Loading...
Appendix K.1 - Noise StudyCORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT DRAFT EIR SCH# 2021020310 TECHNICAL APPENDICES Noise Study Appendix K.1 June 2021 L' J i�► URBAI%1 CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS CITY OF LA QUINTA PREPARED BY: Bill Lawson, PE, INCE blawson@urbanxroads.com (949) 336-5979 MARCH 17, 2021 12642-10 Noise Study Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 12642-10 Noise Study `�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS III APPENDICES IV LIST OF EXHIBITS V LIST OF TABLES V LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Off -Site Traffic Noise Analysis 1 On -Site Traffic Noise Analysis 1 Operational Noise Analysis 2 Construction Noise Analysis 2 Construction Vibration Analysis 3 Summary of CEQA Significance Findings 3 1 INTRODUCTION 7 1.1 Site Location 7 1.2 Project Description 7 2 FUNDAMENTALS 3 2.1 Range of Noise 3 2.2 Noise Descriptors 4 2.3 Sound Propagation 4 2.4 Noise Control 5 2.5 Noise Barrier Attenuation 5 2.6 Land Use Compatibility With Noise 5 2.7 Community Response to Noise 6 2.8 Exposure to High Noise Levels 7 2.9 Vibration 7 3 REGULATORY SETTING 11 3.1 State of California Noise Requirements 11 3.2 State of California Building Code 11 3.3 City of La Quinta General Plan Environmental Hazards Element 11 3.4 Operational Noise Standards 14 3.5 Construction Noise Standards 14 3.6 Construction Vibration Standards 15 4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA 17 4.1 CEQA Guidelines Not Further Analyzed 17 4.2 Noise -Sensitive Receivers 17 4.3 Significance Criteria Summary 18 5 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS 21 5.1 Measurement Procedure and Criteria 21 5.2 Noise Measurement Locations 21 5.3 Noise Measurement Results 22 6 METHODS AND PROCEDURES 27 6.1 FHWA Traffic Noise Prediction Model 27 12642-10 Noise Study `�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 6.2 Vibration Assessment 33 7 OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION NOISE IMPACTS 35 7.1 Traffic Noise Contours 36 7.2 Existing Conditions Project Traffic Noise Level Increase 51 7.3 EA Project Traffic Noise Level Increase 53 7.4 EAC 2021 Project Traffic Noise Level Increase 55 7.5 EAC 2023 Project Traffic Noise Level Increase 57 7.6 EAC 2026 Project Traffic Noise Level Increase 59 7.7 EAC 2026 Project Special Events Traffic Noise Level Increase 61 7.8 General Plan 2040 Project Traffic Noise Level Increase 63 8 ON-SITE TRANSPORTATION NOISE IMPACTS 65 8.1 Exterior Noise Analysis 65 8.2 Interior Noise Analysis 66 9 SENSITIVE RECEIVER LOCATIONS 69 10 OPERATIONAL NOISE IMPACTS 73 10.1 Reference Noise Levels 73 10.2 CadnaA Noise Prediction Model 76 10.3 Project Operational Noise Levels 77 10.4 Project Operational Noise Level Compliance 78 10.4 Project Operational Noise Level Increase 79 11 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS 81 11.1 Construction Noise Levels 81 11.2 Construction Reference Noise Levels 81 11.3 Construction Noise Analysis 83 11.4 Construction Noise Level Compliance 85 11.5 Construction Vibration Impacts 85 12 REFERENCES 87 13 CERTIFICATION 89 APPENDICES APPENDIX 3.1: CITY OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE APPENDIX 5.1: STUDY AREA PHOTOS APPENDIX 5.2: NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENT WORKSHEETS APPENDIX 7.1: OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CONTOURS APPENDIX 8.1: ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS APPENDIX 10.1: CADNAA OPERATIONAL NOISE MODEL INPUTS APPENDIX 11.1: CADNAA CONSTRUCTION NOISE MODEL INPUTS 12642-10 Noise Study iv `�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT ES -A: SUMMARY OF ON-SITE RECOMMENDATIONS 5 EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP 8 EXHIBIT 1-B: PRELIMINARY LAND USE PLAN 1 EXHIBIT 2-A: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS 3 EXHIBIT 2-B: NOISE LEVEL INCREASE PERCEPTION 6 EXHIBIT 2-C: TYPICAL LEVELS OF GROUND -BORNE VIBRATION 9 EXHIBIT 3-A: LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS 13 EXHIBIT 5-A: NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS 25 EXHIBIT 9-A: RECEIVER LOCATIONS 71 EXHIBIT 10-A: OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCE AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS 74 EXHIBIT 11-A: CONSTRUCTION NOISE SOURCE AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS 82 LIST OF TABLES TABLE ES -1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS 4 TABLE 3-1: OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS 14 TABLE 4-1: SIGNIFICANCE OF NOISE IMPACTS AT NOISE -SENSITIVE RECEIVERS 18 TABLE 4-2: SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY 19 TABLE 5-1: 24-HOUR AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS 24 TABLE 6-1: OFF-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS 29 TABLE 6-2: AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES 30 TABLE 6-3: TIME OF DAY VEHICLE SPLITS 32 TABLE 6-4: DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW BY VEHICLE TYPE (VEHICLE MIX) 32 TABLE 6-5: ON-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS 32 TABLE 6-6: VIBRATION SOURCE LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT 33 TABLE 7-1: EXISTING 2019 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 37 TABLE 7-2: EXISTING 2019 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 38 TABLE 7-3: EA WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 39 TABLE 7-4: EA WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 40 TABLE 7-5: EAC 2021 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 41 TABLE 7-6: EAC 2021 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 42 TABLE 7-7: EAC 2023 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 43 TABLE 7-8: EAC 2023 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 44 TABLE 7-9: EAC 2026 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 45 TABLE 7-10: EAC 2026 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 46 TABLE 7-11: EAC 2026 WITHOUT PROJECT WITHOUT SPECIAL EVENTS NOISE CONTOURS 47 TABLE 7-12: EAC 2026 WITH PROJECT WITH SPECIAL EVENTS NOISE CONTOURS 48 TABLE 7-13: GENERAL PLAN 2040 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 49 TABLE 7-14: GENERAL PLAN 2040 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 50 TABLE 7-15: EXISTING 2019 OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS 52 TABLE 7-16: EA OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS 54 TABLE 7-17: EAC 2021 OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS 56 TABLE 7-18: EAC 2023 OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS 58 TABLE 7-19: EAC 2026 OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS 60 12642-10 Noise Study V Lam► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-20: EAC 2026 SPECIAL EVENT OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS 62 TABLE 7-21: GENERAL PLAN 2040 OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS 64 TABLE 8-1: EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS 65 TABLE 8-2: EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS WITH NOISE ABATEMENT MEASURES 66 TABLE 8-3: INTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (CNEL) 67 TABLE 10-1: REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS 76 TABLE 10-2: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS 77 TABLE 10-3: OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE 78 TABLE 10-4: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES 79 TABLE 11-1: CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS 83 TABLE 11-2: PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY 84 TABLE 11-3: PHASE 2 & 3 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY 84 TABLE 11-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VIBRATION LEVELS 86 LIST OF ABBREVIATED TERMS (1) Reference ADT Average Daily Traffic ANSI American National Standards Institute Calveno California Vehicle Noise CEQA California Environmental Quality Act CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level dBA A -weighted decibels FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration INCE Institute of Noise Control Engineering Leg Equivalent continuous (average) sound level Lmax Maximum level measured over the time interval Lmin Minimum level measured over the time interval mph Miles per hour PPV Peak Particle Velocity Project Coral Mountain Specific Plan REMEL Reference Energy Mean Emission Level RMS Root -mean -square VdB Vibration Decibels 12642-10 Noise Study vi Lam► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Urban Crossroads, Inc. has prepared this noise study to determine the noise exposure and the necessary noise mitigation measures for the proposed Coral Mountain Specific Plan development ("Project"). The Project site is located on the southwest corner of re -aligned Madison Street at 58th Avenue in the City of La Quinta. The Project is proposed to consist a master planned themed resort comprised of a recreational pool (wave basin), a 150 -key hotel, 104 attached dwelling units, 496 detached dwelling units, 60,000 square feet of retail. The wave basin is a private facility. This study has been prepared consistent with applicable City of La Quinta noise standards, and significance criteria based on guidance provided by Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (1) OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS Traffic generated by the operation of the proposed Project will influence the traffic noise levels in surrounding off-site areas. To quantify the traffic noise increases on the surrounding off-site areas, the changes in traffic noise levels on 29 roadway segments surrounding the Project site were calculated based on the change in the average daily traffic (ADT) volumes. The traffic noise levels provided in this analysis are based on the traffic forecasts found in Coral Mountain Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis. (2) Based on the significance criteria in outlined in Section 4, the Project -related noise level increases are considered potentially significant under Existing with Project conditions at the following two roadway segments: • Madison Street north of Avenue 58 (Segment 8) • Avenue 60 west of Madison Street (Segment 27) All other roadway segments are shown to experience less than significant noise level impacts under Existing plus Project conditions. However, this scenario is provided solely for analytical purposes and will not occur, since the Project will not be full developed (Phase 1, 2 & 3) and occupied under Existing 2019 conditions. Therefore, no mitigation measures are considered to reduce the Existing with Project condition traffic noise level increases, and impacts are considered less than significant since they will not actually occur. The analysis shows that the unmitigated Project -related traffic noise level increases under all traffic scenarios will be less than significant. ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS An on-site exterior noise analysis has been completed to determine the traffic noise exposure and to identify potential necessary noise abatement measures for the proposed Coral Mountain Specific Plan Project. It is expected that the primary source of noise activity to the Project site will be traffic noise from Avenue 58 and Madison Street. EXTERIOR NOISE To satisfy the City of La Quinta 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standards for residential land use, the construction of 6 -foot -high noise barriers is required for the low-density residential 12642-10 Noise Study 1 [,1 URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis development within Planning Area II. With the recommended noise barriers shown on Exhibit ES -A, the future exterior noise levels at the outdoor living areas (backyards) of single-family residential uses in Planning Areas II will be reduced to less than 65.0 dBA CNEL. This noise analysis shows that the recommended 6 -foot -high noise barriers will satisfy the City of La Quinta 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standards for single-family residential use. Therefore, future on-site exterior traffic noise levels will be less than significant. INTERIOR NOISE The interior noise level analysis shows that the City of La Quinta 45 dBA CNEL residential interior noise standards can be satisfied using standard building construction, a windows -closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning) and standard windows with STC ratings of 27 for all lots/units. Therefore, the future on-site interior traffic noise levels will be less than significant. OPERATIONAL NOISE ANALYSIS Using reference noise levels to represent the expected noise sources from the Coral Mountain Specific Plan site, this analysis estimates the Project -related stationary -source noise levels at nearby sensitive receiver locations. The normal activities associated with the proposed Coral Mountain Specific Plan are anticipated to include wave basin/wave machine activity, outdoor pool/spa activity, outdoor activity, and neighborhood commercial land use activity. The operational noise analysis shows that the Project -related stationary -source noise levels at the nearby sensitive receiver locations will satisfy the City of La Quinta daytime exterior noise level standards, with no planned nighttime activities. Therefore, the operational noise impacts are considered less than significant at all existing off-site receiver locations. Further, this analysis demonstrates that the Project will contribute a less than significant long-term unmitigated operational noise level increase to the existing daytime ambient noise environment at all existing off-site receiver locations. CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS Construction -related noise impacts are expected to create temporary and intermittent high-level noise conditions at receivers surrounding the Project site. Using sample reference noise levels to represent the planned construction activities of the Coral Mountain Specific Plan site, this analysis estimates the Project -related construction noise levels at nearby sensitive receiver locations. Since the City of La Quinta General Plan and Municipal Codes do not identify specific construction noise level thresholds, a threshold is identified based on the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) limits for construction noise. The Project Phase 1 construction noise levels are expected to range from 58.0 to 76.5 dBA Leq at the nearby receiver locations. The Project Phase 2 and Phase 3 construction noise levels are expected to range from 63.7 to 75.8 dBA. The construction noise analysis shows that the nearby receiver locations will satisfy the 85 dBA Leq significance threshold during Project construction activities. Therefore, the 12642-10 Noise Study 2 [,1 URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis noise impacts due to Project construction noise is considered less than significant at all receiver locations. Though construction noise and vibration are temporary, intermittent and of short duration, and will not present any long-term impacts, the following mitigation measures would reduce noise and vibration levels produced by construction equipment to nearby noise -sensitive uses. Temporary construction -related noise and vibration impacts will be further reduced with the incorporation of the following measures: • Prior to approval of grading plans and/or issuance of building permits, plans shall include a note indicating that Project construction activities shall comply with the City of La Quinta Municipal Code requirements. • During all Project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receptors nearest the Project site. • The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the Project site during all Project construction (i.e., to the center). • The contractor shall design delivery routes to minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck -related noise. CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION ANALYSIS Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures and soil type. It is expected that ground -borne vibration from Project construction activities would cause only intermittent, localized intrusion. This analysis shows the highest construction vibration levels are expected to range from 0.000 to 0.009 in/sec RMS, which is below the vibration standard of 0.01 in/sec RMS at all receiver locations. Therefore, based on the results of this analysis, all nearby sensitive receiver locations will experience Tess than significant impacts due to Project construction noise levels. SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS The results of this Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis are summarized below based on the significance criteria in Section 4 of this report consistent with Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (1). Table ES -1 shows the findings of significance for each potential noise and/or vibration impact under CEQA before and after any required mitigation measures described below. 12642-10 Noise Study 3 [,► URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE ES -1: SUMMARY OF CEQA SIGNIFICANCE FINDINGS Analysis Report Section Significance Findings Unmitigated Mitigated Off -Site Traffic Noise 7 Less Than Significant - On -Site Traffic Noise 8 Less Than Significant - Operational Noise 10 Less Than Significant - Construction Noise 11 Less Than Significant - Construction Vibration Less Than Significant - 12642-10 Noise Study 4 `�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis EXHIBIT ES -A: SUMMARY OF ON-SITE RECOMMENDATIONS Planning ltetghL5c Commie Planning Area ll \'T '-T Future Low Density Reridential (3) Planning Areall Low.Densily Residential (I] Planning Area II POP.. Low DensRy Residential (2] Planning Area II Felin Low Density Residential (A/ L� I —11 Planning Area IV Open space • RT:''»L 11 /Pta utngA80 III -k at{{5]\ \Plooning-Area III R'sarf (2] Planning dren II Furor Low Density Re idential (5) Planning A e 111 Resort (6) h: LEGEND: 6' Recommended Noise Barrier Height {in feet) Recommended Noise Barrier 12642-10 Noise Study 5 11112°) CROSSROADS URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 6 `�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 1 INTRODUCTION This noise analysis has been completed to determine the noise impacts associated with the development of the proposed Coral Mountain Specific Plan ("Project"). This noise study briefly describes the proposed Project, provides information regarding noise fundamentals, describes the local regulatory setting, provides the study methods and procedures for transportation noise analysis, and evaluates the future exterior noise environment. In addition, this study includes an analysis of the potential Project -related long-term operational noise and short-term construction noise and vibration impacts. 1.1 SITE LOCATION The Project site is located on the southwest corner of re -aligned Madison Street at 58th Avenue in the City of La Quinta, as shown on Exhibit 1-A. 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project consists of a master planned themed resort comprised of a recreational pool (wave basin), a 150 -key hotel, 104 attached dwelling units, 496 detached dwelling units, and 60,000 square feet of retail use. The wave basin is a private facility. The preliminary Project land use plan is presented on Exhibit 1-B. The Project is anticipated to be constructed in phases, with Phase 1 (2021) including resort (wave basin and hotel uses), 104 attached dwelling units, 26 detached dwelling units, and 10,000 square feet of retail use. Project Phase 2 (2023) adds 25,000 square feet of retail. Project Phase 3 (2026) adds 470 detached dwelling units and 25,000 square feet of retail use. 12642-10 Noise Study 7 [,► URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis Lake Cahuilla Park EXHIBIT 1-A: LOCATION MAP 7 N is O o �' C _v m r —� ..s?5 o In Lake Cahuilla aNi QV 3 0,4 Quarry Al La Ouinra Fazio Ln`: r' a PGA Went Colt Coutes a PGA via Herm dal,. Greg Norman .s Golf Conran T+buron Dr ro G klad son St Vrew iL C.)0 La Quinta Golf Course The Palms Golf Club 58th Ave f -- — --- Ararelki I 11 n 1 1 R�alusta0� ' SITE ,u3,6 I I / Andalusia �--� Country Coral Mountain 1 1 � 1� Club -t/ LEGEND: Ragbnal Park Tn _bgy At La Ouato 114 62nd Ave Rustic Canr"C)� Monroe Sl rn 61st Ave 62nd Atir Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, lntermap, increment P Carp., GEBCO, USGS, FAO, NPS, NRCAN, GeaBase, IGN, Kadaster NL, Ordnance Survey, Esri Japan, MET!, Esri Chino (Hong Kong), (c) OpenStreetMop contributors and the 515 12642-10 Noise Study 8 `�► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis EXHIBIT 1-B: PRELIMINARY LAND USE PLAN Coral Mountain Planning Area 11 ow Density Residential(1)1 I Planning ,4 ea I l\ Neighbor Commejdial »rA Planning Area II Future Low Den}ity Residential (3) Planning Area II Future low Density Residential (2) nn< r --ter Planning A�ea IV Openo Sp ce Ac IqnnAred Ill Jjesod (4) • Planning Area II Future Low DensityResidential (4) Planning Area 111 Resort (3)--- ',I Resod 1 � donning Area III Resort (5) • Platin ng Area III Reu rl (2) Planning Area II Future Low Denslty Residential (5) Planning Area III --c Resort (6) _ O 0 12642-10 Noise Study 1 4<11,1i,e arca .11! Density (.11 Pa e1ge.meoaComm.rc,nl an Ac PA II row 1:15mrly liniclarrhol:ur,,o,o1 23.7 Ac 99.6 Ilnils [oetocr.a xeueemmq IIrA Pn III - .Resorl C.2)1. Wave lDe Farm - lirr [) • Rclidc41,11 Ref [ )-Remeernial Reaorl V) 1-losAngi Area 6.41aa c. a« nu: [A.chedie<nrid) NIA rew ,otwl 39435 do 730.1Is rrrA Coral Mountain Planning Area 11 ow Density Residential(1)1 I Planning ,4 ea I l\ Neighbor Commejdial »rA Planning Area II Future Low Den}ity Residential (3) Planning Area II Future low Density Residential (2) nn< r --ter Planning A�ea IV Openo Sp ce Ac IqnnAred Ill Jjesod (4) • Planning Area II Future Low DensityResidential (4) Planning Area 111 Resort (3)--- ',I Resod 1 � donning Area III Resort (5) • Platin ng Area III Reu rl (2) Planning Area II Future Low Denslty Residential (5) Planning Area III --c Resort (6) _ O 0 12642-10 Noise Study 1 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 2 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 2 FUNDAMENTALS Noise is simply defined as "unwanted sound." Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm or when it has adverse effects on health. Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a decibel (dB). A - weighted decibels (dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to broad frequency noise source by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear. Exhibit 2-A presents a summary of the typical noise levels and their subjective loudness and effects that are described in more detail below. EXHIBIT 2-A: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS COMMON OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES COMMON INDOOR ACTIVITIES A - WEIGHTED SOUND LEVEL dBA SUBJECTIVE LOUDNESS EFFECTS OF NOISE THRESHOLD OF PAIN 140 HEARIN , SPEECH INTERFERENCE NEAR JET ENGINE 130 INTOLERABLE OR DEAFENING 120 JET FLY -OVER AT 300m (1000 ft) ROCK BAND 110 LOUD AUTO HORN 100 VERY NOISY GAS LAWN MOWER AT 1m (3 ft) 40 DIESEL TRUCK AT 15m (50 ft), at 80 krn/hr (50 mph) FOOD BLENDER AT 1m (3 ft) 80 NOISY URBAN AREA, DAYTIME VACUUM CLEANER AT 3m (10 ft) 70 LOUD HEAVY TRAFFIC AT 90m (300 ft) NORMAL SPEECH AT 1m (3 ft) 60 QUIET URBAN DAYTIME LARGE BUSINESS OFFICE 50 MODERATE SLEEP DISTURBANCE QUIET URBAN NIGHTTIME THEATER, LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM (BACKGROUND) 40 QUIET SUBURBAN NIGHTTIME LIBRARY 30 FAINT NO EFFECT QUIET RURAL NIGHTTIME BEDROOM AT NIGHT, CONCERT HALL (BACKGROUND) 20 BROADCAST/RECORDING STUDIO 10 VERY FAINT LOWEST THRESHOLD OF HUMAN HEARING LOWEST THRESHOLD OF HUMAN HEARING 0 2.1 RANGE OF NOISE Since the range of intensities that the human ear can detect is so large, the scale frequently used to measure intensity is a scale based on multiples of 10, the logarithmic scale. The scale for measuring intensity is the decibel scale. Each interval of 10 decibels indicates a sound energy ten times greater than before, which is perceived by the human ear as being roughly twice as loud. (4) The most common sounds vary between 40 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud). Normal conversation at three feet is roughly at 60 dBA, while loud jet engine noises equate to 110 dBA at approximately 100 feet, which can cause serious discomfort. (5) Another important aspect of noise is the duration of the sound and the way it is described and distributed in time. 12642-10 Noise Study 3 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 2.2 NOISE DESCRIPTORS Environmental noise descriptors are generally based on averages, rather than instantaneous, noise levels. The most commonly used figure is the equivalent level (Leq). Equivalent sound levels are not measured directly but are calculated from sound pressure levels typically measured in A - weighted decibels (dBA). The equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady state sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period and is commonly used to describe the "average" noise levels within the environment. Peak hour or average noise levels, while useful, do not completely describe a given noise environment. Noise levels lower than peak hour may be disturbing if they occur during times when quiet is most desirable, namely evening and nighttime (sleeping) hours. To account for this, the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), representing a composite 24-hour noise level is utilized. The CNEL is the weighted average of the intensity of a sound, with corrections for time of day, and averaged over 24 hours. The time -of -day corrections require the addition of 5 decibels to dBA Leq sound levels in the evening from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., and the addition of 10 decibels to dBA Leq sound levels at night between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. These additions are made to account for the noise sensitive time periods during the evening and night hours when sound appears louder. CNEL does not represent the actual sound level heard at any time, but rather represents the total sound exposure. The City of La Quinta relies on the 24-hour CNEL level to assess land use compatibility with transportation related noise sources. 2.3 SOUND PROPAGATION When sound propagates over a distance, it changes in level and frequency content. The way noise reduces with distance depends on the following factors. 2.3.1 GEOMETRIC SPREADING Sound from a localized source (i.e., a stationary point source) propagates uniformly outward in a spherical pattern. The sound level attenuates (or decreases) at a rate of 6 dB for each doubling of distance from a point source. Highways consist of several localized noise sources on a defined path and hence can be treated as a line source, which approximates the effect of several point sources. Noise from a line source propagates outward in a cylindrical pattern, often referred to as cylindrical spreading. Sound levels attenuate at a rate of 3 dB for each doubling of distance from a line source. (4) 2.3.2 GROUND ABSORPTION The propagation path of noise from a highway to a receiver is usually very close to the ground. Noise attenuation from ground absorption and reflective wave canceling adds to the attenuation associated with geometric spreading. Traditionally, the excess attenuation has also been expressed in terms of attenuation per doubling of distance. This approximation is usually sufficiently accurate for distances of less than 200 ft. For acoustically hard sites (i.e., sites with a reflective surface between the source and the receiver, such as a parking lot or body of water), no excess ground attenuation is assumed. For acoustically absorptive or soft sites (i.e., those 12642-10 Noise Study 4 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis sites with an absorptive ground surface between the source and the receiver such as soft dirt, grass, or scattered bushes and trees), an excess ground attenuation value of 1.5 dB per doubling of distance is normally assumed. When added to the cylindrical spreading, the excess ground attenuation results in an overall drop-off rate of 4.5 dB per doubling of distance from a line source. (6) 2.3.3 ATMOSPHERIC EFFECTS Receivers located downwind from a source can be exposed to increased noise levels relative to calm conditions, whereas locations upwind can have lowered noise levels. Sound levels can be increased at large distances (e.g., more than 500 feet) due to atmospheric temperature inversion (i.e., increasing temperature with elevation). Other factors such as air temperature, humidity, and turbulence can also have significant effects. (4) 2.3.4 SHIELDING A large object or barrier in the path between a noise source and a receiver can substantially attenuate noise levels at the receiver. The amount of attenuation provided by shielding depends on the size of the object and the frequency content of the noise source. Shielding by trees and other such vegetation typically only has an "out of sight, out of mind" effect. That is, the perception of noise impact tends to decrease when vegetation blocks the line -of -sight to nearby residents. However, for vegetation to provide a substantial, or even noticeable, noise reduction, the vegetation area must be at least 15 feet in height, 100 feet wide and dense enough to completely obstruct the line -of sight between the source and the receiver. This size of vegetation may provide up to 5 dBA of noise reduction. The FHWA does not consider the planting of vegetation to be a noise abatement measure. (6) 2.4 NOISE CONTROL Noise control is the process of obtaining an acceptable noise environment for an observation point or receiver by controlling the noise source, transmission path, receiver, or all three. This concept is known as the source -path -receiver concept. In general, noise control measures can be applied to these three elements. 2.5 NOISE BARRIER ATTENUATION Effective noise barriers can reduce noise levels by up to 10 to 15 dBA, cutting the loudness of traffic noise in half. A noise barrier is most effective when placed close to the noise source or receiver. Noise barriers, however, do have limitations. For a noise barrier to work, it must be high enough and long enough to block the path of the noise source. (6) 2.6 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY WITH NOISE Some land uses are more tolerant of noise than others. For example, schools, hospitals, churches, and residences are more sensitive to noise intrusion than are commercial or industrial developments and related activities. As ambient noise levels affect the perceived amenity or livability of a development, so too can the mismanagement of noise impacts impair the economic 12642-10 Noise Study 5 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis health and growth potential of a community by reducing the area's desirability as a place to live, shop and work. For this reason, land use compatibility with the noise environment is an important consideration in the planning and design process. The FHWA encourages State and Local government to regulate land development in such a way that noise -sensitive land uses are either prohibited from being located adjacent to a highway, or that the developments are planned, designed, and constructed in such a way that noise impacts are minimized. (7) 2.7 COMMUNITY RESPONSE TO NOISE Community responses to noise may range from registering a complaint by telephone or letter, to initiating court action, depending upon everyone's susceptibility to noise and personal attitudes about noise. Several factors are related to the level of community annoyance including: • Fear associated with noise producing activities; • Socio-economic status and educational level; • Perception that those affected are being unfairly treated; • Attitudes regarding the usefulness of the noise -producing activity; • Belief that the noise source can be controlled. Approximately ten percent of the population has a very low tolerance for noise and will object to any noise not of their making. Consequently, even in the quietest environment, some complaints will occur. Another twenty-five percent of the population will not complain even in very severe noise environments. Thus, a variety of reactions can be expected from people exposed to any given noise environment. (8) Surveys have shown that about ten percent of the people exposed to traffic noise of 60 dBA will report being highly annoyed with the noise, and each increase of one dBA is associated with approximately two percent more people being highly annoyed. When traffic noise exceeds 60 dBA or aircraft noise exceeds 55 dBA, people may begin to complain. (8) Despite this variability in behavior on an individual level, the population can be expected to exhibit the following responses to changes in noise levels as shown on Exhibit 2-B. An increase or decrease of 1 dBA cannot be perceived except in carefully controlled laboratory experiments (9), a change of 3 dBA are considered barely perceptible, and changes of 5 dBA are considered readily perceptible. (6) Twice as Loud Readily Perceptible Barely Perceptible Just Perceptible EXHIBIT 2-B: NOISE LEVEL INCREASE PERCEPTION 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Noise Level Increase (dBA) 12642-10 Noise Study 6 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 2.8 EXPOSURE TO HIGH NOISE LEVELS The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) sets legal limits on noise exposure in the workplace. The permissible exposure limit (PEL) for a worker over an eight-hour day is 90 dBA. The OSHA standard uses a 5 dBA exchange rate. This means that when the noise level is increased by 5 dBA, the amount of time a person can be exposed to a certain noise level to receive the same dose is cut in half. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) has recommended that all worker exposures to noise should be controlled below a level equivalent to 85 dBA for eight hours to minimize occupational noise induced hearing loss. NIOSH also recommends a 3 dBA exchange rate so that every increase by 3 dBA doubles the amount of the noise and halves the recommended amount of exposure time. (10) OSHA has implemented requirements to protect all workers in general industry (e.g. the manufacturing and the service sectors) for employers to implement a Hearing Conservation Program where workers are exposed to a time weighted average noise level of 85 dBA or higher over an eight-hour work shift. Hearing Conservation Programs require employers to measure noise levels, provide free annual hearing exams and free hearing protection, provide training, and conduct evaluations of the adequacy of the hearing protectors in use unless changes to tools, equipment and schedules are made so that they are less noisy and worker exposure to noise is less than the 85 dBA. This noise study does not evaluate the noise exposure of workers within a project or construction site based on CEQA requirements, and instead, evaluates Project -related operational and construction noise levels at the nearby sensitive receiver locations in the Project study area. 2.9 VIBRATION Per the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment (11), vibration is the periodic oscillation of a medium or object. The rumbling sound caused by the vibration of room surfaces is called structure -borne noise. Sources of ground -borne vibrations include natural phenomena (e.g., earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, sea waves, landslides) or human -made causes (e.g., explosions, machinery, traffic, trains, construction equipment). Vibration sources may be continuous, such as factory machinery, or transient, such as explosions. As is the case with airborne sound, ground -borne vibrations may be described by amplitude and frequency. There are several different methods that are used to quantify vibration. The peak particle velocity (PPV) is defined as the maximum instantaneous peak of the vibration signal. The PPV is most frequently used to describe vibration impacts to buildings but is not always suitable for evaluating human response (annoyance) because it takes some time for the human body to respond to vibration signals. Instead, the human body responds to average vibration amplitude often described as the root mean square (RMS). The RMS amplitude is defined as the average of the squared amplitude of the signal and is most frequently used to describe the effect of vibration on the human body. Decibel notation (VdB) is commonly used to measure RMS. Decibel notation (VdB) serves to reduce the range of numbers used to describe human response to vibration. Typically, ground -borne vibration generated by man-made activities attenuates rapidly with 12642-10 Noise Study 7 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis distance from the source of the vibration. Sensitive receivers for vibration include structures (especially older masonry structures), people (especially residents, the elderly, and sick), vibration -sensitive equipment and/or activities. The background vibration -velocity level in residential areas is generally 50 VdB. Ground -borne vibration is normally perceptible to humans at approximately 65 VdB. For most people, a vibration -velocity level of 75 VdB is the approximate dividing line between barely perceptible and distinctly perceptible levels. Typical outdoor sources of perceptible ground -borne vibration are construction equipment, steel -wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads. If a roadway is smooth, the ground -borne vibration is rarely perceptible. The range of interest is from approximately 50 VdB, which is the typical background vibration -velocity level, to 100 VdB, which is the general threshold where minor damage can occur in fragile buildings. Exhibit 2-C illustrates common vibration sources and the human and structural response to ground -borne vibration. 12642-10 Noise Study 8 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis EXHIBIT 2-C: TYPICAL LEVELS OF GROUND -BORNE VIBRATION Human/Structural Response Threshold. mirror cosmetic damage fragile buildings Difficulty with tasks such as reading a VDT screen Residential annoyance, infrequent events (e.g. commuter rail) Residential annoyance, frequent events (e.g. rapid transit) Limit for vibration sensitive equipment. Approx. threshold for human perception of vibration Velocity Typical SOurces Level* (50 ft from source) -I-- Blasting from construction proiects - Bulldozers and other heavy tracked construction equipment - GOmmuter rail, upper range Rapid transit, upper range Commuter rail, typical Bus or truck over bump Rapid transit, typical Bus or truck, typical Typical background vibration ' RMS Vibration Velocity Level in VOB relative to 1O-6 Thchesfsecond Source: Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Transit Noise Impact and Vibration Assessment. 12642-10 Noise Study 9 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 10 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 3 REGULATORY SETTING To limit population exposure to physically and/or psychologically damaging as well as intrusive noise levels, the federal government, the State of California, various county governments, and most municipalities in the state have established standards and ordinances to control noise. In most areas, automobile and truck traffic is the major source of environmental noise. Traffic activity generally produces an average sound level that remains constant with time. Air and rail traffic, and commercial and industrial activities are also major sources of noise in some areas. Federal, state, and local agencies regulate different aspects of environmental noise. Federal and state agencies generally set noise standards for mobile sources such as aircraft and motor vehicles, while regulation of stationary sources is left to local agencies. 3.1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA NOISE REQUIREMENTS The State of California regulates freeway noise, sets standards for sound transmission, provides occupational noise control criteria, identifies noise standards, and provides guidance for local land use compatibility. State law requires that each county and city adopt a General Plan that includes a Noise Element which is to be prepared per guidelines adopted by the Governor's Office of Planning and Research. (12) The purpose of the Noise Element is to limit the exposure of the community to excessive noise levels. In addition, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that all known environmental effects of a project be analyzed, including environmental noise impacts. 3.2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE The State of California's noise insulation standards are codified in the California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Building Standards Administrative Code, Part 2, and the California Building Code. These noise standards are applied to new construction in California for the purpose of controlling interior noise levels resulting from exterior noise sources. The regulations specify that acoustical studies must be prepared when noise -sensitive structures, such as residential buildings, schools, or hospitals, are developed near major transportation noise sources, and where such noise sources create an exterior noise level of 60 dBA CNEL or higher. Acoustical studies that accompany building plans for noise -sensitive land uses must demonstrate that the structure has been designed to limit interior noise in habitable rooms to acceptable noise levels. For new residential buildings, schools, and hospitals, the acceptable interior noise limit for new construction is 45 dBA CNEL. 3.3 CITY OF LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS ELEMENT The City of La Quinta has adopted an Environmental Hazards Element (Chapter 4), Noise section, of the General Plan which identifies areas where noise levels are expected to reach unacceptable levels, and provides policies and programs which will assure that noise levels do not negatively impact the community. (13) The Noise Element specifies the maximum exterior and interior noise levels for new developments impacted by transportation noise sources such as arterial roads, 12642-10 Noise Study 11 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis freeways, airports and railroads. To protect City residents from excessive noise, the Environmental Hazards Element contains the following goal related to the Project: N-1 A healthful noise environment which complements the City's residential and resort character. The noise policies specified in the City of La Quinta Environmental Hazards Element provide the guidelines necessary to satisfy this goal. To minimize noise impacts to noise -sensitive land uses, the City has established Policy N-1.1 to identify noise standards consistent with the Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments, Table IV -3, for various land uses. The Noise Element also provides several policies to minimize noise impacts from transportation, such as Policy N-1.2, which requires a noise study and any necessary mitigation measures for new developments along roadways where the noise levels are in excess of 65 dBA CNEL. The noise criteria identified in the City of La Quinta Environmental Hazards Element, Noise section, are guidelines to evaluate the land use compatibility of transportation related noise. The compatibility criteria, shown on Exhibit 3-A, provides the City with a planning tool to gauge the compatibility of land uses relative to existing and future exterior noise levels. The Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments (Table IV -3) matrix in the City of La Quinta General Plan provides guidelines to evaluate the acceptability of transportation -related noise level impacts. The Project residential and hotel uses, are considered normally acceptable with exterior noise levels below 60 dBA CNEL and conditionally acceptable with exterior noise levels of up to 70 dBA CNEL. For conditionally acceptable land use, the General Plan indicates new construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements is made and needed noise insulation features are included in the design. (13) Based on the City of La Quinta land use compatibility guidelines for the Project land uses, this noise study has been prepared to satisfy the 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level criteria in outdoor living areas, and an interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL consistent with the State of California Building Code. 12642-10 Noise Study 12 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis EXHIBIT 3-A: LAND USE COMPATIBILITY FOR COMMUNITY NOISE ENVIRONMENTS Land Uses CN EL (dBA) 5o 55 6o 65 7o 75 8o Residential - Single Family Dwellings, Duplex, Mobile Homes i; F *;+;'•*• C1 D Residential — Multiple Family u k -I ,n Transient Lodging: Hotels and Motels %///// F;. VI I I n School Classrooms, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes and Convalescent Hospitals X:407/// 4i n n� _ _ VI 1 n Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheaters :4440:40:40:440.04:4.4•4 • ` 1 1 Sports Arenas, Outdoor Spectator Sports' r:y Y'Y' v Y`•* *.*** '' `" }:vY �v rYMI` 11111 11111111 Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks 1--1 Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation, Cemeteries '/ / % ii .5J I 1 1111 1 Office Buildings, Business, Commercial and Professional / ///// Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities,/// Agriculture /Kr,t3Mn f Source: California Department of Health Services, "Guidelines for the Preparation and Content of the Noise Element of the Genera! Plan," 1990 Normally Acceptable: With no special noise reduction requirements assuming standard construction. c Conditionally Acceptable: New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirement is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design Normally Unacceptable: New construction is discouraged. If new construction does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. Ii7 Clearly Unacceptable: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. 12642-10 Noise Study 13 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 3.4 OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS To analyze noise impacts originating from a designated fixed location or private property such as the Project, stationary -source (operational) noise such as the expected wave basin/wave machine activity, outdoor pool/spa activity, outdoor activity, and neighborhood commercial land use activity are typically evaluated against standards established under a jurisdiction's Municipal Code. The City of La Quinta Municipal Code, Ordinance 550, Sections 9.100.210 (B) and (C) establish the noise level standards for stationary noise sources. For residential properties, the exterior noise level shall not exceed 65 dBA 1_50 during the daytime hours (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and 50 dBA L50 during the nighttime hours. (14) The exterior noise level standards shall apply for a cumulative period of 30 minutes in any hour, as well as plus 5 dBA cannot be exceeded for a cumulative period of more than 15 minutes in any hour, or the standard plus 10 dBA for a cumulative period of more than 5 minutes in any hour, or the standard plus 15 dBA for a cumulative period of more than 1 minute in any hour, or the standard plus 20 dBA for any period of time. The City of La Quinta operational noise level standards are shown on Table 3-1 and included in Appendix 3.1. TABLE 3-1: OPERATIONAL NOISE STANDARDS City Land Use Time Period Exterior Noise Level Standards) L50 (30 mins) 125 (15 mins) 18 (5 mins) 12 (1 min) Lmax (<1 min) La Quintal Residential, Schools, Hospitals & Churches 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. 65 70 75 80 85 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 50 55 60 65 70 1 The noise level exceeded "n" percent of the time during the measurement per'od. L25 15 the noise level exceeded 25% of the time. 2 Source: City of La Quinta Municipal Code, Ordinance 550, Section 9.100.210 (B) & (C) (Appendix 3.1). 3.5 CONSTRUCTION NOISE STANDARDS To analyze noise impacts originating from the construction of Coral Mountain Specific Plan, noise from construction activities is typically evaluated against standards established under a City's Municipal Code. The Municipal Code noise standards for construction are described below for the City of La Quinta to determine the potential noise impacts at nearby receiver locations. To control noise impacts associated with the construction of the proposed Project, the City has established limits to the hours of operation. The City of La Quinta Municipal Code, Section 6.08.050 indicates that construction, shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. Mondays to Fridays during the months of October to April, and to the hours of 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Mondays to Fridays during the months of May to September. All year, construction activities are limited to 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, with no activity allowed on Sundays. (14) However, the City's General Plan and Municipal Code do not establish numeric maximum acceptable construction source noise levels at potentially affected receivers, which would allow for a quantified determination of what CEQA constitutes as the generation of noise levels in 12642-10 Noise Study 14 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis excess of standards or as a substantial temporary or periodic noise increase, the following construction noise level thresholds are used in this noise study. To evaluate whether the Project will generate potentially significant temporary construction noise levels at off-site sensitive receiver locations, a construction -related noise level threshold is adopted from the Criteria for Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure prepared by the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH). (15) A division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, NIOSH identifies a noise level threshold based on the duration of exposure to the source. The construction related noise level threshold starts at 85 dBA for more than eight hours per day, and for every 3 dBA increase, the exposure time is cut in half. This results in noise level thresholds of 88 dBA for more than four hours per day, 92 dBA for more than one hour per day, 96 dBA for more than 30 minutes per day, and up to 100 dBA for more than 15 minutes per day. (15) For the purposes of this analysis, the lowest, more conservative construction noise level threshold of 85 dBA Leq is used as an acceptable threshold for construction noise at the nearby sensitive receiver locations. Since this construction -related noise level threshold represents the energy average of the noise source over a given time, they are expressed as Leq noise levels. Therefore, the noise level threshold of 85 dBA Leq over a period of eight hours or more is used to evaluate the potential Project -related construction noise level impacts at the nearby sensitive receiver locations. 3.6 CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION STANDARDS Since the City of La Quinta does not identify specific construction vibration level standards, the County of Riverside General Plan Noise Element Policy N 16.3 vibration standards are used in this noise study. Policy N 16.3 identifies a motion velocity perception threshold for vibration due to passing trains of 0.01 inches per second (in/sec) over the range of one to 100 Hz. (16) For the purposes of this analysis, the perception threshold of 0.01 in/sec shall be used to assess the potential impacts due to Project construction at nearby sensitive receiver locations. Typically, the human response at the perception threshold for vibration includes annoyance in residential areas as previously shown on Exhibit 2-C, when vibration levels expressed in vibration decibels (VdB) approach 75 VdB. The County of Riverside, however, identifies a vibration perception threshold of 0.01 in/sec. For vibration levels expressed in velocity, the human body responds to the average vibration amplitude often described as the root -mean -square (RMS). The RMS of a signal is the average of the squared amplitude of the signal, typically calculated over a one -second period. As with airborne sound, the RMS velocity is often expressed in decibel notation as vibration decibels (VdB), which serves to reduce the range of numbers used to describe human response to vibration. Therefore, the County of Riverside vibration standard of 0.01 in/sec in RMS velocity levels is used in this analysis to assess the human perception of vibration levels due to Project -related construction activities. 12642-10 Noise Study 15 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 16 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 4 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA The following significance criteria are based on currently adopted guidance provided by Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. (1) For the purposes of this report, impacts would be potentially significant if the Project results in or causes: A. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? B. Generation of excessive ground -borne vibration or ground -borne noise levels? C. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? While the City of La Quinta General Plan provide direction on noise compatibility and establish noise standards by land use type that are sufficient to assess the significance of noise impacts, they do not define the levels at which increases are considered substantial for use under Significance Criteria A. CEQA Appendix G Significance Criteria C applies to nearby public and private airports, if any, and the Project's land use compatibility. 4.1 CEQA GUIDELINES NOT FURTHER ANALYZED The Project site is located roughly 19 miles southeast of Palm Springs International Airport, and five miles west of the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport. Therefore, the Project site is not located within two miles of a public airport or the vicinity of a private airstrip, and as such, no impact related to the exposure of people residing or working in the Project area to excessive airport related noise levels is anticipated. 4.2 NOISE -SENSITIVE RECEIVERS Noise level increases resulting from the Project are evaluated based on the Appendix G CEQA Guidelines described above at the closest sensitive receiver locations. Under CEQA, consideration must be given to the magnitude of the increase, the existing ambient noise levels, and the location of noise -sensitive receivers to determine if a noise increase represents a significant adverse environmental impact. Unfortunately, there is no completely satisfactory way to measure the subjective effects of noise or of the corresponding human reactions of annoyance and dissatisfaction. This is primarily because of the wide variation in individual thresholds of annoyance and differing individual experiences with noise. Thus, an important way of determining a person's subjective reaction to a new noise is the comparison of it to the existing environment to which one has adapted—the so-called ambient environment. In general, the more a new noise exceeds the previously existing ambient noise level, the less acceptable the new noise will typically be judged. The Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON) (17) developed guidance to be used for the assessment of project -generated increases in noise levels that consider the ambient noise level. The FICON recommendations are based on 12642-10 Noise Study 17 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis studies that relate aircraft noise levels to the percentage of persons highly annoyed by aircraft noise. Although the FICON recommendations were specifically developed to assess aircraft noise impacts, these recommendations are often used in environmental noise impact assessments involving the use of cumulative noise exposure metrics, such as the average -daily noise level (CNEL) and equivalent continuous noise level (Leq). For example, if the ambient noise environment is quiet (<60 dBA) and the new noise source greatly increases the noise levels, an impact may occur if the noise criteria may be exceeded. Therefore, for this analysis, FICON identifies a readily perceptible 5 dBA or greater project -related noise level increase is considered a significant impact when the noise criteria for a given land use is exceeded. Per the FICON, in areas where the without project noise levels range from 60 to 65 dBA, a 3 dBA barely perceptible noise level increase appears to be appropriate for most people. When the without project noise levels already exceed 65 dBA, any increase in community noise louder than 1.5 dBA or greater is considered a significant impact if the noise criteria for a given land use is exceeded, since it likely contributes to an existing noise exposure exceedance. Table 4-1 below provides a summary of the potential noise impact significance criteria, based on guidance from FICON. TABLE 4-1: SIGNIFICANCE OF NOISE IMPACTS AT NOISE -SENSITIVE RECEIVERS Without Project Noise Level Potential Significant Impact < 60 dBA 5 dBA or more 60 - 65 dBA 3 dBA or more >65dBA 1.5 dBA or more Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON), 1992. 4.3 SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY Noise impacts shall be considered significant if any of the following occur as a direct result of the proposed development. The significance criteria is shown on Table 4-2. OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE • When the noise levels at existing and future noise -sensitive land uses (e.g. residential, etc.): o are less than 60 dBA CNEL and the Project creates a readily perceptible 5 dBA CNEL or greater Project -related noise level increase: or o range from 60 to 65 dBA CNEL and the Project creates a barely perceptible 3 dBA CNEL or greater Project -related noise level increase: or o already exceed 65 dBA CNEL, and the Project creates a community noise level increase of greater than 1.5 dBA CNEL (FICON, 1992). ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE • If the on-site exterior noise levels exceed 65 dBA CNEL at the private outdoor living areas of residential homes, or common outdoor areas at hotel uses. Interior noise levels shall not exceed 45 dBA CNEL for residential homes and the hotel building (City of La Quinta Municipal Code, Ordinance 550, Section 9.100.210 (B) & General Plan Noise Element Policy N-1.2). 12642-10 Noise Study 18 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis OPERATIONAL NOISE • If Project -related operational (stationary -source) noise levels: o exceed the exterior 65 dBA Leq daytime or 50 dBA Leq nighttime noise level standards for residential and hotel land uses. (City of La Quinta Municipal Code, Ordinance 550, Section 9.100.210 (B) & (C)). • If the existing ambient noise levels at the nearby noise -sensitive receivers near the Project site: o are less than 60 dBA Leq and the Project creates a readily perceptible 5 dBA Leq or greater Project -related noise level increase: or o range from 60 to 65 dBA Leq and the Project creates a barely perceptible 3 dBA Leq or greater Project -related noise level increase: or o already exceed 65 dBA Leq, and the Project creates a community noise level increase of greater than 1.5 dBA Leq (FICON, 1992). CONSTRUCTION NOISE & VIBRATION • If Project -related construction activities create noise levels which exceed the 85 dBA Leq acceptable noise level threshold at the nearby sensitive receiver locations (NIOSH, Criteria for Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure). • If short-term Project generated construction vibration levels exceed the County of Riverside vibration standard of 0.01 in/sec RMS at sensitive receiver locations (County of Riverside General Plan Noise Element, Policy N 16.3). TABLE 4-2: SIGNIFICANCE CRITERIA SUMMARY Analysis Receiving Land Use Condition(s) Significance Criteria Daytime Nighttime Off Site 1 Traffic Noise Noise Sensitive If ambient is < 60 dBA CNEL >_ 5 dBA CNEL Project increase If ambient is 60 - 65 dBA CNEL >_ 3 dBA CNEL Project increase If ambient is > 65 dBA CNEL >_ 1.5 dBA CNEL Project increase On -Site Traffic Noise Exterior Noise Level Criteria 65 dBA CNEL Interior Noise Level Standard 45 dBA CNEL Operational Noise3 Exterior Noise Level Standards See Table 3-1. if ambient is < 60 dBA Leq >_ 5 dBA Leq Project increase if ambient is 60 - 65 dBA Leq >_ 3 dBA Leq Project increase if ambient is > 65 dBA Leq >_ 1.5 dBA Leq Project increase Construction4 Noise Level Threshold 85 dBA Leq n/a Vibration Level Threshold 0.01 in/sec RMS n/a 1 Source: FICON, 1992. 'Sources: City of La Quinta General Plan Noise Element & California Building Code. 'Sources: City of La Quinta Municipal Code, Section 6.08.050 (Appendix 3.1) and FICON guidance. 'Sources: NIOSH, Criteria for Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure and County of Riverside General Plan Noise Element, Policy 16.3. "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.; "n/a" = No nighttime construction activity is permitted, so no nighttime construction noise level limits are identified; "RMS" = root -mean -square 12642-10 Noise Study 19 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 20 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 5 EXISTING NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS To assess the existing noise level environment, 24-hour noise level measurements were taken at ten locations in the Project study area. The receiver locations were selected to describe and document the existing noise environment within the Project study area. Exhibit 5-A provides the boundaries of the Project study area and the noise level measurement locations. To fully describe the existing noise conditions, noise level measurements were collected by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on Wednesday October 16th, 2019. Appendix 5.1 includes study area photos. 5.1 MEASUREMENT PROCEDURE AND CRITERIA To describe the existing noise environment, the hourly noise levels were measured during typical weekday conditions over a 24-hour period. By collecting individual hourly noise level measurements, it is possible to describe the daytime and nighttime hourly noise levels and calculate the 24-hour CNEL. The long-term noise readings were recorded using Piccolo Type 2 integrating sound level meter and dataloggers. The Piccolo sound level meters were calibrated using a Larson -Davis calibrator, Model CAL 150. All noise meters were programmed in "slow" mode to record noise levels in "A" weighted form. The sound level meters and microphones were equipped with a windscreen during all measurements. All noise level measurement equipment satisfies the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) standard specifications for sound level meters ANSI S1.4-2014/IEC 61672-1:2013. (18) 5.2 NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS The long-term noise level measurements were positioned as close to the nearest sensitive receiver locations as possible to assess the existing ambient hourly noise levels surrounding the Project site. Both Caltrans and the FTA recognize that it is not reasonable to collect noise level measurements that can fully represent every part of a private yard, patio, deck, or balcony normally used for human activity when estimating impacts for new development projects. This is demonstrated in the Caltrans general site location guidelines which indicate that, sites must be free of noise contamination by sources other than sources of interest. Avoid sites located near sources such as barking dogs, lawnmowers, pool pumps, and air conditioners unless it is the express intent of the analyst to measure these sources. (4) Further, FTA guidance states, that it is not necessary nor recommended that existing noise exposure be determined by measuring at every noise -sensitive location in the project area. Rather, the recommended approach is to characterize the noise environment for clusters of sites based on measurements or estimates at representative locations in the community. (11) Based on recommendations of Caltrans and the FTA, it is not necessary to collect measurements at each individual building or residence, because each receiver measurement represents a group of buildings that share acoustical equivalence. (11) In other words, the area represented by the receiver shares similar shielding, terrain, and geometric relationship to the reference noise source. Receivers represent a location of noise sensitive areas and are used to estimate the future noise level impacts. Collecting reference ambient noise level measurements at the nearby sensitive receiver locations allows for a comparison of the before and after Project noise levels 12642-10 Noise Study 21 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis and is necessary to assess potential noise impacts due to the Project's contribution to the ambient noise levels. 5.3 NOISE MEASUREMENT RESULTS The noise measurements presented below focus on the average or equivalent sound levels (Leq). The equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady state sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period. Table 5-1 identifies the hourly daytime (7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.) and nighttime (10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m.) noise levels at each noise level measurement location. Additional median noise levels (L50) are provided on Table 5- 1 consistent with the City of La Quinta Municipal Code exterior noise level standards. Appendix 5.2 provides a summary of the existing hourly ambient noise levels described below: • Location L1 represents the noise located on 58th Avenue in front of entrance to Coral Mountain and west of Salida del Sol. The noise levels at this location consist primarily of traffic noise from 58th Avenue and background residential land use noise source activities. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 58.5 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 54.2 dBA Lep with an average nighttime noise level of 51.5 dBA Leq. • Location L2 represents the noise levels on 58th Avenue south of a single-family residential home at 57925 Barristo Circle. The noise levels at this location consist primarily of traffic noise from 58th Avenue and background residential land use noise source activities. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 67.6 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 62.5 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 60.7 dBA Leq. • Location L3 represents the noise levels located northeast of Madison Street and 58th Avenue adjacent to wall enclosing golf course. The noise levels at this location consist primarily of traffic noise from 58th Avenue and Madison Street. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 63.6 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 61.2 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 55.6 dBA Leq. • Location L4 represents the noise levels southeast of Madison Street and 58th Avenue. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 60.1 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 54.5 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 53.2 dBA Leq. The noise levels at this location consist primarily of traffic noise from Street and 58th Avenue • Location L5 represents the noise levels south of 58th Avenue outside northwest corner of the Analusia Country Club. The 24-hour CNEL indicates that the overall exterior noise level is 63.3 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 59.7 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 56.1 dBA Leq. Noise levels at this location are primarily due to traffic from Madison Street, 58th Avenue, and background residential land use activities. • Location L6 represents the noise levels on Calle Conchita southeast of an existing single-family residential home at 80900 Calle Conchita. Noise levels at this location are primarily from traffic on Madison Street. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour 12642-10 Noise Study 22 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis exterior noise level of 63.0 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 58.7 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 55.8 dBA Leq. • Location L7 represents noise levels on 60th Avenue north of gated entrance to a future single- family residential community. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24- hour exterior noise level of 63.1 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 57.9 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 56.1 dBA Leq. The noise levels at this location primarily consist of traffic on 60th Ave. and background residential land use. • Location L8 represents noise levels on the western end of 60th Avenue south of an existing single-family residential home at 80800 60th Avenue. Noise levels at this location are primarily from background residential use. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 47.3 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 43.8 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 39.9 dBA Leq. • Location L9 represents noise levels on Jefferson Street north of Quarry Lane. Noise levels at this location are primarily from traffic on Jefferson Street. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 56.0 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 51.7 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 48.9 dBA Leq. • Location L10 represents the noise levels on 58th Avenue. east of 58th Avenue. and Stone Creek Way intersection. Noise levels at this location primarily consist of traffic on 58th Avenue. The noise level measurements collected show an overall 24-hour exterior noise level of 63.3 dBA CNEL. The energy (logarithmic) average daytime noise level was calculated at 61.9 dBA Leq with an average nighttime noise level of 54.2 dBA Leq. Table 5-1 provides the (energy average) noise levels used to describe the daytime and nighttime ambient conditions. These daytime and nighttime energy average noise levels represent the average of all hourly noise levels observed during these time periods expressed as a single number. Appendix 5.2 provides summary worksheets of the noise levels for each hour as well as the minimum, maximum, L1, L2, Ls, L8, L25, L50, L9o, L95, and L99 percentile noise levels observed during the daytime and nighttime periods. The background ambient noise levels in the Project study area are dominated by the transportation -related noise associated with the arterial roadway network. The 24-hour existing noise level measurements shown on Table 5-1 present the existing ambient noise conditions. 12642-10 Noise Study 23 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 5-1: 24-HOUR AMBIENT NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Location' Description Energy Average Noise Level (d BA Leq)2 CNEL Daytime Nighttime L1 Located on 58th Ave. in front of entrance to Coral Mountain and west of Salida del Sol. 54.2 51.5 58.5 L2 Located on 58th Ave. south of home at 57925 Barristo Cir. 62.5 60.7 67.6 L3 Located northeast of Madison St. and 58th Ave. adjacent to wall enclosing golf course. 61.2 55.6 63.6 L4 Located on the southeast corner of 58th Ave, and Madison St. 54.5 53.2 60.1 L5 Located south of 58th Ave. outside northwest corner of the Analusia Country Club. 59.7 56.1 63.3 L6 Located on Calle Conchita southeast of home at 80900 Calle Conchita. 58.7 55.8 63.0 L7 Located on 60th Ave. north of gated entrance to single family homes. 57.9 56.1 63.1 L8 Located towards the western end of 60th Ave. south of home at 80800 60th Ave. 43.8 39.9 47.3 L9 Located on Jefferson St. north of Quarry Ln. 51.7 48.9 56.0 L10 Located on 58th Ave. slightly east of 58th Ave. and Stone Creek Way intersection. 61.9 54.2 63.3 1 See Exhibit 5-A for the noise level measurement locations. z Energy (logarithmic) average levels. The long-term 24-hour measurement worksheets are included in Appendix 5.2. "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 12642-10 Noise Study 24 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis EXHIBIT 5-A: NOISE MEASUREMENT LOCATIONS LEGEND: ® Measurement Locations 12642-10 Noise Study 25 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 26 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 6 METHODS AND PROCEDURES The following section outlines the methods and procedures used to model and analyze the future traffic noise environment. 6.1 FHWA TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL The expected roadway noise level increases from vehicular traffic were calculated using a computer program that replicates the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Traffic Noise Prediction Model- FHWA-RD-77-108. (19) The FHWA Model arrives at a predicted noise level through a series of adjustments to the Reference Energy Mean Emission Level (REMEL). In California the national REMELs are substituted with the California Vehicle Noise (Calveno) Emission Levels. (20) Adjustments are then made to the REMEL to account for: the roadway classification (e.g., collector, secondary, major or arterial), the roadway active width (i.e., the distance between the center of the outermost travel lanes on each side of the roadway), the total average daily traffic (ADT), the travel speed, the percentages of automobiles, medium trucks, and heavy trucks in the traffic volume, the roadway grade, the angle of view (e.g., whether the roadway view is blocked), the site conditions ("hard" or "soft" relates to the absorption of the ground, pavement, or landscaping), and the percentage of total ADT which flows each hour throughout a 24-hour period. Research conducted by Caltrans has shown that the use of soft site conditions is appropriate for the application of the FHWA traffic noise prediction model used in this analysis. (21) This methodology is consistent with the County of Riverside Office of Industrial Hygiene Requirements for Determining and Mitigating Traffic Noise Impacts to Residential Structures, which specifically requires the FHWA RD -77-108 model to be used in analysis within the County's jurisdiction. (22) 6.1.1 OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL INPUTS Table 6-1 presents the roadway parameters used to assess the Project's off-site transportation noise impacts. Table 6-1 identifies the 29 study area roadway segments, the distance from the centerline to adjacent land use based on the functional roadway classifications per the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element, and the posted vehicle speeds. Consistent with Coral Mountain Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis prepared by Urban Crossroads, Inc. (2) the off-site traffic noise analysis maintains a peak hour to average daily traffic (peak -to -daily) relationship of approximately 9.30% and includes the following traffic scenarios. • Existing (2019) • Existing Plus Project (E+P) • Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Project (EAP) • Existing Plus Ambient Growth Plus Cumulative Projects without and with Project for each of the following phases (EAC and EAPC): o Project Phase 1 (2021) o Project Phase 2 (2023) 12642-10 Noise Study 27 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis o Project Buildout (Phase 3, 2026) o Project Buildout (Phase 3, 2026) — Special Event • General Plan buildout (2040) Without Project Conditions — establishes future year baseline to evaluate the proposed Project. • General Plan buildout (2040) With Project Conditions — represents future year baseline traffic conditions with the proposed Project. The average daily traffic (ADT) volumes used for this study are presented on Table 6-2. Table 6- 3 provides the time of day (daytime, evening, and nighttime) vehicle splits and Table 6-4 presents the traffic flow distributions (vehicle mix) used for this analysis. The vehicle mix provides the hourly distribution percentages of automobile, medium trucks, and heavy trucks for input into the FHWA noise prediction model. 12642-10 Noise Study 28 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 6-1: OFF-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS ID Roadway Segment Location Adjacent Land Use' Roadway Classification' Distance From Centerline To Nearest Adjacent Land Use (Feet)2 Vehicle Speed (mph) 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 City of La Quinta GC/LDR Major Arterial 64' 55 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 City of La Quinta LDR/MHR/OS/GC Major Arterial 64' 55 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 City of La Quinta MHR/OS Major Arterial 64' 55 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 City of La Quinta Festival District Primary Arterial 54' 50 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 City of La Quinta LDR Primary Arterial 54' 50 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 City of La Quinta LDR Primary Arterial 54' 50 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. City of La Quinta LDR/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 City of La Quinta LDR/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 City of La Quinta LDR/GC Secondary Arterial 51' 45 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 City of Indio LDR Boulevard 64' 50 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 City of Indio LDR Boulevard 64' 50 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 City of La Quinta LDR Primary Arterial 54' 50 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. City of La Quinta LDR Primary Arterial 54' 50 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 City of La Quinta LDR/GC Primary Arterial 54' 50 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 City of La Quinta LDR/GC Primary Arterial 54' 50 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. City of La Quinta LDR/GC Primary Arterial 54' 50 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. City of La Quinta LDR/GC Primary Arterial 54' 50 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. City of Indio LDR Boulevard 64' 50 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. City of La Quinta GC/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. City of La Quinta LDR/MHR/GC/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. City of La Quinta LDR/MHR/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. City of La Quinta LDR/OS Primary Arterial 54' 50 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. City of La Quinta LDR/MHR Secondary Arterial 51' 45 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. City of La Quinta LDR/MCF Secondary Arterial 51' 45 12642-10 Noise Study 29 ( URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis ID Roadway Segment Location Adjacent Land Use'Classification' Roadway Distance From Centerline To Nearest Adjacent Land Use (Feet)2 Vehicle Speed (mph)3 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. Riverside County LDR Major 59' 50 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. Riverside County LDR Major 59' 50 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. City of La Quinta LDR Collector 40' 40 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. City of La Quinta LDR/MHR/OS Secondary Arterial 51' 45 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. Riverside County LDR/MHR Arterial 64' 50 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. z Distance to adjacent land use based on the right-of-way distances for each functional roadway classification provided in the General Plan Circulation Element. Source: The Wave -Coral Mountain Traffic Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads, Inc. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space TABLE 6-2: AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES ID Roadway Segment Average Daily Traffic (1,000's)' Existing 2019 EA EAC 2021 EAC 2023 EAC 2026 EACSE 2026 General Plan No Project With Project No Project With Project No Project With Project No Project With Project No Project With Project No Project With Project No Project With Project 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 22.8 23.3 28.2 28.7 32.0 32.1 33.8 33.9 36.5 37.0 36.5 37.0 51.5 52.0 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 16.2 16.9 19.4 20.1 22.9 23.0 24.0 24.1 25.8 26.5 25.8 26.5 34.3 35.0 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 12.7 13.6 16.3 17.2 18.4 18.6 19.8 20.0 21.7 22.5 21.7 22.6 32.2 33.0 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 5.9 6.4 9.0 9.5 8.2 8.3 9.1 9.2 10.8 11.3 10.8 11.3 22.5 23.0 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 6.9 7.7 11.3 12.1 9.4 9.5 10.9 11.0 13.3 14.0 13.3 14.0 32.3 33.0 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 4.5 5.8 7.5 8.8 7.5 7.8 8.6 8.9 10.4 11.7 10.4 11.8 23.7 25.0 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. 9.4 11.9 15.2 17.7 13.8 14.4 15.3 16.0 18.2 20.7 18.2 21.0 42.5 45.0 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 6.7 9.7 10.7 13.7 11.3 12.1 12.3 13.3 14.3 17.4 14.3 18.0 31.0 34.0 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 2.8 3.9 5.1 6.2 4.7 5.0 5.4 5.8 6.6 7.6 6.6 7.9 19.0 20.0 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 9.6 10.1 10.2 10.7 12.8 12.9 13.2 13.3 13.8 14.3 13.8 14.3 15.1 15.6 12642-10 Noise Study 30 L�1 URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis ID Roadway Segment Average Daily Traffic (1,000's)1 Existing 2019 EA EAC 2021 EAC 2023 EAC 2026 EACSE 2026 General Plan No Project With Project No Project With Project No Project With Project No Project With Project No Project With Project No Project With Project No Project With Project 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 7.5 8.2 9.7 10.4 10.7 10.8 11.7 11.8 13.1 13.8 13.1 13.8 19.3 20.0 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 5.1 5.9 8.9 9.7 8.5 8.6 10.3 10.4 12.9 13.6 12.9 13.6 31.3 32.0 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. 3.9 4.6 7.6 8.3 6.8 6.9 9.2 9.3 12.6 13.3 12.6 13.3 34.3 35.0 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 3.4 4.4 6.1 7.1 6.7 6.9 9.0 9.3 12.0 13.1 12.0 13.2 24.9 26.0 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 2.7 2.9 5.2 5.4 6.4 6.4 9.2 9.2 12.6 12.8 12.6 12.9 26.8 27.0 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. 12.9 13.4 13.0 13.5 16.7 16.8 16.8 16.9 17.0 17.5 17.0 17.5 17.2 17.7 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. 11.2 11.4 14.6 14.8 14.6 14.6 15.7 15.7 17.4 17.6 17.4 17.7 27.8 28.0 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. 9.3 9.5 11.9 12.1 11.1 11.1 11.9 11.9 13.3 13.5 13.3 13.6 20.8 21.0 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. 7.9 8.3 11.2 11.6 11.5 11.6 12.6 12.7 14.2 14.6 14.2 14.6 25.7 26.0 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. 8.6 9.5 12.8 13.7 10.9 11.1 12.4 12.6 14.7 15.5 14.7 15.6 30.2 31.0 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. 5.3 5.6 7.7 8.0 6.5 6.6 7.7 7.8 9.3 9.7 9.3 9.7 17.7 18.0 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. 2.0 2.3 4.0 4.3 2.9 3.0 3.5 3.6 4.4 4.8 4.4 4.8 16.7 17.0 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. 1.6 2.2 2.8 3.4 4.8 5.1 5.0 5.5 5.7 6.2 5.7 6.7 11.9 12.5 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. 2.3 4.1 3.8 5.6 4.8 5.3 5.2 5.8 5.9 7.8 5.9 8.2 12.2 14.0 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. 1.8 2.7 3.8 4.7 2.7 2.9 3.6 3.8 4.9 5.7 4.9 5.8 18.2 19.0 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. 1.4 2.0 2.6 3.2 2.1 2.3 2.5 2.7 3.3 3.9 3.3 4.0 9.4 10.0 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. 0.1 1.3 0.6 1.8 0.7 0.9 0.8 1.0 1.1 2.3 1.1 2.3 20.8 22.0 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. 3.2 4.5 6.0 7.3 4.7 5.1 5.4 5.9 6.9 8.2 6.9 8.5 22.7 24.0 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. 1.2 1.9 2.5 3.2 4.4 4.6 4.8 5.1 5.7 6.4 5.7 6.6 14.3 15.0 1 Source: Coral Mountain Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis, Urban Crossroads, Inc. "EA" = Existing plus Ambient Growth; "EAC" = EA plus Cumulative; "EACSE"= EAC Special Event 12642-10 Noise Study 31 ( URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 6-3: TIME OF DAY VEHICLE SPLITS Vehicle Type Time of Day Splits' Total of Time of Day Splits Daytime Evening Nighttime Autos 77.50% 12.90% 9.60% 100.00% Medium Trucks 84.80% 4.90% 10.30% 100.00% Heavy Trucks 86.50% 2.70% 10.80% 100.00% 1 Source: Typical Southern California vehicle mix. "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; "Evening" = 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. TABLE 6-4: DISTRIBUTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW BY VEHICLE TYPE (VEHICLE MIX) Classification Total % Traffic Flow Total Autos Medium Trucks Heavy Trucks All Roadways' 97.42% 1.84% 0.74% 100.00% 1 Source: Typical Southern California vehicle mix and the County of Riverside Office of Industrial Hygiene. 6.1.2 ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE PREDICTION MODEL INPUTS The on-site roadway parameters including the average daily traffic (ADT) volumes used for this study are presented on Table 6-5. To predict the future on-site noise environment at the Project site, parameters including the number of lanes and daily volume thresholds were obtained from the City of La Quinta General Plan Transportation Element and Coral Mountain Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis. For the purposes of this analysis, soft site conditions were used to analyze the on-site traffic noise impacts for the Project study area. Soft site conditions account for the sound propagation loss over natural surfaces such as normal earth and ground vegetation. Research by Caltrans has shown that the use of soft site conditions is appropriate for the application of the FHWA traffic noise prediction model used in this analysis. (21) TABLE 6-5: ON-SITE ROADWAY PARAMETERS Roadway Lanes Classification'Limit Average Daily Traffic Volume" Speed (mph)2 Site Conditions Avenue 58 4 Secondary Arterial 12,500 45 Soft Madison Street 4 Secondary Arterial 20,000 45 Soft 1 Source: The Wave at Coral Mountain Traffic Impact Analysis General Plan Buildout (2040) 2 Posted speed limit. The site plan is used to identify the relationship between the roadway centerline elevation, the pad elevation and the centerline distance to any intervening noise barriers, and the building facade. The exterior noise level impacts were placed five feet above the finished floor elevation at the outdoor living areas and proposed building fagades. Second -floor receivers were located 14 feet above the finished floor elevation. 12642-10 Noise Study 32 e1 URBAN CRO55ROAD5 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 6.2 VIBRATION ASSESSMENT This analysis focuses on the potential ground -borne vibration associated with vehicular traffic and construction activities. Ground -borne vibration levels from automobile traffic are generally overshadowed by vibration generated by heavy trucks that roll over the same uneven roadway surfaces. However, due to the rapid drop-off rate of ground -borne vibration and the short duration of the associated events, vehicular traffic -induced ground -borne vibration is rarely perceptible beyond the roadway right-of-way, and rarely results in vibration levels that cause damage to buildings in the vicinity. However, while vehicular traffic is rarely perceptible, construction has the potential to result in varying degrees of temporary ground vibration, depending on the specific construction activities and equipment used. Ground vibration levels associated with various types of construction equipment are summarized on Table 6-6. Based on the representative vibration levels presented for various construction equipment types, it is possible to estimate the potential Project construction vibration levels using the following vibration assessment methods defined by the FTA. The FTA provides the following equation: PPVequip = PPVref X (25/D)1.5 TABLE 6-6: VIBRATION SOURCE LEVELS FOR CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT Equipment PPV (in/sec) at 25 feet Small bulldozer 0.003 Jackhammer 0.035 Loaded Trucks 0.076 Large bulldozer 0.089 Source: Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment 12642-10 Noise Study 33 `l URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 34 `�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 7 OFF-SITE TRANSPORTATION NOISE IMPACTS To assess the off-site transportation CNEL noise level impacts associated with development of the proposed Project, noise contours were developed based on Coral Mountain Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis. (2) Noise contour boundaries represent the equal levels of noise exposure and are measured in CNEL from the center of the roadway. Noise contours were developed for the following traffic scenarios: • Existing Without / With Project: This scenario refers to the existing present-day 2019 noise conditions, without and with the development of the full Project (Phase 3). The Existing With Project scenario will not actually occur since the Project would not be fully constructed and operational until Phase 3 2026 conditions. • Existing plus Ambient (EA) Without / With Project: This scenario refers to the existing present- day 2019 noise conditions plus the estimated 7 years of background growth in ambient traffic conditions without and with the development of the full Project (Phase 3). • Existing plus Ambient plus Cumulative (EAC) 2021 Without / With Project: This scenario refers to the existing plus ambient plus cumulative noise conditions at 2021 without and with the proposed Project Phase 1. Project Phase 1 includes the 12 -acre wave basin facility, a 150 -key hotel, 96 multifamily attached dwelling units, 26 single family detached dwelling units, and 10,000 square feet of retail • Existing plus Ambient plus Cumulative (EAC) 2023 Without / With Project: This scenario refers to the existing plus ambient plus cumulative noise conditions at 2023 without and with the proposed Project Phase 2. In addition, to Project Phase 1, Project Phase 2 includes an additional 25,000 square feet of retail for a total of 12 -acre wave basin facility, a 150 -key hotel, 104 multifamily attached dwelling units, 26 single family detached dwelling units, and 35,000 square feet of retail • Existing plus Ambient plus Cumulative (EAC) 2026 Without / With Prosect: This scenario refers to the existing plus ambient plus cumulative noise conditions at 2026 without and with the proposed Project Phase 3. In addition, to Project Phase 1 and 2, Project Phase 3 includes an additional 25,000 square feet of retail and 470 single family detached dwelling units for a total of 12 -acre wave basin facility, a 150 -key hotel, 104 multifamily attached dwelling units, 496 single family detached dwelling units, 60,000 square feet of retail. • Existing plus Ambient plus Cumulative (EAC) 2026 Special Events: This scenario refers to the existing plus ambient plus cumulative plus special events noise conditions at 2026 with the proposed Project Phase 3. The applicant anticipates the potential occurrence of special events at this location involving attendance of not -to -exceed 2,500 guests per day arriving or departing on Saturdays (up to 4 events per year). • General Plan (GP) 2040 Without / With Project: This scenario refers to the future General Plan buildout conditions at Year 2040 without and with the proposed Project. This scenario represents buildout of the General Plan land use and includes all cumulative projects identified in the Traffic Impact Analysis. 12642-10 Noise Study 35 `�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 7.1 TRAFFIC NOISE CONTOURS Noise contours were used to assess the Project's incremental traffic -related noise impacts at land uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic. The noise contours represent the distance to noise levels of a constant value and are measured from the center of the roadway for the 70, 65, and 60 dBA noise levels. The noise contours do not consider the effect of any existing noise barriers or topography that may attenuate ambient noise levels. In addition, because the noise contours reflect modeling of vehicular noise on area roadways, they appropriately do not reflect noise Increase from the surrounding stationary noise sources within the Project study area. Tables 7-1 and 7-14 present a summary of the exterior traffic noise levels for each traffic condition. Appendix 7.1 includes the traffic noise level contours worksheets for each traffic condition. 12642-10 Noise Study 36 [,► URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-1: EXISTING 2019 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 37 e..) URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 71.8 85 182 393 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 70.3 67 145 313 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 69.3 57 123 266 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 65.6 28 59 128 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.3 31 66 142 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 64.4 23 50 107 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 67.6 38 81 175 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 66.2 30 65 139 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 61.5 14 30 64 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.2 36 77 166 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 65.1 30 65 141 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 65.0 25 54 116 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 63.8 21 45 97 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 63.2 19 41 89 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 62.2 16 35 76 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.0 46 100 216 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 68.4 42 91 196 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.1 35 75 162 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 66.9 33 72 155 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 67.3 35 76 165 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.2 26 55 119 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 60.9 13 29 62 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 59.1 10 20 44 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 60.6 12 26 56 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 59.4 12 25 54 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 58.3 10 21 45 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 46.9 1 2 5 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 62.1 15 33 70 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 57.3 9 20 42 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 37 e..) URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-2: EXISTING 2019 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 38 ��► URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 71.9 86 185 398 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 70.5 69 149 322 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 69.6 60 129 278 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 66.0 29 63 135 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.8 33 71 153 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 65.5 27 59 127 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 68.7 44 95 204 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 67.8 38 83 178 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 62.9 17 37 80 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.4 37 80 172 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 65.5 32 69 149 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 65.6 28 59 128 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 64.5 23 50 108 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 64.3 23 49 105 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 62.5 17 37 80 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.2 48 103 221 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 68.5 43 92 199 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.2 36 76 165 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 67.1 35 75 161 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 67.7 38 82 176 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.4 27 57 124 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 61.5 15 32 68 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 60.4 12 25 55 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 63.1 18 38 83 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 61.2 15 33 70 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 59.9 12 27 58 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 58.0 6 14 30 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 63.5 19 41 88 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 59.3 12 27 57 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 38 ��► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-3: EA WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 39 ��► URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 72.7 97 210 452 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.1 76 164 353 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.4 68 146 314 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.5 37 79 170 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.4 43 92 197 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 66.7 32 70 150 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 69.7 52 112 240 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.2 41 88 190 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.1 21 44 96 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.5 37 80 173 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.3 36 78 167 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.4 36 78 168 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 66.7 33 70 152 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 65.8 28 61 131 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.1 25 55 118 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.1 47 101 217 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 50 109 234 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.1 41 89 192 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.4 42 91 196 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.0 46 100 214 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.8 33 71 153 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 63.9 21 46 99 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 61.5 14 30 64 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 62.8 17 36 79 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 62.6 19 41 88 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 61.0 15 32 69 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 54.7 4 8 18 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.8 23 49 107 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 60.5 15 32 69 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 39 ��► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-4: EA WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 40 ��► URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 72.8 99 212 458 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.3 78 168 361 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.6 70 151 325 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.7 38 82 176 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.7 45 96 207 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.4 36 78 167 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 70.4 57 124 266 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 69.3 48 104 224 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.9 23 51 109 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.7 38 83 178 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.6 38 81 175 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.8 38 83 178 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 67.1 35 75 161 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 66.4 31 67 145 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.2 26 56 121 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.2 48 103 222 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 51 110 236 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.2 42 90 194 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.6 43 93 201 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.3 48 104 224 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.9 34 73 157 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 64.2 22 48 104 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 62.3 16 34 73 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.5 22 47 102 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 63.6 22 47 102 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 61.9 17 37 79 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 59.4 8 17 37 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.6 26 56 121 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 61.5 17 38 81 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 40 ��► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-5: EAC 2021 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 41 ��► URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.3 106 228 492 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.8 85 183 394 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.9 73 158 340 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.1 34 74 159 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.6 38 81 175 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 66.7 32 70 150 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 69.3 49 105 225 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.4 43 92 197 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 63.7 19 42 91 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.5 43 93 201 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.7 38 83 178 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.2 35 76 163 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 66.2 30 65 141 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 66.2 30 65 139 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 66.0 29 63 135 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.1 55 119 256 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 50 109 234 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.8 39 85 183 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.5 43 93 200 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.3 42 89 193 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.0 29 63 137 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 62.5 17 37 80 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 63.8 20 43 92 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 63.8 20 43 92 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 61.2 15 33 70 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 60.1 13 28 60 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 55.3 4 9 20 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 63.7 19 42 91 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 62.9 22 47 100 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 41 ��► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-6: EAC 2021 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 42 e..) URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.3 106 229 493 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.9 85 183 395 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.9 74 159 343 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.1 35 75 161 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.7 38 82 176 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 66.8 33 72 154 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 69.5 50 108 232 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.7 45 96 207 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.0 20 44 94 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.5 44 94 202 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.7 39 83 180 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.3 35 76 165 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 66.3 31 66 142 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 66.3 31 66 142 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 66.0 29 63 135 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 55 119 257 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 50 109 234 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.8 39 85 183 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.6 43 93 201 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.4 42 91 195 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.1 30 64 138 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 62.7 18 38 82 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.1 21 44 96 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.3 21 46 98 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 61.5 16 34 74 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 60.5 14 29 63 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 56.4 5 11 23 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.1 21 44 96 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 63.1 22 48 103 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 42 e..) URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-7: EAC 2023 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 43 e..) URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.5 110 237 510 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.0 88 189 406 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.2 77 166 357 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.5 37 79 171 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.3 42 89 193 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.3 35 76 165 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 69.8 52 112 242 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.8 45 97 209 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.3 21 46 99 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.6 44 95 205 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.1 41 88 189 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.0 40 86 186 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 67.6 37 80 172 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 67.5 37 79 170 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 67.6 37 80 172 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 55 119 257 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.9 53 114 246 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.1 41 89 192 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.9 46 99 212 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.8 45 97 210 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.8 33 71 153 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 63.4 19 42 90 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.0 20 44 94 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.2 21 45 97 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 62.4 18 40 85 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 60.8 14 31 67 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 55.9 5 10 21 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.3 21 46 99 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 63.3 23 49 106 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 43 e..) URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-8: EAC 2023 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 44 ��► URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.5 110 237 511 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.1 88 189 407 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.2 78 167 360 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.6 37 80 172 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.3 42 90 194 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.4 36 78 168 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 70.0 54 116 249 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 69.2 47 102 220 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.6 22 48 104 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.6 44 96 206 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.1 41 88 190 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.1 40 87 187 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 67.6 37 80 173 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 67.6 37 80 173 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 67.6 37 80 172 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 56 120 258 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.9 53 114 246 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.1 41 89 192 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 69.0 46 99 213 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.9 46 99 212 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.8 33 72 154 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 63.5 20 43 92 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.4 22 47 101 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.6 22 48 104 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 62.6 19 41 88 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 61.2 15 33 70 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 56.9 5 12 25 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.7 23 49 105 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 63.6 24 51 111 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 44 ��► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-9: EAC 2026 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 45 ��► URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.9 116 249 537 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.4 92 198 426 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.6 82 176 380 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 68.2 41 89 191 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.2 47 102 220 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.1 40 87 187 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 70.5 58 126 271 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 69.5 50 107 231 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.2 24 53 113 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.8 46 98 211 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.6 44 95 204 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 69.0 46 100 216 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 68.9 46 99 212 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 68.7 44 95 205 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 68.9 46 99 212 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 56 120 259 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 70.3 57 122 263 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.6 44 96 206 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 69.4 50 107 230 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.6 51 109 235 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 67.6 37 80 173 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 64.3 23 49 105 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.6 22 48 103 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.7 23 49 105 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 63.7 23 49 105 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 62.0 17 37 81 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 57.3 6 12 26 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.4 25 54 117 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 64.0 26 55 119 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 45 ��► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-10: EAC 2026 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 46 ��► URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.9 117 252 542 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.5 94 201 434 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.8 84 181 389 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 68.4 43 92 197 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.4 49 106 228 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.6 44 94 202 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 71.1 64 137 295 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 70.3 57 122 263 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.8 27 58 125 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.9 47 100 216 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.8 46 98 211 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 69.2 48 104 223 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 69.2 47 102 220 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 69.1 47 101 218 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 69.0 46 100 214 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.3 57 123 264 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 70.4 57 123 265 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.7 45 97 208 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 69.6 50 109 234 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.8 52 113 244 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 67.8 38 83 178 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 64.7 24 52 112 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.9 23 51 109 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 65.9 27 59 127 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 64.4 25 54 116 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 62.8 19 42 90 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 60.5 9 20 43 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.2 28 61 131 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 64.5 28 60 129 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 46 ��► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-11: EAC 2026 WITHOUT PROJECT WITHOUT SPECIAL EVENTS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 47 ��► URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.9 116 249 537 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.4 92 198 426 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.6 82 176 380 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 68.2 41 89 191 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.2 47 102 220 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.1 40 87 187 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 70.5 58 126 271 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 69.5 50 107 231 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.2 24 53 113 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.8 46 98 211 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.6 44 95 204 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 69.0 46 100 216 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 68.9 46 99 212 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 68.7 44 95 205 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 68.9 46 99 212 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 56 120 259 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 70.3 57 122 263 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.6 44 96 206 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 69.4 50 107 230 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.6 51 109 235 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 67.6 37 80 173 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 64.3 23 49 105 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.6 22 48 103 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.7 23 49 105 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 63.7 23 49 105 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 62.0 17 37 81 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 57.3 6 12 26 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.4 25 54 117 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 64.0 26 55 119 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 47 ��► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-12: EAC 2026 WITH PROJECT WITH SPECIAL EVENTS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 48 ��► URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.9 117 252 542 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.5 94 201 434 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.8 84 181 390 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 68.4 43 92 197 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.4 49 106 228 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.6 44 94 203 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 71.1 64 138 298 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 70.5 58 125 269 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 66.0 28 59 128 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.9 47 100 216 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.8 46 98 211 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 69.2 48 104 223 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 69.2 47 102 220 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 69.1 47 102 219 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 69.0 46 100 216 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.3 57 123 264 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 70.4 57 124 266 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.7 45 97 209 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 69.6 50 109 234 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.8 53 114 245 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 67.8 38 83 178 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 64.7 24 52 112 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 65.3 25 53 115 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 66.2 28 61 131 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 64.5 25 54 117 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 62.9 20 42 92 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 60.5 9 20 43 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.3 29 62 134 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 64.7 28 61 131 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 48 ��► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-13: GENERAL PLAN 2040 WITHOUT PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 49 ��► URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 75.4 146 314 676 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 73.6 111 239 515 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 73.3 106 229 494 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 71.4 67 145 312 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 73.0 86 185 398 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 71.7 70 150 323 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 74.2 103 222 477 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 72.8 83 180 387 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 69.8 49 107 230 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 68.2 48 104 224 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.2 57 123 264 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 72.9 84 181 389 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 73.3 89 192 414 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 71.9 72 155 334 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 72.2 76 163 351 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.3 56 121 261 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 72.4 77 167 360 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 69.6 60 129 278 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 72.0 74 158 341 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 72.7 82 176 380 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.4 57 124 266 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 70.1 55 119 256 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 67.8 36 78 168 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 67.9 37 79 171 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 69.4 54 117 251 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 66.6 35 75 162 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 70.1 40 87 188 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.6 56 120 259 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 68.0 47 102 220 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 49 ��► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-14: GENERAL PLAN 2040 WITH PROJECT CONDITIONS NOISE CONTOURS 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 50 ��► URBAN Road Segment AdID and U n i Land Use CNEL at Nearest Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Distance to Contour from Centerline (Feet) 70 dBA CNEL 65 dBA CNEL 60 dBA CNEL 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 75.4 147 316 680 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 73.7 113 243 522 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 73.4 108 233 502 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 71.5 68 147 317 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 73.1 87 187 403 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 71.9 72 156 335 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 74.4 107 230 496 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 73.2 89 191 411 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 70.0 51 110 238 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 68.3 49 106 229 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.4 58 126 271 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 73.0 85 183 395 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 73.4 90 195 419 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 72.1 74 160 344 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 72.2 76 164 353 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.4 57 124 266 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 72.4 78 168 361 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 69.6 60 130 280 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 72.1 74 160 344 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 72.8 83 180 387 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.5 58 125 269 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 70.2 56 120 259 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 68.0 37 81 174 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 68.5 40 87 187 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 69.6 56 120 259 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 66.8 36 78 169 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 70.3 42 90 195 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.8 58 125 268 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 68.2 49 105 227 1 Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2 The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the adjacent land use. "RW" = Location of the respective noise contour falls within the right-of-way of the road. "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 50 ��► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 7.2 EXISTING CONDITIONS PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE This analysis relies on a comparative review of the off-site traffic noise level increases, without and with project ADT traffic volumes from the Project traffic study. Using the incremental off- site traffic noise significance criteria outlined in Section 4, the impacts on nearby study area roadway segments for all the with the Project traffic conditions are evaluated. The incremental relative significance criteria identify potential impacts if the ambient noise environment is quiet (<60 dBA) and the new noise source greatly increases the noise levels by a readily perceptible 5 dBA or greater. In areas where the without project noise levels range from 60 to 65 dBA, a 3 dBA barely perceptible noise level increase is used and when the without project noise levels already exceed 65 dBA, any increase in community noise louder than 1.5 dBA or greater is considered a significant impact. An analysis of existing traffic noise levels plus traffic noise generated by the proposed Project has been included in this report for informational purposes. However, the analysis of existing traffic noise levels plus traffic noise generated by the proposed Project scenario will not actually occur since the Project would not be fully constructed (Phase 1, 2 & 3) and operational until year 2026 cumulative conditions. Table 7-1 presents the Existing without Project conditions CNEL noise levels. The without Project exterior noise levels are expected to range from 46.9 to 71.8 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such as noise barriers or topography. Table 7-2 shows the Existing with Project conditions will range from 58.0 to 71.9 dBA CNEL. As shown on Table 7-15 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 11.1 dBA CNEL on the study area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the Project - related noise level increases are considered potentially significant under Existing with Project conditions at the following two roadway segments: • Madison Street north of Avenue 58 (Segment 8) • Avenue 60 west of Madison Street (Segment 27) All other roadway segments are shown to experience less than significant noise level impacts under Existing plus Project conditions. However, this scenario is provided solely for analytical purposes and will not occur, since the Project will not be full developed (Phase 1, 2 & 3) and occupied under Existing 2019 conditions. Therefore, no mitigation measures are considered to reduce the Existing with Project condition traffic noise level increases, and impacts are considered less than significant since they will not actually occur. 12642-10 Noise Study 51 [,► URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-15: EXISTING 2019 OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ID Road Segment Adjacent Land Use' IProject CNEL at Adjacent Land Use (dBA)Z Off -Site Traffic Noise Threshold' Threshold Exceeded?' No With Project Project Addition 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 71.8 71.9 0.1 1.5 No 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 70.3 70.5 0.2 1.5 No 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 69.3 69.6 0.3 1.5 No 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 65.6 66.0 0.4 1.5 No 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.3 66.8 0.5 1.5 No 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 64.4 65.5 1.1 3.0 No 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 67.6 68.7 1.1 1.5 No 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 66.2 67.8 1.6 1.5 Yes 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 61.5 62.9 1.4 3.0 No 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.2 66.4 0.2 1.5 No 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 65.1 65.5 0.4 1.5 No 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 65.0 65.6 0.6 1.5 No 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 63.8 64.5 0.7 3.0 No 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 63.2 64.3 1.1 3.0 No 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 62.2 62.5 0.3 3.0 No 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.0 69.2 0.2 1.5 No 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 68.4 68.5 0.1 1.5 No 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.1 66.2 0.1 1.5 No 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 66.9 67.1 0.2 1.5 No 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 67.3 67.7 0.4 1.5 No 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.2 65.4 0.2 1.5 No 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 60.9 61.5 0.6 3.0 No 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 59.1 60.4 1.3 5.0 No 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 60.6 63.1 2.5 3.0 No 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 59.4 61.2 1.8 5.0 No 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 58.3 59.9 1.6 5.0 No 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 46.9 58.0 11.1 5.0 Yes 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 62.1 63.5 1.4 3.0 No 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 57.3 59.3 2.0 5.0 No 'Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use. 3 Significance Criteria (Section 4). "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 52 `�► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 7.3 EA PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE Table 7-3 presents the EA without Project conditions CNEL noise levels which are expected to range from 54.7 to 72.7 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such as noise barriers or topography. Table 7-4 shows the EA with Project conditions will range from 59.4 to 72.8 dBA CNEL. As shown on Table 7-16 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 4.7 dBA CNEL on the study area roadway segments. However, this scenario is provided solely for analytical purposes and will not occur, since the Project will not be full developed (Phase 1, 2 & 3) and occupied under EA with Project conditions. Therefore, no mitigation measures are considered to reduce the EA with Project condition traffic noise level increases, and impacts are considered less than significant since they will not actually occur. 12642-10 Noise Study 53 [,► URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-16: EA OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ID Road Segment Adjacent Land Use' CNEL at Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Off -Site Traffic Noise Threshold' Threshold Exceeded?' No Project With Project Project Addition 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 72.7 72.8 0.1 1.5 No 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.1 71.3 0.2 1.5 No 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.4 70.6 0.2 1.5 No 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.5 67.7 0.2 1.5 No 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.4 68.7 0.3 1.5 No 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 66.7 67.4 0.7 1.5 No 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 69.7 70.4 0.7 1.5 No 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.2 69.3 1.1 1.5 No 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.1 64.9 0.8 3.0 No 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 66.5 66.7 0.2 1.5 No 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.3 66.6 0.3 1.5 No 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.4 67.8 0.4 1.5 No 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 66.7 67.1 0.4 1.5 No 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 65.8 66.4 0.6 1.5 No 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.1 65.2 0.1 1.5 No 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 69.1 69.2 0.1 1.5 No 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 69.6 0.0 1.5 No 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.1 67.2 0.1 1.5 No 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.4 68.6 0.2 1.5 No 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.0 69.3 0.3 1.5 No 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.8 66.9 0.1 1.5 No 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 63.9 64.2 0.3 3.0 No 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 61.5 62.3 0.8 3.0 No 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 62.8 64.5 1.7 3.0 No 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 62.6 63.6 1.0 3.0 No 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 61.0 61.9 0.9 3.0 No 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 54.7 59.4 4.7 5.0 No 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.8 65.6 0.8 3.0 No 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 60.5 61.5 1.0 3.0 No 'Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use. 3 Significance Criteria (Section 4). "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 54 `�► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 7.4 EAC 2021 PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE Table 7-5 presents the EAC 2021 without Project conditions CNEL noise levels are expected to range from 55.3 to 73.3 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such as noise barriers or topography. Table 7-6 shows the EAC 2021 with Project conditions will range from 56.4 to 73.3 dBA CNEL. As shown on Table 7-17 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 1.1 dBA CNEL on the study area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the Project -related noise level increases are considered less than significant under EAC 2021 with Project conditions at the land uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic. 12642-10 Noise Study 55 [,1 URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-17: EAC 2021 OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ID Road Segment Adjacent Land Use' CNEL at Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Off -Site Traffic Noise Threshold' Threshold Exceeded?' No Project With Project Project Addition 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.3 73.3 0.0 1.5 No 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 71.8 71.9 0.1 1.5 No 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 70.9 70.9 0.0 1.5 No 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.1 67.1 0.0 1.5 No 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.6 67.7 0.1 1.5 No 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 66.7 66.8 0.1 1.5 No 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 69.3 69.5 0.2 1.5 No 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.4 68.7 0.3 1.5 No 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 63.7 64.0 0.3 3.0 No 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.5 67.5 0.0 1.5 No 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 66.7 66.7 0.0 1.5 No 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.2 67.3 0.1 1.5 No 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 66.2 66.3 0.1 1.5 No 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 66.2 66.3 0.1 1.5 No 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 66.0 66.0 0.0 1.5 No 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.1 70.2 0.1 1.5 No 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.6 69.6 0.0 1.5 No 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 66.8 66.8 0.0 1.5 No 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.5 68.6 0.1 1.5 No 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.3 68.4 0.1 1.5 No 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.0 66.1 0.1 1.5 No 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 62.5 62.7 0.2 3.0 No 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 63.8 64.1 0.3 3.0 No 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 63.8 64.3 0.5 3.0 No 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 61.2 61.5 0.3 3.0 No 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 60.1 60.5 0.4 3.0 No 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 55.3 56.4 1.1 5.0 No 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 63.7 64.1 0.4 3.0 No 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 62.9 63.1 0.2 3.0 No 'Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use. 3 Significance Criteria (Section 4). "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 56 `�► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 7.5 EAC 2023 PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE Table 7-7 presents the EAC 2023 without Project conditions CNEL noise levels are expected to range from 55.9 to 73.5 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such as noise barriers or topography. Table 7-8 shows the EAC 2023 with Project conditions will range from 56.9 to 73.5 dBA CNEL. As shown on Table 7-18 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 1.0 dBA CNEL on the study area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the Project -related noise level increases are considered less than significant under EAC 2023 with Project conditions at the land uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic. 12642-10 Noise Study 57 `�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-18: EAC 2023 OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ID Road Segment Adjacent Land Use' CNEL at Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Off -Site Traffic Noise Threshold' Threshold Exceeded?' No Project With Project Project Addition 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.5 73.5 0.0 1.5 No 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.0 72.1 0.1 1.5 No 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.2 71.2 0.0 1.5 No 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 67.5 67.6 0.1 1.5 No 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 68.3 68.3 0.0 1.5 No 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 67.3 67.4 0.1 1.5 No 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 69.8 70.0 0.2 1.5 No 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 68.8 69.2 0.4 1.5 No 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 64.3 64.6 0.3 3.0 No 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.6 67.6 0.0 1.5 No 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.1 67.1 0.0 1.5 No 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.0 68.1 0.1 1.5 No 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 67.6 67.6 0.0 1.5 No 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 67.5 67.6 0.1 1.5 No 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 67.6 67.6 0.0 1.5 No 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 70.2 0.0 1.5 No 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 69.9 69.9 0.0 1.5 No 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.1 67.1 0.0 1.5 No 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 68.9 69.0 0.1 1.5 No 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 68.8 68.9 0.1 1.5 No 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 66.8 66.8 0.0 1.5 No 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 63.4 63.5 0.1 3.0 No 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.0 64.4 0.4 3.0 No 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.2 64.6 0.4 3.0 No 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 62.4 62.6 0.2 3.0 No 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 60.8 61.2 0.4 3.0 No 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 55.9 56.9 1.0 5.0 No 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 64.3 64.7 0.4 3.0 No 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 63.3 63.6 0.3 3.0 No 'Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use. 3 Significance Criteria (Section 4). "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 58 `�► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 7.6 EAC 2026 PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE Table 7-9 presents the EAC 2026 without Project conditions CNEL noise levels are expected to range from 57.3 to 73.9 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such as noise barriers or topography. Table 7-10 shows the EAC 2026 with Project conditions will range from 60.5 to 73.9 dBA CNEL. As shown on Table 7-19 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 3.2 dBA CNEL on the study area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the Project - related noise level increases are considered Tess than significant under EAC 2026 with Project conditions at the land uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic. 12642-10 Noise Study 59 ce URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-19: EAC 2026 OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ID Road Segment Adjacent Land Use' CNEL at Adjacent Land Use (dBA)2 Off -Site Traffic Noise Threshold' Threshold Exceeded?' No Project With Project Project Addition 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.9 73.9 0.0 1.5 No 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.4 72.5 0.1 1.5 No 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.6 71.8 0.2 1.5 No 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 68.2 68.4 0.2 1.5 No 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.2 69.4 0.2 1.5 No 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.1 68.6 0.5 1.5 No 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 70.5 71.1 0.6 1.5 No 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 69.5 70.3 0.8 1.5 No 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.2 65.8 0.6 1.5 No 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.8 67.9 0.1 1.5 No 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.6 67.8 0.2 1.5 No 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 69.0 69.2 0.2 1.5 No 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 68.9 69.2 0.3 1.5 No 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 68.7 69.1 0.4 1.5 No 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 68.9 69.0 0.1 1.5 No 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 70.3 0.1 1.5 No 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 70.3 70.4 0.1 1.5 No 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.6 67.7 0.1 1.5 No 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 69.4 69.6 0.2 1.5 No 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.6 69.8 0.2 1.5 No 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 67.6 67.8 0.2 1.5 No 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 64.3 64.7 0.4 3.0 No 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.6 64.9 0.3 3.0 No 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.7 65.9 1.2 3.0 No 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 63.7 64.4 0.7 3.0 No 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 62.0 62.8 0.8 3.0 No 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 57.3 60.5 3.2 5.0 No 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.4 66.2 0.8 1.5 No 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 64.0 64.5 0.5 3.0 No 'Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use. 3 Significance Criteria (Section 4). "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 60 `�► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 7.7 EAC 2026 PROJECT SPECIAL EVENTS TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE Table 7-11 presents the EAC 2026 without Project conditions CNEL noise levels are expected to range from 57.3 to 73.9 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such as noise barriers or topography. The applicant anticipates the potential occurrence of special events at this location involving attendance of not -to -exceed 2,500 guests per day arriving or departing on Saturdays (up to 4 events per year). Table 7-12 shows the EAC 2026 with Project with Special Event conditions will range from 60.5 to 73.9 dBA CNEL. As shown on Table 7-20 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 3.2 dBA CNEL on the study area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the Project -related noise level increases are considered Tess than significant under EAC 2026 with Project Special Event conditions at the land uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic. 12642-10 Noise Study 61 `�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-20: EAC 2026 SPECIAL EVENT OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ID Road Segment Adjacent Land Use' IProject CNEL at Adjacent Land Use (dBA)Z Off -Site Traffic Noise Threshold' Threshold Exceeded?' No With Project Project Addition 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 73.9 73.9 0.0 1.5 No 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 72.4 72.5 0.1 1.5 No 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 71.6 71.8 0.2 1.5 No 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 68.2 68.4 0.2 1.5 No 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.2 69.4 0.2 1.5 No 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 68.1 68.6 0.5 1.5 No 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 70.5 71.1 0.6 1.5 No 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 69.5 70.5 1.0 1.5 No 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 65.2 66.0 0.8 1.5 No 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 67.8 67.9 0.1 1.5 No 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 67.6 67.8 0.2 1.5 No 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 69.0 69.2 0.2 1.5 No 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 68.9 69.2 0.3 1.5 No 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 68.7 69.1 0.4 1.5 No 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 68.9 69.0 0.1 1.5 No 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.2 70.3 0.1 1.5 No 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 70.3 70.4 0.1 1.5 No 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 67.6 67.7 0.1 1.5 No 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 69.4 69.6 0.2 1.5 No 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 69.6 69.8 0.2 1.5 No 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 67.6 67.8 0.2 1.5 No 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 64.3 64.7 0.4 3.0 No 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 64.6 65.3 0.7 3.0 No 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 64.7 66.2 1.5 3.0 No 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 63.7 64.5 0.8 3.0 No 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 62.0 62.9 0.9 3.0 No 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 57.3 60.5 3.2 5.0 No 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 65.4 66.3 0.9 1.5 No 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 64.0 64.7 0.7 3.0 No 'Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use. 3 Significance Criteria (Section 4). "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 62 `�► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 7.8 GENERAL PLAN 2040 PROJECT TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL INCREASE Table 7-13 presents the General Plan 2040 without Project conditions CNEL noise levels are expected to range from 66.6 to 75.4 dBA CNEL, without accounting for any noise attenuation features such as noise barriers or topography. Table 7-14 shows the General Plan 2040 with Project conditions will range from 66.8 to 75.4 dBA CNEL. As shown on Table 7-21 the Project will generate a noise level increase of up to 0.6 dBA CNEL on the study area roadway segments. Based on the significance criteria in Section 4, the Project -related noise level increases are considered less than significant under General Plan 2040 with Project conditions at the land uses adjacent to roadways conveying Project traffic. 12642-10 Noise Study 63 ce URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 7-21: GENERAL PLAN 2040 OFF-SITE PROJECT -RELATED TRAFFIC NOISE IMPACTS ID Road Segment Adjacent Land Use' IProject CNEL at Adjacent Land Use (dBA)Z Off -Site Traffic Noise Threshold' Threshold Exceeded?' No With Project Project Addition 1 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 50 GC/LDR 75.4 75.4 0.0 1.5 No 2 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR/MHR/OS/GC 73.6 73.7 0.1 1.5 No 3 Jefferson St. n/o Avenue 54 MHR/OS 73.3 73.4 0.1 1.5 No 4 Madison St. n/o Avenue 50 Festival District 71.4 71.5 0.1 1.5 No 5 Madison St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 73.0 73.1 0.1 1.5 No 6 Madison St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 71.7 71.9 0.2 1.5 No 7 Madison St. n/o Airport BI. LDR/OS 74.2 74.4 0.2 1.5 No 8 Madison St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/OS 72.8 73.2 0.4 1.5 No 9 Madison St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 69.8 70.0 0.2 1.5 No 10 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 50 LDR 68.2 68.3 0.1 1.5 No 11 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 52 LDR 69.2 69.4 0.2 1.5 No 12 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 54 LDR 72.9 73.0 0.1 1.5 No 13 Monroe St. n/o Airport BI. LDR 73.3 73.4 0.1 1.5 No 14 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 58 LDR/GC 71.9 72.1 0.2 1.5 No 15 Monroe St. n/o Avenue 60 LDR/GC 72.2 72.2 0.0 1.5 No 16 Avenue 50 w/o Jefferson St. LDR/GC 70.3 70.4 0.1 1.5 No 17 Avenue 50 w/o Madison St. LDR/GC 72.4 72.4 0.0 1.5 No 18 Avenue 50 e/o Monroe St. LDR 69.6 69.6 0.0 1.5 No 19 Avenue 52 w/o Monroe St. GC/OS 72.0 72.1 0.1 1.5 No 20 Avenue 54 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR/GC/OS 72.7 72.8 0.1 1.5 No 21 Avenue 54 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.4 70.5 0.1 1.5 No 22 Airport BI. w/o Monroe St. LDR/OS 70.1 70.2 0.1 1.5 No 23 Avenue 58 w/o Madison St. LDR/MHR 67.8 68.0 0.2 1.5 No 24 Avenue 58 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MCF 67.9 68.5 0.6 1.5 No 25 Avenue 58 w/o Jackson St. LDR 69.4 69.6 0.2 1.5 No 26 Avenue 58 e/o Jackson St. LDR 66.6 66.8 0.2 1.5 No 27 Avenue 60 w/o Madison St. LDR 70.1 70.3 0.2 1.5 No 28 Avenue 60 w/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR/OS 70.6 70.8 0.2 1.5 No 29 Avenue 60 e/o Monroe St. LDR/MHR 68.0 68.2 0.2 1.5 No 'Sources: City of La Quinta, City of Indio and County of Riverside General Plan Land Use Map. 2The CNEL is calculated at the boundary of the right-of-way of each roadway and the property line of the nearest adjacent land use. 3 Significance Criteria (Section 4). "LDR" = Low Density Residential; "MHR" = Medium/High Density Residential; "GC" = General Commercial; "MCF" = Major Community Facility; "OS" = Open Space 12642-10 Noise Study 64 `�► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 8 ON-SITE TRANSPORTATION NOISE IMPACTS An on-site exterior noise impact analysis has been completed to determine the noise exposure levels that would result from adjacent traffic noise sources in the Project study area, and to identify potential noise abatement measures that would achieve acceptable Project exterior and interior noise levels. Exterior noise levels are generally limited to outdoor living areas of frequent human use (e.g., backyards of single-family homes). Interior noise levels are evaluated at the first and second floor building facade. The primary source of traffic noise affecting the Project site is anticipated to be from Avenue 58 and Madison Street. The Project will also experience some background traffic noise impacts from its internal streets and parking lots, however, due to the low traffic volume and low speeds of vehicles travelling on these roadways, traffic noise will not make a significant contribution to the noise environment beyond of the right-of-way of each road. 8.1 EXTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS Using the FHWA traffic noise prediction model and the parameters outlined in Tables 6-3 to 6-5, the expected future exterior noise levels for the on-site building were calculated. Table 8-1 presents a summary of future exterior noise levels for the future low-density residential development within Planning Area II. The on-site exterior traffic noise levels indicate that the single-family residential development adjacent to Avenue 58 and Madison Street will experience exterior noise levels ranging from 66.7 to 68.8 dBA CNEL. TABLE 8-1: EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS Receiver Location Roadway Exterior Noise Level (dBA CNEL)1 Exterior Noise Level Threshold (dBA CNEL)Z Threshold Exceeded? Planning Area II-LDR Avenue 58 66.7 65 Yes Madison Street 68.8 65 Yes 1 On-site traffic noise calculations included in Appendix 8.1. z City of La Quinta exterior noise criteria (See Section 4). To satisfy the City of La Quinta 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standards for residential land use, the construction of 6 -foot -high noise barriers is required for the private outdoor living areas (backyards) of single-family residential uses adjacent to Avenue 58 and Madison Street in Planning Area II. With the recommended noise barriers shown on Exhibit ES -A, the future exterior noise levels at the outdoor living areas (backyards) of single-family residential uses in Planning Area II will be reduced to levels ranging from 57.4 to 59.4 dBA CNEL as shown on Table 8-2. 12642-10 Noise Study 65 [ ,0 URBAN CRO55ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 8-2: EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE LEVELS WITH NOISE ABATEMENT MEASURES Receiver Location Roadway Exterior Noise Level (dBA CNEL)' Exterior Noise Level Threshold (dBA CNEL)2 Threshold Exceeded? Barrier Height (Feet) Planning Area II-LDR Avenue 58 57.4 65 No 6.0 Madison Street 59.4 65 No 6.0 On-site traffic noise calculations included in Appendix 8.1 2 City of La Quinta exterior noise criteria (See Section 4). With the recommended noise barriers shown on Exhibit ES -A, the future exterior noise levels represent a less than significant noise impact. This noise analysis shows that the recommended noise barriers will satisfy the City of La Quinta 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level standards at the outdoor living areas of frequent human use (e.g., backyards of single-family homes). The effective noise barrier height represents the minimum wall and/or berm combination height to satisfy the City of La Quinta exterior noise level standards. The on-site exterior traffic noise analysis calculations are provided in Appendix 8.1. 8.2 INTERIOR NOISE ANALYSIS To ensure that the interior noise levels comply with the City of La Quinta interior noise level standards, future noise levels were calculated at the first and second floor building facade locations. 8.2.1 NOISE REDUCTION METHODOLOGY The interior noise level is the difference between the predicted exterior noise level at the building facade and the noise reduction of the structure. Typical building construction will provide a Noise Reduction (NR) of approximately 12 dBA with "windows open" and a minimum 25 dBA noise reduction with "windows closed." (23) (6) However, sound leaks, cracks and openings within the window assembly can greatly diminish its effectiveness in reducing noise. Several methods are used to improve interior noise reduction, including: (1) weather-stripped solid core exterior doors; (2) upgraded dual glazed windows; (3) mechanical ventilation/air conditioning; and (4) exterior wall/roof assembles free of cut outs or openings. 8.2.2 INTERIOR NOISE LEVEL ASSESSMENT Table 8-3 shows that the Project buildings will require a windows -closed condition and a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g., air conditioning). Table 8-3 shows that the future exterior noise levels at the building facades are expected to range from 59.5 to 66.2 dBA CNEL. The interior noise level analysis shows that the City of La Quinta 45 dBA CNEL residential interior noise standards can be satisfied using standard building construction and windows with standard STC ratings of 27 for all lots/units. Therefore, the future on-site interior traffic noise impacts will be less than significant. 12642-10 Noise Study 66 `l URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 8-3: INTERIOR NOISE LEVELS (CNEL) Building (Facade) Floor Noise Level at Facade' Required Interior NRZ Minimum Estimated Interior NR3 Upgraded Windows' Interior Noise Levels Threshold Threshold Exceeded? Avenue 58 1 56.3 11.3 25 No 31.3 45 No 2 65.5 20.5 25 No 40.5 45 No Madison St. 1 58.3 13.3 25 No 33.3 45 No 2 67.5 22.5 25 No 42.5 45 No 1 Exterior noise level at the facade with a windows closed condition requiring a means of mechanical ventilation (e.g. air conditioning). 2 Noise reduction required to satisfy the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard for residential uses. 3 Estimated minimum interior noise reduction with the recommended windows and standard building construction. 4 Does the required interior noise reduction trigger upgraded windows with a minimum STC rating of greater than 27? Estimated interior noise level with minimum STC rating for all windows. "NR" = Noise Reduction 12642-10 Noise Study 67 `�► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 68 `�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 9 SENSITIVE RECEIVER LOCATIONS To assess the potential for long-term operational and short-term construction noise impacts, the following sensitive receiver locations, as shown on Exhibit 8-A, were identified as representative locations for analysis. Sensitive receivers are generally defined as locations where people reside or where the presence of unwanted sound could otherwise adversely affect the use of the land. Noise -sensitive land uses are generally considered to include schools, hospitals, single-family dwellings, mobile home parks, churches, libraries, and recreation areas. Moderately noise - sensitive land uses typically include multi -family dwellings, hotels, motels, dormitories, out- patient clinics, cemeteries, golf courses, country clubs, athletic/tennis clubs, and equestrian clubs. Land uses that are considered relatively insensitive to noise include business, commercial, and professional developments. Land uses that are typically not affected by noise include: industrial, manufacturing, utilities, agriculture, undeveloped land, parking lots, warehousing, liquid and solid waste facilities, salvage yards, and transit terminals. Receivers are located in outdoor living areas (e.g., backyards) at 10 feet from any existing or proposed barriers or at the building facade, whichever is closer to the Project site, based on FHWA guidance, and consistent with additional guidance provided by Caltrans and the FTA, as previously described in Section 5.2. Sensitive receiver locations in the Project study area include the nearby residential uses, as described below. Other sensitive land uses in the Project study area that are located at greater distances than those identified in this noise study will experience lower noise levels than those presented in this report due to the additional attenuation from distance and the shielding of intervening structures. R1: Located approximately 154 feet north of the Project site, R1 represents existing residential homes north of 58th Avenue. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L1, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R2: Location R2 represents the existing residential homes located north of the Project site at roughly 181 feet, on the north side of 58th Avenue. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L2, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R3: Location R3 represents the existing residential homes northeast of the intersection at 58th Avenue and Madison Street at approximately 231 feet from the Project site. A 24- hour noise measurement near this location, L3, is used to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R4: Location R4 represents the existing residential homes southeast of the intersection at 58th Avenue and Madison Street at approximately 185 feet from the Project site. A 24- hour noise measurement near this location, L4, is used to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R5: Location R5 represents the existing residential homes on the east side of Madison Street at approximately 352 feet from the Project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L5, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R6: Location R6 represents the existing residential home located north of Calle Conchita about 134 feet from the project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L6, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. 12642-10 Noise Study 69 Co URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis R7: Location R7 represents the existing residential homes located north of Avenue 60 about 37 feet from the project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L7, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R8: Location R8 represents the existing residential homes located south of Avenue 60 about 38 feet from the project site. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L8, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R9: Location R9 represents the existing residential homes located about 1,451 feet west of the Project site along Quarry Ranch Road. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L9, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. R10: Location R10 represents the existing residential homes located about 1,378 feet northwest of the Project site north of 58th Avenue. A 24-hour noise measurement was taken near this location, L10, to describe the existing ambient noise environment. 12642-10 Noise Study 70 [,1 URBAN CRO55ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis EXHIBIT 9-A: RECEIVER LOCATIONS LEGEND: W3 Receiver Locations —it Distance from receiver to Project site boundary (in feet) Existing 6 -Foot High Barrier 12642-10 Noise Study 71 [�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 72 `�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 10 OPERATIONAL NOISE IMPACTS This section analyzes the potential stationary -source operational noise impacts at the nearby receiver locations, identified in Section 9, resulting from operation of the proposed Coral Mountain Specific Plan Project. Exhibit 10-A identifies the representative off-site receiver locations, on-site receiver locations and noise source locations used to assess the operational noise levels. Appendix 10.1 includes the detailed calculations for the Project operational noise levels presented in this section. 10.1 REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS To estimate the Project operational noise impacts, reference noise level measurements were collected from similar types of activities to represent the noise levels expected with the development of the proposed Project. This section provides a detailed description of the reference noise level measurements shown on Table 10-1 used to estimate the Project operational noise impacts. It is important to note that the following projected noise levels assume the worst-case noise environment with the wave basin/wave machine activity, outdoor pool/spa activity, outdoor activity, and neighborhood commercial land use activity all operating simultaneously. These noise level impacts will likely vary throughout the day. The operational noise sources will be limited to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. with no planned nighttime activity. 10.1.1 WAVE BASIN/WAVE MACHINE ACTIVITY To describe the wave basin/wave machine activity, Urban Crossroads, Inc. collected reference noise level measurements at the existing Surf Ranch located at 18556 Jackson Avenue in the City of Lemoore, California. The Surf Ranch is a private facility with a proprietary wave machine technology capable of generating waves every 3 to 4 minutes. To create each wave, a large "sled" is pulled through the water using a cable system on metal rollers. Two buildings at each end of the cable system house the mechanical equipment and cable system. To measure the noise levels associated with the wave machine, Urban Crossroads, Inc. collected reference noise level measurements at eight different locations around the Surf Ranch. The noise level measurement locations were selected to identify the unique noise characteristics associated with different stages of each wave. Prior to each wave, the control tower announces the event over the public address system. This is followed by the noise generated from the movement of the sled and an increase in noise levels from the mechanical equipment buildings. As the sled moves through the lagoon, noise from the cable and metal rollers is clearly audible. However, throughout each wave event, the primary noise source is simply the movement of water from each wave in the lagoon. Over a period of 53 minutes, ten wave events were measured at eight different locations on April 13, 2020. The reference noise levels suggest that during peak wave events, the Wave basin generates noise levels ranging from 62.6 dBA Leq at end of the lagoon, 73.8 dBA Leq in the lifeguard tower and 75.7 dBA Leq near the cable roller system. 12642-10 Noise Study 73 [,► URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis EXHIBIT 1O -A: OPERATIONAL NOISE SOURCE AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS Planning Area n Future Low Density Residential (3) Planning Area if 'Kow Densly Residential (5) `� Planning Area 11 Future low Density Residenlial (2) e Planning Area 111 cr` Fiera, (3y 'II� " Planning Area II Future Low Densitt!esidential(5) lit PAr. L `Pia ii':yAYen !II nom_ Reson (5) ilie Plonning Area 11 Future Low Density Residential (9) Planning Area ill. Reson3 (4) Planning Area ill Resort (6) PrNele 60TH AVE LEGEND: 0 Project Receiver Locations Receiver Locations Existing 6 -Foot High Barrier Surf Lagoon/Wave Machine Outdoor/Pool/Spa Activity Outdoor Activity Neighborhood Commercial 12642-10 Noise Study 74 0 CROSSROADS URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis To describe the worst-case reference noise level conditions, the highest reference noise level describing each peak wave noise event of 75.7 dBA Leq at a distance of 12 feet is used. This reference noise level likely overstates the expected noise levels from the wave basin/wave machine activity at the Coral Mountain Specific Plan since it only describes the actual wave event. In addition, improved designs plan for the Project have placed the cable roller system under the water surface to eliminate this noise source. The wave basin/wave machine activities will be limited to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. with no planned nighttime activities. 10.1.2 OUTDOOR POOL/SPA ACTIVITY To determine the noise levels associated with outdoor hotel pool and spa activity, Urban Crossroads collected a reference noise level measurement on March 16th, 2005 at the Westin Hotel in the City of Rancho Mirage. The measured reference noise level at 50 feet is 57.8 dBA Leq. The outdoor pool/spa activity noise levels include a waterfall, people talking, and children and adults swimming and playing in a pool. The outdoor pool/spa activities will be limited to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. with no planned nighttime activities. 10.1.3 OUTDOOR ACTIVITIES To represent the potential noise level impacts associated with the Project's outdoor or beach club activities, a reference noise level measurement was collected on Wednesday, October 8th, 2014 at the Founders Park in the unincorporated community of Ladera Ranch in the County of Orange. The reference noise levels collected at the Founders Park are expected to overestimate the noise level activities within the outdoor fields and game areas at the Project site, since the reference noise level measurement includes parents speaking on cell phones, kids playing, and background youth soccer games, with coaches shouting instructions and people cheering and clapping. Using the uniform reference distance of 50 feet, the reference playground activity noise level is 43.4 dBA Leq. The outdoor field activities will be limited to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. with no planned nighttime activities. 10.1.4 NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL To describe the potential noise level impacts associated the proposed neighborhood commercial center a reference noise level measurement was collected at the Destination Ramon Commercial Center in Cathedral City on April 18, 2018. The noise level measurements collected show a peak hourly noise level of 54.8 dBA Leq when measured at 50 feet. The neighborhood commercial use will be limited to the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. with no planned nighttime activities. 12642-10 Noise Study 75 [,1 URBAN CR055ROAD5 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 10-1: REFERENCE NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENTS Noise Source Duration (hh:mm:ss) Ref. Distance (Feet) Noise Source Height (Feet) Min./Hours Reference Noise Level (dBA Leg) Sound Power Level (dBA)6 Day Night @ Ref. Dist. @ 50 Feet Wave Basin/Wave Machine' 00:10:00 12' 5' 60 0 75.7 63.3 112.0 Outdoor Pool/Spa Activity' 00:10:00 5' 5' 60 0 77.8 57.8 103.3 Outdoor Activity3 00:15:00 5' 5' 60 0 63.4 43.4 84.3 Neighborhood Commercial' 00:01:00 20' 5' 60 0 62.8 54.8 99.6 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 4/13/2020 at the Surf Ranch in the City of Lemoore, CA. 'As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 3/16/2005 at the Westin Hotel in the City of Rancho Mirage. 3 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 10/8/2014 by Urban Crossroads, Inc. at the Founder's Park in the County of Orange. 4 As measured by Urban Crossroads, Inc. on 4/18/2018 by Urban Crossroads, Inc. at Destination Ramon Commercial Center 5 Anticipated duration (minutes within the hour) of noise activity during typical hourly conditions expected at the Project site. "Day" = 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Night" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. 'Sound power level represents the total amount of acoustical energy (noise level) produced by a sound source independent of distance or surroundings. Sound power levels calculated using the CadnaA noise model at the reference distance to the noise source. Numbers may vary due to size differences between point and area noise sources. 10.2 CADNAA NOISE PREDICTION MODEL To fully describe the exterior operational noise levels from the Project, Urban Crossroads, Inc. developed a noise prediction model using the CadnaA (Computer Aided Noise Abatement) computer program. CadnaA can analyze multiple types of noise sources using the spatially accurate Project site plan, georeferenced Nearmap aerial imagery, topography, buildings, and barriers in its calculations to predict outdoor noise levels. Using the ISO 9613 protocol, CadnaA will calculate the distance from each noise source to the noise receiver locations, using the ground absorption, distance, and barrier/building attenuation inputs to provide a summary of noise level at each receiver and the partial noise level contributions by noise source. Consistent with the ISO 9613 protocol, the CadnaA noise prediction model relies on the reference sound power level (PWL) to describe individual noise sources. While sound pressure levels (e.g. Leq) quantify in decibels the intensity of given sound sources at a reference distance, sound power levels (PWL) are connected to the sound source and are independent of distance. Sound pressure levels vary substantially with distance from the source and diminish as a result of intervening obstacles and barriers, air absorption, wind, and other factors. Sound power is the acoustical energy emitted by the sound source and is an absolute value that is not affected by the environment. The operational noise level calculations provided in this noise study account for the distance attenuation provided due to geometric spreading, when sound from a localized stationary source (i.e., a point source) propagates uniformly outward in a spherical pattern. Hard site conditions are used in the operational noise analysis which result in noise levels that attenuate (or decrease) at a rate of 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from a point source. A default ground attenuation factor of 1.0 was used in the CadnaA noise analysis to account for hard site conditions. Appendix 12642-10 Noise Study 76 [,1 URBAN CRO55ROAD5 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 10.1 includes the detailed noise model inputs used to estimate the Project operational noise levels presented in this section. 10.3 PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS Using the reference noise levels to represent the proposed Project operations that include wave basin/wave machine activity, outdoor pool/spa activity, outdoor activity, and neighborhood commercial land use activity, Urban Crossroads, Inc. calculated the off-site and on-site operational source noise levels that are expected to be generated at the Project site and the Project -related noise level increases that would be experienced at each of the receiver locations. Tables 10-2 shows the Project operational noise levels during the daytime hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. The daytime hourly noise levels at the off-site receiver locations are expected to range from 39.8 to 53.3 dBA Leq. The on-site project receiver locations are expected to range from 51.8 to 64.5 dBA Leq. In addition, the unmitigated exterior noise levels at the property line located approximately 200 feet east of the wave basin are estimated at 59.3 dBA Leq. However, there are currently no outdoor living areas or receivers near this location. TABLE 10-2: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVELS Receiver L Location' Project Operational Noise Levels (dBA Leq)2 Wave Basin/ Wave Machine Outdoor Pool/ Spa Activity Outdoor Activity Neighborhood Commercial Total R1 44.2 36.0 19.0 41.8 46.6 R2 38.0 30.3 11.8 45.7 46.5 R3 37.4 29.7 10.9 42.5 43.8 R4 38.2 30.9 11.4 40.9 43.0 R5 39.3 32.3 12.1 37.7 42.1 R6 51.4 44.0 19.5 31.5 52.2 R7 45.0 38.9 11.5 28.9 46.0 R8 46.6 36.5 13.5 23.2 47.0 R9 41.1 30.3 15.3 23.5 41.5 R10 38.6 29.0 13.5 31.4 39.8 P1 58.3 43.8 37.2 32.4 58.5 P2 53.1 51.4 23.8 34.5 55.4 P3 61.1 46.7 29.2 30.5 61.3 P4 53.7 40.8 15.8 23.3 53.9 P5 53.9 48.6 22.0 32.8 55.1 P6 53.2 46.4 29.5 36.0 54.1 P7 50.4 45.6 23.5 37.6 51.8 P8 44.7 37.3 18.7 53.0 53.7 P9 62.2 47.9 38.6 32.5 62.4 P10 64.0 55.1 24.7 31.4 64.5 12642-10 Noise Study 77 Co URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 'See Exhibit 10-A for the off-site (R)eceiver and on-site (P)roject locations. 2 Unmitigated CadnaA noise model calculations are included in Appendix 10.1. 10.4 PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE To demonstrate compliance with local noise regulations, the Project -only operational noise levels are evaluated against exterior noise level thresholds based on the City of La Quinta exterior noise level standards at the off-site and on-site receiver locations. Table 10-3 shows the operational noise levels associated with Coral Mountain Specific Plan Project will satisfy the City of La Quinta daytime exterior noise level standards with no planned nighttime operational noise source activity. Therefore, the operational noise impacts are considered Tess than significant at all receiver locations. TABLE 10-3: OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE Receiver Location' Project Operational Noise Levels (dBA Leq)2 Noise Level Standards (dBA Leq)3 Noise Level Standards Exceeded?' R1 46.6 65 No R2 46.5 65 No R3 43.8 65 No R4 43.0 65 No R5 42.1 65 No R6 52.2 65 No R7 46.0 65 No R8 47.0 65 No R9 41.5 65 No R10 39.8 65 No P1 58.5 65 No P2 55.4 65 No P3 61.3 65 No P4 53.9 65 No P5 55.1 65 No P6 54.1 65 No P7 51.8 65 No P8 53.7 65 No P9 62.4 65 No P10 64.5 65 No 'See Exhibit 10-A for the off-site (R)eceiver and on-site (P)roject locations. 2 Proposed Project daytime operational noise levels as shown on Tables 10-2. 3 Exterior noise level standards for residential land use, as shown on Table 4-2. Do the estimated Project operational noise source activities exceed the noise level standards? 12642-10 Noise Study 78 Co URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 10.4 PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASE To describe the Project operational noise level Increase, the Project operational noise levels are combined with the existing ambient noise levels measurements for the nearby receiver locations potentially impacted by Project operational noise sources. Since the units used to measure noise, decibels (dB), are logarithmic units, the Project -operational and existing ambient noise levels cannot be combined using standard arithmetic equations. (4) Instead, they must be logarithmically added using the following base equation: SP LTotal = 10Iogio[10sNL1/10 + 10SPL2/10 + 10SPLn/10] Where "SPL1," "SPL2," etc. are equal to the sound pressure levels being combined, or in this case, the Project -operational and existing ambient noise levels. The difference between the combined Project and ambient noise levels describes the Project noise level Increase to the existing ambient noise environment. As indicated on Tables 10-4 the Project will generate unmitigated daytime operational noise level increase ranging from 0.0 to 4.9 dBA Leq at nearby off-site receiver locations. This increase satisfies the incremental operational noise level criteria presented in Table 4-2. Therefore, the incremental Project operational noise level increase is considered less than significant at all receiver locations. TABLE 10-4: DAYTIME PROJECT OPERATIONAL NOISE LEVEL INCREASES Receiver Operational Location Total Project Noise Level' Meas. s Location Reference Ambient Noise Levels4 Combined Project and Ambients Project6 Increase Threshold' Threshold' Exceeded? R1 46.6 L1 54.2 54.9 0.7 5.0 No R2 46.5 L2 62.5 62.6 0.1 3.0 No R3 43.8 L3 61.2 61.3 0.1 3.0 No R4 43.0 L4 54.5 54.8 0.3 5.0 No R5 42.1 L5 59.7 59.8 0.1 5.0 No R6 52.2 L6 58.7 59.6 0.9 5.0 No R7 46.0 L7 57.9 58.2 0.3 5.0 No R8 47.0 L8 43.8 48.7 4.9 5.0 No R9 41.5 L9 51.7 52.1 0.4 5.0 No R10 39.8 L10 61.9 61.9 0.0 3.0 No 1 See Exhibit 9-A for the off-site sensitive receiver ocations. 2 Total Project operational noise levels as shown on Table 10-3. 3 Reference noise level measurement locations as shown on Exhibit 5-A. 4 Observed daytime ambient noise levels as shown on Table 5-1. Represents the combined ambient conditions plus the Project activities. 6 The noise level increase expected with the addition of the proposed Project activities. ' Significance Criteria as defined in Section 4. 12642-10 Noise Study 79 [^�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 80 `�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 11 CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS This section analyzes potential impacts resulting from the short-term construction activities associated with the development of the Project. Exhibit 11-A shows the construction noise source locations in relation to the nearby sensitive receiver locations previously described in Section 8. In addition, Exhibit 11-A outlines the Project Phase 1 boundaries to describe the potential construction impacts from on planned residential development in Phase 3. 11.1 CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS Noise generated by the Project construction equipment will include a combination of trucks, power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that when combined can reach high levels. The number and mix of construction equipment are expected to occur in the following stages: • Site Preparation • Grading • Building Construction • Paving • Architectural Coating This construction noise analysis was prepared using reference noise level measurements taken by Urban Crossroads, Inc. to describe the typical construction activity noise levels for each stage of Project construction. The construction reference noise level measurements represent a list of typical construction activity noise levels. Noise levels generated by heavy construction equipment can range from approximately 68 dBA to more than 80 dBA when measured at 50 feet. However, these noise levels diminish with distance from the construction site at a rate of 6 dBA per doubling of distance. For example, a noise level of 80 dBA measured at 50 feet from the noise source to the receiver would be reduced to 74 dBA at 100 feet from the source to the receiver and would be further reduced to 68 dBA at 200 feet from the source to the receiver. 11.2 CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS To describe the Project construction noise levels, measurements were collected for similar activities at several construction sites. Table 11-1 provides a summary of the construction reference noise level measurements. Since the reference noise levels were collected at varying distances, all construction noise level measurements presented on Table 11-1 have been adjusted to describe a uniform reference distance of 50 feet. 12642-10 Noise Study 81 [ ,0 URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis EXHIBIT 11-A: CONSTRUCTION NOISE SOURCE AND RECEIVER LOCATIONS LEGEND: Q, Project Receiver Locations Receiver Locations Existing 6 -Foot High Barrier Phase 1 Construction Activity FZ Phase 2 & 3 Construction Activity Lill Phase 1, 2 & 3 Construction Activity 12642-10 Noise Study 82 `�► URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 11-1: CONSTRUCTION REFERENCE NOISE LEVELS Construction Stage Reference Construction Activity' Reference Noise Level @ 50 Feet (dBA Leq) Highest Reference Noise Level (dBA Leq) Site Preparation Scraper, Water Truck, & Dozer Activity 75.3 75.3 Backhoe 64.2 Water Truck Pass -By & Backup Alarm 71.9 Grading Rough Grading Activities 73.5 73.5 Water Truck Pass -By & Backup Alarm 71.9 Construction Vehicle Maintenance Activities 67.5 Building Construction Foundation Trenching 68.2 71.6 Framing 62.3 Concrete Mixer Backup Alarms & Air Brakes 71.6 Paving Concrete Mixer Truck Movements 71.2 71.2 Concrete Paver Activities 65.6 Concrete Mixer Pour & Paving Activities 65.9 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 65.2 65.2 Generator 64.9 Crane 62.3 11.3 CONSTRUCTION NOISE ANALYSIS Using the reference construction equipment noise levels and the CadnaA noise prediction model, calculations of the Project construction noise level impacts at the nearby sensitive receiver locations were completed. To assess the worst-case construction noise levels, the Project construction noise analysis relies on the highest noise level impacts when the equipment with the highest reference noise level is operating at the closest point from the edge of primary construction activity (Project site boundary) to each receiver location. As shown on Table 11-2, the Project Phase 1 construction noise levels are expected to range from 58.0 to 76.5 dBA Leq at the nearby receiver locations. The Project Phase 2 and Phase 3 construction noise levels are expected to range from 63.7 to 75.8 dBA Leq as shown on Table 11- 3. Appendix 11.1 includes the detailed CadnaA construction noise model inputs. 12642-10 Noise Study 83 [,► URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis TABLE 11-2: PHASE 1 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY Receiver Locations Construction Noise Levels (d BA Leq) Site Preparation Grading Building Construction Paving Architectural Coating Highest Levels2 R1 65.6 63.8 61.9 61.5 55.5 65.6 R2 65.8 64.0 62.1 61.7 55.7 65.8 R3 63.0 61.2 59.3 58.9 52.9 63.0 R4 62.3 60.5 58.6 58.2 52.2 62.3 R5 61.6 59.8 57.9 57.5 51.5 61.6 R6 71.3 69.5 67.6 67.2 61.2 71.3 R7 72.5 70.7 68.8 68.4 62.4 72.5 R8 76.5 74.7 72.8 72.4 66.4 76.5 R9 58.7 56.9 55.0 54.6 48.6 58.7 R10 58.0 56.2 54.3 53.9 47.9 58.0 'Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A. 2 Construction noise level calculations based on distance from the project site boundaries (construction activity area) to nearby receiver locations. CadnaA construction noise model inputs are included in Appendix 11.1. TABLE 11-3: PHASE 2 & 3 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT NOISE LEVEL SUMMARY Receiver Locations Construction Noise Levels (d BA Leq) Site Preparation Grading Building Construction Paving Architectural Coating Highest Levels2 R1 74.8 73.0 71.1 70.7 64.7 74.8 R2 69.9 68.1 66.2 65.8 59.8 69.9 R3 67.9 66.1 64.2 63.8 57.8 67.9 R4 68.8 67.0 65.1 64.7 58.7 68.8 R5 70.6 68.8 66.9 66.5 60.5 70.6 R6 75.8 74.0 72.1 71.7 65.7 75.8 R7 68.6 66.8 64.9 64.5 58.5 68.6 R8 67.5 65.7 63.8 63.4 57.4 67.5 R9 63.7 61.9 60.0 59.6 53.6 63.7 R10 64.0 62.2 60.3 59.9 53.9 64.0 P1 82.8 81.0 79.1 78.7 72.7 82.8 P2 76.8 75.0 73.1 72.7 66.7 76.8 P3 82.3 80.5 78.6 78.2 72.2 82.3 P4 70.6 68.8 66.9 66.5 60.5 70.6 P5 82.5 80.7 78.8 78.4 72.4 82.5 P6 82.9 81.1 79.2 78.8 72.8 82.9 P7 83.2 81.4 79.5 79.1 73.1 83.2 P8 83.1 81.3 79.4 79.0 73.0 83.1 12642-10 Noise Study 84 URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis Receiver Locations Construction Noise Levels (dBA Leq) Site Preparation Grading Building Construction Paving Architectural Coating Highest Levels' P9 75.3 73.5 71.6 71.2 65.2 75.3 P10 72.6 70.8 68.9 68.5 62.5 72.6 1 Noise receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A. 2 Construction noise level calculations based on distance from the project site boundaries (construction activity area) to nearby receiver locations. CadnaA construction noise model inputs are included in Appendix 11.1. 11.4 CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE The construction noise analysis shows that the highest construction noise levels will occur when construction activities take place at the closest point from primary Project construction activity to each of the nearby receiver locations. To evaluate whether the Project will generate potentially significant short-term noise levels at nearby receiver locations, a construction -related the NIOSH noise level threshold of 85 dBA Leq is used as acceptable thresholds to assess construction noise level impacts. The construction noise analysis shows that the nearby receiver locations will satisfy the 85 dBA Leq significance threshold during Project construction activities as shown on Tables 11-2 and 11-3. Therefore, the noise impacts due to Project construction noise is considered less than significant at all receiver locations. 11.5 CONSTRUCTION VIBRATION IMPACTS Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures and soil type. It is expected that ground -borne vibration from Project construction activities would cause only intermittent, localized intrusion. The proposed Project's construction activities most likely to cause vibration impacts are: • Heavy Construction Equipment: Although all heavy mobile construction equipment has the potential of causing at least some perceptible vibration while operating close to buildings, the vibration is usually short-term and is not of sufficient magnitude to cause building damage. • Trucks: Trucks hauling building materials to construction sites can be sources of vibration intrusion if the haul routes pass through residential neighborhoods on streets with bumps or potholes. Repairing the bumps and potholes generally eliminates the problem. Ground -borne vibration levels resulting from construction activities occurring within the Project site were estimated by data published by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Construction activities that would have the potential to generate low levels of ground -borne vibration within the Project site include grading. Using the vibration source level of construction equipment provided on Table 6-6 and the construction vibration assessment methodology published by the FTA, it is possible to estimate the Project vibration impacts. Table 11-4 presents the expected Project related vibration levels at the nearby receiver locations. 12642-10 Noise Study 85 [ ,0 URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis At distances ranging from 90 to 1,451 from Project construction activities, construction vibration velocity levels are estimated to range from 0.000 to 0.009 in/sec RMS and will remain below the threshold of 0.01 in/sec RMS at all receiver locations, as shown on Table 11-4. Therefore, the Project -related vibration impacts are considered less than significant during the construction activities at the Project site. TABLE 11-4: CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT VIBRATION LEVELS Receiver'Const. Distance to Activity (Feet) Receiver Levels (in/sec) PPV2 RMS Velocity Levels (in/sec)3 Threshold (in/sec) RMS4 Threshold Exceeded?5 Small Bulldozer Jack- hammer Loaded Trucks Large Bulldozer Peak Vibration R1 154' 0.000 0.002 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.004 0.01 No R2 181' 0.000 0.002 0.004 0.005 0.005 0.003 0.01 No R3 323' 0.000 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.01 No R4 519' 0.000 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.01 No R5 352' 0.000 0.001 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.01 No R6 134' 0.000 0.003 0.006 0.007 0.007 0.005 0.01 No R7 90' 0.000 0.005 0.011 0.013 0.013 0.009 0.01 No R8 90' 0.000 0.005 0.011 0.013 0.013 0.009 0.01 No R9 1,451' 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.01 No R10 1,378' 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.01 No 1 Receiver locations are shown on Exhibit 11-A. Z Based on the Vibration Source Levels of Construction Equipment included on Table 6-6. 'Vibration levels in PPV are converted to RMS velocity using a 0.71 conversion factor identified in the Caltrans Transportation and Construction Vibration Guidance Manual, September 2013. °Source: County of Riverside General Plan Noise Element, Policy N 16.3. 'Does the vibration level exceed the maximum acceptable vibration threshold? Moreover, the impacts at the site of the closest sensitive receivers are unlikely to be sustained during the entire construction period but will occur rather only during the times that heavy construction equipment is operating adjacent to the Project site perimeter. 12642-10 Noise Study 86 Co URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 12 REFERENCES 1. State of California. California Environmental Quality Act, Appendix G. 2018. 2. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Coral Mountain Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis. April 2020. 3. Harris, Cyril M. Noise Control in Buildings. s.l. : McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1994. 4. California Department of Transportation Environmental Program. Technical Noise Supplement - A Technical Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. Sacramento, CA : s.n., September 2013. 5. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control. Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety. March 1974. EPA/ONAC 550/9/74-004. 6. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environment and Planning, Noise and Air Quality Branch. Highway Traffic Noise Analysis and Abatement Policy and Guidance. December 2011. 7. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Highway Traffic Noise in the United States, Problem and Response. April 2000. p. 3. 8. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control. Noise Effects Handbook -A Desk Reference to Health and Welfare Effects of Noise. October 1979 (revised July 1981). EPA 550/9/82/106. 9. California Department of Transportation. Technical Noise Supplement. November 2009. 10. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Standard 29 CRF, Part 1910. 11. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. September 2018. 12. Office of Planning and Research. State of California General Plan Guidelines. 2018. 13. City of La Quinta. General Plan Environmental Hazards Element, Noise. December 2013. 14. -. Municipal Code, Sections 9.100, 6.08. 15. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. Criteria for Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure. June 1998. 16. County of Riverside. General Plan Noise Element. December 2015. 17. Federal Interagency Committee on Noise. Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues. August 1992. 18. American National Standards Institute (ANSI). Specification for Sound Level Meters ANSI S1.4- 2014/IEC 61672-1:2013. 19. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction Model. December 1978. FHWA-RD-77-108. 20. California Department of Transportation Environmental Program, Office of Environmental Engineering. Use of California Vehicle Noise Reference Energy Mean Emission Levels (Calveno REMEL5) in FHWA Highway Traffic Noise Prediction. September 1995. TAN 95-03. 21. California Department of Transportation. Traffic Noise Attenuation as a Function of Ground and Vegetation Final Report. June 1995. FHWA/CA/TL-95/23. 22. County of Riverside, Office of Industrial Hygiene. Requirements for Determining and Mitigating Traffic Noise Impacts to Residential Structures. April 2015. 12642-10 Noise Study 87 [,1 URBAN CR055ROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 23. California Department of Transportation. Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol. May 2011. 12642-10 Noise Study 88 `�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis 13 CERTIFICATION The contents of this noise study report represent an accurate depiction of the noise environment and impacts associated with the proposed Coral Mountain Specific Plan Project. The information contained in this noise study report is based on the best available data at the time of preparation. If you have any questions, please contact me directly at (949) 336-5979. Bill Lawson, P.E., INCE Principal URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. 260 E. Baker Street, Suite 200 Costa Mesa, CA 92626 (949) 336-5979 blawson@urbanxroads.com EDUCATION pVJ A OFESSIRD 4s No. TR 2537 TRAFFIC OF CALIF Master of Science in Civil and Environmental Engineering California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo • December, 1993 Bachelor of Science in City and Regional Planning California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo • June, 1992 PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS PE — Registered Professional Traffic Engineer — TR 2537 • January, 2009 AICP — American Institute of Certified Planners — 013011 • June, 1997—January 1, 2012 PTP — Professional Transportation Planner • May, 2007 — May, 2013 INCE — Institute of Noise Control Engineering • March, 2004 PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS ASA — Acoustical Society of America ITE — Institute of Transportation Engineers PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATIONS Certified Acoustical Consultant — County of Orange • February, 2011 FHWA-NHI-142051 Highway Traffic Noise Certificate of Training • February, 2013 12642-10 Noise Study 89 Co URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 90 `�1 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis APPENDIX 3.1: CITY OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE 12642-10 Noise Study 91 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 92 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS La Quinta Municipal Code Up Previous Next Main Search Print No Frames Title 9 ZONING Chapter 9.100 SUPPLEMENTAL NONRESIDENTIAL REGULATIONS 9.100.210 Noise control. A. Purpose. The noise control standards for nonresidential land use districts set forth in this section are established to prevent excessive sound levels which are detrimental to the public health, welfare and safety or which are contrary to the public interest. B. Noise Standards. Exterior noise standards are set forth below. Residential property, schools, hospitals, and churches are considered noise sensitive land uses, regardless of the land use district in which they are located. All other uses shall comply with the "other nonresidential" standard. All noise measurements shall be taken using standard noise measuring instruments. Measurements shall be taken within the receiving property at locations determined by director to be most appropriate to the individual situation. Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments Land Uses CNEL (dBA) 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 Residential — Single -Family Dwellings, Duplex, Mobile Homes A B C D V Residential — Multiple Family A B C D Transient Lodging: Hotels and Motels A B C D School Classrooms, Libraries, Churches, Hospitals, Nursing Homes and Convalescent Hospitals A B c D Auditoriums, Concert Halls, Amphitheaters B C Sports Arenas, Outdoor Spectator Sports B C Playgrounds, Neighborhood Parks A C D Golf Courses, Riding Stables, Water Recreation, Cemeteries A C D Office Buildings, Business, Commercial and Professional A B D Industrial, Manufacturing, Utilities, Agriculture A Source: California Department of Health Services, "Guidelines for the Preparation and Content of the Noise Element of the General Plan," 1990. 93 Chart Legend A Normally Acceptable: With no special noise reduction requirements assuming standard construction. B Conditionally Acceptable: New construction or development should be undertaken only after a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirement is made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. C Normally Unacceptable: New construction is discouraged. If new construction does proceed, a detailed analysis of the noise reduction requirements must be made and needed noise insulation features included in the design. D Clearly Unacceptable: New construction or development should generally not be undertaken. Exterior Noise Standards Receiving Land Use Noise Standard Time Period 65 dB(A) 7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m. Noise sensitive 50 dB(A) 10:00 p.m. 7:00 a.m. Other nonresidential 75 dB(A) 7:00 a.m.-10:00 p.m. 65 dB(A) 10:00 p.m. 7:00 a.m. If the noise consists entirely of impact noise, simple tone noise, speech or music, or any combination thereof, each of the noise levels specified in the table in this section shall be reduced by five dB(A). C. Noise Limits. It is unlawful for any person at any location within the city to create any noise, or to allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied or otherwise controlled by such person, when such noise causes the noise level, when measured on any adjacent property, to exceed: 1. The noise standard for a cumulative period of more than thirty minutes in any hour; 2. The noise standard plus five dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than fifteen minutes in any hour; 3. The noise standard plus ten dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than five minutes in any hour; 4. The noise standard plus fifteen dB(A) for a cumulative period of more than one minute in any hour; or 5. The noise standard plus twenty dB(A) for any period of time. For purposes of this section, the term "cumulative period" means the number of minutes that a noise occurs within any hour, whether such minutes are consecutive or not. D. Ambient Noise Level. If the ambient or background noise level exceeds any of the preceding noise categories, no increase above such ambient noise level shall be permitted. E. Exemptions. The following are exempt from the noise restrictions of this section: 1. Emergency vehicles or other emergency operations. 2. City maintenance, construction or similar activities. 3. Construction activities regulated by Section 6.08.050 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 4. Golf course maintenance activities between five -thirty a.m. and ending no later than eight p.m. on any given day. F. Enforcement. The city manager or designee shall have the responsibility and authority to enforce the provisions of this section. (Ord. 565 § 1, 2017; Ord. 550 § 1, 2016) View the mobile version. 94 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis APPENDIX 5.1: STUDY AREA PHOTOS 12642-10 Noise Study 95 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 96 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS JN: 12642 Study Area Photos L1_E 33, 37' 39.900000", 116, 15' 13.400000" L1_N 33, 37' 39.830000", 116, 15' 13.430000" L1_S 33, 37' 39.830000", 116, 15' 13.430000" L2_E 33, 37' 39.670000", 116, 15' 5.000000" 97 L1_W 33, 37' 39.900000", 116, 15' 13.400000" • L �( L2_N 33, 37' 39.670000", 116, 15' 5.030000" JN: 12642 Study Area Photos L2_S 33, 37' 39.680000", 116, 15' 5.030000" L2_W 33, 37' 39.680000", 116, 15' 4.970000" L3_E 33, 37' 40.370000", 116, 15' 1.730000" L3_N 33, 37' 40.600000", 116, 15' 1.870000" L3_S 33, 37' 40.600000", 116, 15' 1.870000" 98 L3_W 33, 37' 40.370000", 116, 15' 1.730000" JN: 12642 Study Area Photos L4_H 33, 37' 36.210000", 116, 15' 1.040000" L4_N 33, 37' 35.640000", 116, 14' 59.700000" L4_S 33, 37' 36.190000", 116, 15' 1.100000" L4_W 33, 37' 36.220000", 116, 15' 1.040000" L5_E 33, 37' 38.390000", 116, 15' 1.730000" 99 L5_N 33, 37' 37.150000", 116, 15' 1.700000" JN: 12642 Study Area Photos L5_S 33, 37' 38.460000", 116, 15 1.700000" L5_W 33, 37' 38.350000", 116, 15' 1.700000" L6_E 33, 36' 56.080000", 116, 15' 2.250000" L6S L6_N 33, 36' 53.960000", 116, 14' 58.540000" 100 L6_W 33, 36' 55.980000", 116, 15' 2.200000" JN: 12642 Study Area Photos L7_E 33, 36' 46.100000", 116, 15' 7.170000" L7_S L7_N L7_W 33, 36' 45.940000", 116, 15' 7.060000" L8_E 33, 36' 45.670000", 116, 15' 21.180000" 101 L8_N 33, 36' 53.960000", 116, 14' 58.540000" JN: 12642 Study Area Photos L8_5 33, 36' 45.670000", 116, 15' 21.180000" L9_E 33, 37' 28.040000", 116, 16' 13.330000" L8_W 33, 36' 45.660000", 116, 15' 21.150000" _ �-■:. - --• ` +,,. • L9_N 33, 38' 49.930000", 116, 16' 5.310000" L9_5 33, 37' 28.020000", 116, 16' 13.330000" 102 L9_W 33, 37' 28.050000", 116, 16' 13.310000" JN: 12642 Study Area Photos L1O_E 33, 37' 39.780000", 116, 15' 47.190000" L10_N 33, 37' 39.760000", 116, 15' 47.190000" L10_S 33, 37' 39.760000", 116, 15' 47.190000" 103 L10_W 33, 37' 39.820000", 116, 15' 47.210000" Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 104 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis APPENDIX 5.2: NOISE LEVEL MEASUREMENT WORKSHEETS 12642-10 Noise Study 105 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 106 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS 24 -Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 Project: 1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain L1 - Located along 58th Ave. in front of entrance to Coral Location: Mountain and west of Salida del Sol. Meter: Piccolo I JN: 12642 Analyst: P. Mara Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted) 85.0 80.0 m 75.0 a 70.0 Q 65.0 60.0 - 55.0 3 50.0 o 45.0 = 40.0 35.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 40.8 36.5 38.2 42.3 51.0 57.7 56.9 61.3 43.9 58.0 64.6 71.7 80.3 80.5 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 41.0 43.0 39.0 45.0 52.0 64.0 68.0 68.0 43.0 39.0 42.0 48.0 62.0 67.0 67.0 42.0 36.0 39.0 43.0 56.0 64.0 63.0 42.0 36.0 37.0 41.0 52.0 62.0 59.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 43.0 53.0 51.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 46.0 48.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 44.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 40.8 36.5 38.2 42.3 51.0 57.7 56.9 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 50.8 46.5 48.2 52.3 61.0 67.7 66.9 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 55.8 56.7 54.0 55.6 55.3 54.8 57.4 55.3 54.8 53.6 50.0 47.7 76.5 80.1 75.0 77.9 74.7 73.0 80.0 78.2 76.3 73.1 67.7 67.4 41.8 39.3 39.1 37.6 41.0 40.9 39.2 38.7 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 67.0 67.0 66.0 67.0 67.0 66.0 68.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 62.0 60.0 66.0 65.0 64.0 65.0 65.0 64.0 65.0 65.0 64.0 64.0 60.0 57.0 63.0 62.0 60.0 61.0 62.0 61.0 62.0 61.0 61.0 60.0 57.0 53.0 60.0 60.0 58.0 59.0 59.0 60.0 60.0 59.0 58.0 57.0 54.0 50.0 50.0 51.0 47.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 53.0 50.0 49.0 45.0 45.0 44.0 46.0 44.0 42.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 45.0 44.0 43.0 40.0 41.0 41.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 40.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 42.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 55.8 56.7 54.0 55.6 55.3 54.8 57.4 55.3 54.8 53.6 50.0 47.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.8 56.7 54.0 55.6 55.3 54.8 57.4 55.3 54.8 53.6 50.0 47.7 Evening 19 20 21 51.9 44.7 47.4 80.5 66.7 74.1 36.3 36.3 36.3 62.0 58.0 58.0 59.0 53.0 51.0 45.0 54.0 47.0 49.0 43.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 I 51.9 44.7 47.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 56.9 49.7 52.4 Night 22 42.3 65.9 36.3 48.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 42.3 10.0 52.3 23 39.4 45.9 36.3 42.0 42.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 39.4 10.0 49.4 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ea 47.7 57.4 54.9 67.4 80.1 36.3 41.8 Ave age: L1% 60.0 68.0 65.7 L2% 57.0 66.0 63.7 L5% 53.0 63.0 60.3 L8% 50.0 60.0 57.8 L25% 44.0 53.0 48.4 L50% 40.0 46.0 42.9 L90% 36.0 43.0 39.4 L95% 36.0 42.0 39.0 L99% 36.0 42.0 38.6 Evening Min Max Energy Average 44.7 51.9 49.0 66.7 36.3 80.5 36.3 Ave age: 58.0 62.0 59.3 51.0 59.0 54.7 45.0 53.0 48.3 43.0 49.0 45.7 41.0 43.0 42.3 39.0 41.0 39.7 36.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 37.0 36.3 Night Min 36.5 43.9 Max 57.7 80.5 Energy Average 51.5 36.3 41.0 Ave age: 39.0 68.0 52.1 39.0 36.0 67.0 64.0 50.3 47.2 36.0 62.0 45.7 36.0 53.0 42.2 36.0 48.0 39.4 36.0 44.0 37.3 36.0 43.0 37.1 36.0 42.0 36.7 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 53.4 54.2 51.5 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 58.5 k\Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L1_B 107 0 CRCDSSaosaos URBAN m r. - O - vLn O � M - NNu+-NNmin op - n - eR 00 in N M 00 - �p O oin n et � O1 .�Ln n 4-a M a o �o CO1 u`aiin rn MI 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 40.8 36.5 38.2 42.3 51.0 57.7 56.9 61.3 43.9 58.0 64.6 71.7 80.3 80.5 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 41.0 43.0 39.0 45.0 52.0 64.0 68.0 68.0 43.0 39.0 42.0 48.0 62.0 67.0 67.0 42.0 36.0 39.0 43.0 56.0 64.0 63.0 42.0 36.0 37.0 41.0 52.0 62.0 59.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 43.0 53.0 51.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 46.0 48.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 44.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 40.8 36.5 38.2 42.3 51.0 57.7 56.9 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 50.8 46.5 48.2 52.3 61.0 67.7 66.9 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 55.8 56.7 54.0 55.6 55.3 54.8 57.4 55.3 54.8 53.6 50.0 47.7 76.5 80.1 75.0 77.9 74.7 73.0 80.0 78.2 76.3 73.1 67.7 67.4 41.8 39.3 39.1 37.6 41.0 40.9 39.2 38.7 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 67.0 67.0 66.0 67.0 67.0 66.0 68.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 62.0 60.0 66.0 65.0 64.0 65.0 65.0 64.0 65.0 65.0 64.0 64.0 60.0 57.0 63.0 62.0 60.0 61.0 62.0 61.0 62.0 61.0 61.0 60.0 57.0 53.0 60.0 60.0 58.0 59.0 59.0 60.0 60.0 59.0 58.0 57.0 54.0 50.0 50.0 51.0 47.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 53.0 50.0 49.0 45.0 45.0 44.0 46.0 44.0 42.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 45.0 44.0 43.0 40.0 41.0 41.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 40.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 42.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 55.8 56.7 54.0 55.6 55.3 54.8 57.4 55.3 54.8 53.6 50.0 47.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.8 56.7 54.0 55.6 55.3 54.8 57.4 55.3 54.8 53.6 50.0 47.7 Evening 19 20 21 51.9 44.7 47.4 80.5 66.7 74.1 36.3 36.3 36.3 62.0 58.0 58.0 59.0 53.0 51.0 45.0 54.0 47.0 49.0 43.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 I 51.9 44.7 47.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 56.9 49.7 52.4 Night 22 42.3 65.9 36.3 48.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 42.3 10.0 52.3 23 39.4 45.9 36.3 42.0 42.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 39.4 10.0 49.4 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ea 47.7 57.4 54.9 67.4 80.1 36.3 41.8 Ave age: L1% 60.0 68.0 65.7 L2% 57.0 66.0 63.7 L5% 53.0 63.0 60.3 L8% 50.0 60.0 57.8 L25% 44.0 53.0 48.4 L50% 40.0 46.0 42.9 L90% 36.0 43.0 39.4 L95% 36.0 42.0 39.0 L99% 36.0 42.0 38.6 Evening Min Max Energy Average 44.7 51.9 49.0 66.7 36.3 80.5 36.3 Ave age: 58.0 62.0 59.3 51.0 59.0 54.7 45.0 53.0 48.3 43.0 49.0 45.7 41.0 43.0 42.3 39.0 41.0 39.7 36.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 37.0 36.3 Night Min 36.5 43.9 Max 57.7 80.5 Energy Average 51.5 36.3 41.0 Ave age: 39.0 68.0 52.1 39.0 36.0 67.0 64.0 50.3 47.2 36.0 62.0 45.7 36.0 53.0 42.2 36.0 48.0 39.4 36.0 44.0 37.3 36.0 43.0 37.1 36.0 42.0 36.7 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 53.4 54.2 51.5 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 58.5 k\Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L1_B 107 0 CRCDSSaosaos URBAN 24 -Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 Project: 1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Location: L2 - Located along 58th Ave. South of home at 57925 Barristo Cir. Meter: Piccolo I JN: 12642 Analyst: P. Mara Hourly L e, dBA Readings (unadjusted) 85.0 80.0 75.0 -o 70.0 Q 65.0 60.0 > 55.0 `5 50.0 o 45.0 = 40.0 35.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 56.0 52.1 43.9 47.7 57.9 65.5 66.2 67.2 62.0 64.1 71.9 77.2 90.3 91.4 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 42.1 64.0 57.0 57.0 59.0 71.0 77.0 77.0 64.0 57.0 54.0 55.0 68.0 74.0 73.0 63.0 56.0 46.0 51.0 64.0 70.0 68.0 59.0 56.0 42.0 48.0 61.0 68.0 66.0 56.0 55.0 36.0 38.0 53.0 61.0 59.0 55.0 47.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 55.0 56.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 46.0 50.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 44.0 48.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.0 45.0 56.0 52.1 43.9 47.7 57.9 65.5 66.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 66.0 62.1 53.9 57.7 67.9 75.5 76.2 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 66.3 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 87.0 84.2 79.7 91.2 88.2 90.2 84.0 86.5 82.8 89.8 79.8 80.7 43.7 39.7 39.1 36.1 36.1 39.1 38.1 38.4 40.3 36.1 36.1 36.1 76.0 74.0 72.0 73.0 76.0 79.0 73.0 74.0 71.0 74.0 69.0 72.0 73.0 71.0 70.0 71.0 72.0 75.0 71.0 72.0 69.0 72.0 68.0 70.0 69.0 67.0 67.0 68.0 69.0 70.0 68.0 68.0 66.0 67.0 64.0 67.0 66.0 65.0 65.0 66.0 67.0 67.0 66.0 66.0 65.0 64.0 62.0 65.0 58.0 58.0 59.0 59.0 60.0 59.0 60.0 60.0 59.0 57.0 55.0 56.0 54.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 54.0 54.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 48.0 46.0 45.0 44.0 45.0 46.0 46.0 45.0 48.0 45.0 40.0 38.0 47.0 44.0 43.0 41.0 43.0 44.0 44.0 43.0 46.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 45.0 41.0 41.0 38.0 38.0 41.0 40.0 40.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 66.3 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 66.3 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 Evening 19 20 21 62.1 55.5 55.1 88.0 75.4 79.5 36.1 36.1 36.1 70.0 68.0 67.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 59.0 63.0 60.0 64.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 52.0 51.0 49.0 44.0 45.0 39.0 38.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 62.1 55.5 55.1 5.0 5.0 5.0 67.1 60.5 60.1 Night 22 61.4 76.4 36.1 74.0 74.0 66.0 58.0 55.0 49.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 61.4 10.0 71.4 23 51.8 67.0 36.1 65.0 64.0 57.0 55.0 47.0 44.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 51.8 10.0 61.8 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L„ 58.4 66.3 63.1 79.7 91.2 L ,, 36.1 43.7 Ave age: L1% 69.0 79.0 73.6 L2% 68.0 75.0 71.2 L5% 64.0 70.0 67.5 L8% 62.0 67.0 65.3 L25% 55.0 60.0 58.3 L50% 51.0 55.0 53.3 L90% 38.0 48.0 44.7 L95% 36.0 47.0 42.7 L99% 36.0 45.0 39.6 Min Evening Max Energy Average 55.1 62.1 58.8 75.4 36.1 88.0 36.1 Ave age: 67.0 70.0 68.3 63.0 59.0 68.0 66.0 65.0 61.7 58.0 64.0 60.0 51.0 57.0 53.3 44.0 49.0 46.0 38.0 39.0 38.7 36.0 38.0 36.7 36.0 36.0 36.0 Night Min 43.9 62.0 Max 66.2 91.4 36.1 57.0 54.0 46.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.1 77.0 74.0 70.0 68.0 61.0 56.0 50.0 48.0 45.0 Energy Average 60.7 Average: 66.8 64.8 60.1 57.0 51.1 46.8 38.7 38.2 37.4 L ee (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 61.9 62.5 60.7 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 67.6 \\Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600112642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L2 M 108 URBAN _ N -a -N -O _el_co (NJ -to to esi "tin -N WANin Lo a 1 ui u+ M 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 56.0 52.1 43.9 47.7 57.9 65.5 66.2 67.2 62.0 64.1 71.9 77.2 90.3 91.4 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 42.1 64.0 57.0 57.0 59.0 71.0 77.0 77.0 64.0 57.0 54.0 55.0 68.0 74.0 73.0 63.0 56.0 46.0 51.0 64.0 70.0 68.0 59.0 56.0 42.0 48.0 61.0 68.0 66.0 56.0 55.0 36.0 38.0 53.0 61.0 59.0 55.0 47.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 55.0 56.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 46.0 50.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 44.0 48.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.0 45.0 56.0 52.1 43.9 47.7 57.9 65.5 66.2 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 66.0 62.1 53.9 57.7 67.9 75.5 76.2 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 66.3 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 87.0 84.2 79.7 91.2 88.2 90.2 84.0 86.5 82.8 89.8 79.8 80.7 43.7 39.7 39.1 36.1 36.1 39.1 38.1 38.4 40.3 36.1 36.1 36.1 76.0 74.0 72.0 73.0 76.0 79.0 73.0 74.0 71.0 74.0 69.0 72.0 73.0 71.0 70.0 71.0 72.0 75.0 71.0 72.0 69.0 72.0 68.0 70.0 69.0 67.0 67.0 68.0 69.0 70.0 68.0 68.0 66.0 67.0 64.0 67.0 66.0 65.0 65.0 66.0 67.0 67.0 66.0 66.0 65.0 64.0 62.0 65.0 58.0 58.0 59.0 59.0 60.0 59.0 60.0 60.0 59.0 57.0 55.0 56.0 54.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 54.0 54.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 48.0 46.0 45.0 44.0 45.0 46.0 46.0 45.0 48.0 45.0 40.0 38.0 47.0 44.0 43.0 41.0 43.0 44.0 44.0 43.0 46.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 45.0 41.0 41.0 38.0 38.0 41.0 40.0 40.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 66.3 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 66.3 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 Evening 19 20 21 62.1 55.5 55.1 88.0 75.4 79.5 36.1 36.1 36.1 70.0 68.0 67.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 59.0 63.0 60.0 64.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 52.0 51.0 49.0 44.0 45.0 39.0 38.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 62.1 55.5 55.1 5.0 5.0 5.0 67.1 60.5 60.1 Night 22 61.4 76.4 36.1 74.0 74.0 66.0 58.0 55.0 49.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 61.4 10.0 71.4 23 51.8 67.0 36.1 65.0 64.0 57.0 55.0 47.0 44.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 51.8 10.0 61.8 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L„ 58.4 66.3 63.1 79.7 91.2 L ,, 36.1 43.7 Ave age: L1% 69.0 79.0 73.6 L2% 68.0 75.0 71.2 L5% 64.0 70.0 67.5 L8% 62.0 67.0 65.3 L25% 55.0 60.0 58.3 L50% 51.0 55.0 53.3 L90% 38.0 48.0 44.7 L95% 36.0 47.0 42.7 L99% 36.0 45.0 39.6 Min Evening Max Energy Average 55.1 62.1 58.8 75.4 36.1 88.0 36.1 Ave age: 67.0 70.0 68.3 63.0 59.0 68.0 66.0 65.0 61.7 58.0 64.0 60.0 51.0 57.0 53.3 44.0 49.0 46.0 38.0 39.0 38.7 36.0 38.0 36.7 36.0 36.0 36.0 Night Min 43.9 62.0 Max 66.2 91.4 36.1 57.0 54.0 46.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.1 77.0 74.0 70.0 68.0 61.0 56.0 50.0 48.0 45.0 Energy Average 60.7 Average: 66.8 64.8 60.1 57.0 51.1 46.8 38.7 38.2 37.4 L ee (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 61.9 62.5 60.7 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 67.6 \\Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600112642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L2 M 108 URBAN 24 -Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 Project: 1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain L3 - Located northeast of Madison St. and 58th Ave. adjacent Location: to wall enclosing golf course. Meter: Piccolo I JN: 12642 Analyst: P. Mara Hourly L e. dBA Readings (unadjusted) 85.0 80.0 75.0 a 70.0 Q 65.0 60.0 - 55.0 3 50.0 o 45.0 = 40.0 35.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Hour Beginning 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 39.5 35.9 42.0 48.8 54.6 59.4 62.9 56.6 50.2 63.3 74.1 72.6 79.5 85.3 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 46.0 51.0 42.0 54.0 60.0 67.0 69.0 73.0 49.0 41.0 52.0 57.0 63.0 67.0 70.0 44.0 39.0 46.0 53.0 60.0 64.0 67.0 41.0 37.0 41.0 50.0 58.0 62.0 65.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 52.0 58.0 61.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 55.0 57.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 46.0 50.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 49.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 47.0 39.5 35.9 42.0 48.8 54.6 59.4 62.9 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 49.5 45.9 52.0 58.8 64.6 69.4 72.9 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 63.8 60.3 61.4 63.9 63.1 60.1 63.1 62.9 62.9 62.7 57.6 55.9 89.4 82.8 80.5 90.7 84.5 79.9 85.5 83.7 84.1 89.1 78.0 73.8 44.5 39.2 39.2 36.2 36.2 39.1 40.0 40.0 40.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 72.0 69.0 71.0 72.0 74.0 70.0 74.0 75.0 75.0 71.0 67.0 66.0 70.0 67.0 69.0 70.0 71.0 67.0 70.0 71.0 71.0 68.0 65.0 64.0 67.0 64.0 67.0 67.0 67.0 64.0 67.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 62.0 61.0 65.0 63.0 65.0 64.0 65.0 63.0 65.0 65.0 64.0 62.0 60.0 59.0 60.0 59.0 61.0 60.0 60.0 59.0 60.0 60.0 59.0 58.0 56.0 55.0 56.0 55.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 53.0 51.0 50.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 48.0 46.0 47.0 49.0 49.0 47.0 42.0 39.0 49.0 45.0 44.0 43.0 46.0 44.0 45.0 46.0 47.0 44.0 39.0 36.0 46.0 42.0 41.0 36.0 39.0 41.0 41.0 42.0 43.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 63.8 60.3 61.4 63.9 63.1 60.1 63.1 62.9 62.9 62.7 57.6 55.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.8 60.3 61.4 63.9 63.1 60.1 63.1 62.9 62.9 62.7 57.6 55.9 Evening 19 20 21 56.1 53.6 53.1 83.6 76.4 79.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 63.0 66.0 61.0 61.0 58.0 64.0 58.0 58.0 55.0 56.0 56.0 53.0 52.0 50.0 47.0 46.0 43.0 42.0 37.0 37.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 56.1 53.6 53.1 5.0 5.0 5.0 61.1 58.6 58.1 Night 22 46.5 68.0 36.2 58.0 56.0 52.0 50.0 41.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 46.5 10.0 56.5 23 42.7 59.1 36.2 55.0 53.0 49.0 45.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.7 10.0 52.7 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ea 55.9 63.9 62.0 73.8 90.7 36.2 44.5 Ave age: L1% 66.0 75.0 71.3 L2% 64.0 71.0 68.6 L5% 61.0 68.0 65.3 L8% 59.0 65.0 63.3 L25% 55.0 61.0 58.9 L50% 51.0 57.0 55.1 L90% 39.0 50.0 46.5 L95% 36.0 49.0 44.0 L99% 36.0 46.0 40.2 Min Evening Max Energy Average 53.1 56.1 54.5 76.4 36.2 83.6 36.2 Ave age: 61.0 66.0 63.3 58.0 55.0 64.0 58.0 61.0 57.0 53.0 56.0 55.0 47.0 52.0 49.7 42.0 46.0 43.7 37.0 39.0 37.7 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Night Min 35.9 50.2 Max 62.9 85.3 Energy Average X5.6 36.2 46.0 Ave age: 42.0 41.0 39.0 73.0 70.0 67.0 58.8 56.4 52.7 37.0 65.0 49.9 36.0 61.0 44.1 36.0 57.0 41.4 36.0 50.0 38.7 36.0 49.0 38.2 36.0 47.0 37.3 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 59.9 61.2 55.6 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 63.6 \\Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L3 L 109 URBAN m 1O al W4 m W c Lc N LO 46 N 0 r- in iO Mi• o in m o Roo 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Hour Beginning 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 39.5 35.9 42.0 48.8 54.6 59.4 62.9 56.6 50.2 63.3 74.1 72.6 79.5 85.3 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 46.0 51.0 42.0 54.0 60.0 67.0 69.0 73.0 49.0 41.0 52.0 57.0 63.0 67.0 70.0 44.0 39.0 46.0 53.0 60.0 64.0 67.0 41.0 37.0 41.0 50.0 58.0 62.0 65.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 52.0 58.0 61.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 55.0 57.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 46.0 50.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 49.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 47.0 39.5 35.9 42.0 48.8 54.6 59.4 62.9 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 49.5 45.9 52.0 58.8 64.6 69.4 72.9 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 63.8 60.3 61.4 63.9 63.1 60.1 63.1 62.9 62.9 62.7 57.6 55.9 89.4 82.8 80.5 90.7 84.5 79.9 85.5 83.7 84.1 89.1 78.0 73.8 44.5 39.2 39.2 36.2 36.2 39.1 40.0 40.0 40.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 72.0 69.0 71.0 72.0 74.0 70.0 74.0 75.0 75.0 71.0 67.0 66.0 70.0 67.0 69.0 70.0 71.0 67.0 70.0 71.0 71.0 68.0 65.0 64.0 67.0 64.0 67.0 67.0 67.0 64.0 67.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 62.0 61.0 65.0 63.0 65.0 64.0 65.0 63.0 65.0 65.0 64.0 62.0 60.0 59.0 60.0 59.0 61.0 60.0 60.0 59.0 60.0 60.0 59.0 58.0 56.0 55.0 56.0 55.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 53.0 51.0 50.0 47.0 47.0 47.0 48.0 46.0 47.0 49.0 49.0 47.0 42.0 39.0 49.0 45.0 44.0 43.0 46.0 44.0 45.0 46.0 47.0 44.0 39.0 36.0 46.0 42.0 41.0 36.0 39.0 41.0 41.0 42.0 43.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 63.8 60.3 61.4 63.9 63.1 60.1 63.1 62.9 62.9 62.7 57.6 55.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 63.8 60.3 61.4 63.9 63.1 60.1 63.1 62.9 62.9 62.7 57.6 55.9 Evening 19 20 21 56.1 53.6 53.1 83.6 76.4 79.2 36.2 36.2 36.2 63.0 66.0 61.0 61.0 58.0 64.0 58.0 58.0 55.0 56.0 56.0 53.0 52.0 50.0 47.0 46.0 43.0 42.0 37.0 37.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 56.1 53.6 53.1 5.0 5.0 5.0 61.1 58.6 58.1 Night 22 46.5 68.0 36.2 58.0 56.0 52.0 50.0 41.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 46.5 10.0 56.5 23 42.7 59.1 36.2 55.0 53.0 49.0 45.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.7 10.0 52.7 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ea 55.9 63.9 62.0 73.8 90.7 36.2 44.5 Ave age: L1% 66.0 75.0 71.3 L2% 64.0 71.0 68.6 L5% 61.0 68.0 65.3 L8% 59.0 65.0 63.3 L25% 55.0 61.0 58.9 L50% 51.0 57.0 55.1 L90% 39.0 50.0 46.5 L95% 36.0 49.0 44.0 L99% 36.0 46.0 40.2 Min Evening Max Energy Average 53.1 56.1 54.5 76.4 36.2 83.6 36.2 Ave age: 61.0 66.0 63.3 58.0 55.0 64.0 58.0 61.0 57.0 53.0 56.0 55.0 47.0 52.0 49.7 42.0 46.0 43.7 37.0 39.0 37.7 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Night Min 35.9 50.2 Max 62.9 85.3 Energy Average X5.6 36.2 46.0 Ave age: 42.0 41.0 39.0 73.0 70.0 67.0 58.8 56.4 52.7 37.0 65.0 49.9 36.0 61.0 44.1 36.0 57.0 41.4 36.0 50.0 38.7 36.0 49.0 38.2 36.0 47.0 37.3 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 59.9 61.2 55.6 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 63.6 \\Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L3 L 109 URBAN 24 -Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 Project: 1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain L4 - Located on the southeast corner of 58th Ave. and Location: Madison St. Meter: Piccolo I JN: 12642 Analyst: P. Mara Hourly L e, dBA Readings (unadjusted) 85.0 80.0 75.0 a 70.0 Q 65.0 60.0 - 55.0 3 50.0 o 45.0 = 40.0 35.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 46.5 45.2 44.1 46.2 53.5 56.9 59.8 59.1 50.8 60.7 65.0 69.7 77.2 81.8 35.0 36.4 35.0 35.0 35.4 41.8 45.7 52.0 48.0 54.0 59.0 65.0 66.0 66.0 50.0 47.0 52.0 56.0 62.0 64.0 65.0 48.0 47.0 48.0 51.0 60.0 61.0 63.0 47.0 46.0 46.0 49.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 46.0 45.0 44.0 41.0 51.0 56.0 59.0 46.0 45.0 39.0 38.0 45.0 53.0 56.0 44.0 43.0 35.0 35.0 38.0 46.0 51.0 39.0 41.0 35.0 35.0 38.0 45.0 50.0 36.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 37.0 42.0 48.0 46.5 45.2 44.1 46.2 53.5 56.9 59.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 56.5 55.2 54.1 56.2 63.5 66.9 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 58.0 54.5 54.1 53.0 54.4 51.8 51.7 52.5 52.5 56.6 55.5 56.3 77.8 66.0 67.7 70.4 77.2 69.4 70.1 72.3 67.8 82.2 77.8 76.2 46.8 40.8 39.8 37.4 37.9 38.0 38.0 38.0 39.7 37.3 37.9 38.0 66.0 62.0 63.0 62.0 63.0 61.0 61.0 62.0 61.0 66.0 68.0 66.0 63.0 61.0 61.0 60.0 61.0 58.0 59.0 60.0 59.0 62.0 62.0 63.0 61.0 59.0 59.0 58.0 58.0 56.0 56.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 59.0 60.0 60.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 56.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 57.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 53.0 51.0 52.0 52.0 53.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 51.0 51.0 49.0 49.0 47.0 47.0 48.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 51.0 50.0 46.0 43.0 42.0 42.0 41.0 41.0 42.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 43.0 49.0 45.0 42.0 40.0 41.0 40.0 40.0 41.0 42.0 39.0 39.0 40.0 48.0 42.0 40.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 39.0 39.0 40.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 58.0 54.5 54.1 53.0 54.4 51.8 51.7 52.5 52.5 56.6 55.5 56.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.0 54.5 54.1 53.0 54.4 51.8 51.7 52.5 52.5 56.6 55.5 56.3 Evening 19 55.6 77.7 37.9 62.0 61.0 58.0 57.0 54.0 52.0 51.0 50.0 39.0 55.6 5.0 60.6 20 53.7 66.3 43.3 60.0 59.0 57.0 56.0 53.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 49.0 53.7 5.0 58.7 21 51.2 69.9 37.7 60.0 58.0 55.0 54.0 52.0 46.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 51.2 5.0 56.2 Night 22 48.2 62.9 35.0 59.0 59.0 57.0 52.0 42.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 I 48.2 10.0 58.2 23 J 42.8 59.4 35.0 55.0 52.0 47.0 45.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 42.8 10.0 52.8 Timeframe Hour L ea L L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% Day Min Max 51.7 58.0 66.0 82.2 37.3 46.8 61.0 68.0 58.0 63.0 56.0 61.0 55.0 60.0 51.0 57.0 47.0 54.0 41.0 50.0 39.0 49.0 Energy Average 54.7 Ave age: 63.4 60.8 58.2 56.9 53.5 49.5 42.9 41.5 38.0 48.0 39.7 Evening Min Max 51.2 55.6 66.3 77.7 37.7 43.3 60.0 62.0 58.0 61.0 55.0 58.0 54.0 57.0 52.0 54.0 46.0 52.0 38.0 51.0 38.0 51.0 38.0 49.0 Energy Average 53.9 Ave age: 60.7 59.3 56.7 55.7 53.0 50.0 46.7 46.3 42.0 Night Min Max 42.8 59.8 50.8 81.8 35.0 45.7 48.0 66.0 47.0 65.0 47.0 63.0 45.0 62.0 39.0 59.0 37.0 56.0 35.0 51.0 35.0 50.0 35.0 48.0 Energy Average 53.2 Ave age: 58.2 56.3 53.6 51.7 47.0 44.1 40.2 39.2 37.9 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 54.1 54.5 53.2 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 60.1 \\Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L4 H 110 0 CROssaosaos URBAN in 111 0 1afl- ei 111-M u1 N -'i 1n- 'i 111-111-111- fV fV to rp an - N M in N N !� 00L-"'1-o-a-oo-n-111-111_1p an N 'i 10a N 00 a 00 A�-� �- 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 46.5 45.2 44.1 46.2 53.5 56.9 59.8 59.1 50.8 60.7 65.0 69.7 77.2 81.8 35.0 36.4 35.0 35.0 35.4 41.8 45.7 52.0 48.0 54.0 59.0 65.0 66.0 66.0 50.0 47.0 52.0 56.0 62.0 64.0 65.0 48.0 47.0 48.0 51.0 60.0 61.0 63.0 47.0 46.0 46.0 49.0 58.0 60.0 62.0 46.0 45.0 44.0 41.0 51.0 56.0 59.0 46.0 45.0 39.0 38.0 45.0 53.0 56.0 44.0 43.0 35.0 35.0 38.0 46.0 51.0 39.0 41.0 35.0 35.0 38.0 45.0 50.0 36.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 37.0 42.0 48.0 46.5 45.2 44.1 46.2 53.5 56.9 59.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 56.5 55.2 54.1 56.2 63.5 66.9 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 58.0 54.5 54.1 53.0 54.4 51.8 51.7 52.5 52.5 56.6 55.5 56.3 77.8 66.0 67.7 70.4 77.2 69.4 70.1 72.3 67.8 82.2 77.8 76.2 46.8 40.8 39.8 37.4 37.9 38.0 38.0 38.0 39.7 37.3 37.9 38.0 66.0 62.0 63.0 62.0 63.0 61.0 61.0 62.0 61.0 66.0 68.0 66.0 63.0 61.0 61.0 60.0 61.0 58.0 59.0 60.0 59.0 62.0 62.0 63.0 61.0 59.0 59.0 58.0 58.0 56.0 56.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 59.0 60.0 60.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 56.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 57.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 53.0 51.0 52.0 52.0 53.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 54.0 51.0 51.0 49.0 49.0 47.0 47.0 48.0 49.0 49.0 49.0 51.0 50.0 46.0 43.0 42.0 42.0 41.0 41.0 42.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 43.0 49.0 45.0 42.0 40.0 41.0 40.0 40.0 41.0 42.0 39.0 39.0 40.0 48.0 42.0 40.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 39.0 39.0 40.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 58.0 54.5 54.1 53.0 54.4 51.8 51.7 52.5 52.5 56.6 55.5 56.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 58.0 54.5 54.1 53.0 54.4 51.8 51.7 52.5 52.5 56.6 55.5 56.3 Evening 19 55.6 77.7 37.9 62.0 61.0 58.0 57.0 54.0 52.0 51.0 50.0 39.0 55.6 5.0 60.6 20 53.7 66.3 43.3 60.0 59.0 57.0 56.0 53.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 49.0 53.7 5.0 58.7 21 51.2 69.9 37.7 60.0 58.0 55.0 54.0 52.0 46.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 51.2 5.0 56.2 Night 22 48.2 62.9 35.0 59.0 59.0 57.0 52.0 42.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 I 48.2 10.0 58.2 23 J 42.8 59.4 35.0 55.0 52.0 47.0 45.0 39.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 42.8 10.0 52.8 Timeframe Hour L ea L L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% Day Min Max 51.7 58.0 66.0 82.2 37.3 46.8 61.0 68.0 58.0 63.0 56.0 61.0 55.0 60.0 51.0 57.0 47.0 54.0 41.0 50.0 39.0 49.0 Energy Average 54.7 Ave age: 63.4 60.8 58.2 56.9 53.5 49.5 42.9 41.5 38.0 48.0 39.7 Evening Min Max 51.2 55.6 66.3 77.7 37.7 43.3 60.0 62.0 58.0 61.0 55.0 58.0 54.0 57.0 52.0 54.0 46.0 52.0 38.0 51.0 38.0 51.0 38.0 49.0 Energy Average 53.9 Ave age: 60.7 59.3 56.7 55.7 53.0 50.0 46.7 46.3 42.0 Night Min Max 42.8 59.8 50.8 81.8 35.0 45.7 48.0 66.0 47.0 65.0 47.0 63.0 45.0 62.0 39.0 59.0 37.0 56.0 35.0 51.0 35.0 50.0 35.0 48.0 Energy Average 53.2 Ave age: 58.2 56.3 53.6 51.7 47.0 44.1 40.2 39.2 37.9 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 54.1 54.5 53.2 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 60.1 \\Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L4 H 110 0 CROssaosaos URBAN 24 -Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 Project: 1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain L5 - Located south of 58th Ave. outside the northwest corner Location: of the Analusia Country Club. Meter: Piccolo 1 JN: 12642 Analyst: P. Mara Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted) 85.0 80.0 m 75.0 a 70.0 Q 65.0 60.0 - 55.0 3 50.0 o 45.0 = 40.0 35.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 37.6 40.2 37.2 43.9 55.3 62.8 61.1 42.8 63.6 44.5 72.7 78.7 81.3 81.4 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 40.3 39.0 45.0 39.0 46.0 68.0 74.0 74.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 40.0 66.0 73.0 72.0 39.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 60.0 70.0 67.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 54.0 68.0 63.0 38.0 38.0 37.0 36.0 43.0 57.0 51.0 37.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 38.0 49.0 47.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 40.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 38.0 41.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 37.0 40.0 37.6 40.2 37.2 43.9 55.3 62.8 61.1 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 47.6 50.2 47.2 53.9 65.3 72.8 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 65.6 62.8 58.9 61.2 60.9 62.0 60.4 59.4 59.1 56.7 50.2 46.7 81.6 81.6 77.5 80.8 84.5 86.0 82.4 78.0 78.9 78.8 71.6 69.9 38.6 40.0 38.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 77.0 75.0 71.0 73.0 73.0 74.0 72.0 72.0 71.0 70.0 65.0 56.0 76.0 73.0 69.0 71.0 72.0 71.0 70.0 70.0 69.0 68.0 60.0 52.0 73.0 69.0 65.0 68.0 68.0 66.0 66.0 67.0 66.0 62.0 51.0 50.0 71.0 66.0 62.0 66.0 65.0 63.0 64.0 64.0 63.0 56.0 47.0 48.0 58.0 55.0 56.0 51.0 50.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 42.0 40.0 41.0 47.0 50.0 50.0 40.0 42.0 42.0 44.0 40.0 41.0 37.0 36.0 40.0 41.0 42.0 44.0 35.0 38.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 40.0 41.0 43.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 38.0 40.0 41.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 65.6 62.8 58.9 61.2 60.9 62.0 60.4 59.4 59.1 56.7 50.2 46.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.6 62.8 58.9 61.2 60.9 62.0 60.4 59.4 59.1 56.7 50.2 46.7 Evening 19 51.1 20 39.5 21 50.1 77.7 35.7 62.0 56.0 48.0 49.2 35.7 44.0 44.0 42.0 74.6 35.7 64.0 59.0 49.0 46.0 41.0 45.0 42.0 40.0 38.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 I 51.1 39.5 50.1 5.0 5.0 5.0 56.1 44.5 55.1 Night 22 48.7 74.0 35.7 56.0 50.0 49.0 48.0 46.0 40.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 I 48.7 10.0 58.7 23 J 44.0 48.8 35.7 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 44.0 44.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 44.0 10.0 54.0 Timeframe Hour L ea L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% Day Min 46.7 69.9 Max 65.6 86.0 35.7 56.0 40.0 77.0 52.0 76.0 50.0 73.0 47.0 71.0 40.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 58.0 50.0 44.0 43.0 Energy Average 60.6 Ave age: 70.8 68.4 64.3 61.3 35.0 41.0 49.2 42.4 37.3 36.6 36.2 Evening Min Max Energy Average 39.5 51.1 49.0 49.2 35.7 77.7 35.7 Ave age: 44.0 44.0 64.0 59.0 56.7 53.0 42.0 49.0 46.3 41.0 46.0 44.0 38.0 42.0 40.0 36.0 40.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Night Min 37.2 42.8 Max 62.8 81.4 35.7 39.0 40.3 74.0 39.0 73.0 38.0 38.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 70.0 68.0 57.0 49.0 42.0 41.0 Energy Average 56.1 Ave age: 54.0 51.4 49.3 47.8 43.3 40.1 36.3 36.0 35.0 40.0 35.8 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 58.7 59.7 56.1 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 63.3 I \Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600112642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L5 I 111 URBAN - cn ID 0 N - -_ I::_ CO N � O1 - - IIff - N ID a IO _ et m N - m - IC In N _ - in n et N in N O ID N N a1 M ci N et I'n m in ii 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 37.6 40.2 37.2 43.9 55.3 62.8 61.1 42.8 63.6 44.5 72.7 78.7 81.3 81.4 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 40.3 39.0 45.0 39.0 46.0 68.0 74.0 74.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 40.0 66.0 73.0 72.0 39.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 60.0 70.0 67.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 38.0 54.0 68.0 63.0 38.0 38.0 37.0 36.0 43.0 57.0 51.0 37.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 38.0 49.0 47.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 40.0 42.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 38.0 41.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 37.0 40.0 37.6 40.2 37.2 43.9 55.3 62.8 61.1 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 47.6 50.2 47.2 53.9 65.3 72.8 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 65.6 62.8 58.9 61.2 60.9 62.0 60.4 59.4 59.1 56.7 50.2 46.7 81.6 81.6 77.5 80.8 84.5 86.0 82.4 78.0 78.9 78.8 71.6 69.9 38.6 40.0 38.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 35.7 77.0 75.0 71.0 73.0 73.0 74.0 72.0 72.0 71.0 70.0 65.0 56.0 76.0 73.0 69.0 71.0 72.0 71.0 70.0 70.0 69.0 68.0 60.0 52.0 73.0 69.0 65.0 68.0 68.0 66.0 66.0 67.0 66.0 62.0 51.0 50.0 71.0 66.0 62.0 66.0 65.0 63.0 64.0 64.0 63.0 56.0 47.0 48.0 58.0 55.0 56.0 51.0 50.0 48.0 53.0 48.0 48.0 42.0 40.0 41.0 47.0 50.0 50.0 40.0 42.0 42.0 44.0 40.0 41.0 37.0 36.0 40.0 41.0 42.0 44.0 35.0 38.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 40.0 41.0 43.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 38.0 40.0 41.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 65.6 62.8 58.9 61.2 60.9 62.0 60.4 59.4 59.1 56.7 50.2 46.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 65.6 62.8 58.9 61.2 60.9 62.0 60.4 59.4 59.1 56.7 50.2 46.7 Evening 19 51.1 20 39.5 21 50.1 77.7 35.7 62.0 56.0 48.0 49.2 35.7 44.0 44.0 42.0 74.6 35.7 64.0 59.0 49.0 46.0 41.0 45.0 42.0 40.0 38.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 I 51.1 39.5 50.1 5.0 5.0 5.0 56.1 44.5 55.1 Night 22 48.7 74.0 35.7 56.0 50.0 49.0 48.0 46.0 40.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 I 48.7 10.0 58.7 23 J 44.0 48.8 35.7 45.0 45.0 45.0 45.0 44.0 44.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 44.0 10.0 54.0 Timeframe Hour L ea L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% Day Min 46.7 69.9 Max 65.6 86.0 35.7 56.0 40.0 77.0 52.0 76.0 50.0 73.0 47.0 71.0 40.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 58.0 50.0 44.0 43.0 Energy Average 60.6 Ave age: 70.8 68.4 64.3 61.3 35.0 41.0 49.2 42.4 37.3 36.6 36.2 Evening Min Max Energy Average 39.5 51.1 49.0 49.2 35.7 77.7 35.7 Ave age: 44.0 44.0 64.0 59.0 56.7 53.0 42.0 49.0 46.3 41.0 46.0 44.0 38.0 42.0 40.0 36.0 40.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 Night Min 37.2 42.8 Max 62.8 81.4 35.7 39.0 40.3 74.0 39.0 73.0 38.0 38.0 36.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 70.0 68.0 57.0 49.0 42.0 41.0 Energy Average 56.1 Ave age: 54.0 51.4 49.3 47.8 43.3 40.1 36.3 36.0 35.0 40.0 35.8 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 58.7 59.7 56.1 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 63.3 I \Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600112642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L5 I 111 URBAN 24 -Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 Project: 1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain L6 - Located along CII Conchita southeast of home at 80900 Location: CII Conchita. Meter: Piccolo I JN: 12642 Analyst: P. Mara Hourly L e, dBA Readings (unadjusted) 85.0 80.0 75.0 a 70.0 Q 65.0 60.0 - 55.0 `5 50.0 o 45.0 = 40.0 35.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 41.4 45.9 46.4 49.8 54.8 60.0 62.5 63.8 66.9 69.8 73.5 75.1 76.9 85.9 34.8 34.8 34.8 35.6 37.6 37.8 43.1 49.0 58.0 60.0 64.0 67.0 70.0 71.0 43.0 56.0 53.0 58.0 65.0 69.0 70.0 41.0 53.0 45.0 50.0 61.0 67.0 68.0 40.0 48.0 44.0 45.0 58.0 65.0 66.0 37.0 39.0 39.0 40.0 46.0 58.0 61.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 41.0 50.0 55.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 37.0 37.0 41.0 49.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 37.0 37.0 40.0 48.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 36.0 37.0 39.0 44.0 41.4 45.9 46.4 49.8 54.8 60.0 62.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 51.4 55.9 56.4 59.8 64.8 70.0 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 59.8 59.0 58.9 57.9 58.2 58.3 58.3 59.6 60.1 59.6 59.5 60.7 75.9 72.8 73.4 73.9 78.8 73.6 73.4 73.0 74.5 75.9 74.4 80.2 44.3 44.1 39.5 39.4 37.8 37.8 40.7 39.6 37.8 34.8 34.8 37.7 70.0 68.0 68.0 67.0 67.0 68.0 67.0 68.0 69.0 69.0 69.0 71.0 68.0 67.0 67.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 67.0 69.0 69.0 66.0 65.0 65.0 64.0 64.0 64.0 64.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 67.0 64.0 64.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 66.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 59.0 60.0 61.0 60.0 58.0 56.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 50.0 50.0 51.0 51.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 49.0 47.0 48.0 47.0 43.0 42.0 41.0 42.0 44.0 42.0 40.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 47.0 46.0 41.0 41.0 40.0 40.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 46.0 45.0 39.0 40.0 38.0 37.0 41.0 40.0 38.0 37.0 35.0 37.0 59.8 59.0 58.9 57.9 58.2 58.3 58.3 59.6 60.1 59.6 59.5 60.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.8 59.0 58.9 57.9 58.2 58.3 58.3 59.6 60.1 59.6 59.5 60.7 Evening 19 20 21 56.2 54.5 54.6 71.7 71.3 75.6 34.8 34.8 34.8 67.0 67.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 66.0 62.0 66.0 59.0 62.0 58.0 54.0 53.0 46.0 39.0 44.0 39.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 35.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 I 56.2 54.5 54.6 5.0 5.0 5.0 61.2 59.5 59.6 Night 22 51.5 75.0 34.8 66.0 62.0 51.0 46.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 51.5 10.0 61.5 23 _ 46.4 71.9 34.8 57.0 49.0 40.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 46.4 10.0 56.4 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ee 57.9 60.7 59.2 72.8 80.2 L m 34.8 44.3 Ave age: L1% 67.0 71.0 68.4 L2% 66.0 69.0 67.2 L5% 64.0 67.0 65.3 L8% 63.0 66.0 64.1 L25% 56.0 61.0 58.8 L50% 47.0 53.0 50.9 L90% 39.0 48.0 42.2 L95% 37.0 47.0 40.8 L99% 35.0 46.0 39.4 Min Evening Max Energy Average 54.5 56.2 55.2 71.3 34.8 75.6 34.8 Ave age: 67.0 68.0 67.3 66.0 66.0 66.0 59.0 64.0 61.7 54.0 62.0 58.0 39.0 53.0 46.0 37.0 44.0 40.0 35.0 37.0 36.3 35.0 37.0 35.7 35.0 35.0 35.0 Night Min 41.4 63.8 Max 62.5 85.9 34.8 49.0 43.1 71.0 43.0 70.0 40.0 38.0 35.0 68.0 66.0 61.0 35.0 55.0 35.0 35.0 49.0 48.0 Energy Average 55.8 Ave age: 62.4 58.3 52.9 50.0 43.6 40.4 37.7 37.4 35.0 44.0 36.8 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 57.8 58.7 55.8 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 63.0 I \Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L6 N 112 0 CROssaosaos URBAN O u1 - a1 in - in in - N 00 of - m - Ca u1 m OaO1 u1 l0 of -1 Lo 'q u1 in in r co - - v u1 Tr 1:n I 00 inN a of et 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 41.4 45.9 46.4 49.8 54.8 60.0 62.5 63.8 66.9 69.8 73.5 75.1 76.9 85.9 34.8 34.8 34.8 35.6 37.6 37.8 43.1 49.0 58.0 60.0 64.0 67.0 70.0 71.0 43.0 56.0 53.0 58.0 65.0 69.0 70.0 41.0 53.0 45.0 50.0 61.0 67.0 68.0 40.0 48.0 44.0 45.0 58.0 65.0 66.0 37.0 39.0 39.0 40.0 46.0 58.0 61.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 41.0 50.0 55.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 37.0 37.0 41.0 49.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 37.0 37.0 40.0 48.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 36.0 37.0 39.0 44.0 41.4 45.9 46.4 49.8 54.8 60.0 62.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 51.4 55.9 56.4 59.8 64.8 70.0 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 59.8 59.0 58.9 57.9 58.2 58.3 58.3 59.6 60.1 59.6 59.5 60.7 75.9 72.8 73.4 73.9 78.8 73.6 73.4 73.0 74.5 75.9 74.4 80.2 44.3 44.1 39.5 39.4 37.8 37.8 40.7 39.6 37.8 34.8 34.8 37.7 70.0 68.0 68.0 67.0 67.0 68.0 67.0 68.0 69.0 69.0 69.0 71.0 68.0 67.0 67.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 67.0 68.0 67.0 69.0 69.0 66.0 65.0 65.0 64.0 64.0 64.0 64.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 66.0 67.0 64.0 64.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 63.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 65.0 66.0 59.0 59.0 59.0 58.0 58.0 58.0 59.0 60.0 61.0 60.0 58.0 56.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 50.0 50.0 51.0 51.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 49.0 47.0 48.0 47.0 43.0 42.0 41.0 42.0 44.0 42.0 40.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 47.0 46.0 41.0 41.0 40.0 40.0 43.0 41.0 39.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 46.0 45.0 39.0 40.0 38.0 37.0 41.0 40.0 38.0 37.0 35.0 37.0 59.8 59.0 58.9 57.9 58.2 58.3 58.3 59.6 60.1 59.6 59.5 60.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 59.8 59.0 58.9 57.9 58.2 58.3 58.3 59.6 60.1 59.6 59.5 60.7 Evening 19 20 21 56.2 54.5 54.6 71.7 71.3 75.6 34.8 34.8 34.8 67.0 67.0 68.0 66.0 64.0 66.0 62.0 66.0 59.0 62.0 58.0 54.0 53.0 46.0 39.0 44.0 39.0 37.0 37.0 37.0 35.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 I 56.2 54.5 54.6 5.0 5.0 5.0 61.2 59.5 59.6 Night 22 51.5 75.0 34.8 66.0 62.0 51.0 46.0 37.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 51.5 10.0 61.5 23 _ 46.4 71.9 34.8 57.0 49.0 40.0 38.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 35.0 46.4 10.0 56.4 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ee 57.9 60.7 59.2 72.8 80.2 L m 34.8 44.3 Ave age: L1% 67.0 71.0 68.4 L2% 66.0 69.0 67.2 L5% 64.0 67.0 65.3 L8% 63.0 66.0 64.1 L25% 56.0 61.0 58.8 L50% 47.0 53.0 50.9 L90% 39.0 48.0 42.2 L95% 37.0 47.0 40.8 L99% 35.0 46.0 39.4 Min Evening Max Energy Average 54.5 56.2 55.2 71.3 34.8 75.6 34.8 Ave age: 67.0 68.0 67.3 66.0 66.0 66.0 59.0 64.0 61.7 54.0 62.0 58.0 39.0 53.0 46.0 37.0 44.0 40.0 35.0 37.0 36.3 35.0 37.0 35.7 35.0 35.0 35.0 Night Min 41.4 63.8 Max 62.5 85.9 34.8 49.0 43.1 71.0 43.0 70.0 40.0 38.0 35.0 68.0 66.0 61.0 35.0 55.0 35.0 35.0 49.0 48.0 Energy Average 55.8 Ave age: 62.4 58.3 52.9 50.0 43.6 40.4 37.7 37.4 35.0 44.0 36.8 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 57.8 58.7 55.8 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 63.0 I \Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L6 N 112 0 CROssaosaos URBAN 24 -Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 Project: 1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Location: family homes. L7 - Located along 60th Ave. north of gated entrace to single Meter: Piccolo 1 JN: 12642 Analyst: P. Mara Hourly L e. dBA Readings (unadjusted) 85.0 80.0 75.0 a 70.0 Q 65.0 60.0 - 55.0 3 50.0 o 45.0 = 40.0 35.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour Lea L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 56.2 55.5 54.9 55.4 56.0 55.9 57.5 58.8 57.9 57.4 63.8 59.9 67.8 78.4 52.3 52.1 51.7 52.9 52.7 52.7 53.3 58.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 60.0 64.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 58.0 58.0 62.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 58.0 57.0 59.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 57.0 56.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 54.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 56.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 54.0 53.0 54.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 52.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 54.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 56.2 55.5 54.9 55.4 56.0 55.9 57.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 66.2 65.5 64.9 65.4 66.0 65.9 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 60.6 60.2 58.6 54.5 54.0 56.0 58.2 61.3 54.2 58.3 57.8 57.4 86.4 74.4 75.6 64.2 69.0 74.1 65.8 85.9 68.1 84.6 68.2 71.6 52.9 53.2 52.0 52.3 50.6 50.8 54.1 51.9 51.3 52.5 54.0 53.6 66.0 64.0 65.0 57.0 62.0 62.0 64.0 67.0 60.0 65.0 61.0 62.0 64.0 63.0 63.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 64.0 64.0 59.0 61.0 60.0 59.0 60.0 62.0 62.0 56.0 55.0 59.0 63.0 63.0 57.0 57.0 59.0 58.0 59.0 62.0 62.0 56.0 55.0 58.0 63.0 62.0 56.0 57.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 61.0 60.0 55.0 53.0 56.0 58.0 59.0 53.0 56.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 59.0 55.0 54.0 52.0 55.0 56.0 57.0 53.0 54.0 57.0 57.0 55.0 56.0 53.0 53.0 51.0 52.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 53.0 56.0 55.0 54.0 55.0 53.0 53.0 51.0 51.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 53.0 55.0 55.0 53.0 54.0 52.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 54.0 52.0 51.0 52.0 54.0 53.0 60.6 60.2 58.6 54.5 54.0 56.0 58.2 61.3 54.2 58.3 57.8 57.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.6 60.2 58.6 54.5 54.0 56.0 58.2 61.3 54.2 58.3 57.8 57.4 Evening 19 20 21 56.1 55.5 57.0 63.0 60.9 65.6 52.7 52.0 53.1 58.0 57.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 56.0 56.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 57.0 54.0 53.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 55.0 53.0 52.0 53.0 I 56.1 55.5 57.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 61.1 60.5 62.0 Night 22 56.7 58.8 53.8 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 54.0 56.7 10.0 66.7 23 56.1 58.5 52.2 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 56.1 10.0 66.1 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average Lee 54.0 61.3 58.2 64.2 86.4 Le 50.6 54.1 Ave age: L1% 57.0 67.0 62.9 L2% 56.0 64.0 60.9 L5% 55.0 63.0 59.3 L8% 55.0 63.0 58.8 L25% 53.0 61.0 56.9 L50% 52.0 59.0 55.5 L90% 51.0 56.0 53.6 L95% 51.0 55.0 53.3 L99% 51.0 54.0 52.4 Min Evening Max Energy Average 55.5 57.0 56.2 60.9 52.0 65.6 53.1 Ave age: 57.0 58.0 57.7 57.0 57.0 58.0 58.0 57.3 57.3 57.0 58.0 57.3 56.0 57.0 56.3 55.0 57.0 56.0 53.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 55.0 54.0 52.0 53.0 52.7 Night Min 54.9 57.4 Max 57.5 78.4 Energy Average 56.1 51.7 53.8 Ave age: 57.0 64.0 58.4 56.0 56.0 62.0 59.0 57.9 57.1 56.0 58.0 56.9 55.0 57.0 56.1 54.0 56.0 55.3 52.0 55.0 53.7 52.0 55.0 53.1 52.0 54.0 52.7 L ee (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 57.3 57.9 56.1 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 63.1 I \Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600112642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L7 T 113 URBAN vci 1n - lr'- l0 N -in MMMMMM O N LI c:�C - _ 1n MMMMMM 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour Lea L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 56.2 55.5 54.9 55.4 56.0 55.9 57.5 58.8 57.9 57.4 63.8 59.9 67.8 78.4 52.3 52.1 51.7 52.9 52.7 52.7 53.3 58.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 60.0 64.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 58.0 58.0 62.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 58.0 57.0 59.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 56.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 57.0 56.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 54.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 56.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 54.0 53.0 54.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 52.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 54.0 52.0 52.0 52.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 56.2 55.5 54.9 55.4 56.0 55.9 57.5 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 66.2 65.5 64.9 65.4 66.0 65.9 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 60.6 60.2 58.6 54.5 54.0 56.0 58.2 61.3 54.2 58.3 57.8 57.4 86.4 74.4 75.6 64.2 69.0 74.1 65.8 85.9 68.1 84.6 68.2 71.6 52.9 53.2 52.0 52.3 50.6 50.8 54.1 51.9 51.3 52.5 54.0 53.6 66.0 64.0 65.0 57.0 62.0 62.0 64.0 67.0 60.0 65.0 61.0 62.0 64.0 63.0 63.0 56.0 58.0 60.0 64.0 64.0 59.0 61.0 60.0 59.0 60.0 62.0 62.0 56.0 55.0 59.0 63.0 63.0 57.0 57.0 59.0 58.0 59.0 62.0 62.0 56.0 55.0 58.0 63.0 62.0 56.0 57.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 61.0 60.0 55.0 53.0 56.0 58.0 59.0 53.0 56.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 59.0 55.0 54.0 52.0 55.0 56.0 57.0 53.0 54.0 57.0 57.0 55.0 56.0 53.0 53.0 51.0 52.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 53.0 56.0 55.0 54.0 55.0 53.0 53.0 51.0 51.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 53.0 55.0 55.0 53.0 54.0 52.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 54.0 52.0 51.0 52.0 54.0 53.0 60.6 60.2 58.6 54.5 54.0 56.0 58.2 61.3 54.2 58.3 57.8 57.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 60.6 60.2 58.6 54.5 54.0 56.0 58.2 61.3 54.2 58.3 57.8 57.4 Evening 19 20 21 56.1 55.5 57.0 63.0 60.9 65.6 52.7 52.0 53.1 58.0 57.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 58.0 56.0 56.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 57.0 54.0 53.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 55.0 53.0 52.0 53.0 I 56.1 55.5 57.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 61.1 60.5 62.0 Night 22 56.7 58.8 53.8 58.0 58.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 55.0 55.0 54.0 56.7 10.0 66.7 23 56.1 58.5 52.2 57.0 57.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 56.0 54.0 53.0 52.0 56.1 10.0 66.1 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average Lee 54.0 61.3 58.2 64.2 86.4 Le 50.6 54.1 Ave age: L1% 57.0 67.0 62.9 L2% 56.0 64.0 60.9 L5% 55.0 63.0 59.3 L8% 55.0 63.0 58.8 L25% 53.0 61.0 56.9 L50% 52.0 59.0 55.5 L90% 51.0 56.0 53.6 L95% 51.0 55.0 53.3 L99% 51.0 54.0 52.4 Min Evening Max Energy Average 55.5 57.0 56.2 60.9 52.0 65.6 53.1 Ave age: 57.0 58.0 57.7 57.0 57.0 58.0 58.0 57.3 57.3 57.0 58.0 57.3 56.0 57.0 56.3 55.0 57.0 56.0 53.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 55.0 54.0 52.0 53.0 52.7 Night Min 54.9 57.4 Max 57.5 78.4 Energy Average 56.1 51.7 53.8 Ave age: 57.0 64.0 58.4 56.0 56.0 62.0 59.0 57.9 57.1 56.0 58.0 56.9 55.0 57.0 56.1 54.0 56.0 55.3 52.0 55.0 53.7 52.0 55.0 53.1 52.0 54.0 52.7 L ee (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 57.3 57.9 56.1 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 63.1 I \Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600112642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L7 T 113 URBAN 24 -Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 Project: 1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain L8 - Located towards the western end of 60th Ave. south of Location: home at 80800 60th Ave. Meter: Piccolo 1 JN: 12642 Analyst: P. Mara Hourly L eq dBA Readings (unadjusted) 85.0 80.0 m 75.0 a 70.0 Q 65.0 60.0 - 55.0 3 50.0 o 45.0 = 40.0 35.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 34.9 35.0 35.3 35.6 37.4 42.7 46.4 39.4 41.1 42.3 45.7 47.3 56.1 67.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 39.3 36.0 36.0 38.0 41.0 44.0 53.0 56.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 43.0 50.0 ;,53.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 41.0 47.0 50.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.0 45.0 48.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 45.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 34.9 35.0 35.3 35.6 37.4 42.7 46.4 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 44.9 45.0 45.3 45.6 47.4 52.7 56.4 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 48.9 46.0 41.7 45.9 40.0 45.5 40.9 46.7 42.1 44.5 40.5 39.2 70.0 58.3 60.4 66.5 60.1 67.4 55.2 68.0 56.9 71.7 54.5 52.2 39.3 40.0 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 58.0 54.0 48.0 58.0 49.0 57.0 49.0 58.0 51.0 53.0 50.0 48.0 57.0 53.0 46.0 53.0 46.0 52.0 48.0 56.0 49.0 49.0 48.0 47.0 53.0 50.0 45.0 50.0 43.0 47.0 44.0 50.0 47.0 45.0 46.0 44.0 51.0 49.0 44.0 49.0 41.0 45.0 42.0 48.0 45.0 43.0 43.0 42.0 47.0 46.0 41.0 42.0 38.0 41.0 41.0 43.0 42.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 44.0 43.0 40.0 40.0 36.0 39.0 39.0 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 41.0 41.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 41.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 48.9 46.0 41.7 45.9 40.0 45.5 40.9 46.7 42.1 44.5 40.5 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.9 46.0 41.7 45.9 40.0 45.5 40.9 46.7 42.1 44.5 40.5 39.2 Evening 19 20 21 40.5 38.6 36.4 60.9 58.4 55.8 36.4 36.4 36.4 53.0 47.0 42.0 50.0 45.0 39.0 42.0 40.0 38.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 40.5 38.6 36.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 45.5 43.6 41.4 Night 22 35.4 46.4 36.4 42.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.4 10.0 45.4 23 35.0 42.5 36.4 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.0 10.0 45.0 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ea 39.2 48.9 44.5 52.2 71.7 L 36.4 40.0 Ave age: L1% 48.0 58.0 52.8 L2% 46.0 57.0 50.3 L5% 43.0 53.0 47.0 L8% 41.0 51.0 45.2 L25% 38.0 47.0 41.5 L50% 36.0 44.0 39.1 L90% 36.0 41.0 37.1 L95% 36.0 41.0 36.8 L99% 36.0 41.0 36.8 Min Evening Max Energy Average 36.4 40.5 38.8 55.8 36.4 60.9 36.4 Ave age: 42.0 53.0 48.3 40.0 47.0 44.0 38.0 42.0 39.7 36.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Night Min 34.9 Max 46.4 39.4 67.4 36.4 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.3 56.0 53.0 50.0 48.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 Energy Average 39.9 Ave age: 42.8 40.8 39.3 38.8 37.7 37.1 36.6 36.6 36.0 39.0 36.3 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 42.7 43.8 39.9 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 47.3 \\Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L8 5 114 URBAN o m to a n-0 0111 n a, 0 in of n N v! u± CV u+ to a a 0 V1 V1 in is. 00 N V7 C V7 O iiiN Oa m O CO M t0 V7 M V7 M M M M et et a--aa-a-a-� ��a 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 34.9 35.0 35.3 35.6 37.4 42.7 46.4 39.4 41.1 42.3 45.7 47.3 56.1 67.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 39.3 36.0 36.0 38.0 41.0 44.0 53.0 56.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 43.0 50.0 ;,53.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 41.0 47.0 50.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.0 45.0 48.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 45.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 34.9 35.0 35.3 35.6 37.4 42.7 46.4 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 44.9 45.0 45.3 45.6 47.4 52.7 56.4 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 48.9 46.0 41.7 45.9 40.0 45.5 40.9 46.7 42.1 44.5 40.5 39.2 70.0 58.3 60.4 66.5 60.1 67.4 55.2 68.0 56.9 71.7 54.5 52.2 39.3 40.0 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 36.4 58.0 54.0 48.0 58.0 49.0 57.0 49.0 58.0 51.0 53.0 50.0 48.0 57.0 53.0 46.0 53.0 46.0 52.0 48.0 56.0 49.0 49.0 48.0 47.0 53.0 50.0 45.0 50.0 43.0 47.0 44.0 50.0 47.0 45.0 46.0 44.0 51.0 49.0 44.0 49.0 41.0 45.0 42.0 48.0 45.0 43.0 43.0 42.0 47.0 46.0 41.0 42.0 38.0 41.0 41.0 43.0 42.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 44.0 43.0 40.0 40.0 36.0 39.0 39.0 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 41.0 41.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 41.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 40.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 48.9 46.0 41.7 45.9 40.0 45.5 40.9 46.7 42.1 44.5 40.5 39.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.9 46.0 41.7 45.9 40.0 45.5 40.9 46.7 42.1 44.5 40.5 39.2 Evening 19 20 21 40.5 38.6 36.4 60.9 58.4 55.8 36.4 36.4 36.4 53.0 47.0 42.0 50.0 45.0 39.0 42.0 40.0 38.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 40.5 38.6 36.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 45.5 43.6 41.4 Night 22 35.4 46.4 36.4 42.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.4 10.0 45.4 23 35.0 42.5 36.4 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.0 10.0 45.0 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ea 39.2 48.9 44.5 52.2 71.7 L 36.4 40.0 Ave age: L1% 48.0 58.0 52.8 L2% 46.0 57.0 50.3 L5% 43.0 53.0 47.0 L8% 41.0 51.0 45.2 L25% 38.0 47.0 41.5 L50% 36.0 44.0 39.1 L90% 36.0 41.0 37.1 L95% 36.0 41.0 36.8 L99% 36.0 41.0 36.8 Min Evening Max Energy Average 36.4 40.5 38.8 55.8 36.4 60.9 36.4 Ave age: 42.0 53.0 48.3 40.0 47.0 44.0 38.0 42.0 39.7 36.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Night Min 34.9 Max 46.4 39.4 67.4 36.4 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.3 56.0 53.0 50.0 48.0 45.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 Energy Average 39.9 Ave age: 42.8 40.8 39.3 38.8 37.7 37.1 36.6 36.6 36.0 39.0 36.3 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 42.7 43.8 39.9 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 47.3 \\Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L8 5 114 URBAN 24 -Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 Project: 1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Location: L9 - Located along Jefferson St. north of Quarry Ln. Meter: Piccolo I JN: 12642 Analyst: P. Mara Hourly L e, dBA Readings (unadjusted) 85.0 80.0 m 75.0 a 70.0 Q 65.0 60.0 - 55.0 3 50.0 o 45.0 = 40.0 35.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 35.2 39.1 36.2 36.6 40.8 54.4 55.8 45.0 63.0 45.8 55.3 62.7 83.7 82.8 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 41.1 37.0 50.0 41.0 39.0 52.0 61.0 66.0 36.0 44.0 39.0 38.0 49.0 59.0 62.0 36.0 38.0 39.0 37.0 44.0 55.0 57.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 36.0 41.0 52.0 54.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 49.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 46.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 35.2 39.1 36.2 36.6 40.8 54.4 55.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 45.2 49.1 46.2 46.6 50.8 64.4 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 55.9 51.8 51.1 49.6 51.4 54.4 56.6 51.3 53.4 49.0 44.2 43.2 78.6 72.8 69.8 72.2 71.9 79.8 84.2 74.6 78.0 74.5 69.2 69.5 41.1 39.2 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 68.0 63.0 63.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 64.0 66.0 60.0 56.0 53.0 62.0 60.0 61.0 59.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 60.0 62.0 56.0 52.0 50.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 54.0 56.0 56.0 57.0 55.0 57.0 52.0 47.0 45.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 51.0 54.0 53.0 54.0 52.0 54.0 49.0 44.0 42.0 49.0 49.0 47.0 44.0 46.0 45.0 47.0 44.0 47.0 40.0 39.0 37.0 46.0 45.0 44.0 40.0 42.0 41.0 42.0 41.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 40.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 55.9 51.8 51.1 49.6 51.4 54.4 56.6 51.3 53.4 49.0 44.2 43.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.9 51.8 51.1 49.6 51.4 54.4 56.6 51.3 53.4 49.0 44.2 43.2 Evening 19 50.4 79.7 36.3 59.0 56.0 49.0 20 37.2 51.0 36.3 46.0 42.0 39.0 21 38.9 60.1 36.3 50.0 46.0 40.0 46.0 37.0 38.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 50.4 37.2 38.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 55.4 42.2 43.9 Night 22 40.3 63.2 36.3 51.0 47.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 40.3 10.0 50.3 23 35.5 48.5 36.3 42.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.5 10.0 45.5 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ea 43.2 56.6 52.5 69.2 84.2 36.3 41.1 Ave age: L1% 53.0 68.0 62.8 L2% 50.0 64.0 59.0 L5% 45.0 57.0 54.1 L8% 42.0 55.0 51.3 L25% 37.0 49.0 44.5 L50% 36.0 46.0 40.8 L90% 36.0 43.0 37.5 L95% 36.0 42.0 37.2 L99% 36.0 42.0 36.8 Evening Min Max Energy Average 37.2 50.4 46.1 51.0 36.3 79.7 36.3 Ave age: 46.0 42.0 59.0 56.0 51.7 48.0 39.0 49.0 42.7 37.0 46.0 40.3 36.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Night Min 35.2 45.0 Max 55.8 83.7 36.3 37.0 41.1 66.0 36.0 62.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 57.0 54.0 49.0 36.0 46.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 42.0 Energy Average 48.9 Ave age: 48.8 45.9 42.4 40.7 38.2 37.4 36.8 36.7 36.0 42.0 36.7 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 50.9 51.7 48.9 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 56.0 I \Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L9 G 115 URBAN cn 00 a-1 tin N- to en H -ut-ut-a--a- N N N l0 00 u1 N N ut - to 01 a- a N ut- a m 0 N N a Na) M m m 0, t0 t0 O ' m 01 m O ut n M 00 O II m M Mil Ell 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 35.2 39.1 36.2 36.6 40.8 54.4 55.8 45.0 63.0 45.8 55.3 62.7 83.7 82.8 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 41.1 37.0 50.0 41.0 39.0 52.0 61.0 66.0 36.0 44.0 39.0 38.0 49.0 59.0 62.0 36.0 38.0 39.0 37.0 44.0 55.0 57.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 36.0 41.0 52.0 54.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 49.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 46.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 35.2 39.1 36.2 36.6 40.8 54.4 55.8 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 45.2 49.1 46.2 46.6 50.8 64.4 Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 55.9 51.8 51.1 49.6 51.4 54.4 56.6 51.3 53.4 49.0 44.2 43.2 78.6 72.8 69.8 72.2 71.9 79.8 84.2 74.6 78.0 74.5 69.2 69.5 41.1 39.2 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 36.3 68.0 63.0 63.0 62.0 64.0 66.0 68.0 64.0 66.0 60.0 56.0 53.0 62.0 60.0 61.0 59.0 60.0 62.0 64.0 60.0 62.0 56.0 52.0 50.0 57.0 57.0 56.0 54.0 56.0 56.0 57.0 55.0 57.0 52.0 47.0 45.0 55.0 54.0 53.0 51.0 54.0 53.0 54.0 52.0 54.0 49.0 44.0 42.0 49.0 49.0 47.0 44.0 46.0 45.0 47.0 44.0 47.0 40.0 39.0 37.0 46.0 45.0 44.0 40.0 42.0 41.0 42.0 41.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 37.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 41.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 42.0 40.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 55.9 51.8 51.1 49.6 51.4 54.4 56.6 51.3 53.4 49.0 44.2 43.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.9 51.8 51.1 49.6 51.4 54.4 56.6 51.3 53.4 49.0 44.2 43.2 Evening 19 50.4 79.7 36.3 59.0 56.0 49.0 20 37.2 51.0 36.3 46.0 42.0 39.0 21 38.9 60.1 36.3 50.0 46.0 40.0 46.0 37.0 38.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 50.4 37.2 38.9 5.0 5.0 5.0 55.4 42.2 43.9 Night 22 40.3 63.2 36.3 51.0 47.0 40.0 38.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 40.3 10.0 50.3 23 35.5 48.5 36.3 42.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 35.5 10.0 45.5 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ea 43.2 56.6 52.5 69.2 84.2 36.3 41.1 Ave age: L1% 53.0 68.0 62.8 L2% 50.0 64.0 59.0 L5% 45.0 57.0 54.1 L8% 42.0 55.0 51.3 L25% 37.0 49.0 44.5 L50% 36.0 46.0 40.8 L90% 36.0 43.0 37.5 L95% 36.0 42.0 37.2 L99% 36.0 42.0 36.8 Evening Min Max Energy Average 37.2 50.4 46.1 51.0 36.3 79.7 36.3 Ave age: 46.0 42.0 59.0 56.0 51.7 48.0 39.0 49.0 42.7 37.0 46.0 40.3 36.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Night Min 35.2 45.0 Max 55.8 83.7 36.3 37.0 41.1 66.0 36.0 62.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 57.0 54.0 49.0 36.0 46.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 42.0 Energy Average 48.9 Ave age: 48.8 45.9 42.4 40.7 38.2 37.4 36.8 36.7 36.0 42.0 36.7 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 50.9 51.7 48.9 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 56.0 I \Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L9 G 115 URBAN 24 -Hour Noise Level Measurement Summary Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 Project: 1840 The Wave at Coral Mountain Location: Stone Creek Way. L10 - Located along 58th Ave slighty east of 58th Ave. and Meter: Piccolo I JN: 12642 Analyst: P. Mara Hourly L e. dBA Readings (unadjusted) 85.0 80.0 75.0 a 70.0 Q 65.0 60.0 - 55.0 `5 50.0 o 45.0 = 40.0 35.0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 56.0 52.1 43.9 47.7 57.9 57.7 57.1 67.2 62.0 64.1 71.9 77.2 80.3 74.2 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.3 37.3 64.0 57.0 57.0 59.0 71.0 68.0 68.0 64.0 57.0 54.0 55.0 68.0 67.0 67.0 63.0 56.0 46.0 51.0 64.0 64.0 64.0 59.0 56.0 42.0 48.0 61.0 62.0 62.0 56.0 55.0 36.0 38.0 53.0 53.0 54.0 55.0 47.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 46.0 47.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 56.0 52.1 43.9 47.7 57.9 57.7 57.1 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 66.0 62.1 53.9 57.7 67.9 67.7 Jai Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 61.0 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 87.0 84.2 79.7 91.2 88.2 83.8 84.0 86.5 82.8 89.8 79.8 80.7 43.7 39.7 39.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 38.1 38.4 40.3 36.1 36.1 36.1 76.0 74.0 72.0 73.0 76.0 72.0 73.0 74.0 71.0 74.0 69.0 72.0 73.0 71.0 70.0 71.0 72.0 70.0 71.0 72.0 69.0 72.0 68.0 70.0 69.0 67.0 67.0 68.0 69.0 66.0 68.0 68.0 66.0 67.0 64.0 67.0 66.0 65.0 65.0 66.0 67.0 64.0 66.0 66.0 65.0 64.0 62.0 65.0 58.0 58.0 59.0 59.0 60.0 58.0 60.0 60.0 59.0 57.0 55.0 56.0 54.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 54.0 53.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 48.0 46.0 45.0 44.0 45.0 46.0 46.0 45.0 48.0 45.0 40.0 38.0 47.0 44.0 43.0 41.0 43.0 43.0 44.0 43.0 46.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 45.0 41.0 41.0 38.0 38.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 61.0 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 61.0 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 Evening 19 20 21 62.1 44.7 47.4 88.0 66.7 74.1 36.1 36.3 36.3 70.0 58.0 58.0 68.0 66.0 51.0 45.0 54.0 47.0 64.0 43.0 45.0 57.0 41.0 43.0 49.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 62.1 44.7 47.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 67.1 49.7 52.4 Night 22 42.3 65.9 36.3 48.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 42.3 10.0 52.3 23 39.4 45.9 36.3 42.0 42.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 39.4 10.0 49.4 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ea 58.4 64.2 62.5 79.7 91.2 36.1 43.7 Ave age: L1% 69.0 76.0 73.0 L2% 68.0 73.0 70.8 L5% 64.0 69.0 67.2 L8% 62.0 67.0 65.1 L25% 55.0 60.0 58.3 L50% 51.0 55.0 53.3 L90% 38.0 48.0 44.7 L95% 36.0 47.0 42.6 L99% 36.0 45.0 39.5 Min Evening Max Energy Average 44.7 62.1 57.5 66.7 36.1 88.0 36.3 Ave age: 58.0 70.0 62.0 51.0 68.0 57.7 45.0 66.0 52.7 43.0 64.0 50.7 41.0 57.0 47.0 39.0 49.0 42.3 36.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Night Min 39.4 45.9 Max 57.9 80.3 Energy Average 54.2 36.1 37.3 Ave age: 42.0 71.0 59.3 42.0 68.0 57.4 41.0 64.0 54.4 41.0 62.0 52.4 36.0 56.0 47.2 36.0 55.0 42.8 36.0 41.0 37.0 36.0 39.0 36.7 36.0 39.0 36.3 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 60.3 61.9 54.2 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 63.3 I \Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L10 F 116 URBAN a N 1O N N- -_ �o _ O N V) O N Vo co N `a a m ei �o N N m a N p Lo ei t N m n a - _ iO n m a m 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Hour Beginning Timeframe Hour L eq L1% L2% L5% L8% L25% L50% L90% L95% L99% L eq Adj. Adj. L eQ Night 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 56.0 52.1 43.9 47.7 57.9 57.7 57.1 67.2 62.0 64.1 71.9 77.2 80.3 74.2 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 36.3 37.3 64.0 57.0 57.0 59.0 71.0 68.0 68.0 64.0 57.0 54.0 55.0 68.0 67.0 67.0 63.0 56.0 46.0 51.0 64.0 64.0 64.0 59.0 56.0 42.0 48.0 61.0 62.0 62.0 56.0 55.0 36.0 38.0 53.0 53.0 54.0 55.0 47.0 36.0 36.0 43.0 46.0 47.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 39.0 56.0 52.1 43.9 47.7 57.9 57.7 57.1 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 10.0 66.0 62.1 53.9 57.7 67.9 67.7 Jai Day 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 61.0 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 87.0 84.2 79.7 91.2 88.2 83.8 84.0 86.5 82.8 89.8 79.8 80.7 43.7 39.7 39.1 36.1 36.1 36.1 38.1 38.4 40.3 36.1 36.1 36.1 76.0 74.0 72.0 73.0 76.0 72.0 73.0 74.0 71.0 74.0 69.0 72.0 73.0 71.0 70.0 71.0 72.0 70.0 71.0 72.0 69.0 72.0 68.0 70.0 69.0 67.0 67.0 68.0 69.0 66.0 68.0 68.0 66.0 67.0 64.0 67.0 66.0 65.0 65.0 66.0 67.0 64.0 66.0 66.0 65.0 64.0 62.0 65.0 58.0 58.0 59.0 59.0 60.0 58.0 60.0 60.0 59.0 57.0 55.0 56.0 54.0 53.0 53.0 53.0 54.0 53.0 55.0 55.0 55.0 52.0 51.0 51.0 48.0 46.0 45.0 44.0 45.0 46.0 46.0 45.0 48.0 45.0 40.0 38.0 47.0 44.0 43.0 41.0 43.0 43.0 44.0 43.0 46.0 42.0 39.0 36.0 45.0 41.0 41.0 38.0 38.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 43.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 61.0 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 64.2 62.4 61.2 64.0 64.2 61.0 62.8 63.4 61.5 63.2 58.4 60.8 Evening 19 20 21 62.1 44.7 47.4 88.0 66.7 74.1 36.1 36.3 36.3 70.0 58.0 58.0 68.0 66.0 51.0 45.0 54.0 47.0 64.0 43.0 45.0 57.0 41.0 43.0 49.0 39.0 39.0 39.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 62.1 44.7 47.4 5.0 5.0 5.0 67.1 49.7 52.4 Night 22 42.3 65.9 36.3 48.0 43.0 41.0 41.0 41.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 I 42.3 10.0 52.3 23 39.4 45.9 36.3 42.0 42.0 41.0 41.0 39.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 39.4 10.0 49.4 Timeframe Day Hour Min Max Energy Average L ea 58.4 64.2 62.5 79.7 91.2 36.1 43.7 Ave age: L1% 69.0 76.0 73.0 L2% 68.0 73.0 70.8 L5% 64.0 69.0 67.2 L8% 62.0 67.0 65.1 L25% 55.0 60.0 58.3 L50% 51.0 55.0 53.3 L90% 38.0 48.0 44.7 L95% 36.0 47.0 42.6 L99% 36.0 45.0 39.5 Min Evening Max Energy Average 44.7 62.1 57.5 66.7 36.1 88.0 36.3 Ave age: 58.0 70.0 62.0 51.0 68.0 57.7 45.0 66.0 52.7 43.0 64.0 50.7 41.0 57.0 47.0 39.0 49.0 42.3 36.0 39.0 37.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 36.0 Night Min 39.4 45.9 Max 57.9 80.3 Energy Average 54.2 36.1 37.3 Ave age: 42.0 71.0 59.3 42.0 68.0 57.4 41.0 64.0 54.4 41.0 62.0 52.4 36.0 56.0 47.2 36.0 55.0 42.8 36.0 41.0 37.0 36.0 39.0 36.7 36.0 39.0 36.3 L eq (dBA) 24 -Hour Daytime Nighttime 60.3 61.9 54.2 24 -Hour CNEL (dBA) 63.3 I \Uxr fs\ucdata\UcJobsL12600-13000L12600\12642\Field Work\Measurements\12642 L10 F 116 URBAN Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis APPENDIX 7.1: OFF-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CONTOURS 12642-10 Noise Study 117 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 118 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 22,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,120 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centedine Dist. to Barrier: Centedine Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 0.44 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.80 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.75 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.5 68.9 67.1 Medium Trucks: 63.9 62.7 56.3 Heavy Trucks: 63.9 62.8 53.8 Leq Night 61.1 54.8 55.0 Ldn 69.7 63.2 63.4 CNEL 70.3 63.5 63.5 Vehicle Noise: 72.1 70.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 16,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,507 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centedine Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten I Autos: 71.78 -1.04 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -18.28 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -22.24 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 69.0 67.4 65.6 Medium Trucks: 62.4 61.2 54.8 Heavy Trucks: 62.4 61.3 52.3 Leq Night 59.6 53.3 53.5 Ldn 68.2 61.8 61.9 CNEL 68.8 62.0 62.0 67.7 62.8 71.3 71.8 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 69.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 79 85 65 dBA 169 182 60 dBA 365 393 55 dBA 786 846 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,181 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centedine Dist. to Barrier: Centedine Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 -2.10 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -19.34 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -23.29 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.9 66.4 64.6 Medium Trucks: 61.3 60.2 53.8 Heavy Trucks: 61.4 60.3 512 Leq Night 58.5 52.2 525 Ldn 67.2 60.7 60.8 CNEL 67.8 60.9 61.0 Vehicle Noise: 69.5 68.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.2 61.3 69.9 70.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 63 67 65 dBA 135 145 60 dBA 291 313 55 dBA 626 674 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,900 vehicles 9.30% 549 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centedine Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.02 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.25 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.21 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.2 62.6 60.8 Medium Trucks: 57.8 56.6 50.2 Heavy Trucks: 58.2 57.1 48.0 Leq Night 54.8 48.7 49.3 Ldn 63.4 57.1 57.6 CNEL 64.0 57.3 57.8 65.1 60.2 68.8 69.3 Vehicle Noise: 65.9 64.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 115 123 60 dBA 247 286 55 dBA 532 573 119 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.4 56.6 65.2 65.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 26 28 65 dBA 55 59 60 dBA 119 128 55 dBA 257 276 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,900 vehicles 9.30% 642 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Berner Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.34 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.57 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.53 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 64.9 63.3 61.5 Medium Trucks: 58.4 57.2 50.9 Heavy Trucks: 58.9 57.7 48.7 Leq Night 55.4 49.3 50.0 Ldn 64.1 57.8 58.3 CNEL 64.7 58.0 58.4 Vehicle Noise: 66.6 65.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 4,500 vehicles 9.30% 419 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten I Berm Atten I Autos: 70.20 -6.19 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.43 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.39 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 63.0 61.4 59.6 Medium Trucks: 56.6 55.4 49.0 Heavy Trucks: 57.0 55.9 46.9 Leq Night 53.6 47.5 48.1 Ldn 62.2 55.9 56.5 CNEL 62.8 56.2 56.6 62.1 57.3 65.8 66.3 Vehicle Noise: 64.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 28 31 65 dBA 61 66 60 d8A 132 142 55 dBA 285 306 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,400 vehicles 9.30% 874 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centedine Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.99 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.23 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.19 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 66.2 64.6 62.8 Medium Trucks: 59.8 58.6 52.2 Heavy Trucks: 60.2 59.1 50.1 Leq Night 56.8 50.7 51.3 Ldn 65.4 59.1 59.7 CNEL 66.0 59.4 59.8 Vehicle Noise: 67.9 66.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.4 58.6 67.2 63.3 60.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 55.4 64.0 64.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 23 65 dBA 46 50 60 d8A 99 107 55 dBA 214 230 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,700 vehicles 9.30% 623 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Ban-ier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.46 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.70 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.66 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 64.7 63.1 61.4 Medium Trucks: 58.3 57.1 50.8 Heavy Trucks: 58.7 57.6 48.6 Leq Night 55.3 49.2 49.8 Ldn 63.9 57.7 58.2 CNEL 64.5 57.9 58.3 67.6 Vehicle Noise: 66.4 65.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 38 65 dBA 75 81 60 dBA 55 dBA 162 350 175 376 120 61.9 57.2 65.7 66.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 28 30 65 dBA 60 65 60 dBA 55 dBA 130 279 139 300 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,800 vehicles 9.30% 260 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Ban-ier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -7.79 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -25.03 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -28.99 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 59.9 58.3 56.5 Medium Trucks: 53.7 52.5 46.1 Heavy Trucks: 54.5 53.4 44.4 Leq Night 50.5 44.6 45.6 Ldn 59.1 53.0 54.0 CNEL 59.7 53.3 54.1 Vehicle Noise: 61.7 60.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 9,600 vehicles 9.30% 893 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Dlsfance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.90 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.14 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.10 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 64.8 63.2 61.4 Medium Trucks: 58.3 57.1 50.8 Heavy Trucks: 58.8 57.6 48.6 Leq Night 55.4 49.2 49.9 Ldn 64.0 57.7 58.2 CNEL 64.6 57.9 58.3 57.2 52.5 61.0 61.5 Vehicle Noise: 66.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA I 65 dBA 13 28 14 30 60 dBA 60 64 55 dBA 129 138 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,500 vehicles 9.30% 698 vehicles 50 mph 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.97 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.21 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.17 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 63.7 62.1 60.3 Medium Trucks: 57.3 56.1 49.7 Heavy Trucks: 57.7 56.6 47.5 Leq Night 54.3 48.2 48.8 Ldn 62.9 56.6 57.1 CNEL 63.5 56.9 57.3 Vehicle Noise: 65.4 63.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.0 62.0 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.2 65.7 66.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 33 36 65 dBA 72 77 60 48,4 154 186 55 dBA 333 358 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,100 vehicles 9.30% 474 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.65 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.89 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.84 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 63.5 62.0 602 Medium Trucks: 57.1 55.9 49.6 Heavy Trucks: 57.5 56.4 47.4 Leq Night 54.1 48.0 48.6 Ldn 62.8 56.5 57.0 CNEL 63.4 56.7 57.1 60.9 56.1 64.7 65.1 Vehicle Noise: 65.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 28 30 65 dBA 61 65 60 d&4 131 141 55 d8A 282 303 121 63.8 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.8 56.0 64.5 65.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 23 25 65 dBA 50 54 60 dBA 55 dBA 108 233 116 250 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,900 vehicles 9.30% 363 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Ban-ier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.81 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.05 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.01 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.4 60.8 59.0 Medium Trucks: 56.0 54.8 48.4 Heavy Trucks: 56.4 55.3 462 Leq Night 53.0 46.9 47.5 Ldn 61.6 55.3 55.8 CNEL 62.2 55.5 56.0 Vehicle Noise: 64.1 62.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 3,400 vehicles 9.30% 316 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -7.41 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.65 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.60 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 61.8 60.2 58.4 Medium Trucks: 55.4 Heavy Trucks: 55.8 54.2 47.8 54.7 45.6 Leq Night 524 46.3 46.9 Ldn 61.0 54.7 55.2 CNEL 61.6 55.0 55.4 59.6 54.8 63.4 63.8 Vehicle Noise: 63.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 dBA 19 42 21 45 60 dBA 90 97 55 dBA 195 209 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,700 vehicles 9.30% 251 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -8.41 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -25.65 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -29.60 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 60.8 59.2 57.4 Medium Trucks: 54.4 53.2 46.8 Heavy Trucks: 54.8 53.7 44.6 Leq Night 51.4 45.3 45.9 Ldn 60.0 53.7 54.2 CNEL 60.6 54.0 54.4 Vehicle Noise: 62.5 62.0 59.0 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 54.2 62.8 63.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 18 19 65 dBA 38 41 60 dBA 82 89 55 dBA 178 191 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,200 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.62 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.86 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.81 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.6 66.0 642 Medium Trucks: 61.2 60.0 53.6 Heavy Trucks: 61.6 60.5 51.4 Leq Night 58.2 52.1 527 Ldn 66.8 60.5 61.0 CNEL 67.4 60.7 61.2 61.0 58.0 53.2 61.8 62.2 Vehicle Noise: 69.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: 16 70 dBA 15 Wednesday, March 25, 2020 65 dBA 33 35 60 dBA 55 dBA 71 152 76 164 122 67.8 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.8 60.0 68.6 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA L 60 dBA 93 201 100 216 55 dBA 432 464 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,042 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.23 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.47 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.43 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.0 65.4 63.6 Medium Trucks: 60.5 59.3 53.0 Heavy Trucks: 61.0 59.9 50.8 Leq Night 57.5 51.4 52.1 Ldn 66.2 59.9 60.4 CNEL 66.8 60.1 60.5 Vehicle Noise: 68.7 67.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 9,300 vehicles 9.30% 865 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -3.04 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.28 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.23 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.6 63.0 61.3 Medium Trucks: 58.2 57.0 50.6 Heavy Trucks: 58.6 57.5 48.5 Leq Night 55.2 49.1 497 Ldn 63.8 57.6 58.1 CNEL 64.4 57.8 58.2 64.2 59.4 67.9 68.4 Vehicle Noise: 66.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 39 42 65 dBA 85 91 60 dBA 183 196 55 dBA 393 423 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,900 vehicles 9.30% 735 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centedine Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bonn Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.75 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.99 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.94 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.4 63.9 62.1 Medium Trucks: 59.0 57.8 51.5 Heavy Trucks: 59.4 58.3 49.3 Leq Night 56.0 49.9 50.5 Ldn 64.7 58.4 58.9 CNEL 65.3 58.6 59.0 Vehicle Noise: 67.1 65.7 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.9 61.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.1 65.6 66.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 33 35 65 dBA 70 75 60 48,4 151 182 55 dBA 326 350 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,600 vehicles 9.30% 800 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Was, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.38 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.62 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.57 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.8 64.2 62.5 Medium Trucks: 59.4 58.2 51.8 Heavy Trucks: 59.8 58.7 497 Leq Night 56.4 50.3 50.9 Ldn 65.0 58.8 59.3 CNEL 65.6 59.0 59.4 62.7 57.9 66.4 66.9 Vehicle Noise: 67.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 31 33 65 dBA 67 72 60 dBA 145 155 55 dBA 312 335 123 66.1 63.0 58.2 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.8 67.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 33 35 65 dBA 71 76 60 dBA 55 dBA 153 330 165 354 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,300 vehicles 9.30% 493 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.48 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.72 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.68 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.7 62.1 60.4 Medium Trucks: 57.3 56.1 49.7 Heavy Trucks: 57.7 56.6 47.6 Leq Night 54.3 482 48.8 Ldn 62.9 56.6 57.2 CNEL 63.5 56.9 57.3 Vehicle Noise: 65.4 64.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 2,000 vehicles 9.30% 186 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -9.71 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -26.95 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -30.91 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 59.5 57.9 56.1 Medium Trucks: 53.1 51.9 45.5 Heavy Trucks: 53.5 52.4 43.3 Leq Night 50.1 44.0 44.6 Ldn 58.7 52.4 52.9 CNEL 59.3 52.6 53.1 60.9 56.1 64.7 65.2 Vehicle Noise: 61.2 59.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 24 26 65 dBA 51 55 60 dBA 111 119 55 dBA 239 257 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 1,600 vehicles 9.30% 149 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -10.22 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -27.46 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -31.42 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 57.5 55.9 54.1 Medium Trucks: 51.2 50.1 43.7 Heavy Trucks: 52.1 51.0 41.9 Leq Night Ldn 48.1 42.1 43.2 56.7 50.6 51.6 CNEL 57.3 50.8 51.7 Vehicle Noise: 59.3 57.9 54.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 50.1 58.6 59.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 9 10 65 dBA 19 20 60 dBA 41 44 55 dBA 89 95 124 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 56.7 51.9 60.5 60.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 12 13 65 dBA 27 29 60 dBA 58 62 55 dBA 125 134 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,300 vehicles 9.30% 214 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -8.65 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -25.89 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -29.84 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 59.0 57.5 557 Medium Trucks: 52.8 51.6 45.3 Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 53.7 52.6 43.5 Leq Night Ldn 49.6 43.7 44.8 58.3 52.2 53.1 CNEL 58.9 52.4 53.3 60.9 59.5 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 56.3 51.6 60.2 60.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 11 12 65 dBA 24 26 60 dBA 55 dBA 52 113 56 121 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 1,800 vehicles 9.30% 167 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 59.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 59.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -10.17 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -27.41 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -31.37 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 57.9 56.4 54.6 Medium Trucks: 51.5 50.3 44.0 Heavy Trucks: 51.9 50.8 41.8 Leq Night Ldn 48.5 42.4 43.0 57.2 50.9 51.4 CNEL 57.8 51.1 51.5 Vehicle Noise: 59.6 58.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 1,400 vehicles 9.30% 130 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 59.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 59.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -11.26 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -28.50 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -32.46 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 56.9 55.3 53.5 Medium Trucks: 50.4 49.2 42.9 Heavy Trucks: 50.8 49.7 40.7 Leq Night 47.4 41.3 42.0 Ldn 56.1 49.8 50.3 CNEL 56.7 50.0 50.4 55.2 50.4 58.9 59.4 Vehicle Noise: 58.6 57.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 dBA 11 23 12 25 60 dBA 50 54 55 dBA 108 116 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 100 vehicles 9.30% 9 vehicles 40 mph 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I SIte Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Banier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 40.0 feet 40.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -21.75 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -38.99 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -42.95 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 45.1 43.5 41.8 Medium Trucks: 39.1 37.9 31.6 Heavy Trucks: 40.5 39.4 30.3 Leq Night 35.7 30.0 31.6 Ldn 44.4 38.5 39.9 CNEL 45.0 38.7 40.0 Vehicle Noise: 47.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 54.1 49.3 57.8 58.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 dBA 9 20 10 21 60 dBA 42 45 55 dBA 91 98 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,200 vehicles 9.30% 298 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -7.21 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -24.45 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -28.41 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 60.5 58.9 57.1 Medium Trucks: 54.3 53.1 46.7 Heavy Trucks: 55.1 54.0 45.0 Leq Night Ldn 51.1 45.2 46.2 59.7 53.6 54.6 CNEL 60.3 53.9 54.7 45.7 42.5 37.9 46.4 46.9 Vehicle Noise: 62.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 1 1 65 dBA 2 2 60 dBA 55 dBA 5 11 5 12 125 60.9 57.7 53.1 61.6 62.1 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 14 15 65 dBA 30 33 60 dBA 65 70 55 dBA 141 151 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: Existing (2019) Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 1,200 vehicles 9.30% 112 vehicles 50 mph 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Ban-ier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -11.93 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -29.17 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -33.13 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 55.8 54.2 52.5 Medium Trucks: 49.4 48.2 41.9 Heavy Trucks: 49.8 48.7 39.7 Leq Night 46.4 40.3 40.9 Ldn 55.0 48.8 49.3 CNEL 55.7 49.0 49.4 Vehicle Noise: 57.5 56.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 23,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,167 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observes 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 71.78 0.54 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.70 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.66 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.6 69.0 672 Medium Trucks: 64.0 62.8 56.4 Heavy Trucks: 64.0 62.9 53.9 Leq Night 61.2 54.9 55.1 Ldn 69.8 63.3 63.5 CNEL 70.4 63.6 63.6 53.0 48.3 56.8 57.3 Vehicle Noise: 72.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 8 9 65 dBA 18 20 60 dBA 39 42 55 dBA 85 91 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 16,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,572 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 -0.86 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -18.10 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -22.05 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 69.2 67.6 65.8 Medium Trucks: 62.6 61.4 55.0 Heavy Trucks: 62.6 61.5 52.5 Leq Night 59.8 53.5 53.7 Ldn 68.4 61.9 62.1 CNEL 69.0 62.2 62.2 Vehicle Noise: 70.8 69.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 70.7 67.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.9 71.4 71.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 80 86 65 dBA 172 185 60 dBA 370 398 55 dBA 798 858 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,265 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 -1.80 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -19.04 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -23.00 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.2 66.7 64.9 Medium Trucks: 61.6 60.4 54.1 Heavy Trucks: 61.7 60.6 51.5 Leq Night 58.8 52.5 528 Ldn 67.5 61.0 61.1 CNEL 68.1 61.2 61.3 66.4 61.5 70.0 70.5 Vehicle Noise: 69.8 68.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 64 69 65 dBA 139 149 60 dBA 299 322 55 dBA 644 693 126 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.4 60.5 69.1 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 56 60 65 dBA 120 129 60 dBA 259 278 55 dBA 557 599 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,400 vehicles 9.30% 595 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrer Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.66 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.90 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.86 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.5 62.9 61.2 Medium Trucks: 58.1 56.9 50.6 Heavy Trucks: 58.5 57.4 48.4 Leq Night 55.1 49.0 49.6 Ldn 63.7 57.5 58.0 CNEL 64.3 57.7 58.1 Vehicle Noise: 66.2 64.8 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 7,700 vehicles 9.30% 716 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -3.86 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.10 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.05 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.3 63.7 62.0 Medium Trucks: 58.9 57.7 51.4 Heavy Trucks: 59.3 58.2 49.2 Leq Night 55.9 49.8 50.4 Ldn 64.5 58.3 58.8 CNEL 65.1 58.5 58.9 61.7 57.0 65.5 66.0 Vehicle Noise: 67.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 27 29 65 dBA 58 63 60 dBA 126 135 55 dBA 271 291 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,800 vehicles 9.30% 539 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.09 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.33 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.28 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.1 62.5 607 Medium Trucks: 57.7 56.5 50.1 Heavy Trucks: 58.1 57.0 48.0 Leq Night 54.7 48.6 49.2 Lan 63.3 57.0 57.6 CNEL 63.9 57.3 57.7 Vehicle Noise: 65.8 65.6 62.5 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.8 66.3 66.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 31 33 65 dBA 66 71 60 dBA 142 153 55 dBA 306 329 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,107 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrer. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.97 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.21 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.16 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.2 65.6 63.9 Medium Trucks: 60.8 59.6 53.2 Heavy Trucks: 61.2 60.1 51.1 Leq Night 57.8 51.7 52.3 Ldn 66.4 60.2 60.7 CNEL 67.0 60.4 60.8 64.4 61.3 56.5 65.1 65.5 Vehicle Noise: 68.9 67.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 25 27 65 dBA 55 59 60 dBA 55 dBA 118 254 127 273 127 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.4 59.7 68.2 68.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 88 95 60 dBA 55 dBA 190 410 204 440 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,700 vehicles 9.30% 902 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.86 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.09 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.05 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.3 64.7 63.0 Medium Trucks: 59.9 58.7 52.4 Heavy Trucks: 60.3 59.2 502 Leq Night 56.9 50.8 51.4 Ldn 65.5 59.3 59.8 CNEL 66.2 59.5 59.9 Vehicle Noise: 68.0 66.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 3,900 vehicles 9.30% 363 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten I Autos: 68.46 -6.36 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -23.59 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -27.55 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 61.3 59.8 58.0 Medium Trucks: 55.1 53.9 47.6 Heavy Trucks: 56.0 54.9 45.8 Leq Night 51.9 46.0 47.1 Ldn 60.6 54.5 55.4 CNEL 61.2 54.7 55.6 63.5 58.8 67.3 67.8 Vehicle Noise: 63.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 36 38 65 dBA 77 83 60 dBA 166 178 55 dBA 357 384 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 939 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bonn Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.68 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.92 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.87 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.0 63.4 61.6 Medium Trucks: 58.6 57.4 51.0 Heavy Trucks: 59.0 57.9 48.8 Leq Night 55.6 49.5 50.1 Ldn 64.2 57.9 58.4 CNEL 64.8 58.1 58.6 Vehicle Noise: 66.7 65.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.8 58.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 53.9 62.5 62.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 16 17 65 dBA 35 37 60 dBA 75 80 55 dBA 161 172 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,200 vehicles 9.30% 763 vehicles 50 mph 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.59 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.82 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.78 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.1 62.5 607 Medium Trucks: 57.6 56.5 50.1 Heavy Trucks: 58.1 57.0 47.9 Leq Night 54.7 48.5 492 Ldn 63.3 57.0 57.5 CNEL 63.9 57.2 57.7 62.2 57.4 66.0 66.4 Vehicle Noise: 65.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 34 37 65 dBA 74 80 60 dBA 55 dBA 160 344 172 370 128 64.3 61.3 56.5 65.1 65.5 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 30 32 65 dBA 65 69 60 dBA 55 dBA 139 300 149 322 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,900 vehicles 9.30% 549 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Ban-ier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Dlsfance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.02 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.25 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.21 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.2 62.6 60.8 Medium Trucks: 57.8 56.6 50.2 Heavy Trucks: 58.2 57.1 48.0 Leq Night 548 48.7 49.3 Ldn 63.4 57.1 57.6 CNEL 64.0 57.3 57.8 Vehicle Noise: 65.9 64.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 4,600 vehicles 9.30% 428 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.10 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.33 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.29 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.1 61.5 597 Medium Trucks: 56.7 55.5 49.1 Heavy Trucks: 57.1 56.0 46.9 Leq Night 53.7 47.6 48.2 Ldn 62.3 56.0 56.6 CNEL 62.9 56.3 56.7 61.4 56.6 65.2 65.6 Vehicle Noise: 64.8 63.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 26 28 65 dBA 55 59 60 dBA 119 128 55 dBA 257 276 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,400 vehicles 9.30% 409 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bonn Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.29 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.53 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.48 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.9 61.3 59.5 Medium Trucks: 56.5 55.3 48.9 Heavy Trucks: 56.9 55.8 46.8 Leq Night 53.5 47.4 48.0 Ldn 62.1 55.8 56.4 CNEL 62.7 56.1 56.5 Vehicle Noise: 64.6 63.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.1 55.3 63.9 64.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 23 65 dBA 45 49 60 dBA 55 dBA 98 211 105 227 129 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.3 55.5 64.1 64.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 22 23 65 dBA 47 50 60 dBA 101 108 55 dBA 217 234 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,900 vehicles 9.30% 270 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -8.10 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -25.34 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -29.29 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 61.1 59.5 577 Medium Trucks: 54.7 53.5 47.1 Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 55.1 54.0 44.9 Leq Night 51.7 45.6 46.2 Ldn 60.3 54.0 54.6 CNEL 60.9 54.3 54.7 62.8 61.3 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.3 53.5 62.1 62.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 16 17 65 dBA 34 37 60 dBA 74 80 55 dBA 160 172 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,246 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Berner Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.45 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.69 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.65 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.7 66.1 64.4 Medium Trucks: 61.3 60.1 53.8 Heavy Trucks: 61.7 60.6 51.6 Leq Night 58.3 52.2 52.8 Ldn 67.0 60.7 61.2 CNEL 67.6 60.9 61.3 Vehicle Noise: 69.4 68.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,060 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.15 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.39 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.35 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.0 65.4 637 Medium Trucks: 60.6 59.4 53.1 Heavy Trucks: 61.0 59.9 50.9 Leq Night 57.6 51.5 52.1 Ldn 66.2 60.0 60.5 CNEL 66.9 60.2 60.6 64.9 60.2 68.7 69.2 Vehicle Noise: 68.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 44 48 65 dBA 96 103 60 dBA 206 221 55 dBA 443 476 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,500 vehicles 9.30% 884 vehicles 50 mph 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.95 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.18 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.14 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.7 63.1 61.4 Medium Trucks: 58.3 57.1 50.7 Heavy Trucks: 58.7 57.6 48.6 Leq Night 55.3 49.2 49.8 Ldn 63.9 57.6 58.2 CNEL 64.5 57.9 58.3 Vehicle Noise: 66.4 65.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.3 64.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.5 68.0 68.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 40 43 65 dBA 86 92 60 dBA 185 199 55 dBA 398 428 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,300 vehicles 9.30% 772 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation.- Road levation:Road Elevation.- Road levation:Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.53 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.77 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.73 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.7 64.1 62.3 Medium Trucks: 59.2 58.0 51.7 Heavy Trucks: 59.7 58.5 49.5 Leq Night 56.2 50.1 50.8 Ldn 64.9 58.6 59.1 CNEL 65.5 58.8 59.2 61.9 57.1 65.7 66.2 Vehicle Noise: 67.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 33 36 65 dBA 71 76 60 dBA 55 dBA 153 330 165 355 130 65.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.9 58.1 66.6 67.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 32 35 65 dBA 69 75 60 48,4 150 181 55 dBA 322 346 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,500 vehicles 9.30% 884 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.95 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.18 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.14 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.2 64.7 62.9 Medium Trucks: 59.8 58.6 52.3 Heavy Trucks: 60.2 59.1 50.1 Leq Night 56.8 50.7 51.3 Ldn 65.5 59.2 59.7 CNEL 66.1 59.4 59.8 Vehicle Noise: 67.9 66.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 5,600 vehicles 9.30% 521 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation.- Road levation:Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.24 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.48 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.44 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.9 62.4 60.6 Medium Trucks: 57.5 Heavy Trucks: 57.9 56.3 50.0 56.8 47.8 Leq Night 54.5 48.4 49.1 Ldn 63.2 56.9 57.4 CNEL 63.8 57.1 57.5 63.5 58.7 67.2 67.7 Vehicle Noise: 65.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 38 65 dBA 76 82 60 d8A 164 176 55 dBA 353 379 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,300 vehicles 9.30% 214 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -9.11 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -26.34 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -30.30 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 60.1 58.5 56.7 Medium Trucks: 53.7 52.5 46.1 Heavy Trucks: 54.1 53.0 43.9 Leq Night Ldn 507 44.6 45.2 59.3 53.0 53.5 CNEL 59.9 53.3 53.7 Vehicle Noise: 61.8 64.2 61.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 56.4 64.9 65.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 25 27 65 dBA 53 57 60 48,4 115 124 55 dBA 248 266 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,200 vehicles 9.30% 205 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -8.84 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -26.08 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -30.04 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 58.9 57.3 55.5 Medium Trucks: 52.6 51.4 45.1 Heavy Trucks: 53.5 52.4 43.3 Leq Night Ldn 49.4 43.5 44.6 58.1 52.0 52.9 CNEL 58.7 52.2 53.1 60.3 57.3 52.5 61.1 61.5 Vehicle Noise: 60.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 14 15 65 484 30 32 60 d&4 64 68 55 dBA 137 147 131 59.3 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 56.1 51.4 60.0 60.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 11 12 65 484 24 25 60 d8A 55 dBA 51 110 55 118 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,100 vehicles 9.30% 381 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -6.14 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -23.38 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -27.33 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 61.6 60.0 582 Medium Trucks: 55.3 54.1 47.8 Heavy Trucks: 56.2 55.1 46.0 Leq Night 52.2 462 47.3 Ldn 60.8 54.7 55.6 CNEL I 61.4 54.9 55.8 Vehicle Noise: 63.4 62.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.8 54.1 62.7 63.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 1 65 dBA 17 36 18 38 60 dBA 77 83 55 dBA 166 178 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,000 vehicles 9.30% 186 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 59.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 59.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -9.71 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -26.95 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -30.91 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 58.4 56.8 55.1 Medium Trucks: 52.0 50.8 44.4 Heavy Trucks: 52.4 51.3 42.3 Leq Night 49.0 429 43.5 Ldn 57.6 51.3 51.9 CNEL 58.2 51.6 52.0 Vehicle Noise: 60.1 58.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 2,700 vehicles 9.30% 251 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 59.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 59.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -8.41 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -25.65 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -29.60 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 59.7 58.1 56.4 Medium Trucks: 53.3 52.1 45.7 Heavy Trucks: 53.7 52.6 43.6 Leq Night 1 Ldn 50.3 44.2 44.8 58.9 52.6 53.2 CNEL 59.5 52.9 53.3 Vehicle Noise: 61.4 60.0 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 56.9 52.1 60.7 61.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 14 15 65 dBA 30 33 60 dBA 66 70 55 dBA 141 152 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 1,300 vehicles 9.30% 121 vehicles 40 mph 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 40.0 feet 40.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks: 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -10.62 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -27.85 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -31.81 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 56.3 54.7 52.9 Medium Trucks: 50.3 49.1 42.7 Heavy Trucks: 51.6 50.5 41.5 Leq Night 46.9 41.2 427 Ldn 55.5 49.6 51.1 CNEL 56.1 49.9 51.2 55.6 50.8 59.4 59.9 Vehicle Noise: 58.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA I 12 12 65 dBA 25 27 60 dBA 54 58 55 dBA 116 124 132 56.9 53.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 49.1 57.6 58.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 6 65 dBA 13 14 60 dBA 28 30 55 dBA 59 64 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,500 vehicles 9.30% 419 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -5.73 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.97 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.93 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.0 60.4 58.6 Medium Trucks: 55.7 54.5 48.2 Heavy Trucks: 56.6 55.5 46.4 Leq Night 52.6 46.6 477 Ldn 61.2 55.1 56.0 CNEL 61.8 55.3 56.2 Vehicle Noise: 63.8 62.4 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E+P Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 1,900 vehicles 9.30% 177 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -9.94 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -27.17 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -31.13 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 57.8 56.2 54.5 Medium Trucks: 51.4 50.2 43.8 Heavy Trucks: 51.8 50.7 41.7 Leq Night Ldn 48.4 42.3 42.9 57.0 50.8 51.3 CNEL 57.7 51.0 51.4 59.2 54.5 63.1 63.5 Vehicle Noise: 59.5 58.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 dBA 18 38 19 41 60 dBA 82 88 55 dBA 177 189 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 28,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,623 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 1.36 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -15.87 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -19.83 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 71.4 69.8 68.1 Medium Trucks: 64.8 63.6 57.3 Heavy Trucks: 64.8 63.7 547 Leq Night 62.0 55.7 55.9 Ldn 70.6 64.2 64.3 CNEL 71.2 64.4 64.4 Vehicle Noise: 73.0 71.5 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 55.0 50.3 58.8 59.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 11 12 65 dBA 25 27 60 dBA 53 57 55 dBA 115 123 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 19,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,804 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 -0.26 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -17.50 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -21.45 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 69.8 68.2 66.4 Medium Trucks: 63.2 62.0 55.6 Heavy Trucks: 63.2 62.1 53.1 Leq Night 60.4 54.1 54.3 Ldn CNEL 69.0 62.5 62.7 69.6 62.8 62.8 68.6 63.7 72.3 72.7 Vehicle Noise: 71.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 91 97 65 dBA 195 210 60 dBA 55 dBA 421 906 452 975 133 69.9 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.0 62.1 70.6 71.1 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 48A 55 dBA Ldn: 71 152 328 706 CNEL: 76 164 353 760 Wednesday, March 25, 2020 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 16,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,516 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 -1.02 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -18.25 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -22.21 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 69.0 67.4 65.7 Medium Trucks: 62.4 61.2 54.9 Heavy Trucks: 62.5 61.4 52.3 Leq Night 59.6 53.3 53.6 Ldn 68.2 61.8 61.9 CNEL 68.8 62.0 62.1 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 69.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 9,000 vehicles 9.30% 837 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrer:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten I Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -3.18 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.42 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.38 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 66.0 64.4 62.7 Medium Trucks: 59.6 58.4 52.0 Heavy Trucks: 60.0 58.9 49.9 Leq Night 56.6 50.5 51.1 Ldn 65.2 58.9 59.5 CNEL 65.8 59.2 59.6 66.2 61.3 69.9 70.4 Vehicle Noise: 67.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 63 68 65 dBA 135 146 60 dBA 292 314 55 dBA 629 676 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,051 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.19 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.43 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.39 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 67.0 65.4 63.6 Medium Trucks: 60.6 59.4 53.0 Heavy Trucks: 61.0 59.9 50.9 Leq Night 57.6 51.5 52.1 Ldn 66.2 59.9 60.5 CNEL 66.8 60.2 60.6 Vehicle Noise: 68.7 67.3 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.3 63.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.4 67.0 67.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 34 37 65 dBA 73 79 60 dBA 158 170 55 dBA 340 365 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,500 vehicles 9.30% 698 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.97 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.21 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.17 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 65.2 63.6 61.9 Medium Trucks: 58.8 57.6 51.2 Heavy Trucks: 59.2 58.1 49.1 Leq Night 55.8 49.7 50.3 Ldn 64.4 58.2 58.7 CNEL 65.0 58.4 58.8 64.2 59.4 68.0 68.4 Vehicle Noise: 66.9 65.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 40 43 65 dBA 85 92 60 dBA 55 dBA 184 396 197 425 134 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.4 57.6 66.2 66.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 30 32 65 dBA 65 70 60 dBA I 55 dBA 140 301 150 324 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 15,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,414 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centedine Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.91 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.14 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.10 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.3 66.7 64.9 Medium Trucks: 61.9 60.7 54.3 Heavy Trucks: 62.3 61.2 52.1 Leq Night 58.9 52.8 53.4 Ldn 67.5 61.2 61.7 CNEL 68.1 61.5 61.9 Vehicle Noise: 70.0 68.5 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 995 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -2.43 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.67 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.62 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.8 65.2 63.4 Medium Trucks: 60.3 59.1 52.8 Heavy Trucks: 60.8 59.7 50.6 Leq Night 57.4 51.2 51.9 Ldn 66.0 59.7 60.2 CNEL 66.6 59.9 60.3 65.5 60.7 69.3 69.7 Vehicle Noise: 68.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 48 52 65 dBA 104 112 60 dBA 224 240 55 dBA 482 518 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,100 vehicles 9.30% 474 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -5.19 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.43 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.38 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.5 60.9 592 Medium Trucks: 56.3 55.1 48.7 Heavy Trucks: 57.1 56.0 47.0 Leq Night 53.1 472 48.2 Ldn 61.7 55.6 56.6 CNEL 62.3 55.9 56.7 Vehicle Noise: 64.3 62.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.8 55.1 63.6 64.1 70 dBA 65 dBA Ldn: 19 41 CNEL: 21 44 Wednesday, March 25, 2020 60 dBA 89 96 55 dBA 192 206 135 67.0 64.0 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.2 67.7 68.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 38 41 65 dBA 82 88 60 dBA 177 190 55 dBA 382 410 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 949 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation.- Road levation:Road Elevation.- Road levation:Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.64 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.88 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.83 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.0 63.4 61.7 Medium Trucks: 58.6 57.4 51.0 Heavy Trucks: 59.0 57.9 48.9 Leq Night 55.6 49.5 50.1 Ldn 64.2 58.0 58.5 CNEL 64.8 58.2 58.6 Vehicle Noise: 66.7 65.3 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.2 57.5 66.0 66.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 37 65 dBA 75 80 60 dBA 161 173 55 dBA 347 372 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,700 vehicles 9.30% 902 vehicles 50 mph 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.86 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.09 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.05 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 64.8 63.2 61.5 Medium Trucks: 58.4 57.2 50.8 Heavy Trucks: 58.8 57.7 48.7 Leq Night 55.4 49.3 49.9 Ldn 64.0 57.7 58.3 CNEL 64.6 58.0 58.4 Vehicle Noise: 66.5 65.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 8,900 vehicles 9.30% 828 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten I Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.23 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.47 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.42 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 66.0 64.4 62.6 Medium Trucks: 59.5 58.3 52.0 Heavy Trucks: 60.0 58.9 49.8 Leq Night 56.6 50.4 51.1 Ldn 65.2 58.9 59.4 CNEL 65.8 59.1 59.5 62.0 57.2 65.8 66.3 Vehicle Noise: 67.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 34 36 65 dBA 72 78 60 dBA 156 167 55 dBA 335 360 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,600 vehicles 9.30% 707 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.92 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.15 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.11 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 65.3 63.7 61.9 Medium Trucks: 58.9 57.7 51.3 Heavy Trucks: 59.3 58.2 49.1 Leq Night 55.9 49.8 50.4 Ldn 64.5 58.2 58.7 CNEL 65.1 58.4 58.9 Vehicle Noise: 67.0 65.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.2 63.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.4 66.9 67.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 34 36 65 dBA 73 78 60 dBA 157 188 55 dBA 338 363 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,100 vehicles 9.30% 567 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.87 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.11 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.06 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 64.3 62.7 61.0 Medium Trucks: 57.9 56.7 50.3 Heavy Trucks: 58.3 57.2 48.2 Leq Night 54.9 48.8 49.4 Ldn 63.5 57.3 57.8 CNEL I 64.1 57.5 57.9 62.5 57.7 66.3 66.7 Vehicle Noise: 66.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 30 33 65 dBA 65 70 60 dBA 1 55 dBA 141 304 152 326 136 64.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.5 56.8 65.3 65.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 26 28 65 dBA 57 61 60 dBA 55 dBA 122 262 131 282 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,200 vehicles 9.30% 484 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.56 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.80 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.76 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.6 62.0 60.3 Medium Trucks: 57.2 56.0 49.7 Heavy Trucks: 57.6 56.5 47.5 Leq Night 54.2 48.1 48.7 Ldn 62.8 56.6 57.1 CNEL 63.4 56.8 57.2 Vehicle Noise: 65.3 63.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,209 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Was, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -1.58 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.82 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.78 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.6 66.0 64.3 Medium Trucks: 61.2 60.0 53.6 Heavy Trucks: 61.6 60.5 51.5 Leq Night 58.2 52.1 52.7 Ldn 66.8 60.5 61.1 CNEL 67.4 60.8 61.2 60.8 56.1 64.6 65.1 Vehicle Noise: 69.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 24 25 65 dBA 51 55 60 dBA 110 118 55 dBA 236 253 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,358 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer. Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.08 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.32 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.27 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.1 66.5 64.8 Medium Trucks: 61.7 60.5 54.1 Heavy Trucks: 62.1 61.0 52.0 Leq Night 58.7 52.6 53.2 Ldn 67.3 61.1 61.6 CNEL 67.9 61.3 61.7 Vehicle Noise: 69.8 67.9 64.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.0 68.6 69.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 47 65 dBA 94 101 60 dBA 202 217 55 dBA 435 467 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,107 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.97 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.21 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.16 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.7 64.1 62.3 Medium Trucks: 59.3 58.1 51.7 Heavy Trucks: 59.7 58.6 49.5 Leq Night 56.3 50.2 50.8 Ldn 64.9 58.6 59.1 CNEL 65.5 58.9 59.3 68.4 65.3 60.5 69.1 69.6 Vehicle Noise: 67.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 47 50 65 dBA 101 109 60 dBA 55 dBA 218 470 234 504 137 66.0 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.9 58.1 66.7 67.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 38 41 65 dBA 83 89 60 dBA 178 192 55 dBA 384 413 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,042 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.23 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.47 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.43 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.0 65.4 63.6 Medium Trucks: 60.5 59.3 53.0 Heavy Trucks: 61.0 59.9 50.8 Leq Night 57.5 51.4 52.1 Ldn 66.2 59.9 60.4 CNEL 66.8 60.1 60.5 Vehicle Noise: 68.7 67.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,190 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.65 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.89 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.85 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.5 66.0 642 Medium Trucks: 61.1 59.9 53.6 Heavy Trucks: 61.5 60.4 51.4 Leq Night 58.1 52.0 526 Ldn 66.8 60.5 61.0 CNEL 67.4 60.7 61.1 64.2 59.4 67.9 68.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 39 42 65 dBA 85 91 60 dBA 183 196 55 dBA 393 423 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,700 vehicles 9.30% 716 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.86 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.10 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.05 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.3 63.7 62.0 Medium Trucks: 58.9 57.7 51.4 Heavy Trucks: 59.3 58.2 492 Leq Night 55.9 49.8 50.4 Ldn 64.5 58.3 58.8 CNEL 65.1 58.5 58.9 Vehicle Noise: 67.0 65.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.8 64.7 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.0 68.5 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA 93 100 60 dBA 200 214 55 dBA 430 462 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,000 vehicles 9.30% 372 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.70 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.94 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.90 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.5 60.9 59.1 Medium Trucks: 56.1 54.9 48.5 Heavy Trucks: 56.5 55.4 46.3 Leq Night 53.1 47.0 47.6 Ldn 61.7 55.4 55.9 CNEL 62.3 55.7 56.1 62.5 57.8 66.3 66.8 Vehicle Noise: 64.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 31 33 65 dBA 66 71 60 dBA 55 dBA 142 306 153 329 138 62.7 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.7 54.9 63.5 63.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 20 21 65 dBA 43 46 60 dBA 55 dBA 92 198 99 213 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,800 vehicles 9.30% 260 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BamerAtten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -7.79 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -25.03 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -28.99 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 59.9 58.3 56.5 Medium Trucks: 53.7 52.5 46.1 Heavy Trucks: 54.5 53.4 44.4 Leq Night 50.5 44.6 45.6 Ldn 59.1 53.0 54.0 CNEL 59.7 53.3 54.1 Vehicle Noise: 61.7 60.3 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 3,800 vehicles 9.30% 353 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten I Berm Alton I Autos: 68.46 -6.47 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -23.71 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -27.66 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 61.2 59.6 57.9 Medium Trucks: 55.0 53.8 47.4 Heavy Trucks: 55.8 54.7 45.7 Leq Night 51.8 45.9 47.0 Ldn 60.4 54.4 55.3 CNEL 61.0 54.6 55.4 57.2 52.5 61.0 61.5 Vehicle Noise: 63.1 61.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 1 65 dBA 13 28 14 30 60 d8A 60 64 55 dBA 129 138 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,800 vehicles 9.30% 353 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks: 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.93 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.16 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.12 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 61.2 59.6 57.8 Medium Trucks: 54.8 53.6 47.2 Heavy Trucks: 55.2 54.1 45.0 Leq Night 51.8 45.7 46.3 Ldn 60.4 54.1 54.6 CNEL 61.0 54.4 54.8 Vehicle Noise: 62.9 61.5 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.5 53.8 62.4 62.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 16 17 65 dBA 34 36 60 48,4 73 79 55 dBA 158 169 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,600 vehicles 9.30% 242 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks: 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -8.57 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -25.81 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -29.77 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 59.5 58.0 56.2 Medium Trucks: 53.1 51.9 45.6 Heavy Trucks: 53.5 52.4 43.4 Leq Night 1 Ldn 50.1 44.0 44.6 58.8 52.5 53.0 CNEL I 59.4 52.7 53.1 58.4 53.6 62.2 62.6 Vehicle Noise: 61.2 Ldn: CNEL: 19 70 dBA 18 Wednesday, March 25, 2020 65 dBA 38 41 60 d8A 55 dBA 82 177 88 191 139 59.8 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 56.8 52.0 60.5 61.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 14 15 65 dBA 30 32 60 d&4 64 69 55 dBA 138 148 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 600 vehicles 9.30% 56 vehicles 40 mph 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 40.0 feet 40.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -13.97 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -31.21 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -35.17 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 52.9 51.3 49.6 Medium Trucks: 46.9 45.7 39.4 Heavy Trucks: 48.2 47.1 38.1 Leq Night 43.5 37.8 39.3 Ldn 52.1 46.3 47.7 CNEL 52.7 46.5 47.8 Vehicle Noise: 54.9 53.5 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 6,000 vehicles 9.30% 558 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Ban-ier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Dlsfance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.48 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.72 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.68 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.2 61.6 59.9 Medium Trucks: 57.0 55.8 49.4 Heavy Trucks: 57.8 56.7 47.7 Leq Night 53.8 47.9 48.9 Ldn 62.4 56.3 57.3 CNEL 63.0 56.6 57.4 50.2 45.7 54.2 54.7 Vehicle Noise: 65.1 63.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 4 4 65 dBA 60 dBA 8 16 8 18 55 dBA 36 38 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EA Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,500 vehicles 9.30% 233 vehicles 50 mph 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -8.74 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -25.98 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -29.94 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 59.0 57.4 55.7 Medium Trucks: 52.6 51.4 45.0 Heavy Trucks: 53.0 51.9 42.9 Leq Night Ldn 49.6 43.5 44.1 58.2 52.0 52.5 CNEL 58.8 52.2 52.6 Vehicle Noise: 60.7 59.3 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.5 55.8 64.3 64.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 23 65 dBA 46 49 60 dBA 99 107 55 dBA 214 229 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 28,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,669 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 1.44 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -15.80 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -19.75 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 71.5 69.9 68.1 Medium Trucks: 64.9 63.7 57.3 Heavy Trucks: 64.9 63.8 54.8 Leq Night 62.1 55.8 56.0 Ldn 70.7 64.2 64.4 CNEL 71.3 64.5 64.5 56.2 51.5 60.0 60.5 Vehicle Noise: 73.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 14 15 65 dBA 30 32 60 dBA 64 69 55 dBA 138 148 140 71.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 92 99 68.7 63.8 72.3 65 dBA L 60 dBA 197 425 212 458 72.8 55 dBA 917 986 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 20,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,869 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 -0.11 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -17.34 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -21.30 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 69.9 68.3 66.6 Medium Trucks: 63.3 62.1 55.8 Heavy Trucks: 63.4 62.3 532 Leq Night 60.5 54.2 54.5 Ldn 69.2 62.7 62.8 CNEL 69.8 62.9 63.0 Vehicle Noise: 71.5 70.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,600 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 -0.78 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -18.02 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -21.98 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 69.3 67.7 65.9 Medium Trucks: 62.7 61.5 55.1 Heavy Trucks: 62.7 61.6 52.6 Leq Night 59.9 53.6 53.8 Ldn 68.5 62.0 62.2 CNEL 69.1 62.3 62.3 67.1 62.2 70.8 71.3 Vehicle Noise: 70.8 69.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 72 78 65 dBA 156 168 60 dBA 336 361 55 dBA 723 778 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,500 vehicles 9.30% 884 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.95 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.18 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.14 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.2 64.7 62.9 Medium Trucks: 59.8 58.6 52.3 Heavy Trucks: 60.2 59.1 50.1 Leq Night 56.8 50.7 51.3 Ldn CNEL 65.5 59.2 59.7 66.1 59.4 59.8 Vehicle Noise: 67.9 66.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.4 61.6 70.1 70.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 70 65 dBA 140 151 60 dBA 302 325 55 dBA 652 701 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,125 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.90 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.13 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.09 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.3 65.7 63.9 Medium Trucks: 60.9 59.7 53.3 Heavy Trucks: 61.3 60.2 51.1 Leq Night 57.9 51.6 524 Ldn 66.5 60.2 60.8 CNEL 67.1 60.5 60.9 63.5 58.7 67.2 67.7 Vehicle Noise: 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 38 65 dBA 76 82 60 dBA 55 dBA 164 353 176 379 141 67.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.5 59.7 68.3 68.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 45 65 dBA 89 96 60 dBA 192 207 55 dBA 414 445 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,800 vehicles 9.30% 818 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Ban-ier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.28 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.52 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.47 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 65.9 64.3 62.6 Medium Trucks: 59.5 58.3 51.9 Heavy Trucks: 59.9 58.8 49.8 Leq Night 56.5 50.4 51.0 Ldn 65.1 58.9 59.4 CNEL 65.7 59.1 59.5 Vehicle Noise: 67.6 66.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport 61. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,646 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.24 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.48 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.44 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.9 67.4 65.6 Medium Trucks: 62.5 61.3 55.0 Heavy Trucks: 62.9 61.8 52.8 Leq Night 59.5 53.4 54.1 Ldn 68.2 61.9 62.4 CNEL I 68.8 62.1 62.5 63.1 58.3 66.9 67.4 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 34 36 65 dBA 72 78 60 dBA 156 167 55 dBA 335 360 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,274 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Ban-ier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.36 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.59 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.55 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 67.8 66.2 64.5 Medium Trucks: 61.4 60.2 53.9 Heavy Trucks: 61.8 60.7 517 Leq Night 58.4 52.3 52.9 Ldn 67.0 60.8 61.3 CNEL 67.7 61.0 61.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.5 68.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 69.2 66.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.4 69.9 70.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 115 124 60 dBA 248 266 55 dBA 534 573 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Madison 5t. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,200 vehicles 9.30% 577 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.34 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.58 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.54 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 63.4 61.8 60.0 Medium Trucks: 57.1 55.9 49.6 Heavy Trucks: 58.0 56.9 47.8 Leq Night 53.9 48.0 49.1 Ldn 62.6 56.5 57.4 CNEL 63.2 56.7 57.6 65.0 60.3 68.8 69.3 Vehicle Noise: 65.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 45 48 65 dBA 97 104 60 dBA 209 224 55 dBA 450 483 142 63.8 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.6 55.9 64.5 64.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 22 23 65 dBA 47 51 60 dBA 55 dBA 101 219 109 235 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 995 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.43 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.67 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.62 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 65.2 63.6 61.9 Medium Trucks: 58.8 57.6 51.3 Heavy Trucks: 59.2 58.1 49.1 Leq Night 55.8 49.7 50.3 Ldn 64.4 58.2 58.7 CNEL 65.1 58.4 58.8 Vehicle Noise: 66.9 65.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 967 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten I Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -2.55 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.79 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.75 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 65.1 63.5 61.8 Medium Trucks: 58.7 57.5 51.1 Heavy Trucks: 59.1 58.0 49.0 Leq Night 55.7 49.6 502 Ldn 64.3 58.0 58.6 CNEL 64.9 58.3 58.7 62.4 57.7 66.2 66.7 Vehicle Noise: 66.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 36 38 65 dBA 77 83 60 dBA 166 178 55 dBA 358 384 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,700 vehicles 9.30% 902 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.86 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.09 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.05 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 66.3 64.7 63.0 Medium Trucks: 59.9 58.7 52.4 Heavy Trucks: 60.3 59.2 502 Leq Night 56.9 50.8 51.4 Ldn 65.5 59.3 59.8 CNEL 66.2 59.5 59.9 Vehicle Noise: 68.0 66.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.4 62.3 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.5 66.1 66.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 38 65 dBA 76 81 60 dBA 163 175 55 dBA 351 377 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,300 vehicles 9.30% 772 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.53 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.77 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.73 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 65.7 64.1 62.3 Medium Trucks: 59.2 58.0 51.7 Heavy Trucks: 59.7 58.5 49.5 Leq Night 56.2 50.1 50.8 Ldn 64.9 58.6 59.1 CNEL 65.5 58.8 59.2 63.5 58.8 67.3 67.8 Vehicle Noise: 67.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 36 38 65 dBA 77 83 60 dBA 55 dBA 166 357 178 384 143 65.9 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.9 58.1 66.6 67.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 32 35 65 dBA 69 75 60 dBA 150 181 55 dBA 322 346 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,100 vehicles 9.30% 660 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.21 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.45 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.41 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 65.0 63.4 61.6 Medium Trucks: 58.6 57.4 51.0 Heavy Trucks: 59.0 57.9 48.8 Leq Night 55.6 49.5 50.1 Ldn 64.2 57.9 58.4 CNEL 64.8 58.2 58.6 Vehicle Noise: 66.7 65.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 5,400 vehicles 9.30% 502 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.40 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.64 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.59 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 63.8 62.2 60.4 Medium Trucks: 57.4 56.2 49.8 Heavy Trucks: 57.8 56.7 47.6 Leq Night 54.4 48.3 48.9 Ldn 63.0 56.7 57.3 CNEL 63.6 57.0 57.4 62.2 57.4 66.0 66.4 Vehicle Noise: 65.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 29 31 65 dBA 63 67 60 dBA 135 145 55 dBA 290 312 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,256 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.42 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.66 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.61 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 67.8 66.2 64.4 Medium Trucks: 61.3 60.2 53.8 Heavy Trucks: 61.8 60.7 51.6 Leq Night 58.4 52.2 52.9 Ldn 67.0 60.7 61.2 CNEL 67.6 60.9 61.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.5 68.0 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.0 61.0 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 56.2 64.8 65.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 24 26 65 dBA 52 58 60 dBA 112 121 55 dBA 242 260 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,376 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.02 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.26 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.22 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.2 66.6 64.8 Medium Trucks: 61.7 60.6 54.2 Heavy Trucks: 62.2 61.1 52.0 Leq Night 58.8 52.6 53.3 Ldn 67.4 61.1 61.6 CNEL 68.0 61.3 61.8 65.0 60.2 68.7 69.2 Vehicle Noise: 69.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 45 48 65 dBA 96 103 60 dBA I 55 dBA 207 446 222 479 144 68.4 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.4 60.6 69.1 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 47 51 65 dBA 102 110 60 48,4 220 236 55 dBA 474 509 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,125 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.90 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.13 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.09 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.8 64.2 62.4 Medium Trucks: 59.3 58.1 51.8 Heavy Trucks: 59.8 58.7 49.6 Leq Night 56.4 50.2 50.9 Ldn 65.0 58.7 59.2 CNEL 65.6 58.9 59.3 Vehicle Noise: 67.5 66.0 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,079 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.08 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.32 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.27 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.1 65.5 63.8 Medium Trucks: 60.7 59.5 53.1 Heavy Trucks: 61.1 60.0 51.0 Leq Night 57.7 51.6 52.2 Ldn 66.3 60.1 60.6 CNEL 66.9 60.3 60.7 63.0 58.2 66.7 67.2 Vehicle Noise: 68.8 67.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 39 42 65 dBA 84 90 60 dBA 180 194 55 dBA 388 417 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,274 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.36 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.59 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.55 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.8 66.2 64.5 Medium Trucks: 61.4 60.2 53.9 Heavy Trucks: 61.8 60.7 517 Leq Night 58.4 52.3 52.9 Ldn CNEL 67.0 60.8 61.3 67.7 61.0 61.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.5 68.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.3 59.5 68.1 68.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 40 43 65 dBA 87 93 60 dBA 187 201 55 dBA 403 433 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,000 vehicles 9.30% 744 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.69 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.93 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.89 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.5 63.9 62.1 Medium Trucks: 59.1 57.9 51.5 Heavy Trucks: 59.5 58.4 49.4 Leq Night 56.1 50.0 50.6 Ldn 64.7 58.4 59.0 CNEL 65.3 58.7 59.1 65.0 60.3 68.8 69.3 Vehicle Noise: 67.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 45 48 65 dBA 97 104 60 dBA 209 224 55 dBA 450 483 145 65.8 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.7 57.9 66.5 66.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 31 34 65 dBA 68 73 60 dBA 55 dBA 146 314 157 338 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Airport D. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,300 vehicles 9.30% 400 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrer Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.39 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.63 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.58 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.8 61.2 59.4 Medium Trucks: 56.4 55.2 48.8 Heavy Trucks: 56.8 55.7 46.7 Leq Night 53.4 47.3 47.9 Ldn 62.0 55.7 56.3 CNEL 62.6 56.0 56.4 Vehicle Noise: 64.5 63.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.0 55.2 63.8 64.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 22 65 dBA 45 48 60 dBA 96 104 55 dBA 208 223 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,600 vehicles 9.30% 521 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.78 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.02 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.98 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.9 61.3 59.6 Medium Trucks: 56.7 55.5 49.1 Heavy Trucks: 57.5 56.4 47.4 Leq Night 53.5 47.6 48.6 Ldn 62.1 56.0 57.0 CNEL 62.7 56.3 57.1 Vehicle Noise: 64.8 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 3,400 vehicles 9.30% 316 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrer Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -6.95 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -24.19 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -28.15 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 60.7 59.2 57.4 Medium Trucks: 54.5 53.3 47.0 Heavy Trucks: 55.4 54.3 45.2 Leq Night 51.3 45.4 46.5 Ldn 60.0 53.9 54.8 CNEL 60.6 54.1 55.0 Vehicle Noise: 62.6 61.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.0 53.3 61.9 62.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 15 16 65 dBA 32 34 60 dBA 68 73 55 dBA 146 157 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,700 vehicles 9.30% 437 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.00 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.24 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.20 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.1 60.5 58.8 Medium Trucks: 55.7 54.5 48.1 Heavy Trucks: 56.1 55.0 46.0 Leq Night 52.7 46.6 472 Ldn 61.3 55.1 55.6 CNEL 61.9 55.3 55.7 63.3 60.2 55.5 64.0 64.5 Vehicle Noise: 63.8 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA I 20 22 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA 44 95 204 47 102 219 146 62.4 59.3 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 54.5 63.1 63.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 20 22 65 dBA 44 47 60 dBA 55 dBA 95 204 102 220 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,200 vehicles 9.30% 298 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 59.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 59.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -7.67 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.91 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.87 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 60.4 58.9 57.1 Medium Trucks: 54.0 52.8 46.5 Heavy Trucks: 54.4 53.3 443 Leq Night 51.0 44.9 45.5 Ldn 59.7 53.4 53.9 CNEL 60.3 53.6 54.0 Vehicle Noise: 62.1 60.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 1,800 vehicles 9.30% 167 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 40.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 40.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 66.51 -9.20 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -26.44 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -30.40 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 57.7 56.1 543 Medium Trucks: 51.7 50.5 44.1 Heavy Trucks: 53.0 51.9 42.9 Leq Night Ldn 48.3 42.6 44.1 56.9 51.1 52.5 CNEL 57.5 51.3 52.6 57.7 52.9 61.4 61.9 Vehicle Noise: 59.7 58.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 16 17 65 dBA 34 37 60 dBA 73 79 55 dBA 158 170 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,300 vehicles 9.30% 679 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -3.63 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -20.87 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -24.83 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.1 62.5 607 Medium Trucks: 57.8 56.6 50.3 Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 58.7 57.6 48.5 Leq Night 54.7 48.7 49.8 Ldn 63.3 57.2 58.1 CNEL 63.9 57.4 58.3 65.9 64.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 55.0 50.5 59.0 59.4 70 dBA 65 dBA Ldn: 7 16 CNEL: 8 17 Wednesday, March 25, 2020 60 dBA 34 37 55 dBA 74 79 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAP Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,200 vehicles 9.30% 298 vehicles 50 mph 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -7.67 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.91 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.87 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 60.1 58.5 567 Medium Trucks: 53.7 52.5 46.1 Heavy Trucks: 54.1 53.0 43.9 Leq Night Ldn 50.7 44.6 45.2 59.3 53.0 53.5 CNEL 59.9 53.3 53.7 61.3 56.6 65.2 65.6 Vehicle Noise: 61.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 24 26 65 dBA 53 56 60 dBA 55 dBA 113 244 121 262 147 60.4 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.3 52.5 61.1 61.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 16 17 65 dBA 35 38 60 dBA 75 81 55 dBA 163 175 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC21 Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 32,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,976 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 1.91 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -15.32 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -19.28 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 72.0 70.4 68.6 Medium Trucks: 65.4 64.2 57.8 Heavy Trucks: 65.4 64.3 55.2 Leq Night 62.5 56.3 56.5 Ldn 71.2 64.7 64.9 CNEL 71.8 65.0 65.0 Vehicle Noise: 73.5 72.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC21 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 22,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,130 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 0.46 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.78 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.73 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.5 68.9 67.1 Medium Trucks: 63.9 62.7 56.3 Heavy Trucks: 63.9 62.8 53.8 Leq Night 61.1 54.8 55.0 Ldn 69.7 63.3 63.4 CNEL 70.3 63.5 63.5 69.1 64.3 72.8 73.3 Vehicle Noise: 72.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 99 106 65 dBA 212 228 60 dBA 458 492 55 dBA 986 1,060 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAC21 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 18,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,711 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 -0.49 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -17.73 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -21.68 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 69.5 68.0 66.2 Medium Trucks: 63.0 61.8 55.4 Heavy Trucks: 63.0 61.9 52.8 Leq Night 60.1 53.9 54.1 Ldn 68.8 62.3 62.5 CNEL 69.4 62.5 62.6 Vehicle Noise: 71.1 69.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 70.6 67.7 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.8 71.4 71.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 79 85 65 dBA 170 183 60 dBA 366 394 55 dBA 789 848 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAC21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,200 vehicles 9.30% 763 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.59 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.82 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.78 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.6 64.0 62.2 Medium Trucks: 59.2 58.0 51.6 Heavy Trucks: 59.6 58.5 49.5 Leq Night 56.2 50.1 507 Ldn 64.8 58.5 59.1 CNEL 65.4 58.8 59.2 66.7 61.9 70.4 70.9 Vehicle Noise: 67.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 68 73 65 dBA 147 158 60 dBA 316 340 55 dBA 682 733 148 65.9 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.8 58.0 66.6 67.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 32 34 65 dBA 69 74 60 dBA 148 159 55 dBA 320 343 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,400 vehicles 9.30% 874 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Berner Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.99 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.23 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.19 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.2 64.6 62.8 Medium Tmcks: 59.8 58.6 52.2 Heavy Trucks: 60.2 59.1 50.1 Leq Night 56.8 50.7 51.3 Ldn 65.4 59.1 59.7 CNEL 66.0 59.4 59.8 Vehicle Noise: 67.9 66.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAC21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 7,500 vehicles 9.30% 698 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrer Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -3.97 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.21 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.17 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.2 63.6 61.9 Medium Tmcks: 58.8 57.6 51.2 Heavy Trucks: 59.2 58.1 49.1 Leq Night 55.8 49.7 50.3 Ldn 64.4 58.2 58.7 CNEL 65.0 58.4 58.8 63.4 58.6 67.2 67.6 Vehicle Noise: 66.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 38 65 dBA 75 81 60 dBA 162 175 55 dBA 350 376 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAC21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,283 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrer Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.32 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.56 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.52 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.9 66.3 64.5 Medium Tmcks: 61.4 60.3 53.9 Heavy Trucks: 61.9 60.8 517 Leq Night 58.5 52.3 53.0 Ldn 67.1 60.8 61.3 CNEL 67.7 61.0 61.5 Vehicle Noise: 69.6 68.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.5 62.4 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.6 66.2 66.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 30 32 65 dBA 65 70 60 dBA 140 150 55 dBA 301 324 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAC21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,051 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.19 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.43 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.39 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.0 65.4 63.6 Medium Tmcks: 60.6 59.4 53.0 Heavy Trucks: 61.0 59.9 50.9 Leq Night 57.6 51.5 52.1 Ldn 66.2 59.9 60.5 CNEL 66.8 60.2 60.6 65.1 60.3 68.8 69.3 Vehicle Noise: 68.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 45 49 65 dBA 97 105 60 dBA 55 dBA 210 452 225 486 149 67.3 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.2 59.4 68.0 68.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 40 43 65 dBA 85 92 60 48,4 55 dBA 184 396 197 425 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,700 vehicles 9.30% 437 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -5.55 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.78 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.74 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.1 60.6 58.8 Medium Trucks: 55.9 54.7 48.4 Heavy Trucks: 56.8 55.7 46.6 Leq Night 52.7 46.8 47.9 Ldn 61.4 55.3 56.2 CNEL 62.0 55.5 56.4 Vehicle Noise: 64.0 62.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,190 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation.- Road levation:Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -1.65 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.89 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.85 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.0 64.4 62.7 Medium Trucks: 59.6 58.4 52.0 Heavy Trucks: 60.0 58.9 49.9 Leq Night 56.6 50.5 51.1 Ldn 65.2 58.9 59.5 CNEL 65.8 59.2 59.6 59.4 54.7 63.3 63.7 Vehicle Noise: 67.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 dBA 18 39 19 42 60 dBA 84 91 55 dBA 182 195 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAC21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 995 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.43 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.67 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.62 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.2 63.6 61.9 Medium Trucks: 58.8 57.6 51.3 Heavy Trucks: 59.2 58.1 49.1 Leq Night 55.8 49.7 50.3 Ldn 64.4 58.2 58.7 CNEL 65.1 58.4 58.8 Vehicle Noise: 66.9 65.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.3 63.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.4 67.0 67.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 40 43 65 dBA 87 93 60 dBA 187 201 55 dBA 403 433 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAC21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,500 vehicles 9.30% 791 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.43 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.67 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.62 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.8 64.2 62.4 Medium Trucks: 59.3 58.1 51.8 Heavy Trucks: 59.8 58.7 49.6 Leq Night 56.4 50.2 50.9 Ldn 65.0 58.7 59.2 CNEL 65.6 58.9 59.3 62.4 57.7 66.2 66.7 Vehicle Noise: 67.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 36 38 65 dBA 77 83 60 dBA 55 dBA 166 358 178 384 150 66.0 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.0 58.2 66.7 67.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 33 35 65 dBA 71 76 60 dBA 55 dBA 152 327 163 352 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,800 vehicles 9.30% 632 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.40 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.64 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.59 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.8 63.2 61.4 Medium Trucks: 58.4 57.2 50.8 Heavy Trucks: 58.8 57.7 48.6 Leq Night 55.4 49.3 49.9 Ldn 64.0 57.7 58.3 CNEL 64.6 58.0 58.4 Vehicle Noise: 66.5 65.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 6,700 vehicles 9.30% 623 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.46 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.70 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.66 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.7 63.1 61.4 Medium Trucks: 58.3 57.1 50.8 Heavy Trucks: 58.7 57.6 48.6 Leq Night 55.3 49.2 49.8 Ldn 63.9 57.7 58.2 CNEL 64.5 57.9 58.3 62.0 57.2 65.8 66.2 Vehicle Noise: 66.4 65.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 28 30 65 dBA 61 65 60 dBA 131 141 55 dBA 282 303 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAC21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,400 vehicles 9.30% 595 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.66 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.90 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.86 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.5 62.9 61.2 Medium Trucks: 58.1 56.9 50.6 Heavy Trucks: 58.5 57.4 48.4 Leq Night 55.1 49.0 49.6 Ldn 63.7 57.5 58.0 CNEL 64.3 57.7 58.1 Vehicle Noise: 66.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.9 57.2 65.7 66.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 28 30 65 dBA 60 65 60 dBA 130 139 55 dBA 279 300 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAC21 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 16,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,553 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.50 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.73 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.69 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.7 67.1 65.3 Medium Trucks: 62.3 61.1 54.7 Heavy Trucks: 62.7 61.6 52.5 Leq Night 59.3 53.2 53.8 Ldn 67.9 61.6 62.2 CNEL 68.5 61.9 62.3 64.8 61.7 57.0 65.5 66.0 Vehicle Noise: 70.4 69.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 27 29 65 dBA 58 63 60 dBA 55 dBA 126 271 135 291 151 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.9 61.1 69.7 70.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 51 55 65 dBA 111 119 60 dBA 238 256 55 dBA 514 552 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC21 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,358 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.08 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.32 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.27 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.1 66.5 64.8 Medium Trucks: 61.7 60.5 54.1 Heavy Trucks: 62.1 61.0 52.0 Leq Night 58.7 52.6 53.2 Ldn 67.3 61.1 61.6 CNEL 67.9 61.3 61.7 Vehicle Noise: 69.8 68.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC21 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,032 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten I Autos: 70.20 -2.27 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.51 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.46 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.4 63.8 62.0 Medium Trucks: 59.0 57.8 51.4 Heavy Trucks: 59.4 58.3 49.2 Leq Night 56.0 49.9 50.5 Ldn 64.6 58.3 58.8 CNEL 65.2 58.6 59.0 65.3 60.5 69.1 69.6 Vehicle Noise: 67.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 47 50 65 dBA 101 109 60 dBA 218 234 55 dBA 470 504 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC21 Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,070 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.12 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.36 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.31 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.1 65.5 63.7 Medium Trucks: 60.7 59.5 53.1 Heavy Trucks: 61.1 60.0 50.9 Leq Night 57.7 51.6 52.2 Ldn 66.3 60.0 60.5 CNEL 66.9 60.2 60.7 Vehicle Noise: 68.8 67.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.7 62.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.8 66.4 66.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 37 39 65 dBA 79 85 60 dBA 170 183 55 dBA 367 394 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC21 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,014 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.35 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.59 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.54 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.8 65.3 63.5 Medium Trucks: 60.4 59.2 52.9 Heavy Trucks: 60.8 59.7 507 Leq Night 57.4 51.3 51.9 Ldn 66.1 59.8 60.3 CNEL 66.7 60.0 60.4 64.3 59.5 68.1 68.5 Vehicle Noise: 68.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 40 43 65 dBA 86 93 60 dBA 55 dBA 186 400 200 430 152 67.1 64.1 59.3 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.8 68.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 39 42 65 dBA 83 89 60 dBA 179 193 55 dBA 386 415 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC21 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,500 vehicles 9.30% 605 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.59 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.83 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.79 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.6 63.0 61.2 Medium Trucks: 58.2 57.0 50.6 Heavy Trucks: 58.6 57.5 48.5 Leq Night 55.2 49.1 49.7 Ldn 63.8 57.5 58.1 CNEL 64.4 57.8 58.2 Vehicle Noise: 66.3 64.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC21 Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 2,900 vehicles 9.30% 270 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -8.10 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -25.34 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -29.29 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 61.1 59.5 577 Medium Trucks: 54.7 53.5 47.1 Heavy Trucks: 55.1 54.0 44.9 Leq Night 51.7 45.6 46.2 Ldn 60.3 54.0 54.6 CNEL 60.9 54.3 54.7 61.8 57.0 65.6 66.0 Vehicle Noise: 62.8 61.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 27 29 65 dBA 59 63 60 d8A 127 137 55 dBA 274 294 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC21 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,800 vehicles 9.30% 446 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -5.45 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.69 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.65 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.2 60.7 58.9 Medium Trucks: 56.0 54.8 48.5 Heavy Trucks: 56.9 55.8 467 Leq Night 52.8 46.9 48.0 Ldn 61.5 55.4 56.3 CNEL 62.1 55.6 56.5 Vehicle Noise: 64.1 62.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.3 53.5 62.1 62.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 16 17 65 dBA 34 37 60 d&4 74 80 55 dBA 160 172 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,AC21 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,800 vehicles 9.30% 446 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -5.45 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.69 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.65 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.2 60.7 58.9 Medium Trucks: 56.0 54.8 48.5 Heavy Trucks: 56.9 55.8 46.7 Leq Night 52.8 46.9 48.0 Ldn 61.5 55.4 56.3 CNEL 62.1 55.6 56.5 59.5 54.8 63.4 63.8 Vehicle Noise: 64.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 dBA 18 40 20 43 60 dBA 55 dBA 86 184 92 198 153 62.7 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.5 54.8 63.4 63.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 18 20 65 dBA 40 43 60 d8A 86 92 55 dBA 184 198 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC21 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,700 vehicles 9.30% 251 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -8.41 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -25.65 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -29.60 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 59.7 58.1 56.4 Medium Trucks: 53.3 52.1 45.7 Heavy Trucks: 53.7 52.6 43.6 Leq Night Ldn 50.3 442 44.8 58.9 52.6 53.2 CNEL 59.5 52.9 53.3 Vehicle Noise: 61.4 60.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC21 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 2,100 vehicles 9.30% 195 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -9.50 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -26.74 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -30.70 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 58.6 57.0 55.3 Medium Trucks: 52.2 51.0 44.6 Heavy Trucks: 52.6 51.5 42.5 Leq Night 49.2 43.1 43.7 Ldn 57.8 51.6 52.1 CNEL 58.4 51.8 52.2 56.9 52.1 60.7 61.2 Vehicle Noise: 60.3 58.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 14 15 65 dBA 30 33 60 dBA 66 70 55 dBA 141 152 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC21 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 700 vehicles 9.30% 65 vehicles 40 mph 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 40.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 40.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -13.30 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -30.54 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -34.50 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 53.6 52.0 502 Medium Trucks: 47.6 46.4 40.0 Heavy Trucks: 48.9 47.8 38.8 Leq Night 44.2 38.5 40.0 Ldn 52.8 47.0 48.4 CNEL 53.4 47.2 48.5 Vehicle Noise: 55.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 55.8 51.0 59.6 60.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 12 13 65 dBA 26 28 60 dBA 55 60 55 dBA 119 128 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC21 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,700 vehicles 9.30% 437 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -5.55 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.78 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.74 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.1 60.6 58.8 Medium Trucks: 55.9 54.7 48.4 Heavy Trucks: 56.8 55.7 46.6 Leq Night 52.7 46.8 47.9 Ldn 61.4 55.3 56.2 CNEL 62.0 55.5 56.4 54.2 50.9 46.4 54.9 55.3 Vehicle Noise: 64.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 4 4 65 dBA 8 60 dBA 18 20 55 dBA 39 42 154 62.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.4 54.7 63.3 63.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 18 19 65 dBA 39 42 60 dBA 55 dBA 84 182 91 195 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC21 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,400 vehicles 9.30% 409 vehicles 50 mph 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.29 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.53 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.48 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 61.5 59.9 58.1 Medium Trucks: 55.0 53.9 47.5 Heavy Trucks: 55.5 54.4 45.3 Leq Night 52.1 45.9 46.6 Ldn 60.7 54.4 54.9 CNEL 61.3 54.6 55.1 Vehicle Noise: 63.2 61.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 32,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,985 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten I Berm Atten I Autos: 71.78 1.93 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -15.31 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -19.27 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 72.0 70.4 68.6 Medium Trucks: 65.4 64.2 57.8 Heavy Trucks: 65.4 64.3 55.3 Leq Night 62.6 56.3 56.5 Ldn 71.2 64.7 64.9 CNEL 71.8 65.0 65.0 58.7 53.9 62.5 62.9 Vehicle Noise: 73.5 72.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 20 22 65 dBA 43 47 60 dBA 93 100 55 dBA 201 216 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 23,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,139 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 0.48 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.76 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.71 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 70.5 68.9 672 Medium Trucks: 63.9 62.7 56.4 Heavy Trucks: 64.0 62.9 53.8 Leq Night 61.1 54.8 55.1 Ldn 69.7 63.3 63.4 CNEL 70.3 63.5 63.5 Vehicle Noise: 72.1 70.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 69.1 64.3 72.8 73.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 99 106 65 dBA 213 229 60 dBA 458 493 55 dBA 988 1,063 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 18,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,730 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 -0.44 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -17.68 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -21.64 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 69.6 68.0 66.2 Medium Trucks: 63.0 61.8 55.4 Heavy Trucks: 63.0 61.9 52.9 Leq Night 60.2 53.9 54.1 Ldn 68.8 62.4 62.5 CNEL I 69.4 62.6 62.6 67.7 62.8 71.4 71.9 Vehicle Noise: 71.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 79 85 65 dBA 170 183 60 dBA 367 395 55 dBA 791 851 155 69.7 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.8 61.9 70.5 70.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 69 74 65 dBA 148 159 I 60 dBA 319 343 55 dBA 687 739 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FACP21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,300 vehicles 9.30% 772 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.53 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.77 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.73 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.7 64.1 62.3 Medium Trucks: 59.2 58.0 51.7 Heavy Trucks: 59.7 58.5 49.5 Leq Night 56.2 50.1 50.8 Ldn 64.9 58.6 59.1 CNEL 65.5 58.8 59.2 Vehicle Noise: 67.4 65.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 9,500 vehicles 9.30% 884 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -2.95 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.18 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.14 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.2 64.7 62.9 Medium Trucks: 59.8 58.6 52.3 Heavy Trucks: 60.2 59.1 50.1 Leq Night 56.8 50.7 51.3 Ldn 65.5 59.2 59.7 CNEL 66.1 59.4 59.8 62.9 58.1 66.6 67.1 Vehicle Noise: 67.9 66.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 32 35 65 dBA 69 75 60 dBA 150 161 55 dBA 322 346 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,800 vehicles 9.30% 725 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.80 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.04 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.00 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.4 63.8 62.0 Medium Trucks: 59.0 57.8 51.4 Heavy Trucks: 59.4 58.3 492 Leq Night 56.0 49.9 50.5 Ldn 64.6 58.3 58.8 CNEL 65.2 58.6 59.0 Vehicle Noise: 67.1 65.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.5 58.7 67.2 67.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 38 65 dBA 76 82 60 dBA 164 176 55 dBA 353 379 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,339 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.14 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.38 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.33 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.0 66.5 647 Medium Trucks: 61.6 60.4 54.1 Heavy Trucks: 62.0 60.9 51.9 Leq Night 58.6 52.5 53.2 Ldn 67.3 61.0 61.5 CNEL 67.9 61.2 61.6 62.6 57.8 66.4 66.8 Vehicle Noise: 69.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA I 31 33 65 dBA 67 72 60 dBA 143 154 55 dBA 309 332 156 68.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.3 60.5 69.0 69.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 47 50 65 dBA 100 108 60 dB,4 216 232 55 dBA 465 500 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FACP21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,125 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.90 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.13 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.09 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 67.3 65.7 63.9 Medium Trucks: 60.9 59.7 53.3 Heavy Trucks: 61.3 60.2 51.1 Leq Night 57.9 51.8 52.4 Ldn 66.5 60.2 60.8 CNEL 67.1 60.5 60.9 Vehicle Noise: 69.0 67.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 5,000 vehicles 9.30% 465 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten I Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -5.28 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.51 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.47 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 62.4 60.8 59.1 Medium Trucks: 56.2 55.0 48.6 Heavy Trucks: 57.0 55.9 46.9 Leq Night 53.0 47.1 48.1 Ldn 61.6 55.6 56.5 CNEL 62.2 55.8 56.6 64.5 59.7 68.3 68.7 Vehicle Noise: 64.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 45 65 dBA 89 96 60 dBA 192 207 55 dBA 414 445 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,200 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centedine Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Bonn Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.62 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.86 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.81 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 66.0 64.5 62.7 Medium Trucks: 59.6 58.4 52.1 Heavy Trucks: 60.0 58.9 49.9 Leq Night 56.6 50.5 51.1 Ldn 65.3 59.0 59.5 CNEL 65.9 59.2 59.6 Vehicle Noise: 67.7 66.3 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.8 59.7 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 55.0 63.5 64.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 19 20 65 dBA 41 44 60 dBA 88 94 55 dBA 189 203 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,004 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.39 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.63 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.58 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 65.3 63.7 61.9 Medium Trucks: 58.8 57.7 51.3 Heavy Trucks: 59.3 58.2 49.1 Leq Night 55.9 49.7 50.4 Ldn 64.5 58.2 58.7 CNEL 65.1 58.4 58.9 63.3 58.5 67.0 67.5 Vehicle Noise: 67.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 87 94 60 dBA I 55 dBA 188 405 202 435 157 65.5 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.5 57.7 66.3 66.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 36 39 65 dBA 78 83 60 dBA 55 dBA 167 360 180 387 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,600 vehicles 9.30% 800 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.38 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.62 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.57 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.8 64.2 62.5 Medium Trucks: 59.4 58.2 51.8 Heavy Trucks: 59.8 58.7 49.7 Leq Night 56.4 50.3 50.9 Ldn 65.0 58.8 59.3 CNEL 65.6 59.0 59.4 Vehicle Noise: 67.5 66.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 6,900 vehicles 9.30% 642 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -4.34 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.57 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.53 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.9 63.3 61.5 Medium Trucks: 58.4 57.2 50.9 Heavy Trucks: 58.9 57.7 48.7 Leq Night 55.4 49.3 50.0 Ldn 64.1 57.8 58.3 CNEL 64.7 58.0 58.4 63.0 58.2 66.8 67.3 Vehicle Noise: 66.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 33 35 65 dBA 71 76 60 dBA 153 165 55 dBA 330 354 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,900 vehicles 9.30% 642 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.34 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.57 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.53 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.9 63.3 61.5 Medium Trucks: 58.4 57.2 50.9 Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 58.9 57.7 48.7 Leq Night 55.4 49.3 50.0 Ldn 64.1 57.8 58.3 CNEL 64.7 58.0 58.4 66.6 65.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.1 62.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.3 65.8 66.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 28 31 65 dBA 61 66 60 dBA 132 142 55 dBA 285 306 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,400 vehicles 9.30% 595 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.66 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.90 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.86 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.5 62.9 61.2 Medium Trucks: 58.1 56.9 50.6 Heavy Trucks: 58.5 57.4 48.4 Leq Night 55.1 49.0 49.6 Ldn 63.7 57.5 58.0 CNEL 64.3 57.7 58.1 62.1 57.3 65.8 66.3 Vehicle Noise: 66.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 28 31 65 dBA 61 66 60 dBA 55 dBA 132 285 142 306 158 64.8 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.7 57.0 65.5 66.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 27 29 65 dBA 58 63 60 dBA 55 dBA 126 271 135 291 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP21 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 16,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,562 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.47 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.71 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.66 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.7 67.1 65.4 Medium Trucks: 62.3 61.1 54.7 Heavy Trucks: 62.7 61.6 52.6 Leq Night 59.3 53.2 53.8 Ldn 67.9 61.7 62.2 CNEL 68.5 61.9 62.3 Vehicle Noise: 70.4 69.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP21 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,358 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.08 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.32 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.27 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.1 66.5 64.8 Medium Trucks: 61.7 60.5 54.1 Heavy Trucks: 62.1 61.0 52.0 Leq Night 58.7 52.6 53.2 Ldn 67.3 61.1 61.6 CNEL 67.9 61.3 61.7 65.9 61.2 69.7 70.2 Vehicle Noise: 69.8 68.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 52 55 65 dBA 111 119 60 dBA 239 257 55 dBA 516 554 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP21 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,032 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.27 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.51 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.46 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.4 63.8 62.0 Medium Trucks: 59.0 57.8 51.4 Heavy Trucks: 59.4 58.3 492 Leq Night 56.0 49.9 50.5 Ldn 64.6 58.3 58.8 CNEL 65.2 58.6 59.0 Vehicle Noise: 67.1 65.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.3 60.5 69.1 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 47 50 65 dBA 101 109 60 dBA 218 234 55 dBA 470 504 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP21 Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,079 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.08 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.32 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.27 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.1 65.5 63.8 Medium Trucks: 60.7 59.5 53.1 Heavy Trucks: 61.1 60.0 51.0 Leq Night 57.7 51.6 52.2 Ldn 66.3 60.1 60.6 CNEL 66.9 60.3 60.7 62.6 57.8 66.4 66.8 Vehicle Noise: 68.8 67.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 37 39 65 dBA 79 85 60 dBA 55 dBA 170 367 183 394 159 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.3 59.5 68.1 68.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 40 43 65 dBA 87 93 60 dBA 187 201 55 dBA 403 433 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FACP21 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,032 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.27 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.51 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.46 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.9 65.3 63.6 Medium Trucks: 60.5 59.3 52.9 Heavy Trucks: 60.9 59.8 50.8 Leq Night 57.5 51.4 520 Ldn 66.1 59.9 60.4 CNEL 66.7 60.1 60.5 Vehicle Noise: 68.6 67.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.1 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FACP21 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 6,600 vehicles 9.30% 614 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.53 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.77 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.72 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.7 63.1 61.3 Medium Trucks: 58.2 57.0 50.7 Heavy Trucks: 58.7 57.6 48.5 Leq Night 55.3 49.1 49.8 Ldn 63.9 57.6 58.1 CNEL 64.5 57.8 58.2 59.4 67.9 68.4 Vehicle Noise: 66.4 64.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 39 42 65 dBA 84 91 60 dBA 182 195 55 dBA 391 420 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,000 vehicles 9.30% 279 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -7.95 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -25.19 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -29.15 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 61.2 59.6 57.9 Medium Trucks: 54.8 53.6 47.3 Heavy Trucks: 55.2 54.1 45.1 Leq Night 51.8 45.7 46.3 Ldn 60.5 54.2 54.7 CNEL 61.1 54.4 54.8 Vehicle Noise: 62.9 61.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.9 57.1 65.6 66.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 28 30 65 dBA 60 64 60 dBA 128 138 55 dBA 277 297 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP21 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,100 vehicles 9.30% 474 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -5.19 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.43 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.38 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.5 60.9 592 Medium Trucks: 56.3 55.1 48.7 Heavy Trucks: 57.1 56.0 47.0 Leq Night 53.1 47.2 48.2 Ldn 61.7 55.6 56.6 CNEL 62.3 55.9 56.7 58.4 53.7 62.2 62.7 Vehicle Noise: 64.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 16 18 65 dBA 35 38 60 dBA 55 dBA 76 163 82 176 160 62.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.8 55.1 63.6 64.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 19 21 65 dBA 41 44 60 dBA 55 dBA 89 192 96 206 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP21 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,300 vehicles 9.30% 493 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -5.02 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.26 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.22 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.7 61.1 59.3 Medium Trucks: 56.4 55.3 48.9 Heavy Trucks: 57.3 56.2 472 Leq Night 53.3 47.3 48.4 Ldn 61.9 55.8 56.8 CNEL 62.5 56.0 56.9 Vehicle Noise: 64.5 63.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP21 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 2,900 vehicles 9.30% 270 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 59.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 59.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -8.10 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -25.34 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -29.29 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 60.0 58.4 567 Medium Trucks: 53.6 52.4 46.0 Heavy Trucks: 54.0 52.9 43.9 Leq Night Ldn 50.6 44.5 45.1 59.2 53.0 53.5 CNEL 59.8 53.2 53.6 59.9 55.3 63.8 64.3 Vehicle Noise: 61.7 60.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 20 21 65 dBA 42 46 60 dBA 91 98 55 dBA 197 211 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP21 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,300 vehicles 9.30% 214 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -9.11 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -26.34 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -30.30 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 59.0 57.4 55.7 Medium Trucks: 52.6 51.4 45.0 Heavy Trucks: 53.0 51.9 42.9 Leq Night Ldn 49.6 43.5 44.1 58.2 51.9 52.5 CNEL 58.8 52.2 52.6 Vehicle Noise: 60.7 59.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.2 52.4 61.0 61.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 15 16 65 dBA 32 34 60 dBA 69 74 55 dBA 148 159 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP21 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 900 vehicles 9.30% 84 vehicles 40 mph 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 40.0 feet 40.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -12.21 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -29.45 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -33.41 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 54.7 53.1 51.3 Medium Trucks: 48.7 47.5 41.1 Heavy Trucks: 50.0 48.9 39.9 Leq Night 45.3 39.6 41.1 Ldn 53.9 48.0 49.5 CNEL 54.5 48.3 49.6 56.2 51.4 60.0 60.5 Vehicle Noise: 56.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 dBA 13 27 14 29 60 dBA 55 dBA 59 127 63 136 161 55.3 52.0 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 47.5 56.0 56.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 5 65 dBA 10 11 60 dBA 22 23 55 dBA 47 50 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,ACP21 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,100 vehicles 9.30% 474 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -5.19 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.43 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.38 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.5 60.9 59.2 Medium Trucks: 56.3 55.1 48.7 Heavy Trucks: 57.1 56.0 47.0 Leq Night 53.1 472 48.2 Ldn 61.7 55.6 56.6 CNEL 62.3 55.9 56.7 Vehicle Noise: 64.3 62.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.8 55.1 63.6 64.1 70 dBA 65 dBA Ldn: 19 41 CNEL: 21 44 Wednesday, March 25, 2020 60 dBA 89 96 55 dBA 192 206 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC23 Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 33,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,143 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 2.15 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -15.09 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -19.04 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 72.2 70.6 68.8 Medium Trucks: 65.6 64.4 58.0 Heavy Trucks: 65.6 64.5 55.5 Leq Night 62.8 56.5 56.7 Ldn 71.4 65.0 65.1 CNEL 72.0 65.2 65.2 Vehicle Noise: 73.8 72.3 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,ACP21 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 4,600 vehicles 9.30% 428 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.10 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.33 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.29 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 61.7 60.1 58.3 Medium Trucks: 55.2 54.0 47.7 Heavy Trucks: 55.7 54.6 45.5 Leq Night 52.3 46.1 46.8 Ldn 60.9 54.6 55.1 CNEL 61.5 54.8 55.3 Vehicle Noise: 63.4 61.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.9 54.1 62.6 63.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 22 65 dBA 45 48 60 dBA 96 103 55 dBA 207 222 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,AC23 Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 24,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,232 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 0.66 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.57 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.53 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.7 69.1 67.4 Medium Trucks: 64.1 62.9 56.6 Heavy Trucks: 64.1 63.0 54.0 Leq Night 61.3 55.0 55.2 Ldn 69.9 63.5 63.6 CNEL 70.5 63.7 63.7 69.4 64.5 73.1 73.5 Vehicle Noise: 72.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 102 110 65 dBA 220 237 60 dBA 55 dBA 475 1,022 510 1,100 162 70.8 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.9 63.0 71.6 72.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 81 88 65 dBA 175 189 60 dBA 378 406 55 dBA 814 875 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 19,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,841 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Berner Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 -0.17 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -17.41 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -21.37 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 69.9 68.3 66.5 Medium Trucks: 63.3 62.1 55.7 Heavy Trucks: 63.3 62.2 53.2 Leq Night 60.5 54.2 54.4 Ldn 69.1 62.6 62.8 CNEL 69.7 62.9 62.9 Vehicle Noise: 71.5 70.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 9,100 vehicles 9.30% 846 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -3.13 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.37 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.33 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.5 62.7 Medium Trucks: 59.6 58.4 52.1 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 58.9 49.9 Leq Night 56.6 50.5 51.2 Ldn 65.3 59.0 59.5 CNEL 65.9 59.2 59.6 67.0 62.2 70.7 71.2 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 66.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 72 77 65 dBA 154 166 60 dBA 332 357 55 dBA 716 770 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,014 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.35 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.59 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.54 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.8 65.3 63.5 Medium Trucks: 60.4 59.2 52.9 Heavy Trucks: 60.8 59.7 50.7 Leq Night 57.4 51.3 51.9 Ldn 66.1 59.8 60.3 CNEL 66.7 60.0 60.4 Vehicle Noise: 68.5 67.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.3 58.5 67.0 67.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 34 37 65 dBA 74 79 60 dBA 159 171 55 dBA 343 368 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,600 vehicles 9.30% 800 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.38 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.62 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.57 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.8 64.2 62.5 Medium Trucks: 59.4 58.2 51.8 Heavy Trucks: 59.8 58.7 497 Leq Night 56.4 50.3 50.9 Ldn 65.0 58.8 59.3 CNEL 65.6 59.0 59.4 59.3 67.8 68.3 Vehicle Noise: 67.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 39 42 65 dBA 83 89 60 dBA 55 dBA 179 386 193 415 163 66.1 63.0 58.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.8 67.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 d8A 33 35 65 dBA 71 76 60 dBA 55 dBA 153 330 165 354 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment. n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 15,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,423 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrer Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.88 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.12 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.07 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.3 66.7 65.0 Medium Trucks: 61.9 60.7 54.3 Heavy Trucks: 62.3 61.2 522 Leq Night 58.9 52.8 53.4 Ldn 67.5 61.3 61.8 CNEL 68.1 61.5 61.9 Vehicle Noise: 70.0 68.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,144 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.82 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.06 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.02 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.4 65.8 64.0 Medium Trucks: 60.9 59.8 53.4 Heavy Trucks: 61.4 60.3 512 Leq Night 58.0 51.8 52.5 Ldn 66.6 60.3 60.8 CNEL 67.2 60.5 61.0 65.5 60.7 69.3 69.8 Vehicle Noise: 69.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 48 52 65 dBA 104 112 60 dBA 225 242 55 dBA 484 520 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,400 vehicles 9.30% 502 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centedine Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.94 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.18 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.14 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.8 61.2 59.4 Medium Trucks: 56.5 55.3 49.0 Heavy Trucks: 57.4 56.3 472 Leq Night 53.3 47.4 48.5 Ldn 62.0 55.9 56.8 CNEL 62.6 56.1 57.0 Vehicle Noise: 64.6 63.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.6 64.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.8 68.3 68.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 42 45 65 dBA 90 97 60 dBA 194 209 55 dBA 419 450 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,228 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.52 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.76 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.71 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.6 62.8 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.5 52.2 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 59.0 50.0 Leq Night 56.7 50.6 51.2 Ldn 65.4 59.1 59.6 CNEL 66.0 59.3 59.7 60.0 55.3 63.9 64.3 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 20 21 65 dBA 43 46 60 dBA 55 dBA 93 199 99 214 164 66.4 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.4 58.6 67.1 67.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 89 95 60 dBA 55 dBA 191 412 205 442 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,088 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.04 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.28 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.24 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.6 64.0 62.3 Medium Trucks: 59.2 58.0 51.6 Heavy Trucks: 59.6 58.5 49.5 Leq Night 56.2 50.1 50.7 Ldn 64.8 58.6 59.1 CNEL 65.4 58.8 59.2 Vehicle Noise: 67.3 65.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 958 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -2.60 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.83 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.79 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.6 65.0 632 Medium Trucks: 60.2 59.0 52.6 Heavy Trucks: 60.6 59.5 50.5 Leq Night 57.2 51.1 51.7 Ldn 65.8 59.5 60.1 CNEL 66.4 59.8 60.2 62.8 58.1 66.6 67.1 Vehicle Noise: 68.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 38 41 65 dBA 82 88 60 dBA 176 189 55 dBA 380 408 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport 61. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,200 vehicles 9.30% 856 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I SIte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.09 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.32 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.28 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.5 62.7 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.5 52.1 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 59.0 50.0 Leq Night 56.7 50.6 51.2 Ldn 65.3 59.0 59.6 CNEL 65.9 59.3 59.7 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 66.9 63.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.0 67.6 68.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 37 40 65 dBA 80 86 60 dBA 173 186 55 dBA 372 400 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,000 vehicles 9.30% 837 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.18 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.42 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.38 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.0 64.4 62.7 Medium Trucks: 59.6 58.4 52.0 Heavy Trucks: 60.0 58.9 49.9 Leq Night 56.6 50.5 51.1 Ldn 65.2 58.9 59.5 CNEL 65.8 59.2 59.6 66.4 63.3 58.5 67.1 67.6 Vehicle Noise: 67.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 37 65 dBA 74 80 60 dBA 55 dBA 160 345 172 371 165 66.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.2 58.4 67.0 67.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 34 37 65 dBA 73 79 60 dBA 158 170 55 dBA 340 365 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,200 vehicles 9.30% 856 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.09 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.32 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.28 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.5 62.7 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.5 52.1 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 59.0 50.0 Leq Night 56.7 50.6 51.2 Ldn 65.3 59.0 59.6 CNEL 65.9 59.3 59.7 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 66.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 16,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,562 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -0.47 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.71 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.66 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.7 67.1 65.4 Medium Trucks: 62.3 61.1 54.7 Heavy Trucks: 62.7 61.6 52.6 Leq Night 59.3 53.2 53.8 Ldn 67.9 61.7 62.2 CNEL 68.5 61.9 62.3 63.3 58.5 67.1 67.6 Vehicle Noise: 70.4 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 37 65 dBA 74 80 60 dBA 160 172 55 dBA 345 371 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 15,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,460 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Was, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.76 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.00 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.96 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.4 66.8 65.1 Medium Trucks: 62.0 60.8 54.4 Heavy Trucks: 62.4 61.3 52.3 Leq Night 59.0 52.9 53.5 Ldn 67.6 61.4 61.9 CNEL 68.2 61.6 62.0 Vehicle Noise: 70.1 68.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.9 61.2 69.7 70.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 52 55 65 dBA 111 119 60 dBA 239 257 55 dBA 516 554 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,107 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Was, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.97 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.21 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.16 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.7 64.1 62.3 Medium Trucks: 59.3 58.1 51.7 Heavy Trucks: 59.7 58.6 49.5 Leq Night 56.3 50.2 50.8 Ldn 64.9 58.6 59.1 CNEL 65.5 58.9 59.3 65.6 60.9 69.4 69.9 Vehicle Noise: 67.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 49 53 65 dBA 106 114 60 dBA 229 246 55 dBA 493 529 166 66.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.9 58.1 66.7 67.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 38 41 65 dBA 83 89 60 dBA 178 192 55 dBA 384 413 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,172 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Berner Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.72 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.96 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.91 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.5 65.9 64.1 Medium Trucks: 61.0 59.9 53.5 Heavy Trucks: 61.5 60.4 51.3 Leq Night 58.1 51.9 526 Ldn 66.7 60.4 60.9 CNEL 67.3 60.6 61.1 Vehicle Noise: 69.2 67.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,153 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.79 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.03 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.98 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.4 65.8 64.0 Medium Trucks: 61.0 59.8 53.4 Heavy Trucks: 61.4 60.3 51.3 Leq Night 58.0 51.9 525 Ldn 66.6 60.3 60.9 CNEL 67.2 60.6 61.0 64.7 59.9 68.4 68.9 Vehicle Noise: 69.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA 92 99 60 dBA 198 212 55 dBA 426 457 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,700 vehicles 9.30% 716 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.86 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.10 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.05 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.3 63.7 62.0 Medium Trucks: 58.9 57.7 51.4 Heavy Trucks: 59.3 58.2 492 Leq Night 55.9 49.8 50.4 Ldn 64.5 58.3 58.8 CNEL 65.1 58.5 58.9 Vehicle Noise: 67.0 65.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.7 64.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.8 68.4 68.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 42 45 65 dBA 91 97 60 dBA 195 210 55 dBA 421 452 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,500 vehicles 9.30% 326 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -7.28 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.52 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.48 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 61.9 60.3 58.6 Medium Trucks: 55.5 Heavy Trucks: 55.9 54.3 47.9 54.8 45.8 Leq Night 52.5 46.4 47.0 Ldn 61.1 54.8 55.4 CNEL 61.7 55.1 55.5 62.5 57.8 66.3 66.8 Vehicle Noise: 63.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 31 33 65 dBA 66 71 60 dBA 55 dBA 142 306 153 329 167 62.2 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.1 54.3 62.9 63.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 18 19 65 dBA 39 42 60 dBA 84 90 55 dBA 181 195 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,000 vehicles 9.30% 465 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -5.28 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.51 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.47 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.4 60.8 59.1 Medium Trucks: 56.2 55.0 48.6 Heavy Trucks: 57.0 55.9 46.9 Leq Night 53.0 47.1 48.1 Ldn 61.6 55.6 56.5 CNEL 62.2 55.8 56.6 Vehicle Noise: 64.3 62.8 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 5,200 vehicles 9.30% 484 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Dlsfance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 68.46 -5.11 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.34 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.30 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.6 61.0 592 Medium Trucks: 56.4 55.2 48.8 Heavy Trucks: 57.2 56.1 47.1 Leq Night 53.2 47.3 48.3 Ldn 61.8 55.7 56.7 CNEL 62.4 56.0 56.8 59.7 55.0 63.5 64.0 Vehicle Noise: 64.4 63.0 70 dBA 65 dBA Ldn: 19 41 CNEL: 20 44 Wednesday, March 25, 2020 60 48A 88 94 55 dBA 189 203 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,600 vehicles 9.30% 335 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 59.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 59.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks: 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -7.16 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.40 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.35 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 61.0 59.4 57.6 Medium Trucks: 54.5 53.3 47.0 Heavy Trucks: 55.0 53.8 44.8 Leq Night 51.5 45.4 46.1 Ldn 60.2 53.9 54.4 CNEL 60.8 54.1 54.5 Vehicle Noise: 62.7 61.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.9 55.2 63.7 64.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 19 21 65 dBA 42 45 60 dBA 90 97 55 dBA 194 209 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,500 vehicles 9.30% 233 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -8.74 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -25.98 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -29.94 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 59.4 57.8 56.0 Medium Trucks: 52.9 51.8 45.4 Heavy Trucks: 53.4 52.3 432 Leq Night Ldn 50.0 43.8 44.5 58.6 52.3 52.8 CNEL 59.2 52.5 53.0 58.2 53.4 61.9 62.4 Vehicle Noise: 61.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 17 18 65 dBA 37 40 60 dBA 55 dBA 79 171 85 184 168 59.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 56.6 51.8 60.4 60.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 13 14 65 dBA 29 31 60 dBA 62 67 55 dBA 134 144 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC23 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 800 vehicles 9.30% 74 vehicles 40 mph 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 40.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 40.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -12.72 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -29.96 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -33.92 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 54.2 52.6 50.8 Medium Trucks: 48.2 47.0 40.6 Heavy Trucks: 49.5 48.4 39.3 Leq Night 44.8 39.1 40.6 Ldn 53.4 47.5 48.9 CNEL 54.0 47.8 49.1 Vehicle Noise: 56.2 54.8 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC23 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 5,400 vehicles 9.30% 502 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.94 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.18 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.14 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.8 61.2 594 Medium Trucks: 56.5 55.3 49.0 Heavy Trucks: 57.4 56.3 472 Leq Night 53.3 47.4 48.5 Ldn 62.0 55.9 56.8 CNEL 62.6 56.1 57.0 51.5 46.9 55.5 55.9 Vehicle Noise: 64.6 63.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 4 5 65 dBA 60 dBA 9 20 10 21 55 dBA 43 46 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAC23 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,800 vehicles 9.30% 446 vehicles 50 mph 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.91 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.15 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.11 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 61.9 60.3 58.5 Medium Trucks: 55.4 54.2 47.9 Heavy Trucks: 55.8 54.7 457 Leq Night 52.4 46.3 47.0 Ldn 61.1 54.8 55.3 CNEL 61.7 55.0 55.4 Vehicle Noise: 63.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.0 55.3 63.9 64.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 20 21 65 dBA 43 46 60 dBA 93 99 55 dBA 199 214 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP23 Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 33,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,153 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation.- Road levation:Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 2.16 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -15.07 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -19.03 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 72.2 70.6 68.9 Medium Trucks: 65.6 64.4 58.1 Heavy Trucks: 65.6 64.5 55.5 Leq Night 62.8 56.5 56.7 Ldn 71.4 65.0 65.1 CNEL 72.0 65.2 65.2 62.1 59.1 54.3 62.8 63.3 Vehicle Noise: 73.8 72.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 23 65 dBA 46 49 60 dBA 55 dBA 99 213 106 229 169 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 69.4 64.5 73.1 73.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 102 110 65 dBA 221 237 60 48,4 475 511 55 dBA 1,024 1,102 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 24,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,241 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 0.68 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.56 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.51 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.7 69.1 67.4 Medium Trucks: 64.1 62.9 56.6 Heavy Trucks: 64.2 63.1 54.0 Leq Night 61.3 55.0 55.3 Ldn 69.9 63.5 63.6 CNEL 70.5 63.7 63.7 Vehicle Noise: 72.3 70.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 20,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,860 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 -0.13 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -17.37 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -21.32 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 69.9 68.3 66.6 Medium Trucks: 63.3 62.1 55.8 Heavy Trucks: 63.4 62.2 53.2 Leq Night 60.5 54.2 54.5 Ldn 69.1 62.7 62.8 CNEL 69.7 62.9 62.9 67.9 63.0 71.6 72.1 Vehicle Noise: 71.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 82 88 65 dBA 176 189 60 dBA 379 407 55 dBA 816 878 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,200 vehicles 9.30% 856 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.09 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.32 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.28 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.5 62.7 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.5 52.1 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 59.0 50.0 Leq Night 56.7 50.6 51.2 Ldn 65.3 59.0 59.6 CNEL 65.9 59.3 59.7 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 70.0 67.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.2 70.8 71.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 72 78 65 dBA 155 167 60 dBA 334 360 55 dBA 721 775 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,ACP23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,023 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.31 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.55 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.50 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.9 65.3 63.5 Medium Trucks: 60.5 59.3 52.9 Heavy Trucks: 60.9 59.8 507 Leq Night 57.5 51.4 520 Ldn 66.1 59.8 60.3 CNEL 66.7 60.1 60.5 66.4 63.3 58.5 67.1 67.6 Vehicle Noise: 68.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 37 65 dBA 74 80 60 dBA 55 dBA 160 345 172 371 170 67.1 64.1 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.3 67.9 68.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 39 42 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA 84 180 389 90 194 418 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,900 vehicles 9.30% 828 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centedine Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.23 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.47 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.42 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 66.0 64.4 62.6 Medium Trucks: 59.5 58.3 52.0 Heavy Trucks: 60.0 58.9 49.8 Leq Night 56.6 50.4 51.1 Ldn 65.2 58.9 59.4 CNEL 65.8 59.1 59.5 Vehicle Noise: 67.7 66.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport 61. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 16,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,488 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BanierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.68 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.92 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.88 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.5 66.9 65.2 Medium Trucks: 62.1 60.9 54.5 Heavy Trucks: 62.5 61.4 52.4 Leq Night 59.1 53.0 53.6 Ldn 67.7 61.4 62.0 CNEL I 68.3 61.7 62.1 63.2 58.4 66.9 67.4 Vehicle Noise: 70.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 34 36 65 dBA 73 78 60 dBA 157 168 55 dBA 338 363 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,237 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.49 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.72 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.68 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 67.7 66.1 64.3 Medium Trucks: 61.3 60.1 53.7 Heavy Trucks: 61.7 60.6 51.6 Leq Night 58.3 52.2 52.8 Ldn 66.9 60.6 61.2 CNEL 67.5 60.9 61.3 Vehicle Noise: 69.4 68.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 68.8 65.7 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.9 69.5 70.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 50 54 65 dBA 108 116 60 dBA 232 249 55 dBA 499 536 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,800 vehicles 9.30% 539 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.63 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.87 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.83 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 63.1 61.5 597 Medium Trucks: 56.8 55.6 49.3 Heavy Trucks: 57.7 56.6 47.5 Leq Night 53.7 477 48.8 Ldn 62.3 56.2 57.1 CNEL 62.9 56.4 57.3 64.9 60.1 68.7 69.2 Vehicle Noise: 64.9 63.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 44 47 65 dBA 95 102 60 dBA 205 220 55 dBA 441 474 171 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.3 55.7 64.2 64.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 22 65 dBA 45 48 60 dBA 97 104 55 dBA 209 224 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,ACP23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,237 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Berner Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.49 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.72 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.68 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.2 64.6 62.8 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.6 52.2 Heavy Trucks: 60.2 59.1 50.0 Leq Night 56.8 50.6 51.3 Ldn 65.4 59.1 59.6 CNEL 66.0 59.3 59.8 Vehicle Noise: 67.9 66.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,097 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten I Autos: 70.20 -2.00 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.24 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.20 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.7 64.1 62.3 Medium Trucks: 59.2 58.0 51.7 Heavy Trucks: 59.6 58.5 49.5 Leq Night 56.3 50.1 50.8 Ldn 64.9 58.6 59.1 CNEL 65.5 58.8 59.2 63.4 58.6 67.2 67.6 Vehicle Noise: 67.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 89 96 60 dBA 192 206 55 dBA 414 444 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,ACP23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 967 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.55 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.79 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.75 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.6 65.0 63.3 Medium Trucks: 60.2 59.0 52.7 Heavy Trucks: 60.6 59.5 50.5 Leq Night 57.2 51.1 51.7 Ldn 65.8 59.6 60.1 CNEL 66.5 59.8 60.2 Vehicle Noise: 68.3 66.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.9 62.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.1 66.6 67.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 38 41 65 dBA 82 88 60 dBA 177 190 55 dBA 382 410 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,ACP23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,300 vehicles 9.30% 865 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.04 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.28 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.23 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.6 62.8 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.5 52.2 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 59.0 50.0 Leq Night 56.7 50.6 51.3 Ldn 65.4 59.1 59.6 CNEL 66.0 59.3 59.7 63.8 59.1 67.6 68.1 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA I 37 40 65 dBA 81 87 60 48,4 174 187 55 dBA 374 402 172 66.4 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.4 58.6 67.1 67.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 37 65 dBA 75 80 60 dBA 161 173 55 dBA 348 373 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,ACP23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,300 vehicles 9.30% 865 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.04 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.28 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.23 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.6 62.8 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.5 52.2 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 59.0 50.0 Leq Night 56.7 50.6 51.3 Ldn 65.4 59.1 59.6 CNEL 66.0 59.3 59.7 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 66.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 9,200 vehicles 9.30% 856 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -3.09 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.32 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.28 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.5 62.7 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.5 52.1 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 59.0 50.0 Leq Night 56.7 50.6 51.2 Ldn 65.3 59.0 59.6 CNEL 65.9 59.3 59.7 63.4 58.6 67.1 67.6 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 66.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 37 65 dBA 75 80 60 dBA 161 173 55 dBA 348 373 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 16,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,572 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.44 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.68 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.64 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.7 67.2 65.4 Medium Trucks: 62.3 61.1 54.8 Heavy Trucks: 62.7 61.6 52.6 Leq Night 59.3 53.2 53.9 Ldn 68.0 61.7 62.2 CNEL 68.6 61.9 62.3 Vehicle Noise: 70.4 69.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.3 58.5 67.1 67.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 37 65 dBA 74 80 60 dBA 160 172 55 dBA 345 371 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,ACP23 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 15,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,460 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.76 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.00 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.96 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.4 66.8 65.1 Medium Trucks: 62.0 60.8 54.4 Heavy Trucks: 62.4 61.3 52.3 Leq Night 59.0 52.9 53.5 Ldn 67.6 61.4 61.9 CNEL 68.2 61.6 62.0 66.0 61.2 69.7 70.2 Vehicle Noise: 70.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 52 56 65 dBA 112 120 60 48,4 240 258 55 dBA 518 556 173 68.7 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.6 60.9 69.4 69.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 49 53 65 dBA 106 114 60 dBA 55 dBA 229 493 246 529 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,ACP23 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,107 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.97 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.21 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.16 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.7 64.1 62.3 Medium Trucks: 59.3 58.1 51.7 Heavy Trucks: 59.7 58.6 49.5 Leq Night 56.3 50.2 50.8 Ldn 64.9 58.6 59.1 CNEL 65.5 58.9 59.3 Vehicle Noise: 67.4 66.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,ACP23 Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,181 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.69 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.92 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.88 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.5 65.9 64.1 Medium Trucks: 61.1 59.9 53.5 Heavy Trucks: 61.5 60.4 51.4 Leq Night 58.1 52.0 52.6 Ldn 66.7 60.4 61.0 CNEL 67.3 60.7 61.1 62.9 58.1 66.7 67.1 Vehicle Noise: 69.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 38 41 65 dBA 83 89 60 dBA 178 192 55 dBA 384 413 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,172 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrer:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.72 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.96 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.91 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.5 65.9 64.1 Medium Trucks: 61.0 59.9 53.5 Heavy Trucks: 61.5 60.4 51.3 Leq Night 58.1 51.9 52.6 Ldn 66.7 60.4 60.9 CNEL 67.3 60.6 61.1 Vehicle Noise: 69.2 67.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.8 64.7 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.9 68.5 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA 92 99 60 dBA 199 213 55 dBA 428 460 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,ACP23 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,800 vehicles 9.30% 725 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.80 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.04 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.00 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.4 63.8 62.0 Medium Trucks: 59.0 57.8 51.4 Heavy Trucks: 59.4 58.3 49.2 Leq Night 56.0 49.9 50.5 Ldn 64.6 58.3 58.8 CNEL 65.2 58.6 59.0 64.7 59.9 68.4 68.9 Vehicle Noise: 67.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA 92 99 60 dBA 55 dBA 198 426 212 457 174 65.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.6 57.8 66.4 66.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 31 33 65 dBA 67 72 60 dBA 143 154 55 dBA 309 332 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP23 Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,600 vehicles 9.30% 335 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -7.16 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.40 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.35 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 62.0 60.4 587 Medium Trucks: 55.6 54.4 48.1 Heavy Trucks: 56.0 54.9 45.9 Leq Night 52.6 46.5 47.1 Ldn 61.2 55.0 55.5 CNEL 61.8 55.2 55.6 Vehicle Noise: 63.7 62.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP23 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 5,500 vehicles 9.30% 512 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.86 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -22.10 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -26.06 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 62.8 61.2 59.5 Medium Trucks: 56.6 55.4 49.1 Heavy Trucks: 57.5 56.3 47.3 Leq Night 53.4 47.5 48.6 Ldn 62.0 56.0 56.9 CNEL 62.7 56.2 57.0 59.2 54.5 63.0 63.5 Vehicle Noise: 64.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA I 65 dBA 18 40 20 43 60 dBA 86 92 55 dBA 185 198 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP23 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,800 vehicles 9.30% 539 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 51.0 feet Centedine Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.63 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.87 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.83 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 63.1 61.5 597 Medium Trucks: 56.8 55.6 49.3 Heavy Trucks: 57.7 56.6 47.5 Leq Night 53.7 47.7 48.8 Ldn 62.3 56.2 57.1 CNEL 62.9 56.4 57.3 Vehicle Noise: 64.9 63.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.2 60.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 55.4 64.0 64.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 20 22 65 dBA 43 47 60 dBA 94 101 55 dBA 202 217 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP23 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,800 vehicles 9.30% 353 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.93 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.16 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.12 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 61.2 59.6 57.8 Medium Trucks: 54.8 53.6 47.2 Heavy Trucks: 55.2 54.1 45.0 Leq Night 51.8 45.7 46.3 Ldn 60.4 54.1 54.6 CNEL 61.0 54.4 54.8 60.3 55.7 64.2 64.6 Vehicle Noise: 62.9 61.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 22 65 dBA 45 48 60 dBA I 55 dBA 97 209 104 224 175 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.4 53.6 62.2 62,6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 18 19 65 dBA 38 41 60 dBA 82 88 55 dBA 177 191 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,700 vehicles 9.30% 251 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -8.41 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -25.65 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -29.60 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 59.7 58.1 56.4 Medium Trucks: 53.3 52.1 45.7 Heavy Trucks: 53.7 52.6 43.6 Leq Night Ldn 50.3 442 44.8 58.9 52.6 53.2 CNEL 59.5 52.9 53.3 Vehicle Noise: 61.4 60.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 1,000 vehicles 9.30% 93 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 40.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 40.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 66.51 -11.75 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -28.99 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -32.95 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 55.1 53.5 51.8 Medium Trucks: 49.1 47.9 41.6 Heavy Trucks: 50.5 49.4 40.3 Leq Night 45.7 40.0 41.6 Ldn 54.4 48.5 49.9 CNEL 55.0 48.7 50.0 56.9 52.1 60.7 61.2 Vehicle Noise: 57.2 55.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 14 15 65 dBA 30 33 60 dBA 66 70 55 dBA 141 152 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,900 vehicles 9.30% 549 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.56 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.80 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.75 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.1 61.6 59.8 Medium Trucks: 56.9 55.7 49.4 Heavy Trucks: 57.8 56.7 47.6 Leq Night 53.7 47.8 48.8 Ldn 62.4 56.3 57.2 CNEL 63.0 56.5 57.3 Vehicle Noise: 65.0 63.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 52.5 47.9 56.4 56.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 dBA 60 dBA 5 11 23 5 12 25 55 dBA 50 53 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.ACP23 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,100 vehicles 9.30% 474 vehicles 50 mph 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculation VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.65 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.89 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.84 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.1 60.5 58.8 Medium Trucks: 55.7 54.5 48.1 Heavy Trucks: 56.1 55.0 46.0 Leq Night 52.7 46.6 472 Ldn 61.3 55.1 55.6 CNEL 61.9 55.3 55.7 60.4 55.7 64.3 64.7 Vehicle Noise: 63.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 23 65 dBA 46 49 60 dBA 55 dBA 98 212 105 227 176 62.4 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.3 54.5 63.1 63.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 22 24 65 dBA 48 51 60 dBA 103 111 55 dBA 222 238 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC26 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 36,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,395 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Berner Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 2.49 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -14.75 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -18.71 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 72.5 70.9 69.2 Medium Trucks: 65.9 64.7 58.4 Heavy Trucks: 66.0 64.9 55.8 Leq Night 63.1 56.8 57.1 Ldn 71.7 65.3 65.4 CNEL 72.3 65.5 65.6 Vehicle Noise: 74.1 72.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC26 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 25,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,399 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten I Berm Alton I Autos: 71.78 0.98 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.26 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.22 -0.52 -1.20 -5.3/ 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 71.0 69.4 67.7 Medium Trucks: 64.4 63.2 56.9 Heavy Trucks: 64.5 63.4 54.3 Leq Night I Ldn 61.6 55.3 55.6 70.2 63.8 63.9 CNEL 70.8 64.0 64.0 69.7 64.8 73.4 73.9 Vehicle Noise: 72.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 108 116 65 dBA 232 249 60 dBA 499 537 55 dBA 1,076 1,158 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAC26 Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 21,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,018 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 0.23 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -17.01 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.97 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 70.3 68.7 66.9 Medium Trucks: 63.7 62.5 56.1 Heavy Trucks: 63.7 62.6 53.6 Leq Night 60.9 54.6 54.8 Ldn 69.5 63.0 63.2 CNEL 70.1 63.3 63.3 Vehicle Noise: 71.8 71.2 68.2 63.3 71.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 72.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 85 92 65 dBA 184 198 60 dBA 396 426 55 dBA 854 919 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,004 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.39 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.63 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.58 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 66.8 65.2 63.4 Medium Trucks: 60.4 59.2 52.8 Heavy Trucks: 60.8 59.7 507 Leq Night 57.4 51.3 51.9 Ldn 66.0 59.7 60.3 CNEL 66.6 60.0 60.4 70.4 67.4 62.6 71.1 71.6 Vehicle Noise: 68.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 76 82 65 dBA 164 176 60 dBA 55 dBA 353 761 380 818 177 67.1 64.0 59.2 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.8 68.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 38 41 65 dBA 83 89 60 dBA 178 191 55 dBA 384 413 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,237 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.49 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.72 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.68 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.7 66.1 64.3 Medium Trucks: 61.3 60.1 53.7 Heavy Trucks: 61.7 60.6 51.6 Leq Night 58.3 52.2 52.8 Ldn 66.9 60.6 61.2 CNEL 67.5 60.9 61.3 Vehicle Noise: 69.4 68.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 967 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Dlsfance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.55 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.79 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.75 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.6 65.0 63.3 Medium Trucks: 60.2 59.0 52.7 Heavy Trucks: 60.6 59.5 50.5 Leq Night 57.2 51.1 51.7 Ldn 65.8 59.6 60.1 CNEL 66.5 59.8 60.2 64.9 60.1 68.7 69.2 Vehicle Noise: 68.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 44 47 65 dBA 95 102 60 dBA 205 220 55 dBA 441 474 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport 81. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 18,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,693 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bonn Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.12 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.36 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.32 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 69.1 67.5 65.7 Medium Trucks: 62.6 61.5 55.1 Heavy Trucks: 63.1 62.0 52.9 Leq Night 59.7 53.5 54.2 Ldn 68.3 62.0 62.5 CNEL 68.9 62.2 62.7 Vehicle Noise: 70.8 69.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.9 63.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.1 67.6 68.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 37 40 65 dBA 81 87 60 dBA 174 187 55 dBA 374 402 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,330 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation.- Road levation:Road Elevation.- Road levation:Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.17 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.41 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.36 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.0 66.4 647 Medium Trucks: 61.6 60.4 54.0 Heavy Trucks: 62.0 60.9 51.9 Leq Night 58.6 52.5 53.1 Ldn 67.2 61.0 61.5 CNEL 67.8 61.2 61.6 66.3 61.5 70.0 70.5 Vehicle Noise: 69.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 54 58 65 dBA 117 126 60 dBA 252 271 55 dBA 544 584 178 68.3 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.2 60.5 69.0 69.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 46 50 65 dBA 100 107 60 dBA 215 231 55 dBA 463 497 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,600 vehicles 9.30% 614 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Dlsfance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.07 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.31 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.26 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.6 62.0 603 Medium Trucks: 57.4 56.2 49.8 Heavy Trucks: 58.2 57.1 48.1 Leq Night 54.2 48.3 49.4 Ldn 62.8 56.8 57.7 CNEL 63.4 57.0 57.8 Vehicle Noise: 65.5 64.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,283 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.32 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.56 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.52 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.3 64.8 63.0 Medium Trucks: 59.9 58.7 52.4 Heavy Trucks: 60.3 59.2 50.2 Leq Night 56.9 50.8 51.4 Ldn 65.6 59.3 59.8 CNEL 66.2 59.5 59.9 60.9 56.2 64.8 65.2 Vehicle Noise: 68.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 23 24 65 dBA 49 53 60 dBA 106 113 55 dBA 228 245 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,218 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.55 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.79 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.75 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.5 62.8 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.5 52.1 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 59.0 50.0 Leq Night 56.7 50.6 51.2 Ldn 65.3 59.0 59.6 CNEL 65.9 59.3 59.7 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 66.6 63.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.8 67.3 67.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 42 46 65 dBA 91 98 60 dBA 197 211 55 dBA 424 455 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,200 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.62 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.86 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.81 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.6 66.0 642 Medium Trucks: 61.2 60.0 53.6 Heavy Trucks: 61.6 60.5 51.4 Leq Night 58.2 52.1 527 Ldn 66.8 60.5 61.0 CNEL 67.4 60.7 61.2 66.4 63.3 58.5 67.1 67.6 Vehicle Noise: 69.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 88 95 60 dBA 55 dBA 190 409 204 440 179 67.8 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.8 60.0 68.6 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA L 60 dBA 93 201 100 216 55 dBA 432 464 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,AC26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,172 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.72 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.96 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.91 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.5 65.9 64.1 Medium Trucks: 61.0 59.9 53.5 Heavy Trucks: 61.5 60.4 51.3 Leq Night 58.1 51.9 52.6 Ldn 66.7 60.4 60.9 CNEL 67.3 60.6 61.1 Vehicle Noise: 69.2 67.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,116 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -1.93 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.17 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.13 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.3 65.7 63.9 Medium Trucks: 60.8 59.6 53.3 Heavy Trucks: 61.3 60.1 51.1 Leq Night 57.8 51.7 52.4 Ldn 66.5 60.2 60.7 CNEL 67.1 60.4 60.8 64.7 59.9 68.4 68.9 Vehicle Noise: 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA 92 99 60 dBA 198 212 55 dBA 426 457 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,AC26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,172 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.72 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.96 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.91 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.5 65.9 64.1 Medium Trucks: 61.0 59.9 53.5 Heavy Trucks: 61.5 60.4 51.3 Leq Night 58.1 51.9 52.6 Ldn 66.7 60.4 60.9 CNEL 67.3 60.6 61.1 Vehicle Noise: 69.2 67.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.5 64.5 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.7 68.2 68.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 89 95 60 dBA 191 205 55 dBA 412 443 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,AC26 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,581 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.42 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.66 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.61 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.8 67.2 65.4 Medium Trucks: 62.3 61.2 54.8 Heavy Trucks: 62.8 61.7 52.6 Leq Night 59.4 53.3 53.9 Ldn 68.0 61.7 62.2 CNEL 68.6 61.9 62.4 64.7 59.9 68.4 68.9 Vehicle Noise: 70.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA 92 99 60 dBA 55 dBA 198 426 212 457 180 69.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.0 61.2 69.7 70.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 52 56 65 dBA 112 120 L 60 dBA 241 259 55 dBA 520 558 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC26 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,618 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.32 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.56 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.51 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.9 67.3 65.5 Medium Trucks: 62.5 61.3 54.9 Heavy Trucks: 62.9 61.8 52.7 Leq Night 59.5 53.4 54.0 Ldn 68.1 61.8 62.3 CNEL 68.7 62.0 62.5 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 69.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC26 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,237 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -1.49 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.72 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.68 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.2 64.6 62.8 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.6 52.2 Heavy Trucks: 60.2 59.1 50.0 Leq Night 56.8 50.6 51.3 Ldn 65.4 59.1 59.6 CNEL 66.0 59.3 59.8 66.1 61.3 69.9 70.3 Vehicle Noise: 67.9 66.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 114 122 60 dBA 245 263 55 dBA 528 567 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC26 Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,321 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.20 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.44 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.40 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.0 66.4 64.6 Medium Trucks: 61.6 60.4 Heavy Trucks: 62.0 60.9 54.0 51.8 Leq Night 58.6 52.5 53.1 Ldn 67.2 60.9 61.4 CNEL 67.8 61.2 61.6 Vehicle Noise: 69.7 68.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.4 58.6 67.2 67.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 89 96 60 dBA 192 206 55 dBA 414 444 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,AC26 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,367 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.05 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.29 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.24 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.1 66.6 64.8 Medium Trucks: 61.7 60.5 54.2 Heavy Trucks: 62.1 61.0 52.0 Leq Night 58.7 52.6 53.2 Ldn 67.4 61.1 61.6 CNEL 68.0 61.3 61.7 65.2 60.4 69.0 69.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA I 46 50 65 dBA 99 107 60 dBA 55 dBA 214 461 230 495 181 68.4 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.4 60.6 69.1 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 47 51 65 dBA 102 109 60 dBA 219 235 55 dBA 472 507 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC26 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,300 vehicles 9.30% 865 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.04 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.28 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.23 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.6 62.8 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.5 52.2 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 59.0 50.0 Leq Night 56.7 50.6 51.3 Ldn 65.4 59.1 59.6 CNEL 66.0 59.3 59.7 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 66.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC26 Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 4,400 vehicles 9.30% 409 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.29 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.53 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.48 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.9 61.3 59.5 Medium Trucks: 56.5 55.3 48.9 Heavy Trucks: 56.9 55.8 46.8 Leq Night 53.5 47.4 48.0 Ldn 62.1 55.8 56.4 CNEL 62.7 56.1 56.5 63.4 58.6 67.1 67.6 Vehicle Noise: 64.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 37 65 dBA 75 80 60 dBA 161 173 55 dBA 348 373 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC26 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,700 vehicles 9.30% 530 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.71 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.95 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.90 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.0 61.4 59.6 Medium Trucks: 56.8 55.6 49.2 Heavy Trucks: 57.6 56.5 47.5 Leq Night 53.6 47.7 48.7 Ldn 62.2 56.1 57.1 CNEL 62.8 56.4 57.2 Vehicle Noise: 64.8 63.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.2 60.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 55.3 63.9 64.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 23 65 dBA 45 49 60 dBA 98 105 55 dBA 211 227 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E,AC26 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,900 vehicles 9.30% 549 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation.- Road levation:Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.56 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.80 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.75 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.1 61.6 59.8 Medium Trucks: 56.9 55.7 49.4 Heavy Trucks: 57.8 56.7 47.6 Leq Night 53.7 47.8 48.9 Ldn 62.4 56.3 57.2 CNEL 63.0 56.5 57.3 60.2 55.6 64.1 64.6 Vehicle Noise: 65.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 22 65 dBA 45 48 60 dBA 55 dBA 96 207 103 222 182 63.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.4 55.7 64.3 64.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 23 65 d8A 46 49 60 dBA 55 dBA 98 212 105 227 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC26 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,900 vehicles 9.30% 456 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.82 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.06 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.02 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.3 60.7 58.9 Medium Trucks: 55.9 54.7 48.3 Heavy Trucks: 56.3 55.2 46.1 Leq Night 52.9 46.8 47.4 Ldn 61.5 55.2 55.8 CNEL 62.1 55.5 55.9 Vehicle Noise: 64.0 62.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC26 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 3,300 vehicles 9.30% 307 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -7.54 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.78 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.73 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 60.6 59.0 572 Medium Trucks: 54.2 53.0 46.6 Heavy Trucks: 54.6 53.5 44.4 Leq Night Ldn 51.2 45.1 45.7 59.8 53.5 54.0 CNEL 60.4 53.7 54.2 59.5 54.7 63.3 63.7 Vehicle Noise: 62.3 60.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 23 65 dBA 45 49 60 dBA 98 105 55 dBA 210 226 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC26 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 1,100 vehicles 9.30% 102 vehicles 40 mph 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 40.0 feet 40.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks: 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -11.34 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -28.58 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -32.53 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 55.5 54.0 522 Medium Trucks: 49.6 48.4 42.0 Heavy Trucks: 50.9 49.8 407 Leq Night 46.1 40.5 420 Ldn 54.8 48.9 50.3 CNEL 55.4 49.1 50.5 Vehicle Noise: 57.6 56.2 52.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 48.3 56.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.8 53.0 61.6 62.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 16 17 65 dBA 35 37 60 dBA 75 81 55 dBA 161 173 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: E.AC26 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,900 vehicles 9.30% 642 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -3.88 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.12 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.07 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.8 62.2 60.5 Medium Trucks: 57.6 56.4 50.0 Heavy Trucks: 58.4 57.3 48.3 Leq Night 54.4 48.5 49.5 Ldn 63.0 57.0 57.9 CNEL 63.6 57.2 58.0 57.3 Vehicle Noise: 65.7 64.2 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 5 6 65 dBA 11 12 60 dBA 55 dBA 25 53 26 57 183 61.1 56.4 64.9 65.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 23 25 65 dBA 51 54 60 dBA 55 dBA 109 235 117 252 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,700 vehicles 9.30% 530 vehicles 50 mph 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.17 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.40 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.36 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.6 61.0 59.2 Medium Trucks: 56.2 55.0 48.6 Heavy Trucks: 56.6 55.5 46.5 Leq Night 53.2 47.1 477 Ldn 61.8 55.5 56.1 CNEL 62.4 55.8 56.2 Vehicle Noise: 64.3 62.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 37,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,441 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 71.78 2.54 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -14.69 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -18.65 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 72.6 71.0 692 Medium Trucks: 66.0 64.8 58.4 Heavy Trucks: 66.0 64.9 55.9 Leq Night 63.2 56.9 57.1 Ldn 71.8 65.3 65.5 CNEL 72.4 65.6 65.6 59.8 55.0 63.6 64.0 Vehicle Noise: 74.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 24 26 65 dBA 51 55 60 dBA 111 119 55 dBA 239 257 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP26 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 26,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,465 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 1.09 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.14 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.10 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 71.1 69.5 67.8 Medium Trucks: 64.5 63.3 57.0 Heavy Trucks: 64.6 63.5 54.4 Leq Night 61.7 55.4 55.7 Ldn 70.4 63.9 64.0 CNEL 71.0 64.1 64.2 Vehicle Noise: 72.7 71.3 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 72.7 69.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.9 73.4 73.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 109 117 65 dBA 234 252 60 dBA 504 542 55 dBA 1,086 1,168 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP26 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 22,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,093 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 0.38 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.85 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.81 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.4 68.8 67.1 Medium Trucks: 63.8 62.6 56.3 Heavy Trucks: 63.9 62.8 53.7 Leq Night 61.0 54.7 55.0 Ldn 69.6 63.2 63.3 CNEL 70.2 63.4 63.5 68.3 63.4 72.0 72.5 Vehicle Noise: 72.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 87 94 65 dBA 187 201 60 dBA 55 dBA 403 869 434 935 184 70.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.6 62.7 71.3 71.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 78 84 65 dBA 168 181 60 dBA 55 dBA 362 779 389 838 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,051 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Ban-ier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.19 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.43 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.39 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 67.0 65.4 63.6 Medium Trucks: 60.6 59.4 53.0 Heavy Trucks: 61.0 59.9 50.9 Leq Night 57.6 51.5 52.1 Ldn 66.2 59.9 60.5 CNEL 66.8 60.2 60.6 Vehicle Noise: 68.7 67.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,302 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.26 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.50 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.46 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 67.9 66.3 64.6 Medium Trucks: 61.5 60.3 54.0 Heavy Trucks: 61.9 60.8 51.8 Leq Night 58.5 52.4 53.0 Ldn 67.1 60.9 61.4 CNEL I 67.7 61.1 61.5 64.2 59.4 68.0 68.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 40 43 65 dBA 85 92 60 dBA 184 197 55 dBA 396 425 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,088 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centedine Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.04 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.28 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.24 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 67.1 65.6 63.8 Medium Trucks: 60.7 59.5 53.2 Heavy Trucks: 61.1 60.0 51.0 Leq Night 577 51.6 52.3 Ldn 66.4 60.1 60.6 CNEL 67.0 60.3 60.7 Vehicle Noise: 68.8 67.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 68.2 65.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.4 68.9 69.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 46 49 65 dBA 98 106 60 dBA 212 228 55 dBA 457 490 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 20,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,925 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 0.44 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -16.80 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -20.76 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 69.6 68.0 66.3 Medium Trucks: 63.2 62.0 55.7 Heavy Trucks: 63.6 62.5 53.5 Leq Night 60.2 54.1 54.7 Ldn 68.8 62.6 63.1 CNEL 69.4 62.8 63.2 64.4 59.6 68.1 68.6 Vehicle Noise: 71.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 87 94 60 dBA 1 55 dBA 188 405 202 435 185 69.9 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.8 62.1 70.6 71.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 59 64 65 dBA 128 137 60 dBA 275 295 55 dBA 593 637 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,618 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Berner Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.32 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.56 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.51 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.9 67.3 65.5 Medium Trucks: 62.5 61.3 54.9 Heavy Trucks: 62.9 61.8 52.7 Leq Night 59.5 53.4 54.0 Ldn 68.1 61.8 62.3 CNEL 68.7 62.0 62.5 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 69.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 7,600 vehicles 9.30% 707 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -3.46 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -20.70 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -24.65 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.2 62.7 60.9 Medium Trucks: 58.0 56.8 50.5 Heavy Trucks: 58.9 57.8 48.7 Leq Night 54.8 48.9 50.0 Ldn 63.5 57.4 58.3 CNEL 64.1 57.6 58.4 66.1 61.3 69.9 70.3 Vehicle Noise: 66.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 114 122 60 dBA 245 263 55 dBA 528 567 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,330 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.17 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.41 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.36 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.5 64.9 63.1 Medium Trucks: 60.1 58.9 52.5 Heavy Trucks: 60.5 59.4 50.3 Leq Night 57.1 51.0 51.6 Ldn 65.7 59.4 59.9 CNEL 66.3 59.7 60.1 Vehicle Noise: 68.2 64.7 61.5 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 56.8 65.4 65.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 25 27 65 dBA 60 dBA 54 116 58 125 55 dBA 250 269 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,283 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.32 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.56 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.52 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.3 64.8 63.0 Medium Trucks: 59.9 58.7 52.4 Heavy Trucks: 60.3 59.2 50.2 Leq Night 56.9 50.8 51.4 Ldn 65.6 59.3 59.8 CNEL 66.2 59.5 59.9 66.8 63.7 58.9 67.5 67.9 Vehicle Noise: 68.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 47 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA 94 201 434 100 216 466 186 66.6 63.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.8 67.3 67.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 42 46 65 dBA 91 98 60 dBA 197 211 55 dBA 424 455 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,265 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.39 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.63 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.58 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.8 66.2 64.4 Medium Trucks: 61.4 60.2 53.8 Heavy Trucks: 61.8 60.7 517 Leq Night 58.4 523 529 Ldn 67.0 60.7 61.3 CNEL 67.6 61.0 61.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.5 68.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,237 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.49 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.72 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.68 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.7 66.1 64.3 Medium Trucks: 61.3 60.1 53.7 Heavy Trucks: 61.7 60.6 51.6 Leq Night 58.3 522 52.8 Ldn 66.9 60.6 61.2 CNEL 67.5 60.9 61.3 65.0 60.2 68.8 69.2 Vehicle Noise: 69.4 68.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 45 48 65 dBA 96 104 60 dBA 208 223 55 dBA 448 481 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,218 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.55 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.79 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.75 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.6 66.1 64.3 Medium Trucks: 61.2 60.0 53.7 Heavy Trucks: 61.6 60.5 51.5 Leq Night 58.2 52.1 527 Ldn CNEL 66.9 60.6 61.1 67.5 60.8 61.2 Vehicle Noise: 69.3 67.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.9 60.1 68.7 69.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 44 47 65 dBA 60 dBA 95 205 102 220 55 dBA 441 474 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,190 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.65 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.89 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.85 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.5 66.0 642 Medium Trucks: 61.1 59.9 53.6 Heavy Trucks: 61.5 60.4 51.4 Leq Night 58.1 52.0 52.6 Ldn 66.8 60.5 61.0 CNEL 67.4 60.7 61.1 64.9 60.1 68.6 69.1 Vehicle Noise: 69.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 44 47 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA 94 203 437 101 218 469 187 67.8 64.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.0 68.5 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA I 93 100 60 dBA 200 214 55 dBA 430 462 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,628 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.29 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.53 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.49 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.9 67.3 65.5 Medium Trucks: 62.5 61.3 54.9 Heavy Trucks: 62.9 61.8 52.8 Leq Night 59.5 53.4 54.0 Ldn 68.1 61.8 62.4 CNEL 68.7 62.1 62.5 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 69.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,637 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.27 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.51 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.46 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.9 67.3 65.6 Medium Trucks: 62.5 61.3 54.9 Heavy Trucks: 62.9 61.8 52.8 Leq Night 59.5 53.4 54.0 Ldn 68.1 61.9 62.4 CNEL I 68.7 62.1 62.5 66.1 61.3 69.9 70.3 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 114 123 60 dBA 246 284 55 dBA 530 569 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,256 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barriers 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.42 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.66 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.61 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 66.2 64.7 62.9 Medium Trucks: 59.8 58.6 52.3 Heavy Trucks: 60.2 59.1 50.1 Leq Night 56.8 50.7 51.3 Ldn CNEL 65.5 59.2 59.7 66.1 59.4 59.8 Vehicle Noise: 67.9 66.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 69.2 66.1 61.4 69.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 70.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 115 123 60 dBA 247 265 55 dBA 532 571 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,358 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation.- Road levation:Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.08 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.32 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.27 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.1 66.5 64.8 Medium Trucks: 61.7 60.5 54.1 Heavy Trucks: 62.1 61.0 52.0 Leq Night 58.7 52.6 53.2 Ldn 67.3 61.1 61.6 CNEL 67.9 61.3 61.7 63.5 58.7 67.2 67.7 Vehicle Noise: 69.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 42 45 65 dBA 90 97 60 dBA 55 dBA 194 418 208 449 188 68.4 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.3 60.5 69.1 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 47 50 65 dBA 101 109 60 dBA 218 234 55 dBA 470 504 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FACP26 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 15,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,442 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.82 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.06 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.01 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.4 66.8 65.0 Medium Trucks: 61.9 60.8 54.4 Heavy Trucks: 62.4 61.3 52.2 Leq Night 59.0 52.8 53.5 Ldn 67.6 61.3 61.8 CNEL 68.2 61.5 62.0 Vehicle Noise: 70.1 68.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 9,700 vehicles 9.30% 902 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.86 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.09 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.05 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.3 64.7 63.0 Medium Trucks: 59.9 58.7 52.4 Heavy Trucks: 60.3 59.2 50.2 Leq Night 56.9 50.8 51.4 Ldn 65.5 59.3 59.8 CNEL 66.2 59.5 59.9 65.6 60.8 69.3 69.8 Vehicle Noise: 68.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 49 52 65 dBA 105 113 60 dBA 227 244 55 dBA 489 525 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP26 Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,800 vehicles 9.30% 446 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrer:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.91 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.15 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.11 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.3 61.7 59.9 Medium Trucks: 56.9 55.7 49.3 Heavy Trucks: 57.3 56.2 47.1 Leq Night 53.9 47.8 48.4 Ldn 62.5 56.2 56.7 CNEL 63.1 56.5 56.9 Vehicle Noise: 65.0 63.5 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.6 63.5 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.8 67.3 67.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 36 38 65 dBA 77 83 60 dBA 166 178 55 dBA 357 384 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP26 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,200 vehicles 9.30% 577 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.34 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.58 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.54 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.4 61.8 60.0 Medium Trucks: 57.1 55.9 49.6 Heavy Trucks: 58.0 56.9 47.8 Leq Night 53.9 48.0 49.1 Ldn 62.6 56.5 57.4 CNEL 63.2 56.7 57.6 60.5 55.7 64.3 64.7 Vehicle Noise: 65.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 22 24 65 dBA 48 52 60 dBA 55 dBA 104 224 112 240 189 63.8 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.6 55.9 64.5 64.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 22 23 65 dBA 47 51 60 dBA 55 dBA 101 219 109 235 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FACP26 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,800 vehicles 9.30% 725 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -3.35 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -20.58 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -24.54 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 64.3 62.8 61.0 Medium Trucks: 58.1 56.9 50.6 Heavy Trucks: 58.0 57.9 48.8 Leq Night 54.9 49.0 50.1 Ldn 63.6 57.5 58.4 CNEL 64.2 57.7 58.6 Vehicle Noise: 66.2 64.8 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 5,700 vehicles 9.30% 530 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 59.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 59.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.17 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.40 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.36 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 62.9 61.4 59.6 Medium Trucks: 56.5 55.3 49.0 Heavy Trucks: 56.9 55.8 46.8 Leq Night 53.5 47.4 48.1 Ldn 62.2 55.9 56.4 CNEL I 62.8 56.1 56.5 61.6 56.9 65.5 65.9 Vehicle Noise: 64.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 25 27 65 dBA 55 59 60 dBA 118 127 55 dBA 255 273 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP26 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,900 vehicles 9.30% 363 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 59.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 59.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks: 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.81 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.05 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.01 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 61.3 59.7 58.0 Medium Trucks: 54.9 53.7 47.3 Heavy Trucks: 55.3 54.2 452 Leq Night 51.9 45.8 46.4 Ldn 60.5 54.2 54.8 CNEL 61.1 54.5 54.9 Vehicle Noise: 63.0 61.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.2 60.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 55.4 63.9 64.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 23 25 65 dBA 50 54 60 dBA 108 116 55 dBA 232 250 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PACP26 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 2,300 vehicles 9.30% 214 vehicles 40 mph 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 40.0 feet 40.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -8.14 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -25.38 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -29.33 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 58.8 57.2 55.4 Medium Trucks: 52.8 51.6 45.2 Heavy Trucks: 54.1 53.0 43.9 Leq Night 1 Ldn 49.3 43.7 45.2 58.0 52.1 53.5 CNEL 58.6 52.3 53.7 58.5 53.7 62.3 62.8 Vehicle Noise: 60.8 59.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 1 65 dBA 18 39 19 42 60 dBA 84 90 55 dBA 180 194 190 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 56.1 51.5 60.1 60.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 dBA 9 19 9 20 60 dBA 40 43 55 dBA 87 93 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,200 vehicles 9.30% 763 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -3.13 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -20.37 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -24.32 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.6 63.0 61.2 Medium Trucks: 58.3 57.2 50.8 Heavy Trucks: 58.2 58.1 49.0 Leq Night 55.2 49.2 50.3 Ldn 63.8 57.7 58.7 CNEL 64.4 57.9 58.8 Vehicle Noise: 66.4 65.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EACP26 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 6,400 vehicles 9.30% 595 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.66 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.90 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.86 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.1 61.5 59.8 Medium Trucks: 56.7 55.5 49.1 Heavy Trucks: 57.1 56.0 47.0 Leq Night 53.7 47.6 48.2 Ldn 62.3 56.0 56.6 CNEL 62.9 56.3 56.7 61.8 57.2 65.7 66.2 Vehicle Noise: 64.8 63.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 26 28 65 dBA 57 61 60 d8A 122 131 55 dBA 263 283 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 36,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,395 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 2.49 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -14.75 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -18.71 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 72.5 70.9 692 Medium Trucks: 65.9 64.7 58.4 Heavy Trucks: 66.0 64.9 55.8 Leq Night 63.1 56.8 57.1 Ldn 71.7 65.3 65.4 CNEL 72.3 65.5 65.6 Vehicle Noise: 74.1 72.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.3 55.5 64.1 64.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 26 28 65 dBA 56 60 60 48,4 120 129 55 dBA 258 277 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 25,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,399 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-08an): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 0.98 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.26 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.22 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 71.0 69.4 67.7 Medium Trucks: 64.4 63.2 56.9 Heavy Trucks: 64.5 63.4 54.3 Leq Night 61.6 55.3 55.6 Ldn 70.2 63.8 63.9 CNEL 70.8 64.0 64.0 69.7 64.8 73.4 73.9 Vehicle Noise: 72.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 108 116 65 dBA 232 249 60 dBA 55 dBA 499 1,076 537 1,158 191 71.2 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 68.2 63.3 71.9 72.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 85 92 65 dBA 184 198 60 d8A 396 426 55 dBA 854 919 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 21,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,018 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Berner Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 0.23 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -17.01 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.97 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.3 68.7 66.9 Medium Trucks: 63.7 62.5 56.1 Heavy Trucks: 63.7 62.6 53.6 Leq Night 60.9 54.6 54.8 Ldn 69.5 63.0 63.2 CNEL 70.1 63.3 63.3 Vehicle Noise: 71.8 70.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,004 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -2.39 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.63 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.58 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.8 65.2 63.4 Medium Trucks: 60.4 59.2 52.8 Heavy Trucks: 60.8 59.7 507 Leq Night 57.4 51.3 51.9 Ldn 66.0 59.7 60.3 CNEL 66.6 60.0 60.4 67.4 62.6 71.1 71.6 Vehicle Noise: 68.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 76 82 65 dBA 164 176 60 dBA 353 380 55 dBA 761 818 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,237 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.49 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.72 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.68 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.7 66.1 64.3 Medium Trucks: 61.3 60.1 53.7 Heavy Trucks: 61.7 60.6 51.6 Leq Night 58.3 52.2 52.8 Ldn CNEL 66.9 60.6 61.2 67.5 60.9 61.3 Vehicle Noise: 69.4 68.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.1 64.0 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 59.2 67.8 68.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 38 41 65 dBA 83 89 60 dBA 178 191 55 dBA 384 413 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 967 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.55 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.79 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.75 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.6 65.0 63.3 Medium Trucks: 60.2 59.0 52.7 Heavy Trucks: 60.6 59.5 50.5 Leq Night 57.2 51.1 51.7 Ldn 65.8 59.6 60.1 CNEL 66.5 59.8 60.2 64.9 60.1 68.7 69.2 Vehicle Noise: 68.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 44 47 65 dBA 95 102 60 dBA 205 220 55 dBA 441 474 192 66.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.8 59.1 67.6 68.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 37 40 65 dBA 81 87 60 dBA 174 187 55 dBA 374 402 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 18,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,693 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.12 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.36 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.32 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 69.1 67.5 65.7 Medium Trucks: 62.6 61.5 55.1 Heavy Trucks: 63.1 62.0 52.9 Leq Night 59.7 53.5 54.2 Ldn 68.3 62.0 62.5 CNEL I 68.9 62.2 62.7 Vehicle Noise: 70.8 69.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,330 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Dlsfance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.17 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.41 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.36 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.0 66.4 647 Medium Trucks: 61.6 60.4 54.0 Heavy Trucks: 62.0 60.9 51.9 Leq Night 58.6 52.5 53.1 Ldn 67.2 61.0 61.5 CNEL 67.8 61.2 61.6 66.3 61.5 70.0 70.5 Vehicle Noise: 69.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 54 58 65 dBA 117 126 60 dBA 252 271 55 dBA 544 584 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,600 vehicles 9.30% 614 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Bean Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.07 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.31 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.26 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 63.6 62.0 603 Medium Trucks: 57.4 56.2 49.8 Heavy Trucks: 58.2 57.1 48.1 Leq Night 54.2 48.3 49.4 Ldn 62.8 56.8 57.7 CNEL 63.4 57.0 57.8 Vehicle Noise: 65.5 64.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 68.3 65.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.5 69.0 69.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 46 50 65 dBA 100 107 60 dBA 215 231 55 dBA 463 497 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,283 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.32 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.56 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.52 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 66.3 64.8 63.0 Medium Trucks: 59.9 58.7 52.4 Heavy Trucks: 60.3 59.2 50.2 Leq Night 56.9 50.8 51.4 Ldn 65.6 59.3 59.8 CNEL 66.2 59.5 59.9 60.9 56.2 64.8 65.2 Vehicle Noise: 68.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 23 24 65 dBA 49 53 60 dBA 1 55 dBA 106 228 113 245 193 66.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.6 58.8 67.3 67.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 42 46 65 dBA 91 98 60 dBA 197 211 55 dBA 424 455 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,218 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.55 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.79 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.75 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.5 62.8 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.5 52.1 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 59.0 50.0 Leq Night 56.7 50.6 51.2 Ldn 65.3 59.0 59.6 CNEL 65.9 59.3 59.7 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 66.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,200 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -1.62 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.86 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.81 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.6 66.0 642 Medium Trucks: 61.2 60.0 53.6 Heavy Trucks: 61.6 60.5 51.4 Leq Night 58.2 52.1 527 Ldn 66.8 60.5 61.0 CNEL 67.4 60.7 61.2 63.3 58.5 67.1 67.6 Vehicle Noise: 69.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 88 95 60 dBA 190 204 55 dBA 409 440 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,172 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.72 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.96 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.91 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.5 65.9 64.1 Medium Trucks: 61.0 59.9 53.5 Heavy Trucks: 61.5 60.4 51.3 Leq Night 58.1 51.9 526 Ldn 66.7 60.4 60.9 CNEL 67.3 60.6 61.1 Vehicle Noise: 69.2 67.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.8 64.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.0 68.6 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA 93 100 60 dBA 201 216 55 dBA 432 464 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,116 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.93 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.17 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.13 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.3 65.7 63.9 Medium Trucks: 60.8 59.6 53.3 Heavy Trucks: 61.3 60.1 51.1 Leq Night 57.8 51.7 524 Ldn 66.5 60.2 60.7 CNEL 67.1 60.4 60.8 64.7 59.9 68.4 68.9 Vehicle Noise: 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA 92 99 60 dBA 55 dBA 198 426 212 457 194 67.5 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.5 59.7 68.2 68.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 89 95 60 dBA 55 dBA 191 412 205 443 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,172 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centedine Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Berner Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.72 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.96 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.91 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.5 65.9 64.1 Medium Trucks: 61.0 59.9 53.5 Heavy Trucks: 61.5 60.4 51.3 Leq Night 58.1 51.9 52.6 Ldn 66.7 60.4 60.9 CNEL 67.3 60.6 61.1 Vehicle Noise: 69.2 67.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,581 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -0.42 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.66 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.61 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.8 67.2 65.4 Medium Trucks: 62.3 61.2 54.8 Heavy Trucks: 62.8 61.7 52.6 Leq Night 59.4 53.3 53.9 Ldn 68.0 61.7 62.2 CNEL 68.6 61.9 62.4 64.7 59.9 68.4 68.9 Vehicle Noise: 70.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA 92 99 60 dBA 198 212 55 dBA 426 457 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,400 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,618 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.32 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.56 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.51 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.9 67.3 65.5 Medium Trucks: 62.5 61.3 54.9 Heavy Trucks: 62.9 61.8 527 Leq Night 59.5 53.4 54.0 Ldn 68.1 61.8 62.3 CNEL 68.7 62.0 62.5 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 69.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 69.0 66.0 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.2 69.7 70.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 52 56 65 dBA 112 120 60 dBA 241 259 55 dBA 520 558 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,237 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.49 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.72 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.68 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.2 64.6 62.8 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.6 52.2 Heavy Trucks: 60.2 59.1 50.0 Leq Night 56.8 50.6 51.3 Ldn 65.4 59.1 59.6 CNEL 66.0 59.3 59.8 66.1 61.3 69.9 70.3 Vehicle Noise: 67.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 114 122 60 dBA 55 dBA 245 528 263 567 195 66.4 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.4 58.6 67.2 67.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 89 96 60 dBA 192 206 55 dBA 414 444 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,321 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.20 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.44 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.40 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.0 66.4 64.6 Medium Trucks: 61.6 60.4 54.0 Heavy Trucks: 62.0 60.9 51.8 Leq Night 58.6 52.5 53.1 Ldn 67.2 60.9 61.4 CNEL 67.8 61.2 61.6 Vehicle Noise: 69.7 68.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,367 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -1.05 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.29 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.24 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.1 66.6 64.8 Medium Trucks: 61.7 60.5 54.2 Heavy Trucks: 62.1 61.0 52.0 Leq Night 58.7 52.6 53.2 Ldn 67.4 61.1 61.6 CNEL 68.0 61.3 61.7 65.2 60.4 69.0 69.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.8 68.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 46 50 65 dBA 99 107 60 d8A 214 230 55 dBA 461 495 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,300 vehicles 9.30% 865 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -3.04 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.28 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.23 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.1 64.6 62.8 Medium Trucks: 59.7 58.5 52.2 Heavy Trucks: 60.1 59.0 50.0 Leq Night 56.7 50.6 51.3 Ldn 65.4 59.1 59.6 CNEL 66.0 59.3 59.7 Vehicle Noise: 67.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.4 60.6 69.1 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 47 51 65 dBA 102 109 60 dBA 219 235 55 dBA 472 507 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,400 vehicles 9.30% 409 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.29 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.53 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.48 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.9 61.3 59.5 Medium Trucks: 56.5 55.3 48.9 Heavy Trucks: 56.9 55.8 46.8 Leq Night 53.5 47.4 48.0 Ldn 62.1 55.8 56.4 CNEL 62.7 56.1 56.5 66.4 63.4 58.6 67.1 67.6 Vehicle Noise: 64.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 37 65 dBA 75 80 60 dBA 55 dBA 161 348 173 373 196 63.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.1 55.3 63.9 64.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 23 65 dBA 45 49 60 dBA 55 dBA 98 211 105 227 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,700 vehicles 9.30% 530 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.71 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.95 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.90 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.0 61.4 59.6 Medium Trucks: 56.8 55.6 49.2 Heavy Trucks: 57.6 56.5 47.5 Leq Night 53.6 47.7 48.7 Ldn 62.2 56.1 57.1 CNEL 62.8 56.4 57.2 Vehicle Noise: 64.8 63.4 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 5,900 vehicles 9.30% 549 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Dlsfance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.56 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.80 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.75 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.1 61.6 59.8 Medium Trucks: 56.9 55.7 49.4 Heavy Trucks: 57.8 56.7 47.6 Leq Night 53.7 47.8 48.9 Ldn 62.4 56.3 57.2 CNEL 63.0 56.5 57.3 60.2 55.6 64.1 64.6 Vehicle Noise: 65.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 22 65 dBA 45 48 60 dBA 96 103 55 dBA 207 222 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,900 vehicles 9.30% 456 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Ban-ier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Banier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks: 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.82 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.06 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.02 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.3 60.7 58.9 Medium Trucks: 55.9 54.7 48.3 Heavy Trucks: 56.3 55.2 46.1 Leq Night 529 46.8 47.4 Ldn 61.5 55.2 55.8 CNEL 62.1 55.5 55.9 Vehicle Noise: 64.0 62.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.6 60.4 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 55.7 64.3 64.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 23 65 dBA 46 49 60 dBA 98 105 55 dBA 212 227 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 3,300 vehicles 9.30% 307 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -7.54 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -24.78 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -28.73 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 60.6 59.0 572 Medium Trucks: 54.2 53.0 46.6 Heavy Trucks: 54.6 53.5 44.4 Leq Night Ldn 51.2 45.1 45.7 59.8 53.5 54.0 CNEL 60.4 53.7 54.2 59.5 54.7 63.3 63.7 Vehicle Noise: 62.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 21 23 65 dBA 45 49 60 dBA 55 dBA 98 210 105 226 197 60.8 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.8 53.0 61.6 62.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 16 17 65 dBA 35 37 60 dBA 75 81 55 dBA 161 173 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 1,100 vehicles 9.30% 102 vehicles 40 mph 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 40.0 feet 40.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -11.34 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -28.58 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -32.53 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 55.5 54.0 522 Medium Trucks: 49.6 48.4 42.0 Heavy Trucks: 50.9 49.8 407 Leq Night 46.1 40.5 420 Ldn 54.8 48.9 50.3 CNEL 55.4 49.1 50.5 Vehicle Noise: 57.6 56.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 52.9 48.3 56.9 57.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 5 6 65 dBA 11 12 60 dBA 25 26 55 dBA 53 57 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,700 vehicles 9.30% 530 vehicles 50 mph 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.17 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.40 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.36 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 62.6 61.0 592 Medium Trucks: 56.2 55.0 48.6 Heavy Trucks: 56.6 55.5 46.5 Leq Night 53.2 47.1 477 Ldn 61.8 55.5 56.1 CNEL 62.4 55.8 56.2 Vehicle Noise: 64.3 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAC26SE Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 6,900 vehicles 9.30% 642 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Dlsfance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -3.88 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.12 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.07 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.8 62.2 60.5 Medium Trucks: 57.6 56.4 50.0 Heavy Trucks: 58.4 57.3 48.3 Leq Night 54.4 48.5 49.5 Ldn 63.0 57.0 57.9 CNEL 63.6 57.2 58.0 Vehicle Noise: 65.7 64.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.1 56.4 64.9 65.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 23 25 65 dBA 51 54 60 dBA 109 117 55 dBA 235 252 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 37,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,441 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 2.54 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -14.69 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -18.65 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 72.6 71.0 692 Medium Trucks: 66.0 64.8 58.4 Heavy Trucks: 66.0 64.9 55.9 Leq Night 63.2 56.9 57.1 Ldn 71.8 65.3 65.5 CNEL 72.4 65.6 65.6 62.9 59.8 55.0 63.6 64.0 Vehicle Noise: 74.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 24 26 65 dBA 51 55 60 dBA 55 dBA 111 239 119 257 198 72.7 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 69.8 64.9 73.4 73.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 109 117 65 dBA 234 252 60 dBA 504 542 55 dBA 1,086 1,168 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 26,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,465 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 1.09 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.14 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.10 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 71.1 69.5 67.8 Medium Trucks: 64.5 63.3 57.0 Heavy Trucks: 64.6 63.5 54.4 Leq Night 61.7 55.4 55.7 Ldn 70.4 63.9 64.0 CNEL 71.0 64.1 64.2 Vehicle Noise: 72.7 71.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 22,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,102 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 71.78 0.40 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -16.83 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -20.79 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.4 68.9 67.1 Medium Trucks: 63.8 62.7 56.3 Heavy Trucks: 63.9 62.8 53.7 Leq Night 61.0 54.7 55.0 Ldn 69.7 63.2 63.3 CNEL 70.3 63.4 63.5 68.3 63.4 72.0 72.5 Vehicle Noise: 72.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 87 94 65 dBA 187 201 60 dBA 403 434 55 dBA 869 935 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,051 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.19 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.43 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.39 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.0 65.4 63.6 Medium Trucks: 60.6 59.4 53.0 Heavy Trucks: 61.0 59.9 50.9 Leq Night 57.6 51.5 52.1 Ldn 66.2 59.9 60.5 CNEL 66.8 60.2 60.6 Vehicle Noise: 68.7 67.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 70.6 67.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.7 71.3 71.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 78 84 65 dBA 168 181 60 dBA 363 390 55 dBA 782 841 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,302 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.26 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.50 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.46 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.9 66.3 64.6 Medium Trucks: 61.5 60.3 54.0 Heavy Trucks: 61.9 60.8 51.8 Leq Night 58.5 52.4 53.0 Ldn 67.1 60.9 61.4 CNEL 67.7 61.1 61.5 64.2 59.4 68.0 68.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 40 43 65 dBA 85 92 60 dBA 55 dBA 184 396 197 425 199 68.2 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.1 60.4 68.9 69.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 46 49 65 dBA 98 106 60 dBA 55 dBA 212 457 228 490 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,097 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Dlsfance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.00 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.24 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.20 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 67.2 65.6 63.8 Medium Trucks: 60.8 59.6 53.2 Heavy Trucks: 61.2 60.1 51.0 Leq Night 57.8 51.7 52.3 Ldn 66.4 60.1 60.6 CNEL 67.0 60.4 60.8 Vehicle Noise: 68.9 67.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 21,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,953 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Dlsfance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 0.50 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -16.74 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -20.70 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 69.7 68.1 66.3 Medium Trucks: 63.3 62.1 55.7 Heavy Trucks: 63.7 62.6 53.5 Leq Night 60.3 54.2 54.8 Ldn 68.9 62.6 63.1 CNEL 69.5 62.9 63.3 64.4 59.6 68.2 68.6 Vehicle Noise: 71.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 41 44 65 dBA 88 94 60 dBA 189 203 55 dBA 407 438 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 18,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,674 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Dlsfance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.17 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.41 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.37 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 69.0 67.4 65.7 Medium Trucks: 62.6 61.4 55.0 Heavy Trucks: 63.0 61.9 52.9 Leq Night 59.6 53.5 54.1 Ldn 68.2 62.0 62.5 CNEL 68.8 62.2 62.6 Vehicle Noise: 70.7 69.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 69.9 66.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.1 70.7 71.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 60 64 65 dBA 129 138 60 dBA 278 298 55 dElA 598 643 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 7,900 vehicles 9.30% 735 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Dlsfance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -3.29 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -20.53 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -24.48 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 64.4 62.8 61.1 Medium Trucks: 58.2 57.0 50.6 Heavy Trucks: 59.0 57.9 48.9 Leq Night 55.0 49.1 50.1 Ldn 63.6 57.5 58.5 CNEL 64.2 57.8 58.6 66.2 61.4 70.0 70.5 Vehicle Noise: 66.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA I 54 58 65 dBA 116 125 60 dBA I 55 dBA 251 540 269 580 200 64.8 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.7 57.0 65.5 66.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 26 28 65 dBA 55 59 I 60 dBA 119 128 55 dBA 257 276 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,330 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.17 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.41 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.36 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.5 64.9 63.1 Medium Trucks: 60.1 58.9 52.5 Heavy Trucks: 60.5 59.4 50.3 Leq Night 57.1 51.0 51.6 Ldn 65.7 59.4 59.9 CNEL 66.3 59.7 60.1 Vehicle Noise: 68.2 66.8 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,283 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.32 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.56 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.52 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.3 64.8 63.0 Medium Trucks: 59.9 58.7 52.4 Heavy Trucks: 60.3 59.2 50.2 Leq Night 56.9 50.8 51.4 Ldn 65.6 59.3 59.8 CNEL 66.2 59.5 59.9 63.7 58.9 67.5 67.9 Vehicle Noise: 68.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 47 65 dBA 94 100 60 dBA 201 216 55 dBA 434 466 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,265 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.39 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.63 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.58 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.8 66.2 64.4 Medium Trucks: 61.4 60.2 53.8 Heavy Trucks: 61.8 60.7 517 Leq Night 58.4 52.3 52.9 Ldn CNEL 67.0 60.7 61.3 67.6 61.0 61.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.5 68.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.6 63.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 58.8 67.3 67.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 42 46 65 dBA 91 98 60 dBA 197 211 55 dBA 424 455 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,237 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.49 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.72 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.68 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.7 66.1 64.3 Medium Trucks: 61.3 60.1 53.7 Heavy Trucks: 61.7 60.6 51.6 Leq Night 58.3 52.2 52.8 Ldn 66.9 60.6 61.2 CNEL 67.5 60.9 61.3 65.0 60.2 68.8 69.2 Vehicle Noise: 69.4 68.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 45 48 65 dBA 96 104 60 dBA 55 dBA 208 448 223 481 201 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.9 60.1 68.7 69.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 44 47 65 dBA 95 102 60 dBA 55 dBA 205 441 220 474 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,228 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.52 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.76 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.71 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 67.7 66.1 64.3 Medium Trucks: 61.3 60.1 53.7 Heavy Trucks: 61.7 60.6 51.5 Leq Night 58.3 522 528 Ldn 66.9 60.6 61.1 CNEL 67.5 60.8 61.3 Vehicle Noise: 69.4 67.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,200 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten I Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -1.62 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.86 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.81 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 67.6 66.0 642 Medium Trucks: 61.2 60.0 53.6 Heavy Trucks: 61.6 60.5 51.4 Leq Night 58.2 52.1 527 Ldn 66.8 60.5 61.0 CNEL 67.4 60.7 61.2 64.9 60.1 68.7 69.1 Vehicle Noise: 69.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 44 47 65 dBA 95 102 60 dBA 204 219 55 dBA 439 472 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,628 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.29 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.53 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.49 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.9 67.3 65.5 Medium Trucks: 62.5 61.3 54.9 Heavy Trucks: 62.9 61.8 52.8 Leq Night 59.5 53.4 54.0 Ldn 68.1 61.8 62.4 CNEL 68.7 62.1 62.5 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 69.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.8 64.8 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.0 68.6 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 43 46 65 dBA 93 100 60 dBA 201 216 55 dBA 432 464 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,646 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.24 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.48 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.44 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.9 67.4 65.6 Medium Trucks: 62.5 61.3 55.0 Heavy Trucks: 62.9 61.8 52.8 Leq Night 59.5 53.4 54.1 Ldn 68.2 61.9 62.4 CNEL I 68.8 62.1 62.5 66.1 61.3 69.9 70.3 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 114 123 60 dBA 246 284 55 dBA 530 569 202 69.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 66.2 61.4 69.9 70.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 115 124 60 dBA 248 266 55 dBA 534 573 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 13,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,265 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.39 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.63 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.58 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 66.3 64.7 62.9 Medium Tmcks: 59.8 58.7 52.3 Heavy Trucks: 60.3 59.2 50.1 Leq Night 56.9 50.7 51.4 Ldn 65.5 59.2 59.7 CNEL 66.1 59.4 59.9 Vehicle Noise: 68.0 66.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,358 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.08 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.32 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.27 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.1 66.5 64.8 Medium Tmcks: 61.7 60.5 54.1 Heavy Trucks: 62.1 61.0 52.0 Leq Night 58.7 52.6 53.2 Ldn 67.3 61.1 61.6 CNEL 67.9 61.3 61.7 63.5 58.7 67.3 67.7 Vehicle Noise: 69.8 68.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 42 45 65 dBA 90 97 60 dBA 195 209 55 dBA 420 451 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 15,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,451 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.79 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.03 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.99 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType 1189 Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.4 66.8 65.0 Medium Tmcks: 62.0 60.8 54.4 Heavy Trucks: 62.4 61.3 52.3 Leq Night 59.0 52.9 53.5 Ldn 67.6 61.3 61.9 CNEL 68.2 61.6 62.0 Vehicle Noise: 70.1 68.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.3 60.5 69.1 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 47 50 65 dBA 101 109 60 dBA 218 234 55 dBA 470 504 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Arlt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 9,700 vehicles 9.30% 902 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.86 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.09 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.05 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 66.3 64.7 63.0 Medium Tmcks: 59.9 58.7 52.4 Heavy Trucks: 60.3 59.2 50.2 Leq Night 56.9 50.8 51.4 Ldn 65.5 59.3 59.8 CNEL I 66.2 59.5 59.9 65.6 60.8 69.4 69.8 Vehicle Noise: 68.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 49 53 65 dBA 106 114 60 dBA 55 dBA 228 491 245 527 203 66.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.5 58.8 67.3 67.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 36 38 65 dBA 77 83 60 dBA 1 55 dBA 166 357 178 384 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,800 vehicles 9.30% 446 vehicles 50 mph 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.91 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.15 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.11 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.3 61.7 59.9 Medium Trucks: 56.9 55.7 49.3 Heavy Trucks: 57.3 56.2 47.1 Leq Night 53.9 47.8 48.4 Ldn 62.5 56.2 56.7 CNEL 63.1 56.5 56.9 Vehicle Noise: 65.0 63.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 6,700 vehicles 9.30% 623 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -4.01 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -21.24 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -25.20 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.7 62.1 60.3 Medium Trucks: 57.5 56.3 49.9 Heavy Trucks: 58.3 57.2 48.2 Leq Night 54.3 48.4 49.4 Ldn 62.9 56.8 57.8 CNEL 63.5 57.1 57.9 60.5 55.7 64.3 64.7 Vehicle Noise: 65.5 64.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 22 24 65 dBA 48 52 60 dBA 104 112 55 dBA 224 240 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,200 vehicles 9.30% 763 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Ban-ier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -3.13 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -20.37 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -24.32 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.6 63.0 61.2 Medium Trucks: 58.3 57.2 50.8 Heavy Trucks: 59.2 58.1 49.0 Leq Night 55.2 49.2 50.3 Ldn 63.8 57.7 58.7 CNEL 64.4 57.9 58.8 Vehicle Noise: 66.4 65.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.0 56.3 64.8 65.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 23 25 65 dBA 50 53 60 dBA 107 115 55 dBA 230 247 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 5,800 vehicles 9.30% 539 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks: 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -5.09 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -22.33 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -26.28 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.0 61.4 597 Medium Trucks: 56.6 55.4 49.0 Heavy Trucks: 57.0 55.9 46.9 Leq Night 53.6 47.5 48.1 Ldn 62.2 56.0 56.5 CNEL 62.8 56.2 56.6 61.8 57.2 65.7 66.2 Vehicle Noise: 64.7 63.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 26 28 65 dBA 57 61 60 dBA 55 dBA 122 263 131 283 204 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.2 55.5 64.0 64.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 24 25 65 dBA 51 54 60 dBA 55 dBA 109 235 117 253 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: FAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 4,000 vehicles 9.30% 372 vehicles 50 mph 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -6.70 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -23.94 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -27.90 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 61.4 59.8 58.1 Medium Trucks: 55.0 53.8 47.4 Heavy Trucks: 55.4 54.3 45.3 Leq Night 52.0 45.9 46.5 Ldn 60.6 54.3 54.9 CNEL 61.2 54.6 55.0 Vehicle Noise: 63.1 61.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: EAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 2,300 vehicles 9.30% 214 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 40.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 40.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 -8.14 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -25.38 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -29.33 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 58.8 57.2 55.4 Medium Trucks: 52.8 51.6 45.2 Heavy Trucks: 54.1 53.0 43.9 Leq Night Ldn 49.3 43.7 45.2 58.0 52.1 53.5 CNEL 58.6 52.3 53.7 58.6 53.8 62.4 62.9 Vehicle Noise: 60.8 59.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 dBA 18 40 20 42 60 dBA 85 92 55 dBA 184 197 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 8,500 vehicles 9.30% 791 vehicles 45 mph 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Banier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -2.97 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -20.21 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -24.17 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 64.7 63.1 61.4 Medium Trucks: 58.5 57.3 50.9 Heavy Trucks: 59.3 58.2 49.2 Leq Night 55.3 49.4 50.5 Ldn 63.9 57.9 58.8 CNEL 64.5 58.1 58.9 Vehicle Noise: 66.6 65.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 56.1 51.5 60.1 60.5 70 dBA 65 dBA Ldn: 9 19 CNEL: 9 20 Wednesday, March 25, 2020 60 dBA 40 43 55 dBA 87 93 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: PAPC26SE Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: Vehicle Speed: Near/Far Lane Distance: 6,600 vehicles 9.30% 614 vehicles 50 mph 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -4.53 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -21.77 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -25.72 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 63.2 61.7 59.9 Medium Trucks: 56.8 55.6 49.3 Heavy Trucks: 57.2 56.1 47.1 Leq Night 53.8 477 48.3 Ldn 62.5 56.2 56.7 CNEL 63.1 56.4 56.8 62.0 57.3 65.9 66.3 Vehicle Noise: 64.9 63.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 27 29 65 dBA 58 62 60 dBA 55 dBA 125 270 134 289 205 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 60.4 55.7 64.2 64.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 26 28 65 dBA 57 61 60 dBA 55 dBA 122 263 131 283 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 51,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 4,790 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 3.98 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -13.26 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -17.21 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 74.0 72.4 707 Medium Trucks: 67.4 66.2 59.9 Heavy Trucks: 67.5 66.4 57.3 Leq Night 64.6 58.3 58.6 Ldn 73.2 66.8 66.9 CNEL 73.8 67.0 67.0 Vehicle Noise: 75.6 74.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 34,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,190 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Dlsfance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 2.22 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -15.02 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -18.98 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 72.3 70.7 68.9 Medium Trucks: 65.7 64.5 58.1 Heavy Trucks: 65.7 64.6 55.6 Leq Night 62.8 56.6 56.8 Ldn 71.5 65.0 65.2 CNEL 72.1 65.3 65.3 71.2 66.3 74.9 75.4 Vehicle Noise: 73.8 72.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 135 146 65 dBA 292 314 60 dBA 628 676 55 dBA 1,354 1,456 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Jefferson St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 32,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,995 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer. Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 1.94 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -15.30 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -19.25 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 72.0 70.4 68.6 Medium Trucks: 65.4 64.2 57.8 Heavy Trucks: 65.4 64.3 55.3 Leq Night 62.6 56.3 56.5 Ldn 71.2 64.7 64.9 CNEL 71.8 65.0 65.0 Vehicle Noise: 73.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 69.4 64.6 73.1 73.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 103 111 65 dBA 222 239 60 dBA 479 515 55 dBA 1,032 1,111 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 22,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,093 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 0.80 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -16.44 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -20.40 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.0 68.4 66.6 Medium Trucks: 63.6 62.4 56.0 Heavy Trucks: 64.0 62.9 53.8 Leq Night 60.6 54.5 55.1 Ldn 69.2 62.9 63.4 CNEL 69.8 63.2 63.6 72.1 69.2 64.3 72.8 73.3 Vehicle Noise: 71.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 99 106 65 dBA 213 229 60 dBA 459 494 55 dBA 990 1,065 206 70.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.2 62.4 71.0 71.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 63 67 65 dBA 135 145 60 dBA 291 312 55 dBA 626 673 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 32,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,004 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrer Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 2.37 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -14.87 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -18.83 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 71.6 70.0 68.2 Medium Trucks: 65.1 63.9 57.6 Heavy Trucks: 65.6 64.4 55.4 Leq Night 62.1 56.0 56.7 Ldn 70.8 64.5 65.0 CNEL I 71.4 64.7 65.1 Vehicle Noise: 73.3 71.8 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 23,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,204 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten I Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 1.02 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -16.21 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -20.17 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 70.2 68.6 66.9 Medium Trucks: 63.8 62.6 56.2 Heavy Trucks: 64.2 63.1 54.1 Leq Night 60.8 54.7 55.3 Ldn 69.4 63.2 63.7 CNEL 70.0 63.4 63.8 68.8 64.0 72.5 73.0 Vehicle Noise: 71.9 70.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 80 86 65 dBA 172 185 60 dBA 370 398 55 dBA 797 856 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 42,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,953 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Bonn Atten Autos: 70.20 3.56 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -13.68 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -17.63 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 72.7 71.2 69.4 Medium Trucks: 66.3 65.1 58.8 Heavy Trucks: 66.7 65.6 56.6 Leq Night 63.3 57.2 57.9 Ldn 72.0 65.7 66.2 CNEL 72.6 65.9 66.3 Vehicle Noise: 74.4 73.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.4 62.6 71.2 71.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 65 70 65 dBA 140 150 60 dBA 301 323 55 dBA 649 697 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 31,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,883 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 2.19 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -15.05 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -19.00 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 71.4 69.8 68.0 Medium Trucks: 65.0 63.8 57.4 Heavy Trucks: 65.4 64.3 55.2 Leq Night 62.0 55.9 56.5 Ldn 70.6 64.3 64.8 CNEL 71.2 64.6 65.0 70.0 65.2 73.7 74.2 Vehicle Noise: 73.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 96 103 65 dBA 206 222 60 dBA 1 55 dBA 444 957 477 1,028 207 71.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 68.6 63.8 72.4 72.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 78 83 65 dBA 167 180 60 dBA 360 387 55 dBA 776 833 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 19,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,767 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 0.52 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -16.72 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -20.67 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.2 66.6 64.9 Medium Trucks: 62.0 60.8 54.4 Heavy Trucks: 62.8 61.7 52.7 Leq Night 58.8 52.9 53.9 Ldn 67.4 61.4 62.3 CNEL 68.0 61.6 62.4 Vehicle Noise: 70.1 68.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 15,100 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,404 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barriers 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -0.93 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.17 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.13 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.7 65.1 63.4 Medium Trucks: 60.3 59.1 52.7 Heavy Trucks: 60.7 59.6 50.6 Leq Night 57.3 51.2 51.8 Ldn 65.9 59.7 60.2 CNEL 66.5 59.9 60.3 65.5 60.8 69.3 69.8 Vehicle Noise: 68.4 67.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 46 49 65 dBA 99 107 60 dBA 214 230 55 dBA 461 495 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 19,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,795 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barriers 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 0.13 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.11 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.06 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.8 66.2 64.4 Medium Trucks: 61.4 60.2 53.8 Heavy Trucks: 61.8 60.7 51.6 Leq Night 58.4 52.3 52.9 Ldn CNEL 67.0 60.7 61.2 67.6 61.0 61.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.5 68.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.9 59.2 67.7 68.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 45 48 65 dBA 97 104 60 dBA 209 224 55 dBA 450 484 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 31,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,911 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 2.23 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -15.01 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -18.96 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 71.4 69.8 68.1 Medium Trucks: 65.0 63.8 57.4 Heavy Trucks: 65.4 64.3 55.3 Leq Night 62.0 55.9 56.5 Ldn 70.6 64.4 64.9 CNEL 71.2 64.6 65.0 65.0 60.2 68.8 69.2 Vehicle Noise: 73.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 114 123 60 dBA 246 284 55 dBA 530 570 208 71.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 68.6 63.9 72.4 72.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 78 84 65 dBA 168 181 60 dBA 55 dBA 362 781 389 839 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 34,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,190 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Tmcks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Tmcks: 47.677 Heavy Tmcks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 2.63 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 81.00 -14.61 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -18.56 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 71.8 70.2 68.5 Medium Tmcks: 65.4 64.2 57.8 Heavy Tmcks: 65.8 64.7 55.7 Leq Night 62.4 56.3 56.9 Ldn 71.0 64.8 65.3 CNEL 71.6 65.0 65.4 Vehicle Noise: 73.5 72.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 24,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,316 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Tmcks: 47.677 Heavy Tmcks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Dlsfance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 1.24 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 81.00 -16.00 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Tmcks: 85.38 -19.96 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.4 68.8 67.1 Medium Tmcks: 64.0 62.8 56.5 Heavy Tmcks: 64.4 63.3 54.3 Leq Night 61.0 54.9 55.5 Ldn 69.6 63.4 63.9 CNEL 70.2 63.6 64.0 69.0 64.3 72.8 73.3 Vehicle Noise: 72.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 83 89 65 dBA 179 192 60 dBA 385 414 55 dBA 830 891 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 26,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,492 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Tmcks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Tmcks: 47.677 Heavy Tmcks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 1.56 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 81.00 -15.68 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Tmcks: 85.38 -19.64 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.7 69.2 67.4 Medium Tmcks: 64.3 63.1 56.8 Heavy Tmcks: 64.7 63.6 54.6 Leq Night 61.3 55.2 55.9 Ldn 70.0 63.7 64.2 CNEL 70.6 63.9 64.3 Vehicle Noise: 72.4 71.0 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 70.7 67.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 62.9 71.4 71.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 67 72 65 dBA 144 155 60 dBA 311 334 55 dBA 670 720 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,600 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Tmcks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Tmcks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Tmcks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.37 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 81.00 -17.61 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Tmcks: 85.38 -21.56 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.8 67.2 65.5 Medium Tmcks: 62.4 61.2 54.8 Heavy Tmcks: 62.8 61.7 527 Leq Night 59.4 53.3 53.9 Ldn 68.0 61.8 62.3 CNEL 68.6 62.0 62.4 68.0 63.2 71.7 72.2 Vehicle Noise: 70.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 70 76 65 dBA 152 163 60 dBA 327 351 55 dBA 704 756 209 69.1 66.0 61.3 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 69.8 70.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 52 56 65 dBA L 60 dBA 113 243 121 261 55 dBA 524 563 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 27,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,585 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centedine Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 1.72 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -15.52 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -19.48 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 70.9 69.3 67.6 Medium Trucks: 64.5 63.3 56.9 Heavy Trucks: 64.9 63.8 54.8 Leq Night 61.5 55.4 56.0 Ldn 70.1 63.8 64.4 CNEL 70.7 64.1 64.5 Vehicle Noise: 72.6 71.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 20,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,934 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barriers 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 0.46 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -16.78 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -20.74 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.1 66.5 64.8 Medium Trucks: 61.7 60.5 54.1 Heavy Trucks: 62.1 61.0 52.0 Leq Night 58.7 52.6 53.2 Ldn 67.3 61.1 61.6 CNEL 67.9 61.3 61.7 68.1 63.3 71.9 72.4 Vehicle Noise: 69.8 68.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 72 77 65 dBA 155 167 60 dBA 335 360 55 dBA 721 775 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 25,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,390 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 1.38 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -15.86 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -19.82 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 70.6 69.0 67.2 Medium Trucks: 64.1 63.0 56.6 Heavy Trucks: 64.6 63.5 54.4 Leq Night 61.2 55.0 55.7 Ldn 69.8 63.5 64.0 CNEL 70.4 63.7 64.2 Vehicle Noise: 72.3 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.3 60.5 69.1 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 56 60 65 dBA 120 129 60 dBA 259 278 55 dBA 557 599 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 30,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,809 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 2.08 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -15.16 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -19.12 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 71.3 69.7 67.9 Medium Trucks: 64.8 63.7 57.3 Heavy Trucks: 65.3 64.2 55.1 Leq Night 61.9 55.7 56.4 Ldn 70.5 64.2 64.7 CNEL 71.1 64.4 64.9 70.8 67.8 63.0 71.5 72.0 Vehicle Noise: 73.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 68 74 65 dBA 147 158 60 dBA 318 341 55 dBA 685 735 210 71.5 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 68.5 63.7 72.2 72.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 76 82 65 dBA 164 176 60 dBA 354 380 55 dBA 762 819 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,646 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.24 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.48 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.44 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.9 67.4 65.6 Medium Trucks: 62.5 61.3 55.0 Heavy Trucks: 62.9 61.8 52.8 Leq Night 59.5 53.4 54.1 Ldn 68.2 61.9 62.4 CNEL 68.8 62.1 62.5 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 69.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Airport BI. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 16,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,553 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten I Autos: 70.20 -0.50 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.73 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.69 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.7 67.1 65.3 Medium Trucks: 62.3 61.1 54.7 Heavy Trucks: 62.7 61.6 52.5 Leq Night 59.3 53.2 53.8 Ldn 67.9 61.6 62.2 CNEL 68.5 61.9 62.3 66.2 61.4 69.9 70.4 Vehicle Noise: 70.4 69.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 115 124 60 dBA 248 266 55 dBA 534 573 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 11,900 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,107 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bean Atten Autos: 68.46 -1.51 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -18.75 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -22.70 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.2 64.6 62.8 Medium Trucks: 60.0 58.8 52.4 Heavy Trucks: 60.8 59.7 507 Leq Night 56.8 50.9 51.9 Ldn 65.4 59.3 60.3 CNEL 66.0 59.6 60.4 Vehicle Noise: 68.0 66.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (en feet) 65.9 61.1 69.7 70.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 51 55 65 dBA 111 119 60 dBA 238 256 55 dBA 514 552 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,135 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -1.40 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -18.64 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -22.60 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.3 64.7 62.9 Medium Trucks: 60.1 58.9 52.5 Heavy Trucks: 60.9 59.8 50.8 Leq Night 56.9 51.0 52.0 Ldn 65.5 59.4 60.4 CNEL 66.1 59.7 60.5 63.4 58.8 67.3 67.8 Vehicle Noise: 68.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 34 36 65 dBA 73 78 60 dBA 55 dBA 157 338 168 362 211 66.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.6 58.9 67.4 67.9 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 34 37 65 dBA 74 79 60 dBA 159 171 55 dBA 343 368 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 18,200 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,693 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.12 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.36 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.32 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.0 66.4 64.6 Medium Trucks: 61.6 60.4 54.0 Heavy Trucks: 62.0 60.9 51.8 Leq Night 58.6 52.5 53.1 Ldn 67.2 60.9 61.5 CNEL 67.8 61.2 61.6 Vehicle Noise: 69.7 68.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): Peak Hour Percentage: Peak Hour Volume: 9,400 vehicles 9.30% 874 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 59.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 59.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten I Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -2.99 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -20.23 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -24.19 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 65.1 63.5 61.8 Medium Trucks: 58.7 57.5 51.1 Heavy Trucks: 59.1 58.0 49.0 Leq Night 55.7 49.6 502 Ldn 64.3 58.1 58.6 CNEL 64.9 58.3 58.7 65.2 60.4 69.0 69.4 Vehicle Noise: 66.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 50 54 65 dBA 109 117 60 dBA 234 251 55 dBA 504 541 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 20,800 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,934 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 40.0 feet 40.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 1.43 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -15.81 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -19.77 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 68.3 66.7 65.0 Medium Trucks: 62.3 61.1 54.8 Heavy Trucks: 63.6 62.5 53.5 Leq Night 58.9 53.2 54.7 Ldn 67.5 61.7 63.1 CNEL 68.1 61.9 63.2 Vehicle Noise: 70.3 68.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.4 62.3 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 57.6 66.1 66.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 32 35 65 dBA 70 75 60 dBA 151 182 55 dBA 324 349 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 22,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,111 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day IEveningl Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 1.29 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -15.94 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -19.90 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 69.0 67.4 65.6 Medium Trucks: 62.8 61.6 55.2 Heavy Trucks: 63.6 62.5 53.5 Leq Night 59.6 53.7 54.7 Ldn 68.2 62.1 63.1 CNEL 68.8 62.4 63.2 65.6 61.1 69.6 70.1 Vehicle Noise: 70.8 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 38 40 65 dBA 81 87 60 dBA 175 188 55 dBA 378 404 212 69.4 66.3 61.6 70.1 70.6 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 52 56 65 dBA 112 120 L 60 dBA 241 259 55 dBA 519 557 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GP40 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,300 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,330 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -1.17 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.41 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.36 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.6 65.0 63.2 Medium Trucks: 60.2 59.0 52.6 Heavy Trucks: 60.6 59.5 50.4 Leq Night 57.2 51.1 51.7 Ldn 65.8 59.5 60.0 CNEL 66.4 59.8 60.2 Vehicle Noise: 68.3 66.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 52,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 4,836 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 4.02 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -13.22 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -17.17 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 74.1 72.5 707 Medium Trucks: 67.5 66.3 59.9 Heavy Trucks: 67.5 66.4 57.4 Leq Night 64.7 58.4 58.6 Ldn 73.3 66.8 67.0 CNEL 73.9 67.1 67.1 63.8 59.0 67.6 68.0 Vehicle Noise: 75.6 74.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 44 47 65 dBA 95 102 60 dBA 205 220 55 dBA 441 474 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 35,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,255 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 2.30 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -14.94 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -18.89 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 72.3 70.8 69.0 Medium Trucks: 65.7 64.6 58.2 Heavy Trucks: 65.8 64.7 55.6 Leq Night 62.9 56.6 56.9 Ldn 71.6 65.1 65.2 CNEL 72.2 65.3 65.4 Vehicle Noise: 73.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 71.2 66.4 74.9 75.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 136 147 65 dBA 294 316 60 dBA 632 680 55 dBA 1,362 1,486 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Jefferson SL Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 33,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,069 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 55 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 71 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 53.486 Medium Trucks: 53.320 Heavy Trucks: 53.337 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 71.78 2.05 -0.54 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 82.40 -15.19 -0.52 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 86.40 -19.15 -0.52 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 72.1 70.5 687 Medium Trucks: 65.5 64.3 57.9 Heavy Trucks: 65.5 64.4 55.4 Leq Night 62.7 56.4 56.6 Ldn 71.3 64.9 65.0 CNEL 71.9 65.1 65.1 72.5 69.5 64.6 73.2 73.7 Vehicle Noise: 73.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 105 113 65 dBA 225 243 60 dBA 55 dBA 486 1,046 522 1,126 213 72.2 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 69.3 64.4 72.9 73.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 101 108 65 dBA 217 233 L 60 dBA 467 502 55 dBA 1,006 1,082 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 23,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,139 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 0.89 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -16.34 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -20.30 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 70.1 68.5 66.7 Medium Trucks: 63.7 62.5 56.1 Heavy Trucks: 64.1 63.0 53.9 Leq Night 60.7 54.6 55.2 Ldn 69.3 63.0 63.5 CNEL 69.9 63.3 63.7 Vehicle Noise: 71.8 70.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenado: GPP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 33,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,069 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 2.46 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -14.78 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -18.73 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 71.6 70.1 68.3 Medium Trucks: 65.2 64.0 57.7 Heavy Trucks: 65.6 64.5 55.5 Leq Night 1 Ldn 62.2 56.1 56.8 70.9 64.6 65.1 CNEL 71.5 64.8 65.2 67.3 62.5 71.1 71.5 Vehicle Noise: 73.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 64 68 65 dBA 137 147 60 dBA 295 317 55 dBA 636 683 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 25,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,325 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 1.26 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -15.98 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -19.94 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 70.4 68.9 67.1 Medium Trucks: 64.0 62.8 56.5 Heavy Trucks: 64.4 63.3 54.3 Leq Night 61.0 54.9 55.6 Ldn 69.7 63.4 63.9 CNEL 70.3 63.6 64.0 Vehicle Noise: 72.1 70.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 71.9 68.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.1 72.6 73.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 81 87 65 dBA 174 187 60 dBA 375 403 55 dBA 809 869 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 45,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 4,185 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Tmcks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 3.81 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -13.43 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -17.39 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 73.0 71.4 69.6 Medium Trucks: 66.6 65.4 59.0 Heavy Trucks: 67.0 65.9 56.9 Leq Night 63.6 57.5 58.1 Ldn 72.2 65.9 66.5 CNEL I 72.8 66.2 66.6 67.7 62.9 71.4 71.9 Vehicle Noise: 74.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 67 72 65 dBA 145 156 60 dBA 55 dBA 312 672 335 722 214 73.3 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 70.2 65.4 74.0 74.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 99 107 65 dBA 214 230 60 dBA 462 496 55 dBA 994 1,068 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 34,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,162 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier. Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 2.59 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -14.65 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -18.60 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and bander attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 71.8 70.2 68.4 Medium Trucks: 65.4 64.2 57.8 Heavy Trucks: 65.8 64.7 55.6 Leq Night 62.4 56.3 56.9 Ldn 71.0 64.7 65.2 CNEL 71.6 65.0 65.4 Vehicle Noise: 73.5 72.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenado: GPP40 Road Name: Madison St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 20,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,860 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 51.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 0.74 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -16.49 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -20.45 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.4 66.9 65.1 Medium Trucks: 62.2 61.0 54.7 Heavy Trucks: 63.1 62.0 52.9 Leq Night 59.0 53.1 54.2 Ldn 67.7 61.6 62.5 CNEL 68.3 61.8 62.7 69.0 64.2 72.8 73.2 Vehicle Noise: 70.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 82 89 65 dBA 178 191 60 dBA 383 411 55 dBA 825 886 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 50 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 15,600 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,451 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1-Benn): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Bean Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.79 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.03 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.99 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.9 65.3 63.5 Medium Trucks: 60.4 59.2 52.9 Heavy Trucks: 60.9 59.8 50.7 Leq Night 57.5 51.3 52.0 Ldn 66.1 59.8 60.3 CNEL 66.7 60.0 60.5 Vehicle Noise: 68.6 67.1 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.1 68.9 65.7 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.0 69.6 70.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 48 51 65 dBA 103 110 60 dBA 222 238 55 dBA 477 512 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 52 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 20,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,860 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 64.0 feet 64.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 0.29 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -16.95 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -20.91 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 67.9 66.4 64.6 Medium Trucks: 61.5 60.3 54.0 Heavy Trucks: 61.9 60.8 51.8 Leq Night 58.5 52.4 53.0 Ldn 67.2 60.9 61.4 CNEL 67.8 61.1 61.5 59.3 67.8 68.3 Vehicle Noise: 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 46 49 65 dBA 99 106 60 dBA 55 dBA 214 460 229 494 215 68.2 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.2 60.4 68.9 69.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 54 58 65 dBA 117 126 60 dBA 252 271 55 dBA 543 583 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 54 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 32,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,976 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 2.33 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -14.91 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -18.87 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 71.5 69.9 68.2 Medium Trucks: 65.1 63.9 57.5 Heavy Trucks: 65.5 64.4 55.4 Leq Night 62.1 56.0 56.6 Ldn 70.7 64.5 65.0 CNEL I 71.3 64.7 65.1 Vehicle Noise: 73.2 71.8 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenado: GPP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Airport BI. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 35,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 3,255 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType I REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten I Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 2.72 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -14.52 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -18.48 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 71.9 70.3 68.6 Medium Trucks: 65.5 64.3 57.9 Heavy Trucks: 65.9 64.8 55.8 Leq Night 62.5 56.4 57.0 Ldn 71.1 64.8 65.4 CNEL 71.7 65.1 65.5 68.7 63.9 72.5 73.0 Vehicle Noise: 73.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 79 85 65 dBA 171 183 60 dBA 368 395 55 dBA 792 851 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 58 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 26,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,418 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day IEveningl Night I Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 1.43 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -15.81 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -19.77 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 70.6 69.0 67.3 Medium Trucks: 64.2 63.0 56.6 Heavy Trucks: 64.6 63.5 54.5 Leq Night 61.2 55.1 55.7 Ldn 69.8 63.6 64.1 CNEL 70.4 63.8 64.2 Vehicle Noise: 72.3 72.2 69.1 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 64.3 72.9 73.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 84 90 65 dBA 181 195 60 dBA 390 419 55 dBA 841 904 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Monroe St. Road Segment: n/o Avenue 60 Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 27,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,511 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType I Day Evening Night I Daily I Slte Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType 1 REMEL I Traffic Flow I Distance I Finite Road I Fresnel I BarrierAtten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 1.59 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -15.65 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -19.60 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType I Leq Peak Hour I Leq Day I Leq Evening I Autos: 70.8 69.2 67.4 Medium Trucks: 64.4 63.2 56.8 Heavy Trucks: 64.8 63.7 54.6 Leq Night 61.4 55.3 55.9 Ldn 70.0 63.7 64.2 CNEL 70.6 64.0 64.4 70.9 67.8 63.0 71.6 72.1 Vehicle Noise: 72.5 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 69 74 65 dBA 149 160 60 dBA 320 344 55 dBA 690 741 216 71.0 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 68.0 63.2 71.8 72.2 70 dBA 1 65 dBA 1 60 dBA Ldn: 71 152 328 CNEL: 76 164 353 Wednesday, March 25, 2020 55 dBA 707 760 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Jefferson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,700 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,646 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.24 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.48 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.44 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.9 67.4 65.6 Medium Trucks: 62.5 61.3 55.0 Heavy Trucks: 62.9 61.8 52.8 Leq Night 59.5 53.4 54.1 Ldn 68.2 61.9 62.4 CNEL 68.8 62.1 62.5 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 69.2 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 28,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,604 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 54.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 54.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 1.75 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -15.49 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -19.45 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.9 69.3 67.6 Medium Trucks: 64.5 63.3 57.0 Heavy Trucks: 64.9 63.8 54.8 Leq Night 61.5 55.4 56.0 Ldn 70.2 63.9 64.4 CNEL 70.8 64.1 64.5 66.2 61.4 69.9 70.4 Vehicle Noise: 72.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 53 57 65 dBA 115 124 60 dBA 248 266 55 dBA 534 573 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 50 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 21,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,953 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 43 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I S/te Data Barter Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier. 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 60.488 Medium Trucks: 60.341 Heavy Trucks: 60.355 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 0.50 -1.34 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -16.74 -1.33 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -20.70 -1.33 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.2 66.6 64.8 Medium Trucks: 61.7 60.5 54.2 Heavy Trucks: 62.2 61.0 52.0 Leq Night 58.8 52.6 53.3 Ldn 67.4 61.1 61.6 CNEL 68.0 61.3 61.7 Vehicle Noise: 69.9 68.4 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 71.2 68.1 63.4 71.9 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 72.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 72 78 65 dBA 156 168 60 dBA 336 381 55 dBA 725 779 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 52 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 26,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,418 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 1.43 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -15.81 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -19.77 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 70.6 69.0 67.3 Medium Trucks: 64.2 63.0 56.6 Heavy Trucks: 64.6 63.5 54.5 Leq Night 61.2 55.1 55.7 Ldn 69.8 63.6 64.1 CNEL 70.4 63.8 64.2 65.4 60.6 69.1 69.6 Vehicle Noise: 72.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 56 60 65 dBA 121 130 60 dBA 55 dBA 260 561 280 602 217 70.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.8 63.0 71.6 72.1 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 69 74 65 dBA 149 160 60 dBA 320 344 55 dBA 690 741 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 31,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,883 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 2.19 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -15.05 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -19.00 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 71.4 69.8 68.0 Medium Trucks: 65.0 63.8 57.4 Heavy Trucks: 65.4 64.3 55.2 Leq Night 62.0 55.9 56.5 Ldn 70.6 64.3 64.8 CNEL 71.2 64.6 65.0 Vehicle Noise: 73.1 71.6 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 54 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 18,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,674 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.17 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.41 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.37 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 69.0 67.4 65.7 Medium Trucks: 62.6 61.4 55.0 Heavy Trucks: 63.0 61.9 52.9 Leq Night 59.6 53.5 54.1 Ldn 68.2 62.0 62.5 CNEL I 68.8 62.2 62.6 68.6 63.8 72.4 72.8 Vehicle Noise: 70.7 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 78 83 65 dBA 167 180 60 dBA 360 387 55 dBA 776 833 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Airport R. Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 17,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,581 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 51 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 54.0 feet 54.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 47.862 Medium Trucks: 47.677 Heavy Trucks: 47.695 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -0.42 0.18 -1.20 -4.67 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.66 0.21 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.61 0.20 -1.20 -5.39 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.8 67.2 65.4 Medium Trucks: 62.3 61.2 54.8 Heavy Trucks: 62.8 61.7 52.6 Leq Night 59.4 53.3 53.9 Ldn 68.0 61.7 62.2 CNEL 68.6 61.9 62.4 Vehicle Noise: 70.5 69.0 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 69.3 66.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.4 70.0 70.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 54 58 65 dBA 116 125 60 dBA 251 269 55 dBA 540 580 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,163 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -1.30 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -18.54 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -22.49 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.4 64.8 63.0 Medium Trucks: 60.2 59.0 52.6 Heavy Trucks: 61.0 59.9 50.9 Leq Night 57.0 51.1 52.1 Ldn 65.6 59.5 60.5 CNEL 66.2 59.8 60.6 66.0 61.2 69.7 70.2 Vehicle Noise: 68.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 52 56 65 dBA 112 120 60 dBA 241 259 55 dBA 520 558 218 66.8 I Centedine Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 63.7 59.0 67.5 68.0 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 35 37 65 dBA 75 81 60 dBA 162 174 55 dBA 349 374 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 14,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,302 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 -0.80 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -18.04 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -22.00 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.9 65.3 63.5 Medium Trucks: 60.7 59.5 53.1 Heavy Trucks: 61.5 60.4 51.4 Leq Night 57.5 51.6 526 Ldn 66.1 60.0 61.0 CNEL 66.7 60.3 61.1 Vehicle Noise: 68.7 67.3 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: w/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 19,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,767 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I Slte Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier:: 59.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 59.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 0.06 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -17.17 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -21.13 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.2 66.6 64.8 Medium Trucks: 61.8 60.6 54.2 Heavy Trucks: 62.2 61.1 52.0 Leq Night 58.8 52.7 53.3 Ldn 67.4 61.1 61.6 CNEL 68.0 61.3 61.8 64.2 59.5 68.0 68.5 Vehicle Noise: 69.9 68.4 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 38 40 65 dBA 81 87 60 dBA 175 187 55 dBA 376 404 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 58 Road Segment: e/o Jackson St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 10,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 930 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 36 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily I S/te Data Barrier Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 59.0 feet 59.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 56.409 Medium Trucks.- 56.252 Heavy Trucks: 56.268 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 70.20 -2.72 -0.89 -1.20 -4.69 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -19.96 -0.87 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -23.92 -0.87 -1.20 -5.35 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 65.4 63.8 62.0 Medium Trucks: 59.0 57.8 51.4 Heavy Trucks: 59.4 58.3 492 Leq Night 56.0 49.9 50.5 Ldn 64.6 58.3 58.8 CNEL 65.2 58.6 59.0 Vehicle Noise: 67.1 65.7 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 65.4 60.6 69.2 69.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 52 56 65 dBA 112 120 60 dBA 241 259 55 dBA 519 557 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Madison St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 22,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,046 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 40 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 23 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 40.0 feet 40.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 38.636 Medium Trucks.- 38.406 Heavy Trucks: 38.429 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 66.51 1.67 1.58 -1.20 -4.59 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 77.72 -15.57 1.62 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 82.99 -19.52 1.61 -1.20 -5.56 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 68.6 67.0 652 Medium Trucks: 62.6 61.4 55.0 Heavy Trucks: 63.9 62.8 53.7 Leq Night 59.2 53.5 55.0 Ldn 67.8 61.9 63.3 CNEL 68.4 62.2 63.5 62.6 57.8 66.4 66.8 Vehicle Noise: 70.6 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA I 34 36 65 dBA 73 78 60 dBA 55 dBA 157 338 169 363 219 69.2 65.9 I Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 61.3 69.9 70.3 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 39 42 65 dBA 60 dBA 55 dBA 84 182 392 90 195 420 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: w/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 24,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 2,232 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening) Night Daily Site Data Barter Height: Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): Centerline Dist. to Barrier: Centerline Dist. to Observer: Barrier Distance to Observer: Observer Height (Above Pad): Pad Elevation: Road Elevation: Road Grade: Leff View: Right View: 0.0 feet 0.0 51.0 feet 51.0 feet 0.0 feet 5.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0 feet 0.0% -90.0 degrees 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 46.041 Medium Trucks: 45.848 Heavy Trucks: 45.867 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: 68.46 1.54 0.43 -1.20 -4.65 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 79.45 -15.70 0.46 -1.20 -4.87 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 84.25 -19.66 0.46 -1.20 -5.42 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 69.2 67.6 65.9 Medium Trucks: 63.0 61.8 55.5 Heavy Trucks: 63.9 62.7 537 Leq Night 59.8 53.9 55.0 Ldn 68.4 62.4 63.3 CNEL 69.1 62.6 63.4 Vehicle Noise: 71.1 69.6 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL Scenario: GPP40 Road Name: Avenue 60 Road Segment: e/o Monroe St. Project Name: The Wave -Coral Mountain Job Number: 12642 SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 15,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 9.30% Peak Hour Volume: 1,395 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 50 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 48 feet Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening Night Daily I Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 0.0 Centerline Dist. to Barriers 64.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 64.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 0.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Leff View: -90.0 degrees Right View: 90.0 degrees Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Tmcks: 2.297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (In feet) Autos: 59.540 Medium Trucks: 59.391 Heavy Trucks: 59.406 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAtten Berm Alton I Autos: 70.20 -0.96 -1.24 -1.20 -4.70 0.000 0.000 Medium Trucks: 81.00 -18.20 -1.22 -1.20 -4.88 0.000 0.000 Heavy Trucks: 85.38 -22.16 -1.23 -1.20 -5.31 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day I Leq Evening Autos: 66.8 65.2 63.5 Medium Trucks: 60.4 59.2 52.8 Heavy Trucks: 60.8 59.7 50.7 Leq Night 57.4 51.3 51.9 Ldn 66.0 59.7 60.3 CNEL 66.6 60.0 60.4 66.5 61.8 70.4 70.8 Vehicle Noise: 68.5 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 54 58 65 dBA 116 125 60 dBA 250 268 55 dBA 539 578 220 67.1 64.0 59.2 Centerline Distance to Noise Contour (in feet) 67.8 68.2 Ldn: CNEL: Wednesday, March 25, 2020 70 dBA 46 49 65 dBA 98 105 60 dBA 211 227 55 dBA 455 489 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis APPENDIX 8.1: ON-SITE TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL CALCULATIONS 12642-10 Noise Study 221 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 222 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012 Scenario: Backyard No Wall Road Name: Avenue 58 Lot No: Planning Area VIII-LDR Project Name: The Wave Job Number: 12462 Analyst: B. Lawson SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Peak Hour Volume: 1,250 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening l Night Daily Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 1.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrer. 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 61.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 1.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 61.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Autos: 56.919 Medium Trucks: 56.763 Heavy Tracks: 56.778 FHWA Noise Model Calculations FHWA Noise Model Cakulations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Baffler Afton Berm Atten Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: 69.34 77.62 82.14 -0.98 -18.22 -22.18 -0.95 -0.93 -0.93 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20 -0.95 -1.15 -1.69 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 66.2 57.3 57.8 64.3 55.8 56.4 62.5 49.4 47.4 56.5 47.9 48.6 65.1 56.3 57.0 65.7 56.6 57.1 67.3 65.5 62.9 57.6 66.2 66.7 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barter attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 66.2 57.3 57.8 64.3 55.8 56.4 62.5 49.4 47.4 56.5 47.9 48.6 65.1 56.3 57.0 65.7 56.6 57.1 67.3 65.5 62.9 57.6 66.2 66.7 Monday, November 11, 2019 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012 Scenario: Backyard With Wall Road Name: Avenue 58 Lot No: Planning Area VIII-LDR Project Name: The Wave Job Number: 12462 Analyst: B. Lawson SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Peak Hour Volume: 1,250 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening l Night Daily Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Site Data Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 1.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 61.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (in fee() Autos: 56.210 Medium Trucks: 55.968 Heavy Trucks: 55.862 FHWA Noise Model Cakulations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: 69.34 77.62 82.14 -0.98 -18.22 -22.18 -0.87 -0.84 -0.83 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20 0.19 0.12 0.01 -6.720 -6.160 -5.100 -9.720 -9.160 -8.100 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 66.3 57.4 57.9 64.4 55.9 56.5 62.6 49.5 47.5 56.6 48.0 48.7 65.2 56.4 57.1 65.8 56.6 57.2 67.3 65.5 63.0 57.7 66.3 66.8 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 56.6 48.2 49.8 54.7 46.7 48.4 52.9 40.3 39.4 46.9 38.8 40.6 55.5 47.3 49.0 56.1 47.5 49.1 57.9 56.1 53.3 48.3 56.9 57.4 Monday, November 11, 2019 223 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012 Scenario: Backyard No Wall Road Name: Madison Street Lot No: Planning Area VIII-LDR Project Name: The Wave Job Number:: 12462 Analyst: B. Lawson SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Slte Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 20,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Peak Hour Volume: 2,000 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening l Night Daily Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Site Data Barrier Height: 0.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 1.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrer: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 61.0 feet Barrer Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Autos: 56.919 Medium Trucks: 56.763 Heavy Trucks: 56778 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Baffler Afton Berm Atten Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: 69.34 77.62 82.14 1.06 -16.18 -20.13 -0.95 -0.93 -0.93 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20 -0.95 -1.15 -1.69 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 68.3 59.3 59.9 66.4 57.8 58.5 64.6 51.4 49.4 58.5 49.9 50.7 67.2 58.4 59.0 67.8 58.6 59.1 69.3 67.5 64.9 59.7 68.2 68.8 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 68.3 59.3 59.9 66.4 57.8 58.5 64.6 51.4 49.4 58.5 49.9 50.7 67.2 58.4 59.0 67.8 58.6 59.1 69.3 67.5 64.9 59.7 68.2 68.8 Monday, November 11, 2019 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012 Scenario: Backyard With Wall Road Name: Madison Street Lot No: Planning Area VIII-LDR Project Name: The Wave Job Number: 12462 Analyst: B. Lawson SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Average Daily Traffic (Aril): 20,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Peak Hour Volume: 2,000 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening l Night Daily Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Site Data Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 1.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 61.0 feet Barrer Distance to Observer: 10.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (in fee() Autos: 56.210 Medium Trucks: 55.968 Heavy Trucks: 55.862 FHWA Noise Model Cakulations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Atten Berm Atten Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: 69.34 77.62 82.14 1.06 -16.18 -20.13 -0.87 -0.84 -0.83 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20 0.19 0.12 0.01 -6720 -6.160 -5.100 -9.720 -9.160 -8.100 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 68.3 59.4 60.0 66.4 57.9 58.6 64.7 51.5 49.5 58.6 50.0 50.8 67.2 58.5 59.1 67.8 58.7 59.3 69.4 67.6 65.0 59.8 68.3 68.8 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 58.6 50.2 51.9 56.7 48.7 50.5 55.0 42.4 41.4 48.9 40.8 42.7 57.5 49.3 51.0 58.1 49.5 51.2 59.9 58.2 55.4 50.3 58.9 59.4 Monday, November 11, 2019 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012 Scenario: First Floor With Wall Road Name: Avenue 58 Lot No: Planning Area VIII-LDR Project Name: The Wave Job Number: 12462 Analyst: B. Lawson SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Peak Hour Volume: 1,250 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening l Night Daily Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Site Data Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 1.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrer. 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 71.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 20.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Autos: 66.185 Medium Trucks: 65.943 Heavy Trucks: 65.837 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Row Distance Finite Road Fresnel Baffler Afton Berm Alton Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: 69.34 77.62 82.14 -0.98 -18.22 -22.18 -1.93 -1.91 -1.90 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20 0.20 0.11 0.00 -6.800 -6.080 -4.900 -9.800 -9.080 -7.900 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 65.2 56.3 56.9 63.3 54.8 55.4 61.6 48.4 46.4 55.5 46.9 47.7 64.1 55.3 56.0 64.7 55.6 56.1 66.3 64.5 61.9 56.7 65.2 65.7 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 55.4 47.2 49.0 53.5 45.7 47.5 51.8 39.3 38.5 45.7 37.8 39.8 54.3 46.3 48.1 54.9 46.5 48.2 56.8 55.0 52.2 47.2 55.8 56.3 Monday, November 11, 2019 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012 Scenario: Second Floor With Wall Road Name: Avenue 58 Lot No: Planning Area VIII-LDR Project Name: The Wave Job Number: 12462 Analyst: B. Lawson SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 12,500 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Peak Hour Volume: 1,250 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening l Night Daily Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Site Data Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 1.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 71.0 feet Barrier Distance to Observer: 20.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 14.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance an feet) Autos: 68.780 Medium Trucks: 68.350 Heavy Trucks: 67.607 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel BarHerAften Berm Alton Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: 69.34 77.62 82.14 -0.98 -18.22 -22.18 -2.18 -2.14 -2.07 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20 -0.51 -0.70 -1.30 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 65.0 56.1 56.7 63.1 54.6 55.3 61.3 48.2 46.2 55.3 46.6 47.5 63.9 55.1 55.8 64.5 55.3 56.0 66.0 64.2 61.6 56.4 65.0 65.5 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barter attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: 65.0 63.1 Medium Trucks: 56.1 54.6 Heavy Trucks: 56.7 55.3 61.3 48.2 46.2 55.3 46.6 47.5 63.9 55.1 55.8 64.5 55.3 56.0 Vehicle Noise: 66.0 64.2 61.6 56.4 65.0 65.5 Monday, November 11, 2019 224 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012 Scenario: First Floor With Wall Road Name: Madison Street Lot No: Planning Area VIII-LDR Project Name: The Wave Job Number:: 12462 Analyst: B. Lawson SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Average Daily Traffic (Adt): 20,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Peak Hour Volume: 2,000 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening l Night Daily Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Site Data Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 1.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrer: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 71.0 feet Barrer Distance to Observer: 20.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 5.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Autos: 66.185 Medium Trucks: 65.943 Heavy Trucks: 65.837 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel Barrier Afton Berm Alton Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: 69.34 77.62 82.14 1.06 -16.18 -20.13 -1.93 -1.91 -1.90 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20 0.20 0.11 0.00 -6.800 -6.080 -4.900 -9.800 -9.080 -7.900 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 67.3 58.3 58.9 65.4 56.8 57.5 63.6 50.5 48.5 57.6 48.9 49.7 66.2 57.4 58.1 66.8 57.6 58.2 68.3 66.5 63.9 58.7 67.3 67.8 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 57.5 49.3 51.0 55.6 47.7 49.6 53.8 41.4 40.6 47.8 39.8 41.8 56.4 48.3 50.2 57.0 48.5 50.3 58.9 57.1 54.2 49.3 57.8 58.3 Monday, November 11, 2019 FHWA-RD-77-108 HIGHWAY NOISE PREDICTION MODEL (CALVENO) - 10/1/2012 Scenario: Second Floor With Wall Road Name: Madison Street Lot No: Planning Area VIII-LDR Project Name: The Wave Job Number: 12462 Analyst: B. Lawson SITE SPECIFIC INPUT DATA NOISE MODEL INPUTS Highway Data Site Conditions (Hard = 10, Soft = 15) Average Daily Traffic (Aril): 20,000 vehicles Peak Hour Percentage: 10% Peak Hour Volume: 2,000 vehicles Vehicle Speed: 45 mph Near/Far Lane Distance: 45 feet Autos: 15 Medium Trucks (2 Axles): 15 Heavy Trucks (3+ Axles): 15 Vehicle Mix VehicleType Day Evening l Night Daily Autos: 77.5% 12.9% 9.6% 97.42% Medium Trucks: 84.8% 4.9% 10.3% 1.84% Heavy Trucks: 86.5% 2.7% 10.8% 0.74% Site Data Barrier Height: 6.0 feet Barrier Type (0 -Wall, 1 -Berm): 1.0 Centerline Dist. to Barrier: 51.0 feet Centerline Dist. to Observer: 71.0 feet Barrer Distance to Observer: 20.0 feet Observer Height (Above Pad): 14.0 feet Pad Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Elevation: 0.0 feet Barrier Elevation: 0.0 feet Road Grade: 0.0% Noise Source Elevations (in feet) Autos: 0.000 Medium Trucks: 2297 Heavy Trucks: 8.006 Grade Adjustment: 0.0 Lane Equivalent Distance (in feet) Autos: 68.780 Medium Trucks: 68.350 Heavy Trucks: 67.607 FHWA Noise Model Calculations VehicleType REMEL Traffic Flow Distance Finite Road Fresnel BarrierAften Berm Alton Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: 69.34 77.62 82.14 1.06 -16.18 -20.13 -2.18 -2.14 -2.07 -1.20 -1.20 -1.20 -0.51 -0.70 -1.30 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Unmitigated Noise Levels (without Topo and barrier attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 67.0 58.1 58.7 65.1 56.6 57.3 63.4 50.2 48.3 57.3 48.7 49.5 65.9 57.1 57.9 66.5 57.4 58.0 68.1 66.3 63.7 58.5 67.0 67.5 Mitigated Noise Levels (with Topo and barter attenuation) VehicleType Leq Peak Hour Leq Day Leq Evening Leq Night Ldn CNEL Autos: Medium Trucks: Heavy Trucks: Vehicle Noise: 67.0 58.1 58.7 65.1 56.6 57.3 63.4 50.2 48.3 57.3 48.7 49.5 65.9 57.1 57.9 66.5 57.4 58.0 68.1 66.3 63.7 58.5 67.0 67.5 Monday, November 11, 2019 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis APPENDIX 10.1: CADNAA OPERATIONAL NOISE MODEL INPUTS 12642-10 Noise Study 225 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 226 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS 13103 CadnaA Noise Prediction Model: 12642 7.cna Date: 22.04.20 Analyst: B. Lawson Receiver Noise Levels Name M. ID Level Lr Limit. Value Land Use Height Coordinates Day Evening Night Day Night CNEL Day Night CNEL Type Auto Noise Type 6558236.55 X Y Z (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) Day Evening Night (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) RECEIVERS 63.3 R1 46.6 40.8 48.3 65.0 50.0 0.0 2169158.06 5.00 0.00 5.00 a 6559701.83 2172082.13 5.00 RECEIVERS 57.8 R2 46.5 44.8 51.3 65.0 50.0 0.0 0.00 5.00 a 6561160.17 2172103.84 5.00 RECEIVERS 43.4 R3 43.8 41.5 48.1 65.0 50.0 0.0 6558385.44 5.00 a 6561607.22 2172116.86 5.00 RECEIVERS 54.8 R4 43.0 39.9 46.7 65.0 50.0 0.0 6558435.14 2169103.86 5.00 5.00 a 6561919.72 2171422.41 5.00 RECEIVERS 2169074.26 R5 42.1 36.7 44.1 65.0 50.0 0.0 5.00 0.00 5.00 a 6561963.81 2170753.38 5.00 RECEIVERS 0.00 R6 52.2 30.6 49.4 65.0 50.0 0.0 5.00 a 6561014.44 2167755.55 5.00 RECEIVERS R7 46.0 27.9 43.5 65.0 50.0 0.0 6558634.64 2168849.11 5.00 a 6560134.29 2166770.74 5.00 RECEIVERS 6558656.15 R8 47.0 22.2 44.1 65.0 50.0 0.0 2168755.03 5.00 0.00 5.00 a 6559827.00 2166505.11 5.00 RECEIVERS 5.00 R9 41.5 22.5 38.9 65.0 50.0 0.0 0.00 5.00 a 6556013.28 2170127.57 5.00 RECEIVERS R10 39.8 30.4 39.5 65.0 50.0 0.0 6558717.33 5.00 a 6557185.16 2172188.76 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P1 58.5 31.4 55.6 65.0 50.0 0.0 6559075.57 2168333.49 5.00 5.00 a 6558248.54 2169368.52 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS 2168156.56 P2 55.4 33.6 52.6 65.0 50.0 0.0 5.00 0.00 5.00 a 6560358.05 2168812.35 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS 0.00 P3 61.2 29.6 58.2 65.0 50.0 0.0 5.00 a 6558335.40 2168327.62 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P4 53.9 22.3 50.9 65.0 50.0 0.0 6559556.61 2167919.05 5.00 a 6559349.69 2167313.33 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS 6559583.34 P5 55.0 31.8 52.2 65.0 50.0 0.0 5.00 a 6560520.02 2168225.59 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P6 54.1 35.0 51.4 65.0 50.0 0.0 5.00 a 6559481.73 2169654.00 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P7 51.8 36.6 49.7 65.0 50.0 0.0 5.00 a 6560454.00 2169587.98 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P8 53.7 52.0 58.6 65.0 50.0 0.0 5.00 a 6560808.11 2171442.51 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P9 62.4 31.5 59.4 65.0 50.0 0.0 5.00 a 6558690.22 2168964.96 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P10 64.5 30.4 61.6 65.0 50.0 0.0 5.00 a 6559589.56 2167959.31 5.00 Area Source(s) ID Result. PWL Result. PWL" Lw / Li Operating Time Moving Pt. Src Height y Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Type Value Day Special Night Number 6558236.55 2169133.37 (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) 2169142.54 5.00 (min) (min) (min) Day Evening Night (ft) WAVE 112.3 112.3 112.3 63.3 63.3 63.3 Lw" 63.3 900.00 0.00 0.00 2169158.06 5.00 0.00 5 POOL 103.3 103.3 103.3 57.8 57.8 57.8 Lw" 57.8 900.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5 GAME 84.3 84.3 84.3 43.4 43.4 43.4 Lw" 43.4 900.00 0.00 0.00 6558385.44 5 COMMERCIAL 99.6 99.6 99.6 54.8 54.8 54.8 Lw" 54.8 900.00 0.00 540.00 6558435.14 2169103.86 5.00 5 Name Height Coordinates Begin End x y z Ground (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) AREASOURCE 5.00 a 6558236.55 2169133.37 5.00 0.00 6558251.42 2169142.54 5.00 0.00 6558267.31 2169149.78 5.00 0.00 6558283.98 2169154.98 5.00 0.00 6558301.16 2169158.06 5.00 0.00 6558318.60 2169158.98 5.00 0.00 6558336.02 2169157.71 5.00 0.00 6558353.14 2169154.28 5.00 0.00 6558369.70 2169148.74 5.00 0.00 6558385.44 2169141.18 5.00 0.00 6558400.12 2169131.72 5.00 0.00 6558435.14 2169103.86 5.00 0.00 6558468.72 2169074.26 5.00 0.00 6558500.75 2169043.00 5.00 0.00 6558531.16 2169010.15 5.00 0.00 6558559.87 2168975.82 5.00 0.00 6558586.81 2168940.07 5.00 0.00 6558611.51 2168895.01 5.00 0.00 6558634.64 2168849.11 5.00 0.00 6558656.15 2168802.43 5.00 0.00 6558676.02 2168755.03 5.00 0.00 6558680.23 2168738.82 5.00 0.00 6558686.60 2168723.34 5.00 0.00 6558695.01 2168708.86 5.00 0.00 6558705.32 2168695.66 5.00 0.00 6558717.33 2168683.99 5.00 0.00 6558897.00 2168509.30 5.00 0.00 6559075.57 2168333.49 5.00 0.00 6559253.04 2168156.56 5.00 0.00 6559429.40 2167978.53 5.00 0.00 6559452.47 2167962.10 5.00 0.00 6559476.93 2167947.83 5.00 0.00 6559502.58 2167935.84 5.00 0.00 6559529.22 2167926.22 5.00 0.00 6559556.61 2167919.05 5.00 0.00 6559583.34 2167909.42 5.00 0.00 Urban Crossroads, Inc. 227 Name Height Coordinates Absorption Begin End x y z Ground (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) End x y 6559609.25 2167897.75 5.00 0.00 6559634.18 2167884.12 5.00 0.00 (ft) (ft) (ft) 6559657.98 2167868.61 5.00 0.00 BARRIERS00001 6559680.52 2167851.31 5.00 0.00 a 6556068.34 2169655.74 6559714.17 2167825.86 5.00 0.00 6559746.60 2167798.87 5.00 0.00 6556072.25 2169787.25 6559777.72 2167770.39 5.00 0.00 6559807.49 2167740.49 5.00 0.00 6556087.88 2170034.64 6559835.82 2167709.23 5.00 0.00 6559850.27 2167695.76 5.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170198.70 6559863.14 2167680.78 5.00 0.00 6559874.29 2167664.48 5.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170295.06 6559883.58 2167647.06 5.00 0.00 6559890.90 2167628.71 5.00 0.00 6556056.63 2170382.30 6559896.15 2167609.68 5.00 0.00 6559899.29 2167590.18 5.00 0.00 6555961.57 2170490.37 6559900.26 2167570.45 5.00 0.00 6559897.10 2167551.51 5.00 0.00 6559892.16 2167532.96 5.00 0.00 6559885.50 2167514.95 5.00 0.00 6559877.15 2167497.66 5.00 0.00 6559867.21 2167481.24 5.00 0.00 6559799.89 2167417.19 5.00 0.00 6559731.74 2167354.02 5.00 0.00 6559710.33 2167328.19 5.00 0.00 6559687.16 2167303.92 5.00 0.00 6559662.35 2167281.33 5.00 0.00 6559117.12 2167821.00 5.00 0.00 6558573.02 2168361.80 5.00 0.00 6558030.04 2168903.73 5.00 0.00 AREASOURCE 5.00 a 6560031.78 2168962.36 5.00 0.00 6560181.94 2168783.47 5.00 0.00 6560029.61 2168652.28 5.00 0.00 6559914.14 2168522.71 5.00 0.00 6559575.47 2168140.72 5.00 0.00 6559551.37 2168137.40 5.00 0.00 6559493.20 2167947.91 5.00 0.00 6559453.95 2167969.83 5.00 0.00 6559409.39 2168010.75 5.00 0.00 6558982.88 2168435.44 5.00 0.00 6559100.09 2168547.96 5.00 0.00 6559287.09 2168386.72 5.00 0.00 6559482.36 2168622.99 5.00 0.00 6559599.72 2168519.46 5.00 0.00 6559843.67 2168794.31 5.00 0.00 AREASOURCE 5.00 a 6558439.55 2169176.11 5.00 0.00 6558437.01 2169554.16 5.00 0.00 6558495.37 2169546.54 5.00 0.00 6558551.19 2169559.23 5.00 0.00 6558749.09 2169412.07 5.00 0.00 6558749.09 2169351.18 5.00 0.00 6558764.32 2169280.14 5.00 0.00 6558794.76 2169216.70 5.00 0.00 6558596.86 2169011.19 5.00 0.00 AREASOURCE 5.00 a 6560600.13 2171905.47 5.00 0.00 6561327.49 2171892.11 5.00 0.00 6561350.10 2171875.67 5.00 0.00 6561362.42 2171617.81 5.00 0.00 6561376.81 2171481.17 5.00 0.00 6561395.30 2171370.22 5.00 0.00 6561237.09 2171332.21 5.00 0.00 6561169.28 2171311.66 5.00 0.00 6561164.15 2171339.40 5.00 0.00 6560600.13 2171698.97 5.00 0.00 Barrier(s) Name M. ID Absorption Z -Ext. Cantilever Height Coordinates left right horz. vert. Begin End x y z Ground (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) BARRIERS BARRIERS00001 6.00 a 6556068.34 2169655.74 6.00 0.00 6556072.25 2169787.25 6.00 0.00 6556087.88 2170034.64 6.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170198.70 6.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170295.06 6.00 0.00 6556056.63 2170382.30 6.00 0.00 6555961.57 2170490.37 6.00 0.00 Urban Crossroads, Inc. 228 Name M. ID Absorption Z -Ext. Cantilever Height Coordinates y left right (ft) horz. vert. Begin End x y z Ground 6558996.92 2167822.26 (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 6560022.45 2167364.58 6560089.35 2167366.17 6555886.05 2170543.76 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00002 2166545.88 6558818.29 6.00 a 6557284.27 2172169.91 6.00 0.00 6557254.76 2172131.72 6.00 0.00 6557208.75 2172123.04 6.00 0.00 6557131.50 2172067.48 6.00 0.00 6557060.31 2172050.99 6.00 0.00 6556932.71 2172050.99 6.00 0.00 6556792.95 2172051.86 6.00 0.00 6556711.36 2172079.64 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00003 6.00 a 6557153.20 2172059.67 6.00 0.00 6557222.64 2172046.65 6.00 0.00 6557325.94 2172044.91 6.00 0.00 6557427.50 2172050.12 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00004 6.00 a 6561351.48 2172027.86 6.00 0.00 6561102.87 2172020.92 6.00 0.00 6561104.95 2172050.09 6.00 0.00 6560961.89 2172050.78 6.00 0.00 6560757.73 2172048.00 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00005 6.00 a 6561761.78 2172032.47 6.00 0.00 6561668.72 2172044.27 6.00 0.00 6561565.95 2172042.88 6.00 0.00 6561527.75 2172067.19 6.00 0.00 6561507.61 2172141.49 6.00 0.00 6561504.14 2172241.49 6.00 0.00 6561506.92 2172305.38 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00006 6.00 a 6562036.78 2171815.10 6.00 0.00 6562077.75 2171758.85 6.00 0.00 6561990.25 2171672.05 6.00 0.00 6561978.45 2171678.30 6.00 0.00 6561885.39 2171597.74 6.00 0.00 6561777.06 2171550.52 6.00 0.00 6561777.75 2171540.80 6.00 0.00 6561698.58 2171485.24 6.00 0.00 6561619.42 2171384.55 6.00 0.00 6561618.03 2171366.49 6.00 0.00 6561622.89 2171360.94 6.00 0.00 6561606.92 2171297.74 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00007 6.00 a 6561650.93 2171132.10 6.00 0.00 6561698.67 2171027.94 6.00 0.00 6561730.14 2170950.90 6.00 0.00 6561778.97 2170829.37 6.00 0.00 6561832.14 2170754.50 6.00 0.00 6561854.92 2170726.29 6.00 0.00 6561861.43 2170734.97 6.00 0.00 6561913.52 2170592.82 6.00 0.00 6561937.39 2170571.12 6.00 0.00 6561958.00 2170535.32 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00008 6.00 a 6561606.92 2171297.74 6.00 0.00 6561606.67 2171224.32 6.00 0.00 6561616.63 2171169.23 6.00 0.00 6561631.23 2171167.24 6.00 0.00 6561650.93 2171132.10 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00009 6.00 a 6560093.69 2166604.65 6.00 0.00 6560092.73 2166983.08 6.00 0.00 Ground Absorption(s) Name M. ID G Coordinates x y (ft) (ft) GROUND 0 1.0 6558802.37 2167864.72 6558996.92 2167822.26 6559662.48 2167250.25 6559909.37 2167450.59 6560022.45 2167364.58 6560089.35 2167366.17 6560082.98 2166545.88 6559426.75 2166545.88 6558818.29 2166794.36 Urban Crossroads, Inc. 229 Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 230 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis APPENDIX 11.1: CADNAA CONSTRUCTION NOISE MODEL INPUTS 12642-10 Noise Study 231 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS Coral Mountain Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis This page intentionally left blank 12642-10 Noise Study 232 [^�► URBAN CROSSROADS 13103 CadnaA Noise Prediction Model: 12642 ConstructionPl.cna Date: 22.04.20 Analyst: B. Lawson Receiver Noise Levels Name M. ID Level Lr Limit. Value Land Use Height Coordinates Day Evening Night Day Night CNEL Day Night CNEL Type Auto Noise Type 6557934.33 X Y Z (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) Day Evening Night (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) RECEIVERS 75.3 R1 65.6 65.6 72.3 85.0 0.0 0.0 2169563.14 8.00 0.00 5.00 a 6559701.83 2172082.13 5.00 RECEIVERS 75.3 R2 65.8 65.8 72.4 85.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 5.00 a 6561160.17 2172103.84 5.00 RECEIVERS R3 63.0 63.0 69.7 85.0 0.0 0.0 6559056.43 5.00 a 6561607.22 2172116.86 5.00 RECEIVERS R4 62.3 62.3 69.0 85.0 0.0 0.0 6559800.77 2169487.59 8.00 5.00 a 6561919.72 2171422.41 5.00 RECEIVERS 2169423.23 R5 61.6 61.6 68.3 85.0 0.0 0.0 8.00 0.00 5.00 a 6561963.81 2170753.38 5.00 RECEIVERS 0.00 R6 71.3 71.3 78.0 85.0 0.0 0.0 5.00 a 6561014.44 2167755.55 5.00 RECEIVERS R7 72.5 72.5 79.1 85.0 0.0 0.0 6560200.92 2169370.06 5.00 a 6560134.29 2166770.74 5.00 RECEIVERS 6560248.49 R8 76.5 76.5 83.2 85.0 0.0 0.0 2169328.08 8.00 0.00 5.00 a 6559827.00 2166505.11 5.00 RECEIVERS 8.00 R9 58.7 58.7 65.4 85.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 5.00 a 6556013.28 2170127.57 5.00 RECEIVERS R10 58.0 58.0 64.6 85.0 0.0 0.0 6560861.71 5.00 a 6557185.16 2172188.76 5.00 Area Source(s) ID Result. PWL Result. PWL" Lw / Li Operating Time Moving Pt. Src Height y Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Type Value Day Special Night Number 6557934.33 2168936.33 (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) 2169202.16 8.00 (min) (min) (min) Day Evening Night (ft) ABSORPTION00001 132.1 132.1 132.1 75.3 75.3 75.3 Lw" 75.3 6558555.54 2169563.14 8.00 0.00 8 ABSORPTION00002 120.2 120.2 120.2 75.3 75.3 75.3 Lw" 75.3 6558785.00 2169484.79 8.00 0.00 8 Name Height Coordinates Begin End x y z Ground (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) ABSORPTION 8.00 a 6557934.33 2168936.33 8.00 0.00 6558256.13 2169202.16 8.00 0.00 6558429.62 2169196.57 8.00 0.00 6558438.01 2169563.14 8.00 0.00 6558555.54 2169563.14 8.00 0.00 6558745.82 2169409.23 8.00 0.00 6558785.00 2169484.79 8.00 0.00 6558880.14 2169568.73 8.00 0.00 6558936.10 2169599.52 8.00 0.00 6559056.43 2169599.52 8.00 0.00 6559702.83 2169543.55 8.00 0.00 6559800.77 2169487.59 8.00 0.00 6559823.15 2169423.23 8.00 0.00 6559828.75 2169344.87 8.00 0.00 6559825.95 2169269.32 8.00 0.00 6559851.13 2169202.16 8.00 0.00 6559915.49 2169115.42 8.00 0.00 6560150.55 2169302.90 8.00 0.00 6560200.92 2169370.06 8.00 0.00 6560248.49 2169336.48 8.00 0.00 6560878.10 2169328.08 8.00 0.00 6560880.89 2168919.54 8.00 0.00 6560879.41 2168899.56 8.00 0.00 6560875.68 2168879.87 8.00 0.00 6560869.76 2168860.73 8.00 0.00 6560861.71 2168842.39 8.00 0.00 6560851.64 2168825.07 8.00 0.00 6560839.68 2168809.00 8.00 0.00 6560825.98 2168794.38 8.00 0.00 6560810.71 2168781.40 8.00 0.00 6560794.08 2168770.22 8.00 0.00 6560776.30 2168761.00 8.00 0.00 6560757.58 2168753.84 8.00 0.00 6560738.18 2168748.84 8.00 0.00 6560547.90 2168751.64 8.00 0.00 6560447.16 2168734.85 8.00 0.00 6560312.85 2168639.71 8.00 0.00 6560421.98 2168505.40 8.00 0.00 6560433.99 2168479.82 8.00 0.00 6560443.75 2168453.31 8.00 0.00 6560451.21 2168426.06 8.00 0.00 6560456.30 2168398.27 8.00 0.00 6560458.99 2168370.15 8.00 0.00 6560459.25 2168341.90 8.00 0.00 6560457.09 2168313.73 8.00 0.00 6560452.52 2168285.85 8.00 0.00 6560445.57 2168258.46 8.00 0.00 6560436.30 2168231.78 8.00 0.00 Urban Crossroads, Inc. 233 Name Height Coordinates Absorption Begin End x y z Ground (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) End x y 6560424.78 2168205.98 8.00 0.00 6560262.48 2168029.69 8.00 0.00 (ft) (ft) (ft) 6560237.74 2168020.87 8.00 0.00 BARRIERS00001 6560213.84 2168009.97 8.00 0.00 a 6556068.34 2169655.74 6560190.95 2167997.09 8.00 0.00 6560169.23 2167982.32 8.00 0.00 6556072.25 2169787.25 6560148.85 2167965.76 8.00 0.00 6560129.94 2167947.52 8.00 0.00 6556087.88 2170034.64 6560112.65 2167927.75 8.00 0.00 6560097.09 2167906.59 8.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170198.70 6560083.39 2167884.18 8.00 0.00 6560091.78 2166546.61 8.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170295.06 6559428.60 2166546.61 8.00 0.00 6558812.98 2166798.46 8.00 0.00 6556056.63 2170382.30 6558790.59 2167912.16 8.00 0.00 ABSORPTION 8.00 a 6560597.19 2171907.41 8.00 0.00 6555961.57 2170490.37 6561333.34 2171899.09 8.00 0.00 6561352.76 2171878.74 8.00 0.00 6555886.05 2170543.76 6561357.38 2171666.04 8.00 0.00 BARRIERS00002 6561372.18 2171550.44 8.00 0.00 a 6557284.27 2172169.91 6561373.10 2171506.97 8.00 0.00 6561396.22 2171365.48 8.00 0.00 6557254.76 2172131.72 6561170.57 2171310.91 8.00 0.00 6561165.02 2171342.36 8.00 0.00 6557208.75 2172123.04 6560599.04 2171700.26 8.00 0.00 Barrier(s) Name M. ID Absorption Z -Ext. Cantilever Height Coordinates left right horz. vert. Begin End x y z Ground (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) BARRIERS BARRIERS00001 6.00 a 6556068.34 2169655.74 6.00 0.00 6556072.25 2169787.25 6.00 0.00 6556087.88 2170034.64 6.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170198.70 6.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170295.06 6.00 0.00 6556056.63 2170382.30 6.00 0.00 6555961.57 2170490.37 6.00 0.00 6555886.05 2170543.76 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00002 6.00 a 6557284.27 2172169.91 6.00 0.00 6557254.76 2172131.72 6.00 0.00 6557208.75 2172123.04 6.00 0.00 6557131.50 2172067.48 6.00 0.00 6557060.31 2172050.99 6.00 0.00 6556932.71 2172050.99 6.00 0.00 6556792.95 2172051.86 6.00 0.00 6556711.36 2172079.64 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00003 6.00 a 6557153.20 2172059.67 6.00 0.00 6557222.64 2172046.65 6.00 0.00 6557325.94 2172044.91 6.00 0.00 6557427.50 2172050.12 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00004 6.00 a 6561351.48 2172027.86 6.00 0.00 6561102.87 2172020.92 6.00 0.00 6561104.95 2172050.09 6.00 0.00 6560961.89 2172050.78 6.00 0.00 6560757.73 2172048.00 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00005 6.00 a 6561761.78 2172032.47 6.00 0.00 6561668.72 2172044.27 6.00 0.00 6561565.95 2172042.88 6.00 0.00 6561527.75 2172067.19 6.00 0.00 6561507.61 2172141.49 6.00 0.00 6561504.14 2172241.49 6.00 0.00 6561506.92 2172305.38 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00006 6.00 a 6562036.78 2171815.10 6.00 0.00 6562077.75 2171758.85 6.00 0.00 6561990.25 2171672.05 6.00 0.00 6561978.45 2171678.30 6.00 0.00 6561885.39 2171597.74 6.00 0.00 6561777.06 2171550.52 6.00 0.00 6561777.75 2171540.80 6.00 0.00 6561698.58 2171485.24 6.00 0.00 6561619.42 2171384.55 6.00 0.00 6561618.03 2171366.49 6.00 0.00 6561622.89 2171360.94 6.00 0.00 6561606.92 2171297.74 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00007 6.00 a 6561650.93 2171132.10 6.00 0.00 6561698.67 2171027.94 6.00 0.00 Urban Crossroads, Inc. 234 Name M. ID Absorption Z -Ext. Cantilever Height Coordinates left right horz. vert. Begin End x y z Ground (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 6561730.14 2170950.90 6.00 0.00 6561778.97 2170829.37 6.00 0.00 6561832.14 2170754.50 6.00 0.00 6561854.92 2170726.29 6.00 0.00 6561861.43 2170734.97 6.00 0.00 6561913.52 2170592.82 6.00 0.00 6561937.39 2170571.12 6.00 0.00 6561958.00 2170535.32 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00008 6.00 a 6561606.92 2171297.74 6.00 0.00 6561606.67 2171224.32 6.00 0.00 6561616.63 2171169.23 6.00 0.00 6561631.23 2171167.24 6.00 0.00 6561650.93 2171132.10 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00009 6.00 a 6560093.69 2166604.65 6.00 0.00 6560092.73 2166983.08 6.00 0.00 Urban Crossroads, Inc. 235 13103 CadnaA Noise Prediction Model: 12642 ConstructionP23.cna Date: 22.04.20 Analyst: B. Lawson Receiver Noise Levels Name M. ID Level Lr Limit. Value Land Use Height Coordinates Day Evening Night Day Night CNEL Day Night CNEL Type Auto Noise Type 6561352.29 X Y Z (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) Day Evening Night (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) RECEIVERS 0.0 R1 74.8 74.8 81.5 85.0 0.0 0.0 2171917.28 8.00 0.00 5.00 a 6559701.83 2172082.13 5.00 RECEIVERS 75.3 R2 69.9 69.9 76.6 85.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 5.00 a 6561160.17 2172103.84 5.00 RECEIVERS R3 67.9 67.9 74.6 85.0 0.0 0.0 6561733.46 5.00 a 6561607.22 2172116.86 5.00 RECEIVERS R4 68.8 68.8 75.5 85.0 0.0 0.0 6561914.02 2170206.77 8.00 5.00 a 6561919.72 2171422.41 5.00 RECEIVERS 2169949.83 R5 70.6 70.6 77.2 85.0 0.0 0.0 8.00 0.00 5.00 a 6561963.81 2170753.38 5.00 RECEIVERS 0.00 R6 75.8 75.8 82.5 85.0 0.0 0.0 5.00 a 6561014.44 2167755.55 5.00 RECEIVERS R7 68.6 68.6 75.3 85.0 0.0 0.0 6561983.46 2168387.33 5.00 a 6560134.29 2166770.74 5.00 RECEIVERS 6561858.46 R8 67.5 67.5 74.2 85.0 0.0 0.0 2167845.66 8.00 0.00 5.00 a 6559827.00 2166505.11 5.00 RECEIVERS 8.00 R9 63.7 63.7 70.3 85.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 5.00 a 6556013.28 2170127.57 5.00 RECEIVERS R10 64.0 64.0 70.7 85.0 0.0 0.0 6560093.22 5.00 a 6557185.16 2172188.76 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P1 82.8 82.8 89.5 85.0 0.0 0.0 6560097.09 2167906.59 8.00 5.00 a 6558248.54 2169368.52 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS 2167927.75 P2 76.8 76.8 83.4 85.0 0.0 0.0 8.00 0.00 5.00 a 6560358.05 2168812.35 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS 0.00 P3 82.3 82.3 89.0 85.0 0.0 0.0 5.00 a 6558335.40 2168327.62 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P4 70.6 70.6 77.3 85.0 0.0 0.0 6560237.74 2168020.87 5.00 a 6559349.69 2167313.33 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS 6560262.48 P5 82.5 82.5 89.1 85.0 0.0 0.0 2168205.98 8.00 0.00 5.00 a 6560520.02 2168225.59 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS 8.00 P6 82.9 82.9 89.5 85.0 0.0 0.0 5.00 a 6559481.73 2169654.00 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P7 83.2 83.2 89.9 85.0 0.0 0.0 5.00 a 6560454.00 2169587.98 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P8 83.1 83.1 89.8 85.0 0.0 0.0 5.00 a 6560808.11 2171442.51 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P9 75.3 75.3 82.0 85.0 0.0 0.0 5.00 a 6558690.22 2168964.96 5.00 PRJRECEIVERS P10 72.6 72.6 79.3 85.0 0.0 0.0 5.00 a 6559589.56 2167959.31 5.00 Area Source(s) ID Result. PWL Result. PWL" Lw / Li Operating Time Moving Pt. Src Height y Day Evening Night Day Evening Night Type Value Day Special Night Number 6561352.29 2171907.14 (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) (dBA) 2171917.28 0.00 (min) (min) (min) Day Evening Night (ft) P2P3CONSTRUCTION00002 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Lw" 6561351.77 2171917.28 8.00 0.00 0 P2P3CONSTRUCTION00002 135.7 135.7 135.7 75.3 75.3 75.3 Lw" 75.3 6561448.74 2171172.05 8.00 0.00 8 Name Height Coordinates Begin End x y z Ground (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) P2P3CONSTRUCTION 0.00 a 6561352.29 2171907.14 0.00 0.00 6561351.77 2171917.28 0.00 0.00 6561352.08 2171917.24 0.00 0.00 P2P3CONSTRUCTION 8.00 a 6561351.52 2171922.05 8.00 0.00 6561351.77 2171917.28 8.00 0.00 6561393.19 2171387.33 8.00 0.00 6561448.74 2171172.05 8.00 0.00 6561525.13 2170963.71 8.00 0.00 6561650.13 2170692.88 8.00 0.00 6561733.46 2170533.16 8.00 0.00 6561851.52 2170331.77 8.00 0.00 6561914.02 2170206.77 8.00 0.00 6562011.24 2169949.83 8.00 0.00 6562087.63 2169685.94 8.00 0.00 6562122.35 2169428.99 8.00 0.00 6562129.30 2169102.60 8.00 0.00 6562108.46 2168838.71 8.00 0.00 6562073.74 2168678.99 8.00 0.00 6561983.46 2168387.33 8.00 0.00 6561858.46 2168095.66 8.00 0.00 6561712.63 2167845.66 8.00 0.00 6561594.57 2167623.44 8.00 0.00 6561518.19 2167435.94 8.00 0.00 6561441.80 2167158.16 8.00 0.00 6561434.85 2167887.33 8.00 0.00 6560093.22 2167888.99 8.00 0.00 6560083.39 2167884.18 8.00 0.00 6560097.09 2167906.59 8.00 0.00 6560112.65 2167927.75 8.00 0.00 6560129.94 2167947.52 8.00 0.00 6560148.85 2167965.76 8.00 0.00 6560169.23 2167982.32 8.00 0.00 6560190.95 2167997.09 8.00 0.00 6560213.84 2168009.97 8.00 0.00 6560237.74 2168020.87 8.00 0.00 6560262.48 2168029.69 8.00 0.00 6560424.78 2168205.98 8.00 0.00 6560436.30 2168231.78 8.00 0.00 Urban Crossroads, Inc. 236 Name Height Coordinates Absorption Begin End x y z Ground (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) End x y 6560445.57 2168258.46 8.00 0.00 6560452.52 2168285.85 8.00 0.00 (ft) (ft) (ft) 6560457.09 2168313.73 8.00 0.00 BARRIERS00001 6560459.25 2168341.90 8.00 0.00 a 6556068.34 2169655.74 6560458.99 2168370.15 8.00 0.00 6560456.30 2168398.27 8.00 0.00 6556072.25 2169787.25 6560451.21 2168426.06 8.00 0.00 6560443.75 2168453.31 8.00 0.00 6556087.88 2170034.64 6560433.99 2168479.82 8.00 0.00 6560421.98 2168505.40 8.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170198.70 6560312.85 2168639.71 8.00 0.00 6560447.16 2168734.85 8.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170295.06 6560547.90 2168751.64 8.00 0.00 6560738.18 2168748.84 8.00 0.00 6556056.63 2170382.30 6560757.58 2168753.84 8.00 0.00 6560776.30 2168761.00 8.00 0.00 6555961.57 2170490.37 6560794.08 2168770.22 8.00 0.00 6560810.71 2168781.40 8.00 0.00 6555886.05 2170543.76 6560825.98 2168794.38 8.00 0.00 BARRIERS00002 6560839.68 2168809.00 8.00 0.00 a 6557284.27 2172169.91 6560851.64 2168825.07 8.00 0.00 6560861.71 2168842.39 8.00 0.00 6557254.76 2172131.72 6560869.76 2168860.73 8.00 0.00 6560875.68 2168879.87 8.00 0.00 6557208.75 2172123.04 6560879.41 2168899.56 8.00 0.00 6560880.89 2168919.54 8.00 0.00 6557131.50 2172067.48 6560878.10 2169328.08 8.00 0.00 6560248.49 2169336.48 8.00 0.00 6557060.31 2172050.99 6560200.92 2169370.06 8.00 0.00 6560150.55 2169302.90 8.00 0.00 6556932.71 2172050.99 6559915.49 2169115.42 8.00 0.00 6559851.13 2169202.16 8.00 0.00 6556792.95 2172051.86 6559825.95 2169269.32 8.00 0.00 6559828.75 2169344.87 8.00 0.00 6556711.36 2172079.64 6559823.15 2169423.23 8.00 0.00 BARRIERS00003 6559800.77 2169487.59 8.00 0.00 a 6557153.20 2172059.67 6559702.83 2169543.55 8.00 0.00 6559056.43 2169599.52 8.00 0.00 6557222.64 2172046.65 6558936.10 2169599.52 8.00 0.00 6558880.14 2169568.73 8.00 0.00 6558785.00 2169484.79 8.00 0.00 6558745.82 2169409.23 8.00 0.00 6558555.54 2169563.14 8.00 0.00 6558438.01 2169563.14 8.00 0.00 6558429.62 2169196.57 8.00 0.00 6558256.13 2169202.16 8.00 0.00 6557934.33 2168936.33 8.00 0.00 6558790.59 2167912.16 8.00 0.00 6558789.02 2167901.22 8.00 0.00 6557490.41 2167915.10 8.00 0.00 6557455.69 2170838.71 8.00 0.00 6559601.52 2170817.88 8.00 0.00 6559594.57 2171928.99 8.00 0.00 Barrier(s) Name M. ID Absorption Z -Ext. Cantilever Height Coordinates left right horz. vert. Begin End x y z Ground (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) BARRIERS BARRIERS00001 6.00 a 6556068.34 2169655.74 6.00 0.00 6556072.25 2169787.25 6.00 0.00 6556087.88 2170034.64 6.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170198.70 6.00 0.00 6556095.69 2170295.06 6.00 0.00 6556056.63 2170382.30 6.00 0.00 6555961.57 2170490.37 6.00 0.00 6555886.05 2170543.76 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00002 6.00 a 6557284.27 2172169.91 6.00 0.00 6557254.76 2172131.72 6.00 0.00 6557208.75 2172123.04 6.00 0.00 6557131.50 2172067.48 6.00 0.00 6557060.31 2172050.99 6.00 0.00 6556932.71 2172050.99 6.00 0.00 6556792.95 2172051.86 6.00 0.00 6556711.36 2172079.64 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00003 6.00 a 6557153.20 2172059.67 6.00 0.00 6557222.64 2172046.65 6.00 0.00 Urban Crossroads, Inc. 237 Name M. ID Absorption Z -Ext. Cantilever Height Coordinates left right horz. vert. Begin End x y z Ground (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) 6557325.94 2172044.91 6.00 0.00 6557427.50 2172050.12 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00004 6.00 a 6561351.48 2172027.86 6.00 0.00 6561102.87 2172020.92 6.00 0.00 6561104.95 2172050.09 6.00 0.00 6560961.89 2172050.78 6.00 0.00 6560757.73 2172048.00 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00005 6.00 a 6561761.78 2172032.47 6.00 0.00 6561668.72 2172044.27 6.00 0.00 6561565.95 2172042.88 6.00 0.00 6561527.75 2172067.19 6.00 0.00 6561507.61 2172141.49 6.00 0.00 6561504.14 2172241.49 6.00 0.00 6561506.92 2172305.38 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00006 6.00 a 6562036.78 2171815.10 6.00 0.00 6562077.75 2171758.85 6.00 0.00 6561990.25 2171672.05 6.00 0.00 6561978.45 2171678.30 6.00 0.00 6561885.39 2171597.74 6.00 0.00 6561777.06 2171550.52 6.00 0.00 6561777.75 2171540.80 6.00 0.00 6561698.58 2171485.24 6.00 0.00 6561619.42 2171384.55 6.00 0.00 6561618.03 2171366.49 6.00 0.00 6561622.89 2171360.94 6.00 0.00 6561606.92 2171297.74 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00007 6.00 a 6561650.93 2171132.10 6.00 0.00 6561698.67 2171027.94 6.00 0.00 6561730.14 2170950.90 6.00 0.00 6561778.97 2170829.37 6.00 0.00 6561832.14 2170754.50 6.00 0.00 6561854.92 2170726.29 6.00 0.00 6561861.43 2170734.97 6.00 0.00 6561913.52 2170592.82 6.00 0.00 6561937.39 2170571.12 6.00 0.00 6561958.00 2170535.32 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00008 6.00 a 6561606.92 2171297.74 6.00 0.00 6561606.67 2171224.32 6.00 0.00 6561616.63 2171169.23 6.00 0.00 6561631.23 2171167.24 6.00 0.00 6561650.93 2171132.10 6.00 0.00 BARRIERS BARRIERS00009 6.00 a 6560093.69 2166604.65 6.00 0.00 6560092.73 2166983.08 6.00 0.00 Urban Crossroads, Inc. 238