1996 05 21 CC Minutes+ LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
May21, 1996
Regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council of May 21, 1996 was called to order
at the hour of 3:00 p.m. by Mayor Holt, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
PRESENT: Council Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Holt
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC COMMENT
Mr. Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, thanked the City for getting started with the
traffic signal installation at Adams Street and Miles Avenue and questioned the status
of the Highway 111/Washington Street intersection project
* * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Ms. Patty Newman, 36 Duke Drive, Rancho Mirage, Trustee of Palm Springs Desert
Museum, spoke regarding their Raising the Roof" campaign and discussed the
museum's expansion and success. She encouraged the City to support the museum's
educational programs.
* *** * * * * * *
Mr. Michael Daily, 52-404 Avenida Rubio, of the Living Desert, thanked the City for
its support and asked the Council to continue supporting the Living Desert, pointing
out that La Quinta school children benefit by way of providing free field trips to the
Reserve as well as the new after-school programs they sponsor at the Boys & Girls
Club.
Ms. Trice Healy, 54-455 Eisenhower Drive, continued to believe that a pool is still
needed and she asked the Council to reconsider their recent reappropriation of some
of the pool funds.
* * * * * * * * *
Mr. Dutch Dilsaver, 78-835 Dulce Del Mar, encouraged the Council to improve the
City's entrance on Washington Street to draw new residents and businesses to the
community.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 2 May 21, 1996
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Confirmed
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to approve the City
Council Minutes of April 30, 1996 as submitted, Motion carried unanimously.
Council Member Adolph advised of a correction on Page 5 of the May 7, 1996
Minutes.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to approve the City
Council Minutes of May 7, 1996 with Page 5, paragraph 6, corrected to read Council
Member Adolph......recommended that the smaller sign on the side of the canopy be
eliminated." Motion carried unanimously.
ANNOUNCEMENTS None
PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Holt and the Council presented Art Achievement Awards to the following
students of La Quinta Middle School for their artwork displayed at the Civic Center:
Grad?6 Grade7 Grade 8
Emily Boltinghouse
Nathan Love Luke Freas Nathan Cook
Paul Pescador Josh Gregg Paul Francis
Thomas Johnson Hinano French
Wendy McCoy Carol Pedraza
James Patterson Nathan Quick
Joey Reiver Matthew Ruiz
Ilinca Vladescu Alex Schriener
Marissa Zarate
WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE None
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 3 May21, 1996
BUSINESS SESSION
CONSIDERATION OF A RECOMMENDATION BY THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
COMMISSION TO APPROVE A PROPOSAL BY RANCHO LA QUINTA FOR
ARTWORK TO BE INSTALLED AT THE CORNER OF AVENUE 48 AND
WASHINGTON STREET AND TO APPROPRIATE $70,000 FROM THE ART IN
PUBLIC PLACES FUND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE ART PIECE.
Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that the Art in Public
Places Commission APP) has recommended approval of Rancho La Quinta's
proposed artwork to be located at the corner of Avenue 48 and Washington
Street. The developer will pay the artist, Mr. Bill Ware, a total of $70,000 for
the artwork and is requesting a reimbursement of $35,000 paid to-date into the
APP Fund and $35,000 in credits against future building permits. The
developer's total contribution to the APP Fund is expected to well exceed
$70,000 over the life of the development, noting that contributions will
commence again after the $35,000 in credits are satisfied. He advised that the
artwork would be made of layered aluminum, brass, and bronze and consist of
a horse and conquistador Don" that extends 16 feet to the top of the Don"
from the horse's hindquarters and 18 feet tQ the top of the flag. Fake boulders
will be used to secure the artwork.
In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Herman advised that the location
of the monument sign would not change and the sales sign would stay as long
as the development is under construction.
Council Member Adolph was concerned about the art piece not looking three-
dimensional from all sides.
Mr. Herman advised that it would be similar to the metal artwork in front of the
Palm Desert Sheriff's Station.
In response?to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Herman advised?that the top of the
flag would be 24 feet above the level of the street and the setback for the
artwork would be 1 5 feet from the sidewalk.
Mr. Bill Ware, 73-891 Messon Street, Palm Desert, the artist for the project,
advised that the slightly-curved art piece would be made of Y2" aluminum
layers, resulting in a three-to-four-inch wide look. The horse will be made of
solid aluminum and the Don" of bronze, brass, and copper, and if Council
approves, the height of the flag will be extended some. He advised that the
fake boulders would be used to secure the art piece.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 4 May21, 1996
In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Ware advised that he submitted his
design to the APP after hearing that they were looking for submittals for this
project.
Council Member Henderson felt that the proposed artwork was synopsis with
the development's logo, pointing out that it was referred to in the APP Minutes
as their logo. She had a problem with crossing the line in permitting logos in
artwork and felt that it gets into the sign ordinance regulations. She advised
that according to the APP Minutes of April 1, Mr. Cullinan called the art piece
a corner monument sign and pointed out that the City's monument signs will
only be 7'-4' high and 1 6'-6" long. She was concerned about this project
setting a precedent for future projects and was also concerned about ownership
and responsibility for maintaining the artwork. She felt that it would be difficult
to carry out the APP's purpose of providing art throughout the City, if the APP
funds collected from a development are spent entirely on that particular project.
She suggested holding a public forum as outlined in the APP Work Plan to gain
input from the community regarding artwork for this project, hoping especially
to gain input from the business community, given the logo concern of the art
piece. She wished to be cautious in allowing the door to be opened to similar
requests in the future.
Mr. Ware displayed both the logo for Rancho La Quinta and the proposed
artwork, pointing out what he felt was a drastic difference between the two.
He felt that the artwork reflects the theme of the development and that there's
a vast difference between a logo and a theme. He presented photos of other
sites where artwork has been used to display certain themes.
Council Member Henderson advised that Rancho La Quinta has used the Don
very actively in their advertising campaign.
Mr. Herman advised that under the APP Ordinance, the developer may provide
artwork in-lieu of paying the APP fee or may apply for a 100% credit against
the APP fees for the artwork and installation costs. An agreement would
provide for the developer to maintain the artwork for public view for a minimum
of 25 years. He advised that Rancho La Quinta is asking to be reimbursed for
the $35,000 they've already paid into the APP Fund so that they can pay the
artist $70,000 for the artwork. The remaining $35,000 will be issued as
credits against their future building permits.
Mayor Holt asked for clarification regarding the ownership of the artwork since
the APP would be issuing a check for $35,000 toward the art piece.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 5 May21, 1996
Mr. Herman felt that Rancho La Quinta would probably own the artwork and be
responsible for maintaining it for 25 years.
Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that the APP ordinance provides various
ways to handle such arrangements.
Mr. Tom Cullinan, 73-385 Juniper, Palm Desert, representing Rancho La Quinta,
commented that they are also concerned about beautifying the Washington
Street corridor. He advised that the artwork would reflect La Quinta's Spanish
theme and be a real asset to the community.
Council Member Perkins felt that this attractive art piece would set that corner
off. He didn't have any problem with the height of the artwork and although
he appreciated Council Member Henderson's concerns about whether or not it's
a logo, he liked the project and wished to see it move forward.
Council Member Sniff supported the APP decision and was pleased that the
artwork was designed by a local artist. He felt that such an exciting and eye-
catching art piece would reflect the spanish theme of the City, noting that the
La Quinta Hotel has had two conquistadors at their entrance for many years.
He didn't have any problem with the size or location of th& art piece and
supported it 100%.
Council Member Adolph was also pleased with the selection of a local artist and
didn't have any problem with the size of the art piece. He felt that the spear
should probably extend a little higher, but not as high as the drawing illustrates.
He supported the APP's recommendation.
In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Herman advised that funds would not
be issued until an agreement is signed between the City and Rancho La Quinta
that provides for Rancho La Quinta to own and maintain the art piece for public
view for a period of 25 years.
Mayor Holt expressed appreciation for Council Member Henderson's hard work
in researching the various issues that come before the Council. She also
supports the APP.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to approve the art
piece as submitted and instruct staff to appropriate funds in an amount not to
exceed $70,000 from the Art in Public Places Fund to construct the art piece
$35,000 from future building permit credits and $35,000 from the APP Fund).
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 6 May21, 1996
Council Member Henderson advised that she would not support the motion.
She felt that the art piece was magnificent and was not opposed to it, but she
was opposed to the door that she believes the Council is opening by virtue of
the avenue used to approve this project.
Motion carned with Council Member Henderson voting NO. MINUTE ORDER
NO.96-77.
2. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST BY THE ART IN PUBLiC PLACES
COMMISSION TO ALTER THE DESIGN OF THE ARTWORK FOR THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 AND WASHINGTON STREET FOR
THE ONE ELEVEN LA QUINTA SHOPPING CENTER.
Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that in 1993, the
Council approved two art pieces for the One Eleven La Quinta Shopping Center.
The art piece that will be located at the northeast corner of Highway 111 and
Washington Street was approved with a concrete base and stainless steel
pyramids with a gem in the middle. The second art piece is similar, but on a
smaller scale and will be located near the future theater. The artist, Mr. Louis
DeMartino, has requested a change in the material, using bronze instead of steel
for the pyramids to better reflect the colors in the mountains. The change has
been approved by the Art in Public Places Commission APP). The artist
contracted with the developer to construct and install the two art pieces for
$107,000, of which $95,000 will come from the APP Fund and the balance
from the developer.
In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Herman advised that he wasn?t
aware of any change in the material for the gem.
Council Member Henderson pointed out that only $14,000 would be left for the
second sculpture if $28,000 is transferred to the first art piece. She questioned
how additional funds might be allocated for the second art piece should it be
needed and asked if the theater and shopping center is expected to generate
additional revenues for the APP Fund.
Mr. Herman advised that the project is expected to generate additional
revenues for the APP Fund. Any additional funds for the second art piece would
have to be approved by the APP and the Council.
In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Herman advised that the current
request is to shift monies trom one art piece to another.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 7 May 21,1996
Mr. Louis DeMartino, P.O. Box 391370, Anza, advised that there would be
some change to the color of the cement and by using bronze for the pyramids,
they would provide a variegated reflection of the mountain colors. A light wheel
beneath the pyramid will provide a gravitational look at night. He felt that the
project's landscaping is essential in providing the oasis appearance.
Council Member Adolph supported the use of bronze and asked about the
concrete finish to which Mr. DeMartino responded that it would be finished
mostly with an acid-etching technique.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to approve the
request as submitted by the Art in Public Places Commission One Eleven La
Quinta Center). Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.96-78.
3. CONSIDERATION OF DATE TREE GROVE LOCATION HAMMER TREES.
Mr. Speer, Senior Engineer, advised that on May 7, 1996, the Council approved
a Grant of Easement Deed Agreement that provided rights-of-way on the west
side of Dune Palms Road and obligated the City to remove/relocate 80+ date
palm trees from that right-of-way, and naming the grove of trees after the
Hammer family if relocated. The three potential permanent sites discussed by
the Council at the last meeting are: 1) the south side of Calle Tecate, 2) the
Bear Creek Bike Path, and 3) the Civic Center campus. The Calle Tecate site
would accommodate 80 trees 25 feet apart? at a relocation cost of $32,000
and irrigation installation cost of $10,000. The Bear Creek Bike Path would
accommodate 60 trees at a relocation cost of $24,000. However, the Bear
Creek Bike Path Urban Reforestation Project calls for California fan palms and
not date trees. The 1993 Civic Center Master Plan calls for 100 ornamental
palm trees, with date palms being intentionally omitted because of the thorns
and dates. The relocation cost for moving 80 trees to the Civic Center would
be $32,000 and $10,000 to install irrigation. The trees would possibly have
to be moved a second time to accommodate revisions to the Civic Center
Master Plan. If the trees are moved to City property north of the Fritz Burns
Park for temporary storage, relocation costs would be $48,000 to $64,000
because of having to move them twice. Staff presented two alternative sites
that are both located on the alluvial fan south of Calle Tecate. The first site is
900 feet south of Calle Tecate and south of the man-made drainage swale and
the second site is on the west side of the alluvial fan near the rock croppings.
If the Council decides to not relocate the trees, they may be disposed of by the
School District's subcontractor who would probably recycle them into the
market.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 8 May21, 1996
In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Speer advised that it would cost an
additional $4,000 to $5,000 to install the irrigation if two separate Sites are
selected.
Council Member Adolph felt that the trees should be used at the Civic Center
and Bear Creek Bike Path to keep the City from having to buy trees later on. He
felt that any revisions to the Civic Center Master Plan could be worked around
the trees.
Mr. Cosper, Public Works Director, advised that some of the trees could be
placed in a grove on the Civic Center site in accordance with the Master Plan
and some along the Bear Creek Bike Path.
Council Member Adolph didn't think the thorns and dates would be a problem
if the trees were placed in a grove.
Council Member Sniff stated that the Council had previously agreed during
discussion of the Civic Center Master Plan, that date trees weren't appropriate
for the Civic Center site. He would consider placing a small grove of date trees
in a low-traffic area later on, but preferred using trees in better shape and more
uniform in type, pointing Out that these trees are older and somewhat
neglected, consisting of different varieties. He felt that the Calle Tecate site
would be the best place to put the trees, advising that more proper spacing
would be 30 feet instead of 25 feet, and suggested placing smaller ones in
clusters at each end. He felt that several of the trees would be lost during
relocation.
Council Member Henderson appreciated Council Member Adolph's economic
concerns, but felt that any trees placed at the Civic Center site would be in the
way of underground work. She liked the Calle Tecate site, but was also
interested in the alternate site at the base of the mountain. She was concerned
that some of the residents might complain about view obstruction if the trees
are planted along Calle Tecate.
Council Member Sniff felt that that's why significant spacing is important. He
wished to place them along Calle Tecate first and then at the Bear Creek Bike
Path, Civic Center, or base of the mountain if any are left.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Cosper advised that it would
cost approximately $22,000 to install irrigation along Calle Tecate and out to
the base of the mountain.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 9 May21, 1996
In response to Mayor Holt, Mr. Speer advised that the sight line from the north
side of Calle Tecate to Martinez Mountain is approximately an 18% incline and
the sight line below the palm fronds of a 25-foot tree would be a 25% incline.
Mr. Cosper was concerned about the number of trees that might be lost during
relocation and recommended that they be spaced 50 feet apart along Calle
Tecate and if any are left, place them in the oasis.
Council Member Perkins supported spacing the trees 50 feet apart, but was
concerned that placing the trees on the plateau might obstruct the view and
suggested that any surplus be placed along the Bear Creek Bike Path instead.
Council Member Sniff was concerned that the natural environment of the
plateau area would be disturbed during maintenance of the trees.
Council Member Perkins didn't feel that the trees along the Bear Creek Bike Path
would require much maintenance.
Council Member Henderson advised that she was more interested in placing the
trees at the base of the mountain instead of the plateau.
Council Member Sniff supported placing the largest trees along Calle Tecate at
50-foot centers and the remainder along the Bear Creek Bike Path or in the
Hidden Oasis area.
Council Member Adolph didn't believe that the visual aspect would be a problem
along Calle Tecate. He suggested using a few of the trees in the traffic areas
in that area.
Council Member Perkins was against placing any of the trees at the Civic Center
because of the probability of having to move them again.
MOTION It was moved by Council Member Sniff/Mayor Holt to support Option
No. 1, placing the Hammer trees immediately along the south side of Calle
Tecate, using the largest and best ones for that area and that whatever are left
over in suitable condition be located either along the Bear Creek Bike Path
Reforestation Project or in a hidden oasis generally as outlined, south of Calle
Tecate with the first priority being the Bike Path. Motion carried unanimously.
MINUTE ORDER NO.96-79.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 10 May21, 1996
4. CONSIDERATION OF GOLF-CART CROSSING ON PARK AVENUE.
Mr. Speer, Senior Engineer, advised that KSL Recreation has requested approval
of a golf-cart crossing on Park Avenue, 700 feet north of Calle Tampico, to
provide a golf-cart travel route for their members from Santa Rosa Cove and
Duna La Quinta to the Citrus Golf Course Clubhouse. The proposed crossing
meets the criteria set forth by the California Vehicle Code which requires it to
be determined safe by the local law enforcement agency, perpendicular to the
street, used only during daylight hours, and the golf course must be adjacent to
the street. The sight distance at the crossing is 1,030 feet to the north and
700 feet to the south, providing 13-1? seconds for carts to cross the street and
CalTrans' minimum recommendation is 7Y2 seconds. The traffic signals at each
end of the street increases the average gap time of 8 seconds to 10-12 seconds
for golf carts to cross the street during peak traffic hours. The Sheriff's Office
recommends giving the right-of-way at the crossing to vehicular traffic instead
of golf carts. Giving the right-of-way to golf carts could delay traffic on Park
Avenue, cause golf-cart drivers to be less alert, and would be more expensive
to implement due to installation of flashing warning lights. The City must grant
an access easement back to KSL to implement this crossing.
In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Speer advised that the crossing
meets the conditions set forth in the California Vehicle Code which allows golf
carts to cross the street at the crossing without being registered for the street.
Council Member Perkins supported giving the right-of-way to vehicular traffic
and felt that all of the signs should be approved by the City Engineer. He was
concerned about golf carts assuming that traffic would stop and suggested that
vehicular right-of-way be posted.
Mr. Speer advised that club members would be notified of crossing regulations
on an annual basis by KSL.
Mr. Cosper, Public Works Director, advised that right-of-way signage would be
placed on each side of the street.
In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Cosper advised that the worse-case
scenario for the number of carts crossing the street would be a maximum of
two carts every seven minutes during peak golfing hours.
Council Member Henderson pointed out that the crossing is for clubhouse
access only and suggested using arrows in the crossing to indicate the proper
crossing area for golf carts.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 11 May21, 1996
Mr. Cosper advised that the crossing would have curb openings to indicate the
proper crossing area.
In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Speer reviewed the access route from
Santa Rosa Cove and Duna La Quinta to the Citrus Golf Course.
Mayor Holt supported Alternative No.1 as recommended by staff.
RESOLUTION NO.96-31
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, CONDITIONALLY APPROVING INSTALLATION OF A GOLF-CART
CROSSING ON PARK AVENUE APPROXIMATELY 700 FEET NORTH OF CALLE
TAMPICO.
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No.96-31
as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
5. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR A
PROPOSITION 70 URBAN FORESTRY GRANT TO PLANT TREES IN VARIOUS
LOCATIONS IN THE CITY.
Staff report is on file in the City Clerk's Office.
RESOLUTION NO.96-32
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION FOR FUNDS FOR THE URBAN
FORESTRY GRANT PROGRAM UNDER THE CALIFORNIA WILDLIFE, COASTAL,
AND PARK LAND CONSERVATION BOND ACT OF 1988 FOR THE TREES FOR
LIFE PROJECT
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No.96-32
as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
6. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPLICATION FOR 5B821 BICYCLE AND
PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS GRANT FOR SIDEWALKS-BIKEPATHS AT VARIOUS
LOCATIONS ALONG CALLE TAMPICO
Staff report is on file in the City Clerk's Office.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 12 May21, 1996
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to approve the
application for SB821 Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Grant for sidewalks at
various locations along Calle Tampico. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE
ORDER NO 96-80.
7. CONSIDERATION OF ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENTS TO BE SUBMITTED TO
COACHELLA VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT FOR
CONSIDERATION BY THE DISTRICT BOARD.
Ms. Nicholson, Parks & Recreation Director, advised that in 1995, the Coachella
Valley Recreation & Park District CVRPD) allocated $100,000 for recreation
improvements within the La Quinta area and in April, 1 996, the Council
approved 65,000 worth of improvements at the Sports Complex. A list of
suggested improvements and estimated costs for the remaining $35,000 are
included in the staff report. The items have been ranked in priority by the Parks
& Recreation Commission. The Commission also expressed their concern about
the lack of restroom facilities at the parks although the funding is insufficient
to address the need at this time. Staff recommended that the Council approve
the list of improvements and direct staff to forward the list to CVRPD.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Ms. Nicholson advised that the list
has been discussed with CVRPD.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Genovese, City Manager,
advised that many of the items have been contemplated by the City, but when
funds were made available, they were added to this list.
Council Member Adolph was supportive of the list of suggestions.
In response to Council Member Perkins, Ms. Nicholson advised that two of the
tennis courts are somewhat separated from the others and would be resurfaced
for roller hockey and basketball. Additional funding may be requested in the
future to install other improvements such as fencing around the roller hockey
and basketball courts.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to approve the list
of capital improvements as recommended for additional improvements to be
submitted to the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District for consideration.
Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.96-81.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+
City Council Minutes 13 May21, 1996
8. CONSIDERATION OF PARTICIPATION IN THE JULY 4TH GREATER DESERT
FIREWORKS EVENT.
In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Weiss, Assistant City Manager,
advised that the City allocated $1,000 for the event last year.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to contribute
$1 000 from the Special Projects Contingency Account to the Greater Desert
Fireworks Committee for the July 4, 1996 event. Motion carried unanimously.
MINUTE ORDER NO.96-82.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED MAY 21, 1996.
2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURY REPORT DATED MARCH 31, 19g6 FOR THE
CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY.
3. AWARD OF CONTRACT SPORTS COMPLEX LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS
PROJECT NO.96-02.
4. APPROVAL OF COMMUNITY USE OF ATHLETIC FIELDS AGREEMENT.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff?AdoIph to approve the
Consent Calendar as recommended. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE
ORDER NO.96-83.
STUDY SESSION
1. DISCUSSION REGARDING DESIGN CONCEPT VARIOUS CITY-WIDE
LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO.96-04.
Mr. Freeland, Senior Engineer, advised that on February 20, 1996, the Council
awarded a contract to David Evans & Associates for landscape design services
for the sound-wall extension on Washington Street and median improvements
as follows: Eisenhower Drive Calle Nogales to Calle Montezuma), Washington
Street Frontage Road, Calle Tampico Washington Street to Eisenhower Drive),
Washington Street Avenue 47 to Avenue 48), CaIle Sinaloa Avenida Bermudas
to Eisenhower Drive), Washington Street and east side right-of-way Avenue 52
to evacuation channel), and Avenue 50 Eisenhower Drive to Washington
Street).
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 14 May21, 1996
He advised that the concept plans were approved by the Planning Commission
on April 23, 1 996. The overall landscaping theme is consistent with the
General Plan for primary-image corridors and secondary-image corridors and
both corridors will have accent lighting and colored, brick-patterned, stamped
concrete island noses. The primary-image corridor islands will have designated
art-feature pads. Based on receiving authorization to receive bids on July 18,
1996, the bid opening will be held August 16, 1996 and construction will begin
mid-September and end mid-December. Bids for the Washington Street medians
from Avenue 52 to the evacuation channel and the Avenue 50 medians will be
requested as add-alternates.
In response to Council Member Adolph, Mr. Freeland advised that provisions
would be made for electrical and plumbing for the art-feature pads.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Henderson to approve the
conceptual design for the various City-wide landscape improvements Project
No.96-04. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.96-84.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS ITEMS
1. DISCUSSION OF CULTURAL COMMISSION.
Council Member Perkins requested that this item be continued to June 1 8,
1996.
Ms. Judy Vossler, 46-555 Cameo Palms, advised that the Cultural Commission
made several revisions to the Minutes of their last meeting and they will
approve those Minutes at their next meeting.
Council recessed to Redevelopment Agency meeting and Closed Session to and until
the hour of 7:00 p.m.
CLOSED SESSION
1. Conference with labor negotiator, Tom Hartung. regarding negotiations with La
Quinta City Employees Association pursuant to Government Code Section
54957.6 Meet and Confer Process.
2. Conference with legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(c) regarding potential litigation one case).
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 15 May21, 1996
3. Conference with legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(b)(3)(C) regarding potential litigation one case).
4. Conference with legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(a) regarding on-going litigation Granite Construction, Case No.
086195.
5. Conf?rence with legal counsel pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(a) concerning on-going litigation Paul Berlier and Anthony Silva
Case No.089180.
6. Evaluation of Council-appointed position City Manager pursuant to
Government Code Section 54957.6.
7:00P.M.
PUBLIC COMMENT None
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. WEED ABATEMENT/LOT CLEANING ASSESSMENTS FOR PLACEMENT ON
1996/97 TAX ROLLS.
a. Stemmer, Joe W. & Vicky APN 774-301-005 $187.50
b. Feingold, Julian F. APN 774-301-006 $187.50
c. Patton, James J. & Eileen APN 773-174-002 $187.50
d. Santa Fe Designs APN 773-312-001 $187.50
e Raub, Sondra L. APN 773-242-002 $187.50
f. Nesman, Margaret A. APN 773-174-007 $187.50
g. Baza, Thomas P. & Nancy L. APN 773-171-011 $187.50
h. Richards, Charles & Ann APN 769-116-003 $187.50
i. Sobel, Harry & Jeffrey APN 773-222-002 $187.50
APN 773-222-003 $187.50
j. Riley, William R. APN 773-201-014 $187.50
k. Hamilton Supply APN 773-313-005 $187.50
APN 773-313-006 $187.50
I. Riley, William R. APN 774-295-015 $187.50
APN 774-295-016 $187.50
Mr. Hartung, Building & Safety Director, advised that payments have been
received for Items b, e, i, and k.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 16 May21, 1996
The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. There being no one wishing
to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED.
RESOLUTION NO.96-33
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA.
CALIFORNIA, ASSESSING LIEN AND PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION ON TAX
ROLLS ON CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC
NUISANCE.
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Adolph to adopt Resolution No.96-33
as amended. Motion carried unanimously.
2. PUBLIC MEETING CONCERNING LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT 89-1 FISCAL YEAR 1996197.
Mr. Cosper, Public Works Director, advised that on April 2, 1996, the Council
adopted resolutions, declaring the City's intention to levy annual assessments
for Landscape & Lighting Assessment District 89-1 for Fiscal Year 1 996/97 and
scheduling two meetings a public meeting on May 21, 1996 wherein affected
property owners are given an opportunity to ask questions regarding said
assessments and a public hearing will be held on June 4, 1996 to receive public
testimony and written protests at which time the Council may decide to lower
the fees or maintain the fees as recommended in the Engineer's Report. The
Engineer's Report includes a description of services provided through the
District, necessary costs to provide such services, diagram of the boundaries of
the various districts, and an assessment schedule. This year's Assessment
District will have a City-wide benefit zone and six local benefit zones. The
number of Equivalent Dwelling Units EDU) decreased this year from 23,522 to
23,207 and the assessment increased from $43/EDU last year to $43.34/EDU.
The total revenue last year was $1,011,446 and this year it is estimated at
$1,005,781.
Parcels in Annexation Area No.9 have been given a new definition, Vacant and
Remote Non-Residential Parcels, and the rate has been adjusted to 50% of the
current Vacant Non-Residential parcel rate. The basement cap to the annual CPI
adjustment was increased this year from 0% to 2.5% with a maximum CPI
adjustment of 5%.
In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Cosper advised that the number of
EDU's decreased because of the change in Annexation Area No.9.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 17 May21, 1996
The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. There being no one wishing
to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED.
No action was taken.
REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
Noted and filed.
DEPARTMENT FIEPORTS
C-i. COUNCIL SUMMER SCHEDULE.
Mrs. Juhola, City Clerk, asked the Council for direction in regards to the summer
meeting schedule.
Council concurred on canceling the second meeting of August and the first
meeting of September.
A-2. REPORT ON LIBRARY FUNDING AND OPERATIONS.
In response to Council Member Henderson, Mr. Genovese, City Manager,
advised that a copy of this report was forwarded to Ms. Atkins who is the
City?s representative on the Library Advisory Board.
In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Genovese advised that CVAG's
Technical Advisory Committee TAC) is looking into arranging some type of
valley-wide meeting to review this issue and is talking to the County about
releasing funds as well.
F-i. THREE-MONTH UPDATE ON SUNLINE BUS PASS SALES.
Council Member Sniff questioned the benefit of the program.
Council Member Henderson supported having the passes available for the public,
but questioned if it was worth the paperwork involved to collect the
commissions. She suggested that the Chamber of Commerce be contacted
about selling passes and making them available at the Senior Center.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 18 May21, 1996
Mr. Genovese, City Manager, advised that this program is viewed as a service
to the community. The Chamber will be contacted regarding their possible
involvement.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS....................continued
2. DISCUSSION OF LIABILITY INSURANCE FOR COUNCIL MEMBERS AND
COMMISSION MEMBERS.
Council Member Perkins asked if there is any provision of liability insurance for
Council Members, noting that his personal liability insurance policy no longer
covers him as a Council Member because his insurance company considers him
an employee of the City.
Mr. Genovese, City Manager, advised that the Council is covered by errors and
omissions insurance. A report outlining that coverage will be presented to
Council at the next meeting.
3. DISCUSSION OF SUMMER INTRA-CITY BUS SERVICE.
Council Member Henderson advised that SunLine is not in a position to expand
their programs at the present time, but she has looked into the possibility of an
intra-city bus service as a temporary summer program that would help transport
residents within the City. She asked if there was a consensus of the Council
to have staff look into the possibility further.
Council Member Adolph understood that SunLine was willing to work with the
City on this program, but that the City would be responsible for the funding
whether it's successful or not. SunLine has suggested that passes be sold up
front to determine the viability of the program and if the temporary program is
found unviable, the program could be dropped.
Council Member Henderson advised that six trips a day through the City, five
days a week would cost approximately $37,000 for a five-week period.
In response to Mayor Holt, Council Member Henderson advised that no estimate
has been made regarding reimbursement of revenues through bus passes,
pointing out that that's one aspect of the program that still needs to be
determined because the City might wish to fund it as a recreational program.
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02
+City Council Minutes 19 May 21, 1996
Mayor Holt pointed out that summer school might generate a lot of bus-pass
sales.
Council Member Henderson advised that the Lake Cahuilla pool is not open
every day, but she hoped that would change and pointed out that the bus
route could be adjusted according to the Lake's pool schedule.
Council Member Perkins felt that it's worth investigating, but was concerned
about the liability issues involved and who would be responsible for watching
the children.
Council Member Adolph felt that it might be a viable program for summer
school.
Council Member Sniff wasn't supportive of pursuing the program, pointing out
that bus service to the high school pool last summer didn't work. He didn't
believe that people would go to the Lake because of the heat and didn't feel
that transportation for seniors or summer school students was a problem.
Council Member Henderson advised that many seniors who previously attended
the Senior Center on Highway 111 no longer attend because there no bus
service.
Council Member Perkins pointed out that this program might give us an idea
of how much demand there is for a pool and supported looking into it.
Council concurred on directing staff to report back to the Council within the
next month on the pros and cons of an intra-city bus service.
Council recessed to Closed Session as delineated on Page 14.
Council reconvened with no decision being made which requires reporting pursuant
to Section 54957.1 of the Government Code Brown Act).
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
AUNDRA L. JUH LA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
BIB]
06-18-1996-U01
07:30:09AM-U01
CCMIN-U02
05-U02
21-U02
1996-U02