Appendix A - Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas & Energy Impact StudyTroutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact
Study
City of La Quinta, CA
Prepared for:
Thomas Strand
The Altum Group
72140 Magnesia Falls, Suite 1
Rancho Mirage, CA 92270
Prepared by:
MD Acoustics, LLC
Mike Dickerson, INCE; Tyler Klassen
1197 Los Angeles Ave, Ste C-256
Simi Valley, CA 93065
Date: 12/30/2021
ACOUSTICS
Sound Solutions for Planning and Design
Noise Study Reports I Vibration Studies I Air Quality I Greenhouse Gas I Health Risk Assessments
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 Introduction..........................................................................................................................1
1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives 1
1.2 Project Summary 1
1.2.1 Site Location 1
1.2.2 Project Description
1.2.3 Sensitive Receptors
1.3 Executive Summary of Findings and Mitigation Measures
1
2
2
2.0 Regulatory Framework and Background.................................................................................6
2.1 Air Quality Regulatory Setting 6
2.1.1 National and State 6
2.1.2 South Coast Air Quality Management District 8
2.1.3 Local 10
2.2
Greenhouse Gas Regulatory Setting
14
2.2.1 International
14
2.2.2 National
14
2.2.3 California
16
2.2.4 South Coast Air Quality Management District
24
2.2.5 Local
25
3.0 Setting
.................................................................................................................................27
3.1
Existing Physical Setting
27
3.1.1 Local Climate and Meteorology
27
3.1.2 Local Air Quality
28
3.1.3 Attainment Status
30
3.2
Greenhouse Gases
32
4.0 Modeling
Parameters and Assumptions...............................................................................34
4.1
Construction
34
4.2
Operations
35
4.3
Localized Construction Analysis
35
4.4
Localized Operational Analysis
36
5.0 Thresholds of Significance....................................................................................................37
5.1
Air Quality Thresholds of Significance
37
5.1.1 CEQA Guidelines for Air Quality
37
5.1.2 Regional Significance Thresholds for Construction Emissions
37
5.1.3 Regional Significance Thresholds for Operational Emissions
38
5.1.4 Thresholds for Localized Significance
38
5.2
Greenhouse Gas Thresholds of Significance
38
5.2.1 CEQA Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas
38
5.3
Toxic Air Contaminants
39
6.0 Air Quality Emissions Impact................................................................................................40
MD Acoustics, LLC ii
JN: 07412137 Report
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
6.1
Construction Air Quality Emissions Impact
40
6.1.1 Regional Construction Emissions
40
6.1.2 Localized Construction Emissions
41
6.1.3 Construction -Related Human Health Impacts
41
6.1.4 Odors
41
6.1.5 Construction -Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impact
42
6.2
Operational Air Quality Emissions Impact
42
6.2.1 Regional Operational Emissions
42
6.2.2 Localized Operational Emissions
43
6.2.3 Operations -Related Human Health Impacts
44
6.3
CO Hot Spot Emissions
44
6.4
Cumulative Regional Air Quality Impacts
45
6.5
Air Quality Compliance
45
7.0 Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis..........................................................................................47
7.1
Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact
47
7.2
Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact
47
7.3
Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency
48
8.0 Energy Analysis....................................................................................................................50
8.1
Construction Energy Demand
50
8.1.1 Construction Equipment Electricity Usage Estimates
50
8.1.2 Construction Equipment Fuel Estimates
51
8.1.3 Construction Worker Fuel Estimates
51
8.1.4 Construction Vendor/Hauling Fuel Estimates
52
8.1.5 Construction Energy Efficiency/Conservation Measures
53
8.2
Operational Energy Demand
54
8.2.1 Transportation Fuel Consumption
54
8.2.2 Facility Energy Demands (Electricity and Natural Gas)
55
8.3
Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Plan Consistency
55
9.0 References...........................................................................................................................57
MD Acoustics, LLC iii
JN: 07412137 Report
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A:
CalEEMod Daily Emission Output
Appendix B:
CalEEMod Annual Emission Output
Appendix C:
EMFAC2017 Output
LIST OF EXHIBITS
ExhibitA...........................................................................................................................................4
Location Map 4
ExhibitB...........................................................................................................................................5
Site Plan 5
LIST OF TABLES
Table1: Land Use Summary........................................................................................................................ 1
Table 2: Ambient Air Quality Standards..................................................................................................... 7
Table 3: Meteorological Summary............................................................................................................ 28
Table 4: Local Area Air Quality Levels from Palm Springs Air Monitoring Station' .................................. 29
Table 5: Coachella Valley Portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status ................................... 31
Table 6: Description of Greenhouse Gases............................................................................................... 33
Table 7: Construction Equipment Assumptions'...................................................................................... 36
Table 8: Regional Significance - Construction Emissions (pounds/day)................................................... 40
Table 9: Localized Significance — Construction......................................................................................... 41
Table 10: Regional Significance - Unmitigated Operational Emissions (lbs/day)..................................... 43
Table 11: Localized Significance — Unmitigated Operational Emissions ................................................... 43
Table 12: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions................................................................................. 47
Table 13: Opening Year Unmitigated Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions.................................48
Table 14: Project Construction Power Cost and Electricity Usage........................................................... 50
Table 15: Construction Equipment Fuel Consumption Estimates............................................................ 51
Table 16: Construction Worker Fuel Consumption Estimates................................................................. 52
Table 17: Construction Vendor Fuel Consumption Estimates (MHD Trucks)' ......................................... 53
Table 18: Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption Estimates (HHD Trucks)' .......................................... 53
MD Acoustics, LLC iv
JN: 07412137 Report
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table 19: Estimated Vehicle Operations Fuel Consumption.................................................................... 54
Table 20: Project Unmitigated Annual Operational Energy Demand Summary' ..................................... 55
MD Acoustics, LLC
JN: 07412137 Report
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA TABLE OF CONTENTS
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
AQMP
Air Quality Management Plan
CAAQS
California Ambient Air Quality Standards
CARB
California Air Resources Board
CEQA
California Environmental Quality Act
CFCs
Chlorofluorocarbons
CH4
Methane
CNG
Compressed natural gas
CO
Carbon monoxide
CO2
Carbon dioxide
CO2e
Carbon dioxide equivalent
DPM
Diesel particulate matter
GHG
Greenhouse gas
HFCs
Hydrofluorocarbons
LST
Localized Significant Thresholds
MTCO2e
Metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
MMTCO2e
Million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent
NAAQS
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
NOx
Nitrogen Oxides
NO2
Nitrogen dioxide
N20
Nitrous oxide
03
Ozone
PFCs
Perfluorocarbons
PM
Particle matter
PM10
Particles that are less than 10 micrometers in diameter
PM2.5
Particles that are less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter
PMI
Point of maximum impact
PPM
Parts per million
PPB
Parts per billion
RTIP
Regional Transportation Improvement Plan
RTP
Regional Transportation Plan
SCAQMD
South Coast Air Quality Management District
SF6
Sulfur hexafluoride
SIP
State Implementation Plan
Sox
Sulfur Oxides
SRA
Source/Receptor Area
SSAB
Salton Sea Air Basin
TAC
Toxic air contaminants
VOC
Volatile organic compounds
WRCC
Western Regional Climate Center
MD Acoustics, LLC Vi
JN: 07412137 Report
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Introduction
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives
This air quality and greenhouse gas (GHG) analysis was prepared to evaluate whether the estimated
criteria pollutants and GHG emissions generated from the project would cause a significant impact to
the air resources in the project area. This assessment was conducted within the context of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq.).
The assessment is consistent with the methodology and emission factors endorsed by South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD), California Air Resource Board (CARB), and the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA).
1.2 Project Summary
1.2.1 Site Location
The project site is located on the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 in La Quinta,
California, as shown in Exhibit A. The site is currently zoned as Medium High Density Residential use in
the City of La Quinta Official Zoning Map. The Project borders residential uses to the north,
Washington Street to the west with residential uses further west, an elementary school to the east,
and Avenue 50 to south with vacant Medium Density Residential land further south.
1.2.2 Project Description
The Project proposes the construction of a two- and three-story apartment complex with
approximately 284 single-family residences over eleven buildings and a clubhouse with amenities on an
approximately 14.57 -acres. Exhibit B demonstrates the site plan for the project.
Construction activities within the Project area will consist of site preparation, grading, building, paving,
and architectural coating. Table 1 summarizes the land use description for the Project Site.
Table 1: Land Use Summary
Land Use
Unit Amount
Size Metric
Apartments Low Rise'
284
Units
Other Asphalt Surfaces
8
Acres
Parking Lott
560.00
Spaces
' Units cover approximately 1.92 acres.
z Parking lot covers approximately 3.64 acres.
1
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Introduction
1.2.3 Sensitive Receptors
Sensitive receptors are considered land uses or other types of population groups that are more
sensitive to air pollution than others due to their exposure. Sensitive population groups include
children, the elderly, the acutely and chronically ill, and those with cardio -respiratory diseases. For
CEQA purposes, a sensitive receptor would be a location where a sensitive individual could remain for
24 -hours or longer, such as residences, hospitals, and schools (etc.).
The closest existing sensitive receptors (to the site area) are single-family residences adjacent to the
north of the project boundary.
1.3 Executive Summary of Findings and Mitigation Measures
The following is a summary of the analysis results:
Construction -Source Emissions
Project construction -source emissions would not exceed applicable regional thresholds of significance
established by the SCAQMD. For localized emissions, the project will not exceed applicable Localized
Significance Thresholds (LSTs) established by the SCAQMD.
Project construction -source emissions would not conflict with the Basin Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP). As discussed herein, the project will comply with all applicable SCAQMD construction -source
emission reduction rules and guidelines. Project construction source emissions would not cause or
substantively contribute to violation of the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) or
National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS).
Established requirements addressing construction equipment operations, and construction material
use, storage, and disposal requirements act to minimize odor impacts that may result from
construction activities. Moreover, construction -source odor emissions would be temporary, short-
term, and intermittent in nature and would not result in persistent impacts that would affect
substantial numbers of people. Potential construction -source odor impacts are therefore considered
less -than -significant.
Operational -Source Emissions
The project operational -sourced emissions would not exceed applicable regional thresholds of
significance established by the SCAQMD. Project operational -source emissions would not result in or
cause a significant localized air quality impact as discussed in the Operations -Related Local Air Quality
Impacts section of this report. Additionally, project -related traffic will not cause or result in CO
concentrations exceeding applicable state and/or federal standards (CO "hotspots). Project
operational -source emissions would therefore not adversely affect sensitive receptors within the
vicinity of the project.
Project operational -source emissions would not conflict with the Basin Air Quality Management Plan
(AQMP). The project's emissions meet SCAQMD regional thresholds and will not result in a significant
cumulative impact. The project does not propose any such uses or activities that would result in
2
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Introduction
potentially significant operational -source odor impacts. Potential operational -source odor impacts are
therefore considered less -than significant.
Project -related GHG emissions meet the County of Riverside Climate Action Plan (CAP) Update
screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (MTCO2e) per year and are also
considered to be less than significant. The project also complies with the goals of the CARB Scoping
Plan, AB -32, and SB -32.
Mitigation Measures
A. Construction Measures
Adherence to SCAQMD Rule 403 is required.
No construction mitigation required.
B. Operational Measures to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions
No operational mitigation required.
3
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Introduction
Exhibit A
Location Map
OK-
� ` 7Yt
t . (n
� rn -
,� - —�
SITE
v7 �ti
• r
OIL''
y �' www►
Avenue 5
F 'J
A,
0
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Introduction
Li
9
o � �
,x —.�• s� � •� to � �
r �u
�iTvF, iTrF�l�
IV' E, -UP, 9
AVENUE 50
sn�
Exhibit B
Site Plan
.J
Jan,. Oer�fms�
� I
Exhibit B
Site Plan
.J
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
2.0 Regulatory Framework and Background
2.1 Air Quality Regulatory Setting
Air pollutants are regulated at the national, state, and air basin level; each agency has a different level
of regulatory responsibility. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulates at the
national level. The California Air Resources Board (ARB) regulates at the state level. The South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulates at the air basin level.
2.1.1 National and State
The EPA is responsible for global, international, and interstate air pollution issues and policies. The EPA
sets national vehicle and stationary source emission standards, oversees approval of all State
Implementation Plans, provides research and guidance for air pollution programs, and sets National Air
Quality Standards, also known as federal standards. There are six common air pollutants, called criteria
pollutants, which were identified from the provisions of the Clean Air Act of 1970.
• Ozone
• Nitrogen Dioxide
• Lead
• Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5)
• Carbon Monoxide
• Particulate Matter
• Sulfur Dioxide
The federal standards were set to protect public health, including that of sensitive individuals; thus, the
standards continue to change as more medical research is available regarding the health effects of the
criteria pollutants. Primary federal standards are the levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate
margin of safety, to project the public health.
A State Implementation Plan is a document prepared by each state describing existing air quality
conditions and measures that will be followed to attain and maintain federal standards. The State
Implementation Plan for the State of California is administered by the ARB, which has overall
responsibility for statewide air quality maintenance and air pollution prevention. California's State
Implementation Plan incorporates individual federal attainment plans for regional air districts—air
district prepares their federal attainment plan, which sent to ARB to be approved and incorporated
into the California State Implementation Plan. Federal attainment plans include the technical
foundation for understanding air quality (e.g., emission inventories and air quality monitoring), control
measures and strategies, and enforcement mechanisms. See
http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aags/aags.htm for additional information on criteria pollutants and
air quality standards.
The federal and state ambient air quality standards are summarized in Table 2 and can also be found at
http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aags/aags2.pdf.
0
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
Table 2: Ambient Air Quality Standards
Notes:
1. California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8 -hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1 and 24 hour), nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter
(PM10, PM2.5, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California
ambient air quality standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations.
2. National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a
year. The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8 -hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over three years, is
equal to or less than the standard. For PM10, the 24 hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour
average concentration above 150 µg/m3 is equal to or less than one. For PM2.5, the 24 hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily
concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard. Contact the U.S. EPA for further clarification and current national
policies.
3. Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature of
25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr. Most measurements of air quality are to be corrected to a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference
pressure of 760 torr; ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume, or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas.
4. Any equivalent measurement method which can be shown to the satisfaction of the ARB to give equivalent results at or near the level of the air
quality standard may be used.
5. National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety to protect the public health.
6. National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a
pollutant.
7. Reference method as described by the U.S. EPA. An "equivalent method" of measurement may be used but must have a "consistent relationship to
the reference method" and must be approved by the U.S. EPA.
California Standards'
National Standardsz
Pollutant
Averaging Time
Primary3,5
Secondary3.6
Method'
Concentrations3 Method
Ozone (03)
1 -Hour 0.09 ppm
Ultraviolet
Same as Primary
Ultraviolet
8 -Hour 0.070 ppm
0.070 ppm (147 µg/m3)
Photometry
Standard
Photometry
Respirable
24 -Hour 50 µg/m3
150 µ/m3
Inertial Separation
Particulate Matter
Gravimetric or Beta
Same as Primary
and Gravimetric
(PM10)8
Annual Arithmetic Mean 20 µg/m3
Attenuation
Standard
Analysis
24 -Hour
35 µg/m3
Same as Primary
Inertial Separation
Fine Particulate
Standard
Matter (PM2.5)8
Annual Arithmetic Mean 12 µg/m3
Gravimetric or Beta
12 µg/m3
15 µg/m3
and Gravimetric
Analysis
Attenuation
1 -Hour 20 ppm (23 µg/m3)
35 ppm (40 µg/m3)
Carbon Monoxide
Non -Dispersive
Non -Dispersive
8 -Hour 9.0 ppm (10 µg/m3)
9 ppm (10 µg/m3)
(CO)
Infrared Photometry
Infrared
8 -Hour
6 ppm (7 µg/m3)
(NDIR)
Photometry (NDIR)
(Lake Tahoe)
1 -Hour 0.18 ppm (339 µg/m3)
100 ppb (188 µg/m3)
Nitrogen Dioxide
Gas Phase
Gas Phase
Annual Arithmetic Mean 0.030 3
ppm (357 µg/m)
3
0.053 ppm (100 µg/m)
Same as Primary
(NO2)'
Chemiluminescence
Chemiluminescence
Standard
1 -Hour 0.25 ppm (655 µg/m3)
75 ppb (196 µg/m3)
3 -Hour - -
- -
0.5 ppm
Ultraviolet
(1300 mg/m3)
Fluorescence;
Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)"
Ultraviolet
Spectrophotometry
.
014 ppm
24 -Hour 0.04 ppm (105 µ
[Ig/ml)
Fluorescence
(for certain areas)to
(Pararosaniline
0.130ppm
Method)
Annual Arithmetic Mean
(for certain areas)10
30 Day Average 1.5 µg/m3
Calendar Qrtr
1.r µn
Same as Primary
High Volume
Lead"
Atomic Absorption
ar
(for certain areas)"
Standard
Sampler and Atomic
Rolling 3 -Month Average
0.15 µg/m3
Absorption
Visibility Reducing
Beta Attenuation and
Particles13
8 -Hour See footnote 13
Transmittance
through Filter Tape
No
National
Standards
Sulfates
24 -Hour 25 µg/m3
Ion Chromatography
Hydrogen Sulfide
1 -Hour 0.03 ppm (42 µg/m3)
Ultraviolet
Fluorescence
Vinyl Chloride"
24 -Hour 0.01 ppm (26 µg/m3)
Gas Chromatography
Notes:
1. California standards for ozone, carbon monoxide (except 8 -hour Lake Tahoe), sulfur dioxide (1 and 24 hour), nitrogen dioxide, and particulate matter
(PM10, PM2.5, and visibility reducing particles), are values that are not to be exceeded. All others are not to be equaled or exceeded. California
ambient air quality standards are listed in the Table of Standards in Section 70200 of Title 17 of the California Code of Regulations.
2. National standards (other than ozone, particulate matter, and those based on annual arithmetic mean) are not to be exceeded more than once a
year. The ozone standard is attained when the fourth highest 8 -hour concentration measured at each site in a year, averaged over three years, is
equal to or less than the standard. For PM10, the 24 hour standard is attained when the expected number of days per calendar year with a 24-hour
average concentration above 150 µg/m3 is equal to or less than one. For PM2.5, the 24 hour standard is attained when 98 percent of the daily
concentrations, averaged over three years, are equal to or less than the standard. Contact the U.S. EPA for further clarification and current national
policies.
3. Concentration expressed first in units in which it was promulgated. Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference temperature of
25°C and a reference pressure of 760 torr. Most measurements of air quality are to be corrected to a reference temperature of 25°C and a reference
pressure of 760 torr; ppm in this table refers to ppm by volume, or micromoles of pollutant per mole of gas.
4. Any equivalent measurement method which can be shown to the satisfaction of the ARB to give equivalent results at or near the level of the air
quality standard may be used.
5. National Primary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary, with an adequate margin of safety to protect the public health.
6. National Secondary Standards: The levels of air quality necessary to protect the public welfare from any known or anticipated adverse effects of a
pollutant.
7. Reference method as described by the U.S. EPA. An "equivalent method" of measurement may be used but must have a "consistent relationship to
the reference method" and must be approved by the U.S. EPA.
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
8. On December 14, 2012, the national annual PM2.5 primary standard was lowered from 15 pg/m3 to 12.0 pg/m3. The existing national 24-hour PM2.5
standards (primary and secondary) were retained at 35 pg/m3, as was the annual secondary standard of 15 µg/m3. The existing 24-hour PM10
standards (primary and secondary) of 150 pg/m3 also were retained. The form of the annual primary and secondary standards is the annual mean,
averaged over 3 years.
9. To attain the 1 -hour national standard, the 3 -year average of the annual 98th percentile of the 1 -hour daily maximum concentrations at each site
must not exceed 100 ppb. Note that the national 1 -hour standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per
million (ppm). To directly compare the national 1 -hour standard to the California standards the units can be converted from ppb to ppm. In this case,
the national standard of 100 ppb is identical to 0.100 ppm.
10. On June 2, 2010, a new 1 -hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24-hour and annual primary standards were revoked. To attain the 1 -
hour national standard, the 3 -year average of the annual 99th percentile of the 1 -hour daily maximum concentrations at each site must not exceed
75 ppb. The 1971 SO2 national standards (24-hour and annual) remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 standard,
except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain in effect until implementation plans to attain or
maintain the 2010 standards are approved.
Note that the 1 -hour national standard is in units of parts per billion (ppb). California standards are in units of parts per million (ppm). To directly
compare the 1 -hour national standard to the California standard the units can be converted to ppm. In this case, the national standard of 75 ppb is
identical to 0.075 ppm.
11. The ARB has identified lead and vinyl chloride as 'toxic air contaminants' with no threshold level of exposure for adverse health effects determined.
These actions allow for the implementation of control measures at levels below the ambient concentrations specified for these pollutants.
12. The national standard for lead was revised on October 15, 2008 to a rolling 3 -month average. The 1978 lead standard (1.5 µg/m3 as a quarterly
average) remains in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2008 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the
1978 standard, the 1978 standard remains in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2008 standard are approved.
13. In 1989, the ARB converted both the general statewide 10 -mile visibility standard and the Lake Tahoe 30 -mile visibility standard to instrumental
equivalents, which are "extinction of 0.23 per kilometer" and "extinction of 0.07 per kilometer" for the statewide and Lake Tahoe Air Basin standards,
respectively.
Several pollutants listed in Table 2 are not addressed in this analysis. Analysis of lead is not included in
this report because the project is not anticipated to emit lead. Visibility -reducing particles are not
explicitly addressed in this analysis because particulate matter is addressed. The project is not
expected to generate or be exposed to vinyl chloride because proposed project uses do not utilize the
chemical processes that create this pollutant and there are no such uses in the project vicinity. The
proposed project is not expected to cause exposure to hydrogen sulfide because it would not generate
hydrogen sulfide in any substantial quantity.
2.1.2 South Coast Air Quality Management District
The agency for air pollution control for the Salton Sea Air Basin (basin) is the South Coast Air Quality
Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD is responsible for controlling emissions primarily from
stationary sources. SCAQMD maintains air quality monitoring stations throughout the basin. SCAQMD,
in coordination with the Southern California Association of Governments, is also responsible for
developing, updating, and implementing the Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) for the basin. An
AQMP is a plan prepared and implemented by an air pollution district for a county or region designated
as nonattainment of the federal and/or California ambient air quality standards. The term
nonattainment area is used to refer to an air basin where one or more ambient air quality standards
are exceeded.
Every three (3) years the SCAQMD prepares a new AQMP, updating the previous plan and having a 20 -
year horizon.
8
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
On March 23, 2017 CARB approved the 2016 AQMP. The 2016 AQMP is a regional blueprint for
achieving the federal air quality standards and healthful air.
The 2016 AQMP includes both stationary and mobile source strategies to ensure that rapidly
approaching attainment deadlines are met, that public health is protected to the maximum extent
feasible, and that the region is not faced with burdensome sanctions if the Plan is not approved or if
the NAAQS are not met on time. As with every AQMP, a comprehensive analysis of emissions,
meteorology, atmospheric chemistry, regional growth projections, and the impact of existing control
measures is updated with the latest data and methods. The most significant air quality challenge in the
Basin is to reduce nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions sufficiently to meet the upcoming ozone standard
deadlines. The primary goal of the 2016 AQMP is to meet clean air standards and protect public health,
including ensuring benefits to environmental justice and disadvantaged communities. Now that the
plan has been approved by CARB, it has been forwarded to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
for its review. If approved by EPA, the plan becomes federally enforceable.
South Coast AQMD has initiated the development of the 2022 AQMP to address the attainment of the
2015 8 -hour ozone standard (70 ppb) for South Coast Air Basin and Coachella Valley. To support the
development of mobile source strategies for the 2022 AQMP, South Coast AQMD, in conjunction with
California Air Resources Board, has established Mobile Source Working Groups which are open to all
interested parties..
South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules
The AQMP for the basin establishes a program of rules and regulations administered by SCAQMD to
obtain attainment of the state and federal standards. Some of the rules and regulations that apply to
this Project include, but are not limited to, the following:
SCAQMD Rule 402 prohibits a person from discharging from any source whatsoever such quantities of
air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any
considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or
safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or
damage to business or property.
SCAQMD Rule 403 governs emissions of fugitive dust during construction and operation activities.
Compliance with this rule is achieved through application of standard Best Management Practices,
such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, covering haul vehicles, restricting
vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 miles per hour, sweeping loose dirt from paved site access
roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds exceed 25 mph, and establishing a permanent
ground cover on finished sites.
Rule 403 requires that fugitive dust be controlled with best available control measures so that the
presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the
emission source. In addition, Rule 403 requires implementation of dust suppression techniques to
prevent fugitive dust from creating a nuisance off site. Applicable suppression techniques are indicated
below and include but are not limited to the following:
0
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
• Apply nontoxic chemical soil stabilizers according to manufacturers' specifications to all inactive
construction areas (previously graded areas in active for 10 days or more).
• Water active sites at least three times daily.
• Cover all trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials, or maintain at least 2 feet of
freeboard in accordance with the requirements of California Vehicle Code (CVC) section 23114.
• Pave construction access roads at least 100 feet onto the site from the main road.
• Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved roads to 15 mph or less.
• Suspension of all grading activities when wind speeds (including instantaneous wind gusts)
exceed 25 mph.
• Bumper strips or similar best management practices shall be provided where vehicles enter and
exit the construction site onto paved roads or wash off trucks and any equipment leaving the
site each trip.
• Replanting disturbed areas as soon as practical.
• During all construction activities, construction contractors shall sweep on-site and off-site
streets if silt is carried to adjacent public thoroughfares, to reduce the amount of particulate
matter on public streets.
SCAQMD Rule 1113 governs the sale, use, and manufacturing of architectural coating and limits the
VOC content in paints and paint solvents. This rule regulates the VOC content of paints available during
construction. Therefore, all paints and solvents used during construction and operation of project must
comply with Rule 1113.
Idling Diesel Vehicle Trucks — Idling for more than 5 minutes in any one location is prohibited within
California borders.
Rule 2702. The SCAQMD adopted Rule 2702 on February 6, 2009, which establishes a voluntary air
quality investment program from which SCAQMD can collect funds from parties that desire certified
GHG emission reductions, pool those funds, and use them to purchase or fund GHG emission reduction
projects within two years, unless extended by the Governing Board. Priority will be given to projects
that result in co -benefit emission reductions of GHG emissions and criteria or toxic air pollutants within
environmental justice areas. Further, this voluntary program may compete with the cap -and -trade
program identified for implementation in CARB's Scoping Plan, or a Federal cap and trade program.
2.1.3 Local
Local jurisdictions, such as the County of Riverside and City of La Quinta, have the authority and
responsibility to reduce air pollution through their police power and decision-making authority.
Specifically, the County and City are responsible for the assessment and mitigation of air emissions
resulting from its land use decisions. The County and City are also responsible for the implementation
of transportation control measures as outlined in the 2016 AQMP. Examples of such measures include
bus turnouts, energy-efficient streetlights, and synchronized traffic signals. In accordance with CEQA
requirements and the CEQA review process, the County and City assesses the air quality impacts of
10
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
new development projects, requires mitigation of potentially significant air quality impacts by
conditioning discretionary permits, and monitors and enforces implementation of such mitigation.
The County relies on the expertise of the SCAQMD and utilizes the SCAQMD CEQA Air Quality
Handbook as the guidance document for the environmental review of plans and development
proposals within its jurisdiction.
County of Riverside General Plan
The Air Quality Element of the County of Riverside General Plan summarizes air quality issues in the
Basin, air quality -related plans and programs administered by federal, state, and special purpose
agencies, and establishes goals and policies to improve air quality. These goals and policies in the Air
Quality Element that relate to the proposed project include:
Multi -jurisdictional Cooperation:
AQ 1.1 Promote and participate with regional and local agencies, both public and private, to
protect and improve air quality.
AQ 1.2 Support the Southern California Association of Government's (SCAG) Regional Growth
Management Plan by developing intergovernmental agreements with appropriate
governmental entities such as the Western Riverside Council of Governments (WRCOG),
the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), sanitation districts, water
districts, and those subregional entities identified in the Regional Growth Management
Plan.
AQ 1.3 Participate in the development and update of those regional air quality management
plans required under federal and state law, and meet all standards established for clean
air in these plans.
AQ 1.4 Coordinate with the SCAQMD and MDAQMD to ensure that all elements of air quality
plans regarding reduction of air pollutant emissions are being enforced.
AQ 1.5 Establish and implement air quality, land use and circulation measures that improve not
only the County's environment but the entire regions.
AQ 1.6 Establish a level playing field by working with local jurisdictions to simultaneously adopt
policies similar to those in this Air Quality Element.
AQ 1.7 Support legislation which promotes cleaner industry, clean fuel vehicles and more
efficient burning engines and fuels.
AQ 1.8 Support the introduction of federal, state or regional enabling legislation to permit the
County to promote inventive air quality programs, which otherwise could not be
implemented.
11
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
AQ 1.9 Encourage, publicly recognize and reward innovative approaches that improve air
quality.
AQ 1.10 Work with regional and local agencies to evaluate the feasibility of implementing a
system of charges (e.g., pollution charges, user fees, congestion pricing and toll roads)
that requires individuals who undertake polluting activities to bear the economic cost of
their actions where possible.
AQ 1.11 Involve environmental groups, the business community, special interests, and the
general public in the formulation and implementation of programs that effectively
reduce airborne pollutants.
Sensitive Receptors:
AQ 2.1 The County land use planning efforts shall assure that sensitive receptors are separated
and protected from polluting point sources to the greatest extent possible.
AQ 2.2 Require site plan designs to protect people and land uses sensitive to air pollution
through the use of barriers and/or distance from emissions sources when possible.
AQ 2.3 Encourage the use of pollution control measures such as landscaping, vegetation and
other materials, which trap particulate matter or control pollution.
Stationary Pollution Sources:
AQ 4.1 Encourage the use of building materials/methods which reduce emissions.
AQ 4.2 Require the use of all feasible efficient heating equipment and other appliances, such as
water heaters, swimming pool heaters, cooking equipment, refrigerators, furnaces and
boiler units.
AQ 4.3 Require centrally heated facilities to utilize automated time clocks or occupant sensors
to control heating where feasible.
AQ 4.5 Require stationary pollution sources to minimize the release of toxic pollutants through:
• Design features;
• Operating procedures;
• Preventive maintenance;
• Operator training; and
• Emergency response planning
AQ 4.6 Require stationary air pollution sources to comply with applicable air district rules and
control measures.
12
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
AQ 4.7 To the greatest extent possible, require every project to mitigate any of its anticipated
emissions which exceed allowable emissions as established by the SCAQMD, MDAQMD,
SOCAB, the Environmental Protection Agency and the California Air Resources Board.
AQ 4.8 Expand, as appropriate, measures contained in the County's Fugitive Dust Reduction
Program for the Coachella Valley to the entire County.
AQ 4.9 Require compliance with SCAQMD Rules 403 and 403.1, and support appropriate future
measures to reduce fugitive dust emanating from construction sites.
AQ 4.10 Coordinate with the SCAQMD and MDAQMD to create a communications plan to alert
those conducting grading operations in the County of first, second, and third stage smog
alerts, and when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour. During these instances all
grading operations should be suspended.
Energy Efficiency and Conservation:
AQ 5.1 Utilize source reduction, recycling and other appropriate measures to reduce the
amount of solid waste disposed of in landfills.
AQ 5.4 Encourage the incorporation of energy-efficient design elements, including appropriate
site orientation and the use of shade and windbreak trees to reduce fuel consumption
for heating and cooling.
Particulate Matter:
AQ 15.1 Identify and monitor sources, enforce existing regulations, and promote stronger
controls to reduce particulate matter.
Multi -jurisdictional Cooperation:
AQ 16.1 Cooperate with local, regional, state and federal jurisdictions to better control
particulate matter.
Control Measures:
AQ 17.1 Reduce particulate matter from agriculture, construction, demolition, debris hauling,
street cleaning, utility maintenance, railroad rights-of-way, and off-road vehicles to the
extent possible.
AQ 17.3 Identify and create a control plan for areas within the County prone to wind erosion of
soil.
AQ 17.4 Adopt incentives, regulations and/or procedures to manage paved and unpaved roads
and parking lots so they produce the minimum practicable level of particulates.
13
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
AQ 17.5 Adopt incentives and/or procedures to limit dust from agricultural lands and operations,
where applicable.
AQ 17.6 Reduce emissions from building materials and methods that generate excessive
pollutants, through incentives and/or regulations.
2.2 Greenhouse Gas Regulatory Setting
2.2.1 International
Many countries around the globe have made an effort to reduce GHGs since climate change is a global
issue.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In 1988, the United Nations and the World
Meteorological Organization established the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change to assess the
scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of
risk of human -induced climate change, its potential impacts, and options for adaptation and mitigation.
United Nations. The United States participates in the United Nations Framework Convention on
Climate Change (UNFCCC) (signed on March 21, 1994). Under the Convention, governments gather and
share information on greenhouse gas emissions, national policies, and best practices; launch national
strategies for addressing greenhouse gas emissions and adapting to expected impacts, including the
provision of financial and technological support to developing countries; and cooperate in preparing
for adaptation to the impacts of climate change.
The 2014 UN Climate Change Conference in Lima Peru provided a unique opportunity to engage all
countries to assess how developed countries are implementing actions to reduce emissions.
Kyoto Protocol. The Kyoto Protocol is a treaty made under the UNFCCC and was the first international
agreement to regulate GHG emissions. It has been estimated that if the commitments outlined in the
Kyoto Protocol are met, global GHG emissions could be reduced by an estimated 5 percent from 1990
levels during the first commitment period of 2008 — 2012 (UNFCCC 1997). On December 8, 2012, the
Doha Amendment to the Kyoto Protocol was adopted. The amendment includes: New commitments
for Annex I Parties to the Kyoto Protocol who agreed to take on commitments in a second commitment
period from 2013 — 2020; a revised list of greenhouse gases (GHG) to be reported on by Parties in the
second commitment period; and Amendments to several articles of the Kyoto Protocol which
specifically referenced issues pertaining to the first commitment period and which needed to be
updated for the second commitment period.
2.2.2 National
Greenhouse Gas Endangerment. On December 2, 2009, the EPA announced that GHGs threaten the
public health and welfare of the American people. The EPA also states that GHG emissions from on -
road vehicles contribute to that threat. The decision was based on Massachusetts v. EPA (Supreme
14
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
Court Case 05-1120) which argued that GHGs are air pollutants covered by the Clean Air Act and that
the EPA has authority to regulate those emissions.
Clean Vehicles. Congress first passed the Corporate Average Fuel Economy law in 1975 to increase the
fuel economy of cars and light duty trucks. The law has become more stringent over time. On May 19,
2009, President Obama put in motion a new national policy to increase fuel economy for all new cars
and trucks sold in the United States. On April 1, 2010, the EPA and the Department of Transportation's
National Highway Safety Administration announced a joint final rule establishing a national program
that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel economy for new cars and trucks sold in
the United States.
The first phase of the national program would apply to passenger cars, light-duty trucks, and medium -
duty passenger vehicles, covering model years 2012 through 2016. They require these vehicles to
meet an estimated combined average emissions level of 250 grams of carbon dioxide per mile,
equivalent to 35.5 miles per gallon if the automobile industry were to meet this carbon dioxide level
solely through fuel economy improvements. Together, these standards would cut carbon dioxide
emissions by an estimated 960 million metric tons and 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the lifetime of the
vehicles sold under the program (model years 2012-2016). The second phase of the national program
would involve proposing new fuel economy and greenhouse gas standards for model years 2017 —
2025 by September 1, 2011.
On October 25, 2010, the EPA and the U.S. Department of Transportation proposed the first national
standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve fuel efficiency of heavy-duty trucks and
buses. For combination tractors, the agencies are proposing engine and vehicle standards that begin in
the 2014 model year and achieve up to a 20 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions and fuel
consumption by the 2018 model year. For heavy-duty pickup trucks and vans, the agencies are
proposing separate gasoline and diesel truck standards, which phase in starting in the 2014 model year
and achieve up to a 10 percent reduction for gasoline vehicles and 15 percent reduction for diesel
vehicles by 2018 model year (12 and 17 percent respectively if accounting for air conditioning leakage).
Lastly, for vocational vehicles, the agencies are proposing engine and vehicle standards starting in the
2014 model year which would achieve up to a 10 percent reduction in fuel consumption and carbon
dioxide emissions by 2018 model year.
Issued by NHTSA and EPA in March 2020 (published on April 30, 2020 and effective after June 29,
2020), the Safer Affordable Fuel -Efficient Vehicles Rule would maintain the CAFE and CO2 standards
applicable in model year 2020 for model years 2021 through 2026. The estimated CAFE and CO2
standards for model year 2020 are 43.7 mpg and 204 grams of CO2 per mile for passenger cars and
31.3 mpg and 284 grams of CO2 per mile for light trucks, projecting an overall industry average of 37
mpg, as compared to 46.7 mpg under the standards issued in 2012. This Rule also excludes CO2 -
15
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
equivalent emission improvements associated with air conditioning refrigerants and leakage (and,
optionally, offsets for nitrous oxide and methane emissions) after model year 2020.1
Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases. On January 1, 2010, the EPA started requiring large
emitters of heat -trapping emissions to begin collecting GHG data under a new reporting system. Under
the rule, suppliers of fossil fuels or industrial greenhouse gases, manufacturers of vehicles and engines,
and facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons or more per year of greenhouse gas emissions are required
to submit annual reports to the EPA.
Climate Adaption Plan. The EPA Plan identifies priority actions the Agency will take to incorporate
considerations of climate change into its programs, policies, rules and operations to ensure they are
effective under future climatic conditions. The following link provides more information on the EPA
Plan: https://www.epa.gov/arc-x/planning-climate-change-adaptation
2.2.3 California
California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 6. CCR Title 24, Part 6: California's Energy Efficiency
Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24) were first established in 1978 in
response to a legislative mandate to reduce California's energy consumption. The standards are
updated periodically to allow consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency
technologies and methods. Although it was not originally intended to reduce GHG emissions,
electricity production by fossil fuels results in GHG emissions and energy efficient buildings require less
electricity. Therefore, increased energy efficiency results in decreased GHG emissions.
The Energy Commission adopted 2008 Standards on April 23, 2008 and Building Standards Commission
approved them for publication on September 11, 2008. These updates became effective on August 1,
2009. 2013, 2016, and 2019 standards have been approved and became effective July 1, 2014, January
1, 2016, and January 1, 2020, respectively.
California Code of Regulations (CCR) Title 24, Part 11. All buildings for which an application for a
building permit is submitted on or after January 1, 2020 must follow the 2019 standards. Energy
efficient buildings require less electricity; therefore, increased energy efficiency reduces fossil fuel
consumption and decreases greenhouse gas emissions. The following links provide more information
on Title 24, Part 11:
https://www.dgs.ca.gov/BSC/Codes
https://www.energy.ca.gov/sites/default/files/2020-03/Title 24 2019 Building Standards FAQ ada.pdf
California Green Building Standards On January 12, 2010, the State Building Standards Commission
unanimously adopted updates to the California Green Building Standards Code, which went into effect
'National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), 2018. Federal Register/ Vol. 83, No. 165 /
Friday, August 24, 2018 / Proposed Rules, The Safer Affordable Fuel -Efficient (SAFE) Vehicles Rule for Model Years 2021-2026 Passenger Cars and Light
Trucks 2018. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2018-08-24/pdf/2018-16820.pdf.
16
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
on January 1, 2011. The Housing and Community Development (HCD) updated CALGreen through the
2015 Triennial Code Adoption Cycle, during the 2016 to 2017 fiscal year. During the 2019-2020 fiscal
year, the Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) updated CALGreen through the
2019 Triennial Code Adoption Cycle.
The Code is a comprehensive and uniform regulatory code for all residential, commercial and school
buildings. CCR Title 24, Part 11: California Green Building Standards (Title 24) became effective in 2001
in response to continued efforts to reduce GHG emissions associated with energy consumption. CCR
Title 24, Part 11 now require that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ building
commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from landfills, and
install low pollutant -emitting finish materials. One focus of CCR Title 24, Part 11 is water conservation
measures, which reduce GHG emissions by reducing electrical consumption associated with pumping
and treating water. CCR Title 24, Part 11 has approximately 52 nonresidential mandatory measures
and an additional 130 provisions for optional use. Some key mandatory measures for commercial
occupancies include specified parking for clean air vehicles, a 20 percent reduction of potable water
use within buildings, a 50 percent construction waste diversion from landfills, use of building finish
materials that emit low levels of volatile organic compounds, and commissioning for new,
nonresidential buildings over 10,000 square feet.
The 2019 CalGreen Code includes the following changes and/or additional regulations:
Single-family homes built with the 2019 standards will use about 7 percent less energy due to energy
efficiency measures versus those built under the 2016 standards. Once rooftop solar electricity
generation is factored in, homes built under the 2019 standards will use about 53 percent less energy
than those under the 2016 standards. Nonresidential buildings will use about 30 percent less energy
due mainly to lighting upgrades2.
HCD modified the best management practices for stormwater pollution prevention adding Section
5.106.2 for projects that disturb one or more acres of land. This section requires projects that disturb
one acre or more of land or less than one acre of land but are part of a larger common plan of
development or sale must comply with the post -construction requirement detailed in the applicable
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) General Permit for Stormwater Discharges
Associated with Construction and Land Disturbance Activities issued by the State Water Resources
Control Board. The NPDES permits require post -construction runoff (post -project hydrology) to match
the preconstruction runoff pre -project hydrology) with installation of post -construction stormwater
management measures.
HCD added sections 5.106.4.1.3 and 5.106.4.1.5 in regards to bicycle parking. Section 5.106.4.1.3
requires new buildings with tenant spaces that have 10 or more tenant -occupants, provide secure
I https://ww2.energy.ca.gov/title24/2019standards/documents/2018_Title_24_2019_Building_Standards_FAQ.pdf
17
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
bicycle parking for 5 percent of the tenant -occupant vehicular parking spaces with a minimum of one
bicycle parking facility. In addition, Section 5.106.4.1.5 states that acceptable bicycle parking facility for
Sections 5.106.4.1.2 through 5.106.4.1.4 shall be convenient from the street and shall meeting one of
the following: (1) covered, lockable enclosures with permanently anchored racks for bicycles; (2)
lockable bicycle rooms with permanently anchored racks; or (3) lockable, permanently anchored
bicycle lockers.
HCD amended section 5.106.5.3.5 allowing future charging spaces to qualify as designated parking for
clean air vehicles.
HCD updated section 5.303.3.3 in regards to showerhead flow rates. This update reduced the flow rate
to 1.8 GPM.
HCD amended section 5.304.1 for outdoor potable water use in landscape areas and repealed sections
5.304.2 and 5.304.3. The update requires nonresidential developments to comply with a local water
efficient landscape ordinance or the current California Department of Water Resource's' Model Water
Efficient Landscape Ordinance (MWELO), whichever is more stringent. Some updates were also made
in regards to the outdoor potable water use in landscape areas for public schools and community
colleges.
HCD updated Section 5.504.5.3 in regards to the use of MERV filters in mechanically ventilated
buildings. This update changed the filter use from MERV 8 to MERV 13.
The California Green Building Standards Code does not prevent a local jurisdiction from adopting a
more stringent code as state law provides methods for local enhancements. The Code recognizes that
many jurisdictions have developed existing construction and demolition ordinances, and defers to
them as the ruling guidance provided they provide a minimum 50 -percent diversion requirement. The
code also provides exemptions for areas not served by construction and demolition recycling
infrastructure. State building code provides the minimum standard that buildings need to meet in
order to be certified for occupancy. Enforcement is generally through the local building official. The
following link provides more on CalGreen Building Standards:
http://www.bsc.ca.gov/Home/CALGreen.aspx
Executive Order S-3-05. California Governor issued Executive Order S-3-05, GHG Emission, in June
2005, which established the following targets:
• By 2010, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 2000 levels;
• By 2020, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels.
• By 2050, California shall reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels.
The executive order directed the secretary of the California Environmental Protection Agency (CaIEPA)
to coordinate a multi -agency effort to reduce GHG emissions to the target levels. To comply with the
Executive Order, the secretary of CaIEPA created the California Climate Action Team (CAT), made up of
18
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
members from various state agencies and commissions. The team released its first report in March
2006. The report proposed to achieve the targets by building on the voluntary actions of businesses,
local governments, and communities and through State incentive and regulatory programs.
Executive Order S-01-07. Executive Order S-1-07 was issued in 2007 and proclaims that the
transportation sector is the main source of GHG emissions in the State, since it generates more than 40
percent of the State's GHG emissions. It establishes a goal to reduce the carbon intensity of
transportation fuels sold in the State by at least ten percent by 2020. This Order also directs CARB to
determine whether this Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS) could be adopted as a discrete early -action
measure as part of the effort to meet the mandates in AB 32.
On April 23, 2009 CARB approved the proposed regulation to implement the low carbon fuel standard
and began implementation on January 1, 2011. The low carbon fuel standard is anticipated to reduce
GHG emissions by about 16 MMT per year by 2020. CARB approved some amendments to the LCFS in
December 2011, which were implemented on January 1, 2013. In September 2015, the Board
approved the re -adoption of the LCFS, which became effective on January 1, 2016, to address
procedural deficiencies in the way the original regulation was adopted. In 2018, the Board approved
amendments to the regulation, which included strengthening and smoothing the carbon intensity
benchmarks through 2030 in-line with California's 2030 GHG emission reduction target enacted
through SB 32, adding new crediting opportunities to promote zero emission vehicle adoption,
alternative jet fuel, carbon capture and sequestration, and advanced technologies to achieve deep
decarbonization in the transportation sector.
The LCFS is designed to encourage the use of cleaner low -carbon transportation fuels in California,
encourage the production of those fuels, and therefore, reduce GHG emissions and decrease
petroleum dependence in the transportation sector. Separate standards are established for gasoline
and diesel fuels and the alternative fuels that can replace each. The standards are "back-loaded", with
more reductions required in the last five years, than the first five years. This schedule allows for the
development of advanced fuels that are lower in carbon than today's fuels and the market penetration
of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, battery electric vehicles, fuel cell vehicles, and flexible fuel vehicles.
It is anticipated that compliance with the low carbon fuel standard will be based on a combination of
both lower carbon fuels and more efficient vehicles.
Reformulated gasoline mixed with corn -derived ethanol at ten percent by volume and low sulfur diesel
fuel represent the baseline fuels. Lower carbon fuels may be ethanol, biodiesel, renewable diesel, or
blends of these fuels with gasoline or diesel as appropriate. Compressed natural gas and liquefied
natural gas also may be low carbon fuels. Hydrogen and electricity, when used in fuel cells or electric
vehicles are also considered as low carbon fuels for the low carbon fuel standard.
SB 97. Senate Bill 97 (SB 97) was adopted August 2007 and acknowledges that climate change is a
prominent environmental issue that requires analysis under CEQA. SB 97 directed the Governor's
Office of Planning and Research (OPR), which is part of the State Resource Agency, to prepare, develop,
and transmit to CARB guidelines for the feasible mitigation of GHG emissions or the effects of GHG
19
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
emissions, as required by CEQA, by July 1, 2009. The Resources Agency was required to certify and
adopt those guidelines by January 1, 2010.
Pursuant to the requirements of SB 97 as stated above, on December 30, 2009 the Natural Resources
Agency adopted amendments to the state CEQA guidelines that address GHG emissions. The CEQA
Guidelines Amendments changed 14 sections of the CEQA Guidelines and incorporate GHG language
throughout the Guidelines. However, no GHG emissions thresholds of significance are provided and no
specific mitigation measures are identified. The GHG emission reduction amendments went into effect
on March 18, 2010 and are summarized below:
• Climate action plans and other greenhouse gas reduction plans can be used to determine whether
a project has significant impacts, based upon its compliance with the plan.
• Local governments are encouraged to quantify the greenhouse gas emissions of proposed projects,
noting that they have the freedom to select the models and methodologies that best meet their
needs and circumstances. The section also recommends consideration of several qualitative
factors that may be used in the determination of significance, such as the extent to which the given
project complies with state, regional, or local GHG reduction plans and policies. OPR does not set
or dictate specific thresholds of significance. Consistent with existing CEQA Guidelines, OPR
encourages local governments to develop and publish their own thresholds of significance for GHG
impacts assessment.
• When creating their own thresholds of significance, local governments may consider the thresholds
of significance adopted or recommended by other public agencies, or recommended by experts.
• New amendments include guidelines for determining methods to mitigate the effects of
greenhouse gas emissions in Appendix F of the CEQA Guidelines.
• OPR is clear to state that "to qualify as mitigation, specific measures from an existing plan must be
identified and incorporated into the project; general compliance with a plan, by itself, is not
mitigation."
• OPR's emphasizes the advantages of analyzing GHG impacts on an institutional, programmatic
level. OPR therefore approves tiering of environmental analyses and highlights some benefits of
such an approach.
• Environmental impact reports (EIRs) must specifically consider a project's energy use and energy
efficiency potential.
AB 32. The California State Legislature enacted AB 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of
2006. AB 32 requires that greenhouse gases emitted in California be reduced to 1990 levels by the year
2020. "Greenhouse gases" as defined under AB 32 include carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide,
hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and sulfur hexafluoride. ARB is the state agency charged with
monitoring and regulating sources of greenhouse gases. AB 32 states the following:
Global warming poses a serious threat to the economic well-being, public health, natural resources,
and the environment of California. The potential adverse impacts of global warming include the
exacerbation of air quality problems, a reduction in the quality and supply of water to the state from
the Sierra snowpack, a rise in sea levels resulting in the displacement of thousands of coastal
20
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
businesses and residences, damage to marine ecosystems and the natural environment, and an
increase in the incidences of infectious diseases, asthma, and other human health-related problems.
The ARB Board approved the 1990 greenhouse gas emissions level of 427 million metric tons of carbon
dioxide equivalent (MMTCO2e) on December 6, 2007 (California Air Resources Board 2007).
Therefore, emissions generated in California in 2020 are required to be equal to or less than 427
MMTCO2e. Emissions in 2020 in a "business as usual" scenario are estimated to be 596 MMTCO2e.
Under AB 32, the ARB published its Final Expanded List of Early Action Measures to Reduce
Greenhouse Gas Emissions in California. Discrete early action measures are currently underway or are
enforceable by January 1, 2010. The ARB has 44 early action measures that apply to the
transportation, commercial, forestry, agriculture, cement, oil and gas, fire suppression, fuels,
education, energy efficiency, electricity, and waste sectors. Of these early action measures, nine are
considered discrete early action measures, as they are regulatory and enforceable by January 1, 2010.
The ARB estimates that the 44 recommendations are expected to result in reductions of at least 42
MMTCO2e by 2020, representing approximately 25 percent of the 2020 target.
The ARB's Climate Change Scoping Plan (Scoping Plan) contains measures designed to reduce the
State's emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020 (California Air Resources Board 2008). The Scoping
Plan identifies recommended measures for multiple greenhouse gas emission sectors and the
associated emission reductions needed to achieve the year 2020 emissions target—each sector has a
different emission reduction target. Most of the measures target the transportation and electricity
sectors. As stated in the Scoping Plan, the key elements of the strategy for achieving the 2020
greenhouse gas target include:
• Expanding and strengthening existing energy efficiency programs as well as building and appliance
standards;
• Achieving a statewide renewables energy mix of 33 percent;
• Developing a California cap -and -trade program that links with other Western Climate Initiative
partner programs to create a regional market system;
• Establishing targets for transportation -related greenhouse gas emissions for regions throughout
California and pursuing policies and incentives to achieve those targets;
• Adopting and implementing measures pursuant to existing State laws and policies, Including
California's clean car standards, goods movement measures, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard;
and
• Creating targeted fees, including a public goods charge on water use, fees on high global warming
potential gases, and a fee to fund the administrative costs of the State's long-term commitment to
AB 32 implementation.
In addition, the Scoping Plan differentiates between "capped" and "uncapped" strategies. "Capped"
strategies are subject to the proposed cap -and -trade program. The Scoping Plan states that the
inclusion of these emissions within the cap -and trade program will help ensure that the year 2020
21
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
emission targets are met despite some degree of uncertainty in the emission reduction estimates for
any individual measure. Implementation of the capped strategies is calculated to achieve a sufficient
amount of reductions by 2020 to achieve the emission target contained in AB 32. "Uncapped"
strategies that will not be subject to the cap -and -trade emissions caps and requirements are provided
as a margin of safety by accounting for additional greenhouse gas emission reduction S.4
Senate Bill 100. Senate Bill 100 (SB 100) requires 100 percent of total retail sales of electricity in
California to come from eligible renewable energy resources and zero -carbon resources by December
31, 2045. SB 100 was adopted September 2018.
The interim thresholds from prior Senate Bills and Executive Orders would also remain in effect. These
include Senate Bill 1078 (SB 1078), which requires retail sellers of electricity, including investor-owned
utilities and community choice aggregators, to provide at least 20 percent of their supply from
renewable sources by 2017. Senate Bill 107 (SB 107) which changed the target date to 2010. Executive
Order S-14-08, which was signed on November 2008 and expanded the State's Renewable Energy
Standard to 33 percent renewable energy by 2020. Executive Order S-21-09 directed the CARB to
adopt regulations by July 31, 2010 to enforce S-14-08. Senate Bill X1-2 codifies the 33 percent
renewable energy requirement by 2020.
SB 375. Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) was adopted September 2008 and aligns regional transportation
planning efforts, regional GHG emission reduction targets, and land use and housing allocation. SB 375
requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to adopt a sustainable communities strategy (SCS)
or alternate planning strategy (APS) that will prescribe land use allocation in that MPOs Regional
Transportation Plan (RTP). CARE, in consultation with each MPO, will provide each affected region
with reduction targets for GHGs emitted by passenger cars and light trucks in the region for the years
2020 and 2035. These reduction targets will be updated every eight years but can be updated every
four years if advancements in emissions technologies affect the reduction strategies to achieve the
targets. CARB is also charged with reviewing each MPO's sustainable communities strategy or
alternate planning strategy for consistency with its assigned targets.
The proposed project is located within the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG),
which has authority to develop the SCS or APS. For the SCAG region, the targets set by CARB are at
eight percent below 2005 per capita GHG emissions levels by 2020 and 13 percent below 2005 per
capita GHG emissions levels by 2035. On April 4, 2012, SCAG adopted the 2012-2035 Regional
Transportation Plan / Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), which meets the CARB emission
reduction requirements.
On September 3, 2020, SCAG's Regional Council approved and fully adopted the Connect SoCal (2020-
2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy), and the addendum to the
Connect SoCal Program Environmental Impact Report. Connect SoCal is a long-range visioning plan that
builds upon and expands land use and transportation strategies established over several planning
cycles to increase mobility options and achieve a more sustainable growth pattern. Connect SoCal
outlines more than $638 billion in transportation system investments through 2045. Connect SoCal is
supported by a combination of transportation and land use strategies that help the region achieve
22
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
state greenhouse gas emission reduction goals and federal Clean Air Act requirements, preserve open
space areas, improve public health and roadway safety, support our vital goods movement industry
and utilize resources more efficiently. By integrating the Forecasted Development Pattern with a suite
of financially constrained transportation investments, Connect SoCal can reach the regional target of
reducing greenhouse gases, or GHGs, from autos and light-duty trucks by 8 percent per capita by 2020,
and 19 percent by 2035 (compared to 2005 levels).
City and County land use policies, including General Plans, are not required to be consistent with the
RTP and associated SCS or APS. However, new provisions of CEQA would incentivize, through
streamlining and other provisions, qualified projects that are consistent with an approved SCS or APS
and categorized as "transit priority projects."
Assembly Bill 939, Assembly Bill 341, and Senate Bill 1374. Assembly Bill 939 (AB 939) requires that
each jurisdiction in California to divert at least 50 percent of its waste away from landfills, whether
through waste reduction, recycling or other means. AB 341 requires at least 75 percent of generated
waste be source reduced, recycled, or composted by the year 2020. Senate Bill 1374 (SB 1374)
requires the California Integrated Waste Management Board to adopt a model ordinance by March 1,
2004 suitable for adoption by any local agency to require 50 to 75 percent diversion of construction
and demolition of waste materials from landfills.
Executive Order S-13-08. Executive Order S-13-08 indicates that "climate change in California during
the next century is expected to shift precipitation patterns, accelerate sea level rise and increase
temperatures, thereby posing a serious threat to California's economy, to the health and welfare of its
population and to its natural resources." Pursuant to the requirements in the order, the 2009 California
Climate Adaptation Strategy (California Natural Resource Agency 2009) was adopted, which is the "...
first statewide, multi -sector, region -specific, and information -based climate change in California,
identifying and exploring strategies to adapt to climate change, and specifying a direction for future
research.
Executive Order B-30-15. Executive Order B-30-15, establishing a new interim statewide greenhouse
gas emission reduction target to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by
2030, was signed by Governor Brown in April 2015.
Executive Order B-29-15. Executive Order B-29-15, mandates a statewide 25% reduction in potable
water usage and was signed into law on April 1, 2015.
Executive Order B-37-16. Executive Order B-37-16, continuing the State's adopted water reduction,
was signed into law on May 9, 2016. The water reduction builds off the mandatory 25% reduction
called for in EO B-29-15.
Executive Order N-79-20. Executive Order N-79-20 was signed into law on September 23, 2020 and
mandates 100 percent of in-state sales of new passenger cars and trucks be zero -emission by 2035;
100 percent of medium- and heavy-duty vehicles in the state be zero -emission vehicles by 2045 for all
23
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
operations where feasible and by 2035 for drayage trucks; and to transition to 100 percent zero -
emission off-road vehicles and equipment by 2035 where feasible.
2.2.4 South Coast Air Quality Management District
The Project is within the Salton Sea Air Basin, which is under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air
Quality Management District (SCAQMD). SCAQMD Regulation XXVII currently includes three rules:
• The purpose of Rule 2700 is to define terms and post global warming potentials.
• The purpose of Rule 2701, SoCal Climate Solutions Exchange, is to establish a voluntary program to
encourage, quantify, and certify voluntary, high quality certified greenhouse gas emission
reductions in the SCAQMD.
• Rule 2702, Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program, was adopted on February 6, 2009. The purpose of
this rule is to create a Greenhouse Gas Reduction Program for greenhouse gas emission reductions
in the SCAQMD. The SCAQMD will fund projects through contracts in response to requests for
proposals or purchase reductions from other parties.
SCAQMD Threshold Development
The SCAQMD has established recommended significance thresholds for greenhouse gases for local lead
agency consideration ("SCAQMD draft local agency threshold"). SCAQMD has published a five -tiered
draft GHG threshold which includes a 10,000 metric ton of CO2e per year for stationary/industrial
sources and 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year significance threshold for residential/commercial
projects (South Coast Air Quality Management District 2010c). Tier 3 is anticipated to be the primary
tier by which the SCAQMD will determine significance for projects. The Tier 3 screening level for
stationary sources is based on an emission capture rate of 90 percent for all new or modified projects.
A 90-precent emission capture rate means that 90 percent of total emissions from all new or modified
stationary source projects would be subject to CEQA analysis. The 90 -percent capture rate GHG
significance screening level in Tier 3 for stationary sources was derived using the SCAQMD's annual
Emissions Reporting Program.
The current draft thresholds consist of the following tiered approach:
• Tier 1 consists of evaluating whether or not the project qualifies for any applicable exemption
under CEQA.
• Tier 2 consists of determining whether or not the project is consistent with a greenhouse gas
reduction plan. If a project is consistent with a qualifying local greenhouse gas reduction plan, it
does not have significant greenhouse gas emissions.
• Tier 3 consists of screening values, which the lead agency can choose but must be consistent. A
project's construction emissions are averaged over 30 years and are added to a project's
operational emissions. If a project's emissions are under one of the following screening thresholds,
then the project is less than significant:
— All land use types: 3,000 MTCO2e per year
24
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
— Based on land use types: residential is 3,500 MTCO2e per year; commercial is 1,400 MTCO2e
per year; and mixed use is 3,000 MTCO2e per year
• Tier 4 has the following options:
— Option 1: Reduce emissions from business as usual by a certain percentage; this percentage is
currently undefined
— Option 2: Early implementation of applicable AB 32 Scoping Plan measures
— Option 3: Year 2020 target for service populations (SP), which includes residents and
employees: 4.8 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 6.6 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans;
— Option 3, 2035 target: 3.0 MTCO2e/SP/year for projects and 4.1 MTCO2e/SP/year for plans
• Tier 5 involves mitigation offsets to achieve target significance threshold.
2.2.5 Local
County of Riverside Climate Action Plan
The County of Riverside's Climate Action Plan Update (CAP) was completed in November 2019. The
CAP Update describes Riverside County's GHG emissions for the year 2017, projects how these
emissions will increase into 2020, 2030, and 2050, and includes strategies to reduce emissions to a
level consistent with the State of California's emissions reduction targets. The CAP Update sets a target
to reduce community -wide GHG emission emissions by 15 percent from 2008 levels by 2020, 49
percent by 2030, and 83 percent by 2050.
Appendix D of the Riverside County CAP Update also states that project's that do not exceed the CAP's
screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year are considered to have less than significant GHG
emissions and are in compliance with the County's CAP Update. Therefore, to determine whether the
project's GHG emissions are significant, this analysis uses the County of Riverside CAP Update
screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year for all land use types. Projects that do not exceed
emissions of 3,000 MTCO2e per year are also required to include the following efficiency measures:
• Energy efficiency matching or exceeding the Title 24 requirements in effect as of January 2017,
and
• Water conservation measures that matches the California Green Building Code in effect as of
January 2017.
Projects that exceed emissions of 3,000 MTCO2e per year are also required to use Screening Tables.
Projects that garner at least 100 points will be consistent with the reduction quantities anticipated in
the County's CAP Update. Consistent with CEQA Guidelines, such projects would be determined to
have a less than significant individual and cumulative impact for GHG emissions. Those projects that do
not garner 100 points using the Screening Tables will need to provide additional analysis to determine
the significance of GHG emissions.
In order to meet the state-wide efficiency metric targets, the CAP must demonstrate that it can reduce
community -wide emissions to 6.6 MT CO2e/SP (or 944,737 MT CO2e total based on an estimated 2020
25
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Regulatory Framework and Background
service population of 143,142) by 2020 and 4.4 MT CO2e/SP (or 1,334,243 MT CO2e based on an
estimated 2030 service population of 303,237) by 2030.
Therefore, to determine whether the project's GHG emissions are significant, this analysis uses the
County of Riverside CAP Update and SCAQMD draft local agency tier 3 screening threshold of 3,000
MTCO2e.
The project will be subject to the latest requirements of the California Green Building and Title 24
Energy Efficiency Standards (currently 2019) which would reduce project -related greenhouse gas
emissions.
26
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Setting
3.0 Setting
3.1 Existing Physical Setting
The project site is located in the City of La Quinta within the County of Riverside, which is part of the
Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB). The middle part of Riverside County (between San Gorgonio Pass and
Joshua Tree National Monument), belongs in the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), along with Imperial
County. The SSAB portion of Riverside County is separated from the South Coast Air Basin region by
the San Jacinto Mountains and from the Mojave Desert Air Basin to the east by the Little San
Bernardino Mountains.
3.1.1 Local Climate and Meteorology
During the summer, the SSAB is generally influenced by a Pacific Subtropical High Cell that sits off the
coast, inhibiting cloud formation and encouraging daytime solar heating. The SSAB is rarely influenced
by cold air masses moving south from Canada and Alaska, as these systems are weak and diffuse by the
time they reach the desert. Most desert moisture arrives from infrequent warm, moist, and unstable
air masses from the south. The SSAB averages between three and seven inches of precipitation per
yea r.
The Coachella Valley is a geographically and meteorologically unique area wholly contained within the
Salton Sea Air Basin. The region is currently impacted by significant air pollution levels caused by the
transport of pollutants from coastal air basins to the west, primarily ozone, and locally generated
PM10. The mountains surrounding the region isolate the Valley from coastal influences and create a
hot and dry low-lying desert (see Table 3). As the desert heats up it draws cooler coastal air through
the narrow San Gorgonio Pass, generating strong and sustained winds that cross the fluvial (water
caused) and aeolian (wind) erosion zones in the Valley. These strong winds suspend and transport
large quantities of sand and dust, reducing visibility, damaging property, and constituting a significant
health threat.
The temperature and precipitation levels for the City of Palm Springs, closest monitoring station to the
project site, are in Table 3. Table 3 shows that July is typically the warmest month and December is
typically the coolest month. Rainfall in the project area varies considerably in both time and space.
Almost all the annual rainfall comes from the fringes of mid -latitude storms from late November to
early April, with summers being almost completely dry.
<Table 3, next page>
27
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
Table 3: Meteorological Summary
Month
Average High
Temperature (°F)
Average Low
Average Precipitation
(inches)
January
69.6
42.1
1.14
February
73.6
45.3
1.02
March
79.4
48.6
0.59
April
86.9
54
0.17
May
94.4
60.2
0.05
June
103.1
66.7
0.06
July
108.3
74.8
0.2
August
106.9
74.2
0.3
September
101.8
67.9
0.34
October
91.6
59.2
0.26
November
78.7
48.8
0.47
December
70.1
42.1
0.93
Annual Average
88.7
57
5.53
Notes:
'Source: https://wrcc.dri.edu/cgi-bin/cliMAIN.pI?caplms+sca
3.1.2 Local Air Quality
The SCAQMD is divided into 38 air -monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station
representative of each area. The project site is located in the City of La Quinta within the County of
Riverside in the Coachella Valley (Area 30). The nearest air monitoring station to the project site is the
Palm Springs - Fire Station (Palm Springs Station) approximately 18 miles northwest of the site.
However, this location does not provide all ambient weather data. Therefore, additional data was
pulled from the SCAQMD historical data for the Coachella Valley Area (Area 30) for both sulfur dioxide
and carbon monoxide to provide the existing levels. Table 4 presents the monitored pollutant levels
within the vicinity. However, it should be noted that due to the air monitoring station distance from
the project site, recorded air pollution levels at the air monitoring station reflect with varying degrees
of accuracy, local air quality conditions at the project site.
<Table 4, next page>
28
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
Table 4: Local Area Air Quality Levels from Palm Springs Air Monitoring Station'
The monitoring data presented in Table 4 shows that ozone is the air pollutant of primary concern in
the project area, which are detailed below.
Ozone
During the 2018 to 2020 monitoring period, the State 1 -hour concentration standard for ozone has
been exceeded between five and eleven days each year at the Palm Springs Station. The State 8 -hour
ozone standard has been exceeded between 39 and 58 days each year over the past three years at the
Palm Springs Station. The Federal 8 -hour ozone standard has been exceeded between 34 and 56 days
each year over the past three years at the Palm Springs Station.
29
Year
Pollutant (Standard)'
20181
2019
2020
Ozone:
Maximum 1 -Hour Concentration (ppm)
0.111
0.100
0.119
Days > CAAQS (0.09 ppm)
11
5
9
Maximum 8 -Hour Concentration (ppm)
0.099
0.084
0.094
Days > NAAQS (0.07 ppm)
56
34
49
Days > CAAQS (0.070 ppm)
58
39
53
Carbon Monoxide:
Maximum 1 -Hour Concentration (ppm)
1.1
1.3
0.8
Days > NAAQS (20 ppm)
0
0
0
Maximum 8 -Hour Concentration (ppm)
0.8
0.7
0.5
Days > NAAQS (9 ppm)
0
0
0
Nitrogen Dioxide:
Maximum 1 -Hour Concentration (ppm)
0.043
0.041
0.047
Days > NAAQS (0.25 ppm)
0
0
0
Sulfur Dioxide:'
Maximum 1 -Hour Concentration (ppm)
-
-
-
Days > CAAQS (0.25 ppm)
-
-
-
Inhalable Particulates (PM10):
Maximum 24 -Hour Concentration (ug/m')
422.3
75.6
129.8
Days > NAAQS (150 ug/m3)
2
0
Days > CAAQS (50 ug/m3)
0
6
Annual Average (ug/m3)
22.9
20.7
23.2
Annual > NAAQS (50 ug/m3)
No
No
No
Annual > CAAQS (20 ug/m3)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Ultra -Fine Particulates (PM2.5):
Maximum 24 -Hour Concentration (ug/m3)
30.2
15.5
23.9
Days > NAAQS (35 ug/m3)
0
0
0
Annual Average (ug/m3)
6
6
6.4
Annual > NAAQS (15 ug/m3)
No
No
No
Annual > CAAQS (12 ug/m3)
No
No
No
1 Source: obtained from https://www.agmd.gov/home/air-quality/air-quality-data-studies/historical-data-by-year and /or
https://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/topfour/topfourl.php.
Z CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standard; NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standard; ppm = parts per million
3 No data available.
The monitoring data presented in Table 4 shows that ozone is the air pollutant of primary concern in
the project area, which are detailed below.
Ozone
During the 2018 to 2020 monitoring period, the State 1 -hour concentration standard for ozone has
been exceeded between five and eleven days each year at the Palm Springs Station. The State 8 -hour
ozone standard has been exceeded between 39 and 58 days each year over the past three years at the
Palm Springs Station. The Federal 8 -hour ozone standard has been exceeded between 34 and 56 days
each year over the past three years at the Palm Springs Station.
29
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
Ozone is a secondary pollutant as it is not directly emitted. Ozone is the result of chemical reactions
between other pollutants, most importantly hydrocarbons and NO2, which occur only in the presence
of bright sunlight. Pollutants emitted from upwind cities react during transport downwind to produce
the oxidant concentrations experienced in the area. Many areas of the SCAQMD contribute to the
ozone levels experienced at the monitoring station, with the more significant areas being those directly
upwind.
Carbon Monoxide
CO is another important pollutant that is due mainly to motor vehicles. During the 2018 to 2020
monitoring period, the Federal 1 -hour and 8 -hour concentration standards for CO were not exceeded.
Nitrogen Dioxide
During the 2018 to 2020 monitoring period, the Federal 1 -hour concentration standard for Nitrogen
Dioazide has not been exceeded.
Sulfur Dioxide
The Coachella Valley Area did not have SO2 data available for the last three years.
Particulate Matter
During the 2018 to 2020 monitoring period, the Palm Springs Station recorded two days of exceedance
of the Federal 24-hour PM10 concentration standard and an exceedance in the State PM10annual
average standard.
During the same period, the Palm Springs Station did not record an exceedance of the Federal 24-hour
standard for PM2.5.
According to the EPA, some people are much more sensitive than others to breathing fine particles
(PM10 and PM2.5). People with influenza, chronic respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, and the
elderly may suffer worsening illness and premature death due to breathing these fine particles. People
with bronchitis can expect aggravated symptoms from breathing in fine particles. Children may
experience decline in lung function due to breathing in PM10 and PM2.5. Other groups considered
sensitive are smokers and people who cannot breathe well through their noses. Exercising athletes are
also considered sensitive, because many breathe through their mouths during exercise.
3.1.3 Attainment Status
The EPA and the ARB designate air basins where ambient air quality standards are exceeded as
"nonattainment" areas. If standards are met, the area is designated as an "attainment" area. If there is
inadequate or inconclusive data to make a definitive attainment designation, they are considered
"unclassified." National nonattainment areas are further designated as marginal, moderate, serious,
severe, or extreme as a function of deviation from standards. Each standard has a different definition,
or 'form' of what constitutes attainment, based on specific air quality statistics. For example, the
Federal 8 -hour CO standard is not to be exceeded more than once per year; therefore, an area is in
30
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
attainment of the CO standard if no more than one 8 -hour ambient air monitoring values exceeds the
threshold per year. In contrast, the federal annual PM2.5 standard is met if the three-year average of
the annual average PM2.5 concentration is less than or equal to the standard. Table 5 lists the
attainment status for the criteria pollutants in the basin.
Table 5: Coachella Valley Portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin Attainment Status
31
Nationali
Pollutant
Averaging Time
Standards
Attainment Date z
California Standards 2
1979
1 -Hour
Attainment
11/15/2007
Nonattainment
(0.12 ppm)
(Attained 12/31/2013)
1 -Hour Ozone'
1 -Hour (0.09 ppm)
Nonattainment
2015
8 -Hour
Pending - Expect
Pending
Nonattainment
8 -Hour Ozone'
(0.070 ppm)
Nonattainment (Severe)
2008
8 -Hour
Nonattainment
7/20/2027
8 -Hour Ozone°
(0.075 ppm)
(Severe -15)
1997
8 -Hour
Nonattainment
6/15/2019
8 -Hour Ozone°
(0.08 ppm)
(Severe -15)
1 -Hour (20 ppm)
8 -hour (9.0 ppm)
_
Attainment
CO
1 -Hour (35 ppm)
Unclassifiable/
N/A (attained)
8 -Hour (9 ppm)
Attainment
1 -hour (0.18 ppm) Annual
(0.03 ppm)
Attainment
NOz'
1 -Hour (100 ppb)
Unclassifiable/
N/A (attained)
Annual (0.053 ppm)
Attainment
1 -Hour (0.25 ppm)
24 -Hour (0.04 ppm)
Attainment
S02$
1 -Hour (75 ppb)
Designations Pending
N/A
24 -Hour (0.14 ppm)
Unclassifiable/
Unclassifiable/Attainment
Annual (0.03 ppm)
Attainment
24 -Hour (50 µg/m3) Annual
(20 50 Vg/m3)
Nonattainment
PM106
24 -Hour
Nonattainment
12/31/2006
(150 µg/m3)
(Serious)
Annual (12.0 µg/m3)
-
Attainment
PM2.55
24 -Hour (35 µg/m3)
Unclassifiable/
N/A (attained)
Attainment
Lead
3 -Months Rolling
Unclassifiable/
Unclassifiable/Attainment
Attainment
(0.15 µg/m3)
Attainment
N otes:
'Obtained from 2016 AQMP, SCAQMD, 2016. EPA often only declares Nonattainment areas; everywhere else is listed as Unclassified/Attainment or
Unclassifiable.
z A design value below the NAAQS for data through the full year or smog season prior to the attainment date is typically required for attainment
demonstration.
3 The 1979 1 -hour ozone NAAQS (0.12 ppm) was revoked, effective 6/15/05; the Southeast Desert Modified Air Quality Management Area, including the
Coachella Valley, had not timely attained this standard by the 11/15/07 "severe -17" deadline, based on 2005-2007 data; on 8/25/14, U.S. EPA proposed
a clean data finding based on 2011-2013 data and a determination of attainment for the former 1 -hour ozone NAAQS for the Southeast Desert
nonattainment area; this rule was finalized by U.S. EPA on 4/15/15, effective 5/15/15, and included preliminary 2014 data
° The 2008 8 -hour ozone NAAQS (0.075 ppm) was revised to 0.070 ppm, effective 12/28/15 with classifications and implementation goals to be finalized
by 10/1/17; the 1997 8 -hour ozone NAAQS (0.08 ppm) was revoked in the 2008 ozone NAAQS implementation rule, effective 4/6/15; there are
continuing obligations under the 1997 and 2008 ozone NAAQS until they are attained
5The annual PM2.5 standard was revised on 1/15/13, effective 3/18/13, from 15 to 12 µg/m3
6 The annual PM10 standard was revoked, effective 12/18/06; the 24-hour PM10 NAAQS attainment deadline was 12/31/2006; the Coachella Valley
Attainment Re -designation Request and PM10 Maintenance Plan was postponed by U.S. EPA pending additional monitoring and analysis in the
southeastern Coachella Valley
' New 1 -hour NO2 NAAQS became effective 8/2/10; attainment designations 1/20/12; annual NO2 NAAQS retained
8 The 1971 Annual and 24-hour S02 NAAQS were revoked, effective 8/23/10; however, these 1971 standards will remain in effect until one year after
U.S. EPA promulgates area designations for the 2010 S02 1 -hour standard; final area designations expected by 12/31/2020 with SSAB expected to be
designated Unclassifiable/Attainment
31
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Setting
3.2 Greenhouse Gases
Constituent gases of the Earth's atmosphere, called atmospheric greenhouse gases (GHG), play a
critical role in the Earth's radiation amount by trapping infrared radiation emitted from the Earth's
surface, which otherwise would have escaped to space. Prominent greenhouse gases contributing to
this process include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), ozone, water vapor, nitrous oxide (N20), and
chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs). This phenomenon, known as the Greenhouse Effect, is responsible for
maintaining a habitable climate. Anthropogenic (caused or produced by humans) emissions of these
greenhouse gases in excess of natural ambient concentrations are responsible for the enhancement of
the Greenhouse Effect and have led to a trend of unnatural warming of the Earth's natural climate,
known as global warming or climate change. Emissions of gases that induce global warming are
attributable to human activities associated with industrial/manufacturing, agriculture, utilities,
transportation, and residential land uses. Transportation is responsible for 41 percent of the State's
greenhouse gas emissions, followed by electricity generation. Emissions of CO2 and nitrous oxide (NO2)
are byproducts of fossil fuel combustion. Methane, a potent greenhouse gas, results from off -gassing
associated with agricultural practices and landfills. Sinks of CO2, where CO2 is stored outside of the
atmosphere, include uptake by vegetation and dissolution into the ocean. Table 6 provides a
description of each of the greenhouse gases and their global warming potential.
Additional information is available: https://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/data/data.htm
<Table 6, next page>
32
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Setting
Table 6: Description of Greenhouse Gases
Greenhouse Gas
Description and Physical Properties
Sources
Microbial processes in soil and water,
fuel combustion, and industrial
Nitrous oxide (N20),also known as laughing gas is a
processes. In addition to agricultural
Nitrous oxide
colorless gas. It has a lifetime of 114 years. Its global
industrial
warming potential is 298.
sources, some processes
(nylon production, nitric acid
production) also emit N20.
A natural source of CH4 is from the
decay of organic matter. Methane is
Methane (CH4) is a flammable gas and is the main
extracted from geological deposits
Methane
component of natural gas. It has a lifetime of 12 years.
(natural gas fields). Other sources are
Its global warming potential is 25.
from the decay of organic material in
landfills, fermentation of manure, and
cattle farming.
Natural sources include decomposition
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is an odorless, colorless, natural
of dead organic matter; respiration of
greenhouse gas. Carbon dioxide's global warming
bacteria, plants, animals, and fungus;
Carbon dioxide
potential is 1. The concentration in 2005 was 379 parts
evaporation from oceans; and volcanic
per million (ppm), which is an increase of about 1.4
outgassing. Anthropogenic sources are
ppm per year since 1960.
from burning coal, oil, natural gas, and
wood.
CFCs are nontoxic, nonflammable, insoluble, and
Chlorofluorocarbons were synthesized
chemically unreactive in the troposphere (the level of
in 1928 for use as refrigerants, aerosol
air at the earth's surface). They are gases formed
propellants, and cleaning solvents. They
Chlorofluorocarbons
synthetically by replacing all hydrogen atoms in
methane or methane with chlorine and/or fluorine
destroy stratospheric ozone, therefore
atoms. Global warming potentials range from 3,800 to
their production was stopped as
required by the Montreal Protocol.
8,100.
Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) are a group of greenhouse
Hydrofluorocarbons are synthetic
gases containing carbon, chlorine, and at least one
manmade chemicals used as a
Hydrofluorocarbons
substitute for chlorofluorocarbons in
hydrogen atom. Global warming potentials range from
applications such as automobile air
140 to 11,700.
conditioners and refrigerants.
Perfluorocarbons (PFCs) have stable molecular
structures and only break down by ultraviolet rays
Two main sources of perfluorocarbons
Perfluorocarbons
about 60 kilometers above the Earth's surface. They
are primary aluminum production and
have a lifetime 10,000 to 50,000 years. They have a
semiconductor manufacturing.
global warming potential range of 6,200 to 9,500.
Sulfur hexafluoride (SFe) is an inorganic, odorless,
This gas is manmade and used for
insulation in electric power transmission
Sulfur
colorless, and nontoxic, nonflammable gas. It has a
equipment, in the magnesium industry,
hexafluoride
lifetime of 3,200 years. It has a high global warming
in semiconductor manufacturing, and as
potential, 23,900.
a tracer gas for leak detection.
Notes:
1. Sources: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014a and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2014b.
https://www.ipcc.ch/publications and data/ar4/wg1/en/ch2s2-10-2.html
33
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Modeling Parameters and Assumptions
4.0 Modeling Parameters and Assumptions
4.1 Construction
Typical emission rates from construction activities were obtained from CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0
CalEEMod is a computer model published by the SCAQMD for estimating air pollutant emissions. The
CalEEMod program uses the EMFAC2017 computer program to calculate the emission rates specific for
the southwestern portion of Riverside County for construction -related employee vehicle trips and the
OFFROAD2011 computer program to calculate emission rates for heavy truck operations. EMFAC2017
and OFFROAD2011 are computer programs generated by CARB that calculates composite emission
rates for vehicles. Emission rates are reported by the program in grams per trip and grams per mile or
grams per running hour. Using CalEEMod, the peak daily air pollutant emissions were calculated and
presented below. These emissions represent the highest level of emissions for each of the construction
phases in terms of air pollutant emissions.
The analysis assesses the emissions associated with the construction of the proposed project as
indicated in Table 1. The project was analyzed to be operational in 2023; therefore, construction is
estimated to start no sooner than the first quarter of 2022 and be completed by 2023. The phases of
the construction activities which have been analyzed below are: 1) site preparation, 2) grading, 3)
building, 4) paving, and 5) architectural coating. For details on construction modeling and construction
equipment for each phase, please see Appendix A.
The project will be required to comply with existing SCAQMD rules for the reduction of fugitive dust
emissions. SCAQMD Rule 403 establishes these procedures. Compliance with this rule is achieved
through application of standard best management practices in construction and operation activities,
such as application of water or chemical stabilizers to disturbed soils, managing haul road dust by
application of water, covering haul vehicles, restricting vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to 15 mph,
sweeping loose dirt from paved site access roadways, cessation of construction activity when winds
exceed 25 mph and establishing a permanent, stabilizing ground cover on finished sites. In addition,
projects that disturb 50 acres or more of soil or move 5,000 cubic yards of materials per day are
required to submit a Fugitive Dust Control Plan or a Large Operation Notification Form to SCAQMD.
Based on the size of the Project area (approximately 14.57 acres) and the fact that the project won't
export more than 5,000 cubic yards of material a day a Fugitive Dust Control Plan or Large Operation
Notification would not be required.
SCAQMD's Rule 403 minimum requirements require that the application of the best available dust
control measures are used for all grading operations and include the application of water or other soil
stabilizers in sufficient quantity to prevent the generation of visible dust plumes. Compliance with Rule
403 would require the use of water trucks during all phases where earth moving operations would
occur. Compliance with Rule 403 is required.
34
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Modeling Parameters and Assumptions
4.2 Operations
Operational or long-term emissions occur over the life of the Project. Both mobile and area sources
generate operational emissions. Area source emissions arise from consumer product usage, heaters
that consume natural gas, gasoline -powered landscape equipment, and architectural coatings
(painting). Mobile source emissions from motor vehicles are the largest single long-term source of air
pollutants from the operation of the Project. Small amounts of emissions would also occur from area
sources such as the consumption of natural gas for heating, hearths, from landscaping emissions, and
consumer product usage. The operational emissions were estimated using the latest version of
CalEEMod.
Mobile Sources
Mobile sources include emissions from the additional vehicle miles generated from the proposed
project. The vehicle trips associated with the proposed project are based upon the trip generation
rates give in the Traffic Scoping Agreement (Integrated Engineering Group) which uses the ITE 10th Trip
Generation Manual.
The program then applies the emission factors for each trip which is provided by the EMFAC2017
model to determine the vehicular traffic pollutant emissions. The CalEEMod default trip lengths were
used in this analysis. Please see CalEEMod output comments sections in Appendix A and B for details.
Area Sources
Area sources include emissions from consumer products, landscape equipment and architectural
coatings. Landscape maintenance includes fuel combustion emissions from equipment such as lawn
mowers, rototillers, shredders/grinders, blowers, trimmers, chain saws, and hedge trimmers, as well as
air compressors, generators, and pumps. As specifics were not known about the landscaping
equipment fleet, CalEEMod defaults were used to estimate emissions from landscaping equipment.
Per SCAQMD Rule 1113 as amended on June 3, 2011, the architectural coatings that would be applied
after January 1, 2014 will be limited to an average of 50 grams per liter or less for buildings and 100
grams per liter or less for parking lot striping; however, no changes were made to the CalEEMod
architectural coating default values.
Energy Usage
2020.4.0 CalEEMod defaults were utilized.
4.3 Localized Construction Analysis
The SCAQMD has published a "Fact Sheet for Applying CalEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds"
(South Coast Air Quality Management District 2011b). CalEEMod calculates construction emissions
based on the number of equipment hours and the maximum daily disturbance activity possible for
each piece of equipment. In order to compare CalEEMod reported emissions against the localized
significance threshold lookup tables, the CEQA document should contain in its project design features
or its mitigation measures the following parameters:
35
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Modeling Parameters and Assumptions
1. The off-road equipment list (including type of equipment, horsepower, and hours of operation)
assumed for the day of construction activity with maximum emissions.
2. The maximum number of acres disturbed on the peak day.
3. Any emission control devices added onto off-road equipment.
4. Specific dust suppression techniques used on the day of construction activity with maximum
emissions.
The construction equipment showing the equipment associated with the maximum area of disturbance
is shown in Table 7.
Table 7: Construction Equipment Assumptions'
Activity
Equipment
Number
Acres/81hr-day
Total Acres
Site Preparation
Rubber Tired Dozers
3
0.5
1.5
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 4 0.5
2.0
Total Per Phase
3.5
Excavators
2
0.5
1.0
Graders
1
0.5
0.5
Grading
Rubber Tired Dozers
1
0.5
0.5
Scrapers
2
0.5
1.0
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1
2
1 0.5 1
1.0
Total Per Phase
4.0
Notes:
1 Source: CaIEEMod output and South Coast AQMD, Fact Sheet for Applying CaIEEMod to Localized Significance Thresholds.
http://www.agmd.gov/docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/localized-significance-thresholds/caleemod-guidance.pdf?sfvrsn=2
As shown in Table 7, the maximum number of acres disturbed in a day would be 4.0 acres during
grading.
The local air quality emissions from construction were analyzed using the SCAQMD's Mass Rate
Localized Significant Threshold Look -up Tables and the methodology described in Localized Significance
Threshold Methodology, prepared by SCAQMD, revised July 2008. The Look -up Tables were developed
by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from
the proposed project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. The emission
thresholds were based on the Coachella Valley source receptor area (SRA 30) and a disturbance of 4
acres per day at a distance of 25 meters (82 feet). As there is no threshold for a 4 -acre disturbance,
interpolation can be used between the 2 -acre and 5 -acre thresholds.
4.4 Localized Operational Analysis
For operational emissions, the screening tables for a disturbance area of 4 acres per day and a distance
of 25 meters were used to determine significance. The tables were compared to the project's onsite
operational emissions.
36
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Thresholds of Significance
5.0 Thresholds of Significance
5.1 Air Quality Thresholds of Significance
5.1.1 CEQA Guidelines for Air Quality
The CEQA Guidelines define a significant effect on the environment as "a substantial, or potentially
substantial, adverse change in the environment." To determine if a project would have a significant
impact on air quality, the type, level, and impact of emissions generated by the project must be
evaluated.
The following air quality significance thresholds are contained in Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines. A
significant impact would occur if the project would:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan;
b) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is nonattainment under an applicable national or state ambient air quality standard;
c) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations; or
d) Result in other emissions (such as those leading to odors) adversely affecting a substantial
number of people.
While the final determination of whether a project is significant is within the purview of the Lead
Agency pursuant to Section 15064(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, SCAQMD recommends that its
quantitative air pollution thresholds be used to determine the significance of project emissions. If the
Lead Agency finds that the project has the potential to exceed these air pollution thresholds, the
project should be considered to have significant air quality impacts. There are daily emission
thresholds for construction and operation of a proposed project in the basin.
5.1.2 Regional Significance Thresholds for Construction Emissions
The following CEQA significance thresholds for construction emissions are established for the Basin:
0 75 pounds per day (lbs/day) of VOC • 150 lbs/day of PM10
• 100 lbs/day of NOX • 55 lbs/day of PM2.5
• 550 lbs/day of CO • 150 lbs/day of SO2
Projects in the basin with construction -related emissions that exceed any of the emission thresholds
are considered to be significant under SCAQMD guidelines.
37
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Thresholds of Significance
5.1.3 Regional Significance Thresholds for Operational Emissions
The daily operational emissions significance thresholds for the basin are as follows:
• 55 pounds per day (lbs/day) of VOC • 150 lbs/day of PM10
• 55 lbs/day of NO,, • 55 lbs/day of PM2.5
• 550 lbs/day of CO • 150 lbs/day of SO2
Local Microscale Concentration Standards The significance of localized project impacts under CEQA
depends on whether ambient CO levels in the vicinity of the project are above or below State and
federal CO standards. If ambient levels are below the standards, a project is considered to have a
significant impact if project emissions result in an exceedance of one or more of these standards. If
ambient levels already exceed a State or federal standard, project emissions are considered significant
if they increase 1 -hour CO concentrations by 1.0 ppm or more or 8 -hour CO concentrations by 0.45
ppm or more. The following are applicable local emission concentration standards for CO:
• California State 1 -hour CO standard of 20.0 ppm
• California State 8 -hour CO standard of 9.0 ppm
5.1.4 Thresholds for Localized Significance
Project -related construction air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air
quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant
enough to create a regional impact to the Salton Sea Air Basin. In order to assess local air quality
impacts the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significant Thresholds (LSTs) to assess the project -
related air emissions in the project vicinity. The SCAQMD has also provided Final Localized Significant
Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), June 2003, which details the methodology to analyze local
air emission impacts. The Localized Significant Threshold Methodology found that the primary
emissions of concern are NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5.
The emission thresholds were calculated based on the Perris Valley source receptor area (SRA 30) and
a disturbance of 4 acres per day at a distance of 25 meters (82 feet), for construction and 4 acres a day
for screening of localized operational emissions. The 4 -acre thresholds are interpolated from the 2 -acre
and 5 -acre thresholds.
5.2 Greenhouse Gas Thresholds of Significance
5.2.1 CEQA Guidelines for Greenhouse Gas
CEQA Guidelines define a significant effect on the environment as "a substantial, or potentially
substantial, adverse change in the environment." To determine if a project would have a significant
impact on greenhouse gases, the type, level, and impact of emissions generated by the project must be
evaluated.
38
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Thresholds of Significance
The following greenhouse gas significance thresholds are contained in Appendix G
of the CEQA Guidelines, which were amendments adopted into the Guidelines on
March 18, 2010, pursuant to SB 97. A significant impact would occur if the project would:
(a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant
impact on the environment; or
(b) Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of
reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.
However, despite this, currently neither the CEQA statutes, OPR guidelines, nor the draft proposed
changes to the CEQA Guidelines prescribe thresholds of significance or a particular methodology for
performing an impact analysis; as with most environmental topics, significance criteria are left to the
judgment and discretion of the Lead Agency. As previously discussed (Section 2.2.4 of this report),
SCAQMD has drafted interim GHG thresholds and the County of Riverside CAP Update has adopted a
GHG threshold. The County of Riverside CAP Update screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons per year
of CO2e was used in this analysis.
5.3 Toxic Air Contaminants
The threshold for toxic air contaminants (IACs) has a maximum incremental cancer risk of 10 per
million and a non -cancer (acute and chronic) hazard index of 1.0 or greater. An exceedance to these
values would be considered a significant impact.
39
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
6.0 Air Quality Emissions Impact
6.1 Construction Air Quality Emissions Impact
The latest version of CalEEMod was used to estimate the onsite and offsite construction emissions. The
emissions incorporate Rule 402 and 403. Rule 402 and 403 (fugitive dust) are not considered mitigation
measures as the project by default is required to incorporate these rules during construction.
6.1.1 Regional Construction Emissions
The construction emissions for the project would not exceed the SCAQMD's daily emission thresholds
at the regional level as demonstrated in Table 8, and therefore would be considered less than
significant.
Table 8: Regional Significance - Construction Emissions (pounds/day)
Activity
VOC
Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)
NOx CO SO2 PM10
PM2.5
Site Preparation
On -Site'
3.17
33.08
19.70
0.04
9.28
5.42
Off -Site'
0.06
0.04
0.56
0.00
0.15
0.04
Total
3.23
33.12
20.26
0.04
9.43
1 5.46
Grading
On-Site2
3.62
38.84
29.04
0.06
5.22
2.93
Off-Site3
0.07
0.04
0.62
0.00
0.17
0.05
Total
3.69
38.89
29.66
0.06
5.39
2.97
Building Construction
On-Site2
1.71
15.62
16.36
0.03
0.81
0.76
Off-Site3
1.55
5.06
14.23
0.05
4.06
1.14
Total
3.26
20.68
30.60
0.07
4.87
1.90
Paving
On-Site2
1.51
10.19
14.58
0.02
0.51
0.47
Off-Site3
0.05
0.03
0.43
0.00
0.13
0.03
Total
1.56
10.22
15.01
0.02
0.64
0.50
Architectural Coating
On-Site2
63.31
1.30
1.81
0.00
0.07
0.07
Off -Site'
0.26
0.15
2.34
0.01
0.69
0.19
Total
63.56
1.46
4.16
0.01
0.76
0.26
Total of overlapping phases°
10.16 1
28.22
1 35.85
1 0.06 1
2.36
1 1.57
SCAQMD Thresholds
75
100
550
150
150
55
Exceeds Thresholds
No
No
No
No
No
No
Notes:
'Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0
On-site emissions from equipment operated on-site that is not operated on public roads.
s Off-site emissions from equipment operated on public roads.
° Construction, architectural coatings and paving phases may overlap.
M
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
6.1.2 Localized Construction Emissions
The data provided in Table 9 shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local
emissions thresholds at the nearest sensitive receptors. Therefore, a less than significant local air
quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project.
Table 9: Localized Significance — Construction
Phase
On -Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)'
NOx CO PM10 PM2.5
Site Preparation
33.08
19.70
9.28
5.42
Grading
38.84
29.04
5.22
2.93
Building Construction
15.62
16.36
0.81
0.76
Paving
10.19
14.58
0.51
0.47
Architectural Coating
1.30
1.81
0.07
0.07
Total of overlapping phases
27.11
32.76
1.39
1.30
SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet) or Iess2
1 266
1 1,961 1
11.7
1 6.3
Notes:
' Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD's Mass Rate Look -up Tables for four acres in Coachella Valley Source Receptor Area (SRA 30). Project
will disturb a maximum of 4.0 acres per day (see Table 7).
'The nearest sensitive receptor is located ajdacent to the north; therefore, the 25 -meter threshold has been used.
6.1.3 Construction -Related Human Health Impacts
Regarding health effects related to criteria pollutant emissions, the applicable significance thresholds
are established for regional compliance with the state and federal ambient air quality standards, which
are intended to protect public health from both acute and long-term health impacts, depending on the
potential effects of the pollutant. Because regional and local emissions of criteria pollutants during
construction of the project would be below the applicable thresholds, it would not contribute to long-
term health impacts related to nonattainment of the ambient air quality standards. Therefore,
significant adverse acute health impacts as a result of project construction are not anticipated.
6.1.4 Odors
Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of
materials such as asphalt pavement. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the
construction process are of short-term in nature and the odor emissions are expected cease upon the
drying or hardening of the odor producing materials. Diesel exhaust and VOCs would be emitted
during construction of the project, which are objectionable to some; however, emissions would
disperse rapidly from the project site and therefore should not reach an objectionable level at the
nearest sensitive receptors. Due to the short-term nature and limited amounts of odor producing
materials being utilized, no significant impact related to odors would occur during construction of the
proposed project.
The SCAQMD recommends that odor impacts be addressed in a qualitative manner. Such an analysis
shall determine whether the project would result in excessive nuisance odors, as defined under the
41
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Air QualitV Emissions Impact
California Code of Regulations and Section 41700 of the California Health and Safety Code, and thus
would constitute a public nuisance related to air quality.
Potential sources that may emit odors during the on-going operations of the proposed project would
include odor emissions from vehicle emissions. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the
project site and through compliance with SCAQMD's Rule 402 no significant impact related to odors
would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed project.
6.1.5 Construction -Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impact
The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate
emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed project.
The Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) has issued the Air Toxic Hot Spots
Program Risk Assessment Guidelines and Guidance Manual for the Preparation of Health Risk
Assessments, February 2015 to provide a description of the algorithms, recommended exposure
variates, cancer and noncancer health values, and the air modeling protocols needed to perform a
health risk assessment (HRA) under the Air Toxics Hot Spots Information and Assessment Act of 1987.
Hazard identification includes identifying all substances that are evaluated for cancer risk and/or non -
cancer acute, 8 -hour, and chronic health impacts. In addition, identifying any multi -pathway
substances that present a cancer risk or chronic non -cancer hazard via non -inhalation routes of
exposure.
Given the relatively limited number of heavy-duty construction equipment and construction schedule,
the proposed project would not result in a long-term substantial source of toxic air containment
emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk. Furthermore, construction -based particulate
matter (PM) emissions (including diesel exhaust emissions) do not exceed any local or regional
thresholds. Therefore, no significant short-term toxic air contaminant impacts would occur during
construction of the proposed project.
6.2 Operational Air Quality Emissions Impact
6.2.1 Regional Operational Emissions
The operations -related criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed project have been analyzed
through the use of CalEEMod model. The operating emissions were based on year 2023, which is the
anticipated opening year for the project per the Traffic Scoping Agreement (Integrated Engineering
Group). The summer and winter emissions created by the proposed project's long-term operations
were calculated and the highest emissions from either summer or winter are summarized in Table 10.
42
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
Table 10: Regional Significance - Unmitigated Operational Emissions (lbs/day)
Activity
Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)'
PM2.5
voc
NOx
CO SO2 PM10
PM2.5
Area Sources2
6.39
0.27
23.49
0.00
0.13
0.13
Energy Usage
0.13
1.08
0.46
0.01
0.09
0.09
Mobile Sources4
4.67
5.57
37.99
0.08
7.97
2.17
Total Emissions
11.19
6.92
61.94
0.09
8.19
2.39
SCAQMD Thresholds
55
55
550
150
150
55
Exceeds Threshold?
No
No
No
No
No
No
Notes:
' Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0
Z Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment.
a Energy usage consists of emissions from on-site natural gas usage.
4 Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust.
Table 10 provides the project's unmitigated operational emissions. Table 10 shows that the project
does not exceed the SCAQMD daily emission threshold and regional operational emissions are
considered to be less than significant.
6.2.2 Localized Operational Emissions
Table 11 shows the calculated emissions for the proposed operational activities compared with
appropriate LSTs. The LST analysis only includes on-site sources; however, the CalEEMod software
outputs do not separate on-site and off-site emissions for mobile sources. For a worst-case scenario
assessment, the emissions shown in Table 11 include all on-site project -related stationary sources and
10% of the project -related new mobile sources.' This percentage is an estimate of the amount of
project -related new vehicle traffic that will occur on-site.
Table 11: Localized Significance - Unmitigated Operational Emissions
On -Site Emission Source
On -Site Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day)'
NOx co PM10
PM2.5
Area Sources2
0.27
23.49
0.13
0.13
Energy Usage
1.08
0.46
0.09
0.09
On -Site Vehicle Emission S4
0.56
3.80
0.80
0.22
Total Emissions
1.91
27.75
1.01
0.43
SCAQMD Threshold for 25 meters (82 feet)'
266
1,961
3.3
1.7
Exceeds Threshold?
No
No
No
No
Notes:
1 Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD's Mass Rate Look -up
Tables for four acres in Coachella Valley Source Receptor Area (SRA 30).
a The project site is approximately 0.28 miles in length at its longest point; therefore the on-site mobile source emissions represent approximately 1/25th
of the shortest CalEEMod default distance of 6.9 miles. Therefore, to be conservative, 1/10th the distance (dividing the mobile source emissions by 10)
was used to represent the portion of the overall mobile source emissions that would occur on-site.
43
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Air QualitV Emissions Impact
z Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment.
s Energy usage consists of emissions from generation of electricity and on-site natural gas usage.
° On-site vehicular emissions based on 1/10 of the gross vehicular emissions and road dust.
'The nearest sensitive receptor is located adiacent to the north: therefore. the 25 meter threshold has been used.
Table 11 indicates that the local operational emission would not exceed the LST thresholds at the
nearest sensitive receptors, located adjacent to the project. Therefore, the project will not result in
significant Localized Operational emissions.
6.2.3 Operations -Related Human Health Impacts
As stated previously, regarding health effects related to criteria pollutant emissions, the applicable
significance thresholds are established for regional compliance with the state and federal ambient air
quality standards, which are intended to protect public health from both acute and long-term health
impacts, depending on the potential effects of the pollutant. Because regional and local emissions of
criteria pollutants during operation of the project would be below the applicable thresholds, it would
not contribute to long-term health impacts related to nonattainment of the ambient air quality
standards. Therefore, significant adverse acute health impacts as a result of project operation are not
anticipated.
6.3 CO Hot Spot Emissions
CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor
vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a
roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality
impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and
Federal CO standards which were presented in above in Section 5.0.
To determine if the proposed project could cause emission levels in excess of the CO standards
discussed above in Section 5.0, a sensitivity analysis is typically conducted to determine the potential
for CO "hot spots" at a number of intersections in the general project vicinity. Because of reduced
speeds and vehicle queuing, "hot spots" potentially can occur at high traffic volume intersections with
a Level of Service E or worse.
Micro -scale air quality emissions have traditionally been analyzed in environmental documents where
the air basin was a non -attainment area for CO. However, the SCAQMD has demonstrated in the CO
attainment redesignation request to EPA that there are no "hot spots" anywhere in the air basin, even
at intersections with much higher volumes, much worse congestion, and much higher background CO
levels than anywhere in Riverside County. If the worst-case intersections in the air basin have no "hot
spot" potential, any local impacts will be below thresholds.
Traffic analysis from Integrated Engineering Group (2021) showed that the project would generate
1,684 average daily trips. The 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan)
showed that an intersection which has a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day
would not violate the CO standard. The volume of traffic at project buildout would be well below
100,000 vehicles and below the necessary volume to even get close to causing a violation of the CO
Ell
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Air QualitV Emissions Impact
standard. Therefore no CO "hot spot" modeling was performed and no significant long-term air quality
impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on-going use of the proposed project.
6.4 Cumulative Regional Air Quality Impacts
Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the project area.
However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, which
travel well out of the local area. Therefore, from an air quality standpoint, the cumulative analysis
would extend beyond any local projects and when wind patterns are considered, would cover an even
larger area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for the project's air quality must be generic by nature.
The project area is out of attainment for both ozone and PM10 particulate matter. Construction and
operation of cumulative projects will further degrade the local air quality, as well as the air quality of
the Salton Sea Air Basin. The greatest cumulative impact on the quality of regional air cell will be the
incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and
industrial development and the use of heavy equipment and trucks associated with the construction of
these projects. Air quality will be temporarily degraded during construction activities that occur
separately or simultaneously. However, in accordance with the SCAQMD methodology, projects that
do not exceed the SCAQMD criteria or can be mitigated to less than criteria levels are not significant
and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. The project does not exceed any of the thresholds of
significance and therefore is considered less than significant.
6.5 Air Quality Compliance
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a
proposed project and applicable General Plans and Regional Plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125).
The regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the SCAQMD Air Quality Management
Plan (AQMP). Therefore, this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the proposed project
with the AQMP.
The purpose of this discussion is to set forth the issues regarding consistency with the assumptions and
objectives of the AQMP and discuss whether the proposed project would interfere with the region's
ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards. If the decision -makers determine that
the proposed project is inconsistent, the lead agency may consider project modifications or inclusion of
mitigation to eliminate the inconsistency.
The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended General Plan Elements (including land use
zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for
consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required A
proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more
policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key
indicators of consistency:
45
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Air Quality Emissions Impact
(1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air
quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of
air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP.
(2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP in 2016 or increments
based on the year of project buildout and phase.
Both of these criteria are evaluated in the following sections.
A. Criterion 1- Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations
Based on the air quality modeling analysis contained in this Air Analysis in Tables 8 and 9, short-term
construction impacts will not result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD regional and local
thresholds of significance. This Air Analysis also found that, long-term operations impacts will not
result in significant impacts based on the SCAQMD local and regional thresholds of significance, shown
in Tables 10 and 11.
Therefore, the proposed project is not projected to contribute to the exceedance of any air pollutant
concentration standards and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the first criterion.
B. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP?
Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed
project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to ensure that the
analyses conducted for the proposed project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The 2016-
2040 Regional Transportation/Sustainable Communities Strategy, prepared by SCAG, 2016, includes
chapters on: the challenges in a changing region, creating a plan for our future, and the road to greater
mobility and sustainable growth. These chapters currently respond directly to federal and state
requirements placed on SCAG. Local governments are required to use these as the basis of their plans
for purposes of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For this project, the City of La
Quinta General Plan defines the assumptions that are represented in the AQMP.
The proposed project has a current land use classification of Medium High Density Residential
according to the City of La Quinta Official Zoning Map. The proposed project is to develop the site with
a 284 -unit apartment complex. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an inconsistency
with the land use designation in the City's General Plan. Therefore, the proposed project is not
anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the project site and is found to be consistent with the
AQMP for the second criterion.
Based on the above, the proposed project will not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP.
Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur.
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Greenhouse Gas ImpactAnalVsis
7.0 Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
7.1 Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact
The greenhouse gas emissions from project construction equipment and worker vehicles are shown in
Table 12. The emissions are from all phases of construction. The total construction emissions
amortized over a period of 30 years are estimated at 28.26 metric tons of CO2e per year. Annual
CalEEMod output calculations are provided in Appendix B.
Table 12: Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Activity
Onsite
Emissions (MTCO2e)l
Offsite
Total
Site Preparation
16.85
0.60
17.45
Grading
82.46
1.98
84.45
Building Construction
256.42
477.79
734.22
Paving
20.19
0.97
21.15
Coating
5.28
2.56
7.83
Total
364.35
483.30
847.65
Averaged over 30 years21
12.15
16.11
28.26
Notes:
MTCO2e=metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalents (includes carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide).
Z The emissions are averaged over 30 years because the average is added to the operational emissions, pursuant to SCAQMD.
* CalEEMod output (Appendix B)
7.2 Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Impact
Operational emissions occur over the life of the project. The operational emissions for the project are
1,935.44 metric tons of CO2e per year (see Table 13). Furthermore, as shown in Table 13, the project's
total emissions (with incorporation of construction related GHG emissions) would be 1,963.70 metric
tons of CO2e per year. These emissions do not exceed the County of Riverside CAP Update and
SCAQMD screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons of CO2e per year. Therefore, the project's GHG
emissions are considered to be less than significant.
<Table 13 next page>
47
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Greenhouse Gas Impact Analysis
Table 13: Opening Year Unmitigated Project -Related Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Category
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons/Year)'
Bio -0O2 NonBio-CO2 CO2 CH4 N20
CO2e
Area Sources'
0.00 3.45 3.45
0.00
0.00
3.54
Energy Usage
0.00 449.10 449.10
0.02
0.01
451.60
Mobile Sources'
0.00 1,300.55 1,300.55
0.08
0.07
1,323.36
Solid Wastes
26.52 0.00 26.52
1.57
0.00
65.70
Water'
5.87 65.71 71.58
0.61
0.01
91.24
Construction'
0.00 27.44 27.44
0.00
0.00
28.26
Total Emissions
1 32.39 1 1,846.26 1 1,878.65 1
2.28 1
0.09
1 1,963.70
County of Riverside CAP and SCAQMD Draft Screening Threshold
3,000
Exceeds Threshold?
No
N otes:
Source: CalEEMod Version 2020.4.0
z Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscape equipment.
s Energy usage consist of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage.
° Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles.
5 Solid waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills.
s Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater.
Construction GHG emissions based on a 30 year amortization rate.
7.3 Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency
The proposed project would have the potential to conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation
of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. As stated previously, the
County of Riverside has adopted a Climate Action Plan; therefore, the project and its GHG emissions
have been compared to the goals of the County of Riverside CAP Update.
Consistency with the County of Riverside CAP Update
Per the County's CAP Update, the County adopted its first CAP in 2015 which set a target to reduce
emissions back to 1990 levels by the year 2020 as recommended in the AB 32 Scoping Plan.
Furthermore, the goals and supporting measures within the County's CAP Update are proposed to
reflect and ensure compliance with changes in the local and State policies and regulations such as SB
32 and California's 2017 Climate Change Scoping Plan. Therefore, compliance with the County's CAP in
turn reflects consistency with the goals of the CARB Scoping Plan, Assembly Bill (AB) 32 and Senate Bill
(SB) 32.
Appendix D of the Riverside County CAP Update also states that project's that do not exceed the CAP's
screening threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e per year are considered to have less than significant GHG
emissions and are in compliance with the County's CAP Update. According to the County's CAP Update,
projects that do not exceed emissions of 3,000 MTCO2e per year are also required to include the
following efficiency measures:
• Energy efficiency matching or exceeding the Title 24 requirements in effect as of January 2017,
and
48
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Greenhouse Gas ImpactAnalVsis
• Water conservation measures that matches the California Green Building Code in effect as of
January 2017.
As stated above, the GHG emissions generated by the proposed project would not exceed the County
of Riverside CAP Update screening threshold of 3,000 metric tons per year of CO2e.
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Energy Analysis
8.0 Energy Analysis
Information from the CalEEMod 2020.4.0 Daily and Annual Outputs contained in the air quality and
greenhouse gas analyses above was utilized for this analysis. The CalEEMod outputs detail project
related construction equipment, transportation energy demands, and facility energy demands.
8.1 Construction Energy Demand
8.1.1 Construction Equipment Electricity Usage Estimates
Electrical service will be provided by Southern California Edison (SCE). Based on the 2017 National
Construction Estimator, Richard Pray (2017)4, the typical power cost per 1,000 square feet of building
construction per month is estimated to be $2.32. The project plans to develop the site with 241,272
square feet of new single-family houses over the course of approximately 18 months. Based on Table
14, the total power cost of the on-site electricity usage during the construction of the proposed project
is estimated to be approximately $13,039.67. As shown in Table 14, the total electricity usage from
Project construction related activities is estimated to be approximately 237,085 kWh.'
Table 14: Project Construction Power Cost and Electricity Usage
Power Cost (per 1,000 square
Total Building
Construction
Total Project
foot of building per month of
Size (1,000
Duration
Construction
construction)
Square Foot)'
(months)
Power Cost
$2.32
331
17
$13,039.67
Cost per kWh
Total Project Construction
Electricity Usage (kWh)
$0.06
237,085
* Assumes the project will be under the GS -1 General Service rate under SCE.
4 Pray, Richard. 2017 National Construction Estimator. Carlsbad: Craftsman Book Company, 2017.
5 LADWP's Small Commercial & Multi -Family Service (A-1) is approximately $0.06 per kWh of electricity Southern California Edison
(SCE). Rates & Pricing Choices: General Service/Industrial Rates. https://libra ry.sce.com/content/dam/sce-
doclib/public/regulatory/historical/electric/2020/schedules/general-service-&-industrial-rates/ELECTRIC_SCHEDULES_GS-1_2020.pdf
50
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Energy Analysis
8.1.2 Construction Equipment Fuel Estimates
Using the CaIEEMod data input, the project's construction phase would consume electricity and fossil
fuels as a single energy demand, that is, once construction is completed their use would cease. CARB's
2017 Emissions Factors Tables show that on average aggregate fuel consumption (gasoline and diesel
fuel) would be approximately 18.5 hp-hr-gal.6 As presented in Table 15 below, project construction
activities would consume an estimated 51,277 gallons of diesel fuel.
Table 15: Construction Equipment Fuel Consumption Estimates
Phase
Number
of Days
Offroad Equipment Type
Usage
Amount Hours
Horse
Power
Total Fuel
HP Consumption
Load hrs/ (gal diesel
Factor day fuel)1,2
Site
Preparation
30
Rubber Tired Dozers
3 8
247
0.4 2,371 3,845
30
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
4 8
97
0.37 1,148 1,862
30
Excavators
2 8
158
0.38 961 1,558
30
Graders
1 8
187
0.41 613 995
Grading
30
Rubber Tired Dozers
1 8
247
0.4 790 1,282
30
Scrapers
2 8
367
0.48 2,819 4,571
30
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2 8
97
0.37 574 931
300
Cranes
1 7
231
0.29 469 7,604
300
Forklifts
3 8
89
0.2 427 6,928
Building
300
Generator Sets
1 8
84
0.74 497 8,064
Construction
300
Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
3 7
97
0.37 754 12,222
300
Welders
1 8
46
0.45 166 2,685
20
Pavers
2 8
130
0.42 874 944
Paving
20
Paving Equipment
2 8
132
0.36 760 822
20
Rollers
2 8
80
0.38 486 526
Architectural
Coating
20
Air Compressors
1 6
78
0.48 225 243
CONSTRUCTION FUEL DEMAND (gallons of diesel fuel) 51,277
Notes:
'Using Carl Moyer Guidelines Table D-21 Fuel consumption rate factors (bhp-hr/gal) for engines less than 750 hp.
(Source: https://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/moyer/guidelines/2017gl/2017 gl appendix d.pdf)
'Discrepancies are due to rounding.
8.1.3 Construction Worker Fuel Estimates
It is assumed that all construction worker trips are from light duty autos (LDA) along area roadways.
With respect to estimated VMT, the construction worker trips would generate an estimated 236,670
6 Aggregate fuel consumption rate for all equipment was estimated at 18.5 hp-hr/day (from CARB's 2017 Emissions Factors Tables and
fuel consumption rate factors as shown in Table D-21 of the Moyer Guidelines:
(https://www. arb.ca.gov/msprog/mover/guidelines/2017gl/2017 gl appendix d.pdf).
51
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Energy Analysis
VMT. Vehicle fuel efficiencies for construction workers were estimated in the air quality and
greenhouse gas analysis using information generated using CARB's EMFAC model (see Appendix C for
details). Table 16 shows that an estimated 59,712 gallons of fuel would be consumed for construction
worker trips.
Table 16: Construction Worker Fuel Consumption Estimates
Phase
Number of
Days
Worker
Trips/Day
Trip Length
(miles)'
Vehicle
Miles
Traveled
Average
Vehicle Fuel
Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)'
Site Preparation
10
18
14.7
2,646
30.95
85
Grading
30
20
14.7
8,820
30.95
285
Building Construction
300
410
14.7
1,808,100
30.95
58,420
Paving
20
15
14.7
4,410
30.95
142
Architectural Coating
1 20
1 82
1 14.7
1 24,108
1 30.95
1 779
Total Construction Worker Fuel Consumption
59,712
Notes:
'Assumptions for the worker trip length and vehicle miles traveled are consistent with CalEEMod 2020.4.0 defaults.
2Discrepancies are due to rounding.
8.1.4 Construction Vendor/Hauling Fuel Estimates
Tables 17 and 18 show the estimated fuel consumption for vendor and hauling during building
construction and architectural coating. With respect to estimated VMT, the vendor trips would
generate an estimated 229,770 VMT. No hauling trips are anticipated for the project as the site will
balance for grading. For the architectural coatings it is assumed that the contractors would be
responsible for bringing coatings and equipment with them in their light duty vehicles.' Tables 17 and
18 show that an estimated 24,921 gallons of fuel would be consumed for vendor and hauling trips. It is
anticipated there will be no hauling trips for this project.
<Tables 17 & 18, next page>
' Vendors delivering construction material or hauling debris from the site during grading would use medium to heavy duty vehicles
with an average fuel consumption of 9.22 mpg for medium heavy-duty trucks and 6.74 mpg for heavy heavy-duty trucks (see Appendix
C for details).
52
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Energy Analysis
Table 17: Construction Vendor Fuel Consumption Estimates (MHD Trucks)'
Phase
Number of
Days
Vendor
Trips/Day
Trip Length
(miles)
Vehicle
Miles
Traveled
Average Vehicle
Fuel Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
Site Preparation
10
0
6.9
0
9.22
0
Grading
30
0
6.9
0
9.22
0
Building Construction
300
111
6.9
229,770
9.22
24,921
Paving
20
0
6.9
0
9.22
0
Architectural Coating
20
0
6.9
0
9.22
0
Total Vendor Fuel Consumption
24,921
Notes:
'Assumptions for the vendor trip length and vehicle miles traveled are consistent with Cal EEMod 2020.4.0 defaults.
Table 18: Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption Estimates (HHD Trucks)'
Phase
Number of
Days
Hauling
Trips/Day
Trip Length
(miles)
Vehicle
Miles
Traveled
Average Vehicle
Fuel Economy
(mpg)
Estimated Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
Site Preparation
10
0
20
0
6.74
0
Grading
30
0
20
0
6.74
0
Building Construction
300
0
20
0
6.74
0
Paving
20
0
20
0
6.74
0
Architectural Coating
20
0
20
0
6.74
0
Total Construction Hauling Fuel Consumption
0
N otes:
'Assumptions for the hauling trip length and vehicle miles traveled are consistent with CalEEMod 2020.40 defaults.
8.1.5 Construction Energy Efficiency/Conservation Measures
Construction equipment used over the approximately 18 -month construction phase would conform to
CARB regulations and California emissions standards and is evidence of related fuel efficiencies. In
addition, the CARB Airborne Toxic Control Measure limits idling times of construction vehicles to no
more than five minutes, thereby minimizing unnecessary and wasteful consumption of fuel due to
unproductive idling of construction equipment. Furthermore, the project has been designed in
compliance with California's Energy Efficiency Standards and 2019 CALGreen Standards.
Construction of the proposed residential development would require the typical use of energy
resources. There are no unusual project characteristics or construction processes that would require
the use of equipment that would be more energy intensive than is used for comparable activities; or
equipment that would not conform to current emissions standards (and related fuel efficiencies).
Equipment employed in construction of the project would therefore not result in inefficient wasteful,
or unnecessary consumption of fuel.
53
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Energy Analysis
8.2 Operational Energy Demand
Energy consumption in support of or related to project operations would include transportation energy
demands (energy consumed by employee and patron vehicles accessing the project site) and facilities
energy demands (energy consumed by building operations and site maintenance activities).
8.2.1 Transportation Fuel Consumption
The largest source of operational energy use would be vehicle operation of customers. The site is
located in an urbanized area just in close proximity to transit stops. Using the CaIEEMod output, it is
assumed that an average trip for autos were assumed to be 16.6 miles, light trucks were assumed to
travel an average of 6.9 miles, and 3- 4 -axle trucks were assumed to travel an average of 8.4 miles'. To
show a worst-case analysis, as the proposed project is a residential project, it was assumed that
vehicles would operate 365 days per year. Table 19 shows the worst-case estimated annual fuel
consumption for all classes of vehicles from autos to heavy -heavy trucks.' Table 19 shows that an
estimated 271,069 gallons of fuel would be consumed per year for the operation of the proposed
project.
Table 19: Estimated Vehicle Operations Fuel Consumption
Vehicle Type
Vehicle Mix
Number
of
Vehicles
Average
Trip
(miles)'
Daily
VMT
Average
Fuel
Economy
(mpg)
Total
Gallons
per Day
Total Annual
Fuel
Consumption
(gallons)
Light Auto
Automobile
943
16.6
15,654
31.82
491.94
179,559
Light Truck
Automobile
105
6.69
706
27.16
25.98
9,483
Light Truck
Automobile
321
6.69
2,146
25.6
83.83
30,597
Medium Truck
Automobile
226
6.69
1,513
20.81
72.70
26,537
Light Heavy Truck
2 -Axle Truck
41
8.4
348
13.81
25.17
9,185
Light Heavy Truck 10,000 lbs +
2 -Axle Truck
11
8.4
93
14.18
6.53
2,385
Medium Heavy Truck
3 -Axle Truck
20
8.4
171
9.58
17.84
6,511
Heavy Heavy Truck
4 -Axle Truck
16
8.4
133
7.14
18.66
6,812
Total
1 1,684
1 8.7838
1 20,763
1 18.76
742.65
--
Total Annual Fuel Consumption
271,069
Notes:
11 The trip generation assessment, the project is to generate 82 total net new trips after reduction of existing uses. Default CalEEMod vehicle fleet mix utilized.
'Based on the size of the site and relative location, trips were assumed to be local rather than regional.
Trip generation generated by the proposed project are consistent with other similar residential uses of
similar scale and configuration as reflected in the traffic analysis (Integrated Engineering Group, 2021).
That is, the proposed project does not propose uses or operations that would inherently result in
excessive and wasteful vehicle trips, nor associated excess and wasteful vehicle energy consumption.
$ CalEEMod default distance for H -W (home -work) or C -W (commercial -work) is 16.6 miles; 6.9 miles for H -S (home -shop) or C -C (commercial -customer);
and 8.4 miles for H -O (home -other) or C -O (commercial -other).
9 Average fuel economy based on aggregate mileage calculated in EMFAC 2017 for opening year (2023). See Appendix C for EMFAC output.
54
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Energy Analysis
Therefore, project transportation energy consumption would not be considered inefficient, wasteful,
or otherwise unnecessary.
8.2.2 Facility Energy Demands (Electricity and Natural Gas)
The annual natural gas and electricity demands were provided per the CaIEEMod output and are
provided in Table 20.
Table 20: Project Unmitigated Annual Operational Energy Demand Summary'
Natural Gas Demand
kBTU/year
Apartments Low Rise
254,582
Total
254,582
Electricity Demand
kWh/year
Apartments Low Rise
1,184,270
Parking Lot
55,496
Total
1,239,766
Notes:
'Taken from the CalEEMod 2020.4.0 annual output.
As shown in Table 20, the estimated electricity demand for the proposed project is approximately
1,239,766 kWh per year. In 2020, the residential sector of the County of Riverside consumed
approximately 8,843 million kWh of electricity.10 In addition, the estimated natural gas consumption
for the proposed project is approximately 4,295,760 kBTU per year. In 2019, the non-residential sector
of the County of Riverside consumed approximately 302 million therms of gas." Therefore, the
increase in both electricity and natural gas demand from the proposed project is insignificant
compared to the County's 2019 demand.
8.3 Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Plan Consistency
Regarding federal transportation regulations, the project site is located in an already developed area.
Access to/from the project site is from existing roads. These roads are already in place so the project
would not interfere with, nor otherwise obstruct intermodal transportation plans or projects that may
be proposed pursuant to the ISTEA because SCAG is not planning for intermodal facilities in the project
area.
Regarding the State's Energy Plan and compliance with Title 24 CCR energy efficiency standards, the
applicant is required to comply with the California Green Building Standard Code requirements for
energy efficient buildings and appliances as well as utility energy efficiency programs implemented by
the SCE and Southern California Gas Company.
io California Energy Commission, Electricity Consumption by County. https://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/elecbycounty.aspx
"California Energy Commission, Gas Consumption by County. http://ecdms.energy.ca.gov/gasbycounty.aspx
55
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA Energy Analysis
Regarding the State's Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards, the project would be required to meet or
exceed the energy standards established in the California Green Building Standards Code, Title 24, Part
11 (CALGreen). CalGreen Standards require that new buildings reduce water consumption, employ
building commissioning to increase building system efficiencies, divert construction waste from
landfills, and install low pollutant -emitting finish materials.
56
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA References
9.0 References
The following references were used in the preparing this analysis.
California Air Pollution Control Officers Association
2009 Health Risk Assessments for Proposed Land Use Projects
California Air Resources Board
2008 Resolution 08-43
2008 Recommended Approaches for Setting Interim Significance Thresholds for Greenhouse
Gases under the California Environmental Quality Act
2008 ARB Recommended Interim Risk Management Policy for Inhalation -Based Residential Cancer
Risk — Frequently Asked Questions
2008 Climate Change Scoping Plan, a framework for change.
2011 Supplement to the AB 32 Scoping Plan Functional Equivalent Document
2014 First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan, Building on the Framework Pursuant to
A1332, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. May.
2018 Historical Air Quality, Top 4 Summary
City of La Quinta
2007 Official Zoning Map. September.
County of Riverside
2015 County of Riverside General Plan. December 8.
2019 County of Riverside Climate Action Plan Update. November.
Governor's Office of Planning and Research
2008 CEQA and Climate: Addressing Climate Change Through California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) Review
2009 CEQA Guideline Sections to be Added or Amended
Integrated Engineering Group
2021 Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis. December.
57
Troutdale Village
Air Quality, Greenhouse Gas, and Energy Impact Study
City of La Quinta, CA References
Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment
2015 Air Toxics Hot Spots Program Risk Assessment Guidelines
South Coast Air Quality Management District
1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook
2005 Rule 403 Fugitive Dust
2007 2007 Air Quality Management Plan
2008 Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, Revised
2011 Appendix A Calculation Details for CalEEMod
2012 Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan
2016 Final 2016 Air Quality Management Plan
58
Appendix A:
CalEEMod Daily Emission Output
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Troutdale Village
Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces
7.61 + Acre
; 7.61 331,491.60
i 0
Parking Lot 560.00 Space 3.64 158,560.00 0
+
;
i
•------------------------------+----------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------I-------------------E---------------
Apartments Low Rise
284.00
Dwelling Unit
1.92 241,272.00
812
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.4 Precipitation Freq (Days) 28
Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2023
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2 Intensity 390.98 CH4Intensity 0.033 N20 Intensity 0.004
(Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Appproximately 14.57 acre apartment complex with 284 units (228,378 SF), 12,894 SF of facilites, and 560 parking spaces. Paving estimated at
25% of total site (3.64 acres).
Construction Phase - e
Off-road Equipment - Mit
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Grading -
Architectural Coating - Low VOC paint to be used
Vehicle Trips - 1,684 trips generated per day per Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis from Integrated Engineering Group
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Woodstoves - No hearths.
Area Coating - Low VOC paint to be used
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation - AB 341 requires each jurisdiction in CA to divert at least 75% of their waste away from landfills by 2020.
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitectu ral Coating
EF_ Nonresidential -Exterior 250.00
40.00
tblArchitecturalCoatin g
------------r-----------------------------t--------------------------
EF
v 250.00 40.00
-Nonresidential -Interior
----------------------------_------------------------------
tblArchitecturalCoating
r -----------------------------t--------------------------
EF Parking v 250.00 40.00
---------------------g------_------------------------------r-----------------------------t-------------------------
tblArchitecturalCoatin
EF_ Residential_ Exterior v 250.00 40.00
----------------------g------_------------------------------r-----------------------------t--------------------------
tblArchitecturalCoatin
EF_ Residential_ Interior 250.00 40.00
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------------------------------ ----------------------------- --------------------------
Area EF Nonresidential Exterior 1 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoatin
------ ------------------ ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Nonresidential Interior 1 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------ ----------------------' ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Parking v 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Residential Exterior v 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Residential Interior v 250 40
-----------------------------
tblFireplaces
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
FireplaceDayYear i 82.00 0.00
-----------------------------_-----------------------------'------------t--------------------------
tblFireplaces
FireplaceHourDay i 3.00 0.00
----------------------------- _------------------------------
tblFireplaces
r-----------------------------t--------------------------
FireplaceWoodMass 457.60 0.00
--------------p -------------_-----------------------------'
tblFire laces
-----------t--------------------------
NumberGas v 227.20 0.00
-----------------------------
tblFireplaces
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
NumberNoFireplace v 28.40 0.00
--------------p-------------_-------------------
tblFire laces
------------t--------------------------
Numbeood v 28.40 0.00
rW
-----------------------------_-----------------------------
tblLandUse
r-----------------------------t--------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet 224,000.00 158,560.00
-----------------------------_-----------------------------r-----------------------------t--------------------------
tblLandUse
Land UseSquareFeet 284,000.00 241,272.00
-----------------------------_-----------------g-----------
tblLandUse
' ------------t--------------------------
LotAcrea e i 5.04 3.64
-----------------------------_----------------------------
tblLandUse
' ------------t--------------------------
LotAcreage v 17.75 1.92
----------------------------_----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------t--------------------------
ST_TR i 8.14 5.89
----------------------------_-----------------------------'
tblVehicleTrips
------------t--------------------------
SU TR i 6.28 5.89
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------------------------ ------------------------------- --------------------------
WD TR 7.32 5.89
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
14.20
0.00
•-----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
Y ---------------------------- ---------------------------------T--------------------------
NumberNoncatalytic
} 14.20
0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
} 82.00
0.00
•----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
------------------------------ ------------------------------
WoodstoveWood Mass
999.60
--------------------------
0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
Ib/day
Ib/day
1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1
2022 •I 3.6926 1 38.8842 1 30.5958 I 0.0746 1 19.8076 I 1.6358 1 21.4210 1 10.1424 I 1.5049 11.6267 0.0000 1 7,468.075 1 7,468.075 I 1.9486 1 0.3402 i 7,587.492
1 9 1 9 I 1 I 6
1 I I I
........... - - - - - - J- - - - - -- J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J - - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J----------------------- - - - - - - J -I - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - * ...... .
1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I :-7,315.895 1 I 1
2023 •I 63.5628 1 18.2632 1 29.3881 I 0.0729 1 3.9874 I 0.7412 1 4.7286 1 1.0703 I 0.6975 1.7678 � 0.0000 1 7,315.895 I 0.7170 1 0.3229 i 7,429.779
7 1 7 I 1 I 5
Maximum
63.5628
38.8842
30.5958
0.0746
19.8076
1.6358
21.4210
10.1424
1.5049
1177777
5.4642
7,468.075
7,468.075
1.9486
0.3402
7,587.492
7,587.492
9
1
9
9
6
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
Ib/day
Ib/day
1 I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1
2022 •I 3.6926 38.8842 30.5958 0.0746 7.8168 1.6358 9.4302 3.9799 1.5049 5.4642 � 0.0000 1 7,468.075 1.9486 0.3402 i 7,587.492
1 I I 1 1 1 1 1 17,468.075 1 1
1 9 1 9 I 1 I 6
........... - - - - - - J- - - - - -- J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J - - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J----------------------- - - - - - - J -I - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - * ...... .
I- 1-
1 I I 1 I 1 1 I I 1
2023 •I 63.5628 1 18.2632 I 29.3881 I 0.0729 1 3.9874 I 0.7412 1 4.7286 I 1.0703 I 0.6975 1.7678 � 0.0000 1 7,315.895 17,315.895 1 0.7170 1 0.3229 i 7,429.779
7 1 7 I 1 I 5
Maximum
63.5628
38.8842
30.5958
0.0746
7.8168
1.6358
9.4302
3.9799
1.5049
5.4642
0.0000
7,468.075
7,468.075
1.9486
0.3402
7,587.492
9
9
6
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG
NOx
Co
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
50.39
0.00
45.85
54.96
0.00
46.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
I I I I I I I I I I 1
Area •I 6.3940 I 0.2707 I 23.4935 I 1.2400e- I I 0.1299 I 0.1299 I I 0.1299 0.1299 0.0000 I 42.3131 I 42.3131 I 0.0409 I 0.0000 i 43.3355
003
I I I I
•
1I 1-
I I I I I I I I I 1
Energy •I 0.1269 I 1.0846 I 0.4615 16.9200e- I I 0.0877 I 0.0877 I I 0.0877 0.0877 - 1 1,384.611 11,384.611 I 0.0265 I 0.0254 1,392.840
003 I I I I I • I 91 g I 1 I 0
• I - I I I
1 I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1
Mobile •I 4.6657 I 5.2545 I 37.9868 I 0.0811 I 7.9070 I 0.0638 I 7.9708 I 2.1096 I 0.0598 2.1694 8,344.397 18,344.397 I 0.4572 I 0.4133 i 8,478.976
'I
I I I I I I I I • I 3 1 3 I 1 I 8
'I
I I I I I I I I • I I I I I
Total
11.1866
6.6097
61.9419
0.0893
7.9070
0.2814
8.1884
2.1096
0.2774
2.3870
0.0000
9,771.322
9,771.322
0.5247
0.4386
9,915.152
11
777,11
3
3
3
2
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
I 1 I I I I I I I I 1
Area •I 6.3940 I 0.2707 1 23.4935 11.2400e- 1 1 0.1299 I 0.1299 1 I 0.1299 0.1299 � 0.0000 I 42.3131 1 42.3131 I 0.0409 1 0.0000 i 43.3355
003 I 1 I I I • 1 I I I
• I I 1
........... J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J - - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J - - - - - - - - - .. - - - . + .......I- - - - - - - J- - ----- J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - * ...... .
I 1 I I I I I I I I 1
Energy •I 0.1269 I 1.0846 1 0.4615 16.9200e- 1 1 0.0877 I 0.0877 1 I 0.0877 � 0.0877 � 11,384.611 1 1,384.611 I 0.0265 1 0.0254 i 1,392.840
003 I 1 I I I • 1 g I 9 I I I 0
I 1 I I I I I I I I 1
Mobile •I 4.6657 I 5.2545 1 37.9868 I 0.0811 1 7.9070 1 0.0638 I 7.9708 1 2.1096 I 0.0598 2.1694 18,344.397 1 8,344.397 I 0.4572 1 0.4133 8,478.976
3 I 3 I I I 8
11.1866
6.6097
61.9419
0.0893
7.9070
0.2814
8.1884
2.1096
0.2774
2.3870
0.0000
9,771.322
9,771.322
0.5247
0.4386
9,915.152
777,11
3
3
2
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Phase Name
Number
Phase Type
Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days
Week
Phase Description
1 Site Preparation
ROG
NOx
c0
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
30:
158•
i
I
i
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
5:
300:
Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers
i
I
i
Percent
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Reduction
5.
20,
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Phase Name
Number
Phase Type
Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days
Week
Phase Description
1 Site Preparation
'Site Preparation
11/1/2022
11/14/2022
5:
10:
------------------------------
i
I
i
i
; 41
2 •Grading
'Grading
11/15/2022
12/25/2022
5:
30:
158•
i
I
i
8.001
--------------
187•
3 •Building Construction
'Building Construction
12/26/2022
14/21/2023
5:
300:
Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers
i
I
i
0.40
----- ------ ------ ------ --------------------------------
4 •Paving
'Paving
14/22/2023
15/19/2023
5:
20:
8.00•
i
I
i
i
5 •Architectural Coating
:Architectural Coating
5/20/2023
6/16/2023
5.
20,
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90
Acres of Paving: 11.25
Residential Indoor: 488,576; Residential Outdoor: 162,859; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area:
29,403 (Architectural Coating — sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor
Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers
; 31
8.001
247:
0.40
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 41
8.001
97 •
0.37
-------------------------------------------------------
Grading +Excavators
----------------------------------
; 21
-----------------------------------------
8.001
158•
0.38
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Grading 'Graders
; 11
8.001
--------------
187•
0.41
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers
; 1y
8.00?
247•
0.40
----- ------ ------ ------ --------------------------------
*-----------------
------------ T --------------
-------------
Grading :Scrapers
2
8.00•
367•
0.48
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Grading
•Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2
8.00-
97:
0.37
------------------------------------------------------=----------------=--------------------------r--------------
Building Construction
'Cranes
; 1 i
7.001
231 •
0.29
-----------------------------------------------------
HHDT
-----------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Building Construction
',Forklifts
; 31
8.001
89•
0.20
a_
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------_i
-------------------------
--------------
----------------------------�
Building Construction
'Generator Sets
; 11
8.001
84•
0.74
-----------------------------------------------------
6;
' i
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
: HDT_Mix
Building Construction
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 31
7.001
97•
0.37
-----------------------------------------------------
82.00, 0.00, 0.00, 11.00,
' i
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
rHHDT
Building Construction
'Welders
; 11
8.001
46•
0.45
-----------------------------------------------------
i ------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Paving
+Pavers
; 21
8.001
130•
0.42
-----------------------------------------------------_
------------------------------_i
-------------------------
--------------
Paving
'Paving Equipment
; 21
8.001
132•
0.36
-----------------------------------------------------_
------------------------------_i
------------ --------------
--------------
Paving
'Rollers
; 21
8.001
80•
0.38
-------------------------------------------------------*-----------------E------------r-------------
--------------
Architectural Coating
:Air Compressors
1
6.00:
78:
0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling
Count I Number I Number I Number I Length I Length Length Class I Vehicle Class I Vehicle Class
Site Preparation
7;
18.00 0.0010.00; 11.00;
5.40;
20.00: LD_Mix
: HDT_Mix
: HHDT
Grading
8;
i
20.00: 0.001 0.00 11.00:
5.40;
20.00:LD_Mix
;
iHDT_Mix
HHDT
--------------
--------i ---------4----------------------------------'----------r----------
Building Construction
9;
410.00 111.00: 0.00 11.00:
5.40,
20.00: LID Mix
: HDT_Mix
: HHDT
----------------------------�
--------i ---------4----------------------------------'----------r----------
Paving
6;
15.00 0.001 0.00 11.00:
5.40;
20.00: LID—Mix
: HDT_Mix
: HHDT
E
Architectural Coating ;
1 •
82.00, 0.00, 0.00, 11.00,
5.40,
20.00, LID Mix
HDT_Mix
rHHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 i 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 i 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 i 0.0380 i 1.6126 1.6126 i 1.4836 1.4836 i 3,686.061 3,686.061 i 1.1922 i 3,715.865
gi 9 5
Worker •i 0.0610 0.0367 0.5582 i 1.3800e- 0.1506 i 7.7000e- 0.1514 0.0400 i 7.1000e- 0.0407 140.1213 140.1213 i 3.9800e- 3.7000e- i 141.3245
Total
3.1701
33.0835
19.6978
0.0380
19.6570
1.6126
21.2696
10.1025
1.4836
1777
7.1000e-
3,686.061
3,686.061
1.1922
140.1213
3,715.865
3.7000e-
141.3245
003
004
004
9
1
9
5
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0610 0.0367 0.5582 i 1.3800e- 0.1506 i 7.7000e- 0.1514 0.0400 i 7.1000e- 0.0407 140.1213 140.1213 i 3.9800e- 3.7000e- i 141.3245
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0610
0.0367
0.5582
1.3800e-
0.1506
7.7000e-
0.1514
0.0400
7.1000e-
0.0407
140.1213
140.1213
3.9800e-
3.7000e-
141.3245
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 7.6662 i 0.0000 7.6662 3.9400 i 0.0000 3.9400 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 i 0.0380 i 1.6126 1.6126 i 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 i 3,686.061 3,686.061 i 1.1922 i 3,715.865
gi 9 5
Worker •i 0.0610 0.0367 0.5582 i 1.3800e- 0.1506 i 7.7000e- 0.1514 0.0400 i 7.1000e- 0.0407 140.1213 140.1213 i 3.9800e- 3.7000e- i 141.3245
Total
3.1701
33.0835
19.6978
0.0380
7.6662
1.6126
9.2788
3.9400
1.4836
5.4235
0.0000
3,686.061
3,686.061
1.1922
140.1213
3,715.865
3.7000e-
141.3245
003
004
004
9
9
5
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0610 0.0367 0.5582 i 1.3800e- 0.1506 i 7.7000e- 0.1514 0.0400 i 7.1000e- 0.0407 140.1213 140.1213 i 3.9800e- 3.7000e- i 141.3245
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0610
0.0367
0.5582
1.3800e-
0.1506
7.7000e-
0.1514
0.0400
7.1000e-
0.0407
140.1213
140.1213
3.9800e-
3.7000e-
141.3245
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 i 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 i 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 i 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 6,011.410 i 1.9442 6,060.015
5 i 5 i i i 8
Worker •i 0.0678 0.0407 0.6202 i 1.5300e- 0.1673 i 8.6000e- 0.1682 0.0444 i 7.9000e- 0.0452 155.6903 155.6903 i 4.4200e- 4.1200e- i 157.0272
Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
9.2036
1.6349
10.8385
3.6538
1.5041
5.1579
7.9000e-
6,011.410
6,011.410
1.9442
155.6903
6,060.015
4.1200e-
157.0272
003
004
004
5
5
8
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0678 0.0407 0.6202 i 1.5300e- 0.1673 i 8.6000e- 0.1682 0.0444 i 7.9000e- 0.0452 155.6903 155.6903 i 4.4200e- 4.1200e- i 157.0272
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0678
0.0407
0.6202
1.5300e-
0.1673
8.6000e-
0.1682
0.0444
7.9000e-
0.0452
155.6903
155.6903
4.4200e-
4.1200e-
157.0272
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2022
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 3.5894 i 0.0000 3.5894 1.4250 i 0.0000 1.4250 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 i 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 i 6,011.410 6,011.410 i 1.9442 6,060.015
5 i 5 i i i 8
Worker •i 0.0678 0.0407 0.6202 i 1.5300e- 0.1673 i 8.6000e- 0.1682 0.0444 i 7.9000e- 0.0452 155.6903 155.6903 i 4.4200e- 4.1200e- i 157.0272
Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
3.5894
1.6349
5.2243
1.4250
1.5041
2.9291
0.0000
6,011.410
6,011.410
1.9442
155.6903
6,060.015
4.1200e-
157.0272
003
004
004
5
5
8
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0678 0.0407 0.6202 i 1.5300e- 0.1673 i 8.6000e- 0.1682 0.0444 i 7.9000e- 0.0452 155.6903 155.6903 i 4.4200e- 4.1200e- i 157.0272
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0678
0.0407
0.6202
1.5300e-
0.1673
8.6000e-
0.1682
0.0444
7.9000e-
0.0452
155.6903
155.6903
4.4200e-
4.1200e-
157.0272
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632
� i i
6 i 6
Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
Total
0.8090
0.8090
14.2324
0.7612
0.7612
0.0709
2,554.333
2,554.333
0.6120
1.1375
2,569.632
4,913.742
4,913.742
0.1095
0.3402
5,017.860
6
6
2
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.1599 3.9811 1.5189 i 0.0163 0.5571 i 0.0533 0.6103 0.1605 i 0.0510 0.2114 i 1,722.091 1,722.091 i 0.0189 0.2558 i 1,798.802
3 i 3 i i i 1
■
Worker •i 1.3897 0.8350 12.7135 i 0.0314 3.4304 i 0.0176 3.4480 0.9099 i 0.0162 0.9261 i 3,191.651 3,191.651 i 0.0907 0.0844 i 3,219.058
00 i 2
Total
1.5496
4.8161
14.2324
0.0476
3.9874
0.0709
4.0583
1.0703
0.0672
1.1375
4,913.742
4,913.742
0.1095
0.3402
5,017.860
3
3
4
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.7062 � 15.6156 16.3634 i 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 i 2,554.333 2,554.333 i 0.6120 2,569.632
6 i 6 i i i 2
Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
Total
0.8090
0.8090
14.2324
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
2,554.333
0.6120
1.1375
2,569.632
4,913.742
4,913.742
0.1095
0.3402
5,017.860
6
6
2
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.1599 3.9811 1.5189 i 0.0163 0.5571 i 0.0533 0.6103 0.1605 i 0.0510 0.2114 i 1,722.091 1,722.091 i 0.0189 0.2558 i 1,798.802
3 i 3 i i i 1
■
Worker •i 1.3897 0.8350 12.7135 i 0.0314 3.4304 i 0.0176 3.4480 0.9099 i 0.0162 0.9261 i 3,191.651 3,191.651 i 0.0907 0.0844 i 3,219.058
00 i 2
Total
1.5496
4.8161
14.2324
0.0476
3.9874
0.0709
4.0583
1.0703
0.0672
1.1375
4,913.742
4,913.742
0.1095
0.3402
5,017.860
3
3
4
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i 2,570.406
� � i � i �
9 i 9
Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
3.8783
0.6584
0.6584
3.9874
2,555.209
2,555.209
0.6079
0.0391
2,570.406
4,760.685
4,760.685
0.0992
0.3229
4,859.373
9
9
1
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.1163 3.1382 1.4228 i 0.0156 0.5570 i 0.0249 0.5819 0.1605 i 0.0238 0.1843 i 1,653.444 1,653.444 i 0.0175 0.2448 i 1,726.832
4 i 4 i i i 9
■
Worker •i 1.2875 0.7401 11.7213 i 0.0304 3.4304 i 0.0166 3.4469 0.9099 i 0.0153 0.9251 i 3,107.241 3,107.241 i 0.0817 0.0781 i 3,132.540
4 4 i 6
Total
1.4038
3.8783
13.1441
0.0460
3.9874
0.0415
4.0289
1.0703
0.0391
1.1094
4,760.685
4,760.685
0.0992
0.3229
4,859.373
8
8
5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 i 0.0269 i 0.6997 0.6997 i 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 i 2,555.209 2,555.209 i 0.6079 i 2,570.406
g
Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
0.6997
0.6997
3.8783
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
2,555.209
0.6079
0.0391
2,570.406
4,760.685
4,760.685
0.0992
0.3229
4,859.373
9
9
1
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.1163 3.1382 1.4228 i 0.0156 0.5570 i 0.0249 0.5819 0.1605 i 0.0238 0.1843 i 1,653.444 1,653.444 i 0.0175 0.2448 i 1,726.832
4 i 4 i i i 9
■
Worker •i 1.2875 0.7401 11.7213 i 0.0304 3.4304 i 0.0166 3.4469 0.9099 i 0.0153 0.9251 i 3,107.241 3,107.241 i 0.0817 0.0781 i 3,132.540
4 4 i 6
Total
1.4038
3.8783
13.1441
0.0460
3.9874
0.0415
4.0289
1.0703
0.0391
1.1094
4,760.685
4,760.685
0.0992
0.3229
4,859.373
8
8
5
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 i 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 i 0.7140 � � 2,225.433
1 i 1 i i i 6
Paving •i 0.4768 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total
1.5096
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.4288
0.5102
0.5102
6.1000e-
0.4694
0.4694
5.6000e-
2,207.584
2,207.584
0.7140
113.6796
2,225.433
2.8600e-
114.6051
003
004
004
1
1
6
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0471 0.0271 0.4288 i 1.1100e- 0.1255 i 6.1000e- 0.1261 0.0333 i 5.6000e- 0.0339 113.6796 113.6796 i 2.9900e- 2.8600e- i 114.6051
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0471
0.0271
0.4288
1.1100e-
0.1255
6.1000e-
0.1261
0.0333
5.6000e-
0.0339
113.6796
113.6796
2.9900e-
2.8600e-
114.6051
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 i 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433
i i � i
1 i 1 i i i 6
Paving �i 0.4768 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � � � 0.0000 0.0000
Total
1.5096
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.0271
0.5102
0.5102
0.1255
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
2,207.584
0.7140
113.6796
2,225.433
2.9900e-
2.8600e-
114.6051
003
004
1
1
6
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0471 0.0271 0.4288 i 1.1100e- 0.1255 i 6.1000e- 0.1261 0.0333 i 5.6000e- 0.0339 113.6796 113.6796 i 2.9900e- 2.8600e- i 114.6051
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0471
0.0271
0.4288
1.1100e-
0.1255
6.1000e-
0.1261
0.0333
5.6000e-
0.0339
113.6796
113.6796
2.9900e-
2.8600e-
114.6051
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Archit. Coating •i 63.1137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 0.1917 � 1.3030 � 1.8111 i 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 i 0.0168 281.8690
003
Total
63.3053
1.3030
1.8111
2.9700e-
0.2575
0.0708
0.0708
6.0700e-
0.0708
0.0708
0.6894
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8690
621.4483
0.0163
0.0156
626.5081
003
003
003
003
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.2575 0.1480 2.3443 i 6.0700e- 0.6861 i 3.3100e- 0.6894 0.1820 i 3.0500e- 0.1850 621.4483 621.4483 i 0.0163 0.0156 i 626.5081
003 003 003
Total
0.2575
0.1480
2.3443
6.0700e-
0.6861
3.3100e-
0.6894
0.1820
3.0500e-
0.1850
621.4483
621.4483
0.0163
0.0156
626.5081
003
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Archit. Coating •i 63.1137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 0.1917 � 1.3030 � 1.8111 i 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 i 0.0168 281.8690
003
Total
63.3053
1.3030
1.8111
2.9700e-
0.2575
0.0708
0.0708
6.0700e-
0.0708
0.0708
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
281.8690
621.4483
0.0163
0.0156
626.5081
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.2575 0.1480 2.3443 i 6.0700e- 0.6861 i 3.3100e- 0.6894 0.1820 i 3.0500e- 0.1850 621.4483 621.4483 i 0.0163 0.0156 i 626.5081
003 003 003
Total
0.2575
0.1480
2.3443
6.0700e-
0.6861
3.3100e-
0.6894
0.1820
3.0500e-
0.1850
621.4483
621.4483
0.0163
0.0156
626.5081
003
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
ROG
I NOx
I CO
I SO2
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
I Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
Ib/day
1,672.76 1,672.76
3,741,832
3,741,832
4.50 40.20
Ib/day
40.60
Mitigated
•i 4.6657 5.2545 37.9868 i 0.0811 7.9070 i 0.0638
i 7.9708
2.1096
i 0.0598
; 2.1694
8,344.397 8,344.397 i 0.4572
0.4133 i 8,478.976
-------
; 0 ;
------
0
....... ................ •---------- ---------T-
Parking Lot 12.50 4.20
5.40 0.00
0.00
------- ---------
0.00
3 i 3 i
i i 8
---------------- + + + + + + + + *-------_ + + +
Unmitigated
4.6657 5.2545 37.9868 0.0811 7.9070 0.0638
7.9708
2.1096
0.0598
2.1694
8,344.397 - 8,344.397 - 0.4572
0.4133 8,478.976
3 3
8
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
......................................
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces
......................................------------
Parking Lot
; 1,672.76
; 0.00
; 0.00
; 1,672.76 1672.76
------------T---------- -----------------------
; 0.00 0.00
t ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
; 0.00 0.00
3,741,832
3,741,832
--------------------------
Total
1,672.76
1,672.76 1,672.76
3,741,832
3,741,832
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H -W or C -W
H -S or C -C
H -O or C -NW
H -W or C -W
H -S or C -C
H -O or C -NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass -by
Apartments Low Rise 11.00
3.50
4.50 40.20
19.20
40.60
86
11
3
........................--------------------
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 12.50
4.20 ?
5.40 r 0.00 I 0.00 T
0.00
0
-------
; 0 ;
------
0
....... ................ •---------- ---------T-
Parking Lot 12.50 4.20
5.40 0.00
0.00
------- ---------
0.00
0
--------- -----------------
0
0
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA I
LDT1 I
LDT2 I
MDV I
LHD1 I
LHD2 I
MHD I
HHD I
OBUS I
UBUS I
MCY I
SBUS I
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.534849+
0.056022:
0.172639:
0.141007:
0.026597:
0.007310:
0.011327:
0.018693:
0.000616:
0.000315:
0.024057:
0.0011001
0.005468
0.0877
+
0.0877
0.0877
1,384.611 11,384.611 1 0.0265
0.0254 1 1,392.840
Mitigated ,�
i i
003
� 1
. i 9 1 9 1
i
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces
0.534849+
0.056022:
0.172639:
0.141007:
0.026597:
0.007310:
0.011327:
0.018693:
0.000616:
0.000315:
0.024057:
0.0011001
0.005468
9 9
+
i
Parkin Lot
0.534849-
0.056022
0.172639
0.141007
0.026597
0.007310
0.011327
0.018693
0.000616
0.000315
0.024057,
0.001100
0.005468
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG
NOx
I CO
I SO2
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
NaturalGas 41 0.1269
1.0846 0.4615 6.9200e-
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
1,384.611 11,384.611 1 0.0265
0.0254 1 1,392.840
Mitigated ,�
i i
003
� 1
. i 9 1 9 1
i
i 0
NaturalGas 0.1269
1.0846 0.4615 6.9200e-
- 0.0877
0.0877
- 0.0877
0.0877
1,384.611 1,384.611 0.0265
0.0254 1,392.840
Unmitigated
003
9 9
0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
Ib/day
Ib/day
Apartments Low 1 11769.2 4 0.1269 i 1.0846 0.4615 6.9200e- 0.0877 i 0.0877 0.0877 0.0877 1,384.611 1,384.611 i 0.0265 i 0.0254 i 1,392.840
Rise 003 9 9 i 0
i i i i i i i i -------- i i i
Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
�
Asphalt Surfaces
---------------��---------------------'-------�--------A-------�-------�-------'---- --- - ---+---------------------------*
Parking Lot i 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Total
0.1269
1.0846
0.4615
6.9200e-
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
1,384.611
1,384.611
0.0265
0.0254
1,392.840
11
003
9
9
0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
Ib/day
Ib/day
Apartments Low 1 11.7692 4 0.1269 i 1.0846 0.4615 6.9200e- 0.0877 i 0.0877 0.0877 0.0877 1,384.611 1,384.611 i 0.0265 i 0.0254 i 1,392.840
Rise 003 9 9 i 0
i i i i i i i i -------- i i i
Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
�
Asphalt Surfaces
-----------r------��---------------------'-------�--------A-------�-------�-------'------- ---------------- ---------------------------*-------
Parking Lot i 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Total
0.1269
1.0846
0.4615
6.9200e-
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
1,384.611
1,384.611
0.0265
0.0254
1,392.840
11
003
9
9
0
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
I NOx
I CO
I SO2
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
Ib/day
PM10
lb/day
Ib/day
I I I
Mitigated 6.3940 0207 23.4935 1.2400e-
I I
0.1299
I 0.1299
I I 0.1299
0.1299
0000 1 0 .0409 0.0000 43.3355
003
I 1
I
I I
SubCategory
I I I I
I I I
Unmitigated
6.3940 0.2707 23.4935 1.2400e-
- 0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.0000 42.3131 42.3131 0.0409 0.0000 43.3355
I
003
'I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I
I
I
I I I I 1 I I I I I I
Landscaping •I 0.7114 I 0.2707 I 23.4935 I 1.2400e- I I 0.1299 I 0.1299 I I 0.1299 0.1299 � 1 42.3131 I 42.3131 I 0.0409 I i 43.3355
003 I I I I I 1 I I I
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
SubCategory
Ib/day
Ib/day
I Architectural 0.0000 II 0.0000II
0.3458 II II 0.0000II II 0.0000 0.0000 II 0.0000
Coating 1 I I
------------_______ _______ _______ I _______ _______ _______ _______ I --------------- i------- II _______ ________ * -------
Consumer •1 5.3368 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products
I
I I I I 1 I I I I I I
Hearth •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000
'I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I
I
I
I I I I 1 I I I I I I
Landscaping •I 0.7114 I 0.2707 I 23.4935 I 1.2400e- I I 0.1299 I 0.1299 I I 0.1299 0.1299 � 1 42.3131 I 42.3131 I 0.0409 I i 43.3355
003 I I I I I 1 I I I
'I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Total
6.3940
0.2707
23.4935
1.2400e-
0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.0000
42.3131
42.3131
0.0409
0.0000
43.3355
11
j
j
003
1
1
j
j
j
1
1
1
j
j
j
1
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
Ib/day
Ib/day
Architectural •i 0.3458 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
Consumer :1 5.3368 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - i : 0.0000 0.0000
Products i
Hearth •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000
Landscaping •i 0.7114 0.2707 23.4935 1.2400e- 0.1299 0.1299 0.1299 0.1299 i 42.3131 42.3131 0.0409 43.3355
i i i i
003
Z
Total
6.3940
0.2707
23.4935
1.2400e-
0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.0000
42.3131
42.3131
0.0409
0.0000
43.3355
11
003
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 10:59 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Summer
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators
IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Troutdale Village
Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces
7.61 + Acre
; 7.61 331,491.60
i 0
Parking Lot 560.00 Space 3.64 158,560.00 0
+
;
i
•------------------------------+----------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------I-------------------E---------------
Apartments Low Rise
284.00
Dwelling Unit
1.92 241,272.00
812
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.4 Precipitation Freq (Days) 28
Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2023
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2 Intensity 390.98 CH4Intensity 0.033 N20 Intensity 0.004
(Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Appproximately 14.57 acre apartment complex with 284 units (228,378 SF), 12,894 SF of facilites, and 560 parking spaces. Paving estimated at
25% of total site (3.64 acres).
Construction Phase - e
Off-road Equipment - Mit
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Grading -
Architectural Coating - Low VOC paint to be used
Vehicle Trips - 1,684 trips generated per day per Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis from Integrated Engineering Group
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Woodstoves - No hearths.
Area Coating - Low VOC paint to be used
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation - AB 341 requires each jurisdiction in CA to divert at least 75% of their waste away from landfills by 2020.
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitectu ral Coating
EF_ Nonresidential Exterior 250.00
40.00
---------------------g------_------------------------------r-----------------------------t--------------------------
tblArchitecturalCoatin
EF
v 250.00 40.00
-Nonresidential -Interior
----------------------------_------------------------------
tblArchitecturalCoating
r -----------------------------t--------------------------
EF Parking v 250.00 40.00
---------------------g------_------------------------------r-----------------------------t-------------------------
tblArchitecturalCoatin
EF_ Residential_ Exterior v 250.00 40.00
----------------------g------_------------------------------r-----------------------------t--------------------------
tblArchitecturalCoatin
EF_ Residential_ Interior 250.00 40.00
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------------------------------ ----------------------------- --------------------------
Area EF Nonresidential Exterior 1 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoatin
------ ------------------ ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Nonresidential Interior 1 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------ ----------------------' ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Parking v 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Residential Exterior v 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Residential Interior v 250 40
-----------------------------
tblFireplaces
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
FireplaceDayYear i 82.00 0.00
-----------------------------_-----------------------------'------------t--------------------------
tblFireplaces
FireplaceHourDay i 3.00 0.00
----------------------------- _------------------------------
tblFireplaces
r-----------------------------t--------------------------
FireplaceWoodMass 457.60 0.00
--------------p -------------_-----------------------------'
tblFire laces
-----------t--------------------------
NumberGas v 227.20 0.00
-----------------------------
tblFireplaces
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
NumberNoFireplace v 28.40 0.00
--------------p-------------_-------------------
tblFire laces
------------t--------------------------
rW
Numbeood v 28.40 0.00
-----------------------------_-----------------------------
tblLandUse
r-----------------------------t--------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet 224,000.00 158,560.00
-----------------------------_-----------------------------r-----------------------------t--------------------------
tblLandUse
Land UseSquareFeet 284,000.00 241,272.00
-----------------------------_-----------------g-----------
tblLandUse
' ------------t--------------------------
LotAcrea e i 5.04 3.64
-----------------------------_----------------------------
tblLandUse
' ------------t--------------------------
LotAcreage v 17.75 1.92
----------------------------_----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------t--------------------------
ST_TR i 8.14 5.89
----------------------------_-----------------------------'
tblVehicleTrips
------------t--------------------------
SU TR i 6.28 5.89
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------------------------ ------------------------------- --------------------------
WD TR 7.32 5.89
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
14.20
0.00
•-----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
Y ---------------------------- ---------------------------------T--------------------------
NumberNoncatalytic
} 14.20
0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
} 82.00
0.00
•----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
------------------------------ ------------------------------
WoodstoveWood Mass
999.60
--------------------------
0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission)
Unmitigated Construction
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
I
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Year
Ib/day
Ib/day
1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1
2022 •1 3.6867 38.8858 29.5518 0.0716 19.8076 1.6358 21.4210 10.1424 1.5049 11.6267 0.0000 1 7,171.161 7,171.161 1.9487 0.3428 7,291.378
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 i
1 1 1 1 1 1 I 0
1 I I I
1 1
1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1
2023 •1 63.5410 1 18.4848 1 27.3872 1 0.0701 1 3.9874 1 0.7413 1 4.7287 1 1.0703 1 0.6976 1.7679 � 0.0000 1 7,030.575 1 7,030.575 1 0.7170 1 0.3257 i 7,145.335
6 1 6 I 1 1 7
Maximum
63.5410
38.8858
29.5518
0.0716
19.8076
1.6358
21.4210
10.1424
1.5049
1177777
0.0000
7,171.161
7,171.161
1.9487
0.3428
7,291.378
1
1
1
0
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Year
Ib/day
Ib/day
1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1
2022 •1 3.6867 1 38.8858 29.5518 0.0716 7.8168 1.6358 9.4302 3.9799 1.5049 5.4642 � 0.0000 1 7,171.161 7,171.161 1.9487 0.3428 i 7,291.378
1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
1 I 1 I I I 0
1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I 1
........... �1- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J - - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - - ....... .......1- ------ J- - - - - - - J- - - - - - - J------ - ...... .
1 I I I I 1 1 I I I I
2023 •1 63.5410 1 18.4848 I 27.3872 I 0.0701 I 3.9874 I 0.7413 1 4.7287 I 1.0703 I 0.6976 1.7679 � 0.0000 1 7,030.575 17,030.575 1 0.7170 1 0.3257 i 7,145.335
6 1 6 I 1 I 7
Maximum
63.5410
38.8858
29.5518
0.0716
7.8168
1.6358
9.4302
3.9799
1.5049
5.4642
0.0000
7,171.161
7,171.161
1.9487
0.3428
7,291.378
1
1
0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
ROG
NOx
Co
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Percent
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
50.39
0.00
45.85
54.96
0.00
46.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Reduction
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
I I I I I I I I I I 1
Area •I 6.3940 I 0.2707 I 23.4935 I 1.2400e- I I 0.1299 I 0.1299 I I 0.1299 0.1299 0.0000 I 42.3131 I 42.3131 I 0.0409 I 0.0000 i 43.3355
003
I I I I
•
1I 1-
I I I I I I I I I 1
Energy •I 0.1269 I 1.0846 I 0.4615 16.9200e- I I 0.0877 I 0.0877 I I 0.0877 0.0877 1,384.611 11,384.611 I 0.0265 I 0.0254 1,392.840
003 I I I I I • I 91 g I 1 I 0
• I I I I
1 I I I I I I I I I- I I 1
Mobile •I 3.8820 I 5.5672 I 34.2286 I 0.0754 I 7.9070 I 0.0639 I 7.9709 I 2.1096 I 0.0599 2.1695 7,756.091 17,756.091 I 0.4758 I 0.4223 i 7,893.823
'I
I I I I I I I I • I 5 1 5 I 1 I 8
'I
I I I I I I I I • I I I I I
Total
10.4029
6.9225
58.1837
0.0835
7.9070
0.2815
8.1885
2.1096
0.2775
2.3871
0.0000
9,183.016
9,183.016
0.5432
0.4477
9,329.999
11
5
5
5
2
2
Mitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
I 1 I I I I I I I I 1
Area •I 6.3940 I 0.2707 1 23.4935 11.2400e- 1 1 0.1299 I 0.1299 1 I 0.1299 0.1299 � 0.0000 I 42.3131 1 42.3131 I 0.0409 1 0.0000 i 43.3355
003 I 1 I I I • 1 I I I
• I I 1
• I 1 I I I I I I I I 1
Energy I 0.1269 I 1.0846 1 0.4615 16.9200e- 1 1 0.0877 I 0.0877 1 I 0.0877 � 0.0877 � 11,384.611 1 1,384.611 I 0.0265 1 0.0254 i 1,392.840
'I I I I 003 I 1 I I I • I g I 9 I I I 0
;� I I I I I I I I • � I I 1 I
I 1 I I I I I I I I 1
Mobile •I 3.8820 1 5.5672 1 34.2286 I 0.0754 1 7.9070 1 0.0639 I 7.9709 1 2.1096 I 0.0599 2.1695 17,756.091 1 7,756.091 I 0.4758 1 0.4223 i 7,893.823
5 I 5 I I I 8
10.4029
6.9225
58.1837
0.0835
7.9070
0.2815
8.1885
2.1096
0.2775
2.3871
0.0000
9,183.016
9,183.016
0.5432
0.4477
9,329.999
777-11
5
5
2
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Phase Name
Number
Phase Type
Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days
Week
Phase Description
1 Site Preparation
ROG
NOx
c0
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
30:
158•
i
I
i
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
5:
300:
Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers
i
I
i
Percent
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Reduction
5.
20,
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase Phase Name
Number
Phase Type
Start Date End Date Num Days Num Days
Week
Phase Description
1 Site Preparation
'Site Preparation
11/1/2022
11/14/2022
5:
10:
------------------------------
i
I
i
i
; 41
2 •Grading
'Grading
11/15/2022
12/25/2022
5:
30:
158•
i
I
i
8.001
--------------
187•
3 •Building Construction
'Building Construction
12/26/2022
14/21/2023
5:
300:
Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers
i
I
i
0.40
----- ------ ------ ------ --------------------------------
4 •Paving
'Paving
14/22/2023
15/19/2023
5:
20:
8.00•
i
I
i
i
5 •Architectural Coating
:Architectural Coating
5/20/2023
6/16/2023
5.
20,
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90
Acres of Paving: 11.25
Residential Indoor: 488,576; Residential Outdoor: 162,859; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area:
29,403 (Architectural Coating — sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name I Offroad Equipment Type I Amount I Usage Hours I Horse Power I Load Factor
Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers
; 31
8.001
247:
0.40
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 41
8.001
97 •
0.37
-------------------------------------------------------
Grading +Excavators
----------------------------------
; 21
-----------------------------------------
8.001
158•
0.38
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+--------------------------
Grading 'Graders
; 11
8.001
--------------
187•
0.41
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------
-----------------------------------------
Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers
; 1y
8.00?
247•
0.40
----- ------ ------ ------ --------------------------------
*-----------------
------------ T --------------
-------------
Grading :Scrapers
2
8.00•
367•
0.48
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Grading
•Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
2
8.00-
97:
0.37
------------------------------------------------------=----------------=--------------------------r--------------
Building Construction
'Cranes
; 1 i
7.001
231 •
0.29
-----------------------------------------------------
HHDT
-----------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Building Construction
',Forklifts
; 31
8.001
89•
0.20
a_
------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------_i
-------------------------
--------------
----------------------------�
Building Construction
'Generator Sets
; 11
8.001
84•
0.74
-----------------------------------------------------
6;
' i
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
: HDT_Mix
Building Construction
+Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes
; 31
7.001
97•
0.37
-----------------------------------------------------
82.00, 0.00, 0.00, 11.00,
' i
------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
rHHDT
Building Construction
'Welders
; 11
8.001
46•
0.45
-----------------------------------------------------
i ------------------------------
------------ --------------
--------------
Paving
+Pavers
; 21
8.001
130•
0.42
-----------------------------------------------------_
------------------------------_i
-------------------------
--------------
Paving
'Paving Equipment
; 21
8.001
132•
0.36
-----------------------------------------------------_
------------------------------_i
------------ --------------
--------------
Paving
'Rollers
; 21
8.001
80•
0.38
-------------------------------------------------------*-----------------E------------r-------------
--------------
Architectural Coating
:Air Compressors
1
6.00:
78:
0.48
Trips and VMT
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip Vendor Trip Hauling Trip Worker Trip Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle Vendor Hauling
Count I Number I Number I Number I Length I Length Length Class I Vehicle Class I Vehicle Class
Site Preparation
7;
18.00 0.0010.00; 11.00;
5.40;
20.00: LD_Mix
: HDT_Mix
: HHDT
Grading
8;
i
20.00: 0.001 0.00 11.00:
5.40;
20.00:LD_Mix
;
iHDT_Mix
HHDT
--------------
--------i ---------4----------------------------------'----------r----------
Building Construction
9;
410.00 111.00: 0.00 11.00:
5.40,
20.00: LID Mix
: HDT_Mix
: HHDT
----------------------------�
--------i ---------4----------------------------------'----------r----------
Paving
6;
15.00 0.001 0.00 11.00:
5.40;
20.00: LID—Mix
: HDT_Mix
: HHDT
E
Architectural Coating ;
1 •
82.00, 0.00, 0.00, 11.00,
5.40,
20.00, LID Mix
HDT_Mix
rHHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 19.6570 i 0.0000 19.6570 10.1025 i 0.0000 10.1025 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 i 0.0380 i 1.6126 1.6126 i 1.4836 1.4836 i 3,686.061 3,686.061 i 1.1922 i 3,715.865
gi 9 5
Worker •i 0.0557 0.0381 0.4593 i 1.2500e- 0.1506 i 7.7000e- 0.1514 0.0400 i 7.1000e- 0.0407 126.9834 126.9834 i 4.0400e- 3.7900e- i 128.2149
Total
3.1701
33.0835
19.6978
0.0380
19.6570
1.6126
21.2696
10.1025
1.4836
1777
7.1000e-
3,686.061
3,686.061
1.1922
126.9834
3,715.865
3.7900e-
128.2149
003
004
004
9
1
9
5
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0557 0.0381 0.4593 i 1.2500e- 0.1506 i 7.7000e- 0.1514 0.0400 i 7.1000e- 0.0407 126.9834 126.9834 i 4.0400e- 3.7900e- i 128.2149
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0557
0.0381
0.4593
1.2500e-
0.1506
7.7000e-
0.1514
0.0400
7.1000e-
0.0407
126.9834
126.9834
4.0400e-
3.7900e-
128.2149
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 7.6662 i 0.0000 7.6662 3.9400 i 0.0000 3.9400 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 3.1701 33.0835 19.6978 i 0.0380 i 1.6126 1.6126 i 1.4836 1.4836 0.0000 i 3,686.061 3,686.061 i 1.1922 i 3,715.865
gi 9 5
Worker •i 0.0557 0.0381 0.4593 i 1.2500e- 0.1506 i 7.7000e- 0.1514 0.0400 i 7.1000e- 0.0407 126.9834 126.9834 i 4.0400e- 3.7900e- i 128.2149
Total
3.1701
33.0835
19.6978
0.0380
7.6662
1.6126
9.2788
3.9400
1.4836
5.4235
0.0000
3,686.061
3,686.061
1.1922
126.9834
3,715.865
3.7900e-
128.2149
003
004
004
9
9
5
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0557 0.0381 0.4593 i 1.2500e- 0.1506 i 7.7000e- 0.1514 0.0400 i 7.1000e- 0.0407 126.9834 126.9834 i 4.0400e- 3.7900e- i 128.2149
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0557
0.0381
0.4593
1.2500e-
0.1506
7.7000e-
0.1514
0.0400
7.1000e-
0.0407
126.9834
126.9834
4.0400e-
3.7900e-
128.2149
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 9.2036 i 0.0000 9.2036 3.6538 i 0.0000 3.6538 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 i 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 6,011.410 6,011.410 i 1.9442 6,060.015
5 i 5 i i i 8
Worker •i 0.0619 0.0423 0.5103 i 1.3900e- 0.1673 i 8.6000e- 0.1682 0.0444 i 7.9000e- 0.0452 141.0926 141.0926 i 4.4900e- 4.2100e- i 142.4610
Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
9.2036
1.6349
10.8385
3.6538
1.5041
5.1579
7.9000e-
6,011.410
6,011.410
1.9442
141.0926
6,060.015
4.2100e-
142.4610
003
004
004
5
5
8
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0619 0.0423 0.5103 i 1.3900e- 0.1673 i 8.6000e- 0.1682 0.0444 i 7.9000e- 0.0452 141.0926 141.0926 i 4.4900e- 4.2100e- i 142.4610
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0619
0.0423
0.5103
1.3900e-
0.1673
8.6000e-
0.1682
0.0444
7.9000e-
0.0452
141.0926
141.0926
4.4900e-
4.2100e-
142.4610
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2022
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Fugitive Dust 3.5894 i 0.0000 3.5894 1.4250 i 0.0000 1.4250 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 3.6248 38.8435 29.0415 i 0.0621 1.6349 1.6349 1.5041 1.5041 0.0000 i 6,011.410 6,011.410 i 1.9442 6,060.015
5 i 5 i i i 8
Worker •i 0.0619 0.0423 0.5103 i 1.3900e- 0.1673 i 8.6000e- 0.1682 0.0444 i 7.9000e- 0.0452 141.0926 141.0926 i 4.4900e- 4.2100e- i 142.4610
Total
3.6248
38.8435
29.0415
0.0621
3.5894
1.6349
5.2243
1.4250
1.5041
2.9291
0.0000
6,011.410
6,011.410
1.9442
141.0926
6,060.015
4.2100e-
142.4610
003
004
004
5
5
8
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0619 0.0423 0.5103 i 1.3900e- 0.1673 i 8.6000e- 0.1682 0.0444 i 7.9000e- 0.0452 141.0926 141.0926 i 4.4900e- 4.2100e- i 142.4610
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0619
0.0423
0.5103
1.3900e-
0.1673
8.6000e-
0.1682
0.0444
7.9000e-
0.0452
141.0926
141.0926
4.4900e-
4.2100e-
142.4610
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.7062 15.6156 16.3634 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 2,554.333 2,554.333 0.6120 2,569.632
� i i
6 i 6 i i i 2
Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
12.0434
0.7612
0.7612
0.0711
2,554.333
2,554.333
0.6120
1.1377
2,569.632
4,616.827
4,616.827
0.1106
0.3428
4,721.745
F-777
6
6
2
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.1520 4.1952 1.5825 i 0.0163 0.5571 i 0.0535 0.6105 0.1605 i 0.0512 0.2116 i 1,724.428 1,724.428 i 0.0185 0.2564 i 1,801.295
7 i 7 i i i 4
■
Worker •i 1.2681 0.8669 10.4610 i 0.0284 3.4304 i 0.0176 3.4480 0.9099 i 0.0162 0.9261 i 2,892.398 2,892.398 i 0.0921 0.0864 i 2,920.450
9 9 i 4
1.4201
5. 0621
12.0434
0.0447
3.9874
0.0711
4.0585
1.0703
0.0674
1.1377
4,616.827
4,616.827
0.1106
0.3428
4,721.745
F-777
6
6
8
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.7062 � 15.6156 16.3634 i 0.0269 0.8090 0.8090 0.7612 0.7612 0.0000 i 2,554.333 2,554.333 i 0.6120 2,569.632
6 i 6 i i i 2
Total
1.7062
15.6156
16.3634
0.0269
0.8090
0.8090
12.0434
0.7612
0.7612
0.0000
2,554.333
2,554.333
0.6120
1.1377
2,569.632
4,616.827
4,616.827
0.1106
0.3428
4,721.745
F-777
6
6
2
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.1520 4.1952 1.5825 i 0.0163 0.5571 i 0.0535 0.6105 0.1605 i 0.0512 0.2116 i 1,724.428 1,724.428 i 0.0185 0.2564 i 1,801.295
7 i 7 i i i 4
■
Worker •i 1.2681 0.8669 10.4610 i 0.0284 3.4304 i 0.0176 3.4480 0.9099 i 0.0162 0.9261 i 2,892.398 2,892.398 i 0.0921 0.0864 i 2,920.450
9 9 i 4
1.4201
5. 0621
12.0434
0.0447
3.9874
0.0711
4.0585
1.0703
0.0674
1.1377
4,616.827
4,616.827
0.1106
0.3428
4,721.745
F-777
6
6
8
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 0.0269 0.6997 0.6997 0.6584 0.6584 i 2,555.209 2,555.209 0.6079 i 2,570.406
i i i i
g
Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
Total
0.6997
0.6997
11.1432
0.6584
0.6584
0.0416
2,555.209
2,555.209
0.6079
1.1095
2,570.406
4,475.365
4,475.365
0.1004
0.3257
4,574.929
9
9
1
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.1069 3.3318 1.4738 i 0.0156 0.5570 i 0.0250 0.5820 0.1605 i 0.0239 0.1844 1,658.549 1,658.549 i 0.0171 0.2458 i 1,732.217
4 i 4 i i i 5
■
Worker •i 1.1781 0.7681 9.6694 i 0.0275 3.4304 i 0.0166 3.4469 0.9099 i 0.0153 0.9251 i 2,816.816 2,816.816 i 0.0833 0.0799 i 2,842.712
2 2 i 2
Total
1.2850
4.0999
11.1432
0.0432
3.9874
0.0416
4.0290
1.0703
0.0392
1.1095
4,475.365
4,475.365
0.1004
0.3257
4,574.929
6
6
7
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.5728 14.3849 16.2440 i 0.0269 i 0.6997 0.6997 i 0.6584 0.6584 0.0000 i 2,555.209 2,555.209 i 0.6079 i 2,570.406
g
Total
1.5728
14.3849
16.2440
0.0269
Total
0.6997
0.6997
11.1432
0.6584
0.6584
0.0000
2,555.209
2,555.209
0.6079
1.1095
2,570.406
4,475.365
4,475.365
0.1004
0.3257
4,574.929
9
9
1
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.1069 3.3318 1.4738 i 0.0156 0.5570 i 0.0250 0.5820 0.1605 i 0.0239 0.1844 i 1,658.549 1,658.549 i 0.0171 0.2458 i 1,732.217
4 i 4 i i i 5
■
Worker •i 1.1781 0.7681 9.6694 i 0.0275 3.4304 i 0.0166 3.4469 0.9099 i 0.0153 0.9251 i 2,816.816 2,816.816 i 0.0833 0.0799 i 2,842.712
2 2 i 2
Total
1.2850
4.0999
11.1432
0.0432
3.9874
0.0416
4.0290
1.0703
0.0392
1.1095
4,475.365
4,475.365
0.1004
0.3257
4,574.929
6
6
7
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 i 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 2,207.584 2,207.584 i 0.7140 � � 2,225.433
1 i 1 i i i 6
Paving •i 0.4768 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0431 0.0281 0.3538 i 1.0100e- 0.1255 i 6.1000e- 0.1261 0.0333 i 5.6000e- 0.0339 103.0543 103.0543 i 3.0500e- 2.9200e- i 104.0017
Total
1.5096
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.3538
0.5102
0.5102
6.1000e-
0.4694
0.4694
5.6000e-
2,207.584
2,207.584
0.7140
103.0543
2,225.433
2.9200e-
104.0017
003
004
004
1
1
6
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0431 0.0281 0.3538 i 1.0100e- 0.1255 i 6.1000e- 0.1261 0.0333 i 5.6000e- 0.0339 103.0543 103.0543 i 3.0500e- 2.9200e- i 104.0017
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0431
0.0281
0.3538
1.0100e-
0.1255
6.1000e-
0.1261
0.0333
5.6000e-
0.0339
103.0543
103.0543
3.0500e-
2.9200e-
104.0017
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Off -Road •i 1.0327 10.1917 14.5842 0.0228 0.5102 0.5102 0.4694 0.4694 0.0000 i 2,207.584 2,207.584 0.7140 2,225.433
i i � i
1 i 1 i i i 6
Paving �i 0.4768 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � � � 0.0000 0.0000
Total
1.5096
10.1917
14.5842
0.0228
0.0281
0.5102
0.5102
0.1255
0.4694
0.4694
0.0000
2,207.584
2,207.584
0.7140
103.0543
2,225.433
3.0500e-
2.9200e-
104.0017
003
004
1
1
6
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.0431 0.0281 0.3538 i 1.0100e- 0.1255 i 6.1000e- 0.1261 0.0333 i 5.6000e- 0.0339 103.0543 103.0543 i 3.0500e- 2.9200e- i 104.0017
003 004 004 . 003 003 i
Total
0.0431
0.0281
0.3538
1.0100e-
0.1255
6.1000e-
0.1261
0.0333
5.6000e-
0.0339
103.0543
103.0543
3.0500e-
2.9200e-
104.0017
003
004
004
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Archit. Coating •i 63.1137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 0.1917 � 1.3030 � 1.8111 i 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 281.4481 281.4481 i 0.0168 281.8690
003
Total
63.3053
1.3030
1.8111
2.9700e-
0.1536
0.0708
0.0708
0.6861
0.0708
0.0708
0.1820
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
563.3632
281.8690
0.0167
0.0160
568.5424
003
003
003
003
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.2356 0.1536 1.9339 i 5.5000e- 0.6861 i 3.3100e- 0.6894 0.1820 i 3.0500e- 0.1850 563.3632 563.3632 i 0.0167 0.0160 i 568.5424
003 003 003
Total
0.2356
0.1536
1.9339
5.5000e-
0.6861
3.3100e-
0.6894
0.1820
3.0500e-
0.1850
563.3632
563.3632
0.0167
0.0160
568.5424
003
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Mitigated Construction On -Site
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Archit. Coating •i 63.1137 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Off -Road •i 0.1917 � 1.3030 � 1.8111 i 2.9700e- 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0708 0.0000 i 281.4481 281.4481 i 0.0168 281.8690
003
Total
63.3053
1.3030
1.8111
2.9700e-
0.1536
0.0708
0.0708
0.6861
0.0708
0.0708
0.0000
281.4481
281.4481
0.0168
563.3632
281.8690
0.0167
0.0160
568.5424
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 ■ i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 0.2356 0.1536 1.9339 i 5.5000e- 0.6861 i 3.3100e- 0.6894 0.1820 i 3.0500e- 0.1850 563.3632 563.3632 i 0.0167 0.0160 i 568.5424
003 003 003
Total
0.2356
0.1536
1.9339
5.5000e-
0.6861
3.3100e-
0.6894
0.1820
3.0500e-
0.1850
563.3632
563.3632
0.0167
0.0160
568.5424
003
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
4.2 Trip Summary Information
ROG
I NOx
I CO
I SO2
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
I Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
Ib/day
1,672.76 1,672.76
3,741,832
3,741,832
4.50 40.20
Ib/day
40.60
Mitigated
•i 3.8820 5.5672 34.2286 i 0.0754 7.9070 i 0.0639
i 7.9709
2.1096
i 0.0599
; 2.1695
7,756.091 7,756.091 i 0.4758
0.4223 i 7,893.823
-------
; 0 ;
------
0
....... ................ •---------- ---------T-
Parking Lot 12.50 4.20
5.40 0.00
0.00
------- ---------
0.00
5 i 5 i
i i 8
0
Unmitigated
3.8820 5.5672 34.2286 0.0754 7.9070 0.0639
7.9709
2.1096
0.0599
2.1695
7,756.091 - 7,756.091 - 0.4758
- 0.4223 7,893.823
5 5
8
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
......................................
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces
......................................------------
Parking Lot
; 1,672.76
; 0.00
; 0.00
; 1,672.76 1672.76
------------T---------- -----------------------
; 0.00 0.00
t ---------- ---------- ---------------------------------------------------
; 0.00 0.00
3,741,832
3,741,832
--------------------------
Total
1,672.76
1,672.76 1,672.76
3,741,832
3,741,832
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles
Trip %
Trip Purpose %
Land Use
H -W or C -W
H -S or C -C
H -O or C -NW
H -W or C -W
H -S or C -C
H -O or C -NW
Primary
Diverted
Pass -by
Apartments Low Rise 11.00
3.50
4.50 40.20
19.20
40.60
86
11
3
........................--------------------
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 12.50
4.20 ?
5.40 r 0.00 I 0.00 T
0.00
0
-------
; 0 ;
------
0
....... ................ •---------- ---------T-
Parking Lot 12.50 4.20
5.40 0.00
0.00
------- ---------
0.00
0
--------- -----------------
0
0
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use
LDA I
LDT1 I
LDT2 I
MDV I
LHD1 I
LHD2 I
MHD I
HHD I
OBUS I
UBUS I
MCY I
SBUS I
MH
Apartments Low Rise
0.534849+
0.056022:
0.172639:
0.141007:
0.026597:
0.007310:
0.011327:
0.018693:
0.000616:
0.000315:
0.024057:
0.0011001
0.005468
0.0877
+
0.0877
0.0877
1,384.611 11,384.611 1 0.0265
0.0254 1 1,392.840
Mitigated ,�
i i
003
� 1
. i 9 1 9 1
i
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces
0.534849+
0.056022:
0.172639:
0.141007:
0.026597:
0.007310:
0.011327:
0.018693:
0.000616:
0.000315:
0.024057:
0.0011001
0.005468
9 9
+
i
Parkin Lot
0.534849-
0.056022
0.172639
0.141007
0.026597
0.007310
0.011327
0.018693
0.000616
0.000315
0.024057,
0.001100
0.005468
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG
NOx
I CO
I SO2
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
Ib/day
Ib/day
NaturalGas 41 0.1269
1.0846 0.4615 6.9200e-
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
1,384.611 11,384.611 1 0.0265
0.0254 1 1,392.840
Mitigated ,�
i i
003
� 1
. i 9 1 9 1
i
i 0
NaturalGas 0.1269
1.0846 0.4615 6.9200e-
- 0.0877
0.0877
- 0.0877
0.0877
1,384.611 1,384.611 0.0265
0.0254 1,392.840
Unmitigated
003
9 9
0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
Ib/day
Ib/day
Apartments Low 1 11769.2 4 0.1269 i 1.0846 0.4615 6.9200e- 0.0877 i 0.0877 0.0877 0.0877 1,384.611 1,384.611 i 0.0265 i 0.0254 i 1,392.840
Rise 003 9 9 i 0
i i i i i i i i -------- i i i
Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
�
Asphalt Surfaces
---------------��---------------------'-------�--------A-------�-------�-------'---- --- - ---+---------------------------*
Parking Lot i 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Total
0.1269
1.0846
0.4615
6.9200e-
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
1,384.611
1,384.611
0.0265
0.0254
1,392.840
11
003
9
9
0
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
Ib/day
Ib/day
Apartments Low 1 11.7692 4 0.1269 i 1.0846 0.4615 6.9200e- 0.0877 i 0.0877 0.0877 0.0877 1,384.611 1,384.611 i 0.0265 i 0.0254 i 1,392.840
Rise 003 9 9 i 0
i i i i i i i i -------- i i i
Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
�
Asphalt Surfaces
-----------r------��---------------------'-------�--------A-------�-------�-------'------- ---------------- ---------------------------*-------
Parking Lot i 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Total
0.1269
1.0846
0.4615
6.9200e-
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
0.0877
1,384.611
1,384.611
0.0265
0.0254
1,392.840
11
003
9
9
0
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
I NOx
I CO
I SO2
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
Ib/day
PM10
lb/day
Ib/day
I I I
Mitigated 6.3940 0207 23.4935 1.2400e-
I I
0.1299
I 0.1299
I I 0.1299
0.1299
0000 1 0 .0409 0.0000 43.3355
003
I 1
I
I I
SubCategory
I I I I
I I I
Unmitigated
6.3940 0.2707 23.4935 1.2400e-
- 0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.0000 42.3131 42.3131 0.0409 0.0000 43.3355
I
003
'I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I
I
I
I I I I 1 I I I I I I
Landscaping •I 0.7114 I 0.2707 I 23.4935 I 1.2400e- I I 0.1299 I 0.1299 I I 0.1299 0.1299 � 1 42.3131 I 42.3131 I 0.0409 I i 43.3355
003 I I I I I 1 I I I
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
SubCategory
Ib/day
Ib/day
I Architectural 0.0000 II 0.0000II
0.3458 II II 0.0000II II 0.0000 0.0000 II 0.0000
Coating 1 I I
------------_______ _______ _______ I _______ _______ _______ _______ I --------------- i------- II _______ ________ * -------
Consumer •1 5.3368 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Products
I
I I I I 1 I I I I I I
Hearth •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000
'I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I
I
I
I I I I 1 I I I I I I
Landscaping •I 0.7114 I 0.2707 I 23.4935 I 1.2400e- I I 0.1299 I 0.1299 I I 0.1299 0.1299 � 1 42.3131 I 42.3131 I 0.0409 I i 43.3355
003 I I I I I 1 I I I
'I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Total
6.3940
0.2707
23.4935
1.2400e-
0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.0000
42.3131
42.3131
0.0409
0.0000
43.3355
11
j
j
003
1
1
j
j
j
1
1
1
j
j
j
1
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Subcategory
Ib/day
Ib/day
Architectural •i 0.3458 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Coating
Consumer :1 5.3368 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 - i : 0.0000 0.0000
Products i
Hearth •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000
Landscaping •i 0.7114 0.2707 23.4935 1.2400e- 0.1299 0.1299 0.1299 0.1299 i 42.3131 42.3131 0.0409 43.3355
i i i i
003
Z
Total
6.3940
0.2707
23.4935
1.2400e-
0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.1299
0.0000
42.3131
42.3131
0.0409
0.0000
43.3355
11
003
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 27 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Winter
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators
IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
11.0 Vegetation
Appendix B:
CalEEMod Annual Emission Output
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 1 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Troutdale Village
Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
1.0 Project Characteristics
1.1 Land Usage
Land Uses
Size
Metric
Lot Acreage
Floor Surface Area
Population
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces
7.61 + Acre
; 7.61 331,491.60
i 0
Parking Lot 560.00 Space 3.64 158,560.00 0
+
;
i
•------------------------------+----------------------------- ------------------------------ --------------I-------------------E---------------
Apartments Low Rise
284.00
Dwelling Unit
1.92 241,272.00
812
1.2 Other Project Characteristics
Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s) 2.4 Precipitation Freq (Days) 28
Climate Zone 10 Operational Year 2023
Utility Company Southern California Edison
CO2 Intensity 390.98 CH4Intensity 0.033 N20 Intensity 0.004
(Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr) (Ib/MWhr)
1.3 User Entered Comments & Non -Default Data
Project Characteristics -
Land Use - Appproximately 14.57 acre apartment complex with 284 units (228,378 SF), 12,894 SF of facilites, and 560 parking spaces. Paving estimated at
25% of total site (3.64 acres).
Construction Phase - e
Off-road Equipment - Mit
Off-road Equipment -
Off-road Equipment -
Grading -
Architectural Coating - Low VOC paint to be used
Vehicle Trips - 1,684 trips generated per day per Troutdale Village Transportation Analysis from Integrated Engineering Group
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 2 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Woodstoves - No hearths.
Area Coating - Low VOC paint to be used
Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation -
Waste Mitigation - AB 341 requires each jurisdiction in CA to divert at least 75% of their waste away from landfills by 2020.
Table Name
Column Name
Default Value
New Value
tblArchitectu ral Coating
EF_ Nonresidential -Exterior 250.00
40.00
tblArchitecturalCoatin g
------------r-----------------------------t--------------------------
EF
v 250.00 40.00
-Nonresidential -Interior
----------------------------_------------------------------
tblArchitecturalCoating
r -----------------------------t--------------------------
EF Parking v 250.00 40.00
---------------------g------_------------------------------r-----------------------------t-------------------------
tblArchitecturalCoatin
EF_ Residential_ Exterior v 250.00 40.00
----------------------g------_------------------------------r-----------------------------t--------------------------
tblArchitecturalCoatin
EF_ Residential_ Interior 250.00 40.00
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------------------------------ ----------------------------- --------------------------
Area EF Nonresidential Exterior 1 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoatin
------ ------------------ ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Nonresidential Interior 1 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------ ----------------------' ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Parking v 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Residential Exterior v 250 40
-----------------------------
tblAreaCoating
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
Area EF Residential Interior v 250 40
-----------------------------
tblFireplaces
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
FireplaceDayYear i 82.00 0.00
-----------------------------_-----------------------------'------------t--------------------------
tblFireplaces
FireplaceHourDay i 3.00 0.00
----------------------------- _------------------------------
tblFireplaces
r-----------------------------t--------------------------
FireplaceWoodMass 457.60 0.00
--------------p -------------_-----------------------------'
tblFire laces
-----------t--------------------------
NumberGas v 227.20 0.00
-----------------------------
tblFireplaces
------------------------------ ------------t--------------------------
NumberNoFireplace v 28.40 0.00
--------------p-------------_-------------------
tblFire laces
------------t--------------------------
Numbeood v 28.40 0.00
rW
-----------------------------_-----------------------------
tblLandUse
r-----------------------------t--------------------------
Land UseSquareFeet 224,000.00 158,560.00
-----------------------------_-----------------------------r-----------------------------t--------------------------
tblLandUse
Land UseSquareFeet 284,000.00 241,272.00
-----------------------------_-----------------g-----------
tblLandUse
' ------------t--------------------------
LotAcrea e i 5.04 3.64
-----------------------------_----------------------------
tblLandUse
' ------------t--------------------------
LotAcreage v 17.75 1.92
----------------------------_----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------t--------------------------
ST_TR i 8.14 5.89
----------------------------_-----------------------------'
tblVehicleTrips
------------t--------------------------
SU TR i 6.28 5.89
-----------------------------
tblVehicleTrips
------------------------------ ------------------------------- --------------------------
WD TR 7.32 5.89
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 3 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
tblWoodstoves
NumberCatalytic
14.20
0.00
•-----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
Y ---------------------------- ---------------------------------T--------------------------
NumberNoncatalytic
} 14.20
0.00
tblWoodstoves
WoodstoveDayYear
} 82.00
0.00
•----------------------------
tblWoodstoves
------------------------------ ------------------------------
WoodstoveWood Mass
999.60
--------------------------
0.00
2.0 Emissions Summary
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 4 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.1 Overall Construction
Unmitigated Construction
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1
2022 •I 0.4098 I 3.0232 I 3.7236 19.1000e- I 0.6710 I 0.1294 I 0.8004 I 0.2222 I 0.1211 0.3433 0.0000 1823.2600 1823.2600 I 0.1041 I 0.0344 i 836.1150
I I 1 I I I I I I
003
I-
1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1
2023 •I 0.7633 I 0.8552 I 1.3016 13.1500e- I 0.1649 I 0.0355 I 0.2004 I 0.0443 I 0.0333 0.0776 0.0000 I 286.1456 1286.1456 I 0.0325 I 0.0120 i 290.5416
003 I I 1 I I I I I I
Maximum
0.7633
3.0232
3.7236
9.1000e-
0.6710
0.1294
0.8004
0.2222
0.1211
0.3433
0.0000
823.2600
823.2600
0.1041
0.0344
836.1150
003
Mitigated Construction
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Year
tons/yr
MT/yr
2022 0.4098I 3.0232 3.7236 9.1000 e-1 0.5269 0.1294I 0.6563 0.1579 0.1211 0.2790 0.0000 1823.2596 823.2596 0.1041 0.0344 836.1146
I I I I I
'1 003 I I I
1 I I I I 1 I I I I 1
2023 •I 0.7633 1 0.8552 I 1.3016 13.1500e- I 0.1649 1 0.0355 1 0.2004 I 0.0443 I 0.0333 0.0776 0.0000 I 286.1454 1286.1454 1 0.0325 I 0.0120 i 290.5414
003 I I 1 I I I I I I
Maximum
0.7633
3.0232
3.7236
9.1000e-
0.5269
0.1294
0.6563
0.1579
0.1211
0.2790
0.0000
823.2596
823.2596
0.1041
0.0344
836.1146
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 5 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Quarter
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
9-30-2022
0.7783
0.7783
4
10-1-2022
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
0.6860
0.6860
6
4-1-2023
6-30-2023
0.9272
Percent
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
17.25
0.00
14.41
24.11
0.00
15.26
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Reduction
Quarter
Start Date
End Date
Maximum Unmitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
Maximum Mitigated ROG + NOX (tons/quarter)
1
1-1-2022
3-31-2022
1.1094
1.1094
2
4-1-2022
6-30-2022
0.7698
0.7698
3
7-1-2022
9-30-2022
0.7783
0.7783
4
10-1-2022
12-31-2022
0.7821
0.7821
5
1-1-2023
3-31-2023
0.6860
0.6860
6
4-1-2023
6-30-2023
0.9272
0.9272
Highest
1.1094
1.1094
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 6 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Unmitigated Operational
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area •i 1.1011 0.0244 2.1144 1.1000e- 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117� 0.0000 i 3.4547 3.4547 3.3400e- 0.0000 � 3.5382
i i i � i �
•� 004 003 i
Energy •i 0.0232 i 0.1979 � 0.0842 i 1.2600e- i � 0.0160 i 0.0160 � i 0.0160 0.0160 6 0.0000 i 449.1043 � 449.1043 i 0.0230 � 6.4500e- i 451.6008
•� 003 . 003 i
Mobile •1 0.7146 1.0172 6.4093 0.0139 1.4154 0.0116 1.4270 0.3781 0.0109 0.3890 0.0000 i 1,300.545 1,300.545 0.0782 0.0700 � 1,323.363
i � i i � i � i � � i �
'1 • 3 i 3 i i 3
Waste 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 26.5187 i 0.0000 26.5187 i 1.5672 0.0000 i 65.6991
Water •i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 5.8704 i 65.7136 71.5840 i 0.6085 0.0149 91.2392
Total
1.8389
1.2395
8.6080
0.0153
1.4154
0.0393
1.4547
0.3781
0.0386
0.4167
32.3891
1,818.817
1,851.207
2.2801
0.0914
1,935.440
11
9
0
4
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 7 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
2.2 Overall Operational
Mitigated Operational
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
11/1/2022
11/14/2022
I
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
:2/25/2022
5:
30:
+
I
i
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Area •i 1.1011 0.0244 2.1144 1.1000e- 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0000 i 3.4547 3.4547 3.3400e- 0.0000 3.5382
i i i i
•� 004 003 i
Energy •i 0.0232 i 0.1979 � 0.0842 i 1.2600e- i � 0.0160 i 0.0160 0.0160 0.0160 0.0000 i 449.1043 449.1043 i 0.0230 6.4500e- i 451.6008
•� 003 . 003 i
0.00
0.00
Mobile •i 0.7146 1.0172 6.4093 0.0139 1.4154 0.0116 1.4270 0.3781 0.0109 0.3890 0.0000 i 1,300.545 1,300.545 0.0782 0.0700 1,323.363
i i i i i i
61.41
Waste 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.6297 i 0.0000 6.6297 i 0.3918 0.0000 16.4248
1.07
51.55
Water •i i i i 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 5.8704 i 65.7136 71.5840 i 0.6085 0.0149 91.2392
2.55
Reduction
Total
1.8389
1.2395
8.6080
0.0153
1.4154
0.0393
1.4547
0.3781
0.0386
0.4167
12.5001
1,818.817
1,831.317
1.1047
0.0914
1,886.166
9
9
2
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio -0O2
NBio-0O2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
11/1/2022
11/14/2022
5:
10:
+
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
:2/25/2022
5:
30:
+
i
Percent
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
61.41
0.00
1.07
51.55
0.00
2.55
Reduction
3.0 Construction Detail
Construction Phase
Phase
Phase Name
Phase Type
Start Date
End Date
Num Days
Num Days
Phase Description
Number
Week
1 Site Preparation 'Site Preparation
11/1/2022
11/14/2022
5:
10:
+
i
i
2 •Grading 'Grading
11/15/2022
:2/25/2022
5:
30:
+
i
_
3 'Building Construction •Building Construction
T2/26/2022 T4/21/2023
5,
300,
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 8 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4 ;Paving
;Paving
;4/22/2023
5/19/2023
5
20;
-------------------------------------------------------r------------
5 -Architectural Coating
-Architectural Coating
5/20/2023
--------------------
6/16/2023
--------
5.
-------------------------
20,
Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 15
Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 90
Acres of Paving: 11.25
Residential Indoor: 488,576; Residential Outdoor: 162,859; Non -Residential Indoor: 0; Non -Residential Outdoor: 0; Striped Parking Area:
29,403 (Architectural Coating — sgft)
OffRoad Equipment
Phase Name
Offroad Equipment Type
Amount
Usage Hours
Horse Power
Load Factor
Site Preparation 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 3!
8.001
247,
0.40
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- 4
-------------:--------------
Site Preparation +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 4:
8.00!
97,
0.37
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------
Grading +Excavators ; 2y
8.00!
158,
0.38
--------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------
Grading
Grading 'Graders ; 1
8.00!
187,
0.41
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
-------------
--------------
Grading 'Rubber Tired Dozers ; 1
8.00!
247,
0.40
------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------
Grading
Grading 'Scrapers ; 21
8.00!
367,
0.48
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
-------------
--------------
Grading +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 21
8.00!
97,
0.37
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
----------------------------
Building Construction 'Cranes ; 1
7.00!
231,
0.29
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
----------------------------
Building Construction 'Forklifts ; 3:
8.00!
89,
0.20
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - - -
-------------
--------------
Building Construction 'Generator Sets ; 1
8.00!
84,
0.74
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4
-------------
--------------
Building Construction +Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes ; 31
7.00!
97,
0.37
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
----------------------------
Building Construction 'Welders ; 1
8.00!
46,
0.45
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------
Paving +Pavers ; 2y
8.00!
130,
0.42
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
----------------------------
Paving 'Paving Equipment ; 21
8.00!
132,
0.36
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
----------------------------
Paving 'Rollers ; 21
8.00!
80,
0.38
----- ------ ------ ------ -----f -------------------------- Y-----------------F------------T-------------f
--------------
Architectural Coating :Air Compressors 1
6.00:
78:
0.48
Trips and VMT
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 9 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Phase Name Offroad Equipment Worker Trip I Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Trip Vendor Trip I Hauling Trip I Worker Vehicle I Vendor Hauling
Count I Number Number Number Length I Length Length Class I Vehicle Class I Vehicle Class
Site Preparation A
7:
18.00- 0.001 0.00; 11.00:
5.40;
20.00;LID _Mix
:HDT_Mix
i
:HHDT
--------------- �--------------�-----
Fugitive
' 1 ,
------ i------------------------------------------------------------------i----------T--------
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
Grading
8;
20.00- 0.00 i 0.00 i 11.00:
5.40;
20.00; LID Mix
HDT_Mix
:HHDT
----------------
--------------
-------------------------------4----------=----------------
Total
----
'-------------------
Total
Building Construction
9;
410.00 111.00: O.00i 11.00
5.40;
20.00;LD_Mix
iHDT_Mix
HHDT
--------------- �--------------�-----
MT/yr
------ i------------------------------- ----------------------------------
1 I 1 1
1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1
Off -Road •1 0.0159 1 0.1654 1 0.0985 1 1.9000e- 1 1 8.0600e- 1 8.0600e- 1 1 7.4200e- ; 7.4200e- 0.0000 1 16.7197 1 16.7197 , 5.4100e- 1 0.0000 i 16.8549
T--------
Paving
6;
15.00 0.00: 0.00: 11.00:
5.40;
20.00: LID Mix
i----------
HDT_Mix
: HHDT
'
' ' 1 1
0.0505
7.4200e-
0.0579
0.0000
Architectural Coating ;
1
82.00, 0.00. 0.00. 11.00.
5.40,
20.007LD_Mix
-HDT_Mix
rHHDT
3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction
Water Exposed Area
3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
1 1 I 1 1 1 1 I 1 I 1
Fugitive Dust •1 1 1 1 1 0.0983 1 0.0000 1 0.0983 1 0.0505 1 0.0000 ; 0.0505 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 1 0.0000 , 0.0000 1 0.0000 i 0.0000
1 I 1 1
1 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1
Off -Road •1 0.0159 1 0.1654 1 0.0985 1 1.9000e- 1 1 8.0600e- 1 8.0600e- 1 1 7.4200e- ; 7.4200e- 0.0000 1 16.7197 1 16.7197 , 5.4100e- 1 0.0000 i 16.8549
004 1 1 003 1 003 1 1 003 003 . 1 1 1 003 1 1
Total
0.0159
0.1654
0.0985
1.9000e-
0.0983
8.0600e-
0.1064
0.0505
7.4200e-
0.0579
0.0000
16.7197
16.7197
5.4100e-
0.0000
16.8549
004
003
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 10 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
i i
Worker 2.7000e- 2.000Oe- 2.4100e- 1.000Oe- 7.4000e- 0.0000 7.4000e- 2.000Oe- 0.0000 2.000Oe- 0.0000 0.5894 0.5894 2.000Oe- 2.000Oe- i 0.5950
�i i i i � i
004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005
0.1654
Total
2.7000e-
2.000Oe-
2.4100e-
1.000Oe-
7.4000e-
0.0000
7.4000e-
2.000Oe-
0.0000
2.000Oe-
0.0000
0.5894
0.5894
2.000Oe-
2.000Oe-
0.5950
004
004
003
005
004
003
004
004
004
003
005
005
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0383 i 0.0000 0.0383 0.0197 i 0.0000 0.0197 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Off -Road •i 0.0159 0.1654 0.0985 1.9000e- 8.0600e- 8.0600e- 7.4200e- 7.4200e- 0.0000 i 16.7197 16.7197 5.4100e- 0.0000 i 16.8549
i i
004 003 003 003 003 . 003 i
Total
0.0159
0.1654
0.0985
1.9000e-
0.0383
8.0600e-
0.0464
0.0197
7.4200e-
0.0271
0.0000
16.7197
16.7197
5.4100e-
0.0000
16.8549
004
003
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 11 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.2 Site Preparation - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
3.3 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
004
Worker 2.7000e- 2.00OOe- 2.4100e- 1.00OOe- 7.4000e- 0.0000 7.4000e- 2.00OOe- 0.0000 2.00OOe- 0.0000 0.5894 0.5894 2.00OOe- 2.00OOe- i 0.5950
�i i i i � i
004 004 003 005 004 004 004 004 005 005
0.5827
Total
2.7000e-
2.00OOe-
2.4100e-
1.00OOe-
7.4000e-
0.0000
7.4000e-
2.00OOe-
0.0000
2.00OOe-
0.0000
0.5894
0.5894
2.00OOe-
2.00OOe-
0.5950
004
004
003
005
004
004
004
004
005
005
3.3 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.1381 i 0.0000 0.1381 0.0548 i 0.0000 0.0548 ■ 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Off -Road •i 0.0544 0.5827 0.4356 i 9.3000e- 0.0245 0.0245 0.0226 0.0226 0.0000 i 81.8019 81.8019 i 0.0265 0.0000 i 82.4633
004
Total
0.0544
0.5827
0.4356
9.3000e-
0.1381
0.0245
0.1626
0.0548
0.0226
0.0774
0.0000
81.8019
81.8019
0.0265
0.0000
82.4633
004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 12 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
004
Worker •i 8.9000e- 6.5000e- 8.0400e- 2.000Oe- 2.4700e- 1.000Oe- 2.4800e- 6.6000e- 1.000Oe- 6.7000e- 0.0000 i 1.9646 1.9646 6.000Oe- 6.000Oe- i 1.9835
•� i i i i
.i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 � � i 005 i 005
� � i i i � � i �
Total
8.9000e-
6.5000e-
8.0400e-
2.000Oe-
2.4700e-
1.000Oe-
2.4800e-
6.6000e-
1.000Oe-
6.7000e-
0.0000
1.9646
1.9646
6.000Oe-
6.000Oe-
1.9835
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005
005
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Fugitive Dust 0.0538 i 0.0000 0.0538 0.0214 i 0.0000 0.0214 ■ 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Off -Road •i 0.0544 0.5827 0.4356 i 9.3000e- 0.0245 0.0245 0.0226 0.0226 0.0000 i 81.8018 81.8018 i 0.0265 0.0000 i 82.4632
004
Total
0.0544
0.5827
0.4356
9.3000e-
0.0538
0.0245
0.0784
0.0214
0.0226
0.0439
0.0000
81.8018
81.8018
0.0265
0.0000
82.4632
004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 13 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.3 Grading - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Total
0.1877
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
1.8000
Worker 8.9000e- 6.5000e- 8.0400e- 2.00OOe- 2.4700e- 1.00OOe- 2.4800e- 6.6000e- 1.00OOe- 6.7000e- 0.0000 1.9646 1.9646 6.00OOe- 6.00OOe- i 1.9835
�i i i i � i
004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 005 005
0.0890
Total
8.9000e-
6.50OOe-
8.0400e-
2.00OOe-
2.4700e-
1.00OOe-
2.4800e-
6.6000e-
1.00OOe-
6.7000e-
0.0000
1.9646
1.9646
6.00OOe-
6.00OOe-
1.9835
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005
005
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.1877 1.7177 1.8000 i 2.9600e- 0.0890 0.0890 0.0837 0.0837 ■ 0.0000 i 254.8978 254.8978 i 0.0611 0.0000 i 256.4244
003
Total
0.1877
1.7177
1.8000
2.9600e-
0.0890
0.0890
0.0837
0.0837
0.0000
254.8978
254.8978
0.0611
0.0000
256.4244
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 14 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Total
0.1877
Vendor •1 0.0171 � 0.4588 � 0.1702 i 1.7900e- � 0.0604 i 5.8700e- � 0.0663 � 0.0175 i 5.6200e- 0.0231 0.0000 i 171.9464 � 171.9464 i 1.8700e- � 0.0256 � 179.6103
•� 003 003 003 : 003
2.9600e-
Worker •i 0.1336 0.0978 1.2089 i 3.2000e- 0.3711 i 1.9400e- 0.3730 0.0985 i 1.7800e- 0.1003 0.0000 i 295.3403 295.3403 i 9.2000e- 8.7700e- 298.1836
i
•� � � � 003 003 003 003 003 i
0.0890
Total
0.1507
0.5566
1.3791
4.9900e-
0.4315
7.8100e-
0.4393
0.1160
7.4000e-
0.1234
0.0000
467.2867
467.2867
0.0111
0.0343
477.7939
003
j
003
j
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.1877 1.7177 1.8000 i 2.9600e- 0.0890 0.0890 0.0837 0.0837 ■ 0.0000 i 254.8975 254.8975 i 0.0611 0.0000 i 256.4241
003
Total
0.1877
1.7177
1.8000
2.9600e-
0.0890
0.0890
0.0837
0.0837
0.0000
254.8975
254.8975
0.0611
0.0000
256.4241
003
1
j
j
j
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 15 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2022
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling �i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
003
Vendor •1 0.0171 � 0.4588 � 0.1702 i 1.7900e- � 0.0604 i 5.8700e- � 0.0663 � 0.0175 i 5.6200e- 0.0231 0.0000 i 171.9464 � 171.9464 i 1.8700e- � 0.0256 � 179.6103
•� 003 003 003 : 003
0.5754
Worker •i 0.1336 0.0978 1.2089 i 3.2000e- 0.3711 i 1.9400e- 0.3730 0.0985 i 1.7800e- 0.1003 0.0000 i 295.3403 295.3403 i 9.2000e- 8.7700e- 298.1836
i
•� � � � 003 003 003 003 003 i
Total
0.1507
0.5566
1.3791
4.9900e-
0.4315
7.8100e-
0.4393
0.1160
7.4000e-
0.1234
0.0000
467.2867
467.2867
0.0111
0.0343
477.7939
003
003
003
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0629 0.5754 0.6498 i 1.0800e- 0.0280 0.0280 0.0263 0.0263 0.0000 i 92.7219 92.7219 i 0.0221 0.0000 i 93.2733
003
Total
0.0629
0.5754
0.6498
1.0800e-
0.0280
0.0280
0.0263
0.0263
0.0000
92.7219
92.7219
0.0221
0.0000
93.2733
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 16 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
003
Vendor •i 4.4600e- � 0.1315 � 0.0579 i 6.2000e- � 0.0220 i 1.000Oe- � 0.0230 � 6.3400e- i 9.5000e- 7.3000e- 0.0000 i 60.0771 60.0771 i 6.3000e- 8.9000e- i 62.7452
•� 003 004 003 003 004 003 : 004 003 i
Worker •i 0.0451 0.0315 0.4061 i 1.1300e- 0.1349 i 6.6000e- 0.1356 0.0358 i 6.1000e- 0.0364 0.0000 i 104.5808 104.5808 i 3.0200e- 2.9500e- i 105.5351
•� 003 004 004 003 003 i
0.6498
Total
0.0495
0.1630
0.4639
1.7500e-
0.1569
1.6600e-
0.1586
0.0422
1.5600e-
0.0437
0.0000
164.6580
164.6580
3.6500e-
0.0119
168.2804
003
003
003
003
003
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0629 0.5754 0.6498 i 1.0800e- 0.0280 0.0280 0.0263 0.0263 0.0000 i 92.7218 92.7218 i 0.0221 0.0000 i 93.2732
003
Total
0.0629
0.5754
0.6498
1.0800e-
0.0280
0.0280
0.0263
0.0263
0.0000
92.7218
92.7218
0.0221
0.0000
93.2732
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 17 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.4 Building Construction - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
3.5 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
i i
•� 004 003 003 003 003 003
Vendor •i 4.4600e- � 0.1315 � 0.0579 i 6.2000e- � 0.0220 i 1.000Oe- � 0.0230 � 6.3400e- i 9.5000e- ; 7.3000e- 0.0000 i 60.0771 60.0771 i 6.3000e- 8.9000e- i 62.7452
•� 003 004 003 003 004 003 : 004 003 i
Worker •i 0.0451 0.0315 0.4061 i 1.1300e- 0.1349 i 6.6000e- 0.1356 0.0358 i 6.1000e- ; 0.0364 0.0000 i 104.5808 104.5808 i 3.0200e- 2.9500e- i 105.5351
•� 003 004 004 003 003 i
0.0151
Total
0.0495
0.1630
0.4639
1.7500e-
0.1569
1.6600e-
0.1586
0.0422
1.5600e-
0.0437
0.0000
164.6580
164.6580
3.6500e-
0.0119
168.2804
004
003
003
003
003
003
003
003
003
3.5 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e- 5.1000e- 5.1000e- 4.6900e- ; 4.6900e- 0.0000 i 20.0269 20.0269 6.4800e- 0.0000 i 20.1888
i i
•� 004 003 003 003 003 003
• i
---------- •i--------------'--------------------------------------------------------- -------i-------'------- ------- ---------------
Paving 4.7700e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
;i ; � i i
003
Total
0.0151
0.1019
0.1458
2.3000e-
5.1000e-
5.1000e-
4.6900e-
4.6900e-
0.0000
20.0269
20.0269
6.4800e-
0.0000
20.1888
004
003
003
003
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 18 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
i i
•� 004 003 003 003 003 003
� i
---------- •i--------------'--------------------------------------------------------- -------i-------'------- ------- ---------------
Paving 4.7700e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 ; 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker 4.1000e- 2.9000e- 3.7100e- 1.000Oe- 1.2300e- 1.000Oe- 1.2400e- 3.3000e- 1.000Oe- ; 3.3000e- 0.0000 i 0.9565 0.9565 3.000Oe- 3.000Oe- i 0.9653
•� i i i i
.i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 � � i 005 i 005
� � i i i � � i �
Total
4.1000e-
2.9000e-
3.7100e-
1.000Oe-
1.2300e-
1.000Oe-
1.2400e-
3.3000e-
1.000Oe-
3.3000e-
0.0000
0.9565
0.9565
3.000Oe-
3.000Oe-
0.9653
004
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
005
005
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
I
PM2.5
Total
I
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Off -Road •i 0.0103 0.1019 0.1458 2.3000e- 5.1000e- 5.1000e- 4.6900e- ; 4.6900e- 0.0000 i 20.0268 20.0268 6.4800e- 0.0000 i 20.1888
i i
•� 004 003 003 003 003 003
� i
---------- •i--------------'--------------------------------------------------------- -------i-------'------- ------- ---------------
Paving 4.7700e- 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
;i ; � i i
003
Total
0.0151
0.1019
0.1458
2.3000e-
5.1000e-
5.1000e-
4.6900e-
4.6900e-
0.0000
20.0268
20.0268
6.4800e-
0.0000
20.1888
004
003
003
003
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 19 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.5 Paving - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- -------'-------------- '---------------
T Off -Road •i 1.9200e-
0.0130 0.0181 3.00OOe- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e- 0.0000 i 2.5571
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i
Worker 4.1000e- 2.9000e- 3.7100e- 1.00OOe- 1.2300e- 1.00OOe- 1.2400e- 3.3000e- 1.00OOe- 3.3000e- 0.0000 i 0.9565 0.9565 3.00OOe- 3.00OOe- 0.9653
•� i i i i
.i 004 004 003 005 003 005 003 004 005 004 � � � 005 i 005
� � � i i � i � �
Total
4.1000e-
2.9000e-
3.7100e-
1.00OOe-
1.2300e-
1.00OOe-
1.2400e-
3.3000e-
1.00OOe-
3.3000e-
0.0000
0.9565
0.9565
3.00OOe-
3.00OOe-
0.9653
004
004
003
005
003
005
003
004
005
004
004
005
005
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •i 0.6311 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- -------'-------------- '---------------
T Off -Road •i 1.9200e-
0.0130 0.0181 3.00OOe- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e- 0.0000 i 2.5571
� � i � i � � i � i
003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i
Total
0.6331
0.0130
0.0181
3.00OOe-
7.1000e-
7.1000e-
7.1000e-
7.1000e-
0.0000
2.5533
2.5533
1.5000e-
0.0000
2.5571
005
004
004
004
004
004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 20 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Unmitigated Construction Off -Site
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- -------'-------------- '---------------
T Off -Road •i 1.9200e-
0.0130 0.0181 3.000Oe- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e- 0.0000 i 2.5571
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i
Worker •i 2.2500e- 1.5700e- 0.0203 i 6.000Oe- 6.7500e- i 3.000Oe- 6.7800e- 1.7900e- i 3.000Oe- 1.8200e- 0.0000 i 5.2290 5.2290 i 1.5000e- 1.5000e- 5.2768
i
•� 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 004 i
0.0130
Total
2.2500e-
1.5700e-
0.0203
6.000Oe-
6.7500e-
3.000Oe-
6.7800e-
1.7900e-
3.000Oe-
1.8200e-
0.0000
5.2290
5.2290
1.5000e-
1.5000e-
5.2768
003
003
004
005
003
005
003
003
005
003
004
004
004
Mitigated Construction On -Site
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Archit. Coating •i 0.6311 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
------------------ -------------------------------------------------------- -------'-------------- '---------------
T Off -Road •i 1.9200e-
0.0130 0.0181 3.000Oe- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 7.1000e- 0.0000 2.5533 2.5533 1.5000e- 0.0000 i 2.5571
� � i � i � � i � i
003 005 004 004 004 004 . 004 i
Total
0.6331
0.0130
0.0181
3.000Oe-
7.1000e-
7.1000e-
7.1000e-
7.1000e-
0.0000
2.5533
2.5533
1.5000e-
0.0000
2.5571
005
004
004
004
004
004
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 21 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
3.6 Architectural Coating - 2023
Mitigated Construction Off -Site
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
I
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Hauling •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Vendor •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
Worker •i 2.2500e- 1.5700e- 0.0203 i 6.00OOe- 6.7500e- i 3.00OOe- 6.7800e- 1.7900e- i 3.00OOe- 1.8200e- 0.0000 i 5.2290 5.2290 i 1.5000e- 1.5000e- 5.2768
i
•� 003 003 005 003 005 003 003 005 003 004 004 i
Total
2.2500e-
1.5700e-
0.0203
6.00OOe-
6.7500e-
3.00OOe-
6.7800e-
1.7900e-
3.00OOe-
1.8200e-
0.0000
5.2290
5.2290
1.5000e-
1.5000e-
5.2768
003
003
005
003
005
003
003
005
003
004
004
4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile
1 Mitigation Measures Mobile
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 22 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
4.2 Trip Summary Information
ROG
NOx
I CO
I SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
1 1,672.76 1 1,672.76
3,741,832
3,741,832
MT/yr
Mitigated
•i 0.7146 1.0172 6.4093 0.0139 1.4154 0.0116
1.4270
0.3781
0.0109
; 0.3890
0.0000 i 1,300.545 1,300.545 0.0782
0.0700 1 1,323.363
� i i
i
i
i
i i
3 i 3 i
i
i i 3
Unmitigated
0.7146 1.0172 6.4093 0.0139 1.4154 0.0116
1.4270
0.3781
0.0109
0.3890
0.0000 1,300.545 • 1,300.545 - 0.0782
0.0700 1,323.363
3 3
3
4.2 Trip Summary Information
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose %
Land Use I H -W or C -W 1 H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by
Apartments Low Rise
11.00I 3.50
Average Daily Trip Rate
Unmitigated
Mitigated
Land Use
Weekday
--------J---------T---- - - -- --------------------- -----------------
Saturday
Sunday
Annual VMT
Annual VMT
Apartments Low Rise
........... ..................................------
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Parking Lot
; 1,672.76
+ 0.00
. . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .
; 0.00
1,672.76 1672.76
---------- ---------- ---------------------
0.00 0.00 Y
. . ----------T . . . . . . . . . . . .� . .
0.00 0.00
3,741,832
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . r
3,741,832
------------------------
. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total
1,672.76
1 1,672.76 1 1,672.76
3,741,832
3,741,832
4.3 Trip Type Information
Miles I Trip % I Trip Purpose %
Land Use I H -W or C -W 1 H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I H -W or C -W I H -S or C -C I H -O or C -NW I Primary I Diverted I Pass -by
Apartments Low Rise
11.00I 3.50
4.50
40.20 I 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 ;
•.......................•----------1---------T----------
--------J---------T---- - - -- --------------------- -----------------
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces
; 12.50 4.20
5.40
0.00 I 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
........................r----------�---------�----------�%---------------------------------------------------•---------
Parking Lot 12.50 4.20
5.40
----------------
0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0
4.4 Fleet Mix
Land Use LDA I LDT1 I LDT2 I MDV I LHD1 I LHD2 I MHD I HHD I OBUS I UBUS I MCY I SBUS I MH
Apartments Low Rise 0.534849+ 0.056022; 0.172639; 0.141007; 0.026597; 0.007310; 0.011327: 0.018693; 0.000616: 0.000315; 0.024057: 0.0011001 0.005468
+ i
Other Non -Asphalt Surfaces 0.534849' 0.056022 0.172639' 0.141007 0.026597 0.007310 0.011327 0.018693 0.000616' 0.000315 0.024057 0.001100 0.005468
CalEEMod Version: CaIEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 23 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
Parking Lot 0.534849• 0.056022: 0.172639: 0.141007: 0.026597: 0.007310: 0.011327: 0.018693: 0.000616: 0.000315: 0.024057: 0.001100; 0.005468
5.0 Energy Detail
Historical Energy Use: N
5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
Category
tons/yr
MT/yr
Electricity •1
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
i 219.8662 219.8662 0.0186
i 2.2500e- i 221.0005
Mitigated
003 i
'------- '-------
'-----
-----------------------
Electricity �
i i �
i
--'-------'-------'----------
0.000
� 0
� 0.0000
i
� 0.0000
---------'-------'-------'-------
0.0000
� 0.0000
219.8662 � 219.8662 � 0.0186
�
i 2.2500e- i 221.0005
�
Unmitigated ,�
.
i
i
003 i
NaturalGas 0.0232 i 0.1979 i 0.0842 1.2600e-
0.0160
0.0160
0.0160 0.0160
0.0000
229.2380 229.2380 4.3900e- i 4.2000e- i 230.6003
�1
Mitigated ,�
003
.
i 003
003 i
i
NaturalGas
0.0232
0.1979 0.0842 1.2600e-
-
0.0160
0.0160
-
0.0160
0.0160
0.0000
229.2380 229.2380 4.3900e-
- 4.2000e- 230.6003
Unmitigated
003
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 24 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Unmitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low 4.29576e 4 0.0232 i 0.1979 0.0842 1.2600e- 0.0160 i 0.0160 0.0160 0.0160 0.0000 i 229.2380 229.2380 i 4.3900e- i 4.2000e- i 230.6003
Rise +006 003 i 003 003
i i i i i i
----------------i�-------'-------'-------'-------- ------- '-------- -------- ------- '------------------------------ '-------'-------'-------*
Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces
Parking Lot 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Total
0.0232
0.1979
0.0842
1.2600e-
0.0160
0.0160
0.0160
0.0160
0.0000
229.2380
229.2380
4.3900e-
4.2000e-
230.6003
003
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 25 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas
Mitigated
NaturalGa
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
s Use
I
PM10
I
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Land Use
kBTU/yr
tons/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low 4.29576e 4 0.0232 i 0.1979 0.0842 1.2600e- 0.0160 i 0.0160 0.0160 0.0160 0.0000 i 229.2380 229.2380 i 4.3900e- i 4.2000e- i 230.6003
Rise +006 003 i 003 003
i i i i i i
----------------i�-------'-------'-------'-------- ------- '-------- -------- ------- '------------------------------ '-------'-------'-------*
Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces
Parking Lot 0 •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Total
0.0232
0.1979
0.0842
1.2600e-
0.0160
0.0160
0.0160
0.0160
0.0000
229.2380
229.2380
4.3900e-
4.2000e-
230.6003
003
003
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 26 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Unmitigated
Electricity
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Use
I
I
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low 1.18427e •i 210.0243 i 0.0177 2.15OOe- 211.1077
Rise i +006 003
i i
Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces
•- -- - - - - --- - - - - - -
Parking Lot 55496 •i 9.8420 i 8.3000e- 1.000Oe- 9.8927
004 004
i
Total
219.8662
0.0186
2.2500e-
221.0005
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 27 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity
Mitigated
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
Electricity
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Use
I
I
Land Use
kWh/yr
MT/yr
Apartments Low 1.18427e •i 210.0243 i 0.0177 2.15OOe- 211.1077
Rise i +006 003
i i
Other Non- i 0 •1 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces
•- -- - - - - --- - - - - - -
Parking Lot 55496 •i 9.8420 i 8.3000e- 1.000Oe- 9.8927
004 004
i
Total
219.8662
0.0186
2.2500e-
221.0005
003
6.0 Area Detail
6.1 Mitigation Measures Area
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 28 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
I NOx
I CO
I SO2
I Fugitive
PM10
Exhaust
PM10
PM10
Total
Fugitive
PM2.5
Exhaust
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
CO2e
Category
tons/yr
PM10
MT/yr
I I I
Mitigated •I 1.1011 I 0.0244 I 2.1144 I 1.1000e-
I I
I I 0.0117
I
I 0.0117
I I
I I 0.0117
� 0.0117
I I 1
� 0.0000 I 3.4547 I 3.4547 13.3400e- I 0.0000 3.5382
I I I 004
I 1
I
I I
SubCategory
. I I 003 I I
MT/yr
Unmitigated
1.1011 0.0244 2.1144 1.1000e-
- 0.0117
- 0.0117
0.0117
0.0117
0.0000 3.4547 3.4547 - 3.3400e- • 0.0000 3.5382
004
'I
I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I
Landscaping • 0.0640 0.0244 2.1144 1.1000e- 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0000 1 3.4547 3.4547 0.0000 i 3.53 82
I I I I I I I I I 13.3400e- I
'I I I I 004 I I I I I 1 I I 003 I 1
003
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Unmitigated
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
SubCategory
tans/yr
MT/yr
I I I I I I I I I I I
Architectural •1 0.0631 I I I I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000
Coating
_______________i_______I------- --------------------- *_______
I
I I I I 1 I I I I I I
Consumer •1 0.9740 I I I I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 1 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000
Products
II- I I
I I I I 1 I I I I I I
Hearth •I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I I 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 I 0.0000 i 0.0000
'I
I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I
Landscaping • 0.0640 0.0244 2.1144 1.1000e- 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0000 1 3.4547 3.4547 0.0000 i 3.53 82
I I I I I I I I I 13.3400e- I
'I I I I 004 I I I I I 1 I I 003 I 1
'I I I I I I I I I I I I I
Total
1.1011
0.0244
2.1144
1.1000e-
0.0117
0.0117
0.0117
0.0117
0.0000
3.4547
3.4547
3.3400e-
0.0000
3.5382
11
004
003
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 29 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
6.2 Area by SubCategory
Mitigated
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
ROG
NOx
CO
SO2
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM10
Fugitive
Exhaust
PM2.5
Bio- CO2
NBio- CO2
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
PM10
PM10
Total
PM2.5
PM2.5
Total
I
Subcategory
tons/yr
MT/yr
Architectural •i 0.0631 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 0.0000
Coating '� . I i
Consumer •i 0.9740 i � i i � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � i 0.0000 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 i 0.0000
Products '1 1 i
Hearth •i 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 � 0.0000 � 0.0000
Landscaping •i 0.0640 0.0244 2.1144 1.1000e- 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0000 i 3.4547 3.4547 3.3400e- 0.0000 i 3.5382
i i i i i i
004 003 i
Total
1.1011
0.0244
2.1144
1.1000e-
0.0117
0.0117
0.0117
0.0117
0.0000
3.4547
3.4547
3.3400e-
0.0000
3.5382
11
004
003
7.0 Water Detail
7.1 Mitigation Measures Water
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 30 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Total CO2
C
N20
CO2e
Category
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 71.5840
i 0.60850.0149 i 91.2392
I
I
Land Use
Mgal
- - - - - - - - �� ---- - +-----------------------------* - - - - - - -
Unmitigated •• 71.5840
0.6085 0.0149 91.2392
7.2 Water by Land Use
Unmitigated
Indoor/Out
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
door Use
I
I
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low 18.5037/ •1 71.5840 0.6085 0.0149 91.2392
Rise i 11.6654
_ i ■i
Other Non- 0/0 ■i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces-
r______it______________---------------
Parking Lot 0/0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000
Total
71.5840
j 0.6085
j 0.0149
91.2392
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 31 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
7.2 Water by Land Use
Mitigated
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
Indoor/Out
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
door Use
Land Use
Mgal
MT/yr
Apartments Low 18.5037/ •1 71.5840 0.6085 0.0149 91.2392
Rise i 11.6654
i i
__ _-r------moi r_______
Other Non- i 0/0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces
i •�
•-- J - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -
Parking Lot i 0/0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000
Total
71.5840
0.6085
0.0149
91.2392
8.0 Waste Detail
8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste
Institute Recycling and Composting Services
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 32 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
CategoryNear
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Total CO2
CH4
I N20
I CO2e
CO2e
MT/yr
Mitigated •i 6.6297 0.3918 i 0.0000 16.4248
- - - - - - - - - - - ----------------------------- --------------- - - - - - - -
Unmitigated 26.5187 1.5672 0.0000 65.6991
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Unmitigated
Waste
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Disposed
I
I
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
I 130.64 •i 26.5187 1.5672 i 0.0000 I 65.6991
Rise
--- ----'------- -------
Other Non-
i 0 :I 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces
I I
I
Parking Lot
i 0 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Total
26.5187
1.5672
0.0000
65.6991
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 33 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
8.2 Waste by Land Use
Mitigated
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators
IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
Waste
Total CO2
CH4
N20
CO2e
Disposed
I
I
Land Use
tons
MT/yr
Apartments Low
32.66 •i 6.6297 0.3918 i 0.0000 i 16.4248
Rise
• -------- -------
Non-
0 •1 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 i 0.0000
Asphalt Surfaces
i
• -'-------'-------
Parking Lot
0 •i 0.0000 0.0000 i 0.0000 0.0000
Total
6.6297
0.3918
0.0000
16.4248
9.0 Operational Offroad
Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type
10.0 Stationary Equipment
Fire Pumps and Emeraencv Generators
IEquipment Type I Number I Hours/Day I Hours/Year I Horse Power I Load Factor I Fuel Type I
Boilers
Equipment Type Number Heat Input/Day Heat Input/Year Boiler Rating Fuel Type
User Defined Equipment
Equipment Type Number
CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2020.4.0 Page 34 of 34 Date: 12/30/2021 11:00 AM
Troutdale Village - Riverside -Salton Sea County, Annual
EMFAC Off -Model Adjustment Factors for Gasoline Light Duty Vehicle to Account for the SAFE Vehicle Rule Applied
11.0 Vegetation
Appendix C:
EMFAC2017 Output
Calendar Year: 2022
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007 Categories
Units: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel Consumption
Region
Calendar Year
Vehicle Cz Model Year
Speed
Fuel
Population
Trips
Fuel Consumption
Fuel Consumption
Total Fuel Consumption
VMT
Total VMT Miles Per Gallon
Vehicle Class
South Coast AQMD
2022
HHDT
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
77.82251
1557.073
1.914672095
1914.672095
1984478.157
7970.981
13381402.09
6.74
HHD
South Coast AQMD
2022
HHDT
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
108362
1118617
1982.563485
1982563.485
13373431
South Coast AQMD
2022
LDA
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
6542832
30915701
8178.144259
8178144.259
8226568.36
2.52E+08
254602375.4
30.95
LDA
South Coast AQMD
2022
LDA
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
58937.5
279973.4
48.42410045
48424.10045
2358230
South Coast AQMD
2022
LDA
Aggregate
Aggregate
Electricity
127532.6
637025.4
0
0
5177709
South Coast AQMD
2022
LDT1
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
736905.6
3399512
1031.447408
1031447.408
1031847.287
27300896
27309932.68
26.47
LDT1
South Coast AQMD
2022
LDT1
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
387.1571
1348.408
0.39987912
399.8791198
9037.122
South Coast AQMD
2022
LDT1
Aggregate
Aggregate
Electricity
5339.042
26794.47
0
0
221507.4
South Coast AQMD
2022
LDT2
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
2246303
10535910
3436.155557
3436155.557
3453207.618
84740129
85348125.78
24.72
LDT2
South Coast AQMD
2022
LDT2
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
14234.59
70193.22
17.05206088
17052.06088
607996.5
South Coast AQMD
2022
LDT2
Aggregate
Aggregate
Electricity
22589.96
114302.6
0
0
734756.1
South Coast AQMD
2022
LHDT1
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
175903.1
2620694
598.0685493
598068.5493
821513.5103
6298251
11115258.37
13.53
LHDT1
South Coast AQMD
2022
LHDT3
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
119380.7
1501659
223.444961
223444.961
4817007
South Coast AQMD
2022
LHDT2
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
30009.92
447103.1
113.5150695
113515.0695
209067.0531
1040649
2902289.397
13.88
LHDT2
South Coast AQMD
2022
LHDT2
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
47335.63
595422.7
95.55198358
95551.98358
1861640
South Coast AQMD
2022
MCV
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
295960.1
591920.2
56.92214589
56922.14589
56922.14589
2072370
2072370.126
36.41
MCY
South Coast AQMD
2022
MDV
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
1579640
7302407
2793.799561
2793799.561
2842944.316
55888916
57233722.8
20.13
MDV
South Coast AQMD
2022
MDV
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
33348.92
163526.3
49.14475473
49144.75473
1344806
South Coast AQMD
2022
MDV
Aggregate
Aggregate
Electricity
11658.48
59625.3
0
0
391944.3
South Coast AQMD
2022
MH
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
35097.75
3511.179
64.70410395
64704.10395
76270.38211
333282.4
455641.5746
5.97
MH
South Coast AQMD
2022
MH
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
12758.81
1275.881
11.56627815
11566.27815
122359.2
South Coast AQMD
2022
MHDT
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
25445.41
509111.8
269.2842176
269284.2176
1009568.488
1367743
9307083.084
9.22
MHDT
South Coast AQMD
2022
MHDT
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
123310
1231988
740.28427
740284.27
7939340
South Coast AQMD
2022
OBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
5959.443
119236.5
49.67589796
49675.89796
88138.04214
250653.5
576603.5972
6.54
OBUS
South Coast AQMD
2022
OBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
4274.499
41607.39
38.46214418
38462.14418
325950.1
South Coast AQMD
2022
SBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
2630.829
10523.32
11.7605267
11760.5267
39328.1885
107369.8
316915.9173
8.06
SBUS
South Coast AQMD
2022
SBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
6631.313
76524.43
27.5676618
27567.6618
209546.1
South Coast AQMD
2022
UBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
952.146
3808.584
18.40085629
18400.85629
18647.65249
89256
90734.08386
4.87
UBUS
South Coast AQMD
2022
UBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
14.14142
56.56567
0.246796198
246.7961984
1478.086
South Coast AQMD
2022
UBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Electricity
17.11694
68.46776
0
1343.185
Source: EMFAC2017 (v1.0.3) Emissions Inventory
Region Type: Air
District
Region: South
Coast AQMD
Calendar Year:
2023
Season: Annual
Vehicle Classification: EMFAC2007
Categories
Units: miles/day for VMT, trips/day for Trips, tons/day for Emissions, 1000 gallons/day for Fuel
Consumption
Region Calendar Y� Vehicle
Cat Model Year
Speed
Fuel
Population
VMT
Trips
Fuel Consumption
Fuel Consumption
Total Fuel Consumption
VMT
Total VMT Miles Per Gallon Vehicle Class
South Coas
2023 HHDT
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
75.10442936
8265.097
1502.689
1.936286145
1936.286145
1913466.474
8265.097
13656273.03 7.14 HHD
South Coas
2023 HHDT
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
109818.6753
13648008
1133618
1911.530188
1911530.188
13648008
South Coas
2023 LDA
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
6635002.295
2.53E+08
31352477
7971.24403
7971244.03
8020635.698
2.53E+08
255180358.3 31.82 LDA
South Coas
2023 LDA
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
62492.97958
2469816
297086.6
49.3916685
49391.6685
2469816
South Coas
2023 LDA
Aggregate
Aggregate
Electricity
150700.3971
6237106
751566
0
0
6237106
South Coas
2023 LDT1
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
758467.6481
27812996
3504563
1023.913006
1023913.006
1024279.466
27812996
27821405.09 27.16 LDT1
South Coas
2023 LDT1
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
360.7799144
8408.618
1256.88
0.366459477
366.4594769
8408.618
South Coas
2023 LDT1
Aggregate
Aggregate
Electricity
7122.93373
303507.5
35798.19
0
0
303507.5
South Coas
2023 LDT2
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
2285150.139
85272416
10723315
3338.798312
3338798.312
3356536.438
85272416
85922778.34 25.60 LDT2
South Coas
2023 LDT2
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
15594.68309
650362.8
76635.83
17.73812611
17738.12611
650362.8
South Coas
2023 LDT2
Aggregate
Aggregate
Electricity
28809.63735
917592.8
145405.4
0
0
917592.8
South Coas
2023 LHDT1
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
174910.3847
6216643
2605904
583.3851736
583385.1736
811563.1022
6216643
11211395.79 13.81 LHDT1
South Coas
2023 LHDT1
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
125545.0822
4994753
1579199
228.1779285
228177.9285
4994753
South Coas
2023 LHDT2
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
30102.75324
1034569
448486.2
111.5753864
111575.3864
209423.5025
1034569
2969599.008 14.18 LHDT2
South Coas
2023 LHDT2
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
50003.13116
1935030
628976.5
97.84811618
97848.11618
1935030
South Coas
2023 MCY
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
305044.5141
2104624
610089
57.849018
57849.018
57849.018
2104624
2104623.657 36.38 MCY
South Coas
2023 MDV
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
1589862.703
55684188
7354860
2693.883526
2693883.526
2744536.341
55684188
57109879.73 20.81 MDV
South Coas
2023 MDV
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
36128.1019
1425691
176566.9
50.65281491
50652.81491
1425691
South Coas
2023 MDV
Aggregate
Aggregate
Electricity
16376.67653
537591.7
83475.95
0
0
537591.7
South Coas
2023 MH
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
34679.50542
330042.9
3469.338
63.26295123
63262.95123
74893.26955
330042.9
454344.9436 6.07 MH
South Coas
2023 MH
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
13122.69387
124302
1312.269
11.63031832
11630.31832
124302
South Coas
2023 MHDT
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
25624.3151
1363694
512691.3
265.2060557
265206.0557
989975.6425
1363694
9484317.768 9.58 MHDT
South Coas
2023 MHDT
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
122124.488
8120623
1221858
724.7695868
724769.5868
8120623
South Coas
2023 DEUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
5955.291639
245774
119153.5
48.07750689
48077.50689
86265.88761
245774
579743.8353 6.72 DEUS
South Coas
2023 DEUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
4286.940093
333969.8
41558.29
38.18838072
38188.38072
333969.8
South Coas
2023 SBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
2783.643068
112189.6
11134.57
12.19474692
12194.74692
39638.85935
112189.6
323043.5203 8.15 SBUS
South Coas
2023 SBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
6671.825716
210853.9
76991.94
27.44411242
27444.11242
210853.9
South Coas
2023 UBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Gasoline
957.7686184
89782.63
3831.074
17.62416327
17624.16327
17863.66378
89782.63
91199.2533 5.11 UBUS
South Coas
2023 UBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Diesel
13.00046095
1416.622
52.00184
0.239500509
239.5005093
1416.622
South Coas
2023 UBUS
Aggregate
Aggregate
Electricity
16.11693886
1320.163
64.46776
0
1320.163