The URL can be used to link to this page

SDP 2016-0005 SRR-Talus Hotel, Spa, Residences, Conference Center, Bighorn Sheep Fence - CC RES 2016-051 - CC Staff ReportPUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: DECEMBER 20, 2016 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT A RESOLUTION TO (1) MODIFY PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005, INCLUDING THE SITE PLAN, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING FOR PLANNING AREAS 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE SILVERROCK SPECIFIC PLAN IN RESPONSE TO APPEAL 2016-0004; AND (2) SUSTAIN FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2014-1003; PROJECT LOCATION - SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 52 AND JEFFERSON STREET RECOMMENDATION Adopt a Resolution to (1) modify the Planning Commission's approval of Site Development Permit 2016-0005 (and related site plan, architectural design and landscaping for planning areas 2, 3, and 4 of the SilverRock Specific Plan; project location - southwest corner of Avenue 52 and Jefferson Street) by adding Condition of Approval CC-1, and (2) sustain the Planning Commission's finding of consistency with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • SilverRock Development Company, LLC (SDC) proposes a Site Development Permit for a 140 room luxury hotel, 29 hotel -branded residences, a spa, a meeting and conference center, and a shared service facility. • On October 25, 2016, the Planning Commission approved Site Development Permit 2016-0005 (SDP). • On November 8, 2016, the Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity, through their counsel Wayne Brechtel (collectively, the appellant), filed an administrative appeal of the Planning Commission decision to approve the SDP and the finding of consistency with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003. FISCAL IMPAC Y The cost to implement the Condition of Approval CC-1 is estimated at $350,000- $450,000; this is the cost to install and maintain temporary fencing for a two year period. Potential future costs would entail constructing permanent fencing, which may be reimbursed in whole or in part by SDC. Staff will obtain bids for a permanent fence as necessary, which will be reviewed by Council. 125 BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS SDC (the applicant) submitted the application for the SDP that underlies this appeal. The City has entered into a Purchase, Sale, and Development Agreement and statutory Development Agreement, both dated November 19, 2014 (collectively, the agreements), with SDC that set forth terms and conditions for the sale and development of the undeveloped portions of the SilverRock property (Attachment 1 and 2). The SDP is a proposal for a 140 room luxury hotel, 29 hotel -branded residences, a spa, a meeting and conference center, and a shared service facility in planning areas 2, 3, and 4 of the SilverRock Specific Plan (Attachment 3). The appellant appeals the Planning Commission's approval of the SDP on the grounds that the City must enforce adopted mitigation measures and other contractual requirements under the agreements that will have a temporary or permanent fence (barrier) constructed to protect peninsular bighorn sheep (PBS) prior to the further advancement of the project. The appeal and letter from appellant's counsel is Attachment 4. The project is designed with midcentury modern architecture exhibited by low-rise buildings with clean, sharp horizontal and vertical planes, and large expanses of glass to take advantage of surrounding views. The site areas and development parameters are provided in the Table below (please also see page A-1.0 of Attachment 3). Table 1 SDP 2016-0005 Development Parameters Planning Area # Acres Development Proposed 2 23.6 140 room hotel 13,083 s.f. spa building Restaurant (re -use of the Ahmanson House) 3 13.9 29 luxury -branded residences 4 9.1 7,279 s.f. Meeting Center 34,738 s.f. Conference Center 21,978 s.f. Shared Services Facility The hotel is proposed in Planning Area 2 as a 140 room resort complex arranged in clusters of units around the golf course, accessed by walkways for pedestrian and golf cart use. The hotel lobby and its associated pool area will provide the activity hub for the property, while the hotel units will be separated and remain a quiet enclave. A spa facility will be nestled against the mountains, northwest of the lobby area, and will provide a restful, quiet location for spa services. A luxury -branded residential development consisting of 29 independent residences is proposed in Planning Area 3 and arranged to provide expansive views of the golf course and mountains with access to hotel services. Parking for the residential units is provided within the cul-de-sac, and is not dependent on the central parking area at the conference center. A meeting and conference center (in two building areas) and a shared service facility are proposed north of the hotel in Planning Area 4, and immediately south and adjacent to SilverRock Way. The meeting center is intended to house small, conference 126 room facilities, while the conference center will accommodate larger groups. The shared services facility will provide a centralized "back of house" service facility for all current and future uses on the property. This area also centralizes all the parking for the project. The planting palette incorporates a number of native species, and will blend well with the natural backdrop of the Santa Rosa Mountains and the golf course. The planting palette has been reviewed for consistency with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) permitted and prohibited planting list, to assure that the project's adjacency to the Santa Rosa Mountains Conservation Area does not introduce inappropriate plant species. On October 25, 2016, the Planning Commission approved the SDP for planning areas 2, 3, and 4 of the SilverRock Specific Plan. After the Planning Commission decision, the appellant filed an appeal to the City Council pursuant to La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.120. Pursuant to that section, the City Council may refuse to consider issues which were not raised by the appellant or another person either by verbal testimony or written correspondence made at or before the time the Planning Commission approved the SDP. Staff recommends, however, that the City Council consider all of the issues raised in the appellant's notice of appeal to fully address the concerns raised and which are covered by the proposed modification to the Planning Commission's decision. All of appellant's issues and staffs responses are addressed under "Staff Analysis of Appeal" (below). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed project was reviewed under the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The Design & Development Department (Department) determined that the application is a "project" as defined by CEQA. However, the Department also found that Environmental Assessment 2014-1003 reviewed amended plans for the SilverRock Specific Plan, and that the currently proposed project is consistent with what was reviewed and approved in 2014. While the appeal references reports about deaths and illness befalling PBS - which City staff takes seriously for purposes of mobilizing a response as part of this appeal - the conditions that gave rise to the mitigation measures and contractual obligations under the agreements to construct a temporary or permanent barrier have not substantially changed since Environmental Assessment 2014-1003 or the related underlying Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA 2002-453 or MND) and related Addendum thereto (EA 2006-568 or 2006 Addendum). Specifically, the conditions that gave rise to mitigation measure of a temporary or permanent 8-foot fence or functional equivalent is based on the mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan to protect PBS from entering non -mountainous portions of the SilverRock property. The mountainous/toe-of-slope condition and buffer/mitigation concept has not changed. No substantial changes have been made to the project when compared to the 2014 analysis, and the previously approved Environmental Assessment 2014-1003, including its mitigation measures and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Attachment 5), will be applied to the currently proposed project, thereby resulting in less than significant impacts to the environment. 127 Furthermore, the proposed Condition of Approval CC-1 for the SDP (the Appeal Condition CC-1), which may be approved by the City Council on appeal pursuant to La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.120(D)(6) and may be incorporated into all of the other conditions of approval attached to the SDP, places further specificity and hard deadlines for the construction of a temporary and permanent 8-foot fence or functional equivalent (barrier) for the protection of PBS. The proposed condition is intended to address the concerns raised in the appeal "by constructing a fence, either temporary or permanent, prior to more sheep deaths occurring[]" and prior to the SilverRock development advancing. Appeal Condition CC-1, if approved by the City Council, furthers the already resulting less than significant impacts to the environment through the mitigation measures attached to the SDP. The proposed text of Appeal Condition CC-1 is Attachment 7. STAFF ANALYSIS OF APPEAL Each of the appellant's grounds for appeal is provided below, along with staffs analysis. Appellant's ground for appeal is underlined, and staffs response is in plain text. The order of the grounds for appeal follows the order in the notice of appeal. Please note that staff has taken into account the whole of the record, including written submittals before and during the Planning Commission meeting, oral testimony, and the attachments to the appeal application. Violation of Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan for allowing take of sheep and failing to build sheep barrier. The appellant states that the City is in violation of the CVMSHCP for failing to take measures to restrict bighorn sheep use of existing urban development. The appeal cites CVMSHCP 8.2.4.1 item 14, which requires the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC) to determine the location of a barrier to sheep access within two years of receiving a written notice by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW (previously Dept. of Fish and Game)) that PBS are using artificial sources of food or water in unfenced areas of existing urban development near a conservation area. CVMSHCP 8.2.4.1 item 14 also requires that CVCC (or local permittee to the extent it agreed) to cause to be constructed such a barrier within two years of that notice. The conservation areas for PBS are undeveloped portions of La Quinta and depicted in Attachment 6. The City does not concede that it violated the CVMSHCP for allowing (or even causing) an alleged take of PBS or for failing to build a sheep barrier. The City did impose a requirement that construction of a sheep barrier must occur and included SDP Condition of Approval No. 54, consistent with the mitigation measure of EA2014-1003 for the construction of a temporary and permanent fence as follows: If Bighorn Sheep enter into the Project Site, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be I I centimeters (4.3 inches) or less. If determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If the Agency transfers or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the 128 Agency shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. In addition, Appeal Condition CC-1 has been prepared for consideration of the administrative appeal with the following benchmarks for the 8-foot high fence construction: Temporary Fencing • Construction bids solicited within 15 business days after the decision on the administrative appeal. • Temporary fencing construction begins within 21 days after an award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder with completion within 30 days. • Temporary fence construction shall be complete prior to issuance of any grading, demolition, construction, or building permit. Permanent Fencing • A permanent fence or functional equivalent shall be constructed prior to the grand opening of the SilverRock Resort, as defined. The anticipated date of the grand opening is May 2019. Sheep fence construction will occur along the portion of the toe -of -slope of the SilverRock development to provide an adequate barrier between PBS in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area and the artificial sources of food and water at the project site. The fence will adjoin the existing fence constructed by the Coachella Valley Water District along the southwestern portion of the SilverRock development. Furthermore, with respect to the time frame under CVMSHCP 8.2.4.1 item 14 by which CVCC must determine the location of and cause to be constructed a sheep barrier, the efforts to determine the location and cause that construction are underway. City staff anticipates analysis of sheep barrier protection in the City of La Quinta by the CVCC with completion of a draft environmental impact report (EIR) being prepared by CVCC. The EIR will analyze various alternatives for sheep barrier protection that may include barrier locations that do not border the SilverRock development but still would serve to protect PBS from entering the SilverRock property from the mountainous area. If the CVCC adopts an alternative method or location with the EIR, a permanent barrier at SilverRock may not serve to protect PBS. Proposed Condition of Approval CC-1 provides that alternative methods for PBS protection may be used by the City and/or applicant in -lieu of permanent fencing if, upon review of environmental impacts, they are consistent with approvals needed by USFWS, CDFW, and CVCC. If no alternative methods for PBS protection are available or approved by the necessary government agencies with approval authority, the default provision in proposed Condition of Approval CC-1 is to complete the permanent fencing or functional equivalent before the grand opening of the SilverRock Resort. Violation of previous city approvals issued for this project for failing to comply with conditions requiring a sheep barrier. Construction of the planning areas 2, 3, 4 of the SDP has not occurred and is subject to the conditions of approval, including construction of an 8-foot fence for protection of PBS. Also, there have not been violations of the agreements because construction of 129 the identified planning areas has not commenced. The terms and conditions of the agreements ensure compliance by the developer with the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (Attachment 5) for the construction of a temporary or permanent fence as part of any development of the SilverRock Resort. Nevertheless, the approval of Appeal Condition CC-1 would establish benchmarks for construction of the required fencing prior to issuance of grading, demolition, construction or building permits. Issuance of permits is anticipated to occur by March 2017 and grading will begin by April 2017 pursuant to the Purchase, Sale and Development Agreement (PSDA). Appeal Condition CC-1 goes above and beyond what is required under the PSDA by having the City immediately begin the process for bidding, awarding, and constructing the 8-foot temporary or permanent fence. Violation of California Environmental Quality Act for failing to supplement the environmental review due to changed conditions and new information. The City included sheep fence construction as a condition of approval of the SDP consistent with environmental mitigation measures for the project. Appeal Condition CC-1 has been prepared for consideration by the Council and establishes benchmarks for immediate fence construction consistent with required measures by the CVMSHCP and written notice provided by the USFWS and the CDFW on February 28, 2014. Furthermore, as discussed above, there have not been changed conditions that require any environmental review beyond that which has already occurred in connection with the project. The conditions that gave rise to the mitigation measures and contractual obligations under the agreements to construct a temporary or permanent barrier have not substantially changed since Environmental Assessment 2014-1003 or the related underlying MND and 2006 Addendum. As identified in the appeal, mitigation measures identified in the MND and 2006 Addendum were based on the following environmental conditions: 1. A mount toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan has been prepared to protect peninsular big horn sheep, and other wildlife, from entering the non - mountainous portion of the site [SilverRock property] proposed for development. The concept plan illustrates a continuous buffer to the toe -of -slope in areas where development could occur adjacent to the mountain edge. The concept plan delineates the location, acreage and native plant species envisioned for the mitigation area. This plan shall be incorporated into the project design and shall be subject to review by the City prior to the issuance of grading permits. A copy of this mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan is available for review at the City of La Quinta Community Development Department. 2. If Bighorn Sheep enter onto the Project Site, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less. If determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If the Agency [City] transfer or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the Agency shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if 130 needed in the future. (MND, pp.16-17, as quoted in appeal p.12; 2006 Addendum, pp.28-29, as quoted in appeal p.14.) Those conditions have not changed. As quoted in the appeal, PBS would enter the project site from mountainous areas at the toe -of -slope, and was again referenced in Environmental Assessment 2014-103 (the 2014 Addendum): Essential habitat of the peninsular bighorn sheep in this area [SilverRock property] was defined by the USFWS to include the Santa Rosa Mountains down to the tow - of -slope. As no development was proposed to infringe above the toe -of -slope, no portion of the 2002 MND Project Site would have been developed in the essential peninsular bighorn sheep habitat. Nonetheless, mitigation measures were identified for the 2002 MND Project should peninsular bighorn sheep encroach on the 2002 MND Project Site. (EA 2014-103, as quoted in appeal p.15.) In sum, the conditions that gave rise to mitigation measure of a temporary or permanent 8-foot fence or functional equivalent is based on the mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan to protect PBS from entering non -mountainous portions of the SilverRock property. The mountainous/toe-of-slope condition and buffer/mitigation concept has not changed. No substantial changes have been made to the project when compared to the 2014 analysis, or for that matter the MND and 2006 Addendum. Violation of California Environmental Quality Act for failing to enforce mitigation measures requiring sheep barrier The appeal states that the City is the agency responsible for ensuring compliance with mitigation measures for constructing the fence during project implementation. The City recognizes that the applicant has obligations for the construction of a temporary or permanent fence as part of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the SilverRock Resort and under the agreements. However, CVCC is the agency responsible for ensuring compliance with the CVMSHCP to the extent a barrier (8-foot fence or functional equivalent) goes beyond the SilverRock property. In this regard, the City is aware that CVCC is preparing the EIR for protection of PBS for areas in the City of La Quinta including the toe -of -slope along the project site, and staff is of the understanding that the EIR will analyze alternative methods for protection of PBS that may include alternative barrier locations where the CVCC has the ability to obtain permission/access to the necessary lands, and any such alternative method(s) is approved by USFWS, CDFW, and CVCC. For purposes of the SilverRock property and mitigation measures that apply to SilverRock, the City has complied with CEQA requirements to have the temporary or permanent fence integrated into any development of the SilverRock Resort under the SDP as approved by the Planning Commission. Nevertheless, as described above, Appeal Condition CC-1 goes beyond the mitigation measures that reduce environmental impacts to less than significant levels by giving further specificity for the construction of a temporary sheep fence to begin immediately, should the City Council modify the SDP by adding Appeal Condition CC-1. Additionally, Appeal Condition CC-1 gives further specificity as to the deadline by which a permanent fence must be completed if no other feasible alternatives are allowed by USFWS, CDFW, and CVCC. 131 Violations of fully protected mammal act for allowing take of sheep No take of sheep occurred with the approval of the SilverRock Specific Plan and EA 2002-453, EA 2006-568, or EA 2014-1003, which included mitigation measures for protection of bighorn sheep and did not require construction of a sheep barrier prior to any improvements related to the development of the Specific Plan. SDP Condition of Approval No. 54 requires construction of the sheep fence as part of the proposed development of planning areas 2, 3, and 4. Moreover, approval of Appeal Condition CC-1 will ensure immediate construction of the fencing and address the primary concern of the appellant: The construction of a fence, either temporary or permanent, be completed prior to more sheep deaths occurring. While proposed Appeal Conditions CC- 1 could immediately assist with curbing a potential take of PBS, the City does not concede that the lack of a temporary or permanent fence at SilverRock, or any action taken or not taken by the City in connection with SilverRock property, caused an alleged take of PBS. Violations with endangered species act for allowing taking of sheep No take of sheep occurred with the approval of the SilverRock Specific Plan and EA 2002-453, EA 2006-568, or EA 2014-1003, which included mitigation measures for protection of bighorn sheep and did not require construction of a sheep barrier prior to any improvements related to the development of the Specific Plan. SDP Condition of Approval No. 54 requires construction of the sheep fence as part of the proposed development of planning areas 2, 3, and 4. Moreover, approval of Appeal Condition CC-1 will ensure immediate construction of the fencing and address the primary concern of the appellant: The construction of a fence, either temporary or permanent, be completed prior to more sheep deaths occurring. While proposed Appeal Conditions CC- 1 could immediately assist with curbing a potential take of PBS, the City does not concede that the lack of a temporary or permanent fence at SilverRock, or any action taken or not taken by the City in connection with SilverRock property, caused an alleged take of PBS. Violation of the public trust The appeal curtly references a violation of the public trust without background information or analysis explaining the grounds for any alleged violation. Regardless, the City did not violate the public trust because it did not authorize any take of PBS with the approval of the SDP. Also, as discussed above, no take of sheep occurred with the approval of the SilverRock Specific Plan and EA 2002-453, EA 2006-568, or EA 2014- 1003, which included mitigation measures for protection of PBS and did not require construction of a sheep barrier prior to any improvements related to the development of the Specific Plan. SDP Condition of Approval No. 54 requires construction of the sheep fence as part of the proposed development of planning areas 2, 3, and 4. Moreover, approval of Appeal Condition CC-1 will ensure immediate construction of the fencing and address the primary concern of the appellant: The construction of a fence, either temporary or permanent, be completed prior to more sheep deaths occurring. While proposed Appeal Conditions CC-1 could immediately assist with curbing a potential take of PBS, the City does not concede that the lack of a temporary or permanent fence at 132 SilverRock, or any action taken or not taken by the City in connection with SilverRock property, caused an alleged take of PBS. AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Agency Review The applicant's request for the SDP was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies on May 31, 2016. The appellant's notice of appeal was received by the City Clerk and sent to all applicable City departments. All written comments received at the Planning Commission and City Council appeal will be or are on file and available for review with the Design and Development Department. Planning Commission Review At its regular meeting of October 25, 2016, the Planning Commission heard testimony and approved the SDP with attached conditions of approval and finding of consistency with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003. City Council Review Pursuant to La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.120(D)(6)(a), the City Council may modify the Planning Commission's decision for the SDP, without referring the SDP back to the Planning Commission, by adding and incorporating by reference Appeal Condition CC-1 with all other conditions of approval and actions taken by the Planning Commission. ALTERNATIVES Pursuant to La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.200.120(D)(6), the City Council may: • Sustain or reverse the Planning Commission decision without modification. • Continue this appeal for further consideration. • Refer the application back to the Planning Commission with directions. Prepared by: Gabriel Perez, Planning Manager Approved by: Timothy R. Jonasson, P.E., Design and Development Director/City Engineer Attachments: 1. Project Information Form 2. Project Area Site Map 3. Site Development Permit Plan Set 4. Appeal application from Wayne Bechtel dated November 8, 2016 5. SilverRock Resort Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 6. Map of Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Conservation Areas 7. Proposed Condition of Approval CC-1 for Site Dev. Permit 2016- 0005 133 134 RESOLUTION 2016 — A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, MODIFYING THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S APPROVAL OF SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A 140 ROOM HOTEL, SPA, 29 HOTEL -BRANDED RESIDENCES, A MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER AND SHARED SERVICES FACILITY WITHIN THE SILVERROCK SPECIFIC PLAN BY ADDING CONDITION OF APPROVAL CC-1 AND SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMISSION'S FINDING OF CONSISTENCY WITH ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2014-1003 CASE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 APPELANT: WAYNE BRECHTEL WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 25th day of October, 2016, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by SilverRock Development Company, LLC, for approval of a hotel, spa, conference center and shared services facility generally located on the southwest corner of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52, more particularly described as: APN: 776-150-022, 777-490-011, 770-200-026, 776-150-021, 776-150-023, 777-490-007, 777-490-001, 777-490-012, 777-490-014, 777-490-018 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 14, 2016 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 20th day of December, 2016, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider an appeal by Mr. Wayne Brechtel of SDP2016-0005. WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1. Consistency with General Plan and SilverRock Specific Plan The land use is consistent with the General Plan land use designation of Tourist Commercial. The proposed project is also consistent with the SilverRock Specific Plan, and implements the goals, policies and development standards of the Specific Plan. 135 City Council Resolution 2016 - Appeal 2016-004 of Site Development Permit 2016-0005 Adopted: Page 2 of 4 2. Consistency with Zoning Code The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City's Zoning Code and/or SilverRock Specific Plan, as applicable. The Site Development Permit has been conditioned to ensure compliance with the zoning standards and other supplemental standards as established in Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. 3. Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) The Design and Development Department has determined that this project is consistent with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003 and no further environmental review is required. 4. Architectural Design The architectural design of the project, including, but not limited to, the architectural style, scale, building mass, materials, colors, architectural details, and roof style are compatible with the architectural guidelines of the SilverRock Specific Plan and the quality of design prevalent in the city. 5. Site Design The site design of the project, including, but not limited to, project entries, interior circulation, pedestrian and bicycle access, pedestrian amenities, screening of equipment and trash enclosures, and exterior lighting, are consistent with the SilverRock Specific Plan and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. 6. Landscape Design Project landscaping, including, but not limited to, the location type, size, color, texture and coverage of plant materials, has been designed so as to provide visual relief, complement buildings, visually emphasize prominent design elements and vistas, screen undesirable views, provide a harmonious transition between adjacent land uses and between development and open space, and enhance the visual continuity of the project. The landscape design will be consistent with the established landscape guidelines for the SilverRock Specific Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 136 City Council Resolution 2016 - Appeal 2016-004 of Site Development Permit 2016-0005 Adopted: Page 3 of 4 SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That it does hereby sustain the Planning Commission's determination that Site Development Permit 2016-005 is consistent with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003. SECTION 3. That it does hereby modifies the Planning Commission's decision approving Site Development Permit 2016-0005, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval and Exhibit A. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on this the 20th day of December, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SUSAN MAYSELS, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California (CITY SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: 137 City Council Resolution 2016 - Appeal 2016-004 of Site Development Permit 2016-0005 Adopted: Page 4 of 4 WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 138 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 1 of 17 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: Riverside County Fire Marshal La Quinta Public Works Development Division (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form - Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) Design & Development Department Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department Desert Sands Unified School District Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Imperial Irrigation District (IID) California Water Quality Control Board (CWQCB) State Water Resources Control Board SunLine Transit Agency SCAQMD Coachella Valley The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 3. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant; who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City 139 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 2 of 17 prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 4. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2012- 0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP"). The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant's SWPPP shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any on or off -site grading being done in relation to this project. C. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. D. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 140 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 3 of 17 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. E. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. F. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City. G. The inclusion in the Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post - construction BMPs as required; and the applicant shall execute and record an agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs is required. 5. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 6. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 7. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. Said 141 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 4 of 17 conferred rights shall also include grant of access easement to the City of La Quinta for the purpose of graffiti removal by City staff or assigned agent in perpetuity and agreement to the method to remove graffiti and to paint over to best match existing. The applicant shall establish the aforementioned requirements in the CC&R's for the development or other agreements as approved by the City Engineer. 8. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over proposed and/or existing private streets that access public streets and open space/drainage facilities. 9. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street rights -of - way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 11. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan and provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access For Individual Properties and Development) for public streets. A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Construct right turn deceleration lane at all access points where there is a peak hour right -turn volume of 50vph. The deceleration lane length shall be as specified in Engineering Bulletin 06-13. 2) Jefferson Street (Major Arterial) - Construct a traffic signal or roundabout at the project entrance off Jefferson Street at such time that warrants are met. PARKING LOTS and ACCESS POINTS 12. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and in 142 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 5 of 17 particular the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans so that ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking stall lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 18 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for all parking stalls or as approved by the City Engineer. One van accessible handicapped parking stall is required per 6 handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking stalls shall be a minimum of 26 feet with access drive aisles to Public Streets a minimum of 30 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. A minimum of 20 feet on each side of approach drives shall be provided where divided by median islands and as approved by the City Engineer. 13. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Major Arterial Residential 5.5" a.c./6.5" c.a.b. 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. 143 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 6 of 17 or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 14. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 15. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. 16. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refers to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 17. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 18. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Design and Development Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Mass Grading Plan 1" = 100' Horizontal 144 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 7 of 17 B. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal D. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. E. On -Site Street Improvements/ Signing & Striping/ Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1"= 4' Vertical (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) F. On -Site Commercial Precise Grading 1" = 20' Horizontal (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. "On -Site Commercial Precise Grading" plan is required to be submitted for approval by the Building Official, Planning Manager and the City Engineer. "On -Site Commercial Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements including but not necessarily limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, parking lot improvements and ADA requirements. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants) and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 145 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 8 of 17 19. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the Public Works "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the City website (www.la-quinta.org). Please navigate to the Public Works home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 20. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of the mylars of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer. 21. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. r,RQnrNC, 22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 23. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 24. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a professional 146 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 9 of 17 registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls), and E. A WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California, and F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 25. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping, or stabilized with such other erosion control measures, as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 26. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition requirement. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be 147 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 10 of 17 depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first eighteen inches (18") behind the curb. 27. Building pad elevations on the precise grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the Site Development Permit Preliminary Grading Plans, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 28. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus five tenths of a foot (0.5') from the elevations shown on the Site Development Permit Preliminary Grading Plans, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Staff for a substantial conformance finding review. 29. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. 30. This development shall comply with LQMC Chapter 8.11 (Flood Hazard Regulations). If any portion of any proposed building lot in the development is or may be located within a flood hazard area as identified on the City's Flood Insurance Rate Maps, the development shall be graded to ensure that all floors and exterior fill (at the foundation) are above the level of the project (100-year) flood and building pads are compacted to 95% Proctor Density as required in Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Section 65.5(a) (6). Prior to issuance of building permits for lots which are so located, the applicant shall furnish elevation certifications, as required by FEMA, that the above conditions have been met. DRAINAGE 31. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for SDP 2016-0001 SilverRock. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 148 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 11 of 17 32. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1-hour, 3-hour, 6-hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total run off. 33. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 34. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. 35. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin or as approved by the City Engineer. 36. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 37. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 149 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 12 of 17 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ. A. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopments Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 38. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 39. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 40. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 41. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall complywith 150 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 13 of 17 trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 42. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have parking lot improvements and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 43. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 44. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots. 45. All new landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 46. The applicant shall submit final landscape plans for review, processing and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Design and Development Director approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Director determines extenuating circumstances exist which justify an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the appropriate City official, including the Design and Development Director. 151 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 14 of 17 Prior to final approval of the installation of landscaping, the Landscape Architect of record shall provide the Design and Development Department a letter stating he/she has personally inspected the installation and that it conforms with the final landscaping plans as approved by the City. If staff determines during final landscaping inspection that adjustments are required in order to meet the intent of the Planning Commission's approval, the Design and Development Director shall review and approve any such revisions to the landscape plan. 47. All trees shall consist of, at minimum, 36-inch box trees (i.e., a minimum 2.5 inch caliper measured three feet up from grade level after planting), 5-gallon shrubs, and groundcover. Double lodge poles (two-inch diameter) shall be used to brace and stake trees. 48. A minimum of 50% of plantings classified "Shrubs, Perennials and Annuals" shall be provided as 5-gallon plants. This requirement shall be implemented on each Final Landscaping Plan submitted for review and approval to the City. MAINTENANCE 49. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 50. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of all private on -site improvements, perimeter landscaping, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 51. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. 52. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 152 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 15 of 17 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT 53. All mitigation measures included in Environmental Assessment 2014-1003 shall apply to this project. 54. If Bighorn Sheep enter into the Project Site, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less. If determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If the Agency transfers or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the Agency shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. FIRE DEPARTMENT 55. Developer shall provide 20 foot Fire Department access to hotel guest rooms and spa buildings. Access shall comply with CFC Chapter 5 and Riverside County Code 787. 56. The Final Landscape Plan shall not include Texas Honey Mesquite (Prosopis Glandulosa) as a planting option for canopy or accent trees. Appeal Condition of Approval CC-1 A. City Council Authority. This condition to modify the original decision of the Planning Commission for Site Development Permit 2016-0005 is binding on the City pursuant to its police power and applicant pursuant to Section 9.200.120(D)(6) of the La Quinta Municipal Code and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption as part of the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision, Case No. Appeal 2016-0004 (Administrative Appeal). This condition is incorporated into the approval for Site Development Permit 2016-005 by this reference, and all other conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission for Site Development Permit 2016-0005 remain in full force and effect. B. Intent. The intent of this condition is to protect Peninsular Big Horn Sheep for the approximately 525 acres of property known as The SilverRock Resort pursuant to the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the Mitigation Monitoring Program included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum for the SilverRock Resort Specific Plan (SRR Mitigation Measures), that certain Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014, by 153 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 16 of 17 and between the SilverRock Development Company, LLC (Developer) and the City (the DA), and that certain Purchase, Sale, and Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014, by and between Developer and the City (the PSDA). C. Immediate Construction of Temporary Fencing. Within 15 days after the decision of the hearing of the Administrative Appeal, the City shall solicit bids for the construction of temporary fencing. Within 21 days after the award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, construction of the temporary fencing shall commence. The completion of construction for the temporary fencing shall be as soon as possible after commencing construction, not to exceed a period of 30 days for total construction. Prior to the issuance of any grading, demolition, construction, or building permit, the construction of the temporary fencing shall be completed. For purposes of this condition, "temporary fencing" or "temporary fence" means an 8-foot high fence between the SilverRock Resort development and hillside as identified in the SilverRock Resort Fence Location Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A" to this condition and incorporated by reference (Fencing Site Plan). The temporary fencing shall have gaps that should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less, and shall not contain gaps in which Big Horn Sheep can be entangled. If and/or when the City transfers or disposes of any of the SilverRock Resort property adjacent to the hillside to the applicant, the City shall reserve an easement, and the applicant shall grant an easement, sufficient for the construction and maintenance of the temporary fencing until such time as the permanent fencing or functional equivalent (as described below) is completed. The temporary fencing on City - owned property at SilverRock Resort shall be maintained by the City and on Developer - owned property shall be maintained by Developer until such time as the permanent fencing or functional equivalent is completed. D. Construction of Permanent Fencing or Functional Equivalent. Prior to the issuance of a "grand opening" of the SilverRock Resort as improved pursuant to the DA and PSDA, construction of the permanent fencing or functional equivalent shall be completed. For purposes of this condition, "permanent fencing or functional equivalent" or "permanent fence" means an 8-foot high fence or other barrier that prevents Big Horn Sheep from accessing SilverRock Resort, constructed of durable material or natural landscaping elements approved by the City and applicant in a location that, upon completion of construction, will be within 1-10 feet of the temporary fence line as identified on the Fencing Site Plan. The permanent fence shall have gaps that should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less, and shall not contain gaps in which Big Horn Sheep can be entangled. If and/or when the City transfers or disposes of any of the SilverRock Resort property adjacent to the hillside to the applicant, the City shall reserve an easement, and the applicant shall grant an easement, sufficient for access to and (if necessary, construction 154 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED APPEAL 2016-0004, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 SILVERROCK RESORT ADOPTED: October 28, 2016 Page 17 of 17 of and maintenance of) the permanent fence. The permanent fence on City -owned property at SilverRock Resort shall be maintained by the City and on Developer -owned property shall be maintained by Developer. For purposes of this condition, "grand opening" of the SilverRock Resort means the opening to the general public of the new resort improvements consisting of the Luxury Hotel, Lifestyle Hotel, Conference and Shared Service Facility, Resort Residential Village, and dwelling unit that are part of the Luxury Branded Residential Development, Lifestyle Branded Residential Development, Promenade Mixed -Use Development, or Resort Residential Village (all as those terms are defined in the PSDA). The anticipated date of the grand opening for reference purposes only is May 2019. E. Periodic Review for Environmental Impacts. After the completion of construction of the temporary fencing and until the completion of construction of the permanent fence, the City and applicant shall coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and/or Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (collectively, the other governmental agencies) to review the effectiveness of the temporary fencing or permanent fencing (or functional equivalent). If review of environmental impacts advocates for a relocation of the temporary fencing or permanent fencing (or functional equivalent) to protect Big Horn Sheep, that review and relocation may be considered and used by the City and/or the applicant if they are consistent with any and all approvals from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and/or Coachella Valley Conservation Commission. F. Enforcement. This "CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL 2016- 0004, SRR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 ("Appeal Condition") may be enforced by the Appellants Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity. Enforcement shall be limited to an action in Superior Court to compel performance. 155 156 Attachment A: SilverRock Temporary Chain Link Fence Tradition to CVWD Canal `'. � :Y �' tea• `�� .. ..,.. _ • 4 M �, M ,-I� �kd. - C h ty� �� . i �yy �pr�`+r. •: �' �' d 'y`7,. F+t3•� i.MN. '.{.'1 � �,�`'�t�y � '� '•:. ..� r 1, y . ry ^ r - 4 .., .a "" - - ✓ i rr x, >r h i7-. � �* '.�� I " K� x: ,�•� ,';. .r - . , v;t , 't .ttA i ,, . ... t '. v(. r,%.. !{,,. t�:.J. •..: M.-. .:. xP- . .. .. A, q.. .:7 ....- r, ,. r'. .L �,:,i� �S �t �f. - _ Y _ � - 't.,�{ Ali" p•• i , ., :.i... ..?."��Y 11<. '",y �,. 6- �h�'S ��.; v� {. � f �.. G _.',i�. r -,'. '�„% w yr . I i• \.f 4Aa i �, %. � f ':'ji }�� z }SI oil �, �" � •� y.: i�� j;t ''`4i •i_�t 'A». Y!':'1 L :tr'`; l k ):r� ' 'IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the R�,T source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. 0 632 1,265 Feet REPORT PRINTED ON... 11/22/2016 8:58:09 AM © Riverside County RCIT GIS l — — — —. —. Legend ❑ Display Parcels roadsanno highways HWY INTERCHANGE INTERSTATE OFFRAMP ONRAMP USHWY i-i counties cities hydrographylines waterbodies Lakes Rivers ATTACHMENT 1 Project Information CASE NUMBER: SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 APPLICANT: SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LLC PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF LA QUINTA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: BURTON LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE STUDIO ARCHITECT: GENSLER REQUEST: ADOPT A RESOLUTION APPROVING SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005, INCLUDING THE SITE PLAN, ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN AND LANDSCAPING FOR PLANNING AREAS 2, 3 AND 4 OF THE SILVERROCK SPECIFIC PLAN. LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND AVENUE 52 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: TOURIST COMMERCIAL, OPEN SPACE - RECREATION ZONING DESIGNATION: TOURIST COMMERCIAL, GOLF COURSE SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: GOLF COURSE (WITHIN THE SILVERROCK PROJECT) SOUTH: GOLF COURSE (WITHIN THE SILVERROCK PROJECT) WEST: OPEN SPACE (SANTA ROSA MOUTAINS) EAST: GOLF COURSE (WITHIN THE SILVERROCK PROJECT) 158 ATTACHMENT 2 Attachment 2 Project Area Site Map SDP2016-0005 159 160 ATTACHMENT 3 SilverRock Development Company, LLC SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 PA-2. 3 & 4 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 10-18-2016 55.7598.000 SilverRock Development Company, LLC DEVELOPER 3551 Fortuna Ranch Road Encinitas, CA 92024 Telephone: 760.634.6543 Gensler ARCHITECT 225 Broadway Suite 1600 San Diego, CA 92101 Telephone: 619.557.2500 Michael Baker International CIVIL ENGINEER 75-410 Gerald Ford Drive Suite 100 Palm Desert, CA 92211 Telephone: 760.346.7481 Burton Landscape Architecture Studio LANDSCAPE 307 S. Cedros Ave. Solana Beach, CA 92075 Telephone: 858.794.7204 Glumac LIGHTING ENGINEER 18200 Von Karman Ave. Suite 100 Irvine, CA 92612-1029 Telephone: 949.833.8190 Melia Homes RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECT 8951 Research Drive Irvine, CA 92618 Telephone: 949.759.4367 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 161 VICINITY MAP '.-a�•' � JaMgrar liar - - -- � I A+uMunQf • I I ,• � �� - . SilverR+ack Specific " Plan Area F_ - - L SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES 79-179 AHMANSON LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT CODES AND REGULATIONS 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS ADMINISTRATIVE CODE PART 1, TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE PART 2, TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) (2009 ISO AND 2010 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2013 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE PART 3, TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) 2008 NEC AND 2610 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) ) 2013 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE PART 4, TITLE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) (2009 UMC AND 2010 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2013 CALFORNIA PLUMBING CODE PART 5, TIRE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) (2009 UPC AND 2010 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) 2013 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE PART 9, TIRE 24, CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS (CCR) (20091FC AND 2010 CALIFORNIA AMENDMENTS) NFPA 101 (LIFE SAFETY CODE), 2013 EDITION NFPA 72 (NATIONAL FIRE ALARM AND SIGNALING CODE), 2013 EDITION PARKING CALCULATIONS 20:731C10I. Rl00ilga10ATNIl99g1-\J IavlasmIT, IORI LAND USE REQUIRED PROVIDED NOTES HOTEL UNITS 268 269 SP REQUIREMENTS: 1/KEY FIRST 50 ROOMS. 7&KEY OVER 50 ROOMS. 340 KEYS. HOTEL F& B 97 97 V5 SEATS. 205 SEATS LUXURY HOTEL. 278 SEATS LIFESTYLE HOTEL. HOTEL EMPLOYEE 189 PARKING - CONFERENCE CENTER 350 SHAREDSERVICES PA 3 PA 2 �PA 4 94,000 SF 255,000 SF 189,000 SF IMPERMEABLE IMPERMEABLE IMPERMEABLE SURFACE SURFACE SURFACE\ \ SILVERROCK WAY_ a oocto5o9 � ' atootoa �d'o oa A 7 HARDSCAPE VS PERMEABLE SURFACE SCALE: 1"=400'-0" GOLFCOURSE 90 FUTURE GOLF 45 PRACTICE RANGE 20 TOTAL MASTERPLAN 1,059 DEVELOPMENT ADA PARKING SPACES 21 IN TOTAL PROJECT DATA 189 5 SPACES PER 378 MAX DAILY SHIFT EMPLOYEES. 351 CREDIT 30 SF/GUEST UNIT. THEREAFTER 1 SPACE PER 30 SF OF MTG AREA. 20,473 SF MTG AREA. 90 SP REQUIREMENT-18 HOLES:5 STALL3IHOLE 45 SP REQUIREMENT HOLES'.5 STALLSIHOLE. 20 IIPRACTICE RANGE TEE, 1,061 21 21 SPACES INCLUDED (4 OF WHICH ARE VAN) MASTERPLAN PARKING CALCULATIONS (ABOVE); 1 FOR EACH 100, OR FRACTION THEREOF, OVER 1000. PROJECT DATA CONTINUED BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE 11-LUXURY HOTEL. AND PERCENT OF SITE AREA: HS - HOTEL SPA: GR- GUESTROOMS: 140 ROOMS GR1: GR2: GR3: GR4: GR- GUESTROOMS(TOTAL)c PARKINGIIMPERMEABLE AREA: LANDSCAPEAREA: MC - MEETING CENTER: CC- CONFERENCE CENTER: SS- SHARED SERVICES: PARKINGIIMPERMEABLE AREA: LANDSCAPEAREA R1 -29 LUXURY RESIDENCES PARKINGIIMPERMEABLE AREA. LANDSCAPEAREA: 23,960 SFN.55 AC 2.35%OF PA2SITE 13,083 SFN.30 AC 1,27%OF PA2 SITE 76,444 SF/1.75 AC 742 742%OFPA2SITE 7,065 SR0 069%OFPA2SITE FPo6A 0.35%OFPA2SITE355SF5522 ,AC 0.54%OF PA SITE 92,589 SF/2.13 AC 8.99%OF PA2 SITE 255,000 SF/5.65AC 24.76%OF PA 2 SITE 644,983 SF/14.81 AC 62.63%OF PA 2 SITE 7,279 SFICA 7 AC 1.85%OF PA4 SITE 34,738 SFro80 AC 8.81%OF PA4 SITE 21,973 SF/0.50 AC 5.57%OF PA4 SITE 189,000 SF/4.33 AC 47,93%OF PA4 SITE 141,312 SF/3.25 AC 35.84%OF PA4 SITE 151,621 SF/3.48 AC 25.10%OF PA SITE 9000 SFY2.16 AC 15.56%OF PA SITE 358,540 SF18.23 AC 59.34%OF PA 3 SITE MAX BUILDING HEIGHT H1-HOTEL LOBBY 18'-0'-21'-6", SINGLE STORY RANGES': HI -HOTEL POOL BAR 11'-0'-14'-0", SINGLE STORY HS - HOTEL SPA 16'-3'-19'-3", SINGLE STORY 0 1 12'4--15'4", SINGLE STORY GR3 12'4'-15'4-, SINGLE STORY GR4 14'-10', SINGLE STORY CC CONFERENCE CENTER 28'-0'-31'-0", SINGLE STORY MC MEETING CENTER 15'LY 186", SINGLE STORY SS SHARED SERVICES 18'-0- 21 )", SINGLE STORY RESIDENTIAL PLAN I 16'-Y 19-5", SINGLE STORY RESIDENTIAL PLAN 2 17'-9--20'-9", SINGLE STORY RESIDENTIAL PLAN 3 17'-9'-20'-9", SINGLE STORY RESIDENTIAL PLAN 4 16'-8--19'-8", SINGLE STORY TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: HOTEL: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED SPA: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED GUESTROOMS: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED MEETING CENTER: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED CONFERENCE CENTER: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED SHARED SERVICES BUILDING: TYPE V-B, FULLY SPRINKLERED ' MAXIMUM HEIGHT RANGE PROVIDED TO ACCOUNT FOR POTENTIAL ADDITIONAL EQUIPMENT ENCLOSURE OCCUPANCY: PA2- RAA-2, B, S1, S-2 PA 3-Ra PA4- A-2, B, S1, S2 PROPOSED LAND USE: PA2- HOTEL WITH SUPPORTING SPAAND RESTAURANT PA-3-SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOMES PA4- CONFERENCE CENTER AND HOTEL SUPPORT SVCS SETBACKS: MINIMUM PERIMETER BUILDING/LANDSCAPE SETBACKS PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE, CT DISTRICT' BLDG. LS FROM PERIMETER STREET RIGHT OF WAY: 20' 10, FROM RESIDENTIAL, PR, OS AND GC DISTRICTS: 1. 15' 'SPECIFIC PLAN APPROVAL REQUIRED FOR DEVELOPMENTOR LAND DIVISION GREATER THAN 10ACRES IN THE CR, CP, AND CTDISTRICTS PER 9.90.040 BUILDING/LANDSCAPE SETBACKS PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN BLDG. LS PA-2 FROM PERIMETER STREET RIGHT OF WAY. 10, 10, FROM INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES WITHIN SAME PROPERTY: 0 0' PA-3 FROM PERIMETER STREET RIGHTOFWAY. 10, 10, GARAGFJCARPOFIT FROM STREET CURB: 5' PROJECT DESCRIPTION: THE PROJECT CONSISTS OF THE EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE RESTAURANT A NEW 140 KEY LUXURY HOTEL, HOTEL SPA AND FITNESS BUILDING, MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, FROM INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES WITHIN SAME PROPERTY: 0' 0' SHARED SERVICES BUILDING, LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENCES, PARKING AND RELATED SITE LEGAL DESCRIPTION; PA2: THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 1, 18, 20, 22, T AND'K OF PARCEL MAP 33367, AS SHOWN ON A IMPROVEMENTS ABUTTING MAI PA4 FROM PERIMETER STREET RIGHT OF WAY: 10' RESIDENTIAL, OS, AND GC DISTRICTS: 10' 0' GARAGFJCARPORT FROM STREET CURB: 5' FROM INTERIOR PROPERTY LINES WITHIN SAME PROPERTY: 0 10, 0' THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 224 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 24 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LOCATED WITHIN SECTIONS 5 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNADINO MERIDIAN PAS: THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 1,14,19 ANDW OF PARCEL MAP 33367, AS SHOWN ON A MAP SHEETINDEX THEREOF FILED IN BOOK 224 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 24 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LOCATED WITHIN SECTIONS 5,6, AND 8, TOWNSHIP G-0.0 PROJECT COVER SHEET SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNADINO MERIDIAN G-0.1 ARCHITECTURAL TITLE SHEET AND INDEX PA4: THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 1,16 AND T OF PARCEL MAP 33367, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREO FILED IN BOOK 224 OF PARCEL MAPS, AT PAGES 24 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE, IN THE OFFICE OF THE CIVIL COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LOCATED WITHIN SECTIONS 5 AND 8, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNADINO MERIDIAN C-1 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN APN: 776-150022,777490-011,770-200026,776-150-021, 776-150-023, 777490007, C-2 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 777490-001, 777490-012, 7T7490-014, 777490-018 C-3 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: TOURIST COMMERCIAL C-4 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN OPEN SPACE -RECREATION OPEN SPACE -NATURAL LANDSCAPE SILVERROCK SPECIFIC PLAN DESIGNATION: LAN GAR 2: CIVIC AND CULTURAL EVENTS FACILITIES PLANNING AREA 3: BOUTIQUE HOTEL L-0.1 PLANTING NOTES AND LEGEND PLANNING AREA 4'. RESORT HOTEL AND RESORT CASITAS L-0.2 ILLUSTRATIVE OVERALL SITE PLAN ZONING: L-0.3 ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN - LUXURY HOTEL, SPA & SHARED SERVICES GC -GOLF COURSE LP-3.0 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT INDEX CT-TOURISTCOMMERCIAL LP-3.1 PRELIM INARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTTYPICAL GUESTROOMDETAIL SITE AREAGROSS: FP - FLOODPLAIN : LP-3.2 PRELIMI NARY LANDSCAPE EN LARGEMENT TYPICAL GU ESTROOM DETAIL PA2- 1,029,675 SF 23.6 AC LP-3.3 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT TYPICAL ENTRY DETAIL PA3- 604161 SF 13.9AD LP-3.4 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT TYPICAL MODEL HOME DETAIL PA4- 394:307 SF NET: 9.1 AC LP-3.5 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT TYPICAL STREETSCAPE DETAIL PA2- 927,312SF 21.3AC L-2,1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT HOTEL POOL PA3- 492,798 SF 11.3 AC L-2.2 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT HOTEL SPA PA4- 368,996SF 8.5AC L-2.3 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT HOTEL ENTRY ROAD L-2.4 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT RESIDENTIAL ENTRY L-2.5 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT TYPICAL RESIDENTIAL LANDSCAPE L-2.6 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT SILVER ROCK WAY ENTRY L-2.7 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT SHARED SERVICES SHEET INDEX CONTINUED L-2.8 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT SHARED SERVICED BUILDING L-2.9 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENT TYPICAL GUESTROOM LANDSCAPE SP - L-1.1 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SP - L-1.2 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SP - L-1.3 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN Sp- L-1.4 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN SP - L-1.5 PRELIMINARY LANDSCAPE SITE PLAN LIGHTING E0.0 ELECTRICAL LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS AND SHEET INDEX EO.1 LIGHTING FIXTURE SCHEDULE E1.0 OVERALL SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.1 MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, SHARED SERVICES BUILDING SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.2 HOTEL AND SPA SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.3 GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PLAN E1.4 MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, SHARED SERVICES BUILDING SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC E1.5 HOTEL AND SPA SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC E1.6 GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC ARCHITECTURAL A-1.0 OVERALL ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN A-1.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA A A-1.2 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN -AREAS A-1.3 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA C A- .4 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA D A-1.5 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA E A-2.0 BUILDING RENDERINGS A-2.1 BUILDING RENDERINGS A-2.2 BUILDING RENDERINGS A-2.3 BUILDING RENDERINGS A-3.0 MATERIALS BOARD H1 -A-1.0 HOTEL BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 111- A-1.2 HOTEL POOL BAR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS H1 - A-2.0 HOTEL OVERALL ROOF PLAN H1 -A-3.0 HOTEL OVERALL FLOOR PLAN GR 1 - A-1.0 GR 1 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS GR 1 - A-2.0 FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN GR 2 - A-1.0 GR 2 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN GR 3 - A-1.0 GR 3 - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN GR4-A-1.0 GR4- EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS GR 4 - A-2.0 FLOOR PLAN, ROOF PLAN HS-A-1.0 HOTEL SPA BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS HS-A-2.0 HOTEL SPA OVERALL ROOF PLAN HS-A-3.O HOTEL SPA OVERALL FLOOR PLAN OCC - A-1.0 OVERALL CONFERENCE & SHARED SERVICES ROOF PLAN OCC - A-2.0 OVERALL CONFERENCE & SHARED SERVICES FLOOR PLAN MC-A-1.0 MEETING CENTER BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS MC-A-2.0 MEETING CENTER OVERALL ROOF PLAN MC-A-3.0 MEETING CENTER OVERALL FLOOR PLAN CC-A-1.0 CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS CC-A-2.0 CONFERENCE CENTER OVERALL ROOF PLAN CC-A-3.0 CONFERENCE CENTER OVERALL FLOOR PLAN SS-A-1.0 SHARED SERVICES BUILDING EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SS -A-2.0 SHARED SERVICES OVERALL ROOF PLAN SS -A-3.0 SHARED SERVICES OVERALL FLOOR PLAN LUXURY RESIDENTIAL ARCHITECTURAL R1 -1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN R1- 2 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN R1 - 3 PLAN NO, 1 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'A' R1-4 PLAN NO.1 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS' R1 -5 PLAN NO.1 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLANS R1- 6 PLAN NO.1 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLANS R1 -7 PLAN NO.2 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'A' R1 - 8 PLAN NO.2 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'B' R1-9 PLAN NO. 2 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLANS R1-10 PLAN NO, 2 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLANS R1-11 PLAN NO.3 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'A' R1 -12 PLAN NO.3 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'B' R1-13 PLAN NO.3 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLANS R1 -14 PLAN NO.3 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLANS R1 -15 PLAN NO.4 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATION'A' R1-16 PLAN NO.4 CONCEPTUAL ELEVATIONS' R1 -17 PLAN NO, 4 CONCEPTUAL ROOF PLANS R1-18 PLAN NO, 4 CONCEPTUAL FLOOR PLANS SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 FaX 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�0 ARcy 44A��.t.ES K N,. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 913°y^?P 9TF OP CAITfO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project NuI 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL TITLE SHEET & INDEX Scale NOT TO SCALE G - 0.1 162 482015 Gensler NOTE: PLANTING AREAS ARE SHOWN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. ' �F C 1 � F J 26 27 Z� \ ' c 1 , } 57.5 36.> T F� 30.0 43 TPM P/L 25 ``\ F �`.�4 58.0 0PUE 10 \ ' Toy �� \ of E�C) F 49 � A` A 1 _ 24 �� ` 57.5 ° 36C 22 v v 35.5 6 A V A ro 21 55.0 \ \ \ \ \ 20 ��TPM P/L \ \ \ 34.5 `� vx PUE \ �\ 54.0 Ca- 28L, a \ i0 PUE ROADBED WIDTH/ ROADBED WIDTH/ lb \ \\ CURB FACE CURB FACE \�� 55.5 \ Y \ 10, B' 13:5' 13.5' 6 10' 17 k" TYPE "C" �Q� TYPE "C" p `' PAD ELEV PAD ELEV CURB pQQP CURB ,�pQ �, Rj \ SLOPE VARIES �% 2ro $LOPE VARIES N\ 55.0 \ -MASS GRADE STREET UNDER UT TYPICAL INTERIOR STREET' \ \\\ \ 26' R/W TYPICAL 5ECT70N 50A - NOT TO SCALE i 16 [ \ NOTE: NO ON STREET PARKING l �J�I 33.0 �\ \ ( i \ LEGEND 10 PUE 1 CUT/FILL LINE PROPOSED CONTOUR —99 EXISTING CONTOUR SLOPE VARIES, MAX. z I---�__--TOE �Z�`Y 33.5 \\ \ EXISTING PROPERTY LINE TPM FL PARCEL LINE FROM TENTATIVE \ \ PARCEL MAP \ ` 14 h 9kX 18' TTlyp. P.A. 3 EODMATED o PUE EARTHWORK QUANTITY 54•5 (RAW EARTHWORK) L. CUT = 32,400 CY35.0 FILL=10,600 CY NO T F O R L� 0 N S T R U l� T I O �I TPM P/L VFOR, 0O LIABLE CHANGES rT OUSESRIZE THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS W/LL NOT N RESPONSIBLE \`Y` 12 \ y1\ L 38.0 `\\` FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANCES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS, ALL CHANGES TO THE PLANS MUST RE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED SY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS. Y 3 IMPORTANT NOTICE: NOTE' APPROVAL BY: CITY OF LA BIIINTA IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE. BENCHMARK: BASIS OF BEARINGS: STATE OF CALIFORNIA s H E E T CALL BEFORE YOU DIG AU UNDEhGR0UN0 tAnLINES � SabR/ 4216 LU THE OVINNENT CLUE LOCATIONS ARE PER REC0R0 DESCRIPTION. THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON Qgp{ESs70Nq "'U AN """ CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 1 OR"'Y"S' NUNISB SE PLANS THE CONTRACTOR KPD-f03-3-7D ED. 1 1/4' O.O.I, P. FILLED THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, T65, R7E, Q a" Sir �c Issuro SEraIS A FERM1 SHALL 9S£ OU£ CAUTA7N IN N/ CONC. IN 5' O.D. CONC. COLLAR ON. SBM, AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO.28470-1, s INTERNATIONAL DAB SILVERROCK RESORT TO 11.VA11 WttL Bf YALA. ALL E....AIION, ANO NOTE lIMO1HY R. JONASSON. BE 0.6', 330 NORTH OF C.L. INT. OF WASHINGTON ME 263/76-90, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE No. 57667 Puauc WORK DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER Rae rout aec-awvATroN io WHfREALL UTLDTYLINES 75410 Gera la Ford Drive, Suite f00, Palm Desert, CA P.A. 3 (WEST HALE NUDeEx PILL STREET & 52NO AVENUE & 6.2 SOUTH OF COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING Exp. 12-31-201 ]a www. mha ker intl.rom OF 4 SHEETS UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT ART L0CA7E0 �R RfLOCATFD PPY 98927D 0. 760-345-7481 is 750-345-8315 R.C.E. NO. A58 EXP. 12-31-16 FOR ODRONTA7ONONOFME ON PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DRAWN DESIGNED JOB NUMBER BEING A PORTION THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF TOLL FREE I-800-227-2600 FlNAL DRAWINGS OF RfCORO. DATE BY DE5CRIPTON APFD DATE TWO WORKING OAKS DATE: TWO R, TOWNSHIP fi SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST 5.8. 8.& M. BEFORE YOU DIG ELEV. = 40. 110 R E V I S 1 0 N S MICHAEL S. SUTTON R.C.E. 57667 SCALE AS SHOWN CHECKED 'ISE DALE MAY 16. 2016 FOR: CITY OF LA QUINTS, PAOJECi N0. 152669 Q- 2IL a 2F 13.5' 13.5' sTYPE LROADBEOWrOTHI "C" TYPE "C" PAD ELEVCURB �% ( CURB 2$ Wm 1 y "W—MASS GRADE STREET UNDERCUT TYPICAL INTERIOR 57-REET 28' RM/ TYPICAL SECRON NOT TO SCALE NOTE: NO ON STREET PARKING P.A. 3 E57IMATE0 EARTHWORK QUANTITY (RAW EARTHWORK) CUT = 32,400 CY FILL = 10,000 CY NOTE: PLANTING AREA5 ARE SHOWN ON LAN05CAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN5. 1755.0 \, \ _-------___ ----__------_—__ ----------- — — — — — — 15 33.5 , , g T X .sterns A TPM /L 9• iv Typ. \ PAO ELEV `YT 14 10 SUE \ \\ \ \ \ O ` 34.5 13 � TPM P/L �` T 35.0 � \ TPM P/L 12 38.0 . \�� \ ® O o T 10' PUZ910 T 30D ` s x1&Typ. \ 39.0 ' C ---- PUE Fs F� = / c It 10 PUE 36.5 c F 37.5 58.0 A A GY 7 F iI a TPM P/L 3�TY A 8 57-3 c,---- � \ 57.0 I i ----- -. �LIMRS OF GRADING, i LEGEND CUT/FILL LINE -- —C-- F PROPOSED CONTOUR —99 - EXISTING CONTOUR SLOPE VARIES, TOP MAX. 2.*1 ---- --- —TOE TPM P/L _ P/L EXISTING 11��//�` N PROPERTY LINE �n I V tJ T F O R - TPM PL PARCEL LINE FROM TENTATIVE - � '� T �`� I� J1H71/ XffP1Ati �iiAN t &USES H F""NEER ERFPARW,, THE I : aiEL 07 eE PESPays1REE PARCEL MAP \ I U �,� GR, �n �Y'BLE FOA ��NAJTH�R�ZFO CHANGES TO OR L E, aF YH r AL CHAN:;E TO THE ` l� VVV L! I L I J SE lf/ WkiT''A AND MJST NE RPPFCiI"C SY W,E PRE 4 IW-s PANS. IMPORTANT NOTICE. NOTE' BENCHMARK: BASIS OF BEARINGS: APPROVAL BY: CITY OF LA BIIINTA IN THE CITY DO LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA S H E E T CALL BEFORE YOU DIG sarxry 4216 cF THE OVERNNENT E E AU UNofEANoVNDUH[InZS Iq' ESELONq REaInN,Np,Rr ' mcNnrrraTrox Nuwere ec LOCATIONS ARE PER NECORO PIANS THE CONTR4CTON DESCRIPTION. KPD-f03-3-7D FO. 1 1/4' O. D.I, P. FILLED THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, T65, RUE, Q a" Sir �c CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN 2 rssuro eEraaEn vE,roa [ X/ COIJC, IN 5' O.D. CONE. COLLAR ON. SBM, AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP N0.28470-1, �1 I N T E R N A T I O N A L °A SILVERROCK RESORT TOCX."P41 wal eE vu,o. rae rant vec-awvaTroN io 41 EXCAVATION, AND NOTE WHfRE A(/UTILITY LINES 0.6'.330 NORTH OF C.L. INT. OF WASHINGTON NE 263/76-90, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE ND. 57667 1aI 75410 Gera ltl Foro Drive, Suite f00, Palm Desert, CA lIMO1HY R. JONASSON. PE POBUC WOWS DIRECTOR/CITY ENgNEER 4 uu,eEx au. ART LOCATED DR RELOCATED STREET & 52N0 AVENUE G 6.2' SOUTH OF COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING Eq 12-31-201 ww1,.v%,Printl.rom P.A. 3 (EAST HALF) GF SHEETS UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT FOROOCUNENTATIONONON PPY 9B927D p. 760-346-7481 is 750-346-3375 R.C.E. NO. 45843 EXP. 12-31-16 TOLL FREE fINAt DRAWINGS OF NfCORO. BY PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DRAWN DESIGNED JOB NUMBER BEING A PORTION THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF WORKING 7W0 WORKING DAYS DA KSD DATE DE5CRIPOOIN APP'D DATE DATE: SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP fi SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST S.B.B.& M. BEFORE YOU DIG ELEV. = 40. 110 R E V I S 1 0 N S MICHAEL S. SUTTON R.C.E. 57667 SCALE AS SHOWN CHECKED NSE DATE MAY 16. 2016 FOR: CITY OF LA OUINTA PRDJECi NO 152659 O Z J m CL C 10 N 16 NOTE: PLANTING AREAS ARE SHOWN ON �\ 9 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. LEGEND l_ \\\ ` P.A. 2 NORTH ESTIMATED PROPOSED LINE E - PROPOSED CONTOUR —e9 — _ - \ \ EARTHWORK QUANTITY P.A. 4 ESTIMATED EXISTING CONTOUR \\ \ \ EARTHWORK QUANTITY MA SLOPE VARIES, , r_TOE X. 11 y Y Y TOE (RAW EARTHWORK) PROPERTY LINE -- i ` CUT = 21,700 CY RAW EARTHWORK 18.5 ' 3 rROADII.Ell .5' \ \ \ A ^ ( ) TPM PL PARCEL LINE FROM TENTATIVE ROADBED WIDTH/ '3 WIDTH/ \ \ \ \ \ FILL=14,400 CY CUT = 5,300 CY PARCEL MAP zH CURB FACE 6" 15' 15 ' 6RB FACE. FILL = 77,200 CY w \\ \\\ 13. 9' 13.9' F i I \ \ \ TYPE "C"o.01 cuaez% �21 21 >10 'MASS GRADE STREET UNDER UT \ Q --a_ — ---- TYPE „C„ 51LVERROCK WAY CURB 31, R/W Hill NOT TO SCALE U NOTE: NO ON STREET PARKING \ TPM i 10 TPM P/L 55.0 \10PUE39.0iyG \ `� Pk,3 Etmdle ev Typ. C \ / I , S \ TPM P/L 36.5 -- osx \� /yam Fri 10 PUE e 365.5 7 Q, TPM P/L Y 8 37.3� C 37.0 --- ZL- -- - o LIMR5 OF GRADING VA - _ __ v �v CON " T UC T� 0�l II UNAUTHORIZED L{l OS�J'—TLlE ENCINEE PREP IIESf PLANS WILL NOT B tSPLNSIBLE FOR, OR LLARLE FOR, UNAU _ L'sE.i OF THESE PLANS. ALL CHANCES ri THE- \ 1 f PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS \ IMPORTANT NOTICE. NOIL' APPROVAL BY: CITY OF LA BIIINTA IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, S H E E T BENCHMARK: BASIS OF BEARINGS: STATE of CALIFORNIA CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ALL UIJDEAGROUND UII[IIIES � SWc 4216 r wWRnrErw cent LOCAR96 ARE PER RECORD DESCRIPTION'. THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON Qp,OF fS8910 � �. . RIB � AR IND A 6 CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN nBnmrATrod xuNem ec �C THE CON724C7OR KPo-fO3-3-7D ED. 1 1/4' O.O.I, P. FILLED THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, T65, R7E, Q pE SST rc bsuEo aEroaE A FEftYII SHALL USf DDE CAU/AAV IN W/ CONC. IN 5' O.O. CONC. COLLAR ON. GEM, AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO.28470-1, INTERNATIONAL DALE SILVERROCK RESORT ID EXGVATE WllL BE uatA. ALL fXGi,AlION, AIJO NOTE 0.6', 330 NORTH OF C.L. INT. DF WASHINGTON TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PE Fae roue paE-IXfAVAl-N1 ggLOgE ALL 0.... LINES ME 263/76-90, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE No. 57667 75410 Gereltl FOrS Dr1ve, Suite 100, Palm Desert, CA Puauc wofms DIRECTOR/CI1Y ENGINEER M1nNEtR ptt STREET & 52NO AVENUE & 6.2' SOUTH OF COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING Exp. 12-31-201 www. mha ker int Lrom P.A. 2 (Portion) & P.A. 4 OF 4 SHEETS UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERTLOCA" OR RELOCATED RRy 989279 O'. 750-345-7481 f: 750-345-8315 R.C.E. NO. 45843 EXP. 12-31-16 FOR BD*WIN6TA7IONONON PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DRAWN DESIGNED JOB NUMBER BEING A PORTION THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF TOLL FREE I-800-2 DAYS HAWL DRAWINGS' Of RECORD. DATE BY DE5CRIPTION APP'D DATE SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST S.R.R. & M. TWO WORKING DAYS DATE: SCALE CHECKED DATE TOP: PROJECT ND. 152D5J BEFORE YOU DIG ELEV. = 40. 110 R E V I S I G N S MICHAEL S. SUTTON R.O.E. 57667 as snOwN wss MAY 16, 2016 CITY OF LA C U I N T A I \\ — " NOTE: PLANTING AREAS ARE SHOWN ON \ TPM P/L �i \; LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. It / _ _ TPM P/L �; I\ Tod ,gym F \ O C� P.A. 2 50U7-H E57-IMATEO .. u EARTHWORK QUANTITY (RAW EARTHWORK) CUT=14,000 CY F \ \\ \, FILL = 59,100 CY To /I 24.5 it O '''� � \� 25.0• n '---__ .� , s' `v a/ �` o . .JOIN TPM FA - TH -CACOLFRTPA TPM P/L— �F _ Q. TPM PL FLEI \\ \\ �� 23.0 s `�.,,` - - �-', , ,� �_ '_py ' ---_,�-, W.5.15='' c JOINF105T1NG Y� 823.0 CT ,\ ,---� ,J`. r- ((' F l GOLF CART PATH c % `. Syr 125.0' 23.1 c, LEGEND , CUT/FILL LINE -- - F— � _ � � - _- ---- � o_ � I 24.� i PROPOSED CONTOUR —se — -y.-_ C'IF EXISTING CONTOUR --- -- --- l �(�\ o —TPM P/L \\�� SLOPE VARIES, MAX. 21 _�L__�l__TOE sn\ 23.D --- ' EXISTING PROPERTY LINE \ i ..,., o TPM PL PARCEL LINE FROM TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP i�6 \ �%0j \ A �y4- �.\ 24:0 \ J01N EXISTING GOLF CART PATH F v 25.0 - - - / ,,NOT FOR _-, ---- I'JO/�IN UNAUTHORIZED CHANCES B' USES: THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNAUTHORIZED CHANCES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS ALL CHANGES TO THE CONS TRUC T ION EXISTING GOLF CART PATH PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS. IMPORTANT NOTICE: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG NOTL ALL BENCHMARK: BASIS OF BEARINGS: APPROVAL BY: CITY OF LA OUINTA IN THE CITY OF LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA S H E E T SZVm 4216 � AT saWRNUENL cent REWIRES AN MOUIRY - nEMIFlGDON xuNem eE W4 ` .UNDEAGROUNDUIILNLES LOCAIIOVS AYE PER RECORD %ANS THE CONT24C70R DESCRIPTION: RPo-103-3-70 ED. 1 1/4- O.O.I.P. FILLED THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, T6S, RTE, Qp,OF ESSLpy� Q`�� pE� 5 SO ! .Z. ;� CONCEPTUAL GRADING PLAN A bsuEo a FERYR SHALL USf DUE CAU/AAV IN W/ CONC. IN 1C 0. D. CONC. COLLAR ON. SEN. AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO.28470-1, s I N T E R N A T 1 O N A L °"'� SILVERROCK RESORT 4 ro 0` a'rz N BE uNm. F64 roue pRE-arnvarrory to xuueEx AI EXGNA ON, ANO NO E 09/£RE ALL UTILITY L/Nf5 0.6', 330 NORTH OF C.L. INT. STEELY & 52N0 AVENUE 6 6.2' OF WASHIN6TON SOUTH OF NE 263/76-90, RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING No. 57667 Exp. 12-31-201 75410 Gerald Ford Drive. Suite 100, Palm Desert, CA www. mha ker i nt 1. rom TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PE PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER P.A. 2 (Portion) OF 4 SHEETS UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERTARE LOCATED OR RELOCATED fORDOCULAENTATTOM7NON PP} 98927D a. 750-345-7481 f: 750-346-8315 R.C.E NO. 454143 UP. 12-31-16 TOLL FREE I-800-227-2600 FlAWL DRAWINGS OF RECORD. DATE BY DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DRAWN DESIGNED JOB NUMBER BEING A PORTION THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF SECTION B, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST S.8.B.6 M. TWO WORKING DAYS BEFORE YOU DIG ELEV. = 40.110 R E V I S 1 D N S DATE SCALE CHECJED DATE FORT CITY OF LA QUINTq PROJECT NO lezeee MICHAEL S. BUTTON R.D.E.57667 AS SHOWN MSs MAY 16.2016 7 rl 1 44 LEGEND 25 �_--' -` o_ CUT/FILL LINE — esa wv (J PROPOSED CONTOUR —89 2 EXISTING CONTOUR --- — �eN ` �e SLOPE VARIES, 22 c` x MAX. 2:1 EXISTING �\ 2Tl `� PROPERTY LINE aea1 �\ to x\ c TPM PL PARCEL LINE FROM TENTATIVE ` \ ZO. x PARCEL MAP 19 �� 17 15 m 14, 1 12 O rn 12 3 4 110 Wta trM NI W.a c , ,o - I ----- _- I - I I -- PHASE 1 DESIGN SLOPES I , tea; J 57o OR GREATER — 4 Oct asTxs \\xl J , _ L TM 1 /o Lg > O b4 O / I . i trNm Cam\ ''NOT I UNAUTHORIZED CHANGE 8' USES. THE ENGINEER PREPARING THESE PLANS WILL NOT BE RESPONSIBLE \ � O I \' � � � V I � o' \' FOR, OR LIABLE FOR, UNA UTHORIZEO CHANCES TO OR USES OF THESE PLANS ALL CHANGES TO THE V V PLANS MUST BE IN WRITING AND MUST BE APPROVED BY THE PREPARER OF THESE PLANS. IMPORTANT NOTICE. NOILAPPROVAL BY: CITY OF LA DUINTA IN THE CITY DO LA DUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, CALL BEFORE YOU DIG ALL UNOEAGROONp OII[NES BENCHMARK: BASIS OF BEARINGS: STATE OF CALIFORNIA S H E E T sECR,ry 4216 OT rxcaWRnAEr✓T CfllE LOCATKMS ARE PER RECORD DESCRIPTION: THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON Qp,OF ESSLpy� SLOPES 5% OR GREATER REWIRES AN INQUIRY %ANS THE CONT24C70R Q`�� pE� S' SO - ®BlRFlG1ION xuNem eE RPo-103-3-70 ED. 1 1/4' O.O.LP. FILLED THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 6, TfiS, R7E, .r � c bsuEo aEroRE A FERYII SHALL USf DUE CAN/pN IN W/ CONC. IN 5' O.O. CONC. COLLAR ON. SEN. AS SHOWN ON TRACT MAP NO.28470-1, s INTERNATIONAL DATE SILVERROCK RESORT IO EXGVATE WxL BE UNA. ALI fXG1,A,,,, ANO NOTE 0.6', 330 NORTH ff C.L. INT. OF WASHIN6TON � TIMOTHY R. JONASSON, PE F64 roue pRE-IXfAVAl-L0. µq�gE ALL OTIUTY ONES NE 263/76-90. RECORDS OF RIVERSIDE No. 57657 75410 Gerald Ford Drive. Suite Too, Palm Desert, CA PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/CITY ENGINEER xuueEN ptt STREET & 52NO AVENUE & 5.2 SOUTH OF COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, BEING Exp. 12-39-201 www. mha ker intl.rom P.A. 2 (Portion) & P.A. 4 OF I -.TT UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERro, LOGIEO OR RfLOCATEP pp} 989270 a. 760-346-7481 f: 760-346-8395 R.CE ND. L5841 UP. 12-51-18 TOLL FREE I-BUD-227-260 OML D p1jN6A7IONONON PREPARED UNDER THE DIRECT SUPERVISION OF: DRAWN DESI(NED JOB NUMBER BEING A PORTION THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTH HALF OF TWO WORKING DAYS FlAWL CRAWINCS OF RECORD. DATE BY DESCRIPTION APP'D DATE DATE SECTION B. TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST S.8.B.6 M. BEFORE YOU DIG ELEV. = 40.110 R E V I S 1 0 N S MICHAEL S. BUTTON R.O.E.57667 SCALE AS SHOWN CHID Nss DATE AUGUST W. z +FOR: CITY OF LA QUINTA PROJECT NO 15ze69 Plant Legend Canopy Trees Symbol Botanical name Vertical Accents Minimum Size Symbol Botanical name Parkinsonia x'Desert Museum' ++ Desert Museum Palo Verde 36" Box 0 Cereus hildmannianus++ Peru Apple Cactus Prosopis glandulosa Texas Honey Mesquite Ulmus parvifolia'True Green' Chinese Elm Accent Trees Symbol Botanical name Common Name Minimum Size Common Name Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow 15 Gal X Chitalpa tashkintensis Chitalpa Citrus species Citrus Lysiloma watsonii Desert Fern Ebenopsis ebano Texas Ebony Olneya tesota Desert Ironwood Sophora secundiflora Texas Mountain Laurel Thevetia nerifolia Yellow Oleander Vitex agnus-castus Chaste Tree Palms Symbol Botanical name Common Name Minimum Size Brahea armata Mexican Blue Fan Palm Varies 6-20' BTH Phoenix dactylifera Date Palm Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm Turf Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size Bermuda sod Dasylirion wheeleri ++ Desert Spoon Dodonaea viscosa'Purpuraea' Purple Hop Bush Fouquieria splendens++ Ocotillo Hesperoyucca whipplei ++ Foothill Yucca Thevetia nerifolia (peruviana) Yellow Oleander Yucca rostrata ++ Beaked Yucca Native / Naturalized Desert Zone Symbol Botanical name Common Name Enhanced Desert Landscape Plant material to supplement "Native / Naturalized Desert Zone" Common Name Minimum Size Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size 36" Box Size Agave americana ++ Century Plant 5 Gal Aloe striata ++ Coral Aloe 1 Gal Baccharis pilularis Dwarf Coyote Brush 1 Gal Baileya multiradiata Desert Marigold 1 Gal Caesalpinia pulcherrima Red Bird of Paradise 5 Gal Calliandra californica Baja Fairy Duster 1 Gal Dalea frutescens'Sierra Negra' Black Dalea 1 Gal Dalea greggii Trailing Indigo Bush 1 Gal Dyssodia acerosa Shrubby Dogwood 1 Gal Echinocactus grusonii ++ Golden Barrel Cactus 5 Gal Encelia ferinosa Brittlebush 1 Gal Ericameria laricifolia Turpentine Bush 1 Gal Ericameria nauseosa Rubber Rabbitbrush 1 Gal Festuca mairei Atlas Fescue 1 Gal Hesperoyucca whipplei ++ Foothill Yucca 1 Gal Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush 1 Gal Leucophyllum species Texas Ranger 5 Gal Muhlenbergia rigens Deer Grass 1 Gal Opuntia species ++ Prickly Pear 5 Gal Penstemon spectabilis Royal Beard Tongue 1 Gal Senna artemisiodes Feathery Cassia 1 Gal Stipa tenuissima Mexican Feather Grass 1 Gal Tecoma stans Yellow Bells 5 Gal Asparagus densiflorus'Sprengeri' Sprenger Asparagus 1 Gal Bougainvillea spp. Red Bougainvillea 5 Gal Bulbine frutescens ++ No Common Name 1 Gal Carissa macrocarpa'Tuttle' Natal Plum 5 Gal Euphorbia rigida ++ Yellow Spurge 1 Gal Eremophila maculata'Valentine' Spotted Emu Bush 1 Gal Feijoa sellowiana Pineapple Guava 5 Gal Ficus microcarpa nitida Indian Laurel Fig 15 Gal Justicia spicigera Mexican Honeysuckle 1 Gal Lantana species No Common Name 1 Gal Ligustrum japonicum'Texanum' WaxLeafPrivet 5 Gal Myrtus communis Myrtle 1 Gal Pedilanthus macrocarpus Slipper Plant 5 Gal Penstemon eatonii Firecracker Penstemon 1 Gal Portulacaria afra ++ Elephant'sFood 1Gal Prunus caroliniana Carolina Laurel Cherry 15 Gal Punica granatum Flowering Pomegranate 5 Gal Rhus lancea African Sumac 15 Gal Rosmarinus officinalis species Rosemary 1 Gal Ruellia brittoniana Mexican Petunia 1 Gal Salvia greggii Autumn Sage 1 Gal Santolina chamaecyparissus Lavender Cotton 1 Gal Sophora secundiflora Texas Mountain Laurel 1 Gal Tecoma capensis* Cape Honeysuckle 5 Gal Trachelospermum jasminoides Star Jasmine 1 Gal Westringia fruticosa Coast Rosemary 1 Gal Xylosma congestum Shiny Xylosma 5 Gal Vines Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size Bougainvillea spp. Red Bougainvillea 5 Gal Hardenbergia violacea False Sarsaparilla 5 Gal Macfadyena unguis-cati *** Cat's Claw 5 Gal Pyrostegia venusta Flame Vine 5 Gal Rosa banksiae Lady Banks' Rose 5 Gal SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2251 Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com p Date Description 08-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/ Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 5 7 Wm. 5. unon No.2135 y aL Project Name ep 31 SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Landscape Planting Notes & Legend Scale L-0.1 168 15 Gensler I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2258madway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Lend sce pe Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 e5a 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F _ bu non stud o.com L Date Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal N. 09.19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 I Seal/ Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. S. urton No.2135 y do Project Name a „� SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Deserlplion Illustrative Overall Site Plan Swill 11,= 150'-0" 0 75 150 300 L-0.2 169 2015 Gensler SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2258madway TO 6195572500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Ced... Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F —..b-,n stud o.com 1,LDate Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal N. 09.19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/ Signature C PpCNITEC,. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. S. urton No.2135 y Project Name a „� SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Illustrative Site Plan - Luxury Hotel, Spa & Shared Services Scale 1" = 80'-0" 17 0 20 40 So 160 L-0.3 170 3ensler KEY PLAN r — \ PA MC L PA \ CC SS AH \ — \PA4 H1 HS ; ` LP.7 I PA GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2256madway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 eye 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F _ bu rto_—dio.com Date Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/ Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. S. unon No. 3135 y o Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Index Swle 0 Os 10 20 LP-3.0 171 © 2015 Gensler Plant List Trees Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size OCereus peruvianus Peruvian Apple 36" box �-✓ Parkinsonia x'Desert Museum' No Common Name 36" box ► Prosopis glandulosa Honey Mesquite 36" box Vines Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size 0 Bougainvillea 'La Jolla' No Common Name 15 gal - Staked Shrubs, Perennials, and Annuals Symbol Spacing Botanical name Common Name Size AA 7' o.c. Agave americana ++ Century Plant 20 gal BL 36" D.C. Bougainvillea'La Jolla' La Jolla Bougainvillea 1 gal BO 30" o.c. Bulbine frutescens ++ No Common Name 1 gal Cp 7' D.C. Caesalpinia pulcherrima * Red Bird of Paradise 1 gal Ef 5' D.C. Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 1 gal Em 36" o.c. Eremophila maculata'Valentine' No Common Name 1 gal O36" O.0 Festuca mairei No Common Name 1 gal Hp 18" O.C. Hesperaloe parviflora ++ Red Yucca 1 gal Lt 8' D.C. Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush I gal Mr 4' D.C. Muhlenbergia rigens Deergrass 1 gal Op 36" o.c. Opuntia ficus-indica ++ Prickly Pear 1 gal Pe 24" D.C. Penstemon parryi Parry's Penstemon 1 gal Ro. 48" o.c. Rosmarinus officinalis'Prostratus' Rosemary 1 gal Rp 36" D.C. Ruellia peninsularis Desert Ruellia 1 gal Lm 48" D.C. Lantana montevidensis Trailing Lantana 1 gal KEY PLAN - PA MC L PA \ CC - SS AH \ �� \PA4 - * H1 HS ; �,LP3 PA2 GR v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com L Date Description OSi6-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 I Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 5 7 Wm. 5. unon No.2135 y Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Guestroom Landscape Detail Scale a os m zo LP-3.1 172 2015 Gensler HP HP HP HP HP Ad Ad Ad A �- 1 i R.+ 3f?3 . 'u;'�uifis. III lllll�ii� r t) Ws 13' 1.t VHP HP HP Ca Ca Ca Ca Ca HP HP Ca Ce H Of Of H HP Of P f Of 0 ryN�� Plant List Trees Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size OCereus peruvianus Peruvian Apple 36" box Cordia boissieri Texas Olive 24" box Fouquieria splendens Ocotillo 36" box Lysilomawatsonii Desert. Fern 15gal Parkinsonia x'Desert Museum' No Common Name 36" box ► Prosopis glandulosa Honey Mesquite 36" box Yucca rosrata Beaked Yucca 36" box Palms Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm 25' BTH Shrubs, Perennials, and Annuals Symbol Spacing Botanical name Common Name Size Ad 48" D.C. Agave desmettiana 'Variegata' ++ Variegated Smooth Agave 1 gal 36' o.c. Aloe'Blue Elf' No Common Name 1 gal I B I 30' D.C. Bulbine frutescens ++ No Common Name 1 gal cg 36' o.c. Carissa macrocarpa'Green Carpet' Natal Plum 1 gal Ca 30' D.C. Citrus aurantium Sour Orange 1 gal Df 5' D.C. Dalea frutescens 'Sierra Negra' Black Dalea 1 gal Hp 18" D.C. Hesperaloe parviflora ++ Red Yucca 1 gal SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 eye 7 94 7— T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com Date Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal N. 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature Rp 36" D.C. Ruellia peninsularis Desert Ruellia 1 gal C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. 5. urton No.2135 KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES Project Number ` —1— — SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Guestroom Landscape Detail AH PA 4 H1 PA 2 Swle HSLP3.2i; =10'0" 20 LP-3.2 GR 173 © 2015 Gensler n i > 4 L V AJ i HP i L �> HP HP HP HP HP HP HP I HP HP HP HP HP � I HP HP HP 1 Plant List Trees Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size Ebenopsis ebano Texas Ebony 36" box OParkinsonia x'Desert Museum' No Common Name 36" box ► Prosopis glandulosa Honey Mesquite 36" box Yucca rosrata Beaked Yucca 36' box Palms Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size • Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm 25' BTH Shrubs, Perennials, and Annuals Symbol Spacing Botanical name Common Name Size Ad 48" D.C. Agave desmettiana 'Variegata' ++ Variegated Smooth Agave 1 gal Ag 7' o.c. Agave guiengola ++ Creme Brulee Agave 20 gal BL 36" D.C. Bougainvillea'La Jolla' La Jolla Bougainvillea 1 gal B� 30" D.C. Bulbine frutescens ++ No Common Name 1 gal Ef 5' o.c. Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 1 gal Hp 18" D.C. Hesperaloe parviflora ++ Red Yucca 1 gal Lt 8' D.C. Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush 1 gal Mr 4' o.c. Muhlenbergia rigens Deergrass 1 gal Op 36" o.c. Opuntia ficus-indica ++ Prickly Pear 1 gal Rp 36" D.C. Ruellia peninsularis Desert Ruellia 1 gal Sc 72" D.C. Simondia chinensis Jojoba 15 gal KEY PLAN - PA MC L PA \ CC - SS AH` LP 3 4 PA H1 PA HS `i / ♦ �.0 •a # GR v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F —W.bu rton-studio.com L Date Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. 5. unon No.2135 y Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Entry Landscape Detail Style 0 Os 10 20 LP-3.3 174 15 Gensler Plant List Trees Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size OCereus peruvianus Peruvian Apple 36" box Chilopsis linearis Desert Willow 36" box Parkinsonia x'Desert Museum' No Common Name 36" box Yucca rosrata Beaked Yucca 36" box Vines Symbol Botanical name Common Name Size 01 Bougainvillea 'La Jolla' No Common Name 15 gal - Staked Shrubs, Perennials, and Annuals Symbol Spacing Botanical name Common Name Size Ag T o.c. Agave agave guiengola ++ Ov 18" D.C. Agave victoriae-reginae ++ BL 36" D.C. Bougainvillea 'La Jolla' OB 30" D.C. Bulbine frutescens ++ O30" D.C. Bulbine frutescens ++ Ca 30" D.C. Citrus aurantium Er 5' o.c. Euphorbia rigida ++ EO 5' o.c. Euphorbia resinifera Ly 36" D.C. Lantana x 'New Gold' Rp 36" D.C. Ruellia peninsularis Creme Brulee Agave Victoria Agave La Jolla Bougainvillea No Common Name No Common Name Sour Orange Yellow Spurge No Common Name No Common Name Desert Ruellia 20 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 15 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal 1 gal KEY PLAN - PA MC L PA \ CC - SS AH` LP3 4 \PA4 H1 PA2 HS GR v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com L Date DescHlitionDate Description OSi6-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/ Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 7 Wm. 5. urton No.2135 y Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Model Home Landscape Detail �Swle 0 Os 10 20 LP-3.4 175 2015 Gensler Plant List Trees Symbol Botanical name Dalbergia sissoo \-✓ Parkinsonia x'Desert Museum' ► Prosopis glandulosa Vines Symbol Botanical name Ql Bougainvillea 'La Jolla' Common Name Size Indian Rosewood 36' box No Common Name 36' box Honey Mesquite 36' box Common Name Size No Common Name 15 gal - Staked 0 Df f� Shrubs, Perennials, and Annuals Symbol Spacing Botanical name Common Name Size Ad 48' o.c. Agave desmettiana 'Variegata' ++ Variegated Smooth Agave 1 gal BO 30' o.c. Bulbine frutescens ++ No Common Name 1 gal Df 5' o.c. Dalea frutescens 'Sierra Negra' Black Dalea 1 gal Hp 18' D.C. Hesperaloe parviflora ++ Red Yucca 1 gal Ly 36' o.c. Lantana x'New Gold' No Common Name 1 gal Lg 5' D.C. Leucophyllum frutescens'Green Cloud' Green Cloud Texas Ranger 15 gal Mc 36' o.c. Myrtus communis Myrtle 15 gal KEY PLAN r — PA MC 1LP3.5 CC ` Eli l SS \ AH \ PA 4 �H1 HS► PA GR v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 a,a 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F _ bu rton-studio.com L Date Description 05-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 I Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 s 7 Wrn S. unon No.2135 y a`L Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Streetscape Landscape Detail Scale a os m zo LP-3.5 176 2015 Gensler S pa Sp 0 ro Pool Fence Kid's Bar Patio -0" • • VAS M d� �� • r 'Turf- _ - • -------------------------------- -------------- — — -------------------T'oat-Fence---------------------— • Concrete Walkway Concrete Walkway- �. 60 — ti •.- .� c • � � � _ � Turf � • � •OO .. _ .✓ _ Turf ' Concrete Cart Path '0v \• \ .Turf ./r • _ - ' QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S ced,os Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 eye 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww. bu rton stud o.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert � Date Description Turf OSi6-211: SDP Submittal 1o.12 09-19-201SDP Submittal N. 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQc""`NiT"''srgr Design Ordinance. o _ 7 Wm. S. urton No.2135 KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES Project Number ` � -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Hotel Pool AH \ �� PA 4 j H1 HS " ALL. Ih PA "5wle �� .� 7� I-2. a05102a 40 L�..�% GR177 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S ced,ns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQc""`NiT"''sryr Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. S. urtan No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement \ f AH Hotel Spa — PA _K�j- -k;' H1 �PA2 �Swle a 05 10 2a 40 L-2.2 GR 178 © 2015 Gensler I QUICK LEGEND & NOTES Trees & Palms Symbol Type Canopy Trees \J-t" Accent Trees Vertical Accents V Palms Shrubs Symbol Description Natural Landscape Enhanced Desert Turf Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. KEY PLAN - PA MC L PA \ CC - SS AH \_f \PA 4 H� PA2 HS L `\ / GR Z v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com L Date Description OSi6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp sTS FO 5 7 Wm. S. urtan No.2135 y Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Hotel Entry Road Scale 1" = 20'-0" IT 0 05 10 20 40 L-2.3 179 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. S. urton No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 \ \ / Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Residential Entry AH \ — f \PA4 �► � PA 2 H S I Snale IT �� 1" = 20'-0" ♦ .,10 ,a \� • �•� ,� l a 05 10 2a 40 � �.. L-2.4 G R � 180 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQc""`NiT"''srgr Design Ordinance. 7 Wm. 5. urton No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L `\�PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES V A Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Residental Landscape AH \\ �� PA 4 H1 H C ♦ PA 2 Swle � 1" = 20'-0" a 05 10 2a 40 L-2.5 GR 181 © 2015 Gensler 3S QUICK LEGEND & NOTES Trees & Palms Symbol Type Canopy Trees \J-t" Accent Trees Vertical Accents V Palms Shrubs Symbol Description Natural Landscape Enhanced Desert Turf Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. KEY PLAN PA MC L \ PA 2 \ CC - SS � 1 / AH \ �� \PA 4 HS ��H1 ► PA2 vo GR Z v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United states burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 eye 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F _ bu rton-studio.com Date Description 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 5 7 Wm. 5. urton No.2135 4tio Project Name ep 31 SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Silver Rock Way Entry Style 1" = 20'-0" IT 0 05 10 2a 40 L-2.6 182 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQc""`NiT"''srgr Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. 5. urton No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number SS 55.7598.000 Description �� GG Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Shared Services Building AH H1 PA 4 �H S PA 2 I Snale �� 1" = 20'-0" IT♦ .♦10 ,a �f 07� l a 05 10 2a 40 �..- �' L-2.7 G R � 183 2015 Gensler Turf \ o \q\ j ash\ QUICK LEGEND & NOTES Trees & Palms Symbol Type Canopy Trees \J-t" Accent Trees Vertical Accents V Palms Shrubs Symbol Description Natural Landscape Enhanced Desert Turf Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. KEY PLAN — PA MC L PA \ CC ` SS AH PA 4 H1 HS► PA2 GR Z v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United states burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 eye 794 7— T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com Date Description 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature C PpCNITECT. 202`Pp ST9F0 5 7 Wm. 5. urton No.2135 y Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Shared Services Building Style 1" = 20'-0" IT 0 05 10 20 40 L-2.8 184 © 2015 Gensler j� QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 v San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cad... Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 1 1 7— T 8581911107 1 < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. S. urton No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number SS 55.7598.000 Description GG Preliminary Landscape Enlargement Typical Guestroom Landscape AH \ �� \PA 4 �H1 H S PA 2 Snale �� 1" = 20'-0" a 05 10 2a 40 L-2.9 G R 185 52015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQEnec"iTEcr,srq Design Ordinance. 5 Wm. S. urtan No.2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a ,n�. PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Site Plan AH \ �� \PA 4 �H1 H S PA 2 I Snale �� 1" = 60'-0" �� • �.� 7� l a 15 30 60 120 GR SP - L-1.1 186 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Symbol Description Lend -ape Ar,hite,mre st„dm y p 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F ElNatural Landscape w ww.bu rton-studio.com Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQc""`N T"7'sryr Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. S. urtan No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Site Plan AH PA 4 �H1 H S PA 2 I Soale �� 1" = 60'-0" IT \� • �•♦ a 15 30 60 120 �— ♦� GR �v SP - L-1.2 87 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. 5 7 Wm. S. urtan No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a „� PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Site Plan AH PA 4 �H1 H S PA 2 I Snale �� 1" = 60'-0" IT \� • �•♦ ,� l a 15 30 60 120 GR �� v SP - L-1 188 © 2015 Gensler 9 �6� FXigtip— // CartP\ \ \ �,A-Tarp X: \ c Turf -- QUICK LEGEND & NOTES Trees & Palms Symbol Type Canopy Trees \J-t" Accent Trees GVertical Accents V Palms Shrubs Symbol Description Natural Landscape Enhanced Desert Turf Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. KEY PLAN PA MC L \ 1PA2 \ CC - SS 1 C 7 AH \ PA 4 �H1 HS► PA GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States burton Landscape Architecture Studio 307 S Cedros Solana Beach Ca 92075 858 794 7204 T 858 794 7207 F www.bu rton-studio.com Date Description 08-i6-2016 SDPSubmittal No.1 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature C PpCNITEC7. 202`Pp srS FO 5 7 Wm. S. urton No.2135 o Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Site Plan Style 1" = 60'-0" 0 15 30 60 120 SP - L-1.4 89 0 © 2015 Gensler QUICK LEGEND & NOTES SILVERROCK Trees & Palms DEVELOPMENT Symbol Type COMPANY, LLC Canopy Trees 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 \J-t" Accent Trees 1 _ \ Vertical Accents Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 V San Diego, CA 92101 United States Palms Shrubs b u r t o n Landscape Architecture Studio Symbol Description 307 S cedrns Solana 13-1, Ca 92075 858 7 4 7204 T 858 794 7207 F < � '�7�ww.bu rton-studio.com `' Natural Landscape w Enhanced Desert Date Description Turf 08-i6-2016 SDP Submittal No.12 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Landscape Totals Existing Turf Area within Project: 594,978 SF Total Proposed Turf Area within Project: 207,623 SF Total Turf Reduction: 387,366 SF Percentage of Turf Area within total project area - 11 Irrigation Irrigation systems are located around the buildings in the landscaped areas. Shrub areas will use high efficiency in -line drip tubing. Turf areas will use matched precipitation spray heads or rotors. The system will be centrally controlled with weather -based ET/ SMART controllers with rain sensors. Notes 1. Based on the net loss of turf area, this plan is SeallSignature in conformance with the City of La Quinta Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Valley Water District's Landscaping and Irrigation System `PQEnec"iTEcr,srq Design Ordinance. 5 Wm. S. urtan No. 2135 y KEY PLAN Project Name a ,n�. PA Mc L \ �PA2 SILVERROCK RESORT & CC RESIDENCES X Project Number ` -1- - SS 55.7598.000 Description Preliminary Landscape Site Plan AH PA 4 �H1 H S PA 2 I Snale �� 1" = 60'-0" IT • a 15 30 60 120 GR SP - L-1.5 90 © 2015 Gensler FOR MO ES LS HEIGH OF TING E L E C T R I C A L LEGEND ABBREVIATIONS NOTEALL SYMBOILS, ABBREVUNEi ARE NTECESSARLYICUSED ON THIS PROJECT (E) EXISTING TO REMAIN MAX MAXIMUM LIGHTING SWITCHING CONTROLS POWER DEVICES WIRING (F> FUTURE MCA MINIMUM CIRCUIT AMPERES (R) EXISTING TO BE REMOVED MFR MANUFACTURER (RL) EXISTING TO BE RELOCATED MIN MINIMUM AB ABOVE COUNTER BACKSPLASH MISC MISCELLANEOUS ACU AIR CONDITIONING UNIT MLO MAIN LUGS ONLY SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL S. DESCRIPTION SINGLE POLE SWITCH (SUPERSCRIPT DENOTES SYMBOL DESCRIPTION SYMBOL DESCRIPTION o RECESSED 2X4 LUMINAIRE J7 �( SINGLE RECEPTACLE - WALL, CEILING, ON ALT. WIRING CONCEALED IN CEILING OR WALL. SIMILARLY MARKED LUMINAIRES CONTROLLED - - - LINE WEIGHT TOP TO BOTTOM= NEW, EXISTING AC ALTERNATING CURRENT MO MANUAL OPERATOR F SURFACE MOUNTED 2X4 LUMINAIRE TOGETHER) 3( -0 I0( DUPLEX RECEPTACLE - WALL, CEILING, ON ALT. TO REMAIN, FUTURE A, AMP AMPERES MTD MOUNTED Ss TWO POLE SWITCH ----- WIRING CONCEALED IN FLOOR OR UNDER GRADE MTR MOTOR AF AMPERE (RATED) FUSE OR -iNEUiRAL(GROUNDED CONDUCTOR) RECESSED 1X4 LUMINAIRE S THREE WAY SWITCH N( 4D � DOUBLE DUPLEX RECEPTACLE - WALL, CLG, ON ALT. --.--- OR ROUTED IN CEILING SPACE OF FLOOR BELOW. CB FRAME NC NORMALLY CLOSED 'On�� SPECIAL PURPOSE RECEPTACLE -WALL, CEILING LINE WEIGHT TOP TO BOTTOM= NEW, EXISTING TO REMAIN, FUTURE AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AFG ABOVE FINISHED GRADE NEC NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE 0 SURFACE MOUNTED 1X4 LUMINAIRE 5� FOUR WAY SWITCH L5-15R ON ALT. POWER; NEMA CONFIGURATION AS NOTED -,NEG NEGATIVE AL ALUMINUM (ALLOY) RECESSED 2X2 LUMINAIRE Sx KEY OPERATED SWITCH Ag RECEPTACLE TYPE SHOWN WALL -ABOVE COUNTER NEMA NATIONAL ELECTRICAL i ASSOC. ALC AUTOMATIC LIGHTING CONTROL NL NIGHT LIGHT (UNSWITCHED) BACKSPLASH. SEE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. AS AMPERE (RATED) SWITCH NO NORMALLY OPEN ❑ SURFACE MOUNTED 2X2 LUMINAIRE D DIMMER SWITCH. NUMBER INDICATES WATTAGE "ON ALT." SHADED RECEPTACLES NOTED 'ON ALT." ABOVE ARET EXISTING WIRING TO BE REMOVED AT CIRCUIT BRKR TRIP SETTING NIS NOT TO SCALE SHADING OF ANY LUMINAIRE INDICATES CONNECTION RATING. IF NOT SHOWN THEN EQUAL TO LOAD. CONNECTED TO ALTERNATE POWER SOURCE (EMERG., —T— TELEPHONE SYSTEM CONDUIT ATS AUTOMATIC TRANSFER SWITCH AUTO AUTOMATIC NP NAMEPLATE Lid • TO ALTERNATE POWER SOURCE (EMERGENCY, UPS, STANDBY, UPS, ETC.) PER CIRCUITING INDICATED —MV— MEDIUM VOLTAGE CONDUIT AUX AUXILIARY OC ON CENTER STANDBY, ETC.) PER CIRCUITING INDICATED Sr MOTOR -RATED THERMAL OVERLOAD SWITCH AWG AMERICAN WIRE GAUGE OD OUTSIDE DIAMTER DUPLEX RECEPTACLE - WALL - HALF SWITCHED BARE GROUNDING GRID OR CONDUCTORS, UON. BAT BATTERY OFCI OWNER FURNISHED CONTRACTOR —G— _ GC_ 0 SUSPENDED LINEAR LUMINAIRE SIZE VARIES ( ) PC PHOTOCELL GROUNDING CONDUCTOR(S) ROUTED IN CODE SIZED BG BELOW GRADE INSTALLED OF01 OWNER FURNISHED, OWNER COMBINATION SWITCH/DUPLEX RECEPTACLE CONDUIT, UON. C CONDUIT (CIRCULAR RACEWAY) INSTALLED t� WALL MOUNTED LINEAR LUMINAIRE (SIZE VARIES) '❑' EQUIPMENT OPERATOR PUSH BUTTON STATION. STROKES INDICATE QUANTITY OF #12 AWG, CAB CABINET OS OCCUPANCY SENSOR PROVIDED WITH EQUIPMENT, INSTALLED AND DUPLEX RECEPTACLE -WALL - WITH INTEGRAL CONDUCTORS, LION. NOTE: WIRING STROKES FOR CB CIRCUIT BREAKER P POLE ® SUSPENDED PENDANT LUMINAIRE (SIZE VARIES) CONNECTED BY ELECTRICAL, LION. GFl GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER 20A BRANCH CIRCUITS ARE NOT SHOWN ON -DRAWINGS. CBI CENTRAL BATTERY INVERTER PB PUSHBUTTON CONTRACTOR SHALL USE INFORMATION CKT CIRCUIT pH, PHASE RECESSED DOWNUGHT, CEILING MOUNTED PUSHBUTTON OR PUSHBUTTONS, BY ELECTRICAL. WP RECEPT. TYPE SHOWN W/ WEATHERPROOF COVER IN PANEL AND BRANCH CIRCUIT SCHEDULES TO CLG CEILING PNL PANEL TC TIME CLOCK AND INTEGRAL GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER PROVIDE REQUIRED CIRCUITING. CO CONDUIT ONLY +,POS POSITIVE O SURFACE DOWNUGHT, CEILING MOUNTED GROUND CPT CONTROL POWER TRANSFORMER REQD REQUIRED �— OS OCCUPANCY SENSOR -WALL MOUNTED +42" RECEPT. TYPE SHOWN AT SPECIAL HEIGHT CT CURRENT TRANSFORMER CU COPPER RNC RIGID NON-METALLIC CONCUIT (PVC) ww oieEcriou-► RECESSED WALLWASH GROUND, ISOLATED DC DIRECT CURRENT IRS RAPID START —� 360 DEGREE OCCUPANCY SENSOR -CEIDNG MID. WALL MOUNTED ELECTRICAL CONNECTION TO HOT DISC DISCONNECT S.A.D. SEE ARCHITECTURAL RECTURAL DRAWINGS t ww oiPECTI_ SURFACE WALLWASH ELECTRIFIED FURNITURE. PROVIDE 8 WIRES NEUTRAL DIA DIAMETER SEC SECONDARY t g4 180 DEGREE OCCUPANCY SENSOR - CEILING MID. ( 4 HOTS, 1 DEDICATED NEUTRAL, 1 COMMON DIV DIVISION SPDT SINGLE POLE DOUBLE THROW ®T RECESSED LINEAR WALLWASH L�Imo' `�f' CORRIDOR/AISLE OCCUPANCY SENSOR -CEIDNG NEUTRAL, 1 ISOLATED GROUND) NEUTRALS HOME RUN WIRING TO INDICATED DESTINATION, SPST SINGLE POLE SINGLE THROW DPDT DOUBLE POLE DOUBLE THROW SWBD SWITCHBOARD SURFACE LINEAR WALLWASH MOUNTED TO BE #10 AWG. USE LIQUID -TIGHT FLEX. 3 3/4"C. MIN. R AS OTHERWISE NOTED. CONTRACTOR DPST DOUBLE POLE SINGLE THROW SWGR SWITCHGEAR COMBINATION OCCUPANCY SENSOR &SWITCH L1A-1,3 SHALL USE CIRCUIT SIZES NOTED IN RESPECTIVE I DWG DRAWING TB TERMINAL BOARD J L�-' RECESSED WALL MOUNTED LUMINARE GANGED UNDER A COMMON COVER PLATE. CLOCK HANGER RECEPTACLE HD1A SCHEDULES AND INFORMATION IN THE FEEDER AND E,EMERG EMERGENCY TEL TELEPHONE OS OCCUPANT SENSOR TO CONTROL ALL LUMINAIRES IN BRANCH CIRCUIT SCHEDULES. EF EXHAUST FAN TYP TYPICAL �3= TRACK LIGHTING WITH HEADS AS INDICATED. ROOM WITH 1/2 LIGHT REDUCTION CONTROLLED BY CONDUIT RUN TURNED UP THROUGH FLOOR OR EMT ELECTRICAL METALLIC TUBING ENCL ENCLOSURE UL UNDERWRITERS LAB ®7 RECESSED CEILING ADJUSTABLE POINT SOURCE SWITCH, DESIGNATED BY LETTER. 2-GANG BOX WITH ❑® FLUSH FLOOR BOX DEVICE - DEVICE TYPE PER SYMBOLS ABOVE CEILING. CORE & FIREPROOF AS REQUIRED. EO ELECTRICALLY OPERATED LION UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED SINGLE -GANG MUDRING, LION SPECIFIED EOL END OF LINE UPS UNINTERRUPTIBLE POWER SUPPLY oa SURFACE CEILING ADJUSTABLE POINT SOURCE 4 O THERMOSTAT -WALL. CEILING. PROVIDED BY MECHANICAL, INSTALLED AND WIRED BY ELECTRICAL. ❑® PEDESTAL FLOOR DEVICE - DEVICE TYPE PER CONDUIT RUN TURNED DOWN THROUGH FLOOR OR CEILING. CORE & FIREPROOF AS REQUIRED. EWC ELECTRIC WATER COOLER V VOLTS EWH ELECTRIC WATER HEATER VA VOLT-AMPERES 4 WALL MOUNTED LUMINAIRE SYMBOLS ABOVE CONDUIT STUBBED OUT AT LOCATION SHOWN. VIED VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE FA FIRE ALARM W WATT E2 L� WALL MOUNTED DIRECTIONAL (SIZE VARIES) EPO EMERGENCY POWER OFF, HEAVY-DUTY, OIL -TIGHT RED MUSHROOM -HEAD PUSHBUTTON W/ GUARD. Q POKE THRU UNIT WITH DUPLEX RECEPTACLE - PROVIDE INSULATED BUSHING &. PULLROPE. FC FOOT CANDLES FLA FULL LOAD AMPERES W/ WITH FLUSH, PEDESTAL MOUNTED. TELEPHONE//DATA SLEEVE THROUGH WALL, ABOVE FLEX FLEXIBLE W/0 WITHOUT Ili FLUORESCENT -POWER FEED SECTION, I� LCP ? LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL AND ASSOCIATED COMPONENTS. PROVIDE 120V OR 277V CONTROL ®® ® ® POKE THRU UNIT WITH DOUBLE DUPLEX � CEILING. E)tTEND TO ACCESSIBLE TILE CLG. BOTH SIDES. TERMINATE WITH BUSHINGS. f11 1.25' CO FPB FAN POWERED BOX WP WEATHERPROOF FSD FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER XFR TRANSFORMER 3 I—� FEED THROUGH SECTION. LENGTH AS SHOWN. SECTION. POWER AS REQUIRED OR AS INDICATED. RECEPTACLE - FLUSH, PEDESTAL MOUNTED. UON. COORDINATE LOCATIONS WITH CABLE FU FUSE '. IN INCHES INSTALLER(S) PRIOR TO ROUGH -IN. GUN GENERATOR, FT FEET I--�i WALL MOUNTED FLUORESCENT STRIPLIGHT TX REMOTE MOUNTED LINE TO LOW -VOLTAGE FUSED COMBO POKE THRU UNIT WITH DUPLEX RECEPTACLE AND TELEPHONE OUTLET -FLUSH, GFl GROUND FAULT CIRCUIT INTERRUPTER UNDERCABINET FLUORESCENT STRIPLIGHT TRANSFORMER. CONCEAL FROM VIEW. PEDESTAL MOUNTED. BASKET TYPE CABLE TRAY WITH 90 DEGREE ELBOW GND GROUND CONTINUOUS LINEAR SOURCE (LED, COLD CATHODE, © ROOM CONNECTOR. SEE SHEET E9.1. ®V ®� MULTI -SERVICE FLOOR BOX CAST IN GONG. OR SHOWN GRAP GENERATOR REMOTE ANNUNCIATOR PNL GRC GALVANIZED RIGID STEEL CONDUIT NEON, FIBER OPTIC, ETC...) IN RAISED FLOOR - SEE ARCH DWGS; WITH RECEPTACLES & SIGNAL OUTLETS AS NOTED. LADDER TYPE CABLE TRAY WITH 90 DEGREE ELBOW SHOWN HLO HANDLE LOCK -ON (OFF) HP HORSEPOWER Y I BATTERY POWER EMERGENCY UNIT EQUIPMENT (SEE POKE THRU UNIT WITH JUNCTION BOX. JUNCTION BOXES, WALL, CEIUNG AND FLUSH FLOOR HPF HIGH POWER FACTOR HTR HEATER LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE FOR QUANTITY OF HEADS) - RACEWAY COMPONENTS RC-700 SERIES. MOUNTED. 4" SQ. BOX MIN., LARGER IF REQUIRED HZ HERTZ (CYCLES PER SECOND) WALL, CEILING MOUNTED. J WIRING EXTENSION POINT -CONDUIT TO MC CABLE OR MANUFACTURED WIRING SYSTEM J-BOX ABOVE G ID INSIDE DIAMETER IISOLATED GROUND Q q ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGN, SHADED QUADRANT INDICATES FACES, ARROWS AS SHOWN TELE/POWER POLE, POWER POLE ® ® ACCESSIBLE CEIUNGS AREAS, OR EXTEND CONDUIT & METAL IMC INTERMEDIATE CONDUIT ® BOLLARD (� TELE/POWER POLE WITH WHIP CONNECTION TO WIRE IN EXPOSED OR "HARD" CEILING AREAS. SHADED= ALT. POWER SOURCE (EMERG,UPS,ETC.) K KEY OPERATED KCMIL THOUSAND CIRCULAR MILS era ELECTRIFIED FURNITURE PB ❑ NiON PULL BOX, MIN. SIZE PER LION. KO KNOCK OUT KW KILOWATTS POLE MOUNTED LUMINAIRE- SINGLE OR DUAL HEAD UNDERFLOOR RACEWAY KVA KILOVOLT -AMPERES INDICATES ROTATED OPTICS DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT Q�� SURFACE METAL RACEWAY WITH RECEPTACLES RECEPTACLES AS NOTED, LENGTH AS FLEXIBLE CONDUIT CONNECTION LTG UGHTING ® POST TOP MOUNTED LUMINAIRE INDICATED ON THE DRAWINGS AND WITH ALL FITTIN GS AS REQUIRED. ® ® POWER CONNECTION TO FIRE/SMOKE DAMPER. REFER TO FSD CONNECTION DETAIL IF NOT SHOWN LCP LIGHTING CONTROL PANEL SYMBOL DESCRIPTION BRANCH CIRCUIT PANELBOARDS, SURFACE AND RECESS MOUNTED, SOLID= 120/280V, HATCHED= 277/480V, DASHEEDD EQUIP. =FUTURE IN -GRADE POINT SOURCE J TWO OR THREE COMPARTMENT SURFACE METAL RACEWAY WITH RECEPTACLES AND OUTLETS AS ® GARAGE LIGHTING LUMINAIRE WITH CUTOFF LOUVERS - INDICATED, LENGTH AS INDICATED ON THE CONTROL CENTER /CODE CLEARANCES PROVIDE ALL FITTINGS AS LUMINAIRE MARKING CONVENTION LEGEND: ®. _ SHOWN, DASHED EQUIP.=FUTURE REQUIRED. HA HA = LUMINAIRE TYPE IDENTIFICATION. SEE LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE. 3c =CIRCUIT NUMBER VIA LOCAL SWITCH TRANSFORMER WITH CODE CLEARANCES SHOWN ELECTRICAL DESIGN CRITERIA ELECTRICAL DRAWING LIST 3c HA (LOWERCASE LETTER) THAT SERVES THE LUMINIARE. -- 3A =CIRCUIT NUMBER/UPPERCASE LETTER -' SERVICE AND/OR DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT WITH CODE CLEARANCES SHOWN 3A COMBINATION INDICATES LOW VOLTAGE --------------- SHEET DESCRIPTION RELAY OR LIGHTING CONTACTOR THAT CONNECTION TO MOTOR PROVIDED BY OTHERS 1. CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; 2013 EDITION SERVES THE LUMINAIRE E0.0 ELECTRICAL LEGEND AND ABBREVIATIONS VFD CONNECTION TO MECHANICAL FURNISHED VARIABLE FREQUENCY DRIVE WITH INTEGRAL DISCONNECT 2. CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE: 2013 EDITION WITH NFPA 72, 2008 EDITION E0.1 ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES AND DIAGRAMS ELECTRICAL TO INSTALL VFD EQUIPMENT 3. CAUFORNIA BUILDING CODE: 2013 EDITION E11.0 OVERALL SITE LIGHTING PLAN �-L1 LJ DISCONNECT SWITCH, SIZE AS NOTED IF NOT SHOWN SIZE PER CONNECTED MOTOR SZE AND SIZE MOTOR DISCONNECT SCHEDULE ¢, AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT, (ADA) E7.1 MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, SHARED SERVICES SITE LIGHTING PLAN (MCI) i LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE UGHTING PLAN (H1) REFERENCE SYMBOLS E1.3 GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PLAN (TER, IJ Q❑-I FUSED DISCONNECT SWITCH, SIZE AS NOTED. SIZE FUSE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS ENCLOSED CIRCUIT BREAKER DISCONNECT SWITCH, TRIP SIZE AS NOTED. 5. CAUFORNIA ENERGY CODE: 2013 TITLE-24, PART 6. E1.4 MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, SHARED SERVICES 517E LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN (MCI) E1.5 LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE UGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN (i SYMBOL DESCRIPTION 12 KEYED NOTE REFERENCE 1 BRANCH CIRCUIT OR FEEDER NOMINAL AMPACITY & DISCONNECT W/ MAGNETIC MOTOR STARTER E1.6 GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN (GR7) .4 TYPE; REFER TO BRANCH CIRCUIT AND FEEDER SCHEDULES FOR WIRE AND CONDUIT SIZES & QTY. (CONTROLLER) OR CONTACTOR. S1ZE PER LOAD SERVED. NEMA SIZE #1 MINIMUM. GENERAL NOTES e REFER TO DETAIL NO. ON DRAWING INDICATED NOT ALL DETAIL REFERENCES ARE SHOWN. ALL ® MAGNETIC MOTOR STARTER (CONTROLLER) OR CONTACTOR. SIZE PER LOAD SERVED. E4.1 DETAILS APPLY TO ALL APPLICABLE SITUATIONS, UON. NEMA SIZE #1 MINIMUM. 1. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ELECTRICAL GEAR, EQUIPMENT AND 2 8 ELECTRICAL CONNECTION, EQUIPMENT PROVIDED BY MATERIALS. ELEVATION TAG: REFER TO ELEVATION NUMBER ON OTHERS. SHADED = ON ALT. POWER SOURCE NOTED E4.1 DRAWING INDICATED Eiii gip ELECTRICAL CONNECTION TO EQUIPMENT WITH INTEGRAL DISCONNECT THAT IS PROVIDED BY OTHERS. SHADED = ON ALT. POWER SOURCE NOTED 2 SECTION TAG: REFER TO SECTION NUMBER ON DRAWING INDICATED EQUIPMESURFACENT OR TERMINAL LIRE AS NOTED, E4 1 AND RECESS MOUNTED �r BUILDING GROUND BUS, SEE DETAILS K11 KITCHEN EQUIPMENT REFERENCE, REFER TO KITCHEN DM CH 1 EQUIPMENT SCHEDULE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION TAG Df$ DAMPER MOTOR BUSWAY RISER EQUIP NAME EQUIPMENT BY OTHERS IDENTIFICATION TAG <« BUSWAY STAB -IN TYPE CIRCUIT BREAKER OR FUSE DISCONNECT. SIZE AS NOTED. SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway To 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC en9in e e re fore aas re lne ale lurure T. i916.934.6103 mjec PManager .1-1he Culver EnogineerNesigner CC 3e rv„mmf 12,16.Po907 0 Data Description 5.16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 1048-20% SDP Submittal No.3 Seal l Signature OQAOFESS/pH�Y .9�>0 CO E , ION f�'YtfOi t1l\iDa�\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ELECTRICAL LEGEND & ABBREVIATIONS Sale ASSHOWN T E0.0 191 m 2015 Gensler LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE LAMPS TYPE IMAGE MANUFACTURER, MODEL&CATALOG DESCRIPTION MOUNTING VOLTS REMARKS LUMENS, NUMBER TYPE COLOR, CRI WATTS Al BEGA #77 263 LED BOLLARD SURFACE 277 LED 3000K 5 TO INCLUDE 300VA 12V TRANSFORMER Bl BK LIGHTING NITE STAR WITH LINEAR SPREAD #NSII-LED-e64-WFL SIGN ACCENT LIGHT SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 7 C1 Q-TRAN LINEAR GRAZE #IQA-VEGA LINEAR LED GRAZER DOWN THE WALL SURFACE 277 LED 2700K EXTRUSION 15DEG C2 Q-TRAN LINEAR IP67 #iQ67-27-50-2.6 LINEAR LED UNDERBENCH SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 2.61 Dl BK LIGHTING NITE STAR##NS-LED-e64WFL TREE ACCENT UP LIGHT SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 7 FIXTURE TO BE MOUNTED INSIDE BOTTOM Fi TMS LIGHTING. —IN. #1005P-10 DECORATIVE LED LANTERN SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 15 OF LANTERN TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT Gl BK LIGHTING DELTA STAR#DS-Li LED TRELLIS ACCENT SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 7 H1 BK LIGHTING HP2#HP2-LED-TR-e64WFL TREE INGRADE UPLIGHT INGRADE 277 LED 27-K 7 Ai a BKLIGHN-LE.TING ICRONITESTAR #RM-25-MN-LEDafi7-NFL-BZP-12-E TREE SUSPENDED DOWNLIGHT TREE RING 277 LED 2700K 7 K1 PENTAIR#LD-211-350 UNDERWATER LED LIGHT RECESSED 3/277 LED 3000K 26 93CRI K2 ,j�l� LIGHTGRAPHIX#LD-DR-350/LWWMB UNDERWATER LED UPLIGHT RECESSED 31277 LED 3000K 12 93CRI Ll BK DENALI WIPOWER CANOPY #DE-LED-x30-FL-PC ROOF MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHT SURFACE 277 LED 27-K 29 L2 BK DENALI W/POWER PIPE GROUND MOUNTED FLOOD LIGHT SURFACE 277 LED 2700K 29 #DE-LED-FL-x30-PPII Mi LUCIFER STEP LIGHT#ISL-ALED-2.7K-NL RECESSED LED STEP LIGHT RECESSED 277 LED 2700K 3.2 WALL N1 METEOR#SH2O0 INGRADE SOLAD LED INGRADE NA LED 27MK NA SOLAR POWERED 01 TIMES SQUARE#LED80P GOBO LIGHT SURFACE 120 LED N/A 80 16OW TOTAL POWER SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway To 619.'57.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC en9l a e e ra for Laas t J lne a le future 1 T.916.934.6193 P_. Manager .1-1ne Culver EnogineerNesigner CC Ja Number. 12.16.Pa907 0 Data Description 5-16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal Ne.2 10481 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal l Signature OQAOFESS/pH�� 9 � CIO ION f�'�tf0i t1l\iDa�\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ELECTRICAL SCHEDULES AND DIAGRAMS Sale ASSHOWN T E0.1 192 m 2015 Gensler OVERALL SITE LIGHTING PLAN ■■■■ I i ■uuu■ KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r — PA 3 L PA cc CC SS AH �� PA a H1 PA 2 HS 2� I GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 &oadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC en gineer. to.....t. n. bil We re T sfasaaro3su Project Manager ne Culver engineerrDesfgner: C A Date Description 5-16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2111 SDP Submittal No, 2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal I Signature oIt US$/pp� g A CO g ION f�'ftFof ickia�\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description OVERALL SITE LIGHTING PLAN Scale ASSHOWN T E1.0 193 02015 Gensler I- 0 s MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, & SHARED SERVICES SITE LIGHTING PLAN SCALE: 1 "-50' r� NOON OOOO i . NNNNNNOO KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r — —\ PA nflc L �PA 2 cc CC SS 1 / AH I PA H1 PA 2 HS I GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.'57.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC .ne�n.er. for L•a 1 n•me "more T.I916.934.5103 9 Pmjec Manager chw1he Cover En�g'Neue��es 9ner CC a .16.P0g07 A Data Description 5-16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.16-20% SDP Submittal No.3 Sea i I Signature oQQ,OFES3/pp� 9N CO g —ION f�'ftFOf C1l\foal\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, & SHARED SERVICES SITE LIGHTING PLAN Sale ASSHOWN T E1.1 194 2015 36n6 / / / / / j MATCHLINE _ , MATCHLINE \\\\ KEYS 7 =I LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE LIGHTING PLAN 1 SCALE: 1 =50' 0 25' 50' 100, KEY PLAN r — PA 3 L PA cc CC SS AH �� PAa H1 HS PA 2 ■ �� GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 &oadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC .ng-- tor..u.tana.i. metre MI GI— T sfasaasro3so Protect Manager ne CNver engineerrDesis— C A Data Description 5-16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 OB-19.2111 SDP Submittal No, 2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal I Signature oIt US$/pp� g A CO g ION f�'ftFof ickia�\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE LIGHTING PLAN Scale ASSHOWN T E1.2 195 5 Gensler A GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PLAN ki SCALE: 1 "=50' 0 25' W. 100' KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r — PA 3 L PA cc CC SS AH �� PA a ;yH1 ' PA 2 HS "so '11sastis GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 &oadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC ..ei...r, r...... t. la..i. future MIGI- T sfasaas�o3su Project Manager ne Culver engineerrDesfgner: C A Date Description 5-16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2111 SDP Submittal No, 2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal I Signature oIt US$/pp� g A CO g ION f�'ftFof ickia�\ Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PLAN Scale ASSHOWN T E1.3 196 02015 Gensler 0.0 0.0 b..0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. � .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0'\ -6 0 '4 0 O 0 a� 0. p 01"0 b. 0 ��0 . 0 0 Op0 *0 . g 0. 0 0. 0 �(�HtO 0 fl 0. + 0 0 0 0. 0 0. 0 � AVERAGE=0. (Fc) a; + b i - -- - AVERAGE-49.0 18 + + + + + `. + '+ + + + *0 + + '0 MAXIMUM=49.0 0 h + F + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MINIMUM=o.o 0 0.0 0,0 0.0 + 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0, 0.0 0 0 0.RL 0� 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.2 0 J�5.650I 00 0.0 0.� 0.0 0. Op0.0 00 0,0 0.0 10.01... d.00o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.1 0.0 1.0 0.1 0.0 4.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 161.40.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 o e. 0. '0,� 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0' m.0 0.4 0.0 0.0;0.9 0.0 1 0 4° 3 . OI . IO 1. s 0. 1 a.- 0 0.0 0.0 0. D 0_. 0 0 0 0. 0 3�' o ._ +TO � + +p - � ,+0.0 + 0 0 G�„0 P2.40.0 0.0 3.7 0.>e 0. /+ 0 0.0 .0 0. �.0�0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.� 0� I 0OO� O0 0.0 0.002.8 0.(P00. 0.0 0.0 0.0 (A.0 0.0A ( 0A.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0'.0 0.0 0.0 2. AD 0, + 0 +.1 + 0 .0 0.Q40:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0. + p 9 + + 0.0 0 . 0.0 +0.0 {0.0 0 0 0.0 0 .<Q o .d1, {0.1 O . b 0.0 0 . 0 0 . 1. 0.0 b : D . 0 0.0 + Q . 0 4 0 .0 0.0 0.0 + A17p.) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0:0 0.0 0:0 0.0 0 + - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..m'0.0 0. + 0 1.6 0 0-0. 0.0 0-SA 0?0 0.0 0.0-0.0 + 0 0.0 Ce2 0.0 �0.0-la,0 0.0 0. p 0 0:0' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 24. 0.0 0.0/ d 0 0.0 '1.0 0.0 0.0 L o 0.1 0 �a o. \0 0.0 0 0. oro o.0 0.3 0.� o z o,ao o.0 0 n 0:© o. o o,o o.p o.o o:o o.o �.o o.o o. �P _ :i (tom + + # } # + # o.o o.o o:o +o.o obi a o.o +o.o o.o 'o o a.1 0.0 0.0 'o.o o.o o.o o.o q o o%/ o o.o 0 0.� o 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 o:e o.o �!g o�.o o. 0 0.3 ,0 0.o fl,�_0.0 0. o.o o. o.o o.o o.o oo.o 0 0 0_0 0 0 0,.0 o.fl o_ o 0 0_0 0 0.0 0.0 o r + o + �+ + 0 0 0.0 0.0 2.3 0 0 0 0. o. 0 )0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0.0 + 1 0+ .0 0 0 2i0,0 + 1 0-d0 0 0+ +p \ / / / °- + + + + ? + + / + + + + + + + + 0. 0 0.0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 0. 0 0., O q. 0 \ 0 0. 0 0/. Oi 0 (3)pOC� . 5 0. 0 . 0 ff 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0 0 2 0 0 .0 0. 0 0\0 0. 0 0. 0' 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 +.\ 0 0 0.0 0 0 0.D 0.0 +0.0 0 .0 Q y�. 0. 0.0 0.0 @.0 0�0 0. .9 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0..0 0 4_-0.0 0 0. / +� + 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0 (�.p 0. 0: / \ 0 Q. 1 0 0 +0.0 0.0/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + .-0 0. O e3 0.1 0.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0. �++0.0 ° + j 10 0.0 0.�0' 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0. +0.0 + .0 0. 0 + . 0 0 . 0 t1>•) 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 0 0. 0 0 y0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 )S 0 0': - �+ 0 0 .5 0 . 0.0.0 0.0 0 . 0.0 0.0.0 +0.0 +Do. .0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0 0 0.0 0., 0 0.0 1 0. 0 �.0 0 0.0 0. 0.0/0.0 0 0/ 0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 p.0 + 0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 +. - 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0I0 0.0 0.0 i3> 7 + F s)D� 0 0,1 1 t 0 0.0 .0 0. 0/ .0 + 0 0.0 0.0 0. j 0.o 0.0 0.0 0 '0.0 .0 0. -- -} 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0.0 + . 0.0 + .0 0 .0 + .0 + 0 + 0, - 0 2; ¢ 0.0 0.0 D' 0 0 0¢ 1 0.0. 0 7..4 .5 .0 + 0 jO. 0.0 0 O.O 0, rO Jk7 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 0 0.0 + .0 0) 0''(�0 0.0 0 0.0 .0 0.0 + . 0 0 . + . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 " 0.0 0 . %M O "5 a' O (� DOt� 0.1 - 0.0 0.0 ( o . Q. o O . o o . + + o +0.0 0 0 o 10.0 0.9 -0.0 0.0 0.0 0 + + + + + + -.-- - Q + l + + + I / + + . o +. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 +.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o o.o o.o o.o +0.0 0.o ?z. ; 0 0 0.0 0. +�0 b.o 0 0 0 0�0:0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0.0 + o + + + + + + + + + + + + nn_r. + + 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o O.o T�1 0.1 0.0 0 0 0.0 O.�Q.0 0 0.0 0. .0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 0. 0 +.0 + 0. :) (3)D1 � U. - / / i 0.0 0 0'fl. �0 �y0 0 0 ° 0 0,0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.a0 0.1 . (s)Et.2 0. A--0.0 0.0 0.0 0.o'0. 0.o +0.0 0.0 0 .0 0.0 .0 0. 0. 0.0 �\ 0. `+41)aI q.0 0. 0 0.0 u ' 'I (6 a' 0.0 0 . 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.p,1.9 o o.o O.o + I � ,l 0.0p-� ��00.0+.00.0 00 �L i o O O'0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0 p.0 0.0 0.0 0°.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 +.0 8 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. .0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 +.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0 . +0.0 0.0 0.0 +0 .0 0 0 0.0 + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0. 0. 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 ;n p + + + ), + + 0 0,0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0. 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 O.E�W -0.0 0®A 1 0.1 3.1/0.3 0.0 @. Q 0 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0 0.0 �+ 0 (1 �y 0 0.0 0.0 + 0,0 .0 +. +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.u�.O-0.0 O.rO(Zt0.0 _0.0 0.0 0 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0 0. o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o wo u.o o.o Flo. _0- 0.0 0.0 0. + 0.0 (3)DS r{ � hh ® Dt 0 0. 0 + . 0.0 0.0 + 0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0 . 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 . 0 0 .0 0('Z�) 2: . 0 0 .0 ,0 . 0" 0.0 0.0 + . 0 0.0 .0 (2)D1. d J'i 1. 0 0.0 0.0 +.0 .0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.(°0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.(2)h4.o f�>Pi +0.00 0.0 0.0 0.0 e f fi)D1 0 0.0 + 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0. 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 V-1T.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0. + 0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0.0 0.0 +.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-,0 010.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 +.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 '.o ' o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 +. .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0. +.0 0.0 0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 'o.o o.0 0:0 0.0 . o 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 .0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,0 0.0 o.o 0.0 0.0 .o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .o o.o 0.0 0.0 +.o o. 0.0 +.o 0.0 0.0 .o 0.0 0.0 0.0 .o 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0. +. 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +0.0 0.0 0. +0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o. +.o o.o o.o o.o o. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, & SHARED SERVICES SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r - -\ PA ^IVlt,c L \�PA2 l.i CC \ SS AH �s�� \PA4 ,c H1 PA 2 HS 1114 GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 F.. 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC 1191,111,for I'usW"ols?'lure T. 916a345103 9 P pclM p CM1nst ne C'Nar Eob Numb r' r 1216 OW A Date Description 5.16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2015 SDP SubmMal W.2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal l Signature oQQOFES9lON�� El s�A CO teI ION rglf OF tPl\t�Q� Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description MEETING CENTER, CONFERENCE CENTER, & SHARED SERVICES SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Scale AS SHOWN E 1.4 197 © 2015 Gem MATCHLINE _ MATCHLINE ° MATCHLi'RE� ( 7 \ a _ INE \ / 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0,70 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0/ 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 o.o o.o +.o o.o ' o.o o.o o. o ' o.o o.o '0.0 0 0.:0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 'o.o 0.0 0: ' I.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o. .00.00 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00 0.O0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 0.00.00.00.00.00.00.0a.00.0a.00.0a.00.00.00.00.00.0 + / 6. + o 6.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 6.0 0.0 0.0 o.o + 0-0.0 +0.0 0.0 0�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 + + + + + + + + + + + + + o o.b o.o'a.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o .o o.o o.o o. o.o 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o�,e o. o.o o. 0 0 0.0 0 �p.o D-0.o o',o +o.o b ®o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o +.o o.o o.0 0 0 '.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0.0 0. o o.o o. o.0 0.0 0 0 ".00 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 'o,0 0.0 0.0'Q. :0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o.o 0.0 0.0 +0.0 +.o 9 ;'4e 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 ro o 0.0 0.0 0.0 `.o o.o In �0 0 In 0 aHo(TfP)O 0.0 +0. - 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 .�o,' 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0. 0.0 0.0 0 .0 0 Ori .0 0.0 0.0 In n + .010. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .00,0006 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0'V..0' IIi 0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 F. 0+ 0 � 0 0 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 bY3 20 .;0 3� .� 0.0 '0.0 0. 0 0 0 0. 10. 0 0. .0 0. 0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 0. 0 0. 0 '0.0 '0.0 0. 0+ CJ r F � 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 :0.0.0 9:0;C 0 - .0 0. 0 0.0--- o.o o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o.o o. o.o L1 -----7 Q 0.0 0.0 0.0 0• +.0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0 + 0. .0 0. 0 + 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0 0. +o. o.,o. o. + 4 .o o. +.o� +.0 0 0�0 0 0 0.0 0 '� o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o:o o.o o.o L_ I I ° 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 + o. 0. 0.0 w0 0. 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 ILLUMINANCE (FC) 0.0 0. .0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 . 0 n' +. 0 0 0. 0+ 0+ 0. .0 0.0 6. 0 0. 0 0 0. 0+. 0 0.0 0.0 AVERAGE=0.07 - (2) ` \ + + �+ MAXIMUM=19.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0. 0.0 0,0 .4 0:0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0,0.0 0. 0.0 0,0 9.0 0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 MINIMUM=0.0 ' ` 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 2 10 FO 0.0 0.0 10 F0 0 0 0 0. 0 +.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0 0 3 0 1 0.0 0.0 0% 0.1 0 0 0.0 0 O b + 0 0 0.0 0. 0 6.0 0.0 0.0 0. +(18)K1 I C d 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 6.0 0.0 0.000. 0.0 M1 y0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 + 0 0.0 +0 �� 0 0; \ .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 \ + 0.0 o.0 o.0 o.0 0.0 o.0 o.0 o.0 0. 0 0 + .0 + 0. 0 0.0 0.0 0 0 + + .0 0.0 + .0 0.0 0. 0�0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 F �F1 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 0: s o o:a 0.0 o:oo: o lo.o .o ' 1y o o.o o.o o. o:``o. �o o.o q.o o.o 10.0 o.9w o.o o.o o.o o. o.o o.o o.o +.0 o.o 0 0.0 0.0 ' oo \.o :® o.0 0.0 0.0 0. � !� EMI 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 .0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0 . 0 6 0 a� 6 5 6�d1. 0 0 .0 0.0 0.0 0. 0! aQ 3a :Q�' .a 0 0.0 0 . 0 Q 0 0 0 . �0.0 0.0 ji 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 o.0 o.0 0.0 0 0. 9 '0.1 o.0 0.0 0:0 o.0 0.0 aj9gl4@ 10.0 + 0. 0 0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 Oa0.0.. 0- (6),11 o.' (6)11 a;. ,i �p (2)D1 0 o.o o.o +0.0 +o.0 0.o o +o.0 +o.0 0.o'0 ��:3'0.0 0:0 +0.0 0:0 '0.0 '0:� 19,70.0 +0.0 .0 .0 +.0 +0.0 +0. �0. 0 0.0 O.Q`+ +0.o 0.0 0.o b.0 o.o o +0.0 +.0 0.o +0. 0.0 0-LD 0 0-0.0 0;0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 . o- a _•,0, .0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0o `� o.o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 o.o o.0 o.o.o.o o.o o. 07 .0.0 011a� oa o o\ C o 1<° 0 , 0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 + . 0 0.0 0. 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 -0 .0 0. .0 + 0 0.0 � ` , • 1 ,.0 .1 (¢)W 0 . 0 + 0 + y{�: 0� 0 � ' 0 0 o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o +.o o.o o.o o o. o. +�� 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. o+ 0.0 0. o. o +.Ev o + 0 0.0 0.0 �p 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.0 0.0 o.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.0 o. 0.0 0`D 0.2 0.0 0.0 01i0 0.0 + �0. 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0+. 0 0. 0 0. 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 11 . (2)610 U. (�" 0(.2)D10 .0 0.0 .0 0.0 0. 0 0. 0.0 0.0 ti 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 o.o o.o 6. a.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0\ 0 `13 G +.0 + 0. 0 0.0 0.0 + 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 .0 0.0 0. o o.o o.o o.o 0.0 0.o o.o o.o 0 o.o o.o o. d 0 0 0.0 o.o0.0o.00.0o.0o.00. 9.00.o+ oo.0o:00.00.o+ o+o o.o .00.00.00.000+0+ o. ' \ 6 \ o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.0 � o.o O.o o.o o.o o.o o.o b.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 o.o o.o o.o o.o� . .0 04.0 + oho 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. )`0---.0 0.0 +.0 0 0. +.0 0.0 +.0 +.0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 +` 0.0 0. ° 0.0 o.o o.o o.o +o.o o.o + o o.o o.o o. + o o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o o. o o.o o. 0.0 0.o o.o o.o +0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 0.0 I o.o o.o o.o o.o o.o + o o.o o.o 0 0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 +.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0.0 o.o o.o o. o 0 0 0.0 0. o. o.o o.o o.oll z�l LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 0 25' 50' 100' KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r -\ PA MC L ��PA2 c \ CC - SS � 1 / AHa l \PA4 �H1 �PA 2 HS G R v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC anglneers for Lsusl,lnable lulu re s10 cle�o ob.e cn T 9169345103 9 P pclM p CM1nst ne CUNar Eob Numb r' r 1216 Po00T A Data Description 5-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-20% SOP Submittal No.3 Seal l Signature oQQ,OFESS/py� CO ION f�9AFOf CPU7�� Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description LUXURY HOTEL & HOTEL SPA SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Scale AS SHOWN E1.5 198 @2015 Gensler UI E ILLUMINANCE(FC) AVERAGE _0 .0�+',. .0 0.0 0,.0 0 MAXIMUM=0.5 MINIMUM=0.0 o �.°' oo. 0 0 0. 0 0 0. 0 -0 '0� d 0.0 0.D 07 �0 _0 0. � 6 . � 0.0 0. 0 - - - - 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.- +.0 0. +, .0 0.0 (2)D1 ,,.0 0 C C.0 .0 c. c.: Q .0 0 i2Sb .0 0.0 0.0 0. 0,-4 9,, o. 0 0. 0+. 0 0. 0 �0 y 0.0 0 k,0.0 i0 0 0. 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 +. .0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0 0.r fipyY 0.0 0.0 �0.0, Q.0 - 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0. 0. .00.00.0+.0+ + 0+0.00.00.00.00.00.00. i 0.0' CO )Dt C L -0_,0. �0 0.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0 0. -O.0 f�.0 u.J 0.0L 0,0 .;.0�0�.0. 0.0 �0.0 +.0 +0.0 +0.0 0.0 0. ,� 0 0 C.:, 0 %-I 0 0.0 0.�0 0 0 +.0 0.0 0.0 0. u., 0.0 0 0.,0 0�0 0.+ ).0� 0 . 0.6 0.f' 0 0:6 0 _ �� e 0 0 1 d- 0.0 .0 0 0.n �.0 0._C C0.0 0.0 +0."` o �0 6.0 0.0 0.0 o�oi a 0 0.0 0. '0-0u. 0.0 .o +0.0 0. o.o o.o o. o 0 0.0 0. 5 0.0 0.0 0. + 0. 0.0 0. 0.0 , 0 GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 SCALE: 1 "=50' 0 25' 50' 100' KEYED NOTES KEY PLAN r -\ PA MC L PA C \ cc SS � 1 / AH �a�l \PA4 ,*<H1 �PA 2 H S Asia as G R v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States GLUMAC ,,gineers for .susin nable lulu,, 911r.1.nnrlme CA9- T.916.934.5103 wvwglumaccom amwnmane9- cnnn n. c.Nar Ennbg nserless giref 12 Number' 12.16 Po00] A Data Description 5-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-20% SDP Submittal No.3 Seal l Signature oQQ,OFESS/py� 9 � A CO ] ION f�9XFuf CPU1�� Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description GUESTROOMS SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN Scale AS SHOWN E1.6 199 @2015 Gens AREA A 22 1 �1��_ AREA B �%, R1 LUXURY BRANDED q RESIDENTIAL,�� SEE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITCTS DRAWINGS, fv � 0 EXISTING ENTRY ROAD, SNOT PART OF SUBMITAL ��W \ I MC - MEETING CENTER CC - CONFERENCE CENTER \ Q \ SS - SHARED SERVICES BUILDING �,. SILVERROCK WAY AREA C b PA 2 0' 4 i— \ Ifl llnll fill � �. �182 PARKINmG SPAU E u C�) - '_ - PA-2 LUXURY HOTEL O \ A 4 PA-4 CONFEERENCE CENTER q PA J 9� < 7 _ A PA 5 & 10A - FUTU E DEVELOPMENT 8 I < NOT PART 017 SUBMITTAL � I, r e 710 EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH / HOUSE PROPERTY LINE AH - AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE HS - HOTEL SPA / H1 - LUXURY HOTEL PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES AREA D GR- GUESTROOMS GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES AH AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE H1 LUXURY HOTEL GR GUESTROOMS HS HOTEL SPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER SS SHARED SERVICE BUILDING Ri LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND r_ r• PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES - - - EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE - — - — - — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL t•00000006000000W ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN — _ VIC AS �PA 2� SS CC cc l AHoJ� H1 HS ,PA2000� o °oo� o�oa 0 GIR Oe I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States zL Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5E0 ARCy C 2 830 �q �Fiv 913C\^^�� P OF CAoll Seel l Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN Scale As indicated 0 38 75 150 300 A -1.0 200 5 Gensler 00 I � % I; 2 6 2825 I'IA R4p —REFER TO DKA FOR ROAD DIME I tj V t - 10GUE PARKING \/ \ t \ \ 21 \ 2 \ r \\\ 7 e \ a wv �� PA 3 \ LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL, `, \ \ \ \ \ \ SEE RESIDENTIAL 6 ARCHITCTS DRAWINGS 5 14 k \ \ \\ \`\ 4GUE T \ \ LAKE �\ , PARK] ES 12 \ Al� 'Ili /, GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES O AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE Hi LUXURY HOTEL OR GUESTROOMS HS HOTELSPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER O SHARED SERVICE BUILDING Ri LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE • — • — • — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL �00000000000000• ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN r — � V A \ — _ MC A S \ \PA 1 2� \ PA 4 > 1 � V\SS ` \ cc AHoJI H1 HIS i❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2256roadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA A Scale 0 15 30 60 120 A -1.1 201 ©2015 Gensler PA 3 R1 - LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL, SEE RESIDENTIAL ARCHITCTS DRAWINGS AH - AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE H1 - LUXURY HOTEL GOLF SAFETY LINES CC - CONFERENCE CENTER- MC - MEETING CENTER' PA 4 PA 2 GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES O AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE Hi LUXURY HOTEL OR GUESTROOMS HS HOTELSPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER O SHARED SERVICE BUILDING Ri LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE • — • — • — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL �00000000000000• ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN /- — _ MC AS l \PA 2 1 PA 4 > 1 � �l ASS CC AHDJI H1 LJ� HSPA2 li p Opo� p�oa GR I V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2256roadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�o ARcy K N,. C 2 830 sT H'P,y 9 9TF OP CAl�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA B Scale 0 15 30 60 120 A- 1 .2 202 D 2015 Gensler I X) -PA 2 - PA 4 -- �� MC - MEETING CENTER - CC - CONFERENCE CENTER SS -SHARED SERVICES BUILDING i �1 \ i � h PART OF SUBMITT R1 - LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL, SEE RESIDENTIAL\ ARCHITCTS DRAWINGS - AH -AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE H1 - LUXURY HOTEL - GOLF SAFETY LINES GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES O AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE Hi LUXURY HOTEL OR GUESTROOMS HS HOTELSPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER O SHARED SERVICE BUILDING Ri LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE - — - — - — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL �00000000000000• ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN r — � I- — _ MC A S _,PA 2� 4 1 PA 4 > SS J \ CC AHBJI H1 HS/ i❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 D RCK ti /Tt0 C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 911113°�^?P 9TF OF CAl�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA C Scale 0 15 30 60 120 A -1.3 203 ©2015 Gensler 100 % VALET PARKING. ADA ' PARKING TO BE HANDLED BY VALET ATTENDANT AT DROP - HS - HOTEL SPA AH - AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE H1 - LUXURY HOTEL PA 2 GR- HOTELGUESTROOMS GOLF SAFETY LINES SERVICE YARD TRASH ENCLOSURE FIRE LANE GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES AH AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE H1 LUXURY HOTEL GR GUESTROOMS HS HOTEL SPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER SS SHARED SERVICE BUILDING R1 LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND r_ r• PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE - — - — - — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL t•00000006000000W ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN r- — _ MC A S �PA 2� 1 PA 4 > SS �� l � cc AH �.�o�� H1 HS DPA2000� O °oo� o�oa O GR Oe I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fax 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States zL Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5E0 ARCy C 2 830 913,L11 P OF CA 1F0 lSeal l Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN -AREA D Scale I 0 15 30 66 120 A -1.4 204 2E LAIC 2015 Gensler GENERAL NOTES BUILDING KEYNOTES AH AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE Hi LUXURY HOTEL GR GUESTROOMS HS HOTEL SPA MC MEETING CENTER CC CONFERENCE CENTER SS SHARED SERVICE BUILDING Ri LUXURY BRANDED RESIDENTIAL SITE PLAN LEGEND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE GOLF SAFETY LINES EXISTING AHMANSON RANCH HOUSE PROPERTY LINE BUILDING SETBACK PER LA QUINT, MUNICIPAL CODE — — — — — — — — — — LANDSCAPE SETBACK PER LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE • — • — • — BUILDING SETBACK PER SILVERROCK RESORT SPECIFIC PL �00000000000000• ACCESSIBLE PATH KEY PLAN r — � I- — _ me A S \\,PA 2� 4 1 PA 4 > � ss l cc AH �.�DH1 HS / 5❑ PA 2O �p0` GR�4000 C I I v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 FaX 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 D K /N c' C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN s j30�� ?P 9TF OP CAL�kO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN - AREA E Scala 0 15 30 60 120 A -1.5 205 ©2015 Gensler w u LUXURY HOTEL ARIVAL VIEW v LUXURY HOTEL WATER FEATURE ,�%4AEL GENERAL NOTES KEY PLAN r — � \IP /- — _ MC A S \PA 2' 1 PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHo��r��'v/v H 1 HS—PAZ li p Opo� �ooa GR I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 ftadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 DAR K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN ei3��^�?P 9TF DF CAI�fG I Sol/ Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbef 55.7598.000 Description BUILDING RENDERINGS A - 2.0 206 ©2015 G—n , SPA ARIVAL VIEW vF u LUXURY HOTEL POOL DECK it GENERAL NOTES KEY PLAN r — � I- — _ Mc A S \PA 2' 1 PA 4 > 1 � SS �I cc AH- �oJl H1 PA 2 o O pOoo pooa GR I V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 ftadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 DAR K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN ei3��^�?P 9TF DF CAI�fG Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbaf 55.7598.000 Description BUILDING RENDERINGS Scala A-2.1 207 ©2015 Gensler CONFERENCE CENTER ARRIVAL CONFERENCE CENTER GENERAL NOTES KEY PLAN r — --\\ L� \ \PA 3 f — —\— — MC \ l \PA 2 PA 4 > 1 � CC AHoJI H1 HS/ i❑PA2 O Opo� p�oa GR I V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 ftadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05.15.201: SDP SUBMITTALN01 09-19-2016 SDPSUBMITTALNO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL N0 3 DAR K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN ei3��^�?P 9TF OF CAI�fG Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbaf 55.7598.000 Description BUILDING RENDERINGS Scala A - 2.2 208 ©2015 Gensler SPA ARIVAL VIEW LUXURY HOTEL POOL DECK GENERAL NOTES KEY PLAN r — � L \ \ — _ _ MC \ \PA 2� 1 PA 4 > 1 V\SS cc AHoJI H1 HS/ i❑PA2 O Opo� p�oa GR SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 ftadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05.15.201: SDP SUBMITTALN01 09-19-2016 SDPSUBMITTALNO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL N0 3 D AR K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN ei3��^�?P 9TF OF CAI�fG Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbef 55.7598.000 Description BUILDING RENDERINGS A - 2.3 209 '015 Gensler SEE EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHEETS FOR PROPOSED LIGHT FIXTURE IMAGES GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 1 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLOR 1 4B METAL FASCIA - COLOR 1 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL TRELLIS - COLOR 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 5C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL, BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERA/ 50 INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS 5F GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL 6A SITE WALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE I TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE I TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA THERMOPLASTIC POLYOLEFIN (TPO) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A. BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN r — � I- — _ MC A S \PA 2� 1 PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHoJI H1 n 2 HS/ i❑PA2 O Opo� p�oa GR I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR YU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PEN 91111 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Nu.lbw 55.7598.000 Description MATERIALS BOARD Scale 0 25 50 100 200 A - 3.0 210 ©2015 Gensler UPPER ROOF h LOWE 11' 6" _ LEVEL 0" LEVEL01 31'-0" ABOVESEA LEVEL 4 H1 - NORTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = l'-0' _UPPERR 0 LOWER11' 6" LE$ 0' LEVEL01 31'-0" ABOVESEA LEVEL 3 H1 -WEST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = l'-0' UPPER ROOOF LOWER1�1 6" V LEVEL 01 h o' V LEVEL01 31'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 2 H1 - SOUTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = l'-0' UPPER1RgOOpF h LOWER ROOF h\P n'-s• LEVEL 01 h 0" LEVEL01 31'-0" ABOVESEA LEVEL H1 - EAST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" = l'-0" GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ _ MC A S \P1 A 2� PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHOJI H1 HS/ T❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 9I3°�^?P 9TF OP CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbef 55.7598.000 Description HOTEL EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS S.I. 0 4 8 16 32 H1 - A-1.011 © 2015 Gensler _POOL BAR ROOF h 0-6• _ LEVEL 01 h_ 0" 4 H1 - HOTEL POOL BAR -NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118"=T-0' POOL BAR R $ 11' 0" V am 3 H1 - HOTEL POOL BAR -EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = P-0" DOL BAR ROOF h 0" LEVEL 01 2 H1 - HOTEL POOL BAR -SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0' )L BAR R0 1' - 0" LEVEL 01 $ o" V H1 - HOTEL POOL BAR -WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" V-0" GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 5C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL 6A SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING 8A POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN r � I- — _ MC A S \PA 2� 4 4 1 PA > 1 � 1 V\SS l�cc AHOJI H1 n HS/ 1'❑PA2 O Opo� p�C>a 000�0�� I GR\� V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fac 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16.2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL N0 3 Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description HOTEL POOL BAR EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS I Scale 0 4 8 16 32 H1-A-1.212 ©2015 Gensler T.O. PARAPET EL.18'-6"— ----- ------- HOTEL GUESTROOM, - II SEE GUESTROOM DRAWINGS - HOTEL PORTE-COCHERE 1 EL. 16'-0" 8A E] TERRACE 233 - 7 314" T.O. PARAPET EL. 18' - 6'r 8A OF OF WALL EL. V- �\ 2 4e _ r � GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN AND/OR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L \ _ MC A S \PA 2� 1 PA 4 > V\SS }` \ cc AHOJI H1 HS/ T❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description 05.15"2015 SDPSUBMITAN01 0-9-20DPSUMTTAL No 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 KU��y.ED K RCti/T� C 2 830 A sT 'PFN 911113°�^?P 9TF OF CAl�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbef 55.7598.000 Description HOTEL OVERALL ROOF PLAN Scala 0 4 8 16 32 H1 - A-2.0 13 ©2015 Gensler 8" — — — ----------------� Hi-A-1.0 — 1 ,' • HOUSEKEEPI i3 \ \ Jf - OFFICES ME302 SF CHANICAL L---1 _.— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - HOTEL OMEN PORTE-COCHERE SO 1;7 SF ffEWENE.NVALETBOH-MEN 80 SF 180 SF LINEN- SERL CE 8`13" R UDIN YARD HO \ O SOH CORR. WALL80 LIDING GATE B'-0' FRONT 1114 SF SOILED _ r 177 SF n 239 SF _ _ 1 � -- STORAGE HOUSEKEEPIN \ r — — — — BAR 142 SF STORAGE �\ PANTRY EXECUTIVE t80 SF 1185E 0783 SFS FRONT EMPLOYEE HOTEL DESK BREAKROOM SERVICE YARD LOBBY BAR 120 SF 295 SF (OPEN TO ABOVE) 1142 SF WOMEN MEN LOBBY/ 422 SF 422 SF FIRE COMMAND/ WATER FEATURE, LOUNGE RETAIL RETAILS SECURITY SEE W APE 3550 SF CONCIERGE 300 SF 300 SF 170 SF 107 SF EXTERITRASHOR S ORAGE BAG EXTERIOR // CONCIERGE 124 SF 2 /��Hi-A-1.0 , L , — — — STORAGE 747 SF RECYCLE / � 138 SF 747 SF STORAGE 118 SF I I CAN SASH I I L--— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- RETAIL BAR KITCHEN l � i 508 SF 340 SF 1951 SF ROOM 1 SERVICE AREA 421 SF / / \ 3-MEAL 1351 SF TERRACE, ' X PRIVATE NING KID'S CLUB - SEELANDSCAPE ., 564SF 44 SF - DRAWINGS DINING TERRACE " L - STAIRS --------- HOTEL SPA ENTRY, SEE HOTEL SPA DRAWINGS / / 'POOL - / FENCE & GATE HOT GII STROOM, SE GUEST DOM DRAWN S DN i A SPA HOTEL(I\ 31 S POOL DECK, 153 SF \ - Hi-A-1.0__ \ \ SEE GUESTROOM DRA INGS �✓ 7�7 5'-0" POOL FENCE & GATE POOL DECK, SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS POOL 5625 SF 12 — —TOWEL STAND 150 SF WOMEN 325 SF SERVICE YARD WALL 8'-0" 2 Hi -A POOL EQUIPMENT 685 SF 1 77 MEN 325 SF SERVICE YARD OPEN TO ABOVE) POOL BA 690 SF R POOL BAR & GRILL KITCHEN 690 SF DINING 5'-0" POOL TERRACE FNCE & GATE ------------ 1J Hi - A-1.2 GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TEXTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN AND/OR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L \ MC A S \PA 2) 1_ PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHOJI H1 ��/�9 LJO HS/ ❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619 557 2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States L Date Description I "15.201: SDPSUBMITAN01 0-9-20DPUMTTALNO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�0 ARcy K NF%L/TF C 2 830 1 sT 'PEN 913°�^?P 9TF OF CALxl 0 Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description HOTEL OVERALL FLOOR PLAN Scala 0 4 8 16 32 H 1 - A-3.0 14 © 2015 Gensler UPPER ROOF -4" LOWER ROOF 10' 2' �I .I Iym'L FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY 4 NORTH ELEVATION BUILDING (SEE SCALE: 1/8" =1'-T CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) 3 WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V.0" 2 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = l'-0" UPPER ROOF 4°y LOWER 1a-2" LEVEL 01 FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) UPPE 4„ LOWER 0?4 .22" LEVELO 0'-0" FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) UPPER 4 z-4„ LOWER ROOF $ 10'-2" I � I � I LEVEL D1 h FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE SOUTH ELEVATION CONCEPT GRADING GRADING .PLANS) SCALE: 1/8" =1'-T GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ _ MC A S \PA 2� 4 1 PA 4 > SS CC AHoJI H1 _ HS/ DPA20000` GR` O I v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fac 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�0 ARcy K N,. C 2 830 1 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description GR 1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scale 118" =1'-0" 0 4 8 16 32 GR1 -A-1;0 ©2015 Gensler 12'-4" 4 Ems' 49-0114' V \ — ------ —________________ I I I � EXTERIOR WALL BELOW f I / o 8A P E�T 8A BW � I I I i h 1 -- r------------------ I , 1 m i " I I i I r I I + - y Pery T � 'D O BEF W i 1 II i + t I i I i 4E I 1 2 ROOF PLAN FLOOR PLAN -0 4 1n' 11- A' T, 2 R1-A-1. GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT 1 CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TEXTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING SDK ICh'/), �C15 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 sT 'PFN 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 91111 �?P 9TF OF CAi-iyo 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Project Name L SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES MC `A�\ i - Project Number �PA2 > 55.7598.000 ��PA4 \^!,/ Description ss GR 1 FLOORPLAN & ROOFPLAN CC AHoJI H1 HS Scale PA20000 O �poo p�oa 1/8"=1.0.1 , �O O� GR ° I G R 1- A-2.0 v 216 © 2015 Gensler 1Z-a" 25'-6' 4 i i I I i O R2-A-1. 1 6 ROOF PLAN R2-A-1. 1 m EXTERI — WALL B I ! OPEN EL. 10' 2" ,n BELOW eA Ir -- I r )a{ OPEN 14 BA BELOW 1 1. 4E m 3 R2-A-1, 4 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 3 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: Ile" = V-0' 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1I8' =1'.0' — UPPE 4" LOWER ROOF h LE� FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) — UPPER OF LOWERROOF� m'-r LEVE 0'-01. FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) UPPE 4 LOWER n0 10' 2" FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) — UP - 4„ LOWER 0?' O J I I I I I I I I I I I 2 ! I, J _ LEVEL 0p10L FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING FLOOR PLAN WEST ELEVATION (SEE CONCEPT 5 GRADING SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0" SCALE: 1/8" =1'-O" PLANS) GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TEXTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN AND/OR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 8C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ _ MC A S \PA 2� 1 4 PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHoJI H1 �n HS/ i❑PA20000` O0p0�\��p��a GR`/�' �i�000� Lt I O I v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5 K RCti/T� C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 91111 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description GR 2 PLANS & ELEVATIONS Scale 1I8" = 1'-0" GR2-A-1.0 217 ©2015 Gensler 25' 6" 21' 8• I 4E --------------------- I 1 EL. 17-2' EXTERIOR WALL BELOW + - EL. 101-2' Y / - 3 EL. T 6" I f 4 I i 6 ROOF PLAN 5 FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0" — UP PER ROOF gL 4• LOWER ROOF h 1a-2• � I LEVEL 01h a -a FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) 4 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8' = V-0" UPP 4, LOWER ROOF h 0' 2" LEVEL 01 $ a-0" FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) 3 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" R3-A-1. UP i — — — J= — k— — — — _�� 4 - LOWERROOF� 10' - 2' V 23'-n" in' - It• d' -T 349 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 118" =1'-0" WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =1' 0" LEVE 0'-0" FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) 2'-y. uPP� LOWERROOF 10'-2" LEVEL W a -a FINISH FLR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK 1 CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TEXTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4c METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL AR 7 PAVING I FLOORING �C15 SK N, h. , D V � 2� t� 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR I 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 C 2 830 sT 'PFN s I3°�^ 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 �?P 9TF Op OpL�pO 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & L RESIDENCES Project Number MC A�` i�/-55.7598.000 2 PA4 Description �!�,� ss GR 3 PLANS &ELEVATIONS CC AHoJI H1 HS Scale PA 20000 1/8„ =1, p„ �O O� GR°I GR3-A-1.0 v 218 © 2015 Gensler m 4 NORTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" = V-0" 3 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 118"- VT 2 SOUTH ELEVATION SCALE: 1/8" =1'-0' WEST ELEVATION SCALE: 118" = V-0' 13BF9 UPPE�4" _ LOWER 0'-4„ L Y FINISH FUR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) IPPER ROOF 4' JWER R 0' 4' EVEL 01 h 0' - 00' FINISH FUR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) UP 4. LOWER ROOF h 10'-4-4' LEVEL 01 0'-P V FINISH FUR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) UPPE 4" LOW ERROOFh 10' - 44" LEVE 0' 0" FINISH FUR ELEV VARIES BY BUILDING (SEE CONCEPT GRADING PLANS) GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN AND/OR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ I- — _ MC A S \PA 2� 1 PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AHoJI H1 n HS/ DPA20000` GR` O I v SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 'lop 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbef 55.7598.000 Description GR - 4 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scale 1I8" = 1'-0" GR4-A-1.0 219 ©2015 Gensler 0111111ilpm, 25'-6" 1 21'-8" 2 ROOF PLAN n EXTERIOR WALL BELOW 3 R4-A-1. R4-A-1. 1 FLOORPLAN -0 2 3 R4-A-1. GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PILASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TEXTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA-COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL No 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL RCh'/), 7 PAVING I FLOORING SDK �C15 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 sT 'PFN 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 s I3°�^ �?P 9TF OF CpL�pO 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN Project Name r SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number MC `A�` i�/-55.7598.000 2 PA4 > \^!,/ Description ss GR4 FLOORPLAN & ROOFPLAN CC AHoJI H1 HS Scale D PA 20000 1/8" = 11_0.1 O OOoo p�oa �O O� GR71z° I G R 4- A-2.0 v 220 © 2015 Gensler JI) LEVEL 03 LEVEL02 11'-6' LE 0' LEVEL01 30'-0" ABOVESEA LEVEL 4 HS - NORTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = V-0' L 5'-3" LEVEL 02 h 11' - 6" LEVEL 0" LEVEL01 30'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 3 HS - EAST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" = V-W LEVEL03 LEVEL 02 11' 6' LEVEL L 0' LEVEL01 30'{I" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 2 HS - SOUTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" = l'-0" EVELV� 3" LEVEL 6 h 1' 2,$ LEVEL 01 �\ 0' LEVEL01 30'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 1 HS - WEST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" f-0' GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ _ MC A S \P1 A 2� PA 4 > 1 � SS CC AH- H1 HS—'❑�PA2 li p Opo� p�oa GRY�' V SILVER ROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�0 ARcy K N,. C 2 830 1 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVER ROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Numbaf 55.7598.000 Description HOTEL SPA EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scala 0 4 8 16 32 HS - A-1.021 © 2015 Gensler ,GOLF SAFETY SETBACK LINE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE Nl` 3 TOP OF WALL EL. 5' - 0" ,r E WOMEN'S TOP.OF WALL EL. B'-0° l GARDEN — - TOP OF WALL E-E, -6' -- — _ SPA 2 S-A-1. ENTRY _1 I L. I � I � I I \ 1�0 GENERAL NOTES SILVER ROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER — COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER — COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TE)c LURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN AND/OR TRELLIS - COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITE WALL AR 7 PAVING I FLOORING SK N, h. , D �C15 V � 2� t� 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 ` �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 'f q 't sT 'PFN 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 s I3°N^ �?P 9TF Op CpL�pO 8 ROOFING Sol/ Signature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN Project Name r L SILVER ROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES VIC i — Project Number `A�` 2 PA 4 > 55.7598.000 vPA \^!, �� Description ss HOTEL SPA OVERALL ROOF PLAP f CC AH,o- H 1 - �2O Scale HS ❑�PA 2 � li Opo� �ooa 1/16" = V-0" p �Oo 0 48 16 32 GR�000p H S A-2 O I . 222 © 2015 Gensler JI) 183' 7" GOLF SAFETY SETBACK LINE - PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINE POOL FENCE 5'-0" 324' - 9112" 70' T. 70'-11112" O AHMANSON PROPERTY RANCH \ PROPERTY LINE I 3 ((�<.0, � 210 SF ---------- I ICIEIWINEJ MECH.I BAR POOLED. 1 213 SF 320 SF 41 STAIRS \ I MEWS lfl��DN I /\ GARDEN POOL FENCE F-O" MEN'S \ HS-A-1.0 4 HOTELSPA POOLDECK ts TREATMENT ROOM 116 SF LOCKER ROOM \� r III /A 1680SF�'/�%% \/ _ � SALON I /\ 850 SF RAMP=-- \\ ADJA \LUXUR OTEL� \ \ \ 1 i II I LOBBY LOUNGE 414 SF ON ---------------- - CO-ED WATER FEATURE EXTERIOR TERRACE LOUNGE 41 CORR. CORR. SHAENTRY 2 HS-A-1.0 590 SF 1434 SF 853 SF RAMP UP /\ / \ WOMEN'S GARDEN / ` ` 05 SF STUDIO ROOM 500 SF FITNESS CENTER 1124 SF / li /\ LOCKER ROOM Y L--------_—,; / \ 1680 SF \ / I I POOL FENCE 50 r— —------- --- OR— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — r — — \- CORR. 41. i ----------------- 1— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — BON — 532 SF I TREATMENT / ROOM 201 SF I 1 I _ a I I \J ---- ----- ----.._—J L— ----- —J HYDRO 3C TREATMENT TREATMENT TREATMENT ',ROOM ROOM 141 SF', 1165E 113ROOMSF TREATMENT ROOM 141 SF MM �"A GENERAL NOTES SILVER ROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER- COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TEXTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa 619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3O PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA -COLORS 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL R,h'/), 7 PAVING I FLOORING SDK �C15 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR I C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE I TILE PAVING- COLORS 9TF OF CAL\yo 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Prolect Name \ SILVER ROCK RESORT & \ \ \ RESIDENCES \ \ MC `A�\ i - Project Number �PA2 > 55.7598.000 ��PA4 ^ Description ss HOTEL SPA OVERALL FLOOR PLAN CC AH,-o-J—��p/ H 1 S.I. HS ❑�PA 2 00� li p Opo� �ooa 1/16" = V-0" �o �� 0 4 8 16 32 GR°�°-"� ; H S - A-3.0 223 © 2015 Gensler d � U V U U MEETING CENTER BUILDING 1 - ` T.O.PARAPET _ — 1 EL. 15'-6' - . T.O.PARAPET - 1 �� T.O. PA BE EL. 15'-6' - ` - EL. 16 - 6' gq 111" TO. PARAPET rI V EL28'-0" J BA I 8A I8p L e EL. 13'-6" + I 1 I E� EL T.O:fARAP T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET E EL. 15'- EL. 16-6' EL. 28'-0" .. —___ ... T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET eq EL.16'-6" EL. T.O. PARAPET 8A EL. 23'-0" EL� EL. 20' 0" T.O. PARAPET EL. 16' - 6".� I CONFERENCE CENTER BUILDING 4E EL. 11'-6" U SHARED SERVICES BUILDING I EL. 18'-0' EL18'- I � 8A BA TOP OF WALL EL. 16' -6- EL. OPEN T MECFiANI t r V BELQ T.O. PARAPET EL. 18'-0" T.O. PARAPET T.O. PARAPET EL. 23' - 0" T.O. PARA EL. 23'-0' EL. 1P.6" GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3C0ATCEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TE)c LURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4c METAL FASCIA- COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA- COLOR3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 5C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITE WALL AR 7 PAVING I FLOORING SK N, h. , D �C15 V � 2� t� 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 'f q 't sT 'PFN 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 91111 �?P 9TF OF CpL�pO 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Project Name L SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES _Mc Project Number PA4/ \` PA 2i�rl 55.7598.000 Description �1 SS OVERALL CONFERENCE cc CENTER/SHARED SERVICES AH____ ' H 1 BUILDING ROOF PLAN -gyp/ �2 Scale \o � 1s 39 sc O GRvv�o OCC - A- 1 1.0 224 ©2015 Gensler GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TE)CTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL RCh'/), 7 PAVING I FLOORING SDK �C15 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 9TF OF CpL�pO 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Prolect Name L SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number i - Mc 55.7598.000 �IPA2 > ��PA4 \ tt1l��jj Description ss OVERALL CONFERENCE CC CENTER/SHARED SERVICES AH �.fioJ\ H 1 BUILDING PLAN -gyp/ �2 HS-PA Scale 2 � OOoo pooa 1"=30'-0" O \o p pow �Q O O 0 6 15 30 oC GR I OCC A-2.0 C I 225 T © 2015 Gensler MC ROOF V 13'-6" LEVEL 0"$ LEVEL 01 29,V ABOVE SEA LEVEL 4 MC - NORTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" =1'-0" MC ROOF 13'-6" _ LEVEL 0" LEVEL 01 29' 0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 3 MC - EAST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" = V-9' U" Y LEVEL01 29'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 2 MC - SOUTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" MC ROOF h 13-6" LEVEL 01 h 9" V LEVEL 01 29'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL MC - WEST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16' =1'-0" GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN � — _ Mc A S \ \PA 2� \ ' PA 4 > v SS cc AHoJI H1 2 HS DPA2 O Opo� p�oa GR I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 KU��y.ED RC K ti /T(n C 2 830 1 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description MEETING CENTER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scale 0 4 6 16 32 MC -A-1.06 ©2015 Gensler 1 GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER — COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER — COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TE)CTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 OSan 3D Diego, CA 92101 United States PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4c METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL AR 7 PAVING I FLOORING �C15 SK N, h. , D V � 2� t� �t 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING- COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 C 2 830 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 9TF OF CpL�pO 8 ROOFING Seallsignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & L RESIDENCES Project Numb9r Mc FA�\ i - \PA24 PA4 55.7598.000 > 1 I Description ss MEETING CENTER OVERALL ROOF cc PLAN AHH 1 ,-o- �2 HS Scale , PA 2 � 1/16" =1'-0" \� p �� 16 32 �O�o�O GR /��./��"" MC - A-2.0 j 227 ©2015 Gensler 4" 25' 0' /i 3 r------� MEETING R OM02 #3 \ L- - i III i i 3C III EXTERIOR MEETING PRE-FUNCNON ROOM k4 3468 SF 773 SF EXTERIOR BOH CORR. MEETING 1126 SF \ ROOM 1*2 L 000 SF I I I MEETING 2 ROOM#5 C-A-1. oJ 773 SF \ � I I ❑ I WOMEN \ 275SF I I MEETING \ 7 275 SF ROOM 1000 SF ROOM #6 i 1005 SF , VALET BUSINESS-- _ OFFICE CENTER- _ �`---- 150 SF 213 SF --"j -- — — _ EXTERIOR _ ENTRY CORRIDOR 3401,SF --- --� -----------------J i i i I I o I I t i I �O \ _-_ _--_--------------------------------------- BANQUET BANQUET AV STORAGE 5185E 1300 SF BOH CORR. 4586 SF I 8510 SF BALLROOM I 0 I I I LOBBY PRE -FUNCTION 713 SF 5571 SF I I I 0 0 I ` L-------- - - - - - - GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TEXTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 30 PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN _ Mc — ' PA 4 > v SS cc AHoJI H1 2 HS PA O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United Statee Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 5�o ARcy K N,. C 2 830 1 sT 'PEN e I3 °�^?P 9TF OF r XL _ Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description MEETING CENTER OVERALL FLOOR PLAN Scale 1116" =1'-0" 0 4 6 16 32 MC -A-3.0$ ©2015 Gensler 4 CC - NORTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116' =1'4' 3 CC - EAST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116' =1'4' a� 2 CC - SOUTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116' = V-0" CC - WEST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116' = V-0" !4e TOP OF PARAPET EL..28' CCCC R 29' - o' LEVEL 01 LEVEL01 29'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL U" Y LEVEL01 29'-G' ABOVE SEA LEVEL CC ROOF � LEVEL 0' LEVEL01 29'-0' ABOVE SEA LEVEL CC ROOF 2o'-a" LEVEL o"JI LEVEL 01 29'-o' ABOVE SEA LEVEL GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ —\— _ MC �1 \PA2 )41 PA4 > SS CC AHoJI H1 HS DPA2 O Opo� p�oa GRY�' SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 KU��y.ED RC K ti /T(n C 2 830 1 'lop 9TF OP CAl�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description CONFERENCE CENTER EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS Scale 1116" =1'-0" 0 4 8 16 32 CC - A-1.029 ©2015 Gensler GENERAL NOTES SILVERROCK CEMENT PLASTER DEVELOPMENT 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI COMPANY, LLC 1B 3COATCEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 2 TE)CTURED WALL 92253 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS Gensler 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 3c WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 Diego, CA 92101 OSan 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR United States 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4c METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIORTRELLIS- COLORI Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 1 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERATIO 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL AR 7 PAVING I FLOORING SK N, h. , D �C15 V � 2� t� 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 �t C 2 830 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 9TF OF CpL�pO 8 ROOFING SeallSignature BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE NOT FOR 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE CONSTRUCTION KEY PLAN r Project Name L SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES MC ` i - Project Number �PA2 > 55.7598.000 \ ��PA4 Description ss CONFERENCE CENTER OVERALL cc ROOF PLAN AHH 1 ,-o- �2 HS— Scale � Opoo pooa O \o �� 0 4 8 16 32 GR //� CC - A-2.0 I 230 JI) ©2015 Gensler MEETING ROOM #4 773 SF MEETING ROOM #5 773 SF WOMEN 275 SF MEN 275 SF MEETING ROOM #6 1005 SF I I I I I/ IN EXTERI B IIIIIIIIIIIIIt 11 2C6 O_ c C-A-14 I I I I milli. 3 BANQUET T I BANQUESTORAGEGEl F 18SF 1300 SF S BANQUET R KITCHEN 3277 SF I LOADING DOCK SOH CORR. 2819 SF 4586 SF I SECURITY 180 SF - - EXTERIOR r BOH CORR. BOH CORR. 1955 SF 1701 SF BALLROOM 85M 0 SF WOMEN MEN 559 SF 559 SF MEETING ROOM #7 220q SF 2, CC-A-1. HUMAN -- RESOURCES ESTIBUL o OFFICE 68 SF rn ... - - 111 SF N BANQUET STORAGE GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TEXTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3O PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ \PA3 f — —\— _ MC �1 \PA2) PAAlia > SS CC AH6Jl H1 n 2 HS/ i❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2258roadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 91111 9TF OF CAL1f0 Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description CONFERENCE CENTER OVERALL FLOOR PLAN Scale 1116" =1'-0" 0 4 6 16 32 CC - A-3.031 ©2015 Gensler -- RESOURCES ESTIBUL o OFFICE 68 SF rn ... - - 111 SF N BANQUET STORAGE GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TEXTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3O PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ \PA3 f — —\— _ MC �1 \PA2) PAAlia > SS CC AH6Jl H1 n 2 HS/ i❑PA2 O �po� p�oa GR V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 2258roadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 91111 9TF OF CAL1f0 Seal I Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description CONFERENCE CENTER OVERALL FLOOR PLAN Scale 1116" =1'-0" 0 4 6 16 32 CC - A-3.031 ©2015 Gensler SS Rn 13'-6' LEVEL01 0' LEVEL 01 29'-0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 4 SS - NORTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE. 1.116' =1 0 SS ROOF h 6' LEV� 6" LEVEL01 29'-0' ABOVE SEA LEVEL 3 SS - EAST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" BsROO � LEVEL L 0'$ LEVEL01 29' 0" ABOVE SEA LEVEL 2 SS - SOUTH OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1/16" =1'-0" _ SS R 13'-6' LEVEL 0' LEVEL01 29'-P' ABOVE SEA LEVEL SS - WEST OVERALL ELEVATION SCALE: 1116" =10" GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ —\— _ MC �1 \PA2) PA4 > SS CC AHoJI H1 HS PA O Opo� p�oa GRY�' SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN 9I3°�^?P 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description SHARED SERVICES BUILDING - EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS scale 0 4 6 16 32 SS - A-1.0 32 © 2015 Gensler GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ —\— _ MC �1 \PA2) PA4 > SS CC AH- H1 HS DPA2 O �po� p�oa GR � V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fa619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description SHARED SERVICES BUILDING OVERALL ROOF PLAN Scale 0 4 8 16 32 SS - A-2.0 33 ©2015 Gensler GENERAL NOTES CEMENT PLASTER 1A 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLORI 1B 3-COAT CEMENT PLASTER - COLOR 2 2 TE)CTURED WALL 2A STRIATED PORCELAIN TILE, NATURAL STONE TILE OR MASONRY UNIT WALL OR SIMILAR 3 WOOD 3A WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE SLATS 3B WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE TRIM 3C WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE GATE 3D PAINT GRADE DOOR WITH ACCENT COLOR 3E ACCESS DOOR WOOD OR WOOD COMPOSITE W/LOUVER 4 METAL 4A GLAZED WINDOW AND DOOR FRAMES - COLORI 4B METAL FASCIA - COLORI 4C METAL FASCIA - COLOR 2 4D METAL FASCIA - COLOR 3 4E METAL COLUMN ANDIOR TRELLIS - COLORI 4F METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN -COLOR 1 4G METAL MECHANICAL SCREEN - COLOR 2 4H OVERHEAD DOOR 4I VEGETATED SCREEN WALL 5 GLAZING ALUMINUM FRAME WITH DARK BRONZE 3-COAT KYNAR FINISH OR SIM ALL FRAMES TO BE THERMALLY BROKEN 5A INSULATED GLASS STOREFRONT/ CURTAINWALL SYSTEM 5B LAMINATED GLASS SKYLIGHT 6C OPERABLE INSULATED GLASS WALL,.BI-FOLD OR MULTI -SLIDE OPERAI 5D INSULATED GLASS DOOR 5E HERCULITE DOOR OR SIMILAR WITH MONOLITHIC LAMINATED GLASS SF GLASS GUARDRAIL 6 MASONRYWALL O SITEWALL 7 PAVING I FLOORING 7A. INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/ TILE PAVING COLOR 1 7B INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE/TILE PAVING- COLOR 2 7C INTEGRAL COLOR CONCRETE OR STONE TILE PAVING- COLOR 3 8 ROOFING BA POLYVINAL CHLORIDE (PVC) ROOFING SYSTEM OR BUILT UP 2 PLY ROOF - WHITE COLOR 9 SIGNAGE 9A BUILDING IDENTIFICATION SIGNAGE KEY PLAN L� \ —\— _ MC �1 \PA2) PA4 > SS CC AHoJI H1 2 HS DPA2 O �po� p�oa GR � V SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 Gensler 225 Broadway Tel 619.557.2500 Suite 1600 Fac 619.557.2520 San Diego, CA 92101 United States Date Description 05-16-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO1 09-19-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO2 10-18-2016 SDP SUBMITTAL NO 3 AR KU��y.ED K N, ti. C 2 830 1 sT 'PFN s 9TF OF CAI�fO Seal / Signature NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description SHARED SERVICES BUILDING OVERALL FLOOR PLAN Scale 0 4 8 16 32 SS - A-3.0 34 ©2015 Gensler \ R o L�� •,CC/ SETBACKS Back 1 II o , � 1 II �, -7 6 7 -6 Proposed I Property Lined I _I I Proposed I 1 Setback Line I 1 II II LFront I J O p H 0 oo oCU ED = N co00 "X ` a.t Note: L Exceeds setbacks as s, described in the "Specific o�\ Plan", Table 12 PA4 s str civil it diensiodm,ensio for ° n Casitas. i 36.5 / 37.5 7 \ V"v J I I II 9ENERAL NOTES Site Tabulation: Site Area: 599,914.27 S.F. = 13.8 Acres Program Summary (House + Garage): 7 Plan 1 - House & Garage 7 x 4,575 S.F. = 32,025 S.F. 6 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath & Garage 0 6 x 4,895 S.F. = 29,370 S.F. 4 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath, Casita #1 & Garage 4 x 5,286 S.F. = 21,144 S.F. 1 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath, Pool House, Casita #1 & Garage 1x 5,785 S.F. = 5,785 S.F. 1 Plan 3 - House & Garage 0 1 x 5,595 S.F. = 5,595 S.F. 6 Plan 3 - House, Casita #1 & Garage 6 x 5,784 S.F. = 34,704 S.F. 2 Plan 3 - House, Pool House, Casita #1 &Garage 2 x 5,949 S.F. = 11,898 S.F. 2 Plan 4 - House & Garage 2 x 5,528 S.F. = 11,056 S.F. 29 Total Units Total Square Footage = 151,577 S.F. Open Space Area: Site Area: 599,914.27 S.F. = 13.8 Acres Total Building Footprints = 151,577 S.F Driveway Areas 0 = 33,324 S.F. Streets With Parking = 84,867 S.F. Sloped Open Spaces 0 = 46,055 S.F. Total Covered Site Areas = 315,823 S.F. Provided Open Space: Site Area = 599,914 S.F. Covered Site Area = 315,823 S.F. Total Open Space = 284,091 S.F. Total % Open Space 47.4% KEY PLAN SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA z�, Date Description 5.16.2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09.19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal/Signature 4F'a1,, a A 09p,,,r�s �°-36313 P 9� °F 0,1At .1E I Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Conceptual Site Plan Scale 0 15, 30' 60' 120' R1-1 PA 3 Copyright ® MARK GROSS &ASSOCIATES, INC. AR rights reserved 235 9GioG - — 1r D 3/.5 2 o1 0R,QO F 1 � 158'-6" — . ,✓ `\, \ - f ��TJ � '� I Back � o , 'I I' Proposed I Property Line I Proposed 1 I Setback Line--) I 1 1 'I I' II II LFront I O O O J H a) H o O o m �= 00 N Note: Exceeds setbacks as described in the "Specific Plan", Table 12 PA4 Casitas. A�� \ Roa \ 1 v w i \ I >247 \ \ seenvi awingsfor„\ I ,i reel di lions � I ze I 20� �I -v 34.5 I I vv I � L 3 .� 33 5 /' i� i W 16 33.0 Site Area: 599,914.27 S.F. = 13.8 Acres Program Summary (House + Garage): 7 Plan 1 - House & Garage 7 x 4,575 S.F. = 32,025 S.F. 6 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath & Garage 0 6 x 4,895 S.F. = 29,370 S.F. 4 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath, Casita #1 & Garage 4 x 5,286 S.F. = 21,144 S.F. 1 Plan 2 - House, Pool Bath, Pool House, Casita #1 & Garage 1x 5,785 S.F. = 5,785 S.F. 1 Plan 3 - House & Garage 1 x 5,595 S.F. = 5,595 S.F. 6 Plan 3 - House, Casita #1 & Garage 6 x 5,784 S.F. = 34,704 S.F. 2 Plan 3 - House, Pool House, Casita #1 & Garage 2 x 5,949 S.F. = 11,898 S.F. 2 Plan 4 - House & Garage 0 2 x 5,528 S.F. = 11,056 S.F. 29 Total Units Total Square Footage = 151,577 S.F. Open Space Area: Site Area: 599,914.27 S.F. = 13.8 Acres (`.nvprpri Rife ArpnQ- Total Building Footprints = 151,577 S.F Driveway Areas 0 = 33,324 S.F. Streets With Parking 0 = 84,867 S.F. Sloped Open Spaces 0 = 46,055 S.F. Total Covered Site Areas = 315,823 S.F. Provided Open Space: Site Area = 599,914 S.F. Covered Site Area = 315,823 S.F. Total Open Space = 284,091 S.F. Total % Open Space 47.4% SETBACKS KEY PLAN SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 ® tit.if . t s~ A Data Description 5-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09.19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10484016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal ISignature ��9ED MCNrr Y'c•24a1a`4o ^y J) \1 OF GItF Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Conceptual Site Plan Scale 1" =60'-0" 0 15' 30' 60' 120' R1-2 PA 3 Copyright C, MARK GRO58 &ASSOCIATES, INC. All rights reae= 236 Front Elevation Rear Elevation ni= Left Elevation Right Elevation SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, u1 WNYA CA 92253 Date Dexriown 5-1e-201a 2DMbml1W1No.1 9.7.2DI6 PLnebgReA- 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 .ham 2 ms� oF nw% PYujac Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES P,*. NmrBar 55.7598.000 0¢samllcn Plan No.1 Conceptual Eloy0m'A' 9— D 2 d :$ R1 -3 PA 3 Capyrlght A b,%RK GR--R23",7eclA7as. nic. All nghle r... rcrd Front Elevation Rear Elevation Left Elevation Right Elevation SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, ILA WNYA CA 92253 iQ clot. Deurkallon S-19-2 " sw1b S.w-litalm.. 1 9741)19 pw—mg $Z- 09-19-20 6 SDP Submittal No. 2 10-18-2016 SDP Submittal No. 3 P1uj.c Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES P,*. W.mb.r — 55.7598.OW Plan No. 1 Conceptual EWYWon W S— "6.0 - - - - 6- 0 2 4 a I R14 PA 3 VARX --s23&—Es, r- All nUilbL. P,,-,d I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I I I wall I 1 I I I I I I I I I I Elevation 'B' Roof Plan ---------------------------------- I I I I I I �Flal Roo° I I I L I I I Flat Roof I Flat Roof I I I I I I Parapet Wall 1 -Flat Roof I Fla[ Roof I I I I I �I -Flat Roof Skylight CMU Wall I Parapet Wall I ______L----------------- I -Flat Roof I -Flat Roof Flat Roof I I I I I I I IL I I I I I I I Elevation 'A' Roof Plan SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 U C'mg_ 0 Date Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09.19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal 4F'�gE0 R " -24313 Fu' O v OP CAl\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 1 Conceptual Roof Plans Swle 1/8" =1'-0" 0 2 4 8 16 R1-5 PA 3 Copyright © NARK GROSS &ASSOCIATES, INC. All rights reserved junior Master Option Floor Plan m ® I edro m 2 4•-2. 12'-0 I ® I I I I I 3,936 sq. ft. Theater Option SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 q a a U n U1 _ O � ro Cmg 0 Date Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 11-132011 SDPSubmiltal No.2 10.18.2016 SDP Submittal No.3 �Q A�N'rF^ 4F'�gE0 "C C-24313 Fu' ,r 9� O 9 � CAL\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 1 Conceptual Floor Plan S.I. 1/8" =1'-0" 0 2 4 8 16 R1-6 PA 3 Copyright © NARK GROSS &ASSOCIATES, INC. All rights reserved A A Front Elevation Rear Elevation Left Elevation Mir n Right Elevation 5 SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-1 N AHMiANSON LANE, LA QUKFA, CA 91253 Es m � V °m e r D.0 Da..011w 51E-1118 SDP 9NMntwlNo.t 9,74119 Planon0 Pit-11 . 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Stall lS7Dnyum P .A YC i�817'��`lr 74� I'k r DF �,tl Paojecl Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES P.JJ.d N".1aer//�� 55.759B. V�-11��11 VU D—Ip0im Plan Na, 2 Conceptual Elevatlon'X goal. I D 2 m S s RI-7 PA 3 Atli rtghW read Front Elevation Rear Elevation Left Elevation 3Right Elevation e SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-1 T9 AHMANSON LANE. LAQUINTA CA 92253 rn � fulllA V r D] DMr Deacrision 51E-1118 S[IP 9uMntwlNo.t 97.2010 Pl.nun0 Ft-s . 09.19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No Sad 1 S2Dlulitm P .A 0, CA I Pxnjacl Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES law.j.l. Nlh lber//�� 55.759B. V�-11��11 VU D—lpdon Plan No. 2 Conceptual Elevation W seat. I RI-8 PA 3 c-- fhl o -P.D (1 — 24*C1-- INC. Atli rtghW reu—d ---------------------—-------—---- I I I I I I I 1 I I TT Parapet Wall II I II 1 I II. 1 I I Parapet Wall Built Up Grovel Roof II II LJ I 1 I I 1 I I 1 Elevation '6' Roof Plan ---------------------------------- I I I I I I � iar Hcof I I I I I I Built Up Gravel Roof I Parapet Wall Parapet Wall I I II II II II II II Li I I _ Met Root II I II I II II II J I I I I I I -----------------------------------� Elevation 'A' Roof Plan SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 U A Date Description 5-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1&2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 2 Conceptual Roof Plans S.I. 0 2 4 6 16 R1-9 PA 3 Copyright ® MARE GROSS & ASSOCIATES, INC. All rights reserved i4� Pool House Option Casita Option #2 499 sq. ft. - For Lots +160' 499 sq. ft. - For Lots +1 60' Casita Option #1 391 sq. ft. - For Lots + 13 5' 90, ------------------------- Outdoor � Sftowe Pool Bath r , I I I nll I I I Cov ed tdoor sm Dini Sp e %< Ref. 1 ' 0" Ceil IAA� r F L I ° °^ Covered Ou cooMas[ r Suite Kitchen Livin Sac I 1U-0• Ceumg g p za• x 14' m•-0• ceumg m•-0• Cailin ❑ Ir Co.k p l Rd. 00 I I Ovens I oo I I-------- 6.12 1 Wand x Gr at' o'om AbaJB�at n�— — — — — — — — — — — — - r I ❑ M' SI ping g O 1x 24 I � II Down 12' II ------- b--=in --� �r- ' Down Wire Pdr una I Entry 12" Rer. Wne Room , I � Laun. r nD Forecourt FAU 1 I 1 = Bath Roof Abgove L O Golf Cart Space 1 12' x 15' 1 Bed oom 4 ■ rt-- 1s ^x16 1 Floor Plan I ' anity ster Bath r-0" Ceiling I I �Lin.n a i I I slantl A.C. I ® 7.-1 edroo 14' 13' 3 x 10'-0" Ceiling O 'M ® 1 Broom 2 1 "" Ceiling I r I I ;arage zr 10'-0" Celling ' 1 1 1 1 4,223 sq. ft. SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 A a � c ro �mg 0 Data Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1&2016 SDP Submittal No.3 �Q A�N'rF^ 4F'�gE0N "C C-24313 Fu' P O 9�9 � CAL\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 2 Conceptual Floor Plan S.I. 1/8" =1'-01. 6 R1-10 PA 3 Copyright Qo MARK GROSS & ASSOCIATES• INC. All rights reserved �44 Front Elevation f 14. Rear Elevation Left Elevation i Right Elevation SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE. LA []1 JKTA. CA 92253 L. moue DenrlPNon 510-2016 SOP Su0rIlittal NaA ,11,, 47-316 PloanMO NauNw 09.19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.18-2016 SDP Submittal No.3 a.., 1sig—l— Prcpml Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Pri.ra7ramba 55.7598.000 o.ral�awa plan No. 3 Conmptaal Elimfiort'N ISow 118' =1'-0* J) 0 d E 1S R1-11 PA 3 Capyn iht gi NARK GROSS Y ASSOCIATES, INC AS rIjbl re -l. Front Elevation w t:. Rear Elevation I I I Left Elevation I I � 00 ❑ I Right Elevation SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE. LAGUINTA CA 92253 o Iri t� "-DAN DwMplloa 6.1E-mo SOP Subm1aw No.1 9-72016 P11"'w41;w1#w 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18.2016 SDP Submittal No.3 $.nlf BiOn�lur� f �CQi313 �'�`A i � CR4IF Pfa I Now SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Prepee! Nwih.r 557598.000 D...ipll. Plan No. 8 Conceptual BmUm T Scale 116" = t'•D" R1-1 2 PA 3 246 ' <•s • Wh- NARK GROSS & tiTCfATEn, INC. .All xA&U rea —d ---------------------------------- I I I I I I —Flat Roof I I PamPet Well I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I -Flat Roof I I I I I I I I I I I I Y II 1 I I I I I I I I I I PamPet Wall I I I I I Built -Up Gravel Roofer I I ~11 To Porch Below I Flat Roof I I Built -Up Gravel 1 I I I I I —Flat Roof II I I II II Flat Roof Ropf� I I I I I I I Parapet Wall I I I I I I I I Elevation '6' Roof Plan ---------------------------------- I I I I I I I I I I I I —Flat Roof I I I I I Parapet Wall I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I •—.Flat Rol I I I I I I —Flat Roof I I I I I I I I I ~on To Po ch Below I I Parapet Wall I Flat Roof I I I I I I Built -Up Gravel Rooter I I I o I I I I I I I I I -----------------------------------J Elevation 'A' Roof Plan SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 U A Date Description 5-16-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1162016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal 4F'asEON Ap�PST�.. " -24313 d' OP CAUCF Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 3 Conceptual Roof Plans Scale 0 2 4 & 15 R1-13 PA 3 Copyright © MARK GROSS & ASSOCrIA�TES, INC. All rights reserved /47 Casitas Option #2 451 sq. ft. At Lots 165'-0" + Deep Only uwuu�u Ills V Tankl 0 Loren B droom 3 oir 1-o• x 1r " 3 i I I O Casitas 16'-0" x 14'-0• I � ❑ I I I I I Casitas Option #1 Additional 189 sq. ft. n] ------------------- I I Pool House Ago a" Sink Ref. , IN r------------------- ---1 I I I I I I I I I I I � I I I I .. Maste Suite Pool House Option 454 sq. ft. At Lots 165'-0" + Deep Only = r INCHII 0 0 y - Bedroom & Ba. 6 Option I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I F I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I O I r I I I I I I I I M MW11 Lounge 17'6 -" x 19'-0" rs-0^a�a Island ! Ref. Covered Outdoor Living Space 27-6' x 16'-0" <IOvens Gnll � Pantry D Kitchen Cooktop Sink Ref. > /I R I Room in om 9 s•-o• x z 6'• I I I I z•-G•ceii g O ly}� at oo 8" n 18'-3" Scre /i 0' C fling Abov 9 I I � ❑� I I I I � - 0 ® Entry i I 2 .2 3 Office / Opt. Bedroom 5 16-0'x.14•-0" Suite I I avatar water '-�91ft• IT�ific ��edrdom$ hBa. � I I I I I I l L J I I I 90, Floor Plan Master Bath HEON JIM wide 4msll� irQl Irm:d x ' 2" -------------- I I I I 4,953 sq. ft. SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 5 w w a U1 _ O m � o�g L Data Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1&2016 SDP Submittal No.3 .Ia R 4F'�gEptl �N'rF^ "-24313 Fu' v � CAl\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 3 Conceptual Floor Plan S.I. 7=1'0" 6 R1-14 PA 3 Copyright Qo MARK GROSS & ASSOCIATES• INC. All rights reserved �l Ad tri Front Elevation Rear Elevation loin oil rnmff! 171 Left Elevation 0 0 O Right Elevation 0 SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE. LAGUINTA CA 92253 oil: MIPAPG "-DAN DwMp11o3 6.16-mo SOP Subm1aw xo.1 9-72016 Pl1"`w4Rwl#wl 09-19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18.2016 SDP Submittal No.3 $�all6i0a�lur� ��9;a 3kGy! 1 ' I 1 T � CR41F SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES li—h . 55.7598.000 Plan No. 4 concept w Bevapm 1 �10 10 =1' D" 16 R1-1 5 PA 3 Copyright ra MARK (MOSS & AS3DCMM INC. All alahu ... - ed Front Elevation Rear Elevation Right Elevation Left Elevation I SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE. LAGUINTA CA 92253 oil: II G o v� "-DAN DwMialloa x19-mo SOP Su9eIIDW No.1 9-72016 Pig"'W4 RwIew 09.19-2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10-18.2016 SDP Submittal No.3 W l Si0n'lu. f �CQi313 �'�`A j1 � CR4`F PaojICE Na'M� SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES 55.7598.000 Plan No. 4 conceow a vaum T I 10 =1'-D" R1-16 PA 3 Copy.IEh- A.ARN (MOSS & &MCMM INC. .All xJgkta rm _-d mevduurl t5 KUUT ridrl SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 U A 0 Date Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1&2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal 4F'�gE0 A�ry'rFp "C C -24313 Fa' P 9�O 930 Of CAt\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 4 Conceptual Roof Plans Swle 1/8" =1'-0" 0 2 4 6 6 R1-17 PA 3 Copyright Qo MARK GROSS &ASSOC^IATCES, INC. All rights reserved 4) Office/Yoga Room Option 1341_411 Bedroom & Ba. 5 Option SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, LLC 79-179 AHMANSON LANE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 U A 0 Date Description 516-2016 SDP Submittal No.1 09-19.2016 SDP Submittal No.2 10.1&2016 SDP Submittal No.3 Seal 4F'�gE0N A�N'rF^ " -24313 Fu' P OP CAl\F Project Name SILVERROCK RESORT & RESIDENCES Project Number 55.7598.000 Description Plan No. 4 Conceptual Floor Plan Swle 1/8" =1'-0" 6 R1-18 PA 3 Copyright Qo MARK GROSS & ASSOCIATES, INC. All rights reserved rl4� ATTACHMENT 4 City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 PHONE:760.777.7125 FAx:760.777.1233 APPEAL OF DIRECTOR/COMMISSION DECISION APPLICATION CASE NUMBER(s) (OFFICE USE ONLY) Sections A. B and C are to be completed by the applicant in their entirety and shalt be accompanied by afl listed plans, studies, reports and exhibits listed in Section D unless specifically waived bv the appropriate City staff member and noted thereon. SECTION A PROJECT INFORMATION Project Name- Site Development Permit 2016-0005 Please identify the type of action being appealed; ❑ Planning Commission Decision Of October 25, 2016 ❑ Director Decision Public Works Determination ❑ Other Please identify each Design and Development Case No. and/or Condition(s) of Approval being appealed: 1 j Approval of a site plan, architecture and landscaping for a 140 room luxury hotel, 29 hotel -branded residences, a spa, a meeting and conference center, and a shared service facility, for planning areas 2, 3 and 4 of the SllverRock Specific Plan 2) Finding of consistency with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003, Appeal of Planning Comm issionlDirector Decision Application Page 1 of 4 City of La Quinta - Planning Division - 760.777,7125 05,15.16 R\Application Submittal Forms%pplicationslAPL1APL Application - 05.15.Mdoc 253 SECTION B STATEMENT OF APPEAL Please provide sufficient information so as to make clear each issue being appealed and the grounds upon which your appeal is based. Please use additional sheets if needed. See Attached which outlines: 1) VIOLATION OF COACHELLA VALLEY MULTIPLE SPECIES HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR ALLOWING TAKE OF SHEEP AND FAILILNG TO BUILD SHEEP BARRIER 2) VIOLATION OF PREVIOUS CITY APPROVALS ISSUED FOR THIS PROJECT FOR FAILING TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS REQUIRING SHEEP BARRIER 3) VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR FAILING TO SUPPLEMENT THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW DUE TO CHANCED CONDITIONS AND NEW INFORMATION 4) VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FOR FAILING TO ENFORCE MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRING SHEEP BARRIER 5) VIOLATIONS WITH FULLY PROTECTED MAMMAL ACT FOR ALLOWING TAKE OF SHEEP 6) VIOLATIONS WITH ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT FOR ALLOWING TAKE OF SHEEP 7) VIOLATION OF THE PUBLIC TRUST Attached in Support of Appeal: Letter to City Council dated November 8, 2016 Exhibit 1: CDFW PeninsulaBighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report Exhibit Bighorn Institute Monthly Updates FebruaryOctober 2016 Exhibit 3: Letter from US FWS and CDFWS dated February 28, 2014 Exhibit 4: 60 Day Notice of Intent to Sue dated September 27, 2016 Appeal of Planning Commission/Director Decision Application Page 2 of 4 City of La Quinta - Planning Division - 760.777.7125 05.15.16 P:%pglication+ Submittal Forms\ApplicationsiAPLWL Application - 05.15.16.doc 254 SECTION C - APPLICANVOWNER INFORMATION Applicant D. Wayne Brechtel for Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity (858) 755-6604 (Name) (Phone) 462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 100, Solana Beach, CA 92075 dwWbwordenwilliams.com (Mailing Address) (Ema f) Applicant Certification l certify that l have read this application packet in its entirety and understand the City's appeal process. Applicant's Signature: Date: �r Print Name: Lj r.r 13reck4.-i . A orP%,& pa. I ,0nr ilay.4s Owner Certification 1 certify under the penalty of the laws of the State of California that 1 am the property owner of the property that is the subject matter of this application and l am authorizing and hereby do consent to the filing of this application and acknowledge that the final approval by the City of La Qiuinta, if any, may result in restrictions, limitations and construction obligations being imposed on this real property. Owner/Authorized Agent Signature': Print Narne(s): Date: SECTION D - APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Additional information may be required based on review of the project description. Submittal waivers may be obtained through staff consultation, a pre -submittal meeting, or a preliminary review application. No applications will be accepted by mail, APPLICATION SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS— INITIAL C3 BE COMPLETED BY CITY STAFF # of E- V '� m # of copies DF in P Waiver 2 Each of the followingitems is required for submittal. i� a paper format OK'd by copies ton OD_ (initials) ROM) FILING FEES ❑ NA Filing Fees Receipt 0 1 NA APPLICATION INFORMATION 0 NA Application w/Statement of Appeal 0 1 NA Appeal of Planning Comm ission/Di rector Decision Application Page 3 of City of La Quinta • Planning Division • 760.777.7125 05.15,16 P.1Application Submittal FormslApplicationslAPL1APL Application - 05.15.16.doc 255 SECTION E - SUBMITTAL ITEM DESCRIPTIONS FILING FEES Filing Fees are to be paid at the time of application. As part of the submittal process you will be asked to pay your fees at the Finance Department counter and return to the Planning Division counter with the receipt showing payment of fees which will be copied and submitted along with the other application materials. APPLICATION INFORMATION Application: A City application form complete with all requested information and original signatures provided. Statement of Appeal: The statement of appeal portion (Section B) of the application explains what decision or portion of a decision is being appealed and why. Please be specific and cover all issues you wish to appeal. If you have any questions regarding filling out the Application, pleasecontact the Design and Development Department at (760) 777-7125. Appeal of Planning Commission/Director Decision Application Page 4 of 4 City of La Quinta - Planning Division . 760.777.7125 05.15.16 PAlApplication Submittal FormMApplicationVAPLLAPL Application - 05.15.16.doc 256 Exhibit 1: California Department of Fish and Wildlife Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report 257 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE PENINSULAR BIGHORN SHEEP 2015 ANNUAL REPORT A cooperative effort by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and California Department of Parks and Recreation This report presents information on the status, distribution, and management of peninsular bighorn sheep in eastern San Diego County and portions of Riverside and Imperial Counties for 2015 Authors Janene Colby and Randy Botto South Coast Region 258 I I California Department of Fish and Wildlife Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Annual Report 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary.........................................................1 Background......................................................................3 Capture and Radio-collaring..........................................3 Radio Collar Status..........................................................4 Population Size and Estimation....................................5 Respiratory Disease........................................................5 Cause Specific Mortality and Survival ..........................6 Lamb Survival and Recruitment....................................8 Distribution and Movement........................................11 San Jacinto Mountains................................................12 Central Santa Rosa Mountains...................................12 Southern Santa Rosa Mountains................................15 Vallecito Mountains...................................................16 Threats to Recovery.....................................................17 San Jacinto Mountains..............................................17 Northern Santa Rosa Mountains...............................17 Central Santa Rosa Mountains..................................17 Southern Santa Rosa Mountains...............................19 Coyote Canyon...........................................................19 Northern San Ysidro Mountains................................19 Southern San Ysidro Mountains................................20 Vallecito Mountains...................................................20 Carrizo Canyon...........................................................21 FutureActions...............................................................22 Citations.........................................................................23 California Department of Fish and Wildlife South Coast Region 3883 Ruffin Road San Diego, CA. 92123 www.wildlife.ca.gov 259 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Desert bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) inhabit the desert slopes of the Peninsular Ranges of southern California and extend into the mountains of Baja California in Mexico. The population within the Peninsular Ranges was first listed as threatened in 1971 under the California Endangered Species Act. In 1974, the population was estimated at 1,171 (Weaver 1975) but by 1996 the rangewide population estimate had declined to only 276 adult sheep (USFWS 2000). Peninsular bighorn sheep were listed as a federally endangered population segment in 1998 (63 FR 13134) due to: 1) habitat fragmentation, degradation, and loss by urban and commercial development; 2) disease; 3) predation coinciding with low population numbers; 4) response to human disturbance; 5) insufficient Iamb recruitment; 6) nonnative toxic plants; and 7) prolonged drought (USFWS 2000). Presently, the population of desert bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges is considered to be stable to increasing based on the most recent 2010 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) rangewide survey estimate of 955 bighorn sheep. In order for CDFW to estimate ewe (female) abundance it is necessary to maintain radio -collars on at least 25% of the ewes within each of the 9 recovery regions within the Peninsular Ranges. At the beginning of 2015, there were a total of 94 active radio -collars throughout the Peninsular Ranges (89 ewes & 5 rams). This represented only 16% of the ewe population rangewide. During the fall 2015 capture an additional 91 active radio -collars (84 ewes & 7 rams) were deployed in the San Jacinto Mountains (SJM), Northern (NSRM), Central (CSRM) and Southern (SSRM) Santa Rosa Mountains, Coyote Canyon (CoQ Northern (NSYM) and Southern (SSYM) San Ysidro Mountains, and Vallecito Mountains (VM) recovery regions. In 2015, there were 13 radio - collared sheep mortalities (11 ewes and 2 rams). Mortalities by recovery region were: NSRM = 1 ewe, CSRM = 1 ewe, CoC = 2 ewes, SSYM = 1 ewe, VM = 2 ewes, and Carrizo Canyon (CC) = 4 ewes & 2 rams. At the close of 20151 29% of the ewe population was radio -collared with a total of 171 active radio -collars throughout the Peninsular Ranges (161 ewes & 10 rams). A field -based capture is tentatively planned for October 2016 to fill any remaining radio -collared gaps prior to the rangewide population survey in November 2016. From 1992 to 2016, on average, 12% of all active radio -collared sheep died each year of which 7% was due to predation. In 2015, only 7% of all active radio -collared sheep died of which 3.2% were due to predation, 2.2% California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 1 260 the cause was unknown, and 1.6% was attributed to nonpredation. The average age of radio -collared ewes in 2015 was 7.1 years with a range between 1.5 and 19 years (n = 173). In comparison, the average age of radio - collared ewes that died was 12.0 years with a range between 8 and 16 years (n = 11). In 2015, average rangewide survival of radio -collared ewes was 87%. Over the past 5 years (2011 — 2015), average survival of radio -collared ewes from highest to lowest was SJM (100%), followed by VM (98%), NSRM (93%), NSYM (91%), CC (91%), CSRM (88%), CoC (86%), and SSYM (80%). Survival statistics were not available for the SSRM due to lack of radio -collared sheep. CDFW has monitored Iamb survival (survival to 3 months) and recruitment (survival to 1 year = yearlings) within 2 to 5 recovery regions from 2008 to 2015. The percentage of 2015 Iambs that were recruited to yearlings was lowest in CoC (10%), followed by the NSYM (11%), the "urban" ewe group in CSRM (11%), the "wild" ewe group in CSRM (33%), and the IKP ewe group in CC (35%) recovery regions. Typically, Iamb survival levels below 30% indicate the presence of Iamb respiratory disease within a ewe group. Clinical signs of Iamb pneumonia have been documented in all 5 recovery regions; however, rates of Iamb survival and recruitment have varied by ewe group, season, and year. For the past 8 years, the average recruitment ratio has been very low (18%) in both CoC and NSYM. Presently, there is substantial genetic variation and gene flow among bighorn sheep populations within the Peninsular Ranges and across the US -Mexico Border indicating functional connectivity (Buchalski et al. 2015). However, as traffic levels continue to increase connectivity will be lost. The most frequent reports of sheep being killed while attempting to cross roads are on Highways 74 and 78, Interstate 8, and County Roads S22 and S3. Other concerns that may hinder recovery efforts are: disease, the loss of natural water sources, reduction and fragmentation of sheep habitat, habitat modification due to invasive nonnative plants, sheep use of urban areas, and human disturbance of essential sheep habitat especially around the urban centers. Yet, even in more remote regions renewable energy projects, completion of the US -Mexico border fence, mining, and human activities (border enforcement and off -road vehicles) may alter, discourage, or restrict sheep movement and habitat use of important resources. Hopefully, continued efforts by CDFW to monitor sheep health, habitat use, and movements throughout the range will provide federal, state, and local governmental agencies and city planners information to make land and public use decisions that allow for the health and long-term survival of peninsular bighorn sheep. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 2 261 BACKGROUND This annual report highlights capture and radio - collaring, radio -collar monitoring, disease surveillance, cause specific mortality investigation, and Iamb survival monitoring undertaken by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) of bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Mountain Ranges of southern California from 1 January 2015 through 31 December 2015. The Peninsular Mountain Ranges contain 9 designated bighorn sheep recovery regions occupying portions of western Riverside, western Imperial and eastern San Diego Counties (Map 1). The 9 recovery regions are: 1) San Jacinto Mountains (SJM); 2) Northern Santa Rosa Mountains (NSRM); 3) Central Santa Rosa Mountains (CSRM); 4) Southern Santa Rosa Mountains (SSRM); 5) Coyote Canyon (CoQ 6) Northern San Ysidro Mountains (NSYM); 7) Southern San Ysidro Mountains (SSYM); 8) Vallecito Mountains (VM); and 9) Carrizo Canyon (CC). A Cessna 185 fixed -wing aircraft was used to conduct aerial telemetry monitoring at least once a month in all 9 recovery regions. Telemetry flights, however, were not conducted for the first 3 months of 2015 following the retirement of CDFW's southern California Air Services pilot in December 2014. Telemetry flights were recommenced in April 2015 when the vacant pilot position was filled. Flights were used to monitor radio -collared sheep status (alive/dead), obtain location estimates, and download GPS location data. Map 1 Peninsular Bighorn Sheep ORecovery Regions 3,208 km2 1— San Jacinto Mountains-168 km2 2 — N. Santa Rosa Mountains —194 km2 1 -- 3— C. Santa Rosa Mountains —257 km2 4 — S. Santa Rosa Mountains — 562 km2 5 — Coyote Canyon — 250 km2 6 — N. San Ysidro Mountains —86 km2 7 — S. San Ysidro Mountains— 117 km2 2 8 — Va Ilecito Mountains — 708 km2 1 9 — Carrizo Canyon — 866 km2 Riverside 74 USFWS Critical Habitat jf 3 Anza-Borrego Desert State Park City Centers _ Wind Farm Infrastructure County Boundary 5 4 6 86 San Diego 7 Imperial ;r� 78 8 9 �d United States Mexico ` — Kilometers 0 5 10 20 30 40 CDFW conducted ground telemetry monitoring of radio -collared sheep twice a month in all recovery regions except for the SJM and NSRM which were monitored by the Bighorn Institute (BI). Satellite -collared sheep in the SJM, CSRM, SSRM, and VM were monitored every 2 to 5 days with the Iridium Satellite Network that delivers messages and location data via email. Ground monitoring efforts were focused on: 1) mortality investigations; 2) observations of sheep composition, health, and status; and 3) spatial and temporal movements of collared sheep. CAPTURE AND RADIO -COLLARING Capture activities were carried out by CDFW between 27 October and 18 November 2015 on State and Federal Lands throughout the Peninsular Ranges within eastern San Diego, western Imperial and western Riverside counties. Capture of all bighorn sheep was carried out by Leading Edge Aviation under contract with CDFW. Base camp processing of bighorn sheep was carried out by CDFW. Field processing of some bighorn sheep was undertaken by the Leading Edge capture crew. Recovery regions where captures occurred included the SJM, NSRM, CSRM, SSRM, CoC, NSYM, SSYM, and VM (Map 2). Funding for the 2015 Peninsular Ranges bighorn sheep capture was provided by CDFW Big Game Fund, USFWS PR Grant (G1598026), and U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Patrol. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 3 262 Map 2 Peninsular Bighorn Sheep $ 1 Recovery Regions 1 -8 ti.rl 4 — L 2012 Capture Locations • 2013 Capture LocaEons `'.--� ■� _ '°�� ■ 2014 Capture Lacat3ons z ■ 2015 Capture Locations —ter' The project objective was to capture and fit Very High Frequency (VHF), Global Positioning System (GPS) store -on- board, and Iridium Satellite radio -collars to a subset of adult ewes (females) and rams (males) to: 1) maintain collars on approximately 25-30% of the ewe population for mark- resight population estimation survey; 2) better define the temporal and spatial movement patterns of bighorn sheep crossing between targeted recovery regions; 3) better define sheep distribution and ewe group organization in the targeted recover regions; and 4) determine causes of mortality. During 11 days of capture a total of 91 bighorn sheep were captured and fitted with radio -collars (84 ewes & 7 rams). All radio -collared bighorn sheep were fitted with unique combinations of colored radio -collars and ear tags to facilitate individual identification. Of the 84 ewes captured, 28 were deployed with GPS collars, 15 with satellite collars, and 41 with VHF collars. Five rams were fitted with GPS collars and 2 with VHF collars. CDFW conducted regular ground and fixed -wing aerial monitoring of all newly radio -collared bighorn sheep for 1 month post -capture with no mortalities detected. All sheep were captured using a net -gun fired from a helicopter. Thirty-five sheep were radio -collared in the field and 56 sheep were transported to a base camp for health examinations and radio -collaring. All bighorn sheep arrived in base camp in good condition and appeared normal with respect to disease or injuries with the exception of 1 ram in the VM that had a slight nasal discharge and 1 ram and 1 ewe in the SSRM that had existing eye injuries. Twenty-six percent of the captured sheep showed signs of chronic sinusitis based on horn necrosis. At base camp each bighorn sheep was weighed, examined for injuries, body measurements taken, blood, fecal, and nasal swabs collected for disease testing, and radio -collars attached. The average age of ewes captured was 6.1 years with a range from 1.5 to 11.5 years (n = 50). The average age of rams captured was 6.3 years with a range of 3.5 to 8.5 years (n = 6). RADIO -COLLAR STATUS As recommended in the recovery plan for peninsular bighorn sheep (USFWS 2000), CDFW maintains, to the extent possible, active radio -collars on approximately 25-30% of all ewes in each recovery region. Maintaining at least 25% radio -collared (marked) ewes is important for generating reliable mark-resight population estimates based on helicopter surveys. CDFW derives rangewide bighorn sheep population estimates by conducting helicopter surveys in the fall of even numbered years and captures to fit needed radio -collars on sheep during the fall of odd numbered years; however, rangewide helicopter surveys were not conducted in 2012 and 2014 due to lack of a CDFW helicopter contract. A contract has since been executed and a rangewide helicopter survey is planned for fall 2016. Prior to the 2015 capture, only 3 of 9 recovery regions had approximately 25% radio -collared ewes. The objective of the fall 2015 capture was to fill the radio -collared gaps that existed to assure there would be 25% - 30% radio -collared ewes for the 2016 survey. The objective was met in all recovery regions with the exception of the NSRM and CC recovery regions (Table 1). A field - based capture is tentatively planned for fall 2016 to fill the remaining radio -collared gaps prior to the rangewide helicopter population survey. At the beginning of the 2015 reporting period, the 9 recovery regions contained a total of 94 (89 ewes & 5 rams) active radio -collars. During the fall capture an additional 91 (84 ewes & 7 rams) active radio -collars were deployed in all California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 4 263 recovery regions with the exception of the CC recovery region. Radio -collars were lost through mortality in the NSRM, CSRM, CoC, SSYM, VM, and CC recovery regions while 1 radio -collar became non-functional in the CSRM. At the end of 2015 there were a total of 171 (161 ewes & 10 rams) active radio -collars (Table 1). Table 1. Distribution and numbers of active radio -collared female (F) and male (M) bighorn sheep within the 9 recovery regions at the beginning and end of 2015. The recovery regions are: SJM = San Jacinto Mountains, NSRM = Northern Santa Rosa Mountains, CSRM = Central Santa Rosa Mountains, SSRM = Southern Santa Rosa Mountains, CoC = Coyote Canyon, NSYM = Northern San Ysidro Mountains, SSYM = Southern San Ysidro Mountains, VM = Vallecito Mountains, and CC = Carrizo Canyon. The estimated percentage of females radio -collared (% F Collared) at the end of 2015 is based on the ewe abundance estimates from the most recent range -wide helicopter survey in 2010. Category SJM F M NSRM F M CSRM F M SSRM F M CoC F M NSYM F M SSYM F M VM F M CC F M Subtotal F M Grand Total 1 /1 /2015 6 0 5 0 12 0 1 0 6 0 10 0 1 0 20 0 28 5 89 5 94 additions 5 2 6 12 22 2 8 3 14 14 3 84 7 91 mortalities 1 1 2 1 2 3 2 10 2 12 censored 2 2 2 12/31/2015 11 2 10 0 21 0 23 2 12 0 13 0 14 0 32 3 25 3 161 10 171 % F Collared 42% 23% 30% 27% 26% 33% 39% 40% 18% 29% POPULATION SIZE AND ESTIMATION The most recent rangewide estimate of 955 bighorn sheep was conducted by CDFW in 2010 and the population is considered to be stable to increasing (Table 2). A detailed review of population estimates, ewe abundance, and lamb:ewe ratios from 1993 to 2010 can be found in the CDFW 2012 Annual Report (https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Conservation/Mam mals/Bighorn-Sheep/Desert/Peninsular). A rangewide population survey is planned for fall of 2016. RESPIRATORY DISEASE Table 2. Peninsular bighorn sheep population estimates for each recovery region for years 2006, 2008 and 2010 based on CDFW helicopter surveys. Map of recovery regions depicts the adjusted population estimate by including Bighorn Institute's 2014 estimates for the San Jacinto and Northern Santa Rosa Mountains. Approximately 66% of the area within the recovery regions lies within ABDSP; and approximately 600 of the estimated 961 bighorn sheep are within the Park. Recovery Regions 2006 Year 2008 2010 SJM 21 26 16 NSRM 49 77 90 CSRM 163 122 133 SSRM 179 155 149 CDC 42 52 66 NSYM 79 82 72 SSYM 38 53 55 VM 77 123 142 CC 145 186 232 Total 793 876 955 Disease epizootics (analogous to disease epidemics in humans) are a major limiting factor in restoring large, healthy, wild sheep populations throughout western North America (Singer et al. 2000). Likewise, disease epizootics were the major contributing factor for declines in peninsular bighorn sheep populations from the 1970s to the mid-1990s (Fredrickson and Mills 2010). Clinical signs of pneumonia (coughing, nasal discharge, droopy ears, lethargy, and weight loss) were first noted in the 1970s in the NSRM and within some areas of Anza-Borrego Desert state park (USFWS 2000). Consequently, a study conducted by the Bighorn Institute from Peninsular Recovery Regions 40 Total Population Estimate 961 SJM* Area = 3208 km2 772 NSRM* 133 CSRM 149 Coc SSRM 66 72 NSYM 36 ssYM VM Anza-Borrego 233 2 Desert State Park CC 600 Area =2,127 km' .l 0 5 10 20 30 40 161ane4e±5 1981 to 1984 concluded that pneumonia was the major cause of high Iamb mortality within the NSRM (DeForge and Scott 1982). Pneumonia -induced mortality in Iambs continues to be a problem in many recovery regions throughout the Peninsular Ranges (Colby and Botta 2012). CDFW and collaborators have actively been investigating the causative pathogen or pathogens and the possible factors that drive the timing, duration, and severity of respiratory disease outbreaks within the Peninsular Ranges. The original pathogens causing respiratory diseases in wild sheep were most likely introduced by domestic sheep (via nose -to -nose contact) as indicated by both empirical and laboratory studies (Lawrence et al. 2010, and Wehausen et al. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 5 264 2011). Initially, a pneumonia epizootic typically causes an all -age die -off (adults and Iambs) followed by up to 12 years of either sporadic or persistent high rates of pneumonia in Iambs (Cassirer and Sinclair 2007, Cassirer et al. 2013). There have likely been multiple independent pathogens responsible for pneumonia epizootics at different times and locations within bighorn sheep habitat including bovine respiratory syncytial virus, parainfluenza-3 virus, and Pasteurella and Mannheimia spp. (Rudolph et al. 2007, and Besser et al. 2008). Recently, the bacterium Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae (hereafter referred to as M.ovi) has been identified as the primary pathogen associated with pneumonia in wild sheep populations throughout the western United States (Besser et al. 2008, and Besser et al. 2012). In California, between 2013 and 2015, M.ovi was the primary pathogen detected in 11 of 15 cases (73%) of bronchopneumonia in bighorn sheep submitted for post-mortem testing at California Animal Health & Food Safety Laboratory System (CAHFS). In the Peninsular Ranges, results from blood samples collected from wild sheep captured from 1999 to 2015 found that approximately 51% of sheep in each recovery region tested positive for the presence of M.ovi (Testing performed by Washington Animal Disease Diagnostic Laboratory at Washington State University). In the Peninsular Ranges, pneumonia -induced mortality in Iambs typically peaks when Iambs are between 1 and 3 months of age at a time when ewes and Iambs are concentrated within nursery groups. A ewe carrying the pathogen can transmit the infection to her Iamb —the Iamb can then transmit the pathogen to other Iambs within the nursery group. Varying rates (asynchronous) of Iamb mortality among ewe groups and years is likely due to differences in the number of infected and pathogen shedding ewes, the virulence and timing of pathogen introduction, and the exposure (contact) rates (Cassirer et al. 2013, and Plowright et al. 2013). Environmental factors may also contribute to asynchronous rates of pneumonia -induced mortality in Iambs. In the Peninsular Ranges, the density of ewes and Iambs as well as the duration within nursery grounds is dependent on the quality and quantity of vegetation available (J. Colby, CDFW unpubl. data). During drought years, when forage conditions are poor, there is a low density of ewes and Iambs for a short duration within nursery grounds which may decrease both the probability of the correct timing of pathogen introduction and the exposure rates to Iambs. Reciprocally, during wet years, when forage conditions are good, there is a high density of ewes and Iambs for a longer duration within nursery grounds which may increase both the probability of the correct timing of pathogen introduction and exposure rates to Iambs. Consistent, high quality forage conditions, such as those provided by golf courses, allow large numbers of ewes and Iambs to concentrate within a very small area for prolonged periods of time and thus may facilitate the spread of disease to a larger percentage of the Iambs within the nursery group. A Iamb's health status prior to infection may influence the probability of surviving a bout of pneumonia. In the NSYM, Iambs observed with diarrhea and weight loss prior to exhibiting signs of pneumonia were less likely to survive than Iambs without diarrhea and weight loss (J. Colby, CDFW unpubl. data). The cause of chronic diarrhea is not known; however, Iambs and ewes in NSYM readily consume Sahara mustard (Brassica tournefortii), a non-native herbaceous annual containing glucosinolates that can be toxic to wildlife (Horn and Vaughan 1983). Diarrhea has also been observed in sick Iambs at the golf courses in La Quinta. Sulfate -based fertilizer application to golf course grasses can result in induced copper deficiencies in sheep. Copper deficiencies in sheep can result in diarrhea, weight loss, ataxia (loss of coordination), and decreased resistance to diseases (Scott 2007). Low copper levels have been documented in Iambs that have died of pneumonia at the golf courses in La Quinta (refer to section on Lamb Survival and Recruitment). Outbreaks of infectious disease in wild sheep are difficult if not impossible to manage. Tools used in domestic livestock such as treatment and vaccination are impractical and generally ineffective when applied to wild populations. Geographic separation of domestic sheep and goats from bighorn habitat is the only sure method to reduce the risk of disease outbreaks (Dr. Ben Gonzales, CDFW Senior Wildlife Veterinarian pers. comm.) CAUSE -SPECIFIC MORTALITY AND SURVIVAL Because population viability is most sensitive to changes in ewe survival (Ruben et al. 2002), it is important to document survival and mortality statistics within the Peninsular Ranges in order to make cogent management decisions. In 2015, there were 13 (11 ewes and 2 rams) radio -collared sheep mortalities (Table 3). Mortalities by recovery region were: NSRM = 1 ewe; CSRM = 1 ewe; CoC = 2 ewes, SSYM = 1 ewe; VM = 2 ewes; and CC = 4 ewes & 2 rams. From 1992-2015, California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 6 265 on average, 12% of all active radio -collared sheep died each year. During this period of time, lion predation and probable lion predation combined accounted for 7% of the mortalities. In 2015, only 7% of all active radio -collared sheep died. Of this percentage 3.2% were attributed to predation, probable predation, or possible predation combined, 2.2% the cause was unknown, and 1.6% was attributed to nonpredation. Deaths were categorized as nonpredation when the exact cause Of death was Table 3. Cause of death for 13 radio -collared bighorn sheep by recovery region and ewe group unknown but predation could be ruled out within the Peninsular Ranges of Southern California from January 1 to December 31, 2015. Carrizo as a possible cause. The average age Of = Carrizo ewe group, IKP = In-Ko-Pah ewe group, and TB = Tierra Blanca ewe group all within the radio -collared ewes in 2015 was 7.1 years Carrizo Canyon Recovery Region. with a range between 1.5 and 19 years (n — Region(Ewe Group) sheep ID Sex Age Month cause 173). In comparison, the average age of NSRM BI F 12 May Possible Lion Predation CSRM 9000 F 15 March Unknown radio -collared ewes that died was 12.0 Coc 214 F 8 January Unknown years with a range between 8 and 16 years CoC 213 F 16 November Nonpredation (n = 11). The average age of ewe deaths ssyM 208 F 15 January Probable Lion Predation attributed to predation combined was 12.3 Vallecito 210 F 12 February Possible Lion Predation years with a range between 10 and 15 vallecito 325 F 9 May Nonpredation years (n = 4). Age related disease and/or Carrizo 191* F 13 May Nonpredation poor health were noted in 3 of the 4 ewe Carrizo 307 F 8 September Unknown deaths attributed to predation. Ewes that Carrizo 228 F 14 December Unknown Carrizo (IKP) 279 F 10 February Probable Lion Predation died of nonpredation causes were slightly Carrizo (IKP) 280 M 8 April Probable Lion Predation older with an average age of 12.7 years and Carrizo (TB) 332 M 8 November Lion Predation a range between 9 and 16 years (n = 3). In *Nonfunctioning collar since 2012-Ewe was found byhiker all deaths attributed to nonpredation, signs of long-term disease such as chronic sinusitis, low amount of body fat, and/or tooth infections were found during mortality investigations. The average age of sheep deaths categorized as unknown was 11.3 years with a range of 8 to 15 years (n = 4). Age related disease and/ or poor health were noted in 3 of 4 ewe deaths categorized as unknown. Two male radio -collared sheep died due to predation and possible predation. Both 8 year -old rams resided in the CC recovery region and appeared healthy at time of death. However, inferences concerning causes of death and death rates among the ram population cannot be made due to the small number radio -collared rangewide. Table 4. Annual Kaplan-Meir survival rates (modified to allow for staggered entry of new animals) for Within the Peninsular Ranges, ewe female bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges of Southern California. Data were collected by CDFW survival rates can vary by recovery in regions 5 through 9 from 1994 to 2015 and in regions 1 through 3 from 2011 to 2015. In regions 5 — region, year and month. 9: red = lowest survival rate for each region, blue = survival rates below 70%. Additionally the reliability Of Year 1-SJM 2-NSRM 3-CSRM 4-SSRM 5-CoC 6-NSYM 7-SSYM 8-VM 9-CC 1994 63% 77% 75% 63% 82% 1995 60% 100% 67% 75% 71% 1996 67% 80% 100% 100% 60% 1997 100% 100% 100% 33% 100% 1998 90% 88% 60% 88% 100% 1999 75% 86% 50% 80% 100% 2000 89% 71% 100% 91% 100% 2001 88% 60% 100% 92% 100% 2002 78% 75% 83% 91% 91% 2003 100% 100% 100% 100% 70% 2004 90% 75% 92% 86% 100% 2005 100% 100% 82% 90% 75% 2006 56% 90% 82% 92% 100% 2007 80% 89% 67% 100% 100% 2008 90% 91% 75% 92% 92% 2009 89% 80% 67% 100% 91% 2010 93% 100% 75% 100% 92% 2011 100% 100% 90% 100% 85% 83% 100% 100% 2012 100% 100% 89% 86% 73% 90% 100% 100% 2013 100% 100% 88% 75% 100% 67% 100% 67% 2014 100% 83% 83% 100% 100% 100% 100% 2015 100% 80% 92% 67% 100% 90% 89% average 100% 93% 88% 83% 87% 81% 89% 90% survival rates is influenced by the percentage of radio -collared sheep within each recovery region at any given point in time. In regions 5 through 9, survival statistics have been collected since 1994 to present and thus serve as a good index of ewe survival within these regions. Survival statistics for regions 1 — 3 were added in 2011 after CDFW South Coast Region assumed responsibility for rangewide monitoring. Presently, survival rates are not available for region 4; however, radio -collars were deployed in 2015 and thus survival data for this region will be available starting in 2016. In 2015, average rangewide survival of California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 7 266 radio -collared ewes was 87%: survival was highest in SJM (100%) and NSYM (100%) and lowest in CoC (67%: Table 4). 2015 survival statistics were not available in the SSRM and SSYM due to lack of radio -collared animals. In regions 5 through 9 from 1993 to 2015, the average survival rate from highest to lowest was CC (90%), followed by VM (89%), NSYM (87%), CoC (83%), and SSYM (81%). Over the past 5 years (2011 — 2015), rangewide average survival of radio - collared ewes from highest to lowest was SJM (100%), followed by VM (98%), NSRM (93%), NSYM (91%), CC (91%), CSRM (88%), CoC (86%), and SSYM (80%). In the SSYM, data were not collected in 2014 and 2015, but the overall low survival rate and trend is of concern within this recovery region. The trend in the CSRM is also of concern, however, up until 2015 there may not have been enough radio -collared ewes to accurately represent the greater CSRM population. Also of concern are low survival rates within CoC in 3 of the past 5 years. Documentation and mortality investigations of non -collared sheep deaths and/or injuries rely on the willingness and ability of the general public and government agencies to contact either CDFW or BI. Because these mortalities are found by chance alone, they are not necessarily representative of the overall sheep population. In 2015, there were 12 non - collared sheep deaths reported with the majority due to urban related causes (3 ewes, 5 rams, and 4 Iambs). Two rams and 1 ewe were killed by vehicles on Highway 74 located between the NSRM and CSRM recovery regions (Map 13). In the CSRM, a young ram was killed on Jefferson Avenue in La Quinta: a distance of almost % of a mile from the nearest mountains (Figure 1). One ram and 1 ewe were killed by vehicles on the east -bound lanes of Interstate 8 in the CC recovery region (Map 15). In September, a yearling Figure 1. A young ram was struck and killed (red X) by a vehicle while crossing Jefferson Street in ram was killed by a lion along coyote La Quinta California on 6/13/2015. Creek in CoC and in December a pregnant ewe was killed by a lion in Moonlight Canyon within the Tierra Blanca Mountains in the CC recovery region. Details of Iamb mortalities are reported in the Lamb Survival and Recruitment section below. LAMB SURVIVAL AND RECRUITMENT CDFW has monitored Iamb survival (survival to 3 months) and recruitment (survival to 1 year = yearlings) in the CoC, NSYM and SSYM recovery regions since 2008, and in the In-Ko-Pah (IKP) ewe group (within the CC recovery region) since 2010. Details and descriptive statistics concerning Iamb production, timing of parturition, Iamb survival to 3 months, onset of Iamb sickness, and timing of Iamb deaths can be found in the CDFW 2012 Annual Report. In 2015, Iamb survival and recruitment monitoring in the CSRM was initiated. Lamb:ewe ratios (number of Iambs per 100 ewes) and yearling:ewe ratios (number of yearlings per 100 ewes), based on group observations, are used as indices of Iamb survival and recruitment. Clinical signs of Iamb pneumonia have been documented in all 5 recovery regions; however, rates of Iamb survival and recruitment have varied by ewe group, season, and year (Table 5). For the past 8 years, the average recruitment ratio has been very low (18%) in both CoC and NSYM. Typically, Iamb survival levels below 30% indicate the presence of Iamb respiratory disease within a ewe group. Furthermore, persistently low recruitment levels due to reoccurring pneumonia epizootics in Iambs may pose a significant obstacle in population recovery (Cassirer and Sinclair 2007). California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 8 267 Table 5. Index of Iamb survival to 3-months-old (Survival) and recruitment of Iambs to yearlings (Recruited) from 2008 — 2015 in CoC, NSYM, SSYM, IKP ewe group in CC, Urban ewe group in CSRM and Wild ewe group in CSRM. Three-month Iamb survival was calculated from lamb:ewe ratios from group observations obtained from May -June of the year Iambs were born and matched with yearling:ewe ratios (recruited) from January - June of the following year. For example in 2015 in NSYM, 19% of Iambs survived to 3-months-old (Survival), and 11% survived to yearlings (Recruited) in 2016. a Data for recruitment has not yet been calculated for CoC and SSYM. Year CoC Survival Recruited NSYM Survival Recruited SSYM Survival Recruited IKP-CC Survival Recruited Urban CSRM Survival Recruited Wild CSRM Survival Recruited 2008 66% 21% 43% 21% 64% 29% 2009 51% 31% 30% 24% 41% 18% 2010 37% 24% 14% 19% 61% 28% 79% 39% 2011 56% 4% 21% 3% 58% 17% 63% 20% 2012 36% 7% 13% 13% 63% 38% 70% 45% 2013 26% 7% 7% 18% 93% 51% 26% 2014 25% 22% 38% 34% * 27% 10% 8% * 35% * 38% 2015 21% a 19% 11% 47% a 86% 35% 53% 11% 66% 36% Average 40% 18% 23% 18% 61% 25% 60% 29% 53% 23% 66% 36% Central Santa Rosa Mountains: Health monitoring of Iambs in this tx recovery region commenced in 2015 after sheep were radio -collared in October 2014. Presently, in the CSRM 4 ewe groups have been ., identified; 3 of these ewe groups have not been documented .+ foraging at golf courses surrounding the city of La Quinta (hereafter referred to as "wild sheep") while the fourth ewe group regularly - forages at golf courses (hereafter referred to as "urban sheep").� Yearling:ewe ratios obtained in 2015 indicated a high rate of Iamb recruitment from 2014 for both urban and wild sheep groups in the _ CSRM (Table 5). In 2015, the peak of parturition occurred in + February. Average Iamb survival to 3 months was high in both urban - (53%) and wild sheep (66%) groups; however, Iamb recruitment -' within the urban group dropped precipitously post-3-months with ' only 11% of the Iambs born in 2015 surviving their first year compared to 36% in the wild group (Table 5). Furthermore, only 1 of the 4 Iambs belonging to urban radio -collared ewes survived through 2015. In April, 1 Iamb was observed with mild symptoms of Photo bv J. Colbv respiratory disease within the wild sheep group. In the urban group, Photo 1. Yearling ewe at SilverRock golf course with diarrhea. a few Iambs and several yearlings and ewes, including pregnant collared ewe 349, were observed with diarrhea at SilverRock golf course (Photo 1). Also in April, a sick Iamb found at a residence in PGA West golf community was removed by Riverside County Animal Control and taken to their facility. Unfortunately, because wild sheep are extremely susceptible to diseases carried by domestic animals, this Iamb could not be treated and returned to its mother. The Iamb was taken to the Living Desert Museum and diagnosed and treated for bronchopneumonia: lab results identified the bacterium M.ovi as the likely causative agent. By May, all of the Iambs at the golf course, including those belonging to four collared ewes were showing mild to severe symptoms of respiratory disease. Mild symptoms of respiratory disease are coughing and nasal discharge but with good body weight and no droopy ears whereas severe symptoms include nasal discharge, droopy ears, lethargy, and weight loss (Photo 2). Also in May, CDFW personnel removed a moribund Iamb from the SilverRock Golf Course. The 3-month-old male Iamb was taken to the California Animal Health and Food Safety Lab (CAHFS) in San Bernardino where it was humanely euthanized. Necropsy and test results indicated that the Iamb had bronchopneumonia with the main bacterial infectious agent identified as M.ovi. Additionally, lab results showed the Iamb had intestinal coccidiosis, low levels of hepatic copper, and high levels of zinc all of which contributed to a poor immune status and predisposed the Iamb to bacterial California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 9 268 Photo 2. The Iamb on the left had pneumonia — droopy ears, nasal discharge, extremely thin, poor coat condition, and lethargic. Typically, when Iambs get this sick they no longer cough (mild symptoms are nasal discharge and cough but with no droopy ears and good body weight). In comparison, the Iamb in photo B is healthy — head held high, ears up, good body weight (rounded hindquarters), and good coat condition. infections. In August, a male Iamb was found dead in the Coachella Canal terminus at Lake Cahuilla by Coachella Valley Water District personnel. The Iamb was retrieved by CDFW personnel and taken to CAHFS for postmortem examination. The cause of death could not be determined due to severe postmortem decomposition but gross and microscopic changes were suggestive of drowning as the possible cause of death. Gross examination of the lungs did not indicate this Iamb had pneumonia. Toxicology results indicated a low liver copper concentration which can contribute to ill thrift, decreased resistance to other diseases, diarrhea, ataxia (loss of coordination) and at extremely low levels, death may occur. In 2015, the spread of disease among urban Iambs was most likely facilitated by ewes and their Iambs concentrated at the golf courses. Furthermore, sick Iambs are more vulnerable to predation but because urban Iambs have lost their natural wariness they may be at higher risk of predation compared to wild Iambs. Coyote Canyon: The 2015 Iamb survival ratio of 21% indicated respiratory disease was once again an issue within this recovery region (recruitment data have yet to be assessed: Table 5). In June, a male Iamb was killed by a bobcat near Coyote Creek. Gross necropsy findings indicated the Iamb may have been suffering from respiratory disease prior to being killed. Sick Iambs will often spend more time near a water source and therefore are more vulnerable to predation. Northern San Ysidro Mountains: In 2014, Iamb survival (38%) and recruitment (34%) was much higher than the previous 6 years (Table 5). Unfortunately, in 2015, Iamb survival (19%) and recruitment (11%) were again extremely low. The peak of parturition for this ewe group has shifted from February to January; and in late January 2015, the first symptoms of disease were observed in a 2-week-old Iamb with diarrhea and a severe cough. The Iambs of 2 radio -collared ewes were also observed with diarrhea, cough, and nasal discharge. Most symptoms of disease were first observed when Iambs were between 3 and 7 weeks of age. Of the 20 radio -collared ewes (7 were non-functioning collared ewes) monitored in 2015, 12 ewes (60%) lost their Iambs to pneumonia, 2 Iambs survived (10%) but had displayed mild symptoms of respiratory disease, 2 ewes did not have Iambs (a 16-year-old ewe and a 2 year -old -ewe), and the pregnancy status of 4 ewes was unknown. While most symptoms of respiratory disease were seen in Iambs, 5 radio -collared ewes and 3 non - collared sheep also showed mild symptoms of respiratory disease. For example, in February, collared ewe 315 was observed with nasal discharge and another non -collared adult ewe was seen coughing (both were in good body condition). In May, a 2-year-old ram was observed with a dry-hacky cough and another 2-year-old ewe was in poor body condition. In early July, collared ewe 311 was observed coughing several times. In August collared ewes 185, 308, and 316 were observed coughing. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 10 269 Southern San Ysidro Mountains: There were no radio -collared ewes present in this recovery region until November 2015; therefore, most observations of Iambs were opportunistic with little detailed information. Two Iambs were seen with symptoms of respiratory disease but both Iambs had good body weight and were over 3 months old. During the annual ABDSP 4th of July waterhole count only 8 ewes and 8 rams were counted with no Iambs observed during the 3 day count. Based on this information, a CDFW field biologist and volunteer spent 3 days in August near water sources and obtained a lamb:ewe ratio of 47% and a yearling:ewe ratio of 22%. However, average recruitment since 2008 has been below 30% except in 2012 (Table 5). Low Iamb recruitment levels in conjunction with a low average annual ewe survival rate (81%: Table 4) may indicate this is a declining recovery region. Hopefully, with the recent addition of radio - collared ewes within the SSYM we will be able to monitor this recovery region more thoroughly in the future. Carrizo Canyon: There are 4 ewe groups within this recovery region: Tierra Blanca, Carrizo, In-Ko-Pah (IKP), and Jacumba. While group observations were obtained in all 4 ewe groups, Iamb survival and recruitment ratios are only reported for the IKP ewe group which has been consistently monitored since 2010. In the past 6 years, average Iamb survival (60%) and recruitment (29%) has been good (Table 5). Prior to 2014, each year a few Iambs were observed with symptoms of respiratory disease but typically signs were not severe. Starting in 2014 there was an increase in symptoms of severe pneumonia with a subsequent drop in Iamb survival (10%) and recruitment (8%). In 2015, Iamb survival (86%) and recruitment (35%) ratios rebounded tremendously. Two sets of twins were confirmed within the IKP ewe group in 2015: one set belonged to a non -collared ewe and the other set belonged to collared ewe 233 (Photo 3). Ewe 233 was observed on multiple occasions nursing 2 female Iambs at the same time; furthermore, her twins �T survived through weaning. Of the 9 marked ewes that had Iambs in IKP in 2015, only 1 Iamb did not survive through the first 4 months. However, if the IKP ewe group is to follow the same pattern seen in other ewe groups where respiratory disease has been introduced, the general pattern will be for decreasing or chronically low Iamb survival and recruitment interspersed occasionally with high recruitment levels. The Indication thus far at the writing of this report is for a poor year of Iamb survival in 2016. Respiratory disease is also impacting Iambs within the Carrizo ewe group. In June, a dead Iamb was found by a hiker along the railroad tracks in Carrizo Canyon. A CDFW biologist Photo by J. Young performed a field necropsy: gross findings were indicative of bronchopneumonia and lab results identified M.ovi as the likely causative Photo 3. Ewe 233 with two female twins pathogen. In the Tierra Blanca ewe group, Iamb survival through the summer nursing —Spring 2015. appeared to be high. In August, 13 Iambs and 20 ewes were consistently seen in the Agua Caliente County Park campground. While all Iambs were active and had good body weight, a few Iambs exhibited mild symptoms of respiratory disease. Twins were also confirmed in this ewe group for a total of 3 sets of twins documented in the CC recovery region for 2015. DISTRIBUTION AND MOVEMENT Presently, remote download and Satellite GPS collars are deployed in the highest numbers with the best representative distribution within each recovery region than at any other time. Population structure and abundance rangewide was last described in 1998 (Rubin et al. 1998); however, the study relied on direct observations for documenting ewe group structure and movement patterns rather than detailed GPS location data. In 2017, CDFW will update and fully describe population structure, movement, and abundance based on current GPS data and the abundance estimate that will be obtained during the fall 2016 rangewide helicopter population survey. Past CDFW annual reports have described habitat use, distribution, and movement patterns in CoC, NSYM, SSYM (2012 Annual Report), and CC recovery regions (2014 Annual Report). This report will describe preliminary results on ewe group structure and movement patterns obtained from location data collected from November 2014 through 2015 in the CSRM and VM recovery regions. We will also briefly describe preliminary location data collected from satellite collars deployed on females within the SJM and SSRM recovery regions. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 11 270 Map 3 Chino Canyon TTachevah Canyon �Fa _k ,a Tahquitz Creek V e • � 0 4 • ,'a Andreas Canyon a Murray Canyon West Fork Palm Canyon +.1. + 11 41 s - a a kilc nsrG. San Jacinto Mountains: The SJM recovery region is approximately 168 square kilometers (km2) with a density of approximately 0.24 sheep per kmZ (based on 2010 abundance estimate). In November 2015, satellite collars were deployed on 5 ewes and GPS collars were deployed on 2 rams; however, GPS data on the rams is "store -on -board" and has not yet been obtained. Thus far, location data from November 2015 to May 2016 show a home range use of approximately 32 kmZ with core use centered on the south side of Chino Canyon and within Tahquitz Creek Canyon (Map 3). Two collared ewes spent time south of Tahquitz: Ewe 431 spent November and December between Tahquitz and Murray Canyons while ewe 432 spent the month of January south of the West fork of Palm Canyon. Central Santa Rosa Mountains: The CSRM recovery region is approximately 257 kmZ with a density of approximately 0.52 sheep per kmZ (based on 2010 abundance estimate). Location data reported extends from November 2014 to March 2016 and represents the combined locations of 3 satellite and 10 GPS-collared ewes. Data have not yet been collected on 4 ewes captured in the southern region of CSRM and thus the data reported here do not fully represent all radio -collar movements. To date, data from GPS-collared ewes have identified 4 ewe groups within the CSRM as defined by habitat use patterns (Map 4). Three ewe groups do not use any artificial water and forage Map 4 La Quipta CSRM r Tradrio Ewe Groups IverRock West Home Range 57 km2 La Qulnta Deep canyon Cove - Urban Home Range 16 kmz PGA West South A Home Range 112 km2 South R Home Range 115 km2 sear Creek .,r The Quarry Golf Courses dN �, � Natural Water Sources .r —Highways 13 Devil Canyon ik'�4 - ? j Guadalupe Creek Toro Canyon � Alta Agua Canyon _ Martinez Canyon Sheep Canyon Ole 4, ,u t rm yJ+A�r r - ��._ n iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiKlorant— resources while the fourth ewe group spends the majority of their time either within or near the golf course communities in La Quinta. We define a ewe group as a group of ewes that share the same nursery grounds and the same summer water sources. However, within each ewe group there is some sub -structuring, or subset of ewes, that spend the majority of the year with their adopted ewe group and a small portion of the year with their natal ewe group. We define these individuals or subgroups of ewes as "bridge ewes" since they often bridge the social and physical discontinuities or gaps between ewe groups within a region or across regions. While the seasonal movement patterns of these ewes are atypical, they most likely play an important role in gene flow among populations but may contribute to the spread of disease as well. The home range used by the "West" ewe group encompasses approximately 57 kmZ and extends 12 km from east to west and 7 km from north to south (Map 5). The western boundary abuts highway 74 which acts as a barrier to free sheep movement. The eastern boundary ends just west California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 12 271 of The Quarry Golf community in La Quinta. The northern boundary surrounds Indio Mountain and the southern boundary ends around Guadalupe Creek. The most heavily used core area is in the lower portion of Deep Canyon and ` Guadalupe Creek -.rf!__ �J C'• 1 3 -0 rr�� lume7�is Map 6 .` �` T.. Tradition - %r ILI Coy I °teC 4a Quinta Cove n+F' IL( PPk Ar� i tig_ H" Bear Creek Devil Canyon _ Guadalupe Creek SilverRock extends into Coyote Creek which is used as a movement corridor into the eastern portion of their range. Lambing habitat has been documented in the areas surrounding Coyote Creek. Summer activity is not centered on a single water source but, instead, ewes move between water sources in Deep Canyon, Bear Creek, and Guadalupe Creek (Map 6). To date, this ewe group has not used any artificial water sources or habitat within the urban environment. Ewes in the southern portion of the CSRM received radio -collars in November of 2015 and home range definition presented here is preliminary. It is not yet clear whether ewes within this area should be defined as two ewe groups or one ewe group with extensive sub -structuring. The home range used by ewe group "South -A" encompasses 112 km2 and is approximately 19 km in length and 10 km in width (Map 7). The northern end is on the slopes above the La Quinta golf courses and the southern terminus is just south of Sheep Canyon. Ewe group "South-B" encompasses 115 km2 and is approximately 19 km in length and 12 km in width. The northern end starts at Toro Canyon and the southern end is just south of Barton Canyon. The official boundary between the CSRM and SSRM recovery regions passes through Martinez Canyon (Map 7); however, these two ewe groups overlap extensively to the north and south of this artificial boundary in the areas surrounding Toro, Alta Agua, Martinez, and Sheep Canyons. Of note is the "donut -like" hole above Martinez Canyon created by the lack of sheep locations within this area. Toro, Alta Agua and Martinez Canyons all drain into this 6 by 4 km valley and is a good example of how sheep prefer to spend the majority of their time on the steep slopes surrounding this valley rather than venturing into it, where the habitat is less safe relative to predators. The true southern boundary for the South-B ewe group may extend farther south than Barton Canyon. Location data from radio -collared ewe 409 (captured in Toro Canyon) have not yet been obtained but in January her VHF signal was detected in the SSRM around Big Wash. This ewe may serve as a bridge between the South ewe groups and the ewe groups within the SSRM. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 13 272 • 'Map 7 Tradition CSRM La quints SilverRock South Ewe Groups Sou[hASheep Deep Canyon -Sau[h West CX"LThhe B Sheep So uthA H c m e R singe 112 k m2 South B home Range 115 km2 Recovery Reg— 3 & 4 Bear Creek 0 ,arry —Boundary la hottveen Region 384 +`- I. - DevillCanyon c IfC N atural 'Nater Sources CSRM Guadalupe Creek 'alt`�" _ - —Highways "mow -. - - Toro Canyon Alta Ag Canyon - Martinez Canyo rsYtix t ei- by 10 i/ .' ,•,� SSRM {.! Alano Canyon ®ffiw N i-, _ �• Barton Canyon 141ometers i-, ME, uti w `, eye :�' - ;• �` '. } s �a Qulnta ` CoveN. I -yt.. CSRM Urban Ewe Group Shpzp Locations on Golf Courses s:5roup Core Area 2 km2 r �r Group Home. Range 10 km 2 The home range used by the "Urban" ewe group encompasses approximately 16 kM2 and is 3.5 times smaller than the West ewe group home range and 7 times smaller than the South ewe groups home ranges (Map 8). The north boundary is Tradition golf course and the southern boundary is just south of The Quarry golf community. The western boundary is La Quinta Cove and the easternmost boundary is the PGA West golf community. The core use areas are SilverRock and PGA West golf courses and the desert slopes overlooking those courses. The Urban ewe group is the newest group within the CSRM and most likely formed from ewes that splintered off from the West and South ewe groups. Rams have been documented using the golf courses in La Quinta since 2007 but ewes and Iambs did not start using the golf courses regularly until 2012. Ewes and their Iambs quickly became habituated to the urban environment and their movement patterns and behaviors contrast strongly with those of their wild neighbors. There is a misperception that due to drought conditions in sheep habitat the ewes and their Iambs "need" the water sources and green grasses that are supplied by the golf courses. However, there are 3 other ewe groups in the CSRM that are thriving without artificial food and water sources even during drought conditions (Maps 5, 6, & 7). Desert bighorn sheep typically have large home ranges because they must move from one area to the next as the quality and quantity of food sources change throughout the seasons. Wild sheep behavior is driven by the constant need to satisfy their nutritional requirements while staying safe from predators. Steep slopes with good visibility afford the safest habitat from predators but riskier habitat such as riparian areas, alluvial fans, and canyon washes can provide the highest quality forage during some seasons. Wild sheep must constantly balance the risks of predation against benefit of higher quality forage. Ewes with young Iambs will often choose safer habitat over greener habitat or minimize time within risky habitat while remaining vigilant. Sheep that forage within the urban setting have learned to overcome their innate fear of humans, loud noises, vehicles, and flat open areas far from escape terrain. This "casual" behavior that lacks the natural vigilance and wariness that is innate to wild sheep makes urban sheep more vulnerable to predation, as well as other dangers such as vehicle collisions, consumption of toxic plants, and drowning in pools and canals. Urban sheep no longer behave in a manner that is most conducive to their long term health and survival. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 14 273 There is also a perception that because the golf courses provide such high quality forage that the urban Iambs are thriving and that each year the number of sheep at the golf courses increase. In reality, only 11% of Iambs born in 2015 to urban ewes survived through their first year. Most likely, the increase is mainly due to additional wild sheep in surrounding areas joining the Urban ewe group. For example, currently there are 2 radio -collared ewes that appear to be in the process of this transition. Ewe 353, radio -collared in November 2014, does not easily fall within the patterns of any of the CSRM ewe groups but most likely originally belonged to the South -A ewe group (Map 9). In 2015, this ewe spent only 1 day in March and 1 day in August on the SilverRock golf course: then in December, golf course use was increased to 10 days. Most likely, ewe 353 was on the slopes above the golf course and followed "urban" sheep onto the course. Starting in January 2016, ewe 353 used the golf course 21 days out of 31, but returned to safer habitat during lambing season in February. It is possible that in the next few years this ewe will complete the transition to the Urban ewe group. Ewe 417, radio -collared in November 2015, belongs to the South -A ewe group and travels from the steep slopes above SilverRock to Martinez Canyon 19 km south (Map 10). In February, ewe 417 spent time on the steep slopes above the golf courses. No doubt this ewe watched from above as other ewes in the urban group foraged on the golf courses below. Hopefully, a fence should be in place before this ewe, and others, become habituated to the urban environment. Ewe 353 Map 9 s Eve 3F3 • Lambing Ti— Frame Feb 824 215 0 Ev. 352_gdf_mu. e_lo.. ians IJaWral Wa[e.r Sou ces co `01 PCrP La Quinta 0* Cove 0 ° o O O ° O 0 �P' 0 8 Bear (:freek° °j V° o 0 0 0 00 A Tradition SilverRock 00, PGA 00 c 0 .,._West Q�C7si O n 0 ° $$ 0 8 The Quarry 0 0 t O 0 Q O � O o Devil Cahy o ° ° ° ° ° °. 00 0 ° Guadalupe Creek OM. ° °m0000 ° 0 e 8 oV O N 0 0.5 1 2 3 4 3 Kilvrneters +J Southern Santa Rosa Mountains: The SSRM recovery region is approximately 562 km2 with a density of approximately 0.27 sheep per kmz (based on 2010 417 Tradition n p a p 1O ®r_2015 - SilverRock � V � -or 2015 _2016 La Quint • 4• y_2o1s CoVe = ®° �'` PGA o 22-201b West Walar Sources SBS ° • �O O 0 c00 The Quarry Bear Creek ° Devil Canyon 0 • • Guadalupe Creek r Toro Canyon • a � • -M I o' t c ° o 0 c oZo ne $ o Alta Agua Canyon 81 o abundance estimate). In November 2015, 7 GPS (5 ewes and 2 rams) and 5 satellite collars (5 females) were deployed on sheep. No attempt has been made yet to define home range due to the short time frame of data collection. To date, ewe habitat use has been concentrated in a 10 by 10 km2 area that extends from just west of Rattlesnake Canyon to the eastern border of ABDSP (Map 11). The most northern boundary is just below Travertine Palms Canyon and the southern boundary is highway S22. Core use area, following the first few months post -deployment, has been located in an unnamed drainage due east of Smoke Tree Canyon and west of Calcite Mine. This core area has a saddle that allows easy access from the south -facing slopes to the north -facing slopes. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 15 274 vanecito fountains: i ne viva recovery region is approximately 708 km2 with a density of approximately 0.20 sheep per km2 (based on 2010 abundance estimate). It is the 2nd largest of all the recovery regions and is one of the most remote and inaccessible areas of the Peninsular Ranges. Due to inaccessibility, it is one of the least studied regions and only recently have we begun to understand ewe group structure and seasonal movements especially within the Fish Creek Mountains. Presently, there are 4 ewe groups that have been identified (Map 12). The "Lizard Wash" ewe group uses an area of approximately 12 x 7 km2 in the North Pinyon Mountains of the northwestern portion of the recovery region. The northwestern boundary is defined by Highway 78 and the southeastern boundary is Bighorn Canyon. Core use area is centered at Lizard Wash; however, data for several GPS- collared ewes have not yet been obtained. Water sources accessed in summer 2015 were along San Felipe Creek in Sentenac Canyon and at the Blue Spring Guzzler. Narrows 00 a Map 12 vallecito Mountains ��, • ° 0V0° ° Ewe Groups c5e �® • Lizand wash • Sunset Mountain . ° • Sunset .I • • �� io • ° NO • •• •+ $�° r45 G w ° % ° Ocotillo ells 0. o • Split Mountain 'Fish Craek Mountains p7hy ° bo �� Gyp surn_Mine r M®. .. I • oo • o ° t} guzzlers 4ta� Bighorn Canyon hs �� mod• Colo° flephan Tree NawraI VVatersources ° $ - Highway 78 bo 0 000 _ $b° ?" 9�R Whale Peak CP� 'oqB ° Os ✓° June Wash Q ° ° o ° ° ® Split Mou ° Q ° ° p ° ° ° $° p °, W pbo P �. o , 1 0 1.5 3 6 S 12 Ki meters Fish Creek � o Mountains The "Sunset Mountain" ewe group surrounds Sunset Mountain (Map 12). The western boundary is defined roughly by Pinyon Wash and the eastern boundary by Harper Canyon 6 km to the east. The northern boundary abuts Highway 78 through the Narrows while Harper Flats 7 km to the south serves as the southern boundary. Summer water is mainly obtained at the Sunset and Pinyon Wash Guzzlers with less frequent use at the Nolina and Harper Canyon Guzzlers. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 16 275 The "Split Mountain" ewe group has the largest use area of approximately 17 x 11 km (Map 12). The western boundary is around June Wash on the southern slopes of Whale Peak and the eastern boundary is at the dirt road into Split Mountain. The northern boundary is above Elephant Tree in the Vallecito Mountains and the southern boundary is the lower elevations of the Fish Creek Wash drainage. During the summer months, water was obtained at the Whale Peak Guzzler and at various tinajas (rock basins that collect and store rain water) in Fish, Stone, and Lycium Washes. The "Fish Creek" ewe group resides within the Fish Creek Mountains and has used an area of approximately 15 x 9 km thus far (Map 12). The northern boundary is to the east of a large Gypsum Mine operation in Imperial County and the southern boundary is north of Carrizo Wash. Thus far, core use area is in a large north/south running drainage on the eastern side of the Fish Creek Mountains. To date, we have data from only 3 of the 5 GPS-collared ewes and summer locations have yet to be obtained. THREATS TO RECOVERY Section D 1.1-1.4 of the Peninsular Ranges bighorn sheep recovery plan describes a series of interim and long- term actions which, if implemented, would eliminate or significantly reduce threats to population recovery. Actions described in the plan address a broad range of known and potential threats to recovery. These threats (generally described) include but may not be limited to: 1) habitat loss and fragmentation; 2) loss of habitat connectivity; 3) loss of habitat quality due to natural (fire) and human causes (introduction of exotic/toxic vegetation); 4) loss, reduction or diversion of water sources; 4) use of the urban interface; 5) livestock grazing; 6) road and highway crossing; and 7) human activities known or found to be directly or indirectly detrimental to sheep. Because bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges reside in a network of state, federal, private, and tribal government lands which lie adjacent to large human urban populations, reaching recovery goals and assuring long-term protections for sheep will require an understanding of and commitment to eliminating threats within and among recovery regions. Identified threats as described in the Peninsular Ranges recovery plan are detailed below by recovery region. San Jacinto Mountains, and Northern and Central Santa Rosa Mountains - Threats and concerns — habitat loss and fragmentation, urban use, disease, human disturbance, vehicle collisions, and domestic livestock: Urban development within and adjacent to sheep habitat continue to be of concern within these 3 recovery regions. In the SJM recovery region there are several proposed housing developments adjacent to sheep habitat. Currently under construction is the Desert Palisades subdivision on 112 acres within sheep habitat in the Chino Cone area. Connectivity across Chino Canyon is restricted by the Tramway road, fencing, and human activities. In the area surrounding Blaisdell Canyon, domestic sheep and goats that are not properly fenced or are allowed to run loose can potentially spread disease to the wild sheep population. Connectivity between the CSRM and NSRM recovery regions is impeded by Highway 74 and each year sheep are struck and killed by vehicles while attempting to cross the highway (Map NSRM Recovery Region Hwy 3 PBS Road Collisions Highway 74 , .collisions +ea2015 - 4 B 2014 - 3 '>rt' 2013 - 1 2012 - 1 2011 - 1 2010 - 1 2009 - 1 ! 2008 - 2 �'�; •�r: Y 2007 - 2 Sheep Locations t» • 14,, CSRM _. Recovery Region �mF a 13). Improved signage and warning devices may prevent accidents that can potentially harm both sheep and humans. Future increases in the traffic load on this stretch of the highway may eventually cut off any movement between the NSRM and CSRM. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 17 276 Human disturbance in areas identified as lambing and nursery habitat continues to be of concern within these 3 recovery regions. In the CSRM in particular, the West, Urban, and South -A ewe groups' locations overlap in the area just south of La Quinta Cove and thus serve as an important movement corridor between lambing and nursery grounds, foraging habitat, and water sources (Map 14). This vital sheep habitat is also used extensively by recreational users. There are 3 official trails CSRM Sheep Group Overlap --- Map 14 - through this area: Bear ° West Sheep Locations :` ` r L. Urban Sheep Locations �� "i• .,,3 Creek trail, Boo Hoff Trail, o South A Sheep Locations {'¢ CrA ^: s ear Creek Trall � 1 ! � ^ � — 5. T and the Cove to Lake Trail. ____— BnaffTrall '", ti, Baa_ Signs that clearly state that - —•• County Park Trail Cove Ta Lake trail dogs are not allowed are r. s {` M �i k 4 disregarded by the public ' r , especially on the Cove t0 La Quinta Cove Lake Trail. There is an q _ ¢, extensive system of illegal trails (social trails) that are q Lake % often used by mountain bikers and hikers in the area around the Boo Hoff trail. This area has been identified as ewe nursery o� The Quarry," ' habitat. The social trails that extend into steep sheep habitat off the east- , o Y a side of the Cove to Lake, e �" Trail local) referred to as x _ R (locally , off. k the "overlook trail") also - occur in what has been identified as lambing habitat. Because this is particularly important sheep habitat, we recommend that rules on trails be enforced and unauthorized trails eliminated. CSRM rams have been documented foraging on golf courses in La Quinta since 2007; and in 2012, ewes and Iambs began foraging at golf courses as well. Ewes and their Iambs now forage at PGA West, SilverRock, or Tradition on a daily basis. Incidents of sheep walking on the streets and throughout residential neighborhoods in La Quinta continue to increase each year. Sheep use of the urban environment changes their natural foraging patterns and behavior and expose them to a variety of risks such as increased spread of diseases, vehicle strikes, entanglement, drowning, predation, increased parasite loads, and exposure to toxins. Since 2012, 3 rams and 1 Iamb have drowned in the Coachella Canal, 1 ram was rescued from the canal, 1 ram died from oleander poisoning, and 1 ram was struck and killed on Jefferson Avenue. Disease is rapidly spread among sheep that concentrate within the golf course communities. In 2015, Iambs on the golf course were observed with pneumonia and only 11% of these Iambs survived their first year (refer to sections on Respiratory Disease and Lamb Survival and Recruitment for details). Fencing at the urban interface is identified as a site specific recovery action for the Santa Rosa Mountains south of Highway 74 in Section II.D.1.2 of the recovery plan (USFWS 2000). Construction of fencing to exclude bighorn sheep from golf courses and residential areas in La Quinta would be an important step toward preventing urban related mortalities and enhance efforts toward conservation of sheep in the CSRM. For example, the exclusion fence built in Rancho Mirage in 2002 has completely eliminated urban -related bighorn sheep deaths. Other potential actions, such as the capture and removal of sheep from the golf course communities would not be feasible. Ewes teach their Iambs where to obtain food and water and once a pattern of use (home range) is established it is maintained from one cohort to the next. Sheep are capable of traveling great distances over a short period of time and would easily find their way back to their original home range. Furthermore, because disease has been identified within the urban ewe group, removal of these sheep to another area would facilitate the spread of disease to other areas of the range. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 18 277 Southern Santa Rosa Mountains - Threats and concerns — habitat loss and degradation, depleting water sources, human disturbance (off -road vehicles), disease, and predation: Gold mine exploration is taking place within sheep habitat in the Wonderstone Wash area in the eastern portion of this recovery region. Sheep habitat within the boundaries of ABDSP does not guarantee protection due to incursions by off -road vehicles in washes that are presently not patrolled by the State Park. In the past, there have been at least 4 reliable sources of water for sheep in the SSRM: Rattlesnake Springs, Limestone Guzzler, North Palm Wash tinaja, and Natural Rock Tanks tinajas. Recently, some natural springs and tinajas have dried up in the latter portion of the summer. If drought conditions continue these water sources may no longer meet the needs of sheep within this recovery region. A remote camera was placed at Rattlesnake Spring from fall 2011 through summer 2012. No predators, except for an occasional bobcat, were caught on the camera; however, during the late spring and summer sheep were captured on camera in large numbers throughout the day and night. The refill rate of the spring could not keep up with the demand and the spring was often dry by 0900 hours each day. Observations by a CDFW biologist in more accessible areas have demonstrated that sheep with pneumonia will spend increasingly more time near a water source as their disease progresses. This may result in an increased incidence of disease in areas of high sheep concentration. Recently radio -collared sheep within this recovery region and placement of more cameras at springs will help determine whether water enhancement projects may be warranted. Coyote Canyon - Threats and concerns — water source accessibility, disease, predation, and human disturbance: The jeep road from Lower Willows to Middle Willows is closed by ABDSP Superintendent Order from June 1 through September 30 in order to protect the watering rights of bighorn sheep. However, Coyote Creek is a dynamic system and the area traditionally used by sheep to obtain water at Lower Willows above the closure has filled in with dense vegetation making it difficult for sheep to access water. In the past few years, sheep have been accessing water at or below the closure gate where it is more open and escape terrain is closer. Moving the closure gate to just below 2nd crossing may help to ensure that sheep can obtain water in a safe location without human disturbance. Disease in this recovery region continues to be a threat (refer to section on Lamb Survival) and CDFW will continue to monitor for possible increases in disease occurrence. Typically, sheep that live within recovery regions with perennial streams and extensive riparian areas (CoC, NSYM, and CC) have higher predation rates than sheep living in areas without perennial streams. Sick Iambs will often increase the amount of time they spend near water sources which in turn increases their risk of predation. Furthermore, in past years, CDFW has documented on at least 5 occasions females standing guard over their dead Iambs (deaths due to pneumonia) for up to 3 days. In 2 of these cases, it resulted in the adult females being killed by a mountain lion. It is also possible that ravens at the carcass site may key predators to their location: dead Iambs are now removed when found near a ewe. Northern San Ysidro Mountains - Threats and concerns — urban use, vehicle collision, disease, predation, and human disturbance: An increase in urban use by sheep within this recovery region continues to be a concern as sheep become more habituated and increase their use each year at the DeAnza Villas and golf course community. This development poses a threat to the health and survival of sheep in this recovery region due to possible ingestion of poisonous ornamental plants, facilitation of the spread of disease, accidents such as vehicle collisions and drowning in pools or ponds, drinking contaminated water, and increased predation at the urban interface. Presently, CDFW is examining the feasibility of installing barrier fencing along the boundary of ABDSP and DeAnza Villas. Another major threat to sheep within this recovery region is movement across county road 522. One of the most frequently crossed sections of this road is between mile marker 13 and 14.5 with several past sheep deaths documented at a specific point just below mile marker 14. CDFW is examining the feasibility of placing warning lights and signs at locations along stretches of S22 to reduce this risk. In August 2015, most water sources within Borrego-Palm Canyon (BPC) dried up and sheep were forced to rely on the pupfish pond adjacent to the trailhead parking lot. If this trend continues, placement of another water source closer to the slopes and away from the trailhead parking lot may allow sheep to access water without being disturbed while still allowing visitors to access the trailhead parking area. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 19 278 Pneumonia in Iambs continued to take a Y toll on Iamb survival In 2015 (refer to: section on Lamb Survival and r • " Recruitment). As Iambs become sicker they spend a significant amount of time near the creek in BPC. This occurs at the same time park visitation numbers soar within the canyon (Photo 4). The BPC trail is not maintained and visitors often rt ; become lost and end up off -trail`" 3 following the dry creek bed where sheep often congregate. While the sheep In ,. this canyon are habituated, it is not known if constant disturbance in the ' form of visitors approaching and sick Iambs may decrease photographing Y their chances of survival or impede 1tobyTolby movement to and from water sources Photo 4. Visitors to Borrego-Palm Canyon in Anza-Borrego Desert State Park photograph and admire and high quality forage alongside the a ewe (upper left). These visitors all thought that the ewe was curious about the people and looking at them. However, the ewe was looking for her Iamb that was on the slopes behind the crowds and stream. Increasing the number of Park was attempting to find a way past the crowds to reach her Iamb. Docents along known sheep use areas during busy weekends (specifically at the junction of the regular trail and the alternate trail), educating park visitors, posting signs, and regular trail maintenance to keep people on existing trails may help ensure sick Iambs and foraging sheep are not disturbed at this critical time. Southern San Ysidro Mountains - Threats and concerns — vehicle collision, maintaining water sources, disease, and predation: County road S3 between Pinyon Ridge and Yaqui Ridge bisects the SSYM recovery region and Highway 78 at the Narrows serves as a movement corridor between the SSYM and VM recovery regions. Sheep are most often struck and killed on both sections of these roads during the early spring when ewes are moving between the lambing and nursery grounds. Unfortunately, this coincides with an increase in traffic during the peak of visitation to ABDSP and the Ocotillo Wells Off -Road Recreation Park. Reducing and enforcing the speed limit at common crossing locations on county road S3 and through the Narrows on Highway 78 as well as use of warning devices and signage may help reduce sheep deaths. The Tubb Canyon Guzzler which resides on private property has fallen into disrepair and no longer functions. Springs farther up the canyon within ABDSP were accessible for a few years following a fire in 2012 but have since filled in with vegetation. Water depletion, accessibility and regular maintenance of guzzlers within this recovery region needs to be addressed by ABDSP in order to ensure future access to water for sheep. Vallecito Mountains - Threats and concerns- maintaining water sources, habitat loss, human disturbance, and disease: The Fish Creek Mountains (FCM) ewe group resides in the eastern portion of this recovery region which is largely outside the protection of BLM wilderness and wilderness areas within ABDSP and thus vulnerable to habitat loss and fragmentation (Map 12). Presently, there is a gypsum mine (with plans for expansion) at the northern portion of the FCM ewe group home range and off -road vehicle use and target shooting is allowed within BLM land on the eastern edge of this ewe group. For over 30 years, ABDSP has maintained numerous guzzlers within this recovery region and sheep have become dependent upon their use. However, in recent years guzzlers maintenance has been deferred and leaks resulted in several dry guzzlers. In addition, due to drought conditions there has not been enough rain to fill some of the guzzlers. Fortunately, because there are numerous guzzlers, sheep were able to shift their use to functioning guzzlers. Starting in 2015, ABDSP trained volunteers to check the condition of guzzlers; however, a long-term plan and maintenance program/funding needs to be assessed by ABDSP. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 20 279 Carrizo Canyon: - Threats and concerns — vehicle collisions, habitat loss and fragmentation, disease, water accessibility, human disturbance, and domestic livestock: In the past few years there has been an increase in the number of sick Iambs observed in 3 of 4 ewe groups (Tierra Blanca, IKP, and Carrizo). In June of 2015, a dead Iamb was found in Carrizo Canyon and lab results identified Mycoplosma ovipneumoniae (M.ovi) as the likely causative pathogen. CDFW will continue to monitor disease among these ewe groups. Each year, there are several reports of non collared sheep being stuck and killed by vehicles while crossing Interstate 8 (Map 15). In March of 2014, the first collared ewe was struck and killed while crossing the east -bound lanes of 1-8. In 2015, a non -collared ewe and ram were killed in the same general area of the east -bound lanes This section of the Interstate bisects the seasonal movement pathway of both rams and ewes, and as Interstate traffic continues to increase each year, seasonal movement pathways will eventually be cut off. CDFW staff continues to recommend that USFWS and renewable energy project proponents implement vehicle strike hazard reduction PISS Road Kill Map 15 Interstate 8 2015 nr 2014 2012.. .f e West -Bound Lanes '',•'• •: East -Bound �. Lanes a•:,p, f'n' � ',,•�f ��" _ .yw'w��F'°�1�sfry �+ ° r r,: ''�;'7E . sow :.�� YJer Ya fl6Y y � ly � AN C204 .3 '1 i f (funnel and barrier fencing and signage) and habitat improvement measures required to off -set impacts from energy developments on bighorn sheep habitat in the CC recovery region. It is hoped that the required off -set measures can be fulfilled in order to reduce strike hazards and improve habitat values for bighorn sheep. However, elimination of vehicle strike hazards will ultimately require the construction of overpass structures and directional fencing along the 1-8 In-Ko-Pah Gorge corridor. Water availability and access to water is a growing concern. Mountain Spring is an important source of water for sheep in the IKP ewe group. Mountain Spring is on San Diego County Park land and is adjacent to the west -bound lanes of Interstate 8. While vehicle access to the spring is restricted from the Interstate, the spring can be accessed via a jeep trail from the west. In 2015, there were numerous large jeep events held near the spring: this road needs to be gated to restrict public use in order to protect the watering rights of bighorn sheep. There are numerous small ranches only a few miles to the west and recently a lost horse has been seen using the spring. While horses are not known to spread disease to wild sheep, the presence of a horse indicates property owners may not be properly fencing their livestock. If domestic goats or sheep were to become loose they could potentially spread disease to this ewe group. Farther north, sheep within the Tierra Blanca ewe group are dependent on the water sources at Agua Caliente County Park (ACCP) and Canebrake Canyon. The campground at ACCP is closed to the public during the summer which allows sheep free access to the multiple springs within the campground. Campground staff should attempt to minimize any construction activities during this time. Oleander bushes (Nerium oleander) throughout the campground were removed in 2013; however, the County needs to regularly check and remove any regrowth of oleander within the campground in order to prevent sheep deaths due to oleander poisoning. The water sources along Canebrake Canyon reside on private property. The Canyon is being choked by tamarisk (Tamarix spp.) which may eventually prevent access to water and out -compete native plant species that are an important source of forage for sheep during the summer and fall months. Tamarisk continues to be a problem at some water sources (Jacumba Jim and Black Water) within Carrizo Canyon as well. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 21 280 Since 2009, GPS data have identified areas within the CC recovery region that are vital sheep habitat and movement corridors (Map 16). Sheep within these ewe groups face increasing challenges posed by renewable energy developments, access road construction and maintenance related to border security, and human disturbance. Presently, target shooting is allowed on BLM land within the 1-8 Island and is accessed via the Mountain Springs exit; furthermore, jeep activities in Devils Canyon may restrict free movement of sheep to and from their Iamb rearing habitat within the Island. Border security activity throughout the recovery region is intensive with regular vehicle patrols, foot patrols, and helicopter flights both night and day within Iamb rearing habitat and movement corridors in designated wilderness areas. It is not currently known to what extent these activities may alter, discourage, or restrict sheep movement and use of important resources. There have been several instances, documented by the CDFW biologist, when low flying border security and military helicopters have disrupted normal sheep activities. Border Patrol activities have created a network of roads within the bounds of wilderness areas that also allows unauthorized vehicle access to the general publics. The following areas are considered important sheep movement corridors and habitat within the border region that have been impacted by unauthorized roads: Bow Willow Canyon, Rockhouse Canyon, Sweeney Canyon, Jojoba Wash, the Volcanic Hills, Devils Canyon, the jeep road to Mountain Spring, Myer Valley access from east -bound Interstate 8, Davies Canyon and Valley, the eastern Jacumba Mountains with access to canyons at Coyote Roads number one and two, and Pinto Wash. The Jacumba ewe group is dependent on resources both within the US and Mexico. A fence along the US -Mexico border would rohibit movement to United states Mexico P and use of prelambing and Iamb rearing habitat and summer water sources. Furthermore, Iamb rearing habitat in the east Jacumba Mountains is not within USFWS designated critical sheep habitat (Map 16) and any further energy projects development within or adjacent to the these areas combined with disturbance by border security activities may have significant adverse effects on this ewe group. FUTURE ACTIONS Program activities for 2016 include monitoring radio -collared sheep to detect and investigate mortalities, obtain ground observations to assess group composition, health and disease, lamb:ewe and yearling:ewe ratios, collecting location and movement data, and capture and radio -collaring. A capture is planned for fall 2016 to increase the number of radio - collars in the CC and NSYM recovery regions in order to assure a minimum of 25% marked sheep in all recovery regions prior to a rangewide helicopter survey. Following the fall capture, a rangewide population survey will be conducted to generate an abundance estimate. Additionally, CDFW will update rangewide population structure, distribution, and movement based on GPS data collection. CDFW personnel involved in peninsular sheep recovery will establish department program activities for the next three year period (2017-2020) and will coordinate with federal, state, local and NGO recovery program partners on recovery actions. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 22 281 00 �& _ � 5 A >� AriU414 oto by Jeff Youn', Special Thanks to Jeff Young for allowing us to use his photographs in this report CITATIONS y d" Besser, T.E., Cassirer, E.F., Potter, K.A., VanderSchalie, J., Fischer, A., et al. 2008. Association of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae infection with population -limiting respiratory disease in free -ranging Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis). Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 46, 423-430. Besser, T.E., Highland, M., Baker, K., Cassirer, E.F., Anderson, N.J., Ramsey, J.M., Mansfield, K.M., Bruning, D., Wolff, P., Smith, J.B. & Jenks, J.A. 2012. Causes of pneumonia epizootics among bighorn sheep, western United States, 2008- 2010. Buchalski, M.R., Navarro, A. Y., Boyce, W. M., Vickers, T.W., & Tobler, M.W., et al. 2015. Genetic population structure of Peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni) indicates substantial gene flow across US —Mexico border. Biological Conservation 184: 218-228. Cassirer, E. F., & Sinclair, A. R. E. 2007. Dynamics of pneumonia in a bighorn sheep metapopulation. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71(4):1080-1088. Cassirer E. F., Plowright, R. K., Manlove, K. R., Cross, P. C., Dobson, A. P., et al. 2013. Spatio-temporal dynamics of pneumonia in bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis). Journal of Animal Ecology 82:518-528. Colby, J., & Botta, R. 2012. CDFW 2012 Peninsular bighorn sheep annual report and recovery program review 1993 — 2012. Available on-line at www.wildlife.ca.gov Colby, J. & Botta, R. 2014. CDFW 2014 Peninsular bighorn sheep annual report. Available on-line at www.wildlife.ca. DeForge, J. R. & Scott, J. E. 1982. Ecological investigations into high Iamb mortality. Desert Bighorn Council Transactions 26:65-76 Fredrickson, R., & Mills, L. S. 2009. Methods for evaluation of risks and benefits of population augmentation options to facilitate recovery of bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges, California. Unpublished report produced for CDFW. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 23 282 Hobbs, N. T., & Miller, M. 1991. Interactions between pathogens and hosts: simulations of Pasteurellosis epizootics in bighorn sheep populations. Pages 997-1007 in R. H. Barrett, editor. Wildlife 2001: populations. Elsevier Applied Science, New York. Horn, P. J. & Vaughan, J. G. 1983. Seed glucosinolates of 14 wild Brassica species. Phytochemistry 22(2): 465-470. Lawrence, P.K., Shanthalingam, S., Dassanayake, R.P, Subramanian, R., Herndon, C.N., et al. 2010. Transmission of Mannheimia haemolytica from Domestic Sheep (Ovis aries) to Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis): Unequivocal Demonstration with Green Fluorescent Protein -Tagged Organisms. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 46(3): 706-717. Plowright, R. K., Manlove, K., Cassirer, E. F., Cross, C., Besser, T. E., & Hudson, P. J. 2013. Use of Exposure History to Identify Patterns of Immunity to Pneumonia in Bighorn Sheep (Ovis canadensis). PLoS ONE 8(4): e61919. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0061919 Rubin, E. S., Boyce, W. M., & Caswell -Chen, E. P. 2002. Modeling demographic processes in an endangered population of bighorn sheep. Journal of Wildlife Management 66:796-810. Rudolph, K. M., Hunter, D. L., Rimler, R. B., Cassirer, E. F., Foreyt, W. J., et al. 2007. Microorganisms associated with a bighorn sheep pneumonia epizootic in Hells Canyon, USA. J. Zoo Wildl. Med. 38:548-558. Scott, P. R. 2007. Other Nervous Diseases. Pages 259-261 in I.D. Aitken editor. Diseases of Sheep Fourth Edition. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK. Singer, F. J., Williams, E. S., Miller, M. W., & Zeigenfuss, L. C. 2000. Population growth, fecundity, and survivorship in recovering populations of bighorn sheep. Restoration Ecology 8:75-84. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2000. Recovery plan for bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges, California. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, OR. xv+251 pp. Weaver, R. A. 1975. Status of the bighorn sheep in California. In: The wild sheep in modern North America. J.B. Trefethen, ed. Boone and Crockett Club. Alexandria, Virginia. Pp. 58-64. Wehausen, J. D., Kelley, S. T., & Ramey II, R. R. 2011. Domestic sheep, bighorn sheep, and respiratory disease: a review of the experimental evidence. California Fish and Game 97(1):7-24. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Annual Report 2015 Page 24 283 284 Exhibit 2: Bighorn Institute Monthly Updates February to October 2016 285 February 2016 I bighoaninstitute J i o�-n Jens tine HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Drarl��e February 2o16 Lambing Update Lambing is in full swing in the wild and we have now documented 30 Iambs so far in our study area from Palm Springs to La Quinta. There are still many other ewes that should give birth in the coming weeks so we're in the field frequently hoping we don't miss any collared ewes' Iambs. Lambing season extends from January through June for Peninsular bighorn with the peak between February and April. Recent rain has the mountains greening up beautifully now providing amazing vegetation for the sheep. It's an exciting, but busy season and we look forward to documenting many more Iambs this year! �� XTir;{�vrralrr.sirPute ^. We're thrilled to announce that our website has been completely redesigned and should make for a much better experience for each visitor! It has in-depth information about bighorn sheep, beautiful bighorn °^~ F photos, current news and connects easily to our Facebook account. We've got some exciting new projects in the works this year, including the Naturalist citizen science project, and member only hikes so check out our website from time to time as it will be updated frequently. Follow Us 0 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O2/29/February-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:28:25 PM] 4:. February 2016 I bighorninstitute La Quinta Bighorn Barrier Meeting On March 10, 2016, at 7:00 pm, there will be a Public Scoping meeting at the La Quinta City Hall Council Chambers to discuss the Bighorn Barrier Project in La Quinta. This project addresses the urban issues bighorn in La Quinta face, such as utilizing the golf courses; A - as an artificial source of food and water. This meeting is open to the public and is an opportunity for you to ask questions, voice your concerns and comment relative to the bighorn barrier (i.e., fence) project. Bighorn rams have been coming down to the La Quinta golf courses since 2007 and ewes and Iambs since 2012. Seven bighorn sheep are known to have died as a direct result of coming down to the La Quinta urban areas since 2012: 4 sheep have drowned in the canal (including 1 Iamb), 1 ram ate poisonous oleander, 1 ram was hit and killed by a car on Jefferson, and 1 Iamb was deathly ill on the golf course and was euthanized. We feel a fence is necessary to keep bighorn sheep safe and out of the urban areas of La Quinta. For more information about the Bighorn Barrier Project and this meeting, visit http://www.cvmshcp.org. �'-. lii�7nt.rrr lrrrl illrtr* - NEW Citizen Science program! H.— you u K91hom shekp7 We warn 1e 0 1,M] .d V 00 [nn help uc —p — e11he—dangere. —in— bl,- sheep in the Ceathello Valley by for tlr� yaur s7,rhHnes! I.D 104 the !R.a[_in: N app W"Q.* �Hxlran30.Crd 1. ilrn o Itt [hls free ttcpum nr Ix� fn wish an existim¢ F—b.4 Twltxtr ifthy;6pe¢4 et Veh. —brut 3. Se-h pr"— &jili7 Wl .h Int A—" pidje417 CIE— your *-p tlrhtinrc Inc lu&kd ph— dtl4ETHtlk w. xill weeE m.wre tna [tes»M,attMl males[It ra=.rswr.. the endryrrsd?sn�ncApr p�ora rhrral THAN,-.. YOU :llaturallsl IitfdlUidliS[.t7r_y New Citizen Science Project Have you seen bighorn sheep here in the valley? If so, we want to know about it! You can be a Citizen Scientist by providing us with your bighorn sightings. This information helps us to keep track of the wild herd since most of them are unmarked. Your sightings will help us determine the population size and demography, where they are, etc. We have started a Bighorn Institute project with iNaturalist and you can easily log your sheep sightings via the iNaturalist app or on iNatural ist.org. Signing up for an account is free or you can log in with an existing Facebook, Twitter, Flickr, Google or Yahoo account. For more information, visit our Citizen Science page on our website. New Member Only Bighorn Hike On Thursday March 10th at 8:00 am, Bighorn Institute will hold its inaugural 287 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O2/29/February-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:28:25 PM] February 2016 I bighominstitute Member Only Bighorn Hike! One of Bighorn Institute's biologists will take you on a local hiking trail in sheep habitat to look for the endangered Peninsular bighorn sheep. You will learn all about the local bighorn and with a bighorn biologist as your guide, hopefully see sheep! Membership starts at just $25/year and is tax-deductible. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760-346-7334. 0 Comments Add a comment... F1 Facebook Comments Plugin Upcoming Presentation: Rancho Mirage Library On March 31st at 2:00 pm, Bighorn Institute will give a presentation at the Rancho Mirage Public Library titled "Bighorn Sheep in the Coachella Valley and Beyond." This presentation is open to the public and we hope you will attend. sort by oldest I http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O2/29/February-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:28:25 PM] March 2016 1 bighorninstitute ighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Drarlaj* March 2o16 Wildflower Festival On March 5th, Bighorn Institute participated in the annual Wildflower Festival at the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument Visitor Center. The wildflowers were wonderful and it was another beautiful day in paradise! The festival was well attended and was a great venue for Bighorn Institute to inform folks about the endangered Peninsular bighorn sheep and our research and conservation efforts for the species. Thanks to all who stopped by to share your sheep sightings and stories! Rancho Mirage Library Presentation We will give a presentation on Thursday March 31st at 2:00pm at the Rancho Mirage Library on bighorn sheep in the Coachella Valley and beyond. We hope you will join us! Member Only Bighorn Hike On Thursday March 10th, Bighorn Institute held its inaugural Member Only Bighorn Hike, which was a great success! Bighorn Institute's biologists took a small group on a local hiking trail in La Quinta to look for bighorn sheep. We had great success as right away we spotted a group of ewes and Iambs from our meeting spot! However, they were very far away and was difficult to Follow Us 0 1► : • http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/03/31/March-2016-The-Monthly-Bighorn-Report[11/5/2016 4:29:14 PM] March 2016 1 bighorninstitute see, even with a spotting scope so we hit the trail. Around halfway through the hike, fs: we found a group of rams that were a bit K closer and quite viewable. Everyone thoroughly enjoyed themselves since we were successful seeing sheep and had the added bonus of beautiful wildflowers. Our next Member Only Bighorn Hike will be Thursday April 14th at 8:OOam. We'd love to have you join us. Membership starts at just $25/year and is tax-deductible. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760- 346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Lambing is in Full Swing Lambing continues in the wild and we have now documented over 40 Iambs so far in our study area from Palm Springs to La Quinta. They range from just a week old to nearly 3 months old as many were born in January. There are still a number of ewes that should give birth in the coming weeks so we're in the field daily looking for new animals. Lambing season can run through June for Peninsular bighorn with the peak between February and April. Another Bighorn Falls into Canal The Coachella Canal runs through SilverRock and PGA West golf courses in La Quinta and in late March, we received a report that a bighorn fell into the canal. Thankfully, it was able to get out on its own. Since August 2012, we know of 7 rams that have fallen into this canal; 4 have drowned. We continue to reiterate the need for a fence to keep the bighorn off of these golf courses and in their natural habitat. Bighorn in Dead Indian Canyon In late March, we observed a group of 14 bighorn sheep, including several Iambs, up high in Dead Indian Canyon. The Art Smith trail begins in this canyon and many hikers KIMI http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/03/31/March-2016-The-Monthly-Bighorn-Report[11/5/2016 4:29:14 PM] March 2016 1 bighorninstitute were taking advantage of the beautiful weather to go for a hike. We had a spotting scope set up and were showing people the sheep and it turned out to be a wonderful educational opportunity. Dead Indian and v _ Carrizo Canyons are closed from January — June for lambing season as well as Jul September for the hot season to protect bighorn water sources. We got to see first-hand how these closures are important to the sheep while they rear their Iambs. They need areas of low disturbance to successfully raise their young and they were up in the steep escape terrain where they can better avoid predators. Of course, the sheep kept an eye on us as well, but we were far away and posed no threat. If you hike the Art Smith trail, keep a lookout for bighorn sheep! If you see some, give us a call 760-346-7334. Or, log your sheep sighting into Bighorn Institute's citizen science project in Naturalist; it's free and easy just visit our website for details www.bighorninstitute.org. 0 WIIts o Sort by oldest . Add a comment... F Facebook Comments Plugin 291 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/03/31/March-2016-The-Monthly-Bighorn-Report[11/5/2016 4:29:14 PM] April 2016 I bighorninstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Donate April 2 o16 Bighorn Released into the Wild In early April, Bighorn Institute released an adult ewe from its captive herd into the northern Santa Rosa Mountains. Prior to her release, this ewe was health tested and�lx�; fitted with a radio- collar and - eartag. The A, 1 capture and release went well and the ewe seems to be adjusting to her new environment. She has been seen with other sheep and looks great (good body condition, alert, etc.) We have now released 127 bighorn sheep into the wild over the years and this ewe is the 100th bighorn born in the captive herd that was released into the wild. This released ewe must survive in the wild for at least 4 months to be considered a successful release so we will continue to track her daily, but are certainly pleased with her progress so far. Bighorn Presentations We gave two presentations in the past month that were welcome opportunities for some bighorn education. In late March, we spoke at the Rancho Mirage Library on bighorn sheep in the Coachella Valley and beyond. In early April, we gave a presentation to the Coachella Valley Hiking Club at the Palm Desert Library. The presentations were well attended and there were very informative question/answer sessions following each talk. If you would Follow Us 0 292 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O5/O2/April-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:27:03 PM] April 2016 I bighorninstitute like us to give a bighorn presentation, please give us a call at (760) 346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Bighorn Hikes for Members On Thursday April 14th, Bighorn Institute took its monthly Bighorn Hike for Members in Palm Desert. The weather was beautiful and there were still a few wildflowers to enjoy as we glassed for bighorn sheep. Our next Bighorn Hike for Members will be Friday May 20th at 8:OOam and we'd love to have you join us. Membership starts at just $25/year and is completely tax-deductible. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Lambs in the Wild New Iambs have been born since our last 5_ report and we have now documented around 50 Iambs born in our study area from Palm Springs to La Quinta. They are ,:. growing quickly and many of the older Iambs +, (3-4 months old) have noticeable horn w growth. There has been abundant available vegetation, thanks to the January rain, so field conditions are quite favorable for now. �. There are already a number of sick Iambs on the golf courses of La Quinta, which is expected as they graze in urban areas in unusually large groups where disease can spread easily. That said, the Iambs in the natural habitat look good so far, but we will continue to monitor the sheep because we expect all ewes to give birth, but what's critical is how many Iambs survive to adulthood. 293 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O5/O2/April-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:27:03 PM] April 2016 I bighorninstitute Citizen Science - You Can Help! Have you seen bighorn sheep while out hiking? If so, we'd like to know about it. We have a new project on the Naturalist app where we're getting the community involved in logging Peninsular desert bighorn sightings. This information helps us to keep track of the local herds as well as helps us to determine the number of bighorn, sex ratios, etc. It's free, it's easy and we hope you'll join Bighorn Institute's Naturalist project and help with our conservation efforts. Please click on the photo for details. Other Wildlife a M 0 0 0 Comments Ej Facebook Comments Plugin �e u4'�] rvfw Cll3ien 5€ienee program) l M1slparr*r.rMp wry e�drryera, hrs.wlw Ykhrrx.lwxe4, oa aa.n.0 v.o.rey u� w�,yrx.,.r —Mu L— WgF,. rwnr... nwr . wcgr wnowaounw< t seara�pale. x.tep.n ryxern wixwp. p�q.A M��, ..�tiwa.,r�r�w,x•r�,r�p,p,�.� x.ma ower..enrx. ba wax e..,n..�.r.wvn Y.... To¢rnat we,Yav:vseewa,a ae+*+m+rrx,rm.mNeak .=..r ka�,.xeeremxeRd ronwr.r w,ewe.�.pi iNANK Y9V! LNaturalist-u It's been an active year for snakes already and we've seen a number of snakes on our property including a Southwest Speckled Rattlesnake (Crotalus mitchellii pyrrhus) and a Red Racer (Coluber flagellum piceus). The Institute is on 300 acres of open desert with many native species of plants and animals on site. While bighorn sheep are our focus and passion, we have a deep appreciation for all that lives in the desert as each species plays a unique role in this beautiful ecosystem we call home. Sort by oldest http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O5/O2/April-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:27:03 PM] April 2016 1 bighominstitute 295 http://www.bighominstiitate.org/single-post/2Ol6/05/02/April-2016-The-Monthly-Bighom-Report[11/5/2016 4:27:03 PM] May 2016 I bighominstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Dom* May 2o16 5 Lambs Die in Two Weeks May saw significant loss as five young endangered Peninsular bighorn Iambs died on two golf resorts in La Quinta (PGA West and SilverRock). These Iambs died within a two week period and were showing signs of upper respiratory infection (coughing, nasal discharge, droopy ears and significant weight loss). This is the second year in a row that Iambs utilizing the golf courses in Lail-- Quinta have become sick and many died. Last year, only 2 of 10 Iambs using the courses survived and so far, we know that 5 of 15 Iambs have died this year around the golf courses. We expect more Iambs to die in the coming weeks. The sheep on these golf courses browse in abnormally large groups so when one animal is sick, disease can spread like wildfire. As long as there is no barrier to keep the sheep out of these urban areas, we anticipate this trend will continue. Twelve bighorn sheep, that we know of, have now died in and around the La Quinta golf courses, since 2012. Four have drowned in the Coachella Canal, one ate oleander, one was hit by a car and six were sick and died. In 2014, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and California Department of Fish and Wildlife wrote a joint letter requiring a barrier (i.e., a fence) to be built within 2 years around these La Quinta golf courses, but the authorities are still "studying" the issue. The 2 year deadline was February 28, 2016, and already 5 Iambs have died since that expiration date. We have received much feedback from the recent news casts and newspaper articles about the Iamb deaths and people keep asking us what can be done. Our best advice is to contact the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, CA Department of Fish & Wildlife, City of La Quinta and CVAG and ask why this Follow Us 0 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/05/31/May-2016[11/5/2016 4:26:13 PM] May 2016 I bighominstitute is not being enforced. Sheep in the Streets As if five Iambs dying wasn't ° enough stress in ' La Quinta, there _ were a few days that numerous sheep strayed into the streets, especially around SilverRock 4 Resort. In late ID May, 2 yearling ewes wandered ,r a along Avenue 52 nearly 3 miles - - from the nearest mountains. - _ Luckily, concerned motorists got behind the ewes and slowly drove behind them as they made it back to SilverRock and headed toward the hills. The next day, close to 30 sheep, ewes, Iambs and rams, crossed the 4 lanes of Avenue 52 to eat citrus. They ventured out along the Jefferson circle later in the day. These incidents pose serious human safety issues as well as bighorn safety issues. Fencing along the golf courses would prevent bighorn from straying in the streets and protect us all. I_IT, [j "111-07m:nI On Friday May 20th, Bighorn Institute held its monthly Member Hike, which was a great success! Bighorn Institute's biologists took a small group on a hiking trail in Oswit (Eagle) Canyon in Palm Springs to look for bighorn sheep. We were able to track a 297 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/05/31/May-2016[11/5/2016 4:26:13 PM] May 2016 I bighominstitute radio -collared ewe and found a group of sheep, which of course was the highlight of the hike! We will continue our member hikes this summer; please contact us if you're interested in an early morning hike to look for sheep 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Membership starts at just $25/year and is tax-deductible. Space is limited, no dogs. Update on Released Ewe In early April, we released an adult ewe from Bighorn Institute's captive herd into the northern Santa Rosa Mountains. She continues to do well and has now been in the wild for two months. She must survive in the wild for at least 4 months to be considered a successful release. We are thrilled to see her adapting so well to her new environment and will continue to track her daily. W http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/05/31/May-2016[11/5/2016 4:26:13 PM] May 2016 I bighominstitute Log Your Sheep Sightings! We want to know where you're seeing sheep! We've started a citizen science project on Naturalist where hikers can log their sheep sightings with Bighorn Institute. This helps us keep track of the local herds and also gives others an idea where the sheep are. There's been a group of sheep near the Art Smith Trail recently as well as around the South Lykken Trail. We've seen postings on Facebook, but hope folks will join us in this project! Click on the photo for details. F r f 0 Comments x _- I3igJry3rrr luarir:rrrr. NEW Citizen Science program! ............................................................................................. "ova you i<OR hgh000 shcept Wo Wont tok- awut nr W011 an help �s keop vuk ui mrenaarg¢rea Peninsular o�nom snnpin the Couh6lla Val"ty rggglnf your ilgntings I 1. Download shr INa-.aliu app ar Mg unto iMorural l—V i. 5ign up rar this r—..— or IbJ In MAt an ex loini r®[cb. ft Tyllttur• slltRr. 6VOjIA O MUN449CVht 1. S,—h pmJretxB op..Ilgh.. Instltolc'� projoot A. loin glghom Ins[I[rzte's pmpn Ly clicking nn ^Joii thk pa j—' supper right eo ) 5. A0 ow—iom -!og your dawrt bighorn sheop sightings W ftd ngphpt. TQPVHkA• we wa1—k kow'artl tlor rA moray of thb maJc�t k - w1.y Icon•the endangered peninsularhlgi—sheep! THANKYOUI sN�raii� ihlaturaiist.org Sort by Oldest - http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/05/31/May-2016[11/5/2016 4:26:13 PM] We May 2016 1 bighominstitute Add a comment... Ll Facebook Comments Plugin 300 http://www.bighominstiitate.org/single-post/2016/05/31/May-2Ot6[11/5/2016 4:26:13 PM] June 2016 I bighominstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Dtartate June 2016 Radio Interview Earlier this month, Dr. Lori Kirshner of Animals Today Radio interviewed Bighorn Institute biologist, Aimee Byard, regarding the urban -bighorn issues in La Quinta. Rams have been coming down to the La Quinta golf courses since 2007, and ewes and Iambs since 2012. We know at least 12 bighorn sheep have died since 2012 from coming down to these urban areas to utilize artificial sources of food and water. In fact, in May, five Iambs died on the La Quinta golf courses during a two week period. The Institute has been outspoken about the need for a fence to keep the bighorn back in their natural habitat away from the perils of the urban area. Click on the photo to listen to the interview. Lambing Comes to a Close Lambing season for Peninsular bighorn sheep extends from January to June so this year's crop has arrived. Many Iambs were born this year, as often is the case, but survival is the measure of success. Summer is challenging for all of us here in the desert and the sheep are no exception, Follow Us 0 301 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/06/30/June-2016[l l/5/2016 4:25:15 PM] June 2016 I bighominstitute however, desert bighorn have many adaptations to thrive in this dry, harsh environment. If a Iamb can make it through its first summer, it has a good chance of living to adulthood and hopefully thriving for years. We documented approximately 65 Iambs born in our study area from Palm Springs to La Quinta. The Iambs range from 2-5 months of age and many have substantial horn growth. Lambs are weaned around 5 months of age, but will stay with their mother for the first year of life. Vital home range information is passed down to Iambs during this time so they learn where to go for food, water and shelter. The Iambs in the northern Santa Rosa and San Jacinto's look good, but the ones utilizing the golf courses in La Quinta have been sick and may not make it. In fact, five Iambs died on La Quinta golf courses just this year. We continue to watch that herd closely. Water Source Cleanup In mid -June, we cleared out the overgrown, invasive vegetation surrounding one of the man-made water sources in the northern Santa Rosa Mountains. Overgrown vegetation can block the bighorn's vision as they come in to drink, providing an ambush opportunity for predators. This is an important time of year to ensure water sources are full and clear with the temperatures rising. Bighorn sheep can go months without drinking water during the winter as they are adapted to utilize moisture from their diet of desert dwelling plants. During the summer, desert bighorn sheep can still go 3 days without drinking in temperatures over 100 degrees but will usually drink daily if water is available. There are no longer reliable, year-round natural water sources in the northern Santa Rosa Mountains, which makes these man-made water sources a necessity. The vegetation was removed by hand, which is a painstaking process in the heat, but it's worth it knowing it's helping the safety of the sheep. In fact, a group of 17 ewes and Iambs came down to drink shortly after the vegetation was 302 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/06/30/June-2016[l l/5/2016 4:25:15 PM] June 2016 I bighominstitute cleared. Released Ewe Adapting Well It's been three months since we released an adult ewe from our captive herd into the northern Santa Rosa Mountains and we are pleased to report that she looks good and is adapting well to her surroundings. We monitor her daily and observe her weekly. She has a penchant for being on top of the mountain, which puts us through our paces in this heat, but clearly, that's where she feels safest, so no complaints. We're just glad she's doing so well. Recent article: Keeping desert bighorn sheep safe from urban threats (click photo for story) 0 MAWS 0 Sort by Oldest http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/06/30/June-2016[i l/5/2016 4:25:15 PM] 303 June 2016 1 bighominstitute Add a comment... Ll Facebook Comments Plugin 304 http://www.bighominstiitate.org/single-post/2016/06/30/June-2Ot6[11/5/2016 4:25:15 PM] Jtdy 2016 1 bighominstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US WAYS YOU CAN HELP Donal* July 2o16 Research Projects Newsletter Articles Follow Us Monthly Updates Citizen Science Yearling Ewe in the Streets Community Activities On July 22nd, Bighorn Institute received a call from the police reporting a female bighorn on the streets of La Quinta on Jefferson Street adjacent to SilverRock golf resort. Institute biologists responded to the call and found a yearling ewe farther north at Avenue 49. With help from 4 Indio w police officers we made several attempts to haze the ewe back to the mountains, but the ewe was likely disoriented and determined to continue northeast away from the hills. With the extreme heat, we ended our efforts as the ewe was getting hot and was in Indian Palms Country Club in Indio, about 4 miles away from the nearest mountain. This is the farthest we have reported a bighorn sheep from the mountains in this range. Fortunately, that evening, the yearling ewe made her way back to the mountains as we had hoped. This was a dangerous situation for all involved and could have ended very differently. This yearling ewe utilizes the La Quinta golf course areas daily and is habituated, which is why she did not respond to hazing efforts like a wild bighorn. Her unnatural behavior significantly complicated the situation. This was the 3rd incident of sheep running the streets of La Quinta around SilverRock in a 3 day period and the police were called to all 3 events. We want to thank the La Quinta and Indio Police Departments for their much - needed assistance. A fence around SilverRock is needed to keep the sheep off of the busy streets adjacent to the golf course and keep motorists safe from a bighorn collision. orn 305 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/03/July-2016[11/5/2016 4:30:27 PM] July 2016 1 bighominstitute Rut Returns It's that time of year again when - } rams come out of a� the backcountry �* _ V, Y in search of ewes to breed. Since there is only 1 functioning radio - collared ram in our 3 study herds ' from Palm Springs to La Quinta, we see rams Ile �.yWINk _ s` v opportunistically when they are with the collared ewes or we happen upon them while hiking. It's an exciting time of year watching rams rut as they battle for breeding rights. The rut has just recently begun and typically extends from July — November for Peninsular bighorn sheep. We look forward to seeing rams regularly the rest of the year, which helps us to determine the current population levels. Sheep Attracted Near Road In Palm Springs, there is a water leak just feet away from Tramway Road in Chino Canyon. The water pipes appear to feed down to the Desert Palisades project, but the water leaks out of the pipes or pumping station and a pool of water has collected. This standing water is attracting bighorn sheep to drink a mere 20 meters away from busy Tramway Road. We first noticed this water leak in November 2015 and notified the wildlife agencies, but as of yet, nothing has been done to rectify the situation. We have received calls from concerned motorists as this water leak poses serious safety issues for both sheep and drivers. Please drive carefully on Tramway Road and let us know if you see sheep 760-346-7334. 306 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/03/July-2016[11/5/2016 4:30:27 PM] July 2016 1 bighominstitute GPS Collars GPS (Global Positioning System) radio- • collars are great in that they collect accurate locations on bighorn sheep - without any effort or interference from humans, but they certainly have their limitations and all brands are not created equally. GPS collars don't tell you how the animal is doing health -wise (are they in good condition), reproduction data (whether or not a ewe had a Iamb, its sex, and survival status), the population dynamics of the herd (age and sex of the population), etc. Along with these shortcomings, this month, we had 2 GPS collars fail in the same week: a ewe's collar went into mortality mode and a ram's collar quit beaconing. These collars were just put on 8 months ago and should have lasted several years. The ewe's collar that is stuck on mortality mode means that it is more difficult to determine when/if she actually dies and battery life will decrease. The ram's collar just quit beaconing, which means we can no longer track him and his collar is no longer collecting locations. We've come a long way in monitoring wildlife, but nothing beats "boots on the ground" and being out there physically observing bighorn as we do. It's arduous work, especially in summer, but worth the effort when you're helping with the recovery of an endangered species like the Peninsular bighorn. 0 M a 0 0 Comments Sort by oldest Add a comment... Ej Facebook Comments Plugin http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/03/July-2016[11/5/2016 4:30:27 PM] July 2016 1 bighorninstitute 308 http://www.bighominstiitate.org/single-post/2016/08/03/July-2016[11/5/2016 4:30:27 PM] August 2016 I bighorninstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Dom* August 2o16 Released Ewe a Success! ;, a a We are thrilled to sp, -" 4 - ,�.�. report that the ewe" �- we released in early April is finally considered a success since she siAY � ;y has been in the wild for at least 4 months! Bighorn '.a Institute has now released 127 bighorn sheep into,, the wild since sir - 1985, which has kept 2 local herds ., from disappearing. We r' have worked hard to see this ewe at ' J � � least once a week��+t ' post -release and•_ she has acclimated well to her new environment. She was recently seen with other sheep, including rams. We are hopeful that she will mate successfully this year and contribute to recovery with her offspring. The Rut is Underway Since mid to late - July, rams have been making their way out of the backcountry and are joining up with ewe groups. Follow Us 0 309 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/31/August-2016[11/5/2016 4:31:16 PM] August 2016 I bighorninstitute Peninsular bighorn xyu;'f� rams can weigh 2 200 pounds but may lose as much as 25% of their *•� - body weight traveling miles during the rut searching for ewes to breed. The rut, or breeding season, will continue through November and is certainly an exciting time of year. Rams have horn clashing contests to win breeding rights since dominant rams do most of the breeding. Bighorn sheep are polygamous so one ram will breed multiple ewes. While it's a thrill to watch the rams in all their glory, the true excitement of the season is the hope for new life the following spring. Rams Stuck in Morongo Mud Around the middle of August, Bighorn Institute received reports of three different yearling rams stuck in a mud hole in Big Morongo Preserve on three separate occasions. The rams appeared to have fallen into the mud as they attempted to drink from a small pool of water in a large mud hole. Thanks to concerned Morongo Preserve staff each bighorn was freed from the mud safely. This was a unique situation in which young rams made some bad decisions. They were likely away from the rest of the adults trying to take advantage of a risky water source. Hopefully, the stress they endured will prevent them from repeating this mistake. Meanwhile, Morongo staff is working with Bureau of Land Management to see about the possibility of a guzzler near the base of the mountain. We're glad there was a happy 310 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/31/August-2016[I 1/5/2016 4:31:16 PM] August 2016 I bighorninstitute ending, thanks to Big Morongo Preserve staff. Membership Hike Summer is coming to a close and the days will be cooling down so we will resume our monthly hikes for members in September. These special hikes feature one of our biologists taking a limited number of members out to look for bighorn sheep. Our next Bighorn Hike for Members will be Friday September 9th at 8:00am and we'd love to have you join us. Membership starts at just $25/year and is completely tax- deductible. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Save the Date: 2016 Fundraiser Bighorn Institute's Annual Party and Golf Classic will take place November 20th & 21 st. This year's entire event will take place at the exclusive Stone Eagle Golf Club. With their newly built Aerie restaurant, this venue is sure to wow with amazing views of our beautiful Santa Rosa Mountains. Please mark your calendars and look for invitations by early October. Auction Items Needed Do you have sports tickets, a condo, a boat, or any other exciting items you would consider donating to our annual fundraiser? We're always looking for fun and exciting new auction items for our Annual Party live and silent auctions. Don't have a "big" item but would like 311 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/31/August-2016[11/5/2016 4:31:16 PM] August 2016 I bighorninstitute to help? x. r Fantastic! We'd love to include your gift; all donated items are completely tax-deductible. The Institute's 2016 Annual Party and Golf Classic will take place November 20th & 21 st and supports our conservation efforts for the endangered Peninsular bighorn sheep. Please help us make this year's event a huge success for the sheep! To donate please call 760-346-7334. 0 M-Wts 0 Sort by Oldest Add a comment... El Facebook Comments Plugin 312 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/08/31/August-2016[11/5/2016 4:31:16 PM] September 2016 I bighominstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Drarlaj* September 2016 Annual Fundraiser Bighorn Institute 29t6 Annual Part q anJ GcA Classic :• STONF- tAGLr- cwem6er Zo - 211 zo16 Bighorn Institute's 2016 Annual Party and 29th Annual Golf Classic will be November 20th & 21st, and we hope you will join us! This year, the entire event will take place at Stone Eagle, a stunning venue set in the Santa Rosa foothills. Annual Party festivities include great food and drinks, and live and silent auctions at The Aerie, a brand new luxury restaurant with breathtaking views! Don't miss this special opportunity to support the sheep and see Stone Eagle; tickets are $400/couple. Monday's golf tournament will be hosted once again by golf legend and putting guru, Dave Stockton. Dave and friends will provide a professional's clinic with tips that are sure to improve your game! Golf is $950/player and includes 2 tickets to the Annual Party. Visit our Follow Us 0 website for details http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O9/3O/September-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:02 PM] 313 September 2016 I bighominstitute www.bighorninstitute.org We need auction items and all gifts are completely tax-deductible! Large or small donations are welcome; everything helps! Please help us make this year's event a huge success for the sheep! To donate, please call 760-346-7334. Wild Bighorn Update Bighorn Institute monitors bighorn sheep from Palm Springs to La Quinta. Overall, these herds are doing well, especially in the mountains around Rancho Mirage and Palm Springs. Most of the Iambs are 6-8 months old and are now weaned. Rams' raucous rutting behaviors have broken up ewe and Iamb groups with some Iambs apparently seeking ewes with fewer disruptions. We've seen several recent groups of sheep with a skewed number of Iambs per ewes. With rams roaming miles in search of ewes to breed, these Iambs will surely not have solace for long no matter who they choose to live with. The rut is now in full swing so we'll continue to follow the sheep, document their health and behavior and marvel at their majesty. Here is a short news story on our fieldwork on KESQ: http://www. kesq.com/news/tracking-bighorn-sheep-with-the-bighorn-institute/99653662 Community Outreach Bighorn Institute gave two talks this month, one to the Palm Springs Rotary Club and the other to the Rancho Mirage Rotary Club. We enjoyed meeting 314 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O9/3O/September-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:02 PM] September 2016 I bighominstitute x with these local 1� clubs and thank q .+a them for inviting t , us to speak to them about the endangered Peninsular bighorn t sheep and Bighorn Institute's •F, j ,�i conservation efforts. Education is an important part of our mission, so if you would like us to give a presentation at one of your events, please call 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Membership Hike We resumed our monthly membership hikes in September after a brief summer hiatus. We hiked with a great group of members in Chino Canyon in Palm Springs and had a fantastic time finding sheep! If you are interested in a unique learning experience with a chance at seeing wild sheep then a membership hike is the perfect, experience for you! Our next hike will be Monday October 10th at 8:OOam. Membership starts at just $25/year and is completely tax-deductible. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. 315 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O9/3O/September-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:02 PM] September 2016 I bighominstitute Sheep hit on Hwy 74 September was a tough month for bighorn crossing Highway 74 south of Palm Desert as three of them were hit and killed by a ' cars, two rams y ' and a Iamb. We ;,. have been '3 working with s� �, x .•vim :_ Caltrans and the wildlife agencies to get more t"4 = warning signs and Caltrans has finally agreed to install two yellow beacon signs on Highway 74. We feel these signs will be a tremendous help alerting motorists to the presence of sheep on this treacherous road. We'll let you know when the signs are installed, but in the meantime, please use extra caution driving Highway 74. Update La Quinta Fence There has been little to no progress toward the installation of a barrier or fence in La Quinta to keep bighorn from coming down to the golf courses and urban areas, despite the wildlife agencies mandating that a fence be completed by February 2016. As a result, the Center for Biological Diversity and Sierra Club have issued a 60 day notice of intent to sue the state and federal wildlife agencies, City of La Quinta and Coachella Valley Conservation Commission for failing to protect the endangered 316 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O9/3O/September-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:02 PM] September 2016 I bighominstitute Peninsular bighorn in La Quinta. Here is a copy of the notice as well as recent news stories: Press Release: Legal Challenge Pursued Over Failure to Protect Endangered Peninsular Bighorn Sheep http://www.biologicaldiversity.org/news/press releases/2016/peninsular-bighorn-sheep- 09-27-2016.html http://www.desertsun.com/story/news/environment/20l6/O9/27/bighorn-sheep keep- wandering-onto-golf-courses-now-activists-plan-sue-demand-fence/91196258/ http://www. pe.com/articles/bighorn-814337-conservation-fish.html 0 Mn jWts o Sort by Oldest , Add a comment... Ej Facebook Comments Plugh 317 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/20l6/O9/3O/September-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:02 PM] October 2016 I bighorninstitute Bighorn Institute HOME ABOUT US PROJECTS WAYS YOU CAN HELP Dom* October 2o16 Ram Movements During the rut, or breeding season, rams will travel miles in search of ewes to breed. They can lose as much as 25% of their body weight with this increased activity. Most of the rams are unmarked, but many have distinguishable horn characteristics allowing us to tell the difference between individuals. We documented an interesting ram movement this October. A ram known to inhabit Bear Creek Canyon in the La Quinta area was observed as far north as Magnesia Canyon around Rancho Mirage this year. That's approximately 9 miles, as the crow flies and involves crossing Hwy 74! This kind of ram movement is important to keep gene flow moving and the bighorn population healthy. Helicopter Survey The California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) will conduct a range - wide survey of bighorn sheep in the Peninsular Ranges in Follow Us 0 318 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/10/31/October-2016[11/5/2016 4:32:39 PM] October 2016 I bighorninstitute D B ghorn Institute Elm November. While these surveys are S usually biennial it sx°,r� has been 6 years ,e+, since one has , y been conducted due to the lack of15 , µsr' ti a helicopter ati, contract. This survey will allow CDFW to determine the current population of bighorn sheep in the range (the mountains from Palm Springs to Mexico). The last survey was in 2010 and estimated 950 Peninsular bighorn. Population and demography data are vital to the management of an endangered species and we look forward to the current survey results. Member Hike Our membership hike in October �. a • s �; . _ was another wonderful success S as all of our hikers - saw 5 sheep! We were able to track ,. one of the ewes that wears a GPS •`.'! `� 'r <:a s^, ` Via;= collar so the hike 14 had some extra excitement. Our next Member Hike will be Friday November 11th at w 8:00am. We will �� e �,• likely hike Carrizo or Dead Indian a •nw �:4 4 Canyons as they are only open from October through December to protect the sheep. Space is limited, no dogs, and you must RSVP for this first come first served hike. To sign up or for more information, please call us at 760-346-7334 or email us at bi@bighorninstitute.org. Have You Seen Sheep? Bighorn Institute http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/10/31/October-2016[I1/5/2016 4:32:39 PM] 319 October 2016 I bighorninstitute monitors bighorn from Palm Springs to La Quinta, but most of the sheep are not radio - collared. This is a vast area for our few biologists so we need your help! If you're out hiking and see bighorn sheep, please log your sightings in Bighorn Institute's project in Naturalist. It's free, it's easy and it will certainly help us keep better track of the herds. As we mentioned previously, many bighorn have distinguishable horn characteristics allowing us to identify individuals, but we are also looking for sightings on marked sheep since some have collars that no longer work. Please click on the photo for details on how to log your sheep sightings or visit our website: www.bighorninstitute.org/inaturalist-project Upcoming Fundraiser November 20 &21 Our Annual Party and Golf Classic are fast _sue. approaching and we hope you will join us! You don't want to miss this amazing event at Stone Eagle Golf Club in Palm Desert. Sunday's Annual Party festivities include live and silent auctions, great food and drinks and more at the brand new, beautiful Aerie restaurant! Monday's Golf Classic includes a professional's clinic, great tee prizes, breakfast, lunch and awards following play. For more information, please call 760-346-7334 or visit our website: www.bighorninstitute.org/fundraisers 320 http://www.bighominstitute.org/single-post/2016/10/31/October-2016[I1/5/2016 4:32:39 PM] October 2016 1 bighorninstitute 0 Comments F_rI . •uu-a 9 Facebook Comments Plugin Sort by � Oldest http://www.bighominstiitate.org/single-post/2016/10/31/October-2Ot6[11/5/2016 4:32:39 PM] 321 322 Exhibit 3: Letter from US Fish and Wildlife and California Department of Fish and Wildlife dated February 28, 2014 323 u.y- U.S_ Fish and Wildlife Service FLSId 2 ypiy71744k'k`. 8tREV � Palm Springs Fish and Wildlife Office if— ,r 777 East Tahquitz Canyon Way, Suite 208 "- Palm Springs, California 92262 760-322-2070 FAX 760-322-4648 In Reply ReferTo: FWS-CDFW-FKI V-09B0023-13TA0160 Mr. Tom Kirk ATTACHMENT 1 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Inland Deserts Region 78078 Country Club Drive, Suite 109 Bermuda Dunes, California 92203 760-200-9158 FAX 760-200-9358 Executive Director Coachella Valley Conservation Commission 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200 Palm Desert, California 92260 RLCEIVED Mr. Frank J. Spevacek City Manager City of La Quinta P.G. Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92247 MIAs, 0 3 2014 CITY OF LA QUINTA CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE FEB 2 S 2014 0 [V �q /I �7 V Subject: Notification that Peninsular Bighorn Sheep (Dvis canadensis nelsoni) are using artificial sources of food in unfenced urban areas in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California Dear Messrs. Kirk and Spevacek: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service or USFWS) and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (Department; formerly California Department of Fish and Game or CDFG), jointly referred to as the Wildlife Agencies, provide this notice to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC) and the City of La Quinta (City or Local Permittee) to express our concerns regarding urban -related impacts to the Peninsular Ranges Distinct Population Segment of Nelson bighorn sheep (Peninsular bighorn sheep, Qvis canadensis nelsoni), a federally endangered species and a State endangered and fully protected species. CVCC and the City are permittees under the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Conservation Plan (CVMSHCPINCCP) through Federal Fish and Wildlife Permit TE104604-0 and State of California NCCP Permit 2835-2008-001-06. Members of the public, including the Bighorn Institute of Palm Desert, California, have informed us that Peninsular bighorn sheep are regularly observed grazing within several golf resorts in the La Quinta area, including SilverRock Resort, PGA West, and The Quarry at La Quinta. These developments are located at the wildland-urban interface along the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains in La Quinta, adjacent to Peninsular bighorn sheep habitat in the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area of the CVMSHCP/NCCP. The Bighorn Institute has obtained photographic documentation of Peninsular bighorn sheep on these properties, and Peninsular bighorn sheep have been seen on the PGA West golf course during various televised events (see Enclosure 1), including the recently televised Humana Challenge tournament in January 2014. 324 Mr. Torn Kirk(FWS-CDF'W-ERIV-09B0023-13TA0160) 2 We are concerned -that rains, ewes, and lambs will continue to be attracted to forage, and possibly water sources, at golf resorts throughout the year, where they are at risk of injury and death from drowning in canals and swiru ping pools, toxic plant poisoning, vehicle strikes, the effects of ingesting intestinal parasites present among watered lawns and grasses, and other potential urban -related hazards. The death of three bighorn rams within urbanized areas of the City occurred during the summers of 2012 and 2013. One rani died of acute Nerium oleander poisoning on the grounds of PGA. West; the others were found drowned in the concrete -lined Coachella Canal, one in the vicinity of Madison Street and 52nd Avenue in La Quinta, and the other in the vicinity of Lake Cahuilla. According to Section 8.2A.1, itein 14, of the CV MSHCPINCCP: If the LISFWS or CDFG provides written notice to the CVCC or Local Perrnittee that Peninsular bighorn sheep are using artificial sources of food or water in unfenced areas of existing urban Development within or near a Conservation Area, the CVCC (unless otherwise agreed to by the applicable Local Pennittee) shall cause to be constructed a barrier to sheep access to cure the problem within 2 years of such notice. The location of this barrier (i.e., an 8-foot fence or functional equivalent) shall be determined by CVCC based oxr its ability to obtain permission/access to the necessary lands, if placement of a barrier must occur on other public lands (e.g., BLM [Bureau of Land Management], CDFG), CVCC will coordinate with these other agencies as appropriate. The.Service first approached CVCC on this issue on. May 30, 2012, at a CVMSHCP£NCCP Coordination Meeting at the Coachella Valley Association of Governments office in Palm Des6rt (see,Enclosure 2). Representatives of the Wildlife Agencies and CVCC subsequently met at the City -owned SilverRock Resort on June 12, 2012, with representatives of the City and Landmark Golf Management, which manages SilverRock resort for the City. Representatives of CVCC and the Wildlife Agencies met again to discuss the issue on August 20, 2012, at the Service's Palm Springs office. These parties and representatives of the Bighorn Institute nret again at SilverRock Resort on September 11, 2012, and at PGA West on July 26, 2013. Representatives of the Wildlife Agencies, CVCC, and the City met at the City of La Quinta Civic Center on January 9, 2014. In addition, the Service has continued to remind CVCC inforinally at CVMSHCPNCCP Coordination Meetings that Peninsular bighorn sheep were continuing to use the above sites for forage. Thus, we are formally providing written notice to you that Peninsular bighorn sheep are using the above mentioned locations for forage, and possibly water, at the urban-wildland interface on the edge of a CVMSHCP/NCCP conservation area. The 2-year clock for CVCC and potentially the City to construct a barrier to Peninsular bighorn sheep access at the La Quinta golf courses named above begins on the date of this letter. Although the CVMSHCP identifies fencing or a functional equivalent as a sheep barrier, it is well documented that adequate fencing will keep Peninsular bighorn sheep away from inappropriate forage and 325 Mr. Tom Kirk (FWS-CDFW-ERIV-09BM3-13TA0160) 3 water sources on golf resort properties, and will reduce the opportunities for Peninsular bighorn sheep to wander farther into the urban environment. In particular, we note the success of the Peninsular bighorn sheep fence built by the City of Rancho Mirage in 2002 in reducing Peninsular bighorn sheep mortalities in that area. Before the fence was constructed, the Bighorn Institute had documented 15 Peninsular bighorn sheep deaths in urbanized areas along California Highway 111. With the fence in place and maintained by the City of Rancho Mirage, no Peninsular bighorn sheep have peris€► A in that area from urban -related causes. We are not aware of any f metional equivalents to fencing at this time. Unless a functiand equivalent of fencing can be dmonstratedto be effective, we expect CVCC and the City to meet the requirements identified in 92.4.1, item 14, of the CVMSHCPINCCP within 2 years. We request CVCC and the City to involve the Wildlife Agencies in planning the location and type of fencing to be bWlt, and regularly inform us of progress toward irnpkmentatiom Accordingly, within. 6 months of the date of this letter, please provide the Wildlife Agencies with a letter -report of actions taken to notify and work with the golf resort ownerslmA�ers to plan fence construction, including a preliminary map of fence locations, provisions for developing any CEQA analysis that may be regiured, and a timeline for construction. If you have questions, please contact Jan ess McBride of the Service at 760-3222074 or Heather Pert of dm Department at 858-395-9692. Kennon A. Corey Assist&W Field Supervisor U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Enclosures Siincerely, David Elms Acting Regional Manager, Inland deserts Region California DeparfiZent of Fish and Wildlife 326 Exhibit 4: 60 Day Notice of Intent to Sue 327 CEO CENTER for BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY #71�_ VIA CERTIFIED MAIL, RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED; AND ELECTRONIC MAIL September 27, 2016 Paul Souza, Regional Director U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 8 - Pacific Southwest Region 2800 Cottage Way, Room W-2606 Sacramento, CA 95825 Email: paul_souzakfws.gov Sally Jewell, Secretary Department of the Interior 1849 C Street, N.W. Washington DC 20240 Email: Secretary iewellkios.doi.gov Charlton H. Bonham Director, Cal. Dept of Fish & Wildlife 1416 9th Street, 12th Floor, Sacramento, CA 95814 Email: directorkwildlife.ca. oo Tom Kirk, Executive Director Coachella Valley Conservation Commission 73710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 200 Palm Desert, California 92260 Phone: (760) 346-1127 Email: tkirkkcva�_.org City of La Quinta c/o City Clerk Susan Maysels 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Email: sma. slss&la-quinta.org Sixty -Day Notice of Intent to Sue the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Coachella Valley Conservation Commission, California Department of Fish and Wildlife and City of La Quinta Pursuant to the Endangered Species Act For Failure to Implement The Terms and Conditions of Biological Opinion for the Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP Incidental Take Permit, NCCP Permit and Implementing Agreement; Notice of Violation of the MSHCP, the Incidental Take Permit No. TE104604-0, and the NCCP Permit No. 2835-2008-001-06; and Notice of Violation of California's Fully Protected Mammal Act [California Fish and Game Code §47001. This letter is to provide you with notice that the Center for Biological Diversity ("Center") and Sierra Club intend to file suit, pursuant to the citizen suit provision of the Endangered Species Act ("ESA"), 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g), to challenge the failure to comply with and implement the mandatory terms and conditions of the biological opinion for the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan ("MSHCP"), Incidental Take Permit ("ITP") and the Implementing Agreement ("IA"). Arizona • California • Nevada • New Mexico • Alaska • Oregon • Montana • Illinois • Minnesota • Vermont • Washington, DC www.BiologicalDiversity.org 328 This letter also provides the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ("Service"), California Department of Fish and Wildlife ("Department"), the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission ("CVCC") and City of La Quinta ("La Quinta") with Notice of violations of the MSHCP, ITP, biological opinion, and California's Fully Protected Mammal Act. In light of the violations detailed herein, the Service and Department may immediately need to suspend or revoke the permit pursuant to 50 C.F.R §§13.27-13.29, California Fish and Game Code §2820 and the terms of the Implementing Agreement Section 23.5. In the alternative, in accordance with Section 23.3 of the Implementing Agreement, the Service and Department may seek injunctive and temporary relief to compel action by CVCC and La Quinta 1 These violations are particularly concerning to the Center and Sierra Club as the Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP is a very well designed plan. We urge the Service and Department to take action immediately to enforce the MSHCP, revoke or suspend the ITP issued to CVCC and La Quinta, and to enjoin the CVCC and La Quinta to construct a fence immediately. Fence construction should be completed before the next lambing season to protect Peninsular bighorn sheep populations that are at risk due to the failure of the CVCC and La Quinta to fully implement the terms of the MSHCP. I. Identity of the Organizations Giving Notice: The name, address, and phone number of the organizations giving notice of intent to sue under the ESA are: Center for Biological Diversity c/o Lisa Belenky, Senior Attorney 1212 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 ofc (510) 844-7107 fax (510) 844-7150 II. Counsel for the parties giving notice: Lisa T. Belenky, Senior Attorney Center for Biological Diversity 1212 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 ofc (510) 844-7107 fax (510) 844-7150 lbelenkykbiolo gicaldiversity. org III. Requirements of the ESA The Sierra Club 2101 Webster Street, Suite 1300 Oakland, CA 94612 (415) 977-5500 D. Wayne Brechtel, Attorney at Law 462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 100 Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 755-6604 dwbkwordenwilliams.com Section 9 of the ESA and its implementing regulations prohibit the unauthorized "take" of listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1); 16 U.S.C. § 1533(d); 50 C.F.R. § 17.31. "Take" is 1 IA at sec. 23.3 ("Injunctive and Temporary Relief. The Parties acknowledge that the Covered Species are unique and that their loss as species would result in irreparable damage to the environment and therefore injunctive and temporary relief may be appropriate to ensure compliance with the terms of this Agreement.") Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 329 September 27, 2016 defined broadly to include harming, harassing, trapping, capturing, wounding or killing a protected species either directly or by degrading its habitat. See 16 U.S.C. § 1532(19). Taking that is in compliance with the terms and conditions specified in a biological opinion is not considered a prohibited taking under Section 9 of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(o)(2). These protections are intended to ensure the conservation of listed species including the endangered Peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsoni). In order to obtain an Incidental Take Permit under the ESA Section 10 for incidental harm to listed species, a habitat conservation plan ("HCP") is needed. HCPs are designed to offset any harmful effects the proposed activity might have on the species in accordance with § 10 of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1539. The ESA has strict requirements for consultation and implementation of Incidental Take Permits that cannot be violated. For a habitat conservation plan, the plan, implementing agreement, and incidental take permit are analyzed and approved as a complete package, if any conservation and management measures fall short then the conclusions in the BO are invalid, consultation must be reinitiated and the ITP should be suspended or revoked. See 50 C.F.R. § § 13.27 ("may be suspended at any time if the permittee is not in compliance with the conditions of the permit"), § 13.28 (permit revocation). Section 7 of the ESA requires all federal agencies to ensure that any action authorized, funded, or carried out by the agency is not likely to (1) jeopardize the continued existence of any threatened or endangered species or (2) result in the destruction or adverse modification of the critical habitat of such species. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2). For each federal action, the action agency must request from FWS whether any listed or proposed species may be present in the area of the agency action. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 402.12. If listed or proposed species may be present, the federal agency must prepare a "biological assessment" to determine whether the listed species may be affected by the proposed action. Id. The biological assessment must generally be completed within 180 days. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. § 402.12(i). If the federal agency, including the FWS, determines that its proposed action may affect any listed species or critical habitat, the agency must engage in formal consultation with FWS. 50 C.F.R. § 402.14. To complete formal consultation when an HCP is proposed to be issued, FWS must provide itself with a "biological opinion" explaining how the proposed action will affect the listed species or habitat. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b); 50 C.F.R. § 402.14. If FWS concludes that the proposed action "will jeopardize the continued existence" of a listed species, the biological opinion must outline "reasonable and prudent alternatives." 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b)(3)(A). If the biological opinion concludes that the action is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of a listed species, and will not result in the destruction or adverse modification of critical habitat, FWS must provide an "incidental take statement," specifying the amount or extent of such incidental taking on the listed species, any "reasonable and prudent measures" that FWS considers necessary or appropriate to minimize such impact, and setting forth the "terms and conditions" that must be complied with to implement those measures. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b)(4); 50 C.F.R. § 402.14(i). In order to monitor the impacts of incidental take, the action agency must monitor and report the impact of its action on the listed species to FWS as specified in the incidental take statement. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b)(4); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.14(i)(1)(iv), 402.14(i)(3). If during the Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 336 September 27, 2016 course of the action the amount or extent of incidental taking is exceeded, the federal agency, here FWS, must reinitiate consultation with FWS immediately. 50 C.F.R. § 401.14(i)(4). The re -initiation of formal consultation is required and must be requested by the action agency or FWS if (1) the amount or extent of taking specified in the incidental take statement is exceeded; (2) new information reveals effects of the action that may affect listed species or critical habitat in a manner or to an extent not previously considered; (3) the action is modified in a manner that causes an effect to the listed species or critical habitat that was not considered in the biological opinion; or (4) a new species is listed or critical habitat designated that may be affected by the identified action. 50 C.F.R. § 402.16. After the initiation or re -initiation of consultation, the action agency is prohibited from making any irreversible or irretrievable commitment of resources with respect to the agency action which may foreclose the formulation or implementation of any reasonable and prudent alternative measures. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(d). IV. Requirement of California's Fully Protected Mammal Act Under California statutes, certain species are afforded special protection. One such species is the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. California Fish and Game Code section 4700 states: (a) (1) Except as provided in this section, Section 2081.7, or Section 2835, a fully protected mammal may not be taken or possessed at any time. No provision of this code or any other law shall be construed to authorize the issuance of a permit or license to take a fully protected mammal, and no permit or license previously issued shall have any force or effect for that purpose. However, the department may authorize the taking of a fully protected mammal for necessary scientific research, including efforts to recover fully protected, threatened, or endangered species. (2) As used in this subdivision, "scientific research" does not include an action taken as part of specified mitigation for a project, as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources Code. (3) A legally imported fully protected mammal may be possessed under a permit issued by the department. (b) The following are fully protected mammals: (2) Bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), except Nelson bighorn sheep (subspecies Ovis canadensis nelsoni) as provided by subdivision (b) of Section 4902. In order to comply with the provisions of California Fish and Game Code section 4700, the MSHCP, the IA and the ITP were all drafted with the understanding that no death of bighorn sheep was to be authorized. Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 331 September 27, 2016 V. The MSHCP, Biological Opinion, ITP, NCCP Permit, and IA The MSHCP, ITP, and IA went into effect in 2008 when the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service issued the final permit for the CVMSHCP on October 1, 2008. In accordance with the ESA, the Fish and Wildlife Service also adopted a biological opinion (`BO") in conjunction with the ITP. The California Department of Fish and Game had already issued the Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) Permit for the CVMSHCP on September 9, 2008. The Coachella Valley MSHCP covers a broad area and a long list of species. The MSHCP, related Implementing Agreement, and Permits provide "take" authorization for extensive development within the plan area that affects numerous endangered and threatened species. Importantly, with regard to Peninsular bighorn sheep, the MSHCP required the CVCC and the signatory agencies to implement conservation measures to protect and recover Peninsular bighorn sheep populations and to prevent of "take" of bighorn sheep. The measures specifically did not allow for "take" because Bighorn Sheep are fully protected mammals under California law. (Cal. Fish and Game Code § 4700.) With respect to Peninsular bighorn sheep, the MSHCP states the following: Although fully protected species are included in the list of Covered Species, Take of these species is not authorized in the NCCP Permit and is prohibited by California Fish and Game Code. The following species in the MSHCP are fully protected under the California Fish and Game Code: 1) Peninsular Bighorn Sheep... (MSHCP, page 7-1.) The Peninsular bighorn sheep is a California Fully Protected Species and as used with respect to PBS, Take Authorization refers only to disturbance of habitat. The MSHCP does not permit Take of an individual PBS. All Covered Activities of the Plan must avoid actions in violation f Section 4700 of the Fish and Game Code that addresses Fully Protected Species (See IA Section 15.5) (MSHCP, Section 7.3.3.2, Page 7-53, emphasis added.) Consistent with the statements within the MSHCP, the Implementing Agreement included the following provision at section 15.5: 15.5 Fully Protected Species. The following Covered Species listed in the MSHCP are fully protected under California Fish and Game Code sections 3511 and 4700: 1) Peninsular bighorn sheep; Take of these species is prohibited under the California Fish and Game Code except as specifically provided in section 2081.7 of that Code. CDFG acknowledges and agrees that if the measures set forth in the MSHCP are fully complied with, the Covered Activities are not likely to result in Take of fully Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 335 September 27, 2016 protected species, except by CVWD. If CDFG determines that such measures are not adequate to prevent Take of one of the Fully Protected Species, CDFG shall notify the CVCC, USFWS and other affected Permittees in writing of such discovery and propose new, additional, or different Conservation measures that it believes are necessary to avoid Take of these species. The affected Permittees shall implement measures proposed by CDFG or such other measures agreed to by the Parties as adequate to avoid Take of Fully Protected Species... The MSHCP identifies various Conservation Areas and specifies requirements for each. For Unit 6, which is near La Quinta, the measures include provisions to restrict bighorn sheep use of existing urban development nearby. Among the required measures is MSHCP 8.2.4.1 item 14, which states: 14. If the USFWS or CDFG provides written notice to the CVCC or Local Permittee that Peninsular bighorn sheep are using artificial sources of food or water in unfenced areas of existing urban Development within or near a Conservation Area, the CVCC (unless otherwise agreed to by the applicable Local Permittee) shall cause to be constructed a barrier to sheep access to cure the problem within 2 years of such notice. The location of this barrier (i.e., an 8-foot fence or functional equivalent) shall be determined by CVCC based on its ability to obtain permission/access to the necessary lands. If placement of a barrier must occur on other public lands (e.g., BLM, CDFG), CVCC will coordinate with these other agencies as appropriate. (Emphasis added.) Unfortunately, since at least 2012, not only have sheep been using unfenced areas of existing urban Development by Unit 6, but there have been twelve documented deaths of Peninsular bighorn sheep within urbanized areas in and near La Quinta. Developments within the City of La Quinta that are causing bighorn sheep death include The Quarry, Lake Cahuilla County Park, PGA West, SilverRock, and The Tradition. In 2016, all of the sheep deaths were lambs under 6 months of age that contracted diseases, while numerous incidences have been documented of sheep entering urban areas, including running through traffic. This was exactly the kind of problem that Item 14 was created to address. Accordingly, a letter was sent by the Service and Department on February 28, 2014 invoking the provision of MSHCP 8.2.4.1, Item 14. As the Department's Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Annual Report 20142 explained regarding the San Jacinto Mountains (SJM), Northern Santa Rosa Mountains (NSRM), and Central Santa Rosa Mountains (CSRM) areas: SJM, NSRM & CSRM: - Threats and concerns — habitat fragmentation, urban use, and human disturbance: Urban development within and adjacent to sheep habitat continue to be the main concern within these 3 regions. The BI [Bighorn Institute] has documented routine movement of sheep from the CSRM to the NSRM recovery regions across Highway 74 and sheep continue to be struck and 2 Available at hgps:Hnrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=97891 Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 339 September 27, 2016 killed on the this highway. Improved signage and warning devices may prevent accidents that can potentially harm both sheep and humans. CSRM rams have been documented foraging on golf courses in La Quinta since 2007: in 2012, both ewes and lambs were documented foraging on golf courses as well. Golf cart bridges across the Coachella Canal allow sheep easy access to grasses and oleander bushes at the golf courses and surrounding homes. In 2014, BI documented an increase in sheep use of urban areas with 12 separate reported incidents of bighorn sheep, including lambs, walking in the streets of La Quinta adjacent to the SilverRock and PGA West golf courses. The use of these areas change natural foraging patterns of sheep and expose them to a variety of risks associated with use of the urban landscape such as increased predation, vehicle strikes, entanglement, drowning, increased parasite loads, and exposure to toxins. Since 2012, three rams have drowned in the Coachella Canal, one ram was rescued, and a fourth ram died from oleander poisoning. Construction of fences at the urban interface is identified as a site specific recovery action for the Santa Rosa Mountains south of Highway 74 in Section ILD.1.2 of the recovery plan. Construction of fencing to exclude bighorn sheep from golf courses and residential areas in La Quinta would be an important step toward preventing urban related mortalities and enhance efforts toward conservation of sheep in the CSRM. For example, the exclusion fence built in Rancho Mirage in 2002 has completely eliminated urban -related bighorn sheep deaths. On February 28, 2014, CDFW and the USFWS sent a joint notification letter to the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (CVCC) and the City of La Quinta stating that due to documented sheep use of artificial water and food sources in unfenced existing urban development within the City of La Quinta, and as required under the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan that installation of an exclusion barrier (i.e., 8-foot high fence) to cure the problem must take place within two years of notification. 2014 Report at 19-20 (emphasis added). The Department's Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report3 continued to raise these concerns and explained why fencing is critical and alternative measures are not feasible: CSRM rams have been documented foraging on golf courses in La Quinta since 2007; and in 2012, ewes and lambs began foraging at golf courses as well. Ewes and their lambs now forage at PGA West, SilverRock, or Tradition on a daily basis. Incidents of sheep walking on the streets and throughout residential neighborhoods in La Quinta continue to increase each year. Sheep use of the urban environment changes their natural foraging patterns and behavior and expose them to a variety of risks such as increased spread of diseases, vehicle strikes, entanglement, drowning, predation, increased parasite loads, and exposure to toxins. Since 2012, 3 rams and 1 lamb have drowned in the Coachella Canal, 1 ram was rescued from the canal, 1 ram died from oleander poisoning, and 1 ram was struck and killed on Jefferson Avenue. 3 Available at hgps:Hnrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=129531 Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 334 September 27, 2016 Disease is rapidly spread among sheep that concentrate within the golf course communities. In 2015, lambs on the golf course were observed with pneumonia and only 11 % of these lambs survived their first year (refer to sections on Respiratory Disease and Lamb Survival and Recruitment for details). Fencing at the urban interface is identified as a site specific recovery action for the Santa Rosa Mountains south of Highway 74 in Section II.D.1.2 of the recovery plan (USFWS 2000). Construction of fencing to exclude bighorn sheep from golf courses and residential areas in La Quinta would be an important step toward preventing urban related mortalities and enhance efforts toward conservation of sheep in the CSRM. For example, the exclusion fence built in Rancho Mirage in 2002 has completely eliminated urban -related bighorn sheep deaths. Other potential actions, such as the capture and removal of sheep from the golf course communities would not be feasible. Ewes teach their lambs where to obtain food and water and once a pattern of use (home range) is established it is maintained from one cohort to the next. Sheep are capable of traveling great distances over a short period of time and would easily find their way back to their original home range. Furthermore, because disease has been identified within the urban ewe group, removal of these sheep to another area would facilitate the spread of disease to other areas of the range. 2015 Report at 18 (emphasis added). Although CVCC and La Quinta began preparations in 2014 to construct the required fence, including seeking cost estimates, no construction of the fence has occurred to date. On February 25, 2016, CVCC issued a Notice of Preparation for an Environmental Impact Report, just a few days before the deadline, and the proposed project appears to be designed to lengthen the time it will take to construct this critical fencing rather than expedite it. In fact, no additional environmental review is needed before the fence can be constructed as it was already analyzed in the EIS/EIR for the CV MSHCP/NCCP and, accordingly, fencing was required as a mitigation measure in the approvals for several projects in this area including the Winchester Development/The Quarry and SilverRock Resort. The two-year deadline specified in Item 14 has now passed. Therefore, CVCC and La Quinta are in violation of the mandatory requirements of the MSHCP, BO, ITP and IA. CVCC has failed and refused to adequately "oversee the Monitoring Program for the Reserve Lands pursuant to Section 8" as detailed in the MSHCP at §6.1.6 and has failed to "cause to be constructed a barrier to sheep access to cure the problem within 2 years of such notice" as required in MSHCP at 8.2.4.1, Item 14. The FWS has failed to take action to suspend or revoke the permit, as required under Section 23.5 of the Implementing Agreement, Section 8 of the Biological Opinion, and Special Terms and Condition 12 of the Threatened and Endangered Species Permit. The Department has failed to suspend or revoke the permit in accordance with Section 23.5 of the Implementing Agreement and Section 8 of the NCCP Permit. Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 339 September 27, 2016 The conservation and management measures required in the MSHCP to benefit the affected species take place on both private and public lands managed by various participating agencies. La Quinta is signatory to the Implementing Agreement and is bound to carry out the conservation and management measures assigned to them under the MSHCP, BO, NCCP and IA. The structure of the MSHCP assigns certain tasks to the CVCC on behalf of the signatories. All of the conservation and management measures in the MSHCP are incorporated as mandatory terms and conditions of the BO. The BO states: All of the conservation and management measures in the MSHCP and accompanying agreements, together with the terms identified in the associated IA and the special permit terms and conditions, are hereby incorporated by reference as reasonable and prudent measures, and terms and conditions for this incidental take statement pursuant to 50 CFR 402.14(1). Such terms and conditions are non - discretionary and must be undertaken by the Applicants for the exemptions under section 10(a)(1)(B) and section 7(o)(2) of the Act to apply. If the Applicants fails to adhere to these terms and conditions, the protective coverage of the Permit and section 7(o)(2) may lapse. (BO at Section 6, page 186.) In addition, the BO Species Account contains the following statement regarding the required fencing at La Quinta: Sheep in the La Quinta area appear to have shown at least occasional attraction to urban settings which indicates that the potential for sheep use of urban areas exists beyond the northern Santa Rosa Mountains ewe group. As a result, the City of La Quinta has recognized the issue and mitigated potential adverse effects by requiring contingency fencing plans on several recent project approvals. In addition, the proponents of numerous other individual development projects recently approved through section 7 and/or CEQA review have agreed to either install appropriate barriers at the time of construction, or as a contingency strategy with pre -approved easements, funding, and responsible parties. Required Measure 114 emulates the contingency fencing plans developed by the City of La Quinta, and adequately addresses the concerns regarding urban sources of mortality. This Required Measure should benefit bighorn sheep when implemented. (BO, Appx. A Species Accounts page 624.) The ITP terms and conditions specify that the "authorization granted by this permit is subject to compliance with, and implementation of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP), and executed Implementing Agreement, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference." (ITP, Special Condition 2) 4 The reference to measure "I I" may have been a typo, as the statement is clearly referring to Measure 14 referenced above. Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 338 September 27, 2016 The NCCP permit at section 3.4 states: These findings are not merely informational. To the extent CDFG relies on implementation of particular measures to make a necessary finding under NCCP A, those measures constitute a binding set of obligations that take effect when CDFG approves the NCCP Permit for the HCP/NCCP. CDFG believes that all mitigation and conservation measures that it has relied on for purposes of its findings are separately required under the HCP/NCCP or the IA, or are express conditions of this NCCP Permit. Consequently CDFG does not anticipate that as a practical matter these findings, in and of themselves, will increase obligations of those operating under authority of this NCCP Permit. Section 6.2.2 of the NCCP Permit specifies that no take of Peninsular bighorn sheep is authorized, and Section 8 of the NCCP Permit states that the Permit is subject to suspension or termination by action of the Director of CDFG in accordance with the terms of Section 23.5 of the IA. The MSHCP as both a Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Communities Conservation Plan, was analyzed, adopted and approved as a complete package. If any conservation and management measures fall short, then the ITP and NCCP Permit are invalid and they must be suspended or revoked. VI. Violations of Law A. Permit Violations- ESA Violation of any permit issued under the Endangered Species Act constitutes a violation of the ESA, 16 U.S.C. § 1540(a), which can be enforced through the citizen suit provision of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1540(g). As detailed above, the permit conditions are not being met in material regard as to implementation of the MSHCP by the CVCC and La Quinta which have failed and refused to comply with permit conditions and the MSHCP requirements that it ensure the bighorn sheep barrier is constructed. Specifically, CVCC and La Quinta have failed to construct the barrier within 2 years of being notified by the Service and Department. This is a material violation of the MSHCP and the Implementing Agreement and, thereby, a violation of the ITP and NCCP. CVCC and FWS have failed to ensure that the needed conservation and management measures were undertaken, in violation of the permit, and FWS has failed to reinitiate consultation in violation of the ESA. B. Violations of Section 7 of the ESA; Failure to Comply With the Terms and Conditions of the BO and Failure to Reinitiate Consultation The FWS is violating the mandatory terms and conditions set forth in the biological opinion concerning the implementation of the MSHCP. FWS has also failed to reinitiate Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 319 September 27, 2016 consultation in light of information that the terms and conditions of the BO, ITP and NCCP Permit are not being met, in violation of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(b)(4); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.14(i)(1)(iv), 402.14(i)(4). Due to the failure to provide the conservation and management measures agreed to in the BO and ITP, the FWS has also failed to insure that development under the MSHCP does not result in take of Peninsular bighorn sheep, as required in the ITP. Through its failure to insure that the ITP take limit for Peninsular bighorn sheep has not been exceeded, the FWS is thereby failing to insure that the MSHCP and associated activities are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the Peninsular bighorn sheep populations. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2). The FWS has failed to timely reinitiate and complete the reinitiated consultation regarding the continued failure to implement the terms and conditions of the BO, MSHCP and IA by CVCC and La Quinta and the resulting impacts of development under the MSHCP on Peninsular bighorn sheep and its critical habitat in violation of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. §§ 1536(a)(2), 1536(b)(1)(A), 1536(c)(1); 50 C.F.R. §§ 402.12, 402.14(e), 402.14(i)(4), 402.16. By allowing, authorizing, or approving projects and activities to proceed within the MSHCP area that may affect Peninsular bighorn sheep, prior to the reinitiation of and completion of consultation, the FWS is violating the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2), (d); Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas, 30 F.3d 1050, 1056 (9th Cir. 1994). The continued approval and authorization of activities that may lead to take of Peninsular bighorn sheep under the MSHCP and ITP prior to the reinitiation and completion of consultation regarding the failure to fully implement conservation measures and terms and conditions of the BO and ITP, violates Section 7 the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(a)(2), (d); Pacific Rivers Council v. Thomas, 30 F.3d 1050, 1056 (9th Cir. 1994). C. Violations of Section 9 of the ESA The CVCC and La Quinta have failed to take steps required of them to protect the Peninsular bighorn sheep and ensure construction of the fencing. As a result, the CVCC has and La Quinta have failed to comply with the terms and conditions of the BO, ITP and IA by failing to implement a mandatory conservation measure under the MSHCP; therefore, the ITP may be suspended and any additional development actions that may result in "take" of Peninsular bighorn sheep under the MSHCP ITP are unauthorized and in violation of the ESA. Because FWS continues to allow CVCC and La Quinta to authorize, approve, and allow projects and activities under the ITP despite the violations of the terms and conditions of the MSHCP, BO, ITP and IA, the FWS is in ongoing violation of Section 9 of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1); 16 U.S.C. § 1536(d); 50 C.F.R. § 17.3l(a). D. Violation of California Fish and Game Code 2820 Through its failure to ensure that the NCCP Permit take limit for Peninsular bighorn sheep has not been exceeded, the Department is thereby failing to insure that the MSHCP and associated activities are not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of the Peninsular bighorn Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 31� September 27, 2016 sheep populations. The California Fish and Game Code allows for Department approval of NCCP Permits, but if the level of take specified in the terms of the NCCP permit are violated, then the Department shall suspend or revoke the permit. California Fish and Game Code section 2820(c) specifies that: c) If a plan participant does not maintain the proportionality between take and conservation measures specified in the implementation agreement and does not either cure the default within 45 days or enter into an agreement with the department within 45 days to expeditiously cure the default, the department shall suspend or revoke the permit, in whole or in part. (Emphasis added.) The language of the Code is mandatory, compelling the Department to take action. Since no take of bighorn sheep individuals was authorized, and sheep death has occurred, the proportionality between take and conservation measures has not been maintained. Because the Department continues to allow CVCC and La Quinta to authorize, approve, and allow projects and activities under the NCCP Permit despite the violations of the terms and conditions of the MSHCP and IA, the Department is in ongoing violation of California Fish and Game Code section 2820 by failing to suspend or revoke its NCCP permit. It should be noted that California Fish and Game Code authorizes immediate action in the form of injunctive relief pursuant to section2822.5 E. Violation of Fish and Game Code 4700 With limited exceptions, no take of Peninsular bighorn sheep can be authorized. Although the Department is now authorized under Fish and Game Code Section 28356 to allow the take of fully protected species whose conservation and management is provided for in a NCCP approved by the Department, that section was enacted after the Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP was issued. Moreover, the Department is only permitted to authorize take as part of a conservation measure, and is not authorized to permit any take as part of any urban development. (See Center for Biological Diversity v. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.4th 204; 195 Cal. Rptr.3d 247). VII. Conclusion For the above stated reasons, CVCC, La Quinta, Department, and FWS have violated and remain in ongoing violation of the terms of the MSHCP, ITP, NCCP Permit, and terms and 5 Cal. Fish & Game Code §2822 ("The department may seek injunctive relief against any plan participant, person, or entity to enforce this chapter.") 6 Cal. Fish & Game Code §2835 ("At the time of plan approval, the department may authorize by permit the taking of any covered species, including species designated as fully protected species pursuant to Sections 3511, 4700, 5050, or 5515, whose conservation and management is provided for in a natural community conservation plan approved by the department.") Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 31g September 27, 2016 conditions of the biological opinion; therefore, the incidental take permit and NCCP Permit are both invalid and may be suspended or revoked. FWS has violated and remains in ongoing violation of Section 9 of the ESA for allowing take to occur without a valid take permit or take statement, and FWS has also violated and remains in ongoing violation of section 7 of the ESA for failing to reinitiate consultation. The Department has violated §4700 and §2820 of the California Fish and Game Code for failing to suspend or revoke the NCCP Permit and allowing death of Peninsular bighorn sheep, a Fully Protected Mammal, to occur as a result of urban development. This notice letter was prepared based on good faith information and belief after reasonably diligent investigation. We hope that the responsible agencies will act immediately to correct these violations and construct the needed fence to protect the Peninsular bighorn sheep as required under the terms of the plan. If you believe that any of the foregoing is factually erroneous or inaccurate, please notify us promptly. Sincerely, Lisa T. Belenky, Senior Attorney Center for Biological Diversity 1212 Broadway, Suite 800 Oakland, CA 94612 ofc (510) 844-7107 fax (510) 844-7150 lbelenkygbiolo gicaldiversity. org D. Wayne Brechtel, Attorney at Law 462 Stevens Avenue, Suite 100 Solana Beach, CA 92075 (858) 755-6604 dwb@wordenwilliams.com CC: (via email) Ken Corey Assistant Field Supervisor U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service 777 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Ste. 208 Palm Springs, CA 92262 Email: Ken Coreykfws.gov Re: 60 Day Notice of Intent To Sue: Coachella Valley MSHCP/NCCP 346 September 27, 2016 Trusted Legal Services Since 1975 November 8, 2016 City Council City of La Quinta 78-495 Catle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Re: Appeal of October 25, 2016 Planning Commission Approval of Site Development Permit 2016-0OO5 - SilverRock Development, LLC Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council: This appeal is submitted on behalf of the Sierra Club and the Center for Biological Diversity ("Center"). The Sierra Club is a California non-profit corporation dedicated to the conservation and preservation of the nation's natural resources. The Sierra Club and its members utilize the natural, scenic and biological resources of the Coachella Valley and the City of La Quinta through their corporate and individual activities including scientific research, planning, education, and recreation. The Center is a non-profit environmental organization with more than one million members and online activists, including members Who Live in or visit the Coachella 'Valley and the City of La Ouinta. The Center uses science, policy and law to advocate for the conservation and recovery of species on the brink of extinction and the habitats they need to survive including the endangered bighorn sheep which will be affected by the proposed project. The legal issues are technical, but the crux of this appeal is straight -forward. The Site Development Permit at issue is part of a project that that is causing harm and death of Peninsular bighorn sheep because a promise to construct a fence to keep bighorn sheep out of harm's way has not been honored. The omission is inexcusable because the potential for bighorn sheep to enter the development site and suffer harm was identified when the project was first approved more than a decade ago, and the promise to construct a fence if needed was the foundation upon which ati. findings of no significant impacts to Areas of Practice Real Estate Estate Planning & Administration Business Land Use & Environmental Litigation Public Agency Attorneys 1).Wayne prechtel Kristen McBride Jason R. S€hingler Torner T. Gutman Tracy R. Richmond of Counsel D. Dwight Warden Re tired W. Scott Williams Retired Off ice 462 Stevens Avenue Suite 100 Solana Beach California 92075 (858) 755-6604 wordenwiltiarns.com 341 w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 2 bighorn sheep rest. The foundation has crumbled because the fence has not beer. constructed, and as a result, bighorn sheep are dying. The Sierra Club and Center urge the Council to do the right thing and overturn the Planning Commission's approval of the Site Development Permit (SDP) and direct that the fencing required to prevent further harm to Peninsular bighorn sheep be put into place now. The time for excuses has passed, and failure to overturn the Planning Commission approval and direct the immediate construction of a protective fence would subject the City to unnecessary liability for the fallowing violations of law: 1. Violation of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) for allowing take of Peninsular Bighorn Sheep and for failing to build a sheep barrier 2. Violation of previously issued City approvals for the project for failing to comply with the conditions requiring a sheep barrier 3. Violation of the California Environmental Quality ,Act (CEQA) for failing to supplement the environmental review due to changed circumstances and new evidence of significant impacts to Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 4, Violation of CEQA for failing to enforce mitigation measures that require a sheep barrier 5. Violation of the Fully Protected Mammal Act for allowing take of Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 6. Violation of both the State and Federal Endangered Species Acts for allowing take of Peninsular bighorn sheep 7. Violation of the public trust The following detailed comments are provided in support of this appeal. We have attached numerous documents, and have incorporated by reference other documents that can be found within the City's files. We ask that all documents cited in this appeal be made a part of the administrative record for this matter. 342 .w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 3 Evidence of Harm and Death of Reninsylar Bighorn Shee The original project approval, and its environmental review, occurred about fourteen years ago. Since that time, portions of the project have been developed, including a golf course. For several years, bighorn sheep have been entering the project site to access the golf course and surrounding areas. This has resulted in increased bighorn sheep illness and mortality, as summarized in the California Department of Fish and Wildlife's Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Update ("CDFW Annual Update"). The CDFW Annual Update notes that since at least 2007, sheep have been increasingly using unfenced areas of existing urban development, including 12 documented deaths of Peninsular bighorn sheep within urbanized areas in and near La Quinta, including the SilverRock Development. CSRM rams have been documented foraging on golf courses in La Quinta since 2007; and in 2012, ewes and lambs began foraging at golf courses as well. Ewes and their Iambs now forage at PGA West, .:311verRock or Tradition on a daily basis, Incidents of sheep walking on the streets and throughout residential neighborhoods in La Quinta continue to increase each year: Sheep use of the urban environment changes their natural foraging patterns and behavior and expose them to a variety of risks such as increased spread of diseases, vehicle strikes, entanglement, drowning, predation, increased parasite loads, and exposure to toxins. Since 2012, 3 rams and 1 lamb have drowned in the Coachella Canal, 1 ram was rescued from the canal, 1 ram died from oleander poisoning, and 1 ram was struck and killed on Jefferson Avenue. Disease is rapidly spread among sheep that concentrate within the golf course communities. In 2015, lambs on the golf course were observed with pneumonia and only 11 % of these lambs survived their first year (refer to sections on Respiratory Disease and Lamb Survival and Recruitment for details), (California Department of Fish and Wildlife Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report, Page 18, Exhibit 1, emphasis added)' Y The 2015 Update highlights include the folLowing: Page 8 details a bighorn sheep death on Jefferson Street adjacent to the SilverRock property. Page 9 details how bighorn sheep lambs that feed on gulf courses (urban sheep) have a lower survival rate. Page 9 also has a photo of a sick lamb found on the SilverRock Golf Course, and discusses the observation of sick lambs, yearlings and ewes at SilverRock golf course. Pages 9-10 discuss a moribund lamb from the SilverRock Golf Course that was only 3-months-old but had to be euthanized due to severe iilness. The report concludes that the spread of diseases amongst urban bighorn sheep is facilitated by golf courses such as the 5iJytLR ck Golf Course. Page 12 shows the that one ewe group now spends much of its time foraging within or near the golf courses in La Quinta, and 343 U City Cound l City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Page 4 In 2016, all of the sheep deaths were lambs under six months of age that contracted diseases, while numerous incidences have been documented of sheep entering urban areas, including running through traffic, or falling into the canal. (Bighorn Institutes Monthly Updates, February through October attached as Exhibit 2) 'ji]n May, Five Iambs died on the La Quinta go (courses during a two week period." Exhibit 2, Bighorn Institute June 2016 Monthly Update) While there are numerous urban -related causes for bighorn sheep illness and mortality, there is an undeniable connection between many of these events and the SilverRock Development. One need only review the CDFW Annual Update, Reports from the Bighorn Institute and photos provided in local papers to conclude bighorn sheep are frequenting the SilverRock Development site and suffering as a result. Accordingly, the Planning Commission's approval of the SDP is prohibited, because the site plan allows for the construction of urban facilities in areas now frequented by bighorn sheep, which would inevitably lead to further, unlawful harm to the species. 1. Violation of the Coachella Valley Multi le Species Habitat Conservation Plan for allowing take of Peninsular Bighorn Sheep and for failing to build a sheep harrier Since the project's original approval, the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP) was adopted and the City becarne a permittee subject to certain terms and conditions. Rather than attach the entire MSHCP, we incorporate it by reference as part of the administrative record for this appeal, and provide the following summary. even maps out the "home range" of the urban sleep. "The core use areas are Silverfiock and PGA west golf courses and the desert slopes overlookir?g those courses "(sage 14). WA sheep are Learning the dangerous behavior of foraging on golf courses from the urban sheep, resulting in more sheep being habituated to the urban environment, and therefore more Likely to become sick. (Page 15) "Hopefully, a fence should be in place before this ewe, and others, become habituated to tho urban environment." (Page 15) (California Department of Fish and Wildlife Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annuat Report Exhibit 1, emphasis added) 344 w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 5 With respect to Peninsular bighorn sheep, the MSHCP stated the fallowing: "Although fully protected species are included in the list of Covered Species, Take of these species is not authorized in the NCCP Permit and is prohibited by California Fish and Game Code. The following species in the MSHCP are fully protected under the California Fish and Game Code: 1) Peninsular Bighorn Sheep... "(MSHCP, page 7-1) "The Peninsular bighorn sheep is a California Fully Protected Species and as used with respect to PBS, Take Authorization refers only to disturbance of habitat. The MSHCP does not permit Take of an individual PBS, All Covered Activities of the Plan must avoid actions in violation of Section 47DO of the Fish and Game Code that addresses Fully Protected Species (see IA .section 1.5.5)"(MSHCP, Section 7.3.3.2, Page 7-53, emphasis added) The MSHCP identifies various Conservation Areas and specifies requirements for each. For Unit 6, which is near La Quinta, the measures include provisions to restrict bighorn sheep use of existing urban development near Unit 6. Among the required measures is MSHCP 8.2.4.1 item 14, which states: 14, If the 1JSFW5 or CDFG provides written notice to the CVCC or Local Permittee that Peninsular bighorn sheep are using artificial sources of food or water in unfenced areas of existing urban Development within or near a Conservation Area, the CVCC (unless otherwise agreed to by the applicable Coral Perrnittee) shall cause to be constructed a barrier to sheep access to cure the problem within 2 ears of such notice. The location of this barrier (i.e., an 8-foot fence or functional equivalent) shall be determined by CVCC based on its ability to obtain permissionlaccess to the necessary lands If placement- or a Barrier must occur on other public lands (e.g., BLM,, CDFG), CVCC will coordinate with these ether agencies as appropriate. (emphasis added) In accordance with this measure, a Letter was sent by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife on February 28, 2014 invoking the provision of MSHCP 8,2.4.1, Item 14. This Letter is attached as Exhibit 3. To date, the fence has not been built and the two-year deadline has passed. 345 F� City Counci L City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Page 6 The City, as a member agency to the MSHCP, has a duty to ensure that this measure is implemented. "The Local Permittees must also comply with all other terms and conditions of the AISHCP and IA (See Section 13.0 of the IA)..." (MSHCP, Section 6.6.1) 13.2 County and Cities Obligations The County and the Cities have the following obligations under the MSHCP and this Agreement: G. Take all necessary and appropriate actions, fallowing applicable land use permit enforcementprocedures and practices, to enforce the terms of project approvals for public and private projects, including compliance with the MSHCP, the Permits and this Agreement. (Implementing Agreement for the MSHCP) Sheep continue to die as a direct result of urban development within the City of La Quinta, which is a violation of the MSHCP, since no "take" was permitted by the MSHCP, and immediate action is needed. A fence was to be built within two years if sheep began entering urban areas. The two years have passed without the fence being constructed, which is a direct violation of the MSHCP cited above. Therefore, on September 27, 2016, we sent a Letter to both the US 'FWS and CDFWS seeking for them to revoke the Take Permit under the MSHCP. A copy of that letter is attached as Exhibit 4, 2. Violation of previousLy issued City approvals for the project for faiLing to cam ty with the conditions requiring a sheep barrier The City of La Quinta Redevelopment Agency acquired the SilverRock Specific Plan Area in 2002. 525 acres of vacant property were purchased by the former La Quinta Redevelopment Agency for an area the Agency called "The Ranch". The Redevelopment Agency used property tax revenue and tax exempt and taxable bonds to fund this purchase and begin construction of the SilverRock Resort Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course in 2004. The 18-hole Arnold Palmer Classic Golf Course opened in march 2005. This 18-hoLe public golf course occupies approximately 200 acres of the Specific Plan Area. In 2006, the City approved a Specific Plan to guide development for the remainder of the site. The Specific Ulan Area is slightly smalLer in size than the originaL "Ranch", but the uses allowed within the Specific Plan were similar to the original ruses contemplated by the Redevelopment Agency at the time of purchase. The SilverRock Resort Specific Plan was approved by Resolution 2006-083. The City selected a developer to implement the 346 FW City Council City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Page 7 Specific Plan, but in 2008, the economic downturn precluded development and, shortly thereafter, the relationship with the developer came to an end. The City now intends to have the new developer move forward with implementation of the Specific Plan. The SilverRock Resort Specific Plan requires compliance with all mitigation measures identified in the MND and Addendum, which are discussed in more detail below. 3.2 Development Review Permits and Process The permits, appruvai process and required findings for development of .SilverRock are set forth in the City of La Quinta Zoning Code. In addition, the following shall apply' 32.16 SP 2006-0.90 shall comply with all applicable conditions and/ or mitigation measures for Environmental Assessment 200.E-453, Addendum 1. In the event of any conflict(5) between approval conditions and/ or provisions of these approvals, the Community Development Director s17ail determine precedence. (Page 48; Page 50)- In addition, the SilverRock Resort Specific Plan specifically found that compliance with the General Plan Natural Resources ELernent is predicated on the impLemaentation of the mitigation measures outlined in the environmental documents. The summary of key goals and aims identified in the General Plan are used in this Specific Plan Amendment for SilverRock as the basis for evaluating the Specific Plans consistency with the Citys General Plan, Applicable General Plan goals are stated below followed by a statement of how the SilverRock Specific Plan implements each. • The protection and preservation of unique andf or valuable biological resources, including sensitive, rare, threatened or endangered species and their habitat " • CEDA documentation in the form of an Addendum to the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the Specific Plan identifies potential impacts to Biological resources and recommends necessary mitigation measures to 347 w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 8 maintain potential impacts by the Specific Plan to less than significant levels. Preservation of the portion of the Santa Rosa Mountains within the Specific Plan Area and buffer measures to mitigate potential impacts to sensitive species in the mountainous terrain has been identified. (SilverRock Resort 5perifir Plan, Pages 51 and 59, General Plan Consistency with Natural Resources Element) In 2011, the State elected to abolish redevelopment agencies and liquidate their assets. The City became the owner of the golf course, rather than the Redevelopment Agency. In order to implement the Specific Plan, in November 2014 the City adopted a Development Agreement (DA) to provide SilverRock Development Company, LLC with a vested right to the current General Plan, SilverRock Specific Plan, and other specified land use entitlements. Annual review of the progress of the project was to be conducted pursuant to Section 4.3 of the DA. The DA was approved by an Ordinance, which references the mitigation requirements, and the document itself included the requitement to build the fence: NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California does ordain as follows: SECTION Z. ENVIRONMENTAL. An Addendum to a previously adapted Mitigated Negative Declaration (EA 2002-453) and subsequent Addendum (EA 2006-568) was prepared pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, was confirmed and adapted by the City Council, on November 4, 2014. Said determination, extends to include this Development Agreement, based on its incorporation as part of the overall project, as defined under CEL9A. (Ordinance 520, Page 4 of 64, Recorded Document DOC #2014- 0484106; Development Agreement 2014-1001) 1.7 City CEQA Findings City finds that review of the environmental impacts of this Agreement and the Project has been conducted in accordance with the provisions of CEQA and the State and local guidelines adopted thereunder, and City has given consideration to such environmental review prior to its approval of this 348 LW; City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 9 Agreement and the Project and has undertakers all actions necessary to comply with CEQA. (DA, page 9) 3.3 Mitigation Monitoring Program The Developer shall also comply with the mitjgation monitoring program set forth in Exhibit "C" attached hereto (the Mitigation Monitoring Program). (DA, page 13) Exhibit C contains the ongoing requirement to build the fence. If Bighorn Sheep enter into the SRR SP Area, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less If determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed: The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. if the Department transfer or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the Department shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. (CIA, Exhibit C, page 7) In addition, in 2014 the City approved a Purchase, Sale, and Development Agreement (PSDA) - This is the main operative agreement for the sale and development of the property and includes the requirement for banding and construction of the fence prior to any grading on the site, as detaited in the fallowing provisions: 100 DEFINITIONS °`Luxury Hotel Fence" means a fence (or the functionalequivalent, as determined by City) that meets the applicable specifications and .standards of the Coachella Valley Conservation Commission acting as authorized agent for the requirements and obligations of the Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. (PSDA, Page 6) 205. Conditions of Closing. Each of the Phase 1 Closing and Phase 2 Closing is conditioned upon the satisfaction of the following terms and conditions within the times designated below., 349 w City Council City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Page 10 205.1 City's Conditions of Closing. City's obligation to proceed with the Phase 1 Closing or Phase 2 Closing (as applicable) is su6ject to the fulfillment, or waiver by City, of each and all of the canditicns precedent (a) through (w), inclusive, described below ("City's Conditions Precedent to the Closing'), which are solely for the Benefit of CityY, and which shall he fulfilled or waived by the time periods provided for herein: (q) Security for Luxury Hotel Fence. Developer shall have delivered to City evidence, in a form satisfactory to City, in Citys reasonable discretion, that Developer has obtained Contractor Bonds_ or other security acceptable to City, for the completion of the Luxury Hotel Fence. Said Contractor Bonds shall be Issued to, and shall be enforceable by City. (PSDA, pages 1.6-19, emphasis added) 208. installation of Luxury Hotel Fence; Implementation of bust Control Program. (a) Within the time set forth in the Schedule of Performance, and prior to the time Developer commences anE grading activities on the Phase T Property Developer shall install the Luxury Hotel Fence. Developer shall defend, with counsel approved by City in City: sole and absolute discretion, indemnify, assume all responsibility for, and hold the Indemnitees harmless from all claims, demands, damages, defense costs or liability of any kind arising from Developer's failure to strictly comply with the Mitigation Measures related to the protection of Bighorn Sheep set forth in that certain Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact for Environmental Assessment 2802-435 (State Clearinghouse No. 1999081020). (PSDA, page 29-29 emphasis added) Notwithstanding the fact that all City Approvals to date have included the requirement to build the fence, Site Development Permit 2016-0005 does not include plans for construction of the fence, Accordingly, the Planning Commission's finding that the SDP is consistent with past approvals is erroneous and not supported by substantial evidence. 350 0 City Council City of La Ouinta November 8, 2016 Page 11 3. 'Violation of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for failing to supplement the environmental review due to changed circumstances and evidence of new siignificant impacts to Peninsular Bighorn Sheep To date, environmental review for the project has been limited to a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") and addendums to the MND. The City has never completed an EIR for this project. Approval of the initial project was supported by the MND (EA 2002-453). An addendum to the MND was prepared in 2006 to support approval of the Specific Plana (EA 2006-568) A second addendum to the MND was prepared in 2014 to support approval of the Development Agreement and the Purchase, Sale and Development Agreement (2014- 1.03). None of the environmental review documents contemplated significant impacts to Bighorn Sheep, and none of them assessed the potential for death of bighorn sheep. All impacts were to be mitigated to below significance. As there was no EIR, no Overriding Consideratiuns were adopted. Any potential impacts to the sheep were mitigated by the provision of a buffer, and the requirement to build a fence. At the time of the original project approval, the mitigation measures gained the support of the Resource Agencies: Agency Counsel Jenson noted the essential habitat lure for the gig Horn Sheep is at the toe of the dope and includes everything above that area. As for the Mitigated Negative Declaration, she stated oral comments were received from the Department of Fish & Game and L1.5 Fish and Wildlife and both were very satisfied with the mitigation measures (Redevelopment Agency Minutes for hearing on 5-15-2002, Page 5) The key language for each of the environmental review documents is provided below: 2002 MND (EA 2002-453) The requirement for a fence was one of the original mitigation measures of the project when it was approved in 2002. The Mitigated Negative Declaration included the following: The Santa Rosa Mountains have historically provided habitat for peninsular bighorn sheep, a state and federally listed endangered species. Additional 351 W' City Council City of La auinta November 8, 2016 Page 12 focused surveys performed in 1999 found no evidence of bighorn sheep in the vicinity of the Proposed Protect. The USPWS has defined the "essential habitat" of the peninsular bighorn sheep. Essential habitat covers the entire portion of the Cora1 Reef Mountains within the Project boundaries down to the too -of -slope. As no development would infringe above the toe -of -slope, no portion of the project would be developed in the essential peninsular bighorn sheep habitat Nonetheless, standard measures are included for the project should peninsular bighorn sheep came on site. Through the implementation of the recommended mitigation measures, no significant imgacts would occur. (2002 MND page 15, emphasis added) Mitigation Measures 1. A mountain toe -of slope buffer /mitigation concept plan has been prepared to protect peninsular big horn sheep, and other wildlife, from entering the non -mountainous portion of the site proposed for development. This concept plan illustrates a continuous buffer to the toe -of -slope in areas where development could occur adjacent to the mountain edge. The concept plan delineates the location, acreage and native plant species envisioned for the mitigation area. This plan shall be incorporated into the project design and shall be subject to review by the City prier to the issuance of grading permits. A copy of this mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan Is available for review at the City of La Quinta Community Development Department. 2. if Bighorn .Sheep enter onto the Project Site, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be 11 centimeters ('4.5 inches) or less. if determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. if the Agency transfer or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the Agency shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. (2002 M N C, pages 16- 17) 352 rW CityCouncil City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 1,3 Note that the mitigation measure requires the City to build a temporary fence, if deemed necessary. The Resolution certifying the MND confirmed that the mitigation measures were adopted as part of the project. The mitigation measures identified In the Mitigated Negative Declaration have been incorporated into the Project and these measures mitigate any potential significant effect to a point where clParlV no significant environmental effects wilt occur as a result of this Project. (Redevelopment Agency Resolution 2002-009, emphasis added) The MMP lists the City of La Quinta as the responsibLe agency to ensure that the mitigation measure i5 enforced (Exhibit A to 2002 MND MMP, page 7) 2006 ADDENDUM (EA 2006-568) The 2006 Addendum to the 2002 MND continued the requirement for the fence. The Addendum included updated information to reflect changes in the Specific Plan Area, including but not limited to the development of one of the two allowed golf courses since the certification of the MND. The Addendum identified that City staff was working with the USFWS and CDFW regarding Peninsular bighorn sheep sightings on and adjacent to the Specific Plan Area and that, if needed, a Peninsular bighorn sheep perimeter fence would be installed Again, impacts to sheep were deemed less than significant with incorporation of the mitigation measures. Standard measures were included in the Ranch MNO should peninsular bighorn sheep come on to the Ranch Project site. Implementation of these mitigation measures would mitigate any potential impacts to bighorn sheep to a less than significant level. City staff is currently working with the USFWS and CDFG regarding recent peninsular bighorn sheep sightings on and adjacent to the SRR SP Area. If needed, a peninsular bighorn sheep perimeter fence maybe installed Impacts to biological resources associated with the SRR SP would be the same as these identified for the Ranch Project because the type of development and permitted uses would be substantially the same as previously analyzed in the MIVO. There is, therefore, no substantial change 353 LW City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 14 from the project that was subject to the I+MND and the SRR SP is consistent with the determinations, findings, and conclusions contained in the General Plan EIR. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts would occur with the implementation of the SRR SP Mitigation Measures The following mitigation measures, identified in the adapted Final MND for the Ranch Project, are applicable to the proposed SilverRock Resort Specific Plan. 1. A mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan has been prepared to protect peninsular Bighorn Sheep, and other wildlife, from entering the non -mountainous portion of the SRR SP Area proposed for development. This conceptplan illustrates o continuous buffer to the toe -of - slope in areas where development could occur adjacent to the mountain edge. The concept plan delineates the location, acreage and native plant species envisioned for the mitigation area. This plan shall be incorporated into the ,project design and shall be subject to review by the City prier to the issuance cf grading permits A copy of this mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan is available for review at the City of La ►Quinta Community Development Department. 2, If Bighorn Sheep enter into the SRR SP Area, an 8-foot fence (or the functional equivalent) between the development and the hillside shall be constructed. The gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches,) or less. If determined necessary, the City shall construct temporary fencing while permanent fencing is constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If the Department transfer or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the hillside, the Department shall reserve an easement sufficient for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. (2046 Addendum, pages 28-29) The Resolution certifying the Addendum fount that no significant impacts would occur, based on incorporation of the mitigation measures: WHEREAS, card Specific Plant application has complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 354 w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 15 1970' as amended (Resolution 83-68), in that the to Quinta Community Development Department has completed and addendum toEnvironmental Assessment (EA) 2002-453. The City has determined that the project with required Mitigation Measures will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and therefore, recommends an Addendum to the previously certified Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact be certified; (City Council Resolution 2006-083) The MMP for the 2006 Addendum listed the same mitigation measures, with the City as the responsible agency to ensure compliance. (Addendum, MMP, page 7) 2014 ADDENDUM EA 2014-103 The 2014 Addendum recognized that sheep had begun entering the project site, but did not discuss any harm or significant impacts to sheep because the construction of the fence was going to mitigate the impacts to below significance. The Santa Rosa Mountains historically provided habitat for peninsular bighorn sheep a state- and federally -listed endangered specie.. Focused surveys performed in 1999 found no evidence of bighorn sheep in the vicinity of the 2002 MND Project Site, Essential habitat of the peninsular bighorn sheep in this area was defined by the IJSFWS to include the Santa Rosa Mountains down to the toe -of -slope. As no development was proposed to infringe above the toe -of -slope, no portion of the 2002 MND Project Site would have been developed in the essential peninsular bighorn sheep habitat. Nonetheless, mitigation measures were identified for the 2002 MND Project .should peninsular bighorn sheep encroach on to the 2002 MND Project Site. Mitigation measures 1 through 10 were found to mitigate any potential significant impacts to bighorn sheep. The 2014 Addendum (PA 2014-1003) also specifically found that the fence was required as mitigation for project impacts: Mitigation measures 1 through 10 were included in the 2002 MND to prevent peninsular bighorn sheep from corning onto the 2006 Addendum Project Site. The 2006 Addendum identified that City staff was working with 355 w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 16 the USFWS and CDFC regarding peninsular bighorn sheep sightings on and adjacent to the Specific Plan Area and that, if needed, a peninsular bighorn sheep perimeter fence would be installed Implementation of these mitigation measures would mitigate any potential impacts to bighorn sheep to a less than significant level. Subsequent to adoption of the 2002 MND, construction of the Arnold Palmer Golf Course commenced. As identified above, mitigation measures 11 and 12 were implemented to minimize biological impacts identified in the 2002 MND. The 2006 Addendum identified that mitigation measures 1 through 10 were still applicable to the Specific Plan. Impacts to biological resources associated with the Specific Plan were identified as being the same as those identified in the 2002 M1VD because potential impacts to biological resources would be mitigated with implementation of the mitigation measures 1 through 10 identified in the 2002 MND. No substantial changes from the 2002 MND were identified and no new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts were identified for the Specific Plan. Bighorn sheep are a covered species within the CVMSCHP and development within or adjacent to bighorn sheep habitat is subject to a variety of requirements set forth in the CVMSCHP. The Modified Project Site is immediately adjacent to the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains, The 2002 MND identified mitigation measures to protect the bighorn sheep. Mitigation measure 1 and 2 require a mountain toe -of --slope buffer/mitigation concept plan that would include the development of a fence to prevent bighorn sheep access to the Modified Project Site. The plan would protect bighorn sheep and other wildlife from entering the golf course and development areas. The IJSFWS and the CDFW provided a notice to the City to express concerns regarding urban -related impacts to the peninsular bighorn sheep in February 28, 2014.21 .Specifically, the letter raised concerns regarding observations of bighorn sheep regularly grazing within several golf resorts including the golf course located within the .Specific Plan Area, The bighorn sheep are using these areas to forage and to possibly locate water. Pursuant to the 356 U City Cound I City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Paige 17 CVMSHCP, when a written notice that bighorn sheep are using artificial sources of water or food in unfenced areas of existing urban development within or near a conservation area, a barrier (i.e. an 8-foot fence or functional equivalen) to sheep access is required to be constructed within two years of the notice. The notice also requires that the City provide the Wildlife Agencies (USFWS and CDFW) with a letter -report of actions taken to notify and work with golf resort owners1managers to plan fence construction. This report is required to include a preliminary map of fence locations, provisions for development, any CEQA analysis that may be required, and a timeline for construction. At a minimum, the City will provide an appra�r ate barrier as deemed necessary and accepted bE the Wildlife Agencies The City, in conjunction with the USFW , CDFW, and CVAG, is currently in discussions to prepare this plan, The Modified Project Site has been graded and partially developed with the Arnold Palmer Golf Course. The development of resort uses on previously graded areas would not have an adverse effect on any sensitive natural community identified in the General Plan, the CVM5HCP, policies, and regulations or by the CDFW or USFWS, The Modified Project will also include design features 6 and g identified in the 2035 General Plan to reduce potential impacts to sensitive biological species Any future development would be _subject to compliance with specific goals and measures set forth in the CVMSHCP. The Modified Project Site is not located directly within the CVMSHCP Conservation areas, but the Modified Project Site is located adjacent to the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area. The Modified Project would be required to pay the CVMSHCP1Natural Community Conservation Plan Mitigation Fee as required by design feature 1 identified in the 2035 General Plan. Consequently, impacts associated with the Modified Project would be similar to those identified in the 2002 MNO and 2006 Addendum and would be less than si nificant with the incur oration of mitt ation measures 1 through 10 identified in the 2002 MAD and 2006 Addendum, as well as the incorporation of design features 1, 6, and g identified in the 2035 General Plan. No new information, changed circumstances, or more severe impacts 357 Lw� City Council City of La auinta November 8, 2016 Page 18 would occur with the implementation of the Modified Project. (2014 Addendum, Section J.7, emphasis added) The MMP for the 2014 Addendum listed the same mitigation measures, with the City as the responsible agency to ensure compliance. (2014 MND, MMP, page 7) None of the CEQA documents have ever assessed the potential for significant impacts to Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. The early environmental documents stated that sheep never entered the project site. There is now undeniable evidence that sheep are entering the project site and that without implementation of the fence mitigation, impacts to bighorn sheep will be substantially more severe than contemplated in any of the existing environm+entat documents. Bighorn Sheep are becoming sick and are dying as a result of entering the project site. The new information provided by the CDFW 2015 Annual Report constitutes new information of substantial importance. It also means that there is a change in circumstances since the environmental review was completed. As indicated below, Bighorn Sheep are fully protected mammals and the City is obligated to consider this evidence prior to taking any further action that could harm the bighorn sheep. Pursuant to CEQA Guideline 15162, the City must require additional environmental review, which in this case means preparation of an EIR because of the significant impacts to bighorn sheep. Although there is a statutory presumption against additional environmental review, the substantial evidence in this case is overwhelming and clearly rebuts any presumption in favor of the developer. (Moss v County of Humboldt (2008) 162 Cal.App.4th 1041, 76 Cat.Rptr.3d 428, Melom v City of Madera (2010) 183 CaL.App.4th 41; 106 CaL.Rptr.3d 755) Agencies must still require further environmental review when the following conditions are met.] § 21166. SURSEQUENTOR SUPPLEMENTAL 1MP4CT I? EPOP ; CONDITIONS When an environmental impact report has been prepared for a prolect pursuant to this division, no subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report shall be required by the lead agency or by any responsible agency, unless one or more of the following events occurs., (a) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the environmental impact report 358 LW City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 19 (b) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is being undertaken which will require major revisions in the environmental impact report (c) Npw information, which was not known and could not have been known at the time the environmental impact report was certified as complete, becomes available. In this case, issuance of the SDP is considered a discretionary action which triggers the need to comply with CEQAI. The new information provided by the Fish and WILdLife Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report, and the Bighorn Institutes monthly updates satisfy the conditions of Section 21166 regarding new information, because it was not known when the WIND was certified, is "of substantial importance" and demonstrates that the project will have significant effects not discussed in the previous negative declaration, and that effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than stated in the prior review. (GuideLines, § 15162, subd. (a)(3); cf. Laurel Heights improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1993) 6 C,ai.4th 1112, 1126-1129, 26 Cal.Rptr.2d 231, 864 P.2d 502.. 4. Violation of CEOA for falling to enforce miti ation measures that require a sheep -harrier CEQA Section 21081.6 requires the City to have fuLLy enforceable mitigation measures, and to ensure compliance through its Mornitoring Program, The City is the agency responsible to ensure compliance of the mitigation measure of constructing the fence during project implementation, but the City has failed to ensure compliance. 2 L1.14 "Discretionary Permits" means any permits, Approvals, plans, Project tract Maps, inspections, certificates, documents, and licenses that require o DiscretOnary Action, ir;cluding, without limitation, Project Site Development Permits, grading permits, stockpile permits, and encroachment permits. (DA, recorded as document 2014- 0484106) 359 U City Council City of La Ouinta November 8, 2016 Page 20 § 21081.6. FINQIN6S OR NEGATIVE DECLARATI0NS•_ REPORTING OR MpNI TORIIVG PROJECT CHANGES; EFFECT ON ENV ZRONAIENT C-ONDI TIONS (a) When making the findings required by paragraph (1) of subdivision (a) of Section 21081 or when adopting a mitigated negative declaration pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 21080, the following requirements shall apply:- (1) The public agency shall adopt a reporting or monitoring program for the changes made to the project or conditions of project approval, adapted in order to mitigate or avoid significant effects on the environment The reporting or monitoring program shall be designed to ensure compliance during project implementation. For those changes which have been required or incorporated into the project at the request of a responsible agency or a public agency having jurisdiction by law over natural resources affected by the project, that agency shall, if so requested by the lead agency or a responsible agency, prepare and submit a proposed reporting or monitoring program. The lead agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other material which constitute the record of proceedings upon which its decision is based. (b) A public agency shall provide that measures to mitigate or award significant effects on the environment are fully enforceable through permit conditions, agreements, or other measures. Conditions of project approval may be set forth in referenced documents which address required mitigation measures or, in the case of the adoption of a plan, policy, regulation, or other public project, by incorporating the mitigation measures into the plan, policy, regulation, or project design. Once incorporated in an environmental document, mitigation measures cannot be defeated by ignoring them or by attempting to render them meaningless by moving ahead with the project in spite of them, even where subsequent approvals are ministerial. If a mitigation measure in an environmental document later becomes impractical or unworkable, a supplemental EIR must be prepared, the governing body must state a Legitimate reason for deleting the earlier adapted mitigation measure, and the governing 360 U City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 21 body must support that statement of reason with substantial evidence. (sierra Club v. County of San Diego, 231 Cal.App.4th 1152 (2014) 180 Cal.Rptr.3d 154) The purpose of these requirements is to ensure that feasible mitigation measures will actually be implemented as a condition of development, and not merely adopted and then neglected or disregarded. Lincoln Place Tenants Assn v. City of Los Angeles (2005) 130 CaLApp.4th 1491, 1508 (31 CaLRptr.3d 353, 366], as modified an denial of reh'g (Aug. 11, 2005) citing Federation of Hillside & Canyon Associations v City of Los Angeles (2000) 83 Cal.App.4th 1252, 1261, 100 Cal.Rptr.2d 301. (Italics deleted). S Violation of the FulLy Protected Mammal Act for allowing take of Pertii!jj Lar Bighorn Sheep Pursuant to the Fish and Game Cade Section 711.7, the fish and wildlife resources are held in trust for the people of the state by and through the Department of Fish and Wildlife. Certain species within the state are afforded special protection. One such species is the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep, in accordance with Fish and Game Code 4700 which states: (a) (1) Except as pro vide in this section, Section 2 08 1. 7, or Section 2835, a fully protected mammal may not be taken or possessed at any time. No provision of this code or any other law shall be construed to authorize the issuance of a permit or license to take a fully protected mammal, and no permit or license previously issued shall have any farce or effect for that purpose. However, the department may authorize the taping of a fully protected mammal for necessary scientific research, including efforts to recover fully protected, threatened, or endangered species (2) As used in this subdivision, ':scientific research " does not include an action taken as part of specified mitigation for a project, as defined in Section 21065 of the Public Resources Code. (3) A legally imported fully protected mammal may be possessed under a permit issued by the department. (b) The following are fully protected mammals.• (2) Bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis), except Nelson bighorn sheep (subspecies +Ovis canadensis nelson) as ,provided by subdivision (b) of Section 490E. 361 City Council City of La Qu i nta November 8, 2016 Page 22 With limited exceptions, no take of Peninsular bighorn sheep can be authorized. Although the Department i5 now authorized under Fish and Game Code Section 28351 to allow the take of fully protected species whose conservation and management is provided for in a natural community conservation plan approved by the Department, the Department is only permitted to authorize take as part of a conservation measure, and is not authorized to permit any take as part of any urban development. (See Center for Riologic-al Diversity v. California department of Fish and Wildlife (2015) 62 Cal.41" 204; 195 Gal. Rptr.3d 247). If the Trustee Agency is prohibited from issuing a take permit, it follows that the City of La Quinta has no authority to issue an approval that has the effect of authorizing the continued "take" of Peninsular bighorn sheep. 6. VioLation of Loth the State and FederaL Endangered Species Acts for allowing take of sheep Peninsular Bighorn Sheep are listed under both the Federal and State Endangered Species Acts, which prohibit take of the species. Section 9 of the Federal ESA and its implementing regulations prohibit the unauthorized "take" of listed species. 16 U.S.C. § 1538(a)(1); 16 U.S.C. § 1533(d); SD C.F.R. § 17.31. "Take„ is defined broadly to include harming, harassing, trapping, capturing, wounding or killing a protected species either directly or by degrading its habitat, See 16 U.S.C. § 1532(19). Taking that is in compliance with the terms and conditions specified in a biological opinion is not considered a prohibited taking under Section 9 of the ESA. 16 U.S.C. § 1536(o)(2). Fish and Game Code Section 2080 prohibits take of endangered or threatened species. "Take" means hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill, or attempt to hunt, pursue, catch, capture, or kill. (Fish and Game Code Section 86) 3 2835. At the time of plan approval, the department may authorize by permit the taking of any covered species, including species designated a5 fully protected species pursuant to Sections 3511, 4700, 5050, or 5515, whose conservation and management is provided for in a natural community conservation plan approved by the department. 362 FW City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 23 The City's failure to construct the required fence to protect Peninsular bighorn sheep and the planning Commission's approval of the SDP, which allows further harm to the species, violates the state and federal Endangered Species Acts. 7. Violation of the Public Trust Resources As indicated above, the fish and wildlife resources are held in trust for the people of the state by and through the Department of Fish and Wildlife. The City has no authority to authorize the take of these public resources and is violating its public trust duties by failing to protect an endangered wildlife species and fully protected mammal within its borders. Conclusion The time has come for the City of La Quinta to step up to the plate and fulfil its promises of protecting the Bighorn Sheep by constructing a fence, either temporary or permanent, prior to more sheep deaths occurring. Given the 'history of harm to bighorn sheep, the fact that it is a fully protected mammal and no take is allowed under state law, or under the requirements of the MSHCP and past City Approvals, this project cannot be advanced by any new approval until the fence has been constructed. The City is currently in violation of its obligations under the MSHCP, past approvals and CiQA, The recently approved Site development Permit fails to include provisions to construct the fence. There is no substantial evidence to support any city findings with regard to consistency with the MSHCP, Past City Approvals, Prior Environmental Documents, or federal and state law. The Sierra Club and Center urge you to uphold this appeal and deny the request for approval of a site plan, architecture and Landscaping for a 140 room luxury hotel, 29 hotel -branded residences, a spa, a meeting and conference center, and a shared service facility, and to not make a finding of consistency with Environmental Assessment 2014-1003. 363 Fw� City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 24 Please place this office on the mailing list to receive all future notices about this project. Very truly yours, WORDEN WILLIAMS LLP D. Wayne Brechtel, Esq. dwb a@wordenw LLiams.com DWB:Ig cc: Clients Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (E-mail: tkirk cva .or ) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (E-Mail: paul souzaRfws.g_ov) California Department of Fish and Wildlife (E-Mail: director cz wildlife.ca,go_v) 364 ❑w City Council City of La Quinta November 8, 2016 Page 25 List of Exhibits Documents that are attached to this Letter: Exhibit 1. California Department of Fish and Wildlife Peninsular Bighorn Sheep 2015 Annual Report, Exhibit 2. Bighorn Institute Monthly Updates February to October 2016 Exhibit 3 Letter from U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife on February 28, 2014 Exhibit 4 60 Day Notice of Intent to Sue dated September 27, 2016 Project Documents within City Files are incorporated by Reference for the Administrative Record, including, at a minimum, the following: 1. Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan 2. 5ilverRock Resort Specific Plan 3. Development Agreement 2014-1001, Recorded Document DOC #2014-0484106; 4. Purchase, Sale and Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014 5. City of La Quinta Environmental Assessment 2002-453 6. City of La Quinta Environmental Assessment EA 2006-568 7. City of La Quinta Environmental Assessment EA 2014-103 8. Redevelopment Resolution 2002-009 9. City Counci I. Resolution 2006-082 10, City Council Resolution 2006-083 11. City Council Resolution 2014-059 12. Redevelopment Agency Minutes 5-15-2002 365 366 ATTACHMENT 5 CITY OF LA QUINTA MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PROJECT NAME: The Ranch/SilverRock Resort SCH No.: 1999081020 APPROVAL DATE: May 15th, 2002/July 18th, 2006 The Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) has been prepared in conformance with Section 21081.6 of the California Environmental Quality Act. It is the intent of this program to (1) verify satisfaction of the required mitigation measures; (2) provide a methodology to document implementation of the required mitigation; (3) provide a record of the Monitoring Program; (4) identify monitoring responsibility; (5) establish administrative procedures for the clearance of mitigation measures; (6) establish the frequency and duration of monitoring; and (7) utilize existing review processes wherever feasible. The following environmental mitigation measures were incorporated in to the approval for this project in order to mitigate potentially significant environmental impacts to a level of insignificance. A completed and signed checklist for each mitigation measure indicates that this mitigation measure has been complied with and implemented, and fulfills the City of La Quinta's monitoring requirements with respect to Assembly Bill3180 (Public Resources Code Section 21081.6). Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Geology The soils at the site Prior to the design and construction of any structural Receipt of site City of La Quinta Prior to the have the potential improvements, a comprehensive design level specific issuance of any for geotechnical evaluations shall be prepared that geotechnical/ grading permits hydroconsolidation includes subsurface exploration and laboratory testing. engineering with the addition of Recommendations for grading/earthwork, surface and plans for the water subsurface drainage, foundations, pavement structural Project sections, and other pertinent geotechnical design considerations shall be formulated and implemented based on the findings of this evaluation. The Project Site All buildings planned as a result of the Proposed Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the would be subject to Project shall be constructed in conformance with the construction issuance of any ground shaking Uniform Building Code, as adopted by the City of La plans building permits during a seismic Quinta. event. Water The project would During construction activities, water trucks are to Field City of La Quinta Ongoing during use potable water acquire water from non -potable water sources, such as inspection construction for dust reclaimed water and/or canal water. suppression instead of reclaimed water 367 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Cumulative use of At such time that non -potable water sources become Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the potable water for available to the project site, the project shall connect landscape and and Coachella issuance of irrigation would to this resource and utilize the non -potable water for project plans Valley Water building permits. incrementally irrigation purposes. to identify the District contribute to the ability to demand on water connect to supplies non -potable water sources in the future Drought tolerant landscaping shall be utilized as a Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the means of reducing water consumption. landscape and issuance of project plans building permits The project will A hydrology master plan shall be prepared for the Receipt of site City of La Quinta Prior to the result in changes to Project Specific Plan. Further, a hydrology study shall hydrology issuance of grading absorption rates, be prepared to support the hydrology master plan. master plan permits drainage patterns, This study shall demonstrate that the project would and study for or the rate and construct storm drainage and hydrologic the Project amount of surface improvements, such as on -site stormwater retention runoff basins, that conform to the City`s master hydrology and storm drain improvement program as well as implement regional and local requirements, policies and programs. Prior to the initiation of any construction activity on the Provide NOI Regional Water Prior to the project site, a Notice of Intent (NOI), Storm Water and Quality Control issuance of any Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and Monitoring verification Board grading permits Plan will be filed with the RWQCB under the general that it was NPDES construction permit. The SWPPP shall include sent to Best Management Practices (BMPs) in compliance with RWQCB the NPDES program requirements. Any existing groundwater wells located on the site that Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the are no longer in use shall be abandoned in accordance construction issuance of any with Federal, State, and local laws and regulations prior plans grading permits to the issuance of building permits. -2- 368 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Design of new roads, golf courses, man-made ponds, Review of site, City of La Quinta Prior to the common landscape areas, storm water basins, and storm issuance of grading other facilities shall incorporate proper engineering drainage and permits controls to channel storm and irrigation runoff into landscape detention/retention facilities that are sized to plans accommodate design year storms and that incorporate filtration systems or other devices to reduce the potential for herbicides, pesticides, fertilizers, and other contaminants to percolate to groundwater or surface water runoff. Water from golf Prior to operation of the golf course, the golf course Receipt of City of La Quinta Prior to the course operation operator shall prepare a Golf Course Management Plan Golf Course issuance of would contain that includes an irrigation plan, water usage plan, and Management operation permit pollutants that chemical management plan in order to reduce, to the Plan impact extent feasible, golf course irrigation runoff and groundwater percolation into the groundwater basin. quality Air Quality Construction Construction equipment shall be phased and operated Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of activity generates in a manner to ensure the lowest construction -related construction grading permit vehicular air quality pollutant emission levels practical, and shall require the management pollutants use of water trucks, temporary irrigation systems and plan other measures which will limit fugitive dust emissions during site disturbance and construction. The following measures shall be implemented to Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the reduce construction related traffic congestion: construction issuance of grading • Configure construction parking to minimize traffic management permit disturbance plan • Minimize obstruction of through -traffic lanes • Provide flag person to ensure safety at construction sites, as necessary • Schedule operations affecting roadways for off- peak traffic hours • Provide rideshare incentives to construction personnel -3- 369 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Emissions of PM10 A PM10 Management Plan for construction operations Review of dust City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of would exceed the shall be submitted prior to the issuance of grading control plan grading permit thresholds of permits. The plan shall include dust management significance during controls such as: construction • Water site and equipment morning and evening • Spread soil binders on site, unpaved roads, and parking areas • Re-establish ground cover on construction site through seeding and watering • Pave construction roads, where appropriate • Operate street -sweepers on paved roads adjacent to site Air quality control measures identified in the Coachella Review of dust City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of Valley PM10 State Implementation Plan shall be control plan grading permit implemented. To reduce VOC emissions associated with architectural Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of coatings, water -based or low-VOC coatings shall be construction building permit used and applied with spray equipment with high management transfer efficiency and/or the need for paints and plan solvents should be reduced by using pre -coated building materials or naturally colored building materials. -4- 370 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Operation of the Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of proposed project solar or low emission water heaters to reduce natural construction occupancy permit would result in gas consumption and emissions. and site plans increased air pollutant Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize emissions. built-in energy -efficient appliances to reduce energy consumption and emissions. Shade trees shall be provided in close proximity to Timeshare, hotel and golf facility structures to reduce building heating/cooling needs. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize energy -efficient and automated controls for air conditioners to reduce energy consumption and emissions. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall be constructed using special sunlight -filtering window coatings or double -paned windows to reduce thermal gain or loss. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall utilize automatic lighting on/off controls and energy -efficient lighting (including parking areas) to reduce electricity consumption and associated emissions. Timeshare and golf facility construction shall use light- colored roofing materials in residential construction as opposed to dark roofing materials. Bus stops shall be positioned at locations on and Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of adjacent to the site to be determined in coordination construction grading permit with the bus transit service provider that will serve the and site plans project area. Bus stops should be generally located 1/4 mile walking distance from Timeshare units. The golf course shall design on -site circulation plans for Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of clubhouse parking to reduce vehicle queuing. construction grading permit and site plans -5- 371 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Transporta Increases in local A traffic signal shall be installed at the Project entrance Warrant study City of La Quinta Ongoing tion and roadway volumes and Avenue 52, the Project entrance and Jefferson Circulation would Street and at the intersection of Avenue 54 and incrementally Jefferson Street when and if they are warranted. The decrease developer of the site shall be responsible for payment intersection LOS of a fair share of the cost of installing these signals. Biological During construction Efforts shall be made to ensure that all pesticides, Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the Resources and landscaping fungicides, herbicides and fertilizers used during the Construction issuance of grading activities, impacts construction and operation of the Project Site will not and permits to common wildlife be harmful to wildlife. Landscaping would occur plan During construction A construction plan shall be prepared and Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the and operation, demonstrate, to the extent practicable, construction Construction issuance of grading there is a potential activities that emit excessive noise will be avoided plan permits impact to adjacent to the hillside. In addition, during grading and Peninsular bighorn construction activities any blasting or pile -driving near sheep and other the hillside will not occur during the period from Jan. 1 wildlife through June 30th. Potential impact to The landscape plan shall include only plants that are Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of Peninsular bighorn non -toxic to wildlife. All exotic plans such as tamarisk project building permit sheep from and fountain grass are prohibited. Existing trees may landscape increased human remain. plan presence on Project Site -6- 372 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks A mountain toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan Review of City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of has been prepared to protect peninsular big horn construction, grading permit sheep, and other wildlife, from entering the non- landscape and mountainous portion of the site proposed for site plan development. This concept plan illustrates a continuos (Agency shall, buffer to the toe -of -slope in areas where development to the extent could occur adjacent to the mountain edge. The practical, concept plan delineates the location, acreage and widen the native plant species envisioned for the mitigation area. narrowest This plan shall be incorporated into the project design points of the and shall be subject to review by the City prior to the buffer areas issuance of grading permits. A copy of this mountain to minimize toe -of -slope buffer/mitigation concept plan is available the impacts for review at the City of La Quinta Community on the hillside) Development Department. If Bighorn Sheep enter onto the Project Site, an 8-foot The Agency City of La Quinta Ongoing fence (or the functional equivalent) between the shall development and the hillside shall be constructed. The guarantee to gaps should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less. If pay determined necessary, the City shall construct the design and temporary fencing while permanent fencing is construction constructed. The fence shall not contain gaps in which costs for the Bighorn Sheep can be entangled. If the Agency transfer fencing, and or disposes of any of the property adjacent to the that if the hillside, the Agency shall reserve an easement sufficient property for the construction of fencing if needed in the future. is transferred, it shall require that the subsequent owner bond or posts sufficient security for the completion of the fence should it arise in the future. -7- 373 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Dogs shall not be permitted to be loose within the Review of City of La Quinta Ongoing project area, and shall be kept away from the hillside landscape and areas through appropriate signage and fencing, where signage plan applicable. Access into the hillside area from the site will be Review of site City of La Quinta, Prior to issuance of discouraged through the use of signs or barricades, if and signage CDFG, USFWS occupancy permit necessary, unless the access is provided as part of a trail plan system that is approved by the USFWS and CDFG. There is a potential The final design of the project shall insure that road and Review of site City of La Quinta Prior to the impact from driveways are designed to minimize headlight shine and issuance of grading nighttime light on from vehicles onto the hillside. construction permit wildlife plan There is a potential In all areas adjacent to the hillsides, non -glare glass Review of site City of La Quinta Prior to the impact from glare shall be used in new construction. Exterior building and issuance of and exterior lights shall not shine on the hillside. Exterior lighting construction building permit lighting on wildlife shall be kept at the safest possible minimum intensity plan and aimed away from the hillside. All swimming pools located on the Project Site shall be Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the fenced pursuant to City regulations. construction issuance of grading plan permit Potential impact to Prior to any construction or site preparation activities Verification of City of La Quinta, Prior to the mesquite hummock that would impact the 3.4 acres of mesquite hummock, receipt of CDFG issuance of grading habitat the agency or project developer shall enter into a financial permit Memorandum Of Understanding (MOU) with CDFG and security an appropriate non-profit organization whose purpose instrument is to acquire and manage land for the purpose of and copy of protecting special status plants and wildlife. This MOU the MOU shall provide the organization chosen the financial resources necessary to purchase and manage 3.4 acres of mesquite hummock in the Willow Hole area or in another area where the habitat is contiguous and large preserves already protect much of this habitat type. The exact location and cost shall be determined through consultation with CDFG and the selected organization. -8- 374 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Potential impact to Prior to the commencement of on -site grading, a 404 Receipt of City of La Quinta, Prior to the areas under the permit shall be obtained, if legally required, for required CDFG, ACOE issuance of grading jurisdiction of the alteration of areas under the ACOE jurisdiction. In permits permit ACOE and the CDFG addition, if development activities are to take place within streambeds or drainages under the jurisdiction of the CDFG, a streambed alteration agreement shall first be obtained, if legally required. Hazards Exposure to Prior to the demolition or renovation of the on -site Proof that a City of La Quinta Prior to the asbestos is a single family residence, asbestos containing materials qualified issuance of significant impact (ACM) shall be removed in accordance with current demolition demolition permit regulatory guidelines. team has been retained Noise Construction noise Between May 1 and September 30, all construction Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the would impact local activities on the project site shall only occur between construction issuance of grading residents and the hours of 6:00 AM and 7:00 PM Monday through plans permit sensitive receptors Friday, and from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday, and shall be prohibited on Sundays and public holidays. Between October 1 and April 30, all construction activity on the project site shall only occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 5:30 PM Monday through Friday, and from 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM on Saturday, and shall be prohibited on Sundays and public holidays. All operational activities of the Project shall also be subject to the Noise Ordinance of the City as well. All construction equipment operating in the planning Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the area shall be fitted with well -maintained functional construction issuance of grading mufflers to limit noise emissions. plans permit, ongoing throughout construction To the greatest extent feasible, earth moving and Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the hauling routes shall be located away from existing construction issuance of grading residences. plans permit The design, selection and placement of the mechanical Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the equipment for various buildings shall include construction issuance of consideration of the potential noise impact they may plans building permit have on uses within the development site. -9- 375 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Silencers and/or barriers shall be provided where Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the necessary at outdoor equipment, such as cooling construction issuance of towers, air cooled condensers and refrigeration plans building permit compressors/condenser units, and at the air intake and discharge openings for building ventilation systems. Public The proposed The Riverside County Fire Department, in its review of Review of site Riverside County Prior to the Services project would new development proposals, shall evaluate project and landscape Fire Department issuance of grading incrementally plans and the Department's ability to provide proper plan and City of La permit increase demand fire protection. This review shall include, but shall not Quinta for service on the be limited to, internal circulation, project directories, Riverside County street names, and numbering systems. New Fire Department developments shall comply with all City and Fire Department standards. The proposed The Riverside County Sheriff's Department shall review Review of site Riverside County Prior to the project would new development proposals in order to evaluate and landscape Sheriff issuance of grading incrementally project plans and the Department's ability to provide plan Department and permit increase demand adequate police protection. This review should City of La Quinta for service on the include, but not be limited to internal circulation, Riverside County project directories, street names, and numbering Sheriff Department systems. New developments shall comply with all established City and Sheriff standards. Utilities The project would The most efficient furnaces, water heaters, pool Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the and result in an heaters and other equipment that use natural gas shall construction issuance of Service incremental be used in project construction. The use of kitchen plan building permits Systems increase in appliances that use natural gas and alternative, electrical demand renewable energy sources, including solar and wind turbine technologies shall also be used to the greatest extent feasible. Title 24 of the California Administrative Code, which Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the addresses energy conservation in all proposed uses construction issuance of shall be strictly enforced in project design and plan building permits construction. The use of septic All planned uses shall be connected to the city-wide Review of Coachella Valley Prior to issuance of systems in the City sewer system. construction Water District grading permit could result in plan potential impacts -10- 376 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Any existing or historic septic systems located on the Review of Coachella Valley Prior to issuance of site shall be abandoned in accordance with Federal, construction Water District and grading permit State, and local laws and regulations prior to the plan City of La Quinta issuance of building permits. The incremental A recycling program shall be developed for all Receipt of City of La Quinta Prior to the increase in solid proposed uses. Recycling provisions for commercial recycling issuance of waste generation and business establishments should include separate program occupancy permit could result in recycling bins. Items to be recycled at commercial potential impacts establishments may include white paper, computer legal paper, cardboard, glass and aluminum cans. Professional landscaping services from companies Verification City of La Quinta Prior to the which compost green waste shall be utilized. that a issuance of qualified occupancy permit landscaping service has been retained The incremental The Projects fair share of public utilities, infrastructure Verification of City of La Quinta Prior to the demand from the and improvements required to properly service the receipt of issuance of grading project on utility proposed uses shall be determined through financial permit systems could consultation with the City Department of Public Works security result in potential and paid prior to the issuance of grading permits. instrument. impacts Aesthetics The project area is Landscape designs and materials that complement the Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the adjacent to a scenic native desert environment shall be utilized in project landscape and issuance of grading area. Development design and construction. design plans permit would alter the aesthetic nature of the area Overhead utility lines shall be undergrounded to the Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the greatest extent possible through the establishment of design and Public Works and issuance of grading an undergrounding program and guidelines subject to site plans City Engineer permit the review of the City Engineer and Public Works Department. Signage shall be limited to the locations, sizes, and Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the maintenance requirements necessary to provide design plan issuance of grading functional identification. permit -11- 377 Env. Issue Area Potential Env. Impact Mitigation Measure Method of Review Verification Responsible Agency Monitoring Milestone Verification of Compliance Initial I Date I Remarks Safe, convenient vehicular and pedestrian circulation, Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the screened outdoor storage/loading and other unsightly landscape and issuance of areas, protected and enhanced outdoor seating areas, design plans building permit appropriate lighting levels, limited signage, and landscaping designs that preserve and enhance visual resources shall be included in the design of any commercial area on the Project Site. Development proposed along designated scenic Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the highways, roadways and corridors shall be reviewed for landscape and issuance of grading compatibility with the natural and built environments design plans permit to assure maximum viewshed protection and pedestrian and vehicular activity. All grading and development proposed within scenic Review of City of La Quinta Prior to the viewsheds, shall be regulated to minimize adverse landscape and issuance of grading impacts to these viewsheds. All grading, development design plans permit and landscaping plans shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of grading permits. The project would Outdoor lighting shall be limited to the minimum Review of City of La Quinta, Prior to the introduce new height, number of fixtures, and intensity needed to design and Riverside County issuance of sources of light and provide sufficient security and identification in each site plans Sheriff building permit glare that would development, making every reasonable effort to Department alter the existing protect the community's night skies. nighttime environment Cultural There is potential During any ground altering activities associated with Verification City of La Quinta Prior to issuance of Resources for discovery of project grading or construction, including demolition of that a grading permit unidentified existing modern structures and facilities, the project qualified subsurface cultural area shall be monitored by a qualified archaeological historical resources during monitor. The monitor shall have the authority to halt consultant has future ground any activities impacting potentially significant cultural been retained altering activities resources until the resources can be evaluated for significance and cleared or mitigated. The monitoring program shall also include consultation with the local Native American representatives (e.g., Torres -Martinez and/or Morongo Reservations). -12- 378 mw� VANtoo Z; lAlijo eraq�7 -AIR Wy lit EERY fa W, eA 71 44j jo AjAia, M 1, �Jl Wolin 7 04 J* , kri-n-I zi; Wilt gift'. MOM MEN hZ _7 1 ton Ol 40 L Q., IRWIN. 380 ATTACHMENT 7 CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL 2016-0004 SRR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 Appeal Condition of Approval CC-1 A. City Council Authority. This condition to modify the original decision of the Planning Commission for Site Development Permit 2016-0005 is binding on the City pursuant to its police power and applicant pursuant to Section 9.200.120(D)(6) of the La Quinta Municipal Code and shall take effect immediately upon its adoption as part of the Appeal of Planning Commission Decision, Case No. Appeal 2016-0004 (Administrative Appeal). This condition is incorporated into the approval for Site Development Permit 2016-005 by this reference, and all other conditions of approval set forth by the Planning Commission for Site Development Permit 2016-0005 remain in full force and effect. B. Intent. The intent of this condition is to protect Peninsular Big Horn Sheep ferfrom impacts related to the approximately 525 acres of property known as The SilverRock Resort pursuant to the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Communities Conservation Plan (MSHCP), the Mitigation Monitoring Program included in the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum for the SilverRock Resort Specific Plan (SRR Mitigation Measures), that certain Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014, by and between the SilverRock Development Company, LLC (Developer) and the City (the DA), and that certain Purchase, Sale, and Development Agreement dated November 19, 2014, by and between Developer and the City (the PSDA). - C. Immediate Construction of Temporary Fencing. Within 15 days after the decision of the hearing of the Administrative Appeal, the City shall solicit bids for the construction of temporary fencing:, and within 45 days of the bid solicitation, award a contract to the lowest responsible bidder. Within 21 days after the award to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, construction of the temporary fencing shall commence. The completion of construction for the temporary fencing shall be as soon as possible after commencing construction, not to exceed a period of 30 days for total construction. Prior to the issuance of any grading, demolition, construction, or building permit, the construction of the temporary fencing shall be completed. For purposes of this condition, "temporary fencing" or "temporary fence" means an 8-foot high fence between the SilverRock Resort development and hillside as identified in the SilverRock Resort Fence Location Site Plan attached as Exhibit "A" to this condition and incorporated by reference (Fencing Site Plan). The temporary fencing shall have gaps that should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less, and shall not contain gaps in which Big Horn Sheep can be entangled. If and/or when the City transfers or disposes of any of the SilverRock Resort property adjacent to the hillside to the applicant, the City shall reserve an easement, and the applicant shall grant an easement, sufficient for the construction and maintenance of the temporary fencing until such time as the permanent fencing or functional equivalent (as described below) is completed. The temporary fencing on City -owned property at SilverRock Resort shall be maintained by the City and on Developer -owned property shall be maintained by Developer until such time as the permanent fencing or functional equivalent is completed. 698/015610-0065 381 10413596.1 a12/19/16 D. Construction of Permanent Fencing or Functional Equivalent. Prior to the issuance of a "grand opening" of the SilverRock Resort as improved pursuant to the DA and PSDA, construction of the permanent fencing or functional equivalent shall be completed. For purposes of this condition, "permanent fencing or functional equivalent" or "permanent fence" means an 8-foot high fence or other barrier that prevents Big Horn Sheep from accessing SilverRock Resort, constructed of durable material or natural landscaping elements approved by t-4eU.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Coachella Valley Conservation Commission, City and applicant in a location that, upon completion of construction, will be within 1-10 feet of the temporary fence line as identified on the Fencing Site Plan:, unless all approving parties agree to an alternative alignment. The permanent fence shall have gaps that should be 11 centimeters (4.3 inches) or less, and shall not contain gaps in which Big Horn Sheep can be entangled. If and/or when the City transfers or disposes of any of the SilverRock Resort property adjacent to the hillside to the applicant, the City shall reserve an easement, and the applicant shall grant an easement, sufficient for access to nni-I (if ReceSSGr, construction of -and maintenance of) the permanent fence. The permanent fence on City -owned property at SilverRock Resort shall be maintained by the City and on Developer -owned property shall be maintained by Developer. For purposes of this condition, "grand opening" of the SilverRock Resort means the opening to the general public of the new resort improvements consisting of the Luxury Hotel, Lifestyle Hotel, Conference and Shared Service Facility, Resort Residential Village, and dwelling unit that are part of the Luxury Branded Residential Development, Lifestyle Branded Residential Development, Promenade Mixed -Use Development, or Resort Residential Village (all as those terms are defined in the PSDA). The anticipated date of the grand opening for reference purposes only is May 2019. E. Periodic Review for Environmental Impacts. After the completion of construction of the temporary fencing and until the completion of construction of the permanent fence, the City and applicant shall coordinate with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and/or Coachella Valley Conservation Commission (collectively, the other governmental agencies) to review the effectiveness of the temporary fencing o-r--and final design of the permanent fencing (or functional equivalent)-.. If the review indicates that fence modifications, such as additional height or reinforcement, are required to protect bighorn sheep, the modifications shall be implemented. If review of environmental impacts advocates for a relocation of the temporary fencing or permanent fencing {or use of some type of functional equivalent) to protect Big Hamfthorn Sheep, tl,nt ro"io,A, and r e I e c a innthe alternative location or method of protecting Bighorn sheep may be considered and used by the City and/or the applicant only if they are consistent with any and nil approvals first approved by_ U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, and/or Coachella Valley Conservation Commission. F. Enforcement. This "CONDITION OF APPROVAL FOR ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL 2016- 0004, SRR SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2016-0005 ("Appeal Condition") may be enforced by the Appellants Sierra Club and Center for Biological Diversity. Enforcement shall be limited to an action in Superior Court to compel performance. -2- EXHIBIT "A" FENCE SITE PLAN (Attached) 383 ATTACHMENT 7 - DCHIBITA Attachment A: SilverRock Temporary Chain Link Fence Tradition to CVWD Canal us y i r� e, + j ; e ,L, 41� r V r: r ' � l , :: 'S : , a. '.:.:. `s„_�-µ".. � xx � y r, ,� ., I ��.. r,�'• tF,�i- �Js •,}4,-xi�°i�vr,�w, r jy • LL h 4 s q : •'� . � ' i'I •a •: to T< yy h. t,t .l - r .af y" _ - - ✓iy,x x, t, �' h`; 7,g' Ic K�. x, r,[- 1," -•> $ Y' _jih T ,.s' wt, ' �r �•a' '� Z .M�'i >3Y -:J �, - - i - : (. _ �T�I _ of � �,�''� ate? �� x � ,f � � �• �,,, ;� .r ,R ;3;w � x y 't-.• �. rrJ a �'�� -F, ✓A �� f - ., ,�,,, '�'+..y j±'� r ..„;.. ?"�.s i, • '� 4r" :: f.� '-:?: .fir• • ..ley � 4. yA 'a'fi •r - :: „ rl�t °d, -' AT ..... i... .:. �- . ..�•. •t.a� \<.. ,.. �r' J'.. �, �„ �ai_. '"'j r�l. _ '�' ., '.. �.i�•1 �, .: ,, � �Y,r,•' \ .. .r...i'R ..�- :1 � .�'.., �..f art. .{L `f i 4 G r, ,r'r �' 'IMPORTANT* Maps and data are to be used for reference purposes only. Map features are approximate, and are not necessarily accurate to surveying or engineering standards. The County of Riverside makes no warranty or guarantee as to the content (the R�,T source is often third party), accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any of the data provided, and assumes no legal responsibility for the information contained on this map. Any use of this product with respect to accuracy and precision shall be the sole responsibility of the user. 0 632 1,265 Feet REPORT PRINTED ON... 11/22/2016 8:58:09 AM © Riverside County RCIT GIS Legend ❑ Display Parcels roadsanno highways HWY INTERCHANGE INTERSTATE OFFRAMP ONRAMP USHWY i-i counties cities hydrographylines waterbodies Lakes Rivers Notes Approximately 6,300 lineal feet 384