Loading...
2024 08 06 Councilta Qaigra - GF.M nf'the DFSERT - City Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City's web page: www.LaQuintaCA.gov CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY, AUGUST 6, 2024 3:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION 1 4:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION Members of the public may listen to this meeting by tuning -in live via www.laauintaca.aov/livemeetinas. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Fitzpatrick, McGarrey, Pena, Sanchez, and Mayor Evans PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda pursuant to the "Public Comments — Instructions" listed at the end of the agenda. The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION; PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 NAME OF CASE: CITY OF LA QUINTA v. SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ET AL. CASE NUMBER: PENDING CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 1 of 8 AUGUST 6, 2024 2. Added at Confirmation of Agenda pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2 (b)(2) [BROWN ACT] >>> CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION; PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 CASES NAMES AND NUMBERS — MULTIPLE (listed below) CASE NAME: CASE NUMBER SilverRock Development Company, LLC. 24-11647 SilverRock Lifestyle Residences, LLC 24-11648 SilverRock Lodging, LLC 24-11650 SilverRock Luxury Residences, LLC 24-11652 SilverRock Phase I, LLC 24-11654 RGC PA 789, LLC 24-11657 RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda pursuant to the "Public Comments — Instructions" listed at the end of the agenda. The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION AND REMEMBERANCE OF KATHERINE VOGTS FOR HER DEDICATION, KINDNESS, HEROISM, AND UNWAIVERING SPIRIT IN SERVING HER COMMUNITY CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. PAGE 1. APPROVE COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES DATED JULY 16, 2024 2. EXCUSE ABSENCE OF COMMISSIONER BATAVICK FROM THE AUGUST 14, 2024, FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING 3. ACCEPT ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POLO VILLAS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, TRACT MAP NO. 33085, LOCATED WEST OF MADISON STREET BETWEEN AVENUES 50 AND 52 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 of 8 AUGUST 6, 2024 4. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 FRED WARING DRIVE AND MISCELLANEOUS LOCATIONS PROJECT NO. 2024-12 5. APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE SILVERROCK TEMPORARY GOLF CART PATH PAVING PROJECT NO. 2024-13 6. AWARD CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE EISENHOWER BASIN SLOPE REPAIR PROJECT NO. 2023-22, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EISENHOWER DRIVE BETWEEN AVENIDA FERNANDO AND COACHELLA DRIVE 7. APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH RY+AO FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION YARD PROJECT NO. 2018-05 8. APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH RAINY DAY ROOFING FOR ON -CALL ROOFING SERVICES 9. APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH BMO BANK, N.A. FOR BANKING AND MERCHANT SERVICES 10. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED MAY 31, 2024 11. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED JULY 12, 19, AND 26, 2024 197 BUSINESS SESSION PAGE 1. RECEIVE AND FILE ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR 223 YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 STUDY SESSION — None PUBLIC HEARINGS — 5:00 p.m. or thereafter For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item; comments are limited to three (3) minutes (approximately 350 words). Any person may submit written comments to the City Council prior to the public hearing and/or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the project(s) at the time of the public hearing. If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 of 8 AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PLACEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS ON THE FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 PROPERTY TAX ROLL [RESOLUTION NO. 2024-032] 2. ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO 1) CERTIFY AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EA2017-0008, SCH# 2018011023) AND 2) APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 (TTM 37387); INTRODUCE ORDINANCES TO APPROVE 1) ZONE CHANGE 2017-0002, AND 2) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0001; PROJECT: TRAVERTINE - CONSISTING OF 1,200 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 45,000 SQUARE FOOT HOTEL WITH 100 VILLAS, SPA AND WELLNESS CENTER AND OTHER COMMERCIAL AND RECREATIONAL USES; CEQA: AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EA2017-0008, SCH# 2018011023) HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT; LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, WEST OF MADISON STREET, AND NORTH OF AVENUE 64 [RESOLUTION NOS. 2024-033 AND 2024-034; ORDINANCE NOS. 616 AND 617] DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS PAGE 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK - SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTAL QUARTERLY REPORT 1,109 APRIL - JUNE 2024 4. COMMUNITY SERVICES - QUARTERLY REPORT - APRIL - JUNE 2024 1,117 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT - SOUTHERN SPHERE OF INFLUENCE 1,127 OUTREACH UPDATE 6. FINANCE 7. PUBLIC SAFETY 8. PUBLIC WORKS MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 2. CVAG ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES COMMITTEE (Evans) 3. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. VISIT GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) 5. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT - COACHELLA VALLEY ENERGY COMMISSION (Evans) 6. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Evans) 7. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE (Evans) 8. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (Evans) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 of 8 AUGUST 6, 2024 9. GREATER CV CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Evans) 10. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE (Evans & Fitzpatrick) 11. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Evans & Sanchez) 12. DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & McGarrey) 13. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Pena) 14. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Fitzpatrick) 15. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 16. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT — ENERGY CONSUMERS ADVISORY COMMITTEE (McGarrey) 17. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (McGarrey) 18. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY POLICY COMMITTEE (McGarrey) 19. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RIVERSIDE COUNTY DIVISION (McGarrey) 20. CANNABIS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Pena & Sanchez) 21. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Pena) 22. CVAG HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Pena) 23. COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (Pena) 24. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Pena) 25. ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Sanchez) 26. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Sanchez) 27. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (Sanchez) 28. ART PURCHASE COMMITTEE (Sanchez & McGarrey) 29. CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY (Sanchez) 30. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL COUNCIL (Sanchez) 31. PALM SPRINGS AIRPORT COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 10, 1,133 2024 ADJOURNMENT ********************************* The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on September 17, 2024, at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chamber, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was posted on the City's website, near the entrance to the Council Chamber at 78495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin board at the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51321 Avenida Bermudas, on August 2, 2024. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5 of 8 AUGUST 6, 2024 DATED: August 2, 2024 MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices • Agenda packet materials are available for public inspection: 1) at the Clerk's Office at La Quinta City Hall, located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253; and 2) on the City's website at www.laquintaca.gov/councilagendas, in accordance with the Brown Act [Government Code § 54957.5; AB 2647 (Stats. 2022, Ch. 971)]. • The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's office at (760) 777-7123, 24- hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. • If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that 15 copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS - INSTRUCTIONS Members of the public may address the City Council on any matter listed or not listed on the agenda as follows: WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided either in -person during the meeting by submitting 15 copies to the City Clerk, it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting; or can be emailed in advance to CityClerkMail(a�_LaQuintaCA.gov, no later than 12:00 p.m., on the day of the meeting. Written public comments will be distributed to Council, made public, and will be incorporated into the public record of the meeting, but will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of public comments is asked to be reported. If written public comments are emailed, the email subject line must clearly state "Written Comments" and should include: 1) full name, 2) city of residence, and 3) subject matter. VERBAL PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided in -person during the meeting by completing a "Request to Speak" form and submitting it to the City Clerk; it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). Members of the public shall be called upon to speak by the Mayor. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 6 of 8 AUGUST 6, 2024 In accordance with City Council Resolution No. 2022-027, a one-time additional speaker time donation of three (3) minutes per individual is permitted; please note that the member of the public donating time must: 1) submit this in writing to the City Clerk by completing a "Request to Speak" form noting the name of the person to whom time is being donated to, and 2) be present at the time the speaker provides verbal comments. Verbal public comments are defined as comments provided in the speakers' own voice and may not include video or sound recordings of the speaker or of other individuals or entities, unless permitted by the Mayor. Public speakers may elect to use printed presentation materials to aid their comments; 15 copies of such printed materials shall be provided to the City Clerk to be disseminated to the City Council, made public, and incorporated into the public record of the meeting; it is requested that the printed materials are provided prior to the beginning of the meeting. There shall be no use of Chamber resources and technology to display visual or audible presentations during public comments, unless permitted by the Mayor. All writings or documents, including but not limited to emails and attachments to emails, submitted to the City regarding any item(s) listed or not listed on this agenda are public records. All information in such writings and documents is subject to disclosure as being in the public domain and subject to search and review by electronic means, including but not limited to the City's Internet Web site and any other Internet Web -based platform or other Web -based form of communication. All information in such writings and documents similarly is subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act [Government Code § 7920.000 et seq.]. TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY — INSTRUCTIONS Teleconference accessibility may be triggered in accordance with AB 2449 (Stats. 202Z Ch. 285), codified in the Brown Act [Government Code § 54953], if a member of the City Council requests to attend and participate in this meeting remotely due to `just cause" or "emergency circumstances," as defined, and only if the request is approved. In such instances, remote public accessibility and participation will be facilitated via Zoom Webinar as detailed at the end of this Agenda. *** TELECONFERENCE PROCEDURES — PURSUANT TO AB 2449*** APPLICABLE ONLY WHEN TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY IS IN EFFECT Verbal public comments via Teleconference — members of the public may attend and participate in this meeting by teleconference via Zoom and use the "raise your hand" feature when public comments are prompted by the Mayor; the City will facilitate the ability for a member of the public to be audible to the City Council and general public and allow him/her/them to speak on the item(s) requested. Please note — members of the public must unmute themselves when prompted upon being recognized by the Mayor, in order to become audible to the City Council and the public. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 7 of 8 AUGUST 6, 2024 Only one person at a time may speak by teleconference and only after being recognized by the Mayor. ZOOM LINK: https://us06web.zoom.us/i/82540879912 Meeting ID: 825 4087 9912 Or join by phone: (253) 215 — 8782 Written public comments — can be provided in person during the meeting or emailed to the City Clerk's Office at.CityClerkMail(a-)-LaQuintaCA.gov any time prior to the adjournment of the meeting, and will be distributed to the City Council, made public, incorporated into the public record of the meeting, and will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of any public comment is asked to be read, to the extent the City Clerk's Office can accommodate such request. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 8 of 8 AUGUST 6, 2024 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES TUESDAY, JULY 16, 2024 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 3:00 p.m. by Mayor Evans. PRESENT: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick, McGarrey, Pena, Sanchez, and Mayor Evans ABSENT: None PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA — None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA — Confirmed Councilmember McGarrey requested that a status update on the Cultural Campus Project No. 2019-01 be provided as comments under Consent Calendar Item No. 3. Council concurred. CLOSED SESSION 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) COUNCIL RECESSED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AND MOVED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 3:01 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 4:06 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: Mayor Evans said Council will reconvene Closed Session after the Open Session portion of the meeting to continue consideration of Closed Session Item No. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Councilmember McGarrey led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA — None CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 1 of 6 JULY 16, 2024 9 ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF OUTDOOR WORKER APPRECIATION WEEK Mayor Evans, on behalf of the Council presented a Proclamation in recognition of Outdoor Worker Appreciation Week to Maintenance and Operations Superintendent Alfred Berumen, representative of La Quinta's outdoor workers. 2. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — POLICY AND LEGISLATIVE UPDATE BY RIVERSIDE COUNTY DIVISION REGIONAL PUBLIC AFFAIRS MANAGER JESSE RAMIREZ Regional Public Affairs Manager Jesse Ramirez with the League of California Cities (League) provided a brief overview on the League's mission and objectives; upcoming events; legislation alerts; an update on the League's legislative policy, bills supported/opposed; membership benefits; and meeting schedules. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVE COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES OF JULY 2, 2024 2. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 615 ON SECOND READING AMENDING CHAPTER 2.60 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE CONFLIT OF INTERES CODE 3. APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH HGA FOR FINAL DESIGN SERVICES FOR CULTURAL CAMPUS PROJECT NO. 2019-01 4. EXECUSE ABSENCE OF COMMISSIONERS HERNANDEZ AND HUNDT FROM THE JULY 9, 2024, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING 5. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED JUNE 28 AND JULY 5, 2024 CONSENT CALENDAR — COMMENTS Item No. 3 — Cultural Campus Project No. 2019-01 — City Manager McMillen provided a detailed explanation of the services included in the HGA contract for final design services. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/ Pena to approve the Consent Calendar as presented, with Item No. 2 adopting Ordinance No. 615. Motion passed unanimously. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 2 of 6 JULY 16, 2024 10 BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPROVE CONVERTING RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT TRAFFIC CAR OFFICER POSITION TO A MOTOR OFFICER POSITION Public Safety Management Analyst Chastain introduced Riverside County Sheriff's Department Sargent Mark Chlarson who presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Alena Callimanis, La Quinta — asked if a hybrid plan has been considered such as a motor for winter months, replaced with a car during the summer months. Council discussed options to motor officers during summer months; effectiveness of motors to slow traffic speeding and collisions; and visibility of motor officers. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Sanchez/McGarrey to approve converting a Riverside County Sheriff's Department traffic car officer position to a motor officer position; and authorize the Mayor to execute the amendment to Law Enforcement contract as presented. Motion passed unanimously. STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS EISENHOWER DRIVE ROAD DIET, SOUTH OF CALLE SINALOA Public Works Director/City Engineer McKinney presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office with additional information presented by Consultant Traffic Engineer Steve Liebring with TKE Engineering, Inc., and Riverside County Sheriff Sergeant Chlarson. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Melissa Brown, La Quinta — in support of the road diet. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Lisa Moller, La Quinta — declined to speak when called upon. PUBLIC SPEAKER: Patrick Healy, La Quinta — in support of the road diet; and stated trees in Eisenhower median need trimming as they scrape tall vehicles. Mayor Evans said WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS were received from the residents listed below, regarding the proposed Eisenhower Drive Road diet, south of Calle Sinaloa, which were included as Attachment 4 to the published staff report for this item: • Gretchen Willis, La Quinta — opposed • Jon and Lisa Piatt, La Quinta — opposed City Clerk Radeva said WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS were received from the residents listed below, in alphabetical order, in support of the proposed Eisenhower Drive CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 3 of 6 JULY 16, 2024 11 Road diet, south of Calle Sinaloa, which were distributed to Council, made public, published on the City's website, and included in the public record of this meeting: • Linda Gunnett, La Quinta — in support • Paula Maietta, La Quinta — in support • Wells Marvin, La Quinta — in support Council discussed the recent speed survey; possible congestion if road is reduced to one lane in each direction from the current two lanes; visibility issues; resident parking issues; existing studies/analyses available from other locales; safety for golf carts and bicycles; data on lane reduction on Avenida Bermudas; vehicle capacity of one lane; easy flow of road diet on Adams Street; existing 81 miles of bike lanes in City and plans for 12 more miles; downside of reducing Eisenhower Drive to one lane; desire to hear from more residents on this matter; typical drop in speeds after road diets; before and after statistics on tickets issued in areas with road diets; and road rules for bicycles. Council reached a consensus and directed staff to stripe for two lanes for now; provide cost of changing to one lane; provide additional information, including existing studies; conduct monitoring; issue enforcement warnings; reconsider citywide golf cart and consider golf carts on that portion of Eisenhower Drive, survey in winter months when population increases and schools are back in session; return to Council in December or January with this additional data; and encourage public input. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO UPDATE THE CITY'S USER AND REGULATORY MASTER FEE SCHEDULE [RESOLUTION NO.2024-031] City Clerk Radeva introduced Terry Madsen, President with ClearSource Financial Services, Inc. who presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. Council discussed the percentage of Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase in 2022 and 2023; current percentage of cost recovery is not 100%, maybe about 77%; reasoning for keeping fees below 100% cost recovery; and pros and cons of going up to 100% cost recovery. City Clerk Radeva said a WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENT was received on July 15, 2024, from Grechen Gutierrez, Chief Executive Officer with the Desert Valley Builders Association (DVBA) in support of the proposed Master Fee Schedule update, which was distributed to Council, made public, published on the City's website, and included in the public record of this meeting. COUNCILMEMBER MCGARREY ANNOUNCED THAT SHE SERVES ON THE BOARD OF DVBA AS AN UNPAID VOLUNTEER AND HAD NO INVOLVEMENT OR INPUT IN THE DVBA'S POSITION ON THIS MATTER MAYOR EVANS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING OPEN AT 6:02 P.M. CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 4 of 6 JULY 16, 2024 12 PUBLIC SPEAKER: None MAYOR EVANS DECLARED THE PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED AT 6:03 P.M. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Sanchez/Fitzpatrick to adopt Resolution No. 2024-031 as presented: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING A REVISED MASTER FEE SCHEDULE OF VARIOUS USER AND REGULATORY FEES Motion passed unanimously. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS — None MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS Mayor Evans reported on her and other Councilmembers' attendance at the Para -Karate event; and meeting with Living Desert staff regarding the turtles living in the Civic Center Park lake. Councilmember Sanchez extended thoughts and prayers for former President Trump in light of the recent assassination attempt. Council concurred that it would discuss the City's membership in the League of California Cities after the upcoming League conference scheduled to be held in October 2024 in Long Beach. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS La Quinta's representative for 2024, Councilmember Fitzpatrick reported on her participation in the following organization's meeting: • RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION La Quinta's representative for 2024, Councilmember McGarrey reported on her participation in the following organizations' meetings: • COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY • LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE, RIVERSIDE COUNTY DIVISION La Quinta's representative for 2024, Mayor Pro Tern Pena reported on his participation in the following organization's meeting: • CV MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 5 of 6 JULY 16, 2024 13 CLOSED SESSION — Continued 1. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — ANTICIPATED LITIGATION; INITIATION OF LITIGATION PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (4) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 (NUMBER OF POTENTIAL CASES: 1) COUNCIL RECESSED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE MEETING AND MOVED INTO CLOSED SESSION AT 6:19 P.M. MAYOR EVANS RECONVENED THE OPEN SESSION PORTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AT 7:11 P.M. WITH ALL MEMBERS PRESENT REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Ihrke reported the following pursuant to Government Code section 54957.1 (Brown Act): • CLOSED SESSION ITEM NO. 1 — no new reportable action on this matter. The authorization to initiate or intervene in litigation as reported out for Closed Session Item No. 2 from the July 2, 2024, Council meeting remains in place, and no new action was taken tonight for Closed Session Item No. 1 that requires additional reporting. In accordance with Government Code section 54957.1, subdivision(a)(2), upon the formal commencement of or intervening in any litigation, the action, name of the parties, and other particulars of the litigation may be disclosed upon inquiry. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Councilmembers Fitzpatrick/Sanchez to adjourn at 7:12 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Page 6 of 6 JULY 16, 2024 14 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: EXCUSE ABSENCE OF COMMISSIONER BATAVICK FROM THE AUGUST 14, 2024, FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION MEETING RECOMMENDATION Excuse absence of Commissioner George Batavick from the August 14, 2024, Financial Advisory Commission meeting. XECUTIVE SUMMARY • Commissioner Batavick requested to be excused from the August 14, 2024, Financial Advisory Commission meeting due to personal reasons. • Commissioner Batavick has no excused or unexcused absences for fiscal year 2024/25. FISCAL IMPACT Absent members do not receive any meeting compensation. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Section 2.06.090 of the La Quinta Municipal Code states: "If any member of a board, commission or committee absents him or herself from two consecutive regular meetings or absents him or herself from a total of three regular meetings within any fiscal year, his/her office shall become vacant and shall be filled as any other vacancy. A board, commission or committee member may request advance permission from the city council to be absent at one or more regular meetings due to extenuating circumstances, and/or may request the city council to excuse an absence after -the -fact where such extenuating circumstances prevented the member from seeking advance permission to be absent. If such permission or excuse is granted by the city council, the absence shall not be counted toward the above -stated limitations on absences." ,LTERNATIVES Council may deny this request, which would result in the absences being counted toward the Commissioners' limitation on absences as noted above. Prepared by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager 15 16 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ACCEPT ON -SITE IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POLO VILLAS RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, TRACT MAP NO. 33085, LOCATED WEST OF MADISON STREET BETWEEN AVENUES 50 AND 52 RECOMMENDATION Accept the on -site improvements associated with Polo Villas residential development, Tract Map No. 33085, and authorize staff to release performance securities. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Polo Villas is a residential project located west of Madison Street between Avenues 50 and 52 (Attachment 1). • The developer has requested release of the performance securities. • Since all on -site improvements have been completed, staff recommends acceptance and release of the performance securities. FISCAL IMPACT — None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The developer has completed all on -site improvements required by Tract Map No. 33085. The improvements include pavement, curb and gutter, signing and striping, driveways, water and sewer improvements, dry utilities, storm drain improvements and landscaping. Staff inspected the on -site improvements and verified they meet City -approved plans and standards. ALTERNATIVES Accepting improvements is a ministerial action necessary for the release of improvement securities. Since the improvements have been inspected and meet City standards, staff does not recommend an alternative action. Prepared by: Amy Yu, Associate Engineer Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map 17 ATTACHMENT 1 TRACT MAP NO. 33085 El �lm AVENUE STA BONITA TRIVL 5 VICINITY NOT TO SCALE A VENUE 51 6ETH CIRCLE MAP 18 City of La Qu i nta CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO.4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 FRED WARING DRIVE AND MISCELLANEOUS LOCATIONS PROJECT NO. 2024-12 RECOMMENDATION Approve plans, specifications, engineer's estimate, and authorize staff to bid the PMP FY 2024/25 Fred Waring Drive and Miscellaneous Locations Project No. 2024-12. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The fiscal year (FY) 2024/25 Pavement Management Plan (PMP) Slurry Seal Improvements include over 2,500,000 feet of slurry and over 16,000 feet of pavement repair. • The first phase of the FY 2024/25 PMP includes the following areas (Attachment 1). o Seeley Drive and Forbes Circle: over 81,000 square feet of slurry o Fred Waring Drive: over 296,000 square feet of slurry o Cactus Flower and Sunflower Neighborhood: over 487,000 square feet of slurry o Calle Cadiz and Calle Fortuna: over 57,000 square feet of slurry o Seasons Neighborhood: over 91,000 square feet of slurry o Sagebrush Avenue, Date Palm Drive, Bottle Brush Drive and Saguaro Road: over 151,000 square feet of slurry o Seasons Way: over 16,000 square feet of grind and overlay • The second phase will include Cove Area streets anticipated for construction in winter of FY 2024/2025. FISCAL 11VIVAc: i The 2024/25 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) allocates $1,000,000 of General Funds and $1,000,000 of Measure G Funds with $500,000 anticipated in carry-over funding. The following is the project budget: 19 Total Budget Phase 1 Budget Design/Professional: $ 200,000 $ 100,000 Construction: $ 1,900,000 $ 800,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 150,000 $ 70,000 Contingency: $ 250,000 $ 100,000 Total Budget: $ 2,500,000 $ 1,070,000 13ACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The PMP funds improvements to maintain and upgrade City roadways and is divided into phases. This FY's improvements includes two phases. The first phase will slurry over 1,163,000 square feet of pavement and includes minor pothole hole repair and minor striping improvements. The majority of striping improvements include better delineation for bike lanes and addition of green paint backgrounds. Contingent upon approval to advertise the project for bid on August 6, 2024, the following is the project schedule: Council Bid Authorization Bid Period Council Considers Project Award Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (40 Working Days) Accept Improvements AL I tKNA I IVtb August 6, 2024 August 7 to September 4, 2024 September 17, 2024 September 18 to September 30, 2024 October 7 to December 3, 2024 December 2024 Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Ubaldo Ayon, Assistant Construction Manager Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Vicinity Map 20 Attachement 1 Phase 1 FY 2024/25 Pavement Management Plan Improvements SEELEY DR+FORGES CIRCLE PROJECT SITE SAGEBRUSH AVE+BOTTLEBRUSH DR+SAGUARO RD+DATE PALM DR PROJECT SITE SEASONS NEIGHBORHOOD PROJECT SITE CALLE TECATF FRED WARING DR+CACTUS FREP WARIHG UR- FLOWE/Raf NEIGHBORHOOD NEIGHBORHOOD MILES AVE. PROJECT PROJECT SITE hWr err a ILACKHAWK WAY w � w z HWY 1Tf z y AVEwu � 7 AVENUE w CAi.LE EU Ah�PIiY7 52nd. AVENUE rr GALL�CADIV + CALLUNA w PROJECT SITE VICINITY MAP NO SCA; 21 22 City of La Qu i nta CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO.5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE, AND ADVERTISE FOR BID THE SILVERROCK TEMPORARY GOLF CART PATH PAVING PROJECT NO. 2024-13 RECOMMENDATION Approve plans, specifications, engineer's estimate, and authorize staff to bid the SilverRock Temporary Golf Cart Path Paving Project No. 2024-13, located at the SilverRock Golf Course. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • During development work at SilverRock performed by the Robert Green Company, portions of the existing concrete golf cart path were removed and replaced with gravel base material with the understanding that they would be reconfigured after construction was completed. The SilverRock Golf Course, operated by Landmark Golf Management, LLP (Landmark), is requesting that the gravel paths be paved to reduce dust and premature wear and tear on the recently purchased golf carts. • The project will asphalt pave the temporary golf cart paths and driving range parking area to mitigate the dust produced (Attachment 1). FISCAL IMPACT The project is not currently in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP). Staff will request allocation once bids are received. The following is the anticipated overall project budget: Total Budget Design/Professional: $ 15,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 15,000 Construction: $ 150,000 Contingency: $ 20,000 Total Budget: $ 200,000 23 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City has received concerns from residents regarding dust coming from SilverRock. Staff has mitigated dust by continuously working toward placing ground cover and other dust control measures on recently disturbed areas within SilverRock that the City has jurisdiction over. Replacing the gravel paths with an asphalt surface will continue the effort to mitigate dust and provide a smoother surface for the users of the golf course. The asphalt surface will also help to minimize wear on the recently purchased golf carts. Landmark has requested that any work occur during periods when the course is closed, between October 1 through November 1, 2024. Contingent upon approval to advertise the project for bid on August 6, 2024, the following is the project schedule: Council Bid Authorization Bid Period Council Considers Project Award Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (15 Working Days) Accept Improvements August 6, 2024 August 7 to September 4, 2024 September 17, 2024 September 18 to September 30, 2024 October 1 to October 17, 2024 November 2024 ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Ubaldo Ayon, Assistant Construction Manager Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Location Map 24 SilverRock/Talus Temporary Cart Paths Place 3" AC over recompacted existing base for a proposed 10' wide cart path and parking area. Tm ATTACHMENT 1 Tegend .� :�:, � _- �... � � �.. --;,• �' '• Path .t :;'•. toPe _. ol -. a "'`��• s 'gig �F: �..•� -�_ ,.ANON3 _ e•` .�V V 9.1 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 6 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE AWARD CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE EISENHOWER BASIN SLOPE REPAIR PROJECT NO. 2023-22, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF EISENHOWER DRIVE BETWEEN AVENIDA FERNANDO AND COACHELLA DRIVE RECOMMENDATION Award a contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder to construct the Eisenhower Basin Slope Repair Project No. 2023-22; and authorize the City Manager to execute the contract and approve future change orders within the project budget amount. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The project is located at the Eisenhower Retention Basin (Basin) on the west side of Eisenhower Drive between Avenida Fernando and Coachella Drive (Attachment 1). The project will repair slopes that failed due to Tropical Storm Hilary in August 2023. The engineered soil that covers a specialized slope liner washed off and needs replacement to protect the liner from ultraviolet (UV) light. o An additive alternate to construct a concrete lined channel along the base of the hill adjacent to the Basin to collect drainage water, which will help mitigate future erosion, will be included in the scope of the project. Staff is actively working with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to request funding for both the repairs and betterment of the Basin. • The project is currently out to bid and will open August 19, 2024. To expedite the construction phase of this project and allow staff to submit requirements for funding to FEMA; staff recommends allowing the City Manager to execute a contract with the lowest responsive and responsible bidder within the project budget. FISCAL IMPACT The 2024/25 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) allocates $477,000 of General Funds with $1,800,000 anticipated in carry-over funding to the 2425DRA Citywide Drainage Enhancements Project. The following is the project budget for this phase of work: Total Budget Professional/Design: $ 25,000 Inspection/Testing/Survey: $ 20,000 Construction: $ 500,000 Contingency: $ 50,000 Total Budget: $ 595,000 27 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Damage caused to the Basin during Tropical Storm Hilary exposed a specialized liner along the basin slopes. The liner cannot be exposed to UV light for a long period of time, or it will degrade. On November 16, 2023, staff solicited construction bids from qualified contractors. The City received three (3) bids on December 11, 2023. Leonida Builders, Inc. of Acton, California submitted the lowest responsible and responsive bid at $280,395. These costs were higher than the anticipated project budget and the cost range of the bids varied significantly. On December 19, 2023, Council approved rejecting all bids and revising the scope to reduce uncertainty within the scope and to allow the project to complete the application and field reviews needed to satisfy the requirements with requesting FEMA funding. Staff re -bid the project with proposed betterments as an additive alternate since FEMA allows for betterments to help mitigate future repairs. Contingent upon approval to award the project August 6, 2024, the following is the proposed project schedule: Project Bid Opens Execute Contract and Mobilize Construction (30 Working Days) Accept Improvements ALTERNATIVES August 19, 2024 August 20 to September 10, 2024 September 10 to October 21, 2024 November 2024 Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Ubaldo Ayon, Assistant Construction Manager Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment 1: Vicinity Map 28 Opmorsv -44 V - iwv�� Mfrs, � �w«•4i. I , UNI .10 40 _ V. OjectMPla` irv,iO�l3l4WAYAI ' ` ^� erOp r¢ �qi; ' r'►:',+W.Aku _rR*. ■ Locationdr i �. � -• W A1fj _ iY}}r.� �itrcv- lay •t.• �, % iq „tar �(+?�i ' �pw �' 1 40 F S3T•~ �typ +�' w� } f ivi�l•�a.:Mrl�.y.ar•a�i•sr■'`� 1t. �'' 1'�.•d'• ft #k' •-•v.rR4ilj,ft ;.: 6b Z a.� - X=. �it3td 3+,• Ytc'EIU a ,� r h� dp L■ has'. "1+9 ,. f .- r• S r to r*"*-Ir! Pj ,� +vial Rye-ai « Ai�k+rwt+++i+.�: .,p�t-�it+ 30 City of La Qu i nta CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO.7 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH RY+AO FOR DESIGN SERVICES FOR MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION YARD PROJECT NO. 2018-05 RECOMMENDATION Approve agreement for contract services with RY+AO for Phase 1 Master Planning Design Services for the Maintenance and Operation Yard Project No. 2018-05; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • On May 21, 2019, Council approved an agreement with Gillis and Panichapan Architects, Inc (GPA) to complete a facilities assessment to quantify the magnitude and cost of reconfiguring the existing 2.8-acre site for the City's Maintenance and Operations Yard (Project). A site plan exhibit map is included as Attachment 1. In March 2024, staff solicited proposals to update the assessment and prepare a master plan (phase 1), prepare preliminary design services (phase 2), and final design services (phase 3). The City received two (2) proposals in April 2024. • Staff recommends approving an Agreement for Contract Services (Agreement) with RY+AO for Phase 1 (Attachment 2). FISCAL IMPACT Budget for the Project was allocated in fiscal years 2019/20, 2023/24, and 2024/25 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) in the amount of $1,591,013, which includes $1,311,013 in Measure G funding and $280,000 in Maintenance and Facilities DIF. The following is the Project budget: Project Budget* Professional $ 190,000 Master Planning/Design $ 1,084,073 Contingency $ 316,940 TOTAL: $ 1,591,013 31 *Staff will return to Council with a complete project budget that will include construction costs and request additional appropriations once the master plans and estimates have been completed. Total Project costs are currently estimated at $1,084,073 for Phases 1, 2, and 3. Total cost for Phase 1 only under the proposed Agreement with RY+AO is not to exceed $222,806. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Maintenance and Operation Yard shares a 10-acre site with Fire Station #32, a former fire station, and Fritz Burns Park. The park contains a swimming pool, playground, restrooms, six tennis courts, eight pickle ball courts, a skate park, a dog park, and off- street parking. In May 2019, GPA was hired to complete a facilities assessment to quantify the magnitude and cost of reconfiguring the existing 2.8-acre site for the City's Maintenance and Operations Yard (Attachment 3). GPA's work includes planning and programming (space planning) for the administrative offices and crew quarters, along with related storage facilities. GPA considered the City's Maintenance Yard Master Plan prepared in 2008 and the Facility Needs Assessment prepared in 2018 as part of the La Quinta Academy work. After Staff reviewed the assessment and estimate in March 2020, it was determined that the project should be placed on hold for future reassessment due to cost. On March 26, 2024, a Request for Proposals (RFP) was posted on the City website to provide Professional Planning and Design Services. Two (2) responses were received on April 25, 2024. The RFP listed three phases: Phase 1: Perform appropriate engineering -related field surveys and prepare the base map; update the Maintenance and Operations Yard Master Plan and Facility Needs Assessment; perform the Planning and Programming Step for the proposed Maintenance Office and Crew Quarters and any amendments to the exterior storage facilities; and present findings to Council for direction. • Phase 2: Prepare preliminary plans and cost estimates for the proposed site layout based on the selected Master Plan Needs Assessment option. • Phase 3: Prepare final plans, specifications, and cost estimates from the preliminary plans. Staff recommends approving an Agreement with RY+AO for Phase 1 of the Project. When Phase 1 work is accepted, the City will have the option to continue services with RY+AO. 32 ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Ubaldo Ayon, Assistant Construction Manager Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Site Plan 2. Agreement for Contract Services with RY+AO 3. Needs Assessment 33 Site Plan Exhibit ATTACHMENT 1 Existing Total Acreage 10 acres (Not to Scale) 34 I►_1ir_Ta:ILT, I=1►11 W: AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, ("City"), a California municipal corporation, and JSL Architecture, Inc., a California corporation, d/b/a RY+AO ("Contracting Party"). The parties hereto agree as follows: 1. SERVICES OF CONTRACTING PARTY. 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall provide those services related to design and related professional services for the City's Maintenance and Operations Yard, as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Services"). Contracting Party represents and warrants that Contracting Party is a provider of first-class work and/or services and Contracting Party is experienced in performing the Services contemplated herein and, in light of such status and experience, Contracting Party covenants that it shall follow industry standards in performing the Services required hereunder, and that all materials, if any, will be of good quality, fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase "industry standards" shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar services under similar circumstances. 1.2 Compliance with Law. All Services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations, and laws of the City and any Federal, State, or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.3 Wage and Hour Compliance, Contracting Party shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local wage and hour laws. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified herein, Contracting Party shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement, including a City of La Quinta business license. Contracting Party and its employees, agents, and subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Contracting Party shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, and hold City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, free and harmless against any direct or indirect damages imposed against City hereunder for failure to pay any fees, assessments, and taxes, or for failure to obtain licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the Services. Contracting Party shall be responsible for all subcontractors' compliance with this Section. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Contracting Party acknowledges that (a) it has visited and considered the Services to be performed, (b) it 35 has visited the site where the Services are to be performed, if any, and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has considered how the Services should be performed, and (d) it understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. Should Contracting Party discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the Services or as represented by City, Contracting Party shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contracting Party's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). 1.6 Standard of Care. Contracting Party acknowledges and understands that the Services contracted for under this Agreement require specialized skills and abilities and that, consistent with this understanding, Contracting Party's work will be held to an industry standard of quality and workmanship. Consistent with Section 1.5 hereinabove, Contracting Party represents to City that it holds the necessary skills and abilities to satisfy the industry standard of quality as set forth in this Agreement. Contracting Party shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of this Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the Services performed by Contracting Party, and the equipment, materials, papers, and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Services by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence. The performance of Services by Contracting Party shall not relieve Contracting Party from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work at no further cost to City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Contracting Party. The standard of care for all professional services performed or furnished by Contracting Party under this Agreement will be the care and skill used by members of Contracting Party's profession practicing under similar circumstances at the same time and in the same locality. Except as provided in this Agreement, Contracting Party makes no warranties, express or implied, under this Agreement or otherwise, in connection with Contracting Party's services. 1.7 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services ("Additional Services") only when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, provided that Contracting Party shall not be required to perform any Additional Services without compensation. Contracting Party shall not perform any Additional Services until receiving prior written authorization (in the form of a written change order if Contracting Party is a contractor performing the Services) from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of Contracting Party. It is expressly understood by Contracting Party that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to the Services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. It is specifically understood and agreed that oral requests and/or approvals of Additional Services shall be barred and are unenforceable. Failure of Contracting Party to secure the Contract Officer's, or assigned designee's written authorization for Additional Services shall constitute a waiver of any and all right to adjustment of the 36 -2- Contract Sum or time to perform this Agreement, whether by way of compensation, restitution, quantum meruit, or the like, for Additional Services provided without the appropriate authorization from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Compensation for properly authorized Additional Services shall be made in accordance with Section 2.3 of this Agreement. 1.8 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in "Exhibit D" (the "Special Requirements"), which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special Requirements shall govern. Ll»01[.Y_N9NJ1 2.1 Contract Sum. For the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with "Exhibit B" (the "Schedule of Compensation") in a total amount not to exceed Two Hundred Twenty -Two Thousand Eight Hundred Six Dollars ($222,806), for the life of the Agreement, encompassing the Initial and any Extended Terms (the "Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.7. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the Services, payment for time and materials based upon Contracting Party's rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other reasonable methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Contracting Party at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City; Contracting Party shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Regardless of the method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation, Contracting Party's overall compensation shall not exceed the Contract Sum, except as provided in Section 1.7 of this Agreement. 2.2 Method of Billing & Payment. Any month in which Contracting Party wishes to receive payment, Contracting Party shall submit to City no later than the tenth (10th) working day of such month, in the form approved by City's Finance Director, an invoice for Services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Such invoice shall (1) describe in detail the Services provided, including time and materials, and (2) specify each staff member who has provided Services and the number of hours assigned to each such staff member. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a principal member of Contracting Party specifying that the payment requested is for Services performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon approval in writing by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, and subject to retention pursuant to Section 8.3, City will pay Contracting Party for all items stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than thirty (30) days after invoices are received by the City's Finance Department. 37 -3- 2.3 Compensation for Additional Services. Additional Services approved in advance by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, pursuant to Section 1.7 of this Agreement shall be paid for in an amount agreed to in writing by both City and Contracting Party in advance of the Additional Services being rendered by Contracting Party. Any compensation for Additional Services amounting to five percent (5%) or less of the Contract Sum may be approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Any greater amount of compensation for Additional Services must be approved by the La Quinta City Council, the City Manager, or Department Director, depending upon City laws, regulations, rules and procedures concerning public contracting. Under no circumstances shall Contracting Party receive compensation for any Additional Services unless prior written approval for the Additional Services is obtained from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, pursuant to Section 1.7 of this Agreement. 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE. 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. If the Services not completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance, as set forth in Section 3.2 and "Exhibit C", it is understood that the City will suffer damage. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in "Exhibit C" (the "Schedule of Performance"). Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. 3.3 Force Maieure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Contracting Party, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if Contracting Party shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the forced delay when and if in the Contract Officer's judgment such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer's determination, or assigned designee, shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. Extensions to time period in the Schedule of Performance which are determined by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, to be justified pursuant to this Section shall not entitle the Contracting Party to additional compensation in excess of the Contract Sum. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions in Article 8.0 of this Agreement, the term of this agreement shall commence on August 12, 2024, and terminate on December 31, 2025 ("Initial Term"). This Agreement may be 38 -4- extended for 1 additional year upon mutual agreement by both parties ("Extended Term"), and executed in writing. 4. COORDINATION OF WORK. 4.1 Representative of Contracting Party. The following principals of Contracting Party ("Principals") are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Contracting Party authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the Services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: (a) Name: Jianshan Liang Telephone No.: 619-224-3605 Email: jliang(a-ry-aoarchitects.com (b) Name: Richard Yen Email: ryen(a-ry-aoarchitects.com It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing Principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contracting Party and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be changed by Contracting Party and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer. The "Contract Officer", otherwise known as Bryan McKinney, City Engineer and Public Works Director, or assigned designee may be designated in writing by the City Manager of the City. It shall be Contracting Party's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services, and Contracting Party shall refer any decisions, that must be made by City to the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall have authority to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of Contracting Party, its principals, and its employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Agreement, Contracting Party shall not contract or subcontract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated, or encumbered, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Contracting Party, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. Any 39 -5- attempted or purported assignment or contracting or subcontracting by Contracting Party without City's express written approval shall be null, void, and of no effect. No approved transfer shall release Contracting Party of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode, or means by which Contracting Party, its agents, or its employees, perform the Services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision, or control of Contracting Party's employees, servants, representatives, or agents, or in fixing their number or hours of service. Contracting Party shall perform all Services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Contracting Party shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Contracting Party in its business or otherwise or a joint venture or a member of any joint enterprise with Contracting Party. Contracting Party shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City. Contracting Party shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. Except for the Contract Sum paid to Contracting Party as provided in this Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contracting Party for performing the Services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contracting Party for injury or sickness arising out of performing the Services hereunder. Notwithstanding any other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Contracting Party and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing services under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System (TERS") as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. Contracting Party agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Contracting Party shall fully comply with the workers' compensation laws regarding Contracting Party and Contracting Party's employees. Contracting Party further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Contracting Party to comply with applicable workers' compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any payment due to Contracting Party under this Agreement any amount due to City from Contracting Party as a result of Contracting Party's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. 4.5 Identity of Persons Performing Work. Contracting Party represents that it employs or will employ at its own expense all personnel required for the satisfactory performance of any and all of the Services set forth herein. Contracting Party represents that the Services required herein will be performed by Contracting Party or under its direct supervision, and that all personnel engaged in such work shall be fully qualified and shall 40 -6- be authorized and permitted under applicable State and local law to perform such tasks and services. 4.6 City Cooperation. City shall provide Contracting Party with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records, or other data or information pertinent to the Services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to Contracting Party only from or through action by City. 5. INSURANCE. 5.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of any Services under this Agreement and throughout the duration of the term of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, policies of insurance as set forth in "Exhibit E" (the "Insurance Requirements") which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. 5.2 Proof of Insurance. Contracting Party shall provide Certificate of Insurance to Agency along with all required endorsements. Certificate of Insurance and endorsements must be approved by Agency's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. 6. INDEMNIFICATION. 6.1 Indemnification. Indemnification is incorporated as set forth in "Exhibit F" ("Indemnification") and expressly made a part hereof. 7. RECORDS AND REPORTS. 7.1 Reports. Contracting Party shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, such reports concerning Contracting Party's performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall require. Contracting Party hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Contracting Party agrees that if Contracting Party becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein or, if Contracting Party is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Contracting Party shall promptly notify the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, of said fact, circumstance, technique, or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Contracting Party is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 7.2 Records. Contracting Party shall keep, and require any subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports (including but not limited to payroll reports), studies, or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and the Services performed hereunder (the "Books and Records"), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and 41 -7- enable the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Books and Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall have full and free access to such Books and Records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such Books and Records. Such Books and Records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Books and Records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Contracting Party's business, custody of the Books and Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Contracting Party's successor in interest. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds expended under this Agreement exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement. 7.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents, and other materials plans, drawings, estimates, test data, survey results, models, renderings, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings, digital renderings, or data stored digitally, magnetically, or in any other medium prepared or caused to be prepared by Contracting Party, its employees, subcontractors, and agents in the performance of this Agreement (the "Documents and Materials") shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, or upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, and Contracting Party shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Documents and Materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed Documents and Materials for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by Contracting Party will be at City's sole risk and without liability to Contracting Party, and Contracting Party's guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, revise, or assignment. Contracting Party may retain copies of such Documents and Materials for its own use. Contracting Party shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any Documents and Materials prepared by them, and in the event Contracting Party fails to secure such assignment, Contracting Party shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. 7.4 In the event City or any person, firm, or corporation authorized by City reuses said Documents and Materials without written verification or adaptation by Contracting Party for the specific purpose intended and causes to be made or makes any changes or alterations in said Documents and Materials, City hereby releases, discharges, and exonerates Contracting Party from liability resulting from said change. The provisions of this clause shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement and shall thereafter remain in full force and effect. 42 -8- 7.5 Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, rights of reproduction, and other intellectual property embodied in the Documents and Materials. Contracting Party shall require all subcontractors, if any, to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for the Documents and Materials the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contracting Party represents and warrants that Contracting Party has the legal right to license any and all of the Documents and Materials. Contracting Party makes no such representation and warranty in regard to the Documents and Materials which were prepared by design professionals other than Contracting Party or provided to Contracting Party by City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Materials at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7.6 Release of Documents. The Documents and Materials shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, or as required by law. Contracting Party shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of City, except as required by law or as authorized by City. 7.7 Confidential or Personal Identifying Information. Contracting Party covenants that all City data, data lists, trade secrets, documents with personal identifying information, documents that are not public records, draft documents, discussion notes, or other information, if any, developed or received by Contracting Party or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Contracting Party to any person or entity without prior written authorization by City or unless required by law. City shall grant authorization for disclosure if required by any lawful administrative or legal proceeding, court order, or similar directive with the force of law. All City data, data lists, trade secrets, documents with personal identifying information, documents that are not public records, draft documents, discussions, or other information shall be returned to City upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement. Contracting Party's covenant under this section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 8. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT. 8.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed, and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim, or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Contracting Party covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 8.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefore. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long 43 -9- as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety, or general welfare, City may take such immediate action as City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this Section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to this Article 8.0. During the period of time that Contracting Party is in default, City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during any period of default. 8.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Contracting Party sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by City due to the default of Contracting Party in the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. 8.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non -defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. City's consent or approval of any act by Contracting Party requiring City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Contracting Party. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 8.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 8.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 8.7 Termination Prior To Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Contracting Party. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Contracting Party shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Contracting Party shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any Services 44 -10- authorized by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, except amounts held as a retention pursuant to this Agreement. 8.8 Termination for Default of Contracting Party. If termination is due to the failure of Contracting Party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, Contracting Party shall vacate any City -owned property which Contracting Party is permitted to occupy hereunder and City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 8.2, take over the Services and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Contracting Party shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Contracting Party for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed City. 8.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees; provided, however, that the attorneys' fees awarded pursuant to this Section shall not exceed the hourly rate paid by City for legal services multiplied by the reasonable number of hours spent by the prevailing party in the conduct of the litigation. Attorneys' fees shall include attorneys' fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorneys' fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery, and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose. 9. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NONDISCRIMINATION. 9.1 Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer, official, employee, agent, representative, or volunteer of City shall be personally liable to Contracting Party, or any successor in interest, in the event or any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Contracting Party or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 9.2 Conflict of Interest. Contracting Party covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of it, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contracting Party's performance of the Services under this Agreement. Contracting Party further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Contracting Party agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. 45 -11- No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which effects his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Contracting Party warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 9.3 Covenant against Discrimination. Contracting Party covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of any impermissible classification including, but not limited to, race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Contracting Party shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry. 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 10.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. To City: To Contracting Party: CITY OF LA QUINTA RY+AO Attention: Bryan McKinney Attention: Jianshan Liang 78495 Calle Tampico 731 South Highway 101, Suite 1M La Quinta, California 92253 Solana Beach, CA 92075 10.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 10.3 Section Headings and Subheadings. The section headings and subheadings contained in this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the terms of this Agreement. 10.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 46 -12- 10.5 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement including the exhibits hereto is the entire, complete, and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements, and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. 10.6 Amendment. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Contracting Party and by the City Council of City. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. 10.7 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the articles, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining articles, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 10.8 Unfair Business Practices Claims. In entering into this Agreement, Contracting Party offers and agrees to assign to City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials related to this Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time City renders final payment to Contracting Party without further acknowledgment of the parties. 10.9 No Third -Party Beneficiaries. With the exception of the specific provisions set forth in this Agreement, there are no intended third -party beneficiaries under this Agreement and no such other third parties shall have any rights or obligations hereunder. 10.10 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of each of the parties hereto represent and warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 47 -13- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. CITY OF LA QUINTA, RY+AO: a California Municipal Corporation JON McMILLEN, City Manager City of La Quinta, California Name: Title: Dated: Dated: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California Name: Title: Dated: 48 -14- Exhibit A Scope of Services Services to be Provided: This Contract is limited to the attached Scope of Work referenced as Phase I. Exhibit A 49 Page 1 of 4 Last revised summer 2017 We propose to provide A&E services for the scope of services outlined in the Request for Proposals for City of La Quinta Professional Planning and Design Services - Maintenance and Operations Yard Project No. 2018-05. A detailed scope of work by phase is provided below. PHASE I A. Kick-off Meeting 1. Coordinate with City to initiate and locate Geotechnical Borings. (Geotechnical to be contracted directly by the City). 2. Coordinate with the City to mobilize A&E team to visit the site & observe present operations. B. Programming & Facilities Surveys (Data Gathering & Benchmarking) 1. Review prior architect's programming document to understand 2020 programming assumptions. 2. Schedule tour of existing Maintenance & Operations yard 3. Initial meeting with City of La Quinta Mgr./Operations Mgmt. Team to compare 2020 goals with 2024 goals. Establish overall modifications to the 2020 Needs Assessment. 4. Based on Initial meeting, schedule Dept. Interviews to validate current and future requirements. a. Existing City Hall b. Public Works c. Electric Utilities (Yard, Warehouse, Admin.) d. Water District (Yard & Admin.) e. Transportation (Vehicle Yard &Admin.) 5. Discuss optional Business Resiliency, future operational forecasts, technological, shared workplace considerations. 6. Structural Standards. Business Resiliency Assessment: Determine what standards of assessment, if any, the City may consider to assure operational sustainability during a significant Seismic or catastrophic event: FEMA, ASCE, Non -Structural. Identify any Structural Business Resiliency Requirements 7. MEP: Assess Overall condition of existing facilities. Goal to provide MEP systems comparison between existing systems and current technologies, efficiencies, MEP Business Resiliency: Establish MEP Business Resiliency requirements. Review internal Facilities Asset & Maintenance Reports. Assess if existing MEP Non -Structural Assets Assessment is required. 8. Landscape: Provide landscape minimum requirements, provide recommendations connecting park to New Operations Yard. 9. Civil: Mobilize survey, topo, site legal description. 10. Dry Utility: Obtain will serve letters from each utility pertaining to the area; request pertaining dry utility records to the project, as necessary. C. Facilities Assessment Our teams will evaluate the existing condition. a. Electrical: existing power distribution. b. Plumbing systems: Sanitary sewer system and Domestic water distribution system points of connection on site. 1 50 c. Fire protection systems: Emergency lighting system, fire sprinkler and suppression system, fire alarm detection system and standpipe system. d. Site Systems: Vehicular and Pedestrian Pavements. Open Space, Landscape space, Parking, Operational Yard, Fleet Ops. by Dept., ADA Existing Commentary. e. Optional Solar/Microgrid, Emergency Power Alternatives. 2. Digital Photographs: Digital photos will be captured and used for internal quality control purposes. Photos will be captured for building identification and documentation of asset and system conditions. Select photos will be used within the narrative reports; however, all photos will be made available through a Share Point site forthe client's convenience. 3. Structural: Physical survey of City of La Quinta Operations Yard Facilities. 4. MEP: Physical survey of City of La Quinta Operations Yard Facilities that utilize MEP. Assess equipment loads, EV loads, Bldg. Elec./HVAC, Site Elec./ Lighting loads. Identify Non -Structural and Business Resiliency Gap Analysis. 5. Landscape: Map required landscape area per code. Develop conceptual landscape areas, Admin. Bldg., Visitor Parking, Entry features. 6. Civil: Initiate Site As -built underground survey, conceptual topo, and drainage plans. 7. Dry Utility: Visit site and document existing conditions. D. Concept Study 1. Distribute BU/Dept. Programmatic Dept. collaboration, objective: Discuss and compare 2020 program with 2024 current use, future use(s). Determine future space over a three - year, five-year period expansion or contraction plan. It will also be determined how a BU/Dept will optimize their business functions (Benchmark existing business operations). Assess physical proximity to those in their BU or benefit by being co -located adjacent to other common BU's who would enhance their operations. Develop Benchmark City Spatial Assessments by Business Unit, Space adequacy, spatial growth models by dept., optimized adjacencies. Develop Concept Studies, Blocking Plans, Site Plans a. Meetings with Business Units to identify individual end user issues, priorities, business objectives, operational requirements, and goals (Facilities Dept. Directors, Sr. Managers). b. Back Fill Planning Services: Develop strategic consolidation scenarios to re -align work adjacencies and in -fill the vacancies at the re -located business unit locations. c. The programming logic will be developed in concert with City of La Quinta City Mgr. & BU. d. Meet with internal City support groups (IT, Environmental, Security, Safety) to identify their requirements and business objectives associated with City Needs Assessment. e. Host two cross -functional interview sessions with all groups to identify common business goals, unidentified requirements and operational goals which may exist between business units and city support groups. f. Assess Space requirements for each existing BU, will be developed leveraging Program Data comparing each BU's existing space & assets requirements with projected 3/ 5-year requirements. Discuss and project 10 yr. growth model. 2. Compile Existing Photo survey. Assess Dept. FF&E, any existing assets that will be re- used. 3. Develop Structural recommendations. Present all City of La Quinta Structural assessments. 4. Develop MEP Assessment recommendations. Present all City of La Quinta MEP assessments. 5. Develop conceptual planting and hardscape locations, recommended fencing, walls, etc. 2 51 6. In collaboration with City and A&E team advise team of any topographic, site civil issues that would affect development of the Admin. Bldg., Canopies, parking, gates, CNG location, etc. 7. Identify existing dry utility conflicts and provide design feedback. E. Deliverables: two (2) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy (Microsoft Word/Excel format) 1. Completed Overview of findings, Adjusted program recommendation for each City Operating Unit. 2. Photographic Survey. 3. Concept Plan and renderings. II. PHASE II A. Schematic Design 1. Develop Schematic Studies: a. Admin. Bldg. b. Yard, Warehouse. c. Transportation (Vehicles -Visitor, FTE, Fleet, EV) d. Temporary Operational planning to maintain current City Operations during construction of new Admin. Bldg. and Yard Reorganization. 2. Develop Schematic Design: Translate Program to Space Plans. Develop Schematic Shell/ Core and Preliminary Space Plans. Collaborate with A&E Team to assess consultant finding. Review findings with City Program Mgr. and ea. City Dept. head. 3. Develop building Structural alternatives. Collaborate with Cost Estimator to identify current unit pricing and cost differentials and constructability times between systems. 4. Develop MEP systems alternatives: Provide narrative describing systems advantages, cost effectiveness, life cycle analysis, etc. POC's, power requirements, Admin. Bldg. EV & Site Elec. & Lighting concepts 5. Finalize conceptual planting and hardscape locations, recommended fencing, walls, etc. 6. Once Geotechnical report is issued, develop conceptual BMP, SWPP site water retention strategies. 7. Develop a Facilities comparison between 2020/2024 & future space and Bldg. Equipment projections. B. Analyze Programmatic Data / Convert to Floor Plans / Bldg. Plans / Master Plan 1. Develop individual Business Unit/ Dept. spatial needs requirements. Develop Dept. block plans, adjacencies, grow representations. Translate Programming Finding into Concept bldg. plans. Develop 2-3 Conceptual City Master Plans leveraging pre-existing and any new or proposed space. 2. Integrate structural findings. 3. Integrate MEPfindings. 4. Integrate Arch. Survey finding with RY+AO Programmatic- Spatial translation. C. Deliverables: two (2) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy (Microsoft Word/Excel format) 1. Schematic Study shall consist of the following: a. One site plan illustrating location of facility, parking, site circulation, floor plan. Studies shall illustrate present capacity, recommended expansion space to accommodate present and future programmatic requirements, business adjacencies between Operating Units & Dept. 1) Existing Admin. Bldg.- Current and future capacity at existing site. 3 52 2) Parking, FTE, Visitor, Fleet, EV 3) Yard, Warehouse. 4) Adjacency & Site design considerations with respect to the Park & Fire Station 5) Vehicular access- public streets, on -site circulation. 6) Security, fencing, ingress & exiting control, bldg. security, cameras, alarms, etc. 7) A presentation of the findings and recommendations to the La Quinta City Mgr./Ops Mgr. / City Council meeting. 2. Concept Landscape areas and fencing areas 3. Topo, lot boundaries, concept recommendations if there any site water retention issues, topography issues, curb cut / site access issues, etc. 4. Dry Utility: Identify potential primary circuit voltage based on load demand and circuit availability (12 / 16kV); Determine utility company transformation needs per Design Guidelines and parameters; Identify potential KVA demand based on utility company historical data; Provide viable conceptual transformer locations and dry utility designs for proposed building; Identify all necessary structures and estimate cost, timing, and sequence; Coordinate all necessary underground conversions in the alley; Assist in identifying potential SoCal Gas design options and metering options; Assist in locating potential tie in points and viable gas meter locations; Coordinate all utility removals and quitclaim of easements; Compile overall dry utility composite exhibits D. Design Development 1. Preparation of Design Development documents based upon approved Schematic Design documents for Owner review and approval. The purpose of Design Development documents is to establish the final scope, relationships, forms, size, and appearance of the Project through: a. Plans, sections, and elevations b. Preliminary selection of building systems and materials C. Typical construction details d. Final material selection e. Equipment layouts. 2. Structural recommendations integrated with Cost Estimate 3. MEP concept systems recommendations integrated with Cost Estimate 4. Develop City of La Quinta Design Development Cost Estimate a) Cost estimate inclusive of projected escalation costs. 5. Deliverables: two (2) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy (Microsoft Word/Excel format) Design Development Plans Provide an estimated cost in current dollars for estimated design, construction, inspection, furnishing and equipment, and contingency fees to meet the needs identified in the planning work. Cost Estimate shall provide a general breakdown of each facility, or cost/SF for Admin. Bldg., storage facilities, CNG move, etc. III. PHASE III A. Construction Documents Services 1. Preparation of Construction Documents based upon approved Design Development documents. Construction Documents may include the following: 4 53 • Site Plan • Vicinity Map • Building Summary • Sheet Index • Building Department Notes • Accessibility Requirements per CAC Title 24 • Demolition Plan • Floor Plan(s) • Roof Plan • Building Sections • Exterior Elevations • Interior Elevations • Door and Window Schedules • Architectural Details • Mechanical Plans and Diagrams • Plumbing Plans and Diagrams • Electrical Plans and Diagrams • Landscape Architecture Plans and Details • Civil Plans 2. Building Commissioning - Design Phase a. Commissioning scope of work includes quality assurance functional performance systems review per owner's requirements for: 1) Operations yard exceeding 10,000 sq. ft. a) Mechanical, lighting control, and domestic hot water systems b) Irrigation controller and Photovoltaic Systems b. Complete Title 24 Certificate of Compliance, Design Review Kick-off checklist, which will be submitted to the City Building Department. A design reviewer is required for non-residential conditioned spaces of 10,000 sq. ft. or more. c. Meet with owner and architect to assist in developing the Owner's Project Requirements (OPR). d. Provide Title 24 third party review of design drawings, submit issues and observations report to project team and complete and sign Certificate of Compliance, Design Review Compliance sheet, which will be submitted to the City Building Department. e. Complete Title 24 Certificate of Compliance, Commissioning Construction Documents checklist and submit to the City Building Department. Measures covered include building envelope, lighting, domestic hot water, and HVAC design. f. Coordinate with A&E to develop Basis of Design (BOD) documentation. g. Develop and present a Commissioning Plan (Cx Plan) to the owner (and the Building Official where required). The Cx Plan is intended to guide each responsible team member through the Commissioning process and document accountability of each discipline. h. Develop clear Commissioning Specifications and the functional testing requirements to be included in the construction bid documents. 3. Preparation of Project Specifications 4. Reasonable coordination with all consultants. 5. Reasonable coordination with all design -build consultants, if any. 5 54 6. Normal processing of documents through the City of La Quinta as required to obtain permits for construction. 7. Bi-monthly progress meetings with Architect included. 8. Deliverables: two (2) hard copies and one (1) electronic copy (Microsoft Word/Excel format) a. Construction Documents b. Commissioning Plan c. Project Specifications d. Cost Estimate B. Bidding Services 1. Preparation of Bid Package including drawings and Project Manual. 2. Issuance of Bid Package to Owner for distribution to bidders. (Note: Printing of bid sets for distribution to bidders is not included in our scope of work). 3. Respond to reasonable questions from bidders during bid process. 4. Preparation of addenda for issuance to bidders 5. Assist Owner in the review of bids. C. Construction Administration Services The Architect shall visit the site at intervals appropriate to the stage of construction to become generally familiar with the progress and quality of the work completed, and to determine, in general, if the work observed is being performed in a manner indicating that the work, when fully completed, will be in accordance with the drawings and specifications. However, the Architect shall not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the work. On the basis of the site visits, the Architect shall keep the Owner reasonably informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the work completed, and report to the Owner (1) know deviations from the Contract Documents and from the most recent construction schedule submitted by the Contractor, and (2) defects and deficiencies observed in the work. The Architect is not responsible for the performance of the General Contractor or its subcontractors, for their errors and/or omissions, the construction for the space, or the construction schedule, if any. Construction Administration services are limited as follows: a. Review of shop drawings/submittals. b. Response to Contractor Requests for Information c. Preparation of bulletins (if required). d. Preparation of project punchlist. 2. A maximum of one (1) construction progress visits by Architect per month for a total construction duration of twelve (12) months. 6 55 IV. ASSUMPTIONS & EXCLUSIONS A. Signage Design 1. All exterior and interior signage is provided in this proposal. All street signage, building signage and interior room signage designations shall be provided by others, not a part of A&E professional services. B. Environmental Land Planning 1. Professional services to entitle discretionary entitlements, mitigate negative declarations, CEQA are not included in our professional services. RY+AO has solicited a proposal from Michael Baker and Associates to provide preliminary entitlement finding if required. These services shall be provided upon request. C. Traffic Engineering Services 1. Services of a traffic engineerwere not designated as a requirement for this project and are excluded. Clarification, all vehicular traffic flow, truck turning radius studies, FTE/Visitor Parking and Fleet parking and circulation studies are included in RY+AO professional services. D. Communications Tower 1. A&E team shall coordinate the connection of all communication to the City's communication pole or tower, if leased or purchased. The installation of the communication pole or tower shall be provided by others, between the City and the communication tower vendor. 2. We have assumed meeting with the City's BU's, to define functional requirements for the SCADA, Microwave, Radio, DAS, IT/Telecom for the proposed La Quinta operations yards for the purpose of designing the supporting MEP & Low Voltage infrastructure. All design and construction documentation/Bidding can be provided by Design Build contractor procured by the city or retained GC. E. Off -Site Improvements 1. All off -site improvements and utilities are unknown at the submittal of this proposal, therefore assumed not to be a part of this scope of work. 2. Upstream power study and power design to provide the site with more power than is supplied and exists at the site today to support proposed improvements. F. Geotechnical Conditions 1. Geotechnical report shall be provided by the City. Modifications to project resulting from any unknown subsurface geological condition not disclosed in the RFP shall be provided as an additional service. By example, structural foundation design resulting from liquefaction, ground water conditions, remediation of building foundations resulting from insufficient soil bearing values, deep foundations, soil remediation. G. Plumbing 1. Design the plumbing systems including domestic water, waste, vent where required. We will design plumbing systems only to 5 feet from the exterior. All site utilities are by the Civil Engineer. These include, but are not limited to, storm drain, sanitary sewer, domestic water, fire water, natural gas, and foundation drainage. 7 56 2. Sewage ejectors and sump pumps are excluded. We assume these will be gravity systems. 3. We assume a domestic water booster pump is not required. 4. We have excluded the design of grease waste interceptors. H. Fleet Repair Building and Fleet Services 1. Assumption: There are no Fleet Repair services required for this project per RFP. CNG Existing Fueling Tank Move 1. No Process Engineering is included to upgrade the existing CNG facility. RFP specifies the existing CNG Fuel tank shall be moved. Services to move the tank are limited to the following: a. Code Analysis: establish setbacks from property lines and building per the 2022 fire code. b. Evaluate the site plan and establish locations that will meet code requirements for the existing CNG tank relative to appropriate vehicular fueling and Tank service access. Proximity to building setbacks as well as property lines and appropriate location of the tank are included in RY+AO services. J. Fire Protection 1. Design the fire sprinkler system. The design of the fire sprinkler system will consist of performance specifications. The contractor will complete shop drawings and hydraulic calculations and will be the engineer of record for the fire sprinkler system. We assume the base building risers are adequately sized for our use. We have excluded fire protection requirements for high pile storage, CNG fuel station, waste management/disposal station and any specialty fire protection in areas of battery energy systems. 2. We assume a fire pump and a fire water storage tank will not be required. 3. Design the fire alarm system. The design of the fire alarm system will consist of performance specifications and general location of fire alarm devices; the contractor will complete shop drawings and all calculations and will be the engineer of record for the fire alarm system. 4. Architect will retain a dry utility consultant to provide design and coordination with the local utility company for a new electrical service(s) to the project site. 5. We will provide lighting design for both the site and building. We assume all lighting to be utilitarian type. VCL shall specify any specialty lighting is required for this project. 6. Provide conduit infrastructure and point to point connections for voice, data, broadband, or television system and devices based on input from Client or from Client's consultants. 7. Provisions for conduit infrastructure for security devices, backboxes, and conduit for security systems based on the input from Client or from Client's consultants. 8. Design the power connections for building equipment, such as Client -provided equipment. Our documents do not include information that is contained on vendor drawings (such as wiring diagrams, electrical controls, etc.) 8 57 9. Solar PV system is required. We assume this to be by the Owner's vendor or a separate consultant retained by the Architect as an additional service. If requested, we can provide system sizing calculations and a performance specification for the Contractor to design/build the system. Should the City consider PV (other than code required infrastructure), battery energy storage and possibly a Microgrid infrastructure to produce power and possibly provide back-up power for their EV charging infrastructure, A&E shall provide these services as an additional service. K. Electrical Design the electrical normal power for the proposed work. a. A. The RFP does not indicate that an emergency generator is required. It is assumed that the A&E team shall design conduit provisions to allow for connection to a roll -up portable emergency generator. We have excluded the design of Emergency -Power for the entire site. b. B. We assume the EV charging stations will be required to service employee and fleet parking lots which shall be designed to Code minimum. Additional chargers will require additional services fees. c. C. Included in our professional services is consultation to provide design and coordination with the local utility company for a new electrical service(s) to the project site. d. D. We will provide lighting design for both the site and building. We assume all lighting to be utilitarian type. If any specialty lighting is required, the Architect will be required to provide a lighting designer for the project in the event that AT's lighting design studio is not retained. L. Low Voltage/Audio Visual/Security 1. Develop program requirements for Low Voltage Cabling, Audio Visual and Security (access control & video surveillance) Systems. This will include a detailed review of the current programming and design documents developed to date. Work with the Client and project team to define functional and technical requirements. 2. Design the low voltage cable plant for the facility. This will include all horizontal category data cabling, backbone copper/fiber, and Outside Plant (OSP) fiber connectivity necessary to support network connected devices. Network connected devices shall include Wi-Fi Access Points (We have excluded predictive Wi-Fi modelling studies which can be provided as and additional service), hardwired work area outlets, data to support audio visual and data to support security system IP devices. Non -category data cable for audiovisual (Audio, Video, Control etc.) and security (Access Control, Intrusion Detection, etc.) will be designed and specified under each discipline. The intent is for all low voltage data cabling to be included in one comprehensive package for the purpose of bidding and installation. 3. We have excluded all drawings for all low voltage wiring relating to their systems associated the EV charging systems on the site as these are assumed to utilize cellular connectivity. 4. Design the pathway systems for the distribution of the horizontal, and riser backbone cabling infrastructure. Coordinate OSP pathway requirements to the Civil Engineer. 5. Design the ER/MDF and TR/IDF rooms to support all IT infrastructure and Client provided equipment. This will include a review of the power and grounding requirements that are required to support the active equipment to be located within these rooms. 9 58 6. Review plans for the EF/M POE to ensure telco facilities are in place to deliver telco services. Telco services shall be ordered and installed by others. 7. Design the audiovisual systems for the Office and Centralized Employee Facility. We have assumed this will include typical small, medium and large conference rooms for approximately 20% of the floorspace. Per the RFP responses, we have assumed the conference rooms shall double as training rooms. 8. Work with city provided vendor to provide the lowvoltage infrastructure to provide a paging system per the RFP response requirements. 9. Provide bidding and construction administration services for low voltage and audio-visual scopes of work. We excluded the design of a synchronized clock system. M. Lighting Design Services 1. Interior Lighting for both office buildings, enclosed conditioned storage area, area beneath canopy, fleet washing, and parking structure lighting. a. Design ofT-24 compliant lighting b. Lighting Designer to select fixtures and equipment that have a 5+ years warranty and locally sourced Exterior Lighting for laydown areas, surface parking areas, hardscape areas and wayfinding signage lighting for building connectivity on the site. c. Dark Sky compliant d. Lighting Designerto select fixtures and equipment that are appropriate and durable for harsh weather. e. Provide prescriptive -method Title 24 for mechanical, lighting and envelope compliance calculations and forms. If an energy model is required for the project or if performance Title 24 calculations are required, Alfatech will require additional services. f. Coordinate with the structural engineer for all equipment anchorage. All structural calculations and details for anchorage are the responsibility of the structural engineer. g. Coordinate ourworkwith otherteam members. h. If requested by Client, assist the design team and Client in their review and comment on the project cost estimate that is prepared by Client's contractor or cost estimator. i. Prepare CSI-formatted specification documents that describe the design intent. N. Logistics Warehouse & Outdoor Storage 1. All warehouse high pile racking systems shall be coordinated by the A&E in collaboration with the City's warehouse and logistics department. Services of specialized storage needs shall be identified in Programming, between the A&E team and the City. The design of these systems shall be the responsibility of a specialized logistics consultant of the City's choosing. City shall retain the logistics & storage consultant. A&E shall work with the City and its consultant to identify these specialized selections and specification of these systems. 2. Systems shall include but not be limited to the following: high pile racking systems, mezzanine storage, secured storage, small parts conveying & carousel systems, outdoor racking, bar code scanning systems, inventory control systems, etc. 10 59 O. Hazardous Materials A&E surety precludes the design professionals from the identification, consultation, mitigation, abatement, handling, identification / certification / design to address any hazardous materials contained in the geology of the site or hazardous assets which the City anticipates obtaining and storing on -site. P. Primary Structure System of Buildings 1. Assumptions: a. Office and Crew Quarters -Up to twenty-five feet in height, single story office building, constructed with steel, Prefab steel, CMU, or timber framing with a lightweight roof structure made of metal deck or wood. b. Warehouse/Storage -Provisions are provided to develop storage or warehouse buildings if required, each constructed with similar materials, either CMU or concrete tilt -up walls with a lightweight roof structure made of metal deck or wood. c. Assume-12,500 SF of built space per the RFP. d. Parking Canopies. Design for parking canopies are provided. Assumes a typical steel frame design and includes allowance for solar. e. Fleet Maintenance Shop- excluded, not in scope. f. Wash Bay - excluded, not in scope. g. Maintenance Shop -undefined and to be determined. Design Development, Const. documentation, Bidding and Const. Admin. services forthe development of a Maintenance Shop are not included in this scope of work. h. Misc site elements, assumed to be up to three (3) canopies are provided. i. Assume one site lighting pole design. j. We have not included anchorage of warehouse storage and racking systems nor equipment anchorage but can upon request. k. There will be one permit package for the project with all architectural, structural, and other consultant packages submitted concurrently. I. The design and construction of all buildings will occur concurrently. Project phasing may require review of scope and fee. m. Building Information Models (BIM) will contain elements modelled to a Level of Development (LOD) 200, unless otherwise noted. Refer to AIA Document G202- 2013 2. Exclusions: a. Detailed design of secondary structural elements (i.e., window supports, curtain wall supports, exterior cladding, window washing equipment, elevator machine supports and miscellaneous metal supports). b. Landscape structural elements such as site walls, trellis, etc. not specifically noted herein. c. Geotechnical investigation and report d. Material testing and destructive investigation e. Special inspections during construction f. Design of elements for exterior building maintenance g. Preparation of demolition documentation (scope of existing buildings unidentified in the RFP.) h. Engineering or inspection of contractor temporary works such as shoring, bracing, underpinning, or propping. i. Work required to correct non -conforming construction undertaken by the contractor or unforeseen conditions. j. Design of support/bracing/anchorage of mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) systems and furniture, fixtures, and equipment (FF&E) elements k. Services necessary due to significant scope changes or design revisions after Phase I I. Services necessary due to significant schedule extensions or accelerations Q. Dry Utilities 1. Assumptions: a. Client/project/construction team to use utility company drawings and/or designs for construction documents. b. Client/project team to provide project information to the level of detail required to allow for the calculation of future needs and demands and service provisions. c. Assumes client, or their assigned design team member(s) provides onsite and offsite civil, architectural, and landscape base files. d. All City files will be provided to Moran Utility Services, Inc. for use in preparing and submitting to each dry utility company. e. Occasionally dry utility companies require additional offsite base files to be created by civil engineer. Field survey work, by others, may be required to allow full development of base files and designs. f. Assumes utility companies have adequate capacity to accommodate new services. g. Assumes that all existing dry utility facilities will be protected in place and any onsite removals will be complete before our efforts commence. 2. Exclusions: a. Excludes coordination with utilities for the quitclaim of any existing utility easements. b. Separate utility relocations or rearrangement to any existing facilities. c. Separate service extensions, relocations, or revisions to utility connections to neighboring properties. d. Service to irrigation, or other facility meter pedestals. If required, separate work orders can be processed for an additional fee and processed as an addendum if required. e. Any other separate design or coordination services related to offsite system reinforcement work, and/or separate streetlight installation or removal design and/or coordination. f. Separate electric service extension work orders are excluded from this proposal. If the developer or the utility chooses to request these services as separate work orders, a change order would be required. g. Offsite upgrades, underground line reinforcements, processing of fault duty letters, obtaining encroachment permits, and processing EUSERC drawings. h. Location services, field survey, and base file creation. i. Iterative dry utility composite changes mentioned above in scope description are included, excludes significant revisions that result in site changes and redesign efforts. j. Preparation of as-builts. k. Any electrical engineering, private lighting fixture selection, or low voltage system assessment. I. Excludes reproduction or printing costs (client to provide printing account). m. Coordination or design services related to offsite relocations, rearrangements and/or reinforcements. n. Processing of quitclaims of any existing easement vacated during project. 12 61 o. SoCal Gas Relocation(s)/Removal(s). p. Coordination of any utility overhead to underground conversions. R. Civil 1. The following is a partial list of the exclusions applicable to the Civil Services: a. Easements with governing agencies (power, gas, telephone, cable, guy anchors, overhead utility poles) b. Traffic Signal Studies/ Plans/ Modifications/ Reports c. Soils/ Geotechnical consulting d. Analysis of water and sewer systems serving areas adjacent to the proposed project, i.e., the preparation of regional or sub -regional analysis is not included. e. Shoring plans/ Exhibits/ Tie -back documents/ Encroachment Permits f. CEQA / El applications g. Off -Site Street Lighting Plans h. Off -Site Street Improvements i. Post Construction ALTA Survey j. Existing Conditions Topographic Survey- assume Dudek is providing survey + potholing. k. CASp Certification I. Environmental Studies/ Hazardous Remediation's m. Phase 1& 2 Environmental Reports n. Access and Utility Easements / Quitclaim o. Off -Site Sanitary Sewer Flow Studies/ Reports p. Caltrans Coordination & Design Documents q. Record of Survey r. Tentative Parcel Map s. Final Parcel Map (With monumentation) t. Percel Merger / LLA u. Street Right -of -Way Dedication v. Grease Interceptor Design and Sizing w. Traffic Control Plans x. Phasing Plans y. Off -Site Street Improvements Plans, Utility Extensions, Integration of Public Transportation z. Off -Site As -Built Plans aa. Existing Underground Utility Scanning bb. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) - CLOMR and LOMR 13 62 ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT Re: Scope of Services If the Scope of Services include construction, alteration, demolition, installation, repair, or maintenance affecting real property or structures or improvements of any kind appurtenant to real property, the following apply: 1. Prevailing Wage Compliance. If Contracting Party is a contractor performing public works and maintenance projects, as described in this Section 1.3, Contracting Party shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local laws. Contracting Party is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Sections 16000, et seq., (collectively, the "Prevailing Wage Laws"), and La Quinta Municipal Code Section 3.12.040, which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "Public works" and "Maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "Public works" or "Maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if construction work over twenty- five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) and/or alterations, demolition, repair or maintenance work over fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) is entered into or extended on or after January 1, 2015 by this Agreement, Contracting Party agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws including, but not limited to, requirements related to the maintenance of payroll records and the employment of apprentices. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1725.5, no contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a "Public works" project unless registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR") at the time the contract is awarded. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "Public works" or "Maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Contracting Party will maintain and will require all subcontractors to maintain valid and current DIR Public Works contractor registration during the term of this Agreement. Contracting Party shall notify City in writing immediately, and in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours, after receiving any information that Contracting Party's or any of its subcontractor's DIR registration status has been suspended, revoked, expired, or otherwise changed. It is understood that it is the responsibility of Contracting Party to determine the correct salary scale. Contracting Party shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at Contracting Party's principal place of business and at the project site, if any. The statutory penalties for failure to pay prevailing wage or to comply with State wage and hour laws will be enforced. Contracting Party must forfeit to City TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($25.00) per day for each worker who works in excess of the minimum working hours when Contracting Party does not pay overtime. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1810 et seq., eight (8) hours is the legal working day. Contracting Party also shall comply with State law requirements to maintain payroll records and shall provide for certified records and inspection of records as required by California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq., including Section 1776. In addition to the other indemnities provided under this Agreement, Contracting Party shall defend (with counsel selected by City), indemnify, and hold City, Exhibit A 63 Page 2 of 4 its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with performance of the Services, including, without limitation, any and all "Public works" (as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws), Contracting Party shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law and/or the implementation of Labor Code Section 1781, as the same may be amended from time to time, and/or any other similar law. Contracting Party acknowledges and agrees that it shall be independently responsible for reviewing the applicable laws and regulations and effectuating compliance with such laws. Contracting Party shall require the same of all subcontractors. 2. Retention. Not Applicable. 3. Utility Relocation. City is responsible for removal, relocation, or protection of existing main or trunk -line utilities to the extent such utilities were not identified in the invitation for bids or specifications. City shall reimburse Contracting Party for any costs incurred in locating, repairing damage not caused by Contracting Party, and removing or relocating such unidentified utility facilities. Contracting Party shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay arising from the removal or relocation of such unidentified utility facilities. 4. Trenches or Excavations. Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 7104, in the event the work included in this Agreement requires excavations more than four (4) feet in depth, the following shall apply: (a) Contracting Party shall promptly, and before the following conditions are disturbed, notify City, in writing, of any: (1) material that Contracting Party believes may be material that is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class I I I disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law; (2) subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site different from those indicated by information about the site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids; or (3) unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Agreement. (b) City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if it finds that the conditions do materially so differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in Contracting Party's cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work shall issue a change order per Section 1.8 of the Agreement. (c) in the event that a dispute arises between City and Contracting Party whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or increase in Contracting Party's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, Contracting Party shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date provided for by this Agreement, but shall proceed with all work to be performed under this Agreement. Contracting Party shall retain any and all rights provided either by contract Exhibit A 64 Page 3 of 4 or by law which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the contracting Parties. 5. Safety. Contracting Party shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out the Services, Contracting Party shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 6. Liquidated Damages. Not Applicable. Exhibit A 65 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement is not to exceed Two Hundred Twenty -Two Thousand Eight Hundred Six Dollars ($222,806) ("Contract Sum"). The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party in installment payments made on a monthly basis and in an amount identified in Contracting Party's schedule of compensation attached hereto for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement. Phase I shall be paid as a lump -sum on percentage of completion basis not to exceed One Hundred Seventy -One Thousand Two Hundred Six Dollars ($171,206) per attached work schedule. Retention shall be paid on a time and materials basis not to exceed Fifty -One Thousand Six Hundred Dollars ($51,600). Exhibit B 66 Page 1 of 1 Exhibit C Schedule of Performance Contracting Party shall complete all services identified in the Scope of Services, Exhibit A of this Agreement, in accordance with the Project Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Exhibit C 68 Page 1 of 1 ID =.inta Duration Start Finish Predecessors Half 2, 2024 Half1, A N D - Maintenance & Operation Yard Desgin Schedule 2 TOTAL PROJECT DURATION 42.95 Mons Tue 7/16/24 Fri 10/29/27 3 City Jj&Approval for Contract 0 Tue 7/16/24 Tue 7/16/24 * 7/16 4 Contract Award & Mobolization 1.8 wks Tue 7/16/24 Fri 7/26/24 5 Geotech Report by City 8 wks Mon 7/29/24 Fri 9/20/24 �7FS-1 day 6 7 Project Kickoff 0 days Mon 7/29/24 Mon 7/29/24 4FS+1 day 7/29 8 Programming 4 wks Mon 7/29/24 Fri 8/23/24 9 Facilities Surveys & Interview 1 wk Mon 7/29/24 Fri 8/2/24 10 Programming 3 wks Mon 8/5/24 Fri 8/23/24 9 11 All departments Review and Approve Program 3 wks Mon 8/26/24 Fri 9/13/24 10 12 Conceptual Design 4 wks Mon 9/16/24 Fri 10/11/24 13 Conceptual Design 4 wks Mon 9/16/24 Fri 10/11/24 11 14 Field Survey and Base Map 8 wks Tue 7/30/24 Mon 9/23/24 15 Engineering Field Survey 2 wks Tue 7/30/24 Mon 8/12/24 7 16 Base Map 6 wks Tue 8/13/24 Mon 9/23/24 15 17 Phase One Submittal 0 days Mon 9/23/24 Mon 9/23/24 5FS+1 day 9/23 18 City Staff Review & Approval 13 wks Mon 9/23/24 Fri 10/11/24 17FS-1 day 19 Geotech Report - Project go / no go 0 wks Fri 10/11/24 Fri 10/11/24 18 10/11 20 Planning Commission Meeting W 1 wk Mon 10/14/24 Fri 10/18/24 18 21 City Council Study Session = 1 wk Mon 10/21/24 Fri 10/25/24 20 22 City Council Meeting & Approval 4 days Tue 11/5/24 Fri 11/8/24 �21FS+6 day., 23 FORMPTIM 24 Schematic Design 7.2 wks Mon 11/11/24 Mon 12/30/24 25 Schematic Design 7 wks Mon 11/11/24 Fri 12/27/24 22 26 100% SD Submittal 0 days Mon 12/30/24 Mon 12/30/24 25FS+1 day 12/30 27 City Staff Review & Approval 3 wks Mon 12/30/24 Fri 1/17/25 26FS-1 day 28 Design Development 44.2 wks Mon 1/20/25 Mon 11/24/25 29 50%DD 4 wks Mon 1/20/25 Fri 2/14/25 27 30 CEQA by City 9 mons Mon 2/17/25 Fri 10/24/25 29 31 100% DD 4 wks Mon 10/27/25 Fri 11/21/25 30 32 Cost Estimate 2 wks Mon 11/10/25 Fri 11/21/25 31FF 33 100% DD Submittal 0 days Mon 11/24/25 Mon 11/24/25 31FS+1 day 34 City Staff Review & Approval 3 wks Mon 11/24/25 Fri 12/12/25 33FS-1 day 35 eeting proval 34FS+1 day 37 38 Construction Document 50%Construction Document 50%CD Submittal City Staff Review & Approval 100% Construction Document Cost Estimate 100% CD Sbumittal City Staff Review & Approval Building Permit Plan Check IFP (Issued for Plan Check) fit A/E plan check correction IFPtf2 A/E plan check correction IFPtf3 A/E plan check correction Permit Issue Bidding A/E assistant for Bidding Contract Awarded Construction Construction Administration Project Completion 18 wks 6 wks 0 days 3 wks 6 wks 2 wks 0 days 3 wks 17 wks 4 wks 4 wks 2 wks 2 wks 2 wks 2 wks 1 wk 30 wks 8 wks 2 wks 52 wks 52 wks 0 wks Mon 12/22/25 Mon 12/22/25 Mon 2/2/26 Mon 2/2/26 Mon 2/23/26 Mon 3/23/26 Mon 4/6/26 Mon 4/6/26 Mon 4/27/26 Mon 4/27/26 Mon 5/25/26 Mon 6/22/26 Mon 7/6/26 Mon 7/20/26 Mon 8/3/26 Mon 8/17/26 Mon 8/24/26 Mon 8/24/26 Mon 10/19/26 Mon 11/2/26 Mon 11/2/26 Fri 10/29/27 Fri 4/24/26 Fri 1/30/26 Mon 2/2/26 Fri 2/20/26 Fri 4/3/26 Fri 4/3/26 Mon 4/6/26 Fri 4/24/26 Fri 8/21/26 Fri 5/22/26 Fri 6/19/26 Fri 7/3/26 Fri 7/17/26 Fri 7/31/26 Fri 8/14/26 Fri 8/21/26 Fri 10/30/26 Fri 10/16/26 Fri 10/30/26 Fri 10/29/27 Fri 10/29/27 Fri 10/29/27 35 38FS+1 day 38 40 41FF 41FS+1 day 43FS-1 day 44 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 54 53 55 57 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 11/24 Half 1, 2/2 4/6 lE RY+A.0 Half 2, 2027 10/29 Project: La Quinta Maintenance & Operations Yard Tasks Summary r----1 Tasks I Inactive Milestone Manual Task Manual Summary Rollup Stan -only C Wemal Tasks Deadline + Manual Progress Date: Wed 6/12/24 Project Milestone * Project Summary r ---------- I Inactive Task Inactive Summary 0 E Duration -only i. Manual Summary r ---------- — I Finish -only 7 Wemal Milestone + Progress Page 1 b� None Exhibit D Special Requirements Exhibit D Page 1 of 1 70 Exhibit E Insurance Requirements E.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of this Agreement, the following policies shall be maintained and kept in full force and effect providing insurance with minimum limits as indicated below and issued by insurers with A.M. Best ratings of no less than A -VI: Commercial General Liability (at least as broad as ISO CG 0001) $1,000,000 (per occurrence) $2,000,000 (general aggregate) Must include the following endorsements: General Liability Additional Insured General Liability Primary and Non-contributory Commercial Auto Liability (at least as broad as ISO CA 0001) $1,000,000 (per accident) Auto Liability Additional Insured Personal Auto Declaration Page if applicable Errors and Omissions Liability $1,000,000 (per claim and aggregate) Workers' Compensation (per statutory requirements) Must include the following endorsements: Workers Compensation with Waiver of Subrogation Workers Compensation Declaration of Sole Proprietor if applicable Cyber Liability $1,000,000 (per occurrence) $2,000,000 (general aggregate) Contracting Party shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, Commercial General Liability insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Contracting Party's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Contracting Party's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contracting Party's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. An endorsement evidencing the foregoing and naming the City and its officers and employees as additional insured (on the Commercial General Liability policy only) must be submitted concurrently with the execution of this Agreement and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. Exhibit E 71 Page 1 of 6 Contracting Party shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by Contracting Party, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by Contracting Party, any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Contracting Party's performance under this Agreement. If Contracting Party or Contracting Party's employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Contracting Party shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person. The term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi -trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contracting Party's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Contracting Party and "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must "pay on behalf of the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this agreement. Contracting Party shall carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker's Compensation laws with employer's liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Contracting Party shall procure and maintain Cyber Liability insurance with limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence/loss which shall include the following coverage: a. Liability arising from the theft, dissemination and/or use of confidential or personally identifiable information; including credit monitoring and regulatory fines arising from such theft, dissemination or use of the confidential information. b. Network security liability arising from the unauthorized use of, access to, or tampering with computer systems. c. Liability arising from the failure of technology products (software) required under the contract for Consultant to properly perform the services intended. d. Electronic Media Liability arising from personal injury, plagiarism or misappropriation of ideas, domain name infringement or improper deep - linking or framing, and infringement or violation of intellectual property rights. Exhibit E 72 Page 2 of 6 e. Liability arising from the failure to render professional services. If coverage is maintained on a claims -made basis, Contracting Party shall maintain such coverage for an additional period of three (3) years following termination of the contract. Contracting Party shall provide written notice to City within ten (10) working days if: (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; or (3) the deductible or self -insured retention is increased. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, Contracting Party shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with this Exhibit to the Contract Officer. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Contracting Party's obligation to indemnify City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents. E.2 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Contracting Party fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. b. Order Contracting Party to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contracting Party hereunder until Contracting Party demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate this Agreement. Exercise any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies City may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Contracting Party's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contracting Party may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contracting Party's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. E.3 General Conditions Pertaining to Provisions of Insurance Coverage by Contracting Party. Contracting Party and City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Contracting Party: 1. Contracting Party agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City, its officials, employees, and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010 with an edition 04/13. Contracting Party also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Contracting Party, or Contracting Party's employees, or agents, from waiving the Exhibit E 73 Page 3 of 6 right of subrogation prior to a loss. Contracting Party agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contracting Party and available or applicable to this Agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called "third party action over" claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Contracting Party shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City's protection without City's prior written consent. 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Contracting Party's general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Contracting Party or deducted from sums due Contracting Party, at City option. 8. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Contracting Party or any subcontractor, is intended to apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. 9. Contracting Party agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project that is brought onto or involved in the project by Contracting Party, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Contracting Party. Contracting Party agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Contracting Party agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. 10. Contracting Party agrees not to self -insure or to use any self -insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein (with the Exhibit E 74 Page 4 of 6 exception of professional liability coverage, if required) and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self -insure its obligations to City. If Contracting Party's existing coverage includes a deductible or self -insured retention, the deductible or self -insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the Contracting Party, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self -insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 11. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of this Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Contracting Party ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Contracting Party, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City. 12. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 13. Contracting Party acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Contracting Party of non-compliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 14. Contracting Party will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect. 15. Contracting Party shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Contracting Party's insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and an additional insured endorsement is required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five (5) days of the expiration of coverages. 16. The provisions of any workers' compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Contracting Party under this agreement. Contracting Party expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials, and agents. 17. Requirements of specific coverage features, or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a Exhibit E 75 Page 5 of 6 given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all-inclusive. 18. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 19. The requirements in this Exhibit supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Exhibit. 20. Contracting Party agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Contracting Party for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. It is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. 21. Contracting Party agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Contracting Party arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City. Exhibit E 76 Page 6 of 6 Exhibit F Indemnification F.1 Indemnitv for the Benefit of Ci a. Indemnification for Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party's Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party. b. Indemnification for Other Than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses) incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contracting Party or by any individual or entity for which Contracting Party is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors of Contracting Party. C. Indemnity Provisions for Contracts Related to Construction (Limitation on Indemnity). Without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this agreement, Contracting Party shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City for liability attributable to the active negligence of City, provided such active negligence is determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where City is shown to have been actively negligent and where City's active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the obligation of Contracting Party will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of City. Contracting Party shall reimburse City for reasonable defense costs incurred. Exhibit F 77 Page 1 of 2 d. Indemnification Provision for Design Professionals. 1. Applicability of this Section F.1(d). Notwithstanding Section F.1(a) hereinabove, the following indemnification provision shall apply to a Contracting Party who constitutes a "design professional" as the term is defined in paragraph 3 below. 2. Scope of Indemnification. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party's Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, reimbursement of attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party. 3. Design Professional Defined. As used in this Section F.1(d), the term "design professional" shall be limited to licensed architects, registered professional engineers, licensed professional land surveyors and landscape architects, all as defined under current law, and as may be amended from time to time by Civil Code § 2782.8. F.2 Obligation to Secure Indemnification Provisions. Contracting Party agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth herein this Exhibit F, as applicable to the Contracting Party, from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contracting Party in the performance of this Agreement. In the event Contracting Party fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contracting Party agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this Exhibit. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth in this Agreement are binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contracting Party and shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Exhibit F 78 Page 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT 3 DRAF Lei Prepared by Gillis + Panichapan Architegg, Inc. DRAFT�r_ll 1:K•1rK•1'Ll k IaLl k K I TABLE OF CONTENTS . . .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... i k6kitt INTRODUCTION............................ ............. wt EXECUTIVE -SUMMARY..... .......... .......... .......... 01. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 02 GOAL,$ AND, OBJECTIVES............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 00. METHODOLOGY .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 94 DE * LIVERABLES 6 * 06 PROJECT TEAM 06 PROJECT LOCATION ..6. .THE EXISTING LOCATION ........... 09 ASSESSMENT * * * * * * * OF * E * XIS * TI * NG * FACILITIS * * E 1.0 THE EXISTING BUILDINGS NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS 10 UMMARY OF..EXISTING G CONDITIONS SUMMARY 13 SPACE RtdUlk...W............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ ..... SPACE NEEDS VALIDATION -- EXISTING, CURRENT, AND FUTURE ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 15 ASSIGNAB.LE.(NET). SPWE FOOT/USABLE NET SQUARE FOOT/GROSS SQUARE FOOT ....................................... ......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 16 SUMMARY OF DATA SHEET INFORMATION .................................. -.- SHEET -.- ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 16 S.U.M.M.A.RY�.P.E.R.�.F.U.N�C.T.I�O.N�A.L.�G.R�O.U.P�..� .......... .......... .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. ............... -1.8 SUMMARY PER SPACE TYPE .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 19 .......... .......... .......... .......... -.- EXISTING EMPLOYEE COUNT -.- .......... I -.- -.- .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 20 .......... -.- EXISTING BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE ............... .................. ..................................................... .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .................. .......................... 21 EXISTING SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 22 PROPOSED- PUBLIC WORKS .................. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 23 PROPOSED- FACILITIES .................................. 24 - P.R.O.P.O.S..E..D.-...PA.R..K�S./.LA.N.D.S..C.A.P..E .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... 26 PROPOSED-...S.T.R.E.E.T.S ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 2.8. PROPOSED- * * * TRAFFIC * * * *** 30 * PROPOSED-...C.O.M.M,O.�N�..A.R.E.A.S ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 3.2. PROMM.6ED-FLEETNEHICLE.S... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... .......... ............ 33 PROPOSED SITE...................................................................................................................................... -34. COMPARISON TO 2008 DESIGN CRITERIA, MAINTENANCE YARD MASTER PLAN 35 SPACE STANDARDS ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... SPACESTANDARDS .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4.1. LEGEND/EXAMPLE 42 .............................................................................................................................................. 43 44 eca 0"&(v GEM qfth, D 41,SERT www.gparchftects.org City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 1 of 1 ......................................................... PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK............................................................... cc& QulV &(v GEM of the DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page H of H www.gparchitects.org DRAFT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Gillis and Panichapan Architects Inc. (GPa) was appointed to complete this facilities assessment to help the City quantify the magnitude and costs of reconfiguring the existing 2.8 acres site for the City of La Quinta Corporate Yard, The City intends to construct a new corporation yard building to house its Maintenance Office, Crew Quarters, Secondary Emergency Operations Center, and if feasible ambulance services. It is also intended to adjust and/ or modify the related exterior enclosed storage facilities. The City's Maintenance Yard Master Plan was originally prepared in 2008 and may or may not represent the current need. In addition to the Maintenance Yard Master Plan prepared in 2008, City staff had prepared a facility needs assessment in 2018 as part of the La Quinta Academy work. The community is also requesting eight additional pickle ball courts be added to the existing amenities within Fritz Burns Park. Any additional park amenities will require additional parking capacity. GPa will review the existing and proposed uses within the 10-acre shared site to determine if additional pickle ball courts and associated parking can be accommodated and where. The amount of space determined for the reconfiguration of the City of La Quinta Corporate Yard depended on several key factors, including the number and deployment of staff to be accommodated, expectations of operational needs (levels of service, types of equipment, etc.), allowances made for operational support areas (such as locker rooms, meeting areas, training areas, etc,), the needs for special operational areas, and calculation of circulation and access needed within the site. The computations of these elements were based on a sequence of intensive evaluation beginning with data collection and analysis of each functional group. The data collected were then juxtaposed to long established industry and government standards and refined based on specific operational needs. The data showcased in this report illustrates the projected quantity as well as square footage and adjacency requirements for each division considering both current and future needs. The report tabulates the data onto charts, translates it into space standards which are then developed into the site diagram that illustrate a more effective and efficient site layout for the future facility. The site diagram is used as the basis for developing a statement of probable costs of the potential future facility. This allows the Cityto analyze the needs on an individual functional group basis, and also to examine how individual functional groups together can share amenities (space and resources) for overall efficiency in operations as well as cost effectiveness in building a new facility. The methods, as well as, the results of the investigation documented in this report demonstrate that the building space offered by the current existing facility is not adequate for the current and future calculated needs for an optimum operational efficiency. Please note that with each iterative process, the square footage will become more refined and does not necessarily reflect the initial overall square footage depicted in the space requirements charts. This occurs in part to industry standard circulation factor that was applied to the square footage found in the space requirements charts. This circulation factor was refined through the use of central spine (hallway) that minimized the need for additional circulation/hallways. With this, the building square footage was reduced while maintaining the functional needs of the facility. eca 0"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 82 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report www.gparchitects.org Page 01 of 67 DRAFT INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to determine the essential current and future program needs for the Corporate Yard Facilities and to quantify the needs for a potential reconfiguration of the facilities. The assessment was based on the current and future needs of the organization, each of its functional groups, along with requirements of individual staff, and a review of the overall operational needs of the City. Current and future furnishings, fixtures, and equipment also played a role in tallying space requirements and establishing standards for the requirements of the future campus. The assessment of future needs is intended to accommodate build out of the City as envisioned in the Master Plan. Currently, the operations functions for the City of La Quinta Corporate Yard are sited within a campus at 78106 Frances Hack Lane. The newly reorganized Corporate Yard- Facilities, Parks/Landscape, Streets, and Traffic Operations compose the current existing campus. Storage for community events as well as backup emergency services storage is currently located on -site and will be a part of the overall needs assessment. Some of the supervising offices and functional groups are located in City Hall, but with the new reorganization, all of the Corporate Yard will be accommodated at the Corporate Yard site. The reconfiguration of the facilities can provide an opportunity for the City to consolidate and improve operations, provide efficient and adequate work space for City staff, and better serve its residents. The Final report will includes a conceptual site block plan based off the future space requirements noted above. While conceptual in nature, the analysis focused on identifying the essential required areas and optimal spatial adjacencies to portray the required potential site parameters. Lastly, the conceptual site plan is used as the basis for developing a preliminary cost estimate to determine the financial feasibility of the new facilities. The following is a facilities assessment report that examines the overall challenges, programmatic and space needs for the City of La Quinta Corporate Yard to determine a course of action in terms of acquiring a new site that fits with the essential needs of the facilities now and into the future. This report assesses the conceptual size and configuration of the campus for the existing site; • Detailed Summary of Office, Shops, Support Spaces, Interior Storage, Exterior Covered Storage and Exterior Open Storage Space Needs (along with associated parking and circulation) • Recommendations for Site Area Required • Recommendations for Building Area Required • Preliminary Estimates Cost for Buildings and Site Work (Stage 2/Final Report) CC& Quiv &(V GEM of the DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 02 of 67 www.gparchitects.org t DRAFT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES The goal of the facilities assessment report is to quantify the amount of space that would be needed to enable the organization to operate more efficiently and effectively to meet the future needs of the City as envisioned in the Master Plan. This following facilities assessment will outline some of the essential requirements associated with the reconfiguration of the City of La Quinta Corporate Yard. This report will address the upgrades and space needs of the organization at a programmatic level. Key items are assessed and reviewed for overall impact to function and spatial organization for the current and future facility in this report. The objective of this assessment is to quantify programmatic needs, size and parameters, and to determine an overall scheme that would be most optimal creating a "checklist" of essential requirements for the potential reconfigured site. METHODOLOGY In order to correctly identify the spatial requirements of the City of La Quinta Corporate Yard we worked closely with selected team members throughout the facilities assessment process. In the initial meeting, we presented the firm's planning approach, and over the course of several weeks we conducted several interactive meetings or "workshops" with team members to present and discuss the current and future operational plans. These workshops helped confirm current and future needs, project expectations, and time -line. Pertinent information for this document was collected through these interactive workshops. In addition, we conducted a tour of the existing facilities and made observations on its current operations, and assessed how current and future needs would integrate optimally and efficiently at the site. We compared our information to the phased plans and existing building information summaries from Design Criteria- Maintenance Yard Master Plan, City of La Quinta, California completed in 2008. These methods listed below helped identify potential programming solutions for the future facility. • Kick-off meeting • The assessment was initiated with an introductory meeting with the City representative team members to convey GPa's programming approach. This meeting established project expectations, product deliverables, and time -line for this stage and the overall needs assessment process beyond. The kick- off meeting was followed concurrently with a facility survey. • Facility Survey • Prior to the formal reassessment stages, GPa conducted a general survey of the existing spaces and inventory of essential furniture fixtures and equipment for the campus facility. We assessed and documented equipment storage needs indoor and out at the operations portion of the campus to verify and update the 2008 Master plan. On an individual staff scale, notably in the administrative functions, we assessed the needs for everyday tasks in terms of space, equipment, and furniture and the relationship to their individual departments. We assessed requirements for shared space and amenities needed; quantity of staff, conference rooms, equipment and storage requirements and inter -connections between departments. Much of this data was collected through observations and interviews conducted through chosen City representatives. • On a campus level we investigated site boundaries, zoning, and setbacks would be reviewed to eca 0"&a GEM afthe DESERT — — 84 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report www.gparchitects.org Page 03 of 67 DRAFT determine the best positioning and areas allocated for various functions, parking, and circulation areas needed. We also performed visual assessments on topography, views, context of the site for program placement. This brought about the quality and constraints of a specific site to light as it relates to the organization of the new proposed facility on a programmatic level. Interviews and Documentation • Next, we worked interactively with the City assigned team members to provide an analysis of the current facility needs. This can be done via conference call or online meeting coordination. This information was used to document computed space requirements for the future facility. For an effective assessment, assigned team members should be representative of all levels of the organization chart (i.e. Department Head, Supervisor, and Staff). • Both existing and projected space needs is provided in a graphed chart per personnel and department. A summary each with charts describing needed spaces per individual department and staff by title and description, along with projected areas anticipated would be provided. Workshops • During the process of documentation, organized workshops were provided to share our findings. We planned on having two workshops as the programming document develops. Draft space programming documents was presented for input and guidance for iterative refinements. • The process will provide and review the following; • Projection of staff levels in administration and operations to compare • Suggested work space layout- depict optimal furniture layout for work areas and individual personnel areas. Suggested furniture space layout concepts for common spaces per department and the overall Department would be provided. Each space will be correspondingly charted by size, type, and description. Associated information for parking tallies for personnel and public spaces will also be provided. • Spaceadjacency- portrays diagrams demonstrating preferred relationships between each personnel and/ or respective support spaces. • Storage needs for Operations; could include department vehicles, specialized equipment. • Site Parking requirements and outdoor amenities. • Needs for use as an agency emergency operations center. • Projection of needed public spaces After obtaining a general idea of the operations and space CC& Quti &a GEM of the DESERT NEEDS ASSESSMENT —_—__—_—__—_———————EL �/ KICK OFF MEETING' O z I I' FACILITY SURVEY' a a I I INTERVIEWS & DOCUMENTATION I WORKSHOPSi Z ------------------ STAGE 1 REPORT 1 SPACE PROGRAM: ING —— — — — — — — — — —� ---- - ------ - - ------- 1 I CAMPUS PLAN DIAGRAM! Y g 1 I' BUILDING PLAN DIAGRAMU a� I PRESENTATIONS, m Q 1 r` WORKSHOPSi- -----------------01 — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — STAGE 2 REPORT 1 CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLANNING — — — — — — — — — — — —N- — — I 1 I CONCEPTUAL MASTER CAMPUS PLAN I I CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLAN I I ZONING EGRESS, & CODE REVIEW I STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST,' — — — — — — — — — — — —— — — EXECUTIVE REPORT & SUMMARY 85 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 04 of 67 www.gparchitects.org DRAFT � PROJECT �LPN F: needs, we gathered the information and compiled a space facilities assessment document in the form of data charts that illustrates the current space/area requirements. This information can be found in Section 3- Space Requirements. Both depict required area in square feet. We developed the office space standards to depict typical required room layouts for the future facility (found in Section 4 - Space Standards). We used this information to develop the proposed block diagrams for each functional group illustrating required and ideal space adjacencies. These space adjacencies were then assembled in a site scheme to depict an ideal future campus/ space configuration for the new site. These block diagrams would convey the ideal size, positioning, and location of spaces drawn to scale. Individual private offices, open offices, restrooms, storage, and common spaces etc. would be depicted within along with main circulation areas. Distinctions between public and secure personnel space would be depicted along with zones of site circulation corridors, and public and personnel access control. On a site level, it can depict zones of designated parking, secure areas, outdoor storage, and shaded protected zones. Block Diagram Development (Parti Diagram) This stage would offer a twofold direction with diagrams depicting how spaces and programs would optimally interconnect: • Campus Plan Diagram- Provide Layout in context of existing Campus. A new Parti Master Plan placed conceptually on the current site: On top of the current campus plan, we would superimpose a scaled space adjacency diagrams depicting specific spaces in relation to their location and their associated sizes. This would also show the possible scale and configuration of the new footprint on top of the current facility site to provide context for advantages and limitations on the current facility site in terms of space and access. • Building Diagram Plan (New Administration Building or other buildings): On top of the campus plan, we would provide a detailed space parti diagram for a new administration building space and other buildings if determined needed by the programming documents that have been developed by this stage. Presentation and Workshops • After the completion of the initial block diagrams, we would organize interactive workshops with team members to present them, gather input, and gage reaction during these meetings. Iterative refinements will be made to the diagrams after sessions with the City team. • An associated Conceptual Statement of Probable Cost (SoPC) will be developed for the block diagram scheme based on a current construction cost index on the general proposed building area on a unit cost calculation. • This will assist the City to decide the best direction to move forward for budget and effectiveness for developing the future facility. Final Report • A final report booklet will be provided to formally organize: • Colored block diagram layouts drawn to scale: Campus Parti diagram as well as Individual Building Parti Diagram • Summary of critical needs for the site in terms of clearances, access, minimum sizes, etc. • This report will contain information and assessments that will be the foundation of the development of a formal campus master plan and architectural floor plan. This option would develop the plan that would move forward to the next formal stage of assessment. DELIVERABLES c� CV 0"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 86 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report www.gparchitects.org Page 05 of 67 This project includes the following deliverables for the Stage 1 Report; • Space Needs Validation (See Section 3- Space Requirements) • Space Standards Diagrams (See Section 4- Space Standards) PROJECT TEAM We worked closely together with the City of La Quinta and NAI Consulting which reviewed the project progress and provided necessary information pertaining to the project. This team consisted of the following members; John McMillen City Manager - City of La Quinta Gil Villalpando Assistant to City Manager - City of La Quinta Bryan McKinney Public Works Director - City of La Quinta Julie Mignogna Management Analyst - City of La Quinta Nick Nickerson Project Manager - NAI Consulting The team of consultants facilitating this study included the following key members; Jack Panichapan, AIA Miranda Luce Principal in Charge, Gillis + Panichapan Architects, Inc. Designer, Gillis + Panichapan Architects, Inc. GEM of the DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 06 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT �7►1� PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK W 0"&(V GEM ofth,DESERT — — www.gparchftects.org City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 07 of 67 ......................................................... PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK............................................................... cc& QulV &(v GEM of the DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 08 of 67 www.gparchitects.org DRAFT � THE EXISTING LOCATION The City's Corporate Yard is located at 78106 Frances Hack Lane. The Existing Corporate Yard accommodated the following operations, which have a citywide service area: • Streets, Parks, Facilities, and Landscape Maintenance Division • Traffic Operations • Emergency Services • Event Storage • Surplus Storage • Archive Storage The existing corporate yard shares a 10-acre site with the Park and Fire Station 32. The Park contains a swimming pool, a playground, an open field, picnic tables and benches, restrooms, 6 tennis courts, 8 pickle ball courts, a skate park, a dog park, off-street parking, and a former fire station that is leased to a private ambulance service. Fire Station 32 was constructed as part of the Corporate Yard Phase I Improvements in 2009 and meets the City's current standard and need. fti6.. I N EXISTING AERIAL SITE PLAN scale- n.t.s. eca 0"&(V GEM ofth,DESERT — — �� City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 09 of 67 TWOPROJECT LOCATION ASSESSMENT OF EXISTING FACILITIES The following summary describes the condition of the existing facilities, their respective location on the site, and purpose of each individual building/ structure. GPa obtained information and documents from the original assessment completed in April 2008 by PB Americas, Inc. titled Design Criteria- Maintenance Yard Master Plan, City of La Quinta, California. With additional analysis and survey, the information in the 2008 document were assessed, updated, and revised based on observations of the current conditions and how they are being used at the present time. The plans depicted within this report show the updated use of space, the alterations of covered parking, and alterations to the site layout (which will be developed in Stage 2). THE CORPORATE YARD SITE: Total Buildings: 10,130sf Employee, City Vehicle and Visitor Parking: 41,580sf Yard Storage: 18,618sf Landscaping and Circulation Allowance: 51,640sf Total Existing Site Area 2.8 acres THE EXISTING BUILDINGS NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS The following is highlighted notes of each of the existing individual buildings' functions and issues on the existing campus based on GPa's observations layered on top of diagrams from the original 2008 report. ADMINISTRATION/PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING Size: 2,160sf (trailer) The administration building contains the offices for Corporate Yard. Some of the issues facing the current facility: • Functional groups are not together and are in disparate spaces. There is not enough communal workspace. • There is a lack of sufficient common areas. • Space is not large enough to accommodate restructured Corporate Yard. • There is a lack of storage space. • Generally, the building is run down and too small. Replaced with a new 36' x 60' trailer. Size: 2100sf The new trailer contains a new single user women's and men's restroom and open office space. From observation of the plan set: • There appears to be a lack of sufficient common areas- conference room, multi -purpose room, etc. • There appears to be a lack of storage space. CC& QuoI&a GEM of the DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 10 of 67 www.gparchffects.org `.t L41-- DRAFT VITA1101 OLD PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING Size; 2,360sf This building acts as the general shop and storage for what is now called the Streets and Parks/Landscape functional groups. It also acts as a storage and work shop for Traffic Operations. Some of the issues facing the current facility, • The building was not meant to act as a storage/warehouse facility. The current space is too small to accommodate the storage needs of the department. • Makeshift creation of locker areas. • Overcrowded storage areas, shops, workspaces, and lockers. • Mix of uses and disorganization between the trades sharing work areas with informal boundaries. • Lack of clearances for accommodating safe and adequate work. • Disorganized layout between Functional Area spaces. • Currently, the warehouse, although organized, is over capacity with materials and equipment stored on pallets outside the building. • There is not enough clearance for inventory to be moved and organized within the warehouse. • Vendors and customers also have problems identifying a formal location for check -in and receiving. • In the Shop - No room for large prints- furnishings and equipment need to be constantly moved around to accomplish daily tasks. • Ceiling height not tall enough to stack additional supplies with the use of a forklift. EMT BUILDING - OLD FIRE STATION Size; 5,160sf This building is rented out to the City's EMT services. GPa was not able to survey and observe the interior condition of the building. The City has approved the potential demolition of this structure. EMT Services tenants to be relocated. SHIPPING CONTAINER STORAGE Size; 1,840sf The City currently uses 5 shipping containers to house surplus storage. Some of the issues facing the current facility, • Overcrowded/disorganized storage areas. • Mix of uses and disorganization between the trades sharing work areas with informal boundaries. • Lack of clearances for accommodating safe and adequate work. • Disorganized layout between Division spaces. TOOL STORAGE Size; 320sf The City currently use a shipping container to house all the functional groups' tools. Some of the issues facing the current facility, • Overcrowded/disorganized storage areas. • Mix of uses and disorganization between the trades sharing work areas with informal boundaries. • Disorganized layout between Division spaces. eca 0"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 92 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report www.gparchitects.org Page 11 of 67 DRAFT PAINT STORAGE Size: 1 12sf This building is currently used as paint storage for all functional groups. Some of the issues facing the current facility: • Overcrowded/disorganized storage areas. • Mix of uses and disorganization between the trades sharing work areas with informal boundaries. • Disorganized layout between Division spaces. EXISTING AERIAL SITE PLAN N scale- n.t.s. T eca 01d4&(V GEM ofth,DESERT — — City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 12 of 67 www.gparchitects.org DRAFT VITA1101 EXISTING COVERED PARKING The existing covered canopies are in good condition. Currently, these areas are large enough to accommodate the current and future fleet vehicle parking needs of the City. These structures are to remain in place and the proposed solution to be developed around the existing canopy layout, if possible. SUMMARY OF EXISTING CONDITIONS Much of the lack of space and inefficient configuration in the City's current facility resulted over many decades of doing what was needed to accomplish daily tasks within the constraints of the existing infrastructure as the needs of the City grew and evolved. The existing facilities at the site met the codes at the time of the original construction but do not meet current codes, are in poor condition, and are not large enough to accommodate current and future needs. This facilities assessment will provide the City a map and guideline to develop a master plan that can be organized into a well -planned strategy for future growth at the existing site to prevent many of the inefficiencies currently occurring today and better prepare for the evolving future of operations. Oca O"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 94 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 13 of 67 ......................................................... PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK............................................................... cc& QulV &(v GEM of the DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 14 of 67 www.gparchitects.org DRAFT SPACE REQUIREMENTS THREE k iv SPACE NEEDS VALIDATION - EXISTING, CURRENT, AND FUTURE The previous section describes existing deficiencies within the current facilities. The space needs validation section categorizes the space for the current and future facility needs and documents the results through the following charts. The space needs depicted in the charts are classified in three distinct categories, existing, current, and future. "Existing" represents the amount of space the existing facilities provide as of the preparation of this report. (This designation is not depicted in the following charts- "existing" is usually depicted for context in a facility that considers the option of expansion and renovation within their existing site/ building(s). "Current" represents the space needed to satisfy the current level of staffing while allowing for operational growth based on the GPa review of the City Facilities. "Future" identifies the total (or incremental) space that would be needed based on future staffing projections provided by the City's executive management team. Future staffing projections were developed based on potential areas of growth or changes in business requirements, but are utilized only for space planning purposes. The Space Needs Validation Assessment is composed of charting area requirements that are used in creating space standards for each type of space respective of each department for the City. SPACE STANDARD The space standards were developed in several iterative stages from the industry standards to meet the City's needs. The development of space standards has been a result of (a) review of existing operational requirements and working conditions of each person, (b) consideration of existing and projected activities, (c) analysis of established standards in use in other agencies, (d) consideration of future trends and the needs and flexibility and adaptability to new activities, and (e) discussion with the various members and personnel of the City. COMPUTATION OF SPACE REQUIREMENTS The calculation of space requirements for each of the functions and operations in the department was accomplished in large part by applying space standards to the staff levels or to the projected support areas required to perform Department functions. The requirement details are tabulated on data sheets for each Functional Group. These detail sheets show items, space standards used, projected quantities, and appropriate square footage requirements at each of the projection levels. *Please refer to the following pages. eca (2"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 96 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 15 of 67 11001 kol A DRAFT ASSIGNABLE (NET) SQUARE FOOT / USABLE NET SQUARE FOOT / GROSS SQUARE FOOT ASSIGNABLE (NETT SQUARE FOOT In the following space conversions, the floor area allocated to required labeled rooms/ spaces/ items is called Assignable Sq. Ft." USABLE NET SQUARE FOOT To this a "unit circulation" allowance is added, which produces the "Usable Net Sq. Ft." for that unit. The unit circulation allows for interior circulation paths, which may be open/ informal or may be designed as walled/ formal inner corridors inside a unit. The main corridors of the building, and the other areas which are not assignable to the users in the office suites, is generally part of the net -to -gross addition. The usable net sq. ft. omits major corridors, elevator shafts, mechanical shafts, exterior and interior wall thicknesses, structural elements, mechanical and equipment rooms, and other non -user specific elements of the building. To account for this necessary addition, it is customary to use a factor by which the net square footage is increased, called, variously, "the efficiency," or "net -to -gross," or "gross -up" factor for the building. This can be expressed as a multiplier (like 1.25, a multiplier applied to the net sq. ft. to arrive at the gross) or as a ratio percentage (like 80%, the ratio of the net sq. ft. to the final gross sq. ft.). In this project we suggest using the typical net -to -gross multiplier of 1.25. However, note there are many examples of building design in which a greater or lesser efficiency is achieved. One certain situation where a greater multiplier is used is in an industrial space standard where a multiplier of up to 1.6 is used in some cases to account for clearances in equipment and machinery. Another variable is the use of atriums or greater skin -to -floor -area ratio, which lowers efficiency; when atrium space is not listed in a net allowance, it must be accounted for in a higher gross -up. Use of simpler, linear design typically increases the efficiency. As a general rule, to allow for various contingencies, it is typical for space programmers to use lower efficiencies in the earlier planning of the building, so that the space layout team (the building designers and architects) have more latitude to work with. SUMMARY OF DATA SHEET INFORMATION The following are Summary Validation Form Data Sheets: SUMMARY PER FUNCTIONAL GROUP: The following chart depicts Total Area required per Functional Group summary. This chart summary shows the total area required for each individual department at the current year of this assessment (2019) along with anticipated current employees. It also includes possible future employee growth to account for the potential space. SUMMARY PER SPACE TYPE: Type of Overall Spaces required per Functional Group summary: This summary depicts spaces subdivided by labeled space type respectively to the area needed for each functional group. For each department a proportion is depicted on the amount of space needed under seven labeled space types: officel , office2, office -plumbing, warehouse, shop/storage, covered canopy, and exterior spaces. The description of each space type can be found in the following pages. cc& Qm�&a GEM of the DESERT 97 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 16 of 67 www.gparchitects.org DRAFT 1001 kol A 9 The following charts provide a detailed list of spaces required by each individual functional group and their associated spaces. Each functional group is reflected with its own individual chart tallying all the anticipated spaces required for building interior and site requirements. The charts are then subdivided into categories: job title and respective office space needed, common areas and/ or support areas for the functional group, and the related site and parking requirements. It is beneficial to note that the projection of future staff in each functional group will not necessarily increase the overall space proportionally to the projected growth of personnel. There are areas designated as support spaces or common areas that are shared among the staff or across functional groups. These spaces may be designated as conference rooms, lunch rooms, training rooms, etc. and are used intermittently among various personnel as well as functional groups. These charts rely on office standard diagrams located in the following pages to provide a visual concept of what type of space and their associated layout is needed for each department. Between looking at the data sheets and the office standard diagrams one can obtain the general scope and size of each functional group based on the current and projected staff. LEGEND FOR THE CHARTS For an additional explanation of each category below please refer to the following pages. Group 1: Projections Existing, Current, and Future Group 2: Space Type OFF] = Office (Typical Office Space) OFF2 = Office (Office Type II) OFF-P = Office (Plumbing) CC = Covered Canopy EX = Exterior Space SH/STO = Shop WH = Warehouse Group 3: Office Type PO = Private Office WS = Work Station Group 4: General CIRC = Circulation Factor SF = Square Feet DEPT = Department FT = Full Time Personnel PT = Part Time Personnel �I W 0"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 98 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 17 of 67 11001 ;7 SUMMARY PER FUNCTIONAL GROUP Total Area per Total Head Department Count Public Works Facilities Parks/Landscape Streets Common Areas Fleet Parking 0 0 Count c c 1, U- y 463 146 2 0 2 0 1,518 907 5 1 6 1 401 1,207 6 1 7 1 2,807 135 6 2 8 1 800 1,223 0 5 5 1 1,869 3,361 52,944 1,425 60, 801 8,4031 19 28 Total Parking Area C N 7 V � � LL 1,350 0 2,700 450 3,150 450 3,150 900 01 2,700 10,3501 4,500 DRAFT City of La ®uinta Fleet Parking 41,5801 -5, 760 41,5801 -5, 760 TOTAL AREA PER 69,204 SF DEPARTMENT: 1.59 ACRES EMPLOYEE 28 EMPLOYEE & VISITOR PARKING 32 EMPLOYEE & VISITOR PARKING AREAJ 14,850 CITY OF LA AUINTA FLEET PARKING AREAJ 35,820 PROPOSED EXISTING GRAND TOTAL 119,874 SF 121,968 SF AREA: � SITE AREA: ' 2.75 ACRES 2.80 ACRES cc& Qu1/I N W GEM of the DESERT •• City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 18 of 67 www.gparchitects.org DRAFT AREQUIREMENTS �:1►7�� SUMMARY PER SPACE TYPE Department Total Area per Space Type Officel Office2 Office-P Warehouse Shop/ Storage Covered Canopy Exterior Parking Exterior Spaces Public Works Facilities Parks/Landscape Streets Traffic Common Areas Fleet Parking Site 609 0 0 0 0 0 1,350 0 794 828 862 623 0 0 880 750 0 3,150 0 0 0 480 300 0 3,600 0 0 0 0 880 1,200 0 4,050 0 0 800 600 0 2,700 0 888 1,563 1,630 0 781 368 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PF 35,820 0 0 0 0 0 0 5,207 49,163 TOTAL REQUIRED AREA PER SPACE TYPE: 4,603 1,563 1,630 3,040 368 0 55,877 49,163 GRAND TOTAL AREA: 119,874 SF 2.75 Acres LEGEND OFF1 = OFFICE (Typical Office Space) OFF2 = OFFICE (Office Type II) OFF-P = OFFICE (Plumbing) CC = COVERED CANOPY EX = EXTERIOR SPACE PO = PRIVATE OFFICE SP = SEMI -PRIVATE OFFICE WS = WORK STATION SH = SHOP ST = STORAGE WH = WAREHOUSE CIRC = CIRCULATION FACTOR SF = SQUARE FEET DEPT = DEPARTMENT W 0"&a GEM ofth1 DESERT — — City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 19 of 67 11001 kol A DMFT EXISTING EMPLOYEE COUNT Job Title N H o .X W C Qc W Comments FUNCTIONAL GROUP PARKS/LANDSCAPE Foreman Parks Worker Maintenance II Maintenance 1 1 1 1 2 Total Personnel for Dept: 5 Job Title N 0) H o X Q- W W Comments STREETS Streets Analyst Foreman Maintenance II Maintenance 1 1 1 2 2 Total Personnel for Dept: 6 Total Existing Personnel: 1 11 cc& Qui1/I V� W GEM of the DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 20 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT 1001 kol A 9 EXISTING BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE Buildings/Spaces Comments U a Existing Admin Building Streets Analyst Office Foreman Office Foreman Office Shift Lead Office Training Room Lunch Room Restroom Lobby/Waiting Area Conference Room Circulation Total SF for Existing Buildings: 144 120 120 120 255 160 100 400 205 536 2,160 * 5 people in office * 3 people in office * 2-3 people in office * Seats 6-8 people ca Building/Spaces m 5) Comments U° x bee SiTe Tian Tor iocaTion Existing Shop & Storage * Higher Grade Sign/Equipment Shop 960 Storage 100 Traffic Control Storage 1000 Circulation 300 o a or Existing Shop & Storage Buildings: 1 2,360 SF c E Buildings/Spaces m Comments U * See Site Plan for location Existing EMT Building 5610 * Higher Grade Total SF for Existing Buildings: 5,610 SF Total SF for Existing Buildings: 10,130 SF Cv 0"&(V GEM ofth1DOE1SERT — — City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 21 of 67 EXISTING SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE �E Site m rn Comments U d Cell Tower Paint Storage Tool Storage Material Bin Storage Drying Bed Storage Laydown Area Site Circulation 500 * must remain in place * needs canopy 112 320 546 1800 1840 3500 10000 Total SF for Site: 18,618 DRAFT Net Area: Parking U a m U 0. Ha � �y u`o m U Comments Vehicle Extra Small Equipment Small Vehicle Regular Vehicle Medium Vehicle Large Vehicle CC 100 2.25 CC 200 2.25 CC 300 2.25 CC 420 2.25 CC 540 2.25 0 66 0 10 2 *including employee & fleet vehicle parking 10' x 10' 10' x 20' 12' x 25' 12' x 35' 12' x 45' 0 29,700 0 9,450 2,430 Total SF for EXISTING PARKING: 41,580 78 TOTAL EXISTING SF: 1 70,328 SF eca QUL(ra GEM ofth,DESERT — — City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 22 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT 1001 kol A 9 Job Title a y v N ID U V VV a 7 3 U Li p O a. O U V PUBLIC WORKS Deputy Director 1 0 OFF] PO 250 1.2EManagement Assistant 1 0 OFF1 PO20 ID 1.2E Total Personnel for Dept: r27 0 Total Office SF for Dept: *See attached office standards for more information 0 0 N vLLi O Support Space m 0 0 a ° 2 U Ui ° ° O u O 0. V Copier / Fax Area 0 1 OFF] 25 1.3E File & Storage 0 1 OFF1 75 1.5C Conference Rooms 0 0 OFF] 0 1.2E Total Support Space SF for Dept: m CL C O N Exterior Parking m 0 a ° 3 0 V a U U Li 10, V Employees 2 0 EX 200 2.25 Visitors 1 0 EX 200 2.25 Total Exterior Parking TOTAL AREA REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC WORKS: Net Area: C N 7 U � 3 � Ui 313 0 150 0 4631 0 463 Net Area: c m U � U- 0 34 0 113 0 0 0 146 146 Net Area: c m y U 3 ri 900 0 450 0 1,350 0 1,350 1,813 1 1,959 PUBLIC WORKS Comments kAudio-Visual Needs 5F Comments kCentralized w/ all Functional Groups k See Common Areas 5F Comments 1 visitor per 10 employees 5F eca 0"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 104 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 23 of 67 11001 kol A DRAFT FACILITIES Job Title FACILITIES Facilities/Equipment Analyst M & O Technician Maintenance II Maintenance I Total Personnel for Total Office SF for Dept: Q c C o H Q N y w w Q 2 1 0 OFF1 PO C 144 1 ,2E 1 0 OFF] WS E 64 1.3E 1 0 OFF1 WS G 25 1,3E 2 1 OFF] WS G 25 1.3E *See attached office standards for more information N N N c CL a Z�, H Support Space m m v a 7 v V V V U Copier / Fax Area 0 1 OFF1 50 1 ,3E File & Library 0 1 OFF1 100 1.5C Supply Storage 0 1 OFF1 80 1,3E Misc. Crew Room Space 0 1 OFF1 50 1.3E Shop Area General Shop 1 0 SH 500 1.5C Warehouse/Storage Paint Storage 0 1 WH 150 1.6C Tool Storage 0 1 WH 150 1 ,6C Surplus Storage 1 0 WH 250 1,6C Multi -Purpose Room 0 0 OFF1 0 1,2E Conference Rooms 0 0 OFF] 0 1.2E Locker Room 0 0 OFF-P 0 1,2E Shower Room 0 0 OFF-P 0 1.2E Total Support Space SF for Dept: cc& Qu1/I N W GEM of the DESERT Net Area: C N 7 U N 7 � U. 180 0 86 0 34 0 68 34 368 34 401 I: 1 Comments "Audio -Visual Needs lose proximity to crew :�rew Room Setup �rew Room Setup :�rew Room Setup 5F Comments *Centralized w/ all Functional Groups *Centralized w/ all Functional Groups * See Common Areas * See Common Areas * See Common Areas * See Common Areas 5F City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 24 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT 1001 kol A 9 d a c O H Exterior Parking m m p 7 V a V Q V U ui Q. cn (� Employees 5 1 EX 200 2.25 Visitors 1 0 EX 200 2.25 Total Exterior Parking TOTAL AREA REQUIRED FOR FACILITIES: Net Area: U u- 2250 450 450 0 2, 700 450 3,150 FACILITIES Comments * See Fleet Parking 1 visitor per 10 employees 5F 4,2181 1,357 5,574 sF eca 0"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 106 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment ReportY www.gparchitects.org Page 25 of 67 11001 kol A DRAFT PARKS/LANDSCAPE Job Title N N N C H H y N o PARKS/LANDSCAPE Parks/Landscape Analyst 1 0 OFF1 PO C 144 1.2E Foreman 1 0 OFF1 WS E 64 1.3E Parks Worker 1 0 OFF] WS G 25 1,3E Maintenance11 1 0 OFF1 WS G 25 1,3E Maintenance 1 2 1 OFF1 WS G 25 1.3E Total Personnel for Dept: 6 1 Total Office SF for Dept: *See attached office standards for more information Q y Support Space m a) v Copier / Fax Area 0 1 OFF1 50 1.3E File & Library 0 1 OFF1 100 1.5C Supply Storage 0 1 OFF1 80 1.3E Misc. Crew Room Space 0 1 OFF] 50 1,3E Shop Area General Shop 0 1 SH 200 1,5C Warehouse Paint Storage 0 1 WH 150 1,6C Tool Storage 0 1 WH 150 1,6C Laydown Area 0 0 EX 0 1,2E Multi -Purpose Room 0 0 OFF1 0 1,2E Conference Rooms 0 0 OFF] 0 1,2E Locker Room 0 0 OFF-P 0 1.2E Shower Room 0 0 OFF-P 0 1.2E Total Support Space SF for Dept: cc& Qui{/I {R (% GEM of the DESERT Net Area: c m V � LL 180 0 86 0 34 0 34 0 68 34 401 34 435 Comments "Audio -Visual Needs Dose proximity to crew :�rew Room Setup :�rew Room Setup :�rew Room Setup :�rew Room Setup 5F Comments "Centralized w/ all Functional Groups "Centralized w/ all Functional Groups " See Site Areas " See Common Areas " See Common Areas " See Common Areas " See Common Areas iF City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 26 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT 1001 kol A 9 o CL H c o Exterior Parking m m v ° 7 7 V 0 V O- V V ui OL W U Employees 6 1 EX 200 2.25 Visitors 1 0 EX 200 2.25 Total Exterior Parking TOTAL AREA REQUIRED FOR PARKS/LANDSCAPE: Net Area: c m m 7 U 3 ri 2, 700 450 450 0 3,150 450 3,600 PARKS/LANDSCAPE Comments * See Fleet Parking 1 visitor per 10 employees SF 3,5511F 1,657 5,208 ISF www.gparchitects.org W 0"&(V GEM ofthe DESERT — — 108 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 27 of 67 Job Title N .2 raT. H y STREETS Streets Analyst 1 0 OFF1 PO C 144 1.2E Foreman 1 0 OFF] WS E 64 1,3E Maintenance II 2 0 OFF1 WS G 25 1.3E Maintenance 1 2 2 OFF1 WS G 25 1.3E Total Personnel for Dept: 6 2 Total Office SF for Dept: *See attached office standards for more information a a > N h N c o Support Space m m m a a V V V V V 7 U > LL Q H � 0 � 0V Copier / Fax Area 1 0 OFF1 50 1.3E File & Library 1 0 OFFI 100 1.5C Supply Storage 1 0 OFFI 80 1.3E Misc. Crew Room Space 0 1 OFFI 50 1.3E Shop Area General Shop 1 0 SH 400 1.5C Signage Shop 1 0 SH 400 1.5C Warehouse Paint Storage 1 0 WH 150 1.6C Tool Storage 1 0 WH 150 1.6C Storage 1 0 WH 250 1.6C Laydown Area 0 0 EX 0 1.2E Multi -Purpose Room 0 0 OFF] 0 1.2E Conference Rooms 0 0 OFFI 0 1.2E Locker Room 0 0 OFF-P 0 1.2E Shower Room 0 0 OFF-P 0 1.2E Total Support Space SF for Dept eca Qal�&(v GEM ofth,DESERT — — Net Area: c N U m ri 180 0 86 0 68 0 681 68 401 68 469 ®'' DRAFT Comments 'Audio -Visual Needs lose proximity to crew :�rew Room Setup :�rew Room Setup :�rew Room Setup 3F Comments 'Centralized w/ all Functional Groups 'Centralized w/ all Functional Groups ' See Site Areas ' See Common Areas ' See Common Areas ' See Common Areas ' See Common Areas iF City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report F Page 28 of 67 www.gparchtects.org LSD DRAFT 1001 kol A 9 STREETS Exterior Parking Employees Visitors Total Exterior Parking m � O N N N V V a a 2 U u vai U 6 2 EX 200 2.2E 1 0 EX 200 2.2E Net Area: N u u- 2, 700 900 450 0 3,150 900 4,050 Comments k See Fleet Parking 1 visitor per 10 employees iF TOTAL AREA REQUIRED FOR STREETS: 1 5,9571 1,035 6,992 ISF eca ouh&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 110 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment ReportY www.gparchitects.org Page 29 of 67 11001 kol A DRAFT TRAFFIC Job Title TRAFFIC Traffic Analyst Traffic Signal Supervisor Signal Technican II Technician Total Personnel for Dept: a QL H y H 0 1 OFF] PO C 144 1,2E 0 1 OFF. WS E 0.4 1,3E 0 1 OFF1 WS F 40 1,2E 0 2 OFF. WS F 40 1,2E *See attached office standards for more information N d N C Q N y Support Space m m m N a 7CL w w U LL — O O r�- Copier / Fax Area 0 1 OFF. 50 1.3E File & Library 0 1 OFF] 25 1.5C Supply Storage 0 1 OFF] 25 1.3E Misc. Crew Room Space 0 1 OFF1 50 1.3E Shop Area Traffic/Electrical Shop 0 1 SH 400 1 .5C Warehouse Storage 1 0 WH 500 1.6C Multi -Purpose Room 0 0 OFF1 0 1,2E Conference Rooms 0 0 OFF] 0 1,2E Locker Room 0 0 OFF-P 0 1,2E Shower Room 0 0 OFF-P 0 1.2E Total Support Space SF for Dept: cc& Qu1/I N W GEM of the DESERT Net Area: C m 3 U � LL 0 180 0 86 0 50 0 100 0 416 416 :rr .1. Comments "Audio -Visual Needs lose proximity to crew �rew Room Setup :�rew Room Setup :�rew Room Setup 5F Comments *Centralized w/ all Functional Groups *Centralized w/ all Functional Groups *Climate Control Secure area * See Common Areas * See Common Areas * See Common Areas * See Common Areas 5F City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 30 of 67 www.gparchitects.org DRAFT 1001 kol A 9 N Q U. c O Exterior Parking m m v a 7 U V V V {L N F V Employees 0 5 EX 200 2.25 Visitors 0 1 EX 200 2.25 Total Exterior Parking TOTAL AREA REQUIRED FOR STREETS: Net Area: 3 u 1L 0 2,250 0 450 0 2,700 2 700 SF 800 3,923 4,723 SF TRAFFIC Comments W0"&(v GEM of[he DESERT — — 112 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 31 of 67 11001 kol A DRAFT COMMON AREAS Q o Area: m m y U U_ U U) a V Lobby Area 1 0 OFF2 100 1,5C Mail Room 0 1 OFF1 50 1.2E IT Server Room 0 1 OFF2 120 1,3E Copier/Supply Room 0 0 OFF1 0 1.5C Multi-Purpose/Lunch Room 1 0 OFF2 650 1,2E Multi-Purpose/Lunch Room- Storage 0 1 OFF1 100 1.3E a ADA Public Restroom 1 1 OFF-P 80 1.2E Men 0 3 OFF-P 80 1.2E Women 0 3 OFF-P 80 1.2E rrr■ Locker Room 0 36 OFF1 _ 10 1.3E Shower Room 0 4 OFF-P 80 1,2E Laundry (Washer/Dryer) 0 1 OFF1 120 1.2E Clean Uniform 0 1 OFF1 30 1,3E Soil Uniform 0 1 OFF1 10 1.3E Conference Rooms Conference Room - 4 people 0 0 OFF1 144 1.3E Conference Room - 8 people 0 0 OFF2 228 1,3E Conference Room - 12 people 1 0 OFF2 325 1.3E Conference Room - 16 people 0 0 OFF2 450 1.3E a Pantry 1 0 OFF-P 150 1.5C Vending Room 1 0 OFF-P 50 1.5C Outdoor Lunch Area/Patio 0 1 CC 200 1.5C Ice Machine 1 0 CC 50 1.3E Drinking Fountain 0 1 OFF-P 50 1.3E Janitor Closet 0 1 OFF-P 50 1.2E Fire Riser Room 0 1 SH 25 1.2E Electrical Room 0 1 SH 200 1.2E Mechanical Room 0 1 SH 200 1.2E Utility Room 0 1 SH 200 1.2E Total Common Area SF: eca Qac�a GEM ofth,DESERT — — 11 11 11 1 Comments See Functional Groups 24 SF per person x 28 people- Backup EOC 10 sf per person - 28 people plus 30%; M ✓V=6 Vl=3,W=1 12' x 12' 12' x 19' 13' x 25'- Audio -Visual Needs 15' x 30' iF 113 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 32 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT J 1001 kol A 9 0 3 7 LL Item a LL W V N H ci Vehicle Extra Small Vehicle 0 1 CC 100 2.2E Small Vehicle 66 -8 CC 200 2.2E Regular Vehicle 0 8 CC 300 2.2E Medium Vehicle 10 -8 CC 420 2.2E Large Vehicle 2 0 CC 540 2.2E Total SF for FLEET PARKING: 1 78 -7 Net Area: 0) C h w 7 7 LL Ob � 3 U 0 225 29,700 -3,600 0 5,400 9,450 -7,560 2,430 0 41,580 -5,760 35,820 *existing fleet vehicle parking spaces **based on the list & comments provided by Julie Mignogna on 9/30/19 & 10/17/19 10' x 10' 10'x20' 12' x 25' 12' x 35' 12' x 45' 5F FLEET VEHICLES Comments eca Qai#tra GEM of th1 14 DESERT — — www.gparchftects.org City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 33 of 67 11001 kol A DRAFT SITE Item c ~ Drying Bed 6 30'd x 30'w 4 0 CC 430 2.2E Material Bins Streets Concrete 1 0 CC 127 2.2E Green Waste Tree/Mulch 1 0 CC 127 2.2E Mulch 1 0 CC 127 2.2E Sand 1 0 CC 77 2.2E Surplus 1 0 CC 46 2.2E Lay -down Areas Parks/Landscape 0 1 EX 300 2.2E Streets 1 0 EX 300I 2.2E Traffic 1 0 EX 1500 2.2E Trash Enclosure Trash Bins 2 0 CC 30 2.2E Recycle Bins General Recycle Bins 1 0 CC 30 2.2E MISC Cell Tower 1 0 EX 400 1.2E Propane Tank 1 0 EX 50 1.2E Emergency Generator 0 1 EX 400 1.2E Landscape Area 1 0 EX 10,000 1.00 Mechanical Equipments 1 0 EX 3,000 1.2E Electrical Equipments 1 0 EX 1,500 1,2E Gates 2 1 EX 200 1.2E Pedestrian Walkway 1 0 EX 5,000 1.00 Site Circulation 1 0 EX 12,000 1.00 Allowance 1 0 EX 1 OjW 1.00 ca Qub&(V GEM ofth,DESERT — — - - • I� I 11� 11 111 11� 111� 111� III Comments 7'4"d x 13'8"w x 6'4"h ?'4"d x 13'8"w x 6'4"h 7'4"d x 13'8"w x 6'4"h ?W'd x 8'4"w x 6'4"h ?'4"d x 5'w x 6'4"h I O'd x 100'w 20'd x 100'w 20'd x 100'w iF City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 34 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT 1001 kol A 9 SPACE REQUIREMENTS- COMPARISON TO 2008 DESIGN CRITERIA, MAINTENANCE YARD MASTER PLAN FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA The 2008 Design Criteria, Maintenance Yard Master Plan, City of La Quinta, California was planned to accommodate the following operations: • Public Works Maintenance Services Divisions • Code Enforcement • Animal Control • Emergency Services • Community Services • Human Resources However, with reorganization of the City departments in October 2019, the Corporate Yard will now only accommodate the following operations: • Functional Groups- • Facilities • Parks/Landscape • Streets • Traffic Though fewer departments will be accommodated at the site, the 2008 Design Criteria only planned for 18 total employees. With the growth and projection of the City Operations in 2019, the Corporate Yard will now need to house 28 employees. An additional 10 planned employees will increase the size of the overall facility, The City operates in a way that the 2008 Design Criteria no longer supports. As multiple interviews and surveys have uncovered, the City would like separation of its Functional Groups within the Corporate Yard - separation of warehouse space, shop space and office space. The 2008 Design Criteria portrayed the operations as a continuous unit with very little division by functional group. It has been determined that this is not the ideal method of operation. For instance, foremen are no longer grouped together, rather the foreman are placed with their field workers, The office standard and model has therefore shifted to accommodate this change in operation. Each functional group has additional support space assigned to accommodate administrative and technical services; some of this program - copy/printer area and supply storage - will be consolidated. (See Space Requirement charts for a breakdown of the support spaces). Due to this operational change, the Maintenance Office/Crew square footage depicted in the 2008 Design Criteria is insufficient to accommodate the current and future needs of the City, Based on the City of La Quinta's current operation, the 2008 Design Criteria has some programmatic items that no longer serve the City's operations and therefore, are not accounted for in the 2019 Needs Assessment- • Wellness Center- (No longer desired, cost savings to remove from Needs Assessment) • Vehicle Maintenance Bay- (City contracts out, cost savings to continue operation as is) • Shop/Warehouse Space- (Now divided by functional group) • Fuel & Wash- (City contracts out vehicle washing, only one vehicle uses the CNG fueling station - Sweeper, no need to increase fuel positions or fuel island based on current/future operation) • Other Canopy Covered Areas- (Now included in lay -down areas and functional groups' storage/ warehouse space) • Vehicle/Equipment Parking- (Planned for 63 fleet vehicles vs. 71 fleet vehicles needed now) • Employee/Visitor Parking- (Planned for 49 employee/visitor vs, 32 employee/visitor parking needed now) • Bunkers- (Planned for too many material types- 1 1 bunkers vs. 5 bunkers) • Yard Storage/Lay-down Area- (too small) • Dumpsters/Staging Area- (too small) c� eca Qx4fra GEM ofthe DESERT — — 116 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report www.gparchitects.org Page 35 of 67 THREESPACE REQUIREMENTS F07TINT, • Container Storage- (to be moved to Functional Groups' Storage/Warehouse space) • Emergency Generator- (Portable, accommodated in fleet vehicle parking) • Hazmat Storage- (Removed from Needs Assessment, no longer part of operations) • Diesel Fuel Tank- (Removed from Needs Assessment, no longer part of operations) • Gasoline Tank- (Removed from Needs Assessment, no longer part of operations) SPACE STANDARDS (FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS) The space allocated per job title has changed based off of current/future operation. The following is a breakdown of the 2008 Design Criteria office styles and common areas square footage as well as the 2019 Needs Assessment office styles and common areas square footage. The 2008 Design Criteria provided 4 office styles- (See below by PB Americas, Inc.) • Module A- 64 sf (Foreman) • Module B- 120 sf (Clerk/Reception) • Module C- 168 sf (Not Used) • Module D- 224 sf (Manager) There is no office style space allocated for the field workers. The 2008 Design Criteria will provide the following additional spaces - Conference Rooms • 8 person- 216 sf • Crew/Lunch Room/Training- 750 sf • Accommodate up to 35 occupants • Vending/Kitchenette- 224 sf • Laundry Room- 75 sf Module A (64 square feet) W.O. '7 O� Modular Partition workstation A Oca Qac�a GEM ofth,DESERT — — City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 36 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT 1001 kPI A 9 Module B (120 square feet) Module D (224 square feet) c� 12'-0" 1 A'A" ta O"&(V GEM ofth1 1E8SERT — — City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report www.gparchftects.org Page 37 of 67 11001 kol A DRAFT The 2019 Needs Assessment will provide 6 office types. Space was determined based off of operation and job title. (See Section 4 Space Standards) • Office Style A- 250 sf (Director) • Office Style B (Not Used) • Office Style C- 144 sf (Facilities/Equipment Analyst Parks/Landscape Analyst, Streets Analyst, Traffic Analyst) • Office Style D- 120 sf (Executive Assistant) • Office Style E- 64 sf (M&O Technician, Parks/Landscape Foreman, Streets Foreman, Traffic Signal Supervisor) • Office Style F- 40 sf (Signal Technician 11, Technician) • Office Style G- 25 sf (Facilities- Maintenance II & I, Parks/Landscape- Parks Worker & Maintenance II & I, Streets- Maintenance II & 1) The 2019 Needs Assessment will provide the following additional spaces. (See Section 4 Space Standards) • Conference Rooms • 8 person- 228 sf • 12 person- 325 sf • Multi-Purpose/Lunch Room- 496 sf • Accommodate up to 42 occupants • Pantry- 150 sf • Vending Room- 50 sf • Ice Machine- 50 sf • Clean Uniform- 30 sf • Soiled Uniform- 10 sf C(JQuiKra GEM ofth,DESERT — — City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 38 of 67 www.gparchffects.org � ' 'kpr SPACE REQUIREMENTS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK acevQ�«r�, GEM ofthe DESERT — — 120 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 39 of 67 11001 kol A .......................................................... PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK............................................................... cc& QulV &(v GEM of the DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 40 of 67 www.gparchitects.org DRAFT SPACE STANDARDS Space standards are in the form of plan diagrams found in the following section. This offers a visual guide of the current space needs respective of each Functional Group at the facilities in the form of plan layouts. This section expands on the description of the deficiencies on the current facilities from Section Two to provide individual "room" solutions in the form of office standard space plans to address and provide a visual reference to the needs of individual staff and common area space layouts. Standard space standard plans were developed to respond directly to the current and future needs of the facilities. In conjunction with industry standards for office layouts, these standardized layouts provided are based on interviews, discussions, observations, and workshops with staff and personnel. Each workstation and space layout is based specifically on what is needed to optimize work flow and interconnectivify for the organization. Using the information gathered we attempted to standardize the specific areas based on the future needs of the department and future growth. These plans are subject to change based on the on -going development of the design and additional changes requested by the city. Depicted in this section, are typical office layouts representing the size and type of space needed for the staff to perform daily work activities. The standard spaces take into consideration necessary furniture and equipment needed by the staff and to project the required space needed. TYPICAL SPACE STANDARDS: • Office (private and workstation) • Conference Rooms • Multi-Purpose/Training/Lunch Room eca 0"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 122 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 41 of 67 0"l L SPACE STANDARDS DRAFT LEGEND/EXAMPLE scale- 1/8" = 1'-0 KEYNOTES 01 OVERHEAD BINDER BINS 02 UNDER COUNTER PEDESTAL FILE 03 COUNTERTOP WORKSPACE 04 CHAIR 05 DESK 06 VISITOR'S CHAIR 1 07 VISITOR'S CHAIR 2 08 COFFEE TABLE 09 MARKER BOARD 10 SMALL SIDE TABLE 11 COUCH 12 LATERAL FILE 13 DESK W/ EXTENDED MEETING SURFACE 14 BOOKCASE 15 SIDE TABLE 16 VERTICAL SHELVES W/ DOORS 17 ROLLED PLAN STORAGE 18 WHITE BOARD cc& Qul &(v GEM of the DESERT 123 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 42 of 67 www.gparchitects.org DRAFT :110111 N A. 250 SF (PRIVATE OFFICE) PUBLIC WORKS DEPUTY DIRECTOR C. 144 SF (PRIVATE OFFICE) FACILITIES/EQUIPMENT ANALYST PARKS/LANDSCAPE ANALYST STREETS ANALYST TRAFFIC ANALYST (AUDIO-VISUAL) O N O r N rl 17r-6rr 12r—Orr 12r-Orr zi i I P3 J Xj X. I O N OFFICE STYLE- A/C scale- 1 /8" = 1 '-0 1zr_0n l.-j 1,14 Jr ! W "&(v GEM of th1 DESERT — — City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 43 of 67 0 OFFICE STYLE- D-F scale- 1/8" = 1'-0 D. 120 SF (PRIVATE OFFICE) MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT E. 64 SF (WORK STATION) M&O TECHNICIAN PARKS/LANDSCAPE FOREMAN STREETS FOREMAN TRAFFIC SIGNAL SUPERVISOR F. 40 SF (WORK STATION) SIGNAL TECHNICIAN II TECHNICIAN W Qul�&(v GEM of the DESERT 0 N rl 10r—Orr z I r L2 I L2 I Lz . •I I P3 L- D-1 120 SF 8r-Orr L2 L2 o i o I 0 I 00 I P3 E-1 64 SF E-2 DRAFT 10r—Orr Ir z I Lz I L2 I P3 L_ D-2 120 SF 8r-Orr 64 SF City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 44 of 67 www.gparchffects.org `.1 L41-- DRAFT G. 25 SF (WORK STATION) FACILITIES- MAINTENANCE II & I PARKS/LANDSCAPE- PARKS WORKER PARKS/LANDSCAPE- MAINTENANCE II &I STREETS MAINTENANCE II & I H. 325 SF CONFERENCE ROOM- 12 PEOPLE (AUDIO-VISUAL NEEDS) 5r—Orr r ----- 1 o � � In P3 O Ln N G-1 25 SF 131—Orr 12 OCC 325 SF OFFICE STYLE- G/H scale- 1/8" = 1'-0 Cv 0"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 126 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment ReportY www.gparchitects.org Page 45 of 67 I ;[*I I I Ll DRAFT MULTI -PURPOSE ROOM- I scale- 1 /16" = 1'-0 I. 760 SF MULTI -PURPOSE/ LUNCH ROOM (AUDIO-VISUAL NEEDS) W Qali &(v GEM ofth,DESERT — — 23'-0" r--------------- I I I I I I I I I 24 OCC I I I I 23'-0" r--------------� I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 24 OCC 23'-0" 23'-0" r-------------- n I I r--------------� I I I �I Ic Ic 0 c 0 c 0 I Ic Ic 0 c c c 0 I c I 0 M o M P Ic 0 C C C 0 I C I Ic 0 c 0 I Ic 0 c 0 I I L______________J I I 1 L______________J I I 36 OCC 48 OCC 23'-0" r--------------� I I 10000 00001 I I I 0000I 10000 00001 I I 0000 0000 L--------------J 56 OCC City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 46 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT SPACE STANDARDS7*1U O7 SPACE ADJACENCIES DIAGRAM ----------------------- 1 I 1 I 1 I I 1 FLEET VEHICLE I ' PARKING ' I I 1 I I I I 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • 1 I PUBLIC WORKS 1 1 ' 1 I • 1 ' ' � EMPLOYEESNISITOR OFFICE AREA � I 1 I • PARKING 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 • 1 I 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 - -•------- - - - - -- TRAFFIC ' TRAFFIC ' • ' ' I OFFICE AREA I ' WAREHOUSE/SHOP SUPPORT AREAS ' I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 • - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' ' 1 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I COMMON AREAS ----------------- ` ------------------ • ' � - - - - - - - - - - - - - -♦ RESTROOMS, - ' 1 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ • 1 - - - • 1 CONFERENCE ROOMS ' SHOWERS, I I 1 FACILITIES ' &SUPPORT SPACES ' 1 ' OFFICE AREA - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -♦ ' 1 1 LOCKERS & 1 ' 1 • 1 ' ' SUPPORT AREAS 1 1 ' FACILITIES ' ' WAREHOUSE/SHOP SUPPORT AREAS ' ' d A ADA 1 � I I 1 1 11 RR I '1 I ' !- `! -- -- -- -- -----� - 1� LOBBY y MULTI-PURPOSE/LUNCH ♦1 1 1 1 1 ' • / 1 11 & SUPPORT SPACES 1 I 1 ------ - - - - -- STREETS 1 STREETS ♦I OFFICE AREA WAREHOUSE/SHOP SUPPORT AREAS 1 ------------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I 1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 I I - - - - - - - - - -IARKS/LANDSCAPE -- - - - - - I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 1 PATIO 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I I _ 1 - - - - - - - - I OFFICE AREA I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 1 BUILDING SUPPORT AREAS PARKS/LANDSCAPE - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 , ♦1 WAREHOUSE/SHOP SUPPORT AREAS i 1 1 1 1 ' I 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 1 Cv 0"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — - 128 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 47 of 67 ;[*I I I Ll DRAFT SPACE ADJACENCIES DIAGRAMS '$ ■ - ■ ■ - ■ - ■ ■ - ■ - ■ - ■ ■ - ■ - ■ ■ - ■ - ■ ■ 1. : PUBLIC WORKS : ■ -------------------------- EXECUTIVE = ASSISTANT OFFICE SUPPORT - AREAS - (JQuLI&(v GEM of the DESERT a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ff 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 41* = FACILITIES ;FIELDWORKERS;; ANALYST r•, r r FOREMAN rr r �r �r r , FIELD WORKERS;; : ■ r - — — — — — — — — — — - - — - — - ; r : WH/SHOP r OFFICE SUPPORT AREAS r; ■ , r r, r r, -------------- -.= --- -- : WAREHOUSE/SHOP SUPPORT AREAS : PARKS/LANDSCAPE ::FIELD WORKERS; r•, r ANALYST FOREMAN: . FIELD WORKERS; : r I Ir • r OFFICE SUPPORT AREAS WAREHOUSE/SHOP SUPPORT AREAS 129 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 48 of 67 www.gparchitects.org DRAFT $ S ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . STREETS •----------- ;WFIELD WWORKERS:; r•, r ANALYST FOREMAN: • .........• , FIELD; WORKERS;; r r OFFICE SUPPORT AREAS • � r r� r r WAREHOUSE/SHOP SUPPORT AREAS 0 4 0 E ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 0 0 ... E ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ 0 0 0 ... E ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . .. .....................................� TRAFFIC " TECHNICIANS OFFICE SUPPORT ; ANALYST 000...E r • ;1 AREAS ■ ,r r FOREMAN ; c� SPACE ADJACENCIES DIAGRAMS tCV Qal�tt(V GEM ofthe DESERT — — 130 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report www.gparchitects.org Page 49 of 67 7�1U�� DRAFT SPACE ADJACENCIES DIAGRAM ----------------------------------------- MEN'S RESTROOM D.F. LOCKERS ADA RR S911EQ WOMEN'S RESTROOM i.0 SHOWER U ---------------------------------------------- - ------------------------ ,--- --------------- CONFERENCE RM (8) COPY/ IT SERVER UTILITY ' MAIL [LOBBY ONFERENCE RM (12) ELECTRICAL MECHANICAL i i r i """"""""""""""""""""""""" COMMON AREAS ICE VENDIN PANTRY PATIO ———---——---——---——---——----— (V QWkkV GEM of the DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 50 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT ............................................................... PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK............................................................... W 0"&(V GEM ofthe p4SERT — — www.gparchftects.org City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 51 of 67 ......................................................... PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK............................................................... cc& QulV &(v GEM of the DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 52 of 67 www.gparchitects.org OTHER CONSIDERATIONS FIVE OTHER CONSIDERATIONS During the assessment and programming of the existing site for the City of La Quinta Corporate Yard, Gillis and Panichapan Architects investigated the feasibility of adding additional pickle ball courts within the 10-acre site shared by the Maintenance Facility. The community expressed a desire for eight pickle ball courts. Any additional park amenities would require additional parking; therefore, Gillis and Panichapan Architects, Inc. also looked into the feasibility of adding additional parking. Through investigation, Gillis and Panichapan Architects determined the ideal location of the proposed pickle balls court. The criteria for selection included the following; • Proximity to existing courts • Proximity to existing seating areas • Usable park space • Feasibility of increased parking The proposed location of the additional pickle ball courts is located near the existing pickle ball courts and adjacent to the seating area in the park. Pickle ball is a social sport; proximity to the other courts was crucial in our selection as well as the proximity to any existing seating areas. The proposed location, also leaves a large swath of land intact. This allows the park greater flexibility in program. Due to the increase in pickle ball courts, the existing under -served parking was adjusted to include 14 new parking stalls. The placement of the parking allows the existing canopy shading the dog park entry to remain undisturbed and utilized space that was underused prior to this configuration. Please see the following page for the proposed pickle ball and parking layout. * The City plans to engage an in-depth analysis of the current park and its amenities. �I W (2"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 134 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 53 of 67 a VA DRAFT PROPOSED PICKLE BALL COURT LOCATION N scale- n.t.s. T Q PROPOSED PICKLE BALL COURTS LOCATION Q PROPOSED PARKING- 14 NEW STALLS W Qali &(v GEM ofth,DESERT — — City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 54 of 67 www.gparchffects.org 01 ■ DRAFT ............................................................... PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK............................................................... W 0"&(V GEM ofthe PI SERT — — www.gparchftects.org City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 55 of 67 99, SUMMARY The following block diagram conveys space adjacency depicting the possible spatial configuration of each individual functional group. These diagrams are based on the combination of office standard diagrams and the space needs validation assessment data charts depicted in the previous sections. Although similar to reading a floor plan, these are not meant to be viewed as such. Unlike floor plans space adjacency diagrams offer no information and/or limitations regarding egress requirements, site, structure, or infrastructure that would be typically addressed in a floor plan. The individual required spaces are depicted to scale to show their relative size and their preferred adjacencies and are subject to change once the conditions just mentioned are factored in further design development. The main goal of the block diagram is to provide a scaled guide to depict the necessary and preferred adjacencies between required spaces. On top of providing an organization structure, they provide a visual guide on the quantity, size and scope of each individual functional group. This serves mainly as a placeholder for each functional group to enable them to quantify their individual overall spatial footprints. LEGEND: COMMON AREAS PUBLIC WORKS FACILITIES PARKS/LANDSCAPE STREETS TRAFFIC PAINT STORAGE LOCATION- SHOWN ON SITE PLAN GENERAL NOTES: TOTAL BUILDING AREA: 12500 SF FUNCTIONAL GROUP AREA BREAKDOWN' - TRAFFIC CONTROL AREA: 1399 SF FACILITIES AREA: 1464 SF PARKS/LANDSCAPE AREA: 1064 SF STREETS AREA: 1704 SF OFFICE AREA AND WAREHOUSE/SHOP INCLUDED eca Qal�&(V GEM ofth,DESERT — — City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 56 of 67 www.gparchitects.org t DRAFT LU F rczo � m3a z O 0 W Q w OJ o0 a a3a LU O U) N F- LL�a .9, l l um Jl wo jK I I I I I I �31 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �p�y�2p �I{�-�Iih 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +++++_ q +++++++++� - g---i -0 I I w 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I(!/WF{'W� 1 1 I I 1 U1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � .o U 0 �Q Qd'oN p�N J�M -0-8 �. 0' 8' 16' 32' CCa Qt6&a GEM of the DESERT — — SCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0" 138 re7 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report www.gparchitects.org Page 57 of 67 DRAFT SUMMARY The following site block diagrams depict a proposed optimal layout of each functional group facility in the context of the existing site conveying both the administrative and operations side of the facility. This provides a potential site layout based on the space needs identified from the block diagrams. Organizing this information into the site diagram provides the City with an organizational spine for a future design scheme and master plan to future improvements of the City of La Quinta Corporate Yard. KEY ADVANTAGES TO CONSIDER: • A CLEAN SLATE FOR OPTIMAL PLANNING, A campus can be planned optimally for growth, flexibility, and evolution decades into the future aligned with predictions, aspirations, and goals of the City This new facility would be updated to all current energy and building codes. • PHASING AND EFFICIENCY OF WORK FLOW. Start the construction at a separate part of the site to provide some level of business continuity. Move everyone into the new facility while the rest of the program is developed, MULTIPLE ACCESS POINTS. Efficiency of site circulation requires multiple points of entry and exit. Creating a new access road to the East would allow opportunity for an efficient system of circulation for Operations. ISSUES THAT REMAIN: • SITE INFRASTRUCTURE: Further evaluation is needed regarding how site infrastructure would be impacted in terms of access and costs. Existing electrical, water, sanitary, vehicular and equipment access will play a role in the costs and feasibility of reconfiguring the site. COVERED CANOPY FOR FLEET VEHICLES: The City needs to determine if all fleet vehicle should be covered or not. Due to the climate, UV protection is desirable. However, the cost of infrastructure and the need for the pedestrian access bridge must be analyzed prior to decision making, If the City determines that the pedestrian access bridge is required, the covered canopies for the fleet vehicles conflict and could not be used. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO PARK: GPa has determined the best placement for the pedestrian accessway along the north side of the Corporate Yard. This location minimizes impact on the existing infrastructure and fleet vehicle parking requirements. However, though impact is minimal it is important to note that the Corporate Yard loses a portion of its laydown area, —500sf, The City must decide if losing the laydown area square footage outweighs the possible benefit of adding a pedestrian accessway from the existing employee/visitor parking area. Also, the pedestrian accessway reduces the number of 12'x25' parking stalls from 9 to 8. The City will need to determine if the loss of this parking spot is acceptable. • ENTITLEMENT AND COMMUNITY IMPACT, Consideration of time and cost for getting a campus of this size reviewed and approved through the entitlement process. ccQm�&aThe reconfigured site should minimize impacts & to the community and the environment. GEM of the DESERT KEY NOTES: 01 EMPLOYEE/VISITOR PARKING NEEDS: 32 EXISTING PROVIDED: 37 02 PROPOSED DISTRICT VEHICLE PARKING: 71 ACTUAL PROVIDED: 72 03 PROPOSED VISITOR/HANDICAP PARKING: 21 04 PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD 05 PROPOSED LAYDOWN AREA- TRAFFIC 1500 SF FUTURE- 2040 S TOTAL- 3540 S 06 PROPOSED LAYDOWN AREA- FACILITIES 300 SF FUTURE- 350 SF TOTAL- 650 SF 07 PROPOSED LAYDOWN AREA- PARKS/L 300 SF FUTURE- 350 SF TOTAL- 650 SF 08 PROPOSED ADDITIONAL PAINT STORAGE 09 PROPOSED CANOPY FOR MATERIAL BINS 10 EXISTING CELL TOWER TO REMAIN 11 PROPOSED NO PARKING SPACE- EMERGENCY ACCESS BACK-UP AREA LEGEND: I --1 PROPOSED ADDITIONAL FLEET VEHICLE PARKING 10'X20' 4 L__] 12'X25' 9 TOTAL 13 (4,800 SF) ® PARKING COUNT PROPOSED LAYDOWN AREA 2100 SF FURTURE LAYDOWN AREA- 2740 SF PROPOSED COVERED CANOPY 2555 SF C-_] CANOPY FOR FLEET VEHICLES 4380 SF PROPOSED RE -STRIPED FLEET VEHICLE PARKING: 10'X20' 14 (3,400 SF) ❑ PROPOSED NO PARKING SPACE City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 58 of 67 www.gparchitects.org City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 58 of 67 www.gparchitects.org 10'-0" 0 r CV tM- SITE DIAGRAMS tj��l��l SITE DI RAM-- OPTION 1 I 9 ; I _ _ � _ _ _ _ J r I r � I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � I 26-0" ! 8 I --- I13 I I ----------------------- I I I I 6 I I I I I I 10 I I i I I I PROPOSED BUILDING 26'- a 12,500SF _ J - // / 77---Aum� Q — 4 7 FRANCIS HACK LANE a 04 LO _ --- M 03 11 I o I ---------- ------ ---- __ 14 N 10'-0" l 0' 16' 32' .�E Cu Cv SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" GEM °f`h, DESERT — - City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 59 of 67 SITE IAGRAW OPTION12 I 44—�— t I --�-44 9 I I I I I � I --- I 9 17 05 ,— -- o 01 ----I I I I 06 i r r 25'-0° 117— I � Q I 07 0 I I I I I 32 J 9 UMI� 4 c --0 N L------------- ------ -- O---------------------J I II I ---' 09 I I I IT,, 1 ----------------I 10 PROPOSED BUI LDING IIIIII'I 26'- 12,500SF /— J /— -- / / / / 4----- ❑ 1 I 4 FRANCIS HACK LANE 0 M 03 12 � I I o ' 10'-0" l 0' 16' 32' ° GEM ojtheDESERT — - SCALE: 1/32" = 1'-0" 141 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 60 of 67 www.gparchitects.org DRAFT SITE DIAGRAMS I I I I I I I I I I I I I LEGEND: PROPOSED ADDITIONAL FLEET VEHICLE PARKING 10'X20' 3 12'X25' 9 TOTAL 12 (4,800 SF) ® PARKING COUNT PROPOSED LAYDOWN AREA 2100SF L- 1 r 'I FURTURE LAYDOWN AREA- 2455 SF PROPOSED COVERED CANOPY 2555SF PROPOSED RE -STRIPED FLEET VEHICLE PARKING: KXX 10'X20' 14 (3,400 SF) PROPOSED NO PARKING SPACE I— --- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I KEY NOTES: 01 EMPLOYEE/VISITOR PARKING NEEDS: 32 EXISTING PROVIDED: 37 02 PROPOSED DISTRICT VEHICLE PARKING: 71 ACTUAL PROVIDED: 71 03 PROPOSED VISITOR/HANDICAP PARKING: 21 04 PROPOSED ACCESS ROAD 05 PROPOSED LAYDOWN AREA- TRAFFIC 1400SF FUTURE- 1670SF TOTAL- 3070SF 06 PROPOSED LAYDOWN AREA- FACILITIES 300SF FUTURE- 350SF TOTAL- 650SF 07 PROPOSED LAYDOWN AREA- PARKS/L 300SF FUTURE- 350SF TOTAL- 650SF 08 PROPOSED ADDITIONAL PAINT STORAGE 09 PROPOSED CANOPY FOR MATERIAL BINS 10 EXISTING CELL TOWER TO REMAIN 11 PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS 12 PROPOSED NO PARKING SPACE- EMERGENCY ACCESS BACK-UP AREA I� 0' 20' 60' Cv0"&a SCALE: 1" = 60'-0" GEM ofthe DESERT — — 142 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment ReportY www.gparchitects.org Page 61 of 67 E..DM,EI STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COSTS A Statement of Probable Cost (SoPC) has been prepared based on the City of La Quinta Corporate Yard program requirements, conceptual block diagram, and the reconfigured site. The information contained in this document represents the approximate costs for construction based solely on this needs assessment programming. It is intended that these estimates be refined as the design process continues, however, the estimate may be relied on for planning and 'order of magnitude" budgeting purposes. The estimated cost of constructing a new facility will need to be examined to develop a complete cost -benefit picture to support a more complete SoPC. GENERAL ITEMS • Programmatic SoPC is based on the needs assessment and programmatic space requirements and conceptual site analysis and plans developed by GPa. • Construction budgets are based on the City of La Quinta contracting for the completion of the complete facility and site work improvements in a continuous phase to a single General Contractor. • Construction budgets are based on State of California Prevailing Wages only and do not include Federal funding wages and requirements. • Budget excludes any costs associated with hazardous material remediation. • Budget excludes all design, construction, and commissioning fees associated with obtaining a LEED certification from the USGBC. Sustainable design practices and use of these materials are included in the budget. • Budget excludes all costs required for temporary facilities during construction such as lockers, parking, storage, and others. • Budget excludes all site work except the covered canopies for the material bins and fleet vehicles. • Owners course of construction builders risk insurance is included within the direct costs. FIXTURES, FURNISHINGS, AND EQUIPMENT ALLOWANCES • Typical furnishings (desks, tables, chair, cabinets, and office furniture) figured for the Administrative functions are excluded from this Statement of Probable Cost. • Personnel office equipment (computers, printers, servers, copiers, scanners, and telephone equipment) is excluded and requirements will be determined by the City of La Quinta at a future date. SOME OTHER ADDITIONAL COST FACTORS ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THIS SOPC AND SHOULD BE CONSIDERED; • Possible costs associated with move coordination, business continuity, etc. • Likely additional cost of phasing construction to keep the facility running during the renovation, • This estimate is based on the assumption of a competitive bid environment at both the general contractor and subcontractor level. C(J Qal r&a GEM ofth,DESERT — — 143 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 62 of 67 www.gparchitects.org OW STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST • This estimate assumes the use of prevailing wage labor rates. • The SoPC depicts current cost for this year. Escalation cost should be factor in at roughly 3% per year factored into every year beyond 2020. • Budget excludes all other related shop equipment such as tools, machinery, etc. ecao"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 144 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 63 of 67 DRAFT City of La Quinta La Quinta Corporate Yard Statement of Probable Cost Date: 02/07/2020 Summary Space Type I Quantity I Unit I Unit Cost I Total 01 Office 1 $1,284,080.00 02 Office 2 $398,250.00 03 Office Plumbing $785,400.00 04 Warehouse/Shop $1,204,850.00 05 Exterior Spaces $12,000.00 06 Covered Canopy $832,800.00 Subtotal $4,517,380 Total building square footage 12500 sf $361.39 per square foot GRAND TOTAL ESTIMATE (including options listed above) $4,517,380 *Please note that all site work except the covered canopies for the material bins and fleet vehicles are excluded from this Statement of Probable Cost. cc& Qui &(V GEM ofthe DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 64 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT City of La Quinta La Quinta Corporate Yard Statement of Probable Cost Date: 02/07/2020 Detail Space Type I Quantity I Unit I Unit Cost I Total 01 OFFICE 1 (Typ. Office Space) Deputy Director 250 sf $350.00 $87,500.00 Executive Assistant 120 sf $350.00 $42,000.00 Traffic Analyst 144 sf $350.00 $50,400.00 Traffic Crew Room 340 sf $350.00 $119,000.00 Facilities Analyst 144 sf $350.00 $50,400.00 Facilities Crew Room 360 sf $350.00 $126,000.00 Copier/Supply Room 455 sf $350.00 $159,250.00 Multi -Purpose Storage Room 195 sf $320.00 $62,400.00 Parks/Landscape Analyst 144 sf $350.00 $50,400.00 Parks/Landscape Crew Room 360 sf $350.00 $126,000.00 Conference Room 325 sf $400.00 $130,000.00 Streets Analyst 144 sf $350.00 $50,400.00 Streets Crew Room 360 sf $350.00 $126,000.00 Electrical Room 200 sf $320.00 $64,000.00 Mechanical Room 200 sf $320.00 $64,000.00 Utility Room 200 sf $320.00 $64,000.00 Janitor's Closet 50 sf $420.00 $21,000.00 Clean/Soiled Room 130 sf $300.00 $39,000.00 Office Circulation 1,874 sf $320.00 $599,680.00 Sub -total $1,284,080.00 02 OFFICE 2 (Office Type 2) Lobby Area 105 sf $350.00 $36,750.00 I.T. Server Room 115 sf $500.00 $57,500.00 Multi -Purpose Room 760 sf $400.00 $304,000.00 Sub -total $398,250.00 03 OFFICE-P (Plumbing) Public Toilet Room 80 sf $420.00 $33,600.00 Restroom/Locker/Shower Area 1,340 sf $420.00 $562,800.00 Laundry Room 130 sf $420.00 $54,600.00 Vending/Ice Area 120 sf $350.00 $42,000.00 Pantry 220 sf $420.00 $92,400.00 Sub -total $ 785,400.00 W 0"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 146 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gporchitects.org Page 65 of 67 DRAFT City of La Quinta La Quinta Corporate Yard Detail Statement of Probable Cost Date: 02/07/2020 Space Type Quantity I Unit Unit Cost Total 04 WAREHOUSE/SHOP Traffic Warehouse/Shop 915 sf $310.00 $283,650.00 Facilities Warehouse/Shop 960 sf $310.00 $297,600.00 Parks/Landscape Warehouse/Shop 560 sf $310.00 $173,600.00 Streets Warehouse/Shop 1,200 sf $310.00 $372,000.00 Paint Storage (150 sf X 2) 300 sf $260.00 $78,000.00 Sub -total $1,204,850.00 05 EXTERIOR SPACES Outdoor Lunch Area 200 sf $60.00 $12,000.00 Sub -total $12,000.00 06 COVERED CANOPY Material Bins 2,555 sf $120.00 $306,600.00 Parking- Fleet Vehicles 4,385 sf $120.00 $526,200.00 Sub -total $832,800.00 Cv Qm�&(v GEM ofthe DESERT City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Page 66 of 67 www.gparchffects.org DRAFT kh RECOMMENDATIONS NINE SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS: This report, prompted by the potential reconfiguration of the current City of La Quinta Corporate Yard, offers an initial step into strategic long term planning. This facilities assessment report quantifies the programmatic needs of the City for improvements in three primary steps, Firstly, it highlighted the needs based on the deficiencies in the existing facilities, provided a data chart organizing the quantity of required spaces along with the preferred individual "space standard" layouts, Secondly, these layouts were combined and formally organized into departmental blocks. The final step culminated these blocks into an ideal diagrammatic site scheme conveying an ideal campus layout. The site plan diagram offers a primarily functional and organizational approach, and will need to be overlaid with considerations of projected costs and requirements of the City's schedule, move coordination, along with the impact on the potential community and environment surrounding the existing site. With this report describing the needed parameters of the new facility, the following are our recommended the next steps for the progress of the potential reconfiguration of the City of La Quinta Corporate Yard: STEP 1: MASTER SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN A new master plan be would developed (refined from the site diagram in this report) to depict how the facility would be able to maximize the potential site based on the previous block diagrams completed. Topographic conditions, boundaries, views, context, setbacks, height restrictions, and easements etc, would be reviewed to determine the best positioning and areas allocated for various Functional Groups, parking, and circulation needed as it applies specifically to conditions of the site(s), Along with the site plan, the floor plans would depict space plan for typical office layouts, sizing, and groupings within the conceptual floor plan. Suggested furniture space layout for common space per functional group will be provided on the conceptual plans. STEP 2: UPDATED STATEMENT OF PROBABLE COST BASED ON MASTER SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLAN • An updated SoPC will be developed to reflect more specific Site Conditions and proposed floor plan. This will assist in formulating an established budget to finance and plan for the continued development of the project. Once these steps are completed we believe that the City can confidently move forward and initiate the formal entitlement process for the design and construction of the City of La Quinta Corporate Yard. eca 0"&a GEM ofthe DESERT — — 148 City of La Quinta- Corporate Yard Needs Assessment Report Y www.gparchitects.org Page 67 of 67 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 8 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITL- : APPROVE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH RAINY DAY ROOFING FOR ON -CALL ROOFING SERVICES RECOMMENDATION Approve agreement for contract services with Rainy Day Roofing for on -call roofing services; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Roofing services are needed to perform maintenance and minor repair services on an on -call, as -needed basis. • Rainy Day Roofing is qualified to provide on -call roofing services and was the only proposal received through the competitive Request for Proposals (RFP) process completed in June 2024. • The proposed agreement is for an amount not to exceed $100,000 per fiscal year (FY) for an initial three-year term, with an optional two-year extended term. FISCAL IMPACT Funds will be budgeted each FY in the City Building Repair account 501-0000-71103 through the term of the agreement. bACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In May 2024, staff issued an RFP, and one proposal was received by Rainy Day Roofing. The proposed agreement with Rainy Day Roofing (Attachment 1), is for an initial three- year term, beginning August 7, 2024, through June 30, 2027, at a not to exceed compensation amount of $100,000 per FY, with an option to extend for one additional two-year term. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect not to approve or modify the agreement. 149 Prepared by: Carley Escarrega, Administrative Technician Alfred Berumen, M&O Superintendent Approved by: Bryan McKinney, P.E., Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Agreement for Contract Services with Rainy Day Roofing 150 ATTACHMENT 1 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES THIS AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA, ("City"), a California municipal corporation, and Rainy Day Roofing, with a place of business at 8930 Center Ave. Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 ("Contracting Party"). The parties hereto agree as follows: 1. SERVICES OF CONTRACTING PARTY. 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall provide those services related to on -call roofing services, as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Services"). Contracting Party represents and warrants that Contracting Party is a provider of first-class work and/or services and Contracting Party is experienced in performing the Services contemplated herein and, in light of such status and experience, Contracting Party covenants that it shall follow industry standards in performing the Services required hereunder, and that all materials, if any, will be of good quality, fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase "industry standards" shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar services under similar circumstances. 1.2 Compliance with Law. All Services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations, and laws of the City and any Federal, State, or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.3 Wage and Hour Compliance, Contracting Party shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local wage and hour laws. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified herein, Contracting Party shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement, including a City of La Quinta business license. Contracting Party and its employees, agents, and subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Contracting Party shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, free and harmless against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties, or interest levied, assessed, or imposed against City hereunder. Contracting Party shall be responsible for all subcontractors' compliance with this Section. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Contracting Party warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the Services to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site where the Services are to be performed, if any, 151 and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. Should Contracting Party discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the Services or as represented by City, Contracting Party shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contracting Party's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). 1.6 Standard of Care. Contracting Party acknowledges and understands that the Services contracted for under this Agreement require specialized skills and abilities and that, consistent with this understanding, Contracting Party's work will be held to an industry standard of quality and workmanship. Consistent with Section 1.5 hereinabove, Contracting Party represents to City that it holds the necessary skills and abilities to satisfy the industry standard of quality as set forth in this Agreement. Contracting Party shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of this Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the Services performed by Contracting Party, and the equipment, materials, papers, and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Services by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence. The performance of Services by Contracting Party shall not relieve Contracting Party from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work at no further cost to City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Contracting Party. 1.7 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services ("Additional Services") only when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, provided that Contracting Party shall not be required to perform any Additional Services without compensation. Contracting Party shall not perform any Additional Services until receiving prior written authorization (in the form of a written change order if Contracting Party is a contractor performing the Services) from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of Contracting Party. It is expressly understood by Contracting Party that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to the Services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. It is specifically understood and agreed that oral requests and/or approvals of Additional Services shall be barred and are unenforceable. Failure of Contracting Party to secure the Contract Officer's, or assigned designee's written authorization for Additional Services shall constitute a waiver of any and all right to adjustment of the Contract Sum or time to perform this Agreement, whether by way of compensation, restitution, quantum meruit, or the like, for Additional Services provided without the appropriate authorization from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Compensation for properly authorized Additional Services shall be made in accordance with Section 2.3 of this Agreement. 152 -2- 1.8 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in "Exhibit D" (the "Special Requirements"), which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special Requirements shall govern. 2. COMPENSATION 2.1 Contract Sum. For the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with "Exhibit B" (the "Schedule of Compensation") in a total amount not to exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) per year for the life of the Agreement, encompassing the Initial and any Extended Terms (the "Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.7. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the Services, payment for time and materials based upon Contracting Party's rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other reasonable methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Contracting Party at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City; Contracting Party shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Regardless of the method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation, Contracting Party's overall compensation shall not exceed the Contract Sum, except as provided in Section 1.7 of this Agreement. 2.2 Method of Billing & Payment. Any month in which Contracting Party wishes to receive payment, Contracting Party shall submit to City no later than the tenth (10th) working day of such month, in the form approved by City's Finance Director, an invoice for Services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Such invoice shall (1) describe in detail the Services provided, including time and materials, and (2) specify each staff member who has provided Services and the number of hours assigned to each such staff member. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a principal member of Contracting Party specifying that the payment requested is for Services performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon approval in writing by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, and subject to retention pursuant to Section 8.3, City will pay Contracting Party for all items stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than thirty (30) days after invoices are received by the City's Finance Department. 2.3 Compensation for Additional Services. Additional Services approved in advance by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, pursuant to Section 1.7 of this Agreement shall be paid for in an amount agreed to in writing by both City and Contracting Party in advance of the Additional Services being rendered by Contracting Party. Any compensation for Additional Services amounting to five percent (5%) or less of the 153 -3- Contract Sum may be approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Any greater amount of compensation for Additional Services must be approved by the La Quinta City Council, the City Manager, or Department Director, depending upon City laws, regulations, rules and procedures concerning public contracting. Under no circumstances shall Contracting Party receive compensation for any Additional Services unless prior written approval for the Additional Services is obtained from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, pursuant to Section 1.7 of this Agreement. 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE. 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. If the Services not completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance, as set forth in Section 3.2 and "Exhibit C", it is understood that the City will suffer damage. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in "Exhibit C" (the "Schedule of Performance"). Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Contracting Party, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if Contracting Party shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the forced delay when and if in the Contract Officer's judgment such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer's determination, or assigned designee, shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. Extensions to time period in the Schedule of Performance which are determined by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, to be justified pursuant to this Section shall not entitle the Contracting Party to additional compensation in excess of the Contract Sum. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions in Article 8.0 of this Agreement, the term of this agreement shall commence on August 7, 2024, and terminate on June 30, 2027 ("Initial Term"). This Agreement may be extended for two additional year(s) upon mutual agreement by both parties ("Extended Term"), and executed in writing. 154 -4- 4. COORDINATION OF WORK. 4.1 Representative of Contracting Party. The following principals of Contracting Party ("Principals") are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Contracting Party authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the Services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: Richard Collins Rainy Day Roofing Telephone No.: (949) 394-1833 Email: richard@rainydayroofing.com It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing Principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contracting Party and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be changed by Contracting Party and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer. The "Contract Officer", otherwise known as Bryan McKinney, PE, Public Works Director/City Engineer or assigned designee may be designated in writing by the City Manager of the City. It shall be Contracting Party's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services, and Contracting Party shall refer any decisions, that must be made by City to the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall have authority to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of Contracting Party, its principals, and its employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Agreement, Contracting Party shall not contract or subcontract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated, or encumbered, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control of Contracting Party, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. Any attempted or purported assignment or contracting or subcontracting by Contracting Party without City's express written approval shall be null, void, and of no effect. No approved transfer shall release Contracting Party of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. 155 -5- 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode, or means by which Contracting Party, its agents, or its employees, perform the Services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision, or control of Contracting Party's employees, servants, representatives, or agents, or in fixing their number or hours of service. Contracting Party shall perform all Services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Contracting Party shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Contracting Party in its business or otherwise or a joint venture or a member of any joint enterprise with Contracting Party. Contracting Party shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City. Contracting Party shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. Except for the Contract Sum paid to Contracting Party as provided in this Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contracting Party for performing the Services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contracting Party for injury or sickness arising out of performing the Services hereunder. Notwithstanding any other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Contracting Party and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing services under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System (TERS") as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. Contracting Party agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Contracting Party shall fully comply with the workers' compensation laws regarding Contracting Party and Contracting Party's employees. Contracting Party further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Contracting Party to comply with applicable workers' compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any payment due to Contracting Party under this Agreement any amount due to City from Contracting Party as a result of Contracting Party's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. 4.5 Identity of Persons Performing Work. Contracting Party represents that it employs or will employ at its own expense all personnel required for the satisfactory performance of any and all of the Services set forth herein. Contracting Party represents that the Services required herein will be performed by Contracting Party or under its direct supervision, and that all personnel engaged in such work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized and permitted under applicable State and local law to perform such tasks and services. 4.6 City Cooperation. City shall provide Contracting Party with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records, or other data or information pertinent to the 156 -6- Services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to Contracting Party only from or through action by City. 5. INSURANCE. 5.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of any Services under this Agreement and throughout the duration of the term of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, policies of insurance as set forth in "Exhibit E" (the "Insurance Requirements") which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. 5.2 Proof of Insurance. Contracting Party shall provide Certificate of Insurance to Agency a endorsements performance. Ong with all required endorsements. Certificate of Insurance and must be approved by Agency's Risk Manager prior to commencement of 6. INDEMNIFICATION. 6.1 Indemnification shall indemnify, protect, defer and any and all of its officers, F" ("Indemnification") which is a part hereof. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party d (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless City employees, agents, and volunteers as set forth in "Exhibit incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made 7. RECORDS AND REPORTS. 7.1 Reports. Contracting Party shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, such reports concerning Contracting Party's performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall require. Contracting Party hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Contracting Party agrees that if Contracting Party becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein or, if Contracting Party is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Contracting Party shall promptly notify the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, of said fact, circumstance, technique, or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Contracting Party is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 7.2 Records. Contracting Party shall keep, and require any subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports (including but not limited to payroll reports), studies, or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and the Services performed hereunder (the "Books and Records"), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Books and Records shall be maintained in accordance with 157 -7- generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall have full and free access to such Books and Records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such Books and Records. Such Books and Records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Books and Records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Contracting Party's business, custody of the Books and Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Contracting Party's successor in interest. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds expended under this Agreement exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement. 7.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents, and other materials plans, drawings, estimates, test data, survey results, models, renderings, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings, digital renderings, or data stored digitally, magnetically, or in any other medium prepared or caused to be prepared by Contracting Party, its employees, subcontractors, and agents in the performance of this Agreement (the "Documents and Materials") shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, or upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, and Contracting Party shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Documents and Materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed Documents and Materials for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by Contracting Party will be at City's sole risk and without liability to Contracting Party, and Contracting Party's guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, revise, or assignment. Contracting Party may retain copies of such Documents and Materials for its own use. Contracting Party shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any Documents and Materials prepared by them, and in the event Contracting Party fails to secure such assignment, Contracting Party shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. 7.4 In the event City or any person, firm, or corporation authorized by City reuses said Documents and Materials without written verification or adaptation by Contracting Party for the specific purpose intended and causes to be made or makes any changes or alterations in said Documents and Materials, City hereby releases, discharges, and exonerates Contracting Party from liability resulting from said change. The provisions of this clause shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement and shall thereafter remain in full force and effect. 7.5 Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all 158 -8- copyrights, designs, rights of reproduction, and other intellectual property embodied in the Documents and Materials. Contracting Party shall require all subcontractors, if any, to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for the Documents and Materials the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contracting Party represents and warrants that Contracting Party has the legal right to license any and all of the Documents and Materials. Contracting Party makes no such representation and warranty in regard to the Documents and Materials which were prepared by design professionals other than Contracting Party or provided to Contracting Party by City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Materials at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7.6 Release of Documents. The Documents and Materials shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, or as required by law. Contracting Party shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of City, except as required by law or as authorized by City. 7.7 Confidential or Personal Identifying Information. Contracting Party covenants that all City data, data lists, trade secrets, documents with personal identifying information, documents that are not public records, draft documents, discussion notes, or other information, if any, developed or received by Contracting Party or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Contracting Party to any person or entity without prior written authorization by City or unless required by law. City shall grant authorization for disclosure if required by any lawful administrative or legal proceeding, court order, or similar directive with the force of law. All City data, data lists, trade secrets, documents with personal identifying information, documents that are not public records, draft documents, discussions, or other information shall be returned to City upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement. Contracting Party's covenant under this section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 8. ENFORCEMENT OF AGREEMENT. 8.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed, and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim, or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and Contracting Party covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 8.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefore. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service 159 -9- of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety, or general welfare, City may take such immediate action as City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this Section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to this Article 8.0. During the period of time that Contracting Party is in default, City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during any period of default. 8.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Contracting Party sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by City due to the default of Contracting Party in the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. 8.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non -defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. City's consent or approval of any act by Contracting Party requiring City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Contracting Party. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 8.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 8.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 8.7 Termination Prior To Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section for termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Contracting Party. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Contracting Party shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Contracting Party shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, thereafter in accordance with 160 -10- the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, except amounts held as a retention pursuant to this Agreement. 8.8 Termination for Default of Contracting Party. If termination is due to the failure of Contracting Party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, Contracting Party shall vacate any City -owned property which Contracting Party is permitted to occupy hereunder and City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 8.2, take over the Services and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Contracting Party shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Contracting Party for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed City. 8.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees; provided, however, that the attorneys' fees awarded pursuant to this Section shall not exceed the hourly rate paid by City for legal services multiplied by the reasonable number of hours spent by the prevailing party in the conduct of the litigation. Attorneys' fees shall include attorneys' fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorneys' fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery, and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose. 9. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES; NONDISCRIMINATION. 9.1 Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer, official, employee, agent, representative, or volunteer of City shall be personally liable to Contracting Party, or any successor in interest, in the event or any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Contracting Party or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 9.2 Conflict of Interest. Contracting Party covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of it, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder Contracting Party's performance of the Services under this Agreement. Contracting Party further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Contracting Party agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which effects his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Contracting Party warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 9.3 Covenant against Discrimination. Contracting Party covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of any impermissible classification including, but not limited to, race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Contracting Party shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry. 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 10.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. To City: To Contracting Party: CITY OF LA QUINTA Richard Collins Attention: Alfred Berumen Rainy Day Roofing 78495 Calle Tampico 8930 Center Ave. La Quinta, California 92253 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730 10.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. 10.3 Section Headings and Subheadings. The section headings and subheadings contained in this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the terms of this Agreement. 10.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 162 -12- 10.5 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement including the exhibits hereto is the entire, complete, and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements, and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. 10.6 Amendment. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Contracting Party and by the City Council of City. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. 10.7 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the articles, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining articles, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 10.8 Unfair Business Practices Claims. In entering into this Agreement, Contracting Party offers and agrees to assign to City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials related to this Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time City renders final payment to Contracting Party without further acknowledgment of the parties. 10.9 No Third -Party Beneficiaries. With the exception of the specific provisions set forth in this Agreement, there are no intended third -party beneficiaries under this Agreement and no such other third parties shall have any rights or obligations hereunder. 10.10 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of each of the parties hereto represent and warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] 163 -13- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. CITY OF LA QUINTA, CONTRACTING PARTY: a California Municipal Corporation By: Name: Jeff Fanning Title: Owner/President JON McMILLEN, City Manager City of La Quinta, California Dated: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California By:_ Name: Title: 164 -14- Exhibit A Scope of Services Roof replacement and roof repair services, including but not limited to roof maintenance, repair and roof replacement services on an on -call, as -needed basis. The services and tasks to be performed include the furnishing of all labor, materials, tools, equipment, supplies, tasks, and incidental and customary work necessary to competently perform roofing services and roof repair work at various City facilities, projects, and locations. Consultant shall provide all labor and additional materials to install new roofing systems including but not limited to: • Inspect and identify a variety of roof systems at a variety of facilities (TPO, tile, mineral surface, spray foam) • Replace, repair, and resurface of a variety of roof systems (TPO, tile, flat roof, spray foam, and mineral surface) • Replacement of missing roof elements • Remove roof tile systems, replace roof underlayment, and reinstall roof tiles • Inspect roof deck and replace plywood as needed • Replace all damaged or broken roof tiles with approved color and type • Inspect flat roof systems and replace with approved system where applicable • All drains that are to remain must be cleaned, inspected and water tested by roofing contractor before reroofing begins. • Inspect and replace any plastic, damaged or missing drain and overflow covers with new approved covers • Other typical and common miscellaneous roofing repairs and work • The work should include all preparation, replacement and repairs unless otherwise stated by the City • All replacement materials to be used will be approved by the Facilities Superintendent • All work shall be to applicable codes and to the satisfaction of the City Exhibit A 165 Page 1 of 4 Last revised summer 2017 ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT Re: Scope of Services If the Scope of Services include construction, alteration, demolition, installation, repair, or maintenance affecting real property or structures or improvements of any kind appurtenant to real property, the following apply: 1. Prevailing Wage Compliance. If Contracting Party is a contractor performing public works and maintenance projects, as described in this Section 1.3, Contracting Party shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local laws. Contracting Party is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Sections 16000, et seq., (collectively, the "Prevailing Wage Laws"), and La Quinta Municipal Code Section 3.12.040, which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "Public works" and "Maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "Public works" or "Maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if construction work over twenty- five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) and/or alterations, demolition, repair or maintenance work over fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) is entered into or extended on or after January 1, 2015 by this Agreement, Contracting Party agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws including, but not limited to, requirements related to the maintenance of payroll records and the employment of apprentices. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1725.5, no contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a "Public works" project unless registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR") at the time the contract is awarded. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "Public works" or "Maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Contracting Party will maintain and will require all subcontractors to maintain valid and current DIR Public Works contractor registration during the term of this Agreement. Contracting Party shall notify City in writing immediately, and in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours, after receiving any information that Contracting Party's or any of its subcontractor's DIR registration status has been suspended, revoked, expired, or otherwise changed. It is understood that it is the responsibility of Contracting Party to determine the correct salary scale. Contracting Party shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at Contracting Party's principal place of business and at the project site, if any. The statutory penalties for failure to pay prevailing wage or to comply with State wage and hour laws will be enforced. Contracting Party must forfeit to City TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($25.00) per day for each worker who works in excess of the minimum working hours when Contracting Party does not pay overtime. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1810 et seq., eight (8) hours is the legal working day. Contracting Party also shall comply with State law requirements to maintain payroll records and shall provide for certified records and inspection of records as required by California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq., including Section 1776. In addition to the other indemnities provided under this Agreement, Contracting Party shall defend (with counsel selected by City), indemnify, and hold City, Exhibit A 166 Page 2 of 4 its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with performance of the Services, including, without limitation, any and all "Public works" (as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws), Contracting Party shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law and/or the implementation of Labor Code Section 1781, as the same may be amended from time to time, and/or any other similar law. Contracting Party acknowledges and agrees that it shall be independently responsible for reviewing the applicable laws and regulations and effectuating compliance with such laws. Contracting Party shall require the same of all subcontractors. 2. Retention. Payments shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Article 2.0 of the Agreement. In accordance with said Sections, City shall pay Contracting Party a sum based upon ninety-five percent (95%) of the Contract Sum apportionment of the labor and materials incorporated into the Services under this Agreement during the month covered by said invoice. The remaining five percent (5%) thereof shall be retained as performance security to be paid to Contracting Party within sixty (60) days after final acceptance of the Services by the City Council of City, after Contracting Party has furnished City with a full release of all undisputed payments under this Agreement, if required by City. In the event there are any claims specifically excluded by Contracting Party from the operation of the release, City may retain proceeds (per Public Contract Code § 7107) of up to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the amount in dispute. City's failure to deduct or withhold shall not affect Contracting Party's obligations under the Agreement. 3. Utility Relocation. City is responsible for removal, relocation, or protection of existing main or trunk -line utilities to the extent such utilities were not identified in the invitation for bids or specifications. City shall reimburse Contracting Party for any costs incurred in locating, repairing damage not caused by Contracting Party, and removing or relocating such unidentified utility facilities. Contracting Party shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay arising from the removal or relocation of such unidentified utility facilities. 4. Trenches or Excavations. Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 7104, in the event the work included in this Agreement requires excavations more than four (4) feet in depth, the following shall apply: (a) Contracting Party shall promptly, and before the following conditions are disturbed, notify City, in writing, of any: (1) material that Contracting Party believes may be material that is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law; (2) subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site different from those indicated by information about the site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids; or (3) unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Agreement. Exhibit A 167 Page 3 of 4 (b) City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if it finds that the conditions do materially so differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in Contracting Party's cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work shall issue a change order per Section 1.8 of the Agreement. (c) in the event that a dispute arises between City and Contracting Party whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or increase in Contracting Party's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, Contracting Party shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date provided for by this Agreement, but shall proceed with all work to be performed under this Agreement. Contracting Party shall retain any and all rights provided either by contract or by law which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the contracting Parties. 5. Safety. Contracting Party shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out the Services, Contracting Party shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 6. Liquidated Damages. Since the determination of actual damages for any delay in performance of the Agreement would be extremely difficult or impractical to determine in the event of a breach of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be liable for and shall pay to City the sum of One Thousand dollars ($1,000.00) as liquidated damages for each working day of delay in the performance of any of the Services required hereunder, as specified in the Schedule of Performance. In addition, liquidated damages may be assessed for failure to comply with the emergency call out requirements, if any, described in the Scope of Services. City may withhold from any moneys payable on account of the Services performed by Contracting Party any accrued liquidated damages. Exhibit A 168 Page 4 of 4 Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of compensation for Additional Services, provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the maximum total compensation to be paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement is not to exceed One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($ 100,000.00) per year for the life of the agreement, encompassing the Initial and any Extended Terms ("Contract Sum"). The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party in installment payments made on a monthly basis and in an amount identified in Contracting Party's schedule of compensation attached hereto for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement. Initial Tarm- "Not to exceed" Year 1: $100,000.00 "Not to exceed" Year 2: $100,000.00 "Not to exceed" Year 3: $100,000.00 Possible Extended Term: "Not to exceed" Year 4: $100,000.00 "Not to exceed" Year 5: $100,000.00 ly�#•"i�l�1��11J�� Labor Roofing labor -all types as specified in RFP Superintendent Labor (when required) Equipment -prices include pickup and dellvery Per Day Per Week scissor lift 745 1050 generator 75 254 pressure washer 75 254 boom lift 1500 3000 restroom with wash 450 2000 crane marketcost market cast Incidental charges freight 150.00 per delivery disposal 500.00 per load $149,00 per labor hour (based on pr eval U ng wage) $149.00 per labor hour (based on prevailingwage) Complementary services include providing a roof report at no additional cost for all quotes. Exhibit B 169 Page 1 of 1 Exhibit C Schedule of Performance Contracting Party shall complete all services identified in the Scope of Services, Exhibit A of this Agreement, as requested by City within the time allowed by the total contract sum. Exhibit C 170 Page 1 of 1 None Exhibit D Special Requirements Exhibit D Page 1 of 1 171 Exhibit E Insurance Requirements E.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of this Agreement, the following policies shall be maintained and kept in full force and effect providing insurance with minimum limits as indicated below and issued by insurers with A.M. Best ratings of no less than A -VI: Commercial General Liability (at least as broad as ISO CG 0001) $1,000,000 (per occurrence) $2,000,000 (general aggregate) Must include the following endorsements: General Liability Additional Insured General Liability Primary and Non-contributory Commercial Auto Liability (at least as broad as ISO CA 0001) $1,000,000 (per accident) Auto Liability Additional Insured Personal Auto Declaration Page if applicable Workers' Compensation (per statutory requirements) Must include the following endorsements: Workers Compensation with Waiver of Subrogation Workers Compensation Declaration of Sole Proprietor if applicable Contracting Party shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, Commercial General Liability insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Contracting Party's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Contracting Party's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contracting Party's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. An endorsement evidencing the foregoing and naming the City and its officers and employees as additional insured (on the Commercial General Liability policy only) must be submitted concurrently with the execution of this Agreement and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. Contracting Party shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by Contracting Party, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by Contracting Party, any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Contracting Party's performance under this Agreement. If Contracting Party or Contracting Party's employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Contracting Party shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such Exhibit E 172 Page 1 of 5 person. The term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi -trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contracting Party's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. Contracting Party shall carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker's Compensation laws with employer's liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. If coverage is maintained on a claims -made basis, Contracting Party shall maintain such coverage for an additional period of three (3) years following termination of the contract. Contracting Party shall provide written notice to City within ten (10) working days if: (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; or (3) the deductible or self -insured retention is increased. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, Contracting Party shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with this Exhibit to the Contract Officer. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Contracting Party's obligation to indemnify City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents. E.2 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Contracting Party fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. b. Order Contracting Party to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contracting Party hereunder until Contracting Party demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate this Agreement. Exercise any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies City may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Contracting Party's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contracting Party may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contracting Party's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. Exhibit E 173 Page 2 of 5 E.3 General Conditions Pertaining to Provisions of Insurance Coverage by Contracting Party. Contracting Party and City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Contracting Party: 1. Contracting Party agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City, its officials, employees, and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010 with an edition prior to 1992. Contracting Party also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Contracting Party, or Contracting Party's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Contracting Party agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contracting Party and available or applicable to this Agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called "third party action over" claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Contracting Party shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City's protection without City's prior written consent. 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Contracting Party's general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Contracting Party or deducted from sums due Contracting Party, at City option. 8. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Contracting Party or any subcontractor, is intended Exhibit E 174 Page 3 of 5 to apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. 9. Contracting Party agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project that is brought onto or involved in the project by Contracting Party, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Contracting Party. Contracting Party agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Contracting Party agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. 10. Contracting Party agrees not to self -insure or to use any self -insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein (with the exception of professional liability coverage, if required) and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self -insure its obligations to City. If Contracting Party's existing coverage includes a deductible or self -insured retention, the deductible or self -insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the Contracting Party, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self -insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 11. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of this Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Contracting Party ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Contracting Party, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City. 12. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 13. Contracting Party acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Contracting Party of non-compliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 14. Contracting Party will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect. 15. Contracting Party shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Exhibit E 175 Page 4 of 5 Contracting Party's insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and an additional insured endorsement is required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five (5) days of the expiration of coverages. 16. The provisions of any workers' compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Contracting Party under this agreement. Contracting Party expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials, and agents. 17. Requirements of specific coverage features, or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all-inclusive. 18. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 19. The requirements in this Exhibit supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Exhibit. 20. Contracting Party agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Contracting Party for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. It is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. 21. Contracting Party agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Contracting Party arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City. Exhibit E 176 Page 5 of 5 Exhibit F Indemnification F.1 Indemnitv for the Benefit of Ci a. Indemnification for Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party's Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party. b. Indemnification for Other Than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses) incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contracting Party or by any individual or entity for which Contracting Party is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors of Contracting Party. C. Indemnity Provisions for Contracts Related to Construction (Limitation on Indemnity). Without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this agreement, Contracting Party shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City for liability attributable to the active negligence of City, provided such active negligence is determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where City is shown to have been actively negligent and where City's active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the obligation of Contracting Party will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of City. Exhibit F 177 Page 1 of 2 d. Indemnification Provision for Design Professionals. 1. Applicability of this Section F.1(d). Notwithstanding Section F.1(a) hereinabove, the following indemnification provision shall apply to a Contracting Party who constitutes a "design professional" as the term is defined in paragraph 3 below. 2. Scope of Indemnification. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party's Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, reimbursement of attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party. 3. Design Professional Defined. As used in this Section F.1(d), the term "design professional" shall be limited to licensed architects, registered professional engineers, licensed professional land surveyors and landscape architects, all as defined under current law, and as may be amended from time to time by Civil Code § 2782.8. F.2 Obligation to Secure Indemnification Provisions. Contracting Party agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth herein this Exhibit F, as applicable to the Contracting Party, from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contracting Party in the performance of this Agreement. In the event Contracting Party fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contracting Party agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this Exhibit. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth in this Agreement are binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contracting Party and shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Exhibit F 178 Page 2 of 2 City of La Qu i nta CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO.9 CITY COUNCIL MEETING' August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH BMO BANK, N.A. FOR BANKING AND MERCHANT SERVICES RECOMMENDATION Approve Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Contract Services with BMO Bank, N.A. for Banking and Merchant Services; and authorize the City Manager to execute the Agreement. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The City contracts with BMO Bank, N.A. (BMO) for banking and merchant services. • Amendment No. 1 (Amendment 1), included as Attachment 1, proposes to extend the term of the agreement for five additional years through fiscal year (FY) 2028/29. FISCAL IMPACT Based on current service levels, the monthly banking fees are estimated to be $1,074 and are anticipated to be covered by a deposit balance earning a credit rate of 1.75%. Prices are based on per -unit charges and are set for the five-year term of the contract (Exhibit B of Attachment 2). These prices have increased due to market pricing but have been offset by an increased earnings credit rate (ECR). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Following a request for proposals (RFP) in 2019, the City contracted with BMO (formerly Bank of the West) for banking and merchant services. The contract expired on June 4, 2024, and facilitates various financial transactions, including deposits, disbursements, merchant processing, and other essential banking services. BMO has demonstrated high performance in the following areas: • Service Reliability: Consistent and dependable banking operations without significant downtime. • Security: Robust security measures to protect City funds and sensitive financial information. • Cost Efficiency: Competitive pricing structure with minimal fees, resulting in cost savings for the City. • Customer Service: Responsive and helpful support staff address City inquiries and issues promptly. 179 BMO has consistently met or exceeded the service level agreements outlined in the contract. BMO has a robust online platform, and the City has added new services such as a Corporate Sweep Account, which has helped the City take advantage of short-term investment opportunities while maintaining sufficient liquidity for daily operations. Given the satisfactory performance of BMO, the cost-effective nature of the existing contract, and the benefits of continuity in service, staff recommends Council approve the proposed Amendment 1 extending the term for five years. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. Amendment No. 1 to Agreement for Contract Services 180 ATTACHMENT 1 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES WITH BMO BANK, N.A. (FORMERLY BANK OF THE WEST) This Amendment No. 1 ("Amendment No. 1") to Agreement for Contract Services ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of the 5t" day of June, 2024, ("Effective Date") by and between the CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City"), a California municipal corporation and BMO Bank, N.A. ("Consultant"). RECITALS WHEREAS, on or about June 4, 2019, the City and BMO Bank, N.A. (formerly Bank of the West) entered into an Agreement to provide services related to banking and merchant services. The term of the Agreement expires on June 4t", 2024 ("Initial Term"); and WHEREAS, City and Contracting Party have mutually agreed to amend Section 3.4 Term of the Agreement to extend the term for five additional years from June 5, 2024 through June 5, 2029; and WHEREAS, City and Contracting Party mutually agree to amend Section 2.1 - Contract Sum as detailed in Exhibit B of this Amendment No. 1. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant herein contained, the parties agree as follows: AMENDMENT In consideration of the foregoing Recitals and the covenants and promises hereinafter contained, and for good and valuable consideration, the sufficiency and receipt of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Section 2.1 Contract Sum — shall be amended as detailed in revised Exhibit B of this Amendment No. 1. 2. Section 3.4 Term shall be amended to read as follows: 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions in Article 8.0 of this Agreement, the term of this agreement shall commence on June 4, 2019, and terminate on June 4, 2024 ("Initial Term"). This Agreement is being extended effective June 5, 2024, and shall terminate on June 5, 2029 ("Extended Term"). In all other respects, the original Agreement shall remain in effect. 181 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Consultant have executed this Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement on the respective dates set forth below. CITY OF LA QUINTA CONSULTANT: BMO Bank, N.A. a California municipal corporation JON McMILLEN, City Manager City of La Quinta, California Dated: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California Tito Ibarrola, Director, Senior Government Relationship Manager Dated: 182 Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation With the exception of compensation for Additional Services provided for in Section 2.3 of this Agreement, the Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with the attached Exhibit B. 183 Account Name Model Name Model Billing Cycle Currency CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY OF LA QUINTA May, 2024 USD Collected Balance Disclosure Ledger -Float = Collected Positive Collected Negative Collected Investable Balance Disclosure Average Positive Collected Balance - Reserve requirement = Investable Balance Required Balance Disclosure Balance Required For Services = Total Required Balance Balance Position Disclosure Balance Position Basis - Total Required Balance = Balance Available for Other Service EXHIBIT B Schedule of Compensation Proposed Earnings Credit Amount 3,790.33 - Analyzed fees 1,073.56 Net Analyzed Result 2,716.77 Net analyzed credit of 2,716.77 will be waived. $1.00 of fees is equal to 674.65 of Investable Balance. Investable Balance receives a proposed earnings credit of 1.750000%. Account Number Model Analysis Date BMO Q XXXXXX1851 6/10/2024 2,613,966.50 56, 806.60 2,557,159.90 2,557,159.90 0.00 2,557,159.90 0.00 2,557,159.90 724, 277.25 724,277.25 2,557,159.90 724,277.25 1,832,882.65 184 Page 1 of 6 Account Name CITY OF LA QUINTA Account Number XXXXXX1851 Model Name CITY OF LA QUINTA Model Analysis Date 6/10/2024 Model Billing Cycle May, 2024 Currency USD Services Performed Proposed Proposed Proposed Volume Price Total Fee DEPOSITORY SERVICES GENERAL ACCOUNT SERVICES GENERAL SERVICES CORPORATE ACCOUNT MAINTENANCE 4 10.0000 40.00 ITEMS DEPOSITED 20 0.0500 1.00 OTHER CORPORATE CREDITS 1 0.3500 0.35 CORPORATE DEPOSIT 16 1.2000 19.20 ON US DEPOSIT ITEMS 0 0.0500 0.00 CHECKS DEPOSITED NOT ON US 0 0.0500 0.00 CHECK REJECTS 11 0.5500 6.05 Subtotal - GENERAL SERVICES CORPORATE MONEYACCOUNTS 66.60 ITEMS DEPOSITED-MMDA-CORP 0 0.0500 0.00 Subtotal - CORPORATE MONEY MARKET 0.00 ACCOUNTS DISBURSEMENT SERVICES REG CHECKING ACCT CHECK DEBIT 237 0.0700 16.59 NON -CHECK DEBITS 0 0.2000 0.00 DEPOSIT ADJUSTMENT DR 0 5.0000 0.00 Subtotal - DISBURSEMENT SERVICES BUSINESS NOW • 16.59 ITEMS DEPOSITED-CORP NOW 0 0.0500 0.00 Subtotal - BUSINESS NOW ACCOUNTS ANCILLARY SERVICES 0.00 ACH CREDIT 0 0.0800 0.00 ACH DEBIT 0 0.0800 0.00 Subtotal - ANCILLARY SERVICES MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 0.00 ACCOUNT ANALYSIS -PAPER STMT 1 0.0000 0.00 REG CHECKING -PAPER STMT 1 0.0000 0.00 E-ANALYSIS STMT # OF ACCESSES 4 0.0000 0.00 BALANCE ADMIN FEE 2,614,000 0.1000 261.40 Subtotal - MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 261.40 STOP PAYMENT SERVICES AUTOMATED STOPS ONLINE 60 MTH AUTO STOP PAYMENT 0 30.0000 0.00 Subtotal - AUTOMATED STOPS ONLINE 0.00 RETURN ITEMS COLLECTIONS PROCESSINGGENERAL RETURN ITEMS CHARGED BACK 1 10.0000 10.00 Subtotal - GENERAL PROCESSING 10.00 EXCEPTION• RETURN IMAGES RETRIEVED 2 2.5000 5.00 Subtotal - EXCEPTION PROCESSING 5.00 MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES CHECKS PAID NON -CUSTOMER 0 6.0000 0.00 185 Page 2 of 6 + 00 Account Name CITY OF LA QUINTA Account Number XXXXXX1851 Model Name CITY OF LA QUINTA Model Analysis Date 6/10/2024 Model Billing Cycle May, 2024 Currency USD Services Performed Proposed Proposed Proposed Volume Price Total Fee Subtotal - MISCELLANEOUS SERVICES 0.00 TREASURY MANAGEMENT SERVICES ACCOUNT RECONCILEMENT RECONCILEMENT PLANS FULL RECON MAINTENANCE 1 35.0000 35.00 FULL RECON PER ITEM 234 0.0000 0.00 AUTOMATED VOIDS/ ADDS 1 0.1500 0.15 Subtotal - RECONCILEMENT PLANS 35.15 POSITIVE PAY POSITIVE PAY E-MAIL ALERTS 2 0.0000 0.00 POSITIVE PAY MAINTENANCE 2 50.0000 100.00 CHK ISSUANCE FILE TRANSMISSION 5 0.0000 0.00 POSITIVE PAY PLAN 234 0.0600 14.04 MISMATCH POSITIVE PAY AUTO 1 2.5000 2.50 POSITIVE PAYEE MONTHLY MAINT 1 0.0000 0.00 POSITIVE PAY -PAYEE PER ITEM 234 0.0300 7.02 Subtotal - POSITIVE PAY . RECONCILEMENTFULL ACCOUNT VOID/CANCEL 0 0.0600 0.00 OUTPUT FILE TRANSMISSION 0 75.0000 0.00 INPUT ISSUE ELECTRONIC 0 0.0600 0.00 BASE FEE 0 35.0000 0.00 Subtotal - FULL ACCOUNT RECONCILEMENT PAYEE POSITIVE PAY - PAID ITEM 0 0.0300 0.00 PAYEE BASE FEE 0 55.0000 0.00 EXCEPTION ITEMS 0 0.7500 0.00 CHECK RETURN 0 3.0000 0.00 Subtotal - POSITIVE PAY DISBURSEMENT IMAGING INDEX RETRIEVALS 57 0.0000 0.00 DEPOSITED IMAGES -RETRIEVED 1 1.0000 1.00 CHECK VOLUME -INQUIRY ONLY 3 0.0550 0.17 INQUIRY IMAGES RETRIEVED 6 0.0550 0.33 u otal - DISWIMMUP"MAGING i ZERO BALANCE ACCOUNTS AUTOMATIC TRANSFER ACCT 1 8.0000 8.00 AUTOMATIC DEBIT 22 0.0000 0.00 AUTOMATIC CREDIT 22 0.0000 0.00 Subtotal - ZERO DANCE ACC&QUW REMOTE DEPOSIT CAPTURE REMOTE DEP-DEPOSIT 20 0.6500 13.00 REMOTE DEP-DEPOSIT 15 0.6500 9.75 REMOTE DEP-DEPOSIT 35 22.75 REMOTE DEP-CHECK ITEMS 100 0.0400 4.00 REMOTE DEP-CHECK ITEMS 110 0.0400 4.40 REMOTE DEP-CHECK ITEMS 210 8.40 PREMIER MAINTENANCE 1 45.0000 45.00 186 Page 3 of 6 + 00 Account Name CITY OF LA QUINTA Account Number XXXXXX1851 Model Name CITY OF LA QUINTA Model Analysis Date 6/10/2024 Model Billing Cycle May, 2024 Currency USD Services Performed Proposed Proposed Proposed Volume Price Total Fee PREMIER ADDITIONAL ACCT MAINTENANCE 2 8.0000 16.00 Subtotal - REMOTE DEPOSIT CAPTURE 92.15 COMMERCIAL VAULT SERVICES VAULT CHECK DEPOSIT 0 1.1000 0.00 Subtotal - COMMERCIAL VAULT SERVICES 0.00 CURRENCY/COINDEPOSITED CASH VAULT DEPOSITS - CV2 0 1.1000 0.00 CURRENCY DEP - STD (PER $100) - CV2 252 0.1500 37.80 Subtotal - CURRENCY/COIN DEPOSITED EL 37.80 COIN & CURRENCY SERVICE -BRANCH NON -STD STRAP ORDERED 4 0.0900 0.36 BASE ORDER FEE -BRANCH 1 4.0000 4.00 Subtotal - COIN & CURRENCY ... 4.36 SWEEP SERVICES MONEY MARKET INVESTMENT SWEEP 0 100.0000 0.00 Subtotal - SWEEP SERVICES 0.00' CORP SWEEP-INVESCO/ AIM FUNDS 1 135.0000 135.00 'ubto' POW 135.001 AUTOMATED CLEARING HOUSE SERVICES ELECTRONIC (ACH) CREDITS 0 0.0800 0.00 ELECTRONIC (ACH) DEBITS 0 0.0800 0.00 DEBIT FILTER RECURRING 0 0.7500 0.00 ACH POS PAY COMPANY MONTHLY MAINTEN 0 20.0000 0.00 ACH POS PAY - PER EXCEPTION REPORTE 0 1.2500 0.00 Subtotal -AUTOMATED CLEARING HOUSE =111 SERVICES GENERAL SERVICES ACH DEBIT RECEIVED 47 0.0800 3.76 ACH CREDIT RECEIVED 246 0.0800 19.68 EPA -EXCEPTION ITEMS 1 1.2500 1.25 ACH FRAUD CONTROL MAINTENANCE 3 25.0000 75.00 ACH ORIGINATION 14 0.0000 0.00 NOC CORRECTION 2 0.0000 0.00 PREFUNDING MAINTENANCE 4 0.0000 0.00 Subtotal - GENERAL SERVICES 99.69 ONLINE ACH ITEMS 9 0.0800 0.72 ONLINE ACH REPORTS 4 0.2600 1.04 ONLINE ACH MAINTENANCE 1 18.0000 18.00 ONLINE ACH MAINTENANCE 3 0.0000 0.00 ONLINE ACH MAINTENANCE 4 18.00 ONLINE ACH ITEMS 250 0.0800 20.00 Subtotal - ONLINE BANKING FOR BUSINESS 39.76 ORIGINATION ACH PPD CREDIT PRE -NOTES 1 0.0300 0.03 Subtotal - ORIGINATION- CONCENTRATION MODULE 0.03 187 Page 4 of 6 Account Name Model Name Model Billing Cycle Currency CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY OF LA QUINTA May, 2024 USD Account Number Model Analysis Date XXXXXX1851 6/10/2024 Services Performed Proposed Proposed Proposed Volume Price Total Fee CONCENTRATION CREDIT PRENOTES 1 0.0300 0.03 Subtotal - CONCENTRATION MODULE 0.03 ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE EDI COLLECTIONS EDI/EFT CREDITS RCVD - CCD+ 32 0.0800 2.56 EDI/EFT CREDITS RECEIVED - CTX 5 0.0800 0.40 Subtotal - EDI COLLECTIONS 2.96 DOMESTIC WIRE TRANSFER INCOMING FED WIRE TRANSFER CREDITS 1 0.0000 0.00 DOMESTIC WIRES CREDITS 1 8.0000 8.00 Subtotal - INCOMING FED 8.00 OUTGOING ONLINE DOMESTIC WIRE 1 8.0000 8.00 ONLINE DOMESTIC WIRE 3 8.0000 24.00 ONLINE DOMESTIC WIRE 4 32.00 WIRE TRANSFER DEBITS 4 0.0000 0.00 FED WIRE ABA REPAIR 1 40.0000 40.00 Subtotal - OUTGOING FED INTERNAL WIRE CREDIT ( ONLINE/ EDI) 0 8.0000 0.00 Subtotal - INTERNAL WIRE TRANSFERS INTERNATIONAL WIRE TRANSFER INTERNATIONAL• INTERNATIONAL WIRES CREDITS 0 8.0000 0.00 Subtotal - INTERNATIONAL WIRE -INCOMING I INTERNATIONAL PRODUCT SERVICES GENERAL SERVICES CANADIAN CHECKS - USD 1 3.0000 3.00 Subtotal - GENERAL SERVICES ONLINE BANKING FOR BUSINESS BALANCE REPORTING ONLINE USER FEE 9 0.0000 0.00 PREVIOUS DAY DR/CR ITEMS 760 0.0000 0.00 SAME DAY DR/CR ITEMS 683 0.0000 0.00 Subtotal - BALANCE REPORTING �LISINESS NKIhN BALANCE REPORTING MAINT 1 20.0000 20.00 ACCOUNTS REPORTED 4 12.5000 50.00 ONLINE ACCOUNTS -SAME DAY 1 70.0000 70.00 ONLINE ACCOUNTS -SAME DAY 3 45.0000 135.00 ONLINE ACCOUNTS -SAME DAY 4 0.00 ubtotal - BUSINESS BANKINC 50.00 BALANCE REPORTING ARCHIVE-2 YEAR 1 0.0000 0.00 BAL REPORTING PER TEMPLATE 9 0.0000 0.00 CSV DOWNLOADS 1 0.0000 0.00 188 Page 5 of 6 Account Name CITY OF LA QUINTA Account Number XXXXXX1851 Model Name CITY OF LA QUINTA Model Analysis Date 6/10/2024 Model Billing Cycle May, 2024 Currency USD Services Performed CSV DOWNLOADED TRANSACTIONS Subtotal - CORPORATE RECEIVABLES MGMT-ZERO BALANCING ZBA CONCENTRATION ACCOUNT FEE ZBA TIER ACCOUNT FEE Subtotal - RECEIVABLES MGMT-ZERO BALANCING TREASURYNOW PORTAL ACCESS FEE Subtotal - TREASURYNOW INFO REPORTING Proposed Volume 790 1 0 0 Proposed Price 0.0000 8.0000 8.0000 Bundle Def Proposed Total Fee 0.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 IMAGES VIEWED 0 0.0550 0.00 CURRDAY MONTHLY ACCT FEE 0 Bundle Def 0.00 ANALYSIS STATEMENT 0 0.3500 0.00 DEPOSIT STATEMENT 0 0.3500 0.00 ACH SPECIAL REPORTS 0 0.3500 0.00 ARP SPECIAL REPORTS 0 0.3500 0.00 Subtotal - INFO REPORTING 0.00 IMAGE EXPRESS SERVICES CD PRODUCED - PER CD 0 12.0000 0.00 IMAGES WRITTEN TO CD 0 0.0300 0.00 ONLINE MAINTENANCE 0 40.0000 0.00 Subtotal - IMAGE EXPRESS SERVICES 0.00 WIRE TRANSFER SERVICES INCOMING WIRE - AUTO 0 8.0000 0.00 INCOMING WIRE - MANUAL 0 8.0000 0.00 Subtotal - WIRE TRANSFER SERVICES 0.00 CHECK DEPOSITED NON ENCODED NON -ENCODED ON US 0 0.0500 0.00 NON -ENCODED / FOREIGN ITEMS 0 3.0000 0.00 NON -ENCODED LOCAL AND NON -LOCAL 0 0.0500 0.00 Subtotal - CHECK DEPOSITED NON ENCODED 0.00 Total Analyzed 1,073.56 Total Waived 232.02 Grand Total this Cycle 1,073.56 189 Page 6 of 6 190 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 10 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING. August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED MAY 31, 2024 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file revenue and expenditure report dated May 31, 2024. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The report summarizes the City's year-to-date (YTD) revenues and period expenditures for May 2024 (Attachment 1). • These reports are also reviewed by the Financial Advisory Commission. FISCAL IMPACT — None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Below is a summary of the column headers used on the Revenue and Expenditure Summary Reports: Original Total Budqet — represents revenue and expenditure budgets the Council adopted in June 2023 for fiscal year (FY) 2023/24. Current Total Budge t — represents original adopted budgets plus any Council approved budget amendments from throughout the year, including carryovers from the prior fiscal year. Period Activity— represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid in the reporting month. Fiscal Activity — represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid YTD. Variance Favorable/(Unfavorable) - represents the dollar difference between YTD collections/expenditures and the current budgeted amount. Percent Used — represents the percentage activity as compared to budget. 191 General Fund (GF) All Funds General Fund Payroll (GF) All Funds May 2024 Revenues MTD YTD $9,303,026 $62,613,569 $11,838,600 $117,842,793 Comparison to 2023 YTD Percent of YTD Percent of Budget YTD Budget 75.55% $66,401,667 84.54% 58.14% $120,185,044 63.40% May 2024 Expenditures YTD Percent of MTD YTD Budget $2,861,918 $48,646,548 47.75% $804,933 $10,417,546 77.80% $6,197,104 $108,377,666 46.26% Toa Five Revenue/Income Sources for Ma Comparison to 2023 YTD Percent of YTD Budget $50,293,266 44.21 % $21,108,127 87.95% $99,499,999 42.15% General Fund Non -General Fund Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax $ 2,921,575 Allocated Interest $ 645,314 Property Tax $ 2,666,184 Lighting and Landscape District Assessments $ 424,724 Measure G Sales Tax $ 1,451,498 SilverRock Green Fees $ 291,519 Sales Tax $ 1,142,907 County Sales Tax (Measure A) $ 176,036 Fire Service Credit $ 197,869 Developer Impact Fees- Transportation $ 173,538 i op rive twenanuresiuuvays Tor may General Fund Non -General Fund Sheriff Contract (March) $ 1,163,856 Capital Improvement Program - Construction(l) $ 1,705,449 Marketing and Tourism Promotions $ 115,802 Homelessness Assistance $ 250,000 Parks Landscape Maintenance Contract $ 65,010 SilverRock Maintenance $ 177,287 Plan Checks $ 59,252 Machinery & Equipment (IT Fund)(2) $ 148,262 Animal Shelter Contract Services $ 56,537 Lighting & Landscape Maintenance $ 137,472 (')CIP Construction: North La Quinta landscape conversion project; Fred Waring pavement; Dune Palms bridge (Z)Machinery & Equipment: Council chambers audio-visual/meeting services upgrades; city-wide new printers/copiers The revenue report includes revenues and transfers into funds from other funds (income items). Revenues are not received uniformly throughout the year, resulting in peaks and valleys. For example, large property tax payments are usually received in December and May. Similarly, Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund payments are typically received in January and June. Any timing imbalance of revenue receipts versus expenditures is funded from the City's cash flow reserve. The expenditure report includes expenditures and transfers out to other funds. Unlike revenues, expenditures are more likely to be consistent from month to month. However, large debt service payments or CIP expenditures can cause swings. Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Attachment: 1. Revenue and Expenditure Report for May 31, 2024 192 ATTACHMENT 1 ta ou ra i For Fiscal: 2023/24 Period Ending: 05/31/2024 c.ai.,i ax�l a Revenue Summary Variance Original Current Period Fiscal Favorable Percent Fund Total Budget Total Budget Activity Activity (Unfavorable) Used 101- GENERAL FUND 78,478,100 82,877,100 9,303,026 62,613,569-20,263,531 75.55% 105 - DISASTER RECOVERY FUND 15,000 15,000 0 -8,794-23,794 58.63% 201- GAS TAX FUND 2,458,600 3,247,900 161,526 2,827,377-420,523 87.05% 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 2,922,000 2,922,000 324 1,713,697-1,208,303 58.65% 203 - PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (MEASURE G) 2,500 2,500 0 -179 -2,679 7.17% 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 156,000 375,259 0 180,347-194,912 48.06% 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 101,500 161,500 41,667 185,732 24,232 115.00% 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 2,992,000 2,992,000 424,724 2,967,538-24,462 99.18% 220 - QUIMBY FUND 50,000 0 0 0 0 0.00% 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 70,000 70,000 110,296 158,772 88,772 226.82% 223 - MEASURE A FUND 2,028,000 2,028,000 176,036 1,457,322-570,678 71.86% 225 - INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 500 500 0 -17 -517 3.41% 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMAI10I506ANT (EMPGg2,500 24,550 24,550 12,050 196.40% 227 - STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAMS (SKM 5,000 0 4,312 -688 86.24% 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 20,500 20,500 1,276 14,391 -6,109 70.20% 231- SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 0 0 6 5,155,830 5,155,830 0.00% 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 55,000 80,000 0 25,043-54,957 31.30% 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN 0 0 0 -165 -165 0.00% 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 1,401,500 1,771,500 98,747 1,522,050-249,450 85.92% 243 - RDA LOW -MOD HOUSING FUND 30,000 30,000 0 -3,375-33,375 11.25% 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 20,000 20,000 2,958 57,876 37,876 289.38% 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FUND (Refinani@j0002016) 1,423,009 0 1,448,384 25,375 101.78% 250- TRANSPORTATION DIF FUND 1,520,000 620,000 173,538 436,213-183,787 70.36% 251- PARKS & REC DIF FUND 751,500 301,500 16,848 227,001-74,499 75.29% 252 - CIVIC CENTER DIF FUND 501,500 141,500 19,783 96,165-45,335 67.96% 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 100,000 40,000 3,176 26,996-13,004 67.49% 254 - COMMUNITY & CULTURAL CENTERS DIF252,500 102,500 7,648 64,140-38,360 62.58% 255 - STREET FACILITY DIF FUND 1,000 1,000 0 -71 -1,071 7.10% 256 - PARK FACILITY DIF FUND 100 100 0 -7 -107 6.69% 257 - FIRE PROTECTION DIF 151,500 41,500 5,828 28,615-12,885 68.95% 259 - MAINTENANCE FACILITIES DIF FUND 101,000 46,000 10,596 30,703-15,297 66.74% 270-ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 154,000 154,000 72,250 162,073 8,073 105.24% 275 - LQ PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER 2,500 2,500 0 1,953 -547 78.12% 299 - INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND 0 0 645,314 7,375,482 7,375,482 0.00% 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEBT SERVICE 1,100 1,100 0 0 -1,100 0.00% 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 17,950,700 90,688,672 50,000 17,006,037-73,682,635 18.75% 405 - SA PA 1 CAPITAL IMPRV FUND 1,500 1,500 0 -5 -1,505 0.36% 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 1,685,000 1,685,000 0 1,152,726-532,274 68.41% 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 2,256,708 2,256,708 4,165 2,317,960 61,252 102.71% 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 470,000 470,000 0 746,660 276,660 158.86% 504 - INSURANCE FUND 1,362,230 1,362,230 0 1,020,380-341,850 74.91% 601- SILVERROCK RESORT 5,277,950 6,493,950 346,473 6,249,070-244,880 96.23% 602 - SILVERROCK GOLF RESERVE 87,000 87,000 0 81,446 -5,554 93.62% 760 -SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN 6,000 6,000 0 4,931 -1,069 82.18% 761- CERBT OPEB TRUST 20,000 20,000 0 145,502 125,502 727.51% 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST 100,000 100,000 137,847 324,561 224,561 324.56% Report Total: 123,608,488 202,677,028 11,838,600 117,842,793-84,834,235 58.14% Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, published annually, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. 193 Page 1 of 3 For Fiscal: 2023/24 Period Ending: 05/31/2024 Expenditure Summary Variance Original Current Period Fiscal Favorable Percent Fund Total Budget Total Budget Activity Activity (Unfavorable) Used 101- GENERAL FUND 72,828,750 101,876,631 2,861,918 48,646,548 53,230,083 47.75% 201- GAS TAX FUND 2,802,400 5,561,461 54,047 2,402,559 3,158,903 43.20% 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 2,240,160 4,934,483 24,432 1,251,199 3,683,284 25.36% 203 - PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (MEASURE G) 0 41,687 0 11,625 30,063 27.89% 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 156,300 375,559 0 196,768 178,791 52.39% 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 100,000 100,000 8,442 74,935 25,065 74.94% 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 3,186,915 3,353,915 286,405 2,261,798 1,092,117 67.44% 220 - QUIMBY FUND 0 445,176 0 0 445,176 0.00% 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 150,000 150,000 6,614 132,748 17,252 88.50% 223 - MEASURE A FUND 1,865,000 4,810,319 0 2,673,169 2,137,150 55.57% 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMA11OFMOANT (EMPGg2,000 0 9,950 2,050 82.92% 227 - STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAMS (SKM 5,000 0 0 5,000 0.00% 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 5,500 5,500 0 0 5,500 0.00% 231- SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 0 0 0 16,696,117 -16,696,117 0.00% 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 54,000 39,000 3,355 43,728 -4,728 112.12% 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADM IN 0 0 2,030 7,880 -7,880 0.00% 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 1,596,340 2,326,340 93,389 1,594,596 731,744 68.55% 243 - RDA LOW -MOD HOUSING FUND 250,000 300,000 250,000 250,000 50,000 83.33% 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 31,500 31,500 164 22,291 9,209 70.77% 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FUND (Refina2Csi ^02016) 3,824,192 0 3,582,426 241,766 93.68% 250- TRANSPORTATION DIF FUND 550,000 1,669,775 0 409,936 1,259,839 24.55% 251- PARKS & REC DIF FUND 650,000 1,121,285 0 34,179 1,087,106 3.05% 252 - CIVIC CENTER DIF FUND 0 249,925 0 0 249,925 0.00% 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 15,000 15,000 0 1,191 13,809 7.94% 254 - COMMUNITY & CULTURAL CENTERS DIF 0 125,000 0 0 125,000 0.00% 259 - MAINTENANCE FACILITIES DIF FUND 180,000 180,000 0 0 180,000 0.00% 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 233,000 742,711 6,084 118,831 623,880 16.00% 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEBT SERVICE 1,100 1,100 0 0 1,100 0.00% 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 17,950,700 85,866,873 1,865,123 18,076,653 67,790,220 21.05% 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 1,448,750 2,331,044 64,690 437,130 1,893,913 18.75% 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 3,082,620 3,277,620 254,341 1,869,610 1,408,010 57.04% 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 2,242,200 3,092,200 1,000 696,032 2,396,168 22.51% 504 - INSURANCE FUND 1,118,000 1,118,000 784 1,108,540 9,460 99.15% 601- SILVERROCK RESORT 5,034,993 6,266,242 411,630 5,724,483 541,759 91.35% 760 -SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN 12,850 12,850 0 12,833 17 99.87% 761- CERBT OPEB TRUST 1,800 1,800 0 1,194 606 66.35% 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST 30,000 30,000 2,657 28,716 1,284 95.72% Report Total: 118,084,878 234,294,188 6,197,104 108,377,666 125,916,522 46.26% Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, published annually, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. 194 Page 2 of 3 Fund Descriptions Fund # Name Notes 101 General Fund The primary fund of the City used to account for all revenue and expenditures of the City; a broad range of municipal activities are provided through this fund. 105 Disaster Recovery Fund Accounts for use of one-time federal funding designed to deliver relief to American workers and aid in the economic recovery iin the wake of COVID-19. The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) was passed by Congress in 2021 to provide fiscal recovery funds to state and local governments. 201 Gas Tax Fund Gasoline sales tax allocations received from the State which are restricted to street -related expenditures. 202 Library and Museum Fund Revenues from property taxes and related expenditures for library and museum services. 203 Public Safety Fund General Fund Measure G sales tax revenue set aside for public safety expenditures. 210 Federal Assistance Fund Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) received from the federal government and the expenditures of those resources. 212 SLESF (COPS) Fund Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds (SLESF) received from the State for law enforcement activities. Also known as Citizen's Option for Public Safe (COPS). 215 Lighting & Landscaping Fund Special assessments levied on real property for city-wide lighting and landscape maintenance/improvements and the expenditures of those resources. 220 Quimby Fund Developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and improvements. 221 AB939 Fund/Cal Recycle Franchise fees collected from the city waste hauler that are used to reduce waste sent to landfills through recycling efforts, Assembly Bill (AB) 939, 223 Measure A Fund County sales tax allocations which are restricted to street -related expenditures. 224 TUMF Fund Developer -paid Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) utilized for traffic projects in Riverside County. 225 Infrastructure Fund Developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City's infrastructure as defined by Resolution 226 Emergency Mgmt. Performance Grant (EMPG) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. 227 State Homeland Security Programs (SHSP) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. 230 CASP Fund, AB1379 / SB1186 Certified Access Specialist (CASp) program fees for ADA Accessibility Improvements; derived from Business License renewals. Assembly Bill AB 1379 and Senate Bill SB 1186. 231 Successor Agency PA 1 RORF Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund (RORF) for Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) taxes received for debt service payments on recognized obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency (RDA). 235 SO Coast Air Quality Fund (AB2766, PM10) Contributions from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Uses are limited to the reduction and control of airborne pollutants. Assembly Bill AB 2766. 237 Successor Agency PA 1 Admin Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 for administration of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ROPS associated with the former Redevelopment Agency RDA . 241 Housing Authority Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housing. 243 RDA Low -Moderate Housing Fund Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housing. Accounts for RDA loan repayments 20 /o for Housing) and housing programs,. 244 Housing Grants Activites related Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) and SB2 grants for housing planning and development. 247 Economic Development Fund Proceeds from sale of City -owned land and transfers from General Fund for future economic development. 249 SA 2011 Low/Mod Bond Fund Successor Agency (SA) low/moderate housing fund; 2011 bonds refinanced in 2016. 250 Transportation DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - transportation related. 251 Parks & Rec. DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - parks and recreation. 252 Civic Center DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - Civic Center. 253 Library Development DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - library. 254 Community Center DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - community center. 255 Street Facility DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - streets. 256 Park Facility DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - parks. 257 Fire Protection DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - fire protection. 259 Maintenance Facilities DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - maintenance facilities. 270 Art In Public Places Fund Developer fees collected in lieu of art placement; utilized for acquisition, installation and maintenance of public artworks. 275 LQ Public Safety Officer Fund Annual transfer in from General Fund; distributed to public safety officers disabled or killed in the line of duty. 299 Interest Allocation Fund Interest earned on investments. 310 LQ Finance Authority Debt Service Fund Accounted for the debt service the Financing Authority's outstanding debt and any related reporting requirements. This bond was fully paid in October 2018. 401 Capital Improvement Program Fund Planning, design, and construction of various capital projects throughout the City. 405 SA PA 1 Capital Improvement Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 bond proceeds restricted by the bond indenture covenants. Used for SilverRock infrastructure improvements. 501 Equipment Replacement Fund Internal Service Fund for vehicles, heavy equipment, and related facilities. 502 Information Technology Fund Internal Service Fund for computer hardware and software and phone systems. 503 Park Equipment & Facility Fund Internal Service Fund for park equipment and facilities. 504 Insurance Fund Internal Service Fund for city-wide insurance coverages. 601 SilverRock Resort Fund Enterprise Fund for activities of the city -owned golf course. 602 SilverRock Golf Reserve Fund Enterprise Fund for golf course reserves for capital improvements. 760 Supplemental Pension Plan PARS Account Su lemental pension savings plan for excess retiree benefits to general employees of the City. 761 Other Post Benefit Obligation Trust (OPEB) For retiree medical benefits and unfunded liabilities. 762 Pension Trust Benefit (PARS Account) For all pension -related benefits and unfunded liabilities. 195 Page 3 of 3 196 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 11 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED JULY 12, 19, AND 26, 2024 RECOMMENDATION Approve demand registers dated July 12, 19, and 26, 2024. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — None FISCAL IMPACT Demand of Cash: City Successor Agency of RDA Housing Authority BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS $ 9,653,176.49 $ 28,856.16 $ 9,682,032.65 Routine bills and payroll must be paid between Council meetings. Attachment 1 details the weekly demand registers for July 12, 19, and 26, 2024. Warrants Issued: 214359-214417 $ 3,756,061.75 EFT 156 $ 191.96 EFT 157 $ 1,068.00 214418-214473 $ 1,262,301.88 214474-214545 $ 3,327,407.68 EFT 158 $ 168,511.49 Voids $ (3,444.61) Wire Transfers $ 870,747.68 Payroll Tax Transfers $ 59,439.66 Payroll Direct Deposit $ 239,747.16 $ 9,682,032.65 Six checks were voided and reissued. The voids were the result of the periodic review of stale -dated checks. 197 Vendor Account Name Amount Purpose Riverside County Sheriff Department Ortiz Enterprises, Inc. California Joint Powers Insurance American Asphalt South, Inc. Rutan & Tucker Various $2,692,955.36 May -June Police Services Construction $2,228,586.44 Dune Palms Bridge Progress Payments Various $1,034,245.00 Insurance Premiums Construction $1,018,930.27 PMP Slurry Improvements Progress Payment Various $168,511.49 Feb -April Legal Services Wire Transfers: Twenty -Eight transfers totaled $870,748. Of this amount, $362,992 was to CalPERS and $344,211 was to Landmark (See Attachment 2 for a complete listing). Purchase Orders/Contracts: As a normal course of operations, any purchase order (PO) over $50,000 must go to City Council for individual consideration. Additional POs under this threshold are reported quarterly for review. See attached list (Attachment 3) for POs with a value of $25,000 to $50,000 that were issued from April 1 to June 31. Investment Transactions: Full details of investment transactions, as well as total holdings, are reported quarterly in the Treasurer's Report. Settle Coupon Transaction Issuer Type Par Value Date Rate YTM Purchase Southern Bank of TN CD $ 248,000 7/12/2024 4.350% 4.350% Purchase Altaone Federal Credit Union CD $ 249,000 7/19/2024 4.450% 4.450% Purchase United States Treasury Treasury Note $ 1,000,000 7/19/2024 3.500% 4.140% Purchase Prevail Bank CD $ 249,000 7/24/2024 4.250% 4.250% Maturity Abacus Federal Savings Bank CD $ 248,000 7/26/2024 1.950% 1.950% Maturity Federal Farm Credit Banks Agency $ 500,000 7/26/2024 1.850% 1.870% Prepared by: Jesse Batres, Finance Technician Approved by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Attachments: 1. Demand Registers 2. Wire Transfers 3. Purchase Orders 198 ATTACHMENT 1 Demand Register Za Q"fra City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT03860 - 07/12/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101-GENERAL FUND REYES, LUCAS 156 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 191.96 111 NOTARY SERVICES 214359 06/2024 - FINGERPRINTING SCANNING Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 62.00 111 NOTARY SERVICES 214359 FY23/24 R/C FINGERPRINTING SVC TO 1... Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 -90.00 111 NOTARY SERVICES 214359 FY23/24 R/C FINGERPRINTING SVC FIR 1... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 90.00 ALTA VERDE BUILDERS, INC 214361 PM 10 DEPOSIT REFUND TM 34243 Developer Deposits 101-0000-22810 6,900.00 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC.. 214363 FY 24/25 APA MEMBERSHIP D.CASTRO Membership Dues 101-6001-60351 150.00 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC.. 214363 FY 24/25 APA MEMBERSHIP C.FLORES Membership Dues 101-6002-60351 150.00 AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOC.. 214363 FY 24/25 APA MEMBERSHIP S.FERNAND... Membership Dues 101-6002-60351 150.00 ANSAFONE CONTACT CENTE... 214364 07/2024 - PM 10 ANSWERING SERVICES PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 165.52 BATUTA, DANIELE 214365 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 198.02 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 SOLENOID FOR COVER RESTROOM SALE... Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -61.25 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 SOLENOID FOR COVER RESTROOM Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 803.25 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FLUSHOMETER FOR COVE RESTROOM 5... Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -16.10 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 SANITIZER PUMP FOR COVE RESTROOM Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 272.84 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FLUSHOMETER FOR COVE RESTROOM Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 220.05 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 ADMIN TRAINING C.ESCARREGA Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 299.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/27-07/11/24 - JOB POSTING ADMIN ... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 300.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 INTERVIEW LUNCH PANEL M&O SUPERV.. Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 110.61 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CJPIA SUPERVISOR ESSENTIAL SKILLS TR... Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 145.95 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CJPIA SUPERVISOR ESSENTIAL SKILLS TR... Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 482.02 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CJPIA DRIVER SAFETY TRAINING Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 205.76 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/24/26-06/23/27 ICC SUBSCRIPTION ... Prepaid Expense 101-0000-13600 705.67 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/24/25-06/23/26 ICC SUBSCRIPTION ... Prepaid Expense 101-0000-13600 705.67 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/24/24-06/23/25 ICC SUBSCRIPTION Membership Dues 101-2002-60351 705.66 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FS #70 HOSE REELS Materials/Supplies 101-2002-60431 528.50 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/05/24-06/05/25 - SPROUT SOCIAL 5... Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 1,271.16 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 07/2024 - APPLE MUSIC/STORAGE SUBS... Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 25.95 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/20/24 EMPLOYEE APPRCTN/ICE CRE... Employee Recognition Events 101-1004-60340 68.14 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/20/24 EMPLOYEE APPRCTN/ICE CRE... Employee Recognition Events 101-1004-60340 10.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/20/24 EMPLOYEE APPRCTN/ICE CRE... Employee Recognition Events 101-1004-60340 401.90 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/20/24 EMPLOYEE APPRCTN/ICE CRE... Employee Recognition Events 101-1004-60340 598.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 MANILA FOLDERS Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 52.90 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 MOUSE PAD & FLASH DRIVES Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 100.87 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 AP YELLOW PAPER Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 12.96 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FOOD FOR NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 67.24 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 MICROWAVE STEAM CLEANER & COVER Operating Supplies 101-2001-60420 20.64 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CHAIR WITH CANOPY SHADE Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 81.55 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FB POOL CPR SIGN Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 69.58 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FB POOL CPR SIGN Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 69.59 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/2024 - MAILCHIMP Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 219.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 2/1/24-1/31/25 - X-PARK MODULAR DE... Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 417.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 2/1/24-1/31/25 - X-PARK MODULAR DE... Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 417.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 2/1/24-1/31/25 - X-PARK MODULAR DE... Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 417.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 2/1/24-1/31/25 - X-PARK MODULAR DE... Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 417.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 HYDRATION SUPPLIES Safety Gear 101-3008-60427 85.13 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FIRE PANEL BATTERY Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 191.82 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FB POOL CPR SIGN & LETTER STICKERS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 23.74 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FB POOL KEEP GATE CLOSED SIGN Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 56.52 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 SANITARY NAPKIN DISPOSAL Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 409.47 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 ELECTRIC DOOR STRIKE Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 128.84 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 TIMER Operating Supplies 101-6001-60420 42.40 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 STANDING DESK Operating Supplies 101-6001-60420 212.05 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FLASH DRIVES Office Supplies 101-6004-60400 41.19 7/29/2024 7:34:47 PM 199 Page 1 of 6 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03860 - 07/12/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 WIRELESS MOUSE E.MOLINA Operating Supplies 101-6006-60420 51.10 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 PC MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 185.64 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 D&D/CM WORKING LUNCH Travel & Training 101-6001-60320 131.57 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 11/4-11/5/24 CPRS MAINT MANAGEME... Travel & Training 101-3005-60320 1,900.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 09/11/24 - CALTRAVEL SUMMIT Travel & Training 101-3007-60320 1,299.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/18/24 COUNCIL MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 123.48 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/12/24 ALL HANDS MTG FOOD -- EL T... Employee Recognition Events 101-1004-60340 1,375.69 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 LOBBY COFFEE MACHINE SUPPLIES Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 121.54 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FOOD FOR MARKETING PHOTOSHOOT Travel & Training 101-3007-60320 162.68 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 10/27-10/30/24 - CALIPERS FORUM HOT... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 284.26 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 10/28-10/30/24 - CALIPERS FORUM S.LA... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 549.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 10/28-10/30/24 - CALIPERS FORUM V.O... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 549.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 10/27-10/30/24 - CALIPERS FORUM HOT... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 284.26 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 07/2/24-07/01/25 - CDFA MEMBERSHIP... Membership Dues 101-1006-60351 675.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 PR SUPPLIES FOR FIRE STATIONS SALES ... Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 -78.74 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/20/24 EMPLOYEE APPRCTN/ICE CRE... Employee Recognition Events 101-1004-60340 1,155.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 PR SUPPLIES FOR FIRE STATIONS Volunteers - Fire 101-2002-60110 1,082.07 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 7/12/24 GCVCC LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 25.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 7/12/24 GCVCC LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 25.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 LEAGUE RIVCO MEETING D.MCGARREY Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 60.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 LEAGUE RIVCO MEETING J.PENA Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 60.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 LEAGUE RIVCO MEETING S.SANCHEZ Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 60.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 7/12/24 GCVCC LEGISLATIVE BREAKFAST.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 25.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 10/16-10/18/24 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 650.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 10/16-10/18/24 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 650.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 10/16-10/18/24 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 650.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 10/16-10/18/24 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 650.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 10/16-10/18/24 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 650.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 10/16-10/18/24 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF.. Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 650.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 COUNCIL MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 236.10 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CVAG ASSEMBLY PENA Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 51.50 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 29 PALMS FUNDRAISER L.EVANS Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 257.50 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 COUNCIL MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 228.21 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 COUNCIL MEETING DESSERTS Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 48.64 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/03/24 - CVAG ASSEMBLY DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 205.50 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 COUNCIL MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 170.71 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 COUNCIL MEETING SNACKS & DRINKS Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 60.01 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 LUNCH MCMILLEN Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 19.23 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CVAG ASSEMBLY MCMILLEN Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 51.50 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 SPECIAL JOINT MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 65.65 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 WATER FOR FIELD CREW Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 22.35 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 08/29-08/30/24 - CCAC WORKSHOP 0.... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 200.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FY 24/25 CCAC MEMBERSHIP M.RADEVA Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 250.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FY 24/25 CCAC MEMBERSHIP N.FUENTES Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 250.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FY 24/25 CCAC MEMBERSHIP O.RODRI... Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 250.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FY 24/25 CCAC MEMBERSHIP L.MCGINL... Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 250.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FY 24/25 CCAC MEMBERSHIP O.MOJICA Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 250.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 AWARD FRAMES Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 96.83 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 NOTARY TRAINING & SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-1005-60420 689.37 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 214371 06/29-07/28/24 - FS #32 INTERNET (649... Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 99.99 COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC 0... 214373 05/2024 - ARTS AND MUSIC LINE SHARE... Contributions to Other Agenc.. 101-7006-60480 1,520.75 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214374 FY 23/24 CANAL WATER SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 28,471.77 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 214375 FY 24/25 LAFCO FEES Membership Dues 101-1002-60351 9,083.48 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SE... 214376 05/2024 - ANIMAL SERVICES Animal Shelter Contract Servi... 101-6004-60197 28,923.65 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 214377 06/2024 - BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 70.00 DESERT RECREATION DISTRI... 214378 05/2024 - FB POOL OPERATIONS & PRO... Fritz Burns Pool Programming 101-3003-60184 76.68 DESERT RESORT MANAGEM... 214379 06/2024 - SECURITY PATROL SERVICES Professional Services 101-6004-60103 4,018.43 DESERT TREE SPRAYING 214380 FIREANTTREATMENT ATSRREVENT PA... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 350.00 FLORES, CHERI 214381 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 FROSTY'S AIR CONDITIONING... 214383 FS #32 ICE MACHINE MAINTENANCE Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 432.00 7/29/2024 7:34:47 PM 200 Page 2 of 6 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03860 - 07/12/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount GALLS LLC 214384 UNIFORM PANTS C.WOODS Uniforms 101-6004-60690 344.54 GALLS LLC 214384 CODE UNIFORMS Uniforms 101-6004-60690 87.00 GALLS LLC 214384 UNIFORM/BOOTS K.MEREDITH Uniforms 101-6004-60690 141.36 GHERA, EDWARD R 214385 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 JERNIGANS SPORTING GOOD... 214389 FY 24/25 SAFETY BOOTS L.REGALADO Safety Gear 101-3005-60427 184.86 KILEY & ASSOCIATES 214390 06/2024 - FEDERAL LOBBYIST SERVICES Contract Services - Administr... 101-1002-60101 3,500.00 LA PRENSA HISPANA 214391 07/11/24 - NOTICE OF ELECTION AD 20... Advertising 101-1005-60450 1,080.00 MAGALLON, ARMANDO 214392 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 191.92 MEREDITH, KEVIN 214393 FY 24/25 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 MONTENEGRO, ALEXIS 214394 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 MOYA, DANIEL 214395 WEED ABATEMENT APN 777-062-017 Lot Cleaning/Gravel Program 101-6004-60120 600.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214397 06/2024 - FB POOL MONTHLY MAINTEN... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 6,082.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214397 07/2024 - FB POOL MONTHLY MAINTEN... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 6,386.00 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 214399 ENVELOPES Printing 101-3007-60410 2,715.79 PROPER SOLUTIONS INC 214400 06/28/24 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES R.I... Temporary Agency Services 101-1004-60125 1,707.60 RAMOS STEAM & PRESSURE... 214401 PW YARD SOLAR PANEL CLEANING Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 1,296.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214402 05/24-06/25/24 - MOTOR FUEL CHARGES Sheriff - Other 101-2001-60176 391.89 SANCHEZ, TOMMI 214404 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASS... 214405 FY 24/25 MEMBERSHIP DUES ASSESSM... Membership Dues 101-1002-60351 5,483.00 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 214406 3 TO 5 FT BOULDERS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 2,217.02 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 214406 3 TO 5 FT BOULDERS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 2,012.55 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 214406 3 TO 5 FT BOULDERS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 2,062.37 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 214406 3 TO 5 FT BOULDERS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,961.86 STERICYCLE, INC 214407 05/24/24 - POLICE SHRED LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 19.25 TELLEZ, BENJAMIN 214408 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & R... 214409 05/01-06/30/24 - ONCALL PLANNING SE... Professional Services 101-6002-60103 4,505.18 TORRES WINDOW SOLUTION... 214411 SRR EVENT BUILDING DOOR UPGRADES Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 1,230.00 TORRES WINDOW SOLUTION... 214411 SRR EVENT BUILDING GLASS PANE INST... Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 3,050.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 214413 05/26-06/25/24 - LQPD CELLS (6852) Telephone - Utilities 101-2001-61300 889.42 VILLANUEVA, CELESTE 214415 FY24/25 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS R... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 214416 CELLULAR CARD IRRIGATION IQ4 CIVIC ... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 2,300.00 VISIT GREATER PALM SPRINGS 214417 FY 24/25 Q1 CITY FUNDING VGPS - Visit Greater Palm Spr... 101-3007-60151 98,442.73 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 260,292.50 Fund: 201- GAS TAX FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CONCRETE ROTARY MIXER RENTAL Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 753.66 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CONCRETE ROTARY MIXER DEPOSIT RE... Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 -440.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CONCRETE ROTARY MIXER RENTAL DEP... Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 -440.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CONCRETE ROTARY MIXER RENTAL Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 753.66 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CONCRETE ROTARY MIXER RENTAL Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 753.66 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CONCRETE ROTARY MIXER RENTAL DEP ... Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 -440.00 GRAINGER 214387 SAFETY GEAR Safety Gear 201-7003-60427 1,971.10 GRAINGER 214387 SAFETY GLASSES Safety Gear 201-7003-60427 272.57 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 214410 STREET SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 243.60 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 214410 HANDICAP PARKING SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 104.40 UNDERGROUND SERVICE AL... 214412 07/01/24 - DIG ALERT SERVICES Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 81.75 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total: 3,614.40 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND JERNIGANS SPORTING GOOD... 214389 FY 24/25 SAFETY BOOTS J.AGUIRRE Safety Gear 215-7004-60427 188.13 JERNIGANS SPORTING GOOD... 214389 FY 24/25 SAFETY BOOTS B.TELLEZ Safety Gear 215-7004-60427 173.99 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 214416 SRR RETENTION BASIN CLEANUP Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 1,200.00 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 214416 SRR RETENTION TREE REMOVALS Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 3,800.00 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 5,362.12 Fund: 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FY 24/25 CALED MEMBERSHIP G.VILLAL... Membership Dues 247-0000-60351 800.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 10/16-10/18/24 LEAGUE OF CITIES CONF.. Travel & Training 247-0000-60320 725.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 CVAG ASSEMBLY VILLALPANDO Travel & Training 247-0000-60320 51.75 IEDC 214388 07/01-12/31/24 - IEDC MEMBERSHIP G.... Marketing & Tourism Promot.. 247-0000-60461 925.00 Fund 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND Total: 2,501.75 7/29/2024 7:34:47 PM 201 Page 3 of 6 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03860 - 07/12/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS AMERICAN BUSINESS BANK 214362 04/2024 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE RETENTI... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 49,526.71 AMERICAN BUSINESS BANK 214362 05/2024 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE RETENTI... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 40,521.74 AMERICAN BUSINESS BANK 214362 06/2024 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE RETENTI... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 77,522.66 NEXTECH SYSTEMS, INC. 214396 GREEN POLARA BULLDOG III PPB PURC... Construction 401-0000-60188 5,024.25 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC. 214398 05/2024 - DUNE PALMS BRIDGE PROGR... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -40,521.74 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC. 214398 05/2024 - DUNE PALMS BRIDGE PROGR... Construction 401-0000-60188 810,434.65 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC. 214398 WALTERS WHOLESALE ELECTRIC STOP P... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -14,257.05 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC. 214398 06/2024 - DUNE PALMS BRIDGE PROGR... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -77,522.66 ORTIZ ENTERPRISES INC. 214398 06/2024 - DUNE PALMS BRIDGE PROGR... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,550,453.24 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 2,401,181.80 Fund: 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 UTILITY TRAILER 30SA-10BK4RG 16V1U... Machinery & Equipment 501-0000-80100 2,809.25 CHEVROLET CADILLAC 214372 LIGHT REPLACEMENT PART VIN N13313... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 241.04 S&D CARWASH MANAGEME... 214403 06/2024 -CAR WASH MEMBERSHIP Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 779.61 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 3,829.90 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/12/24-06/11/25 - ADOBE FOR CITY C... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 19.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/28-07/28/24 - MOBILE DEVICE MAN... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 324.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 FY 24/25 ADOBE HOMEBASE D. HANSEN Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 263.88 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 06/2024 - EMAIL MARKETING SOFTWARE Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 499.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 TELEPHONE ADAPTERS Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 466.96 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 COMPUTER MONITORS Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 732.72 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 TELEPHONE ADAPTER Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 121.30 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 TELEPHONE ADAPTER Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 121.30 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 STORAGE CABINET FOR IT ROOM Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 1,276.72 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 TV Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 1,358.85 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 MRKTG CAMERA EQUIP OSMO POCKET 3 Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 737.33 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 MRKTG VIDEO EQUIP BATTERY GRIP BL... Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 162.04 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 MRKTG VIDEO EQUIP BLCKMAGIC 6K P... Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 2,793.80 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 214366 MRKTG VIDEO EQUIP STORAGE CARDS Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 42.42 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 214371 06/24-07/23/24 - WC CABLE (4601) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 286.78 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214382 06/25-07/24/24 - CH INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 97.98 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214382 06/27-07/26/24 - CH INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 96.47 GOVINVEST, INC 214386 6/29/24-6/28/25 COSTING/FORECASTI... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 25,500.00 VERMONT SYSTEMS INC 214414 SOFTWARE LIC.aGREEMENT VERMONT ... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 1,200.00 VERMONT SYSTEMS INC 214414 SOFTWARE LIC. VERMONT SYSTEMS WE... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 7,324.70 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 43,426.24 Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND ALLIANT INSURANCE SERVIC... 214360 07/01/24-07/01/25 CRIME INSURANCE Crime Insurance 504-1010-60446 1,800.00 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 214370 FY 24/25 LIABILITY INSURANCE Liability Insurance 504-1010-60441 379,413.00 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 214370 FY 24/25 WORKERS COMP INSURANCE Workers Comp Premium 504-1010-60452 225,876.00 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 214370 07/1/24-07/1/25 - PROPERTY INSURAN... Property Insurance 504-1010-60443 151,865.00 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 214370 7/1/24-7/1/25 MECHANICAL INSURANC... Property Insurance 504-1010-60443 3,539.00 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 214370 7/1/24-7/1/25 VEHICLES INSURANCE PR... Property Insurance 504-1010-60443 16,742.00 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 214370 7/1/24-7/1/25 -ADMIN FEE & APPRAISA.. Property Insurance 504-1010-60443 15,148.00 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 214370 REFUND FOR MID -YEAR CHANGES Property Insurance 504-1010-60443 -338.00 CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS ... 214370 7/1/24-7/1/25 EARTHQUAKE/FLOOD IN... Earthquake Insurance 504-1010-60447 242,000.00 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total: 1,036,045.00 Grand Total: 3,756,253.71 7/29/2024 7:34:47 PM 202 Page 4 of 6 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03860 - 07/12/2024 JB Fund Summary Fund 101-GENERAL FUND 201- GAS TAX FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 504 - INSURANCE FUND Account Number 101-0000-13600 101-0000-20304 101-0000-22810 101-1001-60320 101-1002-60101 101-1002-60320 101-1002-60351 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60125 101-1004-60129 101-1004-60320 101-1004-60340 101-1005-60320 101-1005-60351 101-1005-60400 101-1005-60420 101-1005-60450 101-1006-60320 101-1006-60351 101-1006-60400 101-1007-60403 101-2001-60109 101-2001-60174 101-2001-60176 101-2001-60420 101-2001-61300 101-2002-60110 101-2002-60351 101-2002-60431 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61400 101-3002-60420 101-3003-60184 101-3005-60184 101-3005-60320 101-3005-60427 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60691 101-3007-60151 101-3007-60320 101-3007-60351 101-3007-60410 101-3008-60196 101-3008-60427 101-3008-60431 101-3008-60691 101-6001-60320 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Prepaid Expense Sales Taxes Payable Developer Deposits Travel & Training Contract Services - Admi... Travel & Training Membership Dues Annual Wellness Dollar ... Temporary Agency Servi... Recruiting/Pre-Employm... Travel & Training Employee Recognition E... Travel & Training Membership Dues Office Supplies Operating Supplies Advertising Travel & Training Membership Dues Office Supplies Citywide Supplies LQ Police Volunteers Blood/Alcohol Testing Sheriff - Other Operating Supplies Telephone - Utilities Volunteers - Fire Membership Dues Materials/Supplies Maintenance/Services Cable/Internet - Utilities Operating Supplies Fritz Burns Pool Progra... Fritz Burns Pool Mainten... Travel & Training Safety Gear Materials/Supplies Maintenance/Services VGPS - Visit Greater Palm.. Travel & Training Membership Dues Printing Annual Permits/Inspecti... Safety Gear Materials/Supplies Maintenance/Services Travel & Training Expense Amount 260,292.50 3,614.40 5,362.12 2,501.75 2,401,181.80 3,829.90 43,426.24 1,036,045.00 3,756,253.71 Expense Amount 1,411.34 -156.09 6,900.00 4,886.65 3,500.00 720.73 14,566.48 1,981.90 1,707.60 562.61 809.38 3,609.72 200.00 1,250.00 250.60 689.37 1,080.00 1,666.52 675.00 12.96 121.54 86.49 70.00 391.89 20.64 889.42 1,082.07 705.66 528.50 432.00 99.99 81.55 76.68 12,607.17 1,900.00 184.86 10,553.80 350.00 98,442.73 1,461.68 1,516.11 2,715.79 1,668.00 85.13 2,128.88 5,576.00 317.21 7/29/2024 7:34:47 PM 203 Page 5 of 6 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03860 - 07/12/2024 JB Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-6001-60351 Membership Dues 150.00 101-6001-60420 Operating Supplies 254.45 101-6002-60103 Professional Services 4,505.18 101-6002-60351 Membership Dues 300.00 101-6004-60103 Professional Services 4,018.43 101-6004-60120 Lot Cleaning/Gravel Prog.. 600.00 101-6004-60197 Animal Shelter Contract ... 28,923.65 101-6004-60400 Office Supplies 41.19 101-6004-60690 Uniforms 572.90 101-6006-60420 Operating Supplies 51.10 101-7001-60320 Travel & Training 299.00 101-7006-60146 PM 10 - Dust Control 28,637.29 101-7006-60480 Contributions to Other A... 1,520.75 201-7003-60427 Safety Gear 2,243.67 201-7003-60429 Traffic Control Signs 348.00 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 1,022.73 215-7004-60427 Safety Gear 362.12 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 5,000.00 247-0000-60320 Travel & Training 776.75 247-0000-60351 Membership Dues 800.00 247-0000-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pr... 925.00 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable 35,269.66 401-0000-60188 Construction 2,365,912.14 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 1,020.65 501-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 2,809.25 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 35,131.57 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 481.23 502-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 7,813.44 504-1010-60441 Liability Insurance 379,413.00 504-1010-60443 Property Insurance 186,956.00 504-1010-60446 Crime Insurance 1,800.00 504-1010-60447 Earthquake Insurance 242,000.00 504-1010-60452 Workers Comp Premium 225,876.00 Grand Total: 3,756,253.71 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 1,342,551.18 111205CT Construction Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-5' 2,360,887.89 111205RP Retention Payable Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-5' 35,269.66 13-005E ALTA VERDE BLDRS EXP ALTA VERDE BUILDERS INC 6,900.00 202008CB Contribution Expense Avenue 48 Art and Music Line Pr( 1,520.75 2324TMICT Construction Expense FY23/24Traffic Maintenance Imf 5,024.25 GOLFE Golf Tour Expense Golf Tour 81.55 STVRE Short Term Vacation Rental Expen... Short Term Vacation Rental Tracl 4,018.43 Grand Total: 3,756,253.71 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 7/29/2024 7:34:47 PM 204 Page 6 of 6 Demand Register 4Q"fa City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT03867 - 07/19/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101-GENERAL FUND JENSEN, SHARLA W 157 1 DAY SESSION CLASSES Instructors 101-3002-60107 144.00 JENSEN, SHARLA W 157 PERSONAL TRAINING 3 SESSIONS CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 132.00 JENSEN, SHARLA W 157 PERSONAL TRAINING 6 SESSIONS CLASS... Instructors 101-3002-60107 792.00 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 214420 07/05-08/04/24 - FS #32 CABLE/INTERN... Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 10.56 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 214420 06/24-07/23/24 - FS #93 CABLE (2415) Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 120.66 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 214420 07/03-08/02/24 - FS #93 INTERNET (351... Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 99.99 COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC 0... 214422 05/2024 - ARTS AND MUSIC LINE SHARE... Contributions to Other Agenc.. 101-7006-60480 71.81 COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC 0... 214422 05/2024 - ARTS AND MUSIC LINE SHARE... Contributions to Other Agenc.. 101-7006-60480 5,987.22 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214423 WATER SERVICE Water -Pioneer Park - Utilities 101-3005-61207 965.70 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214423 WATER SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 161.90 DATA TICKET, INC. 214425 04/2024 - POLICE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 210.30 DATA TICKET, INC. 214425 05/2024 - POLICE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 371.69 DATA TICKET, INC. 214425 06/2024 - POLICE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 486.81 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 214427 06/17-06/28/24 - LQ PARK PLAYGROUN... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 5,000.00 DESERT FIRE EXTINGUISHER ... 214429 PW YARD FIRE EXTINGUISHERS MAINTE... Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 220.66 DESERT FIRE EXTINGUISHER ... 214429 CITY BUILDINGS FIRE EXTINGUISHERS M... Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 1,142.41 DESERT RECREATION DISTRI... 214430 06/2024 - FB POOL OPERATIONS & PRO... Fritz Burns Pool Programming 101-3003-60184 7,120.35 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING.. 214431 FS #32 HVAC MAINTENANCE Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 275.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214432 06/26-07/25/24- POLICE INTERNET Cable/Internet- Utilities 101-2001-61400 536.20 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214432 07/2024 - LQ PARK PHONE Telephone - Utilities 101-3005-61300 49.12 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214432 06/28-07/27/24 - SPORTS COMPLEX PH... Telephone - Utilities 101-3005-61300 53.56 GALLS LLC 214433 BOOTS FOR C.WOODS Uniforms 101-6004-60690 141.32 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 ANNUAL B&C ADVERTISEMENT Advertising 101-1005-60450 1,102.30 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 PC PHN - CALLE ESTADO Advertising 101-6002-60450 301.84 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 NOI JEFFERSON SQUARE Advertising 101-6002-60450 306.75 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 PC PHN - MUNOZ BARN Advertising 101-6002-60450 306.75 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 PC PHN -TRAVERTINE Advertising 101-6002-60450 301.84 GARDAWORLD 214435 07/2024 - ARMORED SERVICES Professional Services 101-1006-60103 323.73 GRAINGER 214436 GENERATOR FOR CONCRETE CUTTING T... Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 2,381.27 GRAINGER 214436 CONCRETE REPAIR COMPOUND Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 368.14 GRAINGER 214436 EAR PLUGS & HYDRATION SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 172.76 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214439 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Monticello Park - Uti.. 101-3005-61102 13.62 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214439 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Colonel Paige - Utilit.. 101-3005-61108 12.34 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214439 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Community Park - U... 101-3005-61109 7,076.61 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214439 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Adams Park - Utiliti... 101-3005-61110 37.55 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214439 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Desert Pride - Utiliti... 101-3005-61114 13.78 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214439 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 101-3008-61101 20,113.55 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 04/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 86.25 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 04/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 270.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 625.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 607.50 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 540.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 877.50 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 135.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 230.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 337.50 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 202.50 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 115.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 540.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 202.50 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 202.50 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 172.50 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 452.50 7/29/2024 7:33:16 PM 205 Page 1 of 7 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03867 - 07/19/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 143.75 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 67.50 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 540.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 540.00 INTERWEST CONSULTING G... 214440 05/2024 - ONCALL BUILDING & SAFETY ... Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 101.25 KONE INC 214441 07/01-09/30/24 - CH ELEVATOR MAINT... Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 710.19 KOOLFOG, INC 214442 FB POOL MIST COOLING SYSTEM PUMP Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 3,355.48 MOWERS PLUS INC 214445 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 49.48 MOWERS PLUS INC 214445 POLE PRUNER CUTTER Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 325.59 MOWERS PLUS INC 214445 CONCRETE SAW Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 1,939.49 MOYA, DANIEL 214446 WEED ABATEMENT APN 774-141-005 Lot Cleaning/Gravel Program 101-6004-60120 700.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Consultants 101-7006-60104 1,050.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 DBE(9B)/QAP/ADA CALTRANS ... Consultants 101-7006-60104 62.50 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214448 FB POOL HANDRAIL COVER REPLACEME... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 199.37 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 214449 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-6004-60400 57.21 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 214449 RETURN SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 -31.31 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 214449 KEYBOARDS & MOUSE Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 99.54 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 214449 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 75.71 PAX FITNESS REPAIR 214450 WC GYM EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT P... Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 1,099.39 PROPER SOLUTIONS INC 214452 07/05/24 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES R.I... Temporary Agency Services 101-1004-60125 1,366.08 QUINN COMPANY 214453 BATTERIES FOR CH EQUIPMENT Machinery & Equipment 101-2002-80101 610.29 QUINN COMPANY 214453 BATTERY FOR WC EQUIPMENT Machinery & Equipment 101-2002-80101 414.51 QUINN COMPANY 214453 WC GENERATOR MAINTENANCE Machinery & Equipment 101-2002-80101 395.56 QUINN COMPANY 214453 FS #32 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE Machinery & Equipment 101-2002-80101 395.56 QUINN COMPANY 214453 FS #70 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE Machinery & Equipment 101-2002-80101 395.56 QUINN COMPANY 214453 FS #93 GENERATOR MAINTENANCE Machinery & Equipment 101-2002-80101 395.56 QUINN COMPANY 214453 YMCA GENERATOR MAINTENANCE Machinery & Equipment 101-2002-80101 395.56 QUINN COMPANY 214453 CH GENERATOR MAINTENANCE Machinery & Equipment 101-2002-80101 395.56 QUINN COMPANY 214453 CH GENERATOR REPAIRS Machinery & Equipment 101-2002-80101 1,445.70 SHIRY, TERESA 214454 BALLROOM BEGINNING CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 70.00 SHIRY, TERESA 214454 BALLROOM BEGINNING DI CLASSES Instructors 101-3002-60107 115.50 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 214455 IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 424.05 SOCAL LIGHTING PROS 214456 HOLIDAY TREE INSTALLATION & STORA... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 2,292.92 SPARKLETTS 214457 06/12/24 & 06/26/24 - DRINKING WATER Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 301.26 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 214459 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-3001-60400 31.72 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 214459 CITYWIDE CUPS Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 68.18 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 214459 POST -IT FLAGS Office Supplies 101-6004-60400 35.53 STATE CONTROLLER'S OFFICE 214460 FY 23/24 FTB OFFSETS Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 84.59 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 214461 06/2024 - SUNLINE PASSES Due toSunLine 101-0000-20305 51.00 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 214461 06/2024 - SUNLINE PASSES Miscellaneous Revenue 101-0000-42301 -3.75 THE LOCK SHOP, INC 214462 KEYS & KEY TAGS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 388.44 THE LOCK SHOP, INC 214462 KEYS FOR PARK RESTROOMS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 49.73 THE PRINTING PLACE 214463 RESIDENT CARD INFORMATION Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 202.57 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 214466 06/23-07/22/24 - EOC PHONE LINE SERV.. Telephone - Utilities 101-2002-61300 806.71 TRIPLETT, ALCADIA 214467 OFFICE SUPPLIES REIMB A.TRIPLETT Office Supplies 101-1004-60400 128.16 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 214468 LQ PARK RESTROOM URINAL REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 913.00 VILLALPANDO, GILBERT 214470 FY23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS R... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 VINTAGE E & S INC 214471 CIVIC PARK LIGHT FIXTURE REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 1,275.32 WILLIAMS, BILLEE 214472 PILATES CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 182.00 WILLIAMS, BILLEE 214472 YOGA FLOW CLASS Instructors 101-3002-60107 72.80 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 87,507.15 Fund: 201- GAS TAX FUND CV PIPELINE CORP 214424 CLEAN BUTTERCUP RETENTION BASIN Storm Drains 201-7003-60672 1,957.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 HURRICANE HILARY EMERGEN... Road Improvements 201-7003-72111 2,800.00 THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO. 214464 PAINT Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 27.80 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 214465 TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 1,027.14 ZUMAR INDUSTRIES INC 214473 STREET NAME SIGNS Traffic Control Signs 201-7003-60429 536.80 Fund 201- GAS TAX FUND Total: 6,349.24 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND DESERT FIRE EXTINGUISHER ... 214429 LIBRARY FIRE EXTINGUISHERS MAINTEN... Fire Extinguisher Service 202-3004-60664 171.83 7/29/2024 7:33:16 PM 206 Page 2 of 7 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03867 - 07/19/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount KONE INC 214441 07/01-09/30/24 - MUSEUM ELEVATOR ... Maintenance/Services 202-3006-60691 710.19 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 882.02 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214423 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 405.44 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 214428 LED LIGHT BULBS (20) & LIGHT POSTS (1... Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 413.06 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 214428 LED LIGHT BULBS (100) Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 873.29 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 214428 LED LIGHT BULBS (15) Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 136.51 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214432 06/10-07/09/24 - PHONE SVC Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 42.24 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 CITYWIDE LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCES... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 160.60 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 PARK LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVI... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 153.30 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 SRR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVIC... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 153.30 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 SRR LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVIC... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 6,935.00 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 L&L MAINTENANCE SERVICES AD Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 160.60 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 CREDIT ADJUSTMENT ORDER # 10038931 Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 -3,467.50 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 CREDIT ADJUSTMENT ORDER # 10038931 Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 -3,467.50 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214439 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric -Utilities 215-7004-61116 2,897.67 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214439 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 892.62 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214439 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric -Utilities 215-7004-61116 149.31 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214439 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric -Utilities 215-7004-61116 950.66 LANDMARK GOLF MANAGE... 214443 06/2024 - SRR PERIMETER LANDSCAPE ... SilverRock Way Landscape 215-7004-60143 5,320.00 MACIAS NURSERY, INC. 214444 PLANTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 2,614.08 VINTAGE E & S INC 214471 7/5-7/4/24 - RESTORE POWER TO IRRIG... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 1,012.98 VINTAGE E & S INC 214471 EISENHOWER STREET MEDIAN LIGHTING.. Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 6,973.05 VINTAGE E & S INC 214471 ROUNDABOUT LIGHT POLE REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 1,511.36 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 24,820.07 Fund: 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY VINTAGE E & S INC 214471 7/5/24 - DUNE PALMS MOBILE PARK FU... Building/Site Improvements 241-9104-72110 506.49 VINTAGE E & S INC 214471 DUNE PALMS MOBILE PARK FUSES REPL... Building/Site Improvements 241-9104-72110 7,009.24 Fund 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY Total: 7,515.73 Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH ... 214419 06/2024 PMP SLURRY SEAL IMPROVEM... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -53,627.91 AMERICAN ASPHALT SOUTH ... 214419 06/2024 PMP SLURRY SEAL IMPROVEM... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,072,558.18 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN BID AD Construction 401-0000-60188 1,985.60 GANNETT CALIFORNIA LOCAL.. 214434 DUNE PALMS RD PAVEMENT REHAB BID... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,941.80 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 FRITZ BURN PARK IMPROVEM... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 725.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 CORPORATE YARD Professional Services 401-0000-60103 187.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS LAKE I... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 112.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 2,487.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 AVE 50 WIDENING IMPROVEM... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 37.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 DUNE PALMS ROAD PAVEMENT.. Professional Services 401-0000-60103 525.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PL... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 2,475.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 BPMP BRIDGE PREVENATIVE ... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 725.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT PL... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 150.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 AVE 48 ART AND MUSIC LINE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 350.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 SPORTS COMPLEX LIGHTING R... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 350.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 COVE TRAILS PARKING LOT IM... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 700.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 HWY 111 REHABILITATION Professional Services 401-0000-60103 2,590.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 HIGHWAY 111 CORRIDOR Professional Services 401-0000-60103 987.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 LQ LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS Professional Services 401-0000-60103 1,337.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 AVE 50 BRIDGE Professional Services 401-0000-60103 2,137.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 VILLAGE ART/CULTURAL PLAZA Professional Services 401-0000-60103 925.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 - PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT P... Professional Services 401-0000-60103 10,552.50 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 SILVERROCK ART PEDISTALS Technical 401-0000-60108 37.50 PLANIT REPROGRAPHICS SYS... 214451 DUNE PALMS PAVEMENT REHAB CONS... Construction 401-0000-60188 274.19 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC 214458 06/2024 - ONCALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAI... Construction 401-0000-60188 1,522.00 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC 214458 06/2024 - ONCALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAI... Construction 401-0000-60188 7,343.97 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC 214458 06/2024 - ONCALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAI... Construction 401-0000-60188 7,343.97 ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC 214458 06/2024 - ONCALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAI... Construction 401-0000-60188 4,831.99 7/29/2024 7:33:16 PM 207 Page 3 of 7 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03867 - 07/19/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount ST. FRANCIS ELECTRIC, LLC 214458 06/2024 - ONCALL TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAI... Construction 401-0000-60188 4,831.99 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 1,076,398.28 Fund: 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT CHEVROLET CADILLAC 214421 2021 GMC YUKON VIN R326641 OIL CH... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 106.29 DESERT FIRE EXTINGUISHER ... 214429 CITY VEHICLES FIRE EXTINGUISHERS MA... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 1,453.14 HILARIO, BENJAMIN 214437 VEHICLE WASHES Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 410.00 NAI CONSULTING INC 214447 06/2024 CITY HALL ROOF REPAIR City Bldg Repl/Repair 501-0000-71103 512.50 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 2,481.93 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACORN TECHNOLOGY SERVI... 214418 LAPTOP REPLACEMENT SVCS & HEXNO... Consultants 502-0000-60104 4,427.50 DELL MARKETING LP 214426 07/01/24-03/31/25 MICROSOFT OFFICE... Prepaid Expense 502-0000-13600 33,040.53 DELL MARKETING LP 214426 04/1-06/30/24 MICROSOFT OFFICE 365 ... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 11,013.51 HUMANITY 214438 07/10/24-07/09/25 - HUMANITY SUBSC... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 1,467.75 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 214466 06/23-07/22/24 - PHONE LINE SERVICE Telephone - Utilities 502-0000-61300 3,076.33 VERIZON WIRELESS 214469 06/02-07/01/24 - CITY CELL SVC (5496) Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 3,545.44 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 56,571.06 Fund: 601- SILVERROCK RESORT GARDAWORLD 214435 GARDAWORLD 214435 GARDAWORLD 214435 07/2024 - SRR ARMORED SERVICES Bank Fees 601-0000-60455 713.87 06/2024 - SRR ARMORED SVC EXCESS IT... Bank Fees 601-0000-60455 26.52 06/2024 - SRR ARMORED EXCHANGE SVC Bank Fees 601-0000-60455 104.01 Fund 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 844.40 Grand Total: 1,263,369.88 7/29/2024 7:33:16 PM 208 Page 4 of 7 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03867 - 07/19/2024 JB Fund Summary Fund 101-GENERAL FUND 201- GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 601- SILVERROCK RESORT Account Number 101-0000-20305 101-0000-42301 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60125 101-1004-60400 101-1005-60400 101-1005-60450 101-1006-60103 101-1006-60400 101-1007-60403 101-2001-61400 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61300 101-2002-61400 101-2002-80101 101-3001-60400 101-3002-60107 101-3002-60420 101-3003-60149 101-3003-60184 101-3005-60184 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60691 101-3005-61102 101-3005-61108 101-3005-61109 101-3005-61110 101-3005-61114 101-3005-61207 101-3005-61300 101-3008-60196 101-3008-60431 101-3008-60691 101-3008-61101 101-6002-60450 101-6003-60118 101-6004-60111 101-6004-60120 101-6004-60400 101-6004-60690 101-7003-60420 101-7003-60432 101-7006-60104 101-7006-60146 101-7006-60480 201-7003-60429 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Due to SunLine Miscellaneous Revenue Annual Wellness Dollar ... Temporary Agency Servi... Office Supplies Office Supplies Advertising Professional Services Office Supplies Citywide Supplies Cable/Internet - Utilities Maintenance/Services Telephone - Utilities Cable/Internet - Utilities Machinery & Equipment Office Supplies Instructors Operating Supplies Community Experiences Fritz Burns Pool Progra... Fritz Burns Pool Mainten... Materials/Supplies Maintenance/Services Electric - Monticello Park... Electric - Colonel Paige -... Electric - Community Par... Electric - Adams Park - Ut.. Electric - Desert Pride - U.. Water -Pioneer Park - Uti.. Telephone - Utilities Annual Permits/Inspecti... Materials/Supplies Maintenance/Services Electricity - Utilities Advertising Plan Checks Administrative Citation ... Lot Cleaning/GravelProg.. Office Supplies Uniforms Operating Supplies Tools/Equipment Consultants PM 10 - Dust Control Contributions to Other A... Traffic Control Signs Expense Amount 87,507.15 6,349.24 882.02 24,820.07 7,515.73 1,076,398.28 2,481.93 56,571.06 844.40 1,263,369.88 Expense Amount 51.00 -3.75 200.00 1,366.08 128.16 99.54 1,102.30 323.73 44.40 68.18 536.20 275.00 806.71 231.21 4,843.86 31.72 1,508.30 1,301.96 2,292.92 7,120.35 3,554.85 812.49 6,275.32 13.62 12.34 7,076.61 37.55 13.78 965.70 102.68 1,363.07 49.73 1,623.19 20,113.55 1,217.18 6,988.75 1,153.39 700.00 92.74 141.32 842.16 4,695.83 1,112.50 161.90 6,059.03 1,563.94 7/29/2024 7:33:16 PM 209 Page 5 of 7 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03867 - 07/19/2024 JB Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 27.80 201-7003-60672 Storm Drains 1,957.50 201-7003-72111 Road Improvements 2,800.00 202-3004-60664 Fire Extinguisher Service 171.83 202-3006-60691 Maintenance/Services 710.19 215-7004-60143 SilverRock Way Landsca... 5,320.00 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 4,036.94 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 10,125.19 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 4,039.88 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utilit... 892.62 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utiliti... 405.44 241-9104-72110 Building/Site Improvers 7,515.73 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable -53,627.91 401-0000-60103 Professional Services 27,355.00 401-0000-60108 Technical 37.50 401-0000-60188 Construction 1,102,633.69 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 1,969.43 501-0000-71103 City Bldg Repl/Repair 512.50 502-0000-13600 Prepaid Expense 33,040.53 502-0000-60104 Consultants 4,427.50 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 12,481.26 502-0000-61300 Telephone - Utilities 3,076.33 502-0000-61301 Cell/Mobile Phones 3,545.44 601-0000-60455 Bank Fees 844.40 Grand Total: 1,263,369.88 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 165,107.77 111205P Professional Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-5' 2,487.50 201603P Professional Expense La Quinta Landscape Renovation 1,337.50 201606P Professional Expense Civic Center Campus Lake/Irrigati 112.50 201804E Landscape & Lighting Median Islan... Landscape & Lighting Median Isla 2,614.08 201805P Professional Expense Corporate Yard Admin Offices & 1 187.50 201901P Professional Expense Village Art Plaza Promenade & Ci 925.00 201902P Professional Expense Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning the E 2,137.50 201905P Professional Expense Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan 1 987.50 202008CB Contribution Expense Avenue 48 Art and Music Line Pr( 6,059.03 202008P Professional Expense Avenue 48 Art and Music Line Pr( 350.00 202101CT Construction Expense Dune Palms Rd Pavement Rehab- 2,215.99 202101P Professional Expense Dune Palms Rd Pavement Rehab- 525.00 202102P Professional Expense Fritz Burns Park Improvements 725.00 202204P Professional Expense Sports Complex Lighting Replacei 350.00 202205P Professional Expense Avenue 50 Widening Improveme 37.50 202216E General PW Maint - Desert Concep.. General PW Maintenance - Desei 5,000.00 202225P Professional Expense Highway 111 Rehabilitation Proje 2,590.00 202230P Professional Expense Cove Trails Parking Lot Improver 700.00 202315P Professional Expense FY22/23 Pavement Management 150.00 202316CT Construction Expense FY23/24 Pavement Management 1,074,543.78 202316P Professional Expense FY23/24 Pavement Management 2,475.00 202316RP Retention Payable FY23/24 Pavement Management -53,627.91 202320P Cyclone Hilary Professional Expense Tropical Cyclone Hilary 2,800.00 202328E Citywide Landscape Maintenance ... Citywide Landscape Maintenance 160.60 202329E Citywide Lighting Maintenance Srv... Citywide Lighting Maintenance Si 160.60 202330E Park Landscape Maintenance Servi... Park Landscape Maintenance Ser 153.30 202331E SilverRock Landscape Maintenance.. SilverRock Landscape Maintenan 153.30 202332P Professional Expense City Hall Roof Repair 512.50 202333P Professional Expense Bridge Preventative Maint Progre 725.00 7/29/2024 7:33:16 PM 210 Page 6 of 7 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03867 - 07/19/2024 JB Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount 202334P Professional Expense SilverRock Art Pedestals 37.50 2324PMPP Professional Expense FY23/24 Pavement Management 10,552.50 2324TMICT Construction Expense FY23/24Traffic Maintenance Imf 25,873.92 CSA152E CSA 152 Expenses CSA 152 Project Tracking 1,957.50 TREEE Tree Lighting Ceremony Expense Tree Lighting Ceremony 2,292.92 Grand Total: 1,263,369.88 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 7/29/2024 7:33:16 PM 211 Page 7 of 7 Demand Register City of La Quinta Packet: APPKT03876 - 07/26/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101-GENERAL FUND RUTAN & TUCKER 158 999290 - REIMBURSEMENT MATTERS Developer Deposits 101-0000-22810 2,430.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 999290 - REIMBURSEMENT MATTERS Developer Deposits 101-0000-22810 486.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 999284 - GENERAL Attorney 101-1003-60153 12,852.50 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 999288 - RETAINER MATTER Attorney 101-1003-60153 13,200.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 999287 - CODE ENFORCEMENT Attorney 101-1003-60153 2,550.24 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 999285 - PERSONNEL Attorney 101-1003-60153 14,141.27 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 999289 - SRR RESORT Attorney 101-1003-60153 8,340.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 999291- LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS/GPA.. Attorney 101-1003-60153 918.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 999286 - LITIGATION GENERAL Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 1,830.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 999292 - SRR/CYPRESS POINT FINANCI... Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 16,514.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997562 - SURPLUS LAND DISPOSITIONS Attorney 101-1003-60153 81.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997563 LQ VILLAGE APARTMENTS/GPA ... Attorney 101-1003-60153 3,240.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997560 SPHERE OF INFLUENCE MODIFI... Attorney 101-1003-60153 81.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997559 POWER TO THE PEOPLES FOR J... Attorney 101-1003-60153 510.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997552 - GENERAL Attorney 101-1003-60153 11,501.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997553 - PERSONNEL GENERAL Attorney 101-1003-60153 3,969.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997555 - CODE ENFORCEMENT Attorney 101-1003-60153 864.76 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997557 - RETAINER MATTER Attorney 101-1003-60153 13,200.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997558 - SRR RESORT Attorney 101-1003-60153 6,780.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997554 LITIGATION GENERAL Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 7,744.60 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997561 CAMILLE BARBER ADMINISTRAT... Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 1,026.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 998381- CODE ENFORCEMENT Attorney 101-1003-60153 432.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 998385 - DUNE PALMS ROW Attorney 101-1003-60153 60.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 998388 - SURPLUS LAND DISPOSITIONS Attorney 101-1003-60153 1,569.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 998387 POWER TO THE PEOPLE FOR JPA.. Attorney 101-1003-60153 2,430.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 998378 GENERAL Attorney 101-1003-60153 5,969.12 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 998386 - RESPONSES FOR PUBLIC RECO... Attorney 101-1003-60153 390.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 998384 - SRR RESORT Attorney 101-1003-60153 7,710.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 998379 - PERSONNEL Attorney 101-1003-60153 4,760.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 998383 - RETAINER MATTER Attorney 101-1003-60153 13,200.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 998380 - LITIGATION Attorney/Litigation 101-1003-60154 4,350.00 ALZHEIMERS COACHELLA VA... 214474 FY 23/24 COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT Grants & Economic Develop... 101-3001-60510 500.00 BARBARA SINATRA CHILDREN.. 214476 06/24/24 PHYSICAL EXAMS LA240780020 Sexual Assault Exam Fees 101-2001-60193 462.00 BERUMEN, ALFRED 214478 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 BRANDT, DOUGLAS M 214479 PERMIT REFUND PMER2024-0001 Digitization/Records Manag... 101-0000-42416 23.00 BRANDT, DOUGLAS M 214479 PERMIT REFUND PMER2024-0001 Public Works Dev. Plan Check.. 101-0000-42810 2,197.00 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH A... 214480 ON -CALL BUILDING PLAN REVIEW Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 4,106.90 BUREAU VERITAS NORTH A... 214480 ON -CALL BUILDING PLAN REVIEW Plan Checks 101-6003-60118 3,468.75 CASC ENGINEERING & CONS... 214484 06/2023 - ONCALL STORMWATER INSPE... Professional Services 101-7002-60103 555.00 COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC 0... 214487 06/2024 - ARTS AND MUSIC LINE SHARE... Contributions to Other Agenc.. 101-7006-60480 1,842.71 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSER... 214488 06/2024 - MSHCP FEES MSHCP Mitigation Fee 101-0000-20310 21,125.00 COACHELLA VALLEY CONSER... 214488 06/2024 - MSHCP FEES CVMSHCP Admin Fee 101-0000-43631 -211.25 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 748.55 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water -Monticello Park - Utili... 101-3005-61201 2,301.63 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water -Fritz Burns Park- Utili... 101-3005-61204 364.83 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water -Seasons Park - Utilities 101-3005-61208 29.10 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water -Community Park - Util.. 101-3005-61209 267.45 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-3008-61200 97.13 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water - Civic Center Park - Uti- 101-3005-61202 4,518.88 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water -Community Park - Util.. 101-3005-61209 5,078.43 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water -Desert Pride - Utilities 101-3005-61206 1,429.06 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 42.39 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 193.26 7/29/2024 6:52:56 PM 212 Page 1 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03876 - 07/26/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water -Eisenhower Park - Util.. 101-3005-61203 165.34 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water -Velasco Park - Utilities 101-3005-61205 133.96 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water -Fritz Burns Park- Utili... 101-3005-61204 2,064.08 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-3008-61200 672.16 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 214491 04/01-06/30/24 - EMERGENCY SVCS CO... Fire Service Costs 101-2002-60139 20,000.00 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PUBIL 214492 06/2024 - RADIO MAINTENANCE Operating Supplies 101-2001-60420 273.66 DATA TICKET, INC. 214493 07/2023 - CODE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 785.84 DATA TICKET, INC. 214493 06/2024 - CODE CITATION PROCESSING Administrative Citation Servi... 101-6004-60111 505.92 DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SE... 214494 06/2024 - ANIMAL SERVICES Animal Shelter Contract Servi.., 101-6004-60197 25,226.44 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVA... 214495 01/01-03/31/24 - SEISMIC HAZAED MA... SMIP Fees Payable 101-0000-20308 1,369.73 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVA... 214495 01/01-03/31/24 - SEISMIC HAZAED MA... SMIP Fees 101-0000-42610 -68.49 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVA... 214495 04/01-06/30/24 - SEISMIC HAZARD MA... SMIP Fees Payable 101-0000-20308 7,140.96 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVA... 214495 04/01-06/30/24 - SEISMIC HAZARD MA... SMIP Fees 101-0000-42610 -357.02 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 214496 7/2-7/5/24 BEAR CREEK TRAIL PLANT IN... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 5,980.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 214496 7/8-7/12/24 BEAR CREEK TRAIL PLANT I... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 6,970.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 214496 SINK HOLE REPAIR ON AVENIDA DIAZ Professional Services 101-7003-60103 17,850.00 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCH... 214498 02/08-03/06/24 - BP #9 SCHOOL RESOU... School Officer 101-2001-60168 11,788.43 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCH... 214498 03/07-05/01/24 BP #10 & 11 SCHOOL R... School Officer 101-2001-60168 33,220.48 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCH... 214498 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 SCHOOL RESO... School Officer 101-2001-60168 8,021.79 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUC... 214499 IRRIGATION PARTS FOR BEAR CREEK TRA.. Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 3,234.57 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUC... 214499 IRRIGATION PARTS FOR BEAR CREEK TRA.. Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,951.24 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUC... 214499 IRRIGATION PARTS FOR BEAR CREEK TRA.. Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 483.01 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUC... 214499 IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 631.71 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING.. 214500 CH HVAC MAINTENANCE HVAC 101-3008-60667 547.70 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING.. 214500 X-PARK HVAC MAINTENANCE HVAC 101-3008-60667 492.50 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING.. 214500 X-PARK HVAC DIAGNOSTIC HVAC 101-3008-60667 79.00 FIRST CHOICE A/C & HEATING.. 214500 CH HVAC MAINTENANCE HVAC 101-3008-60667 231.00 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 214502 GARNISHMENT Garnishments Payable 101-0000-20985 269.91 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 214503 GARNISHMENT Garnishments Payable 101-0000-20985 223.79 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 214504 GARNISHMENT Garnishments Payable 101-0000-20985 269.91 FRANCHISE TAX BOARD 214505 GARNISHMENT Garnishments Payable 101-0000-20985 243.29 GALLS LLC 214507 CODE UNIFORMS Uniforms 101-6004-60690 332.48 GOVOS, INC. 214510 STVR PERMITTING SOFTWARE NEW PA... Professional Services 101-1005-60103 4,500.00 HANSEN, DIANNE 214512 FY 23/24 TUITION REIMB D.HANSEN Training & Education/MOU 101-1004-60322 275.00 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214513 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 101-2002-61101 1,929.18 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214513 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity - Utilities 101-3008-61101 1,033.60 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214513 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - SilverRock Event Sit... 101-3005-61115 3,332.26 JOHNSON CONTROLS FIRE P... 214514 CH ALARM MAINTENANCE Security & Alarm 101-3008-60123 1,471.37 MADDEN MEDIA 214516 06/2024 - MEDIA SERVICES Marketing & Tourism Promot.. 101-3007-60461 103,799.05 MARTINEZ, CLAUDIA 214517 FY 23/24 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS ... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 MCMILLEN, JON 214518 4/9-4/11/24 - CJPIA SUMMIT TRAVEL RE... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 260.56 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI ... 214519 06/2024- JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 101-3008-60115 15,793.71 NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES I... 214520 06/2024 - SATELLITE PHONES Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 90.14 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 FB POOL WADING BACKWASH VALVE R... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 928.61 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 FB POOL HEATER REPAIRS Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 95.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 FB WADING POOL HEATER REPAIR Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 439.85 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 FB POOL/WADING POOL CONTROLLER ... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 427.92 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 CHEMICALS FOR FB POOL Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 241.52 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 CHEMICALS FOR FB POOL Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 215.45 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 CHEMICALS FOR FB POOL Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 983.06 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 FB WADING POOL SPA DRAIN REPLACE... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 650.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 FB POOL/WADING POOL FLOW VIS MET... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 1,786.57 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 FB WADING POOL FLOAT VALVE REPLAC... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 290.06 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 FB POOL HOLIDAY SERVICE CLEANING Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 225.00 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 FB POOL AUTOFILL FLOAT VALVE REPLA... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 122.18 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 CHEMICALS FOR FB POOL Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 635.68 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 214521 FB WADING POOL IPS CONTROLLER MA... Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 999.83 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 214522 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-6004-60400 419.13 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 214522 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-6004-60400 55.38 ODP BUSINESS SOLUTIONS, L... 214522 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 60.56 7/29/2024 6:52:56 PM 213 Page 2 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03876 - 07/26/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 214523 WC HVAC INSPECTION HVAC 101-3008-60667 720.35 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 214523 CH HVAC INSPECTION HVAC 101-3008-60667 537.00 PACIFIC WEST AIRCONDITIO... 214523 07/2024-CHWATER TREATMENT HVAC 101-3008-60667 125.00 PROPER SOLUTIONS INC 214524 07/12/24 - TEMP AGENCY SERVICES R.I... Temporary Agency Services 101-1004-60125 1,707.60 QUICK N EASY APPLIANCE SE... 214526 FS #93 REFRIGERATORS MAINTENANCE Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 381.00 RIVERSIDE ASSESSOR 214528 06/2024 - RECORDING FEES Technical 101-6004-60108 60.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE Sheriff Patrol 101-2001-60161 714,800.63 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE Police Overtime 101-2001-60162 60,412.91 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE Target Team 101-2001-60163 174,087.69 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE Community Services Officer 101-2001-60164 63,486.66 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE Gang Task Force 101-2001-60166 15,937.50 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE Narcotics Task Force 101-2001-60167 17,000.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE Motor Officer 101-2001-60169 131,506.41 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE Dedicated Sargeants 101-2001-60170 47,351.80 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE Dedicated Lieutenant 101-2001-60171 26,446.40 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE Sheriff - Mileage 101-2001-60172 34,424.96 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 2,209.68 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE Sheriff Patrol 101-2001-60161 808,131.54 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE Police Overtime 101-2001-60162 24,583.52 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE Target Team 101-2001-60163 171,793.44 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE Community Services Officer 101-2001-60164 65,968.47 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE Gang Task Force 101-2001-60166 19,125.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE Narcotics Task Force 101-2001-60167 17,000.00 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE Motor Officer 101-2001-60169 155,023.39 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE Dedicated Sargeants 101-2001-60170 52,482.80 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE Dedicated Lieutenant 101-2001-60171 29,752.20 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE Sheriff - Mileage 101-2001-60172 43,431.28 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 3,384.29 SANABRIA, ERNESTO 214530 FY 24/25 SAFETY BOOTS E.SANABRIA RE... Safety Gear 101-7006-60427 222.93 SILVERROCK RESORT 214531 04/01-06/30/24 - SALES AND USE TAXES Sales Taxes Payable 101-0000-20304 1,402.00 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 214532 IRRIGATION PARTS FOR BEAR CREEK TRA.. Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 66.16 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 214533 LABEL MARKER TAPES Office Supplies 101-3008-60400 45.66 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 214533 CARDSTOCK Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 27.50 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 214533 PENS Office Supplies 101-7001-60400 29.79 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 214534 05/2024 - SUNLINE PASSES Due toSunLine 101-0000-20305 211.00 SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY 214534 05/2024 - SUNLINE PASSES Miscellaneous Revenue 101-0000-42301 -10.00 TAG/AMS INC 214535 04/30/24 - RANDOM DOT TESTING Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 90.00 THE LOCK SHOP, INC 214537 DOOR LEVER Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 551.68 TKE ENGINEERING, INC. 214538 05/2024 - ON -CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERI ... Contract Traffic Engineer 101-7006-60144 13,031.22 TKE ENGINEERING, INC. 214538 06/2024 - ON -CALL TRAFFIC ENGINEERI ... Contract Traffic Engineer 101-7006-60144 12,144.56 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 214540 CONTRIBUTION United Way Deductions 101-0000-20981 32.00 UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 214540 CONTRIBUTION United Way Deductions 101-0000-20981 32.00 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 214541 FB PARK DRINKING FOUNTAIN REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 665.00 VERIZON WIRELESS 214542 06/14-07/13/24 - EOC CELL (7813) Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 207.76 VINTAGE E & S INC 214543 FB POOL GFCI RECEPTACLE REPAIR Fritz Burns Pool Maintenance 101-3005-60184 200.83 VIRAMONTES, ADAM R 214544 FY24/25 ANNUAL WELLNESS DOLLARS R... Annual Wellness Dollar Reim... 101-1004-50252 200.00 WOLFF WATERS 214545 OVERPAYMENT REFUND LIC-0111063 Over Payments, AR Policy 101-0000-20330 65.50 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 3,215,550.48 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 202-3006-61200 222.58 CONSOLIDATED ELECTRICAL ... 214490 FLUORESCENT BALLASTS (6) Maintenance/Services 202-3004-60691 233.13 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214506 07/13-08/12/24 - MUSEUM PHONE Telephone - Utilities 202-3006-61300 126.34 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 214519 06/2024- JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 202-3004-60115 3,264.32 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 214519 06/2024- JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 202-3006-60115 989.54 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 214523 LIBRARY HVAC INSPECTION HVAC 202-3004-60667 358.00 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 214523 07/2024 - LIBRARY WATER TREATMENT HVAC 202-3004-60667 125.00 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 214541 MUSEUM WOMEN'S RESTROOM REPAI... Maintenance/Services 202-3006-60691 1,950.00 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 7,268.91 Fund: 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/02-05/29/24 - BP #12 POLICE SERVICE COPS Burglary/Theft Prevent... 212-0000-60179 6,674.31 7/29/2024 6:52:56 PM 214 Page 3 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03876 - 07/26/2024 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE COPS Robbery Prevention 212-0000-60178 742.10 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 214529 05/30-06/30/24 - BP #13 POLICE SERVICE COPS Burglary/Theft Prevent... 212-0000-60179 7,198.38 Fund 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND Total: 14,614.79 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 4,024.77 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 3,164.84 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 214489 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 14,991.96 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 214497 LED LIGHTS (10) Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 583.65 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214506 07/07-08/06/24 - PHONE SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 137.74 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214506 07/10-08/09/24 - PHONE SVC Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 56.56 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214513 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 427.58 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214513 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 26.76 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214513 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 340.61 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214513 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 459.20 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 214513 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 149.67 PWLC II, INC 214525 6/17-6/19/24 WASHINGTON/SRR AVE 5... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 5,440.00 PWLC II, INC 214525 6/10-6/14/24 WASHINGTON/SRR AVE 5... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 9,600.00 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 214532 QUICK TIES & LODGE POLES Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 459.47 VINTAGE E & S INC 214543 AVE 52 MEDIAN LIGHTING UPGRADES Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 6,594.58 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 46,457.39 Fund: 224 - TUMF FUND COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC 0... 214487 06/2024 - TUMF FEES TUMF Payable to CVAG 224-0000-20320 41,100.00 Fund 224 - TUMF FUND Total: 41,100.00 Fund: 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY RUTAN & TUCKER 158 997556 HOUSING AUTHORITY Attorney 241-9101-60153 5,142.00 RUTAN & TUCKER 158 998382 - HOUSING AUTHORITY Attorney 241-9101-60153 240.00 CAHA, BECKY 214481 06/2024 - HOUSING CONSULTANT SERV... Professional Services 241-9101-60103 4,175.00 Fund 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY Total: 9,557.00 Fund: 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS BENGAL ENGINEERING INC 214477 3/2024 DUNE PALMS BRIDGE LOW WAT... Design 401-0000-60185 12,398.87 HAMMEL, GREEN, AND ABR... 214511 05/2024 - CULTURAL CAMPUS DESIGN Design 401-0000-60185 18,718.00 1TB SUPPLY CO., INC. 214515 COUNTDOWN LED ITE Construction 401-0000-60188 2,610.00 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & R... 214536 05/01-06/30/24 - ONCALL PLANNING SE... Design 401-0000-60185 877.50 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & R... 214536 05/01-06/30/24 - ONCALL PLANNING SE... Design 401-0000-60185 243.75 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 34,848.12 Fund: 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 AUTOZONE 214475 CARQUEST 214483 CHEVROLET CADILLAC 214486 BATTERY Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 BATTERY Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 BATTERY CORE REFUND Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 WIPER BLADES Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 RETURN BATTERY Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 BUG REMOVER WASHER FLUID Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 BATTERIES Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 ANTIFREEZE Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 BATTERY CLEANING SUPPLIES & TRAILER.. Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 HOOD LIFT SUPPORT Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 AIR FILTERS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 TRANSMISSION FUNNEL & LITTLE TREE A.. Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 AIR FILTERS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 VEHICLE MAINTENANCE SUPPLIES Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 BATTERY Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 BATTERY CORE REFUND Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 BATTERY Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 BATTERY CORE REFUND Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 WIPER BLADES Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 MUD FLAPS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 2017 CHEVY COLORADO VIN H1244342 ... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 Fund 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 163.11 229.28 -22.00 37.50 -244.75 6.30 15.98 65.22 82.23 36.95 114.14 8.24 114.14 65.45 185.78 -22.00 185.78 -22.00 49.48 46.46 1,080.34 2,175.63 7/29/2024 6:52:56 PM 215 Page 4 of 8 Demand Register Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BRANDT, DOUGLAS M 214479 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY C... 214482 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 214485 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 214485 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 214485 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS- 214485 FISHER INTEGRATED INC 214501 FISHER INTEGRATED INC 214501 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214506 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214506 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214506 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 214506 GOVERN MENTJOBS.COM INC. 214509 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. 214527 TRITON TECHNOLOGY SOLUT... 214539 TRITON TECHNOLOGY SOLUT... 214539 VERIZON WIRELESS 214542 VERIZON WIRELESS 214542 Fund: 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND GAMETIME 214508 Packet: APPKT03876 - 07/26/2024 JB Account Name Account Number Amount PERMIT REFUND PMER2024-0001 Technology Enhancement Su... 502-0000-43611 7/1/24-6/30/25 - ASSET MANAGEMENT ... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 06/15-07/14/24 - WC CABLE (8105) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 07/2024 - CH CABLE (4625) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 07/10-08/09/24 - CH INTERNET (2546) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 07/12-08/11/24 - CITY YARD CABLE (408... Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 06/2024 CC VIDEO STREAMING Consultants 502-0000-60104 06/2024 MONTHLY FEE Consultants 502-0000-60104 07/03-08/02/24 - 2ND CITY INTERNET LI... Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 07/12-08/11/24 - X PARK INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 07/04-08/03/24 - WC INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 07/04-08/03/24 - DSL SVC Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 07/1/24-06/30/25 NEOGOV HR SOFTW... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 06/2024 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 5... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 CABLECAST PUBLIC MEETING LIVESTRE... Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 CABLECAST PUBLIC MEETING LIVESTRE... Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 06/02-07/01/24 -BACKUP SERVER (2183) Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 06/02-07/01/24 - CITY IPADS (5587) Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: LQ PARK PERIMETER FITNESS EQUIPME... Parks 8.00 37,997.06 166.60 189.93 2,079.00 82.07 1,500.00 1,100.00 2,580.00 1,070.00 704.17 712.34 14,157.17 1,974.00 2,277.00 70.69 133.83 1,255.97 68,057.83 503-0000-71060 56,289.02 Fund 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND Total: 56,289.02 Grand Total: 3,495,919.17 7/29/2024 6:52:56 PM 216 Page 5 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03876 - 07/26/2024 JB Fund Summary Fund 101-GENERAL FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 224-TUMFFUND 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501- FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND Account Number 101-0000-20304 101-0000-20305 101-0000-20308 101-0000-20310 101-0000-20330 101-0000-20981 101-0000-20985 101-0000-22810 101-0000-42301 101-0000-42416 101-0000-42610 101-0000-42810 101-0000-43631 101-1002-60320 101-1003-60153 101-1003-60154 101-1004-50252 101-1004-60104 101-1004-60125 101-1004-60322 101-1005-60103 101-1005-60400 101-2001-60161 101-2001-60162 101-2001-60163 101-2001-60164 101-2001-60166 101-2001-60167 101-2001-60168 101-2001-60169 101-2001-60170 101-2001-60171 101-2001-60172 101-2001-60175 101-2001-60193 101-2001-60420 101-2002-60139 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61101 101-2002-61200 101-2002-61304 101-3001-60510 101-3005-60184 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60691 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Sales Taxes Payable Due to SunLine SMIP Fees Payable MSHCP Mitigation Fee Over Payments, AR Policy United Way Deductions Garnishments Payable Developer Deposits Miscellaneous Revenue Digitization/Records Ma... SMIP Fees Public Works Dev. Plan ... CVMSHCP Admin Fee Travel & Training Attorney Attorney/Litigation Annual Wellness Dollar ... Consultants/Employee 5... Temporary Agency Servi... Training & Education/M... Professional Services Office Supplies Sheriff Patrol Police Overtime Target Team Community Services Offi... Gang Task Force Narcotics Task Force School Officer Motor Officer Dedicated Sargeants Dedicated Lieutenant Sheriff - Mileage Special Enforcement Fu... Sexual Assault Exam Fees Operating Supplies Fire Service Costs Maintenance/Services Electricity - Utilities Water - Utilities Mobile/Cell Phones/Sate.. Grants & Economic Deve... Fritz Burns Pool Mainten... Materials/Supplies Maintenance/Services Expense Amount 3,215,550.48 7,268.91 14,614.79 46,457.39 41,100.00 9,557.00 34,848.12 2,175.63 68,057.83 56,289.02 3,495,919.17 Expense Amount 1,402.00 211.00 8,510.69 21,125.00 65.50 64.00 1,006.90 2,916.00 -10.00 23.00 -425.51 2,197.00 -211.25 260.56 128,748.89 31,464.60 600.00 90.00 1,707.60 275.00 4,500.00 88.06 1,522,932.17 84,996.43 345,881.13 129,455.13 35,062.50 34,000.00 53,030.70 286,529.80 99,834.60 56,198.60 77,856.24 5,593.97 462.00 273.66 20,000.00 381.00 1,929.18 941.81 297.90 500.00 8,241.56 6,918.37 12,950.00 7/29/2024 6:52:56 PM 217 Page 6 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03876 - 07/26/2024 JB Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3005-61115 Electric - SilverRock Even... 3,332.26 101-3005-61201 Water -Monticello Park -... 2,301.63 101-3005-61202 Water - Civic Center Park.. 4,518.88 101-3005-61203 Water -Eisenhower Park ... 165.34 101-3005-61204 Water -Fritz Burns Park-... 2,428.91 101-3005-61205 Water -Velasco Park - Uti.. 133.96 101-3005-61206 Water -Desert Pride - Util.. 1,429.06 101-3005-61208 Water -Seasons Park - Ut.. 29.10 101-3005-61209 Water -Community Park... 5,345.88 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pr... 103,799.05 101-3008-60115 Janitorial 15,793.71 101-3008-60123 Security & Alarm 1,471.37 101-3008-60400 Office Supplies 45.66 101-3008-60667 HVAC 2,732.55 101-3008-60691 Maintenance/Services 665.00 101-3008-61101 Electricity - Utilities 1,033.60 101-3008-61200 Water - Utilities 769.29 101-6003-60118 Plan Checks 7,575.65 101-6004-60108 Technical 60.00 101-6004-60111 Administrative Citation ... 1,291.76 101-6004-60197 Animal Shelter Contract ... 25,226.44 101-6004-60400 Office Supplies 474.51 101-6004-60690 Uniforms 332.48 101-7001-60400 Office Supplies 29.79 101-7002-60103 Professional Services 555.00 101-7003-60103 Professional Services 17,850.00 101-7006-60144 Contract Traffic Engineer 25,175.78 101-7006-60146 PM 10 - Dust Control 42.39 101-7006-60427 Safety Gear 222.93 101-7006-60480 Contributions to Other A... 1,842.71 202-3004-60115 Janitorial 3,264.32 202-3004-60667 HVAC 483.00 202-3004-60691 Maintenance/Services 233.13 202-3006-60115 Janitorial 989.54 202-3006-60691 Maintenance/Services 1,950.00 202-3006-61200 Water - Utilities 222.58 202-3006-61300 Telephone - Utilities 126.34 212-0000-60178 COPS Robbery Prevention 742.10 212-0000-60179 COPS Burglary/Theft Pre... 13,872.69 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 1,043.12 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 21,634.58 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 1,112.16 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utilit... 485.96 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians - Utiliti... 22,181.57 224-0000-20320 TUMF Payable to CVAG 41,100.00 241-9101-60103 Professional Services 4,175.00 241-9101-60153 Attorney 5,382.00 401-0000-60185 Design 32,238.12 401-0000-60188 Construction 2,610.00 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and ... 1,095.29 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 1,080.34 502-0000-43611 Technology Enhancemen.. 8.00 502-0000-60104 Consultants 2,600.00 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 54,128.23 502-0000-61301 Cell/Mobile Phones 1,255.97 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 7,717.94 502-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 2,347.69 7/29/2024 6:52:56 PM 218 Page 7 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT03876 - 07/26/2024 JB Account Number 503-0000-71060 Project Account Key **None** 111205D 18-002E 201804E 201901D 201905D 202008CB 202216E 202322D 202326E 21-003E 2425TM ICT CSA152E STVRE Account Summary Account Name Expense Amount Parks 56,289.02 Grand Total: 3,495,919.17 Project Account Summary Project Account Name **None** Design Expense TRAVERTINE CORPORATION EXP Landscape & Lighting Median Islan... Design Expense Design Expense Contribution Expense General PW Maint - Desert Concep.. Design Expense La Quinta Park Fitness Equipment THE WAVE EXP Construction Expense CSA 152 Expenses Short Term Vacation Rental Expen... Grand Total: Project Name **None** Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-5' TRAVERTINE CORPORATION Landscape & Lighting Median Islz Village Art Plaza Promenade & Ci Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan I Avenue 48 Art and Music Line Pr( General PW Maintenance - Desei Eisenhower Retention Basin Slop La Quinta Park Fitness Equipmen CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT FY24/25 Traffic Maintenance Imf CSA 152 Project Tracking Short Term Vacation Rental Tracl 3,495,919.17 Expense Amount 3,355,483.74 12,398.87 2,430.00 21,634.58 18,718.00 877.50 1,842.71 17,850.00 243.75 56,289.02 486.00 2,610.00 555.00 4,500.00 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 7/29/2024 6:52:56 PM 219 Page 8 of 8 ATTACHMENT 2 City of La Quinta Bank Transactions 7/08/2024-7/26/2024 Wire Transaction Listed below are the wire transfers from 7/08/2024-7/26/2024 Wire Transfers: 07/08/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $5,860.87 07/08/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $15,320.90 07/08/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $29,641.11 07/08/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA $432.00 07/08/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSION SQUARE $3,900.00 07/08/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSION SQUARE $41,098.19 07/09/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - STERLING $1,308.30 07/09/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $138,451.08 07/09/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - STERLING $29.17 07/12/2024 -WIRE TRANSFER - AMERITAS $89.96 07/12/2024 -WIRE TRANSFER - AMERITAS $1,754.17 07/12/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - STANDARD OF OREGON $3,036.72 07/12/2024 -WIRE TRANSFER - AMERITAS $12,710.70 07/12/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - MIDAMERICA $17,523.52 07/12/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - MIDAMERICA $18,223.52 07/16/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $120,377.00 07/17/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK $50,000.00 07/17/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK $176,124.97 07/17/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - J&H ASSET PROPERTY MANAGEMENT $45,085.56 07/19/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - LQCEA $432.00 07/19/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSION SQUARE $3,900.00 07/19/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSION SQUARE $12,713.19 07/22/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $200.98 07/22/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $5,878.02 07/22/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $15,857.60 07/22/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $31,403.99 07/23/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - STERLING $1,308.30 07/24/2024 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK $118,085.86 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $870,747.68 220 ATTACHMENT 3 City of La Quinta Purchase Orders 04/1/24 — 06/30/24 Purchase Orders Listed below are Purchase Orders issued from 04/1/24 — 06/30/24 with a value between $25,000 and $50,000 for City Council review. Vendor Arborpro, Inc. BMW Motorcycles of Escondido Dave Bang, Inc. Southwest Boulder & Stone P.O Number Amount Purpose 2324-0214 $ 39,250.00 Tree Inventory Services 2324-0216 $ 31,594.70 Police Motorcycle 2324-0241 $ 36,314.99 Eighteen Picnic Tables for La Quinta Park 2324-0242 $ 30,000.00 Landscape Boulders 221 222 BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT FOR YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2023 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report for the year ended June 30, 2023. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • California cities must obtain an annual audit of their financial statements by an independent auditor at the close of each fiscal year. • The annual audit produces the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) (Exhibit A), which was issued on July 19, 2024. • The independent auditors rendered an unmodified ("clean") opinion, which is the most favorable conclusion. • The Financial Advisory Commission (FAC) has been provided the ACFR for review and a presentation will be provided at the August 14, 2024 meeting. FISCAL IMPACT - None BACKGROUND/ANALYS At the end of each fiscal year, the City's financial records are audited by an independent audit firm pursuant to California law. The results (including City background information, statistical data, and detailed financial reports) are compiled and presented in the ACFR. In the independent auditors' report (located at the front of the financial section of the ACFR), Eide Bailly Certified Public Accountants issued an unmodified opinion on the City's financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2023, which is the most favorable conclusion. The independent audit involved examining evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. 223 Attachment 1, provides a summary of the ACFR which is in Exhibit A. Attachment 2, provides a summary of Unrestricted Funds. The Financial Advisory Commission has been provided with a copy of the ACFR and a presentation will follow at their meeting on August 14, 2024. In addition, a copy of the ACFR can be found in the Finance section on the City's website. While the City's financial statements were presented fairly in all significant aspects, a material weakness in the City's internal controls over financial reporting was identified for accounting entry adjustments, entries were fully resolved prior to issuance. As in previous years, the ACFR will be submitted to the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) award program for excellence in financial reporting. A Single Audit for fiscal year 2022/23 — a separate audit requirement under Federal law for entities that spend $750,000 or more in federal funds during a fiscal year, was issued on July 25, 2024. ALTERNATIVES The ACFR and audit are required by State law, therefore, no alternatives are recommended. Prepared by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. 2022/23 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report Summary 2. 2022/23 Unrestricted Funds Summary 3. 2022/23 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report 224 ATTACHMENT 1 r Fiscal Year 2022/23 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) ce QWKra CALIFORNIA Summary Summary of ACFR Contents The fiscal year (FY) 2022/23 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) (Exhibit A) contains numerous comprehensive financial reports pertaining to all aspects of the City's finances and includes financial statements for all City funds (general, special revenue, housing, capital project, internal service, and other fund types). The ACFR also contains information regarding the City's accounting methods and procedures, and the results of the independent audit. Financial information is conveyed both by major fund type and in a comprehensive manner; thus, the information is somewhat complex to interpret. Because of this, specific detailed information regarding the General Fund year-end budget results for FY 2022/23 was presented separately at the January 16, 2024, Council meeting. The Management Discussion and Analysis section provides an overview and analysis of the financial statements, which is useful when reading through the ACFR. In addition, the Notes to the Basic Financial Statements provide a written explanation of accounting methods and year -over -year changes. The Statistical Section presents a ten-year comparison of City financial, economic, and demographic trends. Responsibility for both the accuracy and the completeness of all disclosures rests with the City of La Quinta. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is accurate in all material respects and is reported in a manner designed to fairly present the financial position and results of City operations. The ACFR was prepared in conformance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The City's financial reporting is based upon all Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) pronouncements; these pronouncements are the most authoritative source of governmental GAAP. Eide Bailly LLP, Certified Public Accountants, has issued an unmodified ("clean") opinion on the City's financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2023, which is the most favorable conclusion. While the City's financial statements were presented fairly in all significant aspects, a material weakness in the City's internal controls over financial reporting was identified for accounting entry adjustments from both the current and prior years, all entries were fully resolved prior to issuance of the ACFR. In addition, the City is in the process of implementing additional internal procedures and guidance related to financial reporting to improve the accuracy of the information presented. We believe that the ACFR meets the Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Program requirements and have submitted it to determine eligibility for another certificate. The City has previously received this prestigious award for the last twenty-six years. 225 Significant Changes and Financial Highlights Governmental Revenues and Expenses Governmental Activities include thirty-one (31) individual governmental funds. There are four (4) major governmental funds: the General Fund, one Capital Improvement capital project fund, one Housing Authority special revenue fund, and one Disaster Recovery special revenue fund. Data from the other twenty-seven (27) governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregate presentation. Key Highlights: • General Fund's overall fund balance increased by approximately $20.1 million when compared to the ending balance in FY 2021/22. This was mostly attributed to transient occupancy tax and sales tax revenue exceeding budget projections, coupled with expenditure savings. • General Fund Reserves are 100% funded to established target amounts for FY 2022/23 representing a combined balance of $45 million. • At the end of FY 2022/23, the City had positive balances in all three categories of Net Position (Net Investment in Capital Assets, Restricted, and Unrestricted) for the governmental and business -type activities. • Governmental revenues increased over the prior fiscal year with the major items being attributed to investment income, fair value of investments, and property taxes, which were then offset by decreases in charges for services, and capital grants and contributions. • A majority of General Fund revenues experienced positive variances when compared to the final budget. • Actual expenses were $48.2 million lower than the final budget, of which $2.6 million was carried over into FY 2023/24 for continuing appropriations related to operations. Funds not being carried over are recognized as Unassigned Fund Balance in the General Fund. Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) revenue commitments totaling $22.6 million are reflected in Assigned reserves and operational carryovers are noted in Committed reserves. Governmental Fund Balances The focus of the City's governmental funds is to provide information on near -term inflows, outflows, and balances. Such information is useful in assessing the City's financing requirements. In particular, Unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. The Unassigned General Fund balance comprised $44,105,041, or 24%, of the total $185,977,508 balance and included savings from total final FY 2022/23 General Fund budgeted expenditures including transfers and multi -year capital project carryovers. As of the end of FY 2022/23, the City's total governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances of $239,819,968 and General Fund balances of $185,977,508 as follows: 226 2022/23 Governmental Fund Balances Category General Fund Percent All Other Funds Percent Total Funds Percent Nonspendable $ 25,130,438 14% $ 468 0.001% $ 25,130,906 10% Restricted 5,317,487 3% 61,906,132 115% 67,223,619 28% Committed 47,600,009 26% - 0% 47,600,009 20% Assigned 63,824,533 34% - 0% 63,824,533 27% Unassigned 1 44,105,041 24% (8,064,140) -15% 36,040,901 15% TOTAL $ 185,977,508 100% $ 53,842,460 100% $ 239,819,968 100% When compared to FY 2021/22, total governmental fund balance increased by $22,697,904 and total General Fund balance increased by $20,070,495. 2021/22 Governmental Fund Balances Category General Fund Percent All Other Funds Percent Total Funds Percent Nonspendable $ 27,365,989 16% $ 96,590 0.189% $ 27,462,579 13% Restricted 10,137,888 6% 54,412,358 106% 64,550,246 30% Committed 37,209,100 22% - 0% 37,209,100 17% Assigned 57,300,711 35% - 0% 57,300,711 26% Unassigned 33,893,325 20% 3,293,897 -6% 30,599,428 14 0 $ 165,907,013 100% $ 51,215,051 100% $ 217,122,064 100% TOTAL General Fund Balances A year -over -year decrease of $2,236,000 in Nonspendable is mainly attributed to the FY 2022/23 Redevelopment Agency (RDA) loan repayment of $2,696,000 offset by interest earnings of $381,000 resulting in a net decrease of $2,315,000 in Due from Other Governments. The outstanding loan balance to the RDA of $24,501,000 is recognized as 80% in the General Fund and 20% in the Housing Authority Fund. Additional information on the loan repayment can be found in Note 19 of the financial statements. Restricted reserves are limited to funds held in a Section 115 Pension Trust, set aside to fund the City's pension obligations. As of FY 2021/22, the trust balance was at $10.1 million and, due to a one-time additional discretionary payment of $5,000,000 made to CalPERS to pay down the City's unfunded pension obligations, the updated balance is $5.3 million. All Other Funds fund balance decreased by $7,494,000 and represents totals for the Housing Fund and other Restricted funds. Committed reserves increased by approximately $10,391,000 due to operational carryovers and the recent update to the City's Reserve Policy, which included increasing and funding the new target levels for the Natural Disaster Emergency Reserve, Economic Downturn Reserve, and the Capital Improvement Reserve categories. All reserve categories are fully funded to current target levels. An increase of $6,524,000 in assigned reserves was due to Measure G sales tax reserve of $13,859,000 which included advanced funding reimbursed back to reserves for the Dune Palms Bridge project and $803,000 in the fire services trust. 227 Outstanding Debt Total governmental activities debt decreased by $254,013 from $1,957,439 to $1,703,426. This decrease is attributed to a reduction of $109,537 in leases and $314,809 in subscription IT liabilities offset by an increase of $191,861 in compensated absences. Governmental Activities 2022 Debt Type: As Restated 2023 Leases $ 162,648 $ 53,111 Financed Purchases 22,079 551 Compensated Absences 962,229 1,154,090 Subscription IT liabilities 810,483 495,674 TOTAL $ 1,957,439 $ 1,703,426 The City adopted and implemented GASB Statement No. 96, Subscription- Based Information Technology Arrangements (SBITAs), which establishes that a SBITA results in a right -to -use subscription asset- an intangible asset- and a corresponding subscription liability. GASB 96 will require governments to recognize a subscription liability for the amount owed on contracts offset by a capitalized asset. This standard will allow the reader of the government -wide financial statements a better view of the government's net position which is influenced by the underlying event and cash flows related to future fiscal periods. Additional information on long-term debt can be found in Note 5 of the financial statements. Defined Benefit Pension Plan and Section 115 Trust As of June 30, 2023, the City reported a liability of $13,550,553 for its proportionate share of the collective net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2022, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2021. Detailed information about the pension plan's fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CalPERS financial reports. As of June 30, 2023, the Section 115 Pension Trust had a balance of $5,317,487, additional information can be found in Note 12. The trust sets aside monies to fund the City's pension obligations. Contributions to the trust are irrevocable and assets are protected from creditors. The purpose of the trust is to address the City's pension obligations by accumulating assets to reduce the net pension liability. However, assets in the trust are recorded as restricted fund balance until they are transferred to the pension plan (CaIPERS). Additional information on the City's Pension Plan can be found in Note 9 and information on the Section 115 Trust can be found in Note 12. Other Post -Employment Benefit Plan (OPEB) In contrast to the Net Pension Liability, the OPEB Trust established to fund retiree health benefits, had a balance of $1,792,999 which decreases the OPEB liability of $1,415,511 and is reported as an asset balance of $377,488. Additional information on OPEB can be found in Note 11 of the financial statements. Major Capital Improvements The Capital Improvement Fund is primarily used to record the expenditures for capital projects. The fund had forty-seven (47) active Capital Improvement Projects during FY 2022/23. The five most active projects were: • Dune Palms Bridge Improvements ($4,050,000) • La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvements ($2,923,000) 228 Avenue 53 and Jefferson Roundabout ($2,758,000) Citywide Striping Refresh ($295,000) Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Improvements ($285,000) These projects, along with others, leveraged State or Federal grant funds or were significantly supported with Measure G sales tax revenues. Long-term Financial Sustainability The City ensures that its long-range goals are met through a variety of Boards and Commissions. Each is comprised of Council appointed residents, may include a City Council representative, and are supported by City staff. In addition, the City has adopted various financial policies and practices with the goal of sustaining a fiscally resilient government over the long-term, as well as increasing transparency and encouraging public engagement. The City has taken a proactive approach to rising pension and public safety costs by building its reserve categories and paying down the City's pension obligations. The City also continues to collaborate with Riverside County and other regional cities on police services to identify long-term savings. As of June 30, 2023, all four of the City's reserve categories (Cash Flow Reserve, Natural Disaster, Economic Disaster, and Capital Replacement) are fully funded to policy targets. The City has a mixture of housing and commercial developments under construction, and approved housing developments on the horizon. The Highway 111 Corridor Plan (Plan) continues to be a priority with daily traffic exceeding 40,000 vehicles, and accounting for nearly 80% of the City's annual sales tax revenue. The City Council has a history of implementing strategic measures to ensure the long-term fiscal sustainability of the City. These measures include adopting a structurally balanced budget, funding long-term needs, and maintaining robust reserve levels. As a result, the City has been able to maintain essential services despite economic fluctuations and is well -prepared to face future financial challenges. 229 ATTACHMENT 2 ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR 2022/2023 — UNRESTRICTED FUNDS SUMMARY The Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) is a set of financial statements for a state, municipality or other governmental entity that comply with the accounting requirements established by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). GASB is a private non -governmental organization, an arm of the Financial Accounting Foundation, that creates accounting reporting standards, or generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), for state and local governments in the United States, i.e. GASB sets the standards governing the content of an ACFR. The ACFR must be audited by an independent auditor using generally accepted government auditing standards. GASB Concepts Statement No. 34 requires the net assets of a government to be reported in three (3) categories: 1) invested in capital assets net of related debt, 2) restricted, and 3) unrestricted. As shown in the chart below, the City's Net Position (total assets and deferred outflows) is stated on page 5 of the Management Discussion and Analysis or MD&A of the fiscal year (FY) 2022/23 ACFR for La Quinta, and further described in detail on page 8. Net Position Summary FY 2022/23 Capital Assets $ 574,870,283 Restricted $ 62,283,620 Unrestricted $ 221,443,417 TOTAL NET POSITION $ 858,597,320 Per ACFR reporting guidelines, in particular GASB No. 34, the three (3) categories of a government's net assets are defined as follows: Capital Assets category reflects investments in capital assets (e.g., land, buildings; machinery, equipment), net of related debt, which the City uses to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. City capital assets totaling $574,870,283 or 67% of the city's total $858,597,320 Net Position (total assets and deferred outflows) include: • 129 miles of streets and 121 miles of sidewalks • 17 parks with amenities that include swimming pools, pickleball and tennis courts; X Park; soccer fields and softball/baseball diamonds; dog parks; playground equipment; and more. • 22 city -owned buildings 230 • 82.6 miles of bike paths • 4,800-plus street signs • 50 traffic light signals, 111 public safety cameras • 582 catch basins Restricted category is comprised of funds earmarked for a specific purpose; these restrictions are imposed on the City by an outside agency. Unrestricted category is defined as funds that can be used to meet ongoing obligations because they are not restricted by an outside agency. However, of note is that GASB reporting requirements for the ACFR do not take into account fund restrictions in accordance with the City's established policies. For purposes of ACFR reporting, the City's unrestricted net position is comprised of funds committed or assigned for certain reserves or projects, including assets that are in non - spendable form per the agency's established policies and procedures. For La Quinta some of the major restrictions to Unrestricted funds, as reported by FY 2022/23 ACFR are summarized below: • Non -Spendable: Land Held for Resale $5,403,652 • Non -Spendable: Due from Successor Agency $19,600,793 (Payable in annual installments through FY 2029130 from the Successor Agency's Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) enforceable obligations) • Restricted for Pension Trust (Section 115 Trust) $5,317,487 • Reserves — Committed • Reserves — Assigned • Internal Service Funds $45,000,000 $63,824,533 $24,699,097 (Equipment Replacement, Information Technology, Park Equipment and Facilities, and Insurance) Unassigned Fund Balance The Unassigned Fund Balance at approximately $36.1 million, as reported by the City's FY 2022/23 ACFR, are funds that have not been assigned to other Special Revenue Funds and that have not been restricted, committed, or assigned to specific purposes within the General Fund. The full detail of the $221,443,417 Unrestricted net cash position, as reported in the City's FY 2022/23 ACFR, is provided in the table below and demonstrates that the City does not have $221.4 million available to meet ongoing obligations due to internal restrictions and obligations: 231 FY 2022/23 ACFR Unrestricted Net Position Summary Governmental Activities- Unrestricted Net Position Nonspendable Prepaid Costs 126,461 Land held for resale 5,403,652 Due from Successor Agency 19,600,793 Restricted for Section 115 Trust 5,317,487 (:nmmittarl to Natural Disaster Reserve Economic Downturn Reserve Cash Flow Reserve Capital Replacement Reservie Carryovers Assigned for Public Safety Sales Tax Reserve Capital Projects Unassigned Internal Service Funds- Unrestricted Unavailable Revenues: Housing Authority & Non -Major Special Revenue Funds SUB -TOTAL $ Business -Type Activities: Unrestricted Net Position (SilverRock) UNRESTRICTED GRAND TOTAL $ 15,000,000 13,000,000 5,000,000 12,000,000 2,600,009 11,986,970 29,214,191 22,623,372 36,040,901 24,699,097 17,664,177 220,277,110 1,166,307 221,443,417 The City and City Council have an obligation to La Quinta's residents/taxpayers to spend/allocate funds responsibly — staying within budget to cover all cost obligations/expenditures to keep the City safe and to maintain City facilities, roads, sidewalks, and parks. The City Council and Staff remain conservative in spending taxpayers' dollars. Every year at budget time, surplus funds are put into reserve accounts — some with specific designated uses and others that are unassigned. These funds are available in case of emergencies, such as an earthquake or other natural disaster, or other type of emergency such as a pandemic or recession, and to help meet rising costs as we continue to keep pace with current inflation. It is vital for the City and for local governments to maintain adequate levels of fund balance to mitigate current and future risks such as revenue shortfalls and unanticipated expenditures. In previous years, it is our fiscally conservative approach that has helped us weather the storms caused by extraordinary events such as the great recession of 2008 and the global pandemic, as well as cyclical economic changes affecting our community. Staff and elected officials understand their fiduciary responsibility to ensure and maintain continuing trust from their citizens and members of the public and feel this document is representative of our efforts. 232 NET POSITION (UNRESTRICTED) CATEGORY DEFINITIONS As stated in Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Summary of Statement No. 34 — Basic Financial Statements- and Management's Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) for state and local governments, the definitions provided give a brief description on the categories that make up the unrestricted net position in both governmental activities and business -type activities. Governmental Activities Non -spendable includes amounts that cannot be spent on operating expenditures because they are either not in spendable form or are legally or contractually required to be maintained intact. This may include prepaid items, land held for resale, and amounts due from the Successor Agency to pay estimated installment payments of enforceable obligations until obligations of the Former Agency are paid in full and assets have been liquidated. Restricted includes amounts that are externally imposed by creditors, grantors, contributions, laws and regulations of other governments, or imposed by law. The Section 115 Trust is irrevocably dedicated to funding obligations of the City's pension beneficiaries, other post -employment beneficiaries or costs of administering the Trust. Committed includes amounts that can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal action of City's highest authority, the City Council. The formal action that is required to be taken to establish, modify, or rescind a fund balance commitment is by a resolution. This includes the City's four (4) defined reserve categories and carryovers for General Fund operational expenditures. Assigned includes amounts that are constrained by the City's intent to be used for specific purposes, but are neither restricted nor committed. City Council is authorized to assign amounts to a specific purpose pursuant to the policy -making powers granted through a resolution. This includes Public Safety which represents property tax accumulated and held in trust by the County of Riverside for fire protection, accumulated resources related to the City's sales tax Measure G, and capital projects which is comprised of carryover balances for capital projects. Unassigned includes the residual amounts that have not been restricted, committed, or assigned to specific purposes. The General Fund is the only fund that reports a positive unassigned fund balance. The unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. Internal Service Funds are used to allocate costs among the City's various functions. The City has four (4) internal service funds: Equipment Replacement, Information Technology, Park Equipment and Facilities, and Insurance. Unavailable Revenues represents when an asset is recorded but the revenue is not yet available, such as a deferred inflow. These deferred resources are reported as 233 unavailable until such time as the revenue becomes available. The unrestricted net position is the remaining portion of net position that is not externally restricted. Business -Type Activities represents the City's enterprise fund to account for the SilverRock Golf Course operations, which is considered a major fund. 234 ATTACHMENT 3 C IT Y OF LA QUINTA ANNUAL COMPREHENSIVE FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 307 2023 01 Prepared by: Finance Department 236 City of La Quinta, California Annual Comprehensive Financial Report Year Ended June 30, 2023 Prepared By: Finance Department 237 238 City of La Quinta, California Table of Contents June 30, 2023 INTRODUCTORY SECTION Letterof Transmittal................................................................................................................................................i Listof Principal Officers........................................................................................................................................vii OrganizationalChart............................................................................................................................................viii Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting(GFOA)............................................................ ix FINANCIAL SECTION IndependentAuditor's Report.................................................................................................................................. 1 Management's Discussion and Analysis.................................................................................................................... 5 Government Wide Financial Statements Statementof Net Position................................................................................................................................... 16 Statementof Activities........................................................................................................................................ 18 Government Fund Financial Statements Balance Sheet —Governmental Funds................................................................................................................. 20 Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position ............................ 22 Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances — Governmental Funds ........................ 23 Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds to the Statement of Activities........................................................................................... 24 Proprietary Fund Financial Statements Statement of Net Position — Proprietary Funds.................................................................................................. 25 Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position — Proprietary Funds ............................. 26 Statement of Cash Flows — Proprietary Funds.................................................................................................... 27 Fiduciary Fund Financial Statements Statement of Fiduciary Net Position................................................................................................................... 29 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position................................................................................................. 30 Notes to Financial Statements................................................................................................................................ 31 REQUIRED SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION Budgetary Comparison Schedule — General Fund............................................................................................... 73 Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Housing Authority....................................................................................... 75 Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Disaster Recovery........................................................................................ 76 Schedule of Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability — Miscellaneous Plan ......................................... 77 Schedule of Pension Plan Contributions — Miscellaneous Plan........................................................................... 78 Schedule of Changes in the Net OPEB Liability/(Asset) and Related Ratios........................................................ 79 Schedule of OPEB Contributions......................................................................................................................... 80 Note to Required Supplementary Information................................................................................................... 81 239 City of La Quinta, California Table of Contents June 30, 2023 COMBINING AND INDIVIDUAL FUND STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Governmental Funds............................................................................. 84 Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances — Nonmajor Governmental Funds.......................................................................................................................... 90 Budgetary Comparison Schedules — Special Revenue Funds StateGas Tax....................................................................................................................................................... 96 Libraryand Museum............................................................................................................................................ 97 FederalAssistance............................................................................................................................................... 98 SLESA................................................................................................................................................................... 99 Lightingand Landscaping.................................................................................................................................. 100 Quimby.............................................................................................................................................................. 101 LaQuinta Public Safety Officer.......................................................................................................................... 102 Artin Public Places............................................................................................................................................ 103 SouthCoast Air Quality...................................................................................................................................... 104 AB939................................................................................................................................................................ 105 HousingGrants.................................................................................................................................................. 106 LawEnforcement............................................................................................................................................... 107 MeasureA......................................................................................................................................................... 108 EconomicDevelopment.................................................................................................................................... 109 AB1379.............................................................................................................................................................. 110 Budgetary Comparison Schedules — Capital Projects Funds CapitalImprovement...................................................................................................... Maintenance Facilities DIF Fund.................................................................................... Infrastructure................................................................................................................. CivicCenter..................................................................................................................... Transportation................................................................................................................ Parks and Recreation...................................................................................................... LibraryDevelopment...................................................................................................... CommunityCenter......................................................................................................... StreetFacility.................................................................................................................. ParkFacility..................................................................................................................... FireFacility...................................................................................................................... Budgetary Comparison Schedules — Debt Service Funds FinancingAuthority........................................................................................................ Internal Service Funds Combining Statement of Net Position............................................................................ Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position........ Combining Statement of Cash Flows.............................................................................. ................................. 111 ................................. 112 ................................. 113 ................................. 114 ................................. 115 ................................. 116 ................................. 117 ................................. 118 ................................. 119 ................................. 120 ................................. 121 ............. 122 ................ 124 ................ 125 ................ 126 240 City of La Quinta, California Table of Contents June 30, 2023 STATISTICAL SECTION Net Position by Component (Table 1)............................................................................................................... 128 Changes in Net Position (Table 2)...................................................................................................................... 130 Changes in Net Position — Governmental Activities (Table 3)........................................................................... 132 Changes in Net Position — Business -type Activities (Table 4)............................................................................ 134 Fund Balances of Governmental Funds (Table 5).............................................................................................. 136 Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds (Table 6)........................................................................... 138 Tax Revenue by Source (Table 7)....................................................................................................................... 140 Top 25 Bradley -Burns Sales Tax Producers (Table 8)........................................................................................ 141 Top 25 Measure G Sales Tax Producers (Table 9)............................................................................................. 142 Taxable Sales by Category (Table 10)................................................................................................................ 143 Assessed Value of Taxable Property (Table 11)................................................................................................. 145 Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates (Table 12)..................................................................................... 146 Principal Property Taxpayers (Table 13)............................................................................................................ 147 Property Tax Levies and Collections (Table 14)................................................................................................. 148 Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type (Table 15)................................................................................................. 149 Ratio of General Bonded Debt Outstanding (Table 16)..................................................................................... 151 Direct and Overlapping Debt (Table 17)............................................................................................................ 152 Legal Debt Margin Information (Table 18)........................................................................................................ 153 Pledged -Revenue Coverage (Table 19)............................................................................................................. 155 Demographic and Economic Statistics (Table 20)............................................................................................. 156 Principal Employers (Table 21).......................................................................................................................... 157 Full-time City Employees by Function (Table 22).............................................................................................. 158 Operating Indicators by Function (Table 23)..................................................................................................... 159 Capital Asset Statistics by Function (Table 24).................................................................................................. 160 Schedule of Insurance in Force (Table 25)........................................................................................................ 161 Other Information ProjectStatus.................................................................................................................................................... 162 241 This page intentionally left blank. 242 ta Qwkra CALIFORNIA - July 19, 2024 To the Citizens of La Quinta, and the Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: It is with great pleasure that we present to you the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) of the City of La Quinta for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. The ACFR has been prepared by the Finance Department for the benefit of City Council members, citizens, investors, grantors, employees, and others who may have an interest in the financial well-being of the City. The ACFR presents information regarding the City's financial activities. This transmittal letter provides a non -technical summary of the City's finances, services, achievements, and economic outlook. A more detailed analysis is presented in the Management's Discussion and Analysis section (MD&A) that immediately follows the independent auditor's report. The MD&A provides an overview and analysis of the basic financial statements and complements this transmittal. Responsibility for both the accuracy and the completeness of all disclosures rests with the City of La Quinta. To the best of our knowledge and belief, the enclosed data is accurate in all material respects and is reported in a manner designed to fairly present the financial position and results of City operations. Supplementary disclosures are included to summarize the City's financial activities. This ACFR was prepared in conformance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). The City's financial reporting is based upon all Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statements; these pronouncements are the most authoritative source for governmental GAAP. The City is responsible for ensuring an adequate internal control structure is in place. The internal control structure is subject to constant evaluation by the management of the City and annual review by independent auditors. Reviews determine the adequacy of the internal control structure, as well as to determine if the City complied with applicable laws and regulations. In reviewing internal control structures, the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits to be derived, hence the objective is to provide reasonable, rather than absolute assurance, that the financial statements are free of any material misstatements. Eide Bailly LLP, Certified Public Accountants, has issued an unmodified ("clean") opinion on the City's financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2023. This is the most favorable conclusion. The independent auditor's report is located at the front of the ta Qwkra CALIFORNIA - financial section. The independent audit involved examining evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation and conformity with GAAP. Government Profile The City of La Quinta is located 120 miles east of Los Angeles in the eastern portion of Riverside County known as the Coachella Valley. The City has a permanent population of approximately 38,000, within a boundary of 36 square miles. Each year nearly 18,000 seasonal residents also call La Quinta home from October through May. A natural paradise in the Coachella Valley, the City is nestled between the Santa Rosa and San Bernardino Mountains, is an integral part of the Coachella Valley's world-renowned resort and retirement area, and is known for its championship golf, festivals and community events, health and wellness, stunning views and spectacular trails. The City was incorporated in 1982 as a general law City and became a charter city in November 1996. It is governed by a five -member City Council under the Council/Manager form of government. The Mayor is directly elected, serves a two-year term, and represents the City at many public functions; the four Council Members serve four-year terms, with two Council Members elected every two years. The Mayor and Council Members are elected at large and also serve as the Board of Directors of the Housing and Finance Authorities. The Council appoints the City Manager, who in turn appoints the Directors of the various departments except for the City Attorney who is appointed by the Council. The Finance Director also serves as the City/Housing Authority Treasurer and the City Manager is also the Executive Director of the Housing Authority. The City provides a range of services, which include street and infrastructure construction and maintenance; community development and planning; affordable housing programs; code compliance; recreational and cultural activities; and operations management. The City contracts with other government agencies and private entities for specific services, including police and fire protection, library and museum services, water and sewer service, electricity service, public transit, refuse collection, and street sweeping. W �W LAl I14]RXI:% The City's annual operating and capital improvement budgets are adopted by resolutions for the fiscal year that begins July 1st. Separate resolutions are adopted by the City Council and Board of Directors of the Housing and Finance Authorities. The annual budget is the foundation for the City's financial planning and control. The budget is prepared by fund, function, department, and line item. Department Directors may transfer line -item resources within a division with the approval of the City Manager. The City Manager may authorize transfers between divisions and departments. Local Economy According to the State of California Employment Development Department, as of October 2023, the unadjusted unemployment rate for La Quinta was 5.5%, which was slightly higher than unadjusted rates for Riverside County's at 5.4% and the statewide average of 5.0%. Current unemployment rates are greatly impacted by the continuing gains in jobs in the Leisure & Hospitality and Private Education and Health Services sectors. The City's dominant industries are tourism, recreation, and retail, with the following being major employers: Desert Sands Unified School District, PGA West and Citrus Club, La Quinta Resort and Club, Costco, and Wal-Mart Super Center. Throughout the year La Quinta hosts a variety of multi -generational open-air events and shines in the national spotlight as the only PGA golf tour event in the region with the American Express Golf Tournament, which includes two nights of outdoor concerts. The City also co -hosts Ironman 70.3 Indian Wells La Quinta, which brings over 3,000 athletes and supporters from all over the world to the Coachella Valley. The City's cultural diversity, values, unique characteristics and attributes are commemorated through artists who showcase their high -quality artwork at the fine art event, La Quinta Art Celebration, which is now held twice a year and is ranked number one in the United States by Art Fair Sourcebook's Top 100 Fine Art Events. Substantially or entirely completed projects during 2022/23 included Longhorn Steakhouse, Welbe Health, a new Panera drive-thru, and WDC Kitchen & Bath along the Highway 111 Corridor, and Rd Rnnr Restaurant in Old Town La Quinta. ta Qwkra CALIFORNIA - Lona-term Financial Plannin Sound financial governance and prudent planning continues to be management's focus. The City has a long history of providing superior service, life enrichment opportunities, and a quality environment to its residents, businesses, and visitors. La Quinta has taken a proactive approach to rising pension and public safety costs by building its reserve categories and paying down the City's pension obligations. The City also continues to collaborate with Riverside County and other regional cities on police services to identify long-term savings. The City ensures that its long-range goals are met through a variety of Boards and Commissions. Each is comprised of Council -appointed residents, may include a City Council representative, and are supported by City staff. In addition, the City has adopted various financial policies and practices with the goal of sustaining a fiscally resilient government over the long-term, assuring fiscal sustainability, as well as increasing transparency and encouraging public engagement. In 2022/23, the General Fund's overall fund balance increased by almost $20.1 million when compared to the ending balance in 2021/22, mainly due to revenue increases surpassing budget projections in areas such as transient occupancy taxes and sales tax. As of June 30, 2023, all four of the City's reserve categories (Cash Flow Reserve, Natural Disaster, Economic Disaster, and Capital Replacement) are fully funded to policy targets. In June 2023 the City Council adopted a balanced budget without the use of reserves for fiscal year 2023/24. The adopted budget had operating revenues exceeding expenses by $1,649,350. The 2023/24 budget included sustained funding for essential services, such as police, fire, and maintenance of critical infrastructure. La Quinta has cultivated a sound foundation of General Fund revenues including sales tax, transient occupancy tax, and property tax. The City was incorporated in 1982 after Proposition 13 was approved (the landmark property tax reform initiative enacted in 1978); as such, the City receives a smaller share of property tax revenue but has also secured additional property tax revenue from the County for fire and library services. IVA W �W LAl 11:0KNI:% The Future The City has a mixture of housing and commercial developments under construction. Larger residential developments underway include Jefferson Street Apartments, Solterra, Point Happy Homes, Barcelona Club Apartments (formerly Desert Club Apartments), Cantera at Coral Mountain, and Palo Verde and commercial developments include luxury Montage and lifestyle Pendry hotels, Hampton Inn, and Dune Palms mixed -use project. Approved housing developments on the horizon include La Quinta Village Apartments, Sierra Blanca, and Club at Coral Mountain. The Highway 111 Corridor Plan (Plan) continues to be a priority with daily traffic exceeding 40,000 vehicles, and accounting for nearly 80% of the City's annual sales tax revenue. The two mile -long, 400-acre regional commercial hub at the center of the City, is being evaluated to create a more connected and walkable environment through the implementation of form -based code (FBC). FBC is anticipated to reshape the corridor by adding mixed -use and infill development and incorporating ever -evolving shopping trends. The City recently acquired vacant property on the north side of Highway 111, which is anticipated to be developed as a mixed -use project with commercial and residential components furthering the City's goals of fostering mixed -use development, affordable housing, multi -modal transportation, and the development of the Highway 111 corridor. Awards and Acknowledgements The Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the City for its ACFR for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2022. This was the twenty-sixth consecutive year that the City received this prestigious award. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, the City must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized ACFR. This report must satisfy both generally accepted accounting principles and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for one year. We believe that our current ACFR continues to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate. We would like to express our appreciation to the City Council and the Financial Advisory Commission for their ongoing oversight of the financial affairs of the City and their prudent fiscal, economic, and land use policy and direction. We also thank City staff with ►TA W �W LAl I14]RXI:% special appreciation to the Finance Department for their continued effort to provide accurate financial data and the preparation of this report. Respectfully Submitted, CQ k Jon McMillen, City Manager Claudia Martinez, Finance Director 191 City of La Quinta List of Principal Officers June 30, 2023 CITY COUNCIL Linda Evans, Mayor Steve Sanchez, Mayor Pro Tern Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Council Member Deborah McGarrey Council Member John Pena, Council Member ADMINISTRATION Jon McMillen, City Manager Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/ City Treasurer Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/ City Engineer Gilbert Villalpando, Business Unit/Housing Development Director Monika Radeva, City Clerk William H. Ihrke, City Attorney vii 249 t(V Qai�trcv CALIFORNIA CITY OF LA 0UINTA LA OUJ NTACALIFORNIA ORGANIZATIONAL CHART For listing of staffing by department and total number of employees, see Statistical Section - Full Time City Employees by Function. viii 250 Government Fillance officers Association Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting Presented to City of La Quinta California For its Annual Comprehensive Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2022 Executive Director/CEO ix 251 This page intentionally left blank. 252 EideBailly. CPAs & BUSINESS ADVISORS Independent Auditor's Report To the Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City of La Quinta, California Report on the Audit of the Financial Statements Opinions We have audited the financial statements of the governmental activities, business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City of La Quinta, California (City), as of and for the year ended June 30, 2023, and the related notes to the financial statements, which collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements as listed in the table of contents. In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the respective financial position of the governmental activities, the business -type activities, each major fund, and the aggregate remaining fund information of the City, as of June 30, 2023, and the respective changes in financial position, and, where applicable, cash flows thereof for the year then ended in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Basis for Opinions We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAS) and the standards applicable to financial audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States (Government Auditing Standards). Our responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements section of our report. We are required to be independent of the City and to meet our other ethical responsibilities, in accordance with the relevant ethical requirements relating to our audit. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinions. Adoption of New Accounting Standard As discussed in Note 1 and 18 to the financial statements, the City has adopted the provisions of Government Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 96, Subscription -Based Information Technology Arrangements (SBITAs), for the year ended June 30, 2023. Accordingly, a restatement has been made to the governmental activities net position as of July 1, 2022, to restate beginning net position. Our opinions are not modified with respect to this matter. What inspires you, inspires us. , eidebailly.com 253 10681 Foothill Blvd., Ste. 300 Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730-3831 1 T 909.466.4410 I F 909.466.4431 EOE Correction of Error As discussed in Note 18 to the financial statements, certain errors resulting in a misstatement of amounts previously reported for Governmental Activities Capital Assets, activities of the Housing Authority, and activities of the Private -Purpose Trust Fund Successor Agency of the former RDA as of June 30, 2022, were discovered during the current year. Accordingly, a restatement has been made to the Governmental Activities, the Housing Authority and the Private -Purpose Trust Fund Successor Agency of the former RDA net position/fund balance as of June 30, 2022, to correct the error. Our opinions are not modified with respect to this matter. Responsibilities of Management for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; and for the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, management is required to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City's ability to continue as a going concern for twelve months beyond the financial statement date, including any currently known information that may raise substantial doubt shortly thereafter. Auditor's Responsibilities for the Audit of the Financial Statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinions. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not absolute assurance and therefore is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. Misstatements are considered material if there is a substantial likelihood that, individually or in the aggregate, they would influence the judgment made by a reasonable user based on the financial statements. In performing an audit in accordance with GAAS and Government Auditing Standards, we: • Exercise professional judgment and maintain professional skepticism throughout the audit. • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, and design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks. Such procedures include examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control. Accordingly, no such opinion is expressed. 254 Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluate the overall presentation of the financial statements. Conclude whether, in our judgment, there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the City's ability to continue as a going concern for a reasonable period of time. We are required to communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit, significant audit findings, and certain internal control —related matters that we identified during the audit. Required Supplementary Information Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America require that the management's discussion and analysis, schedule of the City's proportionate share of the net pension liability, schedule of pension plan contributions, schedule of changes in the net OPEB liability/(asset) and related ratios, schedule of OPEB contributions, and the budgetary comparison schedules for the General Fund, Housing Authority and Disaster Recover special revenue funds and the related notes, as listed on the table of contents, be presented to supplement the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and, although not a part of the basic financial statements, is required by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board who considers it to be an essential part of financial reporting for placing the basic financial statements in an appropriate operational, economic, or historical context. We have applied certain limited procedures to the required supplementary information in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which consisted of inquiries of management about the methods of preparing the information and comparing the information for consistency with management's responses to our inquiries, the basic financial statements, and other knowledge we obtained during our audit of the basic financial statements. We do not express an opinion or provide any assurance on the information because the limited procedures do not provide us with sufficient evidence to express an opinion or provide any assurance. Supplementary Information Our audit was conducted for the purpose of forming opinions on the financial statements that collectively comprise the City's basic financial statements. The combining and individual fund statements and schedules are presented for purposes of additional analysis and are not a required part of the basic financial statements. Such information is the responsibility of management and was derived from and relates directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements. The information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial statements and certain additional procedures, including comparing and reconciling such information directly to the underlying accounting and other records used to prepare the basic financial statements or to the basic financial statements themselves, and other additional procedures in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. In our opinion, the combining and individual fund statements and schedules are fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the basic financial statements as a whole. 255 Other Information Management is responsible for the other information included in the annual report. The other information comprises the introductory, the statistical sections and the Project Status: Highway 111 Bridge Funding but does not include the basic financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. Our opinions on the basic financial statements do not cover the other information, and we do not express an opinion or any form of assurance thereon. In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and consider whether a material inconsistency exists between the other information and the basic financial statements, or the other information otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work performed, we conclude that an uncorrected material misstatement of the other information exists, we are required to describe it in our report. Other Reporting Required by Government Auditing Standards In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated July 19, 2024, on our consideration of the City's internal control over financial reporting and on our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is solely to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the effectiveness of the City's internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards in considering the City's internal control over financial reporting and compliance. Rancho Cucamonga, California July 19, 2024 256 4 MANAGEMENT DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (UNAUDITED) This narrative provides an overview and analysis of the City of La Quinta's (City) financial activities for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023. The City Executive Team encourages readers to consider this information in conjunction with the data provided in our transmittal letter, which is in an earlier section of this report. All amounts, unless otherwise indicated, are rounded to the nearest thousand dollars and dates are represented by fiscal year. W4 W, rF•y •f �. Jiro OF _ ° 17 �•�rt, LAB v_�a. ! .� At the close of 2022/23 (June 30, 2023): • The total assets and deferred outflows of the City exceeded its total liabilities and deferred inflows at the close of the fiscal year 2022/23 by $858,597,000 (net position). Of this amount, $221,443,000 (unrestricted net position) may be used to meet ongoing obligations and approximately $574,870,000 or 67% was invested in capital assets and is not available to meet ongoing obligations. • Governmental activities total net position increased by $35,135,000 and the Business -Type total net position decreased by $120,000 which is attributable to the SilverRock Golf Course. • Governmental funds (General Fund, Housing Authority, Disaster Recovery Fund, Capital Improvement Fund, sixteen (16) non -major special revenue funds, ten (10) non -major capital projects funds, and one (1) non -major debt service fund) had a combined ending fund balance of $239,820,000, an increase of $19,852,000. The primary reasons for this increase can be attributed to taxes exceeding the original budget projections coupled with expenditure savings and a positive fair market value adjustment to the overall investment portfolio. • The unassigned General Fund balance comprised $44,105,000, or 24%, of the total $185,978,000 balance and represented 39% of total final General Fund budgeted expenses including transfers and multi -year capital projects. • Total governmental activities debt decreased by $254,000 from $1,957,000 to $1,703,000. Government -Wide Financial Statements The government -wide financial statements provide a broad overview of the City's finances. There are two statements — statement of net position and statement of activities, as described below. The statement of net position presents information on all City assets and deferred outflows of resources as well as liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources, with the difference between the two reported as net position. Over time, increases or decreases in net position may serve as a useful indicator of whether the City's financial position is improving or deteriorating. The statement of activities presents information showing how the government's net position changed during the most recent fiscal year. All changes in net position are reported as soon as the underlying event occurs giving rise to the change, regardless of the timing of related cash flows. Thus, revenues and expenses are reported in this statement for some items that will only result in cash flows in future fiscal periods, for example, earned but unused vacation leave. Both of these government -wide financial statements distinguish City functions, which are principally supported by taxes, fees, and intergovernmental revenues (governmental activities) from other functions that are intended to recover all or 258 a significant portion of their costs through user charges (business -type activities). Governmental activities include general government, public safety, community services, planning and development and public works; business -type activities include the SilverRock Golf course operations. The government -wide financial statements include not only the City of La Quinta (known as the primary government), but also the La Quinta Financing Authority and the La Quinta Housing Authority. Although legally separate entities, they function for all practical purposes as City departments. The government -wide financial statements are listed in the table of contents under the Financial Section of this report. Fund Financial Statements A fund is a grouping of related accounts and is used to maintain control over resources that have been segregated for specific activities or objectives. The City, like other state and local governments, uses fund accounting to ensure compliance with finance -related legal requirements. All City's funds are aggregated into three categories: governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds. Governmental Funds Governmental funds are used to account for essentially the same functions reported as governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. However, unlike the government -wide financial statements, governmental fund financial statements focus on near -term inflows and outflows of spendable resources, as well as on balances of spendable resources available at the end of the fiscal year. Such information may be useful in evaluating a government's near -term financing requirements. Because the focus is narrower than the government -wide financial statements, it is useful to compare this information with similar information presented for governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. By doing so, readers may better understand the long-term impact of the government's near - term financing decisions. Both the governmental fund balance sheet and the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances provide a reconciliation to facilitate this comparison between governmental funds and governmental activities. The City maintains thirty-one (31) individual governmental funds, which are distinguished between major and non -major funds. Information is presented separately in the governmental fund balance sheet and in the governmental fund statement of revenues, expenditures, and changes in fund balances. There are four (4) major governmental funds: the General Fund, the Housing Authority special revenue fund, the Disaster Recovery special revenue fund, and the Capital Improvement capital project fund. Data from the other twenty-seven (27) governmental funds are combined into a single, aggregate presentation. Individual fund data for each of these non -major governmental funds is provided in the form of combining statements in the Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules section of the report. 0 259 The City adopts an annual budget for its General Fund. A budgetary comparison schedule has been provided to demonstrate compliance with the adopted budget. The basic governmental fund financial statements can be found in the table of contents under the heading Basic Financial Statements. Proprietary Funds Proprietary funds are broken down into enterprise and internal service funds. Enterprise funds are used to report the same functions presented as business -type activities in the government -wide financial statements. The City maintains one (1) enterprise fund to account for the SilverRock Golf Course operations, which is considered a major fund. Internal service funds are used to allocate costs among the City's various functions. The City has four (4) internal service funds: Equipment Replacement, Information Technology, Park Equipment and Facilities, and Insurance. Because these four (4) services predominantly benefit governmental rather than business - type functions, they have been included within governmental activities in the government -wide financial statements. The internal service funds are combined into a single, aggregated presentation in the proprietary fund financial statements. Individual fund data for the internal service funds is provided in the form of combining statements on the Combining and Individual Fund Statements and Schedules section of the report. The basic proprietary fund financial statements are listed in the table of contents under Proprietary Funds: Statement of Net Position, Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position, and Statement of Cash Flows. Fiduciary Funds Fiduciary funds are used to account for resources held for the benefit of parties outside the government. Fiduciary funds are not reflected in the government -wide financial statements because the resources of those funds are not available to support the City's own programs. The accounting used for fiduciary funds is much like that used for proprietary funds. The City reports on two fiduciary funds: 1) the Supplemental Pension Trust fund which accounts for the Defined Contribution Pension Trust established to provide supplemental retirement benefits for employees, and (2) Successor Agency of the Former RDA Private -Purpose Trust Fund which provides for activities associated with the dissolution of the former Redevelopment Agency. The basic fiduciary fund financial statements are listed in the table of contents under Fiduciary Funds: Statement of Net Position — Fiduciary Funds and Changes in Net Position — Fiduciary Funds. Notes to the Financial Statements The notes to the financial statements provide information that is essential to obtain a full understanding of the data provided in the government -wide and fund financial statements. These notes are listed in the table of contents under Notes to Financial Statements. 260 Other Information In addition to the financial statements and accompanying notes, this report also presents the combining statements referred to earlier in connection with non -major governmental funds, internal service funds, and agency funds. The non -major governmental funds' combining statements are presented immediately following the Required Supplementary Information while the combined statements for the internal service funds and agency funds are presented following the budgetary comparison schedules for the debt service funds. As noted earlier, net position may serve over time as a useful indicator of a government's financial position. The City's net position, the difference between assets and liabilities and deferred inflows/outflows, is one way to measure the City's financial health or financial position. Over time, increases or decreases in the City's net position indicate whether its financial health is improving or deteriorating. The City's net position increased from $823,582,00 to $858,597,000 at the close of the 2022/23, which is $35,015,000 more than the previous year. Increases were reflected in restricted and unrestricted net position for governmental activities. The largest portion of the City's Net Position ($560,189,000 or 68% for 2021/22 and $574,870,000 or 67% for 2022/23) reflects investment in capital assets (e.g., land, buildings; machinery, and equipment), net of related debt. The City uses these capital assets to provide services to citizens; consequently, these assets are not available for future spending. City of La Quinta Net Position Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Total by Fiscal Year 2022 % 2022 % 2022 As Restated 2023 Change As Restated 2023 Change As Restated 2023 Change Current and other assets $ 281,978,427 $ 309,087,961 10% $ 1,432,615 $ 1,546,130 8% $ 283.411.042 $ 310.634.091 10% Ca ital assets 517,859,684 533,177,093 3% 43,057,599 42,558,046 -1% 560,917,283 575,735,139 3% Total Assets 799,838,111 842,265,054 5% 44,490,214 44,104,176 -1 % 844,328,325 886,369,230 5% Deferred outflows of resources 6,456,532 19,619,118 204% 0% 6,456.532 19.619.118 204% _ 0% Current liabilities 25,399,471 26,214,135 3% 395,781 379,823 -4% 25,795.252 26.593.958 3% Non -current liabilities 8,838,729 15,253,979 73% 565,837 315,520 0% 9,404.566 15.569.499 66% Total Liabilities 34,238,200 41,468,114 21 % 961,618 695,343 -28% 35,199,818 42,163,457 20% Deferred inflows of resources 9,328,726 5,227,571 -44% 0% 9,328,726 5.227.571 -440/ Net Position: Net investment in capital assets 517,697,036 532,627,757 3% 42,491,762 42,242,526 -1% 560.188.798 574.870.283 3% Prior Period Adjustment (Net) 17,325,415 - -100 % - - 0% - - 0% Restricted 54,412,358 62,283,620 140/ - - 0% 54,412.358 62.283.620 14% Unrestricted 190,618,323 220,277,110 16% 1,036,834 1,166,307 12% 191,655.157 221.443.417 16% Total Net Position $ 780,053,132 $ 815,188,487 5% is 43,528,596 $ 43,408,833 0% $ 823,581,728 $ 858,597,320 4% An additional portion of the City's net position ($62,284,000 or 7% in 2023 and $54,412,000 or 7% in 2022) represents resources that are subject to external restrictions on how they may be used. The remaining balance of unrestricted net position $221,443,000 (26%) may be used to meet the government's ongoing obligations to citizens and creditors. At the end of 2022/23, the City had positive balances in all three categories of net position for the governmental and business -type activities. M 261 Governmental Activities Governmental activities net position increased by $35,135,000 accounting for a positive 5% percent change in the net position from the previous year. Key elements of these changes are as follows: City of La Quinta Changes in Net Position Governmental Activities Business -Type Activities Total by Fiscal Year 2022 As Restated 2023 Change 2022 As Restated 2023 Change 2022 As Restated 2023 Change PROGRAM REVENUES: Charges for Services $ 6,663,365 $ 6,551,700 $ (331,685) $ 4,679,163 $ 4,167,458 $ 66,295 $ 11,562,546 $ 11,319,158 $ (243,390) Operating Grants antl Contributions 5,786,773 7,136,356 1,349,565 - - - 5,766,]]3 7,136,356 1,349,565 CaP" Grants antl Contributions 11,952,031 8,760,766 (3,191,243) - - - 11,952,031 8,]60,]88 (3,191,243) GENERAL REVENUES & TRANSFERS - Property Taxes 17,623,658 20,697,061 2,813,223 - - - 1],823:111 10, 69],081 2, 173:113 Other Taxes 50,610,128 51,942,858 1,332,730 - - - 50,610,128 51,942, 858 1,332,]30 Investment In- 111:164 5, 058,J1] 4,839,553 4, 329 12,456 8, 12] 223,493 5,0]1, 1]3 4,17,610 Net Change in Fair Value of Investnents (S,J2J,183) (1,519, 171) 4,208,012 (45,2]9J 20, 665 65,944 (5,]]2,462J (1,491 506) 4,173, 91 Motor Vehicle In Lieu 4,663,32] 5,110,569 447,242 - - - 4,663, 32] 5, 110, 569 44], 242 Ms-1Wneous 943 160 1 432 619 489 459 943,160 1,432,619 489 459 4,638,213 4,800,579 162,366 97,792,856 309,9]2,098 12, 179,242 TOTAL REVENUES 93,154,643 305, 171,519 12,016,876 EXPENSES: General Gov ,-nt 9,733,224 17,213,246 7,480,024 - - - 9,733,224 17,213,246 7,480,024 Public Safety 25,141,782 25,457,350 (284,432) - - - 25,141,112 21,417,310 (284,432) Planning & Development 4,716,745 3,146,264 (1,570,481) - - - 4,J 16,]45 3, 146, 264 (1,SJ0:411, Community Services 6,439,863 9,550, 001 1,110, 138 - - - 6,439, 863 9,550, 001 1, 110, 138 Public Works 14,985,480 14, 043, 19] (941,683J - - - 14,985,480 14,043,797 (941,663) Interest on Lang -Term Debt 11,914 25,504 13,590 - - - 11, 914 11,504 13,590 Golf Course 4 74628 5 520 342 774,061 4,746 281 5 520 342 774 061 4,]46,281 5,520, 342 ]]4,061 68,375,289 74,956,506 6,581,217 TOTAL EXPENSES 63,629,008 69,436,164 5,807,156 Excess or Deficiency before Transfers & (108,068) (719,763) (611,695) 29,417,567 35,015,592 5,598,025 Ex[raortlinary Items 29,525,635 35,735,355 6,209,720 TRANSFERS & EXTRAORDINARY ITEMS: Extraordinary Gain on Dissolution of RDA 609,515 - (609,515) - - - 609,515 - (609,515) Transfers 550 000 (600,000) 50 000 "0 000 600 000 50,000 441,932 (119,763) (561,695) 30,02J,012 31,011,112 4,988,510 Increase in Net Position 29,585,150 35,135,355 5,550,205 Prior Period Adjus[ment (Net) 17,325,415 - (17,325,415) - - - 1J,325,415 - (1], 325,415) Net Position -Beginning 733 154256] 823 581 ]28 47,352,497 4286 509 483 0 19 38 88259]3203 35,015,592 INETPOSION-ENDNG ]80 03 132 815 848] 35 135 Governmental revenues overall increased by $12,017,000 with the largest increases being $4,840,000 in investment income, followed by $4,208,000 for fair value of investments and $2,873,000 in property taxes. Expenses for Governmental Activities increased by $5,807,000 (an 8% increase when compared to 2021 /22). The $7,480,000 increase in General Government reflects the additional discretionary payment made for the City's unfunded pension obligation in 2022/23. A decrease in Planning & Development totaling $1,570,000 was the result of reduced programs such as the Small Business relief programs offered during the pandemic. As noted earlier Governmental Activities include 31 individual governmental funds and include capital asset activity allocated on a percentage basis by department. Additional information on capital asset activity distribution can be found in Note 4. • The General Fund contributed $600,000 to the business -type activities of the golf course. Funds were utilized to support operations per the adjusted budget. Business -Type Activities This was the eighteenth full year of operations for the SilverRock Golf Resort since the golf course opened in 2005. Charges for services primarily consisted of green fees which totaled $4,767,000, $88,000 higher than the previous year, with golf course expenses of $5,520,000, which were $774,000 or approximately 16% more than the previous year. 262 In 2022/23, the General Fund transferred $600,000 to the SilverRock Golf Fund to support operations. After this transfer, the net position decreased by $120,000. As noted earlier, the City uses fund accounting to ensure and demonstrate compliance with finance -related legal requirements. Governmental Funds The focus of the City's governmental funds is to provide information on near -term inflows, outflows, and balances. Such information is useful in assessing the City's financing requirements. In particular, unassigned fund balance may serve as a useful measure of a government's net resources available for spending at the end of the fiscal year. As of the end of 2022/23, the City's governmental funds reported combined ending fund balances as follows: City of La Quinta Governmental Fund Balances Category General Fund Percent All Other Funds Percent Total Funds Percent Nonspendable $ 25,130,438 14% $ 468 0.001 % $ 25,130,906 10% Restricted 5,317,487 3% 61,906,132 115% 67,223,619 28% Committed 47,600,009 26% - 0% 47,600,009 20% Assigned 63,824,533 34% - 0% 63,824,533 27% Unassigned 44,105,041 24% 8,064,140 -15% 36,040,901 15% $ 185,977,508 100% $ 53,842,460 100% $ 239,819,968 100% TOTAL Governmental fund balances ended the year totaling $239,820,000, an increase of $19,852,000 in comparison with the prior years' ending balance of $219,968,000. These collective fund balances include the General Fund, Housing Authority, Financing Authority, Capital Improvement Fund, and various Special Revenue funds. Nonspendable Nonspendable fund balance totaled $25,131,000 or 10%; this represents amounts that are not available to pay for operating expenditures because they are in the form of land and receivables. Restricted Restricted fund balance totaled $67,224,000 or 28%; these amounts represent funds with external limitations on spending. Significant restrictions include: Section 115 trust of $5,317,000 restricted for pension liabilities; Library and Museum totaling $11,547,000 which represents property tax increment money that can only be used for library and museum services; Measure A funding of $4,114,000 which can only be used for transportation; Transportation capital project fund of $5,518,000 in developer fees that are restricted for the acquisition, construction and improvement of the City's infrastructure; and Economic Development funding of $3,283,000 that can only be used for future economic development in the City. 10 263 Committed $47,600,000 (20%) are committed fund balances which are the result of self-imposed limitations established by the City Council. The City adopted a Reserve Policy in May 2018 which established General Fund committed reserve categories including Natural Disaster Reserves, Economic Disaster Reserves, Cash Flow Reserves, and Capital Replacement Reserves. As of June 30, 2023, all of these categories are fully funded to target levels. Assigned Assigned funds are constrained by the City's intent to use them for specific purposes and represent a total of $63,825,000 (27%) of the total fund balance. $22,623,000 represents funds for approved multi -year capital projects that were not spent by the end of the year, therefore they are carried over until the projects are completed. Available Measure G sales tax revenue ended the year at $29,214,000 and $11,987,000 represents funds held in trust with the County of Riverside for fire services. Unassigned The remaining fund balance or $36,041,000 represents unassigned fund balances or the residual net resources after taking into consideration the other classifications. The Capital Improvement Fund accounted for $6,100,000 of the negative $8,064,000 balance of all other funds. The remaining negative balance was largely attributed to the Library Development Impact Fee Fund. This amount represents an advance due to the Redevelopment (RDA) Successor Agency and is included in the Successor Agency of the former RDA as a receivable. General Fund The General Fund is the City's chief operating fund. At the end of 2022/23, the unassigned fund balance was $44,105,000 while total fund balance was $185,978,000. The General Fund balance increased by $20,070,000 in 2022/23. Key factors were: A year -over -year decrease of $2,236,000 in non -spendable is attributed the 2022/23 Redevelopment Agency loan repayment of $2,696,000 offset by interest earnings of $381,000 resulted in a net decrease of $2,315,000 in Due from Other Governments. The outstanding loan balance of $24,501,000 is recognized as 80% in the General Fund and 20% in the Housing Authority Fund. Restricted reserves are limited to funds held in a Section 115 Pension Trust set aside to fund the City's pension obligations. The trust was initially established in 2018/19 with $6,540,000 and in 2019/20 an additional $3,460,000 was deposited. In FY 2022/23, a one-time additional discretionary payment of $5,000,000 was made to CalPERS to pay down the City's unfunded pension obligations utilizing pension trust funds. Committed reserves increased by $10,391,000 due to operational carryovers and due to the recent update to the City's Reserve Policy which include increasing and funding the new target levels for the Natural Disaster 11 264 Emergency Reserves, Economic Downturn Reserves, and the Capital Improvement Reserves categories. An increase of $6,524,000 in assigned reserves was due to Measure G sales tax reserve ($13,859,000) and the advanced funding no longer needing to be subsidized by the City which has been placed back in reserves and ($803,000) in the fire services trust. Assigned to public safety represents property tax accumulated and held in trust by the County of Riverside for fire protection, disaster preparedness and response, fire prevention, rescue, hazardous materials mitigation, technical rescue response, medical emergency services, and public service assistance (the County and City negotiated an agreement wherein the County fire service property tax revenue generated in the two former City redevelopment project areas is pledged to the City to fund the aforementioned services). This portion of assigned fund balance as of June 30, 2023 is $11,987,000. These increases combined with a decrease in multi -year Capital Projects ($8,138,000) contributed to the overall increase in assigned reserves. Housing Authority Fund The Housing Authority Fund is used to account for the activities of the Housing Authority; the Housing Authority invests in programs and projects that preserve and increase the supply of affordable housing in the City. The fund balance decreased by $496,000 to end the year at $26,366,000. Capital Improvement Fund The Capital Improvement Fund is primarily used to record the expenditures for capital projects. The fund had forty-seven (47) active Capital Improvement Projects budgeted during 2022/23. The five most active projects were: • Dune Palms Bridge Improvements ($4,050,000) • La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvements ($2,923,000) • Avenue 53 and Jefferson Roundabout ($2,758,000) • Citywide Striping Refresh ($295,000) • Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Improvements ($285,000) These projects, along with others, leveraged State or Federal grant funds or were significantly supported with Measure G sales tax revenues. The City of La Quinta's proprietary funds provide the same type of information found in the government -wide financial statements, but in more detail. 12 265 The financial activities of the City enterprise fund are addressed in the discussion of the City's business -type activities. In addition, the City has four (4) internal service funds to accumulate resources for equipment and vehicle replacement, information technology, insurance, and park equipment and facility replacement. Most General Fund revenues experienced positive variances when compared to the final budget specifically related to use of money and property and tax revenues. Revenue appropriations and transfers in increased by $17,428,000 between the original ($68,321,000) and final amended budget ($85,749,000). The category representing the largest variances is taxes which represents 76% of all General Fund revenues. Actuals for taxes include the three largest funding sources for the City — sales taxes $28,888,000, transient occupancy taxes (TOT) $16,688,000, and property taxes $11,224,000. Combined, these top three revenues account for $56,800,000 or 87% of all taxes, resulting in a $1,864,000 increase from the prior fiscal year primarily in property taxes and sales taxes offset by a decrease in transient occupancy taxes. The Extraordinary Item includes $381,000 to record the annual former Redevelopment Agency loan repayment interest earned in 2022/23. The loan repayments are structured to pay all principal first, then interest. Each year the City records the payment received and interest earned in accordance with the State Department of Finance approved loan repayment schedule. Loan repayments are not budgeted; these funds are recognized in unassigned reserves and reduce non -spendable reserves each year. Furthermore, 80% of the extraordinary gain is recognized in the General Fund and 20% in the Housing Authority Fund. Expenditure appropriations and transfers out increased by $49,652,000 between the original ($64,651,000) and final amended budget ($114,303,000) which included the following significant change: • $30,762,000 in operational and capital improvement project carryover appropriations from prior fiscal years to 2022/23 as approved by City Council. Capital Assets The City's capital assets for its governmental and business -type activities as of June 30, 2023, were $575,735,000 (net of accumulated depreciation). This includes land, right of way, buildings and improvements, machinery and equipment, streets and bridges, construction in progress, and the right to use leased assets. The investment in capital assets decreased by $472,000 in 2022/23 primarily due to an increase in construction in progress. The following chart lists the asset categories for governmental and business -like activities net of depreciation: 13 266 City of La Quinta Capital Assets (net of depreciation) Description Governmental Activities 2022 As Restated 2023 Business -Type Activities 2022 As Restated 2023 Total By Fiscal Year 2022 As Restated 2023 Land $ 81,790,496 $ 83,717,732 $ 39,712,956 $ 39,712,956 $ 121,503,452 $ 123,430,688 Buildings & Inprovements 36,203,626 36,354,815 2,698,640 2,484,095 38,902,266 38,838,910 Equipment & Furniture 1,127,854 1,147,737 82,227 49,910 1,210,081 1,197,647 Vehicles 917,322 1,281,556 - - 917,322 1,281,556 Infrastructure 394,887,936 401,770,282 - - 394,887,936 401,770,282 Right to use Leased Assets 157,485 49,643 563,778 311,085 721,263 360,728 Right to use Subscription IT Assets 945,351 592,321 - - 945,351 592,321 Construction in Progress 17 119 485 8,263,007 17 119 485 8,263 007 533 149 555 533,177,093 43,057,601 42,558,045 576 207 156 575,735,138 TOTAL Major capital asset events under Governmental Activities included the following: • Recording infrastructure improvements, street improvements, street right of way, street sidewalks and curbs and gutters, traffic signals, street medians, and construction in progress. Business -Type Activities The Golf Course capital asset balance at June 30, 2023, was $42,558,000, net of accumulated depreciation. The balance decrease of $500,000 reflects accumulated depreciation and amortization expensed in 2022/23. Additional information on the City of La Quinta's capital assets can be found in Note 4 to the financial statements. Long -Term Debt At the end of 2022/23, the City governmental activities had total outstanding debt of $1,703,000, which is $254,000 less than the previous year. Of the total amount, $53,000 represents leases and $1,154,000 in employee compensated absences. City of La Quinta Outstanding Debt Governmental Activities 2022 Debt Type: As Restated 2023 Leases $ 162,648 $ 53,111 Financed Purchases 22,079 551 Compensated Absences 962,229 1,154,090 Subscription IT liabilities 810,483 495,674 TOTAL $ 1,957,439 $ 1,703,426 Additional information on long-term debt can be found in Note 5 of the financial statements. 14 267 This financial report is designed to provide a general overview of the City's finances. Questions concerning this information or requests for additional information should be addressed to the City of La Quinta, Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA, 92253, by telephone at 760-777-7055, or by email at finance@laquintaca. 15 268 Assets Cash and investments Restricted cash and investments Receivables Accounts Taxes Notes and loans Accrued interest Leases Prepaid costs Deposits Due from other governments Inventories Land held for resale Net OPEB asset Capital assets not being depreciated Capital assets, net of depreciation Right to use lease assets, net of accumulated amortization Right to use subscription IT assets, net of accumulated amortization Total assets Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred amounts related to OPEB Deferred amounts related to pensions Total deferred outflows of resources Liabilities Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Unearned revenue Deposits payable Accrued interest Due to other governments Noncurrent liabilities Due within one year Due in more than one year Total liabilities City of La Quinta, California Statement of Net Position June 30, 2023 Primary Government Governmental Business -Type Activities Activities Total $ 228,672,516 $ 1,183,294 $ 229,855,810 5,317,487 - 5,317,487 1,650,990 - 1,650,990 7,581,730 - 7,581,730 22,494,501 - 22,494,501 5,568,153 554 5,568,707 1,432,355 - 1,432,355 379,516 - 379,516 47,964 250,000 297,964 30,161,609 - 30,161,609 - 112,282 112,282 5,403,652 - 5,403,652 377,488 - 377,488 378,055,087 39,712,956 417,768,043 154,480,042 2,534,005 157,014,047 49,643 311,085 360,728 592,321 - 592,321 842,265,054 44,104,176 886,369,230 369,541 19,249,577 19, 619,118 6,655,971 649,254 11,468,560 6,319,068 51 1,121,231 694,575 14,559,404 41,468,114 - 369,541 - 19,249,577 19, 619,118 343,903 35,500 420 191,659 123,861 695,343 6,999,874 649,254 11,468,560 6,354,568 471 1,121,231 886,234 14,683,265 42,163,457 See Notes to Financial Statements 16 269 This page intentionally left blank. 270 Deferred Inflows of Resources Deferred amounts related to OPEB Deferred amounts related to pensions Deferred amounts related to leases Total deferred inflows of resources Net Position Net investment in capital assets Restricted for Planning and development projects Public safety Public works Capital projects Community services Other Unrestricted Total net position City of La Quinta, California Statement of Net Position June 30, 2023 Primary Government Governmental Business -Type Activities Activities Total $ 591,305 3,284,647 1,351,619 5,227,571 $ 591,305 3,284,647 1,351,619 5,227,571 532,627,757 42,242,526 574,870,283 27,585,913 - 27,585,913 1,278,307 - 1,278,307 7,535,519 - 7,535,519 9,794,607 - 9,794,607 15,711,786 - 15,711,786 377,488 - 377,488 220,277,110 1,166,307 221,443,417 $ 815,188,487 $ 43,408,833 $ 858,597,320 See Notes to Financial Statements 17 271 Functions/Programs Expenses Primary Government General government $ 17,213,248 Public safety 25,457,350 Planning and development 3,146,264 Community services 9,550,001 Public works 14,043,797 Interest on long-term debt 25,504 Total governmental activities Business -Type Activities Golf Course Total primary government City of La Quinta, California Statement of Activities Year Ended June 30, 2023 Program Revenues Operating Capital Charges for Contributions Contributions Services and Grants and Grants $ 1,716,965 $ 20,138 $ 272,066 555,423 - 170,167 1,356,426 138,974 4,010,626 185,979 5,987,860 - 2,736,907 989,386 4,307,929 69,436,164 6,551,700 7,136,358 8,760,788 5,520,342 4,767,458 $ 74,956,506 $ 11,319,158 $ 7,136,358 $ 8,760,788 General Revenues Taxes Property taxes, levied for general purpose Transient occupancy taxes Sales taxes Franchise taxes Business licenses taxes Othertaxes Motor vehicle in lieu - unrestricted Investment income Net change in fair value of investments Other Transfers Total General Revenues and Transfers Change in Net Position Net Position at Beginning of Year, as restated Net Position at End of Year See Notes to Financial Statements 18 272 City of La Quinta, California Statement of Activities Year Ended June 30, 2023 Net (Expense) Revenue and Changes in Net Position Total Primary Government Program Governmental Business -Type Revenues Activities Activities Total $ 2,009,169 $ (15,204,079) $ 725,590 (24,731,760) 5,506,026 2,359,762 6,173,839 (3,376,162) 8,034,222 (6,009,575) - (25,504) 22,448,846 (46,987,318) - $ (15,204,079) - (24,731,760) - 2,359,762 - (3,376,162) (6,009,575) (25,504) (46,987,318) 4,767,458 - (752,884) (752,884) $ 27,216,304 (46,987,318) (752,884) (47,740,202) 20,697,081 - 20,697,081 19,262,569 - 19,262,569 28,888,079 - 28,888,079 2,375,729 - 2,375,729 489,738 - 489,738 926,743 - 926,743 5,110,569 - 5,110,569 5,058,717 12,456 5,071,173 (1,519,171) 20,665 (1,498,506) 1,432,619 - 1,432,619 (600,000) 600,000 - 82,122,673 633,121 82,755,794 35,135,355 (119,763) 35,015,592 780,053,132 43,528,596 823,581,728 $ 815,188,487 $ 43,408,833 $ 858,597,320 See Notes to Financial Statements 19 273 Assets Pooled cash and investments Restricted cash and investments Receivables Accounts Taxes Notes and loans Accrued interest Leases Prepaid costs Deposits Due from other governments Due from other funds Land held for resale Total assets Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources and Fund Balances Liabilities Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Unearned revenues Deposits payable Due to other governments Due to other funds Total liabilities City of La Quinta, California Balance Sheet — Governmental Funds June 30, 2023 Special Capital Projects Revenue Funds Fund Other Total Housing Disaster Capital Governmental Governmental General Authority Recovery Improvement Funds Funds $ 153,479,076 $ 19,341,514 $ 9,928,036 $ $ 34,338,192 $ 217,086,818 5,317,487 - - - 5,317,487 442,644 103,604 934,765 169,977 1,650,990 6,946,383 - - 635,347 7,581,730 - 22,494,501 - - 22,494,501 130,076 5,388,914 8,794 30,106 5,557,890 1,432,355 - - - 1,432,355 125,993 - 468 126,461 - 47,964 - - 47,964 20,898,192 4,900,199 2,778,080 1,585,138 30,161,609 2,796,975 - - - 2,796,975 5,403,652 - - - - 5,403,652 $ 196,972,833 $ 52,276,696 $ 9,936,830 $ 3,712,845 $ 36,759,228 $ 299,658,432 $ 2,517,578 $ 68,780 $ $ 2,652,202 $ 788,168 $ 6,026,728 572,702 19,697 - 44,574 636,973 - - 9,987,008 1,481,552 - 11,468,560 6,292,718 26,350 - - - 6,319,068 2,604 - - 1,118,627 1,121,231 - - - 1,965,854 831,121 2,796,975 9,385,602 114,827 9,987,008 6,099,608 2,782,490 28,369,535 Deferred Inflows of Resources Unavailable revenue 258,104 25,796,035 Leases 1,351,619 - Total Deferred Inflows of Resources 1,609,723 25,796,035 3,712,845 350,326 30,117,310 - - 1,351,619 3,712,845 350,326 31,468,929 See Notes to Financial Statements 20 274 City of La Quinta, California Balance Sheet — Governmental Funds June 30, 2023 Special Capital Projects Revenue Funds Fund Other Total Housing Disaster Capital Governmental Governmental General Authority Recovery Improvement Funds Funds Fund Balances Nonspendable Prepaid costs $ 125,993 $ $ $ $ 468 $ 126,461 Land held for resale 5,403,652 - 5,403,652 Due from successor agency 19,600,793 - 19,600,793 Restricted for Planning and development projects - 26,365,834 1,220,079 27,585,913 Public safety - 1,278,307 1,278,307 Community services 15,711,786 15,711,786 Public works 7,535,519 7,535,519 Capital projects - 9,794,607 9,794,607 Section 115 trust 5,317,487 - 5,317,487 Committed to Natural Disaster Reserve 15,000,000 15,000,000 Economic Downturn Reserve 13,000,000 13,000,000 Cash Flow Reserve 5,000,000 5,000,000 Capital Replacement Reserve 12,000,000 12,000,000 Carryovers 2,600,009 2,600,009 Assigned for Public safety 11,986,970 11,986,970 Sales Tax Reserve 29,214,191 29,214,191 Capital projects 22,623,372 22,623,372 Unassigned 44,105,041 (50,178) (6,099,608) (1,914,354) 36,040,901 Total fund balance 185,977,508 26,365,834 (50,178) - (6,099,608) 33,626,412 239,819,968 Total liabilities, deferred inflows of resources and fund balances $ 196,972,833 $ 52,276,696 $ 9,936,830 $ 3,712,845 $ 36,759,228 $ 299,658,432 See Notes to Financial Statements 21 275 City of La Quinta, California Reconciliation of the Governmental Funds Balance Sheet to the Statement of Net Position Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of net position are different because: Fund balances of governmental funds Capital assets net of accumulated depreciation/amortization are not financial resources, and therefore have not been included as current financial resources in governmental fund activity Net OPEB asset is not considered a current financial resource Long-term liabilities, including leases, compensated absences and pension liabilities are not due and payable in the current period and therefore are not reported in the governmental funds: Leases Financed purchases Compensated absences Net pension liability Deferred outflows related to pensions Deferred outflows related to OPEB Deferred inflows related to pensions Deferred inflows related to OPEB Revenues reported as unavailable revenue in the governmental funds are recognized in the statement of activities Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities, such as equipment management and self-insurance, to individual funds. The assets and liabilities of the internal service funds are included in governmental activities of the statement of net position Net Position of Governmental Activities $ (16,649) (551) (1,154,090) (13,550,553) June 30, 2023 $ 239,819,968 519,153,301 377,488 (14,721,843) 19, 249, 577 369,541 (3,284,647) (591,305) 30,117, 310 24,699,097 $ 815,188,487 See Notes to Financial Statements 22 276 City of La Quinta, California Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances — Governmental Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Special Capital Projects Revenue Funds Fund Other Total Housing Disaster Capital Governmental Governmental General Authority Recovery Improvements Funds Funds Revenues Taxes $ 65,146,000 $ $ $ $ 2,121,115 $ 67,267,115 Assessments - 981,315 981,315 Licenses and permits 3,994,989 - 3,994,989 Intergovernmental 9,989,061 391,120 5,973,761 16,353,942 Charges for services 1,558,784 - - 1,558,784 Investment income (loss) 3,282,418 1,782,543 208,625 747,080 6,020,666 Net decrease in fair value of investments (893,437) (88,316) (161,695) (284,853) (1,428,301) Fines and forfeitures 563,494 - - 563,494 Developer participation - - 420 4,215,701 4,216,121 Miscellaneous 2,479,742 96,405 - - 26,101 2,602,248 Total revenues 86,121,051 1,790,632 46,930 391,540 13,780,220 102,130,373 Expenditures Current General government 20,966,498 907 20,967,405 Public safety 25,362,426 - - 94,924 25,457,350 Planning and development 4,303,714 1,830,275 33,757 335,345 6,503,091 Community services 5,782,682 254,998 - 2,025,777 8,063,457 Public works 2,148,743 - - 4,321,870 6,470,613 Capital outlay 536,087 201,409 13,394,469 48,347 14,180,312 Debt service Principal 10,764 - - - 10,764 Interest - - - 25,504 25,504 Total expenditures 59,110,914 2,286,682 13,428,226 6,852,674 81,678,496 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures 27,010,137 (496,050) 46,930 (13,036,686) 6,927,546 20,451,877 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - 7,927,550 2,152,000 10,079,550 Transfers out (6,939,642) - (3,739,908) (10,679,550) Total other financing sources (uses) (6,939,642) - 7,927,550 (1,587,908) (600,000) Net Changes in Fund Balances 20,070,495 (496,050) 46,930 (5,109,136) 5,339,638 19,851,877 Fund Balances, Beginning of Year, As Restated 165,907,013 26,861,884 (97,108) (990,472) 28,286,774 219,968,091 Fund Balances, End of Year $ 185,977,508 $ 26,365,834 $ (50,178) $ (6,099,608) $ 33,626,412 $ 239,819,968 See Notes to Financial Statements 23 277 City of La Quinta, California Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Amounts reported for governmental activities in the statement of activities are different because: Net changes in fund balances - total governmental funds Governmental funds report capital projects (outlays) as expenditures. However, in the statement of activities, the costs of those assets are allocated over their estimated useful lives as depreciation and amortization expense. This is the amount by which capital outlays exceeded depreciation in the current period. Purchase of capital assets recorded in governmental funds Capital outlay recorded in governmental funds that is attributed to repairs and maintenance projects that do not increase the service life or capacity of a capital asset Depreciation and Amortization Expense, net of adjustments for deletions Debt service payments for principal payments are reported as expenditures in the governmental funds, but are not reported as expenses in the statement of activities Lease principal payments Financed purchases payments Compensated absences expenses reported in the statement of activities do not require the use of current financial resources and, therefore, are not reported as expenditures in governmental funds. Governmental funds report OPEB contributions as expenditures. However, in the Statement of Activities, OPEB expense is measured as the change in OPEB liability and the amortization of deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to OPEB. This amount represents the net change in OPEB related amounts. Governmental funds report pension contributions as expenditures. However, in the Statement of Activities, pension expense is measured as the change in pension liability and the amortization of deferred outflows and inflows of resources related to pension. This amount represents the net change in pension related amounts. Revenues reported as unavailable revenue in the governmental funds are recognized as operating contributions and grants in the statement of activities. Internal service funds are used by management to charge the costs of certain activities, such as equipment management and self-insurance, to individual funds. The net revenues (expenses) of the internal service funds is reported with governmental activities. Change in net position of governmental activities Funds to the Statement of Activities Year Ended June 30, 2023 $ 14,180,312 (4,911,083) (8,926,070) $ 19,851,877 343,159 10,764 21,528 (191,861) (12,394) 11,526,881 2,482,251 1,103,150 $ 35,135,355 See Notes to Financial Statements 24 278 City of La Quinta, California Statement of Net Position — Proprietary Funds June 30, 2023 Assets Current Pooled cash and investments Receivables Accrued interest Prepaid costs Deposits Inventories Total current assets Noncurrent Capital assets not being depreciated Capital assets, net of depreciation Right to use lease assets, net of accumulated amortization Right to use subscription IT assets, net of accumulated amortization Total noncurrent assets Total assets Liabilities and Net Position Liabilities Current Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Deposits payable Accrued interest Current portion of lease liability Current portion of subscription IT liability Total current liabilities Noncurrent Long-term portion of lease liability Long-term portion of subscription IT liability Total noncurrent liabilities Total liabilities Net Position Net investment in capital assets Unrestricted Total net position Total liabilities and net position Business -Type Activities Enterprise Funds Golf Course Governmental Activities Internal Service Funds $ 1,183,294 $ 11,585,698 554 250,000 112,282 1,546,130 39,712,956 2,534,005 311,085 42,558,046 44,104,176 343,903 35,500 420 191,659 571,482 123,861 123,861 695,343 42,242,526 1,166,307 43,408,833 $ 44,104,176 10,263 253,055 11,849,016 5,904,644 7,493,719 33,108 592,321 14,023,792 25,872,808 629,243 12,281 51 31,159 352,117 1,024,851 5,303 143,557 148,860 1,173,711 13,491,656 11,207,441 24,699,097 $ 25,872,808 See Notes to Financial Statements 25 279 City of La Quinta, California Statement of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Fund Net Position — Proprietary Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Business -Type Governmental Activities Activities - Enterprise Funds Internal Golf Course Service Funds Operating Revenues Sales and service charges $ 4,767,458 $ 5,397,132 Total operating revenues 41767,458 5,397,132 Operating Expenses Administration and general 170,828 232,217 Fuel and oil - 138,412 Maintenance and parts 6,676 392,721 Contract services 4,602,361 1,319,083 Software and supplies - 1,211,891 Depreciation and amortization expense 499,555 1,558,551 Other 240,922 - Total operating expenses 5,520,342 4,852,875 Operating Income (Loss) (752,884) 544,257 Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses) Investment income 12,456 229,187 Net change in fair value of investments 20,665 (90,871) Miscellaneous revenues - 208,148 Gain on disposal of capital assets - 234,172 Interest expense - (21,743) Total nonoperating revenues (expenses) 33,121 558,893 Income (Loss) Before Transfers (719,763) 1,103,150 Transfers in 600,000 - Total transfers 600,000 - Changes in Net Position (119,763) 1,103,150 Net Position, Beginning of the Year, as restated 43,528,596 23,595,947 Net Position at End of Year $ 43,408,833 $ 24,699,097 See Notes to Financial Statements 26 280 City of La Quinta, California Statement of Cash Flows — Proprietary Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Business -Type Governmental Activities- Activities - Enterprise Funds Internal Golf Course Service Funds Operating Activities Cash received from customers and users $ 4,727,503 $ - Cash received from interfund services provided - 5,397,132 Cash payments to suppliers for goods and services (4,865,565) (2,842,904) Cash payments to employees for services (170,828) - Net Cash from Operating Activities (308,890) 2,554,228 Non -Capital Financing Activities Cash transfers in 600,000 - Capital and Financing Activities Cash paid for lease liability- principal portion (250,317) (98,773) Cash paid for lease liability- interest portion (352) (1,371) Capital contributions - 208,148 Acquisition and construction of capital assets - (1,126,503) Proceeds from sales of capital assets - 234,172 Cash paid for subscription liability- principal portion - (431,239) Cash paid for subscription liability- interest portion - (9,848) Net Cash used for Capital and Related Financing Activities (250,669) (1,225,414) Investing activities Investment income 32,901 123,751 Net Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 73,342 1,452,565 Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 1,109,952 10,133,133 Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year $ 1,183,294 $ 11,585,698 See Notes to Financial Statements 27 281 City of La Quinta, California Statement of Cash Flows — Proprietary Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Business -Type Governmental Activities- Activities - Enterprise Funds Internal Golf Course Service Funds Reconciliation of Operating (Loss) to Net Cash used for Operating Income Operating income (loss) $ (752,884) $ 544,257 Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash from (used for) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 499,555 1,558,551 Changesin Inventories (39,955) - Prepaid costs - (23,533) Accounts payable (15,606) 464,088 Accrued liabilities - 10,865 Net Cash from Operating Activities $ (308,890) $ 2,554,228 Non Cash Capital and Related Financing Activities Subscription liability for the acquisition of a right to use subscription IT asset $ - $ 116,430 See Notes to Financial Statements 28 282 City of La Quinta, California Statement of Fiduciary Net Position June 30, 2023 Pension Trust Private -Purpose Fund Trust Fund Successor Supplemental Agency of the Pension Plan former RDA Assets Pooled cash and investments $ 78,261 $ 15,570,390 Receivables Accounts - 23 Accrued interest 69 170 Prepaid costs - 283,042 Due from other governments - 1,118,627 Restricted assets Cash and investments with fiscal agent - 1,549 Total assets 78,330 16,973,801 Deferred Outflows of Resources Deferred charge on refunding - 14,641,514 Total deferred outflows of resources - 14,641,514 Liabilities Accrued interest - 1,053,666 Long-term liabilities Due in one year - 16,692,076 Due in more than one year - 168,753,382 Total liabilities - 186,499,124 Net Position (Deficit) Restricted for pensions $ 78,330 - Held in trust $ (154,883,809) See Notes to Financial Statements 29 283 City of La Quinta, California Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position Year Ended June 30, 2023 Pension Trust Private -Purpose Fund Trust Fund Successor Supplemental Agency of the Pension Plan Former RDA Additions Taxes $ - $ 20,124,588 Investment income 1,580 35,605 Net change in fair value of investments (253) 28,282 Other revenues 5,000 - Total additions 6,327 20,188,475 Deductions Administrative expenses 12,833 30,864 Interest and fiscal charges - 6,105,657 Total deductions 12,833 6,136,521 Changes in Net Position (6,506) 14,051,954 Net Position/(Deficit) - Beginning of the Year, as restated 84,836 (168,935,763) Net Position/(Deficit) - End of the Year $ 78,330 $ (154,883,809) See Notes to Financial Statements 30 284 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Note 1- Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Reporting Entity The City of La Quinta, California (City) was incorporated May 1, 1982, under the general laws of the State of California. In November 1996, the City became a charter City. The City operates under the Council — Manager form of government. The City provides many community services including public safety, highway and street maintenance, health and social services, cultural and leisure services, public improvements, planning and zoning services, and community development services. The accounting policies of the City conform to generally accepted accounting principles as applicable to governments. As required by generally accepted accounting principles, these financial statements present the City and its component units, which are entities for which the City is considered to be financially accountable. The City is considered to be financially accountable for an organization if the City appoints a voting majority of that organization's governing body and the City is able to impose its will on that organization or there is a potential for that organization to provide specific financial benefits to or impose specific financial burdens on the City. The City is also considered to be financially accountable if an organization is fiscally dependent (i.e., it is unable to adopt its budget, levy taxes, set rates or charges, or issue bonded debt without approval from the City). In certain cases, other organizations are included as component units if the nature and significance of their relationship with the City are such that their exclusion would cause the City's financial statements to be misleading or incomplete. All of the City's component units are considered to be blended component units. Blended component units, although legally separate entities, are, in substance, part of the City's operations and so data from these units are reported with the interfund data of the primary government. The following organizations are considered to be component units of the City: City of La Quinta Public Financing Authority The La Quinta Public Financing Authority (Financing Authority) was established pursuant to a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement dated November 19, 1991, between the City and the Former Redevelopment Agency (now Successor Agency). The purpose of the Financing Authority is to provide financing necessary for the construction of various public improvements through the issuance of debt. Although the Financing Authority is legally separate, it is reported as if it were part of the City because the City Council also serves as the governing board of the Financing Authority and the management of the City has operational responsibility for the Financing Authority. The activities of the Financing Authority are recorded in the debt service fund. Separate financial statements of the Financing Authority are not prepared. 31 285 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 City of La Quinta Housing Authority The La Quinta Housing Authority (Housing Authority) was established pursuant to California Housing Authorities Law (Health and Safety Code Sections 34200 et seq.) on September 15, 2009. The purpose of the Housing Authority is to provide safe and sanitary housing opportunities for La Quinta residents. Although the Housing Authority is legally separate, it is reported as if it were part of the City because the City Council also serves as the governing board of the Housing Authority and the management of the City has operational responsibility for the Housing Authority. The activities of the Housing Authority are recorded in the Housing Authority Special Revenue Fund. Separate financial statements of the Housing Authority are not prepared. Government -Wide and Fund Financial Statements The basic financial statements of the City are composed of the following: • Government -wide financial statements • Fund financial statements • Notes to the financial statements Government -Wide Financial Statements The government -wide financial statements (i.e., the statement of net position and the statement of activities) report information on all of the nonfiduciary activities of the primary government and its component units. All fiduciary activities are reported only in the fund financial statements. Governmental activities, which normally are supported by taxes, intergovernmental revenues, and other nonexchange transactions, are reported separately from business -type activities, which rely to a significant extent on fees and charges to external customers for support. Likewise, the primary government is reported separately from certain legally separate component units for which the primary government is financially accountable. The statement of activities demonstrates the degree to which the direct expenses of a given function or segments are offset by program revenues. Direct expenses are those that are clearly identifiable with a specific function or segment. Program revenues include charges for services, special assessments, and payments made by parties outside of the reporting City's citizenry if that money is restricted to a particular program. Program revenues are netted with program expenses in the statement of activities to present the net cost of each program. Taxes and other items not properly included among program revenues are reported instead as general revenues. Amounts paid to acquire capital assets are capitalized as assets in the government -wide financial statements, rather than reported as expenditures. Proceeds of long-term debt are recorded as a liability in the government -wide financial statements, rather than as other financing sources. Amounts paid to reduce long- term indebtedness of the reporting government are reported as a reduction of the related liability, rather than as expenditures. 32 286 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Fund Financial Statements The underlying accounting system of the City is organized and operated on the basis of separate funds, each of which is considered to be a separate accounting entity. The operations of each fund are accounted for with a separate set of self -balancing accounts that comprise its assets, deferred outflows of resources, liabilities, deferred inflows of resources, fund equity, revenues and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate. Governmental resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purposes for which they are to be spent and the means by which spending activities are controlled. Fund financial statements for the governmental, proprietary, and fiduciary funds are presented after the government -wide financial statements. These statements display information about major funds individually and nonmajor funds in the aggregate for governmental and proprietary funds. Fiduciary statements include financial information for fiduciary funds. Fiduciary funds of the city primarily represent assets held by the City in a custodial capacity for other individuals or organizations. Measurement Focus, Basis of Accounting and Financial Statement Presentation Government -Wide Financial Statements While separate government -wide and fund financial statements are presented, they are interrelated. The governmental activities column incorporates data from governmental funds and internal service funds, while business -type activities incorporate data from the government's enterprise funds. Separate financial statements are provided for governmental funds, proprietary funds, and fiduciary funds, even though the latter are excluded from the government -wide financial statements. The government -wide financial statements are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recorded when earned and expenses are recorded when a liability is incurred regardless of the related cash flows. Property taxes are recognized in the year they are levied. Grants and similar items are recognized as soon as all eligibility requirements imposed by the providers are met. Governmental Funds In the fund financial statements, governmental funds are presented using the current resources focus and modified -accrual basis of accounting. Their revenues are recognized when they become measurable and available as net current assets. Measurable means that the amounts can be estimated, or otherwise determined. Available means that the amounts were collected during the reporting period or soon enough thereafter to be available to finance the expenditures accrued for the reporting period. The City uses a 60-day availability period. Revenue recognition is subject to the measurable and availability criteria for the governmental funds in the fund financial statements. Exchange transactions are recognized as revenues in the period in which they are earned (i.e., the related goods or services are provided). Locally imposed delivered tax revenues are recognized as revenues in the period in which the underlying exchange transaction on which they are based takes place. Imposed nonexchange transactions are recognized as revenues in the period for which they were imposed. If the period of use is not specified, they are recognized as revenues when an enforceable legal claim to the revenues arises or when they are received, whichever occurs first. Government -mandated and voluntary non - exchange transactions are recognized as revenues when all applicable eligibility requirements have been met. 33 287 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Property taxes, franchise taxes, licenses and interest associated with the current fiscal period are all considered to be susceptible to accrual and so have been recognized as revenues of the current fiscal period. All other revenue items are considered to be measurable and available only when cash is received by the government. In the fund financial statements, governmental funds are presented using the current financial resources measurement focus. This means that only current assets, deferred outflows of resources, current liabilities, and deferred inflows of resources are generally included on their balance sheets. The reported fund balance is considered to be a measure of "available spendable resources". Governmental fund operating statements present increases (revenues and other financing sources) and decreases (expenditures and other financing uses). Accordingly, they are said to present a summary of sources and uses of "available spendable resources" during a period. Noncurrent portions of long-term receivables due to governmental funds are reported on their balance sheets in spite of their spending measurement focus. Special reporting treatments are used to indicate, however, that they should not be considered "available spendable resources", since they do not represent net current assets. Recognition of governmental fund type revenues represented by noncurrent receivables are deferred until they become current receivables. Noncurrent portions of other long-term receivables are offset by fund balance reserve accounts. Because of their spending measurement focus, expenditure recognition for governmental fund types excludes amounts represented by noncurrent liabilities. Since they do not affect net current assets, such long-term amounts are not recognized as governmental fund type expenditures or fund liabilities. Amounts expended to acquire capital assets are recorded as expenditures in the year that resources were expended, rather than as fund assets. The proceeds of long-term debt are recorded as other financing sources rather than as a fund liability. Amounts paid to reduce long-term indebtedness are reported as fund expenditures. Proprietary Funds The City's enterprise and internal service funds are proprietary funds. In the fund financial statements, proprietary funds are presented using the accrual basis of accounting. Revenues are recognized when they are earned, and expenses are recognized when the related goods or services are delivered. In the fund financial statements, proprietary funds are presented using the economic resources measurement focus. This means that all assets, all deferred outflows of resources, all liabilities, and all deferred inflows of resources (whether current or noncurrent) associated with their activity are included on their balance sheets. Proprietary fund type operating statements present increases (revenues) and decreases (expenses) in total net position. Amounts paid to acquire capital assets are capitalized as assets in the proprietary fund financial statements, rather than reported as expenditures. Proceeds of long-term debt are recorded as a liability in the proprietary fund financial statements, rather than as another financing source. Amounts paid to reduce long-term indebtedness of the proprietary funds are reported as a reduction of the related liability, rather than as expenditures. 34 288 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Proprietary funds distinguish operating revenues and expenses from nonoperating items. Operating revenues and expenses generally result from providing services and producing and delivering goods in connection with a proprietary fund's principal ongoing operations. The principal operating revenues of the Enterprise Funds are charges to customers for sales and services. Operating expenses for Enterprise Funds include the cost of sales and services, administrative expenses and depreciation on capital assets. All revenues and expenses not meeting this definition are reported as nonoperating revenues and expenses. Fiduciary Funds The pension and private -purpose trust funds are reported using the economic resources measurement focus and the accrual basis of accounting. Major Funds, Internal Service Funds and Fiduciary Fund Types The City's major governmental funds are as follows: General Fund — This fund is the primary fund of the City and is used to account for all revenue and expenditures of the City not legally restricted as to use. A broad range of municipal activities are provided through this fund including City Manager, City Attorney, Finance, City Clerk, Community Development, Police Services, Public Works, and Community Services. Housing Authority — This fund accounts for the combined housing activities of the Housing Authority in Project Areas 1 and 2 which promotes and provides for quality housing. Revenues will be provided from the receipts and collections of rents, notes and loans. All monies in the Housing Authority must be used in accordance with the applicable housing -related provisions of the California Housing Authorities Law. Disaster Recovery Fund — To account for the use of one-time federal funding designed to deliver relief to American workers and aid in economic recovery in the wake of COVID-19. This Act was passed by Congress in 2021, to provide Coronavirus fiscal recovery funds to state and local governments. Capital Improvement Fund — This capital projects fund is used to account for the planning, design and construction of various capital projects throughout the City. The City's major proprietary fund is as follows: Golf Course —This fund accounts for the activities of the SilverRock Golf Resort. Other fund types of the City are as follows: Special Revenue Funds — These funds account for the proceeds of specific revenue sources that are restricted or committed to expenditures for specified purposes other than debt service or capital projects. Capital Projects Funds —These funds account for financial resources that are restricted, committed, or assigned to expenditures for capital outlay. 35 289 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Debt Service Fund — This fund accounts for the servicing of long-term debt. Internal Service Funds Equipment Replacement Fund — This fund accounts for equipment and vehicle maintenance and replacement services provided to other departments on a cost -reimbursement basis. Information Technology Fund — This fund is used to account for the acquisition for computer equipment, maintenance, and services to support information systems within the City. Costs are reimbursed by the benefiting departments. Park Equipment and Facilities Fund — This fund is used to account for the purchase and replacement of City owned and operated park equipment and facilities. Costs are reimbursed by the benefiting departments. Insurance Fund —This fund accounts for City-wide insurances: liability, property, earthquake, workers compensation and risk management. Expenses are shared among departments on an allocation basis. Fiduciary Funds Pension Trust Fund — This fund accounts for the activities of the Supplemental Pension Savings Plan, which accumulates resources for pension benefit payments to qualified government employees. Private -Purpose Trust Fund — This fund accounts for the assets and liabilities of the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency and its allocated revenue to pay estimated installment payments of enforceable obligations until obligations of the Former Agency are paid in full and assets have been liquidated. Assets, Deferred Outflows of Resources, Liabilities, Deferred Inflows of Resources, and Net Position or Equity Cash and Investments For financial reporting purposes, investments are adjusted to their fair value. Changes in fair value that occur during a fiscal year are recognized as investment income reported for that fiscal year. Investment income includes interest earnings, changes in fair value, and any gains or losses realized upon the liquidation or sale of investments. The City pools cash and investments of all funds, except for assets held within the Section 115 trust and amounts held by fiscal agents. Each fund's share in this pool is displayed in the accompanying financial statements as cash and investments. Investment income earned by the pooled investments is allocated to the various funds based on each fund's month end cash and investment balance. 36 290 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of the statement of cash flows, cash equivalents are defined as short-term, highly liquid investments that are both readily convertible to known amounts of cash or so near their maturity that they present insignificant risk of changes in value because of changes in interest rates. Cash equivalents also represent the proprietary fund's share in the City's cash and investment pool. Cash equivalents have an original maturity date of three months or less from the date of purchase. For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the entire balance of cash and investments on the combined balance sheet for the proprietary funds is considered cash and cash equivalents. Lease Receivable Lease receivable is recorded by the City as the present value of future lease payments expected to be received from the lessee during the lease term, reduced by any provision for estimated uncollectible amounts. Lease receivables are subsequently reduced over the life of the lease as cash is received in the applicable reporting period. The present value of future lease payments to be received are discounted based on the interest rate the City charges the lessee. Restricted Section 115 Trust Cash and Investments All assets in the Section 115 Trust are irrevocably dedicated to funding obligations of the City's pension beneficiaries, other post -employment beneficiaries or costs of administering the Trust. The funds are not considered plan assets of either the pension plan or OPEB plan and are therefore considered restricted assets of the City. Inventory Inventory is valued at cost using the first in/first out (FIFO) method. The City uses the consumption method of accounting for inventories. Prepaid Costs Certain payments to vendors reflect costs applicable to future accounting periods and are recorded as prepaid items in both government -wide and fund financial statements. The City utilizes the consumption method, in which prepaid items are accounted for in the period that the benefit was received. Capital Assets Capital assets (including infrastructure) are recorded at cost where historical records are available and at an estimated historical cost where no historical records exist. Contributed capital assets are valued at their acquisition value at the date of the contribution. Generally, capital asset purchases in excess of $5,000 are capitalized if they have an expected useful life of three years or more. Capital Assets include public domain (infrastructure) consisting of certain improvements including roads, streets, sidewalks, medians, and storm drains. 37 291 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Capital assets used in operations are depreciated over their estimated useful lives using the straight-line method in the government -wide financial statements and in the fund financial statements of the proprietary funds. Depreciation is charged as an expense against operations and accumulated depreciation is reported on the respective balance sheet. The following schedule summarizes capital asset useful lives: Building and improvements Equipment and furniture Vehicles Infrastructure Software Right to use leased asset 10-30 years 3-20 years 5-10 years 10-50 years 5-10 years Shorter of useful life or lease term Right to use lease assets are recognized at the lease commencement date and represent the City's right to use an underlying asset for the lease term. Right to use leased assets are measured at the initial value of the lease liability plus any payments made to the lessor before commencement of the lease term, less any lease incentives received from the lessor at or before the commencement of the lease term, plus any initial direct costs necessary to please the lease asset into service. Right to use leased assets are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or useful lives of the underlying asset using the straight-line method. The amortization period varies from 3 to 5 years. Right to use subscription IT assets are recognized at the subscription commencement date and represent the City's right to use the underlying IT asset for the subscription term. Right to use subscription IT assets are measured at the initial value of the subscription liability plus any payments made to the vendor at the commencement of the subscription term, less any subscription incentives received from the vendor at or before the commencement of the subscription term, plus any capitalizable initial implementation costs necessary to place the subscription asset into service. Right to use subscription IT assets are amortized over the shorter of the subscription term or useful life of the underlying asset using the straight line method. The amortization period varies from 3 to 5 years. Property Taxes Under California law, property taxes are assessed and collected by the counties up to 1 percent of assessed value, plus other increases approved by the voters. The property taxes are recorded initially in a pool, and are then allocated to the cities based on complex formulas. Accordingly, the City of La Quinta accrues only those taxes that are received from the County within sixty days after year-end. Lien date Levy date Due dates Collection dates January 1 July 1 November 1 and February 1 December 10 and April 10 38 292 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Deferred Outflows/Inflows of Resources In addition to assets, the statements of net position and the governmental fund balance sheet will sometimes report a separate section for deferred outflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred outflows of resources, represents a consumption of net assets that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an outflow of resources (expense/expenditure) until then. Governmental activities recorded deferred outflows of resources related to pensions and other post -employment benefits. See Notes 9 and 11 for more information about deferred outflows of pensions and post -employment benefits, respectively. The Private Purpose Trust Fund- Successor Agency of the former RDA recorded deferred outflows of resources related to debt refundings. See Note 19 for more information on the deferred outflows of resources related to debt refundings. In addition to liabilities, the statements of net position and governmental fund balance sheet will sometimes report a separate section for deferred inflows of resources. This separate financial statement element, deferred inflows of resources, represents an acquisition of net assets that applies to a future period(s) and so will not be recognized as an inflow of resources (revenue) until that time. The City has reported two items on the governmental fund balance sheet that qualify for reporting in this category. The first is unavailable revenues that were not received within the City's availability period. These amounts are deferred and recognized as inflows of resources in the period that the amounts become available. At the government -wide statements, this item is eliminated and recognized as revenue in the period earned since "availability" of resources is not a criteria used in government -wide statements. The second item is a deferred inflow related to leases where the City is the lessor. The deferred inflows of resources related to leases is recognized on a straight line basis as an inflow of resources (revenue) over the term of the lease. Additionally, governmental activities recorded deferred inflows of resources related to pensions and OPEB. See Notes 9 and 11 for more information about deferred inflows of pensions and post -employment benefits, respectively. Compensated Absences Vacation and sick time are vested on a percentage based on number of years employed at the City. Maximum accumulation of sick and vacation is 40 and 60 days, respectively. Upon termination or retirement, permanent employees are entitled to receive compensation at their current base salary for all unused vacation leave. If an employee terminates with a minimum of two years' service, the employee is entitled to receive 25 percent of the value of his unused sick leave. The percentage increases by 25 percent for each five-year period until the employee is entitled to 100 percent of the value of their unused sick leave. This will occur upon the completion of twenty years of continuous employment. The General Fund resources are used to pay for the accumulated benefits to employees. Long -Term Obligations In the government -wide financial statements and proprietary fund financial statements, long-term debt and other long-term obligations are reported as liabilities in the applicable governmental activities, business -type activities or proprietary fund type statement of net position. Bond premiums and discounts are deferred and amortized over the life of the bonds using the effective interest method. Bonds payable are reported net of the applicable bond premium or discount. 39 293 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 In the fund financial statements, governmental fund types recognize bond premiums and discounts, as well as bond issuance costs, during the current period. The face amount of debt issued is reported as other financing sources. Premiums received on debt issuances are reported as other financing sources while discounts on debt issuances are reported as other financing uses. Issuance costs, whether or not withheld from the actual debt proceeds received, are reported as debt service expenditures. Lease liabilities represent the City's obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Lease liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of future lease payments expected to be made during the lease term. The present value of lease payments is discounted based on a borrowing rate determined by the City. Subscription liabilities represent the City's obligation to make subscription payments arising from the subscription contract. Subscription liabilities are recognized at the subscription commencement date based on the present value of future subscription payments expected to be made during the subscription term. The present value of subscription payments is discounted based on a borrowing rate determined by the City. Fund Balance In the fund financial statements, governmental funds report the following fund balance classifications: Nonspendable includes amounts that cannot be spent because they are either (a) not in spendable form or (b) legally or contractually required to be maintained intact. Restricted includes amounts that are constrained on the use of resources by either (a) external creditors, grantors, contributors, or laws of regulations of other governments or (b) by law through constitutional provisions or enabling legislation. Committed includes amounts that can only be used for specific purposes pursuant to constraints imposed by formal action of the City's highest authority, the City Council. The formal action that is required to be taken to establish, modify, or rescind a fund balance commitment is by a resolution. Assigned includes amounts that are constrained by the City's intent to be used for specific purposes but are neither restricted nor committed. City Council is authorized to assign amounts to a specific purpose. The City Council authorizes assigned amounts for specific purposes pursuant to the policy -making powers granted through a resolution. Unassigned includes the residual amounts that have not been restricted, committed, or assigned to specific purposes. The general fund is the only fund that reports a positive unassigned fund balance. 40 294 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Fund Balance Flow Assumptions — governmental fund financial statements Sometimes the City will fund outlays for a particular purpose from both restricted and unrestricted resources (the total of committed, assigned, and unassigned fund balance). In order to calculate the amounts to report as restricted, committed, assigned, and unassigned fund balance in the governmental fund financial statements a flow assumption must be made about the order in which the resources are considered to be applied. It is the City's policy to consider restricted fund balance to have been depleted before using any of the components of unrestricted fund balance. Further, when the components of unrestricted fund balance can be used for the same purpose, committed fund balance is depleted first, followed by assigned fund balance. Unassigned fund balance is applied last. Net Position Flow Assumption — government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements Sometimes the City will fund outlays for a particular purpose from both restricted (e.g., restricted bond or grant proceeds) and unrestricted resources. In order to calculate the amounts to report as restricted net position and unrestricted net position in the government -wide and proprietary fund financial statements, a flow assumption must be made about the order in which the resources are considered to be applied. It is the City's policy to consider restricted net position to have been depleted before unrestricted net position is applied. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, and deferred outflows/inflows of resources and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenditures/expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. New Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Year GASB Statement No. 91— In May 2019, the GASB issued Statement No. 91, Conduit Debt Obligations. The objective of this Statement is to provide a single method of reporting conduit debt obligations by issues and eliminate diversity in practice. The Statement is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2021, or FY 2022/2023. The City has determined that this Statement does not have a material effect on the financial statements. GASB Statement No. 94— In March 2020, the GASB issued Statement No. 94, Public -Private and Public -Public Partnerships and Availability Payment Arrangements. The objective of this Statement is to improve financial reporting by addressing issues related to public -private and public -public partnership arrangements (PPPs). The Statement is effective for reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2022, or FY 2022/2023. The City has determined that this Statement does not have a material effect on the financial statements. 41 295 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 GASB Statement No. 96 — As of July 1, 2022, the City adopted GASB Statement No. 96, Subscription -Based Information Technology Arrangements (SBITAs). The implementation of this standard establishes that a SBITA results in a right to use subscription IT asset -an intangible asset - and a corresponding liability. The standard provides the capitalization criteria for outlays other than subscription payments, including implementation costs of a SBITA. The Statement requires recognition of certain SBITA assets and liabilities for SBITAs that previously were recognized as outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. As a result of implementing this standard the City recognized a right to use subscription asset and subscription liability of $945,351 and $810,483 as of July 1, 2022, respectively. As a result of these adjustments there was no effect on beginning net position. The additional disclosures required by this standard are included in Notes 4, 5 and 18. Effective in Future Fiscal Years The City is currently evaluating the potential impact of the following issued, but not yet effective, accounting standards. GASB Statement No. 99 — In April 2022, the GASB issued Statement No. 99, Omnibus 2022. The objectives of this Statement are to enhance comparability in accounting and reporting and to improve the consistency of authoritative literature by addressing (1) practice issues that have been identified during implementation and application of certain GASB Statements and (2) accounting and financial reporting for financial guarantees. The requirements of this Statement related to extension of the use of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), accounting for Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) distributions, disclosures of nonmonetary transactions, pledges of future revenues by pledging governments, clarification of certain provisions in Statement No. 34, as amended, and terminology updates related to Statements No. 53 and No. 63 are effective upon issuance. The requirements of this Statement related to leases, Public -Private and Public -Public Partnerships (PPPs), and Subscription -Based Information Technology Arrangements (SBITAs) are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2022, and all reporting periods thereafter. The requirements of this Statement related to financial guarantees and the classification and reporting of derivative instruments within the scope of Statement No. 53 are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2023, and all reporting periods thereafter. The City has not determined the effect on the financial statements. GASB Statement No. 100 — In June 2022, the GASB issued Statement No. 100, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections —An Amendment of GASB Statement No. 62. The primary objective of this Statement is to enhance accounting and financial reporting requirements for accounting changes and error corrections to provide more understandable, reliable, relevant, consistent, and comparable information for making decisions or assessing accountability. The requirements of this Statement are effective for accounting changes and error corrections made in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2023, and all reporting periods thereafter. The City has not determined the effect on the financial statements. GASB Statement No. 101— In June 2022, the GASB issued Statement No. 101, Compensated Absences. The objective of this Statement is to better meet the information needs of financial statement users by updating the recognition and measurement guidance for compensated absences. That objective is achieved by aligning the recognition and measurement guidance under a unified model and by amending certain previously required disclosures. The requirements of this Statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2023, and all reporting periods thereafter. The City has not determined the effect on the financial statements. 42 296 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 GASB Statement No. 102 — In December 2023, the GASB issued Statement No. 102, Certain Risk Disclosures. The objective of this Statement is to provide users of government financial statements with essential information about risks related to a state or local government's vulnerabilities due to the variety of risks they face. The requirements of this Statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2024. The City has not determined the effect on the financial statements. GASB Statement No. 103 — In April 2024, the GASB issued Statement No. 103, Financial Reporting Model Improvements. The objective of this statement is to improve key components of the financial reporting model to enhance its effectiveness in providing information that is essential for decision making and assessing a government's accountability. The requirements of this Statement are effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2025. The City has not determined the effect on the financial statements. Note 2 - Cash and Investments Cash and investments as of June 30, 2023, are classified in the accompanying financial statements as follows: Statement of Net Position Cash and investments $ 229,855,810 Restricted cash and investments 5,317,487 Statement of Fiduciary Net Position Cash and investments 15,648,651 Cash and investments with fiscal agent 1,549 Total cash and investments $ 250,823,497 Cash and investment as of June 30, 2023, consist of the following: Cash on hand $ 4,300 Deposits with financial institutions 7,502,528 Investments 243,316,669 Total cash and investments $ 250,823,497 Investments Authorized by the California Government Code and the City's Investment Policy The table below identifies the investment types that are authorized by the California Government Code and the City's investment policy. The table also identifies certain provisions of the California Government Code (or the City's investment policy, if more restrictive) that address interest rate risk, credit risk, and concentration of credit risk. 43 297 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 This table does not address investments of debt proceeds held by bond trustee that are governed by the provisions of debt agreements of the City, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the City's investment policy. Maximum Investment Types Maturity U.S. Treasury Obligations 5 years U.S. Agency Securities 5 years Local Agency Bonds 5 years California Local Agency Obligations 5 years Commercial Paper 270 days Certificates of Deposit 5 years Negotiable Certificates of Deposits 5 years Corporate Notes 5 years Investment Pools (Riverside County Pool) N/A Money Market Mutual Funds N/A Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) N/A Investment Agreements 92 days Investments Authorized by the City Section 115 Trust Maximum Percentage Maximum Allowed Investment N/A N/A N/A 20 million N/A N/A N/A N/A 25% 10% of any outstanding issue 30% 250,000 30% 250,000 30% 5 million N/A N/A 20% 10% of City funds N/A LAIF Limit 20% N/A Investments of the Trust are governed by the provisions of the City of La Quinta Section 115 Trust Agreement, rather than the general provisions of the California Government Code or the City's investment policy. Investments authorized for funds held in the Section 115 Trust include Equity and Fixed Income Mutual Funds. The strategic range allowed for Equity and Fixed Income Mutual Funds is 20%-40% and 50%-80%, respectively. There are no limitations on the maximum amount that can be invested in one issuer or the maximum maturity of an investments. Disclosures Relating to Interest Rate Risk Interest rate risk is the risk that changes in market interest rates will adversely affect the fair value of an investment. Generally, the longer the maturity of an investment, the greater the sensitivity of its fair value to changes in market interest rates. One of the ways that the City manages its exposure to interest rate risk is by purchasing a combination of short term and long-term investments and by timing cash flows from maturities so that a portion of the portfolio is maturing or coming close to maturity evenly over time as necessary to provide the cash flow and liquidity needed for operations. 44 298 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Information about the sensitivity of the fair values of the City's investments (including investments held by bond trustee) to market interest rate fluctuations is provided by the following table that shows the distribution of the City's investments by maturity: Investment Type Certificates of Deposit Federal agency securities Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal National Mortgage Association Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp Federal Home Loan Bank U.S. Treasury Notes Corporate Notes Local Agency Investment Fund CAMP Riverside County Pool Section 115 Trust Equity Mutual Funds Fixed Income Mutual Funds Held by Fiscal Agent Money Market Mutual Funds Total Disclosures Relating to Credit Risk Remaining Maturitv fin Years 1 year Total Or Less 1 to 3 years 3 to 5 years $ 37,410,002 $ 8,717,090 $ 14,241,426 $ 14,451,486 15,091,193 3,196,153 3,774,480 8,120,560 10,480,400 2,983,260 7,497,140 - 6,770,671 - 4,465,036 2,305,635 13,430,583 1,481,695 5,771,560 6,177,328 56,460,543 32,023,160 9,901,508 14,535,875 1,811,650 398,820 446,340 966,490 35,567,034 35,567,034 - - 49,242,190 49,242,190 - - 11,986,970 11,986,970 - - 1,565,315 1,565,315 - - 3,498,569 3,498,569 - - 1,549 1,549 - - $ 243,316,669 $ 150,661,805 $ 46,097,490 $ 46,557,374 Generally, credit risk is the risk that an issuer of an investment will not fulfill its obligation to the holder of the investment. This is measured by the assignment of a rating by a nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The City's investment policy limits investments in commercial paper and money market mutual funds to those rated the highest rating as rated by Moody's or Standard and Poor's (S&P). Presented below are the S&P ratings as of year-end: Investment Type Federal Agency Securities Corporate Notes CAMP Total Exempt from Credit Risk disclosure: U.S. Treasury Notes Not rated: Certificates of Deposit Local Agency Investment Pool Riverside County Pool Section 115 Trust: Equity Mutual Funds Fixed Income Mutual Funds Held by Fiscal Agent: Money Market Mutual Funds Total investments Total AAA AA+ AA AA- 45,772,847 $ - $ 45,772,847 $ - $ 1,811,650 845,160 - 966,490 49,242,190 49,242,190 - - 96,826,687 $ 50,087,350 $ 45,772,847 $ 966,490 $ 56,460,543 37,410,002 35,567,034 11,986,970 1,565,315 3,498,569 1,549 $ 243,316,669 45 299 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Concentration of Credit Risk Investments in any one issuer that represent 5 percent or more of total City's investments are as follows: Issuer Federal Farm Credit Bank Federal Home Loan Bank Custodial Credit Risk Investment Type Federal Agency Securities Federal Agency Securities Reported Percent of Amount Portfolio $ 15,091,193 6% 13,430,583 6% Custodial credit risk for deposits is the risk that, in the event of the failure of a depository financial institution, a government will not be able to recover its deposits or will not be able to recover collateral securities that are in the possession of an outside party. The custodial credit risk for investments is the risk that, in the event of the failure of the counterparty (e.g., broker -dealer) to a transaction, a government will not be able to recover the value of its investment or collateral securities that are in the possession of another party. The City utilizes delivery versus payment for investment purchases, which requires investments to be received prior to delivery of cash payment. The California Government Code and the City's investment policy do not contain legal or policy requirements that would limit the exposure to custodial credit risk for deposits or investments, other than the following provision for deposits: The California Government Code requires that a financial institution secure deposits made by state or local governmental units by pledging securities in an undivided collateral pool held by a depository regulated under state law (unless so waived by the governmental unit). The market value of the pledged securities in the collateral pool must equal at least 110 percent of the total amount deposited by the public agencies. California law also allows financial institutions to secure City deposits by pledging first trust deed mortgage notes having a value of 150 percent of the secured public deposits, or by letters of credit issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco having a value of 105 percent of the secured public deposits. As a public funds depository Bank of the West maintains a public funds deposit collateral ization program that is designed to comply with all applicable statutes and regulations governing public funds deposits, including pledge and perfection of collateral. Accounts holding public funds are labeled as such and trigger collateralization. Collateral needs are met based on the prior day close of business. However, same -day collateral requests may be accommodated upon request. Investment in Riverside County Pool The City is a voluntary participant in the Riverside County Pooled Investment Fund that is regulated by California Government Code Section 53646 and managed by the Riverside County Treasurer. The City's investment in this pool is reported in the accompanying financial statements of net position and prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Investments are reported at fair value. The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by the County. The Riverside County Pooled Investment Fund is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not rated. 46 300 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Investment in State Investment Pool The City is a voluntary participant in the Local Agency Investment Fund (LAIF) that is regulated by the California Government Code under the oversight of the Treasurer of the State of California. The fair value of the City's investment in this pool is reported in the accompanying financial statements at amounts based upon the City's pro-rata share of the fair value provided by LAIF for the entire LAIF portfolio (in relations to the amortized cost of that portfolio). The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by LAIF, which are recorded on an amortized cost basis. Deposits and withdrawals are made on the basis of $1 and not fair value. Accordingly, the City's measurement of fair value of its investment with LAIF is based on uncategorized inputs, not defined as a level 1, level 2, or level 3 input. LAIF is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not rated. Investment in California Asset Management Program The City is a voluntary participant in the California Asset Management Program (CAMP) that is regulated by the California Government Code Section 53601 (p) and managed by a Board of Trustees comprised of finance directors and treasurers of California public agencies that are members of the Joint Powers Authority. The City's investment in this pool is reported in the accompanying financial statements of net position and prepared using the accrual basis of accounting. Investments are reported at fair value. The balance available for withdrawal is based on the accounting records maintained by CAMP. CAMP is not registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Fair Value Measurements The City categorizes its fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy established by generally accepted accounting principles. The hierarchy is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are significant other observable inputs; Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs. Investments categorized as Level 2 are valued using the market approach and quoted market prices. 47 301 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements The City has the following recurring fair value measurements as of June 30, 2023: Investments U.S. Treasury Notes Federal Agency Securities Corporate Notes Certificates of Deposit Section 115 Trust Equity Mutual Funds Fixed Income Mutual Funds June 30, 2023 Total Level 1 Level 2 $ 56,460,543 $ 56,460,543 45,772,847 - 1,811,650 - 37,410,002 - 1,565,315 1,565,315 3,498,569 3,498,569 Total leveled investments 146,518,926 Investments with uncategorized inputs Local Agency Investment Fund 35,567,034 CAMP 49, 242,190 Riverside County Pool 11,986,970 Held by Fiscal Agent Money Market Mutual Funds 1,549 Total investments $ 243,316,669 Note 3 - Notes Receivable 45,772,847 1,811,650 37,410,002 $ 61,524,427 $ 84,994,499 In September 1994, the former redevelopment agency sold certain real property to LINC Housing for $2,112,847. The property was used to construct single-family homes and rental units to increase the City's supply of low- and moderate -income housing. The note bears interest at 6 percent per annum and is due in full on June 15, 2029. On February 1, 2012, this receivable was transferred to the Housing Authority, which took over the housing function of the former redevelopment agency upon dissolution. As of June 30, 2023, the outstanding principal balance is $2,035,388 and the outstanding interest is $3,376,529. In February 2011, the former redevelopment agency entered into Disposition and Development Agreement with Coral Mountain Partners L.P. ("Coral Mountain") to fund up to $29,000,000 for the construction of a low- and moderate -income apartment complex with an estimated completion date of the apartment complex of March 2014. The former redevelopment agency's $29,000,000 loan is evidenced by a Promissory Note executed by Coral Mountain ("Note"). Interest on the outstanding note amount will bear simple interest of 1 percent. Principal and interest will be repaid on or before May 1st of each year from annual residual receipts as defined in the Note once the project is completed and may be repaid early if the property is refinanced, or if the property is transferred to another entity. On February 1, 2012, this receivable was transferred to the Housing Authority which took over the housing function of the former redevelopment agency upon dissolution. As of June 30, 2023, the outstanding principal balance is $20,437,816 and the outstanding interest balance is $1, 981, 691. Other notes receivable as of February 1, 2012, included in the Housing Authority which took over the housing function of the former redevelopment agency upon dissolution totaled $21,297 and the outstanding interest balance is $13,902 at June 30, 2023. 48 302 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Note 4 - Capital Assets Capital asset activity for governmental activities for the year ended June 30, 2023, is as follows: Governmental activities Capital assets, not being depreciated Land Right of way Construction -in -progress Total capital assets, not being depreciated Capital assets, being depreciated Buildings and improvements Equipment and furniture Vehicles Infrastructure Total capital assets, being depreciated Less accumulated depreciation for Buildings and improvements Equipment and furniture Vehicles Infrastructure Total accumulated depreciation Total capital assets, being depreciated, net Right to use lease assets, being amortized Building Equipment Vehicles Total right to use lease assets, being amortized Less Accumulated Amortization for Building Equipment Vehicles Total Accumulated amortization Total right to use lease assets, being amortized, net Right to use subscription IT assets, being amortized Less accumulated amortization Net right to use subscription IT assets Total Governmental Activitites Balance at July 01, 2022 As Restated Additions $ 81,790,496 $ 1,087,236 $ 285,857,353 - 17,119,485 8,132,282 384,767,334 9,219,518 Balance at Deletions Transfers June 30, 2023 $ 840,000 83,717,732 216,995 286,074,348 (16,988,760) 8,263,007 (15,931,765) 378,055,087 78,616,231 207,433 35,056 2,624,883 81,413,491 3,302,956 254,824 - 44,601 3,602,381 1,905,669 680,642 320,216 - 2,266,095 255,013,181 48,220 - 13,262,281 268,323,682 338,838,037 1,191,119 355,272 15,931,765 355,605,649 42,412,605 2,666,228 20,157 45,058,676 2,175,102 279,542 - 2,454,644 988,347 316,408 320,216 984,539 145,982,598 6,645,150 - 152,627,748 191,558,652 9,907,328 340,373 201,125,607 147,279,385 (8,716,209) 14,899 15,931,765 154,480,042 78,226 - - 78,226 38,118 - 38,118 179,597 57,639 121,958 295,941 57,639 238,302 33,681 33,682 67,363 10,791 10,791 - 21,582 93,984 63,369 57,639 99,714 138,456 107,842 57,639 188,659 157,485 (107,842) 49,643 945,351 116,430 1,061,781 - 469,460 469,460 945,351 (353,030) 592,321 $ 533,149,555 $ 42,437 $ 14,899 $ $ 533,177,093 49 303 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Depreciation and amortization expense was charged to the following functions in the Statement of Activities: General governments $ 481,271 Planning and development 24,630 Community services 1,543,484 Public works 6,876,694 Internal service funds 1,558,551 $ 10,484,630 Capital asset activity for business -type activities for the year ended June 30, 2023, is as follows: Balance at Balance at July 01, 2022 Additions Deletions June 30, 2023 Business -Type activities Capital assets, not being depreciated Land $ 39,712,956 $ - $ - $ 39,712,956 Capital assets, being depreciated Buildings and improvements 6,636,465 - - 6,636,465 Equipment and furniture 1,670,293 - - 1,670,293 Software 20,255 - - 20,255 Total capital assets, being depreciated 8,327,013 - - 8,327,013 Less accumulated depreciation for Buildings and improvements 3,937,825 214,545 - 4,152,370 Equipment and furniture 1,588,066 32,317 - 1,620,383 Software 20,255 - - 20,255 Total accumulated depreciation 5,546,146 246,862 - 5,793,008 Total capital assets, being depreciated, net 2,780,867 (246,862) - 2,534,005 Right to use lease assets, being amortized Equipment 796,621 - - 796,621 Less Accumulated Amortization for Equipment 232,843 252,693 - 485,536 Total right to use lease assets, being amortized, net 563,778 (252,693) - 311,085 Total Business -Type Activities $ 43,057,601 $ (499,555) $ - $ 42,558,046 Depreciation and amortization expense was charged to the following functions in the Statement of Activities: Golf Course 499.555 50 304 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Note 5 - Changes in Long -Term Liabilities The following is a summary of changes in governmental long-term liabilities of the City for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023: Balance at July 01, 2022 Balance as, restated Additions Deletions June 30, 2023 Governmental Activities Due within One year Compensated absences payable $ 962,229 $ 1,154,091 $ 962,230 $ 1,154,090 $ 299,718 Leases 162,648 - 109,537 53,111 42,189 Financed purchases 22,079 - 21,528 551 551 Subscription IT liabilities 810,483 116,430 431,239 495,674 352,117 $ 1,957,439 $ 1,270,521 $ 1,524,534 $ 1,703,426 $ 694,575 Compensated absences have been typically liquidated from the General Fund. Leases The City has entered into multiple lease agreements for buildings, vehicles, and equipment. The City is required to make principal and interest payments through 2025. The lease agreements have interest rates between 1.5% to 4% based on the City's estimated incremental borrowing rate at the inception of the lease. As of June 30, 2023, the net right to use asset balance is $49,643 and the lease liability balance is $53,111. The current year amortization and interest expense associated with the lease activities was $107,841 and $1,773. Remaining principal and interest payments on the leases are as follows: Financed Purchases Year Ending June 30, Principal Interest 2024 $ 42,189 $ 506 2025 10,922 78 $ 53,111 $ 584 The City has entered into agreements for the purchase of copiers purchased under financing leases. Such leases require annual payments of principal and interest, with interest rates ranging from 8.47% to 9.5%, and will be fully amortized by the year 2024. Payments under financed purchases at June 30, 2023 are: Year Ending June 30, 2024 Principal $ 551 $ 551 Interest 51 305 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Subscription IT Liabilities The City has entered into several Subscription -Based Information Technology Arrangements (SBITAs) for virtual permitting software, employee hiring subscription, website design & implementation software, HR and finance software, and Microsoft office software. The City is required to make principal and interest payments through June 2027. The subscription liability was valued using discount rates between 3.87% and 4.14% based on the City incremental borrowing rate at the inception of the subscriptions. Principal and interest payments on the SBITAs are as follows: Year Ending June 30, 2024 2025 2026 2027 Principal $ 352,117 55,248 43,292 45,017 Interest $ 10,759 4,783 3,109 1,369 $ 495,674 $ 20,020 The following is a summary of changes in business -type activities long-term liabilities of the City for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023: Balance at July 01, 2021 Additions Deletions Balance Due within June 30, 2023 One year Business- Type Activities Leases $ 565,837 $ - $ 250,317 $ 315,520 $ 191,659 The City Golf Course fund has entered into multiple lease agreements for equipment. The City is required to make principal and interest payments through 2027. The lease agreements have interest rates between 1.5% to 4% based on the City's estimated incremental borrowing rate at the inception of the lease. As of June 30, 2023, the net right to use asset balance is $311,085 and the lease liability balance is $315,520. The current year amortization and interest expense associated with the lease activities was $252,693 and $11,288. Remaining principal and interest payments on the leases are as follows: Year Ending June 30, 2024 2025 2026 2027 Principal $ 191,659 72,564 32,029 19,268 $ 315,520 Interest $ 6,396 2,820 1,416 241 $ 10,873 52 306 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Note 6 - Leases- Lessor Activities The City has accrued a receivable for three land leases. The remaining receivable for these leases was $1,432,355 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Deferred inflows related to these leases were $1,351,619 as of June 30, 2023. Interest revenue recognized on these leases was $45,221 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Principal receipts of $91,350 were recognized during the fiscal year. The interest rate on the leases was 3 percent. Final receipt is expected in fiscal year 2043. Year Ending June 30, Principal 2024 $ 98,239 2025 105,698 2026 113,403 2027 121,480 2028 129,867 2029 - 2033 404,921 2034 - 2038 192,164 2039 - 2043 266,583 $ 1,432,355 Note 7 - Interfund Receivables and Payables Interest $ 42,419 39,168 35,799 32,187 28,397 90,434 56,133 21,158 $ 345,695 The composition of current interfund receivable and payable balances is as follows: Due from Other Funds General Fund Due to Other Funds Non -Major Governmental Interfund balances reflect short term borrowings for deficit cash balances at June 30, 2023. $ 2,796,975 53 307 Note 8 - Interfund Transfers Transfers In Capital Improvements Fund Non -major Governmental Funds Golf Course Fund Total City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements Transfer Out Non -Major General Fund Governmental $ 4,187,642 $ 3,739,908 2,152,000 - 600,000 - $ 6,939,642 3,739,908 June 30, 2023 Total $ 7,927,550 2,152,000 600,000 $ 10,679,550 a. $4,187,642 was transferred from the General Fund to the Capital Improvement Fund to fund various capital projects. b. $3,739,908 was transferred to the Capital Improvement Fund from various non -major funds to fund various capital projects. c. $2,152,000 was transferred from the General Fund to various non -major funds to support various administrative operations and expenses within the City. d. $600,000 was transferred from the General Fund to the Golf Course Fund to subsidize operations. Note 9 - Defined Benefit Pension Plan Miscellaneous Plan Plan Description All qualified employees are eligible to participate in the City's Miscellaneous Employee Pension Plan, a cost - sharing multiple -employer defined benefit pension plans administered by the California Public Employees' Retirement System (CaIPERS). Benefit provisions under these plans are established by State statute and City resolution. CalPERS issues publicly available reports that include a full description of the pension plans regarding benefit provision, assumption and membership information. Copies of the report can be found on the CalPERS website. Benefits Provided CaIPERS provides service retirement and disability benefits, annual cost of living adjustments and death benefits to plan members, who must be public employees and beneficiaries. Benefits are based on years of credited service, equal to one year of full-time employment. Members with five years of total service are eligible to retire at age 50 with statutorily reduced benefits. All members are eligible for non -duty disability benefits after 10 years of service. The death benefit is one of the following: The Basic Death Benefit, the 1959 Survivor Benefit, or the Optional Settlement 2W Death Benefit. The cost -of -living adjustments for each plan are applied as specified by the Public Employees' Retirement Law. The Plan's provisions and benefits in effect at June 30, 2023 are summarized as follows: 54 308 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Tier I Tier II PEPRA Before On or After On or After Hire date November 1, 2012 November 1, 2012 January 1, 2013 Benefit formula 2.5% @55 2% @60 2% @62 Benefit vesting schedule 5 years service 5 years service 5 years service Benefit payments monthly for life monthly for life monthly for life Retirement age 50 and up 50 and up 52 and up Monthly benefits, as a % of eligible compensation 2% to 2.5% 2% to 2.5% 1% to 2% Required employee contribution rates 8.00% 7.00% 6.75% Required employer contribution rates 12.200% 8.650% 7.590% Contributions Section 20814(c) of the California Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) requires that the employer contribution rates for all public employers be determined on an annual basis by the actuary and shall be effective on the July 1 following notice of a change in the rate. Funding contributions are determined annually on an actuarial basis as of June 30th by CAPERS. The actuarially determined rate is the estimated amount necessary to finance the costs of benefits earned by employees during the year, and any unfunded accrued liability. The employer is required to contribute the difference between the actuarially determined rate and the contribution rate of employees. Employer contributions to the pension plan were $13,089,144 for the year ended June 30, 2023. Pension Liabilities, Pension Expense and Deferred Outflows and Deferred Inflows of Resources Related to Pensions As of June 30, 2023, the City reported a liability of $13,550,553 for its proportionate share of the collective net pension liability. The net pension liability was measured as of June 30, 2022, and the total pension liability used to calculate the net pension liability was determined by an actuarial valuation as of June 30, 2021.The City's proportion of the collective net pension liability was based on a projection of the City's long-term share of contributions to the pension plan relative to the projected contributions of all participating employers, actuarially determined. The City's proportion of the collective net pension liability as of June 30, 2022 and 2023 is as follows: Proportion- June 30, 2022 0.14222 Proportion- June 30, 2023 0.28959 Change- Increase (Decrease) 0.14737 For the year ended June 30, 2023, the City recognized pension expense of $1,562,261. 55 309 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 At June 30, 2023, the City reported deferred outflows and deferred inflows of resources related to pensions as follows: Pension contributions subsequent to measurement date Changes in assumptions Differences between expected and actual experience Net difference between projected and actual earnings on pension plan investments Change in employer's proportion Difference between the city's contribution and proportionate share of contributions Total Deferred Outflows Deferred Inflows of Resources of Resources 13,089,144 $ - 1,388,537 - 272,122 182,255 2,482,101 - 60,959 3,044,268 1,956,714 58,124 19,249,577 $ 3,284,647 The $13,089,144 reported as deferred outflows of resources resulting from contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net pension liability in the year ended June 30, 2024. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows or deferred inflows of resources related to pensions will be recognized as pension expense as follows: Year Ended June 30, 2024 $ 603,470 2025 496,676 2026 257,503 2027 1,518,137 Total $ 2,875,786 Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Used to Determine Total Pension Liability For the measurement period ended June 30, 2022 (the measurement date), the total pension liability was determined by rolling forward the June 30, 2021 total pension liability. The total pension liability in the June 30, 2021 actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial methods and assumptions: Valuation Date Measurement Date Actuarial Cost Method Discount Rate Inflation Projected Salary Increase Mortality Rate Table Post -retirement benefit increase Miscellaneous June 30, 2021 June 30, 2022 Entry -Age Normal Cost Method 6.90% 2.30% Varies by Entry Age and Service Derived using CaIPERS' Membership Data for all Fund Contract COLA up to 2.30% until Purchasing Power Protection Allowance Floor on Purchasing Power applies 56 310 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Changes of Assumptions The Board of Directors for Ca1PERS approved a change in the discount rate from 7.15% to 6.90% and a change in the inflation rate from 2.50% to 2.30% during measurement year ended June 30, 2022. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total pension liability was 6.90 percent. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that employee contributions will be made at the current contribution rate and that the City's contributions will be made at rates equal to the difference between actuarially determined contributions rates and the employee rate. Based on those assumptions, each pension plan's fiduciary net position was projected to be available to make all projected future benefit payments of current active and inactive employees. Therefore, the long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was applied to all periods of projected benefit payments to determine the total pension liability. In determining the long-term expected rate of return, CalPERS took into account long-term market return expectations as well as the expected pension fund cash flows. Projected returns for all asset classes are estimated and, combined with risk estimates, are used to project compound (geometric) returns over the long term. The discount rate used to discount liabilities was informed by the long-term projected portfolio return. These geometric rates of return are summarized in the following table: Asset Class Strategic Allocation Real Return Global equity - cap -weighted 30.00% 4.45% Global equity - non -cap -weighted 12.00% 3.84% Private equity 13.00% 7.28% Treasury 5.00% 0.27% Mortgage -backed Securities 5.00% 0.50% Investment Grade Corporates 10.00% 1.56% High Yield 5.00% 2.27% Emergind Market Debt 5.00% 2.48% Private Debt 5.00% 3.57% Real Assets 15.00% 3.21% Leverage -5.00% -0.59% Total 100 % 57 311 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Sensitivity of the Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate The following presents the City's proportionate share of the net position liability for each Plan, calculated using the discount rate for each Plan, as well as what the City's proportionate share of the net pension liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1 percent point lower or 1 percent higher than the current rate: Net Pension Liability Pension Plan Fiduciary Net Position Discount Rate - 1% (5.90%) $ 21,725,786 Current Discount Rate (6.90%) $ 13,550,553 Discount Rate +1% (7.90%) $ 6,824,364 Detailed information about the Plan's fiduciary net position is available in the separately issued CalPERS financial reports. Note 10 - Defined Contribution Plan Plan Description The Supplemental Pension Savings Plan is a defined contribution pension plan established by the City to provide retirement excess benefits to general employees of the City. At June 30, 2023, there was one plan member. There are no required contributions by plan members. During the 2022-2023 fiscal year the City made no contributions to fund the Supplemental Pension Savings Plan. Note 11- Other Post Employment Benefit Plan (OPEB) Plan Description The City's Retiree Health Plan is a single -employer defined benefit healthcare plan. The City contributes on behalf of all eligible retirees' $149/month for the calendar year 2022 and $151/month for calendar year 2023, increased in all future years according to the rate of medical inflation. These benefits are provided per contract between the City and the employee associations. A separate financial report is not available for the plan. The City participates in the California Employers' Retiree Benefit Trust (CERBT) for the purpose of accumulating funding for OPEB obligations. The CERBT is a Section 115 Trust and is an agent multiple employer plan for those electing to prefund OPEB obligations. 58 312 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Benefits Provided Retirees are eligible for medical benefits if they retire at age 50+, have 5+ years of service within CalPERS, and were enrolled in the CalPERS health system at retirement. The City provides PEMHCA minimum for each subscriber, regardless of elected coverage tier. Employees Covered by Benefit Terms At June 30, 2022, the most recent valuation date, the following current and former employees were covered by the benefit terms of the plan: Active employees Inactive employees or beneficiaries currently receiving benefits Tota I Contributions 97 23 120 The City makes contributions to the plan based on an actuarially determined rate. Employees are not required to contribute to the plan. For the year ended June 30, 2023, the City's cash contributions to the plan including the implied subsidy were $58,070. The City made no contributions to the CERBT trust. Net OPEB Liability/(Asset) Actuarial Assumptions — The net OPEB liability/(asset) in the June 30, 2022 actuarial valuation was determined using the following actuarial assumptions, applied to all periods included in the measurement: Actuarial Cost Method Actuarial Assumptions Discount Rate Inflation Investment Rate of Return Mortality Healthcare Trend Rate Entry -Age Normal Cost Method 5.50% 2.30% 5.50% (1) 6.5% for fiscal year 2023, gradually decreasing to an ultimate rate of 3.73% in fiscal year 2075. (1) Derived using CaIPERS Membership Data for all Funds Mortality rates were based on the CalPERS November 2021 Experience Study for Public Agency Miscellaneous Plans. 59 313 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Changes of Assumptions Healthcare trend rates were decreased from a rate of 6.7% decreasing gradually to an ultimate rate of 3.8% to 6.5% decreasing gradually to an ultimate rate of 3.73% for the valuation as of June 30, 2022. Discount Rate The discount rate used to measure the total OPEB liability was 5.50 percent for the Plan. The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed that the City contribution will be made at rates equal to the actuarially determined contribution rates. Changes in Net OPEB Liability: The changes in the net OPEB liability/(asset) for the Plan as of June 30, 2023 are as follows: Balance at June 30, 2022 Changes in the year Service cost Interest Differences between expected and actual experience Changes of assumptions Net investment income Employer contributions Benefit payments Administrative expense Net changes Balance at June 30, 2023 Total OPEB Plan Fiduciary Net OPEB Liability Net Position Liability/(Asset) $ 1,913,989 $ 2,051,400 $ (137,411) 85,049 - 85,049 107,396 - 107,396 (623,785) - (623,785) 26,883 - 26,883 - (257,883) 257,883 - 94,021 (94,021) (94,021) (94,021) - - (518) 518 (498,478) (258,401) (240,077) $ 1,415,511 $ 1,792,999 $ (377,488) Sensitivity of the Net OPEB Liability to Changes in the Discount Rate The following presents the net OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the City's net OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using a discount rate that is 1-percentage-point lower (4.50 percent) or 1-percentage-point higher (6.50 percent) than the current discount rate: Net OPEB Liability/(Asset) 1% Decrease (4.50%) $ (196,245) Discount Rate (5.50%) $ (377,488) 1% Increase (6.50%) $ (528,996) 60 314 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Sensitivity of the Net OPEB Liability to Changes in the Healthcare Cost Trend Rates The following presents the net OPEB liability of the City, as well as what the City's net OPEB liability would be if it were calculated using healthcare cost trend rates that are 1-percentage-point lower (5.5 percent decreasing to 2.7 percent) or 1-percentage-point higher (7.5 percent decreasing to 4.7 percent) than the current healthcare cost trend rates: 1% Decrease Current Trend Rate 1% Increase (5.5% decreasing (6.5% decreasing (7.5% decreasing to 2.7%) to 3.7%) to 4.7%) Net OPEB Liability/(Asset) $ (560,670) $ (377,488) $ (149,652) For the year ended June 30, 2023, the City recognized OPEB expense of $72,955. At June 30, 2023, the City reported deferred outflows of resources and deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB from the following sources: Deferred Outflows of Resources OPEB contributions subsequent to measurement date $ 58,070 Changes in assumptions 54,979 Difference between expected and actual liability 104,808 Net difference between projected and investment earnings 151,684 Total $ 369,541 Deferred Inflows of Resources 28,614 562,691 $ 591,305 The $58,070 reported as deferred outflows of resources related to OPEB resulting from City contributions subsequent to the measurement date will be recognized as a reduction of the net OPEB liability for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2024. Other amounts reported as deferred outflows or deferred inflows of resources related to OPEB will be recognized in as OPEB expense as follows: Year Ended June 30, 2024 $ (18,865) 2025 (15,755) 2026 (17,673) 2026 30,861 2027 (45,265) Thereafter (213,137) Total $ (279,834) 61 315 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Note 12 - Section 115 Trust In the fiscal year 2019, the City Council approved the creation of a Section 115 Trust Agreement with U.S Bank National Association, and Public Agency Retirement Services (PARS), Trust Administrator. The Section 115 Trust was established as a means to set aside monies to fund the City's pension and OPEB obligations. Contributions to the Section 115 Trust are irrevocable, the assets are dedicated to providing benefits to plan members, and the assets are protected from creditors of the City. The purpose of the creation of the section 115 Trust was to address the City's pension obligations by accumulating assets to reduce the net pension liability. However, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the assets in the Section 115 Trust are not considered to have present service capacity as plan assets and are therefore considered restricted assets of the City rather than pension plan assets. Accordingly, the Section 115 Trust's assets are recorded as restricted for pension benefits in the City's General Fund rather than assets of the pension plan during the measurement of the net pension liability. The assets held in trust will be considered pension plan assets at the time they are transferred out of the Trust into the pension plan. The balance in the Trust for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2023 was $5,317,487. The City currently funds its OPEB obligations through the CERBT program, and although the Section 115 Trust is able to accept OPEB funds, the City has no immediate plans to fund OPEB obligations through the Section 115 Trust. Note 13 - Risk Management Description of Self -Insurance Pool Pursuant to Joint Powers Agreement The City of La Quinta is a member of the California Joint Powers Insurance Authority (Authority). The Authority is composed of 124 California public entities and is organized under a joint powers' agreement pursuant to California Government Code §6500 et seq. The purpose of the Authority is to arrange and administer programs for the pooling of self -insured losses, to purchase excess insurance or reinsurance, and to arrange for group purchased insurance for property and other lines of coverage. The California JPIA began covering claims of its members in 1978. Each member government has an elected official as its representative on the Board of Directors. The Board operates through a nine -member Executive Committee. Self -Insurance Programs of the OPIA Each member pays an annual contribution at the beginning of the coverage period. A retrospective adjustment is then conducted annually thereafter, for coverage years 2012-13 and prior. Coverage years 2013-14 and forward are not subject to routine annual retrospective adjustment. The total funding requirement for self- insurance programs is based on actuarial analysis. Costs are allocated to individual agencies based on payroll and claims history, relative to other members of the risk -sharing pool. 62 316 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Primary Liability Program Claims are pooled separately between police and general government exposures. (1) The payroll of each member is evaluated relative to the payroll of other members. A variable credibility factor is determined for each member, which establishes the weight applied to payroll and the weight applied to losses within the formula. (2) The first layer of losses includes incurred costs up to $100,000 for each occurrence and is evaluated as a percentage of the pool's total incurred costs within the first layer. (3) The second layer of losses includes incurred costs from $100,000 to $500,000 for each occurrence and is evaluated as a percentage of the pool's total incurred costs within the second layer. (4) Incurred costs from $500,000 to $50 million, are distributed based on the outcome of cost allocation within the first and second loss layers. The overall coverage limit for each member, including all layers of coverage, is $50 million per occurrence. Subsidence losses also have a $50 million per occurrence limit. The coverage structure is composed of a combination of pooled self-insurance, reinsurance, and excess insurance. Workers' Compensation Claims are pooled separately between public safety (police and fire) and general government exposures. (1) The payroll of each member is evaluated relative to the payroll of other members. A variable credibility factor is determined for each member, which establishes the weight applied to payroll and the weight applied to losses within the formula. (2) The first layer of losses includes incurred costs up to $75,000 for each occurrence and is evaluated as a percentage of the pool's total incurred costs within the first layer. (3) The second layer of losses includes incurred costs from $75,000 to $200,000 for each occurrence and is evaluated as a percentage of the pool's total incurred costs within the second layer. (4) Incurred costs from $200,000 to statutory limits are distributed based on the outcome of cost allocation within the first and second loss layers. For 2020-21 the Authority's pooled retention is $1 million per occurrence, with reinsurance to statutory limits under California Workers' Compensation Law. Employer's Liability losses are pooled among members to $1 million. Coverage from $1 million to $5 million is purchased through reinsurance policies, and Employer's Liability losses from $5 million to $10 million are pooled among members. Purchased Insurance Property Insurance —The City of La Quinta participates in the all-risk property protection program of the CJPIA. This insurance protection is underwritten by several insurance companies. City of La Quinta property is currently insured according to a schedule of covered property submitted by the City of La Quinta to the CJPIA. City of La Quinta property currently has all-risk property insurance protection in the amount of $89,106,544. There is a $10,000 deductible per occurrence except for non -emergency vehicle insurance which has a $2,500 deductible. Special Event Tenant User Liability Insurance — The City of La Quinta further protects against liability damages by requiring tenant users of certain property to purchase low-cost tenant user liability insurance for certain activities on agency property. The insurance premium is paid by the tenant user and is paid to the City of La Quinta according to a schedule. The City of La Quinta then pays for the insurance. The insurance is facilitated by the Authority. 63 317 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Earthquake and Flood Insurance — The City of La Quinta purchases earthquake and flood insurance on a portion of its property. The earthquake insurance is part of the property protection insurance program of the Authority. The coverage will not pay for loss or damage caused by "earthquake shock" until the amount of loss or damage exceeds 5% per unit of coverage subject to a minimum deductible of $100,000 per occurrence. Crime Insurance — The City of La Quinta purchases crime insurance coverage from Alliant Insurance Services. The policy covers theft, forgery, identity fraud, computer crime, and monetary fraud with a single loss limit of $1,000,000 and a deductible of $5,000 per occurrence. Cyber Incident Insurance — The City of La Quinta purchases Cyber Incident Response insurance coverage through the Authority. The maximum single limit of insurance is $1,000,000. Adequacy of Protection During the past three fiscal years, none of the above programs of protection experienced settlements or judgments that exceeded pooled or insured coverage. There were also no significant reductions in pooled or insured liability coverage in 2022-2023. Note 14 - Fund Balance Fund Balance Commitments In the governmental fund financial statements, committed reserves include: Natural Disaster Emergency Reserves: These funds may be utilized for the preparation, recovery, and restoration of services before, during and/or after a natural disaster (such as flood, earthquake, etc.) as defined by City Code 2.20.020. The target is $15,000,000 and will be reviewed every five years by conducting a risk analysis of all City assets, insurance levels, and potential federal/state contributions towards disaster recovery efforts. For the year ended June 30, 2023, the City has committed $15,000,000 for this purpose. Economic Downturn Reserves: These funds may be used in such instances as a declared national, state, or regional recession; loss of a major (top 10) revenue -generating business; or a natural disaster resulting in a significant decline in revenues. These reserves may also be used if overall revenues decrease, or expenditures increase more than 10% of the previous year's actual revenues or expenditures. The target of $13,000,000, was based on a long-term analysis of the revenue and expenditure flows (which included the financial impacts of the Great Recession, the loss of Redevelopment Agencies, and the COVID-19 pandemic) as well as the application of the Consumer Price Index (CPI) increases to the original base target. 64 318 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Cash Flow Reserves: These funds are maintained to have adequate cash on hand to account for the uneven receipt of revenue. For example, property tax accounts for a large percentage of annual revenue, the bulk of which is not remitted until December and May of each year. The target for the Cash Flow Reserves is 10% of each year's revenue budget, or a minimum of $5,000,000. The cash flow reserve is fully funded as of June 30, 2023. Capital Improvement Reserves: These funds may be used for capital assets and infrastructure rehabilitation, improvement, and replacement. The target of $12,000,000 is based on annual depreciation of assets and may be adjusted by the Consumer Price Index (CPI). For the year ended June 30, 2023, the City has committed $12,000,000. Carryovers: These funds are items appropriated in a prior fiscal year that have yet to be spent. Carryovers committed to Fiscal Year 2022-2023 totaled $2,600,009 at June 30, 2023. Assigned Fund Balance The City has the following assigned fund balance shown on the balance sheet: Assigned to public safety represents property tax accumulated and withheld by the County of Riverside to be used for fire protection, disaster preparedness, fire prevention, rescue, hazardous materials mitigation, technical rescue response, medical emergency services, and public service assists. The assigned fund balance related to this item as of June 30, 2023 is $11,986,970. Assigned to capital projects is comprised of carryover balances for capital projects. The capital project carryover balances as of June 30, 2023 are $22,623,372. Accumulated resources related to the City's sales tax Measure G is $29,214,191 as of June 30, 2023. Deficit Fund Balance At June 30, 2023, the following funds had deficit fund balances: Major Capital Projects Fund Capital Improvement (6,099,608) Nonmajor Special Revenue Funds Quimby (735,460) Housing Grant (60,267) Nonmajor Capital Projects Fund Library Development (1,118,627) 65 319 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Note 15 - Golf Course Management Agreement The City entered into an agreement with Landmark Golf Management LLC (operator) to manage the golf operations at the city -owned SilverRock Golf Course. The Agreement entered into on April 6, 2004, sets forth a five-year term commencing upon the completion of the golf course. On January 14, 2005, the golf course was deemed to be complete, and management was turned over to the operator. The contract has been amended and extended numerous times with the current contract expiring June 30, 2023. The contract provides that the operator will manage the day-to-day operations, hire employees, provide golf pro shop and food services, manage all marketing and promotional activities, prepare the annual budget report for Council consideration, and manage accounting and payroll functions. In addition to the annual payment for management services, the City has advanced the operator $250,000 to pay for golf course expenses. Twice a month the operator submits a request for reimbursement to the City to replenish the City's advance. In addition, the agreement sets forth the establishment of a capital reserve fund of 2 percent of green fees. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2023, the Golf Course had a loss before transfers of $719,763. Note 16 - Construction Commitments Various construction projects were in progress at June 30, 2023. Projects costs are paid out of the capital improvements fund. The following material construction commitments, for which funds have been encumbered, existed at June 30, 2023, with an estimated cost to complete. Project Name Project Number Contract Amount Expenditures to date as of June 30, 2023 Remaining Commitments Capital Improvement Fund Dune Palms Bridge Improvement 111205 $ 30,374,245 $ (7,218,082) $ 23,156,163 La Quinta X Park 151609 4,686,639 (4,504,148) 182,491 La Quinta Landscape Renovation Improvement 201603 9,963,148 (6,419,536) 3,543,612 Civic Center Campus Lake/Irrigation Conversion 201606 675,270 (153,754) 521,516 SilverRock Event Space 201608 7,304,503 (7,002,256) 302,247 Washington Street at Fred Waring Dr 201701 1,860,744 (1,739,921) 120,823 Ave 53 Jefferson St Roundabout 201709 3,281,617 (3,016,952) 264,665 Corporate Yard Admin Offices & Crew 201805 591,013 (55,772) 535,241 Village Art Plaza Promenade & Cultural Campus 201901 3,310,000 (182,469) 3,127,531 Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning The Evacuation Channel 201902 16,349,000 (22,064) 16,326,936 LQ Skate Park Conver to Other Activity 201903 263,000 (315) 262,685 Hwy 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation 201905 4,250,000 (749,921) 3,500,079 Citywide Catch Bsin Modification 201908 250,000 - 250,000 Avenue 48 Art and Music Line Project 202008 2,400,000 (129,359) 2,270,641 Dune Palms Rd Pavement Rehab -Fred 202101 1,021,100 (19,453) 1,001,647 Fritz Burns Park Improvements 202102 6,350,000 (84,032) 6,265,968 Avenue 50 Pavement Rehab ( Washington St) 202201 1,100,000 (15,562) 1,084,438 City Hall Capacity Improvements 202202 800,000 (75) 799,925 FredWring Drive Pavement Rehabilitation 202203 1,470,211 (14,262) 1,455,949 66 320 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Expenditures Project Contract to date as of Remaining Project Name Number Amount June 30, 2023 Commitments Sports Complex Lighting Replacement 202204 300,000 (26,050) 273,950 Avenue 50 Widening Improvements 202205 539,400 (2,525) 536,875 Village Utilities Underground Project 202206 124,315 (15,793) 108,522 Highway 111 at Jefferson Street Rehab 202207 541,432 (26,310) 515,122 ADA Transition Plan Update 202209 150,000 - 150,000 Moon River Drive Pavement Rehab 202210 400,000 (271,359) 128,641 Village Parking Lot 202211 500,000 - 500,000 Phase II Camera System 202212 1,797,000 - 1,797,000 Smart Infrastructure Improvements 202213 250,000 (350) 249,650 Ave 52 Pavement Rehabilitation 202214 500,000 (10,213) 489,787 Ave 58 Pavement Rehabilitation 202301 1,380,000 1,380,000 Avenue 52 Monroe Street 202302 150,000 150,000 Washington street sidewalk improvement 202303 478,000 478,000 Highway 111 Event Site 202304 500,000 - 500,000 X Park Pedestrian Signal 202305 250,000 - 250,000 La Quinta Parks Phase Sports Complex 202306 650,000 - 650,000 Citywide Miscellaneous ADA improvements 202307 136,300 - 136,300 X Park Building ADA Improvements 202308 350,000 350,000 Washington Street Connector 202309 1,200,000 1,200,000 Silverrock Dust Control Improvements 202310 1,000,000 1,000,000 Note 17 - Reimbursement Agreements On September 9, 2014, the City entered into a sales tax sharing agreement. Under the terms of the agreement the City shall make quarterly payments of 50 percent of any sales tax generated from the business in an amount not to exceed $400,000 over an eight -year period. Due to the reporting of sales tax information by the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration to the City, the reimbursement payments by the City will lag by one quarter. The agreement terminates when either the $400,000 limit is reached or in eight years whichever comes first. The business opened in December 2014. As of June 30, 2023, the City made $400,000 in reimbursement payments to the owner leaving an outstanding balance of $0. Note 18 - Adoption of New Standard and Correction of Error As of July 1, 2022, the City adopted GASB Statement No. 96, Subscription -Based Information Technology Arrangements (SBITAs). The implementation of this standard establishes that a SBITA results in a right to use subscription IT asset - an intangible asset - and a corresponding liability. The standard provides the capitalization criteria for outlays other than subscription payments, including implementation costs of a SBITA. The Statement requires recognition of certain SBITA assets and liabilities for SBITAs that previously were recognized as outflows of resources based on the payment provisions of the contract. Beginning net position and fund balance were restated to retroactively adopt the provisions of GASB Statement No. 96. As part of the restatement as a result of implementation of GASB 96, capital assets in the amount of $99,956 were written off. 67 321 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 As part of the current year's review of the activities of the Private -Purpose Trust Fund- Successor Agency of the Former RDA (PPTF), the City identified activities recorded in the PPTF that should have been recorded in the City's Housing Authority Fund. As a result, the PPTF and the Housing Authority's beginning net position/fund balance has been restated by $2,846,027. Additionally, in the prior years, the PPTF purchased land, a portion of which was not recorded in the PPTF ($5,813,436). In total, land in the amount of $14,444,476, is part of the Housing Authority and the PPTF and Governmental Activities beginning net position has been adjusted accordingly. The PPTF incorrectly recorded underwriters fees in the previous years. As a result, an adjustment in the amount of $1,216,538 was recorded to reduce beginning net position. Governmental Activities Information Governmental Technology Activities ISF Fund Private -Purpose Trust Fund Housing Successor Authority Agency of the Fund former RDA Net Position/Fund Balance at July 1, 2022, as previously reported $ 762,727,717 $ 2,480,617 $ 24,015,857 $ (156,242,158) Recognition of right to use subscription IT asset 945,351 945,351 Recognition of subscription IT liability (810,483) (810,483) Net write off of previously reported capital asset (99,956) (99,956) Recognition of Housing Authority land 14,444,476 - (8,631,040) Recognition of Housing Authority activities 2,846,027 2,846,027 (2,846,027) Correction to previously recorded underwriters fees - - (1,216,538) Net Position/Fund Balance at July 1, 2022, as restated $ 780,053,132 $ 2,515,529 $ 26,861,884 $ (168,935,763) The effect of the restatement to the June 30, 2022 change in net position/fund balance is as follows: Change in Net Position/Fund Balance, June 30, 2022, as previously reported Recognition of right to use subscription IT asset Recognition of subscription IT liability Net write off of previously reported capital asset Recognition of Housing Authority land Recognition of Housing Authority activities Correction to previously recorded underwriters fees Change in Net Position/Fund Balance June 30, 2022, as restated Governmental Activities Information Governmental Technology Activities ISF Fund Private -Purpose Trust Fund Housing Successor Authority Agency of the Fund former RDA $ 29,585,150 $ 307,693 $ 209,157 $ 16,385,791 945,351 945,351 - - (810,483) (810,483) (99,956) (99,956) 14,444,476 - (8,631,040) 2,846,027 2,846,027 (2,846,027) - - (1,216,538) $ 46,910,565 $ 342,605 $ 3,055,184 $ 3,692,186 68 322 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Note 19 - Successor Agency Trust for Assets of Former Redevelopment Agency On December 29, 2011, the California Supreme Court upheld Assembly Bill 1X 26 ("the Bill") that provides for the dissolution of all redevelopment agencies in the State of California. This action impacted the reporting entity of the City of La Quinta that previously had reported a redevelopment agency within the reporting entity of the City as a blended component unit. The Bill provides that upon dissolution of a redevelopment agency, either the city or another unit of local government will agree to serve as the "successor agency" to hold the assets until they are distributed to other units of state and local government. On January 3, 2012, the City Council elected to become the Successor Agency for the Former Redevelopment Agency ('Former Agency") in accordance with the Bill as part of City resolution number 2012-002. After enactment of the law, which occurred on June 28, 2011, redevelopment agencies in the State of California cannot enter into new projects, obligations or commitments. Subject to the control of a newly established oversight board, remaining assets can only be used to pay enforceable obligations in existence at the date of dissolution (including the completion of any unfinished projects that were subject to legally enforceable contractual commitments). In future fiscal years, successor agencies will only be allocated revenue in the amount that is necessary to pay the estimated annual installment payments on enforceable obligations of the Former Agency until all enforceable obligations of the prior redevelopment agency have been paid in full and all assets have been liquidated. In accordance with the timeline set forth in the Bill (as modified by the California Supreme Court on December 29, 2011) all redevelopment agencies in the State of California were dissolved and ceased to operate as a legal entity as of February 1, 2012. The Successor Agency to the Former Agency is reported as a fiduciary fund (private purpose trust fund). Cash and Investments Cash and investments reported in the accompanying financial statements consisted of the following: Cash and investments pooled with the City $ 15,570,390 Cash and investments with fiscal agent 1,549 $ 15,571,939 See note 2 for required cash and investments disclosures. 69 323 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Due from other Governments La Quinta Library In April 2005, an advance of $2,490,273 was made from the former redevelopment agency to provide funding for the construction of the public library. The loan accrues interest at the earnings rate of the City's investment pool fund. The remaining balance of this loan at June 30, 2023, is $1,118,627. Deferred Outflows of Resources As debt is refunded, the difference between the carrying value of the refunded debt and the reacquisition price is recorded as a deferred outflow of resources and amortized over the shorter of the new or refunded debt, whichever is shorter. Activity during the fiscal year is comprised of the following: Balance at Balance July 01, 2022 Additions Deductions June 30, 2023 Deferred charge on refunding $ 15,766,509 $ - $ 1,124,995 $ 14,641,514 Long -Term Debt A description of long-term debt outstanding of the Successor Agency as of June 30, 2023, follows: Tax allocation bonds City loans Unamortized premiums/ discounts Tota I 2016 Series A Restated Balance at July 01, 2022 Additions $ 174,310,000 $ - 27,394,184 476,491 (186,173) $ 201,518,011 $ Balance Due within Repayments June 30, 2023 One year $ 13,190,000 $ 161,120,000 $ 13,255,000 3,369,682 24,500,993 3,437,076 10,638 (175,535) 476,491 $ 16,570,320 $ 185,445,458 $ 16,692,076 On December 22, 2016, the La Quinta Redevelopment Project Areas No. 1 and 2 Subordinate Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds 2016 Taxable Series A Bonds were issued for $35,055,000 by the Successor Agency to the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency") to refinance on an advance basis the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency's (the "Prior Agency") previously issued $6,000,000 La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 2, Subordinate Taxable Tax Allocation Bonds, Series 2011 (the "2011 Project Area No. 2 Taxable Bonds") of which $5,810,000 was outstanding and the Prior Agency's loan obligation under the Loan Agreement, dated February 3, 2004 as supplemented by the Second Supplemental Loan Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2011 (the "2011 Loan Obligation") in connection with the La Quinta Financing Authority's previously issued $28,850,000 Local Agency Subordinate Taxable Revenue Bonds, 2011 Series A (the "2011 Taxable Housing Bonds") of which $26,635,000 was outstanding. 70 324 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 The Bonds were issued on a subordinate basis to the $65,600,000 Successor Agency to the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency, La Quinta Redevelopment Project Areas No. 1 and 2, Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds, 2014 Series. The Bonds are payable from and secured by the Pledged Tax Revenues, as defined herein, to be derived from the La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 1 and La Quinta Redevelopment Project Area No. 2. The principal of and interest on the Bonds are payable solely from the pledged tax revenues allocated to the Successor Agency from the project areas. The principal balance of outstanding bonds at June 30, 2023, is $26,555,000 with an unamortized discount of $175,534. The Bonds mature in 2040, but may be called before maturity and redeemed at the option of the Agency, in whole or in part, from the proceeds of refunding bonds or other available funds, on September 1, 2026 or on any date thereafter prior to maturity at a redemption price equal to the principal amount of Bonds to be redeemed, without premium, plus accrued interest to the redemption date. Year Ending June 30, Principal Interest Total 2024 $ 1,465,000 $ 1,035,479 $ 2,500,479 2025 1,510,000 988,315 2,498,315 2026 1,565,000 937,680 2,502,680 2027 1,620,000 882,845 2,502,845 2028 1,675,000 824,065 2,499,065 2029-2033 9,375,000 3,072,634 12,447,634 2034-2038 8,655,000 897,966 9,552,966 2039-2040 690,000 18,334 708,334 $ 26,555,000 $ 8,657,318 $ 35,212,318 2021 Series A On April 14, 2021, the Agency issued $156,915,000 in Series 2021 A Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds to refund the Series 2013 A and B and Series 2014 A Tax Allocation Bonds. The bonds are payable in annual installments ranging from $4,785,000 to $13,610,000 until maturity on September 1, 2034. Interest is payable semiannually on March 1 and September 1 of each year, at a rate of 2.774%. Bonds outstanding at June 30, 2023 were $134,565,000. The principal and interest on the bonds are payable solely from the pledged tax revenues allocated to the Successor Agency from the project areas. 71 325 Future debt service requirements on these bonds are as follows: Year Ending June 30, Principal 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029-2033 2034-2035 Loans from the City of La Quinta $ 11,790,000 11,845,000 11,920,000 12,060,000 12,240,000 65,005,000 9,705,000 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Interest $ 2,405,638 2,338,010 2,227,650 2,072,532 1,881,273 5,354,057 269,175 Total $ 14,195,638 14,183,010 14,147,650 14,132,532 14,121,273 70,359,057 9,974,175 $ 134,565,000 $ 16,548,335 $ 151,113,335 The City of La Quinta loaned money to the Former Agency to cover operating and capital shortfalls. In a letter dated November 6, 2013, the California Department of Finance approved the loans as enforceable obligations to be paid through Successor Agency property tax. This loan approved split between the City's General and the Housing Authority Funds. As of June 30, 2023, principal and capitalized interest due to the City of La Quinta was $24,500,993 and is included as part of the due from other governments balance in the City's General and the Housing Authority Funds. On November 22, 2017, the Department of Finance (DOF) approved the last and final Recognized Obligation Payment Schedules (ROPS). The ROPS is a comprehensive schedule which includes all bond debt service payments, City loan repayments, administration, and annual reporting requirements from fiscal years 2018-2019 to 2039-2040. Estimated future loan payment requirements on the City loan are as follows: Year Ending June 30, Principal Interest Total 2024 $ 3,437,076 $ - $ 3,437,076 2025 3,505,817 - 3,505,817 2026 3,575,934 - 3,575,934 2027 3,647,452 - 3,647,452 2028 3,720,401 - 3,720,401 2029-2030 6,614,313 - 61614,313 $ 24,500,993 $ $ 24,500,993 72 326 City of La Quinta, California Notes to Financial Statements June 30, 2023 Pledged Tax Revenues The City pledged, as security for bonds issued, either directly or through the Financing Authority, a portion of tax increment revenue (including Low and Moderate Income Housing set -aside and pass through allocations) that it receives. The bonds issued were to provide financing for various capital projects, accomplish Low and Moderate Income Housing projects and to defease previously issued bonds. Assembly Bill 1X 26 provided that upon dissolution of the Redevelopment Agency, property taxes allocated to redevelopment agencies no longer are deemed tax increment but rather property tax revenues and will be allocated first to successor agencies to make payments on the indebtedness incurred by the dissolved redevelopment agency. Total principal and interest remaining on the debt is $186,325,653 with annual debt service requirements as indicated above. For the current year, the total property tax revenue recognized by the Successor Agency for the payment of indebtedness incurred was $20,124,588 and the debt service obligation on the bonds was $16,271,464. Insurance The Successor Agency of the Former Agency is covered under the insurance policy of the City of La Quinta at June 30, 2023. 73 327 This page intentionally left blank. 328 Required Supplementary Information June 30, 2023 City of La Quinta, California 329 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule - General Fund Year Ended June 30, 2023 Variance with Budget Amounts Actual Final Budget Original Final Amounts Positive (Negative) Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 $ 165,907,013 $ 165,907,013 $ 165,907,013 $ - Resources (Inflows) Taxes 54,946,700 61,746,700 65,146,000 3,399,300 Licenses and permits 2,823,200 3,461,200 3,994,989 533,789 Intergovernmental 7,853,000 9,378,000 9,989,061 611,061 Charges for services 1,081,100 1,391,100 1,558,784 167,684 Use of money and property 555,000 2,855,000 2,388,981 (466,019) Fines and forfeitures 462,000 522,000 563,494 41,494 Miscellaneous 600,100 1,395,100 2,479,742 1,084,642 Transfer In - 5,000,000 - (5,000,000) Amounts available for appropriations 234,228,113 251,656,113 252,028,064 371,951 Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) General government Legislative 351,400 354,700 312,671 42,029 City manager 1,177,540 1,326,164 1,083,016 243,148 City attorney 796,000 796,000 358,188 437,812 Marketing 1,632,128 1,833, 378 1,648,064 185,314 Human resources 495,698 591,898 439,030 152,868 City clerk 1,257,526 1,264,079 996,957 267,122 Fiscal services 1,595,830 1,610,216 1,560,869 49,347 Central services 4,388,100 14,303,716 13,570,997 732,719 The Hub customer services 1,236,482 1,244,439 996,706 247,733 Public safety Police 18,185,900 18,246,900 16,165,493 2,081,407 Code compliance 1,663,996 1,677,746 1,571,807 105,939 Fire 8,836,872 8,838,622 7,625,126 1,213,496 Planning and development Current planning 744,830 749,304 652,601 96,703 Public buildings 1,390,052 1,553,936 1,504,048 49,888 Building & safety 1,291,362 1,457,240 1,375,536 81,704 Administration 756,824 775,228 771,529 3,699 Community services Community services admin 880,480 883,980 740,952 143,028 Wellness center 682,102 757,040 717,948 39,092 Recreation programs/special events 1,088,734 1,498,751 1,216,488 282,263 Park maintenance 3,042,072 3,207,347 3,107,294 100,053 See Note to Required Supplementary Information 73 330 Public works Administration Development services Maintenance/operations - street Engineering services Capital outlay Debt Service Principal Transfers out Total charges to appropriations Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — General Fund Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final Actual Amounts Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) $ 794,862 $ 800,848 $ 614,776 $ 186,072 512,960 514,551 413,090 101,461 754,768 773,415 474,366 299,049 1,020,756 1,248,656 646,511 602,145 35,000 961,000 536,087 424,913 - - 10,764 (10,764) 10,039,000 47,033,518 6,939,642 40,093,876 64,651,274 114,302,672 66,050,556 48,252,116 $ 169,576,839 $ 137,353,441 $ 185,977,508 $ 48,624,067 See Note to Required Supplementary Information 74 331 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Housing Authority Year Ended June 30, 2023 Variance with Final Budget Budget Amounts Actual Positive Original Final Amounts (Negative) Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1, as restated $ 26,861,884 $ 26,861,884 $ 26,861,884 $ - Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property 120,500 120,500 1,694,227 1,573,727 Extraordinary item 200,000 200,000 - (200,000) Miscellaneous 1,151,000 1,274,000 96,405 (1,177,595) Amounts available for appropriations 28,333,384 28,456,384 28,652,516 196,132 Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Planning and development 1,712,670 2,112,295 1,830,275 282,020 Community services 250,000 305,000 254,998 50,002 Capital Outlay - - 201,409 (201,409) Total charges to appropriations 1,962,670 2,417,295 2,286,682 130,613 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 26,370,714 $ 26,039,089 $ 26,365,834 $ 326,745 See Note to Required Supplementary Information 75 332 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property Miscellaneous revenue Amounts available for appropriations Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Disaster Recovery Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ (97,108) $ (97,108) Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) $ (97,108) $ - 10,000 10,000 46,930 36,930 4,993,505 4,993,505 - (4,993,505) 4,906,397 4,906,397 (50,178) (4,956,575) $ 4,906,397 $ 4,906,397 $ (50,178) $ (4,956,575) See Note to Required Supplementary Information 76 333 City of La Quinta, California Schedule of Proportionate Share of the Net Pension Liability — Miscellaneous Plan Last 10 Years* 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Proportion of the net pension liability 0.1034% 0.1260% 0.1257% 0.1272% 0.1287% 0.13134% 0.13329% 0.14222% 0.28959% Proportionate share of the net pension liability $ 6,433,391 $ 8,651,290 $ 10,874,098 $ 12,612,523 $ 12,403,691 $ 13,458,200 $ 14,502,311 $ 7,691,773 $ 13,550,553 Covered payroll $ 5,421,945 $ 5,480,758 $ 5,569,002 $ 5,739,416 $ 6,064,875 $ 6,669,204 $ 7,066,830 $ 6,238,425 $ 6,223,072 Proportionate share of the net pension liability as a percentage of covered payroll 118.65% 157.85% 195.26% 219.75% 204.52% 201.80% 205.22% 123.30% 217.75% Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability 79.82% 78.40% 74.06% 73.31% 75.30% 77.73% 77.71% 90.60% 90.60% * - Fiscal year 2015 was the first year of implementation, therefore, only nine years are shown. Changes in Assumptions The discount rate changed from 7.65 percent used for the June 30, 2016 measurement date to 7.15 percent used for the June 30, 2017 measurement date. The discount rate changed from 7.15 percent used for the June 30, 2021 measurement date to 6.90 percent used for the June 30, 2022 measurement date. The inflation rate changed from 2.50 percent used for the June 30, 2021 measurement date to 2.30 percent used for the June 30, 2022 measurement date. Covered Payroll In accordance with GASB Statement No. 82, Pension Issues - An Amendment of GASB Statement No. 67, No. 68, and No. 73, we have restated to show covered payroll based on pensionable earnings. 77 334 City of La Quinta, California Schedule of Pension Plan Contributions — Miscellaneous Plan Last 10 Years* 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Actuarially determined contributions - miscellaneous $ 728,073 $ 797,603 $ 949,231 $ 1,061,439 $ 1,284,275 $ 1,479,137 $ 2,581,158 $ 4,650,357 $ 1,920,092 Contributions in relation to the actuarially determined contribution (728,073) (797,603) (949,231) (1,061,439) (1,284,275) (1,479,137) (2,581,158) (4,650,357) (13,089,144) Contribution deficiency (excess) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $(11,169,052) Covered payroll $ 5,480,758 $ 5,569,002 $ 5,739,416 $ 6,064,875 $ 6,669,204 $ 7,066,830 $ 6,238,425 $ 6,223,072 $ 6,682,312 Contributions as a percentage of covered payroll 13.28% 14.32% 16.54% 17.50% 19.26% 20.93% 41.38% 74.73% 195.88% * - Fiscal year 2015 was the first year of implementation, therefore, only nine years are shown. Covered Payroll In accordance with GASB Statement No. 82, Pension Issues - An Amendment of GASB Statement No. 67, No. 68, and No. 73, we have restated to show covered payroll based on pensionable earnings. 78 335 City of La Quinta, California Schedule of Changes in the Net OPEB Liability/(Asset) and Related Ratios Last 10 Years* 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Total OPEB Liability Service cost $ 90,827 $ 93,438 $ 85,174 $ 88,219 $ 87,732 $ 85,049 Interest 93,346 100,177 93,071 97,183 102,210 107,396 Differences between expected and actual experience - 71,533 - 103,495 (1,617) (623,785) Changes of assumptions (44,229) (14,219) 44,464 26,883 Benefit payments (91,822) (86,570) (98,584) (98,490) (89,947) (94,021) Net Change in Total OPEB Liability 92,351 134,349 65,442 234,871 98,378 (498,478) Total OPEB liability- beginning 1,288,598 1,380,949 1,515,298 1,580,740 1,815,611 1,913,989 TotalOPEBliability- ending $ 1,380,949 $ 1,515,298 $ 1,580,740 $ 1,815,611 $ 1,913,989 $ 1,415,511 Plan Fiduciary Net Position (FNP) Employer contributions $ $ 1,609,970 $ 98,584 $ 98,490 $ 89,947 $ 94,021 Net investment income (1,680) 106,805 88,052 336,983 (257,883) Benefit payments (86,570) (98,584) (98,490) (89,947) (94,021) Administrative expense (406) (327) (803) (624) (518) Net Change in Plan Fiduciary Net Position 1,521,314 106,478 87,249 336,359 (258,401) Plan Fiduciary Net Position- Beginning of Year - 1,521,314 1,627,792 1,715,041 2,051,400 Plan Fiduciary Net Position- End of Year $ $ 1,521,314 $ 1,627,792 $ 1,715,041 $ 2,051,400 $ 1,792,999 Net OPEB liability/(asset) - End of Year $ 1,380,949 $ (6,016) $ (47,052) $ 100,570 $ (137,411) $ (377,488) Fiduciary Net Position as a percentage of the Total OPEB Liability 0.0% 100.4% 103.0% 94.5% Covered -employee payroll 5,603,428 6,064,875 6,669,204 7,066,830 Net OPEB liability/(asset) as a percentage of covered -employee payroll 24.6% -0.1% -0.7% 1.4% Notes to Schedule: * Fiscal year 2018 was the first year of implementation, therefore only six years are shown. Changes in Assumptions The discount rate and long-term expected rate of return changed from 6.00 percent used for the June 30, 2019 measurement date to 5.50 percent used for the June 30, 2020 measurement date. The inflation assumption was changed from 2.50 percent used for the June 30, 2019 measurement date to 2.25 percent used for the June 30, 2020 measurement date. For the June 30, 2020 measurement date, healthcare trend rates were reset to reflect updated cost increase expectations. 107.2% 126.7% 6,238,425 6,223,072 -2.2% -6.1% 79 336 City of La Quinta, California Schedule of OPEB Contributions Last 10 Years* 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Actuarially determined contribution (ADC) $ 201,513 $ 88,280 $ 90,229 $ 86,939 $ 101,376 $ 78,734 Contributions in relation to the (ADC) 1,609,970 98,584 98,490 89,947 91,530 58,070 Contribution deficiency (excess) (1,408,457) (10,304) (8,261) (3,008) 9,846 20,664 Covered -employee payroll $ 6,064,875 $ 6,669,204 $ 7,066,830 $ 6,238,425 $ 6,223,072 $ 6,682,312 Contributions as a percentage of covered-emp 26.5% 1.5% 1.4% 1.4% 1.5% 0.9% Notes to Schedule Valuation date: Actuarially determined contribution rates are calculated as of June 30, one year prior to the end of the fiscal year in which contributions reported. Methods and assumptions used to determined contribution rates: Actuarial cost method Entry -Age Normal Cost Method Amortization method Level percent of payroll Amortization period 19 years Asset valuation method Market value Inflation 2.25% Healthcare Trend Rate 7% in the first year, trending down to 4% over 58 years. Investment rate of return 5.50% Retirement age 55 Mortality Derived using CalPERS Membership Data for all Funds Notes to Schedule: * Fiscal year 2018 was the first year of implementation, therefore only six years are shown. 80 337 City of La Quinta, California Note to Required Supplementary Information June 30, 2023 Note 1- Budget Procedures General Budget Policies The City adopts an annual budget prepared on the modified accrual basis of accounting for its governmental funds and on the accrual basis of accounting for its proprietary funds. The City manager or his designee is authorized to transfer budgeted amounts between the accounts of any department or funds that are approved by City Council. Prior year appropriations lapse unless they are approved for carryover into the following fiscal year. Expenditures may not legally exceed appropriations at the department level. The City did not adopt a budget for the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Special Revenue Fund. Budget Basis of Accounting Budget for governmental funds is adopted on a basis consistent with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). Expenditures in Excess of Appropriations The following funds had expenditures in excess of appropriations for the year ended June 30, 2023: Budget Actual Variance General Fund Debt Service $ - $ 10,764 $ (10,764) Housing Authority Capital Outlay - 201,409 (201,409) Library and Museum Transfers out - 122,382 (122,382) South Coast Air Quality Planning and Development 46,500 52,827 (6,327) AB 939 Planning and Development 150,000 180,543 (30,543) Housing Grants Planning and Development 90,000 97,052 (7,052) Law Enforcement Public Safety 17,000 29,366 (12,366) Transfer Out - 49,296 (49,296) Measure A Public Works - 33,703 (33,703) Library Development Debt Service 15,000 25,504 (10,504) 81 338 Supplementary Information June 30, 2023 City of La Quinta, California 339 This page intentionally left blank. 340 City of La Quinta, California Other Governmental Funds June 30, 2023 Special Revenue Funds Special revenue funds are used to account for specific revenues (other than expendable trusts and major capital projects) and the related expenditures that are legally required to be accounted for in a separate fund. The City of La Quinta has the following Special Revenue Funds: State Gas Tax Fund —To account for gasoline allocations made by the State of California. These revenues are restricted by the State to expenditures for street -related purposes only. Library and Museum Fund — To account for revenues from property tax increment dedicated library and museum services. Federal Assistance Fund — To account for revenues from the Community Development Block Grants received from the Federal Government and the expenditures of those resources. State Law Enforcement Services Account (SLESA) Fund —To account for state funded "Citizens for Public Safety" (COPS) program activities, as per Assembly Bill 3229, which supplements frontline police services such as anti - gang community crime prevention. Lighting and Landscaping Fund — To account for special assessments levied on real property and the expenditure thereof from City-wide lighting and landscape maintenance and improvements. Quimby Fund — To account for the accumulation of developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and improvements. Capital projects to be funded from this source will be budgeted and expended in a separate capital projects fund. La Quinta Public Safety Officer Fund — To account for contributions to be distributed to public safety officers disabled or killed in the line of duty. Art in Public Places — To account for development fees paid in lieu of acquisition and installation of approved artworks in a development with expenditures restricted to acquisition, installation, maintenance and repair of artworks at approved sites. South Coast Air Quality Fund — To account for contributions from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Use is limited to reduction and control of airborne pollutants. AB 939 Fund —To account for the State mandated program to reduce waste sent to the landfills through recycling efforts. Housing Grant Fund — To account for housing related grants as required by outside agencies for reporting purposes. Law Enforcement Fund — To account for law enforcement grants and restricted revenue for public safety. 82 341 City of La Quinta, California Other Governmental Funds June 30, 2023 Measure A Fund — In 1988, Riverside County voters approved a half cent sales tax, known as Measure A, to fund a variety of highway improvements, local street and road maintenance, commuter assistance and specialized highway transit projects. This fund is used to collect this tax and pursuant to the provision of Measure A, it is restricted for local street and road expenditures. Economic Development Fund —To account for the revenues and expenditures related to proceeds from sale of City owned land and future economic development. AB 1379 Fund — To account for the revenues and expenditures related to the annual business license accessibility fee to be used for expenses enhancing accessibility requirements. Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee Fund —To account for the revenues and expenditures related to Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee monies. Capital Project Funds Capital projects funds account for the financial resources to be used for the acquisition, construction or improvements of major capital facilities and infrastructure. Infrastructure Fund —To account for the accumulation of resources provided through developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City's infrastructure, prior to adoption of the new Developer Impact Fee Structure on August 16, 1999. This fund accounts for all developer resources received prior to this date, and is budgeted by the Council through adoption of the annual capital improvement program budget. Civic Center Fund —This fund accounts for the accumulation of resources provided through developer fees for the acquisition, construction, or improvement of the Civic Center. Maintenance Facilities DIF, Transportation Fund, Parks and Recreations Fund, Library Development Fund, Community Center Fund, Street Facility Fund, Park Facility Fund, Fire Facility Fund —To account for the accumulation of resources provided through developer fees for the acquisition, construction, or improvement of the City's infrastructure. The Developer Impact Fee was adopted by the City Council on August 16, 1999. Eight funds have been established to account for the specific impact areas of these fees, and are budgeted by the Council through adoption of the annual Capital Improvement Program budget. Debt Service Funds Debt Service Funds are used to account for the accumulation of resources for, and the payment of, governmental long-term debt principal and interest. La Quinta Financing Authority Fund — This fund is used to account for the debt service that will be used for the principal and interest payments of the Financing Authority's outstanding debt and any related reporting requirements. 83 342 City of La Quinta, California Combining Balance Sheet - Nonmajor Governmental Funds June 30, 2023 Special Revenue Funds State Library and Federal Lighting and Gas Tax Museum Assistance SLESA Landscaping Assets Pooled cash and investments $ 2,579,476 $ 10,296,846 $ 2,152 $ 482,257 $ 799,316 Receivables Accounts - - - - - Taxes 232,421 - - - 45,397 Accrued interest 2,285 9,121 2 427 708 Prepaid costs - 468 - - - Due from other governments - 1,376,888 180,349 - 11,448 Total assets $ 2,814,182 $ 11,683,323 $ 182,503 $ 482,684 $ 856,869 Liabilities and Fund Balances Liabilities Accounts payable $ 1,698 $ 131,262 $ $ 918 $ 287,970 Accrued liabilities 25,399 4,354 - 14,821 Due to other governments - - - Due to other funds - - - - Total liabilities 27,097 135,616 918 302,791 Deferred Inflow of Resources Unavailable revenues - - 180,349 - - Fund Balances Nonspendable Prepaid costs 468 - Restricted for Planning and development projects - - Public safety - - 481,766 Community services - 11,547,239 2,154 - - Public works 2,787,085 - - 554,078 Capital projects - - Unassigned - - - - - Total fund balances 2,787,085 11,547,707 2,154 481,766 554,078 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 2,814,182 $ 11,683,323 $ 182,503 $ 482,684 $ 856,869 84 343 City of La Quinta, California Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Governmental Funds June 30, 2023 Special Revenue Funds La Quinta Public Art in South Coast Quimby Safety Officer Public Places Air Quality AB 939 Assets Pooled cash and investments $ $ 53,093 $ 870,589 $ 84,772 $ 728,940 Receivables Accounts - - - - Taxes - - - - Accruedinterest 47 771 75 646 Prepaid costs - - - - Due from other governments - 12,627 3,826 Total assets $ $ 53,140 $ 871,360 $ 97,474 $ 733,412 Liabilities and Fund Balances Liabilities Accounts payable $ $ $ $ 11,254 $ 2,412 Accrued liabilities - - Due to other governments Due to other funds 735,460 - - Total liabilities 735,460 11,254 2,412 Deferred Inflow of Resources Unavailable revenues - - - Fund Balances Nonspendable Prepaid costs - - Restricted for Planning and development projects 86,220 731,000 Public safety 53,140 - - - Community services - 871,360 Public works - Capital projects Unassigned (735,460) - - - Total fund balances (735,460) 53,140 871,360 86,220 731,000 Total liabilities and fund balances $ $ 53,140 $ 871,360 $ 97,474 $ 733,412 85 344 Assets Pooled cash and investments Receivables Accounts Taxes Accrued interest Prepaid costs Due from other governments Total assets Liabilities and Fund Balances Liabilities Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Due to other governments Due to other funds Total liabilities Deferred Inflow of Resources Unavailable revenues Fund Balances Nonspendable Prepaid costs Restricted for Planning and development projects Public safety Community services Public works Capital projects Unassigned Total fund balances City of La Quinta, California Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Governmental Funds June 30, 2023 Special Revenue Funds Housing Law Economic Grant Enforcement Measure A Development AB 1379 $ $ 202,308 $ 3,753,241 $ 3,288,072 $ 86,425 - - 169,977 - - 357,529 - - 179 3,325 2,912 77 $ $ 202,487 $ 4,114,095 $ 3,460,961 $ 86,502 60,267 35,394 60,267 35,394 $ 7,510 $ 1,923 7,510 1,923 169,977 - 84,579 167,093 - - - - 3,283,474 4,114,095 - (60,267) - - - (60,267) 167,093 4,114,095 3,283,474 84,579 Total liabilities and fund balances $ $ 202,487 $ 4,114,095 $ 3,460,961 $ 86,502 86 345 City of La Quinta, California Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Governmental Funds June 30, 2023 Special Revenue Funds Capital Projects Funds Transportation Maintenance Uniform Facilities Mitigation Fee DIF Infrastructure Civic Center Transportation Assets Pooled cash and investments $ 349,818 $ 311,407 $ 19,225 $ 1,666,219 $ 5,513,259 Receivables Accounts - - - - - Taxes - - - - Accrued interest 276 17 1,475 4,883 Prepaid costs - - - - Due from other governments - - - - Total assets $ 349,818 $ 311,683 $ 19,242 $ 1,667,694 $ 5,518,142 Liabilities and Fund Balances Liabilities Accounts payable $ 343,221 $ - $ - $ - $ - Accrued liabilities - Due to other governments Due to other funds - Total liabilities 343,221 Deferred Inflow of Resources Unavailable revenues - Fund Balances Nonspendable Prepaid costs - - Restricted for Planning and development projects 6,597 311,683 Public safety - - Community services Public works - - - Capital projects 19,242 1,667,694 5,518,142 Unassigned - - - - Total fund balances 6,597 311,683 19,242 1,667,694 5,518,142 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 349,818 $ 311,683 $ 19,242 $ 1,667,694 $ 5,518,142 87 346 City of La Quinta, California Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Governmental Funds June 30, 2023 Capital Projects Funds Parks and Library Community Recreation Development Center Street Facility Park Facility Assets Pooled cash and investments $ 1,607,785 $ $ 979,452 $ 80,190 $ 7,552 Receivables Accounts - - - - Taxes - - - - Accruedinterest 1,424 868 71 7 Prepaid costs - - - - Due from other governments - - - Total assets $ 1,609,209 $ $ 980,320 $ 80,261 $ 7,559 Liabilities and Fund Balances Liabilities Accounts payable $ $ $ $ $ Accrued liabilities Due to other governments 1,118,627 Due to other funds - Total liabilities 1,118,627 Deferred Inflow of Resources Unavailable revenues - Fund Balances Nonspendable Prepaid costs Restricted for Planning and development projects Public safety Community services 7,559 Public works 80,261 - Capital projects 1,609,209 980,320 - Unassigned - (1,118,627) - - - Total fund balances 1,609,209 (1,118,627) 980,320 80,261 7,559 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 1,609,209 $ $ 980,320 $ 80,261 $ 7,559 88 347 City of La Quinta, California Combining Balance Sheet — Nonmajor Governmental Funds June 30, 2023 Capital Projects Debt Service Fund Fund Total Financing Governmental Fire Facility Authority Funds Assets Pooled cash and investments $ 575,798 $ $ 34,338,192 Receivables Accounts - 169,977 Taxes - 635,347 Accrued interest 510 30,106 Prepaid costs - 468 Due from other governments - 1,585,138 Total assets $ 576,308 $ $ 36,759,228 Liabilities and Fund Balances Liabilities Accounts payable $ - $ $ 788,168 Accrued liabilities 44,574 Due to other governments 1,118,627 Due to other funds 831,121 Total liabilities 2,782,490 Deferred Inflow of Resources Unavailable revenues 350,326 Fund Balances Nonspendable Prepaid costs 468 Restricted for Planning and development projects - 1,220,079 Public safety 576,308 1,278,307 Community services - 15,711,786 Public works 7,535,519 Capital projects 9,794,607 Unassigned - (1,914,354) Total fund balances 576,308 33,626,412 Total liabilities and fund balances $ 576,308 $ $ 36,759,228 89 348 City of La Quinta, California Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances — Nonmajor Governmental Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Revenues Taxes Assessments Intergovernmental Investment income Net decrease in fair value of investments Developer participation Miscellaneous Total revenues Expenditures Current General government Public safety Planning and development Community services Public works Capital outlay Debt service Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over(under)Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net Change in Fund Balances Fund Balances, Beginning of Year Fund Balances, End of Year Special Revenue Funds State Library and Federal Lighting and Gas Tax Museum Assistance SLESA Landscaping - - - - 981,315 1,809,499 3,531,533 181,574 165,271 - 48,630 212,997 37 9,398 13,718 (32,270) (83,053) (11) (4,748) (6,620) - 2,602 - - 23,499 1,825,859 3,664,079 181,600 169,921 1,011,912 65,558 - 1,966,150 - - 1,308,114 - 3,315 2,576,738 2,576,738 1,308,114 1,966,150 3,315 65,558 517,745 1,697,929 178,285 104,363 (1,564,826) 600,000 - - - 1,500,000 (248,723) (122,382) (178,259) - 351,277 (122,382) (178,259) - 1,500,000 869,022 1,575,547 26 104,363 (64,826) 1,918,063 9,972,160 2,128 377,403 618,904 $ 2,787,085 $ 11,547,707 $ 2,154 $ 481,766 $ 554,078 90 349 City of La Quinta, California Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Governmental Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Revenues Taxes Assessments Intergovernmental Investment income Net decrease in fair value of investments Developer participation Miscellaneous Total revenues Expenditures Current General government Public safety Planning and development Community services Public works Capital outlay Debt service Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over(under)Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net Change in Fund Balances Fund Balances, Beginning of Year Fund Balances, End of Year Revenue Funds La Quinta Public Art in South Coast Quimby Safety Officer Public Places Air Quality AB 939 $ $ $ $ $ 84,847 101,757 - 1,087 17,868 1,635 15,170 (330) (5,242) (1,329) (1,050) - 83,086 757 95,712 102,063 98,967 - 52,827 180,543 59,627 - - 48,347 - 107,974 52,827 180,543 757 (12,262) 49,236 (81,576) 2,000 50,000 - (21,791) - (75) (21,791) 2,000 49,925 - (21,791) 2,757 37,663 49,236 (81,576) (713,669) 50,383 833,697 36,984 812,576 $ (735,460) $ 53,140 $ 871,360 $ 86,220 $ 731,000 91 350 City of La Quinta, California Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Governmental Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Special Revenue Funds Housing Law Economic Grant Enforcement Measure A Development AB 1379 Revenues Taxes $ $ $ 2,036,268 $ $ Assessments - - Intergovernmental 160,000 4,896 - 19,231 Investment income - 4,565 74,637 149,413 1,688 Net decrease in fair value of investments (35) (8,641) (19,798) (861) Developer participation - - Miscellaneous - - - - Total revenues 160,000 9,426 2,102,264 129,615 20,058 Expenditures Current General government - - - - - Public safety - 29,366 - - Planning and development 97,052 - 3,000 1,923 Community services - - - - Public works 33,703 Capital outlay - Debt service Interest and fiscal charges - - - - - Total expenditures 97,052 29,366 33,703 3,000 1,923 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures 62,948 (19,940) 2,068,561 126,615 18,135 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - Transfers out (49,296) (2,694,735) Total other financing sources (uses) - (49,296) (2,694,735) - - Net Change in Fund Balances 62,948 (69,236) (626,174) 126,615 18,135 Fund Balances, Beginning of Year (123,215) 236,329 4,740,269 3,156,859 66,444 Fund Balances, End of Year $ (60,267) $ 167,093 $ 4,114,095 $ 3,283,474 $ 84,579 92 351 City of La Quinta, California Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances — Nonmajor Governmental Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Revenues Taxes Assessments Intergovernmental Investment income Net decrease in fair value of investments Developer participation Miscellaneous Total revenues Expenditures Current General government Public safety Planning and development Community services Public works Capital outlay Debt service Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net Change in Fund Balances Fund Balances, Beginning of Year Fund Balances, End of Year Special Revenue Capital Proiects Funds Transportation Maintenance Uniform Facilities Mitigation Fee DIF Infrastructure Civic Center Transportation 5,489 398 30,521 103,344 (4,212) (105) (19,897) (48,299) 130,312 - 530,615 1,755,485 131,589 293 541,239 1,810,530 400,000 - - 400,000 131,589 293 541,239 1,410,530 (75) (395,857) - (75) (395,857) - 131,S89 293 541,164 1,014,673 6,597 180,094 18,949 1,126,530 4,503,469 $ 6,597 $ 311,683 $ 19,242 $ 1,667,694 $ 5,518,142 93 352 City of La Quinta, California Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances - Nonmajor Governmental Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Capital Projects Funds Parks and Library Community Recreation Development Center Street Facility Park Facility Revenues Taxes $ $ $ $ $ Assessments Intergovernmental - Investment income 25,884 17,248 1,621 136 Net decrease in fair value of investments (28,661) (12,503) (505) (75) Developer participation 966,433 180,153 401,734 3,360 1,600 Miscellaneous - - - - Total revenues 963,656 180,153 406,479 4,476 1,661 Expenditures Current General government - - - - - Public safety Planning and development Community services Public works Capital outlay - Debt service Interest and fiscal charges 25,504 Total expenditures - 25,504 - - - Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures 963,656 154,649 406,479 4,476 1,661 Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfers in - - - - - Transfers out (28,715) Total other financing sources (uses) (28,715) - - - - Net Change in Fund Balances 934,941 154,649 406,479 4,476 1,661 Fund Balances, Beginning of Year 674,268 (1,273,276) 573,841 75,785 5,898 Fund Balances, End of Year $ 1,609,209 $ (1,118,627) $ 980,320 $ 80,261 $ 7,SS9 94 353 City of La Quinta, California Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenditures and Changes in Fund Balances — Nonmajor Governmental Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Revenues Taxes Assessments Intergovernmental Investment income Net decrease in fair value of investments Developer participation Miscellaneous Total revenues Expenditures Current General government Public safety Planning and development Community services Public works Capital outlay Debt service Interest and fiscal charges Total expenditures Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues over (under) Expenditures Other Financing Sources (Uses) Transfersin Transfers out Total other financing sources (uses) Net Change in Fund Balances Fund Balances, Beginning of Year Fund Balances, End of Year Debt Service Total Financing Governmental Fire Facility Authority Funds $ $ $ 2,121,115 981,315 5,973,761 10,689 907 747,080 (6,608) - (284,853) 162,923 4,215,701 - - 26,101 167,004 907 13,780,220 - 907 907 - 94,924 335,345 2,025,777 4,321,870 48,347 - 25,504 - 907 6,852,674 167,004 - 6,927,546 2,152,000 (3,739,908) - (1,587,908) 167,004 5,339,638 409,304 28,286,774 $ 576,308 $ $ 33,626,412 95 354 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Intergovernmental Use of money and property Transfers in Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund State Gas Tax Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 1,918,063 $ 1,918,063 2,083,011 8,000 600,000 4,609,074 2,091,011 8,000 600,000 4,617,074 Actual Amounts $ 1,918,063 1,809,499 16,360 600,000 4,343,922 Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) (281,512) 8,360 (273,152) Public works 1,747,140 1,758,759 1,308,114 450,645 Transfers out 940,211 1,956,659 248,723 1,707,936 Total charges to appropriations 2,687,351 3,715,418 1,556,837 2,158,581 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 1,921,723 $ 901,656 $ 2,787,085 $ 1,885,429 96 355 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Intergovernmental Use of money and property Miscellaneous revenue Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Community services Capital outlay Transfers out Total charges to appropriations Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund Library and Museum Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 9,972,160 $ 9,972,160 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) $ 9,972,160 $ - 2,800,000 2,800,000 3,531,533 731,533 60,000 60,000 129,944 69,944 7,000 7,000 2,602 (4,398) 12,839,160 12,839,160 13,636,239 797,079 1,904,146 5,000 4,761,601 5,000 1,966,150 2,795,451 - 5,000 122,382 (122,382) 1,909,146 4,766,601 2,088,532 2,678,069 $ 10,930,014 $ 8,072,559 $ 11,547,707 $ 3,475,148 97 356 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Intergovernmental Use of money and property Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Public works Transfers out Total charges to appropriations Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund Federal Assistance Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 2,128 $ 2,128 156,000 391,126 158,128 393,254 20,000 20,000 132,600 367,726 Actual Amounts $ 2,128 181,574 26 Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) C� (209,552) 26 183,728 (209,526) 3,315 16,685 178,259 189,467 152,600 387,726 181,574 206,152 $ 5,528 $ 5,528 $ 2,154 $ (3,374) 98 357 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Intergovernmental Use of money and property Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Public safety Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund SLESA Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Actual Original Final Amounts $ 377,403 $ 377,403 $ 377,403 100,000 100,000 165,271 1,000 1,000 4,650 478,403 478,403 547,324 100,000 100,000 65,558 Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) C� W 65,271 3,650 68,921 34,442 $ 378,403 $ 378,403 $ 481,766 $ 103,363 99 358 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Assessments Use of money and property Miscellaneous Transfers in City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund Lighting and Landscaping Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 618,904 $ 618,904 Actual Amounts $ 618,904 982,300 982,300 981,315 1,000 1,000 7,098 - - 23,499 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) C, W (985) 6,098 23,499 Amounts available for appropriations 3,102,204 3,102,204 3,130,816 28,612 Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Public works 2,465,376 2,710,631 2,576,738 133,893 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 636,828 $ 391,573 $ 554,078 $ 162,505 100 359 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Developer participation Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Transfers out City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund Quimby Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ (713,669) $ (713,669) 25,000 25,000 466,967 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) $ (713,669) $ - - (25,000) (713,669) (25,000) 21,791 445,176 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ (688,669) $ (1,155,636) $ (735,460) $ 420,176 101 360 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property Transfers in Amounts available for appropriations Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund La Quinta Public Safety Officer Year Ended June 30, 2023 Variance with Final Budget Budget Amounts Actual Positive Original Final Amounts (Negative) $ 50,383 $ 50,383 $ 50,383 $ - 200 200 757 557 2,000 2,000 2,000 - 52,583 52,583 53,140 557 $ 52,583 $ 52,583 $ 53,140 $ 557 102 361 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property Developer participation Transfer In Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Community services Capital outlay Transfers out Total charges to appropriations Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule - Special Revenue Fund Art in Public Places Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 833,697 $ 833,697 Actual Amounts $ 833,697 Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) C� W 3,000 3,000 12,626 9,626 100,000 100,000 83,086 (16,914) 50,000 50,000 50,000 - 986,697 986,697 979,409 (7,288) 77,000 77,000 100,000 136,700 - 212,465 177,000 426,165 $ 809,697 $ 560,532 59,627 48,347 75 108,049 $ 871,360 17,373 88,353 212,390 318,116 $ 310,828 103 362 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund South Coast Air Quality Year Ended June 30, 2023 Variance with Final Budget Budget Amounts Actual Positive Original Final Amounts (Negative) Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 $ 36,984 $ 36,984 $ 36,984 $ - Resources (Inflows) Intergovernmental 54,000 54,000 101,757 47,757 Use of money and property 400 400 306 (94) Amounts available for appropriations 91,384 91,384 139,047 47,663 Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Planning and development 46,500 46,500 52,827 (6,327) Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 44,884 $ 44,884 $ 86,220 $ 41,336 104 363 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (InFlows) Taxes Use of money and property Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Planning and development City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund AB 939 Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 812,576 $ 812,576 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) $ 812,576 $ - 60,000 60,000 84,847 24,847 4,000 4,000 14,120 10,120 876,576 876,576 911,543 34,967 150,000 150,000 180,543 (30,543) Total charges to appropriations 150,000 150,000 180,543 (30,543) Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 726,576 $ 726,576 $ 731,000 $ 4,424 105 364 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Intergovernmental Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Planning and development Total charges to appropriations Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund Housing Grants Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ (123,215) $ (123,215) $ Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) (123,215) $ - - 160,000 160,000 (123,215) (123,215) 36,785 160,000 - 90,000 90,000 $ (123,215) $ (213,215) $ 97,052 (7,052) 97,052 (7,052) (60,267) $ 152,948 106 365 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Intergovernmental Use of money and property Miscellaneous revenue Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Public safety Transfers out Total charges to appropriations Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund Law Enforcement Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original $ 236,329 $ Final Actual Amounts 236,329 $ 236,329 2,100 2,100 17,000 17,000 Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) 4,896 4,896 4,530 2,430 - (17,000) 255,429 255,429 245,755 (9,674) 17,000 17,000 29,366 (12,366) - - 49,296 (49,296) 17,000 17,000 78,662 (61,662) $ 238,429 $ 238,429 $ 167,093 $ (71,336) 107 366 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Taxes Use of money and property Miscellaneous revenue Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (OutFlows) City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund Measure A Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 4,740,269 $ 4,740,269 Actual Amounts $ 4,740,269 1,865,000 1,865,000 2,036,268 10,000 10,000 65,996 6,615,269 6,615,269 6,842,533 Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) C� 171,268 55,996 227,264 Public works - - 33,703 (33,703) Transfers out 3,882,000 5,843,145 2,694,735 3,148,410 Total charges to appropriations 3,882,000 5,843,145 2,728,438 3,114,707 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 2,733,269 $ 772,124 $ 4,114,095 $ 3,341,971 108 367 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund Economic Development Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 3,156,859 $ 3,156,859 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) $ 3,156,859 $ - 15,000 15,000 12 9, 615 114,615 3,171,859 3,171,859 3,286,474 114,615 Planning and development 21,500 21,500 3,000 18,500 Total charges to appropriations 21,500 21,500 3,000 18,500 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 3,150,359 $ 3,150,359 $ 3,283,474 $ 133,115 109 368 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Intergovernmental Use of money and property Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Planning and development Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Special Revenue Fund AB 1379 Year Ended June 30, 2023 Variance with Final Budget Budget Amounts Actual Positive Original Final Amounts (Negative) $ 66,444 $ 66,444 $ 66,444 $ - 20,000 20,000 19,231 (769) 200 200 827 627 86,644 86,644 86,502 (142) 5,500 5,500 1,923 3,577 $ 81,144 $ 81,144 $ 84,579 $ 3,435 110 369 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Intergovernmental Developer participation Transfers in Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Capital Projects Fund Capital Improvement Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ (990,472) $ (990,472) 13,136,811 12,146,339 22,057,829 921,527 56,493,897 78,482,781 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) $ (990,472) $ - 391,120 (21,666,709) 420 (921,107) 7,927,550 (48,566,347) 7,328,618 (71,154,163) Planning and development - 2,591,436 33,757 2,557,679 Capital outlay 13,136,811 75,821,693 13,394,469 62,427,224 Total charges to appropriations 13,136,811 78,413,129 13,428,226 64,984,903 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ (990,472) $ 69,652 $ (6,099,608) $ (6,169,260) 111 370 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Capital Projects Fund Maintenance Facilities DIF Fund Year Ended June 30, 2023 Variance with Final Budget Budget Amounts Actual Positive Original Final Amounts (Negative) Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 $ 180,094 $ 180,094 $ 180,094 $ - Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property 500 500 1,277 777 Developer participation 75,000 75,000 130,312 55,312 Amounts available for appropriations 255,594 255,594 311,683 56,089 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 255,594 $ 255,594 $ 311,683 $ 56,089 112 371 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property Amounts available for City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Capital Projects Fund Infrastructure Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 18,949 $ 18,949 100 100 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) $ 18,949 $ - 293 193 appropriations 19,049 19,049 19,242 193 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 19,049 $ 19,049 $ 19,242 $ 193 113 372 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Capital Projects Fund Civic Center Year Ended June 30, 2023 Variance with Final Budget Budget Amounts Actual Positive Original Final Amounts (Negative) Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 $ 1,126,530 $ 1,126,530 $ 1,126,530 $ - Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property 1,000 1,000 10,624 9,624 Developer participation 300,000 300,000 530,615 230,615 Amounts available for appropriations 1,427,530 1,427,530 1,667,769 240,239 Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Transfers Out 250,000 250,000 75 249,925 Total charges to appropriations 250,000 250,000 75 249,925 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 1,177,530 $ 1,177,530 $ 1,667,694 $ 490,164 114 373 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property Developer participation Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Public works Transfers out City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Capital Projects Fund Transportation Year Ended June 30, 2023 Variance with Final Budget Budget Amounts Actual Positive Original Final Amounts (Negative) $ 4,503,469 $ 4,503,469 $ 4,503,469 $ - 20,000 20,000 55,045 35,045 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,755,485 755,485 5,523,469 400,000 100,000 5,523,469 400,000 1,516,757 6,313,999 400,000 395,857 790,530 1,120,900 Total charges to appropriations 500,000 1,916,757 795,857 1,120,900 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 5,023,469 $ 3,606,712 $ 5,518,142 $ 1,911,430 115 374 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property Developer participation City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Capital Projects Fund Parks and Recreation Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 674,268 $ 674,268 1,000 1,000 500,000 500,000 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) $ 674,268 $ - (2,777) (3,777) 966,433 466,433 Amounts available for appropriations 1,175,268 1,175,268 1,637,924 462,656 Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Transfers out 500,000 500,000 28,715 471,285 Total charges to appropriations 500,000 500,000 28,715 471,285 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 675,268 $ 675,268 $ 1,609,209 $ 933,941 116 375 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Developer participation Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Debt service Interest and fiscal charges City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Capital Projects Fund Library Development Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ (1,273,276) $ (1,273,276) Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) $ (1,273,276) $ - 75,000 75,000 180,153 105,153 (1,198,276) (1,198,276) (1,093,123) 105,153 15,000 15,000 25,504 (10,504) Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ (1,213,276) $ (1,213,276) $ (1,118,627) $ 94,649 117 376 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property Developer participation Amounts available for appropriations Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) Transfers out Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Capital Projects Fund Community Center Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Actual Original Final Amounts $ 573,841 $ 573,841 $ 573,841 2,000 2,000 4,745 150,000 150,000 401,734 725,841 725,841 980,320 - 125,000 - Variance with Final Budget Positive (Negative) C� W 2,745 251,734 254,479 125,000 $ 725,841 $ 600,841 $ 980,320 $ 379,479 118 377 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Capital Projects Fund Street Facility Year Ended June 30, 2023 Variance with Final Budget Budget Amounts Actual Positive Original Final Amounts (Negative) Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 $ 75,785 $ 75,785 $ 75,785 $ - Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property - - 1,116 1,116 Developer participation 10,000 10,000 3,360 (6,640) Amounts available for appropriations 85,785 85,785 80,261 (5,524) Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 85,785 $ 85,785 $ 80,261 $ (5,524) 119 378 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property Developer participation City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Capital Projects Fund Park Facility Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 5,898 $ 5,898 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) $ 5,898 $ - 61 61 1,600 1,600 Amounts available for appropriations 5,898 5,898 7,559 1,661 Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 5,898 $ 5,898 $ 7,559 $ 1,661 120 379 Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property Developer participation Amounts available for appropriations Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Capital Projects Fund Fire Facility Year Ended June 30, 2023 Budget Amounts Original Final $ 409,304 $ 409,304 Variance with Final Budget Actual Positive Amounts (Negative) $ 409,304 $ - 1,000 1,000 4,081 3,081 100,000 100,000 162,923 62,923 510,304 510,304 576,308 66,004 $ 510,304 $ 510,304 $ 576,308 $ 66,004 121 380 City of La Quinta, California Budgetary Comparison Schedule — Debt Service Fund Financing Authority Year Ended June 30, 2023 Variance with Final Budget Budget Amounts Actual Positive Original Final Amounts (Negative) Budgetary Fund Balance, July 1 $ - $ - $ - $ - Resources (Inflows) Use of money and property 1,100 Amounts available for appropriations 1,100 Charges to Appropriation (Outflows) General government Budgetary Fund Balance, June 30 $ 1,100 1,100 907 (193) 1,100 907 (193) 1,100 907 193 122 381 City of La Quinta, California Internal Service Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Internal service funds are used to account for activities involved in rendering services to departments within the City. Costs of materials and services used are accumulated in this fund and charged to the user departments as such goods are delivered or services rendered. The City of La Quinta has the following Internal Service Funds: Equipment Replacement Fund —To account for the operational maintenance and ultimate replacement of City owned and operated vehicles and equipment. Information Technology Fund — To account for the purchase and replacement of information systems. Park Equipment and Facilities Fund —To account for the purchase and replacement of City owned and operated park equipment and facilities. Insurance Fund — To account for the City's insurance coverage. 123 382 Assets Current Pooled cash and investments Receivables Accrued interest Prepaid costs Total current assets Noncurrent Capital assets - net Right to use leased assets, net of accumulated amortization Right to use subscription IT assets, net of accumulated amortization Total noncurrent assets Totalassets Liabilities Current Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Accrued interest Current portion of leases Current portion of subscription IT arrangement Total current liabilities Noncurrent Long-term portion of leases Long-term portion of subscription IT arrangement Total noncurrent liabilities Total liabilities Net Position Net investment in capital assets Unrestricted Total net position Total liabilities and net position City of La Quinta, California Combining Statement of Net Position Internal Service Funds June 30, 2023 Governmental Activities - Internal Service Funds Par Equipment Information Equipment Replacement Technology and Facilities Insurance Totals $ 4,206,434 $ 2,997,084 $ 3,770,268 $ 611,912 $ 11,585,698 3,726 2,655 3,340 542 10,263 - 252,053 - 1,002 253,055 4,210,160 3,251,792 3,773,608 613,456 11,849,016 1,896,836 160,972 11,340,555 13,398,363 33,108 - - 33,108 - 592,321 - 592,321 1,929,944 753,293 11,340,555 14,023,792 6,140,104 4,005,085 15,114,163 613,456 25,872,808 13,146 221,464 393,768 865 629,243 - 12,281 - - 12,281 51 - 51 31,159 - 31,159 - 352,117 - - 352,117 44,356 585,862 393,768 865 1,024,851 5,303 - 5,303 - 143,557 143,557 5,303 143,557 - - 148,860 49,659 729,419 393,768 865 1,173,711 1,893,482 257,619 11,340,555 - 13,491,656 4,196,963 3,018,047 3,379,840 612,591 11,207,441 6,090,445 3,275,666 14,720,395 612,591 24,699,097 $ 6,140,104 $ 4,005,085 $ 15,114,163 $ 613,456 $ 25,872,808 124 383 City of La Quinta, California Combining Statement of Revenues, Expenses and Changes in Fund Net Position Internal Service Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Governmental Activities - Internal Service Funds Par Equipment Information Equipment and Replacement Technology Facilities Insurance Totals Operating Revenues Sales and service charges $ 1,664,000 $ 2,263,132 $ 450,000 $ 1,020,000 $ 5,397,132 Total operating revenues 1,664,000 2,263,132 450,000 1,020,000 5,397,132 Operating Expenses Administration and general (3,410) 43,788 - 191,839 232,217 Fuel and oil 138,412 - - - 138,412 Maintenance and parts 392,721 - - - 392,721 Contract services - 569,598 749,485 - 1,319,083 Software and supplies - 441,845 - 770,046 1,211,891 Depreciation and amortization expense 532,821 498,796 526,934 - 1,558,551 Total operating expenses 1,060,544 1,554,027 1,276,419 961,885 4,852,875 Operating Income (Loss) 603,456 709,105 (826,419) 58,115 544,257 Nonoperating Revenue (Expenses) Investment income 82,866 57,513 80,886 7,922 229,187 Net decrease in fair value of investments (33,905) (30,592) (19,260) (7,114) (90,871) Miscellaneous revenue 208,148 - - - 208,148 Gain on disposal of capital assets 189,571 44,601 - - 234,172 Interest expense (1,253) (20,490) - - (21,743) Total nonoperating revenues 445,427 51,032 61,626 808 558,893 Changes in Net Position 1,048,883 760,137 (764,793) 58,923 1,103,150 Net Position Beginning of Year, as restated 5,041,562 2,515,529 15,485,188 553,668 23,595,947 End of Year $ 6,090,445 $ 3,275,666 $ 14,720,395 $ 612,591 $ 24,699,097 125 384 Operating Activities Cash received from interfund services provided Cash paid to suppliers for goods and services Net Cash from Operating Activities Capital and Related Financing Activities Cash paid for lease liability- principal portion Cash paid for lease liability- interest portion Capital contributions Acquisition and construction of capital assets Proceeds from sales of capital assets Cash paid for subscription liability- principal portion Cash paid for subscription liability- interest portion Net Cash used for Capital and Related Financing Activities Investing Activities Investment Income Net Cash from Investing Activities Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Year Reconciliation of operating income to net cash from (used for) operating activities Operating income (loss) Adjustments to reconcile operating income (loss) to net cash from (used for) operating activities Depreciation/amortization Changesin Prepaid costs Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Total adjustments Net Cash from Operating Activities Non -Cash Transactions Capital assets acquired by lease City of La Quinta, California Combining Statement of Cash Flows Internal Service Funds Year Ended June 30, 2023 Governmental Activities - Internal Service Funds Park Equipment Information Equipment Replacement Technology and Facilities Insurance Totals $ 1,664,000 $ 2,263,132 $ 450,000 $ 1,020,000 $ 5,397,132 (578,215) (1,067,760) (357,759) (839,170) (2,842,904) 1,085,785 1,195,372 92,241 180,830 2,554,228 (98,772) (98,772) (1,372) (1,372) 208,148 208,148 (862,176) (117,894) (146,433) (1,126,503) 189,571 44,601 234,172 - (431,239) (431,239) (9,848) (9,848) (564,601) (514,380) (146,433) (1,225,414) 47,459 15,082 60,671 539 123,751 47,459 15,082 60,671 539 123,751 568,643 696,074 6,479 181,369 1,452,565 3,637,791 2,301,010 3,763,789 430,543 10,133,133 $ 4,206,434 $ 2,997,084 $ 3,770,268 $ 611,912 $ 11,585,698 $ 603,456 $ 709,105 $ (826,419) $ 58,115 $ 544,257 532,821 498,796 526,934 - 1,558,551 - (147,119) - 123,586 (23,533) (50,492) 123,725 391,726 (871) 464,088 - 10,865 - - 10,865 482,329 486,267 918,660 122,715 2,009,971 $ 1,085,785 $ 1,195,372 $ 92,241 $ 180,830 $ 2,554,228 $ $ 116,966 $ $ $ 116,966 126 385 This page intentionally left blank. 386 Statistical Section June 30, 2023 City of La Quinta, California 387 This page intentionally left blank. 388 City of La Quinta, California Statistical Section Year Ended June 30, 2023 This part of the City of La Quinta's annual comprehensive annual financial report presents detailed information as a context for understanding what the information in the financial statements, note disclosures, and required supplementary information says about the City's overall financial health. Contents Page Financial Trends These schedules contain trend information to help the reader understand how the City's financial performance and well-being have changed over time. 128 Revenue Capacity These schedules contain information to help the reader assess the factors affecting the City's ability to generate its property taxes. 140 Debt Capacity These schedules present information to help the reader assess the affordability of the City's current levels of understanding debt and the City's ability to use additional debt in the future. 149 Demographic and Economic Information These schedules offer demographic and economic indicators to help the reader understand the environment within which the City's financial activities take place and to help make comparisons over time and with other governments. 156 Operating Information These schedules contain information about the City's operations and resources to help the reader understand how the City's financial information relates to the services the City provides and the activities it performs. 159 Sources: Unless otherwise noted, the information in these schedules are derived from the annual comprehensive financial reports for the relevant year. 127 389 City of La Quinta, California Net Position by Component (Table 1) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Governmental Activities Net investment in capital assets $ 527,614,666 $ 523,495,389 $ 516,499,682 $ 517,039,487 $ 510,913,594 Restricted 53,669,248 62,472,221 61,148,731 38,824,860 39,204,789 Unrestricted 83,907,046 74,362,189 84,439,071 118,125,125 130,950,644 Total Governmental Activities Net Positior 665,190,960 660,329,799 662,087,484 6735989,472 6819069,027 Business -Type Activities Net investment in capital assets 41,354,565 44,118,111 43,898,784 43,836,868 43,585,880 Unrestricted (4,674,666) (4,892,647) (5,086,906) (5,140,966) (5,203,212) Total Business -Type Activities Net Positic 36,679,899 39,225,464 38,811,878 38,695,902 38,382,668 Primary Government Net investment in capital assets 568,969,231 567,613,500 560,398,466 560,876,355 554,499,474 Restricted 53,669,248 62,472,221 61,148,731 38,824,860 39,204,789 Unrestricted 79,232,380 69,469,542 79,352,165 112,984,159 125,747,432 Total Primary Government Net Position 701,870,859 699,555,263 700,899,362 712,685,374 719,451,695 Source: City of La Quinta 128 390 City of La Quinta, California Net Position by Component (Table 1) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Governmental Activities: $ 519,221,969 $ 509,777,422 $ 519,203,177 $ 517,697,036 $ 532,627,757 Net investment in capital assets 44,815,499 46,001,248 46,711,801 54,412,355 62,283,620 Restricted 138,584,041 142,418,499 162,887,430 190,618,323 220,277,110 Unrestricted 702,621,509 698,197,169 728,802,408 762,727,717 815,188,487 Total Governmental Activities Net Position Business -Type Activities: 43,375,536 39,712,955 42,717,914 42,491,762 42,242,526 Net investment in capital assets 240,125 3,145,820 368,750 1,036,834 1,166,307 Unrestricted 43,615,661 42,858,775 43,086,664 43,528,596 43,408,833 Total Business -Type Activities Net Position Primary Government: 562,597,505 549,490,377 561,921,091 560,188,798 574,870,283 Net investment in capital assets 44,815,499 46,001,248 46,711,801 53,601,581 62,283,620 Restricted 138,824,166 145,564,319 163,256,180 192,465,934 221,443,417 Unrestricted 746,237,170 741,055,944 771,889,072 806,256,313 858,597,320 Total Primary Government Net Position 129 391 City of La Quinta Changes in Net Position (Table 2) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Expenses Governmental activities: General government $ 4,830,239 $ 5,166,732 $ 5,645,004 $ 5,565,727 $ 8,869,174 Public safety 21,169,423 21,636,149 22,067,603 23,378,824 22,508,088 Planning and development 3,098,015 2,212,013 3,359,732 2,882,321 4,352,134 Community services 4,130,085 5,992,362 6,214,098 6,584,268 9,231,268 Public works 12,610,994 18,116,732 12,157,245 10,927,160 15,580,975 Interest on long-term debt 405,977 340,716 343,129 309,463 1,468,971 Total governmental activities expenditures 46,244,733 53,464,704 49,786,811 49,647,763 62,010,610 Business -type activities: Golf course 4,971,977 5,053,360 4,373,586 3,965,644 4,318,463 Total business -type activities expenditures 4,971,977 5,053,360 4,373,586 3,965,644 4,318,463 Total Primary Government Expenditures 51,216,710 58,518,064 54,160,397 53,613,407 66,329,073 Program Revenues Governmental activities: Charges for services: General government 71,042 121,140 192,538 504,127 883,153 Public safety 1,412,819 1,655,421 1,378,704 341,368 367,848 Planning and development 595,980 489,589 467,053 564,327 724,499 Community services 1,224,719 307,869 386,824 453,098 442,656 Public works 1,195,703 1,197,069 1,134,630 741,703 1,054,902 Operating grants and contributions 14,587,153 16,829,107 12,213,338 6,187,803 4,259,916 Capital grants and contributions 3,981,286 3,536,444 1,076,145 3,316,153 4,455,060 Total governmental activities program revenues 23,068,702 24,136,639 16,849,232 12,108,579 12,188,034 Business -type activities: Charges for services: Golf course 3,481,424 3,561,857 3,621,495 3,446,340 3,567,718 Capital grants and contributions - 2,872,122 - - - Total business -type activities program revenues 3,481,424 6,433,979 3,621,495 3,446,340 3,567,718 Total Primary Government Program Revenues 26,550,126 30,570,618 20,470,727 15,554,919 15,755,752 Net Revenues (Expenditures): Governmental activities (23,176,031) (29,328,065) (32,937,579) (37,539,184) (49,822,576) Business -type activities (1,490,553) 1,380,619 (752,091) (519,304) (750,745) Total Net Revenues (Expenditures) (24,666,584) (27,947,446) (33,689,670) (38,058,488) (50,573,321) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position: Governmental activities: Taxes: Property taxes 9,193,753 8,776,491 8,798,296 15,521,335 15,887,015 Transient occupancy taxes 6,307,737 6,637,183 7,835,745 9,433,970 10,752,788 Sales tax 8,786,819 8,873,008 9,107,046 10,060,305 18,956,985 Franchise taxes 1,688,263 1,861,453 1,799,938 1,815,491 1,977,179 Business license taxes 307,654 306,087 334,465 365,451 345,187 Othertaxes 580,834 530,336 516,964 585,333 718,472 Motor vehicle in lieu, unrestricted 3,291,042 3,486,367 3,651,549 3,813,213 3,941,348 Investment income 2,190,357 1,981,343 2,390,468 442,710 803,654 Net Increase (Decrease) of Investment Fair Value Miscellaneous 243,498 296,346 376,193 460,614 649,566 Special Item (interrund loan payoff) - - - - - Extraordinary gain/loss on dissolution of RDA (6,402,450) - - 7,344,050 3,624,121 Transfers (500,000) (247,739) (115,400) (401,300) (434,000) Total governmental activities 25,687,507 32,500,875 34,695,264 49,441,172 57,222,315 Business -type activities: Investment income 1,567 2,043 4,282 2,028 3,511 Net Increase (Decrease) of Investment Fair Value Miscellaneous 678,046 915,164 218,823 - - Transfers 500,000 247,739 115,400 401,300 434,000 Total business -type activities 1,179,613 1,164,946 338,505 403,328 437,511 Total Primary Government 35,033,759 49,844,500 57,659,826 Changes in Net Position Governmental activities 2,511,476 3,172,810 1,757,685 11,901,988 7,399,739 Business -type activities (310,940) 2,545,565 (413,586) (115,976) (313,234) Total Primary Government 2,200,536 5,718,375 1,344,099 11,786,012 7,086,505 Source r City of La Quinta For fiscal 2018/19, there is a one-time entry for an intedund loan noted as a'special item' under governmental activites and 'miscellaneous' under business type activities. This is also d!cussed in the Notes to Basic Financial Statements section of the 2018/19 CAFR, Note 19: Special Item. 130 392 City of La Quinta Changes in Net Position (Table 2) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Expenditures: Governmental activities: $ 9,085,863 $ 9,877,251 $ 8,106,209 $ 9,733,224 $ 17,213,248 General government 23,164,976 24,009,725 24,429,310 25,741,782 25,457,350 Public safety 5,913,321 5,845,836 6,508,522 4,716,745 3,146,264 Planning and development 6,202,084 11,362,950 6,958,234 8,439,863 9,550,001 Community services 4,430,519 32,248,031 11,438,197 14,985,480 14,043,797 Public works 210,941 98,049 42,081 11,914 25,504 Interest on long-term debt 49,007,703 83,441,842 57,482,553 63,629,008 69,436,164 Total governmental activities expenditures Business -type activities: 4,558,922 4,148,190 4,169,286 4,746,281 5,520,342 Golf course 4,558,922 4,148,190 4,169,286 4,746,281 5,520,342 Total business -type activities expenditures 53,566,625 87,590,032 61,651,839 68,375,289 74,956,506 Total Primary Government Expenditures Program Revenues: Governmental activities: Charges for services: 516,115 615,348 1,541,535 1,402,810 1,716,965 General government 376,249 367,277 770,760 648,914 555,423 Public safety 636,683 799,040 710,529 1,315,760 1,356,426 Planning and development 479,542 366,896 178,554 137,769 185,979 Community services 1,119,816 1,436,362 1,503,633 3,378,132 2,736,907 Public works 5,623,509 7,817,482 4,413,523 5,786,773 7,136,358 Operating grants and contributions 5,462,395 9,613,752 15,770,048 11,952,031 8,760,788 Capital grants and contributions 14,214,310 21,016,157 24,888,582 24,622,189 22,448,846 Total governmental activities program revenues Business -type activities: Charges for services: 3,773,396 2,746,748 3,509,096 4,679,163 4,767,458 Golf course - - - - - Capital grants and contributions 3,773,396 2,746,748 3,509,096 4,679,163 4,767,458 Total business -type activities program revenues 17,987,706 23,762,905 28,397,678 29,301,352 27,216,304 Total Primary Government Program Revenues Net Revenues (Expenditures): (34,793,394) (62,425,685) (32,593,971) (39,006,040) (46,987,318) Governmental activities (785,526) (1,401,442) (660,190) (67,118) (752,884) Business -type activities (35,578,920) (63,827,127) (33,254,161) (39,073,158) (47,740,202) Total Net Revenues (Expenditures) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position: Governmental activities: Taxes: 16,423,843 16,710,544 16,893,629 17,823,858 20,697,081 Property taxes 11,230,915 8,079,394 11,847,139 18,365,424 19,262,569 Transient occupancy taxes 20,905,243 19,136,015 23,323,549 28,204,906 28,888,079 Sales tax 2,032,848 1,996,593 2,055,505 2,240,468 2,375,729 Franchise taxes 418,707 378,744 383,551 446,745 489,738 Business license taxes 713,237 662,545 1,568,997 1,352,585 926,743 Othertaxes 4,086,536 4,290,417 4,376,455 4,663,327 5,110,569 Motor vehicle in lieu, unrestricted 5,150,613 5,110,358 1,427,664 219,164 5,058,717 Investment income (5,727,183) (1,519,171) Net Increase (Decrease) of Investment Fair Value 394,347 1,404,143 1,457,788 943,160 1,432,619 Miscellaneous (5,553,561) - - - - Special Item (interfund loan payoff) 993148 867792 739933 609,515 - Extraordinary gain/loss on dissolution of RDA (450:000) (635:200) (875:000) (550,000) (600,000) Transfers 56,345,876 58,001,345 63,199,210 68,591,969 82,122,673 Total governmental activities Business -type activities: 14,958 9,356 13,081 4,329 12,456 Investment income (45,279) 20,665 Net Increase (Decrease) of Investment Fair Value 5,553,561 - - - - Miscellaneous 450,000 6351200 875,000 5505000 600,000 Transfers 6,018,519 644,556 888,081 509,050 633,121 Total business -type activities 62,364,395 5 5, 9'r 69,1015019 $2,755,794 Total Primary Government Changes in Net Position 21,552,482 (4,424,340) 30,605,239 29,585,150 35,135,355 Governmental activities 5,232,993 (756,886) 227,891 441,932 (119,763) Business -type activities 26,785,475 (5,181,226) 30,833,130 30,027,082 35,015,592 Total Primary Government 131 393 Expenses General government Public safety Planning and development Community services Public works Interest on long-term debt Total Governmental Activities Expenditures Program Revenues Charges for services: General government Public safety Planning and development Community services Public works Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions Total Governmental Activities Program Revenues Net Revenues (Expenditures) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position Taxes: Property taxes Transient occupancy taxes Sales tax Franchise tax Business license taxes Othertax Motor vehicle in lieu, unrestricted Investment income Net Increase (Decrease) of Investment Fair Value Gain (loss) on sale of capital assets Miscellaneous Special item (interfund loan payoff) Extraordinary gain/loss on dissolution of RDA Transfers Total Governmental Activities Changes in Net Position Source: City of La Quinta City of La Quinta Changes in Net Position - Governmental Activities (Table 3) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $ 4,830,239 $ 5,166,732 $ 5,645,004 $ 5,565,727 $ 8,869,174 21,169,423 21,636,149 22,067,603 23,378,824 22,508,088 3,098,015 2,212,013 3,359,732 2,882,321 4,352,134 4,130,085 5,992,362 6,214,098 6,584,268 9,231,268 12,610, 994 18,116, 732 12,157,245 10,927,160 15,580,975 405,977 340,716 343,129 309,463 1,468,971 46,244,733 53,464,704 49,786,811 49,647,763 62,010,610 71,042 121,140 192,538 504,127 883,153 1,412,819 1,655,421 1,378,704 341,368 367,848 595,980 489,589 467,053 564,327 724,499 1,224,719 307,869 386,824 453,098 442,656 1,195,703 1,197,069 1,134,630 741,703 1,054,902 14,587,153 16,829,107 12,213,338 6,187,803 4,259,916 3,981,286 3,536,444 1,076,145 3,316,153 4,455,060 23,068,702 24,136,639 16,849,232 12,108,579 12,188,034 (23,176,031) (29,328,065) (32,937,579) (37,539,184) (49,822,576) 9,193,753 8,776,491 8,798,296 15,521,335 15,887,015 6,307,737 6,637,183 7,835,745 9,433,970 10,752,788 8,786,819 8,873,008 9,107,046 10,060,305 18,956,985 1,688,263 1,861,453 1,799,938 1,815,491 1,977,179 307,654 306,087 334,465 365,451 345,187 580,834 530,336 516,964 585,333 718,472 3,291,042 3,486,367 3,651,549 3,813,213 3,941,348 2,190,357 1,981,343 2,390,468 442,710 803,654 - - 376,193 460,614 649,566 243,498 296,346 - - - (6,402,450) - 7,344,050 3,624,121 (500,000) (247,739) (115,400) (401,300) (434,000) 25,687,507 32,500,875 34,695,264 49,441,172 57,222,315 2,511,476 3,172,810 1,757,685 11,901,988 7,399,739 132 394 City of La Quinta Changes in Net Position - Governmental Activities (Table 3) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $ 9,085,863 $ 9,877,251 $ 8,106,209 $ 9,732,445 $ 17,213,248 23,164,976 24,009,725 24,429,310 25,741,782 25,457,350 5,913,321 5,845,836 6,508,522 4,716,745 3,146,264 6,202,084 11,362,950 6,958,234 8,439,863 9,550,001 4,430,519 32,248,031 11,438,197 14,985,480 14,043,797 210,941 98,049 42,081 11,914 25,504 49,007,703 83,441,842 57,482,553 63,628,229 69,436,164 516,115 615,348 1,541,535 1,402,810 1,716,965 376,249 367,277 770,760 648,914 555,423 636,683 799,040 710,529 1,315,760 1,356,426 479,542 366,896 178,554 137,769 185,979 1,119,816 1,436,362 1,503,633 3,378,132 2,736,907 5,623,509 7,817,482 4,413,523 5,786,773 7,136,358 5,462,395 9,613,752 15,770,048 11,952,031 8,760,788 14,214,310 21,016,157 24,888,582 24,622,189 22,448,846 Expenditures: General government Public safety Planning and development Community services Public works Interest on long-term debt Total Governmental Activities Expenditures Program Revenues: Charges for services: General government Public safety Planning and development Community services Public works Operating grants and contributions Capital grants and contributions Total Governmental Activities Program Revenues (34,793,394) (62,425,685) (32,593,971) (39,006,040) (46,987,318) Net Revenues (Expenditures) General Revenues and other changes in Net Position: Taxes: 16,423,843 16,710,544 16,893,629 17,823,858 20,697,081 Property taxes 11,230,915 8,079,394 11,847,139 18,365,424 19,262,569 Transient occupancy taxes 20,905,243 19,136,015 23,323,549 28,204,906 28,888,079 Sales tax 2,032,848 1,996,593 2,055,505 2,240,468 2,375,729 Franchise tax 418,707 378,744 383,551 446,745 489,738 Business license taxes 713,237 662,545 1,568,997 1,352,585 926,743 Othertax 4,086,536 4,290,417 4,376,455 4,663,327 5,110,569 Motor vehicle in lieu, unrestricted 5,150,613 5,110,358 1,427,664 219,164 5,058,717 Investment income (5,727,183) (1,519,171) Net Increase (Decrease) of Investment Fair Value 394,347 1,404,143 1,457,788 942,381 - Gain (loss) on sale of capital assets - - - - 1,432,619 Miscellaneous (5,553,561) - - - - Special item (interfund loan payoff) 993,148 867,792 739,933 609,515 Extraordinary gain/loss on dissolution of RDA (450,000) (635,200) (875,000) (550,000) (600,000) Transfers 56,345,876 58,001,345 63,199,210 68,591,190 82,122,673 Total Governmental Activities 21,552,482 (4,424,340) 30,605,239 29,585,150 35,135,355 Changes in Net Position 133 395 City of La Quinta Changes in Net Position — Business -type Activities (Table 4) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Expenses Golf course $ 4,971,977 $ 5,053,360 $ 4,373,586 $ 3,965,644 $ 4,318,463 Total Business -Type Activities Expenditures 4,971,977 5,053,360 4,373,586 3,965,644 4,318,463 Program revenues Charges for services: Golf course 3,481,424 3,561,857 3,621,495 3,446,340 3,567,718 Capital grants and contributions - 2,872,122 - - - Total Business -Type Activities Program Revenues 3,481,424 6,433,979 3,621,495 3,446,340 3,567,718 Net Revenues (Expenditures) (1,490,553) 1,380,619 (752,091) (519,304) (750,745) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position Investment income 1,567 2,043 4,282 2,028 3,511 Net Increase (Decrease) of Investment Fair Value - - - - - Miscellaneous 678,046 915,164 218,823 - - Transfers 500,000 247,739 115,400 401,300 434,000 Total Business -Type Activities 1,179,613 1,164,946 338,505 403,328 437,511 Changes in Net Position (310,940) 2,545,565 (413,586) (115,976) (313,234) Source: City of La Quinta 134 396 City of La Quinta Changes in Net Position — Business -type Activities (Table 4) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Expenditures: $ 4,558,922 $ 4,148,190 $ 4,169,286 $ 4,746,281 $ 5,520,342 Golf course 4,558,922 4,148,190 4,169,286 4,746,281 5,520,342 Total Business -Type Activities Expenditures Program revenues: Charges for services: 3,773,396 2,746,748 3,509,096 4,679,163 4,767,458 Golf course - - - - - Capital grants and contributions 3,773,396 2,746,748 3,509,096 4,679,163 4,767,458 Total Business -Type Activities Program Revenues (785,526) (1,401,442) (660,190) (67,118) (752,884) Net Revenues (Expenditures) General Revenues and Other Changes in Net Position: 14,958 9,356 13,081 4,329 12,456 Investment income - - - (45,279) 20,665 Net Increase (Decrease) of Investment Fair Value 5,553,561 - - - - Miscellaneous 450,000 635,200 875,000 550,000 600,000 Transfers 6,018,519 644,556 888,081 509,050 633,121 Total Business -Type Activities 5,232,993 (756,886) 227,891 441,932 (119,763) Changes in Net Position 135 397 City of La Quinta Fund Balances of Governmental Funds (Table 5) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016(') 2017 2018 General fund Nonspendable: Prepaid costs $ 1,500 $ 15,653 $ 204,589 $ 10,578 $ 90,657 Land held for resale 8,320,000 8,320,000 8,320,000 8,320,000 8,320,000 Advances to other funds 15,163,183 14,943,098 14,974,800 15,022,660 14,954,085 Deposits 4,830 33,985 - - - Due from Other Governments 34,976,516 26,715,575 25,105,681 29,154,040 29,611,707 Restricted for: Section 115 Trust (Note 11) Committed: Emergency Reserve(2) 16,034,995 15,372,600 15,576,000 16,534,000 - Natural Disaster Reserve(2) - - - - 7,400,000 Economic Disaster Reserve(2) - - - - 8,140,000 Post retirement health benefits(3) 1,523,401 1,523,401 1,523,400 1,523,400 - Capital Replacement Reserve(2) 1,507,429 1,727,390 2,302,000 - 5,000,000 Cash Flow Reserve(2) 2,836,820 3,843,150 3,894,000 4,134,000 5,000,000 Pension Trust(4) - - - - 2,000,000 Carryovers 356,438 476,400 4,274,046 120,000 2,186,500 Assigned: Continuing appropriations 209,000 - - - - Public Safety (Note 14) - 9,371,699 9,754,327 Sales Tax Reserve (Note 14) - 5,169,970 Capital Projects (Note 14) - - - 6,322,570 4,996,815 Unassigned 10,699,641 13, 837, 312 13,822,012 16,949,526 19,199, 506 Total general fund 91,633,753 86,808,564 98,565,571 107,462,473 121,823,567 All other governmental funds Nonspendable: Prepaid costs - - 8,422 10,349 - Restricted: Planning and development projects 5,970,006 13,108,499 18,211,200 22,664,093 22,607,600 Public safety 274,274 301,843 189,988 83,506 342,919 Community services 12,459,516 10,711,704 9,872,124 10,040,222 10,016,652 Public works 1,571,163 1,129,697 1,250,827 1,546,505 2,033,627 Capital Projects 1,590,168 3,873,699 3,597,221 4,490,534 4,203,991 Unassigned (12,370,462) (12,703,744) (11,655,344) (11,423,008) (11,347,062) Total all other governmental funds 9,494,665 16,421,698 21,474,438 27,412,201 27,857,727 Total Governmental Funds 101,128,418 103,230,262 120,040,009 134,874,674 149,681,294 Notes: 0)In Fiscal Year 2016-17, the City recognized property tax held by the County of Riverside as available to fund current obligations and as such the General Fund fund balance was adjusted up by 8,569,043 to 98,565,571. See Note 19 for FY 2016-17 (2) In Fiscal year 2017-18, the City adopted a reserves policy which modifed, added and/ or eliminated reserve category names. Emergency Reserves are now split into Natural Disaster and Economic Disaster, Working Capital Reserve was re -named Cash Flow Reserve, and Capital Replacement and Pension Trust were added. (3) In Fiscal Year 2017-18 the City opened a trust for Other Post Employment Benefits (OPEB), and this reserve was deposited into the trust. See Note 10. (4) In Fiscal Year 2018-19 the City opened a trust for Pension Benefits, and this reserve was deposited into the trust. See Note 11. 136 398 City of La Quinta Fund Balances of Governmental Funds (Table 5) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 General fund: Nonspendable: $ 37,182 $ 14,065 $ 25,246 $ 46,990 $ 125,993 Prepaid costs 5,730,990 5,403,652 5,403,652 5,403,652 5,403,652 Land held for resale - - - - - Advances to other funds - - - - - Deposits 27,915,770 26,069,742 24,070,622 21,915,347 19,600,793 Due from Other Governments Restricted for: 6,540,000 10,249,738 11,381,922 10,137,888 5,317,487 Section 115 Trust (Note 11) Committed: - - - - - Emergency Reserve(2) 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 Natural Disaster Reserve(2) 11,000,000 6,800,000 11,000,000 11,000,000 13,000,000 Economic Disaster Reserve(�) - - - - - Post retirement health benefits(3) 5,000,000 6,540,000 10,000,000 10,000,000 12,000,000 Capital Replacement Reserve(2) 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 5,000,000 Cash Flow Reservelzl - - - - Pension Trust(4) 745,300 1,778,800 1,209,870 1,209,100 2,600,009 Carryovers Assigned: - - - - - Continuing appropriations 9,864,841 10,491,654 11,423,931 11,183,821 11,986,970 Public Safety (Note 14) 7,721,975 8,736,219 15,128,658 15,355,043 29,214,191 Sales Tax Reserve (Note 14) 11,853,162 13,155,144 13,431,089 30,761,847 22,623,372 Capital Projects (Note 14) 16,228,627 19,094,651 24,241,553 33,893,325 44,105,041 Unassigned 117,637,847 123,333,665 142,316,543 165,907,013 185,977,508 Total general fund All other governmental funds: Nonspendable: 386 2,875 1,019 96,590 468 Prepaid costs Restricted: 22,996,435 23,680,641 24,751,443 25,118,552 27,585,913 Planning and development projects 1,391,721 1,607,101 931,352 1,073,419 1,278,307 Public safety 13,775,710 14,376,472 12,813,788 13,159,532 15,711,786 Community services 2,667,401 3,208,072 5,196,324 7,353,021 7,535,519 Public works 3,904,492 3,128,962 3,018,894 6,897,057 9,794,607 Capital Projects (1,852,211) (5,175,243) (3,182,262) (2,483,120) (8,064,140) Unassigned 42,883,934 40,828,880 43,530,558 51,215,051 53,842,460 Total all other governmental funds 160,521,781 164,162,545 185,847,101 217,122,064 239,819,968 Total Governmental Funds 137 399 City of La Quinta Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds (Table 6) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Revenues Taxes $ 27,192,089 $ 26,678,471 $ 28,057,989 $ 41,832,117 $ 44,931,250 Assessments 951,181 940,221 944,050 953,699 950,541 Licenses and permits 953,540 1,356,978 1,161,820 1,118,911 1,394,820 Intergovernmental 16,506,666 15,702,943 14,960,676 4,870,334 12,555,259 Charges for services 1,238,277 1,341,438 1,332,541 1,021,336 1,279,864 Use of money and property 2,175,048 1,950,957 7,475,742 4,659,301 2,388,683 Contributions, fines, and forfeitures 838,972 1,956,452 28,459 348,345 375,390 Developer participation 3,059,254 2,803,681 1,441,075 1,042,568 1,534,628 Miscellaneous 575,001 580,843 992,282 289,047 1,196,057 Total Revenues 53,490,028 53,311,984 56,394,634 56,135,658 66,606,492 Expenditures Current: General government 4,068,827 5,050,425 5,267,024 5,845,197 7,737,111 Public safety 21,189,086 21,664,472 22,125,962 23,377,755 22,508,088 Planning and development 1,748,477 2,097,525 3,294,259 2,549,779 4,310,589 Community services 4,011,432 4,798,123 4,983,038 4,626,401 5,236,083 Public works 4,617,050 5,283,309 4,101,210 4,025,958 4,146,135 Capital projects 7,974,747 11,097,186 7,209,874 6,859,428 9,015,861 Debt service: Principal retirement 558,019 594,383 632,615 651,625 666,988 Interest and fiscal charges 411,010 348,334 346,137 307,600 1,460,371 Total Expenditures 44,578,648 50,933,757 47,960,119 48,243,743 55,081,226 Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) Expenditures 8,911,380 2,378,227 8,434,515 7,891,915 11,525,266 Other financing sources (uses): Proceeds from sale of land - - - - - Transfers in 4,201,763 12,037,331 6,420,538 21,503,514 7,432,340 Transfers out (4,335,679) (12,322,714) (6,614,349) (21,904,814) (7,775,107) Capital Leases 9,000 Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) (133,916) (276,383) (193,811) (401,300) (342,767) Extraordinary gain/loss on dissolution of RDA (6,402,450) 7,344,050 3,624,121 Special item (interfund loan payoff) - - - - - Net Change in Fund Balances 2,375,014 2,101,844 8,240,704 14,834,665 14,806,620 Debt Service as a Percentage of Noncapital Expenditures (1) 2.6% 2.2% 2.4% 2.5% 3.3% Notes: (')The capitalizable expenditures were derived from the Reconciliation of the Statement of Revenues, Expenditures, and Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds and Note 4, Capital Assets. 138 400 City of La Quinta Changes in Fund Balances of Governmental Funds (Table 6) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Modified accrual basis of accounting) Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Revenues: $ 48,462,493 $ 44,881,038 $ 53,493,786 $ 65,107,160 $ 67,267,115 Taxes 961,633 957,017 984,435 969,257 981,315 Assessments 1,555,026 1,913,519 2,020,596 4,521,449 3,994,989 Licenses and permits 14,075,980 17,107,595 25,720,328 15,989,135 16,353,942 Intergovernmental 1,170,825 1,179,592 964,710 1,623,951 1,558,784 Charges for services 4,824,651 5,219,088 2,601,482 (3,545,192) 4,592,365 Use of money and property 375,491 665,193 779,606 657,589 563,494 Contributions, fines, and forfeitures 2,231,471 1,863,587 1,844,665 5,584,146 4,216,121 Developer participation 2,425,675 1,371,095 645,780 970,399 2,602,248 Miscellaneous 76,083,245 75,157,724 89,055,388 91,877,894 102,130,373 Total Revenues Expenditures Current: 10,129,408 7,732,495 8,464,230 10,515,771 20,967,405 General government 23,164,976 24,009,725 24,429,310 25,741,782 25,457,350 Public safety 6,415,466 5,436,281 6,544,477 5,234,065 6,503,091 Planning and development 5,944,200 6,159,707 5,583,420 6,325,904 8,063,457 Community services 4,219,461 5,421,606 5,287,280 5,654,080 6,470,613 Public works 9,096,460 23,150,511 18,219,385 7,167,446 14,180,312 Capital projects Debt service: 650,000 - - 10,705 10,764 Principal retirement 178,080 28,868 15,133 11,914 25,504 Interest and fiscal charges 59,798,051 71,939,193 68,543,235 60,661,667 81,678,496 Total Expenditures Excess (Deficiency) of Revenues Over (Under) 16,285,194 3,218,531 20,512,153 31,216,227 20,451,877 Expenditures Other financing sources (uses): - - 1,219,485 - - Proceeds from sale of land 12,942,596 16,467,409 10,781,267 6,131,440 10,079,550 Transfers in (13,826,890) (16,912,971) (11,568,281) (6,681,440) (10,679,550) Transfers out Capital Leases (884,294) (445,562) 432,471 (550,000) (600,000) Total Other Financing Sources (Uses) 993,148 867,792 739,933 609,515 Extraordinary gain/loss on dissolution of RDA (5,553,561) - - - Special item (interfund loan payoff) 10,840,487 3,640,761 21,684,557 31,275,742 19,851,877 Net Change in Fund Balances Debt Service as a Percentage of Noncapital 2.03% 0.06% 0.03% 0.06% 0.06% Expenditures i'i 139 401 City of La Quinta Tax Revenue by Source (Table 7) Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Property Transient Business Document Year Tax(i) Occupancy Tax Sales Tax Franchise Tax License Tax Transfer Tax Total 2014 9,193,753 6,307,737 8,786,819 1,688,263 307,654 580,834 26,865,060 2015 8,776,491 6,637,183 8,873,008 1,861,453 306,087 530,336 26,984,558 2016 8,798,296 7,835,745 9,107,046 1,799,938 334,465 516,964 28,392,454 2017 15,521,335 9,433,970 10,060,305 1,815,491 365,451 585,333 37,781,885 2018 15,887,015 10,752,788 18,956,985 1,977,179 345,187 718,472 48,637,626 2019 16,423,843 11,230,915 20,905,243 2,032,848 418,707 713,237 51,724,793 2020 16,710,544 8,079,394 19,136,015 1,996,593 378,744 662,545 46,963,835 2021 16,893,629 11,847,139 23,323,549 2,055,505 383,551 1,568,997 56,072,370 2022 17,823,858 18,365,424 28,204,906 2,240,468 446,745 1,352,585 68,433,986 2023 20,697,081 19,262,569 28,888,079 2,375,729 489,738 926,743 72,639,939 80,000,000 70,000,000 60,000,000 50,000,000 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 Tax Revenue by Source I I I I� JJ�■ 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 ■ Property Tax(1) ■ Transient Occupancy Tax ■ Sales Tax ■ Franchise Tax ■ Business License Tax ■ Document Transfer Tax Notes: (1) Starting in 2017, the revenue collected by the County that is remitted to the City for fire services is included in the property tax number. Source: City of La Quinta 140 402 City of La Quinta Top 25 Bradley -Burns Sales Tax Producers (Table 8) Current Year and Nine Years Ago (in dollars) Fiscal Year 2022-23 Fiscal Year 2013-14 Business Name (') Business Category Business Name (1) Business Category Arco AM PM Service Stations Arco AM/PM Service Stations Best Buy Electronics/Appliance Stores Bed Bath & Beyond Home Furnishings Circle K Service Stations Best Buy Electronics/Appliance Stores Cliffhouse Fine Dining Chevrolet Cadillac of La Quinta New Motor Vehicle Dealers Costco Discount Dept. Stores Circle K Service Stations Floor & Decor Building Materials Cliffhouse Fine Dining G&M Oil Service Stations Costco Discount Dept. Stores Genesis/Hyundai of La Quinta New Motor Vehicle Dealers G & M Oil Service Stations Hobby Lobby Specialty Stores Hyundai of La Quinta New Motor Vehicle Dealers Home Depot Building Materials Home Depot Building Materials In N Out Burger Quick -Service Restaurants Kohl's Department Stores Kohl's Department Stores La Quinta Resort & Club Hotels -Liquor La Quinta Chevrolet & Cadillac New Motor Vehicle Dealers Lowe's Building Materials La Quinta Resort & Club Hotels/Motels Marshalls Family Apparel Lowe's Building Materials Ralphs Grocery Stores Marshalls Family Apparel Ross Family Apparel PGA West Private Clubhouse Leisure/Entertainment Stater Bros Grocery Stores Ross Family Apparel Stein Mart Department Stores Target Discount Dept. Stores Stuft Pizza Bar & Grill Casual Dining TJ Maxx Family Apparel Target Discount Dept. Stores Torre Nissan New Motor Vehicle Dealers Torre Nissan New Motor Vehicle Dealers Tower Mart Service Stations Tower Mart Service Stations Ulta Beauty Specialty Stores USA Gas Service Stations Vons Grocery Stores Vintners Shell Station Service Stations Walmart Supercenter Discount Dept. Stores Walmart Supercenter Discount Dept. Stores Percent of Fiscal Year Total Paid by Top 25 Accounts: 64.81 % Percent of Fiscal Year Total Paid by Top 25 Accounts: 69.44% Combined Sales Tax Revenue (in millions) $0 i I I I I I I I I 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Notes: (1) Firms are listed alphabetically. State law does not allow for the disclosure of the sales tax revenue amounts by account. Top 25 businesses listed for state Bradley -Burns sales tax allocation only. For Top 25 business listings by local Measure G, see next page. Sales tax revenue chart includes total remitted for both. 141 403 This page intentionally left blank. 404 Fiscal Year 2022-23 Business Name l'l Business Category Amazon Fulfillment Services General Merchandise Amazon MFA General Merchandise Best Buy Electronics/Appliance Stores Circle K Service Stations Costco Discount Dept. Stores Dept. of Motor Vehicles Allocation Used Automotive Dealers Desert European Motor Cars New Motor Vehicle Dealers Ferrari of San Francisco New Motor Vehicle Dealers Floor & Decor Building Materials G & M Oil Service Stations Home Depot Building Materials Kohl's Department Stores La Quinta Resort & Club Hotels/Motels Lowe's Building Materials Marshalls Family Apparel Mathis Brothers Furniture Home Furnishings PGA West Private Clubhouse Leisure/Entertainment Ross Family Apparel Target Discount Dept Stores Tesla Motors New Motor Vehicle Dealers TJ Maxx Family Apparel Tower Mart Service Stations Verizon Wireless Electronics/Appliance Stores Vons Grocery Stores Walmart Supercenter Discount Dept. Stores Percent of Fiscal Year Total Paid by Top 25 Accounts: 44.41 % City of La Quinta Top 25 Measure G Sales Tax Producers (Table 9) Current Year and Nine Years Ago (in dollars) Fiscal Year 2013-14 Business Name Business Cateaory Measure G was passed in November 2016 and implemented on April 1, 2017. Ten-year is data not available. Notes: (1) Firms are listed alphabetically. State law does not allow for the disclosure of the sales tax revenue amounts by account. Source: HdL, Coren & Cone 142 405 Apparel stores General merchandise Food stores Eating and drinking places Building materials Auto dealers and supplies Service stations Other retail stores All other outlets Total Other retail 12% Service st. 6% Au City of La Quinta Taxable Sales by Category(l) (Table 10) Last Ten Calendar Years (in thousands) Calendar Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 $ 25,741 $ 25,461 $ 25,115 $ 26,280 $ 31,822 223,324 216,871 208,189 206,808 222,767 26,394 25,748 22,845 25,359 25,964 97,662 101,647 106,216 115,974 117,064 68,606 73,087 75,658 78,299 83,383 72,839 84,826 87,440 83,010 81,264 52,093 47,541 40,777 34,566 37,558 100,811 101,721 105,284 107,648 104,834 142,049 150,746 155,173 172,135 180,360 809,519 827,648 826,697 850,079 885,016 Taxable Sales Calendar Year 2012 n--I t-- 9% merchandise 28% :ood stores 3% <ing places 12% Notes: (1) Due to confidentiality issues preventing the disclosure of the largest sales tax payers by business name, this categorical list has been provided as an alternative source of information regarding the City of La Quinta's sales tax revenue. Source: HdL. Coren & Cone 143 406 City of La Quinta Taxable Sales by Category (Table 10) Last Ten Calendar Years (in dollars) Calendar Year 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 $ 34,508 $ 33,937 $ 24,929 $ 38,612 $ 39,992 232,147 235,969 235,841 274,045 300,399 26,126 26,191 30,610 30,350 32,324 122,255 132,184 100,187 149,526 169,175 86,569 89,036 111,231 128,048 135,282 82,702 85,401 78,189 105,011 100,165 42,164 42,998 33,742 46,985 56,830 114,980 111,239 101,620 140,854 139,870 210,360 220,260 222,916 260,247 298,944 951,811 977,215 939,265 1,173,678 1,272,981 Other retail 11% Service: 4°G Taxable Sales Calendar Year 2021 A-rol cf-- Building materials 11% Apparel stores General merchandise Food stores Eating and drinking places Building materials Auto dealers and supplies Service stations Other retail stores All other outlets Total andise d stores 3% drinking places 13% 144 407 City of La Quinta Assessed Value of Taxable Property (Table 11) Last Ten Fiscal Years (in dollars) City of La Quinta, Tax District 02-2375 Fiscal Year Ended Unsecured Home Owner Taxable Assessed Direct Rate June 30, Residential Commercial Agriculture(4) Other 19 Property (2) Exemptionlsl Value (3) 2014 8,959,562,854 743,340,208 20,374,889 945,004,639 108,387,013 (167,489,253) 10,776,669,603 1.0000 2015 10,116,938,804 1,061,204,501 65,769,114 77,926,274 106,672,900 (49,232,400) 11,379,279,193 1.0000 2016 10,634,834,332 1,088,406,355 64,533,443 79,120,572 113,142,376 (49,130,200) 11,930,906,878 1.0000 2017 11,071,273,174 1,195,736,674 57,463,638 71,281,946 110,768,767 (49,088,200) 12,457,435,999 1.0000 2018 11,462,635,317 1,227,709,957 59,538,912 61,350,883 105,984,928 (49,700,000) 12,867,519,997 1.0000 2019 11,869,224,686 1,288,839,436 61,861,498 85,526,307 95,584,154 (49,298,200) 13,351,737,881 1.0000 2020 12,394,924,833 1,292,239,063 91,242,090 139,850,650 110,001,629 (47,938,800) 13,980,319,465 1.0000 2021 12,962,202,378 755,379,455 62,798,676 537,520,834 89,135,215 (47,271,000) 14,359,765,558 1.0000 2022 13,470,995,430 758,841,326 59,428,116 816,367,506 104,233,962 (46,243,400) 15,163,622,940 1.0000 2023 14,665,975,863 823,683,645 65,165,909 1,047,386,146 110,581,331 (45,703,000) 16,667,089,894 1.0000 $17,000 $16,000 $15,000 $14,000 $13,000 $12,000 $11,000 $10,000 $9,000 $8,000 $7,000 $6,000 $5,000 $4,000 $3,000 $2,000 $1,000 $0 Taxable Assessed Value (in millions) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Notes: (1) Other includes dry farm, government owned, institutional, irrigated, miscellaneous, recreational, vacant, cross reference, and unknown. Starting in 2016, prior years 2007 through 2015 were adjusted to match current reporting categories for consistency. 121 Prior years 2012 through 2015 adjusted to match current reportingg for consistency. 131 In 1978 the voters of the State of California passed Proposition 13 which limited property taxes to a total maximum rate of 1 % based upon the assessed value of the property being taxed. Each year, the assessed value of property may be increased by an "inflation factor" (limited to a maximum increase of 2 % ). With few exceptions, property is only re -assessed at the time that it is sold to a new owner; at which time the new assessed value is the purchase price of the property sold. The assessed valuation data shown above represents only the data currently available with respect to the actual market value of taxable property and is subject to the limitations described above. (4) In 2016 (and going forward) data will be obtained from California Municipal and The Auditor -Controller's Office. The existing column headers were slightly modified to accommodate the property type classifications. The column labeled agriculture was formerly "industrial". (5) Prior to 2015, this column also included Exempt Property Valuations Source:: Cal Muni; County of Riverside Assessor Combined Tax Rolls Equalized Auditor and Assessor's Net; Riverside County Auditor -Controller 145 408 City of La Quinta Direct and Overlapping Property Tax Rates (Table 12) Last Ten Fiscal Years (Rate per $100 of assessed value) City Non -Project Area 20110) 2015(1) 2016(') 2017(') 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Direct Rates: City of La Quinta 0.0760 0.0760 0.0760 0.0760 0.0760 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 0.0646 ERAF Share of La Quinta General Fund 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0113 0.0113 0.0113 0.0113 0.0113 Redevelopment Agency Project Area 1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Redevelopment Agency Project Area 2 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 County of Riverside 0.1958 0.1958 0.1958 0.1958 0.1958 0.0978 0.0978 0.0978 0.0978 0.0978 ERAF Share of County 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0980 0.0980 0.0980 0.0980 0.0980 County Free Library 0.0253 0.0253 0.0253 0.0253 0.0253 0.0253 0.0253 0.0253 0.0253 0.0253 County Structure Fire Protection 0.0544 0.0544 0.0544 0.0544 0.0544 0.0544 0.0544 0.0544 0.0544 0.0544 Coachella Valley Unified School District 0.4322 0.4322 0.4322 0.4322 0.4322 0.4322 0.4322 0.4322 0.4322 0.4322 Desert Sands Unified School 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Desert Community College District 0.0698 0.0698 0.0698 0.0698 0.0698 0.0698 0.0698 0.0698 0.0698 0.0698 Riverside County Office of Education 0.0380 0.0380 0.0380 0.0380 0.0380 0.0380 0.0380 0.0380 0.0380 0.0380 Riverside County Regional Park & Open Spec( 0.0039 0.0039 0.0039 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 0.0040 CV Public Cemetery 0.0031 0.0031 0.0031 0.0031 0.0031 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 0.0032 CV Mosquito & Vector Control 0.0127 0.0127 0.0126 0.0126 0.0126 0.0126 0.0127 0.0127 0.0127 0.0127 Desert Recreation District 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 CVWD State Water Project 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 0.0254 CV Resource Conservation 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 0.0003 CVWD Improvement District 1 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 0.0118 CVWD Storm Water Unit 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 0.0321 Total Direct Rate 131 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Tax Rate Area 020-005 020-005 020-005 020-160 020.160 020-160 020.160 020-160 020-160 020-160 Overlapping Rates j4) : Coachella Valley Unified School District 0.1492 0.1492 0.1322 0.1660 0.1761 0.1495 0.1488 0.1455 0.1367 0.1345 Desert Sands Unified School 0.1095 0.1098 0.1092 0.0860 0.0725 0.0742 0.0738 0.0739 0.0750 0.0750 Coachella Valley Water District 0.1000 0.1000 0.1000 0.1000 0.1000 0.1000 0.1000 0.1000 0.1100 0.1100 Desert Community College District 0.0200 0.0233 0.0209 0.0204 0.0403 0.0398 0.0398 0.0395 0.0395 0.0395 Total Overlapping Rate 0.3787 0.3823 0.3622 0.3724 0.3889 0.3635 0.3624 0.3589 0.3611 0.3590 Total Direct and Overlapping Rate 1.3787 1.3823 1.3622 1.3724 1.3889 1.3635 1.3625 1.3589 1.3612 1.3590 Notes: )1) Direct rate from Tax Rate Area (TRA) 020-160 and overlapping rates provided by HdL, Coren & Cone; data source Riverside County Assessor 2012/13-2021/22 Annual Tax Increment (Rate) Tables. (2) Direct rate taken from an analysis of the TRA in the project area and does not include State ERAF deductions and overlapping rates provided by California Municipal Statistics )3) In 1978, California voters passed Proposition 13 which sets the property tax rate at a 1.00 % fixed amount for direct taxes. This 1 % is shared by all taxing agencies for which the subject property resides within. )4) Overlapping rates are based upon a single tax rate area only. Source: County of Riverside Auditor Controller's Office,- HdL, Coren & Cone 146 409 City of La Quinta Principal Property Taxpayers (Table 13) Current Year and Nine Years Ago (in dollars) Fiscal Year 2022-23 Fiscal Year 2013-14 Percent of Percent of Total City Total City Taxable Taxable Taxable Taxable Assessed Assessed Assessed Value Assessed Taxpayer Rank Value (') Value Rank (') Value HP LQ Investment LP 1 $ 211,499,603 1.27% - 0.00% The Hideaway Club 2 54,306,131 0.33% 0.00% Inland American La Quinta Pavilion 3 51,784,882 0.31% 4 44,267,502 0.41% HJ CG Partners 4 51,774,167 0.31% - 0.00% Hawthorn II Propco 5 47,159,732 0.28% 0.00% Mediterra La Quinta Owner LLC 6 37,588,387 0.23% 0.00% CM Wave Dev 7 36,155,993 0.22% - 0.00% Walmart Real Estate Business Trust 8 32,998,572 0.20% 8 28,905,663 0.27% SilverRock Phase I LLC 9 32,580,882 0.20% - 0.00% Aventine Dev 10 28,217,348 0.17% 9 24,316,859 0.23% LQR Golf LLC - 1 187,262,071 1.74% TD Desert Development LP 2 66,184,018 0.61 % East Of Madison 3 52,669,611 0.49% Coral Option 1 5 43,458,609 0.40% Lennar Homes of California 6 30,530,804 0.28% Town and Country Partners 7 30,170,000 0.28% Costco Wholesale Corp - 10 22,877,221 0.21% Total $ 584,065,697 3.50% 530,642,358 4.92% Principal Property Tax Payers FY 2022-23 SilverRock Phase I LLC Walmart Real Estate Business Trust CM Wavel Mediterra La Qui Owner LLC Hawthorn II Pr Inland American La Quinta Pavilion HP LQ Investment LP ub (1) Taxable valuations include secured and unsecured Source: HdL, Coren & Cone; Riverside County Assessor 2013114 and 2022123 Combined Tax Rolls and the SBE Non -Unitary Tax Roll (Preliminary) 147 410 City of La Quinta Property Tax Levies and Collections (Table 14) Last Ten Fiscal Years (in dollars) Collections within the Fiscal Year of Levy Total Collections to Date Taxes Levied Collections in Fiscal Year Ended for the Fiscal Subsequent Percent of June 30 Year M Amount Percent of Levy Years (2) Amount (3) Levy 2014 5,814,571 5,808,387 99.89% 202,342 6,010,729 103.37% 2015 5,965,704 6,100,655 102.26% 170,306 6,270,961 105.12% 2016 6,657,414 6,420,215 96.44% 194,668 6,614,883 99.36% 2017 6,764,963 6,592,548 97.45% 137,921 6,730,469 99.49% 2018 6,868,411 6,717,291 97.80% 116,182 6,833,473 99.49% 2019 6,934,311 6,736,814 97.15% 126,876 6,863,690 98.98% 2020(4) 7,058,939 6,777,777 96.02% 156,792 6,934,570 98.24% 2021 7,139,091 6,891,637 96.53% 106,190 6,997,827 98.02% 2022 7,291,506 7,140,010 97.92% 163,569 7,303,579 100.17% 2023 7,925,552 7,845,743 98.99% 118,092 7,963,835 100.48% $8 $7 $6 $5 $4 $3 $2 $1 $0 Property Tax Collections (in millions) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020(4) 2021 2022 2023 Notes: (1) Taxes Levied. The total tax levy is based on the Statement of Original Charge from the Riverside County Auditor -Controller Office. The amount presented include City property taxes for tax districts 02-2374 and 02-2375 and are not inclusive of the redevelopment increment values. (2) Collections in Subsequent Years. The City participates in the Riverside County Teeter program; the secured taxes are remitted in a series of advances and settlement payments, the last of which is not received by the City until October of the subsequent year. (3) Collections to Date. The total amount does not include any apportionment adjustments that are the result of successful appeals of a taxpayer assessed valuation, escaped bills, refunds, or any other adjustments made by the County Auditor -Controller. As such, the percentage of the levy collected may be higher or lower than expected. Additionally, the increment values of the former Redevelopment Agency are allocated through a waterfall distribution process in accordance with California Health and Safety Code 34183 and 34188, and are not reflected on the Statement of Original Charge. (4)The statement of original charge that was posted on the the Auditor-Conroller (ACO) website had not been updated at time of publishing the 19/20 CAFR. The number reported in the'taxes levied' column has now been adjusted to accurately reflect the ACO number, which subsequently changed the percent collected as well. Source: County of Riverside Auditor Controller's Office 148 411 Governmental Activities: Leases Financed Purchases USDA Loan Provident Savings Loan Notes Payable- Eisenhower Drive Property Subscription IT Liabilities City Hall Lease Revenue Bonds Total Governmental Business -type Activities: Leases(i) Total Business -Type Activities City of La Quinta Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type (Table 15) Last Ten Fiscal Years (in dollars) Fiscal Year Ended 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $ 129,063 $ 103,869 $ 155,395 $ 530,163 $ 667,035 686,345 668,933 649,698 628,448 1,405, 755 1,367,344 1,325,596 1,280, 221 - - - - 2,250,000 1,125,000 2,930,000 2,405,000 1,850,000 1,265,000 650,000 Total Primary Government 5,151,163 4,545,146 3,980,689 5,953,832 2,442,035 Population - State Department of Finance January 1 39,032 39,694 39,977 40,677 41,204 Number of Households 23,871 24,150 24,432 24,544 24,643 Median Household Income 109,365 97,526 99,157 104,749 107,447 Percentage of Personal Income 0.20% 0.19% 0.16% 0.23% 0.09% Debt Per Capita 132 115 100 146 59 Notes: (1) Details regarding the City's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. Leases for business -type activities were added in FY 2022 as a result of GASB 87. Subscription IT Liabilities for governmental activities were added in FY 2023 as a result of GASB 96. (2) Taxonomy changed from capital lease to leases Source: City of La Quinta; HDL, Coren & Cone 149 412 City of La Quinta Ratios of Outstanding Debt by Type (Table 15) Last Ten Fiscal Years (in dollars) Fiscal Year Ended 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Governmental Activities: $ 757,971 $ 761,790 $ 418,050 $ 162,648 $ 53,111 Leases(2) - - 41,225 22,079 551 Financed Purchases - - - USDA Loan Provident Savings Loan Notes Payable- Eisenhower Drive Property 495,674 Subscription IT Liabilities(') - - - - - City Hall Lease Revenue Bonds 757,971 761,790 459,275 184,727 549,336 Total Governmental Business -type Activities: - - - 565,837 315,520 Leases(l) - - - 565,837 315,520 Total Business -Type Activities 757,971 761,790 459,275 750,564 864,856 Total Primary Government 40,389 40,660 41,247 37,860 37,979 Population - State Department of Finance January 1 24,764 24,957 25,177 23,796 24,233 Number of Households 117,802 120,097 121,816 119,479 130,398 Median Household Income 0.03% 0.00% 0.01% 0.03% 0.03% Percentage of Personal Income 19 - 11 20 23 Debt Per Capita 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 2014 2015 Debt Per Capita 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 150 413 City of La Quinta Ratio of General Bonded Debt Outstanding (Table 16) Last Ten Fiscal Years (in dollars) Outstandina General Bonded Debt (') Fiscal Year City Hall Percent of Per Median Ended June Lease Local Agency Tax Allocation Assessed Household 30, Obligation Bonds Bonds Total Value (2) Income 2014 2,930,000 2,930,000 0.03% 27 2015 2,405,000 2,405,000 0.02% 20 2016 1,850,000 1,850,000 0.02% 45 2017 1,265,000 1,265,000 0.01% 31 2018 650,000 - 650,000 0.01% 6 2019 - - - 0.00% 2020 - - 0.00% 2021 - - 0.00% 2022 - - 0.00% 2023 - - 0.00% General Bonded Debt as a Percent of Assessed Value 2.50% 2.00% 1.50% 1.00% 0.50% 0.00% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Notes: (1) General bonded debt is debt payable with governmental fund resources and general obligation bonds recorded in enterprise funds (of which the City has none) (2) Assessed value has been used because the actual value of taxable property is not readily available in the State of California. Source: City of La Quinta 151 414 Total Assessed Valuation I'I $ 16,712,792,894 Overlapping Debt (3) Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt Desert Community College District Coachella Valley Unified School District Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) DSUSD Community Facilities District No. 1 Coachella Valley Water District Assessment District 68 Total Overlapping Tax and Assessment Debt Overlapping General Fund Debt Riverside County General Fund Obligations Riverside County Pension Obligations Coachella Valley Unified School District Certificates of Participation (COP) Desert Sands Unified School District COP Desert Recreation District General Fund Obligations Total Overlapping General Fund Debt Overlapping Tax Increment Debt Successor Agencies Total Overlapping Tax Increment Debt Total Gross Overlapping Debt Less: Riverside County Supported Obligations Total Net Overlapping Debt Direct General Fund Debt City of La Quinta General Fund Obligations Total Direct General Fund Debt Total Net Combined Direct and Overlapping Debt City of La Quinta Direct and Overlapping Debt (Table 17) June 30, 2023 (in dollars) Percentage Outstanding Debt Estimated Share of Applicable (2) 6/30/23 Overlapping Debt 16.51 % $ 486,615,000 $ 80,354,735 50.87 % 217,263,949 110,526,516 20.32% 365,405,000 74,253,950 88.91 % 445,000 395,658 86.46% 665,000 574,926 266,105,785 4.62% $ 686,776,829 $ 31,694,751 4.62% 748,540,000 34,545,121 50.87% 37,188, 380 18,918,473 20.32% 13,785,000 2,801,250 26.86% 1,389, 522 373,281 88,332,876 12.99%-100% 459,067,321 282,940,743 Notes: I'ITotal assessed valuation is from the Equalized Assessor reportwhich includes homeowner exemptions. 637,379,404 637,379,404 $ 549,336 549,336 549,336 D W1,92?3,14U (2) For debt repaid with property taxes, the percentage of overlapping debt applicable is estimated using taxable assessed property values. Applicable percentages were estimated by determining the portion of the overlapping district's taxable assessed value that is within the city's boundaries divided by the district's total taxable assessed value (3) Overlapping governments are those that coincide, at least in part, with the geographic boundaries of the City. This schedule estimates the portion of the outstanding debt of those overlapping governments that is borne by the residents and businesses of the City. This process recognizes that, when considering the City's ability to issue and repay long-term debt, the entire debt burden borne by the residents and businesses should betaken into account. However, this does not imply that every taxpayer is a resident, and therefore responsible for repaying the debt of each overlapping government. 152 415 Assessed valuation (1) Conversion Percentage Adjusted assessed valuation(2) Debt limit percentage "I Debt limit Total net debt applicable to limit General obligation bonds (3) Legal debt margin Total debt applicable to the limit as a percentage of debt limit City of La Quinta Legal Debt Margin Information (Table 18) Last Ten Fiscal Years (in dollars) Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 $ 10,726,752,603 $ 11,369,346,292 $ 11,930,906,878 $ 12,457,435,999 $ 12,867,519,997 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 2,681,688,151 2,842,336,573 2,982,726,720 3,114,359,000 3,216,879,999 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% 402,253,223 426,350,486 447,409,008 467,153,850 482,532,000 $ 402,253,223 $ 426,350,486 $ 447,409,008 $ 467,153,850 $ 482,532,000 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% Notes: O)Assessed Valuation is from the Equalized Auditor's Net report which excludes the homeowner exemptions (2) Section 43605 of the Government Code of the State of California limits the amount of indebtedness for public improvements to 15% of the gross assessed valuation or property. However, this provision was enacted when assessed valuation was based on 25% of market value. Effective with the 1981-82 fiscal year, each parcel is now assessed at 100% of market value (as of the most recent change in ownership for that parcel). The computations shown above reflect a conversion of assessed valuation data for each fiscal year from the current full valuation perspective to the 25% level that was in effect at the time that the legal debt margin was enacted by the State. This is the equivalent of 3.75% of the full assessed value. (3) The City of La Quinta has no general bonded indebtedness 153 416 City of La Quinta Legal Debt Margin Information (Table 18) Last Ten Fiscal Years (in dollars) Fiscal Year 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 $ 13,351,737,881 $ 13,980,319,465 $ 14,359,765,558 $ 15,163,622,940 $ 16,667,089,894 Assessed valuation l 25% 25% 25% 25% 25% 3,337,934,470 3,495,079,866 3,589,941,390 3,790,905,735 4,166,772,474 15% 15% 15% 15% 15% Debt limit percentage V) 500,690,171 524,261,980 538,491,208 568,635,860 625,015,871 Debt limit Total net debt applicable to limit - - - - - General obligation bonds (3) $ 500,690,171 $ 524,261,980 $ 538,491,208 $ 568,635,860 $ 625,015,871 Legal debt margin Total debt applicable to the limit 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% as a percentage of debt limit 154 417 City of La Quinta Pledged -Revenue Coverages�1 (Table 19) Last Ten Fiscal Years (in dollars) Local Agency Revenue Bonds (City Hall Project) Less Other Fiscal Year Lease Debt Net Lease Debt Service Coverage Ended June 30, Revenue (2) Payments Revenue Principal Interest Ratio (3) 2014 671,351 - 671,351 495,000 176,351 1.00 2015 673,046 - 673,046 525,000 148,046 1.00 2016 673,075 - 673,075 555,000 118,076 1.00 2017 671,441 - 671,441 585,000 86,441 1.00 2018 668,141 - 668,141 615,000 53,141 1.00 2019 668,038 - 668,038 650,000 18,038 1.00 2020 - - - - - - 2021 - - - - 2022 - - - - 2023 - - - - Notes: (1) Details regarding the city's outstanding debt can be found in the notes to the financial statements. The City of La Quinta has no general bonded indebtedness. (2) Lease revenue consist of payments from the City General Fund and Civic Center Development Impact Fee Fund. (3) Coverage ratio is a measure of the City's ability to meet its obligation. A ratio of greater than or equal to one indicates that sufficient revenue has been generated to satisfy the debt service requirements. The ratio is calculated as total available revenue (net lease revenue) divided by total debt service requirements (principal and interest) . Source: City of La Quinta 155 418 City of La Quinta Demographic and Economic Statistics (Table 20) Last Ten Calendar Years Calendar Year Sources 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 City Land (Sq Miles) (3) 35.16 35.71 35.71 35.71 35.71 35.71 35.71 35.71 35.71 35.71 Population (1)(3) 38,689 39,240 39,769 40,065 40,217 40,389 40,660 41,247 37,860 37,979 Mean Household Income (in dollars) (4) $109,365 $97,526 $99,157 $104,749 $107,447 $117,802 $120,097 $121,816 $119,479 $130,398 Number of Dwelling Units (1) 23,871 24,150 24,432 24,544 24,643 24,764 24,957 25,177 23,796 24,233 Persons per Household (1) 2.59 2.60 2.62 2.64 2.63 2.68 2.60 2.60 2.60 2.34 Per Capita Income (3) $42,226 $37,510 $37,846 $39,288 $39,999 $42,931 $46,248 $47,986 $52,632 $53,899 Labor Force (2) 16,983 17,483 18,033 18,617 18,917 19,142 19,267 19,083 19,850 19,942 Employment (2) 16,000 16,675 17,175 17,533 18,000 18,308 17,800 17,483 18,892 19,175 Unemployment Rate (2) 5.79 % 4.62 % 4.76 % 5.82 % 4.85 % 4.36 % 7.61 % 8.44 % 4.83 % 3.85 % Median age (3) 44.8 45.1 45.3 45.7 46 46.4 47.1 47.9 48.6 49.6 Mean Household Income $140,000 $120,000 $100,000 $80,000 $60,000 $40,000 $20,000 $0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Number of Dwelling Units 27,000 24,500 22,000 19,500 17,000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Unemployment Rate 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 - 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 5.00% 6.00% 7.00% 8.00% 9.00% Per Capita Income and Unemployment $60,000 $50,000 $40,000 $30,000 $20,000 $10,000 $0 9.00% 8.00% 7.00% 6.00% 5.00% 4.00% 3.00% 2.00% 1.00% 0.00% 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 -Per Capita Income -Unemployment Rate Sources. (1) State of California Department of Finance; State of California, Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties and the State, Sacramento, California, released May 2022. The estimates incorporate 2020 Census counts. (2) State of California Employment Development Department Website. Previous years' data updated in 2018/19 to utilize 12-month average and final numbers. Rise in average unemployment rate for 2019/20 was due to double digit unemployment at end of fiscal year due to the Coronavirus pandemic. (3) HdL, Coren & Cone (4) Mean Household Income from US Census Bureau report Table S1901. Previously, calculated using "Persons per Household" mulitplied by "Per Capita Income". Starting in 2017, data is from the US Census Bureau American Fact Finder. 156 419 City of La Quinta Principal Employers (Table 21) Current Year and Nine Years Ago Fiscal Year 2022-23 Fiscal Year 2013-14 Percent of Percent of Number of Total Number of Total Employer Activity Employees Employment Rank Employees Employment (')Desert Sands Unified School District Government 1 1000-4999 5.01-25.07% 3 1,180 7.92 % (2)PGA West and Citrus Club Golf Resort 1 1000-4999 5.01-25.07% 2 1,198 8.04% La Quinta Resort Golf Resort 3 500-999 2.51-5.01% 1 1,250 8.39% Costco Retailer 2 250-499 1.25-2.50% 5 246 1.65% Wal-Mart Super Center Retailer 2 250-499 1.25-2.50% 4 352 2.36% Eisenhower George & Julia Argyros Center Healthcare 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% Hideaway Club Golf Resort 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% Home Depot Retailer 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% 7 168 1.13% Homesmart Professionals Real Estate 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% Kohl's Retailer 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% Lowe's Retailer 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% 8 153 1.03% Madison Club Golf Resort 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% Quarry at La Quinta Golf Resort 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% Rancho La Quinta Golf Resort 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% 6 175 1.17 % Stater Bros Retailer 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% 10 114 0.77 % Target Retailer 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% Traditions Properties Golf Resort 3 100-249 0.50-1.25% Total employment listed 4,200-14,983 21.06-75.13% 5,077 34.07% Total City Employment - July 1 19,942 14,900 Notes: For fiscal year 2022-23, the City has changed the formatting of employment reporting to reflect a category'range' that businesses fall into, rather than an exact number. It was becoming increasingly difficult to obtain employment numbers from some local establishments as this is considered proprietary information. Additionally, this data format matches what is reported by the EDD and sourced from Data Axle. Reporting in this manner reflects the true seasonality of many of the jobs in our community, as employment at many of these firms is likely highest in the winter months when the population is at its peak. (')Desert Sands Unified employs approximately 4,000 people district -wide, of which the following locations are located in La Quinta: the District Administrative Offices, La Quinta High School, La Quinta Middle School, Benjamin Franklin Elementary, and Truman Elementary (2) PGA West and Citrus Club are accounted for as one entity and as such, their employment numbers are reported together; the combined entities account for 9 golf courses, 5 clubhouses, 2 private clubs, and multiple restaurants. Source: Data Axle, Linkedln, company websites, California EDD 157 420 City of La Quinta Full-time City Employees by Function (Table 22) Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year Function 20110) 2015 2016I21 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021i'I 2022 2023 Administration -City Mgr. Office 8.00 7.00 4.00 4.00 5.00 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 City Clerk 4.00 4.00 3.00 3.00 5.00 5.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 6.00 Finance 7.00 8.00 7.00 7.00 8.00 8.00 8.00 9.00 9.00 9.00 Community Services 12.00 11.65 - - - - - - - - Building and Safety - - Planning and Development - - - - - - - - - - Community Development 19.00 20.00 - - - - - - - - Public Works 20.00 21.35 - - - - - 27.00 27.00 27.00 Community Resources cal - - 18.00 18.00 18.00 18.00 23.00 19.00 20.00 21.00 Design and Development t61 - - 27.00 27.00 29.00 32.00 33.00 18.00 18.00 20.00 Facilities I0I - - 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 19.00 - - - Total 70.00 72.00 78.00 78.00 84.00 89.00 95.00 85.00 86.00 91.00 100.00 90.00 80.00 70.00 60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00 10.00 Notes Total Full -Time City Employees 2014(1) 2015 2016(2) 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021(3) 2022 2023 The City of La Quinta contracts with the County of Riverside for Police Services and with the California Department of Forestry through a contract with the County of Riverside for Fire Services. In addition, the City -owned Golf Course is operated by Landmark Golf. These positions have not been included as these positions are not City employees. (') The City merged the Building and Safety Department with the Planning and Development Department in 2014. The resultant department was referred to as Community Development until 2016, see below. (2) During FY 2015-16 the City was subject to a major reorganization in an attempt to improve efficiency and controls that effectively terminated the Community Services, Community Development, and Public Works departments. Following is a brief description of the reorganization for each department: a) The Community Resources department has taken over specific roles of the prior Community Development and Community Services departments including, but not limited to human resources, police, fire, library, museum, recreation, marketing, code compliance, animal control, and emergency services. b) The Design and Development department has taken over specific roles of the prior Community Development, Public Works, and Finance departments including, but not limited to customer service, business and animal licensing, planning, building, engineering services, and development services. c) The Facilities department has taken over specific roles of the prior Community Services and Public Works departments including, but not limited to, parks, streets, buildings, lighting and landscaping. (3) During the FY 2020-21 the City created the Public Works Division, consisting of the Facilities Division as well as Public Works, Engineering, and Capital Improvement (which were moved out of Design & Development). In addition, there were impacts due to the novel Coronavirus pandemic that led to a reduction in workforce. Source, City of La Quinta 158 421 City of La Quinta Operating Indicators by Function (Table 23) Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020n) 2021131 2022 2023 Finance: Number of Animal Licenses Processed I'l 1,602 1,374 - - - - - - - - Number ofAccounts Payable Checks Processed 3,696 3,833 4,153 3,835 3,621 3,879 3,855 2,998 3,014 3,196 Number of investment purchases 22 21 22 20 61 56 49 32 93 98 Par value of investments $ 136,323,300 $ 128,990,447 $ 137,594,669 $ 139,613,063 $ 150,117,079 $ 163,665,838 $ 170,194,404 $ 187,171,960 $ 223,319,336 $ 248,005,525 Number of cleared checks 3,922 4,004 4,167 3,932 3,813 3,875 3,962 2,977 2,989 3,078 Number of bank wires, drafts, and EFTsl4i 58 54 41 44 64 68 57 412 504 568 City Clerk: Contracts Processed 289 238 282 199 243 266 297 217 232 226 Documents Notarized 334 203 157 99 128 74 90 184 256 143 Documents Recorded with County 183 106 112 56 67 45 39 43 150 91 Subpoenas and Claims Processed 21 37 10 8 12 18 15 15 18 27 Records Requests Fulfilled and Recorded 601 580 518 743 572 602 633 847 1,205 1,201 Pages of Electronic Documents Archived') 34,671 164,847 233,182 214,384 593,991 970,894 753,291 190,113 176,426 131,141 Public Works: Encroachment permits issued 109 127 54 123 121 140 121 138 196 163 Request for services l'i 1322 1261 3,440 3,207 2,652 2,194 1,938 2,041 1,732 2,983 Community Development: Number of Active Business Licenses "I 3,998 4,452 3,368 3,681 3,707 3,806 3,592 3,267 3,414 3,630 Permits: Single family Detached 147 176 108 92 142 122 218 157 467 407 Single family Attached - 4 7.00 7.00 6 14 1 0 27 4 Residential Pool 204 255 217 170 211 243 237 337 424 369 Wall/Fence 220 328 257 209 268 223 312 244 412 504 Other 1,158 1,316 1,230 1,258 1,571 1,655 1,401 1,619 2,192 2,474 Garage Sale Permits l'I 1,255 1,290 1,109 1,024 928 959 604 351 461 343 Total Permits 2,984 3,369 2,928 2,760 3,126 3,216 2,773 2,708 3,983 4,101 Code Compliance I'I: Animal Control Incidents Handled i'l 1,645 1,085 0 - - 52 42 30 10 19 Vehicle abatements 88 85 255 212 224 184 149 79 114 108 Weed abatements 43 45 57 114 128 80 65 53 74 44 Nuisance abatements/Property Maintenance 730 557 1,037 1,180 1,122 921 821 403 952 776 All Other'2I - - 1,432 806 888 1,159 1,591 1,511 1,320 1,071 Community Services: Library activities: Number of Visits 71,874 73,924 182,913 190,747 152,725 132,947 84,042 25,950 65,259 80,364 Books checked out 329,154 263,047 234,340 254,323 250,636 241,450 122,084 63,198 149,001 150,286 Cards Issued 2,035 2,418 2,179 2,248 2,276 2,251 919 886 1,610 1,827 Number of School Children Visiting 1,539 1,562 2,947 4,680 4,528 3,303 3,708 10,221 2,435 5,968 Volunteer Hours 1,340 1,917 2,169 2,248 2,314 2,138 1,173 0 524 853 Senior Center/Wellness Center Number of visits 11,500 23,871 62,820 74,141 87,294 82,477 41,934 4,725 20,065 30,007 Volunteer Hours 2,745 1,279 1,585 1,420 1,333 1,148 506 0 0 84 Recreation activities: Participants: Leisure Classesl'I 1,177 1,322 2,241 2,278 2,168 2,039 864 269 15,538 35,786 Special events 5,927 6,460 8,185 7,783 10,449 12,650 4,950 390 4,685 9,929 Adult Sports 5,878 5,487 7,192 6,695 6,136 5,932 3,644 0 492 1,379 Goff course: Golf rounds played 43,610 41,904 45,104 43,085 42,590 44,949 33,407 39,073 44,329 44,438 Average Green fee $ 66.83 $ 69.65 $ 66.87 $ 66.80 $ 71.88 $ 72.02 $ 71.23 $ 79.63 $ 92.53 $ 92.39 Planning and Development: Number of residential units approved 494 208 40 120 0 114 92 212 132 429 Commercial square footage approved 113,149 79,092 13,000.00 391,914 7,599 102,552 3,162 152,133 15,537 32,071 Notes, 1) Data on this table may vary from year to year due to restructuring, personnel, and systems changes that have taken place at the city over the past five years. Examples include animal licensing and control contracted to County of Riverside May 2015, business licenses and garage sale permits transferred to Community Development Department, tracking system for active business licenses updated, vacation rental requirements for permits changed, Codes Department began using GoEnforce tracking software, Public Works Department expanded use of GoRequest system, City Clerk's ofce completed project to archive all old documents and plans, and has now tmnsitioned archiving documents electronically, and the Senior Center became the Wellness Center in 2015. nl "All Other' category includes building codes, business license, commercial, hazardous conditions, health/safety, other, parking, vacation rentals, and zoning. For2016, data was annualized using the seven months of actual "total closed incidents" provided by GoEnforce. i'l Declines in the reported numbers for the Library, Wellness Center, and any related recreational activities are due to facility closures and restrictions as a result of the novel Coronavirus pandemic. For 2021,'School Children Visiting'the library includes virtual storytime attendance. (4)Pmviously reported only wires, has been updated to include all forms of electronic payment types. (s)Leisure Classes line includes X-park and Fritz Burns Pool activity participants starting in 2021-22. Source, City of La Quints 159 422 City of La Quinta Capital Asset Statistics by Function (Table 24) Last Ten Fiscal Years Fiscal Year 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Public Works: Streets (miles) 128 128 128 128 128 128 129 129 129 129 Bikepaths (miles)(') 22 34 34 36 36 36 79 81.1 81.1 82.6 Streetlights (2) 277 277 281 372 372 372 372 372 372 382 Traffic signals 54 54 54 54 54 54 50 50 50 50 Traffic signs 3,018 3,018 3,018 5,758 5,758 5,408 4,808 4,808 4,808 4,858 Bridges 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 Parks and Recreation: Parks (3) 13 13 13 13 13 13 14 14 17 17 Park Acreage 218 218 218 218 218 218 - - - - Undeveloped Park Acreac 40 40 40 40 40 40 - - - - City -Owned Acres (3) 238 238 235 235 City -Improved Acres (3) 114 114 111 111 Hiking Trails (miles) 17 17 17 17.4 17.4 Senior/Wellness Center 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Museum 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Library 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Public Safety: Fire Stations 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Golf Course: Municipal golf courses 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Notes: (1) Bike path miles were updated to include both Class I (off-street) and Class II (on -street, painted bike lanes) bicycle paths in 2015; the City has been adding Class II through various projects and the 2020 number has been updated accordingly. (2) In fiscal year ending 2009 street lights at intersections were included for the first time. Additionally, the decorative streetlights in Old Town were added for the first time in 2017. P)In fiscal year 2019-20, the City added one public park, the SilverRock Event Site. In 2020, the City aligned reporting with the Developmental Impact Fee Study from August 2019 which identifies parks as 'City -Owned' and 'City-Improvedby acreage in Table 3.1. In 2021-22, the City added one public park, the X-park. Additionally, the park count now includes two sports fields owned by Desert Sands Unified School District but maintained by the City. These parks were already included in the "city -improved acres" line. 160 423 Company Name Policy Number Coverage National Union Fire Insurance 01-309-02-02 Crime, Forgery, Fraud Alliant Insurance Services, Inc California Joint Powers Insurance Authority California Joint Powers Insurance Authority California Joint Powers Insurance Authority Source: City of La Quinta City of La Quinta Schedule of Insurance in Force (Table 25) June 30, 2023 Limits Term Premium $1 Million Self -Insured All Risk Property Insurance $25 Million Pool Including Auto Physical Damage, Single Limit per Occurrence Terrorism, Boiler & Machinery subject to other sublimits Earthquake Real & Personal Property Including Contingent Tax Interruption Self -Insured Comprehensive General $50 Million Pool and Automobile Liability Single Limit per Occurrence Self -Insured Workers' Compensation $10 Million Pool Per Occurrence 07/01/22 to 07/01/23 $1,800 07/01/22 - 07/01/23 $224,780 07/01/22 - 07/01/23 $399,391 07/01/22-07/01/23 $216,066 161 424 Other Information June 30, 2023 City of La Quinta, California 425 City of La Quinta, California Project Status Year Ended June 30, 2023 Project Status: Highway 111 Bridge Funding In November 2020, Caltrans advised the City that the Highway Bridge Planning (HBP) Funding Program had been oversubscribed for fiscal years 2020/21 and 2021/22 and there is no additional programming capacity for projects already in construction or ready to advertise. At the direction of the City Council, in June 2021, the City agreed to provide "at risk" advance funding using the Advance Construction Procedure outlined in Section 3.7 of the Caltrans Local Procedures Manual, and Caltrans approved the City's request. The environmental, engineering/design and right-of-way phases are complete and are fully funded. The construction phase which includes construction, construction engineering, and contingency is estimated at $20,869,098. The HBP Funding will ultimately contribute 88.53% or up to $14,936,122 toward eligible (Construction Phase) costs. This is the amount the City is required to advance. Staff and the Financial Advisory Commission (FAC) recommend using a combination of unassigned reserves and Measure G reserves for this advance funding due to their current balances. The City anticipates these funds to be reimbursed within two to five fiscal years. In fiscal year 2022/2023, the advanced funding was approved for federal reimbursement, and the City will no longer need to subsidize the funds as originally anticipated, Funds allocated from Measure G Reserves and Unassigned Reserves have been removed from the project allocation. 162 426 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO APPROVE PLACEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE ABATEMENT ASSESSMENTS ON THE FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 PROPERTY TAX ROLL RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution approving placement of public nuisance abatement assessments on the fiscal year 2024/25 Property Tax Roll. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Code Compliance must abate properties that are considered a public nuisance after the property owner fails to voluntarily clean their property. • The City may recover costs associated with the abatement. If the property owner fails to reimburse the City, a tax assessment may be placed on the property. Council must hold a public hearing and provide opportunity for public comment in support or opposition prior to assessing properties. FISCAL IMPACT The City may recover $8,803.75 in abatement expenses; funds received will be deposited into the General Fund, Account No. 101-0000-42701 Lot Abatement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS La Quinta Code Compliance Division is responsible for monitoring the condition of properties within the City. In some cases, if properties are not well maintained, they are declared a public nuisance, due to overgrown vegetation, trash, or other unsafe conditions. The property owner is notified by a notice posted at the location and by mail. The notice allows the property owner to act and bring the property up to city standards. If the owner fails to respond and the conditions at the property don't improve, the City may secure a contractor to abate the property. Once the abatement work is completed, the City may request reimbursement for the cost of the abatement. If the owner does not reimburse the City within 30 days, the property is subject to a special tax assessment. 427 Listed below are three properties that were abated by the City and the costs have not been recovered. Therefore, staff requests Council's approval to place assessments on these properties to recover the cost of abatement, plus a 25% administration fee. Riverside County will collect the assessment and reimburse the City. Name Assessor Parcel Number Cost of Abatement Administrative Fee Total BARTON LAND LA QUINTA 764-240-021 $2,500.00 $625.00 $3,125.00 STAMKO DEV CO 600-340-029 $4,243.00 $1,060.75 $5,303.75 DEBRA KASPAROFF 604-251-020 $300.00 $75.00 $375.00 AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Hearing Notice A public hearing notice was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on July 24, 2024 (Attachment 1). ALTERNATIVES Council may elect not to assess these properties or reduce the assessment amount. Prepared by: Martha Mendez, Public Safety Deputy Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. Public Notice — Desert Sun published July 24, 2024 428 RESOLUTION NO. 2024 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, PLACING A SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION ON TAX ROLLS OF CERTAIN PROPERTIES FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE WHEREAS, Chapter 11.72 of the La Quinta Municipal Code provides for the declaration and determination of certain conditions of property to be a public nuisance and further provides for the abatement of said nuisance by certain procedures including abatement by the City and collection of the cost of said abatement on tax rolls via a special assessment; and WHEREAS, in accordance with said abatement procedures, the Public Safety Deputy Director of the City of La Quinta, as agent of the City Manager, has determined that a public nuisance exists on the following described premises, and has given the notice required by law, and the owner thereof has failed to appeal said determination and has failed to abate said nuisance as required in said notice; and WHEREAS, in accordance with said abatement procedure, the Public Safety Deputy Director has, by contract, provided for the abatement of said public nuisance on said properties and has filed a report thereon with the City Council; and WHEREAS, on the 6th day of August 2024, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did hold a duly noticed public hearing on said report and a special assessment of said costs against said properties, and upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, if any, the City Council did approve said report. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that the City has abated a public nuisance on each of the following described premises, and on August 6th, 2024, held a duly noticed public hearing on special assessment of the costs of said abatement in the time and manner as required by law and further determines that there were no objections or protests to special assessment of said costs by any interested party. SECTION 2. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and orders that the report of the Public Safety Deputy Director relative to special assessment of costs is hereby approved, and the City Council hereby orders that the following costs are hereby placed as a special assessment against the following properties and the amount of said special assessments shall be collected at the time and in the manner of ordinary property taxes. 429 Resolution No. 2024 — xxx Fund Number 101-0000-42701/Nuisance Abatement Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 2 of 2 Name BARTON LAND LA QUINTA STAMKO DEV CO DEBRA KASPAROFF Assessor Cost of Administrative Total Parcel Number Abatement Fee 764-240-021 $2,500.00 600-340-029 $4,243.00 604-251-020 $300.00 $625.00 $3,125.00 $1,060.75 $5,303.75 $75.00 $375.00 SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of the Resolution to the tax collector of the County of Riverside and said tax collector is hereby requested to collect the amount of each special assessment herein at the time and in the manner of ordinary property taxes. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 6th day of August 2024, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 430 ATTACHMENT 1 LocaliQ Colorado GANNETT AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATIO Muraguri Muraguri Stephen 3043 Magnetic DR Loveland CO 80537-6519 STATE OF WISCONSIN, COUNTY OF BROWN The Fort Collins Coloradoan, a daily newspaper printed and published in the city of Fort Collins, Larimer County, State of Colorado, and personal knowledge of the facts herein state and that the notice hereto annexed was Published in said newspapers in the issue: 07/05/2024, 07/12/2024, 07/19/2024, 07/26/2024, 08/02/2024 and that the fees charged are legal. Sworn to and subscribed before on 08/02/2024 04A Legal Clerk Notary, State of W!, Count ligr"m My commission expires Publication Cost: $200.50 Tax Amount: $0.00 Payment Cost: $200.50 Order No: 10356537 Customer No: 1467685 PO #: THIS IS NOT AN INVOICE! Please do not use this form Jnr payment remittance. EKEEG,AN MORAN ary Public of Wisconsin # of Copies: PO Box 631823 Cincinnati, OH 45263-1823 Larimer County District Court Larimer County Justice Center 201 Laporte Ave Fort Collins, CO 80521 In the Matter of the Petition of: Stephen Muraguri for the Adoption of a Child Case Number: 24JA22 Division: Courtroom: Order for Publication and Mailing The Court, having considered the Moton and Affidavit of the Peti- tioner(s), is satisfied that the Peti- tioners) has/have used due dili- gence to obtain personal service on the Respondent(s) at any address available; and that such efforts have failed or efforts to obtain same would have been to no avail, that the Respondent(s) cannot be found for personal service, and that the address of the Respondent(s) remain(s) unknown. Therefore, the Motion is granted. Date: June 26, 2024 /s/ Sarah B. Cure Judge 10356537 Coloradoan July 5, 12, 19, 26, Aug 2, 2024 F Page 1 of 1 431 432 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: August 6, 2024 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTIONS TO 1) CERTIFY AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EA2017-0008, SCH# 2018011023) AND 2) APPROVE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 (TTM 37387); INTRODUCE ORDINANCES TO APPROVE 1) ZONE CHANGE 2017-0002, AND 2) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0001; PROJECT: TRAVERTINE — CONSISTING OF 1,200 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 45,000 SQUARE FOOT HOTEL WITH 100 VILLAS, SPA AND WELLNESS CENTER AND OTHER COMMERCIAL AND RECREATIONAL USES; CEQA: AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EA2017-0008, SCH# 2018011023) HAS BEEN PREPARED FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT; LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, WEST OF MADISON STREET, AND NORTH OF AVENUE 64 RECOMMENDATION A. Adopt a resolution making Findings and approving a Statement of Overriding Considerations certifying an Environmental Impact Report (EA2017-0008, SCH# 2018011023) for the Travertine Project. B. Adopt a resolution approving General Plan Amendment 2017-0002, Specific Plan 2017-0004, and Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008. C.1 Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading approving Zone Change 2017-0002. C.2 Move to introduce at first reading Ordinance No. approving Zone Change 2017- 0002. D.1 Move to take up Ordinance No. by title and number only and waive further reading approving Development Agreement 2021-0001. D.2 Move to introduce at first reading Ordinance No. approving Development Agreement 2021-0001. EXECUTIVE SUMMAR' • The Travertine property is located in the southeastern portion of the City, south of Avenue 60, north of Avenue 64 and west of Madison Street (Attachment 1). The Travertine Specific Plan was approved in 1995 consisting of residential and commercial uses. The applicant proposes to reduce the project intensity to include up to 1,200 dwelling units of varying residential product types; two community parks; 433 a resort/spa facility consisting of a boutique hotel with a restaurant and 100 villas, spa and wellness center, yoga and tennis courts; a resort/golf facility with a golf academy, clubhouse, and banquet restaurant; a public trail system with staging areas and natural open space. • The Planning Commission (Commission) reviewed this proposal on May 28, 2024, where the applicant requested to continue the public hearing in order to address the Commission's concerns regarding noise, traffic and aesthetics due to the proposed Avenue 62 crossing over Dike #4. • The Commission heard the proposal again on June 25, 2024, and recommended certification of the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and approval of the General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Specific Plan Amendment and Development Agreement. FISCAL IMPACT The project proposal is projected to have a low fiscal impact because the property taxes and transient occupancy taxes generated by the project are sufficient to offset associated costs of the development. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Travertine Specific Plan was approved in 1995 and consisted of 909 acres with 2,300 residential units, 10 acres of neighborhood commercial uses, a 500-room resort hotel, 36- hole golf course, tennis club, private recreation, and 378 acres of open space. The applicant proposes to modify the project from the original 1995 approval to reduce the number of residential units up to 1,200, reduce the number of hotel keys to 100, remove the neighborhood commercial designation, and increase natural open space for conservation. These changes are in response to mitigation measures of the original Specific Plan EIR for the Travertine and Green project. The proposed project includes development of a mix of uses including dwelling units of varying residential product types; two community parks; a 38.3-acre resort/spa facility with a boutique hotel with a restaurant and 100 villas, spa and wellness center, yoga and tennis courts; a 46.2-acre resort/golf facility with a golf academy, clubhouse, and banquet restaurant; a public trail system with staging areas and approximately 301 acres of natural open space (Attachment 2). ntitlements Requested The project includes the following components: 1. General Plan Amendment (GPA) to reflect changes in the land uses and revise the General Plan Roadway Classifications to remove Madison Street as a General Plan roadway and realign the Jefferson Street and Avenue 62 roadways within and north of the project site. 434 2. Zone Change (ZC) to reflect changes in land uses on the Zoning Map and assure consistency with the General Plan. I Specific Plan amendment (SPA) to reflect land use changes and address design guidelines and development standards. The amendment would repeal and replace the existing 1995 Travertine Specific Plan. 4. Tentative Tract Map (TTM) which subdivides the 855 acres into large lots consistent with Planning Areas and defines main roadways and infrastructure corridors. 5. Development Agreement (DA) to establish the responsibilities of the developer in building out the project, vest developer's rights to build the project, and allow for short-term vacation rentals (STVR) for the residential units within the project. Should these applications be approved, the applicant would be required to submit Tract Maps for any further division of the lots for single-family homes and Site Development Permits (SDP) for the golf course, residential units, and commercial uses. The applicant has not yet submitted any subsequent permits. The Specific Plan (SP) document contains the design concept for the proposed project. The following discussion addresses each of the applications individually. .3eneral Plan Amendment and Zone Change General Plan Land Use Changes The GPA is proposed to modify the layout of the existing land use designations on the site to allow for a different layout and size for these uses (Exhibits A and B to the project Resolution). As shown in Table 1, the changes in layout also result in changes to the acreage in each designation. f�R 3:5 bp.y.m •:.,..ems ,so sw Po,ned RiaOns ib.] w... i..... Existing General Plan Designations 'aan Gesl Mn A., LWn I , VIm ^+:ryRes,eeMl! 3!]1 711{ 31de r� r: 1M�A ResIdeYYI MA 7M 50A 4t �+eMei W9 1u.1 o'e+3w[�ReenaAw 3653 558 yo,CatltiWNFtGeW 4A meal [amcmd &I �etwgw aGe Sea •As1 239e ASSa by Rw,1.. :, Proposed General Plan Designations 435 Table 1: General Plan Land Use Comparison Existing General Plan Proposed General Plan General Plan Designation Acres Acres Low Density Residential 382.2 318.0 Medium / High Residential 84.4 60.8 Tourist Commercial 30.9 84.5 Open Space - Recreation 365.3 55.9 Open Space — Natural 12.2 301.2 Major Community Facilities 4.1 -- General Commercial 10.0 -- Master Planned Roadways 1 20.1 35.0 Total 1 909.2 855.4 Roadway Classification Changes The GPA also involves revisions to the General Plan Circulation Map to remove Madison Street and realign Jefferson Street and Avenue 62 roadways within and north of the project site. Madison Street would function as the project's Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) and an access point for the Coachella Valley Water District recharge ponds. Existing e � r Primpry ArMriRl Secondary Arterial r........ Modified Secondary •• ••• CotleetarArterial Proposed Zone Change The Zone Change is proposed to modify the layout of the existing zoning designations on the City Zoning Map to be consistent with the proposed SP and GP designations (Exhibit A of ZC Ordinance). 436 � dwtr�vd�l f� 6..1 can 3: r9 Mud.lu n - i Rrad=_ R .d HkoR he¢Fborhmd{mmerm�' iayh[Lon'nsv[Eal Rd.S 6df Larir — open sp oe •..•n• Meier Named Raedwe e l w Ej 1'•w�l RAioiNiii f d�R or .. ©R[mveTurolcir YMan' h'31w'Jr�h". �..i ... F� F.. y'xa+•Po•5..� [u .� ':P'++� �-�nAiihsh lY CUYr Existing Zoning Designations Proposed Zoning Designations Soecific Plan Amendment The currently approved SP allows the development of 2,300 residential units, two golf courses, a tennis club, and a 500-room resort/hotel with amenities. The SPA proposes to reorganize the current land uses, reduce the intensity of the project, and incorporate design guidelines and standards. The SPA would repeal and replace the currently approved SP to incorporate the updated project. The draft of the proposed SP is provided in Exhibit D of the project Resolution. The table below summarizes the approved SP vs the proposed SP. Table 2: Approved vs Proposed Specific Plan Summary Approved Specific Plan (1995) Proposed Specific Plan Acreage 909 855 Dwelling Units 2,300 1,200 10 acres of commercial uses Resort 500 room resort/hotel with 100 Room Resort and Wellness Spa amenities Golf Training and Practice Facility Golf facilities 36-Hole Golf Course with associated Recreational and Commercial Elements Tennis Club Tennis Club Tennis Club removed Private Private Recreation in Individual Private Recreation in Individual Recreation Developments Developments Other Open 365.3 acres of Recreational Open 55.9 acres of Recreational Open Space Space including two Golf Courses; Space; 301.2 acres of Natural Open 12.2 acres of Natural Open Space Space 437 The SP proposes 21 Planning Areas to accommodate the different project features and uses, including low and medium -density residential (378.8 acres), resort (84.5 acres), and open space (357.1 acres). Roadways make up 35 acres. Residential product types are anticipated to range from estate homes to single-family larger or mid -level homes to patio homes and single-family attached units. A resort and wellness spa with 100 villas is proposed at the northwest portion of the project property, and a golf training facility with a banquet facility, clubhouse, and resort -related amenities on the east side of the project property. Open space areas include parks and trails as well as natural open space with restricted public access to protect and preserve biological, geological, and cultural resources. The SP also proposes to allow for STVRs for the residential units within the project. 'entative Tract Map The 855-acre project property will be subdivided into 38 lots for future residential and commercial development and 73 lots for common area, open space, and utilities (Exhibit E of project Resolution). Subsequent TTM's will be required to subdivide the future residential neighborhoods and commercial areas. The TTM conforms to the GPA, ZC and SPA, and is consistent with the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). Development Agreement A Development Agreement (DA) is proposed for the project (Exhibit A of the DA Ordinance). The current draft of the DA, as proposed by the applicant, includes the following terms: 1. Proposes a 50-year term (applicant initially requested 30-year term, but now requests a 50-year term, similar to other development agreements with the City). 2. Vests the project approvals (the GPA, SPA, ZC and TTM) and requires that the applicant develop the project pursuant to those approvals for the duration of the Agreement's term. 3. Allows STVR permits for the residential units within the project as authorized and allowable per the City's STVR Regulations (LQMC, § 3.25.055(A)(3)). 4. Requires compliance with project design features and mitigation measures in the EIR and the conditions of approval in the project approvals. 5. Identifies several public facilities and improvements tied to the development of the project, including the construction of part of the Jefferson Street/Avenue 62 circulation improvements. 6. Provides for the establishment of a Community Facilities District(s), also known as Mello -Roos Districts or "CFDs," for the project area to fund various infrastructure needs, including but not limited to, the construction of a fire station, roadway improvements, and infrastructure upgrades. 438 7. Includes provisions relating to transfers and assignments to subsequent developers and property owners, defaults and remedies, and mortgage/private financing ability by secured real property interests. 8. Has a Schedule of Performance tied to a Phasing Plan for the Development of the Project. The DA provides for project development in phases and a mechanism to provide for public safety costs for this area of the City, where property tax revenues are limited. The fiscal study included in Attachment 3 shows tax/cost estimates of the project and the DA provides that fees and other payments related to the Project's impacts must be paid at the time of that phase's development and in the amounts established by the Council that are effective at that time. Additionally, the DA provides assurance that STVRs are allowed within the project. The DA, like the other project approvals, is subject to review at public hearings and to findings for appropriate consistency with other governing land use documents. STATE HOUSING LAW COMPLIANCE State housing laws have been revised many times over the last few years, including the enactment of the Housing Crisis Act of 2019 (Government Code section 66300 et seq. and commonly known by its enacted legislation, Senate Bill 330 ("SB330")) and amendments to Government Code section 65863 (sometimes referred to as the state's "No Net Loss Law"). Generally, SB 330 does not allow a city to "downzone" or otherwise approve a development policy, standard, or condition for a housing development project that results in a general plan designation, specific plan designation, or zoning of a parcel or parcels to a "less intensive use" below what was allowed under the land use designation or zoning ordinances in effect on January 1, 2018. Under SB 330, a housing development includes mixed -use developments consisting of residential and nonresidential uses with at least two- thirds of the square footage designated for residential use. SB 330, however, also expressly exempts from its limitations and requirements, among other criteria, the adoption or amendment of a development policy, standard, or condition (such as a general plan designation, specific plan designation, or zone change) in a manner that implements mitigation measures necessary to comply with CEQA. (Gov. Code, § 66300(e)(3)(D), formerly§ 66300(h)(1).) As explained above and in the Travertine Project Exemption Findings in Attachment 4 (Gov. Code Section 66300 Requirements), the proposed project implements mitigation measures necessary to comply with various state - agency imposed mandates to comply with CEQA. Therefore, SB 330 does not prevent the adoption of the proposed project approvals. Similarly, the No Net Loss Law does not prevent the adoption of the proposed project approvals because none of the project areas include sites to accommodate the City's low - and moderate -income housing allocation, as listed in the current (and HCD-certified) Housing Element's inventory of sites, adopted to comply with the current cycle for the 439 Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). Moreover, even with the reduction in the number of housing units with the adoption of the proposed GPA, SPA, and ZC, the City has already met the current RHNA allocation for accommodating above -market housing development. Evidence supporting this determination is in the City's current Housing Element, its inventory of sites, and its chart for RHNA allocation, all of which are public records on file with the City and incorporated into this report by this reference. A weblink to the current Housing Element may be accessed at: https://www.laguintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/47665/638507739016430000 . AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Planninq Commission Review The Planning Commission reviewed the project proposal on May 28 and June 25, 2024. At these meetings, various concerns were discussed, including noise, traffic, and aesthetics due to the proposed Avenue 62 crossing over Dike #4, west of Madison Street. Links to the meeting videos are provided below: Planning Commission Meeting - May 28, 2024 (cablecast.ty) Plannina Commission Meetina - June 25. 2024 (cablecast.ty) To address these concerns, the applicant provided supplemental information included in Attachment 5. Additionally, the applicant has included a project design feature to include a patterned masonry wall along the sides of the Avenue 62 roadway crossing instead of guardrails, which would extend up to 42 inches in height to help block the views of automobiles traveling along the roadway. Public Hearing Notice The public hearing for this Project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on July 17, 2024, mailed to properties within 1,000 feet of the Site, and emailed or mailed to all interested parties requesting notification of the project. At the time of publication, staff has received three comments on the project regarding Avenue 62 entrance into the project site, access to the mountains and reviews from other agencies (Attachment 6). Public Agency Review All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Design and Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended COAs. tribal Consultation In accordance with SB18 and AB52, Tribal Consultation was conducted with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) and Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians (TMDCI). Mitigation measures in the EIR address ACBCI's and TMDCI's concerns regarding the site. 440 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Draft EIR evaluated potential impacts to the environment that could result from the proposed project per CEQA. The Draft EIR found that most environmental impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels, with mitigation incorporated. The Draft EIR was circulated for public review from October 27 through December 11, 2023. Public comments were received from various public agencies and residents regarding air quality, noise, aesthetics, geology, land use, housing, and traffic impacts. The comments received during the public review period and the City's responses to those comments are included in the Final EIR, along with a list of the persons, organizations, and public agencies that submitted comments, an errata/revisions section identifying revisions to the Draft EIR and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, per Section 15132 of the CEQA Guidelines, which states the requirements for contents of a Final EIR. The Final EIR, included as Exhibit A of the EIR Resolution, was distributed to the commenters and was available for the public to review on July 26, 2024, eleven days prior to the Council public hearing, in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15088 (b), which requires comments and responses to be distributed at least ten days prior to certification of an EIR. The Draft EIR found most impacts can be mitigated to less than significant levels; however, impacts to air quality emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, and transportation will remain significant and unavoidable. The Council must consider whether the benefits of the Project outweigh those significant and unavoidable impacts. In order to certify the EIR, Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations must be made. These documents are included with the EIR Resolution. Prepared by: Cheri Flores, Planning Manager Approved by: Danny Castro, Design and Development Director Attachments: 1. Vicinity Map 2. Project Information 3. Fiscal Study 4. SIB 330 Exemption Findings 5. 06-13-2024 Technical Memo 6. Public Comments 441 RESOLUTION NO. 2024 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2018011023) FOR THE TRAVERTINE PROJECT CONSISTING OF 1,200 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 45,000 SQUARE FOOT HOTEL WITH 100 VILLAS, SPA AND WELLNESS CENTER AND OTHER COMMERCIAL AND RECREATIONAL USES; ADOPTING ENVIRONMENTAL FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT; AND ADOPTING A MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CASE NUMBER: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE APPLICANT: TRG LAND WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on August 6, 2024, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental Assessment 2017- 0008 and its Environmental Impact Report (EIR, SCH #2018011023), as mandated by State law for the Travertine Project ("Proposed Project") consisting of a master -planned community on approximately 855 acres located south of Avenue 60, north of Avenue 64, and west of Madison Street, more particularly described as: Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 766-110-003, 766-110-004, 766-110-007, 766-110-009; 766-120-001, 766-120-002, 766-120-003, 766-120-006, 766-120-015, 766-120-016, 766-120-018, 766-120-021, 766-120-023; 753-040-014, 753-040-016, 753-040-017; 753-050-007, 753-050-029; 753-060-003; 764-280-057, 764-280-059, 754-280-061 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on July 17, 2024, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the site, and emailed or mailed to all interested parties who have requested notification relating to the project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2024-008 recommending the City Council adopt Findings and a Statement of Overriding Consideration and certify Environmental Assessment 2017-0008 at a duly noticed Public Hearing on June 25, 2024; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21067 of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code §§ 21000 et seq.) ("CEQA"), and Section 15367 of the State CEQA 442 Resolution No. 2024 — XXX Environmental Assessment 2017-0008 Environmental Impact Report SCH #2018011023 Project: Travertine Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 2 of 5 Guidelines (Cal. Code Regs., Tit. 14, § 15000 et seq.), the City of La Quinta ("City") is the Lead Agency for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the City issued a Notice of Preparation ("NOP") of a Draft EIR for the Travertine Project on or about March 9, 2020, and it was transmitted to the State Clearinghouse, local and regional agencies, and posted at the Riverside County Clerk's office for a 30-day comment period where comments and participation were sought from the public and all interested and affected groups and agencies; and WHEREAS, on or about October 27, 2023, the City published a Notice of Availability ("NOA") which initiated a 45-day public review and comment period of the Draft EIR for public review and comment between October 27 to December 11, 2023; and WHEREAS, pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15086, the City consulted with and requested comments from all responsible and trustee agencies, other regulatory agencies, and other interested parties during the 45-day public review and comment period and received 12 comment letters; and WHEREAS, the City prepared a Final EIR, consisting of the comments received during the public review and comment period on the Draft EIR, written responses to those comments, revisions to the Draft EIR and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. For the purposes of this Resolution, the "EIR" shall refer to the Draft EIR, as revised by the Final EIR, together with the other sections of the Final EIR; and WHEREAS, the EIR found that although most environmental impacts can be reduced to less than significant levels, impacts regarding air quality emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, and transportation will remain significant and unavoidable; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts identified in the EIR that the Lead Agency finds are of no impact or constitute a less than significant impact and do not require mitigation are described in Sections VI and VI of Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts identified in the EIR as potentially significant but which the Lead Agency finds can be mitigated to a less than significant level through the incorporation of feasible Mitigation Measures identified in the EIR are described in Section V of Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the environmental impacts identified in the EIR as potentially significant but which the Lead Agency finds cannot be mitigated to a less than significant level, despite the imposition of feasible Mitigation Measures identified in the EIR are described in Section IV of Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, alternatives to the Proposed Project that might eliminate or reduce 443 Resolution No. 2024 — XXX Environmental Assessment 2017-0008 Environmental Impact Report SCH #2018011023 Project: Travertine Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 3 of 5 significant environmental impacts are described in Section VIII of Exhibit A; and WHEREAS, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program setting forth the mitigation measures to which the Lead Agency shall bind itself, is attached hereto as Exhibit B; and WHEREAS, prior to taking action, the Lead Agency has heard, been presented with, reviewed, and considered all of the information and data in the administrative record, including the EIR, and all oral and written evidence presented to it during all meetings; and WHEREAS, the EIR reflects the independent judgment of the City Council and is deemed adequate for purposes of making decisions on the merits of the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Lead Agency has not received any comments or additional information that constituted substantial new information requiring recirculation under Public Resources Code Section 21092.1 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5; and WHEREAS, all the requirements of CEQA, and the State CEQA Guidelines, have been satisfied by the City in the EIR, which is sufficiently detailed so that all of the potentially significant environmental effects have been adequately evaluated; and WHEREAS, all other legal prerequisites to the adoption of this Resolution have occurred. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findingsof the City Council. SECTION 2. That the City Council does adopt the Statement of Overriding Considerations contained in Section IX of Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herewith by this reference. SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Proposed Project attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B. Implementation of the mitigation measures and project design features contained in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby made a condition of approval of the Proposed Project. In the event of any inconsistencies between the mitigation measures set forth herein and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program shall control. 444 Resolution No. 2024 — XXX Environmental Assessment 2017-0008 Environmental Impact Report SCH #2018011023 Project: Travertine Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 4 of 5 SECTION 4. That the City Council finds that it has been presented with the EIR, which it has reviewed and considered, and further finds that the EIR is an accurate and objective statement that has been completed in full compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Guidelines and that the EIR reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City Council. The City Council declares that no evidence of new significant impacts as defined by the State CEQA Guidelines section 15088.5 has been received by the City Council after circulation of the Draft EIR which would require recirculation. Therefore, the City Council hereby certifies the EIR, based on the entirety of the record of proceedings. SECTION 5. That the documents and materials that constitute the record of proceedings on which this Resolution has been based are located at La Quinta City Hall, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. The custodian for these records is the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta or designee. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section 21081.6(a)(2). PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on August 6, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 445 Resolution No. 2024 — XXX Environmental Assessment 2017-0008 Environmental Impact Report SCH #2018011023 Project: Travertine Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 5 of 5 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 446 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX EXHIBIT A CEQA FINDINGS and STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA for the TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT PROJECT GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002 ZONE CHANGE 2017-0002 SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 (TTM37387) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0001 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2017-0008 SCH #2018011023 62681026.v4 447 FINDINGS REQUIRED UNDER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................................1 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................3 III. PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS..............................................................................................4 IV. FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS ..............4 A. Air Quality...............................................................................................................5 i. Conflict with or Obstruct Implementation of the Applicable Air QualityPlan.................................................................................................5 ii. Result in a Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in VOCs, a Regulated Pollutant For Which The Project Region is in Non- Attainment.................................................................................................... 5 iii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................... 6 iv. Finding Related to the Project's Consistency with Applicable Air QualityPlan: ................................................................................................ 7 V. Finding Related to Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in VOCs, a Regulated Pollutant for Which the Region is in Non - Attainment: .................................................................................................. 7 B. Greenhouse Gas Emissions......................................................................................9 i. Generate GHG Emissions, Either Directly or Indirectly, That May Have a Significant Impact on the Environment...........................................9 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................... 9 iii. Finding Related to Potentially Significant and Unavoidable Increase in Greenhouse Gas Emissions: .................................................... 10 C. Transportation........................................................................................................13 i. Consistency with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b) (VMT)..................................................................................................13 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 14 i 448 iii. Finding Related to Potentially Significant and Unavoidable VMT Impacts: ...................................................................................................... 14 V. FINDINGS REGARDING POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS WHICH ARE AVOIDED OR MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVEL ..........15 A. AESTHETICS........................................................................................................15 i. Impact the Existing Visual Character or Quality of Views in Non - UrbanizedAreas.........................................................................................15 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 15 iii. Finding Related to the Existing Visual Character or Quality of Public Views From Offsite Substation: ..................................................... 16 iv. Creation of New Sources of Substantial Light and Glare Which Would Adversely Affect Day or Nighttime Views....................................17 V. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 17 vi. Finding Regarding Creation of New Sources of Substantial Light and Glare Which Would Adversely Affect Day or Nighttime Views: ........................................................................................................ 18 B. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES...............................................................................19 i. Substantial effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and WildlifeService.........................................................................................20 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 21 iii. Finding Related to Substantial Effect, Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications, on any Species Identified as a Candidate, Sensitive or Special Status Species in Local or Regional Plans, Policies, or Regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service...................................33 iv. Substantial Adverse Effects on Riparian Habitat or Other Sensitive Natural Community Identified in Local or Regional Plans, Policies, or Regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife......................................................................................................34 V. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 34 ii 449 vi. Finding Related to Impacts to Riparian Habitat or Other Sensitive NaturalCommunity...................................................................................35 C. CULTURAL RESOURCES..................................................................................36 i. Adverse Change in the Significance of a Historical or Archaeological Resource...........................................................................36 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 37 iii. Finding Related Adverse Changes in the Significance of a Historical or Archaeological Resource......................................................39 iv. Disturbance of any Human Remains, Including Those Interred Outside of Dedicated Cemeteries...............................................................40 V. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 40 vi. Finding Related to Disturbance of Human Remains, Including Those Interred Outside of Dedicated Cemeteries: ..................................... 42 D. GEOLOGY AND SOILS......................................................................................42 i. Directly or Indirectly Cause Potential Substantial Adverse Effects, Including the Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death Involving Strong Seismic Ground Shaking............................................................................42 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 42 iii. Finding Related Potential Substantial Adverse Effects, Including the Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death Involving Strong Seismic GroundShaking: ........................................................................................ 43 iv. Potential Substantial Adverse Effects, Including the Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death Due to Seismic -Related Ground Failure, Including Liquefaction: .............................................................................................. 43 V. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 43 vi. Finding Related to Seismic -Related Ground Failure, Including Liquefaction: .............................................................................................. 44 vii. Substantial Adverse Effects, Including the Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death Involving Seismic -Related Ground Failure, Including Landslides: ................................................................................................. 45 viii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 45 DI 450 ix. Finding Related to Substantial Adverse Effects Including the Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death Involving Seismic -Related Ground Failure, Including Landslides: ................................................................... 46 X. Result in Soil Erosion or Loss of Top Soil................................................47 xi. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 47 xii. Finding Related to Soil Erosion or Loss of Topsoil: ................................. 48 xiii. Located on an Unstable Geologic Unit Resulting in Potential for On -Site or Off -site Lateral Spreading, Subsidence, Liquefaction or Collapse......................................................................................................49 xiv. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 49 xv. Finding Regarding On -Site or Off -site Lateral Spreading, Subsidence, Liquefaction or Collapse: ...................................................... 50 xvi. Located on Expansive Soil.........................................................................50 xvii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 51 xviii. Finding Regarding Expansive Soils: .......................................................... 51 xix. Impacts to a Unique Paleontological Resource, Site or Unique GeologicFeature........................................................................................51 xx. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 52 xxi. Finding: ...................................................................................................... 52 E. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS......................................................................53 i. Conflict with an Applicable Plan, Policy or Regulation Adopted for the Purpose of Reducing the Emissions of Greenhouse Gases: ........... 53 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 54 iii. Finding Regarding the Project's Consistency with Applicable Plans, Policies or Regulations Adopted for the Purpose of Reducing the Emissions of Greenhouse Gases: ......................................... 55 F. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.................................................56 i. Create a Significant Hazard to the Public or the Environment due to Routine Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Waste, or iv 451 Hazard through Reasonably Foreseeable Upset and Accident Conditions: ................................................................................................. 56 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 56 iii. Finding Regarding the Routine Transport, Use, or Disposal of HazardousMaterials: ................................................................................. 58 iv. Located on a Hazardous Materials Site: .................................................... 60 V. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 60 vi. Finding Related to Location on a Hazardous Materials Site: .................... 61 G. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY...........................................................62 i. Result in Substantial Erosion or Siltation On- or Off -Site or Impede or Redirect Flood Flows................................................................62 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 63 iii. Finding Regarding Substantial Erosion or Siltation On- or Off -Site or Impede or Redirect Flood Flows: .......................................................... 63 iv. Result in Flood Hazard, Tsunami, or Seiche Zones, Risk of Release from Project Inundation: ............................................................... 64 V. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 64 vi. Finding Regarding Flood Hazard, Tsunami, or Seiche Zones, Risk of Release from Project Inundation...........................................................65 H. NOISE....................................................................................................................65 i. Generation of Temporary Increase in Ambient Noise Levels in the Vicinity of the Project................................................................................65 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 66 iii. Finding Regarding Generation of Temporary Increase in Ambient Noise Levels in the Vicinity of the Project: ............................................... 66 I. PUBLIC SERVICES.............................................................................................68 i. Result in Substantial Adverse Physical Impacts Associated with the Provision of New or Physically Altered Governmental Facilities, Need for New or Physically Altered Facilities, the Construction of Which Could Cause Significant Environmental v 452 Impacts, In Order to Maintain Acceptable Service Ratios, Response Times or Other Performance Objectives for Fire Protection................................................................................................... 68 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 68 iii. Finding Regarding Substantial Adverse Physical Impacts Associated With the Provision of New or Physically Altered Governmental Facilities, the Construction of Which Could Cause Significant Environmental Impacts in Order to Maintain Acceptable Response Times for Fire Protection: ....................................... 71 J. TRANSPORTATION............................................................................................72 i. Consistency with an Applicable Plan or Policy Addressing the CirculationSystem.....................................................................................72 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 73 iii. Finding Regarding Consistency with Applicable Plan or Policy Addressing Circulation System: ................................................................ 73 iv. Substantially Increase Hazards Due to Geometric Design Features or Incompatible Uses.................................................................................74 V. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 74 vi. Finding Regarding Hazards Due to Geometric Design Features or Incompatible Uses: ..................................................................................... 75 vii. Emergency Access.....................................................................................76 viii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 76 ix. Finding Regarding Emergency Access: ..................................................... 77 K. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES...................................................................77 i. Impacts to Significant Tribal Cultural Resources......................................77 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 78 iii. Finding Regarding Impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources: ........................ 82 L. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS..............................................................84 vi 453 i. Require or Result in Construction of New or Expanded Facilities for Water, Wastewater, Drainage or Utilities, the Construction of Which May Cause Significant Environmental Effects..............................84 ii. Mitigation Measures: ................................................................................. 85 iii. Finding Related to Impacts of New Drainage and Electrical Utility Infrastructure: ............................................................................................. 85 VI. FINDINGS REGARDING IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT..................................................................................................................87 A. AESTHETICS........................................................................................................87 i. Effects on a Scenic Vista...........................................................................87 ii. Finding Regarding Scenic Vistas: .............................................................. 87 iii. Scenic Resources within a State Scenic Highway.....................................87 iv. Finding Regarding Scenic Resources within a State Scenic Highway: .................................................................................................... 88 B. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES AND FORESTRY RESOURCES.................88 i. Convert Prime, Unique, or Statewide Importance Farmland to Non -Agricultural Use or Involve other Changes that could Result in Conversion of Farmland to Non -Agricultural Use................................88 ii. Conflict with Existing Zoning for Agricultural Use or Williamson ActContract...............................................................................................88 iii. Conflict with Zoning for Forest Land, Timberland, or Timberland Production or Result in Loss of Forest Land or Conversion of Forest Land to Non -Forest Use..................................................................88 iv. Findings Regarding Conversion of Agricultural Lands to Non - Agricultural Uses, Conflicts with Existing Zoning for Agricultural Use or Williamson Act Contract, or Conflicts with Existing Zoning for Forest Land, Timberland, Timberland Production, or Convert a Forest Use to Non -Forest Uses: ................................................................. 89 C. AIR QUALITY......................................................................................................90 i. Expose Sensitive Receptors to Substantial Pollutant Concentrations...........................................................................................90 ii. Result in Other Emissions (i.e., objectionable odors)................................90 vii 454 iii. Findings Regarding Localized Air Quality Impacts and Odors: ............... 90 D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES...............................................................................92 i. Substantial Adverse Effect on Federally Protected Wetlands...................92 ii. Interfere Substantially with the Movement of Any Native Resident or Migratory Fish or Wildlife Species or Wildlife Corridors....................92 iii. Conflict with Local Policies or Ordinances Protecting Biological Resources...................................................................................................92 iv. Conflict with the Provisions of an Adopted Habitat Conservation Plan............................................................................................................92 V. Findings Regarding: ................................................................................... 93 E. ENERGY...............................................................................................................94 i. Consumption of Energy Resources............................................................94 ii. Consistency with a State or Local Plan for Renewable Energy or EnergyEfficiency......................................................................................94 iii. Findings Regarding Energy Resources Impacts and Consistency with State or Local Plans for Renewable Energy or Energy Efficiency: .................................................................................................. 94 F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS......................................................................................96 i. Direct or Indirect Effects Involving Soil Rupture: .................................... 96 ii. Soils Incompatible to Support Septic Tanks or Alternative Waste WaterDisposal: .......................................................................................... 96 iii. Findings Regarding Soil Rupture and Soils Impacts of Septic Tanks and Waste Water Disposal: ............................................................. 97 G. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.................................................97 i. Emit Hazardous Emissions or Materials within One -Quarter Mile ofa School.................................................................................................97 ii. Located within an Airport Land Use Plan.................................................97 iii. Effect on an Emergency Response Plan....................................................97 iv. Risk of Wildfires........................................................................................98 viii 455 V. Finding Regarding Hazardous Emissions Near Schools, Airports, Effects on Emergency Response Plans, and Risk of Wildfire: .................. 98 H. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY...........................................................99 i. Compliance with Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements.............................................................................................99 ii. Effect on Groundwater Supplies or Interference with Groundwater Recharge....................................................................................................99 iii. Result in On- or Off -site Flooding...........................................................100 iv. Create Runoff Which Would Exceed the Capacity of Existing or Planned Stormwater Drainage Systems...................................................100 V. Consistency with Water Quality Control Plan or Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan..............................................................101 vi. Findings Regarding Compliance with Water Quality Standards, Effect on Groundwater Supplies and Recharge, Flooding, Runoff, and Consistency with Water Quality Control Plan and Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan: ............................................................. 101 I. LAND USE..........................................................................................................103 i. Division of an Established Community...................................................103 ii. Consistency with Any Land Use Plan, Policy or Regulation..................103 iii. Findings Regarding Division of an Established Community and Land Use Plan, Policy and Regulation Consistency: ............................... 104 J. NOISE..................................................................................................................106 i. Generation of Ground Borne Vibration...................................................106 ii. Finding Regarding Ground Borne Vibration: .......................................... 106 K. POPULATION AND HOUSING........................................................................106 i. Induce Direct or Indirect Unplanned Growth..........................................106 ii. Displace People or Housing Resulting in the Need for New Housing....................................................................................................106 iii. Findings Regarding Induced Growth and Displacement of People orHousing: ............................................................................................... 107 ix 456 L. PUBLIC SERVICES...........................................................................................108 i. Impact Police Services, Schools, Parks, and Other Facilities..................108 ii. Finding Regarding Impact to Police Services, School, Parks and OtherFacilities: ........................................................................................ 108 M. RECREATION ....................................................................................................109 i. Result in Deterioration of Parks or Require Construction or Expansion of Recreational Facilities.......................................................109 ii. Finding Regarding Deterioration of Parks and Recreational Facilities: .................................................................................................. 110 N. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS . ........................................................... III i. Require or Result in Construction of New or Expanded Facilities for Water, Wastewater, Drainage or Utilities, the Construction of Which May Cause Significant Environmental Effects ............................ III ii. Sufficiency of Water Supplies.................................................................112 iii. Wastewater Treatment System Capacity.................................................112 iv. Generate Excess Solid Waste...................................................................113 V. Comply with Statutes and Regulations Related to Solid Waste..............113 vi. Findings Regarding New and Expanded Utilities, Water Supplies, Wastewater Treatment System Capacity, and Solid Waste: .................... 113 O. WILDFIRE..........................................................................................................117 i. Substantially Impair an Adopted Emergency Response Plan or EvacuationPlan.......................................................................................117 ii. Exacerbate Wildfire Risks and Pollutant Concentrations ........................117 iii. Require Installation or Maintenance of Infrastructure that will Exacerbate Fire Risk................................................................................118 iv. Expose People or Structures to Significant Risks including Downslope, Downstream Flooding or Landslides, as a Result of Runoff, Post -Fire Slope Instability, or Drainage Changes ......................118 x 457 V. Findings Regarding Impairment of Emergency Response Plan, Wildfire Risk, Fire Risk, and Downslope and Downstream Flooding or Landslides: ........................................................................... 118 VIL FINDINGS REGARDING IMPACTS DETERMINED TO HAVE NO IMPACT ........ 120 A. MINERAL RESOURCES...................................................................................120 i. Effects on the loss of availability of a known mineral resource or locally important mineral resource..........................................................120 ii. Finding Regarding Mineral Resources: ................................................... 120 VIII. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN THE EIR...................121 IX. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS..............................................124 X. FINDINGS REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF FINAL EIR.....................................129 xi 458 Final EIR SCH No. 2018011023 EA2017-0008 GPA 2017-0002, ZC 2017-0002, SP 2017-0004, TTM 2017-0008, DA 2021-0001 I. INTRODUCTION. The City of La Quinta ("City") prepared an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for the proposed Travertine Specific Plan Amendment Project ("Project") in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA; Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations Section 15000 et seq.). The City is the CEQA Lead Agency for the Project. The EIR identifies potentially significant environmental effects to Aesthetics, Air Quality, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Greenhouse Gas Emissions, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, Public Services, Transportation, Tribal Cultural Resources, and Utilities. Where an EIR has been certified which identifies significant effects on the environment that would occur if the project is approved or carried out, Public Resources Code Section 21081 and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 require the CEQA Lead Agency to make one or more of the following written findings with respect to each significant effect: (1) Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate, avoid or substantially lessen the significant effects on the environment. (2) Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public agency and have been or can and should be, adopted by that other agency. (3) Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the EIR. Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(a)(3) and State CEQA Guidelines Section 15091(a)(3), and for the reasons detailed in Section IV below, the City finds that the Project will result in potentially significant and unavoidable impacts to Air Quality (conflict with applicable air quality plan due to significant operational emissions of Volatile Organic Compounds (in later phases of Project development, and potentially significant VOC emissions), Greenhouse Gases (increases in emissions of greenhouse gases in 2031 and 20145 that are associated with the Project), and Transportation (less than a 15 percent reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) per resident on a Citywide basis, with a per resident VMT of 12.59, as compared to the Citywide per resident VMT of 12.98) even after all feasible mitigation measures recommended in the Draft/Final EIR are implemented. As detailed in Section V below, the City further finds that for each of the potentially significant effects identified in the EIR, other than the two Air Quality, one Greenhouse Gas emissions, and one Transportation impact identified above, changes or alterations have been required in, or 1 459 incorporated into, the Project which will avoid or substantially lessen each of the significant environmental effects and that such effects will therefore not result in significant effects on the environment. While not required by CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City further finds that the Project will not result in significant impacts with respect to the Aesthetics, Agricultural Resources and Forest Resources, Air Quality, Biological, Energy, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Land Use, Noise, Population and Housing, Population and Housing, Public Services, Recreation, Utilities and Service Systems, Wildfire effects detailed in Section VI below. As detailed in Section VII below, the City further finds that the environmentally superior alternatives identified in the EIR (Alternative 1/ No Project Alternative and Alternative 3/Phase 1 Only) are infeasible because neither environmentally superior alternative would meet the majority of the Project objectives to the same degree as the proposed Project, and is otherwise infeasible and undesirable for the reasons stated herein. Specifically, the City finds that Alternative 3/Phase 1 Only, is infeasible because it does not meet to the same degree as the proposed Project the City's objective of facilitating attainment of the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation targets for new residential construction, or of developing a project that will generate to the same degree a sustainable diversified increase to the City's tax revenue stream. For purposes of the Findings set forth herein, the record of proceedings consists of the following: • The City's General Plan, as amended, and all environmental documents relating thereto; • The Draft EIR for the Project, including all Appendices thereto and all supporting materials referenced or relied upon therein; • The Final EIR for the Project, including all comments on the Draft EIR, all responses thereto, and all supporting materials referenced therein; • The draft Travertine Specific Plan Amendment and all other application materials relating to the Project, as amended; • All memoranda, notes, communications, studies, analyses, and reports relating to the Project, including all supporting materials referenced therein, that are proper part of the CEQA administrative record under Public Resources Code section 21167.6; • These Findings made by the City and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("MMRP") adopted by the City for the Project; • All final City Staff reports relating to the Draft EIR, the Final EIR and/or the Project; • All other testimony, reports, documents, studies, memoranda, maps, or other documents relating to the Project, the Draft EIR or the Final EIR that are proper part of the CEQA administrative record under Public Resources Code section 21167.6 and that 2 460 were prepared by the City, consultants to the City, or responsible or trustee agencies, or submitted to the City prior to the close of the City Council hearing on the Project; • All matters of common knowledge to the City, including but not limited to the City's policies, guidelines and regulations. The official custodian of the documents and other materials that constitute the record of proceedings is: City of La Quinta Planning Division 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone: 760-777-7000 Hours: Monday — Thursday 7:30 a.m. to 5:30 p.m. and Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Copies of all these documents, which constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City's decision is based, are, and at all relevant times have been, available upon request at the offices of the City, the custodian for such documents. IL PROJECT DESCRIPTION. The proposed Project includes development of a mix of uses including up to 1,200 dwelling units of varying residential product types and two community parks (east and west) on 378.8 acres; a 38.3-acre resort/spa facility with a 45,000-square-foot boutique hotel with a 175-seat restaurant, 97,500 square feet of resort villas, and 8,700 square feet of spa and wellness center, as well as yoga and tennis courts; a 46.2-acre resort/golf facility with a 5,500-square-foot golf academy, a 1,000-square-foot clubhouse, and 10,000-square-foot banquet restaurant (500-seat capacity). The Project also proposes recreational open space consisting of a 5-mile public trail system, staging areas, gathering areas, and passive and active spaces on approximately 55.9 acres. Natural open space land uses are proposed to occur on approximately 301.2 acres on the southern portion of the Project property. The Project also includes supporting drainage, water and wastewater and dry utility infrastructure on the Project property as well as outside the Project property that is described in greater detail in Section 3.8 of Chapter 3.0, Project Description, of the Draft EIR (Infrastructure Plan). The Project property and immediately adjacent off -site improvements associated with the Specific Plan Amendment comprise 969 acres. Access to the Project includes a southerly extension of Jefferson Street from a future development contemplated in the General Plan and Tentative Tract 33444 located west of Jefferson Street and south of Avenue 60, as well as the westerly extension of Avenue 62. These roadways will extend into the Project property and create a spine roadway that will provide access to the neighborhood communities. Entries into the neighborhoods will be enhanced with roundabouts and gated access areas. The off -site utility field included in the EIR Project description comprises reasonably foreseeable utility infrastructure, but also has independent utility because it is needed to support planned 461 growth in the City, including the Project. The precise location of this infrastructure is not yet known, accordingly these facilities are analyzed at a programmatic level and include a 2.5-acre Imperial Irrigation District (IID) substation and up to five future Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) well sites. A detailed Project description is provided at pages 3-1 through 3-65 of the Draft EIR, which description is incorporated in full by reference herein. III. PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS. The applicant is requesting approval of the following entitlements, which if approved, would allow for and govern the development of the Project site: • Specific Plan Amendment- Travertine Specific Plan Amendment (SP SP2017-0004) to amend the 1995 Travertine and Green Specific Plan to be consistent with the Project as described above. • General Plan Amendment- A General Plan Amendment (GPA 2017-0002) will (1) revise the Circulation Element Roadway Classification Map to remove Madison Street as a General Plan Roadway from south of Avenue 60 to Avenue 62, realign Jefferson Street within the boundaries of the Specific Plan; and (2) amend the Land Use Map to reflect the new land use designations proposed in the Specific Plan Amendment. • Zone Change- The proposed Zone Change (ZC 2017-0002) will revise the existing zoning map to be consistent with General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment described above. • Tentative Tract Map- The Tentative Tract Map (TTM 2017-0008) subdivides the property into smaller parcels for financing and development phasing but does not include the creation of individual lots for development of housing, proposed trails or the location of proposed gates. Future TTMs may be filed with each phase of development as necessary to implement the Project. • Development Agreement- The Development Agreement (DA 2021-0001) would set forth the respective enforceable obligations of the applicant and the City, including the special terms beneficial and mutually agreeable to both the City and the property owner to facilitate Project development, and will vest the Project approvals. IV. FINDINGS REGARDING SIGNIFICANT AND UNAVOIDABLE IMPACTS This section identifies the significant unavoidable impacts that require a Statement of Overriding Considerations to be issued by the City upon approval of the Project. Based on the analysis contained in the Final EIR, the following impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and transportation have been determined to be significant and unavoidable, after all feasible mitigation measures have been considered and adopted. These unavoidable impacts are overridden by the project benefits set forth in the Statement of Overriding Considerations in Section VIII, below. 4 462 Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(3) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City of La Quinta finds that, for each of the following significant effects, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which mitigate or avoid these significant effects on the environment to the maximum extent feasible. Nevertheless, the City of La Quinta further finds that for each of the significant effects, specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives identified in the Draft/Final EIR. However, the City finds that with respect to the significant and unavoidable impacts described below, specific overriding economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits of the Project outweigh the significant effects on the environment, as more fully described in Section VIII below, which is hereby incorporated by this reference. These findings are explained below and are supported by substantial evidence in the record of proceedings. A. AIR QUALITY. i. Conflict with or Obstruct Implementation of the Applicable Air Quality Plan: A significant air quality impact could occur if the Project is not consistent with the applicable Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) or would obstruct the implementation of the policies or hinder reaching the goals of that plan. The criteria for determining consistency with the AQMP are defined in Chapter 12, Section 12.2 and Section 12.3 of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Handbook (1993 CEQA Handbook). Consistency criteria 1 provides that a project is consistent with the AQMP if it will not result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations or delay the timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emissions reductions specified in the AQMP. A project will result in a violation of California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) if it exceeds localized CEQA significance thresholds for such pollutants. As discussed in Draft EIR Section 4.3, Project operations have the potential to exceed the applicable CEQA significance threshold for VOCs (Volatile Organic Compounds) starting in Phase 2 through Phase 3 of the Project. Accordingly, the Project conflicts with the AQMP. ii. Result in a Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in VOCs, a Regulated Pollutant For Which The Project Region is in Non -Attainment: CAAQS and NAAQS violations would occur if regional or localized significance thresholds were exceeded. As discussed in Draft EIR Section 4.3, Project operations have the potential to exceed the applicable thresholds for VOCs starting in Phase 2 through Phase 3. The majority of VOC emissions are derived from consumer products and mobile sources. The control of such sources is primarily linked to CARB regulations. Specifically, VOC emissions from mobile sources are attributed primarily to CARB's vehicle emissions standards, while consumer product VOC sources are regulated under CARB's Consumer Products Regulatory Program. CARB is continually reviewing and implementing strategies to lower vehicle emissions and reactivity of household products, such as cleaning supplies and aerosols. 5 463 iii. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential conflicts with applicable air quality plans, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: AQ-2 The Project applicant must comply with South Coast AQMD Rule 445 (Wood -Burning Devices), as amended, by explicitly prohibiting the use of wood burning stoves and fireplaces in the proposed new development. Mitigation Measures to Reduce VOCs from Mobile Sources: AQ-3 The Project operator shall provide and/or accommodate facilities within the Project property, such as bicycle parking and storage, to encourage bicycle use instead of driving as a method to reduce or otherwise eliminate certain vehicle trips within the Project area. AQ-4 The Project operator of the on -site resort facilities shall implement procedures to accommodate remote work or telecommuting, as applicable to the work sectors, as a method to reduce commercial vehicle miles traveled. AQ-5 The Project operator shall encourage the use of low emission vehicles to reduce the reliance on gasoline or diesel fuel by providing charging stations and designated parking for emissions free vehicles. Mitigation Measures to Reduce VOCs from Consumer Products: AQ-6 The Project operator shall utilize "Super -Compliant" or otherwise non - aerosol dispersal/application methods (and/or low VOC products) in all Commercial Buildings including the Hotel, Spa and Golf Training Facility. This includes but is not limited to: air fresheners, cooking spray, floor maintenance products, furniture maintenance products, degreaser, oven cleaners, toilet care products. Project operators can refer to the CARB Consumer Product Program web site for the most current information. AQ-7 The Project operator shall utilize low VOC products to the greatest degree possible on all landscape maintenance activities associated with the Commercial Buildings, Golf Training grounds and Common Landscape Areas. These shall be applied with non -aerosol measures where possible. Applicable products include insecticides, pesticides, pool/spa disinfectants, grill cleaners. Project operators can refer to the CARB Consumer Product Program web site for the most current information. AQ-8 The Project operator shall require all commercial products to be diluted as directed. 6 464 AQ-9 The Project operator shall use low -solvent or solvent -free paints shall be used for all commercial buildings and common area monumentation or walls (including repairs). AQ-10 The Project operator shall minimize the use of pesticides with high organic solvent contents, and/or the use of emulsions and water -based formulations. iv. Finding Related to the Project's Consistency with Applicable Air Quality Plan: The City Council finds that, for the significant effects related to the Project's consistency with applicable air quality plans described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, the Project avoids or substantially lessens such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, implementation of the mitigation measures AQ-2 through AQ-10, as described and recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the MMRP, Development Agreement, and project conditions of approval, will reduce construction and operational priority pollutants to the maximum extent feasible. The City of La Quinta further finds that despite implementation of all mitigations identified in the Draft EIR, operational emissions of VOC will remain a significant effect of the Project, and specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives, if any, identified in the Final EIR. Because the City has found that despite the implementation of all mitigations identified in the Draft EIR, effects on this criteria will remain significant, the City adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations included in Part IX hereof. V. Finding Related to Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in VOCs, a Regulated Pollutant for Which the Region is in Non -Attainment: The City Council finds that, for the significant effects related to the Project's cumulatively considerable net increase in VOCs described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, the Project avoids or substantially lessens such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR to the maximum extent feasible. Specifically, implementation of the mitigation measures AQ-2 through AQ-10, as described and recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the MMRP, Development Agreement, and project conditions of approval, will reduce construction and operational priority pollutants to the maximum extent feasible. The City of La Quinta further finds that despite implementation of all mitigations identified in the Draft EIR, operational emissions of VOC will remain a significant effect of the Project, and specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives, if any, identified in the Final EIR. 7 465 Facts in Support of Findings: VOC emissions from mobile sources are attributed primarily to CARB's vehicle emissions standards, while consumer product VOC sources are regulated under CARB's Consumer Products Regulatory Program. CARB is continually reviewing and implementing strategies to lower vehicle emissions and reactivity of household products, such as cleaning supplies and aerosols. The Project operations are not precluded from being regulated or forming part of future statewide controls over these sources. However, until such measures are in place, it is necessary to implement various air quality mitigation measures aimed at reducing VMTs and the presence of VOCs in applicable consumer products, as presented in MM AQ-3 through AQ-10. The Project also incorporates Mitigation Measure MM AQ-2, prompting the applicant to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445 by prohibiting the use of wood burning stoves and fireplaces in the proposed new development, therefore eliminating the source of VOCs that would otherwise be present in woodbuming devices. Even after implementation of the said measures and mitigation aimed at reducing VOCs, the Project may not be able to achieve a sufficient reduction to comply with the applicable SCAQMD threshold and would therefore result in or cause violations of the CAAQS and NAAQS. The 2016 AQMP and 2022 AQMP identify enforceable control strategies which demonstrate that the applicable ambient air quality standards can be achieved within the timeframes required under federal law. The 2016 AQMP incorporates scientific and technological information and planning assumptions, including the 2016-2040 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2016-2040 RTP/SCS) while 2022 AQMP relies on the more recent 2020-2045 RTP/SCS, which was adopted by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) in September of 2020. Growth projections from local general plans adopted by cities in the district are provided to the SCAG, which develops regional population growth forecasts, which are then used to develop future air quality forecasts for the AQMP. Development consistent with the growth projections in City of La Quinta General Plan is considered to be consistent with the 2016 and the 2022 AQMP. As concluded in the Population and Housing section, the Project could potentially result in a 7.6 percent population increase of the current City population, which is less than the approved specific plan and is consistent with City and regional growth projections. Additionally, the population increase associated with the Project would account for approximately 33 percent of the remaining capacity for population growth anticipated by SCAG in their 2016-2040 RTC/SCS and 2020-2045 RTP/SCS. Although the proposed Project will result in an overall reduction in Project intensity compared to the approved Travertine and Green Specific Plan, Project buildout would still exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional threshold for operational -source activity for emissions of VOCs. For the above reasons, while the Project proposes a reduced development relative to the previously approved Travertine Specific Plan, because Project operations would result in potentially significant and unavoidable VOC emissions, the Project would conflict with implementation of the AQMP. Operational -source emissions for the Project, however, will not be reduced to less than significant levels after implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-2 because emissions of VOC will exceed the SCAQMD regional thresholds (Draft EIR Table 4.3-7). It is important to note that the majority of VOC emissions are derived from consumer products, followed by mobile sources. For analytical 8 466 purposes, consumer products include cleaning supplies, aerosols, and other consumer products. Pertaining to operations, the Project incorporates Mitigation Measure MM AQ-2, prompting the applicant to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445 (Wood -Burning Devices) by prohibiting the use of wood burning stoves and fireplaces in the proposed new development. The purpose of this rule by SCAQMD is to reduce the emission of particulate matter from woodburning devices for the reduction of VOCs. Therefore, implementation of MM AQ-2 would employ the available compliance measure to help reduce the contribution to VOCs and ozone but would not result in a numeric reduction capable of off -setting the various sources of VOCs associated with the Project. As such, the Project cannot meaningfully control the use of consumer products. On this basis, it is concluded that Project operational -source VOC emissions cannot be definitively reduced below applicable SCQMD thresholds. Therefore, pertaining to Regional Operational Emissions, operational emission levels associated with Phase 1 would be below the established thresholds and would be considered less than significant, but buildout of the Project with all three phases is expected to result in potentially significant and unavoidable emissions of VOCs. B. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. i. Generate GHG Emissions, Either Directly or Indirectly, That May Have a Significant Impact on the Environment: As shown on Table 4.8-3 in the Draft EIR, the Project would result in emissions of 5.05 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent gases per service population per year (MTCO2e/SP/Yr) compared to the qualitative GHG significance thresholds relied upon in the Draft EIR. As discussed in the Draft EIR, in addition to analyzing Project consistency with the City's Climate action Plan, in order to evaluate the significance of Project GHG emissions, the City has also relied on declining quantitative significance thresholds through 2045, with a significance threshold of 2.41 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent gases per service population per year (MTCO2e/SP/Yr) in 2031 and 0.72 MTCO2e/SP/Yr in 2045. As shown on Table 4.8-3 in the Draft EIR, the Project would result in emissions of 5.05 MTCO2e/SP/Yr. The Project would thus exceed applicable quantitative significance thresholds before accounting for implementation of all feasible mitigation measures. ii. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential impacts concerning GHG emissions, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: GHG-1: Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the project applicant shall purchase a minimum of approximately 408,720 MTCO2e credits (approximately 13,624 MTCO2e per year for 30 years). The purchase of carbon credits must be made from a CARB-approved carbon registry with independent third -party verification. Examples of approved registries include the American Carbon Registry, Climate Action Reserve, and Verra. The applicant shall submit documentation of the offset purchase to the City demonstrating that it mitigates a minimum of approximately 13,624 MTCO2e per year (408,720 MTCO2e over a 30-year period), prior to any occupancy of the site. Alternatively, the Project applicant may submit a 9 467 GHG reduction plan to the City for approval that achieves an equal level of GHG reduction outlined herein. The GHG plan must include enforceable actions that reduce GHG emissions to at or below the total mitigated values presented herein. GHG-2: All residences shall incorporate roof -top solar panels, in -home batteries and EV charger stations to facilitate use of EVs, golf carts and other low -speed electric vehicles (LSEVs). GHG-3: All planned single-family homes shall be electric -ready and shall include electrical circuits for space heating, water heating, cooking/ovens, and clothes dryers, electrical panel, branch circuits, and transfer switch for battery storage. GHG-4: Dedicated circuits and panels in residential and commercial buildings shall be provided to easily convert from natural gas to electric in the future. GHG-5: All non-residential components of the development where vehicle parking is provided shall provide EV chargers. GHG-6: All household and other appliances shall be of the highest energy efficiency rating, such as Energy Star, practicable at the time of purchase. GHG-7: To limit and reduce energy use associated with water consumption, all project landscaping shall be desert and other drought tolerant vegetation, consistent with the local development standards. The use of turf shall be kept to a minimum. GHG-8: All HVAC systems shall be Very High Efficiency HVAC (SEER 16/80% AFUE or 9 HSPF) or greater efficiency. GHG-9: All domestic hot water systems shall be Very High Efficiency Water Heater (0.92 Energy Factor) with Enhanced Solar Pre -heat System (min. 0.35 Net Solar Fraction). GHG-10: All potable water fixtures shall have EPA WaterSense Certification or greater efficiency. iii. Finding Related to Potentially Significant and Unavoidable Increase in Greenhouse Gas Emissions: The City Council of the City of La Quinta finds that impacts associated with GHG emissions generated by the Project are considered significant. Specifically, the project design features, including the Project's mix of complimentary uses and enhanced connectivity that reduce vehicle miles traveled, and the increased energy and water efficiency measures, substantially reduce the project's GHG emissions. In addition, Mitigation Measure GHG-1 requires the purchase of carbon credits to partially offset the GHG emissions that will be generated by the Project. Nevertheless, the City of La Quinta further finds that while implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 10 468 through GHG-10 would offset the GHG emissions generated by the project that are in excess of the applicable threshold, by reducing GHG emissions elsewhere through the purchase of carbon credits among other measures, carbon credits have not been widely used as mitigation for GHG emissions for residential and resort projects in the Coachella Valley, and therefore, the City finds that there is some uncertainty as to whether the purchase of carbon credits adequately and fully mitigates the project's impacts relating to GHG emissions to a less than significant level. Because the feasibility of mitigation cannot be determined, the City conservatively finds that the Project's impacts related to an increase in GHG emissions is significant and unavoidable. The City has not been provided with substantial evidence that local hire provisions are capable of reducing or avoiding the Project's potentially significant GHG emissions or VMT impacts. As reflected in Table 4.8-4 of the DEIR, GHG emissions from construction would account for approximately 5.5% of the Project's total GHG emissions, including operational emissions (before mitigation). The letter from Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) dated March 8, 2021, provides calculations for GHG emissions reductions resulting from local hire provisions being applied to the Project's construction. The letter concludes that if a local hire provision with a 10- mile radius were implemented, the GHG emissions associated with Project construction would decrease by approximately 17%. However, this estimation should be qualified by the following limitations. First, the SWAPE letter and the calculations provided therein, utilized data and information related to a different project in a separate jurisdiction, the Village South Specific Plan and City of Claremont, respectively. Second, the SWAPE letter used modeling from CalEEMod 2016 while the current version available is CalEEMod 2022.1. Third, the vehicle emissions estimate in the SWAPE letter do not pertain to the Project and are not based on the correct, latest mathematic modeling. The SWAPE letter used EMFAC2014 data, a modeling software to calculate vehicle emissions; however, EMFAC2021 is the latest modeling. Finally, the SWAPE letter states it ran a model "reducing all worker trip lengths to 10 miles ...." (SWAPE Letter, page 4 [emphasis added].) Thus, the SWAPE letter assumes a local hire program would result in a project's construction force consisting of 100% local residents, each located within 10 miles of the project site. When local hire programs are used in practice, most local hire programs result in only a small percentage of a project's construction workers being local residents. Even if a local hire program resulted in 30% of the Project's employees being local residents, this would result in insignificant GHG emissions reductions. Using the 30% figure and extrapolating from the SWAPE letter's assumption that a 100% local resident workforce would reduce construction -related GHG emissions by 17% (and assuming those impacts are transferrable to the Project), this would mean a local hire program for the Project would result in a 5.1% reduction in construction -related GHG emissions (30% of 17%). This would represent a reduction of 45.55 MTCO2e of construction related GHG emissions, or approximately 1.73% of the Project's construction and operational mitigated emissions combined (2,627.07 MTCO2e of construction and operational GHG emissions). This would represent approximately 0.28% of the Project's unmitigated emissions (16,251.07 MTCO2e) and would not constitute a significant reduction in GHG emissions. Therefore, the implementation of a local -hire provision as a mitigation measure would be ineffective in reducing GHG emissions. 11 469 Furthermore, the City has not been provided with any documentation that the 30% goal discussed in the SWAPE letter is even achievable given the construction workforce demands of this Project. The City has undertaken reasonable and good faith efforts to discover and identify potentially feasible mitigation measures capable of reducing the Project's potentially significant GHG impacts to below a level of significance. Notably, the DEIR and underlying technical reports do not rely on any emissions reductions associated with GHG emissions reductions associated with the roof- top solar and EV charging measures implemented through Mitigation Measures GHG-2 and GHG- 5 to reduce the Project's GHG impacts to a less than significant level. In this manner, the DEIR conservatively considers the Project to have a significant and unavoidable impact. Notwithstanding this, the Project and future development would be subject to photovoltaic solar and EV charging requirements pursuant to Title 24 requirements. The City finds that these specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives, if any, identified in the Final EIR. Because the City has found that despite the implementation of all mitigations identified in the Draft EIR, effects on this criterion will remain significant, the City adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations included in Part IX hereof. Facts in Support of Finding: The project would result in 5.05 MTCO2e/SP/Yr compared to the threshold of 2.41 MTCO2e/SP/Yr for 2031 and thus would exceed the SCAQMD/City's screening threshold in 2031. In 2045, the total GHG emissions from the project would translate to 4.39 MTCO2e/SP/Yr., which would exceed the applicable threshold of 0.72 MTCO2e/SP/Yr. The proposed project is anticipated to result in annual CO2e emissions that exceed the most conservative threshold of 0.72 MTCO2e/SP/Yr. This threshold is based on a linear interpolation between the 2020 target of 4.8 MTCO2e/Yr and the 2045 target of 0.72 MTCO2e/Yr. As such, the Project's target for per capita GHG efficiency in 2045 is 0.72 MTCO2e/yr. Thus, project -related emissions are potentially significant. In order to reduce GHG emissions below the quantitative significance threshold of 0.72 MTCO2e/Yr, the Project will rely on all feasible on -site GHG reduction measures, as well as off -site measures in the form of carbon offsets. As shown on Table 4.8-4, after implementation of MM GHG-1, which contemplates the purchase of carbon credits, GHG emissions are reduced to 0.71 MTCO2e per SP per year, which is less than the applicable threshold of 0.72 MTCO2e per SP per year. Mitigation Measures GHG-2 through GHG-10 would contribute to the project's energy efficiency, GHG reductions, and compliance with State energy efficiency standards, but those reductions are not directly quantified toward the GHG reductions. Based on the current calculations, if the project pursued the 2045 target of 0.72 MTCO2e/yr, the project would require approximately 13,624 credits per year for 30 years to reach the efficiency level. The 13,624 credits would reduce the total annual emissions from 16,251.07 MTCO2e/yr to approximately 2,664, which, when divided by the service population of 3,700, would achieve the target of 0.71 MTCO2e/yr. The current GHG emissions calculations do not take credit for future vehicle emissions reduction standards that maybe implemented by CARB and that would translate to future GHG reductions (see Draft EIR at pp. 4.8-16 through 4.8-18). 12 470 While implementation of Mitigation Measure GHG-1 would offset the GHG emissions generated by the Project that are in excess of the applicable threshold, by reducing GHG emissions elsewhere through the purchase of carbon credits, the purchase of carbon credits has not been widely used as mitigation for GHG emissions for residential and resort projects in the Coachella Valley, and therefore, there is some uncertainty as to whether the purchase of carbon credits adequately, feasibly, and fully mitigates the project's impacts relating to GHG emissions to a less than significant level. Accordingly, the City finds that the Project's potential impacts relating to GHG emissions remain significant and unavoidable. C. TRANSPORTATION. i. Consistency with CEQA Guidelines section 15064.3, subdivision (b) (VMT): Residential VMT for the Project was calculated to be 14.93 VMT/resident, which exceeds the City's threshold of 15% below the existing Citywide home -based VMT/resident of 12.98 (meaning the significance threshold is 11.03 VMT/resident). Notably, however, Project non-residential VMT was calculated at 21.56 VMT/service population for the subregional area with the Project, which was identical to the "without project" VMT/service population of 21.56, resulting in a less than significant impact. Project VMT is reduced by the following project design features/attributes, which are enforceable by the City pursuant to the MMRP, the terms of the Development Agreement and/or Specific Plan: • Having different types of land uses near one another can decrease VMT since trips between land use types are shorter and may be accommodated by non -auto modes of transport. For example, when residential areas are in the same neighborhood as resort land uses, a resident does not need to travel outside of the neighborhood to meet his/her recreational needs. The Project will implement marketing strategies to optimize interaction between on -site resort and residential uses. Information sharing and marketing are important components to successful trip reduction strategies. Marketing strategies will include: ■ Resident member benefits that include use of the resort amenities ■ Event promotions ■ Publications • The Project's mix of resort and residential uses could provide for a potential reduction in Project residential VMT of 2%. • The Project includes sidewalk connections and would minimize barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. The Project's implementation of this measure could provide for a potential reduction in Project residential VMT of 1%. 13 471 Project design features are anticipated to collectively reduce project home -based VMT by approximately 3% under CAPCOA guidance. Project design features were considered after the modelling process and reduced home -based VMT from 14.93 VMT/resident to 12.59 home -based VMT/resident. While VMT per resident is below existing Citywide average VMT, it is still in excess of the City's VMT residential threshold of 11.03 VMT/Resident. ii. Mitigation Measures: No feasible mitigation measures have been identified to reduce Project VMT. iii. Finding Related to Potentially Significant and Unavoidable VMT Impacts: Implementation of the project design features (PDFs) as described above and recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval, will reduce VMT to the maximum extent feasible. The City of La Quinta further finds that VMT impacts will remain significant and unavoidable and specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including the provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or alternatives, if any, identified in the Final EIR. Because the City has found that despite the implementation of all mitigations identified in the Draft EIR, effects on VMT will remain significant, the City adopts the Statement of Overriding Considerations included in Part IX hereof. Facts in Support of Findings: The Urban Crossroads VMT Evaluation calculated project VMT using the most current version of the Riverside County Transportation Analysis Model (RIVTAM). Adjustments in socioeconomic data (SED) (i.e., employment) were made to a separate Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) within the RIVTAM model to reflect the project's proposed population and employment uses, consistent with industry standards. The project was anticipated to generate approximately 3,250 project residents and 48,508 Home - Based VMT for baseline (2020) conditions. This results in approximately 14.93 home -based VMT/capita for the 2020 Baseline with project conditions (Draft EIR, Table 4.16-38). In addition, the cumulative (2040) project scenario results in approximately 15.98 VMT/service population. Because the project exceeds the City's VMT/capita threshold of 11.03 (based on the City's standard requiring a 15% reduction below its average Citywide VMT/capita of 12.98), impacts would be considered potentially significant. However, the project incorporates design features and attributes promoting trip reduction which reduce residential VMT from 14.93 VMT/resident to 12.59 VMT/resident, including placement of different land use types near one another as well as elements of the project that enhance walkability and connectivity between the mix of use types such as sidewalk connections. Another PDF includes Marketing Strategies implemented by the resort to optimize interaction between on -site resort and residential uses (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.16- 39). Implementation of the project design features will not reduce potential impacts to below the City's established threshold for a significant VMT impact, and additional measures are infeasible because the Project is not located near transit, and the future extension of transit to the Project site 14 472 is uncertain. Additionally, there are no VMT mitigation banks or other locally adopted in lieu fee programs or comparable mechanisms available to the Project that could allow the Project to feasibly attain additional reductions in VMT beyond those attained through on -site Project design features. Therefore, the residential portion of the project would have a significant and unavoidable VMT impact. The VMT analysis methodology for retail uses (including hotels) focuses on the net increase in the total existing VMT for the region. The Project would consist of approximately 230 employees. Travel activity associated with total link -level VMT was extracted from the "without project" and "with non-residential project" RIVTAM model run for 2012 and 2040 conditions, then interpolated for baseline (2020) conditions. This methodology is referred to as "boundary method," (see Draft EIR, 4.16-40). Using the boundary method, the Coachella Valley Association of Government's (CVAG) area VMT "with project" employment is compared to "without project" conditions to determine whether there is a significant impact. The CVAG subregion VMT/SP without project is estimated at 21.56, with the Project employment, the CVAG subregion VMT is estimated at 21.56. Therefore, the project's effect on VMT (for non-residential uses) is not significant because it results in an identical cumulative link -level boundary under the plus project condition compared to the no project condition. V. FINDINGS REGARDING POTENTIALLY SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS WHICH ARE AVOIDED OR MITIGATED TO A LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT LEVEL Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City finds that, for each of the following significant effects identified in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which mitigate or avoid the identified potentially significant effects on the environment, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels. The potentially significant effects and mitigation measures are stated fully in the Final EIR and each of the mitigation measures have been imposed on the Project and are enforceable pursuant to the MMRP, the Development Agreement, and Project conditions of approval. These findings are explained below and are supported by substantial evidence in the record of proceedings. A. AESTHETICS. i. Impact the Existing Visual Character or Quality of Views in Non -Urbanized Areas: The proposed off -site utility field will consist of up to five well sites and an electrical substation. The utilities will be constructed in compliance with CVWD standards for well sites, and IID standards for the substation. Depending on the location of the off -site utility infrastructure, which is undetermined at the time the Draft/Final EIR was written, the development of the utilities, particularly the IID substation, may result in impacts to the visual character of the area. ii. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential impacts concerning impacts to the visual character, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: 15 473 AES-1 In order to reduce the proposed substation's impact on the existing visual character and reduce the potential degradation of scenic quality of the surrounding area, the Project applicant shall use one or more of the following or comparable techniques: perimeter barriers, landscaping appropriate for the substation facility. Additionally, glare shall be controlled through the use of non -reflective surfaces, dulling finishes to help blend the structures with the surroundings and reduce glare and color contrast, or comparable methods subject to the approval of IID. iii. Finding Related to the Existing Visual Character or Quality of Public Views From Offsite Substation: The City Council finds that, for the potentially significant effect on existing visual character described above, and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR, and the City Council further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measure AES-1, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Substation facilities include transmission poles and electric lines that are visually noticeable, especially in a rural context where development does not camouflage facilities. (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-52). The proposed substation would be located within a rural context within or near the City that is characterized by agricultural and vacant lots. Transmission and distribution lines are typically located adjacent to the public roadways. The new substation may result in a visual change to the existing visual character of the rural portion of the City and County. However, the new substation will be required to comply with setback requirements for utility infrastructure and design features, such as landscaping and materials used, reduces the impact of the utilities to less than significant levels regarding their impact to scenic vistas and the surrounding visual character. For example, the use of exposed metal which can be shiny, and block wall perimeters and decorative landscaping along the substation frontage would reduce visual impacts of the utility field. Although electrical substations consist of elements that are noticeable within a rural context, the potential impact of the substations can be reduced to less than significant levels with the close coordination with IID to ensure that impacts are avoided and minimized to the greatest degree practicable by proposing more subtle materials used, perimeter barriers, and landscaping. Typically, substation facilities include lighting arresters, conductors, insulators, instrument transformers, electrical power transformers, relays, circuit breakers, bus bars, etc. Substation facilities include large transmission poles and electric lines that are visually noticeable, especially in a rural context where development does not camouflage facilities. Transmission and distribution lines are typically located adjacent to the public roadways. The distribution lines extending from the proposed substation will be installed underground within existing rights -of -way. Transmission lines will be above ground and connect the new substation to existing facilities. Mitigation measure AES-1 identified above will be implemented and will further reduce potential impacts to 16 474 the impact of substations in rural areas, which avoid any significant effects (Draft EIR at p. 4.1- 53). iv. Creation of New Sources of Substantial Light and Glare Which Would Adversely Affect Day or Nighttime Views: On -site and off -site Project improvements would introduce additional light and glare to the area. On -site development will include the proposed homes, resort, recreational facilities, clubhouse, golf academy and 4-hole course. Building lighting will consist of downward -oriented fixtures in strategic locations. Off -site improvements will include the development of well sites and an electrical substation in a rural area of La Quinta. Utility infrastructure such as well sites and substations typically include lighting for security purposes and to deter vandalism. It provides safety for line crews who may be performing maintenance at night. The proposed substation would introduce lighting in an area that is surrounded by vacant and rural agriculture lands, as well as residential communities. Additionally, the proposed substation would also introduce new sources of glare to the area. Some components of the Project have reflective surfaces. Elements of the new substation including towers, metal fences, light-colored concrete or masonry retaining walls, light poles, and other elements that are light in color or have shiny, reflective surfaces could produce substantial glare that would adversely affect daytime views in the area. V. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential impacts concerning on -site and off -site Project -generated light or glare, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: AES-1 In order to reduce the proposed substation's impact on the existing visual character and reduce the potential degradation of scenic quality of the surrounding area, the Project applicant shall use one or more of the following or comparable techniques: perimeter barriers, landscaping appropriate for the substation facility. Additionally, glare shall be controlled through the use of non -reflective surfaces, dulling finishes to help blend the structures with the surroundings and reduce glare and color contrast, or comparable methods subject to the approval of IID. BIO-2 All lighting located within the development footprint shall conform with the requirements outlined in the Travertine Specific Plan and the MSHCP. BIO-17 Outdoor lighting will be down -shielded and directed away from the hillsides in accordance with the City of La Quinta Municipal Code section 9.100.150. BIO-30 Artificial Lighting: Night lighting shall be directed away from adjacent open space and SRSJM Conservation Area to protect wildlife from direct night lighting. Light fixtures adjacent to open space will be shielded and utilize low intensity lighting. If night lighting is required during 17 475 construction, shielding shall be incorporated to ensure ambient lighting adjacent conservation lands are not increased. Throughout construction and the lifetime operations of the Project, the City and Project proponent shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area, including the selected offsite field utilities parcel, and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City and Project proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. vi. Finding Regarding Creation of New Sources of Substantial Light and Glare Which Would Adversely Affect Day or Nighttime Views: The City Council finds that, for the potentially significant effect on on -site and off -site light and glare described above, and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effect as identified in the Draft/Final EIR, and the City Council further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measure AES-1, BIO-2, BIO-17, and BIO-30 which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the MMRP, the Development Agreement and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: As stated above, the development of the on -site and off -site improvements would result in light and glare (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-54). Building lighting will consist of downward -oriented fixtures in strategic locations and will avoid fixtures at unnecessary locations as required by the La Quinta Municipal Code and the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) Land Use Adjacency Guidelines. The City Outdoor Lighting Ordinance (Section 9.100.150) provides regulations for reducing light and glare caused by new development. In accordance with Section 9.100.150 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, all exterior lighting shall include adequate energy efficient lighting for public safety while minimizing effects of lighting. Parking lot lighting shall comply with standards stated in Section 9.100.150 and Section 9.150.080, which requires that graduated light standard heights in parking areas with lower heights in peripheral areas may be required by the Planning Commission to provide compatibility with adjoining properties and streets (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-54). The CVMSHCP Land Use Adjacency Guidelines are applicable to projects adjacent to or within a Conservation Area, in which lighting shall be shielded and directed toward the developed area. Landscape shielding or other appropriate methods shall be incorporated in Project designs to minimize the effects of lighting adjacent to or within the adjacent Conservation Area. Mitigation Measures BIO-2 and BIO-30 identified above 18 476 will be implemented and will further reduce potential impacts to light and glare, which avoid any significant effects (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-56). Off -site improvements will include the development of well sites and an electrical substation in a rural area of La Quinta or nearby unincorporated Riverside County. Utility infrastructure such as well sites and substations typically include lighting for security purposes and to deter vandalism. It provides safety for line crews who may be performing maintenance at night. Substation light fixtures at newer facilities are typically downward -oriented to mitigate light spillage onto adjacent properties and to reduce light pollution. Lighting at the substation would consist of downward - oriented fixtures in areas where nighttime operations or maintenance activities would occur. Lights for maintenance would be turned off during times when lights are not needed. The proposed substation would introduce lighting in an area that is surrounded by vacant and rural agriculture lands, as well as residential communities. Lights at substation facilities typically include fixtures that do not cause spillover onto adjacent properties, while providing security for the substation. The use of downward -oriented fixtures reduces light spillover onto adjacent properties, reducing potential lighting impacts from the facilities. Some components of the off -site improvements have reflective surfaces. Elements of the new substation including towers, metal fences, light-colored concrete or masonry retaining walls, light poles, and other elements that are light in color or have shiny, reflective surfaces could produce substantial glare that would adversely affect daytime views in the area. Thus, the proposed substation would also introduce new sources of glare to the area. Therefore, Mitigation Measure AES-I identified above will be implemented and will further reduce potential impacts to light and glare, which avoid any significant effects (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-56). B. AIR QUALITY i. Result in a Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in a Regulated Pollutant For Which The Project Region is in Non -Attainment: As discussed on page 4.3-22 of the DEIR, emissions resulting from Project construction will exceed thresholds established by the SCAQMD for emissions ofNOx during construction activity. ii. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential impacts concerning the cumulatively considerable net increase in a regulated pollutant, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: AQ-1 The General Contractor and all sub -contractors shall ensure that during Project and off -site utility construction activities, off -road diesel construction equipment rated at 50 horsepower (hp) or greater, complies with EPA/CARB Tier 4 off -road emissions standards or equivalent and shall ensure that all construction equipment is tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. 19 477 iii. Finding Related to the Cumulatively Considerable Net Increase in a Regulated Pollutant For Which The Project Region is in Non -Attainment: The City Council finds that, for the potentially significant effect related to the cumulatively considerable net increase in a regulated pollutant for which the Project region is in non -attainment, as described above, and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR, and the City Council further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measure AQ-1, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: As demonstrated in Table 4.3-6 of the DEIR, the Project's maximum daily construction emissions do not exceed the applicable SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance after implementation of the Mitigation Measure AQ-1. As a result, no additional mitigation measures are required to reduce air quality emissions from construction activities. To support the Project development, there may be paving for off -site improvements associated with roadway construction and utility installation for the Project. It is expected that the off -site construction activities would not take place at one location for the entire duration of construction. Impacts associated with these activities are not expected to exceed the emissions identified for Project -related construction activities since the off -site construction areas would have physical constraints on the amount of daily activity that could occur. The physical constraints would limit the amount of construction equipment that could be used, and any off -site and utility infrastructure construction would not use equipment totals that would exceed the equipment totals presented in the DEIR. As such, no impacts beyond what has already been identified in this report are expected to occur. C. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. i. Substantial effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: The Project will result in direct or indirect and potentially significant impacts to species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species and sensitive natural communities. Special status species with potential to occur on the Project site are identified on pages 4.4-11 — 4.4-13 of the Draft EIR. As discussed on page 4.4-33 through 4.4-38 of the Draft EIR, the Project will result in direct or indirect and potentially significant impacts to the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) (PBS), a federally endangered species and State endangered and California Fully Protected species, the Burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), a California Species of Special Concern, the LeConte's Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei), a California Species of Special Concern, the Blak-tailed gnatcatcher (Polioptila melanura), a California Species of Special Concern, the Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), a California Species of Special Concern, and the Long- 20 478 eared owl (Asia otus), osprey (Pandion haliaetus), and prairie falcon (Falco mexicanis) which are on the California Department of Fish and Wildlife "Watch List" species. In addition, the project site has the vegetation to potentially support nesting birds which are protected by California Fish and Game Code and by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA), which are addressed below. With respect to PBS, as explained at Draft EIR page 4.4-34, PBS was not observed on the site and has moderate potential to occur on the Project site. The Project has the potential to indirectly impact PBS due to a general increase in everyday human activity. Urbanized areas can attract PBS with grass and artificial water sources. Additional potential impacts to PBS include ambient levels of noise or light, predation by domestic pets, and other human disturbances, such as hiking, and invasive ornamental plantings that may encroach into native areas. Temporary indirect effects may also occur as a result of construction -related activities. With respect to special status birds identified above, as discussed on pages 4.4-35 and 4.4-38 of the Draft EIR, habitats and vegetation within and surrounding the Project site and the off -site utility field have the potential to support these species. Construction -related disturbance from the Project site will include human activity, noise, grading and heavy machinery. These activities may have an adverse impact on special status bird species, especially during the breeding season when individuals may be attempting to incubate eggs or raise young within or adjacent to the Project site. Operational impacts from the Project would have a general increase in everyday human activity such as ambient levels of noise or light, predation by domestic pets, and other human disturbances, such as hiking, and invasive ornamental plantings that may encroach into native areas. ii. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential impacts to candidate, sensitive, or special status species, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: Measures Specific to PBS BIO-1: Because USFWS has determined that fences could block wildlife movement, fences will not be used as an initial deterrent to unauthorized access; however, a fencing contingency plan will be developed to address any future indirect Project impacts. Following the formation of the HOA and before the completion of the habitat interface golf course, the Project applicant will establish a three -person committee, with representatives from USFWS, CDFW, and the HOA to monitor and assess the future need for a buffer fence. The committee will be charged with assessing whether a future fence is needed based on whether a fence is needed to prevent human access to sheep habitat or keep bighorn sheep off the project site. In addition, if USFWS finds evidence that a fence is necessary to prevent human access to prevent human access to sheep habitat or keep bighorn sheep off the project site, USFWS may require the construction of the fence at its sole discretion. To avoid complications in the installation of a future fence, the Project applicant would be required to provide wildlife fence easements at 21 479 the exterior boundary of the golf course or trail corridor, whichever is the outer most perimeter of the project, create an HOA as the legally responsible parry for fence installation, and provide or identify a dedicated source of funds to construct the fence prior to recording the first final map. Consistent with the terms of the Project Biological Opinion, upon either a three -person committee or USFWS's unilateral determination that a fence is necessary based on the criteria specified in the Biological Opinion, an 8- foot-tall wildlife fence constructed of tubular steel and painted to blend in with the desert environment shall be installed where the Project interfaces with Coral Mountain along the northern boundary and extend southward along the western and southern boundary of proposed development to preclude PBS from entering the Project and humans from entering the sheep habitat. The fence shall extend to where Avenue 62 intersects with the eastern Project boundary. BIO-2 All lighting located within the development footprint shall conform with the requirements outlined in the Travertine Specific Plan and the MSHCP. BIO-3 Where the Project is located adjacent to the SRSJM Conservation Area along its western edge, a minimum buffer of 74 feet shall be incorporated between SRSJM undeveloped native desert areas and private homeowner parcels and public gathering areas. Each private homeowner parcel along this western edge shall have fencing at the top of slope with Lexan panels to dampen noise to an appropriate level. BIO-4 All plant species identified as invasive by the CVMSHP, or that are known to be toxic to PBS, will be prohibited from inclusion in Project landscaping including areas adjacent to proposed open space. Prior to site disturbance a Project -specific list of prohibited plant species will be prepared by a qualified biologist for use in developing the Project Landscape Plan. This will include plants identified as invasive by the California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and the CVMSHCP. The City shall review the landscape palette prior to planting. BIO-5 The final design and location of natural trails will be approved by the USFWS and the City to minimize disturbance to PBS. Unauthorized trails currently in use on the Property will be closed to minimize impacts to bighorn sheep and replaced with the trail proposed as part of the Project. The nature trail will be closed to equestrian and bicycle use. Other than this trail, no additional trails would be proposed or allowed as part of the Project. To restrict human access to surrounding hills, including: (a) placement of "no trespass" signs at legally enforceable intervals along the trail and habitat/development interface, with legally enforceable language; (b) development of CC&Rs and educational materials that explain to residents and members the ecology of bighorn sheep and the rules concerning unauthorized hiking into sheep habitat. 22 480 BIO-6 Project proponent shall permanently protect 19.7 acres in Section 5 as bighorn sheep habitat. Prior to recording the first final map, Project proponent also has committed to acquire an additional approximately 100 acres of bighorn sheep habitat in Section 5 that also are strategically located to fragment larger blocks of land into smaller units with reduced development potential. All lands proposed for conservation in Section 5 will be approved by the Service and protected in perpetuity consistent with California Civil Code Section 815, et seq. For more detail, please refer to the Section 5 Addendum to the Travertine Biological Assessment. BIO-7 Project proponent shall establish a $500,000 endowment with the Center for Natural Lands Management (CNLM) to be managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to assist with the long-term management of bighorn sheep. Of this total, $100,000 will be provided upon issuance of the first grading permit, with the balance of $400,000 paid in installments of $100,000 per year over the succeeding four years. Long-term maintenance and monitoring activities shall be outlined in a long-term management plan and submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval." BIO-8 Project proponent shall provide an additional $100,000 to the CNLM endowment above to support the gathering of information on the effects of the regional trails system on bighorn sheep, including trails in and around the Project site. BIO-9 The Jefferson Street extension through Section 32 will be constructed using active and passive design features to prevent public roadside parking and foot access into bighorn sheep habitat (e.g., boulders, k-rail, berm, narrow road shoulder, bar ditch, and restrictive signage), subject to review and approval by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. BIO-10 Within the project boundary, approximately 100 yards at the west end of the newly constructed Jefferson Street Loop in the southwest comer of Section 33, where it connects with the Avenue 62 alignment, will be left as undeveloped desert. The distance in some places will be less than 100 yards but other features such as "manufactured slopes" and "property fences" will be used, as shown in Figure 4 — BO Conservation Measure #7 of the Project Biological Opinion. This design feature, in combination with enhanced native landscaping, will discourage unauthorized vehicle access into bighorn sheep habitat in Section 5 adjacent to the Travertine project boundary. BIO-11 No exotic plants known to be toxic to PBS, or invasive in desert environments, will be used in project landscaping. BIO-12 The Project shall not provide direct public access from internal streets to hillside sheep habitat. 23 481 BIO-13 The Project Nature Trail will form the southern and western perimeters of the Project. BIO-14 To deter bighorn sheep access to the project site, natural landscaping and property fences around residential areas would reduce noise, light, and visual impacts on surrounding hills. BIO-15 The best management practices shall be used to preclude the establishment of potential disease vectors at open water features (i.e., water bodies will be designed with steep, unvegetated slopes and deep enough water to prevent establishment of emergent wetland vegetation). BIO-16 CC&R's and Project Specific Plan conditions shall prohibit activities that emit noise above specified levels (not to exceed 60 dB(A) for sensitive receptors or 75 dB(A) for non-residential receptors (per City Ordinance 9.100.210 Noise Control). For example, only quiet electric golf carts will be used for service and maintenance. BIO-17 Outdoor lighting will be down -shielded and directed away from the hillsides in accordance with the City municipal code. BIO-18 To increase public awareness regarding the sensitivity of PBS in the region, educational materials will be provided to homeowners and made available to users of the public facilities within the Travertine development. This material will be prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and CDFW. In addition, the Project proponent will provide within the project an area dedicated as an interpretive center concerning the bighorn sheep. BIO-19 The two water reservoirs will be constructed of steel or concrete and buried underground to the extent possible, or screened by landscaped berms. Any tank appurtenances (e.g., valves) remaining above -ground will be painted with non -reflective paint colored to blend with the surrounding habitat and to prevent light from being reflected toward sheep habitat in the Santa Rosa Mountains. BIO-20 Dogs and other pets are not allowed within the National Monument and appropriate signage at the designated trailhead parking areas and any other access points will be installed to prohibit dogs along the Nature Trail. CC&Rs and club rules will require pets to remain on a leash while outside enclosed areas, and will prohibit pets from entering the hills at any time. The Project proponent will consult with USFWS during the drafting of Rules & Regulations concerning appropriate rules and regulations to protect bighorn sheep. The Master Declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions will incorporate rules and regulations specifically addressing bighorn sheep, which rules and regulations may be modified, amended or deleted only with the express written consent of USFWS. Violators of 24 482 CC&Rs and club rules will be subject to increasingly severe penalties. Compliance with the local "leash law" will also be enforced pursuant to City ordinance and the project's Specific Plan conditions. A variety of other measures will be implemented to restrict human access to surrounding hills, including training personnel to monitor and control human access to adjacent hills. BIO-21 The acreage of the Project Site that is located within the MSHCP Conservation Area shall be dedicated to Conservation in perpetuity. BIO-22 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent will provide a no -interest $2,000,000 loan to the CVCC or its designee upon mutually agreeable terms to acquire essential bighorn sheep habitat in the project area. This provision may be revised or substituted for in a manner of equal or greater benefit to the Plan upon mutual agreement of CVCC, the Wildlife Agencies, and the Project proponent. Workers Environmental Awareness Program BIO-23 A Qualified Biologist will prepare and present to each employee (including temporary, contractors, and subcontractors) a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) prior to the worker's initiation of work on the Project site. Workers shall also be advised by the Qualified Biologist of the special -status wildlife species in the Project site, the steps to avoid impacts to the species and the potential penalties for taking such species. At a minimum, the WEAP will include the following information: occurrence of the listed and sensitive species in the area, their general ecology, sensitivity of the species to human activities, legal protection afforded to these species, penalties for violations of federal and State laws, reporting requirements, and Project features and mitigation measures designed to reduce the impacts to these species and promote continued successful occupation of habitats within the Project area. Included in this WEAP will be color photographs of the listed species, which will be shown to the employees. Following the WEAP, the photographs will be posted in the contractor and resident engineer office, where they will remain through the duration of the Project. The contractor, resident engineer, and the Qualified Biologist will be responsible for ensuring that employees are aware of the listed species and observe reporting and mitigation and avoidance requirements. A record of all trained personnel will be kept with the construction foreman onsite. If new construction personnel are added to the project, the construction foreman will ensure that new personnel receive WEAP training before they start working. Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) and Special Status Species and Wildlife BIO-24 Prior to issuance of grading permit, a qualified biologist will be designated to monitor construction activities and advise construction personnel of the 25 483 sensitive biological resources on site that may be impacted by, and conversely, that must be avoided during site development. A biological monitor will be on site to monitor avoidance activities and to monitor all clearing and grubbing activities, as well as grading, excavation, and/or other ground -disturbing activities in jurisdictional areas to ensure that impacts do not exceed the limits of grading and to minimize the likelihood of inadvertent impacts on special -status species. The monitor will flush avian species and remove and relocate, if possible, non -avian species to a safe location outside of the immediate construction zone (generally 1,000 feet or more onto public lands, when feasible). Where appropriate, the biological monitor will mark/flag the limits of environmental sensitive areas (ESAs) to restrict project activities near the areas. These restricted areas will be monitored to protect the species during construction. The biological monitor will ensure that all biological mitigation measures, BMPs, avoidance and protection measures described in the relevant project permits, approvals, licenses, and environmental reports, and CEQA documents, are in place and are adhered to. Monitoring will cease when the sensitive habitats and jurisdictional areas have been cleared or impacted. The biological monitor will ensure that construction activities will maintain measures to prevent accidental trapping of wildlife into excavated areas and inspect excavated areas daily to detect the presence of trapped wildlife. All deep or steep -walled excavated areas should be covered with plywood or other weight bearing material and will be furnished with escape ramps at a 3:1 slope or are surrounded with exclusionary fencing in order to prevent wildlife from entering them. Trapped wildlife should be relocated out of harm's way to a suitable habitat outside of the project area. The biological monitor will have the authority to temporarily halt all construction activities and all non emergency actions if ESAs and special - status species are identified and will be directly impacted. The monitor will notify the appropriate resource agency and consult if needed. If needed, and if possible, the biological monitor will relocate the individual outside of the work area where it will not be harmed. Work can continue at the location if the project proponent and the consulted resource agency determine that the activity will not result in impacts on the species. All biological monitor observations of special -status species will be documented and mapped in monitoring logs. Monitoring logs will be completed for each day of monitoring. All special -status species recordings will be submitted to the CNDDB. The biological monitors will be responsible for documenting compliance with avoidance measures, the results of the surveys and the ongoing 26 484 monitoring, and will provide a copy of the monitoring reports for impact areas to the County EPD and any permitting agencies that require reporting. The appropriate agencies will be notified if a dead or injured protected species is located within the project site. Written notification will be made within 15 days of the date and time of the finding or incident (if known) and will include: location of the carcass, a photograph, cause of death (if known), and other pertinent information. BIO-25 Prior to issuance of grading permits and commencement of any ground - disturbing activities or vegetation removal the following measures would be implemented to avoid impacts on ESAs, surrounding habitats, and special status species and wildlife: a. Project footprint would be set at the minimum size to accomplish necessary work, and the footprint will be of a size/area no greater than is identified in the CEQA documentation, to minimize impacts on sensitive biological resources. b. Specifications for the project boundary, limits of grading, project related parking, storage areas, laydown sites, and equipment storage areas would be mapped and clearly marked in the field with temporary fencing, signs, stakes, flags, rope, cord, or other appropriate markers. All markers would be maintained until the completion of activities in that area. c. To minimize the amount of disturbance, the construction/laydown activities, parking, staging, storage, spoil management, and equipment access will be restricted to designated areas. Designated areas will comprise existing disturbed areas (parking lots, access roads, graded areas, etc.) to the extent possible. d. Designated staging areas will be enclosed with temporary security fencing. All staging areas will comply with conditions in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP), which provides BMPs to avoid or mitigate erosion impacts during construction. e. Project -related work limits would be defined and work crews would be restricted to designated work areas. Disturbance beyond the actual construction zone will be prohibited without site -specific surveys. If sensitive biological resources are detected in an area to be impacted, then appropriate measures would be implemented to avoid impacts (i.e., flag and avoid, erect orange construction fencing, biological monitor present during work, etc.). However, if avoidance is not possible and the sensitive biological resources would be directly impacted by project activities, the biologist would mark and/or stake the site(s) and map the individuals on an aerial map and with a Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. The biologist would then contact the appropriate resource agencies to develop additional 27 485 avoidance, minimization and/or mitigation measures prior to commencing project activities. f. ESAs would be identified, mapped, clearly marked in the field, and avoided to the maximum extent practicable in order to avoid and minimize impacts on sensitive biological resources. g. Existing roads and trails would be utilized wherever possible to avoid unnecessary impacts. Project related vehicle traffic would be restricted to established roads, staging areas, and parking areas. Travel outside construction zones will be prohibited. h. Monitoring would occur periodically during the length of construction activities to ensure project limits, designated areas (parking, storage, etc.), and ESAs are still clearly marked. i. Signs will be installed on boundaries of the Project Site and other strategic locations to notify the public of the sensitive biological resources identified onsite and prohibit entry into key high value habitat areas. BIO-26 Prior to construction, the construction area and adjacent habitat within 500 feet of the construction area, or to the edge of the property if less than 500 feet, will be surveyed by a Qualified Biologist for burrows that could be used by burrowing owl. Two (2) surveys will be conducted, with one survey to be conducted between 14 and 30 days prior to site disturbance, and a second survey to be conducted within 24 hours of site disturbance, following methods described in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game 2012). If a burrow is located, the Qualified Biologist will determine if an owl is present in the burrow. If the burrow is determined to be occupied, the burrow will be flagged and a 160-foot buffer during the non -breeding season and a 250- foot buffer during the breeding season, or a buffer to the edge of the property boundary if less than 500 feet, will be established around the burrow. The buffer will be staked and flagged. No construction will be permitted within the buffer until the young are no longer dependent on the burrow. If the burrow is unoccupied, the burrow will be made inaccessible to burrowing owls, and construction activities may proceed. If either a nesting or escape burrow is occupied, burrowing owls shall be relocated pursuant to accepted protocols and in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies (CDFW and USFWS). A burrow is assumed occupied if records indicate that, based on surveys conducted following protocol, at least one burrowing owl has been observed occupying a burrow on site during the past three years. If there are no records for the site, surveys must be conducted to determine, prior to construction, if burrowing owls are present. Determination of the appropriate method of relocation, such as eviction/passive relocation or active relocation, shall be based on the 28 486 specific site conditions (e.g., distance to nearest suitable habitat and presence of burrows within that habitat) in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. Active relocation and eviction/passive relocation require the preservation and maintenance of suitable burrowing owl habitat determined through coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. BIO-27 Prior to the start of construction activities during the nesting season (February I st through August 31 st) in modeled Le Conte's thrasher habitat in the SRSJM Conservation Area, surveys will be Conducted by a Qualified Biologist on the construction site and within 500 feet of the construction site, or to the property boundary if less than 500 feet. If nesting Le Conte's thrashers are found, a 500-foot buffer, or to the property boundary if less than 500 feet, will be established around the nest site. The buffer will be staked and flagged. No construction will be permitted within the buffer during the breeding season (January 15 through June 15) or until the young have fledged. BIO-28 Vegetation clearing shall be conducted outside of the nesting season, which is generally identified as February I through August 31, to the greatest extent feasible. Regardless of the time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist no more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Pre -construction surveys shall focus on both direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. BIO-29 Drainage and Toxics: Project stormwater runoff will be conveyed eastward toward the Dike 4 impound and away from Project surrounding open space, and SRSJM Conservation Area. Stormwater retention basins are designed to provide requisite water quality treatment, including bio-remediation. Subsequent engineering will include preparation of a SWPPP that will 29 487 ensure against increased runoff and protect water quality during and post - construction. BIO-30 Artificial Lighting: Night lighting shall be directed away from adjacent open space and SRSJM Conservation Area to protect wildlife from direct night lighting. Light fixtures adjacent to open space will be shielded and utilize low intensity lighting. No nighttime lighting will be utilized on the nature trail and a curfew will be established for trail use from sunrise to sunset. Notice of the trail curfew will be posted at each trail entry point. If night lighting is required during construction, shielding shall be incorporated to ensure ambient lighting adjacent conservation lands are not increased. Throughout construction and the lifetime operations of the Project, the City and Project proponent shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area, including the selected offsite field utilities parcel, and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City and Project proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. BIO-31 Noise: The Project will incorporate setbacks, as specified in the Specific Plan to minimize the effects of noise on wildlife. BIO-32 Unauthorized Access: The Project will incorporate signage, fencing, gates, and similar measures and barriers to inform the hiking public and to avoid or minimize unauthorized access to adjacent open space lands. BIO-33 California Desert Native Plants Act: The applicant will collect California Desert Native Plan Act protected plants, including California barrel cactus (Ferocactus cylindraceus), Gander's buckhorn cholla (Cylindropuntia ganderi), Englemann's hedgehog cactus (Echinocereus engelmannii), cottontop cactus (Echinocactus polycephalus), beavertail cactus (Opuntia basilaris), branched pencil cholla (Cylindropuntia ramossissima), ocotillo (Fouquieria splendens), catclaw (Acacia greggii), blue paloverde (Parkinsonia florida), and smoke tree (Psorothamnus spinosus) and prioritize reuse of plant materials onsite. A permit from the Agriculture Commissioner of the County of Riverside shall be obtained prior to collection and relocation of these species. 30 488 Off -site improvements BIO-34: A general biological field survey to document existing conditions and the suitability of habitats within the utility field parcels to support special -status wildlife species such as burrowing owl, which could potentially occur on - site. Regardless of focused survey findings, if suitable habitat for burrowing owl is present, two (2) separate preconstruction surveys are required prior to any ground disturbance, one no less than 14 days prior to disturbance, and the other within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance. Should take of burrowing owl be expected, a relocation plan and extensive coordination to move animals offsite can be expected. BIO-35: Le Conte's Thrasher. Le Conte's thrasher focused surveys shall be performed by a qualified avian biologist prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities following methods outlined on pages 6-8 of the LeConte's Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei) Status and Nest Site Requirements in the Coachella Valley (Hargrove, L. P. et al. 20204), including the broadcast of song and calls by a qualified avian biologist with an appropriate permit. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, the qualified biologist shall inform CDFW and shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. BIO-36: Burrowing Owl Avoidance: No less than 60 days prior to the start of Project -related activities, a burrowing owl habitat assessment shall be conducted within the Project site and surrounding area, including the selected off -site utility field parcel, by a qualified biologist according to the specifications of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Department of Fish and Game, March 2012 or most recent version). Suitable habitat for burrowing owl has been identified within the Project site; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Focused burrowing owl surveys shall also be conducted in all areas identified through a habitat assessment as being suitable habitat for 31 489 burrowing owls at the selected off -site utility field parcel. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project proponent shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures if avoidance is proposed. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe minimization and relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. The Project proponent shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW and USFWS review and approval. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. BIO-37: All operation and maintenance activities relating to the Project's water tank facilities will be designed and conducted in a manner consistent with the applicable mitigation measures in the 2015 Operations and Maintenance Manual for Coachella Valley Water District Covered Activities and Facilities Within Conservation Areas. Avoidance and minimization measures include, but are not limited to: (i) the number of access routes, number and size of staging areas, and the total area of any operations and maintenance activities shall be limited to the minimum necessary to achieve the project goal; (ii) routes and boundaries outside the normal access roads shall be clearly delineated through fencing or flagging; (iii) if any CVWD employee inadvertently impacts a listed species or sensitive habitat during operations and maintenance activities, CVWD shall report the activity within 24 hours to CDFW. 32 490 iii. Finding Related to Substantial Effect, Either Directly or Through Habitat Modifications, on any Species Identified as a Candidate, Sensitive or Special Status Species in Local or Regional Plans, Policies, or Regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: The City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects on candidate, sensitive, or special status species described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Draft/Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures BI0-1 through BI0-37, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the MMRP, Development Agreement, and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: PBS: Although the PBS was not observed on the Project site during the 2022 field survey performed by Michael Baker, there is a moderate potential for the PBS to occur on the Project. Urbanized areas can attract PBS with grass and artificial water sources. However, potential impacts to PBS include ambient levels of noise or light, predation by domestic pets, and other human disturbances, such as hiking, and invasive ornamental plantings that may encroach into native areas (Draft EIR at p. 4.4-34). Therefore to reduce impacts to PBS, the Project shall implement Mitigation Measures BI0-1 through BIO-22, by focusing on trail locations, habitat acquisition and long-term management, funding of research, future evaluations for the need of a wildlife fence, Project design considerations, prohibition of invasive non-native plant species in Project landscaped areas, noise reduction, the prevention of light spillage into open space and the SRSJM Conservation Areas, and provision of educational interpretive materials located along the proposed trail system. Additionally, Mitigation Measures BIO-29 through BIO-32 avoid or minimize indirect effects and/or authorized access to adjacent open space and Conservation Area. Thus, impacts to PBS is reduced to less than significant levels. Special Status Birds: Habitats and vegetation within and surrounding the Project site have the potential to support nesting black -tailed gnatcatcher, loggerhead shrike, long-eared owl, osprey, prairie falcon, and other common birds. No active bird nests or birds displaying nesting behaviors were observed within the Project site during the field surveys. However, onsite vegetation provides suitable nesting opportunities for a variety of resident and migratory bird species. Project -related construction and operational activities could disturb bird species. Therefore, Mitigation Measures BIO-23 through BIO-28 and BIO-35 and -36, listed above, are recommended to avoid habitat destruction and/or disturbance of foraging or nesting, and take of any birds, including those listed above, which are protected pursuant to the MBTA and CFGC. The Mitigation Measures require a worker environmental awareness program (WEAP) to teach construction workers of special status species; a biological monitor to monitor the site during cleaning and grubbing activities; and establishing limits to Project footprint during ground -disturbing activities or vegetation removal. 33 491 Mitigation Measures are also established to minimize impacts to burrowing owls, Le Conte's thrasher, and other nesting birds via a survey prior to disturbance (Draft EIR at p. 4.4-52 and (BIO- 35 and BI0-36). Mitigation Measure BIO-27 specifically addresses potential impacts to LeConte's thrasher because the species is covered under the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP), and was determined to have a moderate potential to occur on -site. The CVMSHCP requires take avoidance surveys for the LeConte's thrasher prior to construction at a project site to avoid direct impacts. To ensure consistency with the CVMSHCP, Mitigation Measure BIO-27 incorporates the precise language from Section 4.4 of the plan. Other bird species (i.e., black -tailed gnatcatcher, loggerhead shrike, etc.) are not covered species under the CVMSHCP and as a result, are not specifically included in Mitigation Measure BIO-27. Survey requirements for the other species present at the Project site that is covered under the CVMSHCP, the burrowing owl, are specifically addressed in Mitigation Measure BI0-26. Measure BIO-28 requires pre -construction nesting bird surveys covering all bird species and is adequate to mitigate impacts to bird species not specifically addressed in Mitigation Measures BIO-26 and BIO-27. Additionally, off -site improvements would require that biological field survey be complete prior to ground disturbance to ensure that impacts to special status species are less than significant. iv. Substantial Adverse Effects on Riparian Habitat or Other Sensitive Natural Community Identified in Local or Regional Plans, Policies, or Regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife: The Project would result in the permanent and temporary loss of sensitive natural community would be potentially significant prior to mitigation. However, impacts would be avoided and minimized through the permanent protection of avoided jurisdictional resources on the Project site and additional habitat on lands to the west and south through a formal conservation instrument (e.g., easement), and through implementation of measures provided in the USFWS BO, CVCC's Final JPR, and Mitigation Measures BI0-38, -39 and -40. V. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential impacts to the riparian habitat, the following mitigation measure are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: BIO-38 Prior to the issuance of grading or building permits for the project, and prior to initiating any work that may impact jurisdictional waters identified in the Travertine Project Biological Resources Assessment, the Project -specific Delineation of State and Federal Jurisdictional Waters, Michael Baker International, and the off -site utility field assessment prepared by Michael Baker International, dated March 2022, June 2021, and June 2022, respectively, the Project proponent shall provide notice to CDFW and obtain a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement as required pursuant to California Fish and Game Code sections 1602-1616. 34 492 BIO-39 Impacts to CDFW jurisdictional waters shall be mitigated pursuant to a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) which will be prepared to identify specific on -site and/or off -site mitigation activities that will be implemented to compensate for unavoidable impacts to CDFW jurisdictional areas. Impacts to non -riparian waters will be mitigated at a minimum 1:1 ratio. Impacts to riparian vegetation will be mitigated at a minimum 2:1 ratio. The HMMP will identify the mitigation program coordinated with and approved by CDFW, set mitigation success criteria, and guide a five-year qualitative and quantitative mitigation monitoring program to track mitigation success. Annual reports will be submitted to CDFW each year for five years, summarizing mitigation performance against the success criteria. Offsite: BIO-40: Prior to construction of the Project, including the offsite utility field, a jurisdictional delineation should be conducted to determine the presence or absence and potential regulatory status of any jurisdictional features should it be determined they may be impacted by installation of water wells and the electric power substation within a proposed impact area. If impacts to jurisdictional features are identified, the Project proponent shall comply with the regulatory requirements of the USACE, RWQCB and CDFW, as applicable, regarding required regulatory permits, including a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, Section 404 Permit, Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Project proponent shall implement the recommendations of the Project Drainage Study (DEIR, Appendix J.3) and in accordance with the recommendations of the Project Drainage Plan prior to issuance of a grading permit obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Project Proponent shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. vi. Finding Related to Impacts to Riparian Habitat or Other Sensitive Natural Community: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures BIO-38, BIO-39, and BIO-40, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the MMRP, Development Agreement, and project conditions of approval. 35 493 Facts in Support of Finding: The Parkinsonia florida — Olneya tesota Woodland (Blue Palo Verde — Ironwood Woodland) community is also identified as Desert Dry Wash Woodland habitat subject to CDFW jurisdiction. The Project will result in permanent impacts to 53.15 acres and temporary impacts to 12.15 acres of CDFW jurisdictional streambed. The Project would temporarily impact approximately 2.67 acres and permanently impact 10.73 acres of Desert Dry Wash Woodland habitat. Approximately 1.26 acres of temporary impacts and 5.82 acres of permanent impacts to Desert Dry Wash Woodland habitat occurs within the CDFW jurisdictional streambed and the remaining 1.41 acres of temporary impacts and 4.91 acres of permanent impacts to Desert Dry Wash Woodland habitat is associated with the CDFW jurisdictional streambed. The permanent and temporary loss of this sensitive natural community would be potentially significant prior to mitigation. However, the permanent protection of avoided jurisdictional resources on the Project site and additional habitat on lands to the west and south through a formal conservation instrument (e.g., easement), and implementation of measures provided in the USFWS BO, (refer to Appendix D.1), CVCC's Final JPR (refer to Appendix D.5), and Mitigation Measures BIO-38 and BIO-39 would reduce impacts to level of less than significant. Off -Site Utility Field: Based on an assessment conducted by Michael Baker, aquatic features potentially falling under State jurisdiction are present within the off -site locations. The review indicated that an agricultural pond and a potential wetland area is located within the off -site area. Based on the analysis provided by Michael Baker (2021), these features potentially fall under regulatory jurisdiction of the Regional Water Quality Control Board and/or CDFW pursuant to the Porter -Cologne Water Quality Control Act and the California Fish and Game Code CFGC, respectively. Project -level environmental review of the wells and substation will be conducted by CVWD and IID, respectively, in their roles as CEQA lead agencies, and once site -specific locations of the infrastructure is available. A jurisdictional delineation is recommended at these off -site areas, once the site locations for the wells and the substation have been determined to assess the potential regulatory status of these features the degree to which they may be impacted by installation of water wells and the electric power substation. This recommendation is reflected in Mitigation Measure BIO-40. D. CULTURAL RESOURCES i. Adverse Change in the Significance of a Historical or Archaeological Resource: Based on the results of archaeological surveys, a total of 46 resources (27 archaeological sites and 19 isolated finds) were identified within the Project area of potential effects (APE). The previously recorded resources that could potentially be adversely impacted by the proposed Project include ten NRHP or CRHR eligible historical or archaeological resources (sites P-33-001331, P-33- 003872, P-33-003873, P-33-003874, P-33-005323, P-33-014844, P-33-014845, P-33-014846, P- 33-014847; and P-33-014988) have been identified within the APE. However, they were located outside of the Project area of direct impact (ADI). SWCA determined that Site P-33-014988, which included prehistoric milling slicks, is individually eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR. The remaining nine consist of prehistoric milling slicks, ceramic scatter, bedrock milling station and a 36 494 habitation site, and are recommended eligible as contributors to the Martinez Mountain Rockslide District (MMRD). SWCA concluded that the nine newly identified resources are not eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR. The proposed Project property avoids impacts to all identified and potentially significant archaeological sites (NHPA historic properties and CRHR historic resources) located within the APE. Specifically, the Project avoids disturbances to all historic properties and historic resources in and near the APE. The area of direct impact, which includes all areas directly affected by Project construction, completely avoids all resources that are eligible either individually or as contributors to the MMRD. These resources are located within the designated open space natural areas (Planning Area 20) and will not be developed, nor will they be affected by Project construction or operation, which allows for their long-term protection and conservation. Although the Project will avoid impacts to cultural resources, due to the sensitivity of the area impacts are considered significant without mitigation. ii. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential impacts to historic resources, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: CR-1 Prior to any ground -disturbing activities, the Project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of Interior's Standards for professional archaeology, to carry out all mitigation measures related to cultural resources. Tribal monitoring of site disturbance will also be accommodated. CR-2 The Project applicant shall assign a compliance officer for the Project to ensure mitigation measures are in place and followed for the duration of Project construction. The compliance officer should prepare a monthly compliance report for distribution to the City, BOR, BLM, and interested Native American groups. The compliance officer may be the same person as the Project archaeologist or may be another qualified individual designated by the Project applicant. CR-3 Prior to the commencement of ground disturbance, a Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (Monitoring Plan) shall be prepared. The Monitoring Plan shall include, but not be limited to: principles and procedures for the identification of cultural resources monitoring protocols consistent with CR-1, CR-2 and CR-7 for ground - disturbing activities, a worker training program consistent with CR-6, and discovery and processing protocols for inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources consistent with CR-7 and CR-8. The plan shall detail protocols for determining circumstances in which additional or reduced levels of monitoring (e.g., spot checking) may be appropriate. Fencing with a buffer shall be placed around resources to be avoided. The Monitoring Plan shall 37 495 also establish a protocol for communicating with the lead agencies and interested Native American parties. CR-4 Prior to ground -disturbing activities in any areas outside the APE described in the Project EIR, Exhibit 4.5-1, including but not limited to locations proposed for the off -site utility field, a supplemental study including an updated records search at the EIC, updated Sacred Lands File search, and pedestrian survey, shall be conducted. If resources are identified and cannot be avoided, they shall be assessed for their eligibility for the NRHP and CRHR. Avoidance and minimization measures identified as a result of the study shall be incorporated into the Monitoring Plan. CR-5 In the event of unanticipated discovery of NRHP- and CRHR-eligible resources within the APE or the off -site utility field, where operationally feasible, such resources shall be protected from direct project impacts by project redesign (i.e., relocation of the ground disturbance, ancillary facilities, or temporary facilities or work areas). Avoidance mechanisms shall include temporary fencing and designation of such areas as environmentally sensitive areas (ESAs) for the duration of the proposed Project. ESAs shall include the boundary of each historic property plus a 30-meter (98-foot) buffer around the resource. CR-6 Prior to the commencement of ground -disturbing activities, typically at the Project kick-off, the qualified archaeologist or their designee will provide cultural sensitivity training to construction crews. The training will provide information on signs of potential cultural resources, regulatory requirements for the protection of cultural resources and the proper procedures to follow should unanticipated cultural resources discoveries be made during construction. Workers will be provided contact information and protocols to follow if inadvertent discoveries are made. Workers will be shown examples of the types of tribal cultural resources that might be encountered and that would require notification of the project archaeologist. The Project archaeologist shall create a training video, PowerPoint presentation, or printed literature that can be shown to new workers and contractors for continuous training throughout the life of the Project. CR-7 Prior to ground disturbance, an archaeological monitor, working under the supervision of the qualified archaeologist, and Native American monitors from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, shall be retained to monitor ground -disturbing activities. Monitoring will take place within or near ESAs or in other areas agreed upon by the archaeologist, City, and Native American monitor, and as identified in the Monitoring Plan. Monitoring activities will include examining the excavation of native soils as well as the disposal of spoils in certain areas. The duration, timing and location of the monitoring shall be determined by the City in consultation with the qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors as outlined in the Monitoring Plan. Should 38 496 buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer. Additionally, fencing with a buffer shall be required around resources to be avoided. CR-8 In the event that cultural resources are exposed during excavation, work in the immediate vicinity of the find must stop until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find. Ground -disturbing activities may continue in other areas. For discoveries located outside of BLM land, if the City determines, in consideration of the subsequent analysis by the qualified archaeologist, that the resource is a protected resource under CEQA (Section 15064.5f, PRC 21082) additional work such as testing or data recovery may be warranted prior to resumption of ground -disturbing activity in the location of discovery. For discoveries located on BLM-land, if the BLM determines, in consideration of the subsequent analysis by the qualified archaeologist, that the resource is protected under Section 106 of the NHPA, additional work such as testing or data recovery may be warranted prior to resumption of ground -disturbing activity in the location of discovery. Should any tribal cultural resources be encountered, additional consultation with California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)—listed tribal groups should be conducted in coordination with the City and/or with the BLM and BOR if the discovery occurs on federal lands. iii. Finding Related Adverse Changes in the Significance of a Historical or Archaeological Resource: Pursuant to Section 2108l(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for the significant effects on historic resources described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-8, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the MMRP, Development Agreement, and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: While implementation of the Project has the potential to impact the identified cultural resources described above and in the Draft EIR (see pp. 4.5-15 — 4.5-17), these potentially significant impacts to cultural resources will be mitigated to below a level of significance through implementation of Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-8 which requires the preparation of a monitoring and mitigation program plan to implement strategies for avoiding and minimizing impacts to cultural resources cultural sensitivity training to construction crews, and retaining a qualified archaeologist and/or a compliance officer to implement the mitigation measures and training. Mitigation Measures will also include an archaeological and/or Native American monitor during certain 39 497 ground -disturbing activities. If cultural resources are exposed during excavations or other ground disturbances, work in the immediate vicinity of the find must stop until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find. Additionally, supplemental studies for areas outside the APE, are required, and all unevaluated and NRHP- and CRHR-eligible resources shall be protected from direct Project impacts through avoidance mechanisms (i.e., fencing, designating environmentally sensitive areas). Therefore, development of the proposed Project would result in less than significant impacts to cultural resources with the implementation of mitigation measures. Although the location of the off -site utility field has not been determined, the general area where the off -site improvements are proposed is located in an area with moderate to high sensitivity for prehistoric and historic -period archaeological resources. Thus, construction of the off -site utility field may result in impacts to cultural resources. Mitigation Measures CR-4, CR-7 and CR-8 requires the completion of a records search at the EIC, an updated Sacred Lands File search, and a pedestrian survey shall be required to confirm the presence or absence of potentially sensitive cultural resources prior to the selection of sites for the CVWD well sites and the IID substation. Additionally, outreach to local tribes to determine if tribal cultural resources may be impacted is recommended. Development should be avoided in designated areas, pursuant to the recommendations of the cultural reports. If the areas identified in the cultural reports cannot be avoided, additional archaeological testing of any known sites to determine boundaries and eligibility for listing in the CRHR and NRHP should be conducted prior to any development activities and monitoring of all ground -disturbing activities is recommended (Draft EIR at p. 4.5- 17). Impacts of the off -site utility field will be less than significant with incorporation of the above listed mitigation measures. iv. Disturbance of any Human Remains, Including Those Interred Outside of Dedicated Cemeteries: The project occurs in a highly sensitive area, and ground disturbing activities could result in the identification of additional resources, including previously unidentified cremations and human remains, and this is considered a potentially significant adverse effect. V. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential impacts concerning the discovery of human remains, the following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: CR-9 If human remains are encountered, pursuant to State of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. The Riverside County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. Additional procedures for responding to the unanticipated discovery of human remains are outlined below. 40 498 Modern Remains If the Coroner's Office determines the remains are of modern origin, the appropriate law enforcement officials will be called by the Coroner and conduct the required procedures. Work will not resume until law enforcement has released the area. Archaeological Remains If the remains are determined to be archaeological in origin, the appropriate protocol is determined by whether the discovery site is located on federally or non -federally owned or managed lands. Remains Discovered on Federally Owned or Managed Lands After the Coroner has determined that the remains are archaeological or historic in age, the appropriate BLM Palm Springs Field Office or BOR archaeologist must be called. The archaeologist will initiate the proper procedures under the Archaeological Resources Protection Act and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). If the remains can be determined to be Native American, the steps as outlined in NAGPRA, 43 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 10.6 Inadvertent discoveries, must be followed. Resumption of Activity: The activity that resulted in the discovery of human remains on federal lands may resume after a written, binding agreement is executed between the BLM or BOR and federally recognized affiliated Indian Tribe(s) that adopts a recovery plan for the excavation or removal of the human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony following 43 CFR Section 10.3(b)(1) of these regulations. The disposition of all human remains and NAGPRA items shall be carried out following 43 CFR 10.6. Remains Discovered on Non -Federally Owned/Managed Lands After the Coroner has determined the remains on non -federally owned or managed lands are archaeological, the Coroner will make recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the remains to the person responsible for the excavation or discovery, or to his or her authorized representative. If the Coroner believes the remains to be those of a Native American, he/she shall contact the California NAHC by telephone within 24 hours. The NAHC will notify the person it believes to be the most likely descendant (MLD) of the remains. The MLD has 48 hours after accessing the site of the discovery to make recommendations to the landowner for treatment or disposition of the human remains. If the MLD does not make recommendations within 48 hours, the landowner shall reinter the remains in an area of the property secure from further disturbance. If the landowner 41 499 does not accept the descendant's recommendations, the owner or the descendent may request mediation by the NAHC. vi. Finding Related to Disturbance of Human Remains, Including Those Interred Outside of Dedicated Cemeteries: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects concerning human remains described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Draft EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measure CR-9, as recommended in the Final EIR, which has been adopted by the City and is enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Pursuant to the California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 and CEQA Guidelines 15064.5, in the event of discovery or recognition of any human remains in any location other than a dedicated cemetery, there shall be no further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby areas reasonably suspected to overlay adjacent remains. Compliance with these legal requirements, along with implementation of Mitigation Measure CR-9, which requires the presence of a qualified archaeologist and Native American resource monitors during all ground disturbing activities, will ensure that potential impacts relating to human remains will be less than significant. E. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. i. Directly or Indirectly Cause Potential Substantial Adverse Effects, Including the Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death Involving Strong Seismic Ground Shaking: The Project has the potential to experience strong seismic ground shaking, due to the Project's location to regional faults. The Project property is located approximately 10 miles southwest of the closest active fault zone, the San Andreas Fault, which is the controlling fault for the property. ii. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with seismic -related ground shaking, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: GEO-1 The Project developer shall implement the seismic design criteria and parameters, in accordance with ASCE 7-16 and 2019 CBC, as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. GEO-2 The design of foundation and slabs (including bearing pressure recommendations) shall be in conformance with the recommendations of 42 500 the Project structural engineer and as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. iii. Finding Related Potential Substantial Adverse Effects, Including the Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death Involving Strong Seismic Ground Shaking: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to seismic -related ground shaking, described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-1 and GEO-2, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement the MMRP and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: The Project will be constructed in a manner that reduces the risk of seismic hazards (Title 24, California Code of Regulations). According to the Project -specific Geotechnical Evaluation and the 2019 California Building Code (CBC), Site Class D may be used to estimate design seismic loading for the proposed Project's structures. The Site Class is based on the site soil properties in accordance with Chapter 20 of ASCE 7. Site Class D is classified as "stiff soil". The Geotechnical Evaluation indicates that Project property soil conditions can be optimized and outlines seismic design criteria and parameters for the Project to implement in order to reduce impacts to a less than significant level. The design criteria and parameters were developed in accordance with ASCE 7- 16 and 2019 CBC and are included as Mitigation Measure GEO-1. The Project shall also comply with all applicable provisions of the CBC, specifically Chapter 16 of the CBC, Structural Design, Section 1613, Earthquake Loads. Site work will be conducted in accordance with the Project -specific geotechnical and soils analyses required with the submittal of grading and building plans. This is required in Mitigation Measure GEO-2. iv. Potential Substantial Adverse Effects, Including the Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death Due to Seismic -Related Ground Failure, Including Liquefaction: Implementation of the Project has the potential for significant adverse effects associated with strong seismic ground shaking and seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction, due to the active faults in the Project vicinity. V. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: 43 501 GEO-3 Grading and excavations shall be performed in accordance with the City of La Quinta Code and regulations and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications set forth in the Geotechnical Evaluation. Clearing and grubbing of the site shall include removal of any pavement or concrete, turf, landscaping, miscellaneous trash and debris, and disposal of deleterious material offsite. The soil engineering properties of imported soil (if any) shall be evaluated and certified by the Project geologist for use at the development site. GEO-4 Unsuitable earth materials shall be removed prior to placement of compacted fill. Unsuitable materials at the site include undocumented fills and weathered alluvial fan deposits as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation and as otherwise directed by the Project geologist. Excavation and grading to carry Project -serving roadways over the Dike No. 4 levee for the proposed Avenue 62 and Madison Street extensions, as well the Jefferson Street extension over the Dike No. 2 levee, should bench into competent existing fills on the sides with minimal removals on the top (1 to 2 feet). Grading on the levee fill shall be performed under the direction and concurrence of the US Bureau of Reclamation and CVWD. GEO-5 Where project soils require, they shall be overexcavated during grading to be replaced with compacted fill, as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. The proposed grading is anticipated to expose cut and fill transitions at finish grade. Shallow fill areas and cut portions of lots should be overexcavated and replaced with compacted fill to provide a minimum of 4 feet of uniform fill cap over each lot. Streets should be overexcavated 2 feet below subgrade to provide uniform fill below the pavement section. Alternatively, and as recommended by the Project geologist, streets may be overexcavated 2 feet below the deepest utility to reduce the amount of oversize materials encountered and facilitate utility excavation/installation. vi. Finding Related to Seismic -Related Ground Failure, Including Liquefaction: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to seismic -related ground failure, including liquefaction, described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-3 through GEO-5, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, as well as the MMRP and project conditions of approval. 44 502 Facts in Support of Finding: In order to ensure that effects associated with ground failure are less than significant, the Project will be required to comply with the site preparation and foundation recommendations listed in the Project -specific Geotechnical Evaluation. The Geotechnical Evaluation recommends that remedial grading within the planned building areas include the removal, over -excavation and recompaction of unsuitable weathered portions of the soils. Additionally, the removal of any pavement or concrete, turf, landscaping, miscellaneous trash and debris, and disposal of deleterious material that are incompatible for development or materials with insufficient load -bearing capacity to support the onsite structures are recommended. These recommended mitigating measures would ensure that Project soils are absent of debris, organic material, and loose surface soil, and are compacted to provide firm and uniform foundation bearing conditions. Grading activities and removal of unsuitable or otherwise unsuitable soils are prescribed in Mitigation Measures GEO-3 through GEO-5. vii. Substantial Adverse Effects, Including the Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death Involving Seismic -Related Ground Failure, Including Landslides: Implementation of the Project has the potential for significant adverse effects associated with strong seismic ground shaking and seismic -related ground failure, including landslides, due to the active faults in the Project vicinity. The Project is located immediately southwest of Coral Mountain, and immediately north of the Martinez Rockslide landform. The granitic bedrock ridge associated with Coral Mountain at the north end of the Project property was found to generally be fractured and jointed and has been mapped as a potential rockfall hazard. In general, the Project proposes no development to occur within a 100-foot offset from this bedrock ridge. The toe of the Martinez Rockslide landslide consists primarily of boulder material with an elevated slope that is 200 to 300 feet above the adjacent alluvial fan, and therefore, could result in rockfall. The Santa Rosa Mountains are located west of the Project. However, due to the Project's distance from the Santa Rosa Mountains, the Project is not anticipated to induce rockfalls or landslides. viii. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with seismic -related ground failure, including landslides, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: GEO-4 Unsuitable earth materials shall be removed prior to placement of compacted fill. Unsuitable materials at the site include undocumented fills and weathered alluvial fan deposits as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation and as otherwise directed by the Project geologist. Excavation and grading to carry Project -serving roadways over the Dike No. 4 levee for the proposed Avenue 62 and Madison Street extensions, as well the Jefferson Street extension over the Dike No. 2 levee, should bench into competent existing fills on the sides with minimal removals on the top (1 to 2 feet). Grading on the levee fill shall be performed under the direction and concurrence of the US Bureau of Reclamation and CVWD. 45 503 GEO-6 Rockfall hazard analysis should be performed during the design phase if structures are planned within 100 feet of these hillsides (i.e., Coral Mountain and Martinez Rockslide) once plans are further developed to evaluate this hazard and provide site -specific mitigation recommendations (i.e., impact walls or berms/channels), as required. GEO-7 Slopes shall be engineered for stability, including during seismic events, to reduce potential slope failure hazards, as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. GEO-8 Manufactured Slope Maintenance and Protection. To reduce the erosion and surficial slumping potential of the graded slopes, permanent manufactured slopes shall be protected from erosion by concrete lining, riprap, groundcover planting or other appropriate method (i.e., jute matting, polymer coating, etc.) as approved by the Project geologist. These measures shall be applied as soon as practicable. Drainage shall be designed and maintained to collect surface waters and direct them away from manufactured slopes and as required by the Project geologist. GEO-9 Structural setbacks, including those for retaining walls, shall be established as prescribed by the Project geotechnical engineer. ix. Finding Related to Substantial Adverse Effects Including the Risk of Loss, Injury, or Death Involving Seismic -Related Ground Failure, Including Landslides: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to landslides, described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-4, GEO-6 through GEO-9, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: The proposed residential and resort Project components will not be located immediately adjacent to the existing natural landforms. In general, the Project proposes no development to occur within a 100-foot offset from Coral Mountain. However, the Geotechnical Evaluation recommends that a rockfall hazard review and/or analysis should be performed at a later date at this location once plans are further developed to evaluate this hazard and provide refined mitigation recommendations (i.e., additional special buffer, impact walls, berms/channels, etc.) if required. This is indicated as Mitigation Measure GEO-6. Development setbacks will be approximately 950 feet from the toe of the Martinez Rockslide and separated by approximately 301.2 acres of natural open space. Based on the setback distance and lack of potential energy and upslope materials, the 46 504 Geotechnical Evaluation determined that the Project is unlikely to impact the Martinez Rockslide landform. The Project proposes permanent artificial slopes up to 80 feet high that will be cut from and/or underlain by alluvial fan materials. The proposed slopes will be engineered to be globally stable under static and pseudo -static loading conditions and will include remedial removal of inappropriate fill materials. Recommendations set forth in the Project Geotechnical Evaluation for ongoing design engineering will ensure that all manufactured slopes are appropriately designed and constructed (Mitigation Measures GEO-4, GEO-7, and GEO-8). Mitigation strategies that will be applied during Project site development include requirements that the stability of permanent manufactured slopes are protected from erosion. Moreover, the Geotechnical Evaluation establishes setback standards for structures from major manufactured slopes, including but not limited to retaining walls located above descending slopes. Structural setbacks, including those for retaining walls, shall be established as prescribed by the Project consulting geologist (Mitigation Measure GEO-9). The Project shall be required to implement Mitigation Measures GEO-4, and GEO-7 through GEO-9 in order to reduce impacts of permanent slopes to less than significant levels. X. Result in Soil Erosion or Loss of Top Soil: The Project is located in an area with a high and very high Wind Erodibility Rating. The Project property is currently vacant with scattered, low-lying vegetation, and remnants of an abandoned vineyard on approximately 220 acres in the northern portion of the property. The construction of this Project will involve ground disturbing activities, such as the clearing and grubbing of existing vegetation, removal of materials associated with pervious vineyard operations, and grading of the property. Development will also include mass and fine grading associated with manufactured development pads and flood control embankments. These activities will expose large areas of undisturbed land and will substantially increase the potential of soil erosion during development (Draft EIR at p. 4.7-19). In order to reduce the effect of windborne erosion at the Project site, prior to site disturbance, the Project shall submit and implement a City -approved dust control plan that is compliant with the Coachella Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan (PM10 Plan). In addition to windborne erosion, the Project property and affected soils are subject to waterborne erosion which must be managed during and following Project development. The development site is crossed or affected by a series of braided streams and larger drainages transporting large volumes of sand and gravel that could impact the site during and following construction if not properly managed. Existing site drainage is somewhat affected by remnant diversions on the west end of the abandoned vineyard; otherwise, the site and drainages are in a largely natural condition flowing generally west to east. The Guadalupe Dike located along the northern Project property area is a training levee that diverts mountain runoff into the Guadalupe Chanel and terminating in the Dike No. 4 impound area west of the Project property (Draft EIR at p. 4.7-20). Xi. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with erosion, the following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: 47 505 GEO-10 The project proponent shall comply with the most current Construction General Permit (CGP) (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ as amended by 20 10- 00 14-DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ). Compliance with the CGP involves the development and implementation of a Project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which is designed to reduce potential adverse impacts to surface water quality during the period of construction. The SWPPP may include, but is not limited to, the following BMPs: • Temporary Soil Stabilization: sandbag barriers, straw bale barriers, sediment traps, and fiber rolls; • Temporary Sediment Control: hydraulic mulch and geotextiles; • Wind Erosion Control: watering of the construction site, straw mulch; • Tracking Control: staging/storage area and street sweeping; • Non-stormwater Management: clear water diversion and dewatering; and • Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control: vehicle and equipment cleaning, concrete waste management, and contaminated soil management. xii. Finding Related to Soil Erosion or Loss of Topsoil: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to erosion described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-10, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: The Project grading will be performed in accordance with the most current Construction General Permit (CGP) (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-0006- DWQ) to ensure that waterborne erosions of soils is minimized. It will identify the locations and types of construction activities requiring BMPs and other necessary compliance measures to prevent soil erosion and stormwater runoff pollution. The Project shall be required to prepare and implement a City approved Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to Mitigation Measure GEO-10 and will ensure that impacts from waterborne soil erosion are less than significant. As stated above, post -development, the Project will include concrete or riprap-lined and hardened flood control levees on the west and south portions of the Project development site, as well as stormwater retention basins. Soils within the developed portions of the site will be stabilized by landscaping (including gravel and groundcovers, buildings, streets, drainage facilities, and paved areas throughout the property. 48 506 xiii. Located on an Unstable Geologic Unit Resulting in Potential for On -Site or Off -site Lateral Spreading, Subsidence, Liquefaction or Collapse: Liquefaction: The Project is located in an area not susceptible to liquefaction (or subsequent actions such as lateral spreading) due to the lack of shallow groundwater. Collapse: Young alluvial and wind -deposited sediments in the City may be locally susceptible to soil collapse due to their low density, rapid deposition in the desert environment, and the generally dry condition of the upper soils. Based on NMG's evaluation of the existing subsurface borings and laboratory data, the near -surface soil at the site generally consists of weathered, low density and/or porous material and undocumented fill material (associated with vineyard and flood control levee grading). This unsuitable soil is prone to significant soil collapse or consolidation and has poor bearing properties. The Geotechnical Evaluation included hydroconsolidation tests on two relatively undisturbed ring samples collected at depths of 20 to 30 feet. Hydroconsolidation potential of the samples, which can mitigate for low -cohesion soils, was considered to be moderate based on the findings of the Geotechnical Evaluation. xiv. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with development on an unstable geologic unit or expansive soil, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: GEO-3 Grading and excavations shall be performed in accordance with the City of La Quinta Code and regulations and the General Earthwork and Grading Specifications set forth in the Geotechnical Evaluation. Clearing and grubbing of the site shall include removal of any pavement or concrete, turf, landscaping, miscellaneous trash and debris, and disposal of deleterious material offsite. The soil engineering properties of imported soil (if any) shall be evaluated and certified by the Project geologist for use at the development site. GE04 Unsuitable earth materials shall be removed prior to placement of compacted fill. Unsuitable materials at the site include undocumented fills and weathered alluvial fan deposits as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation and as otherwise directed by the Project geologist. Excavation and grading to carry Project -serving roadways over the Dike No. 4 levee for the proposed Avenue 62 and Madison Street extensions, as well the Jefferson Street extension over the Dike No. 2 levee, should bench into competent existing fills on the sides with minimal removals on the top (1 to 2 feet). Grading on the levee fill shall be performed under the direction and concurrence of the US Bureau of Reclamation and CVWD. GEO-5 Where project soils require, they shall be overexcavated during grading to be replaced with compacted fill, as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. The proposed grading is anticipated to expose cut and fill 49 507 transitions at finish grade. Shallow fill areas and cut portions of lots should be overexcavated and replaced with compacted fill to provide a minimum of 4 feet of uniform fill cap over each lot. Streets should be overexcavated 2 feet below subgrade to provide uniform fill below the pavement section. Alternatively, and as recommended by the Project geologist, streets may be overexcavated 2 feet below the deepest utility to reduce the amount of oversize materials encountered and facilitate utility excavation/installation. xv. Finding Regarding On -Site or Off -site Lateral Spreading, Subsidence, Liquefaction or Collapse: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to liquefaction described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-3 through GEO-5, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Although the potential for liquefaction, and subsequent effects (i.e., lateral spread, heaving and differential settling), is considered low at the Project property, development within the Project property will be required to comply with the current California Building Code (CBC) standards, City requirements, the recommendations provided in the Geotechnical Evaluation, and Mitigation Measures GEO-3 through GEO-5. With the implementation of regulatory requirements and mitigation measures, impacts of liquefaction, and the secondary effects of liquefaction, such as lateral spread, will be less than significant. Soil testing determined that onsite soils are considered to have moderate susceptibility to soil collapse. Therefore, the Project shall ensure Project soils and foundations are stable to support the Project buildings. This will be achieved by grading and excavating, and clearing and grubbing any deleterious materials, removing undocumented fills and weathered alluvial fan deposits, and overexcavating during grading and replacing soils with compacted fill. Thus, implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-3 through GEO-5 will reduce impacts of soil collapse at the Project property to less than significant levels. xvi. Located on Expansive Soil: The Geotechnical Evaluation determined that the expansion potential is anticipated to generally range from "very low" to "low". However, development of homes and other project components on the Project site could potentially expose persons and property to substantial damage and harm, which is considered a potentially significant adverse effect. 50 508 xvii. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with development on an unstable geologic unit or expansive soil, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: GEO-2 The design of foundation and slabs (including bearing pressure recommendations) shall be in conformance with the recommendations of the Project structural engineer and as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. GEO-11 Expansion Potential. The expansion potential of the on -site soils is low to very low. In accordance with the Project geotechnical evaluation recommendations, additional laboratory testing shall be performed following completion of grading operations to verify the expansion potential of the near -surface soils. xviii. Finding Regarding Expansive Soils: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to development on expansive soil described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-2 and GEO-11, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the MMRP, Development Agreement, and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: The Project shall comply with the recommendations established within the Project -specific Geotechnical Evaluation to ensure the foundational safety of the Project site. The foundational design recommendations established in the Geotechnical Evaluation are reflected in Mitigation Measure GEO-2. Additionally, the Geotechnical Evaluation recommends that additional laboratory testing be performed following completion of grading operations to determine the expansion potential of the near -surface soils. This is prescribed by Mitigation Measure GEO-11. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures GEO-2 and GEO-11, the impact of expansive soils will be less than significant. xix. Impacts to a Unique Paleontological Resource, Site or Unique Geologic Feature: While no previously recorded paleontological resources have been identified within the Project property and proposed off -site improvement areas, several are known to occur within 3 miles of the Project property from the Lake Cahuilla Beds and/or late Pleistocene alluvial deposits. The Project property crosses multiple geologic units, including alluvium, alluvial fans gravels, 51 509 landslide deposits, and quartz diorite, as well as unmapped Lake Cahuilla beds underlying alluvial deposits at shallow depth. xx. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects on a unique paleontological resource, site or geologic feature, the following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: GEO-12 A qualified professional paleontologist shall prepare a Paleontological Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan and a Worker's Environmental Awareness Program to train the construction crew, both to be implemented during development. xxi. Finding: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for the significant effects relating to paleontological resources described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measure GEO-12, as recommended in the Final EIR, which has been adopted by the City and is enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Pleistocene alluvial deposits, known to contain paleontological resources within 3 miles, likely underlie the Project property, possibly as shallow as 5 feet. The alluvial deposits that are present at the surface within the Project property are too young to preserve fossils but increase in paleontological sensitivity in the subsurface. Less than 1 percent of the property excavation activities will impact sediments to maximum depths of greater than 40 feet below ground surface, including substantial grading, excavating, and trenching. No excavation is expected at a depth greater than 50 feet below ground surface. Ground -disturbing activities associated with Project construction would have the potential to impact geologic units of Moderate (PFYC 3) or High (PFYC 4) paleontological sensitivity, which could result in the damage or destruction of fossil resources should they occur in the Project site near the surface or at depth. Accordingly, Mitigation Measure GEO-12 is adopted to reduce and avoid impacts to paleontological resources to less than significant levels. 52 510 F. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. i. Conflict with an Applicable Plan, Policy or Regulation Adopted for the Purpose of Reducing the Emissions of Greenhouse Gases: The following plans, policies and regulations apply to the Project: the City's GHG Reduction Plan, the SCAG's 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (2020- 2045 RTP/SCS), and CARB's 2022 Scoping Plan. Therefore, the DEIR analyzed the Project's consistency with the plans. The 2012 La Quinta GHG Reduction Plan conducted the community wide and government specific greenhouse gas inventory. The GHG Reduction Plan established policies and programs to achieve the reduction targets. At a minimum, new development is required to adhere to the latest building code standards, which will increase energy efficiency and use of passive and active design features intended to benefit the overall operating efficiency of new buildings. The proposed Project will comply with this requirement by adhering to the applicable building code standards, based on Table 4.8-5, City of La Quinta Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures for New Development, on pages 4.8-19 and 4.8-20 in the DEIR. The Project will encourage and promote energy efficient development that incorporate sustainable design principles, will not impede on the City's carbon neutrality goals, will use a diversified portfolio of energy sources, provide mixed uses to reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled, include facilities for bicycle circulation and parking, comply with all applicable solid waste statues, policies, and guidelines, comply with Title 6, Heath and Sanitation Code which covers the composting regulations, and incorporate accessible waste disposal locations in common and resort areas. SCAG's 2020-2045 RTP/SCS details how the region will address transportation and land use challenges and leverage opportunities in order to support attainment of applicable federal ambient air quality standards and achieve state's GHG emission reduction targets. The RTP/SCS explicitly lays out goals related to housing, transportation technologies, equity and resilience in order to adequately reflect the increasing importance of these topics in the region, and where possible the goals have been developed to link to potential performance measures and targets. The Project will encourage economic growth at the regional and local level by introducing a mix of uses; provide balanced street improvements that include non -motorized options for sidewalks, multipurpose trails, bike lanes, and golf cart/neighborhood electric vehicle lanes; comply with the security and resilience of the regional transportation system; incorporate project design features and mitigation measures to reduce GHG and criteria air pollutant emissions; designate pedestrian paths and trails incorporated into the project's site design allowing for a healthy community; encourage the development of diverse housing types; and ensure that the Project is compatible with the CVMSHCP. (See page 4.8-23 to 4.8-25). The 2017 Scoping Plan reflects the 2030 target of a 40% reduction below 1990 levels, set by Executive Order B-30-15 and codified by SB 32. The project will not conflict with any of the provisions of the 2017 Scoping Plan and in fact supports seven of the action categories, as indicated in Table 4.8-6, Scoping Plan Consistency Summary, on page 4.8-26 in the DEIR. Per Table 4.8-6, the actions in the Scoping Plan to implement SB 350 by 2030, mobile source strategy (cleaner technology fuels), California Sustainable Freight Action Plan, Short -Lived Climate Pollutant Strategy by 2030, and develop Integrated Natural and Working Lands Implementation Plan to 53 511 secure California's land based as a net carbon sink are not applicable to the Project, however, the Project is consistent. The 2022 Scoping Plan recommends project consistency with a locally adopted plan for the regulation of greenhouse gas emissions as the preferred method for CEQA lead agencies to demonstrate that land use projects are consistent with state long-term GHG emission reduction targets. The 2022 Scoping Plan also endorses the use of GHG thresholds adopted by local air districts. As discussed above, the Project is consistent with the City's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Plan. Further, and in order to demonstrate compliance with the SCAQMD GHG efficiency metric and state long-term targets for the reduction of GHG emissions, the Project will implement MM GHG-1 through GHG-II to further reduce Project GHG emissions. ii. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with the conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: GHG-1 Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the project applicant shall purchase a minimum of approximately 408,720 MTCO2e credits (approximately 13,624 MTCO2e per year for 30 years). The purchase of carbon credits must be made from a CARB-approved carbon registry with independent third -party verification. Examples of approved registries include the American Carbon Registry, Climate Action Reserve, and Verra. The applicant shall submit documentation of the offset purchase to the City demonstrating that it mitigates a minimum of approximately 13,624 MTCO2e per year (408,720 MTCO2e over a 30-year period), prior to any occupancy of the site. Alternatively, the project applicant may submit a GHG reduction plan to the City for approval that achieves an equal level of GHG reduction outlined herein. The GHG plan must include enforceable actions that reduce GHG emissions to at or below the total mitigated values presented herein. GHG-2 All residences shall incorporate roof -top solar panels, in -home batteries and EV charger stations to facilitate use of EVs, golf carts and other low -speed electric vehicles (LSEVs). GHG-3 All planned single-family homes shall be electric -ready and shall include electrical circuits for space heating, water heating, cooking/ovens, and clothes dryers, electrical panel, branch circuits, and transfer switch for battery storage. GHG-4 Dedicated circuits and panels in residential and commercial buildings shall be provided to easily convert from natural gas to electric in the future. 54 512 GHG-5 All non-residential components of the development where vehicle parking is provided shall provide EV chargers. GHG-6 All household and other appliances shall be of the highest energy efficiency rating, such as Energy Star, practicable at the time of purchase. GHG-7 To limit and reduce energy use associated with water consumption, all project landscaping shall be desert and other drought tolerant vegetation, consistent with the local development standards. GHG-8 All HVAC systems shall be Very High Efficiency HVAC (SEER 16/80% AFUE or 9 HSPF) or greater efficiency. GHG-9 All domestic hot water systems shall be Very High Efficiency Water Heater (0.92 Energy Factor) with Enhanced Solar Pre -heat System (min. 0.35 Net Solar Fraction). GHG-10 All potable water fixtures shall have EPA WaterSense Certification or greater efficiency. iii. Finding Regarding the Project's Consistency with Applicable Plans, Policies or Regulations Adopted for the Purpose of Reducing the Emissions of Greenhouse Gases: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to the Project's consistency with applicable plans, policies, or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions, described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures GHG-1 through GHG-10, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: In order to demonstrate compliance with the SCAQMD GHG efficiency metric and state long- term targets for the reduction of GHG emissions, the Project will implement MM GHG-1 through GHG-10 to further reduce Project GHG emissions. Mitigation Measures GHG-1 through GHG-10 requires the Project's purchase of carbon credits, the installation of roof -top solar, in -home batteries, and EV charger stations, homes shall be electric -ready and easily convertible from natural gas to electric, household appliances shall have the highest energy efficiency rating (i.e., Energy Star), include desert landscaping to reduce energy use with water consumption, and install high efficiency HVAC systems, hot water systems, and water fixtures. In conclusion, the Project is consistent with the City's Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction Plan, SCAG's RTP/SCS, and 55 513 CARB's Scoping Plan. For this reason, Project impacts on applicable plans, policies or regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases are less than significant. G. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. i. Create a Significant Hazard to the Public or the Environment due to Routine Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Waste, or Hazard through Reasonably Foreseeable Upset and Accident Conditions: Implementation of the Project has the potential to utilize hazardous wastes during construction and operation of the residential and resort property. Construction of the Project will include the clearing and grubbing of remaining vineyard materials, including stockpiles of used trellis slats. It is assumed that the trellis slats were pressure treated, therefore, the associated agricultural waste shall be collected and hauled to an approved landfill. During a site inspection conducted for a Phase I ESA, construction debris, asbestos -cement piping (ACM), and unlabeled, rusted drums and containers the shape and size of paint cans, paint thinner cans, oil, kerosine, and other potentially hazardous materials were discovered onsite. Typical of construction -related activities, it is likely that the Project will use and store hazardous materials (i.e., oils, petroleum -based fuels and other potentially flammable or toxic substances) onsite during development of the Project. Operation of the Project would include residential uses and activities and resort golf activities. Residential land uses do not typically result in the use of excessive amounts of hazardous materials, or the routine transport of hazardous materials. The handling, application, and storage of household cleaning products, paints, solvents, and other related household substances are expected to occur in small quantities. The golf training facility proposed would likely include a storage/maintenance area where golf carts would be stored, serviced and maintained; and another building where landscape equipment as well as hazardous materials associated with landscape maintenance (fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides) would be stored. The golf carts will be stored in a Cart Barn with proper wash bay drainage with clarifier. The maintenance yard for the proposed Project will require proper storage bays that will not allow run off. Wash bays will be required for maintenance equipment, and storage tanks will be required for equipment fuel. Onsite storage and maintenance areas may include hazardous materials associated with landscape maintenance (fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides), as well as the maintenance of golf carts and other equipment used onsite. If the site stores hazardous materials and/or wastes in quantities greater than or equal to 55 gallons of a liquid substance, 500 pounds of a solid substance, or 200 cubic feet of compressed gas, the site is considered a Hazardous Materials Handler. ii. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with the transport, storage, and use or accidental release of hazardous materials, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: HAZ-1 Prior to grading, Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation shall be required. The Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation shall be conducted 56 514 by an Environmental Professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312. • Per Section 312.10, an Environmental Professional is an environmental consultant that has an accredited education in earth or natural science, at least five years of formal training under another environmental professional, a professional state license, and maintains expert knowledge in the environmental geology, sustainability, and engineering fields. • If chemicals exceeding regulatory thresholds are identified during the Phase II study, the Project will develop a Soils Management Plan. The Phase II study will be conducted pursuant to ASTM E1903-19 industry standards. HAZ-2 A site -specific Soils Management Plan (SMP) shall be developed by an Environmental Professional for the Project property if chemical levels exceeding regulatory thresholds are identified during the Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation. The SMP shall be implemented during excavation and grading of the Project, and describe the protocol for managing (potentially contaminated) soils and disposing of (potentially hazardous) debris, as well as guidelines for handling known and/or undocumented subsurface features if discovered. HAZ-3 All agricultural related debris, materials, and foundations shall be removed and hauled to an appropriate landfill prior to land disturbance in the previous vineyard area. If significant soil staining is found at previous storage locations, stained soil shall be excavated and disposed of in an approved landfill. HAZ-4 In compliance with the Construction General Permit (CGP) (Order No. 2009-009-DWQ as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ), the Project shall develop and implement a Project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for construction of the Project. The SWPPP shall include comprehensive handling, storage, and management procedures for building materials, especially those that are hazardous and toxic. The designation of staging areas for activities (i.e., fueling and maintaining vehicles, mixing paints, plaster, mortar, etc.), and storage of hazardous materials (i.e., paints, solvents, pesticides, fuels, oils, etc.) shall be determined in the SWPPP. Best management practices (BMPs) are required in the SWPPP that demonstrate proper material delivery and storage; material use; and spill prevention and control. The SWPPP may include, but is not limited to, the following BMPs: • Temporary Soil Stabilization: sandbag barriers, straw bale barriers, sediment traps, and fiber rolls; 57 515 • Temporary Sediment Control: hydraulic mulch and geotextiles; • Wind Erosion Control: watering of the construction site, straw mulch; • Tracking Control: staging/storage area and street sweeping; • Non-stormwater Management: clear water diversion and dewatering; and • Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control: vehicle and equipment cleaning, concrete waste management, and contaminated soil management. Lastly, and upon Project completion of construction, all hazardous materials shall be removed from the Project site and a Notice of Termination (NOT) shall be filed with the Regional Water Quality Control Board. HAZ-5 Prior to the development of the golf facility storage and maintenance facilities, the applicant shall provide a Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) to the Riverside County Fire Department for review and approval, if necessary. The HMBP shall be kept up to date in a location on -site and be available for review by the Riverside County Fire Department, as needed. HAZ-6 Should any component of the proposed Project require the storage or handling of hazardous materials in quantities greater than or equal to 55 gallons of a liquid substance, 500 pounds of a solid substance, or 200 cubic feet of compressed gas, it shall be required to follow the procedures established in Chapter 6.95 of the HSC, which requires any business handling and/or storing a hazardous material shall obtain a permit from the DEH and electronically submit a business plan in the Statewide Informational Management System, under the administration of the County of Riverside DEH. iii. Finding Regarding the Routine Transport, Use, or Disposal of Hazardous Materials: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to the transport, storage, and use or accidental release of hazardous materials, described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-6, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP and Project conditions of approval. 58 516 Facts in Support of Finding: The previous vineyard operation onsite included the use of trellis slats. Although the site has not operated as a vineyard for approximately 15 years, stockpiles of used trellis slats are located within the property. It is likely that herbicides and pesticides were used during the vineyard operations, which can result in the presence of residual hazardous materials in shallow soils. Additionally, during a site inspection, construction debris, asbestos -cement piping (ACM), and unlabeled, rusted drums and containers the shape and size of paint cans, paint thinner cans, oil, kerosine, and other potentially hazardous materials were discovered onsite. Therefore, Mitigation Measure HAZ-1 is recommended to ensure that residual volatile organic compounds (VOCs), heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and/or pesticides/herbicides originating from prior agricultural uses are appropriately handled during soil site disturbance. Additionally, if hazardous materials are identified that are above acceptable levels, a site -specific Soils Management Plan (SMP) shall be developed for the Project site to describe the protocol for managing and disposing of potentially hazardous soils and debris. The SMP shall be implemented during excavation and grading of the Project, as required by Mitigation Measure HAZ-2. All agricultural related debris, materials, and foundations, including the remaining vineyard trellis system, shall be removed and hauled to an appropriate landfill prior to land disturbance in the previous vineyard area. If significant soil staining is found at previous storage locations, stained soil should be assessed, excavated, and disposed of in an approved landfill (Mitigation Measure HAZ-3). Construction -related activities would result in the use of potentially hazardous materials and other potential pollutant sources (i.e., paints, solvents, pesticides, fuels and oils). However, these are regulated through the implementation of measures required by Construction General Permit (CGP) (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012-0006-DWQ), which requires the development and implementation of a Project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for areas greater than one acre and administered by the RWQCB. Per the CGP, the project's SWPPP shall include comprehensive handling and management procedures for building materials, including those that are hazardous and toxic. Best management practices (BMPs) are required in the SWPPP for proper material delivery and storage; material use; and spill prevention and control. The development and implementation of the SWPPP during construction of the proposed Project, and in compliance with the requirements of the Construction General Permit, is required as Mitigation Measure HAZ-4. As previously stated, this mitigation measure will establish BMPs to ensure the proper use or disposal of hazardous materials and waste associated with construction of the Project. Operation of the Project would include residential uses and activities and resort golf activities. Operation of the golf training facility proposed would likely include a storage/maintenance area where golf carts would be stored, serviced and maintained; and another building where landscape equipment as well as hazardous materials associated with landscape maintenance (fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides) would be stored. If the site stores hazardous materials and/or wastes in quantities greater than or equal to 55 gallons of a liquid substance, 500 pounds of a solid substance, or 200 cubic feet of compressed gas, the site is considered a Hazardous Materials Handler. Thus, a Project -specific Hazardous Materials Business Plan (HMBP) shall be submitted to the Riverside County Fire Department, as required in Mitigation Measure HAZ-5. Additionally, under the administration of the County of Riverside Department of Environmental Health (DEH), and in 59 517 compliance with the Hazardous Materials Release Response Plans and Inventory Law, Chapter 6.95 of the California Health and Safety Code (HSC), any business handling and/or storing a hazardous material shall obtain a permit from the DEH and electronically submit a business plan in the Statewide Informational Management System. This is required as Mitigation Measure HAZ- 6. Mitigation Measures HAZ-5 and HAZ-6 will ensure that impacts due to the use, transport and disposal of hazardous materials would be less than significant during Project operation. iv. Located on a Hazardous Materials Site: Pursuant to Government Code 65962.5 and its subsections, record searches on the Project property were performed within multiple database platforms. The EDR Radius Map Report did not identify the Project site as a hazardous materials site. Although the Project property was not listed as a hazardous materials site pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, the use of hazardous materials prior agricultural operations on approximately 220 acres of the Project could have resulted in the use of hazardous materials onsite. Hazardous material uses potentially associated with agriculture activities includes the application of pesticides and vehicle/equipment maintenance fuel. In addition to the possible use of pesticides and herbicides at the Project site, reconnaissance of the Project site, conducted as part of the Phase I ESA, identified construction debris, asbestos - cement piping (ACM), and unlabeled, rusted drums and containers the shape and size of paint cans, paint thinner cans, oil, kerosine, and other potentially hazardous materials on the southern half of the Project site. Onsite well sites were assumed to be operable during the previous operation of the vineyards, therefore, if onsite wells are determined to be inoperable, they shall be properly capped and abandoned prior to grading activities in the existing well sites areas. Finally, upon inspection of the Project, the presence of asbestos -cement piping was found present within the Project site. V. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with hazardous materials sites, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: HAZ-1 Prior to grading, Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation shall be required. The Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation shall be conducted by an Environmental Professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312. • Per Section 312.10, an Environmental Professional is an environmental consultant that has an accredited education in earth or natural science, at least five years of formal training under another environmental professional, a professional state license, and maintains expert knowledge in the environmental geology, sustainability, and engineering fields. 60 518 • If chemicals exceeding regulatory thresholds are identified during the Phase II study, the Project will develop a Soils Management Plan. The Phase II study will be conducted pursuant to ASTM E 1903-19 industry standards. HAZ-2 A site -specific Soils Management Plan (SMP) shall be developed by an Environmental Professional for the Project property if chemical levels exceeding regulatory thresholds are identified during the Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation. The SMP shall be implemented during excavation and grading of the Project, and describe the protocol for managing (potentially contaminated) soils and disposing of (potentially hazardous) debris, as well as guidelines for handling known and/or undocumented subsurface features if discovered. HAZ-3 All agricultural related debris, materials, and foundations shall be removed and hauled to an appropriate landfill prior to land disturbance in the previous vineyard area. If significant soil staining is found at previous storage locations, stained soil shall be excavated and disposed of in an approved landfill. HAZ-7 If onsite wells are determined to be inoperable, they shall be properly capped and abandoned prior to grading activities in the existing wellsite areas. HAZ-8 The Project shall consult an asbestos inspection consultant for a comprehensive asbestos survey prior to demolition of the Project site. vi. Finding Related to Location on a Hazardous Materials Site: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to hazardous material sites, described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-3, HAZ-7, and HAZ-8, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Although the Project property was not listed as a hazardous materials site pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, the use of hazardous materials prior agricultural operations on approximately 220 acres of the Project could have resulted in the use of hazardous materials onsite. Hazardous material uses potentially associated with agriculture activities includes the application of pesticides and vehicle/equipment maintenance fuel. In addition to the possible use of pesticides and herbicides at the Project site, construction debris, asbestos -cement piping (ACM), and 61 519 unlabeled, rusted drums and containers the shape and size of paint cans, paint thinner cans, oil, kerosine, and other potentially hazardous materials were discovered onsite. Therefore, Mitigation Measure HAZ-I is recommended to ensure that residual volatile organic compounds (VOCs), heavy metals, petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and/or pesticides/herbicides originating from prior agricultural uses are appropriately handled during soil site disturbance. Additionally, if chemical levels are identified that exceed existing acceptable standards, a Soils Management Plan (SMP) shall be developed and implemented during excavation and grading for the Project. The SMP would describe the protocol for managing potentially contaminated soils and disposing of (potentially hazardous) debris, as well as guidelines for handling known and/or undocumented subsurface features that may be encountered. This is required by Mitigation Measure HAZ-2. Moreover, all agricultural related debris, materials, and foundations shall be removed and hauled to an appropriate landfill prior to land disturbance in the previous vineyard area. If significant soil staining is found at previous storage locations, stained soil shall be excavated and disposed of in an approved landfill (Mitigation Measure HAZ-3). Onsite well sites were assumed to be operable during the previous operation of the vineyards, therefore, if onsite wells are determined to be inoperable, they shall be properly capped and abandoned prior to grading activities in the existing well sites areas. The Phase I ESA recommends obtaining a copy of all documents pertaining to the onsite private groundwater wells, if available. Monitoring well conditions should be identified to ensure proper maintenance or abandonment under the appropriate regulatory oversight, as well as practicing caution when developing, grading, or excavating at the project site. This is required by Mitigation Measure HAZ-7. Finally, upon inspection of the Project, the presence of asbestos -cement piping was found present within the Project site. Due to limitations of inspecting the entirety of the Project site and the apparent presence of the asbestos -containing materials (ACMs) and potential asbestos -containing materials (PACMs), the Project shall consult an asbestos inspection consultant for a comprehensive asbestos survey prior to demolition, construction, or remodeling of the project site. ACMs and PCMs in good condition can remain onsite for future use, and managed safely under the regulations of a site -specific Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan or hauled to an approved landfill. Mitigation Measure HAZ-8 shall implement the asbestos inspection consultation and the development of the O&M Plan. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures HAZ-1 through HAZ-3, HAZ-7, and HAZ-8 potential impacts of hazardous materials potentially on the Project site would be reduced to less than significant levels. H. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. i. Result in Substantial Erosion or Siltation On- or Off -Site or Impede or Redirect Flood Flows: The Project setting and its surroundings have been modified by various existing flood control systems to address the offsite alluvial drainages that may affect the site. These include the Guadalupe Creek Diversion Dike that separates the Coral Canyon development site to the north and the subject property. Dike No. 4 provides flood protection for agricultural and urbanizing lands to the east. Two separate systems of earthen barriers currently direct off -site flows from impacting the onsite agricultural land and the offsite Thomas Levy Groundwater Replenishment Facility, respectively. For the agricultural land, the earthen flood protection is established along the western and southern boundaries to divert and convey off -site flows easterly along the unimproved 62 520 alignment of Avenue 62 and northerly along the unimproved alignment of Jefferson Street toward Dike No. 4. For the CVWD Thomas Levy Groundwater Replenishment Facility, the flood control improvements are designed to establish a hydrologic separation between surface runoff and the recharge ponds that receive piped inflow. This is similarly achieved by earthen berms, dikes, and concrete channels also designed to convey off -site runoff in a northerly and easterly direction toward the receiving Dike No. 4 flood control facilities. As proposed, the overall on -site grading and drainage pattern of the Project will continue to emulate existing topography. Project stormwater runoff will be intercepted at and carried along the private street curb and gutter conveyances to multiple catch basins connected to a network of storm drain lines sized to confluence and outlet into the respective detention/infiltration basin (A and B). The outlet points in the basins will include rip -rap treatment as a form of energy dissipation to slow flows and reduce erosion to facilities. To address off -site drainage conditions that interface with and currently pass through the Project site, the proposed improvements include a series of engineered and fortified embankments and channels. The design of this system is identified in detail as a flood protection system in the Drainage Master Plan, which calls for flood control barriers to direct off -site ephemeral drainage in a northerly and easterly direction respectively as it interfaces with the western and southern edges of the Project. ii. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with on- or off -site erosion or siltation or impediments to or redirection of flood flows as a result of the Project, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: HWQ-1 The Operations and Maintenance (O&M) plan shall include provisions to monitor and remove sediment along the west bank to maintain the required conveyance and freeboard conditions. Other aspects of the bank maintenance shall be identified based on the final design configuration of the systems. A Flood Control Facilities Operations and Maintenance Manual for the proposed improvements shall be prepared and submitted to CVWD for review and approval. The manual shall meet the requirements of Section 5.8.9 of the Development Design Manual. iii. Finding Regarding Substantial Erosion or Siltation On- or Off -Site or Impede or Redirect Flood Flows: The City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to substantial erosion or siltation, or flood flow direction, described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measure HWQ-1, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP and Project conditions of approval. 63 521 Facts in Support of Finding: The proposed Project and associated flood control improvements will result in a potential redirection of the off -site flow path, resulting in foreseeable sediment deposition along the west bank of the Project site. Therefore, off -site siltation impacts are potentially significant and Mitigation Measure HWQ-1 would be implemented to monitor and maintain the west bank to the required conveyance and freeboard conditions. With the proposed flood control improvements, design sequence in the Project Design Features, and Mitigation Measure HWQ-1, designed to account for runoff conveyance around the project while taking into consideration the natural erosion and deposition process associated with the active alluvial fan, less than significant impacts are expected pertaining to substantial erosion or siltation, on- or off -site. In addition to the Mitigation Measure HWQ-1, the Project will also include two project design features (PDF) relating to any Project drainage. PDF HWQ-2 requires the Project proponent to obtain an NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Construction General Permit) prior to any grading or final approval. PDF HWQ-3 requires the Project proponent to implement the recommendations of the Project Drainage Study and obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision prior to the issuance of a grading permit. iv. Result in Flood Hazard, Tsunami, or Seiche Zones, Risk of Release from Project Inundation: The entire Project site is located in Zone D, a FEMA designation which applies to areas where there are possible but undetermined or unmapped flood hazards. As currently designated, the site is not mapped as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). In part due to the alluvial fan conditions observed in the project setting, the project -specific Drainage Master Plan serves as the reference document for identifying the existing drainage conditions and necessary flood control measures. The proposed infrastructure will include adequate flood protection to address the local alluvial fan conditions, while protecting the project site from ephemeral drainages without resulting in hydromodifications (Draft EIR pg. 4.10-34). V. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with on- or off -site erosion or siltation or impediments to or redirection of flood flows as a result of the Project, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: HWQ-1 The Operations and Maintenance (O&M) plan shall include provisions to monitor and remove sediment along the west bank to maintain the required conveyance and freeboard conditions. Other aspects of the bank maintenance shall be identified based on the final design configuration of the systems. A Flood Control Facilities Operations and Maintenance Manual for the proposed improvements shall be prepared and submitted to CVWD for review and approval. The manual shall meet the requirements of Section 5.8.9 of the Development Design Manual. 64 522 vi. Finding Regarding Flood Hazard, Tsunami, or Seiche Zones, Risk of Release from Project Inundation: The City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to substantial erosion or siltation, or flood flow direction, described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measure HWQ-1, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Based on the most current Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM No. 06065C2900H), effective April 19, 2017, the entire project site is located in Zone D, a FEMA designation which applies to areas where there are possible but undetermined or unmapped flood hazards. As currently designated, the site is not mapped as a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). FEMA Zone A designations are mapped for a portion of the Guadalupe dike and Dike No. 4 containment areas, found north and east of the Project respectively. In part due to the alluvial fan conditions observed in the project setting, the project -specific Drainage Master Plan serves as the reference document for identifying the existing drainage conditions and necessary flood control measures. The proposed infrastructure will include adequate flood protection to address the local alluvial fan conditions, while protecting the project site from ephemeral drainages without resulting in hydromodifications. With implementation of Mitigation Measure HWQ-1, less than significant impacts are anticipated pertaining to flood hazards. I. NOISE. i. Generation of a Substantial Temporary or Permanent Increase in Ambient Noise Levels in the Vicinity of the Project: The Project -specific Noise Study analyzed the potential impacts resulting from the short-term construction activities associated with the development of the Project. Noise generated by the Project construction equipment will include a combination of graders, excavators, haul trucks, compaction equipment, power tools, concrete mixers, and portable generators that, when combined, can reach high levels. Based on the stages of construction, the noise impacts associated with the proposed Project are expected to create temporarily high noise levels at the nearby receiver locations. Noise levels generated by heavy construction equipment can range from approximately 68 dBA to 80 dBA when measured at 50 feet. The Project property is also located adjacent to the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains (SRSJM) Conservation Area, as designated by the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). Project -related noise may result in impacts to wildlife. As shown in the Project -specific Noise Study, the Travertine Specific Plan Focused Noise Assessment, dated June 17, 2024, and testimony provided to the City, the Project will result in a less than significant permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the Project. 65 523 ii. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential project specific and cumulative effects relating to noise, and to further minimize any noise increases from on- and off -site construction -related activities, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: NOI-1 Grading and building plans shall require Project construction activities comply with the City of La Quinta Municipal Code requirements pertaining to construction noise. N0I-2 During all Project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise sensitive receivers nearest the Project site. N0I-3 The construction contractor shall locate equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction -related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the Project site during all Project construction. N0I4 The construction contractor shall limit construction haul truck deliveries to the hours permitted by the City of La Quinta. The contractor shall also design delivery routes to minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck -related noise. N0I-5 Prior to water well drilling, the construction contractor shall provide temporary a 24-foot-high noise barrier capable of reducing noise during well construction activities to 80 dBA Leq or less. BI0-3 Where the Project is located adjacent to the SRSJM Conservation Area along its western edge, a minimum buffer of 74 feet shall be incorporated between SRSJM undeveloped native desert areas and private homeowner parcels and public gathering areas. Each private homeowner parcel along this western edge shall have fencing at the top of slope with Lexan panels to dampen noise to an appropriate level. BIO-31 Noise: The Project will incorporate setbacks, as specified in the Specific Plan to minimize the effects of noise on wildlife. iii. Finding Regarding Generation of Temporary Increase in Ambient Noise Levels in the Vicinity of the Project: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to noise described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been 66 524 required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures NOI-1 through NOI-5, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: To evaluate whether the Project will generate potentially significant short-term (construction) noise levels at nearest receiver locations, a construction -related daytime noise level threshold of 80 dBA Leq was used as a reasonable threshold to assess the daytime construction noise level impacts. When observed from the nearby off -site receiver locations, the construction noise levels are expected to range from 28.9 to 58.7 dBA Leq, with the highest levels ranging from 40.9 to 58.7 dBA Leq. The construction noise analysis shows that the nearest off -site receiver locations will satisfy the reasonable daytime 80 dBA Leq significance threshold during construction activities (Draft EIR, Table 4.12-14). Although the Project will not generate significant construction noise levels, Mitigation Measures NOI-1 through NOI-5 are set forth to minimize construction noise to the maximum extent practicable. As provided in the DEIR Mitigation Measure NOI-5, prior to any water well drilling, the Project will provide a noise barrier to reduce well construction noise. The noise barrier associated with NOI-5 is specific to the water well drilling. Additionally, the City of La Quinta established construction hours of operation to lessen the impacts of construction noise within Municipal Code Section 6.08.050, as described in Table 4.12-2, Construction Standards. Construction phase trip generation is anticipated to be lower than trip generation at Project buildout, which does not result in potentially significant noise impacts. Therefore„ the construction noise impacts will be less than significant at all off -site receiver locations. The Project property is located adjacent to the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains (SRSJM) Conservation Area, as designated by the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). Where the Project is located adjacent to the SRSJM Conservation Area (along the western edge), a minimum buffer of 74 feet will be incorporated between undeveloped native desert areas and private homeowner parcels and public gathering areas. Each private homeowner parcel along this western edge shall have fencing at the top of slope with Lexan panels to dampen noise to an appropriate level, which, according to the CVMSHCP Land Use Adjacency Guidelines, includes noise levels less than 75 dBA Leq hourly. Per the Lexan panel fence plan, the fencing would include a one -foot block wall, and five feet of Lexan panel fence system with metal support posts. This is required by Mitigation Measure BIO-3. The fencing will include concrete masonry block and will be 6 feet in height. In addition, the Project will adhere to the City's Noise Ordinance. The Project developer shall also adhere to the CVMSHCP Conservation Area Land Use Adjacency Guidelines regarding noise, which requires the Project to incorporate setbacks, berms, and/or walls as applicable to minimize the effects of noise on wildlife pursuant to applicable rules, regulations and guidelines related to land use noise standards. This is required by Mitigation Measure BIO-31 in Section 4.4, Biological Resources, in the Draft EIR. The Project will implement Mitigation Measures BIO-3 and BIO-31 in order to reduce the effects of noise on wildlife to less than significant levels. 67 525 J. PUBLIC SERVICES. i. Result in Substantial Adverse Physical Impacts Associated with the Provision of New or Physically Altered Governmental Facilities, Need for New or Physically Altered Facilities, the Construction of Which Could Cause Significant Environmental Impacts, In Order to Maintain Acceptable Service Ratios, Response Times or Other Performance Objectives for Fire Protection: Development and operation of the proposed Project may cause an incremental increase in demand for emergency services. The closest fire station to the Project property is Station 70, located 4.0 miles north of the property, at 54001 Madison Street. Due to the distance to the nearest fire station and remoteness of the Project property, RCFD indicated that the proposed Project may not be adequately served by fire protection services within the 5-7-minute response time, resulting in potentially significant impact to fire service performance objectives until the proposed Project circulation network is completed. ii. Mitigation Measures: To avoid resulting in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with fire services and response times, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: PS-1: Travertine Fire Master Plan (FMP) was developed to analyze emergency access to the Project and determine and implement strategies at the Project site to improve RCFD and CAL Fire operations and service delivery. The FMP was required to be prepared to address adequate fire protection for the area and mitigate potentially unacceptable response times in the interior of the Project. The FMP further states that conformance to the full circulation plan is required for any additional development beyond Phase 1 of the Project. The later phases of development would include the improvement of Jefferson Street, which would provide emergency access to the Project. Full buildout of the Project is evaluated in this Draft EIR. The Project applicant shall implement the safety measures established in the Travertine Fire Master Plan which include the following: • approved emergency access points; • roadway design standards for fire protection vehicles; • minimum water quantity and pressure necessary for firefighting; All developer plans showing fire system connections shall provide information on the type of fire system that is being installed for the development (e.g., wet -pipe fire sprinkler systems, deluge fire sprinkler systems and dry pipe and precaution fire systems). 68 526 A fire flow of 2,375 gallons per minute for 2-hour duration at 20 psi shall be required at the Project in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. For residential areas, approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection, with no portion of any lot frontage more than a maximum of 500 feet from the hydrant shall be provided. Minimum fire flow for all residential structures shall be 875 gallons per minute for a 1-hour duration at 20 psi operating pressure. Fire hydrant spacing shall be in accordance with Appendix C of the California Fire Code. Both requirements must be available prior to placing any combustible materials on the job site. The fire system plans shall be submitted to CVWD to review the complexity and type of proposed fire system. PS-2: Adequate fire protection for the area will be ensured through the following enhanced mitigation measures. • Fire Flows and Hydrants: o Consistent with calculation procedure set forth in Appendix B of the California Fire Code, the project is required to ensure a fire flow of 2,375 gallons per minute for 2-hour duration at 20-psi. o For residential areas, an approved standard fire hydrant, located at each intersection, with no portion of any lot frontage more than a maximum of 500-feet from a hydrant shall be provided. o Minimum fire flow for all residential structures shall be 875 gallons per minute for a 1-hour duration at 20-psi operating pressure. o Fire hydrant spacing shall be in accordance with Appendix C of the current edition of the California Fire Code. o Conforming fire hydrants and flows must be available prior to placing any combustible materials on the job site. • 5A Level Construction Standards: Many buildings will require or benefit from utilizing more than one construction type, which is determined by factors such as code or durability requirements, architectural design, and construction costs. In these cases, portion(s) of the building are separated by construction type with a fire rated wall or horizontal (floor) assembly, allowing each area to be treated as a separate building for meeting building code requirements. For Phase 1, all construction standards are subject to 5A, Type V-A, level building standards. Type V-A refers to uses of 69 527 protected Wood Frames, commonly used in the construction of newer apartment buildings; there is no exposed wood visible and non-combustible materials are generally used. Non-combustible materials generally include concrete, masonry, and steel building elements while combustible material typically refers to wood framed building elements that do not meet heavy timber requirements. Type A is preferred because it is construction that uses protected — structural members which have additional fire rating coating or cover by means of spray -on, sheetrock, or other approved method that increases the fire resistance rating by at least 1-hour; whereas, Type B is Unprotected — Structural members which have no additional coating or cover. • Emergency Standby Power Facilities for Booster Pumps: The project site will provide adequate space for a diesel fueled standby generator in a recessed concrete structure, to be located at both booster pump locations. The generators shall be sized to operate at connected load (full site load) of the designed station. The installation and testing of this equipment will be performed by CVWD. • Fire SystemsBackflow Requirements: All developer plans showing fire system connections shall provide information on the type of fire system that is being installed for the development (e.g. wet -pipe fire sprinkler systems, deluge fire sprinkler systems and dry pipe and pre -action fire systems). The developer's engineer shall fill out and check the appropriate fire system box on the CVWD Plan Check checklist for domestic water. Upon request for additional information on the fire system, the fire system plans shall be submitted to CVWD to review the complexity and type of proposed fire system so the degree of hazard can be assessed. Because a fire system design can vary, the level of backflow protection will be based on the type of potential cross -connection and the degree of hazard. The three types of backflow protection that will be considered are: (1) Single (lead free) Detector Check, below ground installation; (2) Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA), above ground installation; and (3) Reduced Pressure Detector Assembly (RPDA), above ground installation. • Optic -con Sensors at Project Development Gates: The project will provide Opti-con sensors that are strategically located so gates are open when the engines arrive. Precise locations will be determined at the Final Map stage of development. See Exhibit 3.1 Mitigation Diagram for conceptual locations. 70 528 • Community Emergency Response Team (FEMA) Programs: Community Emergency Response Team (FEMA) Programs providing the community with regular training, coordination and communication. The "Travertine CERT" program will develop and maintain a roster of residents/staff that will collectively and individually support and assist during an emergency event or major disaster. • HOA/Community Training for CPR and AED Training: CPR and AED Training will be coordinated and provided by the HOTA/Community for staff and residents to provide an increased population of informed bystanders that are able to assess and initiate life saving measures while emergency responders are en route. This extends the preservation of life at critical times during a health emergency. • AED Devices: AED devices will be made available at public accessible locations within the community. • Additional Community Risk Reduction programs: The HOA/Community shall provide risk reduction programs, including but not limited to Youth Drowning Prevention. iii. Finding Regarding Substantial Adverse Physical Impacts Associated With the Provision of New or Physically Altered Governmental Facilities, the Construction of Which Could Cause Significant Environmental Impacts in Order to Maintain Acceptable Response Times for Fire Protection: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to fire service, described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures PS -I and PS-2, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: The Project property is served by the Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD) under contract with CalFire. Within the City, there are three City -owned fire stations which include Fire Station 32, Station 70, and Station 93. Fire Station 70 is the closest station to the Project property, located approximately 4 miles north, and is equipped with a primary engine, a brush fire engine, and a volunteer squad (see pages 4.14-1 and 4.14-12, as well as Section 4.19, Wildfires). Development and operation of the proposed Project may cause an incremental increase in demand for emergency services. Due to the distance to the nearest fire station and remoteness of the Project property, 71 529 RCFD indicated that the proposed Project may not be adequately served by fire protection services within the 5-7-minute response time, resulting in potentially significant impact to fire service performance objectives until the proposed Project circulation network is completed. Therefore, a Project -specific Fire Master Plan (IMP) was developed to analyze emergency access to the Project property and determine and implement strategies at the Project property to improve RCFD and CAL Fire operations and service delivery before Jefferson Street improvements are completed (Mitigation Measure PS-1). The FMP ensures adequate access to the interior of the Project property by providing Fire Department approved emergency access points, roadway design standards for fire protection vehicles, minimum water quantity and pressure necessary for firefighting, building construction standards, emergency power facilities for the proposed booster stations and an area of refuge. The Plan further states that conformance to the full circulation plan is required for any additional development beyond Phase 1 of the Project. The later phases of development would include the improvement of Jefferson Street, which would provide an additional access to the Project property. See Mitigation Measure PS-1. Enhanced Fire Service Measures (Mitigation Measure PS-2) will address building construction standards, emergency power facilities for the proposed booster stations, an area of refuge, optic - con sensors located to open gates ahead of fire engine arrival, implementation of a community emergency response team (CEMA) programs; and HOA/community training for CPR and AED and risk reduction programs. The County Fire Department has preliminary plans for a future fire station to serve the southern portion of the City. A potential fire station site has been identified at the northeast corner of Monroe Street and Avenue 60. The response time from this potential location to the Project property is approximately 6 minutes. The Travertine Project will be required to provide the fair share portion of development fees for fire station funding consistent with the City's adopted Mitigation Fee Act nexus study and capital improvement plan. The new fire station will be necessary to meet planned and anticipated development whether or not the Project is approved. With implementation of Mitigation Measures PS-1 and PS-2, Project impacts to fire service will be less than significant. The Project would be required to implement all applicable fire safety requirements, to include the installation of fire hydrants, and sprinkler systems. Moreover, the Project would be required to pay Development Impact Fees (DIF) in place at the time of construction. The current per unit DIF for detached single-family residential is $9,380. Payment of these fees goes towards the funding of public facilities including but not limited to fire stations, park and recreation facilities, major thoroughfares and bridges and traffic signalization, public safety facilities and other public buildings. K. TRANSPORTATION. i. Consistency with an Applicable Plan or Policy Addressing the Circulation System: The proposed Project would add traffic to area roadways that could result in significant changes in the level of service at area intersections and thus potentially conflict with a program plan, ordinance, or policy addressing the circulation system, which is considered a potentially significant adverse effect. 72 530 ii. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential project specific and cumulative effects relating to traffic and transportation, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: TRA-1 Project mitigation may include a combination of a fair share of fee payments to the affected jurisdiction, construction of specific improvements and reimbursement to the Project proponent to account for proponent fair share of improvement, or a combination of these approaches. The Summary of 2040 Intersection Improvements is provided in Table 4.16-26 of the DEIR, pages 4.16-56, 57 & 58) and are identified below: Phase 1 Improvements: Improvements to Avenue 62 and Emergency Vehicle Access (EVA) Road and project access points, and the project's fair share contributions toward planned traffic signals and related improvements at 23 area intersections as identified in Table 4.16-26 (see pages 4.16-56 — 4.16-58 of Draft EIR). Phase 2 Improvements: Improvements to Jefferson Street and project access points. iii. Finding Regarding Consistency with Applicable Plan or Policy Addressing Circulation System: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to traffic and transportation described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-1 and construction of the conditioned traffic improvements described above, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the Development Agreement, MMRP, and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Project Operations: Traffic related to Project activities (both construction and operational) were analyzed in the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) and Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT) Evaluation (Draft EIR, Appendices L.1 and L.2). The TIA was prepared in accordance with the City of La Quinta's Traffic Study Guidelines (Engineering Bulletin #06-13, dated July 23, 2015) and Engineering Bulletin #10-01, dated August 9, 2010, the City General Plan, and a traffic study scope reviewed and approved by City staff during the scoping process. At project buildout, the proposed Project would be anticipated to generate a net total of 11,321 external trip -ends per day on a typical weekday with 812 external vehicles per hour (VPH) during the weekday AM peak hour and 1,057 external VPH during the weekday PM peak hour. Under build out conditions, thirteen study area intersections will be impacted without the development of the Project (DEIR Table 4.16-15, p. 4.16-26, and 27). The addition of the Project would result in 73 531 a total of fifteen impacted intersections under build out conditions. Project and Capital Improvement Program (CIP) improvements will result in acceptable LOS for all intersections. Mitigation Measure TRA-1 requires payment of the City's DIF, which funds the traffic improvements in the CIP program, which will result in less than significant impacts at all area intersections. In addition, all study roadway segments analyzed are anticipated to operate at acceptable volume -to -capacity ratio of 0.90 or less at buildout. The County Congestion Management Plan (CMP) requires a LOS E or better for regional roadways. The generation, distribution, and management of project traffic is not expected to conflict with the CMP; no CMP roadways occur in the vicinity of the project. The Project and background traffic would not exceed City level of service standards or travel demand measures, or other standards established by the City or Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) for designated roads or highways. Following the payment of required fees such as TUMF and DIF, as required under Mitigation Measure TRA-1, less than significant impacts are anticipated relative to the CMP. iv. Substantially Increase Hazards Due to Geometric Design Features or Incompatible Uses: Temporary impacts may occur during the construction of infrastructure improvements serving the Project, including offsite roadway and infrastructure, which includes five CVWD wells and an IID substation. Construction of these infrastructure improvements would cause short-term impacts related to noise, dust, and traffic flows as a result of temporary lane closures, if required. To minimize potential temporary traffic flow impacts during construction, a detailed construction traffic management plan(s) shall be prepared and submitted to the City of La Quinta. Mitigation Measure TRA-2 would substantially reduce the temporary short-term construction related traffic impacts to a level of less than significant. V. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential effects relating to traffic hazards, the following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: TRA-2 The Project proponent shall ensure that Construction Traffic Control Plans are reviewed and approved by the City prior to project construction. These plans are to be implemented during construction activities. Construction includes onsite and offsite improvements. Prior to obtaining a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare and submit the City of La Quinta for review and approval detailed construction traffic management plans, including street closure information, detour plans, haul routes, and staging plans as necessary for any off -site work that would encroach on public right-of-way. The construction traffic management plans shall include the following elements, as appropriate: 74 532 • Provisions for temporary traffic control during all construction activities adjacent to public right-of-way to improve traffic flow on public roadways (e.g., flag person); • Construction -related vehicles shall not park on surrounding public streets; • Provision of safety precautions for pedestrians and bicyclists through such measures as alternate routing and protection barriers; • Schedule construction -related deliveries to reduce travel during peak travel periods; • Obtain the required permits for truck haul routes from the County of Riverside, the City of Rancho Mirage, the City of Palm Desert, and Cathedral City prior to the issuance of any permit for the Project; and • Obtain a Caltrans transportation permit for use of oversized transport vehicles on Caltrans facilities. • Outline adequate measures to ensure emergency vehicle access during all aspects of the Project's construction, including, but not limited to, the use of flagmen during partial closures to streets surrounding the Project site to facilitate the traffic flow until construction is complete. • Include the implementation of security measures during construction in areas that are accessible to the general public to help reduce any increased demand on law enforcement services, including fencing construction areas, providing security lighting, and providing security personnel to patrol construction sites. vi. Finding Regarding Hazards Due to Geometric Design Features or Incompatible Uses: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to traffic and transportation hazards described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures TRA-2, as recommended in the Final EIR, which has been adopted by the City and is enforceable through the Development Agreement, Specific Plan, MMRP, and project conditions of approval. 75 533 Facts in Support of Finding: As provided in Mitigation Measure TRA-2, Traffic Control Plans will be implemented during construction activities. These plans will reduce potential impacts that may arise due to conflicts with construction traffic, consistent with City standards. Accordingly, the Project is not anticipated to increase hazards due to geometric design features or incompatible uses. Following implementation of the mitigation measure, as well as the City review and approval process for all improvement plans, impacts will be less than significant. vii. Emergency Access: The Project property is located in a relatively isolated area surrounded on the west and south by undeveloped native desert within and adjacent to the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area; on the east by agricultural land and residential communities, and on the north and northeast by Coral Mountain, and the CVWD groundwater recharge facilities and Dike No. 4 impoundment area. There is currently no access to the Project property except from an unpaved road from the north which approximates the future alignment of Jefferson Street south of Avenue 58. On the east, Avenue 62 stops at the toe of Dike No. 4 with CVWD gates that restrict access onto Dike 4. Future access would be provided by the permanent extension of Jefferson Street south of Avenue 58, from the extension of Avenue 62 across the dike and the extension of Madison Street south of Avenue 60 and over Dike 4. Design standards for the main road through the Project site that will be created by the extension of Jefferson Street and Avenue 62 are included in the Project as design features. Mitigation Measure TIA-1 provides offsite roadway improvement requirements. Additionally, all roadway design shall be reviewed and approved by the City and Fire Department. With implementation of mitigation measures, standard conditions, and design features, including roadway design review and approval, impacts associated with the emergency access would be reduced to a less than significant impact. A Fire Master Plan for the Travertine Specific Plan Project property was established to provide in depth information to aid in determining the level of service proposed for the property during construction and operation of the Project. Emergency response plans and evacuation plans during Project development were established in the Project's Fire Master Plan. For additional discussion of the Fire Master Plan, see Section 4.19, Wildfires, of the DEIR. viii. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential project effects relating to emergency access, the following mitigation measure is hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: TRA-1 Project mitigation may include a combination of a fair share of fee payments to the affected jurisdiction, construction of specific improvements and reimbursement to the Project proponent to account for proponent fair share of improvement, or a combination of these approaches. 76 534 ix. Finding Regarding Emergency Access: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to emergency access described above and further discussed in the Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measure TRA-1, as recommended in the Final EIR, which has been adopted by the City and is enforceable through the Development Agreement, Specific Plan, MMRP, and project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: Improvements to access roads to the site and the internal circulation system would provide adequate fire department access. Final layout and site access design shall be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic Engineer as well as the Fire Department to ensure compliance with their established standards. A combination of construction of specific improvements or a fair share of fee payments to the affected jurisdiction (Mitigation Measure TRA-1) will reduce impacts that may arise associated with emergency access. Therefore, the Project, is not anticipated to result in inadequate emergency access, and with mitigation, impacts will be less than significant. L. TRIBAL CULTURAL RESOURCES. i. Impacts to Significant Tribal Cultural Resources: The 2021 Cultural Report identified 37 previously recorded resources and nine new resources within the Project area of potential effects (APE). Of the 37 previously recorded resources, ten historical or archaeological resources within the Project APE were recommended eligible for listing in the NRHP or CRHR. They include Sites P-33-001331, P-33-003872, P-33-003873, P- 33-003874, P-33-005323, P-33-014844, P-33-014845, P-33-014846, and P-33-014847; and P-33- 014988. The nine new resources recorded by SWCA during the 2019-2020 efforts included six sites and three isolates. Specifically, the resources consist of two prehistoric isolates, each consisting of two ceramic sherds; one historic isolate consisting of four crushed pull -tab cans; three historic -era refuse scatters; and three prehistoric archaeological sites. None of the newly identified resources were recommended eligible for the NRHP or CRHR. Of the recommended eligible resources, SWCA determined that Site P-33-014988, which included prehistoric milling slicks, is individually eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR). The remaining nine resources appear associated with one another and consist of prehistoric milling slicks, ceramic scatter, bedrock milling station and a habitation site, and are recommended eligible as contributors to the Martinez Mountain Rockslide District (MMRD). Although not specifically identified as a Tribal Cultural Resource, the MMRD has a temporal affiliation to the Late Prehistoric period that is significant for the prehistory and to the contemporary tribal communities of the region. Based on its association with the Late Prehistoric period, the MMRD is recommended eligible for listing 77 535 to the NRHP Criterion A and CRHR Criterion 1, as well as NRHP Criterion D and CRHR Criterion 4 because it could yield data that are relevant to the prehistory of the region. Based on the Project site investigations conducted between 2006 and 2021, inclusive, SWCA determined that the proposed Project avoids impacts to significant archaeological sites located within the APE. Specifically, the Project boundary avoids disturbances to all historic properties and historic and archaeological resources in and near the APE. A planned open space land use area has been established in the southern portion of the site to buffer identified MMRD resources. This area is currently designated for Open Space Natural uses (Planning Area 20) and will not be developed. The area of direct impacts (ADI), which includes all areas proposed effected by Project construction within the broader APE, completely avoids all resources that are eligible either individually or as contributors to the MMRD. These resources are now located within designated open space natural areas, which allows for their long-term protection and conservation. The City of La Quinta initiated an updated AB 52 consultation period in 2020. The City sent a letter to Native American Tribes suggested by the NAHC on March 3, 2020. The City did not receive comments from the Tribes during the 30-day comment period. Although responses were not received, the Applicant requested a meeting with the ACBCI to discuss the Tribe's past participation. Meetings were held on July 21, 30, and August 13, 2020 with the ACBCI to discuss the Project and necessary mitigation measures. On August 11, 2020, the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians (TMDCI) called the City to inquire about projects within the City. The City notified the TMDCI of the Travertine Project and emailed them the cultural studies. TMDCI attended the meeting with the City and the ACBCI on September 3, 2020. Table 4.17-1 in the Draft EIR, outlines the various meetings held by the City with the ACBCI and the TMDCI. ii. Mitigation Measures: To mitigate potential project specific and cumulative effects relating to Tribal Cultural Resources, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: CR-1 Prior to any ground -disturbing activities, the Project applicant shall retain a qualified archaeologist, defined as an archaeologist that meets the Secretary of Interior's Standards for professional archaeology, to carry out all mitigation measures related to cultural resources. Tribal monitoring of site disturbance will also be accommodated. CR-2 The Project applicant shall assign a compliance officer for the Project to ensure mitigation measures are in place and followed for the duration of Project construction. The compliance officer should prepare a monthly compliance report for distribution to the City, BOR, BLM, and interested Native American groups. The compliance officer may be the same person as the Project archaeologist or may be another qualified individual designated by the Project applicant. CR-3 Prior to the commencement of ground disturbance, a Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (Monitoring Plan) shall be 78 536 prepared. The Monitoring Plan shall include, but not be limited to: principles and procedures for the identification of cultural resources monitoring protocols consistent with CR-1, CR-2, and CR-7 for ground - disturbing activities, a worker training program consistent with CR-6, and discovery and processing protocols for inadvertent discoveries of cultural resources consistent with CR-7 and CR-8. The plan shall detail protocols for determining circumstances in which additional or reduced levels of monitoring (e.g., spot checking) may be appropriate. Fencing with a buffer shall be placed around resources to be avoided. The Monitoring Plan shall also establish a protocol for communicating with the lead agencies and interested Native American parties. CR-4 Prior to ground -disturbing activities in any areas outside the APE described in the Project EIR, Exhibit 4.5-1, including but not limited to locations proposed for an off -site utility area, a supplemental study including an updated records search at the EIC, updated Sacred Lands File search, and pedestrian survey, shall be conducted. If resources are identified and cannot be avoided, they shall be assessed for their eligibility for the NRHP and CRHR. Avoidance and minimization measures identified as a result of the study shall be incorporated into the Monitoring Plan. CR-5 In the event of unanticipated discovery of NRHP- and CRHR-eligible resources within the APE or the off -site utility field, where operationally feasible, such resources shall be protected from direct Project impacts by Project redesign (i.e., relocation of the ground disturbance, ancillary facilities, or temporary facilities or work areas). Avoidance mechanisms shall include temporary fencing and designation of such areas as environmentally sensitive areas (ESAs) for the duration of the proposed Project. ESAs shall include the boundary of each historic property plus a 30-m (98-foot) buffer around the resource. CR-6 Prior to the commencement of ground -disturbing activities, typically at the Project kick-off, the qualified archaeologist or their designee will provide cultural sensitivity training to construction crews. The training will provide information on signs of potential cultural resources, regulatory requirements for the protection of cultural resources and the proper procedures to follow should unanticipated cultural resources discoveries be made during construction. Workers will be provided contact information and protocols to follow if inadvertent discoveries are made. Workers will be shown examples of the types of Tribal cultural resources that might be encountered and that would require notification of the Project archaeologist. The Project archaeologist shall create a training video, PowerPoint presentation, or printed literature that can be shown to new workers and contractors to avoid continuous training throughout the life of the Project. CR-7 Prior to ground disturbance, an archaeological monitor, working under the supervision of the qualified archaeologist, and Native American monitors 79 537 from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, shall be retained to monitor ground -disturbing activities. Monitoring will take place within or near ESAs or in other areas agreed upon by the archaeologist, City, and Native American monitor, and as identified in the Monitoring Plan. Monitoring activities will include examining the excavation of native soils as well as the disposal of spoils in certain areas. The duration, timing and location of the monitoring shall be determined by the City in consultation with the qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors as outlined in the Monitoring Plan. Should buried cultural deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer. Additionally, fencing with a buffer shall be required around resources to be avoided. CR-8 In the event that cultural resources are exposed during excavation, work in the immediate vicinity of the find must stop until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find. Ground -disturbing activities may continue in other areas. For discoveries located outside of BLM land, if the City determines, in consideration of the subsequent analysis by the qualified archaeologist, that the resource is a protected resource under CEQA (Section 15064.5f; PRC 21082) additional work such as testing or data recovery may be warranted prior to resumption of ground -disturbing activity in the location of discovery. For discoveries located on BLM-land, if the BLM determines, in consideration of the subsequent analysis of the qualified archaeologist, that the resource is protected under Section 106 of the NHPA, additional work such as testing or data recovery may be warranted prior to resumption of ground -disturbing activity in the location of discovery. Should any Tribal cultural resources be encountered, additional consultation with California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)—listed Tribal groups should be conducted in coordination with the City and/or with the BLM and BOR if the discovery occurs on federal lands. CR-9 If human remains are encountered, pursuant to State of California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, no further disturbance shall occur until the Riverside County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. The Riverside County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. Additional procedures for responding to the unanticipated discovery of human remains are outlined below. Modern Remains If the Coroner's Office determines the remains are of modern origin, the appropriate law enforcement officials will be called by the Coroner and 80 538 conduct the required procedures. Work will not resume until law enforcement has released the area. Archaeological Remains If the remains are determined to be archaeological in origin, the appropriate protocol is determined by whether the discovery site is located on federally or non -federally owned or managed lands. Remains Discovered on Federally Owned or Managed Lands After the Coroner has determined that the remains are archaeological or historic in age, the appropriate BLM Palm Springs Field Office or BOR archaeologist must be called. The archaeologist will initiate the proper procedures under the Archaeological Resources Protection Act and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). If the remains can be determined to be Native American, the steps as outlined in NAGPRA, 43 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 10.6 Inadvertent discoveries, must be followed. Resumption of Activity: The activity that resulted in the discovery of human remains on federal lands may resume after a written, binding agreement is executed between the BLM or BOR and federally recognized affiliated Indian Tribe(s) that adopts a recovery plan for the excavation or removal of the human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony following 43 CFR Section 10.3(b)(1) of these regulations. The disposition of all human remains and NAGPRA items shall be carried out following 43 CFR 10.6. Remains Discovered on Non -Federally Owned/Managed Lands After the Coroner has determined the remains on non -federally owned or managed lands are archaeological, the Coroner will make recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the remains to the person responsible for the excavation or discovery, or to his or her authorized representative. If the Coroner believes the remains to be those of a Native American, he/she shall contact the California NAHC by telephone within 24 hours. The NAHC will notify the person it believes to be the most likely descendant (MLD) of the remains. The MLD has 48 hours after accessing the site of the discovery to make recommendations to the landowner for treatment or disposition of the human remains. If the MLD does not make recommendations within 48 hours, the landowner shall reinter the remains in an area of the property secure from further disturbance. If the landowner does not accept the descendant's recommendations, the owner or the descendent may request mediation by the NAHC. 81 539 iii. Finding Regarding Impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources: Pursuant to Section 21081(a)(1) of the Public Resources Code and Section 15091(a)(1) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council finds that, for each of the significant effects relating to Tribal Cultural Resources described above and further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effects as identified in the Final EIR, and further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-9, as recommended in the Final EIR, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the MMRP, Development Agreement, and Project conditions of approval. Facts in Support of Finding: As stated above, SWCA's investigations in 2006 and 2021 determined that the proposed Project avoids impacts to significant archaeological sites located within the APE. Specifically, the Project boundary avoids disturbances to all historic properties and historic and archaeological resources in and near the APE. A planned open space land use area has been established in the southern portion of the site to buffer identified MMRD resources. This area is currently designated for Open Space Natural uses (Planning Area 20) and will not be developed. The area of direct impacts (ADI), which includes all areas proposed effected by Project construction within the broader APE, completely avoids all resources that are eligible either individually or as contributors to the MMRD. These resources are now located within designated open space natural areas, which allows for their long-term protection and conservation. Although the Project will avoid impacts to cultural resources, the Project applicant shall be required to prepare a monitoring and mitigation program plan to implement strategies for avoiding impacts to Tribal cultural resources, provide cultural sensitivity training to construction crew, and retain a qualified archaeologist and/or a compliance officer to implement the mitigation measures and training, and an archaeological monitor during certain ground -disturbing activities, as well as implement avoidance mechanisms for environmentally sensitive areas. This is required by Mitigation Measure CR-1 through CR-3, and CR-5 through CR-7. Mitigation Measure CR-8 requires that if cultural resources are exposed during excavations, work in the immediate vicinity of the find must stop until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find. To ensure avoidance of previously identified and any unidentified cultural resources occurring in the utility field, a records search at the Eastern Information Center (EIC), an updated Sacred Lands File search, and a pedestrian survey of prospective well and substation sites shall be conducted to confirm the presence or absence of potentially sensitive cultural resources shall be required. Additionally, continued outreach to local Tribes and Tribal involvement in site monitoring shall be required. Development should be avoided in areas identified in the Cultural Report, and within the western halves of Section 35 and 26 of township 6 south, Range 7 East. This is required by Mitigation Measures CR-4, CR-7, and CR-8. With the implementation of Mitigation Measures CR-1 through CR-8 the proposed Project's impact to Tribal cultural resource to be listed or eligible for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources or in a Local Register of Historical Resources is reduced to less than 82 540 significant levels. Moreover, the proposed distribution lines connecting the substation to other facilities and to the Project would occur within existing rights -of -way, which have already been disturbed. Therefore, the undergrounding of the distribution lines would not result in significant impacts to Tribal cultural resources. During tribal consultation, the City met with the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) and the TMDCI. The TMDCI provided feedback on resource protection measures in a meeting between the Project applicant, the City, and SWCA on September 22, 2020. This included a request for monitors to be present for both excavation and for observing areas where the excavated soils will be used as fill to ensure that no artifacts are inadvertently transferred to new portions of the Project area. The TMDCI indicated that excavations over 10 feet deep would not need to be monitored and that the two interested Tribes could work together to provide monitors as needed (i.e., one monitor could represent both Tribes). However, after the meeting on September 28, 2020 the TMDCI did not provide a written letter with recommendations, as requested by the City. Communication from the Tribe stopped although the City made multiple attempts to follow-up with the TMDCI. In a letter dated September 28, 2020, the ACBCI thanked the City in their efforts to include the THPO and stated that the concerns of the Tribe THPO were addressed and proper mitigation measures have been proposed to ensure the protection of Tribal cultural resources. The letter concluded the AB 52 consultation efforts. However, the THPO requested the following: • An Avoidance Mitigation Plan developed in consultation with the Tribes. This plan shall address process and procedures for avoiding and mitigating impacts to cultural resources and historic properties; • The City require fencing with a buffer placed around resources to be avoided; • The City assign a Compliance Officer to ensure mitigation measures are in place and followed during the duration of the Project with a monthly report on compliance; and • The City require Cultural Sensitivity Training for all construction crew members. Although no Tribal cultural resources were identified within the development portion of the Project property during AB 52 consultation, Mitigation Measure CR-7 requires that the Project applicant hire an approved Native American Monitor during certain ground disturbing activities. The Project site would be initially subject to grubbing and grading, in which the Project applicant would be responsible for hiring a Native American Monitor during grading activities to depths of 10 feet. The Project applicant shall also be required to retain a qualified archaeologist (Mitigation Measure CR-1). The archaeologist shall provide cultural sensitivity training (Mitigation Measure CR-6) and prepare a Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (Mitigation Measure CR-3). Additionally, prior to ground disturbance, an archaeological monitor, working under the supervision of the qualified archaeologist, and Native American monitors from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and/or the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, shall be retained to monitor certain ground -disturbing activities (Mitigation Measure CR-7). If Tribal cultural resources are encountered, additional consultation with California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)-listed Tribal groups should be conducted immediately (Mitigation Measure CR-8). A compliance officer shall also be retained to ensure mitigation measures are in place and 83 541 followed for the duration of the Project (Mitigation Measure CR-2). With the implementation of Mitigation Measures CR-1, CR-2, CR-3, CR-6, CR-7, and CR-8, impacts will be reduced to less than significant. M. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. i. Require or Result in Construction of New or Expanded Facilities for Water, Wastewater, Drainage or Utilities, the Construction of Which May Cause Significant Environmental Effects: Storm Water Facilities: The Project property's current hydrologic setting is defined by the eastern slopes of the Santa Rosa Mountains, and the various associated canyon drainages (Devil Canyon and unnamed smaller drainages) west of the Project property; the Guadalupe Channel and the Coral Mountain formation north of the Project property; and the BOR Dike No. 4 Levee and associated stormwater impound (i.e., Thomas Levy Groundwater Replenishment Facility) to the east. These natural and manmade features allow water to flow from the mountains and canyons easterly along distributary flow paths and active alluvial fan conveyances to the engineered retention area on the west side of Dike No. 4. The Guadalupe Creek Diversion Dikes, located off - site on the northern end of the Project property, are also designed to convey flows to Dike No. 4. The CVWD groundwater percolation ponds are presently protected from off -site drainage by a combination of earthen berms, rock lining, and concrete channelization. In order to determine the existing drainage environment and design the flood control system for the proposed Project, a Project -specific Drainage Master Plan (DMP) was prepared by Q3 Consulting (March 2023) (Draft EIR Appendix J.3). The DMP outlines a detailed watershed assessment, including regional and local hydrology, flood hazard analysis, hydraulics and sedimentation for the Project site. The overall on -site grading and drainage pattern of the Project will continue to emulate existing topography. Project stormwater runoff will be intercepted at and carried along the private street curb and gutter conveyances to multiple catch basins connected to a network of storm drain lines sized to confluence and outlet into the respective detention/infiltration basin (A and B). The outlet points in the basins will include rip -rap treatment as a form of energy dissipation to slow flows and reduce erosion to facilities. To address off -site drainage conditions that interface with and currently pass through the Project site, the proposed improvements include a series of engineered and fortified embankments and channels. The design of this system is identified in detail as a flood protection system in the DMP, which calls for flood control barriers to direct off -site ephemeral drainage in a northerly and easterly direction respectively as it interfaces with the western and southern edges of the Project. Electrical Facilities: The project site is located within the Imperial Irrigation District (IID) service area for electric service. Existing distribution power poles are located on Avenue 62 and extend approximately 0.64 miles onto the Project property. The power poles continue along Avenue 62 to the Monroe intersection where the above -ground poles extend one -mile north to the Avenue 60 intersection. It is likely that these distribution power poles were installed with operation of the vineyard. The distribution poles onsite are along the unpaved Avenue 62 alignment and will be 84 542 undergrounded during development of the Avenue 62 extension onto the Project property. In order to obtain electricity service from IID, it is anticipated that the Project will be required to contribute to the construction of an off -site substation which will serve the substation's regional limits and the Project (Draft EIR, pg. 4.18-20). ii. Mitigation Measures: To avoid or substantially reduce potential adverse effects associated with on- or off -site erosion or siltation or impediments to or redirection of flood flows as a result of the Project, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: HWQ-1 The Operations and Maintenance (O&M) plan shall include provisions to monitor and remove sediment along the west bank to maintain the required conveyance and freeboard conditions. Other aspects of the bank maintenance shall be identified based on the final design configuration of the systems. A Flood Control Facilities Operations and Maintenance Manual for the proposed improvements shall be prepared and submitted to CVWD for review and approval. The manual shall meet the requirements of Section 5.8.9 of the Development Design Manual. To mitigate potential impacts concerning impacts to the visual character of the offsite substation, the following mitigation measures are hereby adopted and will be implemented consistent with the MMRP: AES-1 In order to reduce the proposed substation's impact on the existing visual character and reduce the potential degradation of scenic quality of the surrounding area, the Project applicant shall use one or more of the following or comparable techniques: perimeter barriers, landscaping appropriate for the substation facility. Additionally, glare shall be controlled through the use of non -reflective surfaces, dulling finishes to help blend the structures with the surroundings and reduce glare and color contrast, or comparable methods subject to the approval of IID. iii. Finding Related to Impacts of New Drainage and Electrical Utility Infrastructure: The City Council finds that, for the potentially significant effects of utility infrastructure, further discussed in the Draft/Final EIR and herein, changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which avoid or substantially lessen such significant environmental effect as identified in the Final EIR, and the City Council further finds that all such effects will be mitigated to less than significant levels through implementation of Mitigation Measures HWQ-1 and AES-1, which have been adopted by the City and are enforceable through the MMRP, Development Agreement, and project conditions of approval. 85 543 Facts in Support of Finding: The proposed Project and associated flood control improvements will result in a potential redirection of the off -site flow path, resulting in foreseeable sediment deposition along the west bank of the Project site. Therefore, off -site siltation impacts are potentially significant and Mitigation Measure HWQ-1 would be implemented to monitor and maintain the west bank to the required conveyance and freeboard conditions. With the proposed flood control improvements, design sequence in the Project Design Features, and Mitigation Measure HWQ-1, designed to account for runoff conveyance around the Project while taking into consideration the natural erosion and deposition process associated with the active alluvial fan, less than significant impacts are expected pertaining to substantial erosion or siltation, on- or off -site. Substation facilities include transmission poles and electric lines that are visually noticeable, especially in a rural context where development does not camouflage facilities. (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-52). The proposed substation would be located within a rural context within the City that is characterized by agricultural and vacant lots. Transmission and distribution lines are typically located adjacent to the public roadways. The new substation may result in a visual change to the existing visual character of the rural portion of the City. However, the new substation will be required to comply with setback requirements for utility infrastructure and design features, such as landscaping and materials used, reduces the impact of the utilities to less than significant levels regarding their impact to scenic vistas and the surrounding visual character. For example, the use of exposed metal which can be shiny, and block wall perimeters and decorative landscaping along the substation frontage would reduce visual impacts of the utility field. Although electrical substations consist of elements that are noticeable within a rural context, the potential impact of the substations can be reduced to less than significant levels with the close coordination with IID to ensure that impacts are avoided and minimized to the greatest degree practicable by proposing more subtle materials used, perimeter barriers, and landscaping. As stated above, the development of the off -site utility field, specifically the substation, would include visually noticeable in a rural context (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-52). Typically, substation facilities include lighting arresters, conductors, insulators, instrument transformers, electrical power transformers, relays, circuit breakers, bus bars, etc. Substation facilities include large transmission poles and electric lines that are visually noticeable, especially in a rural context where development does not camouflage facilities. Transmission and distribution lines are typically located adjacent to the public roadways. The distribution lines extending from the proposed substation will be installed underground within existing rights -of -way. Transmission lines will be above ground and connect the new substation to existing facilities. The new substation would result in a visual change to the existing visual character of the rural portion of the City. However, the new substation will be required to comply with setback requirements for utility infrastructure and design features, such as landscaping and materials used, reduces the impact of the utilities to less than significant levels regarding their impact to scenic vistas and the surrounding visual character. For example, the use of exposed metal which can be shiny, and block wall perimeters and decorative landscaping along the substation frontage would reduce visual impacts of the utility field. In addition, Mitigation Measure AES-1 identified above will be implemented and will further reduce potential impacts to the impact of substations in rural areas, which avoid any significant effects (Draft EIR at p. 4.1-53). 86 544 VI. FINDINGS REGARDING IMPACTS DETERMINED TO BE LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT The Final EIR also determined, based upon substantial evidence in the record, the following impacts associated with the project are less than significant and no mitigation is required. The City hereby adopts the findings, analysis, and conclusions regarding these potential impacts set forth in the Final EIR, and incorporates the same herein by this reference. A. AESTHETICS. i. Effects on a Scenic Vista: The Santa Rosa Mountains, Coral Mountain, and Martinez Rockslide provide scenic vistas in the southern portion of La Quinta, where the Project is located. Views of these scenic vistas are typically observed from public rights -of -way. The Draft EIR analyzed the Project's potential impacts to scenic vistas in the area, via visual simulations generated from public rights -of -way surrounding the project, as well as within the Trilogy Golf Course Community. See Exhibits 4.1- 7 through 4.1-19 in the Draft EIR for the visual simulations. ii. Finding Regarding Scenic Vistas: The City Council finds that the project fits with the low density residential and golf course community character of this portion of the City, and through compliance with the design guidelines in the Specific Plan and the applicable City requirements, the proj ect's effects relating to the scenic vistas will be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. Facts in Support of Finding: The findings of the analysis determined that the Project would not result in significant impacts to the scenic vistas due to the Project's location behind Dike No. 4. From the surrounding rights -of - way northeast and east of the Project, the Project development will not be visible. However, from rights -of -way northwest and trails west of the Project would be able to see the Project, but development would not result in significant obstructions to the scenic vistas due to their massing and scale. From some locations at Trilogy (i.e., Location 5 through 9), the Project roads (i.e., the westerly extension of Avenue 62, and southerly extension of Madison Street) are visible. However, as determined in the Draft EIR, the Project impacts would be less than significant due to the massing and scale of the mountains. iii. Scenic Resources within a State Scenic Highway: The State Scenic Highway Program preserves and protects scenic State highway corridors from changes which would diminish the aesthetic value of lands adjacent to highways. Existing qualified scenic State highways in the Coachella Valley include Route 62 and Highway 111 from Bombay Beach in Salton Sea State Park to Route 195 near Mecca and from Route 74 (near Palm Desert) to Interstate 10 (near Whitewater) are both eligible scenic highways but are not "officially designated." 87 545 iv. Finding Regarding Scenic Resources within a State Scenic Highway: The City Council finds that the project is not located near a State, County, or City designated scenic highway. Thus, the Project's effects relating to the scenic resources will be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. Facts in Support of Finding: Existing qualified scenic State highways in the Coachella Valley include Route 62 and Highway 111 from Bombay Beach in Salton Sea State Park to Route 195 near Mecca and from Route 74 (near Palm Desert) to Interstate 10 (near Whitewater) are both eligible scenic highways but are not "officially designated." There are no State or locally designated scenic highways in the vicinity of the Project property, accordingly the Project will not result in potentially significant impacts to scenic highways. B. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. i. Convert Prime, Unique, or Statewide Importance Farmland to Non - Agricultural Use or Involve other Changes that could Result in Conversion of Farmland to Non -Agricultural Use: Nearly a quarter of the approximately 855-acre Project property is within an area designated as Unique Farmland (Draft EIR Exhibit 4.2-1). This area is characterized by the remnants of a cultivated vineyard, which has been abandoned since 2007. Development of the Project property would convert Unique Farmland or farmland into non-agricultural uses. ii. Conflict with Existing Zoning for Agricultural Use or Williamson Act Contract: The Project property is not located within or near lands designated under the Williamson Act for prime farmland resources. Moreover, the Project property is currently zoned Low Density Residential (RL), Medium High Density Residential (RMH), Neighborhood Commercial (CN), Tourist Commercial (CT), Golf Course (GC), and Open Space (OS). Zoning for agricultural use does not occur within the Project boundaries. iii. Conflict with Zoning for Forest Land, Timberland, or Timberland Production or Result in Loss of Forest Land or Conversion of Forest Land to Non -Forest Use: The City of La Quinta does not have any existing zoning ordinances that pertain to forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. The City of La Quinta has no existing land designated as forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. Additionally, Project implementation would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use because forest land does not occur on the Project site or within the City of La Quinta. 88 546 iv. Findings Regarding Conversion of Agricultural Lands to Non -Agricultural Uses, Conflicts with Existing Zoning for Agricultural Use or Williamson Act Contract, or Conflicts with Existing Zoning for Forest Land, Timberland, Timberland Production, or Convert a Forest Use to Non -Forest Uses: The City Council finds that the Project will not convert prime, unique, or statewide importance farmland to non-agricultural use; result in the conversion of farmland to non-agricultural uses; conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use or Williamson Act Contract; conflict with zoning for forest land, timberland, or timberland production; or result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Impacts will be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. Facts in Support of Finding: Development of the Project property would convert Unique Farmland into non-agricultural uses. To assess the level of impact, the Project property was analyzed under the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment (LESA). The LESA Report (Appendix B.1 and B.2 in the Draft EIR) studied the soil types, project size, availability of water resources, and the presence of surrounding agricultural land, based on a scoring system. The LESA analysis determined that the Project would not have a significant impact on lands designated Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance. The Project property is not located within or near lands designated under the Williamson Act for prime farmland resources. Therefore, there would be no impacts as a result of development of the Project. The City of La Quinta does not have any existing zoning ordinances that pertain to forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. Therefore, implementation of the proposed Project would not conflict with existing zoning, or cause rezoning of forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production. Additionally, Project implementation would not result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non -forest use. Therefore, there would be no impacts. The project proposes the development of five off -site well sites and a substation. The exact locations of the off -site utility field facilities has not been determined; however, based upon consultations with the local water and power providers (CVWD and IID) they are proposed to be located east of the Project site and Dike No. 4, within a 2-mile radius. According to the California FMMP, a majority of the land within a 2-mile radius is considered Urban and Built -Up Land (approximately 34 percent). Other Land occupies approximately 28.7 percent of the potential off - site utility field area. Farmland of Local Importance and Prime Farmland comprise of approximately 18.6 percent and 16.2 percent of the off -site area, respectively. According to the Riverside County 2014-2016 Land Use Conversion, provided by the California Department of Conservation, approximately 118,077 acres of Prime Farmland was recorded in 2014. In 2016, approximately 117,484 acres of Prime Farmland was inventoried in Riverside County. Between 2014 and 2016, approximately 593 acres (or approximately 0.5 percent) of Prime Farmland in Riverside County was converted to different uses. The development of the wells and substation will be constructed in compliance with CVWD and IID standards regarding their facilities. Project- 89 547 level environmental review of the wells and substation will be conducted by CVWD and IID, respectively, in their roles as responsible agencies, and once site -specific locations of the infrastructure are available. Off -site parcels are located within Riverside County's light agricultural zone (A-1). A-1 zones allow public utility facilities with a plot plan approval. The plot plan approval may include conditions requiring fencing and landscaping of the parcel to assure that the use is compatible with the surrounding area. Additionally, the off -site utility field is not located in Williamson Act Contracted Lands. Impacts are less than significant. The 2-mile radius where the off -site utility field is proposed not include existing land designated as forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production by the City of La Quinta or Riverside County. Therefore, implementation of the proposed off -site utility field would not conflict with existing zoning, or cause rezoning of forest land, timberland or timberland zoned Timberland Production. C. AIR QUALITY. i. Expose Sensitive Receptors to Substantial Pollutant Concentrations: The analysis makes use of methodology included in the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology). The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the NAAQS and CAAQS. Collectively, these are referred to as LSTs. LSTs were developed in response to environmental justice and health concerns regarding exposure of individuals to criteria pollutants in local communities. To address the issue of localized significance, the SCAQMD adopted LSTs that show whether a Project would cause or contribute to localized air quality impacts and thereby cause or contribute to potential localized adverse health effects. ii. Result in Other Emissions (i.e., objectionable odors): The project does not include any of the land uses generally associated with odor complaints; the residential, open space, and resort uses associated with the project are not expected to operate in a manner resulting in other emissions leading to objectionable odors. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities and the temporary storage of typical solid waste (refuse) associated with the proposed project's (long-term operational) uses. iii. Findings Regarding Localized Air Quality Impacts and Odors: The City Council finds that the Project will not result expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations, and accordingly, impacts will be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. The City Council further finds that the project's odor related impacts will be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. The City Council further finds that the Project will not have any new or substantially more severe impacts than analyzed and disclosed in the Draft EIR. 90 548 Facts in Support of Finding: The analysis makes use of methodology included in the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology). The SCAQMD has established that impacts to air quality are significant if there is a potential to contribute or cause localized exceedances of the NAAQS and CAAQS. Collectively, these are referred to as LSTs. Due to the phased nature of the Project development, future phases have the potential to generate construction impacts to previous phases of development. Phase 2 building construction activities will impact the on -site receptors planned in Phase 1. To assess the potential Phase 2 building construction activity and consistent with prescribed methods, a 25-meter distance will be used for evaluation of localized PM10, PM2.5, NO2, and CO. Similarly, Phase 3 building construction activities will impact the on -site receptors planned in Phases 1 and 2. To assess the potential Phase 3 building construction activity, a 25-meter distance was also used for evaluation of localized PM 10, PM2.5, NO2, and CO. Without mitigation, localized construction emissions would not exceed the applicable SCAQMD LSTs for emissions of any criteria pollutant during the full range of Project construction activities. Given that the estimated emission levels for all Project activities are below the applicable thresholds, the implementation of off -site construction activities taking place at the utility fields and off -site locations of street improvements is similarly not expected to result in localized emission exceedances. All on- and off -site construction activities will be subject to the City's fugitive dust control standards, which further ensures that LST impacts associated with particulate matter will be less than significant. According to SCAQMD LST methodology, LSTs would apply to the operational phase of a proposed Project if the Project includes stationary sources or attracts mobile sources that may spend long periods queuing and idling at the site (e.g., transfer facilities and warehouse buildings). The proposed Project does not include uses that could generate significant stationary source emissions; therefore, no long-term localized significance threshold analysis is required. The Project does not contain nor is located in proximity to land uses typically associated with emitting objectionable odors or other noxious emissions. Potential odor sources associated with the proposed Project may result from construction equipment exhaust and the application of asphalt and architectural coatings during construction activities, and the temporary storage of typical solid waste (refuse) or surface water management associated with the proposed Project's (long-term operational) uses. Standard construction requirements would minimize odor impacts from construction. The construction odor emissions would be temporary, short-term, and intermittent in nature and would cease upon completion of the respective phase of construction. Therefore, potential impacts associated with construction -related odor and other noxious emissions will be less than significant. Potential operational emissions of or exposures to sources of odor or noxious emissions are also expected to be less than significant. Commercial and residential refuse will be stored in covered containers and removed at regular intervals in compliance with the City's solid waste regulations. The proposed Project will also be required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 402 to prevent occurrences of public nuisances. On -site water features are expected be maintained properly. 91 549 Nearby groundwater recharge basins are designed to percolate water into the subsurface basin as quickly as possible and standing water is not an issue with these facilities. Therefore, odors or other noxious emissions associated with the proposed Project construction and operations will be less than significant and no mitigation is required. D. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. i. Substantial Adverse Effect on Federally Protected Wetlands: The Draft EIR addresses effects on federally protected wetlands at page 4.4-43 of the Draft EIR. Evidence of an OHWM was noted within the boundaries of the Project site. However, although an OHWM is present, aquatic features within the Project site are considered ephemeral and do not meet the definition of a Waters of the US pursuant to the latest USACE guidelines established in 2015 for mapping of Water of the US, including wetlands. ii. Interfere Substantially with the Movement of Any Native Resident or Migratory Fish or Wildlife Species or Wildlife Corridors: The Draft EIR addresses effects on wildlife movement at page 4.4-44 of the Draft EIR, as well as in responses to comments received on the Draft EIR. Land uses surrounding the Project site to the south and west consist primarily of vacant land that transitions to the Martinez Rockslide and the Santa Rosa Mountains. Vacant land under the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) occurs along the western border and the existing CVWD, Thomas E. Levy Groundwater Replenishment Facility and residential development occurs along the northeast border of the Project site. Wildlife movement potentially occurs within the open SRSJM Conservation Area to the south and west of the Project site. iii. Conflict with Local Policies or Ordinances Protecting Biological Resources: The Draft EIR addresses Project consistency with local policies and ordinances protecting biological resources at page 4.4-44 of the Draft EIR. The proposed Project and the off -site utility field will be developed in accordance with local, State, and federal biological resource plans and policies, including those associated with the BLM California Desert Conservation Plan, the multi - agency PBS Recovery Plan and the CVMSHCP. The City of La Quinta does not have a tree preservation policy or ordinance and relies on the CVMSHCP. iv. Conflict with the Provisions of an Adopted Habitat Conservation Plan: The Draft EIR addresses Project consistency with the CVMSHCP at page 4.4-44 of the Draft EIR. The Project, and the off -site utility field area, are located within the Plan boundaries of the CVMSHCP and are subject to its provisions. The CVMSHCP identifies the Travertine Specific Plan as a "Covered Activity". The majority of the Project footprint is located outside of the adjacent CVMSHCP Conservation Area. However, approximately 36.89 acres of the Project footprint are within the Conservation Area, including 15.65 acres associated with the proposed water tank facility (6.40 acres of permanent impacts and 9.25 acre of remedial grading), 9.52 acres associated with the Jefferson Street extension, 6.81 acres associated with the improvements to the 92 550 existing Guadalupe Dike, 4.41 acres associated with offsite flood protection along the western edge of the Project, and 0.45 acre associated with a proposed trail. V. Findings Regarding Federally Protected Wetlands, the Movement of Any Native Resident or Migratory Fish or Wildlife Species or Wildlife Corridors, Local Policies or Ordinances Protecting Biological Resources, and an Adopted Habitat Conservation Plan: The City Council finds that the Project will not result in impacts to federally protected wetlands, and therefore, impacts will be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. The City Council further finds that the Project will not interfere substantially with wildlife movement and therefore impacts are less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. The City Council further finds that the Project will not conflict with local policies or ordinances adopted to protect biological resources or any adopted habitat conservation plan, and therefore impacts are less than significant. Facts in Support of Finding: As discussed at page 4.4-43 of the Draft EIR, aquatic features within the Project site are considered ephemeral and do not meet the definition of Waters of the US. Therefore, onsite aquatic features would not be subject to regulation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and would not fall under USACE jurisdiction. The proposed Project does not contain any state or federally protected wetlands and will not result in any impacts to this resource. Further, the aquatic features potentially extant within the off -site utility field are not expected to have a connection to interstate commerce via relatively permanent waters or traditional navigable waters and are therefore not anticipated to be jurisdictional pursuant to section 404 of the Clean Water Act. As discussed at page 4.4-44 of the Draft EIR, land uses surrounding the Project site to the south and west consist primarily of vacant land that transitions to the Martinez Rockslide and the Santa Rosa Mountains. Vacant land under the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) occurs along the western border and the existing CVWD, Thomas E. Levy Groundwater Replenishment facility and residential development occurs along the northeast border of the Project site. Any wildlife currently utilizing the Project site and adjacent areas of dispersal and movement are likely adapted to disturbances associated with such environments. Wildlife movement especially PBS, potentially occurs within the open space SRSJM Conservation Area to the south and west of the Project site. Conservation and protections of these areas would continue to provide opportunities for local wildlife movement and function as a corridor for PBS and other highly mobile wildlife species. Therefore, less than significant impacts are expected to corridor movement. The City of La Quinta does not have a tree preservation policy or ordinance and relies on the CVMSHCP. As discussed at page 4.4-44 of the Draft EIR, the project has been determined through the MSHCP Joint Project Review to be consistent with the MSHCP. 93 551 E. ENERGY. i. Consumption of Energy Resources: The Project involves construction activities and will consume energy resources, primarily in the form of petroleum, natural gas, and electricity. However, there are no unusual project characteristics or construction processes that would require the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable construction activities, or that would violate current emissions standards (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.5-12 — 4.5-17), and therefore, construction -related impacts would be less than significant. The project would increase demand for energy In the project area, including electricity, natural gas, and petroleum, and is located within the service areas of (Imperial Irrigation District) IID and SoCal Gas Company. ii. Consistency with a State or Local Plan for Renewable Energy or Energy Efficiency: The Project is subject to CALGreen Building Codes and Title 24 codes and standards for both residential and nonresidential components of the project, as well as the City of La Quinta's GHG Reduction Plan and General Plan goals and policies for reducing energy consumption. As a result, the project is required to incorporate energy efficient design features that result in substantial reductions in energy consumption and GHG emissions, including the measures described below and in the Draft EIR. The proposed Project would incorporate several project design features (PDFs) directed at minimizing energy use, such as the implementation of a Project -specific Water Conservation Strategy to reduce water demands and associated energy use. In addition to the PDFs, the Project will also be required to implement standards required by the California Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24 of CCR), and Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 20 of CCR). These standards require high efficiency lighting, applying energy efficient design building shells and building components, such as windows, roof systems, electrical lighting systems, and heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems to meet Building Code standards in effect at the time development occurs. Title 24 standards also require solar systems for new homes. The project would also install water -efficient plumbing fixtures and irrigation systems, LED technology, drought -tolerant plants in landscaping. iii. Findings Regarding Energy Resources Impacts and Consistency with State or Local Plans for Renewable Energy or Energy Efficiency: The City Council finds that compliance with existing state, regional, and City regulations, plans, and programs, in addition to the incorporation of project design features identified above and in the Draft EIR, would ensure that the Project is consistent with all applicable state and local plans for energy efficiency and that consumption of energy resources would not be wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary, and therefore, project impacts related to energy resources will be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. The City Council further finds that the Project 94 552 will not have any new or substantially more severe impacts than analyzed and disclosed in the Draft EIR. Facts in Support of Finding: Project construction and operation will not result in significant impacts due to wasteful, inefficient, or unnecessary consumption of energy resources during project construction or operation because the Project is consistent with CALGreen Building Codes and Title 24 codes and standards for both residential and nonresidential components of the project, as well as the City of La Quinta's GHG Reduction Plan and General Plan goals and policies for reducing energy consumption (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.6-17 — 4.6-21). The project would not result in wasteful, inefficient or unnecessary consumption of energy during construction. The estimated construction -related electricity usage represents approximately 1.71 percent of the Project's estimated annual operational demand. IID estimates that electricity consumption within IID's planning area will be approximately 4,641,267 MWh annually by 2031. Based on the Project's estimated electrical demand of 191,088.1 kWh over the course of nine years of Project construction, the Project construction would cumulatively account for less than approximately 0.004 percent of IID's total estimated demand in 2031 (Draft EIR pg. 4.6-12). In addition, the Project is consistent with EPA/CARB Tier 4 emission standards, and CARB's 2022 Plan for achieving carbon neutrality. The Project is required to operate off -road diesel construction equipment rated at 50 horsepower (hp) or greater in compliance with EPA/CARB Tier 4 off -road emissions standards or equivalent, during all construction activities (Mitigation Measure AQ-1). The project proposes a mixed -use development that provides complementary uses with an emphasis on connectivity and alternative modes of transportation to reduce vehicle use within the project. Operation of the Project would generate an annual demand for approximately 11,144,490 kWh at build -out accounting for energy -reducing project design features described below (see Table 5 in Appendix F of Draft EIR). The LQGP EIR predicts that buildout of residential and commercial uses in the General Plan, including the proposed Project property, will result in electrical consumption of 1,088,371,637.12 kWh per year. Residential uses will account for 530,867,194 kWh/year of this amount, while commercial uses will consume 557,504,443.12 kWh/year. As indicated in the table below, the proposed Project is anticipated to consume approximately 12,987,903 kWh/year, which is approximately 1.2 percent of the City's electrical consumption at total build -out. The IID delivered approximately 3,678.63 gigawatt hours (GWh) of electricity to its service area in 2020. IID estimates that electricity consumption within IID's service area will be approximately 4,641.27 GWh annually by 2031. Based on the proposed Project's estimated annual electrical demand of 12,987,903 kWh (or 12.9879 GWh), the Project would account for approximately 0.28 percent of IID's total estimated demand in 2031. Project operations natural gas consumption will be primarily from building space heating, water heating, and cooking. At buildout the Project is estimated to consume approximately 41,923,277.7 cubic feet or 43,474,439 kBTU of natural gas annually (see Table 6 in Appendix F of Draft EIR). According to the LQGP EIR, at General Plan build -out, the aggregate of City residential units will use approximately 919,426,079 cubic feet of natural gas per year (cf/year). For City-wide 95 553 commercial uses, consumption will be approximately 512,618,978.28 cf/year. At buildout, all combined City land uses are expected to consume approximately 1,432,045,057.28 cubic feet per year. This number is equivalent to 1,485,030,724.4 kBTU. The Project is anticipated to consume approximately 43,474,439 kBTU/year, which is approximately 2.9 percent of the City's natural gas consumption at buildout of the City. Based on the 2018 California Gas Report, the California Gas and Electric Utility providers in the State estimate natural gas consumption within SoCalGas's planning area will be approximately 2,310 million cf per day in 2030. The Project would consume approximately 0.0034 percent of the 2030 forecasted consumption in SoCalGas's planning area. Although the Project would result in a long-term increase in demand for natural gas, the Project would be designed to comply with Title 24, Part 6 of the CCR regarding energy consumption. As a part of the project design features to reduce energy consumption, the Project will install appliances with the highest energy efficiency practicable. The implementation of the project design features listed throughout this Energy Resources section and Chapter 3.0, Project Description, will be included as an enforceable provision in the Development Agreement, and will reduce the amount of natural gas consumed during project operation. Therefore, impacts will be less than significant without mitigation. Impacts would be less than significant. The Project will also comply with some of the current transportation sector policies (through vehicle manufacturer compliance) in the 2022 Scoping Plan, including: Advanced Clean Cars II, Advanced Clean Trucks, Advanced Clean Fleets, Zero Emission Forklifts, the Off -Road Zero - Emission Targeted Manufacturer rule, Clean Off -Road Fleet Recognition Program, In -use Off - Road Diesel -Fueled Fleets Regulation, Off -Road Zero -Emission Targeted Manufacturer rule, Clean Off -Road Fleet Recognition Program, Amendments to the In -use Off -Road Diesel -Fueled Fleets Regulation, carbon pricing through the Cap -and -Trade Program, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Further, the Project will include design features related to water conservation. Lastly, the Project would be required to comply with applicable elements outlined in the County's CAP. As such, the Project would not obstruct the any State plan for renewable energy or energy efficiency. F. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. i. Direct or Indirect Effects Involving Soil Rupture: The San Andreas and San Jacinto fault zones are located approximately 10 miles northeast and 14.8 miles southwest of the Project property, respectively. No major active faults are mapped onsite or in the vicinity of the property. ii. Soils Incompatible to Support Septic Tanks or Alternative Waste Water Disposal: The Project does not include septic tanks or alternative water disposal systems. CVWD provides the City of La Quinta and the project vicinity with sewerage collection and treatment services. 96 554 iii. Findings Regarding Soil Rupture and Soils Impacts of Septic Tanks and Waste Water Disposal: The City Council finds that compliance with existing state, regional, and City regulations, plans, and programs will avoid significant risks from seismic induced rupture, or provide soils incompatible to support a septic system or alternative waste water disposal, and these geology and soils impacts would be less than significant. Facts in Support of Finding: The Project property does not lie within a currently delineated State of California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The geotechnical investigation performed for this Project indicates that there are no active faults or areas of potential ground rupture at or in the vicinity of the property. Therefore, there will be no impact associated with fault rupture on -site. The Project does not include septic tanks or alternative water disposal systems. CVWD provides the City of La Quinta and the project vicinity with sewerage collection and treatment services. The Project proposes to extend existing CVWD sewer mains along Avenue 62 and Jefferson Street to the Project property. G. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. i. Emit Hazardous Emissions or Materials within One -Quarter Mile of a School: Under CEQA Guideline 15186, additional notification and consultation requirements may apply to projects with one -quarter mile of an existing school facility. The Project site is not located within 1/4 mile of an existing or proposed school. ii. Located within an Airport Land Use Plan: The Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport is located at 56-850 Higgins Drive in Thermal, California approximately 5.4 miles northeast of the future Avenue 62 entrance to the project site, and approximately 6 miles northeast of the future Jefferson Street entrance to the project site. iii. Effect on an Emergency Response Plan: There is currently no paved public access to the Project property. An unpaved road exists from the north which in the future will be the extension of Jefferson Street. On the east, Avenue 62 stops at the toe of Dike No. 4. Future access would be provided by the extension of Avenue 62 across the Dike and the impoundment area and onto the site to connect to Jefferson Street. A project -specific Fire Master Plan was completed for the Project to determine the level of service and ensure emergency response would be available at the Project property during the development of the first 600 residential units. 97 555 iv. Risk of Wildfires: According to CAL FIRE's Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map, the Project does not lie in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ). The southern and southeastern sides of the property, however, abuts areas designated as "Moderate" FHSZ (see Exhibit 4.9-1 in Draft EIR). V. Finding Regarding Hazardous Emissions Near Schools, Airports, Effects on Emergency Response Plans, and Risk of Wildfire: The City Council finds that compliance with existing federal, state, regional, and City regulations will ensure impacts related to schools located within a quarter mile of the Project, and the Project's construction and operations, including the potential effects on emergency response plans, and the risk of wildfires will be less than significant. Facts in Support of Finding: The Project site is not located within'/4 mile of an existing or proposed school. The nearest school to the project site is the Westside Elementary School located at 82225 Airport Boulevard in Thermal, approximately 2.7 miles northeast of the Project site. Offsite improvements include the construction and operation of a 2.5-acre substation within a 2-mile radius of the Project site's northern and northeastern boundaries and the development of up to five wells in a utility field area. The substation is proposed in vacant lots south of Avenue 58, which lies over 1/4 mile from the closest existing school (Westside Elementary School, approximately 0.30 miles from utility field area). Therefore, the Project's proposed onsite and offsite improvements will have no impact on schools as it relates to hazardous materials. Project -level environmental review of the wells and substation will be conducted by CVWD and IID, respectively, in their roles as CEQA lead agencies, and once site -specific locations of the infrastructure is available. The Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport is located at 56-850 Higgins Drive in Thermal, California approximately 5.4 miles northeast of the future Avenue 62 entrance to the project site, and approximately 6 miles northeast of the future Jefferson Street entrance to the project site. The Project site is outside the Airport Land Use Compatibility Zone. The offsite improvements are proposed to be located more than 2 miles west of the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport. Therefore, the site's location in relation to the airport indicates that the Project will not be impacted by an airport -related safety hazard or excessive noise that could impact Project residents, employees or visitors to the project. The Project property is located in a relatively isolated area surrounded on the west and south by the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area; on the east by agricultural land and residential communities, and on the north and northeast by the CVWD Dike No. 4 impoundment area and Coral Mountain. North and northeast of this area are residential communities, vacant parcels that are designated for residential use, and Lake Cahuilla. There is currently no paved public access to the Project property. An unpaved road exists from the north which in the future will be the extension of Jefferson Street. On the east, Avenue 62 stops at the toe of Dike No. 4. Future access would be provided by the extension of Avenue 62 across the Dike and the impoundment area and onto the site to connect to Jefferson Street. A project -specific Fire Master Plan was completed for the Project to determine the level of service and ensure emergency 98 556 response would be available at the Project property during the development of the first 600 residential units. The Project's consistency with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan is discussed in detail in Section 4.19, Wildfire, in the Draft EIR. Impacts were determined to be less than significant. Please consult Section 4.19 for further discussion of project impacts on emergency response and evacuation plans. According to the City of La Quinta's Emergency Services Division Emergency Operations Plan (EOP), a wildfire as an uncontrolled fire spreading through vegetative fuels and damaging or possibly destroying structures. Areas where wildfires could impact communities include Wildland Urban Interface (WUI) areas, which includes the line, area, or zone where structures and other human development meet or intermingle with undeveloped wildland and vegetation fuels. Proximity of new neighborhoods to wildland areas, coupled with the prolonged drought conditions the Coachella Valley has experienced in recent years that has resulted in excessively dry vegetation, increases the risk of wildfires. The Project site is located in the southern portion of the City. According to CAL FIRE'S Fire Hazard Severity Zones Map, the Project does not lie in a Fire Hazard Severity Zone (FHSZ). The southern and southeastern sides of the property, however, abuts areas designated as "Moderate" FHSZ (see Exhibit 4.9-1 below). Section 4.19, Wildfires, further analyzes the potential impact of wildfires to the Project site. The potential for wildfire threats to impact people and structures was determined to be less than significant. H. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. i. Compliance with Water Quality Standards or Waste Discharge Requirements: During construction and operation (life of the project), implementation of the proposed development will be required to comply with CWA, NPDES, state, and local regulations to prevent violations or impacts to surface water quality standards and waste discharge requirements pertinent to surface or ground water quality. These requirements include development and implementation of a project -specific storm water pollution prevention plan (SWPPP) and compliance with NPDES General Permit, Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ, as amended by 2010-00014-DWQ and 2012-006- DWQ, during all construction activities (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.10-20). The project is also required to develop and implement a project -specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) and to comply with the NPDES Order No. R7-2013-0011 (Waste Discharge Requirements for Discharges from the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) within the Whitewater River Watershed) during long-term operations (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.10-21 — 4.10-22). ii. Effect on Groundwater Supplies or Interference with Groundwater Recharge: The Project will rely on groundwater resources as a source of domestic and construction water supplies. The Project also has the potential to alter existing drainage and infiltration and groundwater quality. A Water Supply Assessment and Water Supply Verification (WSA/WSV) for Travertine Specific Plan was prepared for and approved by CVWD on June 16, 2021, with an approved revision on March 13, 2018 that is valid through June 24, 2026. The Project's total water demand is projected to be 867.47 AFY, per the WSA/WSV (Draft EIR pg. 4.10-24). 99 557 The project includes a storm drain system allowing project runoff to be intercepted and conveyed along engineered storm drain lines toward a system of on -site detention and retention basins, sized to meet the City's hydrologic requirements and water quality objectives under a required WQMP. The storm drain and basin system will be privately operated, monitored and maintained during the life of the project per a required WQMP agreement to be entered between the project proponent and the City. In doing so, the project's on -site infrastructure will be managed in perpetuity to prevent the discharge of untreated runoff. The proposed storm drain and retention infrastructure will be consistent with Chapter 13.24.120 (Drainage) of the La Quinta Municipal Code and with the City's Engineering Bulletin #06-16 (Hydrology and Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems), requiring on -site retention/detention basins and other necessary stormwater management facilities that are capable of managing the 100-year stormwater flows. The project site is located west of the CVWD Thomas Levy Groundwater Replenishment Facility and the US Bureau of Reclamation Dike No. 4. Based on the CVWD web site, the Groundwater Replenishment Facility was completed in 2009. This system is hydrologically separated from stormwater surface drainage patterns conveyed to the retention system for Dike No. 4. The groundwater replenishment facilities are protected by a system of earthen berms, dikes, and concrete channels designed to convey drainage along the westerly and southerly facility limits toward Dike No. 4. As such, these flood control facilities establish a physical separation between the recharge ponds and the dike's retention areas. iii. Result in On- or Off -site Flooding: The proposed land uses will result in an increase in impervious land cover through the introduction of structures, hardscape and streets. The Project will incorporate private on -site infrastructure that will serve all developed portions of the subject property to intercept, convey, and detain stormwater runoff resulting from the project development and under the conditions of the design or controlling storm (24-hour, 100-year). The Drainage Master Plan prepared for the Project performed the hydrologic analysis necessary to determine the engineering controls to address the naturally occurring off -site alluvial fan drainage interfacing with the project. The proposed concept would primarily establish bank protection along the western and southern project edges to direct flows toward the receiving Dike No. 4 facilities. iv. Create Runoff Which Would Exceed the Capacity of Existing or Planned Stormwater Drainage Systems: Runoff from the incremental increases in runoff resulting from the conversion of undeveloped (pervious) to developed (impervious) land cover, will be intercepted, conveyed, and retained/detained on -site in accordance with the City's engineering requirements and following the City approval of the final engineering plans (grading, hydrology, street, storm drain, utilities). CVWD is responsible for the review and approval of offsite improvements. The on -site retention will result in minimal pretreated discharge as approved by CVWD and contribution of runoff quantities above those observed from the undeveloped setting will be minimal. The capture and retention of urban runoff, in accordance with the WQMP site design and source control measures, will prevent a contribution of additional sources of pollution. 100 558 V. Consistency with Water Quality Control Plan or Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan: As discussed above, the project is required to comply with the applicable water control plans during both construction and for the life of the project. The project's consistency with the applicable Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan is also discussed above. vi. Findings Regarding Compliance with Water Quality Standards, Effect on Groundwater Supplies and Recharge, Flooding, Runoff, and Consistency with Water Quality Control Plan and Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan: The City Council finds that the Project will not have any significant adverse effects relating to hydrology and water quality, including causing any violations of water quality standards or discharge requirements, effecting groundwater recharge or quality, resulting in on- or off -site flooding, creating runoff exceeding capacity of the drainage systems, or conflicting with any water control plan. In addition, the City Council finds that the project will not have any significant adverse effects on existing or future groundwater supplies, nor will it interfere with CVWD's ongoing groundwater recharge efforts. Finally, the City Council finds that the Project will not have any new or substantially more severe impacts than analyzed and disclosed in the Draft EIR. Facts Supporting Findings: Compliance with Water Oualitv Standards or Waste Discharge Reauirements During the construction phase compliance with water quality and waste discharge requirements will be achieved through the permit registration and coverage process under the NPDES General Permit identified above. This will require development and implementation of a project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) that includes a strategy of BMPs that prevent pollution from leaving the site (see Draft EIR, at p. 4.10-21). During the life of the project, the water quality standards and discharge requirements will be met through compliance with the NPDES permit identified above, including developing and implementing a project -specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) demonstrating site design and source controls that prevent pollutant runoff and meet 100 percent of the Low Impact Development (LID) Site Design requirements, including the use of retention basins on -site. Compliance with these established regulatory requirements will ensure that the Project will not violate any water quality or waste discharge requirements, and impacts will be less than significant. Effect on Groundwater Sunnlies or Interference with Groundwater Recharge The Project's total water demand is projected to be 867.47 AFY, per the WSA/WSV (Draft EIR pg. 4.10-24). Based on the information, analysis, and findings documented in the WSA/WSV with approval by CVWD, substantial evidence was produced to support a determination that there will be sufficient water supplies to meet the demands of the proposed project, and future demands of the project, plus all forecasted demands in the next 20 years. This is based on the volume of water available in the aquifer, CVWD's State Water Project and Colorado River contract supplies, water rights and other water supply contracts, and CVWD's commitment to eliminate overdraft and 101 559 reduce per capita water use in CVWD's service area. CVWD has committed sufficient resources to further implement utilization of imported water supplies, purchase of additional water supplies, water conservation, and source substitution. The project's storm drain and basin system will be privately operated, monitored and maintained during the life of the project per a required WQMP agreement to be entered between the project proponent and the City. In doing so, the project's on -site infrastructure will be managed in perpetuity to prevent the discharge of untreated runoff. The required non-structural and structural source control measures, including associated maintenance, will be applicable during the life of the project. The Project is therefore not expected to violate or interfere with the groundwater quality. Regarding ground water quality, less than significant impacts are anticipated. The proposed development will establish new flood protection embankments along the west and south project limits to convey off -site runoff in a similar pattern and direction as the existing improvements established to protect the recharge facilities. Off -site runoff will be conveyed northerly and easterly toward Dike No. 4. Meanwhile, on -site project runoff will be conveyed via storm drain lines to the on -site detention/retention basins. As a result of these infrastructure improvements designed to handle surface runoff and protect on- and off -site conditions, the project is not expected to result in a reduction or interference with the existing replenishment operations. Less than significant impacts are anticipated pertaining to interference with groundwater recharge. Result in On- or Off -Site Flooding The on -site storm drain system will be private and require proper operation and maintenance during the life of the project, as mandated by the governing covenants, conditions, and restrictions, and by the WQMP agreement that will be required of this project prior to issuance of a grading permit. As a result of the on -site storm drain infrastructure, the project will not result in an increase in the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner that would result in on -site flooding. The Drainage Master Plan found that the infrastructure improvements would result in minimal changes ("little to no impact") on the offsite volumes being conveyed along the banks toward the receiving system. Instead, the system would simply redirect the flows in a similar manner that the existing berms have been established to protect the agricultural fields or off -site groundwater replenishment facilities. As a result, the off -site improvements would not result in an increase in the surface runoff in a manner that would result in flooding on- or off -site. Less than significant impacts are anticipated. Create Runoff Which Would Exceed the Capacity of Existing or Planned Stormwater Drainage Systems Pertaining to runoff pollution, the on -site storm drain system's detention system will capture project area runoff in accordance with the Project specific Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), preventing uncontrolled release into any public MS4 facilities. Dike No. 4 will continue to protect properties to the east of the levee from impacts associated with water quality and quantity impacts. Therefore, the project will not result in stormwater runoff conditions which would burden the City's existing MS4 capacity, create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the 102 560 capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff. Therefore, the impact is less than significant. Consistency with Water Qualitv Control Plan or Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan The project proponent is required to implement a project -specific WQMP to comply with the most current standards of the Whitewater River Region Water Quality Management Plan for Urban Runoff, Whitewater River Watershed MS4 Permit. Moreover, the project's storm water retention facilities will ensure that urban runoff is recharged into the ground via infiltration. As discussed previously, the design of stormwater facilities will protect the CVWD recharge basins from intrusion of surface flows which can impact the functionality of the basins by introducing excess sedimentation or other contaminants. The WSA/WSV prepared for this project compiled sufficient evidence for approval by CVWD. The findings of this document determined that there will be sufficient water supplies to meet the demands of the proposed project, and future demands of the project, plus all forecasted demands in the next 20 years. Further discussion of domestic water is found in the Utilities and Public Services sections of this DEIR. As such, project implementation is not expected to conflict with the regional groundwater management strategies or with the Indio Subbasin Sustainable Groundwater Management Plan. Pertaining to conflicts with a water quality control plan or sustainable groundwater management plan, less than significant impacts are anticipated. I. LAND USE. i. Division of an Established Community: The majority of the Project property is currently vacant land, void of any physical structures. Man- made improvements are found on land adjacent to the Project property including the BOR/CVWD Dike No. 4 and CVWD groundwater recharge basins abutting the Project to the east. Golf course communities (Andalusia, Trilogy and PGA West) lie approximately one mile to the north and northeast. The remaining land surrounding the Project property is vacant. The closest established communities to the Project include Trilogy to the east and northeast, separated by Dike No. 4, and The Quarry at La Quinta to the northwest, separated by the Guadelupe Dike and vacant land. ii. Consistency with Any Land Use Plan, Policy or Regulation: The Project proposes development of a medium- and low -density residential community with golf academy, resort spa, 100 villas, and recreational amenities. The Project includes applications for technical amendments to the Zoning Map and General Plan to make modifications to allow the proposed uses. Project entitlements include a GPA and SPA. The approval of the General Plan Amendment and Specific Plan Amendment would modify the land use designations from Low Density Residential, Medium/High Density Residential, General Commercial, Tourist Commercial, Recreational Open Space, and Natural Open Space to Low Density Residential, Medium/High Density Residential, Tourist Commercial, Recreational Open Space, and Natural 103 561 Open Space. The Low Density Residential, Medium/High Density Residential, Tourist Commercial, Recreational Open Space, and Natural Open Space land uses proposed for the project are consistent with the current General Plan land use designations, and do not represent a substantial change to the character of the area as envisioned in the General Plan. A detailed analysis of applicable goals, policies and programs contained in the General Plan was conducted to determine the Project's consistency with the existing plan. Along with the GPA and ZC, the Project is requesting approval of a Specific Plan Amendment (SPA), a Tentative Tract Map (TTM), and Development Agreement (DA). The SPA is a land use planning document which, if adopted by the City of La Quinta, would serve as the site -specific zoning document for the Project. Specifically, the SPA provides for the distribution of land uses, location and sizing of supporting infrastructure, as well as development standards and regulations for uses within the Project property. The TTM subdivides the property into smaller lots for subsequent development into lots suitable for the development of the uses permitted for these areas under the SPA. The DA establishes an agreement between the developer and the City regarding the development of the Project property. The Draft EIR analyzed the land use consistencies of the proposed Project in relation to the City of La Quinta General Plan, the La Quinta Municipal Code, the existing 1995 Approved Specific Plan, the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, and the Southern California Association of Governments Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCAG RTP/SCS). See Appendix K of the Draft EIR for associated tables. iii. Findings Regarding Division of an Established Community and Land Use Plan, Policy and Regulation Consistency: The City Council hereby adopts and incorporates herein the findings, analysis and conclusions set forth in the Draft EIR, and further specifically finds that the project is consistent with the General Plan as to each and every of these chapters. The City Council also finds that the project Specific Plan Amendment will serve as the regulatory document providing the zoning requirements and restrictions for the project, and therefore, the project will be fully consistent with the applicable zoning. The City Council also specifically finds that the project is consistent with the character of the surrounding residential and golf course communities. Facts Supporting Findings: Implementation of the proposed Project would not physically divide an established community. As discussed above, the majority of the Project property is currently vacant land, void of any physical structures. Man-made improvements are found on land adjacent to the Project property including the BOR/CVWD Dike No. 4 and CVWD groundwater recharge basins abutting the Project to the east. Golf course communities (Andalusia, Trilogy and PGA West) lie approximately one mile to the north and northeast. The remaining land surrounding the Project property is vacant. The City has previously approved the development of a master planned community on the Project property through the adoption of the 1995 Specific Plan and the proposed Project sets forth the development of a master -planned residential and resort community of a reduced footprint relative to the previously approved Specific Plan. For all of the above reasons, implementation of the proposed Project would not result in the division of an established community. 104 562 The analysis contained in the Draft EIR concludes that with approval of the proposed Travertine Specific Plan Amendment, the Project would remain consistent with the City's General Plan, Zoning, Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP), and the Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) Regional Transportation Plan - Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). Therefore, implementation of the Project would not result in significant land use impacts due to inconsistency with any land use plan, policy, or regulation (Draft EIR pg. 4.11-26 through 4.11-31). The analysis contained in Table 1 of Appendix K in the Draft EIR concludes that with approval of the proposed Travertine Specific Plan Amendment, the Project would remain consistent with the City's General Plan. Therefore, implementation of the Project would not result in significant land use impacts due to inconsistency with the General Plan. The proposed SPA would supersede the current zoning designations on the Project property and set forth the planning areas, land use policies, development standards, and design guidelines for the Project. All development on the Project property shall adhere to the standards and requirements set forth in the SPA. Additionally, any changes to the Specific Plan shall be processed pursuant to California State Government Code Section 65453 and will be subject to the requirements of Section 9.240.010 (Specific Plan Review) of the La Quinta Zoning Ordinance. The review and approval of the proposed Zone Change would not result in significant impacts since the proposed zoning designations decrease land use density and intensity and are compliant with the proposed General Plan uses. The City is located within the boundaries of the Coachella Valley MSHCP (CVMSHCP), to which the City is a "Permittee". The La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 3.34, CVMSHCP/Natural Community Conservation Plan Mitigation Fee requires the City to collect development impact fees to fund acquisitions and manage conservation lands. The consistency analysis determined that the proposed Project is consistent with the applicable goals in the RTP/SCS. The Project proposes a mixed -use development that will construct infrastructure supporting the Project and employment opportunities. Multi -use roadways proposed for the Project would allow accessibility through the various land uses onsite. The development of multi -modal paths will create an efficient and accessible roadway system and allows reliable and safe travel throughout the site. These are consistent with RTP/SCS Goals 1— 3 and 5 — 8. RTP/SCS Goals 4 and 9 are associated with the regional transportation system and therefore are not applicable to the Project. Thus, implementation of the proposed Project would be in accordance with applicable local and state land use regulations and would not conflict with any established Land Use Plan, Policy, or Regulation. Based on the consistency analysis prepared for this Project, it will be consistent with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan. Impacts will be less than significant. 105 563 J. NOISE. i. Generation of Ground Borne Vibration: The Draft/Final EIR analyzed the potential impacts of vibration created by the proposed project. Potential ground -borne vibration is associated with vehicular traffic and construction activities. ii. Finding Regarding Ground Borne Vibration: The City Council finds that the project's impacts relating to the generation of ground borne vibration will be less than significant. Facts in Support of Findings: As described in the Draft EIR, ground -borne vibration levels from automobile traffic, including heavy trucks, are rarely perceptible beyond the roadway right-of-way, and the project generated traffic would not cause any significant adverse effects, including on the local residential communities (Draft EIR, at p. 4.12-30). To evaluate potential construction -related vibration, ground vibration levels associated with various types of construction equipment were analyzed, and as determined in the Noise Study, vibration levels at all nearby sensitive receptor locations would be below the perception threshold of 0.01 in/sec. (Draft EIR, Table 4.12-24). Accordingly, potential impacts from the generation of ground borne vibration and ground borne noise by project construction activities would be less than significant. K. POPULATION AND HOUSING. i. Induce Direct or Indirect Unplanned Growth: The Draft/Final EIR analyzed the potential impacts of the direct and indirect growth induced by the proposed Project. Direct population growth occurs from the development of new residential units. Indirect population growth could result from the creation of new jobs or the removal of barriers to growth, including the adoption of a Specific Plan such as the Travertine Specific Plan Project. The proposed Project has the potential to induce both direct and indirect population growth by providing up to 1,200 new dwelling units on approximately 378.8 acres, approximately 84.5 acres of tourist commercial uses associated with the proposed resort and golf club, and generating approximately 3,250 people and 250 new part-time and full-time jobs, consistent with the Project - specific VMT Evaluation (See Appendix M.2 of Draft EIR). ii. Displace People or Housing Resulting in the Need for New Housing: The Project property comprises undeveloped land at the southern edge of the City of La Quinta. The City of La Quinta has previously approved the development of the site for residential and mixed uses. 106 564 iii. Findings Regarding Induced Growth and Displacement of People or Housing: The City Council finds that the project's impacts relating to Project -related direct and indirect growth will be less than significant. Facts in Support of Findings: Population: The Project is proposing the construction of 1,200 dwelling units of varying types. Utilizing the VMT Evaluation's service population figure, the population anticipated from total buildout would equate to 3,250 new residents, for an approximate population of 41,110 in the City by 2035. This is an increase of approximately 8.6 percent, and still below the projected City's 2035 and SCAG's 2045 population forecasts of 46,297 and 47,700 people, respectively. The population increase associated with the Project would account for approximately 33 percent of the remaining capacity for population growth anticipated by SCAG in their RTC/SCS. Although buildout and full occupancy of the Project could potentially result in a 6.8 percent population increase of the current City population, this increase is consistent with City and regional growth projections, and public service providers and utilities will be able to adequately accommodate this growth. Therefore, the Project would not result in a substantial unanticipated population increase in the City. Impacts would be less than significant. Housing: According to the LQGP EIR, the City of La Quinta Land Use Plan can accommodate up to 31,603 residential dwelling units within the City limits, and also could provide for 21,500 dwelling units within the Sphere of Influence (SOI). Therefore, at total buildout and inclusive of buildout of the City's SOI, the City has the potential to result in a total of 53,103 dwelling units throughout the City's Planning Area (corporate limits and SOI). The 1,200 dwelling units proposed for the Project accounts for approximately 3.8 percent of the remaining capacity for dwelling units anticipated by the LQGP EIR. The proposed Project will provide a range of housing types and densities at varying price points that could help meet the anticipated demand for housing within different economic segments of the City of La Quinta. Proposed Project housing would consist of low density residential and medium density residential units, including larger -lot estate homes and high and middle -income single-family homes. It also provides for entry-level single-family homes and attached patio and duplexes units. The goals and policies of the City's Housing Element support the development of a variety of housing types and residential densities within the City, as proposed by the Travertine Specific Plan Amendment. Therefore, while implementation of the Project would result in a direct increase in population and housing, consistent with projected residential growth for the City. Therefore, the Project would not result in a substantial increase in total housing units in the City. Impacts would be less than significant. Employ: Project buildout has the potential to create approximately 250 part-time and full- time jobs. These include hospitality commercial, retail sales, resort and related service jobs. Many of these new jobs may be filled by workers already residing within the City or the Coachella Valley region or even within the proposed development. Employment growth resulting from Project implementation would result in a less than significant impacts because this increase is consistent with projected employment growth for the City. 107 565 Indirect Growth: The Project proposes the extension of Jefferson Street to the north and Avenue 62 to the east. The extension of these roads would be limited to providing access to the Project property and would not serve adjoining lands upon which future development would be induced. The Project property is secluded and is isolated between flood control and groundwater management facilities and public lands. The Project will require the development of an off -site 2.5-acre electric power substation and up to five off -site domestic water wells to support Project utility demand. The location of these off - site utilities will occur east of the Project property, in an area that is planned for and has been undergoing development over the past few decades. Accordingly, the Project is not anticipated to indirectly induce growth. The proposed Project does not include the demolition or conversion of existing residential dwelling units to non-residential uses. The Project does not include the displacement of any residents within the Project area. There will be no impact to the current population of the area as it is vacant land, and the population will increase based on new development. L. PUBLIC SERVICES. i. Impact Police Services, Schools, Parks, and Other Facilities: The Draft EIR analyzes the project's potential effects relating to the provision of public services, including fire protection, police protection, schools, parks, and other public facilities (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.14-12 — 4.14-18). The project will add residents, workers, and visitors to the project site, which will cause incremental increases in the demand for these public services. ii. Finding Regarding Impact to Police Services, School, Parks and Other Facilities: The City Council finds that the project's impacts on public services, including police services, schools, parks, and other public facilities will be less than significant. Facts in Support of Findings: Police: At current staffing levels, the Project's added population would result in a city-wide ratio of 1.19 officers per resident, which exceeds the 1 per 1,000 generally acceptable ratio. Based on discussion with the City Police Department there are adequate facilities and staffing sufficient to serve the Project (Draft EIR pg. 4.14-14). The Project would also be required to comply with Development Impact Fees in place at the time of construction. The current DIF fee for detached single-family residential is $9,380, which the City documented is adequate to mitigate any significant impacts to public facilities from new development. Payment of these fees goes towards the funding of public facilities including but not limited to fire stations, equipment, park and recreation facilities, major thoroughfares and bridges and traffic signalization. In addition, the Project property will generate transient occupancy and sales tax revenue that the City can use to fund additional officers and other personnel to increase staffing levels for the police services provided to the Project property and Citywide. The impact to police services will be less than significant. 108 566 Schools: As described in the Draft EIR, with payment of the applicable City Development Impact Fees (DIF) and statutory school developer fees, the project will not have any significant project - specific or cumulative adverse effects on public services. Specifically, the project is required to pay the City's DIF in the amount in effect at the time of construction (Draft EIR at p. 4.14-16). These fees are used by the City to fund additional public facilities, including fire stations, police cars and facilities, parks, public buildings, and traffic improvements. Parks: -Pursuant to the La Quinta Municipal Code (Section 13.48.050), the City goal is to provide a minimum of 3.0 acres of usable parkland per 1,000 residents. Section 13.48.050 requires usable parkland area per resident be determined by calculating the Project -generated population using the people per household (pph) identified in the U.S. Census. Currently, the City exceeds its level of service and the amount of parkland required by the Quimby Act, and new residents would not significantly impact park facilities. The Project includes approximately 23.5 acres of private parkland for the residents of the Project property, and approximately 27.2 acres of public parkland. According to the U.S. Census, the pph in the City of La Quinta is 2.55. With this 2.55 pph, it can be assumed that the Project would result in 3,060 residents (1,200 units multiplied by 2.55). The Project property will provide 7.68 acres of private parkland per 1,000 residents, and 8.89 acres of public parkland per 1,000 residents, for a combined total of 15.7 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents (in compliance with Section 13.48.050). The Project property would provide approximately 15.7 acres of park land per 1,000 residents, therefore exceeding the City's Municipal Code policy of 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents. The Project will also be required to comply with the City's Development Impact Fees which includes a Park and Recreation fee and would be required to either dedicate public parkland or pay in -lieu fees per the Quimby Act. The Project will also be required to comply with the City's Development Impact Fees which includes a Park and Recreation fee and would be required to either dedicate public parkland or pay in -lieu fees per the Quimby Act. Impacts are expected to be less than significant. Other Facilities: The Project could generate an additional 3,250 residents at full buildout. This would be an increase of 7.9 percent of the City's current (2022) population of 37,860 and still below the projected 2035 City population forecast of 46,297. Residents and resort guests will generate limited demand for increased municipal administrative services for everyday activities, including building permits, business licenses and short-term vacation rental permitting and monitoring. However, these increases in demand for services will be low, given the mixed -use nature of the Project, total potential increase in population, and fees and tax revenues generated by the Project will offset any marginal increase in demand for these services. M. RECREATION. i. Result in Deterioration of Parks or Require Construction or Expansion of Recreational Facilities: The Draft EIR analyzes the Project's potential effects on parks and recreation associated with the implementation of the Project (Draft EIR, at pp. 4.15-9 — 4.15-11). The project will add residents, workers, and visitors to the project site, which will cause incremental increases in the demand for the City's recreational facilities. 109 567 ii. Finding Regarding Deterioration of Parks and Recreational Facilities: The City Council finds that the project's impacts on recreational facilities will be less than significant. Facts in Support of Findings: The La Quinta Municipal Code (Chapter 13.48) requires the provision of three (3) acres of parkland set aside for each 1,000 residents. In order to calculate the number of parkland acres required, the number of dwelling units in a new subdivision is multiplied by the average household size (based on the latest U.S. Census information). Per the U.S. Census, the average household size in La Quinta is 2.55 persons, which would result in a population of 3,060. Therefore, pursuant to the La Quinta Municipal Code build -out of the proposed Project would require a total of 9.18 acres of parkland. The Project proposes private and public recreational uses including neighborhood and community parks, trails, and a central private spine trail that bisects the residential areas of the property will be accessible to the Project residents. Additionally, an approximately 5-mile-long public Grand Loop Trail will be developed around the perimeter of the Project site and will be accessible to the public from Avenue 62 and separated from the proposed planning areas by perimeter fencing. Pedestrian walkways, strolling trails, and an intra-connector trail will be located throughout the site, in addition to private picnic tables and barbeques. These private facilities occupy approximately 23.5 acres of the Project. The public golf practice facilities (including golf academy, driving range, and putting course), and staging facilities for the public regional interpretive trail will encompass approximately 27.2 acres of the Project. Thus, the Project will provide 7.68 acres of private parkland per 1,000 residents, and 8.89 acres of public parkland per 1,000 residents, for a combined total of 16.57 acres of parkland per 1,000 residents (in compliance with Section 13.48.050). The Project would provide approximately 16.57 acres of park land per 1,000 residents, thereby exceeding both the City's Municipal Code policy of 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents and the 5 acres per 1,000 residents goal set out in the General Plan GOAL PR-1. In accordance with the Quimby Act all new development and redevelopment projects will be required to pay development impact fees directed towards the preservation, expansion and maintenance with the City's recreational parks and facilities, and contribute to new parkland acquisition. Additionally, the City of La Quinta has established Development Impact Fees (DIF) for Parks/Recreation and Park Maintenance Facilities that apply to residential projects only. The DIF for Parks/Recreation is currently $2,106 per dwelling unit for Single Family Detached, and $1,794 per dwelling unit for Single Family Attached, according to the City's Development Impact Fee Study, adopted February 2020. New residential developments, including the proposed Project, would be required to pay the most up-to-date development impact fees to existing parks and City. The payment of the fees will assure that new park expansion is funded and assists in maintaining consistency with Policy PR-1.2 of the City of La Quinta General Plan (Parks, Recreation and Trails Element Goals, Policies and Programs). As previously stated, while Project impacts are expected to be less than significant, the Project's payment of Quimby Act Fees and City DIF would constitute a net benefit for City and regional parks and recreation facilities. 110 568 The proposed recreational facilities are designed as an integral part of the overall Travertine design, and will not result in any significant adverse physical effects on the environment. The proposed community and neighborhood parks would be developed following sound engineering and design standards for park facilities, recreation and open space amenities. The construction of Project design features associated with recreational uses are anticipated to have short-term construction impacts associated with construction -related air quality, energy, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards, hydrology and water quality, noise, and transportation. However, these construction impacts would result in less than significant impacts. N. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. i. Require or Result in Construction of New or Expanded Facilities for Water, Wastewater, Drainage or Utilities, the Construction of Which May Cause Significant Environmental Effects: The Draft EIR analyzes the construction of new or expanded facilities for water, wastewater, drainage, and utilities, and whether the construction of such facilities would have any significant adverse effect. Water: Currently, domestic water lines exist in the intersection of Avenue 60/Madison Street and the intersection of Avenue 62/Monroe Street. The existing line at Monroe Street and Avenue 62 is 24 inches, and the line at Madison and Avenue 60 is 30 inches. During Construction Phase 1, water lines will be extended into the Project to support construction activities. The proposed water system for the site would consist of a 12-inch water line connecting to the existing Avenue 60/Madison Street and Monroe Street/Avenue 62 water lines. The 12-inch water lines will connect to the existing infrastructure and travel south under Madison Street EVA extension, and west under Avenue 62. Twelve -inch and smaller lines will be installed throughout the Project property creating a network to serve the individual developments. Precise locations, alignments, and sizes of water service facilities will be determined at the Tentative and Final Map stage of development, per City and CVWD regulations and standards. Once the Project site is connected to the existing water lines, the Project's domestic water demand would be accommodated by CVWD. The Project will be connected to and served by CVWD's water distribution system. In addition to the Project's connection to the existing CVWD water lines, the Project will construct two CVWD water tanks and booster stations to store water at elevations necessary for the prescribed pressure zones. The water tanks are proposed to be located in the southwest property corner in order to provide the site with adequate domestic water and water pressure. The two water tanks with a storage capacity of 600,000 gallons and 2,650,000 gallons, identified as the "upper" and "lower" tanks (respectively). These water reservoirs and associated booster stations are proposed to convey well water and store it at elevations that provide required water pressure to service the site. The upper tank would be located at an elevation of 425 feet, while the lower tank would be located at an elevation of 335 feet. The water reservoir locations, including related facilities (service roadway, underground pipelines, etc.) are subject to review and approval by the USFWS, CVWD, and the CVCC. Both water tanks proposed onsite will be designed and developed in compliance with CVWD's Development Design Manual and included in Phase A Grading stage (grading of the southern portion of the site) and operable prior to lumber drop (EIR pg. 4.18-11). 111 569 Wastewater Facilities: CVWD has two wastewater treatment plants serving the City. For all land, including that of the proposed Project, in the City and Sphere located south of Miles Avenue, sewage is treated at the Mid -Valley Water Reclamation Plant (WRP-4), located on Avenue 62 and Filmore Street southeast of the City. This plant has capacity to treat 9.5 mgd. The average annual flow to this facility is approximately 4.75 mgd. The closest wastewater infrastructure to the Project site is located at the Monroe Street and Avenue 62 intersection. The Project proposes to extend CVWD sewer mains west of this point of connection to the project site via 18-inch sewer mains. Similar to the water infrastructure, the 18- inch sewer lines will below located underground below the Avenue 62 roadway towards the project site. Twelve -inch and 8-inch lines will be installed throughout the project creating a network to serve the individual developments. Natural Gas Facilities: Natural gas will be provided to the project site by Southern California Gas Company through the extension of existing natural gas infrastructure. Existing underground natural gas lines are located near the Project property along Avenue 58 and Madison Street, north and northeast of the Project property, respectively. A 4-inch natural gas line is located at the northern side of Avenue 58. A 4-inch natural gas line travels along Madison Street until approximately 425 feet south of the Madison Street and Avenue 58 intersection. At this location, the gas lines enter the Andalusia Country Club property, northeast of the Project site, and terminates at the southwestern corner of the Andalusia property (Draft EIR pg 4.18-20). Telecommunication Facilities: The Project property is located within the service areas of Frontier and Spectrum for telecommunications. The Project will be able to tie into the existing cable, gas and telecommunications lines, located along Avenue 58 and Madison Street. ii. Sufficiency of Water Supplies: To determine the adequacy of available water supplies to serve the proposed Project and reasonably foreseeable future development during normal, dry, and multiple dry years, the Draft EIR incorporates information from the WSA/WSV approved by CVWD as required by Section 15155 of the CEQA Guidelines (Draft EIR, Appendix N.1 and N.2). CVWD will be the public water supplier for the project with the source of domestic (potable) water supply for the project being the Indio Subbasin via CVWD's potable water distribution system. CVWD approved a WSA/WSV providing an assessment and verification of the availability of sufficient water supplies during normal, single -dry, and multiple -dry years over a 20-year projection period to meet the projected demands of the project, in addition to existing and planned future water demands of CVWD as required by the Water Code. The project's total water demand is projected to be 867.47- acre feet per year (AFY), which accounts for approximately 0.45 percent of the total projected growth in water demand by 2040 presented in the 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (See Draft EIR, at p. 4.18-23). iii. Wastewater Treatment System Capacity: CVWD provides sanitary sewer service to the project, and the capacity of CVWD's wastewater treatment facilities are addressed in the Draft EIR at pp. 4.18-3 and 4.18-24. Project flows would be delivered to CVWD's Wastewater Reclamation Plant No. 4 (WRP-4), located in Thermal. 112 570 WRP-4 has a plant capacity of 9.5 mgd. The annual average flow to this facility is approximately 4.75 MGD (5,300) AFY. Future flows could reach 34,500 AFY by 2045 without additional conservation. iv. Generate Excess Solid Waste: As described on pages 4.18-24 of the Draft EIR, Cal -Recycle data indicates the Badlands Disposal site has 7,800 cubic yards of remaining capacity, the El Sobrante Landfill has a remaining capacity of 143,977,170 tons of solid waste, and Lamb Canyon Disposal has a remaining solid waste capacity of 19,242,950 cubic yards. V. Comply with Statutes and Regulations Related to Solid Waste: The project is required to comply with the mandatory commercial and residential recycling requirements of Assembly Bill 341 and the Cal Green requirement for a construction waste management plan that includes diversion of at least 50% of construction and demolition materials from landfills, through recycling and/or reuse (Draft EIR, at p. 4.18-25). vi. Findings Regarding New and Expanded Utilities, Water Supplies, Wastewater Treatment System Capacity, and Solid Waste: The City Council finds that the Project's impacts concerning utilities and service systems will be less than significant. The City Council finds that the new and expanded utilities facilities to be constructed as part of the project, including the need for a new electrical substation, and water and sewer line extensions, will not have any significant adverse effects. The City Council further finds that there are sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project and all reasonably foreseeable future development, as well as all existing uses within the Indio Subbasin, during normal, dry, and multiple dry years, and further finds that the project's impacts relating to water use are less than significant. The City Council also finds that there is adequate capacity in CVWD's wastewater treatment system and Riverside County Department of Waste Resources' landfills to meet the project's wastewater and solid waste demands and finds that the project will comply with all applicable solid waste statutes, policies, and guidelines. Finally, the City Council finds that the Project will not have any new or substantially more severe impacts than analyzed and disclosed in the Draft EIR. Facts in Support of Findings: Require or Result in Construction of New or Expanded Facilities for Water, Wastewater, Drainage or Utilities. Water: As determined on pages 4.18-10 through 4.18-13, the proposed water improvements would not result in a significant affect to CVWD water facilities, and once connected to the CVWD water lines, CVWD will have sufficient water to accommodate the proposed Project. Extension of water lines will have less than significant impacts on expanded water services because the physical expansion will occur within the existing disturbed areas of Madison Street and Avenue 62. Onsite expansion will not result in significant environmental effects to CVWD's water infrastructure because they will be developed in compliance with CVWD's existing standards. 113 571 CVWD requires the construction of up to five wells and associated improvements at the off -site utility field at buildout of the Project. The number of well sites necessary to serve the Project has been determined in consultation with CVWD. The initial number of well sites based on the total acreage of the Project is equivalent to up to five well sites at maximum. The final number of well sites that will actually be needed to serve the site will be determined and incorporated into a development agreement between CVWD and the developer based on extenuating circumstances for providing alternative means and measures of water service to not only the Project property, but to the region. The process for acquisition of well sites will be done by a private purchase by the developer, where the environmental clearance coincident with the Project will be generic for all typical well sites located within CVWD's jurisdiction. The off -site well sites will be purchased by the developer and ultimately dedicated to CVWD. One off -site well will be constructed during the Grading Phase A stage within the identified utility field area north and east of the Project property. The developer must submit the location of the well sites to CVWD for approval. The well sites should be fully improved with exterior low -maintenance landscaping, 8-foot-high block walls, and a 20-foot-wide concrete driveway, access gates, curbs and gutters, 12-inch minimum diameter water pipeline stub which connects to the domestic water system, power and telephone service, and blow -off water drainage facilities. If the blow -off water will be retained within the site, then the minimum size of the site shall be 0.75 acres. If a retention basin is proposed outside the well site, then a minimum 0.50-acre site is acceptable; however, the maintenance of the pipeline to the retention basin and the retention basin itself, shall be the responsibility of the property owner. A civil site plan must be submitted for final approval prior to construction of the above requirements. The development of the five wells will provide water to future developments within CVWD's service area. All future wells developed on- and off -site would be consistent with the CVWD Development Design Manual (Chapter 5.6, Well Site and Well Pumping Plant Criteria). Construction impacts associated with the installation of the on -site and off -site connections are expected to be confined to trenching and related construction activities would be temporary and limited. All improvements related to water service will be coordinated in accordance with the City (if in La Quinta jurisdictional boundaries), Riverside County (if in unincorporated area), and CVWD standards which would preclude any interruptions in existing service of the surrounding properties. The Project will not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water treatment facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. Therefore, impacts to the existing water infrastructure would be less than significant. Wastewater Facilities: CVWD's WRP-4 has capacity to treat 9.5 mgd. The average annual flow to this facility is approximately 4.75 mgd. The proposed Project property is estimated to generate wastewater at 261,200 gallons per day (gpd) or 0.27 mgd, which is 2.7 percent of the plant's capacity. Given the current surplus capacity of 4.75 million gallons per day, CVWD has indicated that new wastewater treatment facilities are not required as a result of the proposed development. Precise locations, alignments, and sizes of sewer service facilities will be determined at the Tentative and Final Map stage of development, per City and CVWD regulations and standards. Once the project site is connected to the existing sewer lines, the project's wastewater would be accommodated by the CVWD. The Project will be connected to and served by the CVWD's 114 572 wastewater system. The conceptual on -site sewer facilities and improvements are shown on Exhibit 4.18-2, Conceptual Sewer Plan (EIR pg. 4.18-16). Overall, CVWD has sufficient treatment capacity to treat wastewater generated by the proposed Project, and the Project is not anticipated to require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded wastewater treatment facilities, the construction or relocation of which could cause significant environmental effects. The proposed Project's impact on wastewater treatment systems would be less than significant. Storm Water Facilities: Pursuant to the project -specific Drainage Master Plan (Draft EIR, Appendix J.3), the project provides sufficient on -site storm water retention to retain flows from the 100-year storm event, including flows coming onto the site from adjacent roadways, consistent with City requirements. The Project will incorporate off -site flood protection measures including a combination of perimeter embankments, and drainage swales along the western and southern site development boundaries, and improvements to the Guadalupe Creek Diversion Dikes on the north side. The conceptual drainage plan for the Travertine development ensures that all residents of the community, as well as downstream facilities and properties, will be protected from the local hydrologic conditions. To address off -site drainage conditions that interface with and currently pass through the Project site, the DMP proposes a flood protection system, which requires flood control barriers to direct off -site ephemeral drainage in a northerly and easterly direction, as it interfaces with the western and southern edges of the project, respectively. An Operations and Maintenance (O&M) Plan will be developed and implemented for the west and south banks and include provisions to monitor and remove sediment along the west bank. The O&M Plan is required as Mitigation Measure HWQ-1 and includes provisions to monitor and remove sediment along the west bank to maintain pre -project conditions and will reduce off -site siltation and erosion impacts to below a level of significance. (See G. Hydrology and Water Quality, i and iv, above, discussing flood flows and ability to result in flood hazard, tsunami, and seiche zones, as well as Section 4.10, Hydrology and Water Quality, in the DEIR). Onsite facilities will be managed by the project specific Water Quality Management Plan and its approved Maintenance Operations agreement. Electrical Facilities: The undergrounding of the onsite power lines will not result in significant environmental impacts since utility undergrounding will occur throughout the site. The Project will also underground the existing distribution lines along Avenue 62. The undergrounding of the offsite power lines will take place in the existing right-of-way on the north side of Avenue 62, which is an improved road. Onsite electrical power will be underground. The off -site substation required for the Travertine development will be constructed during the Grading Phase A stage. As discussed throughout the DEIR, the precise location of the future IID substation has not yet been determined and its impacts are analyzed at a programmatic level in this DEIR. The future substation must meet the requirements of IID and will be studied with metrics provided by the utility. The location of the 2.5-acre site will be within 2-miles of the Project's northern and northeastern boundaries. IID has indicated that distribution lines to the Project site will be on the order of 16 kV or larger. Lines are expected to be located within public street rights of way and are expected to be underground (Draft EIR pg. 4.18-20). 115 573 Natural Gas Facilities: Construction impacts associated with the installation of natural gas connections are expected to be confined to trenching in order to extend them to the Project property. Prior to ground disturbance, Project contractors would notify and coordinate with SoCalGas to identify the locations and depths of all existing gas lines and avoid disruption of gas service. The Project is not anticipated to require or result in the relocation or construction of new natural gas facilities which could result in significant environmental effects. The Project's impact to natural gas infrastructure will be less than significant. Telecommunications: The line extension will go southerly on Madison and will enter the site on both Avenue 62 west and Madison south of Avenue 62. Any surface disturbance will be stabilized following installation activities. The Project will not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded telecommunication facilities. Impacts would be less than significant. Sufficiency of Water Supplies Based on the information, analysis, and findings documented in the water WSA for the Project, there is substantial evidence to support a determination that there will be sufficient water supplies to meet the demands of the Project, as well as for future demands of the Project plus all forecasted demands in the next 20 years. CVWD's groundwater replenishment programs establish a comprehensive and managed effort to eliminate overdraft. These programs allow CVWD to maintain the groundwater subbasin as its primary water supply and to recharge the groundwater subbasin as its other supplies are available. CVWD has purchased 115,250 AF of additional annual SWP Table A amount since 2002. Additionally, the City has adopted a water -efficient landscape ordinance equal to or more stringent than CVWD's (in compliance with the Department of Water Resources Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance). This ordinance requires landscape design that incorporates climate appropriate plant material and efficient irrigation for all new and rehabilitated landscaping projects. Compliance with these ordinances will ensure that the proposed Project reduces water demand to meet target demands. The overall development will be expected to implement water conservation measures to reduce impacts to the public water supply per the CVWD UWMP. Therefore, impacts to water supplies are less than significant. Wastewater Treatment System Capacity The proposed Project is estimated to generate wastewater at 261,200 gpd, or 0.27 mgd, which is 2.7 percent of the plant's capacity. Effluent from WRP-4 is not currently suitable for water recycling due to the lack of tertiary treatment. However, CVWD plans to add tertiary treatment and reuse effluent from this plant in the future as development occurs. Per CVWD's UWMP, WRP-4 has the potential to be upgraded with a recycled water program with eventual construction of tertiary treatment, plant expansion, and conveyance facilities. The Project will undergo additional review by CVWD and City staff to ensure compliance with all current and applicable wastewater treatment requirements. Therefore, the Project is not expected to exceed CVWD's wastewater capacity demand and impacts are less than significant (Draft EIR pg. 4.18-24). 116 574 Generate Excess Solid Waste Using the annual generation factors, including a residential solid waste generation factor of 0.41 tons per dwelling unit from the Riverside County General Plan EIR No. 521, adopted in 2015, and 2.4 tons per 1,000 square feet for the commercial operation, the Project could generate up to 894.48 tons per year of solid waste at full buildout, as indicated in the table below. As part of its long-range planning and management activities, the Riverside County Department of Waste Resources (RCDWR) ensures that Riverside County has a minimum of 15 years of capacity, at any given time, for future landfill disposal. The 15-year projection of disposal capacity is prepared each year as part of the annual reporting requirements for the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. The most recent 15-year projection by the RCDWR indicates that the remaining disposal capacity of countywide waste facilities in the year 2024 is 28,561,626 tons, and therefore, no additional capacity is needed to dispose of countywide waste through 2024. In addition, all future development would be required to comply with mandatory commercial and residential recycling requirements of Assembly Bill 341. Therefore, the Project will comply with all applicable solid waste statutes, policies, and guidelines; and the Project will be served by a landfill with sufficient capacity to serve the Project. Therefore, impacts relative to solid waste are less than significant. (Draft EIR, at pg. 4.18-24 to 4.18-25). Comely with Statutes and Regulations Related to Solid Waste. The project will comply with all applicable solid waste statutes, policies and guidelines. All development, including the proposed Project, is required to comply with the mandatory commercial and multi -family recycling requirements of Assembly Bill 341. The California Green Building Standards Code (CalGreen) applies to all cities in California, and mandates that all new building construction develop a waste management plan that includes diversion of at least 50 percent of construction and demolition material from landfills, through recycling and/or reuse. Prior to applying for a permit, the contractor or property owner must submit a Construction and Demolition Debris Management Plan to the City's Environmental Coordinator. There are no impacts relative to applicable solid waste regulations (Draft EIR, at pg. 4.18-25). O. WILDFIRE. i. Substantially Impair an Adopted Emergency Response Plan or Evacuation Plan: The Project's Fire Master Plan was compared to the City of La Quinta's Emergency Operations Plan (EOP). The La Quinta EOP addresses emergency management within four defined phases including (1) Preparedness, (2) Response, (3) Recovery, and (4) Mitigation. ii. Exacerbate Wildfire Risks and Pollutant Concentrations: The physical characteristics of the Project site indicate a low probability for wildfire risk due to the sparse vegetation and topographic conditions. Although the Project site and surrounding areas do not provide conditions conducive to wildfires, the Project proposes open space areas and fuel 117 575 breaks which will further reduce the likelihood that the Project would be impacted by fires or wildfires. iii. Require Installation or Maintenance of Infrastructure that will Exacerbate Fire Risk: The Project property is currently undeveloped and vacant and is not served by roads, electrical utilities, natural gas utilities, water, and other utilities or infrastructure. iv. Expose People or Structures to Significant Risks including Downslope, Downstream Flooding or Landslides, as a Result of Runoff, Post -Fire Slope Instability, or Drainage Changes: The existing vegetation communities onsite include creosote scrub, and desert scrub, generally on loosely packed or sandy soils. These conditions do not support dense vegetation growth. Therefore, fuels for fires are not present or is very limited. V. Findings Regarding Impairment of Emergency Response Plan, Wildfire Risk, Fire Risk, and Downslope and Downstream Flooding or Landslides: The City Council finds that the wildfire impacts will be less than significant. Facts in Support of Findings: The Draft EIR analyzes the Project's Fire Master Plan to the EOP's four phases of emergency management (i.e., Preparedness, Response, Recovery, and Mitigation). Consistent with the City EOP, the Fire Master Plan and outline actions that prepare, respond, recover, and address hazards involved with fires and wildfires. Thus, Project construction and operational activities would not substantially impair the City's adopted EOP. Although the physical characteristics of the Project site indicate a low probability for wildfire risk due to the sparse vegetation and topographic conditions, the Project will implement fuel breaks with the use of Open Space Natural land uses between and wildland and mountain slopes. The proposed Project will establish a buffer of open space areas adjacent to the slopes of Coral Mountain and Martinez Rockslide. Habitable structures are not proposed adjacent to the toe of slope of the neighboring mountains. Planning Area 20, located at the southern portion of the site, occupies approximately 301.2 acres adjacent to the Martinez Rockslide landform. Planning Area 20 is designated for Open Space Natural land uses and will separate the proposed habitable structures by approximately 950 feet. Additionally, approximately 250 feet of open space areas will separate the proposed structures from Coral Mountain to the north. The edge/transitional landscape treatment that surrounds the community is native untouched desert, and then a band of transitional landscape planting will occur that will have native plant reseeding and native tree planting. This edge/transitional planting area will vary in width according to location. In development areas where private homeowner parcels and public gathering areas are adjacent to the Conservation Area, the buffer would be a minimum width of 74 feet. These areas will be landscaped with native vegetation, which will link and extend the character of the 118 576 undisturbed desert areas surrounding the Project to the disturbed interior of the Project. Dense vegetation is not proposed in this area. As such, the edge conditions landscaped with native plants will act as defensible space (i.e., areas with little vegetative fuel for wildfires), separating the Project's developable planning areas from the open space areas surrounding the Project. Overall, wildfires and their effects are not expected to affect the Project site due to the Project's open space areas and proposed fuel breaks as part of the Project design, as well as the lack of vegetative fuels in the surrounding area. The proposed roads, fuel breaks, water infrastructure, and electrical infrastructure are not The development of roads typically involves the removal of vegetation along the proposed road, which removes wildfire fuel, and thus, does not exacerbate fire risk. Additionally, roads could be dirt or gravel (during construction), and asphalt (during construction and operation). Additionally, asphalt and all-weather access roads will allow public and emergency access to the Project during construction and operation. The proposed roads will not exacerbate fire risks. CVWD establishes guidelines in their Development Design Manual (May 2022) to ensure that water infrastructure is reviewed and developed to CVWD standards. The Development Design Manual requires review from fire services prior to approval of the Project, and establishes regulations that ensure projects within their service area are equipped with fire -reducing systems (such as fire hydrants, sprinklers, etc.). The Project shall comply with the development standards of CVWD's Design Manual. Therefore, the Project's compliance with CVWD's established regulations will ensure that water infrastructure would not exacerbate fire risk. An off -site substation will be required for the Travertine Project and will be constructed during the Construction Phase I stage. The 2.5-acre site required for the substation will be located east of Dike 4 and within the off -site utility field. All off -site parcels required for utilities will be chosen to fit the requirements of IID consistent with their Wild Fire Mitigation Plan 2020 — 2022, which states that IID electric facilities are to be designed and constructed meeting or exceeding relevant federal, State, and industry standards. The California Public Utilities Commission's (CPUC) General Order (GO) 95 is a key industry standard for design and construction for overhead electrical facilities. Additionally, IID monitors and follows, as appropriate, the National Electric Safety Code. Additional fire hazard reduction measures include: no new power lines in high or extreme fire threat areas; vegetation management and inspections; and public safety power shutoff. These measures, as well as additional measures outlined in the Wild Fire Mitigation Plan 2020 - 2022, reduce the risk of the infrastructure -exacerbating wildfires. As a part of project design, the areas adjacent to Coral Mountain and Martinez Rockslide will be preserved as Open Space Recreational and Natural lands. This will ensure habitable structures are removed from the slopes of these mountains from rock fall or landslide hazards by Project open space buffers. Buildings are proposed to be located 250 feet south of slope of Coral Mountain. A 301.2-acre buffer area of undisturbed natural lands is proposed at the southern portion of the Project, separating the proposed residential and resort areas from the slopes of the Martinez Rockslide by approximately 950 feet. Additionally, the slopes of the surrounding mountains do not contain dense vegetation that would result in wildfires, and potentially associated landslides. Therefore, the proposed Project, and the development area within the Project would not be impacted by wildfires and post -fire slope instabilities. 119 577 VII. FINDINGS REGARDING IMPACTS DETERMINED TO HAVE NO IMPACT The Final EIR also determined, based upon substantial evidence in the record, the following impacts associated with the project result in no impacts and no mitigation is required. The City hereby adopts the findings, analysis, and conclusions regarding these potential impacts set forth in the Final EIR, and incorporates the same herein by this reference. A. MINERAL RESOURCES. i. Effects on the loss of availability of a known mineral resource or locally important mineral resource: The Coachella Valley contains valued mineral resources due to the region's highly active geologic nature. Mineral resources found throughout the region include sand, gravel, crushed stone, copper, limestone, and tungsten. Many of these resources are important for common construction projects including asphalt, concrete, road base, stucco, and plaster. Sand and gravel have been transported by wind and rain into the Valley from surrounding mountains over millennia. California requires that mineral resources be identified and that the mining of identified resources be protected. According to Figure OS-6 of the City of La Quinta County General Plan, the Project site is located in an MRZ-3 area. Lands that fall under the MRZ-3 designation make up a small portion of La Quinta. The MRZ-3 designation is found only in the southwestern portion of the City, including along the Coral Reef Mountains and within the Cove area. Aside from the development that already exists within the Cove, the majority of land in the MRZ-3 zone is designated as open space. The La Quinta General Plan Environmental Impact Report (LQGP EIR) states that undeveloped sites located in MRZ-3 zones in the City are surrounded by urban development and mineral extraction activities are incompatible and unlikely on the remaining vacant parcels. The project site is currently designated for residential and golf course uses, and has been since the 1995 Travertine and Green Specific Plan. Therefore, the LQGP EIR concludes that development of areas within these land use categories will not result in the loss of availability of locally important mineral resource considered valuable to the region and state and does not result in the loss of availability of mineral resource recovery sites. ii. Finding Regarding Mineral Resources: The City Council finds that the Project does not result in impacts to mineral resources, since the site is not recognized as a mineral resource recovery site delineated in the City of LQGP, General Plan EIR or resource maps prepared pursuant to SMARA. No mitigation measures are necessary. Facts in Support of Finding: The project site is not recognized as a mineral resource recovery site delineated in the City of LQGP, General Plan EIR or resource maps prepared pursuant to SMARA. The land has for many years been designated for residential and golf course development, and not for mineral extraction. Therefore, the proposed project will not result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state, and will not result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local 120 578 general plan, specific plan or other land use plan. For the above reasons, the proposed project will not result in impacts to mineral resources. VIII. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES ANALYZED IN THE EIR. The State CEQA Guidelines section 15126.6(a)(1) requires the discussion of a "a reasonable range of alternatives to a project, or the location of a project, which would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the project but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the project, and evaluate the comparative merits of the alternatives." The Guidelines state that the "range of potential alternatives to the proposed project shall include those that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic objectives of the project and could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects" (Section 15126(c)). The Final EIR evaluated a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed Project. These alternatives are: Alternative 1: No Project/No Build Alternative 2: No Project/Originally Approved SP Alternative 3 : Phase 1 (1 A and 1 B) Only When a lead agency has determined that a proposed project will still cause one or more significant environmental effects that cannot be substantially lessened or avoided after the adoption of all feasible mitigation measures, prior to approving the project as mitigated, the agency must consider the environmentally superior alternatives identified in the EIR and find that they are infeasible before approving the project. (Pub. Resources Code, section 21081(a)(2); CEQA Guidelines section 15091(a)(3).) An alternative may be rejected if it is "infeasible," does not avoid significant environmental impacts, or if it fails to achieve most of the basic project objectives identified within the EIR. (CEQA Guidelines section 15126.6(c). "Feasible" means capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, legal, social, and technological factors. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21061.1; CEQA Guidelines, § 15364.) Other considerations, such as practicality, may also provide the basis for an infeasibility finding. (Pub. Resources Code, § 21081, subd. (a)(3); California Native Plant Society v. City of Santa Cruz (2009) 177 Cal.AppAth 957, 1002.) Infeasibility encompasses notions of desirability, to the extent that desirability is based on a reasonable balancing of the relevant economic, environmental, social, or technological factors. . The EIR identifies Alternative 1 and Alternative 3 as the environmentally superior alternatives. Alternative 1: No Project/No Build CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6 (e) requires an EIR to include a "No Project" alternative. The purpose of describing and analyzing a No Project alternative is to allow decision makers to compare the impacts of approving the proposed project with the impacts of not approving the proposed project. Under the No Project/No Build Alternative ("Alternative 1"), the project would remain in its current and existing vacant condition. The existing visual character and visual resources would remain the same, and none of the significant impacts of the project would occur. 121 579 Finding and Facts in Support of Finding Although the No Project/No Build Alternative would be considered an environmentally superior alternative in that it would avoid the significant adverse effects of the Project; the City Council of the City of La Quinta rejects the No Project/No Build Alternative for the following reasons: 1. The No Project/No Build Alternative is inconsistent with the General Plan, insofar as this alternative would not implement the General Plan's land uses for the property, which the City Council considers inconsistent with its vision for City land use policy under the General Plan. 2. The No Project/No Build Alternative does not meet three of the five Project objectives identified in the EIR to the same degree as the proposed Project. In particular, Alternative 1 would not result in the development of a mixed -use master planned community, facility the attainment of the City's Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) targets for new residential construction, or result in the development of a project that will generate sustainable, diversified increase to the City's tax revenue stream, and that is successful for both the City and the master developer. 3. The Project as proposed will create a private residential community with resort and golf training facility and a variety of interrelated and mutually supportive commercial and recreational land uses that will generate transient occupancy and sales tax revenues in order to enhance the City's economic base and long-term financial stability, which are significant public benefits that will not be realized under the No Project/No Build Alternative. 4. The Project site remaining in its existing condition is not considered the most likely or legally feasible outcome if the proposed Project is not approved, due to the existing entitlements associated with the 1995 Travertine Specific Plan, which would remain in effect if the Project is disapproved. The City Council therefore finds that the No Proj ect/No Build Alternative fails to meet the majority of the Project objectives and is otherwise infeasible, and rejects it. Alternative 2: No Project/Originally Approved SP Alternative Under this Alternative, the property would be developed under the existing Travertine Specific Plan which was approved in 1995. This Alternative would develop approximately 909 acres consisting of 2,300 dwelling units on 466.6 acres, general commercial uses on 10 acres, tourist commercial uses such as a 500-room resort/hotel a tennis club, private recreation in individual developments on approximately 30.9 acres, open space recreational (36-hole golf course facility) on approximately 365.3 acres, major community facilities on 4.1 acres, and 12.2 acres of open space natural land. 122 580 Finding and Facts in Support of Finding The City Council of the City of La Quinta rejects the No Project/Originally Approved SP Alternative for the following reasons: 1. The No Project/Originally Approved SP Alternative does not meet three of the five Project objectives to the same degree as the proposed Project. In particular, Alternative 2 does not preserve and mitigate impacts to sensitive biological resources to the same degree as the proposed Project and in a manner consistent with current Federal, State, and local requirements, does not involve the development of a project that will generate a diversified and sustainable increase in the City's tax base as it relies on a larger percentage of residential uses than the proposed Project, and is not designed to the enhanced degree of flooding and hydrological risk protection that characterizes the proposed Project.. 2. The No Project/Originally Approved Alternative would not avoid the proposed Project's potentially significant impacts and would generally result in increased impacts on the environment relative to the proposed Project, including increased VMT, Air Quality, GHG, Energy, Utility and Services impacts due to the doubling of residential traffic. The City Council therefore finds the No Project/Originally Approved Alternative fails to meet the majority of the Project objectives and is otherwise infeasible, and rejects it. Alternative 3: Phase I Only Alternative Phase 1 Only Alternative ("Alternative 3") would develop Phase 1 (A and B) of the subject property, which includes 604 residential dwelling units on approximately 243.4 acres, a resort/golf facility on approximately 46.2 acres, open space recreational on approximately 35.5 acres, and open space natural uses on approximately 301.2 acres. Development of Alternative 3 would include the westerly extension of Avenue 62. However, this Alternative would not develop the southerly extension of Jefferson Street. Implementation of Alternative 3 would include a 46.2-acre resort/golf use, which would develop a golf training/practice facility with clubhouse and banquet facilities. Alternative 3 would require a General Plan Amendment and Zone Change to allow the land use and zoning changes, similar to the proposed Project. Finding and Facts in Support of Finding Although Alternative 3 would be considered an environmentally superior alternative in that it would avoid the significant adverse effects of the Project, the City Council of the City of La Quinta reject Alternative 3 for the following reasons: Alternative 3 does not meet the majority of the Project objectives to the same degree as the proposed Project, including developing a mixed -use master planned community, to include varying housing densities and housing product types, as it would not include medium density residential housing; facilitate the attainment of the City's RHNA targets for new residential construction to the same degree as the proposed Project; or develop a project that will generate a 123 581 sustainable, diversified increase to the City's tax revenue stream, resulting in a project that is economically successful for the City as well as the master developer to the same degree as the proposed Project. In particular, Alternative 3 would result in a substantial reduction of revenue to the City's General Fund relative to the proposed Project. The City Council therefore finds Alternative 3 fails to meet the majority of the Project objectives to the same degree as the Project and is otherwise infeasible, and rejects it. Additional Findings Regarding the Environmentally Superior Alternatives A summary comparison of impacts associated with the project Alternatives is provided in the Draft EIR in Table 7-5, Comparison of Alternatives to Project. Of the Alternatives considered in this Draft EIR section, the No Project/No Build Alternative is environmentally superior to the other Alternatives because this Alternative would avoid any impacts identified for the project or any other alternative. Although Alternative 1 is environmentally superior, it does not meet any of the objectives of the proposed project because it would not involve any development of the site. The CEQA Guidelines require that the EIR identify an environmentally superior alternative to the project and "if the environmentally superior alternative is the `no project' alternative, the EIR shall also identify an environmentally superior alternative among the other alternatives." CEQA Guidelines Section 15126[e][2]. In general, the environmentally superior alternative minimizes adverse impacts to the environment, while still achieving the basic project objectives. Of the remaining alternatives, Alternative 3 (Phase 1 Only) would be the environmentally superior alternative because it would result in lesser impacts in a number of resource areas and would reduce or eliminate the significant and unavoidable impacts of the proposed Project relative to air quality and greenhouse gas emissions. Alternative 3 does not meet the to the same degree as the proposed project the objectives of facilitating the attainment of the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation targets for new residential construction; or of developing a project that will generate a sustainable, diversified increase to the City's tax revenue stream, resulting in a project that is economically successful for the City as well as the master developer. As a result, Alternative 3 is rejected. IX. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS Under CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, CEQA requires the decision -making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, of a proposed project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered "acceptable." As described in Section III of these Findings, the Project will have significant and unavoidable impacts in the following areas: 124 582 (1) under the CalEEMod modeling, the Project will generate regulated air pollutants (VOCs) at a rate that exceeds the significance thresholds utilized in the EIR, and therefore, would conflict with the implementation of the Air Quality Management Plan; (2) the Project will result in additional GHG emissions that exceed the quantitative threshold of significance utilized in the EIR, and even with implementation of the recommended mitigation measure requiring the purchase of carbon credits, this effect is considered significant and unavoidable because the use of carbon credits has not been established in the Coachella Valley area as effective mitigation for residential and resort communities; and (3) the Project will generate VMT that exceed the significance threshold utilized in the EIR. As permitted under CEQA Guideline 15093(b) the City Council of the City of La Quinta adopts and makes this statement of overriding considerations concerning these unavoidable significant impacts to explain why the Project's specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, outweigh its unavoidable impacts. The Project site provides an appropriate location for the proposed residential, golf course and commercial uses that will provide employment, housing, recreation, and increased property and sales tax revenue opportunities for the City, its residents and visitors. The City Council of the City of La Quinta finds that the Project's significant environmental impacts are acceptable when balanced with the project's benefits. Each of the benefits cited below constitutes a separate and independent basis that justifies approval of the project and outweighs the unavoidable adverse environmental effects of approving the Project, and thus make the adverse environmental effects acceptable. Thus, even in the absence of one or more of the reasons set forth below, the City has determined that each remaining reason, or any combination of reasons, is a sufficient basis for approving the Project, notwithstanding any significant and unavoidable impacts that may occur. 1. As documented in the Fiscal Impact Analysis prepared by The Natelson Dale Group, Inc. (TNDG) dated July 27, 2023, at buildout, the Project will generate City General Fund review of nearly $6.0 million per year, with a net positive impact of approximately $2.0 million per year. A substantial component of Project revenues ($980,162 Resort and $2,162,625 Short Term Rental) derived from transient occupancy tax (TOT) revenue for the City, which the City Council considers a critical component of the Project. Without the TOT revenue from Short Term Rentals, development of the Project would generate City general fund costs with insufficient revenue to cover those additional costs. 2. The Project provides a complimentary mix of interrelated and mutually supportive residential, commercial and recreational uses that create a private resort -like community which minimizes GHG emissions and vehicle miles traveled to the degree feasible through on -site Project design features and on -site and off -site mitigation measures, including promoting walkability and non -motorized 125 583 connectivity as an integral part of the Project design, establishing residential neighborhoods that are linked through multi -use trails that connect neighborhoods, open space, and parks throughout the Project. 3. The Project reduces the overall density of planned development for the site, while adding to the diversity of housing and recreational amenities within the City, and also maintaining low -density residential uses around the majority of the Project perimeter that matches the surrounding residential communities. 4. The Project will contribute to both temporary and permanent employment and economic growth opportunities in this portion of the City, which provides a significant public benefit to the City and its residents. The Project would result in direct employment -based population growth from the proposed mix of employment -generating land uses, including planned resort recreational uses. Project buildout has the potential to create approximately 250 part-time and full- time jobs. These include hospitality commercial, retail sales, resort, and related service jobs (VMT Evaluation, Urban Crossroads, Inc. Appendix M.2 of DEIR). Businesses and transient occupancy tax generated from the Project provides funds for the City to support City-wide improvements, which benefit the residents of the City. 5. In addition to generating a recurring fiscal benefit to the City's General Fund, the Project will contribute towards the funding of future infrastructure and public infrastructure improvements within the City and surrounding area in the amount of $11.6 million, including DIF fee contributions to a new fire station in the City and improvements to the local and regional circulation system through the payment of TUMF and DIF fees, and fair share contributions to multiple signalization projects required as part of General Plan build out. 6. In addition to the benefits identified in items 1 through 5 above, the Project will contribute nearly $7,000,000 toward development of a substation for the area of south La Quinta to provide electricity to the Project and surrounding area. The substation will be developed during Phase 1 of the project. 7. The Project will benefit the unique biological resources in the City and broader Coachella Valley region by contributing substantial funding through payment of the CVMSHCP Local Development Mitigation Fee in the amount of $ 2,242,007.50 to support CVCC's ongoing efforts to acquire and maintain essential habitat for special status species, which will contribute to CVCC's ongoing efforts to protect the Peninsular bighorn sheep and their habitat. 8. The Project will provide surplus parkland and recreation resources in the City of La Quinta, including public golf practice facilities (including gold academy, driving range and putting course), and staging facilities for the public regional interpretive trail encompassing approximately 27.2 acres, amounting to 16.57 acres of parkland per resident, thereby exceeding both the City's Municipal Code policy of 3.0 acres per 1,000 residents and the 5 acres per 1,000 goal set out in the City General Plan. 126 584 9. The Project will support and implement all eight of the guiding principles of the City's 2035 General Plan, including: (i) supporting "a fiscally sound community" that capitalizes on the City's unique development opportunities; (ii) supporting "a resort oriented community" that maintains and improves the residential and golf opportunities in La Quinta, consistent with its reputation as a top resort and recreational destination; (iii) supporting "a neighborhood -oriented community" that strives to ensure that existing and future housing for all residents continues to be diverse in type and of high quality; (iv) supporting "a conservation focused community" that promotes the efficient use of water and energy resources through replacing the previously approved golf course use on the site with current responsible water use design concepts, a smaller footprint and incorporating integrated design principles and state-of-the-art efficiency features to ensure an environmentally sustainable development; (v) supporting "a safe community" through development standards that promote safe indoor and outdoor spaces in this gated community that will provide on -site private security and provide substantial funding for emergency services (both through payments of DIF and generation of TOT and sale tax revenue); and (vi) supporting "a full service community" that provides and maintains adequate service levels and facilities for streets, water, sewer, storm drains and other infrastructure, which here include privately owned and maintained streets within the project as well as improvements to the City's arterial streets and funding for areawide circulation system upgrades, as well as constructing all required sewer, water, and storm drain infrastructure; and (vii) supporting "a circulation minded community" that promotes and encourages a broad range of transportation opportunities that reduce impacts on the environment to the degree feasible by providing a complimentary mix of residential, commercial, and recreational uses that are interconnected through multi -modal roads, trails and paths that reduce the length of vehicle trips and promote non -motorized travel. The Project will pay substantial City Development Impact Fees and Quimby Act fees. The implementation of this measure is assured and enforceable because it is included in the Development Agreement and conditions of approval for the Specific Plan. In light of the foregoing, and the information contained within the Final EIR and other portions of the Project record of proceedings, the City Council concludes that implementation of the Project 127 585 will result in the development of a unique project that provides substantial economic, legal, social, technological, and other benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, as outlined above, which outweigh and make acceptable the significant, unavoidable environmental impacts associated with the Project and, accordingly, adopts this Statement of Overriding Considerations. 128 586 X. FINDINGS REGARDING CERTIFICATION OF FINAL EIR Pursuant to CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, the City Council of the City of La Quinta as the lead agency under CEQA is responsible for certification of the EIR and therefore makes the following findings: 1. The Final EIR was completed in compliance with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines; 2. The Final EIR was presented to the City Council, which reviewed and considered the information in the Final EIR prior to making its decision on the Project; 3. The certification of the Final EIR and the findings set forth herein reflect the City Council's and the City's independent judgment and analysis in its capacity as the CEQA Lead Agency for the Project; and 4. The City Council adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Attachment A) to reduce or avoid the significant and mitigable impacts of the Project to the extent feasible. 5. The City Council finds that the Final EIR, properly evaluated the Project's potentially significant cumulative impacts based on General Plan buildout, and that this analysis included all past, present and probable future projects in the project vicinity that could cause or contribute to such significant cumulative effects. 6. The City Council finds that the additional information and evidence submitted after release of the Draft EIR and prior to certification of the Final EIR, including responses to comments on the Draft EIR does not constitute "significant new information," as defined in CEQA Guidelines Section 15088.5, but rather, merely clarifies and amplifies the information provided in the Draft EIR. (i) By these Findings, the City ratifies, adopts and incorporates the analysis, explanation, findings, responses to comments and conclusions of the Final EIR. In addition, the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, and the mitigation measures specified therein, as well as the project design features identified in the Draft EIR, are hereby approved and adopted, and shall be fully enforceable through the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, , as well as permit conditions, agreements or other measures. Any finding required to be made by the City shall be deemed made, regardless of where it appears in this document. All of the language included in this document constitutes findings by the City, whether or not any particular sentence or clause includes a statement to that effect. The City intends that these findings be considered as an integrated whole and, whether or not any part of these findings fail to cross-reference or incorporate by reference any other part of these findings, that any finding required or committed to be made by the City with respect to any particular subject matter of the Final 129 587 EIR, shall be deemed to be made if it appears in any portion of these findings. If any term, provision or portion of these Findings or the application of these Findings to a particular situation is held by a court to be invalid, void or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of these Findings, or their application to other actions related to the Project, shall continue in full force and effect unless amended or modified by the City. 130 588 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX EXHIBIT B FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Travertine Specific Plan et al, La Quinta CA 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Chapter 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4.1 Introduction If mitigation measures are required or incorporated into a project as part of the CEQA process, the lead agency must adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) to ensure compliance with the project's mitigation measures. Sections 15097 and 15126.4(a)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines provide that a project's mitigation measures must be enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other mechanisms. CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines further provide that the MMRP must be adopted at the time of project approval. However, while the MMRP does not have to be included in the EIR, for the sake of maximizing public transparency, a copy of the proposed Project's MMRP has been included in this Final EIR below. In light of the foregoing, this Chapter contains the proposed Project's MMRP. The MMRP was prepared to provide a program for not only monitoring and reporting on the Project's mitigation measures, but also enforcing compliance with respect to the implementation of each mitigation measure adopted for the Project. The purpose of the mitigation measures is to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects of the Project. 4.2 Monitoring Authority The City may delegate duties and responsibilities for monitoring compliance with the objective performance standards established by any given mitigation measure to designated environmental monitors or consultants as deemed necessary. The City may also delegate such duties and responsibilities to certain responsible agencies, affected jurisdictions, enforcement and regulatory agencies of the state or county, special districts and other agencies. The same duties and responsibilities may also be delegated to qualified private entities which accept the delegation. The City's Development Services (or equivalent positions of other designated agencies or entities) must ensure that the officials delegated the duties or responsibilities to monitor any given set of mitigation measures are qualified to assume such duties and responsibilities. Any deviation from the procedures identified under the MMRP shall require prior approval or authorization by the City. Moreover, any deviations from any of the established monitoring procedures set forth in the MMRP and any remedial actions taken to correct such deviations shall be reported immediately to the City by the assigned environmental monitor or consultant. Notwithstanding any such delegation, the City shall remain responsible for monitoring the implementation of all of the project's mitigation measures in accordance with the project's MMRP. Travertine Final EIR 4-1 July 2024 589 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 4.3 Enforcement Responsibility The mitigation measures for the proposed project will primarily apply prior to or during construction of the project in all phases of development the project. The City shall be responsible for enforcing each mitigation measure, albeit the City may assign such enforcement responsibilities to a qualified environmental monitor. The assigned environmental monitor for each construction activity shall report any problems with enforcement to the City and appropriate agencies. The MMRP prepared for the proposed project will be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. 4.4 Mitigation Monitoring Table Table 4-1, Travertine Specific Pion Amendment Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, below identifies for each mitigation measure: (1) the potential impact on the environment that the mitigation measure is focused on; (2) a description of the mitigation measure; (3) the entity responsible for monitoring the mitigation measure; (4) the timing for implementing the measure; and (5) the anticipated level of significance of the impact at issue after mitigation. Travertine Final EIR 4-2 July 2024 590 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Table 4-1 Travertine Specific Plan Amendment Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Level of Potential Impacts on Mitigation Measure Responsible for Timing g Significance the Environment Monitoring After Mitigation Section 4.1, Aesthetics AES-1 In order to reduce the proposed substation's impact on the existing visual character and c. Visual character or reduce the potential degradation of scenic scenic quality quality of the surrounding area, the Project City Council/ d. Light and glare applicant shall use one or more of the following Planning or comparable techniques: perimeter barriers, Commission landscaping appropriate for the substation IID During review of Less than facility. Additionally, glare shall be controlled Substation Significant through the use of non -reflective surfaces, Public Works dulling finishes to help blend the structures with Department the surroundings and reduce glare and color contrast, or comparable methods subject to the Project Applicant approval of IID. See 13I0-12, B1O-17, and BIO-30 Section 4.2, Air Quality AQ-1 The General Contractor and all sub -contractors shall ensure that during Project and off -site b. Result in a utility construction activities, off -road diesel City Planning & cumulatively construction equipment rated at 50 horsepower Public Works During ground considerable net (hp) or greater, complies with EPA/CARB Tier 4 Department disturbing Less than increase if any off -road emissions standards or equivalent and activities & Significant criteria pollutant shall ensure that all construction equipment is Project Contractor construction tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Travertine Final EIR 4-3 July 2024 591 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM a. Conflict with implementation of applicable air quality pp q Y plan AQ-2 The Project applicant must comply with South Coast AQMD Rule 445 (Wood -Burning Devices as amended b explicitly ), Y p Y prohibiting the use of wood burning stoves and fireplaces in the proposed new development. City Planning & Public Works Department Project Contractor Prior to the approval of grading plans Less than Significant Mitigation Measures to Reduce VOC from Mobile Sources: AQ-3 The Project operator shall provide and/or accommodate facilities within the Project property such as bicycle parking and storage, to encourage bicycle use instead of driving as a method to reduce or otherwise eliminate certain vehicle trips within the Project area. AQ-4 The Project operator of the on -site resort facilities shall implement procedures to accommodate remote work or telecommuting, as applicable to the work City Planning & sectors, as a method to reduce commercial Public Works vehicle miles traveled. Department During operation Less than Significant AQ-5 The Project operator shall encourage the use Project Applicant/ of low emission vehicles to reduce the Contractor reliance on gasoline or diesel fuel by providing charging stations and designated parking for emissions free vehicles. Mitigation Measures to Reduce VOCs from Consumer Products: AQ-6 The Project operator shall utilize "Super - Compliant" or otherwise non -aerosol dispersal/application methods (and/or low VOC products) in all Commercial Buildings including the Hotel, Spa and Golf Training Travertine Final EIR 4-4 July 2024 592 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Facility. This includes but is not limited to: air fresheners, cooking spray, floor maintenance products, furniture maintenance products, degreaser, oven cleaners, toilet care products. Project operators can refer to the CARB Consumer Product Program web site for the most current information. AQ-7 The Project operator shall utilize low VOC products to the greatest degree possible on all landscape maintenance activities associated with the Commercial Buildings, Golf Training grounds and Common Landscape Areas. These shall be applied with non -aerosol measures where possible. Applicable products include insecticides, pesticides, pool/spa disinfectants, grill cleaners. Project operators can refer to the CARB Consumer Product Program web site for the most current information. AQ-8 The Project operator shall require all commercial products to be diluted as directed. AQ-9 The Project operator shall use low -solvent or solvent -free paints for all commercial buildings and common area monumentation or walls (including repairs.) AQ-10 The Project operator shall minimize the use of pesticides with high organic solvent contents, and/or the use of emulsions and water -based formulations. Section 4.3, Biological 11310-1 Because USFWS has determined that fences Resources could block wildlife movement, fences will USFWS Prior to issuance Less than of permit Significant not be used as an initial deterrent to Travertine Final EIR 4-5 July 2024 593 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM a. Substantial adverse unauthorized access; however, a fencing City Planning effect on any contingency plan will be developed to address Department candidate, sensitive or any future indirect Project impacts. Following special status species the formation of the HOA and before the Project Applicant/ in local or regional completion of the habitat interface golf Developer plans, policies, or course, the Project applicant will establish a regulations, or by the three -person committee, with California Department representatives from USFWS, CDFW, and the of Fish and Game or HOA to monitor and assess the future need US Fish and Wildlife for a buffer fence. The committee will be Service charged with assessing whether a future fence is needed based on whether a fence is needed to prevent human access to sheep habitat or keep bighorn sheep off the project site. In addition, if USFWS finds evidence that a fence is necessary to prevent human access to prevent human access to sheep habitat or keep bighorn sheep off the project site, USFWS may require the construction of the fence at its sole discretion. To avoid complications in the installation of a future fence, the Project applicant would be required to provide wildlife fence easements at the exterior boundary of the golf course or trail corridor, whichever is the outer most perimeter of the project, create an HOA as the legally responsible party for fence installation, and provide or identify a dedicated source of funds to construct the fence prior to recording the first final map. Consistent with the terms of the Project Biological Opinion, upon either a three - person committee or USFWS's unilateral determination that a fence is necessary based on the criteria specified in the Biological Travertine Final EIR 4-6 July 2024 594 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Opinion, an 8-foot-tall wildlife fence constructed of tubular steel and painted to blend in with the desert environment shall be installed where the Project interfaces with Coral Mountain along the northern boundary and extend southward along the western and southern boundary of proposed development to preclude PBS from entering the Project and humans from entering the sheep habitat. The fence shall extend to where Avenue 62 intersects with the eastern Project boundary. 11310-2 All lighting located within the development City Planning footprint shall conform with the Commission/City Less than requirements outlined in the Travertine Council Prior to approval Significant Specific Plan and the MSHCP. Project Applicant 113I0-3 Where the Project is located adjacent to the SRSJM Conservation Area along its western edge, a minimum buffer of 74 feet shall be incorporated between SRSJM undeveloped City Planning native desert areas and private homeowner Commission/City Less than parcels and public gathering areas. Each Council Prior to approval Significant private homeowner parcel along this western edge shall have fencing at the top of slope Project Applicant with Lexan panels to dampen noise to an appropriate level. 11310-4 All plant species identified as invasive by the CVMSHP, or that are known to be toxic to PBS, will be prohibited from inclusion in Project City Planning landscaping including areas adjacent to Commission/City Prior to approval Less than proposed open space. Prior to site Council of landscape Significant disturbance a Project -specific list of plan prohibited plant species will be prepared by a Project Applicant qualified biologist for use in developing the Project Landscape Plan. This will include Travertine Final EIR 4-7 July 2024 595 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM plants identified as invasive by the California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and the CVMSHCP. The City shall review the landscape palette prior to planting. B10-5 The final design and location of natural trails will be approved by the USFWS and the City to minimize disturbance to PBS. Unauthorized trails currently in use on the Property will be closed to minimize impacts to bighorn sheep and replaced with the trail proposed as part of the Project. The nature trail will be closed USFWS to equestrian and bicycle use. Other than this trail, no additional trails would be proposed City Planning or allowed as part of the Project. To restrict Commission/City Final Design Less than human access to surrounding hills, including: Council Significant (a) placement of "no trespass" signs at legally enforceable intervals along the trail and Project Applicant habitat/development interface, with legally enforceable language; (b) development of CC&Rs and educational materials that explain to residents and members the ecology of bighorn sheep and the rules concerning unauthorized hiking into sheep habitat. B10-6 Project proponent shall permanently protect 19.7 acres in Section 5 as bighorn sheep habitat. Prior to recording the first final map, Project proponent also has committed to City Planning acquire an additional approximately 100 Commission/City Prior to acres of bighorn sheep habitat in Section 5 Council recording the g Less than that also are strategically located to fragment first final map Significant larger blocks of land into smaller units with Project Applicant reduced development potential. All lands proposed for conservation in Section 5 will be approved by the Service and protected in perpetuity consistent with California Civil Travertine Final EIR July 2024 596 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Code Section 815, et seq. For more detail, please refer to the Section 5 Addendum to the Travertine Biological Assessment. BIO-7 Project proponent shall establish a $500,000 endowment with the Center for Natural Lands Management (CNLM) to be managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to assist with the long-term management of bighorn sheep. Of CNLM this total, $100,000 will be provided upon issuance of the first grading permit, with the USFWS Prior to approval Less than balance of $400,000 paid in installments of Significant $100,000 per year over the succeeding four Project Applicant years. Long-term maintenance and monitoring activities shall be outlined in a long-term management plan and submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval. 11310-8 Project proponent shall provide an additional $100,000 to the CNLM endowment above to support the gathering of information on the CNLM Less than effects of the regional trails system on Prior to approval Significant bighorn sheep, including trails in and around Project Applicant the Project site. Travertine Final EIR 4-9 July 2024 597 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BIO-9 The Jefferson Street extension through Section 32 will be constructed using active and passive design features to prevent public roadside parking and foot access into bighorn sheep habitat (e.g., boulders, k-rail, berm, narrow road shoulder, bar ditch, and restrictive signage), subject to review and approval by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. BIO-10 Within the project boundary, approximately 100 yards at the west end of the newly constructed Jefferson Street Loop in the USFWS southwest comer of Section 33, where it Prior to approval Less than connects with the Avenue 62 alignment, will Project Significant be left as undeveloped desert. The distance in Applicant/Developer some places will be less than 100 yards but other features such as "manufactured slopes" and "property fences" will be used, as shown in Figure 4 — BO Conservation Measure #7 of the Project Biological Opinion. This design feature, in combination with enhanced native landscaping, will discourage unauthorized vehicle access into bighorn sheep habitat in Section 5 adjacent to the Travertine project boundary. City Planning BIO-11 No exotic plants known to be toxic to PBS, or Commission/City invasive in desert environments, will be used Council Prior to approval Less than in project landscaping. Significant Project Applicant/Developer City Planning BIO-12 The Project shall not provide direct public Commission/City access from internal streets to hillside sheep Council Prior to approval Less than habitat. Significant Project Travertine Final EIR 4-10 July 2024 598 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Applicant/Developer City Planning Commission/City BIO-13 The Project Nature Trail will form the southern Council Less than and western perimeters of the Project. Prior to approval Significant Project Applicant/Developer City Planning BIO-14 To deter bighorn sheep access to the project Commission/City site, natural landscaping and property fences Council Less than around residential areas would reduce noise, Prior to approval Significant light, and visual impacts on surrounding hills. Project Applicant/Developer BIO-15 The best management practices shall be used to preclude the establishment of potential City Planning disease vectors at open water features (i.e., Commission/City water bodies will be designed with steep, Council Prior to approval Less than unvegetated slopes and deep enough water Significant to prevent establishment of emergent Project wetland vegetation). Applicant/Developer BIO-16 CC&R's and Project Specific Plan conditions shall prohibit activities that emit noise above City Planning specified levels (not to exceed 60 dB(A) for Commission/City sensitive receptors or 75 dB(A) for Council Less than nonresidential receptors (per City Ordinance p (p y Prior to approval Significant 9.100.210 Noise Control). For example, only Project quiet electric golf carts will be used for service Applicant/Developer and maintenance. City Planning BIO-17 Outdoor lighting will be down -shielded and Commission/City directed away from the hillsides in Council Prior to approval Less than accordance with the City municipal code. Significant Project Applicant/Developer Travertine Final EIR 4-11 July 2024 599 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BIO-18 To increase public awareness regarding the sensitivity of PBS in the region, educational materials will be provided to homeowners and made available to users of the public facilities within the Travertine development. This material will be prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and CDFW. In addition, the Project proponent will provide within the project an area dedicated as an interpretive center concerning the bighorn sheep. City Planning Commission/City Council Project Applicant/Developer During operation Less than Significant BIO-19 The two water reservoirs will be constructed of steel or concrete and buried underground City Planning to the extent possible, or screened by Commission/City landscaped berms. Any tank appurtenances Council (e.g., valves) remaining above -ground will be Prior to approval Less than painted with non -reflective paint colored to CVWD Significant blend with the surrounding habitat and to prevent light from being reflected toward Project sheep habitat in the Santa Rosa Mountains. Applicant/Developer BIO-20 Dogs and other pets are not allowed within the National Monument and appropriate signage at the designated trailhead parking areas and any other access points will be installed to prohibit dogs along the Nature Trail. CC&Rs City Planning and club rules will require pets to remain on a Commission/City leash while outside enclosed areas, and will Council Less than prohibit pets from entering the hills at any Prior to approval Significant time. The Project proponent will consult with USFWS during the drafting of Rules & Project Applicant/Developer Regulations concerning appropriate rules and regulations to protect bighorn sheep. The Master Declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions will incorporate rules and regulations specifically addressing bighorn Travertine Final EIR 4-12 July 2024 .11 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM sheep, which rules and regulations may be modified, amended or deleted only with the express written consent of USFWS. Violators of CC&Rs and club rules will be subject to increasingly severe penalties. Compliance with the local "leash law" will also be enforced pursuant to City ordinance and the project's Specific Plan conditions." A variety of other measures will be implemented to restrict human access to surrounding hills, including training personnel to monitor and control human access to adjacent hills. City Planning BIO-21 The acreage of the Project Site that is located Commission/City within the MSHCP Conservation Area shall be Council Prior to approval Less than dedicated to Conservation in perpetuity. Significant Project Applicant/Developer BIO-22 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent will provide a no -interest City Planning $2,000,000 loan to the CVCC or its designee Commission/City upon mutually agreeable terms to acquire Council essential bighorn sheep habitat in the Prior to the Less than project area. This provision may be revised CVCC/Wildlife issuance of Significant or substituted for in a manner of equal or Agencies grading permits greater benefit to the Plan upon mutual agreement of CVCC, the Wildlife Agencies, Project and the Project proponent. Applicant/Developer BIO-23 A Qualified Biologist will prepare and present Qualified Biologist to each employee (including temporary, contractors, and subcontractors) a Worker City Planning Prior to grading Less than Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) Commission/City or construction prior to the worker's initiation of work on the Council activities Significant Project site. Workers shall also be advised by the Qualified Biologist of the special -status Project Travertine Final EIR 4-13 July 2024 601 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM wildlife species in the Project site, the steps to Applicant/Developer avoid impacts to the species and the potential penalties for taking such species. At a minimum, the WEAP will include the following information: occurrence of the listed and sensitive species in the area, their general ecology, sensitivity of the species to human activities, legal protection afforded to these species, penalties for violations of federal and State laws, reporting requirements, and Project features and mitigation measures designed to reduce the impacts to these species and promote continued successful occupation of habitats within the Project area. Included in this WEAP will be color photographs of the listed species, which will be shown to the employees. Following the WEAP, the photographs will be posted in the contractor and resident engineer office, where they will remain through the duration of the Project. The contractor, resident engineer, and the Qualified Biologist will be responsible for ensuring that employees are aware of the listed species and observe reporting and mitigation and avoidance requirements. A record of all trained personnel will be kept with the construction foreman onsite. If new construction personnel are added to the project, the construction foreman will ensure that new personnel receive WEAP training before they start working. BIO-24 Prior to issuance of grading permit, a qualified Qualified Biologist prior to issuance Less than biologist will be designated to monitor of grading permit Significant construction activities and advise City Planning Travertine Final EIR 4-14 July 2024 .li 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM construction personnel of the sensitive Commission/City biological resources on site that may be Council impacted by, and conversely, that must be avoided during site development. A biological Project monitor will be on site to monitor avoidance Applicant/Developer activities and to monitor all clearing and grubbing activities, as well as grading, excavation, and/or other ground -disturbing activities in jurisdictional areas to ensure that impacts do not exceed the limits of grading and to minimize the likelihood of inadvertent impacts on special -status species. The monitor will flush avian species and remove and relocate, if possible, non -avian species to a safe location outside of the immediate construction zone (generally 1,000 feet or more onto public lands, when feasible). Where appropriate, the biological monitor will mark/flag the limits of environmental sensitive areas (ESAs) to restrict project activities near the areas. These restricted areas will be monitored to protect the species during construction. The biological monitor will ensure that all biological mitigation measures, BMPs, avoidance and protection measures described in the relevant project permits, approvals, licenses, and environmental reports, and CEQA documents, are in place and are adhered to. Monitoring will cease when the sensitive habitats and jurisdictional areas have been cleared or impacted. The biological monitor will ensure that construction activities will maintain measures to prevent accidental trapping of wildlife into Travertine Final EIR 4-15 July 2024 603 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM excavated areas and inspect excavated areas daily to detect the presence of trapped wildlife. All deep or steep -walled excavated areas should be covered with plywood or other weight bearing material and will be furnished with escape ramps at a 3:1 slope or are surrounded with exclusionary fencing in order to prevent wildlife from entering them. Trapped wildlife should be relocated out of harm's way to a suitable habitat outside of the project area. The biological monitor will have the authority to temporarily halt all construction activities and all non -emergency actions if ESAs and special -status species are identified and will be directly impacted. The monitor will notify the appropriate resource agency and consult if needed. If needed, and if possible, the biological monitor will relocate the individual outside of the work area where it will not be harmed. Work can continue at the location if the project proponent and the consulted resource agency determine that the activity will not result in impacts on the species. All biological monitor observations of special - status species will be documented and mapped in monitoring logs. Monitoring logs will be completed for each day of monitoring. All special -status species recordings will be submitted to the CNDDB. The biological monitors will be responsible for documenting compliance with avoidance measures, the results of the surveys and the ongoing monitoring, and will provide a copy of the monitoring reports for impact areas to Travertine Final EIR 4-16 July 2024 604 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM the County EPD and any permitting agencies that require reporting. The appropriate agencies will be notified if a dead or injured protected species is located within the project site. Written notification will be made within 15 days of the date and time of the finding or incident (if known) and will include: location of the carcass, a photograph, cause of death (if known), and other pertinent information. BIO-25 Prior to issuance of grading permits and commencement of any ground -disturbing activities or vegetation removal the following measures would be implemented to avoid impacts on ESAs, surrounding habitats, and special status species and wildlife: a. Project footprint would be set at the minimum size to accomplish necessary Prior to issuance work, and the footprint will be of a Qualified Biologist of grading permit size/area no greater than is identified in and the CEQA documentation, to minimize City Planning commencement impacts on sensitive biological Commission/City of any ground Less than resources. Council disturbing Significant b. Specifications for the project boundary, Project activities or limits of grading, project related parking, Applicant/Developer vegetation storage areas, laydown sites, and removal equipment storage areas would be mapped and clearly marked in the field with temporary fencing, signs, stakes, flags, rope, cord, or other appropriate markers. All markers would be maintained until the completion of activities in that area. Travertine Final EIR 4-17 July 2024 605 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM c. To minimize the amount of disturbance, the construction/laydown activities, parking, staging, storage, spoil management, and equipment access will be restricted to designated areas. Designated areas will comprise existing disturbed areas (parking lots, access roads, graded areas, etc.) to the extent possible. d. Designated staging areas will be enclosed with temporary security fencing. All staging areas will comply with conditions in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP), which provides BMPs to avoid or mitigate erosion impacts during construction. e. Project -related work limits would be defined and work crews would be restricted to designated work areas. Disturbance beyond the actual construction zone will be prohibited without site -specific surveys. If sensitive biological resources are detected in an area to be impacted, then appropriate measures would be implemented to avoid impacts (i.e., flag and avoid, erect orange construction fencing, biological monitor present during work, etc.). However, if avoidance is not possible and the sensitive biological resources would be directly impacted by project activities, the biologist would mark and/or stake the site(s) and map the individuals on an aerial map and with a Travertine Final EIR 4-18 July 2024 .1. 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. The biologist would then contact the appropriate resource agencies to develop additional avoidance, minimization and/or mitigation measures prior to commencing project activities. f. ESAs would be identified, mapped, clearly marked in the field, and avoided to the maximum extent practicable in order to avoid and minimize impacts on sensitive biological resources. g. Existing roads and trails would be utilized wherever possible to avoid unnecessary impacts. Project related vehicle traffic would be restricted to established roads, staging areas, and parking areas. Travel outside construction zones will be prohibited. h. Monitoring would occur periodically during the length of construction activities to ensure project limits, designated areas (parking, storage, etc.), and ESAs are still clearly marked. L Signs will be installed on boundaries of the Project Site and other strategic locations to notify the public of the sensitive biological resources identified onsite and prohibit entry into key high value habitat areas. Travertine Final EIR 4-19 July 2024 607 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BIO-26 Prior to construction, the construction area and adjacent habitat within 500 feet of the construction area, or to the edge of the property if less than 500 feet, will be surveyed by a Qualified Biologist for burrows that could be used by burrowing owl. Two (2) surveys will be conducted, with one survey to be conducted between 14 and 30 days prior to site disturbance, and a second survey to be conducted within 24 hours of site disturbance, following methods described in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game 2012). If a burrow is located, the Qualified Prior to issuance Biologist will determine if an owl is present in Qualified Biologist of grading permit the burrow. If the burrow is determined to be and occupied, the burrow will be flagged and a City Planning commencement 160-foot buffer during the non -breeding Commission/City of any ground Less than season and a 250-foot buffer during the Council disturbing Significant breeding season, or a buffer to the edge of activities or the property boundary if less than 500 feet, Project vegetation will be established around the burrow. The Applicant/Developer removal buffer will be staked and flagged. No construction will be permitted within the buffer until the young are no longer dependent on the burrow. If the burrow is unoccupied, the burrow will be made inaccessible to burrowing owls, and construction activities may proceed. If either a nesting or escape burrow is occupied, burrowing owls shall be relocated pursuant to accepted protocols and in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies (CDFW and USFWS). A burrow is assumed occupied if records indicate that, based on surveys conducted Travertine Final EIR 4-20 July 2024 .1: 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM following protocol, at least one burrowing owl has been observed occupying a burrow on site during the past three years. If there are no records for the site, surveys must be conducted to determine, prior to construction, if burrowing owls are present. Determination of the appropriate method of relocation, such as eviction/passive relocation or active relocation, shall be based on the specific site conditions (e.g., distance to nearest suitable habitat and presence of burrows within that habitat) in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. Active relocation and eviction/passive relocation require the preservation and maintenance of suitable burrowing owl habitat determined through coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. BIO-27 Prior to the start of construction activities in modeled Le Conte's thrasher habitat in the SRSJM Conservation Area, surveys will be Conducted by a Qualified Biologist on the construction site and within 500 feet of the Qualified Biologist construction site, or to the property boundary if less than 500 feet. If nesting Le Conte's City Planning Prior to the start thrashers are found, a 500-foot buffer, or to Commission/City of construction Less than the property boundary if less than 500 feet, Council activities during Significant will be established around the nest site. The nesting season buffer will be staked and flagged. No Project construction will be permitted within the Applicant/Developer buffer during the breeding season (January 15 through June 15) or until the young have fledged. BIO-28 Vegetation clearing shall be conducted outside Qualified Avian Outside of Less than of the peak nesting season, which is generally Biologist nesting season Significant identified as February 1 through August 31, to Travertine Final EIR 4-21 July 2024 .1• 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM the greatest extent feasible. Regardless of the City Planning time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be Commission/City performed by a qualified avian biologist no Council more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Pre- Project construction surveys shall focus on both Applicant/Developer direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre - construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. BIO-29 Drainage and Toxics: Project stormwater runoff City Planning Prior to approval Less than will be conveyed eastward toward the Dike 4 Commission/City of grading plans Significant Travertine Final EIR 4-22 July 2024 610 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM impound and away from Project surrounding open space, and SRSJM Conservation Area. Stormwater retention basins are designed to provide requisite water quality treatment, including bio-remediation. Subsequent engineering will include preparation of a SWPPP that will ensure against increased runoff and protect water quality during and post -construction. Council Project Applicant/Developer BIO-30 Artificial Lighting: Night lighting shall be directed away from adjacent open space and SRSJM Conservation Area to protect wildlife from direct night lighting. Light fixtures adjacent to open space will be shielded and utilize low intensity lighting. No nighttime lighting will be utilized on the nature trail and a curfew will be established for trail use from sunrise to sunset. Notice of the trail curfew will be posted at each trail entry point. If night lighting is required during construction, City Planning shielding shall be incorporated to ensure Commission/City ambient lighting adjacent conservation lands Council Prior to approval Less than are not increased. of Architectural Significant Throughout construction and the lifetime Project Review operations of the Project, the City and Project Applicant/Developer proponent shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area, including the selected offsite field utilities parcel, and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result Travertine Final EIR 4-23 July 2024 611 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City and Project proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. City Planning BIO-31 Noise: The Project will incorporate setbacks, as Commission/City specified in the Specific Plan to minimize the Council Prior to approval Less than effects of noise on wildlife. of Tract Map Significant Project Applicant/Developer BIO-32 Unauthorized Access: The Project will City Planning incorporate signage, fencing, gates, and Commission/City similar measures and barriers to inform the Council Prior to approval Less than hiking public and to avoid or minimize of Architectural Significant unauthorized access to adjacent open space Project 1 Review lands. Applicant/Developer Travertine Final EIR 4-24 July 2024 612 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BIO-33 California Desert Native Plants Act: The applicant will collect California Desert Native Plan Act protected plants, including California barrel cactus (Ferocactus cylindraceus), Gander's buckhorn cholla (Cylindropuntia Riverside County ganderi), Englemann's hedgehog cactus Agriculture (Echinocereus engelmannii), cottontop cactus Commissioner (Echinocactus polycephalus), beavertail Prior to and cactus (Opuntia basilaris), branched pencil City Planning during collection Less than cholla (Cylindropuntia ramossissima), ocotillo Commission/City of California Significant (Fouquieria splendens), catclaw (Acacia Council Native plants greggii), blue paloverde (Parkinsonia florida), and smoke tree (Psorothamnus spinosus) and Project prioritize reuse of plant materials onsite. A Applicant/Developer permit from the Agriculture Commissioner of the County of Riverside shall be obtained prior to collection and relocation of these species. BIO-34 A general biological field survey to document existing conditions and the suitability of habitats within the utility field parcels to support special -status wildlife species such as Prior to any burrowing owl, which could potentially occur ground on -site. Regardless of focused surveyfindings, Qualified Biologist disturbance, one if suitable habitat for burrowing owl is no less than 14 present, two (2) separate preconstruction City Planning days prior to Less than surveys are required prior to any ground Department disturbance, and Significant disturbance, one no less than 14 days prior to Project Applicant/ the other within disturbance, and the other within 24 hours Developer 24 hours prior to prior to ground disturbance. ground Should take of burrowing owl be expected, a disturbance relocation plan and extensive coordination to move animals offsite can be expected. BIO-35: Le Conte's Thrasher. Le Conte's thrasher Qualified Avian Prior to Less than focused surveys shall be performed by a Biologist vegetation Significant Travertine Final EIR 4-25 July 2024 613 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM qualified avian biologist prior to vegetation removal or removal or ground -disturbing activities City Planning ground following methods outlined on pages 6-8 of Department disturbance the LeConte's Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei) Status and Nest Site Requirements in the Project Applicant/ Coachella Valley (Hargrove, L. P. et al. 20204), Developer including the broadcast of song and calls by a qualified avian biologist with an appropriate permit. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, the qualified biologist shall inform CDFW and shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. BIO-36: Burrowing Owl Avoidance: No less than 60 Qualified Biologist days prior to the start of Project -related No less than 60 activities, a burrowing owl habitat City Planning days prior to the Less than assessment shall be conducted within the Department start of Project- Significant Project site and surrounding area, including Project Applicant/ related activities Travertine Final EIR 4-26 July 2024 614 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM the selected off -site utility field parcel, by a Developer qualified biologist according to the specifications of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Department of Fish and Game, March 2012 or most recent version). Suitable habitat for burrowing owl has been identified within the Project site; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Focused burrowing owl surveys shall also be conducted in all areas identified through a habitat assessment as being suitable habitat for burrowing owls at the selected off -site utility field parcel. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project proponent shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures if avoidance is proposed. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe minimization and Travertine Final EIR 4-27 July 2024 615 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. The Project proponent shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW and USFWS review and approval. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. BIO-37: All operation and maintenance activities CVWD During operation Less than relating to the Project's water tank facilities of water tanks Significant Travertine Final EIR 4-28 July 2024 616 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM will be designed and conducted in a manner City Planning consistent with the applicable mitigation Department measures in the 2015 Operations and Maintenance Manual for Coachella Valley Project Applicant/ Water District Covered Activities and Facilities Developer Within Conservation Areas. Avoidance and minimization measures include, but are not limited to: (i) the number of access routes, number and size of staging areas, and the total area of any operations and maintenance activities shall be limited to the minimum necessary to achieve the project goal; (ii) routes and boundaries outside the normal access roads shall be clearly delineated through fencing or flagging; (iii) if any CVWD employee inadvertently impacts a listed species or sensitive habitat during operations and maintenance activities, CVWD shall report the activity within 24 hours to CDFW. b. Have a Substantial BIO-38 Prior to the issuance of grading or building Adverse Effect on permits for the project, and prior to initiating any Riparian Habitat any work that may impact jurisdictional or Other Sensitive waters identified in the Travertine Project Natural Community Biological Resources Assessment, the Project- City Planning Identified in Local or specific Delineation of State and Federal Department Prior to issuance Regional Plans, Jurisdictional Waters, Michael Baker of grading or Policies, Regulations International, and the off -site utility field Project Applicant/ building Less than or by the California assessment prepared by Michael Baker Developer p permits/initiating Significant Department of Fish International, dated March 2022, June 2021, any work and Wildlife Service and June 2022, respectively, the Project CDFW proponent shall provide notice to CDFW and obtain a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement as required pursuant to California Fish and Game Code sections 1602-1616. Travertine Final EIR 4-29 July 2024 617 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BIO-39 Impacts to CDFW jurisdictional waters shall be mitigated pursuant to a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) which will be prepared to identify specific on -site and/or off -site mitigation activities that will be implemented to compensate for unavoidable impacts to CDFW jurisdictional areas. The HMMP will identify the mitigation program coordinated with and approved by CDFW, set mitigation success criteria, and guide a five- year qualitative and quantitative mitigation City Planning monitoring program to track mitigation Department Prior to issuance success. Annual reports will be submitted to of grading or CDFW each year for five years, summarizing Project Applicant/ building Less than mitigation performance against the success Developer p permits/initiating Significant criteria. Impacts to non -riparian waters will any work be mitigated at a minimum 1:1 ratio. Impacts CDFW to riparian vegetation will be mitigated at a minimum 2:1 ratio. The HMMP will identify the mitigation program coordinated with and approved by CDFW, set mitigation success criteria, and guide a five-year qualitative and quantitative mitigation monitoring program to track mitigation success. Annual reports will be submitted to CDFW each year for five years, summarizing mitigation performance against the success criteria. BIO-40 Prior to construction of the Project, including Regulatory the offsite utility field, a jurisdictional Specialist delineation should be conducted to determine the presence or absence and City Planning Prior to Less than potential regulatory status of any Department construction Significant jurisdictional features should it be determined they may be impacted by Project Applicant/ installation of water wells and the electric Developer Travertine Final EIR 4-30 July 2024 618 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM power substation within a proposed impact area. If Impacts to jurisdictional features are identified, the Project proponent shall comply with the regulatory requirements of the USACE, RWQCB and CDFW, as applicable, regarding required regulatory permits, including a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, Section 404 Permit, Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Project proponent shall implement the recommendations of the Project Drainage Study (DEIR, Appendix J.3) and in accordance with the recommendations of the Project Drainage Plan prior to issuance of a grading permit obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Project Proponent shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 4.4 Cultural Resources CR-1 Prior to any ground -disturbing activities, the Qualified Project applicant shall retain a qualified Archaeologist a. Adverse change to archaeologist, defined as an archaeologist Prior to any Historical Resources that meets the Secretary of Interior's City Planning ground- Less than b. Adverse change to Standards for professional archaeology, to Department disturbing Significant Archaeological carry out all mitigation measures related to activities Resources cultural resources. Tribal monitoring of site Project Applicant/ disturbance will also be accommodated. Developer CR-2 The Project applicant shall assign a Compliance Officer Prior to any compliance officer for the Project to ensure City Planning ground- Less than mitigation measures are in place and followed disturbing Significant for the duration of Project construction. The Department activities Travertine Final EIR 4-31 July 2024 619 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM compliance officer should prepare a monthly compliance report for distribution to the City, BOR, BLM, and interested Native American groups. The compliance officer may be the same person as the Project archaeologist or may be another qualified individual designated by the Project applicant. Project Applicant/ Developer CR-3 Prior to the commencement of ground disturbance, a Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (Monitoring Plan) shall be prepared. The Monitoring Plan shall include, but not be limited to: principles and procedures for the identification of cultural resources monitoring protocols consistent with CR-1, CR-2 and CR-7 for Qualified ground -disturbing activities, a worker training Archaeologist program consistent with CR-6, and discovery Prior to the and processing protocols for inadvertent City Planning commencement Less than discoveries of cultural resources consistent Department of ground Significant with CR-7 and CR-8. The plan shall detail disturbance protocols for determining circumstances in Project Applicant/ which additional or reduced levels of Developer monitoring (e.g., spot checking) may be appropriate. Fencing with a buffer shall be placed around resources to be avoided. The Monitoring Plan shall also establish a protocol for communicating with the lead agencies and interested Native American parties. CR-4 Prior to ground -disturbing activities in any Qualified areas outside the APE described in the Project Archaeologist Prior to any EIR, Exhibit 4.5-1, including but not limited to ground- Less than locations proposed for the off -site utility field, City Planning disturbing Significant a supplemental study including an updated Department records search at the EIC, updated Sacred activities Lands File search, and pedestrian survey, shall Project Applicant/ Travertine Final EIR 4-32 July 2024 620 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM be conducted. If resources are identified and cannot be avoided, they shall be assessed for their eligibility for the NRHP and CRHR. Avoidance and minimization measures identified as a result of the study shall be incorporated into the Monitoring Plan. Developer CR-5 In the event of unanticipated discovery of NRHP- and CRHR-eligible resources within the APE or the off -site utility field, where operationally feasible, such resources shall be protected from direct project impacts by project redesign (i.e., relocation of the ground City Planning disturbance, ancillary facilities, or temporary Department During any facilities or work areas). Avoidance ground- Less than mechanisms shall include temporary fencing Project Applicant/ disturbing Significant and designation of such areas as Developer activities environmentally sensitive areas (ESAs) for the duration of the proposed Project. ESAs shall include the boundary of each historic property plus a 30-meter (98-foot) buffer around the resource. CR-6 Prior to the commencement of ground - disturbing activities, typically at the Project kick-off, the qualified archaeologist or their designee will provide cultural sensitivity Qualified training to construction crews. The training Archaeologist will provide information on signs of potential Prior to any cultural resources, regulatory requirements City Planning ground- Less than for the protection of cultural resources and Department disturbing Significant the proper procedures to follow should activities unanticipated cultural resources discoveries Project Applicant/ be made during construction. Workers will be Developer provided contact information and protocols to follow if inadvertent discoveries are made. Workers will be shown examples of the types Travertine Final EIR 4-33 July 2024 621 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM of tribal cultural resources that might be encountered and that would require notification of the project archaeologist. The Project archaeologist shall create a training video, PowerPoint presentation, or printed literature that can be shown to new workers and contractors for continuous training throughout the life of the Project. CR-7 Prior to ground disturbance, an archaeological monitor, working under the supervision of the qualified archaeologist, and Native American monitors from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, shall be retained to monitor ground -disturbing activities. Monitoring will take place within or near ESAs or in other areas agreed upon by Qualified the archaeologist, City, and Native American Archaeologist monitor, and as identified in the Monitoring Plan. Monitoring activities will include Native American examining the excavation of native soils as Monitors Prior to any ground- Less than well as the disposal of spoils in certain areas. The duration, timing and location of the City Planning disturbing Significant monitoring shall be determined by the City in Department activities consultation with the qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors as outlined in Project Applicant/ the Monitoring Plan. Should buried cultural Developer deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer. Additionally, fencing with a buffer Travertine Final EIR 4-34 July 2024 622 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM shall be required around resources to be avoided. CR-8 In the event that cultural resources are exposed during excavation, work in the immediate vicinity of the find must stop until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find. Ground -disturbing activities may continue in other areas. For discoveries located outside of BLM land, if the City determines, in consideration of the subsequent analysis by the qualified archaeologist, that the resource is a protected resource under CEQA (Section 15064.5f; PRC 21082) additional work such as testing or data Qualified recovery may be warranted prior to Archaeologist resumption of ground -disturbing activity in Prior to any the location of discovery. For discoveries City Planning ground- Less than located on BLM-land, if the BLM determines, Department disturbing Significant in consideration of the subsequent analysis by activities the qualified archaeologist, that the resource Project Applicant/ is protected under Section 106 of the NHPA, Developer additional work such as testing or data recovery may be warranted prior to resumption of ground -disturbing activity in the location of discovery. Should any tribal cultural resources be encountered, additional consultation with California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)—listed tribal groups should be conducted in coordination with the City and/or with the BLM and BOR if the discovery occurs on federal lands. c. Disturb human CR-9 If human remains are encountered, pursuant During any remains to State of California Health and Safety Code County Coroner ground- Less than Section 7050.5, no further disturbance shall disturbing Significant occur until the Riverside County Coroner has activities Travertine Final EIR 4-35 July 2024 623 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM made a determination of origin and City Planning disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. Department The Riverside County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. Additional Project Applicant/ procedures for responding to the Developer unanticipated discovery of human remains are outlined below. Modern Remains If the Coroner's Office determines the remains are of modern origin, the appropriate law enforcement officials will be called by the Coroner and conduct the required procedures. Work will not resume until law enforcement has released the area. Archaeological Remains If the remains are determined to be archaeological in origin, the appropriate protocol is determined by whether the discovery site is located on federally or non - federally owned or managed lands. Remains Discovered on Federally Owned or Managed Lands After the Coroner has determined that the remains are archaeological or historic in age, the appropriate BLM Palm Springs Field Office or BOR archaeologist must be called. The archaeologist will initiate the proper procedures under the Archaeological Resources Protection Act and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). If the remains can be determined to be Native American, the steps as outlined in NAGPRA, 43 Code of Federal Travertine Final EIR 4-36 July 2024 624 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Regulations [CFR] 10.6 Inadvertent discoveries, must be followed. Resumption of Activity: The activity that resulted in the discovery of human remains on federal lands may resume after a written, binding agreement is executed between the BLM or BOR and federally recognized affiliated Indian Tribe(s) that adopts a recovery plan for the excavation or removal of the human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony following 43 CFR Section 10.3(b)(1) of these regulations. The disposition of all human remains and NAGPRA items shall be carried out following 43 CFR 10.6. Remains Discovered on Non -Federally Owned/Managed Lands After the Coroner has determined the remains on non -federally owned or managed lands are archaeological, the Coroner will make recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the remains to the person responsible for the excavation or discovery, or to his or her authorized representative. If the Coroner believes the remains to be those of a Native American, he/she shall contact the California NAHC by telephone within 24 hours. The NAHC will notify the person it believes to be the most likely descendant (MLD) of the remains. The MLD has 48 hours after accessing the site of the discovery to make recommendations to the landowner for treatment or disposition of the human remains. If the MLD does not make recommendations within 48 hours, the Travertine Final EIR 4-37 July 2024 625 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM landowner shall reinter the remains in an area of the property secure from further disturbance. If the landowner does not accept the descendant's recommendations, the owner or the descendent may request mediation by the NAHC Section 4.6, Geology and Soils GEO-1 The Project developer shall implement the seismic design criteria and parameters, in a. Expose people or accordance with ASCE 7-16 and 2019 CBC, as set forth in the Project geotechnical City Engineering structures to evaluation. Department potential substantial Less than adverse effects GEO-2 The design of foundation and slabs (including Project Applicant/ During... Significant involving: bearing pressure recommendations) shall be Developer ii. Strong seismic in conformance with the recommendations of ground shaking the Project structural engineer and as set d. located on expansive forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. soil iii. Seismic -related GEO-3 Grading and excavations shall be performed ground failure, in accordance with the City of La Quinta Code including and regulations and the General Earthwork liquefaction and Grading Specifications set forth in the c. Located on an Geotechnical Evaluation. Clearing and Project Geologist Unstable Geologic grubbing of the site shall include removal of Unit any pavement or concrete, turf, landscaping, City Engineering miscellaneous trash and debris, and disposal Department During grading Less than of deleterious material offsite. The soil and excavating Significant engineering properties of imported soil (if Project Applicant/ any) shall be evaluated and certified by the Developer Project geologist for use at the development site. GEO-4 Unsuitable earth materials shall be removed prior to placement of compacted fill. Travertine Final EIR 4-38 July 2024 626 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Unsuitable materials at the site include undocumented fills and weathered alluvial fan deposits as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation and as otherwise directed by the Project geologist. Excavation and grading to carry Project - serving roadways over the Dike No. 4 levee for the proposed Avenue 62 and Madison Street extensions, as well the Jefferson Street extension over the Dike No. 2 levee, should bench into competent existing fills on the sides with minimal removals on the top (1 to 2 feet). Grading on the levee fill shall be performed under the direction and concurrence of the US Bureau of Reclamation and CVWD. GEO-5 Where project soils require, they shall be overexcavated during grading to be replaced with compacted fill, as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. The proposed grading is anticipated to expose cut and fill transitions at finish grade. Shallow fill areas and cut portions of lots should be overexcavated and replaced with compacted fill to provide a minimum of 4 feet of uniform fill cap over each lot. Streets should be overexcavated 2 feet below subgrade to provide uniform fill below the pavement section. Alternatively, and as recommended by the Project geologist, streets may be overexcavated 2 feet below the deepest utility to reduce the amount of oversize materials encountered and facilitate utility excavation/installation. Travertine Final EIR 4-39 July 2024 627 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM iv. landslides GEO-4 Unsuitable earth materials shall be removed prior to placement of compacted fill. Unsuitable materials at the site include undocumented fills and weathered alluvial fan deposits as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation and as otherwise directed by the Project geologist. Project Geologist City Engineering Department Project Applicant/ Developer During grading and excavating Less than Significant GEO-6 Rockfall hazard analysis should be performed during the design phase if structures are Project Geologist planned within 100 feet of these hillsides (i.e., Coral Mountain and Martinez Rockslide) once City Engineering During design Less than plans are further developed to evaluate this Department phase Significant hazard and provide site -specific mitigation recommendations (i.e., impact walls or Project Applicant/ berms/channels), as required. Developer GEO-7 Slopes shall be engineered for stability, including during seismic events, to reduce potential slope failure hazards, as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. GEO-8 Manufactured Slope Maintenance and Protection. To reduce the erosion and surficial Project slumping potential of the graded slopes, Geotechnical permanent manufactured slopes shall be Engineer protected from erosion by concrete lining, City Engineering During design Less than riprap, groundcover planting or other Department phase Significant appropriate method (i.e., jute matting, polymer coating, etc.) as approved by the project Applicant/ Project geologist. These measures shall be Developer applied as soon as practicable. Drainage shall be designed and maintained to collect surface waters and direct them away from manufactured slopes and as required by the Project geologist. Travertine Final EIR 4-40 July 2024 628 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM GEO-9 Structural setbacks, including those for retaining walls, shall be established as prescribed by the Project geotechnical engineer. b. Erosion GEO-10 The project proponent shall comply with the most current Construction General Permit (CGP) (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012- 0006-DWQ). Compliance with the CGP involves the development and implementation of a Project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which is designed to reduce potential adverse impacts to surface water quality during the period of construction. The SWPPP may include, but is not limited to, the following BMPs: City Planning & • Temporary Soil Stabilization: sandbag Engineering barriers, straw bale barriers, sediment Department Prior to the Less than traps, and fiber rolls; issuance of Significant Project Applicant/ grading permits • Temporary Sediment Control: hydraulic mulch and geotextiles; Developer • Wind Erosion Control: watering of the construction site, straw mulch; • Tracking Control: staging/storage area and street sweeping; • Non-stormwater Management: clear water diversion and dewatering; and • Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control: vehicle and equipment cleaning, concrete waste management, and contaminated soil management. Travertine Final EIR 4-41 July 2024 629 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM d. located on expansive GEO-11 Expansion Potential. The expansion potential soil of the on -site soils is low to very low. In accordance with the Project geotechnical City Public Works Following evaluation recommendations, additional Department completion of Less than laboratory testing shall be performed grading Significant following completion of grading operations to Project Developer operations verify the expansion potential of the near - surface soils. f. Destroy a unique GEO-12 A qualified professional paleontologist shall paleontological prepare a Paleontological Resources resource or site or Monitoring and Mitigation Plan and a Qualified Prior to Less than unique geologic Worker's Environmental Awareness Program Paleontologist development Significant feature to train the construction crew, both to be implemented during development. Section 4.7, GHG-1: Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the Greenhouse Gas project applicant shall purchase a minimum of Emissions approximately 408,720 MTCO2e credits (approximately 13,624 MTCO2e per year for a. GHG Emissions that 30 years). The purchase of carbon credits may Significantly must be made from a CARE -approved carbon Impact the registry with independent third -party Environment verification. Examples of approved registries City Planning Prior to the include the American Carbon Registry, Department issuance of Significant and Climate Action Reserve, and Verra. The occupancy Unavoidable applicant shall submit documentation of the Project Applicant permits offset purchase to the City demonstrating that it mitigates a minimum of approximately 13,624 MTCO2e per year (408,720 MTCO2e over a 30-year period), priorto any occupancy of the site. Alternatively, the project applicant may submit a GHG reduction plan to the City for approval that achieves an equal level of GHG reduction outlined herein. The GHG plan Travertine Final EIR 4-42 July 2024 630 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM must include enforceable actions that reduce GHG emissions to at or below the total mitigated values presented herein. GHG-2 All residences shall incorporate roof -top solar panels, in -home batteries and EV charger stations to facilitate use of EVs, golf carts and other low -speed electric vehicles (LSEVs). GHG-3 All planned single-family homes to be electric - ready and shall include electrical circuits for space heating, water heating, cooking/ovens, and clothes dryers, electrical panel, branch circuits, and transfer switch for battery storage. GHG-4 Dedicated circuits and panels in residential and commercial buildings shall be provided to easily convert from natural gas to electric in the future. GHG-5 All non-residential components of the development where vehicle parking is provides shall also provide EV chargers. GHG-6 All household and other appliances shall be of the highest energy efficiency rating, such as Energy Star, practicable at the time of purchase. GHG-7 To limit and reduce energy use associated with water consumption, all project landscaping shall be desert and other drought tolerant vegetation. The use of turf shall be kept to a minimum. GHG-8 All HVAC systems shall be Very High Efficiency HVAC (SEER 16/80% AFUE or 9 HSPF) or greater efficiency. Travertine Final EIR 4-43 July 2024 631 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM GHG-9 All domestic hot water systems shall be Very High Efficiency Water Heater (0.92 Energy Factor) with Enhanced Solar Pre -heat System (min. 0.35 Net Solar Fraction). GHG-10 All potable water fixtures shall have EPA WaterSense Certification or greater efficiency. Section 4.9, Hazards HAZ-1 Prior to grading, Limited Phase II Subsurface and Hazardous Investigation shall be required. The Limited Materials Phase II Subsurface Investigation shall be conducted by an Environmental Professional a&b. The proposed as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR Part Project would result 312. in SI related to the • Per Section 312.10, an Environmental transport, use, or Professional is an environmental disposal of hazardous materials during consultant that has an accredited Environmental construction and education in earth or natural science, at professional least five years of formal training under operation; d. sites listed pursuant another environmental professional, a City Planning & y g Less than to Government Code professional state license, and maintains Engineering Prior to grading Significant Section 65962.5. expert knowledge in the environmental Department geology, sustainability, and engineering fields. Project Applicant • If chemicals exceeding regulatory thresholds are identified during the Phase II study, the Project will develop a Soils Management Plan. The Phase II study will be conducted pursuant to ASTM E1903-19 industry standards. HAZ-2 A site -specific Soils Management Plan (SMP) shall be developed by an Environmental Professional for the Project property if Travertine Final EIR 4-44 July 2024 632 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM chemical levels exceeding regulatory thresholds are identified during the Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation. The SMP shall be implemented during excavation and grading of the Project, and describe the protocol for managing (potentially contaminated) soils and disposing of (potentially hazardous) debris, as well as guidelines for handling known and/or undocumented subsurface features if discovered. HAZ-3 All agricultural related debris, materials, and foundations shall be removed and hauled to City Planning & an appropriate landfill prior to land Engineering disturbance in the previous vineyard area. If Department Less than significant soil staining is found at previous Didi During grang Significant storage locations, stained soil shall be Project Applicant excavated and disposed of in an approved landfill. HAZ-4 In compliance with the Construction General Permit (CGP) (Order No. 2009-009-DWQ as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012- 0006-DWQ), the Project shall develop and implement a project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for City Planning & construction of the project. The SWPPP shall Engineering include comprehensive handling, storage, and Department Prior to the Less than management procedures for building Project Applicant/ issuance its grading permits Significant materials, especially those that are hazardous Developer and toxic. The designation of staging areas for activities (i.e., fueling and maintaining vehicles, mixing paints, plaster, mortar, etc.), and storage of hazardous materials (i.e., paints, solvents, pesticides, fuels, oils, etc.) shall be determined in the SWPPP. Best Travertine Final EIR 4-45 July 2024 633 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM management practices (BMPs) are required in the SWPPP that demonstrate proper material delivery and storage; material use; and spill prevention and control. The SWPPP may include, but is not limited to, the following BMPs: • Temporary Soil Stabilization: sandbag barriers, straw bale barriers, sediment traps, and fiber rolls; • Temporary Sediment Control: hydraulic mulch and geotextiles; • Wind Erosion Control: watering of the construction site, straw mulch; • Tracking Control: staging/storage area and street sweeping; • Non-stormwater Management: clear water diversion and dewatering; and • Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control: vehicle and equipment cleaning, concrete waste management, and contaminated soil management. Lastly, and upon project completion of construction, all hazardous materials shall be removed from the project site and a Notice of Termination (NOT) shall be filed with the Regional Water Quality Control Board. HAZ-5 Prior to the development of the golf facility RCFD storage and maintenance facilities, the Prior to the applicant shall provide a Hazardous Materials City Planning & development of Less than Business Plan (HMBP) to the Riverside County Engineering the golf facility Significant Fire Department for review and approval, if Department necessary. The HMBP shall be kept up to date Travertine Final EIR 4-46 July 2024 634 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM in a location on -site and be available for Project Applicant/ review by the Riverside County Fire Developer Department, as needed. HAZ-6 Should any component of the proposed Project require the storage or handling of hazardous materials in quantities greater than or equal to 55 gallons of a liquid County of Riverside substance, 500 pounds of a solid substance, DEH or 200 cubic feet of compressed gas, it shall be required to follow the procedures City Planning established in Chapter 6.95 of the HSC, which Department Prior to business Less than requires any business handling and/or storing Significant a hazardous material shall obtain a permit Project Applicant/ from the DEH and electronically submit a Developer business plan in the Statewide Informational Management System, under the administration of the County of Riverside DEH. City Planning & HAZ-7 If onsite wells are determined to be Engineering inoperable, they shall be properly capped and Department Less than abandoned prior to grading activities in the Pi ror to grading Significant existing wellsite areas. Project Applicant/ Developer City Planning & HAZ-8 The Project shall consult an asbestos inspection Engineering consultant for a comprehensive asbestos survey Department Prior to Less than prior to demolition of the project site. demolition Significant Project Applicant/ Developer Section 4.10 Hydrology HWQ-1 The Operations and Maintenance (O&M) plan CVWD Prior to approval Less than and Water Quality shall include provisions to monitor and remove of final design Significant sediment along the west bank to maintain the Travertine Final EIR 4-47 July 2024 635 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM civ. Impede or redirect flood flows d. risk release of pollutants due to project inundation required conveyance and freeboard conditions. Other aspects of the bank maintenance shall be identified based on the final design configuration of the systems. A Flood Control Facilities Operations and Maintenance Manual for the proposed improvements shall be prepared and submitted to CVWD for review and approval. The manual shall meet the requirements of Section 5.8.9 of the Development Design Manual. City Public Works and Engineering Department Project Applicant/Developer Section 4.11, Noise N0I-1 Grading and building plans shall require project construction activities comply with a. Generation of noise the City of La Quinta Municipal Code levels in excess of requirements pertaining to construction established noise. standards N0I-2 During all project site construction, the b. Generation of construction contractors shall equip all excessive construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with groundborne properly operating and maintained mufflers, Prior to the vibration consistent with manufacturers standards. City Planning & approval of The construction contractor shall place all Public Works grading plans stationary construction equipment so that Department and/or issuance Less than emitted noise is directed away from the noise of building Significant sensitive receivers nearest the project site. Project Applicant/ permits N0I-3 The construction contractor shall locate Developer equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction - related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the project site during all project construction. N0I-4 The construction contractor shall limit construction haul truck deliveries to the hours permitted by the City of La Quinta. The contractor shall also design delivery routes to Travertine Final EIR 4-48 July 2024 636 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck - related noise. N0I-5 Prior to water well drilling, the construction City Planning & contractor shall provide a temporary 24-foot- Public Works Prior to water high noise barrier capable of reducing noise Department p well drilling Less than during well construction activities to 80 dBA Leq Significant or less. Project Applicant/ Developer Section 4.14, Public PS-1: Travertine Fire Master Plan (FMP) was Services developed to analyze emergency access to the Project and determine and implement a. Fire Protection strategies at the Project site to improve RCFD and CAL Fire operations and service delivery. The FMP and Addendum FMP were required to be prepared to address adequate fire protection for the area and mitigate potentially unacceptable response times in RCFD the interior of the Project. The FMP further states that conformance to the full circulation City Fire & Building Prior to issuance plan is required for any additional Department of Occupancy Less than development beyond Phase 1 of the Project. Permit Significant The later phases of development would Project include the improvement of Jefferson Street, Applicant/Developer which would provide emergency access to the Project. Full buildout of the Project is evaluated in the Addendum FMP. The Project applicant shall implement the safety measures established in the Travertine Fire Master Plan which include the following: • approved emergency access points; Travertine Final EIR 4-49 July 2024 637 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • roadway design standards for fire protection vehicles; • minimum water quantity and pressure necessary for firefighting; All developer plans showing fire system connections shall provide information on the type of fire system that is being installed for the development (e.g., wet -pipe fire sprinkler systems, deluge fire sprinkler systems and dry pipe and precaution fire systems). A fire flow of 2,375 gallons per minute for 2- hour duration at 20 psi shall be required at the Project in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. For residential areas, approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection, with no portion of any lot frontage more than a maximum of 500 feet from the hydrant shall be provided. Minimum fire flow for all residential structures shall be 875 gallons per minute for a 1-hour duration at 20 psi operating pressure. Fire hydrant spacing shall be in accordance with Appendix C of the California Fire Code. Both requirements must be available prior to placing any combustible materials on the job site. The fire system plans shall be submitted to CVWD to review the complexity and type of proposed fire system. PS-2: The Addendum to the Fire Master Plan ensures adequate fire protection for the area through the following enhanced mitigation measures. • building construction standards; Travertine Final EIR 4-50 July 2024 638 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • emergency power facilities for the proposed booster stations; • an area of refuge; • optic -con sensors located to open gates ahead of fire engine arrival; • implementation of a community emergency response team (FEMA) programs; and HOA/community training for CPR and AED and risk reduction programs. Section 4.13, Mitigation Measures Transportation TRA-1 Project mitigation may include a combination of a fair share of fee payments to the affected a. Conflict with an jurisdiction, construction of specific applicable plan or improvements and reimbursement to the policy addressing Project proponent to account for proponent the circulation fair share of improvement, or a combination system of these approaches. The Summary of 2040 c. Increase hazards Intersection Improvements (Table 4.16-26) due to a geometric are set forth below, are feasible and will City Public Works Prior to the design feature mitigate Project impacts for all three access Department issuance of Less than d. Result in inadequate options discussed above to levels that are less grading and Significant emergency access than significant. Project Applicant building permits. The following improvements are recommended by the TIA: • Monroe Street at Avenue 52(#14) — Install traffic signal control; Provide separate northbound left turn lane, provide second northbound through lane. Travertine Final EIR 4-51 July 2024 639 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • Monroe Street at Avenue 60 (#10) — Construct traffic signal improvements for eventual reimbursement via the City of La Quinta. In addition to General Plan geometrics, provide the following lanes: ■ SB Approach: Provide separate right turn lane ■ EB Approach: Provide separate right turn lane with right turn overlap phase ■ WB Approach: Provide 2nd through lane • Madison Street at Avenue 58 (#1) — Install traffic signal control; provide second eastbound through lane. In addition to General Plan geometrics, provide the following lanes: EB Approach: Convert inside through lane into 2nd left turn lane. • Madison Street at Avenue 54 (0) — Install traffic signal control; Convert eastbound de facto right turn lane into free right turn lane. • Jefferson Street at Avenue 50 (#8) — Provide second westbound through lane. (This intersection is located in both the City of La Quinta and the City of Indio. The proposed improvement is in the City of Indio.) Travertine Final EIR 4-52 July 2024 640 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • Jefferson Street at Avenue 54 (#6) — Install traffic signal control, convert 2nd eastbound through lane into right turn lane, provide westbound right turn overlap phasing. • Monroe Street at Avenue 58 (#11) — Install traffic signal control, provide separate northbound left turn lane, provide separate northbound right turn lane, provide separate southbound left turn lane, provide separate eastbound left turn lane, provide separate westbound left turn lane; Provide separate northbound left turn lane. In addition to General Plan geometrics, provide the following lanes: ■ NB Approach: Provide 2nd left turn lane, add right turn overlap phase to right turn lane ■ SB Approach: Provide 2nd left turn lane ■ EB Approach: Provide separate right turn lane • Monroe Street at Airport Blvd (#12) — Install traffic signal control • Monroe Street at Avenue 54 (#13) — Install traffic signal control, provide separate southbound left turn lane, provide separate westbound left turn lane; provide second northbound through lane, provide second southbound through lane. Travertine Final EIR 4-53 July 2024 641 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • Jefferson Street at Avenue 52 (#7) — reconstruct the current roundabout design to incorporate 2 circulating lanes around the center island to accommodate an additional through lane in the northbound and southbound directions. • Jackson Street at Avenue 58 (#18) — Install traffic signal control (This intersection is located in the County of Riverside). • Jackson Street at Airport Boulevard (#19)— Install traffic signal control. (This intersection is located in the County of Riverside). • Monroe Street at Avenue 62 (#9) — Install traffic signal control, provide northbound shared left -through -right lane, provide separate eastbound left turn lane, provide separate westbound right turn lane. (This intersection is located in the City of La Quinta at the northwest corner, and in the County of Riverside at the northeast, southwest and southeast corners). In addition to General Plan geometrics, provide the following lanes: ■ SB Approach: Provide 2nd left turn lane, add right turn overlap phase to existing right turn lane ■ EB Approach: Convert through - right lane into left -through -right lane Travertine Final EIR 4-54 July 2024 642 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ■ WB Approach: Provide separate left turn lane • Jackson Street at Avenue 62 (#16) — Install traffic signal control. (This intersection is located in the County of Riverside.) • Jackson Street at Avenue 60 (#17) — Provide traffic signal. (This intersection is located in the County of Riverside.) TRA-2: Traffic Control Plan Prior to obtaining a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare and submit the City of La Quinta for review and approval detailed construction traffic management plans, including street closure information, detour plans, haul routes, and staging plans as necessary for any off -site work that would encroach on public right-of-way. The construction traffic management plans shall include the following elements, as appropriate: • Provisions for temporary traffic control during all construction activities adjacent to public right-of-way to improve traffic flow on public roadways (e.g., flag person); • Construction -related vehicles shall not park on surrounding public streets; • Provision of safety precautions for pedestrians and bicyclists through such measures as alternate routing and protection barriers; Travertine Final EIR 4-55 July 2024 643 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • Schedule construction -related deliveries to reduce travel during peak travel periods; • Obtain the required permits for truck haul routes from the County of Riverside, the City of Rancho Mirage, the City of Palm Desert, and Cathedral City prior to the issuance of any permit for the project; and • Obtain a Caltrans transportation permit for use of oversized transport vehicles on Caltrans facilities. • Outline adequate measures to ensure emergency vehicle access during all aspects of the project's construction, including, but not limited to, the use of flagmen during partial closures to streets surrounding the project site to facilitate the traffic flow until construction is complete. Include the implementation of security measures during construction in areas that are accessible to the general public to help reduce any increased demand on law enforcement services, including fencing construction areas, providing security lighting, and providing security personnel to patrol construction sites. Travertine Final EIR 4-56 July 2024 644 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Section 4.17, Tribal Cultural Resources a. Cause substantial Qualified adverse change in Archaeologist significance of tribal cultural resource Native American Prior to and that is Monitors during ground Less than i. A site listed in the See CR-1 through CR-9 disturbing CRHR or Local City Planning activities Significant Register, Tribal Department Cultural Resources ii. A resource Project Applicant/ determined to be Developer significant to a California Native American tribe. Section 4.18, Utilities CVWD and Service Systems City Public Works a. stormwater impact See HWQ-1 and Engineering Prior to approval Less than Department of final design Significant Project Applicant/Developer Travertine Final EIR 4-57 July 2024 645 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Table 4-2 Travertine Specific Plan Amendment Project Design Features Project Design Features 4.1 Aesthetics PDF AES-1 All construction equipment will be stored onsite within a designated area that is fenced with opaque construction fencing in order to reduce temporary visual impacts. Construction waste will be stored in an area that is accessible to weekly refuse pick up. All construction waste will be taken to a recycling center. PDF AES-2 The Avenue 62 crossing over Dike No. 4 shall include a concrete barrier at the edge of the right-of-way of Avenue 62 over Dike No. 4. The concrete barrier shall be embossed in an aesthetically pleasing manner to further blend the crossing of Avenue 62 with its surroundings. 4.2 Air Quality PDF AQ-1 To reduce water demands and associated energy use, subsequent development proposals within the Project property would be required to implement a Water Conservation Strategy and demonstrate a minimum 20% reduction in indoor and outdoor water usage, consistent with the current CalGreen Building Code performance standards for residential and non-residential land uses, achieved in part through the schedule of plumbing fixtures and fixture fittings that will reduce indoor use and efficient irrigation systems for outdoor use. PDF AQ-2 In order to reduce the amount of waste disposed at landfills, the Project would be required to implement a 50% waste diversion as required by AB 939. 4.2 Air Quality PDF 131O-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Project proponent shall implement the recommendations of the Project Drainage Study (DEIR, Appendix J.3) and in accordance with the recommendations of the Project Drainage Plan prior to issuance of a grading permit obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Project Proponent shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 4.6 Energy Resources PDF ENR-1 The Project shall, consistent with the Specific Plan Amendment incorporate complementary land uses near one another in order to decrease VMTs since trips between land use types are shorter and may be accommodated by non -auto modes of transport. Travertine Final EIR sm July 2024 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PDF ENR-2 The Project property includes sidewalk connections, trail networks (i.e., strolling trails, Community Grand Loop trail, and interconnector trails), and a Class II bike path. The sidewalk connections, trails, and bike paths would minimize barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. PDF ENR-3 The Project will be required to implement Title 24's Residential Mandatory Measures and Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 20) in effect at the time of construction, which require the installation of solar photovoltaic systems to newly constructed, low-rise residential buildings, high efficiency lighting, and application of energy efficient design building shells and building components, such as windows, roof systems, electrical lighting systems, and heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. PDF ENR-4 The Project will install water -efficient plumbing fixtures and irrigation systems, LED technology, and drought - tolerant plants in landscaping. 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions PDF GHG-1 The Project will consider the solar orientation of buildings to reduce impact of the development with natural environment. PDF GHG-2 The Project will implement passive and active solar systems to take advantage and consider the year -around abundant sunshine. 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions PDF HWQ-1 The Grand Loop Trail may from, time to time, be declared temporarily closed due to heightened public safety concerns, with entry restricted or prohibited. Public safety conditions may include, but are not limited to, wet conditions, natural debris, or seasonal closure. PDF HWQ-2 Prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval, the Project proponent shall obtain coverage under the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Construction General Permit). Project construction shall comply with all applicable requirements specified in the Construction General Permit, including but not limited to, preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), a signed certification statements, and any other compliance -related documents required by the permit, to the State Water Resources Control Board. Travertine Final EIR 4-59 July 2024 647 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PDF HWQ-3 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Project proponent shall implement the recommendations of the Project Drainage Study (DEIR, Appendix J.3) and in accordance with the recommendations of the Project Drainage Plan prior to issuance of a grading permit obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Project Proponent shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 4.11 Land Use and Planning PDF LU-1 Consistent with the Travertine Specific Plan Amendment, the Project will offer a variety of housing and recreational amenities. The housing sizes and styles will be designed to meet the needs of all age groups. The recreational amenities will include a 5-mile-long public trail that will be developed around the perimeter of the Project property; a central private spine trail that bisects the residential areas of the property; on -street bike paths; preservation of natural open space; additional private parks located within the development area; a skills golf course and golf academy; and a resort and spa with restaurants, shops and activities. 4.14 Public Services PDF PS-1 The Project and residential areas shall be gated, with the intention of increasing community security and minimizing potential crimes, and consistent with standard operations of resort communities, the proposed resort will incorporate private security services to maximize security of the overall Project. Additionally, lighting features throughout the Project will enhance security and maximize visibility within the Project streets, intersections, and other crosswalks. PDF PS-2 All water mains and fire hydrants providing the required fire flows will be constructed in accordance with the City Fire Code Appendix B and Appendix C in effect at the time of development. 4.16 Transportation PDF TR-1 The project will implement marketing strategies to optimize interaction between on -site resort and residential uses. Information sharing and marketing are important components to successful trip reduction strategies. Marketing strategies will include: • Resident member benefits that include use of the resort amenities • Event promotions Travertine Final EIR m July 2024 648 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • Publications PDF TR-2 The Project property includes sidewalk connections and would minimize barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. Travertine Final EIR 4-61 July 2024 649 RESOLUTION NO. 2024 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, TO APPROVE A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT, SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO ALLOW THE DEVELOPMENT OF 1,200 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 100 ROOM HOTEL ON 855 ACRES LOCATED SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET CASE NUMBERS: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002 SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 (TTM 37387) PROJECT: TRAVERTINE APPLICANT: TRG LAND INC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on August 6, 2024, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by TRG Land, Inc. for approval of a Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, and Development Agreement for a master -planned community on 855 acres located south of Avenue 60, north of Avenue 64, and west of Madison Street, more particularly described as: Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 766-110-003, 766-110-004, 766-110-007, 766-110-009; 766-120-001, 766-120- 002, 766-120-003, 766-120-006, 766-120-015, 766-120-016, 766-120-018, 766-120- 021, 766-120-023; 753-040-014, 753-040-016, 753-040-017; 753-050-007, 753-050- 029; 753-060-003; 764-280-057, 764-280-059, 754-280-061 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on July 17, 2024, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the site and emailed or mailed to all interested parties who have requested notification relating to the project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2024-008 recommending the City Council adopt Findings and a Statement of Overriding Consideration, certify Environmental Assessment 2017-0008, and approve the Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment, Tentative Tract Map, Zone Change, and Development Agreement at a duly noticed Public Hearing on June 25, 2024; and 650 Resolution No. 2024-XXX General Plan Amendment 2017-0002; Specific Plan 2017-0004; Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM 37387) Project: Travertine Location: South of Avenue 60, North of Avenue 64, West of Madison Street Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 2 of 6 WHEREAS, the Zone Change and Development Agreement are being adopted by separate ordinances in accordance with state law; and WHEREAS, said General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and Tentative Tract Map have complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (Resolution 1983-63). The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2018011023) for Environmental Assessment 2017-0008. The City Council has adopted Resolution No. 2024- certifying the Environmental Impact Report and making Findings to determine that the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the significant impacts associated with air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and transportation, and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations as Exhibit A of said Resolution, detailing the findings in support of this determination; and General Plan Amendment 2017-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said General Plan Amendment [Exhibit A, B, C]: The map amendment is internally consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan as outlined in Exhibit C. 2. Approval of the General Plan Amendment will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare because the community will be entirely self-contained and of high quality and will include homes, a resort and associated amenities, recreational facilities (parks, trails, golf facility), and perimeter improvements and streets consistent and complementary to improvements surrounding the site. 3. The proposed Land Use designations are compatible with the designations on adjacent properties, as the project incorporates largely residential uses in a largely residential area with complementary commercial and recreational uses. 4. The proposed Land Use designations are suitable and appropriate for the subject property, as they are similar to those currently allowed on the affected parcels. 5. Approval of the General Plan Amendment is warranted because the configuration of uses has changed to address environmental constraints as a result of follow-up technical studies for the site as required by the original Travertine Environmental Impact Report, and consistency with the conceptual plan for the project is required. 651 Resolution No. 2024-XXX General Plan Amendment 2017-0002; Specific Plan 2017-0004; Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM 37387) Project: Travertine Location: South of Avenue 60, North of Avenue 64, West of Madison Street Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 3 of 6 Specific Plan 2017-0004 WHEREAS, the effective Specific Plan for the Travertine property, SP1994-026, was approved by the City Council in June 1995 pursuant to Resolution 1995-039 and was approved for a time extension in July 1999 by the Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution 1999-061; and WHEREAS, Specific Plan 2017-0004 will repeal and replace the SP1994-026 and become the effective Specific Plan for the Travertine property; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, the City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Specific Plan [Exhibit E]: 1. The proposed SP2017-0004 is consistent with the goals, policies, and objectives of the General Plan, as described above. 2. Approval Specific Plan 2017-0004 will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare because the community will be entirely self-contained and of high quality and will include homes, a resort and associated amenities, recreational facilities (parks, trails, golf facility), and perimeter improvements and streets consistent and complementary to improvements surrounding the site. 3. Specific Plan 2017-0004 is compatible with zoning on nearby properties, which also allows residential planned communities. 4. Specific Plan 2017-0004 is suitable and appropriate for the subject property, as the same land uses as currently permitted will be developed. Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM 37387) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map [Exhibit F]: 1. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, as amended, and implements the Low Density Residential, General Commercial, Tourist Commercial, and Open Space land use designations allowed on the site. 2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the La Quinta General Plan with the implementation of recommended conditions of approval. 652 Resolution No. 2024-XXX General Plan Amendment 2017-0002; Specific Plan 2017-0004; Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM 37387) Project: Travertine Location: South of Avenue 60, North of Avenue 64, West of Madison Street Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 4 of 6 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Draft EIR found that impacts to the environment could be reduced to less than significant levels, with the exception of air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and vehicle miles traveled. The City has determined that the benefits of the project outweigh the impacts to these resources, to be identified in the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations. 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems insofar as the map will be required to comply with all laws, standards, and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality, and other public health issues in subsequent maps, site development permits, and other approvals necessary for development of the land. 5. The site of the proposed subdivision is suitable for the density and type of development proposed. The reduction of units from the existing land uses to the new land uses is more suitable for the subject property. 6. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 13 of the City's Subdivision Regulations Code, minimum lot area requirements, and other applicable provisions of Title 9 of the City's Zoning Code, and the Subdivision Map Act and the proposed Specific Plan. 7. The design and improvements required for the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All roadway improvements, easements, if any and surrounding improvements will be completed to City standards. WHEREAS, Senate Bill 330 and amendments to Government Code Section 65863 (sometimes referred to as the state's "No Net Loss Law") does not allow a city to "downzone" or otherwise approve a development policy, standard, or condition for a housing development project that results in a general plan designation, specific plan designation, or zoning of a parcel or parcels to a "less intensive use" below what was allowed under the land use designation or zoning ordinances in effect on January 1, 2018; and WHEREAS, the Travertine project is considered a housing development per Government Code Section 65589.5 (h)(2); and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 330 expressly exempts from its limitations and requirements, among other criteria, the adoption or amendment of a development policy, standard, or condition (such as a general plan designation, specific plan designation, or zone change) in a manner that implements mitigation measures necessary to comply with 653 Resolution No. 2024-XXX General Plan Amendment 2017-0002; Specific Plan 2017-0004; Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM 37387) Project: Travertine Location: South of Avenue 60, North of Avenue 64, West of Madison Street Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 5 of 6 CEQA. (Gov. Code, § 66300(e)(3)(D), formerly § 66300(h)(1).) The Travertine project implements mitigation measures necessary to comply with various state -agency imposed mandates to comply with CEQA; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 330 does not prevent the adoption of the proposed project approvals, as referenced in the Travertine Project Exemption Findings [Exhibit G]; and WHEREAS, Senate Bill 330 does not prevent the adoption of the proposed project approvals because none of the project areas include sites to accommodate the City's low - and moderate -income housing allocation, as listed in the current (and HCD-certified) Housing Element's inventory of sites, adopted to comply with the current cycle for the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That the above project be determined by the City Council to be consistent with the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Travertine project (EA2017-0008, SCH #2018011023). SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby does approve General Plan Amendment 2017- 0002, Specific Plan 2017-0004, Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM 37387) for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval [Exhibit H]. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on August 6, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 654 Resolution No. 2024-XXX General Plan Amendment 2017-0002; Specific Plan 2017-0004; Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM 37387) Project: Travertine Location: South of Avenue 60, North of Avenue 64, West of Madison Street Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 6 of 6 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 655 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX EXHIBIT A Existing General Plan Designations AlgNfJE 59 I Existing General Plan Proposed General Plan General Plan Designation Acres Units Acres Units Low Density Residential 382.2 1526 31.9.0 758 Medium j High Residential 84.4 774 60.8 442 Tourist Commercial 30.9 84.5 Open Space - Recreation 369.4 55.9 Open Space -Natural 12.2 301.2 General Commercial 10.0 Master Planned Roadways 20.1 35.0 Total 909.2 2300 855.4 1200 A Coral (4k+tn]'xi n Dike 4 i 1 u .a g ill! n r j 1 r 1 . ,J ..— .__ ... AVENUE fit im 1 i i ' I Marti n � L 11',f_1C1C Slide ■ - I I LEGEND Low Denslly ReetdenVal _ Tpuri$t Commercial PrupDSed SpeciTc Plan Boundary _ MediumlHigh Density Residential _ Open Space - Recreation Existing SpacifG Plan Boundary _ Goneral Commercial 656 Proposed General Plan Designations NUEM !11 - Existing General Plan Proposed General Plan General Plan Designation Acres Units Acres Units Low Density Residential 382.2 1526 319.0 758 Medium/ High Residential 84.4 774 fi0.8 442 Tourist Commercial 30.9 84.5 Open Space - Recreation 365.3 55.9 Open Space -Natural 12.2 301.2 Major Community Facilites 4.1 General Commercial 10.0 Master Planned Roadways 1 20.1 35.0 Total 1 909,2 855.4 1200 Coral-- MQUEltdill ! Me 4 � r PR OPOSEDJEFFFRSGW STREET _ ',AP LOOF S -?EET �A.,T 1 s L PSTREETe 'Ti" . — AVENUE 600 1l 44 l y` AVaWP �:.E. M7kS�l z S t { 1 - j �f -��r 'y'ir y 1• r R{x:du LEGEND 0 Law Ounsity Residential ® Open Space - Recreation Proposed Specific Plan Boundary _ Medium! High Density Reeldenual Dpen Space • flalural _ Tourisl Commamial 657 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2024-XXX EXHIBIT B Existing • Madison, Jefferson and Avenue 62 as Modified Secondary Highway • Crossing Dike 4 — 88' Right -of -Way im:Eiiiii Sphere of Influence ■ a FrimaryArteriol ■ -a 5econdaryArter►al ,oim m Modified Secondary ........ Collector Arterial rE3=-=D0 Urban Arterial Proposed • Removal of Madison south of Avenue 60 • Realignment of Jefferson Street 658 COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2024-XXX EXHIBIT C Statement and Consistencv with General Plan Statement: As a part of the Travertine Development, the City will consider the approval of this General Plan Amendment that proposes changing certain aspects of the City's General Plan land use and circulation designations in order to provide for the development of the proposed amended Travertine Specific Plan. This General Plan Amendment would enable the City to implement revised circulation and infrastructure alternatives intended to convey the vision for the Travertine Specific Plan area. This amendment proposes modifications to the General Plan Land Use Map and the General Plan Roadway Classifications exhibit. No text changes to the General Plan are proposed. This application requests the following: • Modify the General Plan Land Use Map, as follows, 1. Modify the existing areas and locations of land use designations at the project site with the following designations: Low Density Residential, Medium/High Density Residential, Tourist Commercial, Open Space - Recreation, Open Space Natural. 2. Removal of the 10 acre General Commercial designation within the Travertine development area. • Modify the General Plan Roadway Classifications exhibit, as follows, 3. The termination of the Madison Street extension as a General Plan Roadway from Avenue 60 to Avenue 62. 4. The realignment of the Jefferson Street extension to be consistent with the alignment proposed in the Travertine Development. In conjunction with this application, an Environmental Impact Report, Amendment to the Specific Plan, Zone Change, Tentative Tract Map, Development Agreement, and a Fire Master Plan are currently being prepared for the Travertine development. An assessment of the proposed Amendment's consistency with applicable General Plan goals, policies and programs is provided below. General Plan Consistencv: Land Use • GOAL LU-1 Land use compatibility throughout the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides diverse and high -quality housing, tourist commercial, resort and spa, skills golf course with club facilities, and park and recreation opportunities that meet the needs of its residents and bring tourism to the City. The Travertine Specific Plan establishes and maintains connections between existing neighborhoods and the Specific Plan neighborhoods. 659 • GOAL LU-2 High quality design that complements and enhances the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides many high -quality design elements that will ensure the following: a wide array of residential housing; integrates recreational uses; provides tourist commercial uses, preserves open space, and protects scenic views. • GOAL LU-3 Safe and identifiable neighborhoods that provide a sense of place. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan incorporates design guidelines that will ensure high quality architecture and landscaping. The residential enclaves will be cohesive in design and character and recreational facilities will be consistent with their surrounding neighborhood. The master -planned community of Travertine is designed to complement the surrounding development in the area, incorporating residential, tourist commercial, open space, and park areas into a cohesive plan complementary to uses in the vicinity of the project. This Specific Plan is designed such that compatible land uses, open space areas, landscaped manufactured slopes, and elevation changes serve as buffers between the planned Travertine community and surrounding open space land uses. • GOAL LU-5 A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides a mix of housing types that include medium, and low -density housing types, designed with enhanced architecture and landscaping, and access to pedestrian walkways, providing a walkable community for the residents. Circulation • GOAL CIR-2 A circulation system that promotes and enhances transit, alternative vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian systems. Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan provides a master planned roadway system with a network of bicycle/pedestrian pathways designed to meet the needs of residents, safely and efficiently transport people and goods, and accommodate the projected residential growth within the community. Livable Community • GOAL SC-1 A community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides a master planned community that includes over 357 acres of open space (including natural, passive and active areas) which is served by a network of pedestrian, bike and hiking trails, will connect residents and 660 TRAVERTINE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION visitors to amenities to meet both active and passive needs. Residents will also have two community parks as well as localized pocket parks within neighborhoods. Visitors and residents will have access to a golf academy, and resort/ spa facilities. Residences will be designed in conformance with high architectural standards. CEC Energy Efficient Standards (CBC Title 24) will be required for all residential and non-residential uses. Solarsystems, both passive and active will take advantage of the year-round abundant sunshine. Green Building technology will be promoted to improve resource efficiency in the residential and tourist serving commercial uses. Economic Development • GOAL ED-1 A balanced and varied economic base which provides the City a fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan includes tourist commercial uses that will accommodate and attract residents of the city and visitors, offer new employment opportunities, and contribute to a strong and diversified economic base. The project developer will pay its reasonable fair -share of impact fees and improvement costs to fund the infrastructure improvements and other public facilities necessary to service the planned development • GOAL ED-2 The continued growth of the tourism and Resort/Spa industries in the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan allows for resident and tourist commercial uses that complement and support one another and will help maintain a strong sales and property tax base. The tourist commercial components of the Specific Plan will promote transient occupancy tax, retail, restaurants, and other support uses in a pedestrian friendly environment which will enhance the fiscal growth potential and real estate values of the City and the Travertine community. Parks. Recreation and Trails • GOAL PR-1 A comprehensive system of parks and recreation facilities and services that meet the active and passive needs of all residents and visitors. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will provide many recreational opportunities, including: two community parks (totaling approximately 13 acres), 6 miles of walkable trails that circumnavigate the community and an additional 5 miles of trails interior to the project providing for a walkable community for the residents. Residential development areas will also have additional localized pocket park areas within the neighborhoods. On -street bike lanes will make it convenient to ride around the project for exercise and local transportation. A Class II bikeway will be constructed on the Jefferson Street/Avenue 62 as well as the Loop Streets for the use and enjoyment of La Quinta residents. These amenities will also provide access to the projects, 55.9 acres of recreational open space, and 301 acres of natural open space (including the 152 acres of habitat preservation), as well as the resort/spa and the golf academy. 661 TRAVERTINE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Housing • GOAL H-1 Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan is designed to provide a range of housing types and densities at varying price points that will help meet the anticipated demand for housing within different economic segments of the City. • GOAL H-5 Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons. Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan developer will encourage the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination in lending practices and in the for -sale or rental housing. • GOAL H-6 Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan incorporates sustainable design strategies that promote energy and water conservation measures. The project is designed to control water runoff and avoid contamination of water resources. All HOA maintained landscaped areas will be designed in a water -efficient manner and drought tolerant plants will be used throughout the individual neighborhoods, the resort/spa and golf course. Title 24 compliance is required for all construction. Air Quality • GOAL AQ-1 A reduction of air emissions generated within the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will expand routes for golf carts and neighborhood electric vehicles, and plan for accessing and recharging facilities at the resort/spa and the golf academy facility. The plan provides an extensive pedestrian and bicycle network of paths, approximately 11 miles of such trails in addition to the on -street bike lanes that will be provided, to allow safe and convenient access to recreational and community facilities. Proposed development air quality emissions and greenhouse gas emissions shall be analyzed under CEQA and adhere to the City's GHG Reduction Plan. All construction activities will minimize emission of all air quality pollutants, grading activities shall adhere to established fugitive dust criteria. The project will implement the air quality mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR. 662 TRAVERTINE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Ener.Rv and Mineral Resources • GOAL EM-2 The conservation and thoughtful management of local mineral deposits to assure the long- term viability of limited resources. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will preserve any local mineral resources identified by the Department of Mines and Geology and to the greatest extent possible designate those undeveloped lands as Open Space. The project will implement mineral deposit resource mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR if necessary. Biological Resources • GOAL 1310-1 The protection and preservation of native and environmentally significant biological resources and their habitats. Consistency Analysis: The project has designated 152 acres of protected habitat area along the southern, western, and eastern boundaries of the site. This preserve area will protect known biological resources, including the important habitat for the Bighorn Sheep. The project will implement biological resource mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR. The designated habitat area also includes areas of cultural resources to be protected. Cultural Resources • GOAL CUL-1 The protection of significant archaeological, historic, and paleontological resources occur in the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will preserve any significant archaeological and historic resources to the greatest extent possible. The project has been redesigned to preserve all nine cultural resources identified that are within or intersect the project. The project will implement mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR. Water Resources • GOAL WR-1 Support the Coachella Valley Water District in its efforts to supply adequate domestic water to residents and businesses. Consistency Analysis: The project will utilize drought tolerant landscaping on all HOA maintained slopes and parkways. The resort/wellness center and the golf academy and its facilities will predominately use water wise landscaping and judicially reduce the use of turf in the golf skills course area. Open Space and Conservation • GOAL OS-1 Preservation, conservation and management of the City's open space lands and scenic resources for enhanced recreation, environmental and economic purposes. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine plan preserves 301 acres for habitat and natural663 TRAVERTINE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION preservation purposes. The vistas of the Santa Rosa Mountains, Coral Mountain and other scenic resources will not be disrupted. Noise • GOAL N-1 A healthful noise environment which complements the City's residential and Resort/Spa character. Consistency Analysis: The project complements the City's residential and Resort/Spa character. The project EIR addresses the potential impacts of noise associated with the proposed development. The Specific Plan will incorporate appropriate design measures and adhere to all applicable restrictions and requirements identified in the EIR to ensure that the potential impacts are mitigated to below a level of significance Soils and Geology • GOAL GEO-1 Protection of the residents' health and safety, and of their property, from geologic and seismic hazards. Consistency Analysis: The project EIR addresses the potential impacts of natural hazards associated with the proposed development. The Specific Plan will incorporate appropriate design measures and adhere to all applicable restrictions and requirements identified in the EIR to ensure that the potential impacts are mitigated to below a level ofsignificance. Flooding and Hydrology • GOAL FH-1 Protection of the health and safety, and welfare of the community from flooding and hydrological hazards. Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan includes preservation and avoidance of the larger areas related to the identified Middle North and Middle South storm flows to address flooding concerns. Additionally, development has been sufficiently set back from the natural water courses to assure adequate protection of life, property, and habitat values. A reinforced flood protection barrier along the western and southern edge of development will provide flood protection for flows from the adjacent open space and directing the flows to downstream off -site areas along Dike No. 4 and the Guadalupe Dike thereby protecting the project from off -site flows. Hazardous Materials • GOAL HAZ-1 Protection of residents from the potential impacts of hazardous and toxic materials. Consistency Analysis: Development of the project will be evaluated in the EIR and the project will implement all measures identified in the project EIR to protect the residents'safety from potential impacts from hazardous and toxic material. 664 TRAVERTINE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT APPLICATION Emergency Services • GOAL ES-1 An effective and comprehensive response to all emergency service needs. Consistency Analysis: Fire protection and emergency response services to the Specific Plan Area will be provided by the City and County. The service levels of fire and police protection needed to adequately serve the Travertine community will be identified and addressed in the Environmental Impact Report being prepared in conjunction with this Specific Plan. Although Madison Street, south of Avenue 60, would be removed as a public right of way, it will be improved as an emergency vehicle accessway (EVA) for access into the Travertine community. During the phased construction of the community, interim solutions have been identified and will be implemented to ensure required access for fire and emergency services will be available at all times. Water Sewer & Other Utilities • GOAL UTL-1 Domestic water facilities and services which adequately serve the existing and long-term needs of the City. Consistency Analysis: The domestic water needs will be provided by Coachella Valley Water District. The water assessment analysis for the Travertine community will be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report being prepared in conjunction with this Specific Plan. • GOAL UTL-2 Sanitary sewer facilities and services which adequately serve the existing and long-term needs of the City. Consistency Analysis: The sewer needs and facilities will be provided by Coachella Valley Water District. The sewer services assessment analysis for the Travertine community will be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report being prepared in conjunction with this Specific Plan. 665 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX EXHIBIT D TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - OCTOBER 27, 2023 Draft City of La Quinta 78-4795 Calle Tampico . .y La Quinta, CA 92253 ... TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 667 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Introduction.................................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Purpose and Intent.......................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Authority and Requirements.........................................................................................1-1 1.3 Specific Plan Amendment Components.........................................................................1-2 1.4 Project Description.......................................................................................................1-3 1.4.1 Project Setting and Surrounding Land Uses.......................................................................1-6 1.5 Project Objectives.......................................................................................................1-10 1.6 Existing Conditions.....................................................................................................1-10 1.7 Project Site History.....................................................................................................1-11 1.7.1 Required Additional Studies After Specific Plan Approval...................................................1-11 1.8 Relationship to the City General Plan..........................................................................1-15 1.8.1 Land Use Element............................................................................................................1-15 1.8.2 Circulation Element..........................................................................................................1-18 1.9 Zoning Map Amendment............................................................................................1-19 2 Land Use......................................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Project Description and Summary................................................................................2-1 2.1.1 Land Use Plan Description.................................................................................................2-1 2.1.2 Open Space........................................................................................................................2-4 2.1.3 Recreational Trails..............................................................................................................2-4 2.1.4 Roadways...........................................................................................................................2-6 2.1.5 Residential..........................................................................................................................2-6 2.1.6 Tourist Serving Recreational Facilities.............................................................................2-10 2.2 Development Regulations & Standards.......................................................................2-11 2.2.1 Low Density Residential- Planning Areas 3-5, 7, 8, 10, & 12-16......................................2-11 2.3.2 Medium Density Residential — Planning Areas 2, 6, and 9...............................................2-13 2.3.3 Resort (Tourist Commercial) — Planning Areas 1 and 11.................................................2-14 2.3.5 Natural Open Space/Restricted Open Space — Planning Area 20....................................2-16 3 Design Guidelines........................................................................................................................................ 3-1 3.1 Purpose and Intent.......................................................................................................3-1 3.2 Introduction.................................................................................................................3-1 3.3 Theme..........................................................................................................................3-1 3.4 Architectural Design Elements......................................................................................3-2 TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 668 3.4.1 Color...................................................................................................................................3-3 3.4.2 Materials............................................................................................................................3-3 3.5 Landscape Design Elements........................................................................................3-12 3.5.1 Main Community and Gates Entries................................................................................3-15 3.5.2 Typical Entry Landscape and Monumentation................................................................3-15 3.5.3 Jefferson Street/Avenue 62 streetscape..........................................................................3-19 3.5.4 Loop Road Streetscape....................................................................................................3-19 3.5.5 Residential Streetscape....................................................................................................3-19 3.5.6 Parcel Landscape Open Space..........................................................................................3-23 3.5.7 Community Slope.............................................................................................................3-23 3.5.8 Open Space and Edge Conditions....................................................................................3-23 3.5.9 On -Street, Off -Street and Strolling Trails.........................................................................3-27 3.5.10 Public Hiking Trails...........................................................................................................3-27 3.5.11 Community West and East Parks.....................................................................................3-31 3.5.12 Resort and Spa.................................................................................................................3-34 3.5.13 Golf Academy / Practice Facility......................................................................................3-36 3.5.14 Typical Fences and Walls.................................................................................................3-37 3.5.15 Landscape Cross-Sections................................................................................................3-40 3.6 Planting Zones............................................................................................................3-49 3.7 Plant Material Guidelines...........................................................................................3-49 4 Infrastructure Plan.......................................................................................................................................4-1 4.1 Circulation Plan Description..........................................................................................4-1 4.2 Water...........................................................................................................................4-9 4.3 Sewer.........................................................................................................................4-11 4,4 Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan........................................................................4-13 4.4.1 Drainage Plan...................................................................................................................4-16 4.4.2 Stormwater Management Plan........................................................................................4-18 4.4.3 Grading Plan.....................................................................................................................4-18 4.5 Utilities......................................................................................................................4-19 4.6 Public Facilities & Services..........................................................................................4-20 4.6.1 Solid Waste......................................................................................................................4-20 4.6.2 Fire Protection..................................................................................................................4-20 4.6.3 Police Protection..............................................................................................................4-21 TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 669 4.6.4 Community Services & Facilities......................................................................................4-21 4.6.5 Recreation........................................................................................................................4-21 5 Implementation Measures and Administration...........................................................................................5-1 5.1 Procedures...................................................................................................................5-1 5.2 Financing Plan..............................................................................................................5-1 5.3 Maximum Allowable Development...............................................................................5-1 5.4 Statistical Table............................................................................................................5-2 5.5 Determination of Development Standards....................................................................5-3 5.6 Conceptual Grading and Construction Phasing Plan .......................................................5-5 5.7 Maintenance Plan.........................................................................................................5-8 5.8 Amendments................................................................................................................5-9 6 Appendix..................................................................................................................................................... 6-1 6.1 Consistency with City of La Quinta General Plan............................................................6-1 6.2 Reference Table and Exhibit..........................................................................................6-7 TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 670 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit 1.1 — Specific Plan Amendment — Area Comparison......................................................................1-5 Exhibit 1.2 — Regional Location Map..........................................................................................................1-7 Exhibit1.3 —Vicinity Map..........................................................................................................................1-8 Exhibit1.4 —Site Location Map..................................................................................................................1-9 Exhibit 1.5 — Conservation Area...............................................................................................................1-13 Exhibit 1.6.1— Existing General Plan Land Use Map................................................................................1-16 Exhibit 1.6.2 — Proposed Land Use Map..................................................................................................1-17 Exhibit 1.7.1— Existing Zoning.................................................................................................................1-20 Exhibit 1.7.2 — Proposed Zoning Plan.......................................................................................................1-21 Exhibit 2.1—Travertine Land Use Plan.......................................................................................................2-2 Exhibit2.2 — Recreation Plan.....................................................................................................................2-5 Exhibit 2.3 — Lot Configuration Estate and Luxury Single Family Detached..............................................2-7 Exhibit 2.4 — Lot Configuration Large and Mid SFD...................................................................................2-8 Exhibit 2.5 — Lot Configuration Small and Single Family Attached............................................................2-9 Exhibit 2.6 — Lot Configuration Resort Villas............................................................................................2-15 Exhibit3.1 — Estate Homes........................................................................................................................3-4 Exhibit 3.2 — Single Family Luxury Homes..................................................................................................3-5 Exhibit 3.3 — Single Family Mid Homes......................................................................................................3-6 Exhibit 3.4 — Single Family Entry Home.....................................................................................................3-7 Exhibit3.5 — Patio Homes..........................................................................................................................3-8 Exhibit 3.6 — Single Family Attached Units.................................................................................................3-9 Exhibit3.7 —Villas ....................................................................................................................................3-10 Exhibit 3.8 —Typical Materials.................................................................................................................3-11 Exhibit 3.9 — Overall Landscape Illustrative.............................................................................................3-13 Exhibit 3.10 — Landscape Categories Illustrative......................................................................................3-14 Exhibit 3.11— Main Community Entries..................................................................................................3-16 Exhibit 3.12 — Gated Entries.....................................................................................................................3-17 Exhibit 3.13 —Typical Entry Landscape and Monumentation.................................................................3-18 Exhibit 3.14 - Jefferson Street / Avenue 62 Streetscape.........................................................................3-20 Exhibit 3.15 — Loop Collector Streetscape...............................................................................................3-21 Exhibit 3.16 — Residential Streetscape.....................................................................................................3-22 Exhibit 3.17 — Parcel Landscape Open Space...........................................................................................3-24 TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 671 Exhibit 3.18 — Community Slope Landscape............................................................................................3-25 Exhibit 3.19 — Open Space and Edge Conditions.....................................................................................3-26 Exhibit 3.20 — On Street Trails..................................................................................................................3-28 Exhibit 3.21— Off Street Trails.................................................................................................................3-29 Exhibit 3.22 — Strolling Trail.....................................................................................................................3-30 Exhibit 3.23 — Community West Park......................................................................................................3-32 Exhibit 3.24 — Community East Park........................................................................................................3-33 Exhibit 3.25 — Resort and Spa Landscape Illustrative..............................................................................3-34 Exhibit 3.26 —Resort and Spa Landscape Concepts.................................................................................3-35 Exhibit 3.27 — Golf Training Facility Landscape Concept.........................................................................3-36 Exhibit 3.28 - Conceptual Wall Type Schedule................................................................................................ 3-37 Exhibit 3.29 - Overall Wall Elevations......................................................................................................3-38 Exhibit 3.30 — Landscape Cross -Sections Key Map — Interior..................................................................3-41 Exhibit 3.31— Landscape Cross -Sections Key Map — Exterior..................................................................3-42 Exhibit 3.32 — Landscape Cross -Section 1 and 2......................................................................................3-43 Exhibit 3.33 — Landscape Cross -Sections 3 and 4....................................................................................3-44 Exhibit 3.34 — Landscape Cross -Section 5................................................................................................3-45 Exhibit 3.35 — Landscape Cross -Section 6................................................................................................3-46 Exhibit 3.36 — Landscape Cross -Section 7, 8, and 9.................................................................................3-47 Exhibit 3.37 — Landscape Cross -Sections 10, 11, 12, and 13....................................................................3-48 Exhibit 3.38 - Planting Zones....................................................................................................................3-50 Exhibit 4.1 — Circulation Plan.....................................................................................................................4-3 Exhibit 4.2 — Roadway Sections A, B, & C...................................................................................................4-4 Exhibit 4.3 — Roadway Sections D, E, & F...................................................................................................4-5 Exhibit4.4 — Roundabout...........................................................................................................................4-6 Exhibit 4.5 — Street Gated Entry Section & Details....................................................................................4-7 Exhibit 4.6 —Typical Gated Entries.............................................................................................................4-8 Exhibit 4.7 — Conceptual Water Plan.......................................................................................................4-10 Exhibit 4.8 — Conceptual Sewer Plan........................................................................................................4-12 Exhibit 4.9 — Conceptual Grading Plan.....................................................................................................4-14 Exhibit 4.10 — Slope Ratio Diagram..........................................................................................................4-15 Exhibit 4.11— Conceptual Hydrology Plan...............................................................................................4-17 Exhibit 5.1—Construction Phase 1-A & 1-13 Plan........................................................................................5-7 TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 672 Exhibit 6.1—Travertine Specific Plan Land Use Plan (same as Exhibit 2.1)................................................6-2 LIST OF TABLES Table 1: Approved 1995 Specific Plan and Proposed Specific Plan Amendment.....................................1-3 Table 2 — Land Use Plan Comparison.......................................................................................................1-15 Table 3 - Zoning Plan Comparison...........................................................................................................1-19 Table4: Land Use Summary......................................................................................................................2-1 Table 5: Planning Area Summary..............................................................................................................2-3 Table 6: Development Standards for Single Family Detached Homes in Low Density Planning Areas ..2-12 Table 7: Development Standards for Medium Density Planning Areas..................................................2-13 Table 8: Development Standards for Villas ........ ..................................................................................... 2-14 Table 9: Development Standards for Hotel/Commercial........................................................................2-16 Table10: Landscape Palette...................................................................................................................3-51 Table 11: Prohibited Invasive Ornamental Plants....................................................................................3-54 Table 12: Travertine Specific Plan Statistical Table....................................................................................5-2 Table 13: Development Standards for Low Density Residential...............................................................5-3 Table 14: Development Standards for Medium Density Residential........................................................5-4 Table15: Phasing Plan Summary...............................................................................................................5-6 Table 16: Maintenance Responsibilities...................................................................................................5-8 TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 673 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose and Intent The Travertine Specific Plan Amendment document is prepared to guide development of the site by setting forth a development plan, phasing plan, infrastructure plans, development standards, recreation plan, and design guidelines for architecture, landscaping, and other design elements for the Travertine project. This is an amendment to the original 1995 Specific Plan (SP1994-026) and reduces overall project area from the original plan due to a number of environmental and regulatory constraints identified since the original approval. The grading design of the site is planned to accommodate the proposed development of the site, while still preserving and protecting environmentally sensitive areas. Project design elements are intended to create visual harmony with the surrounding natural environment. This amendment supersedes SP1994-026 and will be the governing document for the project area. 1.2 Authority and Requirements The Amendment creates a master -planned residential and resort/spa community with a balanced mix of land uses and a quality environment through comprehensive planning regulations, standards, and design guidelines. The purpose of this document is to provide a foundation for a variety of land uses on the Travertine property through the application of regulations, standards, and design guidelines. This Specific Plan Amendment, when adopted by Resolution, serves both planning and regulatory functions, and establishes infrastructure service needs. California Government Code Section 65450 et seq. grants local planning agencies the authority to prepare and adopt specific plans for any area covered by a General Plan for the purpose of establishing systematic methods of implementation of the General Plan. This section of the Government Code mandates what a specific plan shall contain including text and diagrams which specify all the following in detail: • The distribution, location, and text of the uses of land, including open space, within the area covered by the plan. • The proposed distribution, location and extent and intensity of major components of public and private transportation, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other facilities proposed to be located within the area covered by the plan and needed to support the land uses described in the plan. • Standards and criteria by which development will proceed, and standards for the conservation, development, and utilization of natural resources, where applicable. • A program of implementation measures including regulations, programs, and financing measures necessary to carry out the Travertine project. • A statement of its relationship to and consistency with the General Plan. The local authority and procedures for the review and adoption of the Specific Plan are described in Chapter 9.240 of the Municipal Code. The Specific Plan shall be adopted in accordance with the provisions of Article 8, Specific Plans, and Section 65450 et seq. of the California Government Code. For those situations and issues not addressed by this Specific Plan's regulations, the City's Zoning Code will serve as the regulatory requirement and as a supplement for administration review procedures, environmental review, and others. The Specific Plan, as amended, and the associated Final EIR shall be used in the review of all project proposals in the Specific Plan area. All mitigation measures shall be referenced in the Conditions of Approval for subsequent entitlements and are included in this Specific Plan as appendices. 1-1 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 674 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.3 Specific Plan Amendment Components This Specific Plan is organized into the following sections: Section 1. Introduction: This section summarizes the authority for preparing specific plans and contains the project description and history as well as development objectives. It also provides a comparison of the proposed Specific Pan Amendment to the original 1995 Specific Plan. Section 2. Land Use Plan: The Land Use Plan Section describes residential planning areas, proposed housing types, recreational and natural open space areas, and the community parks and trails planned within the community. Section 3. Design Guidelines: This section is intended to direct the site planning, landscaping, and architectural quality of the development. Streetscapes, entries, edge treatments, walls and fencing, lighting, signage, and architectural design are some of the features addressed in the Design Guidelines Section 4. Infrastructure: This section provides information on circulation improvements, planned backbone water, sewer, and storm drain systems, the grading concept for the development of the project, and public utilities serving Travertine. Section 5. Implementation Measures & Administration: The governing policies and procedures for the review and approval by the City of specific development proposals within the Specific Plan area are described in this section. This section provides the methods and procedures for interpreting and amending the Specific Plan, a summary of project financing, and the planned maintenance responsibilities for new development within the Specific Plan area. Section 6. General Plan Consistency Analysis: This discussion is included within the Appendix to the Specific Plan and provides an analysis of the consistency of the Specific Plan with the goals and policies of the City's General Plan. The Specific Plan Amendment is prepared to serve as an overall framework to guide the development of this project. To ensure the functional integrity, economic viability, environmental sensitivity, and positive aesthetic impact of the project, planning and development goals were established and supported through an extensive analysis. The analysis includes an examination of project environmental constraints, engineering feasibility, market acceptance, economic viability, City General Plan goals, development phasing, and local community goals. As amended, this Specific Plan serves as a regulatory document for development of the 855-acre site into a high -quality, master planned residential community containing a Resort/Spa, varied residential uses, golf and various open space and recreational uses. This document will provide guidance to the City of La Quinta, builders, developers, architects, and designers in implementing the project. 1-2 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 675 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.4 Project Description The Travertine development is a master planned residential community with a Resort/Spa located in the City of La Quinta on the southern edge of the Coachella Valley at the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The project is generally bounded by the extension of Avenue 60 on the north; the extension of Avenue 64 to the south; CVWD Dike No. 4 on the east; and Jefferson Street on the west. The proposed project includes development of a mix of uses including up to 1,200 dwelling units of varying residential product types, a resort facility with up to 100 rooms or villas, recreational uses such as a golf training/practice facility featuring a clubhouse and banquet facilities, a number of neighborhood parks, a public trail system and recreational open space, and natural open space for conservation. The Specific Plan Amendment proposes a reduced project from the 1995 Travertine Specific Plan as a result of additional studies and information made available since its approval. These subsequent studies update the environmental analysis and include mitigation measures. The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the 1995 Travertine Specific Plan analyzed the environmental impacts associated with development of approximately 909 acres of that Plan. However, that 1995 EIR was prepared as a "programmatic" EIR, with a set of Mitigation Measures that also required that additional specific technical studies and environmental analysis be completed prior to project implementation to more specifically identify all on -site environmental sensitivities. These required additional studies have now been completed and have more specifically identified environmental and economic constraints within the project area to such an extent that the implementation of the 1995 Specific Plan, as approved, is now infeasible. This Specific Plan Amendment recognizes those newly identified constraints and incorporates the necessary additional mitigations and modifications in order to comply with Federal, State and local requirements. A detailed discussion of each of these new studies is included in Section 1.7 Project Site History as well as the EIR prepared for this Specific Plan Amendment. However, they can be summarized as resulting in an increase in restricted and natural open space areas and a reduction of developable acreage of the Specific Plan area, due to the mitigation requirements of the 1995 EIR. Table 1 provides a comparison of the 1995 Specific Plan to this Amended Plan. Table 1: Approved 1995 Specific Plan and Proposed Specific Plan Amendment Approved 1995 Specific Plan 909-acres 2,300 Residential Dwelling Units 10-acres of Neighborhood Commercial 500 Room Resort / Hotel 36 — Hole Golf Course Proposed Specific Plan Amendment 855-acres 1,200 Residential Dwelling Units Neighborhood Commercial Removed 100 Room Resort and Wellness Spa Golf Training and Practice Facility with associated Recreational and Commercial Elements and Resort style multi -family homes 1-3 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 676 1.0 INTRODUCTION Tennis Club Private Recreation in Individual Developments 378-acres of Open Space (including golf course) Tennis Club Removed Private Recreation in Individual Developments 358-acres Open Space / Recreational & Restricted (no golf course in Open Space areas) Deletion of noncontiguous acreages including the northernmost Planning Area and miscellaneous acreage not within the City, and adjustments to boundary to accommodate preservation of open space and inclusion of Madison Street right-of-way for EVA purposes 1-4 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 677 1.0 INTRODUCTION Exhibit 1.1 -Specific Plan Amendment -Area Comparison _ Areas removed from Specific Plan 64.8 Acres _Areas added to Specific Plan 11 9 ni-races ■ ar_rr�■ � I ,I � I ■ I�rrrrrrrrri ■ ■ r I , ! L I I r r 1 4 ■ ■ ■ 1■ • 1 I 1 1 *If • 01118 ■ I � ■ I 1-5 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 678 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.4.1 Project Setting and Surrounding Land Uses The property is located in the City of La Quinta on the southern edge of the Coachella Valley at the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains. The project is generally bounded by the extension of Avenue 60 on the north; the extension of Avenue 64 to the south; CVWD Dike No. 4 on the east; and Jefferson Street on the west. (Exhibit 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4) The project site consists of the following Assessor Parcel Numbers: 766- 110-003, -004, -007, and -009; 766-120-001, -002, -003, -006, -015, -016, -018, -021, and -023 753-040- 014, 016, and -017, 753-050-007, and -029; 753-060-003, 764-280-057 and -059, and 764-028-061. North • Coral Mountain and Coral Mountain Park immediately north of the project site • Lake Cahuilla County Park and Lake Cahuilla approximately 1 mile north • Golf course communities including Andalusia and PGA West approximately 1 mile north of the site South • BLM (Martinez Slide) — Open Space/Wilderness Area and CVMSHCP Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area East • Vacant Land owned by: o Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) o Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) o Bureau of Land Management (BLM) o Private vacant lands are directly adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site o The Trilogy Golf Club at La Quinta is approximately 2,500 feet northeast of the intersection of Madison and Avenue 62 West • Vacant, private lands • BLM - Open Space/Wilderness and CVMSHCP Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area • BLM and BOR (Guadalupe Channel), managed and maintained by CVWD 1-6 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 679 1.0 INTRODUCTION Exhibit 1.2 — Regional Location Map C.-c YA . : vil�t R1. y„f ' rl.n wwa wow. t yd 0, RANCHO MIRAGE a, .. ri., ❑,PALM DEfSERT L F7 �]ni Fr• 7 INDIAN WELLS � A+.nun St h .ei u Sri .10.-nlr �nunPln. • wion.i uon;nw6� 1619111zIII. was] a:4LTAAZ611a] 9 INDIO wr. .7 --T-A-mi� OACHELLA Otn a A. PROJECT SITE; g Q 3 1-7 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 680 1.0 INTRODUCTION Exhibit 1.3 - Vicinity Map °JN©IAN WELL llT� ee '"' F�" .1f w �INDIjr s �F We CUACHE:LLA-, Of -i •� - �� k(Q' I TA EL A _ �• � - .�_ _ � � ram, �. >' �--;� Ali an 4 Atom � •' r r��r� �,, of � '��j' - ' � yyam�'' � -e '1 �•• ,� - Santa Rasa}r Mountains r PROJECT 51TE -- •: - Martinez -Rack Slide • +- -1r�;• = � J-�, •.. ter- 4• y�. ram;-;ri'igtaf3lvCe �ebE}e,:artn�ar�ee§ �hiCS, GIttS�:ufCus�S, 1-8 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 681 1.0 INTRODUCTION Exhibit 1.4 — Site Location Map a •:.: ,x r -�-- Dike 2 28 E .,) IRA ram° La Quinta i J. County of i Riverside. ,f ': 1• _ AlL ' 1 r ��af__� . ram. f. - �+-.: 4+�. - �..� ..�- �r . �y�� • — . �� . � ....�� - — _ ._ LEGEND $ecli9n Lines' � lily Of La QUinW BoumMry °rh8Puhli0Lanu8umy9vs1em{PL88j Swllm—cro-vgJa,e-m�lv BlvcL of lehd. ConlB�nlry 5a6 Agar. el aapon�mElp}r o. ldiny-aulh of a -hip. Dud m lh. ¢�N0- of & E.M. 44Oi--p Section Line Numbers ozasionallr he 51HOU7 m,allrr Ihan ann svun�c mil. Project Bau nfty Fmm I1505 T.5 Mlnu[B 30MB hw m0unleln Qmdmiq ha. CA 2015 1-9 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 682 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.5 Project Objectives The physical design for Travertine is based on the fundamental principles of good community form, utilizing the sites' natural form; and the protection or mitigation of environmental constraints now identified as present on the site. To ensure the successful interpretation and implementation of these ideas, the plan's design goals and principles have been distilled down to the following primary principles for this Specific Plan Amendment: 1. To develop a mixed -use master planned community, to include varying housing densities and housing product types, with associated recreational amenities such as, and not limited to, trails and parkland. 2. To facilitate the attainment of the City's Regional Housing Needs Allocation targets for new residential construction. 3. To preserve or mitigate impacts to sensitive biological resources in a manner consistent with current Federal, State and local requirements. 4. To develop a project that will generate a sustainable, diversified increase to the City's tax revenue stream, resulting in a project that is economically successful for the City as well as the master developer. 5. Provide for the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the community and environs from flooding and hydrological hazards. 1.6 Existing Conditions The site lies on an alluvial fan made up of material deposited by drainages emanating from the Santa Rosa Mountains. The Travertine property is comprised of broad, gently sloping terrain that is typical of the western portions of the Coachella Valley. A cultivated vineyard once occupied most of the northern portion of the project site, but has been abandoned since 2007. The existing infrastructure on the project site is very limited as the site has not been previously developed, and only the former vineyard area was provided with water from three privately owned on -site wells. Section 5 contains detailed descriptions of proposed infrastructure. The Travertine project will be served by Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) for domestic water. The site contains three existing privately -owned wells used when the vineyard was active. Additional offsite wells will be developed by the applicant in coordination with CVWD. The nearest Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) sewer connection to the project site currently exists at Monroe Street and Avenue 62. CVWD has completed a preliminary analysis of the Travertine Development that will be used to ensure the size and capacity of the future infrastructure will be adequate to accommodate the estimated project flows. Ultimately flows will discharge into CVWD's Water Reclamation Plant No. 4 in Thermal. The site is currently served with electrical power from the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). Power from this source was used when the vineyard was last active (2007) to pump irrigation water from three existing privately -owned wells. IID will supply electricity to the development within the Travertine Specific Plan area. Natural gas will be provided to the site by Southern California Gas Company through the extension of natural gas infrastructure via Avenue 62 over Dike #4. Currently there is no natural gas provided on site. 1-10 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 683 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.7 Project Site History The project site is located on an alluvial fan emanating from the Santa Rosa Mountains in the southeast portion of the City of La Quinta. The only known land use of the site can be seen in an area near the center of the site, see Exhibit 1.3; this area was used as a vineyard that included grape vines, irrigation lines, access roads. The vineyard is no longer active and appears to have ceased operation sometime in 2005- 2006. In 1988-1989 the project site was part of a proposed land exchange, the Toro Canyon Land Exchange, between the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the Nature Conservancy, to dispose of public lands that would be more suitable for development in exchange for private land further to the south that provides important habitat for Bighorn Sheep. An EA was prepared for the land exchange. The EA concluded that the private land offered in the exchange would now be protected as federal resources in support of Bighorn Sheep and critical habitat. Also, as part of the land exchange, the Travertine project site would be available for development in accordance with the land use planning designations imposed by the City of La Quinta. The exchange consisted of the following: • Five sections of land within the Santa Rosa Mountains, four sections owned by Travertine property owners and one section owned by the Nature Conservancy; together comprising 3,207 acres within the Santa Rosa Mountain National Scenic Area, offered to the BLM. • One section of land owned by the BLM comprising approximately 639 acres offered to the Travertine property owners. • Upon approval of the Toro Canyon land exchange, the 639 acres were combined with approximately 270 acres of adjacent acres to create the Travertine project site for a total of approximately 909 acres of developable land. The County of Riverside included the Travertine project site within its Eastern Coachella Valley Community Plan (ECVCP). The ECVCP land use designation for the site's lower elevation - the flatter portions of the site - was "Planned Residential Reserve". This designation was intended to allow for large scale, self- contained Resort/Spa communities. The steeper portions of the site were designated as "Mountainous Areas" in the ECVCP where limited land uses permitted in areas covered by this designation included Open Space, limited recreational uses, limited single family residential, landfills and resource development. Once the Toro Canyon land exchange was approved, the City of La Quinta began annexation proceedings with the county of Riverside for the Travertine project site. The annexation was completed in 1993 with the project site designated as Low Density Residential (LDR, 2 to 4 du/ac) and Open Space (1 du/ac) land uses. In June 1995, the Travertine Specific Plan was approved and an EIR was certified by the La Quinta City Council by adoption of Resolutions 1995-38 and 1995-39, subject to conditions of approval and a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP). Along with the Specific Plan, the corresponding General Plan Amendment and Change of Zone were also approved. The Specific Plan identified a number of land uses including varying densities of residential development, neighborhood commercial, tourist commercial, and golf course open space. In June 1999, the La Quinta Planning Commission re -approved the Specific Plan for the Travertine project site to allow for an indefinite extension of time to develop the site with adoption of Resolution 1999-061. 1.7.1 Required Additional Studies After Specific Plan Approval Following the Plan's extension of time in 1999, the additional environmental studies required by the 1995 EIR began. In June 2004, a request was submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) to initiate a Section 7 consultation regarding the impacts to the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep and its designated critical habitat. A Biological Opinion (BO) was completed by the USFWS in December 2005 1-11 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 684 1.0 INTRODUCTION that evaluated the biological resources on the project site in a Biological Assessments (BA). The Travertine property owners had acquired several areas off -site to preserve open space habitat for the Bighorn Sheep and had proposed several mitigation measures in the time between the initial Specific Plan approval (1995) and the start of the Section 7 consultations (2005). The BO concluded that the mitigation measures proposed by Travertine, including the setbacks from habitat and the types of vegetation allowed near the southern and western property lines, would be appropriate for the preservation of any critical habitat that existed in the area and that the development of the site as previously approved, would not interfere with the Bighorn Sheep or its critical habitat (Exhibit 1.5) 1-12 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 685 1.0 INTRODUCTION Exhibit 1.5 — Conservation Area LEGEND ® Coachella Valley Witiple Species Habitat) Projed Boundary Critical Hahltal Bundary [USFWS"] .'.•. Restricted Open Space 'LSFW. - UWd St t. FIM mE WWI& 5 e,M. F—Canehd.4all"KSHCP• Como d— Area aounaarr wwi crm�hco wu 1-13 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 686 1.0 INTRODUCTION Implementation of the 1995 Specific Plan required the acquisition of additional right-of-way along the major roadways (Jefferson Street, Madison Street, and Avenue 62) from the Bureau of Land Management and the Bureau of Reclamation. This resulted in the need for another federal Environmental Assessment (EA No. CA-600-06-28) to be prepared and circulated. This EA was adopted in 2006. Archaeological/paleontological surveys and a jurisdictional delineation were both completed as part of this EA process in addition to other special studies to evaluate the impacts of project development. The consultations with the agencies and related documentation resulted in several recommended mitigation measures that the project proponent was required to incorporate into the project. The project proponent also worked closely with the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG) to ensure that the proposed land uses were compatible with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). Development of the project site is considered a "Covered Activity," as long as the following measures are retained in the design of the project (Fish and Wildlife ERIV — 2735.3): • The Specific Plan authorized disturbance must stay outside the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area. • The remainder of the property within the Specific Plan area and inside the Conservation Area will be preserved and undisturbed in perpetuity. • The project proponent committed to providing a no interest loan to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission to acquire essential Peninsular Bighorn Sheep habitat in the project area if needed. • The project proponent was to provide additional fees for Bighorn Sheep monitoring and research. In 2007, the project proponent continued to work through the Conditions of Approval and Mitigation Measures by authorizing the completion of a Cultural Resources Inventory and Evaluation (2006), including limited subsurface testing on the project site. As part of this effort, four local Native -American tribes were contacted for comment regarding their knowledge of cultural resources in the area. The Torres -Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians indicated awareness of several cultural resources in close proximity to the project site and requested a Native -American monitor be present during any ground disturbing activities. Also, during 2007, a Supplemental Cultural Resources Survey Report was prepared to evaluate the access road from the extension of Madison Street and access road from the extension of Jefferson Street. Results for both areas were negative for prehistoric and historic -era resources. As a result of all three surveys, the Specific Plan Land Use Plan and other plans (circulation, infrastructure) were designed to avoid areas that were found to have cultural and paleontological sensitivity. See Exhibit 1.5 Conservation Areas (Restricted Open Space designation). In summary, as a result of the additional studies conducted as required by the original EIR, sensitive habitat and cultural resource areas have been identified and other areas identified as necessary to accommodate and manage storm waters across the site have been proposed in this Amended Specific Plan as open space areas. 1-14 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 687 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.8 Relationship to the City General Plan As a part of the project, the City will consider the approval of a General Plan Amendment changing certain provisions of the City's General Plan to provide for the development of Specific Plan. The concurrent approval of this General Plan Amendment will ensure the project's consistency with the City's General Plan. The General Plan Amendment is discussed below. 1.8.1 Land Use Element The General Plan Amendment will change the land use configurations of General Plan Land Use Map for the project area for the following designations: Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Tourist Commercial (including Resort/Spa Mixed Use), and Open Space. Table 2 — Land Use Plan Comparison Existing General Plan Proposed General Plan General Plan Designation Acres Units Acres Units Low Density Residential 382.2 1526 318.0 758 Medium / High Residential 84.4 774 60.8 442 Tourist Commercial 30.9 84.5 Open Space - Recreation 365.3 55.9 Open Space -Natural 12.2 301.2 Major Community Facilities 4.1 General Commercial 10.0 Master Planned Roadways 20.1 35.0 Total 909.2 2,300 855.4 1,200 1-15 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 688 1.0 INTRODUCTION Exhibit 1.6.1— Existing General Plan Land Use Map Existing General Plan General Plan Designation Acres Units Low Density Residential 382.2 1526 Medium / High Residential 84.4 774 Tourist Commercial 30.9 Open Space - Recreation 355.3 Open Space -Natural 12.2 Major Community Facilites 4.2 General Commercial 10.0 Master Planned Roadways 20.1 Total gom 230n yi Martinez I I Rack Slide EGEND Law Densily Residential © Tourist Commercial _ Major Community Facilil.ies 0 Proposed Specific Plan Boundary _ RWiumftgh penalty Reaidanlial Open Space - Reorealion Existing Specific Plan Boundary _ General Commarcial Open Space - Natural 1-16 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 689 EGEND Law Densily Residential © Tourist Commercial _ Major Community Facilil.ies 0 Proposed Specific Plan Boundary _ RWiumftgh penalty Reaidanlial Open Space - Reorealion Existing Specific Plan Boundary _ General Commarcial Open Space - Natural 1-16 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 689 1.0 INTRODUCTION Exhibit 1.6.2 — Proposed General Plan Land Use Map LEGEND 0 Law Density Residential 0 Open Space • Recreation Proposed Speoifc Plan Boundary _ Medium I High Density Residential Open Space - Natural _ Tourist comimerci®t 1-17 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 690 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.8.2 Circulation Element The General Plan Amendment will also change the General Plan Roadway Classification Map of the General Plan as follows: • The removal of Madison Street as a General Plan Roadway from Avenue 60 to Avenue 62. Instead, this road alignment will be utilized as an emergency vehicle access (EVA) for the project. • The adopted alignment of Jefferson Street within the project boundaries. Exhibit 1.6.3 - Existing and Proposed General Plan Roadway Classification f yrmririm Sphere of Influence woo Primary Arterial soon Secondary Arteriai Modified5econdary ......•• Collector Arterial -°=O Urban Arterial - I Proposed �i S11 M � � i O � 0 1-18 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 691 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.9 Zoning Map Amendment The City of La Quinta's Official Zoning Map is proposed to be modified to correspond with the land use areas and designations reflected in this Amendment. Table 3 - Zoning Plan Comparison Existing Zoning Plan Proposed Zoning Plan Zoning Acres Units Acres Units Low Density Residential 382.2 1526 318.0 758 Medium Density Residential 60.8 442 Medium / High Residential 84.4 774 Neighborhood Commercial 10.0 Tourist Commercial 30.9 84.5 Golf Course 377.5 Open Space 4.1 357.1 Master Planned Roadways 20.1 35.0 Total 909.2 2,300 855.4 1,200 1-19 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 692 1.0 INTRODUCTION Exhibit 1.7.1 — Existing Zoning Plan Existi Zpnin Plan Zoning Acres Units Low Density Residentlal 382.2 1526 Medium Density Residential Medium j High Residential 84.4 774 Neighborhood Commercial 10.0 Tourist Camrnermi 1 30.9 Golf Course 377.5 Open Space 4.1 Master Pia nned Roadways 1 20A Total 1 909-2 2300 LEGEND ® Low density Residential _ Tourist Commercial Proposed Specific Plan Boundary _ Medium High Density Residential _ GoH Course Existing Specific Plan Boundary Gib Neighborhood Commercial _ Open Space 1-20 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 693 1.0 INTRODUCTION Exhibit 1. Z2 — Proposed Zoning Plan — I PROPOSED JEFFERSON STREET - Proposed Zoning Plan Zoning Acres Units Low Density Residential 318.0 758 Medium density Residential 60.8 442 Medium/ High Residential Neighborhood Commercial 84.5 357.1 35.0 855A 1200 i, .l I at�r my rF �� LEGEND RL La* Dansrty Residential _ Open Space Proposed Specific Plan Boundary Medium Densily Residential _ Fowls[ Commercial 1-21 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 694 2.0 LAND USE 2 LAND USE This section identifies the development standards applicable to each planning area with the Travertine development; this includes the project description, land use descriptions, permitted uses and requirements. The design and land use plan address City of La Quinta community planning goals and concepts as well as aligning with community wide conservation and design. 2.1 Project Description and Summary As illustrated in Exhibit 2.1, the Travertine development will be comprised of a variety of land uses that are broken down into planning areas. Residential land uses will range from low density to medium density. A resort/spa facility will serve tourists and recreational visitors. A golf training/practice facility and banquet facility will provide recreational opportunities. Some related commercial uses will be combined with the resort/spa and golf facility to serve the daily needs of the community and its visitors. Table 4 identifies the overall land use summary planned for the property. Table 5 provides a summary of the land uses by planning area. Table 4: Land Use Summary Land Use Acres Percent Residential 378.8 ac 44.3% Resort/Golf and Banquet 84.5 ac 9.9% Facilities Master Planned Roadways 35.0 ac 4.1% Open Space Uses 357.1 ac 41.7% Total 855.4 ac 100% 2.1.1 Land Use Plan Description The Conceptual Land Use Plan is illustrated in Exhibit 2.1. The Travertine Land Use Plan incorporates a broad range of uses consistent with a master planned community by providing: • A mix of public and private uses, • A pattern of residential neighborhoods defined by interconnected loop streets linked by an extensive trail system, • Access to open space via pedestrian walkways and bike paths, • A moderately curvilinear primary street pattern connecting to local streets as the street system connects the Medium and Low -Density Residential neighborhoods within the Travertine community, • Sidewalks and bike lanes throughout the Travertine community with a Class II bike lane located along both sides of Jefferson Street, • A central walking path system to connect the community from north to south, • A trail system that circumnavigates the project and connects with the interior strolling trails, • Two recreational community parks for both passive and active uses, as well as local pocket parks within neighborhoods • A golf training facility that provides a Golf Academy and a 4-hole training course. 2-1 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 695 2.0 LAND USE Exhibit 2.1—Travertine Specific Plan Land Use Plan ... AVENUE 58 1 J I A CORA[, CANYON {EL.'7UREf �1 � a Cora l y Mcrltlllai?1 ❑Ike 4 "� PRQAOSFOJFFFFRSQN _- _.ram ��_- leiniaaHs* 1-:3IkI ns te.inL f-oPPSi aasu - PA.-V NAP N AP. ASGF116 ii.[ac PAi fWk am DU mou Lou .A s0.aaA c vw t; s d! [OOFSTREE7..'� . WEST m.t a%i sec vAGCE58. " l 1Ac fl,W +er+c PAn# -05 Du COlunaWTY � v �h1] IPi pS M7AL aO,.I m Rock Slide AVENOE60 �L J xs �c C:OMMUNi7r 1 Pea_. 7TRK EA37 . vPAARa r _ :.•: t 14 Du �= — .. wAoceas >'m "Ac ]5,v_ OEA�BC tat AL NEIORIidRF i ' A°v 't 'ham LEGEND 0 Low Density ReWentlal - 318 Ac 0 Open Space 1 Recreattonal - 55 S Ac 0 Medium Density Re5i4en1ial. 60A Ac jjj� Open Space ! Natural • 301.2 Ac Total Acreage- 855.4 Ac 0 Resort - Golf Club - 84.5 Ac [� Master Planned Roadways - 35.0AG 2-2 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 696 2.0 LAND USE Table 5: Planning Area Summary Planning Area Summary PA Land Use Acres I Resort / Spa 38.3 2 Medium Density Residential 25.9 3 Low Density Residential 29.4 4 Low Density Residential 9.6 5 Low Density Residential 16.2 6 Medium Density Residential 20.1 7 Low Density Residential 18.7 8 Low Density Residential 16.9 9 Medium Density Residential 14.8 10 Low Density Residential 25.6 11 Resort / Golf 46.2 12 Low Density Residential 52.2 13 Low Density Residential 26.7 14 Low Density Residential 39.0 15 Low Density Residential 33.3 16 Low Density Residential 50.4 17 Open Space Recreation 18.1 18 Open Space Recreation 14.7 19 Open Space Recreation 23.1 20 Open Space Natural 301.2 21 Master Planned Roadways 35.0 TOTALS 855.4 Master Planned Roadways Acres Jefferson 17.1 N.A.P Access 0.2 Loop West 9.7 Loop East 5.5 Section 5 Access 0.2 Madison EX. A. 1.5 PA Access 0.8 TOTAL 35.0 2-3 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 697 2.0 LAND USE 2.1.2 Open Space Approximately 357.1-acres or 41.7% of the Amended Travertine Specific Plan area are designated as open space, including both natural open space and recreational open space uses (Planning Areas 17-20). Approximately 55.9-acres of the site are planned for Open Space — Recreation uses. Designed to offer both passive and active oriented recreational opportunities, areas planned for Open Space — Recreation include picnic tables, barbeques, golf facilities, a tot lot playground, and staging facilities for the regional interpretive trail. Natural Open Space accounts for approximately 301.2-acres predominately along the southern boundary of the property. 2.1.3 Recreational Trails The Specific Plan proposes two types of recreational trails — one system within the community and one encircling the perimeter of the community. The core inter -community network is a spine trail, which provides a direct link to community open spaces and gathering areas, as well as passive and active spaces. This 5.3-mile system also provides connectivity from the individual residential homes along internal local streets and bikeways along Jefferson Street. The Community Grand Loop Trail will include a staging area, located to the south of the extension of Avenue 62 that will provide parking and public access to 5-mile loop of an interpretive stations, rest stops and scenic vistas that will circumnavigate the project boundary, as seen in Exhibit 2.2. Natural open space areas will largely be protected areas, however the community perimeter trail will provide view opportunities and potentially interpretive kiosks, for the public to experience these areas. 2-4 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 698 2.0 LAND USE Exhibit 2.2 — Recreation Plan r Dike 2 gym .� .. — AVEhVE58 -L 1 l Coral v'r'1 STREET '� •� AVEAVESO r 1VAA x� l L ZI PARK CAST •_L44P STREEr�� ' 1.• �.. 15elt" Rock Slick LEGEND © Boo Noff Trail 0 Iraerconnector Trai I 0 Open Space 1 Nalural CommunilY Grand Loop Trail Class II Bi ke Trail Community Parks © Strolling Trail Dpen space I fleoreaiionm Tradhead 2-5 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 699 2.0 LAND USE 2.1.4 Roadways The development of Travertine provides for substantial improvements to several public roadways, including the southerly extension of Jefferson Street as a Modified Secondary Arterial south of the proposed Coral Canyon property and the westerly extension of Avenue 62, also as a Modified Secondary Arterial. The right-of-way corridor for Madison Street will be improved as an emergency vehicle access (EVA) connecting the Travertine development area Avenue 60. Loop roads emanating east and west from the Jefferson Road spine via two roundabout intersections will be privately maintained. The loop road entries into residential areas will be gated and will serve as collector roads to access the individual residential neighborhoods. Collectively, the roadway system has been designated as Planning Area 21 for the purposes of tracking overall acreage of the Specific Plan area. 2.1.5 Residential Residential areas (Planning Areas 2 through 10 and 12 through 16) account for approximately 44.3% of the amended project's total land area. Low Density Residential Planning Areas will vary in density from 1.5 du/ac to 4.5 du/ac. Medium Density Residential will vary in density from 4.5 du/ac to 8.5 du/ac. The overall project proposes a maximum of 1,200 dwelling units based on range of lot sizes, with an overall average density for the project of 1.4 du/ac. In conformance with project goals, several housing styles are proposed to appeal to a range of future Travertine residents. The residential lot layouts are designed to reflect the project site's natural character by minimizing areas proposed for grading and softening the slopes between the residential pads. The Travertine residential products will provide a variety of options. Six residential types are proposed: • Estate Homes • Single Family Luxury Homes • Single Family Large Homes • Single Family Mid Homes • Patio Homes Small Lot • Single Family Attached Units For lot configuration see Exhibit 2.3 for estate and luxury single family detached (SFD) lot configurations; Exhibit 2.4 for large and mid SFD lot configurations and Exhibit 2.5 for small SFD and single family attached unit lot configurations. 2-6 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 700 2.0 LAND USE Exhibit 2.3 - Lot Configuration Estate and Luxury Single Family Detached 72.5' MIN. 70' MIN. I I I i I I I i 25' M1N. ! LU w110 .5I7 CO L 7. ' 7. 100, MIN. TYP. RESIDENTIAL ROAD 18' `With Side T _ _ I _ Load Garage ESTATE LOTS MIN LOT: 9,000 SQ. FT. MIN. WIDTH: 70' MIN. DEPTH: 100' 62.5' MIN. 60, MIM I I I i 20'MIN. LLLL 4 110' Q .517 5+ 7. 51 F~ CO 100' MIN. AA 1 AA 3' o I I 15' M1N. 18' M! I 15' MIN. I TYP. RESIDENTIAL ROAD - `With Side Load Garage LUXURY SFD LOTS MIN LOT: 7,000 SQ. FT. MIN_ WIDTH: 60' MIN. DEPTH: 100' 2-7 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 701 2.0 LAND USE Exhibit 2.4 — Lot Configuration Large and Mid SFD w W H W W H [n 60' MIN. 55' MIN. � ---------1---15 II MIN.---�-------- 110f5i5 5F i 0A Fl►l1Km_ mI 15, 100, MIN TYP. RESIDENTIAL ROAD 1s' `With Side Load Garage LARGE SFD LOTS MIN. LOT.' 6,000 SQ. FT. MIN. WIDTH: 55' MIN. DEPTH: 100' TYP_ RESIDENTIAL ROAD 18' -- MID SFD LOTS MIN_ LOT 5,500 SQ, FT MIN. WIDTH: 50' MIN. DEPTH: 90' 2-8 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 702 2.0 LAND USE Exhibit 2.5 - Lot Configuration Small and Single Family Attached 50' MIN. 45' MIN. 15' MIN. 4 L � ' 10 515 515 5' e. LU 80' ' MIN. J -F� 10' MIN. M -F] £4: TYP. RESIDENTIAL ROAD SMALL LOT SFD MIN. LOT.' 5,000 SQ. FT. MIN. WIDTH: 45' MIN. DEPTH: 80' 37.5' MIN. 35' MIN. W10' — — -- 'MIN. LU 10 .5'7. 7.,' 70' MIN. AA 5 MlN. 5 MIN. 18, �{ TYP. RESIDENTIAL ROAD SINGLE FAMIL Y A TTA CHED UNITS MIN. LOT. 4,000 SQ. FT. MIN. WIDTH. 35' MIN. DEPTH: 70' 2-9 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 703 2.0 LAND USE 2.1.6 Tourist Serving Recreational Facilities Planning Areas 1 and 11 will provide for Tourist Serving Recreational Facilities. Planning Area 1 is planned for a luxury resort and wellness spa, with 100 guest villas, on the approximately 38.3-acre site located at the northwest entrance to the project from Jefferson Street. This area will consist of resort related amenities including restaurants, small shops, spa facilities, lounge and activity rooms, outdoor activities; tennis, yoga, walking and hiking trails. The proposed amendment would allow fractional ownership/time-share development in the tourist commercial zones (PA 1 & 11) with the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. The hotel/resort wellness center proposes 100 guest villas or rooms within the planning area. Within PA 11, a golf academy with related 4-hole practice course is located near the southeastern entry to the project on approximately 46.2 acres. This will provide a high -end practice facility, entertainment/ banquet facilities and wedding gardens for both the residents and guests. 2-10 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 704 2.0 LAND USE 2.2 Development Regulations & Standards The following section describes the development regulations and standards for Low Density Residential, Medium Density Residential, Resort/Spa Mixed Use, and Open Space land use categories. The land use character within the Planning Areas is intended to facilitate estate living, medium density villa -style life, and a Resort/Spa and tourist orientation. All three categories are anticipated to be implemented via a range of lot sizes. The regulations and standards contained within this Plan shall apply to all development proposals with the Specific Plan area. Whenever the Specific Plan is silent on any development regulations or standards, the City's Municipal Code will apply. 2.2.1 Low Density Residential- Planning Areas 3-5, 7, 8, 10, & 12-16 The Low Density Residential (1.5-4.5 du/ac) category will be characterized by larger single-family detached residential lots (from 5,500 to 9,000 square feet or greater) with the opportunity for custom homes. These homes will have the largest setbacks in the development, as well as the smallest maximum lot coverage. A community park with recreational facilities is located in Planning Area S and is linked by pedestrian trail to the community center facilities located in Planning Area 13. 2.2.1.1 Permitted Uses Permitted uses in the Low Density Residential areas of the Specific Plan will conform to those listed in Municipal Code Chapter 9.40 Residential Permitted Uses. The following uses require a conditional use permit: • Mobile home subdivisions and manufactured homes on individual lots, subject to Section 9.60.180 2-11 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 705 2.0 LAND USE 2.2.1.2 Development Standards Any of the products listed in Table 6 can be built in any of the Low -Density Residential planning areas. The development standards applicable to any individual residential lot will be a function of the lot's area, subject to limited exceptions permitted and described in Section 5 Implementation Measures and Administration. Table 6: Development Standards for in Low Density Planning Areas Product Estate Luxury SFD Large SFD Mid SFD Minimum Lot Size 9,000 sq. ft. 7,000 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. 5,500 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width, Detached' 70 feet 60 feet 55 feet 50 feet Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 90 feet Minimum Cul-de-Sac 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Lot Width Maximum Structure Height 2 22 feet 22 feet 28 feet 28 feet Maximum Number of 2 2 2 2 Stories Minimum Front Yard 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Setback Minimum Garage 18 feet 18 feet 18 feet 18 feet Setback' Minimum Interior Side Yard Setbacks' 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Minimum Exterior Side Yard Setbacks' 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard 25 feet 20 feet 15 feet 5 feet Setback Maximum Lot Coverage 35% 35% 40% 45% 'The Design and Development Director can administratively approve modifications of the standards up to 15% to account for irregular lotting situations. Please refer to the City of La Quinto Municipal Code Section 9.50.0701rregular lots, for irregular lot specifications. 2Building height will be measured from finished building pad elevation. 'A11 setbacks are measured from the property line. Side -loaded garages may encroach up to 5 feet into the front yard setback. °Mechanical equipment shall be allowed within side yard setback area with a minimum three-foot clearance to the side property line. 'Exterior (Perimeter) Streets for the Travertine Specific Plan area are Loop Street East and West, Jefferson Street, Avenue 62 and the Madison EVA. 2-12 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 706 2.0 LAND USE 2.3.2 Medium Density Residential — Planning Areas 2, 6, and 9 Planning Area 2, 6 and 9 are located to the north of Jefferson Street. These are designated Medium Density Residential reflecting the transition between the lower density golf, residential housing and open space development and the resort/spa development. The Medium Density Residential Planning Areas are intended to provide medium density (4.5-8.5 du/ac) single-family residential products to accommodate residents seeking lots ranging from 4,000 to 5,775 square feet in size. The development standards in Table 5 provide for a characteristic medium -density residential neighborhood. 2.3.2.1 Permitted Uses Permitted and prohibited use shall conform to Municipal Code Chapter 9.40 Residential Permitted Uses, for Planning Areas 2, 6 and 9. 2.3.2.2 Development Standards Either of the two products listed in Table 7 can be built in any of the Medium -Density Residential planning areas, as determined by the individual lot size. Limited exceptions may be approved as described in Section 5, Density Transfer Provisions. Table 7., Development Standards for Medium Density Planning Areas Product Small Lot SFD Single Family Attached Lot Size 5,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width, Detached 1 45 feet 35 feet Minimum Lot Depth 1 80 feet 70 feet Minimum Cul-de-Sac Lot Width 35 feet 35 feet Maximum Structure Height 2 28 feet 28 feet Maximum Number of Stories 2 2 Minimum Front Yard Setback 10 feet 15 feet Minimum Garage Setback 18 feet 5 feet Rear Yard Setbacks 15 feet 10 feet Minimum Interior Side Yard Setbacks' 5 feet 7.5 feet Minimum Exterior Side Yard Setbacks5 10 feet 10 feet Maximum Lot Coverage 55% 55% 'The Design and Development Director can administratively approve modifications of the standards up to 15% to account for irregular lotting situations. Please refer to the City of La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.50.070 Irregular lots, for irregular lot specifications. 'Building height will be measured from finished building pad elevation. 'All setbacks are measured from the property line 'Mechanical equipment shall be allowed within side yard setback area with a minimum three-foot clearance to the side property line. 5 Exterior (Perimeter) Streets for the Travertine Specific Plan area are Loop Street East and West, Jefferson Street and Avenue 62. 2-13 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 707 2.0 LAND USE 2.3.3 Resort (Tourist Commercial) — Planning Areas 1 and 11 Planning Area 1 is located in the northern portion of the site and anticipated to provide 100-villas and wellness spa. Planning Area 11 is located in the southern portion of the site and anticipated to provide a golf training/practice facility with a golf academy, banquet facilities and a four -hole training golf course. Both are planned to be a part of a resort and/or golf related use. Site Development Permits will be submitted as needed by the future developers of the Hotel/Resort and Golf Facilities including any fractional ownership options. Any of the products listed in Table 6 and 7 can be built in any of the Tourist Commercial planning areas. For lot configurations of the resort villas, see Exhibit 2.6. The Travertine Specific Plan permits a maximum of 1,200 dwelling units to be constructed. If Planning Areas 1 and/or 11 develop(s) with residential housing, these dwelling units will be counted toward the maximum of 1,200 units. Transfer of Dwelling Units may occur according to the provisions provided in Section 5. This area will be subject to review through the Tentative Tract Map process or a Site Development Permit process. The maximum number of units allowed in the Travertine Specific Plan may not be exceeded without a formal amendment to the Specific Plan. 2.3.3.1 Permitted Uses Permitted uses in Planning Area 1 and 11 will conform with those listed in Municipal Code Chapter 9.80 Nonresidential Permitted Uses (Tourist Commercial), except as modified herein. Resort Residential uses shall be permitted for Planning Areas 1 and 11, in addition Resort Villas shall be permitted without a conditional use permit. Short-term Vacation Rentals shall be permitted with appropriate permits and licenses per Section 3.25 of the Municipal Code. The following uses shall require a conditional use permit in Planning Areas 1 and 11: • Printing, blueprinting and copy services. • Medical offices —physicians, dentists, optometrists, chiropractors and similar practitioners, 3 or fewer offices in one building • Restaurants, drive -through • Townhome and multifamily dwelling as a primary use (any approved units to be included in the 1,200 maximum) The development standards for Planning Areas 1 and 11 shall be those as defined in Municipal Code Section 9.90.040 (Tourist Commercial), except as follows: Table 8: Development Standards for Villas Product Villas Minimum lot frontage 30 feet 28 feet Maximum building height' 22 feet adjacent to an image corridor Maximum number of stories 2 Minimum livable reserved floor area excluding 420 sq. ft. garage 2-14 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 708 2.0 LAND USE Minimum front yard setback from: Street or parking stall curb 8 feet Pedestrian circulation walks 5 feet Garage/carport setback -from street curb 5 feet Minimum building to building setback: Without partial attachmentz 6 feet With partial attachmentz 4 feet Minimum interior/exterior side yard setbacks s 3 feet Minimum rear yard setback 15 feet Maximum allowable wall height 8 feet Minimum parking required 1 space per bedroom 1 space per 300 sq. ft. GFA 'Chimneys, roof vents, finials, spires, and similar architectural features not containing usable space are permitted to extend up to three feet above the maximum structure height. 'Partial attachment of two buildings is made when an enclosed area having a typical interior function such as a hot water heater closet furnace closet, or other essential use, is attached to two otherwise separate buildings. Construction standards and fire ratings shall meet U.B.C. requirements. 3 Mechanical equipment shall be allowed within side yard setback areas with a minimum three-foot clearance to the side property line Exhibit 2.6 — Lot Configuration Resort Villas PRIVATE ROAD RESORT VILLAS 2-15 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 709 2.0 LAND USE Table 9: Development Standards for Hotel/Commercial Product Hotel/Commercial Maximum Building Height' 40 feet Maximum Number of Stories 3 stories Maximum Number of Keys 100 Hotel keys Maximum floor area ratio (FAR) 0.5 Minimum perimeter building/landscape setbacks 40/20 feet 'Building height will be measured from finished building pad elevation. 'Building height does not include architectural projections. Architectural projections shall be regulated by Section 9.90.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. A line -of --sight study will be conducted and submitted when the final designs are submitted to the City for design review. 2.3.4 Open Space/Recreation Uses — Planning Areas 17, 18, 19 A conceptual plan for multi -use trail purposes is included in Chapter 4 and shown on Exhibit 2.2. Trails have been provided throughout the community to allow homeowners to access the various neighborhood parks and open space features of the community. 2.3.4.1 Permitted Uses Permitted uses shall conform to those included in Municipal Code Section 9.120.020 Table of Permitted Uses for Parks and Recreation (PR), Golf Course (GC) and Open Space (OS). 2.3.4.2 Development Standards —Open Space/Recreation The Open Space/Recreation area (Exhibit 2.1) will be subject to Section 9.130.010 of the Municipal Code. 2.3.5 Natural Open Space/Restricted Open Space — Planning Area 20 Along the southern, western, and eastern boundaries of the site, there is an area of land that is restricted from development due to the various environmental constraints including biological, geological, and cultural resources (Exhibit 2.2). This area will remain undisturbed to preserve these resources, however the community perimeter trail will provide view opportunities and potentially interpretive kiosks. As part of the recreational plan and trail system, there will be an interpretive trail that will provide signage and educational information along the trail to highlight the site's cultural elements. A cultural resource study has been conducted for the area near the Martinez Rock Slide, and local tribes have been contacted as part of the procedure. This area is designated as a natural open space buffer between the residential development and the open space of the foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains. Portions of the open space/natural area were determined to be of biological importance by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) through the Biological Opinion completed in 2005 and the subsequent federal Environmental Assessment completed in 2006. If new information is obtained regarding these biological resources, it may result in a change in the acreage restricted from disturbance by the USFWS. In this event, any area removed from restricted open space will fall under the open space/recreation category and will be subject to the development standards detailed in Section 2.2.4.1. The developer will be required to obtain a Streambed Alteration Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). A portion of this area is also in a conservation area of the CVMSHCP. Coordination with 2-16 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 710 2.0 LAND USE CVAG will be necessary to site the water tanks in this area. In addition, an all-weather access road will be installed along the western edge of the development for access to Section 5. This is shown in the Circulation plan in Section 4.1. 2.3.5.1 Permitted Uses • Trails, interpretative signs/kiosks along the perimeter of the area only • Permanent structures, with the exception of two water reservoirs, service roadway, underground pipelines and ancillary facilities as allowed through consultation with the US Fish and Wildlife Service, will be prohibited in the Open Space/Natural area. • There will be an access road provided to connect off -site properties in Section 5, to the loop road of the Travertine project. This will be defined by an easement and entitled by the Applicant to allow access to and from the project to Section 5. • All other uses will be prohibited in this area. 2.3.5.2 Development Standards —Open Space/Natural The water reservoir structures, in accordance with Coachella Valley Water District guidelines and direction, will not exceed 50 feet in height, unless a height in excess of 50 feet is specifically required by CVWD. 2.3.5.3 Additional Requirements Development within the Specific Plan will be subject to the CVMSHCP Avoidance, Minimization and Mitigation Measures and any applicable Land Use Adjacency Guidelines (Sections 4.4 and 4.5 respectively of the Final Major Amendment to the CVMSHCP — August 2016). Exterior lighting shall also comply with Section 9.100.150, Outdoor Lighting contained in the City of La Quinta Municipal Code. Lighting and Photometric Plans shall be approved with a Site Development Permit. 2-17 1 Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 711 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3 DESIGN GUIDELINES The guidelines contained in this section identify unifying elements for design of buildings and landscaping within the Travertine development in order to complement its surrounding community. The exhibits provided are intended as conceptual illustrations and do not depict final designs, or plans. 3.1 Purpose and Intent The Design Guidelines have been developed to achieve a high quality, cohesive design concept for the community that will develop within the Travertine Specific Plan. These design guidelines provide the foundation for the design and construction of an aesthetically unified residential and tourist commercial development incorporating the natural environment and the local history of the surrounding area. The design guidelines are intended to: • Ensure the extensive open space elements of the plan are visible and available to all residents. • Assist in implementing the design intent of the Specific Plan by establishing project compatibility among different residential densities and land uses. • Provide a consistent approach to site planning and the design of buildings, streets, signage, walls and fences, lighting, landscaping and other design elements that will endure the life of the community. • Ensure the placement of structures consider the environmental conditions including sun orientation, prevailing winds and on and off -site views. • Ensure the residential development edges are softened by landscape whenever possible. • Promote the orientation of residential products to maximize vistas and access to open space uses. • Offer a variety of residential products, styles and lot configurations that will ease monotony and help to create a pleasing distinction of home types. • Ensure manufactured slopes have varied gradients and where appropriate are shaped to mimic natural landforms. • Provide for a varied street scene by staggering front setbacks and garage orientations. • Ensure all land uses are cohesively situated within the project's natural setting. 3.2 Introduction The Travertine land use plan has been designed to make the most of the benefits of the distinguishing qualities of its location and topography. The land use plan is influenced by and is sensitive to the environment in which the community is located. The Design Guidelines adopted as part of the Travertine Specific Plan consist of two principal components: Landscape Design Elements and Architectural Design Elements. These components define the design concept, physical character and overall design vision of Travertine. The Design Guidelines establish the framework to achieve a harmonious compatibility between the residential neighborhoods and project design features. 3.3 Theme Travertine draws its inspiration from the desert environment in which it is situated. The project's unique setting finds itself at the base of the Santa Rosa mountains and upon completion will be surrounded by permanent open space as a backdrop for this one -of -a -kind community. The large landforms, including the historic Martinez Rock Slide and Coral Mountain, act as an inspiration for theming the project in terms of form, color, and scale. The goal of this project is to provide the highest quality residential and tourist commercial master planned community. 3-11Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 712 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES The Resort/Spa portion of the project will provide a unique setting for wellness. The Resort/Spa will cater to a clientele interested in state-of-the-art holistic healing methods as well as a relaxation therapy that will define this exclusive Resort/Spa. The massing and scale of the Resort/Spa architecture is intended to blend with and mimic the Coral Mountain topography that is the natural backdrop. Architectural designs for the Travertine community may be contemporary or traditional interpretations of the common contemporary desert themed architecture; as long as they are comprised of a consistent and appropriate design vocabulary that is true to the principles of the style and stay within the constraints of location, program, and budget. It is the intention of these guidelines to foster a community of unique environmental design solutions that are appropriate for the project. 3.4 Architectural Design Elements The integrity of the architectural character of the project will be maintained through the application of guidelines stipulated within the plan and throughout the site. When used together the styles should be designed to create a neighborhood character that will be sustainable over time. Each home should contribute to the architectural character of the neighborhood. Design elements such as porches, recessed windows, architectural details and accents, garage configurations and orientations, and articulated elevations are encouraged to enhance individual homes and to promote the overall neighborhood character. The Architectural Guidelines suggest themes compatible with the Coachella Valley character but are not intended to limit expressions of varying architectural styles. The Architectural Guidelines section outlines selected architectural styles and massing by the proposed home types and densities for the project. Examples of six typical home sizes are listed below and styles can be found in Exhibits 3.1-3.7. Low Density Residential • Estate Homes, Exhibit 3.1 • Single Family Luxury, Exhibit 3.2 • Single Family Mid, Exhibit 3.3 • Single Family Entry, Exhibit 3.4 Medium Density Residential • Patio Homes, Exhibit 3.5 • Single Family Attached Units, Exhibit 3.6 Resort Residential and Spa • Villas, Exhibit 3.7 Every development proposal within the Travertine Specific Plan shall be reviewed bythe City of La Quinta to assure its conformance with the intent of the architectural guidelines stated and illustrated within the document. However, other suitable designs proposed that may not be specifically mentioned in this document, may be considered and approved upon a finding by the approving authority that the proposed design is consistent with the initial theme as contained within the Specific Plan. The guidelines below describe general attributes that are common to the architectural examples discussed. These are not intended as regulatory requirements and may be adapted and modified to suit a particular style that creates a richness of diversity in the Specific Plan area. Accordingly, these Design Guidelines are provided as a resource to those involved in the design and implementation of this Specific Plan and illustrative in nature and meant to be flexible and respond to the changes in taste over time. 3-2 TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 713 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Massing and Scale: • The size and scale of the building should be proportionate to the size of the lot and building's setting in compliance with setbacks. • Provide variable setback to different parts of the dwelling unit to encourage vertical and horizontal massing breaks. • Varied garage layouts and floor plan configurations that create more desirable proportions and neighborhood curb appeal. • Projections and recesses that provide shadow and depth. • The addition of balconies or porches is highly encouraged to improve the scale and massing of two-story homes. • The solar orientation of the buildings will be a key consideration in the design in order to reduce the impact of the development on the local utilities. Building Articulation: • The roof ridgelines, heights and slopes of the homes should be appropriate to the intended architectural style. • Design elements such as fireplaces and chimneys add interest with added articulation to home designs. Porches, Balconies, Stoops, and Decks: • Front porches, balconies, covered terraces, courtyards are key elements used to provide outdoor living spaces. • Porches, balconies and covered terraces should be authentic to the architectural style of the home. • Porches, balconies and covered terraces should be in proportion to the scale of the building. • Decks and balconies should be of adequate size to serve as outdoor spaces. • Decks and balconies of adjacent homes should be staggered to protect privacy of neighbors and • Decks and balcony posts, trims and balustrade railings shall be consistent with the architectural style of the home 3.4.1 Color The proposed architectural color motif will be desert compatible, using a palette of earth tones. This harmonious and pleasing palette will be completed with a variety of accents, roof tones and textures, with complementary window moldings and architectural detailing. The predominantly earth tone structure colors will range from beiges, gray -green tones, mauves, whites, creams, tan, sand, light browns, and similar earth tones. 3.4.2 Materials Roofing material shall be compatible with architectural features and resistant to the harsh desert climate. In addition, stucco, rock fagade, tile, and materials resistant to the desert environment will be utilized in the construction of the buildings onsite. Energy efficiency will be a major consideration when designing the homes and buildings in the development. Unsuitable materials, such as unprotected exposed metal, equipment and venting, unprotected wood, and vinyl, will be prohibited. Examples of materials that may be used are found in Exhibit 3.8. 3-31Panc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 714 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.1 — Estate Homes r. --------: - r141. Rk :1 cab - r" 3-41Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 715 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.2 — Single Family Luxury Homes i 3-51Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 716 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.3 - Single Family Mid Homes 3-61Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 717 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.4 — Single Family Entry Home 3-71Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 718 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.5 — Patio Homes Oliv—, T TSn� a 9 �� 6 ARNOW-- — d 0 Chi �J d Y t.� s 3-81Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 719 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.6 - Single Family Attached Units 3-91Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 720 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.7 — Villas 3-101Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 721 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.8 — Typical Materials Materials will reflect and respond to the Desert enviroments; stone veneers, stucco tile, and other decorative materials will he common. 3-111Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 722 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.5 Landscape Design Elements The primary purpose of the design guidelines for landscape architecture is to ensure that landscape treatments and materials utilized in Travertine will enhance the high -quality aesthetic impression to be achieved while also complementing the physical design and architectural features of the community. It will also be important for the sustainability of the project to consider only those plant materials that utilize minimal amounts of water. The landscape elements are planned to accent entrances and soften hard surfaces and structures. Landscape materials and elements selected should be appropriate for the climate of the area, which includes hot dry summers and moderate winters. All landscape materials are in compliance with CVWD standards. The Landscape Categories Illustrative Exhibit 3.12 identifies the varied landscape areas of the project. Examples of landscape treatments are found in Exhibits 3.13 - 3.26. The experience of both arriving and leaving the Travertine project from the northeast extension of Jefferson Street will be enhanced by the abundance of open space between the dike and the Resort/Spa property. The area between the dike and Resort/Spa will be permanent open space under the control and management of the CVWD. Proximity to the open space will heighten the exclusivity and the feeling of protection provided by this project feature. Generous setbacks will be provided along Jefferson Street and the edges of development. The open space and landscape elements will emulate the simplicity and beauty of the existing environment. The Landscape Design Guidelines section presents general imagery for entries, streetscapes, community slope, parks, trails and project edge conditions. A plant palette provides a specific list of plants that reinforces the community design character, and which is compatible with the surrounding natural open space. The plant lists are organized by plant type and are found in Table 10. The landscape concept focuses on creating a strong relationship with the built environment and the native plant community. Landscape elements will occur throughout the community and unite Travertine under a common design theme and plant palette. General guidelines and design criteria for the community landscape elements are described throughout this section. All landscape plans will be submitted to the City for review and approval. The following Exhibits display conceptual ideas of desert themes and layouts for the Travertine Project. The primary community landscape elements shown in Exhibits 3.11-3.29 are: 1. Main Community Entries, Exhibit 3.11 2. Gated Entries, Exhibit 3.12 3. Typical Landscape and Monumentation, Exhibit 3.13 4. Jefferson Street/Avenue 62 Streetscape, Exhibit 3.14 5. Loop Roads Streetscape, Exhibit 3.15 6. Residential Streetscape, Exhibit 3.16 7. Parcel Landscape Open Space, Exhibit 3.17 8. Community Slope, Exhibit 3.18 9. Open Space and Edge Conditions, Exhibit 3.19 10. On Street Trails, Exhibit 3.20 11. Off -Street Trails, Exhibit 3.21 12. Strolling Trails, Exhibit 3.22 13. Community West Park, Exhibit 3.23 14. Community East Park, Exhibit 3.24 15. Resort & Spa Landscape Concept, Exhibit 3.25 16. Resort and Spa Landscape Illustrative, Exhibit 26 17. Golf Training Facility Landscape Concept, Exhibit 3.27 18. Typical Walls and Fences, Exhibit 3.29 3-121Pagc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 723 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.9 — Overall Landscape Illustrative IiF.hG'H'I "I I.VS �.i.4U N TCA I i 'Je'F.'i 5 N.]'.6F9,.[Y'x17Li_`:ITYCIW&A �+ 'k-j, , -1 I III Z.':., `iJl• ly 1 r �lRf.l Lq':u•L'iq VaP.}. V ��r^. 3-131Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 724 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.10 — Landscape Categories Illustrative - - � �.�5�1 r• tea' - ...L `1._' � � �- I i NAP I LEGEND Jefferson Street Streetscape Parks Golf f 6asin ® Trails • Off Street 0 Loop Road Streetscape Natural Landscape Transition Basin Trails - On Stresl 0 Community Slope Landscape Golf ® Trails- On Street Trailhead 3-141Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 725 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.5.1 Main Community and Gates Entries The extension of the secondary arterial connection between Jefferson and Avenue 62 will be an ungated public road. Gating will occur to serve the uphill and downhill residential portions of the project, both of which are connected to the loop roads, connected to the Jefferson and Avenue 62 arterial road. See Exhibits 3.11 and 3.12. Less formal gates and monumentation are proposed at the entry to the Resort/Spa (PA-1), the golf academy (PA-11), PA-2, and PA-10. The treatment of the gated project entries and the roundabout intersections within the Travertine Specific Plan area establishes the overall community character for the project while forming a design hierarchy. These thematic features are created through a blend of hardscape elements and plant materials which make the first impression for all visitors and residents entering the community. These entry experiences will help define the character of Travertine by complementing the surrounding natural environment, as shown in Exhibit 3.13. 3.5.2 Typical Entry Landscape and Monumentation The family of community entry features starts with the main community entries, on the north end of the project on Jefferson Street and on the east side where Avenue 62 enters the community. Both are similar in form and materials and designed to give a sense of entry into the community. Both consist of a tower element faced in stone topped with a soft light source with grille work. A tile inset detail is in the center of the column. The sign panel is a long horizontal stone -faced panel with the name pinned and backlit on it. In addition, various smaller textured stone panels will accent where the column and the sign panel meet, as shown in Exhibit 3.13. The next group of monumentation is the parcel entries, and three possible types are proposed. All three pick up on the same patterns and form as the main entries but on a much smaller scale. All have planters in the walls and a panel for the parcel name. All the materials in all three entry designs will be selected for their natural look, color, and textures to compliment the desert landscaping and accent plants. 3-151Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 726 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.11 — Main Community Entries NORTH COMMUNITY ENTRY SOUTH MAIN ENTRY I] :A 14 South 3-161Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 727 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.12 — Gated Entries E�GENO --*7 Gated Enlnas W«n Wm w.�,nu�wm 7 GblrlhiUNfTT i0 W ER £L5N1 aW HLAHfEk *H PIAW R MIRY PANEL 3-171Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 728 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.13 — Typical Entry Landscape and Monumentation - _ - - - W1 PANEL (J+ _ COMMlR1iY A]'HEri ELEMEIA r + Eu'IRTIOM {I ��j 49r yy - CC+NAIIHRr�9Y9�ElER�EN' '`��{' ffI I • - !r---_. k RMTER - M]"NRI TOWER ELRWNf 54�NPAKEL PLAWFR kLE'JAllpFl 3-181Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 729 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.5.3 Jefferson Street/Avenue 62 streetscape The main road through Travertine is the Jefferson Street/Avenue 62 corridor. The landscape for this roadway will have a landscaped median planted with rows of California Fan Palms and colorful accents and groundcovers. The California Fan Palms will provide a strong street design statement for the community. An enhanced landscape buffer will border the street on both sides outside of the right-of- way in an area that will be maintained by the Master Property Owners Association. The buffer planting area will vary in width, but have an average width of 25 feet, and will consist of desert flowering trees and colorful desert planting and groundcover with boulder groupings and strong desert accent plants. Where possible, the buffering landscape areas will utilize varying slope ratios. All the median palms will be uplit. See Exhibit 3.14. 3.5.4 Loop Road Streetscape The Loop Road will not have a median. The planting within the right-of-way will have desert theme using colorful shrubs and groundcover with desert accent plants. At intersections with local residential streets, a formal band of color accent trees will be added. Under this formal row of trees will be an understory of plants chosen for their unique colors and forms will complement the formal color tree row above. Where adjacent residential uses are in a side -on position to the Loop Street, an enhanced landscape buffer will be added. Where possible, varying slope ratios within the buffer area will be utilized. See Exhibit 3.15. 3.5.5 Residential Streetscape Overall, the residential streetscape landscape design will be a mixture of native desert plant areas in the majority of the sites along the streets. Smaller areas of more intensive planting will complement more color and lushness in planting where there are intersections, trail and sidewalk intersections, entry features, places where people would congregate, and gated entry areas. See Exhibit 3.16. 3-191Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 730 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.14 - Jefferson Street/Avenue 62 Streetscape *� -4wAlin ---ER" atterson Slreel Streetscape 4 -- - .or-. 3-20IPage TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 731 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.15 — Loop Collector Streetscape LEGEND 0 Loop Road Streetscape 3-211Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 732 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.16 — Residential Streetscape 3-221Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 733 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.5.6 Parcel Landscape Open Space Some parcels at Travertine will have small open area spaces for the residents of that parcel. These areas will have small turf areas surrounded by desert planting with desert trees. Each of these open spaces will have a small shade structure. Specimen desert accent planting will have prominent spots in each of these spaces. See Exhibit 3.17 3.5.7 Community Slope The 5:1 slope will provide the opportunity to have a natural desert look on the slopes. The trails in these slope areas will have a band of more intensive desert planting lining them. Along the trail slopes, trail stops are provided for seating and shade. The more extensive open area slopes will have native soil surface worked and prepared to be more naturalistic, with boulders placed in natural patterns. The planting here will be hydroseeded with a native desert shrub mix. Native desert trees will be added, and they will be on irrigation. See Exhibit 3.18. 3.5.8 Open Space and Edge Conditions The goal of the Travertine community is to blend into the natural desert surroundings. The edge/transitional landscape treatment will be an integral part of this goal. The landscape that surrounds the community is native untouched desert, and then a band of transitional landscape planting will occur that will have native plant reseeding and native tree planting. This edge/transitional planting area will vary in width according to location and ease the look into the community planting which will have a higher density of desert planting. See Exhibit 3.19. 3-231Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 734 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.17 — Parcel Landscape Open Space [ � . `.. •�:�_ ..ern . � a L � .. ,.; xd�. -r t s • �i �, i l I - ��."kr�:�'�^x �.yal�. C� 4 41 J- W ..l COMMUNITY SHADE STRUCTURE _EGEND MPercalLand6capa Open Space 3-241Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 735 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.18 — Community Slope Landscape 3-251Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 736 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.19 - Open Space and Edge Conditions oil 1 � I � . I —ow — �~ LEGEND NafuralLan dscape Trans:rL 3-261Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 737 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.5.9 On -Street, Off -Street and Strolling Trails All trails in Travertine will have planting adjacent to them. Depending on the location and type, the planting will vary in density and use of color desert shrubs and accents. Trails will have shade areas provided by groves of trees and in some place's structures also. The strolling trail through the middle of the community will be the most intensely planted and also have an adjacent open space lawn that lines one area. Public and private trails are located throughout the community. The proposed system of trails and paths throughout the Specific Plan area forms a centerpiece of the park and recreation plan. The trail system provides a link for walkers, joggers and cyclists, connecting neighborhoods, parks and open spaces. See Exhibits 3.20, 3.21 and 3.22. 3.5.10 Public Hiking Trails Public hiking trails surround the perimeter of Travertine and can be accessed from the staging areas located on the south side of Jefferson Street near Avenue 62. These trails are routed along some of the most scenic locations in the area and connect to the existing public hiking trail system at the Boo Hoff Trail. See Exhibit 3.23. 3-27 1 P a g e TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 738 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.20 — On Street Trails LEGEND _ Trails - On Street 3-28 1 P a g e TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 739 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.21 — Off Street Trails L.00P TRAIT_ COMPACTEDAND ICR NAIVE 5FMWI ON IN Ir GRAND LOOP TRAR_SEGTEOM NAFWE=k TRAl34fi0liili �Hr<viA,Mvlc IH" C[MWACIEDD-O. 1�1 IINT€RCONNECTOR TRAIL LEGEND '—^'1 Comrnurlity Grand LaopTraiI ----N Interconnector Trail Trailhead A-514OW NG IRML �-- ovWHew --- SEATWAU — FLAMER — NATN $TOM WALLS WATER FOIIWAIN Iowa_ IhTERCONNECTOR TRAII.. SiROL W MAIL OR SIDE—Lr CWERHEAn SEAWALL COLLM* s 3-29IPage TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 740 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.22 — Strolling Trail :a. STROLLING TRAIL PEDESTRIAN SHADE o —1 ee r` ffv �• I `J al LE END I Trails - ❑n Street 3-301Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 741 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.5.11 Community West and East Parks Community parks are located at each end of the spine trail and will provide turf in limited areas for recreation and play. Shade trees, benches and picnic areas, tot lots and dog parks will make these passive parks an enjoyable space for the residents to meet. The community parks will supplement the pocket parks located within the individual residential developments, see Exhibits 3.23 and 3.24. A community clubhouse is proposed for the community park north of Jefferson Street. Cross-section 3, Exhibit 3.33, shows the natural condition along the projects' western boundary to the development. The multi -use trail runs along the western boundary and separates the natural environment from the project's graded slopes. Slopes along this edge are generally graded at a 2:1 ratio; along with the outer edge, they will also be reinforced for flood protection. Cross-section 11, Exhibit 3.37, is located on Jefferson Street between the two -project roundabouts. Again, the slope gradients are softened to a 5:1 ratio to provide large setbacks to residential uses. Cross -sections 12 and 13, Exhibit 3.37, show the spine trail that connects both community parks. This trail will be 10 feet wide and will accommodate pedestrians and cyclists to provide off-street access to the community amenities, the loop road system and the generous setbacks to residential development. Slope gradients on either side of the street are at a 5:1 ratio to allow for landscape and distance to separate homes from the street. 3-311Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 742 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.23 — Community West Park V I S N V k i� Community West Park Approximate 4.7 Acres tRfliwis9L! z% 3-321Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 743 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.24 — Community East Park IiR VQ UWW TRAIL- %IAOESHELTER LL'FJfr LALVfi � r,Aanerr�r.uRHnrrsF Community East Park Approximate 8.8 Acres RTs SrGX FACE EVENT LAWN S 9HAbE9LKvC [19E :s rs S i s r1: RN:SRrn tin . II'. I I,Rl lJ.k 7LS1'RI:CLURL L� 1/ SFRvh-F. S `•\S 'S1ARJ ENTRY k' s EC'Eh71AW-N 171S l U'TS • .y i r' myr.EATI1REiStlADE5l RVLLUILL i' I : . - , LIiWEr1 L:t1Atl1tvll}'l:l:�{1FIi 1]IM1 INC L.7+YN a f]L EVENr r.M;N ' L��Lti }� • I ' _ � I _--------r r LEGEND _ Parks I I I I I - I I 3-331Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 744 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.5.12 Resort and Spa The North resort area of the community will have an oasis -type landscape concept. Areas of intensive use will have a lush green landscape design. These areas would be pool areas, dining, recreational areas, and resort guest garden areas. Also, the villa area pool, recreational, and guest garden areas would be designed with this oasis type of landscape design. A lush desert landscape would link these oasis areas of the resort and the villas and other vital areas of the resort. In addition, a native low water use landscape design would be used in the less visited and outer areas of the resort. It would be used on guest access trails to the undisturbed desert areas to experience the native desert. See Exhibit 3.25 and 3.26. Exhibit 3.25 — Resort and Spa Landscape Illustrative CORAL " MOUNTAIN sf� 1. 7 I i WORTH FNTRY RESORT ROOMS MAINa C—P.ID21 RUSORT MAIM COMPIE X — SPA X VELLNESS CF7` TER 3-341Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 745 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.26 — Resort and Spa Landscape Concepts 3-351Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 746 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.5.13 Golf Academy / Practice Facility The south golf academy area will be a low water use native desert landscape design overall. Low water - use plants will be used extensively in sites not devoted to turf for the golf academy functions. Ancillary areas of the facility will have a mini oasis look with limited use of turf for social functions and formal desert low water use gardens for guests to explore surrounding the banquet venue. See Exhibit 3.27. Exhibit 3.27 — Golf Training Facility Landscape Concept 115, N"K, .-F. %In N. L E E 2 TRAIL STAGING AREA IJRTVTATCr RANGE :ET FACM'IY AND ` LDDI\G C: RDEN .CAOF.N1Y 3-361Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 747 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.5.14 Typical Fences and Walls For purposes of this section, "fence" or "wall" means any type of fence, wall, retaining wall, sound attenuation wall, screen or windscreen. The terms "fence" and "wall" are used interchangeably in this section to mean any or all of the preceding structures. All fencing and wall use are subject to the City of La Quinta municipal 9.60.030 Fences and walls and should reflect the materials and design of the approved home facade. The treatment of the wall should match the architectural treatment of the residential building, or the walls and/or fences that are an integral part of the garden design. Location of fences and walls and examples of materials that may be used for fences and walls are found in Exhibit 3.28 and 3.29. Low freestanding courtyard walls, gateposts and entry monuments under six (6) feet high may be integrated into the driveway or auto court -design. Walls, fences, terraces and outdoor landscape areas should appear to be extensions of indoor areas and the building architecture, rather than as independent elements. Walls shall be architecturally compatible with the house and built of similar materials and colors "Drive through" archways or beams may be permitted on a case -by -case basis with the approval of the City. The design concept, therefore, is to make fences and walls blend with both the architecture and the landscape, while still providing privacy and security consistent with the needs of individual lot owners. Fences and walls placed on lots shall be an extension of the colors and materials of the adjacent residential architecture, visually compatible and be of materials related to the land (such as stone). They may occur as an extension of house living spaces, to frame courtyards or to direct views. Wrought iron fencing styles and downslope fencing techniques are encouraged to maintain views. The following requirements apply to all fences and walls within the Travertine Community: 1. Walls and fences should be kept as low as possible while performing their intended function. Wall height should be minimized to avoid a "fortress" appearance. The design of fences and walls, as well as the materials used, should be consistent with the overall housedesign. 2. Appropriate materials for walls and fencing include tube steel, river rock stone veneer, glass, split face block and slumpstone block. 3. Fence and wall colors should match or complement the color of the building. 4. Tops of retaining walls should blend with natural contours. Ends of walls should not end abruptly, but are to transition into existing landforms, rock outcroppings and vegetation. 5. Plant materials are encouraged to be woven in and around fences to help fences merge with the landscape. 6. Adjacent to a Nonresidential Zone or Uses, the maximum fence height between a residential zone or use and a nonresidential zone or use shall be eight feet. Prohibited fence materials include the use of barbed wire, razor wire, chain link, or similar materials. Chain link fencing is permitted for temporary construction fences when authorized by a minor use permit issued in accordance with Section 9.210.025. Said minor use permit shall not be approved until a permit for grading, or construction, has been filed for, whichever comes first. 3-371Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 748 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.28 — Conceptual Wall Type Schedule —;W - I r I. EGEND Wildlife Fence S' View Fence I Combination Fence and Wall Community Standard Wall 3-381Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 749 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.29 - Overall Wall Plan s• HEGM vERflC•+L RAILS S" ON C:vTER Co MmUNITY WILOLIFEFENGE — L;MU SPLIT iAGE SLOCK WJ SMOOTH FACE 3.DCK DETA;L EV ERY 2X' O.a,PAIMED 1 i S' HEIGHT TYPICAL J I �I I WANUAKU -'AI (-LL mg IMLILK WALL P."5RTY UNE WALL — REAR YARD POOL BARRIER STANDARD FENCE T HIEMUHT BLOCK WAU , eddL tOo=°wCE NEGµF-y 5 COMMUN T' STANDARD VIEW FENCE C.O. NIT7 SIANDARD SAND FINISH VLP=n WALL TRAVERTINE STONE INSET r- UsEU PA'I YA AdCi r Ut U PAS `A 4i3ET W ?I TILE AND C-,AZ!HSER r 2'K3' COLUMN yy COMM:.NITY STANOAM SAND'AIIsK STUCCo WALLS 1 k I FNHANC:FF)'JVAII FIFVATI')N ENHANCET) WAII END COLUMN 3-391Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 750 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.5.15 Landscape Cross -Sections The following cross -sections depict the relationship between the slope areas and the buildable areas of the project. The majority of the cross -sections show the Native Seed Planting areas of slopes. These areas would be fine graded to match the existing desert and have boulder outcroppings. In addition, only native desert trees planted with a density to match the current desert and a native non -irrigated desert seed mix would be installed in these slope areas. Other cross -sections have the treatments stated above and the Transitional Desert Planting that would line the pedestrian trails. These areas will have more native plants and shrubs and would be on an irrigation system. Tree placement in all cross -sections would be driven by matching tree density of the surrounding desert areas, views from home lots, and blending into adjacent areas more extensively planted, such as the Transitional Zone. 1. Landscape Cross -Sections Key Map — Interior, Exhibit 3.30 2. Landscape Cross -Sections Key Map — Exterior, Exhibit 3.31 3. Landscape Cross -Section 1 and 2, Exhibit 3.32 4. Landscape Cross -Sections 3 and 4, Exhibit 3.33 5. Landscape Cross -Sections 5, Exhibit 3.34 6. Landscape Cross -Sections 6, Exhibit 3.35 7. Landscape Cross -Sections 7, 8, and 9, Exhibit 3.36 8. Landscape Cross -Sections 10, 11, 12, and 13, Exhibit 3.37 3-401Paac TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 751 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.30 — Landscape Cross -Sections Key Map — Interior LEGEND 0 Section Lines F •r'j, ... MCILFT7. . I'RM I Ii i I 3-411Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 752 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.31 — Landscape Cross -Sections Key Map — Exterior lu r. j 1 LEGEND 0 Section Lines 3-421Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 753 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.32 — Landscape Cross -Section 1 and 2 PL - - - - - - � Existing - '_Natural Slopc Jefferson Slope Villas Street SECTION 1 12' Trail L Existing Slope Road Villas EEv, Slope Utility 150' Resort Road Roa SECTION I CONT'D PL I DL Slope Villas Slope Villas Coral Mountain ' rl J1 J, rl JI J1 Natural Slope Slope N.AT Jefferson Street SECTION 2 Flee. 214' Elev- 230' 3-431Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 754 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.33 — Landscape Cross -Sections 3 and 4 12 Natural Slope Road I Slope l DR LDR Elev. SECTION 3 �37' xesrrr3or - --- -- Elev. 425' SECTION 4 ;NUM, au oiupr Keservior aWpt: 1142KUT'd1 Elev.335' MSE Wall SECTION 4 - CONrD 3-441Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 755 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.34 — Landscape Cross -Section 5 Slope SECTION 5 Natural Martinez Rack SECTION 5 CONT'D Slide 3-451Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 756 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.35 — Landscape Cross -Section 6 jeffemn LDR U)R Street Fler.119, Elev. LID' Elev,115' Road Nev. — Slope — Slope 118' SECTION 6 LDR I LDR Elev_ 120' Elev.120' Road Elea. Slope 119' SECTION 6 CON-rD Existing Fairway Elev, 117' L Water Slope Feature 12' Trail LIA Natural Elev. 129' RoadElev. Slope 127' 3-461Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 757 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.36 - Landscape Cross -Section 7, 8, and 9 4' Retaining — Wa]l Basin Entry Elcv.25' Landscape' Open Space Jefferson Strect — Elev. 50' SECTION 7 SECTION 8 12' PL ?rail DL Existing MDR Flev. 62' slope 2' Retaining Wall • Existing Public Driving Range Facility Elev. 42' - — Entry Landscape/ Open Space R.ecreatiun Center Elev- 83 SECTION 9 Natural DL 12' J Trail. Slope Natural PL Basin Elev, 33' 3-471Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 758 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.37 — Landscape Cross -Sections 10,11,12, and 13 12' PL TrailI3L Resort Elev. 100' ' Re xwt Secondary Entry SECTION 10 C%-WD Rcchargc Basin Naturai LDR slope 1 Slopt MDR L MDR Heir,- 147' Jefferson Street Elm 52Road Elev.135' SECTION 11 LDR mupc Elev. 140' SECTION 12 SECTION 13 8' 8' Trail Trail LDR Elev.145' MDR Pasco MDR Elm 98' Nev. 98 3-48 1 P a g e TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 759 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES 3.6 Planting Zones The project has three planting area types. These are Native Seed Revegetation, Transitional Desert Planting, and Enhanced Desert Planting. See Exhibit 3.38. The Native Seed Planting Area is the area that links the undisturbed desert areas surrounding the project to the disturbed interior of the project. These areas are the slopes and places that will have significant restoration grading. The grading will return the sites to a more natural native desert with boulder massing and grading, raking, and water settling. After the water settles and final fine grading is completed, a native seed mix of desert plants native to the surrounding area will be applied. Native trees will be planted in patterns and density to match the surrounding desert. Only the trees will be on irrigation. The Transitional Desert Planting areas will stitch the Native Seed Planting Areas and the Enhanced Desert Planting together. These areas will be associated with lining paths, the main roads, trails and used as a buffer to the Enhanced Desert Planting. Desert low water use shrubs, trees, and groundcovers will give shade, color, and interest to these areas where people walk and hike. The plant density for these areas will be 50% less than the Enhanced Desert Planting's areas. The Enhanced Desert Planting Area will have double the planting density of the Transitional Desert Planting. All plants will be low -water -use desert plants but will be augmented with more lush moderate water use plants still associated with the landscapes found in desert planting designs. Some will have small lawn areas. The areas related to this planting design are the public areas where people will congregate, the trail ends, community center areas, traffic circles, all entry features, some selected areas of the North resort area, and the South Golf facility. 3.7 Plant Material Guidelines It is the intent of these guidelines to provide flexibility and diversity in plant material selection, while maintaining a limited palette in order to give greater unity and thematic identity to the community. The landscape areas within Travertine focus on the use of plant materials characteristic of Coachella Valley materials and colors. It is important to make a strong connection with the natural open space surrounding the community, while also providing a pleasing landscape for common areas within the streetscapes and off-street trail areas. The informal landscape theme of the spine trail will include benches, and areas to relax and enjoy the views of the surrounding mountains and valleys. Native and non-native trees will provide shaded areas and shrubs and grasses will add color and texture. See Table 10 for a list of prohibited invasive ornamental plants. The Travertine landscape plan will be limited to the plant palette contained in Table 10 which is in compliance with CVWD requirements for low-water landscaping and reflects the desert environment of the surrounding areas. The goal of the landscape plan is to achieve water conservation through the design of the plan and use of native materials. The limited selection of materials used in simple, significant composition, complementary to adjacent common landscape area and reinforcing the individual architectural and site setting is encouraged. Overall plant material selection for given project areas shall have compatible, drought resistant characteristics. Irrigation programming can then be designed to minimize water application for the entire landscape setting and will require smart landscaping systems. Sustainability is a major consideration of the City of La Quinta and the region as a whole. When possible, rapidly renewable materials will be considered and used in the construction of the buildings in Travertine. It also will be important to consider the construction waste generated from the site and prevent raw materials from entering the landfills by minimizing waste and utilizing recycling programs. 3-49 1 P a g c TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 760 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Exhibit 3.38 - Planting Zones hLJ-1 R2_',hu E 1:i 11 - � �' .C. - -- � i :lt-vNtiF �'[1t;d1. l'I:S I.IZ[ F' �.'•:7 iVL s `�+,_�' •- ENh,�SCiDPESERTPLANIJNc, LEGEND Hative Seed Revegelalion ] TransitionalDesedPlantiag Enhanced Desert Planting 3-501Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 761 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Table 10: Landscape Palette Test type Botanical Name Common Name Trees Acacia sp. Acacia Bauhinia sp. Bauhinia Cercocarpus sp. Cercocarpus Chilopsis sp. Chilopsis Chitalpa sp. Chitalpa Citrus sp. Citrus Dalea so. Dalea Ebenopsis Ebenopsis Fraxinus so. Fraxinus Laqerstroemia so. Lagerstroemia Lvsiloma so. Lvsiloma Olneva sp. Olneva Parkinsonia sp. Parkinsonia Prosopis sp. Prosopis Pistacia sp. Pistacia Quercus sp. Quercus Rhus sp. Rhus Schinus sp. Schinus Sophora so. Sophora Thevetia so. Thevetia Tipuana so. Tipuana Vitex so. Vitex Palms Bismarkia so. Bismarkia Butia so. Butia Palm Brahea asp. Brahea Palm Chamaerops so. Chamaerops Palms Cvcas so. Cvcas Phoenix so. Phoenix Palm Washinqtonia so. Washingtonia Palm Shrubs Abutilon so. Abutilon Alvogne so. Alvogne Anisacanthus so. AnisacanthusAnt Bouqainvillea so. Bougainvillea Baileva so. Bailvea Buddleia so. Buddleia Calliandra so. Calliandra Callistemon so. Callistemon Carrissa so. Carissa Carvopteris so. Carvopteris Cordia so. Cordia Dalea so. Dalea 3-511Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 762 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Dodonea so. Dodonaea Encelia so. Encelia Eremophila so. Eremophila Ericameria so. Ericameria Erioqonum sp. Eriogonum Euphorbia sp. Euphorbia Hamelia sp. Hamelia Justicia sp. Justicia Lantana sp. Lantana Larrea sp. Larrea Leucaena sp. Leucaena Leucophvllum so. Leucophvllum Rosemarinus so. Rosemary Ruellia so. Ruellia Russelia so. Russelia Salvia so. Sage Senna so. Cassia Simmondsia so. Simmondsia Taqetes so. Tagetes Tecoma so. Tecoma Verbena so. Verbena Wedelia so. Wedelia Espaliers and Vines Bouqainvillea so. Bougainvillea Antiqonon so. Antigonon Calliandra so. Calliandra Gelsemium so. Gelsemium Pvracantha so. Prvracantha Trachelopsermum so. Trachelospermum Desert Accents Aqave so. Agave Aloe so. Aloe Atriplex so. Atri Alex Bailey so. Bailvea Bulbine so. Bulbine CalvIophus so. Calvlophus Caesalpina so. Caesalpinia Cereus so. Cerus Dasvlirion so. Dasvlirion Dracenea draco Dragon Tree Echinocactus so. Echinocactus Euphorbia so. Euphorbia Fouquieria so. Fouqueiria Hesperaloe so. Hesperaloe Manqave so. Mangave Nolina so. Nolina Opuntia sp. Opuntia 3-521Panc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 763 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Pachvicereus so. Pachvicereus Pedilanthus so. Pedilanthus Penstemon so. Penstemon Yucca so. Yucca Groundcover Acacia so. Acacia Acalvpha so. Acalvpha Ambrosia so. Ambrosia Conoclinium so. Conoclinium Convolvulus so. Convolvulus Dalea so. Dalea Gazania so. Gazania Guara so. Guara Glandularia so. Glandularia Malephora so. Malephora Oenothera so. Oenothera Portulacaria so. Portulacaria Psilostrophe so. Psilostrophe Rosmarinus so. Rosemary Ruellia so. Ruellia Senecio so. Senicio Verbena so. Verbena Grasses Muhlenberqia so. Muhlenbergia 3-531Panc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 764 3.0 DESIGN GUIDELINES Table 11: Prohibited Invasive Ornamental Plants Botanical Name Arundo donax Atriplex semibaccata Avena barbata Avena fatua Brassica tournefortii2 Bromus madritensis ssp. rubensl Bromus tectorum2 Cortaderia iubata [syn.C. atacamensis] Cortaderia dioica [syn. C. selloanai Descurainia sophia Eichhornia crassipes Elaegnus anqustifolia Foeniculum vulqare Hirschfeldia incana Lepidium latifolium Lolium multiflorum Nerium oleander Nicotiana qlaucal Parkinsonia aculeatal Pennisetum clandestinum Pennisetum setaceum2 Pin us sp. Ricinus communis Salsola traqus Schinus molle Schismus arabicus Schismus barbatus Stipa capensis Tamarix spp. (all species) Taeniatherum caput-medusae Tribulus terrestris Washinqtonia robusta Common Name giant reed Australian saltbush slender wild oat wild oat African or Saharan mustard red brome cheat grass Jubata grass or Andean pampas grass pampas grass tansy mustard water hyacinth Russian olive sweet fennel short -pod mustard perennial pepperweed Italian ryegrass oleander tree tobacco Mexican palo verde Kikuyu grass fountain grass Pine castorbean Russian thistle Peruvian pepper tree Mediterranean grass Saharan grass no common name tamarisk or salt cedar Medusa -head puncturevine Mexican fan palm 3-54 1 P a g e TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 765 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 4 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN This Section describes the infrastructure development plan, requirements and implementation as well as the general intent and comprehensive framework of the infrastructure development within the Travertine development. 4.1 Circulation Plan Description Exhibit 4.1 illustrates the conceptual Circulation system proposed to serve the Travertine community. The community at buildout will be served by two access points: (1) the southerly extension of Jefferson Street as a Modified Secondary Arterial, south of Avenue 58, and (2) the westerly extension of Avenue 62 as a Modified Secondary Arterial west of Monroe Street. An emergency vehicle access road (EVA) will provide a secondary point of access for emergency use only, during the first phase of builder construction, or up to the first 600 units. The EVA will extend from the southerly termination of Madison Street to the interior of the project to provide emergency access prior to the full extension of Jefferson and Avenue 62. The required timing for the opening of the EVA will be established by conditions of approval on subdivision maps as a function of the pace, intensity and location of development within the Specific Plan. During the Grading Phase A stage (discussed more fully in Section 4.4 Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan, herein), Avenue 62 will cross Dike No.4 and extend westerly towards the Travertine project boundary. This crossing will require a license, secured by the City of La Quinta, and approved by the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) and approval from the County of Riverside. This spine roadway, which curves through the project, is shown on Exhibit 4.1. Jefferson Street will be extended south of Avenue 58 through the Coral Canyon development, a portion of Bureau of Land Management (BLM) land and continue through Travertine to meet the extension of Avenue 62. As illustrated in Exhibit 4.1, The Jefferson Street/ Avenue 62 spine road will be a modified secondary arterial road configuration between the northern project boundary (as the southerly extension of Jefferson) and the eastern project boundary (as the westerly extension of Avenue 62). Avenue 62 will be improved as a Modified Secondary Arterial east of the project to Monroe Street. The Travertine community land uses are oriented on both sides of the Jefferson Street / Avenue 62 spine roadway, with local loop collector roads emanating from the spine roadway via round-abouts to provide access to the neighborhoods as illustrated on Exhibit 4.1. Loop collector roads will have a typical right- of-way of 70 feet, with curb -to -curb distances of 40 feet with 9-foot curb adjacent landscaped parkways and a 6-foot-wide pedestrian walkway on both sides. Exhibits 4.2 and 4.3 identify the typical street cross sections and standards. A detail of the round -about is shown in Exhibit 4.4. Local roads are also planned to be utilized and will be comprised of a curb -to -curb dimension of 32 feet for single loaded streets, which allows for parking on one side of the street and 41 feet, for double loaded streets which allows for parking on both sides of the street. These residential local roads will provide a landscape easement at a minimum of 12 feet on each side of the street and 15 feet to residential building. An access road will be dedicated for entry to Section 5 for any future uses. The road will connect from the loop road of the Travertine project to Section 5, that will be defined as an easement and entitled by the Applicant to allow access from the project, during the same Construction Phase as the loop road is built. 4-11Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 766 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN The project neighborhoods will be gated for privacy. These gates will be located at the intersections of the loop roads and Jefferson Street or Avenue 62. Exhibit 4.5 shows the location of the gates off the spine roadway and the typical gate configuration is shown on Exhibit 4.6. The Resort / Spa entry at Jefferson will also be gated. Gating of individual neighborhoods within the residential Planning Areas is permitted. The location of any proposed gates will be reviewed and approved by the city as part of either a tentative tract map application or as a part of a site plan review application. Exhibit 4.6 exhibits the typical landscape of the entries to the development from both Avenue 62 and Jefferson Street as well as typical entry gates for the residential portions of the development off of the spine road and on the loop road entries of the project. The ultimate drainage plans for Specific Plan area's conveyance and retention/detention onsite will determine the placement and extent of bridges and/or culvert crossings needed to maintain all-weather access for all roadways. The Construction Phase 1 stage (see Section 5.6 of this Specific Plan) will include facilities of approximately 14.1-acres that will be located both north and south of the prolongation of Avenue 62 and will outlet water into the impound area against Dike No. 4. 4-21Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 767 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Exhibit 4.1 — Circulation Plan —AVENUE 5B ? Dike P �4PAL + f CANYON •'! _::; Maiinnin 1 Dike a r i REFT —76 R --"•^ —._, �� � � EVA [PFiAS£J ONLY} •l-_- NAP E -- LCOPS-rater rc i 4i pp i AvENUF s2 Aw - -------�z1 y Rock Slidc LEGEND JeHems Sheet 1 Avenue 62 ® Roundeboul lr 1 Emergerroy Vehicular Access Loop Collector ® Gates ® Local Roads ® Access Road 4-31Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 768 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Exhibit 4.2 — Roadway Sections A, B, & C RM L aa' 15' 27' 27' 15' Varies 2:1-5:1 6' L & 6 a' L 12' r y r 12' a' 3' 6' varies 2:1-5:1 a scope vane Min. T sad Min. Va' a�scape Buffer Lane Median Lane Buffer Class it Bike Lana LPerkway Parkway Meandering Sidewalk Section A - JEFFERSON STREET & AVE 62 84' Modified Secondary Arterial R1W R1W 79 15' 20' 20' 15' 3:1 MAX. 6' 9' 8' 12' 12' 8' 9' 6' 3.1 MAX. Landscape Walk Travel Travel Walk Landscape Buffer Parkway Class II Lane Lane Class II Parkway Buffer Bike Bike Lane Lane Section B - LOOP COLLECTOR County of Riverside City of Le Quints S'LY RM II S0, N'LY RJW 30' �Fencal J3� Fence Retaining Well Retaining Wall H. Va'10a 4' t035's II H. Varies 4'te 35'x 10 8' 12' 6' , 12' 6'4I, Bike Travel Travel Bike Lane Len. Median' Lane Lana) Sidewalk 46 Curb to Curb Striped Median (0-600 Units) Rained Median (601- Unite) Section C - BRIDGE SECTION 4-41Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 769 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Exhibit 4.3 — Roadway Sections D, E, & F RIW 60' RIW 10' 20' 20' 10- 2' 2- LL LEEI 3:1 MAX. 5' 5' 8' 12- 12' 8' �5' �5- 3:1 MAX. Landscape Travel Travel Landscape Buffer WalParking Lane Lane Parki Balk Buffer Section D - LOCAL ROAD RIW 40' RfW1. 1. 5 5' Utility Utility Easement I I Easement L J 8' �, 12' 12' 8'; RM 21 RAW 10.5' 10.5' Travel Lanes Section F - TANK ROAD Parking Travel Lanes Parking Section E - LOCAL ROAD R/W 30, R/W I` I [3'[ 12' 12' L3'[ Shoulder Travel Shoulder Lanes Section G - MADISON EVA 4-51Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 770 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Exhibit 4.4 — Roundabout STREET CURB MASS PLANTING a STONE INSET BAND RAISED PLANTER ` COMMUNITYTOWERELE^RENT $TONE WALL i. RW RIw 2S' 29 ------------ I I E 6 Parkway 8' 12' 45' A 1 " 8' Pa[kwa g' (Valrgg) Travel Trawl {Vafresj Raced LanC.. If Bike Law Median Glass II Bike Lorre Lane Meandaring Sldewalk pr Moandering Sidewalk or MuIG-Purpose Trail Multi -Purpose Trail I i I I t I, r 4-61Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 771 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Exhibit 4.5 — Street Gated Entry Section & Details RM R/W 125' , l 1 le CE 15' I � � I I I I j I I j I 6' L 10' L 24' 26' 14' 14' 14' 7 4' 6' Parkway Travel Gate Trave4 Median Travel Parkway Lane House Lane Lane Meandering Sidewalk or Meandering Sidewalk or—] Multi -Purpose Trail Multi -Purpose Trail ENTRY I EXIT GATE COMr/r NiTT TOWER ELEMENT NATIVE STONE COMMUNITY WALL $TANDMa � I l � l r. 26' 73 I r_2 — 14' 125' r 4-71Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 772 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Exhibit 4.6 — Typical Gated Entries 4-81Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 773 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 4.2 Water Coachella Valley Water District (CV W D) has jurisdiction over domestic water service to the Travertine project. Currently, domestic water service lines exist in the area of the intersection of Avenue 60 and from the Jefferson Street extension and Avenue 62. During the Construction Phase 1 stage (see Section 5.6 Conceptual Grading and Construction Phasing Plan), water utilities will be connected prior to any home building. One well will be constructed during the Grading Phase A stage, located off the Travertine project site. Currently there are ongoing discussions with local parcel owners, CVWD and developers, to locate the future offsite well sites. The well sites necessary to serve the project have been analyzed by CVWD. The initial number of well sites based on the criteria outlined in CVWD's Development Design Manual (Aug. 2018 version) section 5.6.1 for this project is equivalent to up five well sites at maximum. The final number of well sites that will actually be needed to serve the site will be determined from a development agreement between CVWD and the developer based on extenuating circumstances for providing alternative means and measures of water service to not only the project but to the region. The process for acquisition of well sites will be done by a private purchase by the developer, where the environmental clearance coincident with the project will be generic for all typical well sites located within CVWD's jurisdiction. Those site - specific well sites will be purchased by the developer and ultimately dedicated to CVWD. Exhibit 4.7 identifies the conceptual on -site water service facilities that are required to provide domestic water to the community. As noted above, wells are required to be improved and/or constructed to serve the project site, with one well operable and available prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Use and Occupancy. Additional facilities will include two water reservoirs and booster stations to collect the well water and store it at elevation to provide the required water pressure for the site. The project site will be served with a thirty -inch main line within Jefferson Street/Madison Street alignments. Twelve -inch and smaller lines will then feed off the main line to serve the individual developments along these public streets. Precise locations, alignments, and sizes of water service facilities will be determined at the Tentative and Final Map stage of development, per City and CVWD regulations and standards. Irrigation water for landscaping and any golf uses is intended to be non -potable Coachella Canal water that is available to the site. Infrastructure will be installed in Grading Phase A stage to convey the water to the site and to ensure that the non -potable water remains separate from the potable water system. In the event that this water is not available to the Travertine development, the onsite irrigation wells will be utilized for future irrigation. In the Phase A Grading stage (see Section 5.6 Conceptual Grading and Construction Phasing Plan), prior to any building construction, the project must have the necessary fire flows to all hydrants in addition to providing two points of access. The project will provide all wet and dry utilities from Avenue 62 to the point of connection for various builder phases. The project will have to adequately secure all common area landscape prior to construction. See Exhibit 4.7 4-91Pagc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 774 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Exhibit 4.7 — Conceptual Water Plan v PROPOSED JEFFERSOfV STREET r - 1'..;.6 1. _. `�• `� - ' NAP LOOP STREET EAST I ? 'r BWSTER 02 � i LOOP STREET.: WEST ' AVEIVlJC 82 ^SE6AVE,�fN$ERT E $>> I -12 I q 12 ZONEA25 ZONE 335 7:7 Yiartinc�.Fay k St;dz AVE B2 INSERT 80097ER 0+-51 AVENUE 62 V RESERIOR -— RESERVIO t 2.65 MG LEGLNU •..••• designate Zode Separatlon F-Ej Proposed Reseruairs © In oome23ic Water Main m P=Md Booster PumO © 425 Domestic Water Meln 4-101Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 775 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 4.3 Sewer The project site is presently served by the CVWD. Plans to extend the sewer mains along Avenue 62 and Jefferson Street to the project are in development. The conceptual on -site sewer facilities and improvements are shown on Exhibit 4.8. The facilities are comprised of a series of eight -inch sewer lines serving the individual developments and flowing into the main sewer line located within the Jefferson Street/spine road alignment. The main sewer line increases in size as it proceeds eastward, ranging in size from eight inches on the west side to 15 inches at Madison Street, where the line exits the project site. Final design criteria, location, alignment and sizing of sewer facilities will be determined at the tentative and final map stage of development, pursuant to the processes and specifications of the City and CVWD. 4-111Pagc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 776 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Exhibit 4.8 — Conceptual Sewer Plan Dike - - - RVETVC7E98 n Coral r Mom tain Dike Q ' - .. .. .STREET NAP j T is I $ ~ EAST ,o LOOP STREET I $ I AVE ti' 1 �•, � y 7 ' Maitincc r i Rock Slide 1 LEGEND 0 Sewer Lines 4-121Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 777 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 4.4 Conceptual Grading and Drainage Plan The project site slopes gently in a downslope direction from west to east and is subject to two kinds of drainage conditions: alluvial fan flow and incised drainage corridors along inactive fans. The primary existing drainage condition is alluvial fan flow; eight canyon drainages contribute runoff to the overall project site. The major contributors of runoff to the planned development area are Devil Canyon, Middle North Canyon, Middle South Canyon, and Rock Avalanche Canyon. Flows from these canyons and other drainages continue across the site and ultimately drain into the reservoir created by Dike No. 4. Exhibit 4.9 illustrates the conceptual grading of the plan and outlines the areas of cut and fill. Exhibit 4.10 demonstrates the proposed gradient of the slopes within the project. 4-131Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 778 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Exhibit 4.9 — Conceptual Balance Grading Plan Cut Area FIII Area ❑Ike JF STREET ;FLY . '. ! i''. i, LJr- I I Coral ARi!uillEllll �"'•YI _. DMa34L — — AVENUE (10 r F— ❑RL]PUSED JEFFERSDN ,• ^� J ��-._ STREET r EAST AVENUE $2 '7ffr-- `r Martuiei '� _ f ,� Rack 51idc 4-141Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 779 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Exhibit 4.10 — Slope Ratio Diagram AVENUE58 ffff ' t� _r_� �'. � } `' r��l 1'i�' S �, ''1/�.•�-- f 1. r JJ -ORAL �—.. GANYQN.�;l' _ - re n Coral g MOLIIIIain Dkr. d E �'iOrL.S�J �EEFEEtSDN_" I� �;1 r7 1 j ` -7- - - LGGPSMEET f j Easr -1� �i L_ 1. �'• Mal- inea i.� Rock Slide LEGERD Slope 5:1 Skope 3:1 Slope 2:1 4-151Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 780 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 4.4.1 Drainage Plan The approach to the management of drainage in the Specific Plan is to concentrate the planned development within the inactive fan areas where possible and provide a perimeter flood protection system around the development site to provide the necessary level of protection. The primary watershed solution (Exhibit 4.11 and 4.12) illustrates flows being conveyed around the site in order to pass flows to the downstream off -site areas along Dike No. 4 in a manner that avoids flooding risks to the downstream areas. Project implementation will require management of active alluvial fan flow conditions on the western and southern edges of the planned development area. Alluvial fan flows potentially impact the entire western and southern edges of the planned development area. To manage this condition, it is determined that a perimeter flood protection barrier will be used along the western and southern boundaries. The barrier will consist of a raised edge condition with a slope lining to protect against scour and erosion. The edge will be elevated above the water surface elevations associated with the 100-year storm event and will be designed based on a worst -case flow scenario assuming an active alluvial flow condition. These flood protection barriers solve four problems: they will intercept alluvial fan flows, incised canyon flows, and will control associated debris load; and they will allow planned conveyance facilities around the project. The proposed conveyance features will direct off -site flows, once intercepted by the barriers, around the perimeter of the development by means of open channel swales to safe outlets on the north and south sides of the development. The site itself will be raised along these edge barriers to avoid the creation of levee like conditions. The offsite run-off from Devil Canyon will be distributed in the north through the existing Guadalupe Dike system to Dike No. 4. Offsite watershed runoff from the Middle Canyons (North and South) and Rock Avalanche Canyon will be intercepted and conveyed along the southern portion of the site to Dike No. 4 south of the proposed Avenue 62 crossing. As seen under the primary drainage solution; Exhibit 4.11, flows will be conveyed around the site on the west and south boundaries and re -distributed on the east along Dike No. 4. The Conceptual Hydrology plan for the Travertine development ensures that all residents of the community, as well as downstream facilities and properties, will be protected from periodic flooding that is experienced in the region. Exhibit 4.11 also identifies the existing flows that come on to the project site, generally from the south and west. The diagrams also identify the various conceptual storm facilities (perimeter barriers, on -site drainage) that are required to transmit storm runoff flows. More detailed engineering and design, consistent with design standards established by the City and the CVWD, will be completed at the final map stages of development, resulting in the precise location, alignment, and sizing of all drainage facilities. 4-161Pagc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 781 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN Exhibit 4.11— Conceptual Hydrology Plan I � I AROFOSEO JEFFERSON STRUT _ _ Cr»:rl GUADALUPE CREEK N a� Mountain DIVERSION DIKESEAsT ' iVAF AVEAVE BO , L 1 r� �1 I !mod' Dihe 4 j OUTLET PIPES FROM BASING { LOOP STREET-- � r f m •• -1 - ' • l � i I � LrS 1 Mal-liRel - ,•` iJ I �y' __ _r �-,• �. Ruck Slid. LEGEND Existing Major Watershed Pan meter Flood Ramer 0 High Paint Existing Sheet Flovi 0 On -site Orainege Warersha d ➢nrerslo n Vdq hiP Bavn l 4-171Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 782 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 4.4.2 Stormwater Management Plan Before any construction, a Stormwater management plan will be created and finalized as part of the Construction Phase A stage. For the Stormwater management plan, the applicant will finalize the calculation of Standard Project Flood (SPF), 100-year and 25-year runoff rates for on -site and off -site drainages. The project must have hydraulic analysis utilizing refined runoff rates to determine design water surface elevations and flow velocities along the perimeterflood barriers, Guadalupe Canal, and Dike No. 4; in addition, the stormwater management plan must accomplish the following: 1. Evaluation of flow velocities on a reach -by -reach basis to determine a) lining requirements in terms of materials and lining thickness, b) potential for deposition of sediments, and c) the need for channel stabilization to control scour. 2. Create adjustments to flood protection system configurations (in terms of barrier and levee heights and bridge crossing widths) and refine the hydraulic analysis. Determine the optimum configuration of channels, barriers, and levees with necessary containment and erosion control structures which will provide the 100-year flood protection and blend effectively with natural environment (where appropriate) and the proposed development. 3. Prepare detailed designs and specifications for facilities including containment levees, erosion protection (natural appearing where possible), and channel stabilization structures as may be required. Consideration of re -naturalization, preservation of natural features, and reduction of visual impacts will be made during the various steps. In addition, all drainage facilities for on -site drainage will be designed following the same process. The objectives for the flood control and drainage facilities throughout the Travertine properties are: • Protect all buildings from damage from a 100-year storm in any of the drainage areas that cross or are within the property. • Safely discharge all flows leaving the property • Control sediment, and manage debris flow around the site. • Assure the reliable operation of each drainage feature through a full range of flows from low flows to the design event. • Where levees, channels, or embankments are used, provide adequate freeboard. • Assure that embankment, levee, and channel lining or stabilization is used to control scouring of channel inverts or side slopes. • Re -naturalize, landscape and or use "naturalized contour grading" where feasible and appropriate. 4.4.3 Grading Plan Grading of the project site will occur in two phases. Phase A will be the southerly half of the site, generally south of the Jefferson/Avenue 562 corridor to the edge of the preserved open space. Phase B will grade the balance of the site northward. Given the complexities associated with controlling alluvial fan flow and the sloping nature of the site, creative grading techniques will be necessary shown on Exhibit 4.9, Conceptual Grading Plan and Exhibit 4.10, Slope Ratio Diagram. The area planned to be graded is generally comprised of slopes of between 0% and 10%. The site is elevated, and grading will potentially be visible to areas north of the site. The grading will maintain the natural orientation and drainage of the land by implementing varied contoured grading at 2:1 to 5:1 ratio in conformance with natural terrain. The sections will demonstrate day -lighted slopes to natural, where natural slopes meet the graded slopes, as well as relationships between typical pads, proposed surface improvements, channels, trails, proposed golf uses, grading, reservoir pads, etc. at 4-181Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 783 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN various locations throughout the project. Additionally, all areas adjacent to the General Plan designated open space areas shall comply with the requirements of Section 9.110.070 and 9.140.040 (Hillside Conservation Regulations) of the Municipal Code. All grading will be performed under the supervision of an Engineering Geologist to guarantee a stable site for the intended use. Landscaping and irrigation facilities will be required for all graded slopes greater than 5 feet in height or areas susceptible to erosion. Track mounted portable crushers will be used directly on site, to allow rock crushing to exact grading specification. Rock crushing on site will eliminate the need for exporting rock and importing good fill material while also avoiding traffic congestion, providing dust control, avoiding damage to roads and tracked mud. Future final maps will include detailed grading plans and supporting engineering designs and analyses for review and approval by the City of La Quinta. 4.5 Utilities Electric service to Travertine will be provided by Imperial Irrigation District (IID). An offsite 2.5-acre substation will be required for the Travertine development and may be constructed during the Grading Phase A stage. Currently there are ongoing discussions with local parcel owners, III) and developers, to identify the future offsite substation. All required off -site parcels required for the substation will be chosen to fit the requirements of IID and will be studied with metrics provided bythe utility. The location of the 2.5-acre site will be within a 2-miles of the project. The routing of the proposed service lines along the route to the site will be studied for visual impacts and aesthetics in addition to all other known impact metrics that IID will make available. Telephone service will be provided by Frontier or Spectrum. Southern California Gas Company provides natural gas to the project site. The applicant will comply with the requirements of all utilities. All existing and proposed utilities within or immediately adjacent to the proposed development shall be installed underground. Power lines with voltage higher than 92kV are exempt from this requirement. Energy conservation is the effort made to reduce the consumption of energy by using less of an energy service. It can be achieved either by using energy more efficiently or by reducing the amount of service used. Conservation methods must extend across and overlap with many different types of energy services such as water, electricity, and petroleum products. Energy conservation is an increasingly critical factor in both existing and developing communities across the globe. Many energy conservation measures have been included within the design and land plan of the Travertine community. These range from a land plan that seeks to balance and minimize grading, the use of natural or natural -emulating terrain features (slopes and drainage features) to minimize man-made hardscape features, low water use landscape design, and an extensive system of riding and hiking trails. In addition to these design decisions, additional energy conservation programs exist and will continue to be developed and put into place by regulators at the local, state and federal levels. The on -going physical implementation of the plan will be regulated by additional conservation measures, such as greenhouse gas/emission controls on large scale construction machinery, Title 24 housing requirements, and the reduction and recycling of construction waste materials. The Travertine community will implement all additional regulatory conservation measures that become effective during the course of its development. 4-191Pagc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 784 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 4.6 Public Facilities & Services 4.6.1 Solid Waste Services associated with the collection and disposal of solid waste generated within the Travertine community will be operated and administered by Burrtec per the contract with the City of La Quinta. Individual developments within Travertine will implement measures that will be consistent with City regulations designed to reduce solid wastes, including but not limited to AB 939. 4.6.2 Fire Protection Fire protection service is provided for the City of La Quinta and administered by the Riverside County Fire Department. Presently, the Fire Department occupies three fire stations within the City: Station No. 32 located on Avenue 52 west of Washington Street; Station No. 70 located at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 54; and Station No. 93 located on Adams Street north of Miles Avenue. Currently there is an ongoing discussion with Riverside County Fire Department and the City, to locate and fund the new south La Quinta fire station. At such time the location of the future fire station is determined, the interested parties will join in a "fair share" program to fund its installment. Emergency medical paramedic services are currently provided to the City by American Medical Response, a private paramedic ambulance agency. All water mains and fire hydrants providing the required fire flows will be constructed in accordance with the City Fire Code in effect at the time of development. In addition, the level of service required for Travertine will be aligned with the criteria for Category II - Urban as outlined in the Fire Protection Master Plan as follows: • Fire station located within three miles • Receipt of full "first alarmed" assignment within 15 minutes 4-201Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 785 4.0 INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 4.6.3 Police Protection Law enforcement services are provided to the project site by the City of La Quinta Police Department through a service contract with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The La Quinta Police Department will provide service to the project site from existing facilities located at City Hall in the City of La Quinta. The current service agreement between the City and the Sheriff's Department provides protection on a 24-hour basis, seven days per week. The Sheriff's Department utilizes seven patrol deputies which result in typical response times of five minutes throughout the City. 4.6.4 Community Services & Facilities A large public library is located on Calle Tampico and is operated by the Riverside County Library System to serve City of La Quinta residents and visitors. The City of La Quinta is served by two school districts: the Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) and the Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD). The majority of the site is located within the CVUSD area. A small portion on the eastern side of the project site is within DSUSD boundaries. No school sites are proposed within the Travertine project site. 4.6.5 Recreation The recreation plan will include a network of trails, including both on -street and off-street trails, which will provide pedestrian opportunities for both residents and visitors (see Exhibit 2.2). A small parking and staging areas will be provided along Avenue 62 where it enters project site from the East. The trailhead is intended to facilitate use of the trails. The off-street trails will account for approximately 2 acres. The onsite and off-street trail system inside the gates provides users a system that connects the planning areas north and south of Jefferson Street. The applicant will meet the City Parks dedication requirements as set forth in Chapter 13.48, of t he Municipal Code and in compliance with the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan. Credit shall be granted for onsite parks against park fees. 4-211Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 786 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES AND ADMININSTRATION 5 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES AND ADMINISTRATION This section of the Travertine Specific Plan Amendment describes the mechanisms for implementing the Plan and is to be consulted whenever there is a question concerning the Plan implementation in relation to the subsequent actions that may be proposed within the Travertine Development area boundary. As the City of La Quinta is the public agency responsible for the administration of the Travertine Specific Plan Amendment, the tools and procedures described in this section are to be implemented consistent with all City rules, regulations and policies. 5.1 Procedures The entitlement procedures required for future development applications within the Travertine community shall be in conformance with those procedures established and set forth in the City of La Quinta Municipal Code, except as noted below. All development applications shall be reviewed by the City of La Quinta as to their consistency with the intent of this Specific Plan. 5.2 Financing Plan The infrastructure and public facilities improvements, as generally described in the Conceptual Grading and Construction Phasing Plan, will be financed in various ways and may include, but not limited to those programs as outlined below: • Developer contribution with reimbursement agreements • Developer contribution with credits against fees The final financing arrangements, including participation agreements, if any, shall be determined prior to or concurrently with the recordation of the applicable Final Map and shall be reviewed and approved by the City of La Quinta as well as all affected agencies if necessary. 5.3 Maximum Allowable Development The Travertine Specific Plan permits a maximum of 1,200 dwelling units to be constructed within the Specific Plan area. If Planning Areas 1 and/or 11 are developed to include residential housing, the maximum number of permitted dwelling units in Travertine will remain at 1,200 units. Transfer of Dwelling Units No amendment to this Specific Plan shall be required to transfer dwelling units between planning areas, provided that the following development transfer conditions are met: A. Each residential Planning Area allowing residential land uses (i.e., Low Density Residential and Medium Density Residential) is assigned a target number of dwelling units. B. The project master developer may increase or decrease dwelling unit counts in any residential planning area, with the concurrence of the City's Planning Division. The Design and Development Director shall have the authority to determine if the transfer is in substantial conformance with the provisions herein and in the Travertine Plan Statistical Table (Table 12), or if a Specific Plan Amendment is required. C. Dwelling units may be transferred into Planning Areas 1 and/or 11 subject to the approval of a Conditional Use Permit. D. In no case shall dwelling units be transferred into planning areas designated as Open Space. E. A transfer of units may be approved up to a 20% increase above the otherwise permitted density range for that Planning Area, i.e., Low Density Residential 4.0 du/ac plus 20% or Medium Density Residential 8.0 du/ac plus 20%, as listed within the Statistical Table (Table 12). 5-11 TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 787 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES AND ADMININSTRATION 5.4 Statistical Table The Travertine Statistical Table (Table 12) provides details regarding the permitted density range for the development of each residential planning area. The table identifies each residential area as either a Low Density or a Medium Density Residential District with a corresponding permitted density range. The table then lists a preliminary or targeted number of dwelling units for each area. Additionally, as detailed in Section 5.3 Maximum Allowable Development/Transfer of Dwelling units, Travertine Statistical Table also described the parameters of the maximum allowable transfer of units to each Planning Area, so long as the maximum number of 1,200 dwelling units is not exceeded. The master developer shall be responsible for maintaining an accurate and up-to-date Statistical Table that reflects the number and location (by Planning Area) of all approved dwelling units, whether by tentative map, conditional use permit or other actions. The schedule of approved units shall be complied with in a method and manner acceptable by the Planning Manager. Table 12 - Travertine Statistical Table PA Land Use Acres Permitted Density Range*** Target # of Units Density Range plus 20% 1 Resort/Spa* 38.3 2 Medium Density Residential 25.9 4.0 - 8.0 du/ac 205 249 3 j Low Density Residential 29.4 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 85 141 4 Low Density Residential 9.6 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 27 46 5 Low Density Residential 16.2 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 31 78 6 Medium Density Residential 20.1 4.0 - 8.0 du/ac 163 193 7 Low Density Residential 18.7 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 61 90 8 Low Density Residential 16.9 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 73 81 9 Medium Density Residential 14.8 4.0 - 8.0 du/ac 74 142 10 Low Density Residential 25.6 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 75 123 11 Resort / Golf ** 46.2 12 Low Density Residential 52.2 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 107 251 13 Low Density Residential 26.7 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 48 128 14 Low Density Residential 39.0 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 65 187 15 Low Density Residential 33.3 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 70 160 16 Low Density Residential 50.4 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 116 242 17 Open Space Recreation 18.1 18 Open Space Recreation 14.7 19 Open Space Recreation 23.1 20 Open Space Natural 301.2 21 1 Master Planned Roadways 35.0 Totals 855.4 1,200 * 100villa units within PA 1 are excluded from maximum permitted 1,200 dwelling units **potential units within the Resort/Golf Land Use designation will be residential dwellings consistent with Zoning Code and will be counted as partof the 1,200dwelling unit maximum 'the numberof proposed dwelling units within any Residential Planning Area mayexceed the Permitted Density Range by20%as long as the maximum numberof 1,200dwelling units is met 5-21Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 788 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES AND ADMININSTRATION 5.5 Determination of Development Standards Within the Planning Areas designated as Low Density Residential, four product types may be constructed in conformity of Table 13 as determined by the lot area of an individual building site. Each Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Permit submitted shall include a table listing the lot area of each residential building site and identify the product type to be built upon that lot. The approval of the Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Permit will establish the product type for each lot. The Design and Development Director may approve a product type on a lot of otherwise substandard area upon the review of an exhibit demonstrating the relative setbacks and separations of the lot and all adjacent lots. If it is determined that the variation will be in general conformance with the design guidelines of the Specific Plan (Section 3), the Director shall approve the variation. The Director's approval may occur after the approval of the Tentative Tract Map and can be considered with a Modification by Applicant. Table 13: Development Standards for Low Density Residential Product Estate Luxury SFD Large SFD Mid SFD Minimum Lot Size 9,000 sq. ft. 7,000 sq. ft. 6,000 sq. ft. 5,500 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width, Detached' 70 feet 60 feet 55 feet 50 feet Minimum Lot Depth 100 feet 100 feet 100 feet 90 feet Minimum Cul-de-Sac 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet 40 feet Lot Width Maximum Structure Height 2 22 feet 22 feet 28 feet 28 feet Maximum Stories 2 2 2 2 Minimum Front Yard 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Setback Minimum Garage Setback' 18 feet 18 feet 18 feet 18 feet Minimum Interior Side Yard Setbacks' 7.5 feet 7.5 feet 5 feet 5 feet Minimum Exterior Side Yard Setbacks' 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard 25 feet 20 feet 15 feet 5 feet Setback Maximum Lot Coverage 35% 35% 40% 45% 'The Design and Development Director can administratively approve modifications of the standards up to 15% to account for irregular lotting situations. Please refer to the City of La Quints Municipal Code Section 9.50.070 Irregular lots, for irregular lot specifications. 'Building height will be measured from finished building pad elevation. 'All setbacks are measured from the property line. Side -loaded garages may encroach up to 5 feet into the front yard setback. °Mechanical equipment shall be allowed within side yard setback area with a minimum three-foot clearance to the side property line. 'Perimeter Streets for the Travertine Specific Plan area are Loop Street East and West Jefferson Street Avenue 62 and the Madison EVA. 5-31Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 789 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES AND ADMININSTRATION Within the Planning Areas designated as Medium Density Residential, two product types may be constructed in conformity of Table 14 as determined by the lot area of an individual building site. Each Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Permit submitted shall include a table listing the lot area of each residential building site and identify the product type to be built upon that lot. The approval of the Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Permit will establish the product type for each lot. The Director may approve a product type on a lot of otherwise substandard area upon the review of an exhibit demonstrating the relative setbacks and separations of the lot and all adjacent lots. If it is determined that the variation will be in general conformance with the design guidelines of the Specific Plan (Section 3), the Director shall approve the variation. The Director's approval may occur after the approval of the Tentative Tract Map with a Modification by Applicant. Table 14: Development Standards for Medium Density Residential Product Small Lot SFD Single Family Attached Lot Size 5,000 sq. ft. 4,000 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width, Detached 1 45 feet 35 feet Minimum Lot Depth' 80 feet 70 feet Minimum Cul-de-Sac Lot Width 35 feet 35 feet Maximum Structure Height z 28 feet 28 feet Maximum Stories 2 2 Minimum Front Yard Setback 10 feet 15 feet Minimum Garage Setback' 18 feet 5 feet Rear Yard Setbacks 15 feet 10 feet Minimum Interior Side Yard Setbacks' S feet 7.5 feet Minimum Exterior ide Yard Setbacks 10 feet 10 feet Maximum Lot Coverage 55% 55% 'The Design and Development Director can administratively approve modifications of the standards up to 15% to account for irregular lotting situations. Please refer to the City of La Quints Municipal Code Section 9.50.070 Irregular lots, for irregular lot specifications. 2Building height will be measured from finished building pad elevation. 'All setbacks are measured from the property line. 'Mechanical equipment shall be allowed within side yard setback area with a minimum three-foot clearance to the side property line. 'Perimeter Streets for the Travertine Specific Plan area are Loop Street East and West, Jefferson Street and Avenue 62. 5-4 1 P a g e TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 790 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES AND ADMININSTRATION 5.6 Conceptual Grading and Construction Phasing Plan The primary intent of the phasing of the Travertine development, as conceptually depicted in Exhibit 5.1 and Exhibit 5.2, is to ensure that complete and adequate public facilities and services are in place and available for the residents and visitors to the community. The project grading and construction will take place in three phases. Phases 1A and 1B will grade the southern half of the project, improve and extend Avenue 62 into the Specific Plan area, and provide an EVA to cross the CVWD ponds and Dike 4 to connect to Madison Street. The connection point of the EVA within the community will be subject to the review and approval of more specific tract -level design. Grading Phase 1B will grade an additional land area north of the central roadway spine increment that is sufficient to accommodate the construction of the first 600 units within the Specific Plan. Grading and construction within Phases 1A and 1B are identified separately because this area would be able to accommodate the maximum amount of unit construction that may occur until the second major point of connection (the extension of Jefferson Street from the north and into the community), is constructed and operable to serve the community. Following the completion of the grading in areas 1A and 113, grading activities for the remaining project area may continue into Grading Phase 2, and later Phase 3. However, unit construction within these two Phases is dependent upon the completion of the second access to Jefferson Street. As development in Travertine and the surrounding community continues, market conditions as well as infrastructure design and improvements may evolve and change, and may necessitate changes to the phasing program anticipated and described herein. Upon the review and confirmation by the City of La Quinta that any such changes meet the intent of the Specific Plan, adequately serve the needs of the community, and do not require preparation of a subsequent or supplemental Environmental Impact Report pursuant to Public Resources Code section 21166 and California Code of Regulations, title 14 (CEQA Guidelines), section 15162, these revisions shall be permitted without an amendment to this Specific Plan and the Development Director may determine, consistent with CEQA Guidelines sections 15162(b) and 15164, whether to prepare a subsequent negative declaration, an addendum, or no further documentation. If the developer proposes to phase improvements and obligations required by the Conditions of Approval, phasing plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Division for review and approval by the City Engineer. The phasing plans are not approved until they are signed by the City Engineer. 5-51Pane TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 791 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES AND ADMININSTRATION Table 15: Phasing Plan Summary PA Land Use Acres Target Units Villas PHASE 1 (1-A and 1-B) 5 LDR 16.2 31 7 LDR 18.7 61 8 LDR 16.9 73 9 MDR 14.8 74 10 LDR 25.6 75 11 Resort / Golf 46.2 12 LDR 51.7 107 13 LDR 26.7 48 14 LDR 39.0 65 15 LDR 33.3 70 18 Open Space Recreation 14.7 19 Open Space Recreation 23.1 20 Open Space Natural 301.2 Phase 1 Totals 628.6 604 4 6 16 LDR MDR LDR 9.6 20.1 50.4 27 163 116 Phase 2 Totals 80.1 306 PHASE 3 1 Resort / Spa 38.3 100 2 MDR 25.9 205 3 LDR 29.4 85 17 Open Space Recreation 18.1 Phase 3 Totals 111.7 290 100 Build Out Total 820.4 1,200 Master Planned Roadways (35.0 ac.) are not included in the Grand Total. Master Planned Roadways are built throughout the project from south- east of the project site to the north-west 5-61Pane TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 792 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES AND ADMININSTRATION Exhibit 5.1— Conceptual Grading and Construction Phasing %} 7? AVEN!!E 5P mat 1� --- cdocsra�Er PHASE 3 ij PHASE 2 f •�06a Si F<EE7 y� �! "'PHASE 'f•B �a �r ? i PHASE 9-A � ram• 7 v//K( Neck Slide ` 4 ,; TANKS ••,,` � - ' V- AVEMEW AVENUrW I 5-71 P a g e TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 793 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES AND ADMININSTRATION 5.7 Maintenance Plan The primary objective of the Maintenance Plan is to ensure that the Travertine community establishes and maintains the highest standards of quality with regard to the upkeep of improvements and facilities. Common landscape areas and/or recreational facilities within individual developments will be maintained by an assigned Homeowners Association governing that development. Landscaping within the private streets' rights -of -way is proposed to be maintained by the Master Property Owners Association (POA) and Home Owners Association (HOA). Entry monumentation, master common landscape areas, and other areas commonly owned shall be maintained by a POA to be established by the developer. Common landscape areas and/or recreational facilities within individual developments will be maintained by an assigned HOA governing that development. Landscaping within the private streets' rights -of -way is proposed to be maintained by the Master POA and HOA. Entry monumentation, master common landscape areas, and other areas commonly owned shall be maintained by a Master POA to be established by the developer. All resort facilities will be privately owned and maintained. The following matrix, Table 16, identifies the maintenance responsibilities for the Travertine development. Table 16: Maintenance Responsibilities Maintenance Responsibilities City Master Property Owners Association (POA) Home Owners Association (HOA) Private Major Entries X Public Streets within project boundaries X Public Streets outside project boundaries, within City jurisdiction (Median landscaping only) X Private Streets X X X Master Common Landscape X Golf Course X Recreational Facilities X X X Resort Complex X Common Landscape X Flood Control Facilities X 5-8 1 P a g e TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 794 5.0 IMPLEMENTATION MEASURES AND ADMININSTRATION 5.8 Amendments The Design and Development Director shall have the authority to determine substantial conformance with the provisions of this Specific Plan when changes in unit counts within individual planning areas are less than or equal to 20% and consistent with the density exchange parameters described in Section 5.3. Specific Plan modifications initiated by the developer shall be submitted to the Planning Division in writing. Any changes shall be processed per the provisions contained in the Government Code Section 65453 and will be subject to the requirements of Section 9.240.010 (Specific Plan Review) of the Municipal Code. If the Director determines that the modification(s) is (are) minor (less than or equal to 20% change and consistent with the density exchange parameters described in Section 5.3 ), the Director may approve the modification(s) without further administrative review. Modifications are considered minor when the result in a less than or equal to 20% change and are consistent with the density exchange parameters described in Section 5.3. Other types of changes, including but not limited to architecture design changes found to be consistent with design guidelines, or changes in the landscape palette of less than 20% deviation may be approved by the Director. If the Director determines that the modification(s) may result in a significant change in the project, the modification(s) shall require an amendment to the Specific Plan and will be referred to the decision - making authority specified in the Municipal Code. 5-91Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 795 6.0 APPENDIX G APPENDIX 6.1 Consistency with City of La Quinta General Plan An assessment of the proposed Amendment's consistency with applicable General Plan goals, policies and programs is provided below. Land Use GOAL LU-1 Land use compatibility throughout the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides diverse and high -quality housing, tourist commercial, resort and spa, skills golf course with club facilities, and park and recreation opportunities that meet the needs of its residents and bring tourism to the City. The Travertine Specific Plan establishes and maintains connections between existing neighborhoods and the Specific Plan neighborhoods. GOAL LU-2 High quality design that complements and enhances the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides many high -quality design elements that will ensure the following: a wide array of residential housing; integrates recreational uses; provides tourist commercial uses, preserves open space, and protects scenic views. GOAL LU-3 Safe and identifiable neighborhoods that provide a sense of place. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan incorporates design guidelines that will ensure high quality architecture and landscaping. The residential enclaves will be cohesive in design and character and recreational facilities will be consistent with their surrounding neighborhood. The master -planned community of Travertine is designed to complement the surrounding development in the area, incorporating residential, tourist commercial, open space, and park areas into a cohesive plan complementary to uses in the vicinity of the project. This Specific Plan is designed such that compatible land uses, open space areas, landscaped manufactured slopes, and elevation changes serve as buffers between the planned Travertine community and surrounding open space land uses. GOAL LU-5 A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides a mix of housing types that include medium, and low -density housing types, designed with enhanced architecture and landscaping, and access to pedestrian walkways, providing a walkable community for the residents. Circulation GOAL CIR-2 A circulation system that promotes and enhances transit, alternative vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian systems. 6-11Pagc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 796 6.0 APPENDIX Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan provides a master planned roadway system with a network of bicycle/pedestrian pathways designed to meet the needs of residents, safely and efficiently transport people and goods, and accommodate the projected residential growth within the community. Livable Community GOAL SC-1 A community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides a master planned community that includes over 357 acres of open space (including natural, passive and active areas) which is served by a network of pedestrian, bike and hiking trails, will connect residents and visitors to amenities to meet both active and passive needs. Residents will also have two community parks as well as localized pocket parks within neighborhoods. Visitors and residents will have access to a golf academy, and resort/ spa facilities. Residences will be designed in conformance with high architectural standards. CEC Energy Efficient Standards (CBC Title 24) will be required for all residential and non-residential uses. Solar systems, both passive and active, will take advantage of the year-round abundant sunshine. Green Building technology will be promoted to improve resource efficiency in the residential and tourist serving commercial uses. Economic Development GOAL ED-1 A balanced and varied economic base which provides the City a fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan includes tourist commercial uses that will accommodate and attract residents of the city and visitors, offer new employment opportunities, and contribute to a strong and diversified economic base. The project developer will pay its reasonable fair -share of impact fees and improvement costs to fund the infrastructure improvements and other public facilities necessary to service the planned development. GOAL ED-2 The continued growth of the tourism and Resort/Spa industries in the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan allows for resident and tourist commercial uses that complement and support one another and will help maintain a strong sales and property tax base. The tourist commercial components of the Specific Plan will promote transient occupancy tax, retail, restaurants, and other support uses in a pedestrian -friendly environment which will enhance the fiscal growth potential and real estate values of the City and the Travertine community. Parks, Recreation and Trails GOAL PR-1 A comprehensive system of parks and recreation facilities and services that meet the active and passive needs of all residents and visitors. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will provide many recreational opportunities, including: two community parks (totaling approximately 13 acres), 6 miles of walkable trails that circumnavigate the 6-21Panc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 797 6.0 APPENDIX community and an additional 5 miles of trails interior to the project providing for a walkable community for the residents. Residential development areas will also have additional localized pocket park areas within the neighborhoods. On -street bike lanes will make it convenient to ride around the project for exercise and local transportation. A Class II bikeway will be constructed on the Jefferson Street/Avenue 62 as well as the Loop Streets for the use and enjoyment of La Quinta residents. These amenities will also provide access to the project's 55.9 acres of recreational open space, and 301 acres of natural open space (including the 152 acres of habitat preservation), as well as the resort/ spa and the golf academy. Housing GOAL H-1 Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan is designed to provide a range of housing types and densities at varying price points that will help meet the anticipated demand for housing within different economic segments of the City. GOAL H-5 Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons. Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan developer will encourage the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination in lending practices and in the for -sale or rental housing. GOAL H-6 Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan incorporates sustainable design strategies that promote energy and water conservation measures. The project is designed to control water runoff and avoid contamination of water resources. All HOA maintained landscaped areas will be designed in a water - efficient manner and drought tolerant plants will be used throughout the individual neighborhoods, the resort/spa and golf course. Title 24 compliance is required for all construction. Air Quality GOAL AQ-1 A reduction of air emissions generated within the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will expand routes for golf carts and neighborhood electric vehicles, and plan for accessing and recharging facilities at the resort/spa and the golf academy facility. The plan provides an extensive pedestrian and bicycle network of paths, approximately 11 miles of such trails in addition to the on -street bike lanes that will be provided, to allow safe and convenient access to recreational and community facilities. Proposed development air quality emissions and greenhouse gas emissions shall be analyzed under CEQA and adhere to the City's GHG Reduction Plan. All construction activities will minimize emission of all air quality pollutants, grading activities shall adhere to established fugitive dust criteria. The project will implement the air quality mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR. 6-31Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 798 6.0 APPENDIX Energy and Mineral Resources GOAL EM-2 The conservation and thoughtful management of local mineral deposits to assure the long-term viability of limited resources. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will preserve any local mineral resources identified by the Department of Mines and Geology and to the greatest extent possible designate those undeveloped lands as Open Space. The project will implement mineral deposit resource mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR if necessary. Biological Resources GOAL B10-1 The protection and preservation of native and environmentally significant biological resources and their habitats. Consistency Analysis: The project has designated 152 acres of protected habitat area along the southern, western, and eastern boundaries of the site. This preserve area will protect known biological resources, including the important habitat for the Bighorn Sheep. The project will implement biological resource mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR. The designated habitat area also includes areas of cultural resources to be protected. Cultural Resources GOAL CUL-1 The protection of significant archaeological, historic, and paleontological resources occur in the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will preserve any significant archaeological and historic resources to the greatest extent possible. The project has been redesigned to preserve all nine cultural resources identified that are within or intersect the project. The project will implement mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR. Water Resources GOAL WR-1 Support the Coachella Valley Water District in its efforts to supply adequate domestic water to residents and businesses. Consistency Analysis: The project will utilize drought tolerant landscaping on all HOA maintained slopes and parkways. The resort/wellness center and the golf academy and its facilities will predominately use water wise landscaping and judicially reduce the use of turf in the golf skills course area. Open Space and Conservation GOAL OS-1 Preservation, conservation and management of the City's open space lands and scenic resources for enhanced recreation, environmental and economic purposes. 6-41Pagc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 799 6.0 APPENDIX Consistency Analysis: The Travertine plan preserves 301 acres for habitat and natural preservation purposes. The vistas of the Santa Rosa Mountains, Coral Mountain and other scenic resources will not be disrupted. Noise GOAL N-1 A healthful noise environment which complements the City's residential and Resort/Spa character. Consistency Analysis: The project complements the City's residential and Resort/Spa character. The project EIR addresses the potential impacts of noise associated with the proposed development. The Specific Plan will incorporate appropriate design measures and adhere to all applicable restrictions and requirements identified in the EIR to ensure that the potential impacts are mitigated to below a level of significance. Soils and Geology GOAL GEO-1 Protection of the residents' health and safety, and of their property, from geologic and seismic hazards. Consistency Analysis: The project EIR addresses the potential impacts of natural hazards associated with the proposed development. The Specific Plan will incorporate appropriate design measures and adhere to all applicable restrictions and requirements identified in the EIR to ensure that the potential impacts are mitigated to below a level of significance. Flooding and Hydrology GOAL FH-1 Protection of the health and safety, and welfare of the community from flooding and hydrological hazards. Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan includes preservation and avoidance of the larger areas related to the identified Middle North and Middle South storm flows to address flooding concerns. Additionally, development has been sufficiently set back from the natural water courses to assure adequate protection of life, property, and habitat values. A reinforced flood protection barrier along the western and southern edge of development will provide flood protection for flows from the adjacent open space and directing the flows to downstream off -site areas along Dike No. 4 and the Guadalupe Dike thereby protecting the project from off -site flows. Hazardous Materials GOAL HAZ-1 Protection of residents from the potential impacts of hazardous and toxic materials. Consistency Analysis: Development of the project will be evaluated in the EIR and the project will implement all measures identified in the project EIR to protect the residents' safety from potential impacts from hazardous and toxic material. 6-51Panc TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 800 6.0 APPENDIX Emergency Services GOAL ES-1 An effective and comprehensive response to all emergency service needs. Consistency Analysis: Fire protection and emergency response services to the Specific Plan Area will be provided by the City and County. The service levels of fire and police protection needed to adequately serve the Travertine community will be identified and addressed in the Environmental Impact Report being prepared in conjunction with this Specific Plan. Although Madison Street, south of Avenue 60, would be removed as a public right of way, it will be improved as an emergency vehicle accessway (EVA) for access into the Travertine community. During the phased construction of the community, interim solutions have been identified and will be implemented to ensure required access for fire and emergency services will be available at all times. Water Sewer & Other Utilities GOAL UTL-1 Domestic water facilities and services which adequately serve the existing and long-term needs of the City. Consistency Analysis: The domestic water needs will be provided by Coachella Valley Water District. The water assessment analysis for the Travertine community will be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report being prepared in conjunction with this Specific Plan. GOAL UTL-2 Sanitary sewer facilities and services which adequately serve the existing and long-term needs of the City. Consistency Analysis: The sewer needs and facilities will be provided by Coachella Valley Water District. The sewer services assessment analysis for the Travertine community will be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report being prepared in conjunction with this Specific Plan. 6-61Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 801 6.0 APPENDIX 6.2 Reference Table and Exhibit 1. Table 12 - Travertine Statistical Table PA Land Use Acres Permitted Density Range *** Target # of Units Density Range plus 20% 1 Resort/Spa* 38.3 2 Medium Density Residential 25.9 4.0 - 8.0 du/ac 205 249 3 Low Density Residential 29.4 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 85 141 4 Low Density Residential 9.6 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 27 46 5 Low Density Residential 16.2 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 31 78 6 Medium Density Residential 20.1 4.0 - 8.0 du/ac 163 193 7 Low Density Residential 18.7 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 61 90 8 Low Density Residential 16.9 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 73 81 9 Medium Density Residential 14.8 4.0 - 8.0 du/ac 74 142 10 Low Density Residential 25.6 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 75 123 11 Resort / Golf ** 46.2 12 Low Density Residential 52.2 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 107 251 13 Low Density Residential 26.7 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 48 128 14 Low Density Residential 39.0 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 65 187 15 Low Density Residential 33.3 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 70 160 16 Low Density Residential 50.4 2.0 - 4.0 du/ac 116 242 17 Open Space Recreation 18.1 18 Open Space Recreation 14.7 19 Open Space Recreation 23.1 20 Open Space Natural 301.2 21 Master Planned Roadways 35.0 Totals 855.4 11200 * 100 villa units within PA 1 are excluded from maximum permitted 1,200 dwelling units ** potential units within the Resort/Golf Land Use designation will be townhome and/or multifamily dwellings consistent with Zoning Code and will be counted as part of the 1,200 dwelling unit maximum *** the number of proposed dwelling units within any Residential Planning Area may exceed the Permitted Density Range by 20% as long as the maximum number of 1,200 dwelling units is met 6-71Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 802 6.0 APPENDIX 2 - Exhibit 2.1 Travertine Land Use Plan CCAONaV V u�� MOUDW17 otika ,5 d SFD aFFF£4 +oRnrwa rr IK � ui� r A � - XiR AIX�7L Ob{ I,�✓ �Y ti}. � FAG �i�lpp.1 hrtN 250►G � . ai�a�e ice' ry�� iiK Li.]F' y fe,°.� r34rni E{SF 4VEAVEd2 LW GLMWAW ST MnY I.erl r i�iZJ aura R, a ,erl rw ba �xx inert r4 KITIOL/. Rmk Slide 1.1 _1GOJD 0 UP oenarlY ROBH AI'61 - 318 k 0 open spice e Reueewmm- 563Fe MFbr,m NnF 1p lteudanl sl- dot Ae open f,"m, Nerorol. m1 3 A, Ulwhxbd�e 0654A. I ..d . Galr Cub . M i k Mrsler alennetl React M . 3&0 dr. 6-81Page TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT - 2023 803 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX EXHIBIT E o� X w Q z H I 0 z I In 0 i z z w i z Q J (Z i Q i 0 0 0 m In 0 6 z L3 3 d I 0 oj d N O IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM EASEMENTS AND PARCELS (SEE SHEETS M-03 & M-04 FOR EASEMENT NOTES) EXISTING AFFECTED EASEMENT PARCELS NUMBER 1 1 — 7 2 8 — 11, 13 3 8, 9, 11 4 1, 5, 6, 8 — 12 5 9 6 8 7 8 3 9 7 10 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 11 12 12 4, 6, 7, 14 13 (INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK) 14 17 15 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 16 10 17 1 — 7 18 13, 14, 16, 17 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 19 17 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 20 15, 17 21 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 22 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 23 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 24 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 25 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 26 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 27 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 28 (LOCATION CANNOT BE DETERMINED) 29 19 VICINITY MAP PGA WEST a J x U Y Q J AVENUE 58 w � 9F 9�F cr �2 AVENUE 60 o�F W 05 z NAP 20 Z o jro Q TRILOGY LA QUINTA o cn 0 0 O U M AVENUE 62 s N TS PROJECT SITE Z 0 U 0 of AVENUE 64 RIVERSIDE COUNTY ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 753-040-014, 753-040-016, 753-040-017, 753-050-007, 753-050-029, 753-060-003, 764-280-057, 764-280-059, 764-028-061, 766-110-003, 766-110-004, 766-110-007, 766-110-009, 766-120-001, 766-120-002, 766-120-003, 766-120-006, 766-120-015, 766-120-016, 766-120-018, 766-120-021, 766-120-023 SHEET INDEX: PROJECT INDEX SHEET 1 01 TENTATIVE MAP SHEET: TITLE SHEET M 01 SECTION SHEET M 02 DETAIL SHEET M 03 DETAIL SHEET M 04 DETAIL SHEET M 05 DETAIL SHEET M 06 DETAIL SHEET M 07 DETAIL SHEET M 08 DETAIL SHEET M 09 DETAIL SHEET M 10 DETAIL SHEET M 11 DETAIL SHEET M 12 DETAIL SHEET M 13 DETAIL SHEET M 14 EXISTING SPECIFIC PLAN: SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 94-026 AMENDMENT NO. 1 LAND USE: EXISTING: VACANT PROPOSED: COMMERCIAL, RESIDENTIAL, GOLF COURSE AND OPEN SPACE GENERAL PLAN: EXISTING: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TOURIST COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE — RECREATION OPEN SPACE — NATURAL GENERAL COMMERCIAL MASTER PLANNED ROADWAYS PROPOSED: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TOURIST COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE — RECREATION OPEN SPACE — NATURAL MASTER PLANNED ROADWAYS ZONING: EXISTING: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM/HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL TOURIST COMMERCIAL GOLF COURSE OPEN SPACE MASTER PLANNED ROADWAYS PROPOSED: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL TOURIST COMMERCIAL OPEN SPACE MASTER PLANNED ROADWAYS AREA: GROSS AREA: 37,261,904 SF/ 855.4 AC LIMITS OF GRADING: 22,826,008 SF/ 524.0 AC PARCEL 13: (APN: 753-040-016) THENCE NORTH 00'14'08" WEST 30.00 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF MADISON STREET, ALSO BEING THE THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 34 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00014'08" WEST 1953.83 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A POINT ON THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF. NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID INSTRUMENT NO. 053692; EXCEPTING THEREFROM 1/2 OF ALL MINERAL RIGHTS BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 1984 AS THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 89'48'15" EAST 98.67 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE; INSTRUMENT NO. 84-265643 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL 14: (APN'S: 766-120-006 AND 766-120-016) THENCE SOUTH 01'34'58" WEST 156.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'29'17" WEST 362.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE SOUTH HALF 01'36'06" WEST 205.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00256'31" EAST 180.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00004'19" EAST OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, 631.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'10'49" WEST 168.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03'03'00" EAST 25.26 FEET; TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES THENCE SOUTH 00'46'14" WEST 176.88 FEET; PARCEL 3A: GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF. THENCE SOUTH 27'28'20" EAST 54.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF AVENUE 62 A NON—EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND UPON EACH OF THE TWO STRIPS OF REAL PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 17, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 32692, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, REPLACEMENT AND USE FOR ALL EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, PER DOCUMENT COUNTY; PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OF A ROAD AND OF WATER AND ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION PIPES, LINES RECORDED NOVEMBER 12, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-0597136, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AND ALL EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES, AND OTHER UTILITIES; LEGAL DESCRIPTION FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY ORDER NUMBER: NHSC-6717950 DATE: JANUARY 11, 2022 PARCEL 1: (APN'S: 766-110-003 AND 766-120-001) THE WESTERLY 300.00 FEET OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF, 1452.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID WESTERLY LINE, 300.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES, 1452.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 300.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 33, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33 BEARS NORTH 00 DEG 01' 00" WEST, 920.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG 26' 27" EAST 300 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG 01' 00" EAST 400.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 29' 45" WEST 300.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1 /4; THENCE NORTH 00 DEG 01' 00" WEST 400.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 33, DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 0 DEG 01' 00" EAST, 1320.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG 29' 45" EAST, 300.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 300.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 33; PARCEL 2: (APN: 766-110-004) THE NORTH 3/5 OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN BY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 3/5 BEING PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 300.00 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL 3: (APN: 766-110-007) THENCE SOUTH 00'14'08" EAST 661.28 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 18: (APN: 764-280-057) THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 10, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0113798, OFFICIAL RECORDS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN (S.B.M.), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTH 89'48'23" EAST 101.24 FEET ALONG CENTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTER SECTION LINE SOUTH 00'12'45" WEST 10.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20'12'35" EAST 13.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'37'20" WEST 248.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'19'43" EAST 90.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00'09'35" WEST 228.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02'58'47" WEST 61.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01'34'58" WEST 8.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE AS DESCRIBED WITHIN SAID GRANT DEED; THENCE SOUTH 89'48'15" WEST 98.67 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF MADISON STREET, ALSO BEING THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTH 00'14'08" WEST 661.28 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 19: (APN'S: 764-280-059 AND 764-280-061) THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEEDS RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 1997 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 053692 AND 053694, BOTH OFFICIAL RECORDS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING THE WEST 3/5TH OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN BY EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL DEPOSITS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO MERIDIAN (S.B.M.), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 3/5 BEING PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE PROSPECT FOR, MINE, AND REMOVE THE SAME, ACCORDING TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OF CONGRESS OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; APPROVED JUNE 1, 1938 STAT. 609), AS RESERVED IN THE PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 AS COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; INSTRUMENT N0. 352836 OFFICIAL CIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHERLY 100.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 400.00 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED HALF INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS AND HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND ALL MINERALS, WHETHER METALLIC OR NON—METALLIC, IN, UNDER OR ON, OR WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED, EXTRACTED OR REMOVED FROM SAID LANDS, WHICH INTEREST IS SO LIMITED, HOWEVER, THAT THE OWNERS THEREOF HAVE NO RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS OR REGRESS IN, OVER OR ACROSS, OR RIGHT TO DRILL, EXPLORE FOR, MINE OR REMOVE SAID OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS BY OPERATIONS ON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, BUT HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXPLORE FOR, MINE AND REMOVE SAID OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS FROM SAID REAL PROPERTY A DEPTH OF FIVE HUNDRED FEET OR MORE BELOW THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY BY SLANT DRILLING, SHAFTS, TUNNELS, OR OTHER MEANS OR OPERATIONS ON OR FROM LAND OTHER THAN SAID LAND. SAID STRIPS OF REAL PROPERTY ARE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE WESTERLY 30.00 FEET AND THE SOUTHERLY 30.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY 30.00 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL 4: (APN: 766-110-009) THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN BY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF; EXCEPTING THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED HALF INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS AND HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND ALL MINERALS, WHETHER METALLIC OR NON—METALLIC, IN, UNDER OR ON, OR WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED, EXTRACTED OR REMOVED FROM SAID LANDS, WHICH INTEREST IS SO LIMITED, HOWEVER, THAT THE OWNERS THEREOF HAVE NO RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS OR REGRESS IN, OVER OR ACROSS, OR RIGHT TO DRILL, EXPLORE FOR, MINE OR REMOVE SAID OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS BY OPERATIONS ON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, BUT HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXPLORE FOR, MINE AND REMOVE SAID OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS FROM SAID REAL PROPERTY A DEPTH OF FIVE HUNDRED FEET OR MORE BELOW THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY BY SLANT DRILLING, SHAFTS, TUNNELS, OR OTHER MEANS OR OPERATIONS ON OR FROM LAND OTHER THAN SAID LAND. PARCEL 5: (APN: 766-120-002) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 15: (APN: 766-120-018) BEING A PORTION OF PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 3 OF QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED MARCH 2, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2006-0152345, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN (S.B.M.), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "A" COMMENCING AT THE CENTER —SOUTH ONE SIXTEEN CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTH 89'46'28" EAST 880.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH ONE HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 89'46'28" EAST 121.48 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 00*11'01" EAST 660.95 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH ONE HALF OF THE SOUTH ONE HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33 SOUTH LINE SOUTH 89'47'10" WEST 121.48 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 00'11'01" WEST 660.92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 16: (APN: 766-120-021) BEING A PORTION OF PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED MARCH 12, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-0121018, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN (S.B.M.), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "A" COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT REAL PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT NO. BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; 2008-0121018, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE EAST SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF, 1452.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID WESTERLY LINE, 300.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'47'10" WEST 129.91 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH ONE HALF OF THE THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES, 1452.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; SOUTH ONE HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 300.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 6: (APN: 766-120-003) THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 300 FEET THEREOF; PARCEL 9: (APN: 753-040-017) THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF. THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 89'47'10" WEST 129.91 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 00'14'08" WEST 661.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PROPERTY; PARCEL 10: (APN: 753-040-014) THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THENCE NORTH 89'46'28" EAST 129.92 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF. PARCEL 11: (APN: 753-050-029) THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN. PARCEL 12: (APN: 753-060-003) ALL OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 50' 58" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 4 A DISTANCE OF 2644.21 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 49' 39" EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 4 A DISTANCE OF 1091.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEG 08' 54" WEST A DISTANCE OF 301.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 26 DEG 40' 44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 583.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 DEG 03' 05" WEST A DISTANCE OF 913.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG 19' 09" WEST A DISTANCE OF 523.06 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55 DEG 53' 25" WEST A DISTANCE OF 545.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86 DEG 15' 16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 668.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 DEG 18' 58" WEST A DISTANCE OF 248.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47 DEG 47' 20" WEST A DISTANCE OF 285.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 37 DEG 17' 03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 352.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 55' 17" WEST A DISTANCE OF 268.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73 DEG 28' 11" WEST A DISTANCE OF 330.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44 DEG 46' 57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 235.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28' 57' 52" WEST A DISTANCE OF 399.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 13 DEG 40' 56" WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.51 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG 55' 20" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 999.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89'47'10" WEST 224.62 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 802.00 FEET, A LINE RADIAL TO SAID CURVE AT SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 38'23'25" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 360.07 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25'43'25", A LINE RADIAL TO SAID CURVE AT SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 64'06'50" EAST; THENCE SOUTH 00'14'08" EAST 277.63 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 17: (APN: 766-120-023) PARCEL 7: (APN: 766-120-015) THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED MARCH 2, 2006 AS THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE WEST 880 FEET OF THE INSTRUMENT NO. 2006-0152345, AS PARCEL 5, OFFICIAL RECORDS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN. MERIDIAN (S.B.M.), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 8: (APN: 753-050-007) THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF. ALSO EXCEPTING AN UNDIVIDED THREE —SIXTHS (3/6) INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS, AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES, AND ALL MINERALS, WHETHER METALLIC OR NONMETALLIC, IN, UNDER OR ON OR WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED, EXTRACTED OR REMOVED FROM SAID REAL PROPERTY. COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTH 00'14'08" WEST 661.28 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY, ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 89'47'50" WEST 101.67 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. APPLICANT/DEVELOPER HOFMANN LAND DEVELOPMENT CO. P.O. BOX 907 CONCORD, CA 94522 (925) 478-2000 ENGINEER/SURVEYOR PROACTIVE ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 27042 TOWNE CENTRE DRIVE, SUITE 110 FOOTHILL RANCH, CA 92610 TEL:(949) 716-7460 CONTACT: MARK ANDERSON, PE H N THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT PM�� 617 PMB 2 1 80-83 \APN: 766-020-008 \ INDIO 40 INVESTMENT MAP NO, 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM SERVICES SEWER: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT PHONE: (760) 398-2651 WATER: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT PHONE: (760) 398-2651 GAS: THE GAS COMPANY PHONE: (909) 335-7706 ELECTRIC: IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT PHONE: (760) 398-5841 TELEPHONE: FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS PHONE: (760) 778-3620 CABLE TV: SPECTRUM PHONE: (760) 340-2225 USA: UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT PHONE: (800) 227-2600 SCHOOL: COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PHONE: (760) 416-6000 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT PHONE: (760) 777-4200 GENERAL NOTES 1. SEWAGE DISPOSAL AND WATER SUPPLY WILL BE PROVIDED BY COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT TR 32201 APN: 766-080-003 66-080-007 MB 405129- 55'-� \ USA \ APN: 0 APN: 766-080-005 AVENUE 60 66-U 06 LO WAVE LISA CASTRO j — 55', � - DEVELOPMENT LLC T APN 766-110-010 55' SHEET T " \ APN: \ GUILLERMO RAUL o I I \ 766-100-003 APN: 766-110-018 \ �I CASILLAS M USA o USA APN. LV �\ \ W APN: 766-110-017 766-180-011 TO 4 o �, APN: 766-110-002 g TRAVERTINE CORP USA 766-170-015 SUBDIVISION C \ ANS \ \ Z \BEET 31-EET M-03 — APN: 766-110-006 APN: 766-110-012 \ \ Q \ l APN: 766-110-018 WILLARD KELSEY APN: 766-110-011 CVWD ISHEET M-i0 USA CVWD \ SHEET M-04 \ —�-- — io � TR 30023-1 SHEET M-13 SHEET M-11 SHEET M-05 / IAPN: 766-110-008 APN: 766-110-014 30 APN: 766-110-004 APN: 766-110-007 WILLARD KELSEY \ 30, MB 329/87-102 TRAVERTINE CORP TRAVERTINE CORP I I APN. 766-110-013 CVWD \ \ CVWD II �I � \ \ SHEA LA QUINTA APN: 766-110-009 � APN: 766-110-017 \ TRAVERTINE CORP USA \ o \ SHEET M-12 SHEET M-06 \ \ SHEET M-14 APN 766-110-005 I APN, 766-110-015 V APN: 766-100-003 USA 2. FEMA FLOOD ZONE- ZONE "D" (AREAS IN WHICH FLOOD COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE HAZARDS ARE UNDETERMINED, BUT POSSIBLE) 3. CITY OF LA QUINTA BENCHMARK NO. 770 - 3.5" BRASS CITY OF LA OUINTA DISK IN TOP OF CURB, FLUSH, LOCATED SOUTH EAST Y OF INTERSECTION OF MADISON STREET AND AVENUE 60. I I I o Y NAVD88 DATUM, ELEVATION:-30.897 z � Y o oQ ¢ 0 2 p W O W J I p I O 2 W O O O O 02�:51 I ��� W 2 ^ Z 8 Z O I zp� 1� ¢ I Z J ^�2z I SEC.5 T7SWE I , I � � Z W Cl APN: 753-050-028 EMILIO CARL MELILLO 0 0 LL 0 Z 0 0 n O O O O W I I I ago a� Q �¢ APN: 753-050-029 TRAVERTINE CORP MARIA J ALLGOOD CVWD APN: 766-280-058 CVWD M- NAP C� APN: 766 80-057 Q SHEET, T6S, R7E, SB L— TRAVERTINE CORP --\A— — APN: 766-120-004 APN: 766-120-005 I \ CVWD CVWD APN: 766-120-011 \ TR 35996 3165-69 SHEET INDEX I USA \ \SHEA MB 3LA QUINTA \ APN: 766-120-007 APN: 766-120-009 o I \ \ CVWD CVWD of z \ oo cl Lo \ APN: 766-120-006 \ TRAVERTINE CORP APN: 766- Q I \ o \ z t2o-o17 \ \ CVWD Vc \ APN: 766-120-016 APN: 766-120-003 I TRAVERTINE CORP TRAVERTINE CORP APN: \ I o \ N� o APN: 766-120-013 766-120-0 2 14i APN: 764-280 059 \ PN: 766-120-018 CVWD CVWD TRAVERTINE CORP �p M TRAVERTINE CORP W 1 fl 3W23-1 APN: 766-280-060 \ \ \ a ¢,- \ \ CVWD Z APN MB 329/87-102 \ APN: 766-120-021 RS 1311,87� o 764-280-006 APN \\ \\ TRAVERTINE CORP 764-280-028 .P RICHARD J MEYER/ \ I SUZANNE M MEYER TRIOLOGY AT II \ \ APN: 766-120-015 APN: 764-280-062 LA QUINTA APN APN TRAVERTINE CORP CVWD APN MAINTENANCE ASSN. 764-280-056 764-280-030 \ APN: 7\ 764-280 APN CVWD APN CVWD64-280-061 TRAVERTINE CORP I \ CBGM 764 ��� 054 764-280-054 AVENU \62 753-070-017----""o \ r / _ 753-070-018 I 753-070-027 753-070-031 753-070-028 � / \ APN: 7USA 70-010 1 I I I \ I \ \ APN: 753-070-011 z I I I 1 � USA Q I I I I O I I I I I APN: 753-070-003 ` ^ I I I / NORMAN LOFTHUS I I T7S, WE, SBM - a / APN: 753-070-004 APN: 733- of BGBE INV OZ..- 5 ^o APN: 753-060-003Irl TRAVERTINE CORP APN: 753- 070-005 APN: 753-070-016 \ TRAVERTINE USA Q CORP � � I w i LEGAL DESCRIPTION o�Q c> � o�Q I I �+ > o I > APN: 753-050-007 z l N z I I o Z I TRAVERTINE CORP 30' -j O Ir 30 ^p� ZOO ZOO U= ZO-� aW_o rLWo z-"' aW_o Q J J Q J � g Q J U3IU� r,W = zs W I �' I N APN: 753-050-008 r o o W WI WILLARD KELSEY ^�� I o� I oho ado d,z Z5 500 250 0 500 1000 1500 I ¢ I I APN: 753-050-014 APN: 753-050-013 MARC AVRIETTE & , TRAVERTINE CORP LESLIE AVRIETTE SCALE: 1"=500' APN: 753-120-023 APN: 753-1 USA JAY JAMSH, MARYAM TE APN: 753-060-004 USA MARTINEZ ROCK SLIDE o CITY OF LA QUINTA i ?0/' COUNTY O * RIVERSIDE 75 JA 3 TR002 Q Q \ ` APN: 753-080-004 z Ee \ APN: 753-080-001 APN: 53- 80-016 ESTATE OF BEATRICE \ SA� Q CRANE o \ \ J \ 0� 0 \ \� D \� \ U U APN: 753-080-005 \ TRAVERTINE APN: 753-080-002 CRISTINA PETERSON & \ TIMOTHY BOPP \ \ 30APN: 753 ' 080-012 30' \MARIA J ALLGOOD\�,I_ cn APN: 753-080-003 I APN: 753-080-006 - AVENUE 64 TRAVERTINE CORP �— TRAVERTINE - APN: 753-130-005 APN: 753-130-007 APN: 753-130-009 APN: 753-130-003 USA USA USA T---USA APN: 753-080-008 APN: 753-080-009 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM SEE PROJECT INDEX SHEET FOR COMPLETE LEGAL DESCRIPTION. r- 00 0 z a Q U a a z Li I N N Cl N N c v 805 m 3 w w I CD I Ln 0 z w / z Q w !L w ra 0 0 0 in 0 0 (U / z d 0 m I CU oj CD (U cU d N O N THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA R/W I R/W TENTATIVE TRACT 84' 15' 812' 14' 12' 8' 15' MAP NO, 37387 2' PARKWAY BIKE LANE TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE BIKE LANE PARKWAY 2' 6' S-9' 3'-9' 6' PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 MEANDERING I MEANDERING SIDEWALK SIDEWALK AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM �qR .7 s 2q 2 4 4 2 2% <2, 2% %_u_iii-iii_ui_2%-i rii-lil=iii:, STRIPED MEDIAN (0-600 UNITS) RAISED MEDIAN (601+ UNITS) JEFFERSON STREET (PUBLIC) N.T.S. R/W R/W STATION: 10+00-140+50 60 EX. EX. 20' 20' S'LY N'LY R/W � R/W R/W PROP. VARIES 4' 6' 8' 12' 12' 8' 6' 4' VARIES 60' SLOPE & DRAINAGE I SIDEWALK BIKE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE BIKE SIDEWALK I SLOPE & DRAINAGE 10' EASEMENT LANE LANE EASEMENT 30' 30' I RIVERSIDE COUNTY 3' CITY OF LA QUINTA K-RAIL 1 1 2 K-RAIL 2 2% 2% SLOPE EASEMENT 13' 8' 12' 6' 12' 8' 6' 5' SLOPE EASEMENT BIKE LANE TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE BIKE LANE SIDEWALK �P� ----- ------------- 2'� �,. I I HEADWALL 15' PARKWAY/PUE VAR( 6' 9' 8' 2' SIDEWALK LANDSCAPE BIKE MINI LANE 2% HEADWALL �:� MPx.I=IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII _I�I�I�III _I�I�I�III -II ----- ------------ -111� 11=I I I� I I -III_ PREFABRICATED CONCRETE ARCH A AVENUE 62 (PUBLIC) EXISTING FINISHED GRADE N.T.S. / STATION: 140+50-152+00 GUADALUPE CROSSING EX. N.T.S. S'LY R/W 1 80' 70' 40' 20' 20' 12' 12' TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE 2% STREET "D", "Ga (PRIVATE) N.T.S. 15' PARKWAY/PUE 8' 9' 6' IVAR BIKE LANDSCAPE SIDEWALK 2' LANE (MIN 2% EX. WILY R/W RIVERSIDE COUNTY I CITY OF LA QUINTA I I 2' 10' 1, 8' 12' 6' 12' 8' 6' 4' 10' BIKE LANE TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE BIKE LANE SIDEWALK 1 x FENCE 1 2 2% _ -- 2% 2% FENCE 5 2 �T.IDIIIWIMAII RETAINING WALL EXISTING GRADE H VARIES 4' TO 35't B AVENUE 62 (PUBLIC) N.T.S. STATION: 152+50-160+00 RETAINING WALL H VARIES 4' TO 35't EX. R/W 50' R/W R/W S'LY R/W 80' 2' 5' 5' 20' 20' 5' 5' 2' 11' 19' 27' PUE (SIDEWALK SIDEWALK( PUE RIVERSIDE COUNTY CITY OF LA QUINTA I � I I 1 �qX MPS EXISTING GRADE 9' 2' 8' 12' 6 12' 8' �P 2% 2% 2% 2% MqX BIKE LANE TRAVEL LANE MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE BIKE LANE SECTION NOTES STREET "A", "B", "C", "E", "P. "H", ala, 'in (PRIVATE) N.T.S. 94' FMFR(,FN('Y VFHI('1 F A('('FCS 2' 2'7 Mq,K 2' D:1 MADISON EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS N.A.P. ACCESS ROAD SECTION 5 ACCESS ROAD N.T.S. Q1 MINIMUM 4" A.C. ON 6" CLASS II AGGREGATE BASE. 2Q 8" CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF LA QUINTA STD. DWG. NO. 202 Q3 6' SIDEWALK PER CITY OF LA QUINTA STD. DWG. NO. 240. ® 6" MEDIAN CURB CITY OF LA QUINTA STD. DWG. NO. 210. 55 6' MEANDERING SIDEWALK PER CITY OF LA QUINTA STD. DWG. NO. 245. © 1 6" CURB AND GUTTER PER CITY OF LA QUINTA STD. DWG. NO. 201 0 STRIPED MEDIAN J EX 24' PAVEMENT �I C AVENUE 62 (PUBLIC) N.T.S. STATION: 160+00-191 +41 EXISTING GRADE 23' 3'-15' 6' 2' MEANDERING SIDEWALK r EX. N'LY R/W EXISTING GRADE 1 MPy,. I EXISTING BLOCK WALL 44A - LOT DESIGNATIONS AND AREA: 1 3.75 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "AA" 5.19 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 2 4.98 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "BB" 1.60 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 3 14.32 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "BC" 0.07 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 4 12.96 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "CC" 1.24 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 5 24.69 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "CD" 0.92 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 6 15.66 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 7 7.56 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "DD" 0.60 AC -OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 8 6.09 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "EE" 1.68 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 9 16.92 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "FF" 11.25 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 10 13.79 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "GG" 9.11 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 11 21.37 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "HH" 16.20 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 12 12.70 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "II" 2.23 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 13 30.37 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "JJ" 1.68 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 14 2.47 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "KK" 0.90 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 15 4.57 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "LL" 0.76 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 16 29.73 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 17 2.24 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "MM" 1.76 AC -OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 18 4.08 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "NN" 1.58 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 19 1.71 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "00" 3.59 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 20 9.74 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "PP" 1.36 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 21 10.72 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "QQ" 4.33 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 22 7.28 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "RR" 1.99 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 23 1.53 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "SS" 2.82 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 24 3.55 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "TT" 6.11 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE TRAIL 25 2.30 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "UU" 1.13 AC -OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 26 3.54 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 27 2.83 AC - FUTURE PARK/OPEN SPACE LOT "W" 2.87 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 28 1.34 AC - FUTURE PARK/OPEN SPACE LOT "WW" 0.07 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 29 1.94 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "XX" 1.57 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 30 1.48 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "W" 3.19 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 31 8.70 AC -FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "ZZ" 2.26 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 32 6.90 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "AB" 0.88 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 33 3.74 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "AC" 2.83 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE/TRAIL 34 8.39 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "AD" 1.23 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 35 1.13 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "AE" 7.35 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 36 1.65 AC - FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT LOT "AF" 2.71 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 37 8.58 AC - ACCESS/WATER FACILITIES LOT "AG" 1.71 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 38 0.32 AC - FUTURE BOOSTER STATION LOT "AH" 3.46 AC -OPEN SPACE/SLOPE 17.12 AC - PUBLIC STREET LOT "Al" 4.71 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "B" 9.62 AC - PRIVATE STREET LOT "AJ" 2.18 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "C" 5.70 AC - PRIVATE STREET LOT "AK" 3.68 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "D" 4.31 AC - PRIVATE STREET LOT "AL" 1.62 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "E" 2.34 AC - PRIVATE STREET LOT "AM" 7.11 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "F" 0.70 AC - PRIVATE STREET LOT "AN" 0.85 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "G" 1.48 AC - PRIVATE STREET LOT "AP" 2.59 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "H" 3.00 AC - PRIVATE STREET LOT "AT 0.23 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "I" 0.84 AC - PRIVATE STREET LOT "AR" 3.91 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "J" 4.20 AC - PRIVATE STREET LOT "AS" 4.01 AC - OPEN SPACE/RECREATION/UTILITIES LOT "K" 18.37 AC - OPEN SPACE/RECREATION LOT "AT" 3.37 AC - OPEN SPACE/RECREATION/UTILITIES LOT "L" 20.69 AC - OPEN SPACE/BASIN LOT "AU" 6.27 AC - OPEN SPACE/BASIN LOT "M" 113.06 AC - OPEN SPACE LOT "AV" 1.56 AC - OPEN SPACE LOT "N" 22.64 AC - OPEN SPACE/RECREATION LOT "AW" 0.14 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "0" 50.88 AC - OPEN SPACE/RESTRICTED LOT "AX" 0.31 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "P" 56.00 AC - OPEN SPACE/RESTRICTED LOT "AY" 0.46 AC - OPEN SPACE/SLOPE LOT "Q" 36.99 AC - OPEN SPACE/RESTRICTED LOT "R" 5.56 AC - OPEN SPACE/RECREATION NUMBER OF COMMON AREA, OPEN SPACE, AND NON -BUILDABLE LOT "S" 3.11 AC - OPEN SPACE/RECREATION LOTS: 73 LOT "T" 5.53 AC - OPEN SPACE/RECREATION NUMBER OF BUILDABLE LOTS: 38 LOT "U" 0.53 AC - PRIVATE STREET LOT "V" 0.22 AC - PRIVATE WALK LOT "W" 6.49 AC - OPEN SPACE R/W 180' R/W 25' 20' 90' RAISED MEDIAN 20' 25' 6 PARKWAY 8' 12' 45' 45' 12' 8' PARKWAY 6 SIDEWALK VARIES BIKE LANE TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE BIKE LANE VARIES SIDEWALK I 2% I 1 - 2% ROUNDABOUT N.T.S. 806 m W I in 0 / z / z w / z Q J !L J ra / 0 0 0 in 0 0 OU Z 3 d M In I CU oj O CU cu c- d N O 'Il rn 1,00 N M CO t0 APN: 766-110-015 CVWD O Lo o O z 30' L- PARCEL 7A II II II II It a III J w II Q N LOT *JJ' (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) 1.68 AC II II I APN: 766-120-004 CVWD _co II I n� O t� N89'45'47"E --62.01'� U n W • cfl W I� cj)� LOT 'LL (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) 0.76 AC I 11 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 21.37 AC APN: 766-120-004 CVWD N89'45'47"E 662.01' LOT Wr (OPEN SPACE/RECREATION/UTILITIES) 2 1R. 00 N APN: 766-110-015 CVWD I �c 'o IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM APN: 766-120-005 CVWD APN: 766-120-007 CVWD N89'46'07"E 339.40' LOT "AT7 (OPEN SPACE _ /SLOPE) 2�, - - 3.38 AC 8' PUBLIC ACCESS TRAIL 1 R ALIGNMENT SUBJECT TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPROVAL I0 N I O M M 3 0 III O Z APN: 766-120-017 CVWD SEE SHEET M-04 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE: 1"=100' APN: 766-110-017 USA 7 I` I 24' MADISON EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS ROAD \ IS89°44'47"W 101.24' I N00°12'45"E 10.19' � cq 00 N20'12'35"W 13.99' `V w N01°19'43"W 90.88' 18.59' EASEMENT FOR MADISON EMERGENCY I VEHICLE ACCESS ROAD NO2°58'47"E 61.50' I LOT "W" � (OPEN SPACE) 6.81 AC APN: 766-120-009 APN: 766-120-010 APN: 766-120-011 CVWD CVWD USA 0 N 0 0 z 00 06 N N w in 0 0 0 0 z 0 w 00 �n 0 z w EASEMENT NOTES FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY ORDER NUMBER: NHSC-6717950 DATE: JANUARY 11, 2022 EXCEPTION/EXCLUSION NUMBER (#) PER CURRENT TITLE REPORT 1 AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, IN FAVOR OF ALBERT E. SCHWABACKER, JR., A ETHEL S. SOKOLOW AND (12) JOHN L. SCHABAKER RECORDED OCTOBER 15, 1951 AS BOOK 1310, PAGE 289 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS; AND A QUITCLAIM DEED MODIFYING SAID EASEMENT AND RIGHTS WAS RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1956 IN BOOK 1969, PAGE 485 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (NOT PLOTTABLE) 2 A RESERVATION OF A STRIP OF LAND 200 FEET IN WIDTH, LYING EQUALLY ON EACH SIDE OF EACH MAIN TRACK, SIDE TRACK, SPUR, SWITCH AND (16) BRANCH LINE, AS THE SAME ARE NOW, OR MAY HEREAFTER BE CONSTRUCTED UPON, ACROSS OR ADJACENT TO THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY; ALSO A RESERVATION OF THE RIGHT TO USE WATER NATURALLY RISING UPON OR FLOWING ACROSS THE HEREIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY FOR THE OPERATION AND REPAIR OF RAILROAD, AS SET OUT IN DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC LAND COMPANY, A CORPORATION, RECORDED MAY 21, 1958 IN BOOK 2274 PAGE 399, OFFICIAL RECORDS. (NOT PLOTTABLE) QAN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF FRED W. SNODGRASS AND ALICE C. SNODGRASS (17) FROM ROBERT Y. ALLEN, RECORDED MARCH 19, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1959-022788 AND DECEMBER 10, 1971 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1971-0140921 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. QAN EASEMENT 30 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF SECTION LINES IN FAVOR OF THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAYS, AS EVIDENCED BY PETITION DATED (9) JANUARY 9, 1901 AND RECORDED APRIL 17, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 32692 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. Q5 AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL (18) PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF F. HECHINGER AND DORIS HECHINGER, RECORDED AUGUST 5, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1959-067955 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 6 AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS, PUBLIC UTILITIES AND INCIDENTAL (19) PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF F. HECHINGER AND DORIS HECHINGER, RECORDED JULY 5, 1960 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1960-058923 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 7 AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, IN (20A) FAVOR OF DESERT RANCH HOMES, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, RECORDED JULY 27, 1961 AS INSTRUMENT 1961-064366 AND 1961-064368, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 8 AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF DESERT PROPERTY CONSULTANTS, RECORDED JULY 27, 1961 (21) AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1961-064372 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 9 AN EASEMENT FOR FLOOD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RECORDED OCTOBER 22, 1965 AS (23) INSTRUMENT NO. 1965-0120832 AND RECORDED JANUARY 17, 1966 AS (55) INSTRUMENT NO. 5584, BOTH OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS IN THE PATENT DO RECORDED DECEMBER 21, 1906 AS BOOK 3, PAGE 348, OFFICIAL (10) RECORDS. (NOT PLOTTABLE) 11 AN EASEMENT FOR MONITORING WELL ACCESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED (26) JUNE 29, 1995 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1995-0209729 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 0 THE TERMS AND PROVISIONS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "AGREEMENT FOR RIGHT OF ENTRY AND TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION (62) EASEMENT" RECORDED SEPTEMBER 19, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-0514551 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS IN FAVOR OF CVWD. 0 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK EASEMENTS, COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THE DEED FROM 4 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, A PUBLIC AGENCY OF THE STATE OF (39) CALIFORNIA, AS GRANTOR, TO TRAVERTINE CORPORATION, A MINNESOTA CORPORATION, AS GRANTEE, RECORDED MARCH 26, 2009 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2009-0148257 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 0 RIGHTS, RIGHTS OF WAY, RESERVATIONS AND EXCEPTIONS IN THE PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 352836, OFFICIAL (25) RECORDS. (NOT PLOTTABLE) (CONTINUED ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE SHEET M-04) LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE -- RIGHT OF WAY --- --- LOTLINE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE LOT ACCESS SEE SHEET M -02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES 00 r7 M 0 z n- LLJ U Q Q z w I N N O N N C -1 A 11 1\ (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) s� 21.37 AC \ \ LOT "AW" \ (OPEN SPACE \ s�� /SLOPE ) \ 0.14 AC \ 9 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) \ \ �� �5 \��i-�. 16.92 AC �g \ \ LOT "C" LOT 'WA \ / (OPEN SPACE 2 i % /SLOPE) 2.87 AC \ 31 W� = LOT AX /N '^ (OPEN SPACE a v, /SLOPE) W 0.31 AC I II I 10 ,< (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 0 0 13.79 AC ' ,� n° � 11 ' Ivy o 'n �110 If toil N / v Q_ 00 I LOT 'AM' (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) \ \ 7.11 AC (PRIVATE STREET) 5.42 AC LOT "C" (PRIVATE STREET) 5.42 AC IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM 487 13 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 30.37 AC APN: 766-120-017 CVWD APN: 766-120-019 CVWD 70' 04 00' — — 444' ' 107' �,N 84 TO BE QUITCLAIMED 13 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 30.37 AC LOT "AN" I (OPEN SPACE o, /SLOPE) IN 0.85 AC II I II I' 63� AVENUE 62 LOT AN (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) 0.85 AC LOT 7" (PRIVATE STREET) 0.70 AC �0_I APN: 766-120-013 CVWD 8' PUBLIC ACCESS TRAIL ALIGNMENT SUBJECT TO THE CITY ' OF LA QUINTA APPROVAL N89'47 18'E 1293.10 1558' _ — 489' I \ 11.72' EASEMENT FOR MADISON EMERGENCY \ VEHICLE ACCESS ROAD \ \ SEE SHEET M- N N r2 � I 0 O z N89°46'34"E 129.92' 4 M 0 'a z I I APN. 766-120-022 \ I I CVWD )l I OT 11W 'AD moo. (OPEN SPACE) 6.49 AC / W 38 (FUTURE BOOSTER o�0 1 / /r��� STATION) v, / 4 0.32 AC Z Irin L0 T "AS" (OPEN SPACE/RECREATION/UTILITIES) 4.01 AC CP o II II LOT "AU" (OPEN SPACE /BASIN) 12 6.27 AC TO BE QUITCLAIMED II (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) co 12.70 AC III LOT `AS "___­� (OPEN SPACE/RECREATION/UTILITIES) 4.01 AC 53' I I I lb I I (PRIVATE STREET) �h 0.53 AC — o� 249' 80 172 ' - _ 89TO BE G� LOT "AP" RELOCATED _— ( OPEN SPACE 152 /SLOPE) 4 � _ 30' S03`03'00"E 25.26' 4 30' 03 N 0 C,w 0 r� 0 z 0 0 N N co ^v 0 10 1 N w coo 6, o 0 � N 0 0 0 0 Cn } a Q �o 00 0 2. EASEMENT NOTES FIRST AMERICAN TITLE COMPANY ORDER NUMBER: NHSC-6717950 DATE: JANUARY 11, 2022 EXCEPTION/EXCLUSION NUMBER (#) PER CURRENT TITLE REPORT AAN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF F. HECHINGER AND DORIS HECHINGER, RECORDED JULY 27, (22) 1961 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 64388 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. AN EASEMENT FOR FLOODING, OVERFLOW, SUBMERGING AND INCIDENTAL Q (24) PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA RECORDED MAY 20, 1966 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 53146 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 18 THE EFFECT OF AN EASEMENT 30 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF SECTION LINES (32) IN FAVOR OF THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAYS, AS EVIDENCED BY PETITION DATED JANUARY 9, 1901 AND RECORDED APRIL 17, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 32692 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 19 AN EASEMENT FOR RAILROAD AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN THE (33) DOCUMENT RECORDED MAY 14, 1908 IN BOOK 263 OF DEEDS, PAGE 164. ® THE TERMS, PROVISIONS AND EASEMENT(S) CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED "CONTRACT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT" RECORDED JANUARY 17, (36) 1966 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 5584 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 21 AN EASEMENT 30 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF SECTION LINES IN FAVOR OF (41) THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAYS, AS EVIDENCED BY PETITION DATED JANUARY 9, 1901 AND RECORDED APRIL 17, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 32692 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 22 A RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES AND CANALS AS RESERVED BY THE UNITED (42) STATES OF AMERICA IN THE PATENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 6, 1922 IN BOOK 8, PAGE 217 OF PATENTS. 23 AN EASEMENT FOR ANY IRRIGATION, DRAINAGE AND STORM -WATER (43) PROTECTION WORKS AND CANALS, LATERALS AND APPURTENANT WORKS AND STRUCTURES AS MAY BE NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT FOR DISTRICT PURPOSES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 1944 IN BOOK 658, PAGE 175 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 24 AN EASEMENT FOR RIGHT OF WAY FOR DISTRIBUTION OF WATER AND (44) INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED JUNE 25, 1956 IN BOOK 1932, PAGE 403 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 25 AN EASEMENT FOR RIGHT AND PRIVILEGE AND EASEMENT TO FLOOD, (45) OVERFLOW, SUBMERGE, AND SEEP SAID LAND AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RECORDED OCTOBER 21, 1965 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 120163 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. 26 AN EASEMENT 30 FEET ON EACH SIDE OF SECTION LINES IN FAVOR OF (52) THE PUBLIC FOR PUBLIC HIGHWAYS, AS EVIDENCED BY PETITION DATED JANUARY 9, 1901 AND RECORDED APRIL 17, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 32692 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. 27 A RIGHT OF WAY FOR DITCHES AND CANALS AS RESERVED BY THE UNITED (53) STATES OF AMERICA IN THE PATENT RECORDED FEBRUARY 6, 1922 IN BOOK 8, PAGE 217 OF PATENTS. 28 AN EASEMENT FOR ANY IRRIGATION, DRAINAGE AND STORM —WATER (54) PROTECTION WORKS AND CANALS, LATERALS AND APPURTENANT WORKS AND STRUCTURES AS MAY BE NECESSARY OR CONVENIENT FOR DISTRICT PURPOSES AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED DECEMBER 27, 1944 IN BOOK 658, PAGE 175 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. ® AN EASEMENT FOR RIGHT AND PRIVILEGE TO FLOOD, OVERFLOW, (56) SUBMERGE, AND SEEP SAID LAND AND INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, IN FAVOR OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, RECORDED APRIL 18, 1966 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 40072 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (64) THE LACK OF A RIGHT OF ACCESS TO AND FROM THE LAND. LEGEND "o — — BOUNDARY LINE o CENTERLINE \ I SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE S27°28'20"E 54.03' RIGHT OF WAY SOO* 12' 10"E 30.00' z=B00' L=97' , I N89'47'50"E 122. 4' — - - - - — LOTLINE 145 N89'47'50"E 2110' 15 EASEMENT R=558 L=91� — — 0� 2.59 AC / LOT "AV" �j1 1 g 7 (OPEN SPACE) 1.56 AC cp � 14 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) �h \` 2.47 AC SEE SHEET M-05 �\ ? LOT "WW" ,:4 (OPEN SPACE) >, , 0.07 AC LOT "L" (OPEN SPACE/BASIN) 20.69 AC 100 50 0 100 PARCEL LINE EX R/W <==> LOT ACCESS W SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES I.LI cr L PREPARED BY: I O W W_ �w I u_, PR(IACTIVI 01 a W ENGINEERING CONSULTANT 27042 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 110 Foothill Ranch, CA 92610 (949) 716-7460 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37387 200, 1 300 A PORTION OF S 33 TFS R71F Rc A SCALE: 1"=100' co M 0 z Q U Q z Li I N N O N N C_ 0 \ 89p. (PUBLIC Ep \ 17.12 AC \ \ \LOT 'AF' (OPEN SPACE \ /SLOPE) `sue 2.71 AC IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA 7 FNTA7 IVF 7 RAr,.7 MAP NC) rl7flR7 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM SEE SHEET M-04 14 ti (FUTURE �RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) �� ► �,\ 13 �p-�, ����s.� LOT �WW� (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) �\'��`�o ,�`� ��j , (OPEN 0.07AC SPACE) 30.37 AC 0 o i I � � 17 lool \ o_ zo \ / / 16 �525' 241 LOT'AM' (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) (PUBLIC STREET) / M `o- 7.11 AC 17.12 AC / a s \ /LOT AF \ / (OPEN SPACE �� / `� 60 /SLOPE) �o ��' „\ LOT "L" / 2.71 A � ' (OPEN SPACE/BASIN) / 60� � � � -P 20.69 AC \ / �15 lol* SA —=105�98 i RSON R _ � , L-14j4 i i T=T / , - I � \ � R=1142 ' L=1402 � _ — 18 I N 132 — — 135' 142 \ I (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL N DEVELOPMENT) 4.08 AC I ' 60' .p s 151 LOT 'AL' ( OPEN SPACE �s• \ `�o�, /SLOPE ) 1.62 AC r � c� 1 19 16 C (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) DEVELOPMENT) N 29.73 AC W 1 1.71 AC N W N \ \\ s\ \ cl) m W "LOT 'D' ♦W♦^ (PRIVATE STREET) N v, 4.31 AC 17 1 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL' `NP DEVELOPMENT) 2.24 AC I I O � N 00 �Irn I M LOT 'AJ 394 � M LOT 'AL' ( OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) o I (OPEN SPACE / 2.17 AC /SLOPE) 1.62 AC 15� — 107� / 21 150' _ R=505' L=184' 241' R=475' L=173' _ (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL 14� 105, �41 R=445' L=16 1071 AC 40A,DEVELOPMENT) LOT'AR' 2' LOT 'J' (PRIVATE STREET) 4.20 AC 8' PUBLIC ACCESS TRAIL ALIGNMENT SUBJECT TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA APPROVAL LOT 'M' - (OPEN SPACE) 111.45 AC I I GV m� 1 I 'y 1 ` a I � I I - I I I 15 `n (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 4.57 AC 2' 14" /Cb N�'� (OPEN SPACE \ "'E� 164' .� .,�2, 00 /SLOPE) 1 g30' � 150' 0 105 . 4 3.91 AC / R,180p 1=148 400 259 169, 5 / kp0 v 17' A -145' ��0.�� � � 2 j 145' 262' R,3640, ' 55' OT "� 5173 Rp'L40�01' ,p1 401' LJ13605 ' PUBLIC ACCESS 7RAIL (PRIVATE STREET) 122 BALIGNMENT SUBJECT TO THE CITY 20 4.20 AC OF LA QUINTA APPROVAL 00 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 2gg 122 376' 9.74 AC 1g6' 224' 74' 32' 37172' 111' 62' 124' SEE SHEET M-06 J' M LOT 'AK' (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) 1 3.68 AC Lo LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE -- RIGHT OF WAY W --- --- LOTLINE ♦^�♦^ EASEMENT V, WPARCEL LINE LOT ACCESS — SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES W 0 z 0 IU o 0 o� u� 30' 30' z w J M C co M N N W J = J M Q W uA' 0 0 b _ Lo z V) 06 N Lo g 0 o adz 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE: 1"=100' r- co n r7 0 z a U cr- z w I C'4 N O N N c 0 809 IN THE CITY OF LA QUIN TA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA rn L,J V) L5 3 d L0 N I N N 0 N N c d N O �7 2ss•,.. \ 240. \S9• 269• N 239, 284, W \ W 2SS, r= V, W tissso \ W S� SR3S , COACHELLA VALLEY MULTI -SPECIES HABITAT \ CONSERVATION LINE \ \ bs, . V9 '\ TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM MARTIN= ROCK SLIDE AWN: 753-060-004 x USA x x O O Lo 0` 2 LOT "P" (OPEN SPACE/RESTRICTED) 56.00 AC LOT "N" (OPEN SPACE/RECREATION) 22.64 AC SEE SHEET M-05 LOT "M" (OPEN SPACE) 113.06 AC As9, SEE SHEET M-07 \ °s• 272' 173' yl� �6• h/ 156' rn �I LOT "0" (OPEN SPACE/RESTRICTED) 50.88 AC 125� \ \ Z 51 Q LL 0 V (o 00 PM co N fo 0 0 0 z W 0 cr W cc U- O Z 0 0 ou O U O n m W W I► E2 A4 30' 4 � 30' f j z o18 I W O � m W 0 W 4 I �7 30' 4 � 30' 'o 0 26� _ 94• LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE -- RIGHT OF WAY - - — LOTLINE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE <==> LOT ACCESS SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE: 1"=100' 00 0 z d Q U a o' ui Z Li I N N Cl N N C v 810 IN THE CITY OF LA QUIN TA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA m J I cl) Ln O Z Z W Z Q J !L J Q 0 0 0 Ln CD CD 0j / z 3 d 011 CU I CU CU 0 CU CU c- d N i-' i-' O '21 MARTINEZ ROCK SLIDE APN: 753-060-004 USA CITY OF LA QUINTA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AVENUE 64 APN: 753-130-003 USA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM LOT "P" (OPEN SPACE/RESTRICTED) 56.00 AC APN: 753-130-005 USA SEE SHEET M-06 425' — — LOT "N" (OPEN SPACE/RECREATION) 22.64 AC 272' 261' \�6g, COACHELLA VALLEY MULTI -SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION LINE LOT "0" (OPEN SPACE/RESTRICTED) 50.88 AC O M I'7 N89'56'45"W 1540.15' APN: 753-130-007 USA LOT "0" (OPEN SPACE/RESTRICTED) 50.88 AC 4 30' 4 � 30' io rn co N to o O 0 o z Z 5 0 Q J U- O m� u i W co W LL 0 1�: M 0 U LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE -- RIGHT OF WAY - - - - — LOTLINE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE LOT ACCESS SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE: 1"=100' 00 NO cl- 0 z Q U Q w Q z w I N N O N N C 811 PM 28617 PMB 201180-83 APN: 766-020-008 INDIO 40 INVESTMENT cA ` �;A APN: 766-100-003 \ USA \ \ u JEFFERSON STREET ROADWAY — EASEMENT TO BE GRANTED BY THE BLM rn w V) L5 d 0� cu I N N 0 N N c d N O �7 W v, W LL 0 Z M 0 0 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM -4-- Z M 0 Q LL 0 APN: 766-110-001 RICWD MDER iU 30' OFF -SITE SLOPE EASEMENT APN: 766-110-002 7RAVER17NE CORP APN: 766-110-018 USA \ N89'39'14"E 1285.48' i APN: 766-080-003 USA OFF -SITE SLOPE EASEMENT LOT "H" \ 00 — R \ N / (PRIVATE STREET) 3.00 AC \ / LOT 'AA' /" ''' , \'�°�, R�3j�' \ ( OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) zp, 5.19 AC LOT 'BB' — — — — \ "' ( OPEN SPACE �9 208' \ Lo 0469' /SLOPE) 1.60 AC30. \ \ 6= / (PUBLIC STREET) OFF -SITE SLOPE \ 17.12 AC EASEMENTul o � Lq rN AVENUE 60 2 N i° �N2 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) N Z4.98 AC � r\ � LOT 'CC' \ \ (OPEN SPACEK (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) ` /SLOPE) S� 0)\ 1.24 AC d' s SEE SHEET M-09 APN: 766-110-018 USA A7 20' S 33, T6S, WE, SBM APN: 766-110-006 WILLARD KELSEY N89'39'14"E 389.91' p 0 LOT 'AA' M "' o O N O (OPEN SPACE 04 0 0 O I /SLOPE) o o z 5.19 AC Z N89-39'14"E 400.01' 20' 7 8 r 20' TO BE QUITCLAIMED OR co I M \ LOT X" \ \ (OPEN SPACE/RECREACTION) Z LOT 'DD' \ \ 18.37 AC (OPEN SPACE I /SLOPE) 0.60 AC ` A APN: 766-110-008 WILLARD KELSEY LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE -- RIGHT OF WAY - - - - — LOTLINE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE LOT ACCESS SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE: 1"=100' r- 00 r7 ui O z d Q U a a z Li I N N Cl N N C v 812 APN: 766-100-003 US4 L5 P2 d Lf 05 I N N 0 (U N d N O A 6'. I LOT 'CC' I (OPEN SPACE 1.24 AC /, 110' �I rn Lq N r2 w N LOT 'EE' N (SLOPE) 1.68 AC z 0 00 N Lo w z N 04 N O 0 z 84' 30' 42' 42' OR im 00 W� 001 0 of 0 z IN THE CITY OF LA QUIN TA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM SEE SHEET M-08 Ifir, \�j \s b: J I s s LOT 'BB' o�rTi s �� \ LOT 'AA' I APN.WIIl766 KELSEY 8 (OPEN SPACE 2 1 /SLOPE) (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 0.60 AC 8 20 (OPEN SPACE 1.60 AC 4.98 AC i /SLOPE) (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) =3� 5.19 AC 3.75 AC - - - N89'42'51 "E 526.59'- - I� _ �34'� ` LOT "H" - - STREET 'J' , 486' R50' -2`'105 �� (PRIVATE STREET) 9 �� pp, 3.00 AC co ) R=280' - 7 8 I 20' N89'39'14"E 1016.71' LOT K - - - - N o� \ o I (OPEN SPACE/RECREACTION) 11 18.37 AC LOT In LOT 11" (OPEN SPACE (PRIVATE STREET) I LOT 'AA'R\1�0, 11 /SLOPE) 0.84 AC ( OPEN SPACE 0.92 AC I /SLOPE) 5.19 AC s,. (PUBLIC STREET) ' I 17.12 AC � I LOT "V" (PRIVATE DRIVE) 0.22 AC _ 202' 141' 60' I gg' NAP Lo I tog, APN: 766-110-005 MARIA J ALLGOOD o No z I to I 32' LOT 'FF' (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) 11.27 AC (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 14.32 AC I I \ N N89'46' 13"E 1017.53' LOT 'FF' ( OPEN SPACE \ ass • \ /SLOPE) \ - 11.27 �_cn - 199' - AC \ L 1g 199" �® 16300 - U N N 21g' - \ a w 136' - E _ 787' - 223- 214 9 • �� ._ T - 438' 334 h 38' `y \ LOT 'II' \ \ ( OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) ` 2.23 AC c''� 7; o I I h N 4 6 \ (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) / \ \ 12.96 AC LOT 'GG' (OPEN SPACE LOT "G"I 9.111 AC / (PRIVATE STREET) \ / 1.48 AC \ \ / MI / Iw I 5 I w 1-70' - \ s'Q_\ 6 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) I 15.66 AC 0I \ (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) (OPEN SPACE KK � \ / 24.69 AC /SLOPE ) 0.90 AC I I 42 (PUBLIC STREET) / TO BE QUITCLAIMED I 2 AC LOT 'FF' I 20� . (OPEN/SLOPE )CE \ sO 11.25 AC / LOT 'HH' (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) 16.20 AC to Lo N M co co a, APN: 766-110-015 i� CVWD O of O z 304, PARCEL 7A Lo o I Q J w U a N LOT 'JJ' (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) 1.68 AC to o M O i APN: 766-120-004 0 CVW0 W o wz 2 ib co w ♦w♦^^ v, f o� o � LOT 'LL (OPEN SPACE M i i� (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) �9S I 7.56 AC LOT 'MM'- (OPEN SPACE 1.76 AC I I / /SLOPE) 0.76 AC ' N ;; N' I 11 \ \ �o of T (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL \ \ DEVELOPMENT) \ / / 21.37 AC SEE SHEET M-10 LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE RIGHT OF WAY LOTLINE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE LOT ACCESS SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE: 1"=100' 07 0 z tl Q U a w a z I LLJ N O N N C v 813 L5 P2 d CU I N N 0 N N C d N O �7 w rn '000 o o z N89'51'46"W/, 30.00, W I Cal H W Z 5 M: 0 LL 0 J LL I� Z O" 0 U UI I LOT 'GG' (OPEN SPACE I /SLOPE) 9.11 AC I I APN. 766-100-003 US4 4 31 I I I.L,I r 00 0 0 o I z I I I f I � 4 � I r c� C W W v, N89'47'50"E _199.63 W VWW - , / LOT 'YY" (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) 3.19 AC TO /- Z _i�d TOE BE QUITCLAIMED 36 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 1.65 AC IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TFNTATI\/F TRAC:T MAP NCB `,17fIR7 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM SEE SHEET -09 1 --\ \ \ 489' 26 LOT KK R-so � 43' ( OPEN SPACE / / R=465' L= o) \�� Ste, \ 5 /SLOPE) // 's � \ \`s AC 1C \ ss- LOT a FFs (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 0.90 \ ( SLOPE) 24.69 11.25 AC AC 1000, LOT "C" s o / \ \ �t` / / (PRIVATE STREET) 7 5.42 AC I \ 5 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 75 / 1 / 6�S0 I 7.56 AC 57 I ' \ / o 1 LOT 'MM' I (OPEN SPACE rn ` /SLOPE) c° `/ 1.76 AC �a`O ^h 10 I LOT 'HH' I ( OPEN SPACE 5 /SLOPE) 16.20 AC N � 232 \ o a� \56 / �/ 0 6 LOT 'B' (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) �`rs\ (PRIVATE STREET) 15.66 AC \ 9.62 AC I I I \ I \ \ R a 64' LOT 'NN' (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) 1 _ F;A Ar \ Nip 85 • LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE ( - CENTERLINE �� 11 SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL -- RIGHT OF WAY DEVELOPMENT) 21.37 AC _ _ _ _ _ _ LOTLINE \\ EASEMENT LOT 'LL PARCEL LINE (OPEN /SLOPE)CE Ali LOT ACCESS 0.76 AC SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES �3 A PROPOSED 30' WIDE EASEMENT FOR ACCESS PURPOSES. 16 \ / TO BE QUITCLAIMED R=125 N !` 9 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 16.92 AC STREET) / 2 AC \ / / LOT 200' 10, (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) 3.59 AC \ \ \ LOT 'W / \ \ \ (OPEN SPACE CE / \ 2.87 AC / 'ozool / 0000 O s9 W Q \ \ (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) �\ \ / 6.09 AC o A \ / �'9 \ LOT 'OQ' 1 3S 35, (OPEN SPACE 00 / /SLOPE) o- / / 4.33 AC tiry TO BE QUITCLAIMED / / o / ✓ M / 1 0 05 f -AVENUE 62 �� 01 g63' -"-7' 1 33 g1 �1 I (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 3.74 AC I•" LOT 'UU' \ ( OPEN SPACE LOT 'TT' /SLOPE) (OPEN SPACE/ 34 1.13 AC � rn� SLOPE/TRAIL) (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) K'I 6.11 AC w 8.39 AC II \ "o N \ / / / / \ \ / / ' 10 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) / 13.79 AC LOT 'W' \`o TO BE QUITCLAIMED (OPEN SPACE \ /SLOPE) 2.87 AC LOT 'RR' \ ��� �s LOT 'PP' / (OPEN SPACE ���• �``> \ (OPEN SPACE / �`� ��r. \ /SLOPE ) � 1.99 C \ °rr- \ 2.03 AC \ 32 \ �j• (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) \ \ \ 6.90 AC \ LOT 'SS' \ \ \ \ 9,• LOT limpI Cl)/\ \ (/SLOPE )CE (OPEN SPACE I I 2.83 AC /SLOPE) 1.57 AC I N 122' c5b \ \ \ I � \ SEE SHEET M-11 N IT U no VW v 1�1 100 50 0 100 200 300 LOT AC"° ' 29 SCALE: 1"=100' (PRIVATE STREET) 5.42 AC / PREPARED BY: h Cam/ n +o 13 PROACTIVE (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS DEVELOPMENT) Qca30.37 AC 27042 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 110 Foothill Ranch, CA 92610 (949) 716-7460 ;1 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. STATE OF CALIFORNIA 00 0 z d Q U a w a z Uj I N N O N N C v 814 IN THE CITY OF LA QUIN TA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA rn w V) �7 � � o rn N 35, 35, h 36 5 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL RE ESIDENTIAL EVEL PMENT) DEVELOPMENT) 1.65 AC II 1.1� AC LOT 'XX' 34 .901 / ( OPEN SPACE (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL /SLOPE) I� 1.57 AC U TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM SEE SHEET M-10 (OPEN SPACE /SLOPE) \ LOT 'RR' ✓ 7.11 AC \ \ (OPEN SPACE OPE SJ FFF�\ /\ \ 11.99 AC (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) \ ��� / �N LOT 'TT' �� , s.so AC h LOT 'AF' F 890• n (OPEN SPACE (OPEN SPACE/ LOT 'SS' \ o /SLOPE) w° SLOPE/TRAIL) \ ��• 2.71 AC 6.11 AC (SLOPE) co \ \ 2.83 AC - \ J /c, \ I m - o z o s 290 ' LOT 11 BI, co / , 3s. / (PU 4 W fN I \ / /,C 1 i. i s .w. 0 0 o \ \ (PRIVATE STREET) \ J - 1*62 AC 18 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT)LOT 'B� 8.70 AC / (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL / (�RIVATE STREET) Ii�l / DEVELOPMENT) 9.62 AC N N \ /32 LOT 'ZZ' c , (OPEN SPACE � o 1 /SLOPE) C10) I N 16 \ \ 7l L�I 2.26 AC \ / � 3s LOT D 6 (PRIVATE STREET) N \ 4.31 AC N I I I LOT 'AE' 336' - - - (OPEN SPACE/ I �.� SLOPE) - - - 7.35 AC �. `� � , -sue LOT 'AJ' � , CA LOT 'AC'/()T 139 °' - - 79' o �/ (OPEN SPACE 0 8i (OPEN SPACE/ 1 30� �� 9 �k5 / / 231 101' 2S17�AC 3• �o 0 \ 11 SLOPE/TRAIL)C11 / _ _ 49 / \ \ 1 �w 28 81 (FUTURE P K/� 6\ �7'29•�5818E'rnorto ��`OPEN SPA(' I r? �6 �� L$ -1- l,,1.34AC ) \ 20'30 1 Ft%n5 221 05 159'-(FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) �•� ( OPEN SPACE/ 1.48 AC o \ \ / 29 SLOPE) 1 125 35' 1 1.14 AC r^ �10 Oo s. / (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 1.94 AC �� ems. �A 19 .SS Oto sA� LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE -- RIGHT OF WAY - - - LOTLINE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE LOT ACCESS SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES �1 A PROPOSED 10' WIDE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. �3 A PROPOSED 30' WIDE EASEMENT FOR ACCESS PURPOSES. ❑4 A PROPOSED 60' WIDE EASEMENT FOR ACCESS PURPOSES. �5 A PROPOSED EASEMENT FOR ACCESS AND WATER PURPOSES. 0 A PROPOSED EASEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL AND POWER PURPOSES. �7 A PROPOSED 10' WIDE EASEMENT FOR TRAIL PURPOSES. O� `I - �\ 1 1 DEVELOPMENT) \ o `� 'c" . ° 1 (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL W \ I LOT 'B' �, �� I 1 W \ 26 d 1(�/ (PRIVATE STREET) ` 15 R=465 / \ ♦_♦^ (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL \ 9.62 AC 'Ii ,� 21 -' 3�9 v, DEVELOPMENT) i 39, R=1485 L=295 90 LA .P W 3.54 AC `• 288' W \ 123' = - - R=1450' L=L-281_ � I 21 � 1 142'A A _R=1415' I * * (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 1 Lo \ �N BEET 100' 167 - 2 69' 2s �� 22 LOT AI 10.71 AC q, 6, gyp_ (OPEN SPACE fa 11g 4 30 JI I^`� (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) \ /SLOPE) 7.28 AC 4.73 AC 1 TO BE QUITCLAIMED I \ 1 \ 4 30 135' 2j 1� I 23 I o 1 W \TO E� QUITCLAIMED w A LOT 'AY' (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL I W \ F / LOOT SPACE A0 (OPEN SPACE MI DEVELOPMENT) (OPEN I I N 1 TW 1 /SLOPE) /SLOPE) LOT T 3 3 AC 5 0.46 AC 0 E RELOCATED 11 I 0.21 AC N N 1 1 \ z - W in I `� 30' 30' �' 1 1 (OPEN SPACE LOT 'AG' 1 W /RECREATION) \ ; °' ( OPEN SPACE I 60' I 5.53 AC \ \ 25 co /SLOPE) I LOT 'AH' \ � � �\ (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) `� 1 .71 AC 24 (OPEN SPACE o o\ \ 2.30 AC M (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) I /SLOPE) o 3.55 AC 3.46 AC06���\ �2 I I o � 0 co 100 \ \ o Ste• ^ � - /�� I 9 9 17' �, LOT E _ ` (PRIVATE STREET) \ 2 4 AC 43�I-_ 67 a-- -j- -- - - Ra>J0, 8�- 330' L=718' CDR800�`356`LL=712' M R=3300- _ / 183' -513 / \ R\830, L,36g. - - 1 17' Iss, STREET AEA R=3270' L=705' \ \ 3S9' L`383' 142' 48' / �2. 705' 183' \ \ 26 STREET AFA -2°1 R 280' L-- 249' - 20 \ (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) 2 R=2 R 3 \ 254' - (FUTURE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) LOT R 142 L� LOT D \ 3.54 AC 37 Rc L=291 A 9.74 AC 376' � � / �7 3¢0' C,3p8, (ACCESS/WATER FACILITIES) 308' (PRIVATE STREET) (OPEN SPACE/RECREATION) 5.57 AC 0 8.58 AC 682' 183' \ \ \ I I^ 4.31 AC 146' 310' 54 132' 117 74 32' 37' LOT 'AB' _ - - ��,'s• , 122 112' 182' \ ( OPEN SPACE 1 154' N \ 40' 98, 48 403' 249 190' 54' OS88 AC COACHELLA VALLEY 1 27 27' Lo 29 r 137' 128' 119, 3a' \�8, PUBLIC ACCESS TRAIL SUBJECT TO MULTI -SPECIES HABITAT 19, 74' LOT AM" OF LA"MEAff QUMA APPROVAL THE CITY LOT BOA CONSERVATION LINE 1 11 ' LOT 'AK' 151 COACHELLA VALLEY (OPEN SPACE MULTI -SPECIES HABITAT (OPEN SPACE) (OPEN SPACE ��11 /SLOPE) CONSERVATION LINE 113.06 AC /RESTRICTED) LOT "S" 3.68 AC 36.99 AC \ ^ (OPEN SPACE/RECREATION) o ,n 3.11 AC o I^ I � I � SEE SHEET M-12 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE: 1"=100' r- 00 0 z d Q U a w a Z Li I N N Cl N N C v 815 L5 3 00 I N N 0 N N d N O W7 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM SEE SHEET M-11 3 5 TO BE RELOCATED 15' LOT "S" 11 APN: 753-040-017 (OPEN SPACE/RECREATION) 11 AC 37 11?AVERITNE CORP 3..0 N 54'' N (ACCESS/WATER FACILITIES) 8.58 AC 27' 27' LO LOT R (OPEN SPACE/RECREATION) 5.56 AC M TO BE QUITCLAIMED APN. 753-050-029 TRAVERTINE CORP A TO BE QUITCLAIMED 10 r W .8A; W� \ cl) 37 W (ACCESS/WATER ACACILITIES) vJ PROPOSED WATER TANK rn LOT "0" (OPEN SPACE /RESTRICTED 36.99 AC LOT "M" (OPEN SPACE) 113.06 AC 4)g, 121• 184' LOT "N" APN. 753-060-003 TRAVERTINE CORP (OPEN SPACE/RECREATION) \ 22.64 AC 1- COACHELLA VALLEY MULTI -SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION LINE 258' 229' 134 171' m 17\ N`1$ \S9' LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE -- RIGHT OF WAY — - - - - — LOTLINE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE LOT ACCESS SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES N86-1 666.15' Zq.B p8' N� 415,1g E a ^'UPF' SO, 0 LOT " P" (OPEN SPACE/RESTRICTED) 56.00 AC W '2'^ vJ W '^ r�V IA '�� N89'S126 '37"E 7.31' �— 30' ' 39 q.1 N7 ZA, 30' �•50 / aka 100 50 0 100 200 300 N89'56'16"W 1397.48' MARTINEZ ROCK SLIDE APN: 753-060-004 USA SCALE: 1"=100' PREPARED BY: PROACTIVE Z ENGINEERING CONSULTANTS 27042 Towne Centre Drive, Suite 110 Foothill Ranch, CA 92610 (949) 716-7460 t IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF 13'37 16 E 38.37 nivrnc'rrnr crerr nr nei irnnkue APN. 753-050-007 11Z4VERITNE CORP 4 00 r7 LLJ 0 z Q U a F- a Z LJ I N N O N N C v 816 IN THE CITY OF LA QUIN TA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA T s dd F u u u u a rn w V) L5 P2 d N I N N 0 N N c d a, O �7 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM S59 T7S, WE, SBM APN: 753-040-009 SHENG PU LEE & CHIN LAND LEE APN: 753-040-010 CALIFORNIA FISH & GAME WILDLIFE CONSERVATION APN: 753-040-011 CURTIS WONG & LILLIAN WONG APN: 753-040-022 CALIFORNIA FISH & GAME WILDLIFE CONSERVATION N00'21'09"E 651.67' LOT "T" I (OPEN SPACE z /RECREATION) LEGEND BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE -- RIGHT OF WAY — - - - - — LOTLINE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE <==> LOT ACCESS SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES 30' �1 A PROPOSED 10' WIDE EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. �3 A PROPOSED 30' WIDE EASEMENT FOR ACCESS PURPOSES. �4 A PROPOSED 60' WIDE EASEMENT FOR ACCESS PURPOSES. �5 A PROPOSED EASEMENT FOR ACCESS AND WATER PURPOSES. ❑6 A PROPOSED EASEMENT FOR ELECTRICAL AND POWER PURPOSES. �7 A PROPOSED 10' WIDE EASEMENT FOR TRAIL PURPOSES. 001 LOT "ABA AC (OPEN SPACE co o /SLOPE) APN: 753-040-013 m 0.88 AC / �` m DOUGLAS KIM & HAE KYUNG KIM APN: 766-100-003 USA APN: 753-040-014 CA rn �w / 'L TRAVERTINE CORP �+ 0) '� \ 27 30' m (FUTURE PARK/ OPEN SPACE) N00'04'28"E 651.83' A4 30' I � \ s z i LOT %Bw LOT yr 00 / PRIVATE STREET \ (OPEN SPACE bD Ln 124' ( �� \ /SLOPE) _ o 9.62 AC 6 3.19 AC = �ppAp S \ NO'08'14"E 1451.99' LOT R / i y / ,�� 13 ` \479 , 2 \ / (OPEN SPACE/RECREATION) // 0 w / �� `' / 28 \ 57 , / F / 5.56 AC LOT AAO" ` 0 0° �;'g /6 (FUTURE PARK/ g0? 4 6) O' M / w '`' o o OPEN SPACE) w (OPEN SPACE m - o � N — /SLOPE) p 6``�' 6'lO 1.34 AC 8g 0.23 AC O / O 35 10 / "000R' �,421.57 61 g �377.96' _ S�F 82 9 / LOT AZZ" N dL (FUTURE UDEVELOPMENT) RESIDENTIAL LOT AC (OPEN SPACE/ o \ �1.1\AC 356 Ste\ A \�A 1p \11110 SEE SHEET M-12 APN: 753-040-015 CALIFORNIA FISH & GAME WILDLIFE CONSERVATION N00'04'28"E 659.10' (OPEN SPACE/ SLOPE) 65' SLOPE) 2.26 AC 2.39 AC SEE SHEET M-11 LOT AXXA 162' SEE SHEET M-10 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE: 1"=100' r- 00 uj z d Q U a a Z uj I N N Co N N C v 817 I 30' I L_5 3 d O� N 00 I N N 0 N N c d N O �7 APN: 753-050-014 MARC AVRIETTE & LESLIE AVRIETTE APN: 753-050-013 TRAVERTINE CORP APN: 753-060-004 USA IN THE CITY OF LA QUIN TA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM LEGEND — — BOUNDARY LINE — CENTERLINE APN: 753-040-009 SHENG PU LEE & SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE CHIN LAND LEE -- RIGHT OF WAY - - - - — LOTLINE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE APN: 753-050-024 RICHARD JOBE & LISA JOBE I 15 MARTINEZ ROCK SLIDE APN: 753-050-008 WILLARD KELSEY h N00'12'10"W N 13*37' 16"E \ 38.37' z 00 IR (P 0 O) w O APN: 753-050-017 CALIFORNIA FISH & GAME WILDLIFE CONSERVATION PR01 37 I -ER 1 8 AC LOT "P (OPEN SPACE/RESTRI( 56.00 AC S47 T7S, R7E, SBM KI(1l1-Fd '7i C- I 1 Z, A 0n, o� 97' SEE SHEET M-12 APN: 753-050-028 EMILIO CARL MELILLO LOT "0" 'EN SPACE/RESTRICTED) 36.99 AC APN: 753-040-010 CALIFORNIA FISH & GAME WILDLIFE CONSERVATION APN: 753-040-011 CURTIS WONG & LILL14N WONG z 00 co cn N N rri APN: 753-040-023 FRIENDS OF THE DESERT MOINTAIN N00'21 '08"E- 656.51 ' 15' 6 15'- APN: 753-040-016 TRAVERTINE CORP APN: 753-040-017 TRAVERTINE CORP —�I 15' <*==> LOT ACCESS SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES cr C w w r2 V♦ w rwn V♦ 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE: 1"=100' 00 r'> ui r7 0 z d Q U a a H z Li I N N Cl N N C v 818 W V) L5 d 0 M I N N 0 N N c d N O �7 MADISON STREET V TO BE QUITCLAIMEI LOT "AU" (OPEN SPACE /BASIN) 6.27 AC S03°03'00"E 25.26' 4 30' 53 30' To 00 cD o � o � N LOT "APB z (OPEN SPACE o /SLOPE) 0 2.59 AC S27°28'20'E 54.03' --842'��04_'S00° 12' 10"E 30.00' w ' 0' L=97' N89°47'50"E A W = R 145' N89°47'50"E 2110' 1 — w, w EX R/W N LOT "AV" (OPEN SPACE) 1.56 AC �33 LOT "L" (OPEN SPACE /BASIN) 20.69 AC 019 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 37387 PORTION OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST AND SECTIONS 4 AND 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SBM LEGEND APN: 766-280-062 \ CVWD \ APN: 766-280-007 CVWD \ EX. R/W \ CD M AVENUE 62 CD I 1 APN: 753-070-010 \ USA APN: 753-070-012 USA 1 0 1 0 0 r\ 0 1 APN: 764-280-056 CITY 1 OF = LA OUINTA a � c - w _ O Q w I APN: 753-070-017 rw ❑ I APN: 753-070-027 V♦ I I I I I I i i I I I i R COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AVENUE 62 _ N89°47'44"E 2639.51' APN: 764-280-027 APN: 753-070-031 APN: 764-280-028 APN: 753-070-018 APN: 764-280-054 CITY OF LA OUINTA COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TR 30023-1 MB 329/87-102 APN: 764-280-054 1\ APN: 753-070-028 APN: 764-280-030 I APN: 764-300-004 BOUNDARY LINE CENTERLINE SECTION LINE/ QUARTER SECTION LINE RIGHT OF WAY LOTLINE EASEMENT PARCEL LINE LOT ACCESS SEE SHEET M-02 FOR THE EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE: 1"=100' r- 00 ui z d Q U a Q Z Li I N N Cl N N C v 819 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX EXHIBIT F DRAFT TRAVERTINE PROJECT EXEMPTION FINDINGS FROM GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66300 REQUIREMENTS The City of La Quinta City Council does hereby find and determine as follows: 1. Government Code Section 66300(e)(3)(D), formerly 66300(h)(1), provides that the requirements of Section 66300, et seq. that constrain the authority of the City of La Quinta ("City") to lower the residential dwelling unit density and intensity of use of real property through General Plan, zoning and other entitlement amendments do not supersede limit or otherwise modify the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) ("CEQA"). 2. The requirements of CEQA apply to "discretionary projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies, including, but not limited to, the enactment and amendment of zoning ordinances, the issuance of zoning variances, the issuance of conditional use permits and the approval of tentative subdivision maps ...." (Pub Res. Code § 21080.) 3. The environmental impact report certified by the La Quinta City Council on June 6, 1995 for the Travertine Specific Plan (State Clearing House No. 94112047) (1995 EIR") and the Travertine Specific Plan (1995 Specific Plan") approvals contemplated a maximum development of 2,300 residential dwelling units; however, the 1995 EIR and 1995 Specific Plan included many mitigation measures and conditions of approval that required additional environmental analyses before issuance of various federal, state and City permits and other approvals. The findings and conclusions of these additional environmental analyses have adversely impacted the amount of developable land and hence the number of residential dwelling units that can be developed within the 1995 Specific Plan area, as further discussed below. 4. Inasmuch as satisfaction of and compliance with the 1995 EIR mitigation measures and 1995 Specific Plan conditions of approval required extensive additional environmental analyses, the 1995 EIR is a de facto program environmental impact report that requires follow-on CEQA compliance in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c). 5. The 1995 EIR mitigation measures, 1995 Specific Plan conditions of approval, in addition to other applicable species and habitat conservation plans approved after 60133402.v1 820 DRAFT certification of the 1995 EIR and approval of the 1995 Specific Plan requiring extensive further environmental analysis in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c) include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Hydrology and Drainage. 1995 EIR mitigation measure 3.7.2 requires the design and construction of storm water works including "Detention basins, and other storm water protective works [that] shall be constructed to protect structures from 100-year flooding." Such storm water works must meet the requirements of the Coachella Valley Water District ("CVWD") and the City's Public Works Department. 1. To comply with 1995 EIR mitigation measure 3.7.2, a Drainage Master Plan was prepared, in 20201 in accordance with CVWD, City Public Works Department and United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (for potential flood impacts to Dike No. 4, which did not exist in 1995 and is under the jurisdiction of the United States Bureau of Reclamation) requirements, taking into consideration the potential dynamic hydraulic, sedimentation and erosion conditions present at the 1995 Specific Plan site. The 2020 Drainage Master Plan is included in the administrative record of proceedings for certification of the environmental impact report required to satisfy CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), as discussed in Section 4 above (State Clearinghouse No. 2018011023) ("2021 EIR") for a General Plan amendment, specific plan amendment, tentative tract map and development agreement ("Revised Land Use Entitlements"). 2. The 2020 Drainage Master Plan identified project related impacts to the existing hydrologic and flood control features that affect the 1995 Specific Plan area and regional flood control and local drainage improvements required for development of the 1995 Specific Plan and to satisfy the 1995 EIR Mitigation Measures. 3. Implementation of the 1995 EIR Mitigation Measures, BO and other environmental requirements, as well as 2020 Drainage Master Plan will consume 394 acres of developable land as identified in 1995 Specific Plan area as depicted on Exhibit "A" hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, resulting in a reduction of 1012 residential units that can be developed. These acreage and unit reductions are detailed further below. B. Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. 1995 EIR mitigation measure 3.8.3 and Specific Plan condition of approval 15 require an assessment of impacts to the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep and habitat associated with development of the 1995 Specific Plan area. 1. In June, 2004, in order to comply with 1995 EIR mitigation measure 3.8.3 and 1995 Specific Plan condition of approval 15, the owner of the Travertine Specific Plan area submitted a request to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("USFWS") to initiate a 60133402.v1 821 EXHIBIT A Current Boundar 1 Devil Canyon Development Footprint 508.2 AC .i f �t1 r r I i RPA with 200' Buffer 1 � 1 Middle North Canyon I1 " MiddleSouthSouth Canyon al L Na 1 `ak t Species Habitat/Critical Habitat Boundary (USFWS) 1 `6 r _ 1 Proposed Basins �I 1 1 i gtrpamhprl A Habitat - 1 Cultural Resources Restricted Open Space 1 NORTH 1—_--i This exhibit summarized the various elements that have shaped the current development footprint and supports the current entitlement effect of 1,200 DU. 822 DRAFT Section 7 consultation process to assess the potential impacts to the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep and habitat resulting from development of the Specific Plan area. 2. The Section 7 consultation process resulted in approval of a Biological Opinion by the USFWS (FWS-ERIV-2735.3) ("BO") after consultation with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the Bureau of Reclamation on December 7, 2005. The BO is included in the administrative record of proceedings for approval of the Revised Land Use Entitlements. 3. The BO concluded that a proposed reduction in the 1995 Specific Plan area plus the addition of critical habitat required to mitigate against impacts to the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep as depicted on Exhibit "B" hereto and by this reference made a part hereof and explained above. C. Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan. In September and October, 2008, the state and federal governments, respectively, approved the Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("CVMSHCP") to address impacts to certain species and their habitat resulting from development. Compliance with the CVMSHCP substitutes, in part, for CEQA compliance for assessments of impacts to each individual species covered by the CVMSHCP and is mandatory. 1. Compliance with the CVMSHCP requires that no development will be permitted within the San Jacinto Mountains Conservation area. The CVMSHCP is included by reference in the administrative record of proceedings for approval of the Revised Land Use Entitlements. 2. The 1995 Specific Plan included area that encroaches into the San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area that must now be left undisturbed and preserved in perpetuity in compliance with the CVMSHCP. 3. Removing affected development areas of the 1995 Specific Plan area from the San Jacinto Mountains Conservation area as depicted on Exhibit "C" hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, resulted in a reduction of Specific Plan area as described above. D. Jurisdictional Waters and Desert Dry Wash Riparian Woodland Habitat. Desert Dry Wash Riparian Woodland Habitat. The south end of the Specific Plan area contains a concentration of desert dry wash riparian woodland habitat that present within a number of ephemeral drainage courses flowing from mountains to the west and south. 1. Preservation of a significant portion of the desert dry wash riparian woodland habitat is necessary in order to provide nesting sites for a number of species of birds and habitat for terrestrial animals. 60133402.v1 823 EXHIBIT B Figure 1. Proposed Travertine Project J��"7 Development and Conservation Boundaries "'- 4 - 4fJ Fk:Mi FVLLL1Fi EfRti'FCE .71Proposed deVelogfrFeilt auzsx.rks �44 7 - - UtC F4**m ls+rp Ras] '�i.• _ W " - ProposedoxLgervabon Gar,na].PAWLea9n" Proposed acquL.,i rl area for addrtional t ''' xT - _ 6a C+r�43.Y Prtr 3ortr��n �.tx►servabon of apprommat* 100 acres [! r,+acam: CecMfflbff x ='Z + t�- _ Peninsular bigham sheep k•ne ow Qw Mft• bU %.[L3 x . � cnucal ha,aAta: - - 0 5C0 1,00D Feet R� JIL • Y _ , - y Y - ti iT � N. •�. EXHIBIT C 825 DRAFT 2. The 2021 EIR requires preservation of 55.98 acres of desert dry wash riparian woodland habitat as depicted on Exhibit "D" hereto and by this reference made a part hereof as a mitigation against loss of some of the habitat that will occur from development of the remainder of the Specific Plan area, resulting in a further reduction of 140 residential units that can be developed. 6. As a result of compliance with CEQA, the number of residential dwelling units that can be developed within the Specific Plan area has been reduced from 2,300 to 1,200. 60133402.v1 826 EXHIBIT D 33.612921 -116.272715 F'S w l ( SEE INSET MAP - .l-\- P11 '- -- - �-- � l" - - -- --------- _ P14 � _ P12 1r /*-P17 -•/�-- • ` - P1fi Regional Board Non -Wetland Waters & CDFW Jurisdictional Streambed (90.96 acres) CDFW Desert Dry Wash Woodland Habitat (55.98 acres) 827 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX EXHIBIT G CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 Page 1 of 23 GENERAL The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Within 30 days of the approval of Specific Plan 2017-0004, the applicant shall provide the City with a final Specific Plan document in PDF format, with all redlines converted to final text. 3. Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM 37387), and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code (LQMC) can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.laquintaca.gov. 4. Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM 37387) shall be subject to the same term length as Development Agreement 2021-0001, pursuant to Government Code Section 66452.6 (a)(1). 5. Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM 37387) shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approval(s): EA2017-0008 GPA2017-0002 ZC2017-0002 SP2017-0004 DA2021-0001 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 6. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: 828 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 2 OF 23 • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Development Services Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design and Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above -listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. 7. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 8. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permittee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. 829 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 3 OF 23 The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The inclusion in the Homeowners' Association (HOA) Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required by these Conditions of Approval and all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures of the approvals identified in Condition of Approval 5 of these Conditions of Approval and the applicant shall execute and record an agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required. 9. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or 830 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 4 OF 23 instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 10. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 11. Prior to issuance of any grading or building permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development from other jurisdictions or other agencies. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned requirements in the CC&Rs for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. 12. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition (PROPERTY RIGHTS; Condition of Approval 11), conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 13. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street right-of- way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 14. The public street right-of-way offers fordedication required forthis development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Modified Secondary Arterial) — 84 feet ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 831 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 5 OF 23 2) Avenue 62 (Non -conforming Modified Secondary Arterial) — Varies 40' to 50' ROW from the centerline of Avenue 62 for a total 60 to 80 feet ultimate developed right of way except additional variable right of way dedication to accommodate improvements conditioned under STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS. 15. The applicant shall acquire easement(s), license(s), and/or permit(s) from the County of Riverside, and/or the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and/or the Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) for the portions of Jefferson Street and Avenue 62 that extend into BLM, BOR, and/or County of Riverside's jurisdiction as shown on the tentative tract map prior to improvement plan approval. 16. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street rights - of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 17. The private street rights -of -way to be retained for private use required for this development include: B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Private residential streets measured gutter flow line to gutter flow line shall have a 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side, and 28 feet if on -street parking is prohibited. The applicant shall establish provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 2) Madison Street (Emergency Vehicle Access) — Private Street measured at edge of pavement shall have 24 feet travel width with no parking allowed on either side. C. CUL DE SACS The cul de sac shall conform to the shape shown on the tentative map or as approved by the City Engineer. 18. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 832 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 6 OF 23 Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1" equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement. 19. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right- of-way shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights -of -way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 20. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot -wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 21. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 22. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights - of -way as follows: A. Jefferson Street - 10-foot from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 62 - 10-foot from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 23. Direct vehicular access to Jefferson Street, Avenue 62, and Madison Street is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Tentative Tract Map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded Final Map. 833 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 7 OF 23 24. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 25. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. 26. The applicant shall provide access to Assessor's Parcel Number 766-110-005 as shown on Tentative Tract Map 37387. 27. The applicant shall provide access to properties within Section 5 of Township 7 South, Range 7 East as shown on Tentative Tract Map 37387 and shall grant access easements over the private streets within the Travertine Development. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 28. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan and provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 29. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan and Specific Plan 2017-0004. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Jefferson Street (Modified Secondary Arterial) — 84' ROW Construct the street to its standard 42 feet from the centerline of Jefferson Street for a total 84-foot ultimate developed right of way and the requirements of these conditions. Phase 1 (Prior to 1 st Certificate of Occupancy) — Construct Jefferson Street from the east project boundary to the North Loop intersection. Phase 2 (Prior to 601 st Certificate of Occupancy) - Construct Jefferson Street from the North Loop intersection to Avenue 60. Other required improvements in the Jefferson Street right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: 834 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 8 OF 23 a) Guadalupe Crossing (60' ROW) measured at gutter flow line to gutter flow line shall have a 40-foot travel width. b) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. c) Bus turnout (if required by Sunline Transit) d) 8-foot wide bike lane (Class II Bicycle Path) e) 14-foot wide striped median in Phase 1 of construction. f) 6-foot wide sidewalk. If the sidewalk meanders, it shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave and convex curves with respect to the curb line that touches the back of curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet and at each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. 2) Construct roundabouts on Jefferson Street at the North Loop and at the South Loop with the North Loop and South Loop Collector facilities in Phase 1 (Prior to 1st Certificate of Occupancy). 3) Avenue 62 (Non -conforming Modified Secondary Arterial) — Varies 40' to 50' ROW from the centerline of Avenue 62. Construct in Phase 1 (Prior to 1 st Certificate of Occupancy) the street to its 40 to 50 feet from the centerline of Avenue 62 as shown on the tentative tract map and the requirements of these conditions. Other required improvements in the Avenue 62 right-of-way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: a) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b) 8-foot wide bike lane (Class II Bicycle Path) c) At Station 140+50 to 152+00, 6-foot wide striped median in Phase 1 of construction. At Station 152+00 to 191 +41, 6-foot wide striped median. 835 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 9 OF 23 d) At Station 140+50 to 160+00, 6-foot wide straight sidewalk. At Station 160+00 to 191-41, 6-foot wide sidewalk. If the sidewalk meanders, it shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave and convex curves with respect to the curb line that touches the back of curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet and at each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. 4) Madison Street (Emergency Vehicle Access) — Construct in Phase 1 (Prior to 1st Certificate of Occupancy) Private Street with 24 feet travel width measured at edge of pavement with no parking allowed on either side. 5) Applicant shall pay the fair -share for improvements and/or traffic signals per the percentages calculated in the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) prepared by Urban Crossroads. The amount of the applicant's fair share shall be as approved by the City Engineer. The applicant shall pay the fair share prior to grading permit issuance. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Private Residential Streets measured at gutter flow line to gutter flow line shall have a 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side, and 28 feet if on -street parking is prohibited, and provided there is adequate off- street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed by the Engineering and Design and Development Departments and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 30. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 31. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 836 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 10 OF 23 32. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings, and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. 33. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1 /8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 34. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Secondary Arterial 4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 35. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. FINAL MAPS 36. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 837 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 11 OF 23 37. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 38. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Mass Grading Plan 1" = 100' Horizontal B. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal D. Erosion Control Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal E. Hydrology Report (Plan submitted in Report Form) F. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through F to be submitted concurrently. G. Off -Site Street Improvements/ Signing & Striping 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical H. Off -Site Median Landscaping Plans 1" = 40' Horizontal On -Site Street Improvements/ Signing & Striping J. Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical 1" = 40' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. 838 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 12 OF 23 All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200-feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the City Engineer. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 39. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.laquintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 40. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. 41. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 42. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIX) guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 839 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 13 OF 23 43. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 44. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 45. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 46. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements including all flood control measures and Phase 1 of Jefferson Street and Avenue 62 conditioned in STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS prior to issuance of the 1st Certificate of Occupancy. Phase 2 of Jefferson Street and Avenue 62 conditioned in STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS shall be completed by the issuance of the 601 st Certificate of Occupancy. 47. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off - site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. 840 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 14 OF 23 Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. 48. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. GRADING 49. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 50. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 51. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, and B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a professional registered in the State of California, and C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. An Erosion Control Plan showing Best Management Practices prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls), E. A WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California, and F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. 841 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 15 OF 23 A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 52. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 53. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 54. This development shall comply with LQMC Chapter 8.11 (Flood Hazard Regulations). If any portion of any proposed building lot in the development is or may be located within a flood hazard area as identified on the City's Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the development shall be graded to ensure that all floors and exterior fill (at the foundation) are above the level of the project (100-year) flood and building pads are compacted to 95% Proctor Density as required in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 65.5(a) (6). Prior to issuance of building permits for lots which are so located, the applicant shall furnish elevation certifications, as required by FEMA, that the above conditions have been met. DRAINAGE 55. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for Tentative Tract Map 37387 Travertine or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 56. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — 842 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 16 OF 23 Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1 hour, 3 hour, 6 hour or 24 hour event producing the greatest total run off. 57. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 58. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 59. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin or as approved by the City Engineer. 60. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 61. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots unless approved by the City Engineer. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 62. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 63. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 64. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 843 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 17 OF 23 65. The applicant is hereby notified that future site modifications may be necessary including, but not limited to street reconfiguration. Verification of the proposed storm water facilities including retention system is subject to review and approval by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). If in the event, the proposed retention capacity or pass through storm water flow is found to be inadequate during final design, the applicant shall revise what is currently proposed in the preliminary hydrology study and drainage plan and make adjustments to the site layout as needed to accommodate the increased retention/detention or pass through capacity required to satisfy safety issues of the Public Works Department and CVWD. Pursuant to the aforementioned, the applicant may be required to construct additional underground and aboveground drainage facilities to convey on site and off site stormwater that historically flows onto and/or through the project site. 66. If permitted by CVWD, Bureau of Reclamation (BOR), and the City Engineer, the applicant's proposal to discharge storm water directly, or indirectly, to the area behind Dike No. 4 shall require the applicant to execute an indemnification instrument as approved by the City Engineer and City Attorney. Additionally, the applicant shall pay for all costs of sampling and testing associated with the development's drainage discharge which may be required under the City's NPDES Permit or other City or area -wide pollution prevention program, and for any other obligations and/or expenses which may arise from such discharge. The applicant is required to construct required discharge treatment Best Management Practice facilities per the NPDES Permit but at a minimum shall install a CDS Unit or equal system as approved by the City Engineer. The indemnification shall be executed and furnished to the City prior to the issuance of any grading, construction or building permit, and shall be binding on all heirs, executors, administrators, assigns, and successors in interest in the land within this tentative tract map excepting therefrom those portions required to be dedicated or deeded for public use. If such discharge is approved for this development, the applicant shall make provisions for meeting these obligations. Additionally, the applicant shall submit verification to the City of BOR and CVWD acceptance of the proposed discharge of storm water directly, or indirectly, to the area behind Dike No. 4 prior to the issuance of any grading, construction or building permit. 67. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ. 844 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 18 OF 23 A. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. 68. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 69. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 70. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 71. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. 845 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 19 OF 23 CONSTRUCTION 72. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly - maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 73. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 74. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots. 75. All new landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 76. The applicant shall submit final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Director determines extenuating circumstances exist which justify an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. Prior to final approval of the installation of landscaping, the Landscape Architect of record shall provide the Design and Development Department a letter stating he/she has personally inspected the installation and that it conforms with the final landscaping plans as approved by the City. If staff determines during final landscaping inspection that adjustments are required in order to meet the intent of the City Council's approval, the Planning Manager shall review and approve any such revisions to the landscape plan. 846 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 20 OF 23 PUBLIC SERVICES 77. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as required by SunLine Transit Agency and as approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 78. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 79. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, common areas, perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. 80. The Applicant acknowledges that the City intends to form a Travertine Landscape and Lighting District and, by recording a subdivision map, agrees to be included in the District and to offer for dedication such easements as may be required for the maintenance and operation of related facilities. Any assessments will be done on a benefit basis, as required by law. 81. The Applicant shall make provisions for maintenance of all common areas, public landscape areas, and storm water retention areas within Tract Map No. 37387 via one or a combination of the following methods prior to final map approval: A. Applicant shall consent to the formation of a maintenance district under Chapter 26 of the Improvement Act of 1911 (Streets and Highways Code, Section 5820 et seq.) or the Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972 (Streets and Highways Code 22600 et seq.) to implement maintenance of all improved public landscape areas, landscape buffer, and storm water retention areas. It is understood and agreed that the Developer/Applicant shall pay all costs of maintenance for said improved common areas until such time as tax revenues are received from assessment of the real property. B. Applicant shall submit to the Design and Development Department a Management and Maintenance Agreement, to be entered into with the unit/lot owners of this land division, in order to insure all private common areas and facilities will be maintained. A homeowner's association or associations shall be created with the unqualified right to assess the owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs. The association shall have the right to lien the property of any owners who default in the payment of their assessments. 847 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 21 OF 23 FIRE 82. This project will require the construction, equipping and placing in service of a new fire station. In conjunction with the recordation of the Final Map, Developer shall record a covenant assuring the participation of each and every landowner in contributing its fair share of the cost of construction of a fire station to serve the project. The covenant shall be in a form acceptable to the City Attorney. This station will be located as specified by the Fire Department. Timing of construction or funding to be approved by the Fire Department and City Staff. 83. A water flow monitoring system and/or fire alarm system may be required and determined at time of building plan review. Ref. CFC 903.4, CFC 907.2 and NFPA 72. 84. Fire Apparatus Access Roads A. Street and Precise Grading improvements affecting Fire apparatus access shall be reviewed by Fire Department. B. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided to within 150 feet of all exterior portions of buildings, unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department. C. Fire Department Access - Fire apparatus access roads shall be designed, constructed and maintained to support the imposed loads of RVC fire apparatus with a total weight of 80,000 pounds. Apparatus weight is distributed as 55,000 pounds on tandem rear axles and 25,000 pounds on the front axle. D. Fire Department Access Turn Around - Dead-end fire apparatus access roads in excess of 150 feet in length shall be provided with a bulb turnaround at the terminus. Additional turnaround designs may be acceptable as approved by the Fire Department. Reference Riverside County Fire Department Guideline OFM-01A for details. E. Fire lane identification will be required when it is necessary to restrict parking of vehicles to maintain the required width of fire access roads for emergency vehicle use. Reference Guideline OFM-01A for the proper method of identifying the fire lane. F. All electronically operated driveway gates providing access to and from the tract shall be provided with Knox key switches and automatic sensors for emergency access. Manual gates shall be provided with approved Knox equipment. Ref. CFC 506.1. 848 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 22 OF 23 G. Buildings shall be provided with a Knox Box. The Knox Box shall be installed in an accessible location approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. H. Traffic calming devices shall be prohibited unless the design is reviewed and approved by the Office of the Fire Marshal. Ref. CFC 503.4.1. 85. Residential fire sprinklers are required in all one and two-family dwellings per the California Residential Code (CRC). Plans must be submitted to the Office of the Fire Marshal for review and approval prior to installation. Reference CRC 313.2. 86. All new commercial buildings and structures 3,600 square feet or larger shall be protected by a fire sprinkler system. Reference CFC 903.2 as amended by the County of Riverside. 87. Addressing - All residential dwellings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the residence. All commercial buildings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the address side and additional locations as required. Ref. CFC 505.1 and County of Riverside Office of the Fire Marshal Standard #07-01. 88. Fire Department Building Construction Permit Review - Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed when the Fire Department reviews these plans. These conditions will be based on California Fire Code, California Building Code (CBC), and related codes/standards adopted at the time of construction plan submittal. Reference CFC 105.1. 89. The required water system, including all fire hydrant(s), shall be installed, and accepted by the appropriate water agency (CVWD) and the Riverside County Fire Department prior to any combustible building material placed on an individual lot. Contact the Riverside County Fire Department to inspect the required fire flow, street signs, all weather surface, and all access and/or secondary access. Approved water plans must be at the job site. A. A phasing plan shall be approved by the Fire Department. Each phase shall provide approved access and water supply for fire protection prior to any construction. 90. Fire Hydrants and Fire Flow: The water system shall be capable of delivering the required fire flow. Fire hydrant location and spacing shall comply with the fire code. Plans for the water system shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. An approved water supply shall be installed and accepted by the Fire Department prior to the arrival of combustible materials on site. Reference 2022 California Fire Code (CFC) 507.5.1, 3312, Appendices B and C. 849 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2024-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET ADOPTED: AUGUST 6, 2024 PAGE 23 OF 23 A. Transportation Hydrants: Where new water mains are extended along streets where hydrants are not needed for protection of structures or similar fire problems, fire hydrants shall be provided at spacing not to exceed 1,000 feet to provide for transportation hazards. (CFC Table C102.1 ft nt c.) B. Fire hydrants and other Fire Protection Equipment shall be provided with a minimum 3-feet radius clearance around the circumference of the device. (CFC 507.5.5, 509.2.1 & 912.4.2). 91. The 601s' certificate of occupancy shall not be issued until Jefferson Street from Avenue 60 (the project boundary of the Travertine Development) to Avenue 58 is constructed. 92. The project development and details outlined and provided mitigations presented in the Fire Access Master Plan (Approved 9/22/2020) shall be complied with. FEES AND DEPOSITS 93. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 94. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 95. The applicant shall either dedicate land or pay an in -lieu fee for parks or recreational facilities in compliance with the provisions of Chapter 13.48 (Park Dedications (Quimby Act)) prior to recordation of Final Maps for future residential tracts. 850 ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE ZONING MAP TO MODIFY THE AREA AND LOCATIONS OF THE LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, TOURIST COMMERCIAL, AND OPEN SPACE ZONING DESIGNATIONS, REMOVE THE MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL AND GOLF COURSE ZONING DESIGNATIONS AND ADD MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DESIGNATION WITHIN THE TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN AREA CASE NUMBER: ZONE CHANGE 2017-0002 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE APPLICANT: TRG LAND INC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on August 6, 2024, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by TRG Land, Inc. for approval of General Plan Amendment 2017-0002, Zone Change 2017-0002, Specific Plan 2017-0004, Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM37387) and Development Agreement 2021-0001, and specifically the Zone Change would modify the area and locations of the Low Density Residential, Tourist Commercial, and Open Space zoning designations, remove the Medium High Density Residential, Neighborhood Commercial and Golf Course zoning designations and add Medium Density Residential zoning designation to the City's Zoning Map within the Travertine Specific Plan area more particularly described as: Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 766-110-003, 766-110-004, 766-110-007, 766-110-009; 766-120-001, 766-120-002, 766-120-003, 766-120-006, 766-120-015, 766-120-016, 766-120-018, 766-120-021, 766-120-023; 753-040-014, 753-040-016, 753-040-017; 753-050-007, 753-050-029; 753-060-003; 764-280-057, 764-280-059, 754-280-061; and WHEREAS, the Specific Plan Amendment, General Plan Amendment, and Tentative Tract Map are being adopted by separate Resolution and the Development Agreement is being adopted by separate Ordinance in accordance with state law; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on July 17, 2024, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the site and emailed or mailed to all interested parties who have requested notification relating to the project; and 851 Ordinance No. XXX Zone Change 2017-0002 Project: Travertine Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 2 of 4 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2024-009 recommending City Council adoption of said Zone Change at a duly noticed Public Hearing on June 25, 2024; and WHEREAS, said Zone Change has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (Resolution 83-68). The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2018011023) for Environmental Assessment 2017-0008. The City Council has adopted Resolution 2024- certifying the Environmental Impact Report and making Findings to determine that the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the significant impacts associated with air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and transportation, and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations as Exhibit A of said Resolution, detailing the findings in support of this determination; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.220.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Zone Change [Exhibit A]: 1. The Zone Change is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the General Plan, as described in the attached Exhibit B. 2. Approval of the Zone Change will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare because the community will be entirely self-contained and of high quality and will include homes, a resort, and associated amenities, recreational facilities (parks, trails, golf facility), and perimeter improvements and streets consistent and complementary to improvements surrounding the site. 3. The Zone Change is compatible with the zoning and land use on adjacent properties, which consists of natural areas and planned communities. The proposed plan combines these two conditions to achieve compatibility and continues the pattern of master -planned communities envisioned in the General Plan for southern areas of La Quinta. 4. The Zone Change is suitable and appropriate for the subject property because similar land uses to those currently permitted will be developed and the Zone Change includes modifications necessary to address environmental constraints. 5. Approval of the Zone Change is warranted because the configuration of uses has changed to address environmental constraints as a result of follow-up technical studies for the site as required by the original Travertine 852 Ordinance No. XXX Zone Change 2017-0002 Project: Travertine Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 3 of 4 Environmental Impact Report, and consistency with the conceptual plan for the project is required. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DOES ORDAIN as follows: SECTION 1. FINDINGS AND APPROVAL: That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case, and that the City Council hereby approves and incorporates herein by this reference Zone Change 2017-0002 by the adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the permanent record of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 4. CORRECTIVE AMENDMENTS: the City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments and corrections of typographical or clerical errors to this Ordinance to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on August 6, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: 853 Ordinance No. XXX Zone Change 2017-0002 Project: Travertine Adopted: August 6, 2024 Page 4 of 4 LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 854 ORDINANCE NO. XXX EXHIBIT A DU2`' CaR 41 1A AVE VILE 59 1 1 r - f ` I -�- 4 I'I Existing Zoning Plan Zoning Acres Units Low Density Residential 382.2 1526 Medium Density Residential Medium J High Residential 84.4 774 Neighborhood Commercia 10.0 Tourist Commercial 30.9 Golf Course 3775 Open Space 4.1 NU ste r PI a nned Roadwa s 20.1 Total 9o9,2 2300 Mountain =w' D"4 -77 - -_- QVENUL 62 - - - -' -F: _-. Fes_.'• - _ - r �� � 4 Iti _��.✓ �; I 5 i 1 I _.. AIL t Martinez { Rock Slide �_- L - EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS EGEND I—R—F—I Low Density Residential _ Tourist commercial Proposed Specific Plan Boundary ® %dium High Density ResidenSial Golf Course Existing Specilic Plan Boundary GN Neighhorhoad Commercial open space 855 a LOOPSTREET AVENUE5a I I Y1 Proposed Zoning Plan Zoning Acres Units Low Density Residential 318.0 758 Medium Density Residential 60.8 442 Medium/ High Residential Neighborhood Commercial Tourist Commercial 84.5 Golf Course Open Space 357.1 Master Planned Roadways 35.0 Tota 1 855.4 1200 Coml ] Q, Mounwin MI, 4 � z I T-.-.: _....� ... NAP ssr SraFFT r� AVENUE W f / � f � m r� y L AVENUE M Martinez ' w Rock Slide Ie 1� - PROPOSED ZONING DESIGNATIONS LEGEND Low Dsnsity Residential open space F- �,- Proposed Specific Plan Boundary ® Medium Density Residential 856 _ Tourist Commercial ORDINANCE NO. XXX EXHIBIT B General Plan Consistency: Land Use •GOAL LU-1 Land use compatibility throughout the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides diverse and high -quality housing, tourist commercial, resort and spa, skills golf course with club facilities, and park and recreation opportunities that meet the needs of its residents and bring tourism to the City. The Travertine Specific Plan establishes and maintains connections between existing neighborhoods and the Specific Plan neighborhoods. •GOAL LU-2 High quality design that complements and enhances the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides many high -quality design elements that will ensure the following: a wide array of residential housing; integrates recreational uses; provides tourist commercial uses, preserves open space, and protects scen►c views. •GOAL LU-3 Safe and identifiable neighborhoods that provide a sense of place. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan incorporates design guidelines that will ensure high quality architecture and landscaping. The residential enclaves will be cohesive in design and character and recreational facilities will be consistent with their surrounding neighborhood. The master -planned community of Travertine is designed to complement the surrounding development in the area, incorporating residential, tourist commercial, open space, and park areas into a cohesive plan complementary to uses in the vicinity of the project. This Specific Plan is designed such that compatible land uses, open space areas, landscaped manufactured slopes, and elevation changes serve as buffers between the planned Travertine community and surrounding open space land uses. •GOAL LU-5 A broad range of housing types and choices for all residents of the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides a mix of housing types that include medium, and low -density housing types, designed with enhanced architecture and landscaping, and access to pedestrian walkways, providing a walkable community for the residents. 857 Circulation •GOAL CIR-2 A circulation system that promotes and enhances transit, alternative vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian systems. Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan provides a master planned roadway system with a network of bicycle/pedestrian pathways designed to meet the needs of residents, safely and efficiently transport people and goods, and accommodate the projected residential growth within the community. Livable Community •GOAL SC-1 A community that provides the best possible quality of life for all its residents. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan provides a master planned community that includes over 357 acres of open space (including natural, passive and active areas) which is served by a network of pedestrian, bike and hiking trails, will connect residents and visitors to amenities to meet both active and passive needs. Residents will also have two community parks as well as localized pocket parks within neighborhoods. Visitors and residents will have access to a golf academy, and resort/ spa facilities. Residences will be designed in conformance with high architectural standards. CEC Energy Efficient Standards (CBC Title 24) will be required for all residential and non-residential uses. Solar systems, both passive and active will take advantage of the year-round abundant sunshine. Green Building technology will be promoted to improve resource efficiency in the residential and tourist serving commercial uses. Economic Development • GOAL ED-1 A balanced and varied economic base which provides the City a fiscal stability to the City, and a broad range of goods and services to its residents and the region. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan includes tourist commercial uses that will accommodate and attract residents of the city and visitors, offer new employment opportunities, and contribute to a strong and diversified economic base. The project developer will pay its reasonable fair -share of impact fees and improvement costs to fund the infrastructure improvements and other public facilities necessary to service the planned development • GOAL ED-2 The continued growth of the tourism and Resort/Spa industries in the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan allows for resident and tourist commercial uses that complement and support one another and will help maintain a 858 strong sales and property tax base. The tourist commercial components of the Specific Plan will promote transient occupancy tax, retail, restaurants, and other support uses in a pedestrian -friendly environment which will enhance the fiscal growth potential and real estate values of the City and the Travertine community. Parks, Recreation and Trails • GOAL PR-1 A comprehensive system of parks and recreation facilities and services that meet the active and passive needs of all residents and visitors. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will provide many recreational opportunities, including: two community parks (totaling approximately 13 acres), 6 miles of walkable trails that circumnavigate the community and an additional 5 miles of trails interior to the project providing for a walkable community for the residents. Residential development areas will also have additional localized pocket park areas within the neighborhoods. On -street bike lanes will make it convenient to ride around the project for exercise and local transportation. A Class 11 bikeway will be constructed on the Jefferson Street/Avenue 62 as well as the Loop Streets for the use and enjoyment of La Quinta residents. These amenities will also provide access to the project's, 55.9 acres of recreational open space, and 301 acres of natural open space (including the 152 acres of habitat preservation), as well as the resort/ spa and the golf academy. Housing • GOAL H-1 Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan is designed to provide a range of housing types and densities at varying price points that will help meet the anticipated demand for housing within different economic segments of the City. • GOAL H-5 Provide equal housing opportunities for all persons. Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan developer will encourage the enforcement of laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination in lending practices and in the for -sale or rental housing. • GOAL H-6 Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. 859 Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan incorporates sustainable design strategies that promote energy and water conservation measures. The project is designed to control water runoff and avoid contamination of water resources. All HOA maintained landscaped areas will be designed in a water -efficient manner and drought tolerant plants will be used throughout the individual neighborhoods, the resort/spa and golf course. Title 24 compliance is required for all construction. Air Quality • GOAL AQ-1 A reduction of air emissions generated within the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will expand routes for golf carts and neighborhood electric vehicles, and plan for accessing and recharging facilities at the resort/spa and the golf academy facility. The plan provides an extensive pedestrian and bicycle network of paths, approximately 11 miles of such trails in addition to the on -street bike lanes that will be provided, to allow safe and convenient access to recreational and community facilities. Proposed development air quality emissions and greenhouse gas emissions shall be analyzed under CEQA and adhere to the City's GHG Reduction Plan. All construction activities will minimize emission of all air quality pollutants, grading activities shall adhere to established fugitive dust criteria. The project will implement the air quality mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR. Energy and Mineral Resources • GOAL EM-2 The conservation and thoughtful management of local mineral deposits to assure the long-term viability of limited resources. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will preserve any local mineral resources identified by the Department of Mines and Geology and to the greatest extent possible designate those undeveloped lands as Open Space. The project will implement mineral deposit resource mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR if necessary. Biological Resources • GOAL BIO-1 The protection and preservation of native and environmentally significant biological resources and their habitats. Consistency Analysis: The project has designated 152 acres of protected habitat area along the southern, western, and eastern boundaries of the site. This preserve area will protect known biological resources, including the important habitat for the Bighorn Sheep. The project will implement biological resource mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR. The designated habitat area also includes areas of cultural resources to be protected. F. Me Cultural Resources • GOAL CUL-1 The protection of significant archaeological, historic, and paleontological resources occur in the City. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine Specific Plan will preserve any significant archaeological and historic resources to the greatest extent possible. The project has been redesigned to preserve all nine cultural resources identified that are within or intersect the project. The project will implement mitigation measures as identified in the project EIR. Water Resources • GOAL WR-1 Support the Coachella Valley Water District in its efforts to supply adequate domestic water to residents and businesses. Consistency Analysis: The project will utilize drought tolerant landscaping on all HOA maintained slopes and parkways. The resort/wellness center and the golf academy and its facilities will predominately use water wise landscaping and judicially reduce the use of turf in the golf skills course area. Open Space and Conservation • GOAL OS-1 Preservation, conservation and management of the City's open space lands and scenic resources for enhanced recreation, environmental and economic purposes. Consistency Analysis: The Travertine plan preserves 301 acres for habitat and natural preservation purposes. The vistas of the Santa Rosa Mountains, Coral Mountain and other scenic resources will not be disrupted. Noise • GOAL N-1 A healthful noise environment which complements the City's residential and Resort/Spa character. Consistency Analysis: The project complements the City's residential and Resort/Spa character. The project EIR addresses the potential impacts of noise associated with the proposed development. The Specific Plan will incorporate appropriate design measures and adhere to all applicable restrictions and requirements identified in the EIR to ensure that the potential impacts are mitigated to below a level of significance 861 Soils and Geology • GOAL GEO-1 Protection of the residents' health and safety, and of their property, from geologic and seismic hazards. Consistency Analysis: The project EIR addresses the potential impacts of natural hazards associated with the proposed development. The Specific Plan will incorporate appropriate design measures and adhere to all applicable restrictions and requirements identified in the EIR to ensure that the potential impacts are mitigated to below a level of significance. Flooding and Hydrology • GOAL FH-1 Protection of the health and safety, and welfare of the community from flooding and hydrological hazards. Consistency Analysis: The Specific Plan includes preservation and avoidance of the larger areas related to the identified Middle North and Middle South storm flows to address flooding concerns. Additionally, development has been sufficiently set back from the natural water courses to assure adequate protection of life, property, and habitat values. A reinforced flood protection barrier along the western and southern edge of development will provide flood protection for flows from the adjacent open space and directing the flows to downstream off -site areas along Dike No. 4 and the Guadalupe Dike thereby protecting the project from off -site flows. Hazardous Materials • GOAL HAZ-1 Protection of residents from the potential impacts of hazardous and toxic materials. Consistency Analysis: Development of the project will be evaluated in the EIR and the project will implement all measures identified in the project EIR to protect the residents' safety from potential impacts from hazardous and toxic material. Emergency Services • GOAL ES-1 An effective and comprehensive response to all emergency service needs. Consistency Analysis: Fire protection and emergency response services to the Specific Plan Area will be provided by the City and County. The service levels of fire and police protection needed to adequately serve the Travertine community will be identified and addressed in the Environmental Impact Report being prepared in conjunction with this Specific Plan. Although Madison Street, south of Avenue 60, would be removed as a public right of way, it will be improved as an emergency vehicle accessway (EVA) for 862 access into the Travertine community. During the phased construction of the community, interim solutions have been identified and will be implemented to ensure required access for fire and emergency services will be available at all times. Water Sewer & Other Utilities • GOAL UTL-1 Domestic water facilities and services which adequately serve the existing and long-term needs of the City. Consistency Analysis: The domestic water needs will be provided by Coachella Valley Water District. The water assessment analysis for the Travertine community will be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report being prepared in conjunction with this Specific Plan. • GOAL UTL-2 Sanitary sewer facilities and services which adequately serve the existing and long-term needs of the City. Consistency Analysis: The sewer needs and facilities will be provided by Coachella Valley Water District. The sewer services assessment analysis for the Travertine community will be addressed in the Environmental Impact Report being prepared in conjunction with this Specific Plan. 863 ORDINANCE NO. XXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND TRAVERTINE CORPORATION LLC RELATING TO THE TRAVERTINE PROJECT AND FINDING THAT THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2017- 0008 CASE NUMBER: DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0001 PROJECT: TRAVERTINE APPLICANT: TRG LAND INC WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on August 6, 2024, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by CM Wave Development LLC for approval of General Plan Amendment 2017-0002, Zone Change 2017-0002, Specific Plan 2017-0004, Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM37387) and Development Agreement 2021-0001, for the Travertine project, master -planned community on 855 acres located south of Avenue 60, north of Avenue 64, and west of Madison Street, more particularly described as: Assessor Parcel Numbers (APNs): 766-110-003, 766-110-004, 766-110-007, 766-110-009; 766-120-001, 766-120- 002, 766-120-003, 766-120-006, 766-120-015, 766-120-016, 766-120-018, 766-120- 021, 766-120-023; 753-040-014, 753-040-016, 753-040-017; 753-050-007, 753-050- 029; 753-060-003; 764-280-057, 764-280-059, 754-280-061; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment and Tentative Tract Map are being adopted by separate Resolution and the Zone Change is being adopted by separate ordinance in accordance with state law; and WHEREAS, California Government Code Section 65864 et seq. (the "Development Agreement Law") authorizes cities to enter into binding development agreements with persons having a legal or equitable interest in real property for the development of such property, all for the purpose of strengthening the public planning process, encouraging private participation and comprehensive planning, and identifying the economic costs of such development; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on July 17, 2024 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 1,000 feet of 864 Ordinance No. XXX Development Agreement 2021-0001 Project: Travertine Adopted: Page 2 of 4 the site, and emailed or mailed to all interested parties who have requested notification relating to the project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2024-009 recommending City Council approval of the Development Agreement at a duly noticed Public Hearing on June 25, 2024; and WHEREAS, said Development Agreement has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (Resolution 1983-68). The City prepared an Environmental Impact Report (SCH #2018011023) for Environmental Assessment 2017-0008. The City Council has adopted Resolution 2024- certifying the Environmental Impact Report and making Findings to determine that the benefits of the proposed project outweigh the significant impacts associated with air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, and transportation, and adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations as Exhibit A of said Resolution, detailing the findings in support of this determination; and WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.250.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to justify approval of said Development Agreement, included to this Resolution as Exhibit A, and incorporated herewith by this reference: The Development Agreement is consistent with the objectives, policies, general land uses, and programs specified in the General Plan and the proposed Specific Plan. 2. The Development Agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in and the regulations prescribed in the proposed Specific Plan and implements the Specific Plan's design features. 3. The Development Agreement is in conformity with the public necessity, public convenience, general welfare, and good land use practices because it will provide for public facilities and improvements that will benefit the project and the surrounding area. 4. The Development Agreement will not be detrimental to the health, safety, and general welfare, as it provides for the long-term orderly development of a master planned community. 5. The Development Agreement will not adversely affect the orderly development of property or the preservation of property values insofar as it will ensure that development occurring on the site will assure high quality development and generate revenues. 865 Ordinance No. XXX Development Agreement 2021-0001 Project: Travertine Adopted: Page 3 of 4 6. The Development Agreement will have a positive fiscal impact on the city by providing residences which will generate property tax revenue and by allowing Tourist Commercial uses and short-term vacation rentals which will generate Transient Occupancy Tax and Sales Tax revenues. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DOES ORDAIN as follows: SECTION 1. FINDINGS AND APPROVAL: That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case, and that the City Council hereby approves and incorporates herein by this reference Development Agreement 2021-0001 by the adoption of this Ordinance and authorizes the City Manager to execute the same in substantially the form presented to the City Council with the adoption of this Ordinance. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council, shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the permanent record of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 4. CORRECTIVE AMENDMENTS: The City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments and corrections of typographical or clerical errors to this Ordinance to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on August 6, 2024, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: Ordinance No. XXX Development Agreement 2021-0001 Project: Travertine Adopted: Page 4 of 4 ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 867 ORDINANCE NO. XXX EXHIBIT A DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Attn: City Clerk WITH A CONFORMED COPY TO: Travertine Corporation c/o Hofinann Land Development Company, LLC 3000 Oak Rd, Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Attn: Lou Miramontes Exempt Recording Requested Per Govt. Code 6103 (Space Above This Line for Recorder's Use) TRAVERTINE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA and TRAVERTINE CORPORATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1. DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS...................................................................................... 3 1.1 Definitions..............................................................................................................3 1.2 Exhibits................................................................................................................11 2. MUTUAL BENEFITS AND ASSURANCES................................................................ 11 2.1 Purposes of Agreement........................................................................................ 11 2.2 Undertakings and Assurances Contemplated and Promoted by Development Agreement Act.............................................................................. 12 3. OWNER'S OBLIGATIONS; FINANCING DISTRICTS; PUBLIC FACILITIES....... 13 3.1 In General............................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Financing District and Parameters....................................................................... 13 3.3 Dedication, Construction and Conveyance of Public Facilities ........................... 14 3.4 Provision of Real Property Interests by CITY ..................................................... 14 3.5 Fees and Payments............................................................................................... 15 3.6 Reimbursement of Costs...................................................................................... 15 3.7 Additional Facilities Financed by the Financing District .................................... 15 3.8 Notice to CITY of Product Sales Release............................................................ 15 3.9 Employment of La Quinta Residents and the Hiring of Local Businesses.......... 15 4. REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY......... 16 4.1 Applicable Rules.................................................................................................. 16 4.2 Development of the Project, Planned Development ............................................ 19 4.3 Limitations, Reservations and Exceptions........................................................... 20 4.4 Further Assurances to OWNER Regarding Exercise of Reservations of Authority.............................................................................................................. 22 4.5 Regulation by other Public Agencies................................................................... 23 5. PERIODIC REVIEWS.................................................................................................... 23 5.1 Annual Review..................................................................................................... 23 5.2 Standards for Annual Review.............................................................................. 23 5.3 Certificate of Compliance.................................................................................... 23 6. SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS/TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES........ 23 6.1 Definition.............................................................................................................24 6.2 Short -Term Vacation Rental Use......................................................................... 24 0 F. 6.3 Provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code ...................................................... 24 6.4 Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions.............................................................. 24 7. TRANSFERS AND ASSIGNMENTS; TERMINATION UPON LOT SALE ............... 24 7.1 Transfer and Assignments of Rights and Interests .............................................. 24 7.2 Termination of Agreement Upon Sale of Lots to Public ..................................... 27 8. TERM OF AGREEMENT............................................................................................... 28 8.1 Term.....................................................................................................................28 8.2 Rights and Duties Following Termination........................................................... 28 9. AMENDMENT OR MODIFICATION TO THIS AGREEMENT ................................. 28 10. PROCESSING OF REQUESTS AND APPLICATIONS ............................................... 30 11. DEFAULT, REMEDIES AND ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATES ....................................... 30 11.1 Remedies in General............................................................................................ 30 11.2 Termination of Agreement for Default by OWNER ........................................... 31 11.3 Termination of Agreement for Default by CITY ................................................. 31 11.4 Termination by OWNER Prior to Bond Sale ...................................................... 31 11.5 Specific Performance........................................................................................... 32 11.6 Appointment of Referee....................................................................................... 33 11.7 Estoppel Certificates............................................................................................ 33 12. THIRD PARTY LITIGATION....................................................................................... 34 12.1 Indemnification.................................................................................................... 34 12.2 Option to Terminate............................................................................................. 34 12.3 Defense of Third -Party Claims............................................................................ 35 12.4 Cooperation and Cost Control............................................................................. 35 12.5 No Recourse for Inability to Perform Due to Judicial Determinations ............... 35 13. EFFECT OF AGREEMENT ON TITLE........................................................................ 36 13.1 Covenants Run With the Land............................................................................. 36 13.2 No Dedication or Lien......................................................................................... 37 13.3 Constructive Notice and Acceptance................................................................... 37 14. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION; CERTAIN RIGHTS OF CURE .................................. 37 14.1 Mortgagee Protection........................................................................................... 37 14.2 Mortgagee Not Obligated.................................................................................... 37 14.3 Notice of Default to Mortgagee; Right of Mortgagee to Cure ............................. 37 14.4 Bankruptcy...........................................................................................................38 ii 870 15. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS................................................................................ 38 15.1 Recordation of Agreement................................................................................... 38 15.2 Severability..........................................................................................................38 15.3 Governing Law; Venue........................................................................................ 38 15.4 Section Headings................................................................................................. 38 15.5 Singular and Plural............................................................................................... 38 15.6 Time of Essence................................................................................................... 39 15.7 Waiver..................................................................................................................39 15.8 Force Majeure...................................................................................................... 39 15.9 Attorneys' Fees.................................................................................................... 39 15.10 Mutual Covenants................................................................................................ 39 15.11 Conveyances........................................................................................................40 15.12 Relationship of Parties......................................................................................... 40 15.13 Notices.................................................................................................................40 15.14 Further Actions and Instruments.......................................................................... 41 15.15 Successors and Assigns........................................................................................ 41 15.16 Counterparts.........................................................................................................41 15.17 Authority to Execute............................................................................................ 41 15.18 Entire Agreement................................................................................................. 42 iii 871 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (Govt. Code Sections 65864-65869.5) THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into this day , 2024, by and between the City of La Quinta, a California municipal corporation and charter city organized under the Constitution of the State of California ("CITY"), and Travertine Corporation, LLC, a Minnesota company ("OWNER"). CITY and OWNER are collectively referred to herein as the "Parties" and individually as a "Party." RECITALS This Agreement is entered into based upon the following facts: A. When used in these Recitals, each of the terms defined in Section 1 of this Agreement shall have the meaning given to it therein. B. Government Code Sections 65864-65869.5 ("Development Agreement Act") authorize CITY to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property within its jurisdiction for the development of such real property, in order to, among other things: encourage and, provide for the development of public facilities in connection with the development of new housing; provide certainty in the approval of development projects; encourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning that will make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public; provide assurance to developers that they may proceed with their projects in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, subject to their conditions of approval; and strengthen the public planning process and encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the economic costs of development. C. Pursuant to Section 65865 of the Government Code, City has adopted its Development Agreement Ordinance (La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.250.020, as may be amended from time to time) establishing procedures and requirements for such development agreements ("Development Agreement Ordinance"). D. OWNER is the holder of a legal interest in that certain undeveloped land as more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property") and shown on the depiction of the Property in the site map attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference as Exhibit B ("Site Map"); and desires and intends to develop the Property for the uses and purposes set forth in the Development Plan, generally consisting of a planned community of residential, hospitality, open space, recreational amenities and other resident and visitor serving uses comprised generally of approximately 855 acres, up to 1,200 dwelling units, a 100 room resort and wellness spa, golf and associated recreational and commercial elements, private recreational areas in subdivided areas of the Project, approximately 55.9 acres of recreational open space, and approximately 301.2 acres of natural and preserved open space (collectively, the "Project"). The Project is more fully described in, and subject to (i) this Agreement, (ii) the Travertine Specific Plan, also known as Specific Plan No. SP2017-0004 ("Specific Plan"); (iii) the Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Project, considered and certified by the City Council and the Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Program adopted by the City Council on , by City Council Resolution No. (` EIR"); (iv) General Plan Amendment No. GPA 2017- 0002 ("General Plan Amendment" or "GPA"); (v) Zone Change No. ZC 2017-0002 ("Zone Change"); (vi) Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 2017-0008 ("Tentative Tract Map" or "TTM," and, collectively, the foregoing clauses (i)-(vi) and any and all conditions of approval attached thereto are referred to herein as the "Project Site Development Permits"); and (vii) any Subsequent Development Approvals issued for the Project; (viii) any future subdivision maps approved for the Project (collectively, the "Future Tract Maps"); and (ix) the conditions of 872 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT approval associated with each and all of the foregoing approvals in clauses (i)-(viii) (collectively, referred to herein as "Conditions of Approval"). The documents, permits, approvals, and conditions described in the foregoing clauses (i)-(ix) are collectively referred to herein as the "Project Approvals," and are, or when approved or issued shall be, on file with the City Clerk. The Development of the Property requires substantial early and major capital expenditures and investments with respect to the construction and installation of major infrastructure and facilities, both on -site and off -site, of sufficient capacity to serve the residents and others using the Property as anticipated by the General Plan, the Specific Plan and this Agreement. E. OWNER owns fee simple title to the Property, and by their execution of this Agreement, CITY and OWNER consent to recordation of this Agreement against the Property. F. Consistent with Section 9.250.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, CITY and OWNER desire to enter into a binding agreement that shall be construed as a development agreement within the meaning of the Development Agreement Act. This Agreement will eliminate uncertainty in planning for, and will secure the orderly development of, the Property, ensure a desirable and functional community environment, provide effective and efficient development of public facilities, infrastructure, and services appropriate for the development of the Property, and assure attainment of the maximum effective utilization of resources within the CITY, by achieving the goals and purposes of the Development Agreement Act. In exchange for these benefits to CITY, OWNER desires to receive the assurance that it may proceed with Development of the Property in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and the Project Approvals, all as more particularly set forth herein. G. In anticipation of the Development of the Property, OWNER has made application to CITY for certain approvals, entitlements, findings and permits required for the Development Plan, including as noted above in Recital D above, an amendment to CITY's general plan in effect prior to the date of this Agreement, a specific plan, zone change, a vesting tentative tract map, and this Agreement. H. In accordance with State law and CITY charter, CITY has approved the amendment to and adopted the General Plan which considers and provides for the need for residential, commercial, industrial and other uses, and provides for the public services and circulation facilities that are necessary to meet the future needs of CITY and its population. I. CITY has approved the Project and granted the Project Site Development Permits in order to protect the interests of City's existing and anticipated citizens and the quality of their community and environment through the specific plan process. As part of the process of approving the Project and the Project Site Development Permits, CITY has undertaken, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), the required analyses of the environmental effects which may be caused by the Project and the Existing Development Approvals, and after making all appropriate findings and adopting a Statement of Overriding Considerations, certified a Final Environmental Impact Report for the Project. J. As consideration for the assurances provided by this Agreement, CITY has requested that OWNER provide, and OWNER is willing to provide, various public benefits as described in Exhibit D of this Agreement. The public benefits set forth in Exhibit D include, but are not limited to, certain additional fee contributions and construction of certain public facilities that will benefit residents of CITY as well as future residents of the Property. CITY has determined that the public benefits for which OWNER is obligated, together with the Project Approvals approved and imposed by CITY on the Project, adequately provide for the health, safety, and welfare needs of the future residents of the Property subject to the provisions of this Agreement with respect to future monitoring programs. 2 873 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT K. On May 28, 2024, and continued to June 25, 2024, pursuant to the requirements of the Development Agreement Act and City's Development Agreement Ordinance, the CITY's Planning Commission conducted a duly noticed public hearing on OWNER's application for this Agreement. L On 20_, pursuant to the requirements of the Development Agreement Act and City's Development Agreement Ordinance, the City Council of CITY conducted a duly noticed public hearing on OWNER'S application for this Agreement. M. The City Council of CITY has found and determined that this Agreement: (1) is consistent with CITY's General Plan and the Specific Plan; (2) is in the best interests of the health, safety and general welfare of CITY, its residents and the public; (3) is entered into pursuant to and constitutes a present exercise of the police power by CITY; and (4) is entered into pursuant to and in compliance with the requirements of the Development Agreement Act and City's Development Agreement Ordinance. N. All actions taken by CITY have been duly taken in accordance with all applicable legal requirements, including CEQA, and all other requirements for notice, public hearings, findings, votes and other procedural matters. O. In accordance with the Development Agreement Act and City's Development Agreement Ordinance, the City Council has adopted Ordinance No. finding this Agreement consistent with the General Plan and the Specific Plan and authorizing the execution of this Agreement, and such ordinance shall become effective on , 20_. P. The Parties desire to enter this Agreement regarding the development and use of the Property and intend that this Agreement be considered a Development Agreement as authorized by the Development Agreement Act. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the foregoing Recitals, which are incorporated herein by this reference, the mutual covenants contained herein and other consideration, the value and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows: 1. DEFINITIONS AND EXHIBITS. 1.1 Definitions. In addition to capitalized words and phrases elsewhere in this Agreement, the following capitalized words and phrases when used in this Agreement and the Exhibits attached hereto shall be defined as follows: 1.1.1 "Agreement" means this Development Agreement and all amendments and modifications thereto between CITY and OWNER. 1.1.2 "Annual Review" means the annual review required pursuant to Section 5 below. 1.1.3 "Applicable Rules" means the rules, regulations, resolutions, ordinances, design, improvement, and construction standards and specifications, and officially adopted policies of the City of La Quinta in full force and effect as of the Effective Date of this Agreement implementing the Existing Land Use Regulations, including the City's General Plan (and General Plan Amendment), Zoning Ordinance (as amended by the Zone Change), and the 874 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT Specific Plan. Additionally, notwithstanding the language of this Section or any other language in this Agreement, all specifications, standards and policies regarding the design and construction of public works facilities, if any, shall be those that are in effect at the time the Project plans are being processed for approval and/or under construction specified in Section 4.1 of this Agreement. 1.1.4 "Assignment and Assumption Agreement" means an agreement under which an assignment of OWNER'S rights and obligations under this Agreement are transferred to another person or entity as specified in Section 7. 1.1.5 "Bonds" means the bonds, notes or other evidence of indebtedness issued by or for the Financing District. 1.1.6 `Building and Improvement Standards" means regulations of CITY that are of general application and which establish regulations and standards for the building, construction and installation of structures and associated improvements such as and including, without limitation, CITY's building, plumbing, mechanical, electrical, grading, swimming pool, sign and fire codes. 1.1.7 "CC&Rs" means the Declaration of Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions described in Section 4.2 below. 1.1.8 "CEQA" means the California Environmental Quality Act, Sections 21000 through 21178 of the Public Resources Code, and the State CEQA Guidelines developed by the Office of Planning and Research and promulgated thereto (as may be amended from time to time). 1.1.9 "CFD" means a community facilities district formed pursuant to the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Government Code Section 53311 et seq. as may be amended from time to time). 1.1.10 "CFD Policy" means the Policy for Formation of Land Based Financing Districts adopted by the City (as may be amended from time to time), except to the extent any provision in any amendment to the CFD Policy directly conflicts with the rights vested under this Agreement to form and administer a CFD(s). 1.1.11 "CITY" and "City" means the geographical area within the boundaries of the City of La Quinta, a Charter law city and municipal corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of California, including each and every agency, department, board, commission, authority, employee, and/or official acting under the authority of the City, including without limitation the City Council and the Planning Commission. Unless otherwise specified herein or required by applicable law, any approval by City means an approval by the City Manager. 1.1.12 "City AttorneX" means the City Attorney of CITY. 1.1.13 "Ci . Clerk" means the City Clerk of CITY. 1.1.14 "City Council" means the City Council of CITY. 1.1.15 "City Manager" means the City Manager (or authorized designee) of CITY. 1.1.16 "Conditions of Approval" shall have the meaning set forth in Recital D of this Agreement. The Conditions of Approval include the Conditions of Approval for Project Site Development Permits. 875 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 1.1.17 "Conditions of Approval for Project Site Development Permits" means the conditions of approval attached to the Project Site Development Permits as described in Recital D. 1.1.18 "CVWD" means the Coachella Valley Water District, a public water agency, formed and operating pursuant to State law. 1.1.19 "Davis -Stirling Act" means the Davis -Stirling Common Interest Development Act in California Civil Code Section 4000 et seq. (as may be amended from time to time). 1.1.20 "Developer" has the same meaning as OWNER as defined in this Agreement. 1.1.21 "Development" means the improvement of the Property for purposes of effecting the structures, improvements and facilities comprising the Project, including without limitation: grading and construction of infrastructure and Public Facilities related to the Project (whether located within or outside the Property); construction of structures and buildings; and installation of landscaping. "Development" shall not include the maintenance, repair, reconstruction or redevelopment of any structures, improvements or facilities after completion of the initial construction thereof. 1.1.22 "Development Agreement Act" means Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code (as may be amended from time to time). 1.1.23 "Development Agreement Ordinance" shall have the meaning set forth in Recital C of this Agreement. 1.1.24 "Development Approval(sY' means, in general, site specific plans, maps, permits and other entitlements, whether discretionarily or ministerially issued, by the City for the use of and in connection with development and use of any real property located within the City, including but not limited to: specific plans, zone changes, general plan amendments, environmental impact report certifications or other environmental review determination, tentative and final subdivision tract maps, vesting tentative maps, conditional use permits, and grading, building, occupancy, and other similar permits. 1.1.25 "Development Exactions" means the requirements of CITY in connection with or pursuant to any Land Use Regulations or Development Approvals for the dedication of land or property for public use, the payment of fees or money in -lieu of such a dedication, or the construction or improvement of public facilities in order to lessen, offset, mitigate or compensate for the adverse impacts of the Project on environmental or other public concerns or interests or for the improvement, construction or acquisition of any public infrastructure, facilities or property. The term shall not include Processing Fees, Impact Fees, or assessments and taxes. 1.1.26 "Development Impact Fees" means any and all fees imposed and authorized pursuant to the Mitigation Fee Act, Section 66000 et seq. of the California Government Code, and any and all CITY ordinances, resolutions, and policies implementing the same, including but not limited to the La Quinta Municipal Code (all as may be amended from time to time). 1.1.27 "Development Plan" means the Specific Plan. 5 876 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 1.1.28 "Discretionary Action" means an action which allows for the exercise of judgment, deliberation or a decision on the part of City, including any board, commission, committee, or department or any officer or employee thereof, to shape the project by requiring modifications which could respond to any of the concerns which might be identified by environmental review in the process of approving or disapproving a particular activity, as distinguished from an activity which merely requires City, including any board, commission or department or any officer or employee thereof, to determine whether there has been compliance with statutes, ordinances, regulations, or other fixed standards and the agency has no discretionary authority to deny or shape the project. 1.1.29 "Discretionary Permits" means any permits, approvals, plans, Future Tract Maps, inspections, certificates, documents, and licenses that require a Discretionary Action, including, without limitation, site development permits, grading permits, stockpile permits, and encroachment permits. 1.1.30 "Economic Expectations" means the reasonable, investment - based economic expectations with respect to the completion of the Project in accordance with the Applicable Rules and Project Site Development Permits, taking into consideration technical, financing, market and other factors. 1.1.31 `Effective Date" means the date that this Agreement is recorded in the Official Records of Riverside County, California. 1.1.32 `EIR" means the Final Environmental Impact Report prepared for the Travertine Specific Plan, State Clearinghouse Number 2018011023 certified by City Council Resolution No. - on , 20 1.1.33 `Estoppel Certificate" means the certificate provided at the request of either Party as further defined and described in Section 11.7. 1.1.34 `Existing Development Approvals" means those certain Development Approvals defined as the Project Site Development Permits but excluding this Agreement (i.e., clauses (ii) through (vi) in Recital D of this Agreement), which are applicable to the Property in effect on the Effective Date, listed as the "Existing Development Approvals" that are included as a part of the Existing Land Use Regulations listed on Exhibit C. 1.1.35 `Existing Land Use Regulations" means the Land Use Regulations in effect on the Effective Date of this Agreement, including: (a) the permitted uses of the Property, (b) the density and intensity of use, maximum height and setback requirements of proposed buildings, (c) provisions for the reservation and dedication of land for public purposes, (d) traffic study guidelines, (e) requirements for Development Exactions (excepting those subject to the City's Reserved Powers and Reservation of Authority), and (f) standards regarding buildings and improvements, a list of which is set forth on Exhibit C. A digital archive or binder containing the Existing Land Use Regulations in effect on the Effective Date shall be available to each Party on the Vesting Date and thenafter maintained by each Party for future reference. 1.1.36 "Financing District" or "District" means one or more CFDs, authorized pursuant to State law and approved by the City Council pursuant thereto, for purposes of financing and/or acquiring one or more public improvements, public facilities, public services or public facilities fees within the CITY. 1.1.37 "Future Tract Maps" shall have the meaning set forth in Recital D of this Agreement. 0 877 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 1.1.38 "General Plan" means the General Plan of CITY as said General Plan exists on the Effective Date of this Agreement (which includes the General Plan Amendment. 1.1.39 "General Plan Amendment" or "GPA" shall have the meaning set forth in Recital D of this Agreement. 1.1.40 "Impact Fees" means impact fees, linkage fees, exactions, assessments or fair share charges or other similar impact fees or charges imposed by the City on and in connection with new development, including Development Impact Fees and Quimby Fees. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, none of the following shall constitute Impact Fees: (i) Processing Fees, (ii) impact fees, linkage fees, exactions, assessments or fair share charges or other similar fees or charges imposed by other governmental entities and which City is required to collect or assess pursuant to applicable law, including, without limitation, school district impact fees pursuant to Government Code Section 65995, fees required pursuant to the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, and the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee, or (c) other City-wide fees or charges of general applicability, provided that such City-wide fees or charges are not imposed as an impact fee on new development. 1.1.41 "Insubstantial Modification" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 9(a) of this Agreement. 1.1.42 "Land Use Regulations" means, in general, any regulations or policies of CITY governing the permitted uses of land, density and intensity of use and the design, improvement, and construction standards and specifications applicable to the development and use of any real property located within the City, including, but not limited to, City's General Plan, Zoning Ordinance, Development Approvals, Development Exactions and all other ordinances, resolutions, rules and regulations adopted or utilized by CITY for the processing of development projects. The term Land Use Regulations does not include, however, regulations relating to the conduct of business, professions and occupations generally; taxes and assessments; regulations for the control and abatement of nuisances; encroachment and other permits and the conveyances of rights and interests that provide for the use of or entry upon public property; and, any exercise of the power of eminent domain. 1.1.43 "Ministerial Permits and Approvals" means the permits, approvals, plans, inspections, certificates, documents, licenses, and all other actions required to be taken by CITY in order for OWNER to implement, develop and construct the Project and the Mitigation Measures, including without limitation, building permits, foundation permits, and other similar permits and approvals which are required by the La Quinta Municipal Code and Project plans and other actions required by the Project Approvals to implement the Project and the Mitigation Measures. Ministerial Permits and Approvals shall not include any Discretionary Actions or Discretionary Permits. 1.1.44 "Mitigation Measures" means the mitigation measures described in the EIR and in the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Project Design Features, approved and adopted for the Project. The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Project Design Features are set forth in in Exhibit I attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 1.1.45 "Mortgage" means a mortgage, deed of trust or sale and leaseback arrangement or other transaction in which the Property, or a portion thereof or an interest therein, is pledged as security, contracted for in good faith and for fair value. 1.1.46 "Mortgagee" means the holder of the beneficial interest under a Mortgage, or the owner of the property, or interest therein, subject to a Mortgage. 7 878 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 1.1.47 "New Laws" means amendments or modifications to the Applicable Rules, and all ordinances, resolutions, initiatives, regulations, rules, laws, plans, policies, and guidelines of the CITY and its City Council, Planning Commission, and all other CITY boards, commissions, departments, agencies, and committees enacted or adopted after the Effective Date. 1.1.48 "OWNER" and "Owner" means Travertine Corporation, a Minnesota company, and its successors and assigns. 1.1.49 "Owner's Obligations" - means the obligations of OWNER to pay the sums, build and construct the improvements, dedicate the lands and improvements and undertake and perform the other actions described in Section 3 and the Description of Public Benefits described on Exhibit D. 1.1.50 "Parties" means collectively OWNER and CITY. Each shall be referred to in the singular as a "Party". 1.1.51 "Planning Commission" means the CITY Planning Commission and the planning agency of the CITY pursuant to California Government Code Section 65867. 1.1.52 "Potential Public Properties" means the properties listed on Exhibit F which OWNER shall reserve for purchase by CITY. 1.1.53 "Processing Fees" means all processing fees and charges required by City to cover the City's cost of processing permits and other land use entitlements and conducing the associated inspections, including, but not limited to, fees for filing land use applications, plan check fees, inspection fees, and other processing or administrative fees. Processing Fees shall not include Impact Fees. The amount of the Processing Fees to be applied in connection with the development of the Project shall be the amount which is in effect on a City- wide basis at the time an application for the City action is made. Notwithstanding the language of this Section or any other language in this Agreement, OWNER shall not be exempt from the payment of fees, if any, imposed on a City-wide basis as part of City's program for storm water pollution abatement mandated by the Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972 and subsequent amendments thereto, unless a waiver of these fees is provided by City in a subsequent agreement. 1.1.54 "Project" means the development project defined in Recital D of this Agreement and contemplated by the Development Plan with respect to the Property, including but not limited to on -site and off -site improvements, and as further defined, enhanced or modified pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. 1.1.55 "Project Approvals" shall have the meaning set forth in Recital D of this Agreement. 1.1.56 "Project Site Development Permits" shall have the meaning set forth in Recital D of this Agreement. 1.1.57 "Pro e " has the same meaning as set forth in Recital D and is further defined to mean those certain lands comprising approximately 855.4 acres of land within the boundaries of City, located southwest of Avenue 60, east, north and south of Avenue 62, and southwest of Madison Street, as more particularly described in Exhibit A and depicted on the Site Map in Exhibit B. 1.1.58 "Public Facilities" means those certain lands and facilities to be improved, constructed, and dedicated or conveyed to the public pursuant to Section 3.1, as 879 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT described in Exhibit D, including, but not limited to, utility, infrastructure and transportation improvements, as well as fees required to be paid to mitigate the impact on public services as a result of the development of the Project. 1.1.59 "Public Works" means certain improvements constructed by OWNER or under the direction of OWNER that are considered to be a public work requiring the payment of prevailing wages under Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. (as may be amended from time to time). 1.1.60 "Recorder's Office" means the Office of Official Records for Riverside County, California. 1.1.61 "Reservations of Authority" means the rights and authority excepted from the assurances and rights provided to OWNER in Section 4.1 and reserved to CITY therein and in Section 4.3. 1.1.62 "Reserved Powers" means the rights and authority excepted from this Agreement's restrictions on City's police powers and which are instead reserved to City, its City Council, Planning Commission, and all other City boards, commissions, departments, agencies, and committees. The Reserved Powers include the powers to enact or adopt New Laws or take future Discretionary Actions after the Effective Date of this Agreement that may be in conflict with the Applicable Rules and Project Approvals, except such New Laws which would prevent, or materially impair OWNER'S ability to develop the Project in accordance with the Project Approvals; provided, however, that with respect to such New Laws which would conflict with this Agreement or prevent, or materially impair OWNER'S ability to develop the Project in accordance with the Project Approvals, such New Laws shall apply to the Project only if such New Laws are: (1) necessary to protect the public health and safety, and are generally applicable on a City-wide basis (except in the event of natural disasters as found by the City Council such as floods, earthquakes and similar acts of God, which shall apply even if not applicable on a City- wide basis); (2) amendments to Uniform Codes, as adopted by City, and/or the La Quinta Municipal Code, as applicable, regarding the construction, engineering and design standards for private and public improvements to be constructed on the Site; (3) amendments to the amounts for Impact Fees, Processing Fees, and the amounts for fees or money in -lieu of dedication of land or property that constitute Development Exactions; (4) required by a non -City governmental entity to be adopted by or applied by the City (or, if adoption is optional, the failure to adopt or apply such non -City law or regulation would cause the City to sustain a significant loss of funds or loss of access to significant funding or other resources), or (5) necessary to comply with state or federal laws and regulations (whether enacted previous or subsequent to the Effective Date of this Agreement). 1.1.63 "Roadway Capacity Utilization" means the extent to which Traffic Generation from the Project as contemplated by the Development Plan will utilize the capacity of existing and planned future roads, freeways, freeway ramps and intersections in the City and surrounding area as more fully described in Section 4.3(b). 1.1.64 "Schedule of Performance" means the schedule for the development and phasing plan for the Project as set forth in Exhibit H attached hereto and incorporated into this Agreement by this reference. 1.1.65 "Short -Term Vacation Rentals Regulations" means Chapter 3.25 (or successor chapter and as may be amended from time to time) of the La Quinta Municipal Code that governs the application, permitting, renewal, use, operation, penalties, and other provisions relating to short-term vacation rentals in the City, in effect at the time during the Term of this 0 ::0 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT Agreement, except to the extent any provision in Chapter 3.25 directly conflicts with the rights vested as set forth in Section 6 of this Agreement. 1.1.66 "Site" has the same meaning as "Property" as defined in this Agreement. 1.1.67 "Site Development Plan" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 9.180.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 1.1.68 "Site Map" means the map of the Site and immediately adjacent properties, which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference. 1.1.69 "Specific Plan" shall have the meaning as set forth in Recital D of this Agreement. 1.1.70 "Statement of Overriding Considerations" shall mean the Statement of Overriding Conditions, adopted by the City pursuant to CEQA with the certification of the EIR. 1.1.71 "Subsequent Development APproval(s)" means any and all Development Approvals required or requested with respect to the Project following the Effective Date. 1.1.72 "Substantial Amendment(s)" shall have the meaning set forth in Section 9(b). 1.1.73 "Term" means the period of time for which the Agreement shall be effective in accordance with Section 8 of this Agreement. 1.1.74 "TOT" means Transient Occupancy Tax levied by the City, in accordance with Chapter 3.24 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (as may be amended from time to time) and applicable state law, and deposited into the City's general fund after remittance by all operators (or other entities or individuals) subject to the tax. 1.1.75 "Traffic Generation" means the future traffic that will be generated by the Project as contemplated by the Development Plan as more fully described in Section 4.3(b). 1.1.76 "Transferee" means individually or collectively, OWNER's successors in interest, assignees or transferees of all or any portion of the Site. 1.1.77 "Uniform Codes" means those building, electrical, mechanical, plumbing, fire and other similar regulations of a City-wide scope which are based on recommendations of a multi -state professional organization and become applicable throughout the City, such as, but not limited to, the Uniform Building Code, the Uniform Electrical Code, the Uniform Mechanical Code, Uniform Plumbing Code, or the Uniform Fire Code (including those amendments to the promulgated uniform codes which reflect local modification to implement the published recommendations of the multi -state organization and which are applicable City-wide). 1.1.78 "Vesting Date" means the date after (i) the Effective Date of this Agreement, and (ii) the date of the expiration of the running of the applicable statute of limitations and referendum petition deadlines to challenge the adoption of all of the Project Site Development Permits, with no legal challenge or petition having been filed or submitted, or if filed or submitted, successfully resolved to the satisfaction of Owner and City. The City shall have the right to deliver 10 881 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT to the Parties a written confirmation of the Vesting Date, but the Vesting Date shall be the date as set forth in the preceding sentence regardless of whether or when the City delivers such notice. 1.1.79 "Zone Change" shall have the meaning set forth in Recital D of this Agreement. 1.1.80 "Zoning Ordinance" means Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (as may be amended from time to time). 1.2 Exhibits. The reference to a specified "Exhibit" in this Agreement is a reference to any one of the exhibits listed below, as determined by the accompanying letter designation, which exhibits are attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. Exhibit A Legal Description of Property Exhibit B Site Map / Depiction of the Property Exhibit C Existing Land Use Regulations Exhibit D Description of Public Benefits Exhibit E Form of Grant Deed/Offer For Public Facilities Exhibit F Financing of Public Facilities and Potential Public Properties Exhibit G Chapter 3.25 of La Quinta Municipal Code as of Effective Date Exhibit H Schedule of Performance / Phasing Plan Exhibit I Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and Project Design Features 2. MUTUAL BENEFITS AND ASSURANCES. 2.1 Purposes of Agreement. The Development Plan is the result of years of planning effort by both OWNER and CITY. Because of this extended planning effort, the Development Plan includes a number of public facilities and other features that will significantly benefit the public as well as occupants of the Project. To secure these benefits, CITY and OWNER have mutually agreed to enter into this Agreement, which (a) assures the Parties' participation in the construction, funding and dedication of numerous public facilities that will provide significant benefits for residents of CITY and service anticipated levels of occupancy within the Property, and (b) assures OWNER that the Development of the Property will be governed by the Existing Land Use Regulations and that the Development Exactions required in connection with the Development Plan will be those specified in this Agreement. The following is a list of some of the more significant public benefits listed on Exhibit D that are incorporated into the Development of the Project: (a) Fiscal Contributions: generation of substantial annual revenue for CITY's general fund and the CITY accounts, as well as substantial payments of Impact Fees, for use in enhancing fire and police equipment and staffing, school fees and library equipment; 11 882 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT (b) Public Access and Open Space: provision of approximately 357.1 acres of open space, which includes (a) approximately 55.9 acres to be dedicated or used for public recreational, staging areas, gathering areas and trail purposes, open space uses including picnic tables, barbeques, golf practice facilities, and staging facilities for the public regional interpretative trail and (b) preservation of approximately 301.2 acres for conservation and preservation purposes together with endowment funding at no cost to CITY to ensure management and monitoring of the natural open space in perpetuity. In addition, the Project will provide pedestrian walkways, a network of interior trails suitable for pedestrian use and bike lanes, including Class II bike lanes located along both sides of Jefferson Street that will allow bicyclists and pedestrians access to surrounding parks, recreational trails, open space and commercial centers; (c) Transportation and Traffic Improvements: construction of the extension and beautification of Jefferson Street (including widening, surfacing, curb and gutter placement, addition of Class II bike lanes located along both sides of Jefferson Street, and landscape improvements); installation of traffic signals and numerous right and left -turn lanes on a number of City streets; and construction of the extension and various other improvements to Avenue 62 that will reduce roadway flooding during storm events and stabilize slopes to improve public safety; (d) Infrastructure Upgrades/Enhancements: construction and upgrades of domestic water system facilities, water tanks and pump stations; construction and extension of on -site and off -site sewers, storm drains, water, electricity, natural gas and other facilities; installation of water quality basins and use of biological filtering swales to enhance runoff to receiving waters at Dike 4; (e) Use of Sustainable Features in Project Design: as described more fully in the Development Plan and EIR, incorporation of energy -efficient and conservation - oriented features within the Project, including installing green roofs and solar panels on buildings within the Specific Plan, incorporating in -home batteries and EV charger stations to facilitate use of EVs, golf carts and other low -speed electric vehicles; requiring all single-family homes to be electric ready and include electrical circuits for space heating, water heating, ovens, clothes dryers; requiring electrical panels, branch circuits and transfer switches for battery storage; considering orientating buildings to reduce the development's impact on the natural environment; implementing passive and active solar systems to take advantage of and consider the year-round abundant sunshine; implementing a water conservation strategy demonstrating a 20 percent reduction in indoor and outdoor water usage; implementation of 50 percent waste diversion in order to reduce the amount of waste disposal at landfills; requiring use of "green" building techniques, home features utilizing low -flow bathroom fixtures and that all household and other appliances be of the highest energy efficiency practicable at the time of purchase; requiring use of environmentally -conscious site planning, so that street, trail, park and housing locations are situated to minimize vehicular trips and reduce exhaust emissions; requiring that all landscaping be desert and other drought tolerant vegetation; requiring all HVAC systems to be Very High Efficiency HVAC (SEER 16/80% AFUE or 9HSPF) or greater efficiency; requiring all domestic hot water systems be Very High Efficiency Water (0.92 Energy Factors) with Enhanced Solar Pre -heat System (min. 0.35 Net Solar Fraction); and requiring all potable water fixtures to have EPA WaterSense Certification or greater efficiency. 2.2 Undertakings and Assurances Contemplated and Promoted by Development Agreement Act. The mutual undertakings and assurances described above and provided in this Agreement are for the benefit of CITY and OWNER and promote the comprehensive planning, private and public cooperation and participation in the provision of public facilities, and the effective and 12 883 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT efficient development of infrastructure and facilities, in connection with the implementation of development projects as contemplated and promoted by the Development Agreement Act. 3. OWNER'S OBLIGATIONS; FINANCING DISTRICTS; PUBLIC FACILITIES. 3.1 In General. (a) Public Benefits. It is acknowledged that a primary purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the accelerated and coordinated completion of Public Facilities and the other public benefits described in Exhibit D. Accordingly, when OWNER proceeds with Development of the Project, OWNER shall fully perform OWNER's Obligations as set forth in and subject to the terms and conditions of Exhibit D and this Agreement, including but not limited to the undertakings in connection with the construction and dedication or conveyance of the Public Facilities. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, CITY acknowledges and agrees that, other than for OWNER's obligations with respect to the Jefferson Street circulation improvements described in Exhibit D, OWNER shall have no obligations with respect to any matter described in Exhibit D until the issuance by CITY to OWNER of the first Subsequent Development Approval for the Project after issuance of the mass grading permit for grading of the Project. (b) Existing Conditions and Undertakings for Land Use and Development. Subject to the City's Reserved Powers and Reservation of Authority, the OWNER shall be obligated to and shall perform all of the duties and obligations provided for or required by the Project Approvals, the Applicable Rules, and the Schedule of Performance, in connection with the Development of the Property and the Project. 3.2 Financing District and Parameters. (a) Formation of Financing District(s). Upon the receipt of a written request ("Request") by OWNER in a form and content consistent with the City's CFD Policy, Subsection (c) below, and reasonably acceptable to CITY, CITY shall use its best efforts to form one or more Financing Districts in the form and type specified in the Request, which shall include the Property, or portion thereof, within its/their boundaries for the purpose of funding the planning, design, construction and/or acquisition of Public Facilities and/or Potential Public Properties, or to provide for operation and maintenance as agreed upon by OWNER and CITY, and shall cause the Financing District(s) to issue, from time to time, Bonds subject to market conditions to finance such activities (including, without limitation, all costs of forming and administering the Financing District(s) and issuing and selling such Bonds). Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Section is not intended to limit the ability of the Parties to create other forms of financing districts regarding the Project upon mutual agreement. In addition, if CITY elects to not act as the lead agency for the establishment of a Financing District, at Owner's request, City agrees that another agency authorized to establish a Financing District, such as the California Statewide Communities Development Authority ("CSCDA") may act as the lead agency in establishing the Financing District(s). In that event, City shall enter into a joint community facilities agreement with such other agency pursuant to Government Code Section 53316.2 authorizing such other agency to establish the Financing District consistent with the applicable provisions of Exhibit F. (b) No Obligation to Form District(s). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties acknowledge that nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed as requiring CITY or its City Council to form a Financing District or cause a Financing District to issue Bonds. (c) Parameters Regarding Districts. In the event that one or more Financing Districts are formed to provide funding for the construction or acquisition of Public 13 884 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT Facilities or Potential Public Properties, or both, the Parties agree that the parameters set forth in the CFD Policy and in Exhibit F shall govern the formation of each Financing District and issuance of Bonds. 3.3 Dedication, Construction and Conveyance of Public Facilities. (a) In General. The Public Facilities to be dedicated or conveyed (in the case of lands) or constructed by OWNER and dedicated or conveyed to CITY as described in Exhibit D, shall be completed in accordance with the provisions of Exhibit D and this Agreement, the Existing Development Approvals, the Schedule of Performance, and designs, specifications and standards promulgated by CITY in accordance with Existing Land Use Regulations, and dedicated or conveyed to CITY as set forth in Exhibit D, or substantially in the form set forth in Exhibit E attached hereto, or in any other form of dedication or conveyance agreement or document agreed in writing by CITY. (b) Public Facilities; Subdivision Requirements. With respect to any such Public Facilities as to which only a preliminary phase is required to be completed under this Agreement as provided in Exhibit D, such Public Facilities shall be completed in connection with the Development of the Property as required by the Existing Land Use Regulations unless otherwise provided in this Agreement. (c) Public Works; Prevailing Wages. To the extent improvements to be constructed by OWNER or under the direction of OWNER hereunder are considered to be a public works requiring the payment of prevailing wages under Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. as may be amended from time to time ("Public Works"), OWNER shall cause the contractor and subcontractors to pay prevailing wages in the construction of the improvements as those wages are determined pursuant to California Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and implementing regulations of the California Department of Industrial Relations and comply with the other applicable provisions of Labor Code Sections 1720 et seq. and implementing regulations of the Department of Industrial Relations. 3.4 Provision of Real Property Interests by CITY. In any instance where OWNER is required by CITY to construct any Public Facilities on lands not owned by OWNER, as a condition precedent to the performance of such obligation, CITY shall provide or cause to be provided the real property rights and interests necessary for the construction of such Public Facilities. Costs associated with such acquisition or condemnation proceedings, if any, shall be OWNER'S responsibility, and may be included in the applicable Financing District. Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph in this Section 3.4, if OWNER owned any lands as all or any portion of the Property as of the Effective Date of this Agreement, and OWNER subsequently from the Effective Date sells, conveys, or in any manner transfers (whether for consideration or not) those lands to a Transferee, then CITY shall have no obligation to provide or cause to be provided the real property rights and interests necessary for the construction of such Public Facilities. Nothing in this Section 3.4 or this Agreement is or may be deemed a representation or commitment by the CITY to initiate any condemnation proceedings of any lands or real property, nor a representation or commitment by the CITY to exercise its power of eminent domain. The CITY reserves all discretionary authority over whether to exercise its power of eminent domain, and any condemnation proceedings shall be in accordance with applicable state laws, including the "Eminent Domain Law" (Code of Civil Procedure, section 1230.010 et seq., as may be amended from time to time). 14 885 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 3.5 Fees and Payments. OWNER shall pay all fees and charges, including Impact Fees, Processing Fees, and payments of fees or money in lieu of a dedication of land that is otherwise a Development Exaction, in the amounts set by the City at the time when such payment for such fee or charge is due and payable to the City. Additionally, OWNER has agreed to pay fees to CITY to fund the provision of police, fire and other services set forth in Exhibit D. 3.6 Reimbursement of Costs. Unless otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement, OWNER shall reimburse CITY for costs and expenses incurred by CITY on and after the Effective Date as necessary for the implementation of the Development Plan and this Agreement as follows: (a) Standard Fees. OWNER shall reimburse CITY for the following items in accordance with CITY's standard fee schedule in effect at the time when such payment for such fee is due and payable to the City: (i) plan check, issuance and inspection of building permits; (ii) inspections related to construction of Public Facilities; (iii) review and processing of documents related to the conveyance of Public Facilities from OWNER to CITY; (iv) review and processing of documents related to Subsequent Development Approvals as requested or submitted by OWNER; and, (v) environmental review in connection with Subsequent Discretionary Approvals as required by CEQA; (b) Reasonably Necessary Costs. OWNER shall reimburse CITY for any and all reasonable costs and expenses, including reasonably necessary consulting and attorneys' fees, incurred by CITY ("reasonably necessary costs") in connection with the following items: (i) periodic compliance reviews pursuant to Section 5; (ii) formation of Financing Districts, the issuance of Bonds, and any other matters contemplated by or related to Section 3.2 and in accordance with Exhibit F; (iii) review and processing of OWNER's request to approve an Assignment and Assumption Agreement as provided in Section 7; and, (iv) negotiation, purchase and financing of property for public use pursuant to Section 3.7. 3.7 Additional Facilities Financed by the Financing District. OWNER shall cooperate with CITY regarding potential other facilities to be financed by a Financing District. Approval of any such facilities by CITY shall be contingent on CITY's prior compliance with the CEQA. 3.8 Notice to CITY of Product Sales Release. Subject to the reasonable cooperation of merchant builders within the Project, OWNER shall use good faith efforts to provide notice to CITY at least ten (10) days prior to advertising the initial sales release of each builder product type within the Project. CITY shall have the right, at its cost, to publish such information on its public access channel or through use of any other media source to residents of City. Such advance notice shall not affect in any manner the sales price, qualifications to purchase, or any other terms or conditions of sale for homes within the Project, all of which shall be established by each respective merchant builder in connection with the marketing and sale of their product. 3.9 Employment of La Quinta Residents and the Hiring of Local Businesses. OWNER shall encourage its contractors and merchant builders who participate in the Development to make reasonable efforts to provide opportunities for employment to residents of the City possessing the proper qualifications and experience for available positions. OWNER shall 15 M. DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT also encourage its contractors and merchant builders to consider use or retention of properly qualified and experienced City residents and local businesses and vendors in the provision of goods and services used in connection with development of the Project. In no event is this policy meant to require that contractors and merchant builders contract for services or supplies with less competitive firms or to employ residents who are not properly qualified or experienced solely due to local residency. 4. REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY. 4.1 Applicable Rules. Subject to the City's Reservations of Authority, and except as otherwise specified in this Agreement and the Project Approvals, the rules, regulations and official policies governing the permitted uses of the Property, the density and intensity of use of the Property, the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes and the design, improvement and construction standards and specifications applicable to the Property are the Existing Land Use Regulations, including without limitation the General Plan and the Development Plan. (a) Permitted Uses. The uses permitted hereunder in accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulations are as set forth in the Development Plan. (b) Number of Units, Density and Intensity. The total number, density and intensity of units permitted hereunder in accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulations are as set forth in the Development Plan. The density of development may be distributed by OWNER disproportionately throughout the Property in accordance with and subject to the Development Plan. OWNER shall construct the Project on the Site only in accordance with the Project Approvals. As depicted in the Project Approvals, as the same may be updated or amended from time to time consistent with the terms hereof, the residential portions of Project shall consist of residential single-family development specifically developed and available for residential purposes, and may be the residents' primary residences or secondary residences, and/or may be used for short-term vacation rentals, with the following components: (1) Annual permitting fees to be consistent with the City's fee program; (2) Any rental or occupancy of thirty (30) nights or less to be subject to the City's then -current transient occupancy tax (TOT) for short-term vacation rentals; (3) Rental or occupancy agreements, and material renter or occupant information, shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years (or other retention period as maybe approved by City policy or code) by the OWNER or OWNER's authorized management company for the short-term vacation rentals at the Site; (4) Subject to applicable federal or state law or regulation, occupancy in any residence, including residences used as short-term vacation rentals, shall be capped at two (2) persons per bedroom, plus one (1) person; provided, however, that there may be an increase in occupancy allowances for permitted short-term vacation rentals as set forth in the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations in effect as of the date of the issued permit, or, if the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations (or relevant provisions regarding occupancy allowances are repealed for any reason during the Term of this Agreement), then the occupancy allowances 16 887 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT for permitted short-term vacation rentals shall be the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations most recently in effect prior to being repealed and shall remain applicable for the balance of the Term of this Agreement; and (5) All residences at the Site shall allow for transient occupancy, which means occupancy for thirty (30) days or less. (6) In addition to the provisions in this Section 4.1, all short- term vacation rentals shall comply with Section 6 of this Agreement. (c) Maximum Height and Size of Buildings. The maximum height and size of the buildings within the Property permitted hereunder in accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulations are as set forth in the Development Plan. (d) Golf TrainingFacility and Resort Component. Inclusion by City of parcels in the Development Plan for a golf training component shall have an underlying residential zoning designation to enable the parcel to be developed with residential land uses. If within three (3) years from the Effective Date, Owner is unsuccessful in marketing the golf training parcel to a commercial developer, Owner shall be entitled to develop the parcel with residential land uses. In such case, the number of residential units developed on said parcel shall be included in the maximum density permitted by the Specific Plan. "Marketing" for purposes of this provision shall mean undertaking reasonable efforts to advertise the property to commercial developers. (e) Reservations and Dedication of Lands for Public Purposes and Undertaking to Participate in Completion of Roadways and Public Facilities. As provided in Section 3, OWNER is obligated to dedicate, sell or convey certain lands and construct and convey to CITY certain Public Facilities and to provide certain public benefits. (f) Timing of Development. The Parties acknowledge that the most efficient and economic Development of the Property depends upon numerous factors such as market orientation and demand, interest rates, competition and similar factors and that generally it will be most economically beneficial to the ultimate purchasers to have the rate of Development determined by OWNER. Accordingly, subject to the Schedule of Performance and Applicable Rules, the timing, sequencing and phasing of Development shall be as determined by OWNER in its sole subjective business judgment and discretion. The Schedule of Performance may be modified as an Insubstantial Modification pursuant to Section 9 of this Agreement. In Pardee Construction Co. v. City of Camarillo (1984) 37 Cal. 3d 465, the California Supreme Court held that a construction company was not exempt from a city's growth control ordinance notwithstanding that the construction company and the city had entered into a consent judgment (tantamount to a contract under California law) establishing the company's vested rights to develop its property in accordance with the zoning. The California Supreme Court reached this result on the basis that the consent judgment failed to address the timing of development. It is the intent of the Parties to avoid the result of the Pardee case by acknowledging and providing in this Agreement that OWNER shall have the vested right, subject to the Applicable Rules and Schedule of Performance, to develop the Property in such order and at such rate and at such time as OWNER deems appropriate within the exercise of OWNER's sole subjective business judgment, notwithstanding the adoption of an initiative after the Effective Date of this Agreement by CITY's electorate to the contrary. (g) Moratoria; Phasing of Development. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the Applicable Rules contemplate and provide for the phasing of the Development of 17 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT the Property, and that except as expressly provided in this Section 4, no initiative, referendum, moratorium, ordinance, resolution, or other Land Use Regulation or limitation on the conditioning, rate, timing or sequencing of the Development of the Property or any portion thereof shall apply to or govern the Development of the Property during the Term hereof whether affecting parcel or subdivision maps (whether tentative, vesting tentative, or final), building or site development plans or permits, occupancy permits, occupancy certificates or other entitlements to use to be approved, issued or granted by CITY. In the event of any such subsequent action, OWNER shall continue to be entitled to apply for and receive Subsequent Development Approvals in accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulations, subject only to the exercise of the Reservations of Authority set forth in Section 4.3 and other the terms of this Agreement. (h) Development Exactions. In addition to and not in limitation of the foregoing (except and subject to the Reservations of Authority), CITY shall not require any further Development Exactions for the Project except those provided for in this Agreement or which are provided for or required by or pursuant to the Existing Land Use Regulations (including, but not limited to the existing General Plan, the Development Plan, and Existing Development Approvals) which include, but are not limited to, Development Exactions that may be required by CITY in accordance with its current subdivision standards and policies. (i) Dedications/Conveyances/Acquisitions. At the appropriate points in the Development of the Project and in accordance with Exhibit D, OWNER shall convey or irrevocably offer to dedicate to CITY or its successor, assignee, or designee the Public Facilities, including streets, rights -of -way, park land and other improvements as more fully set forth in Exhibit D. (j) Expeditious Processing. CITY shall accept and timely process, in the normal and legal manner for processing such matters, all applications for future Ministerial Permits and Approvals, Discretionary Permits and Discretionary Action contemplated by, required under or necessary to affect the intent of this Agreement. Provided that the tentative tract map, parcel map and precise development plan and other applications are consistent with the Development Plan, CITY shall take final action on such applications within the time frames set forth in the Permit Streamlining Act, California Government Code Sections 65920 et seq. (as may be amended from time to time) unless an extension is agreed to by OWNER. (k) Subsequent Development Approvals. The Development Plan provides for CITY to process and consider subsequent discretionary approvals and permits for the Project, such as tentative subdivision maps, under the terms of the Existing Land Use Regulations. CITY acknowledges pursuant to Government Code Section 65865.2 that the conditions, terms, restrictions, and requirements for Subsequent Development Approvals processed with CITY for the Project shall not prevent development of the Property for the uses and to the density or intensity of development set forth in the Development Plan and in this Agreement. Upon approval, a Subsequent Development Approval shall become part of the Existing Land Use Regulations. (1) Amendments to Development Plan. The Parties anticipate that, from time to time, OWNER may request amendments to the Development Plan to respond to changing circumstances and conditions. CITY is under no obligation to approve any such application and may, in the exercise of its legislative discretion, approve, deny or propose conditions to or modifications in any such application by OWNER for an amendment to the Development Plan, including conditions or modifications that might otherwise be prohibited by the vested rights provided by this Agreement. OWNER will have a reasonable opportunity to review any such proposed conditions and modifications and withdraw its application for amendment to the Development Plan (in which case neither OWNER's proposed amendments In DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT nor CITY's proposed conditions or modifications will become effective). Any amendment to the Development Plan shall require an amendment to this Agreement in accordance with Government Code Section 65868. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties specifically acknowledge that a minor deviation or change to the Development Plan which qualifies as substantial conformance pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.8 of the Development Plan, or may qualify as an Insubstantial Modification pursuant to Section 9(a) of this Agreement, shall not be considered an amendment to the Development Plan. (m) Other Governmental Permits. Provided that OWNER pays the reasonable cost of such cooperation, CITY shall reasonably cooperate with OWNER in its efforts to obtain such additional permits and approvals by any other governmental or quasi -governmental agencies having jurisdiction over the Property, as long as such permits and approvals are consistent with this Agreement and with applicable regulatory requirements. CITY does not warrant or represent that any other governmental or quasi -governmental permits or approvals will be granted. (n) Mitigation Measures and Further Mitigation. In connection with the issuance of any Subsequent Development Approvals that are subject to review under CEQA, CITY shall not impose any Project alternatives or mitigation measures beyond those referenced in the Existing Development Approvals, which includes the Mitigation Measures, unless determined to be necessary or appropriate to comply with the CITY's CEQA obligations relating to future Discretionary Actions. The mitigation measures and mitigation monitoring plan set forth in the adopted Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program and EIR certified by CITY constitute additional benefits anticipated under this Agreement. The Mitigation Measures shall be enforced and monitored in the manner set forth in the Project Approvals. (o) Water Supply. Water supply for the Project has been the subject of the analysis required by Government Code Section 66473.7, Public Resources Code Section 21151.9 and Water Code Section 10631, et seq., and the reservoirs, pump stations and other facilities related to the provision of water to the Project are further described in the Development Plan and EIR. (p) Vested Rights. During the Term of this Agreement, OWNER is provided and assured the vested right to the maximum extent allowed under this Agreement to carry out the Development and use of the Property in accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulations as provided in this Section 4.1. (1) Project Entitlements/Density: OWNER is hereby granted the vested right to Development of the Project in accordance with this Agreement including, but not limited to, Existing Land Use Regulations and the Development Agreement Act. (2) Enforcement: Except to the extent this Agreement has been amended, modified, suspended or terminated in accordance with its terms, this Agreement shall be enforceable by either Party notwithstanding any change in any Applicable Rules. 4.2 Development of the Project, Planned Development OWNER shall construct the Project on the Property as a "planned development" as defined in California Civil Code Section 4175 (or successor provision) pursuant to the Davis -Stirling Act, which, among other requirements, shall require the recording by OWNER of a declaration (and may at OWNER'S discretion have multiple) declaration(s) of covenants, conditions, and restrictions ("CC&Rs") that, at a minimum, meets the requirements of a "declaration" as defined and described in the Davis -Stirling Act and to memorialize specified Conditions of Approval that 19 M DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT are part of the Project Approvals. OWNER shall provide to City, no less than ninety (90) days prior to the anticipated date of recording, a copy of the proposed final draft of CC&Rs to be recorded against the Property and any subsequent CC&Rs covering a portion of the Property for review and approval, not to be unreasonably withheld, by the City Manager and City Attorney. The Project shall have an "association" as defined and described in the Davis -Stirling Act, and may have multiple "associations" connected to the CC&Rs recorded against a portion of the Property as part of the Project. OWNER shall construct the Project on the Property only in accordance with the Project Approvals, with CC&Rs recorded against the Property and any portions thereof to memorialize specified Conditions of Approval that apply to the various portions of the Property pursuant to the Project Approvals. As depicted in the Project Approvals, as the same may be updated or amended from time to time consistent with the terms hereof, the Project shall primarily consist of a residential single-family development specifically developed and available for residential purposes, and may be the residents' primary residences or secondary residences, and/or may be used for short-term vacation rentals, with the following components: (a) Annual permitting fees to be consistent with the City's fee program; (b) Any rental or occupancy of thirty (30) nights or less to be subject to the City's then -current transient occupancy tax (TOT) for short-term vacation rentals; (c) Rental or occupancy agreements, and material renter or occupant information, shall be retained for a minimum of three (3) years (or other retention period as maybe approved by City policy or code) by the OWNER or OWNER's authorized management company for the short-term vacation rentals at the Site; (d) Subject to applicable federal or state law or regulation, occupancy in any residence, including residences used as short-term vacation rentals, shall be capped at two (2) persons per bedroom, plus one (1) person; provided, however, that there may be an increase in occupancy allowances for permitted short-term vacation rentals as set forth in the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations in effect as of the date of the issued permit, or, if the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations (or relevant provisions regarding occupancy allowances) are repealed for any reason, then the occupancy allowances for permitted short-term vacation rentals shall be the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations most recently in effect prior to being repealed and shall remain applicable for the balance of the Term of this Agreement; and (e) All residences at the Site shall allow for transient occupancy, which means occupancy for thirty (30) days or less. 4.3 Limitations, Reservations and Exceptions. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in Section 4.1 hereinabove or elsewhere in this Agreement, in addition to the Existing Land Use Regulations, only the following laws and regulations hereafter shall apply to and govern the Development and use of the Property ("Reservations of Authority"): 20 891 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT (a) Future Regulations. Future CITY Land Use Regulations that are not in conflict with the Applicable Rules or which, if in conflict with the Applicable Rules, have been consented to in writing by OWNER in connection with their application to the Development of the Property; (b) State and Federal Laws and Regulations. State and federal laws and regulations that conflict with the Applicable Rules or with OWNER'S vested rights set forth in this Agreement shall apply to the Development or use of the Property, together with any CITY ordinances, resolutions, regulations, and official policies necessary to enable CITY to comply with such overriding State and federal laws and regulations. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, (i) Owner does not waive its right to challenge or contest the validity of any State, federal, or local laws, regulations or official policies; and (ii) in the event that any State or federal law or regulation prevents or precludes compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement, the Parties agree to consider in good faith amending or suspending such provisions of this Agreement as may be necessary to comply with such State or federal laws, provided that no Parry shall be bound to approve any amendment to this Agreement unless this Agreement is amended in accordance with the procedures applicable to the adoption of development agreements as set forth in the Development Agreement Act and each Party retains full discretion with respect to such an approval. The City shall process any amendments required by this Section in a timely manner; (c) Public Health and Safety. Land Use Regulations that are adopted by CITY, which may be in conflict with the Applicable Rules, that are reasonably necessary in order to protect the public health and safety, so long as there is a reasonable relationship between the health and safety interest to be served by the adopted regulation and the nature and extent of the impairment of OWNER'S vested rights under this Agreement affected by said regulation. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, (i) Owner does not waive its right to challenge or contest the validity of any such Land Use Regulation adopted by CITY; and (ii) in the event that any such Land Use Regulation (or City ordinance, resolution or official policy undertaken pursuant thereto) prevents or precludes compliance with one or more provisions of this Agreement, the Parties agree to consider in good faith amending or suspending such provisions of this Agreement as may be necessary to comply with such Land Use Regulation, provided that no Party shall be bound to approve any amendment to this Agreement unless this Agreement is amended in accordance with the procedures applicable to the adoption of development agreements as set forth in the Development Agreement Act and each Party retains full discretion with respect to such an approval. The City shall process any amendments required by this Section in a timely manner; (d) Building and Improvement Standards. Present and future Building and Improvement Standards including those in the Uniform Codes, except that (taking into consideration the assurances to OWNER in this Section 4) any future amendment thereto that significantly reduces the amount of land within the Property that can be utilized for structures and improvements or significantly increases the amount of open space within the Project under the Development Plan shall not be considered a provision of any of the Building and Improvement Standards included within the exception provided by this Paragraph 4.3 (d) and shall not apply to and govern the Development of the Project unless it complies with another exception under this Section 4.3; (e) Taxes, Assessments, Fees and Charges. Subject to the provisions of Section 3.6 above, and consistent with the City's Reserved Powers, any and all taxes, assessments, fees and charges of any kind, including Impact Fees, Processing Fees, and payments of fees or money in lieu of a dedication of land that is otherwise a Development Exaction, shall be in the amounts set by the City at the time when such payment for such tax, assessment, fee or charge is due and payable to the City, such as upon the delivery by the OWNER to the City of 21 892 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT any application for a Subsequent Development Approval or issuance of a requested permit that constitutes a Subsequent Development Approval; and, (f) Full Extent of Law. The Parties acknowledge and agree that CITY is restricted in its authority to limit its police power by contract and that the foregoing limitations, reservations and exceptions are intended to reserve to CITY all of its police power that cannot be so limited. 4.4 Further Assurances to OWNER Regarding Exercise of Reservations of Authority. (a) Adoption of General Plan Amendment and Development Plan: EIR. In approving and adopting the Existing Development Approvals, CITY considered the health, safety and welfare of the existing and future residents and populations of the City and prepared in this regard the EIR and other environmental documentation, as well as an extensive traffic impact report and other studies. The Development Plan conforms in all respects to the development studied in and contemplated by the EIR, and this Agreement shall not authorize any development or project which was not studied in and contemplated by such EIR. (b) Acknowledgment Regarding Traffic, Future Traffic Policies and Traffic Levek (1) Incorporation of Project Traffic Generation in City Traffic Model and Traffic Study. The Parties acknowledge that the EIR contains a detailed transportation impact study that analyzes the future trips that will be generated by the Project ("Traffic Generation") and analyzes the extent to which such future Traffic Generation will affect the capacity of existing and planned future roads, freeways, freeway ramps, and intersections in the City and surrounding area ("Roadway Capacity Utilization"). CITY agrees that it will incorporate this Traffic Generation based on the trip generation rates in the EIR transportation impact analysis and Roadway Capacity Utilization based on maximum buildout under the Development Plan as part of CITY's next traffic and transportation model update, and that CITY will include these same assumptions in future traffic and transportation studies that CITY or any other private development project under CITY's jurisdiction may prepare regarding future development or roadway planning projects until all residential units authorized by the Existing Development Approvals have been constructed or this Agreement terminates, whichever comes first. (2) Incorporation of EIR Traffic and Transportation Assumptions in Future Plans and Studies. CITY agrees that OWNER has, through the construction of the traffic and transportation improvements specified in the EIR and Mitigation Measures adopted in conjunction with the Development Plan, satisfied the requirements of the Existing Land Use Regulations pertaining to the Specific Plan's Traffic Generation, as specifically noted in the EIR certified by CITY and the findings adopted by CITY. CITY also agrees that in conjunction with CITY's approval of future discretionary Subsequent Development Approvals, CITY shall not require OWNER to provide, construct, fully fund or fair -share fund additional roadway right-of- way, capacity or improvements beyond those required in the EIR and this Agreement so long as OWNER implements the Development Plan without substantial change and within the scope of the assumptions and development schedule identified in the EIR and the EIR traffic study. (3) CEQA; Changes in Project and Mitigation Requirements. The Parties acknowledge that CEQA may require additional environmental review for discretionary Subsequent Development Approvals. Further, CEQA may require additional mitigation to the extent that new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects occur as a result of significant new information or substantial changes in the Project or the circumstances surrounding the Project. (California 22 893 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT Public Resources Code Section 21166; CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code of Regs., Sections 15162 and 15183). Notwithstanding subsections (1) and (2) of this Section, OWNER shall be responsible for additional mitigation that may be required pursuant to CEQA to reduce significant impacts that result from substantial changes to the Development Plan requested by OWNER that require major revisions to the EIR, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines, 14 Cal. Code of Regs., Sectionl5162. CITY and OWNER may at any time mutually agree on changes to the mitigation requirements or project design features without amending this Agreement subject to compliance with the requirements of CEQA. 4.5 Regulation by other Public Agencies. The Parties acknowledge that (a) other public agencies not within the control of CITY possess authority to regulate aspects of the Development of the Property separately from or jointly with CITY and (b) this Agreement does not limit the authority of such other public agencies. 5. PERIODIC REVIEWS. 5.1 Annual Review. During the Term of this Agreement, at least once every twelve (12) month period from the Effective Date of this Agreement, CITY shall review the good faith compliance of OWNER with the terms of this Agreement ("Annual Review"). 5.2 Standards for Annual Review. During the Annual Review, OWNER shall be required to demonstrate good -faith compliance with the terms of this Agreement by submitting a performance report, if such report is requested by CITY. If CITY finds and determines in good faith that OWNER has not materially complied with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, then CITY may declare a default by OWNER in accordance with this Agreement. CITY may exercise its rights and remedies relating to any such event of default only after the period for curing a default as set forth in Section 11.2 has expired without cure of the default. 5.3 Certificate of Compliance. With respect to each year in which CITY approves OWNER's compliance with this Agreement, CITY shall, within thirty (30) days of receipt of written request from OWNER, provide OWNER with an Estoppel Certificate in accordance with Section 11.7 of this Agreement. 6. SHORT-TERM VACATION RENTALS/TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAXES. Subject to the terms of this Agreement and this Section 6, any owner of a separate legal residential lot on the Property as part of the Project, and on which that separate legal residential lot has a residential dwelling, shall have a vested right to use the residential dwelling on that 23 894 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT separate legal residential lot as a short-term vacation rental for the Term of this Agreement. All short-term vacation rentals shall be subject to the following: 6.1 Definition. As used in this Agreement, the term "short-term vacation rental" shall mean and refer to a "short-term vacation rental unit" as that term is defined in Section 3.25.030 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (or successor provision). 6.2 Short -Term Vacation Rental Use. Except as modified by this Article 6, all short-term vacation rentals shall comply with the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations in effect for the duration of the Term of this Agreement, including the penalties for violations. All short-term vacation rentals developed on the Property as part of the Project shall be permitted in accordance with the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations. No residential dwelling developed on the Property as part of the Project may be used for short-term vacation rental purposes unless the residential dwelling has a valid short-term vacation rental permit. If the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations (or any provisions therein) are repealed for any reason, then the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations (or applicable repealed provisions therein) that were most recently in effect prior to being repealed shall govern and shall remain applicable for the balance of the Term of this Agreement. For reference purposes only, the Short -Term Vacation Rental Regulations (Chapter 3.25 of the La Quinta Municipal Code) as it exists as of the Effective Date is attached as Exhibit G. 6.3 Compliance with other City Municipal Codes. Short-term vacation rental uses are subject to all provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code, including without limitation the City's noise compliance provisions set forth in Sections 9.100.210 and 11.08.040 (or successor provisions) of the La Quinta Municipal Code, and the transient occupancy tax (TOT) provisions set forth in Chapter 3.24 (or successor chapter of provisions) of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 6.4 Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions. OWNER shall execute and record or cause to be recorded in the Recorder's Office, against the Property and each separate legal residential parcel subdivided pursuant to Tentative Map 37387 and any Future Tract Maps, a declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (in a form approved by the City Manager and City Attorney prior to its recording), which shall run with the land, and shall be binding upon, and place on notice, any and all owners of the separate legal residential lots of the requirements set forth in this Section 6. The declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall expressly provide that short-term vacation rentals are an allowed use for every residential dwelling within Project (i.e., within the homeowner's association subject to the declaration). The requirements of this Section 6.4 may be satisfied by including the terms and conditions required herein in the CC&Rs required to be recorded pursuant to Section 4.2 of this Agreement. 7. TRANSFERS AND ASSIGNMENTS; TERMINATION UPON LOT SALE. 7.1 Transfer and Assignments of Rijzhts and Interests. (a) Rights and Interests Appurtenant. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, the rights and interests conveyed and provided herein to OWNER benefit and are appurtenant to the Property. OWNER has the right to sell, assign and transfer any and all of its rights and interests and to delegate any and all of its duties and obligations hereunder; 24 895 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT provided, however, that such rights and interests may not be transferred or assigned except in strict compliance with the following conditions: (1) Said rights and interests may be transferred or assigned only together with and as an incident of the transfer and assignment of the portions of the Property to which they relate, including any transfer or assignment pursuant to any foreclosure of a Mortgage or a deed in lieu of such foreclosure; (2) In connection with the transfer or assignment by OWNER of all or any portion of the Property (other than a transfer or assignment by OWNER to a "Mortgagee" pursuant to Section 14, or to an "Affiliated Parry" or a "Non -Assuming Transferee" as defined in Section 7.3 below), OWNER and the Transferee shall enter into a written agreement in a form that substantially complies with the provisions in Section 7.1(a)(4) below, and to be recorded in the Recorder's Office (an "Assignment and Assumption Agreement") regarding the respective interests, rights and obligations of OWNER and the Transferee in and under the Project Approvals. Such Assignment and Assumption Agreement may: (i) release OWNER from obligations under the Project Approvals (including this Agreement) pertaining to that portion of the Property being transferred, as described in the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, provided that the Transferee expressly assumes such obligations; (ii) transfer to the Transferee vested rights to improve that portion of the Property and Project being transferred; and (iii) address any other matter deemed by OWNER to be necessary or appropriate in connection with the transfer or assignment; (3) Except as provided in Section 7.3 below, OWNER shall obtain CITY's prior written consent to any Assignment and Assumption Agreement, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. CITY may refuse to give its consent only if, in light of the proposed Transferee's reputation and financial resources, such Transferee would not in CITY's reasonable discretion be able to perform the obligations proposed to be assumed by such Transferee. Such determination shall be made by the City Manager in consultation with the City Attorney and is appealable by OWNER directly to the City Council. (4) An Assignment and Assumption Agreement shall be binding on OWNER, CITY and the Transferee provided (i) OWNER is not then in default under this Agreement, (ii) OWNER has provided notice to CITY of such transfer, and CITY has approved the transfer, and (iii) the Transferee executes and delivers to CITY a written agreement in which (a) the name and address of the Transferee is set forth and (b) the Transferee expressly and unconditionally assumes each and every obligation of OWNER under this Agreement with respect to the Property, or portion thereof, being transferred (to the extent OWNER has not retained a continuing obligation), (c) OWNER no longer has any legal or equitable interest in the Property or the portion thereof sold or transferred, as applicable, and (d) CITY has satisfied itself of Transferee's ability to assume those OWNER obligations under this Agreement being assigned. Upon recordation of any Assignment and Assumption Agreement in the Recorder's Office in compliance with this Agreement, OWNER shall be released from those obligations assumed by the Transferee therein. (5) OWNER shall be free from any and all liabilities accruing on or after the date of any assignment or transfer with respect to those obligations assumed by a Transferee pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement entered into and recorded pursuant to this Agreement. No breach or default hereunder by any person succeeding to any portion of OWNER's obligations under this Agreement shall be attributed to OWNER, nor may OWNER's rights hereunder be canceled or diminished in any way by any breach or default by any such person following OWNER's release of obligations under the Project Approvals pursuant to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement assigning OWNER's obligations to that Transferee in accordance with this Agreement. 25 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT Any attempt to assign or transfer any right or interest in this Agreement except in strict compliance with this Section 7, shall be null and void and of no force and effect. (b) Subject to Terms of Agreement. Following any such assignment or transfer of any of the rights and interests of OWNER under this Agreement, the exercise, use and enjoyment thereof shall continue to be subject to the terms of this Agreement to the same extent as if the Transferee were OWNER. The Transferee of any of the rights and interests of OWNER shall take said rights and interests subject to this Agreement and shall perform the duties and obligations of OWNER. (c) Assignment and Assumption of OWNER's Obligations. In connection with a transfer or assignment of rights and interests pursuant to Section 7.1(a) above, OWNER may enter into a written agreement with the transferee regarding the respective rights and obligations of OWNER and the transferee under this Agreement, including without limitation, provisions that purport to release OWNER from specified rights and obligations under this Agreement that relate to the transferred Property, provided that the transferee expressly assumes all such rights and obligations. OWNER shall have the right but not the obligation to deliver to CITY a fully executed Assignment and Assumption Agreement between OWNER and the transferee pursuant to which OWNER shall assign and delegate to the transferee, and the transferee shall accept, assume and agree to perform all of the OWNER's Obligations under this Agreement that are allocable to the transferred Property (the "Assignment and Assumption Agreement"). Notwithstanding the foregoing, OWNER shall not be released from OWNER's Obligations unless and until CITY consents in writing to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed as provided in Subsection (d) below. If OWNER fails to seek CITY's consent or CITY fails to consent to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement in the manner set forth in Subsection (d) below, then OWNER may nevertheless transfer to the transferee any and all rights and obligations relating to the transferred Property arising under this Agreement; however, with respect to CITY, OWNER shall not be released with respect to such OWNER's Obligations. In the event CITY unreasonably withholds, conditions or delays any consent to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, as prohibited by Subsection (d) below, then OWNER may nevertheless transfer to the transferee any and all rights and obligations relating to the transferred Property arising under this Agreement and, with respect to CITY, OWNER shall be released with respect to such OWNER's Obligations. (d) Release of OWNER. Except to the extent OWNER is in default under this Agreement prior to the transfer, then CITY will review and consider promptly any request by OWNER for CITY's consent to an Assignment and Assumption Agreement. Upon the written consent of CITY to the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed, OWNER shall be relieved of its legal duty to perform the assigned obligations of this Agreement set forth in such assumption. The withholding of CITY's consent to any such Assignment and Assumption Agreement shall be deemed reasonable only if, in light of the proposed transferee's reputation, experience and financial resources, such transferee would not in CITY's reasonable opinion be able to perform the obligations proposed to be assumed by such transferee. CITY's consent to any such Assignment and Assumption Agreement shall be deemed unreasonably conditioned under circumstances where CITY seeks to impose conditions, standards or requirements on the transferee that are more stringent than what has been imposed on OWNER under this Agreement. CITY's consent to any such Assignment and Assumption Agreement shall be deemed unreasonably delayed under circumstances where CITY does not provide its consent within [ten (10)] business days after receipt of the Assignment and Assumption Agreement. (e) Effect of Noncompliance. From and after the CITY's consent to the assumption of obligations under this Agreement by a transferee pursuant to this Section, 26 897 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT noncompliance by any such transferee with the assumed terms and conditions of this Agreement shall entitle CITY to pursue any and all of its rights under this Agreement against such transferee; but, such noncompliance shall not be deemed a default or grounds for termination hereof with respect to, or constitute cause for CITY to initiate enforcement action against, other persons then owning or holding interests in the Property or any portion thereof and not themselves in default hereunder. Similarly, noncompliance by OWNER with respect to any terms and conditions of this Agreement not assumed by such transferee shall entitle CITY to pursue against OWNER any and all of CITY's rights under this Agreement as to obligations retained by OWNER, but such noncompliance by OWNER shall not be deemed a default or grounds for termination hereof with respect to, or constitute cause for CITY to initiate enforcement action against, such transferee or other persons then owning or holding interests in the Property or any portion thereof and not themselves in default hereunder. (f) Rights of Successors and Assigns. Any and all successors (including without limitation, those successors acquiring their interests in the Property and this Agreement by merger, consolidation, stock sale, pledge, corporate reorganization or other conveyance by business arrangement) and assigns of OWNER shall have all of the same rights, benefits and obligations of OWNER under this Agreement, to the extent acquired as part of the Property or permitted in this Section or both. 7.2 Termination of Agreement Upon Sale of Lots to Public. Subject to meeting the requirements as Non -Assuming Transferees in Section 7.3 below, this Agreement shall terminate with respect to any individual residential lot, and such lot shall be released from and shall no longer be subject to this Agreement (without the execution or recordation of any further document or the taking of any further action). The Parties shall cooperate, at no cost to the non -requesting Party, in executing in recordable form any document that either Party (including any successor to the title of OWNER in and to any of the said lots) may submit to confirm the termination of this Agreement as to any such lot. Even if all of the lots in the Project are sold, and this Agreement is terminated with respect to each of such lots, this Agreement shall remain in effect and be binding upon CITY and OWNER. 7.3 Transfers to Affiliated Parties and Non -Assuming Transferees. (a) Affiliated Parties. OWNER, or any "Affiliated Party" of OWNER, may at any time and without City's prior written consent, transfer all or any portion of its rights and obligations under this Agreement to any "Affiliated Party" of such transferor and, in connection with the transfer of any such obligations, be released from such obligations; provided, however, that OWNER and the Affiliated Party duly execute (in recordable form) an Assignment and Assumption Agreement in a form approved by the City, and OWNER deliver said agreement to the CITY to ensure, among other terms and conditions, the CITY has the current address and notice information for any Affiliated Party that assumes all or any portion of OWNER's rights and obligations under this Agreement. Any Assignment and Assumption Agreement between OWNER and any Affiliated Party(ies) shall be recorded in the Recorder's Office upon complete execution by the parties thereto after approval of the form by the City. As used herein, the term "Affiliated Party" shall mean any entity that owns fifty-one percent (51 %) or a controlling interest, or both, in OWNER. The CITY shall have the right to request and review any and all articles of incorporation, bylaws, operating agreements, and other related governing documents of any Affiliated Party to confirm compliance with the requirements of this Section. (b) Non -Assuming Transferees. Except as otherwise required by OWNER, in OWNER's sole discretion, the burdens, obligations and duties of OWNER under this Agreement shall terminate with respect to: (i) any single residential lot conveyed to a purchaser, or (ii) any property that has been established as one or more separate legal parcels and 27 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT conveyed for open space, park, or similar nonresidential/noncommercial uses. Neither an Assignment and Assumption Agreement nor City's consent shall be required in connection with clauses (i) and (ii) in the preceding sentence as long as OWNER continues to assume obligations with respect to the portion that is transferred, or can otherwise demonstrate bonds and/or other financial security will satisfy these obligations, and in such case the Transferee in such a transaction and its successors ("Non Assuming Transferees") shall be deemed to have no obligations under this Agreement (except for obligations which extend to the individual units, single residential parcels, and any other parcels or property subject to CC&Rs, which implement this Agreement). As to any single residential lot containing a residential dwelling within the Project, this Agreement shall terminate, and OWNER shall have no obligations with respect to that single residential lot upon the issuance by the City of a certificate of occupancy for the dwelling and the close of escrow of the initial sale of that dwelling, save and except only those rights and obligations expressly stated in this Agreement to survive termination. Nothing in this section shall exempt any property transferred to a Non -Assuming Transferee from payment of applicable taxes, assessments, fees and charges, or for compliance with applicable conditions of approval. 8. TERM OF AGREEMENT. 8.1 Term. The term of this Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and, except as set forth in Section 7.2, shall continue for fifty (50) years thereafter (the "Term"), unless this Agreement is (a) terminated as provided in Sections 11 and 12, or (b) modified or cancelled by mutual written consent of the Parties as provided in Section 9. 8.2 Rights and Duties Following Termination (a) In General. Upon the termination of this Agreement, no Party shall have any further right or obligation hereunder except with respect to (i) any obligations required to have been performed prior to said termination, (ii) the indemnification provisions of Section 12, and (iii) any default in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement that has occurred prior to said termination. (b) Survival of Terms. In the event that this Agreement is terminated for any reason other than the default of OWNER, the rights and duties of the Parties shall be as set forth in Section 8.2(a), except that CITY acknowledges in connection with certain fee programs, OWNER may have participated financially in excess of OWNER's pro rata share in the cost of the Public Facilities, in which case CITY shall endeavor to cause other benefited undeveloped lands and owners thereof to be identified, and CITY shall, to the extent feasible, attempt to require such other landowners to reimburse to OWNER, through CITY, that portion of such costs incurred by OWNER in excess of its pro rata share (as reasonably determined by CITY) that has not been previously reimbursed by CITY or a Financing District. OWNER acknowledges that CITY may be limited in the manner in which it may collect or require such reimbursement and that CITY may be unable to cause OWNER to be reimbursed for such costs. 9. AMENDMENT OR MODIFICATION TO THIS AGREEMENT. Subject to the provisions of Section 10, and except as expressly stated to the contrary herein, this Agreement may be amended or cancelled only by the mutual written consent of the Parties consistent with Government Code Section 65867-65868 (or successor provisions), the Development Agreement Ordinance, and the following terms: DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT (a) Insubstantial Modifications. The Parties acknowledge that refinements and further development of the Project may demonstrate that minor changes are appropriate with respect to the details of the Project development and the performance of the parties under this Agreement. The parties desire to retain a certain degree of flexibility with respect to the details of the Project development and with respect to those items covered in general terms under this Agreement, and thus desire to provide a streamlined method of approving insubstantial modifications to this Agreement. Therefore, any minor modification to this Agreement which does not modify (i) the Term of this Agreement; (ii) permitted uses of the Site, (iii) maximum density or intensity of use, except as specifically allowed in the Specific Plan, (iv) provisions for the reservation or dedication of land, (v) conditions, terms, restrictions or requirements for Subsequent Discretionary Actions, or (vi) monetary obligations of either OWNER or CITY (hereinafter an "Insubstantial Modification"), and that can be processed under CEQA as exempt from CEQA, or with the preparation of an Addendum to the EIR, and that does not require a public hearing prior to the parties executing a modification to this Agreement. Either Party may propose an Insubstantial Modification, consent to which shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed by the other Parry. Consent shall be deemed unreasonably withheld, conditioned, or delayed where the other Party does not provide its consent within thirty (30) days. Upon the written request of OWNER for a modification to this Agreement, the City Manager or designee shall determine, in the CITY Manager's sole discretion but not to be unreasonably withheld: (1) whether the requested modification constitutes an "Insubstantial Modification," as defined herein; (2) whether the requested modification is consistent with Applicable Rules (other than that portion of this Agreement sought to be modified); and (3) whether the requested modification tends to promote the goals of this Agreement. If the CITY Manager or designee determines that the requested modification is an "Insubstantial Modification" that is consistent with Applicable Rules and tends to promote the goals of this Agreement, the proposed modification will be approved by the CITY as an Insubstantial Modification, and a written modification will be executed by the Parties, recorded in the Recorder's Office, and attached to this Agreement. Any such Insubstantial Modification shall not be deemed an "amendment" to this Agreement under Government Code Section 65858. (b) Substantial Amendments. Except as otherwise described in Section 9(a) of this Agreement, amendments to this Agreement shall be "Substantial Amendments" which require notice and a public hearing pursuant to California Government Code Section 65868. (c) Incorporation of Insubstantial Modifications into Agreement. City approval of (1) Insubstantial Modifications to a Project Approval, as defined in Section 9(a) of this Agreement, in conformity with Applicable Rules and this Agreement, shall not require a modification or amendment to this Agreement and shall automatically be deemed to be incorporated into the Project and vested under this Agreement. Likewise, City approval of any Insubstantial Modification to any Exhibit to this Agreement shall not require a modification or amendment to this Agreement and shall automatically be deemed to be incorporated into this Agreement and vested hereunder. 29 ox DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT (d) Parties Required to Amend. Where a portion of OWNER's rights or obligations have been transferred, assigned, and assumed pursuant to Section 7 of this Agreement, the signature of the person or entity to whom such rights or obligations have been assigned shall not be required to amend this Agreement unless such amendment would materially alter the rights or obligations of such Transferee hereunder. In no event shall the signature or consent of any Non -Assuming Transferee be required to amend this Agreement. 10. PROCESSING OF REQUESTS AND APPLICATIONS. Upon completion by OWNER of all required preliminary actions and payment of processing fees, if any, CITY shall proceed to process and check all applications for the Development of the Project within the times set forth in the Permit Streamlining Act (Government Code Section 65920 et seq.), the Subdivision Map Act (Government Code Section 66410 et seq.), and other applicable provisions of law, as the same may be amended from time to time. Notwithstanding the foregoing, as provided in Section 4, no subsequently adopted Land Use Regulation (including, without limitation, any moratorium or other phasing of development) shall be applicable to and shall delay the acceptance or processing of any such application except in strict accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulations or Land Use Regulations adopted by CITY pursuant to the Reservations of Authority. As provided above, the standards applied in approving or disapproving such applications shall be as set forth in the Existing Land Use Regulations, subject to the Reservations of Authority. 11. DEFAULT, REMEDIES AND ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATES. Unless canceled as provided herein, or modified or suspended pursuant to Government Code Section 65869.5 or terminated pursuant to this Section, this Agreement is enforceable according to its terms by either Parry hereto. 11.1 Remedies in General. (a) The Parties acknowledge that CITY would not have entered into this Agreement if it were to be liable in monetary damages of any kind whatsoever under or with respect to this Agreement, Project Approvals, or the application of any matters relating to any rights vested by virtue of this Agreement. As such, the Parties agree that declaratory and injunctive relief, mandate, and specific performance shall be OWNER'S sole and exclusive judicial remedies against CITY with respect to enforcement of the terms, provisions and conditions of this Agreement. (b) CITY shall not be liable for any monetary damages to OWNER, or to any Transferee of OWNER or any other person or entity, and OWNER covenants not to sue or bring any proceeding against CITY for any monetary damages, or claim any monetary damages against CITY, including but not limited to: (1) any breach of, or which arises out of, this Agreement; (2) the taking, impairment or restriction of any right or interest conveyed or provided under this Agreement or pursuant hereto, including but not limited to claims for loss of use, pre -condemnation or condemnation damages, regulatory or actual taking of real property, severance damages, lost profits, and/or diminution in value of the Property or any portion thereof, or for any delay or inability of OWNER to develop or use the Property or any portion thereof arising under this Agreement; 30 901 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT (3) damages arising out of or connected with any dispute, controversy or issue regarding the application or interpretation or effect of the provisions of this Agreement, the Project Approvals, the Applicable Rules, or any future amendments or enactments thereto, or the Project, or any Development Approvals sought in connection with the Development of the Project or any component thereof, or use of a parcel or any portion thereof, and (4) Development and Development -related activities, including construction of improvements by OWNER or OWNER's contractors or subcontractors, on the Property or any portion thereof. (c) Notwithstanding the above, OWNER may be entitled to an award of attorney's fees pursuant to Section 15.9 of this Agreement. 11.2 Termination of Agreement for Default by OWNER. CITY may terminate this Agreement by written notice to OWNER for any failure of OWNER to perform any material duty or obligation of OWNER under, or to comply in good faith with the terms and conditions of, this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "default"); provided however, CITY may terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section only after providing written notice to OWNER of the default setting forth the nature of the default and the actions, if any, required by OWNER to cure such default and, where the default can be cured, OWNER has failed to take such actions and cure such default within thirty (30) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such 30-day period but can be cured within a longer time, has failed to commence within such 30-day period the actions necessary to bring itself into compliance and to pursue diligently such steps to completion. 11.3 Termination of Agreement for Default by CITY. OWNER may terminate this Agreement by written notice to CITY for any default by CITY under this Agreement after written notice to CITY advising of the nature of default by CITY and, where the default can be cured, CITY has failed to take such actions and cure such default within thirty (30) days after the effective date of such notice or, in the event that such default cannot be cured within such 30-day period but can be cured within a longer time, has failed to commence within such 30-day period the actions necessary to bring itself into compliance and to pursue diligently such steps to completion. 11.4 Termination by OWNER Prior to First Bond Sale. Provided that OWNER is not in material default under this Agreement and notwithstanding any provisions in this Agreement to the contrary, OWNER shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by providing written notice to CITY in the event that OWNER reasonably determines, prior to the first sale of Bonds by any Financing District formed by CITY after Request by OWNER pursuant to Section 3.2 of this Agreement, that Development of the Project will not meet the Economic Expectations of OWNER and/or has become economically infeasible due to changed market conditions, increased Development costs, conditions to future discretionary approvals imposed by governmental entities, or similar factors. In the event of any such termination by OWNER, OWNER acknowledges that CITY may, in its discretion, restore the General Plan and other Land Use Regulations of the Property to the condition that existed prior to the adoption of the Existing Development Approvals. OWNER shall deliver to CITY no later than one hundred twenty (120) days prior to the anticipated City approval date, at a noticed public meeting of the City Council, for the first sale of Bonds by a Financing District written notice of OWNER's determination whether to exercise its option to termination this Agreement under this Section 11.4, and, if OWNER does not timely deliver said notice to CITY, or OWNER does not expressly terminate this Agreement by reference to this Section in said notice, then OWNER shall 31 902 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT be deemed to have elected not to terminate this Agreement, and the first sale of Bonds by the Financing District may proceed to closing. In no event shall OWNER have the right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Section 11.4 (a) after the first sale of Bonds by a Financing District, or (b) within 120 days of and on the actual City approval date, at a noticed public meeting of the City Council, for the first sale of Bonds by the Financing District. Upon sale and issuance of any Bonds by any Financing District, OWNER (and any Transferee of OWNER) shall have the obligation for payment of the Bonds pursuant to the CFD, CFD Policy, and any other applicable laws and contractual requirements arising from the sale and issuance of the Bonds. Notwithstanding anything in this Section or Section 12.2 to the contrary, the termination of this Agreement shall not occur if the first sale and issuance of Bonds by a CFD occurs prior to OWNER exercising its rights pursuant to this Section 11.4, and OWNER shall have no right to terminate this Agreement for any second or subsequent sale of Bonds by a CFD formed by CITY after Request by OWNER pursuant to Section 3.2 of this Agreement. 11.5 Specific Performance. The Parties acknowledge that monetary damages and remedies at law generally are inadequate due, in part, to the size, nature and scope of the Project, it will not be practical or possible to restore the Property to its natural condition once implementation of this Agreement has begun and specific performance is a particularly appropriate remedy for the enforcement of this Agreement and should be available to both Parties based on the following reasons and facts: (a) the unavailability of monetary damages against CITY provided in Section 11.1 above; (b) OWNER's Obligations provided for in this Agreement were bargained for by CITY and given in return for assurances by CITY to OWNER regarding the Existing Land Use Regulations (except as specified to the contrary herein, including the City's Reservations of Authority) applicable to the Development of the Property, which assurances were in turn relied upon by OWNER in undertaking OWNER's Obligations; (c) Due to the size, nature and scope of the Project, it may not be practical or possible to restore the Property to its natural condition once implementation of this Agreement has begun; after such implementation, OWNER may be prevented from other choices it may have had to utilize the Property, or portions thereof, and to provide other benefits to CITY. OWNER has invested significant time and resources and performed extensive planning and processing of the Project in agreeing to the terms of this Agreement and will be investing even more significant time and resources in implementing the Project in reliance upon the terms of this Agreement, and it is not possible to determine the sums of money that would adequately compensate OWNER for such efforts; (d) The inability of OWNER to recover and receive back its capital investment in the Public Facilities to be provided to CITY as part of OWNER's Obligations and to re -plan and provide for different uses of the Property once such facilities and infrastructure have been completed; and, (e) The use of the Property for the purposes and uses described in the Development Plan is unique. Further, the Parties acknowledge that for the reasons set forth above (particularly because of the lack of monetary damages available to OWNER), in connection with any judicial proceeding regarding the performance of this Agreement, rights, or the interests and duties of the Parties hereunder, it is appropriate for, and the Parties shall cooperate in requesting (whether by 32 903 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT stipulations or otherwise) the court to proceed expeditiously and to retain jurisdiction until the underlying conflict or dispute has been fully resolved. 11.6 Appointment of Referee. A Party initiating legal action hereunder may request that such action be heard by a referee appointed by the Riverside County Superior Court pursuant to the reference procedures of California Code of Civil Procedure Section 638 et seq. OWNER and CITY, in such case, shall use their best efforts to agree upon a single referee who shall then try all issues, whether of fact or law, and report a finding and judgment thereon and issue all legal and equitable relief, as permitted pursuant to this Agreement and appropriate under the circumstances of the controversy. The referee shall be a retired judge from either the California Superior Court, the California Court of Appeal, the California Supreme Court, the United States District Court or the United States Court of Appeals with significant and recent experience in resolving land use and real property disputes. If OWNER and CITY are unable to agree upon a referee within ten (10) days of a written request to do so by any Party, any Party may seek to have a referee appointed pursuant to Section 640 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. The cost and fees of such proceeding including the referee's fees and the court reporter's fees (exclusive of the attorney's fees and cost of the Parties) shall be borne equally by the Parties; provided, however, that the costs and fees for such proceeding, including any initiation fee, shall be ultimately borne in accordance with Section 15.9 of this Agreement. Any referee selected pursuant to this Section shall be considered a temporary judge appointed pursuant to Article 6, Section 21 of the California Constitution. The statement of decision of the referee shall be binding upon the parties, and upon filing of the statement of decision with the clerk of the court (or with the judge where there is no clerk), judgment may be entered thereon in the same manner as if the action had been tried by the court. The decision of the referee shall be appealable as if rendered by the court. In the event that an alternative method of resolving disputes concerning the application, enforcement or interpretation of development agreements is provided by legislative or judicial action after the Effective Date, the Parties may, by mutual agreement, select such alternative method. 11.7 Estoppel Certificates. Either Party may at any time deliver written notice to the other Party requesting an estoppel certificate (the "Estoppel Certificate") stating: (a) The Agreement is in full force and effect and is a binding obligation of the Parties; (b) The Agreement has not been amended or modified either orally or in writing or, if so amended, identifying the amendments (including Substantial Amendments and Insubstantial Modifications); (c) That there has been no default in the performance of the requesting Party's obligations under the Agreement or, if a default does exist, the nature and amount of any default. A Party receiving a request for an Estoppel Certificate shall provide a signed certificate to the requesting Party within thirty (30) days after receipt of the request. The City Manager may sign Estoppel Certificates on behalf of CITY, subject to review by the City Clerk and City Attorney. Any officer of OWNER may sign on behalf of OWNER. An Estoppel Certificate may be relied on by Transferees and Mortgagees of OWNER. In the event that OWNER requests an Estoppel Certificate from CITY, OWNER may be required reimburse CITY for all reasonable and direct costs and fees incurred by CITY with respect thereto, including reasonable attorneys' fees for researching, preparing, and issuing an Estoppel Certificate. 33 904 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 12. THIRD PARTY LITIGATION. 12.1 Indemnification. OWNER shall indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless CITY, its agents, elected officials, officers, employees and independent consultants from and against any third parry claim, cause of action, administrative or judicial proceeding or enforcement action of any kind ("Third Party Claim") and all costs and expenses incurred therewith subject to the limitations of this Section 12, that (a) alleges or results in any loss, liability, damage, compensation, fine, penalty, order, judgment, remedial action or requirement arising from the acts, omissions or operations of OWNER or OWNER's agents, contractors, subcontractors and employees pursuant to this Agreement, including but not limited to the failure or alleged failure to pay prevailing wages for any Public Works constructed by or under the direction of OWNER or OWNER's contractors and/or subcontractors pursuant to Section 3.3(c) above; or (b) seeks to attack, challenge, set aside, void, or annul the certification of the EIR, this Agreement or the ordinance approving this Agreement, any and all Project Approvals, the formation of the CFD or issuance of bonds thereunder, the dedication or conveyance of Potential Public Properties or Public Facilities pursuant to this Agreement, or any Subsequent Development Approvals. Notwithstanding the above, OWNER's obligations under the preceding sentence shall not apply to Third Party Claims arising solely from (i) the intentional wrongful acts or willful misconduct of CITY or (ii) CITY's breach of its obligations under this Agreement. With regard to alleged or actual failure to pay prevailing wages, OWNER, in giving this indemnification, acknowledges the provisions of California Labor Code Section 1781 and specifically waives any protection, rights or claims against CITY that may accrue to OWNER pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1781. Nothing in this Section 12.1 shall be construed to relieve contractors or subcontractors of OWNER from their respective obligations to comply with applicable prevailing wage and labor laws. 12.2 Option to Terminate. If, prior to the Vesting Date, a Third Party Claim is timely filed challenging any of the Project Site Development Permits, or, if, within the time periods for the filing of lawsuits, a Third Party Claim is timely filed challenging (i) the formation of a CFD, (ii) the Financing District's approval of the first sale of Bonds by a CFD, or (iii) a sale, dedication or conveyance of any Potential Public Properties or Public Facilities which sale, dedication or conveyance occurs within the time period for filing a lawsuit challenging the Finance District's approval of the first sale of those Bonds to finance said sale, dedication, or conveyance, then the Parties shall meet and confer concerning the potential impact of the Third Party Claim on this Agreement and the Development of the Project. Within thirty (30) days of such meeting, if OWNER determines that such Third Party Claim may have an unacceptable adverse impact on the Project, OWNER' rights under this Agreement, or OWNER's reasonable investment -based Economic Expectations in connection with the Project, OWNER may in its reasonable discretion terminate this Agreement by sending the CITY a written notice of such termination, and the Parties shall thereafter be relieved of any further obligations under this Agreement but subject to the OWNER's obligations that survive any termination of this Agreement. OWNER acknowledges and agrees that if this Agreement is terminated by OWNER, CITY shall have no obligation to defend against such Third Party Claim and, at CITY's discretion, may restore the General Plan and other Land Use Regulations for the Property to the conditions that existed prior to the adoption of the Existing Development Approvals. If OWNER terminates this Agreement pursuant to this Section 12.2, OWNER shall undertake all actions as are reasonable or necessary in order to have the Third Party Claim dismissed or otherwise finally resolved by entry of final judgment and decision on any appeals, and, (a) to the extent that CITY incurs any costs or attorneys' fees in assisting OWNER in having the Third Party Claim dismissed or otherwise decided, or (b) if OWNER fails to have such claim dismissed or otherwise decided, and CITY incurs any costs or attorneys' fees in having such claim dismissed or otherwise decided, OWNER shall be responsible for all reasonable legal expenses of 34 905 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT CITY, including court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees, incurred by CITY in so doing. Notwithstanding anything in this Section or Section 11.4 to the contrary, the termination of this Agreement shall not occur if the first sale and issuance of Bonds by a CFD occurs prior to the dismissal or other resolution of any Third Party Claim challenging either the first sale of Bonds by a CFD or a sale, dedication or conveyance of any Potential Public Properties or Public Facilities which sale, dedication or conveyance is financed by that first sale of those Bonds. Furthermore, and notwithstanding any provisions in this Section or Section 11.4 to the contrary, OWNER's indemnification and duty to defend obligations to the CITY in this Agreement, including in Section 12.1 and 12.3, shall survive any termination of this Agreement. 12.3 Defense of Third -Party Claims. In the event of a Third -Party Claim, and if OWNER does not elect to terminate this Agreement pursuant to its rights under Section 12.2, OWNER shall defend CITY against the Third -Parry Claim at OWNER's expense with legal counsel reasonably approved by CITY; provided, however, that CITY may, in its discretion and upon notice to OWNER, select the legal counsel if OWNER is in default under this Agreement. With respect to any Third -Party Claim, if OWNER asks CITY to participate in the defense of that Third Parry Claim, CITY shall participate and fully cooperate in a timely manner in the defense of said Third Party Claim. Even if not requested to do so, CITY may elect to participate in the defense of any Third -Party Claim. In either circumstance, CITY may select legal counsel reasonably approved by OWNER to represent CITY in the defense of such Third -parry Claim and OWNER shall reimburse CITY for the reasonable costs and fees of that defense. 12.4 Cooperation and Cost Control. Within ten (10) days after receiving or being notified of a Third -Parry Claim, CITY shall notify OWNER of same. The Parties shall, in timely manner, fully cooperate with each other and their respective counsel (if CITY has retained counsel pursuant to Section 12.2 or 12.3 above) in defending against any Third -Parry Claim, including the preparation of any applicable administrative record, the coordination of pleadings and briefs filed in the course of litigation, and the control of costs, expenses, and fees incurred in defending against the Third -Party Claim. Among other reasonable means of controlling litigation costs, expenses and fees, in any action involving a Third -Party Claim for which OWNER is indemnifying CITY and OWNER is not in default under this Agreement, counsel for OWNER may be deemed lead counsel and counsel for CITY (if CITY has retained counsel pursuant to Section 12.2 or 12.3 above) shall make a good faith effort to avoid duplication of legal services and of other costs and expenses. The Parties shall cooperate in the preparation of any required administrative record in a reasonable and cost- effective manner and shall consult with each other in good faith to ensure that unnecessary costs are not incurred in defending against a Third -Party Claim. So long as OWNER is not in default under this Agreement, CITY shall not enter into a settlement agreement as to any Third -Parry Claim or otherwise compromise the defense of same without OWNER's written consent. OWNER shall also have the right, subject to CITY's consent not to be unreasonably withheld or delayed, to settle any such Third Party Claim, provided that OWNER may not settle such claim on terms that would reduce any of CITY's rights under this Agreement or constitute an amendment or modification of this Agreement, the Existing Land Use Regulations, or the Development Plan, unless such amendment or modification is approved in advance by CITY in accordance with applicable legal requirements, and CITY reserves its full legislative discretion with respect to making such an approval. 12.5 No Recourse for Inability to Perform Due to Judicial Determinations. CITY shall have no liability for general, special, or compensatory damages to OWNER, nor may the performance of CITY be compelled by OWNER (or any successor or assignee or 35 M DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT Transferee of OWNER) for any failure of CITY to perform under this Agreement, or for the inability of OWNER to develop the Property as contemplated by the Development Plan and Schedule of Performance, which failure to perform or inability to develop is the result of a judicial determination that this Agreement, the General Plan, the Existing Development Approvals, or any Subsequent Development Approvals are invalid or inadequate or not in compliance with law, or that this Agreement or any of CITY's actions in adopting it were invalid, inadequate, or not in compliance with law. Notwithstanding the provisions of this Section 12.5, OWNER shall have the right to obtain a refund or return of any deposit made with CITY or fees paid to CITY in connection with the Development of the Project or other payments made under this Agreement to the extent that such deposit or fees or other payments have not been used by CITY in connection with its review or other actions related to the Project. 13. EFFECT OF AGREEMENT ON TITLE. 13.1 Covenants Run With the Land. (a) Subject to the provisions of Sections 7 and 13 of this Agreement: (1) All of the provisions, agreements, rights, powers, standards, terms, covenants and obligations contained in this Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties and their respective Transferees, heirs, successors (by merger, consolidation, or otherwise) and assigns, devisees, administrators, representatives, lessees, and all other persons acquiring any rights or interests in the Property, or any portion thereof, whether by operation of laws or in any manner whatsoever and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective heirs, successors (by merger, consolidation or otherwise) and assigns; (2) All of the provisions of this Agreement shall be enforceable as equitable servitudes and constitute covenants running with the land pursuant to applicable law; (3) Each covenant to do or refrain from doing some act on the Property hereunder (A) is for the benefit of and is a burden upon every portion of the Property, (B) runs with the Property and every portion thereof, and (C) is binding upon each Party and each successive owner during its ownership of all or any portion of the Property, and each person having any interest therein derived in any manner through any owner of the Property, or any portion thereof, and shall benefit each Party and the Property hereunder, and each other person succeeding to an interest in all or any portion of the Property. (b) Notwithstanding any of the foregoing and subject to the provisions in Section 7 of this Agreement, any Transferee or Mortgagee which acquires any right or interest in or with respect to the Property or any portion thereof shall take and hold such rights and interests subject to this Agreement and shall not have been deemed to have assumed the OWNER's Obligations or the other affirmative duties and obligations of OWNER hereunder except: (1) To the extent that any of such Transferees or Mortgagees have expressly assumed any of the duties or obligations of OWNER hereunder; (2) If any such Transferee or Mortgagee accepts, holds, or attempts to exercise or enjoy the rights or interests of OWNER hereunder, it shall have assumed the obligations of OWNER and shall comply with the provisions in Section 7 of this Agreement to perfect such assumption the obligations of OWNER; and (3) Subject to any Transferee or Mortgagee complying with Section 7 of this Agreement, then, to the extent that the performance of any duty or obligation by 36 907 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT OWNER is a condition precedent to the performance of a covenant by CITY, it shall continue to be a condition to performance by CITY hereunder. 13.2 No Dedication or Lien. Nothing herein shall be construed as a dedication or transfer of any right or interest in, or as creating a lien with respect to, the title to the Property. 13.3 Constructive Notice and Acceptance. Every person who now or hereafter owns or acquires any right, title or interest in or to any portion of the Project or the Property is and shall be conclusively deemed to have consented and agreed to every provision contained herein, whether or not any reference to this Agreement is contained in the instrument by which such person acquired an interest in the Project or the Property. 14. MORTGAGEE PROTECTION; CERTAIN RIGHTS OF CURE. 14.1 Mortgagee Protection. This Agreement shall be superior and senior to any lien placed upon the Property, or any portion thereof, including the lien of any Mortgage. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no breach hereof shall defeat, render invalid, diminish or impair the lien of any Mortgage made in good faith and for value, and any acquisition or acceptance of title or any right or interest in or with respect to the Property, or any portion thereof, by a Mortgagee (whether under or pursuant to a Mortgage, foreclosure, trustee's sale, deed in lieu of foreclosure, or otherwise), shall be subject to all of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. 14.2 Mortgagee Not Obligated. Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 13.1(a) above, and unless expressly assumed by a Mortgagee pursuant to Section 13.1(b) and Section 7 of this Agreement, no Mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Agreement to perform OWNER's Obligations or other affirmative covenants of OWNER hereunder, or to guarantee such performance; except that to the extent that any covenant to be performed by OWNER is a condition to the performance of a covenant by CITY, the performance thereof shall continue to be a condition precedent to CITY's performance hereunder. 14.3 Notice of Default to Mortgagee; Right of Mortgagee to Cure. If CITY receives notice from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given OWNER hereunder and specifying the address for service thereof, and records a copy of each request in the Recorder's Office in the manner required under Civil Code Section 2924(b) with respect to Requests for Notices of Default ("Notice of Default"), then CITY shall deliver to such Mortgagee, concurrently with service thereon to OWNER, any notice given to OWNER with respect to any claim by CITY that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms of this Agreement or has committed an event of default. Each Mortgagee shall have the right (but not the obligation) to cure or remedy the claim of default or noncompliance set forth in CITY's notice during the remaining cure period allowed OWNER pursuant to Section 11.2 of this Agreement; provided however that in the event that CITY does not deliver the Notice of Default to Mortgagee at the same time as such notice is delivered to OWNER, Mortgagee shall have the same cure rights as OWNER pursuant to Section 11.2 for the full cure period beginning upon the delivery of the Notice of Default to the Mortgagee. If the default is of a nature that can only be remedied or cured by such Mortgagee upon obtaining possession, such Mortgagee shall seek to obtain possession 37 •M DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT with diligence and continuity through foreclosure, a receiver or otherwise, and shall thereafter remedy or cure the default or noncompliance within thirty (30) days after obtaining possession. If any such default or noncompliance cannot, with diligence, be remedied or cured within such thirty (30) day period, then such Mortgagee shall have such additional time as may be reasonably necessary to remedy or cure such default or noncompliance if such Mortgagee commences cure during such thirty (30) day period, and thereafter diligently pursues and completes such cure. 14.4 Bankruptcy. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of Section 14, if any Mortgagee is prohibited from commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings in the nature thereof by any process or injunction issued by any court or by reason of any action by any court having jurisdiction of any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving OWNER, the times specified in Section 14.3 for commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other proceedings shall be extended for the period of the prohibition, provided that such Mortgagee is proceeding expeditiously to terminate such prohibition and in no event for a period longer than one year. 15. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 15.1 Recordation of Agreement. This Agreement and any amendment or cancellation hereof shall be recorded in the Recorder's Office by the Clerk of the City Council within the period required by Section 65868.5 of the Government Code. 15.2 Severabili1y. If any term, provision, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall be determined invalid, void or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby to the extent such remaining provisions are not rendered impractical to perform taking into consideration the purposes of this Agreement, unless and to the extent the rights and obligations of any Party have been materially altered or abridged by such holding. Nothing contained in this Subsection shall be deemed to diminish OWNER's right to terminate under Sections 11 and 12.2 above. 15.3 Governing Law; Venue. This Agreement and any dispute arising hereunder shall be governed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of California, without regard to conflict of laws principles. Any action at law or in equity arising under this Agreement or brought by any Party for the purpose of enforcing, construing or determining the validity of any provision of this Agreement shall be filed and tried in the Superior Court of Riverside County, or the United States District Court for the Central District of California, and the Parties waive all provisions of law providing for the removal or change of venue to any other court. 15.4 Section Headings. All Section headings and subheadings are inserted for convenience only and shall not affect any construction or interpretation of this Agreement. 15.5 Singular and Plural. As used herein, the singular of any word includes the plural. n. DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 15.6 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of the provisions of this Agreement as to which time is an element. 15.7 Waiver. Failure by a Parry to insist upon the strict performance of any of the provisions of this Agreement by any other Party, or the failure by a Party to exercise its rights upon the default of another Parry, shall not constitute a waiver of such Parry's right to insist and demand strict compliance by the other Party with the terms of this Agreement thereafter. 15.8 Force Majeure. No Parry shall be deemed to be in default where failure or delay in performance of any of its obligations under this Agreement is caused by floods, earthquakes, other Acts of God, fires, wars, riots or similar hostilities, strikes and other labor difficulties beyond such Party's control, government regulations or court actions (such as restraining orders or injunctions) beyond such Parry's control (each, an "Event of Force Majeure"). If any such events shall occur, the term of this Agreement and the time for performance by a Parry of any of its obligations hereunder shall be extended by the period of time that such events prevented such performance, provided that the term of this Agreement shall not be extended under any circumstances for more than five (5) years or for a period that would cause this Agreement or the provisions hereof to be void as violating the rule against perpetuities. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Agreement, an extension of time for an Event of Force Majeure shall only be for the period of the enforced delay and shall commence to run from the time of the commencement of the cause, if notice by the Party claiming such extension is sent to the other Party within thirty (30) days of the commencement of the cause, or shall commence to run from the date such notice is subsequently given. Times of performance under this Agreement may also be extended in writing by the mutual agreement of CITY and OWNER. Furthermore, an Event of Force Majeure expressly does not include an extension of time to perform because of past, present, or future difficulty in obtaining suitable construction or permanent financing for the Development of the Site, or because of economic or market conditions. 15.9 Attorneys' Fees. In any judicial proceeding, reference, mediation or other dispute resolution proceeding between the Parties seeking enforcement of any of the terms and provisions of this Agreement against the other Party, the prevailing Party in such proceeding shall recover its reasonable costs and expenses (as determined by a court or referee or other neutral arbitrator/mediator overseeing any dispute resolution proceeding) including but not limited to expert witness fees, attorneys' fees, costs of investigation and preparation prior to the administrative or judicial hearing, and its contribution for the costs of the referee as provided in Section 11.6. The right to apply for recovery of such costs and expenses shall accrue upon commencement of the proceeding, regardless of whether the dispute is prosecuted to a final judgment or decision. 15.10 Mutual Covenants. The covenants contained herein are mutual covenants and also constitute conditions to the concurrent or subsequent performance by the Party benefited thereby of the covenants to be performed hereunder by such benefited Party. 39 910 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 15.11 Conveyances. Conveyances of the Property or portions thereof required or permitted pursuant to the terms of this Agreement (including without limitation any open space or park lands to be conveyed to CITY), shall not include any mineral, oil, gas, hydrocarbon or other substances of every type and nature, in, under or on the Property excepted and reserved by and unto Hofmann Development Company under which OWNER acquired its ownership interest in the Property. 15.12 Relationship of Parties. CITY and OWNER hereby renounce the existence of any form of agency, joint venture or partnership between them and agree that nothing contained herein or in any document executed in connection herewith shall be construed as making CITY and OWNER joint venturers, partners or agents of one another. 15.13 Notices. Any notice required or provided for under this Agreement shall be in writing and delivered in person to an officer of any Party, or sent by Federal Express, private commercial delivery or courier service for next business day delivery, or may be deposited in the United States mail, duly certified or registered, return receipt requested, with postage prepaid, and addressed to the other Party, as follows: If to CITY: City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Attn: City Clerk Attn: Director of Design & Development Dept. Email: CityClerkMail@laquintaca.gov Phone: (760) 777-7000 with a copy to: Rutan & Tucker, LLP 18575 Jamboree Road, 9th Floor Irvine, CA 92612 Attn: William H. Ihrke, Esq. Email: bihrke@rutan.com Phone: (714) 641-5100 If to OWNER: Travertine Corporation c/o Hofinann Land Development Company, LLC 3000 Oak Rd, Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Attn: Louis Miramontes Email: Lmiramontes@KHHtrust.com Phone: (925) 478-2000 with a copy to: TRG Land, LLC 893 Production Place Newport Beach, CA 92663 Attn: Mark Rogers Email: MRogers@TRGLand.com Phone: (949) 722-0634 .O 911 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT with a copy to: Nossaman 18101 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 1800 Irvine, CA 92612 Attn: Gregory W. Sanders, Esq. Fax: (949)833-7878 Phone: (949) 833-7800 Notice may also be given by electronic mail ("E-mail') or facsimile transmission ("Fax") to any Party at the respective Fax number if given above and marked "RUSH - PLEASE DELIVER IMMEDIATELY," provided receipt of such transmission shall be confirmed by follow-up notice within seventy-two (72) hours by another method authorized above. Any Party hereto may from time to time, by written notice to the other Parties as required herein, designate a different address that shall be substituted for the one above specified. Notice by any method shall be deemed served or delivered only upon actual receipt at the address, E-mail address or Fax number listed above. Any notice given as required herein shall be deemed given upon receipt or, if sent by United States mail as provided above, seventy-two (72) hours after deposit in the United States mail or upon receipt. 15.14 Further Actions and Instruments. Each Party shall cooperate with and provide reasonable assistance to the other Party to the extent necessary to implement this Agreement. Upon the request of a Party at any time, the other Party shall promptly execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary to implement this Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. The Parties may, by mutual agreement, make such interpretations, clarifications, or minor modifications to the provisions of this Agreement as may be necessary to resolve ambiguities that may arise in the implementation of this Agreement without amending this Agreement so long as such additional or different requirements are consistent with the general intent and purpose of this Agreement. 15.15 Successors and Assigns. Subject to the provisions of Sections 7 and 14, the terms and conditions of this Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Parties and their successors and assigns. 15.16 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by the Parties in counterparts, which counterparts shall be construed together and have the same effect as if each of the Parties had executed the same instrument. 15.17 Authority to Execute. OWNER represents and warrants that: (a) it is duly organized and existing; (b) it is duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement; (c) by so executing this Agreement, OWNER is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement; (d) OWNER's entry into and performance of its obligations set forth in this Agreement do not violate any provision of any other agreement to which OWNER is bound; and (e) there is no existing or threatened litigation or legal proceeding of which OWNER is aware that could prevent OWNER from entering into or performing its obligations set forth in this Agreement. 41 912 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 15.18 Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with its exhibits, sets forth and contains the entire understanding and agreement of the Parties with respect to the subject matter contained herein, and there are no oral or written representations, understandings or ancillary covenants, undertakings or agreements that are not contained or expressly referred to herein and no testimony or evidence of any such representations, understandings or covenants shall be admissible in any proceeding of any kind or nature to interpret or determine the terms or conditions of this Agreement. [Signature Page Attached] 42 913 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT [Signature Page to Development Agreement] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the day and year first set forth above. CITY: CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation By: Jon McMillen, City Manager ATTEST: Monika Radeva, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William H. Ihrke, City Attorney OWNER: TRAVERTINE CORPORATION, a Minnesota company By:_ Name: Title: By:_ Name: Title: 43 914 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss COUNTY OF On , before me, , a Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public 915 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss COUNTY OF ) On , before me, , a Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public STATE OF CALIFORNIA ss COUNTY OF On , before me, , a Notary Public, personally appeared , who proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. I certify under PENALTY OF PERJURY under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing paragraph is true and correct. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public A45 916 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: (APN'S: 766-110-003 AND 766-120-001) THE WESTERLY 300.00 FEET OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF, 1452.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID WESTERLY LINE, 300.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES, 1452.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 300.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 33, THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33 BEARS NORTH 00 DEG 01' 00" WEST, 920.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG 26' 27" EAST 300 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG 01' 00" EAST 400.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 29' 45" WEST 300.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4; THENCE NORTH 00 DEG 01' 00" WEST 400.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 33, DISTANT THEREON SOUTH 0 DEG 01' 00" EAST, 1320.00 FEET FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER THEREOF; THENCE NORTH 89 DEG 29' 45" EAST, 300.00 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE WESTERLY 300.00 FEET OF SAID SECTION 33; ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 30.00 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL 2: (APN: 766-110-004) THE NORTH 3/5 OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN BY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTH 315 BEING PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; EXCEPT THE WESTERLY 300.00 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL 3: (APN: 766-110-007) THE WEST 3/5TH OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN FIT 917 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN BY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY. THE EAST LINE OF SAID WEST 3/5 BEING PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHERLY 100.00 FEET OF THE WESTERLY 400.00 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPTING THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED HALF INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS AND HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND ALL MINERALS, WHETHER METALLIC OR NON-METALLIC, IN, UNDER OR ON, OR WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED, EXTRACTED OR REMOVED FROM SAID LANDS, WHICH INTEREST IS SO LIMITED, HOWEVER, THAT THE OWNERS THEREOF HAVE NO RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS OR REGRESS IN, OVER OR ACROSS, OR RIGHT TO DRILL, EXPLORE FOR, MINE OR REMOVE SAID OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS BY OPERATIONS ON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, BUT HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXPLORE FOR, MINE AND REMOVE SAID OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS FROM SAID REAL PROPERTY A DEPTH OF FIVE HUNDRED FEET OR MORE BELOW THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY BY SLANT DRILLING, SHAFTS, TUNNELS, OR OTHER MEANS OR OPERATIONS ON OR FROM LAND OTHER THAN SAID LAND. PARCEL 3A: A NON-EXCLUSIVE EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND UPON EACH OF THE TWO STRIPS OF REAL PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, REPAIR, REPLACEMENT AND USE FOR ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICULAR TRAFFIC OF A ROAD AND OF WATER AND ELECTRICITY TRANSMISSION PIPES, LINES AND ALL EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES, AND OTHER UTILITIES; SAID STRIPS OF REAL PROPERTY ARE DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE WESTERLY 30.00 FEET AND THE SOUTHERLY 30.00 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE NORTHERLY AND EASTERLY 30.00 FEET THEREOF. PARCEL 4: (APN: 766-110-009) THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, AS SHOWN BY UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF; EXCEPTING THEREFROM AN UNDIVIDED HALF INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS AND HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND ALL MINERALS, WHETHER METALLIC OR NON-METALLIC, IN, UNDER OR ON, OR WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED, EXTRACTED OR REMOVED FROM SAID LANDS, WHICH INTEREST IS SO LIMITED, HOWEVER, THAT THE OWNERS THEREOF HAVE NO RIGHT OF INGRESS, EGRESS OR REGRESS IN, OVER OR ACROSS, OR RIGHT TO DRILL, EXPLORE FOR, MINE OR REMOVE SAID OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS BY OPERATIONS ON THE SURFACE OF SAID LAND, BUT HAVE THE RIGHT TO EXPLORE FOR, MINE AND REMOVE SAID OIL, GAS AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES AND MINERALS FROM SAID REAL PROPERTY A DEPTH OF FIVE HUNDRED FEET OR 918 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT MORE BELOW THE SURFACE OF SAID REAL PROPERTY BY SLANT DRILLING, SHAFTS, TUNNELS, OR OTHER MEANS OR OPERATIONS ON OR FROM LAND OTHER THAN SAID LAND. PARCEL 5: (APN: 766-120-002) THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE THEREOF, 1452.00 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID WESTERLY LINE, 300.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AT RIGHT ANGLES, 1452.00 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE 300.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 6: (APN: 766-120-003) THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WESTERLY 300 FEET THEREOF; ALSO EXCEPTING AN UNDIVIDED THREE -SIXTHS (3/6) INTEREST IN AND TO ALL OIL, GAS, AND OTHER HYDROCARBON SUBSTANCES, AND ALL MINERALS, WHETHER METALLIC OR NONMETALLIC, IN, UNDER OR ON OR WHICH MAY BE PRODUCED, EXTRACTED OR REMOVED FROM SAID REAL PROPERTY. PARCEL 7: (APN: 766-120-015) THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE WEST 880 FEET OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN. PARCEL 8: (APN: 753-050-007) THE SOUTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF. PARCEL 9: (APN: 753-040-017) THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF. PARCEL 10: (APN: 753-040-014) THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF. PARCEL 11: (APN: 753-050-029) A3 919 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN. PARCEL 12: (APN: 753-060-003) ALL OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF; EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 50' 58" EAST ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 4 A DISTANCE OF 2644.21 FEET TO THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 49' 39" EAST CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE OF SECTION 4 A DISTANCE OF 1091.02 FEET; THENCE NORTH 01 DEG 08' 54" WEST A DISTANCE OF 301.93 FEET; THENCE NORTH 26 DEG 40' 44" WEST A DISTANCE OF 583.47 FEET; THENCE NORTH 18 DEG 03' 05" WEST A DISTANCE OF 913.94 FEET; THENCE NORTH 62 DEG 19' 09" WEST A DISTANCE OF 523.06 FEET; THENCE NORTH 55 DEG 53' 25" WEST A DISTANCE OF 545.46 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 86 DEG 15' 16" WEST A DISTANCE OF 668.56 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 74 DEG 18' 58" WEST A DISTANCE OF 248.98 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 47 DEG 47' 20" WEST A DISTANCE OF 285.54 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 37 DEG 17' 03" WEST A DISTANCE OF 352.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEG 55' 17" WEST A DISTANCE OF 268.28 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 73 DEG 28' 11" WEST A DISTANCE OF 330.60 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44 DEG 46' 57" WEST A DISTANCE OF 235.15 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 280 57' 52" WEST A DISTANCE OF 399.38 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 13 DEG 40' 56" WEST A DISTANCE OF 38.51 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 4; THENCE SOUTH 00 DEG 55' 20" EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 999.40 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPTING THEREFROM ALL OIL, GAS AND OTHER MINERAL DEPOSITS, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT TO PROSPECT FOR, MINE, AND REMOVE THE SAME, ACCORDING TO THE PROVISIONS OF THE ACT OF CONGRESS APPROVED JUNE 1, 1938 (52 STAT. 609), AS RESERVED IN THE PATENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 18, 1992 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 352836 OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL 13: (APN: 753-040-016) THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF. EXCEPTING THEREFROM 1/2 OF ALL MINERAL RIGHTS BY DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 12, 1984 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 84-265643 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL 14: (APN'S: 766-120-006 AND 766-120-016) THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, AND THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE 920 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT SURVEY THEREOF. EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, PER DOCUMENT RECORDED NOVEMBER 12, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-0597136, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 15: (APN: 766-120-018) BEING A PORTION OF PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 3 OF QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED MARCH 2, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2006-0152345, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN (S.B.M.), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "A" COMMENCING AT THE CENTER -SOUTH ONE SIXTEEN CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTH 89046'28" EAST 880.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH ONE HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE NORTH 89046'28" EAST 121.48 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 0001 F0I" EAST 660.95 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH ONE HALF OF THE SOUTH ONE HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33 SOUTH LINE SOUTH 89047'10" WEST 121.48 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 0001 F01" WEST 660.92 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 16: (APN: 766-120-021) BEING A PORTION OF PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED MARCH 12, 2008 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-0121018, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN (S.B.M.), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL "A" COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THAT REAL PROPERTY AS DESCRIBED IN SAID INSTRUMENT NO. 2008-0121018, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE EAST SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE SOUTH 89047' 10" WEST 129.91 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH ONE HALF OF THE SOUTH ONE HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 33 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE SOUTH 89047' 10" WEST 224.62 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF A5 921 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT 802.00 FEET, A LINE RADIAL TO SAID CURVE AT SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 38-23,25" WEST; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AN ARC DISTANCE OF 360.07 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 25°43'25", A LINE RADIAL TO SAID CURVE AT SAID POINT BEARS SOUTH 64006'50" EAST; THENCE SOUTH 00014'08" EAST 277.63 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 17: (APN: 766-120-023) THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN QUITCLAIM DEED RECORDED MARCH 2, 2006 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2006-0152345, AS PARCEL 5, OFFICIAL RECORDS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN (S.B.M.), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE NORTH 00014'08" WEST 661.28 FEET ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PROPERTY, ALSO BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE SOUTH 89047' 10" WEST 129.91 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTH LINE NORTH 00014'08" WEST 661.25 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PROPERTY; THENCE NORTH 89046'28" EAST 129.92 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER THEREOF, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 33; THENCE SOUTH 00014'08" EAST 661.28 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 18: (APN: 764-280-057) THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 10, 2005 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0113798, OFFICIAL RECORDS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN (S.B.M.), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTH 89048'23" EAST 101.24 FEET ALONG CENTER SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTER SECTION LINE SOUTH 00012'45" WEST 10.19 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 20012'35" EAST 13.99 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00037'20" WEST 248.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01 ° 19'43" EAST 90.88 FEET; A6 922 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT THENCE SOUTH 00009'35" WEST 228.86 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 02058'47" WEST 61.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01034'58" WEST 8.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE AS DESCRIBED WITHIN SAID GRANT DEED; THENCE SOUTH 89048' 15" WEST 98.67 FEET ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY PROPERTY LINE TO A POINT ON THE CENTERLINE OF MADISON STREET, ALSO BEING THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTH 00014'08" WEST 661.28 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 19: (APN'S: 764-280-059 AND 764-280-061) THAT PORTION OF THE PROPERTIES AS DESCRIBED IN GRANT DEEDS RECORDED FEBRUARY 18, 1997 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 053692 AND 053694, BOTH OFFICIAL RECORDS, RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, LYING WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN (S.B.M.), BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE NORTH 00014'08" WEST 30.00 FEET ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF MADISON STREET, ALSO BEING THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 34 TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 00014'08" WEST 1953.83 FEET ALONG SAID CENTERLINE TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID INSTRUMENT NO. 053692; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 89048' 15" EAST 98.67 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY LINE; THENCE SOUTH 01034'58" WEST 156.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00029'17" WEST 362.12 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°36'06" WEST 205.42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00°56'31" EAST 180.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00004'19" EAST 631.61 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°10'49" WEST 168.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 03003'00" EAST 25.26 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 00046'14" WEST 176.88 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 27028'20" EAST 54.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY OF AVENUE 62 AS DESCRIBED BY DEED RECORDED APRIL 17, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 32692, OFFICIAL RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTH 89047'50" WEST 101.67 FEET ALONG SAID NORTHERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. A7 923 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT B SITE MAP CaY91 AVENUE G0 .1 •' Mountain - N • RESORT VILLAS "�3Y=Y ENTRY — - - - n RESIhRT 6� NAn P.: i F: LOWER COMMUNITY J CENTER COMMUNITY GRAND IN'FERCONNECTOR LOOPTkAIL TRAILS I II v se� 6 sY - �e'}, m JJ ENTRY /`- M 1• V N i".0,1 AV_GNUE o2 f - l ,S���.....,.R„®7,- FRAIL STAGING UPRERCOMMUNITY1eii CENTER __— ..- r f SS Via` "°.,.,e .,i A• 6 :�6a� AREA d ® v ^!� r �,� �"' appe .GOLF '-- ig - ��• � 4 ACADEMY y 3.# SANQUET FACILITY AND WEDDING GARDEN STROLLING TRAILS COMMUNITY GRAND FOUR HOLE PRAT ICE - WITH REST STOPS LOOP TRAIL FACILITY Martinez � -- -. Rock Slide- 1 xEA U$t[ NGROUP, Z021 m 924 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT C EXISTING LAND USE REGULATIONS A. Existing Development Approvals: 1. Environmental Impact Report No. , certified by City Council Resolution No. State Clearinghouse Number 2018011023 2. General Plan Amendment No. GPA 2017-0002, adopted by City Council Resolution No. 3. Specific Plan No. SP 2017-0004, adopted by City Council Resolution No. _- 4. Zone Change No. ZC 2017-0002, adopted by City Council Ordinance No. _- 6. Tentative Subdivision Tract Map No. 37387 B. Other Existing Land Use Regulations: 1. Charter for the City of La Quinta 2. General Plan of the City of La Quinta 3. The La Quinta Zoning Ordinance [Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code] applicable to the Property (including but not limited to the zoning regulations attached as Appendix 1 to Specific Plan No. SP 2017-0004 that permit the use of portions of the Property for the Operations and Servicing Activities for CVWD) 4. The La Quinta Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan, adopted February 19, 2013 [Note: City and Owner to determine how to best maintain copies of the above documents for future reference as referenced in the Agreement.] 925 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT D DESCRIPTION OF PUBLIC BENEFITS The public benefits to be received by CITY and its residents as a result of this Agreement include, without limitation, the following: 1. Fiscal Contributions A. Expansion of Real Property Tax Base and Resulting Revenues: Development of the Project is projected to increase the property tax base within the City by $630.7 million, and would generate nearly $6.0 million per year in new General Fund revenue for the City at full buildout of the project (and thereafter) (not including inflation and appreciation). Based on the Travertine Specific Plan ("TSP" or "Specific Plan") as proposed and the July 27, 2023 Fiscal Impact Analysis ("2023 FIA"), projected increased revenue sources to CITY in 2023 values include, but are not limited to: i. Increased Property Tax Revenues: Increased annual property taxes to the City of approximately $1.4 million (not including inflation and appreciation) at full buildout. ii. Construction Related Fee Revenue: The City will receive $X,XXX [to be inserted] in revenues to pay for plan check, inspections and other building/infrastructure fees. iii. Transient Occupancy Tax: The City will receive approximately $980,000 per year in transient occupancy taxes from TSP resort uses and approximately $2.2 million per year in transient occupancy taxes from TSP short-term rentals. iv. Positive Fiscal Impacts: While there are no anticipated deficits to the General Fund caused by the Project, should any project related deficit occur, such amounts will be reimbursed by OWNER pursuant to Paragraph 1.13 below and Section 3.7 of the Agreement. V. Net Positive Revenue Impact: Projected $2.0 million annual net positive impact to the City's revenues (at full buildout of the project, not including inflation and appreciation) B. Fire, Police and Emergency Services: OWNER will cause the following contributions for emergency services to CITY to be paid by OWNER or a Financing District if and when duly established in accordance with the Agreement: i. Development related public safety expenditures: OWNER will cause the difference to be paid into the CITY's general fund. If this fiscal impact to CITY's general fund caused by the Project occurs, it will be funded through payment of an annual "Annual Impact Fee". The Annual Impact Fee may be paid either by the OWNER or through a Financing District. The amount of the Annual Impact Fee will be determined by the CITY on an annual basis throughout the Term of the Agreement, comparing the annual revenues received into the City's General Fund generated from the Project and the revenues estimated in the 2023 FIA. The CITY will calculate the amount for the Annual Impact Fee in such a manner so that any Impact Fees that have been paid by OWNER at the time when those Impact Fees were due and payable to the CITY are accounted for as contributing revenues that had been estimated in the 2023 FIA. The CITY and OWNER will coordinate in good faith for the process under which the Annual Impact Fee will be calculated by the CITY and paid by OWNER. D-1 926 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT ii. New Fire Station Servicing Project and Surrounding Area: Development of the Project and the Property has been identified pursuant to that certain Fire Access Master Plan (Approved 9/22/2020) as requiring the construction, equipping and placing in service of a new fire station. The Conditions of Approval for Project Site Development Permits, Condition No. 82, requires the participation of each and every landowner in contributing its fair share of the cost of construction of a fire station to serve the project. Payment of each landowner's fair share contribution, if not otherwise agreed upon by the OWNER and the CITY and memorialized in a recorded covenant pursuant to Condition No. 82, shall be accomplished through the Financing District. C. School Facilities Modernization: Pursuant to and at the times provided in separate agreements with the Coachella Valley Unified School District and the Desert Sands Unified School District (collectively, "Districts"), OWNER will pay school impact fees of approximately $4.79 / square foot (residential fee) for such staffing and/or expansion and modernization of school facilities as may be identified by the District and agreed to by OWNER. D. County Libraryquipment: Prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the first residential dwelling unit within the Project, OWNER will contribute [to be inserted] to the County of Riverside Public Library. 2. Dedication/Preservation of Public Park, Trails and Open Space A. Public Facilities: OWNER will convey 0.9 gross acres to CITY for use as a public facility (such as trail head parking). B. Improvement of Trail Head Parking: C. Trails: As provided in the TSP, OWNER will develop a publicly -accessible trail system on over 6.4 acres within the Project, providing connectivity to open space, surrounding public recreation facilities, and trails. The trail system, which will include a scenic promenade and network of sidewalks and multi -use trails, will be constructed in phases as the Project is developed. The trail system shall remain accessible to the general public in perpetuity and shall be made available in the same manner as if it were a public trail system, subject to such reasonable rules and regulations as established from time to time by the homeowner's association responsible for ownership and maintenance of the trail system. D. Open Space Preservation; Habitat Reserve: As provided in the TSP, approximately 301.2 acres of land within the Project will be used for open space uses. Of the 301.2 acres, there will be approximately 2.3 acres dedicated to domestic water facilities owned and operation by CVWD. Furthermore, there will be approximately 100 additional acres purchased which will provide habitat for Peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni), a federally -designated threatened species, and other species ( "Habitat Reserve"). The Habitat Reserve will be managed and monitored in perpetuity under an endowment funded by OWNER at no cost to CITY. The Habitat Reserve will be restricted by a conservation easement, deed restriction or similar restriction to ensure its preservation as a habitat area as required by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service or other applicable resource agency. E. Maintenance Responsibilities Regarding Park, Trails and Open Space: Paragraph 5 below provides a breakdown of the various maintenance responsibilities of the Parties regarding roadways, infrastructure, park, open space and other improvements. F. Financing District: All reasonable costs of CITY related to the formation of any Financing District contemplated by this Agreement will be paid by OWNER or reimbursed by the D-2 927 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT Financing District as more specifically described in Exhibit F. Any such Financing District may include all or a portion of the Project. CITY shall not be responsible for any Financing District obligations except as otherwise provided in Exhibit F. 3. Circulation Imurovements A. Public and Private Streets within Project: The extension of Jefferson Street and Avenue 62 (as shown on the TSP) and any streets with a back -of -curb to back -of -curb width of 36 feet wide or greater shall be acquired by, or conveyed to CITY in as public rights -of -way from back -of -curb to back -of -curb upon completion of construction in compliance with plans therefor approved by CITY. Other streets within the Project may be maintained by a homeowner's association at no cost to CITY, and, if any such street is private, CITY will permit it to be gated. B. Construction and Funding of Circulation Improvements. The construction and funding for the circulation improvements referenced in Paragraph 3.0 (the "Jefferson Street Improvements"), Paragraphs 3.1) (the "Avenue 62 Improvements"), and 3.E below (the "Other Circulation Improvements") shall be as follows: i. Jefferson Street Improvements: No later than prior to the issuance of the 601" certificate of occupancy for a residential dwelling unit within the Project, OWNER shall substantially complete OWNER'S share of the Jefferson Street Improvements (based upon the segment of roadway specified in this Paragraph 3 and as further illustrated on Exhibit D-1 attached hereto, which segment is the same as what is specified in Appendix M.1, Section 4.16 of the EIR,) as said improvements are described in the Traffic Study for the Travertine Residential Project, La Quinta dated September 27, 2021 (the "Traffic Report"). In the event that construction of OWNER'S share of the Jefferson Street Improvements requires that OWNER also construct any portion of CITY's share of said improvements as described in the Traffic Report (the "City Portion"), then OWNER shall set up separate accounting for the construction of the City Portion and construct the City Portion at OWNER'S cost, subject to reimbursement by CITY through one or more of the following: (a) payment to OWNER by CITY from its general fund or other funds available to CITY in the amount of the actual cost of the CITY Portion constructed by OWNER (the "CITYShare"), (b) issuance by CITY to OWNER of credits equal to the CITY Share to be applied against payment of Development Impact Fees, as defined in the Agreement, or (c) payment by CITY of funds deposited by OWNER for the Other Circulation Improvements specified in Paragraph 3.E below from the escrow account established pursuant to Paragraph 3.13(iii) below. CITY shall pay the CITY Share to OWNER or issue the Development Impact Fees credits to OWNER within thirty (30) days of CITY's receipt of OWNER'S invoice for the CITY Share, together with backup information substantiating how the CITY Share of the actual construction costs of the CITY Portion was determined. ii. Avenue 62 Improvements. Prior to City's certification of grading for Phase A of the Project, OWNER shall substantially complete, the Avenue 62 Improvements described in Paragraph 3.1) below. iii. Other Circulation Improvements. The Other Circulation Improvements described in Paragraph 3.E below shall be constructed by CITY at such time as determined by CITY. The parties agree that CITY shall determine the order of priority in which it constructs the Other Circulation Improvements. OWNER's "Fair Share" of the Other Circulation Improvements shall be the portion of the cost of such improvements based upon the segment of roadway as specified in this Paragraph 3 and as further illustrated on Exhibit D-1 attached hereto. OWNER shall either (a) pay or cause (through a public Financing District) its Fair Share of the cost of the Other Circulation Improvements (which cost is based upon the estimated price for each such improvement in the Traffic Report, including the contingency) by depositing said Fair Share into D-3 928 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT an escrow account established by City for all Other Circulation Improvements prior to the issuance of the rough grading permit for the Project, or (b) pay its Fair Share of the cost of the Other Circulation Improvements based upon the contract price for each Other Circulation Improvement within thirty (30) days after OWNER's receipt of written notice from CITY that CITY has acquired the necessary right-of-way and has awarded a construction contract for the Other Circulation Improvements. (For OWNER payments pursuant to subsection (b) of the preceding sentence, if City constructs the Other Circulation Improvements pursuant to separate contracts for one of more of said improvements, then OWNER shall pay CITY the amount of OWNER's Fair Share for the applicable improvement to be constructed within thirty (30) days after OWNER's receipt of written notice from CITY that CITY has acquired the necessary right-of-way and has awarded a construction contract for each such Other Circulation Improvement.) Upon construction and/or payment of its share of the Circulation Improvements as provided in subsections (i), (ii) and (iii) above, OWNER shall be deemed to have fully satisfied its obligations with respect to the construction and funding of the Circulation Improvements described above. C. Jefferson Street Improvements. The Jefferson Street Improvements are generally described as follows: i. Widening/Surfacing: Jefferson Street will be extended, widened and resurfaced to a 40-foot-wide roadway, from Avenue 58 and extending across Guadalupe Creek Diversion Dike to include one lane in each direction, with 40' pavement section with sidewalk on the west side. ii. Sidewalks, Landscaping and Related Improvements: In connection with the Jefferson Street roadwork, new curb, gutter, sidewalk and landscape improvements will be installed. A 6-foot-wide sidewalk and related landscape improvements will be constructed within the SP area. iii. Bike Lanes: A Class II bike lane will be completed within the road right-of- way providing access to other areas of CITY. iv. Bus Stops: Additional bus stops or turnouts are proposed along Jefferson Boulevard near the Project site. D. Avenue 62 Improvements: Development of the Project will also include the following improvements that will improve circulation and safety on Avenue 62. i. Culvert/Drainage Improvements: Construction of drainage -related infrastructure adjacent to Avenue 62 to reduce or minimize flooding on Avenue 62 during storm events. E. Surrounding Roadway provements: Construction and/or Fair Share contribution of roadway improvements outlined in the Traffic Report. F. Maintenance Responsibilities for Circulation Improvements: Paragraph 5 below provides a breakdown of the various maintenance responsibilities of the Parties regarding roadways, infrastructure, park, open space and other improvements. 4. Backbone Infrastructure and Related Benefits: Following issuance of the first permit for mass grading of the Project and at such times as provided in the Project Approvals or as required by applicable agencies in connection with such Development, OWNER will provide the ME 929 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT following: A. Water Reservoirs: OWNER will construct two new onsite water reservoirs, as well as install a new pump station to service the 0.6-million-gallon reservoir. These improvements will enhance the fire -flow capabilities of the water service system in this area of CITY. This will benefit both residents of the Project and residents of the City of La Quinta northerly of the Project. B. Water Quality Basins: OWNER will construct a number of water quality basins, bioswales, water quality filtration inlets, detention basins and similar features designed to enhance water runoff from the Project. This will enhance water quality to receiving waters, reduce pollutant runoff, and promote groundwater recharge. C. Maintenance Responsibilities for Backbone Infrastructure: See Pargarph 5 below for breakdown of the various maintenance responsibilities of the Parties regarding roadways, infrastructure, park, open space and other improvements. 5. Maintenance Responsibilities. Other than for the public walkway and landscaping along Jefferson Street and Avenue 62 (which will be maintained by CITY), OWNER shall provide for ongoing maintenance of all landscaping (including all common area landscaping and landscaping within public rights -of -way within the Project boundary), trails, walkways and protected open space installed or located within the Project, including but not limited to all public rights -of -way (except for the Public Facilities) through a homeowner's association or other financing mechanism at no cost to CITY. CITY shall maintain, at its sole cost and expense, the curbs and pavement between the curbs, the storm drain lines installed within the open space to service the Project, as well as other sewer and storm drains as shown on the attached "maintenance responsibility" exhibits. Depictions showing the respective maintenance obligations of OWNER and CITY as described above, as well as maintenance responsibilities not specified above of OWNER, CITY and other responsible parties, are attached hereto as Exhibits D-2 and D-3. 6. Incorporation of Sustainable Features in Development A. Landscaping: OWNER will install substantial landscape material, including trees, shrubs, and ground cover on the Project site during Development of the Project. This will facilitate absorption of greenhouse gases. B. Home Design: OWNER will ensure implementation of project design features and compliance with all greenhouse gas emissions mitigation measures identified in the Project Approvals. C. Community Facilities Design: OWNER will incorporate all project design features and ensure compliance with all greenhouse gas emissions mitigation measures identified in the Project Approvals. D. Site Planning: In connection with site planning for the Project, the Project proposes resource efficient building design by installing green roofs and solar panels, considering the solar orientation of the buildings to reduce environmental impacts, and implementing passive and active solar systems to take advantage of local climate conditions. In addition, the incorporation and design of the internal roadways, sidewalks and multi -use trail system will enhance and encourage residents to walk or bike to nearby resort, retail, golf training facility and recreational facilities. E. Project Design Features (PDFsJ OWNER will incorporate the following design features and attributes for promoting energy efficiency and sustainability, which shall be D-5 930 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT enforceable by the City pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and the EIR Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. Pedestrian connections shall be provided to surrounding areas consistent with the City's General Plan. Providing a pedestrian access network to link areas of the project site encourages people to walk instead of drive. The project would provide a pedestrian access network that internally links all uses and connects to all existing or planned external streets and pedestrian facilities contiguous with the project site. The project would minimize barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. The project will include improved design elements to enhance walkability and connectivity. Improved street network characteristics within a neighborhood include street accessibility, usually measured in terms of average block size, proportion of four- way intersections, or number of intersections per square mile. Design is also measured in terms of sidewalk coverage, building setbacks, street widths, pedestrian crossings, presence of street trees, and a host of other physical variables that differentiate pedestrian -oriented environments from auto -oriented environments. • The project will design building shells and building components, such as windows; roof systems: electrical and lighting systems: and heating, ventilating, and air conditioning systems to meet Title 24 Standards in effect at the time of construction. 2019 Title 24 standards are expected to result in 30% less energy for non-residential buildings and 53% less energy use for residential use due to lighting upgrades. The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. Using electricity generated from photovoltaic (PV) systems displaces electricity demand which would ordinarily be supplied by the local utility. Since zero GHG emissions are associated with electricity generation from PV systems, the GHG emissions reductions from this PDF are equivalent to the emissions that would have been produced had electricity been supplied by the local utility. A minimum of 15% of the project's electricity demand will be generated on -site. • In order to reduce the amount of waste disposed at landfills, the project would be required to implement a 65% waste diversion as required by AB 939. The following PDFs are part of the project, but no numeric credit has been taken for their implementation to provide a conservative analysis: • Specified use of Energy Star appliances. • Installation of water -efficient plumbing fixtures. • Installation of light -emitting diode (LED) technology within homes. • Use of drought -tolerant plants in landscape design. • Installation of water -efficient irrigation systems with smart sensor controls. • Lighting sources contribute to GHG emissions indirectly, via the production of the electricity that powers these lights. Public street and area lighting includes: streetlights, pedestrian pathway lights, area lighting for parks and parking lots, and outdoor lighting 931 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT around public buildings. Lighting design should consider the amount of light required for the area intended to be lit. Lumens are the measure of the amount of light perceived by the human eye. Different light fixtures have different efficacies or the amount of lumens produced per watt of power supplied. This is different than efficiency, and it is important that lighting improvements are based on maintaining the appropriate lumens per area when applying this measure. Installing more efficacious lamps will use less electricity while producing the same amount of light, and therefore reduces the associated indirect GHG emissions. D-7 932 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT D-1 Owner's Circulation and Public Benefit Improvements 1. Increased Habitat Area and Open Space - Approximately 357.1 acres of open space, which includes (a) approximately 55.9 acres to be dedicated or used for public recreational, staging areas, gathering areas and trail purposes, open space uses including picnic tables, barbeques, golf practice facilities, and staging facilities for the public regional interpretative trail and (b) 301.2 acres of natural open space uses, consistent with the TSP. 2. Public Trails and Staging - The Project will provide approximately 5 miles of public trail with a small staging area with parking located at the eastern project entry south of Ave 62. The trail will incorporate educational elements highlighting native desert ecology and floral and faunal species, including Peninsular bighorn sheep. 3. Jefferson Street Improvements - On -site, Jefferson Street should be constructed from the North Loop intersection to the northerly Project boundary at its ultimate full section width, with curb and gutters. The 601 st certificate of occupancy shall not be issued until Jefferson Street from Avenue 60 (the project boundary of the Travertine Development) to Avenue 58 is constructed. 4. Avenue 62 Roadway Improvements — The Project will be responsible to construct interim cross-section improvements along Avenue 62 west of Monroe Street and extending across Dike No. 4 to include one lane in each direction, with 40' pavement section with sidewalk on the north side. 5. Madison EVA — The Project will be responsible to construct 1 mile of roadway improvements to Madison Street from Ave 60 to the SP boundary as an emergency vehicular access to include one lane in each direction, with 24' pavement section. 6. CVWD Water Tanks and Access Road — Two on -site reservoirs (Zone 335 and Zone 425) and access to be constructed. The volume of the upper tank will be 600 thousand gallons and the lower tank will be a volume of 2.65 million gallons. 7. Up to Five (5) CVWD Well Sites — The project will develop up to five well sites located within a 2-mile radius of the project site. 8. TOT — Revenue from Resort uses and Short -Term Vacation Rentals. W: 933 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT D-2 Depiction of Landscape and Street Maintenance Responsibilities L— A m • VENUE 934 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT D-3 Depiction of Storm Drain Maintenance Responsibilities D-10 935 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT E FORM OF GRANT DEED/OFFER FOR PUBLIC FACILITIES [attached] 936 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND RETURN TO: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: City Clerk (Space Above For Recorder's Use) Exempt recording fee pursuant to Govt. Code § 6103. GRANT OF EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT [form may be modified or substituted for specific conveyance and/or type ofpublic use] THIS GRANT OF EASEMENT AND AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is made this day of , 20, by ,a (hereinafter referred to as the "Grantor"). RF.CTTAT,S A. Grantor is the legal owner of a fee interest in certain real property located in the County of Riverside, State of California, commonly known as , La Quinta, California, which property is identified by Riverside County Assessor Parcel Number(s) and more particularly described in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (hereinafter referred to as the "Property"). B. Grantor desires to grant to the City of La Quinta, a California municipal corporation and charter city (the "City"), a perpetual and irrevocable easement in, on, under and across a portion of the Property described in Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B (both of which are incorporated herein by this reference) for [ INSERT AS APPLICABLE: right-of-way, public street, utility purposes and ancillary uses] . AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, Grantor and City agree as follows: 1. GRANT; DESCRIPTION OF EASEMENT AREA. Grantor grants the City an easement for the purposes listed below on that portion of the Property described on Exhibit A and depicted in Exhibit B (the "Easement Area"). 2. PURPOSE. The easement is for a perpetual and irrevocable easement in, on, under and across the Easement Area for right-of-way, public street, utility purposes and ancillary uses. 3. DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIONS. Grantor shall retain all normal rights and incidents of ownership of the underlying fee interest in the Property not inconsistent with E-1 937 this Agreement. Grantor shall not be bound to undertake any supervision or maintenance of the Easement Area to provide for the public purposes hereunder. [Previous sentence may not be applicable in all instances (i.e., where conditions of approval require owner maintenance).] Grantor must relocate any utilities or other encumbrances located within the Easement Area at Grantor's sole cost and expense if requested by City for use of the Easement Area. Grantor shall be responsible for any hazardous materials or contaminants located in the Easement Area prior to the date of this Agreement. 4. DURATION; SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS; RUNS WITH THE LAND. This Agreement shall be binding upon the owner and the heirs, assigns or successors in interest to the Property described above in perpetuity and shall not expire. This Agreement and terms, conditions and restrictions shall run with the land and be binding on the heirs, assigns and successors of the Grantor in the manner provided for herein. 5. TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS. This Agreement, easement and restrictions shall be deemed to constitute a servitude upon and burden to the Property within the meaning of Section 3712(d) of the California Revenue and Taxation Code, or successor statute, which survives a sale of tax -deeded property. 6. COUNTERPARTS. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, which, taken together, shall constitute one complete and enforceable agreement. [Signatures Contained On Following Page] E-2 938 Executed this day of , 20, at La Quinta, California. "Grantor" a California non-profit corporation By: Its: By: Its: "City" CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation and charter city LE City Manager Attest: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM City Attorney E-3 939 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On , before me, , a notary public, personally appeared personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. Signature STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On , before me, Fl notary public, personally appeared , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument, the person(s), or the entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. Witness my hand and official seal. Signature E-4 940 EXHIBIT A (Legal Description of Easement Area Attached) E-5 941 EXHIBIT B (Depiction of Easement Area Attached) E-6 942 EXHIBIT C (Legal Description of Property Attached) E-7 943 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT F FINANCING OF PUBLIC FACILITIES AND POTENTIAL PUBLIC PROPERTIES CITY and OWNER acknowledge that the Development Agreement contemplates the establishment by City Council or another agency authorized to establish a Financing District or one or more Financing Districts. It is expected a single Financing District will be established under the provisions of the Mello -Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended (the "Mello -Roos CFD Act"), and City's CFD Policy, to finance the acquisition of Potential Public Properties and the acquisition and construction of Public Facilities necessary to meet increased demands placed upon local agencies as the result of the development of the Property or as referenced elsewhere in the Development Agreement. CITY and OWNER shall use good faith efforts to establish one or more Financing Districts that include the Property, subject to the Goals and Policies, except to the extent any such goal or policy is waived by action of the City Council, applicable State law and the following general considerations: A. General Parameters. i. Formation Advance. Upon written demand of CITY's Finance Director, OWNER will advance amounts necessary (in an amount at least as much as required by the City's CFD Policy) to pay all reasonable costs and expenses of CITY to evaluate and structure one or more proposed Financing Districts that include the Property, to the end that CITY will not be obligated to pay any costs related to the formation or implementation of the proposed Financing District(s) from its own general fund. CITY staff will provide OWNER with a Deposit/Advances Agreement and a preliminary budget for such costs at such time as OWNER decides to move forward with the formal process of establishing the Financing District(s), and will advise OWNER from time to time as to any necessary modifications to that budget. ii. Reimbursement of Advance. If requested by OWNER, each Financing District will provide for the reimbursement to OWNER of any advances by OWNER described in Subparagraph A.i. above, and any other costs incurred by OWNER that are directly related to the Financing District(s), such as the costs of legal counsel, financial advisors, special tax consultants, engineers and other persons retained by OWNER. OWNER agrees to promptly submit to CITY a detailed accounting of all such costs incurred by OWNER upon written request, but in any event at least thirty (30) days prior to the issuance of any Bonds for the Financing District. Such other costs will be reimbursed to OWNER, without interest, only from the proceeds of Bonds issued for the applicable Financing District, and then only to the extent that CITY's bond counsel determines that such reimbursement is permitted under relevant State law, and CITY's Finance Director determines, with the assistance of CITY's Financial Advisor, that such costs are reasonable and necessary to the formation of the applicable Financing District, or otherwise were incurred in furtherance of the purposes of the applicable CFD. iii. Selection of Financing Team. Pursuant to the City's CFD Policy, the CITY has a right of first refusal to select the financing team, including bond counsel, underwriter, appraiser, absorption consultant, financial advisor, special tax consultant and other consultants deemed necessary by the CITY to accomplish any Financing District financing. The CITY will select the financing team in consultation with OWNER. B. Financing District Boundaries. It is expected the Financing District will only include the Property or portions thereof. The Financing District may include more improvement areas designated pursuant to Section 53350 of the Government Code (each, an "Improvement Area") corresponding to grading phases of the Property, or as otherwise desirable to reflect the F-1 944 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT manner and phasing of construction to occur on the Property, for purposes of financing of, or contributing to the financing of, Public Facilities, and the acquisition of Potential Public Properties. Each Improvement Area shall be authorized to finance all or any of the Public Facilities and Potential Public Properties regardless of the location of the Public Facilities or Potential Public Properties. C. Public Facilities and Properties. i. Public Facilities Construction Schedule. OWNER shall submit to CITY a description of, and proposed construction schedule for, any Public Facilities to be financed by the Financing District (except with respect to facilities to be financed at the option of CITY, as described elsewhere in the Development Agreement), including the priority and financing needs relative to the proposed Public Facilities. CITY will disburse available Financing District Proceeds (defined below) in accordance with such priorities, and as otherwise provided in this Development Agreement and the "Acquisition Agreement" (defined below). ii. Expenditure of Financing District Proceeds. Any Public Facilities to be financed must (i) be permitted under Section 53313.5 of the Government Code and must be necessary to meet increased demands placed upon local agencies as the result of development occurring in the Financing District, or (ii) be specifically authorized for financing elsewhere in this Development Agreement. iii. Construction of Public Facilities. The Public Facilities financed with the Financing District Proceeds shall be constructed in accordance with all applicable prevailing wage laws. Except as expressly set forth in the Development Agreement with respect to certain CITY facilities, it is expected that OWNER will be responsible for the construction of Public Facilities to be financed by the Financing District. CITY will determine, following consultation by CITY staff with OWNER, the bidding requirements and other terms applicable to the construction of Public Facilities, including the possible acquisition of discrete portions or phases of facilities as permitted by Section 53313.51 of the Government Code. CITY and OWNER will enter into an acquisition agreement setting forth the requirements for Public Facilities to be financed by the Financing District (the "Acquisition Agreement"). iv. List of Potential Public Properties. Throughout the Term of the Development Agreement, the CITY and OWNER may identify and keep an active list of properties on, adjacent to, or (to the maximum extent permitted by the Mello -Roos CFD Act) within the vicinity the Property, that would provide for public services or public use consistent with the Mello -Roos CFD Act and the Development Agreement. Such list of properties shall be identified as "Potential Public Properties" that may be subject to acquisition with Financing District Proceeds. The CITY shall be the custodian of and maintain any list of Potential Public Properties. V. Public Facilities Owned By Other Governmental Entities. If any of the Public Facilities proposed to be financed by a community facilities district will be owned or operated by a governmental entity other than CITY, CITY will use reasonable efforts to enter into joint community facilities agreements with respect to such facilities as may be required by Section 53316.2 of the Government Code; however, CITY shall not be required to indemnify or pay the costs of any such governmental entity except with respect to costs or claims arising from the CITY's negligence or willful misconduct or relating to the CITY's Public Facilities. Nothing in this Exhibit shall prevent OWNER from facilitating the execution of any such joint communities facilities agreement by offering to provide any such indemnity or to pay such costs. F-2 945 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT D. Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes. i. Payment of Administrative Costs. The payment of actual initial and annual administrative costs of CITY to be incurred in connection with the Financing District shall be adequately assured, through the inclusion in any special tax methodology of appropriate provision for such costs as estimated by CITY, to the end that CITY's general fund shall never be called upon to provide for initial or any annual administrative costs related to the Financing District. ii. Rate and Method of Apportionment. The rate and method of apportionment of special taxes (the "RMA") for the Financing District and/or each Improvement Area within the Financing District must comply with the requirements of Section 53321(d) of the Government Code, but may establish different tax rates for different categories of property. CITY will consider any categories of property suggested by OWNER, but the apportionment of special taxes must be reasonable as determined by CITY. Given that undeveloped property (i.e., parcels without a building permit) has less of an impact on public facilities than developed property (i.e., parcels with a building permit), it is expected that special taxes will be levied first on developed property to its maximum special tax rate, and then on undeveloped property, as necessary to pay Financing District administrative costs and debt service on outstanding Bonds. iii. Maximum Annual Tax Rate. CITY shall not be under any obligation of any kind to approve an RMA which includes a maximum special tax rate applicable to residential parcels which, when added to all current and projected annual special taxes, real property taxes and other amounts due to public agencies that are secured by liens on such parcels (including but not limited to, liens imposed by any other community facilities district or financing district to fund school district obligations with respect to the Property), is expected to exceed two percent (2.0%) of the estimated market value of such parcels upon completion of expected public and private improvements. CITY and OWNER will cooperate in good faith to establish an RMA for each Improvement Area that will satisfy all applicable requirements of the California Government Code and that are consistent with the preceding sentence and with Subparagraph D.ii above. It is acknowledged that residential parcels will be developed over an extended period of time and that the pricing information determined as of the date of formation of the Financing District may reflect price appreciation that may not be achieved or may be exceeded such that changes to maximum special tax rates in the RMAs may be appropriate from time to time. In light of the foregoing, each RMA will include provisions authorizing an administrative reduction in the maximum special tax rates in one or more tax categories prior to the issuance of Bonds as requested by OWNER to reduce the special tax rates in one or more tax categories. In addition, CITY will, at the written request of OWNER, undertake proceedings pursuant to Section 53331 et seq. of the California Government Code to increase maximum special tax rates in the event of significant increases in expected sales prices of developed residential parcels, similar in lot size and square footage, from those used as a basis for the special tax rates in any RMA then in effect. iv. Annual Tax Increases. At OWNER's request, each RMA shall provide for an annual increase in the maximum special tax up to 2% per year. Each RMA will allow for prepayment, in whole or in part, of the special tax applied to Bonds with fixed expiration dates, pursuant to a methodology acceptable to CITY. V. Additional Special Taxes on Developed Properties. Each RMA may provide, at CITY's discretion, a separate annual special tax on developed property of up to $50 per residential unit (subject to increases as described in D.iv. above) (the "Additional Special Tax"), to be applied to the financing of construction and/or acquisition costs of public facilities designated by CITY in addition to those described in C.i. above, and in addition to any financing for the acquisition and/or construction of Potential Public Properties. F-3 946 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT vi. Direct Levy of Developed Property Special Taxes. Each RMA shall provide for the levy of special taxes on developed property to pay directly for the Public Facilities and Potential Public Properties. Prior to the issuance of Bonds, the Financing District shall levy special taxes on developed property at the maximum special tax rate and the amount collected each year shall first be applied to pay Financing District annual administrative costs and the remainder shall be deposited in a discrete, interest -earning special tax fund (the "Special Fund") and disbursed to pay for Public Facilities and Potential Public Properties pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement. The amounts deposited in the Special Fund and the net proceeds of Bonds shall be referred to as "Financing District Proceeds." The Financing District may, as directed by the City, also levy the Additional Special Tax on developed property at any time. E. Financing Considerations. i. Financial Viability. The financial viability of any Improvement Area will be of material concern to CITY. CITY will consider written requests by OWNER as to the size, term and timing of any particular issuance of Financing District Bonds, as well as the advice of any financial consultant or underwriter employed by it in connection therewith. ii. Securi1y. Each series of Bonds shall be secured solely by (a) special taxes, (b) proceeds of the Bonds issued that are placed in a bond fund or reserve fund for the financing, (c) tax increment revenues of any Infrastructure Financing District (IFD), if formed, but only to the extent specifically directed and agreed to by OWNER, CITY and the IFD, and (d), if required, credit enhancement. No CITY general funds or other CITY revenues or assets and no tax increment revenues of the IFD shall be pledged to the repayment of any public financing, except that tax increment revenues may be so pledged to the extent explicitly directed and agreed to by OWNER, CITY and the IFD. Both Parties acknowledge that the security for the bonded indebtedness of the Financing District is non -recourse as to CITY and as to OWNER. iii. Debt Ratio. Except as otherwise authorized by the City Council in accordance with Section 53345.8 of the Government Code, the value of the real property that is subject to the special tax to pay debt service on the Bonds (determined in a manner consistent with the requirement of Section 53345.8 of the Government Code) shall be at least four (4) times the aggregate direct and overlapping debt secured by liens on the real property or such higher value to lien ratio as is necessary to market the Bonds at rates comparable to those for similar financings in the public debt market at the time the bonds are issued. The value of any real property included in a community facilities district shall be determined by CITY in a manner consistent with the third sentence of Subparagraph D.iii. above and Section 53345.8 of the California Government Code prior to each issuance of debt obligations for a Financing District. iv. Credit Enhancement. Following consultation with the bond underwriter, CITY's financial advisor and OWNER, CITY may require a letter of credit from a financial institution acceptable to CITY for up to two years of debt service on a series of Bonds (except the portion of such debt service that is payable from special taxes on completed structures) to the extent that CITY determines such credit enhancement is appropriate in the circumstances or reasonably necessary to market the bonds at reasonable interest rates. The amount of such letter of credit shall be reduced as OWNER conveys property to others and/or structures are completed; and such letter of credit will be released: (a) at such time as the development of the Property has progressed so that annual special tax levies on developed property are sufficient to pay the annual debt service on the Bonds and annual administrative costs in order to provide security for the repayment of the bonds and (b) if and to the extent that substitute letter of credit or other form of credit enhancement (from a financial institution, and in a form, acceptable to CITY) is delivered to CITY. F-4 947 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT V. Provision of Financial Information. OWNER understands that CITY will have disclosure obligations under state and federal securities laws to prospective purchasers of debt incurred in connection with any community facilities district financing, and OWNER agrees to provide CITY with any financial and other information reasonably requested in connection with such disclosure obligations; provided, however, that if any such financial or other information is requested to be provided regarding OWNER's parent corporation, such information shall be limited to publicly available information provided by OWNER's parent corporation to state and federal governmental agencies in compliance with applicable securities laws. In addition, to the extent determined necessary by disclosure counsel for any community facilities district bonds to be issued, OWNER will execute and comply with its obligations under a continuing disclosure agreement intended to satisfy the requirements of applicable Federal securities laws. F. Disclosure to Future Landowners. OWNER shall comply with all applicable laws as to the disclosure of the existence of any community facilities district to the purchasers of any portion of the Property within the community facilities district. Any and all such disclosure documentation shall be filed by OWNER with CITY's Finance Director. The CITY may require the OWNER to submit to prospective purchasers of all or a portion of the Property, in addition to any disclosure required under applicable law, either: (a) a mutually acceptable form of disclosure statement or (b) a disclosure statement that indicates it has been prepared by CITY and that CITY is solely responsible for its contents. G. Best Efforts Undertaking. Although CITY agrees to use its best efforts to form one or more Financing Districts in accordance with the foregoing, it shall incur no monetary liability for its failure to form any such Financing District. CITY expects that CITY staff will meet and confer with OWNER from time to time with respect to all major aspects of the community facilities district prior to its formation, but the final decisions regarding all aspects of any Financing District shall be subject to the review and approval of City Council. F-5 948 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT G CHAPTER 3.25 OF LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE as of EFFECTIVE DATE [to be inserted at recording] 949 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT H SCHEDULE OF PERFORMANCE / PHASING PLAN [attached] 950 TRAVERTINE 8/1/2024 PROJECT COMPONENT LAND USE START COMPLETION* MASTER SITE IMPROVEMENTS - Backbone N.A. 42 months within Vesting Date 18 months after Start Date PHASES RESIDENTIAL 1A & 1B 600 24 months within Vesting Date 36 months - 72 months after Start Date 2 308 54 months within Vesting Date 36 months after Start Date 3 292 78 months within Vesting Date 37 months after Start Date Note: Schedule contingent on obtaining license agreements from Bureau of Reclamation for the crossings of Madison Street and Avenue 62 at Dike #4 and Bureau of Land Management for the crossing of Jefferson Street at the Guadalupe Dike. *Completion defined as 70% of C-of-O's issued, and are the outside deadlines permissible under this Agreement, subject to the terms of this agreement. Note: If Developer provides evidence reasonably satisfactory to the City that then existing market conditions do not allow for the development on economically feasible terms and orderly absorption of such product type to the point of completion as specified above, then such period shall be extended for up to five 1-year periods to be approved by the City Manager. **Vesting Date is defined as the later of (i) the Effective Date of the Development Agreement and (ii) the running of all applicable status of limitations and referendum petition deadlines with no legal challenges or petitions having been filed or submitted, or if filed or submitted, successfully resolved to the satisfaction of Developer City. 951 .L 5 AVENUE 58 — ----- CORAL CANYON (FUTURE) \Dike 2 .. Coral Mountain NAP PHASE 1-A Construction/Sales PA Land Use Acres Density Range Target Target Density Units Villas 10 Low Density Residential 25.6 1.5-4.5 du/ac 2.9 75 11 Resort / Golf 46.2 12 Low Density Residential 52.2 1.5-4.5 du/ac 2.0 105 13 Low Density Residential 26.7 1.5-4.5 du/ac 1.8 48 14 Low Density Residential 39.0 1.5-4.5 du/ac 1.7 65 15-A Low Density Residential 20.9 1.5-4.5 du/ac 2.1 44 19 Open Space Recreation 23.1 20 Open Space Natural 301.2 Phase 1-A Totals 534.9 0.6 337 A-15A rj PA- PA-12 PA-13 PA-20 ' F7 Martinez Rock Slide WATER n 0 Dike 4 z ti AVENUE 66 L . MADISON ST EVA ..-- 14[ rri 0 1 AVENUE62 PA-10 PA-19 PA-11 y ti 2026 - 2027 T R A V E R T I N E Phase 1A - Construction 952 CORAL CANYON (FUTURE) Coral Mountain i AVENUE58 PHASE 1-B Construction/Sales PA Land Use Acres Density Range Target Target Density Units Villas- 5 Low Density Residential 16.2 1.5-4.5 du/ac 1.9 31 7 Low Density Residential 18.7 1.5-4.5 du/ac 3.3 61 8 Low Density Residential 16.9 1.5-4.5 du/ac 4.3 73 9 Medium Density Residential 14.8 4.5-8.5 dulac 4.9 72 15-B Low Density Residential 12.4 1.5-4.5 dulac 2.1 26 18 Open Space Recreation 14.7 Phase 1-B Totals 93.7 2.8 263 n 0 Dike 4 z co ti k NAP PA-5 A-15 PA-7 PA-8 PA-9 PA-1 E PA-15 PA-14 � 0 PA-19 PA-11 PA-13 PA-12 PA-20 r� f tWATER Martinez Rock Slide TANKS N MADISON ST ^_ AVENUE62 2028 - 2029 T R A V E R T I N E Phase 1 B- Construction 953 i Dike 2 AVENUE 58 CORAL CANYON (FUTURE) n Coral ° Mountain Dike 4 z ti AVENUE60 I` ti n m C ` MADISON ST EVA � NAP 1 I °m PA-4 y y PA-16 PA-5 PA-6 y- PA-9 rA-18 PA-15 PA-7 PA-8 AVENUE 62 PA-15A r PA-14 PA-10PA-19 PA-11 PA-12 ' PA-13 I r PA-20 it Martinez Rock Slide WATER i TANKS N T R A V E R T I N E 0411PRIM PHASE 2 Construction/Sales PA Land Use Acres Density Range Target Target Density Units Villas 4 Low Density Residential 9.6 1.5-4.5 du/ac 3.0 29 6 Medium Density Residential 20.1 4.5-8.5 du/ac 8.1 163 16 Lo%� Density Residential 50.4 1.5-4.5 du/ac 2.3 116 Phase 2 Totals 80.1 3.8 308 Phase 2 -Construction 954 Dike 2 AVENUE 58 F CORAL CANYON (FUTURE) n Coral Mountain Dike 4 co AVENUE60 MADISON ST ° z ti i 0 PA-1 PA-17 EVA NAP PA-2 A PA-3 -�r °m J y PA-16 ' PA-5 •A-6 A-15 PA-7 PA-8 - YH-y rA-18 AVENUE 62 - j - PA-15A PA-10 r � PA-14 PA-19 PA-11 PA-12 — PA-13 PA-20 tMartinez Rock Slide i TANKS N PHASE 3 Construction/Sales PA Land Use Acres Density Range Target Target Density Units Villas 1 Resort /Spa 38.3 100 2 Medium Density Residential 25.9 4.5-8.5 du/ac 7.9 205 3 Low Density Residential 29.4 1.5-4.5 du/ac 3.0 87 17 O en Space Recreation 18.1 Phase 3 Totals 111.7 2.6 292 100 2031 - 2032 7 R A V E R T I 1V E Phase 3-Construction 955 DRAFT VERSION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DRAFT EXHIBIT I MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM AND PROJECT DESIGN FEATURES [attached] 956 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT Travertine Specific Plan et al, La Quinta CA 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Chapter 4.0 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 4.1 Introduction If mitigation measures are required or incorporated into a project as part of the CEQA process, the lead agency must adopt a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) to ensure compliance with the project's mitigation measures. Sections 15097 and 15126.4(a)(2) of the CEQA Guidelines provide that a project's mitigation measures must be enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other mechanisms. CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines further provide that the MMRP must be adopted at the time of project approval. However, while the MMRP does not have to be included in the EIR, for the sake of maximizing public transparency, a copy of the proposed Project's MMRP has been included in this Final EIR below. In light of the foregoing, this Chapter contains the proposed Project's MMRP. The MMRP was prepared to provide a program for not only monitoring and reporting on the Project's mitigation measures, but also enforcing compliance with respect to the implementation of each mitigation measure adopted for the Project. The purpose of the mitigation measures is to mitigate or avoid significant environmental effects of the Project. 4.2 Monitoring Authority The City may delegate duties and responsibilities for monitoring compliance with the objective performance standards established by any given mitigation measure to designated environmental monitors or consultants as deemed necessary. The City may also delegate such duties and responsibilities to certain responsible agencies, affected jurisdictions, enforcement and regulatory agencies of the state or county, special districts and other agencies. The same duties and responsibilities may also be delegated to qualified private entities which accept the delegation. The City's Development Services (or equivalent positions of other designated agencies or entities) must ensure that the officials delegated the duties or responsibilities to monitor any given set of mitigation measures are qualified to assume such duties and responsibilities. Any deviation from the procedures identified under the MMRP shall require prior approval or authorization by the City. Moreover, any deviations from any of the established monitoring procedures set forth in the MMRP and any remedial actions taken to correct such deviations shall be reported immediately to the City by the assigned environmental monitor or consultant. Notwithstanding any such delegation, the City shall remain responsible for monitoring the implementation of all of the project's mitigation measures in accordance with the project's MMRP. Travertine Final EIR 4-1 July 2024 957 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM 4.3 Enforcement Responsibility The mitigation measures for the proposed project will primarily apply prior to or during construction of the project in all phases of development the project. The City shall be responsible for enforcing each mitigation measure, albeit the City may assign such enforcement responsibilities to a qualified environmental monitor. The assigned environmental monitor for each construction activity shall report any problems with enforcement to the City and appropriate agencies. The MMRP prepared for the proposed project will be fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. 4.4 Mitigation Monitoring Table Table 4-1, Travertine Specific Pion Amendment Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, below identifies for each mitigation measure: (1) the potential impact on the environment that the mitigation measure is focused on; (2) a description of the mitigation measure; (3) the entity responsible for monitoring the mitigation measure; (4) the timing for implementing the measure; and (5) the anticipated level of significance of the impact at issue after mitigation. Travertine Final EIR 4-2 July 2024 958 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Table 4-1 Travertine Specific Plan Amendment Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Level of Potential Impacts on Mitigation Measure Responsible for Timing g Significance the Environment Monitoring After Mitigation Section 4.1, Aesthetics AES-1 In order to reduce the proposed substation's impact on the existing visual character and c. Visual character or reduce the potential degradation of scenic scenic quality quality of the surrounding area, the Project City Council/ d. Light and glare applicant shall use one or more of the following Planning or comparable techniques: perimeter barriers, Commission landscaping appropriate for the substation IID During review of Less than facility. Additionally, glare shall be controlled Substation Significant through the use of non -reflective surfaces, Public Works dulling finishes to help blend the structures with Department the surroundings and reduce glare and color contrast, or comparable methods subject to the Project Applicant approval of IID. See 13I0-12, B1O-17, and BIO-30 Section 4.2, Air Quality AQ-1 The General Contractor and all sub -contractors shall ensure that during Project and off -site b. Result in a utility construction activities, off -road diesel City Planning & cumulatively construction equipment rated at 50 horsepower Public Works During ground considerable net (hp) or greater, complies with EPA/CARB Tier 4 Department disturbing Less than increase if any off -road emissions standards or equivalent and activities & Significant criteria pollutant shall ensure that all construction equipment is Project Contractor construction tuned and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer's specifications. Travertine Final EIR 4-3 July 2024 959 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM a. Conflict with implementation of applicable air quality pp q Y plan AQ-2 The Project applicant must comply with South Coast AQMD Rule 445 (Wood -Burning Devices as amended b explicitly ), Y p Y prohibiting the use of wood burning stoves and fireplaces in the proposed new development. City Planning & Public Works Department Project Contractor Prior to the approval of grading plans Less than Significant Mitigation Measures to Reduce VOC from Mobile Sources: AQ-3 The Project operator shall provide and/or accommodate facilities within the Project property such as bicycle parking and storage, to encourage bicycle use instead of driving as a method to reduce or otherwise eliminate certain vehicle trips within the Project area. AQ-4 The Project operator of the on -site resort facilities shall implement procedures to accommodate remote work or telecommuting, as applicable to the work City Planning & sectors, as a method to reduce commercial Public Works vehicle miles traveled. Department During operation Less than Significant AQ-5 The Project operator shall encourage the use Project Applicant/ of low emission vehicles to reduce the Contractor reliance on gasoline or diesel fuel by providing charging stations and designated parking for emissions free vehicles. Mitigation Measures to Reduce VOCs from Consumer Products: AQ-6 The Project operator shall utilize "Super - Compliant" or otherwise non -aerosol dispersal/application methods (and/or low VOC products) in all Commercial Buildings including the Hotel, Spa and Golf Training Travertine Final EIR 4-4 July 2024 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Facility. This includes but is not limited to: air fresheners, cooking spray, floor maintenance products, furniture maintenance products, degreaser, oven cleaners, toilet care products. Project operators can refer to the CARB Consumer Product Program web site for the most current information. AQ-7 The Project operator shall utilize low VOC products to the greatest degree possible on all landscape maintenance activities associated with the Commercial Buildings, Golf Training grounds and Common Landscape Areas. These shall be applied with non -aerosol measures where possible. Applicable products include insecticides, pesticides, pool/spa disinfectants, grill cleaners. Project operators can refer to the CARB Consumer Product Program web site for the most current information. AQ-8 The Project operator shall require all commercial products to be diluted as directed. AQ-9 The Project operator shall use low -solvent or solvent -free paints for all commercial buildings and common area monumentation or walls (including repairs.) AQ-10 The Project operator shall minimize the use of pesticides with high organic solvent contents, and/or the use of emulsions and water -based formulations. Section 4.3, Biological 11310-1 Because USFWS has determined that fences Resources could block wildlife movement, fences will USFWS Prior to issuance Less than of permit Significant not be used as an initial deterrent to Travertine Final EIR 4-5 July 2024 961 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM a. Substantial adverse unauthorized access; however, a fencing City Planning effect on any contingency plan will be developed to address Department candidate, sensitive or any future indirect Project impacts. Following special status species the formation of the HOA and before the Project Applicant/ in local or regional completion of the habitat interface golf Developer plans, policies, or course, the Project applicant will establish a regulations, or by the three -person committee, with California Department representatives from USFWS, CDFW, and the of Fish and Game or HOA to monitor and assess the future need US Fish and Wildlife for a buffer fence. The committee will be Service charged with assessing whether a future fence is needed based on whether a fence is needed to prevent human access to sheep habitat or keep bighorn sheep off the project site. In addition, if USFWS finds evidence that a fence is necessary to prevent human access to prevent human access to sheep habitat or keep bighorn sheep off the project site, USFWS may require the construction of the fence at its sole discretion. To avoid complications in the installation of a future fence, the Project applicant would be required to provide wildlife fence easements at the exterior boundary of the golf course or trail corridor, whichever is the outer most perimeter of the project, create an HOA as the legally responsible party for fence installation, and provide or identify a dedicated source of funds to construct the fence prior to recording the first final map. Consistent with the terms of the Project Biological Opinion, upon either a three - person committee or USFWS's unilateral determination that a fence is necessary based on the criteria specified in the Biological Travertine Final EIR 4-6 July 2024 W 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Opinion, an 8-foot-tall wildlife fence constructed of tubular steel and painted to blend in with the desert environment shall be installed where the Project interfaces with Coral Mountain along the northern boundary and extend southward along the western and southern boundary of proposed development to preclude PBS from entering the Project and humans from entering the sheep habitat. The fence shall extend to where Avenue 62 intersects with the eastern Project boundary. 11310-2 All lighting located within the development City Planning footprint shall conform with the Commission/City Less than requirements outlined in the Travertine Council Prior to approval Significant Specific Plan and the MSHCP. Project Applicant 113I0-3 Where the Project is located adjacent to the SRSJM Conservation Area along its western edge, a minimum buffer of 74 feet shall be incorporated between SRSJM undeveloped City Planning native desert areas and private homeowner Commission/City Less than parcels and public gathering areas. Each Council Prior to approval Significant private homeowner parcel along this western edge shall have fencing at the top of slope Project Applicant with Lexan panels to dampen noise to an appropriate level. 11310-4 All plant species identified as invasive by the CVMSHP, or that are known to be toxic to PBS, will be prohibited from inclusion in Project City Planning landscaping including areas adjacent to Commission/City Prior to approval Less than proposed open space. Prior to site Council of landscape Significant disturbance a Project -specific list of plan prohibited plant species will be prepared by a Project Applicant qualified biologist for use in developing the Project Landscape Plan. This will include Travertine Final EIR 4-7 July 2024 963 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM plants identified as invasive by the California Invasive Plant Council (Cal-IPC) and the CVMSHCP. The City shall review the landscape palette prior to planting. B10-5 The final design and location of natural trails will be approved by the USFWS and the City to minimize disturbance to PBS. Unauthorized trails currently in use on the Property will be closed to minimize impacts to bighorn sheep and replaced with the trail proposed as part of the Project. The nature trail will be closed USFWS to equestrian and bicycle use. Other than this trail, no additional trails would be proposed City Planning or allowed as part of the Project. To restrict Commission/City Final Design Less than human access to surrounding hills, including: Council Significant (a) placement of "no trespass" signs at legally enforceable intervals along the trail and Project Applicant habitat/development interface, with legally enforceable language; (b) development of CC&Rs and educational materials that explain to residents and members the ecology of bighorn sheep and the rules concerning unauthorized hiking into sheep habitat. B10-6 Project proponent shall permanently protect 19.7 acres in Section 5 as bighorn sheep habitat. Prior to recording the first final map, Project proponent also has committed to City Planning acquire an additional approximately 100 Commission/City Prior to acres of bighorn sheep habitat in Section 5 Council recording the g Less than that also are strategically located to fragment first final map Significant larger blocks of land into smaller units with Project Applicant reduced development potential. All lands proposed for conservation in Section 5 will be approved by the Service and protected in perpetuity consistent with California Civil Travertine Final EIR July 2024 964 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Code Section 815, et seq. For more detail, please refer to the Section 5 Addendum to the Travertine Biological Assessment. BIO-7 Project proponent shall establish a $500,000 endowment with the Center for Natural Lands Management (CNLM) to be managed by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to assist with the long-term management of bighorn sheep. Of CNLM this total, $100,000 will be provided upon issuance of the first grading permit, with the USFWS Prior to approval Less than balance of $400,000 paid in installments of Significant $100,000 per year over the succeeding four Project Applicant years. Long-term maintenance and monitoring activities shall be outlined in a long-term management plan and submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval. 11310-8 Project proponent shall provide an additional $100,000 to the CNLM endowment above to support the gathering of information on the CNLM Less than effects of the regional trails system on Prior to approval Significant bighorn sheep, including trails in and around Project Applicant the Project site. Travertine Final EIR 4-9 July 2024 965 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BIO-9 The Jefferson Street extension through Section 32 will be constructed using active and passive design features to prevent public roadside parking and foot access into bighorn sheep habitat (e.g., boulders, k-rail, berm, narrow road shoulder, bar ditch, and restrictive signage), subject to review and approval by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. BIO-10 Within the project boundary, approximately 100 yards at the west end of the newly constructed Jefferson Street Loop in the USFWS southwest comer of Section 33, where it Prior to approval Less than connects with the Avenue 62 alignment, will Project Significant be left as undeveloped desert. The distance in Applicant/Developer some places will be less than 100 yards but other features such as "manufactured slopes" and "property fences" will be used, as shown in Figure 4 — BO Conservation Measure #7 of the Project Biological Opinion. This design feature, in combination with enhanced native landscaping, will discourage unauthorized vehicle access into bighorn sheep habitat in Section 5 adjacent to the Travertine project boundary. City Planning BIO-11 No exotic plants known to be toxic to PBS, or Commission/City invasive in desert environments, will be used Council Prior to approval Less than in project landscaping. Significant Project Applicant/Developer City Planning BIO-12 The Project shall not provide direct public Commission/City access from internal streets to hillside sheep Council Prior to approval Less than habitat. Significant Project Travertine Final EIR 4-10 July 2024 •.. 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Applicant/Developer City Planning Commission/City BIO-13 The Project Nature Trail will form the southern Council Less than and western perimeters of the Project. Prior to approval Significant Project Applicant/Developer City Planning BIO-14 To deter bighorn sheep access to the project Commission/City site, natural landscaping and property fences Council Less than around residential areas would reduce noise, Prior to approval Significant light, and visual impacts on surrounding hills. Project Applicant/Developer BIO-15 The best management practices shall be used to preclude the establishment of potential City Planning disease vectors at open water features (i.e., Commission/City water bodies will be designed with steep, Council Prior to approval Less than unvegetated slopes and deep enough water Significant to prevent establishment of emergent Project wetland vegetation). Applicant/Developer BIO-16 CC&R's and Project Specific Plan conditions shall prohibit activities that emit noise above City Planning specified levels (not to exceed 60 dB(A) for Commission/City sensitive receptors or 75 dB(A) for Council Less than nonresidential receptors (per City Ordinance p (p y Prior to approval Significant 9.100.210 Noise Control). For example, only Project quiet electric golf carts will be used for service Applicant/Developer and maintenance. City Planning BIO-17 Outdoor lighting will be down -shielded and Commission/City directed away from the hillsides in Council Prior to approval Less than accordance with the City municipal code. Significant Project Applicant/Developer Travertine Final EIR 4-11 July 2024 967 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BIO-18 To increase public awareness regarding the sensitivity of PBS in the region, educational materials will be provided to homeowners and made available to users of the public facilities within the Travertine development. This material will be prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and CDFW. In addition, the Project proponent will provide within the project an area dedicated as an interpretive center concerning the bighorn sheep. City Planning Commission/City Council Project Applicant/Developer During operation Less than Significant BIO-19 The two water reservoirs will be constructed of steel or concrete and buried underground City Planning to the extent possible, or screened by Commission/City landscaped berms. Any tank appurtenances Council (e.g., valves) remaining above -ground will be Prior to approval Less than painted with non -reflective paint colored to CVWD Significant blend with the surrounding habitat and to prevent light from being reflected toward Project sheep habitat in the Santa Rosa Mountains. Applicant/Developer BIO-20 Dogs and other pets are not allowed within the National Monument and appropriate signage at the designated trailhead parking areas and any other access points will be installed to prohibit dogs along the Nature Trail. CC&Rs City Planning and club rules will require pets to remain on a Commission/City leash while outside enclosed areas, and will Council Less than prohibit pets from entering the hills at any Prior to approval Significant time. The Project proponent will consult with USFWS during the drafting of Rules & Project Applicant/Developer Regulations concerning appropriate rules and regulations to protect bighorn sheep. The Master Declaration of Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions will incorporate rules and regulations specifically addressing bighorn Travertine Final EIR 4-12 July 2024 •.. 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM sheep, which rules and regulations may be modified, amended or deleted only with the express written consent of USFWS. Violators of CC&Rs and club rules will be subject to increasingly severe penalties. Compliance with the local "leash law" will also be enforced pursuant to City ordinance and the project's Specific Plan conditions." A variety of other measures will be implemented to restrict human access to surrounding hills, including training personnel to monitor and control human access to adjacent hills. City Planning BIO-21 The acreage of the Project Site that is located Commission/City within the MSHCP Conservation Area shall be Council Prior to approval Less than dedicated to Conservation in perpetuity. Significant Project Applicant/Developer BIO-22 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the project proponent will provide a no -interest City Planning $2,000,000 loan to the CVCC or its designee Commission/City upon mutually agreeable terms to acquire Council essential bighorn sheep habitat in the Prior to the Less than project area. This provision may be revised CVCC/Wildlife issuance of Significant or substituted for in a manner of equal or Agencies grading permits greater benefit to the Plan upon mutual agreement of CVCC, the Wildlife Agencies, Project and the Project proponent. Applicant/Developer BIO-23 A Qualified Biologist will prepare and present Qualified Biologist to each employee (including temporary, contractors, and subcontractors) a Worker City Planning Prior to grading Less than Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) Commission/City or construction prior to the worker's initiation of work on the Council activities Significant Project site. Workers shall also be advised by the Qualified Biologist of the special -status Project Travertine Final EIR 4-13 July 2024 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM wildlife species in the Project site, the steps to Applicant/Developer avoid impacts to the species and the potential penalties for taking such species. At a minimum, the WEAP will include the following information: occurrence of the listed and sensitive species in the area, their general ecology, sensitivity of the species to human activities, legal protection afforded to these species, penalties for violations of federal and State laws, reporting requirements, and Project features and mitigation measures designed to reduce the impacts to these species and promote continued successful occupation of habitats within the Project area. Included in this WEAP will be color photographs of the listed species, which will be shown to the employees. Following the WEAP, the photographs will be posted in the contractor and resident engineer office, where they will remain through the duration of the Project. The contractor, resident engineer, and the Qualified Biologist will be responsible for ensuring that employees are aware of the listed species and observe reporting and mitigation and avoidance requirements. A record of all trained personnel will be kept with the construction foreman onsite. If new construction personnel are added to the project, the construction foreman will ensure that new personnel receive WEAP training before they start working. BIO-24 Prior to issuance of grading permit, a qualified Qualified Biologist prior to issuance Less than biologist will be designated to monitor of grading permit Significant construction activities and advise City Planning Travertine Final EIR 4-14 July 2024 970 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM construction personnel of the sensitive Commission/City biological resources on site that may be Council impacted by, and conversely, that must be avoided during site development. A biological Project monitor will be on site to monitor avoidance Applicant/Developer activities and to monitor all clearing and grubbing activities, as well as grading, excavation, and/or other ground -disturbing activities in jurisdictional areas to ensure that impacts do not exceed the limits of grading and to minimize the likelihood of inadvertent impacts on special -status species. The monitor will flush avian species and remove and relocate, if possible, non -avian species to a safe location outside of the immediate construction zone (generally 1,000 feet or more onto public lands, when feasible). Where appropriate, the biological monitor will mark/flag the limits of environmental sensitive areas (ESAs) to restrict project activities near the areas. These restricted areas will be monitored to protect the species during construction. The biological monitor will ensure that all biological mitigation measures, BMPs, avoidance and protection measures described in the relevant project permits, approvals, licenses, and environmental reports, and CEQA documents, are in place and are adhered to. Monitoring will cease when the sensitive habitats and jurisdictional areas have been cleared or impacted. The biological monitor will ensure that construction activities will maintain measures to prevent accidental trapping of wildlife into Travertine Final EIR 4-15 July 2024 971 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM excavated areas and inspect excavated areas daily to detect the presence of trapped wildlife. All deep or steep -walled excavated areas should be covered with plywood or other weight bearing material and will be furnished with escape ramps at a 3:1 slope or are surrounded with exclusionary fencing in order to prevent wildlife from entering them. Trapped wildlife should be relocated out of harm's way to a suitable habitat outside of the project area. The biological monitor will have the authority to temporarily halt all construction activities and all non -emergency actions if ESAs and special -status species are identified and will be directly impacted. The monitor will notify the appropriate resource agency and consult if needed. If needed, and if possible, the biological monitor will relocate the individual outside of the work area where it will not be harmed. Work can continue at the location if the project proponent and the consulted resource agency determine that the activity will not result in impacts on the species. All biological monitor observations of special - status species will be documented and mapped in monitoring logs. Monitoring logs will be completed for each day of monitoring. All special -status species recordings will be submitted to the CNDDB. The biological monitors will be responsible for documenting compliance with avoidance measures, the results of the surveys and the ongoing monitoring, and will provide a copy of the monitoring reports for impact areas to Travertine Final EIR 4-16 July 2024 972 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM the County EPD and any permitting agencies that require reporting. The appropriate agencies will be notified if a dead or injured protected species is located within the project site. Written notification will be made within 15 days of the date and time of the finding or incident (if known) and will include: location of the carcass, a photograph, cause of death (if known), and other pertinent information. BIO-25 Prior to issuance of grading permits and commencement of any ground -disturbing activities or vegetation removal the following measures would be implemented to avoid impacts on ESAs, surrounding habitats, and special status species and wildlife: a. Project footprint would be set at the minimum size to accomplish necessary Prior to issuance work, and the footprint will be of a Qualified Biologist of grading permit size/area no greater than is identified in and the CEQA documentation, to minimize City Planning commencement impacts on sensitive biological Commission/City of any ground Less than resources. Council disturbing Significant b. Specifications for the project boundary, Project activities or limits of grading, project related parking, Applicant/Developer vegetation storage areas, laydown sites, and removal equipment storage areas would be mapped and clearly marked in the field with temporary fencing, signs, stakes, flags, rope, cord, or other appropriate markers. All markers would be maintained until the completion of activities in that area. Travertine Final EIR 4-17 July 2024 973 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM c. To minimize the amount of disturbance, the construction/laydown activities, parking, staging, storage, spoil management, and equipment access will be restricted to designated areas. Designated areas will comprise existing disturbed areas (parking lots, access roads, graded areas, etc.) to the extent possible. d. Designated staging areas will be enclosed with temporary security fencing. All staging areas will comply with conditions in the Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan SWPPP), which provides BMPs to avoid or mitigate erosion impacts during construction. e. Project -related work limits would be defined and work crews would be restricted to designated work areas. Disturbance beyond the actual construction zone will be prohibited without site -specific surveys. If sensitive biological resources are detected in an area to be impacted, then appropriate measures would be implemented to avoid impacts (i.e., flag and avoid, erect orange construction fencing, biological monitor present during work, etc.). However, if avoidance is not possible and the sensitive biological resources would be directly impacted by project activities, the biologist would mark and/or stake the site(s) and map the individuals on an aerial map and with a Travertine Final EIR 4-18 July 2024 974 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Global Positioning System (GPS) unit. The biologist would then contact the appropriate resource agencies to develop additional avoidance, minimization and/or mitigation measures prior to commencing project activities. f. ESAs would be identified, mapped, clearly marked in the field, and avoided to the maximum extent practicable in order to avoid and minimize impacts on sensitive biological resources. g. Existing roads and trails would be utilized wherever possible to avoid unnecessary impacts. Project related vehicle traffic would be restricted to established roads, staging areas, and parking areas. Travel outside construction zones will be prohibited. h. Monitoring would occur periodically during the length of construction activities to ensure project limits, designated areas (parking, storage, etc.), and ESAs are still clearly marked. L Signs will be installed on boundaries of the Project Site and other strategic locations to notify the public of the sensitive biological resources identified onsite and prohibit entry into key high value habitat areas. Travertine Final EIR 4-19 July 2024 975 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BIO-26 Prior to construction, the construction area and adjacent habitat within 500 feet of the construction area, or to the edge of the property if less than 500 feet, will be surveyed by a Qualified Biologist for burrows that could be used by burrowing owl. Two (2) surveys will be conducted, with one survey to be conducted between 14 and 30 days prior to site disturbance, and a second survey to be conducted within 24 hours of site disturbance, following methods described in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (California Department of Fish and Game 2012). If a burrow is located, the Qualified Prior to issuance Biologist will determine if an owl is present in Qualified Biologist of grading permit the burrow. If the burrow is determined to be and occupied, the burrow will be flagged and a City Planning commencement 160-foot buffer during the non -breeding Commission/City of any ground Less than season and a 250-foot buffer during the Council disturbing Significant breeding season, or a buffer to the edge of activities or the property boundary if less than 500 feet, Project vegetation will be established around the burrow. The Applicant/Developer removal buffer will be staked and flagged. No construction will be permitted within the buffer until the young are no longer dependent on the burrow. If the burrow is unoccupied, the burrow will be made inaccessible to burrowing owls, and construction activities may proceed. If either a nesting or escape burrow is occupied, burrowing owls shall be relocated pursuant to accepted protocols and in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies (CDFW and USFWS). A burrow is assumed occupied if records indicate that, based on surveys conducted Travertine Final EIR 4-20 July 2024 976 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM following protocol, at least one burrowing owl has been observed occupying a burrow on site during the past three years. If there are no records for the site, surveys must be conducted to determine, prior to construction, if burrowing owls are present. Determination of the appropriate method of relocation, such as eviction/passive relocation or active relocation, shall be based on the specific site conditions (e.g., distance to nearest suitable habitat and presence of burrows within that habitat) in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. Active relocation and eviction/passive relocation require the preservation and maintenance of suitable burrowing owl habitat determined through coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. BIO-27 Prior to the start of construction activities in modeled Le Conte's thrasher habitat in the SRSJM Conservation Area, surveys will be Conducted by a Qualified Biologist on the construction site and within 500 feet of the Qualified Biologist construction site, or to the property boundary if less than 500 feet. If nesting Le Conte's City Planning Prior to the start thrashers are found, a 500-foot buffer, or to Commission/City of construction Less than the property boundary if less than 500 feet, Council activities during Significant will be established around the nest site. The nesting season buffer will be staked and flagged. No Project construction will be permitted within the Applicant/Developer buffer during the breeding season (January 15 through June 15) or until the young have fledged. BIO-28 Vegetation clearing shall be conducted outside Qualified Avian Outside of Less than of the peak nesting season, which is generally Biologist nesting season Significant identified as February 1 through August 31, to Travertine Final EIR 4-21 July 2024 977 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM the greatest extent feasible. Regardless of the City Planning time of year, nesting bird surveys shall be Commission/City performed by a qualified avian biologist no Council more than 3 days prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Pre- Project construction surveys shall focus on both Applicant/Developer direct and indirect evidence of nesting, including nest locations and nesting behavior. The qualified avian biologist will make every effort to avoid potential nest predation as a result of survey and monitoring efforts. If active nests are found during the pre - construction nesting bird surveys, a qualified biologist shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines and 500 feet for raptors. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. BIO-29 Drainage and Toxics: Project stormwater runoff City Planning Prior to approval Less than will be conveyed eastward toward the Dike 4 Commission/City of grading plans Significant Travertine Final EIR 4-22 July 2024 978 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM impound and away from Project surrounding open space, and SRSJM Conservation Area. Stormwater retention basins are designed to provide requisite water quality treatment, including bio-remediation. Subsequent engineering will include preparation of a SWPPP that will ensure against increased runoff and protect water quality during and post -construction. Council Project Applicant/Developer BIO-30 Artificial Lighting: Night lighting shall be directed away from adjacent open space and SRSJM Conservation Area to protect wildlife from direct night lighting. Light fixtures adjacent to open space will be shielded and utilize low intensity lighting. No nighttime lighting will be utilized on the nature trail and a curfew will be established for trail use from sunrise to sunset. Notice of the trail curfew will be posted at each trail entry point. If night lighting is required during construction, City Planning shielding shall be incorporated to ensure Commission/City ambient lighting adjacent conservation lands Council Prior to approval Less than are not increased. of Architectural Significant Throughout construction and the lifetime Project Review operations of the Project, the City and Project Applicant/Developer proponent shall eliminate all nonessential lighting throughout the Project area, including the selected offsite field utilities parcel, and avoid or limit the use of artificial light at night during the hours of dawn and dusk when many wildlife species are most active. The City shall ensure that all lighting for the Project is fully shielded, cast downward, reduced in intensity to the greatest extent possible, and does not result Travertine Final EIR 4-23 July 2024 979 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM in lighting trespass including glare into surrounding areas or upward into the night sky (see the International Dark -Sky Association standards at http://darksky.org/). The City and Project proponent shall ensure use of LED lighting with a correlated color temperature of 3,000 Kelvins or less, proper disposal of hazardous waste, and recycling of lighting that contains toxic compounds with a qualified recycler. City Planning BIO-31 Noise: The Project will incorporate setbacks, as Commission/City specified in the Specific Plan to minimize the Council Prior to approval Less than effects of noise on wildlife. of Tract Map Significant Project Applicant/Developer BIO-32 Unauthorized Access: The Project will City Planning incorporate signage, fencing, gates, and Commission/City similar measures and barriers to inform the Council Prior to approval Less than hiking public and to avoid or minimize of Architectural Significant unauthorized access to adjacent open space Project 1 Review lands. Applicant/Developer Travertine Final EIR 4-24 July 2024 •:1 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BIO-33 California Desert Native Plants Act: The applicant will collect California Desert Native Plan Act protected plants, including California barrel cactus (Ferocactus cylindraceus), Gander's buckhorn cholla (Cylindropuntia Riverside County ganderi), Englemann's hedgehog cactus Agriculture (Echinocereus engelmannii), cottontop cactus Commissioner (Echinocactus polycephalus), beavertail Prior to and cactus (Opuntia basilaris), branched pencil City Planning during collection Less than cholla (Cylindropuntia ramossissima), ocotillo Commission/City of California Significant (Fouquieria splendens), catclaw (Acacia Council Native plants greggii), blue paloverde (Parkinsonia florida), and smoke tree (Psorothamnus spinosus) and Project prioritize reuse of plant materials onsite. A Applicant/Developer permit from the Agriculture Commissioner of the County of Riverside shall be obtained prior to collection and relocation of these species. BIO-34 A general biological field survey to document existing conditions and the suitability of habitats within the utility field parcels to support special -status wildlife species such as Prior to any burrowing owl, which could potentially occur ground on -site. Regardless of focused surveyfindings, Qualified Biologist disturbance, one if suitable habitat for burrowing owl is no less than 14 present, two (2) separate preconstruction City Planning days prior to Less than surveys are required prior to any ground Department disturbance, and Significant disturbance, one no less than 14 days prior to Project Applicant/ the other within disturbance, and the other within 24 hours Developer 24 hours prior to prior to ground disturbance. ground Should take of burrowing owl be expected, a disturbance relocation plan and extensive coordination to move animals offsite can be expected. BIO-35: Le Conte's Thrasher. Le Conte's thrasher Qualified Avian Prior to Less than focused surveys shall be performed by a Biologist vegetation Significant Travertine Final EIR 4-25 July 2024 981 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM qualified avian biologist prior to vegetation removal or removal or ground -disturbing activities City Planning ground following methods outlined on pages 6-8 of Department disturbance the LeConte's Thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei) Status and Nest Site Requirements in the Project Applicant/ Coachella Valley (Hargrove, L. P. et al. 20204), Developer including the broadcast of song and calls by a qualified avian biologist with an appropriate permit. If active nests are found during the pre -construction nesting bird surveys, the qualified biologist shall inform CDFW and shall establish an appropriate nest buffer to be marked on the ground. Nest buffers are species specific and shall be at least 300 feet for passerines. A smaller or larger buffer may be determined by the qualified biologist familiar with the nesting phenology of the nesting species and based on nest and buffer monitoring results. Construction activities may not occur inside the established buffers, which shall remain on site until a qualified biologist determines the young have fledged or the nest is no longer active. Active nests and adequacy of the established buffer distance shall be monitored daily by the qualified biologist until the qualified biologist has determined the young have fledged or the Project has been completed. The qualified biologist has the authority to stop work if nesting pairs exhibit signs of disturbance. BIO-36: Burrowing Owl Avoidance: No less than 60 Qualified Biologist days prior to the start of Project -related No less than 60 activities, a burrowing owl habitat City Planning days prior to the Less than assessment shall be conducted within the Department start of Project- Significant Project site and surrounding area, including Project Applicant/ related activities Travertine Final EIR 4-26 July 2024 & 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM the selected off -site utility field parcel, by a Developer qualified biologist according to the specifications of the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (Department of Fish and Game, March 2012 or most recent version). Suitable habitat for burrowing owl has been identified within the Project site; therefore, focused burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted by a qualified biologist according to the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation prior to vegetation removal or ground -disturbing activities. Focused burrowing owl surveys shall also be conducted in all areas identified through a habitat assessment as being suitable habitat for burrowing owls at the selected off -site utility field parcel. If burrowing owls are detected during the focused surveys, the qualified biologist and Project proponent shall prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall describe proposed avoidance, minimization, mitigation, and monitoring actions. The Burrowing Owl Plan shall include the number and location of occupied burrow sites, acres of burrowing owl habitat that will be impacted, details of site monitoring, and details on proposed buffers and other avoidance measures if avoidance is proposed. If impacts to occupied burrowing owl habitat or burrow cannot be avoided, the Burrowing Owl Plan shall also describe minimization and Travertine Final EIR 4-27 July 2024 983 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM relocation actions that will be implemented. Proposed implementation of burrow exclusion and closure should only be considered as a last resort, after all other options have been evaluated as exclusion is not in itself an avoidance, minimization, or mitigation method and has the possibility to result in take. If impacts to occupied burrows cannot be avoided, information shall be provided regarding adjacent or nearby suitable habitat available to owls along with proposed relocation actions. The Project proponent shall implement the Burrowing Owl Plan following CDFW and USFWS review and approval. Preconstruction burrowing owl surveys shall be conducted no less than 14 days prior to the start of Project -related activities and within 24 hours prior to ground disturbance, in accordance with the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation (2012 or most recent version). Preconstruction surveys should be performed by a qualified biologist following the recommendations and guidelines provided in the Staff Report on Burrowing Owl Mitigation. If the preconstruction surveys confirm occupied burrowing owl habitat, Project activities shall be immediately halted. The qualified biologist shall coordinate with CDFW and prepare a Burrowing Owl Plan that shall be submitted to CDFW and USFWS for review and approval prior to commencing Project activities. BIO-37: All operation and maintenance activities CVWD During operation Less than relating to the Project's water tank facilities of water tanks Significant Travertine Final EIR 4-28 July 2024 984 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM will be designed and conducted in a manner City Planning consistent with the applicable mitigation Department measures in the 2015 Operations and Maintenance Manual for Coachella Valley Project Applicant/ Water District Covered Activities and Facilities Developer Within Conservation Areas. Avoidance and minimization measures include, but are not limited to: (i) the number of access routes, number and size of staging areas, and the total area of any operations and maintenance activities shall be limited to the minimum necessary to achieve the project goal; (ii) routes and boundaries outside the normal access roads shall be clearly delineated through fencing or flagging; (iii) if any CVWD employee inadvertently impacts a listed species or sensitive habitat during operations and maintenance activities, CVWD shall report the activity within 24 hours to CDFW. b. Have a Substantial BIO-38 Prior to the issuance of grading or building Adverse Effect on permits for the project, and prior to initiating any Riparian Habitat any work that may impact jurisdictional or Other Sensitive waters identified in the Travertine Project Natural Community Biological Resources Assessment, the Project- City Planning Identified in Local or specific Delineation of State and Federal Department Prior to issuance Regional Plans, Jurisdictional Waters, Michael Baker of grading or Policies, Regulations International, and the off -site utility field Project Applicant/ building Less than or by the California assessment prepared by Michael Baker Developer p permits/initiating Significant Department of Fish International, dated March 2022, June 2021, any work and Wildlife Service and June 2022, respectively, the Project CDFW proponent shall provide notice to CDFW and obtain a Lake and Streambed Alteration Agreement as required pursuant to California Fish and Game Code sections 1602-1616. Travertine Final EIR 4-29 July 2024 985 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM BIO-39 Impacts to CDFW jurisdictional waters shall be mitigated pursuant to a Habitat Mitigation and Monitoring Plan (HMMP) which will be prepared to identify specific on -site and/or off -site mitigation activities that will be implemented to compensate for unavoidable impacts to CDFW jurisdictional areas. The HMMP will identify the mitigation program coordinated with and approved by CDFW, set mitigation success criteria, and guide a five- year qualitative and quantitative mitigation City Planning monitoring program to track mitigation Department Prior to issuance success. Annual reports will be submitted to of grading or CDFW each year for five years, summarizing Project Applicant/ building Less than mitigation performance against the success Developer p permits/initiating Significant criteria. Impacts to non -riparian waters will any work be mitigated at a minimum 1:1 ratio. Impacts CDFW to riparian vegetation will be mitigated at a minimum 2:1 ratio. The HMMP will identify the mitigation program coordinated with and approved by CDFW, set mitigation success criteria, and guide a five-year qualitative and quantitative mitigation monitoring program to track mitigation success. Annual reports will be submitted to CDFW each year for five years, summarizing mitigation performance against the success criteria. BIO-40 Prior to construction of the Project, including Regulatory the offsite utility field, a jurisdictional Specialist delineation should be conducted to determine the presence or absence and City Planning Prior to Less than potential regulatory status of any Department construction Significant jurisdictional features should it be determined they may be impacted by Project Applicant/ installation of water wells and the electric Developer Travertine Final EIR 4-30 July 2024 K.U. 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM power substation within a proposed impact area. If Impacts to jurisdictional features are identified, the Project proponent shall comply with the regulatory requirements of the USACE, RWQCB and CDFW, as applicable, regarding required regulatory permits, including a Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement, Section 404 Permit, Section 401 Water Quality Certification. Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Project proponent shall implement the recommendations of the Project Drainage Study (DEIR, Appendix J.3) and in accordance with the recommendations of the Project Drainage Plan prior to issuance of a grading permit obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Project Proponent shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 4.4 Cultural Resources CR-1 Prior to any ground -disturbing activities, the Qualified Project applicant shall retain a qualified Archaeologist a. Adverse change to archaeologist, defined as an archaeologist Prior to any Historical Resources that meets the Secretary of Interior's City Planning ground- Less than b. Adverse change to Standards for professional archaeology, to Department disturbing Significant Archaeological carry out all mitigation measures related to activities Resources cultural resources. Tribal monitoring of site Project Applicant/ disturbance will also be accommodated. Developer CR-2 The Project applicant shall assign a Compliance Officer Prior to any compliance officer for the Project to ensure City Planning ground- Less than mitigation measures are in place and followed disturbing Significant for the duration of Project construction. The Department activities Travertine Final EIR 4-31 July 2024 987 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM compliance officer should prepare a monthly compliance report for distribution to the City, BOR, BLM, and interested Native American groups. The compliance officer may be the same person as the Project archaeologist or may be another qualified individual designated by the Project applicant. Project Applicant/ Developer CR-3 Prior to the commencement of ground disturbance, a Tribal Cultural Resources Monitoring and Mitigation Plan (Monitoring Plan) shall be prepared. The Monitoring Plan shall include, but not be limited to: principles and procedures for the identification of cultural resources monitoring protocols consistent with CR-1, CR-2 and CR-7 for Qualified ground -disturbing activities, a worker training Archaeologist program consistent with CR-6, and discovery Prior to the and processing protocols for inadvertent City Planning commencement Less than discoveries of cultural resources consistent Department of ground Significant with CR-7 and CR-8. The plan shall detail disturbance protocols for determining circumstances in Project Applicant/ which additional or reduced levels of Developer monitoring (e.g., spot checking) may be appropriate. Fencing with a buffer shall be placed around resources to be avoided. The Monitoring Plan shall also establish a protocol for communicating with the lead agencies and interested Native American parties. CR-4 Prior to ground -disturbing activities in any Qualified areas outside the APE described in the Project Archaeologist Prior to any EIR, Exhibit 4.5-1, including but not limited to ground- Less than locations proposed for the off -site utility field, City Planning disturbing Significant a supplemental study including an updated Department records search at the EIC, updated Sacred activities Lands File search, and pedestrian survey, shall Project Applicant/ Travertine Final EIR 4-32 July 2024 •:: 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM be conducted. If resources are identified and cannot be avoided, they shall be assessed for their eligibility for the NRHP and CRHR. Avoidance and minimization measures identified as a result of the study shall be incorporated into the Monitoring Plan. Developer CR-5 In the event of unanticipated discovery of NRHP- and CRHR-eligible resources within the APE or the off -site utility field, where operationally feasible, such resources shall be protected from direct project impacts by project redesign (i.e., relocation of the ground City Planning disturbance, ancillary facilities, or temporary Department During any facilities or work areas). Avoidance ground- Less than mechanisms shall include temporary fencing Project Applicant/ disturbing Significant and designation of such areas as Developer activities environmentally sensitive areas (ESAs) for the duration of the proposed Project. ESAs shall include the boundary of each historic property plus a 30-meter (98-foot) buffer around the resource. CR-6 Prior to the commencement of ground - disturbing activities, typically at the Project kick-off, the qualified archaeologist or their designee will provide cultural sensitivity Qualified training to construction crews. The training Archaeologist will provide information on signs of potential Prior to any cultural resources, regulatory requirements City Planning ground- Less than for the protection of cultural resources and Department disturbing Significant the proper procedures to follow should activities unanticipated cultural resources discoveries Project Applicant/ be made during construction. Workers will be Developer provided contact information and protocols to follow if inadvertent discoveries are made. Workers will be shown examples of the types Travertine Final EIR 4-33 July 2024 .;. 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM of tribal cultural resources that might be encountered and that would require notification of the project archaeologist. The Project archaeologist shall create a training video, PowerPoint presentation, or printed literature that can be shown to new workers and contractors for continuous training throughout the life of the Project. CR-7 Prior to ground disturbance, an archaeological monitor, working under the supervision of the qualified archaeologist, and Native American monitors from the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and the Torres Martinez Desert Cahuilla Indians, shall be retained to monitor ground -disturbing activities. Monitoring will take place within or near ESAs or in other areas agreed upon by Qualified the archaeologist, City, and Native American Archaeologist monitor, and as identified in the Monitoring Plan. Monitoring activities will include Native American examining the excavation of native soils as Monitors Prior to any ground- Less than well as the disposal of spoils in certain areas. The duration, timing and location of the City Planning disturbing Significant monitoring shall be determined by the City in Department activities consultation with the qualified archaeologist and Native American monitors as outlined in Project Applicant/ the Monitoring Plan. Should buried cultural Developer deposits be encountered, the Monitor may request that destructive construction halt and the Monitor shall notify a Qualified Archaeologist (Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines) to investigate and, if necessary, prepare a mitigation plan for submission to the State Historic Preservation Officer. Additionally, fencing with a buffer Travertine Final EIR 4-34 July 2024 W 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM shall be required around resources to be avoided. CR-8 In the event that cultural resources are exposed during excavation, work in the immediate vicinity of the find must stop until a qualified archaeologist can evaluate the significance of the find. Ground -disturbing activities may continue in other areas. For discoveries located outside of BLM land, if the City determines, in consideration of the subsequent analysis by the qualified archaeologist, that the resource is a protected resource under CEQA (Section 15064.5f; PRC 21082) additional work such as testing or data Qualified recovery may be warranted prior to Archaeologist resumption of ground -disturbing activity in Prior to any the location of discovery. For discoveries City Planning ground- Less than located on BLM-land, if the BLM determines, Department disturbing Significant in consideration of the subsequent analysis by activities the qualified archaeologist, that the resource Project Applicant/ is protected under Section 106 of the NHPA, Developer additional work such as testing or data recovery may be warranted prior to resumption of ground -disturbing activity in the location of discovery. Should any tribal cultural resources be encountered, additional consultation with California Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC)—listed tribal groups should be conducted in coordination with the City and/or with the BLM and BOR if the discovery occurs on federal lands. c. Disturb human CR-9 If human remains are encountered, pursuant During any remains to State of California Health and Safety Code County Coroner ground- Less than Section 7050.5, no further disturbance shall disturbing Significant occur until the Riverside County Coroner has activities Travertine Final EIR 4-35 July 2024 991 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM made a determination of origin and City Planning disposition pursuant to PRC Section 5097.98. Department The Riverside County Coroner must be notified of the find immediately. Additional Project Applicant/ procedures for responding to the Developer unanticipated discovery of human remains are outlined below. Modern Remains If the Coroner's Office determines the remains are of modern origin, the appropriate law enforcement officials will be called by the Coroner and conduct the required procedures. Work will not resume until law enforcement has released the area. Archaeological Remains If the remains are determined to be archaeological in origin, the appropriate protocol is determined by whether the discovery site is located on federally or non - federally owned or managed lands. Remains Discovered on Federally Owned or Managed Lands After the Coroner has determined that the remains are archaeological or historic in age, the appropriate BLM Palm Springs Field Office or BOR archaeologist must be called. The archaeologist will initiate the proper procedures under the Archaeological Resources Protection Act and the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA). If the remains can be determined to be Native American, the steps as outlined in NAGPRA, 43 Code of Federal Travertine Final EIR 4-36 July 2024 a 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Regulations [CFR] 10.6 Inadvertent discoveries, must be followed. Resumption of Activity: The activity that resulted in the discovery of human remains on federal lands may resume after a written, binding agreement is executed between the BLM or BOR and federally recognized affiliated Indian Tribe(s) that adopts a recovery plan for the excavation or removal of the human remains, funerary objects, sacred objects, or objects of cultural patrimony following 43 CFR Section 10.3(b)(1) of these regulations. The disposition of all human remains and NAGPRA items shall be carried out following 43 CFR 10.6. Remains Discovered on Non -Federally Owned/Managed Lands After the Coroner has determined the remains on non -federally owned or managed lands are archaeological, the Coroner will make recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the remains to the person responsible for the excavation or discovery, or to his or her authorized representative. If the Coroner believes the remains to be those of a Native American, he/she shall contact the California NAHC by telephone within 24 hours. The NAHC will notify the person it believes to be the most likely descendant (MLD) of the remains. The MLD has 48 hours after accessing the site of the discovery to make recommendations to the landowner for treatment or disposition of the human remains. If the MLD does not make recommendations within 48 hours, the Travertine Final EIR 4-37 July 2024 993 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM landowner shall reinter the remains in an area of the property secure from further disturbance. If the landowner does not accept the descendant's recommendations, the owner or the descendent may request mediation by the NAHC Section 4.6, Geology and Soils GEO-1 The Project developer shall implement the seismic design criteria and parameters, in a. Expose people or accordance with ASCE 7-16 and 2019 CBC, as set forth in the Project geotechnical City Engineering structures to evaluation. Department potential substantial Less than adverse effects GEO-2 The design of foundation and slabs (including Project Applicant/ During... Significant involving: bearing pressure recommendations) shall be Developer ii. Strong seismic in conformance with the recommendations of ground shaking the Project structural engineer and as set d. located on expansive forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. soil iii. Seismic -related GEO-3 Grading and excavations shall be performed ground failure, in accordance with the City of La Quinta Code including and regulations and the General Earthwork liquefaction and Grading Specifications set forth in the c. Located on an Geotechnical Evaluation. Clearing and Project Geologist Unstable Geologic grubbing of the site shall include removal of Unit any pavement or concrete, turf, landscaping, City Engineering miscellaneous trash and debris, and disposal Department During grading Less than of deleterious material offsite. The soil and excavating Significant engineering properties of imported soil (if Project Applicant/ any) shall be evaluated and certified by the Developer Project geologist for use at the development site. GEO-4 Unsuitable earth materials shall be removed prior to placement of compacted fill. Travertine Final EIR 4-38 July 2024 994 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Unsuitable materials at the site include undocumented fills and weathered alluvial fan deposits as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation and as otherwise directed by the Project geologist. Excavation and grading to carry Project - serving roadways over the Dike No. 4 levee for the proposed Avenue 62 and Madison Street extensions, as well the Jefferson Street extension over the Dike No. 2 levee, should bench into competent existing fills on the sides with minimal removals on the top (1 to 2 feet). Grading on the levee fill shall be performed under the direction and concurrence of the US Bureau of Reclamation and CVWD. GEO-5 Where project soils require, they shall be overexcavated during grading to be replaced with compacted fill, as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. The proposed grading is anticipated to expose cut and fill transitions at finish grade. Shallow fill areas and cut portions of lots should be overexcavated and replaced with compacted fill to provide a minimum of 4 feet of uniform fill cap over each lot. Streets should be overexcavated 2 feet below subgrade to provide uniform fill below the pavement section. Alternatively, and as recommended by the Project geologist, streets may be overexcavated 2 feet below the deepest utility to reduce the amount of oversize materials encountered and facilitate utility excavation/installation. Travertine Final EIR 4-39 July 2024 995 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM iv. landslides GEO-4 Unsuitable earth materials shall be removed prior to placement of compacted fill. Unsuitable materials at the site include undocumented fills and weathered alluvial fan deposits as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation and as otherwise directed by the Project geologist. Project Geologist City Engineering Department Project Applicant/ Developer During grading and excavating Less than Significant GEO-6 Rockfall hazard analysis should be performed during the design phase if structures are Project Geologist planned within 100 feet of these hillsides (i.e., Coral Mountain and Martinez Rockslide) once City Engineering During design Less than plans are further developed to evaluate this Department phase Significant hazard and provide site -specific mitigation recommendations (i.e., impact walls or Project Applicant/ berms/channels), as required. Developer GEO-7 Slopes shall be engineered for stability, including during seismic events, to reduce potential slope failure hazards, as set forth in the Project geotechnical evaluation. GEO-8 Manufactured Slope Maintenance and Protection. To reduce the erosion and surficial Project slumping potential of the graded slopes, Geotechnical permanent manufactured slopes shall be Engineer protected from erosion by concrete lining, City Engineering During design Less than riprap, groundcover planting or other Department phase Significant appropriate method (i.e., jute matting, polymer coating, etc.) as approved by the project Applicant/ Project geologist. These measures shall be Developer applied as soon as practicable. Drainage shall be designed and maintained to collect surface waters and direct them away from manufactured slopes and as required by the Project geologist. Travertine Final EIR 4-40 July 2024 M. 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM GEO-9 Structural setbacks, including those for retaining walls, shall be established as prescribed by the Project geotechnical engineer. b. Erosion GEO-10 The project proponent shall comply with the most current Construction General Permit (CGP) (Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012- 0006-DWQ). Compliance with the CGP involves the development and implementation of a Project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which is designed to reduce potential adverse impacts to surface water quality during the period of construction. The SWPPP may include, but is not limited to, the following BMPs: City Planning & • Temporary Soil Stabilization: sandbag Engineering barriers, straw bale barriers, sediment Department Prior to the Less than traps, and fiber rolls; issuance of Significant Project Applicant/ grading permits • Temporary Sediment Control: hydraulic mulch and geotextiles; Developer • Wind Erosion Control: watering of the construction site, straw mulch; • Tracking Control: staging/storage area and street sweeping; • Non-stormwater Management: clear water diversion and dewatering; and • Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control: vehicle and equipment cleaning, concrete waste management, and contaminated soil management. Travertine Final EIR 4-41 July 2024 997 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM d. located on expansive GEO-11 Expansion Potential. The expansion potential soil of the on -site soils is low to very low. In accordance with the Project geotechnical City Public Works Following evaluation recommendations, additional Department completion of Less than laboratory testing shall be performed grading Significant following completion of grading operations to Project Developer operations verify the expansion potential of the near - surface soils. f. Destroy a unique GEO-12 A qualified professional paleontologist shall paleontological prepare a Paleontological Resources resource or site or Monitoring and Mitigation Plan and a Qualified Prior to Less than unique geologic Worker's Environmental Awareness Program Paleontologist development Significant feature to train the construction crew, both to be implemented during development. Section 4.7, GHG-1: Prior to the issuance of occupancy permits, the Greenhouse Gas project applicant shall purchase a minimum of Emissions approximately 408,720 MTCO2e credits (approximately 13,624 MTCO2e per year for a. GHG Emissions that 30 years). The purchase of carbon credits may Significantly must be made from a CARE -approved carbon Impact the registry with independent third -party Environment verification. Examples of approved registries City Planning Prior to the include the American Carbon Registry, Department issuance of Significant and Climate Action Reserve, and Verra. The occupancy Unavoidable applicant shall submit documentation of the Project Applicant permits offset purchase to the City demonstrating that it mitigates a minimum of approximately 13,624 MTCO2e per year (408,720 MTCO2e over a 30-year period), priorto any occupancy of the site. Alternatively, the project applicant may submit a GHG reduction plan to the City for approval that achieves an equal level of GHG reduction outlined herein. The GHG plan Travertine Final EIR 4-42 July 2024 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM must include enforceable actions that reduce GHG emissions to at or below the total mitigated values presented herein. GHG-2 All residences shall incorporate roof -top solar panels, in -home batteries and EV charger stations to facilitate use of EVs, golf carts and other low -speed electric vehicles (LSEVs). GHG-3 All planned single-family homes to be electric - ready and shall include electrical circuits for space heating, water heating, cooking/ovens, and clothes dryers, electrical panel, branch circuits, and transfer switch for battery storage. GHG-4 Dedicated circuits and panels in residential and commercial buildings shall be provided to easily convert from natural gas to electric in the future. GHG-5 All non-residential components of the development where vehicle parking is provides shall also provide EV chargers. GHG-6 All household and other appliances shall be of the highest energy efficiency rating, such as Energy Star, practicable at the time of purchase. GHG-7 To limit and reduce energy use associated with water consumption, all project landscaping shall be desert and other drought tolerant vegetation. The use of turf shall be kept to a minimum. GHG-8 All HVAC systems shall be Very High Efficiency HVAC (SEER 16/80% AFUE or 9 HSPF) or greater efficiency. Travertine Final EIR 4-43 July 2024 • • • 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM GHG-9 All domestic hot water systems shall be Very High Efficiency Water Heater (0.92 Energy Factor) with Enhanced Solar Pre -heat System (min. 0.35 Net Solar Fraction). GHG-10 All potable water fixtures shall have EPA WaterSense Certification or greater efficiency. Section 4.9, Hazards HAZ-1 Prior to grading, Limited Phase II Subsurface and Hazardous Investigation shall be required. The Limited Materials Phase II Subsurface Investigation shall be conducted by an Environmental Professional a&b. The proposed as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR Part Project would result 312. in SI related to the • Per Section 312.10, an Environmental transport, use, or Professional is an environmental disposal of hazardous materials during consultant that has an accredited Environmental construction and education in earth or natural science, at professional least five years of formal training under operation; d. sites listed pursuant another environmental professional, a City Planning & y g Less than to Government Code professional state license, and maintains Engineering Prior to grading Significant Section 65962.5. expert knowledge in the environmental Department geology, sustainability, and engineering fields. Project Applicant • If chemicals exceeding regulatory thresholds are identified during the Phase II study, the Project will develop a Soils Management Plan. The Phase II study will be conducted pursuant to ASTM E1903-19 industry standards. HAZ-2 A site -specific Soils Management Plan (SMP) shall be developed by an Environmental Professional for the Project property if Travertine Final EIR 4-44 July 2024 1000 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM chemical levels exceeding regulatory thresholds are identified during the Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation. The SMP shall be implemented during excavation and grading of the Project, and describe the protocol for managing (potentially contaminated) soils and disposing of (potentially hazardous) debris, as well as guidelines for handling known and/or undocumented subsurface features if discovered. HAZ-3 All agricultural related debris, materials, and foundations shall be removed and hauled to City Planning & an appropriate landfill prior to land Engineering disturbance in the previous vineyard area. If Department Less than significant soil staining is found at previous Didi During grang Significant storage locations, stained soil shall be Project Applicant excavated and disposed of in an approved landfill. HAZ-4 In compliance with the Construction General Permit (CGP) (Order No. 2009-009-DWQ as amended by 2010-0014-DWQ and 2012- 0006-DWQ), the Project shall develop and implement a project -specific Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for City Planning & construction of the project. The SWPPP shall Engineering include comprehensive handling, storage, and Department Prior to the Less than management procedures for building Project Applicant/ issuance its grading permits Significant materials, especially those that are hazardous Developer and toxic. The designation of staging areas for activities (i.e., fueling and maintaining vehicles, mixing paints, plaster, mortar, etc.), and storage of hazardous materials (i.e., paints, solvents, pesticides, fuels, oils, etc.) shall be determined in the SWPPP. Best Travertine Final EIR 4-45 July 2024 1001 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM management practices (BMPs) are required in the SWPPP that demonstrate proper material delivery and storage; material use; and spill prevention and control. The SWPPP may include, but is not limited to, the following BMPs: • Temporary Soil Stabilization: sandbag barriers, straw bale barriers, sediment traps, and fiber rolls; • Temporary Sediment Control: hydraulic mulch and geotextiles; • Wind Erosion Control: watering of the construction site, straw mulch; • Tracking Control: staging/storage area and street sweeping; • Non-stormwater Management: clear water diversion and dewatering; and • Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control: vehicle and equipment cleaning, concrete waste management, and contaminated soil management. Lastly, and upon project completion of construction, all hazardous materials shall be removed from the project site and a Notice of Termination (NOT) shall be filed with the Regional Water Quality Control Board. HAZ-5 Prior to the development of the golf facility RCFD storage and maintenance facilities, the Prior to the applicant shall provide a Hazardous Materials City Planning & development of Less than Business Plan (HMBP) to the Riverside County Engineering the golf facility Significant Fire Department for review and approval, if Department necessary. The HMBP shall be kept up to date Travertine Final EIR 4-46 July 2024 1002 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM in a location on -site and be available for Project Applicant/ review by the Riverside County Fire Developer Department, as needed. HAZ-6 Should any component of the proposed Project require the storage or handling of hazardous materials in quantities greater than or equal to 55 gallons of a liquid County of Riverside substance, 500 pounds of a solid substance, DEH or 200 cubic feet of compressed gas, it shall be required to follow the procedures City Planning established in Chapter 6.95 of the HSC, which Department Prior to business Less than requires any business handling and/or storing Significant a hazardous material shall obtain a permit Project Applicant/ from the DEH and electronically submit a Developer business plan in the Statewide Informational Management System, under the administration of the County of Riverside DEH. City Planning & HAZ-7 If onsite wells are determined to be Engineering inoperable, they shall be properly capped and Department Less than abandoned prior to grading activities in the Pi ror to grading Significant existing wellsite areas. Project Applicant/ Developer City Planning & HAZ-8 The Project shall consult an asbestos inspection Engineering consultant for a comprehensive asbestos survey Department Prior to Less than prior to demolition of the project site. demolition Significant Project Applicant/ Developer Section 4.10 Hydrology HWQ-1 The Operations and Maintenance (O&M) plan CVWD Prior to approval Less than and Water Quality shall include provisions to monitor and remove of final design Significant sediment along the west bank to maintain the Travertine Final EIR 4-47 July 2024 1003 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM civ. Impede or redirect flood flows d. risk release of pollutants due to project inundation required conveyance and freeboard conditions. Other aspects of the bank maintenance shall be identified based on the final design configuration of the systems. A Flood Control Facilities Operations and Maintenance Manual for the proposed improvements shall be prepared and submitted to CVWD for review and approval. The manual shall meet the requirements of Section 5.8.9 of the Development Design Manual. City Public Works and Engineering Department Project Applicant/Developer Section 4.11, Noise N0I-1 Grading and building plans shall require project construction activities comply with a. Generation of noise the City of La Quinta Municipal Code levels in excess of requirements pertaining to construction established noise. standards N0I-2 During all project site construction, the b. Generation of construction contractors shall equip all excessive construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with groundborne properly operating and maintained mufflers, Prior to the vibration consistent with manufacturers standards. City Planning & approval of The construction contractor shall place all Public Works grading plans stationary construction equipment so that Department and/or issuance Less than emitted noise is directed away from the noise of building Significant sensitive receivers nearest the project site. Project Applicant/ permits N0I-3 The construction contractor shall locate Developer equipment staging in areas that will create the greatest distance between construction - related noise sources and noise -sensitive receivers nearest the project site during all project construction. N0I-4 The construction contractor shall limit construction haul truck deliveries to the hours permitted by the City of La Quinta. The contractor shall also design delivery routes to Travertine Final EIR 4-48 July 2024 1004 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM minimize the exposure of sensitive land uses or residential dwellings to delivery truck - related noise. N0I-5 Prior to water well drilling, the construction City Planning & contractor shall provide a temporary 24-foot- Public Works Prior to water high noise barrier capable of reducing noise Department p well drilling Less than during well construction activities to 80 dBA Leq Significant or less. Project Applicant/ Developer Section 4.14, Public PS-1: Travertine Fire Master Plan (FMP) was Services developed to analyze emergency access to the Project and determine and implement a. Fire Protection strategies at the Project site to improve RCFD and CAL Fire operations and service delivery. The FMP and Addendum FMP were required to be prepared to address adequate fire protection for the area and mitigate potentially unacceptable response times in RCFD the interior of the Project. The FMP further states that conformance to the full circulation City Fire & Building Prior to issuance plan is required for any additional Department of Occupancy Less than development beyond Phase 1 of the Project. Permit Significant The later phases of development would Project include the improvement of Jefferson Street, Applicant/Developer which would provide emergency access to the Project. Full buildout of the Project is evaluated in the Addendum FMP. The Project applicant shall implement the safety measures established in the Travertine Fire Master Plan which include the following: • approved emergency access points; Travertine Final EIR 4-49 July 2024 1005 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • roadway design standards for fire protection vehicles; • minimum water quantity and pressure necessary for firefighting; All developer plans showing fire system connections shall provide information on the type of fire system that is being installed for the development (e.g., wet -pipe fire sprinkler systems, deluge fire sprinkler systems and dry pipe and precaution fire systems). A fire flow of 2,375 gallons per minute for 2- hour duration at 20 psi shall be required at the Project in accordance with Appendix B of the California Fire Code. For residential areas, approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection, with no portion of any lot frontage more than a maximum of 500 feet from the hydrant shall be provided. Minimum fire flow for all residential structures shall be 875 gallons per minute for a 1-hour duration at 20 psi operating pressure. Fire hydrant spacing shall be in accordance with Appendix C of the California Fire Code. Both requirements must be available prior to placing any combustible materials on the job site. The fire system plans shall be submitted to CVWD to review the complexity and type of proposed fire system. PS-2: The Addendum to the Fire Master Plan ensures adequate fire protection for the area through the following enhanced mitigation measures. • building construction standards; Travertine Final EIR 4-50 July 2024 1006 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • emergency power facilities for the proposed booster stations; • an area of refuge; • optic -con sensors located to open gates ahead of fire engine arrival; • implementation of a community emergency response team (FEMA) programs; and HOA/community training for CPR and AED and risk reduction programs. Section 4.13, Mitigation Measures Transportation TRA-1 Project mitigation may include a combination of a fair share of fee payments to the affected a. Conflict with an jurisdiction, construction of specific applicable plan or improvements and reimbursement to the policy addressing Project proponent to account for proponent the circulation fair share of improvement, or a combination system of these approaches. The Summary of 2040 c. Increase hazards Intersection Improvements (Table 4.16-26) due to a geometric are set forth below, are feasible and will City Public Works Prior to the design feature mitigate Project impacts for all three access Department issuance of Less than d. Result in inadequate options discussed above to levels that are less grading and Significant emergency access than significant. Project Applicant building permits. The following improvements are recommended by the TIA: • Monroe Street at Avenue 52(#14) — Install traffic signal control; Provide separate northbound left turn lane, provide second northbound through lane. Travertine Final EIR 4-51 July 2024 1007 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • Monroe Street at Avenue 60 (#10) — Construct traffic signal improvements for eventual reimbursement via the City of La Quinta. In addition to General Plan geometrics, provide the following lanes: ■ SB Approach: Provide separate right turn lane ■ EB Approach: Provide separate right turn lane with right turn overlap phase ■ WB Approach: Provide 2nd through lane • Madison Street at Avenue 58 (#1) — Install traffic signal control; provide second eastbound through lane. In addition to General Plan geometrics, provide the following lanes: EB Approach: Convert inside through lane into 2nd left turn lane. • Madison Street at Avenue 54 (0) — Install traffic signal control; Convert eastbound de facto right turn lane into free right turn lane. • Jefferson Street at Avenue 50 (#8) — Provide second westbound through lane. (This intersection is located in both the City of La Quinta and the City of Indio. The proposed improvement is in the City of Indio.) Travertine Final EIR 4-52 July 2024 1008 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • Jefferson Street at Avenue 54 (#6) — Install traffic signal control, convert 2nd eastbound through lane into right turn lane, provide westbound right turn overlap phasing. • Monroe Street at Avenue 58 (#11) — Install traffic signal control, provide separate northbound left turn lane, provide separate northbound right turn lane, provide separate southbound left turn lane, provide separate eastbound left turn lane, provide separate westbound left turn lane; Provide separate northbound left turn lane. In addition to General Plan geometrics, provide the following lanes: ■ NB Approach: Provide 2nd left turn lane, add right turn overlap phase to right turn lane ■ SB Approach: Provide 2nd left turn lane ■ EB Approach: Provide separate right turn lane • Monroe Street at Airport Blvd (#12) — Install traffic signal control • Monroe Street at Avenue 54 (#13) — Install traffic signal control, provide separate southbound left turn lane, provide separate westbound left turn lane; provide second northbound through lane, provide second southbound through lane. Travertine Final EIR 4-53 July 2024 1009 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • Jefferson Street at Avenue 52 (#7) — reconstruct the current roundabout design to incorporate 2 circulating lanes around the center island to accommodate an additional through lane in the northbound and southbound directions. • Jackson Street at Avenue 58 (#18) — Install traffic signal control (This intersection is located in the County of Riverside). • Jackson Street at Airport Boulevard (#19)— Install traffic signal control. (This intersection is located in the County of Riverside). • Monroe Street at Avenue 62 (#9) — Install traffic signal control, provide northbound shared left -through -right lane, provide separate eastbound left turn lane, provide separate westbound right turn lane. (This intersection is located in the City of La Quinta at the northwest corner, and in the County of Riverside at the northeast, southwest and southeast corners). In addition to General Plan geometrics, provide the following lanes: ■ SB Approach: Provide 2nd left turn lane, add right turn overlap phase to existing right turn lane ■ EB Approach: Convert through - right lane into left -through -right lane Travertine Final EIR 4-54 July 2024 1010 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM ■ WB Approach: Provide separate left turn lane • Jackson Street at Avenue 62 (#16) — Install traffic signal control. (This intersection is located in the County of Riverside.) • Jackson Street at Avenue 60 (#17) — Provide traffic signal. (This intersection is located in the County of Riverside.) TRA-2: Traffic Control Plan Prior to obtaining a grading permit, the applicant shall prepare and submit the City of La Quinta for review and approval detailed construction traffic management plans, including street closure information, detour plans, haul routes, and staging plans as necessary for any off -site work that would encroach on public right-of-way. The construction traffic management plans shall include the following elements, as appropriate: • Provisions for temporary traffic control during all construction activities adjacent to public right-of-way to improve traffic flow on public roadways (e.g., flag person); • Construction -related vehicles shall not park on surrounding public streets; • Provision of safety precautions for pedestrians and bicyclists through such measures as alternate routing and protection barriers; Travertine Final EIR 4-55 July 2024 1011 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • Schedule construction -related deliveries to reduce travel during peak travel periods; • Obtain the required permits for truck haul routes from the County of Riverside, the City of Rancho Mirage, the City of Palm Desert, and Cathedral City prior to the issuance of any permit for the project; and • Obtain a Caltrans transportation permit for use of oversized transport vehicles on Caltrans facilities. • Outline adequate measures to ensure emergency vehicle access during all aspects of the project's construction, including, but not limited to, the use of flagmen during partial closures to streets surrounding the project site to facilitate the traffic flow until construction is complete. Include the implementation of security measures during construction in areas that are accessible to the general public to help reduce any increased demand on law enforcement services, including fencing construction areas, providing security lighting, and providing security personnel to patrol construction sites. Travertine Final EIR 4-56 July 2024 1012 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Section 4.17, Tribal Cultural Resources a. Cause substantial Qualified adverse change in Archaeologist significance of tribal cultural resource Native American Prior to and that is Monitors during ground Less than i. A site listed in the See CR-1 through CR-9 disturbing CRHR or Local City Planning activities Significant Register, Tribal Department Cultural Resources ii. A resource Project Applicant/ determined to be Developer significant to a California Native American tribe. Section 4.18, Utilities CVWD and Service Systems City Public Works a. stormwater impact See HWQ-1 and Engineering Prior to approval Less than Department of final design Significant Project Applicant/Developer Travertine Final EIR 4-57 July 2024 1013 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM Table 4-2 Travertine Specific Plan Amendment Project Design Features Project Design Features 4.1 Aesthetics PDF AES-1 All construction equipment will be stored onsite within a designated area that is fenced with opaque construction fencing in order to reduce temporary visual impacts. Construction waste will be stored in an area that is accessible to weekly refuse pick up. All construction waste will be taken to a recycling center. PDF AES-2 The Avenue 62 crossing over Dike No. 4 shall include a concrete barrier at the edge of the right-of-way of Avenue 62 over Dike No. 4. The concrete barrier shall be embossed in an aesthetically pleasing manner to further blend the crossing of Avenue 62 with its surroundings. 4.2 Air Quality PDF AQ-1 To reduce water demands and associated energy use, subsequent development proposals within the Project property would be required to implement a Water Conservation Strategy and demonstrate a minimum 20% reduction in indoor and outdoor water usage, consistent with the current CalGreen Building Code performance standards for residential and non-residential land uses, achieved in part through the schedule of plumbing fixtures and fixture fittings that will reduce indoor use and efficient irrigation systems for outdoor use. PDF AQ-2 In order to reduce the amount of waste disposed at landfills, the Project would be required to implement a 50% waste diversion as required by AB 939. 4.2 Air Quality PDF 131O-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Project proponent shall implement the recommendations of the Project Drainage Study (DEIR, Appendix J.3) and in accordance with the recommendations of the Project Drainage Plan prior to issuance of a grading permit obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Project Proponent shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 4.6 Energy Resources PDF ENR-1 The Project shall, consistent with the Specific Plan Amendment incorporate complementary land uses near one another in order to decrease VMTs since trips between land use types are shorter and may be accommodated by non -auto modes of transport. Travertine Final EIR sm July 2024 1014 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PDF ENR-2 The Project property includes sidewalk connections, trail networks (i.e., strolling trails, Community Grand Loop trail, and interconnector trails), and a Class II bike path. The sidewalk connections, trails, and bike paths would minimize barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. PDF ENR-3 The Project will be required to implement Title 24's Residential Mandatory Measures and Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 20) in effect at the time of construction, which require the installation of solar photovoltaic systems to newly constructed, low-rise residential buildings, high efficiency lighting, and application of energy efficient design building shells and building components, such as windows, roof systems, electrical lighting systems, and heating, ventilating and air conditioning systems. PDF ENR-4 The Project will install water -efficient plumbing fixtures and irrigation systems, LED technology, and drought - tolerant plants in landscaping. 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions PDF GHG-1 The Project will consider the solar orientation of buildings to reduce impact of the development with natural environment. PDF GHG-2 The Project will implement passive and active solar systems to take advantage and consider the year -around abundant sunshine. 4.8 Greenhouse Gas Emissions PDF HWQ-1 The Grand Loop Trail may from, time to time, be declared temporarily closed due to heightened public safety concerns, with entry restricted or prohibited. Public safety conditions may include, but are not limited to, wet conditions, natural debris, or seasonal closure. PDF HWQ-2 Prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval, the Project proponent shall obtain coverage under the NPDES General Permit for Storm Water Discharges Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities (Construction General Permit). Project construction shall comply with all applicable requirements specified in the Construction General Permit, including but not limited to, preparation of a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), a signed certification statements, and any other compliance -related documents required by the permit, to the State Water Resources Control Board. Travertine Final EIR 4-59 July 2024 1015 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM PDF HWQ-3 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the Project proponent shall implement the recommendations of the Project Drainage Study (DEIR, Appendix J.3) and in accordance with the recommendations of the Project Drainage Plan prior to issuance of a grading permit obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The Project Proponent shall obtain a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy. 4.11 Land Use and Planning PDF LU-1 Consistent with the Travertine Specific Plan Amendment, the Project will offer a variety of housing and recreational amenities. The housing sizes and styles will be designed to meet the needs of all age groups. The recreational amenities will include a 5-mile-long public trail that will be developed around the perimeter of the Project property; a central private spine trail that bisects the residential areas of the property; on -street bike paths; preservation of natural open space; additional private parks located within the development area; a skills golf course and golf academy; and a resort and spa with restaurants, shops and activities. 4.14 Public Services PDF PS-1 The Project and residential areas shall be gated, with the intention of increasing community security and minimizing potential crimes, and consistent with standard operations of resort communities, the proposed resort will incorporate private security services to maximize security of the overall Project. Additionally, lighting features throughout the Project will enhance security and maximize visibility within the Project streets, intersections, and other crosswalks. PDF PS-2 All water mains and fire hydrants providing the required fire flows will be constructed in accordance with the City Fire Code Appendix B and Appendix C in effect at the time of development. 4.16 Transportation PDF TR-1 The project will implement marketing strategies to optimize interaction between on -site resort and residential uses. Information sharing and marketing are important components to successful trip reduction strategies. Marketing strategies will include: • Resident member benefits that include use of the resort amenities • Event promotions Travertine Final EIR m July 2024 1016 4.0 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM • Publications PDF TR-2 The Project property includes sidewalk connections and would minimize barriers to pedestrian access and interconnectivity. Travertine Final EIR 4-61 July 2024 1017 ATTACHMENT 1 Vicinity Map s PrA WEST AVENUE 58 AVENUE 60 4 TRILOGY LA QUINTA & + o � � AVENUE 62 N T5 PROJECT SITE a AVENUE sa 1018 ATTACHMENT 2 PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NUMBERS: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2017-0008, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2017-0002, ZONE CHANGE 2017-0002, SPECIFIC PLAN 2017-0004, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2017-0008 (TTM 37387) AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0001 APPLICANT: TRG LAND, INC REQUEST: CONSIDER RESOLUTIONS RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE ABOVE LISTED APPLICATIONS TO FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT OF 1,200 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, A 45,000 SQUARE - FOOT HOTEL WITH 100 RESORT VILLAS, GOLF TRAINING FACILITY, CLUBHOUSE AND BANQUET RESTAURANT, AND RECREATIONAL TRAILS AND PARKS LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 60, NORTH OF AVENUE 64, WEST OF MADISON STREET CEQA: DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS PREPARED AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THIS PROJECT PER THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT GENERALPLAN DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, TOURIST COMMERCIAL, GENERAL COMMERCIAL, OPEN SPACE - RECREATION, OPEN SPACE -NATURAL ZONING DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, TOURIST COMMERCIAL, NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL, GOLF COURSE, OPEN SPACE SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, MAJOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES, OPEN SPACE; VACANT PRIVATE AND PUBLIC LAND, CVWD RECHARGE PONDS, CORAL MOUNTAIN SOUTH: OPEN SPACE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JURISDICTION; MARTINEZ SLIDE, VACANT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LAND EAST: MEDIUM HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, OPEN SPACE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JURISDICTION; VACANT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LAND, DIKE #4, TRILOGY DEVELOPMENT WEST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, OPEN SPACE, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE JURISDICTION; VACANT PUBLIC AND PRIVATE LAND 1019 ATTACHMENT 3 MEMORANDUM TO: Lisa Hofmann Morgan DATE: July 27, 2023 Travertine Corporation c/o Hofmann Land Development Co. FROM: Roger Dale, Managing Principal FILE: #4083 The Natelson Dale Group, Inc. (TNDG) SUBJECT: Fiscal Impact Analysis (FIA) for Proposed Travertine Development TNDG has completed an analysis of the potential fiscal impacts of the Proposed Travertine Development ("Project") on the City of La Quinta. This memorandum summarizes the FIA conclusions and methodology. The analysis reflects direction from City staff regarding key FIA assumptions, methodology and format. Scope of the FIA The FIA focuses primarily on annually -recurring impacts to the City's General Fund. The analysis covers a 20-year projection horizon, with full buildout of the Project assumed to occur in Year 7 of the forecast period. As further documented in the attached data tables, the FIA reflects the following inputs: • Per capita cost/revenue factors have been derived from the adopted City of La Quinta Budget for Fiscal Year 2022-2023. • Projected infrastructure maintenance costs include Project -specific cost estimates prepared by the applicant team. These estimates address ongoing maintenance of the following Project infrastructure: Madison Street improvements, Jefferson Street improvements, Avenue 62 improvements, flood protection infrastructure, and Guadalupe Dike. Per direction from City staff, the FIA assumes that the cost of maintaining these improvements would be partially funded by the City's existing Park Maintenance and Landscape & Lighting Assessment District; the portion of costs not covered by the Project's assessment payments to the District would be absorbed by the City's General Fund. • Projected transient occupancy tax (TOT) from the proposed resort (villas) and short-term rentals (STR's) within the Project area have been projected based on a methodology approved by City staff (and consistent with historic trends for comparable resort properties in La Quinta). • Projected assessed values in the Project area reflect the applicant's current home pricing forecasts (based on a February 2023 market evaluation supplied by Market Watch, LLC). • Property tax calculations reflect the fact that the portion of the proposed Project north of Avenue 62 is within a former County of Riverside redevelopment area. Due to the County's remaining debt obligations associated with the former redevelopment area, the City of La Quinta will not receive the full share of property tax revenue for development north of Avenue P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885 Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597 1020 Memorandum to Hofmann Land Development Company July 27, 2023 Page 2 62 until 2041 (when the redevelopment debt is fully retired). The FIA estimates property tax income for earlier years based on a formula supplied by City staff. Summary Conclusions Annually Recuring Impacts. At buildout, the proposed Project would generate City General Fund revenue of nearly $6.0 million per year. General Fund costs are projected at approximately $4.0 million per year. Thus, the Project would have a net positive impact of approximately $2.0 million per year on the City's General Fund. Table 1 on the next page provides a detailed break -down of the projected revenues and costs by General Fund line item. The table also shows the fiscal impacts attributable to the portion of the Project north of Avenue 62 and the portion of the Project south of Avenue 62. Based on the applicant's current phasing plans for the project, the FIA assumes that the Project would be absorbed and occupied over a 7-year period, with Phase 1A absorbed in Years 1-2, Phase 1B absorbed in Years 3-4, Phase 2 absorbed in Year 5, and Phase 3 absorbed in Years 6-7. Appendix A provides year -by -year projections of the Project's fiscal impacts during the 7-year absorption period (Table A-1a provides the projections for the North portion of the project; Table A -lb provides the projections for the South portion of the project; and Table A-1c provides combined projections for the overall Project area). P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885 Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597 1021 Memorandum to Hofmann Land Development Company July 27, 2023 Page 3 Table 1 Summary of Annual Impacts to General Fund at Buildout Travertine Project, City of La Quinta North of South of Overall General Fund Avenue 62 Avenue 62 Project Revenues Property Tax' $787,715 $378,984 $1,166,698 Property Tax in lieu of VLF 203,117 97,723 300,840 Real Property Documentary Transfer Tax 25,733 13,125 38,858 State Sales Tax (on -site) 46,635 50,000 96,635 State Sales Tax (off -site) 187,727 95,750 283,478 Measure G Sales Tax (on -site) 46,635 50,000 96,635 Measure G Sales Tax (off -site) 187,727 95,750 283,478 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - Resort 980,162 0 980,162 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - STRs 1,410,908 751,718 2,162,625 STR Registration Fee 258,000 137,000 395,000 Utility Franchise Fees 99,273 39,928 139,201 Business Registration Fees 3,425 1,869 5,294 Licenses and Permits 261 104 365 Fines and Forfeitures 20,667 8,312 28,979 Total Revenues $4,257,985 $1,720,263 $5,978,248 Expenditures Police Department $825,413 $331,983 $1,157,397 Fire Department 520,178 209,217 729,395 Code Compliance / Animal Control 76,106 30,610 106,716 Parks, Recreation, and Community Services 328,002 130,208 458,209 Public Works (except parks - included above) 206,213 82,939 289,152 Project -specific Infrastructure Maintenance 354,769 171,863 526,632 Design & Development 130,169 52,354 182,524 General Government 407,622 168,532 576,154 Total Expenditures $2,848,472 $1,177,707 $4,026,179 Net General Fund Fiscal Impact $1,409,513 $542,556 $1,952,069 Source: TNDG. P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885 Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597 1022 Memorandum to Hofmann Land Development Company July 27, 2023 Page 4 One-time Development Impact Fee Revenue. In addition to generating a recurring fiscal benefit to the City's General Fund, the proposed Project would contribute towards the funding of future infrastructure and public facility improvements in La Quinta. Based on the City's current fee schedule, the proposed Project would pay a total of approximately $11.6 million in City of La Quinta development impact fees. Table 2 below shows the breakdown of this total by facility category. The detailed calculations are shown in Appendix A, Table A-2d. Table 2 Projected Development Impact Fee (DIF) Contribution Travertine Project, City of La Quinta DIF Category Project Total Park Improvements Community/Cultural Library Civic Center Maintenance Facilities Fire Transportation Total Source: TNDG $2,476,344 1,124,054 466,783 1,553,870 391,331 465,087 5,122,481 $11,599,949 P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885 Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597 1023 Memorandum to Hofmann Land Development Company July 27, 2023 Page 5 Overview of Methodology and Key Assumptions The methodology for the FIA calculations is detailed in Attachment A. Land Use Assumptions. The assumed land use breakdown for the proposed Project at full buildout is provided on Table A-2a. Table A-18 shows the assumed year -by -year absorption by land use. Revenue Projections. The methodologies for projecting General Fund revenues are summarized below and detailed on the attached tables. Property Tax, Property Tax in Lieu of VLF, and Property Transfer Tax • Projected home prices for the proposed Project are based on a market forecasts prepared by Market Watch, LLC (dated February 25, 2023). These projections are detailed by plan area and product type on Table A-2b and Table A-2c. For the non-residential components of the project, TNDG has assumed the following assessed values for the proposed Project: o Commercial (retail/restaurant) space - $300/square foot o Golf facility - $10 million (excluding retail/restaurant/banquet facilities which are calculated separately based on the per -square foot factor above) o Resort hotel - $500,000 per villa As noted above, a portion of the Project (the area north of Avenue 62) is within a former County of Riverside redevelopment area ("Thermal Community Sub -Area"). The County's debt obligations for the former redevelopment area will remain in place until 2041 (with portions of the outstanding bonds being retired in 2037 and 2040). As such, the City of La Quinta will not initially derive a full measure of property tax revenue from the portion of the project that is within this area. For the portion of the project not affected by the redevelopment issue (i.e., the area south of Avenue 62), the City of La Quinta General Fund will receive a 6.8% share of the total 1.0% property tax; in addition, the City will receive the Fire Fund's 5.7% share of the 1.0% property tax (these percentages were supplied by City staff). The analysis assumes that the same property tax shares would accrue to the City for the portion of north of Avenue 62, beginning in 2041 (when the County's debt obligations are fully retired). In the years leading up to 2041, the City's would receive only a portion of its ultimate shares of property tax generated by assessed valuation north of Avenue 61. The FIA estimates property tax income for these earlier years based on a formula supplied by City staff. • The assessed valuation and related Property Tax calculations are shown on Tables A-4 and A-5. • The methodology for calculating Property Tax in Lieu of VLF is shown on Table A-6. P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885 Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597 1024 Memorandum to Hofmann Land Development Company July 27, 2023 Page 6 • The calculations for Real Property Documentary Transfer Tax are shown on Table A-7. The Transfer Tax projections reflect an assumed residential turnover rate of 8.1% per year, based on the latest available Census data (see Table A-17). Sales Tax • The FIA includes sales tax projections related to the on -site retail/restaurant space (see Table A- 8), and also considers off -site taxable purchases that Project residents would make within the City of La Quinta (Table A-9). The sales tax projections include the City's standard share of the State Sales Tax (1% of taxable sales) and the additional revenue associated with the City's voter - approved Measure G sales tax. • The FIA assumes the following taxable sales factors for the various retail and restaurant components: o Hotel restaurant/bar/spa - $275/square foot (annually) o Golf restaurant/banquet facility - $450/square foot o Other retail space - $500/square foot Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) — Hotel (Villas) • The TOT calculations related to the resort are provided on Table A-10a. • The FIA assumes the following room and occupancy rates for the proposed Villas: o Room rate (peak season) - $650 o Room rate (off season) - $350 o Occupancy rate (peak season) — 61% o Occupancy rate (off season) — 32% • The analysis assumes that the peak -season and off-season periods would each be six months of the year. Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) and Registration Fees —Short-term Rentals (STR's) • In addition to TOT revenue derived from the resort Villas, individual residential units operated as short-term rentals (STR's) are also projected to generate TOT revenue for the City. Based on City of La Quinta policy, there would be no restrictions on the number of dwelling units within the project that would be permitted to be operated as STR's. However, current market trends (based on the City's experience) suggest that approximately 30% of residential property owners opt to make their units available as STR's. The FIA assumes that 50 units proximate the project's golf facility would be STR's. For the balance of the project, the FIA assumes that 30% of units would be STR's. TOT calculations for these units are detailed on Table A-10b. • The FIA assumes the following rental and occupancy rates for STR's: o Rental rate (peak season) - $600 P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885 Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597 1025 Memorandum to Hofmann Land Development Company July 27, 2023 Page 7 o Rental rate (off season) - $400 o Occupancy rate (peak season) — 30% o Occupancy rate (off season) — 30% • STR's also generate City General Fund revenue in the form of STR registration fees. Based on data in the City's current budget, revenue from STR registration fees is equivalent to 18.0% of STR-related TOT revenue. Thus, the FIA projects that for every $100 in STR-derived TOT revenue, the Project will generate an additional $18 in STR registration fee revenue. Miscellaneous General Fund Revenue • The FIA also includes the following General Fund revenues: o Utility Franchise Fees o Business Registration Fees o Licenses and Permits o Fines and Forfeitures • These miscellaneous revenues are projected on a per capita basis, using factors that consider the Project's resident population and its "daytime" employee population. The derivation of these per-person/per-employee factors is shown on Table A-12. For purposes of the per capita calculations, the FIA weights employees at 50% of full-time residents (i.e., one resident is assumed to be equivalent to 0.5 employees). Cost Projections. The FIA includes the following General Fund cost categories: • Police Department • Fire Department • Code Enforcement • Parks, Recreation and Community Services • Public Buildings and Streets • Project -specific infrastructure maintenance • Design & Development • General Government (City Council, City Manager, Marketing/Community Relations, City Attorney, City Clerk, Fiscal Services, Human Resources and Community Resources Administration) With the exception of General Government (as explained further below), the City's costs are projected on a per capita basis, using factors that consider the Project's resident population and its "daytime" employee population. The derivation of these per-person/per-employee factors is shown on Table A-14. For purposes of the per capita calculations, the FIA weights employees at 50% of full-time residents (i.e., one resident is assumed to be equivalent to 0.5 employees). P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885 Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597 1026 Memorandum to Hofmann Land Development Company July 27, 2023 Page 8 As shown on Table A-14, the per capita cost factors are based on the City's net General Fund costs in each category (i.e., total costs minus relevant offsetting revenues). For purposes of deriving a per capita cost factor for fire protection, the current Citywide budget has been adjusted upward by $1.5 million to reflect the potential addition of a fourth fire station in La Quinta. According to City staff, a new station would have a total operating cost of approximately $3 million per year, 50% of which is assumed to be added to the City's contract with Riverside County.' The 50% assumption reflects the expectation that a portion of the new station's service area would be in the unincorporated County area, with the County absorbing this portion of the cost. The City's Fire Department budget for FY 2022-23 is $8,851,872; for purposes of the FIA this budget has been increased to $10,351,872 ($8,851,872 plus $1,500,000). See Table A-14 for details. Table A-15c itemizes project -specific infrastructure maintenance costs, as supplied by the applicant team. As noted previously, the FIA assumes that these costs would be funded through the La Quinta Park Maintenance and Landscape & Lighting Assessment District and therefore would not impact the City's General Fund. The FIA treats the General Government line items as an overhead cost category. As shown on Table A- 16, the combined General Government costs currently represent 18.8% of other General Fund expenditures. This percentage is applied to the increase in other General Fund costs to project future increases in General Government expenditures. ' The portions of the operational costs to be absorbed by the City and the County are still being discussed. Should the City and County ultimately determine a cost -sharing formula other than the 50/50 split assumed in this report, the FIA will be amended. P.O. Box 489, Yorba Linda, California 92885 Phone: (714) 692-9596 . Fax: (714) 692-9597 1027 Attachment A: FIA Calculations for Proposed Project 1028 Table A-1 Summary of Annual Impacts to General Fund at Buildout Travertine Project, City of La Quinta General Fund Ravanuas Property Tax' Property Tax in lieu of VLF Real Property Documentary Transfer Tax State Sales Tax (on -site) State Sales Tax (off -site) Measure G Sales Tax (on -site) Measure G Sales Tax (off -site) Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - Resort Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - STRs STR Registration Fee Utility Franchise Fees Business Registration Fees Licenses and Permits Fines and Forfeitures Total Revenues Expenditures Police Department Fire Department Code Compliance / Animal Control Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Public Works (except parks - included above) Project -Specific Infrastructure Maintenance Design & Development General Government Total Expenditures Net General Fund Fiscal Impact Source: TNDG. North of Avenue South of Avenue 62 $787,715 203,117 25,733 46,635 187,727 46,635 187,727 980,162 1,410,908 258,000 99,273 3,425 261 20,667 $4, 257, 985 $825,413 520,178 76,106 328,002 206,213 354,769 130,169 407,622 $2, 848, 472 $1,409,513 62 $378,984 97,723 13,125 50,000 95,750 50,000 95,750 751,718 137,000 39,928 1,869 104 8,312 $1, 720, 263 $331,983 209,217 30,610 130,208 82,939 171,863 52,354 168,532 $1,177, 707 $542,556 Overall Project $1,166,698 300,840 38,858 96,635 283,478 96,635 283,478 980,162 2,162,625 395,000 139,201 5,294 365 28,979 $5, 978, 248 $1,157,397 729,395 106,716 458,209 289,152 526,632 182,524 576,154 $4, 026,179 $1, 952, 069 Notes: 1. For portion of project north of Avenue 62, City would not receive full property tax share until 2041. (See Tables A--1A, A-113, and A-1C for year -by -year projections.) 1029 Table A-1A Summary of Annual Impacts to General Fund by Year Travertine Project - NORTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta General Fund Revenues Property Tax Property Tax in lieu of VLF Real Property Documentary Transfer Tax State Sales Tax (on -site) State Sales Tax (off -site) Measure G Sales Tax (on -site) Measure G Sales Tax (off -site) Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - Resort Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - STRs STR Registration Fee Utility Franchise Fees Business Registration Fees Licenses and Permits Fines and Forfeitures Total Revenues Expenditures Police Department Fire Department Code Compliance I Animal Control Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Public Works (except parks - included above) Project -Specific Infrastructure Maintenance Design & Development General Government Total Expenditures Net General Fund Fiscal Impact Source: TNDG. Phase 1A Phase 1B Phase 2 Phase 3 Buildout Buildout Buildout Buildout Yr-1 Yr-2 Yr-3 Yr-4 Yr-5 Yr-6 Yr-7 Yr-8 Yr-9 Yr-10 $0 $0 $74,204 $146,735 $300,619 $415,814 $483,592 $483,592 $684,470 $684,470 0 0 31,167 61,631 126,265 174,649 203,117 203,117 203,117 203,117 0 0 4,328 8,558 17,532 21,780 25,733 25,733 25,733 25,733 0 0 0 0 0 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 0 0 29,066 57,476 124,350 157,131 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 0 0 0 0 0 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 0 0 29,066 57,476 124,350 157,131 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 0 0 0 0 0 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 0 0 218,453 431,978 934,583 1,180,958 1,410,908 1,410,908 1,410,908 1,410,908 0 0 39,946 78,992 170,899 215,951 258,000 258,000 258,000 258,000 0 0 14,830 29,325 63,444 83,663 99,273 99,273 99,273 99,273 0 0 0 0 0 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,425 0 0 40 80 173 219 261 261 261 261 0 0 3,087 6,105 13,208 17,417 20,667 20,667 20,667 20,667 $0 $0 $444,187 $878, 355 $1, 875, 423 $3, 501, 571 $3, 953, 863 $3, 953, 863 $4,154, 741 $4,154, 741 $0 $0 $123,302 $243,823 $527,511 $695,621 $825,413 $825,413 $825,413 $825,413 0 0 77,705 153,658 332,439 438,383 520,178 520,178 520,178 520,178 0 0 11,369 22,481 48,638 64,139 76,106 76,106 76,106 76,106 0 0 50,785 100,424 217,268 274,544 328,002 328,002 328,002 328,002 0 0 30,805 60,914 131,788 173,787 206,213 206,213 206,213 206,213 0 0 0 0 0 0 354,769 354,769 354,769 354,769 0 0 19,445 38,451 83,190 109,701 130,169 130,169 130,169 130,169 0 0 52,340 103,499 223,919 293,281 407,622 407,622 407,622 407,622 0 0 365,751 723,251 1,564,753 2,049,455 2,848,472 2,848,472 2,848,472 2,848,472 $0 $0 $78,437 $155,104 $310,671 $1,452,116 $1,105,391 $1,105,391 $1,306,269 $1,306,269 1030 Table A-1A Summary of Annual Impacts to General Fund by Year Travertine Project - NORTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta General Fund Revenues Property Tax Property Tax in lieu of VLF Real Property Documentary Transfer Tax State Sales Tax (on -site) State Sales Tax (off -site) Measure G Sales Tax (on -site) Measure G Sales Tax (off -site) Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - Resort Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - STRs STR Registration Fee Utility Franchise Fees Business Registration Fees Licenses and Permits Fines and Forfeitures Total Revenues Expenditures Police Department Fire Department Code Compliance I Animal Control Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Public Works (except parks - included above) Project -Specific Infrastructure Maintenance Design & Development General Government Total Expenditures Net General Fund Fiscal Impact Source: TNDG. Yr-11 Yr-12 Yr-13 Yr-14 Yr-15 Yr-16 Yr-17 Yr-18 Yr-19 Yr-20 $684,470 $782,850 $787,715 $787,715 $787,715 $787,715 $787,715 $787,715 $787,715 $787,715 203,117 203,117 203,117 203,117 203,117 203,117 203,117 203,117 203,117 203,117 25,733 25,733 25,733 25,733 25,733 25,733 25,733 25,733 25,733 25,733 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 46,635 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 187,727 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 1,410,908 1,410,908 1,410,908 1,410,908 1,410,908 1,410,908 1,410,908 1,410,908 1,410,908 1,410,908 258,000 258,000 258,000 258,000 258,000 258,000 258,000 258,000 258,000 258,000 99,273 99,273 99,273 99,273 99,273 99,273 99,273 99,273 99,273 99,273 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,425 3,425 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 261 $825,413 $825,413 $825,413 $825,413 $825,413 $825,413 $825,413 $825,413 $825,413 $825,413 520,178 520,178 520,178 520,178 520,178 520,178 520,178 520,178 520,178 520,178 76,106 76,106 76,106 76,106 76,106 76,106 76,106 76,106 76,106 76,106 328,002 328,002 328,002 328,002 328,002 328,002 328,002 328,002 328,002 328,002 206,213 206,213 206,213 206,213 206,213 206,213 206,213 206,213 206,213 206,213 354,769 354,769 354,769 354,769 354,769 354,769 354,769 354,769 354,769 354,769 130,169 130,169 130,169 130,169 130,169 130,169 130,169 130,169 130,169 130,169 $1,306,269 $1,404,649 $1,409,513 $1,409,513 $1,409,513 $1,409,513 $1,409,513 $1,409,513 $1,409,513 $1,409,513 1031 Table A-1 B Summary of Annual Impacts to General Fund by Year Travertine Project - SOUTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta General Fund Revenues Property Tax Property Tax in lieu of VLF Real Property Documentary Transfer Tax State Sales Tax (on -site) State Sales Tax (off -site) Measure G Sales Tax (on -site) Measure G Sales Tax (off -site) Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - Resort Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - STRs STIR Registration Fee Utility Franchise Fees Business Registration Fees Licenses and Permits Fines and Forfeitures Total Revenues Expenditures Police Department Fire Department Code Compliance / Animal Control Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Public Works (except parks - included above) Project -Specific Infrastructure Maintenance Design & Development General Government Total Expenditures Net General Fund Fiscal Impact Source: TNDG. Phase 1A Phase 1B Phase 2 Phase 3 Buildout Buildout Buildout Buildout Yr-1 Yr-2 Yr-3 Yr-4 Yr-5 Yr-6 Yr-7 Yr-8 Yr-9 Yr-10 $192,892 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 49,738 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 6,389 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 46,612 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 46,612 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 365,939 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 66,692 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 20,415 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 50 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 $901,458 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $169,744 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 106,973 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 15,651 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 63,386 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 42,407 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 0 0 0 0 0 0 171,863 171,863 171,863 171,863 26,769 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 70,963 139,831 139,831 139,831 139,831 139,831 168,532 168,532 168,532 168,532 495,892 977,143 977,143 977,143 977,143 977,143 1,177,707 1,177, 707 1,177,707 1,177, 707 $405,566 $743,120 $743,120 $743,120 $743,120 $743,120 $542,556 $542,556 $542,556 $542,556 1032 Table A-1 B Summary of Annual Impacts to General Fund by Year Travertine Project - SOUTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta General Fund Revenues Property Tax Property Tax in lieu of VLF Real Property Documentary Transfer Tax State Sales Tax (on -site) State Sales Tax (off -site) Measure G Sales Tax (on -site) Measure G Sales Tax (off -site) Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - Resort Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - STRs STR Registration Fee Utility Franchise Fees Business Registration Fees Licenses and Permits Fines and Forfeitures Total Revenues Expenditures Police Department Fire Department Code Compliance I Animal Control Parks, Recreation, and Community Services Public Works (except parks - included above) Project -Specific Infrastructure Maintenance Design & Development General Government Total Expenditures Net General Fund Fiscal Impact Source: TNDG. Yr-11 Yr-12 Yr-13 Yr-14 Yr-15 Yr-16 Yr-17 Yr-18 Yr-19 Yr-20 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 $378,984 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 97,723 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 13,125 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 95,750 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 751,718 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 137,000 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 39,928 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 104 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $1,720,263 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 $331,983 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 209,217 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 30,610 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 130,208 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 82,939 171,863 171,863 171,863 171,863 171,863 171,863 171,863 171,863 171,863 171,863 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 52,354 168,532 168,532 168,532 168,532 168,532 168,532 168,532 168,532 168,532 168,532 1,177,707 1,177,707 1,177,707 1,177,707 1,177,707 1,177,707 1,177,707 1,177,707 1,177,707 1,177,707 $542,556 $542,556 $542,556 $542,556 $542,556 $542,556 $542,556 $542,556 $542,556 $542,556 1033 Table A-1 C Summary of Annual Impacts to General Fund by Year Travertine Project - OVERALL PROJECT City of La Quinta Phase 1A Phase 1B Phase 2 Phase 3 Buildout Buildout Buildout Buildout General Fund Yr-1 Yr-2 Yr-3 Yr-4 Yr-5 Yr-6 Yr-7 Yr-8 Yr-9 Yr-10 Revenues Property Tax $192,892 $378,984 $453,188 $525,719 $679,603 $794,798 $862,576 $862,576 $1,063,454 $1,063,454 Property Tax in lieu of VLF 49,738 97,723 128,890 159,354 223,988 272,372 300,840 300,840 300,840 300,840 Real Property Documentary Transfer Tax 6,389 13,125 17,453 21,683 30,657 34,905 38,858 38,858 38,858 38,858 State Sales Tax (on -site) 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 State Sales Tax (off -site) 46,612 95,750 124,816 153,227 220,101 252,882 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 Measure G Sales Tax (on -site) 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 Measure G Sales Tax (off -site) 46,612 95,750 124,816 153,227 220,101 252,882 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - Resort 0 0 0 0 0 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - STRs 365,939 751,718 970,170 1,183,695 1,686,300 1,932,675 2,162,625 2,162,625 2,162,625 2,162,625 STIR Registration Fee 66,692 137,000 176,946 215,992 307,899 352,951 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 Utility Franchise Fees 20,415 39,928 54,757 69,253 103,372 123,591 139,201 139,201 139,201 139,201 Business Registration Fees 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 1,869 5,294 5,294 5,294 5,294 5,294 Licenses and Permits 50 104 144 184 277 322 365 365 365 365 Fines and Forfeitures 4,250 8,312 11,400 14,417 21,520 25,730 28,979 28,979 28,979 28,979 Total Revenues $901,458 $1,720,263 $2,164,451 $2,598,619 $3,595,687 $5,221,834 $5,674,126 $5,674,126 $5,875,004 $5,875,004 Expenditures Police Department $169,744 $331,983 $455,286 $575,807 $859,495 $1,027,605 $1,157,397 $1,157,397 $1,157,397 $1,157,397 Fire Department 106,973 209,217 286,922 362,875 541,656 647,599 729,395 729,395 729,395 729,395 Code Compliance / Animal Control 15,651 30,610 41,979 53,091 79,248 94,749 106,716 106,716 106,716 106,716 Parks, Recreation, and Community Services 63,386 130,208 180,993 230,632 347,475 404,752 458,209 458,209 458,209 458,209 Public Works (except parks - included above) 42,407 82,939 113,744 143,854 214,727 256,726 289,152 289,152 289,152 289,152 Project -Specific Infrastructure Maintenance 0 0 0 0 0 0 526,632 526,632 526,632 526,632 Design & Development 26,769 52,354 71,800 90,806 135,544 162,055 182,524 182,524 182,524 182,524 General Government 70,963 139,831 192,171 243,330 363,750 433,112 576,154 576,154 576,154 576,154 Total Expenditures 495,892 977,143 1,342,894 1,700,394 2,541,896 3,026,598 4,026,179 4,026,179 4,026,179 4,026,179 Net General Fund Fiscal Impact $405,566 $743,120 $821,557 $898,224 $1,053,791 $2,195,236 $1,647,947 $1,647,947 $1,848,825 $1,848,825 Source: TNDG. 1034 Table A-1 C Summary of Annual Impacts to General Fund by Year Travertine Project - OVERALL PROJECT City of La Quinta General Fund Yr-11 Yr-12 Yr-13 Yr-14 Yr-15 Yr-16 Yr-17 Yr-18 Yr-19 Yr-20 Revenues Property Tax $1,063,454 $1,161,834 $1,166,698 $1,166,698 $1,166,698 $1,166,698 $1,166,698 $1,166,698 $1,166,698 $1,166,698 Property Tax in lieu of VLF 300,840 300,840 300,840 300,840 300,840 300,840 300,840 300,840 300,840 300,840 Real Property Documentary Transfer Tax 38,858 38,858 38,858 38,858 38,858 38,858 38,858 38,858 38,858 38,858 State Sales Tax (on -site) 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 State Sales Tax (off -site) 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 Measure G Sales Tax (on -site) 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 96,635 Measure G Sales Tax (off -site) 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 283,478 Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) - Resort 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 980,162 Transient OccupancyTax(TOT) -STRs 2,162,625 2,162,625 2,162,625 2,162,625 2,162,625 2,162,625 2,162,625 2,162,625 2,162,625 2,162,625 STIR Registration Fee 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 395,000 Utility Franchise Fees 139,201 139,201 139,201 139,201 139,201 139,201 139,201 139,201 139,201 139,201 Business Registration Fees 5,294 5,294 5,294 5,294 5,294 5,294 5,294 5,294 5,294 5,294 Licenses and Permits 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 365 Fines and Forfeitures 28,979 28,979 28,979 28,979 28,979 28,979 28,979 28,979 28,979 28,979 Total Revenues $5,875,004 $5,973,384 $5,978,248 $5,978,248 $5,978,248 $5,978,248 $5,978,248 $5,978,248 $5,978,248 $5,978,248 Expenditures Police Department $1,157,397 $1,157,397 $1,157,397 $1,157,397 $1,157,397 $1,157,397 $1,157,397 $1,157,397 $1,157,397 $1,157,397 Fire Department 729,395 729,395 729,395 729,395 729,395 729,395 729,395 729,395 729,395 729,395 Code Compliance / Animal Control 106,716 106,716 106,716 106,716 106,716 106,716 106,716 106,716 106,716 106,716 Parks, Recreation, and Community Services 458,209 458,209 458,209 458,209 458,209 458,209 458,209 458,209 458,209 458,209 Public Works (except parks - included above) 289,152 289,152 289,152 289,152 289,152 289,152 289,152 289,152 289,152 289,152 Project -Specific Infrastructure Maintenance 526,632 526,632 526,632 526,632 526,632 526,632 526,632 526,632 526,632 526,632 Design & Development 182,524 182,524 182,524 182,524 182,524 182,524 182,524 182,524 182,524 182,524 General Government 576,154 576,154 576,154 576,154 576,154 576,154 576,154 576,154 576,154 576,154 Total Expenditures 4,026,179 4,026,179 4,026,179 4,026,179 4,026,179 4,026,179 4,026,179 4,026,179 4,026,179 4,026,179 Net General Fund Fiscal Impact $1,848,825 $1,947,205 $1,952,069 $1,952,069 $1,952,069 $1,952,069 $1,952,069 $1,952,069 $1,952,069 $1,952,069 Source: TNDG. 1035 Table A-2a Land Use Assumptions for Fiscal Impact Analysis Travertine Project City of La Quinta Residential Units MDR (units) LDR (units) Total Residential Units Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) Restaurant Space (square feet) Commercial Total Square Feet Resort Villa Units Total Resort Units Golf Golf Facility (acres) Total Golf Facility (acres) Population Summary Residents Employees Equivalent Residents - Employees Total Equivalent Residents Source: The Natelson Dale Group, Inc. North of South of Avenue 62 Avenue 62 Overall Project 368 - 368 491 341 832 859 341 1,200 500 1,000 1,500 17,654 10,000 27,654 18,154 11,000 29,154 100 - 100 100 - 100 - 46 46 - 46 46 2,010 798 2,808 147 80 227 73 40 113 2,083 838 2,921 1036 Table A-2b Estimated Home Sale Prices Travertine Project - NORTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Total Product Estimated Estimated Planning Area Units Type Base Price Total Price' PA-2 205 MDR $500,000 $595,125 PA-3 85 LDR $625,000 $743,906 PA-4 27 LDR $550,000 $654,638 PA-5 31 LDR $550,000 $654,638 PA-6 163 MDR $500,000 $595,125 PA-7 61 LDR $550,000 $654,638 PA-8 73 LDR $550,000 $654,638 PA-9 74 LDR $550,000 $654,638 PA-15* 24 LDR $655,000 $779,614 PA- 16A 78 LDR $800,000 $952,200 PA-16B 38 LDR $625,000 $743,906 Total 859 *PA 15 is split north and south of Avenue 62. Source: The Natelson Dale Group, Inc., based on Travertine Project Pricing Update, prepared by Market Watch, LLC and dated February 25, 2023. Notes: 1. Includes lot premiums (average 3.5%) and options (average 15%) applied to base prices. 1037 Table A-2c Estimated Home Sale Prices Travertine Project - SOUTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Total Product Estimated Estimated Planning Area Units Type Base Price Total Price' PA-10 75 LDR $550,000 $654,638 PA-12A 32 LDR $655,000 $779,614 PA-12B 15 LDR $900,000 $1,071,225 PA-12C 60 LDR $800,000 $952,200 PA- 13A 38 LDR $900,000 $1,071,225 PA-13B 10 LDR $800,000 $952,200 PA-14A 12 LDR $800,000 $952,200 PA-14B 53 LDR $655,000 $779,614 PA- 15A* 41 LDR $800,000 $952,200 PA-1513* 5 LDR $900,000 $1,071,225 Total 341 *PA 15 is split north and south of Avenue 62. Source: The Natelson Dale Group, Inc., based on Travertine Project Pricing Update, prepared by Market Watch, LLC and dated February 25, 2023. Notes: 1. Includes lot premiums (average 3.5%) and options (average 15%) applied to base prices. 1038 Table A-2d Calculation of Development Impact Fee (DIF) Contribution Travertine Project City of La Quinta City's DIF Schedule: SFD SFA DIF Category Units Units Park Improvements $2,106 $1,794 Community/Cultural $956 $814 Library $397 $338 Civic Center $1,230 $1,115 Maintenance Facilities $313 $247 Fire $369 $335 Transportation $4,009 $3,076 Total $9,380 $7,719 Project Units: 1,037 163 Project DIF Contribution by Category: DIF Category SFD SFA Park Improvements $2,183,922 $292,422 Community/Cultural $991,372 $132,682 Library $411,689 $55,094 Civic Center $1,275,510 $181,745 Maintenance Facilities $324,581 $40,261 Fire $382,653 $54,605 Transportation $4,157,333 $501,388 Total $9,727,060 $1,258,197 Commercial Lodging Golf Course (1,000 SF) Rooms Acres N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A $522 $698 $251 $461 $106 $53 $151 $201 $72 $8,057 $1,859 $930 $9,191 $2,864 $1,306 29.2 100 46.2 Commercial Lodging Golf Course Total N/A N/A N/A $2,476,344 N/A N/A N/A $1,124,054 N/A N/A N/A $466,783 $15,218 $69,800 $11,596 $1,553,870 $13,440 $10,600 $2,449 $391,331 $4,402 $20,100 $3,326 $465,087 Source: The Natelson Dale Group, Inc., based on City of La Quinta Development Impact Fee Summary (dated July 1, 2021). 1039 Table A-3a Project Description and Fiscal Model Input Factors Travertine Project - NORTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Taxable Sales Estimated Total Assessed per SF / Residents per Unit' Residents or Assessed Development Category Units or SF Value/Unit or SF RevPAR or SF per Employee Employees Value Residential MDR (units) 368 $595,125 N/A 2.34 861 $219,006,000 LDR (units) 491 730,380 N/A 2.34 1,149 358,616,374 Residential Total 859 $672,436 2.34 2,010 $577,622,374 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) 500 $300 $500 200 3 $150,000 Restaurant Space (SF) 17,654 300 250 400 44 5,296,200 Total Commercial 18,154 $300 $257 389 47 $5,446,200 Resort Villa Units 100 $500,000 $233 1.0 100 $50,000,000 Total Resort Units 100 $500,000 $233 1.0 100 $50,000,000 Golf Golf Facility (acres) - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Golf Facility (acres) - N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Source: TNDG. Notes: 1. California Department of Finance Persons per Household Estimate for City of La Quinta. 1040 Table A-3b Project Description and Fiscal Model Input Factors Travertine Project - SOUTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Estimated Total Assessed Taxable Sales Residents per Unit' Residents or Development Category Units or SF Value/Unit or SF per SF or SF per Employee Employees Residential MDR (units) - - N/A 2.34 - LDR (units) 341 $863,978 N/A 2.34 798 Residential Total 341 $863,978 N/A 2.34 798 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) 1,000 $300 $500 200 5 Restaurant Space (SF) 10,000 300 450 400 25 Total Commercial 11,000 $300 $455 367 30 Resort Villa Units - N/A N/A N/A N/A Total Resort Units - N/A N/A N/A N/A Golf Golf Facility (acres) 46.2 N/A N/A N/A 50 Total Golf Facility (acres) 46.2 N/A N/A N/A 50 Source: TNDG. Notes: 1. California Department of Finance Persons per Household Estimate for City of La Quinta. Assessed Value $294,616,631 $294,616,631 $300,000 3,000,000 $3,300,000 N/A N/A $10,000,000 $10,000,000 1041 Table A-4a Assessed Value Estimates by Project Component Travertine Project - NORTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Project Component Residential MDR (units) LDR (units) Total Residential Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) Restaurant Space (square feet) Total Commercial Resort Villa Units Total Resort Units Total Assessed Value Less Existing Value Net Impact on Assessed Value Units / SF 368 491 859 500 17,654 18,154 100 100 Assessed Value $219,006,000 358,616,374 $577,622,374 $150,000 5,296,200 $5,446,200 $50,000,000 $50,000,000 $633,068,574 2,392,415 $630,676,159 1042 Table A-4b Assessed Value Estimates by Project Component Travertine Project - SOUTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Project Component Residential MDR (units) LDR (units) Total Residential Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) Restaurant Space (square feet) Total Commercial Golf Golf Facility (acres) Total Golf Facility (acres) Total Assessed Value Less Existing Value Net Impact on Assessed Value Units / SF / Acres 341 341 500 17,654 18,154 46.2 46.2 Assessed Value $0 294,616,631 $294,616,631 $300,000 3,000,000 $3,300,000 $10,000,000 $10,000,000 $307,916,631 4,486,759 $303,429,872 1043 Table A-5 Total Property Tax Increment by Agency Travertine Project City of La Quinta North of South of Avenue 62 Avenue 62 Overall Project Total Increase in Assessed Value $630,676,159 $303,429,872 $934,106,031 Total Property Tax Increment @ 1.0% of Assessed Value $6,306,762 $3,034,299 $9,341,060 City of La Quinta General Fund Share 6.8% 6.8% Fire Fund Share 5.7% 5.7% Total City Property Tax Share' 12.5% 12.5% Annual General Fund Revenue $787,715 $378,984 $1,166,698 Source: TNDG. Notes: 1. For portion of project north of Avenue 62, City would not receive full property tax share until 2041. (See Tables A--1 A, A-1B, and A-1C for year -by -year projections.) 1044 Table A-6 Projected Property Tax In Lieu of Vehicle License Fees (VLF) Travertine Project City of La Quinta Citywide Property Tax In Lieu of VLF, FY 2023-24 $5,445,000 La Quinta Assessed Valuation (AV), FY 2022-23 (in $000's) $16,906,684 Variable Incremental Assessed Value from Project (in $000's)' Percentage Increase over FY 2022-23 Base New Property Tax In Lieu of VLF North of Avenue 62 $630,676 3.7% $203,117 South of Avenue 62 Overall Project $303,430 $934,106 1.8% 5.5% $97, 723 $300, 840 Source: City of La Quinta, FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget; Riverside County Assessor -County Clerk -Recorder press release dated July 12, 2022; TNDG. Notes: 1. See Tables A-4a and A-4b. 1045 Table A-7 Estimate of Real Property Documentary Transfer Tax Travertine Project City of La Quinta North of South of Avenue 62 Avenue 62 Total Residential Assessed Value $577,622,374 Annual Ownership Turnover Rate 8.1 % Annual Value of Properties Sold $46,787,412 City Documentary Transfer Tax Rate 0.055% Annual City Revenue $25,733 Source: TNDG $294,616,631 8.1 % $23,863,947 0.055% $13,125 Overall Project $872,239,005 8.1 % $70,651,359 0.055% $38, 858 1046 Table A-8 Estimate of On -Site Taxable Sales and City Sales Tax Revenue Travertine Project City of La Quinta Project Component Taxable Sales: Retail Restaurant Subtotal Taxable Sales On -Site Sales Tax @1 % of Taxable Sales Source: TNDG North of Avenue 62 South of Avenue 62 Overall Project $250,000 $500,000 $750,000 4,413,500 4,500,000 8,913,500 $4,663,500 $5,000,000 $9,663,500 $46,635 $50,000 $96,635 1047 Table A-9 Estimate of New City Off -Site Sales Tax Travertine Project City of La Quinta Proposed Project North of Avenue 62 Total Dwelling Units 859 Average Home Price $672,436 Household Income as Ratio of Home Price 25% Average Household Income $168,109 Aggregate Household Income $144,405,593 % Spent on Taxable Retail Sales 26% Total Taxable Retail Sales $37,545,454 % Captured in City 50% New Taxable Sales in City $18,772,727 City Sales Tax Revenue @1 % $187,727 South of Avenue 62 Total Dwelling Units 341 Average Home Price $863,978 Household Income as Ratio of Home Price 25% Average Household Income $215,995 Aggregate Household Income $73,654,158 % Spent on Taxable Retail Sales 26% Total Taxable Retail Sales $19,150,081 % Captured in City 50% New Taxable Sales in City $9,575,041 City Sales Tax Revenue @1 % $95,750 Total Projected Off -Site Taxable Sales: $28,347,768 Total Projected Off -Site Sales Tax Revenue: $283,478 Source: TNDG. 1048 Table A-10a Estimate of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Revenue from Villa (Hotel) Units Travertine Project City of La Quinta Months per season Average occupancy rate Villa units Occupied room nights (villas) Average room rate (villas) Resort fee (villas) Room revenue (villas) Resort fee revenue (villas) Total Revenue Subject to TOT City TOT Revenue @ 11% Source: TNDG Peak Season Off Season C.1 Annual Total/ Average 6 12 61 % 32% 47% 100 100 100 11,133 5,840 16,973 $650 $350 $500 $25 $25 $25 $7,236,125 $2,044,000 $8,486,250 $278,313 $146,000 $424,313 $7,514,438 $2,190,000 $8,910,563 $826,588 $240,900 $980,162 1049 Table A-10b Estimate of Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) Revenue from Short -Term Rentals (STRs) Travertine Project City of La Quinta North of Avenue 62 Total dwelling units Portion available as STRs Total units available as STRs Months per season STR average occupancy rate STR nights Average daily STR rental rate STR revenue City TOT Revenue @ 10% South of Avenue 62 Peak Season 859 30% 258 6 30% 14,109 $600 $8,465,445 $846, 545 Off Season 859 30% 258 6 30% 14,109 $400 $5,643,630 $564,363 Annual Total/ Average 859 30% 258 12 30% 28,218 $500 $14,109,075 $1,410,908 Total dwelling units 341 341 341 Golf area STRs 50 50 50 Remaining units 291 291 291 Portion of remaining units available as STRs 30% 30% 30% Total units available as STRs 137 137 137 Months per season STR average occupancy rate STR nights Average daily STR rental rate STR revenue City TOT Revenue @ 10% Source: TNDG 6 30% 7,517 $600 $4,510,305 $451, 031 6 30% 7,517 $400 $3,006,870 $300,687 12 30% 15,034 $500 $7,517,175 $751, 718 1050 Table A-10c Estimate of Registration Fee Revenue Short -Term Rentals (STRs) Travertine Project City of La Quinta Project Area North of Avenue 62 South of Avenue 62 Project Total Source: TNDG; City of La Quinta. Annual STR Units Registration (from Table 10b) Fee per STR Annual City Revenue 258 $1,000 $258,000 137 $1,000 $137,000 395 $395,000 1051 Table A-11 Estimate of New Employees Travertine Project City of La Quinta Retail/Restaurant Retail Restaurant Total Retail/Restaurant Resort Villa Units Total Resort Golf Golf Facility Total Golf Facility Total Onsite Employees Source: TNDG. North of Avenue 62 South of Avenue 62 Overall Project 3 5 8 44 25 69 47 30 77 100 0 100 100 0 100 0 50 50 0 50 50 147 80 227 1052 Table A-12 Derivation of Revenue Projection Factors Travertine Project City of La Quinta City of La Quinta Population 37,979 City of La Quinta, Dwelling Units 24,233 City of La Quinta, Employee Population 17,854 Employee Weighting Factor 0.50 Effective Employee Population 8,927 Budget Category Citywide GF Budget FY 2023/24 Allocation Relevant Basis' Population Per Capita Cost or Revenue Utility Franchise Fees $2,235,000 R+E 46,906 $47.65 Business Registration Fees 417,000 E 17,854 23.36 Other Licenses and Permits 5,000 R 37,979 0.13 Fines and Forfeitures 465,500 R+E 46,906 9.92 Sources: State of California, Department of Finance, E-5 Table for 2023; Southern California Association of Governments, 2022 Spatial and Statistical Profile for City of La Quinta; City of La Quinta, FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget; TNDG. Notes: 1. Allocation basis: R - residents; R+E - residents plus effective employee population. GF = General Fund. 1053 Table A-13a Projected General Fund Revenues Travertine Project - NORTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Business Utility Registration Licenses Fines and Variable Franchise Fees Fees and Permits Forfeitures Allocation Basis R+E E R R+E Residents 2,010 N/A 2,010 2,010 Onsite Employees 147 147 N/A 147 Weighting Factor 0.50 N/A N/A 0.50 Population Equivalent 2,083 147 2,010 2,083 Per Capita Revenue $47.65 $23.36 $.13 $9.92 Total Annual Revenue $99,273 $3,425 $261 $20,667 Source: TNDG. 1054 Table A-13b Projected General Fund Revenues Travertine Project - SOUTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Variable Allocation Basis Residents Onsite Employees Weighting Factor Population Equivalent Per Capita Revenue Total Annual Revenue Source: TNDG. Utility Franchise Fees R+E Business Registration Fees E Licenses Fines and and Permits Forfeitures IV R+E 798 N/A 798 798 80 80 N/A 80 0.50 N/A N/A 0.50 838 80 798 838 $47.65 $23.36 $.13 $9.92 $8,312 $39,928 $1,869 $104 1055 Table A-14 Derivation of Cost Projection Factors Travertine Project City of La Quinta City of La Quinta Population 37,979 City of La Quinta, Employee Population 17,854 Employee Weighting Factor 0.50 Effective Employee Population 8,927 Less: Net Citywide Offsetting GF General Fund Allocation Relevant Per Capita Budget Category GF Budget' Revenues Cost BasIS2 Population Costs Police Department $18,583,800 $18,583,800 R+E 46,906 $396.19 Fire Department3 11,711,420 11,711,420 R+E 46,906 249.68 Code Compliance/Animal Control 1,713,340 - 1,713,340 R+E 46,906 36.53 Parks, Recreation, and Community Services 6,560,970 363,700 6,197,270 R 37,979 163.18 Public Works (excluding parks) 4,963,900 321,000 4,642,900 R+E 46,906 98.98 Design & Development 4,259,400 1,328,500 2,930,900 R+E 46,906 62.48 Sources: State of California, Department of Finance, E-5 Table for 2023; Southern California Association of Governments, 2022 Spatial and Statistical Profile for City of La Quinta; City of La Quinta, FY 2023-24 Adopted Budget; TNDG. Notes: 1. Adopted budget line items for FY 2023-24. 2. Allocation basis: R+E - residents plus effective employee population. GF = General Fund. 3. Actual Fire Department budget for FY 2023-24 is $10,211,420; for purposes of this analysis, the existing budget has been adjusted upward by $1.5 million to reflect the potential addition of a fourth fire station in La Quinta (a new fire station would have a total operating cost of approximately $3 million per year, 50% of which is assumed to be added to the City's contract with Riverside County). 1056 Table A-15a Projected General Fund Costs Travertine Project - NORTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Variable Allocation Basis Residents Onsite Employees Weighting Factor Population Equivalent Per Capita Cost Total Annual Cost Source: TNDG. Parks, Code Recreation, Police Fire Compliance / and Community Public Design & Department Department Animal Control Services Works Development R+E R+E R+E R R+E R+E 2,010 2,010 2,010 2,010 2,010 2,010 147 147 147 N/A 147 147 0.50 0.50 0.50 N/A 0.50 0.50 2,083 2,083 2,083 2,010 2,083 2,083 $396.19 249.68 $36.53 $163.18 $98.98 $62.48 $328,002 $130,169 $825,413 $520,178 $76,106 $206,213 1057 Table A-15b Projected General Fund Costs Travertine Project - SOUTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Variable Allocation Basis Residents Onsite Employees Weighting Factor Population Equivalent Per Capita Cost Total Annual Cost Source: TNDG. Parks, Code Recreation, Police Fire Compliance / and Community Public Design & Department Department Animal Control Services Works Development R+E R+E R+E R R+E R+E 798 798 798 798 798 798 80 80 80 N/A 80 80 0.50 0.50 0.50 N/A 0.50 0.50 838 838 838 798 838 838 $396.19 249.68 $36.53 $163.18 $98.98 $62.48 $130,208 $52,354 $331,983 $209,217 $30,610 $82,939 1058 Table A-15c Projection of Project -Specific Infrastructure Maintenance Costs Travertine Project City of La Quinta Allocation by Subarea' Total Annual North of South of Infrastructure Item Cost Avenue 62 Avenue 62 Madison Street Onsite $10,381 $7,009 $3,372 Madison Street Offsite 98,640 66,598 32,042 Jefferson Onsite 57,152 38,587 18,565 Jefferson Offsite (City) 40,091 27,068 13,023 Jefferson Offsite (County) 123,604 83,453 40,151 Avenue 62 Offsite 139,011 93,855 45,156 Flood Protection 93,355 63,030 30,325 Guadalupe Dike 4,217 2,847 1,370 Total $566,451 $382,448 $184,003 Costs offset by Landscape & Lighting Assessment District2 $39,819 $27,679 $12,140 Net General Fund Cost $526,632 $354,769 $171,863 Source: TRG Land Inc.; TNDG; City of La Quinta. Notes: 1. Total costs allocated between north and south subareas based on shares of total assessed valuation. 2. Annual Assessments of $35.60 per SFD unit and $17.80 per SFA unit. 1059 Table A-16 Projected General Government Costs Travertine Project City of La Quinta General Government Categories City Council City Manager Marketing / Community Relations City Attorney City Clerk Central Services Human Resources Community Resources Admin. Total General Fund Total General Fund (non -Gen Gov't) General Government Functions @ Citywide GF Budget' $317,900 1,588,360 1,814,660 800,000 1,169,670 3,189,100 651,800 888,160 $10,419,650 $72,828,750 $62,409,100 16.7% of other General Fund costs 1. Study uses the adopted budgeted amounts for FY 2023-24. Source: City of La Quinta, FY 2022-23 Adopted & Capital Improvement Budget; TNDG. 1060 Table A-17 Estimate of Residential Turnover Rate City of La Quinta City of La Quinta Year Moved In Moved in 2017 or later Moved in 2015 to 2016 Moved in 2010 to 2014 Moved in 2000 to 2009 Moved in 1990 to 1999 Moved in 1989 or earlier Total Household Years/Occupied Unit3 Implied Turnover Rate Owner- % Occupied of Estimated Household units Total Years Years` 303 2.7% 0.5 152 1,126 10.1% 2.5 2,815 2,900 26.1% 5.5 15,950 4,747 42.7% 14.0 66,458 1,656 14.9% 24.0 39,744 393 3.5% 33.0 12,969 11,125 100.0% N/A 138,088 1. Estimated years in occupied unit. Assume move in date at midpoint of range. 2. Product of owner -occupied units and "estimated years". 3. Ratio of total "household years" to total owner -occupied units. 4. Reciprocal of the total household years/total owner -occupied units estimate. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey (2014-18); The Natelson Dale Group, Inc (TNDG). 12.41 8.1 % 1061 Table A-18 Project Phasing Assumptions Travertine Project City of La Quinta North of Avenue 62: Residential (units) PA-2 PA-3 PA-4 PA-5 PA-6 PA-7 PA-8 PA-9 PA-15* PA- 16A PA-16B Total Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) Restaurant Space (square feet) Total Resort Hotel Rooms Villa Units Total Golf Golf Facility (acres) I------- Phase 1A------- I I ------- Phase 1B------- I 1--Ph. 2--I 1-------- Phase 3-------- I Buildout Yr-1 Yr-2 Yr-3 Yr-4 Yr-5 Yr-6 Yr-7 Yr-8 Yr-9 Yr-10 205 0 0 0 0 0 105 100 0 0 0 85 0 0 0 0 0 45 40 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 27 0 0 0 0 0 31 0 0 16 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 0 0 0 0 163 0 0 0 0 0 61 0 0 31 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 73 0 0 37 36 0 0 0 0 0 0 74 0 0 37 37 0 0 0 0 0 0 24 0 0 12 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 78 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 859 0 0 133 130 306 150 140 0 0 0 500 500 17,654 17,654 18,154 0 0 0 0 0 18,154 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 1062 Table A-18 Project Phasing Assumptions Travertine Project City of La Quinta Buildout Yr-11 Yr-12 Yr-13 Yr-14 Yr-15 Yr-16 Yr-17 Yr-18 Yr-19 Yr-20 North of Avenue 62: Residential (units) PA-2 205 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-3 85 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-4 27 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-5 31 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-6 163 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-7 61 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-8 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-9 74 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-15* 24 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA- 16A 78 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-16B 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 859 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) 500 Restaurant Space (square feet) 17,654 Total 18,154 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Resort Hotel Rooms 0 Villa Units 100 Total 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Golf Golf Facility (acres) 0 1063 Table A-18 Project Phasing Assumptions Travertine Project City of La Quinta I------- Phase 1A------- I I ------- Phase 1B------- I 1--Ph. 2--I 1-------- Phase 3-------- I Buildout Yr-1 Yr-2 Yr-3 Yr-4 Yr-5 Yr-6 Yr-7 Yr-8 Yr-9 Yr-10 South of Avenue 62: Residential (units) PA-10 75 35 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA- 12A 32 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-12B 15 8 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-12C 60 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA- 13A 38 19 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-13B 10 5 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-14A 12 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-14B 53 24 29 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA- 15A' 41 20 21 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-15B' 5 3 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 341 166 175 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) 1,000 1,000 Restaurant Space (square feet) 10,000 10,000 Total 11,000 11,000 0 Resort Hotel Rooms 0 Villa Units 0 Total 0 0 0 Golf Golf Facility (acres) 46 46 Source: TNDG. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1064 Table A-18 Project Phasing Assumptions Travertine Project City of La Quinta Buildout Yr-11 Yr-12 Yr-13 Yr-14 Yr-15 Yr-16 Yr-17 Yr-18 Yr-19 Yr-20 South of Avenue 62: Residential (units) PA-10 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA- 12A 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-12B 15 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-12C 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA- 13A 38 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-13B 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-14A 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-14B 53 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA- 15A' 41 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PA-15B' 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 341 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) 1,000 Restaurant Space (square feet) 10,000 Total 11,000 Resort Hotel Rooms 0 Villa Units 0 Total 0 Golf Golf Facility (acres) 46 Source: TNDG. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 X 1065 Table A-19 Cumulative Development Travertine Project City of La Quinta Yr-1 Yr-2 Yr-3 Yr-4 Yr-5 Yr-6 Yr-7 Yr-8 Yr-9 Yr-10 North of Avenue 62: Residential PA-2 0 0 0 0 0 105 205 205 205 205 PA-3 0 0 0 0 0 45 85 85 85 85 PA-4 0 0 0 0 27 27 27 27 27 27 PA-5 0 0 16 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 PA-6 0 0 0 0 163 163 163 163 163 163 PA-7 0 0 31 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 PA-8 0 0 37 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 PA-9 0 0 37 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 PA-15* 0 0 12 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 PA- 16A 0 0 0 0 78 78 78 78 78 78 PA-16B 0 0 0 0 38 38 38 38 38 38 Total 0 0 133 263 569 719 859 859 859 859 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) 0 0 0 0 0 500 500 500 500 500 Restaurant Space (square feet) 0 0 0 0 0 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654 Total 0 0 0 0 0 18,154 18,154 18,154 18,154 18,154 Resort Hotel Rooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Villa Units 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 Total 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 Golf Golf Facility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1066 Table A-19 Cumulative Development Travertine Project City of La Quinta Yr-11 Yr-12 Yr-13 Yr-14 Yr-15 Yr-16 Yr-17 Yr-18 Yr-19 Yr-20 North of Avenue 62: Residential PA-2 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 205 PA-3 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 85 PA-4 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 27 PA-5 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 31 PA-6 163 163 163 163 163 163 163 163 163 163 PA-7 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 61 PA-8 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 PA-9 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 74 PA-15* 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 24 PA- 16A 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 78 PA-16B 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 Total 859 859 859 859 859 859 859 859 859 859 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 Restaurant Space (square feet) 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654 17,654 Total 18,154 18,154 18,154 18,154 18,154 18,154 18,154 18,154 18,154 18,154 Resort Hotel Rooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Villa Units 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Golf Golf Facility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1067 Table A-19 Cumulative Development Travertine Project City of La Quinta Yr-1 Yr-2 Yr-3 Yr-4 Yr-5 Yr-6 Yr-7 Yr-8 Yr-9 Yr-10 South of Avenue 62: Residential PA-10 35 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 PA- 12A 16 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 PA-12B 8 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 PA-12C 30 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 PA- 13A 19 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 PA-13B 5 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 PA-14A 6 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 PA-14B 24 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 PA- 15A' 20 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 PA-15B' 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Total 166 341 341 341 341 341 341 341 341 341 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Restaurant Space (square feet) 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 Resort Hotel Rooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Villa Units 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Golf Golf Facility 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 Source: TNDG, Table A-18 1068 Table A-19 Cumulative Development Travertine Project City of La Quinta Yr-11 Yr-12 Yr-13 Yr-14 Yr-15 Yr-16 Yr-17 Yr-18 Yr-19 Yr-20 South of Avenue 62: Residential PA-10 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 PA- 12A 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 32 PA-12B 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 PA-12C 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 60 PA- 13A 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 PA-13B 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 PA-14A 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 PA-14B 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 53 PA- 15A' 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 PA-15B' 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 Total 341 341 341 341 341 341 341 341 341 341 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space (square feet) 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Restaurant Space (square feet) 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Total 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 11,000 Resort Hotel Rooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Villa Units 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Golf Golf Facility 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 46 Source: TNDG, Table A-18 1069 Table A-20 Projected Residents/Employees Travertine Project City of La Quinta North of Avenue 62: Residential (residents) PA-2 PA-3 PA-4 PA-5 PA-6 PA-7 PA-8 PA-9 PA-15* PA- 16A PA-16B Total Retail/Restaurant (employees) Retail Space Restaurant Space Total Resort (employees) Hotel Rooms Villa Units Total Golf (employees) Golf Facility Total Employees Population Equivalent Yr-1 Yr-2 Yr-3 Yr-4 Yr-5 Yr-6 Yr-7 Yr-8 Yr-9 Yr-10 0 0 0 0 0 246 480 480 480 480 0 0 0 0 0 105 199 199 199 199 0 0 0 0 63 63 63 63 63 63 0 0 37 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 0 0 0 0 381 381 381 381 381 381 0 0 73 143 143 143 143 143 143 143 0 0 87 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 0 0 87 173 173 173 173 173 173 173 0 0 28 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 0 0 0 0 183 183 183 183 183 183 0 0 0 0 89 89 89 89 89 89 0 0 311 615 1,331 1,682 2,010 2,010 2,010 2,010 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 44 44 44 44 44 0 0 0 0 0 47 47 47 47 47 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 100 100 100 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 147 147 147 147 147 0 0 311 615 1,331 1,756 2,083 2,083 2,083 2,083 1070 Table A-20 Projected Residents/Employees Travertine Project City of La Quinta Yr-11 Yr-12 Yr-13 Yr-14 Yr-15 Yr-16 Yr-17 Yr-18 Yr-19 Yr-20 North of Avenue 62: Residential (residents) PA-2 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 480 PA-3 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 PA-4 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 PA-5 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 73 PA-6 381 381 381 381 381 381 381 381 381 381 PA-7 143 143 143 143 143 143 143 143 143 143 PA-8 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 171 PA-9 173 173 173 173 173 173 173 173 173 173 PA-15* 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 56 PA- 16A 183 183 183 183 183 183 183 183 183 183 PA-16B 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Total 2,010 2,010 2,010 2,010 2,010 2,010 2,010 2,010 2,010 2,010 Retail/Restaurant (employees) Retail Space 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Restaurant Space 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 44 Total 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 47 Resort (employees) Hotel Rooms 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Villa Units 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Golf (employees) Golf Facility 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Employees 147 147 147 147 147 147 147 147 147 147 Population Equivalent 2,083 2,083 2,083 2,083 2,083 2,083 2,083 2,083 2,083 2,083 1071 Table A-20 Projected Residents/Employees Travertine Project City of La Quinta South of Avenue 62: Residential (residents) PA-10 PA- 12A PA-12B PA-12C PA- 13A PA-13B PA-14A PA-14B PA- 15A* PA-15B* Total Retail/Restaurant (employees) Retail Space Restaurant Space Total Resort (employees) Hotel Rooms Villa Units Total Golf (employees) Golf Facility Total Employees Population Equivalent Source: TNDG, Tables A-3, A-11, and A-18 Yr-1 Yr-2 Yr-3 Yr-4 Yr-5 Yr-6 Yr-7 Yr-8 Yr-9 Yr-10 82 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 37 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 19 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 70 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 44 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 12 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 14 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 56 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 47 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 7 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 388 798 798 798 798 798 798 798 798 798 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 428 838 838 838 838 838 838 838 838 838 1072 Table A-20 Projected Residents/Employees Travertine Project City of La Quinta South of Avenue 62: Residential (residents) PA-10 PA- 12A PA-12B PA-12C PA- 13A PA-13B PA-14A PA-14B PA- 15A* PA-15B' Total Retail/Restaurant (employees) Retail Space Restaurant Space Total Resort (employees) Hotel Rooms Villa Units Total Golf (employees) Golf Facility Total Employees Population Equivalent Source: TNDG, Tables A-3, A-11, and A-1t Yr-11 Yr-12 Yr-13 Yr-14 Yr-15 Yr-16 Yr-17 Yr-18 Yr-19 Yr-20 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 176 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 35 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 140 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 23 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 28 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 124 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 96 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 798 798 798 798 798 798 798 798 798 798 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 50 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 838 838 838 838 838 838 838 838 838 838 1073 Table A-21a Assessed Value Estimates by Year (in thousands) Travertine Project - NORTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Project Component Buildout Yr-1 Yr-2 Yr-3 Yr-4 Yr-5 Yr-6 Yr-7 Yr-8 Yr-9 Yr-1a Residential MDR (units) $219,006 $0 $0 $0 $0 $97,005 $62,488 $59,513 $0 $0 LDR (units) 358,616 0 0 97,140 94,949 104,444 32,867 29,215 0 0 Total Residential $577,622 $0 $0 $97,140 $94,949 $201,450 $95,355 $88,728 $0 $0 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space $150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $150 $0 $0 $0 Restaurant Space 5,296 0 0 0 0 0 5,296 0 0 0 Total Commercial $5,446 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $5,446 $0 $0 $0 Resort Hotel Rooms $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Villa Units 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 50,000 0 0 0 Total Resort Units $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $50,000 $0 $0 $0 Total Assessed Value $633,069 $0 $0 $97,140 $94,949 $201,450 $150,801 $88,728 $0 $0 Less Existing Value 2,392 0 0 367 359 761 570 335 0 0 Net Impact on Assessed Value $630,676 $0 $0 $96,773 $94,591 $200,688 $150,232 $88,392 $0 $0 Source: TNDG, Tables A-3, A-4 and A-18 $0 0 en $0 0 $0 Qn $0 1074 Table A-21a Assessed Value Estimates by Year (in thousands) Travertine Project - NORTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Project Component Buildout Yr-11 Yr-12 Yr-13 Yr-14 Yr-15 Yr-16 Yr-17 Yr-18 Yr-19 Yr-2a Residential MDR (units) $219,006 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LDR (units) 358,616 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Residential $577,622 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space $150 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Restaurant Space 5,296 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Commercial $5,446 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Resort Hotel Rooms $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Villa Units 50,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Resort Units $50,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Assessed Value $633,069 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Less Existing Value 2,392 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net Impact on Assessed Value $630,676 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Source: TNDG, Tables A-3, A-4 and A-18 $0 0 $0 0 $0 Tn $0 1075 Table A-21 b Assessed Value Estimates by Year (in thousands) Travertine Project - NORTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Project Component Buildout Yr-1 Yr-2 Yr-3 Yr-4 Yr-5 Yr-6 Yr-7 Yr-8 Yr-9 Yr-1a Residential MDR (units) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LDR (units) 294,617 143,420 151,196 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Residential $294,617 $143,420 $151,196 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space $300 $300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Restaurant Space 3,000 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Commercial $3,300 $3,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Golf Course Skills Course $10,000 $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Assessed Value $307,917 $156,720 $151,196 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Less Existing Value 4,487 2,284 2,203 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net Impact on Assessed Value $303,430 $154,437 $148,993 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Source: TNDG, Tables A-3, A-4 and A-18 $0 0 en $0 Qn $0 1076 Table A-21 b Assessed Value Estimates by Year (in thousands) Travertine Project - NORTH OF AVENUE 62 City of La Quinta Project Component Buildout Yr-11 Yr-12 Yr-13 Yr-14 Yr-15 Yr-16 Yr-17 Yr-18 Yr-19 Yr-2a Residential MDR (units) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 LDR (units) 294,617 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Residential $294,617 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Retail/Restaurant Retail Space $300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Restaurant Space 3,000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Commercial $3,300 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Golf Course Skills Course $10,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total Assessed Value $307,917 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Less Existing Value 4,487 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net Impact on Assessed Value $303,430 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Source: TNDG, Tables A-3, A-4 and A-18 $0 0 $0 1077 ATTACHMENT 4 DRAFT TRAVERTINE PROJECT EXEMPTION FINDINGS FROM GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 66300 REQUIREMENTS The City of La Quinta City Council does hereby find and determine as follows: 1. Government Code Section 66300(e)(3)(D), formerly 66300(h)(1), provides that the requirements of Section 66300, et seq. that constrain the authority of the City of La Quinta ("City") to lower the residential dwelling unit density and intensity of use of real property through General Plan, zoning and other entitlement amendments do not supersede limit or otherwise modify the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. Res. Code § 21000, et seq.) ("CEQA"). 2. The requirements of CEQA apply to "discretionary projects proposed to be carried out or approved by public agencies, including, but not limited to, the enactment and amendment of zoning ordinances, the issuance of zoning variances, the issuance of conditional use permits and the approval of tentative subdivision maps ...." (Pub Res. Code § 21080.) 3. The environmental impact report certified by the La Quinta City Council on June 6, 1995 for the Travertine Specific Plan (State Clearing House No. 94112047) (1995 EIR") and the Travertine Specific Plan (1995 Specific Plan") approvals contemplated a maximum development of 2,300 residential dwelling units; however, the 1995 EIR and 1995 Specific Plan included many mitigation measures and conditions of approval that required additional environmental analyses before issuance of various federal, state and City permits and other approvals. The findings and conclusions of these additional environmental analyses have adversely impacted the amount of developable land and hence the number of residential dwelling units that can be developed within the 1995 Specific Plan area, as further discussed below. 4. Inasmuch as satisfaction of and compliance with the 1995 EIR mitigation measures and 1995 Specific Plan conditions of approval required extensive additional environmental analyses, the 1995 EIR is a de facto program environmental impact report that requires follow-on CEQA compliance in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c). 5. The 1995 EIR mitigation measures, 1995 Specific Plan conditions of approval, in addition to other applicable species and habitat conservation plans approved after 60133402.v1 1078 DRAFT certification of the 1995 EIR and approval of the 1995 Specific Plan requiring extensive further environmental analysis in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c) include, but are not limited to, the following: A. Hydrology and Drainage. 1995 EIR mitigation measure 3.7.2 requires the design and construction of storm water works including "Detention basins, and other storm water protective works [that] shall be constructed to protect structures from 100-year flooding." Such storm water works must meet the requirements of the Coachella Valley Water District ("CVWD") and the City's Public Works Department. 1. To comply with 1995 EIR mitigation measure 3.7.2, a Drainage Master Plan was prepared, in 20201 in accordance with CVWD, City Public Works Department and United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation (for potential flood impacts to Dike No. 4, which did not exist in 1995 and is under the jurisdiction of the United States Bureau of Reclamation) requirements, taking into consideration the potential dynamic hydraulic, sedimentation and erosion conditions present at the 1995 Specific Plan site. The 2020 Drainage Master Plan is included in the administrative record of proceedings for certification of the environmental impact report required to satisfy CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c), as discussed in Section 4 above (State Clearinghouse No. 2018011023) ("2021 EIR") for a General Plan amendment, specific plan amendment, tentative tract map and development agreement ("Revised Land Use Entitlements"). 2. The 2020 Drainage Master Plan identified project related impacts to the existing hydrologic and flood control features that affect the 1995 Specific Plan area and regional flood control and local drainage improvements required for development of the 1995 Specific Plan and to satisfy the 1995 EIR Mitigation Measures. 3. Implementation of the 1995 EIR Mitigation Measures, BO and other environmental requirements, as well as 2020 Drainage Master Plan will consume 394 acres of developable land as identified in 1995 Specific Plan area as depicted on Exhibit "A" hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, resulting in a reduction of 1012 residential units that can be developed. These acreage and unit reductions are detailed further below. B. Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. 1995 EIR mitigation measure 3.8.3 and Specific Plan condition of approval 15 require an assessment of impacts to the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep and habitat associated with development of the 1995 Specific Plan area. 1. In June, 2004, in order to comply with 1995 EIR mitigation measure 3.8.3 and 1995 Specific Plan condition of approval 15, the owner of the Travertine Specific Plan area submitted a request to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("USFWS") to initiate a 60133402.v1 1079 EXHIBIT A Current Boundar 1 Devil Canyon Development Footprint 508.2 AC .i f �t1 r r I i RPA with 200' Buffer 1 � 1 Middle North Canyon I1 " MiddleSouthSouth Canyon al L Na 1 `ak t Species Habitat/Critical Habitat Boundary (USFWS) 1 `6 r _ 1 Proposed Basins �I 1 1 i gtrpamhprl A Habitat - 1 Cultural Resources Restricted Open Space 1 NORTH 1—_--i This exhibit summarized the various elements that have shaped the current development footprint and supports the current entitlement effect of 1,200 DU. 1080 DRAFT Section 7 consultation process to assess the potential impacts to the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep and habitat resulting from development of the Specific Plan area. 2. The Section 7 consultation process resulted in approval of a Biological Opinion by the USFWS (FWS-ERIV-2735.3) ("BO") after consultation with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the Bureau of Reclamation on December 7, 2005. The BO is included in the administrative record of proceedings for approval of the Revised Land Use Entitlements. 3. The BO concluded that a proposed reduction in the 1995 Specific Plan area plus the addition of critical habitat required to mitigate against impacts to the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep as depicted on Exhibit "B" hereto and by this reference made a part hereof and explained above. C. Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan. In September and October, 2008, the state and federal governments, respectively, approved the Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan ("CVMSHCP") to address impacts to certain species and their habitat resulting from development. Compliance with the CVMSHCP substitutes, in part, for CEQA compliance for assessments of impacts to each individual species covered by the CVMSHCP and is mandatory. 1. Compliance with the CVMSHCP requires that no development will be permitted within the San Jacinto Mountains Conservation area. The CVMSHCP is included by reference in the administrative record of proceedings for approval of the Revised Land Use Entitlements. 2. The 1995 Specific Plan included area that encroaches into the San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area that must now be left undisturbed and preserved in perpetuity in compliance with the CVMSHCP. 3. Removing affected development areas of the 1995 Specific Plan area from the San Jacinto Mountains Conservation area as depicted on Exhibit "C" hereto and by this reference made a part hereof, resulted in a reduction of Specific Plan area as described above. D. Jurisdictional Waters and Desert Dry Wash Riparian Woodland Habitat. Desert Dry Wash Riparian Woodland Habitat. The south end of the Specific Plan area contains a concentration of desert dry wash riparian woodland habitat that present within a number of ephemeral drainage courses flowing from mountains to the west and south. 1. Preservation of a significant portion of the desert dry wash riparian woodland habitat is necessary in order to provide nesting sites for a number of species of birds and habitat for terrestrial animals. 60133402.v 1 1081 EXHIBIT B Figure 1. Proposed Travertine Project J��"7 Development and Conservation Boundaries "'- 4 - 4fJ Fk:Mi FVLLL1Fi EfRti'FCE .71Proposed deVelogfrFeilt auzsx.rks �44 7 - - UtC F4**m ls+rp Ras] '�i.• _ W " - ProposedoxLgervabon Gar,na].PAWLea9n" Proposed acquL.,i rl area for addrtional t ''' xT - _ 6a C+r�43.Y Prtr 3ortr��n �.tx►servabon of apprommat* 100 acres [! r,+acam: CecMfflbff x ='Z + t�- _ Peninsular bigham sheep k•ne ow Qw Mft• bU %.[L3 x . � cnucal ha,aAta: - - 0 5C0 1,00D Feet R� JIL • Y _ , - y Y - ti iT � N. •�. EXHIBIT C 1083 DRAFT 2. The 2021 EIR requires preservation of 55.98 acres of desert dry wash riparian woodland habitat as depicted on Exhibit "D" hereto and by this reference made a part hereof as a mitigation against loss of some of the habitat that will occur from development of the remainder of the Specific Plan area, resulting in a further reduction of 140 residential units that can be developed. 6. As a result of compliance with CEQA, the number of residential dwelling units that can be developed within the Specific Plan area has been reduced from 2,300 to 1,200. 60133402.v1 1084 EXHIBIT D 33.612921 -116.272715 F'S w l ( SEE INSET MAP , �LL P.8 P11 ----------- - - -- --------- 7 P14 _P12 P17 • P16 Regional Board Non -Wetland Waters & CDFW Jurisdictional Streambed (90.96 acres) CDFW Desert Dry Wash Woodland Habitat (55.98 acres) 1085 ATTACHMENT 5 ii . - MSA -..ONSU LTI NG, I N L a PLANlNJNG a CIVIL ENGINEERING a LAND SURVEYING June 13, 2024 Subject: Travertine Specific Plan Project Technical Memorandum This technical memorandum is provided to the City to address comments and questions raised at the May 28, 2024 public hearing of the La Quinta Planning Commission on the Travertine Specific Plan Project ("Project") Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR"). The City is currently preparing the Final EIR for the Project. The Final EIR will include responses to all comments received in the CEQA-mandated review and consultation process that raise significant environmental points. (CEQA Guidelines, § 15132.) I. Questions Relating to the Project Circulation and Phasing Plan. The Project will be developed in phases. The phasing of the Project is described in Section 3.7 of the DEIR. The DEIR fully analyzes the air quality emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, noise, and traffic generation impacts of the Project phasing plan. (DEIR, p. 3-39.) As described in Section 3.8 of the DEIR, at buildout the Project property is proposed to be served by two access points: (1) the southerly extension of Jefferson Street as a Modified Secondary Arterial; and (2) the westerly extension of Avenue 62 as a Modified Secondary Arterial west of Monroe Street. (DEIR, p. 3-42.) As is further described in the DEIR, the Travertine community land uses are proposed to be oriented on both sides of the Jefferson Street/Avenue 62 central spine roadway, with local loop collector roads emanating from the spine roadway via roundabouts to provide access to the neighborhoods. (DEIR Exhibit 3-14 (Circulation Plan).) The La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element identifies Avenue 62 at its current terminus at Dike No. 4 as a modified secondary arterial roadway. (DEIR, p. 3-42; La Quinta General Plan, Circulation Element, p. II-79; Exhibit II-2.) The Project proposes to extend Avenue 62 to cross over Dike No. 4. (DEIR, p. 3-30.) Riverside County Fire requires two access points to the Project site during both Project construction and Project operation to ensure adequate fire and emergency services (e.g., paramedics) to the site. (DEIR, pp. 4.14-19-4.14-20.) The extension of the existing terminus of Ave 62 west of Monroe Street and into the Project property has been approved by Riverside County Fire through the Fire Access Master Plan (FCMP2019-0008) as one of the two required points of access to the Project site. For this reason alone, elimination of the Avenue 62 crossing over Dike No. 4 is not feasible. Proposals to modify the crossing that have been provided to the City are likewise infeasible. For example, Avenue 62 cannot be "notched" into Dike No. 4 due to a number of reasons including 34200 Bob Nape Drive. Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 760.320.9811 MSACONSULTINGINC.COM 1086 proposed utilities, maintaining existing flood protection and preserving the integrity of the dike. The roadway will cross over the existing dike at a sufficient height (about 6') to allow for utilities to be placed without penetrating the dike. Penetrating the dike with utilities is discouraged by the Bureau of Reclamation considering the possibility of seepage to occur either along the utility trench or due to a leak and potentially causing a failure of the dike as earthen materials (fines) can be suspended and carried along the seepage path. Placing the roadway below the top of dike is also problematic due to utility issues described above and the potential for flood depths of fifteen (15) feet plus contained behind Dike No. 4. The Project has been designed to allow storm flows to travel around the Project and easterly to where the run-off is contained behind Dike No. 4. The Project improvements will not change or minimize the need for the protection that Dike No. 4 currently provides. II. The Extension of Avenue 62 Across Dike No. 4. There is no evidence that the proposed crossing of Avenue 62 over Dike No. 4 raises significant environmental concerns. Per DEIR Section 4.1, although the Avenue 62 crossing over Dike No. 4 would be visible from some private rear yards and golf course holes, impacts would not be significant because views of the panoramic Santa Rosa Mountains to the south and Coral Mountain to the west would remain largely visible due to their scale and massing. DEIR Exhibits 4.1-8, 14, and 15 illustrate that the bulk of visual impacts from the proposed crossing over Dike No. 4 fall within the area where the dike is already obstructing views to the southwest. Additional permanent changes to views at the top of the dike are minimal and considered to be less than significant. With respect to visual impact of trucks traveling at the height of a roadway atop the dike, a vehicle traveling 25 miles per hour over an estimated 20 feet of visibility at the top of the dike, would be visible for about 0.5 seconds.' Further, as discussed above, this visual contrast would not be considered significant because the vehicle would not appreciably alter the panoramic Santa Rosa Mountains to the south and Coral Mountain to the west, which is already obstructed by utility infrastructure (i.e., the already existing dike). As explained in the enclosed technical memorandum provided by Urban Crossroads, dated June 13, 2024, future long-range traffic volumes on Avenue 62 crossing over Dike No. 4 will not exceed a 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level. Pursuant to the City General Plan and noise ordinance, and as fully explained in the DEIR, the City does not consider noise impacts below 65 dBA CNEL to constitute a significant disturbance for residential and other noise sensitive uses. 'This calculation was derived as follows: 25 miles/ 1 hour = 132,000 feet / 60 minutes = 132,000 feet/3600 seconds 132,000 feet / 3600 seconds = 20 feet / X seconds X = 3600 seconds (20 feet) / 132,000 feet = 72,000 / 132,000 = 0.5 sec 34200 Bob Hope Drive. Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 760.320.9811 MSACONNSULTINGINC.COM 1087 Construction traffic including workers, fuel trucks, maintenance trucks, material delivery trucks, etc. generated by the proposed Project will influence the traffic noise levels in surrounding off -site areas. This includes Project truck trips on Avenue 62 crossing over Dike No. 4. DEIR, Appendix C.1(Air Quality Impact Analysis) documents that approximately 288 construction trips and 74 vendor trips are expected. The 362 daily construction truck trips represent a fraction (less than 3%) of the 14,000 daily trips used to estimate the conservative worst -case future long-range 2040 traffic conditions and noise levels presented on Table 3. Therefore, consistent with the finding of the traffic analysis, construction traffic will not exceed the 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level or constitute a significant disturbance for residential and other noise sensitive uses. III. Questions Regarding the Traffic Impact Study Roadway Segment Analysis. Table 1-7 in the Project Traffic Impact Study provides that average daily trips on Avenue 62 west of Monroe total 600 and 1800 in the existing condition and in 2031, respectively. The background growth on Avenue 62 for twelve years (from 2019 to 2031) is an interpolation of the `without project' volumes from 2019 to 2040, and it amounts to a total volume of 1,200 vehicle per day being added by 2031 to the 2019 volume of 600 vehicles per day west of Monroe. The addition of 1,200 vehicles per day is equivalent to the traffic generated by 127 single family detached homes. In other words, consistent with the City's anticipated growth projections, the annual background growth on Avenue 62 assumes the equivalent to 10 or 11 homes per year, occurring west of Monroe and east of the Project boundary. 34200 Bob Hope Drive. Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 760.320_9811 MSACONNSULTINGINC.COM 1088 OURBAN CROSSROADS June 17, 2024 Mr. Mark Rogers TRG Land, Inc. 898 Production Place Newport Beach, CA 92663 SUBJECT: TRAVERTINE SPECIFIC PLAN FOCUSED NOISE ASSESSMENT Dear Mr. Mark Rogers: Urban Crossroads, Inc. is pleased to provide this Focused Noise Assessment for the Travertine Specific Plan ("Project"), which is located west Madison Street, in the City of La Quinta, California. We have prepared this Focused Noise Assessment to respond to the specific questions that were raised at the May 28, 2024 hearing of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission regarding the traffic noise impacts associated with the Avenue 62 crossing over Dike #4. BACKGROUND On April 18, 2023, Urban Crossroads, Inc. prepared the Travertine Specific Plan Noise Impact Analysis ("NIA"). The NIA was prepared to satisfy applicable City of La Quinta noise standards and significance criteria based on guidance provided by Appendix G of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. While the NIA focuses on the noise impacts associated with the Existing, Phase 3 and 2040 Project traffic on eleven roadway segments, this Focused Noise Assessment identifies Project noise levels at individual receivers locations specifically adjacent to the Avenue 62 segment crossing over Dike #4. Focused Noise Assessment NOISE FUNDAMENTALS Noise is simply defined as "unwanted sound." Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm or when it has adverse effects on health. Noise is measured on a logarithmic scale of sound pressure level known as a decibel (dB). A -weighted decibels (dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to broad frequency noise source by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear. Exhibit 2-A presents a summary of the typical noise levels and their subjective loudness and effects that are described in more detail below. Since the range of intensities that the human ear can detect is so large, the scale frequently used to measure intensity is a scale based on multiples of 10, the logarithmic scale. The scale for measuring intensity is the decibel scale. Each interval of 10 decibels indicates a sound energy ten times greater than before, which is perceived by the human ear as being roughly twice as loud. (1) The most common sounds vary between 40 dBA (very quiet) to 100 dBA (very loud). Normal conversation at three feet is roughly at 60 dBA, while loud jet flyover noises equate to 110 dBA at approximately 1,000 feet, which can cause serious discomfort. (2) Another important aspect of noise is the duration of the sound and the way it is described and distributed in time. 12189-24 Focused Noise Assessment 1089 Mr. Mark Rogers TRG Land, Inc. June 17, 2024 Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT A: TYPICAL NOISE LEVELS COMMON Ol1TOOOn COMMON INDOOR A - WEIGHTED SUBJECTIVE EFFECTS OF ACTIVITIES J4CTlV1TIES SOUND LEVEL d8A LOUDNESS NOISE THRESHOLD OF PAIN 140 INTOLERABLE OR DEAFENING HEARING LOSS VERY NOISY NEAR JET ENGINE 130 120 JET FLY -OVER AT 300rn (10ODft) ROCK RAND 110 LOUD AUTO HORN 100 GAS LAWN MOWER AT I (3 ft] 90 DIES ELTRUCK ATISm(50ft), FOOD BLENDER AT1m(3ft) 80 at 80 km/hr (50 mph) NOISY URBAN AREA. DAYTIME yACuuM [LEANER AT 3m (10ft) 70 SPEECH LOUD INTERFERENCE HEAVY TRAFFIC AT 90m (30O ft) NORMAL SPEECH AT 1m (3 ft) so QUIET URBAN DAYTIME LARGE BUSINESS OFFICE 50 MODERATE SLEEP DISTURBANCE QUIET URBAN NIGHT1jME THEATER, LARGE CONFERENCE 40 ROOM (BACKGROUND) OUIET SUBURBAN NIGHTTIME LIBRARY 3D FAINT QUIET RURAL NIGHTTIME BEDROOM AT NIGHT, CONCERT 20 HALL (BACKGROUND) 10 NO EFFECT BROADCASTIRECORDING STUDIO 0 VERY FAINT LOWEST THRESHOLD Of HUMAN LOWEST THRESHOLD OF HUMAN HEARING HEARING RECEIVER LOCATIONS To assess the Avenue 62 crossing over Dike #4 noise impacts, the following nearby residential receiver locations, as shown on Exhibit A, were identified as representative locations for analysis. Sensitive uses or receivers are generally defined as locations where people reside or where the presence of unwanted sound could otherwise adversely affect the use of the land. To describe the potential off -site noise levels, ten receiver locations in the vicinity of the Project site were identified, including the location of the nearest existing noise sensitive residential receiver (R6 - 81307 Jasmine Ct.) located approximately 343 feet north of Avenue 62. Other sensitive land uses in the Project study area that are located at greater distances than those identified in this noise study will experience lower noise levels than those presented in this report due to the additional attenuation from distance and the shielding of intervening structures. Distance is measured in a straight line from the centerline to each receiver location. 12189-24 Focused Noise Assessment , uR6JAN Mr. Mark Rogers TRG Land, Inc. June 17, 2024 Page 3 of 7 EXHIBIT A: NEAREST NOISE SENSITIVE RESIDENTIAL RECEIVER LOCATIONS .A_ M � - � f L�.• �[14 � • � aJ �+ � rye Ole ,�. LZ : *`�' + `c- - ,� � • . Gam. � �• � �, ti��� �Sy�. ����, � moo, � k gn LM Cn ML �a � • k :-'�; :9; � � ' ,tip � - •y's r �'�sx 1 � i � '_ _ " � l - --- - `■ r LEGEND: Receiver locations qO Av. 62 Centerline —a Distance from receiver to Au 62 centerline {in feet) 12189-24 Focused Noise Assessment , uR6 Mr. Mark Rogers TRG Land, Inc. June 17, 2024 Page 4 of 7 TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS This section analyzes the potential traffic noise impacts at the ten nearby residential receiver locations from the traffic going over the berm at the Avenue 62 crossing of Dike #4. Table 1 presents a summary of the roadway parameters used to predict the future exterior noise levels. The traffic volumes shown on Table 1 reflect future long-range 2040 traffic conditions that include both the Project traffic volumes and background traffic growth. The average daily traffic volumes are based Travertine Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) (3) To ensure that the traffic noise analysis evaluates the reasonable worst - case traffic noise conditions, the change in elevation due to the roadway profile grade as well as the full throttle noise emissions due to vehicle acceleration and engine noise on Avenue 62 crossing over Dike #4 were assumed in the analysis. Changes in vehicle speeds are largely influenced by the engine noise of accelerating vehicles instead of the deceleration associated with vehicle braking. (4) TABLE 1: ROADWAY PARAMETERS ID Road Segment Classification 2040 Average Daily Near/Far Lane Speed Traffic Volume Distance (Feet)2 (mph) 6 Av. 62 w/o Monroe St. Modified Secondary 14,000 42' 50 Source: Travertine Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Table 2 presents the time -of -day vehicle splits across a 24-hour timeframe and the traffic flow distributions (vehicle mix) used for this analysis. The vehicle mix is expressed as a percentage of the overall daily vehicle splits for all vehicle types. The vehicle mix used for purposes of this evaluation is the same as is presented on Tables 6-3 and 6-4 of the NIA and comprises heavy and medium trucks and autos, expressed as a percentage of the total modeled traffic flow by each vehicle type. This explains why the heavy truck time of day splits appear to disproportionally occur during the nighttime hours. As shown on Table 2, roughly 75% of the traffic volumes take place during the daytime hours, with 14% during the evening hours and 11% during the nighttime hours. Less than 1% of the project traffic is expected to consist of heavy trucks with approximately 2% medium trucks and the remaining 97% consisting of autos. The vehicle mix assumptions employed in the NIA are representative of a typical Southern California vehicle mix consistent with the required traffic noise modeling parameters outlined County of Riverside Office of Industrial Hygiene Requirements for Determining and Mitigating Traffic Noise Impacts to Residential Properties. (4) 12189-24 Focused Noise Assessment , uR6 Mr. Mark Rogers TRG Land, Inc. June 17, 2024 Page 5 of 7 TABLE 2: AVENUE 62 VEHICLE MIX Time of Day Vehicle Mix Time of Day Split Autos Medium Trucks Heavy Trucks Daytime 73.60% 0.90% 0.35% 74.85% Evening 13.60% 0.04% 0.04% 13.68% Nighttime 10.22% 0.90% 0.35% 11.47% Daily 97.42% 1.84% 0.74% 100.00% 1 County of Riverside Office of Industrial Hygiene. Values rounded to the nearest one -hundredth. Vehicle mix percentage values rounded to the nearest one -hundredth. "Daytime" = 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.; "Evening" = 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.; "Nighttime" = 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. The expected future noise levels at residential receivers identified in Exhibit A were calculated using, the parameters outlined in Tables 1 and 2, and the planned Avenue 62 roadway elevation profile accounting for noise source activities at the elevated top of Dike #4. Table 3 presents these calculations as a summary of future exterior noise levels for the private outdoor living areas of the residences closest to the top of the Avenue crossing and that are shown in Exhibit A. Table 3 indicates that the exterior noise levels will range from 52.1 to 59.9 dBA CNEL. Table 3 shows that the future long-range traffic volumes on Avenue 62 crossing over Dike #4 will not exceed a 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level. As documented in the Project EIR, the city does not consider noise impacts below 65 dBA CNEL to constitute a significant disturbance for residential and other noise sensitive uses. TABLE 3: AVENUE 62 EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE Receiver Location' Address Av. 62 Traffic Noise Levels (dBA CNEL)Z Exterior Noise Level Standards (dBA CNEL)3 Noise Level Standards Exceeded?' R1 81272 Jasmine Ct. 52.9 65 No R2 81260 Jasmine Ct. 56.7 65 No R3 81271 Jasmine Ct. 59.9 65 No R4 81283 Jasmine Ct. 58.7 65 No R5 81295 Jasmine Ct. 55.8 65 No R6 81307 Jasmine Ct. 52.1 65 No R7 81319 Jasmine Ct. 54.8 65 No R8 81337 Rustic Cyn. Dr. 55.0 65 No R9 81349 Rustic Cyn. Rd. 57.7 65 No R10 81361 Rustic Cyn. Rd. 57.2 65 No 1 see Exhibit A for the receiver locations. z Future Avenue 62 exterior traffic noise levels with crossing over Dike #4. a City of La Quinta General Plan Noise Element Policy N-1.2) ° Do the estimated Avenue 62 traffic noise levels exceed the noise level standards? 12189-24 Focused Noise Assessment , uR6 Mr. Mark Rogers TRG Land, Inc. June 17, 2024 Page 6 of 7 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC NOISE ANALYSIS Construction traffic including workers, fuel trucks, maintenance trucks, material delivery trucks, etc. generated by the proposed Project will influence the traffic noise levels in surrounding off -site areas. This includes Project truck trips on Avenue 62 crossing over Dike 44. Based on the construction worker and vendor demand estimates from Travertine Specific Plan Air Quality Impact Analysis, approximately 288 construction trips and 74 vendor trips are expected. The 362 daily construction truck trips represent a fraction (less than 3%) of the 14,000 daily trips used to estimate the conservative worst -case future long-range 2040 traffic conditions and noise levels presented on Table 3. Therefore, consistent with the finding of the traffic analysis, construction traffic will not exceed the 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise level or constitute a significant disturbance for residential and other noise sensitive uses. CONCLUSIONS Consistent with the findings of the NIA, this Focused Noise Assessment shows that the Project traffic associated with the Avenue 62 crossing over Dike #4 will not exceed the City of La Quinta 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise standards (City of La Quinta General Plan Noise Element Policy N-1.2). Therefore, consistent with the findings in the NIA, the traffic noise impacts are considered less than significant at the nearby noise -sensitive receiver locations. Respectfully submitted, URBAN CROSSROADS, INC. Bill Lawson, P.E., INCE Principal REFERENCES 1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Transit Administration. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Manual. September 2018. 2. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Noise Abatement and Control. Information on Levels of Environmental Noise Requisite to Protect Public Health and Welfare with an Adequate Margin of Safety. March 1974. EPA/ONAC 550/9/74-004. 3. Urban Crossroads, Inc. Travertine Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis. September 2021. 4. National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP Report 791). Supplemental Guidance of the Application of FHWA's Traffic Noise Model (TNM). 2014. 12189-24 Focused Noise Assessment LO/ URB A4 Mr. Mark Rogers TRG Land, Inc. June 17, 2024 Page 7 of 7 County of Riverside, Office of Industrial Hygiene. Requirements for Determining and Mitigating Traffic Noise Impacts to Residential Structures. April 2015. 6. City of La Quinta. Municipal Code, Sections 9.100, 6.08. 12189-24 Focused Noise Assessment , uR6 ATTACHMENT 6 PUBLIC COMMENT Travertine 1096 Tania Flores From: Sent: To: Subject: Attachments: Cheri Flores Tuesday, July 30, 2024 2:35 PM Tania Flores FW: Travertine Travertine.docx a Cheri L. Flores I Planning Manager City of La Quints V" Ira 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph.760-777-7067 CALIFORNIAI www.laquintaca.gov From: Martin Brewer <martincbrewer@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 11:52 AM To: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Travertine EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. You don't often get email from martincbrewer(c?comcast.net. Learn why this is important Hello, Please forward the attached to the members of the City Council for their consideration at the August 6, 2024, meeting on this subject. Thank you. Martin Brewer i 1097 To: La Quinta City Council From: Martin Brewer Subject: Travertine Development Date: July 30, 2024 My wife and I own a home in Trilogy La Quinta. Our residence is at the south end of the development, near Avenue 62. We understand that the Travertine developers currently plan to make Avenue 62 the main entry into their development, rather than a more direct route via Jefferson Street. In listening to the presentation by the applicant, it appears they have taken this position primarily as a matter of convenience, as they do not want to develop a Jefferson Street entry until they are able to get another developer to share the cost. Their "convenience" will have a major impact on us and others whose homes are near Avenue 62. The number of vehicles anticipated to use Avenue 62 during and after construction, day and night, is astronomical, which will cause unacceptable noise and pollution. To make matters worse, to get over the berm ("Dike No. 4") on Avenue 62 leading to the development, they are proposing a bridge that will be aesthetically unpleasing, noisy, block views, and compromise the privacy of those living adjacent to it. The applicant has produced reports and "experts" to attest to their position that none of this is going to be a problem of any significance. Much of what these reports and "experts" talk about is difficult for the lay person to understand, given the technological jargon, terms of art, and assessments that I believe only professionals can really decipher. But my "common sense" tells me, and I hope yours will tell you, that using Avenue 62 will unnecessarily burden Trilogy residents for the reasons given above, particularly since there is a better alternative (Jefferson Street) available. I am not opposed to this development, only the plans to use Avenue 62 as its main entrance. I am requesting that the development not be approved unless and until the developer amends it to make its entrance via Jefferson Street, not Avenue 62. Respectfully submitted, Martin Brewer 81625 Rustic Canyon Drive, La Quinta (Trilogy) 1098 Tania Flores From: Alena Callimanis <acallimanis@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 9, 2024 6:02 PM To: Planning WebMail; Tania Flores; Cheri Flores Subject: Public Comments not on agenda July 9, 2024 please also send this to the Planning Commision Attachments: Required approvals for Travertine.pdf, Untitled attachment 00009.htm My apologies for being so nervous today. I totally forgot to discuss this very important comment. Could you please forward this to the Planning Commissioners as well? Thank you. Alena ********************** Commissioners, I apologize that I forgot to also bring up this comment. This is from the Travertine DEIR Executive Summary page 1-4. The exact page is attached below. The Travertine DEIR will require the approval from the following federal, State and local agencies: • Bureau of Land Management • Bureau of Reclamation • US Fish and Wildlife Services • US Army Corp of Engineers • California Department of Fish and Wildlife • State Water Resources Control Board • Coachella Valley Water District This is whyyou need to see that status of all these approvals before you can approve the Final EIR for the City Council. Respectfully, Alena Alena Callimanis 81469 Rustic Canyon Dr La Quinta, CA 92253 919 606-6164 acallimanis@gmail.com i 1099 1_0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of La Qu inta is the lead agency under CEQA and has the principal approval auth ority over the proposed Project. The following discretionary actlons and approvals are required by the City- • Certification of the El (EA 2017-0008) ■ Adoption of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 2017-0002) • Adoption of a Zone Change €2C 2017-0002j ■ Adoption of the Travertine Specific Plan Amendment SPA 2017-0004j * Approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 37387 (TTM 37387) €TTM 2017-0008) * Approval of a Development Agreement (CA 2021-D001) In addition, the proposed Project will require approval from the following federal, State and local agencies - Bureau of Land Management o Approval of additional riglZt-of-way along Jefferson Street to widen and/or extend the road to the Project site. * Bureau of Reclamation o Approval of additional right-of-way along Avenue 52 in order to widen and/or extend the road into the Project site. Approval of a portion of the extension of Mad icon as an EVA for the project and access for CVWD, • United States Fish and Wildlife Service o Irnplementation of Project -specific 1995 Biological Opinion and Incidental Take Permlt and June 2, 2023 Concurrence in Bureau of Land Management and Bureau of Reclamation's No Adverse Effects Determination a United States of Army Corps of Engineers o Approved Jurisdictional Determination (A11131 or similar approval from the Corps to receive concurrence that ephemeral aquatic features within the Project site do not qualify as waters of the U.S. ( oU5) and therefore a re not subject to regulation under Section 404 + California Department of Fish and Wildlife o tmplernentation of Biological Opinlon and Incidental Take Permit for the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Phan and review of the proposed improvements in Plan ning Area 20 for the water tanks a nd related Infrastructure (road, pipelines). State Water Resources Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (Region 7) o Construction Stormwater General Permit, Notice of Intent to Comply wlth Section 402 of the Clean Water Act o Construction Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan �S PPPj • Coachella Valley Water District c Approval of the proposed water tanks and related Infrastructure; off -site and on -site drainage systems, improvements to the Guadalupe dikes in conjunction with the improvements to Jefferson Street; o Approval of Regional and Local Hydrology/Drainage Studies Trk�rtine Draft EIR 1-4 October2023 38 1100 Tania Flores From: teamharri@aol.com Sent: Monday, July 29, 2024 7:43 PM To: Cheri Flores; Tania Flores Subject: Letter for Council members about Travertine Project Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. You don't often get email from teamharri@aol.com. Learn why this is important La Quinta City Council Members, I am unable to verify if people who enjoy the desert canyons and mountains will be able to access the "Open Space" as well as the jumble of rocks that is the lower end of the Martinez Landslide when the Travertine project is built. I spoke with Cheri Flores, City Planner, about this. She believed people would NOT be allowed in these areas due to critical wild life habitat issues and sensitive cultural places. I sent letters to the email addresses of the 3 contacts Cheri gave me, in hopes of getting my questions answered. Mark Rogers of TRG Land, Inc. kindly replied. Mark stated outside agencies were involved due to wildlife and cultural issues. But I wasn't clear if that meant people wouldn't be able to access the "Open Space" and the mountain itself. Vincent Jones at US Fish and Wildlife Service and Jacob Skaggs of CA Dept. of Fish and Wildlife have not yet responded to my letters sent 7/19/24. The mountain itself and the area at the base of the Martinez Landslide has been one of the many important family and friends gathering places for 5 generations of our family. For over a 100 years members of our family have been blessed to explore the area (always leaving it cleaner than we found it). Our adventures left us strong physically and nurtured a deep appreciation of the beauty of God's creation as well as strengthening the bond of friendship as we gathered as a multigenerational group of family and friends. I'm writing for my extended family and other families and people yet to be born , in saying people MUST have access to the desert and canyons. Long ago I went to the La Quinta Planning Commission meetings when the original Travertine Project was being considered. I spoke about the need for people to have continued access to the mountains and canyons. It was agreed that there would be a parking area near the south west portion of the project to provide that close access. The current project does not have the south west parking area, but I believe it has a parking area just as you would cross over the dike at Ave. 62. This would make a long walk to get to the base of the landslide and would not allow for the multigenerational gatherings that have been so treasured by our family and others. If building this project means no close access to the mountains and canyons, I don't feel it should be approved. 1101 There are other reasons why I, personally don't like the project... increased noise and much increased traffic, more users of water, when the State Water Board is calling for reduced use of water and more. Do we want our desert canyons filled with homes? It seems as if we are ruining what sets our area apart and makes it special for people to come to our area. Thank you for "hearing" the words of my heart. I know there are many different voices with other ideas, and I so appreciate that you took the time to hear myvoice. Gratefully, Janice Harrison 82080 65th Ave Thermal. CA 92274 760 578 1846 Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS 1102 From: teamharriCalaol.com To: Cheri Flores; Tania Flores Subject: 2nd part of letter to council members, Travertine Date: Monday, July 29, 2024 8:11:21 PM EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. IYou don't often get email from teamharri@aol.com. Learn why this is important To La Quinta Council Members, Some pictures to go with my letter. Pictures can say more than words... Celebrating what was my dad's final birthday at base of landslide 1103 IL CIO i i .o 1;1. ;� f Enjoying a cozy perch after a big climb 1105 Tania Flores From: teamharri@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 2:04 PM To: Cheri Flores; Tania Flores Subject: Added note on Travertine EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. IYou don't often get email from teamharri@aol.com. Learn why this is important 7/30/24 Hi, Please add that Jacob Skaggs of California Dept of Fish and Wildlife did get back to me today. He had been on vacation. He called and we talked but off the top of his head he was not sure where people would or would not be allowed and he wasn't sure if the parking area over the dike would be for the public. Thankyou, Janice Harrison Sent from the all new AOL app for iOS 1107 1108 ta Qua GEM nPhl PESERI — DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO.3 STVR QUARTERLY REPORT APRIL 1, 2024 - JUNE 303 2024 THE STVR PROGRAM CONSISTS OF PERMITTING, LICENSING, TAX COLLECTION, AND COMPLIANCE MONITORING AND ENFORCEMENT PERMITTING Number of STVR Permits: The City Clerk's Office issues all new and renewed STVR permits and related business licenses, handles Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT) collections, and assists STVR property owners with keeping their property in compliance with the STVR program. June 2024 - Total STVR Permits: 1,275 1 (Estate Permits: 72) 1,175 1000 500 53 47 0 m. Homeshares Figure 1 Primary Residence General Permits Active STVR Permits by Area - 2021, 2022, 2023, & 2024 Q-2: JAN-21 JAN-22 JAN-23 JAN-24 JUN-24 North La Quinta 140 115 110 110 112 Mid La Quinta 148 122 92 90 92 The Cove 292 252 236 226 232 South La Quinta (PGA West) 470 354 317 301 295 Table 1 1109 COMPLIANCE Complaints: The Code Compliance Department handles all compliance related matters for the STVR program, which includes managing complaints, conducting investigations, and taking enforcement actions, such as issuing notices of violations, administrative citations, and STVR permit suspensions. 2023 & Q-1 & Q-2 2024 STVR Complaints Citywide by Area Q-1 2023 81 Q-2 2023 � � � 141 Q-3 2023 47 Q-4 2023 54 Q-12024 m 88 Q-2 2024 153 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 North LQ Mid LQ a Cove South LQ (PGA West) Exempt Areas Figure 2 IC Complaints: January - June 2024 Permitted vs. Unpermitted 92 75 -------------------------------- 50 --- ----------------------------- 25 32 31 ----------- 16 13 16 13 M 150 100 .11 0 6 4 9 6 3 M 0 0 M_ JAN-24 FEB-24 MAR-24 APR-24 MAY-24 JUN-24 Figure 3 Permitted Unpermitted YOY Quarterly Complaints: 2022 - 2024 153 --1-0-�------- 54 Q-1 Q-2 Q-3 Q-4 Figure 4 0 2022 M 2023 2024 Citations: El 2023 & 2024 Q-1 & Q-2 STVR Citations: Permitted vs. Unpermitted Q-12023 Q-2 2023 Q-3 2023 Q-4 2023 Q-12024 Q-2 2024 Figure 5 Permitted Citations Unpermitted Citations Figure 6 shows the vast majority of citations in 2023 and Q-1 & Q-2 of 2024 were 40 issued for administrative matters, primarily for operating and/or advertising without an STVR permit: 20 - 73% in 2024 Q-1 & Q-2 - 93% in 2023 0 Figure 5 shows the vast majority of citations in 2023 and Q-1 & Q-2 of 2024 were issued to unpermitted properties: - 71 % in 2024 Q-1 & Q-2 - 87% in 2023 2023 & 2024 Q-1 & Q-2 STVR Citations: Administrative vs. Disturbance Q-12023 Q-2 2023 Q-3 2023 Q-4 2023 Q-12024 Q-2 2024 Administrative Citations Disturbance Citations Figure 6 1112 The STVR program collects Transient Occupancy Tax (TOT), fees for citations and inspections, and all program operating costs such as STVR permit and business licensing fees. Table 2 below provides an overview of the annual STVR program revenues for calendar years 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, and 2024 Q-1 & Q-2. STVR Annual Revenue Summary: 2020 - 2023, & 2024 Q-1 & Q-2 - I, 2024 Transient Occupancy Tax Revenue (TOT) S4.513.084-58 5 921 343.52 $6.586.847.92 $13.179.124 96 4,169,184.70 x itation Fine Collections_ 327,111-82 $447,950-01 $180,750-00 $242,591-6 $57,066-18 STVR Permit Fee $307,781.00 $758,780.00 $943,150.00 $957,750.00 $466,000.00 STVR Permit Inspection Fee $9,425-00 $1.950-00 $1,300-00 $1.950-00 $1.300-00 STVR Permit Business LFee $55,000 estimated $50 000 estimated(estimated)$60,786-00 $47 000icense $23 793-00 Total STVR PermitslLicensi Fees: $ 372,206-00 $810,730-00 $991.450-00 $1.010,486-00 $491.093-00 1$4,717,343.881 Table 2 *Citation Fine Collections are current as of July 16, 2024 1113 ATTACHMENT 1 STVR AREAS CALIFORNIA - :xempt Areas Exemption Tourist Commercial District Tourist Commercial District & Development Agreement Tourist Commercial District & Adjacent to TC District Village Commercial District Village Commercial District Tourist Commercial District / SilverRock Resort Specific Plan Development Agreement Tourist Commercial District Entitlement Approval St Tourist Commercial District- Undeveloped st Tourist Commercial District - Undeveloped Development Agreement Estates at Griffin Lake Specific Plan Large Lot Qualified & Certified; Resolution No. 2024-011 Large Lot Qualified & Certified; Resolution No. 2024-012 City Boundary ■ STVR Exempt Area STVR Exempt Area - Large Lot Qualified & Certified ity Areas North La Quinta Cove Mid La Quinta South La Quinta 1114 N 0 1 2 Miles ATTACHMENT 2 Number of Permitted STVR Properties per Development 1,275 Active STVR Permits as of 6/30/2024* North La Quinta Cove Acacia 11 The Cove 231 Bella Vista 9 Large Lot Qualified & Certified 1 Cactus Flower 10 Cove Total STVR Permits 232 Del Rey 2 Desert Pride 11 Mid La Quinta Indian Springs Neighborhood 6 Avenida La Fonda Neighborhood (Desert Club TR Unit 2) 2 La Quinta Del Oro (Not Gated) 7 Calle Fortuna Neighborhood (Desert Club TR Unit 1) 3 La Quinta Highlands 14 Desert Club Estates (Desert Club TR Unit 5) 17 Marbella 4 Enclave 1 Monticello 11 Haciendas at La Quinta 1 Quinterra 3 Highland Palms Neighborhood 14 Rancho Ocotillo 3 Montero Estates (No HOA) 1 Sonrisa 7 Large Lot Qualified & Certified 1 Topaz 10 Renaissance 1 Vista Grande 2 Sagebrush Neighborhood (Desert Club Manor TR 1) 6 Westward Ho/Westward Shadows 1 Santa Rosa Cove 43 Westward Isle 1 Seasons at La Quinta (Residential) 2 North La Quinta Total STVR Permits: 112 Mid La Quinta Total STVR Permits: 92 South La Quinta Estates at La Quinta 1 Exempt Casitas Las Rosas 73 Homewood Suites (La Quinta Desert Villas) 1 Legacy Villas 213 Mery Griffin Estate 1 La Quinta Fairways 4 PGA West:Signature 157 PGA West: Fairways 95 Polo Villas 18 PGA West: Res 1 133 Puerta Azul 38 PGA West: Res II 60 Spa Villas at LQ Resort 10 Village at the Palms 2 Tennis Villas 33 South La Quinta Total STVR Permits: 295 Exempt Total STVR Permits 544 *This information is current as of June 30, 2024 and is updated on a quarterly basis 24/7 STVR HOTLINE - (760) 777-7 ALL CALLS MADE TO THE 24/7 STVR HOTLINE ARE ROUTED ACCORDINGLY DEPENDING ON THE DAY/TIME OF THE CALL AS SHOWN BELOW CITY CODE COMPLIANCE ANSWERS CALL TO HOTLINE IS THE CALL AND GATHERS COMPLAINT RECEIVED AND PROPERTY INFORMATION FROM CALLER* A HOTLINE VENDOR ANSWERS CALL CALL TO HOTLINE IS AND GATHERS COMPLAINT AND RECEIVED PROPERTY IN A CALL TO HOTLINE IS m HOTLINE VENDOR ANSWERS CALL AND RECEIVED GATHERS COMPLAINT AND PROPERTY INFORMATION FROM CALLER CITY CODE OFFICER IS DISPATCHED TO PROPERTY. DEPENDING ON SITUATION, LOCAL CONTACT MAY BE CALLED** CITY CONTRACTED SECURITY PATROL )FFICER IS DISPATCHED TO PROPERTY. DEP HOTLINE VENDOR CONTACTS LOCAL CONTACT ON FILE FOR STVR PROPERTY TO ADDRESS COMPLAINT OR SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT IF NEEDED t(V QUI N(4j — GEM oftbe DESERT — DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO. 4 COMMUNITY SERVICES QUARTERLY REPORT Community Programs & Social Services Wellness Center, FIND Food Distribution, Fritz Burns Pool. & Sports Wellness Center provided fitness & recreation programs along with hiking opportunities to 12,625 participants/fitness members (11,426 fitness gym participants; and 1,199 program participants for SRR Resident Cards, Luncheons, AARP Tax, Love & Love Tennis, Yoga Flow, Pilates, Ballroom Dance, Deep Stretch, Essential Fitness, Pickleball 101, Tai Chi Yang, Social S�a Bridge, Monday Movies, Mah Jongg, Ukulele, Dominoes, and Quilting for Good Times). Social - service offerings such as the Riverside County Cool Center, HICAP, and FIND outreach were available to the public. X Desert Recreation District (DRD) served 1,823 participants (1,098 for open/lap swim, youth swim lessons, Adaptive Swim lessons; Parent & Me lessons; Lifeguard Pre -Qualification, and Lenny the Shark Water Safety; 351 Water Aerobics; 252 Senior Splash; and 122 Dive -In on FA Movie) at Fritz Burns Pool programs/classes. Youth sports programs had 32,204 total participants (players, spectators, coaches) for AYSO it (soccer — 20,200), Friday Night Lights (flag football — 2,525), and La Quinta Youth Sports 04A Association (baseball — 9,310). Practices and league games are held at La Quinta Park, 40 4 ro Colonel Mitchell Paige Middle School, and the La Quinta Sports Complex. Open Court Time 4 ©' volleyball and basketball programs, a City of La Quinta partnership with DRD, had a total of 169 participants at the La Quinta Boys & Girls Club Gym. Distributed 25,925 pounds of food (food packages/boxes of dry goods and produce) to 840 6*0 persons at Coral Mountain, Hadley Villas, Vista Dunes, Washington Street Apartments, and Wolff Waters; FIND also provides mobile pantries for food distribution two times per month at Horizon High School and La Quinta Community Fitness Center & Park. is 1117 La Quinta Library Gircuiation/ Programs/ Events • Attendance: 26,400+ persons visited and participated in various programs; 55,200+ items were circulated; 5,585 participated in various programs, meetings, and events. During this quarter there were 7,646 reference questions, 1,850 computer sessions, and 4,229 wireless sessions. • Events: Dia de los Ninos Cultural Fair (included cultural booths and special performances) and Summer Reading Program activities (Monday Morning Movies, SRP Music Show, SRP Reptile Show, and SRP Galaxy Dance Party). • Programs: Baby/Toddler Storytimes; Sensory Hour, Library Birthday Party, Teen Anime Cafe, Level Up LQ, Graphic Novel Club, Read the World, Readers Club, Pagemaster's Book Club, Page Turners Book Club, Chess Club, and Adult Speaker Series. La Quinta Library Dia de Los IiOos Cultural Fair • The La Quinta Library held the annual Dia de los Wos Cultural Fair on Saturday, April 20t" with approximately 800+ people attending. The event included cultural booths, crafts, carnival style games, performances, surprises, and a story walk throughout Civic Center Campus. The goal of this event is to connect kids to the world of learning through books, stories, and program offerings at the library. .41 :•� ��t f• � 'fir �� _ �ti,� 1101 AM-1:0PM MAKER CRAFT--► ON sEssmx a<: w:3a An • �:oo PM SESSION 6:1:30 PH -3:00 PM MARIONETTE BIRD BUILD ,; 1 LEARN HOW TO CONSTRUCT A SIMPLE ' BIRD -LIRE MARIONETTE PUPPET ONLY 8 SPOTS AVAILABLE PER SESSION, SO RSVP! - AGES 7- TO ATTEND & LQ—EffS-C,N04AQUINTACA.WV 1760.777.70BS I OLQCREATPONSTAT1014 Ruoff) MAKERSPACE r.1uRn2. M A E r•13 I ER DAMP EAR{TH DAY CRAFTS Celebrate the planet we call home with some Earth Daft inspired crafts. LOMAKCRSPACEOLAOUINTACA.GOv 1760 777 7OS8 I,P'LOCREATIONST—ON .■■® LOMAKERSPACOKAOUINTACA.00V17OM77'7.70MIOLQCRrATK1NSTA.nON .■.M ,,.L Fiber Arts I A� 3� I� zg 4 a.E;.a. fAB Pom Pam FlowersE Bootcamp I earn how to create a fiber ry 0T, art flower out of a yarn pom frJ e� pom and some felt petals. 001 yr � -00-aE} [IEBTI?1r 6iRilal LOMAKER9PACE*LAQU1NTACA.08V 11FM777.7068 i ✓eeLQC.REA1noN9r^Tim ■..� HKEE M07 rt AR WA THE A 4 BEW.TH 0 thh AM 10:30 -- 5:OD PM Celebrate STAR WARS Day at the Creation Station. Make a paper towel rolt lightsaber, construct a paper bag Jedi or select a 30 Printed model kit to build a starship ordroid from the franchise. OECD S111I0N FREE I All Ages I While Supplies Last L-OMA K E RSPhO E@LAQU I NTACA-Coy 1760-777-7(M 16LOCREATIO14STATLON f RIVERSIDE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM {IE�Roilris'kr11 Creation Stat ion 170-275 C. Tampico. La puinte. CA $2253 f111! `T" Igreakerapaeeolaqu inT8ca.gov1760.777.7008 �� La Quinta Museum Exhibits/Programs/Events • Attendance: 1,600+ visitors/participants. • Exhibits: Mission Grafica and La Quinta Legends: The Fisherman Steps • Events: Music at the Museum (Highroad Rock & Roll Band and The Mudbugs); Creative Conversations (The Wordkeepers); Field Trips: Ben Franklin Elementary; Tours: Daughters of the American Revolution; La Quinta Historical Society meeting; Summer Family Fun: Snakes! • Programs: Good Reads in the Gallery Book Club (Violeta by Isabel Allende, Sabrina & Corina by Kali Fajardo-Anstine, and The Fire Next Time by James Baldwin) and STITCH Fiber Arts Club, TED Talk Discussion, Take a Break with Huell, Genealogy Club, Sketchbook Journaling, and Museum Kids Summer Art Sessions. • Social Media Promotion: Friday Fun Facts and Exhibit Content is shared via social media with Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and YouTube subscribers. 1121 V INERis , �G P51OREA 5 f 4&4 r - A TRIBUTE TO FLEETUVOOO MAC BRING YOUR FRIENDS 5 FAMILY TO ROCS{ OUT AT THE MAY CONCERT IN THE PARK! SATURDAY, MAY A, 2024 [ SILUERROCK PARK 17 PM PLAYINLAQUINTA.COM FOR MORE INFO l NO, t t` 'J{ S IJ NEPARK,�R,. SATURDAY, DUNE 1, 2024 1 7:30 PM AT SIL VERROCK PARK Invite your Friends a nd family Coe njoy Salsa Funk, Cha-Cha, Boogaloo, Cumhia. and more at the ] u ne Co ncert i n the Par k! V& �a Community Events Annual City Picnic and Birthday Celebration @ Civic Center Campus • The City of La Quinta's annual Picnic and Birthday Celebration took place on Saturday, April 27 from 9 a.m. — 12 p.m. at the Civic Center Campus. Approximately 1,000 people were in attendance. The city provided small succulent plants, La Quinta branded coloring books, recycling/ composting information, and various other items. • The La Quinta Rotary provided free hot dogs and the Cone Zone provided free snow cones. Party Pals bought out their inflatable slides, rock climbing wall, and trampoline jump. Nothing Bundt Cakes provided the City birthday cake, Algo Dulce Sum Sweets provided cupcakes, and Crumble Cookie provided individual boxed cookies. • Performances were provided by Dance, Play, & Pretend, Beginning Ballet, Doug Hassett, Mariachi del Ayer, Natasha Terrell, La Quinta High School Cheer, Choir, and Theater Troup. • Businesses that participated include Action Park Alliance (APA), Algo Dulce Sum Sweets, Alliant Special Event Insurance, Burrtec Waste and Recycling, CFLC Sheltering Palm Springs, Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control District, Coachella Valley Yarn, Jewish Family Services, Cone Zone, Crumble Cookie, CVWD, Desert Recreation District (DRD), Elder Love, Grocery Outlet, LH Productions, La Quinta Boys & Girls Club, La Quinta Creation Station, La Quinta Fire Department, La Quinta Historical Society, La Quinta Library, La Quinta Museum, Riverside County Sheriff's Department, La Quinta Rotary, Nothing Bundt Cakes, Old Town Artisan Studio, Palm Desert La Quinta Football/Cheer, Party Pals, Scouts BSA Troops #1701 & #451, SCRAP Gallery, TerraMar Travel, Tuff Shed, and Tops & Barricades. 1123 Community Events Fly Over LQ Kite Experience @ SilverRock Park A KITE EXPERIENCE Saturday} April $ 18 AM -10 AM At SilverRock Park J ' Join us in crafting, designing, and soaring high with your incredible kite creations! �a - ■•r .jr.. .ram ,.L�t � r - -- .i ra S ._ . . • The annual Fly Over LQ Kite Experience took place on Saturday, April 6th from 8:00-10:00 a.m. at SilverRock Park. • Participants were able to bring their own or make a kite on -site. City provided kite making kits and Scouts BSA and Ophelia Girls were there to assist participants. Approximately 100+ persons participated in this event. 1124 X Park Bike & Skate Programs/ Events/ Memberships PARK • Attendance: 3,649 residents and 2,535 non-residents used the park this quarter. Park hours: 7 days a week, 12:00 — 9:00 p.m. (Monday — Friday) and 9:00 a.m. — 9:00 p.m. (Saturday — Sunday) April; 5 days a week 12:00 — 9:00 p.m. (Wednesday -Friday) and 9:00 a.m. — 9:00 p.m. Saturday -Sunday (May — June). • Total Memberships: 100 memberships sold this quarter (71 resident and 29 non- resident). Overall memberships sold to date is approximately 1,327 (912 resident and 415 non-resident). • Programs: Olympian Maze Paris and Red Bull team visited the park, BMX Jam, BMX Night, Mini Skate Camp Pop-up, Scooter Jam, Quad Lesson Meet -up, Summer Camp Week 1, and Go Skate Day. • Events: CV AM Skate Contest, Coachiller Pop Contest, Friday Night Contests, and Memorial Day Quad Jam. 1125 1126 DEPARTMENTAL REPORT ITEM NO.5 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING STAFF REPORT TO: Madam Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Scott Nespor, Senior Planner August 6, 2024 SUBJECT Southern Sphere of Influence Outreach Update At the March 19, 2024 Council Study Session on the Southern Sphere of Influence (SOI), Council reviewed information regarding fiscal considerations of annexation, an assessment of current infrastructure facilities, an overview of the annexation process, and directed staff to continue the study of the SOL Since the Study Session, staff has continued public outreach efforts and gave a presentation to the Vista Santa Rosa Community Council on May 29, 2024, on the City's recent studies of the SOL Staff also developed a survey to further engage the community and receive feedback from Vista Santa Rosa residents and property owners. The survey is available in English and Spanish versions. It was mailed on July 24, 2024 to all registered voters and property owners within the Southern SOI, with a return postage paid envelope. Online versions of the survey have also been prepared and can be accessed via a QR Code that takes you to a dedicated "Vista Santa Rosa" page available on the City's website. Staff will collect the feedback from the surveys and include a summary of the findings at a future SOI Study Session. Attachment: 1. Vista Santa Rosa SOI Surveys 1127 The Vista Santa Rosa Community area is in the City of La Quinta's Sphere of Influence, which is an area next to but outside of the La Quinta City boundaries. The City of La Quinta is evaluating possible annexation of this area. Please take a short survey so that we can learn what is important to you. For further information. please contact Scott Nespor, Senior Planner, at 760-777-7069 or snespor@laquintaca.gov. An online version of this survey can be found using this QR code: 3r English and Spanish versions of the survey have been provided. �. Return one completed survey per person by using the enclosed stamped envelope. 3� Please Mark Your Answer in the Box pace Provided ❑' �r �r 1. Please indicate your connection to Vista Santa Rosa (Check all that apply)? ❑ Resident ❑ Property Owner ❑ Business Operator in Vista Santa Rosa 2. Do you support Vista Santa Rosa becoming part of the City of La Quinta (Annexation)? ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral 3. Please describe why you do or do not support becoming part of the City of La Quinta? (Please Answer in the Space Below) HOW IMPORTANT TO YOU ARE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC SAFETY SERVICES? 4. Fire Protection/Public Safety/Emergency Response Time ❑ Important ❑ Somewhat Important ❑ Not Important S. Code Compliance Enforcement (ie response to complaints regarding noise, short term vacation ❑ Important rentals, construction without building permits, nuisances) ❑ Somewhat Important ❑ Not Important 6. Please provide any additional comments regarding public safety you would like to share. (Please Answer in the Space Below) WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING BUSINESSES IN VISTA SANTA ROSA? 7. Stores/Services such as Grocery Stores, Retail, and Restaurants ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral 8. Office, Medical Office, or Industrial Park ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral 9. Automotive Service and Repair Facilities ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral 10. Agricultural related businesses, such as farm stands, agritourism, Community Supported ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral Agriculture operations 11. Learning Centers, Trade Schools ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral 12. Small Event Centers/Ranchos ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral 13. Please provide any additional comments regarding businesses you would like to share. (Please Answer in the Space Below) WOULD YOU LIKE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING BE INCLUDED AS PROPERTY OWNERS DEVELOP THEIR PROPERTY IN VISTA SANTA ROSA? 14. Design Guidelines for Future Development (Le Vista Santa Rosa Design Guidelines) ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral 15. A Vista Santa Rosa Town Center ❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral 16. Preservation of Agricultural Lands ❑Yes ❑No ❑Neutral 17. Expansion of Equestrian Properties and Activities ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral 18. Please provide any additional comments regarding future development in Vista Santa (Please Answer in the Space Below) Rosa you would like to share. 1128 SHOULD ANY OF THE FOLLOWING HOUSING TYPES BE PROVIDED IN VISTA SANTA ROSA? 19. Agricultural Worker Housing ❑Yes ❑No ❑Neutral 20. Mobile Home or Modular Home Park ❑Yes ❑No ❑Neutral 21. Rental Housing ❑Yes ❑No ❑Neutral 22. Affordable Housing ❑Yes ❑No ❑Neutral 23. Market Rate Single Family Homes ❑Yes ❑No ❑Neutral 24.Short Term Vacation Rental Housing ❑Yes ❑No ❑Neutral 25. Please provide any additional comments regarding Housing in Vista Santa Rosa you (Please Answer in the Space Below) would like to share. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SEE ANY OF THE FOLLOWING RECREATION AMENITIES? 26. Equestrian/Multipurpose Trails 27. Recreation Opportunities, such as Pickleball, Sport Courts, and/or Skate Park 28. Parks and Open Space. 29. Please provide any additional comments regarding Recreation in Vista Santa Rosa you would like to share. ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral ❑Yes ❑ No ❑ Neutral (Please Answer in the Space Below) HOW IMPORTANT ARE THE FOLLOWING UTILITY AND INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS? 30. Electrical System Upgrades 31. Internet/Telecommunications Upgrades 32. Regular Schedule of Road Maintenance 33. Expansion of Public Water and/or Sewer System 34. Sidewalks and/or Bicycle Lanes 35. Please provide any additional comments regarding Utilities/Infrastructure in Vista Santa Rosa you would like to share. ❑ Important ❑ Somewhat Important ❑ Not Important ❑ Important ❑ Somewhat Important ❑ Not Important ❑ Important ❑ Somewhat Important ❑ Not Important ❑ Important ❑ Somewhat Important ❑ Not Important ❑ Important ❑ Somewhat Important ❑ Not Important (Please Answer in the Space Below) 1129 En espanol El area de la Comunidad Vista Santa Rosa se encuentra en la Esfera de Influencia de la Ciudad de La Quinta, que es un area al lado, pero fuera de los limites de la Ciudad de La Quinta. La Ciudad de La Quinta esta evaluando una posible anexion de esta zona. Realice una breve encuesta para que podamos saber que es importante para usted. Puede encontrar una version de esta encuesta en linea utilizando este codigo QR: p up Para mas information, por favor contactar Scott Nespor, Senior Planner, a 760-777-7069 o snespor@laquintaca.gov. �1� �' Le Hemos enviado la encuesta en ingles y espanol. Le Pedimos que solo regrese una encuesta por persona en el sobre estampado que le hemos enviado.�:, �4 Por favor marque su respuesta en el cuadro/espacio proporcionado 1. Por favor indique su conexion con Vista Sant Rosa (Marque todo to que corresponds). ❑ Residente ❑ Dueno de la propiedad ❑ Operador de negocios en Vista Santa Rosa 2. LApoya que Vista Santa Rosa forme parte de la Ciudad de La Quinta (Anexion)? ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 3. Por favor describa por que apoya o no ser parte de la Ciudad de La Quinta. (Por favor responda en el espacio a continuation) QUE IMPORTANCIA TIENEN PAPA LISTED LOS SIGUIENTES SERVICIOS DE SEGURIDAD PUBLICA? 4. Protection contra incendios/Seguridad p6blica/Tiempo de respuesta a emergencias ❑ Importante ❑ Un Poco Importante ❑ No Importante S. Aplicacion del codigo (es decir, respuesta a quejas sobre ruido, alquileres vacacionales a corto ❑ Importante plazo, construction sin permisos de construction, molestias) ❑ Un Poco Importante ❑ No Importante 6. Proporcione cualquier comentario adicional sobre la seguridad p6blica que desee compartir. (Por favor responda en el espacio a continuation) ALE GUSTARIA VIER ALGUNO DE LOS SIGUIENTES NEGOCIOS EN VISTA SANTA ROSA? 7. Tiendas/servicios como supermercados, tiendas y restaurantes ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 8. Oficina, Consultorio Medico o Parque Industrial ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 9. Instalaciones de reparation y servicio automotriz ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 10. Negocios relacionados con la agricultura, como puestos agricolas, agroturismo y ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral operaciones de agricultura apoyada por la comunidad 11. Centros de aprendizaje, escuelas vocacionales ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 12. Centros de eventos/ranchos ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 13. Proporcione cualquier comentario adicional sobre las empresas que le gustaria compartir. (Por favor responda en el espacio a continuation) ;LE GUSTARIA QUE SE INCLUYERA ALGUNO DE LOS SIGUIENTES A MEDIDA QUE LOS PROPIETARIOS DESARROLLEN SU PROPIEDAD EN VISTA SANTA ROSA? 14. Guias de diseno Para el desarrollo futuro (es decir, guias de diseno de Vista Santa Rosa) ❑Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 15. Creation de un centro de la ciudad de Vista Santa Rosa ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 16. Preservation de Tierras Agricolas ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 17. Expansion de propiedades y actividades ecuestres ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 18. Proporcione cualquier comentario adicional sobre el desarrollo futuro en Vista Santa Rosa (Por favor responda en el espacio a que le gustaria compartir. continuation) 1130 En espanol ;,SE DEBE PROPORCIONAR ALGUNO DE LOS SIGUIENTES TIPOS DE VIVIENDA EN VISTA SANTA ROSA? 19. Vivienda para trabajadores agr(colas El Si ❑No ❑Neutral 20. Parque de casas moviles o casas modulares El Si ❑No ❑Neutral 21. Viviendas de renta ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 22. Vivienda accessible de bajos ingresos El Si ❑No ❑Neutral 23. Viviendas unifamiliares a precio de mercado El Si ❑No ❑Neutral 24. Vivienda de renta vacacional a corto plazo El Si ❑No ❑Neutral 25. Por favor proporcione cualquier comentario adicional sobre Vivienda en Vista Santa (Por favor responda en el espacio a Rosa que le gustaria compartir. continuacion) j.LE GUSTARIA VER ALGUNA DE LAS SIGUIENTES COMODIDADES RECREATIVAS? 26. Senderos ecuestres/multiusos ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 27. Oportunidades de recreacion, como Pickleball, canchas deportivas y/o parque de patinaje ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 28. Parques y Espacios Abiertos ❑ Si ❑ No ❑ Neutral 29. Proporcione cualquier comentario adicional sobre la recreacion en Vista Santa Rosa que le (Por favor responda en el espacio a gustaria compartir. continuacion) L QUE IMPORTANCIA TIENEN LAS SIGUIENTES MEJORAS EN LOS SERVICIOS PUBLICOS Y LA INFRAESTRUCTURA? 30. Actualizaciones del sistema electrico 31. Actualizaciones de Internet/Telecomunicaciones 32. Calendario regular de mantenimiento de carreteras 33. Ampliacion del Sistema PUblico de Agua y/o Alcantarillado 34. Aceras y/o carriles para bicicletas 35. Proporcione cualquier comentario adicional sobre servicios publicos/infraestructura en Vista Santa Rosa que desee compartir. ❑ Importante ❑ Un Poco Importante ❑ No Importante ❑ Importante ❑ Un Poco Importante ❑ No Importante ❑ Importante ❑ Un Poco Importante ❑ No Importante ❑ Importante ❑ Un Poco Importante ❑ No Importante ❑ Importante ❑ Un Poco Importante ❑ No Importante (Por favor responda en el espacio a continuacion) 1131 1132 I V A M 01 612-1►1H1►IM]VAFG11r[•]u-10kIAu1.colasI r,A palmsprings INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING Agenda Item Executive Summary Airport Conference Room, Palm Springs International Airport 3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Wednesday, July 10, 2024 - 5:30 P.M. The following agenda items were distributed on the next regular business day after the Airport Commission agenda packet was distributed to the Airport Commission, and at least 24 hours prior to the Airport Commission meeting. AGENDA ITEM 9.113 — Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt Inc. ATTACHMENT: Revised Staff Report with Attachment A 1133 palm springs INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING AGENDA Airport Conference Room, Palm Springs International Airport 3400 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262 Wednesday, July 10, 2024 - 5:30 P.M. To view/listen/participate virtually in the meeting live, please contact Tanya Perez at Tanya.Perez()_palmspringsca.gov or the following telephone number (760) 318-3805 to register for the Zoom meeting. There will be an email with Zoom credentials sent after registration is complete, in order to access the meeting and offer public comment. Registration is not required to attend the meeting in person. In addition, the meeting will also be teleconferenced pursuant to Government Code Section 54953 from the following location(s): TELECONFERENCE LOCATION(S): Commissioner David Feltman — Palm Springs Commissioner Bryan Ebensteiner — Palm Springs 176 Bradford Street, #4 20375 Knightsbridge Road Provincetown, MA 02657 Shorewood, MN 55331 Commissioner Tracy Martin — Palm Springs Commissioner Keith Young -City of Rancho Mirage 2771 Ori Ave 6 Kai Ala Drive, Unit 2427 San Jose, CA 95128 Lahaina, HI 96761 Commissioner Ken Hedrick — Palm Springs 2345 Mill Road, #1215 Alexandria, VA 22314 Each location is accessible to the public, and members of the public may address the Airport Commission from any of the locations listed above. Any person who wishes to provide public testimony in public comments is requested to file a speaker card before the Public Comments portion of the meeting. You may submit your public comment to the Airport Commission electronically. Material may be emailed to: Tanya. Perez(@Palmspringsca.gov - Transmittal prior to the start of the meeting is required. Any correspondence received during or after the meeting will be distributed to the Airport Commission and retained for the official record. To view Airport Commission meeting videos click on YouTube. 1134 Airport Commission Special Meeting Agenda July 10, 2024 — Page 2 City of Palm Springs: Riverside County: City of Cathedral City: City of Palm Desert: Kevn J. Corcoran Margaret Park Vacant Kevin Wiseman —Vice Chair David Feltman Dave Banks J Craig Fong City of Indian Wells: Robert Berriman City of Coachella: Denise Delgado City of Rancho Mirage: Keith Young Todd Burke Ken Hedrick Daniel Caldwell I Tracy Martin City of La Quinta: Vacant City of Desert Hot Springs: City of Indio: Rick Wise Bryan Ebensteiner Samantha McDermott Jan Pye Palm Springs City Staff Scott C. Stiles Harry Barrett Jr., A.A.E. Jeremy Keating City Manager Airport Executive Director Assistant Airport Director 1. CALL TO ORDER — PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. POSTING OF AGENDA 3. ROLL CALL 4. NOMINATION AND ELECTION OF OFFICERS 5. ACCEPTANCE OF AGENDA 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Limited to three minutes on any subject within the purview of the Commission 7. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Minutes of the Airport Commission Regular Meeting of February 21, 2024 8. INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS: 8.A Commissioner Bryan Ebensteiner 8.13 Commissioner Ken Hedrick 8.0 Commissioner Samantha McDermott 8.11) Commissioner Representing Cathedral City 8.E Commissioner Representing La Quinta 8.F Executive Administrative Assistant Andrew LeCompte 9. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: 9.A Palm Springs Air Museum Lease Extension 9.13 Amendment No. 2 to Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt Inc. 9.0 Public Relations & Legislative Plan for Airport Master Plan 9.11) Taxiway Rehabilitation Project 9.E Outbound Baggage Handling System Update 9.F Marketing and Air Service Update 9.G Measure J Update 9.11­11 Parking Rate Analysis 9.1 Turo Update 1135 Airport Commission Special Meeting Agenda July 10, 2024 — Page 3 9.J Financial Summary Update 9.K Noise Committee Update. 9.11- Concessions Update 9.M Smoking Ordinance Update 9.N Projects and Airport Capital Improvement Program Update 10. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT 11. COMMISSIONERS REQUESTS AND REPORTS 12. REPORT OF COUNCIL ACTIONS: 12.A Past City Council Actions 123 Future City Council Actions 13. RECEIVE AND FILE 14. COMMITTEES: 14.A Future Committee Meetings 14.113 Committee's Roster ADJOURNMENT: The Airport Commission will adjourn to a Regular Meeting on September 18, 2024, at 5:30 P.M. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING I, Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director, City of Palm Springs, California, hereby certify this agenda was posted on July 3, 2024, in accordance with established policies and procedures. PUBLIC NOTICES Pursuant to G.C. Section 54957.5(b)(2) the designated office for inspection of records in connection with the meeting is the Office of the City Clerk, City Hall, 3200 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way. Complete Agenda Packets are available for public inspection at: City Hall Office of the City Clerk. Agenda and staff reports are available on the City's website www.palmspringsca.gov. If you would like additional information on any item appearing on this agenda, please contact the Office of the City Clerk at (760) 323-8204. It is the intention of the City of Palm Springs to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) in all respects. If, as an attendee or a participant at this meeting, or in meetings on a regular basis, you will need special assistance beyond what is normally provided, the City will attempt to accommodate you in every reasonable manner. Please contact the Department of Aviation, (760) 318-3800, at least 48 hours prior to the meeting to inform us of your particular needs and to determine if accommodation is feasible. 1136 Palm Springs Airport Commission Report — July 10, 2024 Meeting Discussion and Action Items: Palm Springs Air Museum Lease Extension — Museum Director Fred Bell gave a presentation on the Air Museum and the need for a 10-year extension of the current lease which is set to expire in November, 2035. This extension will support a $3.5 million expansion and remodel of the museum's front entry area, adding 4,000 square feet of new floor space and making significant improvements. The estimated annual economic impact of the Museum to our region is approximately $35 million. The Commission recommended to Council to approve the extension with various CPI adjustments on the rent and fees owed to the City. Agreement Amendment with Mead & Hunt Inc for Professional Consulting Services for the Comprehensive Airport Master Plan —The amendment would extend the agreement through July, 2026. This will help assist with various parking and facilities configuration issues, options and impacts. Council is still debating the location and composition of the new rental car facility. Two locations being considered for the Consolidated Rental Car Facility (CONRAQ (1) Near the main terminal (including the space where the USO and Pond hangar are now), requiring one or two floors to be constructed underground; or (2) On the south portion of the airport property, using shuttles (and possibly underground tunnels) to transport passengers and staff to and from the main facility. Parking Rate Analysis — A study was presented comparing the Palm Springs Airport parking rate structure to competing airports in Southern California. The current daily rate of $20 was implemented in 2018. The study indicated an inflation -based adjustment would be $26 per day, and recommended a $24 daily rate. After a lengthy discussion, the Commission approved a recommendation to the Council for the City to increase the daily rate to $26 per day. The Finance Manager indicated she planned to begin having the rate study updating every two years, followed by bringing rate recommendations to the Council. I suggested that even though they plan to update the study every two years, it would be better to take an inflation -based rate recommendation in the first year, thus avoiding further spikes in rate increases. This idea was well received. If the $26 rate is approved by Council, then it is projected to bring in an additional $1.5 million annually. Outbound Baggage Handling System Update — The new design is expected to be completed in August for presentation to the TSA for their comment period. Getting power from the Cogen plant across the street on the City Hall site to the airport is part of this consideration. The project is being sized to handle the expected growth in airport activity over the next 15 years. A temporary facility is expected to be needed for around nine months. Measure J (1% tax) and Measure D (1/2% tax) Sales Tax Update — In 2015, the FAA issued a regulation requiring that sales taxes generated from special sales taxes on airline fuel sales be set aside for airport specific expenditures. In 2017, the City's planned process for identifying and segregating these revenues was implemented by the City's Finance Department. The current Director of Finance & Treasurer reported that he had just recently come to understand this process which is generating about $750,000 annually, and has generated over $4 million since 2017. Executive Director Harry Barrett, Jr. was unable to attend the meeting, so a few discussion items were not presented or were just briefly mentioned. 1137 Next Commission Meeting: an all -day special meeting and study session on September 12, 2024, from 9 AM to 5 PM. The Commission will be dark in August. Note: On July 11, 2024, 1 attended a two-hour meeting on Open Meetings Law and the Brown Act for new and existing City of Palm Springs Commissioners as required by State Law. It was presented by City Attorney Jeff Ballinger, and attended by the City Clerk and staff, and introductory remarks were made by Mayor Jeffrey Bernstein and City Manager Scott Stiles. Also, I will be meeting with Harry Barrett on August 6t" at the airport at 2 PM to help bring me up to speed on various issues. 1138 springspalm INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT COMMISSION MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE AIRPORT COMMISSION OF THE PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Wednesday, February 21, 2024 — 5:30 P.M. 1. CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Dada called the Airport Commission meeting to order at 5:30 P.M. The meeting was held in -person and via videoconference. Chairman Dada led the Pledge of Allegiance. 2. POSTING OF THE AGENDA: Posted on February 15, 2024. 3. ROLL CALL: Commissioners Present: Dave Banks (Palm Springs)* J Craig Fong (Palm Springs) Todd Burke Palm Springs) Tracy Martin Palm Springs) Daniel Caldwell (Palm Springs) Tony Michaelis (Cathedral City Kevin Corcoran Palm Springs) - Vice Chair Jan P e Desert Hot Springs) Aftab Dada (Palm Springs) - Chair Rick Wise (Indio) Denise Delgado (Coachella) * Keith Young (Rancho Mirage) David Feltman Palm Springs) Commissioners Absent: Robert Berriman (Indian Wells), Kathleen Hughes (La Quinta), Margaret Park (Riverside County), M. Guillermo Suero (Palm Springs), and Kevin Wiseman (Palm Desert) * Dave Banks (Palm Springs) joined the meeting at 5:31 p.m. Denise Delgado (Coachella) joined the meeting at 5:46 p.m. Staff Present: Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director Jeremy Keating, Assistant Airport Director Daniel Meier, Deputy Director of Aviation, Marketing and Air Service Victoria Carpenter, Airport Administration Manager Geremy Holm, City Attorney Christina Brown, Executive Program Administrator Paula Pak, Executive Administrative Assistant Page 1 of 15 1139 Item 7 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 Others Present: Neil McLean, Gensler Matt Townsend, Frasca & Associates, LLC Ken Cushine, Frasca & Associates, LLC 4. ACCEPTANCE OF THE AGENDA: ACTION: Accept the Agenda as presented. Moved by Commissioner Dada, seconded by Commissioner Corcoran, and unanimously approved noting the absence of Commissioners Berriman, Delgado, Hughes, Park, Suero, and Wiseman. 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Brad Anderson expressed concerns regarding increased traffic and its impact on local air quality. He acknowledged the need to strike a balance between providing airport benefits to residents and the impacts of increased pollution, including those caused by other modes of transportation. He requested the Commission address the noise impacts associated with the Airport and that he would submit written comments accordingly. Executive Program Administrator Brown stated that Stewart Gandolf and John Wilhelmi were present via teleconference, and she informed Mr. Gandolf and Wilhelmi that public comment would be opened for Item 8.J. at the appropriate juncture of the meeting. Mr. Wilhelmi requested permission to provide public comment on Item 8.J. at this juncture due to a personal conflict later in the evening. The Commission allowed Mr. Wilhelmi to provide comment on Item 8.J. at this juncture. The detail of his comments are referenced under Item 8.J. in this document. 6. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES: ACTION: Approve the minutes of the Airport Commission Meeting of October 18, 2023. Moved by Commissioner Fong, seconded by Vice Chairman Corcoran, and unanimously approved noting the absence of Commissioners Berriman, Delgado, Hughes, Park, Suero, and Wiseman. 7. INTRODUCTIONS AND PRESENTATIONS: 7.A Executive Administrative Assistant Paula Pak Chairman Dada introduced the Airport's new Executive Administrative Assistant Paula Pak. Ms. Pak said that she had previously worked as a legal assistant and in hospitality. Airport Executive Director Barrett said that Ms. Pak would be serving as Page 2 of 15 1140 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 his assistant, and she would be overseeing the Airport Commission and Committee meetings and matters. 8. DISCUSSION AND ACTION ITEMS: 8.A Budget and Finance Committee Update Budget and Finance Committee Chairman Martin provided an update from the Budget and Finance Committee. He said that staff had presented several Baggage Handling System options, and the Committee had requested that staff gather and present additional information to provide to the Committee for a formal vote to be made by the Committee. The Committee also received a presentation concerning the Financial Consultant Agreement with Frasca & Associates, LLC, which appears on this agenda, and they approved a recommendation to approve the agreement. He said that there were material changes in both revenues and expenses and that the details would be provided by Airport Administration Manager Carpenter during the presentation of that item. 8.13 Financial Consultant Agreement with Frasca & Associates, LLC. Airport Administration Manager Carpenter reported that the item before the Commission was to review and consider a recommendation to the City Council to approve a contract service agreement with Frasca & Associates, LLC, in the amount of $3.5 million over a five-year term. Four proposals were received via a request for proposals process. The evaluation team included Airport staff, Finance Department staff, and finance staff from San Diego and Long Beach Airports. The proposals were evaluated and scored based upon publicly noticed criteria, and the team had determined that Frasca & Associates, LLC had the most highly qualified proposal. Matt Townsend and Ken Cushine, representing Frasca & Associates, LLC, were in attendance and Mr. Townsend provided a brief overview of the company. Mr. Townsend continued by reporting their initial projects with the Airport would consist of continued implementation of the Airline Use and Lease Agreement (AULA), including calculation of mid -year rates and charges based upon mid -year estimates of revenues, expenses, and activity. Over the next 60 days, their projects would include a cash liquidity forecast and working through a planned capital program for the remainder of the fiscal year. Additionally, they would assist with Fiscal Year 2025 budgeted rates and charges calculations, extension of rental car concession agreement, planning for a successor agreement as related to rental car companies, an amendment to the PFC applications, planning and strategy for the new PFC application in support of the terminal expansion projects, and longer -term capital program financial planning including anticipated bond financing. Long term work would include implementation of the Airport's Master Plan expansion projects, developing strategies for revenue bond financings, and negotiating the successor AULA. He expressed their team's excitement in partnering with the Airport. Page 3 of 15 1141 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 ACTION: Motion to recommend to the City Council the approval of an agreement with Frasca & Associates, LLC. Moved by Commissioner Feltman, seconded by Commissioner Burke, and unanimously approved noting the absence of Commissioners Berriman, Hughes, Park, Suero and Wiseman. 8.0 Financial Summary Update Airport Administration Manager Carpenter reported on her work with Commissioner Martin concerning various modifications to the financial reports, and she thanked him for his support and guidance. Ms. Carpenter noted that a suggestion from Commissioner Martin was to implement a provision of an ongoing update to the Commission concerning the various revenue and expenditures in each fund account, including the respective purpose of each fund. She opened the floor to Commission comments concerning the financial summary update ending January 31, 2024. 8.D Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee Update Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee Chairman Feltman reported on the recent Committee meeting including the receipt of feedback on items related to the baggage claim area, an update on data on parking facility utilization during the holidays, and his perception was that the Airport staff had handled it well. Vice Chairman Corcoran inquired whether the data provided had answered the Commission's question concerning utilization numbers for the closest parking and the length of the average stay in the parking lots. Airport Administration Manager Carpenter noted that the information would be covered during Item 8.K. Commissioner Feltman reported on Assistant Airport Director Keating's presentation on the implementation of the improved Wi-Fi capacity, including commencement with the two terminals, feedback concerning inadequate Wi-Fi at the Airport, and the important upgrades that were due to facilitate Wi-Fi availability. 8.E Baggage Claim Expansion Update Airport Executive Director Barrett reported that the Commission would not be voting on this item during this meeting in light of new information received from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), although the initial plan was to have both the Operations, Properties and Facilities and Finance and Budget Committees conduct further review and make a recommendation to the full Commission for consideration. Mr. Barrett said that he would provide additional information after the update presentation. Neil McLean, representing Gensler, provided an update on the various concepts forwarded for the Baggage Claim Project. A presentation was provided that detailed the need to address congestion at the baggage claim operation due to the baggage claim being undersized, the proposed plan to expand the building pursuant to the Page 4 of 15 1142 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 Master Plan, the proposed high -capacity carousel devices and other planned improvements, including increases to the square footage in the respective areas. Mr. McLean detailed the rendering of the expansion of the existing building, without alteration, to fit with the existing architecture. Alternate A was presented, including the analysis to establish the length necessary to meet projected bag demand, carousel device sizes, removal of the rental car operation from the designated space, and expansion to address congestion. Temporary relocation of the rental car operation outside of the building would be necessary until the contract work is completed. Additionally, a temporary bag claim would be required due to a necessary invasive seismic upgrade to the building structure and detailed illustrations were displayed. Two single occupant restrooms would be available, upgrades to the mechanical system would be completed, and a new mechanical room and bag services offices would be constructed. The cost for Alternative A would be approximately $41 million, inclusive of the items detailed in the presentation. Mr. McLean presented Alternate B, which was designed to accommodate all of the current functions currently needed in the space and to meet passenger activity. This would necessitate expanding the building into a larger area, to include two bays on the airside and two bays further into the rental car lot and the four slope plate carousel devices would fit. Additionally, the difference from Alternate A is that the rental car operation would remain in the bag claim hall, and Alternate B would include the structure replacement as described for Alternate A and the temporary bag claim and rental car operation during construction. Mr. McLean said that it is more efficient to place those functions inside one temporary building, rather than trailers or a temporary structure, and the two single occupant restrooms and bag service offices would be included. He said that although the proposal would exceed the 10,000 square foot original plan, it would meet demand needs. Mr. McLean noted that Alternate C was a much simpler option and that it was conceived prior to the preferred option for the Master Plan, and consideration was given to the minimal amount necessary to add to the building if eventually all functions would be moved to a new facility at the south end. With this option, the two devices would be in a new addition, and they would renovate the remainder of the bag claim hall. Mr. McLean said that this option would not address any replacement of the structural upgrade to the building as in the other alternatives presented, nor any other building upgrade, and the two areas would be knit together for a temporary operation. Mr. McLean reviewed the temporary operation for when the rental car operations are moved outside of the building, which would displace parking spots from the current rental car lot. Airport Executive Director Barrett reiterated that the original plan was to present the project to the Finance and Budget and Operations, Properties and Facilities Committees to receive feedback and to entertain a vote for a recommendation to the Commission and then to present the project to the full Commission. Shortly after staff had met with the Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee, staff had heard Page 5 of 15 1143 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 from the FAA on two points of information. The first was regarding the $5.7 million ATP grant that the FAA had announced last year in March, which was only valid for a period of one year, not four years, and staff had had an issue with the environmental process delaying the project, as the building is on the National Historical Register, which requires additional scrutiny. As a result, the FAA determined that the $5.7 million grant had not been used within the allowed timeframe, and the FAA reallocated the grant funds to another airport. Mr. Barrett said that he didn't believe that the reallocation of the grant funds would impact the project, and he said that staff was working through the process with the appropriate agencies. Airport Executive Director Barrett said that the second point of information was in regard to the timing of the Airport's projects relative to environmental processes and that the FAA had a concern in regard to the Baggage Claim Project currently being in the environmental process and the process impacting subsequent projects such as a potential North Concourse expansion or Consolidated Rental Car Facility (CONRAC). Mr. Barrett said that staff has been working with their consultants to get additional information and that the FAA would be the determinant factor, noting that if the Airport commences this project, they are committed and may not be able to complete the other projects within five years due to the required environmental review process. He said that staff does not believe that the FAA's initial interpretation is completely accurate and staff was working with the FAA to gain additional information and clarification. Mr. Barrett said that Baggage Claim Project was currently on pause while staff works on figuring out how to proceed. Commissioner Delgado inquired as to the current length of the environmental process for the project. Mr. Barrett responded it had been about a year. Commissioner Delgado inquired about the length of time that staff had anticipated that the environmental process would take. Mr. Barrett said that staff had anticipated that the environmental process would be finished in six months. Commissioner Delgado inquired about how much longer staff was anticipating for the environmental process to be finished. Mr. Barrett said that the date of completion was unknown. Commissioner Delgado expressed concern regarding the reassignment of the ATP funds, and she inquired as to the length of the original application process. Mr. Barrett responded it took approximately one month to complete the four grant applications and submission, and then a few extra months for the decision. Commissioner Delgado acknowledged staff's efforts to keep the $5.7 million grant and to inform the FAA of the additional environmental process requirements due to the historic nature of the building, she expressed concern regarding the FAA not being more considerate of the situation, and she inquired whether staff confirmed the ability to reapply for the grant funds. Mr. Barrett responded that the FAA suggested the Airport could reapply, the Airport staff reapplied for a grant, and the Airport did not receive funds for this year. He said that staff would reapply for next year's competitive process cycle, which involves applications from airports across the nation. Page 6 of 15 1144 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 Commissioner Delgado inquired as to whether the main difference between Alternatives A and B is the additional 9,000 square feet, adding $5 million to the project. Mr. McLean responded that Alternative B would include 8,400 more square feet than Alternative A, doubling the space. Commissioner Delgado stated that Alternative A would condense all the features and save $5 million, and to add 9,000 square feet and to keep the rental car facilities in the building, it would add $5 million under Alternative B. Assistant Airport Director Keating noted that the temporary baggage claim has to be built in either option. Commissioner Martin questioned if having the baggage claim and the rental car facilities in the same building was the right long-term solution as opposed to putting in the CONRAC, and he said that he believed that the Commission needed more guidance on Alternatives A and B. Mr. Barrett expressed support for Alternative B's opportunity to build and to get as much space as possible, and even though there are plans to build a CONRAC, Alternative B would provide the Airport the space it needs to work with over the long term. Commissioner Feltman asked if the car rental companies had a preference in regard to keeping the car rental facilities at the baggage claim area or moving the facilities to the CONRAC. Mr. Barrett said that from a customer experience perspective, there is a preference for having service desks in the baggage claim area, and he noted that the car rental companies had not seen the alternatives that were being presented at the meeting. Commissioner Banks inquired about the length of time that the temporary facilities would need to be utilized. Mr. Barrett responded that it would come down to the planning and phasing of the project, and he estimated that construction could take approximately 18 to 24 months. Commissioner Burke inquired whether Alternative A or B was more customer -friendly. Mr. McLean responded that Alternative B was slightly more customer friendly because Alternative B has the flexibility to orient the rental car on the left and the bag claim towards the back of the temporary facility. In Alternative A, passengers do have to travel along the front of the building and come back into the building, since bag claim is separated from the rental car operation. Alternative B provides access to necessary space in a timely manner and is more comprehensive in service access. Commissioner Young inquired whether Alternative B would accommodate the necessary baggage and traffic flow without a structural expansion or would an expansion be required in Passenger Activity Level (PAL) 3 or 4. Mr. McLean said that in regard to PAL 3, there was not a call for an increase in the space itself, and PAL 4 would need quite a bit more space and it would be a part of the larger Master Plan expansion of the concourse. Commissioner Feltman inquired as to the current total square footage. Mr. McLean responded that the total existing current bag claim area is 20,418 square feet. Page 7 of 15 1145 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 Commissioner Feltman inquired about the temporary buildings in Alternative A being about 5,300 square feet, and Mr. McLean stated they were trying to get closer to the 10,000 square feet of space. Commissioner Feltman noted that in consideration of everything needed for the completion of the project, the project could take up to 48- months. He expressed concern about the amount of space needed to ensure a positive customer experience over the potentially 48-month long process, and the potential negative impacts to customers, particularly as related to weather and the impacts on senior citizens. He also inquired about how to facilitate the passage of customers at the temporary baggage claim area to their transportation mode for up to three or four years. Vice Chairman Corcoran referred to the loss of FAA funds, and he asked if the project would now be part of the long range plan discussions related to Phase 1 of the Master Plan Alternative 1A, and if the Commission would be looking at all three of the projects together. Mr. Barrett responded it would be unlikely as it would take longer to get the environmental clearances and to design the expansion, and he said that there was a critical need now with the Baggage Claim Project. Mr. Barrett said that it would be staff's preference to move forward with expanding the baggage claim and then deal with the remainder of the items at another time. Vice Chairman Corcoran inquired if moving forward on the project could place Phase 1 of the Master Plan on the back burner. Mr. Barrett responded that it could postpone Phase 1 of the Master Plan based on the conversations that staff has had with the FAA, and additional conversations were needed, as staff believes that the FAA may be interpreting the Airports proposed projects a little differently than they are intended to be. Commissioner Caldwell stated that the Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee had reviewed Alternatives A, B, and C and that the Committee had determined that Alternative B was the better option based on staff's input, with less impact on customers. M. Barrett stated that the next steps were for staff to meet with the FAA on the following day where staff would be posing their questions and the FAA would need time to provide their responses, which could take a few weeks. He said that staff wanted to keep Mr. McLean on track with the project and that they would provide him with any additional information as it obtained, and staff was hoping to bring the item back for a vote in the near future. Airport Executive Director Barrett provided detail on the bipartisan infrastructure law, which included two mechanisms for funding, one being the ATP grant that was lost, the other one was an entitlement or allotment over five years. There is already money in place for a large chunk of this project. The only item pending is the environmental clearance. Commissioner Delgado asked if the understanding was that the Airport was seeking clarification from the FAA to see if the project can be moved forward for an action item with the hope that the FAA is not waiting on the Airport to complete the environmental Page 8 of 15 1146 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 process which has an uncertain completion date. Mr. Barrett explained that with the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law there were two mechanisms for funding, one being the ATP grant which had been lost, and the other being an entitlement or allotment over five years, and he said that the Airport has funds in place to fund a significant portion of the project and that staff was waiting on the environmental clearance. Commissioner Delgado referred to the project being a multi -phase project, and she asked if the Airport doesn't get an ATP grant, how successful would the Airport be in getting to all of the phases of the project. Mr. Barrett responded that expedient progress would be made once the environmental process is completed and the project is designed. He said that it remains to be determined whether the grant application will be successful as compared to those of other airports and the potential impacts of other longer -term planned projects. Commissioner Delgado expressed a preference for Alternative B only as it doubles the space, and long-term planning would be dependent upon the additional $5 million and whether it can be obtained. 8.F PSP Stay and Play Visitor Program 8.G Marketing Update Items 8F. and 8.G. were heard concurrently. Deputy Director of Aviation, Marketing and Air Service Meier provided a combined update report on the PSP Stay and Play Visitor Program and the January 2024 Marketing and Air Service Update. He said that Avelo was extending their service to Sonoma County for the whole summer, which would increase the Airport's nonstop summer destinations to 13. Various corrections were noted for the March through July passenger data. Mr. Meier announced that the Stay and Play Program had launched on Monday of last week and the program was going well. He noted that various news program had misreported that the Stay and Play passes were being issued during the Airports peak hours of the day, and he said that staff ensures that ticketed passengers always have priority over the Stay and Play pass holders, and the Stay and Play pass holders are not allowed to use the TSA PreCheck line and they cannot bring in any luggage. Mr. Meier noted that in the last 12 months, approximately five airports had added this program to their services. Commissioner Wise commented on the negative information provided in a recent news program concerning parking. Mr. Meier provided information on the Airport's efforts to reach out to the news program to correct the information that was incorrectly provided. Commissioner Feltman inquired as to the purpose of the program. Mr. Meier stated that the purpose of the program is to allow the community the opportunity to dine, shop, and enjoy a positive experience at the Airport. Page 9 of 15 1147 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 8.H Ad Hoc Design Review Committee Update 8.1 Concessions Update Item 8.H. and 8.1 were heard concurrently. Assistant Airport Director Keating reported that updates had been made to the concessions deployment schedule. He said that Nine Cities Craft would be opening in mid -March and several of the retail stores were in the final phases and were expected to be completed by the end of May, and he said that the primary focus was not to close everything at the same time. Construction was heavily underway on various concessions and there were some structural issues at the Agua Caliente Concourse which were not expected and were being addressed. Ad Hoc Design Review Committee Chairman Corcoran reported that the Ad Hoc Design Review Committee had engaged in a significant discussion concerning passenger impacts as related to long lines and difficulty finding coffee and other items at the Airport and the information was shared with Paradies. He noted that it was understood that it would be a bit of a struggle until Nine Cities Craft opens and that Paradies was making an effort to open up and offer coffee in multiple locations, including the deployment of a mobile coffee cart. Commissioner Burke noted that directional signage would also be deployed to help get customers to the concessions and items they desire. Ad Hoc Design Review Committee Chairman Corcoran reported that Paradies would be adding additional space to The Pink Door by using the space that had previously been a Starbucks, and Paradies would be providing greater service, greater offerings, and more space in the pre -security area. He said that there was additional discussion about the quality of food offerings planned and the Committee would be reviewing the proposed menus again to ensure that they include healthy offerings. Commissioner Feltman noted that there was also a discussion about the vending machines. Ad Hoc Design Review Committee Chairman Corcoran said that Paradies had proposed to relocate the four vending machines that are currently located in front of The Pink Door Location across the way and in front of the windows, and the Committee directed staff to relocate the vending machines to a pre -security location that would not be covering any windows. 8.J Car Rental Car Wash Facility Noise Assistant Airport Director Keating reported on the history of the car rental car wash facility noise issue. He said that the residents of the Sunmor community contacted staff concerning noise emanating from the Enterprise Rent-A-Car (Enterprise) location. Staff met with the residents and personally observed the noise, which appeared to be coming from the car wash blowers. Staff then met with Enterprise Page 10 of 15 1148 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 representatives who said that they were willing to be a good community partner and that they would see what they could do to mitigate the noise. Staff asked the City's Code Enforcement to evaluate the decibels of noise that were coming from the Enterprise car wash facility, and Code Enforcement determined that Enterprise was out of compliance with the City's noise code. As a result of discussions with Enterprise and the Sunmor residents, a sound barrier wall was installed, after which it was determined that Enterprise was in compliance with the City's noise code. The residents notified staff that they were not satisfied with the noise mitigation, and staff is continuing to work on potential solutions, including adding additional sound wall construction and noise testing. Assistant Airport Director Keating reported that a proposed solution would be to keep the Enterprise blowers on continuously during certain hours, as turning them off and on increase the noise impacts. He said that staff would continue to work with Enterprise and the impacted residents, and it was acknowledged that Enterprise was operating in good faith as related to this issue and the subject blowers were installed for efficiency. Vice Chairman Corcoran said that he went with staff to listen to the noise from the blowers and that there was a high-pitched noise that happens when the blowers come on, and he said that if the blowers were to run all day, there would only be white noise coming from the blowers. He acknowledged the ongoing impacts on the adjacent neighbors and that all parties were working toward solutions. Commissioner Burke inquired if Enterprise had reached out to the manufacturer of the blowers to see if any additional mitigation measures could be deployed. Mr. Keating responded that he did not know if Enterprise had spoken to the manufacturer, however, adding dampeners was discussed as a mitigation measure, among other potential solutions. Commissioner Delgado inquired as to how many homes were being impacted by the noise. Mr. Keating responded that he had originally met with three homeowners and that he was currently in contact with one resident who seemed to be representing the other homeowners. Commissioner Delgado inquired if the other residents were consulted as to their experience with the sound wall. Mr. Keating responded that he did not have the contact information for the other residents, and he reiterated that Enterprise is now in compliance with the City's noise code. Commissioner Banks inquired whether blowers could present a similar problem at the other car rental car wash facilities. Airport Executive Director Barrett responded the other two car rental companies have blowers in place and that Enterprise's blower had become non -operational pre -pandemic and they didn't want to invest in a new blower because they were under the impression that they would be moving to the CONRAC. Being that the CONRAC is still years away from being built, Enterprise decided to invest new blowers to make their operations efficient. Page 11 of 15 1149 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 Mr. Wilhelmi's comments were provided during Item No. 5 and are referenced below. John Wilhelmi stated he provided comment at last month's Noise Committee meeting concerning the excess noise coming from the Enterprise Rent-a-Car's vehicle washing operations, and he said that he was grateful to see that the Commission had included this issue on the agenda. Mr. Wilhelmi explained that his residence is adjacent to the Airport and he noted that he has not previously had cause to complain concerning any noise or other issue. In September 2023, he reported a new, loud, intermittent whistling noise emanating from the car wash operation, which had been modified, and the noise occurs hundreds of times per day, on weekdays, weekends and holidays, and it can be heard at more than 20 homes in the adjacent Sunmor neighborhood. Mr. Wilhelmi expressed further concern that the noise is extraordinary for car wash operations and should be prohibited adjacent to a residential neighborhood. He suggested that the Commissioners should visit his residence to evaluate the noise and that he had provided his contact information in his public comment submission. Second, he requested the Commission urge, in the strongest possible terms, some type of immediate follow up action and to allow the community to weigh in on proposals, as well as have independent oversight over the car wash operation. Third, he said that he would be willing to hire an independent noise consultant at his own expense to provide actionable, reasonable, and effective advice, if he knew the advice would be heeded. He appealed to the Commission's independent authority and expressed gratitude for being allowed to speak out of agenda order. Stuart Gandolf stated that he owns the property two houses down on 2980 East Plaimor Ave, and he has heard the blower noises as well. He said that he would visit the property tomorrow to observe the mitigation measures to determine whether there is improvement in noise reduction. He said that he supported the suggestion for Enterprise to contact the manufacturer, and he noted there were other noise impacts from Enterprise, however, this was the main priority. He said that he would provide further feedback after he visited his property. Brett Connor lives in the Sunmor neighborhood, he acknowledged he was one of the residents who met with Mr. Keating in September, he said that the noise has continued even with the sound wall, and he is unable to entertain in his own backyard. He stated that there were many residents impacted by the noise and who are concerned about impacts to their home values. Vice Chairman Corcoran concluded that staff would continue working on this matter and provide updates to the Commission accordingly. 8.K Long -Term Vehicle Parking Data Airport Administration Manager Carpenter reported that at the last Commission meeting, Vice Chairman Corcoran had inquired about the duration of vehicles that are staying within a five-day period. ABM Parking Management (ABM) was consulted and Page 12 of 15 1150 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 the comparison results from calendar year 2022 through calendar year 2023 indicated that 52% of the parking sales were within the one hour or less period. 20% of the parking sales were within the one hour and 20 minutes to a day period, and then two to five days was at 21 %. Anything over five days is a smaller percentage, which is within the 1 % to 3% range. Vice Chairman Corcoran inquired about staff conclusion about long-term parking. Ms. Carpenter said that people were not camping out in the parking lots and that the majority of the parking sales were from the hourly to daily parking sales. Vice Chairman Corcoran asked if staff felt that there was a parking issue, and he referenced the complaint that had been made by residents who had had difficulty finding parking spaces during the holidays. Ms. Carpenter responded that staff did not feel that parking was an issue, and she noted that during high demand times, the overflow parking lot is opened, and ABM is there to help with the shuttle. Airport Executive Director Barrett noted that there is the flexibility to address excess capacity needs during the entire year and the ability to increase communication with passengers. Commissioner Feltman inquired if rate increases would be considered. Mr. Barrett responded that this year's rates and fees analysis has not yet been completed, and there is hesitation to increase the daily rate, as it is a competitive advantage. Commissioner Wise suggested that more people would be willing to park in the overflow parking lot, if it were half price which would open more parking space in the other parking lots. Mr. Barrett said that he agreed with Commissioner Wise and that the matter was being considered in the long-term plan and that it will take several iterations of planning to get there. 81 Wi-Fi Update Assistant Airport Director Keating noted that Commissioner Feltman had provided a Wi-Fi update earlier in the meeting and that the project was imminent, with a cabling provider being onboarded within the next two or three weeks, with installation of new controllers and wireless access points shortly thereafter. 8.M Projects and Airport Capital Improvement Program Update 9. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REPORT: Item Nos. 8.M. and 9 were heard concurrently. Airport Executive Director Barrett reported that the City Manager, Assistant City Manager, and the City Engineer met with Congressman Calvert's office to discuss the loss of the grant funds for the Baggage Claim Project and to also discuss potential avenues for additional funds for various projects around the Airport. Congressman Calvert was very receptive to the situation. Page 13 of 15 1151 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 Mr. Barrett noted that he would be providing quarterly updates on the development of the Strategic Business Plan, and he said that staff had met with InterVISTAS who leading the Strategic Business Plan Project and they had were provided the scope of work, which was approved a few days prior. He said that in the coming two months, the Commission should be receiving the first draft to include stakeholder engagement, and staff would be reaching out to individual Commissioners to talk about ideas and strategies. Additionally, he reported on future meetings to engage the community on noise issues related to upcoming development, and provide an educational forum to ensure the community remains informed on the process and how noise and airspace works. 10. COMMISSIONERS REQUESTS AND REPORTS: Commissioner Martin inquired as to the status of the mid -year financial update. Staff noted it would be placed on the next agenda. Vice Chairman Corcoran requested an update at the next meeting on the legal status of the outbound baggage handling system matter. Airport Executive Director Barrett added to the previous update report that a Commissioner had requested that staff revisit the Uber and Lyft signage that is curbside, and he said that City Attorney Geremy Holm had provided the draft ordinance which would be moving forward. Commissioner Caldwell requested a brief update on the Measure J funds. Executive Program Administrator Brown noted that the projects that would be funded by Measure J would be presented at the February 29t" City Council meeting for approval. 11. REPORT OF CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS: 11.A. Past City Council Actions 11.B. Future City Council Actions 12. RECEIVE AND FILE: 12.A Airlines Activity Report January 2024 12.13 Airline Activity Report Fiscal Year Comparison 13. COMMITTEES: 13.A Future Committee Meetings 13.13 Committees and Airport Master Plan Working Group Rosters Page 14 of 15 1152 Airport Commission Minutes February 21, 2024 ADJOURNMENT: The Airport Commission adjourned at 7:22 P.M. to a Regular Meeting on March 20, 2024, at 5:30 P.M. Christina Brown Executive Program Administrator Page 15 of 15 1153 palm springs INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: July 10, 2024 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 9 TO LEASE AGREEMENT NO. A3613 WITH PALM SPRINGS AIR MUSEUM, INC. AT THE PALMS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT FROM: Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director SUMMARY: This action will approve Amendment No. 9 to the Lease Agreement No. A3613 with Palm Springs Air Museum, Inc. (Air Museum) for a ten-year extension and include a Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase for certain fees at the Palm Springs International Airport (Airport). RECOMMENDATION: This action will recommend to City Council the approval of Amendment No. 9 to the Lease Agreement No. A3613 with Palm Springs Air Museum, Inc. (Air Museum) for a ten-year extension and include a Consumer Price Index (CPI) increase for certain fees at the Palm Springs International Airport (Airport). BACKGROUND: The Air Museum is a popular attraction serving the entire Coachella Valley tourism industry and has been leasing property at the Palm Springs International Airport since November 1995. The Original Lease has been amended/extended on the following occasions: • Amendment No. 1 was entered into on December 2, 1998, to include improvements of a rent- free office space for the Civil Air Patrol, a 10% food and beverage gross revenue share, and $ .25 per admission ticket for special events. • Amendment No. 2 expanded the original footprint of the real property of the original lease to include the available parking for visitors to the museum and to construct an educational facility and hangar. • On January 1, 2016, the City and the Air Museum entered into Amendment No. 3, which included additional facilities such as a 20,000 square foot hangar, 8,100 square foot hangar restaurant, an aircraft apron tarmac expansion, retention basin, and road access improvements. 1154 ITEM 9.A Airport Commission Staff Report July 10, 2024 -- Page 2 Approve Amendment No. 9 to Lease Agreement No. A3613 with the Palm Springs Air Museum • On February 15, 2020, the City and the Air Museum entered into Amendment No. 4 and leased an additional 10,000 square foot hangar on the airport premises to store aircraft through October 31, 2020. • On November 1, 2020, the City and the Air Museum entered into Amendment No. 5, which extended the term for the 10,000 square foot hangar for an additional six months from November 1, 2020, through April 30, 2021. • The City and the Air Museum entered into Amendment No. 6 on May 1, 2021, to extend the term of the lease of the 10,000 square foot hangar to October 30, 2021. • The City and the Air Museum entered into Amendment No. 7 on November 1, 2022, to extend the hangar for an additional six months from November 1, 2021, through April 30, 2022. On April 12, 2022, the City and the Air Museum extend the lease through December 31, 2022, upon mutual agreement. • On November 9, 2022, the term for the 10,000 square foot hangar was extended by mutual agreement for an additional six months from January 1, 2023 through June 30, 2023. • On July 24, 2023, the City and the Air Museum entered into Amendment No. 8, which extend the term of the lease of the 10,000 square foot hanger to July 31, 2026. STAFF ANALYSIS: The Air Museum facility at the Airport covers approximately sixteen acres on the east side of the airport, adjacent to Gene Autry Trail. This area includes several interconnected aircraft hangars, totaling about 85,000 square feet, which are used to store aircraft and memorabilia accessible to the public. The current lease with the Air Museum expires on November 29, 2035; however the Air Museum is requesting an additional 10-year extension of its existing lease at the Airport ending on November 29, 2045. The extension is at the request of the Air Museum to support a $3.5 million expansion and remodel of the museum's front entry area. The project will add approximately 4,000 square feet of new floor space and impact 4,000 square feet of existing space, with no changes to the current curb line. The remodel will include a 200-seat education center, reconfigured admissions and gift areas, and expanded restroom facilities. Pursuant to Section 3.3 of the Agreement, staff recommends adjusting the monthly admissions fees, facility rental rate and the gross gift sales for giftrate in line with changes in the CPI, subject to certain limitations. The Air Museum has agreed to a CPI adjustment for other fees owed to the City of Palm Springs (City) under the Agreement, including a percentage of gross sales detailed in Section 3.2(a)(i). 1155 Airport Commission Staff Report July 10, 2024 -- Page 3 Approve Amendment No. 9 to Lease Agreement No. A3613 with the Palm Springs Air Museum Furthermore, staff recommends that the City reserve the right to implement a CPI adjustment of the monthly rental and other fees owed for 2025. These additional adjustments will take effect on the one-year anniversary of the 2024 CPI adjustments outlined in this Amendment. Further CPI adjustments after 2025 will occur every five years. The Air Museum has not experienced a CPI increase in the past 20 years, making this adjustment necessary to align fees with current economic conditions and support the airport's ongoing needs. The adjusted monthly rent and fees are described as follows: Per Facility Year Gross Sales Admission Rental 2024 0.30 3.43% 0.30 Additionally, in the past five Fiscal Years the Air Museum has reported the following in Admissions, Gross Sales, and Facility Rental: Fiscal Years 0.25 Per Admission 3% Gross Sales 0.25 Facility Rental 2022-23 $22,939 $17,403 $8,824 2021-22 $18,696 $13,738 $12,526 2020-21 $10,938 $8,694 $388 2019-20 1 $13,908 $6,741 $5,769 2018-19 $19,538 $8,495 $10,175 Total $86,019 $55,071 $37,682 FISCAL IMPACT: The projected revenues for 2024 and 2025 Airport Lease Amendment will generate Admission Fees for an approximate amount of $17,204 applied to account 415.38185, Gross Sales for an approximate amount of $11,015 applied to account 415.38190, and Facility Rental Fees for an approximate amount of $7,537 applied to account 415.38195, for a total amount of $35,756 1156 palm springs INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT AIRPORT COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: July 10, 2024 SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO CONTRACT SERVICES AGREEMENT NO. A9391 WITH MEAD & HUNT INC. FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT COMPREHENSIVE AIRPORT MASTER PLAN FROM: Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director SUMMARY - This action will approve Amendment No. 2 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt, Inc. (Mead & Hunt) to extend the schedule for professional consulting services for the Palm Springs International Airport (Airport) Comprehensive Airport Master Plan to a completion date of July 30, 2026, for an additional amount of $376,340 and a total revised contract amount not to exceed $2,709,476. RECOMMENDATION: This action will recommend to City Council the approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt, Inc, to extend the schedule or professional consulting services for the Palm Springs International Airport Comprehensive Airport Master Plan to a completion date of July 30, 2026, for an additional amount of $376,340 and not to exceed $2,709,476 BACKGROUND: Palm Springs International Airport (Airport) is a commercial service airport consisting of 930 acres serving approximately 3.2 million passengers in 2023. The Airport serves as the major commercial and general aviation air transportation center for Southern California's Coachella Valley. Two previous Airport Master Plans have been prepared for the Airport with the initial plan completed in 2003 and the most recent update completed in 2015. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recommends that airports update Master Plans every five years to reflect changes in the operating environment at the Airport and within the industry as a whole. The Coachella Valley region is showing indications of regional change, which have already had an impact on the Airport. Local resorts have observed increasing occupancy and have Iimmi►TAEsa:1M Airport Commission Staff Report July 10, 2024 -- Page 2 Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt Inc. indicated considerable growth; the Airport has experienced a corresponding increase along the typical indicators which include annual enplanements, annual operations, employee and public parking and rental car transactions. These changing dynamics are resulting in challenges requiring a comprehensive approach to planning for future airside, terminal and landside development scenarios and operational changes. On July 28, 2022, City Council approved the Airport Master Plan scope of work and authorized Staff to proceed with the issuance of a Request for Proposal. On August 15, 2022, the City's Procurement Department, working with the Airport and Information Technology staff, issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) and advertised the RFP in the Desert Sun. Four firms submitted proposals and the proposals were evaluated against the criteria listed in the RFP. The evaluation criteria included experience of the firm, experience of the staff and understanding of the scope of work. After review and analysis by the evaluation committee consisting of staff from the Airport, Engineering, and Community & Economic Development Departments. Mead & Hunt was deemed the highest ranked firm. As cost was not allowed to be evaluated in the initial stage as outlined by FAA regulations, staff negotiated cost with the highest ranked firm to establish a fair reasonable price for the project. The Airport also established a 3rd party independent cost estimate to aid in the negotiation process. The Airport executive staff along with Procurement staff negotiated a fair price for this professional service that was in alignment with the 3rd party independent cost estimate. On January 18, 2023, the Airport Commission voted in favor to recommend to the City Council the approval of a professional service agreement for the Comprehensive Airport Master Plan to Mead & Hunt. On January 26, 2023, the City Council approved Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt for a Comprehensive Airport Master Plan to be completed in 30 months for a total amount not to exceed $2,275,816. In April 2023, an Airport Master Plan Working Group was created with the following working group members: • Chairman Aftab Dada, Airport Commission • Vice Chairman Kevin Corcoran, Airport Commission • Commissioner Scott Miller, Airport Commission • Ken Hedrick, Former Airport Commissioner • Harry Barrett, Jr., Airport Executive Director • Jeremy Keating, Assistant Airport Director • Daniel Meier, Deputy Director of Aviation, Marketing and Air Service • Victoria Carpenter, Airport Administration Manager • Lindsey -Paige McCloy, Director of Sustainability • Larry Klingaman, Director of IT • Joel Montalvo, City Engineer 1158 Airport Commission Staff Report July 10, 2024 -- Page 3 Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt Inc. Upon Airport Commissioner Scott Miller's resignation, Airport Commissioner Kevin Wiseman filled the vacancy. Mead & Hunt and the Airport Master Plan Working Group have held four meetings over the course of 12 months to review materials and discuss the Airport Master Plan recommendations and concepts. On September 19, 2023, a public open house Airport Master Plan event was held at the Palm Springs Convention Center, to present four terminal concept alternatives to the community and to gather the community's feedback. Approximately 160 members of the community attended the open house event and the feedback received from the community did not indicate a strong preference for any one terminal concept alternative. However, a significant number of public comments expressed appreciation for the alternatives preserving and maintaining the iconic Wexler terminal building. On January 25, 2024, the City Council approved Airport Master Plan terminal concept 1A with the direction to staff to bring back an alternative site evaluation for the CONRAC, a description of the ground transportation and access to the airport terminal and facilities, and land acquisition recommendations to accommodate the Airport Master Plan facilities, if necessary. On February 21, 2024, Amendment No. 1 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 was approved to revise the scope of services to encompass supplementary analyses and to increase the contract in the amount of $57,320, for a total amount not to exceed $2,333,136. On March 20, 2024, the Airport Commission received a presentation from Mead & Hunt regarding the Airport Master Plan airside and landside conceptual development plan and voted unanimously (12-0) in favor to recommend to the City Council the approval of the Airport Master Plan airside and landside conceptual development plan. On April 17, 2024, the Airport Commission received a presentation from Mead & Hunt regarding the Airport Master Plan airside and landside conceptual development plan and voted unanimously (13-0) in favor to recommend to the City Council the approval of the onsite CONRAC located east of El Cielo Road and north of East Tahquitz Canyon Way (Site 1). On April 18, 2024, the Airport staff presented the CONRAC alternatives to the current Airport car rental companies listed below, and the rental car companies were unanimously in favor of the onsite CONRAC located east of El Cielo Road and north of East Tahquitz Canyon Way (Site 1). • Alamo Rent A Car and National Car Rental • Avis Budget Car Rental • Dollar Rent A Car and Thrifty Car Rental • Enterprise Rent A Car • Hertz Rental Car 1159 Airport Commission Staff Report July 10, 2024 -- Page 4 Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt Inc. On May 9, 2024, Airport Staff and Mead & Hunt presented the Airport Master Plan airside and landside conceptual development plan to the City Council, and the City Council directed staff to hold additional stakeholder meetings and community outreach meetings, to provide the following information at a future City Council meeting: • Traffic and public parking impacts. • Project manager and construction team plan. • Government affairs plan. • Public -Private Partnership funding for the CONRAC. • Analysis of the details and impacts of the CONRAC. • Analysis of an alternative CONRAC location for the proposed location at the south end of the Airport terminal area adjacent to Kirk Douglas Way. • Project schedule to detail how each phase of the project fits into the long-term timeline at a future City Council meeting. On June 4, 2024, a public open house Airport Master Plan event was held at the Palm Springs Convention Center, to present the Airport Master Plan airside and landside conceptual development plan. Approximately 173 members of the community attended the open house, and the public was provided the opportunity to ask questions and to provide their comments in the open forum. While positive feedback and support was received from the community, many of the questions, concerns, and feedback that was received were in regard to sustainability, traffic, parking, public transportation, preserving the Wexler terminal building, the size of the CONRAC, the number of additional gates and flights, and noise. STAFF ANALYSIS: Per the City Council's direction, Mead & Hunt, Inc. along with their subcontracted firms Aviatrix Communications, M. Arthur Gensler Jr. & Associates, and Daley Strategies (Mead & Hunt Team) have proposed the following project scope elements be implemented into the Airport Master Plan Project scope of work: Develop And Analyze On -Site Consolidated Rental Car (CONRAC) Alternatives This element includes analysis of two additional CONRAC alternatives shown in orange in Figure 1 — CONRAC Site A — North and Figure 2 — CONRAC Site B — South alternatives (Attachment A). CONRAC sizing will be based on the previously developed Master Plan program analysis. New analysis will include detailed two-dimensional drawings illustrating ingress/egress to each CONRAC. These drawings will also illustrate CONRAC shuttling operations and routes and potential public shuttling operations and routes. Analysis of the requirements to expand the Airport property boundary to meet public and rental car parking demand will also be conducted. 1. Development and Analysis of South CONRAC to match existing analysis of North CONRAC 1160 Airport Commission Staff Report July 10, 2024 -- Page 5 Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt Inc. The Mead & Hunt Team will evaluate the south location for the CONRAC facility to compare to the existing analysis conducted for the north CONRAC facility. The evaluation will include footprint requirements, height requirements, ingress and egress locations, routing of rental car shuttles/ vehicles and passenger flows from the terminal building to the CONRAC. The Mead & Hunt Team will develop graphical exhibits illustrating the CONRAC layout on each location and prepare a presentation and narrative summarizing the advantages and disadvantages of each location. The deliverables for this task include a summarization of key data and information on the south CONRAC matching work already completed for the north CONRAC. 2. 3D Renderings and Viewshed Renderings The Mead & Hunt Team will prepare renderings of the south CONRAC, similar to the existing renderings of the north CONRAC. Five views will be included: 1. Aerial view from the west 2. Aerial from east 3. Aerial from the south 4. Eye level view from Kirk Douglas Way looking east 5. Eye level view from Kirk Douglas Way looking west This task also includes preparation of two simulated fly -through style animation visualizations, one for the south CONRAC, and one for the north CONRAC. Both would show the relationship between the Airport and the CONRAC. Each animation would be no more than 30 seconds in length. As a same cost alternative, staff has the option to have the Mead & Hunt Team prepare four panoramic 360 views. Traffic Analvsis of CONRAC. Airport Traffic and Aaencv Coordination In this task, the Mead & Hunt Team will assess and analyze traffic associated with Figure 1 — CONRAC Site A — North and Figure 2 — CONRAC Site B — South alternatives (Attachment A). The goal is a high-level understanding of the potential traffic impact with both alternatives including an assessment of intersections. Data will be collected for up to 10 intersections for the AM and PM peak period on a typical Friday. A traffic model of roadway segments and intersections will be created, and the limits of the model are anticipated to be El Cielo Drive from Aviation Drive to Ramon Road and Ramon Road from El Cielo Road to Gene Autry Trail. Project level traffic data will be developed for the following: • Adjust to seasonal summer peak. • Identify overlapping of Airport and adjacent arterial AM and PM peak hour. • Future year traffic forecasts based on the design day flight schedule/show up profiles, mode of access and growth in regional background non -airport traffic. 1161 Airport Commission Staff Report July 10, 2024 -- Page 6 Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt Inc. The Mead & Hunt Team will conduct a traffic operations and capacity analysis of study intersections and roadway segments for AM and PM peak hours reporting level of service/delay for the following: • Existing Conditions • Future No Build • Future Build (up to two concepts) The Mead & Hunt Team will develop recommendations to refine airport landside concepts, including pedestrian flows, external ingress and egress of parking lots/garages/ground transportation center, traffic controls/signal operations, etc. in order to mitigate any identified traffic issues or concerns. The Mead & Hunt Team will identify intermodal/regional transit enhancements, development of a concept illustration location, footprint size, access for a transit center on or off -airport. The task also includes facilitation of one meeting with regional stakeholders to discuss airport regional transit facility needs and potential airport connection recommendations. Stakeholders could include Riverside County, Sun Line Transit, Amtrak and/or local metropolitan planning organizations (MPOs). The Mead & Hunt Team will make efforts to identify any needed land acquisitions for future parking facilities (passenger or CONRAC or transit facility) and final parking facility location recommendations and size recommendations. The Mead & Hunt Team, including partner firm Aviatrix Communications, understands that the City of Palm Springs is committed to engaging Palm Springs and Coachella Valley stakeholders in the planning process. The Mead & Hunt Team will coordinate with Airport staff to manage stakeholder and public outreach, identify media to share the Airport's vision with stakeholders, provide assistance with the staffing of public meetings and producing exhibits, press releases, project microsite, and presentation materials. The following tasks will also include a customized, strategic approach to outreach and education including airport staff/consultant team meetings, two additional Airport Commission meetings and presentations, and one additional City Council meeting and presentation. Additional Weeklv Airaort Staff Meetinas. Leaislative Relations and Communications Specific critical needs of this project will be identified for related consultant support, and the Mead & Hunt Team anticipates 12 additional weekly meetings with the Airport staff. Additional legislative relations include: Development of a memo assessing the current state of the Airport's external affairs and outlining an outreach strategy with key elected officials and staff at the local, state, and federal levels along with relevant government agencies related to master plan briefings. Track, research, and explore federal, state and county funding opportunities. 1162 Airport Commission Staff Report July 10, 2024 -- Page 7 Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt Inc. Begin to develop and implement a comprehensive legislative plan to support funding requests for the overall Airport Master Plan. Additional communications include: Work collaboratively with Mead & Hunt Team on communications materials, press releases, position letters, presentations, and briefings prior to events in which Airport staff and City Councilmembers participate. Provide strategic counsel to Airport staff on media relations, community outreach, and engagement. Assist the Airport staff with developing and executing an impactful social media strategy. Additional Stakeholder Meeting for Airport Tenants and Additional Community Relations Support An additional stakeholder meeting will be conducted with the Airport tenants, and the Mead & Hunt Team will present the preliminary results of the analysis on CONRAC and traffic/visual impacts. Additional community relations and stakeholder outreach will be conducted, and the Mead & Hunt Team will also provide the following: • Support the Airport staff on meetings and messaging to discuss the CONRAC analysis, traffic study and overall Airport Master Plan. • Develop a holistic stakeholder and community relations plan that includes Palm Springs stakeholders as well as communities in the Coachella Valley. • Organize and execute community events to engage stakeholders and raise awareness of the Airport's ongoing initiatives and goals for the future. Additional Public Open House Meetings There are several public -engagement opportunities identified in the original Airport Master Plan schedule. These key milestones include project kickoff, terminal concepts review, airport master plan review, and draft final master plan report, as well as the public meetings required in the CEQA process. In addition to these meetings, Aviatrix Communications will support two meetings regarding the additional analysis included in this amendment scope, primarily related to the consolidated rental car center. One meeting will be held in -person, likely in a large, centralized location such as the Palm Springs Convention Center, and one meeting will be virtual, allowing the public to participate via Zoom. It is anticipated that these meetings will take place in October 2024. For each meeting and or event, the team will support Airport staff and City outreach staff by coordinating logistics; jointly developing informational materials, presentations, press releases and/or talking points; participating in prep sessions by phone or in -person, providing staffing as appropriate; and summarizing key stakeholder comments, questions, and concerns to help determine next steps. 1163 Airport Commission Staff Report July 10, 2024 -- Page 8 Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt Inc. Proiect Microsite To ensure the public has access to accurate, up-to-date project information, the Mead & Hunt Team will develop and maintain the project microsite. This comprehensive website will include project timelines, frequently asked questions, draft chapters, event calendar, and information from public meetings. Aviatrix Communications will develop, host, and maintain the microsite, and specific content for the website will be developed by the Mead & Hunt Team and may include reports, tables, drawings, and other graphics as required. The site will be ADA compliant, accessible on any device or browser, and will utilize Google Translate to make project information available in multiple languages. The public will not be required to register to view and/or download documents. The microsite will also provide an opportunity for the public to submit online comments for consideration by Airport staff and the Mead & Hunt Team. To account for an extended project schedule, Aviatrix Communications is prepared to host and maintain the project microsite for an additional 12 months. Proiect Materials In addition to the digital documents available on the project microsite, the Mead & Hunt Team will develop printed material to hand out during public meetings, inform stakeholders, and to clarify information. Such materials may include but are not limited to presentation display boards, PowerPoint presentations, fact sheets, meeting advertisements, and social media posts. Documentation An effective Master Plan places emphasis on developing concise, effective study documentation. Several types of materials will be revised and expanded upon to document the additional planning process. This task includes additions necessary to the Terminal Alternatives, Master Plan Development Program and Financial Implementation chapters. The Mead & Hunt Team will develop graphics, typically in the form of PowerPoint presentations, to convey the project information as necessary for various meetings. It is anticipated that these PowerPoints can be utilized by Airport staff for additional community and stakeholder outreach, as required. The Mead & Hunt Team will also provide narrative additions to the Airport Master Plan chapters. Airport staff is recommending the approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt, Inc. to extend the schedule for professional consulting services for the Palm Springs International Airport Comprehensive Airport Master Plan to a completion date of July 30, 2026, and for an additional amount of $376,340 for a total revised contract amount not to exceed $2,709,476 to ensure the completion of the Airport Master Plan in accordance with the City Council's direction to the Airport staff and Mead & Hunt. 1164 Airport Commission Staff Report July 10, 2024 -- Page 9 Approval of Amendment No. 2 to Contract Services Agreement No. A9391 with Mead & Hunt Inc. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this action would require the appropriation of $376,340 from the Airport Capital Project Fund 416 to the account 4167065-80000 in Fiscal Year 2024-25. 1165 Figure 1 - CONRAC SITE A - North ATTACH ME NT A LOT A AJ# AmaUr 4. AUTO PARKING LOT AREA SPACES* A 70,000 SF N/A B 80,000 SF N/A C 337,000 SF 1036 D 56,000 SF 172 E 181,000 SF 556 F 123,000 SF 378 342,000 SF 1052 Based on assumption of 325 SF per parking area (includes circulation) 0 200' q00, &R,9PPIC 5CqLF /A/ FFFT LOT B LOT C NOV r LOT G LOT E J# V, NNW qw�,,Jl allir-ZIR 007 N, nw_ r. Aalm springs MASTER PLAN O IN7ERNATINAL AIRPORT M 4-x ♦ + zo Ike zv; LEGEND: EXISTING SIGNAL P� PROPOSED SIGNAL + AIRCRAFT AT GATE + AIRCRAFT RON + AIRCRAFT MOVEMENT AREA EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN HEADHOUSE A PARKING CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT CONCOURSE GROUND TRANSPORTATION CENTER COURTYARD / GREENSPACE CONRAC FUTURE PROPERTY ACQUISITION EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY Source: Gensler and Mead & Hunt, 2023 1166 Figure 2 - CONRAC SITE B - South i f -1 1-1 i „ ^ LOT A ♦♦ \\ SHUTTLE ♦ / `\ LOl ♦ �\ \\ TNI A. AUTO PARKING LOT AREA SPACES* A 70,000 SF N/A B 80,000 SF N/A C 337,000 SF 1036 D 56,000 SF 172 E 342,000 SF 1052 * Based on assumption of 325 SF per parking area (includes circulation) ti LOT D �\ Z, /SOP \/4 w QTA & MAINTENANCE / r., ,% G �_}. '• _ •�.'Y. LEGEND: ��� • '�• • EXISTING S /(10 w., r . PROPOSED SIGNAL AIRCRAFT AT GATE 0 AIRCRAFT RON LOT E AIRCRAFT MOVEMENT AREA EXISTING BUILDING TO REMAIN HEADHOUSE PARKING '. CENTRAL UTILITY PLANT CONCOURSE f��+• + 1 GROUND TRANSPORTATION CENTER COURTYARD / GREENSPACE CONRAC + C FUTURE PROPERTY ACQUISITION EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY Lqwpalm springs r MASTER PLAN � INTERNATICINAL AIRPORT s 4-x Source: Gensler and Mead & Hunt, 2023 1167 ■ Ap 9 Air Servic�Upda 6- Ju1y2024 -" *w - L",m 0 m A rpalm spring INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CSeats vs. l Year Ago Month % Change - August - 5.2 % September - 3.0 % October 5.8 % Scheduled Departing Seats Based on 06/12/24 schedule data, subject to change. 180,000 160,000 140,000 120,000 100,000 80,000 60,000 40,000 20,000 0 77,146 170,591 95,976 81,356 90,417 93,181 107,A35 August September 2024 ■ 2023 ■ 2022 152,520 161,282 October Bar Graph: Left to right: 2024, 2023, 2022 1169 Item 95 W-..a Lqw- m S rir� s AINTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Air Service Air Service & Other Updates • United increasing seasonal Houston service to twice daily on Saturday and Sunday in November and December. • Previously one daily. Already twice daily in height of season. Public Roadway Banners • RFP issued to replace banner brackets on roadway light poles • Many are breaking due to age • RFP scope includes printing and installation of new banners up to four times per year for the entire roadway system, and up to six times per year in the center median in front of the terminal • Call outs to replace damaged banners as needed Customer Experience Program • Initial scope development research complete • Meeting on July 11 to review and determine next steps Item 9.F 1170 W-..a nw_ m S rir� s AINTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Newsletter • Finalizing distribution program • Planning re -launch this quarter • Monthly distribution and as needed for announcements TSA PreCheck Enrollment at PSP • Services opened on July 2, 2024 • Offers initial enrollments, renewals, and identity verification • Non appointment necessary • Applications are processed at the CLEAR Pods in Center Terminal area Air Service & Other Updates Item 951171 palm springs _ FRASCA at AssOCIA'rEs, LLC 521 MADISON AVENUE, SEVENTH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10022 TEL: 212 355-4050 TO: Victoria A. Carpenter, C.M., Airport Administration Manager FROM: Frasca & Associates, LLC SUBJECT: Parking Rate Review DATE: July 3, 2024 Summary Frasca & Associates, LLC (FRASCA) was retained by the City of Palm Springs ("City') to review the parking rate structure for Palm Springs International Airport ("PSP" or "the Airport") in the context of the parking rate structures at peer Southern California airports and Airport financial requirements. The objectives of this study were to: • Benchmark PSP's parking rate structure versus competing airports in Southern California • Estimate incremental revenues to PSP resulting from a proposed increase in the maximum daily parking rate from $20 to $24 The key findings of this study are: • Parking is a critical revenue source for PSP and the most flexible source for the Airport to use in increasing revenues • Recent inflationary trends have eroded the financial contribution of PSP's parking operations • PSP's current parking rates are below market relative to peers • Increasing parking rates to market levels would provide revenues for PSP to fund needed capital improvements Based on these findings, FRASCA finds that the proposed increase in the maximum daily parking rate from $20 to $24 is reasonable. FRASCA estimates the rate increase will result in approximately $1 million in additional annual revenues that will provide additional funding and reduce the amount of debt needed to be issued to fund the Airport's capital improvement program. Parking Is a Critical Revenue Source for PSP Airport operators have two broad groups of revenue sources —those from airlines (i.e., "airline revenues") and those from all other sources, collectively referred to in the industry as "nonairline revenues." Airline revenues generally include landing fees and terminal rentals and use fees, while nonairline revenues include those paid by passengers either directly (e.g., parking) or indirectly (e.g., privilege fees for terminal concessions) as well as those paid by other airport tenants through ground and facility rentals and other charges. As a condition of receiving federal grants, airport operators are required to use cost -recovery methodologies to set airline rates, fees, and charges —in short, surpluses above financial requirements cannot be generated from airfield and terminal facilities used by airlines and other aeronautical users. FRASCA &AssoC1ATEs,LLC Page 1 of 7 1 1172 Item 9.H palm springs There are no similar federal restrictions, however, regarding rate -making for nonairline facilities. In fact, Federal Aviation Administration policies encourage airport operators to set rates and charges for nonairline facilities using market -based approaches in order to ensure airports are self-sustaining and maximize revenues for reinvestment into airport facilities. Rating analysts and investors also have the expectation (and increasingly so) that airport operators will use commercial approaches for managing nonairline facilities to enhance the airport's creditworthiness and access to capital. Since nonairline rate - making is driven by commercial principles, they are the key driver of net revenue surpluses for airport operators. These surpluses are required by the FAA to be reinvested into the airport, which means that they directly reduce the amount of debt an airport must issue to fund capital improvements. Table 1 OPERATING REVENUES Palm Springs International Airport For Fiscal Year Ending June 30, 2023 (Dollars in thousands) Line item Airline Revenues Amount totalShare of Landing fees $5,990 16.0% Terminal rentals and use fees 3,667 9.8% Subtotal $9,657 25.7% Nonairline Revenues Rental car privilege fees $12,748 34.0% Parking and ground transportation 7,523 20.1% Terminal concessions 2,012 5.4% FBO and general aviation 1,848 4.9% All other 3,726 9.9% Subtotal $27,857 74.3% Total $37,514 100.0% Note: Numbers may not add to totals shown due to rounding. Parking is typically one of the top nonairline revenue sources for airports. As shown in Table 1, preceding, parking (including ground transportation user fees) is PSP's second largest nonairline revenue source after rental car privilege fees, accounting for 27.0%of nonairline revenues and 20.1% of operating revenues for FY 2023. (Rental car privilege fees are typically the top nonairline revenue source in leisure markets such as PSP.) Moreover, parking is the revenue source most directly within management's direct control for increasing revenues. While rental car privilege fees are a higher revenue generator than parking, the business terms are largely dictated by the industry standard 10%-of-gross-receipts concession fee and rental car rates, which are out of control of airport management. Similarly, business provisions for terminal concessions are largely dictated by industry -wide business practices, and land and building leases are generally dictated by appraisals. While parking rates are constrained somewhat by competitive FRAscA &AssoC1ATEs, LLC 9.H - Page 2 of 7 Page 2 of 7 2 1173 Item 9.H ,j palm springs '�- Ni E7 NAT I ONAL AIR PO R7 industry forces, airports such as PSP that have very limited off -airport parking competition and have minimal competition from other airports are considered "price -setters." Revenues from rate increases, therefore, generally flow directly to the airport's bottom line, generating additional funds for reinvestment into airport facilities. Recent Inflationary Trends Have Eroded the Financial Performance of PSP's Parking Operations The financial performance of airport parking operations is determined by the parking rate structure, passenger volume, passenger composition (e.g., level of business versus leisure traffic), and the level of operating and capital costs. While operating costs in a "steady state" scenario can be assumed to increase with underlying inflation, parking revenues do not without a change in the rate structure. Therefore, without changes in passenger volume or composition, net parking revenues decrease over time on an operating basis. FRAscA's assessment of PSP's parking operations finds that: • Daily parking rates have not increased since 2018 • On an inflation -adjusted basis through May 2024, parking rates have lost approximately 30% of their value since the last rate increase, i.e., the $20 daily rate imposed in 2018 is worth approximately $14 in constant dollars • Cost inflation, deferred maintenance, and a new parking operator contract have increased PSP's parking operating expenses • While major investments in parking facilities have not been recently required, the City expects to incur material costs from investments in parking upgrades and systems modernization such as a new revenue control system, electric vehicle (EV) chargers, and resulted infrastructure These factors have combined to result in a material deterioration in net revenues from parking operations. This deterioration can only be expected to continue to increase with ongoing inflationary pressures. Other things equal, this erosion can be expected to result in PSP having to issue more debt than otherwise necessary to fund capital improvements. Indeed, the parking rate structure is the only variable within direct management control to improve the financial contribution of parking operations. PSP's Current Parking Rates Are Below Market Relative to Peers Parking rates typically vary by time (with maximum hourly and daily rates), by proximity to terminal (walkable or nonwalkable requiring a shuttle), shuttle bus frequency, and whether the parking spaces are covered or uncovered. Parking rates should also be influenced by the profile of the airport's passengers, with airports located in more economically affluent areas generally able to charge higher rates than those located in economically depressed areas in which passengers are typically more price -sensitive. PSP operates 4 public parking lots, all within walking distance of the terminal. A remote lot is used as needed for overflow. There is no off -airport parking competition. PSP has the ability to set parking rates, subject to the approval of the City Council. FRAscA's review of parking rates at other Southern California airports found that the Airport has among the lowest parking rates among peer airports. This review is summarized in Table 2 following, which prevents a survey of rates at walkable parking facilities at selected Southern California airports, the 7 F1tAscA &AssociArEs, LLC Page 3of7 3 1174 Item 9.H !i palm springs number of spaces provided, and the approximate walking distance in feet from the center of the parking lot to the terminal entrance. The survey found that: • Only Santa Barbara (SBA) offers a lot at a rate lower than $20, but it is located at a farther walking distance than all lots at PSP except Lot D. • While John Wayne Airport (SNA) charges the same $20 parking rate as Palm Springs for facilities at a comparable walking distance, the Airport is currently pursuing a rate increase. • Long Beach Airport's (LGB) most convenient garage has a maximum daily rate of $25, but has a less convenient walkable garage charged at a $20 rate. This facility has higher walking distances than every facility at PSP but Lot D. • Similarly, Ontario International Airport (ONT) has a much less convenient, but still walkable surface lot charging a $20 rate in addition to the surface lots at more comparable distances to the PSP lots, which charge rates of $24 and $30. When the demographic profile of PSP travelers is considered, the difference is even more stark. PSP has is an affluent metro area, with high household incomes. The most widely accepted surrogate measure for passenger composition is average fare, with higher average fares typically indicative of a market with more affluent passengers or one driven by more business traffic. As shown in Table 2 following, average domestic airfares at PSP are among the highest of Southern California airports. While Santa Barbara Airport and Los Angeles International Airport have nominally higher fares, they are only $4 (1.9%) and $2 (0.9%) higher than PSP's, respectively. PSP's average fares are 18.3% higher than ONT and 62.6% higher than LGB, the peer airport with the lowest average fare. Also shown in Table 2 are the maximum daily parking rates for each airport expressed as a percentage of the average fare as an indicator of relative affordability. The data show that, when measured as a percentage of average fare, the maximum daily rates at PSP for walkable parking are at the lowest of benchmark airports. PSP's maximum daily parking rate is only 9.4% of its average fare, lower than only the less convenient long-term lot at SBA. Excluding SBA, the ratio of the maximum daily parking rate for walkable parking at benchmark airports ranges from a minimum of 10.6% at other airports and as high as 30.2% at Hollywood Burbank Airport. These data provide further evidence that PSP is charging below -market parking rates. If PSP set its maximum daily rate at the same ratio to its average fare as BUR for the short-term garage, for example, the rate would be $64. Finally, the PSP parking lots are often fully occupied, with the Airport having to open the remote overflow lot to accommodate demand. In CY 2023, for example, at least one of the Airport's four lots was completely occupied on 105 days of the year, or approximately 29% of the days in the year, a clear indication that demand is higher than supply and that parkers who may otherwise be willing to pay more are being driven away. Industry studies indicate that, once frequent travelers are unable to find a parking space more than once, they change their travel mode to the airport out of fear of missing their flights. FRASCA &AssoC1ATEs, LLC Page 4 of 7 4 1175 Item 9.H Table 2 BENCHMARK MAXIMUM DAILY PARKING RATES AND COMPARISON WITH AVERAGE AIRFARES Palm Springs International Airport and Selected Southern California Airports Walking Average Max daily Maximum Number distance one-way rate as % Airport/lot daily rate of spaces (feet) (a) airfare (b) of airfare Palm Springs International Airport Lot A $20 106 300 $213 9.4% Lot B 20 244 400 213 9.4% Lot C 20 245 800 213 9.4% Lot D 20 285 1,300 213 9.4% Los Angeles International Airport Terminal garages* $60 8,300 300 $215 27.9% San Diego International Airport Terminal Parking Plaza* $38 3,400 600 $189 20.1% Hollywood Burbank Airport Short -Term Garage* $42 430 300 $139 30.2% Lot E 28 (c) 600 139 20.1% Lot F 28 (c) 800 139 20.1% Lot G 26 (c) 800 139 18.7% Ontario International Airport Lots 2/4 Premium $30 699 200 $187 16.0% Lots 2/4 General 24 (d) 400 187 12.8% Lot 3 20 (d) 1,600 187 10.7% Santa Barbara Airport Short -Term Lot $27 380 200 $217 12.4% Long -Term Lot 18 2,680 900 217 8.3% Long Beach Airport Garage A* $25 990 300 $131 19.1% Garage B* 20 2,440 900 131 15.3% John Wayne Airport Garage Al $20 1,470 600 $189 10.6% Garage A2 20 1,590 800 $189 10.6% Garage B2 20 1,500 400 189 10.6% Garage C 20 2,000 500 189 10.6% Source: Frasca analysis of individual airport websites, Google Maps, and the AXN Airport Fact Book. (a) Approximate walking distance from center of lot to terminal entrance. (b) U.S. Department of Transportation DB1B database, accessed via Diio Mi, June 15, 2024. Excludes taxes and ancillary charges (e.g., baggage, boarding, and seating fees). (c) Spaces by surface lot not available. BUR has approximately 6,600 total spaces, including the short-term garage and a remote, nonwalkable economy lot. (d) Spaces by lot not available. ONT has approximately 6,800 total spaces, including two remote, nonwalkable economy lots served by shuttles. 1176 Page 5 of 7 Item 9.H !i palm springs Increasing Parking Rates to Market Levels Would Provide Revenues for PSP to Fund Needed Capital Improvements Based on the benchmarking results in Table 2, PSP is proposing a 20% increase in the maximum daily parking rate from $20 to $24. As with any good or service, one cannot expect a proportionate 20% increase in parking revenues resulting from the rate increase as the price increase will result at least some customers on the margin will decide to "trade off" by consuming a "substitute good" or not choosing not consume altogether. For parking, this means choosing an alternative mode, such as a taxi, Transportation Network Company (e.g., Lyft or Uber), or being dropped off by family or friends. This economic concept is known as "elasticity," or the ratio of the percent change in quantity demanded to the percent change in price. In economic theory, elasticity ranges from 0.00 to -1.00 are considered relatively inelastic as the demand does not decrease by as much as an increase in cost (e.g., a 20% increase in price leads to a 10% decrease in demand, or an elasticity of -0.50, meaning that revenues increase 10% following the 20% price increase). This situation implies current prices are below market as more customers than not would be willing to pay more for the same good. An elasticity of exactly -1.00 means that the demand decreases by exactly the same increase in price (e.g., a 20% increase in price leads to a 20% decrease in demand such that total revenues would be unchanged after the price increase). An elasticity of less than -1.00 means that demand decreases by more than the price increase (e.g., a 20% increase in price leads to a 30% decrease in demand such that total revenues would be less following a price increase. Therefore, other things equal, a price increase for a good with an elasticity of less than -1.00 would not be rational as it would not generate additional revenues. In FRASCA's experience, elasticity ratios for parking depend on the magnitude of the increase and the time since the last increase. Generally, FRASCA assumes an elasticity ratio of -0.25 for a modest increase in walkable parking rates when there has not been a rate change in more than 3 years. This ratio implies that a 20% increase in parking rates will result in a 5% decrease in volume and therefore a 15% increase in parking revenues. FRASCA's estimate of FY 2024 actual parking revenues based on 10 months of available data is $6.538 million. Therefore, assuming the increase in the maximum daily parking rate from $20 to $24 and the -0.25 elasticity, FRASCA estimates annual parking revenues would increase 15%, or $0.981 million, to $7.519 million. These additional revenues would provide funding for needed capital improvements. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Conclusions and Recommendations In summary, a parking rate increase is justifiable for both cost -based and market -based reasons. From a cost -based perspective, a rate increase is justifiable to preserve the historical level of financial contribution of parking operations to PSP's net revenues, while from a market -based perspective, a rate increase is justifiable to keep rates in line with peer airports. Consistent with the findings outlined above, FRASCA recommends PSP increases its maximum daily parking rate from $20 to $24. It is worth noting with regard to this recommended rate that: FRASCA &AssoC1ATE5, LLC Page 6 of 7 6 1177 Item 9.H palRm springs IN TlaNATiONAL AIR PORT • As shown in Table 3, following, it would still be lower than the $20 rate implemented in 2018, as adjusted for inflation. When adjusted for inflation, the $20 rate in 2018 is equivalent to a $26 rate today. • The recommended maximum daily rate would remain at or below that for all benchmark airports except SNA and those for less convenient facilities at LGB, ONT, and SBA. • When expressed as a percentage of average fare, the maximum daily garage rate would be below that for all benchmark airports except SNA and the least convenient walkable parking facilities at ONT and SBA. Consistent with PSP's goals to improve parking's financial contribution to airport net revenues by adjusting rates to market, FRASCA recommends the adoption of this rate structure. Additionally, FRASCA recommends that PSP evaluate parking financial performance and benchmark parking rates at least every two years, as consistent with industry best practices, to keep rates aligned with the local market. Table 4 RECOMMENDED PARKING RATE Palm Springs International Airport FRASCA &AssoC1ATEs,LLC Page 7 of 7 7 1178 Item 9.H Operating Revenue Operating Expenditures Surplus / (Deficit) 10,000,000 8,000,000 6,000,000 4,000,000 2,000,000 (2,000,000) (4,000,000) ' CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending June 30, 2024 9,181,327 9,495,365 11,780,574 - 103% 8,873,352 0% - 7% 0% (2,599,247) 9,495,365 -365% 8,873,352 -7% Fund 405 - Customer Facility Charges - Net Balance (2,599,247) ■ FY 23-24 ■ FY 23-24 ■ FY 22-23 Revised Budget Actual Actual Fund 405 is the airports fund for customer facility charges (CFC). Revenues CFC revenue is collected by the car rental concessionaires and remitted to the Airport according to state law to support the future consolidated rental car facility project. In March 2022, City Council approved a change in the collection methodology rate from $10 per transaction to $9 per day up to five days maximum. YTD, revenues of $9.5M represents 103% of the full year budget, reflecting seasonal nature of CFC revenues. Expenditures YTD, the airport has not spent any of the Fund 405 budgeted expenditures. Page 1 of 11 Item 9.J 1 17i '2024 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending June 30, 2024 Operating Revenue 6,450,776 6,196,697 96% 5,910,577 _ 5% Operating Expenditures 9,072,099 340,291 4% 452,135 -25% Surplus / (Deficit) (2,621,323) 5,856,406 -223% 5,458,442 7% 6,000,000 5,000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2,000,000 1,000,000 (1,000,000) (2,000,000) (3,000,000) Fund 410 - Passenger Facility Charges - Net Balance (2,621,323) ■ FY 23-24 ■ FY 23-24 ■ FY 22-23 Revised Budget Actual Actual Fund 410 is the airports fund for passenger facility charges (PFC). Revenues The PFC, provides a source of additional capital to improve, expand, and repair the nation's airport infrastructure. The FAA must approve any facility charges imposed on enplaning passengers. The PFC at PSP is $4.50 and the maximum PFC charge on any one passenger travel ticket is capped at $18.00. YTD, revenues of $6.21VI represents 96% of the full year budget, reflecting seasonal nature of CFC revenues. Expenditures On July 18, 2019, the City of Palm Springs issued 2019 Airport Passenger Facility Charge Revenue Bonds for $22,270,000 to finance a portion of the design, acquisition, and construction of ticketing hall and baggage handling system improvements. Interest is payable semiannually on June 1, and December 1 of each year, commencing December 1, 2019, until maturity or earlier redemption. Fiscal year 2024 principal is $1,690,000 and interest is $807,000. Expenses to fund 410 include principal and interest and contractual services to the bond consultant. YTD expenses of $340,291 represents the interest payments for the 2019 bond. Item 9.J 1 IAQ'2024 Page 2 of 11 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending June 30, 2024 Operating Revenue 64,090,869 45,364,251 71% 53,751,639 _ -16% Operating Expenditures 51,371,103 30,639,297 60% 23,504,014 30% Surplus / Deficit 12,719,766 14,724,953 116% 30,247,625 -51% Fund 415 is the airports operation & maintenance fund which records for all the revenues and expenditures. Revenues Airport revenues included operating and non -operating revenues from airlines, fuel fees, terminal rentals, ground rentals, concessions, fines, parking, ground transportation, grant reimbursements, admission fees for the Palm Springs Air Museum and interest income. Expenditures Airport expenditures consist of personnel, contractual services, safety and security (Aircraft Rescue and Fire Fighting (ARFF) and law enforcement), utilities, maintenance, supplies, operating equipment, insurance, employee development, equipment rentals and repairs. 1181 Item 9.J 7/2/2024 Page 3 of 11 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending June 30, 2024 Operating Revenue Airline Revenue Landing Fees 5,910,134 5,620,399 95% 3,570,069 57% Landing Fee Surcharge - (93,778) 0% 2,181,634 -104% Terminal Airline Space/Joint Use 9,467,216 5,396,901 57% 2,187,385 147% Gate Per Use Fees 3,470,605 1,673,522 48% 1,410,910 19% Passenger Loading Bridge Fee 1,255,064 630,613 50% - 0% Baggage Handling System Fees 897,000 812,189 91% (6,904) -11864% Total Airline Revenues 21,000,019 14,039,847 67% 9,343,094 50% Other Revenue CARES Act - - 0% 5,989,698 -100% CRRSAA-Airport 4,783,916 1,408,292 29% - 0% CRRSAA-Concessions 280,390 - 0% 280,390 -100% ARPA-Airport 1,481,290 - 0% 9,310,342 -100% ARPA - Concessions 1,121,560 - 0% (280,390) -100% Total Other Revenue 7,667,156 1,408,292 18% 15,300,040 -91% Non -Airline Revenue General Aviation 406,000 388,937 96% 403,501 -4% Non -Aeronautical Ground Rental 457,315 639,631 140% 420,511 52% Aeronautical Ground Rental 1,247,329 1,266,964 102% 1,397,783 -9% Parking 6,697,064 6,368,986 95% 6,222,599 2% Airport Use Permits 53,263 110,657 208% 85,164 30% Non -Airline Terminal Rent Fee 9,998,816 3,277,497 33% 2,507,370 31% Rental Car - Overflow Parking 371,809 185,438 50% 196,857 -6% Advertising 315,951 569,217 180% 423,074 35% On Airport Rental Car 11,944,780 11,374,511 95% 12,169,023 -7% Commercial Services Fees 1,099,000 1,243,468 113% 1,142,506 9% Ground Transportation Fees 1,195,000 1,431,102 120% 1,204,033 19% Customs 336,296 440,184 131% 427,008 3% All Other Revenue 1,301,070 2,619,521 201% 2,509,075 4% Total Non -Airline Revenue 35,423,694 29,916,112 84% 29,108,505 3% Total Operating Revenues 64,090,869 45,364,251 71% 53,751,639 -16% 1182 Item 9.J 7/2/2024 Page 4 of 11 60,000,000 50,000,000 45,364,251 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 0 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending June 30, 2024 YTD Actual Revenue 53,751,639 63% 1735 33,016,458 FY 23-24 FY 22-23 FY 20-21 Note: FY22-23 had $15.3M in revenues from one-time CARES & ARPA grant funds YTD actual revenue is $8.3M below the prior year because the prior year YTD included: CARES ACT funding of $6M and ARPA funding of $9.3M that will not repeat in the current year or future fiscal years. Adjusting for these two items, revenue is up 18% YTD over the prior year. FY 23-24 OPERATING FUND REVENUES BY CATEGORY Total Nor Airline Revenue 66% ital Airline tevenues 31% Fotal Other Revenue 3% 1183 Page 5 of 11 Item 9.J 7/2/2024 Operating Expenditures Airport Administration Airport Information Technology Airport Law Enforcement Aviation Security Airside Operations Airport Rescue - Fire Landside Operations Grounds Maintenance Terminal Building Operations Passenger Boarding Bridges Baggage Handling System Control Center Operations U.S. Customs Planning & Projects Airport Pass Thru to Others PERS Cost Recovery Budget Transfer Out Total Operating Expenditures CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending June 30, 2024 8,155,945 5,036,261 _ 62% 4,577,919 1,026,206 458,771 45% 92,736 3,130,981 3,211,249 103% 2,918,942 1,936,264 287,423 15% - 5,981,668 4,646,163 78% 387,280 4,828,582 3,770,211 78% 3,333,328 2,217,250 1,919,989 87% 1,436,783 691,680 371,644 54% 500,409 8,270,483 4,547,282 55% 6,302,485 120,000 35,434 30% 18,163 897,000 438,495 49% 344,362 4,169,247 4,040,352 97% 3,315,823 336,436 298,305 89% 275,785 723,776 127,124 18% - 1,401,950 1,396,342 100% - 500,000 - 0% - 6,983,634 - 0% - 10% 10% 0% 1100% 13% 34% -26% -28% 95% 27% 22% 8% 0% 0% 0% 0% 51,371,103 30,585,044 60% 23,504,014 -30% Surplus / (Deficit) 12,719,766 14,779,206 116% 30,247,625 -51% 1184 Page 6 of 11 Item 9.J 7/2/2024 35,000,000 30,639,297 30,000,000 25,000,000 30% 20,000,000 15,000,000 10,000,000 5,000,000 FY 23-24 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending June 30, 2024 YTD Actual Expenditures 3% 23,504,014 — 22,881,798 u.a. Airport Pass Airport Control Customs Thru to Center Administration 1% 1 Others... 16% Airport Law Operations, Enforcement 13% 10% Termin Buildir g 1 Operations Landside 15% Operations Grounds 6% Maintenance 1% Fire 12% III Aviation Security 1% Airside Operations 15% FY 23-24 OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES BY DEPARTMENT 904 % FY 22-23 FY 21-22 Materi+ Suppl 8% Utilities 5% Page 7 of 11 Insurance Other City 20i Services Services 19% FY 23-24 OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES BY CATEGORY laries & enefitr 56% 1185 Item 9.J 7/2/2024 Operating Revenue _ Operating Expenditures _ Surplus / (Deficit) 5,000,000 (5,000,000) ` (10,000,000) (15,000,000) CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending June 30, 2024 69,701,796 90,906,076 1,968,678 5,799,591 3% 3,694,998 -47% 6% 4,365,246 33% (21,204,280) (3,830,913) 18% (670,248) 472% Fund 416 - Airport Capital Projects - Net Balance (20,000,000) (21,204,280) (25,000,000) ■ FY 23-24 ■ FY 23-24 ■ FY 22-23 ■ #REF! Revised Budget Actual Actual Fund 416 is the airports capital program Revenues Airport Improvement Program (AIP) grants are offered to PSP to provide funding assistance for eligible capital projects that meet the criteria of the federal program. Additional funding is being distributed through AIP grant program by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL). These grants have a 9.34% local share and the remaining 90.66% are reimbursed by the FAA. Revenues in excess of the Airport Operations & Maintenance are transferred to fund 416 to cover capital projects. Expenditures The airports Capital Improvement Program and Capital Outlay projects are shown on a separate sheet. Under the new the AULA, the airlines will be charged amortization for certain capital projects to help recover its portion of funds used for capital assets. A capital expenditure is any single item that costs $300,000 or more with a useful life in excess of three years, including planning studies, environmental studies, and environmental mitigation measures. YTD there is a deficit of $3.8M. At the end of the year, fund 415 will transfer the surplus to the capital account to fund the deficit. We expect revenue to be $85M below budget due to the push out of associated capital projects. The corresponding expenses for the pushed out projects will also be deferred to future fiscal years. 1186 Item 9.J 7/2/2024 Page 8of11 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending June 30, 2024 Fund 405 Fund 410 Fund 415 Fund 416 50,000,000 47,388,168 40,000,000 30,000,000 20,000,000 10,000,000 (10,000,000) 38,107,218 Cash by Fund 1,748,476 93 Fund 405 Fund 410 ■ FY 23-24 ■ FY 22-23 Actual Actual 47,388,168 38,107,218 2,795,893 2,748,476 15,053,523 32,923,685 (913,480) 5,567,879 32,923,685 15,053,5 5,567,879 (913,480) Fund 415 Fund 416 1187 Item 9.J Page 9 of 11 7/2/2024 1185 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending June 30, 2024 Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES) - Expires - May 10, 2024 Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSA)- Airport Operations Expires - April 14, 2025 Coronavirus Response and Relief Supplemental Appropriations (CRRSA)- Concessions Expires - May 31, 2025 American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) - Concession Expires - May 31, 2025 American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) - Airport Operations Expires - August 10, 2025 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL)* Expires - 2027 Total Grants Grants - Remaining Balance $18,000,000 $16,000,000 $14,000,000 $12,000,000 $11,067,877.0 $10,000,000 $8,000,000 11,067,877 11,067,877 - 4,785,805 4,785,805 - 280,390 280,390 - 1,121,560 1,121,560 - 10,791,632 10,791,632 - 15,918,762 - 15,918,762 43,966,026 28,047,264 15,918,762 $6,000,000 $4,785,805.0 $4,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,121,560.0 $280,390.0 _ $0 $10,791,632.0 $15,918,762.0 Coronavirus Coronavirus Coronavirus Response Response American Aid, Relief, and Relief and Relief American Rescue Plan and Supplementa Supplementa Rescue Plan Act of 2021 Bipartisan Economic I I Act of 2021 (ARPA) - Infrastructur Security Act Appropriatio Appropriatio (ARPA) Airport a Law (BIL)* (CARES) - ns )- ns (CRRSA)- Concession Operations Expires - Expires - Airportirport Concessions Expires Expires - 2027 May 10, Operations Expires - May 31, August 10, 2024 Expires - May 31, 2025 2025 Aprill4, 2025 2 025 ■ Grant Awarded by the FAA to the Airport 11,067,877 4,785,805 280,390 1,121,560 10,791,632 15,918,762 ■ Actual Used as of 6/30/24 11,067,877 4,785,805 280,390 1,121,560 10,791,632 - Remaining Actual Unused - - - - - 15,918,762 Note: The BIL grant is allocated to the inbound baggage claim project 7/2/2024 Item 9.J 1188 Page 10 of 11 CITY OF PALM SPRINGS PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT Financial Summary Ending June 30, 2024 BUDGET BUM= BUDGET BUDGET PRIOR EXPENSES TO PROJECT NAME FY 2021-2022 FY 2022-2023 FY 2023-2024 FY 2024-2025 EXPENSES DATE REMAIN FUNDING SOURCE 1 AIRCRAFT RESCUE& FIREFIGHTING TRUCK - 1,500,000 1,127,610 1,127,610 372,390 Airport 2 AIRFIELD 31L/13R REHABILITATION& AIRFIELD CONNECTOR -(DESIGN) - - - 1,500,000 - - 1,500,000 Airport ACIP Grant 3 AIRFIELD W & Al - (CONSTRUCT- PHASE 1) - - - 6,500,000 - - 6,500,000 Airport / ACIP / BIL-AIG Grant 4 AUTOMATED EXIT LANES - - - 750,000 - - 750,000 Airport 5 AUTOMATED VEHICLE IDENTIFICATION 300,000 - - - 276,384 276,384 23,616 Airport 6 BHS- TERMINAL BUILDING EXPANSION(CONSTRUCT) - - - 25,000,000 - - 25,000,000 PFC 7 CARPET REPLACEMENT- MAIN TERMINAL LOBBY AND SECURITY CHECK POINT - - 400,000 - - - 400,000 Airport 8 COMMON USE 225,860 2,777,514 - - 1,322,121 2,217,443 785,931 Airport 9 CONSOLIDATED RENTALCAR FACILITY(DESIGN) - - - 2,500,000 - - 2,500,000 CFC 10 CONVEYANCE REPLACEMENT - - - 4,700,000 - - 4,700,000 Airport / BIL-ATP Grant 11 ECONOMY LOT (CONSTRUCT) - PHASE 1 - - - 3,000,000 - 30,677 2,969,323 Airport 12 ECONOMY LOT (CONSTRUCT) - PHASE 2 - - - 3,000,000 - - 3,000,000 Airport 13 ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) CHARGERS - - 300,000 - 295,708 295,708 4,292 Airport/ACIP 14 FEDERAL INSPECTION STATION - (DESIGN) & NEW TERMINAL EXPANSION - - - 19,000,000 - 120,878 18,879,122 Airport/ BIL- Entitlement Grant 15 GATE STRIPING - - 599,900 - 599,900 599,900 - Airport 16 HOT SPOT STUDY - - 181,320 - 53,283 53,283 128,037 Airport/ACIP 17 HVAC INFRASTRUCTURE REPLACEMENT - - - 2,000,000 - 6,209 1,993,791 Airport/BIL-ATP Grant 18 INBOUND BAGGAGE CLAIM - - 6,000,000 12,000,000 326,915 505,992 17,494,008 Airport/BIL-ATP Grant 19 LED RIBBON - - - - (3,000) 3,000 Airport 20 LOT A(CONSTRUCT) - - - 700,000 - - 700,000 Airport 21 MAIN TERMINAL FACADE RESTORATION (DESIGN) - - - 500,000 - - 500,000 Airport 22 MASTER PLAN - - 2,275,816 - 680,937 931,540 1,344,276 Airport/ACIP 23 OUTBOUND BAGGAGE HANDLING SYSTEM - - 20,000,000 10,000,000 540,106 646,762 29,353,238 Airport/ACIP/PFC 24 PAINT STRIPING TRUCK - - 1,000,000 - - - 1,000,000 Airport 25 PARKING REVENUE SYSTEM - - 500,000 - - - 500,000 Airport 26 PRIOR YEAR PROJECTS 29,205,802 - - - - - 29,205,802 27 PROCURE LANDSIDE VEHICLES - - 210,000 - - 67,772 142,228 Airport/VALE/ZEV Grant 28 PROCURE TWO ZERO EMISSIONS BUSES - - - 2,000,000 - - 2,000,000 Airport/VALE/ZEV Grant 29 PROPERTY ACQUISITION - - 8,800,000 - - - 8,800,000 CFC 30 PUBLIC PARKING PAVING - - 2,400,000 - 1,523 4,604 2,395,396 Airport 31 PUBLIC RESTROOMS - - 10,000,000 - 29,028 89,817 9,910,183 Airport/BIL-ATP Grant 32 REMAIN OVER NIGHT (RON) PARKING SPACES - - - 4,000,000 - - 4,000,000 Airport/ ACIP Grant 33 SHADE AREA - PHASE 1 - - 236,000 - - 148,209 87,791 Airport / VGPS Grant 34 SOLID SEPARATOR - - 100,000 - - - 100,000 Airport 35 TAXIWAY REHABILIATION W & Al - - 571,158 - 53,394 88,644 482,515 Airport/ACIP 36 TELEHANDLER/FORKLIFT - - 150,000 - - 373,469 (223,469) Airport 37 VERBIAGE MESSAGE SIGNAGE - DIGITAL - - 800,000 - - - 800,000 Airport 38 WI-FI CONSULTANT (DESIGN) - - 150,000 - - - 150,000 Airport 39 WIFI WIRELESS EQUIPMENT - - 500,000 - 5,474 405,933 94,067 Airport 40 WILDLIFE HAZARD ASSESSEMENT - - 126,924 - 15,044 41,557 85,367 Airport/ACIP 41 Z-SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS CONSULTANT 73,632 - Airport TOTAL 29,731,662 2,777,514 53,724,194 98,650,000 5,306,909 7,711,403 177,301,470 Item 9.J 1189/2/2024 Page 11 of 11 PSP Concession Projected Opening Dates 1 Nine Cities- complete 2 Hey Joshua- complete 3 Las Palmas Oasis- complete 4 InMotion 5 Cactus to Clouds 6 Las Casuelas & Coachella Valley Coffee 7 Uptown Essentials 8 The Pink Door 9 Vino Volo 10 1 Trio 111 Coachella Duty Free Cart 12 Movie Colony Canteen 5/3 5/3 7/ 19 8/16 8/23 10/10 10/10 D� D� D� 12/20 12/26 2/28 3/28 Palm Springs International Airport Tue 7/2/24 1190 Item 91 ITEM 12.A - PAST CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS Airport Commission Meeting of July 10, 2024 City Council Meeting of June 27, 2024: There were no City Council items related to the Airport. I T E M 12.A Page 1 1 1 1191 ITEM 12.13 - FUTURE CITY COUNCIL ACTIONS Airport Commission Meeting of July 10, 2024 July 9, 2024 • Amendment to Car Rental Concessionaire Agreements to adjust certain fixed rent charges and reinstate the Minimum Annual Guarantee (MAG). • Southern California Edison/Hertz Rental Car Grant Easement. • Taxiway Rehabilitation Project July 25, 2024 • ABM Aviation, Inc. - Amendment No. 3 to extend parking management services for one-year. • Signature Technologies Inc. dba Com-Net Software —Amendment No. 2 to extend Flight Information Display System (FIDS) services for one-year. I T E M 12.B 7-10 -24 Page 1 11 1192 ITEM 14.A - FUTURE COMMITTEE MEETINGS Airport Commission Meeting of July 10, 2024 Date Time Committee July 10, 2024 5:00 pm Noise Committee July TBD TBD Marketing and Business Development Committee TBD TBD Ad Hoc Design Review Committee TBD TBD Budget and Finance Committee TBD TBD Operations, Properties and Facilities Committee ITEM 14.A / 7-10-24 Page 1 1 1 1193 AIRPORT COMMITTEES FY2023-24 REVISED 1-11-24 REPRESENTING COMMISSIONERS Marketing (7 Members)* Budget (7 Members)* Operations (7 Members) Noise (5 Members) Ad Hoc Design Review (5 Members)* Indian Wells BERRIMAN, Robert Member Palm Springs BURKE, Todd Chair Member Member Palm Springs CALDWELL, Daniel Member Member Palm Springs CORCORAN, Kevin Member Member Chair Palm Springs FELTMAN, David Chair Member Palm Springs FONG, J Craig Member Member Palm Springs MARTIN, Tracy Chair Riverside County PARK, Margaret Member Desert Hot Springs PYE, Jan Member Member Palm Desert WISEMAN, Kevin Member Member Member Member Indio WISE, Rick Member Member Rancho Mirage YOUNG, Keith Member Member * Ad Hoc Design Review Committee has one (1) vacancy Budget & Finance Committee has two (2) vacancies Marketing & Business Development Committee has two (2) vacancies Noise Committee has one (1) vacancy AIRPORT MASTER PLAN WORKING GROUP REVISED 1-19-24 REPRESENTING COMMISSIONERS Palm Springs CORCORAN, Kevin Palm Springs DADA, Aftab Palm Desert WISEMAN, Kevin Rancho Mirage YOUNG, Keith ITEM 14.13 1194 Palm Springs Airport Commission Report — July 10, 2024 Meeting Discussion and Action Items: Palm Springs Air Museum Lease Extension — Museum Director Fred Bell gave a presentation on the Air Museum and the need for a 10-year extension of the current lease which is set to expire in November, 2035. This extension will support a $3.5 million expansion and remodel of the museum's front entry area, adding 4,000 square feet of new floor space and making significant improvements. The estimated annual economic impact of the Museum to our region is approximately $35 million. The Commission recommended to Council to approve the extension with various CPI adjustments on the rent and fees owed to the City. Agreement Amendment with Mead & Hunt Inc for Professional Consulting Services for the Comprehensive Airport Master Plan —The amendment would extend the agreement through July, 2026. This will help assist with various parking and facilities configuration issues, options and impacts. Council is still debating the location and composition of the new rental car facility. Two locations being considered for the Consolidated Rental Car Facility (CONRAQ (1) Near the main terminal (including the space where the USO and Pond hangar are now), requiring one or two floors to be constructed underground; or (2) On the south portion of the airport property, using shuttles (and possibly underground tunnels) to transport passengers and staff to and from the main facility. Parking Rate Analysis — A study was presented comparing the Palm Springs Airport parking rate structure to competing airports in Southern California. The current daily rate of $20 was implemented in 2018. The study indicated an inflation -based adjustment would be $26 per day, and recommended a $24 daily rate. After a lengthy discussion, the Commission approved a recommendation to the Council for the City to increase the daily rate to $26 per day. The Finance Manager indicated she planned to begin having the rate study updating every two years, followed by bringing rate recommendations to the Council. I suggested that even though they plan to update the study every two years, it would be better to take an inflation -based rate recommendation in the first year, thus avoiding further spikes in rate increases. This idea was well received. If the $26 rate is approved by Council, then it is projected to bring in an additional $1.5 million annually. Outbound Baggage Handling System Update — The new design is expected to be completed in August for presentation to the TSA for their comment period. Getting power from the Cogen plant across the street on the City Hall site to the airport is part of this consideration. The project is being sized to handle the expected growth in airport activity over the next 15 years. A temporary facility is expected to be needed for around nine months. Measure J (1% tax) and Measure D (1/2% tax) Sales Tax Update — In 2015, the FAA issued a regulation requiring that sales taxes generated from special sales taxes on airline fuel sales be set aside for airport specific expenditures. In 2017, the City's planned process for identifying and segregating these revenues was implemented by the City's Finance Department. The current Director of Finance & Treasurer reported that he had just recently come to understand this process which is generating about $750,000 annually, and has generated over $4 million since 2017. Executive Director Harry Barrett, Jr. was unable to attend the meeting, so a few discussion items were not presented or were just briefly mentioned. 1195 Next Commission Meeting: an all -day special meeting and study session on September 12, 2024, from 9 AM to 5 PM. The Commission will be dark in August. Note: On July 11, 2024, 1 attended a two-hour meeting on Open Meetings Law and the Brown Act for new and existing City of Palm Springs Commissioners as required by State Law. It was presented by City Attorney Jeff Ballinger, and attended by the City Clerk and staff, and introductory remarks were made by Mayor Jeffrey Bernstein and City Manager Scott Stiles. Also, I will be meeting with Harry Barrett on August 6t" at the airport at 2 PM to help bring me up to speed on various issues. 1196 WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 6, 2024 CITY COUNCIL MEETING -AUGUST 6, 2024 -WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ARLENE GOTSHALK MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - EMERGENCY RESPONSE WEBSITE AND DESIGNATED SPOKESPERSON From: Arlene Gotshalk <agotshalk@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 4, 2024 2:17 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS for City council Meeting August 6, 2024 Attachments: Emergency response website - public speak at council meeting.docx; Request to Speak Form 8-6-24.pdf Arlene Gotshalk Residence: La Quinta Subject matter: Emergency Response Website and Designated Spokesperson Please distribute my written comments to Council and incorporate them into the public record of the meeting. Also attached is my "Request to Speak" form. Thank you. Arlene "You can't wait until life isn't hard anymore before you decide to be happy." Nightbird Arlene Gotshalk CareGiving Toolkit www.caregivingtoolkit.com 831-588-3373 agotshalk(a)gmail.com 1 RE: EMERGENCY RESPONSE WEBSITE & DESIGNATED SPOKESPERSON One of the many challenges of disaster management is making sure that centralized information is available in a timely manner. Currently, there is a lot of mixed information circulating in our community through different delivery systems. Each person has to find these sources of information. There is City Email Alerts along with local groups such as Next Door, La Quinta News, etc.. The result is conflicting, limited, and outdated information.. You have to: • Know that these avenues of information exist! • Find them • Sign up for each one of them • Hope the information is correct. This maze of information is confusing, time-consuming, and difficult to navigate. And not all information is useful. Rural Health Information Hub states: "The primary audience for dissemination of disaster information is typically the local community affected by the emergency or disaster event. Disseminating information centrally ensures transparency with the community. Central information keeps individuals and organizations informed of preparedness, response, and recovery efforts." MY RECOMMENDATIONS ARE: 1. CREATE ACCESS TO A CENTRAL WEBSITE. A one -stop shop with real-time natural disaster information. The website would include time -stamped updates and reliable links with warnings about current, real-time dangers/damages such as: • Evacuation orders • Rising river levels • Power outages • Available resources (including reliable social media accounts) • Volunteer requests • Whether water is safe to drink • Which roads are safe to be on C:\Users\mradeva\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\TD4G8EXV\Emergency response website - public speak at council meeting.docx For example: Preparation and Response information during Tropical Storm Hilary could not be found in one location and was not always accurate or updated which led to fear, chaos, confusion, congestion, and potential danger. When supplies of sand and sandbags ran out at fire stations, nobody seems to know if or when the supplies were going to be replenished — not the people manning the fire stations or the citizens looking for sand and sandbags. People were scared and angry and raced from one fire station to another wondering if they would be able to find some supplies. Different information was circulating about where to find supplies and a significant time lag occurred before information became available. A centrally posted update of available supplies would have eliminated misunderstandings and frustration. It cuts through the clutter of all the information surrounding the emergency and offers time -saving solutions, rock -solid advice. 2. DESIGNATE A SPOKESPERSON to present daily live updates like the coordinated briefings made by Cal Fire Spokesperson during disasters. The briefings transcripts could be broadcasted live by the City Spokesperson at the same time (or times) every day on the radio, TV and on City Disaster website, etc. This type of communication and transparency would create a shared understanding and reduce misinformation. It builds trust and offers hope as the chaos unfolds. The Spokesperson could take questions during these live broadcasts and post answers in real-time on the website. Questions could be emailed in and answers could be posted. By adopting a "simple" approach to complex problems and concentrating on which information is most useful, we can achieve clarity of communication and improve immediate responses. A central website will help simplify information to help us take focused actions during pressing challenges. Effective communication saves lives and is a critical component of emergency management. Having ACCESS TO A CENTRAL WEBSITE AND A DESIGNATED SPOKESPERSON will keep our community on the same page and unite us with trustworthy, real-time information. I hope you and your team will create a CENTRAL WEBSITE AND DESIGNATE A SPOKESPERSON to make it more effective to help the people and the community we love. C:\Users\mradeva\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\TD4G8EXV\Emergency response website - public speak at council meeting.docx CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 6, 2024 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT DAVID HECKMAN CLOSED SESSION ITEM NO. 2 - TALUS (FORMERLY SILVERROCK RESORT) - COMMENTS REGARDING DEVELOPER From: Dave Heckman <daveheckman716@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 2:49 PM To: Jennifer Nelson <jnelson@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Green/Talus mess You don't often get email from daveheckman716@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Dear MS. Nelson, I'm writing this to you because the email address to Deborah McGarrey will not open, so as per your instructions I'm sending this to you to forward to her before tonight's council meeting.. To: Deborah McGarrey I'm writing to you to demand a Grand Jury investigation into this fraudulent bankruptcy filed by Robert Green and his various Companies who are trying to avoid criminal prosecution for his actions and dealings with our City and other businesses throughout the Coachella Valley.. Isn't time for the City to stop doing business with a crook and thief? This should be time for you to stop the fraud. Sincerely, David Heckman CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 6, 2024 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ALENA CALLIMANIS PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE - COMMENTS REGARDING PROPOSED ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS From: Alena Callimanis <acallimanis@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 9:32 PM To: Linda Evans; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Deborah McGarrey; John Pena; Steve Sanchez Cc: Monika Radeva; Cheri Flores Subject: City Council members - YouTube video links to Jefferson St Extension and also Avenue 62 dike Travertine hearing Good day. I hope this will be helpful to you. I am attaching a YouTube link that shows a drive of one mile of the Jefferson Street Extension. The file below shows where the trip started. It is the one circle with a black border. The significant things I would like to point out is that it is pretty flat, it can be to the east more to get further away from the Quarry wall, and the road already is below the Quarry wall and could be graded even lower if need be. There is no dike to cross until you are far from the Quarry. The first dike is at the end of the one mile trip and it is significantly smaller. And far from everyone. The drive went from the one circle with black around it, to the other circle where it says 1.01. https://youtu.be/2UKPt9gFQU8 r � � i 5 ' At This second video is taken climbing up the Avenue 62 roadway to the top of the dike. Then you can see the irrigation ponds, back down Avenue 62, the duct tape that shows the bottom of the roadway which is 6 feet above the dike. Above the 6 foot mark, the vehicles (discounting motorcycles) can typically be 5 feet high to 13.5 feet hight. And of course you can see Trilogy residences. Keep in mind, where I am taking this video is below the 6 foot elevated roadway, https://youtu.be/oZgU9JnQb2s Alena Callimanis 81469 Rustic Canyon Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 919 606-6164 acallimanis@gmail.com CITY COUNCIL MEETING -AUGUST 6, 2024 -WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY GRETCHEN GUTIERREZ CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF DVBA - PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE - LETTER IN SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT From: Gretchen Gutierrez <gg@thedvba.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 12:37 PM To: Monika Radeva Subject: Item for Council Meeting Attachments: doc03230020240806123005.pdf Hi Monika, Comment letter for tonight's council meeting... Supportive of Jobs and Economic Development for the City. Please include that in the staff/council notes letter is written to encourage projects hire local and spend local. gretchen Gretchen Gutierrez CEO DVBA 34360 Gateway Drive Palm Desert, CA 92211 760-776-7001 office 661-478-3762 cell email: gg@thedvba.org website: www.TheDVBA.org A NAHKI National Association desert valleys builders association of Home Builders From: gretchen.gutierrez66@gmail.com<gretchen.gutierrez66@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 12:30 PM To: Gretchen Gutierrez <gg@thedvba.org> Subject: ------------------- do not reply ------------------- 1 2024 BOARD OF DIRECTORS PRESIDENT Paul Mahoney, PMA Advertising Immediate Past President Todd Hooks- Presidents Council I S' VICE PRESIDENT Tom Dubose Dubose Design Group, Inc. SECRETARY/TREASURER Pedro Rincon Osborne Rincon CPAs VICE PRESIDENT OFASSOCL4TES Allan Levin Allan Levin & Associates CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Gretchen Gutierrez DIRECTORS Fred Bell/2024 PAC Chairman Nobell Energy Solutions Brian Benedetti Brian Benedetti Construction Mark Benedetti Cheryl Gonzales, GHA Companies Mario Gonzales — Presidents Council GHA Companies Joe Hayes — Presidents Council Jeremy Roos Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians Dave Lippert Lippert Constriction, Inc Bruce Maize Orr Builders Russ Martin Mission Springs Water District Alan Pace Petra GeoSciences John Powell, Jr. Coachella Valley Water District Phil Smith —Presidents Council Sunrise Company Alissa Vatter Fidelity National Title Jeff Wattenbarger — Presidents Council Wattenbarger Construction Michelle Witherspoon MSA Consulting ;0's8A �` 1 desert valleys builders association March 3, 2022 City of La Quinta 78494 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Travertine To City of La Quinta: On behalf of the Desert Valleys Builders Association (DVBA), representing nearly 150 companies within the construction and development industries, we are supportive of entities that hire local, provide quality community amenities, along with providing the opportunity of homeownership to those seeking residency in La Quinta. This project will provide housing, along with other lifestyle & community amenities that the residents of the City of La Quinta can enjoy. This new community will be creating much needed jobs, both temporary and permanent, that will assist with economic benefits to the City. Additional benefits to the community —such as sales tax & local purchase revenues, along with other types of financial spending will also provide positive economic assistance to the City. G rel CEO i Valleys Builders Association 34360 Gateway Drive i Palm Desert • CA 92211 (760) 776-7001 office • (760) 776-7002 fax www.TheDVBA.org CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 6, 2024 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JOHN MILLER PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE - OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT From: John K. Miller <jkmillergroup@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 4, 2024 10:03 AM To: Linda Evans; John Pena; Kathleen Fitzpatrick; Deborah McGarrey; Steve Sanchez; City Clerk Mail Subject: Written Comments - John Miller, La Quinta, Travertine Development Dear Madam Mayor and Council Members, I am John Miller, and I own 81455 Golden Poppy Way in Trilogy La Quinta. I have lived in La Quinta for over 24 years and am happy to call it my home. As a Realtor, I have represented over 1,300 clients over the past 21 years, most of whom chose Trilogy La Quinta for its remote, peaceful, and tranquil location backing up to the Santa Rosa Mountains. I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed 1200-home Travertine development, particularly the planned primary arterial access routed through Avenue 62. As a resident and community advocate, I have several significant concerns about this development's adverse impacts on our area. Firstly, the proposed bridge over the existing dike on Avenue 62 to facilitate access to Travertine will dramatically increase noise and traffic throughout our community. This surge in traffic will result in higher emissions and greenhouse gases, which is counterproductive to our collective efforts to reduce our environmental footprint and combat climate change. The influx of vehicles will contribute to air pollution, negatively impacting the health and well-being of current residents. Moreover, the noise generated by the increased traffic, mainly from vehicles crossing the newly constructed bridge, will disrupt the tranquility of our neighborhood. The residents of Trilogy La Quinta chose this community for its peaceful environment, and introducing this development will undermine the quality of life we currently enjoy. The constant noise pollution will be a source of stress and discomfort for many residents, especially those closest to Avenue 62. Another critical concern is the potential impact on the local wildlife, specifically the Bighorn sheep that inhabit this region. The construction and increased human activity will likely disturb their natural habitat, threatening survival. Protecting our local wildlife is essential, and the proposed development poses a significant risk to these animals. Additionally, the infrastructure in our area may need to be equipped to handle the substantial increase in traffic and population density. The strain on local roads, public services, and amenities could lead to congestion and reduced service quality, further diminishing the living standards for current and future residents. In conclusion, I strongly urge the city council to reconsider the access plan for the Travertine development. Routing the main arterial through Avenue 62 is not sustainable or community -friendly recommend exploring alternative access points that will minimize the environmental impact, preserve the peace of existing neighborhoods, and protect our local wildlife. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that the city council will take these concerns seriously and decide to prioritize the well-being of current residents and the environment. Sincerely, John K Miller John K. Miller I President Trilogy Onsite Sales Office, 60750 Trilogy Parkway, La Quinta, CA 92253 BD Luxe Office, 47350 Washington Street, Suite 101, La Quinta, CA 92253 JOHN KMJLLEP, PREMIER REAL ESTATE GROUP Cell: 760.285.3642 1 Fax: 877.251.4775 1 Office: 760.564.3161 Email: JKMiIIerGroup angmail.com I CalDRE: 01371356 Website: www.JohnKevinMiller.com CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 6, 2024 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY MITCHELL TSAI LAW FIRM PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE - OPPOSED TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT From: Christina Clifton <christina@mitchtsailaw.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 11:53 AM To: City Clerk Mail; Cheri Flores Cc: Mitchell M. Tsai Attorney at Law, P.C.; Jeremy Herwitt Subject: WSRCC - [City of La Quinta, Travertine Specific Plan] - Comment Letter Attachments: 20240806_WSRCC_La Quinta_TravertineSP_CCMeeting_FEIR_CL_Signed.pdf EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Some people who received this message don't often get email from christina@mitchtsailaw.com. Learn why this is important Good morning, Attached please find a comment letter our office is submitting for the Travertine Specific Plan Project (SCH#: 2018011023). The project will be heard by the City Council at today's meeting, agenda item #2. Please let me know if you have any questions. We would greatly appreciate confirmation of receipt of this email and its attachment. Thank you, Christina Christina Clifton, Paralegal Mitchell M. Tsai Law Firm - Environmental & Land Use Litigation 139 South Hudson Avenue Suite 200 Pasadena, CA 91101 Phone: (626) 314-3821 Fax: (626) 389-5414 Email: christina(a)mitchtsailaw.com Website: https://www.mitchtsailaw.com CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail transmission, and any documents, files or previous e-mail messages accompanying it, may contain confidential information that is legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of any of the information contained in or attached to this message is STRICTLY PROHIBITED and mayviolate applicable laws including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately notify us by reply e-mail at christina@mitchtsailaw.com or by telephone at (626) 314-3821 and destroy the original transmission and its attachments without reading them or saving them to disk. Thankyou. L% P: (626) 314-3821 139 South Hudson Avenue F: (626) 389-5414 Mitchell M. Tsai Suite 200 E: info@mitchtsailaw.com Law Firm Pasadena, California 91101 VIA E-MAIL August 6, 2024 Mayor Linda Evans La Quinta City Council City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Em: levans &lacluinta.gov Em: CityClerkMail(&JagTgov Em: clflores&lag�gov RE: City Council Public Hearing Agenda Item No. 2 - Travertine Specific Plan Project, Draft & Final Environmental Impact Report [SCH 2O180110231 Dear Mayor Evans, Honorable Councilmembers and Ms. Flores, On behalf of the Western States Regional Council of Carpenters ("Western States Carpenters" or "WSRCC"), our firm is submitting these comments to the City of La Quinta ("City") in connection August 6, 2024 City Council hearing regarding the Travertine Specific Plan Project ("Project"), as well as the Draft Environmental Impact Report ("DEIR") and Final Environmental Impact Report ("FEIR"; collectively, "EIR") associated therewith. The Project includes development of a mix of uses including up to 1,200 dwelling units of varying residential product types and two community parks (east and west) on 378.8 acres; a 38.3-acre resort/spa facility with a 45,000-square-foot boutique hotel with a 175-seat restaurant, 97,500 square feet of resort villas, and 8,700 square feet of spa and wellness center, as well as yoga and tennis courts; a 46.2-acre resort/golf facility with a 5,500-square-foot golf academy, a 1,000-square-foot clubhouse, and 10,000-square-foot banquet restaurant (500-seat capacity). The Western States Carpenters is a labor union representing over 90,000 union carpenters in 12 states, including California, and has a strong interest in well -ordered City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 2 of 28 land use planning and in addressing the environmental impacts of development projects. Individual members of the Western States Carpenters live, work, and recreate in the City and surrounding communities and would be directly affected by the Project's environmental impacts. The Western States Carpenters expressly reserves the right to supplement these comments at or prior to hearings on the Project, and at any later hearing and proceeding related to this Project. Gov. Code, § 65009, subd. (b); Pub. Res. Code, 21177, subd. (a); see Bakersfield CitiZensforLocal Control P. Bakersfield (2004) 124 Cal.AppAth 1184, 1199-1203; see also Galante Vineyards v. Monterey rater Dist. (1997) 60 Cal.AppAth 1109, 1121. The Western States Carpenters incorporates by reference all comments raising issues regarding the Environmental Impact Report (EIR) submitted prior to certification of the EIR for the Project. See Citizens for Clean Energy v City of iFloodland (2014) 225 Cal.AppAth 173, 191 (finding that any party who has objected to the project's environmental documentation may assert any issue timely raised by other parties). I. THE CITY'S FEIR FAILED TO RESPOND TO AND ADDRESS WSRCC'S COMMENTS REGARDING PROJECT'S DEIR. WSRCC has previously submitted written comments to the City concerning the Project's DEIR and the deficiencies therein on May 28, 2024, and June 25, 2024. Notwithstanding, the FEIR for the Project makes no mention of such comments and provides no response to them whatsoever, nor does it provide responses to any other written public comments concerning the DEIR that were received by the City after the close of the DEIR's 45-day comment period. WSRCC's prior comments also have not been included for the City Council's consideration as part of the City's Agenda Packet for the August 6, 2024, hearing on the Project (to which this correspondence is directed). Moreover, the resolution adopted by the Planning Commission at its June 25, 2024 hearing on the Project included the Planning Commission's recommendation to the City Council that the EIR for the Project be certified, but the Project's FEIR was not even considered by Planning Commission on that date because the FEIR had yet to be released. This apparent procedural sidestep sits in stark contrast to the procedure followed by the City in connection with its recent certification of the EIR in the Coral Mountain Resort project (for which the City's Planning Commission considered the City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 3 of 28 FEIR and adopted a resolution recommending its certification to the City Council), as well as undermines California's environmental review process and violates the CEQA. The CEQA Guidelines require the Lead Agency on a project to prepare a FEIR prior to approving a project. (CEQA Guidelines § 15089(a) — "The Lead Agency shall prepare a final EIR before approving the project.") The required contents of a FEIR are prescribed by CEQA Guidelines § 15132, which are as follows: (a) The draft EIR or a revision of the draft. (b) Comments and recommendations received on the draft EIR either verbatim or in summary. (c) A list of persons, organizations, and public agencies commenting on the draft EIR. (d) The responses of the Lead Agency to significant environmental points raised in the review and consultation process. (e) Any other information added by the Lead Agency. CEQA Guidelines § 15132. Here, as it stands, and based on the public comments (from WSRCC and others) regarding the Project and its DEIR that the City received regarding significant environmental points on the Project, the City will have violated CEQA if it continues its failure to respond to said public comments prior to proceeding with certification of the Project's EIR. Thus, absent revision and recirculation of a proper and complete FEIR for the Project, no certification of the EIR can permissibly occur. The City must remedy this procedural deficiency, and the City Council should not proceed with adopting any resolutions pertaining to the Project until this CEQA violation is cured. II. THE CITY SHOULD REQUIRE THE USE OF A LOCAL WORKFORCE TO BENEFIT THE COMMUNITY'S ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENT The City should require the Project to be built using a local workers who have graduated from a Joint Labor -Management Apprenticeship Program approved by the State of California, have at least as many hours of on-the-job experience in the applicable craft which would be required to graduate from such a state -approved apprenticeship training program, or who are registered apprentices in a state -approved apprenticeship training program. City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 4 of 28 Community benefits such as local hire can also be helpful to reduce environmental impacts and improve the positive economic impact of the Project. Local hire provisions requiring that a certain percentage of workers reside within 10 miles or less of the Project site can reduce the length of vendor trips, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and provide localized economic benefits. As environmental consultants Matt Hagemann and Paul E. Rosenfeld note: [A]ny local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction -related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site. March 8, 2021, SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling. Workforce requirements promote the development of skilled trades that yield sustainable economic development. As the California Workforce Development Board and the University of California, Berkeley Center for Labor Research and Education concluded: [L]abor should be considered an investment rather than a cost —and investments in growing, diversifying, and upskilling California's workforce can positively affect returns on climate mitigation efforts. In other words, well -trained workers are key to delivering emissions reductions and moving California closer to its climate targets.' Furthermore, workforce policies have significant environmental benefits given that they improve an area's jobs -housing balance, decreasing the amount and length of job commutes and the associated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. In fact, on May 7, 2021, the South Coast Air Quality Management District found that that the "[u]se of a local state -certified apprenticeship program" can result in air pollutant reductions.2 1 California Workforce Development Board (2020) Putting California on the High Road: A Jobs and Climate Action Plan for 2030 at p. ii, available at htips://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/ w�u-content/uploads /2020 /09 /Putting-California-on-the-High-Road.pdf. Z South Coast Air Quality Management District (May 7, 2021) Certify Final Environmental Assessment and Adopt Proposed Rule 2305 — Warehouse Indirect Source Rule — Warehouse Actions and Investments to Reduce Emissions Program, and Proposed Rule 316 — Fees for Rule 2305, Submit Rule 2305 for Inclusion Into the SIP, and Approve City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 5 of 28 Locating jobs closer to residential areas can have significant environmental benefits. As the California Planning Roundtable noted in 2008: People who live and work in the same jurisdiction would be more likely to take transit, walk, or bicycle to work than residents of less balanced communities and their vehicle trips would be shorter. Benefits would include potential reductions in both vehicle miles traveled and vehicle hours traveled.' Moreover, local hire mandates and skill -training are critical facets of a strategy to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT). As planning experts Robert Cervero and Michael Duncan have noted, simply placing jobs near housing stock is insufficient to achieve VMT reductions given that the skill requirements of available local jobs must match those held by local residents.4 Some municipalities have even tied local hire and other workforce policies to local development permits to address transportation issues. Cervero and Duncan note that: In nearly built -out Berkeley, CA, the approach to balancing jobs and housing is to create local jobs rather than to develop new housing. The city's First Source program encourages businesses to hire local residents, especially for entry- and intermediate -level jobs, and sponsors vocational training to ensure residents are employment -ready. While the program is voluntary, some 300 businesses have used it to date, placing more than 3,000 city residents in local jobs since it was launched in 1986. When needed, these carrots are matched by sticks, since the city is not shy about negotiating corporate participation in First Source as a condition of approval for development permits. Recently, the State of California verified its commitment towards workforce development through the Affordable Housing and High Road Jobs Act of 2022, Supporting Budget Actions, available athtip://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source /Agendas /Governing-Board/2021 /2021-May7-027.pdf?sfvrsn=10. s California Planning Roundtable (2008) Deconstructing Jobs -Housing Balance at p. 6, available at htips: / /cproundtable.org/static /media/uploads /publications /cpr-jobs- housing12df a Cervero, Robert and Duncan, Michael (2006) Which Reduces Vehicle Travel More: Jobs - Housing Balance or Retail -Housing Mixing? Journal of the American Planning Association 72 (4), 475-490, 482, available athtip://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/UTCT- 825.12df. City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 6 of 28 otherwise known as Assembly Bill No. 2011 ("AB2011"). AB2011 amended the Planning and Zoning Law to allow ministerial, by -right approval for projects being built alongside commercial corridors that meet affordability and labor requirements. The City should consider utilizing local workforce policies and requirements to benefit the local area economically and to mitigate greenhouse gas, improve air quality, and reduce transportation impacts. III. THE CITY SHOULD IMPOSE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT'S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT COMMUNITY SPREAD OF COVID-19 AND OTHER INFECTIOUS DISEASES Construction work has been defined as a Lower to High -risk activity for COVID-19 spread by the Occupations Safety and Health Administration. Recently, several construction sites have been identified as sources of community spread of COVID- 19.5 The Western States Carpenters recommend that the City adopt additional requirements to mitigate public health risks from the Project's construction activities. The Western States Carpenters requests that the City require safe on -site construction work practices as well as training and certification for any construction workers on the Project Site. In particular, based upon the Western States Carpenters' experience with safe construction site work practices, the Western States Carpenters recommends that the City require that while construction activities are being conducted at the Project Site: Construction Site Design: The Project Site will be limited to two controlled entry points. Entry points will have temperature screening technicians taking temperature readings when the entry point is open. 'Santa Clara County Public Health Qune 12, 2020) COVID-19 CASES AT CONSTRUCTION SITES HIGHLIGHT NEED FOR CONTINUED VIGILANCE IN SECTORS THAT HAVE REOPENED, available athtWs://www.sccgov.org/sites/ covidl 9 /Pages /press-release-06-12-2020-cases-at-construction-sites.aspx. City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 7 of 28 • The Temperature Screening Site Plan shows details regarding access to the Project Site and Project Site logistics for conducting temperature screening. • A 48-hour advance notice will be provided to all trades prior to the first day of temperature screening. • The perimeter fence directly adjacent to the entry points will be clearly marked indicating the appropriate 6-foot social distancing position for when you approach the screening area. Please reference the Apex temperature screening site map for additional details. • There will be clear signage posted at the project site directing you through temperature screening. • Provide hand washing stations throughout the construction site. Testing Procedures: • The temperature screening being used are non -contact devices. • Temperature readings will not be recorded. • Personnel will be screened upon entering the testing center and should only take 1-2 seconds per individual. • Hard hats, head coverings, sweat, dirt, sunscreen or any other cosmetics must be removed on the forehead before temperature screening. • Anyone who refuses to submit to a temperature screening or does not answer the health screening questions will be refused access to the Project Site. • Screening will be performed at both entrances from 5:30 am to 7:30 am.; main gate [ZONE 1] and personnel gate [ZONE 2] • After 7:30 am only the main gate entrance [ZONE 1] will continue to be used for temperature testing for anybody City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 8 of 28 gaining entry to the project site such as returning personnel, deliveries, and visitors. • If the digital thermometer displays a temperature reading above 100.0 degrees Fahrenheit, a second reading will be taken to verify an accurate reading. • If the second reading confirms an elevated temperature, DHS will instruct the individual that he/she will not be allowed to enter the Project Site. DHS will also instruct the individual to promptly notify his/her supervisor and his/her human resources (HR) representative and provide them with a copy of Annex A. Planning • Require the development of an Infectious Disease Preparedness and Response Plan that will include basic infection prevention measures (requiring the use of personal protection equipment), policies and procedures for prompt identification and isolation of sick individuals, social distancing (prohibiting gatherings of no more than 10 people including all -hands meetings and all -hands lunches) communication and training and workplace controls that meet standards that may be promulgated by the Center for Disease Control, Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Cal/OSHA, California Department of Public Health or applicable local public health agencies.' The United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Carpenters International Training Fund has developed COVID-19 Training and Certification to ensure that Carpenter union members and apprentices conduct safe work practices. The Agency should require that 6 See also The Center for Construction Research and Training, North America's Building Trades Unions (April 27 2020) NABTU and CPWR COVIC-19 Standards for U.S Constructions Sites, available athttps://www.cpwr.com/sites/default/files/NABTU CPWR Standards COVID-19.12df; Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (2020) Guidelines for Construction Sites During COVID-19 Pandemic, available at https://dpw.lacounty.gov/building-and-safety/docs/pw guidelines-construction-sites.pd£ City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 9 of 28 all construction workers undergo COVID-19 Training and Certification before being allowed to conduct construction activities at the Project Site. The Western States Carpenters has also developed a rigorous Infection Control Risk Assessment ("ICRA") training program to ensure it delivers a workforce that understands how to identify and control infection risks by implementing protocols to protect themselves and all others during renovation and construction projects in healthcare environments.' ICRA protocols are intended to contain pathogens, control airflow, and protect patients during the construction, maintenance and renovation of healthcare facilities. ICRA protocols prevent cross contamination, minimizing the risk of secondary infections in patients at hospital facilities. The City should require the Project to be built using a workforce trained in ICRA protocols. IV. THE CITY MUST REVISE AND RECIRCULATE THE EIR FOR THE PROJECT CEQA is a California statute designed to inform decision makers and the public about the potential, significant environmental effects of a project. 14 California Code of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines") § 15002(a)(1).' At its core, "[i]ts purpose is to inform the public and its responsible officials of the environmental consequences of their decisions before they are made." Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of Supervisors (1990) 52 Cal. 3d 553, 564. To achieve this purpose, CEQA mandates preparation of an Environmental Impact Report ("EIR") for projects so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed. Communities for a Better Environment P. Richmond (2010) For details concerning the Western States Carpenters' ICRA training program, see hLti2s://icrahealthcare.com/. 8 The CEQA Guidelines, codified in Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, section 15000 et seq, are regulatory guidelines promulgated by the state Natural Resources Agency for the implementation of CEQA. (Cal. Pub. Res. Code § 21083.) The CEQA Guidelines are given "great weight in interpreting CEQA except when ... clearly unauthorized or erroneous." Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wlildlife (2015) 62 Cal. 4th 204, 217. City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 10 of 28 184 Cal. App. 4th 70, 80. The EIR requirement "is the heart of CEQA." CEQA Guidelines, § 15003(a). The preparation and circulation of an EIR is more than a set of technical hurdles for agencies and developers to overcome. The EIR's function is to ensure that government officials who decide to build or approve a project do so with a full understanding of the environmental consequences and, equally important, that the public is assured those consequences have been considered. For the EIR to serve these goals it must present information so that the foreseeable impacts of pursuing the project can be understood and weighed, and the public must be given an adequate opportunity to comment on that presentation before the decision to go forward is made. Communities for a Better Environment P. Richmond (2010) 184 Cal. App. 4th 70, 80 (quoting Vineyard Area Citi.Zens for Responsible Growth, Inc. v. City of Rancbo Cordova (2007) 40 Cal. 4th 412, 449-450). Section 15088.5(a) of the CEQA Guidelines provides that an EIR must be recirculated whenever there is disclosure of significant new information. Significant new information includes: (1) disclosure of a new significant environmental impact resulting from the project or from a new proposed mitigation measure; (2) disclosure of a substantial increase in the severity of an environmental impact unless mitigation measures are adopted that reduce the impact to a level of insignificance; and (3) disclosure of a feasible project alternative or mitigation measure considerably different from others previously analyzed which would clearly lessen the significant environmental impacts of the project which the project proponents decline to adopt. Id. Additionally, an EIR must be recirculated when it is so fundamentally inadequate and conclusory in nature that meaningful public review and comment is precluded. Id. [citing Mountain Lion Coalition P. Fish & Game Com. (1989) 214 Cal.App.3d 1043]. Here, as discussed below, the DEIR fails to substantiate all of its conclusions to allow meaningful public review and comment, provide adequate mitigation measures, and fully assess all pertinent environmental factors. Accordingly, this comment letter discloses significant new information, necessitating revision and recirculation of the DEIR. City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 11 of 28 A. The DEIR's Alternatives Are Legally Inadequate An EIR must discuss a reasonable range of alternatives to the project, which "shall include those that could feasibly accomplish most of the basic objectives of the project and could avoid or substantially lessen one or more of the significant effects." CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6(a)&(c). "Rlhe discussion of alternatives shall focus on alternatives.... which are capable of avoiding or substantially lessening any significant effects of the project...." CEQA Guidelines § 15126.6(b). Further, an EIR is legally inadequate if it contains an overly narrow range of alternatives. ilatsonville Pilots Assn P. City of ilatsomille (2010) 183 Cal.App.4th 1059, 1087, 20190 [not considering a reduced development alternative was error] . Here, the DEIR considered a (1) no project alternative; (2) an originally approved specific plan alternative; and (3) a phase 1 only alternative. DEIR at 7-42. However, the DEIR notes that both build alternatives it considered would continue to result in similar or greater aesthetic, geology & soils, hazards & hazardous material, hydrology & water quality, land use planning, population & housing, public services, recreation, and utility impacts. Id. Accordingly, the DEIR fails to consider a reasonable range of alternatives which could eliminate or reduce the Project's significant impacts, as required. B. The DEIR's Mitigation Measures Are Insufficient A fundamental purpose of an EIR is to identify ways in which a proposed project's significant environmental impacts can be mitigated or avoided. Pub. Res. Code §§ 21002.1 (a), 21061. To implement this statutory purpose, an EIR must describe any feasible mitigation measures that can minimize the project's significant environmental effects. PRC §§ 21002.1 (a), 21100(b)(3); CEQA Guidelines §§ 15121(a), 15126.4(a). If the project has a significant effect on the environment, the agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has "eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible" PRC §§ 21002; 21002.1, 21081; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15091, 15092(b) (2) (A); and find that `specific overriding economic, legal, social, technology or other benefits of the project outweigh the significant effects on the environment." PRC §§ 21002; 21002.1, 21081; CEQA Guidelines §§ 15091, 15092(b)(2)(B). "A gloomy forecast of environmental degradation is of little or no value without pragmatic, concrete means to minimize the City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 12 of 28 impacts and restore ecological equilibrium." Environmental Council of Sacramento v. City of Sacramento (2006) 142 Cal.App.4th 1018, 1039. CEQA mitigation measures proposed and adopted are required to describe what actions will be taken to reduce or avoid an environmental impact. (CEQA Guidelines § 15126.4(a)(1)(B) [providing "[f]ormulation of mitigation measures should not be deferred until some future time.'].) While the same Guidelines section 15126.5(a)(1)(B) acknowledges an exception to the rule against deferrals, such exception is narrowly proscribed to situations where it is impractical or infeasible to include those details during the project's environmental review. According to CEQA Guidelines, "[w]hen an EIR has been prepared for a project, the Responsible Agency shall not approve the project as proposed if the agency finds any feasible alternative or feasible mitigation measures within its powers that would substantially lessen or avoid any significant effect the project would have on the environment." CEQA Guidelines Section 15096(g)(2). Here, the EIR's mitigation measures are improperly deferred or fail to adequately mitigate the Proj ect's impacts as follows: Biological Resources Although the EIR imposes 40 mitigation measures to mitigate the Project's biological resource impacts, several of the measures are insufficient. For example, mitigation measures BIO-26 and BI0-27 require pre -construction surveys solely for Le Conte thrashers and Burrowing Owls, despite the DEIR finding that the Project site may also contain black -tailed gnatcatcher (Polioptila caerulea), loggerhead shrike (Lanus ludovicianus), long-eared owl (Asio otus), osprey (Pandion haliaetus), and prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus). Compare DEIR at 1-20 —1-21 with 4.4-10. Thus, BIO-27 should be revised to require pre -construction nesting bird surveys for all nesting birds rather than just for Le Conte thrashers. Additionally, mitigation measure BIO-28, even as revised in the FEIR, defines the nesting season as February 1- August 31. Such a timeframe is inconsistent with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's ("CDFW") finding that certain species "commence nesting activities in January... and nest later than August 31 "' The nesting e See CDFW November 18, 2021 letter to City of Adelanto at 3, available at htips://files.ceqanet.ol2r.ca.gov/273819- City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 13 of 28 period on the mitigation measures should be revised to account for these findings. The measures also fail to specify that surveys should be consistent with CDFW protocols. Such specification is necessary to ensure that the measure, and surveys which it requires, are adequate. Absent such preparation and specifications, the measures are improperly deferred and cannot support the EIR's less than significant biological resource impact finding. Moreover, the Project would construct approximately 1,000 feet of the Jefferson Street roadway through and upon the Santa Rosa & San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area, which has been designated as "Critical Habitat" by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. No analysis is provided in the DEIR or FEIR as to if and how the Project intends to mitigate the associated impacts to the Conservation Area. Further still, as to the Project's cumulative impacts on biological resources, in conjunction with the development of the neighboring Coral Canyon project and the Resort at Coral Mountain project, the Project will completely cut off Coral Mountain (an undeveloped mountain area north of the Project site within the City limits that has been documented as supporting Peninsular Bighorn Sheep) from the aforementioned federal Conservation Area. The Project's EIR wholly ignores this impact and the associated habitat fragmentation that will result from the collective development of these three adjacent major development projects. To that end, additional study of the Project's cumulative impacts on biological resources is absolutely warranted. ii. Greenhouse Gas Emissions The DEIR finds that the Project greenhouse gas ("GHG") impacts will be significant and unavoidable. DEIR at 1-33. Thus, the EIR imposes several measures in attempt to mitigate such impacts, GHG-1 — GHG-10. GHG-2 provides that "[a]ll residences shall incorporate roof -top solar panels, in -home batteries and EV charger stations to facilitate use of EVs, golf carts and other low - speed electric vehicles (LSEVs)." DEIR at 1-33. However, the measure fails to specify any quantities or minimum coverage for the solar panels, batteries, and charger stations. 1 /attachment/zo76RgD7dUdj5BLJTEhEMdf74g6f100RrK NVBQSquhFFe510X53rLsbLSG MPRX"4AaYnJSTfZB6,JpY0 City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 14 of 28 Similarly, GHG-5 requires that "[a]ll non-residential components of the development where vehicle parking is provides shall also provide EV chargers" without in fact specifying any percentage of required chargers. DEIR at 1-34. Thus, the Project's EIR must be revised to provide such specification in the mitigation measures. Additionally, as stated in the Office of Planning Research's ("OPR") technical advisory in 2018: VMT and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reduction. Senate Bill 32 (Pavley, 2016) requires California to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, and Executive Order B-16-12 provides a target of 80 percent below 1990 emissions levels for the transportation sector by 2050. Despite the Project's clear GHG emissions impact in direct contravention of SB 32's GHG reduction goals, the EIR does not make an adequate effort to otherwise reduce the Project's GHG impacts through other specific project design features aimed at reducing GHG emissions. Moreover, the Project is not consistent with the CARB 2022 Scoping Plan. Indeed, the first action item in the Scoping Plan is reduce GHG emissions "40% below 1990 levels by 2030.`0 The CARB Scoping Plan also sets forth the action item that new residential and commercial buildings will have "[a]ll electric appliances beginning 2026 (residential) and 2029 (commercial), contributing to 6 million heat pumps installed statewide by 2030."11 Despite the clear path presented by the CARB Scoping Plan for reducing GHG emissions, the DEIR declines to hold the Project to that standard, and instead deflects its responsibility to mitigate significant GHG emissions impacts to the greatest degree possible, pursuant to CEQA's mandate. Indeed, it is the City's obligation, as lead agency, to ensure that the Project's environmental impacts have first been properly analyzed and then mitigated to a less than significant level wherever possible. WSRCC submits that the Project's implementation of the additional potential mitigation measures set forth below (where applicable), as delineated by the California Air Pollution Control Officers 10 California Air Resources Board 2022 Scoping Plan at p. 72; https: / /ww2.arb.ca.g,ov/sites /default/files /2023-04/2022-sp.bdf 11 Id. at p. 75 City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 15 of 28 Association's Quanting Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, would contribute toward the goal of reducing the Project's GHG emission impacts to the maximum extent possible: ErYerg Flange cif Effectiveness easure Grouped �eCategoryMeasurestrategy BVIP percent Reduction Number With in GHG Emissions Basis Buildings ema&d T-ltle 24 Ekilding ErlVelope Energy Fora 1Cr% imprawzmerm over 2009 Tille 24: BE-1 Efficiency Standards by X% HurrPoesidaudal ete€Wc-ity use: 0.2-5.5%: (X is equal to the percentage nauual -gas use: 0.7-10% Residential eledlricily use- 0.3-2.6%, natural imp rrovenwnt selcrled For the gas use: 7 5-4.1% ' FT L3E 2 install Programmable x BMP Thermostat Timers Ohda in Third -party HVAC U j qa SL-3 Commissioning and X BLA F3MP _ Verification of Energy Savings m BL-4 Install Energy Effrcient Residential b-,lding: 24% Appliance Electricity Appiiances Grocery SLUr{:s. 17-22% Use BL-5 Install Energy EfFcient Boilers 1.2•13-4% Fuel Use AL-1 Establish Gasite Renewable 0-100 Enu,gy S Wris-Ganaric AE_2 Establish Grisite Renewable 0-100% Energy Systems -Solar Powr%r AE-3 Establish Onsite Renewable 0-100% W -�, 12 Erwtqy System -Wind Power AE-4 UtilizoaComtmnedHaatand Q=��' ci «� C 0 Powar System AE_cu Establish Methane Recovery < in Landfills Establish Methano Recovery AE-6 in Waslewator Treatment Piants Outdoor LEA Install HighorEfficacy Public Lighting Streat and Area Lighting Electricity U) use LE-2 limit Cklj or Lighting 1' Requiramonts Raplace Traffic Lights with `^ Traffic Light Electric4 LED Traffic lights Use City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 16 of 28 s• 0 Range of Effectiveness Measure Grouped Category SkfY F�lw1f Percent Reduction With 4 in i;HG Emissions Basis LUT-1 Increase Dertsity 1.5-30.0% VM LU 1-2 Jncreaso Location Efficiency 10-65111G VM Increase D7iversity of Urban and LU 1-3 Suburban Developments (Mixed 9-30% VM a Use) ' LUT-4 Incr. destination Accessibility 63-20% VM J LU T -5 Increase Transit Accessibility U.5-24:6°/o VM 1 1 U T $ integrates Afforda6ie and Mow 0.04-1,20%, VM a Market Rate Housing LU 1 7 Orient Project Toward Flan -Auto NA J oradar LUT 8 Locate Project near Bike NA PathfBike Lane LUT-9 Improve De,iigl3 of Development 3.0-21.3% VM SDT-1 Provide Pedestrian Network 0-2% VMT Improvements SDT-2 Traffic Carming Wasuras D-25-1 DD° V T C CDT-3 Implinnem a NeighbDftmd 0.5-12,7"fo Vf T ❑ Electric Vahide (NEY) Network DT-4 {Urban Noa-Mmorized Zones DT-1 TVA OT-5 Incorporate Bike Lane Street LUT-9 NA Design (on -silo) DT-6 Provide Bike Par" in Ncm- LUT-9 OVA Residential Projects CDT-i Pr°'rda Bike Parking in M Iti- LUT-9 NA ' {Unix Residential Projects DT-9 Provide EV Parking DT-3 NA SDT-9 Dedicate Land for Bike Tra its LUT-9 NA PDT-1 Llmit Parking Supply 5-12.5% � Unbundle Parking CoSts frOrTr 2,6-139is CT)fDT-2 Property Cost i1 Implement Market Price � PDT-3 Public Barking (On•Street) -5'S RequIr+e Resldentiel Area PDT -I, PDT-4 NA Parking Permits 2 & 3 City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 17 of 28 TRT 1 Implement Voluntary CTR 1.0 G.2`5( C'.OmmLlte Program& VM 1 Implement Mandatory CommLite TRT-2 CTR Program& —Requited 4.2-21.0'Yo Irt7plerr�en�ti[rrr�Arfar7itoring VM 1 TF%T-3 Provide Ride-Shardng-159G Commute Programs VM 1 Implement Suhsidlzedor Commute TRT-4 ,3-2b, Discounted Transit Prog. VMT TRT-5 Provide End ofTrip TILT-1, 2 NA Facilitles & 3 F- Telecommuting and Commute TRT-6 Alternative Work 0-07-5-50% a Schedules VMT CL RT 7 I mplement Commute Trlp 0,8-q-0 commuLe Reduction Marketing VMT LJ � TRT- Implement Preferential TRT-1, 2 NA (Y Parking Permit Program & 3 TFi+T-5 Implement Car -haring 0,4-0` VM 1. Program RT 1Q Implement School Pool 7,2 15.8`Yo School PragI rant VMT �F2T 13 Provide Employer-Spomored 0,3-13,4°�6o Commute VanpooltShut#ic VM'1 TRT-12 Implement Bike -Sharing SDT-5, NA Progam LUT-9 TRT-13 Implement School finis 38-63`�'o Scd1ool PrWam VM 1 Commute i R1-14 Price Workpiace larking 0.1-19. 7'Yo VM 1 I R 115 Implcrrent Cmployee Parking `fL Commute "Cash -Out' ,6-7 VM 1 City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 18 of 28 �^ T T-1 Providc+a Bus Rapid Transit 0.02-3_Z90 VMT System €`� 1'l Implement Transit Access TT-3, NA irnprovernents T T-4 0 is],-3 Eland Transit Networl€ 0.1-8.2`lo VMT 1 T 4 kncrease 7ransit Senace 0.02 2_ °6 VMfi FrequencylSpeed TAT-5 Provide Bike Parking Near TT-3, NA Transit TT-4 1" T-6 Provide Local shct ties T T-I, NA TST-4 pf y irnplemantAm@orCordon 7_9-22.0% VM7 Pricing RPIT .2 1inprove Traffic Flaw 0-45 VMT €J Require Project Cantribudoaxs RPT = � RPT-3 to Transpoaatitm Infrastructuro NA CL CM improverna tProjocts TST•1 tob RPT• 1. � TRFZT-11, RPT-4 Insiall Park -and -Ride Lots T•3, NA T6T-1 to 6 Electrify Loading docks anti+ar Truck VT-1 Require Idling -Reduction 26-71% Systems idling Time VT-2 Utilize Alternative Fueled Varies Vehicles VT-3 Utilize Electric or Hyhdid 0.4-20.3% fuel Use Vehicles City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 19 of 28 Water Lange of Lffectiveness MeasureGrouped Category Strategy f3RNF' Percent Reductiori Number With # Bas°!l in GHG Emissions up to 40% Fur NDn ern 7S WSW-1 Usr, I`Zeclainned Water Ca,.rorniaup [a 81%far GgAd&x w8tor tiso CL Suuthain ad fomia CL El 0 W -Z UsD Gray Water G-100% iifi8tE�5c MO% for Nurthem anu 1V 3 Use Locally-SGurccd Watu Cerual Calikvnia: i d��nd Supply 11-7S% fur Southern Water Use Ca' forrua Rewderrlial: 20°Jf� WlitiN 1 Install Low Flow Water indoor Water Fixtures-Jw,-rzesiden[i�i:1 3i3G•: Use WLJ -2 Adopt a Water Cofiservation varies �, Strafe Li-3 design Water -Efficient �• fog, 0utdoar � Landscapes Water Use WUW-4 Usc Water-Efficie-at 1 % Ovtdoof Lamd-scape Irrigation Systems Water Lfse W UVV_r5 Reduce Turf in Landscapes varies and Lawns Plant NatiVe Or Drought- LAIN-$ Resistant Trocs and Valotation Area Land5capirig flange of Effectiveness Measure Grouped �ate�ory Strategy E3h+lf' Percent Reduction Number With # 6asds in GHG Emissions LAEfWP_ 2-5-46.5% PG&E: G4.1-80.M.. A-1 Prohibit Gas Powered SCE- 49.5-72.o4e Fuel Use Lafrd•scapc Equipmort. StiGE= 38.&-E6.39�, SMUD_ 56.3-7&0% A-2 BMP Impiemcrrt Lawnmower Exchange Program A-3 Electric Yard Eiuipment A-1 ar Compatibility A-2 City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 20 of 28 Glad Waste Range of Effecfiveness l�leasilre Grouped Category Strategy -DN11' Percent Reduction Number With # Basis in GHG Emissions SUhf-1 Irrstitutrr or Exwnd Recycling BMA ci andCornposting Services 0 � -� Recyelo Demolished BMP Construction Material Vegetation Range of Effectiveness alegory Measure tratrgy HMP Grouped Percent Reduction Number With in GHG Emissions Basis V-1 Urban Trot Planting GP-4 vanes - Create new vegetated open VafleS space. Construdon Range of Effectiveness Measure Grouped Category trat�g� �M� Percent fteductian Number vvkh # In GiAG Ernlssions Basis C-1 Uso ARamative Fuels for 0122% Fuel Utie Construction Equipment Use Electric and Hybrid 2.5 8L}`k� Fuel Use Construction Equipment Lima Construction Equipment 2 C-3 Idling beyond RLgulakion varies Rtquircmrnts {j C 4 Institute a Heavy -Duty Off- Any BMP RoadVDhidoan Pl I Implement a Vehicle Ittventory Tracking System City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 21 of 28 Miscellaneous Range of Effectiveness Measure Cat my trateg + , L aWith Grouped Percent Reduction Nur r 4 in GHG Emissions Basis Mlsc-1 Establishr a Carbon V t3e5 sequestration Pmmw Establlshorf-5iteIIVINation Vanes Mlsc-2 4Jso Laval and Sustainable x F3 M P M isc-3 Building Materials Require Best Management. ci Misc-4 Practices inAgriculwm and x f3MP Animal Operations Require Enlironmentally x BMP Responsible Purchasing Misc-$ rmploment an Innovative x BMP Stra for GHG Mi - ation General Plan Strategies Range of Effectiveness Measure Grouped a tegory �tratt�gy Bf�E Percent Reduction Number With # Basis In GHG Ernisslon5 Fund Encentives for Energy x amp P-' Effic" Establish a Local Farrnees X amp Markat E EG Establish Community GardefFs x BMP Plant Urban Shade Trees x V-1 BMP Implement Strategies to Reduce Urban Heat-island x BMP Effect (See Quantting Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Measures, Tables 6-1 to 6-9, California Air Pollution Control Officers Association (CAPCOA), August 2010.") It is entirely feasible for the EIR to incorporate a substantial proportion of the foregoing measures for the Project as mandatory forms of mitigation against the Project's significant and unavoidable greenhouse gas impacts. More is required, and as 12 Available at: http://www.agmd.gov/does/default-source/ceda/handbook/capcoa- uantif ng-greenhouse-gas-mitigation-measures.pdf City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 22 of 28 currently constituted, the EIR's improper analysis and lack of appropriate mitigation on GHG impacts violates CEQA. a Ha.Zards and Ha.Zardous Materials Mitigation measure HAZ-1, even after revision in the FEIR, requires that "Prior to grading, Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation shall be required. The Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation shall be conducted by an Environmental Professional as defined in Section 312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312." DEIR at 1-35; FEIR at 3-28. Thus, it appears as though no Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation has been conducted yet, absent any explanation as to why it is not feasible to do so at this time. Likewise, HAZ-8 requires that "[t]he Project shall consult an asbestos inspection consultant for a comprehensive asbestos survey prior to demolition of the project site", without indicating why such consultation is not feasible at this time. Deferring formulation of the actual mitigation measure to some undefined time after the Project's approval is improper and cannot be used as a mitigation measure. CEQA forbids deferred mitigation. Guidelines § 15126.4(a)(1)(B). CEQA allows deferral of details of a mitigation measure only "when it is impractical or infeasible to include those details during the project's environmental review." (Id.) CEQA further requires: "that the agency (1) commits itself to the mitigation, (2) adopts specific performance standards the mitigation will achieve, and (3) identifies the type(s) of potential action(s) that can feasibly achieve that performance standard..." Guidelines 15126.4(a)(1)(B). In the context of HAZ-1 and HAZ-8, the City has failed all of these preconditions and requirements, as the EIR has failed to show why a Limited Phase II Subsurface Investigation and/or an asbestos survey cannot be completed or achieved at this time prior to adoption of the EIR, what impacts the measures will have individually or cumulatively, if those would indeed be feasible, and the specific performance criteria the Applicant will have to meet with regard to the measures. Accordingly, the proposed mitigation measures are improperly deferred as it defers the formulation of components of the mitigation to a later time, shifts the burden to the Applicant, and further does not explain how the measures will clearly reduce the hazards impacts to a level of insignificance. City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 23 of 28 Absent such preparation or specification, the EIR's mitigation measures are improperly deferred. iv. Noise Mitigation measure NOI-5 provides that "[p]rior to water well drilling, the construction contractor shall provide a temporary 24-foot-high noise barrier capable of reducing noise during well construction activities to 80 dBA Leq or less." DEIR at 1-39. However, there is no indication that any such temporary noise barrier(s) will also be moveable to ensure it properly reduces the sound of the construction noise at its source. As noted by the court in AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LASC Case Number: 19STCP05445 (April 5, 2021): "The City's response actually concedes the flaw in the efficacy of MM 1- 2 as it is written. Effective mitigation to sensitive receptors requires the noise barrier systems to be moved. The City argues MM 1-2 is effective because `the noise barriers are moveable, meaning that they move in concert with any piece of construction equipment to ensure the equipment does not operate with an unobstructed line of sight to a receptor.' (Opposition Brief 35:15-17.) The City recognizes the barriers must be moveable `to shield construction activities, no matter where they occur onsite.' (Opposition Brief 35:18-19.) Despite the City's recognition the noise barriers must be moved throughout the Project during construction to effectively mitigate construction -related noise, MM 1-2 does not require such movement. It is not about wordsmithing-it is about enforceability and efficacy. The City's attempts to distinguish between `Project boundaries' and `property boundaries' is unpersuasive.24 Such a distinction -if there is one -does not resolve the ambiguity. Nothing in MM 1-2 requires any noise barriers to be moved. *25 Accordingly, the court finds substantial evidence does not support the City's conclusion MM 1-2 is an effective mitigation measure." (Exhibit D, p. 20 [Ruling] .) Absent such specifications, the mitigation measure is legally inadequate and cannot support a finding that the Project's noise impacts may be reduced to the level identified. City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 24 of 28 C. The DEIR Fails to Support its Findings on Land Use with Substantial Evidence Each California city and county must adopt a comprehensive, long-term general plan governing development. Napa Citizens for Honest Gov. P. Napa County Bd. of Supervisors (2001) 91 Cal.App.4th 342, 352, citing Gov. Code 55 65030, 65300. The general plan sits at the top of the land use planning hierarchy and serves as a "constitution" or "charter" for all future development. DeVita P. County of Napa (1995) 9 Ca1.4th 763, 773; Lesber Communications, Inc. P. City of ilalnut Creek (1990) 52 Cal.3d 531, 540. General plan consistency is "the linchpin of California's land use and development laws; it is the principle which infused the concept of planned growth with the force of law." Debottari P. Norco City Council (1985) 171 Cal.App.3d 1204, 1213. It is well established that development projects may not be approved if they interfere with, or frustrate, the general plan's policies and objectives. See Napa Citi.Zens, 91 Cal.App.4th at 378-79; see also Lesber, 52 Cal.3d at 544. Here, the EIR fails to analyze the consistency of the Project's requested entitlements with the General Plan and Specific Plan. Specifically, amongst other entitlements, the Project requires a general plan amendment, zone change, specific plan amendment, tentative parcel map, and development plan approval. DEIR at 1-4. However, rather than specifically analyzing the consistency of such departures from the plans, the DEIR merely presumes that such entitlements are consistent because they "do not represent a substantial change to the character of the area envisioned in the General Plan. DEIR at p. 4.11-27. Thus, the EIR's less than significant finding is unsupported and, for this reason too, the EIR must be revised and recirculated to conduct adequate consistency analysis for each individual entitlement requested. D. The DEIR's Hydrology and Water Quality Findings and Analysis Are Insufficient CEQA requires that an EIR identify and discuss the significant effects of a Project, how those significant effects can be mitigated or avoided. CEQA Guidelines 5 15126.2; PRC §§ 21100(b)(1), 21002.1(a). If a project has a significant effect on the environment, an agency may approve the project only upon finding that it has "eliminated or substantially lessened all significant effects on the environment where feasible" and that any unavoidable significant effects on the environment are "acceptable due to overriding concerns." CEQA Guidelines § 15092(b) (2) (A—B). Such City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 25 of 28 findings must be supported by substantial evidence. CEQA Guidelines § 15091(b). The DEIR at hand fails to comply with these requirements. Specifically, the DEIR provides that "[t]he proposed clearing, grading, and construction activities" have the potential to result in surface water quality impacts." DEIR at p. 4.10-20. Such impacts are of particular concern given that the Project site is within 700 feet of critical habitat for the federally endangered Peninsular bighorn sheep. Id. at p. 4.4-12. Nevertheless, rather than in fact assessing the severity and probability of potential construction related water quality impacts, the DEIR merely concludes that such impacts will be less than significant because the Project will be required to comply with Construction General Permit requirements and best management practices. Id. at p. 4.10-20. Such a blanket conclusion runs afoul to CEQA because it is well established that determinations that regulatory compliance will be sufficient to prevent significant adverse impacts must be based on a project - specific analysis of potential impacts and the effect of regulatory compliance. See Californians forAlternatives to Toxics P. Department of Food &Agric. (2005) 136 Cal. App. 4th 1; Ebbetts Pass Forest ilatcb v Department of Forestry & Fire Protection (2008) 43 Cal. App. 4th 936, 956. The EIR for the Project cannot rely upon regulatory compliance in making its less than significant impact determination without assessing and providing Project specific information and analysis as to its anticipated water quality impacts. E. The DEIR Fails to Adequately Analyze the Project's Cumulative Impacts. An EIR must discuss a cumulative impact if the project's incremental effect combined with the effects of other projects is "cumulatively considerable." 14 C.C.R. 515130(a). This determination is based on an assessment of the project's incremental effects "viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects." 14 C.C.R. §15065(a)(3); Banning Rancb Conservancy v City of Nenport Beach (2012) 211 CA4th 1209, 1228. See also 14 C.C.R. 515355(b). The CEQA Guidelines require that an EIR implement the provisions of Pub. Res. Code §21083 (b) (2), which specifies that the Guidelines must include criteria requiring public agencies to find that a project may have a significant effect on the environment if its possible effects "are individually limited but cumulatively considerable." City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 26 of 28 The purpose of the cumulative impacts analysis is to avoid considering projects in a vacuum, because failure to consider cumulative harm may risk environmental disaster. Wlhitman v Board of Supervisors (1979) 88 Cal.App.3d 397, 408 (citing Natural Resources Defense Council v Callaway (2d Cir 1975) 524 F2d 79). Without this analysis, piecemeal approval of several projects with related impacts could lead to severe environmental harm. Golden Door Props., LLC v County of San Diego (2020) 50 Cal.App.5th 467, 527; San Joaquin Raptorl Wildlife Rescue Or. v County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App.4th 713, 720; Las Virgenes Homeowners Fed'n v County of Los Angeles (1986) 177 Cal.App.3d 300, 306. An adequate analysis of cumulative impacts is particularly important when another related project might significantly worsen the project's adverse environmental impacts. Friends of the Eel River v Sonoma County WlaterAgency (2003) 108 CA4th 859. An EIR must discuss cumulative impacts when they are significant, and the project's incremental contribution is "cumulatively considerable." 14 C.C.R. §15130(a). A project's incremental contribution is cumulatively considerable if the incremental effects of the project are significant "when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects." 14 C.C.R. §15065(a)(3). Here, the DEIR for the Project already notes that the Project is anticipated to have significant and unavoidable impacts in the areas of Air Quality and GHG Emissions, and that, absent implementation of extensive mitigation measures, the Project would otherwise be anticipated have significant impacts in the areas of Aesthetics, Biological Resources, Cultural Resources, Geology and Soils, Hazards and Hazardous Materials, Hydrology and Water Quality, Noise, and Public Services. Despite the wide scope of significant impacts presented by the Project on its own, the DEIR and FEIR contain no reference or consideration whatsoever of two major development projects planned to be constructed adjacent to the Project site. The first is the Resort at Coral Mountain project, for which the City just certified an EIR on March 5, 2024, and which is due to be constructed less than a half mile from the Project's northeast edge. The Coral Mountain Resort project, as approved, will include development of 750 low -density residential units, a golf course, and 60,000 square feet of retail commercial construction, spanning 387 acres immediately northeast of Coral Mountain. The second adjacent project is the Coral Canyons project, in connection with which the City certified the Green Specific Plan on June 6, 1995, and later approved Tentative Tract Maps pursuant to adoption of a Mitigated City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 27 of 28 Negative Declaration. Coral Canyons, which is due to be constructed less than a half mile from the northwest edge of the Project, would consist of development of 219 single family lots on 317.61 acres directly west of Coral Mountain. The Jefferson Street roadway, on which the current Project is dependent for vehicular access and traffic flow, would necessarily run directly through the Coral Canyons project to the north. Upon completion of construction of the Project, and in conjunction with these assorted neighboring projects, the entirety of Coral Mountain will be surrounded on all sides by nearly 1,000 acres of new development, where there was otherwise previously no adjacent development to be found. It defies belief, and CEQA, that the DEIR and FEIR makes absolutely no mention (let alone discussion and analysis) of these two adjacent major development projects, both of which are further along in their respective planning processes, when considering the cumulative impacts that the Project will have within the City. Accordingly, the EIR must be revised and recirculated to consider and fully analyze the potential cumulative impacts presented by the Project in conjunction with the known development projects in its immediate vicinity. Absent doing so, the EIR will remain legally deficient, and any approval/certification of it in its current form will violate CEQA. V. CONCLUSION In sum, WSRCC requests that the City require a local workforce, that the City impose training requirements for the Project's construction activities to prevent community spread of COVID-19 and other infectious diseases, and that the City revise and recirculate the DEIR for the Project to address the aforementioned concerns. If the City has any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office. Sincerely, J y Herwitt Attorneys for Western States Regional Council of Carpenters City of La Quinta — Travertine Specific Plan Project August 6, 2024 Page 28 of 28 Attached: March 8, 2021 SWAPE Letter to Mitchell M. Tsai re Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling (Exhibit A); Air Quality and GHG Expert Paul Rosenfeld CV (Exhibit B); Air Quality and GHG Expert Matt Hagemann CV (Exhibit C); and AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, LASC Case Number: 19STCP05445 (April 5, 2021 Ruling) (Exhibit D). EXHIBIT A �SWAPE Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment 2656 29th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, CA 90405 Matt Hagemann, P.G, C.Hg. (949) 887-9013 mhagemann@swape.com Paul E. Rosenfeld, PhD (310) 795-2335 prosenfeld@swape.com March 8, 2021 Mitchell M. Tsai 155 South El Molino, Suite 104 Pasadena, CA 91101 Subject: Local Hire Requirements and Considerations for Greenhouse Gas Modeling Dear Mr. Tsai, Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise ("SWAPE") is pleased to provide the following draft technical report explaining the significance of worker trips required for construction of land use development projects with respect to the estimation of greenhouse gas ("GHG") emissions. The report will also discuss the potential for local hire requirements to reduce the length of worker trips, and consequently, reduced or mitigate the potential GHG impacts. Worker Trips and Greenhouse Gas Calculations The California Emissions Estimator Model ("CaIEEMod") is a "statewide land use emissions computer model designed to provide a uniform platform for government agencies, land use planners, and environmental professionals to quantify potential criteria pollutant and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with both construction and operations from a variety of land use projects."' CaIEEMod quantifies construction -related emissions associated with land use projects resulting from off -road construction equipment; on -road mobile equipment associated with workers, vendors, and hauling; fugitive dust associated with grading, demolition, truck loading, and on -road vehicles traveling along paved and unpaved roads; and architectural coating activities; and paving.2 The number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CaIEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on -road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.' 1 "California Emissions Estimator Model." CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/home. Z "California Emissions Estimator Model." CAPCOA, 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/caleemod/home. 3 "CaIEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 1 Specifically, the number and length of vehicle trips is utilized to estimate the vehicle miles travelled ("VMT") associated with construction. Then, utilizing vehicle -class specific EMFAC 2014 emission factors, CaIEEMod calculates the vehicle exhaust, evaporative, and dust emissions resulting from construction -related VMT, including personal vehicles for worker commuting.4 Specifically, in order to calculate VMT, CaIEEMod multiplies the average daily trip rate by the average overall trip length (see excerpt below): "VMTd = F(Average Daily Trip Rate i * Average Overall Trip Length 1) n Where: n = Number of land uses being modeled."' Furthermore, to calculate the on -road emissions associated with worker trips, CaIEEMod utilizes the following equation (see excerpt below): "EmisslonSpollutant = VMT * EFrunning,pollutant Where: Emissionspollutant = emissions from vehicle running for each pollutant VMT = vehicle miles traveled EFrunning,pollutant = emission factor for running emissions."' Thus, there is a direct relationship between trip length and VMT, as well as a direct relationship between VMT and vehicle running emissions. In other words, when the trip length is increased, the VMT and vehicle running emissions increase as a result. Thus, vehicle running emissions can be reduced by decreasing the average overall trip length, by way of a local hire requirement or otherwise. Default Worker Trip Parameters and Potential Local Hire Requirements As previously discussed, the number, length, and vehicle class of worker trips are utilized by CaIEEMod to calculate emissions associated with the on -road vehicle trips required to transport workers to and from the Project site during construction.' In order to understand how local hire requirements and associated worker trip length reductions impact GHG emissions calculations, it is important to consider the CaIEEMod default worker trip parameters. CalEEMod provides recommended default values based on site -specific information, such as land use type, meteorological data, total lot acreage, project type and typical equipment associated with project type. If more specific project information is known, the user can change the default values and input project - specific values, but the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") requires that such changes be justified by substantial evidence.' The default number of construction -related worker trips is calculated by multiplying the 4 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14-15. 5 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, P. 23. ' "Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 7 "CalEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. $ CalEEMod User Guide, available at: http://www.caleemod.com/, p. 1, 9. 2 number of pieces of equipment for all phases by 1.25, with the exception of worker trips required for the building construction and architectural coating phases.9 Furthermore, the worker trip vehicle class is a 50/25/25 percent mix of light duty autos, light duty truck class 1 and light duty truck class 2, respectively."10 Finally, the default worker trip length is consistent with the length of the operational home -to -work vehicle trips.11 The operational home -to -work vehicle trip lengths are: "[B]ased on the location and urbanization selected on the project characteristic screen. These values were supplied by the air districts or use a default average for the state. Each district (or county) also assigns trip lengths for urban and rural settings" (emphasis added)." Thus, the default worker trip length is based on the location and urbanization level selected by the User when modeling emissions. The below table shows the CaIEEMod default rural and urban worker trip lengths by air basin (see excerpt below and Attachment A).13 Worker Trip Length by Air Basin Air Basin Rural (miles) Urban (miles) Great Basin Valleys 16.8 10.8 Lake County 16.8 10.8 Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8 Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8 Mountain Counties 16.8 10.8 North Central Coast 17.1 12.3 North Coast 16.8 10.8 Northeast Plateau 16.8 10.8 Sacramento Valley 16.8 10.8 Salton Sea 14.6 11 San Diego 16.8 10.8 San Francisco Bay Area 10.8 10.8 San Joaquin Valley 16.8 10.8 South Central Coast 16.8 10.8 South Coast 19.8 14.7 Average 16.47 11.17 Minimum 10.80 10.80 Maximum 19.80 14.70 Range 9.00 3.90 9 "CaIEEMod User's Guide." CAPCOA, November 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/01 user-39-s-guide2016-3-2 15november2017.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. 34. 10 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 15. 11 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 14. 12 "Appendix A Calculation Details for CaIEEMod." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/caleemod/02 appendix-a2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=6, p. 21. 13 "Appendix D Default Data Tables." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05 appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-84 - D-86. 3 As demonstrated above, default rural worker trip lengths for air basins in California vary from 10.8- to 19.8- miles, with an average of 16.47 miles. Furthermore, default urban worker trip lengths vary from 10.8- to 14.7- miles, with an average of 11.17 miles. Thus, while default worker trip lengths vary by location, default urban worker trip lengths tend to be shorter in length. Based on these trends evident in the CalEEMod default worker trip lengths, we can reasonably assume that the efficacy of a local hire requirement is especially dependent upon the urbanization of the project site, as well as the project location. Practical Application of a Local Hire Requirement and Associated Impact To provide an example of the potential impact of a local hire provision on construction -related GHG emissions, we estimated the significance of a local hire provision for the Village South Specific Plan ("Project") located in the City of Claremont ("City"). The Project proposed to construct 1,000 residential units, 100,000-SF of retail space, 45,000-SF of office space, as well as a 50-room hotel, on the 24-acre site. The Project location is classified as Urban and lies within the Los Angeles -South Coast County. As a result, the Project has a default worker trip length of 14.7 miles.14 In an effort to evaluate the potential for a local hire provision to reduce the Project's construction -related GHG emissions, we prepared an updated model, reducing all worker trip lengths to 10 miles (see Attachment B). Our analysis estimates that if a local hire provision with a 10-mile radius were to be implemented, the GHG emissions associated with Project construction would decrease by approximately 17% (see table below and Attachment C). Local Hire Provision Net Change Without Local Hire Provision Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) 3,623 120.77 With Local Hire Provision Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) Amortized Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e/year) % Decrease in Construction -related GHG Emissions 3,024 100.80 17% As demonstrated above, by implementing a local hire provision requiring 10 mile worker trip lengths, the Project could reduce potential GHG emissions associated with construction worker trips. More broadly, any local hire requirement that results in a decreased worker trip length from the default value has the potential to result in a reduction of construction -related GHG emissions, though the significance of the reduction would vary based on the location and urbanization level of the project site. This serves as an example of the potential impacts of local hire requirements on estimated project -level GHG emissions, though it does not indicate that local hire requirements would result in reduced construction -related GHG emission for all projects. As previously described, the significance of a local hire requirement depends on the worker trip length enforced and the default worker trip length for the project's urbanization level and location. 14 "Appendix D Default Data Tables." CAPCOA, October 2017, available at: http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default- source/caleemod/05 appendix-d2016-3-2.pdf?sfvrsn=4, p. D-85. 4 Disclaimer SWAPE has received limited discovery. Additional information may become available in the future; thus, we retain the right to revise or amend this report when additional information becomes available. Our professional services have been performed using that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable environmental consultants practicing in this or similar localities at the time of service. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the scope of work, work methodologies and protocols, site conditions, analytical testing results, and findings presented. This report reflects efforts which were limited to information that was reasonably accessible at the time of the work, and may contain informational gaps, inconsistencies, or otherwise be incomplete due to the unavailability or uncertainty of information obtained or provided by third parties. Sincerely, Matt Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg. f Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. 5 Attachment A Rural H-W Urban H-W Location Type Location Name (miles) (miles) Air Basin Great Basin 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Lake County 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Lake Tahoe 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Mountain 16.8 10.8 Air Basin North Central 17.1 12.3 Air Basin North Coast 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Northeast 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Sacramento 16.8 10.8 Air Basin Salton Sea 14.6 11 Air Basin San Diego 16.8 10.8 Air Basin San Francisco 10.8 10.8 Air Basin San Joaquin 16.8 10.8 Air Basin South Central 16.8 10.8 Air Basin South Coast 19.8 14.7 Air District Amador County 16.8 10.8 Air District Antelope Valley 16.8 10.8 Air District Bay Area AQMD 10.8 10.8 Air District Butte County 12.54 12.54 Air District Calaveras 16.8 10.8 Air District Colusa County 16.8 10.8 Air District El Dorado 16.8 10.8 Air District Feather River 16.8 10.8 Air District Glenn County 16.8 10.8 Air District Great Basin 16.8 10.8 Air District Imperial County 10.2 7.3 Air District Kern County 16.8 10.8 Air District Lake County 16.8 10.8 Air District Lassen County 16.8 10.8 Air District Mariposa 16.8 10.8 Air District Mendocino 16.8 10.8 Air District Modoc County 16.8 10.8 Air District Mojave Desert 16.8 10.8 Air District Monterey Bay 16.8 10.8 Air District North Coast 16.8 10.8 Air District Northern Sierra 16.8 10.8 Air District Northern 16.8 10.8 Air District Placer County 16.8 10.8 Air District Sacramento 15 10 Air District San Diego 16.8 10.8 Air District San Joaquin 16.8 10.8 Air District San Luis Obispo 13 13 Air District Santa Barbara 8.3 8.3 Air District Shasta County 16.8 10.8 Air District Siskiyou County 16.8 10.8 Air District South Coast 19.8 14.7 Air District Tehama County 16.8 10.8 Air District Tuolumne 16.8 10.8 Air District Ventura County 16.8 10.8 Air District Yolo/Solano 15 10 County Alameda 10.8 10.8 County Alpine 16.8 10.8 County Amador 16.8 10.8 County Butte 12.54 12.54 County Calaveras 16.8 10.8 County Colusa 16.8 10.8 County Contra Costa 10.8 10.8 County Del Norte 16.8 10.8 County El Dorado -Lake 16.8 10.8 County El Dorado- 16.8 10.8 County Fresno 16.8 10.8 County Glenn 16.8 10.8 County Humboldt 16.8 10.8 County Imperial 10.2 7.3 County Inyo 16.8 10.8 County Kern -Mojave 16.8 10.8 County Kern -San 16.8 10.8 County Kings 16.8 10.8 County Lake 16.8 10.8 County Lassen 16.8 10.8 County Los Angeles- 16.8 10.8 County Los Angeles- 19.8 14.7 County Madera 16.8 10.8 County Marin 10.8 10.8 County Mariposa 16.8 10.8 County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8 County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8 County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8 County Mendocino- 16.8 10.8 County Merced 16.8 10.8 County Modoc 16.8 10.8 County Mono 16.8 10.8 County Monterey 16.8 10.8 County Napa 10.8 10.8 County Nevada 16.8 10.8 County Orange 19.8 14.7 County Placer -Lake 16.8 10.8 County Placer -Mountain 16.8 10.8 County Placer- 16.8 10.8 County Plumas 16.8 10.8 County Riverside- 16.8 10.8 County Riverside- 19.8 14.7 County Riverside -Salton 14.6 11 County Riverside -South 19.8 14.7 County Sacramento 15 10 County San Benito 16.8 10.8 County San Bernardino- 16.8 10.8 County San Bernardino- 19.8 14.7 County San Diego 16.8 10.8 County San Francisco 10.8 10.8 County San Joaquin 16.8 10.8 County San Luis Obispo 13 13 County San Mateo 10.8 10.8 County Santa Barbara- 8.3 8.3 County Santa Barbara- 8.3 8.3 County Santa Clara 10.8 10.8 County Santa Cruz 16.8 10.8 County Shasta 16.8 10.8 County Sierra 16.8 10.8 County Siskiyou 16.8 10.8 County Solano- 15 10 County Solano-San 16.8 10.8 County Sonoma -North 16.8 10.8 County Sonoma -San 10.8 10.8 County Stanislaus 16.8 10.8 County Sutter 16.8 10.8 County Tehama 16.8 10.8 County Trinity 16.8 10.8 County Tulare 16.8 10.8 County Tuolumne 16.8 10.8 County Ventura 16.8 10.8 County Yolo 15 10 County Yuba 16.8 10.8 Statewide Statewide 16.8 10.8 Worker Air Basin Great Basin Valleys Lake County Lake Tahoe Mojave Desert Mountain Counties North Central Coast North Coast Northeast Plateau Sacramento Valley Salton Sea San Diego San Francisco Bay Area San Joaquin Valley South Central Coast South Coast Average Mininum Maximum Range igth by Air Basin Rural (miles) 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 16.8 17.1 16.8 16.8 16.8 14.6 16.8 10.8 16.8 16.8 19.8 16.47 10.80 19.80 9.00 Urban (miles) 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 12.3 10.8 10.8 10.8 11 10.8 10.8 10.8 10.8 14.7 11.17 10.80 14.70 3.90 Attachment B CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 44 Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 i 0 ---------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- - h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 + High = — — ;-------------------- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------ _------------------------------ Hotel 50.00 + = — -- —;------------- ------- Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 -----------y----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + = --- ---—;-------------------- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + = --- --------- —;------------- Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 -----------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------=-----------------------i------------------+--------------- Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 i 2789 ------------------------------ _------------------------------ _----------------------------- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass IT 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ r-------------------------------------------------------- FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------ -------------------------- NumberWood r 1.25 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------r----------------------------- ------------------------- NumberWood 48.75 0.00 ---------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------ ------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips -------------------------------------- ST_TR r 158.37 79.82 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips -------------------------------------- ST_TR r 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 94.36 63.99 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 49.97 10.74 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 6.07 6.16 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- SU_TR 5.86 4.18 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 1.05 0.69 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- SU_TR 131.84 78.27 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- SU_TR �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 •i 0.1713 i 1.8242 � 1.1662 i 2.4000e- 0.4169 0.0817 i 0.4986 0.1795 i 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 i 213.1969 213.1969 i 0.0601 0.0000 214.6993 003 ------------- 2022 •i 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 i 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 i � i � � i � i � � i � '� i i i i i i i i • 1 6 i 6 i i i 7 2023 •i 0.6148 i 3.3649 � 5.6747 i 0.0178 � 1.1963 � 0.0996 i 1.2959 � 0.3203 i 0.0935 0.4138 � 0.0000 i 1,627.529 1,627.529 i 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492 '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i 5 2024 •1 4.1619 i 0.1335 0.2810 i 5.9000e- 0.0325 6.4700e- i 0.0390 8.6300e- i 6.0400e- 0.0147 0.0000 i 52.9078 52.9078 i 8.0200e- 0.0000 1 53.1082 004 003 003 003 : 003 i Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 6 6 7 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 •i 0.1713 i 1.8242 � 1.1662 i 2.4000e- 0.4169 0.0817 i 0.4986 0.1795 i 0.0754 0.2549 0.0000 i 213.1967 � 213.1967 i 0.0601 0.0000 214.6991 003 2022 •i 0.6904 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 i 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 i � i � � i � i � � i 3 i 3 i i i 3 2023 •i 0.6148 i 3.3648 5.6747 i 0.0178 1.1963 0.0996 i 1.2959 0.3203 i 0.0935 0.4138 0.0000 i 1,627.529 1,627.529 i 0.1185 0.0000 1,630.492 2024 •1 4.1619 i 0.1335 0.2810 i 5.9000e- 0.0325 6.4700e- i 0.0390 8.6300e- i 6.0400e- 0.0147 0.0000 i 52.9077 52.9077 i 8.0200e- 0.0000 53.1082 004 003 003 003 : 003 i Maximum 4.1619 4.1142 6.1625 0.0189 1.3058 0.1201 1.4259 0.3460 0.1128 0.4588 0.0000 1,721.682 1,721.682 0.1294 0.0000 1,724.918 3 3 3 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2021 11-30-2021 1.4103 1.4103 2 12-1-2021 2-28-2022 1.3613 1.3613 3 3-1-2022 5-31-2022 1.1985 1.1985 4 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 1.1921 1.1921 5 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1918 1.1918 6 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.0774 1.0774 7 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 1.0320 1.0320 8 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 1.0260 1.0260 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 9 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 1.0265 1.0265 10 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 2.8857 2.8857 11 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.6207 1.6207 Highest 2.8857 2.8857 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 i 10.3804 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 i i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 i 220.9670 i 0.0201 i 3.7400e- 222.5835 Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 i 0.7770 7.6200e- i i 0.0966 i 0.0966 i i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1 3,896.073 i 3,896.073 i 0.1303 i 0.0468 3,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i 3 ;� i i i i Mobile •1 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 i 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 1 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 0.0000 1 7,629.016 '1 i i i i i i i i 1 6 i 6 i i 1 2 Waste •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 0.0000 1 514.8354 ------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- ----------------------*------r------ ---------------j-------*------- Water •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 � 29.1632 i 556.6420 � 585.8052 i 3.0183 � 0.0755 � 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 12,531.15 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47 j j j j 07 19 j 51 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 10.3804 i 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 � i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 i Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 0.7770 i 7.6200e- 0.0966 i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 i 3,896.073 3,896.073 i 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i i 3 Mobile •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 i 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016 6 i 6 i i i 2 Waste •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 • 29.1632 i 556.6420 585.8052 i 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 12,531.15 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47 07 19 51 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition +Demolition 19/1/2021 110/12/2021 5: 30: + i 2 :Site Preparation +Site Preparation 110/13/2021 :11/9/2021 5: 20: + i 3 •Grading +Grading 111/10/2021 :1/11/2022 5: 45: + i 4 -Building Construction +Building Construction 11/12/2022 :12/12/2023 5: 500: + i 5 -Paving +Paving 112/13/2023 :1/30/2024 5: 35: + i 6 -Architectural Coating -Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5. 35, Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators ; 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators ; 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders ; 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders ; 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers ; 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment ; 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers ; 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00" 0.001 458.00; 14.70: 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix (HHDT ------------- Site Preparation 7; -----_--, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.00: --------- 14.70: ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix ----------r--------_ ;HDT_Mix ;HHDT �- --------------- ° Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 14.70: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction v -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 14.70: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- ;HHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 14.70: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f ; Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i , , , , 0.0496 , 0.0000 , 0.0496 , 7.5100e- , 0.0000 ; 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0475 , 0.4716 , 0.3235 , 5.8000e- , , 0.0233 , 0.0233 , , 0.0216 ; 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0012 , 51.0012 , 0.0144 , 0.0000 i 51.3601 004 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 1.9300e- i 0.0634 i 0.0148 1.8000e- i 3.9400e- 1.9000e- 4.1300e- i 1.0800e- 1.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 i 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e- i 0.0000 i 17.4869 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 9.7000e- 7.5000e- 8.5100e- 2.000Oe- 2.4700e- 2.000Oe- 2.4900e- 6.5000e- 2.000Oe- 6.7000e- 0.0000 i 2.2251 2.2251 7.000Oe- 0.0000 i 2.2267 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 2.9000e- 0.0641 0.0233 2.000Oe- 6.4100e- 2.1000e- 6.6200e- 1.7300e- 2.000Oe- 1.9300e- 0.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e- 0.0000 19.7136 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 i 7.5100e- 0.0000 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003 Off -Road •i 0.0475 i 0.4716 i 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 i 0.0000 i 51.3600 004 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 004 003 1 j CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Hauling •I 1.9300e- I 0.0634 I 0.0148 11.8000e- 13.9400e- I 1.9000e- 14.1300e- I 1.0800e- 11.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 I 17.4566 I 17.4566 11.2100e- I 0.0000 i 17.4869 �I 003 I I I 004 I 003 I 004 I 003 I 003 I 004 003003 I I- I I I I I I I I I I I Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I- I I I Worker •I 9.7000e- 6.7000e- � 0.0000 I 2.2251 2.2251 0.0000 i 2.2267 17.5000e- 18.5100e- 12.00OOe- 12.4700e- 12.00OOe- 12.4900e- 16.5000e- 12.00OOe- I 17.00OOe- I 'I 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 005 � Total 2.9000e- 0.0641 0.0233 2.00OOe- 6.4100e- 2.1000e- 6.6200e- 1.7300e- 2.00OOe- 1.9300e- 0.0000 19.6816 19.6816 1.2800e- 0.0000 19.7136 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I •I I I I I I I I I I I I I Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I 33.4357 I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7061 004 I I I I 1 I I I I Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e- 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I Hauling •I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I- I I I I I I I I I I I Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •I 7.7000e- 1.9700e- 5.4000e- 0.0000 I 1.7801 1.7801 0.0000 i 1.7814 16.000Oe- 16.8100e- 12.000Oe- I 12.000Oe- 11.9900e- 15.2000e- 11.000Oe- I 15.000Oe- I 'I 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 005 � Total 7.7000e- 6.000Oe- 6.8100e- 2.000Oe- 1.9700e- 2.000Oe- 1.9900e- 5.2000e- 1.000Oe- 5.4000e- 0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.000Oe- 0.0000 1.7814 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I •I I I I I I I I I I I I I Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I 33.4357 I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7060 004 I I I I 1 I I I I Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e- 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 - ------------------------------------------'------------------ - - -- -- - -+-------------'--------------- ------- Worker •i 7.7000e- 6.00OOe- 6.8100e- 2.00OOe- 1.9700e- 2.00OOe- 1.9900e- 5.2000e- 1.00OOe- 5.4000e- 0.0000 i 1.7801 1.7801 5.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.7814 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 7.7000e- 6.00OOe- 6.8100e- 2.00OOe- 1.9700e- 2.00OOe- 1.9900e- 5.2000e- 1.00OOe- 5.4000e- 0.0000 1.7801 1.7801 5.00OOe- 0.0000 1.7814 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3776 003 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 4.1600e- 3.000Oe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.000Oe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 i 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 i 3.7607 i i i i i 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 i Total 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.000Oe- 4.1600e- 3.000Oe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.000Oe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 3.7607 11 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3775 003 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.00OOe- 4.1600e- 3.00OOe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.00OOe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 i 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 i 3.7607 i i i i i 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 i Total 1.6400e- 1.2700e- 0.0144 4.00OOe- 4.1600e- 3.00OOe- 4.2000e- 1.1100e- 3.00OOe- 1.1400e- 0.0000 3.7579 3.7579 1.1000e- 0.0000 3.7607 11 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 0.0807 5.7200e- 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 19.2414 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.000Oe- 7.7000e- 1.000Oe- 7.7000e- 2.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 i 0.6679 0.6679 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.6684 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.0000e- 7.7000e- 1.000Oe- 7.7000e- 2.000Oe- 1.000Oe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6684 11 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 0.0807 5.7200e- 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 19.2414 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 2.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 i 0.6679 0.6679 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.6684 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 2.8000e- 2.1000e- 2.4400e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 1.00OOe- 7.7000e- 2.00OOe- 1.00OOe- 2.1000e- 0.0000 0.6679 0.6679 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.6684 11 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 2.0700 i 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 i i 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1324 i 293.1324 0.0702 i 0.0000 i 294.8881 003 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ---------------- Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 i 442.6435 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.4088 i 0.3066 i 3.5305 0.0107 i 1.1103 8.8700e- 1.1192 i 0.2949 8.1700e- 0.3031 0.0000 i 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 i 0.0000 i 967.4773 003 003 Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 1,408.795 1,408.795 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120 [777000 2 2 8 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 i 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 i 0.0000 i 294.8877 003 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ---------------- Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 i 442.6435 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.4088 i 0.3066 i 3.5305 0.0107 i 1.1103 8.8700e- 1.1192 i 0.2949 8.1700e- 0.3031 0.0000 i 966.8117 966.8117 0.0266 i 0.0000 i 967.4773 003 003 Total 0.4616 2.0027 3.9885 0.0152 1.2243 0.0121 1.2363 0.3278 0.0112 1,408.795 1,408.795 0.0530 0.0000 1,410.120 [777000 2 2 8 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 i 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 i 0.0000 i 287.9814 003j Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 003 j CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 i 418.5624 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.3753 i 0.2708 i 3.1696 0.0101 i 1.0840 8.4100e- 1.0924 i 0.2879 7.7400e- 0.2957 0.0000 i 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 i 0.0000 i 909.9291 003 003 Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e- 1.2051 0.3200 9.1400e- 1,327.336 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491 j 003 j j 003 j [-377000 9 [1,327.336 9 j 6 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 i 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 i 0.0000 i 287.9811 i i i i i • i i i i 003j Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 003 j CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 i 418.5624 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.3753 i 0.2708 i 3.1696 0.0101 i 1.0840 8.4100e- 1.0924 i 0.2879 7.7400e- 0.2957 0.0000 i 909.3439 909.3439 0.0234 i 0.0000 i 909.9291 003 003 Total 0.4135 1.5218 3.5707 0.0144 1.1953 9.8700e- 1.2051 0.3200 9.1400e- 1,327.336 0.0462 0.0000 1,328.491 j 003 j j 003 j [-377000 9 [1,327.336 9 j 6 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 m CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 --------------------------------------------'----------------------- -+ ----�-------------'--------------� Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.000Oe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.000Oe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.8963 0.8963 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.8968 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.0000e- 1.0700e- 1.000Oe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.000Oe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.8968 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 m CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ----------------------- ---------------------'------------------------ --+ ----� -------------'----00- ----00 1 000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.00OOe- 1.0700e- 1.00OOe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.00OOe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 i 0.8963 0.8963 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.8968 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 3.7000e- 2.7000e- 3.1200e- 1.00OOe- 1.0700e- 1.00OOe- 1.0800e- 2.8000e- 1.00OOe- 2.9000e- 0.0000 0.8963 0.8963 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.8968 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0109 i 0.1048 0.1609 i 2.5000e- i i 5.1500e- i 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- i 0.0000 i 22.2073 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 22.2073 11 004 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.000Oe- 1.8100e- 1.000Oe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.000Oe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 i 1.4697 1.4697 4.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.4706 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.000Oe- 1.8100e- 1.000Oe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.000Oe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.000Oe- 0.0000 1.4706 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 i 22.2073 i i i •� 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 11 004 003 003 003 003 003 m CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 - ------------------------------------------'------------------ - - -- -- - -+-------------'--------------- ------- Worker •i 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.00OOe- 1.8100e- 1.00OOe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.00OOe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 i 1.4697 1.4697 4.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.4706 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 5.9000e- 4.1000e- 4.9200e- 2.00OOe- 1.8100e- 1.00OOe- 1.8200e- 4.8000e- 1.00OOe- 4.9000e- 0.0000 1.4697 1.4697 4.00OOe- 0.0000 1.4706 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •1 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.00OOe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 4.4745 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ��--------------------------------------------'----------------------- -+ - -------------'--.--�-------T Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 '� I '� • I • Worker •i 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 i 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 0.0000 i 24.9558 i i i i � i 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i Total 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1007 0.0000 24.9558 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •1 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 4.4745 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I Worker •i 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 i 24.9407 24.9407 6.1000e- 0.0000 i 24.9558 i i i i � i 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i Total 0.0101 6.9900e- 0.0835 2.8000e- 0.0307 2.3000e- 0.0309 8.1500e- 2.2000e- 8.3700e- 0.0000 24.9407 24.9407 6.1007 0.0000 24.9558 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 i 7.7979 i 0.0580 7.8559 i 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 i 7,620.498 � 7,620.498 � 0.3407 i 0.0000 i 7,629.016 6 i 6 i i i 2 Unmitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 • 7,620.498 • 0.3407 - 0.0000 • 7,629.016 6 6 2 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- ......................................----------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total I Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 I CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity •1 I I 1 I 1 I I I 1 I 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 I I 12,512.646 1 2,512.646 I 0.1037 I 1 0.0215 i 2,521.635 Mitigated 5 1 5 1 1 1 6 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 Electricity •1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 0.0000 1 I 1 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 I 12,512.646 1 2,512.646 I 0.1037 I 1 0.0215 2,521.635 Unmitigated 5 1 5 1 I 1 6 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • I 1 1 I 1 NaturalGas 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 Miti 003 7 7 8gated • I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 • 1 1 I 1 NaturalGas 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- - 0.0966 0.0966 - 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 - 1,383.426 - 0.0265 - 0.0254 1,391.647 Unmitigated 003 7 7 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise 1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 ; 1 1 r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T Apartments Mid i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise +007 ; 1 I I 003 _ 1 ; 1 r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T General Office Building i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1 '1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit 8.30736e •1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant) 1 +006 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 ----------- Hotel ------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�-------�-------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_ 1.74095e 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 __ " '-" "I Quality 1 j-------i-------i-------i-------i--------------- i------- i---------------. 1 �-------�-------�-------' r------71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_ 1 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 1 99.0993 Restaurant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1 1 , I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_ Regional Shopping Centers i 91840 .1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 003 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise 1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 004 1 004 1 1 ; 1 r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T Apartments Mid i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise +007 ; 1 I I 003 _ 1 ; 1 r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T General Office Building i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1 '1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit 8.30736e .1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant) 1 +006 i 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 ----------- Hotel ------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�------- -------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , �____--'I-------1 1 1 ------- 1.74095e •1 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -""'-""i Quality '1 j-------i-------i-------i-------i--------------- i------- i---------------��1 �-------�-------�-------1 r-------------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , ____--'I-------1 1 1 T_----- 71 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 99.0993 Restaurant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1 1 , I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_ Regional Shopping Centers i 91840 •1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 ; 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 003 8 8 j j 8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978 Rise 003 004 i --�------it------ Apartments Mid •---------------- *------- 3.94697e •i 1,257.587 i 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086 Rise +006 9 i i i 9 General Office -j--------j------- i 584550 •i 186.2502 i 7.6900e- 1.5900e- 186.9165 Building 003 003 High Turnover (Sit -j- - - - - --- - - - - - - 1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135 Down Restaurant) i +006 003 -- Hotel -----•--------------- -ii------- i 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 175.9672 003 003 - Quality •�- - - - - --- - - - - -- ------ii------- 353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141 Restaurant ;1 i 003 i 004 Regional 756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- T 241.7395 Shopping Center 003 i 003 Total 2,512.646 0.1037 0.0215 2:521.635 5 6 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978 Rise 003 004 i Apartments Mid • ---------------- 3.94697e •i 1,257.587 i 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086 Rise +006 9 i i i 9 General Office -j--------j------- i 584550 •i 186.2502 i 7.6900e- 1.5900e- 186.9165 Building 003 003 High Turnover (Sit -j- - - - - --- - - - - - - 1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135 Down Restaurant) i +006 003 ---r--- Hotel ------- *------- ---ii•--------------- i 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 175.9672 003 003 --- Quality •�- - - - - --- r------ii------- *------- 353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141 Restaurant ;1 003 i 004 Regional -------------- 756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- 241.7395 Shopping Center 003 i 003 Total 2,512.646�71037 0.0215 2,521.635 5 6 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 � 10.3804 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 i i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201 � 3.7400e- 1 222.5835 003 003 Unmitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e- - 0.0714 - 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 - 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.4137 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating % ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------*------- Consumer �� 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- i 0.0143 i 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- i 205.3295 •� 003 003 003 i . Landscaping •i 0.3096 i 0.1187 10.3054 i 5.4000e- i 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 i 17.2540 i 004 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e- 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.4137 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- 205.3295 003 003 003 i Landscaping •i 0.3096 i 0.1187 10.3054 i 5.4000e- i 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 i 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 004 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e- 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 11 003 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •1 585.8052 i 3.0183 i 0.0755 i 683.7567 - - - - - - - - - - - % --------------4------------------------------- - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low 1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471 Rise 1.02688 ;i i 003 '-------- -------- ------- Apartments Mid 1 63.5252 / •1 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363 Rise 40.0485 ; -- - - - --- - - - - - - General Office 1 7.99802 / •i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- i 61.6019 Building 4.90201 ;i i 003 - - - - - - - ------- -j------- --------- - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit 10.9272 / •i 51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e- 62.8482 Down Restaurant) i 0.697482 ;i i 003 ' -------- ------- Hotel i 1.26834 / •1 6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e- i 7.5079 0.140927 'i 003 -- - - - - --- - - - - - - Quality 2.42827 / •i 11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e- 13.9663 Restaurant i 0.154996 ;i i 003 ---------- --------------- Regional 4.14806 / •i 27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e- 31.9490 Shopping Center 2.54236 ;i i 003 Total 585.8052 j 3.0183 j 0.0755 683.7567 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low 1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471 Rise 1.02688 ;i i 003 '-------- -------- ------- Apartments Mid 1 63.5252 / •1 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363 Rise 40.0485 ; -- - - - --- - - - - - - General Office 1 7.99802 / •i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- i 61.6019 Building 4.90201 ;i 003 --r- ----- ------- -j--------------- * - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit 10.9272 / •i 51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e- 62.8482 Down Restaurant) i 0.697482 ;i i 003 ' -------- ------- Hotel i 1.26834 / •1 6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e- i 7.5079 0.140927 'i 003 -- - - - - --- - - - - - - Quality 2.42827 / •i 11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e- 13.9663 Restaurant i 0.154996 ;i i 003 ---------- --------------- Regional 4.14806 / •i 27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e- 31.9490 Shopping Center 2.54236 ;i i 003 Total 585.8052 j 3.0183 j 0.0755 683.7567 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual CategoryNear Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 207.8079 i 12.2811 i 0.0000 1 514.8354 - - - - - - - - - - - % --------------+------------------------------ - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low 11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834 Rise •� i • '-------'------- Apartments Mid i 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513 Rise •� -------- i -------- ------- '------- GeneralOffice i 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 i 21.0464 Building i •� - ------ �i------- '------- '------- *------- High Turnover (Sit 428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430 Down Restaurant)1 •� • '-------'------- Hotel i 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694 __ i i Quality 7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712 Restaurant i •� • -------- ------- 58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706 Shopping Center i •� Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low 11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834 Rise •� i • '-------'------- Apartments Mid i 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513 Rise •� -------- i -------- ------- '------- GeneralOffice i 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 i 21.0464 Building i •� - ------ �i------- '------- '------- *------- High Turnover (Sit 428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430 Down Restaurant)1 •� '-------'------- Hotel i 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694 __ i i Quality 7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712 Restaurant i •� • - ' - - - - - - -'- - - - - - - Regional 58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706 Shopping Center i •� Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 44 Date: 1/6/2021 1:52 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 i 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_ h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 High ----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------- - - - - --- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 + -----------------------------_------------------------------_- Hotel 50.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = - ---;-------------- - - - - - - Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 ------ - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = --- ----;-------------- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 _ --- - - - - -p--------------------_------------------------------ A Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + ----------------------------- = --- ----;------------- - - - - - - Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 ---- - - - - ---------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Apartments artments Mid Rise 975.00 + ----- -------- --------- -i------------------+--------------- Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 i 2789 ------------------------------_------------------------------_ ----------------------- - - - - -- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass IT 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ r-------------------------------------------------------- FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------ -------------------------- NumberWood r 1.25 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------r----------------------------- ------------------------- NumberWood 48.75 0.00 ---------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------ ------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips -------------------------------------- ST_TR r 158.37 79.82 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips -------------------------------------- ST_TR r 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 94.36 63.99 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 49.97 10.74 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 6.07 6.16 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- SU_TR 5.86 4.18 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 1.05 0.69 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- SU_TR 131.84 78.27 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- SU_TR �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2769 i 46.4588 31.6840 i 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 i 20.3135 9.9840 i 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 i 6,234.797 6,234.797 i 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535 4 i 4 i i 2 2022 •i 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 i 15,251.56 15,251.56 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52 i i i i i •� 74 74 i 88 2023 •i 4.8957 i 26.3317 46.7567 i 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 i 10.6482 2.6381 i 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 i 14,807.52 14,807.52 i 1.0250 0.0000 14,833.15 2024 •1 237.1630 i 9.5575 15.1043 i 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 i 1.8628 0.4743 i 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 i 2,361.398 2,361.398 i 0.7177 0.0000 2,379.342 9 i 9 i i i 1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 15,251.56 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52 11 74 74 88 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2769 46.4588 31.6840 0.0643 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 i 6,234.797 6,234.797 1.9495 0.0000 6,283.535 i i i i i 4 i 4 i i 2 2022 •i 5.3304 38.8967 49.5629 0.1517 9.8688 1.6366 10.7727 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 i 15,251.56 15,251.56 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52 i i i i i •� 74 74 i 88 2023 •i 4.8957 i 26.3317 46.7567 i 0.1472 9.8688 0.7794 i 10.6482 2.6381 i 0.7322 3.3702 0.0000 i 14,807.52 14,807.52 i 1.0250 0.0000 14,833.15 2024 •1 237.1630 i 9.5575 15.1043 i 0.0244 1.7884 0.4698 i 1.8628 0.4743 i 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 i 2,361.398 2,361.398 i 0.7177 0.0000 2,379.342 9 i 9 i i i 1 Maximum 237.1630 46.4588 49.5629 0.1517 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 15,251.56 15,251.56 1.9503 0.0000 15,278.52 74 74 88 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 i i � � i � i i 50 50 i 92 --------------- Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 i 2 i i i 7 Mobile •1 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 i 46.2951 12.2950 i 0.3119 12.6070 i 50,306.60 50,306.60 i 2.1807 50,361.12 08 34 i 34 � � i Total 41.1168 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 76,811.18 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87 11 762 16 16 86 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 88.4430 i 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 i 0.4874 0.3300 i 18,259.11 �� ■ 50 50 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 i 8,405.638 '� i i i i i i i i i i i ■ 2 2 i 7 Mobile 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 i 46.2951 12.2950 i 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 50,306.60 i 2.1807 i 50,361.12 i ■ 34 34 i 08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 76,811.18 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87 16 16 86 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition !9/1/2021 110/12/2021 5 30: i i _ 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation !10/13/2021 i11/9/2021 5 20: i i _ 3 •Grading +Grading !11/10/2021 i1/11/2022 5 45: i i _ 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction ! 1/12/2022 :12/12/2023 5: 500: i i _ 5 :Paving +Paving ! 12/13/2023 i 1/30/2024 5: 35: + I 1 1 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating -1/31/2024 -3/19/2024 5, 35- Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators ; 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators ; 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders ; 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders ; 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers ; 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment ; 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers ; 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00 0.001 458.00; 14.70: 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix EHHDT ------------- Site Preparation 7; -----_-_, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.00: --------- 14.70: ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix ----------r--------_ ;HDT_Mix ?HHDT �- --------------- ° Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 14.70: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction v -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 14.70: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- ;HHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 14.70: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 3.3074 , 0.0000 , 3.3074 , 0.5008 , 0.0000 ; 0.5008 � i , 0.0000 , , i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 , 31.4407 , 21.5650 , 0.0388 , , 1.5513 , 1.5513 , , 1.4411 ; 1.4411 i 3,747.944 , 3,747.944 , 1.0549 , i 3,774.317 9 i 9 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3:774.317 9 9 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 1,292.241 0.0877 i 1,294.433 i i � i i � � i '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 7 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0643 i 0.0442 i 0.6042 1.7100e- i 0.1677 1.3500e- 0.1690 i 0.0445 1.2500e- 0.0457 i 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e- i 1 170.9413 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.0927 1,465.375 f-77771,463.056 8 17,463.056 8 1 0 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 i 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 i 31.4407 i 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 i 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 i i 3,774.317 '� i i i i i i i i i i i • 9 9 i 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3,774.317 9 9 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 i 1,292.241 1,292.241 0.0877 i 1,294.433 i i � i i • � � i '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 7 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0643 i 0.0442 i 0.6042 1.7100e- i 0.1677 1.3500e- 0.1690 i 0.0445 1.2500e- 0.0457 i 170.8155 170.8155 5.0300e- i 1 170.9413 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.1916 4.1394 1.5644 0.0136 0.4346 0.0139 0.4485 0.1176 0.0133 0.0927 1,465.375 f-77771,463.056 8 17,463.056 8 1 0 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 � 0.0380 i � 2.0445 � 2.0445 i � 1.8809 � 1.8809 � i 3,685.656 � 3,685.656 � 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 '� i i i i i i i i i • g 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0772 i 0.0530 i 0.7250 2.0600e- i 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 i 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- i i 205.1296 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e- 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- 205.1296 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 i 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 i g 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0772 i 0.0530 i 0.7250 2.0600e- i 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 i 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- i i 205.1296 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0772 0.0530 0.7250 2.0600e- 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 204.9786 204.9786 6.0400e- 205.1296 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 � 0.0620 i � 1.9853 � 1.9853 i � 1.8265 � 1.8265 � i 6,007.043 � 6,007.043 � 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 777 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0857 i 0.0589 i 0.8056 2.2900e- i 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 i 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- i i 227.9217 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e- 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- 227.9217 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 i 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0857 i 0.0589 i 0.8056 2.2900e- i 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 i 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- i i 227.9217 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0857 0.0589 0.8056 2.2900e- 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 227.7540 227.7540 6.7100e- 227.9217 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 � 0.0621 i � 1.6349 � 1.6349 i � 1.5041 1.5041 � i 6,011.410 � 6,011.410 � 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i 5 5 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0803 i 0.0532 i 0.7432 2.2100e- i 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 i 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- i i 219.8941 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e- 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- 219.8941 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 i 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0803 i 0.0532 i 0.7432 2.2100e- i 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 i 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- i i 219.8941 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0803 0.0532 0.7432 2.2100e- 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 219.7425 219.7425 6.0600e- 219.8941 003 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 i 0.0269 0.8090 i 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.4079 i 13.2032 i 3.4341 � 0.0364 i 0.9155 � 0.0248 0.9404 i 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 3,896.548 0.2236 i i 3,902.138 2 i 2 i i i 4 Worker •i 3.2162 i 2.1318 i 29.7654 0.0883 i 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 i 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 i 8,800.685 8,800.685 0.2429 i i 8,806.758 7 i 7 i i i 2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 12,697.23 0.4665 12,708.89 j j j j [77712,697.23 39 39 j 66 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 i 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.4079 i 13.2032 i 3.4341 � 0.0364 i 0.9155 � 0.0248 0.9404 i 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 3,896.548 3,896.548 0.2236 i i 3,902.138 2 i 2 i i i 4 Worker •i 3.2162 i 2.1318 i 29.7654 0.0883 i 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 i 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 i 8,800.685 8,800.685 0.2429 i i 8,806.758 7 i 7 i i i 2 Total 3.6242 15.3350 33.1995 0.1247 9.8688 0.0949 9.9637 2.6381 0.0883 12,697.23 0.4665 12,708.89 j j j j [77712,697.23 39 39 j 66 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 � i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 i i i i i i i i 9 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.658T 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 j j j j j j 9 9 1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3027 i 10.0181 i 3.1014 0.0352 i 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 i 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 i 3,773.876 3,773.876 0.1982 i i 3,778.830 2 i 2 i i i 0 Worker •i 3.0203 i 1.9287 i 27.4113 0.0851 i 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 i 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8,478.440 0.2190 i i 8,483.916 8 i 8 i i i 0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 12,252.31 0.4172 12,262.74 70 70 60 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 9 i 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 11 9 9 1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3027 i 10.0181 i 3.1014 0.0352 i 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 i 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 i 3,773.876 3,773.876 0.1982 i i 3,778.830 2 i 2 i i 1 0 Worker •i 3.0203 i 1.9287 i 27.4113 0.0851 i 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 i 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 8,478.440 8,478.440 0.2190 i i 8,483.916 8 i 8 i i i 0 Total 3.3229 11.9468 30.5127 0.1203 9.8688 0.0797 9.9485 2.6381 0.0738 2.7118 12,252.31 12,252.31 0.4172 12,262.74 70 70 60 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 '� i i i i i i i i 1 i 1 i i i 6 • Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0566 i 0.0361 i 0.5133 1.5900e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- i i 158.8748 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- 158.8748 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 i 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 1 i 1 i i i 6 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 11 1 1 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0566 i 0.0361 i 0.5133 1.5900e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- i i 158.8748 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0566 0.0361 0.5133 1.5900e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 158.7723 158.7723 4.1000e- 158.8748 003 003 003 003 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0535 i 0.0329 i 0.4785 1.5400e- i 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 i 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- i i 153.9458 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e- 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- 153.9458 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 i 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0535 i 0.0329 i 0.4785 1.5400e- i 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 i 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- i i 153.9458 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0535 0.0329 0.4785 1.5400e- 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 153.8517 153.8517 3.7600e- 153.9458 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •i 236.4115 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 i 2.9700e- i i 0.0609 i 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 i 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 ��--------------------------------------------'----------------------- -+ ------� -------------'--------------- Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.5707 i 0.3513 i 5.1044 0.0165 i 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 i 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 i 1,641.085 1,641.085 0.0401 i i 1,642.088 2 i 2 i i i 6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 777 1,641.085 1,641.085 0.0401 1,642.088 2 2 6 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •1 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � ---------------------------------------------'------------------------ --+ ------� -------------'--------------- Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.5707 i 0.3513 i 5.1044 0.0165 i 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 i 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 i 1,641.085 1,641.085 0.0401 i i 1,642.088 2 i 2 i i i 6 Total 0.5707 0.3513 5.1044 0.0165 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 777 1,641.085 1,641.085 0.0401 1,642.088 2 2 6 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 i 45.9592 i 0.3360 46.2951 i 12.2950 � 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 50,306.60 2.1807 i i 50,361.12 •� . 34 34 i 08 Unmitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 • 50,306.60 • 2.1807 - 50,361.12 34 34 08 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- ......................................----------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 i 4.2573 0.0418 i i 0.5292 0.5292 i i 0.5292 0.5292 + i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 i 0.1532 1 8,405.638 Mitigated ;i . i 2 2 i 7 NaturalGas 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 • 8,355.983 • 0.1602 0.1532 • 8,405.638 Unmitigated 2 2 7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low i 1119.16 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- i 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid 35784.3 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 i 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1------------------------------------------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------ � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1283.42 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- i 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22759.9 •1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 i 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r-------1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel i 4769.72 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 i 564.4782 1 1 1 1 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 j i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 Quality 1 5057.75 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � v 1 1 1 1 T""--- 251.616 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low i 1.11916 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- i 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid i 35.7843 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 i 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1 1------- ----------------------------- -------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------71_----__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1.28342 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- i 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22.7599 .1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 i 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r------�1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel i 4.76972 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 i 564.4782 1 1 I I 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 -r------71 j i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 ------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �-------I-------1 1 1 T'------ Quality 5.05775 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T""--- 0.251616 •1 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 077 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 � 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 i i 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 i 18,259.11 50 50 92 -------------i i Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 • 18,148.59 - 0.4874 • 0.3300 • 18,259.11 50 50 92 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating•' ' i %i- ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------------------------*------- Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products •' . ' i Hearth •i 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96 i i i i i i i Landscaping •i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 i 152.1542 003 i i i i i i i i i • Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 50 50 92 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 1.6500 i 14.1000 6.0000 i 0.0900 1.1400 i 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 i 18,000.00 18,000.00 i 0.3450 1 0.3300 1 18,106.96 ---- -- - - - ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - --- - -- ------------------------------ Landscaping i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 152.1542 003 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 j j F-777000 50 50 j 92 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:54 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Fire Pumos and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 i 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_ h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 High ----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------- - - - - --- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 + -----------------------------_------------------------------_- Hotel 50.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = - ---;-------------- - - - - - - Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 ------ - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = --- ----;-------------- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 _ --- - - - - -p--------------------_------------------------------ A Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + ----------------------------- = --- ----;------------- - - - - - - Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 ---- - - - - ---------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Apartments artments Mid Rise 975.00 + ----- -------- --------- -i------------------+--------------- Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 i 2789 ------------------------------_------------------------------_ ----------------------- - - - - -- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass IT 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ r-------------------------------------------------------- FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------ -------------------------- NumberWood r 1.25 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------r----------------------------- ------------------------- NumberWood 48.75 0.00 ---------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------ ------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips -------------------------------------- ST_TR r 158.37 79.82 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips -------------------------------------- ST_TR r 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 94.36 63.99 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 49.97 10.74 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 6.07 6.16 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- SU_TR 5.86 4.18 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- SU_TR r 1.05 0.69 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- SU_TR 131.84 78.27 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 5.95 3.20 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- SU_TR �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2865 i 46.4651 31.6150 i 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 i 20.3135 9.9840 i 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 i 6,221.493 6,221.493 i 1.9491 � 0.0000 6,270.221 7 i 7 i i 4 2022 •i 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 i 14,630.30 14,630.30 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26 i i i i i 99 99 63 2023 •i 5.2705 i 26.4914 � 44.5936 i 0.1413 � 9.8688 � 0.7800 i 10.6488 � 2.6381 i 0.7328 3.3708 � 0.0000 i 14,210.34 � 14,210.34 i 1.0230 � 0.0000 � 14,235.91 •� i i � � i � i � � i 24 i 24 i 60 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------*-------� -------------------------------*------- 2024 •1 237.2328 i 9.5610 15.0611 i 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 i 1.8628 0.4743 i 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 i 2,352.417 2,352.417 i 0.7175 0.0000 2,370.355 8 i 8 i i i 0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 14,630.30 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26 11 99 99 63 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2865 i 46.4651 31.6150 i 0.0642 18.2675 2.0461 i 20.3135 9.9840 i 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 i 6,221.493 6,221.493 i 1.9491 � 0.0000 6,270.221 7 i 7 i i 4 2022 •i 5.7218 38.9024 47.3319 0.1455 9.8688 1.6366 10.7736 3.6558 1.5057 5.1615 0.0000 i 14,630.30 14,630.30 1.9499 0.0000 14,657.26 i i i i i 99 99 63 2023 •i 5.2705 i 26.4914 � 44.5936 i 0.1413 � 9.8688 � 0.7800 i 10.6488 � 2.6381 i 0.7328 3.3708 � 0.0000 i 14,210.34 � 14,210.34 i 1.0230 � 0.0000 � 14,235.91 •� i i � � i � i � � i 24 i 24 i 60 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------*-------� -------------------------------*------- 2024 •1 237.2328 i 9.5610 15.0611 i 0.0243 1.7884 0.4698 i 1.8628 0.4743 i 0.4322 0.5476 0.0000 i 2,352.417 2,352.417 i 0.7175 0.0000 2,370.355 8 i 8 i i i 0 Maximum 237.2328 46.4651 47.3319 0.1455 18.2675 2.0461 20.3135 9.9840 1.8824 11.8664 0.0000 14,630.30 14,630.30 1.94 99 0.0000 14,657.26 99 99 63 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 i i � � i � i i 50 50 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 i 2 i i i 7 Mobile •i 9.5233 i 45.9914 � 110.0422 i 0.4681 � 45.9592 � 0.3373 i 46.2965 � 12.2950 i 0.3132 12.6083 i 47,917.80 � 47,917.80 i 2.1953 � � 47,972.68 '� 05 05 i 39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 74,422.37 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44 87 87 17 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 88.4430 i 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 i 0.4874 0.3300 i 18,259.11 �� ■ 50 50 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 i 8,405.638 '� i i i i i i i i i i i ■ 2 2 i 7 Mobile 9.5233 i 45.9914 110.0422 i 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 i 46.2965 12.2950 i 0.3132 12.6083 � 47,917.80 47,917.80 i 2.1953 47,972.68 i ■ 05 05 i 39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 74,422.37 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44 87 87 17 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition !9/1/2021 110/12/2021 5 30: i i _ 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation !10/13/2021 i11/9/2021 5 20: i i _ 3 •Grading +Grading !11/10/2021 i1/11/2022 5 45: i i _ 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction ! 1/12/2022 :12/12/2023 5: 500: i i _ 5 :Paving +Paving ! 12/13/2023 i 1/30/2024 5: 35: + I 1 1 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating -1/31/2024 -3/19/2024 5, 35- Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators ; 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators ; 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders ; 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders ; 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers ; 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment ; 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers ; 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00" 0.001 458.00; 14.70: 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix (HHDT ------------- Site Preparation 7; -----_--, 18.00: --------i 0.001 0.00: --------- 14.70: ------------------------ 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix ----------r--------_ ;HDT_Mix ;HHDT �- --------------- ° Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 14.70: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction v -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 14.70: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- ;HHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 14.70: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 14.70, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 3.3074 , 0.0000 , 3.3074 , 0.5008 , 0.0000 ; 0.5008 � i , 0.0000 , , i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 , 31.4407 , 21.5650 , 0.0388 , , 1.5513 , 1.5513 , , 1.4411 ; 1.4411 i 3,747.944 , 3,747.944 , 1.0549 , i 3,774.317 9 i 9 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3:774.317 9 9 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 1,269.855 0.0908 i 1,272.125 i i � i � i i '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i i 2 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0715 i 0.0489 i 0.5524 1.6100e- i 0.1677 1.3500e- 0.1690 i 0.0445 1.2500e- 0.0457 i 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e- i 1 160.9560 003 003 003 003 1 Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 1,430.693 0.0955 1,433.081 2 2 2 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 i 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 i 31.4407 i 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 i 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 i i 3,774.317 '� i i i i i i i i i i i • 9 9 i 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3,774.317 9 9 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 i 1,269.855 1,269.855 0.0908 i 1,272.125 i i � i � i • i '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i i 2 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0715 i 0.0489 i 0.5524 1.6100e- i 0.1677 1.3500e- 0.1690 i 0.0445 1.2500e- 0.0457 i 160.8377 160.8377 4.7300e- i 1 160.9560 003 003 003 003 1 Total 0.2019 4.1943 1.5706 0.0133 0.4346 0.0141 0.4487 0.1176 0.0135 0.1311 1,430.693 1,430.693 0.0955 1,433.081 2 2 2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 � 0.0380 i � 2.0445 � 2.0445 i � 1.8809 � 1.8809 � i 3,685.656 � 3,685.656 � 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 '� i i i i i i i i • g i 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0858 i 0.0587 i 0.6629 1.9400e- i 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 i 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- i i 193.1472 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e- 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- 193.1472 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 i 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 i g g 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0858 i 0.0587 i 0.6629 1.9400e- i 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 i 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- i i 193.1472 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0858 0.0587 0.6629 1.9400e- 0.2012 1.6300e- 0.2028 0.0534 1.5000e- 0.0549 193.0052 193.0052 5.6800e- 193.1472 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 � 0.0620 i � 1.9853 � 1.9853 i � 1.8265 � 1.8265 � i 6,007.043 � 6,007.043 � 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 777 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0954 i 0.0652 i 0.7365 2.1500e- i 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 i 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- i i 214.6080 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e- 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- 214.6080 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 i 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0954 i 0.0652 i 0.7365 2.1500e- i 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 i 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- i i 214.6080 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0954 0.0652 0.7365 2.1500e- 0.2236 1.8100e- 0.2254 0.0593 1.6600e- 0.0610 214.4502 214.4502 6.3100e- 214.6080 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 � 0.0621 i � 1.6349 � 1.6349 i � 1.5041 1.5041 � i 6,011.410 � 6,011.410 � 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i 5 5 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0896 i 0.0589 i 0.6784 2.0800e- i 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 i 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- i i 207.0563 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e- 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- 207.0563 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 i 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0896 i 0.0589 i 0.6784 2.0800e- i 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 i 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- i i 207.0563 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0896 0.0589 0.6784 2.0800e- 0.2236 1.7500e- 0.2253 0.0593 1.6100e- 0.0609 206.9139 206.9139 5.7000e- 207.0563 003 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 i 0.0269 0.8090 i 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.4284 i 13.1673 i 3.8005 � 0.0354 i 0.9155 � 0.0256 0.9412 i 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 3,789.075 0.2381 i i 3,795.028 0 i 0 i i i 3 Worker •i 3.5872 i 2.3593 i 27.1680 0.0832 i 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 i 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 i 8,286.901 8,286.901 0.2282 i i 8,292.605 3 i 3 i i i 8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 12,075.97 0.4663 12,087.63 [77712,075.97 63 63 41 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 i 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.4284 i 13.1673 i 3.8005 � 0.0354 i 0.9155 � 0.0256 0.9412 i 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 3,789.075 0.2381 i i 3,795.028 0 i 0 i i i 3 Worker •i 3.5872 i 2.3593 i 27.1680 0.0832 i 8.9533 0.0701 9.0234 i 2.3745 0.0646 2.4390 i 8,286.901 8,286.901 0.2282 i i 8,292.605 3 i 3 i i i 8 Total 4.0156 15.5266 30.9685 0.1186 9.8688 0.0957 9.9645 2.6381 0.0891 12,075.97 0.4663 12,087.63 [77712,075.97 63 63 41 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 � i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 i i i i i i i i 9 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.658T 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 j j j j j j 9 9 1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3183 i 9.9726 i 3.3771 0.0343 i 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 i 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 i 3,671.400 3,671.400 0.2096 i i 3,676.641 7 i 7 i i i 7 Worker •i 3.3795 i 2.1338 i 24.9725 0.0801 i 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 i 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 � 7,983.731 0.2055 i i 7,988.868 8 i 8 i i i 3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 11,655.13 0.4151 11,665.50 j j j j 25 25 j 99 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 9 i 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 11 9 9 1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3183 i 9.9726 i 3.3771 0.0343 i 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 i 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 i 3,671.400 3,671.400 0.2096 i i 3,676.641 '� i i i i i i i i • 7 i 7 i i i 7 Worker •i 3.3795 i 2.1338 i 24.9725 0.0801 i 8.9533 0.0681 9.0214 i 2.3745 0.0627 2.4372 7,983.731 � 7,983.731 0.2055 i i 7,988.868 8 i 8 i i i 3 Total 3.6978 12.1065 28.3496 0.1144 9.8688 0.0803 9.9491 2.6381 0.0743 2.7124 11,655.13 11,655.13 0.4151 11,665.50 j j j j 25 25 j 99 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 '� i i i i i i i i • 1 i 1 i i i 6 Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0633 i 0.0400 i 0.4677 � 1.5000e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- i i 149.6043 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- 149.6043 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 i 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 1 i 1 i i i 6 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 11 1 1 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0633 i 0.0400 i 0.4677 � 1.5000e- i 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- i i 149.6043 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0633 0.0400 0.4677 1.5000e- 0.1677 1.2800e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1700e- 0.0456 149.5081 149.5081 3.8500e- 149.6043 003 003 003 003 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 i 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0601 i 0.0364 i 0.4354 1.4500e- i 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- i i 144.9587 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e- 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- 144.9587 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 i 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0601 i 0.0364 i 0.4354 1.4500e- i 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 i 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- i i 144.9587 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0601 0.0364 0.4354 1.4500e- 0.1677 1.2600e- 0.1689 0.0445 1.1600e- 0.0456 144.8706 144.8706 3.5300e- 144.9587 003 003 003 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •i 236.4115 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 i 2.9700e- i i 0.0609 i 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 i 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.6406 i 0.3886 i 4.6439 0.0155 i 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 i 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 i 1,545.286 1,545.286 0.0376 1,546.226 0 i 0 i i i 2 Total 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 1,545.286 0.0376 7546.226 0 0 2 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •1 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I Off -Road •1 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.6406 i 0.3886 i 4.6439 0.0155 i 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 i 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 i 1,545.286 1,545.286 0.0376 1,546.226 0 i 0 i i i 2 Total 0.6406 0.3886 4.6439 0.0155 1.7884 0.0134 1.8018 0.4743 0.0123 0.4866 1,545.286 1,545.286 0.0376 7546.226 0 0 2 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 9.5233 i 45.9914 i 110.0422 i 0.4681 45.9592 i 0.3373 , 46.2965 i 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 i 47,917.80 47,917.80 2.1953 i : 47,972.68 •� . 05 05 i 39 Unmitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 - 47,917.80 47,917.80 • 2.1953 - 47,972.68 05 05 39 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- ......................................----------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 i 4.2573 0.0418 i i 0.5292 0.5292 i i 0.5292 0.5292 + i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 i 0.1532 1 8,405.638 Mitigated ;i . i 2 2 i 7 NaturalGas 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 • 8,355.983 • 0.1602 0.1532 • 8,405.638 Unmitigated 2 2 7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low i 1119.16 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- i 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid 35784.3 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 i 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1------------------------------------------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------ � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1283.42 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- i 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22759.9 •1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 i 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r-------1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel i 4769.72 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 i 564.4782 1 1 1 1 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 j i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 Quality 1 5057.75 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � v 1 1 1 1 T""--- 251.616 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low i 1.11916 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- i 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid i 35.7843 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 i 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1 1------- ----------------------------- -------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------71_----__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1.28342 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- i 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22.7599 .1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 i 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r------�1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel i 4.76972 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 i 564.4782 1 1 I I 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 -r------71 j i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 ------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �-------I-------1 1 1 T'------ Quality 5.05775 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T""--- 0.251616 •1 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 077 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 � 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 i i 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 i 18,259.11 50 50 92 -------------i i Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 • 18,148.59 - 0.4874 • 0.3300 • 18,259.11 50 50 92 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating•' ' i %i- ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------------------------*------- Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products •' . ' i Hearth •i 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96 i i i i i i i Landscaping •i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 i 152.1542 003 i i i i i i i i i • Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 50 50 92 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 1.6500 i 14.1000 6.0000 i 0.0900 1.1400 i 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 i 18,000.00 18,000.00 i 0.3450 1 0.3300 1 18,106.96 ---- -- - - - ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - --- - -- ------------------------------ Landscaping i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 152.1542 003 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 j j F-777000 50 50 j 92 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/6/2021 1:49 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Fire Pumos and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 i 0 ---------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- - h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 + High = — — ;-------------------- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 -----------------------------_------------------------------ _------------------------------ Hotel 50.00 + = — -- —;------------- ------- Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 -----------y----------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + = --- ---—;-------------------- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_----------------------------- Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + = --- --------- —;------------- Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 -----------------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------=-----------------------i------------------+--------------- Apartments Mid Rise 975.00 + Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 i 2789 ------------------------------ _------------------------------ _----------------------------- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Trips and VMT - Local hire provision Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces -----r------------------------------ FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ r-------------------------------------------------------- NumberWood 1.25 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------ ------------------------- NumberWood r 48.75 0.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------r----------------------------- -------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- ST_TR 158.37 79.82 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- ST_TR �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 94.36 63.99 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 49.97 10.74 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 6.07 6.16 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.86 4.18 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 1.05 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 131.84 78.27 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.95 3.20 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 •i 0.1704 i 1.8234 � 1.1577 i 2.3800e- 0.4141 � 0.0817 i 0.4958 0.1788 i 0.0754 0.2542 0.0000 i 210.7654 210.7654 i 0.0600 0.0000 212.2661 003 2022 •i 0.5865 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 i 1,418.655 1,418.655 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692 i i i i i 2023 •i 0.5190 i 3.2850 � 4.7678 i 0.0147 � 0.8497 � 0.0971 i 0.9468 � 0.2283 i 0.0912 0.3195 � 0.0000 i 1,342.441 1,342.441 i 0.1115 0.0000 1,345.229 '� i i i i i i i i • 2 i 2 i i 1 2024 •i 4.1592 0.1313 0.2557 5.000Oe- 0.0221 6.3900e- 0.0285 5.8700e- 5.9700e- 0.0118 0.0000 i 44.6355 44.6355 7.8300e- 0.0000 44.8311 i i i i i 004 003 003 003 003 i Maximum 4.1592 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 1,418.655 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692 11 4 4 5 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.1 Overall Construction Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Year tons/yr MT/yr 2021 •i 0.1704 i 1.8234 � 1.1577 i 2.3800e- 0.4141 � 0.0817 i 0.4958 0.1788 i 0.0754 0.2542 0.0000 i 210.7651 210.7651 i 0.0600 0.0000 212.2658 003 2022 •i 0.5865 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 i 1,418.655 1,418.655 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692 i i i i i 0 2023 •i 0.5190 i 3.2850 4.7678 i 0.0147 0.8497 0.0971 i 0.9468 0.2283 i 0.0912 0.3195 0.0000 i 1,342.440 1,342.440 i 0.1115 0.0000 1,345.228 9 i 9 i i 7 2024 •i 4.1592 0.1313 0.2557 5.000Oe- 0.0221 6.3900e- 0.0285 5.8700e- 5.9700e- 0.0118 0.0000 i 44.6354 44.6354 7.8300e- 0.0000 44.8311 i i i i i 004 003 003 003 003 Maximum 4.1592 4.0240 5.1546 0.0155 0.9509 0.1175 1.0683 0.2518 0.1103 0.3621 0.0000 1,418.655 1,418.655 0.1215 0.0000 1,421.692 11 0 0 1 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction Quarter Start Date End Date Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter) 1 9-1-2021 11-30-2021 1.4091 1.4091 2 12-1-2021 2-28-2022 1.3329 1.3329 3 3-1-2022 5-31-2022 1.1499 1.1499 4 6-1-2022 8-31-2022 1.1457 1.1457 5 9-1-2022 11-30-2022 1.1415 1.1415 6 12-1-2022 2-28-2023 1.0278 1.0278 7 3-1-2023 5-31-2023 0.9868 0.9868 8 6-1-2023 8-31-2023 0.9831 0.9831 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 9 9-1-2023 11-30-2023 0.9798 0.9798 10 12-1-2023 2-29-2024 2.8757 2.8757 11 3-1-2024 5-31-2024 1.6188 1.6188 Highest 2.8757 2.8757 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 i 10.3804 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 i i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 i 220.9670 i 0.0201 i 3.7400e- 222.5835 Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 i 0.7770 7.6200e- i i 0.0966 i 0.0966 i i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1 3,896.073 i 3,896.073 i 0.1303 i 0.0468 3,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i 3 ;� i i i i Mobile •1 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 i 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 1 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 0.0000 1 7,629.016 '1 i i i i i i i i 1 6 i 6 i i 1 2 Waste •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 0.0000 1 514.8354 ------------------ ------- ------- ------- ------- -------------- ----------------------*------r------ ---------------j-------*------- Water •1 i i i � � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 � 29.1632 i 556.6420 � 585.8052 i 3.0183 � 0.0755 � 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 12,531.15 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47 j j j j 07 19 j 51 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 2.2 Overall Operational Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Area •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 10.3804 i 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 � i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 i Energy •i 0.1398 i 1.2312 0.7770 i 7.6200e- 0.0966 i 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 i 3,896.073 3,896.073 i 0.1303 0.0468 3,913.283 003 i i i i i 2 i 2 i i i 3 Mobile •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 19.1834 i 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 i 7.8559 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 i 7,620.498 7,620.498 i 0.3407 0.0000 7,629.016 6 i 6 i i i 2 Waste •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 207.8079 i 0.0000 207.8079 i 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 Water •1 i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 • 29.1632 i 556.6420 585.8052 i 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 Total 6.8692 9.5223 30.3407 0.0914 7.7979 0.2260 8.0240 2.0895 0.2219 2.3114 236.9712 12,294.18 12,531.15 15.7904 0.1260 12,963.47 07 19 51 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 ;Demolition +Demolition 19/1/2021 110/12/2021 5: 30: + i 2 :Site Preparation +Site Preparation 110/13/2021 :11/9/2021 5: 20: + i 3 •Grading +Grading 111/10/2021 :1/11/2022 5: 45: + i 4 -Building Construction +Building Construction 11/12/2022 :12/12/2023 5: 500: + i 5 -Paving +Paving 112/13/2023 :1/30/2024 5: 35: + i 6 -Architectural Coating -Architectural Coating 1/31/2024 3/19/2024 5. 35, Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators ; 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators ; 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders ; 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders ; 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers ; 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment ; 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers ; 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00" , 0.001 458.00; 10.00: 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix (HHDT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • Site Preparation - - - - - - - - - - - - - �_ 7; ________ __'------ -- 18.00: I - - 0.001 - - - - - - i 0.00: - - - - - - - - - ' - - 10.00: - - - - - - - - - - 6.90; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20.00;LD_Mix - - - - - - - - - ;HDT_Mix - T - - - - - - - - - ;HHDT --------------- ° �- Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 10.00: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction v -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 10.00: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- ;HHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 10.00: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f ; Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 10.00, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i , , , , 0.0496 , 0.0000 , 0.0496 , 7.5100e- , 0.0000 ; 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 , 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0475 , 0.4716 , 0.3235 , 5.8000e- , , 0.0233 , 0.0233 , , 0.0216 ; 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0012 , 51.0012 , 0.0144 , 0.0000 i 51.3601 004 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0012 51.0012 0.0144 0.0000 51.3601 004 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 1.9300e- i 0.0634 i 0.0148 1.8000e- i 3.9400e- 1.9000e- 4.1300e- i 1.0800e- 1.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 i 17.4566 17.4566 1.2100e- i 0.0000 i 17.4869 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 7.2000e- 5.3000e- 6.0900e- 2.000Oe- 1.6800e- 1.000Oe- 1.6900e- 4.5000e- 1.000Oe- 4.6000e- 0.0000 i 1.5281 1.5281 5.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.5293 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 2.6500e- 0.0639 0.0209 2.000Oe- 5.6200e- 2.000Oe- 5.8200e- 1.5300e- 1.9000e- 1.7200e- 0.0000 18.9847 18.9847 1.2600e- 0.0000 19.0161 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.0496 0.0000 0.0496 i 7.5100e- 0.0000 7.5100e- 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 003 003 Off -Road •i 0.0475 i 0.4716 i 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0233 0.0233 0.0216 0.0216 0.0000 i 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 i 0.0000 i 51.3600 004 Total 0.0475 0.4716 0.3235 5.8000e- 0.0496 0.0233 0.0729 7.5100e- 0.0216 0.0291 0.0000 51.0011 51.0011 0.0144 0.0000 51.3600 004 003 1 j CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I PM2.5 I PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Hauling •I 1.9300e- I 0.0634 I 0.0148 11.8000e- 13.9400e- I 1.9000e- 14.1300e- I 1.0800e- 11.8000e- 1.2600e- 0.0000 I 17.4566 I 17.4566 11.2100e- I 0.0000 i 17.4869 �I 003 I I I 004 I 003 I 004 I 003 I 003 I 004 003003 I I- I I I I I I I I I I I Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I I I- I I I Worker •I 7.2000e- 1.6800e- 1.00OOe- 4.6000e- � 0.0000 I 1.5281 1.5281 0.0000 i 1.5293 15.3000e- 16.0900e- 12.00OOe- I I 11.6900e- 14.5000e- 11.00OOe- I 15.00OOe- I 'I 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 005 � Total 2.6500e- 0.0639 0.0209 2.00OOe- 5.6200e- 2.00OOe- 5.8200e- 1.5300e- 1.9000e- 1.7200e- 0.0000 18.9847 18.9847 1.2600e- 0.0000 19.0161 11 003 004 003 004 003 003 004 003 003 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I I I I I I 1 I I I •I I I I I I I I I I I I I Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I 33.4357 I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7061 004 I I I I 1 I I I I Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e- 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7061 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Hauling •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I I I I I • I- I I I I I I I I I I I Vendor •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I • I 'I I I I I I I I I I I I I • Worker •I 5.8000e- 1.3400e- 1.000Oe- 3.7000e- 0.0000 I 1.2225 1.2225 0.0000 i 1.2234 14.3000e- 14.8700e- 11.000Oe- I I 11.3500e- 13.6000e- 11.000Oe- I 14.000Oe- I 'I 'I 004 I 004 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 005 I 003 I 004 I 005 004 I 005 � I I I I I I I 1 • Total 5.8000e- 4.3000e- 4.8700e- 1.000Oe- 1.3400e- 1.000Oe- 1.3500e- 3.6000e- 1.000Oe- 3.7000e- 0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.0007 0.0000 1.2234 11 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr I I I I I I I I I I I Fugitive Dust •I I I I I 0.1807 I 0.0000 I 0.1807 I 0.0993 I 0.0000 0.0993 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000 ;� I I I I I I I 1 • � I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I •I I I I I I I I I I I I I Off -Road •I 0.0389 I 0.4050 I 0.2115 13.8000e- I I 0.0204 I 0.0204 I I 0.0188 � 0.0188 � 0.0000 I 33.4357 I 33.4357 I 0.0108 I 0.0000 i 33.7060 004 I I I I 1 • I I I I Total 0.0389 0.4050 0.2115 3.8000e- 0.1807 0.0204 0.2011 0.0993 0.0188 0.1181 0.0000 33.4357 33.4357 0.0108 0.0000 33.7060 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 - ------------------------------------------'------------------ - - -- -- - -+-------------'--------------- ------- Worker •i 5.8000e- 4.3000e- 4.8700e- 1.00OOe- 1.3400e- 1.00OOe- 1.3500e- 3.6000e- 1.00OOe- 3.7000e- 0.0000 i 1.2225 1.2225 4.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.2234 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 5.8000e- 4.3000e- 4.8700e- 1.00OOe- 1.3400e- 1.00OOe- 1.3500e- 3.6000e- 1.00OOe- 3.7000e- 0.0000 1.2225 1.2225 4.00OOe- 0.0000 1.2234 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 0.1741 0.0000 0.1741 i 0.0693 i 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3776 003 Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5405 103.5405 0.0335 0.0000 104.3776 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ------------------------------------------'------------------------ --+-------------'---------------------- Worker •i 1.2200e- 9.000Oe- 0.0103 3.000Oe- 2.8300e- 2.000Oe- 2.8600e- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- 0.0000 i 2.5808 2.5808 8.000Oe- 0.0000 i 2.5828 i i i i i 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 1.2200e- 9.000Oe- 0.0103 3.000Oe- 2.8300e- 2.000Oe- 2.8600e- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- 0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.0007 0.0000 2.5828 11 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •i i i i i 0.1741 i 0.0000 i 0.1741 i 0.0693 0.0000 0.0693 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0796 i 0.8816 i 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.0377 0.0377 0.0347 0.0347 0.0000 i 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 i 0.0000 i 104.3775 003 i i i i i • i i i i Total 0.0796 0.8816 0.5867 1.1800e- 0.1741 0.0377 0.2118 0.0693 0.0347 0.1040 0.0000 103.5403 103.5403 0.0335 0.0000 104.3775 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 1.2200e- 9.000Oe- 0.0103 3.000Oe- 2.8300e- 2.000Oe- 2.8600e- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- 0.0000 i 2.5808 2.5808 8.000Oe- 0.0000 i 2.5828 i i i i i 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 1.2200e- 9.000Oe- 0.0103 3.000Oe- 2.8300e- 2.000Oe- 2.8600e- 7.5000e- 2.000Oe- 7.8000e- 0.0000 2.5808 2.5808 8.000Oe- 0.0000 2.5828 7-t-I 003 004 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 i 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 0.0807 5.7200e- 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 19.2414 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 2.1000e- i 1.5000e- i 1.7400e- 1.000Oe- i 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.3000e- i 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.4000e- 0.0000 i 0.4587 0.4587 1.000Oe- i 0.0000 i 0.4590 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Total 2.1000e- 1.5000e- 1.7400e- 1.0000e- 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.3000e- 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.4000e- 0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.000Oe- 0.0000 0.4590 11 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 0.0807 i 0.0000 i 0.0807 0.0180 i 0.0000 0.0180 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 5.7200e- 5.7200e- 5.2600e- 5.2600e- 0.0000 i 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 i 19.2414 i i i 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Total 0.0127 0.1360 0.1017 2.2000e- 0.0807 5.7200e- 0.0865 0.0180 5.2600e- 0.0233 0.0000 19.0871 19.0871 6.1700e- 0.0000 19.2414 004 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 2.1000e- i 1.5000e- i 1.7400e- 1.00OOe- i 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.3000e- i 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.4000e- 0.0000 i 0.4587 0.4587 1.00OOe- i 0.0000 i 0.4590 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 Total 2.1000e- 1.5000e- 1.7400e- 1.00OOe- 5.2000e- 0.0000 5.3000e- 1.4000e- 0.0000 1.4000e- 0.0000 0.4587 0.4587 1.00OOe- 0.0000 0.4590 11 004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 2.0700 i 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 i i 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 i 0.0000 i 294.8881 003 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1324 293.1324 0.0702 0.0000 294.8881 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ---------------- Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 i 442.6435 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.3051 i 0.2164 i 2.5233 7.3500e- i 0.7557 6.2300e- 0.7619 i 0.2007 5.7400e- 0.2065 0.0000 i 663.9936 663.9936 0.0187 i 0.0000 i 664.4604 003 003 003 i Total 0.3578 1.9125 2.9812 0.0119 0.8696 9.4100e- 0.8790 0.2336 8.7800e- 0.2424 0.0000 1,105.977 1,105.977 0.0451 0.0000 1,107.103 003 003 1 1 9 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.2158 i 1.9754 i 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 i 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 i 0.0000 i 294.8877 003 Total 0.2158 1.9754 2.0700 3.4100e- 0.1023 0.1023 0.0963 0.0963 0.0000 293.1321 293.1321 0.0702 0.0000 294.8877 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ---------------- Vendor •i 0.0527 i 1.6961 i 0.4580 4.5500e- i 0.1140 3.1800e- 0.1171 i 0.0329 3.0400e- 0.0359 0.0000 i 441.9835 441.9835 0.0264 i 0.0000 i 442.6435 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.3051 i 0.2164 i 2.5233 7.3500e- i 0.7557 6.2300e- 0.7619 i 0.2007 5.7400e- 0.2065 0.0000 i 663.9936 663.9936 0.0187 i 0.0000 i 664.4604 003 003 003 i Total 0.3578 1.9125 2.9812 0.0119 0.8696 9.4100e- 0.8790 0.2336 8.7800e- 0.2424 0.0000 1,105.977 1,105.977 0.0451 0.0000 1,107.103 003 003 1 1 9 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 i 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 i 0.0000 i 287.9814 003j Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2789 286.2789 0.0681 0.0000 287.9814 003 j CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 i 418.5624 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.2795 i 0.1910 i 2.2635 6.9100e- i 0.7377 5.9100e- 0.7436 i 0.1960 5.4500e- 0.2014 0.0000 i 624.5363 624.5363 0.0164 i 0.0000 i 624.9466 003 003 003 i Total 0.3177 1.4420 2.6646 0.0112 0.8490 7.3700e- 0.8564 0.2281 6.8500e- 0.2349 0.0000 1,042.529 1,042.529 0.0392 0.0000 1,043.509 003 003 4 4 0 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road 0.1942 i 1.7765 i 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 i 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 i 0.0000 i 287.9811 i i i i i • i i i i 003j Total 0.1942 1.7765 2.0061 3.3300e- 0.0864 0.0864 0.0813 0.0813 0.0000 286.2785 286.2785 0.0681 0.0000 287.9811 003 j CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0382 i 1.2511 i 0.4011 4.3000e- i 0.1113 1.4600e- 0.1127 i 0.0321 1.4000e- 0.0335 0.0000 i 417.9930 417.9930 0.0228 i 0.0000 i 418.5624 003 003 003 i Worker •i 0.2795 i 0.1910 i 2.2635 6.9100e- i 0.7377 5.9100e- 0.7436 i 0.1960 5.4500e- 0.2014 0.0000 i 624.5363 624.5363 0.0164 i 0.0000 i 624.9466 003 003 003 i Total 0.3177 1.4420 2.6646 0.0112 0.8490 7.3700e- 0.8564 0.2281 6.8500e- 0.2349 0.0000 1,042.529 1,042.529 0.0392 0.0000 1,043.509 003 003 4 4 0 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 m CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 ��----------------------- ---------------------'----------------------- -+ - -------------'--.--�-------T Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 '� I '� • I • Worker •i 2.8000e- 1.9000e- 2.2300e- 1.000Oe- 7.3000e- 1.000Oe- 7.3000e- 1.9000e- 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.6156 0.6156 2.000Oe- 0.0000 i 0.6160 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 2.8000e- 1.9000e- 2.2300e- 1.000Oe- 7.3000e- 1.000Oe- 7.3000e- 1.9000e- 1.000Oe- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.0000e- 0.0000 0.6160 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 i 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 i 13.1227 i i i •� 003 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 6.7100e- 0.0663 0.0948 1.5000e- 3.3200e- 3.3200e- 3.0500e- 3.0500e- 0.0000 13.0175 13.0175 4.2100e- 0.0000 13.1227 003 004 003 003 003 003 003 1 1 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 I I Worker •i 2.8000e- 1.9000e- 2.2300e- 1.00OOe- 7.3000e- 1.00OOe- 7.3000e- 1.9000e- 1.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.6156 0.6156 2.00OOe- 0.0000 i 0.6160 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 Total 2.8000e- 1.9000e- 2.2300e- 1.00OOe- 7.3000e- 1.00OOe- 7.3000e- 1.9000e- 1.00OOe- 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.6156 0.6156 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.6160 004 004 003 005 004 005 004 004 005 004 005 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0109 i 0.1048 0.1609 i 2.5000e- i i 5.1500e- i 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- i 0.0000 i 22.2073 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 22.2073 11 004 003 003 003 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 4.4000e- 2.9000e- 3.5100e- 1.000Oe- 1.2300e- 1.000Oe- 1.2400e- 3.3000e- 1.000Oe- 3.4000e- 0.0000 i 1.0094 1.0094 3.000Oe- 0.0000 i 1.0100 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 4.4000e- 2.9000e- 3.5100e- 1.0000e- 1.2300e- 1.000Oe- 1.2400e- 3.3000e- 1.000Oe- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.000Oe- 0.0000 1.0100 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 I PM10 Total I I PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Category tons/yr MT/yr Off -Road •i 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 i 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 i 22.2073 i i i •� 004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i Paving •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.0109 0.1048 0.1609 2.5000e- 5.1500e- 5.1500e- 4.7400e- 4.7400e- 0.0000 22.0292 22.0292 7.1200e- 0.0000 11 004 003 003 003 003 003 m CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 4.4000e- 2.9000e- 3.5100e- 1.00OOe- 1.2300e- 1.00OOe- 1.2400e- 3.3000e- 1.00OOe- 3.4000e- 0.0000 i 1.0094 1.0094 3.00OOe- 0.0000 i 1.0100 i i i i i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 Total 4.4000e- 2.9000e- 3.5100e- 1.00OOe- 1.2300e- 1.00OOe- 1.2400e- 3.3000e- 1.00OOe-F74000e- 0.0000 1.0094 1.0094 3.00OOe- 0.0000 1.0100 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •1 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.00OOe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 4.4745 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 7.4800e- 4.9300e- 0.0596 1.9000e- 0.0209 1.6000e- 0.0211 5.5500e- 1.5000e- 5.7000e- 0.0000 i 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 0.0000 i 17.1394 i i i i i 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i Total 7.4800e- 4.9300e- 0.0596 1.9000e- 0.0209 1.6000e- 0.0211 5.5500e- 1.5000e- 5.7000e- 0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 0.0000 17.1394 11 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating •1 4.1372 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1600e- 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 i 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 i 4.4745 i i i 003 005 003 003 003 003 . 004 i Total 4.1404 0.0213 0.0317 5.000Oe- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 1.0700e- 0.0000 4.4682 4.4682 2.5000e- 0.0000 4.4745 005 003 003 003 003 004 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 Worker •i 7.4800e- 4.9300e- 0.0596 1.9000e- 0.0209 1.6000e- 0.0211 5.5500e- 1.5000e- 5.7000e- 0.0000 i 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 0.0000 i 17.1394 i i i i i 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 i Total 7.4800e- 4.9300e- 0.0596 1.9000e- 0.0209 1.6000e- 0.0211 5.5500e- 1.5000e- 5.7000e- 0.0000 17.1287 17.1287 4.3000e- 0.0000 17.1394 11 003 003 004 004 003 004 003 004 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 1.5857 i 7.9962 i 19.1834 i 0.0821 i 7.7979 i 0.0580 7.8559 i 2.0895 i 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 i 7,620.498 � 7,620.498 � 0.3407 i 0.0000 i 7,629.016 6 i 6 i i i 2 Unmitigated 1.5857 7.9962 19.1834 0.0821 7.7979 0.0580 7.8559 2.0895 0.0539 2.1434 0.0000 7,620.498 • 7,620.498 • 0.3407 - 0.0000 • 7,629.016 6 6 2 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- ......................................----------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 0.0000 1 I 1 0.0000 1 I I 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 I I 12,512.646 1 2,512.646 I 0.1037 I 1 0.0215 i 2,521.635 Mitigated 5 1 5 1 1 1 6 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 Electricity •1 I I I I 1 I I 1 1 I 0.0000 1 I 1 0.0000 I I I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 I 12,512.646 1 2,512.646 I 0.1037 I 1 0.0215 2,521.635 Unmitigated 5 1 5 1 I 1 6 •1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 NaturalGas 0.1398I 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265 I 0.0254 1 1,391.647 Miti 1 I 003 7 7 8gated I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 NaturalGas 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- - 0.0966 0.0966 - 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 • 1,383.426 • 0.0265 - 0.0254 • 1,391.647 Unmitigated 003 7 7 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low I 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise 1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 004 1 004 1 ; 1 1 r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T Apartments Mid i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise +007 ; 1 I I 003 _ 1 ; 1 r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � - 1 1 1 1 T General Office Building i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1 '1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit 8.30736e •1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant) 1 +006 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 ----------- Hotel ------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�-------�-------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_ 1.74095e 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 __ " '-" "I Quality 1 j-------i-------i-------i-------i--------------- i------- i---------------. 1 �-------�-------�-------' r------71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 �____--'I-------1 1 1 T____'-_ 1 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 1 99.0993 Restaurant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1 1 , I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_ Regional Shopping Centers i 91840 .1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 003 8 8 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use I I PM10 I PM10 Total PM2.5 I PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 i 408494 42.2000e- 1 0.0188 1 8.0100e- 1 1.2000e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1 1.5200e- 1 1 1.5200e- 1.5200e- � 0.0000 1 21.7988 1 21.7988 1 4.2000e- 1 4.000Oe- i 21.9284 Rise 1 '1 003 1 1 003 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 004 1 004 1 1 ; 1 r------�I------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T Apartments Mid i 1.30613e .1 0.0704 1 0.6018 1 0.2561 1 3.8400e- 1 1 0.0487 1 0.0487 1 1 0.0487 0.0487 0.0000 1 696.9989 1 696.9989 1 0.0134 1 0.0128 i 701.1408 Rise +007 ; 1 I I 003 _ 1 ; 1 r------71------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , - 1 1 1 1 T General Office Building i 468450 .1 2.5300e- 1 0.0230 1 0.0193 1 1.4000e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1 1.7500e- 1 1 1.7500e- 1.7500e- 0.0000 1 24.9983 1 24.9983 1 4.8000e- 1 4.6000e- i 25.1468 1 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 -----------1 '1-----------------------------------------------------------------------• 1------------------------1 High Turnover (Sit 8.30736e .1 0.0448 1 0.4072 1 0.3421 1 2.4400e- 1 1 0.0310 1 0.0310 1 1 0.0310 0.0310 0.0000 1 443.3124 1 443.3124 1 8.5000e- 1 8.1300e- i 445.9468 Down Restaurant) 1 +006 i 1 1 1 003 1 1 1 1 1 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 ----------- Hotel ------ �'1------------------------------------------�-------�---------------� 1 �-------�------- -------1 r71-------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , �____--'I-------1 1 1 ------- 1.74095e •1 9.3900e- 0.0853 0.0717 5.1000e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 6.4900e- 0.0000 1 92.9036 92.9036 1.7800e- 1.7000e- 93.4557 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -""'-""i Quality '1 j-------i-------i-------i-------i--------------- i------- i---------------��1 �-------�-------�-------1 r-------------1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 , ____--'I-------1 1 1 T_----- 71 1.84608e •1 9.9500e- 0.0905 0.0760 5.4000e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 6.8800e- 0.0000 98.5139 98.5139 1.8900e- 1.8100e- 99.0993 Restaurant 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 +006 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 __t------71-------1 1 , I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 - 1 I I I T_____-_ Regional Shopping Centers i 91840 •1 5.000Oe- 1 4.5000e- 1 3.7800e- 1 3.000Oe- 1 1 3.4000e- 1 3.4000e- 1 1 3.4000e- 3.4000e- 0.0000 1 4.9009 1 4.9009 1 9.000Oe- 1 9.000Oe- i 4.9301 ; 004 1 003 1 003 1 005 1 1 004 1 004 1 1 004 004 . 1 1 005 1 005 1 Total 0.1398 1.2312 0.7770 7.6200e- 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0966 0.0000 1,383.426 1,383.426 0.0265 0.0254 1,391.647 003 8 8 j j 8 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978 Rise 003 004 i --�------it------ Apartments Mid •---------------- *------- 3.94697e •i 1,257.587 i 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086 Rise +006 9 i i i 9 General Office -j--------j------- i 584550 •i 186.2502 i 7.6900e- 1.5900e- 186.9165 Building 003 003 High Turnover (Sit -j- - - - - --- - - - - - - 1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135 Down Restaurant) i +006 003 -- Hotel -----•--------------- -ii------- i 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 175.9672 003 003 - Quality •�- - - - - --- - - - - -- ------ii------- 353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141 Restaurant ;1 i 003 i 004 Regional 756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- T 241.7395 Shopping Center 003 i 003 Total 2,512.646 0.1037 0.0215 2:521.635 5 6 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Mitigated Electricity Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Use Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Apartments Low 106010 •i 33.7770 i 1.3900e- 2.9000e- 33.8978 Rise 003 004 i Apartments Mid • ---------------- 3.94697e •i 1,257.587 i 0.0519 0.0107 1,262.086 Rise +006 9 i i i 9 General Office -j--------j------- i 584550 •i 186.2502 i 7.6900e- 1.5900e- 186.9165 Building 003 003 High Turnover (Sit -j- - - - - --- - - - - - - 1.58904e •1 506.3022 i 0.0209 4.3200e- 508.1135 Down Restaurant) i +006 003 ---r--- Hotel ------- *------- ---ii•--------------- i 550308 •1 175.3399 i 7.2400e- 1.5000e- 175.9672 003 003 --- Quality •�- - - - - --- r------ii------- *------- 353120 •1 112.5116 i 4.6500e- 9.6000e- 112.9141 Restaurant ;1 003 i 004 Regional -------------- 756000 •i 240.8778 i 9.9400e- 2.0600e- 241.7395 Shopping Center 003 i 003 Total 2,512.646�71037 0.0215 2,521.635 5 6 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 36 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated •i 5.1437 i 0.2950 � 10.3804 1.6700e- 0.0714 i 0.0714 i i 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 i 220.9670 � 220.9670 i 0.0201 � 3.7400e- 1 222.5835 003 003 Unmitigated 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6700e- - 0.0714 - 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 - 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.4137 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Coating % ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------*------- Consumer �� 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- i 0.0143 i 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- i 205.3295 •� 003 003 003 i . Landscaping •i 0.3096 i 0.1187 10.3054 i 5.4000e- i 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 0.0161 0.0000 i 17.2540 i 004 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e- 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 003 003 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 37 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural •i 0.4137 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 4.3998 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 0.0206 i 0.1763 0.0750 i 1.1200e- 0.0143 i 0.0143 0.0143 0.0143 0.0000 i 204.1166 204.1166 i 3.9100e- 3.7400e- 205.3295 003 003 003 i Landscaping •i 0.3096 i 0.1187 10.3054 i 5.4000e- i 0.0572 i 0.0572 i 0.0572 0.0572 0.0000 i 16.8504 16.8504 i 0.0161 0.0000 17.2540 004 Total 5.1437 0.2950 10.3804 1.6600e- 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0714 0.0000 220.9670 220.9670 0.0201 3.7400e- 222.5835 11 003 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 38 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated •1 585.8052 i 3.0183 i 0.0755 i 683.7567 - - - - - - - - - - - % --------------4------------------------------- - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 39 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low i 1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471 Rise i 1.02688 003 i•i ------- ------- 1 11 Apartments Mid 63.5252 / •i 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363 Rise i 40.0485 i General Office 7.99802 / ■i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- 11 61.6019 Building i 4.90201 ;i 003 i•i ------- ------- High Turnover (Sit 10.9272 / ■i 51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e- 1 62.8482 Down Restaurant) i 0.697482 003 i ___r ------- .�____-__ T_______ Hotel 1.26834 / •i 6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e- 7.5079 i 0.140927 ;: 003 ----------- r------- .T�____-__ T_______ Quality 2.42827 / •i 11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e- 13.9663 Restaurant i 0.154996 003 i ___________ ------- T_______ Regional 4.14806 / •i 27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e- 31.9490 Shopping Center i 2.54236 003 Total 585.8052 3.0183 0.0755 683.7567 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 40 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 7.2 Water by Land Use Mitigated Indoor/Out Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e door Use Land Use Mgal MT/yr Apartments Low 1.62885 / •1 10.9095 0.0535 1.3400e- 12.6471 Rise 1.02688 ;i i 003 '-------- -------- ------- Apartments Mid 1 63.5252 / •1 425.4719 2.0867 0.0523 493.2363 Rise 40.0485 ; -- - - - --- - - - - - - General Office 1 7.99802 / •i 53.0719 0.2627 6.5900e- i 61.6019 Building 4.90201 ;i 003 --r- ----- ------- -j--------------- * - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit 10.9272 / •i 51.2702 0.3580 8.8200e- 62.8482 Down Restaurant) i 0.697482 ;i i 003 ' -------- ------- Hotel i 1.26834 / •1 6.1633 0.0416 1.0300e- i 7.5079 0.140927 'i 003 -- - - - - --- - - - - - - Quality 2.42827 / •i 11.3934 0.0796 1.9600e- 13.9663 Restaurant i 0.154996 ;i i 003 ---------- --------------- Regional 4.14806 / •i 27.5250 0.1363 3.4200e- 31.9490 Shopping Center 2.54236 ;i i 003 Total 585.8052 j 3.0183 j 0.0755 683.7567 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 41 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual CategoryNear Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e MT/yr Mitigated •i 207.8079 i 12.2811 i 0.0000 1 514.8354 - - - - - - - - - - - % --------------+------------------------------ - - - - - - - Unmitigated •• 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 42 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low 11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834 Rise •� i • '-------'------- Apartments Mid i 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513 Rise •� -------- i -------- ------- '------- GeneralOffice i 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 i 21.0464 Building i •� - ------ �i------- '------- '------- *------- High Turnover (Sit 428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430 Down Restaurant)1 •� • '-------'------- Hotel i 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694 __ i i Quality 7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712 Restaurant i •� • -------- ------- 58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706 Shopping Center i •� Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 43 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual 8.2 Waste by Land Use Mitigated Waste Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Disposed Land Use tons MT/yr Apartments Low 11.5 •1 2.3344 0.1380 0.0000 5.7834 Rise •� i • '-------'------- Apartments Mid i 448.5 •i 91.0415 5.3804 0.0000 i 225.5513 Rise •� -------- i -------- ------- '------- GeneralOffice i 41.85 •1 8.4952 0.5021 0.0000 i 21.0464 Building i •� - ------ �i------- '------- '------- *------- High Turnover (Sit 428.4 •1 86.9613 5.1393 0.0000 215.4430 Down Restaurant)1 •� '-------'------- Hotel i 27.38 •1 5.5579 0.3285 0.0000 i 13.7694 __ i i Quality 7.3 •i 1.4818 0.0876 0.0000 3.6712 Restaurant i •� • - ' - - - - - - -'- - - - - - - Regional 58.8 •i 11.9359 0.7054 0.0000 29.5706 Shopping Center i •� Total 207.8079 12.2811 0.0000 514.8354 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment Fire Pumps and Emergency Generators Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Hours/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CaIEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 44 of 44 Date: 1/12/2021 2:26 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Annual Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 i 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_ h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 High ----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------- - - - - --- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 + -----------------------------_------------------------------_- Hotel 50.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = - ---;-------------- - - - - - - Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 ------ - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = --- ----;-------------- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 _ --- - - - - -p--------------------_------------------------------ A Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + ----------------------------- = --- ----;------------- - - - - - - Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 ---- - - - - ---------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Apartments artments Mid Rise 975.00 + ----- -------- --------- -i------------------+--------------- Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 i 2789 ------------------------------_------------------------------_ ----------------------- - - - - -- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Trips and VMT - Local hire provision Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces -----r------------------------------ FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ r-------------------------------------------------------- NumberWood 1.25 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------ ------------------------- NumberWood r 48.75 0.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------r----------------------------- -------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- ST_TR 158.37 79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- ST_TR ---------------------------------T-------------------------- } 94.36 63.99 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 49.97 10.74 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 6.07 6.16 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.86 4.18 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 1.05 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 131.84 78.27 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.95 3.20 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2561 46.4415 31.4494 0.0636 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 i 6,163.416 6,163.416 1.9475 0.0000 6,212.103 i i � i i i 2022 •i 4.5441 38.8811 40.8776 0.1240 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 i 12,493.44 12,493.44 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57 i i i i i 03 03 07 2023 •i 4.1534 i 25.7658 38.7457 i 0.1206 7.0088 0.7592 i 7.7679 1.8799 i 0.7136 2.5935 0.0000 i 12,150.48 12,150.48 i 0.9589 0.0000 12,174.46 2024 •1 237.0219 i 9.5478 14.9642 i 0.0239 1.2171 0.4694 i 1.2875 0.3229 i 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 i 2,313.180 2,313.180 i 0.7166 0.0000 2,331.095 8 i 8 i i i 6 Maximum 237.0219 46.4415 40.8776 0.1240 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,493.44 12,493.44 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57 11 03 03 07 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2561 46.4415 31.4494 0.0636 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 i 6,163.416 6,163.416 1.9475 0.0000 6,212.103 i i � i i i 2022 •i 4.5441 38.8811 40.8776 0.1240 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 i 12,493.44 12,493.44 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57 i i i i i 03 03 07 2023 •i 4.1534 i 25.7658 38.7457 i 0.1206 7.0088 0.7592 i 7.7679 1.8799 i 0.7136 2.5935 0.0000 i 12,150.48 12,150.48 i 0.9589 0.0000 12,174.46 2024 •1 237.0219 i 9.5478 14.9642 i 0.0239 1.2171 0.4694 i 1.2875 0.3229 i 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 i 2,313.180 2,313.180 i 0.7166 0.0000 2,331.095 8 i 8 i i i 5 Maximum 237.0219 46.4415 40.8776 0.1240 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,493.44 12,493.44 1.9485 0.0000 12,518.57 03 03 07 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 i i � � i � i i 50 50 i 92 --------------- Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 i 2 i i i 7 Mobile •1 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 i 46.2951 12.2950 i 0.3119 12.6070 i 50,306.60 50,306.60 i 2.1807 50,361.12 08 34 i 34 � � i Total 41.1168 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 76,811.18 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87 11 762 16 16 86 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 88.4430 i 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 i 0.4874 0.3300 i 18,259.11 �� ■ 50 50 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 i 8,405.638 '� i i i i i i i i i i i ■ 2 2 i 7 Mobile 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 i 46.2951 12.2950 i 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 50,306.60 i 2.1807 i 50,361.12 i ■ 34 34 i 08 Total 41.1168 67.2262 207.5497 0.6278 45.9592 2.4626 48.4217 12.2950 2.4385 14.7336 0.0000 76,811.18 76,811.18 2.8282 0.4832 77,025.87 16 16 86 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition !9/1/2021 110/12/2021 5 30: i i _ 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation !10/13/2021 i11/9/2021 5 20: i i _ 3 •Grading +Grading !11/10/2021 i1/11/2022 5 45: i i _ 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction ! 1/12/2022 :12/12/2023 5: 500: i i _ 5 :Paving +Paving ! 12/13/2023 i 1/30/2024 5: 35: + I 1 1 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating -1/31/2024 -3/19/2024 5, 35- Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators ; 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators ; 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders ; 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders ; 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers ; 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment ; 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers ; 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00 0.001 458.00; 10.00: 6.90; 20.00;LD_Mix IHDT_Mix EHHDT - - - - - - - - - - - - - Site Preparation 7; --------- I, 18.00: - - 0.001 - - - - - - i 0.00: - - - - - - - - - - - 10.00: - - - - - - - - - - 6.90; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20.00;LD_Mix --------------------- ;HDT_Mix ?HHDT �- --------------- ° Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 10.00: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction v -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 10.00: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- ;HHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 10.00: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 10.00, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 3.3074 , 0.0000 , 3.3074 , 0.5008 , 0.0000 ; 0.5008 � i , 0.0000 , , i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 , 31.4407 , 21.5650 , 0.0388 , , 1.5513 , 1.5513 , , 1.4411 ; 1.4411 i 3,747.944 , 3,747.944 , 1.0549 , i 3,774.317 9 i 9 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3:774.317 9 9 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 1,292.241 1,292.241 0.0877 i 1,294.433 i i � i i � � i '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 7 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0487 i 0.0313 i 0.4282 1.1800e- i 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 i 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e- i i 117.3678 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.1760 4.1265 1.3884 0.0131 0.3810 0.0135 0.3946 0.1034 0.0129 0.0912 1,411.801 f-77771,409.521 2 17,409.5211 2 1 5 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 i 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 i 31.4407 i 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 i 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 i i 3,774.317 '� i i i i i i i i i i i • 9 9 i 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3,774.317 9 9 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1273 4.0952 0.9602 0.0119 0.2669 0.0126 0.2795 0.0732 0.0120 0.0852 i 1,292.241 1,292.241 0.0877 i 1,294.433 i i � i i • � � i '� i i i i i i i i • 3 i 3 i i i 7 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0487 i 0.0313 i 0.4282 1.1800e- i 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 i 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 117.2799 117.2799 3.5200e- i i 117.3678 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.1760 4.1265 1.3884 0.0131 0.3810 0.0135 0.3946 0.1034 0.0129 0.0912 1,411.801 f-7771,409.521 2 17,409.5211 2 1 5 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 � 0.0380 i � 2.0445 � 2.0445 i � 1.8809 � 1.8809 � i 3,685.656 � 3,685.656 � 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 '� i i i i i i i i i • g 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0584 i 0.0375 i 0.5139 1.4100e- i 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 i 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- i i 140.8414 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- 140.8414 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 i 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 i g 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0584 i 0.0375 i 0.5139 1.4100e- i 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 i 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 i 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- i i 140.8414 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0584 0.0375 0.5139 1.4100e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 140.7359 140.7359 4.2200e- 140.8414 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 � 0.0620 i � 1.9853 � 1.9853 i � 1.8265 � 1.8265 � i 6,007.043 � 6,007.043 � 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 777 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0649 i 0.0417 i 0.5710 1.5700e- i 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 1 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- i i 156.4904 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e- 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- 156.4904 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •i 8.6733 0.0000 i 8.6733 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 i 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 '� i i i i i i i i i i i • 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0649 i 0.0417 i 0.5710 1.5700e- i 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- i i 156.4904 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0649 0.0417 0.5710 1.5700e- 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 156.3732 156.3732 4.6900e- 156.4904 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 � 0.0621 i � 1.6349 � 1.6349 i � 1.5041 1.5041 � i 6,011.410 � 6,011.410 � 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i i i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0607 i 0.0376 i 0.5263 1.5100e- i 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- i i 150.9813 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e- 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- 150.9813 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 i 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0607 i 0.0376 i 0.5263 1.5100e- i 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- i i 150.9813 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0607 0.0376 0.5263 1.5100e- 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 150.8754 150.8754 4.2400e- 150.9813 003 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 i 0.0269 0.8090 i 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.4079 i 13.2032 i 3.4341 0.0364 i 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 i 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 i 3,896.548 3,896.548 0.2236 i i 3,902.138 2 i 2 i i i 4 Worker •i 2.4299 i 1.5074 i 21.0801 0.0607 i 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 i 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 i 6,042.558 6,042.558 0.1697 i i 6,046.800 5 i 5 i i 1 0 Total 2.8378 14.7106 24.5142 0.0971 7.0087 0.0741 7.0828 1.8799 0.0691 9,939.106 0.3933 9,948.938 [7779,939.106 7 7 4 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 i 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.4079 i 13.2032 i 3.4341 0.0364 i 0.9155 0.0248 0.9404 i 0.2636 0.0237 0.2873 i 3,896.548 3,896.548 0.2236 i i 3,902.138 2 i 2 i i i 4 Worker •i 2.4299 i 1.5074 i 21.0801 0.0607 i 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 i 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 i 6,042.558 6,042.558 0.1697 i i 6,046.800 5 i 5 i i 1 0 Total 2.8378 14.7106 24.5142 0.0971 7.0087 0.0741 7.0828 1.8799 0.0691 9,939.106 0.3933 9,948.938 [7779,939.106 7 7 4 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 � i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 i i i i i i i i 9 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.658T 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 j j j j j j 9 9 1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3027 i 10.0181 i 3.1014 0.0352 i 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 i 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 i 3,773.876 3,773.876 0.1982 i i 3,778.830 2 i 2 i i i 0 Worker •i 2.2780 i 1.3628 i 19.4002 0.0584 i 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 i 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 i 5,821.402 5,821.402 0.1529 5,825.225 8 i 8 i i i 4 Total 2.5807 11.3809 22.5017 0.0936 7.0088 0.0595 7.0682 1.8799 0.0552 1.9350 9,595.279 9,595.279 0.3511 9,604.055 0 0 4 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 9 i 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 11 9 9 1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3027 i 10.0181 i 3.1014 0.0352 i 0.9156 0.0116 0.9271 i 0.2636 0.0111 0.2747 i 3,773.876 3,773.876 0.1982 i i 3,778.830 2 i 2 i i 1 0 Worker •i 2.2780 i 1.3628 i 19.4002 0.0584 i 6.0932 0.0479 6.1411 i 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 i 5,821.402 5,821.402 0.1529 i i 5,825.225 8 i 8 i i i 4 Total 2.5807 11.3809 22.5017 0.0936 7.0088 0.0595 7.0682 1.8799 0.0552 1.9350 9,595.279 9,595.279 0.3511 9,604.055 0 0 4 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 '� i i i i i i i i 1 i 1 i i i 6 • Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0427 i 0.0255 i 0.3633 1.0900e- i 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- i i 109.0866 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e- 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- 109.0866 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 i 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 1 i 1 i i i 6 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 11 1 1 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0427 i 0.0255 i 0.3633 1.0900e- i 0.1141 9.00OOe- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- i i 109.0866 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0427 0.0255 0.3633 1.0900e- 0.1141 9.00OOe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 109.0150 109.0150 2.8600e- 109.0866 003 004 004 003 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0403 i 0.0233 i 0.3384 1.0600e- i 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- i i 105.6992 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- 105.6992 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 i 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0403 i 0.0233 i 0.3384 1.0600e- i 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- i i 105.6992 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0403 0.0233 0.3384 1.0600e- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 105.6336 105.6336 2.6300e- 105.6992 003 004 004 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •i 236.4115 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 i 2.9700e- i i 0.0609 i 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 i 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.4296 i 0.2481 i 3.6098 0.0113 i 1.2171 � 9.4300e- 1.2266 i 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,126.758 1,126.758 0.0280 i i 1,127.458 003 003 3 3 i 3 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e- 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,126.758 1,126.758 0.0280 1,127.458 =.t.l 003 003 3 3 3 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •1 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.4296 i 0.2481 i 3.6098 0.0113 i 1.2171 � 9.4300e- 1.2266 i 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,126.758 1,126.758 0.0280 i i 1,127.458 003 003 3 3 i 3 0.4296 0.2481 3.6098 0.0113 1.2171 9.4300e- 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,126.758 1,126.758 0.0280 1,127.458 =.t.' 003 003 3 3 3 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 9.8489 i 45.4304 114.8495 i 0.4917 i 45.9592 i 0.3360 46.2951 i 12.2950 � 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 50,306.60 2.1807 i i 50,361.12 •� . 34 34 i 08 Unmitigated 9.8489 45.4304 114.8495 0.4917 45.9592 0.3360 46.2951 12.2950 0.3119 12.6070 50,306.60 • 50,306.60 • 2.1807 - 50,361.12 34 34 08 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- ......................................----------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 i 4.2573 0.0418 i i 0.5292 0.5292 i i 0.5292 0.5292 + i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 i 0.1532 1 8,405.638 Mitigated ;i . i 2 2 i 7 NaturalGas 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 • 8,355.983 • 0.1602 0.1532 • 8,405.638 Unmitigated 2 2 7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low i 1119.16 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- i 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid 35784.3 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 i 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1------------------------------------------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------ � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1283.42 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- i 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22759.9 •1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 i 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r-------1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel i 4769.72 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 i 564.4782 1 1 1 1 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 j i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 Quality 1 5057.75 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � v 1 1 1 1 T""--- 251.616 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low i 1.11916 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- i 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid i 35.7843 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 i 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1 1------- ----------------------------- -------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------71_----__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1.28342 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- i 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22.7599 .1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 i 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r------�1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel i 4.76972 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 i 564.4782 1 1 I I 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 -r------71 j i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 ------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �-------I-------1 1 1 T'------ Quality 5.05775 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T""--- 0.251616 •1 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 077 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 � 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 i i 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 i 18,259.11 50 50 92 -------------i i Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 • 18,148.59 - 0.4874 • 0.3300 • 18,259.11 50 50 92 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating•' ' i %i- ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------------------------*------- Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products •' . ' i Hearth •i 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96 i i i i i i i Landscaping •i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 i 152.1542 003 i i i i i i i i i • Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 50 50 92 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 1.6500 i 14.1000 6.0000 i 0.0900 1.1400 i 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 i 18,000.00 18,000.00 i 0.3450 1 0.3300 1 18,106.96 ---- -- - - - ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - --- - -- ------------------------------ Landscaping i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 152.1542 003 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 j j F-777000 50 50 j 92 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:29 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Summer Fire Pumos and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 1 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population General Office Building 45.00 + 1000sgft ; 1.03 45,000.00 i 0 ----------------------------_------------------------------_ h Turnover Sit Down Restaurant)36.00 High ----------------------- - - - - -- = - - ;------- - - - - --- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.83 36,000.00 -+ 0 + -----------------------------_------------------------------_- Hotel 50.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = - ---;-------------- - - - - - - Room ; 1.67 72,600.00 - 1 0 ------ - - - --y----------------_------------------------------_- Qualit Restaurant 8.00 + ---------------------- - - - - -- = --- ----;-------------- - - - - -- 1000sgft ; 0.18 8,000.00 -+ 0 _ --- - - - - -p--------------------_------------------------------ A Apartments Low Rise 25.00 + ----------------------------- = --- ----;------------- - - - - - - Dwelling Unit ; 1.56 25,000.00 -+ 72 ---- - - - - ---------------------_------------------------------_------------------------------= Apartments artments Mid Rise 975.00 + ----- -------- --------- -i------------------+--------------- Dwelling Unit ; 25.66 975,000.00 i 2789 ------------------------------_------------------------------_ ----------------------- - - - - -- --------------}------------------E------------- Regional Shopping Center 56.00 1000sgft 1.29 56,000.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 33 Climate Zone 9 Operational Year 2028 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2Intensity 702.44 CH4Intensity 0.029 N20Intensity 0.006 (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) (lb/MWhr) 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 2 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Project Characteristics - Consistent with the DEIR's model. Land Use - See SWAPE comment regarding residential and retail land uses. Construction Phase - See SWAPE comment regarding individual construction phase lengths. Demolition - Consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding demolition. Vehicle Trips - Saturday trips consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding weekday and Sunday trips. Woodstoves - Woodstoves and wood -burning fireplaces consistent with the DEIR's model. See SWAPE comment regarding gas fireplaces. Energy Use - Construction Off -road Equipment Mitigation - See SWAPE comment on construction -related mitigation. Area Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Water Mitigation - See SWAPE comment regarding operational mitigation measures. Trips and VMT - Local hire provision Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblFireplaces FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces -----r------------------------------ FireplaceWood Mass 1,019.20 0.00 ---------------------------- tblFireplaces ------------------------------ r-------------------------------------------------------- NumberWood 1.25 0.00 -------------p-------------_------------------- tblFire laces ------------ ------------------------- NumberWood r 48.75 0.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------r----------------------------- -------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tbITripsAndVMT ------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------- tblTripsAndVMT ------------------------------ --------------------------------------- WorkerTripLength r 14.70 10.00 ----------------------------_----------------- tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 7.16 6.17 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------r------------------------------------------------------- ST_TR 6.39 3.87 ----------------------------_-----------------------------' tblVehicleTrips --------------------------------------- ST_TR r 2.46 1.39 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips ------------------------------t------------------------------ -------------------------- ST_TR 158.37 79.82 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 3 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 8.19 3.75 ----------------------------- tblVehicleTrips Y---------------------------- ST_TR �-----------------------------T-------------------------- } 94.36 63.99 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR } 49.97 10.74 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 6.07 6.16 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.86 4.18 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 1.05 0.69 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 131.84 78.27 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 5.95 3.20 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 72.16 57.65 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR } 25.24 6.39 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.59 5.83 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 6.65 4.13 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 11.03 6.41 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 127.15 65.80 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 8.17 3.84 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 89.95 62.64 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR } 42.70 9.43 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 1.25 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic } 48.75 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves Wood stove DayYear } 25.00 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass i 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWood Mass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 4 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2621 i 46.4460 31.4068 i 0.0635 18.2032 � 2.0456 i 20.2488 9.9670 i 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 i 6,154.337 6,154.337 i 1.9472 � 0.0000 6,203.018 7 i 7 i i i 6 ------------- 2022 •i 4.7966 38.8851 39.6338 0.1195 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 i 12,035.34 12,035.34 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60 i � i � � i � i � � i 40 40 i 13 2023 •i 4.3939 i 25.8648 37.5031 i 0.1162 � 7.0088 0.7598 i 7.7685 1.8799 i 0.7142 2.5940 0.0000 i 11,710.40 11,710.40 i 0.9617 0.0000 11,734.44 2024 •i 237.0656 i 9.5503 14.9372 i 0.0238 1.2171 � 0.4694 i 1.2875 0.3229 i 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 i 2,307.051 2,307.051 i 0.7164 0.0000 2,324.962 '� i i i i i i i i • 7 i 7 i i i 7 Maximum 237.0656 46.4460 39.6338 0.1195 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,035.34 12,035.34 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60 11 40 40 13 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 5 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Year lb/day lb/day 2021 •i 4.2621 i 46.4460 31.4068 i 0.0635 18.2032 � 2.0456 i 20.2488 9.9670 i 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 i 6,154.337 6,154.337 i 1.9472 � 0.0000 6,203.018 7 i 7 i i i 6 ------------- 2022 •i 4.7966 38.8851 39.6338 0.1195 8.8255 1.6361 10.4616 3.6369 1.5052 5.1421 0.0000 i 12,035.34 12,035.34 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60 i � i � � i � i � � i 40 40 i 13 2023 •i 4.3939 i 25.8648 37.5031 i 0.1162 � 7.0088 0.7598 i 7.7685 1.8799 i 0.7142 2.5940 0.0000 i 11,710.40 11,710.40 i 0.9617 0.0000 11,734.44 2024 •i 237.0656 i 9.5503 14.9372 i 0.0238 1.2171 � 0.4694 i 1.2875 0.3229 i 0.4319 0.4621 0.0000 i 2,307.051 2,307.051 i 0.7164 0.0000 2,324.962 '� i i i i i i i i • 7 i 7 i i i 7 Maximum 237.0656 46.4460 39.6338 0.1195 18.2032 2.0456 20.2488 9.9670 1.8820 11.8490 0.0000 12,035.34 12,035.34 1.9482 0.0000 12,060.60 11 40 40 13 ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio-0O2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 6 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 i i � � i � i i 50 50 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 i 2 i i i 7 Mobile •i 9.5233 i 45.9914 � 110.0422 i 0.4681 � 45.9592 � 0.3373 i 46.2965 � 12.2950 i 0.3132 12.6083 i 47,917.80 � 47,917.80 i 2.1953 � � 47,972.68 '� 05 05 i 39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 74,422.37 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44 87 87 17 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I I Category lb/day lb/day Area •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 88.4430 i 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 i 0.4874 0.3300 i 18,259.11 �� ■ 50 50 i 92 Energy •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 4.2573 i 0.0418 0.5292 i 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 0.1532 i 8,405.638 '� i i i i i i i i i i i ■ 2 2 i 7 Mobile 9.5233 i 45.9914 110.0422 i 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 i 46.2965 12.2950 i 0.3132 12.6083 � 47,917.80 47,917.80 i 2.1953 47,972.68 i ■ 05 05 i 39 Total 40.7912 67.7872 202.7424 0.6043 45.9592 2.4640 48.4231 12.2950 2.4399 14.7349 0.0000 74,422.37 74,422.37 2.8429 0.4832 74,637.44 87 87 17 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 7 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio-0O2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Percent 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Reduction 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 •Demolition !Demolition !9/1/2021 110/12/2021 5 30: i i _ 2 Site Preparation +Site Preparation !10/13/2021 i11/9/2021 5 20: i i _ 3 •Grading +Grading !11/10/2021 i1/11/2022 5 45: i i _ 4 •Building Construction +Building Construction ! 1/12/2022 :12/12/2023 5: 500: i i _ 5 :Paving +Paving ! 12/13/2023 i 1/30/2024 5: 35: + I 1 1 6 -Architectural Coating :Architectural Coating -1/31/2024 -3/19/2024 5, 35- Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 112.5 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 2,025,000; Residential Outdoor: 675,000; Non -Residential Indoor: 326,400; Non -Residential Outdoor: 108,800; Striped Parking Area: 0 (Architectural Coating — sgft) OffRoad Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 8 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor Demolition 'Concrete/Industrial Saws ; 1 ; 8.001 81 • 0.73 -------------------------- �- - -------------------------- ----------- Demolition +Excavators ; 3 8.001 158• 0.38 + _ i _ Demolition 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 21 8.001 247• 0.40 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 41 8.001 97• 0.37 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Excavators ; 2 8.001 158• 0.38 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Graders ; 1 8.001 187• 0.41 -------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1 8.001 247• 0.40 ---------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------i ------ - - - - --------------- ----------- Grading 'Scrapers ; 21 8.001 367• 0.48 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 2 8.001 97• 0.37 ---------------------------- _ i -------------------------------------------------------------------- -------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Cranes ; 11 7.001 231, 0.29 �_ i - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3 8.001 89• 0.20 + _ __ i i _ Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1 8.001 _ 84• 0.74 �_ _ i - - - - -------------------------- ----------- Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 3 7.001 _ 97• 0.37 + __ i i Building Construction 'Welders ; 1 8.001 46• 0.45 �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving +Pavers ; 2 8.001 130• 0.42 --------------------------- �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Paving Equipment ; 21 8.001 132• 0.36 i �- - - - -------------------------- ----------- Paving 'Rollers ; 2 8.001 80• 0.38 ---------------------------- --------------------------*-----------------F------------ r------------- ----------- Architectural Coating •Air Compressors 1 • 6.00• 78• 0.48 Trips and VMT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 9 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Phase Name I Offroad Equipment I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor I Hauling Count Number Number Number Length Length Length Class Vehicle Class Vehicle Class Demolition A 6; 15.00" , 0.001 458.00; 10.00: 6.90; 20.00:LD_Mix 1HDT_Mix (HHDT - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - • Site Preparation - - - - - - - - - - - - - �_ 7; ________ __'------ -- 18.00: I - - 0.001 - - - - - - i 0.00: - - - - - - - - - ' - - 10.00: - - - - - - - - - - 6.90; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 20.00;LD_Mix - - - - - - - - - ;HDT_Mix - T - - - - - - - - - ;HHDT --------------- ° �- Grading -------------; 8; i------------ 20.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------�- 0.00: -------------------------- 10.00: 6.90; 20.00.LD_Mix ------' iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT ----------------° �- Building Construction v -------------=---------------''''-, 9; i----------i- 801.00- I --------i 143.001 ,- 0.00: ---------' --------- �- 10.00: ------------------------�----------' 6.90, 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -------- ;HHDT ° �- Paving -------------- 6; - i------------ 15.00: --------i 0.001 ,----------4- 0.00: ---------- 10.00: 6.90; -------------' 20.00;LD_Mix iHDT_Mix -- EHHDT i f I Architectural Coating ; 1; 160.00, 0.00, 0.00, 10.00, 6.90, 20.00,LD_Mix ;HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust ;1 , , , , 3.3074 , 0.0000 , 3.3074 , 0.5008 , 0.0000 ; 0.5008 � i , 0.0000 , , i 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1651 , 31.4407 , 21.5650 , 0.0388 , , 1.5513 , 1.5513 , , 1.4411 ; 1.4411 i 3,747.944 , 3,747.944 , 1.0549 , i 3,774.317 9 i 9 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3:774.317 9 9 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 10 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 1,269.855 1,269.855 0.0908 i 1,272.125 i i � i � i i '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i i 2 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0532 i 0.0346 i 0.3963 1.1100e- i 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 i 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 i 110.4707 110.4707 3.3300e- i 1 110.5539 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.1835 4.1800 1.4144 0.0128 0.3810 0.0137 0.3948 0.1034 0.0131 0.1165 1,380.326 1,380.326 0.0941 1,382.679 2 2 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 3.3074 0.0000 3.3074 i 0.5008 0.0000 0.5008 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.1551 i 31.4407 i 21.5650 0.0388 1.5513 1.5513 1.4411 1.4411 0.0000 i 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 i i 3,774.317 '� i i i i i i i i i i i • 9 9 i 4 Total 3.1651 31.4407 21.5650 0.0388 3.3074 1.5513 4.8588 0.5008 1.4411 1.9419 0.0000 3,747.944 3,747.944 1.0549 3,774.317 9 9 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 11 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.2 Demolition - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.1304 4.1454 1.0182 0.0117 0.2669 0.0128 0.2797 0.0732 0.0122 0.0854 i 1,269.855 1,269.855 0.0908 i 1,272.125 i i � i � i • i '� i i i i i i i i • 5 i 5 i i i 2 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0532 i 0.0346 i 0.3963 1.1100e- i 0.1141 9.5000e- 0.1151 i 0.0303 8.8000e- 0.0311 i 110.4707 110.4707 3.3300e- i 1 110.5539 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.1835 4.1800 1.4144 0.0128 0.3810 0.0137 0.3948 0.1034 0.0131 0.0941 1,382.679 f-77771,380.326 2 17,380.326 2 1 1 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 i 9.9307 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 � 0.0380 i � 2.0445 � 2.0445 i � 1.8809 � 1.8809 � i 3,685.656 � 3,685.656 � 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 '� i i i i i i i i i • g 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 12 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0638 i 0.0415 i 0.4755 1.3300e- i 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 i 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- i i 132.6646 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- 132.6646 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 i i i i 18.0663 0.0000 18.0663 9.9307 i 0.0000 9.9307 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.8882 i 40.4971 i 21.1543 0.0380 2.0445 2.0445 1.8809 1.8809 0.0000 i 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 i i 3,715.457 i g 9 3 Total 3.8882 40.4971 21.1543 0.0380 18.0663 2.0445 20.1107 9.9307 1.8809 11.8116 0.0000 3,685.656 3,685.656 1.1920 3,715.457 9 9 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 13 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.3 Site Preparation - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0638 i 0.0415 i 0.4755 1.3300e- i 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 i 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- i i 132.6646 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0638 0.0415 0.4755 1.3300e- 0.1369 1.1400e- 0.1381 0.0363 1.0500e- 0.0374 132.5649 132.5649 3.9900e- 132.6646 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 � 0.0620 i � 1.9853 � 1.9853 i � 1.8265 � 1.8265 � i 6,007.043 � 6,007.043 � 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 777 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 14 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2021 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0709 i 0.0462 i 0.5284 1.4800e- i 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- i i 147.4051 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e- 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- 147.4051 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 4.1912 i 46.3998 i 30.8785 0.0620 1.9853 1.9853 1.8265 1.8265 0.0000 i 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 i i 6,055.613 i i i 4 4 i 4 Total 4.1912 46.3998 30.8785 0.0620 8.6733 1.9853 10.6587 3.5965 1.8265 5.4230 0.0000 6,007.043 6,007.043 1.9428 6,055.613 4 4 4 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 15 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2021 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0709 i 0.0462 i 0.5284 1.4800e- i 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- i i 147.4051 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0709 0.0462 0.5284 1.4800e- 0.1521 1.2700e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1700e- 0.0415 147.2943 147.2943 4.4300e- 147.4051 003 003 003 003 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 � 0.0621 i � 1.6349 � 1.6349 i � 1.5041 1.5041 � i 6,011.410 � 6,011.410 � 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i i i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 16 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0665 i 0.0416 i 0.4861 1.4300e- i 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.000Oe- i i 142.2207 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e- 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.000Oe- 142.2207 003 003 003 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust •1 8.6733 i 0.0000 8.6733 i 3.5965 i 0.0000 3.5965 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 3.6248 i 38.8435 i 29.0415 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 i 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 i i 6,060.015 i i i 5 5 i 8 Total 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 0.0621 8.6733 1.6349 10.3082 3.5965 1.5041 5.1006 0.0000 6,011.410 6,011.410 1.9442 6,060.015 5 5 8 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 17 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.4 Grading - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0665 i 0.0416 i 0.4861 1.4300e- i 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 i 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.00OOe- i i 142.2207 003 003 003 003 i Total 0.0665 0.0416 0.4861 1.4300e- 0.1521 1.2300e- 0.1534 0.0404 1.1300e- 0.0415 142.1207 142.1207 4.00OOe- 142.2207 003 003 003 003 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 i 0.0269 0.8090 i 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 18 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.4284 i 13.1673 i 3.8005 � 0.0354 i 0.9155 � 0.0256 0.9412 i 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 3,789.075 0.2381 i i 3,795.028 0 i 0 i i i 3 Worker •i 2.6620 i 1.6677 i 19.4699 0.0571 i 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 i 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 i 5,691.935 5,691.935 0.1602 i i 5,695.940 4 i 4 i i i 8 Total 3.0904 14.8350 23.2704 0.0926 7.0087 0.0749 7.0836 1.8799 0.0699 1.9498 9,481.010 9,481.010 0.3984 9,490.969 4 4 1 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.7062 i 15.6156 i 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 i 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 i i 2,569.632 6 i 6 i i i 2 Total 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632 6 6 2 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 19 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2022 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.4284 i 13.1673 i 3.8005 � 0.0354 i 0.9155 � 0.0256 0.9412 i 0.2636 0.0245 0.2881 3,789.075 3,789.075 0.2381 i i 3,795.028 0 i 0 i i i 3 Worker •i 2.6620 i 1.6677 i 19.4699 0.0571 i 6.0932 0.0493 6.1425 i 1.6163 0.0454 1.6617 i 5,691.935 5,691.935 0.1602 i i 5,695.940 4 i 4 i i i 8 Total 3.0904 14.8350 23.2704 0.0926 7.0087 0.0749 7.0836 1.8799 0.0699 1.9498 9,481.010 9,481.010 0.3984 9,490.969 4 4 1 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 � i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 i i i i i i i i 9 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.658T 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 j j j j j j 9 9 1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 20 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3183 i 9.9726 i 3.3771 0.0343 i 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 i 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 i 3,671.400 3,671.400 0.2096 i i 3,676.641 7 i 7 i i i 7 Worker •i 2.5029 i 1.5073 i 17.8820 0.0550 i 6.0932 0.0479 � 6.1411 i 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 5,483.797 0.1442 i i 5,487.402 4 i 4 i i i 0 Total 2.8211 11.4799 21.2591 0.0893 7.0088 0.0601 7.0688 1.8799 0.0557 777 9,155.198 9,155.198 0.3538 9,164.043 1 1 7 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.5728 i 14.3849 i 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i i 2,570.406 9 i 9 i 1 Total 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 2,570.406 11 9 9 1 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 21 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.5 Building Construction - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.3183 i 9.9726 i 3.3771 0.0343 i 0.9156 0.0122 0.9277 i 0.2636 0.0116 0.2752 i 3,671.400 3,671.400 0.2096 i i 3,676.641 '� i i i i i i i i • 7 i 7 i i i 7 Worker •i 2.5029 i 1.5073 i 17.8820 0.0550 i 6.0932 0.0479 � 6.1411 i 1.6163 0.0441 1.6604 5,483.797 5,483.797 0.1442 i i 5,487.402 '� i i i i i i i i • 4 i 4 i i i 0 Total 2.8211 11.4799 21.2591 0.0893 7.0088 0.0601 7.0688 1.8799 0.0557 777 9,155.198 9,155.198 0.3538 9,164.043 1 1 7 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 '� i i i i i i i i 1 i 1 i i i 6 • Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 22 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2023 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0469 i 0.0282 i 0.3349 1.0300e- i 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- i i 102.7603 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e- 0.1141 9.000Oe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 102.7603 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 1.0327 i 10.1917 i 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 i 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 i i 2,225.433 '� i i i i i i i i 1 i 1 i i i 6 • Paving •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 Total 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433 1 1 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 23 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2023 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0469 i 0.0282 i 0.3349 1.0300e- i 0.1141 9.00OOe- 0.1150 i 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- i i 102.7603 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0469 0.0282 0.3349 1.0300e- 0.1141 9.00OOe- 0.1150 0.0303 8.3000e- 0.0311 102.6928 102.6928 2.7000e- 102.7603 003 004 004 003 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 14.6258 i 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 i i 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 i 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 24 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.000Oe- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- i 99.5663 i i i i i 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.000Oe- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 99.5663 003 004 004 003 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Off -Road •i 0.9882 i 9.5246 i 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 i 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 i i 2,225.396 2 i 2 i i i 3 Paving •i 0.0000 i i i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Total 0.9882 9.5246 14.6258 0.0228 0.4685 0.4685 0.4310 0.4310 0.0000 2,207.547 2,207.547 0.7140 2,225.396 11 2 2 3 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 25 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.6 Paving - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.00OOe- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- i 99.5663 i i i i i 003 004 004 003 i Total 0.0444 0.0257 0.3114 1.00OOe- 0.1141 8.8000e- 0.1150 0.0303 8.1000e- 0.0311 99.5045 99.5045 2.4700e- 99.5663 003 004 004 003 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •i 236.4115 0.0000 i 0.0000 i i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 i 2.9700e- i i 0.0609 i 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 i 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 26 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Unmitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 ��--------------------------------------------'----------------------- --+ ------� -------------'--------------- Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.4734 i 0.2743 i 3.3220 0.0107 i 1.2171 � 9.4300e- 1.2266 i 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,061.381 � 1,061.381 0.0264 i i 1,062.041 003 003 8 8 i 0 Total 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e- 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,061.381 1,061.381 0.0264 1,062.041 003 003 8 8 0 Mitigated Construction On -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating •1 236.4115 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 I Off -Road •i 0.1808 i 1.2188 i 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 i i 281.8443 003 Total 236.5923 1.2188 1.8101 2.9700e- 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0609 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0159 281.8443 003 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 27 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 3.7 Architectural Coating - 2024 Mitigated Construction Off -Site ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e I I PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total I Category lb/day lb/day Hauling •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i i 0.0000 � ---------------------------------------------'------------------------ --+ ------� -------------'--------------- Vendor •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 � i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 i i 0.0000 Worker •i 0.4734 i 0.2743 i 3.3220 0.0107 i 1.2171 � 9.4300e- 1.2266 i 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,061.381 � 1,061.381 0.0264 i i 1,062.041 003 003 8 8 i 0 Total 0.4734 0.2743 3.3220 0.0107 1.2171 9.4300e- 1.2266 0.3229 8.6800e- 0.3315 1,061.381 1,061.381 0.0264 1,062.041 003 003 8 8 0 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 28 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 9.5233 i 45.9914 i 110.0422 i 0.4681 45.9592 i 0.3373 , 46.2965 i 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 i 47,917.80 47,917.80 2.1953 i : 47,972.68 •� . 05 05 i 39 Unmitigated 9.5233 45.9914 110.0422 0.4681 45.9592 0.3373 46.2965 12.2950 0.3132 12.6083 - 47,917.80 47,917.80 • 2.1953 - 47,972.68 05 05 39 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Apartments Low Rise ; 145.75 ; 154.25 154.00 506,227 506,227 ......................................-------------------------------- -----------------------:------------------------ Apartments Mid Rise ; 4,026.75 ; 3,773.25 4075.50 13,660,065 13,660,065 ------------T-----------Y------------------------:-------------------------- ......................................----------- General Office Building ; 288.45 ; 62.55 31.05 706,812 706,812 ......................................--- ----- ------------ - ---- - ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- -r - High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant) ; 2,368.80 ; 2,873.52 2817.72 3,413,937 3,413,937 .................................................. ---------- - ------- ---------------------- ----------------------- -r - Ho.............�---.----192.00 1--T----------- y-------------------------- 445,703 .. Quality Restaurant + 501.12 511.92 461.20 707,488 707,488 ......................................-------------------------- - - - - -- -----------------------:------------------------ Regional Shopping Center ; 528.08 601.44 357.84 1,112,221 1,112,221 Total 8,050.95 8,164.43 8,057.31 20,552,452 20,552,452 4.3 Trip Type Information CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 29 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose % I Land Use I H-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW IH-W or C-W I H-S or C-C I H-O or C-NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by I Apartments Low Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 Y 40.20 : 1 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ........................------------------__ __ __ ? _ T _ -------- ---- ------------- General Office Building 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 48.00 19.00 77 ; 19 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down ; 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 8.50 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 72.50 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 37 - - - - - - - - - - 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 43 .......:......r........�------------------ -- ... ? r--------------.... T.. -------- .r.. -------- ---- r... ------------- Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 ; 58 ; 38 ; 4 .......................• - - - - - - - - - - Quality Restaurant 16.60 - - - - - - - - - 8.40 T - - - - - - - - - . 6.90 - - - - - - - - 12.00 i' - - - - - - - - T 1 69.00 - - - - - - - - - - - - 19.00 - - - - - - - - - 38 - - - - - - - - - - 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 44 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 4.4 Fleet Mix Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH Apartments Low Rise 0.543088} 0.044216; 0.209971; 0.116369; 0.014033; 0.006332; 0.021166; 0.033577; 0.002613; 0.001817; 0.005285; 0.0007121 0.000821 r Apartments Mid Rise 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 r General Office Building 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712: 0.000821 r 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - -;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;--------------- ;----------------+ - - - - - - - - High Turnover (Sit Down 0.5430881 0.044216: 0.209971: 0.116369: 0.014033: 0.006332: 0.021166: 0.033577: 0.002613: 0.001817: 0.005285: 0.000712: 0.000821 Restaurant) ....................... f........*-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------T-------� _ ..... _ . -0.002613 -0.001817 -0.005285 Hotel 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.014033, 0.006332 0.021166 0.033577 0.000712 0.000821 -----------------------_----------------------- Quality Restaurant 0.5430881 0.0442161 0.2099711 0.1163691 0.0140331 0.0063321 0.0211661 0.0335771 0.0026131 0.0018171 0.0052851 0.000712. 0.000821 Regional Shopping Center 0.543088. 0.044216' 0.209971' 0.116369' 0.014033' 0.006332' 0.021166' 0.033577' 0.002613' 0.001817' 0.005285' 0.000712' 0.000821 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 30 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG I NOx I CO I S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 I N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas •i 0.7660 i 6.7462 i 4.2573 0.0418 i i 0.5292 0.5292 i i 0.5292 0.5292 + i 8,355.983 8,355.983 i 0.1602 i 0.1532 1 8,405.638 Mitigated ;i . i 2 2 i 7 NaturalGas 0.7660 6.7462 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 • 8,355.983 • 0.1602 0.1532 • 8,405.638 Unmitigated 2 2 7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 31 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low i 1119.16 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- i 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid 35784.3 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 i 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1------------------------------------------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------ � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1283.42 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- i 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22759.9 •1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 i 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r-------1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel i 4769.72 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 i 564.4782 1 1 1 1 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 j i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 Quality 1 5057.75 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � v 1 1 1 1 T""--- 251.616 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center .1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i i 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 32 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Mitigated NaturalGa ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e s Use PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 I Total I I Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Apartments Low i 1.11916 4 0.0121 0.1031 0.0439 6.6000e- 8.3400e- i 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 8.3400e- 1 131.6662 131.6662 2.5200e- 2.4100e- 1 132.4486 Rise i '1 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 ----------- 1 i 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 1----------------------- �-------------------------------I-------------- 1-------�-------�---------------------- Apartments Mid i 35.7843 .1 0.3859 1 3.2978 1 1.4033 1 0.0211 1 1 0.2666 1 0.2666 1 1 0.2666 0.2666 1 4,209.916 1 4,209.916 1 0.0807 1 0.0772 i 4,234.933 1 Rise ---------- _ ; 1 I 1 I I I I 1 . 4 I 4 1 I 1 9 1 ; 1 1 1------- ----------------------------- -------�-------�--------------- ------1------- --------------------- r------71_----__ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T General Office 1.28342 .1 0.0138 1 0.1258 1 0.1057 1 7.5000e- 1 1 9.5600e- 1 9.5600e- 1 1 9.5600e- 9.5600e- 1 150.9911 1 150.9911 1 2.8900e- 1 2.7700e- i 151.8884 Building i 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 003 1 003 1 -----------1 ------7------- '1------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------- � 1 ---------------------1 r11 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �I1 1 1 T'------ High Turnover (Sit 22.7599 .1 0.2455 1 2.2314 1 1.8743 1 0.0134 1 1 0.1696 1 0.1696 1 1 0.1696 0.1696 1 2,677.634 1 2,677.634 1 0.0513 1 0.0491 i 2,693.546 Down Restaurant) i 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 . 2 1 2 1 1 1 0 ---1 ' 1 I I I I I I I , I I I 1 r------�1------ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � T Hotel i 4.76972 .1 0.0514 1 0.4676 1 0.3928 1 2.8100e- 1 1 0.0355 1 0.0355 1 1 0.0355 0.0355 1 561.1436 1 561.1436 1 0.0108 1 0.0103 i 564.4782 1 1 I I 003 I I I I I 1 I I I 1 -r------71 j i 1 I I I I I I I , 1 I I I 1 ------- 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � �-------I-------1 1 1 T'------ Quality 5.05775 •1 0.0545 1 0.4959 1 0.4165 1 2.9800e- 1 1 0.0377 1 0.0377 1 1 0.0377 0.0377 1 595.0298 1 595.0298 1 0.0114 1 0.0109 1 598.5658 Restaurant ; 1 I 1 003 1 --r------71-------1 Regional 1 , I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 � � 1 1 1 1 T""--- 0.251616 •1 2.7100e- 0.0247 0.0207 1.5000e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1.8700e- 1 29.6019 29.6019 5.7000e- 5.4000e- 29.7778 Shopping Center 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i 1 ; 003 1 1 1 004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 004 1 004 1 Total 0.7660 6.7463 4.2573 0.0418 0.5292 0.5292 0.5292 077 8,355.983 8,355.983 0.1602 0.1532 8,405.638 2 2 7 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 33 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated •i 30.5020 i 15.0496 � 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 i 1.5974 i i 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 i 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 i 18,259.11 50 50 92 -------------i i Unmitigated 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 • 18,148.59 - 0.4874 • 0.3300 • 18,259.11 50 50 92 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating•' ' i %i- ----------- ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------------------------*------- Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products •' . ' i Hearth •i 1.6500 14.1000 6.0000 0.0900 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 18,000.00 18,000.00 0.3450 0.3300 18,106.96 i i i i i i i Landscaping •i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 i 152.1542 003 i i i i i i i i i • Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 0.0000 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 50 50 92 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 34 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter 6.2 Area by SubCategory Mitigated ROG NOx CO S02 Fugitive Exhaust PM10 Fugitive Exhaust PM2.5 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e PM10 PM10 Total PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Subcategory lb/day lb/day Architectural •i 2.2670 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Coating Consumer •i 24.1085 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Products Hearth •i 1.6500 i 14.1000 6.0000 i 0.0900 1.1400 i 1.1400 1.1400 1.1400 0.0000 i 18,000.00 18,000.00 i 0.3450 1 0.3300 1 18,106.96 ---- -- - - - ------------------------------------------------------------- - - - --- - -- ------------------------------ Landscaping i 2.4766 i 0.9496 82.4430 i 4.3600e- i 0.4574 i 0.4574 i 0.4574 0.4574 i 148.5950 148.5950 i 0.1424 152.1542 003 Total 30.5020 15.0496 88.4430 0.0944 1.5974 1.5974 1.5974 18,148.59 18,148.59 0.4874 0.3300 18,259.11 j j F-777000 50 50 j 92 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Stationary Equipment CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2016.3.2 Page 35 of 35 Date: 1/12/2021 2:30 PM Village South Specific Plan (Proposed) - Los Angeles -South Coast County, Winter Fire Pumos and Emeraencv Generators IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I Boilers Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type User Defined Equipment Equipment Type Number 11.0 Vegetation Attachment C Local Hire Provision Net Change Without Local Hire Provision Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) Amortized (MT CO2e/year) 3,623 120.77 With Local Hire Provision Total Construction GHG Emissions (MT CO2e) Amortized (MT CO2e/year) % Decrease in Construction -related GHG Emissions 3,024 100.80 17% EXHIBIT B SWAP E Technical Consultation, Data Analysis and Litigation Support for the Environment Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Principal Environmental Chemist Education SOIL WATER AIR PROTECTION ENTERPRISE 2656 29th Street, Suite 201 Santa Monica, California 90405 Attn: Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Mobil: (310) 795-2335 Office: (310) 452-5555 Fax: (310) 452-5550 Email:yrosenfeld(i�swauexom Chemical Fate and Transport & Air Dispersion Modeling Risk Assessment & Remediation Specialist Ph.D. Soil Chemistry, University of Washington, 1999. Dissertation on volatile organic compound filtration. M.S. Environmental Science, U.C. Berkeley, 1995. Thesis on organic waste economics. B.A. Environmental Studies, U.C. Santa Barbara, 1991. Thesis on wastewater treatment. Professional Experience Dr. Rosenfeld has over 25 years' experience conducting environmental investigations and risk assessments for evaluating impacts to human health, property, and ecological receptors. His expertise focuses on the fate and transport of environmental contaminants, human health risk, exposure assessment, and ecological restoration. Dr. Rosenfeld has evaluated and modeled emissions from unconventional oil drilling operations, oil spills, landfills, boilers and incinerators, process stacks, storage tanks, confined animal feeding operations, and many other industrial and agricultural sources. His project experience ranges from monitoring and modeling of pollution sources to evaluating impacts of pollution on workers at industrial facilities and residents in surrounding communities. Dr. Rosenfeld has investigated and designed remediation programs and risk assessments for contaminated sites containing lead, heavy metals, mold, bacteria, particulate matter, petroleum hydrocarbons, chlorinated solvents, pesticides, radioactive waste, dioxins and furans, semi- and volatile organic compounds, PCBs, PAHs, perchlorate, asbestos, per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFOA/PFOS), unusual polymers, fuel oxygenates (MTBE), among other pollutants. Dr. Rosenfeld also has experience evaluating greenhouse gas emissions from various projects and is an expert on the assessment of odors from industrial and agricultural sites, as well as the evaluation of odor nuisance impacts and technologies for abatement of odorous emissions. As a principal scientist at SWAPE, Dr. Rosenfeld directs air dispersion modeling and exposure assessments. He has served as an expert witness and testified about pollution sources causing nuisance and/or personal injury at dozens of sites and has testified as an expert witness on more than ten cases involving exposure to air contaminants from industrial sources. Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 1 of 10 June 2019 Professional History: Soil Water Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE); 2003 to present; Principal and Founding Partner UCLA School of Public Health; 2007 to 2011; Lecturer (Assistant Researcher) UCLA School of Public Health; 2003 to 2006; Adjunct Professor UCLA Environmental Science and Engineering Program; 2002-2004; Doctoral Intern Coordinator UCLA Institute of the Environment, 2001-2002; Research Associate Komex H2O Science, 2001 to 2003; Senior Remediation Scientist National Groundwater Association, 2002-2004; Lecturer San Diego State University, 1999-2001; Adjunct Professor Anteon Corp., San Diego, 2000-2001; Remediation Project Manager Ogden (now Amec), San Diego, 2000-2000; Remediation Project Manager Bechtel, San Diego, California, 1999 — 2000; Risk Assessor King County, Seattle, 1996 — 1999; Scientist James River Corp., Washington, 1995-96; Scientist Big Creek Lumber, Davenport, California, 1995; Scientist Plumas Corp., California and USFS, Tahoe 1993-1995; Scientist Peace Corps and World Wildlife Fund, St. Kitts, West Indies, 1991-1993; Scientist Publications: Remy, L.L., Clay T., Byers, V., Rosenfeld P. E. (2019) Hospital, Health, and Community Burden After Oil Refinery Fires, Richmond, California 2007 and 2012. Environmental Health. 18:48 Simons, R.A., Seo, Y. Rosenfeld, P., (2015) Modeling the Effect of Refinery Emission On Residential Property Value. Journal of Real Estate Research. 27(3):321-342 Chen, J. A, Zapata A. R., Sutherland A. J., Molmen, D.R., Chow, B. S., Wu, L. E., Rosenfeld, P. E., Hesse, R. C., (2012) Sulfur Dioxide and Volatile Organic Compound Exposure To A Community In Texas City Texas Evaluated Using Aermod and Empirical Data. American Journal of Environmental Science, 8(6), 622-632. Rosenfeld, P.E. & Feng, L. (2011). The Risks of Hazardous Waste. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2011). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Agrochemical Industry, Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Gonzalez, J., Feng, L., Sutherland, A., Waller, C., Sok, H., Hesse, R., Rosenfeld, P. (2010). PCBs and Dioxins/Furans in Attic Dust Collected Near Former PCB Production and Secondary Copper Facilities in Sauget, IL. Procedia Environmental Sciences. 113-125. Feng, L., Wu, C., Tam, L., Sutherland, A.J., Clark, J.J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Dioxin and Furan Blood Lipid and Attic Dust Concentrations in Populations Living Near Four Wood Treatment Facilities in the United States. Journal of Environmental Health. 73(6), 34-46. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2010). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Wood and Paper Industries. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Cheremisinoff, N.P., & Rosenfeld, P.E. (2009). Handbook of Pollution Prevention and Cleaner Production: Best Practices in the Petroleum Industry. Amsterdam: Elsevier Publishing. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, Air Pollution, 123 (17), 319-327. Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 2 of 10 June 2019 Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). A Statistical Analysis Of Attic Dust And Blood Lipid Concentrations Of Tetrachloro-p-Dibenzodioxin (TCDD) Toxicity Equivalency Quotients (TEQ) In Two Populations Near Wood Treatment Facilities. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 002252-002255. Tam L. K.., Wu C. D., Clark J. J. and Rosenfeld, P.E. (2008). Methods For Collect Samples For Assessing Dioxins And Other Environmental Contaminants In Attic Dust: A Review. Organohalogen Compounds, 70, 000527- 000530. Hensley, A.R. A. Scott, J. J. J. Clark, Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Attic Dust and Human Blood Samples Collected near a Former Wood Treatment Facility. Environmental Research. 105, 194-197. Rosenfeld, P.E., J. J. J. Clark, A. R. Hensley, M. Suffet. (2007). The Use of an Odor Wheel Classification for Evaluation of Human Health Risk Criteria for Compost Facilities. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 345-357. Rosenfeld, P. E., M. Suffet. (2007). The Anatomy Of Odour Wheels For Odours Of Drinking Water, Wastewater, Compost And The Urban Environment. Water Science & Technology 55(5), 335-344. Sullivan, P. J. Clark, J.J.J., Agardy, F. J., Rosenfeld, P.E. (2007). Toxic Legacy, Synthetic Toxins in the Food, Water, and Air in American Cities. Boston Massachusetts: Elsevier Publishing Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash. Water Science and Technology. 49(9),171-178. Rosenfeld P. E., J.J. Clark, I.H. (Mel) Suffet (2004). The Value of An Odor -Quality -Wheel Classification Scheme For The Urban Environment. Water Environment Federation's Technical Exhibition and Conference (WEFTEC) 2004. New Orleans, October 2-6, 2004. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet, I.H. (2004). Understanding Odorants Associated With Compost, Biomass Facilities, and the Land Application of Biosolids. Water Science and Technology. 49(9), 193-199. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Suffet I.H. (2004). Control of Compost Odor Using High Carbon Wood Ash, Water Science and Technology, 49( 9), 171-178. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M. A., Sellew, P. (2004). Measurement of Biosolids Odor and Odorant Emissions from Windrows, Static Pile and Biofilter. Water Environment Research. 76(4), 310-315. Rosenfeld, P.E., Grey, M and Suffet, M. (2002). Compost Demonstration Project, Sacramento California Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Integrated Waste Management Board Public Affairs Office, Publications Clearinghouse (MS-6), Sacramento, CA Publication #442-02-008. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Characterization of odor emissions from three different biosolids. Water Soil and Air Pollution. 127(1-4), 173-191. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2000). Wood ash control of odor emissions from biosolids application. Journal of Environmental Quality. 29, 1662-1668. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry and D. Bennett. (2001). Wastewater dewatering polymer affect on biosolids odor emissions and microbial activity. Water Environment Research. 73(4), 363-367. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (2001). Activated Carbon and Wood Ash Sorption of Wastewater, Compost, and Biosolids Odorants. Water Environment Research, 73, 388-393. Rosenfeld, P.E., and Henry C. L., (2001). High carbon wood ash effect on biosolids microbial activity and odor. Water Environment Research. 131(1-4), 247-262. Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 3 of 10 June 2019 Chollack, T. and P. Rosenfeld. (1998). Compost Amendment Handbook For Landscaping. Prepared for and distributed by the City of Redmond, Washington State. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1992). The Mount Liamuiga Crater Trail. Heritage Magazine of St. Kitts, 3(2). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1993). High School Biogas Project to Prevent Deforestation On St. Kitts. Biomass Users Network, 7(1). Rosenfeld, P. E. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions From Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Doctoral Thesis. University of Washington College of Forest Resources. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1994). Potential Utilization of Small Diameter Trees on Sierra County Public Land. Masters thesis reprinted by the Sierra County Economic Council. Sierra County, California. Rosenfeld, P. E. (1991). How to Build a Small Rural Anaerobic Digester & Uses Of Biogas In The First And Third World. Bachelors Thesis. University of California. Presentations: Rosenfeld, P.E., Sutherland, A; Hesse, R.; Zapata, A. (October 3-6, 2013). Air dispersion modeling of volatile organic emissions from multiple natural gas wells in Decatur, TX. 44th Western Regional Meeting, American Chemical Society. Lecture conducted from Santa Clara, CA. Sok, H.L.; Waller, C.C.; Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sutherland, A.J.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Atrazine: A Persistent Pesticide in Urban Drinking Water. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA. Feng, L.; Gonzalez, J.; Sok, H.L.; Sutherland, A.J.; Waller, C.C.; Wisdom -Stack, T.; Sahai, R.K.; La, M.; Hesse, R.C.; Rosenfeld, P.E. (June 20-23, 2010). Bringing Environmental Justice to East St. Louis, Illinois. Urban Environmental Pollution. Lecture conducted from Boston, MA. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Perfluoroctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluoroactane Sulfonate (PFOS) Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting, Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ. Rosenfeld, P.E. (April 19-23, 2009). Cost to Filter Atrazine Contamination from Drinking Water in the United States" Contamination in Drinking Water From the Use of Aqueous Film Forming Foams (AFFF) at Airports in the United States. 2009 Ground Water Summit and 2009 Ground Water Protection Council Spring Meeting. Lecture conducted from Tuscon, AZ. Wu, C., Tam, L., Clark, J., Rosenfeld, P. (20-22 July, 2009). Dioxin and furan blood lipid concentrations in populations living near four wood treatment facilities in the United States. Brebbia, C.A. and Popov, V., eds., Air Pollution XVII: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Modeling, Monitoring and Management of Air Pollution. Lecture conducted from Tallinn, Estonia. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Moss Point Community Exposure To Contaminants From A Releasing Facility. The 231 Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). The Repeated Trespass of Tritium -Contaminated Water Into A Surrounding Community Form Repeated Waste Spills From A Nuclear Power Plant. The 23' Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Platform lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 4 of 10 June 2019 Rosenfeld, P. E. (October 15-18, 2007). Somerville Community Exposure To Contaminants From Wood Treatment Facility Emissions. The 231 Annual International Conferences on Soils Sediment and Water. Lecture conducted from University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Production, Chemical Properties, Toxicology, & Treatment Case Studies of 1,2,3- Trichloropropane (TCP). The Association for Environmental Health and Sciences (AEHS) Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA. Rosenfeld P. E. (March 2007). Blood and Attic Sampling for Dioxin/Furan, PAH, and Metal Exposure in Florala, Alabama. The AEHS Annual Meeting. Lecture conducted from San Diego, CA. Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (August 21 — 25, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. The 26th International Symposium on Halogenated Persistent Organic Pollutants — DIOWN2006. Lecture conducted from Radisson SAS Scandinavia Hotel in Oslo Norway. Hensley A.R., Scott, A., Rosenfeld P.E., Clark, J.J.J. (November 4-8, 2006). Dioxin Containing Attic Dust And Human Blood Samples Collected Near A Former Wood Treatment Facility. APHA 134 Annual Meeting & Exposition. Lecture conducted from Boston Massachusetts. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (October 24-25, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. Mealey's C8/PFOA. Science, Risk & Litigation Conference. Lecture conducted from The Rittenhouse Hotel, Philadelphia, PA. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel, Irvine California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 19, 2005). Fate, Transport, Toxicity, And Persistence of 1,2,3-TCP. PEMA Emerging Contaminant Conference. Lecture conducted from Hilton Hotel in Irvine, California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (September 26-27, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PDBEs. Mealey's Groundwater Conference. Lecture conducted from Ritz Carlton Hotel, Marina Del Ray, California. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (June 7-8, 2005). Fate, Transport and Persistence of PFOA and Related Chemicals. International Society of Environmental Forensics: Focus On Emerging Contaminants. Lecture conducted from Sheraton Oceanfront Hotel, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Fate Transport, Persistence and Toxicology of PFOA and Related Perfluorochemicals. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water And Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld Ph.D. (July 21-22, 2005). Brominated Flame Retardants in Groundwater: Pathways to Human Ingestion, Toxicology and Remediation. 2005 National Groundwater Association Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Wyndham Baltimore Inner Harbor, Baltimore Maryland. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. and Rob Hesse R.G. (May 5-6, 2004). Tert-butyl Alcohol Liability and Toxicology, A National Problem and Unquantified Liability. National Groundwater Association. Environmental Law Conference. Lecture conducted from Congress Plaza Hotel, Chicago Illinois. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (March 2004). Perchlorate Toxicology. Meeting of the American Groundwater Trust. Lecture conducted from Phoenix Arizona. Hagemann, M.F., Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and Rob Hesse (2004). Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Meeting of tribal representatives. Lecture conducted from Parker, AZ. Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 5 of 10 June 2019 Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (April 7, 2004). A National Damage Assessment Model For PCE and Dry Cleaners. Drycleaner Symposium. California Ground Water Association. Lecture conducted from Radison Hotel, Sacramento, California. Rosenfeld, P. E., Grey, M., (June 2003) Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Seventh International In Situ And On Site Bioremediation Symposium Battelle Conference Orlando, FL. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. and James Clark Ph.D. (February 20-21, 2003) Understanding Historical Use, Chemical Properties, Toxicity and Regulatory Guidance of 1,4 Dioxane. National Groundwater Association. Southwest Focus Conference. Water Supply and Emerging Contaminants.. Lecture conducted from Hyatt Regency Phoenix Arizona. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (February 6-7, 2003). Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. California CUPA Forum. Lecture conducted from Marriott Hotel, Anaheim California. Paul Rosenfeld, Ph.D. (October 23, 2002) Underground Storage Tank Litigation and Remediation. EPA Underground Storage Tank Roundtable. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Understanding Odor from Compost, Wastewater and Industrial Processes. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Suffet, M. (October 7- 10, 2002). Using High Carbon Wood Ash to Control Compost Odor. Sixth Annual Symposium On Off Flavors in the Aquatic Environment. International Water Association. Lecture conducted from Barcelona Spain. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (September 22-24, 2002). Biocycle Composting For Coastal Sage Restoration. Northwest Biosolids Management Association. Lecture conducted from Vancouver Washington.. Rosenfeld, P.E. and Grey, M. A. (November 11-14, 2002). Using High -Carbon Wood Ash to Control Odor at a Green Materials Composting Facility. Soil Science Society Annual Conference. Lecture conducted from Indianapolis, Maryland. Rosenfeld. P.E. (September 16, 2000). Two stage biofilter for biosolids composting odor control. Water Environment Federation. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. Rosenfeld. P.E. (October 16, 2000). Wood ash and biofilter control of compost odor. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Ocean Shores, California. Rosenfeld, P.E. (2000). Bioremediation Using Organic Soil Amendments. California Resource Recovery Association. Lecture conducted from Sacramento California. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., and C.L. Henry. (1999). An evaluation of ash incorporation with biosolids for odor reduction. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Salt Lake City Utah. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Comparison of Microbial Activity and Odor Emissions from Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Brown and Caldwell. Lecture conducted from Seattle Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry. (1998). Characterization, Quantification, and Control of Odor Emissions from Biosolids Application To Forest Soil. Biofest. Lecture conducted from Lake Chelan, Washington. Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 6 of 10 June 2019 Rosenfeld, P.E, C.L. Henry, R. Harrison. (1998). Oat and Grass Seed Germination and Nitrogen and Sulfur Emissions Following Biosolids Incorporation With High -Carbon Wood -Ash. Water Environment Federation 12th Annual Residuals and Biosolids Management Conference Proceedings. Lecture conducted from Bellevue Washington. Rosenfeld, P.E., C.L. Henry, R. B. Harrison, and R. Dills. (1997). Comparison of Odor Emissions From Three Different Biosolids Applied to Forest Soil. Soil Science Society of America. Lecture conducted from Anaheim California. Teaching Experience: UCLA Department of Environmental Health (Summer 2003 through 20010) Taught Environmental Health Science 100 to students, including undergrad, medical doctors, public health professionals and nurses. Course focused on the health effects of environmental contaminants. National Ground Water Association, Successful Remediation Technologies. Custom Course in Sante Fe, New Mexico. May 21, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of fuel contaminants associated with underground storage tanks. National Ground Water Association; Successful Remediation Technologies Course in Chicago Illinois. April 1, 2002. Focused on fate and transport of contaminants associated with Superfund and RCRA sites. California Integrated Waste Management Board, April and May, 2001. Alternative Landfill Caps Seminar in San Diego, Ventura, and San Francisco. Focused on both prescriptive and innovative landfill cover design. UCLA Department of Environmental Engineering, February 5, 2002. Seminar on Successful Remediation Technologies focusing on Groundwater Remediation. University Of Washington, Soil Science Program, Teaching Assistant for several courses including: Soil Chemistry, Organic Soil Amendments, and Soil Stability. U.C. Berkeley, Environmental Science Program Teaching Assistant for Environmental Science 10. Academic Grants Awarded: California Integrated Waste Management Board. $41,000 grant awarded to UCLA Institute of the Environment. Goal: To investigate effect of high carbon wood ash on volatile organic emissions from compost. 2001. Synagro Technologies, Corona California: $10,000 grant awarded to San Diego State University. Goal: investigate effect of biosolids for restoration and remediation of degraded coastal sage soils. 2000. King County, Department of Research and Technology, Washington State. $100,000 grant awarded to University of Washington: Goal: To investigate odor emissions from biosolids application and the effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions. 1998. Northwest Biosolids Management Association, Washington State. $20,000 grant awarded to investigate effect of polymers and ash on VOC emissions from biosolids. 1997. James River Corporation, Oregon: $10,000 grant was awarded to investigate the success of genetically engineered Poplar trees with resistance to round -up. 1996. United State Forest Service, Tahoe National Forest: $15,000 grant was awarded to investigating fire ecology of the Tahoe National Forest. 1995. Kellogg Foundation, Washington D.C. $500 grant was awarded to construct a large anaerobic digester on St. Kitts in West Indies. 1993 Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 7 of 10 June 2019 Deposition and/or Trial Testimony: In the United States District Court For The District of New Jersey Duarte et al, Plaintiffs, vs. United States Metals Refining Company et. al. Defendant. Case No.: 2:17-cv-01624-ES-SCM Rosenfeld Deposition. 6-7-2019 In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division M/T Carla Maersk, Plaintiffs, vs. Conti 168., Schiffahrts-GMBH & Co. Bulker KG MS "Conti Perdido' Defendant. Case No.: 3:15-CV-00106 consolidated with 3:15-CV-00237 Rosenfeld Deposition. 5-9-2019 In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles — Santa Monica Carole-Taddeo-Bates et al., vs. Ifran Khan et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC615636 Rosenfeld Deposition, 1-26-2019 In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Los Angeles — Santa Monica The San Gabriel Valley Council of Governments et al. vs El Adobe Apts. Inc. et al., Defendants Case No.: No. BC646857 Rosenfeld Deposition, 10-6-2018; Trial 3-7-19 In United States District Court For The District of Colorado Bells et al. Plaintiff vs. The 3M Company et al., Defendants Case: No 1:16-cv-02531-RBJ Rosenfeld Deposition, 3-15-2018 and 4-3-2018 In The District Court Of Regan County, Texas, 112' Judicial District Phillip Bales et al., Plaintiff vs. Dow Agrosciences, LLC, et al., Defendants Cause No 1923 Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-17-2017 In The Superior Court of the State of California In And For The County Of Contra Costa Simons et al., Plaintiffs vs. Chevron Corporation, et al., Defendants Cause No C12-01481 Rosenfeld Deposition, 11-20-2017 In The Circuit Court Of The Twentieth Judicial Circuit, St Clair County, Illinois Martha Custer et al., Plaintiff vs. Cerro Flow Products, Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. Oi9-L-2295 Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-23-2017 In The Superior Court of the State of California, For The County of Los Angeles Warm Gilbert and Penny Gilber, Plaintiff vs. BMW of North America LLC Case No.: LC102019 (c/w BC582154) Rosenfeld Deposition, 8-16-2017, Trail 8-28-2018 In the Northern District Court of Mississippi, Greenville Division Brenda J. Cooper, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Meritor Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 4:16-cv-52-DMB-JVM Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2017 Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 8 of 10 June 2019 In The Superior Court of the State of Washington, County of Snohomish Michael Davis and Julie Davis et al., Plaintiff vs. Cedar Grove Composting Inc., Defendants Case No.: No. 13-2-03987-5 Rosenfeld Deposition, February 2017 Trial, March 2017 In The Superior Court of the State of California, County of Alameda Charles Spain., Plaintiff vs. Thermo Fisher Scientific, et al., Defendants Case No.: RG14711115 Rosenfeld Deposition, September 2015 In The Iowa District Court In And For Poweshiek County Russell D. Winburn, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Doug Hoksbergen, et al., Defendants Case No.: LALA002187 Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Jerry Dovico, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Valley View Sine LLC, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Wapello County Doug Pauls, et al.,, et al., Plaintiffs vs. Richard Warren, et al., Defendants Law No,: LALA105144 - Division A Rosenfeld Deposition, August 2015 In The Circuit Court of Ohio County, West Virginia Robert Andrews, et al. v. Antero, et al. Civil Action NO. 14-C-30000 Rosenfeld Deposition, June 2015 In The Third Judicial District County of Dona Ana, New Mexico Betty Gonzalez, et al. Plaintiffs vs. Del Oro Dairy, Del Oro Real Estate LLC, Jerry Settles and Deward DeRuyter, Defendants Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2015 In The Iowa District Court For Muscatine County Laurie Freeman et. al. Plaintiffs vs. Grain Processing Corporation, Defendant Case No 4980 Rosenfeld Deposition: May 2015 In the Circuit Court of the 17' Judicial Circuit, in and For Broward County, Florida Walter Hinton, et. al. Plaintiff, vs. City of Fort Lauderdale, Florida, a Municipality, Defendant. Case Number CACE07030358 (26) Rosenfeld Deposition: December 2014 In the United States District Court Western District of Oklahoma Tommy McCarty, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Oklahoma City Landfill, LLC d/b/a Southeast Oklahoma City Landfill, et al. Defendants. Case No. 5:12-cv-01152-C Rosenfeld Deposition: July 2014 Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 9 of 10 June 2019 In the County Court of Dallas County Texas Lisa Parr et al, Plaintiff, vs. Aruba et al, Defendant. Case Number cc-11-01650-E Rosenfeld Deposition: March and September 2013 Rosenfeld Trial: April 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Tuscarawas County Ohio John Michael Abicht, et al., Plaintiffs, vs. Republic Services, Inc., et al., Defendants Case Number: 2008 CT 10 0741 (Cons. w/ 2009 CV 10 0987) Rosenfeld Deposition: October 2012 In the United States District Court of Southern District of Texas Galveston Division Kyle Cannon, Eugene Donovan, Genaro Ramirez, Carol Sassler, and Harvey Walton, each Individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. BP Products North America, Inc., Defendant. Case 3: 1 0-cv-00622 Rosenfeld Deposition: February 2012 Rosenfeld Trial: April 2013 In the Circuit Court of Baltimore County Maryland Philip E. Cvach, II et al., Plaintiffs vs. Two Farms, Inc. d/b/a Royal Farms, Defendants Case Number: 03-C-12-012487 OT Rosenfeld Deposition: September 2013 Paul E. Rosenfeld, Ph.D. Page 10 of 10 June 2019 EXHIBIT C IS p C Technical Cvnsuftatian. Data Analysis and G Ui Uation811ppartforthe Enxirumsent Matthew F. Hagemann, P.G., C.Hg., QSD, QSP 1640 5th St.., Suite 204 Santa Santa Monica, California 90401 Tel: (949) 887-9013 Email: mhagemann@swape.com Geologic and Hydrogeologic Characterization Industrial Stormwater Compliance Investigation and Remediation Strategies Litigation Support and Testifying Expert CEQA Review Education: M.S. Degree, Geology, California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 1984. B.A. Degree, Geology, Humboldt State University, Arcata, CA, 1982. Professional Certifications: California Professional Geologist California Certified Hydrogeologist Qualified SWPPP Developer and Practitioner Professional Experience: Matt has 25 years of experience in environmental policy, assessment and remediation. He spent nine years with the U.S. EPA in the RCRA and Superfund programs and served as EPA's Senior Science Policy Advisor in the Western Regional Office where he identified emerging threats to groundwater from perchlorate and MTBE. While with EPA, Matt also served as a Senior Hydrogeologist in the oversight of the assessment of seven major military facilities undergoing base closure. He led numerous enforcement actions under provisions of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) while also working with permit holders to improve hydrogeologic characterization and water quality monitoring. Matt has worked closely with U.S. EPA legal counsel and the technical staff of several states in the application and enforcement of RCRA, Safe Drinking Water Act and Clean Water Act regulations. Matt has trained the technical staff in the States of California, Hawaii, Nevada, Arizona and the Territory of Guam in the conduct of investigations, groundwater fundamentals, and sampling techniques. Positions Matt has held include: • Founding Partner, Soil/Water/Air Protection Enterprise (SWAPE) (2003 — present); • Geology Instructor, Golden West College, 2010 — 2014; • Senior Environmental Analyst, Komex H2O Science, Inc. (2000 -- 2003); • Executive Director, Orange Coast Watch (2001- 2004); • Senior Science Policy Advisor and Hydrogeologist, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1989- 1998); • Hydrogeologist, National Park Service, Water Resources Division (1998 - 2000); • Adjunct Faculty Member, San Francisco State University, Department of Geosciences (1993 - 1998); • Instructor, College of Marin, Department of Science (1990-1995); • Geologist, U.S. Forest Service (1986-1998); and • Geologist, Dames & Moore (1984-1986). Senior Regulatory and Litigation Support Analyst: With SWAPE, Matt's responsibilities have included: • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of over 100 environmental impact reports since 2003 under CEQA that identify significant issues with regard to hazardous waste, water resources, water quality, air quality, Valley Fever, greenhouse gas emissions, and geologic hazards. Make recommendations for additional mitigation measures to lead agencies at the local and county level to include additional characterization of health risks and implementation of protective measures to reduce worker exposure to hazards from toxins and Valley Fever. • Stormwater analysis, sampling and best management practice evaluation at industrial facilities. • Manager of a project to provide technical assistance to a community adjacent to a former Naval shipyard under a grant from the U.S. EPA. • Technical assistance and litigation support for vapor intrusion concerns. • Lead analyst and testifying expert in the review of environmental issues in license applications for large solar power plants before the California Energy Commission. • Manager of a project to evaluate numerous formerly used military sites in the western U.S. • Manager of a comprehensive evaluation of potential sources of perchlorate contamination in Southern California drinking water wells. • Manager and designated expert for litigation support under provisions of Proposition 65 in the review of releases of gasoline to sources drinking water at major refineries and hundreds of gas stations throughout California. • Expert witness on two cases involving MTBE litigation. • Expert witness and litigation support on the impact of air toxins and hazards at a school. • Expert witness in litigation at a former plywood plant. With Komex H2O Science Inc., Matt's duties included the following: • Senior author of a report on the extent of perchlorate contamination that was used in testimony by the former U.S. EPA Administrator and General Counsel. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of MTBE use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in the development of a comprehensive, electronically interactive chronology of perchlorate use, research, and regulation. • Senior researcher in a study that estimates nationwide costs for MTBE remediation and drinking water treatment, results of which were published in newspapers nationwide and in testimony against provisions of an energy bill that would limit liability for oil companies. • Research to support litigation to restore drinking water supplies that have been contaminated by MTBE in California and New York. 2 Expert witness testimony in a case of oil production -related contamination in Mississippi. Lead author for a multi -volume remedial investigation report for an operating school in Los Angeles that met strict regulatory requirements and rigorous deadlines. • Development of strategic approaches for cleanup of contaminated sites in consultation with clients and regulators. Executive Director: As Executive Director with Orange Coast Watch, Matt led efforts to restore water quality at Orange County beaches from multiple sources of contamination including urban runoff and the discharge of wastewater. In reporting to a Board of Directors that included representatives from leading Orange County universities and businesses, Matt prepared issue papers in the areas of treatment and disinfection of wastewater and control of the discharge of grease to sewer systems. Matt actively participated in the development of countywide water quality permits for the control of urban runoff and permits for the discharge of wastewater. Matt worked with other nonprofits to protect and restore water quality, including Surfrider, Natural Resources Defense Council and Orange County CoastKeeper as well as with business institutions including the Orange County Business Council. Hydrogeology: As a Senior Hydrogeologist with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Matt led investigations to characterize and cleanup closing military bases, including Mare Island Naval Shipyard, Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, Treasure Island Naval Station, Alameda Naval Station, Moffett Field, Mather Army Airfield, and Sacramento Army Depot. Specific activities were as follows: • Led efforts to model groundwater flow and contaminant transport, ensured adequacy of monitoring networks, and assessed cleanup alternatives for contaminated sediment, soil, and groundwater. • Initiated a regional program for evaluation of groundwater sampling practices and laboratory analysis at military bases. • Identified emerging issues, wrote technical guidance, and assisted in policy and regulation development through work on four national U.S. EPA workgroups, including the Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum and the Federal Facilities Forum. At the request of the State of Hawaii, Matt developed a methodology to determine the vulnerability of groundwater to contamination on the islands of Maui and Oahu. He used analytical models and a GIS to show zones of vulnerability, and the results were adopted and published by the State of Hawaii and County of Maui. As a hydrogeologist with the EPA Groundwater Protection Section, Matt worked with provisions of the Safe Drinking Water Act and NEPA to prevent drinking water contamination. Specific activities included the following: • Received an EPA Bronze Medal for his contribution to the development of national guidance for the protection of drinking water. • Managed the Sole Source Aquifer Program and protected the drinking water of two communities through designation under the Safe Drinking Water Act. He prepared geologic reports, conducted public hearings, and responded to public comments from residents who were very concerned about the impact of designation. 4 Reviewed a number of Environmental Impact Statements for planned major developments, including large hazardous and solid waste disposal facilities, mine reclamation, and water transfer. Matt served as a hydrogeologist with the RCRA Hazardous Waste program. Duties were as follows: • Supervised the hydrogeologic investigation of hazardous waste sites to determine compliance with Subtitle C requirements. • Reviewed and wrote "part B" permits for the disposal of hazardous waste. • Conducted RCRA Corrective Action investigations of waste sites and led inspections that formed the basis for significant enforcement actions that were developed in close coordination with U.S. EPA legal counsel. • Wrote contract specifications and supervised contractor's investigations of waste sites. With the National Park Service, Matt directed service -wide investigations of contaminant sources to prevent degradation of water quality, including the following tasks: • Applied pertinent laws and regulations including CERCLA, RCRA, NEPA, NRDA, and the Clean Water Act to control military, mining, and landfill contaminants. • Conducted watershed -scale investigations of contaminants at parks, including Yellowstone and Olympic National Park. • Identified high -levels of perchlorate in soil adjacent to a national park in New Mexico and advised park superintendent on appropriate response actions under CERCLA. • Served as a Park Service representative on the Interagency Perchlorate Steering Committee, a national workgroup. • Developed a program to conduct environmental compliance audits of all National Parks while serving on a national workgroup. • Co-authored two papers on the potential for water contamination from the operation of personal watercraft and snowmobiles, these papers serving as the basis for the development of nation- wide policy on the use of these vehicles in National Parks. • Contributed to the Federal Multi -Agency Source Water Agreement under the Clean Water Action Plan. Policy: Served senior management as the Senior Science Policy Advisor with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9. Activities included the following: • Advised the Regional Administrator and senior management on emerging issues such as the potential for the gasoline additive MTBE and ammonium perchlorate to contaminate drinking water supplies. • Shaped EPA's national response to these threats by serving on workgroups and by contributing to guidance, including the Office of Research and Development publication, Oxygenates in Water: Critical Information and Research Needs. • Improved the technical training of EPA's scientific and engineering staff. • Earned an EPA Bronze Medal for representing the region's 300 scientists and engineers in negotiations with the Administrator and senior management to better integrate scientific principles into the policy -making process. • Established national protocol for the peer review of scientific documents. 5 Geology With the U.S. Forest Service, Matt led investigations to determine hillslope stability of areas proposed for timber harvest in the central Oregon Coast Range. Specific activities were as follows: • Mapped geology in the field, and used aerial photographic interpretation and mathematical models to determine slope stability. • Coordinated his research with community members who were concerned with natural resource protection. • Characterized the geology of an aquifer that serves as the sole source of drinking water for the city of Medford, Oregon. As a consultant with Dames and Moore, Matt led geologic investigations of two contaminated sites (later listed on the Superfund NPL) in the Portland, Oregon, area and a large hazardous waste site in eastern Oregon. Duties included the following: Supervised year -long effort for soil and groundwater sampling. Conducted aquifer tests. Investigated active faults beneath sites proposed for hazardous waste disposal. Teaching: From 1990 to 1998, Matt taught at least one course per semester at the community college and university levels: At San Francisco State University, held an adjunct faculty position and taught courses in environmental geology, oceanography (lab and lecture), hydrogeology, and groundwater contamination. Served as a committee member for graduate and undergraduate students. Taught courses in environmental geology and oceanography at the College of Marin. Matt taught physical geology (lecture and lab and introductory geology at Golden West College in Huntington Beach, California from 2010 to 2014. Invited Testimony, Reports, Papers and Presentations: Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Presentation to the Public Environmental Law Conference, Eugene, Oregon. Hagemann, M.F., 2008. Disclosure of Hazardous Waste Issues under CEQA. Invited presentation to U.S. EPA Region 9, San Francisco, California. Hagemann, M.F., 2005. Use of Electronic Databases in Environmental Regulation, Policy Making and Public Participation. Brownfields 2005, Denver, Coloradao. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Nevada and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Las Vegas, NV (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Invited testimony to a California Senate committee hearing on air toxins at schools in Southern California, Los Angeles. Brown, A., Farrow, J., Gray, A. and Hagemann, M., 2004. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to the Ground Water and Environmental Law Conference, National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2004. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in Arizona and the Southwestern U.S. Presentation to a meeting of the American Groundwater Trust, Phoenix, AZ (served on conference organizing committee). Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River and Impacts to Drinking Water in the Southwestern U.S. Invited presentation to a special committee meeting of the National Academy of Sciences, Irvine, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a tribal EPA meeting, Pechanga, CA. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate Contamination of the Colorado River. Invited presentation to a meeting of tribal repesentatives, Parker, AZ. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Impact of Perchlorate on the Colorado River and Associated Drinking Water Supplies. Invited presentation to the Inter -Tribal Meeting, Torres Martinez Tribe. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. The Emergence of Perchlorate as a Widespread Drinking Water Contaminant. Invited presentation to the U.S. EPA Region 9. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. A Deductive Approach to the Assessment of Perchlorate Contamination. Invited presentation to the California Assembly Natural Resources Committee. Hagemann, M.F., 2003. Perchlorate: A Cold War Legacy in Drinking Water. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater and an Estimate of Costs to Address Impacts to Groundwater. Presentation to the annual meeting of the Society of Environmental Journalists. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of the Cost to Address MTBE Contamination in Groundwater (and Who Will Pay). Presentation to a meeting of the National Groundwater Association. Hagemann, M.F., 2002. An Estimate of Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Underground Storage Tanks and the Resulting Impact to Drinking Water Wells. Presentation to a meeting of the U.S. EPA and State Underground Storage Tank Program managers. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. From Tank to Tap: A Chronology of MTBE in Groundwater. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Cleanup Cost for MTBE in Groundwater Used as Drinking Water. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., 2001. Estimated Costs to Address MTBE Releases from Leaking Underground Storage Tanks. Unpublished report. Hagemann, M.F., and VanMouwerik, M., 1999. Potential W a t e r Quality Concerns Related to Snowmobile Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. VanMouwerik, M. and Hagemann, M.F. 1999, Water Quality Concerns Related to Personal Watercraft Usage. Water Resources Division, National Park Service, Technical Report. Hagemann, M.F., 1999, Is Dilution the Solution to Pollution in National Parks? The George Wright Society Biannual Meeting, Asheville, North Carolina. Hagemann, M.F., 1997, The Potential for MTBE to Contaminate Groundwater. U.S. EPA Superfund Groundwater Technical Forum Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, Nevada. Hagemann, M.F., and Gill, M., 1996, Impediments to Intrinsic Remediation, Moffett Field Naval Air Station, Conference on Intrinsic Remediation of Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, Salt Lake City. Hagemann, M.F., Fukunaga, G.L., 1996, The Vulnerability of Groundwater to Anthropogenic Contaminants on the Island of Maui, Hawaii. Hawaii Water Works Association Annual Meeting, Maui, October 1996. Hagemann, M. F., Fukanaga, G. L., 1996, Ranking Groundwater Vulnerability in Central Oahu, Hawaii. Proceedings, Geographic Information Systems in Environmental Resources Management, Air and Waste Management Association Publication VIP-61. Hagemann, M.F., 1994. Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup at Closing Military Bases in California. Proceedings, California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. Hagemann, M.F. and Sabol, M.A., 1993. Role of the U.S. EPA in the High Plains States Groundwater Recharge Demonstration Program. Proceedings, Sixth Biennial Symposium on the Artificial Recharge of Groundwater. Hagemann, M.F., 1993. U.S. EPA Policy on the Technical Impracticability of the Cleanup of DNAPL- contaminated Groundwater. California Groundwater Resources Association Meeting. 0 Hagemann, M.F., 1992. Dense Nonaqueous Phase Liquid Contamination of Groundwater: An Ounce of Prevention... Proceedings, Association of Engineering Geologists Annual Meeting, v. 35. Other Experience: Selected as subject matter expert for the California Professional Geologist licensing examination, 2009- 2011. E EXHIBIT D ODl PO 1AL_ MMI) PY otgCOM Ot Qftwfts Of Los Afww+as AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES APR U 5 2021 Case Number, 19STCP05445 soRca*,Emwaa wamotou Hearing Date: March 3, 2021 ORDER GRANTING PEWION FOR WRIT OF MANDATE AND COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF Through its Verified Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Injunctive Relief (the petition) Petitioner, AIDS Healthcare Foundation, challenges the certification of an environmental impact report (EIR) by Respondent, the City of Los Angeles. Petitioner seeks an order requiring the City to "vacate and withdraw the certification of the EIR and all Project Entitlements ...." (Pet., Prayer 11 A.) Petitioner contends it is entitled to relief because the City violated the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq. ). Both the City and Real Party in Interest, Southern California Flower Growers, Inc. (Flower Growers) oppose the petition. The petition is granted. STATEMENT OF THE CASE' The Project: The project is a mixed -use development located on just under four acres in the downtown area of the City.x The site is currently the Southern California Flower Market, a wholesale market owned and occupied by the Flower Growers. (AR 778, 810, 866-67.) The project site contains two buildings; the South Building, which was built in 1962 or 1963, and the North Building, which was built as part of the flower market's expansion in 1981. (AR 778, 866-868.) The buildings are two stories with a parking deck above. (AR 868.) The project renovates and upgrades the North building, which will continue to operate as a flower market. The project will demolish the South Building and replace it with a new twelve story, mixed -use development comprised of 323 residential units and 1.67,248 square feet of non-residential uses —retail, office, restaurant, wholesale storage and event space (the Project). (AR 719, 4462-4463.) I AR refers to the administrative record. 'The site is bounded by 7th Street, 8th Street, Maple Avenue, and Wall Street. (AR 748, 791.) Page 1 of 21 The City's Approval of the Project. On May 22, 2017, the City issue a notice of preparation for the Project. On September 20, 2018, the City released a 604-page Draft EIR (DEIR) for the Project. (AR 4086-4087,1321.) The City issued the Final EIR3 on April 12, 2019. (AR 4087.) The City conducted a public hearing on the EIR in May 2019. (AR 5-156, 4410-11.) Thereafter, on June 3, 2019, the City's Advisory Agency, certified the EIR, adopted the CEQA findings and a mitigation, monitoring and reporting program (MMRP), and approved the Projec a (AR 5-156, 4410-11.) Two entities appealed the Advisory Agency's decision on June 13, 2019.5 (AR 6715, 6869.) The appeals raised concerns about the Project's construction noise and air quality impacts. (AR 3574-77, 6869-80.) The City Planning Commission (CPQ heard and denied the appeals on August 26, 2019. The CPC certified the EIR and affirmed the Advisory Agency's Project approval. (AR 157-312, 4412-4420, 4425-4427, 4429-4531. ) On September 5, 2019, Petitioner appealed the CPC's decision. (AR 8457-8464.) On October 29, 2019, after holding another public hearing, the City's Planning and Land Use Management Committee voted unanimously to recommend that the full City Council deny the appeals and approve the Project. (AR 440-445, 4543-4547, 4548- 4602.) At a public meeting on November 12, 2019, the City Council voted unanimously to deny the appeals and approve the Project. (AR 709-710, 4603-4623.) The writ petition ensued. STANDARD OF REVIEW In reviewing an agency's compliance with CEQA during the course of its legislative or quasi - legislative actions, the trial court's inquiry during a mandamus proceeding"shall extend only to whether there was a prejudicial abuse of discretion,' " which is established "'if the agency has not proceeded in a manner required by law or if the determination or decision is not supported by substantial evidence.'" (Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova (2007) 40 CalAth 412,426 [citing Pub. Resources Code § 21168.51.) "in evaluating an EIR for CEQA compliance, ... a reviewing court must adjust its scrutiny to the nature of the alleged defect, depending on whether the claim is predominantly one of improper procedure or a dispute over the facts." (Id. at 435.) 3The court refers to the Final EIR herein as the EIR. The court designates any specific references to the Draft EIR as DEIR herein. The Advisory Agency also approved the tract map on June 3, 2019. (AR 4299.) The City issued three errata to the EIR during the administrative review process: Erratum No. 1 on July 26, 2019; Erratum No. 2 on August 7, 2019; and Erratum No. 3 on October 18, 2019. (AR 4326.) 'American Florists Exchange, Ltd. and the Coalition for Responsible Equitable Economic Development appealed the Advisory Agency's decision. Page 2 of 21 CEQA requires an EIR to "be prepared with a sufficient degree of analysis to provide decision makers with information which enables them to make a decision which intelligently takes account of environmental consequences." (Guideliness § 15151; Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (Friant Ranch) (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, 516.) "An EIR's designation of a particular environmental effect as "significant' does not excuse the EIR's failure to reasonably describe the nature and magnitude of the adverse effect." Qd at 514.) '[T]here must be a disclosure of the 'analytic route the.. - agency traveled from evidence to action: " (Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of the University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376, 404.) "[A) conclusory discussion of an environmental impact that an EIR deems significant can be determined by a court to be Inadequate as an informational document without reference to substantial evidence." (Friant Ranch, supra. 6 Cal.5th at 514.) If the deficiencies in an EIR preclude "informed decisionmaking and public participation, the goals of CEQA are thwarted and a prejudicial abuse of discretion has occurred." (Save Our Peninsula Committee v. Monterey County Bd. of Supervisors (2001) 87 Cal.App.4th 99,128.) "Where the alleged defect is that the agency has failed to proceed in the manner required by law, the court determines de nova whether the agency has employed the correct procedures, scrupulously enforcing all legislatively mandated requirements." (Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. City of Chico (2019) 40 Cal.App.5th 839, 845.) With respect to "ail substantial evidence challenges, an appellant challenging an EIR for insufficient evidence must lay out the evidence favorable to the other side and show why it is lacking. Failure to do so is fatal. A reviewing court will not independently review the record to make up for appellant's failure to carry his burden." (Defend the Bay v, City of Irvine (2004)119 Cal.App.4th 1261,1266.) Moreover, "the reviewing court'may not set aside an agency's approval of an EIR on the ground that an opposite conclusion would have been equally or more reasonable,' for, on factual questions, our task 'is not to weigh conflicting evidence and determine who has the better argument.' " (Vineyard Area Citizens for Responsible Growth Inc. v. City of Rancho Cordova, supra, 40 Cal.4th at 435.) "Regardless of what is alleged, an EIR approved by a governmental agency is presumed legally adequate, and the party challenging the EIR has the burden of showing otherwise." (Chico Advocates for a Responsible Economy v. City of Chico, supra, 40 Cal.App.5th at 846.) 6 The CEQA Guidelines are found at Title 14 Cal. Code Regs §§ 15000 et seq. Page 3 of 21 ANALYSIS Petitioner contends the EIR analysis of the Project's environmental impacts is flawed as to greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, air quality and noise. The court addresses the claims in turn. GHG Impacts: Petitioner claims the City's analysis under the "first significance threshold" 7 does not comply with CECIA. Petitioner's arguments arise in three general categories that are all related in some way to the Clty's selection of a significance threshold for GHG impacts. First, Petitioner contends the EIR's GHG analysis is inaccurate, confusing and misleading. Second, Petitioner asserts the City selected an inappropriate significance threshold. Third, Petitioner argues the EIR fails as an informal document for decisionmakers and informed public participation because It omits any analysis of Senate Bill (SB) 32 codified at Health and Safety Code section 38566. Guidelines section 15064.4, subdivision (a) provides: "A lead agency shall have discretion to determine, in the context of a particular project, whether to: (1) Quantify greenhouse gas emissions resulting from a project; and/or (21 Rely on a qualitative analysis or performance based standards." Thus, under the Guidelines, the City had the option of selecting a quantitative or qualitative significance threshold for GHG emissions "based to the extent possible on scientific and factual data." (Guidelines § 15064, subd. (b).) Further, "California's CEQA Guidelines ... recognize that an agency's adoption of a threshold of significance requires an exercise of reasoned judgment." (Mission Bay Alliance v. Office of Community Investment & Infrastructure (2016) 6 Cal.App.5th 160, 206.) A city's choice of a significance threshold "will be upheld if founded on substantial evidence." (ibid.) First, Petitioner argues the City's "discussion of the GHG signifJconce thresholds violates CEQA" because "it is inaccurate and confusing." (Reply 5:33 [emphasis added].) The court disagrees. A reasonable reading of the EIR and the City's selection of a significance threshold does not support Petitioner's claim. The City explained because the California Air Resources Board (CARE), the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the City "have yet to adopt project -level significance thresholds for GHG emissions that would be applicable to the Project," the City obtained its primary direction for GHG emissions analysis from the Guidelines. (AR 917.) The City reported a project could have a significant environmental impact if the project generated GHG emissions that may have a significant impact on the environment, or if the project would conflict with "an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions" of GHG. (AR 14:917.) After a straight -forward plain language discussion in plain in 7 Petitioner contends the City has relied upon two significance thresholds for GHG emissions. As discussed herein, the court disagrees. The EIR provides a single threshold of significance for GHG emissions. Page 4 of 21 the EIR concerning the selection of significance thresholds, the City reported "the Project would not have a significant effect on the environment if it is found to be consistent with the applicable regulatory plans and policies to reduce GHG emissions." (AR 920.) The City thereafter set forth the applicable plans and policies for which it considered consistency in the context of GHG emissions. (AR 14:920.) The EIR methodically discusses the Project and the applicable plans and policies. Petitioner has not demonstrated the EIR's significance threshold discussion would mislead or confuse decisionmakers or public participants. Second, without expressly so stating, much of Petitioner's argument related to GHG emissions theorizes the City abused its discretion in deciding not to use a quantitative threshold of significance for the Project. Petitioner contends the SCAQMD quantitative thresholds of significance should have been used for the Project as they are "the most appropriate ... to apply because the Project is a mixed -use project." (Opening Brief 14:17-18.) Petitioner thus contends the City engaged in "threshold shopping" for the Project. Petitioner speculates the City uses the SCAQMU's recommended thresholds of significance "to analyze projects where emissions are below the threshold." (Opening Brief 14:32-35.) Petitioner cites three such projects in the City's downtown area where the City used SCAQMD's thresholds of significance to find a project's GHG emissions had less than significant impacts. (AR 6495-6496.) The City explained it elected not to rely on SCAQMD's 2008 draft guidance (as revised in 2010) because neither the City nor SCAQMD "has adopted numeric thresholds for greenhouse gas emissions for land use development projects (e.g., residential/commercial projects) such as the Project.- (AR 2820.) The City elaborated: As further explained in the Draft EIR, in 2008, the SCAQMD convened a GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group to provide guidance to local lead agencies on determining significance for GHG emissions in their CEQA documents. In December 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted interim GHG significance thresholds for projects where the SCAQMD is the lead agency. That threshold uses a tiered approach to determine a project's significance, with 10,000 metric tons Of CO2 equivalent (MTCO2e) per year as a screening numerical threshold for stationary sources. In September 2010, the Working Group released additional revisions that recommended a screening threshold of 3,500 MTCO2e for residential projects, 1,400 MTCOze for commercial projects, and 3,000 MTCO2e for mixed use projects. The SCAQMD has not since adopted those thresholds, nor has the SCAQMD provided a timeline for formal consideration of those thresholds. In the meantime, the thresholds in the SCAQMD's guidance document are used as a non -binding guide. A lead agency is not required under CEQA to rely on draft regulatory standards that have not been adopted as significance thresholds. (AR 2820-2821.) Page 5 of 21 While the City may have chosen to use the SCAQMD's guidance as thresholds of significance (as it apparently has done with at least three other projects) in the past, the City was not required to do so. [Guidelines § 15064.7, subd. (c). See also Guidelines § 15064.4, subd. (b)(3).) The Guidelines do "not mandate the use of absolute numerical thresholds to measure the significance of greenhouse gas emissions." (Center for Biological Diversity v. Department of Fish & Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204, 221.) Accordingly, Petitioner has not met its burden of demonstrating the City's selection of the significance threshold is not supported by substantial evidence. Third, Petitioner contends the EIR's GHG emissions analysis is inconsistent with SB 32. That is, Petitioner attacks the City's finding the Project is "consisten[t) with the policies in SB 32 and Executive Order B-30-15, which includes the GHG reduction goals codified in SB 32." (Opposition Brief 17:2-3.) Petitioner contends "[t]he EIR includes compliance with Executive Order B-30-15 on the list of measures it must comply with for the Project's GHG emissions to be considered insignificant.. . and the Project does not comply with that executive order." (Reply 8:22-25.) Petitioner is correct to the extent there is no substantial evidence to support the City's position on Executive Order (EO) B-30-15. As an initial matter, the City and Flower Growers argue Petitioner failed to exhaust its administrative remedies on the issue of "CARB's 2017 Scoping Plan, which provides strategies to achieve the 2040 GHG emission goals set in SB 32." (Opposition Brief 17:12-14.) The court disagrees. The broader issue of overall compliance with SB 32--however that might be achieved —was squarely presented to the City during the administrative proceedings. SWAPS$ specifically raised the issue of SB 32 in its written comments to the DEIR. (AR 2900, 2922.) SWAPS wrote: AB 32 requires California to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. However, in September 2016, prior to the release of the IS/MIND, Governor Brown signed Senate Bill 32, enacting Health and Safety Code § 38566. [] This statue ("SB 32") requires California to achieve a new, more aggressive 40% reduction in GHG emissions over the 1990 levels by 2030. 'This 40 percent reduction is widely acknowledged as a necessary interim target to ensure that California meets its longer -range goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by the year 2050: Therefore, by failing to demonstrate consistency with the reduction targets set forth by SB 32, the Project may conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. As a result, the Project may have a potentially significant impact that was not previously addressed in the DEIR, and as such, a revised EIR should be prepared. (AR 2922.) BSWAPE is an acronym for Soil Water Air Protection Enterprises. SWAPE provides technical consultation, data analysis, and litigation support for the environment. (AR 2927.) Page 6 of 21 SWAPE also advised the City —with expert opinion —"to reach the statewide goal of 259 MTCO2'e, California would have to reduce its emissions by 49 percent below the'business-as- usual' levels. This reduction target indicates that compliance with these more aggressive reduction goals, beyond what is mandated by AB 32, will be necessary." (AR 2923.) As acknowledged by the City and Flower Growers, the legislature codified EO B-30-15 at 513 32. (Opposition Brief 17:3.) Executed by Governor Brown on April 29, 2015, two years before the notice of preparation, EO 8-30-15 provides in part: "A new interim statewide greenhouse emission reduction target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 is established in order to ensure California meets its target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050." SB 32, codified at Health and Safety Code section 38566, effective January 1, 2017 (prior to the City's notice of preparation) provides: "In adopting rules and regulations to achieve the maximum technologically feasible and cost-effective greenhouse gas emissions reductions authorized by this division, the state board shall ensure that statewide greenhouse gas emissions are reduced to at least 40 percent below the statewide greenhouse gas emissions limit no later than December 31, 2030." The EIR reports the Project's GHG emissions are "consistent"9 with EO 8-30-15. (AR 926.) The E1R's discussion of EO B-30-15 in its "Consistency Analysis" reports the order's target of reducing GHG emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030. (AR 926-927.) In fact, the EIR suggests the Project is actually consistent and compliant with Ea 8-30-15: "As such, given the reasonably anticipated decline in Project emissions once fully constructed and operational, the Project is consistent with the Executive Order's horizon -year goal.'"' (AR 926.) The issue raised by Petitioner is whether there is substantial evidence for the EIR's claim to decisionmakers and public participants the Project does not conflict with E0 B-30-15--"an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions" of GHG. (AR 14:917.) The City's position of consistency with EO 8-30-15 requires substantial evidence. 5 "Consistent" means "marked by harmony, regularity, or steady continuity" and "marked by agreement."(www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/consistent.) 10The EIR's use of a singular possessive form as opposed to a plural possessive form makes the analysis where the EIR discusses two executive orders unclear. In any event, the statement implies quantitative compliance with required GHG emission reductions by 2030. The City's findings, however, make clear the City intended the statement to apply to both executive orders. (AR 235.) Page 7 of 21 Certainly, the EIR acknowledges a 2030 GHG emissions target exists under the law; in its Consistency Analysis, however, the EIR provides no information about that target or how the Project's GHG emissions are consistent with it. The EIR's claim "the Project's post-2020 emissions trajectory is expected to follow a declining trend, consistent with the 2030 and 2050 targets and Executive Order. . . B-30-15" appears to be unsupported by substantial evidence. (AR 927.) Moreover, the EIR reports "[mjany of the emission reduction strategies recommended by CARE would serve to reduce the Project's post-2020 emissions level to the extent applicable by low ....0 (AR 927 [emphasis added].) The EIR, however, provides no analysis to support the claim the Project's GHG emissions comply with Health and Safety Code section 38566. That is, "applicable law."" in fact, the only evidence on the issue suggests otherwise. (AR 2923 (49 percent reduction required for compliance versus Project's 33 percent reduction).) During argument the Flower Growers directed the court to evidence the City could have considered to find the Project is consistent with EO B-30-15. The evidence, however, is not substantial evidence supporting the claim the Projees post-2020 emissions will be reduced to the level required by EO 13-30-15 as reported in the EIR. For example, the EIR's discussion of EO B-30-15 explains "a statewide GHG reduction target of 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030." (AR 902.) Citing a "recent study," the EIR reports "the state's existing and proposed regulatory framework will allow the state to reduce its GHG emissions level to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 (consistent with Executive Order B-30- 15), and to 60 percent below 1990 levels by 2050." (AR 903.) While the City cited the study by footnote, the study did not address the Project and its GKG emissions.12 Thus, the discussion and study are not substantial evidence of the Project's compliance with EO B-30-15. In addition, the Projeces reduction in GHG emissions related to design features (AR 924-925) does not address compliance with EO B-30-15. The order sets forth a quantitative standard. The EIR's general reference to design features and GHG does not inform on consistency with that quantitative standard. "The City found, "As such, the Project's post-2020 emissions trajectory is expected to follow a declining trend, consistent with the 2030 and 2050 targets and Executive Order S-3-05 and B-30- IS." (AR 235 [emphasis added],) The statement is misleading because it implies the Project meets EO 6-30-15's emissions target when there is no substantial evidence to support the City's position. 'Z The court does not have access to the study cited in the footnote. The EIR's narrative suggests the study concerned "various combinations of policies" to assist emission levels to "remain very low through 2050. .. ." (AR 903.) In the unlikely event the general study addressed the Project, the court notes "a report "buried in an appendix; is not a substitute for good faith reasoned analysis ...: " (Banning Ranch Conservancy v. City of Newport Beach (2017) 2 Cal.5th 918, 941 [citation omitted).) Page 8 of 21 The EIR's discussion of the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy of Southern California Association of Governments (SLAG) does address GHG emission reductions. (AR 911, 930-931.) The discussion, however, does not inform on the Project's consistency with EO B-30-15. Finally, relying on Cleveland National Forest Foundation v. San Diego Assn. of Governments (2017) 3 Cal.5th 497, the City argues it had no obligation to consider EO B-30-15. In Cleveland National Forest Foundation, the petitioners argued the agency "should have evaluated the plan's impacts against an executive order signed" by the governor. (ld. at 503.) The Supreme Court disagreed. The agency in Cleveland Notional Forest Foundation, however, did not adopt a significance threshold of express consistency with an executive order as the City did here. (See id. at 507 [three measures of significance].) That is, the agency in Cleveland National Forest Foundation did not represent the project was consistent with a particular executive order and establish its significance threshold in part on such consistency. Based on the foregoing, the court finds the EIR's claim of consistency with EO B-30-15 and the policies therein is not supported by substantial evidence. Thus, the EIR's conclusions that GHG emissions do not exceed the City's chosen significance threshold is unsupported. The City abused its discretion in finding GHG emissions would not have a Substantial environmental impact. "[A] conclusory discussion of an environmental impact that an EIR deems significant can be determined by a court to be inadequate as an informational document without reference to substantial evidence." (Friant Ranch, supra, 6 Cal.Sth at 514.) Petitioner is entitled to relief based on the EIR's incomplete discussion of GHG emission impacts.13 Air Quality Imaa_cts: The EIR reports the Project's construction emissions would cause significant regional and local air quality impacts based on nitrogen oxides (NOx) and fine particulate matter (PM2.5). (AR 843.) Thus, the Project required mitigation measures for air quality impacts. (AR 843.) Petitioner contends the EIR fails to adequately analyze and mitigate construction -related impacts on air quality. "During argument, the parties argued about the meaning of Table 4.F-5. (AR 922.) The City contended the table calculations demonstrated compliance with EO 8-30-15 while Petitioner argued it did not. The narrative accompanying the table indicates the Project is consistent with the 2014 Revised AB 32 Scoping Plan because of a reduction target of 15.3 percent. There is no discussion of EO B-30-15. Whether the table's information is consistent with EO B-3-15—and the court could not determine one way or the other even after the aid of argument —is undear and does not inform decisionmakers or public participation. Page 9 of 21 1. Mitigation Measure (MM) C-1 MM C-1 requires "[a]II off -road construction equipment greater than 50 horsepower" satisfy United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 'Tier 4 emissions standards to reduce NOx and PM2.5 emissions at the Project Site." (AR 849.) The EIR states "[a]ny emissions control device used by the contractor shall achieve emissions reductions that are no less than what could be achieved by a Level 3 diesel emissions control strategy for a similarly sized engine as defined by CARB regulations." (AR 849.) "For projects for which an EIR has been prepared, where substantial evidence supports the approving agency's conclusion that mitigation measures will be effective, courts will uphold such measures against attacks based on their alleged inadequacy." (Sacramento Did City Assn. v. City Council (1991) 229 Cal.App.3d 1011,1027.) A reviewing court, however, will not defer to the agency if there is no substantial evidence in the record showing the mitigation measure is feasible and effective, or if the feasibility or effectiveness of the mitigation measure "def[ies] common sense." (Gray v. County of Madera (2008) 167 Cal-App.4th 1099,1116-1117.) Petitioner contends MM C-1 is both ineffective and infeasible. The parties' argument here centers an the meaning of Tier 4 standards for the construction equipment to be used for the Project. Petitioner contends there are two Tier 4 standards —an interim standard and a final standard.14 Petitioner reports the CalEEMod calculations are based on a Tier 4 final standard —an assumption all construction equipment used for the Project with a horsepower greater than 50 comply Tier 4 final standards. (AR 2908 (citing Appendix E-1]; see also AR 1475-1478, 1507-1510, 1544-1547.) Therefore, to the extent MM C-1 permits the Flower Growers to use equipment with a Tier 4 interim standard, the required mitigation will not be achieved. That is, the CaIEEMod calculation on which the effectiveness of MM C-1 is based assumes a Tier 4 final standard for all construction equipment exceeding 50 horsepower. MM C-1, however, does not require all equipment to be Tier 4 final compliant. The City dismisses Petitioners claim as nothing more than a "red herring." (Opposition 21:18.) The City reasons Tier 4 "interim" standards were only in effect for a short period of time for certain manufacturers. The interim period ended in 2018 well before the City issued the EIR in 2019. (AR 2803, 4303-4304.) The EIR explains: 'Tier 4 engines have been phased in nationwide since 2008 for all engine types. While some manufacturers were given limited flexibility, to phase in compliant engines under the Transition Program for Equipment Manufacturers (TPEM), this provided up '" There seems to be no dispute Tier 4 final standards are more stringent (allow less emissions) than Tier 4 interim standards. (AR 2909, 2803.) Page 10 of 21 to seven years of additional time to offer such equipment. For engines less than 56 horsepower (hp), this TPEM period ended at the end of 2014. Engines between 56- 130 hp had until the end of 2018, while larger engines of 130 hp or more ended at the end of 2017. As a result, Tier 4 equipment is commercially available from all manufacturers, especially for common types of equipment to be used during the construction phases for this Project." (AR 2803 [emphasis added].) The City sidesteps and avoids the issue. (See AR 6621-6622.) MM C-1 relies on Tier 4 equipment. CalEEMod calculations —demonstrating effective mitigation —are based on Tier 4 final standards for construction equipment exceeding 50 horsepower. The City does not require, however, that all equipment exceeding 50 horsepower used for construction have been manufactured in 2019 and later —that is, when Tier 4 final standards were required. Thus, MM C-1 permits, for example, construction equipment with 130 horsepower manufactured in 2018 under the Tier 4 interim standard to be used on the Project. To the extent the City permits such equipment to be used, it would be inconsistent with CaIEEMod calculations and undermine the mitigation. During argument, the City suggested its interpretation of MM C-1 requires equipment for the Project to use Tier 4 final standards. The City contends its CaIEEMod calculations support its intent. That is, if the City did not intend for all equipment to meet such standards it would not have used such a setting in its CalEEMod calculations.15 The City also noted the Flower Growers concede MM C-1 requires Tier 4 final standard engines and so advised the City: "It should be noted that the measure refers to the use of Tier 4-certified engines, not the less effective Tier 4-interim certified engines." (AR 10136.) The MMRP will require compliance with Tier 4 final standards for MM C-1. Whether the Project is complying with MM C-1 will not turn on the good faith of an "on -the -hood -of -a -truck" analysis of the mitigation measure by a contractor, as suggested by Petitioner during argument. Instead, the MMRP requires: "[5]pecifically during the construction phase and prior to the issuance of building permits, the [Flower Growers] shall retain an independent Construction Monitor (either via the City or through a third -party consultant), approved by the City of is Additionally, the City differentiated between Tier 4 standards (which the City considers final standards) and Transition Program for Equipment Manufacturers (TPEM) standards in the EIR. Thus, the Citys language in MM C-1 would not support two Ter 4 standards, final and interim. Under the City's view, there is a Tier 4 standard and a TPEM standard. if the City had intended to include an "interim" Tier 4 standard in the MM, it would have used TPEM. In any event, this distinction provides additional support to the City's intent and the enforceable performance standard used for the MM. Page 11 of 21 Los Angeles Department of City Planning, who shall be responsible for monitoring implementation of Project design features and mitigation measures during construction activities consistent with the monitoring phase and frequency set forth in this [MMRP]." (AR 143.) Thus, while MM C-1 could have been more precise, the City's intent is clear, and the MM contains a specific performance standard. Moreover, the Flower Growers have acknowledged MM C-1 requires construction equipment with Tier 4 final standards (or its equivalent) be used for the Project. The MMRP will "ensure compliance during project implementation." (Pub. Resources Code § 21081.6, subd. (a).) While Petitioner contends the City uses a performance standard addressing only particulate but not NOx emissions (Opening Brief 18:14-19), the court is unpersuaded. MM C-1 requires any construction equipment meet both standards —Tier 4 final and a Level 3 diesel emission control strategy. (AR 849 ["In addition").) Based on the foregoing, the court finds the City's determination MM C-1 will be effective at mitigating air quality Impacts to a less -than -significant level during construction is supported by substantial evidence. a. Feasibility and Enforceability of MM C-1 According to Petitioner, MM C-1 "does not provide either feasible or enforceable means to ensure significant air quality impacts will be avoided." (Opening Brief 19:5-6.) Petitioner argues MM C-1 is inadequate to ensure avoidance of significant impacts to the air quality "because of practical obstacles in obtaining the required technology." (opening Brief 19:10-11.) Petitioner reports while Tier 4 standards have been phased in for construction equipment manufactured since 2008 (Tier 4 interim) and 2014 (Tier 4 Final), "a large portion of the construction equipment currently in use was manufactured to lower standards." (Opening Brief 19:16-17 [citing AR 2910-29111.)16 Petitioner contends the City's claim Tier 4 standards construction equipment is readily available is unsupported by substantial evidence. Thus, Petitioner claims the EIR's conclusion supporting feasibility —the availability of equipment — fails. Petitioner's argument alleging a lack of appropriate construction equipment is based on speculation. Petitioner's reliance on a seven -year -old report from 2014—just after Tier 4 final 16 "in 2014, 25°% of all offroad equipment in the state of California were equipped with Tier 2 engines, approximately 12% were equipped with Tier 3 engines, approximately 18% were equipped with Tier 4 Interim engines, and only 4% were equipped with Tier 4 Final engines." Page 12 of 21 standards phased in --does not meet Petitioner's burden on the issue. The City's position "it is reasonable to conclude that the market has produced many more Tier 4-compliant engines" since 2014 is reasonable and appropriate given Petitioner's speculation. (Opposition 23:2-3.) This is especially true given the passage of time and such equipment being available from all manufacturers. (AR 2806.) More importantly, if Flower Growers cannot secure specific Tier 4 equipment as required by MM C-1, Flower Growers will be required to "work with the City's Building and Safety Department on equivalent alternatives that minimize tailpipe emissions from off -road equipment." (AR 2803.) The term "equivalent" means the Flower Growers must demonstrate the proffered alternative "meets or exceeds" Tier 4 standards thereby meeting necessary emission reductions in NOx and PM2.5. (AR 4303-4304.) .Based on the speculative nature of Petitioner's claim concerning feasibility, the court finds Petitioner did not meet its burden of demonstrating the City abused its discretion when it found MM C-1 is feasible.17 2. Air Quality Impacts to Sensitive Receptors Petitioner takes issue with the City's selection and identification of sensitive receptors and their proximity to the Project. The flaw, according to Petitioner, undermines the EIR's air quality analysis. Petitioner notes the EIR identifies the "nearest" sensitive receptors at distances of 220 (school), 240 (apartment building), 440 (apartment building) and 700 (apartment building) feet from the Project. (AR 836.) Petitioner reports there is an apartment building within SS feet of the Project and another closer than 240 feet. (AR 778, 3173, 6874-6875.) Petitioner argues that these omissions are misleading by creating the impression for decisionmakers and the participating public there are few sensitive uses in close proximity to the Project."$ To the extent selection of a group of sensitive receptors is a methodology issue, the City is entitled to deference on its methodology.14 Thus, the decision is subject to substantial evidence review. (City of Long Beach v. Los Angeles Uni iedSchool Dist (2009) 176 Cal.App.4th 889, 898.) "The court's finding MM C-1 is effective sufficiently responds to Petitioner's claim concerning enforceability. 1'Additionally, Petitioner argues the EIR's air quality impacts on sensitive receptors is inadequate because it relies on the MM C-1 to render the impact less than significant. Of course, the court"s earlier analysis of MM C-1 would be equally applicable here. KThat said, the court is not persuaded the issue is, in fact, a methodology issue. Page 13 of 21 The City's use of SCAQMD guidance on the issue does not actually support selection issues. That is, nothing in the SCAQMD guidance instructs on selection of sensitive receptors over others. (AR 832-848, 845.) Thus, the SCAQMD guidance is not substantial evidence. In the EIR, the City "disclose[d) the location of a number of representative sensitive receptors near the Project Site" including residential and non-residential uses. (AR 7232.) The City's response to public comment is instructive: "Almost all of the other residential uses identified by the commenter are at the same distance from the Project site as the Santee Court Apartments (i.e., the Santee Village Apartments) or even a further distance away from the Project site (i.e., the Garment Lofts are 40 feet further away than the Santee Court Apartments and the Santee Village Lofts are 60 feet further away than the Santee Court Apartments). Moreover, compliance with SCAQMD's thresholds of significance will avoid any significant impact to any of these sensitive receptors and the EIR demonstrates that mitigated construction emissions would be less than all the SCAQMD's thresholds of significance. (Refer to Draft EIR, pages 4.C-19 through 23.) This conclusion would apply regardless of the location of any receptor pursuant to SCAQMD guidance." (AR 7232; see also AR 3570-3571.) The court finds Petitioner has not met its burden of demonstrating a prejudicial abuse of discretion even assuming the City abused its discretion in its selection of sensitive receptors. Petitioner has not suggested any legal requirement that every sensitive receptor within close proximity of a Project must be identified. "'CEQA requires only that the agency 'use its best efforts to find out and disclose all that it reasonably can' (Guidelines, § 15144), and that the EIR display 'adequacy, completeness, and a good faith effort at full disclosure' (Guidelines, § 15151)." (Planning & Conservation League v. Castok Lake Water Agency (2009)180 Cal.App.4th 210, 253. ) Further, Petitioner fails to demonstrate the City sampling is misleading --other than to the extent the City did not include every single sensitive receptor in close proximity to the Project. The City's expert concluded the Project would avoid significant impacts to all receptors in the vicinity because the Project's mitigated construction emissions will fall below SCAQMD's thresholds measured at the source of the emissions. (AR 3570-3571, 4068, 7232.) Petitioner does not suggest with evidence the EIR's analysis and conclusions would be different with respect to the omitted sensitive receptors as opposed to the receptors the City considered and analyzed. Accordingly, Petitioner shows no prejudicial abuse of discretion. Page 14 of 21 3. Disctasure of Health Risks Associated with Air Quality Impacts Petitioner argues the Project fails to adequately discuss the connections between potential pollutant emissions and resulting human health impacts. Such analysis, Petitioner contends, is required by Guidelines section 15126.2, subdivision (a). Petitioner asserts the EIR failed to discuss the health risks related to the estimated level of construction and operational emissions. (AR 827-850.) The EIR therefore does not comply with the Supreme Court's direction in Friant Ranch that a "[p]roject's health effects must be "clearly identified" and the discussion must include "relevant specifics" about the environmental changes attributable to the Project and their associated health outcomes." (Friant Ranch, supra, 6 Cal.Sth at 518.) Further, Petitioner argues the City's 2019 Health Risk Assessment (HRA) does not "fill the gap in the EIR's analysis." (Opening Brief 23:28.) The HRA contains no analysis of operational emissions and merely addresses construction -related emissions of diesel particulate matter. (AR 846.) Under 5CAQMD guidance, an HRA is recommended for "substantial sources of diesel particulate emissions (e.g., truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities) ...." (AR 846.) The City determined —and there is no challenge to the City's finding —the "Project would not result in any substantial emissions of toxic air contaminants (TAC) during the construction or operations phase." (AR 846.) The EIR explains: "The Project would not result in any substantial emissions of toxic air contaminants (TACs) during the construction or operations phase. During the construction phase, the primary air quality impacts would be associated with the combustion of diesel fuels, which produce exhaust -related particulate matter that is considered a toxic air contaminant by GARB based on chronic exposure to these emissions. However, construction activities would not produce chronic, long-term exposure to diesel particulate matter. During long-term project operations, the Project does not include typical sources of acutely and chronically hazardous TACs such as industrial manufacturing processes and automotive repair facilities. As a result, the Project would not create substantial concentrations of TACs. In addition, the SCAQM❑ recommends that health risk assessments be conducted for substantial sources of diesel particulate emissions (e.g., truck stops and warehouse distribution facilities) and has provided guidance for analyzing mobile source diesel emissions. The Project would not generate a substantial number of truck trips. Based on the limited activity of TAC sources, the Project would not Page 15 of 21 warrant the need for a health risk assessment associated with on -site activities. Therefore, Project impacts related to TACs would be less than significant." (AR 846; see also AR 2964-66.) Contrary to Petitioner's position, Friant Ranch, does not require more from the City. The Project does not exceed any SCAQMD significance threshold for air quality impacts or trigger any criteria requiring an HRA. Petitioner has not met its burden of demonstrating a prejudicial abuse of discretion based on a failure to adequately discuss the connections between potential pollutant emissions and resulting human health impacts 2° Noise Impacts: Petitioner contends the EIR fails to adequately analyze and mitigate construction -related environmental impacts as to noise. 1. Disclosure of Impacts to Sensitive Receptors Petitioner takes issue with the EIR's purported failure to analyze the construction -noise impacts at the Textile Building Lofts, a location merely 55 feet from the Project. The EIR does not contain any noise analysis to any sensitive receptors at this location. In fact, the first discussion by the City about the noise impacts to the Textile Building Lofts is contained in Erratum No. 3. (AR 3173, 3342-3343.) Petitioner contends the City's analysis is flawed. Petitioner believes the daytime ambient noise level of 64.8 dBA, based on measurements on Maple Avenue, is overstated for the Textile Building Lofts. (AR 3343.) The City's inaccurate 64.8 dBA daytime noise level assumption, according to Petitioner, led to a conclusion of only a 1.3 dBA daytime noise level increase such that the Project's construction -noise impacts did not exceed the 5 dBA level noise increase significance threshold. (AR 3343.) Based on expert opinion, however, Petitioner reports the City's ambient noise level determination failed to take into account the 12-story height of the Textile Building Lofts. Higher stories have lower ambient noise levels. (AR 10085-10086 [identifying ambient noise is as low as 58.5 for the twelfth floor].) The daytime ambient noise levels are not the same "for all floors of the Textile Building [Lofts] because the higher floors are farther from the road traffic than lower floors." (AR 10085.) Thus, the City's conclusion construction -noise related impacts 20 Petitioner appears to have abandoned the argument in reply. Page 16 of 21 to the Textile Building Lofts is flawed --it is based on an '"unsupported assumption about existing ambient noise levels." (Opening Brief 25:15-16.) The City's expert does not address the ambient daytime noise level for the higher floors of the Textile Building Lofts. The City's expert did consider the building, however, using the same methodology used in the DEIR. (AR 4305.) The City's expert determined the Textile Building Lofts would experience an increase in noise based on construction of 1.3 dBA (or less). (AR 3173-74, 7229.) Further, Project construction -related noise impacts are expected to remain below the City's 5 dBA significance threshold. (AR 3343, 7229.) In a June 19, 2019 memorandum, the City's noise expert explained: "[T]his [Maple Street for the Textile Building Lofts] baseline noise level is far greater than the 50.8 dBA Leq noise level used to represent baseline conditions at the Santee Court Apartments receptor. Utilizing the same construction source and mitigation assumptions that were used for the Santee Court Apartments analysis, as Textile Building Lofts would benefit from the same mitigation measures intended to reduce construction noise impacts at Santee Court Apartments, Textile Building Lofts would be projected to experience a construction -related noise increase of just 1.3 dBA Leq, similar to but less than the 1.6 dBA Leq impact that would occur at Santee Court Apartments. The noise impact at Textile Building Lofts would not exceed the 5 dBA noise increase threshold; in fact, it would not exceed the 3 dBA Leq threshold of perceptibility that represents when noise conditions may be noticeably louder." (AR 7229.) While Petitioner relies expert opinion to dispute and contradict the City's expert technical report, Petitioner has not demonstrated the City's expert studies are so "clearly inadequate or unsupported" as to be "entitled to no judicial deference." (See Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal.3d 376,409 fn. 12. ["A clearly inadequate or unsupported study is entitled to no judicial deference.."]] "When an agency is faced with conflicting evidence on an issue, it is permitted to give more weight to some of the evidence and to favor the opinions of some experts over others. (Association of Irritated Residents v. County of Madera (2003) 107 Cal.App.4th 1383,1397.) Accordingly, Petitioner failed to meet its burden of demonstrating a prejudicial abuse of discretion related to the City's analysis of construction -related noise impacts. (See State Water Resources Control Bd. Cases (2006) 136 Cal.App.4th 674, 795. ['The party challenging the EIR, however, bears the burden of demonstrating that the studies on which the EIR is based 'are clearly inadequate or unsupported "']) Page 17 of 21 Z Feasibility and Effectiveness of MM 1-1 and 1-2 Petitioner argues MM 1-1 and 1-2 are vague, ineffective and unenforceable. a. MM 1-1 "To ensure that the Project's construction -related noise levels do not exceed 75 dBA and that construction -related noise increases at Santee Court Apartments do not exceed 5 dBA," the City adopted MM 1-1. MM 1-1 provides "(a)II capable diesel -powered construction vehicles shall be equipped with exhaust mufflers or other suitable noise reduction devices." (AR 1011.) Petitioner contends MM 1-1 does not establish a performance standard because nothing in the mitigation measure sets a required noise level reduction. Petitioner argues muffler use alone does not ensure MM 1-1 will achieve any particular level of mitigation. Petitioner asserts "the fact that exhaust mufflers should or could reduce equipment noise by 3 dBA or more doesn't address the fact that the measure, as written, does not require mitigation at that level and therefore does not ensure that level of mitigation will be achieved, as is necessary to support the finding of no significant impacts from construction noise." (Opening Brief 28:18-22.) As noted earlier, "For projects for which an EIR has been prepared, where substantial evidence supports the approving agency's conclusion that mitigation measures will be effective, courts will uphold such measures against attacks based on their alleged inadequacy." (Sacramento Old City Assn. v. City Council, supra, 229 Cal.App.3d at 1027.) The City contends MM 1-1 as written will be effective. The use of mufflers to abate noise impacts is considered 'best practices" and recommended under the City's CEQA threshold guide. (AR 2773, 2786-2787, 7299,10131-10132 (EPA's Office of Noise Abatement and Control Study],10139.)z1 In addition, the City's noise expert confirmed the use of mufflers as required by MM 1-1 would achieve a 3 dBA noise reduction. (AR 3085-3085, 10139-10140.) The expert explained "aftermarket mufflers reduce noise by over 3 dBA. (AR 10139.) In addition, the Project's MMRP requires the Flower Growers to retain an independent Construction Monitor, approved by the City, responsible for: (a) ensuring that "capable" mufflers are used during construction; and (b) documenting compliance. (AR 2848-2849.) While the court agrees MM 1-1 does not contain a specific performance standard, it does mandate the use of certain equipment that does have performance standards. Substantial evidence supports the City's conclusion the use of mufflers will be effective at reducing noise levels by at least 3 dBA. The City's noise expert reviewed aftermarket muffler manufacturer u The EPA study, upon which the City's CEQA Threshold Guide relies, shows that "equipment mufflers should reduce excavation and grading phase noise levels by 3 dBA. (AR 10131.) Page 18 of 21 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 6, 2024 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT CATHY MORTON PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE - OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS From: Cathy Morton <cmorton_8@icloud.com> Sent: Monday, August 5, 2024 4:00 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: Written Comments - Travertine Project - August 6, 2024 agenda Hello, I am writing with my comments with respect to the proposed Travertine project (item 2 under "Public Hearings" on the August 6, 2024 meeting agenda). I am a resident of the neighboring Trilogy development, and am opposed to the creation of an elevated roadway on Avenue 62 to access the Travertine development (the elevation being necessary because of a high berm that the road would need to cross). I understand that the road would have to rise to 36 feet in order to clear the 30-foot berm without touching it. To do this, the rise would have to start 600 feet before the berm. also understand that over 6000 cars are expected to cross the berm daily. An elevated roadway would have a significant impact on Trilogy residents in terms of noise, air pollution, light and aesthetics. I think the better and more logical solution is to extend the south end of Jefferson Street to provide access to Travertine. This would be more convenient for the eventual residents of Travertine as well as having minimal, if any, impact on the residents of Trilogy. Thank you for your consideration. Cathy Morton 81435 Joshua Tree Court La Quinta, CA 92253 CITY COUNCIL MEETING -AUGUST 6, 2024 -WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT JOHN PERRY PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE - OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT From: John Perry <john.perry.tlgma@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, August 4, 2024 3:11 PM To: John K. Miller Cc: Kathleen Fitzpatrick; City Clerk Mail; Deborah McGarrey; John Pena; Linda Evans; Steve Sanchez Subject: Re: Written Comments - John Miller, La Quinta, Travertine Development Bravo! On Sun, Aug 4, 2024 at 10:03 AM John K. Miller <jkmillergroup@gmail.com> wrote: Dear Madam Mayor and Council Members, I am John Miller, and I own 81455 Golden Poppy Way in Trilogy La Quinta. I have lived in La Quinta for over 24 years and am happy to call it my home. As a Realtor, I have represented over 1,300 clients over the past 21 years, most of whom chose Trilogy La Quinta for its remote, peaceful, and tranquil location backing up to the Santa Rosa Mountains. I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed 1200-home Travertine development, particularly the planned primary arterial access routed through Avenue 62. As a resident and community advocate, I have several significant concerns about this development's adverse impacts on our area. Firstly, the proposed bridge over the existing dike on Avenue 62 to facilitate access to Travertine will dramatically increase noise and traffic throughout our community. This surge in traffic will result in higher emissions and greenhouse gases, which is counterproductive to our collective efforts to reduce our environmental footprint and combat climate change. The influx of vehicles will contribute to air pollution, negatively impacting the health and well-being of current residents. Moreover, the noise generated by the increased traffic, mainly from vehicles crossing the newly constructed bridge, will disrupt the tranquility of our neighborhood. The residents of Trilogy La Quinta chose this community for its peaceful environment, and introducing this development will undermine the quality of life we currently enjoy. The constant noise pollution will be a source of stress and discomfort for many residents, especially those closest to Avenue 62. Another critical concern is the potential impact on the local wildlife, specifically the Bighorn sheep that inhabit this region. The construction and increased human activity will likely disturb their natural habitat, threatening survival. Protecting our local wildlife is essential, and the proposed development poses a significant risk to these animals. Additionally, the infrastructure in our area may need to be equipped to handle the substantial increase in traffic and population density. The strain on local roads, public services, and amenities could lead to congestion and reduced service quality, further diminishing the living standards for current and future residents. In conclusion, I strongly urge the city council to reconsider the access plan for the Travertine development. Routing the main arterial through Avenue 62 is not sustainable or community -friendly. I recommend exploring alternative access points that will minimize the environmental impact, preserve the peace of existing neighborhoods, and protect our local wildlife. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that the city council will take these concerns seriously and decide to prioritize the well-being of current residents and the environment. Sincerely, John K Miller John K. Miller I President Trilogy Onsite Sales Office, 60750 Trilogy Parkway, La Quinta, CA 92253 BD Luxe Office, 47350 Washington Street, Suite 101, La Quinta, CA 92253 0 Cell: 760.285.3642 1 Fax: 877.251.4775 1 Office: 760.564.3161 Email: JKMillerGroup c( gmail.com I CaIDRE: 01371356 Website: www.JohnKevinMiller.com CITY COUNCIL MEETING - AUGUST 6, 2024 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RANDALL BONE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF SUNRISE COMPANY - PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE - LETTER IN SUPPORT OF THE PROJECT From: Julie Bloom <jbloom@sunriseco.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 6, 2024 9:13 AM To: Planning WebMail <Planning@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Letter of Support for Travertine Please see the attached letter of support for Travertine. Thank you. i SUNUS COMPANY August 6, 2024 Dear City of La Quinta Planning Commission and Staff, Sunrise Company supports the Travertine development in La Quinta. Sunrise Company has been developing master -planned communities in the Desert for over 60 years. We are currently developing Andalusia Country Club in La Quinta and Toscana Country Club in Indian Wells. We are not speaking on behalf of individual Andalusia Country Club residents but on behalf of Sunrise Company. Our main priority is ensuring the long-term success of Andalusia, both the Club and the residential community. After studying the new plan, we support the new plan and believe Travertine will enhance the surrounding communities and the overall La Quinta community. The Travertine community will also bring economic vitality to La Quinta for decades to come. Thank you for your due diligence on this and all other developments. Sincerely, Randall Bone Chief Executive Officer Sunrise Company 300 Eagle Dance Circle I Palm Desert, California 92211 1 www.sunriseco.com 1 760-772-7227 HAND OUTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 6, 202 4 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 6, 2024 - HANDOUT BY MARK ROGERS PRINCIPAL WITH TRG LAND AND APPLICANT FOR THE PROJECT - PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE Transcription from 6/25/24 Planning Commission Meeting Dale Tyerman: The Jefferson Extension, on may 281" when we briefly talked about this there was some work yet to be done in order to be able to assure that the Jefferson ext could be completed I spencifically remembered some things about right away agreements that would have to be ... let me just ask the question, are there any obstacles to completing Jeferson ext from a legal perspective with coral canyon dev regulatory issues, I already heard that it's been well researched as part of the EIR, so it doesn't sound like there are any ceqa issues related to any ... are there any obstacles that if tomorrow you wanted to build the Jefferson ext, you could build it. Mark Rogers: There are no obstacles, we simply put, and I think I failed to really illuminate this in the last meeting. We have both our sewer and water coming over Ave 62. There are points of connections at Monroe and Ave 62, so that's our sewer and water connection. We have a loop condition where Madison will bring another water line over for fire purposes we have to have two sources a loop condition for water. All of our Utilities come from the east at Monroe and Ave 62 over the dike to the project. We also have to build two big water tanks up the hill on the south side of the project in order to drop lumber to build the homes. All of our infrastructure happens at the southerly part of this project and then Jefferson is really just a road bed probably some dry utilities that will go north and meet up with a realigned Ave 58, we'll have to put a bend in the road and there's nothing that prevents us from doing that except sound logic and development and we don't want to build all that by ourselves right now and we really have to build everything from the south coming from Madison and Ave 62 to get this project to have sewer and have water, which are essential. Sop all of our utilities come from that direction and the project is really born from the south side moving north. When we get to 600 units, I am hopeful that coral canyon be in the game and be able to help us with the construction of Ave 62/Jefferson based on the General Plan alignment that were going to adopt with this project, which is a dedicated alignment that was offered up to the city and accepted by the coral canyon project and that will be built and there's nothing that will get in the way of doing that. Dale Tyerman: Okay, so the only barriers to doing the extension of Jefferson are economic? Mark Rogers: Infrastructure Dale Tyerman: And satisfying the build out plan internal Mark Rogers: Infrastructure, you gotta have sewer and water or you can't have a project. Dale Tyerman: Right Mark Rogers: And that's all coming from the other direction. Dale Tyerman: Do the sewer and water require the roadway to cross the berm/extension of Ave 62? Mark Rogers: Yes Dale Tyerman: You can't get sewer and water there without building the roadway over the dam ... over the dike? Mark Rogers: That's what's precipitating the 6' of cover, so from the surface of the road to the top of the existing dike, we need 6' to put those utilities beneath the road bed. Dale Tyerman: So you are using that and it makes perfect sense, you're utilizing that 6' gap to run your necessary water and power to the development. Mark Rogers: Sewer, sewer is a big one. Dale Tyerman: Sewer, excuse me. If Jefferson Extension were completed, is there a need for Ave 62 or does an entrance/exit of Jefferson along with the Emergency Vehicle Access on Madison satisfy the regulatory Fire, Etc., requirements for access into the property. Mark Rogers: No, Ave 62 and Jefferson are both necessary, distribution of traffic throughout the city going to be dependent on that, it's all built on the model. Madison as an EVA will not go away. We're not going to build a road and then eliminate it. So it will remain as an emergency vehicular access that provides greater access for fire and police should they need it, or exiting the project by residents should they need it. So all of these have been well thought out and orchestrated with the city and the city staff with our team in a sequence of events that lead to a successful project in phases, and that's how we plan Dale Tyerman: Thank you. Thank you, Mark. And just one quick question on Short Term Vacation Rentals.... CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 6, 2024 - HANDOUT BY RESIDENT CAROLYN WINNOR PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE PROJECT La Quinta Village Apartments Versus Avenue 62 Elevated Roadway Carolyn Winnor La Quinta On August 1., 2023 you sent La Quinta Village Apartments back to the Planning Commission one condition was to drop it to two stories Two Story Building is 28 feet 6 inches Three Story Building is 38 feet 6 inches Roadway height is 36 feet Top of a vehicle is 42-50 feet CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 6, 2024 - HANDOUT BY MARK ROGERS PRINCIPAL WITH TRG LAND AND APPLICANT FOR THE PROJECT - PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE What should be your direction for this? • You can't drop the berm from 30 feet to 20 feet • You can ask for Utilities only to cross Avenue 62 • You can ask for the main entrance to Travertine to be the Jefferson Street Extension CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 6, 2024 - HANDOUT BY RESIDENT BOBBIE FLEURY PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE PROJECT Splitting the Utilities and the Roadway Bobbie Fleury La Qu i nta CA 92253 Si28/24. During the June 25 Planning Commission Meeting., Applicant Mark Rogers was asked the following question by a Commissioner: "Are there any obstacles to completing the Jefferson extension from a legal perspective, with the Coral Canyon development, with any regulatory issues; I have already heard it has been well researched from the EIR perspective, so no CEQA issues. Are there any obstacles if tomorrow you wanted to build the Jefferson Extension can you do it?" The answer from the Travertine applicant Mark Rogers: "There are no obstacles:' 5/28/24 The Applicant feels he needs to use Avenue 62 for the elevated roadway and for the Utilities However, Per the Bureau of Reclamation, a license can be granted for just a utilities crossing: § 429.10 What application form should I use? You must use one of the following application forms depending on the nature of your requested use: (a) Use SF 299 to request a use authorization for the placement, construction, and use of energy, transportation, water, or telecommunication systems and facilities on or across all Federal property including Reclamation land, facilities, or waterbodies. Examples of such uses are: (1) Canals; (2) Communication towers; (3) Fiber -optics cable; (4) Pipelines; (5) Roads; (6) Telephone lines; and (7) Utilities and utility corridors. 8/06/24 Flores, Cynthia (Cindy) <cfIores @)usbr.gov> ff) Re: Thank you and Utilities only crossing? [EXTERNAL] Ms. Flores, the two most important questions for City Council me... To: plena Callimanis <acallimanis,4>gmail.cUm> Sid Found a Contact Cynthia Flores Add cflores', usbr.gov Good Morning, Alena—Reclamation does consider various requests for crossings of our facilities, to include utilities only crossings. I am not an engineer, so I am unable to comment in this particular case as to whether a road crossing must accompany the utilities crossing. Regarding my second response below, we require compliance with the Clean Air Act as well as the Clean Water Act. hope this helps. Thanks, Cindy Cindy M. Flores Manager, Water and Lands Contracts Group Bureau of Reclamation Interior Region 8: Lower Colorado Basin Yuma Area Office (928) 343-8261 (office) (928) 276-2140 (cell) cflores@usbr.gov — BUREAU OF — RECLAMATION 8/06/24 J 10, fj ' l ^;c Delete Junk Reply Reply All Farvl- Flores, Cynthia (Cindy) <cflores@usbr.gov> a Re: [EXTERNAL] Ms. Flores: her is the note to Ms. Pinell, thank you for our discussion on Travertine To: Good Afternoon, Alena—please find Reclamation's responses to the questions in your email: 1. We have not received an application for the renewal of Contract No. 1-07-30-L0346. 2. Due to the age of the casefile, we would have to research the application information related to Contract - L0346 noted above. That information is not readily available. 3. Consideration of an application for a use authorization is contingent on Reclamation's review and approval of engineering design plans, related technical analyses and reports, and completed environmental compliance documentation for compatibility with Reclamation's project purposes. 4. Unless otherwise provided by law or regulation, only Reclamation (or another Federal agency acting for Reclamation under delegated authority) is authorized to issue use authorizations for use of its lands and facilities. 6. We cannot comment on the Planning Commission's processes. 6. Dike 4 was constructed in the 1967-1968 timeframe for purposes of flood control and it remains today for that purpose. The dike protects the area from floodwaters from the upstream canyons and provides a detention reservoir to store the floodwaters. 7. Incidental, individual, non-commercial use of Reclamation lands and facilities by the public does not require authorization so long as Reclamation's lands and facilities are not damaged or otherwise negatively impacted. More information on Reclamation's use authorization process can be found here: httR,s ://www. ecf r. gov/cu rrent/title-43/subtitle-B/chapter- I/part-429 I hope this information is helpful, Alena. Please let me know if you have additional questions. Thanks, Cindy Cindy M. Flores Manager, Water and Lands Contracts Group Bureau of Reclamation Interior Region 8: Lower Colorado Basin Yuma Area Office (928) 343-8261 (office) (928) 276-2140 (cell) cflores@usbr.gov 8/06/24 na, — BUREAU OF — RF., AMATION Since there was no issue per the applicant, the main construction and operations entrance and exit can be the Jefferson Street extension • It does not have the 36 foot elevated roadway • It is generally extremely flat • It will be significantly cheaper to grade and prepare the roadway • It is a much more scenic entrance • It is cheaper to build a flat road! • Dikes and culverts along Jefferson extension are significantly lower and have no houses anywhere nearby • It is infinitely easier to do utilities only over Avenue 62 versus the extremely complicated and costly process to elevate the roadway over Avenue 62. • You can start development of Travertine much sooner 5/28/24 A win -win solution • Make the utilities only crossing at Avenue 62 a condition of approval for Travertine • Complete the Jefferson Extension as the Condition of Approval for Travertine as the only construction and operation entrance and remove Avenue 62 as an elevated Roadway into Travertine Thankyou! CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 6, 2024 - HANDOUT BY RESIDENT SHEILA WARREN PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE PROJECT Travertine Noise Impact over Elevated Roadway Sheila Warren La Qu i nta What are the parameters for measuring Sound Impact Table 4.12-S Significance of Noise Impacts at Noise -Sensitive Receivers Without Project Noise Level Potential Significant Impact < 60 dBA 5 dBA or more 60 - 65 dBA 3 dBA or more, > 65 dBA 1.5 dBA or more Source: Federal Interagency Committee on Noise (FICON), 1992. ----------------------------------------- What is the ambient of actual noise level along Avenue 62 • Avenue 62 had the following ambient noise levels • Daytime, 7:OOAM to 10:OOPM of 49.8 decibels • Nightime, from 10:00pm to 7:OOAM was 48.2. • However, using the CNEL factors that are applied to ambient noise, Urban Crossroads used a 24 hour measurement of 55.2 decibels. • The only quieter location is the mansion in the middle of the date farm south of Avenue 62 • That had daytime of 42.9 and a nighttime of 42.2. CNEL for them is 49. What generates noise level along Avenue 62 • After the Trilogy Maintenance Yard closes, for example at 4:45 as it did last Friday, there are no vehicles on that road. • So there is no entrance or exit to Trilogy off Avenue 62, and for the date farm south of 62, the main entrance to the house is off Monroe. • So there is truly no noise generated there from after the maintenance yard closes until it opens the next morning, which is greater than 12 hours. So how did we fare? • So now when an analysis is done, we are starting at a level of 55.2 decibels • That means, by starting at that level and not the actual ambient sound, all of a sudden noise levels are not a significant impact on us • The original EIR did not even look at noise from the elevated roadway Future Sound projections TABLE 3: AVENUE 62 EXTERIOR TRAFFIC NOISE LEVEL COMPLIANCE Receiver Location' Address Av. 62 Traffic Noise Levels (dBA CNEL)2 Exterior Noise level Standards (dBA CNEL)3 Noise Level Standards Exceeded?' R1 81272 Jasmine Ct. 52.9 65 No R2 81260 Jasmine Ct. 56.7 65 No R3 81271 Jasmine Ct. 59.9 65 No R4 81283 Jasmine Ct. 58.7 65 No R5 81295 Jasmine Ct. 55.8 65 No R6 81307 Jasmine Ct. 52.1 65 No R7 81319 Jasmine Ct. 54.8 65 No R8 81337 Rustic Cyn. Dr. 55.0 65 No R9 81349 Rustic Cyn. Rd. 57.7 65 No R10 81361 Rustic Cyn. Rd. 57.2 65 No ' See Exhibit A for the receiver locations. z Future Avenue 62 exterior traffic noise levels with crossing over Dike #4. 3 City of La Quinta General Plan Noise Element Policy N-1.2) 4 Do the estimated Avenue 62 traffic noise levels exceed the noise level standards? What were the parameters • One car at a time? • Two cars passing each other at the same time on the roadway? • Two cars going up at the same time? • What is the impact of the berm (dike 4) to noise transmission? • We found a noise expert who could help us corroborate or do our own study • However, we were denied a request to get the data to understand how what parameters were used 14000 trips a day TABLE 1: ROADWAY PARAMETERS ID Road Segment Classification 2040 Average Daily Traffic Volume Near/Far Lane Distance (Feet)2 Speed (mph) 6 Av. 62 w/o Monroe St. Modified Secondary 14,000 42' 50 Source: Travertine Specific Plan Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) • Let's just do pure averages: 14,000 trips divided by 24 hours a day equals 583 vehicles per hour • This is 10 vehicles every minute • One car every six seconds • Now extrapolate that to real hours during the day — a car every second • And then tell us there will be no noise impact in an area where the original ambient noise was considered quiet by CEQA standards Think about the Visual Impact • Enough said What is the consequence of constant, unwanted noise • It can have adverse effects on health, especially with sensitive receptors (again, this means older people like us!) Noise carries down the berm • Everyone who lives along the will tell you they hear every word • Including both sides of a phone conversation • What is the impact of the berm (dike 4) to noise transmission? • It will make it worse What is the only solution? • Stop the Avenue 62 elevated roadway • Make Avenue 62 a utilities only crossing • Move the main entrance to the Jefferson Extension CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 6, 2024 - HANDOUT BY RESIDENT JUDY VIERA PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE PROJECT What about Elevated Roadway lighting and headlights? Judy Viera La Qu i nta Nowhere does the DEIR address the following items • Roadway lighting on the elevated roadway • With the lights needed to illuminate the elevated roadway, and with the height above the berm, counting the 6 feet for the roadway height, plus 9 to 10 feet for the lights, there is no way that we won't see the lights. • They will be 15 feet or more above the existing berm • How about headlights? They will be constant, first shining up, level and shining down. And with multiple vehicles every minute, it will be constant Here are just pictures of cars at night — please picture it coming over the berm 3 What is the solution? • City Council, please put a Condition of Approval on this project for a Utilities only crossing on Avenue 62 • City Council, please put a Condition of Approval on this project for the Main Travertine entrance to be the Jefferson Extension CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 6, 2024 - HANDOUT BY RESIDENT LAURA DuMAURIER PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE PROJECT Honorable Mayor Evans, Mayor Pro Tem Pena, City Council members and staff. My name is Laura DuMaurier and I am a Trilogy Resident. In this presentation I will be discussing the issue of Air Quality on the folks in Trilogy and potentially other surrounding residences. But first I want to address the elephant in the room. When the applicant talks about the "Travertine Project" or just "Project", they are talking about what is happening on the inside of Dike 4. So let me contrast that by saying Trilogy and the rest of La Quinta is on the outside of Dike 4. This same distinction is in the EIR. You have seen this reflected many times by the reference that Trilogy will not see the project. The pictures in the EIR have this big red line a few feet below the top of dike 4 with the comments that the 30 foot dike blocks any view of Travertine. This is absolutely correct and we all agree. We will NOT see the Travertine project from Trilogy because of the 30 foot high dike 4, which the Bureau of Reclamation states was constructed in the 1967-1968 timeframe for purposes of flood control and it remains today for that purpose. The dike protects the area from floodwaters from the upstream canyons and provides a detention reservoir to store the floodwaters. But let us look at Air Quality. Section 4.3, in the EIR, analyzed Air Quality. The Project -specific Air Quality Impact Analysis analyzed the Project's potential short-term (construction) and long-term (operational) air quality impacts on public health. Sensitive receptors are defined to include the elderly. That is us in Trilogy. The conclusion was that the Project would not expose sensitive receptors (again us) to substantial pollutant concentrations. Here we go again. The Project totally ignores the significant impact of the pollution from the elevated roadway over Dike 4. With the initial vehicle traffic of 6000 cars a day for phase one, going up to a potential of 12,000 or more cars per day at buildout, the pollution from vehicle exhaust and green house gas emissions with be significant. Since the roadway starts at 36 feet above Trilogy, and roadway vehicles above that point, the impact of these concentrated pollutants going through the air to both close in and distant houses through wind, will have a significant impact that cannot be ignored or mitigated. As you know, the US Environmental Protection Agency sets nationwide air quality and emissions standards and oversees state efforts and enforcement. The California Air Resources Board focuses on California's unique air quality challenges by setting the state's own stricter emissions standards for a range of statewide pollution sources including vehicles, fuels and consumer products. In particular, it sets the state's air quality standards at levels that protect those at greatest risk — children, older adults and people with lung and heart disease and identifies pollutants that pose the greatest health risks, such as diesel exhaust particles and benzene in gasoline. The EIR does NOTHING to analyze the impact of the elevated roadway on the Trilogy sensitive receptors. As part of Bureau of Reclamation's consideration for approval and licensing of any project on its lands and facilities, this agency requires compliance with all applicable requirements under the National Environmental Policy Act. Additionally, their use authorizations contain the following standard stipulations: To comply with all Federal, State, and local requirements of the Clean Air Act (CAA) Since nothing has been done to analyze the elevated roadway effects for the Clean Air Act, the only way to solve this significant omission in the DEIR is to remove the Avenue 62 elevated roadway from consideration, and to make the main entrance to Travertine to be the Jefferson Street Extension, where this won't be a factor in getting government approvals required for the project. Thank you very much. CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 6, 2024 - HANDOUT BY RESIDENT ROBERT LASSER PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE PROJECT La Quinta City Council La Quinta City Hall 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 August 6, 2024 Re: Specific Objection to the planned Elevated Roadway Ave 62 entrance to the proposed Travertine Development. Hello Honorable Mayor Evans, City Council members, and Staff. My Name is Robert Lasser, and I live in La Quinta. I am writing today not to oppose the Travertine project in general, but instead to oppose a specific component of the development. I specifically object to the proposed 36 foot high, 60-foot-wide elevated roadway to be built on Avenue 62 that is to serve as the main entrance to the Travertine development. This elevated freeway like ramp roadway hovering 36feet in the air, will be built in close proximity to the existing Trilogy residential development. The Developer claims there will be no significant impact to Trilogy residents... but that simply, is NOT a true statement! Initially during the first phase With over 6,000 cars, trucks, motorcycles, and construction vehicles traveling over the roadway daily, the impact to Trilogy residents in terms of noise, air pollution, lights and aesthetics will be severe, and will only get worse, as future phases are built out! By comparison, currently, Avenue 62 south of the Trilogy development serves as a "dead-end" road with a single destination point of the Trilogy maintenance yard at the end of the road that closes daily at 4:45 p.m. Based on an actual traffic count study completed this past Friday August 2" d, there were only 150 vehicles that drove down the road and back to Monroe all day long. There is zero noise and traffic at nighttime. 1 Since the elevated roadway needs to start 600 feet down Avenue 62, in order to have a slope that is reasonable for trucks, and construction vehicles, the elevated roadway will bring cars and trucks above the current six -foot -high wall surrounding Trilogy, as traffic travels upward to the 36-foot height. The road noise from straining engines from trucks, automobiles and motorcycles accelerating up the hill all day and during the night will be a major disruption to the senior residents living in close proximity adjacent to this new elevated roadway. This type of elevated roadway is completely inconsistent with the surrounding residential Trilogy neighborhood. In fact, nothing like this exists in any residential area anywhere in the Coachella Valley. This type of elevated roadway does not belong in this location. It will forever change the character of the area; it will permanently mar the unobstructed view of the majestic mountains and will permanently and negatively impact residents in the residential community of Trilogy and will definitely decrease property values. This elevated roadway violates many of the 2035 La Quinta General Plan goals and objectives. The La Quinta General Plan is designed specifically to prevent this very situation from happening! The General Plan is specifically designed to preserve and protect the quality of life for La Quinta residents. It's goals, policies and programs are those of the people of La Quinta, and ...are not intended to facilitate the agenda of any outside group, entity, or developer! The proposed Travertine Avenue 62 elevated roadway • is NOT consistent with the General Plan • it does NOT uphold the rights and needs of the surrounding property owners • it is NOT consistent with neighboring developments • It will create excessive noise, traffic, greenhouse gas and vehicle pollution emissions adjacent to a 55+ community • It is detrimental to public health and general welfare of the surrounding community • and therefore, is NOT compatible with General Plan land use goals. Yet, considering all of this, the developer insists, that this proposed elevated roadway will have less than significant impact on the surrounding neighborhood! So, 1 must ask, how many of the surrounding neighborhood communities have a 36-foot elevated roadway with 6,000 vehicles a day right next to them, illuminated all night long with headlights glaring into the neighborhood? Answer: NONE! I ask you City Leaders, should this type of roadway be placed next to a quiet residential neighborhood? ...NO! As City leaders, if you cannot adhere to the city of La Quinta General Plan, a plan designed to protect La Quinta residents from inappropriate development adjacent to their homes, ...then who will? City leaders, if you cannot recognize that the elevated roadway does NOT resemble surrounding roadways in the adjacent neighborhoods in any way, and does not belong in this location, ...then who will? The benefits of the project do not outweigh the significant and numerous environmental and neighborhood impacts In conclusion, I ask you Mayor Evans and City leaders to listen to, and respect the will of your constituents, who elected you to serve their needs, and protect their interests...... not the interests of outside developers. Just tell the developers the overhead roadway at Avenue 62 must be eliminated from their plan... and they must move the entrance to the Jefferson Street extension! Thank you! Bob Lasser 81401 Golden Poppy Way La Quinta, CA 92253 3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 6, 2024 - HANDOUT BY RESIDENT MARK REIDER & PRESIDENT OF THE BOARD AT TRILOGY AT LA QUINTA PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - TRAVERTINE PROJECT TRAVERTINE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MEETING PRESENTATION Mark Reider - TLQMA August 6, 2024 Mayor Evans, Council Members. Good afternoon. My name is Mark Reider, and I live at 81530 Monarch Court in Trilogy. I am speaking today in my role as President of the Board of the Trilogy at La Quinta homeowners association, and I would like to thank my fellow Board member for donating his time to me. My comments reflect the consensus of the Board of Directors, and we believe, the vast majority of Trilogy homeowners, many of whom are here tonight to protest the current plan for accessing the Travertine development. Our Board of Directors has traditionally not addressed proposed developments that only affect areas outside our community. However, as currently proposed, the Travertine Project does impact The Trilogy at La Quinta community consisting of 1238 homes and over 2,000 of the City's constituents. With guidance from our legal counsel, we are here to voice our strong opposition to the current development plan for extending Avenue 62 over the berm as the primary access and entry road into Travertine. In our view, our community would be severely impacted by the noise and visual pollution of the proposed roadway— conditions we believe are not adequately addressed in the Environmental Impact Review. The current plan calls for TWO bridges to be built directly adjacent to our community: • One as the main entrance to Travertine from Avenue 62, which borders the south end of our community, • And a second as an emergency access road at Madison at our west border. The bridge and ramped roadway on Avenue 62 would be massive in scale. As a comparison, consider the bridge being built over the stormwater channel at Dunes Palm Road. That bridge is 480-feet long and 86 feet wide. The bridge and elevated roadway on Avenue 62 behind our community would be 600 feet long— and that's just on our side of the berm — and 60 feet wide. As for height, there is no comparison. The Dunes Palm bridge is only 10 feet above the stormwater channel. The proposed bridge behind Trilogy would have to clear the berm, which is 30 feet high. And it must clear the top of the berm by at least 6 feet. Which means that cars, trucks, and construction rigs up to 15 feet high will be traveling over a 36-foot-high bridge with a solid retaining wall on both sides of the roadway. Those vehicles will be seen and heard by a large segment of our 55+ community at all hours of the day and night. Which brings us to the environmental assessment. The modeling in the EIR says there are currently an average of 600 vehicles per day on Avenue 62 between Monroe and the berm. We question if that is possible when that dead- end road is used only for Trilogy's maintenance workers and the occasional stray vehicle. The draft report also predicts there will be 13,000 vehicles, on average, traveling on that bridge each day when Travertine is completed. The report further states that nearly ha if of that traffic volume will occur between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. That is an extraordinary amount of traffic. The EIR states that the traffic noise on Avenue 62 will nearly double, but will remain within exterior noise standards. However, the same report states that traffic volumes will increase by 2000%, leading us to question the report's conclusion. And, as you know, all traffic and noise data are subject to error due to the accuracy and relevance of the assumptions that are used, which can vary from actual conditions on the ground. For example, the standard used in these models minimizes the impact of noises such as a horn honking or the sound of a large fully loaded construction truck accelerating up a hill or the sound of large trucks as they decelerate and brake coming down a hill. And in this case, it would be a hill with a 36-foot increase or decrease in elevation with a potentially significant grade. Along with our concerns about the accuracy of the noise data, the environmental report does not address the impact of lights. With an estimated 6,000 vehicles using that bridge at night, the impact on our community would be considerable from vehicle headlights, not to mention the lighting on the bridge itself. The EIR does not address that impact whatsoever. Additionally, there are other governmental agencies that must consider and approve this project; therefore, we ask the city to delay or postpone any final decision until all relevant agencies and organizations have weighed in on this project. I want to conclude by pointing out that there is an alternative that would reduce the impact to our community and, frankly, provide easier access to Travertine for its residents and workers. That is to make Jefferson the primary road in and out of the development. This alternative, or Alternative #1 in the report, makes much more sense for several reasons: The traffic pattern is more logical than using Avenue 62. By using Jefferson, traffic coming from the west or north would flow down Madison, turn right onto Avenue 58, then left onto an extension of Jefferson. That approach would provide a more appealing and scenic entrance into Travertine. • Whereas, using Avenue 62 would require traffic to flow down Madison, turn left at Avenue 60, then right onto Monroe, then right again at 62 - an approach that requires motorists to circumnavigate Trilogy to enter Travertine from the East while passing by and impacting over 150 homes in Trilogy along the way on Avenues 60 and 62 as well as on Monroe. • More importantly, using Jefferson would eliminate the need to build up to a 36-foot- high roadway with retaining walls over the berm. We understand from comments made by the Landowner's representative that the Jefferson alternative is not favored because it is more costly than Avenue 62 and they would need to get right-of-way approval from other landowners. In our opinion, a developer's cost of a project should not be a consideration when making a land -use decision. It should be what's in the best interest of the entire La Quinta community— and using Avenue 62 appears to us to simply be the path of least resistance for the developer. We respectfully ask the City Council to do what is in the best interest for La Quinta. At a minimum, that would mean conducting a more realistic noise study and addressing the issue of light pollution. We also ask that there be a more detailed comparison of using Jefferson versus Avenue 62 as the main entry to Travertine. We believe that going the extra mile will lead you to conclude that Avenue 62 is not the right Long-term solution for the future residents of Travertine, the current residents of Trilogy, and the city as a whole. Thank you for your time. POWER POINTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 61202 4 City Council Regular Meeting August 6, 2024 7 • �' ' L'AL1 S ���Y City Council Regular Meeting August 6, 2024 PUBLIC COMMENT - MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA 8 2 City Council Regular Meeting August 6, 2024 CLOSED SESSION IN PROGRESS 7� z City Council Regular Meeting August 6, 2024 PUBLIC COMMENT - MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA City Council Meeting August 6, 2024 P1 -Proclamation Recognizing Katherine Vogts CALUOR1IA EL. -- a .® City Council Meeting August 6, 2024 131 — 2022/23 Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) Audit Summary ✓ Conducted virtually by Eide Bailly LLP, Certified Public Accountants from October 2023 — June 2024 ✓ Reviewed nearly 1,000 documents & conducted interviews ✓ Issued a clean audit opinion — most favorable conclusion ✓ All new financial regulatory requirements have been implemented ✓ ACFR meets the GFOA's Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements and has been submitted for another certification ✓ Auditor comments regarding the City shall be provided tonight Major Events LIWA Financial Statements Summaries & Charts ACFR Content Statement of Net Position Category I Amount TOTAL 1 $858,597,320 Indicators of a City's fiscal health include: ✓ Balanced General Fund budget ✓ Strong General Fund reserve fund ✓ Making required pension contributions on time ✓ Public service levels meet or exceed standards of the community August 6, 2024 11 12 Long -Term Debt Major Infrastructure Investments Dune Palms Bridge La Quinta Avenue 53 & Improvements Landscape Jefferson Renovation Roundabout $4,050,000 $2,923,000 $2,758,000 Citywide Striping Highway 111 Refresh Corridor Area Plan Design $295,000 $285,000 Fiscal Sustainability M Adopted a balanced 2023/24 budget P Continue to address long-term liabilities A Mixture of housing and commercial developments are under construction � Long-term vision and planning are a priority Eide Bailly Auditor Comments August 6, 2024 EideBailly, CPAs & BUSINESS ADVISORS CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA Independent Auditor's Communication to those Charged with Governance (AU-C 260) for the fiscal year June 30, 2023 August 6, 2024 17 AUDITOR'S REQUIRED COMMUNICATION (AU-C 260) Scope of Work Results (June 30, 2023) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Unmodified opinion Federal Awards Report in Accordance with the Uniform Guidance (Single Audit Report) 18 a August 6, 2024 PROFESSIONAL STANDARDS Form and express an opinion about whether the financial statements that have been prepared by management with your oversight are presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our responsibility is to plan and perform our audit to obtain reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We considered internal control over financial reporting. Such considerations were solely for the purpose of determining our audit procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such internal control. • Our responsibility, as it relates to the audit of the City's major federal program compliance, is to express an opinion on compliance of the City's major federal program based on our audit of the types of compliance requirements as described in the OMB Compliance Supplement. 19 AUDITOR'S REQUIRED COMMUNICATION (AU-C 260) Significant Accounting Policies The City's significant accounting policies are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. As described in Note 1, the City changed accounting policies related to accounting for the provisions of Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB) Statement No. 96, Subscription -Based Information Technology Agreements (SBITAs). Significant Accounting Estimates Amounts related to the net pension liability, deferred inflows and outflows of resources and disclosures were based on actuarial valuations and a proportionate share of the CalPERS collective net pension liability. Financial Statement Disclosures The disclosure of the City's defined benefit pension plans, net pension liability and related deferred inflows of resources and deferred outflows of resources in Note 9 to the financial statements. As disclosed in Note 9, a 1% increase or decrease in the discount rate has a significant effect on the City's net pension liability. The disclosure of the City's net OPEB liability and related deferred inflows of resources and deferred outflow of resources in Note 11 to the financial statements. As disclosed in Note 11, a 1% increase or decrease in the discount rate or healthcare cost trend rate has a significant effect on the City's net OPEB liability. oft, 10 August 6, 2024 AUDITOR'S REQUIRED COMMUNICATION (AU-C 260) Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit None noted Uncorrected and Corrected Misstatements There were no uncorrected misstatements identified as a result of our audit procedures. In our letter to those charged with governance, date July 19, 2024, we have identified misstatements that were brought to the attention of management and corrected. Disagreements with Management None noted Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants None noted 21 AUDITOR'S REQUIRED COMMUNICATION (AU-C 260) Other Significant Matters, Findings or Issues Financial Statement Audit Independent Auditor's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements Performed in Accordance with Government Auditing Standards Financial Statement Finding No. 2023-001 — Reporting and Closing - Material Weakness Financial Statement Finding No. 2023-002 — Schedule of Expenditures of Federal Awards (SEFA) Preparation — Material Weakness 22 11 August 6, 2024 p�> 23 24 QUESTIONS? 12 - CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting August 6, 2024 PH1 - Public Nuisance Abatement on Tax Roll c AL-i , Background • Code Compliance pursues public nuisance cases to maintain public safety and quality of life. • Reasons for Lot Abatements: — Fire hazard conditions (dense dry bush). — Unsightly conditions (abandoned appliances, furniture, construction debris, etc.) — Violation of LQMC 11.72.030 — Public nuisances declared. Steps • Public nuisance is declared: notification is posted at the site and sent to the owner via regular and certified mail. • If owner fails to abate property within a reasonable time, then the City bids the job, and hires a contractor to abate the property. • City may recover cost associated with the abatement by placing an abatement assessment on Property Tax Roll Abated Properties Approve placement of public nuisance abatement assessments on 2024/25 Property Tax Roll J a August 6, 2024 31 32 16 Background • Travertine Specific Plan adopted 1995 — 909 acres — 2,300 residential units — 10 acres of commercial uses — 500-room resort hotel — 36-hole golf course, tennis club, private recreation — 378 acres of open space Proposal • Modify project master plan — 855 acres — 1,200 residential units ranging in size from large lot estates to small lot attached — 38-acre spa/hotel with 100 villas and associated amenities — 46-acre resort area with golf academy, clubhouse, and banquet restaurant — Recreational open space with parks and public trails — Natural open space for conservation Entitlements • General Plan Amendment • Zone Change • Specific Plan • Tentative Tract Map • Development Agreement • Environmental Impact Report General Plan Amendment • Land Use Map: — Modify land uses per proposed specific plan • Circulation Plan: — Realign Jefferson Street alignment Within and north of Travertine site — Remove Madison Street alignment • For use as Emergency Vehicle Access only August 6, 2024 Existing General Plan Vil O- k•� 4rwrai ka�. 4.re•� nw C r.0 Me•Ow% 4m Wn 4m Wn Nrd,m�H�14:L l .qa u5 Cpn $x[ RovNao, 3EL4 55! Proposed General Plan meal PlanOnl�yatlon Ann LMh 14m• 4.Jh IAY. ueKM ReS:dentlN' 3B7.7 1575• 31" 15B g7.dIVn�Ml�tl gtdOmlFal yl-a — wa 4-7 wSti ComR,erciY 309 64.9 —54--PKr am 35S.1 45.9 0 a•.^51--N.I,mk ild 301.i ,naiar Lmrt,aity Fau7ilm S.1 201 350 farm 90.4 7" mu 1200 i 19 Roadways • Avenue 62 and Jefferson St — Both proposed as access to the project — Modified Secondary arterials — Planned for since 1995 • Madison St — Downgrades from Modified Secondary Arterial to Emergency Access General Plan Build Out • General Plan estimates build out for community — Based on land uses set in General Plan • Traffic models based on that estimate August 6, 2024 41 Existing Zoning 42 Proposed Zoning PA"W I RMN A"Il ,.Whb, C-0 I-t aA.9 HT-1 ass'. Lmo d `�V 21 Specific Plan • Reorganize current land uses • Reduce intensity of the project • Prescribe permitted uses including short term vacation rentals • Incorporate design guidelines and standards • Proposed Specific Plan would repeal and replace the current Specific Plan Tentative Tract Map • 38 lots for residential and commercial uses • 73 open space lots • Subsequent tract maps required • Easements required to access NAP parcel and parcels west of the project in Section 5 August 6, 2024 Not a Part (NAP) Section 5 Parcels 26. --The applicant shall provWeat6ss m A�6 rs ParcOI &mbbr•7A&110-005 as shown on Toni auvr Trw-Map37347.1 27. — The applos.r-doll•pr ide acc".- o proponies-vmhin 5edion•3 af•Township•7- $pWh. Nor" 7Eaetax0R 0on7eera1i� Tram fvpp V397antl•shaegrenl c saesemem r,he private mean wdiin dw Travarbe Developmanrj EIR 46 _ _ rs rm ar prance _ _ r Section 5 Parcels !r 51. r • 11 lryl I r I it it w *+R �s tw •11 I 23 Development Agreement • Identifies public facilities and improvements tied to the development of the project • Provides for the establishment of Community Facilities District(s) • Includes provisions relating to — Transfers and assignments to subsequent developers and property owners — Defaults and remedies — Mortgage/private financing ability by secured real property interests • Includes Schedule of Performance based on Phasing Plan State Housing Law Compliance • Senate Bill 330 contains regulations regarding housing development projects — Cities generally are not allowed to downzone —Also requires compliance with CEQA • Proposed project implements mitigation measures necessary to comply with CEQA Environmental Analysis • Draft EIR prepared • Most environmental impacts reduced to less than significant levels with mitigation incorporated • Air Quality, Greenhouse Gases and Transportation (Vehicle Miles Traveled) remain significant • Statement of Overriding Considerations required — Provided in EIR Resolution Environmental Analysis • Draft EIR public review — October 27 through December 11, 2023 — Comments received from various public agencies and residents regarding air quality, noise, aesthetics, geology, land use, housing, and traffic impacts Environmental Analysis • Final E I R prepared — Incorporates responses to comments received, errata/revisions section and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program — Distributed July 26 Planning Commission • Meetings on May 28 and June 25 • Concerns with noise, aesthetics and traffic associated with Ave 62 extension over Dike 4 • Draft E I R found that noise and aesthetic impacts are less than significant WWI �,. "Nt Planning Commission • Avenue 62 and Jefferson St — Both proposed as access to the project • Required for project build out — Modified Secondary arterials in existing General Plan — Planned for since 1995 • Applicant has added a patterned masonry wall along the sides of the Ave 62 crossing instead of guardrails — Extends up to 42 inches in height — Help block the views of automobiles traveling along the roadway CAL111( RNIA a August 6, 2024 t' 1Y . .. •ice v,a} �- - - _ _ - - -' `�•�`�.. �• _ =:t. _ _ - � ,�` ��-_��''_y�+_�� 5.-"'� - _ . �- �i�. .- _.__ - - - '�'-_ - - - __ __ - -tsar �'.y •+;Y--���. '� --_ � s .. � - - _ - •-�.=�'_="y-'4`_�-- - - - - _ --;y.ry,H -� "�=:�-'._ -• - - - _ _ fix,.=-__ - -_• - - -� � .;r, _ —ems; - - . 4r��- 6V The Hofmann Family Legacy Kenneth H. Hofmann H 0 F M A N N LAND DEVELOPMENT C O M P A N Y • A visionary and philanthropist devoted to youth education and conservation • In 1948, he began his career in contracting and development as a plastering contractor. He began building homes in 1951. In 1957, he formed The Hofmann Company and since that time has built over 30,000 homes and apartments, and over $150 million in commercial and industrial properties. • Two-time President and member of the Board of Directors of the Building Industry Association. He is also a member of the National Association of Home Builders. • An active fund raiser for several local causes including Ducks Unlimited, California Waterfowl Association, the Regional Theater for the Arts in Walnut Creek, and the Mount Diablo Medical Center. • An avid sportsman who enjoys flying, golf, hunting and fishing. He was married for 60 years to the former Jean England and they have two daughters. The Hofmann's own homes in northern California and La Quinta. 56 August 6, 2024 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS, 1988 .il•:::li.l� � I.R'.l 2318 PIVETR LE4MIIIRf 'i001 TENTATIVETRFGT YAP INITWTE6 ?nay V8FYY3 &OLCGT ENVIROHd ENTA, a BSE8�'AENT IMP+M'r REPPRT 14=14^4 ® �. HYOROLOOV RE" 0..�_� 19 LAND 113E PLAN 4 low y QVINTA ANNEXES TNAVE@TINE 57 Nos MD G45180VAMN LANDSCME ARCHITECTURE BOUNOA RIGID TRAVERTINE & GREEN, 1995 rw MEYER •'1 + +►r :1 ■ �• GREEN •terLT;.:�'s - �.x.J - ■� �►, r' TRAVERT[NE r � r �� �� ` `� ; — -- — • +�� � �. +'ill. 4 Lir 58 29 August 6, 2024 APPROVED PLAN, 1995 sumMarer {PI9R �"w use 1— U—ity Rmidential MedEum D—ftr Resld-C.1 rMf IourFe T0.4 CIO Maintananca PROJECTACREAGE 900ACRES _ 4'"'j Rewd/Nmoi t Cammerdok Ra.a DWELLING UNITS 2,300 D.U. I`s COMMERCIAL 10ACRES v 1' I, F RESORT/HOTEL 500 KEYS _ GOLF (2) - 18 HOLE REGULATION GOLF COURSES "� > 400 ACRES NATURAL OPEN SPACE ----- TRAFFIC GENERATED 28,000 ADT 59 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT, 2006 TNVIIJ No Bureau of Land Management Environmental Assessment FANumber C'A-661 W-28 • 1, —,01Pr/maut a+rnc lmI lm au6a u..•.r ..YU Mb140I!✓lairr e vreoHxa:l.*r�wr�v�rr ru.euwzwua..era. ape urraca rncrRn�ar rrr� nuna+rr�mw¢r.Hwna+sv.•^.a::� u 011arrA, V CAM FIF aWF6 CX.k-.W7 .n—Fmg: rwa awml5—w-p WVr K0 Orr KY 6aw.a., A—P0 D-WlM -WA Rows p.G 022&,M WRa lS Y,.RWO KRae 1301, — Pb.— A- 9—co,I drrort�,++.+y.r im L,saw ^., ay. Eel.. �� b Tu,wy OdgrMen w.�nw��.cua■,crme: 7 f�. e.. a•nu�e ueF W arid`n 'aT + ea 6n rr�l+l?o M1w � W� M.�•rr4 V59��anndl�Ya�1w 30 August 6, 2024 MADISON ST. APPROVED CONST. DWGS "4IN THE CITI OF LA QWNTA 1 MAOISON STREET IMPROVENMNT PLANS %PECIFICMAN 94-026 (1-4-1-FlUM ICONDMOM TRAVERTINE DUVELOPMENT J- -tjl map mmw ;jz- Zk== jLX:W L i I L: CO. I MADISON STREET COMPUTER MODEL z14 N , IM 31 August 6, 2024 HOW BIG IS TOO BIG? HOW SMALL IS TOO SMALL? 63 wip Umrgrmivry a.>.v11i—oaee911Mii-75s�ryvry�, $679,900 3 3 1,641 5Q 130 Kaw Cm. La 4umm. CA 92253 beds ha[hs sqh i3-,KA311— / dlr.... R.—kl 64 >•x. sic•. ncee anse li em Pricy T14QG24 liseed[er sale S679.9M-87-9% Sam sdo AX.7.7% 53i7�sglt 7135i2018 Pendin5 sale SA39.000 11G9's4rt 6i1F2b75 "--- Laced Soy sale S439.009-4.4% *Zs&slc 31�r29�E Lisnng-emored sa59.0m t�ftqk 32 August 6, 2024 65 [:i: MODIFIED ROADS i i 4 i � f Ave 54_ I I�Ga � west PGA oiest i— — — Airport Rive. I Palms IT � — — i Golf I Club Wth Ave.— - I ;S I Avo 6Q C" Boundary � — Pio BGl 1 vu ary 111 • {{II A�82 l iiiil Leg I 62ntl Ave — � i ! 4 Avo 54 PGA West PGA West Airport Rlyd. Palms — — — — Gol Club a4 Boundary L — L ,AVe 60 — — --� f i era CC1 .� Baundory A_e 62 i -----Existing I t N L--— J I .. .. Proposed L— � I N Existing - Master Plan Proposed • Madison, Jefferson and Avenue 62 . Removal of Madison south of Avenue 60 Modified Secondary Highway • Realignment of Jefferson Street 33 August 6, 2024 ZONING PLAN wrnanaRr COLQR fAWb 11># tm De lty Residential Medium D—ity Rsidential GO Cc— Mairdrnanw _ Trnnis CIO, Rosorsl Natal y �-[ernmerclal (Roadway EXISTING 67 7 wrewutr I CR+�R �1.�INA LaE low 0en5lty Residential l Medium cm sity Reslden[lal 71 yourist Commercial Ovsm Svxr 1 _ .ram^ _#Si+yinC�er Rvadw COMPARISON TABLE LAND USE 1997 SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT ACREAGE 900 ACRES DWELLING UNITS 2,300 D.U. COMMERCIAL 10 ACRES RESORT/HOTEL 500 KEYS (2) - IS HOLE REGULATION GOLF GOLF COURSES 400 ACRES NATURAL OPEN SPACE ----- TRAFFIC GENERATED 28,000 ADT [.? J PROPOSED SP AMENDMENT % CHANGE 855 ACRES ---- 1,200 D.U. 48 % LESS - 100 % LESS 100 KEYS 80 % LESS GOLF TRAINING FACILITY 46 ACRES 91 % LESS 301 ACRES 100 % MORE 11,000 ADT 60 % LESS 34 August 6, 2024 SITE PLAN., 2024 A. I 69 ACCESS. All, LF �kp 14 J 70 35 August 6, 2024 CIRCULATION 71 PHASING � I Qy�...`. . PHASE I PHASE? 72 36 August 6, 2024 Ave 62 - Our Project Begins E rL004UPE CREEK �I)WatSION DIXE8 —7 L -4 -ME 1 Z�E 21 'mom,..,. I Sewer Water Storm Drain 73 2040 ROADWAY CAPACITIES -@�E4 AVENUE 59 MMTT-CMWW"0MMC=,, 57KET F-MNSIO" (WA OPIM 3) AMUME MLVYRAFFK JA" 14 1. J. 'A AVENUE 50 22y— 24 .......... ..... AVENUE R 0- 13 SITE 74 37 August 6, 2024 2040 Roadway Capacities TABLE 7-4: ROADWAY VOLUMEICAPACITY ANALYSI5 FOR 2040 WITHOUT MADISON STREET EXTENSION (GPA OPTION 1) Road" 9ft-9 Roadway Designation Through Travel Lanes' capac-Ay2 A0T3 volume/ cope ty patio West of Madison Street Secondary 4 28,000 12,500 0.45 Avenue58 West of Monroe Street Secondary 4 28,000 14,0d0 0.50 West ofJackson$treet Secondary 4 28,000 19,0W o.6S Madison St. South ofAvenue55 Primary 4 42,600 34,000 0.80 6ftAvenue West of Jackson Street Primary 4 42,600 15,0W 0.35 West of Monroe Street Modified Secondary 2 19,000 13,000 0.68 Avenue 62 West of Jackson Street Secondary 4 28,000 19,0W 0.68 South of Avenue 60 Secondary 4 28,000 25,000 0.89 Monroe St. South ofAvenueSS Primary 4 4 42,600 27,000 0.63 0.61 5outh of Avenue 56 Primary 42,600 26,000 Jackson St. So u th of Air no rt Bou levard Primary 4 1 42,600 29,000 0.68 11 - Existing number of lanes;A= City of La QNlnta General Plan Buildout number of lanes Source: City of La Quinta Engineering Bul letin M06-13 {July 2015j SOLO = Est;mated to exceed threshold daily capacd y va lues and subject to funh or evaluation of peak hour performance at key i ntersedi ons along these —J tOs- Average Daily Traffic (ADTI expressed in vefiic ley per day, 75 RESORT r [• -- -- (ARALMOCN•CAIN 1y 4 NORT11 ENTRY I RESORT %,[] 11ks r 100 KEYS 1 i I 76 RESORT M A I N MM PI EX SPA �1 ;: ILLNESS CENTER 1 Im August 6, 2024 GOLF TRAINING c N L: F 6 2 —'r PAIL STAGJ NG AREA DRIVIW RANGE A LINQUE1 FALILII-YA-DL%rE[IDINGC-,AVLIEN OL: It HOLE PRACTICE E FAC I Lil Y & TOURIST SERVING COMMERCIAL WITH 0LrACADE.AY SHORT TERM VACATION RENTAL, 77 RECREATION CENTERS 78 39 August 6, 2024 TRAILS NW A EWM 79 40 August 6, 2024 POSITIVES Consider a Resolution to recommend City Council certify an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (EA2017-0008. SCH# 2018011023) for the Travertine Project and direct staff to prepare Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations. 7-0 Approval Consider a Resolution to recommend City Council approve General Plan Amendment 2017-0002, Zone Change 2017-0002, Specific Plan 2017-0004, Tentative Tract Map 2017-0008 (TTM 37387), and Development Agreement 2021-0001. 6-1 Approval "There are very significant environmental challenges that the opplkant has addressed." - Commissioner Tyerman "What u tremendous effort from the applicant's team to put together this really incredible project in south La '. Quinta. Years in the making. 5o much effort has been put into it and the persistence—oli that resonates especially with the team of experts. 1 personally have full faith in the EIR that was presented." - Commissioner INieto "I don't find any fats! flaws in the DR."- Commissioner Caldwell "We love the project."— Alena Callimanis ' 81 PROJECT BENEFITS • Majority contributor to IID Improvements for power, • Construction of 2 major circulation elements in the GP Master Plan of Circulation. (Jefferson Street and Ave 62). • Contributions to Public Safety and other public services costs with mitigation fees. ■ Creation of a plan for moderate housing types envisioned by the General Plan. Construction of 2 water tanks that will serve 2 pressures zones with additional capacity for CVWD. ■ Major trails and open space contribution. • Total acres of valley floor developed: 926 ac. in 2005, 554 ac. in 2022 ■ Total acres contributed to conservation: 301.2 ac. (2022) + 135 ac. (2005) 436.2 ac. • Total dollars committed to conservation: $2.6m (Bo) + $500k (CVMSHCP Fees) = $3.1m EN 41 August 6, 2024 IN] FAiR SNAiE - - i suns nnnr. wrnlMwlrtin Nesvl � I 6ur+nA � Axdolu.l+ — -- �_.._ rI � CaAI SAIN�Y.ARESCIR!YF4{' � kFFFR1CW SIflEF.' = AE 9A" W Ma�lrnln IW OF AECNFRGE�.�- FC)%F15 IHCM4A6F S Ga40nLUPE E n1' . 8,5,NSME ri enen lNmf�E' .AVENI.E of _-- A9LVlIOh.a _ • �Pt?- ON SEAEET WREI'•tl AGEI. �I - ' OPEN 5114CE MWI�'I^' Tn 1.1A58 PLS5 83 GENERAL PLAN & SPHERE OF INFLUENCE General Plan r�marmc u.�e um sae - No_ r A �. 84 AND 5 NERE OF In FLUENC E AREA 42 August 6, 2024 Travertine A SOCIALLY RESPONSIBLE PROJECT E31 43 August 6, 2024 v At 41 `. •-�- -�'�■sue--K+► .�,.µyRI` 4 ���,, tit. , z•,�,-, I - I 4 Am lip Eft 44 •- ;n JEW. — —rr •...rti.� .'' ' LA 5 August 6, 2024 AESTHETICS DO DN 20