward 0 Tania Flores From: Todd Hopkins <thopkins@hopconsult.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 11:13 AM To: Tania Flores Subject: Troutdale project / 50th and Washington You don't often get email from thopkins@hopconsult.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Good morning, This letter is a follow-up to our previous concerns regarding the project meeting this evening on Avenue 50 and Washington. It seems as though there weren't any significant modifications made to the proposed development plan for the Troutdale project. We are concerned about the density of the project, noise and traffic pollution from the development. Also given the recent ferocity of storms and lack of drainage, less open land will inevitably contribute to increased flooding in the surrounding areas. We are opposed to the development plan presented. We wish to object to the plan. Many thanks, Todd Hopkins and Gina Calhoun Hopkins Consult Todd Hopkins Partner 49537 Avenida Montero La Quinta, CA, 92253 Mobile 415.637.5810 thopkins@hopconsult.com Tania Flores From: S. R. <sandy@sandyrobbins.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 11:45 AM To: Planning WebMail; Tania Flores Subject: Letter for Planning Commission Meeting 10/10/2023 Attachments: Letter Planning Commission 10-10-2023.pdf Some people who received this message don't often get email from sandy@sandyrobbins.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Attached is my letter regarding La Quinta Village Apartments for the members of the Planning Commission. This message and any attachments may contain confidential or privileged information and are only for the use of the intended recipient of this message. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by return email, and delete or destroy this and all copies of this message and all attachments. Any unauthorized disclosure, use, distribution, or reproduction of this message or any attachments is prohibited and may be unlawful. October 9, 2023 Dear Ms. Flores and Members of the Planning Commission; I am writing to you today regarding the proposed development of La Quinta Village apartments (formerly Troutdale Apartments). I have several significant concerns regarding this project in the proposed location of Washington/50th. 1. The project only has seven guest parking spots. The neighboring homes on Saguaro Road, Bottlebrush Drive, Date Palm, and Sagebrush Avenue will be significantly impacted by visitors visiting their friends and family and potentially overflowing parking from residents. The adjacent homes on Saguaro Road, Bottlebrush Drive, Date Palm, and Sagebrush Avenue should not have to endure the burden of the overflow parking from the proposed La Quinta Village apartments, nor should the neighboring homes have to get a parking permit from the City of La Quinta to be able to park in front of their own home. The project should be designed with adequate guest parking. The Developer should eliminate their outdoor recreational areas or cut back on the number of units being built and provide more guest parking for the development. 2. The ingress and egress off of Washington is an inferior access for the proposed project. Cars traveling south on Washington will have to make a U-turn or go completely around on 481h to Jefferson to 50 then back to Washington since there is a no U-turn sign at Washington/50th. This will cause a tremendous traffic backup during school traffic hours on 50th 3. The Traffic study was completed in April 2023. The traffic study was not conducted during the busiest time of the season. Most snowbirds go home after the winter season is over on April 1 of each year. The new traffic will not reflect the accuracy of how many cars travel Washington and 50th daily. The new traffic study should be made available to the public 72 hours before the Planning or City Counsil meeting tomorrow. As I write this letter to you, the new traffic study is unavailable on the Developer's website. The Developer's website is currently down and not working. 4. Environmental report and assessment - The proposed development is adding approximately over 1500 car daily traffic patterns and the environment. Has a new study and assessment been completed to see the impact of the air and noise on neighboring homes? A new study should be completed since the project has changed. 5. The neighboring homes on Saguaro Road have to look at the l Oft wall from their backyards. There is nothing aesthetically pleasing about looking at a blank wall of nothing. 6. Water - How does the City of La Quinta plan to handle the new contract between the State of California and the Fed's to reduce the amount of water the State of California receives from the Colorado River with this new development? 7. The current power grid cannot handle the new development and will require an upgrade. At who's expense? This project is adverse development for the surrounding homes and schools, including resale value, traffic, safety for bicyclists and pedestrians, and environmental impacts. This property would be better suited for one story senior development, or single-family homes would be a better fit for this property. Thank you for your time in reviewing my letter and concerns. Yours truly, Sandy Robbins 2 Tania Flores From: Kelly Scannell <kellyscannell1 @gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 10:55 AM To: Tania Flores Cc: bob Subject: Fwd: Troutdale Residences written comments You don't often get email from kellyscannelll@gmail.com. Learn why this is important EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Dear Tania, My husband, Bob, and I live in Montero Estates, the neighborhood in La Quinta directly across the street on Washington for the proposed Troutdale project. We have listened to the previous public hearings and still have some serious concerns with the project as proposed. We are still concerned about the following: 1. Density for that property 2. Traffic with only one lane on 50th Ave and only one entrance on Washington. 3. Noise for the increase in traffic and for the addition of so many homes 4. The design is nothing like anything else on Washington after you cross Hwy 111 5. Where will excess parking be for visitors to the apartments We realize that they have modified the plan but we do not feel that neighbor concerns have been adequately addressed. Given the recent flooding on Washington and 50th after the hurricane, we are VERY concerned about the addition of traffic in that area and the impact that a dense project will have on potential future floods. In addition, please consider the impact on the Montero community in the new traffic study. We exit out the gate on Washington and make a u -turn on Sagebrush. The addition of hundreds of cars will make crossing multiple lanes dangerous. The alternative is to go back down to 50th to make a u -turn which will only add to the potential increased congestion from the new residences Thank you for taking our concerns into consideration. Kelly and Bob Scannell Sent from my iPad Kelly Scannell Scannell Scholars Admissions Consulting kellyscannelll@gmail.com 415-990-0130 WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT 2023 Code Updates PLANNING COMMISSION OCTOBER 10, 2023 Tania Flores From: Steve Grocott <SteveG@HeatandControl.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2023 12:23 PM To: Tania Flores Cc: Jennifer Nelson Subject: city manager / Flagpole Issue / Attachments: city manager.docx; flag pic jpg; IMG_3977.MOV; flag2 pic jpg EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hi Miss Flores, This is a past letter that had been sent to Jon McMillen some months ago concerning an ongoing flagpole issue we have here in Andalusia Country Club, La Quinta. The planning commission is looking at a revision in tonight's commission meeting in which we are opposing here by a number of residents. Attached are some pictures of this flagpole from our living room, bedroom (video) and patio area. Please distribute to the commission as needed. Please confirm that you have received this E mail. Thank you for your help Steve Grocott 6/13/23 Flagpole Issue Morning Mr. McMillen, My name is Steve Grocott and I was in City Hall yesterday checking with Officer Woods for an update on the ongoing flagpole issue going on in the Andalusia community. I would like to provide some history and some perspective from my side on this issue. There have been 3 fifteen -foot lighted flagpoles put up in Andalusia and all of them have been disputed by neighbors impacted. Let me be clear, I am not against the American flag only the 15' flagpole that sits on these small lots that can be seen up and down the property lines and across fairways. In my case which is the most egregious, my neighbor Sam Dickerson (58218 Aracena) , installed a flagpole that is 18" from my property line and stands in front of our living room and bedroom and looms over our patio. When the wind blows his 5' flag flies over our palm trees and property line. This flagpole is lighted at night and affects our everyday life every time we look out at our once pristine view. Sam positioned his pole in the far right corner of his property 120 feet away from his front room viewing area and it is now 30' from our front room sliding window. He comes out in the evening sits and takes a look at the flag and then back into his house. It is in our view 24/7. 1 am sure his wife did not want this flagpole in view from their living room. We bought into La Quinta for the beautiful views of the mountains and golf course and now it is impacted greatly by a shiny metal pole that changes this view into the look of an industrial park. My wife and family are distraught over this happening and have been dealing with this over 2'h months now. Our HOA made mistakes in the beginning of this process and they know it just looking at the reaction when they came over and saw the flagpole first hand from our vantage point. Everybody, including friends and neighbors, Officer Woods and our realtor all had the same reaction on how this pole location could be approved by the HOA. Per our realtor this will also affect our property value. When I pushed back on this flagpole the HOA initially told me the city did not have any jurisdiction on these matters. The HOA rules and regulations (2004) are poorly written with no setbacks, flag sizes or specific parameters. The HOA did NO due diligence when granting this location and now they are letting the city enforce something they should have while avoiding their own liability. I have moved forward looking at what my legal options are toward the HOA working with Dave Baron and Bruce Bauer of SBEMP on possible property value damages. I pursued and asked your Code and Compliance department about this issue and found out they do have jurisdiction and they came out promptly to inspect and confirm what I was stating. They started the compliance process and moved forward. Your C&C department has been great but it worries me that this matter is still under some type of review. As I stated, this flagpole is impacting us 24/7 and Sam should not be granted anymore delays or any type of variance. From my understanding no permits have been taken out to this point and the flagpole is still standing in front of us. The flagpole should be taken down before any permit is granted and the city should do a thorough review of any new location. The 10 foot setbacks would put the lighted pole next to his pool and still in line with our bedroom window. I would implore the city to have him move the pole closer to his house to take it away from his pool and out of our bedroom viewing area. (As a side note, all flags should be deemed by the HOA to be attached to the house to avoid all these flagpole issues) Please let us know what is going on moving forward and if you have any questions from my end please feel free to call or Email me. You are also welcome to come by and see this flagpole firsthand from our living room and bedroom windows to see what we see. Thank you for your time and enjoy your weekend Steve Grocott 650-867-1306