Loading...
2025 12 16 Councilta Qaigra GF.M of'the DESERT — City Council agendas and staff reports are available on the City's web page: www.LaQuintaCA.pov CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 CITY COUNCIL WAS PULLED AND CONSIDERED AGENDA AS BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. A CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBER 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING ON TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2025 3:30 P.M. CLOSED SESSION 1 4:00 P.M. OPEN SESSION Members of the public may listen to this meeting by tuning -in live via www.laguintaca.gov/livemeetings- past meetings are available through the video archive via www.laguintaca.gov/pastmeetings Closed captions in English and Spanish are available to all users through this video streaming service. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers: Fitzpatrick, McGarrey, Pena, Sanchez, and Mayor Evans PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda pursuant to the "Public Comments — Instructions" listed at the end of the agenda. The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA CLOSED SESSION CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION; PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9-1 CASES NAMES AND NUMBERS — MULTIPLE (listed below, all in U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware) CASE NAME: CASE NUMBER SilverRock Development Company, LLC 24-11647 SilverRock Lifestyle Residences, LLC 24-11648 SilverRock Lodging, LLC 24-11650 SilverRock Luxury Residences, LLC 24-11652 SilverRock Phase I, LLC 24-11654 RGC PA 789, LLC 24-11657 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 1 of 8 DECEMBER 16, 2025 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL — EXISTING LITIGATION; PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (1) OF SUBDIVISION (d) OF GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9; NAME OF CASE: CITY OF LA QUINTA V. SILVERROCK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, ET AL. (RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUP. CT. CASE NO. CVPS2404750) RECESS TO CLOSED SESSION RECONVENE AT 4:00 P.M. REPORT ON ACTION(S) TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA At this time, members of the public may address the City Council on any matter not listed on the agenda pursuant to the "Public Comments — Instructions" listed at the end of the agenda. The City Council values your comments; however, in accordance with State law, no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the agenda unless it is an emergency item authorized by the Brown Act [Government Code § 54954.2(b)]. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS SILVERROCK (FORMERLY TALUS) DEVELOPMENT PROJECT— STATUS UPDATE 2. AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA CHAPTER — AWARDED THE 2025 PROJECT OF THE YEAR B.E.S.T. (BUILDING EXCELLENCE, SHAPING TOMORROW) AWARD TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA FOR THE DUNE PALMS BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2011-05 CONSENT CALENDAR NOTE: Consent Calendar items are routine in nature and can be approved by one motion. PAGE 1. ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 627 ON SECOND READING AMENDING TITLE 8 OF 9 THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE WITH LOCAL AMENDMENTS 2. EXCUSE ABSENCE OF VICE CHAIRPERSON WEBB FROM THE DECEMBER 69 8, 2025, ARTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION QUARTERLY MEETING 3. Pulled from Consent Calendar by Mayor Evans and considered as Business 71 Session Item No. A >>> APPROVE RECIPIENT F THE 226 LA QUINTA SENIOR INSPIROTI(lnl AWARD CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 2 of 8 DECEMBER 16, 2025 4. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ANNUAL REPORT 5. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FEE REPORT 6. RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 MEASURE G SALES TAX COMPLIANCE REPORT 7. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED OCTOBER 31, 2025 8. APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED NOVEMBER 14 AND 21, 2025 BUSINESS SESSION PAGE A. Pulled from Consent Calendar (Item No. 3) by Mayor Evans and considered as 71 Business Session Item No. A >>> APPROVE RECIPIENT OF THE 2026 LA QUINTA SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARD 1. APPOINT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE AS MAYOR PRO TEMPORE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2026 2. APPOINT MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE ON VARIOUS OUTSIDE AGENCIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2026 3. APPROVE RECIPIENTS OF THE PILLAR OF THE COMMUNITY AWARD 143 4. ADOPT RESOLUTION TO: (1) APPROPRIATE FUNDING FROM GENERAL 163 FUND UNASSIGNED RESERVES, (2) APPROVE TRANSFER OF FUNDING FROM CITY TO THE LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY THROUGH A FINANCING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE FINANCING AUTHORITY FOR THE PURCHASE OF CERTAIN LONG LEAD-TIME POWER EQUIPMENT AND RESERVATION OF POWER CAPACITY, AND (3) APPROVE TWO AGREEMENTS WITH IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT RELATED TO THE AVENUE 58 SUBSTATION ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND PROCUREMENT OF CERTAIN POWER EQUIPMENT [RESOLUTION NO. 2025-028] STUDY SESSION — None PUBLIC HEARINGS — 5:00 p.m. or thereafter For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the City Clerk prior to consideration of that item; comments are limited to three (3) minutes (approximately 350 words). CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 3 of 8 DECEMBER 16, 2025 Any person may submit written comments to the City Council prior to the public hearing and/or may appear and be heard in support of or opposition to the project(s) at the time of the public hearing. If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at or prior to the public hearing. PAGE ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT 213 APPLICATIONS TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY HOUSING AND WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND EXECUTE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/27 [RESOLUTION NO. 2025-029] 2. CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF 221 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF THE 384 ACRE SITE, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GOLF COURSE, PERIMETER LANDSCAPE, AND SALES CENTER; PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB; LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET [RESOLUTION NO. 2025-0301 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. CITY MANAGER 2. CITY ATTORNEY 3. CITY CLERK 4. COMMUNITY SERVICES 5. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT 6. FINANCE 7. PUBLIC SAFETY 8. PUBLIC WORKS MAYOR'S AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS 1. CVAG CONSERVATION COMMISSION (Evans) 2. CVAG ENERGY AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE (Evans) 3. CVAG EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (Evans) 4. VISIT GREATER PALM SPRINGS CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU (Evans) 5. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES DELEGATE (Evans) 6. COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT JOINT POLICY COMMITTEE (Evans) 7. COACHELLA VALLEY POWER AGENCY JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT (Evans) 8. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT SUBCOMMITTEE (Evans & Fitzpatrick) 9. DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Evans & Sanchez) 10. DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & McGarrey) 11. COACHELLA VALLEY UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick & Pena) 12. RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION (Fitzpatrick) CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 4 of 8 DECEMBER 16, 2025 13. CVAG TRANSPORTATION COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 14. COMMUNITY SERVICE GRANT REVIEW COMMITTEE (McGarrey & Pena) 15. COACHELLA VALLEY MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY (McGarrey) 16. GREATER CV CHAMBER OF COMMERCE INFORMATION EXCHANGE COMMITTEE (Fitzpatrick) 17. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY POLICY COMMITTEE (McGarrey) 18. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RIVERSIDE COUNTY DIVISION (McGarrey) 19. CANNABIS AD HOC COMMITTEE (Pena & Sanchez) 20. CVAG PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Pena) 21. CVAG HOMELESSNESS COMMITTEE (Pena) 22. COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO AND VECTOR CONTROL DISTRICT (Pena) 23. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY (Pena) 24. ART PURCHASE COMMITTEE (Evans & Fitzpatrick) 25. CALIFORNIA JOINT POWERS INSURANCE AUTHORITY (Sanchez) 26. CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (Sanchez) 27. COACHELLA VALLEY ANIMAL CAMPUS COMMISSION (Sanchez) 28. LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES — PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE (Sanchez) 29. RIVERSIDE COUNTY AIRPORT LAND USE COMMISSION (Sanchez) 30. RIVERSIDE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION (Sanchez) 31. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (Sanchez) 32. SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS REGIONAL COUNCIL (Sanchez) 33. ARTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 1133 DATED SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 34. HOUSING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 1137 35. FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES DATED 1141 NOVEMBER 5, 2025 ADJOURNMENT ********************************* The regular City Council meetings of January 6, 2025, has been cancelled. The next regular meeting of the City Council will be held on January 20, 2025, at 4:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chamber, 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Monika Radeva, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta City Council meeting was published on the City's website in the "Calendar / Public Meetings" direct link from the City's home page, and posted at the following freely accessible bulletin board to members of the public, located near the entrance to the Council Chamber at 78495 Calle Tampico on December 12, 2025. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 5 of 8 DECEMBER 16, 2025 DATED: December 12, 2025 V MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Public Notices • Agenda packet materials are available for public inspection: 1) at the Clerk's Office at La Quinta City Hall, located at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253; and 2) on the City's website at https://www.laguintaca.gov/our-city/city-government/public- meetings in accordance with the Brown Act [Government Code § 54957.5 • The La Quinta City Council Chamber is wheelchair accessible. If hearing assistance equipment is needed, please call the City Clerk's office at (760) 777-7147, 24-hours in advance of the meeting and accommodation will be made. • If background material is to be presented to the City Council during a City Council meeting, please be advised that 15 copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the City Clerk for distribution. It is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. PUBLIC COMMENTS - INSTRUCTIONS Members of the public may address the City Council on any matter listed or not listed on the agenda as follows: WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided either in -person during the meeting by submitting 15 copies to the City Clerk, it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting; or can be emailed in advance to CityClerkMail(a�LaQuintaCA.gov, no later than 12:00 p.m., on the day of the meeting. Written public comments will be distributed to Council, made public, and will be incorporated into the public record of the meeting, but will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of public comments is asked to be reported. If written public comments are emailed, the email subject line must clearly state "Written Comments" and should include: 1) full name, 2) city of residence, and 3) subject matter. VERBAL PUBLIC COMMENTS can be provided in -person during the meeting by completing a "Request to Speak" form and submitting it to the City Clerk; it is requested that this takes place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Please limit your comments to three (3) minutes (or approximately 350 words). Members of the public shall be called upon to speak by the Mayor. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 6 of 8 DECEMBER 16, 2025 In accordance with City Council Resolution No. 2022-027, a one-time additional speaker time donation of three (3) minutes per individual is permitted; please note that the member of the public donating time must: 1) submit this in writing to the City Clerk by completing a "Request to Speak" form noting the name of the person to whom time is being donated to, and 2) be present at the time the speaker provides verbal comments. Members of the public who utilize a translator shall be provided at least twice of the allotted time to ensure non-English speakers receive the same opportunity to directly address the Council. Verbal public comments are defined as comments provided in the speakers' own voice and may not include video or sound recordings of the speaker or of other individuals or entities, unless permitted by the Mayor. Public speakers may elect to use printed presentation materials to aid their comments; 15 copies of such printed materials shall be provided to the City Clerk to be disseminated to the City Council, made public, and incorporated into the public record of the meeting; it is requested that the printed materials are provided prior to the beginning of the meeting. There shall be no use of Chamber resources and technology to display visual or audible presentations during public comments, unless permitted by the Mayor. All writings or documents, including but not limited to emails and attachments to emails, submitted to the City regarding any item(s) listed or not listed on this agenda are public records. All information in such writings and documents is subject to disclosure as being in the public domain and subject to search and review by electronic means, including but not limited to the City's Internet Web site and any other Internet Web -based platform or other Web -based form of communication. All information in such writings and documents similarly is subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public Records Act [Government Code § 7920.000 et seq.]. TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY — INSTRUCTIONS Teleconference accessibility may be triggered in accordance with AB 2449 (Stats. 2022, Ch. 285), codified in the Brown Act [Government Code § 54953], if a member of the City Council requests to attend and participate in this meeting remotely due to `just cause" or "emergency circumstances," as defined, and only if the request is approved. In such instances, remote public accessibility and participation will be facilitated via Zoom Webinar as detailed at the end of this Agenda. *** TELECONFERENCE PROCEDURES*** APPLICABLE ONLY WHEN TELECONFERENCE ACCESSIBILITY IS IN EFFECT Pursuant to Government Code § 54953(f) [AB 2449, Stats. 2022, Ch. 285, Rubio]. Verbal public comments via Teleconference — members of the public may attend and participate in this meeting by teleconference via Zoom and use the "raise your hand" CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 7 of 8 DECEMBER 16, 2025 feature when public comments are prompted by the Mayor; the City will facilitate the ability for a member of the public to be audible to the City Council and general public and allow him/her/them to speak on the item(s) requested. Please note — members of the public must unmute themselves when prompted upon being recognized by the Mayor, in order to become audible to the City Council and the public. Only one person at a time may speak by teleconference and only after being recognized by the Mayor. ZOOM LINK: https://us06web.zoom.us/m/86171130130 Meeting ID: 861 7113 0130 Or join by phone: (253) 215 — 8782 Written public comments — can be provided in person during the meeting or emailed to the City Clerk's Office at CityClerkMail(a)_LaQuintaCA.gov any time prior to the adjournment of the meeting, and will be distributed to the City Council, made public, incorporated into the public record of the meeting, and will not be read during the meeting unless, upon the request of the Mayor, a brief summary of any public comment is asked to be read, to the extent the City Clerk's Office can accommodate such request. Closed Caption and Translation — are accessible through the Zoom Webinar audiovisual platform and accessible in real-time to all teleconference participants. CITY COUNCIL AGENDA Page 8 of 8 DECEMBER 16, 2025 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETIN( December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 627 ON SECOND READING AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE WITH LOCAL AMENDMENTS RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance No. 627 on second reading amending Title 8 of the La Quinta Municipal Code and adopting the 2025 California Building Standards Code with local amendments. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) recently adopted the 2025 California Building Standards Code (Code) (Attachment 1). • On December 2, 2025, Council introduced Ordinance No. 627 for first reading amending Title 8 of the La Quinta Municipal Code by adopting by reference the Code with local amendments. • If adopted the Code will go into effect January 1, 2026, with the local amendments going into effect 30 days after adoption, or on January 15, 2026. FISCAL IMPACT — None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The CBSC is responsible for overseeing the adoption, approval and publication of the California Building Standards Code, Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations. Title 24 is published by CBSC and contains building standards divided into 13 "parts" that apply to all building occupancies throughout the state. Title 24 is published in its entirety every 3 years and applies automatically on January 1st of the coinciding triennial code adoption cycle. New to the building standards is the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, which integrates wild -fire related construction standards to reduce risk to life and structures. The regulations include requirements for building materials, construction, fire resistant landscaping, water supply, and emergency vehicle access. 9 Historically, Council has elected to adopt more restrictive requirements than what has been established by CBSC because of local climatic, geological, or topographical conditions. The City's Building Official and the Riverside County Fire Marshal have recommended changes and modifications be made to the Code and have advised that certain of said changes are reasonably necessary due to local conditions. A summary of the recommended amendments is attached (Attachment 2). If adopted, Ordinance No. 627 will adopt the State -mandated Code with the City's local amendments encompassing, but not limited to, the following: • Reduction in size of non-sprinklered buildings and requiring sprinkler retrofitting in building additions. • Requirement for increased fire classification of roofing assemblies. • Limitation in the use of aluminum wiring in electrical installations. • Permitting only underground electrical service installations in New Construction. • Make Home Hardening and Defensible Space also applicable in the "Moderate" Fire Hazard Severity Zone. kLTERNATIVES As Council introduced Ordinance No. 627 at first reading, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Olivia Rodriguez, Deputy City Clerk Approved by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Attachments: 1. Summary of 2025 CBSC updates 2. Summary of proposed local amendments 10 ORDINANCE NO. 627 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 8 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADOPTING BY REFERENCE THE 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING STANDARDS CODE AND CERTAIN SPECIFIED APPENDICES THEREOF, INCLUDING THE 2025 CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE; 2025 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE; 2025 CALIFORNIA RESIDENTIAL CODE; 2025 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE; 2025 MECHANICAL CODE; 2025 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE; 2025 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE; 2025 CALIFORNIA WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE CODE; 2025 CALIFORNIA HISTORICAL BUILDING CODE; 2025 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE; 2025 CALIFORNIA EXISTING BUILDING CODE; 2025 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS CODE; AND 2025 CALIFORNIA REFERENCED STANDARDS CODE, AND MAKING FINDINGS OF LOCAL CONDITIONS WITHIN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA WHICH MAKE CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE CALIFORNIA BUILDINGS STANDARDS CODE REASONABLY NECESSARY WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 17958 and 18941.5 mandates that the City of La Quinta adopt ordinances or regulations imposing the requirements of certain uniform industry codes adopted by the State pursuant to Health & Safety Code Section 17922; and WHEREAS, the State of California has adopted the 2025 editions of the California Administrative Code, California Building Code, the California Residential Code, the California Electrical Code, the California Mechanical Code, the California Plumbing Code, the California Energy Code, the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, the California Historical Building Code, the California Fire Code, the California Existing Building Code, the California Green Building Standards Code, and the California Referenced Standards Code, known collectively as the California Building Standards Code, and comprising Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations; and WHEREAS, the California Building Standards Code establishes minimum standards to regulate the construction of buildings throughout the State; and WHEREAS, California Health & Safety Code Section 17958.5 permits the City of La Quinta to make such changes and modifications to the California Building Standards Code as are reasonably necessary because of local conditions; and WHEREAS, the Building Official, the Design and Development Director, and the Riverside County Fire Marshal have recommended that changes and modifications be made to the California Building Standards Code and have advised that certain of said changes are reasonably necessary due to local conditions in the City of La Quinta and have further advised that the remainder of said changes and modifications are of an administrative or procedural nature, or concern themselves with subjects not covered by the California Building Standards Code or are reasonably necessary to safeguard life and property within the City of La Quinta. 11 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 2 of 9 WHEREAS, the changes or modifications are substantially equivalent to changes or modifications that were previously filed by the governing body of the City and were in effect as of September 30, 2025, and otherwise relate to home hardening as regulated by the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, which are specific exemptions within Assembly Bill 130 (AB 130, Chapter 22, Statutes of 2025). WHEREAS, this ordinance aligns with the adopted greenhouse gas reduction strategy and general plan approved on or before June 10, 2025, and incentivizes all - electric construction and complies with federal law in permitting mixed -fuel residential construction. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta finds and determines, pursuant to the requirements of Health & Safety Code Section 17958.7 and 18941.5, that there is a need to adopt the changes or modifications to the California Building Standards Code because of local climatic, topographical, and geological conditions, and does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Changes and modifications to the California Building Standards Code adopted by the City of La Quinta, as recommended by the Building Official, the Design and Development Director, and the Riverside County Fire Marshal are hereby found to be reasonably necessary due to the following general findings of local conditions: Climatic Conditions: A. La Quinta has an arid desert climate with rainfall averaging just over three inches annually, reducing the moisture content of combustible materials. Frequent periods of drought and low humidity contribute to the probability of a year-round fire season. B. For nearly four months each year, average daily high temperatures in La Quinta reach 100 degrees or higher, reducing the amount of added heat required to bring combustible materials to their ignition point. C. La Quinta is subject to hot, dry winds that further dry combustible materials, adding to the intensity of fires and their potential to spread rapidly. During the summer months the dry winds and existing vegetation mix to create a hazardous fuel condition which has resulted in large loss in vegetation and structure fires. Severe "Santa Ana" winds frequently occur and can move a fire quickly throughout areas of the City. Multiple shifting wind patterns throughout the canyon areas add to the difficulty in suppressing fires. D. High winds cause failures of electrical supply and telephone communication, reducing the reliability of water supply pumps and timely emergency notification. E. Because of weather patterns, water is a scarce commodity in desert environments, and La Quinta and its neighboring areas draw more water from the underground aquifer than is replenished naturally. As a result, the area is dependent upon imported water to reduce the effects of overdrafting from the aquifer. Limited storage capacities, high consumption, and droughts reduce 12 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 3 of 9 the dependability of future water allocations. Scarcity of water necessitates reducing the need for large volumes of water for firefighting efforts by early suppression through the installation of fire sprinklers in buildings that would otherwise be exempt from sprinkler requirements. F. Under desert conditions, aluminum wiring is more likely than copper to fail mechanically. Aluminum is more reactive than copper to ambient temperature changes as well as normal heating produced from the flow of electricity. It expands and contracts when subjected to heating and cooling, respectively, more so than does copper. Compared to copper, its lower electrical conductivity generates more heat. Aluminum is also more brittle than copper and is more likely to break or crimp. Arcing can occur if a wire breaks or crimps, causing very high temperatures inside concealed building spaces. Aluminum is more likely to corrode (i.e., oxidize) than copper. When excessive corrosion occurs, it increases the resistance in the circuit and causes overheating. All of these mechanisms of failure increase the risks of fire associated with the use of aluminum wire. G. The Coachella Valley's desert climate, marked by extreme heat, low humidity, and contrastingly cold winters with frequent frost warnings, places considerable strain on the region's power infrastructure. Delays in expanding electrical capacity have not only hindered the area's ability to accommodate ongoing residential growth but have also challenged the utility's capacity to meet the increasing energy demands of existing customers. Cold weather further complicates this issue by reducing the efficiency of heat pumps, which rely on extracting ambient heat from the outdoor air. As temperatures drop, less heat is available for transfer, forcing the system to work harder to maintain temperatures, resulting in higher energy consumption and reduced performance. These combined challenges, limited infrastructure and the seasonal inefficiency of electric -only systems, support the case for allowing mixed -fuel residential construction as a more resilient and adaptable solution. II. Topographical Conditions: A. La Quinta is separated from Los Angeles to the west and Phoenix to the east by mountainous terrain, isolating it from media broadcasts of news and emergency information originating from major metropolitan areas. B. Much of La Quinta, particularly the southern portion, is situated in alluvial fans, surrounded by mountains, isolating it from media broadcasts of news and emergency information originating from within the Coachella Valley. C. Major roadways, highways, and flood control channels create barriers that increase Fire Department response times. Undulating terrain incorporated into large country clubs also increases these response times. D. Streets designed for limited residential traffic and streets designed as storm drains impede emergency vehicle access and evacuation routes. 13 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 4 of 9 III. Geological Conditions: A. La Quinta is situated near several significant sources capable of producing moderate to large earthquakes, including the San Andreas, Garnet Hill, Banning, Eureka Peak, Burnt Mountain, Pinto Mountain, San Gorgonio Pass, and San Jacinto Faults. B. Faults near La Quinta are capable of producing earthquakes of Magnitude 7.8 or greater, accompanied by intense shaking, liquefaction, and permanent ground displacement, increasing the risk of property damage, or personal injury or death, caused by the failure of structures, necessitating the permitting and inspection of structures that would otherwise be exempt from permit requirements. C. Seismic activity within the area occurs yearly. As a result, existing structures and planned new development are subject to serious risks, including fire and collapse, disruption of the water supply for firefighting purposes, and isolation from emergency response as a result of bridge, overpass, and road damage and debris. D. Severe ground shaking during a seismic event increases the probability that above -ground structures will fail. The inherent danger to the public is increased when power lines are installed above ground because of the danger from falling or fallen power poles and the possibility of contacting live power lines. IV. Other Conditions: A. Additional amendments are found to be either administrative or procedural in nature or concern themselves with subjects not covered in the California Building Standards Code. These changes include provisions making the California Building Standards Code compatible with other codes enforced by the City. SECTION 2. As recommended by the Building Official, Design and Development Director, and the Riverside County Fire Marshal, the following local amendments to the 2025 California Building Standards Code are hereby found to be reasonably necessary as identified in the table below and referenced to the express findings noted in Section 1, above. Local Code Amendments and Express Findings of Necessity Code Legend: CBC = California Building Code; CRC = California Residential Code; CEC = California Electrical Code; CFC = California Fire Code; CWUIC = California Wildland-Urban Interface Code; CEnC = California Energy Code; LQMC = La Quinta Municipal Code Code Amended Section Express Finding LQMC 8.01.020 IV.A LQMC 8.01.030 IV.A 14 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 5 of 9 LQMC 8.02.050 IV.A CBC 105.2 III.A, III.B, IV.A CBC 903.2 LA, LB, I.C, II.D CBC 1505.1.5 LA, LB, I.C, II.D CEC 120 III.D CEC 310.1 I.F CRC R105.2 III.A, III.B, IV.A CRC R902.1.3 LA, LB, I.C, II.D CFC 101.1 IV.A CFC 101.4 IV.A CFC 102.5 I, II & III CFC 102.13.1 IV.A CFC 104.1.1 IV.A CFC 104.2 IV.A CFC 104.8 and 104.8.1 IV.A CFC 104.12 IV.A CFC 108.2 IV.A CFC 108.4 IV.A CFC 108.7 IV.A CFC 112.1 IV.A CFC 113.4 IV.A CFC 202 IV.A CFC 308.1.7 I, II & III CFC 503.1.2.1 I, 11, & III CFC 503.2.1 IV.A CFC 503.2.2 IV.A CFC 503.6.1 IV.A CFC 503.7 IV.A CFC 507.5.7 1 & III CFC 507.5.8 I, II & III CFC 508.1 I, II & III CFC 508.1.1 I, II & III CFC 508.1.3 I, II & III CFC 509.2.1 1 & III CFC 608.11.1.2 II & III CFC 903.2 I, II & III CFC 903.3.5.3 1 & II CFC 904.2.2.1 I, II & III CFC 3206.4.2 IV.A CFC 4107 I, II & III CFC 4107.1 I, II & III CFC 4107.2 I, II & III CFC 4107.2.1 I, II & III CFC 4107.2.2 I, II & III CFC 4107.2.3 I, II & III CFC 5608.1.2 IV.A 15 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 6 of 9 CFC 5608.2 I, II & III CFC B103.2.1 I, II & III CFC Table B105.2 I, II & III CFC C103.1 I, II & III CEnC 110.4 c I.G & IV.A CWUIC 102.4.1.1 IV.A CWUIC 104.1.1 IV.A CWUIC 104.2 IV.A CWUIC 104.8 and 104.8.1 IV.A CWUIC 105.2 IV.A CWUIC 108.2 IV.A CWUIC 108.7 IV.A CWUIC 109.3.7 IV.A CWUIC 202 IV.A CWUIC 302.1.1 IV.A CWUIC 501.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 602.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 602.3.2 I, II, & III CWUIC 603.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 603.3 I, II, & III CWUIC 603.3.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.3 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.3.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.6 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.7 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.7.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.7.2 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.7.3 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.2 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.2.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.2.2 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.2.3 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.2.3.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.3 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.3.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.4 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.4.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.4.2 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5.2 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5.3 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5.4 I, II, & III 16 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 7 of 9 CWUIC 604.8.5.5 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5.5.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5.5.2 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5.5.3 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5.6 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5.6.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5.6.2 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.8.5.7 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.9 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.11 I, II, & III CWUIC 604.11.3 I, II, & III CWUIC 607.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 607.1.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 607.2 I, II, & III CWUIC 608.1.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 608.2 I, II, & III CWUIC 608.2.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 609.2.7.1 I, II, & III CWUIC 609.2.7.2 I, II, & III CWUIC A102.1 I, II, & III CWUIC A105.1 I, II, & III CWUIC A105.4 I, II, & III SECTION 3. A copy of this Ordinance adopting the 2025 California Administrative Code, the 2025 California Building Code, the 2025 California Residential Code, the 2025 California Electrical Code, the 2025 California Mechanical Code, the 2025 California Plumbing Code, the 2025 California Energy Code, the 2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, the 2025 California Historical Building Code, the 2025 California Fire Code, the 2025 California Existing Building Code, the 2025 California Green Building Standards Code, and the 2025 California Referenced Standards Code, along with the findings, amendments, additions, and deletions, shall be filed with the California Building Standards Commission at 2525 Natomas Park Drive, Suite 130, Sacramento, CA 95833 by the City Clerk of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 4. ADOPTION OF BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS. There is hereby adopted an amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit A, to Title 8 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, entitled "Buildings and Construction," which is incorporated as fully as if set out in full herein, for the purpose of prescribing regulations governing conditions related to building and construction and activities including those certain documents specifically described in said Exhibit A, save and except certain specified portions which are hereinafter deleted, modified, or amended within various Chapters of said Title 8, of which documents being adopted by reference copies are on file with the Building Official and the same are also hereby adopted and incorporated as fully as if set out at length herein. 17 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 8 of 9 SECTION 5. SEVERABILITY: If any section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is, for any reason, held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have adopted this Ordinance and each and every section, subsection, subdivision, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one or more section, subsections, subdivisions, sentences, clauses, phrases, or portions thereof be declared unconstitutional. SECTION 6. EFFECTIVE DATE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption, but no sooner than January 1, 2026. SECTION 7. POSTING: The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council (Resolution No. 2022-027), shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance, and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the permanent record of Ordinances of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 8. CORRECTIVE AMENDMENTS: the City Council does hereby grant the City Clerk the ability to make minor amendments and corrections of typographical or clerical errors to Exhibit A to ensure consistency of all approved text amendments prior to the publication in the La Quinta Municipal Code. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held this 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick, Pena, Sanchez, and Mayor Evans NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: Councilmember McGarrey LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California W Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 9 of 9 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 19 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 1 of 43 EXHIBIT A Title 8 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, entitled "Buildings and Construction" shall be amended as follows: 1. Section 8.01.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Administrative Code" shall be amended to read as follows: Certain documents marked and designated as the "2025 California Administrative Code," published by the California Building Standards Commission, are adopted for establishing administrative, organizational and enforcement rules and regulations for technical codes which regulate site preparation and construction, alteration, moving, demolition, repair, use and occupancy of buildings, structures and building service equipment. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. 2. Section 8.02.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Building Code" shall be amended to read as follows: Certain documents marked and designated as the "2025 California Building Code", Specifically Chapters 1 through 35, Appendix Chapter C (Group U—Agricultural Buildings), Appendix Chapter H (Signs), Appendix Chapter J (Grading), Appendix Chapter N (Replicable Buildings), Appendix Chapter P (Sleeping Lofts), and Appendix Chapter Q (Emergency Housing) within Volumes 1 and 2, published by the California Building Standards Commission are adopted for regulating the construction, alteration, movement, enlargement, replacement, repair, equipment, use and occupancy, location, maintenance, removal and demolition of every building or structure or any appurtenances connected or attached to such buildings or structures. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. 3. Section 8.02.020, entitled "Work exempt from permit" shall be readopted under the "2025" code, incorporating revised, new, and amended language to read as follows: Subsection 105.2 of Section 105 of the California Building Code is amended by deleting the subheading "Building" and its listed items 1 through 13 and replacing them with the following: 20 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 2 of 43 Building: One-story detached accessory structures used as tool and storage sheds, playhouses and similar uses, provided that the floor area does not exceed 120 square feet (11 m 2). It is permissible that these structures still be regulated by Part 7 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, despite exemption from permit. 2. Fences not over seven (7) feet (2134 mm) in height measured from finished grade and non -retaining masonry walls not over three (3) feet (914 mm) in height measured from top of footing, other than when used as a swimming pool drowning prevention safety feature. 3. Oil derricks. 4. Retaining walls that are not over 2 feet (609 mm in height measured from top of footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge or impounding Class I, II or IIIA liquids. 5. Water tanks supported directly on grade if the capacity is not greater than 5,000 gallons (18,925 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width is not greater than 2:1. 6. Sidewalks and driveways not more than 30 inches (762 mm) above adjacent grade, and not over any basement or story below and are not part of an accessible route. 7. Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops and similar finish work. 8. Temporary motion picture, television and theater stage sets and scenery. 9. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to a Group R-3 occupancy that are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep, are not greater than 5,000 gallons (18,925 L), and are installed entirely above ground. 10. Shade cloth structures constructed for nursery or agricultural purposes, not including service systems. 11. Swings and other playground equipment accessory to detached one- and two- family dwellings. 12. Window awnings in Group R-3 and U occupancies, supported by an exterior wall that do not project more than 54 inches (1,372 mm) from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. 13. Non -fixed and movable fixtures, cases, racks, counters and partitions not over 5 feet 9 inches (1,753 mm) in height. 21 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 3 of 43 4. Section 8.02.030, entitled "Automatic fire -extinguishing systems" shall be readopted under the "2025" code, incorporating revised, new, and amended language to read as follows: Section 903.2 of the 2025 California Building Code is amended to read as follows: 903.2 Where required. Approved automatic sprinkler systems shall be provided as follows: 1. In all new buildings and structures which are 3,600 square feet or greater, an approved automatic sprinkler system shall be provided regardless of occupancy classification. Where the Sections 903.2.1 — 903.2.21 of the California Building Code require more restrictive requirements than those listed below, the more restrictive requirement shall take precedence. 2. All existing buildings, except for one- and two-family dwellings, shall be retrofitted with automatic fire sprinklers when a structure exceeds 3,600 square feet and changes are made to the building including any of the following: change of use/occupancy, removal of an existing fire wall as defined by the California Building Code, or additions of 50% or more are made to the original building area and the resulting square footage exceeds 5,000 square feet . 3. One- and two-family dwellings shall have an automatic fire sprinkler system regardless of square footage in accordance with this Code or the California Residential Code, as applicable. Fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in mobile homes, manufactured homes and multifamily manufactured homes with two dwelling units in accordance with Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations. Exception: Unless required elsewhere in this code or the California Fire Code, automatic fire sprinkler systems shall not be required for the following: 1. Spaces or areas in telecommunications buildings used exclusively for telecommunications equipment, associated electrical power distribution equipment, batteries not required to have an automatic sprinkler system by California Fire Code Section 1207 for energy storage systems and standby engines, provided that those spaces or areas are equipped throughout with an automatic smoke detection system in accordance with Section 907.2 and are separated from the remainder of the building by not less than 1-hour fire barriers constructed in accordance with Section 707 of the California Building Code or not less than 2-hour horizontal assemblies constructed in accordance with Section 711 of the California Building Code, or both. 2. Detached Group U occupancies used for agricultural purposes. 3. Detached non-combustible equestrian arena shade canopies that are open on all sides and used for riding only - no commercial, assembly or storage uses. 4. Non-combustible fueling station canopies not exceeding 10,000 square feet when separated from other buildings by a distance of not less than 50 feet. 22 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 4 of 43 5. Detached fabric or non-combustible shade structures that are open on all sides and used to shade playground equipment, temporary storage of vehicles and dining areas with no cooking. 6. Where determined by the Fire Chief that no major life safety hazard exists, and the fuel load does not pose a significant threat to firefighter safety or to other structures or property, automatic fire sprinklers may be exempted. The following exceptions in the California Building Code shall not be allowed: Exception to Section 903.2.3. Exception to Section 903.2.11.3. 5. Section 8.02.040, entitled "Fire -retardant roofing materials required" shall be readopted under the "2025" code, with existing code amendment section deleted in its entirety and is replaced with updated numbering and new section naming to read as follows.. Section 8.02.040 — Roof covering materials. Section 1505.1.3 is added to the 2025 California Building Code to read as follows: 1505.1.4 Roof coverings within the City of La Quinta. With the exception of patio covers and similar structures, roof coverings shall be of a Class A rating and shall otherwise comply with the requirements of this code. Exception: When the existing roof covering is not a Class A rating and all of the following conditions exist: 1. The scope of work is an addition or roof repair, and; 2. The newly roofed area consists of less than 25 percent of the existing roof area. 6. Section 8.03.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Electrical Code" shall be amended read as follows: Certain documents marked and designated as the '2025 California Electrical Code," published by the California Building Standards Commission, are adopted for safeguarding persons and property from hazards arising from the use of electricity. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. 7. Section 8.03.020, entitled "Underground wiring required" shall be readopted under the "2025" code, with existing amended language revised to read as follows: 23 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 5 of 43 Article 120 of the 2025 California Electrical Code is added to read as follows: ARTICLE 120 Underground Wiring Required 120.1 Scope. This article covers the general requirements for restricting the installation of above -ground electrical and other utility components in new construction, and phasing out their use in existing installations. 120.2 Definitions. See Article 100. For the purposes of this article, the following additional definitions apply. Community Antenna Television System (or CATV). A system of antennas, coaxial cables, wires, wave guides, or other conductors, equipment, or facilities designed, constructed, or used for the purpose of providing television or FM radio service by cable or through its facilities. Cost of Replacing. Those costs as computed by the Building Official or his or her designee. In making said computation, said City Official shall use those tables and figures provided in that publication entitled "Building Standards," as published by International Code Council, Whittier, California, and which is current at the time of such computations. Said tables and figures shall apply to a building which would conform to all City and State Regulations, including the City's Building, Plumbing, Wiring, Mechanical, Fire Codes and Zoning Regulations, which are effective at the time of the computation. Poles, Wires, and Associated Structures. Poles, towers, supports, wires, crossarms, braces, transformers, insulators, cutouts, switches, communication circuits, appliances, attachments, and appurtenances used in whole or in part for supplying, distributing or transmitting electric energy, radio signals, television signals, telegraphic signals, CATV services, or any similar associated services to a building or structure and the occupants thereof, if any. Also referred to collectively in this article as "utility facilities." Utility. All persons or entities supplying, transmitting, or distributing electrical energy and service, radio signals, television signals, telegraphic signals, and providing telephone, electrical, light, radio, television, telegraphic, and CATV services or any similar associated services by means of poles, wires, and associated structures. 120.3 Prohibition. Except as provided in Article 120.4, no person shall construct, install, or place above the surface of the ground any poles, wires, and associated structures, regardless of the use or proposed use of the structure or building to be served thereby. 120.4 Exceptions. The provisions of this article shall not apply to the following poles, wires, and associated structures under the circumstances described herein: 24 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 6 of 43 (A) Termination Point for Overhead Utility Facilities. Utility facilities constructed, placed, or installed (referred to herein collectively as "constructed"), or proposed to be constructed within six feet of the lot line of any real property for which service is being or intended to be provided by said utility facilities, if the sole purpose of the construction of utility facilities is to terminate overhead utility facilities. Such utility facilities may be placed at a distance further than six feet from said lot line to enable a maximum underground run of two hundred feet. (B) Ground -mounted Equipment. Ground -mounted transformers, pedestal - mounted terminal boxes, meter cabinets, concealed ducts, and other appurtenances and associated equipment, which are part of and necessary for the operation of an underground electrical, communication, CATV, radio, or telegraphic system. (C) Temporary Facilities. Utility facilities installed by a utility for temporary purposes, including, but not limited to, servicing building construction projects for which valid building permits have been issued by the City, and which uses are being or proposed to be conducted in compliance with all requirements of this code, the remainder of the California Building Standards Code, and the La Quinta Municipal Code. (D) High Voltage Installations. Utility facilities distributing, supplying, and transmitting electrical energy at 34,000 Volts or greater. 120.5 Initial Obligation. The owner, lessee, tenant, or occupant of a building or structure or the owner of property proposed to be developed by a building or structure has the initial obligation to comply with all the requirements of this article, and in performance of said obligation shall make the necessary arrangements with the appropriate utility for the installation and construction of utility facilities so that they will be in compliance with the provisions of this article. This section is not intended to eliminate or limit the obligation of any person, including a utility, to comply at all times with all provisions of this article, but expresses the intent of the La Quinta City Council as to who has the primary obligation of compliance. 120.6 Waiver. If any person believes that the application of any provision of this article is impractical and will cause practical difficulties and unnecessary hardship to him or her or the public in general due to certain topographical conditions, street configurations, underground obstacle, soil, water or other natural conditions which would make the underground installation of utility facilities unreasonable, said person may apply in writing to the Design & Development Department for a waiver of such provision of this article. Said application shall be filed with the Design & Development Department and the City Council shall consider said application no later than thirty (30) days thereafter, at which time it shall hear the Applicant's evidence in support of the application, the comments and recommendations of the City's employees and officials thereon. It may hear other parties. The City Council may grant a waiver from all or any provisions of this article after considering a specific application therefor and after making a finding that the application of the 25 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 7 of 43 specific provision in question would be unreasonable, impractical and cause undue hardship to the Applicant or the general public. If the City Council does grant a waiver, it may impose reasonable conditions on said grant in the interest of protecting and preserving the public health, safety and general welfare. The City Council shall make its decision on the application no later than thirty (30) days after it has concluded its consideration thereof. The decision of the City Council shall be final. 120.7 Nonconformance: Continuance and Termination. (A) Nonconformance. Any legally established utility facility not in conformity with the provision of this article as of the effective date of this ordinance shall be considered nonconforming. (B) Nonconforming Utility Facilities Not Relocated. Any nonconforming utility facility may continue to be used and may be renewed, altered, enlarged, or have additions thereto in its existing location without any provisions of this article being applicable thereto. However, when any building or structure to which any nonconforming utility facility provides any service is enlarged or an addition is made thereto where the cost of replacing said building or structure including its addition or enlargement exceeds by 50 percent the cost of replacing said building or structure prior to its enlargement or the addition thereto, all utility facilities that provide service to such building or structure, as described in the aforesaid clause, shall be caused to comply with all provisions of this article. (C) Nonconforming Utility Facilities Relocated. Whenever an existing service is relocated on nonconforming property, or a new service is established on nonconforming property, any such relocated or new service shall be caused to comply with all the provisions of this article. 8. Section 8.03.030, entitled "Copper wire required" shall be readopted under the "2025" code, with existing amended language revised to read as follows: Section 310.10 of the 2025 California Electrical Code is amended to read as follows: 310.10 Uses Permitted. The conductors described in 310.104 shall be permitted for use in any of the wiring methods covered in Chapter 3 and as specified in their respective tables or as permitted elsewhere in this Code. However, aluminum conductors shall only be permitted for use to feed main electrical panels or sub -panels. Such aluminum conductors shall not be smaller than size 1/0 AWG. 9. Section 8.04.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Plumbing Code" shall be amended to read as follows: 26 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 8 of 43 Certain documents marked and designated as the "2025 California Plumbing Code," Specifically Chapters 1 through 17, including Table 4-1 (Occupant Load Factor) and Appendix Chapter A (Recommended Rules for Sizing the Water Supply System), Appendix Chapter B (Explanatory Notes in Combination Waste and Vent Systems), Appendix Chapter D (Sizing Storm Water Drainage Systems), Appendix Chapter H (Private Sewage Disposal Systems), Appendix Chapter I (Installation Standards), Append Chapter R (Tiny Houses), and Appendix S (Onsite Stormwater Treatment Systems), published by the California Building Standards Commission, are adopted for regulating the erection, installation, alteration, addition, repair, relocation, replacement, maintenance, or use of any plumbing system. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. 10. Section 8.04.020, entitled "Amendments to the California Plumbing Code" shall be added and read as follows: Section 8.04.020 — Amendments to the California Plumbing Code. Section 422.1 of the 2025 California Plumbing Code is amended to read as follows: 422.1 Fixture Count. Plumbing fixtures shall be provided for the type of building occupancy and in the minimum number shown in Table 422.1. The total occupant load and occupancy classification shall be determined in accordance with the California Building Code, or with the Occupant Load Factors in Table 4-1. Occupancy classification not shown in Table 422.1 shall be considered separately by the Authority Having Jurisdiction. 11. Section 8.05.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Mechanical Code" shall be amended to read as follows: Certain documents marked and designated as the "2025 California Mechanical Code," Specifically Chapters 1 through 18 and Appendix Chapter B (Procedures to be followed to place gas equipment in operation) and Appendix Chapter C (Installation and testing of oil (liquid) fuel -fired equipment), published by the California Building Standards Commission, are adopted for regulating and controlling the design, construction, installation, quality of materials, location, operation, and maintenance or use of heating, ventilating, cooling, refrigeration systems, incinerators, and other miscellaneous heat - producing appliances. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 9 of 43 12. Section 8.06.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Residential Code" shall be amended to read as follows: Certain documents marked and designated as the "2025 California Residential Code", Specifically Chapters 1 through 10, Chapter 44, Appendix Chapter BB (Tiny Houses), Appendix Chapter BF (Patio Covers), Appendix Chapter BI (Light Straw -clay Construction), Appendix Chapter BJ (Strawbale Construction), Appendix Chapter BM (3D-Printed Building Construction), Appendix Chapter Cl (Swimming Pool Safety Act) and Appendix Chapter CJ (Emergency Housing), published by the California Building Standards Commission, are adopted for regulating the construction, alteration, movement, enlargement, replacement, repair, equipment, use and occupancy, location, maintenance, removal and demolition of every detached one- and two-family dwelling, townhouse not more than three stories above grade plane in height with a separate means of egress and structures accessory thereto. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. 13. Section 8.06.020, entitled "Work exempt from permit" shall be readopted under the "2025" code, incorporating revised, new, and amended language to read as follows: Subsection R105.2 of Section 105 of the California Residential Code is amended by deleting the subheading "Building" and its listed items 1 through 10 and replacing them with the following: Building: 1. Other than storm shelters, one-story detached accessory structures, provided the floor area does not exceed 120 square feet (11.15 m2). It is permissible that these structures still be regulated by Part 7 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, despite exemption from permit. 2. Fences not over seven (7) feet (2134 mm) in height measured from finished grade and non -retaining masonry walls not over three (3) feet (914 mm) in height measured from top of footing, other than when used as a swimming pool drowning prevention safety feature. 3. Retaining walls that are not over 2 feet (609 mm) in height measured from top of footing to the top of the wall, unless supporting a surcharge. 4. Water tanks supported directly upon grade if the capacity does not exceed 5,000 gallons (18,927 L) and the ratio of height to diameter or width does not exceed 2 to 1. 5. Sidewalks and driveways. W Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 10 of 43 6. Painting, papering, tiling, carpeting, cabinets, counter tops and similar finish work. 7. Prefabricated swimming pools accessory to a Group R-3 occupancy that are less than 24 inches (610 mm) deep, are not greater than 5,000 gallons (18,925 L), and are installed entirely above ground. 8. Swings and other playground equipment. 9. Window awnings supported by an exterior wall which do not project more than 54 inches (1,372 mm) from the exterior wall and do not require additional support. 10. Decks not exceeding 200 square feet (18.58 m2) in area, that are not more than 30 inches (762 mm) above grade at any point, are not attached to a dwelling, and do not serve the exit door required by Section R318.4. All such structures must comply with the setback and height requirements of the La Quinta Municipal Code, as applicable. Unless otherwise exempted, separate plumbing, electrical, and mechanical permits are required for the above -exempted items. 14. Section 8.06.030, entitled "Fire -retardant roofing materials required" shall be readopted under the "2025" code, with existing code amendment section deleted in its entirety and is replaced with updated numbering and new section naming to read as follows: Section 8.06.030 — Roof covering materials. Section R902.1.3 of the 2025 California Residential Code is added to read as follows: R902.1.3 Roof coverings within the City of La Quinta. With the exception of patio covers and similar structures, roof coverings shall be of a Class A rating and shall otherwise comply with the requirements of this code. Exception: When the existing roof covering is not a Class A rating and all of the following conditions exist: 1. The scope of work is an addition or roof repair, and; 2. The newly roofed area consists of less than 25 percent of the existing roof area. 15. Section 8.07.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Green Building Standards Code." shall be amended to read as follows: Certain documents marked and designated as the "2025 California Green Building Standards Code" Specifically Chapters 1 through 8, published by the California Building 29 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 11 of 43 Standards Commission are adopted to improve public health, safety and general welfare by enhancing the design and construction of buildings through the use of building concepts having a reduced negative impact or positive environmental impact and encouraging sustainable construction practices. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. 16. Section 8.08.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Fire Code" shall be amended to read as follows: Except as stated in this section or as amended in Section 8.08.020 of this chapter; all of the provisions and appendices of the 2025 California Fire Code, inclusive of all of the inclusions and exclusions set for in each chapter's matrix, are hereby adopted and shall apply to the city of La Quinta. In addition, the following provisions that are excluded in the 2025 California Fire Code are hereby adopted: Chapter 1, Division II of the California Fire Code is hereby adopted, (except that Sections 103.2 and 112.3 are not adopted); and Chapters 3, 25, and Sections 503, 510.2, 1103.2 and 5707, published by the California Building Standards Commission are adopted for the purpose of establishing the minimum requirements consistent with nationally recognized good practice for providing a reasonable level of life safety and property protection from the hazards of fire, explosion, or dangerous conditions in new and existing buildings, structures, and premises, and to provide safety to firefighters and emergency responders during emergency operations within the city. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter 17. Section 8.08.020, entitled "Amendments to the California Fire Code" is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 8.08.020 - Amendments to the California Fire Code. A. Scope and Administration. 1) Section 101.1 of the California Fire Code is amended as follows: 101.1 Title. These regulations shall be known as the La Quinta Fire Code, hereinafter referred to as "this code." 2) Section 101.4 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 101.4 Severability. If any provision, clause, sentence or paragraph of this code or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall be held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the other provisions of this code which 30 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 12 of 43 can be given effect without the invalid provision or application, and to this end, the provisions of this code are hereby declared to be severable. B. Applicability. 1) Section 102.5 of the California Fire Code is amended as follows: 102.5 Application of Residential Code. Where structures are designed and constructed in accordance with the California Residential Code, the provisions of this code shall apply as follows- 1 . Construction and design provisions of this code pertaining to the exterior of the structure shall apply including, but not limited to, premises identification, fire apparatus access and water supplies. Where interior or exterior systems or devices are installed, construction permits required by Section 105.6 of this code shall apply. 2. Administrative, operational and maintenance provisions of this code shall apply. 3. Automatic fire sprinkler system requirements of this code shall apply to detached accessory buildings 3,600 square feet or greater in accordance with Section 903.2. The provisions contained in Section 903.2.18 of the California Fire Code or Section R317.5.1 of the California Residential Code may be used for the design of the automatic fire sprinkler system for detached private garages. 2) A new Section 102.13.1 is added to Section 102.13 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 102.13.1 Application of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code. Where a conflict exists between the adopted provisions of the California Fire Code and the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, the more restrictive provisions shall apply. C. Duties and Powers of the Fire Code Official 1) A new Section 104.1.1 is added to Section 104.1 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 104.1.1 Authority of the Fire Chief and Fire Department. 1. The Fire Chief, Chief Deputy, or their designee, is authorized and directed to enforce all applicable State fire laws and provisions of this code and to perform such duties as directed by the City Council. 2. The Fire Chief, Chief Deputy, or their designee, is authorized to administer, interpret and enforce this code. Under the Fire Chief, Chief Deputy, or their designee's, direction, the Riverside County Fire Department is authorized to enforce ordinances of City of La Quinta pertaining to the following: 2.1. The prevention of fires. 2.2. The suppression or extinguishment of dangerous or hazardous fires. 2.3. The storage, use and handling of hazardous materials. 2.4. The installation and maintenance of automatic, manual and other private fire alarm systems and fire extinguishing equipment. 2.5. The maintenance and regulation of fire escapes. 31 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 13 of 43 2.6. The maintenance of fire protection and the elimination of fire hazards on land, in buildings, structures and other property, including those under construction. 2.7. The maintenance of means of egress. 2.8. The investigation of the cause, origin and circumstances of fire and unauthorized releases of hazardous materials. 3. The following persons are hereby authorized to interpret and enforce the provisions of this code and to make arrests and issue citations as authorized by law: 3.1. The Unit Chief, Peace Officers and Public Officers of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 3.2. The Fire Chief, Peace Officers and Public Officers of the Riverside County Fire Department. 3.3. The Riverside County Sheriff and any deputy sheriff. 3.4. The Police Chief and any police officer of any city served by the Riverside County Fire Department. 3.5. Officers of the California Highway Patrol. 3.6. Code Officers of the City of La Quinta. 3.7. Peace Officers of the California Department of Parks and Recreation. 3.8. The law enforcement officer of the Federal Bureau of Land Management. 2) Section 104.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted and replaced with the following: 104.2 Determination of compliance. The fire code official shall have the authority to determine compliance with this code, to render interpretations of this code and to develop policies, procedures, guidelines, standards, and information bulletins in order to clarify the application of its provisions. Such interpretations, policies, procedures: 1. Shall be in compliance with the intent and purpose of this code. 2. Shall not have the effect of waiving requirements specifically provided for in this code. 3. Shall be enforceable as part of this code. 3) Sections 104.8 and 104.8.1 of the California Fire Code are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following: 104.8 Liability. Any liability against Riverside County and City of La Quinta or any officer or employee for damages resulting from the discharge of their duties shall be as provided by law. 4) A new Section 104.13 is added to Section 104 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 104.12 Authority of the Fire Chief to Close Hazardous Fire Areas. Except upon National Forest Land, the Fire Chief is authorized to determine and announce the closure of any hazardous fire area or portion thereof. Any closure by the Fire Chief for a period of more than fifteen (15) calendar days must be approved by the Riverside County Board of Supervisors and/or the City Council within fifteen (15) calendar days of the Fire Chief's original order 32 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 14 of 43 of closure. Upon such closure, no person shall go in or be upon any hazardous fire area, except upon the public roadways and inhabited areas. During such closure, the Fire Chief shall erect and maintain at all entrances to the closed area sufficient signs giving notice of closure. This section shall not prohibit residents or owners of private property within any closed area, or their invitees, from going in or being upon their lands. This section shall not apply to any entry, in the course of duty, by a peace officer, duly authorized public officer or fire department personnel. For the purpose of this section, "hazardous fire area" shall mean public or private land that is covered with grass, grain, brush or forest and situated in a location that makes suppression difficult resulting in great damage. Such areas are designated on Hazardous Fire Area maps filed with the office of the Fire Chief. D. Fees. 1) Section 108.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 108.2 Schedule of Permit Fees. Fees for services and permits shall be as set forth in the City of La Quinta Fee Schedule. 2) Section 108.4 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 108.4 Work Commencing Before Permit Issuance. A person who commences any work, activity or operation regulated by this code before obtaining the necessary permits shall be subject to a double (200%) permit fee, without provisions for refund, at the rate established for the specific permit type in the adopted fee schedule. 3) A new Section 108.7 is added to Section 108 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 108.7 Cost Recovery. Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code sections 11374.5(b)(1 ), 13009 et seq., 25259.4, 25515(a), 25540(a), 25541 (a), California Government Code sections 53150 et seq, and all other provisions of law, all costs incurred by the Riverside County Fire Department for the inspection and enforcement of any provision of these Codes, the investigation of any fire, explosion or other hazardous condition, the suppression of fire, the response to a traffic collision or accident, the containment and/or mitigation of a hazardous materials release, and any rescue or rendering of medical or physical aid or assistance, may be charged to any responsible party, any person who violates these Codes or any person who, due to a negligent or unlawful act or omission, is responsible for or requires or causes the emergency response of Riverside County Fire Department. Any expense incurred by the Riverside County Fire Department for such an emergency response shall constitute a debt of such person and shall be collectible by the County and City of La Quinta in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under contract, express or implied. These provisions shall be applied uniformly against all such persons in violation of a Penal Code, Vehicle Code, Health and Safety Code or other state law statutory violation; only a county or city official (as applicable) shall have authority to reduce or cancel the debt obligation arising from the incident. 33 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 15 of 43 E. Means of Appeals. 1) Section 112.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 112.1 Board of Appeals Established. The Board of Appeals shall be the City of La Quinta Construction Board of Appeals as designated in La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 2.40. The Fire Chief shall be notified of any appeal and the Fire Chief or designee shall be in attendance at the appeal hearing. Depending on the subject of the appeal, specialized expertise may be solicited, at the expense of the applicant, for the purpose of providing input to the Construction Board of Appeals. The Fire Chief and Chief Deputy shall be notified of any appeal and the Fire Chief, Chief Deputy or their designee(s) shall be in attendance at the appeal hearing. Depending on the subject of the appeal, specialized expertise may be solicited, at the expense of the applicant, for the purpose of providing input to the Appeals Board. F. Violations. 1) Section 113.4 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 113.4 Violations and Penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or association of persons to violate any provision of this ordinance, or to violate the provisions of any permit granted pursuant to this code or ordinance. Punishments and penalties for violations shall be in accordance with the City of La Quinta ordinances, fee schedule and California Health and Safety Code Sections 17995 through 17995.5. G. Definitions. 1) Section 202, definition of "Fire Chief' in the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: FIRE CHIEF. The Fire Chief of Riverside County or the Fire Chief's designee. H. Open Flames. 1) Section 308.1.7 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 308.1.7 Sky Lanterns or Similar Devices. A person shall not release or cause to be released a sky lantern or similar device. Fire Apparatus Access Roads. 1) A new Section 503.1.2.1 is added to Section 503.1.2 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 503.1.2.1 Remoteness. Unless otherwise approved, where two fire apparatus access roads are required, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one-half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the property or area to be served, measured in a straight line between accesses. 2) Section 503.2.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 34 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 16 of 43 503.2.1 Dimensions. Fire apparatus access roads shall have an unobstructed width of not less than 24 feet (7,315 mm), exclusive of shoulders, except for approved security gates in accordance with Section 503.6, and an unobstructed vertical clearance of not less than 13 feet 6 inches (4,115 mm). For additional requirements or alternatives see Riverside County Fire Department Standards and Policies, as may be amended from time to time. 3) Section 503.2.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 503.2.2 Authority. The fire code official shall be the only authority authorized to designate fire apparatus access roads and fire lanes and to modify the minimum fire lane access widths for fire or rescue operations. 4) A new Section 503.6.1 is added to Section 503.6 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 503.6.1 Automatic Opener. New motorized gates shall be provided with means to be automatically opened remotely by emergency vehicle in accordance with Riverside County Fire Department standards and Policies, as may be amended from time to time. Exception: Gates serving individual one- and two-family dwelling parcels. 5) A new Section 503.7 is added to Section 503 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 503.7 Loading Areas and Passenger Drop -Off Areas. On private properties, where fire apparatus access roads are utilized for loading or unloading or utilized for passenger drop-off or pick-up, an additional eight (8) feet of width shall be added to the minimum required width for the fire apparatus access road. J. Fire Protection Water Supplies. 1) A new Section 507.5.7 is added to Section 507 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 507.5.7 Fire Hydrant Size and Outlets. As determined by the fire code official, fire hydrant sizes and outlets shall be based on the following: 1. Residential Standard — one (1) four (4) inch outlet and one (1) two and one- half (2 '/2) inch outlet. 2. Super Hydrant Standard — one (1) four (4) inch outlet and two (2) two and one-half (2 '/2) inch outlet. 3. Super Hydrant Enhanced — two (2) four (4) inch outlet and one (1) two and one-half (2 '/2) inch outlet. 2) A new Section 507.5.8 is added to Section 507 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 507.5.8 Fire Hydrant Street Marker. Fire hydrant locations shall be visually indicated in accordance with Riverside County Fire Department Guidelines, as may be amended from time to time. Any hydrant marker damaged or removed during the course of street construction or repair shall be immediately replaced by the contractor, developer or person responsible for removal or damage. 35 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 17 of 43 K. Fire Command Center. 1) Section 508.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 508.1 General. Where required by other sections of this code and in all buildings classified as high-rise buildings by the California Building Code, in buildings greater than 300,000 square feet in area and in Group 1-2 occupancies having occupied floors located more than 75 feet above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access, a fire command center for fire department operations shall be provided and comply with Sections 508.1.1 through 508.1.8. 2) Section 508.1.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 508.1.1 Location and Access. The fire command center shall be located adjacent to the main lobby and shall be accessible from fire department vehicular access or as approved by the fire code official. The room shall have direct access from the building exterior at the lowest level of fire department access. 3) Section 508.1.3 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 508.1.3 Size. The fire command center shall be not less than 0.015 percent of the total building area of the facility served or 200 square feet (19 m2) in area, whichever is greater. The room shall have a minimum dimension of 0.7 times the square root of the room area or 10 feet (3048 mm), whichever is greater. Where a fire command center is solely required because a building is greater than 300,000 square feet (27 870 m2), the fire command center shall have a minimum size of 96 square feet (9 m2) with a minimum dimension of 8 feet (2438 mm) where approved by the fire code official. L. Fire Protection and Utility Equipment Identification and Location. 1) A new Section 509.2.1 is added to section 509.2 of the California Fire Code is added to read as follows: 509.2.1 Minimum Clearances. A 3-foot (914 mm) clear space shall be maintained around the circumference of exterior fire protection system control valves, or any other exterior fire protection system component that may require immediate access, except as otherwise required or approved. M. Mechanical Refrigeration. 1) Section 608.11.1.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 608.11.1.2 Manual Operation. When required by the fire code official, automatic crossover valves shall be capable of manual operation. The manual valves shall be located in an approved location immediately outside of the machinery room in a secure metal box or equivalent and marked as Emergency Controls. N. Automatic Sprinkler Systems. 1) Section 903.2 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 36 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 18 of 43 903.2 Where Required. 1. In all new buildings and structures which are 3,600 square feet or greater, an approved automatic sprinkler system shall be provided regardless of occupancy classification. Where the Sections 903.2.1 — 903.2.21 of the California Fire Code require more restrictive requirements than those listed below, the more restrictive requirement shall take precedence. 2. All existing buildings, except for one- and two-family dwellings, shall be retrofitted with automatic fire sprinklers when a structure exceeds 3,600 square feet and changes are made to the building including any of the following: change of use/occupancy, removal of an existing fire wall as defined by the California Building Code, or additions of 50% or more are made to the original building area and the resulting square footage exceeds 5,000 square feet. 3. One- and two-family dwellings shall have an automatic fire sprinkler system regardless of square footage in accordance with the California Residential Code. Fire sprinkler systems shall be installed in mobile homes, manufactured homes and multifamily manufactured homes with two dwelling units in accordance with Title 25 of the California Code of Regulations. Exception: Unless required elsewhere in this code or the California Building Code, automatic fire sprinkler systems shall not be required for the following: 1. Spaces or areas in telecommunications buildings used exclusively for telecommunications equipment, associated electrical power distribution equipment, batteries not required to have an automatic sprinkler system by Section 1207 for energy storage systems and standby engines, provided that those spaces or areas are equipped throughout with an automatic smoke detection system in accordance with Section 907.2 and are separated from the remainder of the building by not less than 1-hour fire barriers constructed in accordance with Section 707 of the California Building Code or not less than 2-hour horizontal assemblies constructed in accordance with Section 711 of the California Building Code, or both. 2. Detached Group U occupancies used for agricultural purposes. 3. Detached non-combustible equestrian arena shade canopies that are open on all sides and used for riding only - no commercial, assembly or storage uses. 4. Non-combustible fueling station canopies not exceeding 10,000 square feet when separated from other buildings by a distance of not less than 50 feet. 5. Detached fabric or non-combustible shade structures that are open on all sides and used to shade playground equipment, temporary storage of vehicles and dining areas with no cooking. 6. Where determined by the Fire Chief that no major life safety hazard exists, and the fuel load does not pose a significant threat to firefighter safety or to other structures or property, automatic fire sprinklers may be exempted. The following exceptions in the California Fire Code shall not be allowed: 1.1. Exceptions in Section 903.2.3. 37 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 19 of 43 1.2. Exception 2 in Section 903.2.11.3. 2) A new Section 903.3.5.3 is added to Section 903 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 903.3.5.3 Hydraulically Calculated Systems. The design of hydraulically calculated fire sprinkler systems shall not exceed 90% of the water supply capacity. 1) A new Section 904.2.2.1 is added to Section 904.2.2 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 904.2.2.1 Activation of the Fire Alarm System. Where a fire alarm signaling system, or a Dedicated Function Fire Alarm System is serving the occupancy where the extinguishing system is located, the actuation of the automatic fire - extinguishing system shall actuate the fire alarm signaling system in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 72. If afire alarm signaling system, or a Dedicated Function Fire Alarm System is not present, one will be required to be installed to provide monitoring for the automatic fire - extinguishing system. P. HIGH -PILED STORAGE - GENERAL FIRE PROTECTION AND LIFE SAFETY FEATURES 1) A new Section 3206.4.2 is added to Section 3206.4 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 3206.4.2 Minimum Requirements for Client Leased or Occupant Owned Warehouses. Designs of an automatic sprinkler system for client leased or occupant owned buildings containing high pile storage shall be based on the requirements of NFPA 13. Unless otherwise approved, a Professional Engineer, Licensed in the State of California, shall perform a survey of the building to determine commodity classification, storage configuration, building height and other information related to the development of an appropriate sprinkler system design. The fire protection engineer shall also make reasonable efforts to meet with the building owner or operator to understand seasonal or customer related fluctuations to the stored commodities, storage height, and configuration. The sprinkler design shall be based on the most demanding requirements determined through the onsite survey and discussions with the building owner or operator. The technical report shall describe the basis for determining the commodity and sprinkler design selection, how the commodities will be isolated or separated, and include references to the design document(s). If a specific fire test is used as the basis of design, a copy of the fire test report shall be provided at the time of plan review. Q. MOBILE FOOD PREPARATION VEHICLES. 1) A new Section 4107 is added to Chapter 41 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 4107 MOBILE FOOD PREPARATION VEHICLES. W Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 20 of 43 2) New Sections 4107.1 through 4107.2.3 are added to Section 4107 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 4107.1 General. Mobile food preparation vehicles that are equipped with appliances that produce smoke or grease -laden vapors shall comply with this section. 4107.2 Maintenance. Maintenance of systems on mobile food preparation vehicles shall be in accordance with Sections 4107.2.1 through 4107.2.3. 4107.2.1 Exhaust system. The exhaust system, including hood, grease -removal devices, fans, ducts and other appurtenances, shall be inspected and cleaned in accordance with Section 606.3. 4107.2.2 Fire protection systems and devices. Fire protection systems and devices shall be maintained in accordance with Section 901.6. 4107.2.3 Fuel gas systems. LP -gas containers installed on the vehicle and fuel -gas piping systems shall be inspected annually by an approved inspection agency or a company that is registered with the U.S. Department of Transportation to requalify LP -gas cylinders, to ensure that system components are free from damage, suitable for the intended service and not subject to leaking. CNG containers shall be inspected every 3 years in a qualified service facility. CNG containers shall not be used past their expiration date as listed on the manufacturer's container label. Upon satisfactory inspection, the approved inspection agency shall affix a tag on the fuel gas system or within the vehicle indicating the name of the inspection agency and the date of satisfactory inspection. R. FIREWORKS DISPLAY. 1) Section 5608.1.2 is added to Section 5608 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 5608.1.2 Application for Permit. State Fire Marshal Licensed Operators shall make application for Outdoor Public Fireworks Display to the City of La Quinta at least 21 days prior to the proposed event so as to provide adequate time for the City to make reasonable arrangements for community notification of the tentative event and impacts thereof. 2) A new Section 5608.2 is added to Section 5608 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: 5608.2 Fallout Area. For aerial shells, the minimum required radius of the fallout area shall be 100 Win. (22 m/25 mm) of the internal mortar diameter of the largest aerial shell to be fired, unless otherwise approved. S. Appendix B. 1) A new Section 13103.2.1 is added to Section 13103.2 of the California Fire Code to read as follows: B103.2.1 Wildland-Urban Interface Area Subdivisions. The minimum fire flow for any new subdivision or tract constructed within a Wildland-Urban Interface Area shall be 1,500 gallons per minute. 2) Table B105.2 of the California Fire Code is amended as follows: 39 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 21 of 43 TABLE B105.2 REQUIRED FIRE -FLOW FOR BUILDINGS OTHER THAN ONE- AND TWO-FAMILY DWELLINGS. GROUP R-3 AND R-4 BUILDINGS AND TOWNHOUSES AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER MINIMUM FIRE -FLOW FLOW DURATION SYSTEM (gallons per minute) (hours) (Design Standard No automatic sprinkler Value in Table B105.1(2) Duration in Table system B105.1(2) Section 903.3.1.1 of the 50% of the value in Table Duration in Table California Fire Code B105.1(2)a B105.1(2) at the reduced flow rate Section 903.3.1.2 of the 50% of the value in Table Duration in Table California Fire Code B105.1(2)b B105.1(2) at the reduced flow rate For SI: 1 gallon per minute = 3.785 L/m. a The reduced fire -flow shall be not less than 1,000 gallons per minute. b The reduced fire -flow shall be not less than 1,500 gallons per minute. T. Appendix C. 1) Section C103.1 of the California Fire Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: C103.1 Hydrant Spacing. Fire apparatus access roads and public streets providing required access to buildings in accordance with Section 503 of the International Fire Code shall be provided with one or more fire hydrants, as determined by Section C102.1. Where more than one fire hydrant is required, the distance between required fire hydrants shall be in accordance with Sections C103.2 and C103.3. Fire hydrants shall be provided at street intersections. 18. Section 8.14.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Energy Code" shall be amended to read as follows: Certain documents marked and designated as the "2025 California Energy Code," published by the California Building Standards Commission, are adopted to make businesses, homes, and appliances more energy efficient through the development and implementation of energy efficiency building practices. Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. 19. Section 8.14.020, entitled "Amendments to the California Energy Code" shall be added and read as follows: Section 8.14.020 — Amendments to the California Energy Code. 40 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 22 of 43 Section 110.4(c) of the 2025 California Energy Code is amended to read as follows: (c) Heating source sizing. Heating systems or equipment for pools and/or spas shall meet one of the sizing requirements 1 through 5 below: 1. A solar pool heating system with a solar collector surface area that is equivalent to the following: A. For nonresidential and multifamily buildings, 65 percent or greater of the pool and/or spa surface area. B. For single-family buildings, 60 percent or greater of the pool and/or spa surface area. 2. A heat pump pool heater as the primary heating system that meets the sizing requirements of Reference Joint Appendix JA16.3. The supplementary heater can be of any energy source; or 3. A heating system that derives at least 60 percent of the annual heating energy from on -site renewable energy or on -site recovered energy. 4. A combination of a solar pool heating system and heat pump pool heater without any additional supplementary heater; or 5. A pool heating system determined by the Executive Director to use no more energy than the systems specified in Items 1, 2, 3, or 4 above. Exception 1 to Section 110.4(c): Portable electric spas compliant with 20 CCR §1605.3(g)(7) of the Appliance Efficiency Regulations. Exception 2 to Section 110.4(c): Alterations to existing pools and/or spas with existing heating systems or equipment. Exception 3 to Section 110.4(c): A pool and/or spa that is heated solely by a solar pool heating system without any backup heater. Exception 4 to Section 110.4(c): Heating systems that are used exclusively for permanent spa applications in existing buildings with gas availability. Exception 5 to Section 110.4(c): Heating systems that are used exclusively for permanent spa applications where there is an inadequate Solar Access Roof Area (SARA) as specified in Section 150.1(c)14 for a solar pool heating system to be installed. Exception 6 to Section 110.4(c): Gas -fueled heating equipment compliant with federal appliance efficiency standards in areas with existing gas availability. 20. Section 8.15.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Historical Code" shall be amended to read as follows: Certain documents marked and designated as the "2025 California Historical Building Code," published by the California Building Standards Commission, are adopted to facilitate the preservation and continuing use of qualified historical buildings or properties while providing reasonable safety for the building occupants and access for persons with disabilities 41 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 23 of 43 Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. 21. Section 8.16.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Existing Building Code" shall be amended to read as follows: Certain documents marked and designated as the "2025 California Existing Building Code," published by the California Building Standards Commission, are adopted to promote public safety and welfare by reducing the risk or injury that may result from the effects of earthquakes on existing unreinforced masonry bearing wall buildings Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. 22. Section 8.17.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Referenced Standards Code" shall be amended to read as follows: Certain documents marked and designated as the "2025 California Referenced Standards Code," published by the California Building Standards Commission, are hereby adopted Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. 23. Chapter 8.18, entitled "Wildland Urban Interface Code", Section 8.18.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code" and Section 8.18.020, entitled "Amendments and Additions to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code" shall be added and read as follows: Section 8.18.010 - Adoption of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code Certain documents marked and designated as the "2025 California Wildland-Urban Interface Code", including both provisions adopted by the State Fire Marshal (as indicated by a "X") and provisions not adopted by the State Fire Marshal (as indicated by a "t") as set forth in the matrix of each chapter, and specifically Chapter 1, Division 11 (except that Sections 103.2 and 112.3 are not adopted), and only sections A101 through A102.2, A102.4, A104, A105.1, A105.4 through A105.4.2, A106 through A106.2 and A107 through A107.5 of Appendix A, published by the California Building Standards Commission are adopted to mitigate the risk to life and structures from intrusion of fire from wild land fire exposures and fire exposures from adjacent structures and to mitigate structure fires from spreading to wildland fuels. 42 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 24 of 43 Each and all of the regulations, provisions, conditions and terms therein, on file with the building official, are referenced and made a part hereof as if fully set out in this chapter, except as otherwise provided in this chapter. Section 8.18.020 - Amendments and Additions to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code A. APPLICABILITY, 1) A new Section 102.4.1.1 is added to Section 102.4.1 of the California Wildland- Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 102.4.1.1 Application of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code. Where a conflict exists between the provisions of the California Fire Code and the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code, the more restrictive provisions shall apply. B. DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE CODE OFFICIAL. 1) A new Section 104.1.1 is added to Section 104.1 of the California Wildland- Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 104.1.1 Authority of the Fire Chief, Chief Deputy, and Fire Department. 1. The Fire Chief, Chief Deputy, or their designee is authorized and directed to enforce all applicable State fire laws and provisions of this code and to perform such duties as directed by the La Quinta City Council. 2. The Fire Chief, Chief Deputy, or their designee is authorized to administer, interpret and enforce this code. Under the Fire Chief, Chief Deputy, or their designee's direction, the Riverside County Fire Department is authorized to enforce City of La Quinta ordinances pertaining to the following: 2.1. The prevention of fires. 2.2. The suppression or extinguishment of dangerous or hazardous fires. 2.3. The storage, use and handling of hazardous materials. 2A. The installation and maintenance of automatic, manual and other private fire alarm systems and fire extinguishing equipment. 2.5. The maintenance and regulation of fire escapes. 2.6. The maintenance of fire protection and the elimination of fire hazards on land, in buildings, structures and other property, including those under construction. 2.7. The maintenance of means of egress. 43 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 25 of 43 2.8. The investigation of the cause, origin and circumstances of fire and unauthorized releases of hazardous materials. 3. The following persons are hereby authorized to interpret and enforce the provisions of this code and to make arrests and issue citations as authorized by law: 3.1. The Unit Chief, Peace Officers and Public Officers of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. 3.2. The Fire Chief, Peace Officers and Public Officers of the Riverside County Fire Department. 3.3. The Riverside County Sheriff and any deputy sheriff. 3.4. The Police Chief and any police officer of any city served by the Riverside County Fire Department. 3.5.Officers of the California Highway Patrol. 3.6. Code Compliance Officers of the City of La Quinta. 3.7. Peace Officers of the California Department of Parks and Recreation. 3.8. The law enforcement officer of the Federal Bureau of Land Management. 2) Section 104.2 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is deleted and replaced with the following: 104.2 Determination of compliance. The fire code official shall have the authority to determine compliance with this code, to render interpretations of this code and to develop policies, procedures, guidelines, standards, and information bulletins in order to clarify the application of its provisions. Such interpretations, policies, procedures: 1. Shall be in compliance with the intent and purpose of this code. 2. Shall not have the effect of waiving requirements specifically provided for in this code. 3. Shall be enforceable as part of this code. 3) Sections 104.8 and 104.8.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code are deleted in their entirety and replaced with the following: 104.8 Liability. Any liability against Riverside County and City of La Quinta or any officer or employee for damages resulting from the discharge of their duties shall be as provided by law. 44 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 26 of 43 C. PERMITS. 1) Section 105.2 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is deleted in it's entirety and replaced with the following: 105.2 Permits Required. Unless otherwise exempted, buildings or structures regulated by this code shall not be erected, constructed, altered, repaired, moved, removed, converted, demolished or changed in use or occupancy unless a separate permit for each building or structure has first been obtained from the code official. For buildings or structures erected for temporary uses, see Section A108.3. Where required by the code official, a permit shall be obtained for the following activities, operations, practices or functions within a wildland-urban interface area- l. Automobile wrecking yard. 2. Candles and open flames in assembly areas. 3. Explosives or blasting agents. 4. Fireworks. 5. Flammable or combustible liquids. 6. Hazardous materials. 7. Liquefied petroleum gases. 8. Landscape and fuel modification zones. 9. Lumberyards. 10. Motor vehicle fuel -dispensing stations. 11.Open burning. 12. Pallet Yards. 13. Pyrotechnical special effects material. 14.Tents, canopies and temporary membrane structures. 15. Tire storage. 16. Welding and cutting operations. D. FEES. 1) Section 108.2 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 108.2 Schedule of permit fees. Fees for services and permits shall be as set forth by fee resolution of the City Council. 45 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 27 of 43 2) A new Section 108.7 is added to Section 108 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 108.7 Cost recovery. Pursuant to California Health and Safety Code sections 11374.5(b)(1), 13009 et seq., 25259.4, 25515(a), 25540(a), 25541(a), California Government Code sections 53150 et seq, and all other provisions of law, all costs incurred by the Riverside County Fire Department for the inspection and enforcement of any provision of these Codes, the investigation of any fire, explosion or other hazardous condition, the suppression of fire, the response to a traffic collision or accident, the containment and/or mitigation of a hazardous materials release, and any rescue or rendering of medical or physical aid or assistance, may be charged to any responsible party, any person who violates these Codes or any person who, due to a negligent or unlawful act or omission, is responsible for or requires or causes the emergency response of Riverside County Fire Department. Any expense incurred by the Riverside County Fire Department for such an emergency response shall constitute a debt of such person and shall be collectible by the County and City of La Quinta in the same manner as in the case of an obligation under contract, express or implied. These provisions shall be applied uniformly against all such persons in violation of a Penal Code, Vehicle Code, Health and Safety Code or other state law statutory violation; only a county and/or city official shall have authority to reduce or cancel the debt obligation arising from the incident. E. INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT 1) Section 109.3.7 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: 109.3.7 Violation and penalties. It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, corporation or association of persons to violate any provision of this code, or to violate the provisions of any permit granted pursuant to this code. Punishments and penalties for violations shall be in accordance with California Health and Safety Code Sections 17995 through 17995.5 and Government Code Section 51185. F. DEFINITIONS. 46 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 28 of 43 1) Section 202, definition of "Fire Chief" in the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following: FIRE CHIEF. The Fire Chief of Riverside County or the Fire Chief's designee. G. WILDLAND-URBAN INTERFACE AREA DESIGNATIONS. 1) Section 302.1.1 is added to Section 302.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 302.1.1 Designation of Fire Hazard Severity Zones. The La City Council has adopted the recommendations of the State Fire Marshal made pursuant to Government Code section 51178 and designated those areas within the City as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones as shown on the Local Responsibility Area Fire Hazard Severity Zones Maps published by the Office of the State Fire Marshal. H. SPECIAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTION REGULATIONS. 1) Section 501.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface shall be amended as follows.. 501.1 Scope. Buildings and structures in a wildland-urban interface area shall be constructed in accordance with the California Building Code and this code. For the purpose of this Chapter, a wildland-urban interface area shall be defined as a geographical area identified by the state as a "Fire Hazard Severity Zone" in accordance with the Public Resources Code Sections 4201 through 4204 and Government Code Sections 51175 through 51189, and other areas designated by the enforcing agency to be at a significant risk from wildfires, and shall include those areas designated as moderate, high, and very high fire hazard severity zones based on recommendations from the State Fire Marshal pursuant to Government Code Section 51178. Exceptions: 1. Group U accessory structures not exceeding 120 square feet (11 m2) in floor area where located not less than 50 feet (15 240 mm) from applicable buildings. 2. Group U agricultural buildings not less than 50 feet (15 240 mm) from applicable buildings. I. FIRE PROTECTION PLANS. 47 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 29 of 43 1) Section 602.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended as follows.. 602.1 General. A fire protection plan shall be submitted to the Fire Code Official for any proposed subdivision of land or building project. The fire protection plan shall be prepared to determine the acceptability of fire protection and life safety measures designed to mitigate wildfire hazards presented for the property under consideration. The fire protection plan shall be prepared by a registered design professional, qualified landscape architect, qualified fire safety specialist or similar specialist acceptable to the code official and shall analyze the wildfire risk of the building, project, premises or region to recommend necessary changes. Submittal of a preliminary fire protection plan shall be required prior to the submission of a final fire protection plan. Exception: A single-family dwelling (Group R-3 Occupancy) when located on an existing legal parcel. 2) Section 602.3.2 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended as follows: 602.3.2 Final Fire Protection Plan. Final fire protection plan shall include items listed in Section 602.3.1 and the following: 1. A map identifying all proposed plants in the fuel modification zones with a legend that includes a symbol for each proposed plant species. The plan shall include specific information on each species proposed, including but not limited to: 1.1. The plant life -form; 1.2. The scientific and common name; and 1.3. The expected height and width for mature growth. 2. Identification of irrigated and non -irrigated zones. 3. Requirements for vegetation reduction around emergency access and evacuation routes. 4. Identification of existing vegetation proposed to remain. 5. Identification of points of access for equipment and personnel to maintain vegetation in common areas. Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 30 of 43 6. Methods and timetables for controlling, changing, or modifying areas on the property. 7. Legally binding statements regarding community responsibility for maintenance of fuel modification zones. 8. Legally binding statements to be included in covenants, conditions and restrictions regarding property owner responsibilities for vegetation maintenance. J. VEGETATION PLAN. 1) Section 603.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended as follows.. 603.1 General. Planting of vegetation for new and replacement landscaping shall be selected to reduce vegetation in proximity to a structure and to maintain vegetation as it matures. 2) Section 603.3 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended as follows.. 603.3 Landscape and Fuel Modification plans. Landscape and Fuel Modification plans shall be submitted for any project located in a WUI area. The landscape and Fuel Modification plan shall include development and maintenance requirements for the vegetation management zone adjacent to structures and roadways, and to provide significant fire hazard reduction benefits for public and firefighting safety. 3) Section 603.3.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended as follows: 603.3.1 Contents. Landscape plans shall contain the following- 1 - Delineation of the 5-foot (1524 mm) (Zone 0), 30-foot (9144 mm) (Zone 1) and 100-foot (30 480 mm) (Zone 2) fuel management zones from all structures. 2. Identification of existing vegetation to remain and proposed new vegetation. 3. Identification of irrigated areas. 4. A plant legend with both botanical and common names, and identification of all plant material symbols. 5. Identification of ground coverings within the 30-foot (9144 mm) zone. K. MAINTENANCE OF DEFENSIBLE SPACE. 49 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 31 of 43 1) Section 604.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended as follows.. 604.1 General. Vegetation and fuels shall be managed to reduce the severity of potential exterior wildfire exposure to buildings and to reduce the risk of fire spreading to buildings as required by applicable laws and regulations. 2) Section 604.3 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended as follows.. 604.3 Requirements. Vegetation and fuels around all buildings and structures shall be maintained in accordance with the following laws and regulations: 1. Public Resources Code, Section 4291. 2. California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Division 1.5, Chapter 7, Subchapter 3, Article 3, Section 1299.03. 3. California Government Code, Section 51182. 4. California Code of Regulations, Title 19, Division 1, Chapter 1, Subchapter 1, Article 3, Section 3.07. 5. The requirements of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code and Riverside County Fire Department Guidelines. 3) Section 604.3.1 is added to Section 604.3 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.3.1 Retroactivity. When required by the Fire Code Official, or State Law, existing Defensible Space/Fuel Modification Zones (FMZ) shall require retrofitting, including thinning and/or removal of plants, trees, and vegetation, to meet this code or State Law. Upon notification by the Fire Code Official, and when approved, work to bring an existing Defensible Space and FMZ into compliance with this code, may be done over a two to four (2-4) year period as determined by the Fire Code Official. A compliance plan prepared by the property owner may be requested for review and approval by the Fire Code Official. 4) Section 604.6 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.6 Clearance of brush, vegetative growth, and combustible material from improved parcels. All improved parcels declared a Public Nuisance 50 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 32 of 43 shall be cleared entirely of combustible material. If the Fire Code Official determines this impractical, the provisions of Section 604.7 may be used. 5) Section 604.7 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.7 Clearance of fuels or vegetative growth from structures. Clearance of fuels and vegetative growth from structures shall be per sections 604.7.1 through 604.7.4 of this code. 6) Section 604.7.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.7.1 Structures. Any person owning, leasing, controlling, operating, or maintaining any building or structure in, upon, or adjoining any FHSZ, governed by this section, and any person owning, leasing, or controlling any land adjacent to such buildings, shall at all times maintain around and adjacent to such building, an effective firebreak made by removing and clearing away, all combustible material on their property for a distance not less than 100 feet from all portions of the building. Distances may be increased by the Fire Code Official due to a site -specific analysis based on local conditions and when required, based on a Fire Protection Plan. This section shall not apply to single specimens or stands of protected species of trees, Ornamental Landscape or similar plants used in landscaping and ground covers, that are well -pruned, maintained, and spaced, and do not form a means of rapidly transmitting fire from other nearby vegetation to a structure or from a structure to other nearby vegetation or to interrupt the advance of embers toward a structure. 7) Section 604.7.2 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.7.2 Timing for new buildings and additions to existing buildings. The provisions of Section 604.7 shall be completed prior to vertical construction of any New Building or addition to an Existing Building. 8) Section 604.7.3 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 51 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 33 of 43 604.7.3 Photovoltaic Systems. The clearance requirements around freestanding photovoltaic systems and equipment shall comply with the following: 1. A minimum 10-foot clearance for clusters of panels not exceeding 1,500 square feet of combined panel area. 2. A minimum of 30-foot clearance for clusters of panels greater than 1,500 square feet of combined panel area. 3. Clusters shall be separated by a minimum of 20 feet. 4. Panels and clusters shall be not located within 30 feet of any Building subject to clearance requirements of Section 604 unless the clearance requirements of Section 604 are provided as measured from the perimeter of the panel or cluster. 9) Section 604.8 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8 Defensible Space clearance zones and requirements. The required 100-foot Defensible Space clearance is identified in three (3) distinct zones: Zone 0, 1, and 2. 10) Section 604.8.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.1 Requirements. Defensible Space shall be in accordance with the requirements of Appendix A of this code, Riverside County Fire Department Guidelines and the specific requirements for each zone listed in Sections 604.8.2 through 604.8.5. 11) Section 604.8.2 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.2 Zone 0 purpose and location. Zone 0 reduces the likelihood of structure ignition by reducing the potential for direct ignition of the structure from flame contact, by embers that accumulate at the base of a wall, and/or indirect ignitions when embers ignite vegetation, vegetative debris, or other combustible materials located close to the structure that result in either a radiant heat and/or a direct flame contact exposure to the structure. Zone 0 is the horizontal area within the first five (5) feet around the structure, including stairs, balconies, attached or adjacent decks, and outbuildings. 52 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 34 of 43 Zone 0 is measured from the edge of a structure, attached or adjacent decks, patio covers, balconies, and floor projections above -grade. Zone 0 also includes the area on the roof of a building, and underneath and on top of attached decks, patio covers, balconies, and stair landings. Advisory Notice: Riverside County Fire Department has local Zone 0 requirements currently in effect for new Buildings and additions to existing Buildings. New State regulations for Zone 0 are currently under development by the State Board of Forestry and Fire Protection. Any State regulation more restrictive than this code shall apply. This may require thinning and/or removal of plants, trees, and vegetation to meet State Law and regulations. 12) Section 604.8.2.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.2.1 Non -Combustible Zone 0 for New Buildings, additions to Existing Buildings, and new or replacement landscape. Fuels, including Combustible Materials and vegetation, are prohibited in Zone 0 for all New Buildings, additions to Existing Buildings, installation of new landscape, and refurbishment of existing landscape areas. The application date of Section 604.8.2.1 shall be the later application date when any of the following occur- 1 . Fire Department Clearance for a New Building or addition to an Existing Building. 2. Building permit for a New Building or addition to an Existing Building. 3. Landscape plans submitted for Riverside County Fire Department review. 4. Replacement of landscape when landscape plans are not required. 13) Section 604.8.2.2 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.2.2 Additional requirements in Zone 0. 1. New and existing tree canopies are prohibited within 10 feet of New Buildings, including the addition portion to Existing Buildings. Exception: Existing protected oak trees shall be trimmed to provide a minimum 5-foot clearance above the roof and 5 feet to the side of any New Building, or the addition portion to an Existing Building. 53 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 35 of 43 2. Landscaped roofs are prohibited. 3. Vegetation underneath decks is prohibited. 4. Other Combustible Materials underneath any deck, not part of the deck structure itself, shall be removed. 5. Artificial or synthetic grass is prohibited within Zone 0. 6. Vines and climbing plants are not allowed on structures, including decks, patio/shade structures, and any fences within 5 feet of a Building. 7. Combustible mulch and wood chips are prohibited. 8. Firewood is prohibited. 9. All fencing and gates shall be non-combustible. See Section 604.11. 14) Section 604.8.2.3 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.2.3 Zone 0 requirements for Existing Buildings. 15) Section 604.8.2.3.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.2.3.1 Zone 0 restrictions. The following requirements apply within Zone 0 for all Existing Buildings with landscape installed prior to January 1, 2026: 1. No combustible landscape mulch or wood chips. 2. No firewood. 3. No vegetation underneath decks. 4. Other Combustible Materials underneath any deck, not part of the deck structure itself, shall be removed. 5. Roofs and gutters on Buildings shall be maintained free of any leaves, needles, or other vegetative Combustible Materials. 6. The vertical clearance distance for trees and vegetation above any roof shall be not less than 3 feet. 7. A minimum 3-foot clearance of trees and vegetation shall be provided to the side and above any eave or roof projection from the exterior wall of a Building. A minimum 3-foot clearance of trees and vegetation shall be provided below any eave or roof projection. This requirement also applies to any patio cover or other Building projections. 8. New trees are not allowed. 54 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 36 of 43 9. New or replacement landscaping shall comply with Sections 604.8.1, 604.8.2.1, and 604.8.2.2. 16) Section 604.8.3 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.3 Zone 1 purpose and location. Zone 1 reduces the likelihood of fire burning directly to the structure. This is accomplished by modifying Fuels and creating a discontinuity between planting groups that limits the pathways for fire to burn to the structure and reduces the potential for near -to -building ember generation and radiant heat exposures. An additional purpose of this zone is to provide a defendable area for fire personnel to stage and take direct action. Zone 1 is the area within 5-30 feet of structures and decks, with slopes not greater than 20 percent; 5-50 feet from Buildings and decks, when slopes are greater than 20 percent. 17) Section 604.8.3.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.3.1 Requirements and allowable items. This is a minimal planting zone which includes very limited trees of a fire -smart type with additional spacing provided. Plants and other vegetation shall be in accordance with Appendix A of this code and Riverside County Fire Department Guidelines. 18) Section 604.8.4 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.4 Zone 2 purpose and location. Zone 2 is designed to reduce the potential behavior of an oncoming fire in such a way as to drop an approaching fire from the crown of trees to the ground, reducing the flame heights, and the potential for ember generation and radiant heat exposure to structures. Additional benefits of the Zone 2 include facilitating direct defense actions and improving the function of Zones 0 and 1. Zone 2 is the area from the outer edge of Zone 1 to 100 feet from structures and decks. 19) Section 604.8.4.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 55 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 37 of 43 604.8.4.1 Requirements and allowable items. Plants and other vegetation shall be in accordance with Appendix A of this code and Riverside County Fire Department Guidelines. 20) Section 604.8.4.2 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.4.2 Spacing. Spacing of vegetation and trees at the outer edge of Zone 2 shall be based upon the height of the vegetation within Zone 2 or the adjacent area beyond the 100-foot zone, whichever provides for the greater spacing. This may require clearance outside the 100-foot zone or setting back vegetation and trees within Zone 2 away from the 100-foot line. 21) Section 604.8.5 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.5 General requirements for Zone 0, 1, and 2. 22) Section 604.8.5.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.5.1 Dead and dying vegetation. All dead or dying grass, plants, shrubs, trees, branches, leaves, weeds, and tree needles shall be removed. 23) Section 604.8.5.2 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.5.2 Mulch and wood chips within Zones 1 and 2. Use of combustible Mulch and wood chips shall be in accordance with the requirements Riverside County Fire Department Guidelines. 24) Section 604.8.5.3 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.5.3 Firewood. See Section 607. 25) Section 604.8.5.4 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.5.4 Clearance from chimney, stovepipe. Any portion of a tree or shrub that extends within 10 feet horizontally or vertically of a chimney outlet or stovepipe outlet shall be removed. 26) Section 604.8.5.5 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 56 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 38 of 43 604.8.5.5 Trees. New trees shall be planted and maintained so that the tree's drip line at maturity is a minimum of 10 feet from any combustible structure. 27) Section 604.8.5.5.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.5.5.1 Tree spacing. The horizontal distance between crowns of new trees and crowns of adjacent trees shall not be less than 20 feet in Zone 1 and not less than 10 feet in Zone 2. Separation distance may be increased for slopes exceeding 20 percent. Required spacing is measured between trees at maturity. 28) Section 604.8.5.5.2 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 29) 604.8.5.5.2 Ground clearance of trees. Trees exceeding 6 feet in height shall be limbed up from the ground 6 feet or 1/3 the height of the tree, whichever is less. Exception: Fruit trees when approved by the Fire Code Official. 30) Section 604.8.5.5.3 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.5.5.3 Ground cover under tree canopy. When approved ground cover and shrubs are located underneath trees, the vertical clearance to the lowest branch of the tree canopy shall not be less than three times the height of the ground cover or shrub under or adjacent to the tree. The horizontal clearance shall be 3 feet from the trunk of the tree. 31) Section 604.8.5.6 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.5.6 Continuous tree canopies. 32) Section 604.8.5.6.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.5.6.1 New Structures. Continuous tree canopies are not allowed. Tree spacing shall be in accordance with Riverside County Fire Department Guidelines. 33) Section 604.8.5.6.2 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 57 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 39 of 43 604.8.5.6.2 Existing Structures. Continuous tree canopies may be allowed as determined by the Fire Code Official but will require the complete removal of any understory and smaller trees to meet requirements for a shaded fuel zone. Any remaining trees shall be limbed up a minimum of 12 feet from the ground or 1/3 the tree height, whichever is less. The intent is to not allow a crown (canopy) fire to spread unchecked to a structure and to bring any crown fire down to the ground level prior to Zone 1. 34) Section 604.8.5.7 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.8.5.7 Grasses. Natural or annual grasses shall be mowed to a maximum height of 4-inch stubble with clippings removed. 35) Section 604.9 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.9 Fire protection equipment and utilities. The clearance requirements of Sections 604.7 and 604.8 shall apply to communication site towers and their support Buildings; required fire protection water supplies, including water tanks, water supply pumps, and pump houses; and any other utility Structure as required by the Fire Code Official. The Fire Code Official may consider a reduced distance, not less than 30 feet, for communication site towers, water tanks, and Structures with no interior space, based upon a site risk assessment. Also see Appendix A. 36) Section 604.10 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.10 Planting vegetation under or adjacent to energized electrical lines. No vegetation shall be planted under or adjacent to energized power lines that, at maturity, will grow within 10 feet of the energized conductors. 37) Section 604.11 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.11 Fencing. 38) Section 604.11.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: W., Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 40 of 43 604.11.1 Scope. This section only applies to fences, including gates within the fencing, within 5 feet of Building(s), including Decks, (Zone 0) that are in an applicable Fire Hazard Severity Zone req by Chapter 6 of this code. 39) Section 604.11.2 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.11.2 New fencing. New fencing and gates shall be constructed of a non- combustible material. 40) Section 604.11.3 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 604.11.3 Existing fencing. Fencing installed prior to January 1, 2026, may remain. Exception: The entire fencing not parallel and within 5 feet of the Building, including gates within the fencing, shall be constructed of a non-combustible material when any portion of the existing fencing within 5 feet is being replaced. Fencing beyond 5 feet from the Building is not required to be replaced with non-combustible material. L. STORAGE OF FIREWOOD AND COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. 1) Section 607.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended to read as follows: 607.1 General. Firewood and combustible materials shall not be stored in unenclosed spaces beneath Buildings or Structures, or on Decks or under eaves, canopies, or other projections or overhangs. Firewood piles shall be located 30 feet (9144 mm) or more from structures unless completely covered by a fire-resistant material. Exposed wood piles located within the defensible space shall have a minimum clearance of 10 feet (3048 mm) down to bare mineral soil in all directions. Firewood shall not be stored within Zone 0. 2) Section 607.1.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended to read as follows: 607.1.1 Combustible Materials. Combustible Materials, other than vegetation, stored within Zones 1 and 2 shall not be stored so as to pose a hazard to any Building. Piles shall not exceed 100 square feet of area and a maximum height of 10 feet. Piles shall be separated by a minimum of 20-foot clear area. 59 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 41 of 43 3) Section 607.2 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended to read as follows: 607.2 Storage for off -site use. Firewood and Combustible Materials not for consumption on the premises shall not be stored within Zones 0, 1, and 2. See Appendix A for storage requirements. M. BUILDING SITING AND SETBACKS 1) Section 608.1.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 608.1.1 Restricted development setbacks. New Structures and additions to existing Structures shall not be constructed less than 100 feet from any protected habitat, whether on the same or adjacent Parcels, where the 100-foot Defensible Space required under Section 604.7 cannot be provided, unless an alternate method of construction and protection is provided that can ensure the safety of the Structure and emergency responders as approved by the Fire Code Official. Protected habitat includes lands restricted from brush clearance or modification due to Federal or State listed endangered species. Protected habitat does not include sensitive habitat areas. 2) Section 608.2 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended to read as follows: 608.2 General. All parcels shall provide a minimum 30-foot (9144 mm) setback for all buildings from property lines and the center of a road, except as provided for in Section 608.2.1. [CCR T14 §1276.00(a)] This section applies to new Tract and Parcel maps, new Buildings, and additions to Existing Buildings. 3. Section 608.2.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended to read as follows: 608.2.1 Setback reduction. A reduction in the minimum setback shall be based upon practical reasons, which may include but are not limited to, parcel dimensions or size; topographic limitations; Development density requirements or other Development patterns that promote low -carbon emission outcomes; sensitive habitat or Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 42 of 43 other site constraints, and shall provide for an alternative method to reduce structure -to -structure ignition by incorporating a combination of features such as, but not limited to: 1. Non-combustible block walls or fences; or 2. Non-combustible material extending 5 feet (1524 mm) horizontally from the furthest extent of the building; or 3. Hardscape landscaping; or 4. A reduction of exposed windows on the side of the structure with setback less than 30 feet (9144 mm). [CCR T14 §1276.01] N. RIDGELINES, FUEL BREAKS, AND GREENBELTS. 1. Section 609.2.7.1 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 609.2.7.1 Greenbelts. Subdivisions and other developments, which propose Greenbelts as a part of the development plan, shall locate the Greenbelts strategically, as a separation between wildland fuels and Structures. The locations shall be approved by the inspection authority. 2. Section 609.2.7.2 is added to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code to read as follows: 609.2.7.2 Access to Greenbelts. A minimum of one (1) access point shall be provided to new Greenbelts at an approved location to allow for on -going maintenance and firefighter access. Additional access points shall be provided when required by the Fire Code Official. O. APPENDIX A 1) Section A102.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended to read as follows: A102.1 General. Vegetation control shall comply with Sections A102.2 through A102.4 and with Chapter 6. 2) Section A105.1 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended to read as follows: 61 Ordinance No. 627 Amending Title 8 - 2025 California Building Standards Code Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 43 of 43 A105.1 General. In addition to the requirements of the California Fire Code, California Wildland-Urban Interface Code Chapter 6, and the La Quinta Municipal code - storage and use of the materials shall be in accordance with Sections A105.2 through A105.4.2. 3) Section A105.4 of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code is amended to read as follows: A105.4 Combustible Materials. Outside storage of Combustible Materials such as, but not limited to, wood, rubber tires, building materials, or paper products shall comply with the other applicable sections of this code and this section. Storage of pallets shall be in accordance with California Fire Code, Section 2810. Storage and processing of wood chips, hogged materials, fines, Compost, Compostable Material, Mulch, solid biomass, raw product, and combustible yard waste and recycle material shall be in accordance with California Fire Code, Section 2808. No changes to the remainder of Title 8. .. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE ) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. 627 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the 2nd day of December, 2025, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 16th day of December, 2025, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of La Quinta as specified in the Rules of Procedure adopted by City Council Resolution No. 2022-027. MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on the 17th day of December, 2025, pursuant to Council Resolution 2022-027. MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 63 ATTACHMENT 1 Summary of 2025 California Building Standards Code Updates Items below are a summary of 2025 California Building Standards Code Updates that will take effect on January 1, 2026. Building Code: • Format modernization: The 2025 International Model Codes feature a more user- friendly layout, including single -column text, modernized fonts, and QR codes that link to details on technical changes. • Residential Group R-2 and Group R-3 in relation to non -transient hotels and motels specifying that all non -transient hotels and motels, regardless of number of guest rooms, shall be classified as Occupancy Group R-2. • Updates to egress requirements in high -occupancy spaces, including wider corridors and stairwell lighting. • New requirements for third -party inspections on certain materials and systems. Clearer protocols for reporting, documentation, and engineer -of -record coordination. • Removed Chapter 7A, relocated to Part 7 — California Wildland-Urban Interface Code. Residential Code: • Definitions: Amended multiple definitions to eliminate references to chapters of the International Residential Code (IRC) that are not adopted and not printed in the California Residential Code (CRC). Repealed multiple existing California definitions and adopted new model code definitions that contain the same language. • Section R102.8 Added as a pointer to the new California Wildland-Urban Interface Code. Energy Code: • Updates prescriptive requirements for air -source heat pump water heaters (HPWH); gas only if using performance (requires trade-offs). • Updates prescriptive requirements for space heating to heat pump equipment in all climate zones; gas space heating only if using performance (requires trade- offs). • Removes incandescent lamps and fluorescent lamps from JA8 (no longer allowed for sale in California) • Updates mandatory requirements for ventilation and indoor air quality. • Updates PV sizing and adds additional building types to the mandatory PV and Battery requirements for Nonresidential buildings. • Multifamily buildings get add electric -ready requirements such as receptacle, condensate drain, designated space, and ventilation. Electrical/Mechanical/Plumbing Codes: • GFCI protection is required in Kitchens regardless of whether the outlet serves the countertop. • GFCI applies to receptacles new listed items include Electric ranges, wall mounted ovens, clothes dryers and Microwave ovens. • EV charging system guidelines now include bi-directional power flow and safety interlocks. • New refrigerant safety group classifications based on flammability and toxicity. • New design requirements for geothermal district ambient temperature loop (ATL) systems. New Part 7 — California Wildland-Urban Interface Code: • Uses the Fire Hazard Severity Zones that Council Adopted June 17th, 2025, to require "Very High", "High" and "Moderate" Zones to do the following: [END] o Provide access, water supply, and a fire protection plan. o Use special building construction, including the requirements for location and design of the buildings and structures within the zones. o Follow fire protection requirements, such as but not limited to, defensible space, planted vegetation, location of LP -gas containers, storage of firewood, and location and setback of buildings. 65 ATTACHMENT 2 Summary of the 2025 California Building Standards Code Local Amendments Item numbers below refer to the numbered items as noted in Exhibit "A" of the Ordinance adopting the 2025 California Building Standards Code and amending Title 8 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC). No changes to policy or enforcement from previous triennial code adoption unless otherwise noted. 1. Updates edition of adopted California Administrative Code. 2. Updates edition of adopted California Building Code, including Chapters and Appendices to be adopted without any additional voluntary measures. 3. Readopts previous Code Amendment for wall and fence criteria that is exempt from permit requirements per historic City practices (identified for local amendment filing only). 4. Readopts previous Code Amendment for fire -sprinkler installation per Riverside County Fire Authority (identified for local amendment filing only). 5. Readopts previous Code Amendment for Class A Rated Roof Covering Materials per historic City practices (identified for local amendment filing only) and renaming of section to align with "2025" code language. 6. Updates edition of adopted California Electrical Code only. 7. Readopts previous Code Amendment for Underground wiring per historic City practices (identified for local amendment filing only). 8. Readopts previous Code Amendment for Copper wiring per historic City practices (identified for local amendment filing only). 9. Updates edition of adopted California Plumbing Code only. 10. Adds Section 8.04.020, entitled "Amendments to the California Plumbing Code", to amend the Plumbing Code to permit the use of an occupant load table commonly referenced by design professional that is not applicable to non-DSA / OSPHD related occupancies. 11. Updates edition of adopted California Mechanical Code only. 12. Updates edition of adopted California Residential Code, including Chapters and Appendices to be adopted without any additional voluntary measures. 13. Readopts previous Code Amendment for wall and fence criteria that is exempt from permit requirements per historic City practices (identified for local amendment filing only). 14. Readopts previous Code Amendment for Class A Rated Roof Covering Materials per historic City practices (identified for local amendment filing only) and renaming of section to align with "2025" code language. 15. Updates edition of adopted California Green Building Standards Code only. 16. Updates edition of adopted California Fire Code with minor changes to adopted sections as recommended by Fire Marshal. 17. Updates local amendments to the California Fire Code as recommended by Fire Marshal. 18. Updates edition of adopted California Energy Code only. 19. Adds Section 8.14.020, entitled "Amendments to the California Energy Code", to amend the Energy Code to continue to permit the use of gas -fueled heating equipment for pools and spas in areas with existing gas availability. 20. Updates edition of adopted California Historical Building Code only. 21. Updates edition of adopted California Existing Building Code only. 22. Updates edition of adopted California Referenced Standards Code only. 23. Adds Chapter 8.18, entitled "Wildland-Urban Interface Code", Section 8.18.010, entitled "Adoption of the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code" and Section 8.18.020, entitled "Amendments and Additions to the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code" to adopt the California Wildland-Urban Interface Code with amendments as recommended by Fire Marshal. [END] 67 City of La Quints CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TI—' EXCUSE ABSENCE OF VICE CHAIRPERSON WEBB FROM THE DECEMBER 8, 2025, ARTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION QUARTERLY MEETING RECOMMENDATION Excuse absence of Vice Chairperson Sean Webb from the December 8, 2025, Arts and Community Services Commission quarterly meeting. EXECUTIVE SUMMAKT • Vice Chairperson Webb requested to be excused from the December 8, 2025, Arts and Community Services Commission meeting due to previously scheduled travel. • Vice Chairperson Webb has no unexcused absences for fiscal year 2025/26. FISCAL IMPACT — No meeting attendance compensation is paid to absent members. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Section 2.06.090 of the La Quinta Municipal Code states: "If any member of a board, commission or committee absents him or herself from two consecutive regular meetings or absents him or herself from a total of three regular meetings within any fiscal year, his/her office shall become vacant and shall be filled as any other vacancy. A board, commission or committee member may request advance permission from the city council to be absent at one or more regular meetings due to extenuating circumstances, and/or may request the city council to excuse an absence after -the -fact where such extenuating circumstances prevented the member from seeking advance permission to be absent. If such permission or excuse is granted by the city council, the absence shall not be counted toward the above -stated limitations on absences." ALTERNATIVES Council may deny this request, which would result in the absence being counted toward the Commissioner's limitation on absences as noted above. Prepared by: Amanda Guerrero, Records Technician Approved by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk we 70 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 3 PULLED FROM CONSENT CALENDAR AND CONSIDERED AS BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. A City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE RECIPIENT OF THE 2026 LA QUINTA SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARD RECOMMENDATION Approve recipient of the 2026 La Quinta Senior Inspiration Award. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Riverside County's Senior Inspiration Award (SIA) Program recognizes and honors outstanding senior citizens for volunteer service. • Each Coachella Valley city nominates a resident and/or volunteer for this program. Staff requested nominations from local community organizations. • The Arts and Community Services Commission (ACSC) reviewed the nominations and recommended Judy Hoffman for the SIA. FISCAL IMPACT — None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Riverside County's annual SIA recognizes senior citizens, 65 years of age or older, for their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. Staff solicited nominations from several local organizations including Greater Coachella Valley Chamber of Commerce, La Quinta Historical Society, La Quinta Rotary Club, and Riverside County Fire Department. Four nominations were received (Attachment 1): • Lorna Curran — Friends of the La Quinta Public Library • Judy Hoffman — Coachella Valley Foster Kids • Kathleen O'Regan — Hidden Harvest, Coachella Valley Disaster Preparedness Network, Ophelia Project • Priscilla Paltin — Housing Commission Only 1 nomination can be submitted from each Coachella Valley city. The ACSC reviewed and discussed the nominees during its December 8, 2025, Commission meeting and recommended Judy Hoffman for the 2026 SIA. 71 Judy Hoffman has dedicated more than a decade of volunteer service through multiple community programs including 5 years of service with Read with Me programs and 8 years of service with Child Protective Services, collaborating with caseworkers to secure approximately 92 holiday gifts annually for children in foster care. Judy also spent 8 years volunteering with La Quinta's Public Safety Department, assisting with public inquiries regarding lost items, code enforcement, traffic matters, and other community concerns routed through City Hall. Ms. Hoffman is an active member of the La Quinta Wellness Center Fitness Gym and prior to her extensive volunteer service, she worked for 25 years as a registered emergency room nurse in Cleveland, Chicago, and Harbor City. The award will be presented at the annual SIA luncheon on Wednesday, March 25, 2026, at the Grand Hyatt Resort & Spa in Indian Wells. ALTERNATIVES Staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Michael Calderon, Senior Management Analyst Approved by: Christina Calderon, Community Services Deputy Director Attachment: 1. SIA Nominees 72 ATTACHMENT 1 Riverside County Supervisor V. Manuel Perez presents 301 ANNUAL SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS 2026 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 34' year. Every year. the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 60 years of age and older who inspire others through their voluurteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our conmi pities. If you would like to nnonnunate someone for this luonnor, please complete this fornn and return to Carolune Doran, Attention: Caroline Doran at 78450 Avenida La Fonda. La Quinta, CA 92253 or via email at cdofan@laqtiintaca.gov. laquintaca.gov. Community Nomination Form Deadline: November 14, 2025 Eligible recipients must; -Be at least 60 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in the (La Quinta) - Coachella Valley or Palo Verde Valley -Be actively involved in conmmiunity affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the conunuunity -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Noininee Judy Hoffman 79 Name of Nominee M, ;I: jg, Email Phone Organization Individual Volunteers With Coachella Valley Foster Kids 5016 Child Protective Services Years with Organization Hours Volunteered 1000 hours works out of home Name of non-profit selected to receive S 1,000 donation on behalf of the nonunee: (Acceptable non -profits must have an emphasis oil Health, Mental health, and Juvenile intervention) Nominator Name of Nominator Carolute Doran City or Organization Juvenile Intervention City of La Quuunta Wellness Center Email Plnon cdoran@laqtiintaca.gov lagtnintaca.gov Reason for Nomination Acquires and finds resources for children in foster care to brighten -titeir�y�a-they�re�atfar�attan�y3aciety�as�can3id��Jtrdy. Senior Inspiration Award Nomination for 2026 Judy Hoffman - Deserving of Recognition by Jennifer Nelson / Caroline Doran Volunteer Experience: Read with Me Program Oasis Elementary School = 5 years Child Protective Services 501(c)3 - 8 years Works with case worker to find 92 gifts per year for children in foster care. Collects ear buds for children in foster care. Public Safety Department City of La Quinta - volunteer 8 years - triages phone calls to assist residents with their inquires about lost items, code concerns, traffic tickets, and matters that are funneled to the substation at City Hall - Public Safety department. Works out at the Wellness Center Fitness Gym - City of La Quinta History: RN Emergency Room nurse for 25 years, Cleavland Chicago City Harbor City. Please consider Ms. Judy Hoffman: Judy has great concerned for the children whom are in foster care so they are not forgotten. 74 `r,SV1RAro/V Riverside County Supervisor V. Manuel Perez presents 34th ANNUAL SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS 2026 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 34's year. Every year. the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 60 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor. please complete this form and return to Caroline Doran. Attention: Caroline Doran at 78450 Avenida La Fonda. La Quinta. CA 92253 or via email at cdoran@laquintaca.gov. Community Nomination Form Deadline: November 14, 2025 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 60 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in the Coachella Valley or Palo Verde Valley -Be actively involved in conummity affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy. active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee (88 years young) Name of Nominee Phone (contact Julie Lawson Tinnmer) Mailing Address Email Organization Individual Volunteers With Years with Organization Hours Volunteered Name of non-profit selected to receive $1.000 donation on behalf of the nominee: (Acceptable non -profits must have an emphasis on Health. Mental health. and Juvenile intervention.) Nominator Name of Nominator City or Organization Reason for Nomination Email Phon Ms. Lorna Curran Volunteer Experience: Friends of the La Quinta Library Assists with making available donated books in the hands of the community. The books stay in the Coachella Valley and sometimes free and sometimes priced at an affordable cost to encourage literacy, and enjoyment of reading for all. Books donated are sorted by their genre (fiction, non-fiction, biographies etcetera, and follow library guidelines to place in the bookstore. Books are priced very low so all can acquire a book. Books are sorted for children's programs and given out at no cost during events. Many boxes of book donations are given to the Friends of the La Quinta Library the revenue obtained by selling the books at the Friends of the Library bookstore shelp with costs of many library programs. Loran volunteers her many hours in the following programs. Dia De Los Ninos —1500 books have been sorted and check for quality and genre for this children's program. Each child is given a passport (like a punch card) for different stations at the Dia De Los Ninos event and with a passport card filled out are given their very own books. Book or Treat Halloween — provide a book in a gift bag with other items to encourage literacy. Loran and the volunteer team participate in book parties to organize the books and create gift bags for the children. 76 RA 1-1(>ti ett*#k Riverside County Supervisor V. Manuel Perez presents 34" ANNUAL SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS 2026 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event in its 34 h year. Every year, the County of Riverside and the Coachella Valley's nine cities honor senior citizens 60 years of age and older who inspire others through their volunteerism and active engagement in the community. This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing contribution and dedication to our communities. If you would like to nominate someone for this honor, please complete this form and return to Caroline Doran, Attention: Caroline Doran at 78450 Avenida La Fonda, La Quinta, CA 92253 or via email at cdoran'u�taquintaca.gov, Community Nomination Form Deadline: November 14, 2025 Eligible recipients must: -Be at least 60 years old -Reside and/or volunteer in the Coachella Valley or Palo Verde Valley -Be actively involved in community affairs for a lengthy period of time -Deserve to receive recognition and/or may not otherwise receive recognition for his or her service to the community -Personify a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and lifestyle Nominee acquiring from Ms. Paltin `I U Name of Nominee r t 5C 1 UQ �4 l �1 Yl\ Phone Mailing Address acquiring from Ms. Paltin Email 1 Organization Individual Volunteers With 1 nAo\. 5 t Y\ u n VV\ w\ t S S Ll") 0 Years with Organization 2 years Hours Volunteered I hour s (quarterly) 8 hours Name of non-profit selected to receive S 1,000 donation on behalf of the nominee: (Acceptable non -profits must have an emphasis on Health_ Mental health, and Juvenile intervention.) Nominator Name of Nominator V_)exb�C1iC'�_1l �— Phon I City or Organization r (j k_t y Ar., G ail _ us Reason for Nomination \-t) U D lVl O �- you e V\ow �-, I.. n . `... � c G fl ► ,. n ,ram !+. . ,, �, \apt RA I /U,L Riverside County Super .sor V Manus: Perez prisents 34" ANNUAL SENIOR INSPIRATION AWARDS 2026 The Senior Inspiration Awards is a beloved event to its 341 year. E•vcry year, the County of Riverside and the Conchclla Valley s nine cities honor senior citizens 60 years of agc and older who inspire others through thou volunlccrram andactive ungagenteni in the wtnman+ty This annual event honors these unsung heroes for their ongoing cordrthuntxt and dedication to our contmunn+es if you would like to nominate someone for this honor pleas; cumpictc this rcrm mid return to C'arolinc Duran, Attcotton Caroline Doran at 794511 Avenida Lu Fundrt, La Quinta, CA 92251 or via email at cdoran u laqumtaea.gov Community Nomination Form Deadline: November 14, 2025 hligtblc res.ipicnis must -fie at lean 60 years old -Reside und'or voluntutr in the (La Quinta) - Coache'la Valley or Palo Verde valley d3c 4ct)vcly involved in community affairs for d lengthy period of time •Uesene to receive recognition and•'or may not otherwise receiva recognition for his or her service to the commumty •Persnntfy a healthy, active, and contributing attitude and hfc5tyIr Nominee Name of Nominee Kathleen Megan Mailing Ph. ne- Mailing Address Finail Organization Individual Volunteer With Htdden I lar eit, Cwchcllu Valley Disaster 1're Network (C%'DPN). mentor for Ophelta I'ro jec4J7K Frwndation C-oachOla `,'a.ley public schools "I•.mjxtwer and encourage young Teem. Years with Organization 20 plus Hours Volunteered Over SAO Name of non profit selected to receive $1,000 donation on behalf of the n.nntncr: Hidden Harvest of Coachelht Nominated by: Lonna Coleman 1 78 Reason for Nomination: Kathleen O'Regan Please accept this enthusiastic nomination of Kathleen O'Regan for the 2025 Senior Inspiration Award to be bestowed by the City of La Quinta. In the community of Trilogy, home to dozens of dedicated volunteers who support a wide range of community organizations, Kathleen stands out as a shining example of living with commitment to helping others. As a matter of fact, in a committee meeting where the topic of making a nomination was raised, everyone present said one person came to mind first, our inspirational Kathleen O'Regan. So, while this nomination is from me, individually, there is a great deal of support for the nomination among those who know and admire Kathleen's community activism. The first time I met Kathleen to discuss community business, I was prepared to be intimidated. I knew a little about her distinguished military career launched in an era when few women thrived and rose to senior ranks in the military. I knew she would be smart, strong, and unique. I must admit her stories of Pentagon meetings, arms control initiatives, and space exploration were more interesting than the community business. But I also was delighted to meet the retired officer who is dedicated to contributing that same energy and strength into making the Coachella Valley a better place for residents in need. As a retired Air Force Colonel, Kathleen approaches volunteerism with discipline, skill, and dedication. Kathleen maintains a full plate of volunteer commitments at multiple. non-profit organizations in the Coachella Valley and has also held multiple volunteer positions here in our Trilogy community, frequently in a leadership role. Kathleen is not only a generous supporter of the charitable organizations to which she personally donates, but also a passionate advocate for causes that uplift others throughout the Coachella Valley. Her impact is far-reaching, helping numerous nonprofits secure grant funding, boost volunteer engagement, and increase financial contributions to initiatives that serve our region. At Trilogy La Quinta, Kathleen plays a vital role on the Emergency Preparedness Committee as Co -Chair of the First Aid Committee. She was also the driving force behind the creation of Trilogy's Charitable Works Committee, serving as its founding Chairperson. In its first year, the committee hosted six successful events, including a Charity Fair that Kathleen developed and led. This event connected residents with thirteen local nonprofits, offering opportunities to volunteer or donate. It is now institutionalized and is an event the Committee sponsors every year. Kathleen has been a consistent supporter of the Christmas gift bag initiative for veterans at Loma Linda VA Hospital and Veterans Village in Cathedral City, helping provide new clothing and toiletries for the past five years. Most recently, she was a key 79 organizer and contributor to our Veterans Dinner and Silent Auction held on November 11th. The event welcomed ninety-eight attendees and raised $6,000 to support college scholarships for local high school ROTC cadets. Beyond Trilogy, Kathleen volunteers extensively across the Valley: For the past three years, she has served twice monthly with Hidden Harvest, distributing free produce to senior centers in Indio and Coachella, and to La Quinta's Seasons low-income housing. Over the last two years, she has supported Coachella Valley Disaster Preparedness by assisting with presentations such as Stop the Bleed and earthquake readiness. This year, she began mentoring young girls at Coachella High School through the nonprofit Ophelia, helping empower the next generation of women. Kathleen's unwavering commitment, compassion, and tireless service make her a true asset to our Trilogy community and the greater Coachella Valley. Her leadership and generosity inspire all of us. The City of La Quinta 2025 Senior Inspiration Award would be very appropriately awarded to Ret. Colonel Kathleen O'Regan. Thank you for your consideration. :1 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 4 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETIN( December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ANNUAL REPORT RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the fiscal year 2024/25 Art in Public Places Annual Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Per the Municipal Code, the City must expend or commit fees from the Art in Public Places (APP) program within 2 years of receipt and monies collected must be accounted for in a separate fund. • An annual review of administrative expenses is required. There were no administrative expenses for fiscal year (FY) 2024/25. • Attachment 1 presents the required analysis; the City has complied with the time limit for expenditure of fees and there are no findings to report. FISCAL IMPACT — None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City's APP fund is governed by La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 2.65. Annually, the City must demonstrate that it has complied with the following: • A determination whether or not the fees have been committed for use within two years of collection. Fees may be used for: ✓ Cost of public art and installation; ✓ Cost to purchase or lease art sites; ✓ Waterworks, landscaping, lighting and other objects, which are an integral part of the artwork; ✓ Frames, mats, pedestals and other objects necessary for the proper presentation and installation of the artwork; ✓ Walls, pools, landscaping or other architectural or landscape architectural elements necessary for the proper aesthetic and structural placement of the artwork; m ✓ Maintaining and repairing artwork; ✓ Administrative expenses to otherwise implement the APP program; ✓ Endowments; and ✓ Art replacement. • Review administrative expenses to ensure they were reasonably assessed to implement this program and that they do not exceed 5% of the total funds in the account on July 1 of any year or $25,000 in any FY. If fees collected are not committed for the aforementioned uses, they are returned to the contributor. Staff analyzed APP fund revenues and expenditures, no reimbursements are due to contributors and there were no administrative costs. During FY 2024/25, APP funds were used to purchase art pieces, pedestal and mural design, and to maintain and preserve art pieces as detailed in Attachment 1. In FY 2024/25, the City unveiled a landscape painting titled "Lake La Quinta Sunrise" created by Artist Erin Hanson, selected at the Spring Art Celebration event. The painting is pictured here and located inside the City Hall lobby. Also unveiled during the year is an original bas relief sculpture made from exotic woods and hand formed copper and bronze. The piece is titled "Tree of Life" and was created by Artist Patrick McCauley. Selected at the Fall Art Celebration event, the piece is pictured here and displayed ins Hall lobby. Each year this report is also provided to the Desert Valley Builders Association (DVBA), the Building Industry Association (BIA), and the Gas Company. To date, no correspondence has been received regarding this report. Any future correspondence will be published on the City's website. ALTERNATIVES As this report is a requirement of the Municipal Code, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Virginia Ortega, Finance Manager Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. Art in Public Places FY 2024/25 Annual Financial Report :. City of La Quinta Art in Public Places (Fund 270) FY 2024/25 ATTACHMENT 1 The Art in Public Places fund is used to account for fees paid in lieu of acquisition, installation, replacement, maintenance and repair of approved art works at approved sites. The fees are refundable if not expended or committed within two years. Beginning Ending Fund Balance Fund Balance Account Description at 7/1/2024 FY 24/25 at 6/30/2025 Revenues & Other Sources: Developer fees 101,383 Interest income 51,322 Transfers In from the General Fund 50,000 Total Sources $ 202,705 Expenditures & Other Uses Art Purchases 43,900 Maintenance of Public Art 77,978 Project Administration - Transfers Out for Construction Art Project 52,547 Total Uses 1 174,424 Total Available $ 974,839 $ 28,281 $ 1,003,119 Two Year Test Using First In First Out Method Beginning Revenues Summary of Funds Fund Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent June 30, 2021 692,026 135,933 63,345 729,200 35,414 June 30, 2022 764,614 189,831 120,748 766,522 67,175 June 30, 2023 833,697 145,711 108,047 734,211 137,150 June 30, 2024 871,361 224,684 121,206 728,299 246,540 June 30, 2025 974,839 202,705 174,424 675,752 327,367 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 898,864 $ 587,771 Result : Two Year Spent or Committed Test Met. Future commitments for unspent funds are detailed below Art in Public Places Expenses and Future Commitments Capital Projects and Expenses FY 24/25 Committed % Complete' % funded with fee Sculpture Restorations and Maintenance 65,000 100% 100% Acknowledgement Plaques and Signs 12,978 100% 100% Art Appraisals and Assessments 7,500 100% 100% SilverRock Park Pedestal Design 1,500 100% 100% LQAC Art Purchase: "Tree of Life" by Patrick McCauley 5,100 100% 100% LQAC Art Purchase: "Joy" by Karo Martirosyan 4,100 100% 100% LQAC Art Purchase: "Lake La Quinta Sunrise'T' Ocotillo Sunset" by Erin Hanson 6,000 100% 100% Art Purchase: City Hall Mural (Deposit) by Nathan Frizzell 12,500 100% 100% LQAC Art Purchase: "Circle Series" by Red Wolf Fine Art 7,200 - 100% 100% 111205 Dune Palms Bridge Improvements - 193,965 98% 1% 201608/202334 SilverRock Event Space /Art Pedestals 52,547 248,787 100% 0% FY 2025/26 Budget for Art Purchases and Maintenance - 2%:%0 17% 100% Total 174,424 675,752 ' Percentage completed as of June 30, 2025 83 84 City of La Quinta CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 5 CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FEE REPORT RECOMMENDATION Receive and file the fiscal year 2024/25 Development Project Fee Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Development Impact Fees (DIF) are imposed on new construction to help offset impacts created by new development on City facilities and infrastructure. • The State Mitigation Fee Act requires the City to annually report on the receipts and expenditures of DIF Funds for the last 5 years within 180 days of the close of the fiscal year. • The City must use, or pledge to use, the developer fees on City facilities and infrastructure within 5 years of receipt; or present findings if that was not the case. • Staff has completed the required analysis (Attachments 1 and 2) and in all cases the City has complied with the time limit to expend or commit fees for future projects. FISCAL IMPACT — None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City has 3 development project category fees subject to State requirements — Infrastructure, Quimby, and DIF. Annually, the City reports on the following: • Brief description on the type of fee in the account or fund; • Amount of the fee; • Beginning and ending balance of the account or fund; • Amount of fees collected and interest earned; • Each public improvement on which fees were expended, the amount of expenditures, and total percentage of the project completed and costs funded with the fee; • Description of each interfund transfer, loan, and the public improvement funded. W The City must also report payments received pursuant to development agreements entered into after January 1, 2004. A schedule of development agreement payments received, and expenditures are noted in Attachment 2. All projects were reported in the prior fiscal year (FY). Unspent balances will be evaluated for appropriation during the FY 2026/27 budget cycle. Civic Center DIF (Fund 252) Community Center DIF (Fund 254) Street Maintenance DIF (Fund 255 Park Maintenance DIF (Fund 256) Fire Protection DIF (Fund 257) $ 1,801,755 $ 110,661 $ 88,781 $ 8,361 $ 699,270 Each year these reports are also provided to the Desert Valley Builders Association (DVBA), the Building Industry Association (BIA), and the Gas Company. To date, no correspondence has been received regarding these reports. Any future correspondence will be published on the City's website. ALTERNATIVES This report is required by State, staff does not recommend an alternative. Prepared by: Virginia Ortega, Finance Manager Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. FY 2024/25 Development Project Fee Report 2. FY 2024/25 Developer Agreement Activity Report • 2025 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Quimby Fees (Fund 220) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2025 ATTACHMENT 1 The City's Quimby Special Revenue Fund is used to account for the accumulation of developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and improvements. Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 24/25 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Contributions from Property Owners Transfers In - - - - Total Revenue Sources 0 Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers out - - Total Uses 0 Total Available $ - $ - $ - Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent Balance Collected Revenues Collected from 2021 1,565,574 35,415 1,600,989 1,180,635 (1,180,635) Revenues Collected from 2022 - - 713,669 466,967 (1,180,635) Revenues Collected from 2023 (713,669) 21,791 445,176 (1,180,636) Revenues Collected from 2024 (735,460) (735,460) 445,176 (445,176) Revenues Collected from 2025 - - - - Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 35,415 $ 1,600,989 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 24/25 Committed % Complete* % funded with fee Total $ - $ - Percentage completed as of 6/30/2025 87 2025 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Infrastructure Fee (Fund 225) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2025 The Infrastructure fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City's infrastructure as defined in Resolution 2013-006. Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 24/25 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees' Interest Income Reimbursements 1,091 - Total Revenue Sources $ 1,091 Expenditures & Other Uses Capital Projects Project Administration/Internal Engineering - Total Uses - Total Available $ 20,194 $ 1,091 $ 21,285 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent Balance Collected Revenues Collected from 2021 19,408 (10) 22,618 (3,220) Revenues Collected from 2022 19,398 (450) 22,618 (3,670) Revenues Collected from 2023 18,948 294 22,618 (3,376) Revenues Collected from 2024 19,242 952 22,618 (2,424) Revenues Collected from 2025 20,194 1,091 21,285 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 1 $ 1,877 $ - Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 24/25 Committed % Complete` % funded with fee Total $ Percentage completed as of 6/30/2025 '* The Infrastructure Fee is being phased out and not subject to collection of future revenue from developments. ;rz 2025 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Transportation DIF (Fund 250) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2025 The Transportation Impact Fee developer fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for street system improvements needed to handle traffic that will be generated by future development. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 4,009 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 3,076 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 2,281 Office/Medical Unit $ 6,542 General Commercial 1,000 sq ft $ 8,057 Tourist Commercial/Lodging 1,000 sq ft $ 1,859 Golf Course Acre $ 930 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 24/25 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In 421,135 312,599 - - Total Revenue Sources 733,734 Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers out Capital Projects 400,000 38,968 Total Uses 438,968 Total Available $ 5,868,008 $ 294,765 $ 6,162,774 Five Year Test Usinq First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent Balance Collected Revenues Collected from 2021 2,321,502 688,043 745,418 4,356,480 (2,092,353) Revenues Collected from 2022 2,266,489 2,636,980 400,000 3,956,480 546,989 Revenues Collected from 2023 4,503,469 1,810,531 795,857 3,519,775 1,998,367 Revenues Collected from 2024 5,518,142 762,133 412,267 5,237,567 630,441 Total Revenue For Last Five Years Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 792,510 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 24/25 Committed % Complete' % funded with fee 111205 Dune Palms Bridge Improvement - 56,799 98% 1% 201702 Developer Reimbursements 400,000 3,200,000 114% 100% 201902 Avenue 50 Bridge Spanning Evacuation 16,958 938,819 1.68% 6% 202205 Avenue 50 Widening Improvements 6,796 1,250,022 4.10% 61% 202302 Avenue 52 Monroe Street (Traffic Signal) 7,934 139,524 6.98% 100% 202410 Avenue 52/Jefferson Roundabout Safety 7,281 592,719 1.21 % 100% Total $ 438,968 $ 6,177,883 * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2025 -* 2025 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Parks & Rec DIF (Fund 251) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2025 The Parks & Recreation Impact Fee fund is used to account for the accumulation of resources, provided through developer fees for parks required to serve future development. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 2,106 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 1,794 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 1,716 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 24/25 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In 120,042 89,095 - - Total Revenue Sources 209,137 Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers Out Capital Projects - 194,665 Total Uses 194,665 Total Available $ 1,670,697 $ 14,472 $ 1,685,169 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent Balance Collected Revenues Collected from 2021 294,027 322,133 962,469 2,844 (349,153) Revenues Collected from 2022 (346,309) 1,020,577 - - 674,268 Revenues Collected from 2023 674,268 963,656 28,715 474,129 1,135,080 Revenues Collected from 2024 1,609,209 339,158 277,670 651,794 1,018,903 Revenues Collected from 2025 1,670,697 209,137 194,665 648,950 1,036,219 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 2,854,661 $ 1,463,519 Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 FY 24/25 Committed % Complete" % funded with Capital Improvement Facilities fee 202102 Fritz Burns Park Improvements 194,665 - 17% 6% 202306 La Quinta Parks Phase 1 - 648,950 0% 100% Total $ 194,665 $ 648,950 " Percentage completed as of 6/30/2025 W 2025 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Civic Center DIF (Fund 252) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2025 The Civic Center Impact Fee fund was used to fund the expansion of the La Quinta Civic Center completed in 2008 to support the City's needs through build out. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 1,230 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 1,115 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 628 Office/Medical Unit $ 522 General Commercial 1,000 sq ft $ 522 Tourist Commercial/Lodging 1,000 sq ft $ 698 Golf Course Acre $ 251 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 24/25 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In 82,724 103,344 - - Total Revenue Sources 186,069 Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers Out - - Total Uses 1 0 Total Available 1 $ 1,865,611 $ 186,069 1 $ 2,051,680 Five Year Test Usinq First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2021 301,271 197,349 498,620 Revenues Collected from 2022 498,620 627,911 - 1,126,531 Revenues Collected from 2023 1,126,531 541,239 75 249,925 1,417,770 Revenues Collected from 2024 1,667,695 197,916 249,925 1,615,686 Revenues Collected from 2025 1,865,611 186,069 249,925 1,801,755 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 1 $ 1,750,483 $ 75 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 % funded with FY 24/25 Committed % Complete * Capital Improvement Facilities fee 202202 City Hall Capacity Improvements $ 249,925 0% 31 % Total $ $ 249,925 * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2025 ** Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written -off. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $1,801,755 and will be included in the FY 2026/27 budget. 91 2025 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Library DIF (Fund 253) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2025 The Library Impact Fee fund is used for library facilities required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 397 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 338 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 323 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 24/25 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In 22,629 0 Total Revenue Sources 22,629 Expenditures & Other Uses Advance Interest Expense - 23,423 Total Uses 23,423 Total Available 1 $ (1,118,627) $ (794) $ (1,119,421) Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Balance Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2021 (1,505,187) 61,508 15,133 1,458,789 (2,917,601) Revenues Collected from 2022 (1,458,812) 196,648 11,112 1,273,276 (2,546,552) Revenues Collected from 2023 (1,273,276) 180,153 25,504 1,118,627 (2,237,254) Revenues Collected from 2024 (1,118,627) 32,495 32,495 1,118,627 (2,237,254) Revenues Collected from 2025 1,118,627 22,629 23,423 1,118,627 2,238,048 $ 493,433 $ 107,667 Total Revenue For Last Five Years Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 24/25 Committed % Complete % funded with fee Successor Agency loan repayment (construction of 23,423 1,118,627 55% 100% public library facility) " Total $ 23,423 $ 1,118,627 Percentage completed as of 6/30/2025 Loan repayment interest rate is based on the average quarterly investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. As of 6/30/2025 the outstanding loan balance was: Principal 1,118,627 Interest - Total Due 1,118,627 'IA 2025 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Community Center DIF (Fund 254) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2025 The Community Center Fee fund is used for community center facilities required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 956 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 814 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 779 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 24/25 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In 54,492 56,169 - - Total Revenue Sources 110,661 Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers Out Capital Projects - 314,647 Total Uses 314,647 Total Available $ 1,107,561 1 $ (203,985) $ 903,575 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent Balance Collected Revenues Collected from 2021 192,753 143,272 101,639 125,000 109,387 Revenues Collected from 2022 234,387 339,454 - 125,000 448,842 Revenues Collected from 2023 573,841 406,479 125,000 855,319 Revenues Collected from 2024 980,319 127,241 - 625,000 482,561 Revenues Collected from 2025 1,107,561 110,661 314,647 792,914 110,661 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 1 $ 1,127,108 $ 416,286 Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 % funded with Capital Improvement Facilities FY 24/25 Committed % Complete * fee 201901 Village Art Plaza Promenade & Cultural Campus 314,647 792,914 26% 13% Total $ 314,647 $ 792,914 Percentage completed as of 6/30/2025 Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $110,661 and will be included in the FY 2026/27 budget. 93 2025 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Street Maintenance DIF (Fund 255) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2025 The Street Maintenance Fee fund is used for street maintenance required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 313 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 247 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 198 Office/Medical Unit $ 374 General Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 461 Tourist Commercial/Lodging 1000 sq ft $ 106 Golf Course Acre $ 53 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 24/25 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In - 4,551 - - Total Revenue Sources 4,551 Expenditures & Other Uses - Total Uses 0 Total Available $ 84,231 $ 4,551 $ 88,781 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent Balance Collected Revenues Collected from 2021 39,130 4,158 43,288 Revenues Collected from 2022 43,288 32,497 75,785 Revenues Collected from 2023 75,785 4,475 80,260 Revenues Collected from 2024 80,260 3,970 84,231 Revenues Collected from 2025 84,231 4,551 0 88,781 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 49.651 $ - Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 24/25 Committed % Complete ` % funded with fee Total $ - $ - " Percentage completed as of 6/30/2025 Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written -off. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $88,781 and will be included in the FY 2026/27 budget. 94 2025 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Park Maintenance DIF (Fund 256) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2025 The Park Maintenance Fee fund is used for park maintenance required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 313 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 247 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 198 Office/Medical Unit $ 374 General Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 461 Tourist Commercial/Lodging 1000 sq ft $ 106 Golf Course Acre $ 53 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 24/25 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In - 429 Total Revenue Sources 429 Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers Out - - Total Uses 0 Total Available I $ 7,933 1 $ 429 1 $ 8,361 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2021 5,723 272 5,995 Revenues Collected from 2022 5,995 (97) 5,898 Revenues Collected from 2023 5,898 1,661 7,559 Revenues Collected from 2024 7,559 374 7,933 Revenues Collected from 2025 7,933 429 8,361 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 1 1 $ 2,638 I $ - Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 24/25 Committed % Complete * % funded with fee Total $ - $ " Percentage completed as of 6/30/2025 * Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quartery investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written -off. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $8,361 and will be included in the FY 2026/27 budget. 95 2025 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Fire Protection DIF (Fund 257) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2025 The Fire Protection Facilities Fee fund is used for fire protection facilities required to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 369 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 335 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 188 Office/Hospital Unit $ 151 General Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 151 Tourist Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 201 Golf Course Acre $ 72 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 24/25 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In 24,682 35,300 - - Total Revenue Sources 59,982 Expenditures & Other Uses - Total Uses 0 Total Available $ 639,289 $ 59,982 $ 699,270 Five Year Test Using First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Revenues Expenditures Committed Unspent Balance Collected Revenues Collected from 2021 136,036 61,224 - 197,260 Revenues Collected from 2022 197,260 212,043 - 409,304 Revenues Collected from 2023 409,304 167,005 - 576,309 Revenues Collected from 2024 576,308 62,980 - 639,289 Revenues Collected from 2025 639,289 59,982 - 699,270 Total Revenue For Last Five Years $ 563,235 $ - Result : Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 Capital Improvement Facilities FY 24/25 Committed % Complete % funded with fee Total $ - $ Percentage completed as of 6/30/2025 '* Loan repayment interest rate was based on the average quarterly investment yield of the City's investment portfolio. During FY 2018/19, this loan was written -off. Projects are being evaluated for the unspent balance of $699,270 and will be included in the FY 2026/27 budget. 2025 AB1600 Report La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Maintenance Facilities DIF (Fund 259) Government Code 66000 Calculation FYE 6/30/2025 The Maintenance Facilities Fee fund is used for corporate yard maintenance facilities and equipment needed to serve future development in La Quinta. The fee is based upon the table below and varies from project to project. Activity Unit of Measure Transportation Residential - Single Family Detached Unit $ 313 Residential - Single Family Attached Unit $ 247 Residential - Multi Family and Other Unit $ 198 Office/Medical Unit $ 374 General Commercial 1000 sq ft $ 461 Tourist Commercial/Lodging 1000 sq ft $ 106 Golf Course Acre $ 53 Account Description Beginning Fund Balance FY 24/25 Ending Fund Balance Developer Fees Interest Income Miscellaneous Transfers In 28,896 15,735 - - Total Revenue Sources 44,631 Expenditures & Other Uses Transfers Out - 280,000 Total Uses 280,000.00 Total Available $ 362,526 $ (235,369) $ 127,157 Five Year Test Usina First In First Out Method Fiscal Years Ending Beginning Fund Balance Revenues Collected Expenditures Committed Unspent Revenues Collected from 2021 - 47,015 47,015 Revenues Collected from 2022 47,015 133,080 180,095 Revenues Collected from 2023 180,095 131,588 - 311,683 Revenues Collected from 2024 311,683 50,843 - 280,000 82,526 Revenues Collected from 2025 $ 362,526 44,631 280,000 362,526 235,369 Total Revenue For Last Five Years 1 1 $ 407.157 $ 280.000 Result: Five Year Spent Test Met in accordance with Government Code 66001 FY 24/25 Committed % Complete * % funded with Capital Improvement Facilities fee 201805 Maintenance and Operations Yard 280,000 362,526 40% 24% Total $ 280,000 $ 362,526 * Percentage completed as of 6/30/2025 97 2025 AB1600 Report ATTACHMENT 2 La Quinta Development Project Fee Report Developer Agreement Activity (Fund 401) FYE 6/30/2025 The following development agreement payment was received for development agreements entered into after January 1, 2004 in accordance with Government Code Section 65865. Date Project/Purpose Balance Revenues Expenses Total 3/8/2010 Traffic Signals: Madison Street on Avenue 58 &Avenue 60 257,563.00 - 257,563.00 10/18/2010 Landscape Median: Monroe Avenue (Trilogy/Shea TM30023) 234,869.64 - 234,869.64 1/25/2016 Traffic Signal: Madison Street at Avenue 52 (Madison Club) 215,000.00 215,000.00 10/11/2016 Raised Median: Madison at Avenue 52 (TM33076-1) 59,642.00 - 59,642.00 6/14/2019 Turn Lane Extension: Highway 111 & Costco Drive 3,644.22 - 3,644.22 6/30/2020 Traffic Signal: Madison Street at Avenue 54 (CDA/Griffln Ranch) 107,500.00 - 107,500.00 6/30/2021 Turn Lane / Right Turn Only: Adams Street at Auto Centre 171,574.00 - 171,574.00 6/30/2023 Traffic Signal: Monroe at Avenue 52 20,755.35 - 20,755.35 Total Unearned 11/30/2009 Account No. 401-0000-22811 Revenue on -.. Lions Gate project 1821 sidewalk and landscaping 16,798.30 - $ 1,070,548.21 16,798.30 1/31/2011 Toll Brothers, Avenue 50 & Verano Drive, TM 30357, Mt. View Country Club Traffic Signal Improvements 215,000.00 215,000.00 6/30/2015 Avenue 53 at Jefferson Street Roundabout (580.85) (580.85) 6/30/2015 1 Traffic Signal Avenue 50 & Orchard, Project 1757 99,075.26 - 99,075.26 2/24/2016 ACM LQ/Highway 111 & Simon Drive 2,788.50 2,788.50 2/24/2016 ACM LQ/Washington & Miles 8,460.00 - 8,460.00 6/30/2019 Dune Palms Road Widening Eminent Domain 19,882.32 - 19,882.32 6/30/2023 Cove Trails Parking Lot Improvements - - - Account No. 401-0000-22210 $ 361,423.53 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 6 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 MEASURE G SALES TAX COMPLIANCE REPORT RECOMMENDATION Receive and file fiscal year 2024/25 Measure G Sales Tax Compliance Report. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Measure G revenue for fiscal year (FY) 2024/25 was $15,638,218 and the Measure G reserve balance as of June 30, 2025 was $29,623,592. • The Financial Advisory Commission (Commission) provides oversight of Measure G revenue and prepares an annual Measure G Sales Tax Oversight Report (Report) to ensure Measure G revenue is used in compliance with the ballot initiative. • At its special meeting on December 3, 2025, the Commission unanimously and formally received and filed the Report. FISCAL IMPAC i —None BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS In accordance with the Measure G ballot measure, the Commission provides oversight of Measure G funds. This Report was prepared by the Finance Department with assistance from Commission members (Commissioners Anderson and Mast). The Report was presented, received, and filed at a special Commission meeting on December 3, 2025; and will be posted to the City's website. The Report for FY 2024/25 (Attachment 1) covers the period from July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025, and provides a summary of the Measure G revenue and expenditures for the FY, as well as an inception -to -date summary. ALTERNATIVES Council may request additional information before filing this Report. Prepared by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachment: 1. Annual Measure G Sales Tax Oversight Report for Fiscal Year -Ended June 30, 2025 •• ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF LA QU I NTA 6 46 Tif 'AMU —ell ,-lN4 ,. . �`" .fir_ - __ T 7� _ � � — _I � d�r - =• Annual Measure G Sales Tax Oversight Report Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2025 • Ct/ a California THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 101 ANNUAL MEASURE G SALES TAX OVERSIGHT REPORT FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2025 OVERVIEW The Financial Advisory Commission (FAC) provides oversight of Measure G tax revenue. This Annual Measure G Sales Tax Oversight Report covers the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2024, through June 30, 2025. Exhibit A includes a detailed summary of all Measure G activity. Measure G is a 1 % transactions tax applied to sales of taxable goods and is part of the overall 8.75% sales tax rate in the City. It applies to goods transferred at the point of sale (businesses within La Quinta City limits), and to goods purchased in other jurisdictions that are delivered to addresses within the City. Measure G revenue continues to help La Quinta thrive and remains essential to the City's long- term financial health. These funds support the realization of La Quinta's Sacred Values — Fiscal Sustainability, Health and Wellness, a Vibrant and Safe Community, a Visually Beautiful City, and Cultural Diversity — ensuring that our community continues to shine as "The Gem of the Desert," now and for generations to come. Fritz Burns Park Improvements Highway 111 Pavement Rehabilitation REPORT HIGHLIGHTS Fiscal Year 2024/25 • Revenue from Measure G totaled approximately $15.6 million, which is slightly above the budgeted amount of $15.5 million and consistent with the prior fiscal year's revenue of $15.5 million, reflecting stable performance year over year. • An allocation of $12.2 million went towards citywide infrastructure and public recreational facility improvements, creating lasting assets for public use and enjoyment. • The City invested $7.3 million in public safety services, which continues to be a top priority for La Quinta. • Approximately $4 million of Measure G reserves was utilized for capital improvement projects, bringing the total reserve balance to $29.6 million. These reserves are intentionally maintained to ensure long-term financial stability and to provide flexibility during economic downturns. 1 102 Since Inception • $108 million in total Measure G funds has been collected, and the City continues to utilize these funds in alignment with the original intent of Measure G. • Approximately $45 million or 42% of Measure G funds have been allocated to improving citywide infrastructure and public recreational facilities. • Public safety services are a priority of La Quinta and have been supported with approximately $33.2 million or 31 % of Measure G funds. • Fiscally responsible budgeting, prudent long-term financial projections, funds oversight, and financial transparency have strengthened the City's reserves with Measure G funds since the implementation of Measure G in April 2017. These practices have supported the City's strong fiscal standing, reflected in its top ranking on the California Policy Center's Local Fiscal Health Dashboard. FISCAL YEAR 2024125 REVENUES Total Measure G sales tax revenue for fiscal year FY 2024/25 was $15.6 million, which was slightly higher than the $15.5 million initially anticipated when budgeted, reflecting stable performance and continued fiscal resilience despite broader economic headwinds. Revenue trends remained steady through FY 2024/25, with overall receipts showing modest year -over - year growth. While certain consumer sectors such as restaurants and online retail performed well, spending on goods and construction activity softened as households maintained cautious spending patterns. REVENUES SINCE INCEPTION The chart below summarizes Measure G revenue received from fiscal years 2016/17 through 2024/25. Measure G sales tax revenue for FY 2024/25 was slightly above initial projections, reflecting continued stability in local economic activity. While spending patterns remain cautious, recent reductions in federal interest rates have generated optimism for improved financing conditions and potential boosts in consumer confidence. However, ongoing national tariff discussions and persistent inflationary pressures continue to influence household spending power, contributing to a period of modest growth as the broader economy adjusts to changing market conditions. Staff will closely monitor these trends and adjust projections as needed to ensure prudent financial planning for the years ahead. REVENUES SINCE INCEPTION $108 MILLION $20 $15 c $10 $5 will 16/17 17/18 18/19 19/20 20/21 21/22 22/23 23/24 24/25 Fiscal Year 103 FISCAL YEAR 2024/25 USEf Operational expenses and capital improvements for FY 2024/25 were prioritized, with approximately $12.2 million in Measure G funds allocated toward Capital Improvement Projects citywide and $7.3 million allocated to public safety. To support these priorities, about $4 million in Measure G reserves were utilized. No additional revenue was set aside for reserves this fiscal year, as the focus remained on advancing key infrastructure, facility, and community enhancement projects that align with the City's long-term strategic goals. USES SINCE INCEPTION Annually, the City hosts a community workshop to either affirm and/or redirect the following year's budget priorities. Staff then evaluates funding options such as grants, interagency cost sharing, and use of reserves. Public safety services have been a community priority since before Measure G, and with the support of this additional revenue, the City has been able to maintain the public safety service levels the community desires. The chart below summarizes the uses since the inception of Measure G funds. Approximately, $45 million, or 42% of these funds are for projects to improve citywide infrastructure and public recreational facilities. USES SINCE INCEPTION $108 MILLION Reserve01 s $30M Public Safety $33M Recreation $12M Infrastructure Improvements $33M • Public Safety use reflects the City's continuing commitment to providing all residents with a safe living environment. • Infrastructure improvement projects have included numerous road repairs to extend their useful life, street striping projects, drainage improvements to avoid street flooding, an investment in Highway 111 (a crucial commercial corridor for our City where a majority of sales taxes are generated), an overhaul of landscape medians north of Highway 111, the design of an updated corporate yard with administrative and crew quarters, and Welcome Center improvements for city -owned property located near the entrance to the Bear Creek Trail on Eisenhower Drive and Calle Tampico. • Recreation projects have included funding for the new X-Park near La Quinta High School, the SilverRock event site, design of a new future Village Art Plaza Promenade & Cultural Campus connected to the La Quinta Museum, Fritz Burns Park improvements, citywide dog park improvements, and the Sports Complex lighting replacement. 3 104 • Measure G reserves reflect fiscal responsibility and allow for operational flexibility by ensuring cash is available for public safety services and capital improvement projects when they are most efficient to complete. The chart below summarizes citywide infrastructure improvements and recreational projects, totaling about $45 million funded with Measure G revenues. Infrastructure Improvements and Recreational Projects Public Safety $1.8M Camera System Highway 111 $7.3M Roads/Bridges M $4.1 M Drainage $3.4M Parks $12.4M Landscaping City Facilities/Other S $6.5M $0 $2 $4 $6 $8 $10 $12 $14 Millions LOOKING AHEAD As La Quinta continues to navigate shifting economic conditions, Measure G remains essential to the City's ability to sustain core services and invest in community priorities. While the broader economy is showing cautious optimism following recent reductions in federal interest rates, ongoing tariff discussions and inflationary pressures continue to shape household spending and local sales trends. Looking forward, the City will continue to strategically invest Measure G funds in projects that strengthen infrastructure, enhance public safety, and improve quality of life, while maintaining a disciplined and transparent approach to financial management. Key areas of focus include: • Critical electrical and utility infrastructure upgrades to improve system reliability, capacity, and safety- including enhancements to energy gridlines and transformers that reduce fire risk and ensure home security systems and essential services remain online. • Public safety facilities and technology investments to ensure continued community protection • Roadway, bridge, and transportation improvements supporting connectivity and safety • Revitalization of the Highway 111 Corridor and enhancement of public spaces that promote economic vitality and community pride These efforts demonstrate La Quinta's commitment to fiscal sustainability, proactive planning, and resident -centered investment. Measure G funding remains a cornerstone of this 4 105 commitment, preserving the City's financial strength and enabling La Quinta to uphold its Sacred Values of Fiscal Sustainability, Health and Wellness, a Vibrant and Safe Community, a Visually Beautiful City, and Cultural Diversity, ensuring that our community continues to shine as "The Gem of the Desert" for generations to come. MEASURE G BACKGROUND AND COMPLIANCE SUMMARY Voters approved Ballot Measure G in November 2016, establishing a permanent one percent (1 %) transactions and use tax effective April 1, 2017. All Measure G revenues are fully allocated to the City of La Quinta and are protected from State takeaways. Measure G revenues are used in accordance with the voter -approved ballot measure to fund essential services and community priorities, including: • Public safety, such as police protection • Capital improvement projects, including parks, streets, landscaping, and flood mitigation • Community programs that attract businesses, support youth and senior services, enhance sports and recreation opportunities • Preservation of property values and quality of life for residents This report confirms that all Measure G tax revenues are properly recorded and are being used in full compliance with the requirements outlined in the ballot measure. The City Council, management, and staff express their sincere appreciation to La Quinta residents for their continued support and investment in maintaining the City's long-term financial sustainability and outstanding community character. Prior oversight reports and information on Measure G are located online at https://www.laguintaca.gov/business/tax-measure. Questions regarding this report or the use of Measure G funds may be directed to the Finance Department by calling 760-777-7000 or by email at finance@laquintaca.gov. 5 106 MEASURE G REVENUE AND USES SUMMARY FY 2024/25 EXHIBIT A Fiscal Year (FY) REVENUE SUMMARY 2016/17 Actual $ 1,462,650 2017/18 Actual 9,967,657 2018/19 Actual 10,958,118 2019/20 Actual 10,310,526 2020/21 Actual 12,594,389 2021 /22 Actual 15,615,802 2022/23 Actual 16,088,087 2023/24 Actual 15,471,183 2024/25 Actual 15,638,218 MEASURE G USES- TOTAL $ Historical 108,106,630 Fiscal Year Project Description Operational Capital Reserves Total by Year 2016/17-2021/22 Total Operational- Public Safety 15,708,000 Total Capital- Various 29,846,099 15,355,043 2022/23 Public Safety Contract Services 5,100,000 Landscape Renovation Improvements 500,000 Sports Complex Lighting Replacement 300,000 Village Utilities Undergrounding Project 100,000 ADA Transition Plan Update 150,000 Village Parking Lot 500,000 Phase II Public Safety Camera System 1,797,000 Smart Infrastructure Improvements- Feasibility 250,000 Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation 1,000,000 Dune Palms Bridge Advance Funding Reimbursement (7,468,061) Measure G Reserves 2022/23 13,859,148 16,088,087 2023/24 Public Safety Contract Services 5,100,000 Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation 1,000,000 Avenue 48 Art & Music Line 2,400,000 Fritz Burns Park Improvements 1,500,000 Highway 111 Event Site- Reprogrammed to Fritz Burns Park, see FY 2024/25 - Washington St. Connector to Arts & Music Line 1,200,000 Measure G Reserves 2023/24 4,271,183 15,471,183 2024/25 Public Safety Contract Services 7,300,000 Pavement Management Plan Street Improvements 1,000,000 Corporate Yard Administration Offices & Crew Quarters 900,000 Village Art Plaza Promenade & Cultural Campus 1,000,000 Highway 111 Corridor Area Plan Implementation 3,050,000 Fritz Burns Park Improvements 5,000,000 Citywide Dog Park Improvements 500,000 Welcome Center Improvements 750,000 Measure G Reserves 2024/25 3,861,782 15,638,218 TOTAL $ 33,208,000 $ 45,275,038 $ 29,623,592 $ 108,106,630 31% 42% 27% 108 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 7 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED OCTOBER 31, 2025 RECOMMENDATION Receive and file revenue and expenditure report dated October 31, 2025. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The report summarizes the City's year-to-date (YTD) and month -to -date (MTD) revenues and expenditures for October 2025 (Attachment 1). • These reports are also reviewed by the Financial Advisory Commission. FISCAL IMPACT — None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS Below is a summary of the column headers used on the Revenue and Expenditure Summary Reports: Original Total Budget — represents revenue and expenditure budgets the Council adopted in June 2025 for fiscal year 2025/26. Current Total Budget — represents original adopted budgets plus any Council approved budget amendments from throughout the year. The 2024/25 operating and Capital Improvement Project (CIP) carryovers to 2025/26 will be processed after the year-end audit is completed. Period Activity— represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid in the reporting month. Fiscal Activity— represents actual revenues received and expenditures outlaid YTD. Variance Favorable/(Unfavorable) - represents the dollar difference between YTD collections/expenditures and the current budgeted amount. Percent Used — represents the percentage activity as compared to budget YTD. 109 October 2025 Revenues Comparison to 2024 Percent of Percent of MTD YTD Budget YTD Budget General Fund (GF) $ 3,693,392 $ 8,298,161 9.00% $ 7,788,555 9.42% Al Funds $ 5,554,706 $ 19,302,815 11.47% $ 12,441,955 7.92% October 2025 Expenditures Comparison to 2024 Percent of Percent of MTD YTD Budget YTD Budget General Fund $ 4,259,790 $ 13,911,791 14.99% $ 8,202,955 9.84% Payroll (GF) $ 937,179 $ 3,642,883 23.92% $ 3,364,351 23.81% All Funds $ 11,896,755 $ 45,520,341 29.14% $ 34,072,021 23.36%111 Top Five Revenue/Income Sources for October General Fund Non -General Fund Measure G Sales Tax $ 976,087 Allocated Interest $ 663,565 Transient Occupancy (Hotel) Tax $ 750,227 SilverRock Green Fees $ 221,113 Sales Tax $ 704,882 Gas Tax $ 199,182 Property Tax $ 642,546 County Sales Tax (Measure A) $ 144,901 Document Transfer Tax $ 99,230 Community Development Block Grant CDBG $ 138,248 i op rive txpenanuresiuuTiays Tor ucioper General Fund Non -General Fund Sheriff Contract (August) $ 1,237,937 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - Construction(2) $ 5,817,129 Public Safety Camera System Maintenance $ 209,876 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) - Design(3) $ 330,990 Membership Dues(l) $ 168,991 SilverRock Maintenance $ 214,539 Parks Landscape Maintenance Contract $ 95,819 Lighting & Landscape Maintenance Contract $ 133,083 Visit Greater Palm Springs $ 86,309 City Building Repairs $ 106,378 t'iCoachella Valley Power Agency (Z)CIP Construction - Fritz Burns Park improvements and shade structures; Hwy 111 pavement. �3iCIP Design - Avenue 50 bridge, drainage improvements, Washington/CV Link connector, Avenue 52/Jefferson roundabout, maintenance & operations yard. Revenues are not received uniformly throughout the year, resulting in peaks and valleys. For example, large property tax payments are usually received in December and May. Similarly, Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund payments are typically received in January and June. Any timing imbalance of revenue receipts versus expenditures is funded from the City's cash flow reserve. Unlike revenues, expenditures are more likely to be consistent from month to month. However, large debt service payments or CIP expenditures can cause swings. Prepared by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Approved by: Claudia Martinez, Finance Director/City Treasurer Attachment: 1. Revenue and Expenditure Report for October 31, 2025 110 ATTACHMENT 1 I City Council Month Revenue Report CALIFORNIA Group Summary For Fiscal: 2025/26 Period Ending: 10/31/2025 Variance Original Current Period Fiscal Favorable Percent Fun... Total Budget Total Budget Activity Activity (Unfavorable) Used 101- GENERAL FUND 92,242,254.00 92,242,254.00 3,693,391.82 8,298,160.57 -83,944,093.43 9.00% 105 - DISASTER RECOVERY FUND 172,000.00 172,000.00 0.00 -5,164.70 -177,164.70 3.00% 201- GAS TAX FUND 3,217,705.00 3,217,705.00 199,182.36 472,821.45 -2,744,883.55 14.69% 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 4,420,000.00 4,420,000.00 732.50 -10,340.79 -4,430,340.79 0.23% 203 - PUBLIC SAFETY FUND (MEASURE G) 6,000.00 6,000.00 0.00 -178.20 -6,178.20 2.97% 210- FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 160,100.00 160,100.00 138,248.03 138,248.03 -21,851.97 86.35% 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 121,000.00 121,000.00 109,869.94 109,213.17 -11,786.83 90.26% 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 3,862,100.00 3,862,100.00 14,099.54 32,587.23 -3,829,512.77 0.84% 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 91,000.00 91,000.00 3,947.14 10,507.76 -80,492.24 11.55% 223 - MEASURE A FUND 1,900,000.00 1,900,000.00 144,901.13 284,330.61 -1,615,669.39 14.96% 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (EMPG) 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 0.00 -10,000.00 0.00% 227 - STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAMS (SHSP) 5,400.00 5,400.00 0.00 0.00 -5,400.00 0.00% 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 24,000.00 24,000.00 1,652.00 6,085.45 -17,914.55 25.36% 231- SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 20,333,000.00 20,333,000.00 1,656.75 12,784.62 -20,320,215.38 0.06% 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 57,000.00 57,000.00 0.00 -139.45 -57,139.45 0.24% 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN 12,320.00 12,320.00 0.00 -184.15 -12,504.15 1.49% 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 1,666,000.00 1,666,000.00 95,779.16 427,329.13 -1,238,670.87 25.65% 243 - RDA LOW -MOD HOUSING FUND 130,000.00 130,000.00 0.00 -4,495.49 -134,495.49 3.46% 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 109,000.00 109,000.00 7,430.00 14,977.74 -94,022.26 13.74% 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2016) 86,000.00 86,000.00 0.00 24,596.56 -61,403.44 28.60% 250-TRANSPORTATION DIF FUND 579,000.00 579,000.00 40,090.00 159,506.12 -419,493.88 27.55% 251- PARKS & REC DIF FUND 203,000.00 203,000.00 21,060.00 72,526.75 -130,473.25 35.73% 252 - CIVIC CENTER DIF FUND 160,000.00 160,000.00 12,300.00 42,883.67 -117,116.33 26.80% 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 30,500.00 30,500.00 3,970.00 13,954.00 -16,546.00 45.75% 254 - COMMUNITY & CULTURAL CENTERS DIF 95,000.00 95,000.00 9,560.00 32,800.57 -62,199.43 34.53% 257 - FIRE PROTECTION DIF 51,000.00 51,000.00 3,690.00 12,773.97 -38,226.03 25.05% 259 - MAINTENANCE FACILITIES DIF FUND 47,000.00 47,000.00 3,130.00 12,265.08 -34,734.92 26.10% 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 181,000.00 181,000.00 10,664.64 30,900.20 -150,099.80 17.07% 299 - INTEREST ALLOCATION FUND 0.00 0.00 663,565.13 3,112,884.39 3,112,884.39 0.00% 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEBT SERVICE 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 -1,000.00 0.00% 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 24,293,033.00 24,293,033.00 36,481.24 2,918,415.86 -21,374,617.14 12.01% 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 1,745,500.00 1,745,500.00 27,858.61 420,349.43 -1,325,150.57 24.08% 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 4,195,000.00 4,195,000.00 16,265.58 1,097,192.72 -3,097,807.28 26.15% 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 1,035,000.00 1,035,000.00 0.00 242,594.86 -792,405.14 23.44% 504- INSURANCE FUND 1,395,941.00 1,395,941.00 0.00 343,625.43 -1,052,315.57 24.62% 601-SILVERROCKRESORT 5,470,000.00 5,470,000.00 237,312.98 591,238.47 -4,878,761.53 10.81% 760-SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN 7,000.00 7,000.00 0.00 -61.89 -7,061.89 0.88% 761- CERBT OPEB TRUST 40,000.00 40,000.00 0.00 108,680.12 68,680.12 271.70% 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST 200,000.00 200,000.00 57,867.79 279,145.63 79,145.63 139.57% Report Total: 168,353,853.00 168,353,853.00 5,554,706.34 19,302,814.92 -149,051,038.08 11.47% Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, published annually, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. Page 1 of 3 111 City Council Month Expense Report Group Summary For Fiscal: 2025/26 Period Ending: 10/31/2025 Variance Original Current Period Fiscal Favorable Percent Fun... Total Budget Total Budget Activity Activity (Unfavorable) Used 101- GENERAL FUND 92,822,188.00 92,822,188.00 4,259,790.47 13,911,790.95 78,910,397.05 14.99% 105 - DISASTER RECOVERY FUND 4,993,504.00 4,993,504.00 0.00 0.00 4,993,504.00 0.00% 201- GAS TAX FUND 3,224,885.00 3,224,885.00 102,340.66 540,028.66 2,684,856.34 16.75% 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 3,149,391.00 3,149,391.00 43,459.92 135,691.33 3,013,699.67 4.31% 210 - FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 160,000.00 160,000.00 0.00 0.00 160,000.00 0.00% 212 - SLESA (COPS) FUND 100,000.00 100,000.00 0.00 0.00 100,000.00 0.00% 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 3,854,500.00 3,854,500.00 349,577.18 1,071,644.82 2,782,855.18 27.80% 221- AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 205,000.00 205,000.00 7,000.00 24,664.50 180,335.50 12.03% 223 - MEASURE A FUND 1,124,132.00 1,124,132.00 0.00 0.00 1,124,132.00 0.00% 226 - EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE GRANT (EMPG) 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.00 10,335.00 -335.00 103.35% 227 - STATE HOMELAND SECURITY PROGRAMS (SHSP) 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00 5,000.00 0.00% 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 5,500.00 5,500.00 0.00 0.00 5,500.00 0.00% 231 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 RORF 4,271,147.00 4,271,147.00 0.00 15,115,644.82 -10,844,497.82 353.90% 235 - SO COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 40,000.00 40,000.00 0.00 0.00 40,000.00 0.00% 237 - SUCCESSOR AGCY PA 1 ADMIN 11,000.00 11,000.00 0.00 1,800.00 9,200.00 16.36% 241- HOUSING AUTHORITY 1,709,533.00 1,709,533.00 121,247.07 525,997.06 1,183,535.94 30.77% 243 - RDA LOW -MOD HOUSING FUND 325,000.00 325,000.00 0.00 375,000.00 -50,000.00 115.38% 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 31,500.00 31,500.00 85.00 766.67 30,733.33 2.43% 249 - SA 2011 LOW/MOD BOND FUND (Refinanced in 2016) 150,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00 150,000.00 0.00% 250-TRANSPORTATION DIF FUND 979,109.00 979,109.00 0.00 400,000.00 579,109.00 40.85% 253 - LIBRARY DEVELOPMENT DIF 15,000.00 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 15,000.00 0.00% 254 - COMMUNITY & CULTURAL CENTERS DIF 482,561.00 482,561.00 0.00 0.00 482,561.00 0.00% 259 - MAINTENANCE FACILITIES DIF FUND 362,526.00 362,526.00 0.00 0.00 362,526.00 0.00% 270-ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 233,000.00 233,000.00 0.00 36,495.78 196,504.22 15.66% 310 - LQ FINANCE AUTHORITY DEBT SERVICE 1,000.00 1,000.00 0.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00% 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 24,293,033.00 24,293,033.00 6,245,289.66 9,101,893.45 15,191,139.55 37.47% 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 1,745,913.00 1,745,913.00 163,106.85 304,755.77 1,441,157.23 17.46% 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 4,195,820.00 4,195,820.00 107,402.01 973,192.01 3,222,627.99 23.19% 503 - PARK EQUIP & FACILITY FUND 935,000.00 935,000.00 54,416.36 501,288.57 433,711.43 53.61% 504 - INSURANCE FUND 1,242,600.00 1,242,600.00 3,147.00 1,182,653.36 59,946.64 95.18% 601- SILVERROCK RESORT 5,517,000.00 5,517,000.00 436,847.82 1,281,507.34 4,235,492.66 23.23% 760 -SUPPLEMENTAL PENSION PLAN 12,850.00 12,850.00 0.00 12,832.86 17.14 99.87% 761- CERBT OPEB TRUST 1,500.00 1,500.00 0.00 399.13 1,100.87 26.61% 762 - PARS PENSION TRUST 30,000.00 30,000.00 3,044.60 11,959.11 18,040.89 39.86% Report Total: 156,239,192.00 156,239,192.00 11,896,754.60 45,520,341.19 110,718,850.81 29.14% Accounts are subject to adjusting entries and audit. The City's Annual Comprehensive Financial Report, published annually, is the best resource for all final audited numbers. Page 2 of 3 112 Fund Descriptions Fund # Name Notes 101 General Fund The primary fund of the City used to account for all revenue and expenditures of the City; a broad range of municipal activities are provided through this fund. 105 Disaster Recovery Fund Accounts for use of one-time federal funding designed to deliver relief to American workers and aid in the economic recovery iin the wake of COVID-19. The American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) was passed by Congress in 2021 to provide fiscal recovery funds to state and local governments. 201 Gas Tax Fund Gasoline sales tax allocations received from the State which are restricted to street -related expenditures. 202 Library and Museum Fund Revenues from property taxes and related expenditures for library and museum services. 203 Public Safety Fund General Fund Measure G sales tax revenue set aside for public safety expenditures. 210 Federal Assistance Fund Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) received from the federal government and the expenditures of those resources. 212 SLESF (COPS) Fund Supplemental Law Enforcement Services Funds (SLESF) received from the State for law enforcement activities. Also known as Citizen's Option for Public Safety (COPS). 215 Lighting & Landscaping Fund Special assessments levied on real property for city-wide lighting and landscape maintenance/improvements and the expenditures of those resources. 220 Quimby Fund Developer fees received under the provisions of the Quimby Act for park development and improvements. 221 AB939 Fund/Cal Recycle Franchise fees collected from the city waste hauler that are used to reduce waste sent to landfills through recycling efforts, Assembly Bill (AB) 939, 223 Measure A Fund County sales tax allocations which are restricted to street -related expenditures. 224 TUMF Fund Developer -paid Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) utilized for traffic projects in Riverside County. 225 Infrastructure Fund Developer fees for the acquisition, construction or improvement of the City's infrastructure as defined by Resolution 226 Emergency Mgmt. Performance Grant (EMPG) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. 227 State Homeland Security Programs (SHSP) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) grant for emergency preparedness. 230 CASP Fund, AB1379 / SB1186 Certified Access Specialist (CASp) program fees for ADA Accessibility Improvements; derived from Business License renewals. Assembly Bill AB 1379 and Senate Bill SB 1186. 231 Successor Agency PA 1 RORF Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 Redevelopment Obligation Retirement Fund (RORF) for Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) taxes received for debt service payments on recognized obligations of the former Redevelopment Agency (RDA). 235 SO Coast Air Quality Fund (AB2766, PM10) Contributions from the South Coast Air Quality Management District. Uses are limited to the reduction and control of airborne pollutants. Assembly Bill AB 2766. 237 Successor Agency PA 1 Admin Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 for administration of the Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ROPS associated with the former Redevelopment Agency (RDA). 241 Housing Authority Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housing. 243 RDA Low -Moderate Housing Fund Activities of the Housing Authority which is to promote and provide quality affordable housing. Accounts for RDA loan repayments 20 /o for Housing) and housing programs,. 244 Housing Grants Activites related Local Early Action Planning (LEAP) and SB2 grants for housing planning and development. 247 Economic Development Fund Proceeds from sale of City -owned land and transfers from General Fund for future economic development. 249 SA 2011 Low/Mod Bond Fund Successor Agency (SA) low/moderate housing fund; 2011 bonds refinanced in 2016. 250 Transportation DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - transportation related. 251 Parks & Rec. DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - parks and recreation. 252 Civic Center DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - Civic Center. 253 Library Development DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - library. 254 Community Center DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - community center. 255 Street Facility DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - streets. 256 Park Facility DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - parks. 257 Fire Protection DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - fire protection. 259 Maintenance Facilities DIF Fund Developer impact fees collected for specific public improvements - maintenance facilities. 270 Art In Public Places Fund Developer fees collected in lieu of art placement; utilized for acquisition, installation and maintenance of public artworks. 275 LQ Public Safety Officer Fund Annual transfer in from General Fund; distributed to public safety officers disabled or killed in the line of duty. 299 Interest Allocation Fund Interest earned on investments. 310 LQ Finance Authority Debt Service Fund Accounted for the debt service the Financing Authority's outstanding debt and any related reporting requirements. This bond was fully paid in October 2018. 401 Capital Improvement Program Fund Planning, design, and construction of various capital projects throughout the City. 405 SA PA 1 Capital Improvement Fund Successor Agency (SA) Project Area (PA) 1 bond proceeds restricted by the bond indenture covenants. Used for SilverRock infrastructure improvements. 501 Equipment Replacement Fund Internal Service Fund for vehicles, heavy equipment, and related facilities. 502 Information Technology Fund Internal Service Fund for computer hardware and software and phone systems. 503 Park Equipment & Facility Fund Internal Service Fund for park equipment and facilities. 504 Insurance Fund Internal Service Fund for city-wide insurance coverages. 601 SilverRock Resort Fund Enterprise Fund for activities of the city -owned golf course. 602 SilverRock Golf Reserve Fund Enterprise Fund for golf course reserves for capital improvements. 760 Supplemental Pension Plan PARS Account Su Iemental pension savings Ian for excess retiree benefits to general employees of the City. 761 Other Post Benefit Obligation Trust (OPEB) For retiree medical benefits and unfunded liabilities. 762 Pension Trust Benefit (PARS Account) For all pension -related benefits and unfunded liabilities. 113 Page 3 of 3 114 CONSENT CALENDAR ITEM NO. 8 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE DEMAND REGISTERS DATED NOVEMBER 14 AND 21, 2025 RECOMMENDATION Approve demand registers dated November 14 and 21, 2025. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY — None FISCAL IMPACT Demand of Cash: City Successor Agency of RDA Housing Authority BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS $ 4,815,602.96 $ 27,845.31 $ 4,843,448.27 Routine bills and payroll must be paid between Council meetings. Attachment 1 details the weekly demand registers for November 14 and 21, 2025. There was no check run on the week of November 28, 2025, due to the holiday. Warrants Issued 218423-218488 $ 718,772.71 EFT 308-309 $ 9,569.32 218490-218560 $ 1,560,316.53 EFT 310-313 $ 1,683.85 Voids $ (167,740.97) Wire Transfers $ 2,375,844.61 Payroll Tax Transfers $ 61,594.36 Payroll Direct Deposit $ 283,407.86 $ 4,843,448.27 'Check number 218489, payable to Southern California Gas Company, will be reported on a future Demand Register Report. Two checks were voided in response to a department request and a vendor request. Checks may be reissued as needed. 115 The most significant expenditures on the demand registers are: Vendor R.G General Engineering, Inc Granite Construction Company Desert Concepts Construction, Inca') Action Park Alliance, Inc. Paradise Chevrolet and Cadillac (1) Payments were made 11/14/25 & 11/21/25 Account Name Amount Purpose Construction $609,813.50 Fritz Burns Park Improvements Progress Payment Construction $388,400.50 Highway 111 Pavement Rehabilitation Progress Payment Various $288,034.25 Citywide Medians/Parks Repair and Maintenance X-Park Programming $111,364.25 X-Park Operations Services Vehicles Purchased $65,455.00 Purchase Chevrolet Silverado Utility Truck Wire Transfers: Seventeen transfers totaled $2,375,845. Of this amount, $1,905,243 was to SilverRock Phase 1 LLC for Debtor -in -Possession financing, and 278,657 was to Landmark. (See Attachment 2 for a complete listing). Investment Transactions: Full details of investment transactions, as well as total holdings, are reported quarterly in the Treasurer's Report. Transaction Issuer Type Par Value Maturity Federal National Mortgage Association Agency $ 500,000 Purchase Alphabet, Inc Corporate $1,000,000 Maturity United States Treasury Treasury Note $ 500,000 Prepared by: Jesse Batres, Finance Technician Approved by: Rosemary Hallick, Principal Management Analyst Attachments: 1. Demand Registers 2. Wire Transfers Settle Coupon Date Rate YTM 11/17/2025 0.560% 0.590% 11/26/2025 4.100% 3.840% 11 /30/2025 0.375% 0.720% 116 ATTACHMENT 1 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04372 - 11/14/2025 JB GEM of sAw DESM Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101-GENERAL FUND GHERA, EDWARD R 308 10/28-10/30/25 CALBO TRAINING TRAV... Travel & Training 101-6006-60320 75.00 ACTION PARK ALLIANCE, INC. 218423 10/01-12/31/25 - X PARK OPERATIONS ... X Park Programming 101-3003-60190 111,364.25 ALL STAR WATER HEATERS, I... 218424 REFUND DUPLICATE PAYMENT BPLB202... Over Payments, AR Policy 101-0000-20330 173.34 ALL STAR WATER HEATERS, I... 218424 REFUND DUPLICATE PAYMENT BPLB202... Credit Card Fees 101-6001-60122 1.95 ANAYA, JULIO C. 218425 10/26-10/28/25 CALBO TRAINING TRAV... Travel & Training 101-6006-60320 150.76 BECERRA BROTHERS ROOFI... 218427 REFUND OVERPAYMENT CREDIT CARD F... Credit Card Fees 101-6001-60122 7.98 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 218428 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 386.00 BIO-TOX LABORATORIES 218428 BLOOD ALCOHOL ANALYSIS Blood/Alcohol Testing 101-2001-60174 2,575.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/15/25 - SNACKS FOR D&D DIRECTOR ... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 35.98 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/15-10/16/25 - SNACKS FOR CJPIA TR... Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 327.63 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 09/2025-08/2025 - COSTCO MEMBERSH... Membership Dues 101-1007-60351 130.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 LQHS CAREER DAY SNACKS Community Engagement 101-3007-60137 166.71 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 FLUID TRANSFER PUMPS Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 539.60 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 FLUID TRANSFER PUMPS Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 516.26 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/13-10/16/25 - APWA PWI MODULE 4... Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 713.93 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 11/10/2025 - APWA LUNCH PW ADMIN Travel & Training 101-7001-60320 99.74 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 11/10/2025 - APWA LUNCH STREETS DE... Travel & Training 101-7003-60320 215.47 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 11/10/2025 - APWA LUNCH ENGINEERI... Travel & Training 101-7006-60320 99.74 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 OPERATING SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 97.18 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/08/25 PIZZA FOR LQYC MEETING Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 221.76 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 RIVCO HEALTH DEPART FALL FEST PERM... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 510.83 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 PODIUM FOR CS EVENTS Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 3,541.17 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 COVER FOR POOL LANE LINES Fritz Burns Pool Programming 101-3003-60184 204.34 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1004-60400 14.34 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1004-60400 62.82 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1004-60400 22.20 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 OFFICE SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-1004-60420 21.96 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 CH BULLETIN BOARD Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 665.67 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 MOUSE PADS Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 46.14 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 PLUSH MOUSEPAD Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 19.55 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-1005-60400 191.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 12/10-12/11 MUNICIPAL FINANCE INST.... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 500.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 12/10-12/11 MUNICIPAL FINANCE INST.... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 500.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 12/10-12/11 MUNICIPAL FINANCE INST.... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 500.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 2/24-2/27/26 - CSMFO CONFERENCE K.... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 625.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 2/24-2/27/26 - CSMFO CONFERENCE Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 900.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 2/24-2/27/26 - CSMFO CONFERENCE V.... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 625.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 2/24-2/27/26 - CSMFO CONFERENCE D.... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 625.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 MICROWAVE POLICE BREAK ROOM LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 203.05 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/23/25 - FOOD FOR NEIGHBORHOOD... LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 33.87 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 TOASTER FOR POLICE BREAK ROOM LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 54.58 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BINOCULARS FOR POLICE Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 714.48 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 FIRE PREVENTION WEEK SUPPLIES Volunteers - Fire 101-2002-60110 18.46 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 EMERGENCY PREP SUPPLIES TOOTHPAS... Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 74.93 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 THERMAL BLANKETS FOR EMERGENCY ... Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 182.67 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 FLASHLIGHTS FOR EMERGENCY PREP Disaster Prep Supplies 101-2002-60406 34.11 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 CUPS FOR WC Operating Supplies 101-3002-60420 192.29 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 TREELIGHTING EVENT SUPPLIES Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 1,113.54 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 CHRISTMAS LIGHTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,085.14 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 CHRISTMAS LIGHTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 311.99 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BATTERY FOR CANON Community Engagement 101-3007-60137 65.24 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/2025 - MAILCHIMP Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 240.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 11/2025 - APPLE MUSIC/STORAGE SUBS... Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 25.95 11/17/2025 3:41:27 PM Page 1 of 8 117 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04372 - 11/14/2025 JIB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 HVAC AIR DEFLECTOR FOR CH Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 19.92 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/26-10/30 CALBO TRAINING LODGING.., Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 420.32 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/26-10/30 CALBO TRAINING LODGING.., Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 464.32 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/26-10/30 CALBO TRAINING LODGING.., Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 369.17 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/26-10/30 CALBO TRAINING LODGING.., Travel & Training 101-6003-60320 420.32 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/17/25 - LUNCH FOR CODE TRAINING Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 218.94 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 FOOD FOR THE GREAT SHAKEOUT Travel & Training 101-6005-60320 67.86 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 OFFICE SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 50.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/29/25 ADMIN TECH FINANCE INTERV... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 103.39 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 ASSOCIATE PLANNER INTERVIEW PANEL... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 191.18 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/15/25 CJPIA TRAINING LUNCH Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 523.93 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 FY 25/26 SAFETY WORK BOOTS T.TUVELL Safety Gear 101-6003-60427 185.91 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 FY 25/26 SAFETY WORK BOOTS J.ANAYA Safety Gear 101-6003-60427 220.06 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 PLANTS - ALL COLOR GROWERS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,211.94 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/1/25 MSA TRAINING D.EASTLICK Travel & Training 101-7003-60320 300.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 IPAD HOLDER Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 44.56 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 NOCO JUMP STARTER Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 321.86 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BATTERY CHARGER Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 402.32 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 POTTERY Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 1,033.12 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 LQ PARK RETAINING WALL BLOCKS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 279.77 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 LEAGUE OF CITIES LUNCH G.VILLALPAN... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 56.12 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/8-10/10 LEAGUE CONF LODGING G.V... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 532.28 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 D&D DIRECTOR INTERVIEW PANEL LUN... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 94.38 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/8-10/10 LEAGUE CONF LODGING C.... Travel & Training 101-1006-60320 612.28 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 PROMO STICKERS Promotional Items 101-3007-60134 200.64 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 LUGGAGE TAGS FOR STATE OF THE CITY Community Engagement 101-3007-60137 2,373.48 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/22/25 - VISIT CA REGISTRATION M.G... Travel & Training 101-3007-60320 849.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/22/25-03/09/26 WORK MANAGEME... Membership Dues 101-3007-60351 164.58 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 REFUND CJPIA EVENT LODGING J.PENA Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 -299.97 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/7 RIVCO EDU EVENT MCGARREY FIT... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 90.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/07/25 COUNCIL MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 211.88 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/8-10/10 LEAGUE CONF LODG.MCGA... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 1,805.98 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 11/20 HIDDEN HARVEST LUNCHEON S.S... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 160.74 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 12/2 RIVCO EDU EVENT MCGARREY FIT... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 90.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/28/25 GPS HOSPITALITY EVENT Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 1,248.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 CAL CITIES RIVCO DIVISION MEETING D... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 65.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 12/07 ANIMAL SAMARITANS LUNCHEON.. Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 250.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 11/14 CHAMBER BREAKFAST EVANS, SA... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 70.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/15/25 FUNDRAISER LUNCH EVAN, 5... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 250.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/21/25 COUNCIL MEETING DINNER Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 148.23 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/12-10/18/25 CITY BUSINESS CAR RE... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 390.42 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/12-10/18/25 CITY BUSINESS LODGIN... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 1,054.90 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/13/25 - TOLLROAD LEAGUE CONF J.... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 7.52 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/8-10/10 LEAGUE CONF LODGING M... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 614.66 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/125 CITY BUSINESS TRAVEL MEALS/P... Travel & Training 101-1002-60320 398.63 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 PEACE OFFICER & PUBLIC SAFETY LUNG.. LQ Police Volunteers 101-2001-60109 950.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 PEACE OFFICER & PUBLIC SAFETY LUNG.. Sponsorships/Advertising 101-3007-60450 950.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 CMCA LEGISLATIVE EDUCATION WORKS... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 125.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 IIMC ATHENIAN DIALOGUE N.MORALES Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 100.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 12/1/25 LEAGUE WEBINAR RODRIGUEZ ... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 75.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 SMALL CLAIMS MINUTE ORDER JUDGE... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 1.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 IIMC DUES MOJICA RADEVA RODRIGUEZ... Membership Dues 101-1005-60351 640.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 OFFICE SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 400.93 CALIFORNIA WATERSCAPE 218435 SRR LAKE FOUNTAIN PUMP REPLACEM... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 3,988.00 CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS 218436 11/2025 - STVR HOTLINE Professional Services 101-6004-60103 648.00 CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS.. 218437 10/24-11/23/25 - FS #93 CABLE (4001) Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2002-61400 120.02 COACHELLA VALLEY POWER ... 218438 FY 25/26 CVPA MEMBERSHIP DUES Membership Dues 101-1002-60351 166,666.00 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE 218440 8/1/25-7/31/26 - SPORTS COMPLEX SN... Annual Permits/Inspections 101-3008-60196 340.00 CRIME SCENE CLEANERS 218441 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT CLEAN UP LA252830... Special Enforcement Funds 101-2001-60175 1,000.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTIR 218443 10/08-10/10/25 - LQ PARK LANDSCAPE ... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 3,240.00 11/17/2025 3:41:27 PM Page 2 of 8 118 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04372 - 11/14/2025 JIB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTIR 218443 10/7-10/10/25 CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS I... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 5,760.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTIR 218443 10/03/25 - LQ PARK LANDSCAPE RESTO... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 720.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTIR 218443 10/07/25 - CIVIC CENTER CAMPUS TREE... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 1,150.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTIR 218443 10/22-10/24/25 - LQ PARK LANDSCAPE ... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 3,240.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTIR 218443 10/13-10/14/25 - LQ PARK LANDSCAPE ... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 2,160.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTIR 218443 SRR LAKE EQUIPMENT ROOM ELECTRIC... Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 8,860.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTIR 218443 EISENHOWER PARK TUBE SLIDE Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 5,980.00 DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 218444 EXIT SIGN FOR FS #93 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 318.40 FIRSTLINE ENVIRONMENTAL... 218447 EMERGENCY STORM DRAIN HAZMATCL... Street Cleaning/Accidents 101-7003-60120 10,467.79 FLORES, CHERI 218448 10/14/25 PC MEETING REFRESHMENTS ... Operating Supplies 101-6001-60420 26.73 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 218449 10/26-11/25/25 - POLICE INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 101-2001-61400 535.68 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 218449 10/28-11/27/25 - SPORTS COMPLEX PH... Telephone - Utilities 101-3005-61300 56.41 FUSON, JACOB 218450 10/28-10/30/25 CALBO TRAINING TRAY... Travel & Training 101-6006-60320 96.05 GARDAWORLD 218451 11/2025 - ARMORED SERVICES Professional Services 101-1006-60103 330.56 JNS MEDIA SPECIALISTS 218454 10/2025 - MEDIA SERVICES Marketing & Tourism Promot... 101-3007-60461 32,309.94 KILEY & ASSOCIATES 218457 10/2025 - FEDERAL LOBBYIST SERVICES Contract Services - Administr... 101-1002-60101 3,500.00 MCGARREY, DEBORAH 218458 10/8-10/10/25 CA LEAGUE CONF TRAVE... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 322.52 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218459 10/30/25 PARKS UNIFORM SERVICES Uniforms 101-3005-60690 38.24 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218459 10/30/25 FACILITIES UNIFORM SERVICES Uniforms 101-3008-60690 22.94 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218459 CITY STAFF SHIRTS & JACKETS Operating Supplies 101-1005-60420 388.51 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218459 11/06/25 PARKS UNIFORM SERVICES Uniforms 101-3005-60690 37.90 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218459 11/06/25 FACILITIES UNIFORM SERVICES Uniforms 101-3008-60690 22.74 MOWERS PLUS INC 218460 BLOWERS & CHAINSAWS Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 2,406.49 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 218461 LQ PARK SPLASH PAD CHLORINATOR IN... LQ Park Water Feature 101-3005-60554 395.08 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 218463 10/15/25 - CH HVAC REPAIRS HVAC 101-3008-60667 378.00 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 218464 VETERANS DAY TEE SHIRTS Promotional Items 101-3007-60134 3,105.97 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 218464 TUBE DISPLAYS AND ROLL UP BANNERS ... Promotional Items 101-3007-60134 3,596.73 PENA, JOHN 218466 10/8-10/10/25 CA LEAGUE CONF TRAVE... Travel & Training 101-1001-60320 578.25 PITCHFORD. ROB 218467 REFUND OVERPAYMENT CREDIT CARD F... Credit Card Fees 101-6001-60122 11.45 PYE BARKER 218468 CH ALARM SERVICE CALL Security & Alarm 101-3008-60123 38.07 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC. 218469 POSTAGE FOR QUADIENT MACHINE LAT... Postage 101-1007-60470 84.92 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF ... 218472 09/25-10/24/25 - MOTOR FUEL CHARGES Sheriff- Other 101-2001-60176 1,365.81 RIVERSIDE RUBBER STAMP &... 218473 VOID CHECK STAMP Office Supplies 101-1006-60400 27.11 ROTOLIGHTNG, INC 218474 WELLNESS CENTER PALM TREE LIGHTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 5,029.27 SANCHEZ, TOMMI 218476 10/23/25 - INTRO TO LAND USE PLANNI... Travel & Training 101-6006-60320 43.54 SMART & FINAL 218477 SNACKS FOR D&D RECRUITMENT Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 39.05 SMART & FINAL 218477 10/15-10/16/25 CJPIA SAFETY TRAINING... Travel & Training 101-1004-60320 106.19 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 218479 10/23-11/22/25 - EOC PHONE SERVICE Telephone - Utilities 101-2002-61300 222.06 TUVELL, TAYLOR FLOYD 218481 10/26-10/28/25 - CALBO TRAINING REI... Travel & Training 101-6006-60320 60.26 US BANK 218482 07/01-09/30/25 - CUSTODY SERVICE FEE Administration 101-1006-60102 3,750.00 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 218483 FB PARK RESTROOM REPAIRS Maintenance/Services 101-3008-60691 680.00 USA-FACT,INC. 218484 10/2025 - PRE -EMPLOYMENT BACKGRO... Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 56.75 VERIZON WIRELESS 218485 09/26-10/25/25 - LQPD CELLS (6852) Telephone - Utilities 101-2001-61300 889.29 VINTAGE E & S INC 218486 WC PALM TREE LIGHTING POWER Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 1,508.96 VISIT GREATER PALM SPRINGS 218487 Q1 FY25/26 STVR TBID COLLECTIONS TBID Due to VGPS 101-0000-20303 48,460.04 VISIT GREATER PALM SPRINGS 218487 Q1 FY25/26 STVR TBID COLLECTIONS VGPS TBID Admin Fee 101-0000-43635 -2,423.00 XPRESS GRAPHICS 218488 MEDIA RELEASE SIGNAGE FOR EVENTS Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 216.91 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 476,326.80 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 COSTCO LINE END STENCIL Paint/Legends 201-7003-60433 30.45 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218459 10/30/25 STREETS UNIFORM SERVICES Uniforms 201-7003-60690 68.84 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218459 11/06/25 STREETS UNIFORM SERVICES Uniforms 201-7003-60690 68.22 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218459 UNIFORMS Uniforms 201-7003-60690 316.34 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total: 483.85 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 218463 LIBRARY HVAC REPAIRS HVAC 202-3004-60667 3,323.00 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 3,323.00 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND ARMSTRONG GARDEN CENT... 218426 PLANTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 179.19 11/17/2025 3:41:27 PM Page 3 of 8 119 Demand Register Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Packet: APPKT04372 - 11/14/2025 JB Account Name Account Number Amount BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 SOLAR SPOT LIGHTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 404.34 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 PLANTS - ALL COLOR GROWERS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 1,817.44 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 PLANTS - ALL COLOR GROWERS Travel & Training 215-7004-60320 2,374.32 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/01/25 - MSA TRAINING R.SEVILLA Travel & Training 215-7004-60320 150.00 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 PLANTS - ALL COLOR GROWERS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 532.72 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 218443 10/6-10/10/25 WASHINGTON PARKWAY.. Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 7,200.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 218443 9/29-10/2/25 WASHINGTON PARKWAY ... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 5,040.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 218443 10/13-10/17/25 WASHINGTON PARKW... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 7,200.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 218443 10/20-10/24/25 WASHINGTON PARKW... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 6,840.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 218443 10/27-10/31/25 WASHINGTON PARKW... Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 5,400.00 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUC... 218446 IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 126.46 HORIZON LIGHTING 218453 10/2025 - L&L LIGHTING MAINTENANCE Consultants 215-7004-60104 6,827.08 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 218480 LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING GROUND COV... Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 2,434.78 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 218480 LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING GROUND COV... Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 2,437.68 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 48,964.01 Fund: 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND CONNOISSEUR MEDIA HOLD... 218439 10/2025 - RECYCLING DIGITAL ADS AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 1,500.00 CONNOISSEUR MEDIA HOLD... 218439 10/2025 - RECYCLING RADIO ADS MIX 1... AB 939 Recycling Solutions 221-0000-60127 3,500.00 Fund 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND Total: 5,000.00 Fund: 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 DIVISION OF THE STATE ARC... 218445 07/01-09/30/25 - SIB 1186 FEES 10% QU... Contributions to State Agency 230-0000-60480 454.40 Fund 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 Total: 454.40 Fund: 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 NOTARY OATH & BOND L.MCGINLEY Travel & Training 241-9101-60320 77.63 CAHA, BECKY 218434 10/2025 - HOUSING CONSULTANT SERV... Professional Services 241-9101-60103 9,712.50 Fund 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY Total: 9,790.13 Fund: 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 9/29/25 - SNACKS FOR MARKETING ME... Marketing & Tourism Promot... 247-0000-60461 55.96 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 10/28/25 FOOD FOR ED MARKETING VI... Marketing & Tourism Promot... 247-0000-60461 135.37 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 03/29/26 - ED SPONSORSHIP Marketing & Tourism Promot... 247-0000-60461 2,125.00 Fund 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND Total: 2,316.33 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 NOI SWRCB APPLICATION FEES Construction 401-0000-60188 746.99 JSL ARCHITECTURE, INC. 218455 M&O YARD DESIGN Design 401-0000-60185 27,899.82 JTB SUPPLY CO., INC. 218456 TYPE A REPLACEMENT PANEL Construction 401-0000-60188 778.63 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & R... 218478 AVE 50 WIDENING IMPROVEMENTS Design 401-0000-60185 243.75 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & R... 218478 VILLAGE ART PLAZA PROMENADE & CUL... Design 401-0000-60185 5,982.50 Fund 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 35,651.69 Fund: 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT WEX BANK 309 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 DANIEL'S TIRE SERVICE, INC. 218442 HILARIO, BENJAMIN 218452 PACIFIC PRODUCTS AND SER... 218462 PARADISE CHEVROLET AND ... 218465 S&D CARWASH MANAGEME... 218475 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 09/26-10/25/25 - FUEL FORD AXLE REPAIR 23 CHEVY BOLT VI IN P4191664 TIRES VEHICLE WASHES VEHICLE DOOR MAGNETS 2024 CHEVY 2500 SILVERADO VIN #F35... 10/2025 - CAR WASH MEMBERSHIP Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 Vehicles, Purchased 501-0000-71031 Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 Fund 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: CANON SCANNER FOR CLERKS OFFICE (... Copiers 10/2025 - EMAIL PROTECTION SOFTWA... Software Licenses 11/2025 MOBILE SERVICE MANAGEME... Software Licenses PRINTER FOR G.DUCHENE Office Supplies IT SUPPLIES FOR STOCK Operating Supplies 3 WIRELESS HEADSETS FOR HR DEPT Operating Supplies 10/2025 - HULU SUBSCRIPTION Cable/Internet - Utilities UBIQUITI SFP TO RJ45 FOR IT WIFI PROJ... Machinery & Equipment MAGIC KEYBORAD FOR IT STOCK Operating Supplies 10/20/25 WORKING LUNCH WITH BURR... Operating Supplies 502-0000-60662 502-0000-60301 502-0000-60301 502-0000-60400 502-0000-60420 502-0000-60420 502-0000-61400 502-0000-80100 502-0000-60420 502-0000-60420 9,494.32 227.62 179.47 460.00 443.36 65,455.00 779.61 77,039.38 7,003.50 499.00 400.00 160.10 1,488.75 170.67 94.99 527.34 355.56 157.62 11/17/2025 3:41:27 PM 120 Page 4 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04372 - 11/14/2025 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 PROJECTOR FOR LOBBY HUB Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 4,942.86 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 CH LOBBY TV REPLACEMENTS Machinery & Equipment 502-0000-80100 686.20 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 218449 10/25-11/24/25 - CH INTERNET Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 127.98 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 218449 10/27-11/26/25 - BLACKHAWK/LQ PARK... Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 127.48 RATEGAIN ADARA INC 218470 FY25/26 ADARA CREDIT CARD REPORTS Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 37,500.00 RINCON CONSULTANTS, INC. 218471 10/2025 GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION 5... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 9,339.00 TPX COMMUNICATIONS 218479 10/23-11/22/25 - PHONE SERVICE Telephone - Utilities 502-0000-61300 4,052.60 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 67,633.65 Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 FIRST AID SUPPLIES MOBILE/FLEET Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 163.19 BMO FINANCIAL GROUP 218429 11/3/-11/5/25 CJPIA TRAINING LODGIN... Travel & Training 504-1010-60320 298.43 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total: 461.62 Fund: 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT GARDAWORLD 218451 11/2025 - SRR ARMORED SERVICES Bank Fees 601-0000-60455 724.35 GARDAWORLD 218451 10/2025 - SRR ARMORED SVCS TIER PRIC.. Bank Fees 601-0000-60455 172.82 Fund 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 897.17 Grand Total: 728,342.03 11/17/2025 3:41:27 PM 121 Page 5 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04372 - 11/14/2025 JB Fund Summary Fund 101-GENERAL FUND 201 - GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 221 - AB 939 - CALRECYCLE FUND 230 - CASp FUND, AB 1379 241 - HOUSING AUTHORITY 247 - ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 504 - INSURANCE FUND 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Account Number 101-0000-20303 101-0000-20330 101-0000-43635 101-1001-60320 101-1002-60101 101-1002-60320 101-1002-60351 101-1004-60129 101-1004-60320 101-1004-60400 101-1004-60420 101-1005-60320 101-1005-60351 101-1005-60400 101-1005-60420 101-1006-60102 101-1006-60103 101-1006-60320 101-1006-60400 101-1007-60351 101-1007-60470 101-2001-60109 101-2001-60174 101-2001-60175 101-2001-60176 101-2001-61300 101-2001-61400 101-2002-60110 101-2002-60406 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61300 101-2002-61400 101-3002-60420 101-3003-60149 101-3003-60184 101-3003-60190 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60554 101-3005-60690 101-3005-60691 101-3005-61300 101-3007-60134 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name TBID Due to VGPS Over Payments, AR Policy VGPS TBID Admin Fee Travel & Training Contract Services - Admi... Travel & Training Membership Dues Recruiting/Pre-Employm... Travel & Training Office Supplies Operating Supplies Travel & Training Membership Dues Office Supplies Operating Supplies Administration Professional Services Travel & Training Office Supplies Membership Dues Postage LQ Police Volunteers Blood/Alcohol Testing Special Enforcement Fu... Sheriff - Other Telephone - Utilities Cable/Internet - Utilities Volunteers - Fire Disaster Prep Supplies Maintenance/Services Telephone - Utilities Cable/Internet - Utilities Operating Supplies Community Experiences Fritz Burns Pool Progra... X Park Programming Materials/Supplies LQ Park Water Feature Uniforms Maintenance/Services Telephone - Utilities Promotional Items Expense Amount 476,326.80 483.85 3,323.00 48,964.01 5,000.00 454.40 9,790.13 2,316.33 35,651.69 77,039.38 67,633.65 461.62 897.17 728,342.03 Expense Amount 48,460.04 173.34 -2,423.00 4,990.63 3,500.00 3,054.53 166,666.00 520.73 957.75 99.36 21.96 301.00 640.00 922.36 388.51 3,750.00 330.56 4,887.28 27.11 130.00 84.92 1,241.50 2,961.00 1,714.48 1,365.81 889.29 535.68 18.46 291.71 858.00 222.06 120.02 289.47 5,604.21 204.34 111,364.25 12,939.23 395.08 76.14 32,618.96 56.41 6,903.34 11/17/2025 3:41:27 PM 122 Page 6 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04372 - 11/14/2025 JB Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-3007-60137 Community Engagement 2,605.43 101-3007-60320 Travel & Training 849.00 101-3007-60351 Membership Dues 430.53 101-3007-60450 Sponsorships/Advertising 950.00 101-3007-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pr... 32,309.94 101-3008-60123 Security & Alarm 38.07 101-3008-60196 Annual Perm its/Inspecti... 340.00 101-3008-60431 Materials/Supplies 19.92 101-3008-60432 Tools/Equipment 516.26 101-3008-60667 HVAC 378.00 101-3008-60690 Uniforms 45.68 101-3008-60691 Maintenance/Services 680.00 101-6001-60122 Credit Card Fees 21.38 101-6001-60420 Operating Supplies 26.73 101-6003-60320 Travel & Training 1,674.13 101-6003-60427 Safety Gear 405.97 101-6004-60103 Professional Services 648.00 101-6004-60320 Travel & Training 218.94 101-6005-60320 Travel & Training 67.86 101-6006-60320 Travel & Training 425.61 101-7001-60320 Travel & Training 813.67 101-7003-60120 Street Cleaning/Accidents 10,467.79 101-7003-60320 Travel & Training 515.47 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 495.49 101-7003-60432 Tools/Equipment 3,130.67 101-7006-60320 Travel & Training 99.74 201-7003-60433 Paint/Legends 30.45 201-7003-60690 Uniforms 453.40 202-3004-60667 HVAC 3,323.00 215-7004-60104 Consultants 6,827.08 215-7004-60320 Travel & Training 2,524.32 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 7,932.61 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 31,680.00 221-0000-60127 AB 939 Recycling Solutio... 5,000.00 230-0000-60480 Contributions to State A... 454.40 241-9101-60103 Professional Services 9,712.50 241-9101-60320 Travel & Training 77.63 247-0000-60461 Marketing & Tourism Pr... 2,316.33 401-0000-60185 Design 34,126.07 401-0000-60188 Construction 1,525.62 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 9,494.32 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and ... 443.36 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 1,646.70 501-0000-71031 Vehicles, Purchased 65,455.00 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 47,738.00 502-0000-60400 Office Supplies 160.10 502-0000-60420 Operating Supplies 2,172.60 502-0000-60662 Copiers 7,003.50 502-0000-61300 Telephone - Utilities 4,052.60 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 350.45 502-0000-80100 Machinery & Equipment 6,156.40 504-1010-60320 Travel & Training 298.43 504-1010-60420 Operating Supplies 163.19 601-0000-60455 Bank Fees 897.17 Grand Total: 728,342.03 11/17/2025 3:41:27 PM 123 Page 7 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04372 - 11/14/2025 JB Project Account Key **None** 201804E 201805D 201901D 202102CT 202205D 202216E 202328B 202328E 202329E 202330B 202330E 202424E 202425E 2526TMICT CSA152E LQYCE STVRE TREEE VETSE XPARKE Project Account Summary Project Account Name **None** Landscape & Lighting Median Islan... Design Expense Design Expense Construction Expense Design Expense General PW Maint - Desert Concep.. DIR 20250603507 On -Call Services Citywide Landscape Maintenance ... Citywide Lighting Maintenance Srv... DIR 20250603458 On -Call Services Park Landscape Maintenance Servi... Pool & Water Feature Maintenance On -Call Electrical Services Construction Expense CSA 152 Expenses La Quinta Youth Collective Expens... Short Term Vacation Rental Expen... Tree Lighting Ceremony Expense Veterans Day Ceremony Expense X Park Expenses Grand Total: Project Name **None** Landscape & Lighting Median Isla Corporate Yard Admin Offices & i Village Art Plaza Promenade & Ct Fritz Burns Park Improvements Avenue 50 Widening Improveme General PW Maintenance - Desei Citywide Landscape Maintenance Citywide Landscape Maintenance Citywide Lighting Maintenance Si Park Landscape Maintenance Ser Park Landscape Maintenance Ser Pool & Water Feature Maintenar On -Call Electrical Services FY25/26 Traffic Maintenance Imr CSA 152 Project Tracking La Quinta Youth Collective Short Term Vacation Rental Tracl Tree Lighting Ceremony Veterans Day Ceremony X Park 728,342.03 Expense Amount 485,636.08 5,582.45 27,899.82 5,982.50 746.99 243.75 14,840.00 31,680.00 1,817.44 6,827.08 16,270.00 1,211.94 395.08 1,508.96 778.63 10,467.79 221.76 648.00 1,113.54 3,105.97 111,364.25 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 11/17/2025 3:41:27 PM 124 Page 8 of 8 Qaigr(v � GEM .f sAw DE,SM - Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Demand Register Packet: APPKT04381 - 11/21/2025 JB Account Name Account Number Amount Fund: 101-GENERAL FUND CISNEROS, JOSE 310 11/4-11/7/25 CMRTA CONF TRAVEL RE... Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 162.05 HUNTER, DOMINIQUE 311 11/4-11/7/25 CMRTA CONF TRAVEL RE... Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 250.55 RADEVA, MONIKA 312 11/11-11/14 LEAGUE SEMINAR REIMB ... Travel & Training 101-1005-60320 127.09 WOODS, COLE 313 10/27-10/30/25 CACEO CONF TRAVEL R... Travel & Training 101-6004-60320 1,144.16 AKJOHNSTON GROUP, LLC. 218490 VETERANS RECOGNITION CEREMONY-... Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 12,166.55 ALL PRO BEVERAGE INC 218491 LOBBY COFFEE MACHINE SUPPLIES Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 715.56 ANDERSON COMMUNICATI... 218492 11/2025 - PUBLIC SAFETY RADIO RENTA... Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 374.00 BAJA BOYZ TOWING 218495 POLICE TOW LA252670016 Sheriff - Other 101-2001-60176 1,005.00 BLOWNAWAY BY WILLIAM 218496 MAINTENANCE OF PARK BENCHES Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 2,800.00 CALIFORNIA BARRICADE, INC. 218497 11/2025 - CONSTRUCTION BARRICADES Contingency for Operations 101-1002-60510 864.00 CALIFORNIA DESERT NURSER... 218498 PLANTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 870.55 COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOC 0... 218502 02/28/25 - ARTS AND MUSIC LINE SHARE.. Contributions to Other Agenc.. 101-7006-60480 4,129.25 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE Water -Pioneer Park - Utilities 101-3005-61207 1,786.85 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-2002-61200 804.69 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE Water -Monticello Park- Utili... 101-3005-61201 3,966.74 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE Water -Fritz Burns Park - Utili... 101-3005-61204 315.72 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE Water -Seasons Park - Utilities 101-3005-61208 28.14 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE Water -Community Park - Util.. 101-3005-61209 656.63 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 101-3008-61200 691.18 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE Water -Desert Pride - Utilities 101-3005-61206 737.54 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE PM 10 - Dust Control 101-7006-60146 45.49 COHESITY, INC. 218504 08/2025 - DATA BACK UP FOR LASERFIC... Professional Services 101-1005-60103 1,169.25 COHESITY, INC. 218504 07/2025 - DATA BACKUP FOR LASERFIC... Professional Services 101-1005-60103 1,169.03 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE PUBL... 218505 10/2025 - RADIO MAINTENANCE Operating Supplies 101-2001-60420 243.52 CV PIPELINE CORP 218506 11/13/25 WASHINGTON & HARLAND IN... Maintenance/Services 101-7003-60691 3,545.00 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 218508 10/2025 - LQYC FINGERPRINTING Consultants/Employee Servic... 101-1004-60104 96.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 218509 11/2025 L & L LANDSCAPE MAINTENAN... Landscape Contract 101-2002-60112 5,125.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 218509 11/2025 PARKS LANDSCAPE MAINTENA... Landscape Contract 101-3005-60112 81,283.10 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 218509 FB PARK PICKLEBALL GATE REPAIR Maintenance/Services 101-3005-60691 6,400.00 DESERT RECREATION DISTRI... 218511 10/2025 - FB POOL OPERATIONS & PRO... Fritz Burns Pool Programming 101-3003-60184 18,224.04 DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCH... 218512 07/24-09/17/25 BP #2 & #3 SCHOOL RE... School Officer 101-2001-60168 25,627.56 FEDEX 218514 11/04/25 - OVERNIGHT MAIL Postage 101-1007-60470 9.13 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 218515 PLUMBING EQUIPMENT Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 405.78 FERGUSON ENTERPRISES, INC 218515 PLUMBING EQUIPMENT Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 66.56 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 218516 11/2025 - LQ PARK PHONE Telephone - Utilities 101-3005-61300 62.84 GARDAWORLD 218517 10/2025 - ARMORED SERVICES EXCESS ... Professional Services 101-1006-60103 8.21 GRAINGER 218518 RETURN STRAIGHT CHAINS Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 -1,953.40 GRAINGER 218518 STRAIGHT CHAINS, LOAD BINDERS, & ST... Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 2,869.87 GRAINGER 218518 STRAIGHT CHAINS Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 776.80 GREEN DESERT WHOLESALE ... 218520 PLANTS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 799.31 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 WALL PLATE & FLOODLIGHT FOR FS #32 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 85.89 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 TUBE LIGHTS FOR FS #32 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 97.92 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 TUBE LIGHTS FOR FS #93 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 280.58 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 FLOODLIGHT FOR FS #32 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 494.58 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 STAPLERS & STAPLES Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 326.73 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 CONCRETE BONDING ADHESIVE & RESU... Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 102.27 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 POTTING SOIL MIX Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 125.88 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 PEST CONTROL SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 18.14 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 88.02 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 NAIL PULLER Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 24.98 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 CLAMP SETS Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 52.10 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 PIPE TIES & CONCRETE SCREWS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 228.81 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 MATERIALS FOR WC Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 321.16 12/4/2025 1:16:47 PM Page 1 of 8 125 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04381 - 11/21/2025 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 BATTERIES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 140.38 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 COPPER TUBING CUTTER & SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 52.67 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 HEAT & AIR DEFLECTOR & WATER VALVE Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 32.16 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 CH EXIT SIGNS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 233.17 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 HARDWARE & SUPPLIES FOR WC Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 79.20 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 TOOLS FOR FF-005 Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 735.99 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 TOOLS & EQUIPMENT FOR FF-005 Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 1,138.38 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 TOOLS FOR FF-005 Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 892.50 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 TOOLS & EQUIPMENT FOR FF-005 Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 156.53 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 TOOLS FOR FF-005 Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 195.57 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 POWER TOOL COMBO KIT Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 216.41 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 OSCILLATING MULT-TOOL & POWER TO... Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 660.11 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 HARDWARE Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 37.92 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 GLOVES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 45.54 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 PAINT Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 89.11 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 MASONRY ANCHORS Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 69.35 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 PAINT SPRAYER & PAINT Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 213.84 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 INFLATOR, IMPACT WRENCHES & BATT... Tools/Equipment 101-7003-60432 748.15 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 218523 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Eisenhower Park- U... 101-3005-61113 25.91 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 218523 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity- Utilities 101-2002-61101 933.37 JERNIGANS SPORTING GOOD... 218524 FY 25/26 SAFETY BOOTS D.CLAYTON Safety Gear 101-6003-60427 188.13 JERNIGANS SPORTING GOOD... 218524 FY 25/26 SAFETY BOOTS T.WILSON Safety Gear 101-3008-60427 188.13 JERNIGANS SPORTING GOOD... 218524 FY 25/26 SAFETY BOOTS E.GHERA Safety Gear 101-6003-60427 184.84 LANCE, SOLL, & LUNGHARD L... 218525 2025 LEASE/SBITA MANAGED SERVICE Professional Services 101-1006-60103 120.00 LANCE, SOLL, & LUNGHARD L... 218525 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ASSESSMENT Professional Services 101-1006-60103 1,852.50 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 LQ PARK RETAINING WALL BLOCKS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 4,117.46 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 WRAPAROUND LIGHTS FOR FS #70 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 227.24 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 TUBE LIGHT BULBS FOR FS #70 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 131.28 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 WRAPAROUND LIGHTS FOR FS #70 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 227.24 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 WRAPAROUND LIGHTS FOR FS #70 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 510.63 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 WRAPAROUND LIGHTS FOR FS #70 Maintenance/Services 101-2002-60691 711.62 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 PLYWOOD & STRAPS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 30.71 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 HARDWARE Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 35.04 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 HARDWARE & DRILL BITS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 68.12 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 PEST CONTROL SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 27.83 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 HARDWARE Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 26.77 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 79.34 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 FENCE HARDWARE Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 93.70 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 DRILL BITS & SPRAY PAINT Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 101.13 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 PEST CONTROL SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 22.64 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 CONCRETE MIX Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 281.13 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 HEADLAMPS & GLOVES Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 137.34 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 AIR COMPRESSOR TOOLS Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 74.35 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 SMALL TOOLS Tools/Equipment 101-3005-60432 186.88 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 WALL TEXTURE Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 20.64 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 SUPPLIES FOR CH Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 186.83 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 CLEAR ACRYLIC SHEETS FOR CH Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 90.03 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 MINI FRIDGES & MICROWAVE FOR PW ... Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 493.83 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 LED PANEL LIGHTS Materials/Supplies 101-3008-60431 464.78 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 NUT DRIVERS Tools/Equipment 101-3008-60432 66.49 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 5-GAL BOTTLED WATER Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 98.67 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 M&O SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 210.55 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 STRIPING PAINT SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 270.25 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 218529 10/2025 CITYWIDE JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 101-3008-60115 15,833.98 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 218529 10/23/25 - LQ PARK EMERGENCY RESTR... Janitorial 101-3008-60115 375.00 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 218529 10/23/25 - 8 GALLONS OF FOAMING HA... Janitorial 101-3008-60115 197.00 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 218529 10/15/25 - CH EMERGENCY RESTROOM ... Janitorial 101-3008-60115 375.00 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218530 UNIFORMS SHIRTS T.WILSON Uniforms 101-3008-60690 170.23 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218530 11/13/25 PARKS UNIFORM SERVICES Uniforms 101-3005-60690 39.21 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218530 11/13/25 FACILITIES UNIFORM SERVICES Uniforms 101-3008-60690 31.36 12/4/2025 1:16:47 PM Page 2 of 8 126 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04381 - 11/21/2025 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount MOWERS PLUS INC 218531 GAS CANS Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 237.03 NI GOVERNMENT SERVICES I... 218532 10/2025 - SATELLITE PHONES Mobile/Cell Phones/Satellites 101-2002-61304 92.90 OCEAN SPRINGS TECH INC 218534 11/2025 - LQ PARK SPLASH PAD MAINT... LQ Park Water Feature 101-3005-60554 2,163.00 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 218535 09/2025 - CH WATER TREATMENT HVAC 101-3008-60667 125.00 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 218535 10/2025 - CH WATER TREATMENT HVAC 101-3008-60667 125.00 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 218536 CONCERT SERIES TEES Promotional Items 101-3007-60134 3,080.01 PALMS TO PINES PRINTING 218536 CAMP CHAIRS FOR PROMO ITEMS Promotional Items 101-3007-60134 8,901.46 PYE BARKER 218538 07/01-09/30/25 FS #32 & FS #93 FIRE A... Fire Station 101-2002-60670 652.95 PYE BARKER 218538 07/01-09/30/25 FACILITIES FIRE ALARM ... Security & Alarm 101-3008-60123 510.00 QUADIENT FINANCE USA, INC. 218539 10/21/25 CITYWIDE POSTAGE MACHINE... Postage 101-1007-60470 3,555.30 RASA/ERIC NELSON 218541 FTM 2025-0001 ONCALL MAP CHECKING.. Map/Plan Checking 101-7002-60183 4,683.00 ROAD SERVICES 218543 11/10/25 ON -CALL STREET SWEEPING 5... Maintenance/Services 101-7003-60691 1,560.00 ROAD SERVICES 218543 11/11/25 ON -CALL STREET SWEEPING 5... Maintenance/Services 101-7003-60691 1,560.00 ROAD SERVICES 218543 11/12/25 ON -CALL STREET SWEEPING 5... Maintenance/Services 101-7003-60691 1,365.00 SAVI CONSTRUCTION INC 218544 FY25/26 ON -CALL PW CONCRETE MAIN... Maintenance/Services 101-7003-60691 6,250.00 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 218545 IRRIGATION SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 641.26 SOUTHWEST BOULDER & ST... 218546 SAND FOR SAND BAGS Materials/Supplies 101-3005-60431 60.68 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 218547 BREAKROOM SUPPLIES Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 62.84 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 218547 OFFICE SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-6006-60420 84.78 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 218547 OFFICE SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-7003-60420 297.21 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 218547 OFFICE SUPPLIES Office Supplies 101-7001-60400 73.46 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 218547 BREAKROOM SUPPLIES Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 46.38 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 218547 BREAKROOM SUPPLIES Citywide Supplies 101-1007-60403 92.22 STAPLES ADVANTAGE 218547 OFFICE SUPPLIES Operating Supplies 101-6006-60420 69.12 SWRCB 218548 07/O1/25-06/30/26 PHASE 1 MSAANN... Professional Services 101-7002-60103 18,196.00 TERRA NOVA PLANNING & R... 218550 09/2025-10/2025 ONCALL PLANNING S... Professional Services 101-6002-60103 18,351.50 TOTAL CARE WORK INJURY C... 218553 10/10/25 - PRE -EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL Recruiting/Pre-Employment 101-1004-60129 90.00 TRULY NOLEN INC 218555 07/01/25-07/31/26 - FS #32 PEST CONT... Pest Control 101-2002-60116 877.80 TRULY NOLEN INC 218555 07/O1/25-07/31/26 - FS#32 RODENT C... Pest Control 101-2002-60116 661.20 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 218558 11/2025 SRR EVENT PARK LANDSCAPE ... Landscape Contract 101-3005-60112 14,535.85 XPRESS GRAPHICS 218560 BRAND BOOKS Printing 101-3007-60410 187.51 XPRESS GRAPHICS 218560 VETERAN HONOREES BANNERS Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 1,344.32 XPRESS GRAPHICS 218560 STATE OF THE CITY WELCOME PAMPHL... Community Special Events 101-1001-60137 166.49 XPRESS GRAPHICS 218560 TREE LIGHTING SIGNS Community Experiences 101-3003-60149 559.93 Fund 101- GENERAL FUND Total: 308,319.76 Fund: 201 - GAS TAX FUND HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 CONCRETE SUPPLIES Materials/Supplies 201-7003-60431 154.37 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 218523 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electricity- Utilities 201-7003-61101 43.28 JERNIGANS SPORTING GOOD... 218524 FY 25/26 SAFETY BOOTS J.PALAFOX Safety Gear 201-7003-60427 222.93 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 PAINTSUPPLIES Paint/Legends 201-7003-60433 75.91 MISSION LINEN SUPPLY 218530 11/13/25 STREETS UNIFORM SERVICES Uniforms 201-7003-60690 70.58 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 218552 PAINT Paint/Legends 201-7003-60433 220.76 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 218552 PAINTSUPPLIES Paint/Legends 201-7003-60433 441.53 TOPS' N BARRICADES INC 218552 PAINT Paint/Legends 201-7003-60433 570.94 Fund 201 - GAS TAX FUND Total: 1,800.30 Fund: 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 218501 LIBRARY FIRST AID SERVICES Operating Supplies 202-3004-60420 28.68 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 218501 MUSEUM FIRST AID SERVICES Operating Supplies 202-3006-60420 30.04 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE Water - Utilities 202-3006-61200 258.79 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 218509 11/2025 LIBRARY PARKS LANDSCAPE MA.. Landscape Contract 202-3004-60112 2,836.94 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTR... 218509 11/2025 MUSEUM PARKS LANDSCAPE ... Landscape Contract 202-3006-60112 1,773.25 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 218516 11/04-12/03/25 - LIBRARY DIA CIRCUIT Cable/Internet - Utilities 202-3004-61400 690.00 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 MATERIALS FOR LIBRARY Maintenance/Services 202-3004-60691 497.48 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 218529 10/2025 LIBRARY JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 202-3004-60115 3,264.32 MERCHANTS BUILDING MAI... 218529 10/2025 MUSEUM JANITORIAL SERVICES Janitorial 202-3006-60115 989.54 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 218535 09/2025 - LIBRARY WATER TREATMENT HVAC 202-3004-60667 125.00 PACIFIC WEST AIR CONDITIO... 218535 10/2025 - LIBRARY WATER TREATMENT HVAC 202-3004-60667 125.00 PYE BARKER 218538 07/1-09/30/25 LIBRARY FIRE ALARM SE... Security & Alarm 202-3004-60123 255.00 PYE BARKER 218538 07/01-09/30/25 MUSEUM FIRE ALARM ... Security & Alarm 202-3006-60123 255.00 12/4/2025 1:16:47 PM Page 3 of 8 127 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04381 - 11/21/2025 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount TRULY NOLEN INC 218555 08/01/25-08/31/26 - LIBRARY PEST CON... Pest Control 202-3004-60116 957.60 Fund 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND Total: 12,086.64 Fund: 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND ARMSTRONG GARDEN CENT... 218493 PLANTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 895.94 ARMSTRONG GARDEN CENT... 218493 PLANTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 120.67 ARMSTRONG GARDEN CENT... 218493 PLANTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 179.19 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 190.96 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER D.. 218503 WATER SERVICE Water - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61211 4,379.05 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTIR 218509 11/2025 L & L LANDSCAPE MAINTENAN... Landscape Contract 215-7004-60112 112,236.00 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTIR 218509 11/2025 VISTA CORTINA L & L LANDSCA... Landscape Contract 215-7004-60112 691.58 DESERT CONCEPTS CONSTIR 218509 11/2025 L &L PARKS LANDSCAPE MAINT... Landscape Contract 215-7004-60112 14,898.38 EWING IRRIGATION PRODUC... 218513 IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 384.30 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 218523 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 123.82 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 218523 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 54.06 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 218523 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Utilities 215-7004-61116 499.16 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 218523 ELECTRICITY SERVICE Electric - Medians - Utilities 215-7004-61117 137.63 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 158.69 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 PVC FITTINGS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 67.86 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 CABLE LOCK Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 35.08 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 PADLOCK & CABLE LOCK Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 68.33 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 CONSTRUCTION ADHESIVE Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 158.69 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 PVC PIPE Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 46.02 RED TERRA NURSERY, LLC 218542 LIGHTING & LANDSCAPE PLANT MATERI... Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 3,555.04 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 218545 IRRIGATION CONTROLLER Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 539.25 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 218545 HAND PUMP SPRAYER Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 110.93 SMITH PIPE & SUPPLY CO 218545 IRRIGATION PARTS Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 331.02 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 218554 LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING GROUND COV... Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 4,875.36 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 218554 LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING GROUND COV... Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 3,683.91 TRI-STATE MATERIALS INC 218554 LANDSCAPE & LIGHTING GROUND COV... Materials/Supplies 215-7004-60431 4,896.64 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 218558 11/2025 SRR PARK RETENTION BASIN L... Landscape Contract 215-7004-60112 5,257.23 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 218558 11/2025 SRR EVENT PARK L&L PERIMET... SilverRock Way Landscape 215-7004-60143 5,812.78 VINTAGE ASSOCIATES 218558 CITYWIDE WEED ABATEMENT Maintenance/Services 215-7004-60691 2,960.00 Fund 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND Total: 167,347.57 Fund: 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND BLOWNAWAY BY WILLIAM 218496 MAINTENANCE OF MEMORIAL PEDESTA... APP Maintenance & Display 270-0000-60683 2,100.00 Fund 270 - ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND Total: 2,100.00 Fund: 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS DESERT ELECTRIC SUPPLY 218510 DU RATED LUGS & AL/CU SS LUGS Construction 401-0000-60188 16.98 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION C... 218519 09/2025 HWY 111 PAVEMENT REHAB P... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -20,442.13 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION C... 218519 09/2025 HWY 111 PAVEMENT REHAB P... Construction 401-0000-60188 408,842.63 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 MARKERS, WD-40, & CLOTHS Construction 401-0000-60188 31.19 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 PRYBAR & SMALL TOOLS Construction 401-0000-60188 127.07 LANDMARK CONSULTANTS,... 218526 10/23-11/05/25 - FB PARK IMPROVEME... Technical 401-0000-60108 2,680.80 NV5 218533 09/2025 HWY 111 PARCEL 2 LLA 97-248 ... Technical 401-0000-60108 555.00 NV5 218533 09/2025 - CALLE TAMPICO STREET VAC... Technical 401-0000-60108 3,315.00 POWERSTRIDE BATTERY CO. 218537 PS-41D BATTERY Construction 401-0000-60188 240.91 R.G. GENERAL ENGINEERING,.. 218540 11/2025 FRTIZ BURNS PARK IMPROVEM... Retention Payable 401-0000-20600 -32,095.45 R.G. GENERAL ENGINEERING,.. 218540 11/2025 FRITZ BURNS PARK IMPROVEM... Construction 401-0000-60188 641,908.95 T.Y. LIN INTERNATIONAL 218549 9/1-10/31/25 DUNE PALMS RD BRIDGE... Construction 401-0000-60188 3,715.19 Fund 401- CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS Total: 1,008,896.14 Fund: 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT AUTOZONE 218494 DIESEL EXHAUST FLUID Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 26.36 AUTOZONE 218494 ANTIFREEZE Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 25.00 AUTOZONE 218494 VEHICLE CLEANING SUPPLIES Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 27.39 CHEVROLET CADILLAC 218500 2017 CHEVY SILVERADO 2500 VIN Z176... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 3,623.88 CHEVROLET CADILLAC 218500 2018 CHEVY SILVERADO 2500 VIN Z252... Fuel & Oil 501-0000-60674 125.82 DANIEL'S TIRE SERVICE, INC. 218507 2022 CHEVY SILVERADO C3500 MAINTE... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 343.49 DANIEL'S TIRE SERVICE, INC. 218507 2022 CHEVY SILVERADO C3500 MAINTE... Vehicle Repair & Maintenan... 501-0000-60676 136.77 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 TRAILER TIE DOWNS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 321.94 12/4/2025 1:16:47 PM Page 4 of 8 128 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04381 - 11/21/2025 JB Vendor Name Payment Number Description (Item) Account Name Account Number Amount THE LOCK SHOP, INC 218551 FLEET KEYS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 489.38 THE LOCK SHOP, INC 218551 FLEET KEYS Parts, Accessories, and Upfits 501-0000-60675 200.10 Fund 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT Total: 5,320.13 Fund: 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY C... 218499 5/30-10/26/25 CITY WIDE ZOOM PHON... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 1.00 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY C... 218499 07/01-10/26/26 CITY WIDE ZOOM PHO... Prepaid Expense 502-0000-13600 15,140.64 CARAHSOFT TECHNOLOGY C... 218499 10/27/25-06/30/26 CITY WIDE ZOOM P... Software Licenses 502-0000-60301 30,281.28 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 218516 11/03-12/02/25 - 2ND CITY INTERNET LI... Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 2,580.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 218516 11/04-12/03/25 - WC DIA CIRCUIT Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 690.00 FRONTIER COMMUNICATIO... 218516 11/04-12/03/25 - DSL SVC Cable/Internet - Utilities 502-0000-61400 713.93 VERIZON WIRELESS 218557 10/02-11/01/25 - CITY (PADS (5587) Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 1,173.72 VERIZON WIRELESS 218557 10/02-11/01/25 - CITY CELL SVC (5496) Cell/Mobile Phones 502-0000-61301 3,096.65 VISUAL EDGE IT, INC. 218559 8/12-11/11/25 PRINTER OVERAGE CHA... Copiers 502-0000-60662 27.26 VISUAL EDGE IT, INC. 218559 11/12/25-2/11/26 PRINTER MAINTENA... Copiers 502-0000-60662 125.29 Fund 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Total: 53,829.77 Fund: 504 - INSURANCE FUND CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 218501 LANDSCAPE MAINT FIRST AID SERVICES Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 88.54 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 218501 PW YARD FIRST AID SERVICES Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 34.95 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 218501 WC FIRST AID SERVICES Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 69.45 CINTAS FIRST AID & SAFETY 218501 CH FIRST AID SERVICES Operating Supplies 504-1010-60420 270.66 Fund 504 - INSURANCE FUND Total: 463.60 Fund: 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 FENCE CORNER POSTS & PIPE TIES Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 449.89 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 FENCE CORNER POSTS & PIPE TIES & SU... Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 238.47 HOME DEPOT CREDIT SERVIC... 218521 FENCE CORNER POSTS & PIPE TIES Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 444.47 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEME... 218527 BATTERIES Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 53.64 USA DRAIN AND PLUMBING... 218556 SRR LEAKING DRAIN REPAIR Repair & Maintenance 601-0000-60660 650.00 Fund 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Total: 1,836.47 Grand Total: 1,562,000.38 12/4/2025 1:16:47 PM 129 Page 5 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04381 - 11/21/2025 JB Fund Summary Fund 101-GENERAL FUND 201 - GAS TAX FUND 202 - LIBRARY & MUSEUM FUND 215 - LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND 270-ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUND 401 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAMS 501 - FACILITY & FLEET REPLACEMENT 502 - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 504-INSURANCE FUND 601 - SILVERROCK RESORT Account Number 101-1001-60137 101-1002-60510 101-1004-60104 101-1004-60129 101-1005-60103 101-1005-60320 101-1006-60103 101-1007-60403 101-1007-60470 101-2001-60168 101-2001-60176 101-2001-60420 101-2002-60112 101-2002-60116 101-2002-60670 101-2002-60691 101-2002-61101 101-2002-61200 101-2002-61304 101-3003-60149 101-3003-60184 101-3005-60112 101-3005-60431 101-3005-60432 101-3005-60554 101-3005-60690 101-3005-60691 101-3005-61113 101-3005-61201 101-3005-61204 101-3005-61206 101-3005-61207 101-3005-61208 101-3005-61209 101-3005-61300 101-3007-60134 101-3007-60410 101-3008-60115 101-3008-60123 101-3008-60427 101-3008-60431 101-3008-60432 101-3008-60667 101-3008-60690 101-3008-61200 Grand Total: Account Summary Account Name Community Special Even... Contingency for Operati... Consultants/Employee S... Recruiting/Pre-Employm... Professional Services Travel & Training Professional Services Citywide Supplies Postage School Officer Sheriff - Other Operating Supplies Landscape Contract Pest Control Fire Station Maintenance/Services Electricity - Utilities Water - Utilities Mobile/Cell Phones/Sate... Community Experiences Fritz Burns Pool Progra... Landscape Contract Materials/Supplies Tools/Equipment LQ Park Water Feature Uniforms Maintenance/Services Electric - Eisenhower Par... Water -Monticello Park -... Water -Fritz Burns Park Water -Desert Pride - Util.. Water -Pioneer Park - Uti.. Water -Seasons Park - Ut... Water -Community Park ... Telephone - Utilities Promotional Items Printing Janitorial Security & Alarm Safety Gear Materials/Supplies Tools/Equipment HVAC Uniforms Water - Utilities Expense Amount 308,319.76 1,800.30 12,086.64 167,347.57 2,100.00 1,008,896.14 5,320.13 53,829.77 463.60 1,836.47 1,562,000.38 Expense Amount 166.49 864.00 96.00 90.00 2,338.28 127.09 1,980.71 917.00 3,564.43 25,627.56 1,005.00 243.52 5,125.00 1,539.00 652.95 2,766.98 933.37 804.69 466.90 14,070.80 18,224.04 95,818.95 7,916.71 475.65 2,163.00 39.21 9,200.00 25.91 3,966.74 315.72 737.54 1,786.85 28.14 656.63 62.84 11,981.47 187.51 16,780.98 510.00 188.13 2,749.44 4,128.54 250.00 201.59 691.18 12/4/2025 1:16:47 PM 130 Page 6 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04381 - 11/21/2025 JB Account Summary Account Number Account Name Expense Amount 101-6002-60103 Professional Services 18,351.50 101-6003-60427 Safety Gear 372.97 101-6004-60320 Travel & Training 1,556.76 101-6006-60420 Operating Supplies 153.90 101-7001-60400 Office Supplies 73.46 101-7002-60103 Professional Services 18,196.00 101-7002-60183 Map/Plan Checking 4,683.00 101-7003-60420 Operating Supplies 3,048.90 101-7003-60432 Tools/Equipment 961.99 101-7003-60691 Maintenance/Services 14,280.00 101-7006-60146 PM 10 - Dust Control 45.49 101-7006-60480 Contributions to Other A... 4,129.25 201-7003-60427 Safety Gear 222.93 201-7003-60431 Materials/Supplies 154.37 201-7003-60433 Paint/Legends 1,309.14 201-7003-60690 Uniforms 70.58 201-7003-61101 Electricity -Utilities 43.28 202-3004-60112 Landscape Contract 2,836.94 202-3004-60115 Janitorial 3,264.32 202-3004-60116 Pest Control 957.60 202-3004-60123 Security & Alarm 255.00 202-3004-60420 Operating Supplies 28.68 202-3004-60667 HVAC 250.00 202-3004-60691 Maintenance/Services 497.48 202-3004-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 690.00 202-3006-60112 Landscape Contract 1,773.25 202-3006-60115 Janitorial 989.54 202-3006-60123 Security & Alarm 255.00 202-3006-60420 Operating Supplies 30.04 202-3006-61200 Water -Utilities 258.79 215-7004-60112 Landscape Contract 133,083.19 215-7004-60143 SilverRock Way Landsca... 5,812.78 215-7004-60431 Materials/Supplies 20,106.92 215-7004-60691 Maintenance/Services 2,960.00 215-7004-61116 Electric - Utilities 622.98 215-7004-61117 Electric - Medians - Utilit... 191.69 215-7004-61211 Water - Medians -Utiliti... 4,570.01 270-0000-60683 APP Maintenance & Disp... 2,100.00 401-0000-20600 Retention Payable -52,537.58 401-0000-60108 Technical 6,550.80 401-0000-60188 Construction 1,054,882.92 501-0000-60674 Fuel & Oil 125.82 501-0000-60675 Parts, Accessories, and ... 1,090.17 501-0000-60676 Vehicle Repair & Maint... 4,104.14 502-0000-13600 Prepaid Expense 15,140.64 502-0000-60301 Software Licenses 30,282.28 502-0000-60662 Copiers 152.55 502-0000-61301 Cell/Mobile Phones 4,270.37 502-0000-61400 Cable/Internet - Utilities 3,983.93 504-1010-60420 Operating Supplies 463.60 601-0000-60660 Repair & Maintenance 1,836.47 Grand Total: 1,562,000.38 Project Account Summary Project Account Key Project Account Name Project Name Expense Amount **None** **None** **None** 221,001.06 111205CT Construction Expense Dune Palms Bridge Imp/BRLKS-5z 3,715.19 201804E Landscape & Lighting Median Islan... Landscape & Lighting Median Isla 19,079.02 12/4/2025 1:16:47 PM 131 Page 7 of 8 Demand Register Packet: APPKT04381 - 11/21/2025 JB Project Account Key 202008CB 202102CT 202102RP 202102T 202216E 202225CT 202225T 20225RP 202328A 202328E 202330A 202330B 202330E 202331B 202331E 202409T 202422E 202424E 2526TMICT CONCERTE CSA152E LQYCE SRRE TREEE VETSE Project Account Summary Project Account Name Contribution Expense Construction Expense Retention Payable Technical Expense General PW Maint - Desert Concep.. Construction Expense Technical Expense Retention Payable DIR 20240538984 Regular Mainte... Citywide Landscape Maintenance ... DIR 20240538986 Regular Mainte... DIR 20250603458 On -Call Services Park Landscape Maintenance Servi... DIR 20250572444 On -Call Services SilverRock Landscape Maintenance.. Technical Expense On -Call Public Works Concrete Ma... Pool & Water Feature Maintenance Construction Expense Concert Expense CSA 152 Expenses La Quinta Youth Collective Expens... SilverRock Events Expense Tree Lighting Ceremony Expense Veterans Day Ceremony Expense Grand Total: Project Name Avenue 48 Art and Music Line Pr( Fritz Burns Park Improvements Fritz Burns Park Improvements Fritz Burns Park Improvements General PW Maintenance - Desei Highway 111 Rehabilitation Proje Highway 111 Rehabilitation Proje Highway 111 Rehabilitation Proje Citywide Landscape Maintenance Citywide Landscape Maintenance Park Landscape Maintenance Ser Park Landscape Maintenance Ser Park Landscape Maintenance Ser SilverRock Landscape Maintenan SilverRock Landscape Maintenan Bear Creek Trailhead Restrooms On -Call Public Works Concrete M Pool & Water Feature Maintenar FY25/26 Traffic Maintenance Imr Master Account for all SRR ConCe CSA 152 Project Tracking La Quinta Youth Collective SilverRock Events Tree Lighting Ceremony Veterans Day Ceremony 1,562,000.38 Expense Amount 4,129.25 641,908.95 -32,095.45 2,680.80 6,400.00 408,842.63 555.00 -20,442.13 118,052.58 539.25 100,791.67 125.88 1,669.86 2,960.00 25,605.86 3,315.00 6,250.00 2,163.00 416.15 3,080.01 26,226.00 96.00 864.00 559.93 13,510.87 *Project codes are generally used to track Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects, other large public works projects, developer deposits, or city-wide events. Normal operational expenditures are not project coded and, therefore, will report as "none" in this section. 12/4/2025 1:16:47 PM 132 Page 8 of 8 ATTACHMENT 2 City of La Quinta Bank Transactions 11/10/2025-11/28/2025 Wire Transaction Listed below are the wire transfers from 11 /10/2025-11 /28/2025. Wire Transfers: 11/10/2025 -WIRE TRANSFER - EXPERTPAY $48.46 11/12/2025 -WIRE TRANSFER - STERLING $1,426.45 11/13/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - SILVERROCK PHASE 1 LLC(1) $824,320.04 11/17/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - J&H ASSET PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC $44,433.74 11/20/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $6,644.08 11/20/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $16,095.31 11/20/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $37,939.74 11/21/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - EXPERT PAY $48.46 11/21/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER- LQCEA $583.00 11/21/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - MISSION SQUARE $7,074.88 11/21/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER- MISSION SQUARE $15,910.10 11/21/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - LANDMARK WIRE $278,656.63 11/24/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER- STERLING $1,426.45 11/24/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $6,639.99 11/24/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $15,754.87 11/24/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - CALPERS $37,919.32 11/28/2025 - WIRE TRANSFER - SILVERROCK PHASE 1 LLC(1) $1,080,923.09 TOTAL WIRE TRANSFERS OUT $2,375,844.61 (1) These funds represent a loan under the Debit -in -Possession (DIP) financing. This disbursement does not reflect the City financing of construction or development at SilverRock. 133 134 BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPOINT A MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE AS MAYOR PRO TEMPORE FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2026 RECOMMENDATION Appoint a member of the City Council to serve as Mayor Pro Tempore for calendar year 2026. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Mayor Pro Tempore is the presiding officer at all Council meetings and related functions and activities when the Mayor is absent. • The selection of Mayor Pro Tempore is governed by State law (Gov. Code § 36801) and the City's Rules of Procedure for Public Meetings (Resolution No. 2022-027). The laws require the Council to choose one of its members as Mayor Pro Tempore at the same meeting it declares the results of a general municipal election, or during odd -numbered years, at a regular meeting in the last calendar quarter. FISCAL IMPACT — None. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Council's Rules of Procedure prescribes that the selection of a Mayor Pro Tempore shall be by three (3) or more affirmative votes, and a failure to achieve such total of affirmative votes, shall be deemed a selection of the incumbent to remain in office. The Resolution also stipulates that a successor or replacement Mayor Pro Tempore may be chosen at any time by three (3) or more affirmative votes. The office has been held by the following officials in recent years. • 2020 — Mayor Pro Tern Pena • 2021 — Mayor Pro Tern Radi • 2022 — Mayor Pro Tern Fitzpatrick • 2023 — Mayor Pro Tern Sanchez • 2024 — Mayor Pro Tern Pena • 2025 — Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey ALTERNATIVES There are no alternatives to the recommended action. Prepared by: Olivia Rodriguez, Deputy City Clerk Approved by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk 135 136 City of La Quinta BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 2 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPOINT MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL TO SERVE ON VARIOUS OUTSIDE AGENCIES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2026 RECOMMENDATION Appoint members of the City Council as City representatives to serve on various local, regional, and state boards, commissions, and committees for calendar year 2026. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Each year, the Council selects Councilmembers to serve on various local, regional, and state boards, commissions, and committees. • Attachment 1 details the various outside agencies, their meeting schedules, and Council's current assignments per the 2025 appointed representatives and alternates, including current voluntary assignments. The agencies that offer stipends are identified with an asterisk (*). FISCAL IMPACT Attendance at some meetings requires City representatives to incur reimbursable travel costs that could include mileage, airfare, meals, and/or overnight hotel stays. Travel costs for the first half of 2026 are included in fiscal year (FY) 2025/26 Travel and Training budget (Account No. 101-1001-60320). For meetings scheduled in the latter half of 2026, the costs will be included in FY 2026/27 budget. Voluntary assignments do not qualify for reimbursable travel expenses by the City. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City is involved in various government boards, commissions, or committees relating to local, regional, and state affairs. The City Council may appoint one or more of its members to these agencies or may appoint a citizen to represent the City. When appointing a member of the Council, the Fair Political Practices Commission (FPPC) [FPPC Regulation 18702.5] allows an elected official to vote on his/her/their own appointment to another public agency's board, committee, or commission if the appropriate form [Form 806 — Agency Report of: Public Official Appointments] is posted disclosing any compensation received. This form is posted on the City's website and will be immediately updated following this meeting. If Council opts to select a citizen representative, the City Clerk will seek applicants for that position. 137 Enclosed Attachment 1 details Council's current assignments to the various outside agencies, including current voluntary assignments which are listed in green font as they do not require an appointment by the Council, however, all assignments are disclosed in accordance with FPPC guidelines as noted above. ALTERNATIVES The Council may opt to make new appointments to some or all positions; discontinue membership in one or more boards, commissions, or committees; and/or change membership on one or more boards, commissions, or committees to a citizen representative. Prepared by: Olivia Rodriguez, Deputy City Clerk Approved by: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Attachment: 1. Committee Appointment List 2025 138 2025 Assignments ATTACHMENT 1 APPOINTED DECEMBER 3, 2024 AGENCY 2025 MEETING SCHEDULE 2025 REPRESENTATIVES Art Purchase Committee — March 2025 Meet during Art Celebrations; Members: Com Servs. Com (2) Members; Art Purchase Committee — November 2025 (Feb 27 — Mar 3, 2025; Nov 2025 — TBD) Mar 2025 —Sanchez &McGarrey; Nov 2025 — Evans & Fitzpatrick Members (Jan): McGarrey & Fitzpatrick Community Service Grant Review Committee Three per year: Jan, May, & Sept Members (May): Evans & Sanchez Members (Sept): McGarrey & Pena Desert Sands Unified School District TBD Members: Mayor Evans & Councilmember 2x2 Committee [established June 2013] Sanchez Member: Councilmember Sanchez California Joint Powers Insurance Authority* Annual Board meeting in July Alternate: Monika Radeva and/or Claudia Martinez Coachella Valley Mosquito & Vector Control District 2nd Tuesday of each month at 6 pm Member: Councilmember Pena (CVMVCD)* Appointed 10/19/2021 to serve thru Dec 31, 2025 2"d Monday, every other month at 3 pm Member: Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy (CVMC)* (2025: Jan 13, Mar 10, May 12, Jul 14, Sept 8, Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick Nov 10 Members: Mayor Evans — Director; Coachella Valley Power Agency — Joint Powers Agreement TBD Councilmember Fitzpatrick — Alternate No Term limit Coachella Valley Unified School District TBD Members: Councilmembers Fitzpatrick & Pena 2x2 Committee [established 11/03/2015] Coachella Valley Water District Joint Policy Committee Meet every 3 months or as needed Member: Mayor Evans Alternate: Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey (rotating) College of the Desert 2x2 Committee TBD Members: Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey & Councilmember Fitzpatrick CVAG Conservation Commission* 2nd Thursday of each month at 10:30 am Member: Mayor Evans (2025: dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick CVAG Energy & Sustainability Resources Committee* 2nd Thursday of each month at 12 pm Member: Mayor Evans (2025: dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick CVAG Executive Committee* Last Monday of each month at 4:30 pm Member: Mayor Evans (2025: dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey (rotating) * Note: receives stipend 139 2025 Assignments APPOINTED DECEMBER 3, 2024 AGENCY 2025 MEETING SCHEDULE 2025 REPRESENTATIVES CVAG General Assembly Annual banquet — last Monday in June in Chair's Delegate: Mayor Evans Alternate: Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey city (June 30, 2025, at 6 pm) Members: All Councilmembers CVAG Homelessness Committee* 3rd Wednesday of each month at 10 am Member: Councilmember Pena (2025: dark Mar, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick CVAG Public Safety Committee* 2"d Monday of each month at 9 am Member: Councilmember Pena (2025: dark Mar, Apr, Jul, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Councilmember Sanchez CVAG Transportation Committee* 1st Monday of each month at 10 am Member: Councilmember Fitzpatrick (2025: dark March, July, Aug, Oct, Dec) Alternate: Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey Desert Recreation District TBD Members: Councilmember Fitzpatrick & Mayor 2x2 Committee [established Jan. 2017] Pro Tern McGarrey Economic Development Subcommittee Meet twice a month if needed; TBD and 4th Members: Mayor Evans & Councilmember [established May 20, 2014] Wednesday at 9 am Fitzpatrick Alternate Member: Councilmember Sanchez 1st quarter — Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey Greater CV Chamber of Commerce Councilmembers rotate — 3rd Thursday every 2"d quarter — Councilmember Sanchez Information Exchange Committee month at 8:30 am (dark in June, and July, and 31d quarter — Mayor Evans Dec.) 4th quarter — Councilmember Fitzpatrick Alternate — Councilmember Pena Iln (`nanholla Valley Energy Commission (GVEG) Disbanded by IID Board effective Jan 1, 2025 Iln Energy runs d-yisor„ GGmmi#too (EGAD) Disbanded by IID Board effective Jan 1, 2025 umoro' League of California Cities — Delegate for annual Annual conference(s) & General Assembly Member: Mayor Evans conference October 8-10, 20252025, in Long Beach, CA Alternate: Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey (rotating) League of California Cities — Environmental Quality Policy 3 meetings per year on Fridays at 10 am Member: Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey Committee (2025: Jan 24, March 28, & June 13) League of California Cities — Executive Committee Via ZOOM — 6 pm 2"d Monday of the month Member: Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey Riverside County Division (2025: Feb 10, April 14, June 9, Aug 11, Oct 13) League of California Cities — Public Safety Committee 3 meetings per year held on Fridays at 10 am (2025: Jan 23, March 27, & June 12) Member: Councilmember Sanchez * Note: receives stipend 140 2025 Assignments APPOINTED DECEMBER 3, 2024 AGENCY 2025 MEETING SCHEDULE 2025 REPRESENTATIVES Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) — California Quarterly meeting held on Friday at 10 am Association (2025: Jan 10, Apr & July (TBD), Oct — Annual Member: Councilmember Sanchez Conference) Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) — Riverside 4t" Thursday of each month at 9:30 am (dark Nov 2025?) Member: Councilmember Sanchez Palm Springs Air Museum Board Member Meeting Dates for 2026 — Jan. 28, March 25, May Member — Mayor Evans 27 (Full Board Retreat) Nov. 18 at 10:00 am Meeting Dates for 2026 — Feb. 25, April 22, June Palm Springs Air Museum Executive Committee 17, July 22, Aug. 26, Sept. 23, Oct. 21, Dec. 16 at Member — Mayor Evans 10:00 am Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission 2nd Thursday of each month at 9:30am Member: Councilmember Sanchez Riverside County Animal Campus Commission 1st Thursday, quarterly at 9:30 am Member: Councilmember Sanchez (2025: Feb 6, Apr 3, June 5, Aug 7, Oct 2, Dec 4) Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) As Needed Member: Councilmember Fitzpatrick Audit Ad Hoc Committee Appointed 2018 Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC) Member: Councilmember Fitzpatrick Coachella Valley San Gorgonio Pass Area Corridor Ad Hoc As Needed Appointed 2025 Committee Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC)* 2nd Wednesday of each month at 9:30 am Member: Councilmember Fitzpatrick [one rep appointed by every city] Alternate Member: Mayor Pro Tern McGarrey So. Calif. Association of Governments (SCAG) 1st Thursday of each month at 9:30 am (Dark in Member: Councilmember Sanchez Transportation Committee Jan, May, Aug) Annual Regional Conference & General Assembly Delegate: Councilmember Sanchez (due to So. Calif. Association of Governments (SCAG) — May 1-2, 2025 — Marriott Springs Resort — Palm appointment to SCAG Regional Council; otherwise Mayor elect) Desert Alternate Member: Mayor Evans So. Calif. Association of Governments (SCAG) Regional 1st Thursday of each month at 12:00 pm Member: Councilmember Sanchez Council (elected 3/11/2024) * Note: receives stipend 141 2025 Assignments APPOINTED DECEMBER 3, 2024 AGENCY 2025 MEETING SCHEDULE 2025 REPRESENTATIVES 4tn Wednesday of each month at 10 am — 1 pm Member: Councilmember Pena Sunline Transit Agency* noon (includes Committees) Alternate: Councilmember Fitzpatrick [dark Aug & Nov 2025] Tuesday's at 8:30 am at rotating locations Members: Mayor Evans Visit Greater Palm Springs Convention & Visitors Bureau* (2025: Jan 31, April 4, June 27, Sept 26, Dec 12; Alternate Member: Councilmember Sanchez dark in Feb, March, May, July, Aug, Oct.. Nov) * Note: receives stipend 142 City of La Quinta BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 3 CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: APPROVE RECIPIENTS OF THE PILLAR OF THE COMMUNITY AWARD RECOMMENDATION Approve recipients of the Pillar of the Community Award. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • La Quinta's Community Services Awards Program includes the Pillar of the Community Award (Pillar Award) (Attachment 1) which recognizes outstanding citizens for their contributions to the community. • Phil La Greca and Doug Hassett were nominated for the Pillar Award for their volunteerism and involvement with community organizations. • The Arts and Community Services Commission (ACSC) reviewed the award nominees and recommended Council approve Mr. La Greca and Mr. Hassett for the Pillar Award. FISCAL IMPACT The total cost for the Pillar Award plaque, commemorative pin, and engraving of recipient names on the Community Awards Acknowledgement Monument is approximately $500 for both. Funds are available in the Community Services Experiences and Events budget (Account No. 101-3003-60149). 3ACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Pillar Award recognizes individuals who have made significant and sustained contributions to the community through their Community Engagement and Leadership, Volunteer Efforts and Philanthropy, and/or Public Service. Award candidates must be a current or former La Quinta resident for a minimum of 3 years and must have dedicated a minimum of 3 years of service to the community. The following Pillar Award nominations were submitted to staff (Attachment 2): 143 Phil La Greca is nominated for the Pillar Award in recognition of his more than 2 decades of service to La Quinta and the Coachella Valley. As a La Quinta resident for over 20 years, he served on the Arts and Community Services Commission from 2019-2023, contributing to program evaluations, park improvements, and community recommendations. Phil has volunteered extensively with the La Quinta Art Celebration, is a Tourism Ambassador with Visit Greater Palm Springs, and has assisted fundraisers for Coachella Valley Horse Rescue. He is a former Little League coach and Army veteran, reflecting a lifelong commitment to mentoring and community engagement. Colleagues and event organizers describe him as warm, energetic, and always willing to help. Doug Hassett is nominated for the Pillar Award due to his more than 3 decades of dedicated civic involvement and service to La Quinta. A Cove resident since 1992, he has served on the Construction Board of Appeals, the Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control Board (including as President), and currently on the La Quinta Planning Commission, where he has held roles as Vice Chair and Chair. Since 2015, Doug has contributed to numerous City ceremonies and events by lending his musical talents to the Veterans Recognition Ceremony, 9/11 Vigil, Hunter Lopez Vigil, City Picnic, and Tree Lighting celebrations. He actively champions community improvements such as off-street parking at the top of the Cove and participation in the Measure G study committee. Nominators emphasize his loyalty, deep policy knowledge, and tireless presence at City meetings and workshops, reflecting a sustained commitment that exemplifies the intent of the City's highest community honor. The ACSC reviewed the nominations during its December 8, 2025, regular quarterly meeting and recommended approving both nominees. If approved by Council, the nominees will be presented with a plaque and commemorative pin during an upcoming Council meeting and have their names engraved on the Community Awards Acknowledgement Monument in Civic Center Park. ALTERNATIVES Council may choose not to approve the nominees. Prepared by: Michael Calderon, Senior Management Analyst Approved by: Christina Calderon, Community Services Deputy Director Attachments: 1. Community Awards Program Criteria 2. Nominee Information 144 ATTACHMENT 1 City of La Quinta Community Awards Program The City of La Quinta's community awards programs were developed to recognize the individuals who have made significant impacts in La Quinta through their acts of service, kindness, leadership, and dedication to serving the community. Citizens are encouraged to nominate individuals they feel are deserving of these awards based on the criteria listed below. Nominees are assessed and reviewed on a case -by -case basis and awarded at the discretion of City staff, Arts and Community Services Commission (ACSC), and/or City Council. The City of La Quinta reserves the right to approve or deny any and all awards nominees. W110) Oualifications: 1. Candidates must be or have been a resident of La Quinta for a minimum of three (3) years, including La Quinta residents who have passed away. 2. Candidates must have dedicated a minimum of three (3) years of service to the community of La Quinta in one or more of the following areas: • Community Engagement & Leadership - Taking part and/or leading efforts to improve the local community and address community issues. • Volunteer Efforts & Philanthropy - Donation of time or services to local organizations including nonprofits, charities, schools, animal shelters, senior centers, sports leagues, churches, and/or youth organizations. • Public service - Employment or involvement in public service fields including education, law enforcement, emergency services, healthcare, and/or local government. Recognition Process: • Nominations are accepted year-round. • SIA recipients are not automatically inducted as Pillars of the Community. • Candidates may have received prior recognition from the City in one or more of the following areas: - Distinguished Citizen Award - Community Services Award - Junior Inspiration/Youth Achievement Award • Nominees are vetted by City staff, recommended by ACSC, and approved by City Council. • Recipients are presented with an award and/or plaque during a special Pillars of the Community Ceremony in the Council Chambers. • Recipient names are permanently added to the perpetual plaque located in the City Hall lobby. • Recipient names are permanently added to the Pillar of the Community and Distinguished Citizen monument located in Civic Center Campus. • Recipients are acknowledged at the City Picnic, and/or additional City Events. • Recipients are featured on the City's social media and mentioned in The Gem community magazine. 0& O"a GEM ofthe DESERT — 145 Qualifications: 'I.Candidates must be five (5) to eighteen (18) years of age. 2. Candidates must be or have been a La Quinta resident or attended a La Quinta school (public, private, or homeschool) for a minimum of one(]) year. 3. Candidates must have contributed significantly to the community of La Quinta. Examples may include: • Academic Achievement - Accomplishments attained in an academic setting include outstanding test scores, research outcomes, scholarships, academic honors, and/or continued education. • Acts of Kindness or Service - Helping others, organizing fundraisers, planting trees, leading a community clean-up event, and/or any other acts of selfless service that positively impact the community. • Artistic Achievement - Accomplishments in the field of visual, literary, or performing arts including awards, scholarships, productions, and overall achievements in the arts. • Athletic Achievement - Accomplishments in the field of sports including outstanding athletic performance (team or individual), scholarships, and/or tournament/championship game performances. • Community Engagement & Leadership - Taking part and/or leading efforts to improve the local community and address community issues. Help to build self-esteem and be a good role model for their peers. • Volunteer Efforts - Donation of time or services to local organizations including nonprofits, charities, schools, animal shelters, senior centers, sports leagues, churches, and/or youth organizations. Recognition Process: • Nominations are accepted year-round. • Nominees are vetted by City staff, recommended by ACSC, and approved by City Council. • Recipients are presented with an award/certificate during a City Council meeting. To allow for instantaneous recognition, recipients will be honored at a Council meeting immediately following the ACSC meeting during which they were approved for the award. • Recipients are acknowledged at the City Picnic, and/or additional City Events. • Recipients are acknowledged on the City's social media. &aura — — GEM ofrhe DESERT — 146 Qualifications: 1. Candidates must be or have been a *resident of La Quinta for a minimum of one (1) year, including former residents who have passed away. • Individuals who do not currently live in La Quinta or have never been a La Quinta resident are considered eligible if they have volunteered, own a La Quinta-based business, or served La Quinta residents in some capacity for a minimum of three (3) years. Examples include: - Teachers who live in other Coachella Valley cities, but teach at La Quinta schools - Youth sports coaches who live in other Coachella Valley cities, but coach La Quinta teams - Business owners who live in other Coachella Valley cities, but own businesses in La Quinta 2. Candidates must have contributed to the community of La Quinta and/or Coachella Valley through their acts of service or involvement with community organizations, athletics, or the local art scene. Examples may include: • Volunteering or involvement with nonprofits, charities, schools, animal shelters, food banks, senior centers, etc. • Coaches, referees, professional/collegiate athletes, involvement with youth sports organizations, etc. • Painters, sculptors, performing artists, musicians, writers, etc. Recognition Process: • Nominations are accepted year-round. • Nominees are vetted by City staff, recommended by ACSC, and approved by City Council. • Recipients are presented with an award/plaque during a City Council meeting. • Recipients are acknowledged at the City Picnic, and/or additional City Events. • Recipients are acknowledged on the City's social media. • Recipient names are engraved on the Distinguished Citizen/Artists & Athletes monument in Civic Center Campus ,&Qatra — — GEM ofrhe DESERT — 147 Qualifications: 1. Candidates must be a current *resident of La Quinta for a minimum of one (I) year including former residents who have passed away. • *Individuals who do not currently live in La Quinta or have never been a La Quinta resident are considered eligible if they have volunteered, own a La Quinta-based business, or served La Quinta residents in some capacity for a minimum of three (3) years. Examples include: - Teachers who live in other Coachella Valley cities, but teach at La Quinta schools - Youth sports coaches who live in other Coachella Valley cities, but coach La Quinta teams - Business owners who live in other Coachella Valley cities, but own businesses in La Quinta 2. Candidates must have demonstrated acts of kindness or service to the community of La Quinta through their time, actions, talents, or dedication. Examples may include: • Leadership • Social Responsibility • Mentorship • Positive Change • Selfless Service to the Community 3. Candidates should serve as a role model for compassion and strive to make the community of La Quinta a better place. Recognition Process: • Nominations are accepted year-round. • Nominees are vetted by City staff, recommended by ACSC, and approved by City Council. • Recipients are presented with a certificate during a City Council meeting. • Recipients are acknowledged at the City Picnic, and/or additional City Events. • Recipients are acknowledged on the City's social media. &aura — — GEM of the DESERT — 148 ATTACHMENT 2 25 September 2025 Pillar of the Community Award Nominations for: Doug Hassett Phil La G reca Dear Christina & Michael, I am presenting you with Pillar of the Community Award Nominations for Doug and Phil because of the length of each of their service, dedications and volunteering. I feel that they should just go to the top of the awards chain because of the years of service with our City and continuing service. I hope you both will feel the same. Thank you, 149 PILLAR OF THE COMMUNITY AWARD PROGRAM The Pillar of the Community Award is the highest honor the La Quinta City Council awards to remarkable members of the community. This program is designed to honor individuals that have contributed significantly to the community of La Quinta and have received recognition for their efforts. Candidate Qualifications: 1. A candidate must be or have been a resident of La Quinta for a minimum of three (3) years. 2. A candidate must have contributed significantly to the community of La Quinta. 3. A candidate must have received recognition for their efforts on a local, state, national or international level. Nomirn Name: Telephi rnrtn• How has the candidate contributed significantly to the community of La Quinta? Please turn i complete Sally Shelton 8 September 2025 Michael Calderon, Management Analyst CSD City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Nomination for Phil La Greca. Dear Michael, Please find attached my nomination for Phil La Greca. Phil has been a staple in various capacities in the City of La Quinta. 1) Phil has volunteered for over 10 for the La Quinta Art Celebration as the Captain who coordinate the Golf Cart logistics servicing food vendors, volunteers, electricians, staff and security during Art Events.. responsibilities have included the following: a) Artists arriving were assisted with setting up their art pieces. b) Security use of carts. c) Food vendors received their needed items without a truck traveling within the event site. d) Confirmed those using carts were insured to do so. 2) Phil also served as a La Quinta Community Services Commissioner from 2019-2023. Phil was one of 5 members appointed by City Council. Where he participated in Community Services programs effectiveness, needs and being part of maintenance and updates of all Parks and recommendations on community issues. 3) Phil has a long list of other organizations in the Coachella Valley which he'd served and volunteered for over the years... a) California Naturalist from UC Riverside b) Certified Tourism Ambassador for Coachella Valley Visitors 151 Bureau. c) Coachella Valley Horse Rescue Missions Fund Raising - Shuttle Driver. d) Desert Adventures Guide with Red Jeep Tours. I am proud to have been able to serve with Phil on the ACSC as a Commissioner from 2018-2023 when his term ended. He was always in great spirits, full of smiles, energy, insights and inspiration. I'm proud and so thankful to have served and know him. Hopefully, he'll be recognized for a Pillar of the Community Award. Sincerely, 152 August 7, 2025 To Whom it May Concern: I am sending this Pillar recommendation on behalf of Phil La Greca, an extraordinary pillar of the community. Phil and I have served together as appointees on the Arts and Community Services Commission for several years, where we supported art projects, artists, and community events such as the Annual Picnic, Phil often travels La Quinta on his bike and he notices needed improvements and necessary fixes throughout the community. He then seeks out staff to ensure completion of various tasks. Phil and I have also served many years as volunteers at the La Quinta Art Celebration and during this time, as well, he has demonstrated leadership during the evening Artist Dinner by ensuring that everything runs smoothly. Phil is warm, affectionate and always shows a smile because he likes assisting others. He is very worthy of this stellar award. Sincerely, Sharrell Blakeley 153 LA QUINTA ARTCELEBRATION Experience Amazing Art! September 8, 2025 Sally Sheldon Arts & Community Services Commission City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Community Service Awards Dear Sally, Both as a resident of La Quinta and an employee of SCOPE Events, LLC , I am writing you to recommend Phil La Greca for the Community Service Award. Phil has been a resident of La Quinta for over 20 years and has diligently served as a Volunteer for La Quinta Arts Festival and La Quinta Art Celebration events every year. Whenever we have a new volunteer position, we always know that Phil will be up for the challenge and will embrace it. At the Spring 2025 event, we asked if he could take- over the dreaded task of Captain for Artist Labor for Hire. Although artists sign-up prior to the event, it doesn't mean they will be ready at their designated time slot to have our labor crew help them to set-up or tear -down. By the end of the first hour, the schedule is already in chaos. We needed an individual that was strong enough to stand-up to the artists when informing them that they had missed their time slot and now would have to wait, one that can handle stress and keep their sense of humor through 2 days of set-up and Sunday night tear -down, and earn the respect of the artists overall. Not only did Phil excel, but he is going to be the Captain for Labor once again in November! In addition throughout the show, Phil delivers boxed lunches to artists, is a bartender at the Artist Award Reception, and is always available when I need one more favor! But the Arts Celebrations are just a small display of Phil's talents. He also served 11 years as a Tourism Guide for Visit Greater Palm Springs Tourism, 15 years as a Guide for Desert Adventures, is a Certified Nationalist Graduate from Cal State Riverside. Before he moved to the desert, he was a Little League coach for 25 years in Orange County, and is an Army Veteran. Phil La Greca is an asset to our community and should be recognized for his years of dedication. Please honor this individual. Sincerely, Kathleen Hughes, Event Director 154 SCOPE Events, LLC PO Box 104, La Quinta, CA 92247 155 ATTACHMENT 3 25 September 2025 Pillar of the Community Award Nominations for: Doug Hassett Phil La Greca Dear Christina & Michael, am presenting you with Pillar of the Community Award Nominations for Doug and Phil because of the length of each of their service, dedications and volunteering. I feel that they should just go to the top of the awards chain because of the years of service with our City and continuing service. I hope you both will feel the same. Thank you, 156 PILLAR COMMUNITY AWARD PROGRAM The Pillar of the Community Award is the highest honor the La Quinta City Council awards to remarkable members of the community. This program is designed to honor individuals that have contributed significantly to -the community of La Quinta and have received recognition for their efforts. Candidate Qualifications: 1. A candidate must be or have been a resident of La Quinta for a minimum of three (3) years. 2. A candidate must have contributed significantly to the community of La Quinta. 3. A candidate must have received recognition for their efforts on a local, state, national or international level. Nom Nam Telex candidate significantly to the of La Quinta? ?ase turn over ani complete side 2 Sally Shelton 20 August 2025 Community Services Awards Program Community Award Nomination Attn: Michael Calderon City of La Quinta La Quinta, CA 92253 Nomination for Douglas (Doug) Hassett 1 am honored to nominate another amazing resident of La Quinta for one of our cities new community awards. Doug was one of three others here in La Quinta who were instrumental in encouraging and inspiring me to want and pursue volunteering and also a part of this great City of La Quinta. After watching years and years of Doug's dedication in freely volunteering his gifts of music and hours of participation on Boards and Commissions,) couldn't let it go unnoticed any longer. Doug's History ... Doug moved to the Desert in 1991, purchased a lot in the La Quinta Cove and completed construction of their home in 1992. He started occasionally attending City Council meetings in 1996 during the construction of Tradition Golf Club, he found the process of running and governing a city to be fascinating and decided to serve. 158 June 2014 to June of 2015 he was appointed to the Construction and Appeals Board. In June of 2015 to June 2021 he was appointed to the Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control Board where he served as Member, Vice President and finally President. In June of 2021 he turned his interest to the LQ Planning Commission where he's still serving as an appointed Commissioner. He's served as Vice Chair over time and is currently serving as Chairman. Since 2015 to present he's been a Contributor for La Quinta's Veterans Day Ceremony singing our National Anthem, God Bless the USA to both honor and remember our La Quinta Service Members and says, he's truly been honored and privileged to do so. Starting in 2021 to present he's been honored to be a Contributor in the La Quinta 9/11 Vigil. He says, that all started when the city began the vigil. He was inspired while attending the first 9/11 Vigil the city started having. In 2021, he began singing "Amazing Grace" recognizing the First Responders who currently serve and remembering those who gave their all on 9/112001. You'll also find Doug at our City Birthday Celebrations, City Christmas Tree Lighting Ceremony and has been singing in honor of Cpl Hunter Lopez' Lightsaber Vigil and for the other brave service members who also lost their lives 26 August 2021 at the attack at Kabul airport. In approximately 2015 he presented the idea to the Cove Neighborhood association an idea for off street parking at the top of the cove. Thankfully, the city had the same idea and his vision became reality. He has hiked, biked and ran approximately 20,000 miles of our La Quinta roads and trails. Early mornings and weekends you'll most likely find him on one of our beautiful trails. In 2016 Doug participated on the Measure G study committee and proudly was one of the six signers in favor of the argument for Measure G. 159 if there is a work shop or study session... you'll find him there, proudly and happily participating. So it's easy to see why I find this nomination totally worthy. A small token of all Doug's hard work, dedication, commitment and love for all he's done and is doing. Thanks for your dedication and inspiration Doug. Si Sz 160 To Whom it May Concern - RE: Doug Hassett am sending this Pillar recommendation as a testament to a pillar of the community - La Quinta. have known Doug Hassett for close to 10 years. He is actually a neighbor of mine here in the Cove area of La Quinta. Doug has always impressed me with the attributes of loyalty, devotion, compassion and has a strong commitment to the community of La Quinta. A god neighbor to have! have seen him interact, support, and play roles in making this city a better place for its residents. Having served on commission and advisory boards, I see that Doug has what it takes to make a difference in the world. Especially, for the city of La Quinta. have been extremely impressed with his diverse knowledge on so many different topics ... and his unending energy to be part of creating something better! My vote goes to Doug for "Pillar of the community." Michele McDonough 161 162 BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 4 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO: (1) APPROPRIATE FUNDING FROM GENERAL FUND UNASSIGNED RESERVES, (2) APPROVE TRANSFER OF FUNDING FROM CITY TO THE LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY THROUGH A FINANCING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE FINANCING AUTHORITY FOR THE PURCHASE OF CERTAIN LONG LEAD-TIME POWER EQUIPMENT AND RESERVATION OF POWER CAPACITY, AND (3) APPROVE TWO AGREEMENTS WITH IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT RELATED TO THE AVENUE 58 SUBSTATION ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND PROCUREMENT OF CERTAIN POWER EQUIPMENT RECOMMENDATION Adopt Resolution to: A) Appropriate funding up to $10 million from General Fund Unassigned Reserves. B) Approve transfer of funding from City to the La Quinta Financing Authority through a Financing Agreement between the City and the Financing Authority for purposes of executing two agreements with Imperial Irrigation District and other stakeholders, for the purchase of certain long lead-time power equipment and reservation of power capacity; and authorize the City Manager to execute the Financing Agreement substantially in the form attached to this staff report, allowing for minor and non -substantive changes subject to review by the City Attorney. C) Approve (1) Engineering and Procurement Agreement (for certain long lead-time equipment to be paid by the City, subject to reimbursement thereof) and (2) Funding and Reservation of Capacity Agreement for Avenue 58 Transformer Bank Addition, with Imperial Irrigation District, Riverside County, and prospective developers for the Avenue 58 substation expansion to construct a fourth transformer bank; and authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements substantially in the forms attached to this staff report, to effectuate their respective purposes, allowing for minor and non -substantive changes subject to review by the City Attorney. EXECU i ivt SUMMARY • Since 2023, the City has been working with Imperial Irrigation District (IID) and private developers on a cost -share plan to expand electrical power capacity at the 163 Avenue 58 substation to accommodate projects in various stages of approval and/or construction, at an estimated cost of $23.25 million. • On November 18, 2025, IID Board of Directors unanimously approved two agreements regarding the Avenue 58 substation expansion: 1) Engineering and Procurement Agreement for the funding and procurement of certain engineering efforts and long lead-time power equipment to be paid for by the City, subject to reimbursement thereof; and 2) Funding and Reservation of Capacity Agreement for the Avenue 58 Transformer Bank Addition, which provides for the complete funding of the new facility by developers with the City and/or Riverside County (County) participating financially should there be a shortfall by private developers. • Staff recommends up to $10 million be appropriated for a loan to the Financing Authority for the Financing Authority to then effectuate the purchase of certain long lead-time power equipment, including a distribution transformer, breakers, switchgear, and a control house that can take up to 16 months to receive, and to provide a funding backstop in the event there is a shortfall by private developers for which the Financing Authority would be reimbursed pursuant to the terms of the agreements. The Financing Authority would be responsible for re -paying the loan to the City pursuant to the terms and conditions in the Financing Agreement. FISCAL IMPACT Staff recommends Council appropriate up to $10 million from General Fund Unassigned Reserves to be loaned by the City to the Financing Authority (Fund 310) for the procurement of certain long lead-time power equipment necessary for the Avenue 58 substation expansion. These funds would be reimbursed by developers upon commencement of their milestone payments in accordance with the Funding and Reservation of Capacity Agreement. BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS At the City's 2025 Community Workshop, La Quinta residents listed addressing the pending IID/Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) Agreement of Compromise that terminates on January 1, 2033, and equipment needs as their No. 1 priority. With electrical use rising due to new technology, building codes requiring additional electrification for new construction, and a shift toward electric vehicles, power substations in La Quinta and throughout the Coachella Valley are near capacity, which has stalled new and expanded development. IID's policy is that growth pays for growth, and it is appropriate for developers to pay their proportionate share for new, expanded or upgraded substations based on power capacity requirements for their individual projects. 164 Since 2023, the City has been working with IID and private developers on a cost -share plan to expand electrical power capacity at the Avenue 58 substation, located north of Avenue 58 and west of Monroe Street in La Quinta, to accommodate projects in various stages of approval and/or construction. On November 18, 2025, the IID Board of Directors unanimously approved two agreements listed below for the Avenue 58 substation electrical infrastructure improvements and procurement of certain power equipment, at an estimated cost of $23.25 million, which includes adding a fourth transformer bank and associated improvements that has the ability to serve 3,000 to 4,000 new homes: (1) Engineering and Procurement Agreement (for certain long lead-time equipment to be paid by the City, subject to reimbursement thereof), and (2) Funding and Reservation of Capacity Agreement for the Avenue 58 Transformer Bank Addition. IID would continue to own, maintain, and operate the substation. The two agreements with IID would ensure the cost for the substation expansion is shared between IID, the City, County, and the prospective developers' based on their proportionate power use. IID will contribute up to 20% of the costs associated with the Avenue 58 substation expansion. Developers will reserve capacity and contribute their proportional share based on their individual projects. The total contribution by developers is required to meet a minimum threshold of 50% of remaining costs after IID's contribution. Finally, if there is any remaining capacity after the developers' contribution, then the City and County will become the backstop and contribute the remainder at a 65% City and 35% County split, with expected reimbursements pursuant to the two agreements' terms. The long lead-time power equipment is projected to be received 14 to 16 months from purchase with construction of the fourth bank expected to start in 2027 and be completed in 2028. On December 3, 2025, staff provided a presentation to the Financial Advisory Commission (FAC) on the progress made in negotiating agreements between the City, IID, County, and interested developers. This was not an action item, but the FAC expressed support for the City's progress and plan for financing the project subject to developer reimbursement. The agreements approved by the IID Board of Directors contain the material terms relating to amount appropriated and purpose for use of the funds, but specific provisions relating to the City's funding approach by using the Financing Authority may be requested and agreeable to both IID and the County. Regardless, the preferred funding mechanism for the City, including for "bookkeeping" purposes and to account for immediate City disbursement and anticipated repayments to be well into the future, has integrated a Financing Agreement between the City and Financing Authority. 165 Because modifications to the respective agreements may be amenable to IID and the County, staff requests authorizing the City Manager, with the City Attorney's review, to revise the agreements in their forms attached to this staff report, to effectuate their respective purposes but in no event would the City Manager have authority to increase the appropriated amount or change the specified uses of these City funds without obtaining Council approval in advance. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect not to appropriate funds and not to approve any or all of these agreements, though staff does not recommend this alternative. Prepared by: Sherry Barkas, Communications Specialist Monika Radeva, City Clerk Claudia Martinez, Finance Director Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. Engineering and Procurement Agreement 2. Funding and Reservation of Capacity Agreement for Avenue 58 Transformer Bank Addition 3. Financing Agreement 166 RESOLUTION NO. 2025 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROPRIATING FUNDING, APPROVING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDING FROM THE CITY TO THE FINANCING AUTHORITY THROUGH A FINANCING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND FINANCING AUTHORITY, AND APPROVING TWO AGREEMENTS RELATED TO ELECTRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS AND PROCUREMENT OF CERTAIN POWER EQUIPMENT WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta ("City") has been working closely with Imperial Irrigation District ("IID"), Riverside County ("County"), and various developers to expand electrical capacity in the Coachella Valley; and WHEREAS, increasing population, new developments, electrical system reliability, aging infrastructure, capacity limitations, occasional power service outages, and enabling the timely implementation of electric power capital improvements are issues, among others, that have driven the need for Coachella Valley stakeholders to provide oversight on electrical service matters; and WHEREAS, addressing the growing electrical infrastructure needs in the Coachella Valley communities served by IID is an imperative priority for the City of La Quinta and the region; and WHEREAS, on March 18, 2025, the City Council at its regular meeting approved that certain Joint Powers Agreement ("JPA") for the formation and governance of a new joint exercise of powers agency, the Coachella Valley Power Agency ("CVPA"), an independent public agency formed and operating under the powers and obligations pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, California Government Code Section 6500 et seq., to authorize participating agencies to collectively address electrical infrastructure needs and related services; and WHEREAS, on April 1, 2025, the City Council at its regular meeting adopted Resolution No. 2025-007 authorizing La Quinta's membership in the CVPA; and WHEREAS, members of the CVPA have the ability to exercise powers to promote, develop, conduct, operate, and manage energy generation and distribution in the eastern Coachella Valley toward achieving reliable, cost-effective public power; and WHEREAS, the City Council seeks to strengthen system reliability and facilitate new growth and development opportunities within the City's boundaries and its sphere of influence through certain electrical infrastructure improvements for the existing IID 167 Resolution No. 2025 — XXX Electrical Infrastructure Improvements & Equipment Procurement Funding and Agreements Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 2 of 3 Avenue 58 Substation ("Project"), located north of Avenue 58 and west of Monroe Street in La Quinta; and WHEREAS, the City Council formed the La Quinta Financing Authority ("Authority") to assist the City in the financing, acquisition, construction, improvements, and operation of public facilities and infrastructure; and WHEREAS, the Authority is a joint powers authority duly created, established, and authorized to transact business and exercise its powers under and pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of the Government Code of the State of California (the "JPA Law"); and WHEREAS, the Authority, among other powers, is authorized by the JPA Law to make loans to local public agencies; and WHEREAS, on November 18, 2025, the IID Board of Directors approved two agreements (1) Engineering and Procurement Agreement (for certain long lead-time equipment to be paid by the City) and (2) Funding and Reservation of Capacity Agreement for Avenue 58 Transformer Bank Addition, for the Project, estimated at $23.2 million, which includes adding a fourth transformer bank; and WHEREAS, the City Council wishes to appropriate $10 million dollars from General Fund Unassigned Reserves for the aforementioned Project, and to approve the transfer of these funds to the Authority pursuant to a Financing Agreement for purposes of executing the two aforementioned agreements and providing funding, pursuant to the terms of the agreements, for the Project; and WHEREAS, the City Manager is hereby authorized to further negotiate and modify any of said agreements identified in this Resolution to effectuate their purpose, provided the material terms relating to the amount appropriated and purpose for use of the funds are not modified unless prior approval from the City Council is obtained; furthermore, the City Manager is hereby authorized to execute said agreements on behalf of the City Council; and to ensure the funding thereof. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct, and constitute the findings of the City Council, and are incorporated herein by this reference. SECTION 2. The City Council's adoption of this Resolution is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") pursuant to CEQA Guidelines [California Code of Regulations Section 15378(b)(4)] because the adoption of this Resolution is a fiscal activity which does not involve any commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially significant physical impact on the environment. .: Resolution No. 2025 — XXX Electrical Infrastructure Improvements & Equipment Procurement Funding and Agreements Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 3 of 3 SECTION 3. This Resolution shall go into effect upon adoption and the City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. SECTION 4. The City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized and directed to take such other and further actions, and execute such other and further documents, as are necessary and proper in order to implement this Resolution on behalf of the City Council. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 169 ATTACHMENT 1 ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT This ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is made and entered into this _ day of , by and between City of La Quinta, an incorporated city in the County of Riverside, State of California ("City") and Imperial Irrigation District, an irrigation and electric district organized and existing under the laws of the State of California, ("IID"). City and IID each may be referred to individually as a "Party," or collectively as the "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, for purposes of City's participation in and execution of this Agreement, California law has long recognized and authorized the production, generation, transmission, and furnishing of (among other utilities) electric power for use by the public. (See, e.g., Cal. Const., Art. XI, § 9(a) [municipal corporations may establish, purchase, and operate public works to furnish its inhabitants with (among other utilities) electric power]; id., Art. XII, § 3 [Public Utilities Commission may regulate private providers of electric power].) Likewise, California law has long recognized and authorized the ability for public agencies not only to charge users of electric power for improvements and services from that utility but also to use public funds in furtherance of providing electric power as a utility. (See, e.g., Independent Energy Producers Assn., Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization (2004) 125 Cal.AppAth 425, 443 [electric power facilities constructed with assistance of public funds].); WHEREAS, I ID is the electric service provider within a defined service territory area within Imperial County, California and portions of Riverside County, California ("District Service Area"); WHEREAS, City seeks to facilitate new growth and development opportunities within the City's boundary and sphere of influence, specifically those located within the general vicinity of IID'sAvenue 58 Substation ("Avenue 58 Facility"); WHEREAS, to facilitate new electrical service to the Developments, IID has evaluated the possibility of adding to the Avenue 58 Facility certain additional electrical distribution facilities namely the installation of one (1) new 50MVA transformer, ancillary substation equipment and new corresponding distribution line extensions (getaways' conduit system) up to the perimeter fence of the Avenue 58 Facility located immediately north of Avenue 58 in the City of La Quinta (collectively, the "New Facility"), a schematic representation of which is shown on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein; WHEREAS, the Avenue 58 Facility is designed and operated primarily to support IID's regional transmission network (commonly referred to as "BES") and offers limited physical space to accommodate the New Facility in a manner which would permit any future physical or legal separation of such New Facility from the Avenue 58 Facility such that IID may operate the Avenue 58 Facility separate and apart from the New Facility in compliance with its legal and regulatory obligations arising out of its operation of the BES within its Balancing Authority Area ("BAX); WHEREAS, IID, City and certain land developers with projects located within the vicinity of the Avenue 58 Facility (each, a "Developer" and collectively, the "Developers") are negotiating a final form of agreement concerning the Developers' collective funding of the New Facility and their respective rights to certain capacity therein once the New Facility is constructed as set forth in said agreement (the "Funding and Reservation Agreement"); 170 WHEREAS, because certain components of the New Facility require significant lead-time for manufacturing prior to delivery and installation, City has requested IID conduct the initial engineering and procurement of the long lead-time items necessary for the construction of the New Facility and to undertake those preliminary activities necessary for development of the New Facility; WHEREAS, City has agreed to advance funds, subject to reimbursement by Developers pursuant to the terms set forth in the Funding and Reservation Agreement; necessary for IID's procurement of the long lead-time items and preliminary engineering activities necessary for the development of the New Facility as set forth in this Agreement; WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that the New Facility will be owned, operated and maintained by IID as an integral part of the Avenue 58 Facility and which New Facility shall not be subject to any physical or legal separation therefrom the Avenue 58 Facility under any circumstances and that City shall not seek or otherwise advocate for in any proceeding, whether legislative or legal, for the legal or physical severance of the New Facility from the Avenue 58 Facility; and WHEREAS, the Parties wish to set forth their agreement with respect to the initial engineering and procurement as described above. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of and subject to the mutual covenants contained herein, including the foregoing which are part of this Agreement and not mere recitals, the Parties agree as follows: 1. Capitalized Terms. Unless specifically defined herein, capitalized terms shall have the meanings indicated in IID's Regulations or Developer Energy Planning Guide. 2. Authorization of Work. City authorizes IID to perform the preliminary engineering and procurement (the "Work") more specifically described in Attachment A. 3. Responsibilities of IID. IID shall: a. Perform the preliminary engineering activities described in Attachment A; b. Order and procure the long lead-time equipment necessary for the development of the New Facility, including a 50MVA Transformer, breakers, switches, relays and such other equipment or products as IID may determine in its sole discretion to be a risk of impacting schedule due to long lead-time, as the same are generally described in Attachment A. IID shall cause the procurement, design, including engineering, construction, operation, maintenance and repair of the New Facility to comply with all applicable federal, State and local laws, ordinances, rules, regulations, orders and policies relating to the New Facility ("Applicable Laws") and any applicable IID requirements, practices and standards, including all IID plans and specifications required for the procurement, design, engineering, construction, operation, maintenance and repair of the new Facility ("IID Plans and Specifications"); C. Own, operate and maintain, as part of its electrical system, at all times, in accordance with good utility practice, all portions of the New Facility, including all equipment, products and other materials necessary for the construction of the New Facility, including that which may be acquired pursuant to this Agreement; 171 d. Use all funds provided by the City under this Agreement only for the purchase of the equipment identified in Attachment A. Upon written request from the City, IID shall deliver within thirty (30) days to City an accounting for all Work completed or to be completed pursuant to this Agreement and for any funds received in connection with this Agreement, including line - items for payments made or services rendered. If any funds remain unspent after full performance by IID of its obligations under this Agreement, or are unable to be spent for any of the authorized purposes set forth in this Agreement (such as, for example, the equipment is no longer able to be delivered to IID for reasons outside of the control of any of the Parties to this Agreement), then IID shall return said unspent or unused funds to the City within thirty (30) days after either IID's full performance under this Agreement with funds still remaining, or any third party vendor or other independent person/entity notifies IID or City that said funds are no longer able to be used for the purpose(s) set forth in this Agreement; e. Expend the funds provided by City to IID, within ninety (90) days of the receipt of such funds by IID. Any funds not expended within ninety (90) days shall be returned to the City. 4. Responsibilities of the City. City shall: a. Pay, in advance, the estimated costs to be incurred by IID associated with the review and approval of activities identified in this Agreement, as specified in Attachment A. The amount of a deposit of such costs is attached hereto as Attachment B and is due to IID upon execution of this Agreement; and b. Cooperate with IID in meeting the obligations set forth in Section 3, including but not limited to, providing information to IID necessary for the development of the New Facility. 5. Failure of City to Meet Obligations under this Agreement. If City fails to meet its obligations under this Agreement, the following terms apply: a. IID may provide to City a notice to cure and correct. Thereafter, City shall have thirty (30) days within which to meet its obligation(s) as listed in the notice to cure and correct. If City fails to meet its obligation by the end of that thirty (30) day period, IID may cease all activities or efforts under this Agreement related to the Work, and may at its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement upon written termination notice, if City fails to adhere to its obligations as set forth herein. b. If for any reason City fails to make a payment to IID as required by this Agreement, IID will notify City of such failure. If City does not make the required payment within thirty (30) calendar days of the notice of failure to make timely payment, IID may, in its sole discretion, immediately terminate this Agreement and seek reimbursement of any deposit(s) then remitted by I I D to any service provider or equipment manufacturer with respect to the New Facility. To the extent IID is successful in obtaining any reimbursement of all or any portion of any deposit(s), IID may first apply therefrom said sums, in the following order: (1) to satisfy any outstanding financial sums owing under any contract to which IID has entered into pursuant to this Agreement to facilitate the development and construction of the New Facility; then (2) to satisfy any sums outstanding hereunder this Agreement owed to IID for any portion of the Work completed hereunder, including, for example, any engineering work or study, prior to such termination; and then, (3) to City. 6. Failure of IID to Meet Obligations under this Agreement. If IID fails to meet its obligations under this Agreement, the following terms apply: City may provide to IID a notice to cure and 172 correct. Thereafter, IID shall have thirty (30) days within which to meet its obligation(s) as listed in the notice to cure and correct. If IID fails to meet its obligation by the end of that thirty (30) day period, City may cease all activities or efforts under this Agreement and may, at its sole discretion, terminate this Agreement upon written termination notice, if IID: (i) fails to use any of the funds from the City for the purchase of the equipment identified in Attachment A and IID's review and approval of activities arising from the integration and use of the equipment identified in Attachment A, or (ii) fails to adhere to its obligations as set forth herein. 7. Intention to Execute Funding and Reservation Agreement; Intent of the Parties. IID and City intend to enter into the Funding and Reservation Agreement (together with Developers) with respect to the ultimate funding, construction, and operation of the New Facility. The Funding and Reservation Agreement will identify the totality of the facilities and costs necessary for the complete construction of the New Facility and any engineering, design, and procurement activities identified as necessary for the New Facility. The Funding and Reservation Agreement will also account for Work already undertaken and payments already made pursuant to this Agreement together with provisions for reimbursement to City by Developers. The Parties further acknowledge that the City, if the City is not reimbursed through the Funding and Reservation Agreement, intends to be reimbursed through a potential combination of means including: other potential negotiated agreement(s) with developers of future projects in City before those developers receive power; payment of a development impact fee to the City as a condition of regulatory approval for a future development project when the project receives power from the New Facility which is funded under this Agreement; or payment to the City pursuant to any other lawful means. Notwithstanding the foregoing, City and IID expect that City will be fully reimbursed for all payments made by City pursuant to this Agreement from the first milestone payment to be paid to IID by the Developers under the Funding and Reservation Agreement and that the foregoing mechanisms by which City may seek reimbursement shall be absolutely conditioned on the failure of City to be reimbursed in full for all payments made under this Agreement from the first milestone payment to be paid to IID by Developers under the Funding and Reservation Agreement. 8. IID Not Liable for Delays. In no event shall IID be responsible under the terms of this Agreement for any delay in completion of the Work, provided, however, IID will make all commercially reasonable efforts to avoid delay in completion of the Work. 9. Other Fees and Charges. Nothing in this Agreement compels any public entity to issue any permit, approval, or entitlement that otherwise must be applied for and processed in accordance with applicable laws and procedures, including any discretionary or ministerial permits. Nothing in this Agreement constitutes a waiver of any applicable fees, assessments, or taxes. 10. Termination of Agreement. Subject to Section 11 below, this Agreement shall terminate upon the earliest of the following to occur: (i) written notice provided by IID to City as permitted herein; or (ii) written notice provided by City to IID as permitted herein. 11. Survival of Obligation to Pay and Reconciliation. Except in the situation of IID's default, City's obligations to pay IID for costs incurred or committed to be incurred pursuant to this Agreement will survive termination of this Agreement for any reason except insofar as payment of such costs is provided for in the Funding and Reservation Agreement. 12. Ownership. City acknowledges and agrees that IID solely shall own the New Facility, including all appurtenant equipment, rights, and associated interests made, given, granted or 173 arising in connection therewith, including any manufacturer's warranties upon any of the foregoing, including any which may be acquired pursuant to this Agreement. In accordance with the recitals contained hereinabove, City acknowledges that at all times hereafter the date of this Agreement, the New Facility will be owned, operated and maintained by IID as an integral part of the Avenue 58 Facility and which New Facility shall not be subject to any physical or legal separation therefrom the Avenue 58 Facility under any circumstance and that City shall not seek or otherwise advocate for in any proceeding, whether legislative or legal, for the legal or physical severance of the New Facility from the Avenue 58 Facility. Upon completion of the New Facility, IID shall operate and maintain the New Facility as part of its electric system in accordance with good utility practice. City shall not acquire any ownership rights in the Avenue 58 Facility or the New Facility by virtue of this Agreement. 13. Indemnification. The City, nor its Council, officers, executives, directors, employees, contractors, agents or representatives thereof shall not be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission of IID under or in connection with the Work performed by IID under this Agreement. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, IID shall fully indemnify and hold City harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any act or omission of IID under or in connection with the Work performed by IID pursuant to this Agreement. Likewise, neither IID nor its Board, or any officer, executive, director, executive, employee, contractor, agent or representatives thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission of City under or in connection with this Agreement, and pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, City shall fully indemnify and hold IID harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any act or omission of City under or in connection with this Agreement. 14. Limitation of Liability; Release. IID's liability for any action arising out of its activities or non-performance relating to this Agreement shall be limited to the refund of amounts received hereunder. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHALL IID (OR ITS BOARD, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS ORAGENTS) BE LIABLE FORANY OF CITY'S ECONOMIC LOSSES, COSTS OR DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SPECIAL, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, PUNITIVE, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. 15. Disclaimer of Warranty. IID warrants that the work it performs hereunder, including the Work, shall be consistent with Good Utility Practice. IID DISCLAIMS ALL OTHER WARRANTIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT SERVICES SET FORTH IN THIS AGREEMENT, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND ALL SIMILAR WARRANTIES. 16. Representations, Warranties, and Covenants. Each Party makes the following representations, warranties and covenants: a. Good Standing. Such Party is duly organized, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the state in which it is organized, formed, or incorporated, as applicable; that it is qualified to do business in the state or states in which it is located, and that it has the corporate power and authority to own its properties, to carry on its business as now being conducted and to enter into this Agreement and carry out the transactions contemplated hereby and perform and carry out all covenants and obligations on its part to be performed under and pursuant to this Agreement. 174 b. Authority. Such Party has the right, power and authority to enter into this Agreement, to become a Party hereto and to perform its obligations hereunder. This Agreement is a legal, valid and binding obligation of such Party, enforceable against such Party in accordance with its terms, except as the enforceability thereof may be limited by applicable bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization or other similar laws affecting creditors' rights generally and by general equitable principles (regardless of whether enforceability is sought in a proceeding in equity or at law). C. No Conflict. The execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement does not violate or conflict with the organizational or formation documents, or bylaws or operating agreement, of any Party, or any judgment, license, permit, order, material agreement or instrument applicable to or binding upon such Party or any of its assets. d. Consent and Approval. The Parties have obtained each consent, approval, authorization, order, or acceptance by any Governmental Authority that is required of it in connection with the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement, including the City's City Council and IID's Board of Directors, and each will provide to any Governmental Authority notice of any actions under this Agreement that are required by Applicable Laws and Regulations. e. Compliance with Law. In performing their respective obligations under this Agreement, each Party shall comply with and conform to all applicable laws, rules, regulations and ordinances. 17. Force Maieure. The IID shall not be considered to be in default of the provisions of this Agreement if delays in or failure of performance shall be due to uncontrollable forces, the effect of which, by the exercise of reasonable diligence, the IID could not avoid. The term uncontrollable forces shall mean any event which results in the prevention or delay of performance by IID of its obligations under this Agreement and which is beyond the control of I ID. The term uncontrollable forces includes, but is not limited to, fire, acts of God, flood, earthquakes, storms, lightning, epidemic, war, riot, civil disturbance, sabotage, inability to procure permits, licenses, or authorizations from any state, local, or federal agency, or person for any of the supplies, materials, accesses, or services required to be provided by the IID under this Agreement, strikes, work slowdowns, or other labor disturbances, and judicial constraint. The provisions of this section shall not be interpreted or construed to require the IID to prevent, settle, or otherwise avoid a strike, work slowdown, or other labor action. The IID shall give timely notice, either in writing or via telephone, to the City describing the circumstances of uncontrollable forces that prevent the fulfillment of obligation of this Agreement. Telephone notices given pursuant to this section shall be confirmed in writing as soon as reasonably possible. The IID shall give timely written notice to the City that the uncontrollable forces that prevented the fulfillment of obligations of this Agreement are no longer present and work has resumed on those obligations. 18. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by, interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, as if executed and to be performed wholly within the State of California, and without regard to principles of conflicts of law. 19. Venue. Any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be brought in State court located in the County of San Diego, California and/or Federal court located in the County of San Diego. Each Party irrevocably agree to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in the State of California for the purpose of litigating any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement, and waive any defense of forum non conveniens (or a similar doctrine pertaining to venue). 175 20. Notices. a. Representatives and Addresses. All notices, requests, demands, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing, unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, and shall be delivered in person or sent by certified mail, postage prepaid, by overnight delivery, or by electronic mail or electronic facsimile transmission, and addressed as follows: When delivered to IID: Imperial Irrigation District Attention: General Manager 333 E. Barioni Boulevard (for hand -delivery) PO BOX 937 (for mailings) Imperial, CA 92251 (760) 339-9477 When delivered to City of La Quinta Attention: City Manager 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 777-7000 b. Changed Representatives and Addresses. Either Party may, from time to time, change its representative(s) or address for the purpose of notices to that Party by a similar notice specifying a new representative or address, but no such change shall be deemed to have been given until such notice is actually received by the Party being so notified. 21. Miscellaneous. a. Binding Effect. This Agreement and the rights and obligations hereof, shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the Parties hereto. b. Conflicts. In the event of a conflict between the body of this Agreement and any attachment, appendices or exhibits hereto, the terms and provisions of the body of this Agreement shall prevail and be deemed the final intent of the Parties. C. Rules of Interpretation. This Agreement, unless a clear contrary intention appears, shall be construed and interpreted as follows: (1) the singular number includes the plural number and vice versa; (2) reference to any person includes such person's successors and assigns but, in the case of a Party, only if such successors and assigns are permitted by this Agreement, and reference to a person in a particular capacity excludes such person in any other capacity or individually; (3) reference to any agreement (including this Agreement), document, instrument or tariff means such agreement, document, instrument, or tariff as amended or modified and in effect from time to time in accordance with the terms thereof and, if applicable, the terms hereof; (4) reference to any Applicable Laws and Regulations means such Applicable Laws and Regulations as amended, modified, codified, or reenacted, in whole or in part, and in effect from time to time, including, if applicable, rules and regulations promulgated thereunder; (5) unless expressly stated 176 otherwise, reference to any Attachment is to an Attachment to this Agreement; (6) "hereunder", "hereof', "herein", "hereto" and words of similar import shall be deemed references to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular Section or other provision hereof or thereof; (7) "including" (and with correlative meaning "include") means including without limiting the generality of any description preceding such term; and (8) relative to the determination of any period of time, "from" means "from and including", "to" means "to but excluding" and "through" means "through and including". Ambiguities or uncertainties in the wording of this Agreement shall not be construed for or against any Party, but shall be construed in the manner that most accurately reflects the Parties' intent as of the date they executed this Agreement. d. Entire Agreement; Incorporation of Recitals. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties with reference to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous understandings or agreements, oral or written, between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. There are no other agreements, representations, warranties, or covenants that constitute any part of the consideration for, or any condition to, either Party's compliance with its obligations under this Agreement. Each and every of the recitals set forth hereinabove are hereby incorporated herein this Agreement as is though set forth herein and contain integral terms and conditions of this Agreement. e. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement is not intended to and does not create rights, remedies, or benefits of any character whatsoever in favor of any persons, corporations, associations, or entities other than the Parties, and the obligations herein assumed are solely for the use and benefit of the Parties, their successors in interest and, where permitted, their assigns. f. Waiver. The failure of a Party to this Agreement to insist, on any occasion, upon strict performance of any provision of this Agreement will not be considered a waiver of any obligation, right, or duty of, or imposed upon, such Party. Any waiver at any time by either Party of its rights with respect to this Agreement shall not be deemed a continuing waiver or a waiver with respect to any other failure to comply with any other obligation, right, duty of this Agreement. Any waiver of this Agreement shall, if requested, be provided in writing. g. Headings. The descriptive headings of the various sections of this Agreement have been inserted for convenience of reference only and are of no significance in the interpretation or construction of this Agreement. h. Multiple Counterparts; Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which is deemed an original but all constitute one and the same instrument. The words "execution," "execute," "signed," "signature," and words of like import in or related to any document to be signed in connection with this Agreement shall be deemed to include electronic signatures or the keeping of records in electronic form, each of which shall be of the same legal effect, validity or enforceability as a manually executed signature or the use of a paper -based recordkeeping system, as the case may be, to the extent and as provided for in any applicable law. i. Amendment. The Parties may by mutual agreement amend this Agreement by a written instrument duly executed by the Parties. No amendment shall be effective if executed otherwise. j. No Partnership. This Agreement shall not be interpreted or construed to create an association, joint venture, agency relationship, or partnership between the Parties or to impose 177 any partnership obligation or partnership liability upon either Party. Neither Party shall have any right, power or authority to enter into any agreement or undertaking for, or act on behalf of, or to act as or be an agent or representative of, or to otherwise bind, the other Party. k. Severability. If any provision in this Agreement is finally determined to be invalid, void or unenforceable by any court or other Governmental Authority having jurisdiction, such determination shall not invalidate, void or make unenforceable any other provision, agreement or covenant of this Agreement. 22. Assignment. Neither Party shall assign this Agreement and any attempted assignment without the consent and approval of the other Party shall automatically be void. This Agreement shall be fully binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the Parties and their respective successors and assigns. 23. IID's Regulations and Developer Energy Planning Guide. This Agreement is subject to IID's Regulations and Developer Energy Planning Guide as may be amended from time -to -time. (Regulations: https://www.iid.com/power/rates-regulations/regulations ) (Developer Energy Planning Guide: https://www.iid.com/home/showpublisheddocument/14229/638808431962130000 ). [Signature page follows.] 178 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed by their duly authorized officers or agents on the day and year first above written. IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT By: Its: Date: CITY OF LAQUINTA By: Its: Date: 179 ATTACHMENT A ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT TO BE PERFORMED BY IID The "Work" under this Agreement shall consist of the following activities: 1) Develop preliminary engineering drawings necessary to facilitate construction and operation of the New Facility. 2) Order and procure the long lead-time items as follows: • 50MVA Transformer • Breakers • Switches • Control Room/Relays • Regulators • Such other equipment or products as IID may determine in its sole discretion to be a risk of impacting schedule due to long lead-time. [Detailed equipment list to be attached prior to execution.] 180 ATTACHMENT B REQUIRED DEPOSIT Deposit Amount: Dollars ($ ,000.00) to be updated 181 ATTACHMENT 2 FUNDING AND RESERVATION OF CAPACITY AGREEMENT for AVENUE 58 TRANSFORMER BANK ADDITION THIS FUNDING AND RESERVATION OF CAPACITY AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made this day of , by and between IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT, an irrigation district formed under the Water Code of the State of California ("IID"), the City of La Quinta, an incorporated city in the County of Riverside, State of California ("City"), the County of Riverside, a political subdivision of the State of California ("County") (each of City and County an "Agency" and collectively the "Agencies") and each of the developers listed on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (each a "Developer" and collectively, the "Developers"). IID, the City, County and the Developers are collectively referred to as the "Parties" or individually as a "Party"). Also, the City, County and each Developer who are Parties to this Agreement are also referred to as a "Participant" or the "Participants" to the extent they participate in this Agreement as to any reservation of capacity. WHEREAS, IID is the electrical service provider within a defined service territory area within Imperial County, California and portions of Riverside County, California ("District Service Area") and the City and each Developer seeks to induce IID to develop new electrical distribution service within the District Service Area to facilitate new growth and development as identified herein; WHEREAS, each Developer seeks to develop a separate piece of real property within the District Service Area (each a "Development" and collectively, the "Developments") and require electric service from IID; WHEREAS, IID owns, operates and maintains the Avenue 58 Substation ("Avenue 58 Facility"), and which facility is an integral part of IID's bulk electric system ("BES") and supports IID's regional transmission network and balancing authority area ("BAX); WHEREAS, to facilitate new electrical service to each Development, IID has evaluated the possibility of adding to the Avenue 58 Facility certain additional electrical distribution facilities namely the installation of one (1) new 50MVA transformer, ancillary substation equipment and new corresponding distribution line extensions (getaways) up to the perimeter fence of the Avenue 58 Facility located immediately north of Avenue 58 in the City of La Quinta (collectively, the "New Facility"), a schematic representation of which is shown on Exhibit "B", attached hereto and by reference incorporated herein; WHEREAS, the Avenue 58 Facility is designed and operated primarily to support IID's regional transmission network (commonly referred to as "BES") and offers limited physical space to accommodate the New Facility in a manner which would permit any future physical or legal separation of such New Facility from the Avenue 58 Facility such that IID may operate the Avenue 58 Facility separate and apart from the New Facility in compliance with its legal and regulatory obligations arising out of its operation of the BES within its Balancing Authority Area ("BAX); WHEREAS, the Parties acknowledge that at all times hereafter, the New Facility will be owned, operated and maintained by IID as an integral part of the Avenue 58 Facility and which New Facility shall not be subject to any physical or legal separation therefrom the Avenue 58 Facility under any circumstances and that no Party hereto this Agreement shall seek or otherwise advocate for in any proceeding, whether legislative or legal, for the legal or physical severance of the New Facility from the Avenue 58 Facility; Page 1 of 23 182 WHEREAS, the Parties intend hereby to set forth the framework for each Developer, at their cost and expense, to induce IID to (a) undertake and complete design and, engineering of the New Facility; (b) procure materials, supplies, and equipment for the New Facility; and, (c) fund, by advancing IID's reasonable and actual costs for engineering, development construction and commissioning of the New Facility ("Construction Costs"). A preliminary estimate of IID's Construction Costs is shown on Exhibit "C", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference; WHEREAS, New Facility, when constructed, will facilitate growth and development and is sufficient to mitigate impacts to the IID's distribution system directly caused by each Development and are necessitated by each Developments' electrical requirements; WHEREAS, because City will advance initial funding necessary for initial engineering and to procure the long -lead equipment necessary for the construction of the New Facility to accommodate Developments' electrical requirements, City is entitled to reimbursement from each Developer as set forth in this Agreement; and, WHEREAS, because the Developers are to collectively bear the expense for the New Facility necessary to serve their electrical service requirements by paying their proportional share of the cost thereof all as set forth herein, IID agrees that each Developer who is now or hereafter becomes a party to this Agreement should be entitled to a reservation of the capacity in the amounts, durations and upon the terms and conditions set forth herein. NOW THEREFORE IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: New Facility Requirements. The Parties agree that the New Facility is necessary to serve each Developers' respective electrical service needs and the New Facility, when constructed, will have the capacity necessary to facilitate growth and development and mitigate the impacts to IID's electric system directly caused by each Development and other anticipated electrical service needs as identified herein. The Parties further agree that due to the location of each Development, the New Facility is necessary to accommodate electric service thereto each Development and the corresponding electrical service needs. The Parties agree that the New Facility has been developed based upon information supplied by each Developer. Each Developer acknowledges and agree that they will be responsible for funding the cost of the New Facility as set forth in this Agreement. 2. CEQA Compliance. IID agrees that it will serve as the lead agency with respect to the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") in connection with the New Facility and, that following the Parties full and complete execution of this Agreement, will undertake all necessary studies and analyses necessary or prudent to ensure appropriate compliance with CEQA. All cost and expense associated with the foregoing, including the cost of any mitigation measures or other fees or costs arising therefrom or in connection therewith shall be included as part of the Construction Costs. IID will include in any required analyses, the New Facility together with the potential routes and configurations for the Customer Distribution Facilities (defined below). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties acknowledge and agree that execution of this Agreement and construction of the New Facility, or any element thereof, is subject to compliance with CEQA as set forth herein and pursuant to applicable law. 3. Construction Documents. IID shall be responsible for creating all plans, specifications, Page 2 of 23 183 and construction drawings for the engineering and design of the New Facility (the "Construction Documents"). 4. Procurement of Materials. IID will procure products and equipment required for the New Facility, particularly long lead time products and materials, in order to maximize cost efficiencies and avoid delay. 5. Construction of the New Facility. IID shall be responsible for constructing the New Facility, however, in accordance with IID's Regulations (defined below) and DEPG (defined below), each Developer, in consultation with IID, shall obtain any and all permits or approvals required for the New Facility and shall otherwise complete or satisfy all requirements or conditions of service as set forth in IID's Regulations and DEPG with respect to electrical service from the New Facility. Without limitation, an example of the foregoing permits or approvals may include an encroachment permit for work within dedicated roadways adjacent to the New Facility. Each Developer shall bear all responsibility in connection with any required permits, approvals or conditions of service necessary for development and construction of the New Facility and receipt of electrical service therefrom, including all costs therefor, which shall be included as part of the Construction Costs. a. Construction of Distribution Facilities and Special Service Conditions. Separate from any amount paid hereunder by each Developer toward the Construction Costs for the New Facility, each Developer shall also be responsible for and pay the costs for all distribution facilities determined by IID to be necessary for the establishment of electrical service to each Development site(s) or location of electrical service needs for each of the Developers (or their approved successor or assignee) (the "Customer Distribution Facilities").These Customer Distribution Facilities may include the installation of underground and/or overhead distribution conduits, cables, structures, poles, wires and related equipment, including any onsite or offsite from each Developer's respective Development site(s) and/or the location of their respective electrical service needs, all as may be necessary or appropriate for the distribution of electrical energy thereto. All such Customer Distribution Facilities shall be installed in accordance with IID's Regulations and DEPG. Additionally, each Developer shall be responsible for satisfaction of all required service conditions precedent to the establishment of electrical service to all or any part of such Developer's development project, including obtaining necessary or appropriate rights -of -way, permits or entitlements for any such Customer Distribution Facilities to be extended, all in accordance with IID's Regulations and DEPG. Notwithstanding the foregoing, attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and incorporated herein by reference, is a map depicting the route(s) anticipated by IID to be utilized for the extension of such Customer Distribution Facilities, namely underground and overhead distribution feeder circuits, from the New Facility to each Developer's development site(s) and/or the location(s) of the other Participant's electrical service needs. IID makes no representation or warranty as to the viability of such anticipated route(s) for use in the extension of such new Customer Distribution Facilities. To the extent the ultimate design and implementation of any Customer Distribution Facilities vary from those set forth or otherwise contemplated herein and additional permits, approvals, including compliance with CEQA or other applicable laws is required, each Developer requiring or necessitating such Customer Distribution Facilities shall facilitate and pay the cost therefor obtaining such permits or approvals or compliance pursuant to IID's Regulations and DEPG. 6. Payment of Construction Costs. The Developers shall bear all costs, including, without Page 3 of 23 184 limitation, the Construction Costs, incurred in connection with development and construction of the New Facility, by paying their proportionate share thereof such costs, and which costs shall be paid to IID in advance thereof in accordance with the Milestone Payment and Reimbursement Schedule shown on Exhibit "D", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Unless otherwise set forth in this Agreement, each and every payment shall be funded to the City to hold in an interest bearing account pursuant to a separate agreement. All interest earned, if any, in that account shall be treated and spent in the same manner as payments made hereunder. IID shall apply such payments and interest, if any, as set forth in Section 8. Except as set forth in Section 7(c), below, each and every payment paid to IID by each and every Developer hereunder this Agreement is paid unconditionally and shall be nonrefundable. a. Reimbursement to City [and County]. Developers acknowledge that City [and County have] agreed to provide advance funding to I ID toward certain portions of the initial Construction Costs as set forth in that certain Engineering and Procurement Agreement by and between City, County and IID, dated as of , (the "E&P Agreement") and agree that IID is to reimburse City and County for advance funding paid by City and County to IID in accordance with the Milestone Payment and Reimbursement Schedule, first from milestone payments paid to IID by each Developer under this Agreement. b. IID Contribution Toward Construction Costs. The Parties hereto, inclusive of IID, acknowledge and agree that I ID shall retain no less than twenty percent (20%) of the gross electrical capacity to be realized from the New Facility for purposes of maintaining electrical system reliability and native -load resiliency (the "Reliability Band") and that for and in consideration of the Reliability Band, IID agrees to contribute exactly twenty percent (20%) of the Construction Costs toward payment of such Construction Costs (the "IID Contribution"). [This Section 5(b) and the IID Contribution is subject to approval by the IID Board of Directors. IID needs to finalize this percentage figure] c. Final Cost. Upon completion (in-service) of the New Facility, IID will true up actual costs, including accounting for the IID Contribution. IID will provide the other Parties with the final actual Construction Cost ("Final Cost") and reasonable supporting information for the Final Cost. If the Final Cost exceeds the amount of the Construction Costs then collected by IID hereunder, including any accrued interest, then each Developer, the City and the County shall reimburse IID for any exceedances within thirty (30) days of mailing of notice of the balance due. If the Final Cost is less than the Construction Costs then collected by IID hereunder, including any accrued interest, then IID shall reimburse each Developer, the City and the County for any balance within sixty (60) days of mailing of notice of the Final Cost, which amount shall be distributed to each Developer, the City and the County in accordance with their pro rata contribution thereto the New Facility. In addition to any other remedy available hereunder, including declaring any Developer, the City or the County hereunder in default pursuant to Section 8 hereof, should any Developer, the City or the County fail to reimburse IID for any exceedances hereunder this Section 5(b), IID may, without further notice therefor to such Developer, the City or they County, reduce, on a pro-rata basis, any reservation of capacity to such Participant (a "Capacity Reduction") until such exceedances are paid in full to IID. If such Participant fails to reimburse IID for any exceedances hereunder no later than one -hundred eighty (180) calendar days following the date of mailing of notice of the Final Cost, then, subject to Section 8(a), IID may elect to allocate any electrical capacity realized from such Capacity Reduction as set forth in Section 8(b), Section 8(b)(i) and Section 9, as IID may deem appropriate under the circumstances in IID's sole and absolute discretion. Page 4 of 23 185 7. Term. The Parties agree that this Agreement and the Capacity Reservation Period (defined below) will remain in effect for a period of Twenty (20) calendar years from the date of completion (in-service) of the New Facility unless extended by mutual written agreement of the Parties. 8. Reservation of Capacity. Each Developer has provided IID with each Developer's respective development plan or schedule of electrical service needs that will use new electrical capacity from the New Facility for each Development. Each Developer's plans involve a phased -in usage of the New Facility as further identified in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Each Developer acknowledges and agrees that the capacity reservation is based upon the plan of service provided to IID by each Developer. Subject to Section 7(a), for a period of twenty (20) years from the date of completion (in-service) of the New Facility, IID shall reserve capacity in the New Facility for each Developer in the quantity outlined in Exhibit A (the "Capacity Reservation Period"). On an annual basis, beginning the first full year following completion (in-service) of the New Facility, IID and each Developer will review each Developers' respective usage of their reserved capacity for its Development. Any deviation in use outside of that identified in Exhibit A will result in a change in available capacity, if any, available in future identified phases. For example, if a Party (other than IID) has a total capacity reservation of 1000 kVA and is intended to be phased -in over four years at 250 kVA per year, and in the first year the total capacity used is 500 WA, then as to such Party, there would only be 500 kVA of reserved capacity remaining for such Party for the remainder of the capacity reservation period. Such annual review of remaining capacity shall not operate to reduce the overall capacity reserved to any Participant hereunder as set forth on Exhibit "A", only that such review shall determine the balance of such reserved capacity remaining for such Participant when accounting for all prior usage or transfer or assignment of such capacity by or from such Participant. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Capacity Reservation Period shall not be applicable to the Reliability Band which is to be allocated permanently to IID for purposes of maintaining electrical system reliability and native -load resiliency. a. Capacity Maintenance Fee. If upon the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date of completion (in-service) of the New Facility any Developer has not then used or caused to be used at least fifty percent (50%) of the capacity reserved for said Developer, then, to extend Developer's reservation of the balance of the capacity then un-used for an additional ten (10) years, Developer shall pay to IID a one-time capacity maintenance fee in an amount equal to one -hundred dollars ($100.00) multiplied by the total capacity (measured in kVA) then remaining on reserve for such Developer (the "Capacity Maintenance Fee"). Developer shall pay such Capacity Maintenance Fee to IID no later than sixty (60) days of mailing of notice thereof to each Developer which may then be subject to the Capacity Maintenance Fee. If Developer fails to pay any portion of the Capacity Maintenance Fee as and when due, IID may terminate the remaining reserved capacity held by IID from the New Facility for the benefit of such Developer hereunder and may, Subject to Section 8(a), elect to allocate any electrical capacity realized from such termination as set forth in either Section 8(b) or Section 8(b)(i) or Section 9, as IID deems appropriate under the circumstances in IID's sole and absolute discretion. Developers acknowledge and agree the Capacity Maintenance Fee is intended to address and compensate for IID's on -going operational costs associated with operation of the New Facility prior to becoming fully subscribed with new electrical service customers. Under no circumstances shall City or County be required to pay a Capacity Maintenance Fee, including the situation in which IID has reallocated to City or County capacity to be funded Page 5 of 23 186 by City or County pursuant to Section 8(b) of this Agreement. b. Transfer or Assignment of Capacity Reservation by Developer. Developers may transfer or assign all or a portion of its capacity reservation only in connection with (i) a transfer of all or any pro rata portion of the specific Development site or project for which Developer's development plan was prepared and submitted to IID as identified herein, or (ii) in connection with Developer's pledge of its capacity reservation hereunder in connection with the pledge of Developer's specific development site or project identified herein for purposes of obtaining financing therefor; provided, however, Developer shall first obtain the written concurrence of IID for such transfer or assignment, and which transfer or assignment, if so approved by I ID, is to be evidenced using the form of Consent to Assignment attached hereto as Exhibit "E" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Form of Assignment") as the same may be amended by IID from time to time. c. Transfer or Assignment of Capacity Reservation by City or County. City or County may transfer or assign all or a portion of any capacity reserved to it hereunder provided (i) such capacity is not already allocated to other otherwise assigned to a particular development site or project or proposed use and (ii) City or the County shall first consult with IID and obtain IID's advance concurrence therefor as evidenced by IID's delivery of a duly executed Form of Assignment (as defined above) therefor such transfer or assignment. d. Prohibition on Transfer or Assignment. In no event may any capacity reserved hereunder to any Party (other than IID) be transferred or assigned pursuant to either of Section 7(a) or 7(b) if the assignee receiving such capacity reservation intends or seeks to make use of such reserved capacity in a location remote from or otherwise not electrically integrated to the New Facility as determined in IID's sole and absolute discretion. 9. Complete Participation. The Parties acknowledge and agree that collective participation by each Developer, the City and the County (the "Participants") as outlined herein this Agreement is absolutely necessary for the complete funding and construction of the New Facility to meet the electrical requirements of each Developer, the City and the County. Unless otherwise set forth in this Agreement, each and every payment made hereunder by each Developer, the City and the County, including any paid pursuant to the Milestone Payment and Reimbursement Schedule shown on Exhibit "D", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, or otherwise, is paid unconditionally and is nonrefundable, provided, however, IID shall apply such payments as set forth in Section 8. In the event one or more Developers fails to pay any monetary sum or otherwise perform any obligation as and when due under this Agreement, IID may declare such Party in default of this Agreement by sending notice thereof to such Party(s) and thereafter providing such Party(s) thirty (30) days to cure such breach. If any Party shall fail to cure such breach following notice and the passage of such thirty -day cure period, IID shall be entitled to immediately terminate this Agreement as to such Party and retain any and all sums then paid by such Party and which such sums IID shall be entitled to apply as follows: first: (1) toward any sums outstanding to City pursuant to Section 5(a) of this Agreement, (2) toward any outstanding financial sums, including, without limitation, any Construction Costs, owing under any contract to which IID has entered into pursuant to this Agreement to facilitate the development and construction of the New Facility; then, (3) toward any financial sums outstanding hereunder this Agreement owed to IID for any portion of the Work completed, including, for example, any engineering work or study, Page 6 of 23 187 prior to such termination; and then, (4) to any other Construction Costs as and when the same may become due in the ordinary course pursuant to this Agreement. In the event of such termination, IID will allocate to such terminated Developer(s) only a pro rata share of the electrical capacity to be realized from the New Facility on the basis of such amounts actually paid by such terminated Developer(s) as the same bears against the Final Cost of the New Facility utilizing the methodology set forth in Section 9(b). The obligation of each Developer, including any to which this Agreement is terminated pursuant to this Section 8, to pay any monetary sum incurred or committed to be incurred or to otherwise be paid pursuant to this Agreement will survive termination of this Agreement. a. City or County Contribution. In the event IID terminates this Agreement as to one or more Developers prior to the Construction Costs being funded in full pursuant to this Agreement, then prior to application of the procedures set forth in Section 8(b) or 8(b)(i) or Section 9, City or the County, at its election, may fund or otherwise perform any obligation of such terminated Developer(s), or such portion thereof as City or the County may desire to elect. In such event, IID will reallocate to City or the County the associated capacity from the New Facility which will be funded by City or the County hereunder this Section 8(a), on a pro rata basis. Upon termination of this Agreement as to any Developer(s), IID will notify City or the County of such termination and thereafter, City or the County shall have no less than forty-five (45) calendar days in which to make its election, if any, as City or the County may desire pursuant to this Section 8(a) to fund or perform the obligation of such terminated Developer(s) or portion thereof and receive therefor a corresponding reservation of capacity from the New Facility. In the event City or County makes any election to participate in the payment of any sum or performance of any obligation of a terminated Developer(s) hereunder, upon such election, and unless otherwise set forth herein, City or the County shall be subject to each and every provision hereof this Agreement as if City or the County were a Developer. In the event City and County each elect to fund or otherwise perform any obligation of such terminated Developer(s) and such elections by each of City and County, collectively, would result in overlap of such obligations, and City and County are unable to agree amongst themselves as to how to resolve such overlap with respect to their respective allocations of the balance of such Construction Costs and any corresponding capacity from the New Facility pursuant to this Section 9(a) on or before the expiration of the foregoing forty-five (45) calendar day period, then such Constriction Costs and corresponding capacity from the New Facility shall be allocated amongst City and County in the same proportionate percentages as City and County maintained under the E&P Agreement. b. Substitute Developer. In the event IID terminates this Agreement as to one or more Developers prior to the Construction Costs being funded in full by any Participant pursuant to this Agreement, and provided the City or the County have not made an election to participate in place of any terminated Developer(s) pursuant to Section 8(a), or City or the County elects to participate in place of any terminated Developer but only as to a portion thereof such obligation of the terminated Developer(s), then IID may, in is sole and absolute discretion, accept one or more substitute developer(s) to participate in this Agreement, on a pro rata basis, in place of any Developer(s) to which this Agreement has been terminated as to the balance of any electrical capacity, or portion thereof, that was to be allocated to such terminated Developer(s) hereunder and which is not elected by City or the County pursuant to Section 8(a). In the event of any such substitution, IID shall notify such substitute developer(s) of the balance of the pro rata cost such substitute developer(s) shall be obligated to pay hereunder as a substituted developer together with the total amount of electrical capacity to be allocated to such substituted developer Page 7 of 23 188 pursuant to this Section 8(b). Such substitute developer(s) shall have forty-five (45) calendar days in which to agree to accept such financial obligation and execute and deliver a counterpart of this Agreement to City, County and IID. IID will also provide notice to the other participating Developers. Nothing herein shall preclude any of the Developers, City or County from participation as a substitute party to any terminated Developers pursuant to this Section 8(a). i. Reallocation of Construction Costs. In the event IID does not accept one or more substitute developers to replace any Developers to which this Agreement has been terminated as set forth in Section 8(b), IID may reallocate the balance of any Construction Costs then remaining to be paid hereunder by and amongst all remaining Developers on a pro rata basis; provided, however, the IID Contribution shall not be adjusted pursuant to any reallocation and shall instead continue to remain twenty percent (20%) of the Construction Costs. In such event, IID will prepare an Updated Milestone Payment and Reimbursement Schedule and deliver the same to Developers, City and the County (as may be applicable). IID will also reallocate to the Developers, City and County (as may be applicable) the excess capacity realized from such termination on the same pro rata basis and which excess capacity each Party (other than IID) may then use or otherwise assign or transfer pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 10. Future Use by Third Parties. If following payment in full of the Final Cost, the (i) Developer(s) respective use of the New Facility, in aggregate, is less than the full added capacity of the New Facility, or (ii) upon termination of this Agreement as to any Developer as permitted hereunder and any resulting reduction in any allocated capacity thereto, including any termination for failure to pay any amount due hereunder, including, without limitation, the Capacity Maintenance Fee, then, IID may make any additional and/or remaining capacity available to prospective third -party customers of IID for their respective electrical service needs. In such event, each Developer, the City and the County may be eligible for reimbursement for a portion of the New Facility cost from such third -party customer(s) in accordance with their pro rata share of the Final Cost of the New Facility. Reimbursement would be available only from third -party customer(s) paid to and through IID as set forth in Section 9. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrases "third -party customer(s) shall mean customers other than the Developers set forth on Exhibit "A" that connect to and/or otherwise make use of the New Facility. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties anticipate that substantively all of the new electrical capacity to be created by development and construction of the New Facility is or will be fully subscribed and allocated for use by Developers and IID such that no excess or unreserved capacity is anticipated from the New Facility. No reimbursement shall be due and owing to any Developer hereunder if such fees are collected from such third -party customer(s) following expiration of the term of this Agreement. a. Collection of Reimbursement from Third -party Customer(s). For the term of this Agreement, IID shall impose a charge upon all third -party users, if any, making use of the New Facility on the basis of such customer(s) pro rata share of the Construction Costs. Funds shall be collected from any and all third -party customer(s) at the time a third -party customer applies to IID for electrical service. In no event shall IID be obligated to reimburse Developers for any third -party customer(s) use of the New Facility, unless and until such third -party customer(s) use the New Facility and provide compensation to IID therefor pursuant to this Section 9(a). Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties anticipate that substantively all of the new electrical capacity to be created by development and construction of the New Facility is or will be fully subscribed and allocated for use by Page 8 of 23 189 Developers and IID hereunder such that no excess or unreserved capacity is anticipated from the New Facility. b. Methodology for Reimbursement. Reimbursement, if any is to occur hereunder, will be based upon the pro rata use of the New Facility by each Developer and third -party customer(s), if any, all on the basis of the Final Cost and without adjustment therefor for inflation, or interest thereon. A determination of use shall be based upon a pro rata charge on the third -party customer(s)' load requirements based on a kVA usage or such other methodology as determined by IID, in its reasonable discretion, that will provide Developers with similar reimbursement from said third -party customer(s). This methodology shall also apply to City and the County to the extent IID has reallocated to City or County capacity to be funded by City or County pursuant to Section 8(b) of this Agreement. c. IID Not Liable for Reimbursement. With exception for the IID Contribution and any obligation to remit any reimbursement hereunder either (1) to City or County pursuant to Section 5(a), or (2) a Developers and/or City or County, or all three as may be applicable, for any fees paid by any third -party customer(s) of IID hereunder this Section 9 for use of any excess capacity from the New Facility, in no event shall IID be liable to the City, County or each Developers, or any of them, for reimbursement for any portion of the cost of the New Facility, including, without limitation, the Final Cost. d. This Section 10 and its provisions are intended only to address use and reimbursement of excess capacity realized from the New Facility in excess of the amounts otherwise allocated pursuant to this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties anticipate that substantively all of the new electrical capacity to be realized from the New Facility is or will be fully subscribed and allocated for use by the Participants and IID hereunder such that no excess or unreserved capacity is anticipated from the New Facility. No provision of this Section 10 concerning reimbursement from third -party customer(s) for use of the New Facility shall be applicable to any transfer or assignment by any Participant pursuant to Section 9(b) or 9(c), as applicable, including as to any value given or exchanged by and between such Participant and any transferee or assignee thereof as may be permitted under this Agreement. 11. Payment and Accounting. IID shall create a segregated account designated for sums it collects from third -party customer(s) which use the New Facility and shall, not more than twice annually, disburse reimbursement to each Developer and/or City or County , or all of them, as may be applicable, together with an accounting of collections and disbursements of such funds, including any to cover administrative costs associated with this Agreement. Such reimbursement shall also include any interest accrued from the segregated account utilized by the IID hereunder. The Parties (and their successors and assignees) agree and acknowledge that the payments made pursuant to this Agreement by each Developer, the City and the County shall be the only payments required of the Participants for the New Facility. 12. Termination of Obligation for Capacity Reservation. IID's obligation to reserve capacity for each Developers shall terminate on the first of the following to occur: (i) the capacity reserved has been used by each Developer or their transferee or assignee; or (ii) upon termination of such reserve capacity, or portion thereof, by IID for failure of each Developer to pay any amounts required hereunder, including, without limitation, the Capacity Maintenance Fee or upon such other default of such Developer; or, (iii) 20 years from date Page 9 of 23 190 of completion (in-service) of the New Facility. IID's obligation to reserve capacity for the City or County, as applicable, shall terminate only once the capacity reserved has been used by City or County, as applicable, or their transferee or assignee. 13. Ownership of the New Facility. The Parties acknowledge and agree that IID solely shall own the New Facility, including all appurtenant equipment, rights, and associated interests made, given, granted or arising in connection therewith, including any manufacturer's warranties upon any of the foregoing, including any which may be acquired pursuant to this Agreement. In accordance with the recitals contained hereinabove, the Parties acknowledge that at all times hereafter the date of this Agreement, the New Facility will be owned, operated and maintained by IID as an integral part of the Avenue 58 Facility and which New Facility shall not be subject to any physical or legal separation therefrom the Avenue 58 Facility under any circumstance and that neither any Developer nor City shall seek or otherwise advocate for in any proceeding, whether legislative or legal, for the legal or physical severance of the New Facility from the Avenue 58 Facility. The Parties (not including IID) shall not acquire any ownership rights in the Avenue 58 Facility or the New Facility, including by virtue of this Agreement. Upon completion of the New Facility, IID shall operate and maintain the New Facility as part of its electric system in accordance with good utility practice. The Parties (and their successors and assignees) agree and acknowledge that the payments made pursuant to this Agreement by the Developers, and where applicable, City and County, shall be the only payments required for the development and construction of the New Facility, and that any successors or assigns of IID shall be bound by the terms of this Agreement with respect to the New Facility. 14. IID Not Liable for Delays. In no event shall IID be responsible under the terms of this Agreement for any delay in completion (in-service) of the New Facility, provided, however, IID will make all commercially reasonable efforts to avoid delay in completion (in-service) of the New Facility. 15. Indemnification and Hold Harmless Aareement. a. As between IID, Agencies and Developers. Developers, separately and severally, shall at all times indemnify, defend, protect and hold harmless IID and each Agency, and their respective Boards, Councils, officers, executives, officials, employees, contractors, agents and representatives from and against any and all suits, causes of action, claims, charges, damages, demands, judgments, civil fines, penalties, costs and expenses (including without limitation, attorneys' fees, and costs of experts and consultants), or losses of any kind or nature whatsoever including, without limitation, business interruption, impairment of contract, death, bodily injury or personal injury to any person, and damage, destruction or loss of use of any property (financial, physical, or intellectual) or, without limitation, any claims or suits made or brought in connection with any administrative or legal proceeding challenging any aspect of the CEQA compliance undertaken by IID pursuant to Section 2 of this Agreement (collectively, "Claims"), arising out of, incident to or directly or indirectly related to: (i) the acts, errors or omissions, performance or nonperformance of any of the Developers their employees, agents, contractors, or representatives, under or in connection with this Agreement; and (ii) the acts, errors, or omissions, or performance of IID, or any Agency, or any of their respective officers, executives, directors, employees, contractors agents or representatives, when such acts or omissions are in combination with the acts, errors, or omissions of any Developer. This duty to defend, indemnify, protect and Page 10 of 23 191 hold harmless shall not extend to any Claims arising from the gross negligence or willful misconduct of IID or any Agency, or their respective officers, directors, employees, contractors or agents. b. As between IID and Agencies. No Agency nor any of their Board, Council, officers, executives, directors, employees, contractors, agents or representatives thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission of IID under or in connection with the Work performed by IID under this Agreement. Pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, IID shall fully indemnify and hold each Agency harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any act or omission of IID under or in connection with the Work performed by IID pursuant to this Agreement. Likewise, neither IID nor its Board, or any officer, executive, director, executive, employee, contractor, agent or representatives thereof shall be responsible for any damage or liability occurring by reason of any act or omission of any Agency under or in connection with this Agreement, and pursuant to Government Code Section 895.4, each Agency, individually, shall fully indemnify and hold IID harmless from any liability imposed for injury (as defined by Government Code Section 810.8) occurring by reason of any act or omission of each such Agency under or in connection with this Agreement. 16. Authority. Each signatory of this Agreement represents that s/he is authorized to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Party for which s/he signs. Each Party represents that it has legal authority to enter into this Agreement and to perform all obligations under this Agreement. If Developers is a business entity, it represents that it is duly organized and authorized to do business in the State of California and if a foreign -organized entity, authorized or otherwise qualified to do business in the State of California. 17. Waiver. The failure of a Party to this Agreement, on any occasion, to insist upon strict performance of any provision of this Agreement will not be considered a waiver of any obligation, right, or duty of, or imposed upon, such Party. Any waiver at any time by either Party of its rights with respect to this Agreement shall not be deemed a continuing waiver or a waiver with respect to any other failure to comply with any other obligation, right, duty of this Agreement. Any waiver of this Agreement shall, if requested, be provided in writing. 18. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by a written instrument executed by each Party to this Agreement. 19. Headings. The paragraph headings used in this Agreement are intended for convenience only and shall not be used in interpreting this Agreement or in determining any of the rights or obligations of the Parties to this Agreement. 20. Integration; Incorporation of Recitals and Exhibits. This Agreement is intended by the Parties to be the final expression of their agreement with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement and the complete and exclusive statement of the terms of this Agreement between the Parties, and supersedes any prior understandings between the Parties, whether oral or written. Each and every of the recitals set forth hereinabove and exhibits referenced hereinabove are hereby incorporated herein this Agreement as is though set forth herein and contain integral terms and conditions of this Agreement. Page 11 of 23 192 a. Administrative Updating of Exhibits. The Parties hereto acknowledge that the exhibits referenced hereinabove and incorporated herein by the above reference may be updated or adjusted over time to reflect changes in names, addresses, and other matters addressed in this Agreement or its incorporated exhibits and agree that the Parties shall have the right to make such administrative updates notwithstanding that such update shall not be interpreted by the Parties to be an amendment of this Agreement unless such update is expressly intended to constitute an amendment or modification of this Agreement in compliance with Section 18 hereof. 21. Partial Invalidity. If, after the date of execution of this Agreement, any provision of this Agreement is held to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under present or future laws effective during the Term of this Agreement, such provision shall be fully severable and the remaining portions of this Agreement shall not be affected thereby and shall remain in force and effect to the fullest extent permissible by law. However, in lieu thereof, there shall be added a provision as similar in terms to such illegal, invalid or unenforceable provision as may be possible and be legal, valid and enforceable. 22. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the successors of the respective Parties to this Agreement. This Agreement and obligations hereunder may not be assigned without the prior written consent of the other Party. 23. Compliance with Law. In performing their respective obligations under this Agreement, the Parties shall comply with and conform to all applicable laws, rules, regulations and ordinances. 24. Third -party Beneficiaries. This Agreement shall not create any right or interest in any non - Party or in any member of the public as a third -party beneficiary. 25. Notices. All notices, requests, demands or other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing unless provided otherwise in this Agreement and shall be deemed to have been duly given and received on: (i) the date of service if served personally or served by electronic mail on the Party to whom notice is to be given at the address(es) provided below, (ii) on the first day after mailing, if mailed by Federal Express, U.S. Express Mail, or other similar overnight courier service, postage prepaid, and addressed as provided below, or (iii) on the third day after mailing if mailed to the Party to whom notice is to be given by first class mail, registered or certified, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: To IID: Imperial Irrigation District Attn: General Manager P.O. Box 937 333 E. Barioni Blvd. Imperial, CA 92251 To City: City of La Quinta Attn: City Manager 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Page 12 of 23 193 To County: County of Riverside Attention: Chief Operating Officer 4080 Lemon Street Riverside, CA 92501 To Developers: See Exhibit "A" 26. Default. Unless otherwise provided for in this Agreement, prior to the initiation of any legal action for a default of this Agreement, the Parties shall meet to discuss resolution of the alleged default before initiating litigation. Each Party shall bear its own attorneys' fees and costs incurred in connection with meeting to resolve the alleged default, unless the Parties agree in writing otherwise. 27. Governinq Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by, interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, as if executed and to be performed wholly within the State of California, and without regard to principles of conflicts of law. Any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be brought in State court located in the County of San Diego, California or Federal court located in the County of San Diego California. Each Party irrevocably agree to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in the State of California for the purpose of litigating any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement and waive any defense of forum non conveniens (or a similar doctrine pertaining to venue). 28. Multiple Counterparts; Electronic Signatures. This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which is deemed an original, but all constitute one and the same instrument. The words "execution," "execute," "signed," "signature," and words of like import in or related to any document to be signed in connection with this Agreement shall be deemed to include electronic signatures or the keeping of records in electronic form, each of which shall be of the same legal effect, validity or enforceability as a manually executed signature or the use of a paper -based recordkeeping system, as the case may be, to the extent and as provided for in any applicable law. 29. No Partnership. This Agreement shall not be interpreted or construed to create an association, joint venture, agency relationship, or partnership between the Parties or to impose any partnership obligation or partnership liability upon either Party. No Party shall have any right, power or authority to enter into any agreement or undertaking for, or act on behalf of, or to act as or be an agent or representative of, or to otherwise bind another Party. 30. Satisfaction of Capacity Condition in Will Serve Letter. To the extent any Developer's Development is conditioned by IID to establish new electric system capacity to facilitate retail electric service to all or any part of Developer's Development, Developer's execution and performance of its obligations hereunder this Agreement, including, without limitation, payment of Developer's pro rata share of the Construction Costs, then IID will, where requested by such Developer, issue a Will Serve Letter or any amendment, addendum or extension of any prior -issued Will Serve Letter (each a "WSL") indicating that such Developers obligation to establish new system capacity for its identified Development is or will be satisfied pursuant to the construction and commissioning of the New Facility Page 13 of 23 194 pursuant to this Agreement. Such WSL, is and will be expressly conditioned upon all of the following: (i) such Developer remaining a Party to this Agreement and otherwise performing all obligations arising hereunder, including, without limitation, payment of the Milestone Payments, (ii) Developer's compliance with IID's Regulations and DEPG, and (iii) Developer's establishment of any Customer Distribution Facilities or such other service requirements, including, without limitation, such distribution service line extensions or modifications as may be required to transmit any reserved capacity hereunder this Agreement to such Developer's Development as identified in said WSL. Notwithstanding the foregoing, to the extent any Developer's Development requires electrical service capacity in excess of the capacity to be reserved to such Developer for its Development pursuant to this Agreement, then IID may include within such requested WSL additional conditions for the establishment of new system capacity to serve the balance of any Developer's Development which cannot be served by the capacity reserved to such Developer hereunder. IID reserves the right to modify or otherwise supersede such WSL, including, for example, in the event this Agreement is terminated as to such Developer in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 31. IID's Regulations and Developer Energy Planning Guide. This Agreement is subject to IID's Regulations ("Regulations") and Developer Energy Planning Guide ("DEPG") and Substation Guidelines ("Substation Guidelines") all as may be amended from time -to -time. In the event of any conflict between the provisions of this Agreement and any of the foregoing documents, the foregoing documents shall govern and control. Regulations: https://www.iid.com/power/rates-regulations/regulations DEPG: https://www.iid.com/home/showpublisheddocument/14229/638808431962130000 [Signature page follows.] Page 14 of 23 195 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered as of the date first above written. am IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT By: Name and Title: PARTICIPANTS: CITY: CITY OF LA QUINTA By: Name and Title: COUNTY: COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE By: Name and Title: DEVELOPERS: [Developer signature page attached.] Page 15 of 23 196 DEVELOPER SIGNATURE PAGE: DEVELOPER #1 By: Its: DEVELOPER #2 By: Its: DEVELOPER #3 By: Its: Page 16 of 23 197 EXHIBIT A SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPERS Developer: [Entity] Project: [Name] Description: _unit SFR development Location: Estimated kVA: Phase 1 kVA: Developer: [Entity] Project: [Name] Description: _unit SFR development Location: Estimated kVA: Phase 1 kVA: Developer: [Entity] Project: [Name] Description: _unit SFR development Location: Estimated kVA: Phase 1 kVA: Page 17 of 23 .; EXHIBIT B SCHEMATIC REPRESENTATION OF NEW FACILITY [Insert IID Avenue 58 50MVA Transformer Bank Addition Concept document.] Page 18 of 23 199 EXHIBIT C ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS [To be inserted.] Page 19 of 23 200 EXHIBIT D MILESTONE PAYMENT AND REIMBURSEMENT SCHEDULE' Total good faith, high level cost estimate: 1. Amount Due 30 days after Execution: 2. Amount Due 3. Amount Due 4. Amount Due 5. Amount Due 6. Amount Due $XXXX.002 $XXXX.00 $XXXX.00 $XXXX.00 $XXXX.00 $XXXX.00 $XXXX.00 [Each Milestone Payment will separately identify the pro-rata share for each Developer.] [Provision for Reimbursement to City and County under Section 5(a)] [Provision for IID Contribution under Section 5(b) if approved by IID Board of Directors] 1 IID shall be under no obligation to perform any activity under this Agreement unless City, County and/or each Developer, as the case may be, shall have deposited adequate funds to pay for such work. Further, since IID has no control over the cost of labor or material, the estimated costs set forth in this Milestone Payment and Reimbursement Schedule above are furnished only for the convenience of the City, County and each Developer. They are intended to reflect the costs of similar materials and similar work performed under favorable conditions. Because of the unforeseen contingencies and other factors, the actual costs may be considerably higher or lower. Therefore, the estimate costs are not a warranty by IID of the actual costs to complete all of the milestone activities listed above for the estimated cost also shown above. The estimated deposits above are not a warranty by IID of the actual cost to complete the work required by IID; City, County and each Developer will be required to pay the actual cost on the terms set forth in this Agreement. 2 Total high level estimated project costs are $XXXX.XX however, the initial deposit amount of $XXXX.XX was advanced by City and County and shall be subject to repayment as set forth above. Following repayment of the sum advanced by the City and County hereunder, each Developer, or City, or County at City's or County's election as set forth in this Agreement, as the case may be, will make the milestone payments for the remaining estimated project costs of $XXXX.XX as reflected in the Milestone Payment and Reimbursement Schedule. Page 20 of 23 201 EXHIBIT E FORM OF ASSIGNMENT [To be inserted.] Page 21 of 23 202 ASSIGNMENT AND TRANSFER OF ELECTRICAL CAPACITY This Assignment and Transfer of Electrical Capacity ("Agreement") is made and entered into as of this _ day of , 20_, by and between Assignor and Assignee, on the terms and conditions set forth herein below. Notwithstanding any provision herein, no assignment or transfer of electrical capacity as contemplated herein shall be effective until the consent of the Imperial Irrigation District ("IID") therefor is obtained. Assignor: Name: Address: City/State/Zip: Contact Number: Project Name: _ Location of Use: Assignee: Name: Address: City/State/Zip: _ Contact Number: Re: Assignment and transfer of electrical capacity (MVA) associated with: Project Name: Account or Project ID: Location of Use: Assigned Capacity: MVA Agreement 1. Assignment. The Assignor hereby assigns, transfers, and sets over to the Assignee all rights, title, and interest in and to the above -referenced electrical capacity, the same being _ MVA, which capacity is made available to Assignee solely from the Imperial Irrigation District's Avenue 58 Substation, located north of Avenue 58, west of Monroe Street, La Quinta, California, and which electrical capacity shall be available for use solely for the Project at the Location of Use identified above 2. Effective Date. This assignment shall take effect on the day of 20_, subject to written consent of IID, as provided below. 3. Representations and Warranties. The Assignor represents and warrants that it has full authority to assign the electrical capacity subject to the consent of IID, as provided below, that such capacity is free from liens, claims, or encumbrances, and that no prior conflicting assignments exist with respect to the electrical capacity assigned hereunder 4. Assumption by Assignee. The Assignee accepts the assignment subject to the limitations set forth herein and as may be imposed by IID in connection with the use of such reserved capacity, including pursuant to IID's Regulations and Developer Energy Planning Guide, as each may be amended from time to time, and Assignee further agrees to assume all rights, duties, and Page 22 of 23 203 obligations associated with the assigned capacity as of the Effective Date subject to such limitations. 5. Bound by Terms and Use Limitation. The Assignee acknowledges and agrees to be bound by all applicable utility rules, agreements, and conditions relating to the electrical capacity. The assigned electrical capacity may only be used at the location specified above and only in the amount stated herein. Any unauthorized use or reassignment is strictly prohibited unless approved in writing by IID. 6. Governing Law; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by, interpreted and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of California, as if executed and to be performed wholly within the State of California, and without regard to principles of conflicts of law. Any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement shall be brought in State court located in the County of San Diego, California and/or Federal court located in the County of San Diego, California. Each Party irrevocably agree to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of such courts in the State of California for the purpose of litigating any dispute arising out of or relating to this Agreement and waive any defense of forum non conveniens (or a similar doctrine pertaining to venue). 7. Signatures. The undersigned have all requisite authority to execute this Agreement and undertake all obligations arising therefrom or in connection therewith. Assignor: Signature: Name: Title (if applicable): Date: Assignee: Signature: Name: Title (if applicable): Date: Consent of Imperial Irrigation District The undersigned, as an authorized representative of the Imperial Irrigation District, hereby consents to the assignment and transfer of the electrical capacity described herein. Signature: Name: _ Title: Date: Page 23 of 23 204 ATTACHMENT 3 [form of] FINANCING AGREEMENT THIS FINANCING AGREEMENT ("Agreement" or "Financing Agreement") is made and entered into this day of , 202_, by and between the LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY, a public body corporate and politic ("Authority"), and the CITY OF LA QUINTA, a California municipal corporation and charter city ("City"). RECITALS WHEREAS, Authority is a joint powers authority duly created, established, and authorized to transact business and exercise its powers under and pursuant to the Joint Exercise of Powers Act, Chapter 5 of Division 7 of Title 1 (commencing with Section 6500) of the Government Code ("JPA Law"); and WHEREAS, City is a municipal corporation and a charter city of the State of California organized and existing under the Constitution of the State of California; and WHEREAS, for purposes of City's participation in and execution of this Agreement, California law has long recognized and authorized the production, generation, transmission, and furnishing of (among other utilities) electric power for use by the public. (See, e.g., Cal. Const., Art. XI, § 9(a) [municipal corporations may establish, purchase, and operate public works to furnish its inhabitants with (among other utilities) electric power]; id., Art. XII, § 3 [Public Utilities Commission may regulate private providers of electric power].) Likewise, California law has long recognized and authorized the ability for public agencies not only to charge users of electric power for improvements and services from that utility but also to use public funds in furtherance of providing electric power as a utility. (See, e.g., Independent Energy Producers Assn., Inc. v. State Bd. of Equalization (2004) 125 Cal.AppAth 425, 443 [electric power facilities constructed with assistance of public funds].); and WHEREAS, Imperial Irrigation District ("IID") is the electric service provider within a defined service territory area within Imperial County, California and portions of Riverside County, California ("District Service Area"). The City is within IID's District Service Area; and WHEREAS, City seeks to facilitate new growth and development opportunities within the City's boundary and sphere of influence, which include inducements for IID to develop new electrical distribution service within the IID District Service Area within the City's boundary and sphere of influence. In furtherance thereof, City has entered into the following agreements: (1) ENGINEERING AND PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT dated , 202_, by and between City and IID ("Procurement Agreement"); and (2) FUNDING AND RESERVATION OF CAPACITY AGREEMENT for AVENUE 58 TRANSFORMER BANK ADDITION, dated , 202_, by and among City, IID, County of Riverside a political subdivision of the State of California ("County"), and 205 the "Developer(s)" identified therein ("Funding Agreement"). [NOTE — FUTURE AGREEMENTS, OR AMENDMENTS TO AGREEMENTS, SHOULD BE LISTED HERE The executed versions of the Procurement Agreement and Funding Agreement [NOTE: INSERT ANY OTHER AGREEMENT OR AMENDMENT HERE (collectively, the "City Electric Power Participation Agreements") are attached hereto for reference as Exhibit A and Exhibit B, respectively; and WHEREAS, as more specifically provided in the applicable City Electric Power Participation Agreements, City will advance funding necessary for provision of electric power (such as, advance funding for initial engineering and to procure the long -lead equipment necessary for the construction of new electrical infrastructure improvements), and, as such, City is entitled to reimbursement from the Developer(s) as more particularly set forth in the applicable City Electric Power Participation Agreements; and WHEREAS, because the completion of the electric infrastructure improvements by IID and the reimbursement from the Developer(s) pursuant to the applicable City Electric Power Participation Agreements will occur over an extended period of time, City and Authority enter into this Financing Agreement for, among other purposes: (1) Memorializing that City has agreed to loan general fund moneys (and, potentially, reserve funds that may be used for such purposes pursuant to City policy and procedures) to the Authority, in an amount not to exceed the total appropriation of City funds authorized by the La Quinta City Council to be available to be advanced to IID, so that repayment of the City's loan as contemplated by the applicable City Electric Power Participation Agreements may be documented and "booked" from all possible repayment methods; (2) In turn, upon receipt of the loan from City, the Authority will advance funds to IID but subject to reimbursement by the Developer(s) to Authority (or to City if so directed by the City Manager/Authority Executive Director) for each Developer(s)'s respective development projects in City; (3) To account for the fact that reimbursements from the Developer(s) will occur potentially years after the advancement of funds to IID, and to account for the "present value" of the amount the Developer(s) would have had to pay in development impact fees ("DIF Fees") but for the advancement of funds from Authority to IID to pay for the electric infrastructure improvements attributable to the Developer(s)'s development project, the interest on City's loan to Authority shall be, and may not exceed, an annual increase based on the cost of living adjustment (COLA) as more particularly described in this Agreement; and WHEREAS, City's loan to Authority, and Authority's advance to IID, has been determined to be necessary and proper for the immediate need to stabilize and improve the provision of electric power to City's residents, businesses, visitors, and all other members of the public. Furthermore, the City's Loan to Authority, and Authority's advance to IID, is necessary for furthering and implementing the City Electric Power 206 Participation Agreements. As such, the Loan from City to Authority, and advance from Authority to IID for the purposes specified in this Agreement and the City Electric Power Participation Agreements are consistent with California law and in furtherance of the provision of electric power for the benefit of the public and a valid public use of those funds; and WHEREAS, it is anticipated that City's loan to Authority, set forth herein, shall be repaid by the Developer(s) from their respective purchases of capacity for electricity, whether in the form of DIF Fees payment or otherwise, pursuant to the applicable City Electric Power Participation Agreements; and WHEREAS, City and Authority now seek to enter in this Agreement. AGREEMENT NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises hereinafter contained, Authority and City agree as follows: City Loan to Authority; Interest; Use of Loan Principal. City hereby loans to Authority the principal amount of ($ ) [NOTE: INSERT AMOUNT OF CITY FUNDS TO BE CONTRIBUTED TO IID FOR IMPROVEMENTS; AMOUNT CANNOT EXCEED TOTAL APPROPRIATION APPROVED BY COUNCILS ("Loan Principal") from the City's general fund or any other lawful source of funds held by City. The Loan Principal shall be used and advanced to IID to pay for authorized electric infrastructure improvements as provided in the applicable City Electric Power Participation Agreements. Interest on the Loan Principal shall accrue annually based on the cost of living adjustment (COLA) according to the following: Commencing from date of receipt by IID of the Loan Principal, and every year thereafter until fully repaid, annual interest shall accrue based on the percentage increase in the Consumer Price Index (or similar nationally recognized inflationary index) (the "CPI") for All Urban Consumers, not seasonally adjusted, for the Riverside - San Bernardino -Ontario statistical area (or subsequent similar index in which City is located), averaged for the twelve (12) month period prior to the annual interest calculation date (the "Annual COLA Interest"). The Loan Principal and any and all applicable Annual COLA Interest are collectively the "City's Loan Repayment Amount." Repayment; Term of Loan. The City's Loan Repayment Amount shall be repaid to City by Authority upon receipt by Authority, either from IID or the Developer(s) responsible for paying the City pursuant to the applicable City Electric Power Participation Agreement. The City Manager/Authority Executive Director may direct IID or any Developer(s) as to whether repayment of City's Loan Repayment Amount (or any portion thereof) should be paid directly to City or to Authority. Any and all repayments received by City pursuant to this Agreement shall be accounted for by the City's Finance Department. All amounts due under this Agreement shall be payable at the offices of the City. 207 The City's Loan Repayment Amount shall be repaid no later than the expiration of the "Term" of this Agreement, which shall commence on the date inserted into the preamble of this Agreement, and shall end on the date of the earliest to occur: (1) Full repayment by Authority, and/or by HD, and/or by the Developer(s) responsible for paying the City, pursuant to the applicable City Electric Power Participation Agreement; (2) the expiration date of the City Electric Power Participation Agreements; or (3) Ten years from the commencement date of this Agreement. Subordination. The repayment of the Loan Principal and any Annual COLA Interest shall be junior and subordinate to all City obligations and Authority obligations incurred prior to the date of this Agreement. Non -Recourse Obligation. No officer, official, employee, agent, or representatives of City or Authority shall be liable for any amounts due hereunder, and no judgment or execution thereon entered in any action hereon shall be personally enforced against any such officer, official, employee, agent, or representative. Entire Agreement; Amendments. This Agreement, and the applicable City Electric Power Participation Agreements, shall constitute the entire agreement of the City and Authority. This Agreement may be amended or modified only by an agreement in writing signed by City and Authority. [end — signature page follows] W: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their authorized representatives, as of the date first above written. "AUTHORITY" LA QUINTA FINANCE AUTHORITY Jon McMillen, Executive Director ATTEST: Monika Radeva, Authority Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: William H. Ihrke, Authority Counsel "CITY" CITY OF LA QUINTA in Jon McMillen, City Manager ATTEST: Monika Radeva, City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: William H. Ihrke, City Attorney 209 EXHIBIT A PROCUREMENT AGREEMENT [attached] 210 EXHIBIT B FUNDING AGREEMENT [attached] 211 212 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 1 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE: ADOPT RESOLUTION TO AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY HOUSING AND WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS AND EXECUTE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/27 RECOMMENDATION Adopt a resolution to authorize the City Manager to submit applications to the Riverside County Housing and Workforce Solutions for Community Development Block Grant funds, execute the Supplemental Agreements for fiscal year 2026/27; and allocate $23,580 to the Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley Fee Waiver/Reduction Program, and $133,620 to the City of La Quinta Americans with Disabilities Act Improvements Project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The City is eligible to receive approximately $157,200 in Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds in fiscal year (FY) 2026/27; 15% can be used for public services projects and 85% for public improvements or housing services. • City -approved grant applications must be submitted to the Riverside County Housing and Workforce Solutions (County HWS) no later than December 18, 2025. The exact amount of CDBG funding will be confirmed in the second quarter of 2026. FISCAL IMPACT Upon approval by the County HWS, the City will receive an estimated $157,200 in CDBG funds. The final FY 2026/27 funding allocation will be based upon actual funds received. Revenues and expenses will be incorporated in the FY 2026/27 City Budget and tracked in a special revenue fund, Account No. 210-0000-43105 CDBG (Federal Assistance Fund). BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The City is a cooperating city of the County's CDBG program and has participated since 1983. HWS oversees the County's program and the County distributes annual funding to cooperating cities. The CDBG program requires that each project/activity funds are used meets one of the 3 national objectives: 1) benefit low and moderate -income individuals; 2) aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; or 3) meet a need having a particular urgency. 213 Public Services CDBG funding can be used for public services, such as childcare, recreation and education programs; however, only 15% of the awarded annual allocation may be designated for public services, or a maximum of $23,580 for FY 2026/27 based on the total amount of $157,200 anticipated to be distributed to the City. The County HWS has a minimum funding requirement of $10,000 for this category. The Boys and Girls Club requested $24,000 for FY 2026/27. Public Improvements CDBG funding can be used for public improvements, which include construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, and accessibility improvements. Public improvement funds can be used for facilities and improvements that are publicly owned or owned by a non- profit agency open to the public. These funds must be used for improvements that benefit low- and moderate -income individuals or neighborhoods. Based on the County's guidelines for allocation of funds, 85% of the annual allocation awarded may be designated for public/capital improvements, or a maximum of $133,620 for FY 2026/27 based on the total amount anticipated to be distributed to the City. CDBG Applications The City received 3 applications for CDBG funding (Attachment 1) — The Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley and Palm Springs International Film Society (PSIFS) submitted a public service application; and the City's Engineering Services Division submitted a public improvement -funding request. Staff recommends awarding the anticipated public service funds of $23,580 to the Boys and Girls Club; and $133,620 to the City's Engineering Services division. The Boys and Girls Club funding will benefit 25 children who attend; the public improvement request will fund American with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements at City facilities that benefit individuals with disabilities and those who have low and moderate income. Agency and Public Review A request for applications and notice of funding availability was posted to the City's website on October 27, 2025. A public notice was published in The Desert Sun on December 5, 2025, announcing the availability of funds and the public hearing date. ALTERNATIVES Council may allocate funds to an alternate single applicant in each category, or an alternate combination of applicants and funding amounts in each category. Prepared by: Carley Escarrega, Administrative Technician Approved by: Bryan McKinney, Public Works Director/City Engineer Attachment: 1. Fiscal Year 2026/27 CDBG Summary of Applications 214 RESOLUTION NO. 2025 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING PROPOSALS, AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT APPLICATIONS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS, AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2026/2027 WHEREAS, The City of La Quinta (City) is a participating jurisdiction in the County of Riverside Housing and Workforce Solutions Community Development Block Grant Program, and WHEREAS, the City and County of Riverside (County) cooperatively administer the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program under the provision of the Cooperative Agreement executed between the City and County, and under applicable U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development rules; and WHEREAS, the Public Works Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 5, 2025, announcing the public hearing date, availability of funds, and requesting proposals; and WHEREAS, pursuant to said agreement, the City Council held a public hearing on December 16, 2025, to consider public comments on community needs and the use of such funds; and WHEREAS, the CDBG Funds for fiscal year 2026/2027 is estimated to be approximately $157,200 to begin July 1, 2026; and WHEREAS, the City must submit project applications to the County of Riverside Housing and Workforce Solutions; and WHEREAS, merits of all proposals were openly discussed and considered; and WHEREAS, by a majority vote of the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, the following proposal(s), or reprogramming(s), were selected: PROJECT NAME Miscellaneous ADA Improvements Fee Waiver/Reduction Program SPONSOR AMOUNT City of La Quinta $133,620 Coachella Valley Boys and $ 23,580 Girls Club La Quinta Unit TOTAL: $157,200 215 Resolution No. 2025 — XXX CDBG Funds and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 2 of 3 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the City of La Quinta hereby selects the above -named projects, for use of Community Development Block Grant funds. SECTION 2. That the City Council hereby directs the City Manager to prepare and submit the designated applications to the County of Riverside Housing and Workforce Solutions in a timely manner proposing the named use of funds. SECTION 3. That the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to approve and execute the 2026/27 Supplemental Agreement between the Riverside County Economic Development Agency and the City. SECTION 4. That the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute any and all necessary documents and other agreements to consummate all activities in this resolution. SECTION 5. If there is shortfall in funding, the City Council directs the City Manager to request the County of Riverside to increase the City's public service cap in order to fully fund public service approved applications. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 16th day of December 2025, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 216 Resolution No. 2025 — XXX CDBG Funds and Priorities for Fiscal Year 2026/2027 Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 3 of 3 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 217 218 ATTACHMENT 1 CITY OF LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM 2026/2027 SUMMARY OF APPLICATIONS RECEIVED Public Service Applications THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF THE COACHELLA VALLEY — LA QUINTA UNIT: • The Boys and Girls Club of the Coachella Valley was founded in 1966. • After school program has been provided in the City of La Quinta since 1994. • The fee waiver/reduction program has been funded by the City of La Quinta with CDBG funds for the past 20 years. Funds Requested/Service Provided: • Requesting $24,000 for fee waiver/reduction program to provide scholarships benefiting extremely low-, very low-, low-, and moderate -income children. • $23,580 will enable 25 qualifying children to take advantage of the Club's services and programs. PALM SPRINGS INTERNATIONAL FILM SOCIETY (PSIFS): • PSIFS was founded in 1989. • The primary objective of Student Screening Day (SSD) is to provide equitable, arts -based learning opportunities for low-income students at La Quinta High School (LQHS). • SSD is an opportunity to explore topics and themes that resonate with culturally relevant and progressive topics. Students are invited to attend an in -person film screening of curated film screening followed by a moderated discussion with industry professionals. Funds Requested/Service Provided: • Requesting $10,000 to help cover only the portion of the program serving the low-income LQHS students. • In 2025, SSD served 1,725 students across 18 schools. Public ImDrovement ADplications CITY OF LA QUINTA Project Summary: • The City of La Quinta Public Works Department submitted an application requesting $133,620 of CDBG funding for Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements at various City owned public parks and public facilities. 219 • Project will correct ADA deficiencies at various City owned public parks and facilities throughout the City of La Quinta. • The ADA improvements at various City owned facilities throughout the City will promote easier accessibility for individuals with disabilities. • The improvements are based upon an ADA Transition Plan Report previously completed by the City. • Funding will allow for design, construction, inspection, and testing costs associated with ADA improvements. 220 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 City of La Quinta CITY COUNCIL MEETING: December 16, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITLE :CONSIDER AN APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025- 0001 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF THE 384 ACRE SITE, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GOLF COURSE, PERIMETER LANDSCAPE, AND SALES CENTER; PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB; LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET RECOMMENDATION' Consider Administrative Appeal 2025-0001 (Appeal). Subject to modification based on written and verbal testimony and evidence that may be presented prior to and during the public hearing, staff's recommendation is as follows: Adopt a resolution denying Appeal 2025-0001 and upholding Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-012, adopted on October 28, 2025, approving Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), Site Development Permit 2025-0001 and Site Development Permit 2025-0002 to allow the subdivision of the 384-acre site, the development of the golf course, perimeter landscape, and sales center within the Coral Mountain Club project. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan (SP 2003-067) was amended in 2024 to modify the layout, development standards, and design guidelines for the west half of the Specific Plan area (west of Madison Street). This portion of the Specific Plan is now referred to as Coral Mountain Club and allows up to 750 dwelling units, a golf course, and a commercial corner on the 384-acre site. • An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified by Council on March 5, 2024, via Resolution 2024-007, which analyzed the development of the Specific Plan Amendment as approved. • The Tentative Tract Map (TTM) and Site Development Permits (SDPs), which are the subject of this administrative appeal, are the first implementing applications for the approved Specific Plan Amendment. • The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 28, 2025, and after considering all public comments, including comments from the appellant read into the record by a member of the public, approved the TTM and SDPs by unanimous vote of all members present. 221 BRIEF LEGAL SUMMARY OF ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL The California Constitution grants cities numerous powers, including what is commonly known as the "police power," that serves as the foundation for cities to enact and enforce land use laws. (Cal. Const., art. XI, § 7.) While policy considerations and the adoption of subdivision and zoning laws involve the exercise of a city's "legislative powers," periodically, the decisions made by the administrators of a city's adopted subdivision and zoning laws may be disputed or challenged. When there is a dispute or challenge, this may result, like here, in an administrative appeal that requires a city to exercise "quasi-adjudicatory" or "quasi-judicial" powers. Because the Council will be acting in this quasi-judicial capacity, the U.S. and California Constitutions require a minimum of "due process" when reviewing any administrative appeal. In quasi-judicial actions, due process requires decision -makers to be fair and impartial. (Cal. Municipal Law Handbook (Cal. CEB, 2023), §10.436 [citing, English v. City of Long Beach (1950) 35 Cal.2d 155, 158].) State law requires that there should not be an "unacceptable probability of actual bias" from any Council Member by expressing a strong personal position to the public or press prior to considering the Appeal, thereby maintaining the touchstone of neutrality prior to hearing the matter. (Woody's Group, Inc. v. City of Newport Beach (2015) 233 Cal.AppAth 1012, 1022.) With respect to the Appeal, the TTM and two SDPs are both subject to the administrative process set forth in La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) Section 9.200.110. (LQMC, §§ 9.210.010(F),13.12.140(C).) Because the TTM and SDPs required a public hearing at the Planning Commission, a public hearing was noticed and must be held for the Appeal. (LQMC, § 9.200.110(C)(4).) Pursuant to City law, only issues raised by the appellant or another person by verbal or written testimony made before or during the public hearing at the Planning Commission should be considered for the Appeal, and the Council may refuse to consider any issues which were not raised before the Planning Commission's consideration of the TTM and SDPs. (LQMC, § 9.200.110(C)(5).) RECOMMENDED PROCEDURE FOR PUBLIC HEARING Because the Council is the reviewing body, the open and public meetings requirements of the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code, § 54950, et seq. (Brown Act)) apply, and, pursuant thereto (Gov. Code, § 54954.3(b)), the City Council adopted "Rules of Procedure" for conducting its public meetings (Reso. No. 2022-027). Pursuant to the Rules of Procedure and general standard practices, the Mayor, as presiding officer, governs the meeting and may make accommodations or limitations as the item is considered, including the order of calling parties to present their cases and any allocations of time to present testimony. Based on general standard practices for conducting administrative appeals that are Public Hearing agenda items before the Council, the following process is proposed: • The Mayor calls the item for consideration. 222 o Council members should disclose whether they have had any meetings with the appellant or any other interested party, such as the developer, owner or representative of the applicant of the applications on appeal. o Council members should disclose whether, prior to consideration at this meeting, they have made any material public statements, such as to the press, concerning a position advocating for or against the item on appeal. • City Staff presents staff report regarding the item on appeal. • Mayor opens the public hearing and calls the appellant and any representatives of the appellant to present testimony. o Recommended total allotted time: 15 minutes; appellant may ask the Mayor to reserve time for any rebuttal or closing statement. o Written evidence may be received during the hearing. o Council may ask questions during testimony, which would not count towards 15-minute total allotted time. • Mayor calls the applicant, and any representative of the applicant, of the applications (TTM and two SDPs) on appeal. o Recommend total allotted time: 15 minutes; applicant may ask the Mayor to reserve time for any rebuttal or closing statement. o Written evidence may be received during the hearing. o Council may ask questions during testimony, which would not count towards 15-minute total allotted time. • Mayor calls other interested persons or members of the public wishing to provide comments. o Recommend time for any other interested party or public: 3 minutes. o Written evidence may be received. o No rebuttal time may be reserved. • Mayor asks each Council member if there are additional questions for the appellant, applicant, or any other interested party. • If time was reserved, Mayor calls appellant and applicant for rebuttals or closing statements. • Mayor closes public hearing and asks for discussion among Council based on testimony and evidence presented. • Mayor calls for action that must be one of the following (LQMC, § 9.200.110(C)(6)): o Sustain (uphold), reverse, or modify the Planning Commission's decision; o Continue the Appeal for further consideration; or o Refer the application back to the Planning Commission with directions. NOTE: Action to reverse or modify the Planning Commission's decision requires a majority vote of Council Members present, and if there is a tie vote, the original decision of the Planning Commission stands. 223 • Mayor or City Clerk announces action taken. BACKGROUND OF THE PROJECT AND ADMINISTRATIVE APPEAL The Specific Plan Amendment for the Coral Mountain Club (Amendment No. 5 of SP 2003- 067), approved by the City Council in 2024, established the parameters for the build -out of the western half of the Andalusia project, including up to 750 residential units, an 18-hole golf course and its ancillary facilities (clubhouse, maintenance yard, driving range, etc.), and a 7± acre site for neighborhood commercial development. The 3 applications (TTM and 2 SDPs) that are the subject of the Appeal are the first implementation tools for that Specific Plan Amendment. The applications consist of: o A TTM to subdivide the 384± acres into 204 residential lots (including 3 lots that may be further subdivided in the future for additional single-family or condominium units), 1 commercial lot, as well as lots for the golf course, streets, and ancillary facilities. o An SDP to allow the development of the golf course, and the perimeter landscaping and walls. The latter are required to be in the first phase of development per the original approval. The golf course SDP consists only of the golf course landscaping plans. In the coming months, an application for the golf course buildings, including the clubhouse, golf maintenance yard, and other ancillary structures, will be submitted to the Commission for review. o An SDP to allow the construction of a sales center for the homes. Typically, a Minor Use Permit (MUP) is processed for a model home complex and sales office/center for a duration of 2 years. In this case, however, the applicant proposes that the sales center be in place for the entire build -out of the tract and anticipates that this will be longer than an MUP would allow. Planning Commission Action At its meeting of October 28, 2025, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the 3 applications. At that meeting, following public comments and a number of questions to staff and the applicant, the Commission approved the 3 applications by a vote of 6-0-1 (one member being absent). Please see Planning Commission Resolution 2025- 012, Attachment 4. The appellant filed Appeal 2025-0001 on November 7, 2025. As is required by LQMC Section 9.200.110(C)(6), the Appeal was scheduled for hearing before the City Council within 45 days of receipt and acceptance by the director. BASIS OF APPEAL, APPELLANT'S ARGUMENTS, AND STAFF RESPONSES The Appeal consists of the original submittal by the appellant (Attachment 1) and supplemental letter filed on November 20, 2025 (Attachment 2). The supplemental letter also included a number of additional attachments, which are provided as Attachment 3. On the broadest level, the appellant challenges the City's review of the project (both the original Specific Plan Amendment and the current TTM and two SDPs) under the California 224 Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. (CEQA). That challenge is not supported by substantial evidence. The City prepared a comprehensive and thoroughly researched and documented Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the Specific Plan Amendment approval. As required by CEQA and its implementing guidelines, California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15000 et seq. (CEQA Guidelines), the EIR was undertaken "as early as feasible in the planning process to enable environmental considerations to influence project program and design and yet late enough to provide meaningful information for environmental assessment." (CEQA Guidelines, § 15004(b)). The project was assessed based on its build -out to ensure that both short-term and long- term impacts were addressed; and the project's impacts in relation to other projects planned in the City, and south La Quinta in particular, were assessed to determine cumulative impacts. The EIR underwent a comprehensive public review period, and substantial public comments were addressed. The EIR included the currently proposed project as Alternative 2, and analyzed all of its impacts, which were found to generally be less significant than the preferred alternative. The City Council certified the EIR for Alternative 2, as considered under CEQA Guidelines Sections 15002 and 15008, and the City filed a Notice of Determination with the County of Riverside and the State Clearinghouse. There were no challenges to the EIR, and no changes in the project or current conditions have occurred that would significantly change the level of impact or mitigation measures in the EIR. The EIR, therefore, does not require further review. Procedural Issues The Appeal challenges the process under which the project was evaluated and approved (Attachment 1, Section 2.A.). Specifically, the appellant states that there was inadequate public notice, lack of access to a staff report and other materials, representation by a third party at the public hearing, and inadequate and not "forthcoming" City staff in providing requested information. Inadequate Public Notice: The appellant's opinion that 10-day public notice is inadequate is noted, but is not supported under the law. LQMC Section 9.200.100(D) explicitly lists that the City is required to notify the property owner, the applicant, local agencies, and owners of real property within 500 feet of the borders of the project site; and to publish a legal notice in the newspaper "not less than ten (10) days prior to the hearing." In this case, notices were mailed by the City and posted on the City's website on October 16, 2025, and the notice was published in the Desert Sun newspaper on October 17, 2025. Public Notice for the project was therefore conducted in full compliance of legal requirements. The appellant also cites prior public comment and inconsistencies in the documentation for the prior project as reason for additional notice but does not provide specific examples of such. As a result, it is not possible to ascertain what inconsistencies the appellant wanted addressed. However, it is important to note that the Specific Plan and EIR were thoroughly reviewed, including multiple hearings before the Planning Commission and Council, first in 2021 when the proposed surf pool project was denied, and again in 2024 when the revised project (golf course and 750 homes) Specific Plan Amendment (SP 2003-067, Amendment No. 5) was approved and the EIR was certified. Both the approval of SP 2003-067, as amended, and the EIR were subject to appeal procedures, and neither was appealed or 225 challenged in the courts. The period to challenge either action has expired. Therefore, SP 2003-067 and the EIR stand as valid approvals governing the project. Lack of access to staff reports: The appellant believes that the staff report and other materials were not available in sufficient time for "meaningful review," without specifying what additional time should have been provided. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54954.2.(a)(1), the City posted the Planning Commission agenda to the City's website on October 24, 2025, 96 hours prior to the hearing, which exceeds the Government Code's requirement of 72 hours. Prior to that, in response to the appellant's request, the TTM and the plans for both SDPs were uploaded to the Coral Mountain webpage on October 20, 2025, so that the appellant could review them prior to the agenda posting. Representation by a third party at the public hearing_ During the public hearing, the appellant's letter to the Planning Commission was identified by the Commission Secretary as having been distributed to the Commission, and a member of the public, Ms. Alena Callimanis, after presenting her own concerns, stated that she would be reading parts of the appellant's letter because the appellant was out of town, and proceeded to do so (please see Planning Commission video recording at timestamp 0:43, available at https://Iaguinta.cablecast.ty/show/749?seekto=l24&site=1). The appellant's materials were distributed in their entirety to the Commission, and the parts of the appellant's letter were read by a person identifying themselves as having been asked to do so by the appellant. The Commission heard and received appellant's materials. City staff's inadequate response: The appellant states that City staff provided inadequate and "not completely forthcoming" responses to requests for information. Both the Interim Design and Development Director and the Consulting Planner responded to the appellant's requests for information in emails and phone calls within 24 hours whenever possible (barring weekends or absences). Staff made every effort to provide information requested and did not withhold anything that was available in the record. In addition, staff provided the appellant with contact information to outside agencies, links to documents and meetings, and other data upon request. Project -Related Issues General Plan and Zoning Inconsistency: Section 2.B. of Attachment 1 asserts that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan and Zoning of the site. The appellant states that the project should be part of a larger master plan for the "Coral Mountain district," and cites a number of reasons for their request. The request for a master plan, however, is not only beyond the legal purpose and scope of the TTM and two SDPs, it is also not supported by the historic planning pattern for south La Quinta. First, the General Plan, since incorporation, has maintained consistent land use designations for the project site and all lands surrounding it since their annexation to the City. Land uses within this portion of the SP 2003-067 area were accounted for in the current General Plan. Furthermore, Andalusia, Trilogy, and the project site were all part of a Specific Plan (Rancho La Quinta Specific Plan 218) approved by the County in 1988. Upon annexation in 2002, the City accepted the County -approved Specific Plan. In 2003, the land that is now Trilogy became the limits of the original Specific Plan, and a new Andalusia Specific Plan 226 was created, which incorporated the lands still within SP 2003-067. SP 2003-067 has been modified from time to time to reflect changes in Andalusia's development pattern and the revised layout of the homes and golf course on the west side, but has not changed in vision since its inception. This is particularly true given Council's rejection of the surf pool and hotel project proposed in 2021, which was not found consistent with the vision for this part of La Quinta when Council considered the requested amendment. It is therefore clear that the land use vision for this area of the City has been in place for decades, and that the current project is consistent with that vision. In regard to the preservation of open space, the Specific Plan, since its inception in 1988, proposed walled and gated communities that would provide internal open space, but not public open space. The currently proposed project increases access to the public by providing access to an existing de -facto, unofficial trail along the base of Coral Mountain, which would have been lost in prior approvals. It is also important to note that the current de -facto trail is not a designated public trail on or adjacent to the property. There is no public trail in this area, nor has the Bureau of Land Management designated a trail on its properties to the south and west. Therefore, the access assumed by the public is not public access but rather appears to be use of private property by members of the public. Regarding project density, the appellant asserts that the reduction in project density from 750 units to 300± units requires further study, including neighborhood character, preservation of open space, density and fiscal analysis and income from the property. As it relates to neighborhood character, the proposed lot layout is substantially similar to that of Andalusia, PGA West, and Trilogy, which have all been designed to provide homes with golf course views wherever possible. Matters relating to the income to be generated by the project via transient occupancy tax are beyond the legal purpose and scope of the TTM and two SDPs. Rather, matters relating to income to be generated by the project via transient occupancy tax are delineated in the Development Agreement applicable to the project, which was not part of the application or public hearing before the Planning Commission, now on appeal. Finally, the appellant relates the appeal to the financing map [TTM 2023-0005 (37815)] approved in 2024. As described above, that map was approved by the Council unchallenged, and the limitations period to challenge that map has expired. That map is therefore a valid approval. Impacts to Cultural Resources: Section 2.C. of Attachment 1 asserts that the project will impact cultural resources and geologic features. The appellant asserts that she has been denied access to the reports which established the Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA) along the southwestern portion of the site. The City does not provide confidential information related to cultural resources, based on the requests of local tribes, and the principles embodied in the Secretary of the Interior's standards for cultural resources. These restrictions have been in place for many years, and stem from the abuse of public information on archaeological and historic sites, which led to "pot hunters" decimating those sites. The City does release this information to qualified archaeologists for the purpose of research, when that archaeologist is qualified under the 227 Secretary of the Interior's Section 106 standards. The appellant is not a qualified archaeologist and therefore did not receive the archaeologists' reports on the investigations undertaken at the site, since they would reveal the locations of sensitive materials. Publicly available materials were, and still are, available on the City's website. As regards to the location of the trail on the southwestern corner of the site, as clearly stated in the Planning Commission staff report, the trail is proposed to remain in its current location, at the foot of Coral Mountain. The fence, which is required for the protection of the Peninsular Bighorn sheep, will occur immediately east of the trail. The actual location of the fence may vary by a foot or two when installation occurs, based on the groundcover and site conditions, but its installation will be monitored by the biologist and archaeologist to assure that impacts to archaeological and biological resources do not occur. The requirement for a fence was developed in consultation with the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and placed in the Specific Plan. The requirement for the creation of ESAs and the protection of cultural resources is mandated in EIR Mitigation Measure CUL-5 (page 4.4-18 of the EIR). The appellant also challenges the access restrictions associated with the ESAs and the sheep fence, on the basis that they are currently accessed by the public, and that this access will be lost. While members of the public may currently access the ESAs, the rock art and geologic features are located within the ESAs on private property. Their open access to the public may have been due to lack of fencing or patrol by the ownership of the property. That open access has also led to significant vandalism, some of which has permanently defaced and damaged these resources. The EIR did not consider public access to these resources directly, but did, through the requirements of Mitigation Measures CUL-1 and CUL-5 for recordation and protection of these resources, address the need to protect the rock art and other archaeological resources on the site from ongoing damage and vandalism. The appellant asserts that the fencing and ESAs are inconsistent with LQMC Title 7, Section 9.110.070 and General Plan Policy LU-10.2, but appellant does not support this assertion. Title 7 addresses Historic Preservation and specifically states in Section 7.02.020 that its purpose is to "Effect the protection, enhancement and perpetuation of historic resources, landmarks and districts that represent or reflect elements of the cty's diverse cultural, social, economic, political and architectural history," and "Safeguard the cty's historic heritage, as represented by its historic resources, landmarks and historic districts..." The Mitigation Measures included in the EIR, and the ESAs being implemented as a result of these Mitigation Measures, directly implement these statements. LQMC Section 9.110.070 provides for hillside preservation, and the fencing and ESAs would not conflict with the purpose of the hillside development overlay. There is no General Plan Policy LU-10.2. Policy LU-1.2 states, "All land use decisions shall be consistent with all applicable General Plan policies and programs and shall uphold the rights and needs of property owners as well as those of the general public." If that was the Policy intended to be cited by the appellant, the protection of cultural resources is consistent with the General Plan, particularly Goal CUL-2, which states, "Assure that significant identified archaeological and historic resources are protected." 228 Finally, as it relates to the City's conformance with Tribal Consultation requirements under CEQA and AB52, the City conducted Tribal Consultation and involved the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) in all phases of the EIR preparation process, and in its implementation of mitigation measures. The Tribe has been participating in the investigation of resources, the establishment of the ESAs, and the review and approval of a Rock Art Plan for the property. Impacts to Recreational and Visual Resources: Section 2.D of Attachment 1 asserts that the area is widely used by the public, and that fencing will sever public access. The response to this issue is provided in the immediately preceding section of this staff report. In summary, the public does not have rights of access on private property, and the project has included the maintenance of the existing de -facto trail as a voluntary addition. The appellant also asserts significant degradation of visual resources. That issue was identified in the project EIR and analyzed at length. As described on pages 4.1-22 through 4.1.45, the impacts of the project on scenic vistas, particularly the vistas of Coral Mountain, cannot be mitigated to less than significant levels and will remain significant and unavoidable. As a result of this determination, Council determined, in the Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations attached to Resolution 2024-007 as Exhibit A, that the benefits of the project outweighed the significant impacts and justified certification of the EIR, in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15093. As noted above, the period to challenge the EIR has expired. The TTM and two SDPs do not change the location or height of the walls and fences analyzed in the EIR, and the findings contained in Resolution No. 2024-007 remain accurate and sufficient. No further environmental review of the applications is required pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, as no substantial changes to the project are proposed and there is no substantial new information regarding the project area. Environmental Impacts and Site Design: Section 2.E. of Attachment 1 asserts that the project will have significant impacts associated with "storm water management, water management, traffic circulation, grading, noise impacts, air quality impacts, impacts to wildlife and other ecological impacts." The appellant provides no facts in support of their assertion. As described above, the EIR thoroughly and comprehensively analyzed project impacts. Specifically, storm water impacts were addressed in Section 4.9 of the EIR; water management impacts in Section 4.9 and 4.15; traffic impacts in Section 4.13; noise impacts in Section 4.11; air quality in Section 4.2; and wildlife and ecology in Section 4.3. Also, as noted above, the period to challenge the EIR has expired. Impacts Associated with Lots U, R, V, and Golf Course Lot AD: Section 2.F. of Attachment 1 addresses impacts to specific lots within TTM 2025-0001. Lot U is a narrow open space lot between two residential lots on the east boundary of the site, about mid -way down the north -south axis of the map. Lot R is a parkway lot on the east side of Street A. Lot V is an open space lot between two residential lots at the southeast corner of the map. Lot AD is the southeastern part of the golf course. None of these lots will interfere with cultural resources, public access or existing water infrastructure. 229 Regarding coordination with other entities, as described above, the ACBCI has been very involved in the planning and implementation of protection measures related to archaeological resources. Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) was consulted by the City when the plans were received, as part of the City's standard application process, and CVWD provided a standardized response, which included the requirement that they would need to provide approval for water and sewer infrastructure. The Conditions of Approval for TTM 2025-0001 include a requirement that the applicant provide proof of approval by CVWD (Condition #4 of Exhibit A to Planning Commission Resolution 2025-012). CVWD has an access easement on the north end of the project, which extends into the Canterra development, which they have not exercised for either tract. As Council is aware, the easement allows CVWD to exercise its rights in the future, should they choose to do so. This access easement in no way impacts the viability of the project or the Canterra tract. The City does not control approval processes implemented by CVWD, but is responsible for assuring that the applicant conforms to those processes. By requiring proof of approval by CVWD, the City has correctly tasked the applicant with assuring approval by this outside agency. Cumulative Impacts — Travertine: Section 2.G. of Attachment 1 asserts that the approval of the Travertine project in conjunction with this project increase environmental and recreational impacts. As the comments relate to public access to private property, the issue has been addressed above in this staff report. As it relates to the appellant's assertion that there will be increased impacts to future homeowners from alluvial fan conditions, the impacts associated with soils and geology on the project site were thoroughly analyzed in Section 4.6 of the certified EIR, including impacts associated with soil stability. As noted above, the period to challenge the EIR has expired. Finally, the appellant's assertion that cumulative impacts have not been addressed is unsupported by substantial evidence. The EIRs for both the Coral Mountain and Travertine projects included cumulative impact analysis. That cumulative impact analysis is based on both the General Plan build -out and on known planned projects in compliance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15130. The Travertine project was known at the time that the EIR for the Coral Mountain was prepared, and the impacts of Travertine were factored into the analysis in the Coral Mountain EIR where applicable. As noted above, the period to challenge the EIR has expired. Impacts of Fugitive Dust: Section 2.H. of Attachment 1 asserts that a Fugitive Dust Control Plan has not been prepared. As stated in Condition of Approval 53.C. of Exhibit A to Planning Commission Resolution 2025-012, the plan is required prior to the issuance of grading permits. The plan must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer priorto the issuance of grading permits. The standards for the plan are established in the Municipal Code and the requirements of the SCAQMD, and will be adhered to for the project grading. Also, as noted above, the period to challenge the EIR has expired. It is important to note that the EIR extensively studied the impacts of site grading on air emissions, including PM10 and PM2.5. As shown in Table 4.2-6 on page 4.2-23 of the EIR, construction activities, including grading, will not exceed the SCAQMD thresholds of significance for PM10 or PM2.5. The EIR further analyzed the impacts to adjacent sensitive 230 receptors, including a location at the northwest corner of the project, at the Canterra subdivision. As described on pages 4.2-31 through 4.2-40, impacts will be less than significant. The City's and SCAQMD's requirements for fugitive dust control, as well as standard requirements for staging areas and stringent state emissions standards, will ensure that impacts to surrounding residential development will not exceed the established thresholds for air pollutants and dust. Also, as noted above, the period to challenge the EIR has expired. Public Safety and Infrastructure: Section 2.1. of Attachment 1 asserts increased and unaddressed impacts regarding traffic, infrastructure, increases in population of construction and maintenance workers, fire and emergency access, and public utility capacity. All of these issues were addressed in the certified EIR. Mitigation measures were provided where impacts were found to be significant, and all these impacts were determined to be less than significant. The project will implement temporary traffic management plans when necessary public improvements on Avenue 58 and Avenue 60 are undertaken. These plans are reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and the Fire Department prior to implementation and require that a throughway be maintained at all times when construction is underway. It is unclear how construction and maintenance workers would cause an impact on surrounding development, but the City requires that construction workers park on project staging areas within the development, not on perimeter streets. Supplemental Materials in Attachment 2: The supplemental materials do not raise any additional substantive issues associated with the appeal. The following provides a summary of new information/requests in Attachment 2. 1. The appellant requests a field visit with the applicant and stakeholders. City staff contacted the applicant and asked them to contact the appellant. It is staff's understanding that the appellant and applicant did speak at some length. To staff's knowledge, no change in the appellant's position or the applicant's applications has been made as a result of this discussion. 2. The appellant provides a list of previous actions taken by the City relating to the project. Section A of Attachment 2 restates the appellant's objection to the process, and their feeling that their individual concerns were not explicitly addressed by the Planning Commission. Section B of Attachment 2 repeats assertions regarding perceived inconsistencies with the General Plan. These have been addressed above in this staff report. The appellant also questions whether the project is residential or a resort, referring specifically to short-term vacation rentals. The Specific Plan and Development Agreement both allow short-term rentals on the property. No other resort amenities are proposed beyond those associated with the golf course and common area recreational amenities. The appellant also expresses concerns regarding the "look" of the project. As described to the Planning Commission at the public hearing, the project is being developed using multiple SDPs. The SDPs for the golf course and the perimeter landscaping were necessarily filed first, to allow 231 for the extended construction timeline required to construct the golf course. SDPs have also been submitted and are currently under review for the golf course structures (clubhouse, comfort stations, etc.) and the first model homes. Those will be brought forward to the Planning Commission for review when staff's review is complete. Staff's Conclusion Based on the analysis provided above, the Planning Commission considered TTM 2025- 0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002, and correctly determined that the findings for approval could be made. The issues raised in the appeal fail to show either a procedural or substantive error, nor do they point to a faulty review process. The City has undertaken its review of this project based on previous approvals and certified environmental documentation, and those approvals are sound. The current project results in reduced impacts when compared to those analyzed in the EIR, eitherforthe Preferred Alternative or Alternative 2. The currently proposed project implements the Specific Plan and is required to conform with all of the Mitigation Measures, including in the certified EIR. The Appeal does not provide substantial evidence that the project approvals should not stand. +.Rrni IMPAr_T Other than nominal costs to administer the Appeal, there is no fiscal impact to the City resulting from the Council's decision. PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE The public hearing notice for the appeal hearing was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 5, 2025, and distributed to properties within 500 feet of the site. At the time of publication of the Agenda, staff had received a letter from the applicant, see Attachment 6, and one written public comment, see Attachment 7. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Appeal is not considered a Project as defined by CEQA. The TTM and two SDPs were reviewed for consistency with CEQA, and the Planning Commission found that the certified EIR for the overall project (SCH #2021020310) had analyzed the impacts of the currently proposed project, and that no further analysis was required, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162. ALTERNATIVES Council may elect to (1) support the appeal, rescind the Planning Commission approval, and provide the Planning Commission with direction; or (2) continue the item and provide Staff with direction as to changes that it wishes to see implemented in the project. Prepared by: Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner Approved by: Jon McMillen, City Manager Attachments: 1. Appellant's Letter 232 2. Appellant's Supplemental Letter 3. Appellant Attachments 4. Planning Commission Staff Report & Attachments Link: https://www.laguintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/5193 4/638974197704370000 5. Planning Commission Resolution 2025-012 Link: https://Iaglaserweb.laguintaca.gov/WebLink/DocView.aspx?id=6 09945&dbid=1 &repo=CityofLaQuinta 6. Applicant's Response to Appeal 7. Public Comment 233 RESOLUTION 2025 - XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUSTAINING THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 & SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB) CASE NUMBERS: APPEAL 2025-0001 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001(TTM 39058) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 APPLICANT: CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT LLC APPELLANT: MARY MANN PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB WHEREAS, Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on October 28, 2025, adopted Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-012 approving applications by CM Wave Development LLC, property owner, for Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) to subdivide 384 acres into 204 residential lots and lots for streets, golf course and ancillary facilities; Site Development Permit 2025-0001 to allow the development of a golf course on the property; and Site Development Permit 2025- 0002 to allow the construction of a sales center within the project; located at the southwest corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street, more particularly described as: APNs: 764-840-021, 766-070-003, 766-070-006, 766-070-012, 766-070-014, 766-080- 001, 766-080-002, 766-080-004, 766-080-005, 764-210-007, 764-210-028 & 764-210- 029; and WHEREAS, pursuant to La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) Section 9.200.110 an appeal was filed by Mary Mann on November 7, 2025, of the Planning Commission decision to approve Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), Site Development Permit 2025-0001, and Site Development Permit 2025-0002, stating that the City should reverse the approval and deny or modify the applications; and WHEREAS, the main grounds for appeal are that the project will impact public enjoyment of open space; the approval did not consider impacts associated with air emissions, traffic, noise, and cultural resources; and the City did not properly provide public notice and access to documentation on the three applications; and WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on December 5, 2025, as prescribed by the 234 Resolution No. 2025-XXX Appeal 2025-0001 of Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058); Site Development Permit 2025-0001; Site Development Permit 2025-0002 Project: Coral Mountain Club Location: Southwest Corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 2 of 4 Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California did, on December 16, 2025, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider the appeal of the Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), Site Development Permit 2025-0001, and Site Development Permit 2025-0002; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21000 et eq. (CEQA) and implementing guidelines in California Code of Regulations Title 14, Section 15000 et seq. (CEQA Guidelines), the City Council certified the Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (EIR) (EA2019-0010 SCH #20211020310) for Alternative 2 on March 5, 2024, with Resolution 2024-007, and made Findings determining Overriding Considerations were necessary when considering the economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations associated with the project; and WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), Site Development Permit 2025-0001, and Site Development Permit 2025-0002 are consistent with said EIR, will result in reduced impacts associated with air quality, water resources, traffic, and noise, and will implement the Mitigation Measures included in the EIR to reduce significant impacts to less than significant levels; and WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), Site Development Permit 2025-0001, and Site Development Permit 2025-0002 allow the development of the site consistent with Specific Plan 2003-067, as amended by City Council Resolution 2024- 008 on March 5, 2024; and WHEREAS, the provision of fencing for Peninsular Bighorn Sheep is consistent with the City's responsibilities as a Permittee under the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan; and WHEREAS, the inclusion of the trail at the southwest quadrant of the property is consistent with the City Council's goal of supporting the Desert Recreation District in its efforts to create a system of trails and a visitor center in the future; and WHEREAS, in approving Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), Site Development Permit 2025-0001, and Site Development Permit 2025-0002, the Planning Commission reviewed the Specific Plan, the EIR, and the project materials, and made findings for approval consistent with the requirements of the Municipal Code and attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A; and 235 Resolution No. 2025-XXX Appeal 2025-0001 of Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058); Site Development Permit 2025-0001; Site Development Permit 2025-0002 Project: Coral Mountain Club Location: Southwest Corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 3 of 4 WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments for the appeal, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council affirms the Planning Commission's findings attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above Recitals are true and constitute the Findings of the City Council in this case. SECTION 2. That it does hereby sustain the Planning Commission's determination that Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), Site Development Permit 2025-0001, and Site Development Permit 2025-0002 do not require further review under CEQA pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162; and. SECTION 3. That pursuant to Sections 9.200.110, 9.210.010 and 13.12.140 of the LQMC, the City Council does hereby sustain Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025- 012, adopted on October 28, 2025, approving Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), Site Development Permit 2025-0001, and Site Development Permit 2025-0002, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the Conditions of Approval attached to Planning Commission Resolution 2025-012. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta City Council, held on December 16, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: LINDA EVANS, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 236 Resolution No. 2025-XXX Appeal 2025-0001 of Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058); Site Development Permit 2025-0001; Site Development Permit 2025-0002 Project: Coral Mountain Club Location: Southwest Corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street Adopted: December 16, 2025 Page 4 of 4 ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 237 RESOLUTION NO. 2025-XXX EXHIBIT A FINDINGS Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) 1. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan and Specific Plan 03-067, as amended, and implements the residential, golf course, and commercial uses allowed in those documents. 2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, with the implementation of recommended Conditions of Approval. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The mitigation measures included in the Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310) will reduce impacts to less than significant levels, and the reduction in residential lots proposed in the Tract Map will further reduce impacts associated with the project. 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as the map will be required to comply with all laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality, and other public health issues both in this Map and in subsequent site development permits and other approvals necessary for development of the land. 5. The site of the proposed subdivision is suitable for the density and type of development proposed. The reduction of units from the maximum allowed in the Specific Plan is suitable for the subject property. 6. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 13 of the City's Subdivision Regulations Code, minimum lot area requirements, and other applicable provisions of Title 9 of the City's Municipal Code, Subdivision Map Act and Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment No. 5. 7. The design and improvements required for the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All roadway improvements, easements, if any, and surrounding improvements will be completed to City and Specific Plan standards. Site Development Permit 2025-0001 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan 03-067, as amended, and furthers the goals of the Specific Plan to create a self- 238 contained high -quality community with golf amenities and services. The proposed golf course design reduces the golf course water consumption by creating desert - friendly buffer areas that will enhance the visual character of the site. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City's Zoning Code in terms of site plan and landscaping. The Site Development Permit is compliant with the Specific Plan and Zoning Code's development standards, including standards for setbacks and landscaping requirements. 3. The La Quinta Design and Development Department has determined that this project is consistent with the certified Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310), insofar as the Environmental Impact Report analyzed up to 750 residential units, a golf course, and a commercial corner. In this case, the project consists of a golf course on 182 of the 384 acres, consistent with what was previously analyzed. The project, as proposed, will reduce the effects and impacts analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report. 4. The layout of the golf course is compatible and complementary to surrounding development, which includes golf courses to the north, east, and south. 5. The site design of the project is compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The proposed golf course will be of high quality and will incorporate a desert -friendly plant palette which is sensitive to biological resources. 6. The proposed project implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Zoning Code. The landscape palette is consistent with the Specific Plan's and the City's drought -tolerant landscaping requirements. Site Development Permit 2025-0002 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan 03-067, as amended, and furthers the goals of the Specific Plan to create a self- contained high -quality community with golf amenities and services. The proposed sales center will provide a highly landscaped, low-lying location offering future residential land sales surrounded by perimeter landscaping and project walls. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City's Zoning Code in terms of site plan and landscaping. The Site Development Permit is compliant with the Specific Plan and Zoning Code's development standards, including standards for setbacks, building height, and landscaping requirements. 239 3. The La Quinta Design and Development Department has determined that this project is consistent with the certified Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report for the project (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310), insofar as the Environmental Impact Report analyzed up to 750 residential units, a golf course, and a commercial corner. In this case, the project consists of a sales center located on land which will be developed for neighborhood commercial use in the future, and the sales center is consistent with an office use permitted in the Specific Plan. The project, as proposed, will reduce the effects and impacts analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report. 4. The sales center is compatible and complementary to surrounding developments, insofar as it provides a garden -like setting, limited construction, and compatible design to the surrounding golf course communities. 5. The site design of the project is compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The proposed sales center provides a highly landscaped, low -impact development that will facilitate the sales of homes within a limited area of the Specific Plan. 6. The proposed project implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Zoning Code. The landscape palette is consistent with the Specific Plan's and City's drought -tolerant landscaping requirements, while the low -profile buildings and central courtyard facilitate low -impact development of the site. 240 ATTACHMENT 1 Mary Mann 80451 Palatine Court La Quinta CA 92553 maryhpmann@gmail.com 775-527-8963 Date: November 7, 2025 To: City Clerk City of La Quints 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Subject: Appeal of Approval — Tentative Tract Map (TTM2025-0001), Site Development Permit (SDP2025-0001 and SDP2025-0002) (Planning Commission Resolution 2025-X0Q) Dear City Clerk and Honorable Members of the La Quinta City Council, Pursuant to La Quinta Municipal Code §2.06.100 and §9.210.020, 1 hereby submit this formal appeal of the administrative decision/Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map TTM2025-0001 (TTM 39058), Site Development Permit SDP2025-0001, and Site Development Permit SDP2025-0002, which were approved on October 28, 2025 by La Quinta Planning Commission. 1. Standing as an Aggrieved Party I am an aggrieved person as defined by the La Quinta Municipal Code because I am directly affected by the approval of this project. My home is located adjacent to the proposed development site and I am materially impacted by the decision through: • Loss of access to open space • Acute exposure to blowing of dust <2-10 during undefined construction phase • Increased unqualified potential for circulation disruption due to construction traffic for an unquantified period of time >7 years • Disruption of family member commute along Madison at 60`s due to traffic build up at proposed maintenance facility and blowing dust • Increase in potential health problems such as asthma, bronchitis, and allergies due to dust exposure from construction activities over 350+ acres that disturb fine sediments that become airborne in frequent wind events 241 1OP rol� • Long term degradation to the sound environment and noise pollution especially in the early morning with single cars coming in from our east and south valley with workers who start up lawn mowers to work on landscaping • Degradation of air quality due to increased traffic, construction equipment, and environmental degradation due to introduction of toxic materials into the environment • Increased likelihood of health effects such as asthma, bronchitis, and allergies due to dust exposure to my now 5-year-old-son • Decreased quality of life for my son during his formative years living in a construction zone with all of the hazards (chemical exposure, large machinery), increased air pollution, noise pollution, dust, and restrictions to freedom of movement • Loss of a historic landmark that tells stories of California and local history and thereby opportunity (for anybody including me, my family and my neighbors) to experience Coral Mountain as an Open Space Area • Loss of major draw to why I chose to live in this location of La Quinta • Undefined limiting of my free circulation to and from open space recreation areas which I do on a daily basis • Loss of access to ingress and egress easement from my neighborhood • Safety risks due to limited ability to escape in case of fire and flood • Safety risk of inability for emergency personnel to access around property and fencing in case of fire, flood or other emergency • Potential for project to start and, due to financial or other concerns, be unable to complete project in timely manner, leaving a marred landscape, restricted access for many years. This would be a drain on property values and render City unable to rethink the property for a new purpose. 2. Basis for Appeal This appeal is based on the following grounds, which I believe constitute errors or oversights in the approval of the above -referenced applications. Each issue is identified with reference to relevant provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code, General Plan and California State Law to the extent currently known. Other grounds may exist this appeal and I reserve the right to amend the appeal to include those other grounds. A_ Procedural and Due Process Concerns The decision was made without adequate public notice and/or opportunity for affected residents to review the final plans prior to approval, contrary to LQMC §9.210.020(D). o Key word here is adequate. Though City contends that the legal mandate was met for public notice, it does not meet the standard of adequacy for a project of this size and complexity o Prior iteration of this project received much public outcry, comments include the complexity and inconsistency of the documents 242 444 o Amendment V to SP03-067 and EIR (EA 2019-0010, SCH #2021020310) contain inconsistencies between documents that requires more time for review and more critical analysis • Supporting materials, including staff reports and exhibits, not made available within the time required for meaningful review • My written comments —submitted to be read at the meeting —were instead presented by another individual, creating confusion and limiting the accuracy of public record testimony. • In requesting information from planning department to assist in review of materials related to this action the responses were inadequate and not completely forthcoming B. Inconsistency with General Plan and Zoning Requirements The project approval is inconsistent with the La Quinta General Plan including but not limited to the Land Use Element, including but not limited to policies regarding neighborhood character, open space preservation, and compatibility of scale and density. Approval of this large-scale, complex project without a comprehensive master plan for the Coral Mountain district constitutes piecemeal development inconsistent with LQMC §9.230.010(G), which requires findings of consistency and community compatibility. I urge the City to require completion of a true master plan for the Coral Mountain area before approving any phase of this or related developments. o Statements of General Plan alignment in approved EIR were vague and incomplete, particularly regarding Open Space, Historical Preservation, and economic viability and development o General plan amendments were needed for this project approval o Scale of project changed dramatically between description in SP SP03-067 and the tract map presented o Previous plan (Preferred Alternative) included much more open space designation o Potential for project to start and, due to financial or other concerns, be unable to complete project in timely manner, leaving a marred landscape, restricted access for many years. This would be a drain on property values and render City unable to rethink the property for a new purpose o La Quinta General Plan is set to be amended for 2035. Planning for this will begin within the timeframe of this development. Given the key location of this property and complexity of the land uses, circulation, property rights, easements for water, increase in population, and uncertainty regarding the IID electric service, shouldn't a new land use plan be considered? o City should consider reevaluating this property as part of a Coral Mountain district that would align the varied current uses of this property with surrounding landowners A General Plan land use designations for this property as golf course and low density housing came from "color blobs" drawn on a map that was adopted when this area was annexed into La Quinta > 220 years ago. A general plan amendment in March 2024 was needed to move those "color blobs around" for this iteration of the project 243 3 A q Af-^ o This project is a cut-off portion of a project that encompassed a much larger area and portions of that have been developed (Trilogy, Andalusia). This property is recently under new ownership and the original concept of this project was to divorce the property from the Andalusia Plan, which never occurred. As part of this, the applicant prepared a new Specific Plan that radically changed the land use designations and a General Plan Amendment was applied for as part of the subsequently rejected project. Thus there are parts of this almost 30 year old plan that make no sense. o The current TTM with 250 lots and stated potential for —300 units is much different from the 750 units approved earlier. This change calls for further study and analysis as to how this development aligns with policies regarding neighborhood character, open space preservation, and compatibility of scale and density. This would include investigation of monetary benefits/risk to City including income expected in the form of mitigation tax of $1000 a unit per year and TOT. The project does not fully comply with applicable zoning and design standards under LQMC Title 9 (Zoning Code) o Dividing the parcel into 7 lots "for financing purposes" was never fully explained nor were the implications for land use. Those boundaries are not explained or acknowledged in staff report so I am unable to evaluate. C. Impacts to Cultural, Archaeological, and Tribal Resources • The project's perimeter wall and initial golf course construction will directly impact identified archaeological and cultural resources, including sites identified as containing tribal and historic artifacts and unique geologic features. I have communicated with the planning department regarding these issues and have been denied access to sources of information related to the identified ESAs and archaeological plan. These plans need to be coordinated with the fence alignment prior to adoption of these maps and plans. • To allow for a public trail the line of the perimeter fence on west side as shown would require the trail over the sensitive rocky area. This the fence line and trail directly impacts a Unique Geologic Feature, Cultural and Historical resources that are currently visited by 1 Os-100 visitors a week. This was not considered in the underlying EIR. Further Environmental Assessment is needed to determine a way for intended development to proceed while respecting the existing environment and many community resources it provides • These actions are inconsistent with LQMC §9.110.070 (Hillside Development Standards) and General Plan Policy LU-10.2, which require preservation and sensitive integration of cultural resources into development plans. • These actions are also Contrary to Municipal Code Title 7 on historic preservation. • No sufficient mitigation measures or tribal consultations appear to have been conducted for this first phase contrary to CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5 and Assembly Bill 52 requirements. This will be directly impacting these resources, and already has with application of spray paint on tufa. D. Environmental, Recreational, and Visual Resource Impacts 244 lw-r" • The Coral Mountain area is already widely used for recreation, hiking, and exploration. The project's proposed fencing and walling will sever public access to adjacent federal lands, contrary to General Plan Policy OS-3., which mandates maintaining public access to open space and natural resources. • The perimeter wall and golf course grading will significantly degrade visual resources, obstructing the historic shoreline and mountain views, among the last intact examples of La Quinta's natural landscape. • Approval of this first phase without adequate environmental analysis under LQMC Section 9.10.010 and CEQA creates an irreversible loss of scenic, ecological, and cultural values. E. Environmental and Site Design Issues Finding 4 in attachment 3 of the Planning Commission Public Hearing Agenda packet, is not an accurate statement, there are potential serious health and safety risks associated with the implementation of this plan The approval did not adequately address potential environmental impacts under LQMC Chapter 9.150 and CEQA, particularly regarding storm water management, traffic circulation, grading, noise impacts, air quality impacts, impacts to wildlife and other ecological impacts. F. Site -Specific Impacts — Lots U, R, V and GC lot AD (TTM2025-0001) • On TTM Lots U, R, and V, the proposed development will directly affect areas known to contain sensitive cultural resources, public access corridors, and existing water infrastructure. • No plans have been made available —or discussed publicly —regarding agreements or coordination with other affected entities, including the local Tribe, Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), and adjoining public landowners. • The status of agreements with CVWD regarding water supply, maintenance access, and infrastructure protection remains unclear, and no assessment of the perimeter boundary fence impacts on these areas has been disclosed. • These omissions raise serious procedural and substantive deficiencies in the City's review and approval of the Tentative Tract Map and Development plans, requiring further agency consultation and environmental assessment before construction commences. C. Cumulative and Regional Impacts — Travertine Development Concurrent approvals for the Travertine development south of the levee compound the environmental and recreational impacts of Coral Mountain. The City's special directors meeting earlier this week addressed approvals essential to advancing Travertine, which —combined with Coral Mountain —will further restrict recreation and access, while increasing risk to future homeowners due to active alluvial fan conditions. 245 5j:) "ri • Cumulative risks have not been properly analyzed in a combined or regional context, as required by CEQA Guidelines Sections 15130 and 15065. H. Dust Control • It does not appear that the developer has provided a Fugitive Dust Control Plan as required by LQMC Section 6.16. Because of the large acreage to be disturbed, Combined with the indeterminate construction timeline approval this key piece should be completed before approval of development plans. This plan should conform to current SCAQMD current Best Management Practices for monitoring and mitigation I. Public Safety and Infrastructure Concerns • The project will increase vehicular traffic, infrastructure burdens, increased population of construction and maintenance workers without clear mitigation measures • Fire access, emergency response routes, and public utility capacity may not comply with City standards. • Safety risk of inability for emergency personnel to access around property and fencing in case of fire flood or other emergency 3. Requested Action I respectfully request that the City Council accept this appeal for hearing, stay the implementation of the approvals pending review, and ultimately revoke or modify the approval ofTTM2025-0001, SDP2025-0001, and SDP2025-0002 to ensure full compliance with the La Quinta Municipal Code, General Plan and California State Law. Separate findings must be made for the TTM and each SDP, demonstrating: • Consistency with the General Plan & Specific Plan • Consistency with the Coral Mountain Specific Plan EIR • Consistency with Development Standards. 4. Attachments • N/A 5. Certification 246 I declare under penalty of perjury that the information contained herein is true and correct to the best of my ledge. Signature: Name (printed): 0' Date: �O� �q� ma's 247 � r� ATTACHMENT 2 Supplemental Items to Consider for Appeal 2025-0001: Overall theme of Basis for Appeal and request for City Council to revoke or modify the approval of TTM2025-0001, SDP2025-0001, and SDP2025-0002 related to the Club at Coral Mountain development 1) The approval of TTM2025-0001, SDP2025-0001, and SDP2025-0002 by the planning commission does not adequately protect the geological, archaeological, historical and recreational components of Coral Mountain and its surrounding areas. These are key assets within City limits, but of local and regional importance, decisions of this magnitude on this key property are far reaching. City should verify agreements with CVWD, IID, Tribes, County of Riverside, and these agreements should be made public. Input from surrounding stakeholders should be considered and disclosed. The proposed project not does not protect the rights of the public to access and utilize the recreational and historical components of the Coral Mountain area. Prior approvals did not adequately identify or discuss the long term strategy for management of these shared assets. 2)The approvalTTM2025-0001, SDP2025-0001, and SDP2025-0002 bythe planning commission does not adequately protect the interests of the residents of La Quinta with respect to: • Health and safety risks created by the construction; • Longterm health and safety risks during development operations; • Traffic and circulation; • Ongoing financial obligations; • Infrastructure obligations; • Increases in utility rates; • Water security; • Making steps toward becoming a sustainable community Attachments Note that my intention was that attachments were not required because the background and backup for the Appeal are included the record of the Public Hearing ittps://www.laquintaca.gov/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/16295/109?togg le=allpast , which includes the meeting recording, the TTM and development plans, staff report, references to all the background documents (EIR, development agreement and specific plan amendment, https://www.laquintaca.gov/our-city/city-departments/design- 248 and-development/planning-division/planning-projects/club-at-coral-mountain ), public comments, and my written comments with references to earlier public comments in both planning and city council since May 21 (these were in open comment periods the hearing on Oct. 28 was first time this project was on an Agenda). There is also a written public comment from me on this matter at the Nov. 4 CC meeting that request an appeal or'call up' from City Council. This appeal references any and all documents created or referred to by the developer or the City in reference to the proposed development that is part of their record. I will try to supplement this with uploads to the HUB for this appeal 2015-0001 with other relevant documents and communications on this matter in the brief timeline allowed for preparation of this appeal. Field Visit Request A field visit with the applicant and any of the stakeholders would really help clarify some of the issues mentioned and assist in preparation for a hearing on the matter. This would assist perhaps to resolve conflicts in advance and/or and answer questions on what is planned. As part of the hearing process I request a site visit with all parties present. Table of Referenced Decisions -References in my statements to previous approvals, include the meeting dates and items considered for some of the decisions on this project. Because of inadequate review of previous agreements, comments, changes now requires higher level of scrutiny on the implementation of the plan. Table provided for reference, it is not complete. Date Project considered Items Body A/D March 5, 2024 Club at Coral Mt Environmental City Council Approved Assessment 2019-0010, General Plan Amendment 2023-1000, Zone Change 2023- 1000, Specific plan Amendment 2023-003 (SP2003-067, Amendment V), TTM 2023-0005, Development Agreement 2023- 1000 249 Jan 23, 2024 Club at Coral Mt Environmental Planning Approved Assessment Commission 2019-0010, General Plan Amendment 2023-1000, Zone Change 2023- 1000, Specific plan Amendment 2023-003 (SP2003-067, Amendment V), TTM 2023-0005, Development Agreement 2023- 1000 September21, Wave ADOPT Denial 2022 RESOLUTIONS TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0010 AND APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2019-0003 (AMENDMENT V TO ANDALUSIA SPECIFIC PLAN), GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2019- 0002, ZONE CHANGE 2019- 0004, SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0002, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005; INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCES APPROVING ZONECHANGE 2019-0004 AN D 250 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0002; CEQA: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2021020310); LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 58, NORTH OF AVENUE 60, AND EAST AND WEST OF MADISON STREET The following comments supplement the comments in the original appeal document. A. Procedural and Due Process Concerns As clarification for statement in appeal regarding public comments. I was very appreciative of the comments being read, that was not expected, and I was grateful for that neighbor. My objection is that despite having received evidence to the contrary of staff findings in my and others written and oral comments, the comments of others at the public hearing (and from me to both Planning Commission and Council since May), no discussion acknowledgement, appeasement or refutation was offered to many of the issues presented. Additional procedural concern: The number of complex items considered in one public hearing process is overwhelming and does not allow for adequate review and understanding of each item. One Planning Commissionor was absent from hearing B. Inconsistency with General Plan and Zoning Requirements • The discussion at the Planning commission approval on Oct 28 did not provide any enlightenment on the details of the project that were left open-ended in the approved specific plan, EIR and development agreement. 251 • Please show consistency with the development agreement, and any changes to the development that were considered as part of this review. • Does this project reflected in TTM and development plans still reflect the intent of the Andalusia Specific Plan (and General Plan)? Or is this more of a resort (short term occupancy) setting? • Presentation by Applicant regarding the Club at Coral Mountain Plan is incomplete no specifics are given what this development will look like or how it will be used. There were claims in hearing regarding club members' use of golf course for other recreation activities, no mention of the recreational lake except through public comment, only after the vote Commissioner Nieto told applicant there was confusion around the overall picture of the project. There was significant uncertainty on how the development will operate. Neither the presentation and discussion at 28 Oct. hearing, nor the previous meetings provide any clarity of the intent of this development. As of 18 Nov. 2025 Applicant Meriwether has not changed their website for this project to show new development concept with golf course, recreational lake, and many fewer residences. The website includes one picture of Wave imprinted on Coral Mountain and various generic images of people playing yard games, golfing at sunrise(set),and a drawing of racket courts. To date, Applicant has not shown the specific development concept for this residential golf course plan. Because none of this was determined in previous stages, it should be demanded prior to accepting the TTM and development plans. 252 https://meriwetherco.com/meriwether-portfolio/coral-mountain/ Coral Mountain La Quinta, CA M O Uti Coral Mountain is a new approach to resort development, focused on demand for an experiential, active. P� T,9A and engaged lifestyle. �O� Y Located in La Quinta CA in the eastern quadrant of the Coachella Valley, Coral Mountain is a 400-acre M id land parcel acquired by Meriwether Companies in m-2019. The site is one of the last remaining large land r Q pOrCfIS in the Coachella Volley. With Views Of the Surrounding Santa ROSO mountain range, the site ObUIS 2 Coral Mountain - a name derived from an ancient seabed and resulting fossilaed seashells and visible water lines found on the property. Development plans for the property include a private residential community, anchored by a David MCLay Kidd tlesignetl gall course Beyond golf, the club at Coral Mountain will feature cutting edge wellness, bike 6 skate amenities, social programming, racquet sports, and guided access to vast recreation areas. Property Details Type: Resort Residential Master Plan Status: Current Project Engagement: Sponsor This extraordinary piece of land and this setting are truly unique and we are excited to explore the possibilities of what Coral Mountain will become." https://meriwetherco.com/about-us/ Our real estate developments seek to marry intelligent planning and design with unique amenities centered around outdoor activities, wellness and shared communities. OUR AMENITIES OUR PRODUCTS Value statements from the applicant website indicates reverence forth e natural environment and matching a development to its surroundings. This matches La Quinta's value statements, but do not seem to be mimicked through the Club at Coral Mt. Plan. It should also be noted that Meriwether focus is on "hospitality" assets. 253 • Taxes -heard that our property taxes and those of this development are wholly given to Riverside County for some years due a Bond agreement after annexation of this area of La Quinta (extension S and E from original boundaries). I have not had time to figure out when this happened or what exactly was annexed, City was Incorporated in 1982-coral Mt was not part of original City. Given this, shouldn't the correct lead agency for the CEQA analysis be Riverside County, or at least they should have been a consulted agency with review rights? This seems especially true given the complexity and size of the project. C. Impacts to Cultural, Archaeological, and Tribal Resources • Alignment of western boundary fence it is way too close to the mountain and it's special features and does not allow for public access through and around that is not impacting those features. Further, the fence (and trail) will be on an unstable slope that will require constant maintenance, increasing traffic and work required around sensitive features • Trail alignment is too close to golf hole 14 which would put trail users at risk. • Hole is to tee off into a toe of the mountain and will be frequently impacted by golf balls in the area that is marked as an ESA • Coral Mountain is a sacred well known landmark that contains the coolest features left of our archaeological and natural history. Impacts to the identified as ESA on the private property impact the whole thing. • The proposed trail is not wide enough, not in the right spot and they have not provided an easement or shown the agreements with CVWD and BOR that a public trail will continue to be allowed through this area. • Rock Art Plan is not yet available -Tribal statement required • Agricultural tiles and drainage system from past uses will be destroyed- a historic artifact speaking to the agricultural history of the Valley D. Environmental, Recreational, and Visual Resource Impacts • Fence alignment on the west side, which is claimed to be mandated by the `forest service', but involves several stakeholders. In the approved documents the alignment of the fence (and trail) was left open. But nothing has changed from the proposed alignment, nor any discussion presented on the options considered. • No letters of support or comments on the fence plan were solicited or provided from the stakeholder agencies and or groups requesting the fence. • The proposed trail is not wide enough, not in the right spot and they have not provided an easement 254 • Public Easement to be recorded has not been identified in TTM • CVWD and BOR have not provided comments regarding this plan, though the plan prosed implies that there is a plan for continued use of this area as a public trail. • No comments provided from Desert Recreation District F. Site -Specific Impacts Based on applicant statement the phasing sequence may change based on market conditions — how does this guarantee orderly development as noted in staff findings? Lake- Amount of material to be moved, source of water, when would be in construction schedule, justification as needed for success of development The fence alignment (and trail) as shown will be on an unstable slope that will require constant maintenance, increasing traffic and work required impacting community OW8111040169 G. Cumulative and Regional Impacts • There are at least three projects consisting of hundreds of acres and decades long construction timelines for housing/lodging/golf projects planned to start in in next 1-2 years in City Limits. Plus a 111 redesign project (our main commercial corridor) How is the city planning to manage these projects? Who will be managing the implementation of complex mitigation plans, construction oversight, permits, infrastructure requirements, site monitoring, etc? Payment of fees by developers is not sufficient to cover additional workload required. Probability of outside personnel or developer personnel unfamiliar with the projects engaged and put into a position of enforcement/approval recommendations with limited knowledge of the each of project's complex agreements and schedules. Inability to process the smaller projects with any expediency and rushed or inaccurate findings for the larger projects. • Project of this size must consider its impacts beyond the project boundary, changes to the use and direction on this site is directly impacting more and more neighbors. 255 How many developments surround Coral Mountain on 58th, Madison and 60th? _L 1 Coral Mountain by Alta Verde Santa Rosa Trails Desert — Sotheby's International Realty Cantera at Coral Mountain Andalusia Santerra Lisa Castro — private residence Puerta Azul Coral Mountain at PGA West Palo Verde Toll Brothers Stone Creek The Quarry Trilogy Lions Gate Guillermo Cassilas — private residence PGA West Legends Residential Figure 1: Most of these are newer developments, and this is an incomplete list. This was found in Public comments opposed to this development as evidence to further assess the impacts for traffic, noise, light and air pollution prior to approval. This was not discussed in prior approvals for this project. • The boundaries and access points to our public lands and open spaces have been consistently cut off along the boundary with the mountains to the west. This project further restricts access and blocks or destroys natural wildlife corridors connecting the mountains to the valley below. The size of this development and as one of the last large parcels with mountain adjacency, the cumulative impacts to our open space, recreational opportunities and access must be considered. • TTM and Development plan review should have included comments from affected agencies at a minimum. These are not present in the Final EIR that was approved by City Council in March 2024 (EIR considering Alternative 2 (the Andalusia residential golf course entitlements). The EIR was not recirculated for reconsideration of Alternative 2 and statements in staff report from this meeting, provided as to why not recirculated in staff report are weak). The same EIR for the new plan for golf course residential at the site was certified in same meeting with a General Plan Amendment, a Zone Change, A Tentative Tract Map, and the Development Agreement). The previous action on the Project was in September 2022 when the 'Preferred Alternative' under the EIR was denied. (This was the Wave Project that had a separate Specific Plan from the Andalusia project. At that meeting the City Council voted against: Wave 256 Development Agreement, the Wave Tract Map and the Wave Specific Plan, the EIR was not acted upon at that meeting in Sept 2022) 1 am coming to understand that the City did not adequately analyze this Project for CEQA, and may be unqualified as lead agency. • Critical Water Infrastructure Impacted by this development. At a minimum comments letters of support should be presented from CVWD, Bureau of Reclamation and County of Riverside: o Lake Cahuilla Reservoir o Canal o Buried water Pipeline and related above ground water conveyance structures (pipeline headed east to for agriculture, golf courses, and communities) o Groundwater replenishment facility adjacency • Critical Stormwater infrastructure o Levees on S and W of project-built—1930s? owned by BOR maintained by CVWD-these were built to protect us from stormwater events (Hurricane Hilary was in 2023) where there is high potential for large amounts of water, sediment (clay, sand, gravel, up to large boulders depending on size of storm) o Current use as walking path/biking/horseback riding —This is current use but there needs to be an agreement with CVWD/BOR that the multi -use trail will be continued to be allowed because there will be a lot of people looking for this amenity o Access for maintenance, emergency access, risks to life and property in case of failure • Circulation o Concerns at Avenue 60 side of development were discussed but not resolved in hearing. Promises that this is going to get figured out, or residents will live with it, but no steps toward planning have been made public 0 58th dead ends to west into at Quarry or Park. There will be increased traffic from this development and increased use of Lake Cahuilla Veterans Regional Park. Traffic consideration was not given to Avenue 58 was not analyzed, but increased population and commercial corner will increase traffic. There is only one way out in this flood prone area 257 • Complex web of private and public interests/landholders, rights of way not fully described or considered in TTM and plans submitted • Cost/Risk and Benefit analysis was not presented for this development by the applicant or the City. i.e. what to do with all these new residents and visitors? Parks and open space is a big draw that is not prioritized in this development. 258 11/19/25, 9:05 PM Plans for 1,200 homes, 100-villa resort approved in La Quinta ATTACHMENT 3 Desert Sun. 259 https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/la-quinta/2024/08/08/plans-for-1200-homes-100-villa-resort-approved-in-la-quinta/74680270007/ 1/6 11/19/25, 9:05 PM Plans for 1,200 homes, 100-villa resort approved in La Quinta Desert Sun. in south La Quinta approved by city council Tom Coulter Palm Springs Desert Sun Aug. 8, 2024, 7:01 a.m. PT A proposal to allow as many as 1,20o homes and a loo-room resort on a large swath of land in south La Quinta gained approval from the city council Tuesday, despite some concerns from neighboring residents about a key access road into the site. Known as Travertine, the project covers roughly 855 acres of land south of Coral Mountain and west of the Trilogy community. While its initial plans gained approval in 1995, the revised proposal calls for far fewer homes, along with a four - hole golf training facility instead of two golf courses. One part of the proposal — an elevated road over a berm along Avenue 62 that would serve as the main entrance — drew scrutiny at the meeting, mostly from residents of the adjacent Trilogy community. While not opposed to the project overall, they said the road will cause noisy disturbances in their area, as well as lighting and air quality issues. What's included in the Travertine project? Just over a third of the Travertine property will be kept as open natural space, rather than for the pair of golf courses included under the previous plan. Golfers will still have access to a training facility with four holes, a driving range, teaching areas and a banquet facility. The too -villa wellness resort, which is planned on the northern end of Travertine, is slated to be built after the initial round of homes. Homes at Travertine will be sold at market -rate prices and are allowed as short-term vacation rentals. 260 https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/la-quinta/2024/08/08/plans-for-1200-homes-100-villa-resort-approved-in-la-quinta/74680270007/ 2/6 11/19/25, 9:05 PM Plans for 1,200 homes, 100-villa resort approved in La Quinta Desert Sun. -"JJ• Mark Rogers, a developer with TRG Land, said the 1995 project, which allowed for Up to 2,30o homes, a 5oo-room hotel, two golf courses and a tennis club, was "just a whisper away" from being built. He noted the estimated car traffic from the new plan was substantially less than under the prior one. The proj ect's trail system features a roughly five -mile loop around the development and other connector pathways, with the developer working to connect them to the nearby Boo Hoff Trail. It also includes an eight -foot perimeter fence to prevent peninsular bighorn sheep from entering the community. Rogers said his team will contribute to public safety costs and expanded power and water capacity in the area, adding they're offering "the next step of infrastructure that will allow the city to expand east" into its sphere of influence. Main entrance for Travertine at issue During its initial phases, the main access point into Travertine will be on Avenue 62, while an emergency vehicle access road is planned to connect with Madison Street. Many Trilogy residents pushed for an alternative as the main option: An extension of Jefferson Street running south from Avenue 58 and connecting to the site's northwest corner. But Rogers said the planned extension is "long in the future" due to regulatory approvals and entitlements that the owner of Coral Canyon — a residential development planned on Coral Mountain's west side — still needs to obtain. (Rogers also said the current landowner of Coral Canyon wants to sell the property.) 261 https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/la-quinta/2024/08/08/plans-for-1200-homes-100-villa-resort-approved-in-la-quinta/74680270007/ 3/6 11/19/25, 9:05 PM Plans for 1,200 homes, 100-villa resort approved in La Quinta Desert Sun. Still, several residents contested the main entrance — an elevated roadway at Avenue 62 atop a 3o-foot berm — and raised concerns related to noise, light and air pollution from the passing cars. "This elevated, freeway -like roadway hovering 36 feet in the air will be built in close proximity to the existing Trilogy residential neighborhood," resident Robert Lasser told the council. "Nothing like this exists in any residential area, anywhere in the Coachella Valley. This type of elevated roadway does not belong in this location." Mark Reider, board president of Trilogy's homeowners association, said the vast majority of residents were opposed to the primary access point planned for Travertine, and urged the council to instead require the Jefferson Street extension as the main road. "In our opinion, developers' costs of a project should not be a consideration on making land use decisions," Reider said. "It should be what's in the best interest of the entire La Quinta community, and using Avenue 62 appears to us to simply be the path of least resistance for the developer." The La Quinta City Council weighs in The council ultimately agreed to green -light Travertine, with multiple members commending its overall design and its environmental approach. Councilmember Kathleen Fitzpatrick called the vote a "tough decision," but she noted that nobody had spoken out against the overall project. "(This project) is not like the wave park," she said, referring to a proposal on the other side of Coral Mountain that the council rejected in 2022. "It's not in contradiction to what our development goals are, what our design standards are for the city of La Quinta." 262 https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/la-quinta/2024/08/08/plans-for-1200-homes-100-villa-resort-approved-in-la-quinta/74680270007/ 4/6 11/19/25, 9:05 PM Plans for 1,200 homes, 100-villa resort approved in La Quinta Desert Sun. Councilmember Steve Sanchez said it's always hard when a new development is proposed for vacant land, "but I try to always remind everybody that we all live in an area that at one time was just land." "PGA West, Trilogy, wherever it is, at one time, was just land, and somebody had to develop it," Sanchez said. He also commended the developer for setting aside hundreds of acres as open space in Travertine. The council approved plans for Travertine by a 4-0 vote, with Mayor Linda Evans absent. (Evans was present for part of the meeting, then attended the Desert Healthcare District's board meeting Tuesday in her role as chief strategy officer for community advocacy at Desert Care Network.) More: Coral Mountain project in La Quinta gains council approval, minus controversial wave basin Several housing developments in the works in La Quinta Travertine is the third large housing proposal recently approved in the city. A development known as the Club at Coral Mountain — located just north of Travertine — is set to include 75o homes, an 18-hole golf course and a io-acre recreation lake on land off Avenue 58 and Madison Street. The council supported the plan in March after rejecting a prior proposal that included a hotly debated wave basin. A 252-unit apartment complex at the northeast corner of Washington Street and Avenue 50 was also approved by the council last fall, following months of meetings and revisions in response to pushback from neighboring residents. Tom Coulter covers the cities of Palm Desert, La Quinta, Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells. Reach him at thomas.coulter@desertsun.com. 263 https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/la-quinta/2024/08/08/plans-for-1200-homes-100-villa-resort-approved-in-la-quinta/74680270007/ 5/6 11/19/25, 9:05 PM Plans for 1,200 homes, 100-villa resort approved in La Quinta Desert Sun. 264 https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/la-quinta/2024/08/08/plans-for-1200-homes-100-villa-resort-approved-in-la-quinta/74680270007/ 6/6 11/19/25, 9:04 PM La Quinta City Council rejects Coral Mountain Resort project Desert Sun. La Quinta City Council unanimously rejects Coral Mountain Resort project, wave pool ,a Tom Coulter Palm Springs Desert Sun Sept. 21, 2022 th-4 2022, 5:58 p.m. PT Plans for a large development in La Quinta that would include hundreds of houses, a hotel and a high-tech surf wave basin — a centerpiece that's drawn strong opposition from some residents and climate experts — were unanimously rejected by the city council Wednesday night following a lengthy meeting in a room packed with both opponents and supporters of the project. The vote marks a major defeat for the current plans for Coral Mountain Resort, a roughly $200 million private development mapped for 386 acres of vacant land on the southwest corner of 58th Avenue and Madison Street. The La Quinta City Council held several hearings on the proposal in recent months, and delayed a decision on the project in July to give the developer more time to address residential concerns, particularly water usage for the centerpiece wave basin. The council heard more about those concerns — as well as the developer's rebuttals — during its meeting Wednesday. Ultimately, all five members declined to advance the proposal, which included zoning and general plan changes to allow for the hotel and wave pool, arguing the developer's request did not meet the "higher threshold" to warrant such substantial changes. "What I see is a developer that hasn't pushed the weight above their head," councilmember Robert Radi said, using a sports analogy. "I don't see how I can support the change in the general plan ... I can only conclude that the project is not consistent with the fundamentals of the land use and the use of resources as per the general plan." 265 https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/la-quinta/2022/09/21/1a-quinta-city-council-rejects-coral-mountain-resort-project-5-0-vote/10425977002/ 1/5 11/19/25, 9:04 PM La Quinta City Council rejects Coral Mountain Resort project Recent hearings over the development have lasted several hours, as many locals — including members of the group "La Quinta Residents for Responsible Development" — have spoken against the proposal, which was narrowly advanced by the city's planning commission in April. Their concerns have largely centered on whether the wave basin would be an appropriate use of water amid a historic drought across California that experts say has been fueled by climate change. But about half of the people at the packed -house meeting were supportive of the project, with several people wearing t-shirts that stated "ON BOARD: CORAL MOUNTAIN" across the front. One of the proponents donning a shirt, Danilo Kawasaki, told the council he was speaking on behalf of more than 16o La Quinta residents who wrote a letter in support of the development. He also recalled visiting the Surf Ranch near Fresno, the only spot already using the wave technology from champion surfer Kelly Slater that would be used at Coral Mountain. "I'm not a surfer. I went on vacation with my kids, but I have to say it was one of the best days of my life," Kawasaki said. "I was able to catch waves, I was able to have fun, my kids enjoyed it.... For people like me with young kids, young families, I think this is going to be a great attraction to La Quinta." Wednesday's meeting was more than two years after plans for the project were first announced in 202o by Meriwether Companies and Big Sky Wave Developments, who teamed up as CM Wave Development LLC to buy the land. The plans includes zoning changes to allow a hotel with 15o rooms, and all homes on the development would be allowed to operate as short-term rentals. The development would bring "the largest, rideable open -barrel, human -made wave in the world" to La Quinta by using Slater's wave technology, according to a statement announcing the project in February 2020. The final proposal included a 16.7-acre wave basin, and developers recently reduced its water surface to 12 acres, after initial plans called for a basin covering 20 acres. 266 https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/la-quinta/2022/09/21/la-quinta-city-council-rejects-coral-mountain-resort-project-5-0-vote/10425977002/ 2/5 11/19/25, 9:04 PM La Quinta City Council rejects Coral Mountain Resort project The Coachella Valley Water District has said it has adequate supply to serve the project "without substantially decreasing groundwater supplies," according to the environmental impact report. Coral Mountain Resort would use more than goo acre-feet of water per year, with about 13% of that usage coming from the wave basin. An acre-foot is about 326,000 gallons, or enough to serve at least two households for a year. Those leading the project have tried to ease neighbors' concerns which also include the potential for noise and light pollution in areas surrounding the wave resort, well in advance of Wednesday's meeting. Last fall, the developer hosted a live demonstration of how light would impact the area at night, though it left some residents unconvinced. Recently, after asking the council to delay its decision in July, the developer announced several changes to the plan in response to concerns. The changes include reducing the size of the main wave basin, reducing the height of the lighting poles around the basin from 8o to 40 feet (that change also increases the number of light poles from 18 to 55), reducing the maximum height of buildings by five feet and a moratorium on any special events at the resort for its first two years. The developers have also offered to add a new 0.25% transfer tax on the resale of all homes within the project to support health and social programs in the area, donate at least 1,000 surf hours per year for charitable uses and contribute $1.5 million to a turf -reduction program in the La Quinta area. James Vaughn, an attorney representing the Coral Mountain developers, ran through all of the new benefits offered by the project's backers, noting the tax revenue it would bring the city through the plan's short-term rentals, as well as the other funding for local community programs and upgrades to a nearby substation. "The project protects the environment and enhances water conservation (through the turf rebate program)," Vaughn said. "The project has no impact on the quality of life or the surrounding residents." "When you balance the project's benefits against any negative effects, it's not even close," he added. "This project is a clear winner for the city and for its residents." But the proposed benefits ultimately didn't move the needle for members of the council. Mayor Linda Evans said the public benefits were "too little, too late" in changing theRublic 2 https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/la-quinta/2022/09/21/la-quinta-city-council-rejects-coral-mountain-resort-project-5-0-vote/10425977002/ 3/5 11/19/25, 9:04 PM La Quinta City Council rejects Coral Mountain Resort project perception on the project. Others at the meeting pushed back strongly against the developer's notion that the project promotes water conservation. Local resident Laura Dolata questioned how the project could be allowed to proceed as California residents are being asked to conserve water amid a historic statewide drought. "We're at a point in history where we cannot be freely wasteful of water," Dolata said. "While the rest of the world is screaming about water conservation, including all the experts and scientists, the federal and state governments, the developers say, `No problem, we have plenty of water' — yet the rest of us who live here must conserve and reduce our water usage and will in fact be penalized for overuse." Dolata also argued changing the area's zone to include tourist commercial zoning — which would allow for the 150-room hotel, wave basin and other resort amenities — would be unfair to nearby neighbors, calling such a move "completely contradictory to the whole concept of why zoning laws exist in the first place." Her comments on the proposed zoning changes were echoed by other residents, including one who said such a move would be a "breach of trust" by the council against its constituents. In their initial presentation, the project's developers noted similar developments — with tourist commercial zones in close proximity to residential areas — exist in other parts of the city, pointing to the La Quinta Resort and the Rancho La Quinta Country Club as examples. A 750-home community with 18-hole golf course was previously approved for the Coral Mountain development. But supporters of the project argued the valley has more than enough golf courses, while the wave pool would offer a new attraction to younger people in the area. The development project also had the support of the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce, as well as the Southern California Builders Association. Joe Hammer, who has properties in La Quinta and the nearby Vista Santa Rosa area, encouraged the council to approve the project, arguing it would set the course for future development in the city. "We have to look in the future -- This is not just one project," Hammer said. "Other developers are looking at us ... (If) La Quinta is not open for business, I know where they're going: right across the street from where I'm at, which is Vista Santa Rosa." 268 https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/la-quinta/2022/09/21/la-quinta-city-council-rejects-coral-mountain-resort-project-5-0-vote/10425977002/ 4/5 11/19/25, 9:04 PM La Quinta City Council rejects Coral Mountain Resort project However, the council ultimately decided against advancing the development, despite some admitting the wave pool would be an attractive amenity for La Quinta. "I think this is a cool project — I really do — but I don't think it's in the right location, and maybe the timing isn't great because of the drought," Evans said. 'A land of permanent drought': Coachella Valley's golf courses work to cut water usage "But I feel like La Quinta would deserve a project like this someplace in the city," she added. "I think that we can be on the forefront of having something like this in different times, and maybe that's where our sphere of influence comes in." It wasn't immediately clear what will happen with the existing plans for the nearly 40o-acre plot of land, but John Gamlin, president of CM Wave Development LLC, told The Desert Sun his team will soon begin evaluating its options. "We're disappointed with last night's outcome and will evaluate our options in the near future," Gamlin said in an email Thursday morning. Councilmember John Pena noted the hearing "could've gone either way," adding it certainly won't be the last tough development decision to come before the city council. Clarification: This story has been updated to clarify the water surface and size of the wave basin included in the final proposal before the council. Tom Coulter covers the cities of Palm Desert, La Quinta, Rancho Mirage and Indian Wells. Reach him at thomas.coulter@desertsun.com or on Twitter @tomcoulter . 269 https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/local/la-quinta/2022/09/21/la-quinta-city-council-rejects-coral-mountain-resort-project-5-0-vote/10425977002/ 5/5 Y 'i � ,,fi�rr ?� • � . _ 1 v `,I rtr 14 All 1-401 Am pool Gortcl in Pi5cvvert� ,Pa-rk. Go�.ce�t14al 4x6i.i�iit 270 Gorxl Mot+htaiv� �iscoUer� �a,rk. (!,onceptuat ZxAi�lt Poi.9n prepare, � �� TG z Aurn � rot4 p, InciL Pre�are,�for );7M Pesi n xn� C,oacfvella Vxlle� Park a-ni jzecreation District 271 abou t t`v, Irc j, as In 2006 The Acorn Group began working with RIM Design and the Coachella Valley Park and Recreation District to develop a conceptual plan for interpretation at the proposed Coral Mountain Discovery Park in La Quinta. The purpose of this effort was to guide development of interpretive panels, plant identification signs, orientation and regulatory signs, as well as content for exhibits in the outdoor discovery center. In 2007 a Sign and Exhibit Plan was submitted for review by project stakeholders, including archaeologists, tribal representatives of Mission and Cahuilla Indians, museum curators, educators, and representatives of the cities of La Quinta and Palm Desert, as well as Coachella Valley Park and Recreation District. The final edition of this document set the course for development of all park panels, including text, graphics, and commissioned art; and conceptual design of the discovery center's exhibits. Based on the direction established in the Sign and Exhibit Plan, The Acorn Group prepared a conceptual design package consisting of exhibit perspective views, floor plan, and narrative description of exhibits planned for the discovery center, as well as camera-ready files for the sign package. These elements are contained in this document. 6orx1 MountA.in JiscoveT Fitrk. The 600-acre Coral Mountain Discovery Park is located at the foot of Coral Mountain. Proposed interpretive features include a discovery center —a shaded outdoor installation with exhibits and displays, an amphitheater, fire pit, water feature, picnic tables, and seating —plus a loop trail with orientation, plant identification, and interpretive signs around the developed, 123- acre portion of the park. The loop trail proposed for the developed segment of the park will link with other trails that provide access to the mountainous portion of the site, as well as connect to city and regional trails developed by others. Existing plans propose that landscaping for the park mimic the shape of Coral Mountain itself, with the loop trail skirting the footprint of the mountain as viewed from above. Slightly elevated terrain within the loop trail will suggest the much more pronounced heights of the mountain. The discovery center is designed as an open-air ramada that contains three clusters of exhibits that further advance the visitor's understanding of Coral Mountain and the surrounding environs. Interactive and hands-on exhibits and displays focus on the cultural and natural heritage of the region, from ancient times through the present. e ! 272 Tke Visitor's experience The visitor's experience at Coral Mountain Discovery Park will be enhanced by two sets of park amenities: those that address basic needs (water, restrooms, shade, and picnic tables) and those that pique curiosity and lead to exploration and discovery (trails, interpretive panels, plant identification signs, and exhibits). The discovery center will offer a retreat from the sun and desert heat and an exploratory experience based on a series of exhibits and displays that accommodate a wide range of ages and interests. The proposed exhibits reflect two unifying themes and four broad topics. -,1 'f7 &I77 'C 273 Interreti Va 71i.etne As with most sites, there are many stories associated with Coral Mountain. To be effective, interpretation must focus audience attention, usually limited by time, on a few stories considered by the client and stakeholders to be the most important. To that end, the Acorn Group asked stakeholders to identify a handful of "take home" messages that they felt captured the significance of Coral Mountain. Discussions with the client and stakeholders suggested four broadly defined topics that "To say nothing is out here is incorrect; to say the form the focus for interpretation at Coral Mountain: desert is stingy with everything except space and The story of ancient Lake Cahuilla, particularly how the lake formed and reformed, the origin of tufa deposited on the granite mountain, why and when the lake disappeared, and what role the lake and lakebed played in human history. The desert ecology/environment including local flora and fauna in the past and present day. The human history of the area, particularly those chapters related to visible features —use by native peoples, "rock art," agriculture, flood control (dike), and residential/resort communities. The need for protection of the site and, more generally, the importance of preserving open space and outdoor recreation sites in the region. The challenge of interpretation is to take these broad topics and explore what they mean and, more importantly, why contemporary audiences would be interested in them. The job of interpretation is to explore how the natural and cultural past of Coral Mountain is relevant to the 211� century and to today's audiences with their diverse interests and perspectives. As David Glassberg suggests in Sense of History: The Place of the Past in American Life, when designing interpretation "we must ensure that the multiple voices of the community be represented." This is particularly important since "individuals understand places differently depending on how they have experienced them, and this experience in turn is shaped by their social characteristics such as age, gender, race, class, and physical condition." light, stone and earth is closer to the truth." William Least Heat Moon, Blue Highways 274 The broad topics suggested by the client and stakeholders provide an excellent place to begin. Remembering the ultimate goal of interpretation —to create engaging signs and exhibits for Coral Mountain that are relevant to contemporary audiences —it becomes important to craft themes with care. Ideally, these storylines will provoke audiences to think about and to internalize Coral Mountain's significance and enlist them in efforts to protect and preserve the park's resources. In short, the broad topics need to be stated in ways that diverse audiences can grasp easily and remember beyond the short duration of their on -site visit. Tj .epne, 1: Goral )Koi4ntai.n is like a. jvc,� tn. 5tert . Even a casual visit to Coral Mountain raises questions and offers clues to the realities of past and present. But what do those visible clues actually mean —the "bathtub ring" so evident on the mountainside, the presence and origin of the "coral," the rock art left by many generations of different peoples, the dike that bisects the site, even the desert habitat that seems devoid of water but still supports a variety of plant, animal, and insect species? What can we learn about the natural and human history of this place by studying the site and exploring its mysteries? As human development su rounds the mountain, what is the future of this and similar parks? Will Coral Mountain's clues be preserved for future generations to puzzle over and learn from? Like any good mystery the story of Coral Mountain is solved bit -by -bit, layer -by -layer. As each clue is explored and each layer uncovered, we learn something new. Contemporary natural and human history rests atop layers and layers of stories. Before the residential and resort history of the region, stagecoach routes and agriculture brought explorers and settlers to the area. Government survey teams passed through the valley. Local church congregations used Coral Mountain for sunrise services. There is evidence of target practice that mutilated rock art and illegal pot -hunting that removed native artifacts. Before the settlers and explorers, the Cahuilla, an enduring constant in the region's human history, lived with and off the land —the significance of the site to native peoples is a critical element in the human story. Reaching back even farther, a pattern of flooding and evaporation altered the landscape again and again as ancient Lake Cahuilla laid down layers of silt on the valley floor and formed tufa on the uplifted granite. Then and now, these layers of life formed a desert habitat where drought resistant plants struggle above the sandy soil scorched by the sun, their roots searching for water within the earth. Animals find shade as they can above ground or in the cooler darkness of burrows and tunnels. How do they manage to survive and even thrive? This theme is the ideal complement to the client's desire to engage audiences in discovery and provide on -site interactive media. It challenges the intellect to question 275 and search for answers. It connects puzzling landscape features with the subtle history of the site. Because it offers a perfect focus for the interpretive center, we recommend that all media within the center be designed to explore Coral Mountain's mysteries and its layers of history and habitat. I -Az e-Z": -;list iircra'i0iter inate c'•oral Afm4ntain'5,P45tanr �reserzt. Unlike theme #1, this theme addresses the obvious rather than the mysterious. It acknowledges the salient environmental reality of Coral Mountain —usually this place is sunny, hot, and dry. While the human story plays a role in this theme, nature takes center stage. Ever since geologic forces pushed Coral Mountain into place on the Coachella Valley horizon, the sun has influenced and largely determined the mountain's flora and fauna. Yet there is no denying the role played by the more elusive element in this natural equation — water, both its presence in the past and its scarcity today. Water, like sun, featured prominently in the history of Coral Mountain. Colorado River floods created ancient Lake Cahuilla, followed by intense desert sunshine that exposed the valley floor and tufa deposits that we see today. Water, continually evaporating into the dry desert air, has influenced human use of the land and determined the flora and fauna that live within the region. And the future of the region, as a resort and residential community, is undeniably linked to climate and the presence of a sustainable supply of water. Coral Mountain captures the essence of life in the Coachella Valley —sun for recreation and water for survival. Since this theme will be evident and immediate for every visitor who leaves the shaded interpretive center and walks the park's proposed trails, we recommend that the interpretive stops along the loop trail introduce, focus on, and explore this storyline. Since most visitors to the park will not have the benefit of staff or docent -led interpretive programs, both themes work well because they are well illustrated by the site and by site landscapes visible from the park's proposed trails. Both themes also resonate in a variety of cultures —the history and culture of native peoples as well as the history and culture of settlers are well represented by both storylines. Both are broad enough to fit into a school's curriculum yet are specific enough to generate ideas for teaching specific academic skills in many disciplines —history, reading, math, science, and art. Seniors, an important audience for the park, often enjoy stories of the past, particularly when the more recent history of the 2011 century is woven into a theme. 276 N5coveT center Zxk4it Narrative We recommend that the interactive exhibits developed for Coral Mountain focus on the "mysteries" of Coral Mountain. We see many more than six possibilities and suggest that the actual arrangement of exhibits be dispersed rather than concentrated in a single block in the interpretive center. A design that disperses rather than concentrates the exhibits will accomplish two important objectives: it will spatially reinforce the interpretive stories, and it will allow more interaction with the exhibits on busy days or during group visits. As now conceived, the interactive exhibits would occupy three clusters. Ui45ter f: )4s 5terie5 o f 66 e past This cluster will focus on evidence related to Lake Cahuilla. It will help visitors understand how the ancient lake formed and what happened to it. We suggest including any or all of the following interactive devices: A. Portal to the Mountain This interactive uses "viewing ports" —a device that on -site visitors look through that focuses attention on a particular feature/aspect of the story. This device could be as simple as fixed "pipes" at varying heights positioned so that when visitors look though the pipe they see the mountain. Accompanying interpretation will help visitors put the view into thematic context. B. Shifting Shorelines Visitors need to have a sense of the size and scope of Lake Cahuilla, and understand that it fluctuated over time. Superimposed on a map of modern day Southern California, this interactive will show the shorelines of the ancient lake at three different levels depicted on three movable sheets of translucent tempered glass. C. Notes from the Field The natural processes that formed modern natural landscapes are not always easy to explain, and often have been a matter of speculation over time. This interactive will use the 1853 expedition and field notes of geology professor Dr. William Blake to introduce lake formation theories and history. It will include three explanations of Coral Mountain/Lake Cahuilla for visitors to compare: 277 Pixc,Vary Center T xfui it Narro title • Excerpts from Blake's field notes focusing on his observations about the lake/lakebed. • Cahuilla oral histories about the lake and the lake's impact on people in the area. • Modern explanations that incorporate the most recent science. Visitors will move sliding panels, suggesting layers of history, to read each explanation/history. D. Clues Left Behind In order to introduce the surviving clues to the lake's history, this display will show a fabricated cross section of layered materials left behind as the shoreline receded: "bathtub rings," travertine, beach deposits, sand bars, fossils of Pleistocene fish, and gastropods. It also could include cultural artifacts indicating human activity along the shore, perhaps with a map of Cahuilla village locations in the 19th century and earlier. E. Towers of Tufa In order to help visitors understand how tufa formed, this exhibit will explain the relationship between photosynthesizing algae and lime. It also might include photos of other locations where tufa has formed or is forming, such as Mono Lake. F. Tufa to Touch Once visitors become curious about tufa, they need an outlet for that curiosity that avoids damage to the tufa itself. This interactive will allow visitors to touch tufa in the planned environment of the discovery center and help them understand how easily it can be damaged. Uu5ter,Z: TVi4ence o f f-nce5tPr5 This cluster focuses on human history. It explores how humans adapted and used the land and suggests ways that we learn about the past. We suggest including any or all of the following interactive devices: A. Traces of the Past A fabricated archaeological site with transect lines, tools, exposed pottery sherds, and lithic scatter will help visitors understand how archaeologists help us learn about human land use in the past. 278 PiscovaT Center Zxkibit XxrratiUe C•1t45ter B. Stories in Stone While the meaning and symbolism of some rock art is evident, that is not always the case. This exhibit will explore what rock art means and who made it. Displays will help visitors decode the meaning of various symbols and link the art to different people/groups and purposes for creating the art. Reproductions of the rock art on the mountain will make it accessible to visitors and explain the difference between petroglyphs and pictographs. This display has another important objective —to explain the importance of protecting the historic art because of what it can tell us about the past. C. Connecting the Dots: Plants, Things, and People In order to connect plants and material culture, a matching activity will challenge visitors to think about how the Cahuilla used plants like mesquite, opuntia, barrel cactus, desert tea, agave, yucca, and fan palm, etc., and show examples of Cahuilla pottery, basketry, bows, etc. made from natural materials. Displays might include actual descriptions of how some foods tasted, or of the qualities of utilitarian objects made from natural materials. A similar matching activity will connect more recent residents and area visitors to the artifacts in their lives, particularly the importance of agricultural products and outdoor recreational facilities to the 20th century economy of the area. The text includes mention of the Cahuilla as the first farmers in the valley. In order to encourage visitors to explore the entire park and connect themes/stories, a portion of this exhibit will suggest that visitors go and find some of the plants interpreted and will give visual information that helps their quest. D. Leave Your Mark Clearly, humans want to leave their mark and even express their personal creativity. This interactive will develop an opportunity for visitors to do just that via a "leave your mark" album. Here, we envision a securely anchored photo album -type book and pen. Visitors would be challenged to sign -in, creating a pictograph or series of pictographs that best illustrates their experience at Coral Mountain that day. 279 PiseovaT center Zxfvi�it NarrotiVe Volunteers or staff will need to check entries on a periodic basis to ensure tastefulness and to maintain an ample supply of pages for new entries. Cluster 3: Desert Secrets The third cluster focuses on the desert environment. We suggest including any or all of the following interactive devices: A. Adaptable Animals In order to understand how animals deal with desert conditions, this "trail"within the discovery center is accented by smal interpretive panels that explain each species' specific behavioral and structural adaptations for coping with harsh desert conditions. A faux bronza bas relief sculpture of each animal is mounted on or adjacent to it. Animal adaptations include those of the: Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard; desert tortoise; red -diamond rattlesnake; Gambel's quail; burrowing owl; desert cottontail; California leaf -nosed bat; and Coachella giant sand treader cricket. A display of discoveries from mammoths to shellfish will explain the evolution of animal habitat. B. Pliable Plants This interactive field guide is similar, but focuses on plants. Panels with flip lid mechanisms reveal specific adaptations of desert plants: the spines and hairs of opuntia; the long taproot of mesquite; the tangled shallow roots of cacti; the creosote's secretion of toxins to prevent growth of other plants competing for limited water and its movement of leaves away from direct exposure to the sun's rays; the waxy coating on the leaves and stems of desert shrubs; and the ability of an ocotillo or palo verde to "drop 'em during drought." By incorporating natural materials in some of the displays, this exhibit will allow visitors to touch and feel textures. C. Nature's Rhythms —Daily and Seasonal Change Daily and seasonal change are important elements of the story, particularly the cycle of plants harvested by the Cahuilla but also to agriculture and patterns of tourism. These changes can be illustrated via displays that show different plants and different conditions at each season. D. Sun and Water —Fire Ring & Water Feature Since the interpretive center design includes a fire ring and water feature, we suggest developing companion interpretation that calls attention to the primary natural elements of sun and water, reinforcing a primary park storyline. :E Floor Flan of t4 Ncovery Center -00 Stories In Stone Leave Your A ark Stone bench r� Connecting the Dots Interactive station �❑ n Tula Towers CLUSTER 2: EVIDENCE OF ANCESTORS - ❑ 0 Ufa to Touch LT h �---}} ❑ I__I CLUSTERI; MYSTERIES OF THE PAST Shifting Shorelines Notes From the Field Interactive �� & Clues Left Behind Nature's Rhythms Pliable _ Plants i CLUSTER 3: DESERT SECRETS ❑ ;-- 0Adaptable Animals 281 Towers c f Tu fa In order to help visitors understand how tufa forms, this exhibit explains the relationship between photosynthesizing algae and lime. It also might include photos of other locations where tufa has formed or is forming, such as Mono Lake. To fig. to Taocn Once visitors become curious about tufa, they need an outlet for that curiosity that avoids damage to the tufa itself. This interactive will allow visitors to touch tufa in the planned environment of the discovery center and help them understand how easily it can be damaged. 282 Z -Sr vi ftin9 _SC►oreli:les Visitors need to have a sense of the size and scope of Lake Cahuilla, and understand that it fluctuated over time. Superimposed on a map of modern day Southern California, this interactive shows the shorelines of the ancient lake at three different levels depicted on three movable sheets of translucent tempered glass. 283 3 Stories isi Stone While the meaning and symbolism of some rock art is evident, that is not always the case. This exhibit will explore what rock art means and who made it. Displays will help visitors decode the meaning of various symbols and link the art to different people/groups and purposes for creating the art. Reproductions of the rock art on the mountain will make it accessible to visitors and explain the difference between petroglyphs and pictographs. This display has another important objective —to explain the importance of protecting the historic art because of what it can tell us about the past. 284 4 Traces o f tl.e past A fabricated archaeological site with transect lines, tools, exposed pottery sherds, and lithic scatter will help visitors understand how archaeologists help us learn about human land use in the past. 285 If portxt to tk.e 74m4nta-in This interactive uses "viewing ports" —a device that on -site visitors look through that focuses attention on a particular feature/ aspect of the story. This device could be as simple as fixed "pipes" at varying heights, positioned so that when visitors look though the pipe they see the mountain. Accompanying interpretation will help visitors put the view into thematic context. 286 fi-c�aytabte �-KiH,.als In order to understand how animals deal with desert conditions, this "trail"within the discovery center is accented by smal interpretive panels that explain each species' specific behavioral and structural adaptations for coping with harsh desert conditions. A faux bronza bas relief sculpture of each animal is mounted on or adjacent to it. Animal adaptations include those of the: Coachella Valley fringe -toed lizard; desert tortoise; red - diamond rattlesnake; Gambel's quail; burrowing owl; desert cottontail; California leaf -nosed bat; and Coachella giant sand treader cricket. 287 Panel ,Z oaks can be deceiving. Whilc the •'hathtub ring" deposit% on Coral Mountain look to some likc the animals that form underwater reefs, thais not so. Thcy arc really minerals —fresh water lime dcpn%tts called tufa. .Although tufa forms in several ways. here it probabiv appeared as ancient Lakc Cahuilla dried up. The lake certatn1 had all the needed ingredients. It had lots of seashells comaining calcium carbonate. Plus. the Coachella Vallev had lots of sunlight that not oniv dried up the lake but also triggered photosynthesis to the algae growing in shallow water on hard rock surfaces. In these Neal conditions. tufa deposits built up to as much as two feet thick. X-ninial or Mineral? x r -AAc -4 t y -eel �•• l..� -i ,�-b.,`�• •y� ter` � �t�- _ � ^• ~,r.'r A. A ..d� srr.,r.i..I1 �L. aw.,.vr.J.A.Lw of Ik rw1 en r•.. — Cco/Ww William !Blair. 185.1 f r •i J-4 1- In 1 4 w u'Lwp, Ik 6n—.. +.ry..r f.rJ %1—f— r:: panel 3 n the desert, water does a disappearing act. Scarce rainfall _ la little more than 3 inches each vcar in L Ouinta)• stream runoff, and melting snow sink downward through the porous soil to underground aquifers. It is this groundwater. stored in sand. gravel. silt, and cln'. that sustains life to the Coachella Vallcv. The long tap roots of some desert trees access It. y,+ SO do the residential neighbors - of the park '�- who get their water" -- from groundwater supplies• just like the Cahuilla who knew each natural spring and dug impressive wclh with steps descending deep into the earth. Where's the Water? The Cahuulla, to fact, learned to read the land to Gnd water. Thev understood that certain features like a mesquite grove or ' palm oasis meant that water lav below. h 1, —Dr. Katherine Siva Saubd `"`�"'"h'"'�" '", ' '••""" r` "'` . n..,ir....ar� 99 pa.hel 44 umans have left their mark on this landscape, clues to who thev were and why thcv were here. Archeologists have found evidence of occupation by Cahuilla clans and Japanese immigrants. Historians have located accounts of explorers from Spain and land surveyors from the War Department in Washington. DC. The historical society has photos of 'Mexican farmers, transplanted Easterners. WWII soldiers in training, dude ranchers, movie stars and the moguls who made them famous. All around you is evidence of ?Uth ccnlury real estate development and the rise of the resort economy. t; Clues to the, Fast. 't'•rf.r ! Mall, n.l.. /.-41..:. I-h. — Alarc Refiner. Ciddl'ac Desert M r. AA, M1.afv.{,,.fl,. I IA,a4.....d.Glw�M1 vnkh nv.11/ •Il.Iku.� {klra.rl GTjn:v!(.rf 4vn(rr r4..vwrut.d.: w �.. 1<:M1:yn+ 1:..:1 T. .•r.I., r/..o.0 .j r..y...,dr .k..,.�lrnr. pay R 290 f xne-1 f .r ere, all around goo, the underground preserves desert life. Urgcl% hidden from view, the roots of some plants grow deep into the sandv soil searching for water. Other plant roots fan out near the surface waiting to capture every morsel of rainfall or evening dcw. Small mammals, reptiles. and insects hide beneath rocks or burrow to escape both the scorching davtime sun and _ ^� �'� f f predators on the prowl for a iutcv meal. Frogs hibernate underground until a spring rain awakes them like a mating call - It's hard to fully appreciate what you can-t see, but use your imagination and picture not only the life that gists before vour eves but also beneath your feet. Can You ��- 'r`t. __ \--� • '',� ram„-, r t� r� t•/ �Yr — NowAst Mury.ln.mn. L..and u/Little Rain 291 Orientation. Pxncts, f kase I xn. 11 Welcome to Coral Mountain Discovery Park rll Mnm . Berl Y M lo�a LW w► i.r�'..w.�d' �i IIW.. ML �.w, pY�a t4 w.r.w..l..l W uw w i www..4. •..11 I.w .i. ww. �.. r .tl .n die r►..Cmk wlnlpNr w.iIw... TI. p4l vwLL r wr/ r M I.w I.wJI . t1R..w.dld N.i wui M psra d Ci.LL 60....rtw..d �..{ 1wL r.•u !M.rr+..r.l. �..r.J w.w.ld►.d lr.a..w •pedA Iw Sa.1.. Iw... r lyd--ft..i Ca.I Nrr.r w..r /.. d W.7... .�.a+1..lAw.rww.w..�..riti�.rw...,r:.ral...�...ww..........arp.,r....�a.'..ww.�w..r..i t IrwldJ'oi..dM"0 r•.nn prr ply. YJL.. MW w. ls..r M4 ....1... M , N.. I. r.�.w Welcome to Coral Mountain Discovery Par r. nw.\w.ndplsl....1dr....ir.iu..,.w11..+quruMld.•.wf.Mp.r...df�b.G.l.lrwa.dr.r..wil..►d.v S.r..lr.rlrol n....rwa CaJl.Lv..rwrw dlwop.drr..y.q W.yc.�.. �1...., 6..w. l.m ..w. wr.r.dr+d M A.rr rrn 11. • �.1 i�ll..IW4 r. �kn r RV 292 Orientation Pomet, f Ease III Welcome to Coral Mountain f iisc'overy Park :wrrlN ::: �u• ,Jl � r.na.• a.•at rw 1r.1 w.l Yrwrr ra.lrf Tales Yi4. Ml.arn /dT. R ...n—. uW 1�. rnw r r1. �r.r4.,rw b.., rin nn ,...f Jl Tk .ol M.DiI plan .aald atl rrd rrh <nw.cnak . f,aw..a1H rw. w.rF d.l...r. d t jkwp. kar.. w•.kr of rrl Ina. W na. 176—.rkk,N—Iw d"L-06M.,.wMtl1.b. ' .,.. 6—or kpi n. r.k C.0-.ww-6,—,, .,.lrr.ow 4.k.4.. w r6.., ld Jar.rr..w.rA.r.+r6+1.►r+r+w..+.le.IfL...»..ru...hrTi..«-4'.ru..nu... 1 Iw 41 , dr. d a, rr r.....—..„I i,tl.r IILl... A. w IM fYL.. rw .ear tr Nr . JeeiNtator� partiet Welconie to Coral Mountain I�iscovery 'ark Enjoy Coral Mountain Discovery Park from sunrise to sunset. Please remain on the trails. The desert is easily damaged and slow to heal. Coal Mountain~ rock art is fascinating, famous, and vcry fragile. The original art is protected, but Coral Mountain Discovery Park exhibits provldc an up-closc, lunds on look at some of the carvings. Desert plants and animals work hard to survisc here. I'lasc do not make their life more difficult by picking or trampling them. *Final logo will need to be dropped in. 293 ,Pta.nt f4nti fickttion panels Desert willow Latin names Chilupsts linearis Ghuilla name: (laankish The r/aan4ish makes the most of div climates. hugging riser bottoms and washes. The Cahuilla used its flexible but long lasting wood for house frames and bows, and if, bark fibers for nets and clnthing. i ion ;v Mesquite Latin name: Prnsopn pfliIlom Cahuilla name: //q Desert Cahuilla relied heavily on A* Mesquite nor only provided nutritious. dependable. easy to prepare and store food. but also wood for fires. mortars. corner posts, and rafters. and fiber for skirts and diapers. t"11 C. Vesei Agave a°' Latin name: Agave deserti a` Cahuilla name:.iamu/ .iamu/helped the Cahuilla sur%i%c in ]can times. The supply of agave remained rclati%civ cansum from vcar to vcar. November and December. when other foods were unasailablc. were actually the hest months to harvest agasc. 1 Creosote Bush Latin name: Larrea dntrricata ' I Cahuilla name: Atukul The Cahuilla used attikul to treat their ills. From stems and leaves ihev brewed to for colds. stomach ailmems. even cancer. Steam from the leaves relieved congestion. Poultices applied to wounds prevented infection. l 294 'tomt lgerzti ficatiorz �avicels IL 0 Calit"im-nia Chia f � Fan Palm �� Latin name. Salrta Columluriae f'ahutlla name. Pawl Una tame: Wa,hinyron filifera °4t. lf• Cahuilla Dame. A/anl t arclul with their natural world. the C:ahutlla �a. -Now burned stand, of paw1 to encourage growth to the A Cahuflla stop' sav,. the people were t actticd all about the coumrv' in rnaro ir{ d i future. C:ahualla women gathered chu seeds in y sumnter and ground them into meal. or used them t t places, but thev all came to the Indian `t to treat infections. ` t Well to lit of the fruit of file palm tree ... It was Sweet like honev. and was cniotcd •' ' �� by ever vfrodv.- Barrel Cactus Ljtm namc aserrxaau, u�anrh., fe, Cahuilla mane Kupash •-ay. Cacti like k"sh required food gatherers to like ~ special care—Cahutlla women used sticks to pick cactus buds and amid the plant's ,pines. Boiled buds taste a hit like artnhoke,. Peer Grass Latin name: Afuhlrnbergta riven, Cahudla name: Saul Cahutlla basket w'cascrs used ,uulstalk,. collecfcd from secret incation, by men on hunting trips, as the foundanna or 1 1 hommnul (time for their beautifully I designed basket,. I f _f 295 Rant 14anti fication Panets De let Zoor Smoketree DatePatel } Latin name: Psaarothamnusspinosus Latin name: Phoenix ductylifera Smokctrcc is the official tree of the City of La t•' ` Quinta. Like city residents, it does well in a warm. In Arabic. Dglet Nbor meats "date of light" dry climate. From a distance. it looks like a gray Whets held to the sun. these data have light. golden -'atiA •r r puff of smoke. In early summer. the centers. Popular as snacks. dates work well in baked `puffs" turn purple as way blossoms goods. Twentieth ccntury ranchers planted acres of cover the tree. aoo native Deglet Noor date palms throughout the00 !; Coachella Valley. Wjave Yucca 49 Desert Sand Latin time: Yucca schidugaa , Verbena Cahuills tumor panuur l or lunuvat `/ b 1 of of many uses nu'ul at once provides ` h �~ h ` Latin name Abronia villaw Plea pa p Cahuilla tame: Tental nyuku fiber. food. and soap. Like other Southwest tribes. the Cahuilla used its tough leaves as fibers for -Spring had come to the desert To honor its baskets. cordage (rope) and even paintbrushes. They . coming the dusts unrolled verl+cw carpets of ate its flowers and fruits. raw or cooked. They t royal purple: as said by movie director and La pounded the stems and roots and mixed them with •��,� Quin a resident Frank Capra in his autobiography. water to create a sudsy soap or rthampoo. t /,' \,._ The Nome Above the Title. - Desert sand verhem is the off icul flower of the City of La Quinta. 296 11/19/25, 8:27 PM Gmail - Re: Coral Mountain Documents + comments re applications TTM2025-0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 M Gmail Mary Mann <maryhpmann@gmail.com> Re: Coral Mountain Documents + comments re applications TTM2025-0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025- 0002 1 message Mary Mann <maryhpmann@gmail.com> Tue, Nov 4, 2025 at 10:32 AM To: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov>, Planning WebMail <Planning@laquintaca.gov>, Consulting Planner < Consulting Plan ner@laquintaca.gov>, LA QUINTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY <laquintahistoricalsociety@gmail.com>, kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov Cheri, Thank you for the responses to my questions prior to the Planning commission last week and also appreciate you and the others meeting with me last week at City Hall. I still have significant questions on the implementation of this plan as presented in TTM2025-0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 for the club at Coral Mountain project. You indicated you might be able to provide me with contact information for your archaeologist, the contact at the agua caliente tribe, forest service, and Desert Recreation District for more information about some different aspects of this plan and the agreements with the city and developer. The rock art plan needs to be reviewed and approved before any ground work starts. The plan needs to incorporate potential impacts of proposed development across the the tufa exposure as this is all connected. The developer and adjoining property owners (BLM, BOR, leaseholder DRD, CVWD) also need to be informed and approve of this plan for this larger community resource. City and CVWD suggestions may be needed to provide for the protection of historical and biological resources in the same area. There was also an indication from our conversation that in the applicants plan there has been an incorporation of the activities of the La Quinta Historical Society related to the pending project into their implementation plan. Given the amount of resources contained on this property I'm hoping that this is the case and requesting documentation of the plan for at a minimum documenting the history of this place before these resources can be cut off and destroyed. I'm very concerned about the vague timelines given by the applicant and the possibility of work beginning that will directly impact sensitive resources that have yet to be documented defined or adequate matters put into place for their protection or the long-term enjoyment and education of the public. There is significant uncertainty with the agreement with IID as to win this project could finally go forward with adequate electricity agreements in place. Building a barrier wall cuts off all of our community views of Coral Mt and shoreline. The disturbing dust of grading a building the golf course puts current residences at jeopardy from an or quality perspective and will significantly impact our quality of life. I'm saddened by the thought of my son growing up in a construction zone. There was no discussion of the water resources and impacts to the water district infrastructure, this must be better understood by the City before this plan is about to be implemented. The alignment of the barrier wall on the west side crosses over and blocks off critical water infrastructure and I have seen no documentation of the agreements with Coachella valley water district or any other public safety arms that indicate they are aware or have planned for how are public resources and infrastructure will be accessed and maintained. Other public comments at the meeting on 28 October and myself have a concern about the lake, this was not mentioned how much material will be moved and where it will be placed. Please keep in mind the fine dust that will be liberated by any action on this property that is fully naturally stable at the moment. Significant questions and skepticism from the planning commissioners were not adequately explained regarding the ingress egress plan all around the development at last week's public meeting. We have been given no timeline for when this project will start, and how it is planned to progress, when grading will begin , and etc. This risk is putting all of us in a situation of blowing dust for years to come, in an unfinished or unused project. Then significant reduction of the number of svtr in the proposed plan has the city looked into or requested information from applicant regarding the demand for this type of housing or another golf course and how that impacts our City finances? This is definitely not my area of expertise but it seems that the justification for approval of this project hinged a lot on the projected money from the future homeowners and their investments. Given that there will be a lot less of them how come there hasn't been a discussion of this significant impact to what the City thought it would gain from this project in the way of TOT I hope that we can be privy to the cost benefit analysis of City supporting development of this project at this time. There is a map in backup documentation (EIR) for this project showing the significant growth of trees Palo Verde, mesquite especially on edges of the property where boundary wall and fence are indicated. We have not seen a plan of which of these trees could or would be protected. These trees provide forage and food for many desert animals the property has been left idle enough are active ecological communities all over this property. And raptors and other birds on Coral Mountain depend on these for food shelter and forage. You need to see the details of the implementation of the biological protection measures. These included limits on time up here for disturbance. None of this was mentioned in the staff report for questions from Planning commission. Enough for now. Please provide any documentation or contacts that would assist me in making the connections with others who have been involved in the analysis of this project. I encourage council to take a harder look at TTM2025-0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 and realize the significance of the implementation of this project for La Quinta's future. Thanks, Mary On Tue, Oct 28, 2025, 13:29 Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Hi Mary, Please see responses below in blue. Thank you. 297 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/?ik=66bl 076637&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-259797070141561706%7Cmsg-a:r-225182711 99869500... 1 /6 11/19/25, 8:27 PM Gmail - Re: Coral Mountain Documents + comments re applications TTM2025-0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 Q"fra Cheri L. Flores I Interim Design and Development Director City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 ta Ph. 760-777-7067 CALIFORNIA - www.laquintaca.gov From: Mary Mann <maryhpmann@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2025 11:42 PM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov>; Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov>; Planning WebMail <Planning@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Fwd: Coral Mountain Documents ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use properjudgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** Cheri Thank you for this. I appreciate you taking the time to look into some of these questions. Couple follow ups -Would it be possible to review the Rock Art Plan? The Rock Art Plan is currently being reviewed by the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians and is not final. When it is final, it can be provided. Would it be possible to view the traffic memo? The traffic memo is available at the following link: https://www.laquintaca.gov/home/showpublisheddocument/51922 I am still unclear why if sensitive areas would not be mapped and designated where they occur on and off the property. This is an integrated feature that runs along the base of coral mountain and would connecting all the sensitive areas that were mapped. The mitigation measures for the features just off the property would be subject to the same mitigation measures if site development activities proceed. Neither the City nor the applicant can impact property that is outside the project boundary. The adjacent properties are not under the City's nor the applicant's control and cannot be conditioned to implement protections on adjacent properties. There actually is an above ground active water conveyance structure (you can see the rectangle, the I if IRR is in is close to center of snip). It appears to be a stand -pipe, connected to the tile lines for agricultural purposes. 298 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/?ik=66bl 076637&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-259797070141561706%7Cmsg-a: r-22518271199869500... 2/6 11/19/25, 8:27 PM Gmail - Re: Coral Mountain Documents + comments re applications TTM2025-0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 PROP. LC Thanks, Mary On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 11:39 AM Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Hello Mary, wanted to address your questions in your email below. Please see the responses below in yellow highlight. Thank you. Cheri L. Flores I Interim Design and Development Director City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760-777-7067 www.laquintaca.gov From: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 9:17 AM To: Mary Mann <maryhpmann@gmail.com>; Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Consulting Planner<ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Planning WebMail <Planning@laquintaca.gov> Subject: RE: Coral Mountain Documents Hello Mary, Thank you for sending these over. We will include this in the public record for the meeting. 299 https://mai I.google.com/mai I/u/0/?i k=66b 1076637&view=pt&search=al I&permthid=thread-a: r-259797070141 561 706%7Cmsg-a: r-22518271199869500... 3/6 11/19/25, 8:27 PM Gmail - Re: Coral Mountain Documents + comments re applications TTM2025-0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 Cheri L. Flores I Interim Design and Development Director City ofLa Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. 760-777-7067 CALIFORNIA www.laquintaca.gov From: Mary Mann <maryhpmann@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 8:22 AM To: Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov>; Consulting Planner<ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov>; Planning WebMail <Planning@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Documents "EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** You don't often get email from maryhpmann@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Cheri, Thanks for speaking with me at the CC meeting yesterday. I have started a list of questions regarding the Tract Map and development permit applications, so this can be considered communication on the scheduled Hearing on October 28. Sending to you as a start of my questions and comments on these applications. Tract map Note 6: Refers to lot Y- as having an easement for a trail. Lot Y on the map is on the northern side of the property, so may be mislabeled, supposed to refer to lot "Al"? Note 6 is shown at the location of the trail. It is somewhat confusing, because it has a triangle around it like the easement notes, but it is shown on the western boundary of the project, where the trail currently exists. Considering that is the case please explain where the trail would go. The line of the fence as shown would require the trail either outside of the fence or over the rocky area. (this is further shown in site development permit, which is not clarifying). This the fence line and trail directly impacts a Unique Geologic Feature, Cultural and Historical resources that are currently visited by 10s-100 visitors a week. This was not considered in the underlying EIR. Further Environmental Assessment is needed to determine a way for intended development to proceed while respecting the existing environment and many community resources it provides. What is meant by Environmentally Sensitive areas noted in tract map and documents? See response above. The trail will continue in its existing location. It will be located west of the PBS fence, as shown in detail E, on page L3.01 of the SDP 2025-0001 plant set. As it relates to the rock art which is to be protected in the ESAs, the archaeologist established their locations. The reason for their protection is because they have been subject to vandalism and damage by trail users and others, and they must be protected during construction. The ESAs will be recorded on the property when the Final Map is complete, and will protect the land in perpetuity. The EIR considered these areas specifically, which resulted in Mitigation Measure CUL-5, which requires that ESAs be established to protect these resources. What led to this definition and why is it only defined for the small areas shown, when the conditions along the entire toe of slope are similar including bat and bird nesting grounds, unique geologic features and archaeological artifacts? Is there a planning document that explains what considerations would be made during construction and ongoing use within and adjacent to these areas that was submitted with the application? The ESAs were established by the archaeologist and the Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI), and are applied specifically to protect the archaeological resources on the edge of the site. Mitigation measures in the Biological Resources section of the EIR require that bats and nesting birds be protected through surveys to make sure that they are not present, but do not require the establishment of ESAs. As it relates to ongoing use, the project site is private property. Public use is neither guaranteed nor expected. The City has requested, and the applicant has agreed to provide for the continuation of the trail use on their private property. However, the trail is not located on public land, and even where it occurs on Federal land owned by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) to the southeast, is not a designated public trail. CVWD above ground water conveyance infrastructure at about the marking for "AH" on the 1st page of tract map is not particularly noted, since this is a public water supply, how will this infrastructure remain accessible for maintenance and monitoring, safety throughway in disasters, and availability of our water supply? It does not seem to be considered at all here or in the underlying EIR. This is a concern for Safety and the security of our water30pply. Has https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/?ik=66bl 076637&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-259797070141561706%7Cmsg-a: r-22518271199869500... 4/6 11/19/25, 8:27 PM Gmail - Re: Coral Mountain Documents + comments re applications TTM2025-0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 applicant supplied any dues diligence plans, agreements negotiations with CVWD to show that the concerns and requirements provided in EIR and development agreement are being met regarding existing infrastructure, as well as the requested new ells to be drilled and water conservation and recycling measures to be implemented? Please make these available for viewing There are no above ground CVWD facilities on the property. There are agricultural tile lines on the site, which are underground and will not be disturbed. The developer has been coordinating with CVWD, and must get approval from CVWD for their plans. One of the TCR Mitigation measures in Dev. Agreement required a Rock Art Management Plan, where can I find this, who has reviewed? Also what is the status of recordation of the Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Have these sites been nominated to the National Register of Historic Places as also stated under mitigation measures. Because the rock art will be directly impacted by the implementation of the proposed maps and development plan this will need to be vetted and implemented prior to any disturbance. The Rock Art Management Plan and the National Register (NR) nomination are both under review by ACBCI. When their review is complete, the Management Plan will be implemented, and the NR nomination will be submitted. The rock art is located in the ESA areas, and will be protected by fencing during construction. The Management Plan will determine whether the rock art will be fenced for protection in the long term. Was a traffic plan included with this application? It is unclear how the different egress and access points to the development will be, please clarify. It seems imprudent not to have access from Avenue 58. A traffic study was prepared for the EIR, and a follow-up memo was submitted for the current application. Access to the site will be from a main gate on Madison Street. Emergency access will be provided on the southeast portion of the site, north of Calle Conchita. Commercial access is planned for the future commercial lot on Avenue 58. Given that the property on the NW is designated a park and has the current public access to the public lands why is there not an access point from the development onto these lands. This will surely be a desire of future residents of that development and would make sense for future build out. This should be looked into further to have better alignment with the City General Plan and spirit of agreements with City, DRD and other agencies. The land to the northwest is not owned by the developer or the City, but by the BLM. The project provides the trail through the project that outlets onto this property. The City has no control on whether, or when Desert Recreation District (DRD) implements its plans for the park. From the detail map Sheet 3 on west site where the proposed fence runs NS, there housing lots somewhat set back from the proposed fence lineare adjacent will there be an additional interior wall, if so what is the purpose/need of the fence at this location? How will the current access road from 58th along this line be treated? Is this part of the park? More details are needed to determine if this is appropriate to be approved. Only the fence is planned on the west boundary, not a wall. It's location and purpose were determined by the City, the California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) and the developer during the EIR process. It is being installed to prevent bighorn sheep from accessing the property. There is no public road from Avenue 58 west of the Cantera development. The BLM and DRD may choose to include a road at this location when the park is developed. This project does not interfere with the development of the park, which will be a completely separate undertaking by DRD. Referring the triangle 9 on tract map- ingress and egress easement how will this be maintained what will boundary be between existing (walled) development (erroneously marked vacant on map) and lots Z, X and Y and boundary? Says will incorporate the neighbor wall, will there be a gate to allow ingress and egress? This is a safety concern and homeowners access issue. The easement occurs on both the Cantera project map and this map. It is not planned for immediate use, but could provide emergency access between the developments. What improvements are planned for the end of Ave. 60? Do they take into account concerns of current residents, users of the area and the new neighborhood going in now on the corner of 60/Mad? Avenue 60 will be extended as a public street to a point 100 feet west of the CVWD well site that is provided within the project, and will be designed with a hammerhead at the western end for emergency vehicle turnaround. A symbol for different types of gates are given on page 24 of the Golf course site development plan. I do not see their actual locations on the map, please clarify the locations and what the gates would be for. Is there a back up document that explains what these gates are for and how they will be used? The symbols reference the sheep fencing. The gates will be identified and located in final landscaping plans, when the specifics have been worked out with CDFW. 301 https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/?ik=66bl 076637&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-a:r-259797070141561706%7Cmsg-a: r-22518271199869500... 5/6 11/19/25, 8:27 PM Gmail - Re: Coral Mountain Documents + comments re applications TTM2025-0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 Thanks, Mary Mary Mann, La Quinta Resident 775-527-8963 maryhpmann@gmail.com On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 1:39 PM Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Good afternoon, I have updated the Club at Coral Mountain webpage to include the following documents: Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 Site Development Permit 2025-0001 Site Development Permit 2025-0002 I believe these are the documents you were requesting when you came in this afternoon. Thank you. taQa iea CALIFORNIA Tania Flores, CMC I Administrative Technician Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760) 777-7023 TFlores@LaQuintaCA.gov www.LaQuintaCA.gov 302 https://mai I.google.com/mai I/u/0/?i k=66b 1076637&view=pt&search=al I&permthid=thread-a: r-259797070141 561 706%7Cmsg-a: r-22518271199869500... 6/6 11/19/25, 8:25 PM Gmail - Re: Lake Cahuilla Veterans Regional Park - Master Plan MGmail Mary Mann <maryhpmann@gmail.com> Re: Lake Cahuilla Veterans Regional Park - Master Plan 1 message Mary Mann <maryhpmann@gmail.com> To: Nicole Volpe <Nicole.Volpe@webbassociates.com> Nicole, Thank you very much for reaching out individually! I just filled out the Survey. Mon, Nov 10, 2025 at 9:55 PM On the Master Planning I am especially intrigued by the integration of trail connectivity and supporting the creation of trail heads for equestrian, hiking, mountain biking other outdoor pursuits into the areas surrounding the Lake Cahuilla park. The Desert Recreation District has in their Master Planning an archaeological park on the south side 58th right before the road turns up the Hill. This plan has been shelved since 2009, likely due to lack of funding to support its creation. It relies on an agreement with the BOR for the area, which is set to expire next year. The City of La Quinta, with minimal to no engagement with surrounding public landholders (BOR, BLM, CVWD) has approved a Private golf course Development called the Club at Coral Mt., which will irrevocably alter the access to trails and recreation in this area, as well as damage and/or make inaccessible the Ancient Lake Cahuilla Shoreline feature, which is one of the last intact examples of this. The tufa contains archaeological features (petroglyphs, grinding holes), and the rest of the property also contains historic features (water conveyance infrastructure and an adobe house (not in great condition)). The property has mature trees mesquite and palo Verde and. Coral Mountain has wonderful biodiversity, providing places for bats, bees, and varied other wildlife to make homes in the 'coral' and all the way up the granitic and metamorphic rocks of the mountain. There is amazing wildlife and plant communities on Coral Mt. and this whole corridor needs a solution coordinating the efforts for improving and increasing use of the County Park, along with the needs for locals to recreate on a daily basis and access into the Santa Rosa wilderness. The City of La Quinta does not seem to have engaged with other agencies appropriately to allow for Master Planning to occur prior to disturbing the >380 acre site nor has any effort to engage with the developer to include interpretive elements for the archaeological and natural history or assist with DRD efforts to implement the archaeological park plan. I have questions regarding road improvements on 58th/Jefferson needed as use increases. Also would like the City to be engaged with the agreements/negotiations that take stock of the real treasure we have at Coral Mt and ensure that this intact desert landscape can be enjoyed for generations to come, as it has since the days the Cahuilla people inhabited this place. Staging areas or trailheads for equestrian and pedestrian use are needed along with interpretive information regarding the unique features of this area. It seems like the current planning from the City is not looking at the bigger picture. I was so interested and happy that the Master planning for the existing Park was happening. The upgrades that have been done to the Park are wonderful, it would be so great to integrate this plan and maybe find ways to support City of La Quinta, County, CVWD, DRD, and Federal landholders create an Open Space resource (Regional Park?) that provides recreation possibilities and preserves our natural resources. I am also opposed to building any more of the Sheep Fence until we have some evidence that it is working to help the sheep populations. Would also like to see some assessment from the agencies/groups who have mandated the fencing of the (detrimental) effects of the fence on recreation, public access, and other elements of the desert ecosystem. I have attached the concept for the Archaeological Park. Also a recent Appeal I have filed with City of La Quinta to take another look at the approved development. I do not know if the Appeal has been granted a hearing yet, but it would be in the next 45 days. Also attached some public comments I have been submitting to the City at meetings since May, culminating the 28 October Planning Commission meeting where a tract map and development plan were approved. I am trying to rally some support to delay starting the project until at a minimum there have been some modifications that help us showcase our Coral Mountain treasure and take into account that this is already already a popular area for recreation and discovery. Perhaps you have some contacts that would help me find some ready supporters quickly. I think voices from the involved agencies would be powerful. The local neighbors are burnt out on fighting this development, as this is a second iteration (better but still not good) from the same group of developers since 2021. Any ideas? Thanks, Mary 775-527-8963 303 https://mai 1.google.com/mai 1/u/0/?i k=66b 1076637&view=pt&search=al I&permthid=thread-f:1848427759981543699%7Cmsg-a: r-263879483313484348... 1 /3 11/19/25, 8:25 PM Gmail - Re: Lake Cahuilla Veterans Regional Park - Master Plan PtiC: 'L R CluYstCf t#0Ifcoukee On Mon, Nov 10, 2025, 10:08 Nicole Volpe <Nicole.Volpe@webbassociates.com> wrote: " �Iati5'� . Good morning, Great to meet you at the Ribbon Cutting event this past Saturday, and thank you for your interest in the Lake Cahuilla master plan. Your input is appreciated, and we would value any further information and insight you may have regarding Lake Cahuilla. Attached is a project overview sheet, and at the bottom there is a QR code for the survey. Please reach out if you have any questions at all, or further comments. Thank you, Nicole Volpe, PLA I ASLA I CA License #6436 Senior Landscape Architect A L B E R T A. !)• T (951)248-4280 E Nicole.Volpe@webbassociates.com A S S O C I A T E S 3788 McCray St I Riverside, CA 192506 000 304 https://mai I.google.com/mai I/u/0/?i k=66b 1076637&view=pt&search=al I&permthid=thread-f:1848427759981543699%7Cmsg-a: r-263879483313484348... 2/3 11/19/25, 8:25 PM Gmail - Re: Lake Cahuilla Veterans Regional Park - Master Plan 3 attachments Coral MTN.pdf 10500K OUR SERVICES 9% Water RemnCes 0 Constructim Idanagernent and Inspectwn If Land Devftpment Erx)neering Land Development Planning and Entitlement .� PlanningCommission280ct_WrittenComments1.pdf 3121 K .� Appeal_Mann_7Nov2025 (1).pdf 194K A Traffic and Transportation Engineering I$ Ern-ionmental Services A Land Survey and Wppn9 Services th Landscape An hitecture For mom informatiwr, visit 305 https://mai I.google.com/mai I/u/0/?i k=66b 1076637&view=pt&search=al I&permthid=thread -f:1848427759981543699%7Cmsg-a: r-263879483313484348... 3/3 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Colorado River in Crisis > Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times Cos Angeles dimes Read Part 4 You're Reading Part 5 Read Part 6 Listen to the Podcast CLIMATE &ENVIRONMENT Why desert golf courses and artificial lakes remain untouched by the Colorado River crisis 7E 4 i The Golf Club at Terra Lago in Indio, Calif., borders the desert. As the Colorado River crisis deepens, some residents say the Coachella Valley should begin to limit water use for golf courses and lakes. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times) 306 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 1 /16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times By Ian James Staff Writer Photography by Carolyn Cole Jan. 29, 2023 5 AM PT FOR SUBSCRIBERS LA QUINTA, Calif. — Golf courses. Ponds. Acres of grass. Cascading waterfalls. Displays of water extravagance zip past each day when Sendy Hernandez Orellana Barrows drives to work. She said these views seem like landscapes that have undergone "plastic surgery," transforming large parts of the Coachella Valley's desert into scenes of unnatural lushness. From La Quinta to Palm Springs, the area's gated communities, resorts and golf courses have long been promoted with palm -studded images of green grass, swimming pools and artificial lakes. The entrepreneurs and boosters who decades ago built the Coachella Valley's reputation as a playground destination saw the appeal of developments awash in water, made possible by wells drawing on the aquifer and a steady stream of Colorado River water. "They wanted to basically fabricate this mirage oasis of what they thought the desert could be, with these never-ending golf courses and lagoons," Hernandez Orellana said. "But the reality is that with climate change, we need to start walking away from that." 307 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 2/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times N EV. River/stream Aqueduct/canal Las Vegas • Lake METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT Mead OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA Colorado River LOWER BASIN • La Quinta Salton Sea IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT ARIZ. Ik .• l 1 Colorado River in Crisis: A Times series on the Southwest's shrinking water lifeline Colorado River in Crisis is a series of stories, videos and podcasts in which Los Angeles Times journalists travel throughout the river's watershed, from the headwaters in the Rocky Mountains to the river's dry delta in Mexico. 308 https://www.lati mes.com/environment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-in-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 3/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times She said that means rethinking some of the "unsustainable decisions" that cleared the way for water -intensive developments, and starting to put restrictions on the wasteful misuse of water. "The ponds and the grass are wasteful," Hernandez Orellana said. "If you look at all the country clubs, they all have hundreds and hundreds of feet of grass, artificial lagoons. We don't need that." Hernandez Orellana, who works as a conservation program manager for a nonprofit group, is president of the CactusToClouds Institute, which she co-founded with two friends and her husband, Colin Barrows, a naturalist and desert advocate. She said she believes becoming more climate -resilient will require making better use of water by prioritizing drinking water for communities and reducing consumption that isn't vital. It would help, she said, "if we could just cut down on the amount of water that's being wasted." 309 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 4/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times 4j �.► tom:.., t _ Shadow Lake Estates in Indio is a development built around a private artificial lake where people boat and water-ski. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times) 310 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 5/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times iW M Peninsular bighorn sheep feed on grass in La Quinta. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times) "The golf courses, the lagoons, the waterfalls, all of those artificial water features that we really don't depend on to survive, I think that's where we should start making some of the cuts," she said. However, the elected leaders of the Coachella Valley Water District have taken a different approach. They recently announced plans to cut the amount of Colorado River water the district uses to replenish the aquifer. This strategy will reduce inflows to the valley's source of drinking water for three years, while sparing big users such as golf courses from mandatory cuts, at least for the time being. CLIMATE & ENVIRONMENT �y �- The Colorado River is overused and shrinking. Inside the crisis transforming the Southwest y wh Jan. 26, 2023 311 https://www.lati mes.com/environment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-in-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 6/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times "We want to be the least disruptive possible to any entity, to any user," said Castulo Estrada, vice president of the water district's board. "This is voluntary. And we think that, for now, we could do it out of replenishment without having to impact anybody." Responding to the federal government's call for urgent measures, the water district has proposed to reduce water use by as much as 35,000 acre-feet per year for the next three years, a decrease of about 9%. A portion of the water savings could come from farmers or others who agree to use less water in exchange for payments. But the water district's managers anticipate securing the bulk of the reductions by curtailing water deliveries to a groundwater replenishment facility in La Quinta, where Colorado River water pours into ponds and percolates into the soil to recharge the aquifer. The facility, one of the valley's main groundwater recharge sites, has been taking in Colorado River water since 2009. Studies have shown that the imported water has not only boosted groundwater levels nearby, but has also largely stopped the ground from sinking, a costly problem that had previously damaged roads and cracked the foundations of homes. 312 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 7/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times a � Oki, _• _ At the end of the Coachella Canal, the Colorado River water is routed to ponds at a groundwater replenishment facility, recharging the aquifer. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times) Estrada said that although recharging groundwater continues to be an important part of the district's long-term strategy, board members decided to curtail replenishment as a short-term contribution. "This is the easiest way, the less disruptive way," Estrada said. "We feel that we can properly give up the replenishment for now, without creating too much of an impact." CLIMATE & ENVIRONMENT A river guide's view of Lake Powell's decline and the depths of the Colorado River crisis Jan. 26, 2023 313 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 8/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times State water regulators last year ordered urban suppliers to prepare for shortages by implementing Level 2 measures under their local drought plans. The Coachella Valley Water District asked customers to reduce outdoor water use by io% and began f charging -penalty fees on bills for those who fail to meet the target. But the state hasn't required agencies to reduce the use of nonpotable water. And according to the CVWD, the untreated Colorado River water that is delivered by canal falls into that category, as does water that is pumped from private wells for outdoor irrigation. �.5---- - _ - A housing development called Cantera at Coral Mountain is under construction in La Quinta. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times) 314 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 9/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times Unlike residents, who are subject to drought restrictions, there are no restrictions for those using private wells or canal water to irrigate farmland, golf courses or grass - covered landscapes, or to fill artificial lakes. Barrows said the water district's decision to curtail aquifer replenishment is like "charging the water credit card" and putting off harder decisions for later. "Eventually, it's going to get bad enough that there's just not going to be the water," Barrows said. "We're going to have to deal with less water one way or another." CLIMATE & ENVIRONMENT In California's Imperial Valley, farmers brace for a future with less Colorado . in River water Jan. 27, 2023 If the Coachella Valley were mandated to further reduce its water usage, Estrada said he expects "we probably would start putting limitations on the golf courses." Estrada said the district's officials also have the authority, if necessary, to limit groundwater pumping. But Estrada said he and other board members feel such restrictions aren't necessary at this time. "There is enough water," Estrada said. "We need to be smart about how we do things. But we are not in a crisis right now." For its size, the Coachella Valley has a relatively large water allocation. Though its population is much smaller than the Las Vegas area, it gets more imported water. 315 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 10/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times The Coachella Canal carries Colorado River water and supplies some of the Coachella Valley's golf courses. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times) Colorado River water started flowing to farmland in the valley in 1949 through the Coachella Canal, a branch of the All -American Canal that runs across the desert. The imported water enabled farms to flourish, and nowadays agriculture consumes 72 of the canal's water, accounting for about half the valley's usage and producing crops such as grapes, dates, peppers, lemons and carrots. Since 2003, the Coachella Valley has received an increasing amount of Colorado River water under an agreement with the Imperial Irrigation District. CLIMATE & ENVIRONMENT How Las Vegas declared war on thirsty grass and set an example for the desert Southwest Jan. 29, 2023 316 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 11 /16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times The local water agencies also have an agreement to obtain imported water in the western side of the valley by trading their allotted State Water Project supplies to the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California for equivalent amounts of Colorado River water. This water flows from the Colorado River Aqueduct and pours into a groundwater replenishment facility on the outskirts of Palm Springs. During the last three years of drought, these supplies have been reduced to a fraction of the full allocation. There are about 120 golf courses in the Coachella Valley, and they account for 18% of the area's water use. A single course can consume as much as 1 million gallons a day_. Records show the valleys' golf courses used about the same amount of water in 2019 as they did in 201o, drawing more than half their water from wells, nearly a third from the Colorado River and the remainder from recycled wastewater. Tee boxes at the Golf Club at Terra Lago are surrounded by desert. A single golf course in the area can consume as 317 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 12/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times much as 1 million gallons of water a day. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times) While new golf courses have become rare, developers have been turning to other types of water -intensive amenities, such as lagoons and surfing parks. Projects that are in the works include a 20-acre surf lagoon in Thermal and a 24-acre lagoon at Disney's Cotino development in Rancho Mirage. But in La Quinta, the City Council recently rejected plans for an 18 million -gallon surf park after an outpouring of opposition by residents, who argued the resort would drain precious water that the community needs. Hernandez Orellana and Barrows were among those who spoke against the surf park. They said they were pleased, and a bit surprised, when it was defeated. The couple said filling more artificial lakes in the desert simply doesn't make sense, especially with the Colorado River dwindling. Becoming more sustainable, they said, demands switching to much lower water use. They've demonstrated how it can be done at their house, where they have no grass and no swimming pool. Their frontyard has native plants that attract hummingbirds and monarch butterflies. In the back, they grow tomatoes and peppers in their garden, and their water bill shows they use much less than most homeowners. "Our desert is beautiful as it is, and I think people should learn how to appreciate it and stop ... putting it under the knife," Hernandez Orellana said. She said that although residents can help, local elected officials also should stop approving developments like surf parks, and should start placing restrictions on profligate water use. She said she's concerned that if overpumping of groundwater is allowed to continue, there will be consequences. And even with the valley's high -priority water rights, "those rights are not really going to do much for us if the river runs dry." 318 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 13/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times "It's definitely going to affect our area if people continue to be irresponsible," she said. "Sooner rather than later, people are going to start regretting what they did." �.1 The La Quinta City Council recently rejected a developer's proposal for a large wave pool and surf park on this property. (Carolyn Cole / Los Angeles Times) ik COLORADO RIVER IN CRISIS The Times podcast: Colorado River in Crisis Part 1: A Dying River Part 2: The Source 319 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 14/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times Part 3: The Dam More to Read Part 4: The Tribe Part 5: The Valley Part 6: The End Follow The Project Groups call on Trump administration to curb wasteful use of Colorado River water May 6, 2025 More water recycling could help fix Colorado River shortfall. California has a ways to go, report says April 2, 2025 Hay grown for cattle consumes nearly half the water drawn from Colorado River, study finds March 28, 2024 Ian James - 4V Ian James is a reporter who focuses on water and climate change in California and the West. Before joining the Los Angeles Times in 2021, he was an environment reporter at the Arizona Republic and the Desert Sun. He previously worked for the 320 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 15/16 5/25/25, 6:26 AM Desert golf courses, fake lakes and the Colorado River crisis - Los Angeles Times Associated Press as a correspondent in the Caribbean and as bureau chief in Venezuela. Follow him on Bluesky @ ianj ames.bsky. social and on X @ByIanJames. Carolyn Cole Carolyn Cole is a former staff photographer for the Los Angeles Times. Her coverage of the civil crisis in Liberia won the 2004 Pulitzer Prize for feature photography. Cole has been named U.S. newspaper photographer of the year three times. Cole grew up in California and Virginia, before attending the University of Texas, where she earned a bachelor's degree in journalism. She went on to earn a master of art's degree from Ohio University. Copyright © 2025, Los Angeles Times I Terms of Service I Privacy Policy I CA Notice of Collection I Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information 321 https://www.lati mes.com/envi ron ment/story/2023-01-29/colorado-river-i n-crisis-desert-lakes-and-golf-courses 16/16 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT DRAFT EI P SCH# 2021020310 TECHNICAL APPENDICES Coral Mountain Peso rt Notice of Preparation Appendix A June 2021 CITY OF LA QUINTA NOTICE OF PREPARATION Project Title: Coral Mountain Resort Project Location: Within the City of La Quinta, the project encompasses an area of approximately 929 acres south of Avenue 58, north of Avenue 60, and east and west of Madison Street. As a part of the proposed project, the 386-acre portion of the site west of Madison Street is proposed to be removed from the existing Andalusia Specific Plan (SP 03-067) and developed under Specific Plan 2019-0003. This area is generally bounded by the Avenue 58 to the north; Madison Street to the east; the extension of Avenue 60 to the south; and Coral Mountain to the west. Located in portions of Section 27 and 28, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Base Line and Meridian; Latitude 331 37' 15" N Longitude 1161 15' 21" W (approximate geographic center of the site). Project Description: The proposed project u 60THAVENUE would result in the development of a master planned resort community, and the removal of the 386-acre development site from the existing 929-acre Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan. The project proposes to develop the 386-acre site with a mix of uses including up to 600 dwelling units of varying product types, a resort facility with up to 150 rooms, 57,000 square feet of tourist commercial uses, 60,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial uses, and open space recreational uses on approximately 23.6 acres. In addition, the project proposes a 16.62-acre artificial wave basin for recreational purposes. The project consists of the following entitlement applications: a General Plan Amendment (GPA 2019-0002), a Zone Change (ZC 2019-0004), a Specific Plan Amendment to SP 03- 067, a Specific Plan (SP 2019-0003), a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 2019-0005), and a Site Development Permit (SDP) for a portion of the project consisting of an artificial wave basin. The City of La Quinta, acting as the Lead Agency, has determined that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) should be prepared for the proposed project. The EIR will be prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the project. This Notice of Preparation also solicits comments and questions from responsible agencies, trustee agencies, federal, State and local agencies and the general public, on the scope and content of the environmental document to be prepared to analyze the potential environmental impacts of the proposed project. Comments received in response to this Notice of Preparation will be reviewed and considered in determining the scope of the EIR. 323 The time period to submit comments will begin February 17, 2021 and will end March 19, 2021. Comments and questions may be directed to: Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253, or consulting plan ner@laquintaca.gov. Please include the name, phone number, and address of your agency's contact person in your response. PUBLISH ONCE ON FEBRUARY 16, 2021 1/8 PAGE DISPLAYAD 324 [to]AMa0 [•il]a&IIMZM1101:iI 1.0 INTRODUCTION The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, Riverside County. Exhibit 1, Regional Location Map, shows the City's location within the larger Coachella Valley region. The project site encompasses an area of approximately 929 acres in the southeastern portion of the City of La Quinta. As shown in Exhibit 2, Vicinity Map, the local area is characterized as a developing area with a number of golf course and residential communities to the north, west, east, and southeast, the Santa Rosa Mountains to the west and south, and open space and the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) percolation ponds to the south. Exhibit 3, Site Location Map, displays an aerial view of the project site, outlining section lines, project boundary, adjacent roadways and neighboring communities. In addition to the Santa Rosa Mountains to the west and south, Coral Mountain is situated within the southwest portion of the project property. The proposed project includes a General Plan Amendment, Change of Zone, Specific Plan Amendment and new Specific Plan, as well as a Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Permit(s) leading to the development of a mix of uses including residential, resort, commercial, and recreational uses on 386 acres. The project proposes 496 low density residential units on approximately 232.3 acres, a full -service resort hotel (up to 150 keys), 104 resort residential units, and 57,000 square feet of resort commercial uses on approximately 120.8 acres, 60,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial uses on 7.7 acres, and open space recreational uses on 23.6 acres. Additionally, an artificial Wave basin is proposed on approximately 16.62 acres of the site. The site is currently included in a previously approved specific plan titled "Amendment IV of Andalusia at Coral Mountain." Amendment IV's Specific Plan consists of approximately 929 acres located south of Avenue 58, west of Monroe Street, north of Avenue 60, and both east and west of Madison Street. Amendment IV was approved in 2017 and separated the project into two distinct communities: Andalusia East (the area east of Madison Street) and Andalusia West (the area west of Madison Street and the proposed project area). Andalusia East, under Amendment IV, is currently under development, providing low density residential units, an 18-hole golf course, a clubhouse and associated amenities. Andalusia West, under Amendment IV, is currently undeveloped, but proposed residential and golf course uses In order to achieve the land use goals of the properties east and west of Madison Street, the two areas are to be separated and governed by two specific plans. Amendment V of SP 03-067 removes the area west of Madison Street and covers the area east of Madison Street. No changes to the land uses, development standards or guidelines are proposed, and build out of SP 03-067 Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 1 Febraury 2021 325 on the east side of Madison Street will proceed as currently planned. The approximately 386-acre area west of Madison Street will be governed by the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan, a new Specific Plan that will address only the westerly area. The Applicant is also requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment (GPA 2019-0002), a Zone Change (ZC 2019-0004), a Specific Plan Amendment, a Specific Plan (SP 2019-0003), a Tentative Tract Map (TTM 2019-0005), and a Site Development Permit (SDP). The GPA will amend the current General Plan land use designations to reflect the land use designations required for implementation of Specific Plan 2019-0003, and include General Commercial, Low Density Residential, Open Space — Recreation, and Tourist Commercial. The ZC will revise the existing zoning of the Specific Plan area to Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, Parks and Recreation, and Tourist Commercial. The Specific Plan Amendment (SPA) will separate the west 386 acres from the existing Specific Plan (SP 03-067). The Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan (SP 2019-0003) will be adopted as the master plan governing the allowable land uses, development standards and design guidelines for the project. The proposed Tentative Tract Map will subdivide the subject property into separate legal lots to facilitate development of the proposed uses, and the proposed SDP will detail the site plan, architectural designs and landscape plans for the artificial wave basin. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 2 Febraury 2021 326 DDE r ;solii �_1_4 PALM SPRINGS CATHEDRAL CITY rRANCHOAa N.T.S. PALM DESERT MSA CONSULTING, INC(@ , PLANNING , CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com INDIAN WELLS LA QUINTA Project Site 0 �. 10 COACHELLA REGIONAL LOCATION MAP CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXHIBIT 327 52ND AVENUE — .\ vy ,� w CITY LA QUINTA WL 54TH AVENUE LU w w O INS W b OULEVAR COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE AVENUE 5 SITE AMENDMENT V OF SP 03-067 k � AVENUE 60 Legend: Project Boundary Existing City / County Boundary N.T.S. EXHIBIT MSA CONSULTING, INC. VICINITY MAP >PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERINSURVEYING CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT 2 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CAA92270 92270 760.320.9811 mSaConsultinglnaCom ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 328 Legend: Project Boundary — rt"t_I► AVENUE 58-:__:_- :__:__ �1 I yAI I PROJECT SITE oil AMENDMENT V OF SP 03-067 NII of 1 � ���--AVENUE 60 - w w w O z W II 1 1 1 1 sch - 11. N.T.S. EXHIBIT MSA CONSULTING, INC 0 SITE LOCATION MAP , PLANNING, CIVIL ENGINEERING, LAND SURVEYING 3 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT 750.320.5811 msaconsultinginc.com ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 329 1.1 Project Site Location As shown in Exhibit 2, Vicinity Map, and Exhibit 3, Site Location Map, the approximately 386- acre portion of the project site to be developed under SP 2019-0003 is generally bounded by vacant land and Avenue 58 on the north; Madison Street on the east; residential estates, vacant land, and the Avenue 60 alignment on the south; and Coral Mountain, and vacant land to the west. Further discussion of the land uses adjacent and in proximity to the project property is included in the following section, Surrounding Land Uses. The project is located in portions of Section 27 and 28, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Base Line and Meridian; and at Latitude 33' 37' 15" N, Longitude 116' 15' 21" W (approximate geographic center of the site). 1.2 Surrounding Land Uses Land uses surrounding the project site are as follows (see the aerial photograph in Exhibit 2): Direction Description North • Avenue 58 • Vacant Land • Developed and Undeveloped Single Family Residential Communities • Golf Course East • Madison Street • Single Family Residences in Andalusia Country Club • Golf Course in Andalusia • Vacant lands South • Avenue 60 • Developed and Undeveloped Single Family Residences and Communities • Golf Course, including Trilogy • Vacant Land • CVWD Levee West • Coral Mountain • Natural Open Space Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 6 Febraury 2021 330 2.0 Project Site History The project property was originally included as part of the "Rancho La Quinta Specific Plan", first approved in 1988 by Riverside County. The Specific Plan area was later annexed to the City of La Quinta. The area south of Avenue 58 and north of Avenue 60 became known as the "Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan 03-067" and included areas east and west of Madison Street. Since then, the property has gone through various entitlement activities and four specific plan amendments as part of the Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan (SP 03-067), summarized in Table 1, below: Table 1 Specific Plan Summary 1988-2017 Specific Plan Name Year Summary Supporting Documents Approved Rancho La Quinta 1988 Original Specific Plan approved by Riverside County EIR Rancho La Quinta Specific Plan 218 Board of Supervisors; included a maximum SCH #1987071302 (County of Riverside) development of 4,262 dwelling units, 380 acres of golf and 35 acres of commercial uses. Coral Mountain 2000 Reduced development intensity by 762 dwelling TTM 2002-149 TTM Specific Plan 218, units and 25.8 acres of commercial uses to up to 2002-12 Amendment 1 3,500 dwelling units and 9.2 acres of commercial (County of Riverside) uses. Coral Mountain 2003 Changed name to "Coral Mountain" Specific Plan; GPA 2003-093; CZ Specific Plan split specific plan into two specific plans: Trilogy 2003-116; Specific Plan Amendment II (City (522 acres) and Andalusia (934-acres); Supersedes 2003-067; Site of La Quinta) Coral Mountain Specific Plan 218 for Andalusia Development Permit area. Environmental Assessment 2003-483 2003-787; EA 2003-483 approved Amendment III of 2013 Relocated golf clubhouse and provided higher Coral Mountain SP density around golf course. Amendment IV of 2017 Revised development standards in Planning Area 11 Andalusia at Coral to allow for attached/detached residential villas of Mountain up to 2 stories. The eastern half of the previous iteration of the Specific Plan is being developed with the Andalusia Country Club while the western half has remained vacant. Exhibit 4, Existing General Plan Land Use Map, illustrates the project's existing General Plan land use designation. Approval of the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan will establish a new master plan and development standards for the property west of Madison Street to allow creation of a boutique resort and master -planned community. Concurrently, Amendment V of Specific Plan 03-067 is being processed to remove the western half such that only the Andalusia Country Club east of Madison Street will remain. This will create two separate and distinct communities, "Coral Mountain Resort", west of Madison Street, and "Andalusia Country Club", east of Madison Street. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 7 Febraury 2021 331 Legend: Project Boundary Low Density Residential Medium/High Density Residential General Commercial Open Space - Natural Open Space - Recreation l`\\Il�y a vRI N.T.S. MSA CONSULTING, INC. EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE EXHIBIT > PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING 4 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT 760.320.9811 m53Con5ultinglnGCom (D ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 332 3.0 PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN 3.1 Project Objectives The Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan serves as an overall framework to conscientiously guide development of the proposed project. To ensure the functional integrity, economic viability, environmental sensitivity, and positive aesthetic impact of this Specific Plan, planning and development goals for the project were established and supported through an extensive analysis. This analysis includes an examination of project environmental constraints, engineering feasibility, market acceptance, economic viability, City General Plan goals, development phasing, and local community goals. The Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan has identified the following Project objectives: • To implement a plan that recognizes and responds to the natural and aesthetic character of the property. • To create a private resort community with a variety of interrelated and mutually supportive commercial and recreational land uses that will also generate transient occupancy and sales tax revenues to enhance the City's economic base and long-term financial stability. • To promote walkability and non -motorized connectivity as an integral part of the project design. • To maintain the overall density count previously included for this property in the Andalusia Specific Plan. The following project objectives have been identified for the EIR: • To contribute to the reduction of air emissions generated within the City. • To contribute to the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions generated within the City. • Provide a regulatory framework that facilitates and encourages energy and water conservation through sustainable site planning, project design, and green technologies and building materials. • Assist in the protection and preservation of cultural resources. • Contribute to the preservation, conservation and management of the City's open space lands and scenic resources for enhanced recreation, environmental and economic purposes. • Provide protection of the health and safety, and welfare of the community from flooding and hydrological hazards. • Provide a healthful noise environment which complements the City's residential and Resort/Spa character. • Provide housing opportunities that meet the diverse needs of the City's existing and projected population. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 9 Febraury 2021 333 • Provide a circulation system that promotes and enhances alternative vehicle, bicycle, and pedestrian systems. • Provide domestic water, sewer and flood control infrastructure and services which adequately serve the project development. 3.2 Project Description As stated in Section 2.0, Project Site History, the project site is currently a part of the "Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan 03-067", which includes the area south of Avenue 58 and east and west of Madison Street. The area east of Madison Street encompasses the Andalusia Country Club property, and the area west of Madison Street is currently vacant. Amendment V of Specific Plan 03-067 is being processed to remove the area west of Madison Street from the Specific Plan area, thus, creating two separate and distinct communities, "Coral Mountain Resort", west of Madison Street, and "Andalusia Country Club", east of Madison Street. Approval of the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan will establish a new master plan and development standards for the 386-acre property west of Madison Street to allow creation of a boutique resort and master -planned community. The Coral Mountain Resort project ("project") will result in a variety of land uses, as shown in Exhibit 5, Proposed General Plan Land Use Map. Low Density Residential land uses will occupy approximately 232.3 acres and result in a maximum of 496 dwelling units. Tourist Commercial land uses will result in 104 dwelling units, 150 hotel rooms, and 57,000 square feet of private resort -serving commercial uses available to residents and hotel guests, on approximately 120.8 acres. General Commercial land uses will occupy approximately 7.7 acres with up to 60,000 square feet of retail commercial uses available to the general public. Open Space Recreation land uses will occur on approximately 23.6 acres in the southwest portion of the site. Table 2, Proposed Land Use Summary, shows the land use associated with each planning area. Exhibit 7, Planning Area Land Use Plan, shows the location of each project planning area. Table 2 Proposed Land Use Summary Planning Area (PA) Land Use Category Gross Land Area (Acres) Non- Residential Building (SF) Max. Dwelling Units (DU) Max. Hotel/Resort Units (DU) PA I GC 7.7 60,000' PA II LDR 232.3 496 PA III TC 120.8 57,0002 104 150 PA IV OS-R 23.6 Right of Way 1.5 Total 385.9 117,000 600 150 Note: GC = General Commercial, LDR = Low Density Residential, TC = Tourist Commercial, OS-R = Open Space Recreation Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 10 Febraury 2021 334 1. Consisting of retail commercial uses available to the general public. 2. Consisting of private resort -serving commercial uses available only to residents and hotel guests. In addition to the proposed onsite development, project implementation will also include the installation of an off -site transformer bank at an existing IID substation, located at 81600 Avenue 58, as part of the proposed upgrades. Construction for the conduits and line extension would occur in the existing right-of-way. Project Construction According to the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, project construction will occur in eight (8) primary development areas with buildout anticipated to occur in three primary phases over approximately 4- to 6-years. Each primary development area may be broken into subphases in response to market conditions and consumer demand. For example, the hotel of up to 150 keys may be constructed in multiple subphases. Exhibit 6, Conceptual Development Plan, reflects the anticipated construction sequence and may be non -sequential and adjusted subject to market conditions (so long as necessary utilities and access are provided). Phased development will be accompanied by the orderly extension of circulation and parking facilities, public utilities, and infrastructure in accordance with the final conditions of approval for the project. Phasing is conceptual and subject to refinement with final engineering design and changes in sequence in response to market conditions. The applicant proposes to commence construction of the Wave Basin first due to the longer construction timelines associated with this component of the project, compared to the other uses within the Specific Plan. Accordingly, a Site Development Permit (SDP) for the Wave Basin is being processed concurrently with the initial entitlements, with one or more SDPs for other Planning Areas within the Tourist Commercial and Low Density Residential land use development areas (designated as Phase 2 on Exhibit 6) being filed prior to final approval of the Wave Basin SDP. The Wave Basin SDP map is illustrated in Exhibit 7, Wave Basin SDP Map. Following this entitlement and construction schedule, it is anticipated that the Wave Basin and other Tourist Commercial and Residential land uses will be completed and ready for occupancy at approximately the same time. Project Components The project components shall include: • 600 Dwelling Units of varying types 0 496 single family attached and detached dwellings and affiliated amenities (Low Density Residential land use) o Low Density Residential product types may include estate compounds, single-family Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 11 Febraury 2021 335 detached/attached units, alley loaded homes, and clustered products 0 104 resort residential units (Tourist Commercial land use) o Resort residential product types may include single family detached units, townhomes, and stacked flats • 60,000 square feet of publicly accessible neighborhood commercial building space • 150-key resort with customary resort amenities o The Resort Hotel will provide a hospitality component, with amenities such as a restaurant and bar, retail shop, meeting space, swimming pool, fitness center, spa and lodging. o Lodging options will provide a range of traditional hotel rooms, suites, and casitas. • 57,000 square feet of resort -serving commercial and recreational building space o Residents and guests of the property will have exclusive use of resort commercial. • The Wave Basin o 16.62-acre artificial surf Wave basin o Residents and guests of the property will have exclusive use of Wave basin • 26.5 acres south of the Wave basin o Providing permanent service and administrative facilities and unprogrammed gathering and staging space for temporary equipment such as portable toilets, shade structures, tenting for inclement weather, and catering equipment. • Approximately 24 acres of natural open space for low -impact active and passive recreation activities. o Including hiking, biking, and ropes courses. • Special events o The project applicant anticipates the potential occurrence of special events involving attendance of up to 2,500 guests per day for up to 4 days (up to 4 events per year). Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 12 Febraury 2021 336 Legend: 0 Project Boundary General Commercial 77 Low Density Residential Tourist Commercial Open Space (Recreation) Pk%.L ,TION LN AVENUE 58 1 1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL 1 1 1 2 ♦ O_ O •Z LOW DENSITY / • RESIDENTIAL •m m � 1 � 1 TOURIST v - — IMMERCIAL MSA CONSULTING, INC.(@ , PLANNING ,CIVIL ENGINEERINC> LAND SUPVEYINC 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com RIST L 1 1 1 r AVENUE 60 PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXHIBIT 5 337 Legend: - - Project Boundary Phase Boundary — — — — — Development Area Boundary Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 AVENUE 58 - � 1 - 7- 7 Notes: 1. Phasing plan reflects the anticipated construction 7 sequence. It Is conceptual and subject to refinement in response to market conditions. 2. Numbers 1 - 8 indicate Development Areas. 1 � D I / PHASE 2 5 9- ■ 1� �r AVENUE 60 ti0 R 1 N.T.S. EXHIBIT MSA CONSULTING, INC. CONCEPTUAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN > PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERINSURVEYING CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CAA92270 92270 760.320.9811 msaeonsultingine.eom ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 0 338 AVENUE 58 PROPOSED WAVE BASIN ACCESS ENTRY (PRIMARY) 02 I I ACCESS ROAD L I I I PROPOSED WAVE BASIN AVENUE 60 ACCESS ENTRY (SECONDARY) NOTE: ADDITIONAL CONSTRUCTION ACCESS MAY BE ADDED IN A LOCATION SUBJECT TO CITY APPROVAL. N.T.S. EXHIBIT MSA CONSULTING, INC. WAVE BASIN SDP > PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERINSURVEYING CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CAA92270 92270 760.320.9811 msaeonsultingine.eom ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 339 3.3 Planning Areas The project proposes the development of four planning areas, defined in this section. Table 3, below, indicates each planning area, and their proposed acreages, and dwelling units. Exhibit 8, Planning Area Land Use Plan, illustrates the proposed planning area locations Table 3 Proposed Planning Area Summary PA Land Use (Zone)' Acres Commercial (SF) Max. Units I Neighborhood Commercial (CN) 7.7 60,000 SF 11 Low Density Residential (RL) 232.3 496 Units III Resort (TC) 111-A: Resort Hotel 8.5 150 rooms 111-B: The Wave 31.22 111-C: Wave Club 3.2 111-D: Resort Residential West 40.5 104 units 111-E: Resort Residential East 111-F: The Farm 11 111-G: Back of House 26.5 PA III Total acreage 120.8 57,000 SF IV Open Space Recreational (PR) 23.6 Roads 1.6 Total 386 60,000 CN 57,000 TC 600 DU 150 rooms Zone Codes: Neighborhood Commercial = CN; Low Density Residential = RL; Tourist Commercial = TC; Parks and Recreation = PR 2. The Wave Subarea is 31.2 acres and contains a 16.62-acre artificial surf wave basin. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 16 Febraury 2021 340 Legend: Project Boundary Planning Area Boundary — — — — — Planning Area Sub -Boundary Neighborhood Commercial Low Density Residential Resort Open Space (Recreation) III-C ■ I ■ ■ PA I OPEN SPACE AVENUE 58 :.. _.. ■ ■ N M ■ ■ oo VA �Z $ O vv PA 11 \\\\ LOW DENSITY O RESIDENTIAL ♦ Z i � ■m m PA III � RESORT III-B �\ MSA CONSULTING, INC.(@ , PLANNING ,CIVIL ENGINEERINC> LANDSURVEYINC 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com III -A PA �O I OD /I M ■ AVENUE 60 PLANNING AREA LAND USE PLAN CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT '$ R 'I N.T.S. EXHIBIT 1 341 3.5 Circulation Plan The circulation plan for the project proposes a multi -modal approach providing transportation facilities within the Specific Plan area for a variety of user groups including motorists, cyclists, pedestrians, and drivers of electric vehicles, thereby decreasing automobile dependency. Convenient access and parking are planned in close proximity to retail and resort areas. The internal system of private local roadways will allow residents of individual neighborhoods to access all Planning Areas internally without exiting onto surrounding public streets. The project's multi -modal transportation system will consist of sidewalks, multi -use trails, and shared use of low -speed, low -volume roadways, specifically including: off-street bicycle and pedestrian paths/routes; sidewalks in higher traffic areas; pedestrian/bicycle crosswalks; pedestrian and multi -use paths and streets; traffic calming methods; short street segments with frequent caution zones and stopping points; and golf cart routes and other alternative forms of personal transportation. Vehicular Circulation Vehicular access to the project site will utilize existing public arterial roads, including Avenue 58, and Madison Street. These roads are largely improved to their ultimate lane width, needing only the addition of minor widening, a meandering multi -purpose trail, sidewalks, and parkway landscaping along the boundary of the Specific Plan area. The surrounding roadways will be improved to the standards of the City of La Quinta General Plan Circulation Element. The internal circulation system will consist of a series of roads providing access to the individual residential and recreational components within the Specific Plan area. The proposed internal rights of way will vary from 32-foot/33-foot private drives to the 100-foot entry drive. As shown in Exhibit 9, Circulation Plan, the interior street system proposed for the project is an internal system of private streets linking all neighborhoods to provide open circulation. Per Exhibit 9, the project proposes various road categories and rights -of -way. These include the Entry Drive, Local Road "A", Resort Drive, and Resort Commercial Drive. The Entry Drive is the main entry off of Madison Street that provides access to the resort area. Local Roads branch off of the primary entry drives and link residential and resort residential areas to the Entry Drive. Resort Drives are open to the guests and residences of the community to convey vehicles, pedestrians, and bicycles throughout the project. A secondary entrance is provided from Avenue 60. The project site is bordered on the north and east sides by public streets designated as Secondary Arterials in the City of La Quinta General Plan. The segment of Avenue 60 located south of the project site is designated as a Collector Road. The project provides access to the Neighborhood Commercial in Planning Area I with a primary public entry from Madison Street, two public entries from Avenue 58 and one from the Entry Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 18 Febraury 2021 342 Drive. Entries to residential neighborhoods will be provided from the primary entry drive and their conceptual locations illustrated in Exhibit 9. Non -Vehicular Circulation Non -vehicular circulation proposed for the project is intended to include multi -use trails, sidewalks, walk streets, and a boardwalk feature. The features are described as follows: - Multi -Use Trail: An 8-foot-wide multi -use trail along the main spine road to provide future neighborhoods with a central bike and pedestrian connection to the resort core as well as the main entry gate. - Sidewalk: Sidewalks are included along key streets in the resort core to provide a completely interconnected pedestrian grid experience so that resort guests can walk or bike to all activities at the wave basin and resort facilities. - Walk Streets: Designed as narrow walkways between homes, Walk Streets provide connectivity with immediate residential frontage. The Walk Street network is one of the primary organizing components of the community plan. Terminating at the boardwalk, Walk Streets link residents to The Wave, The Farm, and the greater network of trails and open spaces, enabling movement throughout the community. - The Boardwalk: The Wave basin and its integrated pedestrian boardwalk is the terminus for nearly all the Walk Streets — functioning as a gathering space as well as an active recreational amenity. Exhibit 10, Non -Vehicular Circulation Plan, illustrates the proposed locations for the multi -use trail, connecting boardwalk feature, sidewalks, and walk streets. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 19 Febraury 2021 343 Legend: Project Boundary i Conceptual Residential Entry Point Conceptual Residential Gated Entry Point 24' Right of Way: Entry Drive 24' Right of Way: Local Road "A" 24' Right of Way: Resort Drive 26' Right of Way: Resort / Commercial Drive 32' Right of Way: Resort / Commercial Drive 40' Right of Way: Entry Drive 40' Right of Way: Resort Drive 60' Right of Way: Resort Drive � r R AVENUE 58 ■ ■ Notes: 1. Conceptual residential entry points ■ ■ reflect anticipated locations only. Entry locations are conceptual and subject to refinement as the project is built out. ■ 2. Local Road Sections "B" and "C" ■ ■ (not shown) may be used in future ■ development areas. N�a ,'% 0„ MSA CONSULTING, INC. > PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com 0 ■ AVENUE 60 OOR 'f N.T.S. VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXHIBIT We 344 Legend: Project Boundary # # Multi -Use Trail MSA CONSULTING, INC. > PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING> LAND SURVEYING 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com 0 11 C AI I I C C O V C 1V V C U V NON -VEHICULAR CIRCULATION PLAN CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 345 3.6 Infrastructure Plan The infrastructure system planned to serve the project described below will be designed to provide a coordinated system of infrastructure and public services to adequately serve the project area at full buildout. The project will be served by the following utilities: - Water and Sewer: Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) - Electricity: Imperial Irrigation District (IID) - Gas: Southern California Gas Company Water and Sewer Water and sewer service for the Specific Plan area are provided by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The CVWD provides domestic water from wells. Non -potable water sources are intended to be used for the irrigation of common landscape areas. The project proposes to connect to the existing water lines located on Avenue 58 (north) and Madison Street (east). The proposed water lines will consist of 18-inch, 12-inch, and 8-inch public water lines. Sewer lines in the area currently exist along Avenue 58 and along a portion of Avenue 60 (southeast of the project). The project proposes 15-inch, 12-inch and 8-in sewer lines that will connect to the existing sewer lines and provide sewer service to the project. The project will conform to the requirements of the CVWD's programs and requirements pertaining to water management and conservation. See Exhibit 11 for the Conceptual Water Plan and Exhibit 12 for the Conceptual Sewer Plan. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 22 Febraury 2021 346 Legend: w m � Project Boundary ■w= — — Existing Water Main ® Proposed C.V.W.D. Well Site Proposed Public 8" Water Main �12w— j Proposed Public 12" Water Main =78w= I Proposed Public 18" Water Main Notes: 1. Information shown is conceptual only. Final engineering design plans may deviate. 2. Number and location of wells is preliminary & subject to further discussion with C.V.W.D. MSA CONSULTING, INC.(@ , PLANNING ,CIVIL ENGINEERING> LAND SURVEYING 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 760.320.9811 msaconsultingino.00m _ _AVENUE N58 Wi i ■ � 1 3 �r AVENUE 60 N.T.S. CONCEPTUAL WATER PLAN CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT EXHIBIT 347 Legend: w m � Project Boundary —s — Existing Sewer Main Proposed 8" Sewer Main �12S— Proposed 12" Sewer Main =15S— Proposed 15" Sewer Main Note: Information shown is conceptual only. Final engineering design plans may deviate. 1 I i —N I 'OOR I N.T.S. i A YENS E 58� � �s s l AVENUE 60 s— —s— EXHIBIT MSA CONSULTING, INC.@ CONCEPTUAL SEWER PLAN > PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING 1 1/'00 Bob Hope Delve, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT 1 760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 348 Grading and Drainage As shown in Exhibit 13, Conceptual Drainage Plan, the project includes a comprehensive drainage system that collects storm flows, retains the incremental post -development increase and discharges surface water at pre -development levels to protect individual residences, the resort, and commercial uses as well as downstream properties. Surface drainage will be conveyed by the local street system from development areas to a system of basins and underground storm drains. As illustrated in the conceptual drainage plan, multiple retention basins and lakes (including the Wave), will be used to convey and safely capture surface flows. Retention basins will be constructed and sized to retain the worst -case flood volume from a 100- year storm event. These basins will also include water quality elements that serve as structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) in accordance with the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS-4) Whitewater River Watershed Municipal Stormwater Program. Off -Site Electrical Improvements Electric utilities for the site are provided by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). The project EIR will analyze the improvements in further detail. Exhibit 14, Off -Site Electrical Improvements, illustrates the location of the existing substation and proposed distribution line(s) and upgrades. Other Utilities The site is within the Southern California Gas Company's service area for natural gas, and Frontier and Charter Communications for telecommunications. The project will tie into the existing cable, gas and telecommunications lines located along Avenue 58 and Madison Street. The project will not require or result in the relocation or construction of new natural gas, or telecommunication facilities. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 25 Febraury 2021 349 Legend: Project Boundary 1i Water Feature / Retention ® Conceptual Drainage Sub -Area Conceptual 100-Year Sub -Area Retention ■ Site Drainage Flows Off -Site Drainage Direction Note: Drainage and retention is conceptual and subject to refinement with final engineering design. ■ �® MSA CONSULTING, INC. (a > PLANNING > CIVIL ENGINEERING > LAND SURVEYING 34200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 760.320.9811 msaconsultinginc.com M AVENUE 58 _ i:77 ■ 4000 . Z \ �1 -A Eno ■ I L I; �r AVENUE 60 .0 C�. CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 40Rl�` N.T.S. EXHIBIT 13 350 Legend: Project Boundary Proposed Conduit System 3 Proposed Transformer Bank EXISTING I.I.D. SUBSTATION AVENUE 60 tiO R4�` N.T.S. EXHIBIT MSA CONSULTING, INC. OFF -SITE ELECTRICAL IMPROVEMENTS > PLANNING I CIVIL ENGINEERING> LAND SURVEYING 14 11200 Bob Hope Drive, Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT 760320.9811 nlsaconsultinglnc.com ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT 351 3.7 Project Implementation Implementation of the proposed project includes the approval of the following entitlement processes: General Plan Amendment (GPA) - The GPA will amend the current General Plan land use designations from General Commercial, Low Density Residential, Open Space — Recreation, to Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, Resort, and Open Space - Recreation. The GPA requires public hearings before the Commission and the Council. Zone Change (ZC) - The ZC will revise the existing zoning of the Specific Plan Area from Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, and Golf Course, to Neighborhood Commercial (CN), Low Density Residential (RL), Parks and Recreation (PR), and Tourist Commercial (TC). The ZC requires public hearings before the Commission and Council. Specific Plan (SP) — The Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan will be adopted as the master plan governing the allowable land uses, development standards and design guidelines for the project. The SP requires public hearings before the Planning Commission (Commission) and the City Council (Council). Tentative Tract Map (TTM) — TTMs are intended to implement the project and subdivide the property into smaller lots for development. The TTM which is currently under consideration will implement the Specific Plan and subdivide all of PA III, the Wave resort, and the western corner of PA II into lots suitable for the development of the uses permitted for these areas in the Specific Plan. Future TTMs may be filed with each phase of development as necessary to implement the balance of the project. Each TTM will require review by the Planning Commission. Site Development Permit (SDP): SDPs are required by the City for final approval of landscape design, architectural design, and site plans. An SDP for the Wave Basin is being sought in connection with the current entitlements, and will establish the location, architectural design and landscape plan for the Wave Basin along with associated mechanical equipment and improvements (Planning Area III-B). Future entitlements for project -specific components will also include: Site Development Permit (SDP): Additional SDPs will be required by the City for final approval of landscape design, architectural design, and site plans for each phase of development. These may be processed concurrent with or subsequent to other entitlement approvals. Each SDP will require public hearings before the Commission. Conditional Use Permit (CUP): Allowable uses that require a CUP shall be processed in accordance with Section 9.210.020 of the La Quinta Municipal Code. Temporary Use Permit (TUP): TUPs are required by the City to accommodate special, unique, or limited duration activities that might otherwise be outside the provisions of normal zoning. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 28 Febraury 2021 352 Temporary uses are anticipated and allowed by the Specific Plan. TUPs are reviewed administratively by the Design and Development Director and do not require a public hearing. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 29 Febraury 2021 353 4.0 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) As stated in the section, 3.6, Project Implementation, the Applicant is requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use Map for the project area to General Commercial, Low Density Residential, Tourist Commercial, and Open Space Recreation; a Zone Change to revise the City's Zoning Map to Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, Parks and Recreation, and Tourist Commercial; a Specific Plan (SP); a Tentative Tract Map (TTM); and a Site Development Permit (SDP) for the Wave basin.. 4.1 Need for an EIR The City of La Quinta, as Lead Agency under CEQA, has determined that the project has the potential to significantly impact the environment, and has determined that an EIR shall be prepared. The EIR will be prepared in conformance with CEQA (California Public Resources Code, Section 21000, et seq.), and the CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Section 15000, et seq.). The EIR will evaluate the environmental effects of the project in accordance with the latest regulatory requirements, determine whether significant impacts will occur, identify feasible mitigation measures to minimize or avoid any potentially significant environmental effects of the proposed project, and evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project. 4.2 Summary of Environmental Issues The EIR will evaluate all environmental issues set forth in the CEQA Environmental Checklist (per Appendix G of the CEQA Guidelines) where the project could potentially have any significant effects. The issue areas that will be evaluated in the Draft EIR include: • Aesthetics • Geology and Soils • Noise • Air Quality • Greenhouse Gases • Public Services • Biological Resources • Hazards/Hazardous Materials • Transportation • Cultural Resources • Hydrology and Water Quality • Tribal Cultural Resources • Energy Resources • Land Use and Planning • Utilities The environmental topics that are not anticipated to result in any impacts include Agricultural Resources, Mineral Resources, Population and Housing, Recreation, and Wildfire (discussed in subsections 4.2.2, 4.2.11, 4.2.13, 4.2.15, and 4.2.18, respectively). Therefore, these sections will not be further discussed in the Draft EIR. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 30 Febraury 2021 354 4.2.1 Aesthetics The City of La Quinta is located along the base of the Santa Rosa Mountains that form the backdrop to the City's western boundary and the project site. The Santa Rosa Mountains and their foothills and peaks are part of the Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains National Monument and contribute to the natural scenic vista. Coral Mountain occurs, in part, on the project site. The project will involve the construction of a mixed -use community consisting of residential units, general commercial uses, tourist commercial uses, a resort, open space recreational uses, as well as an artificial surf Wave basin. The proposed uses and structures would have a potential effect on aesthetic resources. Analysis of the impacts of existing aesthetic resources from adjacent viewpoints will be evaluated in the EIR. The proposed project's impact on existing scenic vistas as well as the scenic quality in the area will be evaluated in the EIR. This evaluation will analyze the proposed features, such as the Wave basin, associated structure heights, building character, mass and heights, and project landscaping. The proposed project will be required to comply with the lighting and landscape requirements City of La Quinta Municipal Code. On -site native environments have been modified by prior agricultural operations and clearing activities that occurred over multiple decades. Historic structures occur on the project site, as does the significant rock outcropping that is Coral Mountain. Therefore, the project's impact to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway will also be analyzed in the EIR. Development adjacent to the City of La Quinta General Planned Image Corridors located on Avenue 60, Madison Street, and Avenue 58 shall be restricted to a height limitation of 22 feet from pad grade within 150 feet from the right-of-way. Rear and side yard setbacks for lots adjacent to Image Corridors shall be expanded to a minimum of 25 feet per La Quinta Municipal Zoning Code Section 9.50.020. The project will introduce light and glare associated with commercial, residential and resort development to a site that is currently vacant and does not emit any light or glare. The project proposes a recreational Wave basin, including 80-foot light poles, to illuminate the Wave basin in the evenings. Therefore, potential light and glare impacts to daytime and nighttime views in the area as a result of project development will be analyzed in the EIR. The EIR will evaluate CEQA Guideline Thresholds "a" through "d" and mitigation measures will be developed, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.2 Agricultural Resources and Forestry Per the most recent (2016) California Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, the project site is located in an area designated as Farmland of Local Importance, but will not convert any Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use. According to the United States Geological Survey (USGS) 1959 topographic map, Palm Desert Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 31 Febraury 2021 355 Quadrangle (15-minute series), the project property previously operated as agricultural land, likely vineyards. Historical aerial imagery dating back from 1996 indicates that the site had been cleared of all agricultural remnants prior to 1996. The project site currently lies within a suburban area of La Quinta, with residential uses to the north, east and south. Additionally, the project area currently is designated Low Density Residential, Open Space Recreational and General Commercial by the City of La Quinta, and has been so designated since 1993 when the property was annexed to the City. The project site is not currently designated within an agriculture land use category and the site has not been in agricultural use for over 25 years. Overall, the project will not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide Importance to non-agricultural use. The project site is not in use as Farmland of Local Importance and is not planned for such use in the General Plan. The project property is not located in an area under the Williamson Act contract, and there are no lands within the Williamson Act contract in the immediate project vicinity. No forest land, timberland, or timberland zoned for timberland production occurs on the project site or in the surrounding area because forest vegetation is not characteristic of the Coachella Valley desert environment. Based on the foregoing, the project will not result in any impacts to agricultural and forestry resources, and the EIR will provide no further analysis of this topic. 4.2.3 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions The project site is located within the Riverside County portion of the Salton Sea Air Basin (SSAB), under the jurisdiction of the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). Existing air quality in relation to the applicable air quality standards for criteria air pollutants is measured at established air quality monitoring stations throughout the SCAQMD jurisdiction. The three permanent ambient air quality monitoring stations in the Coachella Valley are in Palm Springs (AQS ID 060655001), Indio (AQS ID 060652002), and Mecca (Saul Martinez - AQS ID 060652005). The project site is located approximately 18 miles southeast of the Palm Springs station, 6 miles southwest of the Indio station, and approximately 11 miles northwest of the Mecca (Saul Martinez) station. The project has the potential to generate criteria emissions and greenhouse gas emissions in excess of SCAQMD standards. The EIR analysis will include a stand-alone air quality study to evaluate whether construction and operation of the proposed development will comply with the applicable SCAQMD air quality standards. The EIR analysis will also include a greenhouse gas (GHG) study to evaluate project -related construction and operational emissions and determine the level of GHG impacts as a result of constructing and operating the proposed project. The EIR will provide an in-depth evaluation of CEQA Thresholds "a" through "d" regarding project impacts to air quality; and CEQA Thresholds "a" and "b" regarding project - Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 32 Febraury 2021 356 generated greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, mitigation measures will be developed, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.4 Biological Resources The Coral Mountain Resort property is located on relatively flat land within elevations ranging from approximately 72 feet below mean sea level to 65 feet above mean sea level. Vegetation within the study area is best described as Desert Saltbush scrub, Tamarisk scrub, and Mesquite Hummock. Land is disturbed in the southern and northeast portions of the study area and a stand of blue palo verde is present in the eastern portion of the study area. Dominant species include fourwind saltbush, bush seepweed, athel, and common Mediterranean grass (Schismus barbatus). The majority of the project area was previously agricultural land. As a result, the Desert Saltbush scrub is fairly disturbed throughout the project area. Common wildlife species expected on the project site include common raven, mourning dove, and greater roadrunner. A biological survey and records search is required to determine whether any sensitive or special status animal species are located within the boundary of the project site. The findings of the project -specific biological survey and records search will be fully addressed in the EIR. The project is not anticipated to have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities, since there are no jurisdictional waters and no lakes, rivers, or streambeds onsite. Additionally, the project property does not contain, nor is adjacent to, federally protected wetlands, marshes, or other drainage features. No blue -line stream corridors (streams or dry washes) occur in the project area, and the project would not impact federally protected wetlands. The project's consistency with adopted habitat policies and plans will be analyzed in the EIR, including the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP). In short, the project EIR will evaluate the findings of the project -specific biological survey and records search, and mitigation measures will be developed, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.5 Cultural Resources and Tribal Cultural Resources The EIR will include a project -specific Historical/Archaeological Resource Survey Report. The project area is located on the southcentral outskirts of the City and is adjacent to the eastern foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains, and includes a portion of a rocky knoll known as Coral Mountain. The ground surface in much of the project area has been disturbed to various Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 33 Febraury 2021 357 degrees, except for the portion in and around Coral Mountain. The northeast portion of the site does not appear to have been farmed but it has been cleared of vegetation. The analysis in the EIR will include a review of the project -specific cultural evaluation, an assessment of the potential impacts to cultural and tribal cultural resources associated with project construction, and the results of AB 52 consultation with Native American Tribes. Therefore, CEQA Guideline Thresholds "a", "b", and "c", regarding cultural resources, and Thresholds "a) i" and "a) ii", regarding Tribal Cultural Resources will be included in the EIR, and mitigation measures will be developed, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.6 Energy Resources The project will consist of residential, commercial, open space/recreational and resort uses. Low density residential uses will occupy approximately 232.3 acres of the site, commercial uses will occupy 7.7 acres, resort uses will occupy 120.8 acres, and the open space/recreational uses will occupy 23.6 acres of the project site. The project site, located at the southwest corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street, lies within the service area boundaries of Imperial Irrigation District (IID) for electricity and Southern California Gas Company for natural gas. As a part of project implementation, the project will be required to install an off -site transformer bank at an existing IID substation located at 81600 Avenue 58 as part of proposed upgrades. Construction for the conduits and line extension would occur in the existing right-of-way. The Coral Mountain Resort EIR will analyze project -related impacts to energy resources during construction activities and operation. The impacts of the offsite improvements will also be analyzed in the EIR. The EIR will evaluate CEQA Guideline Thresholds "a" and "b" to determine the project's potential energy impacts, and mitigation measures will be developed, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.7 Geology and Soils A site -specific Geotechnical Investigation is required for the project property, to investigate the geotechnical and soil conditions at the site. The project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo fault zone. However, seismic activity that may occur on either the San Andreas fault zone (approximately 7.75 miles northeast of the project site), or San Jacinto fault zone (approximately 14 miles southwest of the project site) could result in severe ground shaking. The California Building Code Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 34 Febraury 2021 358 contains specific requirements and standards to ensure safe building design. The EIR will evaluate the impacts of seismic hazards and geologic hazards at the project site. Therefore, CEQA Thresholds "a" through "d" will be analyzed in the EIR. Mitigation will be provided in the EIR, if necessary. The project is currently located within the Coachella Valley Water District's (CVWD) service area for water and sewer services. The project proposes to connect with the existing sewer infrastructure to provide sewer to the residents and guests of the proposed project. The project site will not use septic systems. Additionally, CVWD has sufficient capacity to treat effluent generated by the project. Further discussion regarding project -related sewer and wastewater use will be provided in the Utilities and Service Systems section of the EIR. Since the project will not use septic systems, CEQA Threshold "e" will not be analyzed in the EIR. In addition to the project -specific Geotechnical Investigation, a project specific Paleontological Resources Assessment will be included in the EIR to identify any significant, non-renewable paleontological resources that may exist within or adjacent to the project site. The findings of the Paleontological Resources Assessment will be analyzed in the CEQA Threshold "f" discussion of the EIR. Mitigation measures will be provided, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials Implementation of the project would facilitate new growth and development throughout the project area. Resort, commercial, residential, and recreational developments would result in an increased population of residents and non-residents that would have both the potential to be susceptible to hazards, and to utilize hazardous materials. The project site is located within the boundary of the Coachella Valley Unified School District. The closest school is the Westside Elementary School, located approximately 1.30 miles northeast of the project site at 82225 Airport Boulevard in Thermal. The project site is not located within one -quarter mile of an existing or proposed school; therefore, CEQA Threshold "c" will not be analyzed in the EIR. The project is not located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites, pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5, and therefore, CEQA Threshold "d" will not be analyzed in the EIR. Moreover, the closest airport to the proposed project is the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, located at 56-850 Higgins Drive in Thermal, California. The project is located approximately 4.25 miles west of the Airport, and outside of the Airport's Land Use Compatibility Zone. Therefore, CEQA Threshold "e" will not be analyzed in the EIR. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 35 Febraury 2021 359 Although the project will not result in impacts to CEQA Thresholds "c", "d", and "e", the EIR will analyze project -related impacts to the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials; the release of hazardous materials into the environment; the implementation of an emergency response or evacuation plan; and wildfire impacts (CEQA Thresholds "a", "b", "f", and "g". These topics will be discussed in detail, and mitigation measures will be developed, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.9 Hydrology and Water Quality The project site is defined by a relatively level terrain with scattered vegetation coverage. This setting occurs on the east side of Coral Mountain and two engineered flood control dikes (No. 2 and No. 4). The dikes form part of the regional flood control system and the planned Eastern Coachella Valley Stormwater Master Plan Project (Master Plan). The on -site conditions have been modified by prior agricultural operations and clearing activities that occurred over multiple decades. The site has also been altered by dirt roads, hiking paths, and various underground irrigation lines. Current on -site drainage is controlled via sheet flow generally trending from west to east. In addition to the on -site drainage conditions, vacant land and Coral Mountain west of the project are tributary to the project area. The off -site hillside portion of Coral Mountain primarily consists of rock outcrop, while the vacant land is relatively flat with conditions similar to those that occur on -site. The project site is covered by three Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Panels: 06065C2244H and 06065C2900H effective April 19, 2017, and 06065C2925H, effective March 6, 2018. Based on these sources, the project area is designated Zone X, an "area with reduced flood risk due to levee". The levee system being referenced includes Dike No. 2 and Dike No. 4 located west and upgradient of the project site. A project specific hydrology study will be prepared to analyze project on -site facilities and off - site tributary flows. The EIR analysis will consider how the flood protection solutions will be incorporated into the site design, storm drain infrastructure, and water quality management practices in relation to the applicable regulatory standards that apply during construction and operation of the proposed development. The EIR will analyze the project's site design measures to prevent interference with existing groundwater recharge facilities located south of the project. A Water Supply Assessment and Water Supply Verification has been completed and was adopted by CVWD in March 2020. This report analyzes the project demand for water and the supply availability for the project area. Its findings will be described in the EIR. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 36 Febraury 2021 360 The introduction of impervious land cover (i.e., roadways, hardscape, buildings) resulting from project implementation would result in an increase in the rate and amount of surface runoff produced by a site. The EIR will analyze the surface runoff generated by project implementation, and the proposed onsite stormwater retention system. The Coral Mountain Resort EIR will evaluate CEQA Guideline Thresholds "a" through "e" in order to determine project -related impacts to hydrology and water quality and mitigation measures will be developed, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.10 Land Use Planning The project site, located at the southwest corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street, is surrounded by developed residential communities to the north, east, and south, vacant land to the north, west and south, and Coral Mountain to the southwest. The surrounding developments are gated and operate separately from each other. The proposed project occurs on vacant land, and will not impact operation of surrounding residential projects, currently or in the future, and development of the proposed project will not divide an established community. Therefore, CEQA Threshold "a" regarding project land use and planning will not be analyzed in the Coral Mountain Resort EIR. The project will include a General Plan Amendment to revise the existing City of La Quinta General Plan Map to be consistent with the proposed land uses. The proposed project consists of a variety of land uses including Low Density Residential, Tourist Commercial, General Commercial, and Open Space Recreation. A Zone Change is required to revise the City's Zoning Map to be consistent with the proposed land uses. The EIR will analyze whether the proposed General Plan Amendment and Zone Change are consistent with the City's General Plan and zoning, in the discussion of CEQA Threshold "b", and mitigation measures will be developed, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.11 Mineral Resources Mineral resources found throughout the region include sand, gravel, crushed stone, copper, limestone, and tungsten. Many of these resources are important for common construction projects including asphalt, concrete, road base, stucco, and plaster. There are currently several active sand and gravel mines in the Coachella Valley, but none are in the City of La Quinta. Future mining within the City of La Quinta is unlikely due to existing urbanization. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 37 Febraury 2021 361 According to the Mineral Land Classification Map, the approximately 386-acre project site is located within Mineral Resource Zone 1 (MRZ-1) and Mineral Resource Zone 3 (MRZ-3). The northeast portion of the project is located with the MRZ-1 zone, which specifies areas where geologic information indicates no significant mineral deposits are present or likely to be present. The southwest portion of the project property is located within the MRZ-3 zone which indicates areas containing known or inferred mineral occurrences where the significance cannot be evaluated from available data. The Mineral Resource Zone Map within the 2035 La Quinta General Plan, also classifies the project property to be located within zones MRZ-1 and MRZ-3. A small portion of MRZ-3, located just north of Avenue 60 and west of Madison (i.e. the project site), is undeveloped vacant land designated for low density residential development. A barrow pit, used temporarily for the development of the Thomas Levy water recharge facility, is located within the project area. However, the use was temporary, and the barrow pit is not currently used for mining. The site has been designated for low density residential and golf course uses, and any barrow pits have been abandoned. The La Quinta General Plan Environmental Impact Report (LQGP EIR) states that undeveloped sites located in MRZ-3 zones in the City are surrounded by urban development and mineral extraction activities are incompatible and unlikely on the remaining vacant parcels. The project site, designated for urban uses, is not conducive to mineral extraction. Therefore, the LQGP EIR concludes that development of areas within these land use categories will not result in the loss of availability of locally important mineral resources considered valuable to the region and state and will not result in the loss of availability of mineral resource recovery sites. The project site is not recognized as a mineral resource recovery site delineated in the City of LQGP, General Plan EIR or resource maps prepared pursuant to SMARA. The use of a small portion of the property as a barrow pit was temporary and associated with the construction of the Thomas Levy water recharge facility to the northwest. The land is currently and has for many years been designated for residential and golf course development, and not for mineral extraction. Therefore, the proposed project will have no impact on mineral resources, and analysis of CEQA Thresholds "a" and "b" regarding mineral resources will not be included in the EIR. 4.2.12 Noise The project is located on vacant land on the southwest corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street. The closest airport to the project is the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport, located at 56-850 Higgins Drive in Thermal, California. The project is located approximately 4.25 miles west of the Airport. Since the project is not located within two miles of a public airport or in Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 38 Febraury 2021 362 the vicinity of a private airstrip, CEQA Threshold "c", regarding noise -related impacts, will not be analyzed in the EIR. The proposed project is consistent with the City's residential and residential and resort character. A project -specific noise impact analysis will be prepared. Potential impacts of noise associated with project construction and operation will be analyzed and addressed in the EIR, as required by CEQA Threshold "a". Appropriate design measures and all applicable restrictions and requirements will be identified within the EIR and, if necessary, mitigation measures will be identified and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. Additionally, project -generated groundborne vibration and groundborne noise levels will also be analyzed in the EIR to determine whether impacts are significant, and if necessary, mitigation measures will be identified and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels (CEQA Threshold "b"). 4.2.13 Population and Housing A maximum of 600 dwelling units are proposed to be developed within the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan. According to the 2020 California Department of Finance population and housing estimates, the City of La Quinta's total population is approximately 40,660 with an average household size of 2.60. The City of La Quinta's General Plan (LQGP) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) analyzed future growth in Section III, Part L, Populotion and Housing. The EIR forecasts a population of 46,297 people by year 2035. As a result of project build -out, the proposed development could add approximately 2,181 new residents to the City for an approximate population of 42,841. This is an increase of 5 percent, and still below the projected 2035 population forecast of 46,297. Although the project would contribute to growth within the City of La Quinta, significant growth to population, housing and employment is already anticipated in the City's General Plan and EIR, including based upon the prior entitlement approvals for the project site. In addition, this projected increase is a conservative figure because it assumes that the project's future residents will not be current residents of La Quinta. However, it is anticipated that some of the project's residents will be existing residents from within the City and/or from neighboring incorporated and unincorporated areas. Additionally, the 150 hotel keys will not lead to permanent residents of the project. The employment generated by the project will include hotel, commercial and surf -related employees. However, the project will not result in a large Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 39 Febraury 2021 363 employment base, and jobs created at the project will be absorbed by new and existing residents of the City and surrounding jurisdictions. The proposed project lies adjacent to the existing paved roadways, Avenue 58 (north) and Madison Street (east). Extensions of these roadways are not proposed as part of project implementation. Avenue 60, south of the proposed project, provides approximately 750 feet of paved access (from the Madison Street intersection) to the residential properties south of the site. Implementation of the proposed project will extend Avenue 60 approximately 525 feet to the west, to provide access to the southern portion of the project property. The project will be required to make offsite improvements for electrical power to the site. The project will be required to install an off -site transformer bank at an existing IID substation located at 81600 Avenue 58 and extend a distribution line along Avenue 58. Conduit systems will also be installed along Avenue 58 as part of the proposed upgrades. Construction of the conduits and line extension would occur in the existing right-of-way. The extension of IID's infrastructure will provide electricity exclusivity to the proposed project. The project's connection to the existing IID infrastructure will occur during the first phase of development and will be for exclusive use of the proposed project. In a letter dated May 26, 2020, IID concluded that electrical facilities can be extended to serve the project, under the conditions in the will serve letter. Water lines currently occur along Avenue 58 and Madison Street, and sanitary sewer lines occur on Avenue 58 and Avenue 60. No additional extensions of infrastructure will be required. The project is not anticipated to result in an indirect growth inducing impact because the existing infrastructure has been sized to accommodate long term growth by the applicable providers and because the projected population growth is already included in the City of La Quinta's General Plan. Therefore, the EIR will not analyze project -related direct and indirect population growth (CEQA Threshold "a") of the population and housing section. The project site is currently vacant and does not provide housing. Development of the project site would not displace substantial numbers of existing housing or people necessitating the construction of replacement housing and there would be no impact. Therefore, CEQA Threshold "b", regarding project -related impacts to population and housing, will not be analyzed in the EIR. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 40 Febraury 2021 364 4.2.14 Public Services The Riverside County Fire Department (RCFD), under contract with the City of La Quinta, provides 24-hour fire protection and emergency medical services to the City. Law enforcement services are provided to the City of La Quinta through a contractual agreement with the Riverside County Sheriff's Department. The Sheriff's department provides 24-hour municipal police services associated with a City police department. The City of La Quinta is served by two school districts: Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) and Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD). DSUSD serves the portion of the City west of Jefferson Street and north of Avenue 48, which includes the northern Sphere of Influence. CVUSD boundaries include the areas of Jefferson Street and east of Avenue 48. Implementation of the proposed project will increase the permanent population which could have an impact on the City's public services. CEQA Threshold "a" (fire protection; police protection; schools; parks; and other public facilities) will be analyzed in EIR to quantify the potential impacts of the demand to public services, and mitigation measures will be developed, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.15 Recreation The project proposes a mixed -use development consisting of commercial, tourist commercial, low density residential, and open space recreational uses on approximately 386 acres of vacant land. The project proposes the development of a golf practice facilities (i.e., par 3 golf, or putting green), clubhouse and resort amenities, supporting uses and the Wave basin. Additional recreational uses include: • The Wave contains an artificial surf wave basin (The Wave basin), that will recreate ocean waves for recreational surfing by individual resort residents and hotel guests as well as the hosting of limited private and public events by reservation. • The Wave Club will function as a private clubhouse with amenities for exclusive use by project residents and guests. The clubhouse may feature changing rooms, surfboard storage, pool, and a casual dining/lounging area. • The Farm will include private resort -serving entertainment and fitness facilities. It will offer a wide range of community and active lifestyle amenities , including hiking, biking, bicycle pump track, fitness, and swimming pool areas. In addition, spa and dining facilities may be provided for residents and hotel guests. • Planning Area IV, located on approximately 24 acres on the western side of the project property, allows open space, and low -impact active and passive recreational activities, such as hiking, biking, and ropes courses. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 41 Febraury 2021 365 The recreational amenities, parks, and open space areas proposed for the project would reduce use of City parks and recreation facilities, since the proposed site would provide various recreational opportunities within the project boundaries. Some visitors may attend events and participate in activities at local parks; however, such visits are expected to be minimal. The project will comply with the City's parkland in lieu fee (Quimby) and other development impact fees. The amount of recreational space provided within the project will reduce the likelihood of project residents' use of existing City facilities. Since the project will comply with Quimby fees, and the project proposes on -site recreational facilities, the project will not result in significant impacts to recreation, and the EIR will not analyze CEQAThresholds "a" and "b" regrading recreation. 4.2.16 Transportation The proposed project is located on vacant property at the southwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58 in the City of La Quinta. Vehicular access to the project is provided by existing public arterial roads, including Avenue 58 and Madison Street. The project will be required to widen and improve these roadways to their ultimate General Plan half -width. The property is surrounded by Low Density Residential land uses and natural open space. Regional access to the site is provided by Interstate 10, Highway 111, Madison Street, Monroe Street and other major arterials. The project will generate trips associated with residential, commercial and resort development, which could impact the City's circulation system. In addition, the project includes special events at the wave basin facility which would result in increases in trip generation during short periods of time. A traffic impact analysis (TIA) is being prepared to assess potential traffic -related impacts relating to development of the project site. The TIA will be based upon an analysis of existing roadway conditions in the project vicinity, a variety of traffic count sources (including peak hour counts collected by the consulting traffic engineers), the General Plan Circulation Element, planned roadway improvements and other data and information. The TIA will provide documentation and analysis of existing traffic conditions, trips generated by the project, distribution of the project trips to roads outside the project, and projected future traffic conditions. A project -specific Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) Analysis is also being conducted (pursuant to Senate Bill 743, and the City's VMT Analysis Policy) to evaluate the impacts of VMTs generated by the project. The findings of the VMT Analysis will be provided in the EIR. Moreover, the EIR will analyze hazards associated with transportation/roadway features, as well as emergency access proposed for the site. The EIR will analyze CEQA Thresholds "a", "b", Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 42 Febraury 2021 366 "c", and "d" in order to determine project -related impacts to traffic, and mitigation measures will be developed, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.17 Utilities and Service Systems Water and wastewater services would be provided by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). Currently, domestic water service lines exist along Avenue 58 and Madison Street. The project will require two well sites to adequately serve the site. The well sites will be located within the project's existing footprint and will be analyzed in the EIR. No new wastewater treatment facilities are required as a result of the project's development. The City determined that the proposed project requires the preparation and approval of a Water Supply Assessment and Water Supply Verification, consistent with Water Code Section 10912. A Water Supply Assessment (WSA) and Water Supply Verification (WSV) were completed for the proposed project and adopted by the water provider, CVWD, in March 2020. The findings of the WSA/WSV will be included in the EIR. Electrical service to the project would be provided by the Imperial Irrigation District (IID). Connection to an offsite substation is required in order to provide electrical power to the project. CVWD will also provide wastewater services to the site. The offsite sewer alignment and improvements will come from the east in Avenue 60. Wastewater will go to CVWD's water reclamation plan number 4 (WRP-4) located at 63-002 Fillmore St., Thermal CA. As a standard requirement, the project site design will incorporate stormwater management by conveying site runoff into on -site retention basins with a combined capacity to handle the water quality management plan design capture volume and the controlling 100-year storm event volume. This will also be analyzed in the Hydrology and Water Quality Section of the EIR. Southern California Gas Company is the provider of natural gas. Telephone and internet communications will be provided by Frontier and Charter Communications. Burrtec will provide solid waste and recycling services. The project will be able to tie into the existing cable, gas and telecommunications lines located along Avenue 58 and Madison Street. The project will not require or result in the relocation or construction of new or expanded water, wastewater treatment, storm water drainage systems, natural gas, or telecommunication facilities. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 43 Febraury 2021 367 The development of the proposed Coral Mountain Resort project would increase the demand for utilities in the City. The service, location, timing and construction of on- and off -site improvements required for all utilities will be included in the EIR analysis. Project design features and mitigation measures during construction and operation would be identified in the Draft EIR. CEQA Thresholds "a" through "e", regarding project impacts to utilities and service systems, will be evaluated in the EIR, and mitigation measures will be developed, if necessary, and analyzed to determine whether impacts can feasibly be reduced to less than significant levels. 4.2.18 Wildfires The project site is currently characterized as vacant land with scattered vegetation of varying densities. Vegetation within the project area includes Desert Saltbush scrub, Tamarisk scrub, Mesquite Hummock, and Sonoran creosote. Residential land uses surround the property to the north and east. The property's western and southern boundaries abut vacant land and Coral Mountain. Scattered residential estate properties lie south of the project site. According to CAL Fire's Fire Hazard Severity Zones (FHSZ) in State Responsibility Areas (SRA) Map, the project site is not located in an SRA or located in an area classified as very high fire hazard severity zone. Per CAL Fire's map, the property is located in a (incorporated) Local Responsibility Area (LRA) that is designated "non -Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone". The project is not located in or near state responsibility areas or lands classified as very high, high or moderate fire hazard severity zones, therefore, no impacts are anticipated. The FHSZ map designates the area west of the project site, i.e., Coral Mountain, as a Federal Responsibility Area (FRA). However, this site is also not designated as a very high, high or moderate FHSZ. Wildfire risk is related to a number of parameters, including fuel loading (vegetation), fire weather (winds, temperatures, humidity levels and fuel moisture contents) and topography (degree of slope). Steep slopes contribute to fire hazards by intensifying the effects of wind and make fire suppression difficult. Fuels such as grass are highly flammable because they have a high surface area to mass ratio and require less heat to reach the ignition point. According to the Riverside County General Plan, wildfire susceptibility is moderate to low in the valley and desert regions on the western and eastern sides of the Salton Sea. The project is not located in or near a State Responsibility Area, or an area classified as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone. Therefore, the project site is not expected to expose project occupants to pollutant concentrations from a wildfire or the uncontrolled spread of a wildfire. In addition to this, the La Quinta General Plan (LQGP) Environmental Impact Report (EIR) states that fire hazards exist where wildland areas are adjacent to or are intermixed with urbanized areas. The open space and wilderness areas on the western portion of the City are made up Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 44 Febraury 2021 368 primarily of Granitic rock and sparse desert vegetation. Therefore, there is limited vegetation to burn that could cause a major wildfire. The flat urbanized areas of La Quinta are considered very low wildfire areas. The project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires because the City of La Quinta does not provide conditions, such as dense vegetation, conducive for the spread of wildfires. The project would not impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan because it will provide emergency fire access to the project site, and will not alter the City's existing street system. Emergency access would be compliant with the standards of the Fire Department to ensure proper vehicular access for emergency vehicles to the site. As a result, the project is not expected to require the installation or maintenance of associated infrastructure that may exacerbate fire risk or that may result in temporary or ongoing impacts to the environment. Wildfires are not expected to occur at the project site, or within the City of La Quinta. This is due to the Granitic Rock and sparse vegetation that characterize the Santa Rosa Mountains, as well as the developed and landscaped urban areas of La Quinta. Since the City is not expected to be impacted by wildfires, the project would not expose people or structures to significant risks, including downslope or downstream flooding or landslides, as a result of runoff, post -fire slope instability, or drainage changes as a result of a wildfire. No impact is expected to result from the project, and CEQA Thresholds "a" through "d" regarding wildfire impacts are not analyzed in the EIR. 5.0 Conclusion An EIR will be prepared for the proposed project that addresses the environmental impacts associated with the development of the Coral Mountain Resort project. The EIR will also analyze a reasonable range of alternatives to the Project, including the CEQA-mandated "No Project Alternative", and other potential alternatives that may be capable of avoiding or substantially reducing any of the significant effects of the Project. All environmental issues identified in the CEQA Guidelines Appendix G, and other issues that may be raised by responsible or trustee agencies or other parties commenting on this Notice of Preparation will also be fully addressed in the EIR. Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP 45 Febraury 2021 369 Monday, March 8, 2021 at 17:13:01 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort - ALUC Comments Date: Monday, March 8, 2021 at 4:37:56 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Zerda, Daniel To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Hi Nicole, Thank you for providing your transmittal for the above referenced case. The project boundary is located outside of the Jacqueline Cochran Regional Airport influence area. At this time, the ALUC has no comments. Please let me know if you have any questions. -Best Regards, Daniel Zerda Student Intern Transportation and Land Management Agency County of Riverside (951)955-4678 Confidentiality Disclaimer This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the author's intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete all copies, both electronic and printed, and contact the author immediately. County of Riverside California 37(Page 1 of 1 Thursday, February 18, 2021 at 13:26:01 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort transmittal ALUC comments Date: Thursday, February 18, 2021 at 8:28:11 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Rull, Paul To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Attachments: image001.jpg Good Morning, Thank you for transmitting the above project to ALUC for review. Please note that the project is not located within an airport influence area, and therefore ALUC has no comments at this time. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Paul Rull ALUC Principal Planner Q)Riverside County Airport Land Use Commission 4080 Lemon Street. 1416 Floor Rrverside. Ca 92501 (951) 955-6893 (951) 955-5177 (fax) PRULLARIWO.ORG www,rcaiuc.orU Confidentiality Disclaimer This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. The information contained in this message may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. If you are not the author's intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete all copies, both electronic and printed, and contact the author immediately. County of Riverside California 37,Page 1 of 1 Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 11:00:04 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Project-SP 03-067 Date: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 4:36:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Troy Strange To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Kevin Kalman Attachments: image001.png, image002.png, image003.png, EmailSignaturelcon_143a3c2f-469e-49f0-8645- 450ffbd1815c.png, Face Booklcon_55d73386-ce1d-4cce-9b42-6df9953bbd53.png, Twitterlcon_cbc44c1e-5487-448c-9956-f3b3da4d307a.png, Inkedlnked79301 Trail Exp with inset 11X17 (003)_Ll.jpg Good Afternoon Nicole, I hope all is well. I am contacting you regarding the Coral Mountain Resort Project. The Desert Recreation District has trails that run adjacent to and on the property of the proposed Project (see attachment- trail in question is highlighted in red). We want to ensure that this trail remains and is not negatively impacted by the project. I would like to discuss detail when have time. Let me know the best day and time for you. Best regards, v *go*; 9AW TROY STRANGE Director of Planning & Public Works Desert Recreation District Phone: (760) 347-3484 Mobile: (760) 285-0547 Fax: (760) 347-4660 E-mail: tstrange@drd.us.com Web: www.myrecreationdistrict.com Best regards, 37Tage 1 of 2 TROY STRANGE Director of Planning & Public Works Desert Recreation District Phone: (760) 347-3484 Mobile: (760) 285-0547 Fax: (760) 347-4660 E-mail: tstrange@drd.us.com Web: www.myrecreationdistrict.com �e 3730age 2 of 2 ��IWIli1. KtPon I { - _ -VLfN lutt% na•.cO+IR[['17tN1 __ rTi • - I ;. ?/YAt r., u .%C.Mr • w I�I L- :-._...J NA IIIRN:1i t. T11YA }i1RL-f - VL'LTI-A k/f1.V TRAIL lltt]IN..% IKVL MOM *M OrY %rM.. RN Nttis CCCAI L(XY%NtC11{Tt - hl7R♦%Mrlf fpa• y R IM 40 410 CORAL MOUNTAIN INTERPRETIVE CENTER CORAL MOUNTAIN CITY OF LA QUiNTA 374 IID A ce'idiliw ( f sallice. March 18, 2021 Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner Design and Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 www,iid.com N111ce 1911 SUBJECT: NOP of an EIR for the Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map in La Quinta, CA Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste: On February 23, 2021, the Imperial Irrigation District received from the City of La Quinta, a Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Coral Mountain Specific Plan and Tentative Tract Map. The applicant, CM Wave Development, LLC; proposes the development of approximately 386 acres located south of Avenue 58, north of Avenue 60, and east and west of Madison Street in la Quinta, California to build 600 dwelling units, 150-room resort facility, 57,000 sq. ft. for tourist commercial uses, 60,000 sq. ft. of neighborhood commercial space, 23.6 acres for open space recreational uses and a 16.62-acre artificial wave basin for recreational purposes. The Imperial Irrigation District has reviewed the project information and has the following comments: 1. Based on the preliminary information provided to the IID for phase 1 and subsequent phases, the installation of a new distribution substation 1-40MVA 92/13.2kV transformer bank at the existing Avenue 58 Substation, including the reconfiguration of the 92kV transmission lines and all bank addition infrastructure, will be required to accommodate the power requirements of the project. 2. Applicant will be required to install a double conduit/vault system from the new Avenue 58 substation bank to the project for a minimum of six (6) distribution backbone feeders. The proposed route for this system is planned to come out of the Avenue 58 Substation, cross Avenue 58 and continue on the south side of Avenue 58 going west all the way to the project. The whole conduit system will be required to be in place prior to extending the new feeders/backbone line extensions (conduit, cable) from the Avenue 58 Substation's new 40MVA transformer circuit breakers to the project for phase 1 and subsequent phases. 375 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT • P.O. BOX 937 • IMPERIAL, CA 92251 Nicole Sauviat Criste March 18, 2021 Page 2 3. Applicant will be required to extend six (6) distribution backbone feeders as part of the new substation transformer implementation, including the associated backbone cable/terminations from Avenue 58 Substation's new 40MVA transformer circuit breakers to the project's load centers, all which are at the expense of the applicant. 4. The applicant shall bear the cost of the substation infrastructure to serve the project but would be reimbursed for any oversizing required, subject to approval by the IID Board of Directors. 5. Applicant (and other developers in the area) shall bear all costs associated with providing electrical service to the project, including but not limited to the construction of new substation facilities, transmission line extensions or upgrades, distribution backbone feeders, conduit/vault systems, distribution overhead and/or underground line extensions, the reconfiguration of distribution circuits, transmission line extensions or other upgrades as well as applicable permits, zoning changes, landscaping (if required by the City) and rights -of -way and easements. 6. Applicant should be advised that pursuant to IID process, the standard timeframe for the implementation of a new substation transformer (engineering, equipment procurement and construction) is 18 months at minimum. As a result, Applicant should adjust its project's in-service dates accordingly. The procurement of the new substation bank would start upon receipt of a customer project application for the substation bank acquisition including payment for the full cost of the required equipment. 7. Applicant is encouraged to submit a new Will Serve letter request with updated loading and construction phasing schedule to prepare a required full impact study for a revised Plan of Service. To avoid ambiguity and delays, this information will be required for all phases of the project. The information should be submitted well in advance of any required in-service date to ensure sufficient time for procurement and construction. 8. The district's ability to provide electrical service is based on currently available capacity as of this date, which may be impacted by future development in the area. It is important to note that a detailed and final study will be developed once a customer project application and loading calculations are received. This detailed information will allow IID to perform an accurate assessment and provide a full report of any potential impacts and mitigation measures. However, other projects could impact existing resources which may affect IID's ability to serve this load, if the buildout of the mitigation measures are not completed in a timely manner The conditions of service could change as a result of the additional studies. 376 Nicole Sauviat Criste March 18, 2021 Page 3 9. IID will not begin any studies, engineering or estimate costs to provide electrical service to the project until the applicant submits a customer project application (available at the website.http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=12923) and detailed loading information, panel sizes, project schedule and estimated in- service date, etc. are submitted as well. 10. Underground infrastructure that includes trenching, conduits, pull boxes, switch boxes and pads should be installed following IID approved plans. Physical field installation of underground infrastructures should be verified and approved by an IID inspector prior to cable installation as per IID Developer's Guide (available at the district website https://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=14229). 11. IID Regulations governing line extensions can be found at: No.2 (http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2540), No. 13 (littp://wwvv.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=255 ), No.15 (http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2555), No. 20 (http://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=2560) and No.23 (https://www.iid.com/home/showdocument?id=l7897). 12. For additional information regarding electrical service for the project, the applicant should be advised to contact the IID Energy - La Quinta Division Customer Operations, 81-600 Avenue 58 La Quinta, CA 92253, at (760) 398-5841 and speak with the project development planner assigned to the area. 13.It is important to note that IID's policy is to extend its electrical facilities only to those projects that have obtained the approval of a city or county planning commission and such other governmental authority or decision -making body having jurisdiction over said developments. 14. The applicant will be required to provide rights -of -way and easements for substation, transmission and distribution line extensions and overhead or underground infrastructure needed to serve the project. 15.Any construction or operation on IID property or within its existing and proposed right of way or easements including but not limited to: surface improvements such as proposed new streets, driveways, parking lots, landscape; and all water, sewer, storm water, or any other above ground or underground utilities; will require an encroachment permit, or encroachment agreement (depending on the circumstances). A copy of the IID encroachment permit application and instructions for its completion are available at https://www.iid.com/about-iid/department- directory/real-estate. The IID Real Estate Section should be contacted at (760) 339-9239 for additional information regarding encroachment permits or agreements. 377 Nicole Sauviat Criste March 18, 2021 Page 4 16. Relocation of existing IID facilities to accommodate the project and/or to accommodate street widening improvements imposed by the City will be deemed project -driven and all costs, as well as securing of rights of way and easements for relocated facilities, shall be borne by the applicant. 17. Public utility easements over all private public roads and additional ten (10) feet in width on both side of the private and public roads shall be dedicated to IID for the construction, operation, and maintenance of its electrical infrastructure. 18.Any new, relocated, modified or reconstructed IID facilities required for and by the project (which can include but is not limited to electrical utility substations, electrical transmission and distribution lines, etc.) need to be included as part of the project's CEQA and/or NEPA documentation, environmental impact analysis and mitigation. Failure to do so will result in postponement of any construction and/or modification of IID facilities until such time as the environmental documentation is amended and environmental impacts are fully mitigated. Any mitigation necessary as a result of the construction, relocation and/or upgrade of lID facilities is the responsibility of the project proponent. 19. Dividing a project into two or more pieces and evaluating each piece in a separate environmental document (Piecemealing or Segmenting), rather than evaluating the whole of the project in one environmental document, is explicitly forbidden by CEQA, because dividing a project into a number of pieces would allow a Lead Agency to minimize the apparent environmental impacts of a project by evaluating individual pieces separately, each of which may have a less -than -significant impact on the environment, but which together may result in a significant impact. Segmenting a project may also hinder developing comprehensive mitigation strategies. In general, if an activity or facility is necessary for the operation of a project, or necessary to achieve the project objectives, or a reasonably foreseeable consequence of approving the project, then it should be considered an integral project component that should be analyzed within the environmental analysis. The project description should include all project components, including those that will have to be approved by responsible agencies. The State CEQA Guidelines define a project under CEQA as "the whole of the action" that may result either directly or indirectly in physical changes to the environment. This broad definition is intended to provide the maximum protection of the environment. CEQA case law has established general principles on project segmentation for different project types. For a project requiring construction of offsite infrastructure, the offsite infrastructure must be included in the project description. San Joaquin Raptor/Wildlife Rescue Center v. County of Stanislaus (1994) 27 Cal.App. 4th 713. 20.Applicant should be advised that landscaping can be dangerous if items are planted too close to IID's electrical equipment. In the event of an outage, or equipment failure, it is vital that IID personnel have immediate and safe access to 378 Nicole Sauviat Criste March 18, 2021 Page 5 its equipment to make the needed repairs. For public safety, and that of the electrical workers, it is important to adhere to standards that limit landscaping around electrical facilities. IID landscaping guidelines are available at https://www.iid.com/energy/vegetation-management. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (760) 482-3609 or at dvargas@iid.com. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this matter. ZRespeIly, i Donald Vargas Compliance Administrator II Ennque B Martinez - General Manager Mike Pacheco - Manager, Water Dept. Marilyn Del Bosque Gilbert - Manager, Energy Dept, Constance Bergmark - Mgr. of Planning & Eng./Chief Elect, Engineer, Energy Dept, Ennque De Leon - Asst. Mgr., Energy Dept., Distr., Planning. Eng. & Customer Service Jamie Asbury - Assoc. General Counsel Vance Taylor - Asst. General Counsel Michael P. Kemp - Superintendent, Regulatory & Environmental Compliance Laura Cervantes - Supervisor, Real Estate 379 CHAIRPERSON Laura Miranda Luiseno VICE CHAIRPERSON Reginald Pagaling Chumash SECRETARY Merri Lopez -Keifer Luiseno PARLIAMENTARIAN Russell Attebery Karuk COMMISSIONER William Mungary Paiute/White Mountain Apache COMMISSIONER Julie Tumamait- Stenslie Chumash COMMISSIONER [Vacant] COMMISSIONER [Vacant] COMMISSIONER [Vacant] EXECUTIVE SECRETARY Christina Snider Porno NAHC HEADQUARTERS 1550 Harbor Boulevard Suite 100 West Sacramento, California 95691 (916) 373-3710 nahc@nahc.ca.aov NAHC.ca.gov NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION February 18, 2021 Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: 2021020310, Coral Mountain Resort Project, Riverside County Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste:. The Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) has received the Notice of Preparation (NOP), Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) or Early Consultation for the project referenced above. The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code §21000 et seq.), specifically Public Resources Code §21084.1, states that a project that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. (Pub. Resources Code § 21084.1; Cal. Code Regs., tit.14, § 15064.5 (b) (CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5 (b)). If there is substantial evidence, in light of the whole record before a lead agency, that a project may have a significant effect on the environment, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) shall be prepared. (Pub. Resources Code §21080 (d); Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 5064 subd.(a) (1) (CEQA Guidelines § 15064 (a) (1)). In order to determine whether a project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource, a lead agency will need to determine whether there are historical resources within the area of potential effect (APE). CEQA was amended significantly in 2014. Assembly Bill 52 (Gatto, Chapter 532, Statutes of 2014) (AB 52) amended CEQA to create a separate category of cultural resources, "tribal cultural resources" (Pub. Resources Code §21074) and provides that a project with an effect that may cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource is a project that may have a significant effect on the environment. (Pub. Resources Code §21084.2). Public agencies shall, when feasible, avoid damaging effects to any tribal cultural resource. (Pub. Resources Code §21084.3 (a)). AB 52 applies to any project for which a notice of preparation, a notice of negative declaration, or a mitigated negative declaration is filed on or after July 1, 2015. If your project involves the adoption of or amendment to a general plan or a specific plan, or the designation or proposed designation of open space, on or after March 1, 2005, it may also be subject to Senate Bill 18 (Burton, Chapter 905, Statutes of 2004) (SB 18). Both SB 18 and AB 52 have tribal consultation requirements. If your project is also subject to the federal National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. § 4321 et seq.) (NEPA), the tribal consultation requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (154 U.S.C. 300101, 36 C.F.R. §800 et seq.) may also apply, The NAHC recommends consultation with California Native American tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of your proposed project as early as possible in. order to avoid inadvertent discoveries of Native American human remains and best protect tribal cultural resources. Below is a brief summary of orp Lions of AB 52 and SB 18 as well as the NAHC's recommendations for conducting cultural resources assessments. Consult your legal counsel about compliance with AB 52 and SB 18 as well as compliance with any other applicable laws. Page 1 of 5 :E AB 52 AB 52 has added to CEQA the additional requirements listed below, along with many other requirements: 1. Fourteen Day Period to Provide Notice of Completion of an Application/Decision to Undertake a Project: Within fourteen (14) days of determining that an application for a project is complete or of a decision by a public agency to undertake a project, a lead agency shall provide formdl notification to a designated contact of, or tribal representative of, traditionally and culturally affiliated California Native American tribes that have requested notice, to be accomplished by at least one written notice that includes: a. A brief description of the project. b. The lead agency contact information. c. Notification that the California Native American tribe has 30 days to request consultation. (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.1 (d)). d. A "California Native American tribe" is defined as a Native American tribe located in California that is on the contact list maintained by the NAHC for the purposes of Chapter 905 of Statutes of 2004 (SB 18). (Pub. Resources Code §21073). 2. Begin Consultation Within 30 Days of Receiving a Tribe's Request for Consultation and Before Releasing a Neaative Declaration, Mitigated Negative Declaration, or Environmental Impact Report: A lead agency shall begin the consultation process within 30 days of receiving a request for consultation from a California Native American tribe that is traditionally and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the proposed project. (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3,1, subds. (d) and (e)) and prior to the release of a negative declaration, mitigated negative declaration or Environmental Impact Report. (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.1 (b)). a. For purposes of AB 52, "consultation shall have the same meaning as provided in Gov. Code §65352.4 (SB 18). (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.1 (b)). 3. Mandatory Topics of Consultation If Requested by a Tribe: The following topics of consultation, if a tribe requests to discuss them, are mandatory topics of consultation: a. Alternatives to the project. b. Recommended mitigation measures. c. Significant effects. (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.2 (a)). 4. Discretionary Topics of Consultation: The following topics are discretionary topics of consultation: a. Type of environmental review necessary. b. Significance of the tribal cultural resources. c. Significance of the project's impacts on tribal cultural resources. d. If necessary, project alternatives or appropriate measures for preservation or mitigation that the tribe may recommend to the lead agency. (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.2 (a)). 5. Confidentiality of Information Submitted by a Tribe During the Environmental Review Process: With some exceptions, any information, including but not limited to, the location, description, and use of tribal cultural resources submitted by a California Native American tribe during the environmental review process shall not be included in the environmental document or otherwise disclosed by the lead agency or any other public agency to the public, consistent with Government Code §6254 (r) and §6254.10. Any information submitted by a California Native American tribe during the consultation or environmental review process shall be published in a confidential appendix to the environmental document unless the tribe that provided the information consents, in writing, to the disclosure of some or all of the information to the public. (Pub. Resources Code §21082.3 (c) (1)). 6. Discussion of Impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources in the Environmental Document: If a project may have a significant impact on a tribal cultural resource, the lead agency's environmental document shall discuss both of the following: a. Whether the proposed project has a significant impact on an identified tribal cultural resource. b. Whether feasible alternatives or mitigation measures, including those measures that may be agreed to pursuant to Public Resources Code §21082.3, subdivision (a), avoid or substantially lessen the impact on the identified tribal cultural resource. (Pub. Resources Code §21082.3 (b)). Page 2 of 5 381 7. Conclusion of Consultation: Consultation with a tribe shall be considered concluded when either of the following occurs: a. The parties agree to measures to mitigate or avoid a significant effect, if a significant effect exists, on a tribal cultural resource; or b. A party, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached. (Pub. Resources Code §21080.3.2 (b)). 8. Recommending Mitigation Measures Agreed Upon in Consultation in the Environmental Document: Any mitigation measures agreed upon in the consultation conducted pursuant to. Public Resources Code §21080.3.2 shall be recommended for inclusion in the environmental document and in an adopted mitigation monitoring and reporting program, if determined to avoid or lessen the impact pursuant to Public Resources Code §21082.3, subdivision (b), paragraph 2, and shall be fully enforceable. (Pub. Resources Code §21082.3 (a)). 9. Required Consideration of Feasible Mitigation: If mitigation measures recommended by the staff of the lead agency as a result of the consultation process are not included in the environmental document or if there are no agreed upon mitigation measures at the conclusion of consultation, or if consultation does not occur, and if substantial evidence demonstrates that a project will cause a significant effect to a tribal cultural resource, the lead agency shall consider feasible mitigation pursuant to Public Resources Code §21084.3 (b). (Pub. Resources Code §21082.3 (e)). 10. Examples of Mitigation Measures That, If Feasible, May Be Considered to Avoid or Minimize Significant Adverse Impacts to Tribal Cultural Resources: a. Avoidance and preservation of the resources in place, including, but not limited to: i. Planning and construction to avoid the resources and protect the cultural and natural context. III. Planning greenspace, parks, or other open space, to incorporate the resources with culturally appropriate protection and management criteria. b. Treating the resource with culturally appropriate dignity, taking into account the tribal cultural values and meaning of the resource, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Protecting the cultural character and integrity of the resource. ii. Protecting the traditional use of the resource. iii. Protecting the confidentiality of the resource. c. Permanent conservation easements or other interests in real property, with culturally appropriate management criteria for the purposes of preserving or utilizing the resources or places. d. Protecting the resource. (Pub. Resource Code §21084,3 (b)). e. Please note that a federally recognized California Native American tribe or a non -federally recognized California Native American tribe that is on the contact list maintained by the NAHC to protect a California prehistoric, archaeological, cultural, spiritual, or ceremonial place may acquire and hold conservation easements if the conservation easement is voluntarily conveyed. (Civ. Code §815.3 (c)). f. Please note that it is the policy of the state that Native American remains and associated grave artifacts shall be repatriated. (Pub. Resources Code §5097.991). 11. Prerequisites for Certifying an Environmental Impact Report or Adopting a Mitigated Negative Declaration or Negative Declaration with a Significant Impact on an Identified Tribal Cultural Resource: An Environmental Impact Report may not be certified, nor may a mitigated negative declaration or a negative declaration be adopted unless one of the following occurs: a. The consultation process between the tribes and the lead agency has occurred as provided in Public Resources Code §21080.3.1 and §21080.3.2 and concluded pursuant to Public Resources Code §21080.3.2. b. The tribe that requested consultation failed to provide comments to the lead agency or otherwise failed to engage in the consultation process. c. The lead agency provided notice of the project to the tribe in compliance with Public Resources Code §21080.3.1 (d) and the tribe failed to request consultation within 30 days. (Pub. Resources Code §21082.3 (d)). The NAHC's PowerPoint presentation titled, "Tribal Consultation Under AB 52: Requirements and Best Practices" may be found online at: http:/Inahc.co. oq v/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/AB52TribalConsultation CaIEPAPDF.pdf Page 3 of 5 382 MW SB 18 applies to local governments and requires local governments to contact, provide notice to, refer plans to, and consult with tribes prior to the adoption or amendment of a general plan or a specific plan, or the designation of open space. (Gov. Code §65352.3). Local governments should consult the Governor's Office of Planning and Research's "Tribal Consultation Guidelines," which can be found online at: https://www.opr.ca.gov/docs/09 14 05 Updated Guidelines 922.1odf. Some of SB 18's provisions include: 1. Tribal Consultation: If a local government considers a proposal to adopt or amend a general plan or a specific plan, or to designate open space it is required to contact the appropriate tribes identified by the NAHC by requesting a "Tribal Consultation List." If a tribe, once contacted, requests consultation the local government must consult with the tribe on the plan proposal. A tribe has 90 days from the date of receipt of notification to request consultation unless a shorter timeframe has been agreed to by the tribe, (Gov, Code §65352.3 (a)(2))• 2. No Statutory Time Limit on SB 18 Tribal Consultation. There is no statutory time limit on SB 18 tribal consultation. 3. Confidentiality: Consistent with the guidelines developed and adopted by the Office of Planning and Research pursuant to Gov. Code §65040.2, the city or county shall protect the confidentiality of the information concerning the specific identity, location, character, and use of places, features and objects described in Public Resources Code §5097.9 and §5097.993 that are within the city's or county's jurisdiction. (Gov. Code §65352.3 (b))• 4. Conclusion of SB 18 Tribal Consultation: Consultation should be concluded at the point in which: a. The parties to the consultation come to a mutual agreement concerning the appropriate measures for preservation or mitigation; or b.. Either the local government or the tribe, acting in good faith and after reasonable effort, concludes that mutual agreement cannot be reached concerning the appropriate measures of preservation or mitigation. (Tribal Consultation Guidelines, Governor's Office of Planning and Research (2005) at p: 18). Agencies should be aware that neither AB 52 nor SB 18 precludes agencies from initiating tribal consultation with tribes that are traditionally and culturally affiliated with fheir jurisdictions before the timeframes provided in AB 52 and SB *18. For that reason, we urge you to continue to request Native American Tribal Contact Lists and "Sacred Lands File" searches from the NAHC. The request forms can be found online at: http:/Inahc.ca.gov/resources/forms/. NAHC Recommendations for Cultural Resources Assessments To adequately assess the existence and significance of tribal cultural resources and plan for avoidance, preservation in place, or barring both, mitigation of project -related impacts to tribal cultural resources, the NAHC recommends the following actions: 1. Contact the appropriate regional California Historical Research Information System (CHRIS) Center (http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page id=1068) for an archaeological records search. The records search will determine: a. If part or all of the APE has been previously surveyed for cultural resources. b. If any known cultural resources have already been recorded on or adjacent to the APE. c. If the probability is low, moderate, or high that cultural resources are located in the APE. d. If a survey is required to determine whether previously unrecorded cultural resources are present. 2. If an archaeological inventory survey is required, the final stage is the preparation of a professional report detailing the findings and recommendations of the records search and field survey. a. The final report containing site forms, site significance, and mitigation measures should be submitted immediately to the planning department. All information regarding site locations, Native American human remains, and associated funerary objects should be in a separate confidential addendum and not be made available for public disclosure. b. The final written report should be submitted within 3 months after work has been completed to the appropriate regional CHRIS center. Page 4 of 5 383 3. Contact the NAHC for: a. A Sacred Lands File search. Remember that tribes do not always record their sacred sites in.the Sacred Lands File, nor are they required to do so. A Sacred Lands File search is not a substitute for consultation with tribes that are traditionally. and culturally affiliated with the geographic area of the project's APE. b. A Native American Tribal Consultation List of appropriate tribes for consultation concerning the project site and to assist in planning for avoidance, preservation in place, or, failing both, mitigation measures. 4. Remember that the lack of surface evidence of archaeological resources (including tribal cultural resources) does not preclude their subsurface existence. a. Lead agencies should include in their mitigation and monitoring reporting program plan provisions for the identification and evaluation of inadvertently discovered archaeological resources per Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15064.5(f) (CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5(f)). In areas of identified archaeological sensitivity, a certified archaeologist and a culturally affiliated Native American with knowledge of cultural resources should monitor all ground -disturbing activities. b. Lead agencies should include in their mitigation and monitoring reporting program plans provisions for the disposition of recovered cultural items that are not burial associated in consultation with culturally affiliated Native Americans. c. Lead agencies should include in their mitigation and monitoring reporting program plans provisions for the treatment and disposition of inadvertently discovered Native American human remains. Health and Safety Code §7050.5, Public Resources Code §5097.98, and Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15064.5, subdivisions (d) and (e) (CEQA Guidelines § 15064.5, subds. (d) and (e)) address the processes to be followed in the event of an inadvertent discovery of any Native American human remains and associated grave goods in a location other than a dedicated cemetery. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at my email address: Andrew.Green@nahc.ca.aov. Sincerely, Andrew Green Cultural Resources Analyst cc: State Clearinghouse Page 5 of 5 JASON E. UHLEY General Manager -Chief Engineer RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle 'Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: Nicole Sauviat Criste March 9, 2021 Re: Coral Mountain Resort 1995 MARKET STREET RIVERSIDE, CA 92501 951.955.1200 FAX 951,788.9965 www.rcflood.org D71,19 The Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (District) does not normally recommend conditions for land divisions or other land use cases in incorporated cities. The District also does not plan check City land use cases or provide State Division of Real Estate letters or other flood hazard reports for such cases. District comments/recommendations for such cases are normally limited to items of specific interest to the District including District Master Drainage Plan facilities, other regional flood control and drainage facilities which could be considered a logical component or extension of a master plan system, and District Area Drainage Plan fees (development mitigation fees). In addition, information of a general nature is provided. The District's review is based on the above -referenced project transmittal, received February 18, 2021. The District has not reviewed the proposed project in detail. and the following comments do not in any way constitute or imply District approval or endorsement of the proposed project with respect to flood hazard, public health and safety, or any other such issue: ® This project would not be impacted by District Master Drainage Plan facilities, nor are other facilities of regional interest proposed. ❑ This project involves District proposed Master Drainage Plan facilities, namely, . The District will accept ownership of such facilities on written request of the City. Facilities must be constructed to District standards, and District plan check and inspection will be required for District acceptance. Plan check, inspection, and administrative fees will be required. ❑ An encroachment permit shall be obtained for any construction related activities occurring within District right of way or facilities, namely, . For further information, contact the District's Encroachment Permit section at 951.955.1266. ❑ The Districts previous comments are still valid. 385 City of La Quinta - 2 - March 9, 2021 Re: Coral Mountain Resort 237149 GENERAL INFORMATION This project may require a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit from the State Water Resources Control Board. Clearance for grading, recordation, or other final approval should not be given until the City has determined that the project has been granted a permit or is shown to be exempt. If this project involves a Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapped floodplain, then the City should require the applicant to provide all studies, calculations, plans, and other information required to meet FEMA requirements, and should further require that the applicant obtain a Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) prior to grading, recordation, or other final approval of the project and a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) prior to occupancy. If a natural watercourse or mapped floodplain is impacted by this protect, the City should require the applicant to obtain a Section 1602 Agreement from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife and a Clean Water Act Section 404 Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, or written correspondence from these agencies indicating the project is exempt from these requirements. A Clean Water Act Section 401 Water Quality Certification may be required from the local California Regional Water Quality Control Board prior to issuance of the Corps 404 permit. Very truly yours, o R- DEBORAH DE 'HAMBEAU Engineering Project Manager ec: Riverside County Planning Department Attn: Phayvanh Nanthavongdouangsy SLJ:bIm I,® AMP April 1, 2021 s Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner City of La Quinta SC'G. 78-495 Calle Tampico INNOVATING FOR A BETTER TOMORROW La Quinta, California 92253 Phone: (760) 777-7062 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA E-mail: consultingplanner(a)Iaguintaca.gov ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS goo Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 1700 RE: SCAG Comments on the Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Los Angeles, CA 90017 Impact Report for the Coral Mountain Resort [SCAG NO. IGR10349] (213) 236-1800 www.scag.ca.gov Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste, Thank you for submitting the Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact REGIONAL COUNCIL OFFICERS Report for the Coral Mountain Resort ("proposed project") to the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for review and comment. SCAG is responsible President Rex Richardson, long Beach for providing informational resources to regionally significant plans, projects, and programs per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) to facilitate the First Vice President consistency of these projects with SCAG's adopted regional plans, to be determined Clint Lorimore, Eastvale by the lead agencies.' Second Vice President )an C. Harnik, Riverside County Pursuant to Senate Bill (SB) 375, SCAG is the designated Regional Transportation Transportation Commission Planning Agency under state law and is responsible for preparation of the Regional Immediate Past President Transportation Plan (RTP) including the Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS). Alan D. Wapner, San Bernardino SCAG's feedback is intended to assist local jurisdictions and project proponents to County Transportation Authority implement projects that have the potential to contribute to attainment of Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) goals and align COMMITTEE CHAIRS with RTP/SCS policies. Finally, SCAG is also the authorized regional agency for Inter -Governmental Review (IGR) of programs proposed for Federal financial Executive/Administration assistance and direct Federal development activities, pursuant to Presidential Rex Richardson, Long Beach Executive Order 12372. Community, Economic & Human Development SCAG staff has reviewed the Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Jorge Marquez, Covina Report for the Coral Mountain Resort in Riverside County. The proposed project is a Energy & Environment specific plan that includes 600 dwelling units, a resort facility of 150 rooms, 57,000 David Pollock, Moorpark square feet (SF) of tourist commercial uses, 60,000 SF of commercial use, a 16.62- Transportation acre wave basin for recreational use, and 23.6 acres of open space on 386 acres. Cheryl Viegas-Walker, El Centro When available, please email environmental documentation to IGR(a�scap.ca.pov providing, at a minimum, the full public comment period for review. If you have any questions regarding the attached comments, please contact the Inter - Governmental Review (IGR) Program, attn.: Karen Calderon, Associate Regional Planner, at (213) 236-1983 or IGR(a�scaq.ca.gov. Thank you. Sincerely, Ping Chang Manager, Compliance and Performance Monitoring Lead agencies such as local jurisdictions have the sole discretion in determining a local project's consistency with the 2020 RTP/SCS (Connect SoCal) for the purpose of determining consistency for CEQA. 387 March 19, 2021 Ms. Sauviat Criste COMMENTS ON THE NOTICE OF PREPARATION OF A DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT FOR THE CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT [SCAG NO. IGR10349] CONSISTENCY WITH CONNECT SOCAL SCAG No. IGR10349 Page 2 SCAG provides informational resources to facilitate the consistency of the proposed project with the adopted 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS or Connect SoCal). For the purpose of determining consistency with CEQA, lead agencies such as local jurisdictions have the sole discretion in determining a local project's consistency with Connect SoCal. CONNECT SOCAL GOALS The SCAG Regional Council fully adopted Connect SoCal in September 2020. Connect SoCal, also known as the 2020 — 2045 RTP/SCS, builds upon and expands land use and transportation strategies established over several planning cycles to increase mobility options and achieve a more sustainable growth pattern. The long-range visioning plan balances future mobility and housing needs with goals for the environment, the regional economy, social equity and environmental justice, and public health (see https://scag.ca.gov/read- plan-adopted-final-plan). The goals included in Connect SoCal may be pertinent to the proposed project. These goals are meant to provide guidance for considering the proposed project. Among the relevant goals of Connect SoCal are the following: SCAG CONNECT SOCAL GOALS Goal #1: Encourage regional economic prosperity and global competitiveness Goal #2: Improve mobility, accessibility, reliability and travel safety for people and goods Goal #3: Enhance the preservation, security, and resilience of the regional transportation system Goal #4: Increase person and goods movement and travel choices within the transportation system Goal #5: Reduce greenhouse gas emissions and improve air quality Goal #6: Support healthy and equitable communities Goal #7: Adapt to a changing climate and support an integrated regional development pattern and transportation network Goal #8: Leverage new transportation technologies and data -driven solutions that result in more efficient travel Goal #9: Encourage development of diverse housing types in areas that are supported by multiple transportation options Goal #10: Promote conservation of natural and agricultural lands and restoration of habitats For ease of review, we encourage the use of a side -by -side comparison of SCAG goals with discussions of the consistency, non -consistency or non -applicability of the goals and supportive analysis in a table format. Suggested format is as follows: Page 12 of 4 388 March 19, 2021 Ms. Sauviat Criste SCAG No. IGR10349 Page 3 SCAG CONNECT SOCAL GOALS Goal Analysis Goal #1: Encourage regional economic prosperity and global Consistent: Statement as to why; competitiveness Not -Consistent: Statement as to why; Or Not Applicable: Statement as to why; DEIR page number reference Goal #2: Improve mobility, accessibility, reliability and travel safety Consistent: Statement as to why; for people and goods Not -Consistent: Statement as to why; Or Not Applicable: Statement as to why; DEIR page number reference etc. etc. Connect SoCal Strategies To achieve the goals of Connect SoCal, a wide range of land use and transportation strategies are included in the accompanying twenty (20) technical reports. To view Connect SoCal and the accompanying technical reports, please visit: https://scag.ca.gov/read-plan-adopted-final-plan. Connect SoCal builds upon the progress from previous RTP/SCS cycles and continues to focus on integrated, coordinated, and balanced planning for land use and transportation that helps the SCAG region strive towards a more sustainable region, while meeting statutory requirements pertinent to RTP/SCSs. These strategies within the regional context are provided as guidance for lead agencies such as local jurisdictions when the proposed project is under consideration. DEMOGRAPHICS AND GROWTH FORECASTS A key, formative step in projecting future population, households, and employment through 2045 for Connect SoCal was the generation of a forecast of regional and county level growth in collaboration with expert demographers and economists on Southern California. From there, jurisdictional level forecasts were ground-truthed by subregions and local agencies, which helped SCAG identify opportunities and barriers to future development. This forecast helps the region understand, in a very general sense, where we are expected to grow, and allows SCAG to focus attention on areas that are experiencing change and may have increased transportation needs. After a year -long engagement effort with all 197 jurisdictions one-on-one, 82 percent of SCAG's 197 jurisdictions provided feedback on the forecast of future growth for Connect SoCal. SCAG also sought feedback on potential sustainable growth strategies from a broad range of stakeholder groups — including local jurisdictions, county transportation commissions, other partner agencies, industry groups, community -based organizations, and the general public. Connect SoCal utilizes a bottom -up approach in that total projected growth for each jurisdiction reflects feedback received from jurisdiction staff, including city managers, community development/planning directors, and local staff. Growth at the neighborhood level (i.e. transportation analysis zone (TAZ)) reflects entitled projects and adheres to current general and specific plan maximum densities as conveyed by jurisdictions (except in cases where entitled projects and development agreements exceed these capacities as calculated by SCAG). Neighborhood level growth projections also feature strategies that help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from automobiles and light trucks to achieve Southern California's GHG reduction target, approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) in accordance with state planning law. Connect SoCal's Forecasted Development Pattern is utilized for long range modeling purposes and does not supersede actions taken by elected bodies on future development, including entitlements and development agreements. SCAG does not have the authority to implement the plan -- neither through decisions about what type of development is built where, nor what transportation projects are ultimately built, as Connect SoCal is adopted at the jurisdictional level. Achieving a sustained regional outcome depends upon informed and intentional local action. To access jurisdictional level growth estimates and forecasts for years 2016 and 2045, please refer to the Connect SoCal Demographics and Growth Forecast Technical Report: Page 13 of 4 389 March 19, 2021 Ms. Sauviat Criste SCAG No. IGR10349 Page 4 https:Hscag.ca.gov/sites/main/files/file-attachments/0903fconnectsocal demographics-and-growth- forecast.pdf?1606001579. The growth forecasts for the region and applicable jurisdictions are below. Adopted SCAG Region Wide Forecasts Adopted City of La Quinta Forecasts Year 2020 Year 2030 Year 2035 Year 2045 Year 2020 Year 2030 Year 2035 Year 2045 Population 19,517,731 20,821,171 21,443,006 22,503,899 41,315 43,734 45,034 47,662 Households 6,333,458 6,902,821 7,170,110 7,633,451 16,008 17,332 18,035 19,392 Employment 8,695,427 9,303,627 9,566,384 10,048,822 17,172 17,955 18,215 18,697 MITIGATION MEASURES SCAG staff recommends that you review the Final Program Environmental Impact Report (Final PEIR) for Connect SoCal for guidance, as appropriate. SCAG's Regional Council certified the PEIR and adopted the associated Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations (FOF/SOC) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) on May 7, 2020 and also adopted a PEIR Addendum and amended the MMRP on September 3, 2020 (please see: https:Hscag.ca.gov/program-environmental- impact-report; and scroll to the bottom of the page for the PEIR Addendum). The PEIR includes a list of project -level performance standards -based mitigation measures that may be considered for adoption and implementation by lead, responsible, or trustee agencies in the region, as applicable and feasible. Project - level mitigation measures are within responsibility, authority, and/or jurisdiction of project -implementing agency or other public agency serving as lead agency under CEQA in subsequent project- and site- specific design, CEQA review, and decision -making processes, to meet the performance standards for each of the CEQA resource categories. Page 14 of 4 390 South Coast Air Quality Management District 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-41 78 (909) 396-2000 • �vww.agmd.gov SENT VIA E-MAIL: March 9, 2021 consultingp lanner(c-r�,laquintaca. gov Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner City of la Quinta, Planner Department 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Notice of Preparation of an Environmental Impact Report for the Coral Mountain Resort (Proposed Proiect) South Coast Air Quality Management District (South Coast AQMD) staff appreciates the opportunity to comment on the above -mentioned document. Our comments are recommendations on the analysis of potential air quality impacts from the Proposed Project that should be included in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR). Please send a copy of the EIR upon its completion and public release directly to South Coast AQMD as copies of the EIR submitted to the State Clearinghouse are not forwarded. In addition, please send all appendices and technical documents related to the air quality, health risk, and greenhouse gas analyses and electronic versions of all emission calculation spreadsheets, and air quality modeling and health risk assessment input and output files (not PDF files). Any delays in providing all supporting documentation for our review will require additional review time beyond the end of the comment period. CEOA Air Quality Analysis Staff recommends that the Lead Agency use South Coast AQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook and website' as guidance when preparing the air quality and greenhouse gas analyses. It is also recommended that the Lead Agency use the CalEEMod2 land use emissions software, which can estimate pollutant emissions from typical land use development and is the only software model maintained by the California Air Pollution Control Officers Association. South Coast AQMD has developed both regional and localized significance thresholds. South Coast AQMD staff recommends that the Lead Agency quantify criteria pollutant emissions and compare the emissions to South Coast AQMD's CEQA regional pollutant emissions significance thresholds' and localized significance thresholds (LSTs)4 to determine the Proposed Project's air quality impacts. The localized analysis can be conducted by either using the LST screening tables or performing dispersion modeling. The Lead Agency should identify any potential adverse air quality impacts that could occur from all phases of the Proposed Project and all air pollutant sources related to the Proposed Project. Air quality impacts from both construction (including demolition, if any) and operations should be calculated. Construction -related air quality impacts typically include, but are not limited to, emissions from the use of heavy-duty equipment from grading, earth-loading/unloading, paving, architectural coatings, off -road 1 South Coast AQMD's CEQA Handbook and other resources for preparing air quality analyses can be found at: bup://www. agmd. gov/home/rules-compliance/cega/air-quality-analysi s-handbook. z CalEEMod is available free of charge at: www.caleemod.com. s South Coast AQMD's CEQA regional pollutant emissions significance thresholds can be found at: blV://www. agmd. gov/docs/default-source/cega/handbook/scagmd-air-quality-si mificance-thresholds. pdf. ' South Coast AQMD's guidance for performing a localized air quality analysis can be found at: http://www.agmd. goy/home/regulations/ceqa/air-quality-analysis-handbook/localized-significance-thresholds. 391 Nicole Sauviat Criste 2 March 9, 2021 mobile sources (e.g., heavy-duty construction equipment) and on -road mobile sources (e.g., construction worker vehicle trips, material transport trips, and hauling trips). Operation -related air quality impacts may include, but are not limited to, emissions from stationary sources (e.g., boilers and air pollution control devices), area sources (e.g., solvents and coatings), and vehicular trips (e.g., on- and off -road tailpipe emissions and entrained dust). Air quality impacts from indirect sources, such as sources that generate or attract vehicular trips, should be included in the analysis. Furthermore, emissions from the overlapping construction and operational activities should be combined and compared to South Coast AQMD's regional air quality CEQA operational thresholds to determine the level of significance. If the Proposed Project generates diesel emissions from long-term construction or attracts diesel -fueled vehicular trips, especially heavy-duty diesel -fueled vehicles, it is recommended that the Lead Agency perform a mobile source health risk assessment'. In the event that implementation of the Proposed Project requires a permit from South Coast AQMD, South Coast AQMD should be identified as a Responsible Agency for the Proposed Project in the EIR. The assumptions in the air quality analysis in the EIR will be the basis for evaluating the permit under CEQA and imposing permit conditions and limits. Questions on permits should be directed to South Coast AQMD's Engineering and Permitting staff at (909) 396-3385. Mitigation Measures In the event that the Proposed Project results in significant adverse air quality impacts, CEQA requires that all feasible mitigation measures that go beyond what is required by law be utilized to minimize these impacts. Any impacts resulting from mitigation measures must also be analyzed. Several resources to assist the Lead Agency with identifying potential mitigation measures for the Proposed Project include South Coast AQMD's CEQA Air Quality Handbook', South Coast AQMD's Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan 6, and Southern California Association of Government's Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan for the 2020-2045 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy'. South Coast AQMD staff is available to work with the Lead Agency to ensure that air quality, greenhouse gas, and health risk impacts from the Proposed Project are accurately evaluated and mitigated where feasible. If you have any questions regarding this letter, please contact me at lsun&agmd. gov. Sincerely, ze' & Sam Lijin Sun, J.D. Program Supervisor, CEQA IGR Planning, Rule Development & Area Sources LS RVC210218-02 Control Number 5 South Coast AQMD's guidance for performing a mobile source health risk assessment can be found at: bIV://www. agmd. gov/home/regulations/cega/air-quality-analysis-handbook/mobile-source-toxics-analysis. 6 South Coast AQMD's 2016 Air Quality Management Plan can be found at: htip://www.agmd.eov/docs/default- source/Agendas/Governing-Board/2017/2017-mar3-035.pdf (starting on page 86). ' Southern California Association of Governments' 2020-2045 RTP/SCS can be found at: htips://www.connectsocal.org/Documents/PEIR/certified/Exhibit-A ConnectSoCal_PEIR.pdf. 392 Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 11:34:37 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: La Quinta Wave Park Date: Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 8:36:31 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Marcia Abrahamsen To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov As a resident living in Trilogy on 60th Avenue and Madison, I'm deeply concerned about plans for a wave park on Madison between 58th and 60th. You must be 55 years or older to live in our community and while there are several issues about the resort and wave park that are troubling, I'm deeply worried about the frequent loudspeaker noise and considerable traffic congestion on Madison. Also, with the huge increase in traffic because of the hotel, homes, arena and wave park, we would experience serious service delays from the fire house on Madison and 54th. Thank you, Marcia Abrahamsen Marcia Abrahamsen Choose Happy 81953 Daniel Dr., La Quinta, CA 92253 marciaccis@gmail.com Phone: 760-972-4325 39Tage 1 of 1 Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 13:34:31 Pacific Standard Time Subject: La Quinta Development project Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 1:22:42 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Mary Ackermann-Gaer/Broker Assoc. To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Well, first of all, I hope that I am never too old to be closed minded toward development that will benefit our area. I am a retired licensed general contractor and an active Real Estate investor/broker. I see the global picture rather than an inconvenience of having construction going on for a while. It's far enough away that the noise will not be a factor. There is a group at Trilogy La Quinta that is fighting to stop the Surf park resort. They want NO GROWTH. The new board of directors is caving to their demands to object to the Surf park. I live at Trilogy (original homeowner since 2004) and believe firmly that this new project will be of great benefit to everyone. First, it will benefit our golf course with new players and diners at a financially failing golf course location. As homeowners, we will benefit when the golf course is whole again. Second, realtors will not bring buyers out to our development because it is "too far out". I hear this over and over again. With the new development, i believe there will be many visitors to our community looking to purchase reasonably priced homes with low homeowner fees and many amenities. 55+ just doesn't seem old anymore. We are a very active community for the most part. Third, it will stop the blowing sand from saturating our development and possibly boost our growth to the point where someone would want to build a small shopping center? Grocery Store? I am BEGGING you to accept and approve this project. It is a WIN -WIN for the entire area. Mary Ackermann-Gaer Real Estate Associate Broker Ca.DRE#01147420 Windermere Homes & Estates Licensed General Contractor B484530 BSBA - Marketing (760) 8 15-22 14 - Cell IMPORTANT NOTICE: I WILL NEVER SEND YOU WIRE INSTRUCTIONS OR ASK YOU TO WIRE FUNDS. Never trust wiring instructions sent via email.Cyber criminals are hacking email accounts and sending emails with fake wiring instructions. These emails are convincing and sophisticated. Always independently confirm wiring instructions in person or via a telephone call to a trusted and verified phone number. Never wire money without double-checking that the wiring instructions are correct. 39413age 1 of 1 Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 07:56:09 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Site Location of the 18 Million Gallon KS Wave Pool Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 11:24:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Brian To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov For your review and consideration: The noise level of the Wave crashing has been measured at 75 decibels at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch. 75 decibels is comparable to the sound of cars traveling on a busy interstate highway. With the generators running non-stop. Additionally the multiple locations of the wave warning loud speaker system will be blaring every 5 to 6 minutes while in operation every day. This is excessive noise pollution in a residential area including a 55 and over development. Proposed location of the 18 million gallon wave reservoir is in close proximity to both Andalusia and Trilogy near the corners of Madison and Ave 60. There should be a review of the proposed location. The reservoir location would make more sense being relocated to the South Western area of the property closer to the Coral Mountains and away from the residents living in both of these developments. We need to preserve our current noise levels! Regards, Brian Ambrose 81280 Cambria CT La Quinta VII-111N-1.11 EAyAFr11" Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android 395Page 1 of 1 Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 15:07:42 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Opposition to Coral Mountain Surf Park Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 3:01:47 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Dick Antopol To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Dick Antopol The city of La Quinta should not approve a business that poses such a negative Impact on the lifestyles of current residents in the immediate area. Most homeowners in the quiet golf course neighborhoods of The Quarry, Andalusia, Trilogy and PGA West would never have purchased homes in the area knowing that this project was coming. The area is already impacted by noise, traffic and congestion during the April events of Coachella and Stage Coach. Thankfully those events happen only one month a year. This project proposes to allow a high occupancy hotel and year round events! It is a slap in the face to residents in the immediate area from 54th to 60th avenues along Madison. There are lots of other undeveloped areas in the desert that are not so close to established residential developments that would be suitable for this kind of project. Dick Antopol (909) 838-3111 Sent from my iPad 39EPage 1 of 1 Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 13:53:31 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Proposed Wave Park at Coral Mountain Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 1:36:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Pascal Apotheloz To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Apotheloz, Joanne (joanneapo8@gmail.com), Rob Michiels Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste, It has recently come to our attention that the referenced project is being reviewed by the city. We live in the adjacent Coral Mountain Estates development and our property will have a direct line of sight on the proposed wave park from our backyard. We would like to strongly object to this development based on the following elements (all of which are actually described in one way or another in your notice of preparation). Light pollution. This tract is in one of the last unspoiled areas of La Quinta where total darkness survives and observation of the beautiful desert night sky is uncompromised. This project proposes the installation of 80 ft high light poles to allow for nighttime commercial activity which will likely completely obliterate the night sky. Since the area where the poles are proposed is already about 20 feet higher in elevation, the emitted light will shine straight into our development. I have always been under the impression that all desert cities have specific and strict rules on light pollution? Traffic pollution. This tract was meant to be a fairly low density residential area (with full golf) and this proposal would create substantial additional traffic to/from a fledged commercial sports complex, hotel, multiple restaurants and higher density residential housing (up to 600 units?). The hotel, which was originally presented as two story maximum, is now planned as 4-story and will obstruct view of Coral Mountain from pretty much every residence with that view. Traffic on Madison will increase by many hundreds of vehicles. Noise pollution. The proposed wave equipment generates substantial noise that will travel far in the desert. The developers admit that the wave operation will involve loudspeaker announcement of every wave. Noise pollution should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.1. Seismic disturbance. The proposed wave equipment by its very nature generates vibration (not to mention the additional seismic disturbance generated by the resulting wave crashing) which will easily travel long distances in the loose desert soil. Pool and jacuzzi leaks for the neighboring properties will not be far behind. Seismic disturbance should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.1. Quality of life reduction. The hours of operation of this facility have been insufficiently clarified but there is a distinct impression the wave operation may be started as early as 6 in the morning and go well into the night? This should be considered unacceptable in a once peaceful residential area. Thank you for consideration of my comments. Sincerely, Pascal Apotheloz Pascal and Joanne Apotheloz 57599 Salida Del Sol La Quinta, CA 92253 Mailing address: 397Page 1 of 2 805 Quivera Street Laguna Beach, CA 92651 Cell + 1949 878-0804 Email papotheloz@dre-eng.com Pascal R. Apotheloz, P.L.S. I Principal DRC Engineering, Inc. ,d company t: 714.685.6860 x 335 1 c: 949.878.0804 1 papotheloz@dre-eng.com 160 South Old Springs Road Suite 210, Anaheim Hills, CA 92808 39EPage 2 of 2 Dear Ms Sauviat Criste, It has recently come to my attention that the referenced project is still being reviewed by the city. We live in the adjacent Andalusia housing development (original owner of the tract in question. We would like to strongly object to this development based on the following elements (all of which are actually described in one way or another in your notice of preparation). Light pollution. This tract is in one of the last unspoiled areas of La Quinta where total darkness survives and observation of the beautiful desert night sky is uncompromised. This project proposes the installation of 80 ft high light poles along the length of the wave course to allow for nighttime commercial activity which will likely completely obliterate the night sky in this entire area. Since the area where the poles will sit is already 20ft higher than our property, the emitted light will shine straight into our development. I have always been under the impression that all desert cities have specific and strict rules on light pollution? 2. Traffic pollution. This tract was meant to be a fairly low density residential area (with full golf) and this proposal would create substantial additional traffic to/from a commercial sports complex, hotel, multiple restaurants and higher density residential housing. 3. Noise pollution. The proposed wave equipment generates substantial noise that will travel far in the desert. Noise pollution should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12. 4. Seismic disturbance. The proposed wave equipment by its very nature generates vibration (not to mention the additional seismic disturbance generated by the resulting wave crashing) which will easily travel long distances in the loose desert soil. Seismic disturbance should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12. Indeed, given the short distance to our residence, seismic disturbance could long term lead to pool leaks and other structural damage to our property. 5. Quality of life reduction. The hours of operation of this facility have been insufficiently clarified but there is a distinct impression the wave operation may be started as early as 6 in the morning and go well into the night? This should be considered unacceptable in a once peaceful residential area where the only disturbance might be an errand golf ball. Thank you for your consideration of our comments. Sincerely, John & Marilyn Argent 81775 Andalusia La Quinta, CA 92253 399 Saturday, April 3, 2021 at 11:30:48 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: City of La Quinta Resident Comments re: Coral Mountain Resort Date: Friday, April 2, 2021 at 4:53:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: robert arroyo To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Cheri Flores, Kimberly Cuza Dear Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta: Thank you for allowing us to submit our thoughts and comments for the planning process of the proposed Coral Mountain Resort located on 929 acres bounded by Avenue 58, Avenue 60 and Madison in La Quinta. Please also note that we do not object to development in La Quinta, but development must be thoughtful, well -planned and considerate, and should bring value to our community and enhance it for everyone. Our primary concerns with the Coral Mountain Resort are environmental and zoning. Although Kelly Slater, champion surfer and founder of the Kelly Slater Wave Co., seems to care about environmental issues, we believe that the investor Big Sky Wave Developments and developer Meriweather Companies are not concerned with the long-term environmental impact. Thank you for your consideration. We are sure that the City will take the time to read and seriously consider all the comments from their residents. Sally and Robert Arroyo Coral Mountain Estates 57712 Salida del Sol La Quinta, CA 92253 (760) 564-8126 Water and Energy Usage: 1) In an era of massive climate change the City of La Quinta should be asking the major question of where is the water coming from to sustain the resort. Surf parks require massive amounts of water and this resort will be no exception. We have seen estimates of 18 million gallons to fill the pool. In addition, this project will have to recover/refill water lost to evaporation that nearly equals the amount used to fill the pool. Add this to the amount of water used by residents, guests and commercial establishments as well as the golf course. Golf courses have the advantage of being able to use desert scaping and grey water for non -potable uses, resulting in less water use. The surf park will not be using grey water in their pool and while they should have a filtration system, that still does not lessen the water lost through evaporation. 2) With our sources of water in the Sierra Nevada and Rocky Mountains well below average, we shouldn't have to remind the City that we live in a desert and have just barely come out of a crippling drought, with another drought projected. It was also our understanding from CVWD that our own aquifer is declining and being strictly managed despite replenishing. Water is essential and a precious commodity. 3) This facility, with so much water usage, would also increase our already rising humidity. 4) We know that IID and Southern California Edison are our local energy providers and will provide power for the resort but there should be a provision for the resort/park to be at least powered partially by renewables such as wind and solar. It would be very easy to require solar panels on every structure to offset carbon -sourced electricity. 5) The City of La Quinta should also require a proposal from the developer of all the materials that could be used to 40(Page 1 of 3 mitigate their carbon footprint and should require a short- and long-term sustainability study. We would hope that the City and the developer also work with STOKE (Sustainable Tourism and Outdoors Kit for Evaluation https://www.stokecertified.com) to enhance the sustainability future of the project. STOKE certifications specialize in surf parks and ski parks. Zoning: 1) The zoning must remain as it is now. This is a residential area and should never be a commercial area. If zoning is changed to tourist commercial as requested, the required EIR will support unacceptable increases in noise, density, lighting, etc. So much is based on zoning and if the zoning is changed to what is proposed, then the City has completely diminished the environment and atmosphere of this part of the City. 2) The EIR must be based on current residential zoning. The initial area was zoned for low -density housing and a golf course which had low traffic and a very low noise level. To change it to tourist commercial and to allow for events will increase traffic, noise, etc. Noise impact: 1) If we understand this wave process correctly, the wave system works by way of a large engine running down a track with an attached hull pulled to create the waves. This machinery creates noise. And, at other surf parks, additional noise is created by a PA system that announces when the waves are coming, how much time a surfer has on their wave and, in between setups/waves, some type of entertainment or music. We think that the resort would try to keep it quieter for their residents and guests but sound still carries and the surrounding neighborhoods would be impacted. These noises would be heard from probably 7:00 or 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. every day, seven days a week. 2) This proposal appears to significantly increase housing density with the addition of a hotel and more housing than is zoned now. Noise must not result from this. 3) Commercial type outdoor entertainment must not be allowed as that will also increase noise. Soundproofing should be required where appropriate. 4) Couple this daily noise with more traffic noise, particularly with commercial enterprises on one corner, possibly two corners of Madison Street and Avenue 58 and our once quiet desert will be unacceptably noisier. Light pollution: 1) Destruction of our Dark Skies mandates, as outlined by the City, County and State statues, will result from the proposed 80-foot light poles to allow for night surfing. An 80-foot light fixture is almost as tall as a ten story building. 2) As currently zoned, regular residential street lighting or mandatory house -number lighting is on all night, every night and emits low levels of light. The proposed 600 homes and 150-key hotel will add much greater additional lights to the environment. Commercial lighting for the hotel and surf park would be much more intense than residential lighting and would be on all night, every night. Infrastructure: 40'Page 2 of 3 1) We understand the economic reasons for a project or any large project of this nature but will the economics outweigh the added need for more services from our Police, Fire, EMT, Library, City Hall, etc. Ultimately, as evidenced historically, taxes will have to be raised to pay for the additional population and raising taxes is not very popular or necessarily wise. In Addition: 1) We are saddened that the City of La Quinta has allowed the resort to abut Coral Mountain which is a popular place for hikers and horse riders. A buffer zone of donated land from the developer in good faith between the resort and Coral Mountain would have been nice to continue to create access to these popular walking/riding trails. As planned now part of that will be totally cut off to anyone other than members and guests of the surf park. Also along this same path are Native American petroglyphs which could be threatened with destruction. 2) The desert is a beautiful environment and many residents in La Quinta moved to La Quinta, "The Gem of the Desert," specifically because it was less dense, less commercial and less noisy than most of our other desert cities. Please be very careful in whatever you approve to maintain and enforce the residential qualities we enjoy. Please don't make the residents regret living here. 40Tage 3 of 3 Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 08:58:37 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Wave Park Development at Coral Mountain Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 7:32:39 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Ramon Baez To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: kellymbaez@gmail.com Attachments: Andalusia Backyard Southen West view Jpg, Public Notice - Coral Mountain Resort NOP.pdf, Coral Mountain Resort Notice of Preparation Document.pdf Attn: Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner City of La Quinta, CA Re: Coral Mountain Resort Amendment V Dear Ms. Criste, My name is Ramon F. Baez, a homeowner at Andalusia Country Club for over 4 years. My wife, Kelly and I fell in love with the ambience of Andalusia the moment we drove through the gates in July of 2016. We are here now a good part of the year and we love the peaceful quiet, and beautiful canopy of stars that we enjoy each evening. The views of the Coral Mountains in the foreground of the Santa Rosa Mountains, coupled with the serene beauty and quiet of the desert sky is a true natural marvel. I am not a fan of the Wave Park development on many levels, but most significantly I am concerned about the light pollution from the 80' towers that would spoil the night sky in this area. This would ruin the tranquil desert evenings. I have attached a view from our backyard and it would have a deleterious effect to this lovely view, especially at night. It would be like having a high school football stadium built adjacent to us and would be like having Friday night lights every night of the week. The City has prudently required an Environmental Impact Report be prepared in compliance with CEQA guidelines. I respectfully request that the public comment period for this development be extended to at least 30 days from receipt and distribution of the EIR so everyone can assess the impact this project will have on all our dear friends and neighbors at Andalusia and surrounding communities. Thank you for your consideration. Kind Regards, Ramon and Kelly Baez 81-245 Andalusia La Quinta, CA 92253 40Tage 1 of 1 Ad Im vow, Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 15:07:21 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Attn Ms. Nicole Suviat Criste; RE: proposed wave park at Coral Mountain Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 3:03:07 PM Pacific Standard Time From: bacon@srt.com To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Ms. Criste: My husband and I join our voices to the other residents of Andalusia Country Club who have expressed concern over the noise, light, and traffic pollution that will be created if the proposed wave park at Madison and 58th Street goes forward. We invested in a retirement home at Andalusia, in large part, because the community is small and quiet and remote. The added traffic, not to mention the visibility of the proposed Wavepark structure and lights from our very serene backyard view, will detract significantly from the tranquility of our location. Thank you for considering our objection and comments. Please add us to the list to receive Wavepark updates. Sincerely, Cathy Bacon Bruce & Cathy Bacon 81259 Andalusia La Quinta, CA 92253 405Page 1 of 1 Friday, March 19, 2021 at 16:52:49 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort and Wave Project / La Quinta Date: Friday, March 19, 2021 at 4:46:55 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Bruce T. Bauer To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov, Cheri Flores, Nicole Criste Attachments: image001.jpg, image002.jpg, 8 27 20 LTR LA QUINTA WAVE PROJECT.pdf Dear Ms. Nichole Sauviat Criste: Our office represents certain homeowners in The Quarry Homeowners Association with the City of La Quinta. We understand that you are the consulting planner for the City of La Quinta. We understand that the City of La Quinta has rightly decided that it will be preparing a new environmental impact report ("EIR") for the Coral Mountain Resort (the "Project.") In that regard, it has sent out a notice of preparation of an EIR for the Project. In considering the preparation of the EIR, please accept the enclosed August 27, 2020 letter, previously sent to the City of La Quinta, as our comments to the City of La Quinta's Notice of Preparation. Please contact me with any questions or comments you have regarding the enclosed. Always, Bruce T. Bauer V PALM SPR COF PRIWTON NEW YORK Bruce T. Bauer Of Counsel SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP 1800 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way, Palm Springs, California 92262 Phone (760) 322-2275 / Fax (760) 322-2107 https://sbemp.comI CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message, together with any documents, files and/or other messages attached to it is for the sole use of the intended recipients and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by telephone and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the United States Treasury Department you are hereby informed that any advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, marketing. 40EPage 1 of 1 S_ . BRUCE T. BAUER REPLY00 E. Tahquitz Canyon Way _ELAP ATTORNEY Palm Springs, California 92262 ADMITTED IN CA T (760) 322-2275 • F (760) 322-2107 A T T O R N E Y S bauer(d)sbemp.com August 27, 2020 Via Email & U.S. Mail Jon McMillen (jmcmillen@laquintaca.gov) City Manager, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Cheri Flores (clflores@laquintaca.gov) Planning Manager, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Nicole Sauviat Criste (ncriste@terranovaplanning.com) Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: The Coral Mountain Development / La Quinta Wave Park Dear Mr. McMillen and Ms. Flores and Ms. Criste: Our office represents certain homeowners in The Quarry Homeowners Association within the City of La Quinta (the "City"). 1. THE PROPOSED WAVE PROJECT We write to you regarding the City's consideration of a proposed development in the City. According to a press release issued in February 2020, Meriwether Companies and Big Sky Wave Developments announced plans for Coral Mountain, a master -planned resort community in the City. This project has come to be known the "Wave Project" because the centerpiece of the project is to be the "world's largest artificial wave" emanating out of Kelly Slater -designed wave basin which would hold about 18 million gallons of water. SLOVAK BARON EMPEY MURPHY & PINKNEY LLP Palm Springs, CA Indian Wells, CA Costa Mesa, CA San Diego, CA Princeton, NJ New York, NY T (760) 322-2275 T (760) 322- 9240 T (714) 435-9592 T (619) 501-4540 T (609) 955-3393 T (212) 829-4399 www.sbem%com 407 Jon McMillen, City Manager Cheri Flores. Planning Manager August 27, 2020 Page 2 The proposed Wave Project requested by applicant, CM Wave Development, LLC (the "Applicant"), would include a sports and wellness community in the City would consist of a full -service resort, residential homes, a private club, multiple dining venues and adventure sport offerings. The $200 million proposed Wave Project complex would have a 150-room hotel and up to 600 villa homes and would be situated on the grounds of what was a proposed and entitled low -density, golf -centered master -planned community sometimes referred to as the "Coral Mountain Project." 2. THE SCOPE OF THE PROPOSED WAVE PROJECT CONTINUES TO GROW FAR BEYOND WHAT WAS FORSEEN IN PRIOR ENTITLEMENTS. The scope of the Wave Project that the Applicant previously announced keeps growing. We have learned that the Applicant has requested that, in addition to the wave pool, sports park and 150-room hotel, that the City approve, 600 overnight rental villas (2 to 5 bedroom each), four (4) entertainment/special events (of four (4) days duration or 16 days and nights of special events per year) (the "Special Events"), and 60,000 square feet of neighborhood commercial uses on 7.8 acres. With the requested additional changes, the Applicant then is seeking permission to allow approval of an amusement and entertainment sports park with an enormous amount of overnight guests in excess of 4,000 per night ((one can estimate that it might have 600 overnight guests for its planned 150- room hotel (4 pillows per room x 150 rooms), plus 3,600 overnight guests for the planned 600-villas (averaging 3 bedrooms each, 6 pillows X 600=3,600 overnight), for a total over 4,000 overnight guests coming and going.) The Wave Project then promises to bring significant changes to the City and its surrounding and adjoining communities compared to what was previously approved for this area. Naturally, a project of this nature, that continually morphs and increases exponentially should be given additional scrutiny. In addition to the above activities of the hotel and villas, there are the 16 days of special events that the Applicant has requested. Each day of these televised special events might easily bring in tens of thousands (each event the Applicant would be permitted to have 2,500 guests per day — this would be in addition to the guests that are staying at the resort's villas and hotel) of additional people per day (and that does not include the days that will be needed for staging and dismantling of each of the weekend events.) We have no idea whether these special events will be synchronized to coincide during the otherwise busy Coachella and Stagecoach festival season — which would exacerbate and magnify exponentially an already congested time of the year. It is clear that the Wave Project bears NO relationship to the development that had been originally entitled for that area. We are concerned, however, that the City may allow the Applicant for the Wave Project to utilize existing entitlements, in part, that evaluated that golf -centered master planning community back in 2003, to entitle the Wave Project that is a development of an entirely different sort. The Wave Project is not akin to a low -density golf -centered master -planned community. No one can seriously contend such. Rather, ; Jon McMillen, City Manager Cheri Flores. Planning Manager August 27, 2020 Page 3 the Wave Project is a "horse of a different color' entirely and should not be able to utilize important components of existing entitlements such as an existing environmental impact report and zoning. The Wave Project, in reality, will be largely a commercial endeavor and not a residential development and will be more of an entertainment -based venue. The Wave Project will be comprised of a commercial /high -density project that will cause far more impact on the surrounding communities that could ever have been conceived in prior entitlements. The Project is not in keeping with the existing zoning. The quiet and serene atmosphere currently enjoyed by surrounding the residents in the City's neighborhoods will be destroyed. Moreover, the Wave Project will impact traffic, noise, native wildlife, crime, pollution, etc., in ways that could not have been conceived when the prior project was approved. As such, we do not believe the Wave Project, as proposed, should move forward with the City since it is not in keeping with the character and entitlements envisioned by the City and its residents. However, should the City consider the Wave Project it must do so under only the most exacting review standards. 3. AT A MINIMUM THE PROPOSED WAVE PROJECT WILL REQUIRE A FULL- SCALE EIR. We have learned too that the City has indicated that it may well permit the Applicant to evade a full blown EIR for the Wave Project. The City, in its June 2020, "Environmental Initial Study" indicated its likelihood that it would issue a mitigated negative declaration for the Wave Project (see, p. 12, of that document.) That would be grave error on the part of the City. In so finding, the City necessarily would have to make a finding that that the Project could have a "significant effect on the environment" however, it would have to have found that there would not be a significant effect because revisions in the Wave Project have been made by or agreed to by the Applicant. We cannot agree with that conclusion given the scope and scale of the Wave Project. We have concerns regarding the Wave Project and would urge the City adopt the following requirements in connection with any of its entitlement approvals: (1) Require the developer submit a new full and complete environmental impact report in connection with the Wave Project; (2) That in connection with any such EIR, the developer formulate mitigation schemes to solve any potential noise and traffic problems with the Wave Project; (3) That in connection with any such EIR, that all such related testing for any possible mitigations measures be undertaken during normal traffic patterns that one would find at "high" season (including festival season since the 409 Jon McMillen, City Manager Cheri Flores. Planning Manager August 27, 2020 Page 4 Wave Project will be constructed near the grounds for the Coachella Festival); and, (4) Finally, that in connection with any such EIR, that data from the Kelly Slater Surf Ranch (located in Lemoore, CA), be used to analyze the Wave Project (and at a time when that facility is being fully utilized.) In short, given the significant impact that the Wave Project promises to make to the City, the City must insist upon the strictest review of the Wave Project going forward and cannot abide by the issuance of a mitigated negative declaration by the City. 4. BACKGROUND AND NEED FOR FULL CEQA REVIEW AND AN EIR. The Andalusia Specific Plan, in which the Wave Project occurs, was approved by the County of Riverside in 1988 as part of the Rancho La Quinta Specific Plan. At the time of the original County approval, the County also certified an environmental impact report (EIR 232 for SP 218)(the "1988 EIR") which included what are now the Trilogy and Andalusia projects. That project would have resulted in 4,262 residential units, 380 acres of golf course, and 35 acres of commercial development. In 2000, the County approved Amendment # 1 to the Specific Plan, which renamed the proposed project "Coral Mountain," reduced the maximum dwelling units to 2,762, increased golf course lands to 567 acres, and decreased commercial lands to 23 acres. At that time, the County also processed Addendum # 1 to EIR 232, and certified that document. In 2002, the entire Coral Canyon project was annexed into the City. As part of the annexation process, the City accepted, as is the norm, the County' s approvals, and agreed to allow development of the Coral Canyon Specific Plan per County approvals. A. The Coral Mountain Proiect. In 2003, the Andalusia Specific Plan, consisting of the northerly half of the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, and allowing up to 1,400 residential units, 10 acres of commercial development and 421 acres of golf course, was separated from the balance of the original County Specific Plan. At that time, the City adopted Environmental Assessment 2003- 483 for the Specific Plan (the "2003 EIR".) As such, the Coral Mountain Project was conceived as a residential master -planned community built around a golf course. B. The Applicant's Acquisition of Coral Mountain and Re -Conception of that Project into a Major Entertainment Hub. 410 Jon McMillen, City Manager Cheri Flores. Planning Manager August 27, 2020 Page 5 In May 2019, Meriwether Companies acquired Coral Mountain, a 400-acre land parcel (for $29M) located in La Quinta, CA in the eastern quadrant of the Coachella Valley. It became immediately apparent that the Applicant had entirely different plans for Coral Mountain. The Applicant conception of Coral Mountain had fundamentally changed into a vision that it would be developed, instead, into a busy, commercial endeavor with a large influx of overnight visitors and an entertainment hub. On, September 12, 2019, a planning application for the Wave Project, also referred to Andalusia West, was filed by the applicant, CM Wave Development, LLC (Garret Simon). In that application, they sought the following items/approvals: • Tentative Tract Map • General Plan Amendment • Specific Plan Amendment • Zone Change • Environmental Assessment In the City's letter to the Applicant, dated January 13, 2019 (in actuality the letter should have been dated January 13, 2020), the City noted that the applicable existing CEQA document for the Andalusia Specific Plan was the 2003 EIR, certified by the City in December of 2003. Also as stated in that letter, the Applicant indicated its belief that the Wave Project should be reviewed through an Addendum the 1988 EIR. The City found correctly at the time of the January 13t" letter, that the information contained in 2003 EIR was outdated. Moreover, the City correctly noted, as follows: "... [T]he information contained in [the 2003 EIR] is outdated, and did not address greenhouse gas emissions, energy impacts, tribal cultural resources or wildfire impacts at all. It also analyzed a golf- centered master planned community and not a hotel or 15-acre surf pool. All of these changes and unaddressed environmental issue areas are part of the CEQA documentation process now and must be addressed if the City is to adequately analyze the project under CEQA. Under Section 15164, an "addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15152... have occurred." The City was correct then. The 2003 EIR is not a proper starting point for a project of the magnitude proposed by the Applicant. This conclusion is all the more important given recent CEQA developments that now require a much more stringent review of the impact of traffic on a proposed project. We first discuss requirements of CEQA and, then, we will address how those requirements must be satisfied for the Wave Project to be approved by the City. 411 Jon McMillen, City Manager Cheri Flores. Planning Manager August 27, 2020 Page 6 C. CEQA Requirements. CEQA requires that an agency analyze the potential environmental impacts of its proposed actions in an environmental impact report ("EIR") (except in certain limited circumstances.) The EIR is the very heart of CEQA. 14 CCR § 15003. "The foremost principle in interpreting CEQA is that the Legislature intended [CEQA] to be read so as to afford the fullest possible protection to the environment within the reasonable scope of the statutory language." Communities for a Better Environment v. Calif. Resources Agency (2002) 103 Cal. App. 4th 98. It is beyond dispute, then, that CEQA should apply to the Wave Project unless there was, and is, an exemption to its requirements that would otherwise apply. Given the Wave Project's expected dramatic impact on the public, there is no known exemption that would apply here. Rather, given its dramatic impact, the need for a thorough CEQA analysis and EIR of the Wave Project is underscored. D. CEQA Has a Strong Presumption in Favor of EIR Preparation. A strong presumption in favor of requiring preparation of an EIR is built into CEQA which is reflected in what is known as the "fair argument" standard, under which an agency must prepare an EIR whenever substantial evidence in the record supports a fair argument that a project may have a significant effect on the environment. No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (1974) 13 Cal.3d 68, 75. 82; Friends of `B 'St. v. City of Haywood (1980) 106 Cal.App.3d 988, 1002. "The EIR is the primary means of achieving the Legislature's considered declaration that it is the policy of this state to 'take all action necessary to protect, rehabilitate, and enhance the environmental quality of the state.' [Citation.] The EIR is therefore 'the heart of CEQA.' [Citations.] An EIR is an 'environmental "alarm bell" whose purpose it is to alert the public and its responsible officials to environmental changes before they have reached ecological points of no return." Laurel Heights Improvement Assn. v. Regents of University of California (1988) 47 Cal .3d 376, 392. C. The 2003 EIR is not an Adequate Starting Point to Consider the Project. The City was right, in concluding that the above 2003 EIR was outdated and not a proper starting point for the Wave Project. The Wave Project is significantly different in comparison to Coral Mountain Project. There were, and are, significant differences in the considerations of the 2003 EIR, the Coral Mountain project and the Wave Project. In the 2003 EIR, the developer analyzed a golf -centered master planned community 412 Jon McMillen, City Manager Cheri Flores. Planning Manager August 27, 2020 Page 7 All of the unaddressed environmental issues of the Wave Project are part of the CEQA documentation process now and must be addressed if the City is to adequately analyze the Wave Project under CEQA. Additionally, starting July 1, the California Environmental Quality Act will require projects in California to account for how many new miles of automobile travel they produce, rather than how much congestion they produce. CEQA will instead require developers to measure how many miles of vehicle travel a project will produce. The effect on cities may not be immediate, but it will be profound in the long run. It has the potential to change the way planners consider projects, to end long-standing practices that encourage car dependence, and to prioritize infill, mixed -use, and transit -oriented development rather than sprawl and edge development. L The Traffic Analysis Must Contain Certain Information. Any traffic study that addresses the Wave Project's potential impact on traffic in the surrounding area must address concerns under Senate Bill 743 (SB 743). SB 743 changes the focus of transportation impact analysis in CEQA from measuring impacts to drivers, to measuring the impact of driving. The change is being made by replacing level of service ("LOS") with vehicle miles of travel (VMT) and providing streamlined review of land use and transportation projects that will help reduce future VMT growth. This shift in transportation impact focus is expected to better align transportation impact analysis and mitigation outcomes with the State's goals to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, encourage infill development, and improve public health through more active transportation. Those change were only recently adopted. The Natural Resources Agency finalized updates to the CEQA Guidelines including the incorporation of SB 743 modifications. The Guidelines changes were approved by the Office of Administrative Law and are now in effect. The Wave Project is certainly not consistent with State guidelines to reduce GHG emissions and enhancement of active transportation. Not only does any existing traffic study fail to address the Wave Project's compliance with SB 743, it does not disclose potential impacts from an increase in VMT. ii. Negative Impacts to Sound Quality from Noise from the Wave Project will be Considerable. The Applicant must also properly analyze and mitigate significant impacts from noise from the Wave Project. As pointed out, the noise attendant to the Coral Mountain Project, and the project envisioned by Applicant, are two entirely different projects. The former project envisioned a quiet golf -based community with little noise emanating from that project. The latter project, however, anticipates that the Applicant will be conducted concerts and hosting large-scale surfing venues with music. The City enjoys an enviable quiet environment that must be considered and not compromised in the manner sought by Applicant. The City 413 Jon McMillen, City Manager Cheri Flores. Planning Manager August 27, 2020 Page 8 generally enjoys a quiet noise environment, with existing community noise being dominated by highway and local traffic, intermittent aircraft flyovers, and commercial operations. Low noise levels are considered to be a major economic asset of the City's resort and residential atmosphere. As such, the City should carefully review proposals such as the Wave Project which we believe to be incompatible with the quiet environment present in the City and that it should be avoided. The Wave Project would be located very close to many noise sensitive receptors, including residential units. The type of development contemplated are known to create many noise impacts, including noise from patrons shouting, operating stereos in their cars, slamming doors, and honking in the drive-thru lane. Despite the City's alleged committed to "quietude" in the City, it only discusses the potential impact of the operational noise generated by the Wave Project in one short paragraph (most of which only pertains to the construction of the Wave Project): Construction of the Wave Project would generate sporadic, temporary vibration effects adjacent to the Wave Project area but would not be expected to exceed the significance thresholds. Operation of the Wave Project would generate noise from project -related traffic or from on -site sources (drive -through queuing, parking, amplified speech emanating from the speaker and trash compactor) that would not exceed the significance thresholds. Agenda, Staff Report, p. 5-22. The City has failed to properly analyze and mitigate significant impacts from noise. As such, the City has not reasonably demonstrated that the Wave Project would not result in significant impacts to noise quality and therefore does not qualify for the In -fill Exemption. iii. Negative Impacts to Air Qualitv from the Wave Proiect will be Considerable. The Wave Project could result in significant impacts health effects from air quality emissions. In Sierra Club v. County of Fresno (Friant Ranch, L.P.) (2018) 6 Cal.5th 502, the Court held that air quality analysis must make a reasonable effort to substantively connect a project's air quality impacts to likely health consequences. Any consideration of air quality must address the health effects to nearby sensitive receptors from the large quantity of idling vehicles consistent with a development of the type sought by Applicant. The analysis, in order to actually demonstrate that there are no significant impacts to air quality, is required to "connect" adverse human health effects to the levels of pollutants that would be emitted by the Wave Project. 414 Jon McMillen, City Manager Cheri Flores. Planning Manager August 27, 2020 Page 9 CONCLUSION Based on the above concerns, it is urged that the City does not approve the Wave Project as proposed by Applicant. In any event, at a minimum, the City must require the Applicant to submit a full environmental impact for the proposed Wave Project and, in any such report, that the Applicant formulate mitigation schemes to solve any potential noise and traffic problems at the Wave Project. CC: Linda Evans, Mayor (levans@laquintaca.gov) John Pena, Mayor Pro Tern Qpena@laquintaca.gov) Kathleen Fitzpatrick, Council Member (kfitzpartick@laquintaca.gov) Robert Radi, Council Member (rradi@laquintaca.gov) Steve Sanchez, Council Member (ssanches@laquintaca.gov) 415 Saturday, April 3, 2021 at 11:31:08 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Opposition to Proposed Zoning Change of Coral Mountain Tract Date: Friday, April 2, 2021 at 4:34:58 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Beth Beghou To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Eric Beghou, bbeghou@mac.com Attachments: Coral Mountain Resort - Opposition to Proposed Zoning Change - Beth and Eric Beghou 4-2- 2021.pdf Ms. Criste, Attached please find a document that includes the following text below regarding our opposition to the proposed zoning change for the Coral Mountain tract of land across from Andalusia. I am including both forms for your convenience. Thank you for your attention. Beth Beghou Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Opposition to Proposed Zoning Change for Coral Mountain Resort Dear Ms. Criste, As 13-year homeowners at Andalusia in La Quinta, we strongly oppose the proposed zoning change to Commercial for the Coral Mountain land across from us as we feel it will forever negatively change this beautiful part of the desert that we, and so many people, call home. The developers described the overall objective to "create an upscale private resort community." After having studied the February 2021 Notice of Preparation, we feel like this will not at all resemble the beautiful upscale private communities that surround it. The developer is asking for 31% of this land to be zoned "Tourist Commercial" (121 of 386 acres). Phase One of the development will consist of a wave machine attraction, a 150-person hotel, 104 casita unit rentals, and what looks like approximately 25 residences. There is also a public restaurant and shopping planned, and as hoped by the developer, numerous annual events to draw in more public to the area. This type of tourist commercial development is not in line with any of the surrounding communities here in this part of the desert, the gem of La Quinta. We understand that the developer hopes to sell individual homes in future phases; we know from experience at Andalusia the real estate market cannot be counted on. Even if all of the planned individual homes are sold, and the balance is slightly tipped towards individual home owners, by allowing short-term rentals managed by the commercial owners, the land will not feel like a "private resort community," instead, one where there are hundreds of non-residents going in and out of the development on a daily basis. At the center of our opposition, of course, is the attraction being built on this commercial tourist land, the surf -wave machine. We are extremely concerned about this as an attraction, and feel very strongly that at a 41 EPage 1 of 2 minimum it should not be allowed to run after sunset. Basic science shows that sound travels much farther at night than during the day_, as soundwaves bend downwards towards the cooler ground. In addition, the 80 foot lights that are to reflect on the wave machine will undoubtedly further add light pollution to the beautiful coral mountain and dull our beautiful starry black night skies. We are in strong opposition of this development as currently planned. We ask you to study development plans very closely and consider the character of this part of the desert and how it will be impacted by this tourist development, especially considering our noise and light pollution, and the short-term traffic that will change the characteristics of our community. We specifically are asking you to: - Not approve the Tourist Commercial part of the zoning request o Enforce the goal of a "private resort community," with private homes prioritized, only allowing monthly rentals like our Andalusia community, and see if there is appetite for the 496 planned private homes to support the surf wave - Not allow the possibility of evening hour surfing, with no installation of 80' lights next to Coral Mountain o Our community does not have evening golf, and we have strict limitations as to what can be lit up at night, and want similar restrictions for our neighbors - Make sure all EIR studies regarding light and sound impact are done at multiple times of the day, including late evening, as the evening impact is significantly different from the daytime impact. Thank you for your consideration and for reading our serious concerns regarding this development. Please let us know if you have any questions or would like further input. Sincerely, Beth & Eric Beghou 58-265 Carmona 81-537 Ronda (new home we are building) La Quinta, CA 92253 Cell phones: 847-910-6583 Beth 847-833-3134 Eric 417Page 2 of 2 Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 14:54:26 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave Park Date: Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 2:52:14 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Philip B To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Attachments: Screen Shot 2021-01-18 at 4.05.41 PM.png To whom this may concern, My name is Philip Berkovitz, I have been residing at 57852 Salida del Sol in La Quinta California for the last eight years. Our family house orientates to the south, throughout the day and especially the evening ALL SOUNDS can be heard echoing from small conversations to a duck quacking to coyotes howling, dogs barking and GUNS from people shooting bottles and more, cars and trucks going by and all echoing and reverberating SUPER LOUDI 11 We ALL live in a vacuum in south la quinta, If you put a wave park across the street from us, we will have the sounds of hydraulics and screaming people echoing throughout this valley and in our face. also, we can hear the music from the polo fields for Coachella festival and Stage coach and that is 5 miles away, This needs to be taken into consideration before a large body of water with no natural flow is put in the middle of the desert in hopes that in time and with age and economic conditions it will never sit stagnant at any point and turn into the next Salton Sea situation. This Kooky concept really needs to be examined closely to see if it makes sense for not just money/commerce but for the residents that have been residing here in peace and have invested here. This idea needs been thought through and realized that we the residents will suffer. We also appreciate La Quinta for the banning of light pollution... How is that going to work with stadium lights on a wave park? Philip Berkovitz CCO Philip B@ Botanicals 9053 Nemo Street West Hollywood, CA 90069 Office: (310) 274-2100 philip@philipb.com www.philipb.com Z •a YEAR' y� �49 TANICP��'4. This communication (including any attachments) may contain privileged or confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this communication and/or shred the materials and any attachments and are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this communication, or the taking of any action based on it, is strictly prohibited B 41 EPage 1 of 2 philip@philipbxom 41 gage 2 of 2 Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 09:30:34 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Re: NOP Coral Mountain Resort --City of La Quinta I Bettencourt reply. Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 9:29:45 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Nicole Criste To: Cheri Flores From: Philip Bettencourt <philip@bettencourtplans.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 2, 2021 1:55 PM To: consultingplanner@laquntaca.gov Cc: Danny Castro <dcastro@laquintaca.gov>; Cheri Flores <clflores@laquintaca.gov>; 'P. F. Bettencourt' <pbcourt2018@gmail.com>; Svirgin@rivco.org Subject: RE: NOP Coral Mountain Resort --City of La Quinta I Bettencourt reply. EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. City colleagues, I am writing to respond to the invitation to comment on the City of La Quinta Notice of Preparation for the proposed Coral Mountain Resort that we received through the courtesies of Ms. Stephanie Virgen in the off ice of supervisor V. Manual Perez. Although I am a member of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission my questions and comments are entirely my own and are not necessarily supported by others. • Related Projects. Will the document include a list of nearby potentially impactful projects both inside and outside the City limits of La Quinta including the on -going Vista Santa Rosa properties? • Is a Development Agreement part of the proposed entitlements; and if not proposed by the Applicant, would such an agreement help advance and protect the public interest? • Does the project contemplate an amendment to current city boundaries or the City's adopted Sphere of Influence? • Does the project contemplate any changes to the County's Master Plan of Arterial Highways 42CPage 1 of 3 • Are FEMA map revisions required? • Is any public investment in needed infrastructure required? • Will the Developer be providing a draft Fiscal Impact report as an element of the entitlement proceedings? • Has the Applicant proposed, or will the City propose, a regulatory Phasing Plan to be sure that future public improvements to make the project function properly are in place in a timely fashion? • Is the water district all ready on board with the wave pool? • Do any of the planned dwelling units provide an opportunity to backf ill any of the City's pending RHNA requirements - goals? • Are there any public policy requirements to determine gating policies for the future communities -products particularly when visitor serving uses and residential uses are planned in close proximity? • Under our existing statues how does "Commercial" sq footage differ from visitor serving sq footage of retail -service commercial? • Any there any water pressure service zone issued here? • Is any of the current documentation and studies from the original Andalusia FEIR being carried over to this new document? • Is the Site Development Permit (discretionary) only applicable to the Wave Pool or to other aspects of the project as well? • Will traffic studies include assumptions for the number of future service employees -contractors to serve the various properties? • This is being advertised as a specific plan amendment yet there is no apparent relationship (or ownership) with the "old" Andalusia Specific Plan and the "new" proposed Coral Mountain Plan. Please explain. Thank you for your consideration. Good luck with your important work. 42-Page 2 of 3 Philip F. & Meredith Bettencourt 79-730 Rancho La Quinta Drive La Quinta, CA 92253-6324 From: Virgen, Stephanie <SVirgen@rivco.org> Sent: Friday, February 19, 20214:40 PM To: Virgen, Stephanie <SVirgen@rivco.org> Subject: NOP Coral Mountain Resort --City of La Quinta Good afternoon members of the community, Attached is a Notice of Preparation from the City of La Quinta on a project —Coral Mountain Resort-- close to the community of Vista Santa Rosa. Please take a look at the attached NOP for more information. Stephanie Virgen Human Services Liaison Riverside County Supervisor V. Manuel Perez 73-710 Fred Waring Drive, Suite 222 Palm Desert, CA 92260-2574 1 760-863-8211 E: SVirgen@rivco.org I www.rivco4.org nfidentiality Disclaimer its email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to whom it is addressed. The information contained in this essage may be privileged and confidential and protected from disclosure. you are not the author's intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, rwarding, printing, or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error please delete all copies, both ectronic and printed, and contact the author immediately. ounty of Riverside California 42Tage 3 of 3 Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 09:29:45 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave Park -La Quinta Date: Friday, March 19, 2021 at 9:14:22 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Anne Birdsong To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Hello, I just moved to Andalusia in La Quinta from Lafayette California. My impetus was the sheer beauty of this development and its surrounding neighborhoods of low level single family residences, surrounded by our mountains and star filled skies. This is a well managed city with gorgeous developments each holding their unique charm while respecting the abundance of untouched natural systems that surround us. Many outdoor activities fill our days. Golf, tennis, walking, hiking, biking, reading and reflecting throughout our many quaint areas. Evenings include small, understated at home dinners, outdoor dining, and conversations. We respect the privacy and peace we share with our neighbors Northern and Southern California's traffic, noise and intense commercial development are in the news daily. Please don't allow such an unnatural, intense, commercial Wave Park development sully the peaceful hometown of La Quinta. Respectfully, Anne Birdsong 58420 Aracena La Quinta 415 602 0433 Member/Full Time Homeowner Andalusia Golf and Racquet Club Sent from my iPhone 42yage 1 of 1 Friday, April 2, 2021 at 15:36:31 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Comments Regarding the Proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort Date: Friday, April 2, 2021 at 3:20:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Susan Bittante To: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov Hi Nicole, We are residents of Trilogy, since May 2014. We also reside on Galiano Island, British Columbia. Unfortunately, because of the pandemic, we have not been able to spend time in our California home this winter. After watching the Zoom meeting regarding the proposed wave park resort, we concur with all the comments opposing this development. La Quinta is `The Gem of the Desert'. It would be terrible to destroy its natural beauty with this proposed amusement park. The issues of air quality, water, noise, traffic, esthetics, safety were succinctly addressed. We also do not want this project to be approved. Sincerely, Gino & Susan Bittante 81591 Desert Willow Drive Sent from my iPad 424Page 1 of 1 Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 14:50:55 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: FW: Opposition to Coral Mountain Surf Park Resort Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 2:21:40 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Kae Bletcher To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov To Whom It May Concern: I am voicing my opposition to the Coral Mountain Surf Park, for the following reasons. I have lived in Trilogy LaQuinta for 14 years and have enjoyed the peace and quiet of living away from the traffic and noise. I believe that this resort would take away from the lifestyle I have come to enjoy. I also believe that it would reduce our property values The extra traffic on our streets would do more damage than good. The heavy equipment during the course of building the resort would be damaging, as well as very noisy. And once the resort is finished, the extra tourist traffic on our streets would be of no benefit to the residents living out here. Thank you for your consideration, Kathleen M Bletcher 760-771-3140 Trilogy LaQuinta 425Page 1 of 1 Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 08:47:24 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Wave Park Project Date: Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 7:48:53 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Rick & Sherida Bradley To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov We support approval of the Wave Park Project. As residents of Trilogy La Quinta, we feel this development will enhance the area and bring much needed revenue to the city. Rick and Sherida Bradley 81553 Rustic Canyon Drive La Quinta, 92253 Sent from my iPad 42EPage 1 of 1 Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 09:32:43 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave park Date: Friday, March 19, 2021 at 8:01:30 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: itsmerlb1129@aol.com To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Ron Braver Ms. Sauviat Criste Consulting planner City of LaQuinta I am writing to beg you to please reconsider building the wave park in LaQuinta. I feel there should be a much tougher review of the projected plan. I am building my dream retirement home in Andalusia. I chose this location for the beautiful neighborhood, un congested roads, and peaceful location. I feel building the wave park as planned will hinder all my reasons for deciding to buy in Andalusia. To have tall lights illuminating the park along with several other reasons, I feel that the proposal should be reviewed with much more scrutiny. Please don't ruin my retirement! I have worked hard all my life and am looking forward to a peaceful retirement. Please help me achieve this. Thanks, Ron Braver 81706 Ronda LaQuinta,Ca. 92253 427Page 1 of 1 Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 09:28:21 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Fwd: Failure Notice Date: Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 9:22:54 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Roberta Braver To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Roberta :) Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Roberta Braver <roberta.braver@aol.com> Date: March 20, 2021 at 10:44:44 AM CDT To: Ron Braver <ron.braver@ rbraverassociates.com> Subject: Fwd: Failure Notice Please print Roberta :) Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: roberta.braver@aol.com Date: March 19, 2021 at 10:04:46 PM CDT To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Subject: Fwd: Failure Notice Reply -To: roberta.braver@aol.com -----Original Message ----- From: MAILER-DAEMON@aol.com To: roberta.braver@aol.com Sent: Fri, Mar 19, 2021 9:48 pm Subject: Failure Notice Sorry, we were unable to deliver your message to the following address. <consutingplanner@ laquintaca.gov>: 550: 5.4.1 Recipient address rejected: Access denied. AS(201806281) [DM3GCCO2FT005.eop gcc02. prod. protection.outlook.com] ---------- Forwarded message ---------- To: Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta Ms. Sauviat Criste, 42EPage 1 of 2 This email is in regards to the project plan to build the wave/surf park in La Quinta. After reviewing the information about the park I feel there needs to be a much tougher review of the projected plan. I recently purchased a home in Andalusia and I am shocked at the difference between what I thought was getting built and the actual proposed plan. Besides the fact that the once quiet and serene neighborhood will become full of traffic, bright lights, and especially the seismic disturbance, I feel the planning committee must reevaluate if this park will be a good thing for LaQuinta or if it will hurt the naturally beautiful and serene location that I have chosen as my retirement destination. Please reconsider the building of this park I hope I will be able to enjoy my retirement in a peaceful neighborhood. Thank you for your time. Roberta Braver 81706 Ronda LaQuinta, Ca 92253 42gl�age 2 of 2 Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 12:43:41 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Surf Resort - Concerns Date: Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 11:36:09 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Chris Brimble To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Nicole Sauviat Criste, Firstly, I want to thank you for the opportunity to provide input on the proposed development - I believe that it is the individuals and the voice of a community in concert with the location, geography, and architecture that truly define what a community is and what it can be. La Quinta is emblematic of how good planning, amazing geography, and invested residents can build an incredible community. I am writing to ensure we can retain what we have built and continue to build. I've been coming to the desert for 25 years - half my life, and decided to invest and make this our home in 2018. After searching from Palm Springs to the south end of the valley, we knew that La Quinta delivered exactly the lifestyle we were looking for. Centralized retail/commercial corridors, planned quiet communities, hiking, recreation, clean, and a true sense of connection with our fellow residents, the landscape, the wildlife, and neighboring communities. We live just a 2 minute walk from the proposed surfing -centric resort/living development and it's noise pollution, light pollution, transient/turnover based occupancy, traffic - and all that comes with it (noise, pollution, litter), will have devastating short and long-term effects on our entire community and its reputation. Here are just some of my concerns: - Noise Pollution: music, announcements, mechanicals - Light Pollution (80' light poles!?!?!?!). KEEP OUR DARK SKIES! - Traffic Congestion - Traffic Pollution/Noise/Exhaust - Litter, Litter, Litter - Environmental Impact: Geography, Wildlife - Neighborhood Impact: Commercial Development drives up CRIME, Commercial development welcomes transients/homeless, - 10+ years of construction noise, dust - Stripping the character of LQ - Insane water consumption/use - Adding surrounding commercial development: means gas stations and convenience stores (which exacerbate every issue above!) Each week, twice a week, I see the same couple walking Madison between the proposed site and the Fire Station - up and down both sides of the street picking up litter and trash on their own. They have trash picking sticks and bags. More importantly they have a sense of pride and a commitment to keeping out community clean - it's sad they have to do this at all but the lack of respect for our community and litter will only worsen with more transient/short-term visitors. I only hope you all see past the appeal of potential tax revenues and have the same sense of commitment as the couple I mention to keeping our community the wonderful place it is. Planning appropriate expansion is critical to retaining our appeal and our home. A resort and spa? Fine and welcome. A wave pool, surf resort, skate park, with 80' light poles? A permanent stain on La Quinta. I'm certain Kelly Slater and the developers can find a more suitable location for this type of "resort." The proposed development is out of character with this quiet corner of La Quinta deserves to be respected and treated to preservation and properly planned community development. We ask you and your colleagues to reject the proposed development. 43(Page 1 of 2 Thank you, Chris Brimble & Rick Caroto 619.742.1179 La Quinta, CA 43'Page 2 of 2 Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 13:34:48 Pacific Standard Time Subject: In favor of new development Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 1:15:49 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Elaine Brown To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov As a 16 year resident of Trilogy I am totally looking forward to the wave park/ residential/hotel development planned at 58th and Madison. I have read complaints on next door from different homeowners that live here at Trilogy and they are basically the same people that complain about everything!! Don't let the few hurt the possibility of helping the entire city. Thankyou William Brown 81855 Golden Star Way La Quinta, Ca 92252 43Tage 1 of 1 Monday, March 8, 2021 at 17:13:34 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Surf Park development at Coral Mountain Date: Monday, March 8, 2021 at 2:33:03 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Nancy Bruce To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Nicole Sauviat Criste, I am writing today to strongly oppose the proposed development at Coral Mountain in La Quinta. For me, and I'm sure my neighbors, we bought homes in a residential neighborhood with the expectation that we would be surrounded by other residential properties according to the current zoning. The proposal to change a huge swath of land from low density residential in this location to Tourist/ Commercial is appalling. No one bought a home in any of the areas surrounding this site thinking that someone would come in and build a Vegas type resort! My house faces West (looking straight at where the resort would be built) w/ a beautiful view of the Mountains. In that view I enjoy seeing a variety of birds, including song birds, hawks, falcons, owls and an almost nightly dance of bats. Coyotes can be heard regularly calling out to each other. This connection to nature is what drew me to this area. All of that would be lost if this development is approved. The noise would be non stop, not just with the influx of people and traffic, but the turbines to run the wave pool, the calling out every 5 minutes to get ready for the wave; changing forever a quiet corner of the desert. The plan for lighting is also of great concern. 80 foot lights will be seen throughout all of the developments surrounding the site and will light up the desert night -say goodbye to dark skies! And the environmental impact of this development has to be huge. The water district here monitors my minimal water usage every month and reminds me to conserve. We are given rebates to buy energy efficient appliances for both power and water. Water is in limited supply -we live in a desert! And so is power -every summer we are warned about brown outs when temperatures get high. Who is going to foot the bill for increased infrastructure to support this development? I sincerely hope the city will consider the thousands of homeowners who live in this area and leave the residential zoning in place. If people want a surf park let them build it in a more appropriate place than a quiet neighborhood. I appreciate you taking the time to read this. Sincerely, Nancy Bruce 80843 Calle Azul 43Tage 1 of 2 La Quinta, CA 92253 206 369-5067 434Page 2 of 2 Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 10:49:04 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave Park Coral Mountain Resort Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 10:19:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Burke, John To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Sarah "Nayong" Burke (sarahburke888@gmail.com) Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, Ca. 92253, Dear Ms Criste My wife and I have a home at 81805 Andalusia, La Quinta CA 92253. We are concerned with the proposed Wave Park at Coral Mountain Resort. We have concerns with the following items which we have noted in the city planning documents: Light pollution. This tract is in one of the last unspoiled areas of La Quinta where total darkness survives and our Andalusian observation of the beautiful desert night sky is uncompromised. This project proposes the installation of 80 ft high light poles all along the wave trench to allow for nighttime commercial activity which will likely completely obliterate the night sky. The area where the poles will sit is already about 20ft higher than Andalusia, which increases the likelihood that the emitted light will shine straight into our development. All desert cities have specific and strict rules on light pollution, so how come this can be tolerated by the city planners? And make no mistake, this will be 7 days per week all year long. Traffic and visual pollution. This tract was zoned to be a low density residential area (with full golf) and this new proposal will create substantial additional traffic to/from a full fledged commercial sports complex, hotel, multiple restaurants and higher density residential housing (up to 600 units — many likely short term rentals). The hotel, which was originally presented as two story maximum, is now planned as 4-story and will obstruct view of Coral Mountain from pretty much every residence with that view. Traffic on Madison will increase by many hundreds of vehicles. Noise pollution. The proposed wave equipment generates substantial and constant noise (minimum 75 decibels) that will travel far in the desert and is pretty much as if you are living next to a busy freeway. The developers admit that the wave operation will involve loudspeaker announcement of every wave. Noise pollution should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12. 4. Seismic disturbance. The proposed wave equipment by its very nature generates vibration (not to mention the additional seismic disturbance generated by the resulting wave crashing) which will easily travel long distances in the loose desert soil. Pool and jacuzzi leaks for the neighboring properties will not be far behind. Seismic disturbance should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12. 43,Tage 1 of 2 Quality of life reduction. The hours of operation of this facility have been insufficiently clarified but there is a distinct impression the wave operation may be started as early as 6 in the morning and go well into the night? This should be considered unacceptable in a once peaceful residential area where the only disturbance might be an errand golf ball. It totally ignores the original zoning intent for this tract. The zoning change request should be more thoroughly investigated and the change to commercial should be opposed. Thank you for your consideration. P. John Burke 310 490 5400 P. John Burke I Partner Emeritus AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 1999 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 600 Los Angeles, CA 90067 jburke@akingump.com I akingump.com I Bio Mobile 310 490 5400 *Partner Emeritus, no longer practicing at Akin Gump. The information contained in this e-mail message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. 43EPage 2 of 2 Friday, April 2, 2021 at 11:00:19 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Project EIR comments Date: Friday, April 2, 2021 at 10:52:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Alena Callimanis To: Consulting Planner CC: Cheri Flores Attachments: Alena Callimanis EIR WAVE POOL Water Comsumption.pdf Nicole, I want to thank you first for the amazing job you did managing the emails before the meeting and to hosting and managing a great hearing. I am including here water issues for the EIR. I am including the same comments here in this note and in the attached PDF, because I was not sure of the appropriate format. Thank you again for this opportunity. Sincerely, Alena Callimanis 81469 Rustic Canyon Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 919 606-6164 The Developer has stated that the consumption of water by a golf course is greater than that of the Wave Park. In discussions with fellow residents from areas surrounding the proposed Project, I have concerns about how this comment is substantiated. The above underlined statement is based on figures calculated by the Coachella Valley Water District for the Surf Park in Palm Desert, but has been used publicly by the Developer's representative in conversations and presentations to concerned residents. Background regarding my concerns with the CVWD calculations: While CVWD has been an excellent steward of our water system, it does not have expertise in Surf Parks. Its calculations are based on the average yearly evaporation of less than one inch per day per year. These evaporation numbers used by CVWD have not been updated since 2005 and we know the number of days over 100 ('triple digit temperatures") have been steadily increasing. Accordingly, CVWD's calculations do not take into consideration 140 days above 100 degree temperatures that would cause significantly more evaporation per day, based on information provided by pool companies in the Coachella Valley (between one inch to three inches, based on the heat). Also consider the following_please: The act of wave generation, launching water into the air, will accelerate evaporation. Therefore, the water consumption of artificially generated waves is higher than normal moving water rates used in CVWD's calculation and that must be taken into consideration in any water consumption calculations." Diane Rebryna presented the following at the Scoping Meeting of March 30, 2021, summarized here: Actual data published by the Kelley Slater Surf Ranch indicates that they lose around 250,000 gallons of water a day during their 40 hot days — please note that this is a smaller pool 437Page 1 of 2 than proposed for this Project. That equals 10 Million gallons is just the forty 100+ degree days. What about the rest of the year which has a large number of 90 degree+ and 80 degree+ days? The WADI Adventure Surf Park is in a desert location near Dubai. They must pump 1 million gallons of water a week through a 170 mile pipeline to replenish their water consumption throughout the park. That means 52 million gallons a year to replenish 10 million gallons of water park usage. Note: this park has a 3.8 million gallon wave pool, and a kayak and rafting river that uses 6.2 million gallons. The CVWD has calculated 38 million gallons of consumption a year based on the Coral Mountain Project Wave pool that will be 18 million gallons. It is apparent from the numbers above that CVWD is significantly underestimating water usage at this park and therefore at the other three proposed water parks in the Coachella Valley. The Desert Sun front page article on April 1, 2021, headlines "On tap in California: Another drought". Fourteen football fields of 3 to 6 feet of water is not a responsible use of water during a drought. And add to that three other wave pools in the works. In summary_ It is critical the EIR address the statement that the Developer continues to make which is the following "Golf course consumption of water is greater than that of the Wave Park". I respectfully ask please that there be a full investigation in the EIR into water consumption rates calculated for the proposed Project. (As an aside, the development should proceed as low density housing, as zoned, with no golf course and no water park. A golfing arrangement could be negotiated with Trilogy next door. That would mean an excellent compromise during draught times). 43EPage 2 of 2 Friday, April 2, 2021 at 11:46:06 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Alena Callimanis Public Comments on Noise issues for the EIR Date: Friday, April 2, 2021 at 11:18:25 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Alena Callimanis To: Consulting Planner CC: Cheri Flores Thank you again for the opportunity to comment for the EIR draft. For the sound analysis for this project, the EIR must consider noise echoing off Coral Mountain from the wave generation machine and the wave itself, plus all crowd, loud speaker, as well as traffic noise. The wave pool and the wave generation power unit and equipment are very close to the base of the mountain as shown in the NOP. Any professional analysis must simulate the wave sounds as well as the wave machinery sounds at the location where the wave pool is closest to the mountain. And please consider the number of times per hour these waves are generated. It is not once. It can be up to 15 times an hour. It is slated to be happening 7AM to 10PM. If not measured this way, noise results cannot be considered as valid. Contrary to the developer's claims, especially with the echoing, all the developments surrounding Coral Mountain, including the Quarry, will be impacted, as well as wildlife like the Big Horn Sheep. (We in Trilogy can hear the bullet sounds that echo from the Police firing range behind Lake Cahuilla). In addition, while Meriwether states that Lisa Castro's house is 870 feet from the Wave Pool, the roadway into the heart of the Commercial Tourist area is right along Ms. Castro's house. Having the roadway and all the delivery truck traffic plus access to the pool, casita and hotel parking, and crowd noise, the impact of that sound is immeasurable to her. Please reference NOP exhibit 5 to see how this development abuts to Ms. Castro's property. Ms. Castro has lived there for 30 years and it is incredible that the developer has no regard for Lisa's rights as a homeowner. The noise she will suffer goes totally against any noise ordinance by the City of La Quinta. Measurements should also be done at her property line for noise and light pollution and addressed in the EIR. In addition, traffic noise generated by the hotel and the STVR casita guests will impact all the developments as well. I would say at least 2000 cars on a regular basis - 150 hotel rooms - say 50 cars or more for the restaurant and bar - cars for short term renters and the support staff - restaurant, grounds, management company and maintenance crew for the hotel and pool, and long term construction workers. On special event days not only would you have additional attendees but there would also be cars and trucks for the television crew and seating for the additional people. How will this all be measured and taken into account for the EIR? Thank you for your consideration of these significant issues. Sincerely, Alena Callimanis 81469 Rustic Canyon Dr La Quinta, CA 92253 919 606-6164 43SPage 1 of 1 Monday, March 15, 2021 at 07:47:11 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Opposition to Coral Mountain Wave Park Date: Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 6:35:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Rachel Canchola To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov I am writing today as a Trilogy, La Quinta resident to voice my opposition to the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park. The proposed development would bring unwanted noise, traffic, and night lighting to a beautiful area where quiet and beauty has always been loved. We can still hear coyotes at night. Don't take our pristine area away from us. Your consideration is appreciated. Ruben and Rachel Canchola 81830 La Paz Court La Quinta, CA 92253 44(Page 1 of 1 Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov March 27, 2021 Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste, In 2003, 1 visited the La Quinta area for the first time and immediately fell in love with the beautiful mountains, the culture, the people and, most importantly, the peace and quiet. Since then I have returned many times for business, golf and family outings. Each time I was reminded that there actually was somewhere to go to disconnect while having access to many fine, luxurious services. So naturally, when my husband and I began looking for a second home, La Quinta was on the list. Throughout the process, it became evident that it was so much more than the other places I could visit and enjoy to get away from my past paced life. In fact, it was almost spiritual. While other locations had similar environments, none focused on peace or health & wellness to the same extent. The other locales were ove-crowded, noisy, congested and stressful. The traffic, the competition for resources, the party seekers all made other pristine communities almost undesirable. So here we are, two months into home ownership in Andalusia and we come to find out that the very reason we chose this location is now being threatened. The very last thing that this community needs is to devalue itself by trying to appeal to all types of interests. California has many opportunities to put in a Wave Park and I am sure Coachella North of Indio would be a much more fitting location. The transient nature of a surf park, hotel, condos and all of the businesses that would surround the area is the absolute last thing we wanted. It sounds more like a Jersey Shore environment than a place where legends once hit the links. Transient communities don't just bring traffic, noise and trashy stores, restaurants and bars. They bring crime. While many of us live behind the wall, none of us want to have to live behind a wall for safety. I am sure your council can find crime stats for such communities. Rather than sell out for tax revenue, how about continuing to invest in upscale luxury that draws more people like those living in La Quinta already? Protect the culture, beauty, elegance and charm of this community. It is one of the few I have encountered that make this area a perfect choice. Please don't sell out. Don't bring the Coachella music festival and its crowd to our beautiful area underneath the mountains. We don't want strip malls, surf shops and traffic. Let us continue to enjoy our surroundings and continue to share that experience with others that might choose a home here, becoming additive to our community; Instead of allowing visitors to pass through creating disturbance with loud noise, bright lights, thunderous waves, parking lots, traffic and a host of many undesirable characteristics. La Quinta and it's residents deserve better. Thank you for taking time to consider my position. Carollynn Caruso 441 Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 15:16:07 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: The Wave At Coral Mountain Date: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 at 3:06:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: guillermo casillas To: Consulting Planner There are so many reasons for not going through with The Project. Most Neighbors are not happy. There needs to be an organized list as to who will speak . Those who actually live next to the Project should be allowed to go 1st . Specifically, Mrs Lisa Castro as she has lived on 60th Avenue for 30 years. I'm not in favor of further development without concessions from the Developer and The City of La Quinta. - Infrastructure Concerns - Sewage , Electricity, Internet, Domestic Water, etc. - Excessive Traffic on 60th Ave. from Service Workers - No Service Entrance on 60th Ave. I reserve the right to add more concerns before the April 2nd Deadline Sent from my iPad 44Tage 1 of 1 Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 08:02:58 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort, Attn Nicole Sauviat Criste Date: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 at 6:56:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Lisa Castro To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Good Afternoon Nicole, My name is Lisa J. Castro. I live on the North West corner of Avenue 60th, that boarders the Coral Mountain Resort property. My late husband and I built our home in 1991, 30 years ago. We raised 3 beautiful children here and I fully expect to live the rest of my life here. We built our home here looking for the serenity that living "in town" could not give us. We have enjoyed hearing and seeing all of the animals and birds, that our desert offers. We have always been aware that a golf resort was planned for the open area, but never dream ed of a "water park" being developed. The wave park comes with a completely different set of complications. I have several questions and concerns about the Coral Mountain Resort project. My main concerns are: 1) Blowing dirt before and after construction. I have an air conditioning unit, an evaporative cooler system and a pool on the west side of my property. My property is downwind and will get dirt no matter how much water they use. a. What is the plan of action to keep dirt out of the air and maintaining current air quality levels for the duration of the 3-5 years of construction? I do not want to spend my days calling air quality control complaining about the amount of dirt in the air caused by construction. 2) The lights around the wave basin. The wave basin ends at the northwest corner of my property. The lights will bleed into the night, and light up the area. a. Doesn't the City of La Quinta have a light ordinance? 3) Traffic and the noise from the traffic, is a big concern. With the secondary entrance right next to my property, there will be lots of heavy equipment running up and down my street. And after completion of the project, all of the residential independent contractors only being allowed to use this entrance. I have a fear of being blocked in or out of getting into my own driveway. And the traffic from all of the concerts and competitions, will make it almost impossible for me. a. Will there be a 3rd entrance created to alleviate this problem? Or will I and all of the other houses being developed be forced to sit in traffic and be blocked out of our own homes? Or 4) Noise from the wave machine, loud speakers & music.The noise is going to bounce off of the mountain and be much louder than they are telling us. a. What is the city going to do if the noise is much louder than they are projecting? The sound of a lawn mower all day and night is not acceptable. Is the resort going to be forced to follow the 10:00pm noise ordinance set by the city? 5) Vibrations and Sinkholes from the impact of the wave machine being operated all day. a. What precautions are being taken for the surrounding area in relation to sink holes that can be caused by the vibrations of the wave machine? 6) In completion of the project. What happens if the developer decides to abandon the project half way through? We will be left with a blowing dirt and a mess to look at. Then what? a. What is the plan of action if the developer abandons the project? Will it be up to the city to maintain the air quality control of the construction that has ceased? These are some of my concerns. I appreciate your time and consideration of the people who will be living around this resort. I look forward to hearing back from you on the questions and concerns above. My ask is that you please reconsider this project Thank you, Lisa J. Castro 80-80 Avenue 60th La Quinta, CA 92253 44yage 1 of 1 Sunday, February 28, 2021 at 14:54:13 Pacific Standard Time Subject: "Coral mountain resort" Date: Saturday, February 27, 2021 at 1:36:00 PM Pacific Standard Time From: mike charles To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Attachments: Garrett Simon.pdf To: Nicole Sauviat Criste: Nicole, hope you are doing well. I have taken the time to review the dvd sent in the mail. Thank you for providing this. I would like to provide some comments. Please find enclosed my original letter sent to the city in regards to the "wave park" development. Subsequently, I have met with the developer, namely Garrett Simon, CM Wave Development LLC and participated in his presentation to residents of Andalusia some time ago. As the process moves forward my concerns, as a close resident, continue to be the following: Height of the Hotel. We were told the height would not exceed 25 feet, 2 stories. The ground elevation at the hotel location is higher than Madison ave thus making the hotel appear higher. I hope that this can be examined and hotel height minimized to reflect a true 25 feet. The intent is to preserve the natural beauty and observation from surrounding residences of the Santa Rosa Mountains. I did not see any affirmation to the hotel height in the dvd. That the Hotel color will blend into the mountain landscape. Andalusia has used a dull brown for its clubhouse bldgings which meets that need. That mature trees will be placed in front of the hotel so as to minimize its presence. That night lighting will be minimal so as to not disrupt existing and new residences. That noise limitations in evening hours will be created and enforced. I did see requests for 80 foot towers to accommodate light for evening use of the wave park. That was not included in Garretts presentation and therefore concerned about the gathered groups reaction that received his presentation. I would most likely not support 80 foot towers for two reasons. Height of towers interfering with the Santa Rosa Mountain scenic backdrop, especially since Coral Mountain has a lower height to observe. This mountain backdrop that many of us enjoy daily. Secondly, the observance of evening flood lights. A carnival, circus or racetrack comes to mind better placed away from the mountain. To light the wave will be approximately 2600 feet. Thats a long light up landing strip. I did not see their request for a 50 foot high safety tower which was part of Garretts presentation. 1 tower, 50 feet tall. Not 80 foot tall broadcast lights. Bottom line this is a commercial development, with some residences coming into a space that was forecast to be residential and a second golf course. Many of us bought our homes with that knowledge in tact until the sale of this property. Thank your for the consideration for these concerns. Mike Charles 81343 Andalusia, La Quinta, CA 92253 mgacharlesyahoo.com cell: 2-53-381-4565 444Page 1 of 2 Garrett Simon CM Wave Development LLC Mr Simon: My name is Mike Charles and I live at 81343 Andalusia. We have lived there for 61/2 years now. Prior to that we lived at PGA West for 12 years. We picked both locations because we are golfers but more importantly we adore the Santa Rosa mountains and their glory. Trilogy, The Quarry, and Andalusia, all close to the Wave Park proposed development share these pristine views. As well, Lions gate and additionally smaller developments. I believe that all would agree that at some day development would come to these acres in front of Coral mtn. As for me, when we bought our current house it was clearly stated that Drummond Corp would be building an additional golf course and additional housing on said property. Life was good. So now there is a proposal to build a wave park, hotel, and additional housing. I took the time to understand the wave park phenomenon. Still don't understand why the Coachella valley needs four of them. I visited the city of La Quinta and received maps and have had discussions with them in regards to the proposed project and specifically the height of the hotel. As a potential new neighbor in a very small community in this sub -area of La Quinta you can enter the space with a welcoming awareness to sensitivity and appreciate the pristine views or ignore why people have chosen to reside here and take an ag- gressive direction to suit your own needs. As this process is still very young, I wanted to provide some input to you specifical- ly in regards to the hotel and its height. The current proposal asks for a 40ft height. Elevation mapping shows an increased ground height at the building site as com- pared to Madison street of 14ft. That puts the hotel height at 54ft above the street height. The closeness of a 54ft hotel to the base of the Santa Rosas is making many residents very disturbed to put it politely. It will change the Western view permanently and not in a good way. It is my desire by bringing this to your attention to alleviate a lot of public hearing squabble, petition and cost to you in the upcoming process. While still in the development stage please appreciate the value of the view to exi- sting residents by considering the following: lower the height of the proposed hotel, detail the structure with exterior siding that blends into the mountains, ie Andalusia 445 clubhouse, plant mature palm trees and other trees in front of the structure to mask its appearance. In closing, each day more area residents are becoming aware of this proposal. Most are vehemently opposed to the project. I know development will occur, it just needs to be a good fit so as to preserve the beauty of the backdrop. Respectfully submitted, Mike Charles 446 Friday, March 19, 2021 at 08:46:13 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: La Quinta Proposed Wave Park Date: Friday, March 19, 2021 at 8:40:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Ron Coffey To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov La Quinta City Planing Commission I am not sure why the La Quinta City officials voted in for the good of its people would consider changing a residential zone into a commercial zone to accommodate a Theme Park?? Please tell me it's not for an increase in money for the City. There is a balance between City income and quality of life. This effort will tip that scale in the wrong direction in a big way We moved to La Quinta to experience a quite low key some what country life style. By allowing a theme park to be places into out community it is going to take all of that way for all the obvious reasons. The traffic will no doubt have a large increase. Not to mention a Hugh demand on our water and power resources. And then there is the noise level increase 24/7. My wife and I are urging you to Please not allow this Wave Park to be placed in our lovely town of La Quinta. COVID has been bad enough, don't add to the frustration. Ronald Coffey Ron Coffey ron@jdcoffey.com 707-373-5865 447Page 1 of 1 Monday, March 8, 2021 at 13:04:11 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Proposal for Surf Park Development at Coral Mountain Date: Monday, March 8, 2021 at 11:01:16 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Agnes Collins To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: council@la-quinta.org Dear Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta We have owned our property in Puerta Azul at 57th and Madison for the past 10 years. During that time, we have immensely enjoyed hiking, walking and cycling in our quiet peaceful community. We chose our home in La Quinta because we loved the beautiful natural environment. We have been informed about the proposal to build a surf park just a short distance from us at 58th and Madison. We are stunned to hear that this could actually happen in our quiet neighborhood. Apart from our very serious concerns about the environmental impact of this type of development, this is just the wrong area for a tourist/commercial development of this nature. While some may say it will increase the value of nearby properties, that is not the reason most of us purchased in this area. The proposed development will destroy the character of our quiet tranquil community. A Disney -like surf park may be desirable to developers, provide recreational opportunities for short term visitors and will no doubt increase the tax base but the increased noise, traffic and pollution will destroy the very reason that we moved to the area. Apart from these issues, we are even more concerned about the environmental sustainability of building such developments in the desert. We have read the developer's publications attempting to address environmental issues but we are also aware of the dire warnings of experts in the environmental field. Now is not a time for excess consumption, economic growth -seeking or projects disconnected from the environmental issues we face today. The reality of climate change should force us to rethink our growth models to reduce natural resource consumption and reconcile our relationship with nature. Please protect our community and our environment and do not allow this proposal to proceed in its current form. Respectfully Submitted Agnes Collins 80921 Calle Azul La Quinta, 92253 250-738-0545 Sent from my iPhone 44EPage 1 of 1 Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 06:40:35 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Opposition to proposed Wave Park Project Date: Monday, March 15, 2021 at 5:18:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Judy Collins To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Mayor Evans, City Council Members, and Planner Criste, As a resident of Trilogy at La Quinta I would like to voice my opposition to the proposed Wave Park project. The following are some of reasons: 1. The change in zoning is not consistent with the current zoning that is residential. This is a large commercial resort. 2. Having large stage and music events will result in significantly increased traffic, noise and lighting pollution. 3. The hours of operation of wave park from 7 am to 7/10 pm will generate significant noise as well as the use of loud speakers to surrounding homes. 4. Concern for light pollution caused by 80 foot light towers. 5. Project will have short term rentals The City has been researching the problems of short term rentals and there is a concern that these problems could result due to the large size of the homes. 6. Concern for water consumption needed to operate wave park. Water ground levels need to be conserved especially with the threat of severe drought due to the low snow and rainfall. 7. Lastly as an avid hiker of the Coral Mountain area hiking trails will be closed. Construction of this large project will destroy the nature beauty of the area which is rich in Indian history. Thank you for considering these points in evaluating this project for approval. Judy Collins 81817 Sun Cactus Lane La Quinta, CA 92253 Sent from my iPhone 44�Page 1 of 1 GERALD M. COOPER STEPHANIE BRADFIELD COOPER March 21, 2021 Nichole Soviet Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Via email: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Ms. Criste; We own property and have a home under construction at 81-594 Ronda, La Quinta in the Andalusia East parcel. We have reviewed the Notice of Preparation regarding and EIR for the Coral Mountain Resort and have a number of issues to bring up regarding the scope and content of the report. Our general impression is that this is not a resort, it is an amusement park, and that its development would be inconsistent with the current neighborhood, and therefore the EIR must be thorough in exploring this incompatibility. RE: Section 3.1 Project Objectives It is on its face ludicrous to assert as project objectives reduction of air emissions and greenhouse gas emissions; they will increase. And what is "healthful" noise? Coupled with the "Special Events" of thousands of people per year, all three of these matters must be carefully and independently explored in the EIR. RE: Section 4.2.1 Aesthetics This section needs a very deep dive into two particular areas: the views for the entire community as well as light pollution. What heights are proposed, and at what heights are views protected for the surrounding community? How much light, for how long 450 each day? Will neighbors still be able to see the night sky? What if the 80 foot light poles are reduced to 50'? 25'? 12'? RE: Section 4.2.10 Land Use Planning The Notice says that surrounding neighborhoods will not be impacted. We assert they will, especially as regards access, and this should be addressed. RE: Section 4.2.12 Noise How much noise? The EIR needs to translate the technical findings so that neighbors can understand how disruptive this may be. Will we now be living with freeway -like noise? What about the special events - will they create noise? What is "healthful" noise? RE: Section 4.2.16 Transportation How much wider will the streets be? Four lanes? Six lanes? Will speed limits increase? How much noise and pollution will be generated just from more cars? Parking for special events needs to be addressed, especially if the operators plan to use the proposed natural open space or streets outside the project. We hope that the EIR thoroughly addresses all these issues, and that the City will keep us informed at each step in the process. In that regard, please provide us information and notices by email at phaniecoop@gmail.com. Sincerely, Stephanie Bradfield Cooper (760) 914-2250 12haniecool2@gmail.com Gerald M. Cooper (818) 414-1813 jcoop1944@gmail.com 451 3/15/2021 Mail - billie costello - Outlook Nicol® Sauvlat Cristo RECEIVED Consulting Planner City of Le Quints 78-495 Calls Tampico Le Qulnta, CA 92253 MAR 19 2021 March 13, 2021 CITY OF LA QUINTA DESIGN AND DEVE� PMENT DrPA�TeMV�, I am writing today as a Trilogy La Qulnta resident to voice my opposition to the proposed Cora ounta n ark Resort development in La QUinta. Below is the summary of the development as presented by Merlwether Development, published press releases, and local newspaper articles: Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort will be a mega resort for over 4,800 overnight tourists, with a 17- Acre Wave Pool as the main attraction. 1, The Coral Mountain Resort will not be a residential neighborhood as It Is currently zoned. It instead will be a high energy Resort containing a 600+ person occupancy hotel complete with restaurants, bars, and entertainment all available on a per night basis. 2. The 600 "Dwelling Units" with unlimited number of bedrooms & bathrooms available for overnight rental, could easily have 4 bedrooms, allowing 8 guests per unit, 600 Units x 8 people= 4,800 people potentially staying In the Units. All units are available on an overnight Basis the same as the Hotel. The people coming to Coral Mountain are Vacationers, not Residents. 3, The Wave Park Coral Mountain will not be a Residential Neighborhood. This will be a commercial Resort with The Wave Park as the main feature, 4. The Wave Pool will cover 17 acres, a length of 2,600 feet, needing 18 million gallons of water to work, The Wave Pool water evaporation rate is 30,000 to 180,000 gallons of water daily. Plans Include stadium bleacher seating on each long side, and many 80' tall stadium- style lighting towers for Night Surfing, 5. Plans have the Wave Pool running 365 days a year from 7 am to 7 pm (some newspaper articles have stated it will run nightly until 10 pm) for the 4,800 tourists staying at the hotel or In a dwelling unit, 6. Loudspeakers projecting above The Wave Pool in all directions are needed for the Wave Pool Announcer to call the 30 second countdown for every single wave with up to 12 waves per hour, The surfer needs to be alerted for the coming Wave, as there Is no Ocean to watch or feel until "the big one" comes. A Wave is manufactured every 5 to 6 minutes, The noise level of the Wave crashing has been measured at 75 decibels at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch. This noise level Is comparable to the sound of cars traveling on a busy Interstate highway, The generators creating the waves will be running non-stop, every day. 7, Plans Include Music Stages for Entertainment at each end of The Wave Pool, and other locations in the Resort. 8. In addition to the Wave Pool, there will be more artificial lagoons and lakes for E-Foiling (a motorized hydrofoil paddle board that you stand on, not lie on) and Stand -Up paddle boarding. 9. Concrete sports parks for the Bike park with pump tracks for skateboarding, BMX, and mountain bikes — all with stadium style light towers. 10. Coral Mountain Resort has requested 16 days and nights for Special Events. 16 days Is more days than Coachella Fest and Stagecoach combinedl To make matters worse, the 16 days are spread out over four 4- day long weekends. Set up and take down for each Special Event Weekend will easily add another 32 days of high traffle conditions, 11, The 80' tall stadium style light towers illuminating The Wave Pool, swimming pools, Skateboard Park, BMX Track, other Sports Courts, acres of parking lots, streets, and 117,000 square feet of Commercial Buildings will be lit inside and out. The spill lighting will affect the surrounding community. No more dark skies. 12. The approval of this project will permanently bring light pollution, noise, and traffic. There will be permanent and on -going noise from the wave generators, breaking waves, the lodgers, guests, loudspeakers and entertainment venues on -site every day until late in the evening, 13. Heavy Construction equipment will be working at 85 decibels or more, non-stop all day long, for the next 10-20 years - (according to Coral Mountain developers own projection), 14. The project will scrape away every inch of biocrust", creating the need for even more Water Trucks to keep the dust down. "Biocrust "is to the Desert what "Tundra" Is to the high elevations. Both tundra and biocrust take many hundreds of years to replace once damaged. Think of the Impact on the Deserts already questionable water supply as just 2 years ago we were asked to dramatically cut back on water usage, Demands for water will only increase In future years. 15. This project will forever mar the stunning natural topography of the area, forever erasing the absolute silent evenings and dark skies enjoyed currently by all residents of the area. This Coral Mountain Resort project does not have any of the characteristics of the surrounding low- density up -scale residential neighborhoods. This Is a Mega Resort, not a residential neighborhood, This type of development Is completely not compatible with any of the surrounding neighborhoods for miles in every direction. City Planners and City Counsel Members, ask yourself, would you want to live next door to a Water Sports-Themed Amusement Park with 80 foot high stadium lighting, noise from concert venues, BMX motor bike racing, and wave machines and traffic 24/7? https://outlook.live.com/mail/0/inbox/id/AQMkADAwATZiZmYAZC050DZiLT15YzQtMDACLTAwCgBGAAAD5mvek2LMlkeel7CDcsJxlgcAacO51 UC... 1/2 3/15/2021 Mail - billie costello - Outlook The approval of the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Perk Amusement Park style Resort will permanently cause the irreplaceable loss of the peaceful, quiet, serene atmosphere that this part of La Quinta is renowned for. Allowing this extremely large Tourist/Commercial Resort into our quiet low- density residential, golf -oriented neighborhoods, will negatively affect every Homeowner for miles around. There will be no coming back. The value of our homes and the quality of life of living and being In the "Quite Zone" of Le Quints will be forever degraded. I urge the City of La Quinta NOT to change the zoning from the current designation Low -Density Residential w/ 18-hole golfcourse to TOURIST/COMMERCIAL , I urge you not to allow Short Term Vacation Rentals (STVR) and the problems that accompany there. This proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort Is exactly the WRONG type of develop for this location. You are literally planning to drop a tourist amusement park resort in the middle of a quiet residential zone. Please do not allow this project to move forward, Sincerely, https://outlook.live. com/mail/0/i nbox/id/AQMkADAwATZiZmYAZC050DZiLT15YzQtM DACLTAwCg BGAAAD5mvek2LM I keel7CDcsJxlgcAacO5l6(MU C. 2/2 Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 14:16:09 Pacific Standard Time Subject: COMMERCIAL DESIGATION Date: Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 1:49:30 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Patrick Courtney To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov This TOURIST/COMMERCIAL designation in south La Quinta is NOT APPROPRIATE in this location made-up of retirees who selected this area for quiet seclusion and away from commercial areas. This zoned area was your promise to homeowners regarding this lifestyle and not what you propose to change. This would best be located in another area and would be a grave strain on La Quinta resources. TRILOGY DOESN'T WANT THIS POPULATION IN AN OVER 55 designated area. Patrick & Pamela Courtney 949-854-693 patcourt@gmail.com 454Page 1 of 1 Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 13:42:11 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Proposed Development at Coral Mountain Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 12:56:16 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Kristina Davis To: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov My husband and I have been residents of PGA West for 20 years. Most of our neighbors are retirees (or soon to be) who moved to this area for its peace and quiet after living their lives in a "rat race" in some other part of the country. Now you want to visit the "rat race" upon us in the form of noise pollution, horrendous traffic, and major depletion of our water supply. This is a violation of the worst kind. Kristina Davis 455Page 1 of 1 Monday, March 15, 2021 at 09:20:42 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Park Date: Monday, March 15, 2021 at 8:38:38 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Anast Demitt To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste I am writing today as an owner of Trilogy La Quinta to voice my opposition to the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort development. I am a civil engineer and have been in practice for 43 years. From a municipal engineering perspective, this project is exactly the wrong type of development at the proposed location insofar as existing infrastructure (roads, sewers, water supply, traffic patterns, etc)i and residential development are concerned. For the sake of brevity, following is a summary of the reasons for my objection to the proposed development. • This will be a private facility not open to anyone other than hotel guests. What benefit is there for the neighbouring communities and their peaceful enjoyment of their homes? • The noise from similar parks has been measured at 85dB. This level of noise 365 days per year is unacceptable in a historically residential portion of La Quinta. • The proposed development will damage historical geological and historical features such as the fish traps and ancient Lake Cahuilla. • The resort will accommodate 4800 guests per day. This will have an unreasonable adverse affect on roadways, traffic and the peaceful enjoyment of our residential communities. • Water is a scarce commodity in the Coachella Valley. This facility will consume vast amounts of water and generate wastewater in volumes beyond current treatment facility capacity. • The multi storey hotels proposed for the site are much taller than all other buildings in La Quinta. • The facility with its loudspeakers and lighting towers will be akin to having the Indian Wells Tennis Gardens in the midst of a large number of residential communities. • The facility will operate until 10PM resulting in noise and light pollution in an otherwise quiet and peaceful neighborhood setting. • This type of development is better suited adjacent to major roads such as the 110 where existing traffic infrastructure is capable of handling the expect traffic volumes. The current designation for the land parcel is residential use. All home owners in adjacent communities purchased their homes with that understanding. It is unacceptable that a large and disruptive commercial development be built within a long accepted residential portion of La Quinta. Thank you for your consideration of my concerns. Anast Demitt 60149 Honeysuckle Street La Quinta, CA, 92253 Anast Demitt, P.Eng., FEC, FGC (Hon) Anast Demitt Consulting Engineering Ltd. 28 Mahogany Cape SE Calgary, AB 45EPage 1 of 2 T3M 2S4 Phone : 403-870-2109 The information in this e-mail is intended to be confidential and for the use of only the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are notified that retention, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail reply. Thank you. 457Page 2 of 2 Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 13:09:55 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave Park Date: Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 1:01:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Janet DiPrinzio To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: jdiprinzio53@gmail.com, Philip B. To Whom it may Concern: I am very concerned about the proposal to have a Wave Park built in La Quinta. My concerns are based on potential daily noise impact, increased traffic and transient population. Currently we have StageCoach and Coachella Festive which does all of these on a seasonal basis. In addition, the Pandemic hit the hospitality sector extremely hard, which the proposed Wave Park is part of that sector. With SilverRock being built and the Wave Park, I think that La Quinta is placing quite a bit of potential revenue in jeopardy, as Pandemic's maybe come the norm of our lives. During the Pandemic there was an increase of people who wanted to come here to wait out the Pandemic. There was an increase in home sales, and now builders are back to "building". I believe that the original plan of homes and a golf course with bring a stable flow of income to La Quinta due to property taxes on new properties, and an increase of local residents spending $$ within La Quinta and surrounding areas. If you wish to contact me, you can reach me at (858) 945-2376 or (760) 771-6137 Sincerely, Janet Di Prinzio 57824 Salida del Sol La Quinta, CA. 92253 45EPage 1 of 1 Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 11:35:46 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Fwd: Slater Project.. Date: Friday, March 26, 2021 at 9:23:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Dina To: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaCa.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Dina <dspolo@aol.com> To: ConsultingPlanner@laquinta.gov <ConsultingPlanner@laquinta.gov> Sent: Fri, Mar 26, 2021 9:18 pm Subject: Slater Project.. I am mostly excited about this project but feel the noise and traffic issues require that it not be so close to a mountain (sound wise) and across or near to The Quarry, Andaluscia and Trilogy. Plenty of Desert land away from Developments. ie Thermal Beach Club 459�age 1 of 1 Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 09:41:54 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Surf park Date: Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 7:59:42 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Dennis S. Duffy To: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov I am in opposition to the proposed surf park in LQ. Sent from my Whone 46(Page 1 of 1 Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 10:49:48 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Project Date: Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 10:47:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: CAROLYN EADON To: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov Good Afternoon, I wish to be added as a person of interest for the Coral Mountain Resort Development. I have many concerns about whether this project is appropriate to be placed in an area of existing residential communities. My issues are not with the development of single family homes proposed for the property that are in keeping with the current neighborhoods but with the placement of a commercial enterprise that with generate noise,lighting issues, and increased traffic that are NOT in keeping with the established area surrounding this property. We have as residents of the area received a letter from the developer outlining their understanding of the process and the timeline for concerned citizens to have input into the process. I would appreciate receiving from the City of La Quinta an outline of the process and dates for input as required by code of the City. In conclusion, I also request to be included in the March 30 virtual meeting that the city is hosting on the EIR scope. After that presentation I reserve the right to add any additional comments or concerns regarding the proposed Coral Mountain Resort to be included in the official record. Enclosed is my contact information for addition to the public record as a person of interest on the proposed Coral Mountain Resort Project by Meriwether Companies in the City of La Quinta, California. Thank you, Carolyn Eadon 58162 Aracena La Quinta, Ca 92253 ceadon@mac.com 206-909-8357 Sent from my iPad 46'Page 1 of 1 Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 17:22:41 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Surf Park Development at Coral Mountain Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 5:17:39 PM Pacific Standard Time From: L E To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov La Quinta City Planning, am emailing you with my numerous concerns over the potential Coral Mountain Surf Park project. moved to La Quinta three years ago after an extensive research to find a quiet, peaceful and safe location to live full time. My search ended when I decided the City of La Quinta had everything I was seeking, mainly quiet and a safe secure neighborhood. I researched crime stats since I am a female that lives alone and feel that safety is paramount. There is almost zero crime out here. There are not any commercial businesses close by which is why we all moved here. The closer to commercial entities crimes, by evidence of the crime stats, go up. My residence is a one -minute walk to the beautiful, peaceful and quiet Coral Mountain area. You can hear animals, including coyotes howl at night. It is a wonderful habitat for wildlife, reptiles and many bird species. Here are some of my concerns: The magnitude of this project is not conducive to this area at all. Noise and dirt from construction and according to the developer potentially for the next 10 - 20 years. Noise pollution from the many proposed activities that are planned there, including loud speakers for announcements, etc. This is inconceivable to even think about. Light pollution. This is a huge concern of our entire neighborhood and mine. La Quinta does not have any street lights here (which I love) due to light pollution. You can see so many stars in our night sky due to zero lights at that corner and surrounding areas. Traffic. Looking at the projections traffic lights would need to be installed adding to pollution and noise during construction and once the park is complete. am involved with this wonderful city through CERT and other volunteer opportunities that serve the citizens of La Quinta. I want to stay forever so please consider all the ramifications this will have to all the people and neighborhoods here. By the way I am an ex -surfer and just recently gave away my skateboard. I like the concept but this is not even close to the area where it should be considered. There are so many areas south and west of here that would not affect any residential areas and would be a much better fit for all. I understand the need for tax revenue but there are other locations that would not impact residential neighborhoods. Thank you for your time. Best, Elizabeth Ervin 80872 Calle Azul La Quinta, CA 92253 949. 280-7695 46Tage 1 of 2 Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 13:35:18 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Mega -Resort development at Coral Mountain Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 12:53:46 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Mark Farley To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Hello — I am writing to oppose the development of the mega resort at Coral Mountain. I just bought a house in the lovely, quiet community of Trilogy La Quinta. I am appalled to think that a massive resort may be built next door to our development. This mega resort is antithetical to the surrounding area. Many of us bought here to get away from the noise, congestion and dirty air of Los Angeles and San Diego. Please do not approve such a project. You will be destroying the very reason for living in the desert in the first place. If such a place is needed, please relocate some distance from residential communities. Thank you, Mark Farley 61403 Topaz Dr La Quinta, CA 92253 858-405-5174 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 46Yage 1 of 1 Monday, March 15, 2021 at 12:42:57 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: To: Nicole Sauviat Criste/ Re: Coral Mountain project zoning and plans Date: Monday, March 15, 2021 at 11:57:59 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Bobbie Fleury To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov, Linda Evans, rradi@laquintaca.gov, kfitzpatrick@laquintaca.gov, jpena@laquintaca.gov, ssanchez@laquintaca.gov >> Hello Nicole - >> I'm a 17 year resident of Trilogy La Quinta. You might say that being >> all the way out here is a two-edged sword - yes, we have >> some distance to go for our shopping, but we have peace, quiet, and >> beautiful DARK, starry, night skies. >> I fear that some of this will be unalterably changed forever if the >> zoning for the Coral Mt. project is changed to "Tourist/Commercial." >> That's opening a dangerous Pandora's box that could lead to our >> corner of the world becoming the "thrill ride" capital of the east >> valley. >> Of particular concern is the land earmarked for homes. What's to >> prevent the developer from reducing the number they plan to build, and >> selling off some of those parcels for some other "Tourist/Commercial" >> venture? >> With music on all day and evening; stadium -style light towers, a BMX >> pump track; and special televised events bringing in large crowds, >> the impact on our environment could be significant. Adding to that is >> Meriwether's plan for 10+ years of construction which will affect our >> streets >> due to truck traffic; spew dust into the air; and generally disrupt >> the quality of life we enoy out here, not only for us at Trilogy, but >> for The Quarry, Andalusia, >> parts of PGA West, Santerra, etc., which are all single family, >> single story, residences. >> This wave park and extreme sports complex really should be on a >> different parcel of land where it isn't surrounded by homes. >> Therefore, I respectfully request that the zoning change be denied. >> Thank you for your attention to my letter. >> Regards, >> Bobbie Fleury >> 81586 Desert Willow Dr. >> 760-777-7526 464Page 1 of 2 Friday, April 2, 2021 at 09:38:12 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Attn: Nicole//Re: Coral Mt. Resort water usage Date: Friday, April 2, 2021 at 8:42:40 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Bobbie Fleury To: Bobbie Fleury Good Morning Nicole, Mayor Evans, and Council Members Fitzpatrick, Pena, Sanchez, and Radi - My letters of opposition to the Coral Mt. Wave Park Resort have been on file with the city since 2019 when the story first appeared in the Desert Sun. My other emails addressed various aspects of the environment that will be negatively impacted by this project. But today's email will address the most precious commodity we have in the desert - WATER. The quote below is from Thursday's Desert Sun. Our state is headed for another drought. That means potential water restrictions on all of us like we had in 2015/2016 when, among other measures, city fountains were drained and lawn watering was restricted. At that time, the City Council proposed water reduction strategies including the following: "the raising of the city's development standards to restrict use of future development." So how irresponsible would it be to allow for this wave pool to suck millions of gallons of water from our underground resources, and watch it evaporate in the dry desert air as the wave curls overhead? And what happens if it's constructed and can't be filled or used due to state water limitations? Then we have a half mile long empty ditch! At Tuesday's Scoping Meeting, an article by Surfrider Inertia was read stating that the European Surf League does not support wave pools due to their lasting effect on the environmental footprint of our planet earth, and that they represent irresponsible water consumption. Since Meriwether Corp. doesn't seem to have a conscience about this, it behooves the rest of us to take a stand on preserving our natural resource. A hotel with sports amenities that might even include a sandy beach by the pool, a la the Renaissance Esmerelda in Indian Wells, doesn't represent the same magnitude of environmental disruption as this proposed wave pool. Therefore, in closing, I respectfully ask you to consider this most important issue and deny a permit for the pool. Thank you - Bobbie Fleury 81586 Desert Willow Dr. On tap in Calif.: Another drought 465Page 1 of 2 ASSOCIATED PRESS The state appears in the midst of another drought only a few years after a punishing 5-year dry spell dried up rural wells, killed endangered salmon, idled farm fields and helped fuel the most deadly and destructive wildfires in modern state history. "We're looking at the second dry year in a row. In California that pretty much means we have a drought," said Jay Lund, a civil and environmental engineering professor at the University of California, Davis. In fact, the entire West is gripped in what scientists consider a "megadrought" that started in 1999 and has been interrupted by only occasional years with above -average precipitation. In California, the heaviest rain and snow comes in the winter months, but not this year — about 90% of the state already is experiencing drought conditions, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor. 46EPage 2 of 2 Monday, March 22, 2021 at 15:31:32 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave Park Development at Coral Mountain Date: Monday, March 22, 2021 at 3:15:24 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Marshall Forster To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Sherry Forster Attn: Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner City of La Quinta, CA Re: Coral Mountain Resort Amendment V Dear Ms. Criste, My name is Marshall Forster and I am a home owner at Andalusia Country Club and have been for 7 years. My wife Sherry and I purchased in 2013 and spent most weekends here while I was still working and living in LA. I retired in 2017 and have been living here full time since then. The attraction of Andalusia has always been its "off the beaten track'' location, the quiet surroundings and peaceful ambience, not to mention the friendly people who live here. Our objective for leaving LA was to get away from the traffic, noise, crime and homelessness. Quite frankly, we had enough. Andalusia was exactly what we were looking for as it met all of those objectives. We were told that the lot adjacent would eventually be an extension of Andalusia. While I understand that there are never any guarantees, we would never have moved here knowing that a Wave Park was a consideration. We are not fans of this development. Initially, we were told that it would be a high end exclusive community. Recently we learned that the hotel will be four floors instead of two, the addition of a Skate Board Park, Rock Climbing, several Surfing competitions throughout the year and 80' foot light towers. In addition, we are concerned about traffic and noise.. The City has prudently required an Environmental Impact Report be prepared in compliance with CEQA guidelines. I respectfully request that the public comment period for this development be extended to at least 30 days from receipt and distribution of the EIR so everyone can assess the impact this project will have on all our dear friends and neighbors at Andalusia and surrounding communities. Thank you for your consideration. Kind Regards, 46 r-Page 1 of 2 Marshall & Sherry Forster 81679 Andalusia La Quinta, CA 92253 msforster@yahoo.com cell 818-371-5551 46EPage 2 of 2 Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 16:04:26 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave Park Development at Coral Mountain Date: Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 2:25:59 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Randy Gates To: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Ms. Criste, My name is Randy Gates and I am a home owner at Andalusia Country Club and have been for 3 years. Prior to moving to Andalusia I was a homeowner at La Quinta Country Club for 3 years, which is located on the corners of Washington and Eisenhower. My Wife Amy and I chose to move to Andalusia from La Quinta Country Club quite frankly because the noise from the traffic was non-stop and unbearable. Constant cars and motorcycles racing, car crashes, ambulance and police sirens blaring nearly every day. The attraction to Andalusia was clear to us. A peaceful and quiet community where we can live and play golf without all the noise pollution, light pollution, traffic and crime. The fact that Andalusia is a 15-20 minute drive to get to town for shopping and restraunts doesn't bother us at all, in fact its a bonus. When we purchased our home at Andalusia, we were told that more homes and a second golf course was planned right where the now proposed Wave Park is supposed to be going. Thats when the Drummond family owned the property. Then the property was sold to the Sunrise Company, and all of a sudden things changed. The Sunrise Company sold the portion of the property off that was to be a development into a similar desert homes and a second golf course, and now we end up with this modern Disneyland Wave Park right in our backyard. Please understand I was a developer for over 40 years, so I am not against development. But we are not in support of this proposed Wave Park as it is planned now. First off, the Wave Park sits in elevation some 20' higher than the Andalusia property. Then they are proposing 80' tall light standards which means the lights will be a total of 100' above my property and completely wreck my view of the Coral Mountains. I want to be very clear on this issue, I do not want any nighttime activities at the Wave Park if it is approved by the city. Once the sun goes down, we need to maintain a quiet and peaceful atmosphere at all times. We are not in favor of any parties, special events as they will only bring noise, and crime to our neighborhood. We also have now been told that there will be loud speakers, and short term rentals too. This is also a bad idea. Yesterday the residence of Andalusia received an email letter from the developer stating that the proposed Water Park would "Benefit the surrounding community". We respectfully disagree. Further, the letter states "the project will complement the area immediate area around their property", and "we cannot negatively impact neighboring communities". Seriously, I cannot think of any good that can come from a 3 or 4 story hotel, short term rentals, loud speakers, 100' tall lights and having big parties, huge "Coachella type" events and tons of new traffic problems. We appreciate the opportunity to provide initial feedback on the Wave Park Project in advance of the EIR. We hope and pray that the city will listen to all the concerns of the Andalusia residence and I for one sincerely hope that the city of La Quinta not approve there entire project as its been submitted. This is very important to me and my family, as we moved to Andalusia for peace and quiet and we hope the city of La Quinta will protect the rights of the residences that live here. Thank you for your consideration. Kind Regards, Randy & Amy Gates 46SPage 1 of 2 59355 Seville La Quinta, CA 92253 rfgates@me.com 714 904-8910 47(Page 2 of 2 Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 09:35:08 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Proposed zone change opposed Date: Friday, March 19, 2021 at 6:39:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: cathy To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov I am an owner in Andelucia and very disturbed by the proposed zoning change adjacent to our property. I think it will be loud and really unfortunate for La Quinta and the surrounding area. The traffic from the large events and the noise from the wave machine it not why I chose to live here. I want the night sky dark and quiet and hope that the City will respect the wishes of it's residents and impose a 8 pm quiet time. This zoning change should not happen in our area. Thank you for your help and understanding. Cathy Giles Peter Hoedemaker Lot 87 Ronda St 47'Page 1 of 1 Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 08:46:45 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Fight Against Coral Mountain Resort Date: Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 7:55:28 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Connie Glavin To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov I would like to give you a few reasons why not to put this sports center at the base of coral mountains and by the only entrance to the Quarry. We worked years and saved to purchase our retirement home away from crowds noise and traffic. We purchased this home in 2013 And the peaceful nights where you can sit outside and see the stars clearly since no street lights. Also the wildlife, big horn sheep, coyotes and the roadrunners. We like to hike and bike. With the added traffic with this development will not be safe to head out the gate at the Quarry and ride bike around down 58 to Madison and head into old town La Quinta. The added traffic and people will add noise and chaos, which is something we considered buying out here peaceful and not having to deal with traffic to go to the grocery store or anywhere here in our beautiful valley. This complex will destroy what we so much enjoy. We worked hard and saved to be able to purchase and live our retirement life in peace and quite, and enjoy the wildlife. This will be destroyed and is not acceptable. We will fight against the commercialization of our neighborhood. Dan and Connie Glavin 79460 Tom Fazio Lane North La Quinta, CA 92253 760-619-3468 Sent from my iPad 47Tage 1 of 1 Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 07:55:32 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Re: propoesed surf park next to Trilogy Date: Monday, March 8, 2021 at 9:02:33 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Lew Gleason To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov From Email starting with Thank you for taking my Emai.Lewis Gleason 61325 livingstone drive La Quinta Cal. 92253 On Mon, Mar 8, 2021 at 8:53 PM Lew Gleason <lewatduke@gmail.com> wrote: > Thank you for taking my Email. I am as is my family 100% against this > project. The traffic traffic traffic and noise will be awful to those > of us who live up on 60th av and Madison. the area is zoned > residential not commercial. We moved here for retirement and peace and > quiet . There is absolutely no upside for the thousands of residents > who live in the area of this project. Why would our elected officials > want to upset our choice to where we want to spend the rest of our > days? Its not a good fit for this area. Im not against it just not > right next door to where I live. The sound of waves and generators > running with loud music and Lights in the sky when the sun goes down > along with 5000 new residents plus the number of new residents that > silver rock will bring. Come on. Would any of the council want this in > their back yard??? Yes the money for the city would be nice but not at > the expense of all of us who already live here. Because i worked and > drove in the LA traffic for 35 years and the pressure from noise and > the hustle and bussel of the city made me BI Polar in my older years. > Im on 5 different medications for my mental illness. The peace and > quiet here lets me live a pretty normal life. Without it we will be > forced to move. Its just not fair. Thank You 47yage 1 of 1 Friday, April 2, 2021 at 14:49:47 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Water table at proposed wave park Date: Friday, April 2, 2021 at 2:01:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Lew Gleason To: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov Hello Nicole. My name is Lewis Gleason and I live at 61325 Living Stone Dr, La Quinta, CA 92253. 1 am in opposition to the wave park. So several years ago my company did all the underground plumbing at the new thermal sheriffs station on airport rd in thermal. It is appropriately 8 miles from where the new proposed wave park would located. To bring your attention the contract who installed the sewer and storm drain came in contact with major ground water at 15 ft below finish grade. This's caused major issues while trying to install the sewer main lines. Pumps pumps and more pumps were needed to try and elevate the thousands of gallons of water entering the excavation. It's dangerous work for sure. Do to the high water table more than 90 concrete piles were used along with massive concrete and rebar grade beams to create a base on which the structure could sit on. The piles were 60 long. The engineers were very concerned that when the water tables would rise they could liquify the soil under the buildings , hence the reason for building the structures on stilts and or concrete piles. Has there been a study on the depth of the water table on the proposed WP site ? Could the wave pools water contaminate our water table and Aqua -fir and drinking water ? I think a lot of research needs to go into these issues before we even get started. Can't imagine what would happen if possible drinking water contamination for the proposed WP got out into the public. I would appreciate any feed back from you Nicole regarding these issues. Have a wonderful Easter. Lewis Gleason 474Page 1 of 1 Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 13:56:52 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Surf park Date: Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 1:22:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Denise To: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov Good morning I am contacting you regarding the upcoming surf park development in the city of La Quinta. I am a 11 year full-time resident and one of the major reasons I moved into the area is because of its low density and quiet lifestyle. I believe that the additional light and noise created by a development of this magnitude would negatively impact the quality of my life. It would also I believe negative negatively impact the value of my home. The light pollution and noise alone is a very concerning factor. I was under the understanding that a multi use zoning would be something more in the lines of what PGA West offers. Rentals golf restaurants a few retail. I was not aware that the surf park was going to impact my life so significantly as well as those around it. I expect to be very active in my opposition to this planned development. I feel that giving free reign to the developers would be detrimental to all of us in the vicinity. Please notify me of upcoming meetings and discussions. Thanks Denise Guajardo 206-769-3616 Sent from my iPhone 475Page 1 of 1 Monday, March 8, 2021 at 17:12:32 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain and Surf Park Development project Date: Monday, March 8, 2021 at 4:07:34 PM Pacific Standard Time From: CHRIS HAGEN To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Hi Nicole, My name is Christine Hagen. I am a resident of Trilogy La Quinta. I have been following the proposed Coral Mountain project and while initially not thrilled about the project I was resigned to the or moving forward. However, just recently I have received information that leads me to believe information regarding impact of this project moving forward was misrepresented. I moved to Trilogy to get away from all the in town traffic and as a permanent retirement home. From what I can gather the zoning of the area will be changed to tourism/commercial. I don't believe this is a good move for the quality of the area. This project and potential future projects will bring so much traffic noise pollution and crime. It will change the landscape of the entire area. We already have Coachella and Stagecoach events which turn the town upside down for a few days. The surf/music events will ruin our area. I don't mind Coachella and Stagecoach knowing it brings revenue to the city and small businesses. However, the so called boutique hotel and surf park will change the entire peaceful environment for many residents in Trilogy, Andalusia and the Quarry. I would prefer the zoning not change and this open space be for residential. I know in the next few years many baby boomers will be moving into LQ. La Quinta is known as the "gem" of the desert for a reason. Please Please don't let the Meriwether Company destroy this beautiful part of town. (I am a full time resident). Thank you. Sincerely, Christine Hagen (714) 309-5092. Sent from my iPhone 47EPage 1 of 1 Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 10:50:29 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: proposed wave park Date: Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 9:57:39 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Reed Harman To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Hello" Consulting Planner" - My name is Reed Harman. I have had a home in La Quinta for 23 years and for the past 15 years have lived at 79-121 Tom Fazio lane South at The Quarry. I am not in favor of the proposed wave park. The project proposed by Meriweather is not a residential development, but rather it is an AMUSEMENT PARK with the attendant noise and traffic and a nonconforming us in its location. While I am gratified that an updated EIS is now required, I worry that the La Quinta City Council is mesmerized by the prospect of additional bed tax revenue and is willing to sacrifice our neighborhood in the hope for those receipts. The greater those those receipts, the worse this project will be for those living nearby. I have little doubt that the project will be constructed in a first class fashion and have equally little doubt that it will be successful. I feel strongly that La Quinta should make every effort to relocate the project to property between 52nd and 54th st west of Jefferson where it would be proximate to the Silver Rock golf course and the long planned hotel/commercial development nearby. In addition, "old" La Quinta is a largely failed retail area that is in desperate need of additional retail traffic and that area would greatly benefit as well. This should be no secret to responsible city planners. I worry that communications like this one and like " whistling in the wind", but whistle I must. Thank you for your consideration, Reed Harman 477Page 1 of 1 Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 09:33:47 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain objections Date: Friday, March 19, 2021 at 7:42:17 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Monica Harrington To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov I am in the escrow process of buying a home in Andalusia and, because of the amended development plan from Coral Mountain, will most likely back out, forfeiting tens of thousands of dollars. This loss in property value represents a real and negative economic impact. I don't know anyone who desires a home in a low density desert environment who wants to live next to 80 foot light poles, loudspeakers announcing waves every six minutes, and a background hum of 75 decibels at all hours of the day. The plan now proposed bears almost no resemblance to the rosy PR drawings and low impact community plans presented early last year. You should start calling this project the NASCAR-style La Quinta Wave Resort, so people accurately understand the ongoing noise, lights, crowds, and other disruptions. I'm not optimistic about changing anyone's minds. I just think everyone needs to be honest that the character of La Quinta is being profoundly changed, and the beneficiaries are real estate developers, and not anyone who currently lives in the community. The actual lived experience on the Southwestern edges of La Quinta is being profoundly changed. Sincerely, Monica Harrington 206-399-9876 58117 Carmona Andalusia 47EPage 1 of 1 Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 09:12:30 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Fwd: Kelly Slater project that died Date: Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 5:57:49 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Monica Harrington To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Hi Ms. Christe, I submitted a letter to you earlier, but wanted to share two other items with you: 1. Regarding previous Slater wave project that didn't move forward httpL//LAavepoolmag.com/florida-wave-pool-curse/ 2. Item from Desert Sun regarding the consequences of some local failed development projects: https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/2021/03/19/paI m-spri ngs-ta ki ng-legal-action-aga i nst-four-stalled- hotel s/4766568001/ The gist of what I'm asking you to consider is the risk of moving forward on a project that raises so many environmental and aesthetic issues and that relies on unproven technology, backed up against the crown jewels of La Quinta - the gorgeous mountains that frame the Western mountain views of Coachella Valley. If the project stalls midstream, or the technology fails, the entire community will pay. I think the entire project needs to be re-examined, but if any part of it moves forward, it should only do so with a system of checks and balances to mitigate the potential consequential damage to the broader community. Examples of how you might mitigate involve providing clear environmental standards for each stage of the project before approving any subsequent stage. How much noise is the wave pool really going to create? What happens if the reverberations off the walls of Coral Mountain cause the noise to carry much further than anticipated? How do you protect the night sky with 80 foot light poles and what are likely to be jumbotron screens and loud broadcasting? Is this consistent with what city planners believe makes sense for a development at the very base of its fabled mountains? This mission statement of the Riverside planning department is to "to protect the health, safety and welfare of our residents and visitors through the equitable enforcement of building standards, which serve to safeguard our built environment, ensure sustainable facilities and enhance the quality of place for our community. I don't understand how the proposed project safeguards the built environment and enhances the quality of place for the community. do understand the challenges you face. At one time in my career, I spearheaded the community relations effort for a huge (several hundred million dollar project) that was built in downtown Seattle. Part of what we did was to hold regular public and publicized community meetings so that we and city planners could hear and understand neighbors' concerns. Here we have a process where the plans for this project have been deliberately opaque, presented through the filtered gauze of artist renderings that show low -scale buildings and a low key vibe. Nowhere in any of drawings or the brief text accompanying them (check the architect's website) is there any mention of the noisy, brightly lit atmosphere and four-story hotel the developers are actually planning. Sincerely, Monica Harrington 47�Page 1 of 2 Best, Monica Harrington 48(Page 2 of 2 Top 4 Florida wave pool projects that didn't work out 3/21/21, 9:18 AM ADVERTISMENT �Ft f WAVEPOOLM(O 0 SUBSCRIBE Sorcery: Florida wave pool curse fact or fiction? Written by Bryan Dickerson May 5, 2020 Sometimes America's can -do spirit and moxie just don't work out. Trending FloridaMan feats like tossing alligators through drive-thru windows or trying to shoot down hurricanes captivate us because FloridaMan tries and fails brilliantly. "A" for effort means a lot in The States even if it is a stupid idea in the first place. When the World Surf League sunk $6million into the purchase of what turned out to be swampland for the next Kelly Slater pool we chalked it off to bad luck. But then after some digging we soon learned https://wavepoolmag.com/florida-wave-pool-curse/?web=1&wdLOR=c3EEBBA7E-2A72-CB43-AF50-2F45944F5B84 481 Page 1 of 7 Top 4 Florida wave pool projects that didn't work out 3/21/21, 9.18 AM many other tales of wave pool failure in the Sunshine State. There's the one about Disney's 1972 machine that destroyed expensive beachfront, the building height war with Harry Potter that tanked the Sky Surfpark and the infamous 2008 Ron Jons wave pool that ate itself. So, suppose it didn't matter how much effort FloridaMan (and the rest of us) put into our respective escapades, the result would always be the same? Failure. Florida is part of the Bermuda Triangle after all. But today, without WWII fighter squadrons to feast on, maybe that mysterious vortex now makes people smoke bath salts and eat other people's faces. Harsh? Yes. But how else would you explain so much strange in such a small geographical area? These wave pools aimed high, and we salute them for that. They tried in true red, white and blue fashion but some mysterious power out there foiled their fruition. Yes. The Florida Curse. v will ■ ■�� _ �.. ..:.■..� .r.r' f"mow +firdoom Swamp Not a Great Place for Kelly Slater Wave Co The company announced plans for the Florida sister wave to the Surf Ranch in 2017. The West Palm Beach project would have facilitated a massive 16-acre surf lagoon surrounded by several buildings including a learning center, surf club and training hub. The application stated the project would have created more than 300 jobs and pumped $33 million into the economy. However, citing the high water table and a series of "unforeseen challenges" the WSL decided to tank the project. "The nature of this site, including the extremely high water table, exposed unforeseen challenges that made the decision around this unique project clear," the company said in a statement. "The WSL is disappointed to confirm our decision to cancel the development of the wave basin planned for West Palm Beach, Florida." https://wavepoolmag.com/florida-wave-pool-curse/?web=1&wdLOR=c3EEBBA7E-2A72-CB43-AF50-2F45944F5B84 Page 2 of 7 482 Top 4 Florida wave pool projects that didn't work out 3/21/21, 9:18 AM What those unforeseen challenges are can be any one of several things. As wave pool makers will tell you that building a wave pool is fraught with pitfalls (although they might not say this in front of investors). Of those, permitting seems to be the biggest. A Florida news station reported that homeowners in the area of Kelly's proposed wave pool, as well as the Sierra Club, raised concerns about water pollution, traffic and crowds when the plans were announced two years ago. Old School Disneyland Pool Destroys Shoreline In the early 1970s, Disney pumped huge resources into transforming the state of Florida into a theme park Mecca. In the process, Mickey and company created the Seven Seas Lagoon complete with a wave machine in the hopes of astounding visitors with live surfing demonstrations. The "surf generator" was anchored to one of the islands and sent surf across the lake to break along the far shore bathymetry. Consisting of eight hydraulic paddles, the machine worked great pumping out surf across the customized lagoon and onto a beach. But Disney didn't plan for the wave action eroding the expensive man-made beaches and clouding the clear water with brown muck. They did more testing, tried a few solutions but finally had to pull the plug on the wave pool. The lake remains surf -less to this day. But that can -do spirit and drive to create something to compete with Florida's famous beaches did lead to the creation of Typhoon Lagoon the surf spot that set the standard for wave pools in its day. https://wavepoolmag.com/florida-wave-pool-curse/?web=1&wdLOR=c3EEBBA7E-2A72-CB43-AF50-2F45944F5B84 Page 3 of 7 483 Top 4 Florida wave pool projects that didn't work out 3/21/21, 9:18 AM Ron Jon Surf Park Excites, Disappoints then Implodes Ron Jon Surf Shop would invest millions into a wave pool that basically self-destructed. The Ron Jon Surf Park was all set to become the world's first surf -specific wave pool at the close of 2008. The project included customizable bathymetry, so wave shape could change with the contour of the pool bottom at the push of a button. But it didn't go as planned. "Engineers failed to account for the tremendous pressure exerted downward when waves break," said wave pool developers Honokea. "Their prototype destroyed itself during testing. After the $9 million technology budget was exhausted, the project was halted indefinitely." Jimmy Wilson was much less diplomatic about the Ron Jons wave pool in an article he wrote for Stab saying that while the project had a solid financial foundation and unprecedented hype, the wave was ultimately disappointing. https://wavepoolmag.com/florida-wave-pool-curse/?web=1&wdLOR=c3EEBBA7E-2A72-CB43-AF50-2F45944F5B84 Page 4 of 7 484 Top 4 Florida wave pool projects that didn't work out 3/21/21, 9:18 AM Ron Jons wave pool prototype Photo by Stab/Jimmy Wilson "The moment we pulled up to the contraption disappointment set in," wrote Wilson. "I just knew it wasn't going to work, but I decided to retain a little hope until I watched the first waves pump out. Here's the play-by-play of what I witnessed... Fifty -kilo super-grom Evan Geiselman struggles to work the knee-high dribbler into the inside section and almost manages to get radical with a pathetic whitewater climb at the end, before dry-docking himself on a shitty metal grill." The Orlando Sentinel was kinder about the project than Stab. "Festival Bay Mall has given up on the original deal for the Ron Jon Surf park, a partially built International Drive attraction slowed by repeated delays in the four years since it was announced," the Sentinel reported. "Also, Cocoa -based Ron Jon Surf Shop has pulled its name from the project, and the attraction's developers say they need more cash before they can continue." %IF The artist renderings of the Sky SurfPark which hoped to have two American Wave Machines devices. https://wavepoolmag.com/florida-wave-pool-curse/?web=1&wdLOR=c3EEBBA7E-2A72-CB43-AF50-2F45944F5B84 Page 5 of 7 485 Top 4 Florida wave pool projects that didn't work out 3/21/21, 9.18 AM Harry Potter Uses Dirty Magic to Chop Sky Surf Park Imagine surfing a wave -like Waco's atop a 10-story building. Sky Surf Park was an add -on to the monstrous Skyplex development in Orlando before Universal Studios speared approval. The project began in 2012 and secured funding for a 10-story high entertainment/retail complex complete with a 350-room hotel and the world's tallest roller coaster. There were two American Wave Machines surf devices planned, a SurfStream standing wave device and a PerfectSwell design. Skyplex seemed a good fit given Orlando's theme -park draw to tourists both domestic and international. But one report claimed the top suits at Universal took issue with the development's height. Once completed, the wave pool at Skyyplex would (allegedly) ruin the view from The Wizarding World of Harry Potterjust down the road. Universal battled the project in typical deep -pockets methodology by funding a concerned citizens group called Save Our Orange County. "This project will result in noise and light pollution, as well as more traffic at the heavily congested intersection of Sand Lake Road and International Drive," the group stated. "Standing at 700 feet, nearly 50%tallerthan any structure in the county, this enormous proposed `Skyplex' tower will be seen for 30 miles." Skyplex responded to the group by calling Universal a bully and taking the unusual step of requesting that all parties "play nice." But Harry Potter's tactic worked. Three years ago construction was put on hold pending the proper permits. Then, in January of 2019, it was decided the whole project would be shrunk down to reduce costs and land footprint. There have been no further updates from developers and there is no website for the project. Their last Facebook (51K followers) post was December 2017 with their Twitter (2.1K followers) feed dying two years earlier. Will we see a wave at Skyplex in Orlando? We hope the Florida Curse lifts soon and we call all enjoy some new surf spots beyond Typhoon Lagoon. In the meantime, Wavegarden has two Florida projects on their Wavegardens-Around-the-World-map. With the proper permits, enough elevation and some alligator fencing, the company could be the first to break the Florida curse. Tags: florida, kelly slater Florida, paiynesian lagoon, Lon jons surf park, aky surfpark https://wavepoolmag.com/florida-wave-pool-curse/?web=1&wdLOR=c3EEBBA7E-2A72-CB43-AF50-2F45944F5B84 Page 6 of 7 486 Top 4 Florida wave pool projects that didn't work out 3/21/21, 9:18 AM Related Coverage • Swiss wave pool Alaia Bay fires up the machine • Wanna be a wave pool photographer? Here's a peek inside the life • The Wave in Virginia Beach moves closer to Cove -land • Guest Blog: Pneumatic wave pool technology crash course « PREV 019,11FiMI ADVERTISMENT Sign up NEXT f O A We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your Cookie settings ACCEPT preferences and repeat visits. By clicking "Accept", you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. https://wavepoolmag.com/florida-wave-pool-curse/?web=1&wdLOR=c3EEBBA7E-2A72-CB43-AF50-2F45944F5B84 Page 7 of 7 487 Palm Springs taking action vs. Andaz, Dream, Orchid Tree, TOVA hotels https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/2021/03/19/palm-springs-taking-... Desert Sun. NEWS Palm Springs says it will take legal action to force 4 stalled hotels to finish development Erin Rode Palm Springs Desert Sun Published 10:03 a.m. PT Mar. 19, 2021 I Updated 2:27 p.m. PT Mar. 19, 2021 The city of Palm Springs is moving forward with legal action against four stalled hotels in an attempt to force the hotel owners to complete development on the projects. The Palm Springs City Council authorized the City Attorney's Office to proceed with legal action against the owners of four hotels: the Andaz Hotel on Palm Canyon Drive, the Dream Hotel on Amado Road, the Orchid Tree on Belardo Road and the TOVA on North Palm Canyon Drive. More: What's up with all the hotel delays in Palm Springs? Mayor Geoff Kors gives updates The city called the stalled properties "a nuisance to their neighborhoods and to the community at large" in a press release Thursday. The City Attorney's Office is seeking a court -ordered receiver for the properties, who would then be charged in court to complete the hotels or demolish them. If this happens, the owners of the property would still own their properties and the cost of completing or demolishing the properties would be paid by the property owners. "The City of Palm Springs is always willing to work with our property owners. But, at some point, if those property owners do not do what is right for their neighbors and the rest of the City, we are forced to use whatever legal tools are available to us, in order to protect our residents, businesses and visitors," Mayor Christy Holstege said in the press release. City Manager David Ready told The Desert Sun that the legal action represents a "parallel track" in the city's strategy to get the hotels completed. 488 1 of 4 3/21/21, 9:19 AM Palm Springs taking action vs. Andaz, Dream, Orchid Tree, TOVA hotels https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/2021/03/19/palm-springs-taking-... "We certainly invite the owners and developers to proceed as fast as they can, however at the same time we are moving forward with the legal process, and that will take some time. For example, a year from now, when we're down the road on both of these tracks, if the developer has actually performed or convinced the City Council and community that they can proceed, the city can always pull back from the legal proceeding. But if they have not demonstrated that, we can proceed and the court will hopefully go forward with the receivership," Ready said. How we got here: The Andaz Located at the corner of Alejo Road and North Palm Canyon Drive, the Andaz has been in the works for years, and legal issues have led to multiple delays. Developer Lawrence Rael purchased the 4.1-acre site in 2005 at the height of the market. The initial concept was to develop condos. But the Great Recession put a stop to those plans. In March 2015, city officials signed off on the plans to put up a hotel. The 150-room hotel under Hyatt's higher -end Andaz flag was to be outfitted with suites, a spa, on -site fitness classes, a lounge and an Argentinian seafood restaurant. The ground floor was to encompass approximately 30,000 square feet of retail space. The city incentivized the Andaz with a $2 million payment to be made after the competition of about 130 free public parking spaces at the site. But that money will be paid when the project is completed and the city actually gets the spots, Ready has said. Legal battles and disputes among the general contractor and subcontractors have caused problems and delays, as The Desert Sun reported in November 2019. In December 2019, Palm Springs Mayor Geoff Kors said: Rael "has told us and repeated today that they'll be starting in January full steam ahead." In May 2020, Hall Structured Finance, a private construction lender, acquired a controlling interest in the property and assumed responsibility for completing the hotel. At the time, the Palm Springs City Council gave Hall a six-month extension on a construction deadline to possibly catch up on the project. Donald Braun, president of Hall Group, which is affiliated with the project, said at the time that while the company can't give the city a completion date it aims to get the project restarted. 489 2 of 4 3/21/21, 9:19 AM Palm Springs taking action vs. Andaz, Dream, Orchid Tree, TOVA hotels https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/2021/03/19/palm-springs-taking-... "It will be in our plans to move this forward, to get it ready for construction," he said. "We own a half -built hotel, which isn't exactly a very good financial investment at the moment, so we're going to need to figure out a way to move it forward." Dream Hotel At the November 2017 groundbreaking for the Dream Hotel, developer Lauri Kibby stood in front of a flower wall with the hotel's name spelled out with white roses and told city leaders that the project would be completed in two years. Rumors began swirling in fall 2019 about whether the project was still underway because Dream -branded fencing was switched out to brown construction fencing. Kors addressed that speculation at a December 2019 City Council meeting. "That was at our request, because that fencing was getting faded and ripped and we wanted it to look better," Kors said at the time. The project had a February 202o deadline to start building. The project's financing stalled due to liens on the property after the general contractor didn't pay the subcontractors, Kors said in December 2019. Orchid Tree Though the Orchid Tree was initially approved in 2016, it has faced several delays. Plans call for a restaurant, spa and 74 hotel rooms, according to the city. The City Council in November 2019 approved a timeline for the developer that would see the hotel open in early 2022. A year after giving developer Richard Weintraub an extension, the City Council voted unanimously in November to approve an updated agreement that included a performance schedule. A failure to adhere to the schedule could lead to the contract being terminated. The schedule was as follows: November 2020: Submit construction documents and apply for building permit. March 2021: Get city approval of construction documents. Obtain all building permits. June 2021: Begin constructing the hotel. December 2021: Have "substantially complete" construction. 490 3 of 4 3/21/21, 9:19 AM Palm Springs taking action vs. Andaz, Dream, Orchid Tree, TOVA hotels https://www.desertsun.com/story/news/2021/03/19/palm-springs-taking-... February 2022: Open the hotel. Tova The former Garden Vista Hotel at 1875 N. Palm Canyon Drive (also known as the Shiloh Inn) was slated to become the Tova Hotel and Beach Club, complete with a new Zoo -seat restaurant, fitness club and spa. A 2017 report in The Desert Sun, quoting developers, said all 124 guest rooms would be gutted and renovated, and new construction would involve building a 3,70o-square-foot building to house the fitness room, restrooms and storage. And another 15,20o-square-foot building would be constructed to house the restaurant. Kors said in November 2019 that the developers had planned to finance the project using an EB-5 visa program. But changes to that federal program undid their plans. Also known as the Immigrant Investor Program, the EB-5 program is an employment -based visa system that provides a way for foreign investors to obtain a green card if they put up money for job -creating projects in the United States. Previous reporting from Desert Sun reporter Melissa Daniels is included in this report. Erin Rode covers the western Coachella Valley cities of Palm Springs, Cathedral City and Desert Hot Springs. Reach her at erin.rode@desertsun.com. 491 4 of 4 3/21/21, 9:19 AM Monday, March 22, 2021 at 06:38:23 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Re: Coral Mountain objections Date: Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 4:44:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Monica Harrington To: Consulting Planner I would like to attend the Zoom meeting at 4:00 pm on March 30. In the event that I'm not able to attend for any reason, I hope you will consider the fact that the company behind this project announced it nationally as though it had been completely approved more than year ago. Here is some of the resulting press: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jimdobson/2020/02/26/kelly-slater-to-launch-surfing-resort-in-california-desert-near- coachel la/?sh=6de3951511e2 I'm not quite sure how the planning department holds a fair and objective public hearings processing if the public and other interested parties are under the assumption that permitting decisions for the project, as envisioned by its investment group, have already been determined. On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 9:34 AM Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Ms. Harrington, Thank you for your comments. They will be included in the EIR Notice of Preparation comments for the project. We have added a Scoping Meeting on March 30 at 4 PM. I have attached the Notice, which includes instructions on receiving the Zoom link if you would like to participate. If you would like to watch the meeting but not speak, it will also be livestreamed on the City's website. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Monica Harrington <monicah428@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 7:42 PM To: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain objections EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. 49Tage 1 of 2 I am in the escrow process of buying a home in Andalusia and, because of the amended development plan from Coral Mountain, will most likely back out, forfeiting tens of thousands of dollars. This loss in property value represents a real and negative economic impact. I don't know anyone who desires a home in a low density desert environment who wants to live next to 80 foot light poles, loudspeakers announcing waves every six minutes, and a background hum of 75 decibels at all hours of the day. The plan now proposed bears almost no resemblance to the rosy PR drawings and low impact community plans presented early last year. You should start calling this project the NASCAR-style La Quinta Wave Resort, so people accurately understand the ongoing noise, lights, crowds, and other disruptions. I'm not optimistic about changing anyone's minds. I just think everyone needs to be honest that the character of La Quinta is being profoundly changed, and the beneficiaries are real estate developers, and not anyone who currently lives in the community. The actual lived experience on the Southwestern edges of La Quinta is being profoundly changed. Sincerely, Monica Harrington 206-399-9876 58117 Carmona Andalusia 49Yage 2 of 2 Kelly Slater To Launch Surfing Resort In California Desert Near Coachella https://www.forbes.com/sites/J*imdobson/2020/02/26/kelly-slater-to-launc... EDITORS' PICK I FeL, it. 2020. 02.14pm EST 1 11,»4 ews Kelly Slater To Launch Surfing Resort In California Desert Near Coachella r �6 Jim Dobson Senior Contributor O Q+ Travel 4 S Searching the world for the most amazing People, Places and Things Kelly Slater Surf Resort in La Quinta CCY ARCHITECTS With the announcement today of the new Kelly Slater Surf Resort, there will now be over a dozen water parks and water resorts coming to the Southern California desert of Palm Springs, Coachella and La Quinta. c P 1 With an eye for younger adventure travelers and tourists, the goal is to provide iL Y 101 0 0 U Introducing the Forbes.com subscription. UnUn 494 1 of 4 3/22/21, 6:37 AM Kelly Slater To Launch Surfing Resort In California Desert Near Coachella https://www.forbes.com/sites/J*imdobson/2020/02/26/kelly-slater-to-launc... casual family outings. Kelly Slater Surf Ranch in Lemoore, CA, WORLD SURF LEAGUE VIA GETTY IMAGES Located in the shadow of Coral Mountain, the $too -million development will also offer up a 150-room luxury hotel, boo private residences from $1-$5 million each and all within 400 acres in the La Quinta area, adjacent to the popular Coachella Valley Music Festival area. The 18-million gallon surfing lagoon will be created by Kelly Slater Wave Co., utilizing his creation of the largest open -barrel, man-made waves. The developers Meriwether Cos. and Big Sky Wave also plan on integrating additional sporting attractions, including rock climbing, skateboarding, and extreme sports. The planned lagoons surrounding the property will also play N host to SUP lovers and the futuristic new hydrofoil boards. m c MORE FOR YOU 0 Biden's Fall Ranks Among The Top Air Force One Gaffes — But It's Not c Number One 0 Trump Hotels Were Quietly Removed From The Travel Industry's Most Important Luxury Network 495 2 of 4 3/22/21, 6:37 AM Kelly Slater To Launch Surfing Resort In California Desert Near Coachella https://www.forbes.com/sites/J*imdobson/2020/02/26/kelly-slater-to-launc... Are Covid `Resort Bubbles' The Next Step For Safe Travel? Kelly Slater at his Surf Ranch Pro in Lemoore, California. (Photo by Sean M. Haffey/Getty Images) GETTY IMAGES In addition to the 18-million-gallon surf basin, the features might include a network of ponds that hotel guests and residents could navigate on stand-up slow -moving paddle boards or decidedly faster electric hydrofoil boards that lift riders out of the water. I previously wrote about extensive water park developments in the adjacent areas to Coachella currently being built on the former Wet `n' Wild water park off of Gene Autry Trail, a project financially backed by pro surfers. And in Palm Springs, the Palm Springs Surf Club is among developers seeking out the millennial visitors to add more tourist dollars to desolate, underdeveloped c P areas. i 0 The new Thermal Beach Club project is being developed by WhiteStar o Development LLC and will tap into existing water rights. The development 0 will incorporate American Wave Machines PerfectSwell technology, which is also used at the 2-acre BSR Surf Resort in Texas. 496 3 of 4 3/22/21, 6:37 AM Kelly Slater To Launch Surfing Resort In California Desert Near Coachella https://www.forbes.com/sites/J*imdobson/2020/02/26/kelly-slater-to-launc... And nearby in Palm Desert, a $200 million surf resort recently was approved by the Palm Desert City Council, which will lead to the development of a project that includes a 5.5-acre wave lagoon, hotel, and residential villas at Desert Willow Golf Resort. Slater is confident about the new project and says, "We're excited to make another KSWaveCo design, and I'm personally excited to create a new wave that will be a stand- alone design that nowhere else in the world has. This can become the blueprint for new developments around waves and surf parks going forward and is in line with some of my original ideas from when we started this project." Forbes I Passport Get a First -Class Guide to Luxury Travel Explore the finest destinations and experiences around the world in the Forbes Passport newsletter. Email address 6 You may opt out any time. By signing up for this newsletter, you agree to the Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Follow me on Twitter. !•`� Jim Dobson 4 Sign Up I have been a world explorer for over 30 years, having visited more than 90 countries. I am highly experienced in exotic travel and extreme luxury adventures and have... Read More r Reprints & Permissions li L ADVERTISEMENT r r 497 4 of 4 3/22/21, 6:37 AM Monday, March 8, 2021 at 17:11:56 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Wave Park Concern - Coral Mountain Date: Monday, March 8, 2021 at 4:01:46 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Richard Harris To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov To whom it may concern..... This is a formal Request that we be placed on your notification list as the approval process moves forward on the above at Coral Mountain. Needless to say, we have grave concerns of the proposed 80 foot high light polls to align with some 2400 feet of the wave apparatus. With a backdrop against Coral Mountain, it is hard to imagine anything but a nightmare beaming across the valley and a blight on that beautiful natural resource. Does not the City of LaQuinta have a Dark Sky Ordnance to control and protect its population from such an occurrence -to include a decline in property values ? Thank you in advance for your assistance In this matter. Sincerely Richard Harris 59775 Seville LaQuinta CA 92253 425 985 3992 rwhseattle@gmail.com 49EPage 1 of 1 Monday, March 8, 2021 at 17:10:47 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Wave Park - Coral Mountain Date: Monday, March 8, 2021 at 5:05:21 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Richard Harris To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov To whom it may concern - May be a repeat ..... My wife and I are writing, requesting to join a notification list regarding the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park. The notion that a 2400 ft long wave apparatus, lined with 80 foot high light standards is of grave concern to the glare it will project onto Coral Mountain and to our home across the way. A potential drop in our home values adds even more to our concerns. Does not the City of LaQuinta have a Dark Sky ordinance to prevent such a happening ? Is there not a viable concern as to the environmental impact the lighting will cause ? Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter. Sincerely, Richard Harris 59775 Seville LaQuinta , CA 92253 rwhseattle@gmail.com 425 985 3992 (cell) 49SPage 1 of 1 Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, Ca. 92253 Dear Ms Criste: The proposed project entitled Coral Mountain Resort and Kelly Slater Wave/Surf Park has morphed over time from what was first proposed by Meriwether Development. In fact, we residents of Andalusia at Coral Mountain are under no disillusionment that this project is heading in the wrong direction especially for this unique area in the Valley. Over 13 years ago as we were evaluating purchasing a home in the Coachella Valley, we were introduced to Andalusia. Everything we desired in a home and location was at Andalusia at Coral Mountain. Off the busy path of Highway ill; virtually no car traffic during the day; no traffic noise at night; the inky black nights with glimmering stars uninterrupted by any kind of light. The Drummond family purchased and developed our community to provide a respite lifestyle far away from the stresses of the hustle and bustle of commercial developments and business. We chose to purchase our residence based on all of these and especially that to we Andalusia residents, the area was and would remain the pristine desert experience we intentionally sought. Through the years, we attended meetings to discuss the completion of the acres across from the entrance as planned --two more 18 hole golf courses and more Andalusia homes. Perfect. Then we attended a meeting which floated the idea of a Crystal Lagoon wave pool —beautiful, family friendly, an additional asset to our membership features. An asset and an excellent value for the community —still private. Then Sunrise Companies purchased our beloved community and promised to enhance and not destroy the very desirability and uniqueness of Andalusia at Coral Mountain. The property would be developed.... then it was sold. Then a walking tour last January I believe informed us of a different plan which, it too, has evolved. All this to say, is we residents see this to be a continuation of bait and switch and as I have read numerous articles on Kelly Slater Wave Company which now has been purchased by WSL and all the promises that the Surf Farm in Lemoore would be private have been undone. At the sheer cost to develop and maintain the operation and with it having its doors open 6 am to 10 or 11 pm 7 days a week, there is no way the park could remain private and be solvent. Being so close to the mountain and its shifting sand dirt, the crashing of the waves will reverberate and there is very little doubt sounds will not be heard or felt as we are in seismic territory. Not to mention, given that there are no real street lighting in the vicinity in any direction, the proposed tower "down" lights will be an issue and distraction and one that is not welcomed. One other point. Perhaps the key point for most of us. We are surrounded by residential, gated communities. Not one commercial entity until you reach Ralph's at Jefferson and Avenue 50... Never were there any mention of a rezoning to accommodate a tourist attraction, a hotel, a 500 wave park, etc. This is not what any of us agreed to at the time of our investment in this community and area. This is a quiet community by design and this proposed Surf Wave park will undue all of the aspects of this last area of pristine desert valley that have caused people to invest many millions of dollars, taxable dollars and call Andalusia home. I have attached several articles to confirm changes in Kelly Slater's company's own promises. FROM SWELLNET Friday, 4 August 2017 Kelly Slater has successfully applied for a permit to open his Central California wave pool to the public. Slater applied for a building permit with Kings County back in March. The application says the wavepool, called 'Surf Ranch', will be staffed with 50 employees split between recreational use and ongoing development of the wave generating systems. The development includes design improvements such as wave dampening to increase commercially viability. Once the wavepool is public, Slater and his investors plan to operate year-round from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. It also says the facility will incorporate the golf course to the east of the wavepool for recreational use such as outdoor music and camping for visitors. They are asking for a permit to hold large events - attracting as many as 8,000 visitors, six times a year. "Operations under this [Surf Ranch] will permit up to six events per calendar year, including recreational and competitive surfing events, and ancillary music performances during a two -to -four day period (i.e. Thursday through Sunday evening). Event operation time will be from 6 a.m. to 11 p.m. Attendance is estimated to be up to 8,000 guests per day, over a two -to -four day period. Temporary bleachers, sound equipment, and lighting equipment may be setup for events and live music performances. Parking will be provided on site during the events. Contracted services will include traffic control, security, temporary lighting, potable water, portable toilets, wash stations, and trash services for each event. " 501 FRIDAY OCTOBER 5, 2018 Since Kelly Slater dropped the first footage of his years - long secret wave pool project back in 2015, a single question has dominated idle lineup chatter: when will the gates be opened to the public? And not just to watch a contest, but to pay to surf it. Countless athletes, industry types, and celebrities have released footage of themselves playing king for a day in Lemoore. Plus, there are plenty of whispers of wealthy jet -setters with plenty of cash to blow renting out the place for a day for a ridiculous sum — the WSL and Kelly Slater Wave Company have been characteristically opaque about the actual pricing structure. But, when, if ever, will the layman be able to pony up for an hour of fun? According to Surf Ranch General Manager Sam Ramirez, don't hold your breath. "We are a private facility," explained Ramirez during a presentation at an October 2 Lemoore City Council meeting. "I often get asked if we'll ever open to the public, and the reality is we are a private facility and it will always remain that way." 502 Kelly Slater's Surf Ranch 2021 $2,950.00 *To pay in Full, choose Qty 29 to total $5,900.00 Finally you can come surf the best man-made wave in the world! Although we have been taking private groups to Lemoore the past 3 years, this is the first time we are offering it to you! Each spot includes the following: -4 sessions (1 hour each) -6 Priority Waves Per Person Per Hour -Includes Split Pool Format with Poaching -5 star private chef meals throughout the day at the wave ranch -Surf Coaching by Fulcrum Surf's Premier coaches -Professional Surf photography + Drone footage -Surf Ranch Instant video of all waves from the day -Beverages including coffee, water, and alcohol -Water Surf guides provided from the Wave Ranch Covid Procedures set in place for everyone's safety provided fro0m KSWC Deposit: $2,950.00. Once confirmed with the dates, you will have 3 days to cancel for full refund. Dates: (3 spots left) May 17 th & May 18th Event Split into 2 days *To pay in full, chose Qty 2, to total $5,900.00 NOT INCLUDED: -Transportation -Hotel (at Tachi Palace) -Shuttle from Hotel to wave ranch (2 minutes away) -all meals outside of the Wave Ranch Thank you for your time and consideration. Please take the many comments and letters you have received in your decision making. It is more than brick and mortar being affected. It is people's well being and investments. Sincerely, Kelly and George Hart $1455 Carboneras La Quinta, CA 92253 503 Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 09:12:24 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave Park Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 at 8:55:55 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Rhonda Hertel To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov To: Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of LaQuinta Dear Ms. Criste, I have been a golfer most of my adult life. I enjoy golf for many reasons. It is a game of concentration and competition. When I join a golf club, I look at the playability of the course, the beautiful vistas, the serene sounds of nature and the amenities of the club. This is why I am a member at Andalusia. I hope you will reconsider building a wave park next to Andalusia Country Club. The addition of this kind of complex will take away all of the reasons people choose to join or live in a golf community. A commercial sports complex, hotel, restaurants and multiple rentals with 80 foot lighting and hourly wave notification will destroy this club and the surrounding community. The wave notification and loud speakers can't help but cause a seismic disturbance as well. With this kind of facility being open all hours of the day and night, there is no way golfers or residents will enjoy the kind of serenity that attracted them to Andalusia in the first place. I am sure you will agree that this part of California has amazing tourist attractions and activities. Is there really a need to build this kind of facility next to an established golf and residential community that brings so many to this part of the country? I ask again that you reconsider this project for the sake of Andalusia Country Club and all of the other clubs nearby. Respectfully, Tom Devlin Sent by: Rhonda Hertel Assistant to Tom Devlin Devlin Enterprises P.O. Box 782170 Wichita, KS 67278 Phone: (316) 634-1800 Fax No: (316) 634-1809 504Page 1 of 1 Mary & Dennis Hill 58130 Aracena La Quinta, CA. 92253 949-499-5740 March 22, 2021 Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA. 92253 Re: Coral Mountain Resort Specific Plan NOP Dear Ms. Criste, We are owners at Andalusia Country Club and are opposed to the development of the Coral Mountain Resort across the street from our community. We feel it will negatively impact our lifestyle as well as the value of our property. We are asking for a much tougher review of this project plan. This plan is inconsistent with the City's General Plan / preferred land use map. Therefore, there is a need to process a zone change. The proposed development proposed in this zone change does not adequately designate a portion of the proposed amendment. Specifically, the proposed wave basin is not Tourist Commercial. It is in fact a stadium, no different than the tennis arenas and football stadiums in the nearby communities. The wave basin should not be labeled open space recreational when in fact what is proposed is an event stadium. This facility is to house surf events similar to surf events in beach side communities. The big difference it is set up to operate 24/7 all year long with 4 major events similar to Coachella and Stagecoach. Coachella and Stagecoach operate for 3 weeks out of the year and this proposes to have 4 events in a year. The rest of the year the facility will have stadium lighting to allow extended night operation yearly. During these major events traffic will be directed up Madison avenue to the proposed wave basin access entry, on Avenue 60, to accommodate the expected 2,400 people and the only area on the site to accommodate parking for the events. Noise for these events will be equal to the noise from Coachella and Stagecoach which are 3 miles away and the Thermal Club's race car track 5 miles away. This proposed stadium is across the street from Andalusia. Poor zone planning. 505 This development should have mitigating operating ordinances restricting operation to daylight hours only. That no structures of any kind can exceed the height limit of a two-story facility. And the wave basin and its equipment should be no higher than mitigating sound absorbing perimeter walls and berms. Again, this is an ill-conceived zoning change for a development that will not be harmonious with our neighborhood nor the overall character of The City of La Quinta. Respectfully, Mary & Dennis Hill CC: Randall Bone, Sunrise Company John Cummings, Andalusia Country Club 506 Friday, March 19, 2021 at 16:21:25 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Surf Park Opposition Date: Friday, March 19, 2021 at 3:58:07 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Bruce Howison To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov We would like to register our opposition to this use of the land in La Quinta. We believe the proposed development is incomplete, and inconsistent with the adjacent communities in La Quinta. Specifically: 1. We recently experienced a decade of drought in Southern California, and learned ways to reduce water usage. This development proposes large amounts of water usage and waste through evaporation in a Wave pool, which is inconsistent with our efforts to conserve water. 2. Light Pollution: the proposed stadium lighting surrounding the entertainment areas will result in significant light pollution for the surrounding area, including animal habitats in the adjacent mountains. Again this is inconsistent with efforts to preserve our wildlife. 3. Noise pollution: The noise associated with wave generation, and with other secondary sources such as music and loud speakers, which would be in place year round, are not consistent with the quiet, residential area we chose to live and invest in. 4. Incomplete plans: areas are designated for "future development" which could mean further inappropriate uses adjacent to our residential area, impacting our homes and neighborhood. The plans do not commit to building this in phase 1. Thank you for considering our concerns, Bruce and Valerie Howison 80837 Calle Azul La Quinta CA 92253 50 r-Page 1 of 1 Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 11:35:21 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave park Date: Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 10:56:14 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Jim Huckins To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov My name is James Huckins I am a member of Andalusia, the proposed wave park and impact on local residences is unacceptable. The fact that La Quinta is allowing this to move forward under proposed design tells everyone you could care less about the people who will live around it. Prepare for a fight Jim 50EPage 1 of 1 Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico G?EC t--- l`JEJ MAR 3 0 2021 CM OF LA QUINTA nLGry�� AND 0ZVL=LOPMENT DEPARTMENT I am writing today as a Trilogy resident to voice my opposition to the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park resort development in La Quinta. Below is the summary of the development as presented by Merriweather Development, published press releases, and local newspaper articles: Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort will be a mega resort for over 4800 overnight tourists, with a 17 acre wave pool as the main attraction. 1.The coral mountain resort will not be a residential neighborhood as it is currently zoned. 2.The 600 dwelling units with unlimited number of bedrooms and bathrooms available for overnight rental, could easily have four bedrooms, allowing eight guests per unit. 600 units times eight people equals 4800 people potentially staying in the units. All units are available on an overnight basis the same as the hotel. These would be vacationers. 3.The Wave Park Coral Mountain will not be a residential neighborhood this will be a commercial resort with the wave park as the main feature. 4.. The wave pool will cover 17 acres, a length of 2600 feet, needing 18 million gallons of water to work. The wave pool water evaporation rate is 30,000 to 180,000 gallons of water daily. Plans include stadium bleacher seating on each long side, and many 80-foot-tall stadium style lighting towers for night surfing. Land substance from depletion of our water table is a significant issue. Taking water from Lake Mead and the Colorado River is an ethically an environmentally reprehensible and unacceptable - solutions that we have already implemented to refill our water table. 5. Plans have the wave pool running 365 days a year from 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM (some newspaper articles have stated it will run nightly until 10:00 PM) for the high number of tourists staying at the hotel or in a dwelling unit. 6. Loudspeakers projecting above the wave pool in all directions are needed for the wave pool announcer to call the 30 second countdown for every single wave with up to 12 waves per hour as the surfer needs to be alerted for the coming wave. The noise level of the wave crashing has been measured at 75 decibels at Kelly Slater surf ranch. This noise level is comparable to the sound of cars traveling on a busy Interstate highway. The generators creating the waves will be running nonstop every day. 7. Plans include music stages for entertainment as each end of the wait pool, and other locations in the resort. 8.. In addition to the wave pool, there will be more artificial lagoons and lakes for E foiling (a motorized hydrofoil paddle board that you stand on, not lie on) and stand-up paddle boarding. 9. Concrete sports park for the bike park will include tracks for skateboarding, BMX, and mountain bikes -all with stadium style light towers. 509 10. Coral mountain resort has requested 16 days and nights for special events. 16 days is more days than Coachella fest and Stagecoach combined! To make matters worse the 16 days are spread out over four day long weekends set up and taken down for each special event weekend will easily add another 32 days of high traffic conditions. 11. The 80 foot tall stadium style light tower illuminating the way pool, swimming pools, skateboard park, BMX track, and other sports courts, acres of parking lots, streets, and 117,000 square feet of commercial buildings will be lit inside and out. The spill lighting will affect the surrounding community. No more dark skies. What has happened to La Quinta's anti- light pollution stance? 12. The approval of this project will permanently bring light pollution, noise, and traffic. There will be permanent and ongoing noise from the wave generators, breaking waves, the lodgers, guests, loud- speakers and entertainment venues on site every day until late in the evening. 13. Heavy construction equipment will be working at 85 decibels or more. to the coral mountain Property values cannot be sustained with the long term pollution, noise, and traffic. 14 Ecologically, the project will scrape away every inch of bio crust, creating the need for even more water trucks to keep the dust down. Bio crust is the desert through the desert wet the tundra is to the high elevations. Both tundra and bio crust take many hundreds of years to replace once damage think of the impact. 15 this project will forever ruin the stunning and natural topography of the area erasing the absolute silent evenings and the dark skies enjoyed currently by all residents of the area 16 The effect on the desert's wildlife will be devastating. Already we have lost so many of the hares that ran around this part of the desert. With the hares gone the coyotes soon followed. How can this project ever pass an environmental impact statement? There will be no coming back if the City Council approves this horrendous project. Putting a wave park in a desert setting is something that Phoenix would do. This is the wrong type of development to be placed in La Quinta and I urge you to vote down this project. It would be an horrific mistake and one that we could never recover from. Sincerely, Susan and Bruce Hunter `,x6w 4_e� 81686 Prism Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 twsar,6h er 31 @) VO-J c Owt 510 Friday, March 12, 2021 at 17:04:12 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Zoning Change Date: Friday, March 12, 2021 at 4:14:28 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Brian Hurd To: consultingplanner@laquinta.gov Attn. Nicole Sauviat Christensen Dear Nicole, It is my understanding that a development aka. Coral Mountain Surf Resort is conducting an environmental assessment and will require a zoning change from low density residential to tourism/commercial. I would like to state my extreme concern and absolute opposition to such a resort development or zoning change for a number of reasons. Having read the information available, the proposal indicates a resort development of massive proportions, far beyond the scope of anything ever imagined for the Coachella valley on a permanent basis (ie. not including Coachella Fest). As proposed, "the resort" would be a very high density, energy consuming, over polluting, environmental nightmare catering to an elitist clientele, without any benefit to the general public or community of La Quinta. As a tax -paying resident of the Madison/58th area, I have seen first hand the pressures placed on the community during annual events such as "the American Express" golf tournament or "Coachella Fest" in reference to traffic volumes/flow patterns. The effect of 5,600 nightly visitors plus required staff plus commercial deliveries in and out of the resort on a daily basis is unimaginable. Also worth considering is the noise and light pollution created daily (multiplied during events), airborne dust during 10-20 yrs worth of construction, the added strain on infrastructure due to water/power requirements and most importantly, the degradation of lifestyle enjoyment for the thousands of residents in adjacent neighbourhoods. I've been around long enough to see La Quinta rebound from the effects of the '08 financial crisis, Old Town revitalize itself, mothballed projects reborn, resident and visitor numbers grow, community projects fulfilled. A golf course community at Coral Mtn as is now zoned for (even if private) would be a welcome addition, in keeping with what area residents and visitors are used to. The proposed private, theme park like resort concept has no place there nor does it fit with the official community plan. It is my hope that the City of La Quinta and it's council will have the common sense and good judgement to consider the proposal for Coral Mountain Surf Resort ill-conceived and unworthy for a zoning change. Thank you for your consideration of the aforementioned comments and concerns. Brian J. Hurd 80825 Calle Azul La Quinta, CA 604-698-8469 Sent from my iPad 51 'Page 1 of 1 Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 13:24:18 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 1:20:37 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: tjjackoboice@charter.net To: 'consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov' CC: 'bajackoboice@charter.net' March 23, 2021 Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta Email: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste, As winter visitors to the Coachella Valley since the early 1990's we ultimately purchased a home at Andalusia Country Club. The decision was carefully considered. This corner of the City of La Quinta provides tranquility, a rugged natural beauty and an extraordinary lack of night-time artificial light. Limited commercial zoning in this sector of the city was an important factor in our decision to buy a home at Andalusia. The original master plan for the property in question was a golf community and an extension of Andalusia Country Club which we fully supported. We write to you today to add to the growing number of homeowners voicing concerns about the proposed Coral Mountain Resort. We certainly understand the importance of growth within our city, however we feel the rezoning of the property and the nature of the business plan has the potential to destroy the aesthetic and environmental value of this terrain while negatively impacting the quality of life for those living near it. Our primary objections to the proposed development are as follows: Rezoning for Tourist Commercial specifically the Wave Park, The concept is trendy and novel but placing an artificial wave basin at the foot of Coral Mountain represents an assault on this enduring landmark. The proposed intensive use of the land is incompatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. Rezoning to General Commercial at the corner of 58th and Madison- We feel this change will launch an unnecessary commercial domino effect. La Quinta just approved a new commercial center literally twelve minutes away at Jefferson and 50th Light pollution —Tall light polls to be erected around the wave park for night-time use of the facility are simply unacceptable! The dark sky movement embraced by the City of La Quinta should apply to this development. Noise Pollution- Having lived across the street for eight years we can attest that noise ricochets loudly off mountain surfaces. The water basin will also exponentially raise the sound level. Extensive studies need to be conducted on the potential noise emanating from equipment and amplified speakers. Traffic — Recreational, hotel and special event vehicle traffic to and from this development will forever change air emissions and congestion around the development. Surrounding Property Value Concerns- A decrease in property values are likely as a result of this development. Ms. Sauviat Criste, we request that La Quinta scrutinize the developer's plan and objectives through the important lens of the city's longstanding environmental regulations and goals. We furthermore ask that you take seriously the voiced concerns and objections of all those writing to you. Kindly place us on your mailing list so that we may follow 51 Tage 1 of 2 the project as it flows through the city's review process. Our emails are as follows: bajackoboice@charter.net and tjjackoboice@charter.net With sincere respect and appreciation for your time, Barbara & Thomas Jackoboice 81441 Andalusia, La Quinta, CA 92253 51 Yage 2 of 2 Friday, March 19, 2021 at 16:35:03 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Proposed Project for Wave Park, Etcetera Date: Friday, March 19, 2021 at 4:31:16 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: J To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 March 19, 2021 We are writing today as Trilogy La Quinta residents to voice our opposition to the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort development in La Quinta. Below is the summary of the development as presented by Meriwether Development, published press releases, and local newspaper articles: Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort will be a mega resort for over 4,800 overnight tourists, with a 17- Acre Wave Pool as the main attraction. 1. The Coral Mountain Resort will not be a residential neighborhood as it is currently zoned. It instead will be a high energy Resort containing a 600+ person occupancy hotel complete with restaurants, bars, and entertainment all available on a per night basis. 2. The 600 "Dwelling Units" with unlimited number of bedrooms & bathrooms available for overnight rental, could easily have 4 bedrooms, allowing 8 guests per unit. 600 Units x 8 people= 4,800 people potentially staying in the Units. All units are available on an overnight Basis the same as the Hotel. The people coming to Coral Mountain are Vacationers, not Residents. 3. The Wave Park Coral Mountain will not be a Residential Neighborhood. This will be a commercial Resort with The Wave Park as the main feature. 4. The Wave Pool will cover 17 acres, a length of 2,600 feet, needing 18 million gallons of water to work. The Wave Pool water evaporation rate is 30,000 to 180,000 gallons of water daily. Plans include stadium bleacher seating on each long side, and many 80' tall stadium - style lighting towers for Night Surfing. Land subsidence from depletion of our water table is a significant issue. Taking water from Lake Mead and the Colorado River is an ethically and environmentally reprehensible and unacceptable solution that we have already implemented to refill our water table. 5. Plans have the Wave Pool running 365 days a year from 7 am to 7 pm (some newspaper articles have stated it will run nightly until 10 pm) for the 4,800 tourists staying at the hotel or in a dwelling unit. 6. Loudspeakers projecting above The Wave Pool in all directions are needed for the Wave Pool Announcer to call the 30 second countdown for every single wave with up to 12 waves per hour. The surfer needs to be alerted for the coming Wave, as there is no Ocean to watch or feel until "the big one" comes. A Wave is manufactured every 5 to 6 minutes. The noise level of the Wave crashing has been measured at 75 decibels at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch. This noise level is comparable to the sound of cars traveling on a busy interstate highway. The generators creating the waves will be running non-stop, every day. 7. Plans include Music Stages for Entertainment at each end of The Wave Pool, and other 514Page 1 of 3 locations in the Resort. The music will increase the decibels exponentially. 8. In addition to the Wave Pool, there will be more artificial lagoons and lakes for E-Foiling (a motorized hydrofoil paddle board that you stand on, not lie on) and Stand -Up paddle boarding. More Noise! 9. Concrete sports parks for the Bike park with pump tracks for skateboarding, BMX, and mountain bikes — all with stadium style light towers. So much for La Quinta's magical views and atmosphere. 10. Coral Mountain Resort has requested 16 days and nights for Special Events. 16 days is more days than Coachella Fest and Stagecoach combined! To make matters worse, the 16 days are spread out over four 4- day long weekends. Set up and take down for each Special Event Weekend will easily add another 32 days of high traffic conditions. NOISE! 11. The 80' tall stadium style light towers illuminating The Wave Pool, swimming pools, Skateboard Park, BMX Track, other Sports Courts, acres of parking lots, streets, and 117,000 square feet of Commercial Buildings will be lit inside and out. The spill lighting will affect the surrounding community. No more dark skies .... What has happened to La Quinta's anti -light pollution stance? 12. The approval of this project will permanently bring light pollution, noise, and traffic. There will be permanent and on -going noise from the wave generators, breaking waves, the lodgers, guests, loudspeakers and entertainment venues on -site every day until late in the evening. 13. Heavy Construction equipment will be working at 85 decibels or more, non-stop all day long, for the next 10-20 years- (according to Coral Mountain developers own projection). Property values cannot be sustained with the long term pollution, noise, and traffic of the Wave Park. Lower property values will lower property taxes and La Quinta's financial health. 14. The project will scrape away every inch of" biocrust", creating the need for even more Water Trucks to keep the dust down. "Biocrust "is to the Desert what "Tundra" is to the high elevations. Both tundra and biocrust take many hundreds of years to replace once damaged. Think of the impact on the Deserts already questionable water supply as just 2 years ago we were asked to dramatically cut back on water usage. Demands for water will only increase in future years. 15. This project will forever mar the stunning natural topography of the area, forever erasing the absolute silent evenings and dark skies enjoyed currently by all residents of the area. This Coral Mountain Resort project does not have any of the characteristics of the surrounding low- density up -scale residential neighborhoods. This is a Mega Resort, not a residential neighborhood. This type of development is completely uncompatible with any of the surrounding neighborhoods for miles in every direction. City Planners and City Council Members, ask yourself, would you want to live next door to a Water Sports-Themed Amusement Park with 80 foot high stadium lighting, noise from concert venues, BMX motor bike racing, and wave machines and traffic 24/7? The approval of the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Amusement Park style Resort will permanently cause the irreplaceable loss of the peaceful, quiet, serene atmosphere that this part of La Quinta is renowned for. Allowing this extremely large Tourist/Commercial Resort into our quiet low -density residential, golf -oriented neighborhoods, will negatively affect every Homeowner for miles around. There will be no coming back. The value of our homes and the quality of life of living and being in the "Quiet Zone" of La Quinta will be forever degraded. I urge the City of La Quinta NOT to change the zoning from the current designation Low - Density Residential w/ 18-hole golf course to TOURIST/COMMERCIAL . I urge you not to allow Short Term Vacation Rentals (STVR) and the problems that accompany them. 51 EPage 2 of 3 This proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort is exactly the WRONG type of develop for this location. You are literally planning to drop a tourist amusement park resort in the middle of a quiet residential zone. Please do not allow this project to move forward. Sincerely, Carol and Tom Jensen 81511 Ulrich La Quinta, CA 92253 760-620-3819 51 gage 3 of 3 Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 09:51:30 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Objection to Coral Mountain Wave Park Development Date: Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 9:47:21 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Chris Jones To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 March 14, 2021 We are writing today as a Trilogy La Quinta resident to voice my opposition to the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort development in La Quinta. Below is the summary of the development as presented by Meriwether Development, published press releases, and local newspaper articles: Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort will be a mega resort for over 4,800 overnight tourists, with a 17- Acre Wave Pool as the main attraction. 1. The Coral Mountain Resort will not be a residential neighborhood as it is currently zoned. It instead will be a high energy Resort containing a 600+ person occupancy hotel complete with restaurants, bars, and entertainment all available on a per night basis. 2. The 600 "Dwelling Units" with unlimited number of bedrooms & bathrooms available for overnight rental, could easily have 4 bedrooms, allowing 8 guests per unit. 600 Units x 8 people= 4,800 people potentially staying in the Units. All units are available on an overnight Basis the same as the Hotel. The people coming to Coral Mountain are Vacationers, not Residents. 3. The Wave Park Coral Mountain will not be a Residential Neighborhood. This will be a commercial Resort with The Wave Park as the main feature. 4. The Wave Pool will cover 17 acres, a length of 2,600 feet, needing 18 million gallons of water to work. The Wave Pool water evaporation rate is 30,000 to 180,000 gallons of water daily. Plans include stadium bleacher seating on each long side, and many 80' tall stadium- style lighting towers for Night Surfing. Land subsidence from depletion of our water table is a significant issue. Taking water from Lake Mead and the Colorado River is an ethically and environmentally reprehensible and unacceptable solution that we have already implemented to refill our water table. Now we want to plan to take more harmful measures by implementing the Wave Park? 5. Plans have the Wave Pool running 365 days a year from 7 am to 7 pm (some newspaper articles have stated it will run nightly until 10 pm) for the 4,800 tourists staying at the hotel or in a dwelling unit. 6. Loudspeakers projecting above The Wave Pool in all directions are needed for the Wave Pool Announcer to call the 30 second countdown for every single wave with up to 12 waves per hour. The surfer needs to be alerted for the coming Wave, as there is no Ocean to watch or feel until "the big one" comes. A Wave is manufactured every 5 to 6 minutes. The noise level of the Wave crashing has been measured at 75 decibels at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch. This noise level is comparable to the sound of cars traveling on a busy interstate highway. The generators creating the waves will be running non-stop, every day. 7. Plans include Music Stages for Entertainment at each end of The Wave Pool, and other locations in the Resort. 8. In addition to the Wave Pool, there will be more artificial lagoons and lakes for E-Foiling (a motorized hydrofoil paddle board that you stand on, not lie on) and Stand -Up paddle boarding. 9. Concrete sports parks for the Bike park with pump tracks for skateboarding, BMX, and mountain bikes — all 51 113age 1 of 3 with stadium style light towers. So much for La Quinta's magical views and atmosphere. 10. Coral Mountain Resort has requested 16 days and nights for Special Events. 16 days is more days than Coachella Fest and Stagecoach combined! To make matters worse, the 16 days are spread out over four 4- day long weekends. Set up and take down for each Special Event Weekend will easily add another 32 days of high traffic conditions. 11. The 80' tall stadium style light towers illuminating The Wave Pool, swimming pools, Skateboard Park, BMX Track, other Sports Courts, acres of parking lots, streets, and 117,000 square feet of Commercial Buildings will be lit inside and out. The spill lighting will affect the surrounding community. No more dark skies.... What has happened to La Quinta's anti -light pollution stance? 12. The approval of this project will permanently bring light pollution, noise, and traffic. There will be permanent and on -going noise from the wave generators, breaking waves, the lodgers, guests, loudspeakers and entertainment venues on -site every day until late in the evening. 13. Heavy Construction equipment will be working at 85 decibels or more, non-stop all day long, for the next 10-20 years- (according to Coral Mountain developers own projection). Property values cannot be sustained with the long term pollution, noise, and traffic of the Wave Park. Lower property values will lower property taxes and La Quinta's financial health. 14. The project will scrape away every inch of" biocrust", creating the need for even more Water Trucks to keep the dust down. "Biocrust "is to the Desert what "Tundra" is to the high elevations. Both tundra and biocrust take many hundreds of years to replace once damaged. Think of the impact on the Deserts already questionable water supply as just 2 years ago we were asked to dramatically cut back on water usage. Demands for water will only increase in future years. 15. This project will forever mar the stunning natural topography of the area, forever erasing the absolute silent evenings and dark skies enjoyed currently by all residents of the area. This Coral Mountain Resort project does not have any of the characteristics of the surrounding low- density up -scale residential neighborhoods. This is a Mega Resort, not a residential neighborhood. This type of development is completely not compatible with any of the surrounding neighborhoods for miles in every direction. City Planners and City Counsel Members, ask yourself, would you want to live next door to a Water Sports- Themed Amusement Park with 80 foot high stadium lighting, noise from concert venues, BMX motor bike racing, and wave machines and traffic 24/7? The approval of the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Amusement Park style Resort will permanently cause the irreplaceable loss of the peaceful, quiet, serene atmosphere that this part of La Quinta is renowned for. Allowing this extremely large Tourist/Commercial Resort into our quiet low -density residential, golf - oriented neighborhoods, will negatively affect every Homeowner for miles around. There will be no coming back. The value of our homes and the quality of life of living and being in the "Quite Zone" of La Quinta will be forever degraded. I urge the City of La Quinta NOT to change the zoning from the current designation Low -Density Residential w/ 18-hole golf course to TOURIST/COMMERCIAL . I urge you not to allow Short Term Vacation Rentals (STVR) and the problems that accompany them. This proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort is exactly the WRONG type of develop for this location. You are literally planning to drop a tourist amusement park resort in the middle of a quiet residential zone. Please do not allow this project to move forward. Sincerely, Trilogy Resident Christine and Steve Jones 60523 White Sage Dr La Quinta, CA 92253 cmrj1968@gmail.com 51 EPage 2 of 3 Monday, March 15, 2021 at 09:18:52 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: NOTICE OF OBJECTION - Coral Mountain zoning change request Date: Monday, March 15, 2021 at 9:13:48 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Ken Jones To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov March 15, 2021 Dear Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste, Meriwether Development has requested a zoning change in South La Quinta from Low -Density Residential with golf course to Tourist/Commercial. We hereby file our Objection to the requested zoning designation for the subject 400-acre parcel following reasons: • A grotesque incursion into South La Quinta's "quiet zone" residential character will be the inevitable result of the requested zoning change. • The requested zoning designation is incompatible with current and planned residential development in the environs. • Is the City of La Quinta willing to crush the dreams of its South La Quinta residents who sought specific quality of life and investment outcomes, by fulfilling the dreams of a commercial developer? Sincerely, Kenneth D Jones Patricia S Jones 60179 Honeysuckle St La Quinta, CA 92253 51 SPage 1 of 1 Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 07:56:12 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Attention Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste - RE: LQ wave park proposal Coral Mountain Resort Date: Monday, March 8, 2021 at 6:40:17 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Mark Kelson To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Monica Kelson Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste- A great deal of concern has arising regarding the project above, mainly because it barely resembles the project in size or scope that was presented to the owners at Andalusia, and presumably others, when we discussed the sale of the property and the creation of the project more than a year and a half ago. The project has become much larger than originally planned, it has grown not only in area, but also in height, overall dimension and it will undoubtedly negatively impact our property values, quality of life and the aesthetics of the area in and around our club and our community. Had we known that the project would be modified in the manner now being proposed, we NEVER would have gone along with the plan. We strongly object to the planned development. Without getting into the numerous specifics that are concerning us, and which fly in the face of what was originally approved, here are some suggestions: 1. The wave activities should only be permitted during the day. Nighttime activities will attract undesirable elements, and possibly crime, to the project and the entire area generally. They will create untenable noise, traffic and other serious issues, including glaring lights from the planned project across the entire neighborhood, neighboring clubs and huge swaths of residential areas. No one needs to ride waves at night —this is a residential area with thousands of homes, serene golf courses and beautiful vistas, not Disneyland. 2. The size of the park should be limited to conform to the area, the neighborhood and the character of the clubs that were originally intended to occupy the property. Originally, the wave project was going to be a planned golf extension of the Andalusia club. This changed when Sunrise bought the club and saw the opportunity to quickly cash in on the land originally planned for other uses. Given the history and nature of the property, the size of the project must be limited in height, area, density and overall usage. Otherwise it will destroy our community and our neighborhood. Again, we strongly object to the planned development. It is not what was intended when we purchased our homes, it was not what was agreed to when Sunrise described it to us and sold the property, and it is not what is acceptable now, to our community or our neighbors. We are available to attend meetings and for our voices to be heard. 52CPage 1 of 2 Thank you. Best regards. Mark and Monica Kelson 52-Page 2 of 2 Friday, March 26, 2021 at 15:19:17 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Park Date: Friday, March 26, 2021 at 3:16:18 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Mary and Steve Kenyon To: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov We own a home in Trilogy La Quinta near this proposed project. We did a lot of homework before buying in La Quinta and at this location as our first choice was Palm Desert. Although the sales tax is less in Palm Desert, we still shop locally to support the city and it's businesses. While we realized that the Trilogy development was rather isolated, we did research what the undeveloped and rural areas nearby were zoned. We had no issues with being near farmland and proposed future housing communities. We loved the views and felt any new construction allowed would be something to enhance the area where so many come to retreat from noisy and crowded urban life. We would never had considered buying near any sort of commercial development of the type proposed for this wave park, with a hotel, multiple recreational areas etc., private or not. The noise and traffic alone will destroy what we value in our home's location and it certainly will discourage those who use our area as a bicyclist's haven. It is a travesty that La Quinta would disregard the beauty of that location and the surrounding home owners' existence to allow a developer to even think they could change the zoning and destroy a reason many of us bought our homes. If this zoning change is allowed, despite what any EIR says, we know we will be negatively impacted. We can hear the race cars in Thermal, despite what we were assured by our county supervisor when it was proposed. Our immediate solution will be to no longer support any La Quinta businesses and attempt to sell the house before construction starts, and NOT ever shop or buy again in La Quinta... Mary & Stephen Kenyon 81524 Dove Canyon Court L.Q. 92253 52Tage 1 of 1 Monday, March 15, 2021 at 07:45:39 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Objection to Coral Mountain Wave Park Development Date: Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 5:57:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Rosette Kivel To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: leevans@laquintaca.gov Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 74-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA March 14, 2021 Greetings, My wife and I are sending you this e-mail over our concern about the Coral Mountain Wave Park Development & how it will impact our community & our lives. We live in Trilogy & have been here for the the last 12 tears . We left city living , and opted for a peaceful ,remote , picturesque. senior community to spend our golden years . Living in Trilogy comes at a cost : 25 minutes to shop , 45 minutes to see a MD.. etc. But these are all small sacrifices to make for the beautiful desert and mountain views , the peace & quiet of living in an over 55 community, and rural as opposed to living in a city or to close to a busy noisy highway. Those things are more convenient , but we gladly sacrificed them for tranquility . Now this Coral Mountain Development threatens everything. It doesn't seem right that you can approve this project & displace 1250 taxpaying homeowners .who are retirees .just so a developer can make money at our expense . We have been paying our taxes & supporting La Quinta through thick & thin for many years now, what about us ,are you going to throw us under the bus ? We would appreciate your support on this very important matter! Say no to this Development. Thanks for your attention , Rosette & Stanley Kivel 61345 Fire Barrel Dr La Quinta, CA 92253 52Yage 1 of 1 Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 07:57:02 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Park Development Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 4:28:33 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Rosette Kivel To: levans@laquintaca.gov CC: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Mayor Evans: I am writing to you as a Trilogy Resident to express my concerns regarding the Development of the Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort which will include a 4,800 overnight tourists stay and a 17 acre wave pool. There are many in our community as well as surrounding communities who have decided that this would have negative affect on our tranquility and life style. The additional traffic and the loud noise would adversely effect the value of our homes. The other consideration is that such a development would draw on the La Quinta resources such police, firemen, traffic personnel, and finally our most precious water supply. It would be prudent for the town of La Quinta to initiate an impact study before going forward with such a development. If necessary I could forward a more detailed letter of the development as composed by one of my neighbors which was sent to your consultant planner. Thank you for you attention to the above. Sincerely, Rosette Kivel 61345 Fire Barrel Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 Sent from my iPad 524Page 1 of 1 Monday, March 22, 2021 at 12:46:51 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Date: Monday, March 22, 2021 at 12:40:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Larry Krause To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov To: Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Larry & Sandra Krause 58325 Carmona La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone: (403) 619-2717 Re: Coral Mountain Resort — Development Dear Nicole, As a resident and homeowner at Andalusia for the past 10 years the Coral Mountain Development is of significant concern to us. We attended the open house at Andalusia over a year ago when the proposed development was outlined in a presentation.. There seem to be a significant number of changes that cause us concern and were not part of the proposal when we attended the open house. Our concerns obviously center upon the "WAVEPARK" and how it may be intrusive to the enjoyment of our residence and community. While we do not oppose orderly development of residential properties in the area and some commercial development to support the residential communities the WAVEPARK is obviously a significant departure from that form of commercial activity. Our concerns are centered on a number of issues which we have outlined below: 1. NOISE — Operating from what we understand will be early morning (6AM) until late at night (11PM) the Wave park is likely to disturb the peace and solitude that we have come to enjoy at Andalusia and which under pinned our decision to move there ever though it was a long way from commercial development (shopping & restaurants etc.). Now we find the reason we chose the area is likely to be interfered with by a wave park that has water turbines, water tunnels and loud music playing 17 hours a day interfering with our peace and quiet.. Further, the loud music that is apparently played to provide enjoyment for the surfers will again be 17 hours of interruption to our quite enjoyment of our residential home and provides absolutely no commercial value to us a resident of Andalusia or the City of La Quinta. Noises in the quite desert environment travel long distances quickly and we do expect this to be any different. We constantly hear race cars on the track located several miles from us and this development is only 1/2 mile away. LIGHTING — We understand the proposed development includes the installation of 80-foot- tall light poles to light up the wavepark at night and possibly early morning. This will create a significant intrusion to the sights we enjoy ats a resident and our views of Coral Mountain and the background mountains at sunset. Now it seems we will be looking into light poles and being subjected to loud music until the park closes. 3. HOURS OF OPERATION — We are very concerned about operations running 17-18 hours per day, 7 days per week, 52 weeks of the year, with constant light and noise pollution, to the disadvantage of existing residents who have moved to the area to enjoy exactly the opposite. 52,Tage 1 of 2 4. HOTEL — It looks like the size of the hotel has doubled from what was originally presented to us from a 2 story building of about 60 units to a four-story hotel fours stories in height comprise 150 units. Thanks goodness the roadways to the area are nice and wide and can probably handle the extra traffic caused by the development but the height of the hotel again raises concerns for us as it will impede our sight lines and sunset enjoyment. As a resident, homeowner, and property taxpayer in the City of La Quinta we cannot support the proposed development as presented for the reasons we have identified above. We hope that our corners, and those of others, will be taken seriously in the decision -making process. Yours truly, Larry B. Krause 52Wage 2 of 2 Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 12:28:07 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Opposition to Coral Mountain Surf Park Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 12:17:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Stephanie Lafortune To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Nicole Sauviat Christie, I am voicing my opposition to the Coral Mountain Surf Park, for the following reasons. I have lived in Trilogy LaQuinta for 14 years and have enjoyed the peace and quiet of living away from the traffic and noise. I believe that this resort would take away from the lifestyle I have come to enjoy. I also believe that it would reduce our property values, as well as the resale value. The extra traffic on our streets would do more damage than good. The heavy equipment during the course of building the resort would be damaging, as well as very noisy. And once the resort is finished, the extra tourist traffic on our streets would be of no benefit to the residents living out here. Thank you for your consideration, Stephanie La Fortune 951-237-2943 Trilogy LaQuinta Sent from my Wad 527Page 1 of 1 Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 09:31:53 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Surf Resort- Public Comment Date: Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 9:11:05 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Stephanie Langelaar To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov PUBLIC COMMENT ON CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT SURF PARK Dear Ms. Sauviat-Criste, As a future new resident of Andalusia Country Club, my husband and I would like to OPPOSE the construction of the Kelly Slater Wave Pool and Resort that is being planned at the Coral Mountain Location. We purchased a primary home in Andalusia (81636 Ronda) and it is currently under construction. We understand that an amendment has been added to the wave pool and resort plan that would significantly increase the negative effects that this resort will have on local residents. If possible, we would like to have access to this permit, to view exactly what the developers are requesting to add. Our understanding is, as follows: -A four-story hotel -80 foot light towers -A loudspeaker announcing each wave -up to 75 decibels of noise (loudness of a car horn) coming from the wave generating complex. -Significant number of STVRs These items would make living close to this resort untenable for us and many others for the following reasons: 1. Sound- sound travels very easily in this part of La Quinta, we hear the airport and the Thermal Club Race track on a routine basis, the sounds are intermittent and not particularly disruptive. However, a loudspeaker announcing each wave (as often as every 30 seconds) would be an incredible annoyance and disruption to our quality of life. We did not move to La Quinta to hear loud sounds of any kind- we are here for the calmness and the subtle spa -like atmosphere. We are sure many others feel the same. 75 decibels generated with each wave is as loud as a car horn. We would not be able to live with this level of sound, and its not appropriate for a low -density residential area. 2. Vibration/seismic disturbances- we are aware that these wave pools also generate vibration of the earth which would could cause discomfort for local resident as well as cracking of any elements in contact with the earth, pools, spas, patios, foundations, etc. this is unacceptable. 3. Light- we value the darkness and subtle lighting throughout La Quinta. Adding 80 foot light towers to illuminate the wave pool for night-time surfing would be very disruptive to local residents, bright lights at night disturb sleep and the enjoyment of residential outdoor areas at night. In this rural location, these light towers would be extremely visible for many miles. Light pollution is unhealthy and we believe La Quinta is a"Dark Sky" community, and are not sure this would be in compliance with that Ordinance. 4. Multi -story hotel- Originally, we believe the hotel was planned to be two stories. To allow a four story building in rural La Quinta, would be a travesty. It does not fit with the character of La Quinta and would ruin the visual appeal of the Coral Mountain Area. This would add much more traffic and congestion to a residential area. 5. STVRs, although STVRs are acceptable within certain requirements and limits, to add transient residents to an area that is very low -density residential will add a lot of congestion, traffic and noise issues. Does La Quinta really need MORE short-term residents that don't add much to the city of La Quinta. They don't see the doctor or the dentist here, patronize the local merchants like dry-cleaners, and above all, they do not create a sense of a vibrant community. 52EPage 1 of 2 We would like to reiterate, we are moving to La Quinta for many reasons, beautiful scenery, low -congestion, quiet atmosphere. To allow this Wave Park and Resort at the Coral Mountain site will ruin any enjoyment of the area for us and many other residents. It is not an appropriate location for this type of operation and will be very disruptive. We understand a EIR will be undertaken, but please consider that the environment includes residents and the impact on the local residents is not to be disregarded. Thank You, Albert and Stephanie Langelaar 529�age 2 of 2 Friday, March 19, 2021 at 06:41:14 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Fwd: Opposition to Surf Park Development Date: Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 5:07:39 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Sandy Lanham To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Ms. Criste, > We are residents of Trilogy. The main reason we moved here was to get away from the hustle and bustle of everyday life and to enjoy some peace and quiet. We are opposed to the construction of the surf park. The upheaval to the environment, the noise and traffic are not consistent with this area or the City of La Quinta. > There are three other surf parks planned for this valley: Palm Springs, Palm Desert and Thermal. That seems like an overkill and only confirms that we, the citizens of La Quinta, do not need one here in our backyard. > I know that you have received other letters so I won't list all of the negatives. I understand that the taxes generated from this project would benefit the City, but so will adding housing to that parcel of land. > Please reconsider this project and the consequences it will create. > Sincerely, > Kenneth & Sandra Lanham > Sandy.Ianham@yahoo.com 53(Page 1 of 1 Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 09:45:12 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Objection to Coral Mountain Wave Park Development Date: Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 9:09:39 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Bob Lasser To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 March 13, 2021 I am writing today as a Trilogy La Quinta resident to voice my opposition to the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort development in La Quinta. Below is the summary of the development as presented by Meriwether Development, published press releases, and local newspaper articles: Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort will be a mega resort for over 4,800 overnight tourists, with a 17- Acre Wave Pool as the main attraction. 1. The Coral Mountain Resort will not be a residential neighborhood as it is currently zoned. It instead will be a high energy Resort containing a 600+ person occupancy hotel complete with restaurants, bars, and entertainment all available on a per night basis. 2. The 600 "Dwelling Units" with unlimited number of bedrooms & bathrooms available for overnight rental, could easily have 4 bedrooms, allowing 8 guests per unit. 600 Units x 8 people= 4,800 people potentially staying in the Units. All units are available on an overnight Basis the same as the Hotel. The people coming to Coral Mountain are Vacationers, not Residents. 3. The Wave Park Coral Mountain will not be a Residential Neighborhood. This will be a commercial Resort with The Wave Park as the main feature. 4. The Wave Pool will cover 17 acres, a length of 2,600 feet, needing 18 million gallons of water to work. The Wave Pool water evaporation rate is 30,000 to 180,000 gallons of water daily. Plans include stadium bleacher seating on each long side, and many 80' tall stadium- style lighting towers for Night Surfing. 5. Plans have the Wave Pool running 365 days a year from 7 am to 7 pm (some newspaper articles have stated it will run nightly until 10 pm) for the 4,800 tourists staying at the hotel or in a dwelling unit. 6. Loudspeakers projecting above The Wave Pool in all directions are needed for the Wave Pool Announcer to call the 30 second countdown for every single wave with up to 12 waves per hour. The surfer needs to be alerted for the coming Wave, as there is no Ocean to watch or feel until "the big one" comes. A Wave is manufactured every 5 to 6 minutes. The noise level of the Wave crashing has been measured at 75 decibels at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch. This noise level is comparable to the sound of cars traveling on a busy interstate highway. The generators creating the waves will be running non-stop, every day. 7. Plans include Music Stages for Entertainment at each end of The Wave Pool, and other locations in the Resort. 8. In addition to the Wave Pool, there will be more artificial lagoons and lakes for E-Foiling (a motorized hydrofoil paddle board that you stand on, not lie on) and Stand -Up paddle boarding. 9. Concrete sports parks for the Bike park with pump tracks for skateboarding, BMX, and mountain bikes — all with stadium style light towers. 10. Coral Mountain has requested 16 days and nights for Special Events. 16 days is more days than Coachella Fest and Stagecoach combined! To make matters worse, the 16 days are spread out over four 4- day long 53'Page 1 of 3 weekends. Set up and take down for each Special Event Weekend will easily add another 32 days of high traffic conditions. 11. The 80' tall stadium style light towers illuminating The Wave Pool, swimming pools, Skateboard Park, BMX Track, other Sports Courts, acres of parking lots, streets, and 117,000 square feet of Commercial Buildings will be lit inside and out. The spill lighting will affect the surrounding community. No more dark skies. 12. The approval of this project will permanently bring light pollution, noise, and traffic. There will be permanent and on -going noise from the wave generators, breaking waves, the lodgers, guests, loudspeakers and entertainment venues on -site every day until late in the evening. 13. Heavy Construction equipment will be working at 85 decibels or more, non-stop all day long, for the next 10-20 years- (according to Coral Mountain developers own projection). 14. The project will scrape away every inch of" biocrust", creating the need for even more Water Trucks to keep the dust down. "Biocrust "is to the Desert what "Tundra" is to the high elevations. Both tundra and biocrust take many hundreds of years to replace once damaged. Think of the impact on the Deserts already questionable water supply as just 2 years ago we were asked to dramatically cut back on water usage. Demands for water will only increase in future years. 15. This project will forever mar the stunning natural topography of the area, forever erasing the absolute silent evenings and dark skies enjoyed currently by all residents of the area. This Coral Mountain Resort project does not have any of the characteristics of the surrounding low- density up -scale residential neighborhoods. This is a Mega Resort, not a residential neighborhood. This type of development is completely not compatible with any of the surrounding neighborhoods for miles in every direction. City Planners and City Counsel Members, ask yourself, would you want to live next door to a Water Sports- Themed Amusement Park with 80 foot high stadium lighting, noise from concert venues, BMX motor bike racing, and wave machines and traffic 24/7? The approval of the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Amusement Park style Resort will permanently cause the irreplaceable loss of the peaceful, quiet, serene atmosphere that this part of La Quinta is renowned for. Allowing this extremely large Tourist/Commercial Resort into our quiet low- density residential, golf - oriented neighborhoods, will negatively affect every Homeowner for miles around. There will be no coming back. The value of our homes and the quality of life of living and being in the "Quite Zone" of La Quinta will be forever degraded. I urge the City of La Quinta NOT to change the zoning from the current designation Low -Density Residential w/ 18-hole golf course to TOURIST/COMMERCIAL . I urge you not to allow Short Term Vacation Rentals (STVR) and the problems that accompany them. This proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort is exactly the WRONG type of develop for this location. Your are literally planning to drop a tourist amusement park resort in the middle of a quiet residential zone. Please do not allow this project to move forward. Sincerely, Trilogy Resident Robert Lasser 81401 Golden Poppy Way La Quinta, CA 92253 capezio44@san.rr.com 53Tage 2 of 3 �O Virus -free. www.avg.com 53j)age 3 of 3 Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 16:37:38 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 at 2:53:32 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: andrewleeds2357@gmail.com To: LA Quinta City Planner CC: 'Andy G Mail' Attn: Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consultant Planner, City of La Quinta My name is Andrew Leeds and I live at 81639 Andalusia, LA Quinta, VA 92253 I am writing to you in regard to proposed Coral Mountain Resort and the affects and impact it will have on the Andalusia Community and my full time home. There have been many versions of the extent of this project from it being a super high end project with 100K memberships to use the facility to it being open to the public. The hours of operation of the Surfpark feature and the noise, vibration it will cause and lights needed for evening use that it will very much impact our lives being located across the street from the planned site. Below are a few of the issues that concern us most Traffic and visual pollution. This tract was zoned to be a low density residential area (with full golf) and this new proposal will create substantial additional traffic to/from a full-fledged commercial sports complex, hotel, multiple restaurants and higher density residential housing (up to 600 units — many likely short term rentals). The hotel, which was originally presented as two story maximum, is now planned as 4-story and will obstruct view of Coral Mountain from pretty much every residence with that view. Traffic on Madison will increase by many hundreds of vehicles. Noise pollution. The proposed wave equipment generates substantial and constant noise (minimum 75 decibels) that will travel far in the desert and is pretty much as if you are living next to a busy freeway. The developers admit that the wave operation will involve loudspeaker announcement of every wave. Noise pollution should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12 3. Seismic disturbance. The proposed wave equipment by its very nature generates vibration (not to mention the additional seismic disturbance generated by the resulting wave crashing) which will easily travel long distances in the loose desert soil. Pool and jacuzzi leaks for the neighboring properties will not be far behind. Seismic disturbance should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12. 4. Light pollution. This tract is in one of the last unspoiled areas of La Quinta where total darkness survives and our Andalusian observation of the beautiful desert night sky is uncompromised. This project proposes the installation of 80 ft high light poles all along the wave trench to allow for nighttime commercial activity which will likely completely obliterate the night sky. The area where the poles will sit is already about 20ft higher than Andalusia, which increases the likelihood that the emitted light will shine straight into our development. All desert cities have specific and strict rules on light pollution, so how come this can be tolerated by the city planners? And make no mistake, this will be 7 days per week all year long. 5. Quality of life reduction. The hours of operation of this facility have been insufficiently clarified but there is a distinct impression the wave operation may be started as early as 6 in the morning and go well into the night? This should be considered unacceptable in a once 534Page 1 of 2 peaceful residential area where the only disturbance might be an errand golf ball. It totally ignores the original zoning intent for this tract. The zoning change request should be more thoroughly investigated and the change to commercial should be opposed. We hope you take a long hard look at the problems this project will cause the community and not allow the project to proceed as planned. Thank You, Andrew Leeds & Cheryl Porcaro Andrew Leeds and rewleeds2357@gmail.com 213-248-8330 - Cell 535Page 2 of 2 Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 09:37:07 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Plan Date: Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 8:53:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: pllowrim@aol.com To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Contact Information Patti Lowrimore 81674 Prism Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 (760)296-3106 City of La Quinta Consulting Planner and City Council Members: The residents of the City of La Quinta have put their trust in you and I am writing to ask you to consider the effects of the proposed Coral Mountain Resort Plan. I grew up in the Eastern Coachella Valley and have seen many changes through the years. The thought of an artificial wave basin, resort facility and houses being placed in such a pristine area of our desert is troubling. There are few places in the desert where you can see water lines formed on the mountains from so long ago, a dark and clear night sky for gazing at the stars and limited noise and traffic. The proposed plan will do away with all in one fell swoop. I realize change is constant but it needs to be accomplished in a manner that protects the environment and quality of life. Please limit growth and development of our natural desertscape in a responsible manner. That is what I am asking of you. 53EPage 1 of 1 Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 08:48:57 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Date: Saturday, March 6, 2021 at 8:07:04 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Maureen Lunney To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dr. Maureen E. Lunney 12 Meadowglen Circle Kemptville, ON, Canada KOG 1J0 The excessive use of water resources, light and noise pollution, traffic issues and the loss of the quiet characteristics of the neighbourhood all are factors which would make zoning change to tourist unacceptable for this site. If this kind of place is being considered for a desert environment, which for obvious reasons is environmentally ridiculous, it should be out by the Highway #10 in a commercial area. The beauty of the dark and quiet desert nights is a major factor in my visits to The Quarry. This development would certainly make me spend my money elsewhere. Maureen E. Lunney B.Sc., D.V.M. 537Page 1 of 1 Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 12:40:55 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort - Attention Nicole Sauviat Christie Date: Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 12:30:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Stuart MacGregor To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Ms. Christie I am writing with respect to the City of LaQuinta's Notice of Preparation dated February 16, 2021. My wife Colleen Campbell and I own a property at 59235 Seville at the Andalusia Golf Club across the street from the planned development. Last year we attended a presentation arranged by the Andalusia Club in which the developer of the Coral Mountain Resort detailed a number of their plans. The following day we joined a group off Andalusia members and toured the site with one of the representatives of the developer. There were a number of concerns expressed at the first meeting about noise and vibration emanating from the wave machine. Given that this is reasonably new "technology" it was left that the environmental study would address those concerns. That was viewed as reasonable as until third party experts had a chance to weigh in no definitive impact could be quantified given the lack of a track record of successful integration in communities and the particularly unique and untested features of the location to be developed. There was mention of a similar wave machine located in central California so hopefully an accurate assessment of what the impact will be can be developed from such an existing operation. The catalyst for my taking the time to send this note is a concern relating the 80 foot towers noted in the details of the project as submitted to your office. Neither Colleen nor I remember it ever being mentioned as it would most certainly have raised concerns at that time. Towers 80 feet high will be impossible to fit into the consistent low profile and minimal light pollution that is the theme of the general LaQuinta community, and our end of the valley in particular. The inclusion of lighting brings to light an intention for nighttime operations which is an additional consideration. These towers may be an indication that this project will have more of an amusement park feel which seems to be counter to what was initially presented. We hope our perspective is of some help as your group considers this proposal. We believe informed and careful consideration is required to make sure this new project Sent from my iPad 53EPage 1 of 1 Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 07:56:35 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Objection to Coral Mountain Wave Park Development Date: Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 4:35:13 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Tom Margro To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner 78-495 Calle Tampico LaQuinta, CA 92253 March 15,2021 I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort development in La Quinta. I am a resident of the Trilogy La Quinta community which is adjacent to the proposed project. The project is proposed to be located in a currently zoned residential area and is surrounded by several residential communities. This project will dramatically impinge upon and denigrate the residential character of the area. The project includes a wave pool operating at least 12 hours per day, 265 days per year. This facility includes loudspeakers announcing waves every 5 to 6 minutes. It includes 80 foot tall stadium style light towers to illuminate the wave park and surrounding entertainment facilities. The project includes a hotel, dwelling units, restaurants, bars and entertainment venues. in short, this is a huge commercial entertainment complex in the middle of a low density, residential neighborhood area. This project will have severe impacts to the area including light pollution, noise, traffic, visual and negative impacts on property values. Environmental impacts will be significant, affecting water availability and air quality. This project will permanently cause the irreplaceable loss of the peaceful, quiet, serene atmosphere that the area now enjoys. Please do NOT allow this project to move forward. Let us keep the City of La Quinta the beautiful place we have come to love and appreciate. Thankyou Trilogy Resident Thomas Margro 81627 Brittlebush Lane La Quinta, ca 92253 cusefan66@gmail.com 53�Page 1 of 1 04/01/2021 To: Nicole Sauviat Criste, City Planner Attention Ms. Sauviat Criste, I am a homeowner in the Andalusia community and are writing this letter voicing my opposition of the development of the Coral Mountain parcel on Madison between Avenue 58 and Avenue 60. The area of proposed development of the waterpark and housing is on a site that should never be used for this purpose. The City of La Quinta needs to leave this parcel in its natural state. It is an area that is filled with ancient seashells, artifacts, and the historic coral mountain. Defacing this property by approving a waterpark and housing project would be and egregious move on the City's part. The city would be making a statement that revenue is more important than preserving the rare natural environment. Moreover, this development will cause light pollution from the 80-foot light poles illuminating the length of seven to eight football fields. The constant noise from the generators, and traffic would also negatively impact the environment, not to mention adversely impact homeowners in all the surrounding communities. My suggestion for this area is to make it a preserve. Perhaps even a park area like the La Quinta Cove. This would have minimum effects on environment, and humans in the area. Thank you for your time, and positive outcome for this rare and precious area. Thank you, K V;�/� Nancy artin Nancyanderson1@gmail.com 619-417-0407 540 Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 16:06:32 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Fwd: Proposed Wave Park Date: Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 3:48:00 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Rich Martin To: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Rich Martin <richfmartin@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 3:44 PM Subject: Proposed Wave Park To: <consultingplanner@laquinta.gov> Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, Calif. 92253 Ms Criste, I am a four year resident of Andalusia Country Club and moved from Borrego Springs, California. I loved Borrego Springs for it's dark skies, views, tranquility and open space. However, the future outlook for a sustainable water source not only reduced home values, but prompted us and many neighbors to leave the area. We found Andalusia as a location that offered many of Borrego's qualities i.e. dark sky, views etc. We were content with our decision until the recent Wave Park proposal. This proposal was not what we had been presented with at the time of our purchase. My concerns as it relates to the Wave Park are as follows: Sustainable water availability for the La Quinta area given the amount of water to fill the pool and maintain a required level given evaporation in the desert. As I understand, the Lemore wave pool requires 25,000 - 150,000 gallons of "make up water" per day depending on the season for evaporation, runoff and overflow. We must preserve our limited water not sacrifice it for amusement; I believe La Quinta City enforces a dark sky policy. However, the erection of multiple 80 foot towers with light bouncing off the water and mountain does not seem consistent with the policy. The illumination of the surrounding homesites and desert damages the beauty of the desert and endangers wildlife in the area: The solitude of the desert will be eliminated by a wave machine constantly moving from early in the morning until late at night propelled with 150+ truck tires to generate waves. The noise and vibration will bounce off Coral Mountain into surrounding communities. This will be coupled with noise from concerts and loud speakers calling attention to the oncoming wave and participant. Although the Lemore wave pool was to be public, it remains private but offers concerts with 5000 attendees on average, vending spaces and performance centers. In addition, jumbotrons are used for the bleacher crowds . Is that what we can expect; Increased traffic especially during events : 54'Page 1 of 2 Destruction of wildlife habitat and Native American lands; Will the constant vibrations trigger an earthquake; There have been health issues associated with amoeba and bacterial growth in some wave pools. Which agency in La Quinta is responsible for the monitoring of water quality in the pool? Will there be a periodic requirement to flush or replace the water for health reasons. Will this lead to even greater usage of water? La Quinta is a beautiful city to call home. It truly is the jewel of the Coachella Valley and Coral Mountain is the crown jewel. Why would we allow developers to turn a recreational area that is used by the residents of La Quinta into an amusement park for the benefit of a few. Thankyou Richard Martin 54Yage 2 of 2 Monday, March 29, 2021 at 15:08:58 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: La Quinta Wave Park Date: Monday, March 29, 2021 at 1:49:29 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Harold Mauser To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov To: Nicole Sauviat Criste I'm writing to express our position against a wave Park in La quinta next to our community -Trilogy at La Quinta. Lois and I moved here in 2004 for the peace, quiet, and clean air in our retirement years. This area provided that peace and quiet, as well as access to hiking and safe biking areas to keep us healthy. The area planned for the wave park was planned for a golf course and homes. It was part of Andalusia, which has been a quiet neighbor. The wave park will have sound and light pollution, as well as exhaust pollution from the increased traffic. It will also make our streets less safe for riding bicycles, which many of us use for exercise. This increased light, sound, and exhaust pollution, as well as decreased safety, will make our home and surrounding area a less healthy area to live. This is not what we want in our final years on this beautiful earth. Thank you for listening Nicole. I wish the people behind the wave park project all the best. I'm simply asking that they select another location for their wave park, so that our quality of life and health will not deteriorate. Respectfully, Harold "Skip" Mouser Sent from my iPad 54Yage 1 of 1 Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 17:23:16 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Park Development Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 5:12:13 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Russell McKee To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Attn: Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner City of La Quinta, CA Re: Coral Mountain Resort Amendement V Dear Ms. Criste, My name is Russ McKee, one of the newest homeowners at Andalusia Country Club. My wife, Betsy and I fell in love with the ambience of Andalusia, and most especially the peaceful quiet, and beautiful canopy of stars that we enjoy each evening. The views of the Coral Mountains juxtaposed in front of the Santa Rosa Mountains, coupled with the serene beauty and quiet of the desert sky is unequaled. When we first learned of the wave park development, our 35-year-old surfer son was ecstatic and threatened to move in with us! Although the concept seemed novel, when I reviewed the development plan the scope of the project overwhelmed me. I do not support this development on several levels, but most significantly I am concerned about the light pollution from the 80' towers that could spoil the night sky in this area forever. This would be tragic. The City has prudently required an Environmental Impact Report be prepared in compliance with CEQA guidelines. I request that the public comment period for this development be extended 30 days from receipt and distribution of the EIR so everyone can assess the impact this project will have on all our friends and neighbors at Andalusia and surrounding communities. Thank you for your consideration. Best Regards, Russ & Betsy McKee 81-329 Andalusia La Quinta, CA 92253 544Page 1 of 1 Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 09:41:36 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Surf park Date: Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 6:51:19 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: dennis mclatcher To: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov This proposed surfing park before all considerations, needs to do complete reports analyzing the impact on traffic, noise, geological, and environmental effects. The area is primarily residential, retirement and leisure such as golf, walking and biking. I am amazed that anyone would consider this area, since it would destroy the tranquility of the community. There are plenty of less developed land that this amusement park should consider. Dennis McLatcher Sent from my Wad 545Page 1 of 1 Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 08:56:09 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Amendment V Date: Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 8:48:55 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Bob and Dawn McLean To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov March 11, 2021 City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner, consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Ms. Criste: Re: Coral Mountain Resort Amendment V We are residents of Andalusia Country Club. We have lived here for 8 years and very much enjoy the peace, tranquility and beauty of this part of La Quinta both during the day and night. We were alarmed to read that there will be "80 foot light poles installed to illuminate the Wave basin" at this new development. This is directly in our sight lines which will greatly affect the beautiful natural view we presently enjoy in the evening as the sun sets behind the mountains and darkness sets in, at which time the stars appear. We purchased and chose this particular lot at Andalusia for these reasons. The quiet ambiance and tranquil picturesque evenings. We object to this lighting being installed and would like that noted on the record. Below is the excerpt from the document titled: "Coral Mountain Resort Notice of Preparation" Section 4.2.1 "The project proposes a recreational Wave basin, including 80-foot light poles, to illuminate the Wave basin in the evenings. Therefore, potential light and glare impacts to daytime and nighttime views in the area as a result of project development will be analyzed in the EIR." Further, we have heard from people who have seen or been to similar facilities and understand that the sounds generated by the wave producing equipment could carry great distances. This is particularly true in an area such as where we live as we are in a valley surrounded by mountains which could potentially create an echoing affect. Thank you for your consideration Respectfully submitted, Bob and Dawn McLean 81-315 Andalusia La Quinta, CA 92253 (647) 290-3296 dawnmclean56@gmail.com (416) 903-4653 bobmclean205@gmail.com 54EPage 1 of 1 To Whom It May Concern: We join the residents of Trilogy and Andalusia in expressing our deep concerns of the proposed Wave Park to be built across the street from Coral Mountain Estates, a community we have recently moved to in mid -September from the New York City metropolitan area. Our concerns are numerous in opposition to this proposal. Primarily the addition of such an "attraction" will fundamentally change the essence of what La Quinta is as a city. In our opinion, La Quinta exemplifies sophistication, elegance, and understatement. It is where people come, and have come in the past, to get away from the noise and fast moving tempo of their normal lives. This has been true for a very long time as is evident with the construction of the quintessential La Quinta Resort in 1926. The impact of Wave Park in La Quinta in general, and to the proposed area in particular would be extremely detrimental. The residential communities surrounding the proposed area have a serenity and tranquility that would most certainly be disrupted by the noise and traffic. Please look at the images of the Wave Water Park in Vista, California to see the density of visitors. Inevitably, management will strive to increase revenue with the frequency of events such as special parties and galas during the day and night which will bring in louder and bigger crowds and louder music. After reviewing the site plan, the location of the mountains to the southwest and south of the Wave Park will project and amplify to the north and northeast any sound generated and directly impact the existing nearby residential communities. No amount of landscaping or buffering would be able to absorb the noise impact on these surrounding communities. We believe at this moment, La Quinta is standing at the crossroads. Is this the image that the residents of La Quinta are willing to embrace whatever the tax revenue benefits would be generated by this addition. In our opinion, this is too high a price to pay. We believe this would tarnish the well -deserved image of La Quinta as a classy city. We urge you to please stop the proposal for the construction of the Wave Park in La Quinta. Thanking you in advance for your thoughtful consideration. Claudia and John Menser Homeowners, Coral Mountain Estates info@aanwinc.com 212-737-3766 917-584-0189 547 Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 08:48:12 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Attention Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste - RE: LQ wave park proposal Coral Mountain Resort Date: Saturday, March 6, 2021 at 3:53:17 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Rob Michiels To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: mgacharles@yahoo.com, Sarah Nielsen, Ria Michiels, Pascal Apotheloz (papotheloz@dre- eng.com) Attachments: Public Notice - Coral Mountain Resort NOP.pdf, Coral Mountain Resort Notice of Preparation Document.pdf Dear Ms Sauviat Criste, It has recently come to my attention that the referenced project is still being reviewed by the city. We live in the adjacent Andalusia housing development (original owner of the tract in question) and our property will have a direct line of sight on the proposed wave park. We would like to strongly object to this development based on the following elements (all of which are actually described in one way or another in your notice of preparation). 1. Light pollution. This tract is in one of the last unspoiled areas of La Quinta where total darkness survives and observation of the beautiful desert night sky is uncompromised. This project proposes the installation of 80 ft high light poles to allow for nighttime commercial activity which will likely completely obliterate the night sky. Since the area where the poles will sit is already 20ft higher, the emitted light will shine straight into our development. I have always been under the impression that all desert cities have specific and strict rules on light pollution? 2. Traffic pollution. This tract was meant to be a fairly low density residential area (with full golf) and this proposal would create substantial additional traffic to/from a commercial sports complex, hotel, multiple restaurants and higher density residential housing. 3. Noise pollution. The proposed wave equipment generates substantial noise that will travel far in the desert. Noise pollution should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.1. 4. Seismic disturbance. The proposed wave equipment by its very nature generates vibration (not to mention the additional seismic disturbance generated by the resulting wave chrashing) which will easily travel long distances in the loose desert soil. Seismic disturbance should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.1. 5. Quality of life reduction. The hours of operation of this facility have been insufficiently clarified but there is a distinct impression the wave operation may be started as early as 6 in the morning and go well into the night? This should be considered unacceptable in a once peaceful residential area where the only disturbance might be an errand golf ball. Thank you for consideration of my comments. Sincerely, Rob Michiels Rob & Ria Michiels 81301 Andalusia La Quinta, CA 92253 Mailing address: 54EPage 1 of 2 114 Via Toluca San Clemente, CA 92672 Cell + 1949 677 4165 Email rmichiels@consiliumassociates.net Mike Charles All: I asked to be on the city's permitting process notification list for the wave park. I received a DVD at my house in Wa. I was able to download onto my computer to be able to resend via email. Please note the 80 foot high lighting towers found in Section: 4.2.1 "Aesthetics" page 31. Deadline for submission to comment is March 19. The city's email to send your comments to is: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Thanks, Mike Mike Charles mgacharles@yahoo. com cell: 253-381-4565 549�age 2 of 2 Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 08:47:53 Pacific Standard Time Subject: RE: Attention Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste - RE: LQ wave park proposal Coral Mountain Resort Date: Saturday, March 6, 2021 at 3:56:51 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Rob Michiels To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Correction to my points 3 and 4; Section 4.2.12 From: Rob Michiels Sent: Saturday, March 6, 2021 3:53 PM To:'consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov' <consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov> Cc: 'mgacharles@yahoo.com'<mgacharles@yahoo.com>;'Sarah Nielsen' <sarah.nielsen@mecom>; Ria Michiels <michiels.ria@gmail.com>; Pascal Apotheloz (papotheloz@dre-eng.com) <papotheloz@dre- eng.com> Subject: Attention Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste - RE: LQ wave park proposal Coral Mountain Resort Dear Ms Sauviat Criste, It has recently come to my attention that the referenced project is still being reviewed by the city. We live in the adjacent Andalusia housing development (original owner of the tract in question) and our property will have a direct line of sight on the proposed wave park. We would like to strongly object to this development based on the following elements (all of which are actually described in one way or another in your notice of preparation). 1. Light pollution. This tract is in one of the last unspoiled areas of La Quinta where total darkness survives and observation of the beautiful desert night sky is uncompromised. This project proposes the installation of 80 ft high light poles to allow for nighttime commercial activity which will likely completely obliterate the night sky. Since the area where the poles will sit is already 20ft higher, the emitted light will shine straight into our development. I have always been under the impression that all desert cities have specific and strict rules on light pollution? 2. Traffic pollution. This tract was meant to be a fairly low density residential area (with full golf) and this proposal would create substantial additional traffic to/from a commercial sports complex, hotel, multiple restaurants and higher density residential housing. 3. Noise pollution. The proposed wave equipment generates substantial noise that will travel far in the desert. Noise pollution should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.1. 4. Seismic disturbance. The proposed wave equipment by its very nature generates vibration (not to mention the additional seismic disturbance generated by the resulting wave chrashing) which will easily travel long distances in the loose desert soil. Seismic disturbance should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.1. 5. Quality of life reduction. The hours of operation of this facility have been insufficiently clarified but there is a distinct impression the wave operation may be started as early as 6 in the morning and go well into the night? This should be considered unacceptable in a once peaceful residential area where the only disturbance might be an errand golf ball. Thank you for consideration of my comments. Sincerely, Rob Michiels 55(Page 1 of 2 Rob & Ria Michiels 81301 Andalusia La Quinta, CA 92253 Mailing address: 114 Via Toluca San Clemente, CA 92672 Cell + 1949 677 4165 Email rmichiels@consiliumassociates.net Mike Charles All: I asked to be on the city's permitting process notification list for the wave park. I received a DVD at my house in Wa. I was able to download onto my computer to be able to resend via email. Please note the 80 foot high lighting towers found in Section: 4.2.1 "Aesthetics" page 31. Deadline for submission to comment is March 19. The city's email to send your comments to is: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Thanks, Mike Mike Charles mgacharles@yahoo. corn cell: 253-381-4565 55-Page 2 of 2 Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 09:22:12 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Zoning of water park Date: Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 4:03:53 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Sharon Nigro To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste My husband and I recently moved to the development of Andalusia this fall. Last year I suffered a heart attack, my husband retired and we felt we needed peace, quiet and safety especially during Covid-19. It has been a lifesaver living in a low impact residential area. We had no idea the zoning is due to change and there is going to be a water park in the future. This will bring large crowds, high noise levels, traffic. Everything we left behind. This project should not go forward. Thank you for any assistance in this matter. Sharon Nigro 18644 Andalusia La Quinta, California 92253 310-270-6913 Kbunkbch@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone 55Tage 1 of 1 TO: City of La Quinta FROM: Bridgett & Philip Novak DATE: 3/31/2021 RE: Coral Mountain proposed Wavepark development We are homeowners in Andalusia. We are VERY concerned about the proposed Wavepark development. We attended yesterday's Zoom Scope Meeting and want to echo ALL of the concerns expressed by our La Quinta neighbors. Notice that not one person showed up in support of the project. And we are confident that the people who did attend represent just a small percentage of the thousands living in the surrounding residential developments who also oppose the project. We feel we must point out that the categories scheduled to be addressed in the EIR omit several very important issues. For instance, LIGHT POLLUTION. Why, oh why, isn't this being addressed? For the developers to casually claim that their 80-foot towers will have "directional" lights pointed towards the water is totally insufficient. A) How many light towers will there be? B) A study needs to be conducted with actual water and a backdrop of a rock -wall mountain (like Coral Mountain) to determine how much deflected light will bounce off the water and the mountains... and from how far away the light towers and their bulbs will be visible. Our home is deep within Andalusia and we can see the entire face of Coral Mountain from our backyard. Those light towers and their bulbs will now be visible. That is NOT acceptable. C) What about other lights throughout the development? There are walking paths, outdoor dining/entertainment areas, bike paths, homes, a hotel, a restaurant, etc. planned for this project. All will have outdoor lighting that has to be measured and evaluated. D) Are there going to be big screens (aka jumbotrons) showing surfers every day the wave basin is open and entertainers for their special events? Those light emissions will also have to be evaluated. The ability to see surrounding mountains, palm trees, and the night sky is a HUGE part of what makes La Quinta the "gem of the desert". This is a very serious issue and MUST be studied in the EIR process. Other topics that MUST be added to the EIR are: 1) FLOOD RISK — how does the addition of a 20-acre, 18-million-gallon basin of water impact the flood risk / insurance costs of the surrounding residential communities? 2) THE EFFECT OF COACHELLA VALLEY'S STRONG WINDS — this effect needs to be studied in relation to the water in the wave basin, to the wave -making machinery, to the tall public announcement and light towers, to equipment that would be negatively impacted by blowing wind and sand. Water usage is on the EIR list, but we want to add a strenuous endorsement to Diane Rebryna's presentation about the HUGE amounts of water required by a wave basin, the evaporation concerns and the fact that the developer intends to tap into the aquifer which supplies the drinking water for Coachella Valley residents... likely affecting its quality and quantity. As they say in Texas, where one of us is from, "Don't mess with my water!" 553 Did you know that this project plans to create "the biggest, rideable open barrel, human -made waves in the world" (see https://wavepoolmag.com/califomia-desert-updates-surf-parks-still- target-2022-23-launch/) and "the world's largest manmade waves" (see https://www.travelandleisure. com/trip-ideas/yoga-wellness/kelly-slater-coral-mountain-wave- >l 0-1) As other speakers pointed out, how can this HUGE amount of water usage (we're not even counting the water used by the private homes, hotel, restaurant, landscaping, etc.) be contemplated for a BIG project when the city, county and state are asking ALL residents and businesses to conserve? Even the golf courses around here are urged to recycle and/or use reclaimed water. What is Coral Mountain's developer being asked to do? We also believe the developer is far too cavalier with regard to NOISE concerns. It is really laughable that the developer points to casual noise studies they conducted at Lemoore. As Kathy Weiss said, "that's apples and oranges". First of all, Lemoore is surrounded by flat agricultural fields and no residential developments. They apparently intend to build this wave basin right up against Coral Mountain. Noises created in that basin will echo off the rock face and reverberate far and wide!!! And today's presentation didn't even talk about the grinding sound of the train - like rail system that moves back and forth or the hydrafoils that help create the waves. And what about the tower where the Public Announcer sits and from where he/she broadcasts upcoming waves, musical choices, safety warnings, etc.? It will be a public announcement system with loud speakers! Funny that the drawings shown today did NOT even show that tower ... or address the NOISE and public eyesore that will be created by it. And what about the jet ski(s)? Those weren't mentioned in the presentation either!! Their own description of how their wave basin operates describes at least one jet ski full-time to run surfers back to the beginning of the wave experience. The above -mentioned "Travel & Leisure" article says the basin will accommodate 25 surfers at a time... so there will have to be multiple jet skis ferrying surfers back & forth and available for emergencies. And there will likely be other jet ski -type devices in the water, too, to rescue people who are injured and to take photographs of the surfers (since everyone will, no doubt, want a visual memory of their experience... and which will likely be another way for the developers to make money). Utilities are on the EIR, but we'd like to ask if the project's need for huge amounts of continuous power will affect the cost, availability and/or dependability of electricity, water, gas, Internet and WiFi in surrounding residential communities and if the current IID facility on Avenue 58 will have to be expanded — and thus be noisier — which will negatively impact the PGA -Legends and Andalusia neighborhoods in particular (we already hear noise from that facility whenever they have any kind of construction/expansion project taking place, including just paving the parking lot, making roof repairs, etc.). Also on the EIR list, and worthy of expert, in-depth analysis is a thorough SOIL STUDY / SEISMIC ACTIVITY / HYDROLOGY / GEOLOGY report, addressing among other things, questions like how could local quakes impact the wave basin and alluvial soil of the Coral 554 Mountain landscape and how will the wave basin's machinery and continuous pounding impact local foundations, pools & soil stability. We're also concerned about a possible conflict of interest by the "consultant" working on the EIR. She introduced herself as Michelle during the Zoom meeting and said she'd be preparing the EIR for the City. Apparently, she is with MSA Consultants. But who was the man who described the development? Is he also with MSA Consultants? Or is he with Meriweather? As Anast Demitt stated, experts in the various areas that need to be studied for this project should be the ones preparing the EIR ... NOT a "consultant" who works for a company that is skilled at getting projects approved by cities. MSA appears to have a preferred outcome. There is not nearly enough "third party, independent" expertise at the table or being brought into this process! There were LOTS of VERY important issues brought up yesterday... and ALL of them deserve careful study, analysis and review BEFORE wasting more public money on any further consideration of this project. As many said, the City is likely to face many lawsuits at every stage of this project, so PLEASE take everything said today seriously... and push the timeline out in order to make sure ALL of these issues are adequately and thoroughly considered by independent analysts/experts. This project should NOT be approved as currently planned!! Please add us to the list to receive ALL updates about this project. Thank you, Bridgett & Phil Novak 58235 Carmona La Quinta, CA 92253 Bnovak26@comcast.net novak@dominican.edu 555 Friday, April 2, 2021 at 11:45:37 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: RE: Coral Mountain project Date: Friday, April 2, 2021 at 11:05:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: bnovak26@comcast.net To: 'Consulting Planner' CC: 'Philip Novak' Hello Nicole, We would like the following to be added to our submission... and we hope that everyone at the City views this video, too. The following video is from a party held at Kelly Slater's Surf Ranch in Lemoore, CA. After a full day (starting at daybreak) of surfing, and a music -filled outdoor party, all the surfers went back in the basin, along with the jet ski(s) and music, to surf at night. NOTICE HOW MANY LIGHT POLES THERE ARE ... ALONG THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF THE BASIN ... AND THAT THE LIGHT POLES ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BASIN ... AND THAT THERE APPEAR TO BE LIGHTS ON THE "TRAIN TRACK" TOO. The NIGHT portion of the video starts at 34:00. The LIGHT POLES can be seen best at 34:25 and 34:42. http.a://wavepoolmag.com outubed-vlog-elite-descend-on-kel lys-wave-for-birthday-fete/ Thank you. Bridgett & Philip Novak From: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 20214:04 PM To: bnovak26@comcast.net Cc: 'Philip Novak' <novak@dominican.edu> Subject: Re: Coral Mountain project Mr. and Mrs. Novak, Thank you for your comments. They will be included in the EIR Notice of Preparation comments for the project. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 55EPage 1 of 2 From: bnovak26@comcast.net <bnovak26@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 3:58 PM To: Consulting Planner<ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Cc:'Philip Novak' <novak@dominican.edu> Subject: Coral Mountain project EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Hello, We are La Quinta homeowners and are submitting the attached letter for the City to add to its review of the proposed wavepark project at Coral Mountain. Thank you, Bridgett & Philip Novak 58235 Carmona La Quinta, CA 92253 Bnovak26@comcast.net novak@dominican.edu 557Page 2 of 2 ++35 Philkrook Square San Diego, California 92150 31520 Carkonera, La Quinta, California 92255 March 23, 2021 Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta 74-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Re: Coral Mountain Resort Development (CMR) Dear Ms Sauviat Criste: I am writing to you concerning the development of the Coral Mountain Resort Development (CMR) across Madison Avenue from my home in Andalusia at Coral Mountain. We chose our home for the beauty of our valley, the mountains and desert vistas. We love the privacy and quiet life afforded by our country club and community of our neighbors. Now it seems we have a transient resort developing across Madison Avenue which has the potential of polluting this desert ambience in too many ways. For example, we appreciate the "sound of silence" afforded by our distance from downtown and Hwy 111. In past rare evenings there brought the sound of drum -beats from the Coachella Music and Arts Festival four miles away. This was charming, rather than noisome. It was rare. Now I fear we may be attacked by daily music and announcements from the Wave Park planned in the CMR development across the street. Not rare, and certainly no charm. Our view of the Coral Mountain to the west apparently may be marred by a four-story hotel uglifying our desert view of Coral Mountain. The "bait and switch" proposals counter the presentation given by the developers last year to our Andalusia homeowners. How about the 80-foot lights, apparently planned to illuminate the wave park, backed up against the Coral Mountain beyond, surly a challenge to the developer's EIR. Our view of the Indio Mountains across 558 the valley was recently marred by construction of the 5-G tele-com munitions tower constructed behind our homes to the north. Everyone mentions the potential traffic problems in our neighborhood. I am realistic about development in our valley. But it must continue in a responsible fashion. Responsible commercial development should respect neighbors and respect our environment. It is called comity. I challenge the City Council to amend the Coral Mountain Resort Notice of Preparation such that the mammon of a few does not trump tangible and intangible losses to near -by rest. The decision of the City Council will affect our neighborhood and Clty for many decades to come. It will influence development in the southern portion of our city for generations. Kenneth Ott, M.D., F.A.C.S. Mirta Ott, R.N. 81520 Carboneras La Quinta, CA 92215 619 990 3320 kennott@gmail.com 559 Tuesday, March 16, 2021 at 06:40:52 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave Park Date: Monday, March 15, 2021 at 5:45:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Karen To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Nicole, My name is Karen Owen. I have lived in Trilogy for ten years now and was planning to retire here. I am hoping that I am not forced by the City of La Quinta to move elsewhere because they approved this horrific wave park. I have been going to write you for a while now and just today drove home from a doctors appointment in Palm Desert. The wind and terrible dust blowing around the Silverock area was terrible. This was just a "once in a while occurrence ". If this wave park is approved to be built we will have to put up with this horrendous dust for ten years. There are many additional reasons to not change the zoning and permit this project! I am sure that you have heard them all from the loud noises, increased traffic, and many many other reasons that this project should be denied. There is much better land and accessible places to build this down by the 10 freeway without disturbing the existing residents here. Thank you for listening to me! Karen Owen 81885 Sun Cactus Lane La Quinta, Ca 92253 408 832 0878 karen.owenl@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone 56(Page 1 of 1 Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 11:00:51 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Development Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 9:15:15 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Eva Parker To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Ms. Nicole Cristi, We want to express our strong opposition to the planned Coral Mountain Development and Wave Park. My husband and I moved to La Quinta and purchased our retirement home here in a 55 and over community so we could enjoy our final years in peace and quiet. We specifically purchased in Trilogy La Quinta as it was far away from the hustle and bustle and traffic of the downtown area. We anticipated other housing developments and hotels would eventually be built in the surrounding open spaces, but we never imagined a Tourist/Commercially-zoned mega resort with a Wave Machine, professional competitions, and entertainment stages would be built a few blocks from our quiet retirement community. This is so unfair to the surrounding homeowners who moved here expecting a quiet and peaceful environment. We ask that you please put yourself in our place and vote against this project as it is currently planned. Thank you for your consideration. Eva Parker 60162 Angora Court La Quinta, CA 92253 714-814-1973 56-Page 1 of 1 Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 10:09:30 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: PROPOSED WAVE PARK ACROSS FROM ANDALUSIA Date: Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 10:03:11 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Tony Perone To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Ms Criste, am concerned about the proposed wave park that is being considered to be built across the street from Andalusia. My concerns are, but not limited to, the Light Pollution, tremendous increase in traffic, also noise pollution which is something Andalusia residents should not have to deal with. To even consider allowing a wave/water park to be inserted in the middle of any residential area is ludicrous. I ask that you and the city council reconsider this plan to disrupt our community. I'm sure there are many other locations this wave park could be built with no disturbances at all to any residents. Come on, it's the desert! Tony Perone 58440 Mijas La Quinta 626-926-0600 562Page 1 of 1 John S. Perry 81796 Rustic Canyon Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 Isperry760@gmai1.com March 6, 2021 Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, Ca. 92253 Subject: In Support of Coral Mountain Resort We are writing in support of the proposal by The Meriwether Companies to develop vacant land west of Andalusia between Avenues 58 and 60. We have been homeowners in Trilogy since 2007 and full-time residents of La Quinta since 2017. We have reviewed Meriwether's proposals for the property as they have been submitted to the city, as the city clerk's office can verify. Here are our reasons for supporting this project: • Meriwether Companies has a well-earned reputation for building quality developments in Southern California and other regions. We've been particularly impressed with the developer's outreach to residents through informal briefings, site tours and responses to emails and phone calls. • The proposal for Coral Mountain would support property values for this part of the city by providing a nearby high -end community of residences, a boutique hotel and small commercial stores. • Developing these 377 acres would significantly reduce the amount of dust that affects Trilogy and would provide this stretch of Madison Avenue with a welcome facelift. • The surf -oriented environment and artificial wave pool are in keeping with the city's stated vision "to preserve La Quinta's vibrant community through enhanced amenities, exceptional quality of life, full spectrum housing supply, and a robust, year-round economic base; that will act as a beacon to the community for the future." • Coral Mountain is a venture that, with SilverRock, will allow La Quinta to market itself as a destination market for more than golfers. This is critical for post -pandemic tourism as drive -to destinations become more popular. Some Trilogy homeowners are opposed to the plan. Here are our responses to some of the concerns they have expressed to us and on social media: 563 • A "surf park" is not consistent with the character of this part of the city where there are "retirement communities." While many residents chose to retire here -- including the two of us -- many of us were drawn to this area's abundance of outdoor activities. We're not living in nursing homes -- yet. • A "surf park" will bring too much traffic and too many people making too much noise. These are assumptions. The city's review process will determine whether the city's standards for traffic and noise are met. Evidence, not conjecture should rule. The density of Coral Mountain -- residences and hotel rooms -- is half that of Trilogy. Meriwether has assured residents of Trilogy and neighboring communities that the wave basin is reserved for residents and guests, not the general public. That is stated in the Specific Plan as submitted, with limited exceptions for special events. • Construction activity will bring trucks to our streets and kick up dust. True, but construction activity is subject to city regulation and eventually ends. The dust and pollen kicked up from 377 acres of vacant land has no expiration date. • We'll lose the "public" trails to Coral Mountain. The property is already private and marked with "No Trespassing" signs. We look forward to the city's review of the Specific Plan and public hearings down the road. Regards, 564 Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 09:39:29 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral mountain wave park Date: Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 9:19:41 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Marc Pinkus To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov As a resident of Andalusia for the past 10 years, I strongly object to the proposed Wave park planned for Coral mountain across the street. How on earth would the City even consider this? The zoning change alone raises many concerns , are the developers in your pockets? I was under the impression La Quinta is a progressive city, with forward and fair thinking leaders, which is why I chose to live here. Let's hope common sense prevails before it's too late. The initial plan put forward last year in no way resembles what is being proposed now.... I suspect another attempt by the developers to sneak this by. Please consider all the negatives associated with this project, they far outweigh the positives of which there are none. Marc Pinkus, 58306 Aracena, La Quinta. 613-360-3095 Get Outlook for iOS 565Page 1 of 1 Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 12:48:07 Pacific Standard Time Subject: La Quinta Surf Park Resort Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 12:40:11 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Peter Plaza To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov, Peter Plaza, Maria Plaza Hello, My name is Pete Plaza and I'm a homeowner in Trilogy at La Quinta. My unbiased comments below come from 40 years of experience in the development and construction industry. I trust many of my comments are being considered by City officials, planners, developer and EIR responses, and are not in any order, priority or choosing sides as to what/who is right and wrong. Typically, when a project has gotten to this point the dice have been rolled and the game moves forward regardless of what the opposition has to say. It seems that the City has made the decision that there are NO ALTERNATE LOCATIONS for the Surf Park Development in La Quinta or for that matter, the entire Coachella Valley? One would wonder why all the open acreage that is visible throughout the Coachella Valley is not an alternate consideration, especially along Interstate 10, where the property is already zone for this type of development, and more importantly, no major issues with the EIR Report, certainly to a lesser degree..... NO, the City of La Quinta chooses to put this development right in the middle of multi -million dollar homes and in proximity to some of the most beautiful golf courses in the nation. I and others in the surrounding communities are at a total loss as to why this location has been chosen and no other locations are acceptable? As stated earlier, the train has left the station and picking up speed. Can the residents surrounding this development stop this project... absolutely! Below are my construction "gotcha" impacts that everyone will experience, should the project move forward. These "gotcha's" must be a topic of discussion at future meetings and address EIR comments: CONSTRUCTION 1. Tranquility in the community ...... not for 10 years! Constructing a major development of 377 acres is no easy task, nor does is it come without impacts to the surrounding community. There will be lots of heavy construction equipment, dirt trucks with tandem (pups), cranes, bulldozers, supply trucks, tradesman vehicles, and the list goes on and on. This constant and increased flow of vehicle traffic on our roadways will cause noise, diesel fumes, disruption to local traffic, increase in potential accidents/injuries, airborne dust, pollution, smog, loud -speaker noise from construction activities (safety meetings), and overall general construction noise. This will be the "NEW NORMAL" for our local communities many years to come. 2. It's important to point -out that one of the biggest nemesis for any construction project is DUST, especially so when a large parcel of land is being cleared, grubbed, and excavated. Due to the prevailing winds our communities experience in a westerly to easterly direction, DUST will be driven towards Trilogy at La Quinta and Andalusia. This is always a daunting task for the construction crews, and in the case of the Surf Resort Development, it will not be an exception. Yes, the developer will use water trucks to wet -down the dry -soil surface, but they will not have enough water trucks to cover 377 acres in a short period of time, nor can they cover 100% of the development due to inaccessibility. There is no -doubt wind driven dust will occur during construction and considering the development will be done in "phases", this problem will be permanent throughout the entire 10-year duration. 56EPage 1 of 4 3. The first impact the community will experience are the tandem dirt trucks. There are 377 acres in the development. Assuming an average 1-foot cut of organic soil exported off -site (some topsoil will be reused) and 2-foot of engineered fill imported on -site, and the site is a balanced cut and fill calculation. Assume an average dump truck carries 14 cubic yards of dirt and (30 cubic yards with a tandem carrier). a. 377 acres x 43,560 sf. x 3.0 ft. / 30 cubic yards per tandem dump truck = That's approximately 1,650,000 tandem trucks on our local roadways, spanned over 10 years: 165,000 tandem truck each year, or 13,750 tandem dump trucks each month! 4. It's important to ask, "what is the truck route for these trucks? Who is buying the dirt? What is the destination of that dumpsite? Is the truck route on Jefferson, or 58th Street to Madison? 5. Tandem trucks drop residual dirt, stones, and rocks from the rear of the truck. The developer's solution to this is using road sweepers. Truck hauling operation will begin early morning. The road sweepers will be hard at work starting at 6:30AM and clean Jefferson and/or 58th Street. Like any dirt hauling operation, it's not perfect, so residual dirt and gravel will remain on the roadways leaving an obvious patch of travel in its wake. 6. Road damage will occur from the quantity and weight of the dirt trucks over the 10 years. This will require major repairs to the roadways. The damage will not be continuous, so repairs will be done by "patching" segments of the roadway resulting in changing the aesthetic appearance of a continuous and smooth asphalt road to multiple patches (change in color) and the possibility of the asphalt cracking, breaking apart and causing "potholes". The City will be left with patching the potholes with cold -asphalt patch which is only a temporary solution. Over -time, vehicle will loosen -up the cold -asphalt patch, causing another pothole and the process repeats itself. This is a classic repair process due to city budget constraints. Bottomline, our roadways will never look the same. A typical solution to counter -act this issue is requiring the developer to put a Roadway Bond in place, should the City need the funds to repair the roadways in the future. Multiple utility connections will be required for this development, requiring roadways to be closed at Jefferson, 58th Street and 60th Street and local traffic re-routed to Monroe Street. Again, cutting -up the existing asphalt roadways will be required and patched. The City must include "entitlements" in the agreement with the developer to remove the existing asphalt roadways, by scarifying the top layer of the roadways and installing a "new" paved surface. This needs to be applied to all the roadways affected on Jefferson, 58th Street, 60th Street and Monroe. 8. Parking for all construction vehicles must be maintained on the development site and not outside the construction fence line. 9. Will the developer "guarantee" and be fully liable for any impact to the aquifer water supply and/or disruptions to the water supply serving residents? If not, there should be! SURF RESORT DEVELOPMENT AND OPERATION 1. Many of the operational issues have been brought to the table that need to be address in the EIR and forth -coming meeting. Consider this: Let's look down at this development from 5,000 feet, getting the full perspective of what the community will look like and experience once an event is in full operation: a. All the roadways converging to this parcel of land, surrounded by beautiful, serene 56 r-Page 2 of 4 residential communities and golf courses will be backed -up with cars coming from Interstate 10, Highway 111, Jefferson Street, Madison Street, Monroe Street, 58th Street, 60th Street and alternate roads snaking through and avoiding the traffic jam. There will police vehicles and flashing light everywhere, attempting to control traffic with barricades and traffic policeman. Any local resident that needs to do normal shopping along the Highway 111 corridor may find it easy to leave their communities but will face the wrath of traffic jams on every available artery roadway coming back home. IT WILL TAKE YOU HOURS TO RETURN! The community residents will have no other choice but to stay at home until all the event spectators have entered the Surf Resort parking area. Of course, the reverse will occur once the event is finished. b. The EIR refers to off -site parking and a shuttle service will be transporting spectators to and from the parking lot to the event. What happened to the developers plan to provide all the necessary parking stalls for the permanent residents, temporary residents, hotel guests, event staff, surfing professionals/participants, security personnel, NBC media personnel, etc., etc., etc.? OH! BY THE WAY, WHERE IS THIS PARKING LOT LOCATED? c. All the local shopping centers will be consumed by event spectators, making shopping a very unpleasant experience. d. Alcohol will be consumed at tremendous quantities, thus creating other problems: drunk and disorderly individuals, fighting and attacks to individuals, traffic accidents, injuries because of alcohol, late night parties, loudspeaker music, shouting, screaming and police and ambulance sirens responding to these occurrences. As far as the residents are concerned, we will be facing the full effect of this development every time there's an event well into the future. e. Re -Zoning for this development will create a "slippery slope" for allowing other developments in the area. So, it's OK to allow the City of La Quinta to surround Trilogy at La Quinta with commercial developments? I don't think so! My wife and I were planning to retire in Trilogy at La Quinta the rest of our lives. This development may change that if approved. PROPERTY APPRECIATION 1. There has been a lot of discussions concerning the impact the Surf Resort Development will have on the home values in the surrounding communities. I for one, don't believe home prices will increase soon, certainly until the development is complete and what the full affect this facility will have on the sale of homes during "disclosure". Potential buyers looking at Trilogy at La Quinta and Andalusia are +55 seniors are looking for a quiet neighborhood to retire. They will not buy a home that puts them in the same high -congestion environment they came from. The potential buyers will know that this facility is under construction (if approved), and what it brings to the local communities when it's fully operational. Will this resort force potential buyers to look elsewhere? If I was looking to buy in Trilogy at La Quinta, I would have seriously considered this Surf Resort as a negative and looked elsewhere. 2. If there will be property appreciation, when will it happen? How much, and at what price do we pay for this appreciation? Is it worth it? CONCLUSION I ask again, why has the City of La Quinta approved this development in our neighborhood when there are many other locations, such as Interstate 10, to consider that are zoned for this type of 56EPage 3 of 4 development, environmental affects are minimal, and will give the developer improved visibility and marketing attraction? It's beyond my comprehension why this isn't the case. Relocating this facility gives the residents peace -of -mind and develops trust in those City officials we elected, to make sure the City of La Quinta maintains the highest standard of living and that a balance of community is always maintained. Thank you. Peter W. Plaza Trilogy at La Quinta Resident Sent from Mail for Windows 10 56g�age 4 of 4 Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 15:50:12 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Fw: "The Inertia" Magazine Article (Correction) Date: Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 12:34:38 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: pwayneplaza@yahoo.com To: Consulting Planner, Monika Radeva, Terra Nova Planning & Research CC: Kathy Weiss, Bob Lasser, Karen Owen, Ilan Ben -David, Anast Demitt, Lew Gleason, Nancy Bruce, Kathleen Bogan, Dale Tyerman, Diane Rebryna, Bob Ouellette, Carol Jensen, Carolyn Winnor, Kelly Welton, Derek Wong, Sheila Warren, Lori Kilburn, Coleen Coger, Alena Callimanis, Bobbie Fleury, Jeanne Chalfont, Ron Coffee, Virginia Nelson Nicole and Monika, CORRECTION: "This article will be read verbatim at the Tuesday Scoping Meeting." Regards, Pete Plaza (949) 835-2993 ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: pwayneplaza@yahoo.com <pwayneplaza@yahoo.com> To: Consulting Planner <consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov>; Monika Radeva <mradeva@laquintaca.gov>; admin@terranovaplanning.com <admin@terranovaplanning.com> Cc: Kathy Weiss <kathy@crystalspringsranch.co>; Bob Lasser <capezio44@san.rr.com>; Karen Owen <karen.owen1 @gmail.com>; Ilan Ben -David <ilan.bendavid@gmail.com>; Anast Demitt <anast.demitt@proton mail. com>; Lew Gleason <lewatduke@gmail.com>; Nancy Bruce <nbruce@me.com>; Kathleen Bogan <kathleenbogan@me.com>; Dale Tyerman <dalekarent@aol.com>; Diane Rebryna <drebryna@telusplanet.net>; Bob Ouellette <rkouellette@gmail.com>; Carol Jensen <Igtampico@yahoo.com>; Carolyn Winnor <cwinnor@dc.rr.com>; Kelly Welton <kelwelrt@gmail.com>; Derek Wong <derekwong745@yahoo.com>; Sheila Warren <sheilawarren25@yahoo.com>; Lori Kilburn <lori.kilburn92@gmail.com>; Coleen Coger <cccoger@yahoo.com>; Alena Callimanis <acallimanis@gmail.com>; Bobbie Fleury <bobbie@fleury.ty>; Jeanne Chalfont <jeannenoel@gmail.com>; Ron Coffee <ron@jdcoffee.com>; Virginia Nelson <vmn813@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021, 12:17:39 PM PDT Subject: "The Inertia" Magazine Article Nicole and Monika, Our Group would like to submit this to you and formally add it to comments you are receiving in Opposition to the Surf Wave Park. This article will be written verbatim at the Tuesday Scoping Meeting. We have allocated the appropriate amount of time. Please make copies of this article and copy all applicable City Officials, developer and others. Surfrider Europe Takes a Stance on Wave Pools: It's Just Not That Into Them I The Inertia 57(Page 1 of 2 -A Surfrider Europe Takes a Stance on Wave Pools: It's Just Not That Into T... Alexander Haro Surfrider Europe releases wave pool statement Regards, Pete Plaza (949) 835-2993 57'Page 2 of 2 Surfrider Europe Takes a Stance on Wave Pools: It's Just Not That Into ... https://www.theinertia.com/surf/surfrider-europe-wave-pools-environmen... l r c E k E c SURF (HTTPS://W W W.TH EINERTIA.COM/CATEGORY/SURF/) Surfrider Europe Takes a Stance on Wave Pools: It's Just Not That Into Them TUESDAY AUGUST 18, 2020 -9 Illexande Haro (https://www.theinertia.com/autbor/alexander-baro/J Senior Editor STAFF O(https://www.instagram.com/alexanderpeterharo/) t Surfrider Europe has taken an official stance on wave pools. Photo: World Surf League (https://www.worldsurfleague,com c 572 1 of 5 3/27/21, 3:49 PM Surfrider Europe Takes a Stance on Wave Pools: It's Just Not That Into ... https://www.theinertia.com/surf/surfrider-europe-wave-pools-environmen... In the last few years, wave pools have exploded in popularity. The ball was a slow roll, but once a bunch of smart people figured how, exactly, one could recreate one of nature's most impressive features, that ball became a juggernaut. They're a divisive topic, though — turns out that making a perfect wave in a pool leaves a very large environmental footprint. Surfrider Europe has officially taken a side: It does not support artificial surfing wave pool projects. "Though many arguments exist for their recreational benefits, Surfrider Foundation Europe, a nonprofit created by surfers, takes the stance that the environmental concerns outweigh their value," Surfrider wrote in mid -June (https://surfrider.eu /en/learn/news/surfrider-europe-responds -to -entreaties -about-artificial-surfing-waves-121611202476. html). F It's a tough position for a lot of surfers. Most, of course, are at least slightly concerned about the myriad environmental issues F Y we're facing.But most of course love surfing a good wave. And while surfing a good wave is indeed very fun it ales in Y F g g g g �' p � t comparison when it comes to real -life importance. Surfing, aside from being fun, is useless. Utterly and completely useless. Its t t t sole purpose is fun. Which is a wonderful thing, isn't it? One could argue that the only really important thing in life is to have a kgood time, since none of us are making it out alive and only a select few will make any lasting difference. Face it: within a few generations, unless you do something huge, you will be dust in the wind and no one will remember you, so you might as well t have a really good time while you're here. But wave pools, while extraordinarily fun, will have lasting effects on the t environment, and those future generations that will have forgotten all about you are going to need the environment to survive. "Their construction implies land artificialization (pool, parking, roads) on natural or agricultural areas," Surfrider continued. l "This artificialization contributes to habitat destruction and adds to the decline of biodiversity... Operating them implies a P huge water consumption, with pools containing anywhere from 25 to 35.000m3 (equal to 10 to 14 Olympic pools), it is unnecessary and irresponsible to build these operations in the current context of climate change where water availability is on high alerts." ADVERTISEMENT r r Wave machines are indeed an enormous energy suck. According to Surfrider Europe, the Waco wave pool's wave generator, which uses American Wave Machine technology, uses 450 kW of electricity. That's the same average consumption as 800 French households. "In the framework of energetic transition and renewable energy development," Surfrider wrote, "consuming less energy is a priority for our society." It must be noted here that Surfrider's Los Angeles chapter was the recent recipient of $10,000 from the WSL's Khttps://www.worldsurfleague.com/) Rumble at the Ranch, which, of course, was held at a wave pool. The Surf Ranch in particular does a few things to offset the inherent environmental issues: back in 2016, it was announced that The Kelly Slater 573 2 of 5 3/27/21, 3:49 PM Surfrider Europe Takes a Stance on Wave Pools: It's Just Not That Into ... https://www.theinertia.com/surf/surfrider-europe-wave-pools-environmen... Wave Company partnered with PG&E's Solar Choice Program to go 100 percent solar. The wave is powered by renewable energy and reportedly emits zero carbon emissions (https://www.theinertia.com/surf/kelly-slaters-perfect-wave-is-now- powered-by-the-sun/)_, but it's still a complicated web. It would be better for the environment if wave pools didn't exist, but the 1 simple fact is that they do exist and will continue to exist. And since they're not going anywhere any time soon, it's better that 1 they at least try and do their part to have a lower footprint. Surfrider Europe addressed that in a roundabout way in its announcement. "Now is not a time for excess consumption, economic growth -seeking, or projects disconnected from the environmental issues we are facing today," it said. "The reality of F climate change should force us to rethink our growth models to reduce natural resource consumption and reconcile our F Y relationship with nature." F K k k t t f (HTTPS://WWW.FACEBOOK.COM/SHARER/SHARER.PHP?APP_ID-14 a�&YE RIB `ffiB{ 1 (�P�E TJ17� 81Af��}FYAaE6Al v � k k t t Popular in the Community r r r r This Wipeout From Surfing In Helmets: Skier Stan Rey Is as... Why Isn't It More... RedGrapes 1,Red Box f Yawwnnn, it's so Noticeably absent (to f sl0000wwwwww. me anyway) from the... r 6 Top Comment Top Comment o�) 3 k AdChoices Sponsored < c Conversation 4Comments r r Commenting as Guest Log In c c What do you think? GIF c c Sort by Best E f j Johnothan , \ 18 August, 2020 \ There could be a way to build wave park but not hurt the environment ( Reply f s ss E 18 August, 2020 "If you are willing to accept the assertion that surfing is a colossal waste of time, then I'll concede I've wasted my life. But in a better and more graceful manner than any of my two legged ` counterparts". ` t "Surfing, aside from being fun, is useless. Utterly and completely useless. " t someone's sounding quite a bit like el Gato.......... 574 3 of 5 3/27/21, 3:49 PM Surfrider Europe Takes a Stance on Wave Pools: It's Just Not That Into ... https://www.theinertia.com/surf/surfrider-europe-wave-pools-environmen... Reply f l R Rneycraft 19 August, 2020 450 KW a day? or what is that consumption rate per day? Respond if you know Reply 6 grapesofwrath > Rneycraft ? <, 19 August, 2020 <, Operating load, I'd imagine. A normal kettle has a load of 3kW so its like 150 kettles on the go... like a small village in Ireland at breakfast time... Reply F F Powered by 0 OpenWeb Terms Privacy Feedback k k t olorbox&utm_source=theinertia&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=alternating-thumbnails-c:Below Article Thumbnails:) t olorbox&utm_source=theinertia&utm_medium=referral&utm_content=alternating-thumbnails-c:Below Article Thumbnails:) k You May Like (https://n ewsharper.com/trending/celebrity-weight-loss-want-to-know-the ir-secrets-chrissy-metz?utm_source--ta boola&utm_m ed i u m--thei nertia&utm_cam pa ig n=9379493& utm_term=Chrissy+Metz+Is+So+Skinny+Now+And+Looks+Like+A+Model+%28Photos%29& utm_conte nt=http%3A%2 F%2 Fcd n.taboola.com%2Flibtrc%2Fstatic%2Fthumbnails%2Fa7905a 5d 53f54b32aOb3faf56ff17fab.j pg& t ts=2021-03-27+22%3A47%3A41&tb-0.1285&pcl=1) t Chrissy Metz Is So Skinny NowAnd Looks Like A Model (Photos) News Sharper (https://newsharper.com/trending/celebrity-weight-loss-want-to-know-their-secrets-chrissy-metz?utm_source=taboola&utm_med um--theinertia&utm_campaign=9379493& utm_term=Ch rissy+Metz+Is+So+Skinny+Now+And+Looks+Like+A+Mode I+%28Photos%29&utm_content-http%3A%2 F%2 Fcd n.taboola.com%2Flibtrc%2Fstatic%2Fthumbnails%2Fa7905a 5d53f54b32aOb3faf56ffl7fab.jpg& I ts=2021-03-27+22%3A47%3A41&tb-0.1285&pc1=1) I (https://www.thel nertia.com/surf/conne,coffin-party-wave-with-a-pod-of-dolphi ns-at-the-bom ( Watch Conner Coffin's Beautiful Party Wave With a Pod of Dolphins at The Box / (https://www.thelnertia.com/surf/conner-coffin-party-wave-with-a-pod-of-dolphins-at-the-box/) / (https://—.rocketgeeks.com/stories/tattoos-that-fal led -so -ha rd-they-almost-succeeded- nttbRutm_ca m pa ign=Tattoos%20Fails%2OCollageG%2O Ron i M_Reze,a%2OM a rll%2ONewTa bo%2Ov7%2OEn%20-%2ODesk-top%20 USA&utm_source--ta boola&utm_medium=thei nertia& f utm_term=33+Awful+Tattoo+Fails+%28Take+A+Deep+Breath+Before+No.+18%29&utm_content=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imguncom%2FSEdNZtd.jpg&psl=g_da56e8&c 0.1133) f 33 Awful Tattoo Fails (Take A Deep Breath Before No. 18) k RocketGeek k c c (https://—.rocketgeeks.com/stories/tattoos-that-fa i led -so -ha rd-they-almost-succeeded- [ nttbRutm_campaign=Tattoos%20Fails%2OCollageG%2ORoniM_Rezewa%2OMarll%2ONewTabo%2Ov7%2OEn%20-%2ODesktop%20USA&utm_sourcertaboola&utm_medium-theinertia& [ utm_term=33+Awful+Tattoo+Fails+%28Take+A+Deep+Breath+Before+No +18%29&utm_content=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imguncom%2FSEdNZtd.jpg&psl=g_da56e8&c-0.1133) (https://—.thei nertia.com/surf/debate-d id-maya-gabeira-or-ka i-len ny-score-the-biggest-wave-of-the-year-at-nazare/) Debate: Did Maya Gabeira or Kai Lenny Score the Biggest Wave of the Year at Nazare? r c c (https://—.thei nertia.com/surf/debate-d id-maya-gabeira-or-ka i-len ny-score-the-biggest-wave-of-the-year-at-nazare/) (https:H/ enherald.com/pop-culture/celebrities/jfks-grandson-is-now-all-grown-up-family-resemblance-just-uncanny/?I=a&utm_medium=CPC&utm_content--[Iad_title))&utm_source--taboola-adrizer& C utm_campaign=357136&utm_term=theinertia) C JFK's Grandson Is All Grown Up And The Resemblance Is Uncanny f unherald.com f (https:Hzen hera ld.com/pop-culture/celebrities/jfks-g ra ndson-is-now-all-grown-u p-family-resem bla nce-just-u ncan ny/?I=a&utm_med i u m=CPC&utm_content--[[ad_title))&utm_source--ta boola-adrizer& r utm_campaign=357136&utm_term-theinertia) 1' f (https://www.theinertia.com/environmenUocean-ramsey-wants-to-teach-you-everything-she-knows-about-sharks-and-safetyn r f Ocean Ramsey Wants to Teach You Everything She Knows About Sharks and Safety f c (https://www.theinertia.com/environmenUocean-mmsey-wants-to-teach-you-everything-she-knows-about-sharks-and-safetyn c (https://tracking lruthfi nder.comRa=102&oc=27&c=396&sl=CM-RON&s2=AG-Desktop&s3=CR E-AI I Liars+Ta ma ra U nsplah&s4=LP-396&s5=1036087&subtheme=people-search&tone=generic&utm_sou rce--taboola& utm_medium=referral&tblci=GiCw8rl9FCW5iukC33gRjSxtpDHmPkPGngBBn2VkETW1PCCOnj8o9pn3xdiU-Yor#tblciGiCw8rl9FCW5iukC33gRjSxtpDHmPkPGngBBn2VkETWiPCCOnj8o9pn3xdiU Yor) t One Thing All Liars Have In Common (Brace Yourself) t TruthFinder c c 575 4 of 5 3/27/21, 3:49 PM Surfrider Europe Takes a Stance on Wave Pools: It's Just Not That Into ... https://www.theinertia.com/surf/surfrider-europe-wave-pools-environmen... (https://tracking.truthfi ndencom/4a=102&oc=27&c=396&s1=CM-RON&s2=AG-Desktop&s3=CRE-AI I Liars+Ta ma ra U nsplah&s4=LP-396&s5=1036087&subtheme=people-search&tone=generic&utm_sou rce--taboola& utm_medium=referral&tblci=GiCW8rl9FCW 5iukC33gRjSxtpDHmPkPGngBBn2VkETW1PCCOnj8o9pn3xdiU Yor#tblciGiCw8rl9FCW 5iukC33gRjSxtpDHmPkPGngBBn2VkETW1PCCOnj8o9pn3xdiU Yor) (https://www.thei nertia.com/envi ron ment/i ncred i ble-video-of-shark-feed i ng-frenzy-on-250-pound-swordfish-i nterrupted-by-grouper-that-swa I lows-shark-whol en Incredible Video of Shark Feeding Frenzy on 250-Pound Swordfish Interrupted by Grouper That Swallows Shark Whole ` (https://www.thelnertia.com/environment/incred1ble-video-of-shark-feeding-frenzy-on-250-pound-swordfish-interrupted-by-grouper-that-swallows-shark-wholes ` CCPA Notice (https://ccparequest.Wboola.com/) NEWSLETTER Y Only the best. We promise. Y F K k k t Enter your email t V � t CONTRIBUTE t Join our community of contributors. APPLY (HTTPS://WWW.THEINERTIA.COM/CONTRIBUTE) E f The Inertia (https://www.theinertia.com� k Founded in 2010, The Inertia is the definitive voice of surf and outdoors. We approach the natural world and k its devoted culture with curiosity, optimism, and respect. We take pride in bringing our passion for the oceans ` and mountains to life through original films, reporting, and monumental gatherings. We aim to make a positive ` ( impact on our planet through partnerships with nonprofits working hard to preserve earth's sacred places. O � o o (htt (lY (� wIyoutube.com r h l a b" Ei Fffc 'PInertiaOFFICIAL1) r c c About (https://www.theinertia.com/aboutt) Advertise (https://www.theinertia.com/advertise/) Terms of Use (https://-.theinertia.com/terms-of-use/) t Contact (https://www.theinertia.com/contacts Get Involved (https://www.theinertia.com/contribute/) Privacy Policy (https://www.theinertia.com/privacy-policy/) r E E k k E E I I c c t t c c 576 5 of 5 3/27/21, 3:49 PM Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 10:06:25 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Opposition to Surf Park Resort Date: Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 9:58:27 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Peter Plaza To: Consulting Planner My name is Peter Plaza, and this is an amendment to my first list of comments on March 9th There has been a lot of comments opposing the construction and operation of the Surf Park, but there are no comments regarding the 190 acres of vacant land shown on the current Master Plan Design. Currently, "The Plan" shows approximately half of the parcel of land being developed, leaving approximately 190 acres of land as future residential development. The main roadway coming into the development goes through the undeveloped parcel of land, with apparent berms on both sides of the roadway with trees and landscaping. One would assume that the designers and developers want to create a vision -perception for the residents and guest that they are going through the Surf Park that is completed and fully developed. This certainly is not the case, and one would assume that it opens -up a host of questions and concerns by City Planners, Consultants and all of us that are members of the Opposition to the Surf Park Development, including me. I ask that the following talking -points be considered at the March 30th Meeting: 1. It is quite apparent that only half the parcel of property is planned for development now and the remaining 190 acres will be vacant and developed in "Phases" over -time. This opens up a lot of questions: a. Will the Master Plan remain for future residential homes, or, does the developer plan on amending the Master Plan in the future by adding more surf wave runs, once the first wave run proves to be successful? There is a potential, the developer is creating a "foot -in -the -door" scenario now with plans keep their options open for the future. This scenario can't play out, and must be stopped in it's tracks now by not allowing this development to be a Surf Park be built and only approved this parcel of land for what it is currently zoned for; residential homes and a golf course. b. How long will the 190 acres be left vacant? c. Will the City of La Quinta d. How is the 190 acres of vacant property be treated? Will the property be landscaped, or leave the existing vegetation intact, clear and grub the property and leave the surface dirt, or apply a surface treatment that will require maintenance over time? e. How do you prevent 190 acres from becoming a "dust -bowl" over the life of this condition? f. Future construction of the vacant parcel of property will now open -up the entire development, it's residents, guests, visitors and the community at large to repeated exposure to construction impacts again, again and again. g. The main roadway and entrance into the development will become the main thoroughfare for construction vehicles and equipment, resulting in disruption to the local residents and traffic patterns throughout the area. To prevent this from occurring, a new service entrance will be required on 58th Street to detour trades, construction vehicles, supply deliveries and heavy equipment from the main roadway. This will put pressure on the traffic pattern along this highly traveled roadway. h. Hauling, importing and exporting of dirt and gravel will be necessary during future development phases, as a result of limited lay -down areas and remote stockpile areas as the construction continues over a 10-year period. i. How will the developer control natural water run-off, erosion, drainage, ponding and flooding while the parcel of property remains dormant? j. Will there be standing water that will be a host for mosquito infestation, rodents, odors and other environmental impacts to the development and surrounding communities? 577Page 1 of 2 These are just some of the major concerns this development will create and represents the "tip -of -the - iceberg" scenario that will require all parties, consultants, etc., to consider these concerns and address them when developing, reviewing and approving the final Environmental Impact Report. CONCLUSION It is without any reservation by me and surely all those opposed to this Surf Park Development, that the City of La Quinta REJECT this proposed Master Plan, REJECT the re -zoning of this parcel of land and REJECT the multiple phases of construction over -time. This development should be reviewed for a residential development with a golf course. Nothing more -nothing less! Peter Plaza Trilogy at La Quinta Resident Sent from Mail for Windows 10 57EPage 2 of 2 Monday, March 8, 2021 at 14:23:00 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Development Date: Monday, March 8, 2021 at 2:20:06 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Grant Raeburn To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Please note we have been petitioned regarding the so-called 'disadvantages' of this planned development. Please note that we have lived in the area for the last 10 years, and have in that time seen next to no development almost anywhere in La Quinta except some housing being completed - a welcome addition. Right now the Coral Mountain area is just a wasteland, sometime shooting range for drunken denizens (shell cartridges and beer cans abound), and dumping ground for the odd mattress. ANY development there will improve the community.. You would have our wholehearted support for this to proceed in whatever category Council determines is best for the area. Bring it on! Jayne & Grant J. Raeburn E: grant.raeburn@gmail.com C: 1-604-230-7477 A: 80806 Via Puerta Azul, La Quinta, Ca 92253 579�age 1 of 1 Friday, March 12, 2021 at 11:32:00 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Fw: Coral Mountain Resort Date: Friday, March 12, 2021 at 10:52:27 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Dick Ramage To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Dick Ramage March 12,2021 To: Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner City of La Qu i nta, CA Re: Coral Mountain Resort Dear Ms. Criste My name is Richard Ramage and my wife Gail and I built our home and moved to Andalusia in April of 2016. We have been residents of California since 1975 and Andalusia is our permanent residence. Once we decided to relocate from the Pasadena area to the desert, we spent many days over a number of months looking at existing homes and areas where we could buy or build. We elected to build in Andalusia for a number of reasons but the main driver was the location which provided the beauty of the Coral & Santa Rosa Mountains and the solitude and quietness of desert living and not surrounded by commercial activities. 58(Page 1 of 2 am writing to inform you that I am very much opposed to this project and its request to rezone the proposed 386 acres from low density residential housing and golf course to commercial/ tourist, which will allow a four-story hotel, a 17-acre wave pool with 80-foot lights surrounding the wave pool, 7.7 acres devoted to commercial shops open to the public, and 496 homes, 104 rental homes with its own rental office. They have also requested 16 days for special events which is more than Coachella and Stagecoach combined. Everything surrounding the 386 acres is zoned only for residential housing and golf. This is like dropping Disneyland into a residential area, and will most definitely have an impact on home values. very much appreciate the fact that the City is requiring an environmental impact study in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. In reviewing what you plan to include in the Environmental report, I urge you to weigh heavily on the impact to surrounding residential communities. I also request sufficient notice be provided to the public before it is presented to the Planning Commission and the City Council and that these sessions be open to the public. Would you please update me on any changes that occur during this process. appreciate your assistance on this very important matter. Best regards, Richard & Gail Ramage 59095 Almeria La Quinta, CA 92253 58-Page 2 of 2 Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 16:08:53 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Proposed Coral Mountain Resort and Water/Wave Park, La Quinta, CA Date: Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 12:31:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Jeffrey Rasak To: Consulting Planner CC: Kim Rasak, Rob Michiels, Mike Charles Good morning Christe. On behalf of JCR Resources, LLC and its Members, thank you for confirming receipt of our correspondence dated March 24, 2021 and for sending the Notice of Scoping Meeting. I will do my best to attend the March 30 meeting, however, in the event I am unable to do so, nevertheless wanted to provide you, City Staff and Council Members with additional comments and concerns JCR would like to see addressed. As supplement to its March 24 letter, please allow this correspondence to become a part of the record in these land use proceedings. If it was not clear from my earlier correspondence, I would like to make clear that JCR is opposed to the construction, development and operation of a hotel or hospitality component on the 386 acre Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan property proposed for development as the Coral Mountain Resort Project (including Water Park). We are also strongly opposed to construction, development and operation of a wave basin/water park on the property. Were this 386 acre Specific Planned property to be developed, we believe and maintain the highest and best use and well as the most consistent and compatible use for the property would be a high end single family residential development, including golf course, with open space, bike and walking trails and other public/community amenities. Andalusia and Madison Club two cases in point. All things considered, it is hard to imagine how City Planners and Council Members would even consider development and operation of a hotel and water park on the property. That is especially true given the changes and revisions that would be needed in the existing land use designations and zoning code. Quite frankly, hotel and recreational uses, including water park are more suited for development along I-10 near Fantasy Springs (not in the middle of prime residential/golf communities in La Quinta up against beautiful and scenic Coral Mountain. Here in San Diego Nicole, JMI and Hyatt have been working for 20 years to secure entitlement and project approvals to construct and develop a small 130 room hotel near the beach in Encinitas. Yes, it has taken 20 years for those entitlements and approvals to be granted. The result is a well planned, high end boutique hotel (not exceeding two stories or 24 feet in height). For your information, I have attached a recent article and photo from Coast News describing the Alila Marea Beach Resort. Should the City capitulate and decide to entitle and approve development and operation of a hotel or hospitality component on the 386 acre property, JCR would like to correct its March 24 letter and make clear that any such hotel should be limited in size/keys and not exceed 24 feet in height. Further, any such hotel should truly be first class (five star) with renowned and stunning architecture and design. The community should have input in those designs and architecture. 58Tage 1 of 4 Concerning lighting and to the extent the City were to entitle and approve construction and operation of a wave basin/water park, no lighting should be allowed or permitted. Given the existing character and uses in the community/neighborhood, there simply is no reason why any wave basin or water park should be allowed to operate past dusk/dark. I live in San Diego and have surfed my whole life. I don't surf at night and can tell you that night time surfing is simply a stretch and bridge too far. It should never be allow in La Quinta and expressly prohibited either by deed restriction or in any conditions of approval for the Project. Further and concerning the environmental effects of the proposed wave basin/water park in La Quinta, the developer incorrectly points to Kelly Slater's Wave Ranch in Lemoore, CA as some reliable indicator. It is not. Using the Wave Ranch in Lemoore, CA as some yardstick or weathervane for a wave basin/water park in La Quinta is simply wrong and nothing more than mixing apples and oranges. In these regards, I urge the City not to take the developer's bait and accept such self-serving non -sense as fact or as any reliable indicator of the adverse and detrimental environmental effects on such a project in La Quinta. With all due respect, using and comparing Lemoore, CA to La Quinta, CA is not only out of place, but wholly inappropriate in so many respects. Insofar as scoping for the EIR, please note JCR's concerns above, below and in its March 24 letter, all of which we believe and request be thoroughly investigated and properly addressed: 1. aesthetics; 2. preservation of desert and mountain views as well as open space; 3. preservation of desert habitat as well as native and indigenous plant material and trees; 4. noise and sound; 5. traffic (both during construction and post construction, including each phase of develop.; 6. protection and/or degradation of existing streets/roads and off -site improvements; 7. light and dark skies; 8. storm water treatment, discharge, run-off; 9. pollution (air quality, water quality and trash; 10. crime/security (increased and armed 24 hour security guards needed at Andalusia); 11. means and methods to be employed by contractors/subcontractors for dust control; 12. effect on property values at Andalusia and Club Membership (based on actual design, size, quantity, quality, phasing, and uses developed within of the Project; 13. quality of life (for those outside of the proposed Project and at Andalusia); 14. deliveries and storage of all goods, supplies and materials, including gravel, base, asphalt, concrete, lumber and other construction materials (during each phase of construction, including for the neighborhood commerical component, both during 58yage 2 of 4 and after construction); 15. fate of and/or loss of the proposed Coral Mountain Regional Park; 16. loss of the existing open space, walking and mountain biking trails; 17. loss of direct access to Coral Mountain from Andalusia and other surrounding communities; 18. potential alcohol and drug use at the wave basin/water park; 19. effect of the Project (by phase) on all public services, including fire, water, police, utilities, trash/refuse pick up, etc. 20. comparative benefit/burden to the existing homeowners of having a residential golf community developed on the subject property (like Madison Club) versus a hotel/wave park; Nicole, I want to reiterate JCR's strong concern and objection to the developer's misdirection concerning phasing of the Project. More specifically and not surprisingly, the developer proposes to first secure entitlement for construction of the wave basin/wave park, before delivering on the other promises/components, including development of a high end first class neighborhood Shopping Center on the hard corner of Madison and 58th. Is this just a typical developer "bait and switch? If this developer is unable or unwilling to first or simultaneously design and develop a much needed first class neighborhood Center as proposed on the 7.7 acres, including a quality anchor tenant like Whole Foods, Trader Joe's or Sprouts and some great restaurants, indeed I'd be very skeptical (and so too should the City). Lastly Nicole, I have not received any information whatsoever about the hotel or commercial retail component? Who will operate the hotel? How many hotels has this developer successfully completed and operated and where are those hotels? Other than conceptual eye candy, has the developer prepared preliminary colored exterior building design elevations? Does this developer have all of the funding necessary to complete the entire Project (both debt and equity)? Has the City been provided with copies of the developer's Operating and Development Proformas? Other than Project entitlements, is the developer proposing or seeking any form of public assistance? Thank you Nicole. Kindly share a copy of the letter with the appropriate City Staff and with each Council Member. Jeffrey C. Rasak President and Chief Executive Officer Sterling Development Corporation Rancho Santa Fe Plaza 162 S. Rancho Santa Fe Rd., Suite B-85 Encinitas, CA 92024 ph: (760) 633-0006 fax: (760) 633-0072 e-mail: sterlingdevelopment _yahoo.com 584Page 3 of 4 58,Tage 4 of 4 Al2 THE COAST NEWS MARCH 26, 2121 Luxury beach resort in Encinitas celebrates grand opening ap Dustin Jones ENCINITAS — The Alila Marea Beach Resort finally opened its doors March 17 and welcomed members of the public to tour the hotel grounds. The 130-room hotel sits between South Ponto and Grandview beaches, com- plete with a pool deck over- looking the ocean, a bar and restaurant, ballrooms, meeting areas and more. The resort will utilize local businesses for many of its guest services, including Elektra Bikes, Lofty Coffee and Vuori. The Alila Marea also worked with the Rob Mach- ado Foundation to promote sustainability practices. No single -use plastics can he found anywhere on the property, General Man- ager Benjamin Thiele said. The resort hopes to embody what the city of Encinitas stands for, work- ing with residents and lo- cal businesses to better the community. "Our team is honored to open our doors to the local community and travelers to experience our new luxury resort in this breathtaking AN AERIAL view of the new Alila Marea Beach Resort in Encinitas. The luxury beachfront resort has worked with several local businesses and organizations, including the Rob Machado Foundation, to promote sustainability. Courtesypnoro location," Thiele said. ning Commission attended spear participated in the a hotel or resort of this ca- Members of the Encin- the grand opening, and ribbon -cutting ceremony. pacity, she explained. itas City Council and Plan- Mayor Catherine Blake- The city has never had The resort brought over 100 jobs to Encinitas and the transient occupancy tax expects to bring in $2 mil- lion a year to the city. "It's exciting for us to be able to elevate the level of accommodations that we can offer," Blakespear said. "I appreciate the integra- tion into the seaside bluffs, the earth tone colors, and the integration with the lo- cal businesses to provide services on site." Hotel developers have been working to develop the seaside bluff for over 20 years. Time and time again, projects were considered and then fell through for one reason or another. The Alila Marea dream became a reality through collaborative work from JMI Realty, Fenway Capital Advisors, Suffolk Construc- tion and Hyatt. "It is incredible to see Alila Marea Beach Resort Encinitas, a project over two decades in the mak- ing, come to fruition," said John Kratzer, CEO of JMI Realty. "We look forward to sharing this special place with our guests and neigh- bors in the San Diego com- munity." 586 JCR Resources, LLC March 24, 2021 Via email: consultingplanner@laquintaca.pov and US Mail CITY OF LA QUINTA c/o Nicole Sauviat Christe Consulting Planner 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Coral Mountain Resort; General Plan Amendment (GPA 2019-0002), Zone Change (ZC2019-0004), Specific Plan Amendment to SP 03-067, Specific Plan (SP 2019-0003), Tentative Tract Map (TTM 2019-0005) and Site Development Permit (SDP) Dear Ms. Christe: With reference the above captioned project ("the Project") and the proposed entitlements and changes to the City's General Plan, current Zoning Code, Specific Plan 03-067 as well as the proposed Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Permit, and on behalf of JCR Resources, LLC ("JCR"), a property owner within Andalusia and the area covered under the Andalusia Specific Plan, please be advised that JCR is vigorously opposed to the Project as planned and the City's consideration of the entitlements that would be needed and required to develop and construct the Project. With respect to notice and an opportunity to be heard in these land use/entitlement proceedings and for development of the Project (including but not limited to the City's Notice of Preparation for the required environmental document under CEQA), which would result in removal of 386 acres from and within the existing 929 acre Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan, we have heretofore received no notice, no communication and/or no correspondence from the City, Andalusia (Sunrise LQ, LLC) or from the developer. In fact, when we purchased our home at Andalusia in October, 2020, we have no recollection or documentation evidencing disclosure having been made concerning these proposed, non- conforming and inconsistent uses. In fact, the disclosures set forth in our purchase and sale documents with Sunrise LQ, LLC reference development of a proposed Park (Coral Mountain Regional Park) by the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District adjacent to the northwest boundary of the "Master Community." Instead of getting the public Park which was referenced and disclosed, we now understand that public/community Park may be jettisoned in lieu of a private development generally inaccessible to the public and community members. The first JCR learned of the proposed Project and changes needed to the City's General Plan, Zoning Code and Specific Plan was an email we received last Saturday, March 20th from another Rancho Santa Fe Plaza 162 South Rancho Santa Fe Road, Suite B-85, Encinitas, CA 92024 Phone: (760) 633-0006 Fax: (760) 633-0072 Email: sterlingdevelopment@yahoo.com 587 homeowner in Andalusia (who, as you might imagine, is also strongly opposed to the Project as planned and City's grant of the required Project entitlements). Notwithstanding the foregoing and the apparent effort to fly this project under the radar and deny affected property owners/stakeholders the right to be heard and participate in the process, we request that moving forward, JCR be provided with or have access to any and all information, documentation, reports, studies, site plans, engineering, design elevations, environmental reports/studies, geotechnical reports and all other information concerning the Project. We are particularly interested in receiving a complete copy of the EIR to insure it has been prepared by a qualified firm, without bias and in strict accordance with applicable law (CEQA) and that it properly, thoroughly and accurately addresses all of the environmental impacts and concerns resulting from the proposed Project. JCR's contact information is as follows: JCR Resources, LLC Attention: Jeffrey C. Rasak, Manager 162 Rancho Santa Fe Road, Suite B85 Rancho Santa Fe Plaza Encinitas, CA 92024 (t) 760.633.0006 (f) 760.633.0072 Email: sterlingdevelopment@vahoo.com JCR's property in La Quinta is located at 81-762 Andalusia. Needless to say, JCR takes exception and vigorously objects to the City's consideration and/or grant of entitlements for development and construction of the Project as currently envisioned, not only due to its non -conforming and wholly inconsistent uses, but also due to the as yet undetermined effects on; aesthetics and preservation of views, open space and dark skies noise/sound light traffic environmental impacts/pollution crime/security construction traffic and degradation of roads air quality property values quality of life deliveries and truck traffic alcohol and drug use 588 In addition to the above, JCR has great concern about the height of the proposed hospitality or hotel component as well as the proposed development of a 7.7 acre 60,000 square foot neighborhood commercial retail Shopping Center on the southwest corner of Madison Street and Avenue 58. Any hotel or other commercial buildings developed within the Project must be limited to two -stories in height or 28 feet (excluding cupolas and other design features). We also strongly object to any light towers or other site improvements which exceed 20 feet in height. Based on the proposed phasing for the Project, it appears the developer is seeking entitlement to first develop and construct its all important Wave Basin without any formal and definitive plans or anchor tenant commitment for the commercial retail component of the Project. Any commercial retail center at the southwest corner of Madison and Ave 58 should include a high quality national credit tenant to anchor the Project, such as Whole Foods, Sprouts, Trader Joe's or Gelsons. We certainly do not want to see a 7-Eleven or C-Store in our neighborhood and there should be very tight restrictions and strict guidelines imposed by the City as to the quality, type and mix of tenant uses as well as the design criteria and site planning for any commercial retail component of the Project. Any neighborhood commercial component must be a high end, first class retail Center with stunning design elevations and plenty of amenities for the surrounding communities. Finally, and on behalf of JCR, we expressly reserve all of our rights and remedies concerning the proposed Project and any actions taken by the City of La Quinta or other agencies having jurisdiction. Thank you. Sincerely, i� Jeffrey C. Rasak Manager 589 Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 10:24:05 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Re: Proposed Coral Mountain Resort and Water/Wave Park, La Quinta, CA Date: Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 6:07:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Jeffrey Rasak To: Consulting Planner CC: Kim Rasak, Rob Michiels, Mike Charles Attachments: Coral Mountain Resort Scoping Meeting Ad 3.17.21.pdf Thank you Nicole. Hopefully, Sunday is a day of rest for you. Concerning the scope of work for the EIR, I will make every effort to attend the the Zoom Meeting on March 30. Nevertheless, JCR intends that its previous communications and correspondence as well as this correspondence be duly noted and taken into consideration by the City and its Consulting Engineers in determining scope. In order to ensure the integrated use of natural and social sciences in the EIR and give due consideration to all of the qualitative as well as the quantitative factors involved, I assume the Report will be prepared using an interdisciplinary approach? This is critically important to properly establish and support the various disciplines involved as well as the interrelationships among and between those disciplines in order to ultimately determine the true and real environmental effects of this ill- conceived Project. As you know, the National Environmental Policy Act requires that the subject EIR consider qualitative factors as well as quantitative, economic and technical factors. In keeping with and in furtherance of the aforementioned objectives, would you please provide JCR with the name of the firm(s) or individual(s) that will be providing professional/consulting engineering services to the City for this public disclosure document. While I can probably find their respective CV or company biograph on- line, to the extent you have that information, it would certainly be helpful and instructive. Finally Nicole, since I have been kept in the dark about this Project until very recently, I am trying to get up to speed as quickly as possible. Toward that goal, I have posed numerous questions concerning the proposed Coral Mountain Resort and Water Park which remain unanswered. Will you or someone from the City be providing JCR with a reply or response to those questions? Thanks again Nicole. We appreciate your cooperation and assistance thus far. Jeffrey C. Rasak President and Chief Executive Officer Sterling Development Corporation Rancho Santa Fe Plaza 59(Page 1 of 6 162 S. Rancho Santa Fe Rd., Suite B-85 Encinitas, CA 92024 ph: (760) 633-0006 fax: (760) 633-0072 e-mail: sterlingdevelopment _yahoo.com On Saturday, March 27, 2021, 04:08:38 PM PDT, Consulting Planner <consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Mr. Rasak, Thank you for your comments. I received both your email, and will append the attachment to your first email. They will be included in the EIR Notice of Preparation comments for the project. We have added a Scoping Meeting on March 30 at 4 PM. I have attached the Notice, which includes instructions on receiving the Zoom link if you would like to participate. If you would like to watch the meeting but not speak, it will also be livestreamed on the City's website. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Jeffrey Rasak <sterlingdevelopment@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 12:36 PM To: Consulting Planner<ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Kim Rasak <kimmrasa k@yahoo.com>; Rob Michiels<rmichiels@consiIiumassociates.net>; Mike Charles <mgacharles@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Proposed Coral Mountain Resort and Water/Wave Park, La Quinta, CA EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. My apologies Nicole, I forgot to attach the article and photo concerning the Alila Marea Beach Hotel in Encinitas that was referenced in my letter. I have attached a copy for your information and review. Thanks. 59-Page 2 of 6 Jeffrey C. Rasak President and Chief Executive Officer Sterling Development Corporation Rancho Santa Fe Plaza 162 S. Rancho Santa Fe Rd., Suite B-85 Encinitas, CA 92024 ph: (760) 633-0006 fax: (760) 633-0072 e-mail: sterlingdevelopment _yahoo.com On Saturday, March 27, 2021, 12:31:27 PM PDT, Jeffrey Rasak <sterlingdevelopment@yahoo.com> wrote: Good morning Christe. On behalf of JCR Resources, LLC and its Members, thank you for confirming receipt of our correspondence dated March 24, 2021 and for sending the Notice of Scoping Meeting. I will do my best to attend the March 30 meeting, however, in the event I am unable to do so, nevertheless wanted to provide you, City Staff and Council Members with additional comments and concerns JCR would like to see addressed. As supplement to its March 24 letter, please allow this correspondence to become a part of the record in these land use proceedings. If it was not clear from my earlier correspondence, I would like to make clear that JCR is opposed to the construction, development and operation of a hotel or hospitality component on the 386 acre Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan property proposed for development as the Coral Mountain Resort Project (including Water Park). We are also strongly opposed to construction, development and operation of a wave basin/water park on the property. Were this 386 acre Specific Planned property to be developed, we believe and maintain the highest and best use and well as the most consistent and compatible use for the property would be a high end single family residential development, including golf course, with open space, bike and walking trails and other public/community amenities. Andalusia and Madison Club two cases in point. All things considered, it is hard to imagine how City Planners and Council Members would even consider development and operation of a hotel and water park on the property. That is especially true given the changes and revisions that would be needed in the existing land use designations and zoning code. Quite frankly, hotel and recreational uses, including water park are more 59Tage 3 of 6 suited for development along I-10 near Fantasy Springs (not in the middle of prime residential/golf communities in La Quinta up against beautiful and scenic Coral Mountain. Here in San Diego Nicole, JMI and Hyatt have been working for 20 years to secure entitlement and project approvals to construct and develop a small 130 room hotel near the beach in Encinitas. Yes, it has taken 20 years for those entitlements and approvals to be granted. The result is a well planned, high end boutique hotel (not exceeding two stories or 24 feet in height). For your information, I have attached a recent article and photo from Coast News describing the Alila Marea Beach Resort. Should the City capitulate and decide to entitle and approve development and operation of a hotel or hospitality component on the 386 acre property, JCR would like to correct its March 24 letter and make clear that any such hotel should be limited in size/keys and not exceed 24 feet in height. Further, any such hotel should truly be first class (five star) with renowned and stunning architecture and design. The community should have input in those designs and architecture. Concerning lighting and to the extent the City were to entitle and approve construction and operation of a wave basin/water park, no lighting should be allowed or permitted. Given the existing character and uses in the community/ neighborhood, there simply is no reason why any wave basin or water park should be allowed to operate past dusk/dark. I live in San Diego and have surfed my whole life. I don't surf at night and can tell you that night time surfing is simply a stretch and bridge too far. It should never be allow in La Quinta and expressly prohibited either by deed restriction or in any conditions of approval for the Project. Further and concerning the environmental effects of the proposed wave basin/water park in La Quinta, the developer incorrectly points to Kelly Slater's Wave Ranch in Lemoore, CA as some reliable indicator. It is not. Using the Wave Ranch in Lemoore, CA as some yardstick or weathervane for a wave basin/water park in La Quinta is simply wrong and nothing more than mixing apples and oranges. In these regards, I urge the City not to take the developer's bait and accept such self-serving non -sense as fact or as any reliable indicator of the adverse and detrimental environmental effects on such a project in La Quinta. With all due respect, using and comparing Lemoore, CA to La Quinta, CA is not only out of place, but wholly inappropriate in so many respects. 59Yage 4 of 6 Insofar as scoping for the EIR, please note JCR's concerns above, below and in its March 24 letter, all of which we believe and request be thoroughly investigated and properly addressed: 1. aesthetics; 2. preservation of desert and mountain views as well as open space; 3. preservation of desert habitat as well as native and indigenous plant material and trees; 4. noise and sound; 5. traffic (both during construction and post construction, including each phase of develop.; 6. protection and/or degradation of existing streets/roads and off -site improvements; 7. light and dark skies; 8. storm water treatment, discharge, run-off; 9. pollution (air quality, water quality and trash; 10. crime/security (increased and armed 24 hour security guards needed at Andalusia); 11. means and methods to be employed by contractors/subcontractors for dust control; 12. effect on property values at Andalusia and Club Membership (based on actual design, size, quantity, quality, phasing, and uses developed within of the Project; 13. quality of life (for those outside of the proposed Project and at Andalusia); 14. deliveries and storage of all goods, supplies and materials, including gravel, base, asphalt, concrete, lumber and other construction materials (during each phase of construction, including for the neighborhood commerical component, both during and after construction); 15. fate of and/or loss of the proposed Coral Mountain Regional Park; 16. loss of the existing open space, walking and mountain biking trails; 17. loss of direct access to Coral Mountain from Andalusia and other surrounding communities; 18. potential alcohol and drug use at the wave basin/water park; 19. effect of the Project (by phase) on all public services, including fire, water, police, utilities, trash/refuse pick up, etc. 20. comparative benefit/burden to the existing homeowners of having a residential golf community developed on the subject property (like Madison Club) versus a hotel/wave park; Nicole, I want to reiterate JCR's strong concern and objection to the developer's 594Page 5 of 6 misdirection concerning phasing of the Project. More specifically and not surprisingly, the developer proposes to first secure entitlement for construction of the wave basin/wave park, before delivering on the other promises/components, including development of a high end first class neighborhood Shopping Center on the hard corner of Madison and 58th. Is this just a typical developer "bait and switch? If this developer is unable or unwilling to first or simultaneously design and develop a much needed first class neighborhood Center as proposed on the 7.7 acres, including a quality anchor tenant like Whole Foods, Trader Joe's or Sprouts and some great restaurants, indeed I'd be very skeptical (and so too should the City). Lastly Nicole, I have not received any information whatsoever about the hotel or commercial retail component? Who will operate the hotel? How many hotels has this developer successfully completed and operated and where are those hotels? Other than conceptual eye candy, has the developer prepared preliminary colored exterior building design elevations? Does this developer have all of the funding necessary to complete the entire Project (both debt and equity)? Has the City been provided with copies of the developer's Operating and Development Proformas? Other than Project entitlements, is the developer proposing or seeking any form of public assistance? Thank you Nicole. Kindly share a copy of the letter with the appropriate City Staff and with each Council Member. Jeffrey C. Rasak President and Chief Executive Officer Sterling Development Corporation Rancho Santa Fe Plaza 162 S. Rancho Santa Fe Rd., Suite B-85 Encinitas, CA 92024 ph: (760) 633-0006 fax: (760) 633-0072 e-mail: sterlingdevelopment _yahoo.com 5950age 6 of 6 Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 12:24:03 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Re: Proposed Coral Mountain Resort and Water/Wave Park, La Quinta, CA Date: Sunday, March 28, 2021 at 12:19:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Jeffrey Rasak To: Consulting Planner CC: Kim Rasak, Rob Michiels, Mike Charles Thanks Nicole. I appreciate you providing the names of those tasked with preparing the EIR. While you dodged my question about qualitative and quantitative factors, I'm sure we will have other opportunities to review, comment and, if need be, challenge the sufficiency and findings set in the EIR. Would you please add to my list of JCR's concerns/issues to be included in the Report: Biology, Geology, Hazards, Hydrology and Minerals. Thanks again Nicole and have a great Palm Sunday. Jeffrey C. Rasak President and Chief Executive Officer Sterling Development Corporation Rancho Santa Fe Plaza 162 S. Rancho Santa Fe Rd., Suite B-85 Encinitas, CA 92024 ph: (760) 633-0006 fax: (760) 633-0072 e-mail: sterlingdevelopment _yahoo.com On Sunday, March 28, 2021, 10:23:25 AM PDT, Consulting Planner<consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Mr. Rasak, The meeting will be recorded, so if you cannot attend you should be able to watch it through the City's website. Please request a Zoom link by return email if you think that you may attend. Your letter has been made part of the record for the Notice of Preparation, will be included in the EIR, and as you requested will be distributed to City Council members. Responses to your questions will be incorporated into the EIR. We do not plan to respond individually to commenters. Please note that the EIR is being prepared under the authority of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), not NEPA. There are no federal permits involved in this application, and NEPA does not apply. The EIR is being prepared by the following: MSA Consultants: applicant's planners, engineers and environmental consultants responsible for drafting the EIR itself Urban Crossroads: Air quality, GHG, Noise and Traffic impact analyses CRM Tech: Cultural and paleontological resources analyses 59EPage 1 of 7 Sladden Engineering: Soils and geology LSA Associated: Biological resource analysis If you are able to attend or listen to the meeting, a presentation of the project will be made, which should answer many of your questions. If any remain, please feel free to contact me or to file a Public Records request for any additional information you may need. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Jeffrey Rasak <sterlingdevelopment@yahoo.com> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 6:07 PM To: Consulting Planner<ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Cc: Kim Rasak <kimmrasa k@yahoo.com>; Rob Michiels <rmichiels@consiIiumassociates.net>; Mike Charles <mgacharles@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Proposed Coral Mountain Resort and Water/Wave Park, La Quinta, CA EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. Thank you Nicole. Hopefully, Sunday is a day of rest for you. Concerning the scope of work for the EIR, I will make every effort to attend the the Zoom Meeting on March 30. Nevertheless, JCR intends that its previous communications and correspondence as well as this correspondence be duly noted and taken into consideration by the City and its Consulting Engineers in determining scope. In order to ensure the integrated use of natural and social sciences in the EIR and give due consideration to all of the qualitative as well as the quantitative factors involved, I assume the Report will be prepared using an interdisciplinary approach? This is critically important to properly establish and support the various disciplines involved as well as the interrelationships among and between those disciplines in order to ultimately determine the true and real environmental effects of this ill- conceived Project. As you know, the National Environmental Policy Act requires that the subject EIR consider qualitative factors as well as quantitative, economic and 59 r-Page 2 of 7 technical factors. In keeping with and in furtherance of the aforementioned objectives, would you please provide JCR with the name of the firm(s) or individual(s) that will be providing professional/consulting engineering services to the City for this public disclosure document. While I can probably find their respective CV or company biograph on- line, to the extent you have that information, it would certainly be helpful and instructive. Finally Nicole, since I have been kept in the dark about this Project until very recently, I am trying to get up to speed as quickly as possible. Toward that goal, I have posed numerous questions concerning the proposed Coral Mountain Resort and Water Park which remain unanswered. Will you or someone from the City be providing JCR with a reply or response to those questions? Thanks again Nicole. We appreciate your cooperation and assistance thus far. Jeffrey C. Rasak President and Chief Executive Officer Sterling Development Corporation Rancho Santa Fe Plaza 162 S. Rancho Santa Fe Rd., Suite B-85 Encinitas, CA 92024 ph: (760) 633-0006 fax: (760) 633-0072 e-mail: sterlingdevelopment _yahoo.com On Saturday, March 27, 2021, 04:08:38 PM PDT, Consulting Planner <consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Mr. Rasak, Thank you for your comments. I received both your email, and will append the attachment to your first email. They will be included in the EIR Notice of Preparation comments for the project. We have added a Scoping Meeting on March 30 at 4 PM. I have attached the Notice, which includes instructions on receiving the Zoom link if you would like to participate. If you would like to watch the meeting but not speak, it will also be livestreamed on the City's website. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 59EPage 3 of 7 Monday, March 15, 2021 at 07:46:50 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: ATTN: Ms. Sauviat Criste RE: OBJECTION to requested Zoning Designation Change in South La Quinta / Meriwether COMMERCIAL proposal Date: Monday, March 15, 2021 at 7:17:20 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Diane Rebryna To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Attachments: PDF REBRYNA EMAIL MAR 15, 2021 .pdf March 15, 2021 Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 BY EMAIL: consultingpjanner@laquintaca.gov RE: Applicant Meriweather Developments request for a zoning change in South La Quinta from "Low Density Residential w/golf course" to" Tourist Commercial". MY OPPOSITION, as a South La Quinta resident - for the following reasons: Ms. Sauviat Criste, I am writing today as a concerned South La Quinta (Trilogy) resident to voice my opposition to the application for a rezoning designation which would allow for the the Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort ( "CMWP" ) development in La Quinta. I have also attached a PDF of the exact content of this email for your easy reference and reading. I will not repeat in great detail the many developments as presented by Meriwether Development, published press releases, and local newspaper articles. It is likely however that you and other planning and Council members seen and heard most, if not all, of the following concerns, as summarized below. 1. Concerns for the Coral Mountain Area : is there potential for destruction and/or desecration of this area during construction and ongoing usage - with adverse effects on that natural historical components (including the artefacts), wildlife, topography, etc. on an existing recreational area that is currently accessible to ALL La Quinta residents, not just an elite few can afford this type of "adventure sport resort"? 2. Water concerns - there will be a continuous sourcing of the water required for this project ( including the accounting for evaporation in the heat and hygiene requirements for a human use recreational area ); especially when residents of the desert are asked to be "water conscious". 3. Traffic concerns: basically the "5 W's and a How" - who, what, where, when and why and how ... who will handle the requirement for upgrades and maintenance to existing roadways/ who will pay for these, how will safety for persons be accounted for with the increased traffic, who will monitor the speed zones that must be in place, how will emergency vehicles fire, ambulance) still provide the excellent service that they are known to provide without obstruction. 4. "Sewer" services and "wastewater" management? An area like this could have in the range of 5000 plus people in it at any given time - many more than an originally proposed residential community would hold. Notwithstanding that there must be waste water considerations for the wave pool itself. 5. Noise Pollution: Construction noise for "10 - 20 years"(!), noise of the Wave Pool itself including the 30 second "announcements" and "wave breaking crashing" sounds at 75 decibels. In addition, there will be permanent ongoing noise from wave generators, guests, loudspeakers and entertainment venues on site. NOTE. 365 days per year- 7AM -10 PM... in and amongst quiet residential communities! The noise from similar parks has been measured at 85d8. This level of noise 365 days per year is unacceptable in a residential area 6. Elevated Structures: 80 foot tall stadium style light towers and others illuminating the wave pool, swimming pools, skateboard park, BMX track, parking lots, etc. - imagine "multiple 8 story-ish towers" in other parts of the Coachella valley, notwithstanding situated among quiet residential communities. This is not in keeping with our beautiful desert valley. 7. Light Pollution: Most of La Quinta has dark beautiful desert skies at night. 80 foot illuminated towers are an inconceivable consideration, especially combined with the noise. 8. Special Events: On top of the 365 days - "all day every day" - of all of the above, the Developer speaks of an additional 16 days and nights for special events - likely over 4 days of long weekends. This begs some additional discussion: As La Quinta residents, we are well aware of the additional demands placed on our community infrastructure by events like Coachella, Stagecoach and even the Triathlon. Having said that, these events are only a few weeks a year and these events BENEFIT THE ENTIRE 599�age 1 of 3 COACHELLA VALLEY. "Special events" at the CMWP will likely be limited only to its residents or guests who book and travel there. These will not benefit La Quinta residents as a whole. Public transportation will be limited to allow for off site enjoyment of other La Quinta attractions by the guests - so cars will be necessary - there come the parking, bottleneck traffic concerns and the ripple effect described as per 3) above. The residential areas however around this development would be severely impacted - not only during the "special events" but in prep time leading up to and take down time following. 9. IN ADDITION, I have an additional concern which has not been mentioned in detail: This will be a private facility apparently not open to anyone other than hotel guests. What benefit is there for the "residents" neighbouring communities. Our kids and grandkids who come to stay with us cannot even access or utilize the facility on a daily basis. We would have all of the headaches as surrounding communities with none of the benefits, such as "proximity"... At least if you live close to Disneyland, you can go there with your kids and grandkids I Executive Summary of Reasons for my Opposition: I strongly request of and urge the City of La Quinta to PLEASE NOT change the zoning from the current designation Low -Density Residential w/ 18-hole golf course to TOURIST/COMMERCIAL to allow for this CMWP or any other commercial venture / development to go forward for the following reasons: When we and our neighbours bought in South La Quinta ( Trilogy ), we sought out the peace and quiet and the "almost reverence" for nature that this area allows for. We (thought we) bought with confidence knowing that the zoning of the surrounding areas zoning would be in keeping with this. We can speak with certainty that the residents of our other neighborhood communities share this same sentiment. A recent publication stated 'According to the city, the land in question is currently zoned for Low Density Residential and Golf Course. The existing 2003 plan for the site allows for residential development and a golf course. Hotels and wave parks are not allowed. That means the city would need to amend the existing plan. The city's General Plan and zoning designations would also need to be changed- The CMWP is a COMMERCIAL VENTURE - A MEGA RESORT. It would directly benefit the Developer however in turn, it will absolutely devastate the residential communities around it. We as homeowners will suffer financially and in terms of enjoyment of the serene and quality life style / recreational opportunities that South La Quinta is noted for. 2. This proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort is exactly the WRONG type of development for this location. This would be a literal "drop" of a COMMERCIAL tourist amusement park venue resort amongst the several quiet and ESTABLISHED residential communities of South La Quinta. 3. With respect to other La Quinta residents / citizens: This type of Commercial development that will have a "pricey" admission ticket will not benefit the average La Quinta resident, only those who will basically travel in to La Quinta to a "theme park" type of destination as a guest / resident. As City Planners and City Council Members, I ask that you please consider how you might feel if a city should allow for a change in zoning to permit a commercial "Guests Only Wave Theme /Amusement Park" as your immediate "neighbor", and again please, 1 ask that do not allow this project to move forward by allowing for the zoning change application. Thank you for your consideration Sincerely, Diane Rebryna Trilogy La Quinta Resident 60149 Honeysuckle Street La Quinta, CA 92253 PS - as per https://www.meriwetherco.com/ventures/coral-mountain/ - while I understand and am respectful of those persons who "eschew a gated country club in favour of a next generation offering of community, wellness and sports anchored by a wave basin from the Kelly Slater Wave Company" - If I could respectfully suggest an option - a development of this kind might be better suited somewhere along the 110 corridor to the East of La Quinta in a commercial zone with high visibility and draw potential , recognizing it for what it is - a commercial venture that appeals to those who would like a different way to "live and travel" as stated by Meriwether et al. 60(Page 2 of 3 Friday, April 2, 2021 at 11:03:13 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: DIANE REBRYNA SUBMISSION APRIL 2, 2021 Project: Coral Mountain Resort Date: Friday, April 2, 2021 at 9:50:35 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Diane Rebryna To: Consulting Planner Attachments: REBRYNA SUBMISSION .pdf April 2, 2021 / 10:51 AM MST Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 BY EMAIL: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov RE: Applicant Meriweather Developments request for a zoning change in South La Quinta from "Low Density Residential w/golf course" to" Tourist Commercial'. MY OPPOSITION, as a South La Quinta resident. Ms. Sauviat Criste, Please accept the following PDF document attached which includes comments and questions to be considered for the preparation of the DRAFT EIR. I realize that this is a long and comprehensive document, therefore I have tried to categorize my comments in keeping with those in the Notice of Preparation. I hope that this will be helpful to you. I would appreciate acknowledgment of receipt. Thank you for your consideration. Kind regards, Diane Rebryna 60149 Honeysuckle Street La Quinta, CA 92253 1 403 287 8417 60,Page 1 of 1 RE: 3.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION, listed in the ORIGINAL N of P, on page 10. The N of P document states the following, on Page 10 "Low Density Residential Land" uses will occupy approximately 232 acres - a maximum of 496 dwelling units.... Tourist Commercial Land ... @ 120.8 acres and, "General Commercial land uses will occupy approximately 7.7 acres out of 386) with up to 60,000 square feet of retail commercial uses available to the general public" (This data is also referred to in 3.3 Planning Areas chart of the N of P page 16) Question : What exactly will be available to the general public in terms of "commercial space". There is mention of restaurants. What other commercial ventures are being considered? Are firm arrangements with the Developer in place at this time ? (there are concerns about " pot shops, liquor stores, or the like" - although legal, these could potentially contribute to a"rowdiness" factor by virtue of easy access by consumers during day to day operations as well as during Special Events ) The N of P document states the following, on Page 10 ... that Open Space Recreation land uses will occur on 23.6 acres in the SW portion of the site Questions are: Will this "recreational space" be open to the public ? - or only to guests and residents of the Project. It is likely that the public is currently using this space now for recreation, so in other words, is it possible that the recreational space that has been available up to now to the residents of La Quinta will be "usurped" for exclusive use by the guests and residents of this PRIVATE resort ... Comments are made in the N of P there will be hiking, biking and ropes courses - again ONLY for residents and guests ? Will there be rock climbing on Coral Mountain ? The N of P document speaks to Construction and Vacant Land, on Page 11 re: SUB -PHASES ACCORDING TO MARKET CONDITIONS ... According to the Coral Mountain Specific Plan, project construction will occur in eight (8) primary development areas with buildout anticipated to occur in three primary phases over approximately 4 to 6 years. Each primary development area may be broken into sub -phases in response to market conditions and consumer demand. For example, the hotel of up to 150 keys may be constructed in multiple sub -phases. The Conceptual Development Plan ... reflects the anticipated construction sequence and may be non -sequential and adjusted subject to market conditions. •1% Phasing is conceptual and subject to refinement with final engineering design and changes in sequence in response to market conditions. Comments and Questions are: My interpretation of this is that - "market conditions and consumer demand" are essentially what drives this entire Project. There could be a possibility that land could remain vacant for years and years to come - "all depends", It appears that the Developer receives all of the "benefits and breaks" to make "any and all encompassing decisions" without any firm time commitment, and the residents of South La Quinta are provided no assurance as to when and how this Project will be developed out. Where is the accountability here and commitment in keeping with the Project Objectives that were outlined in the N of P? Especially the "motherhood and apple pie" statement that a Project Objective is to "implement a plan that recognizes and responds to the natural and aesthetic character of the property". It won't be aesthetic if parts of the Development sit vacant/undeveloped for years and years. N of P says... "project construction will occur in eight (8) primary development areas with buildout anticipated to occur in three primary phases over approximately 4- to 6-years. Each primary development area MAY be broken into sub -phases ... ( again) IN RESPONSE to MARKET CONDITIONS and CONSUMER DEMAND." The residents in surrounding communities will be at the mercy of the Developer with no end in sight to the construction. Additionally the Developer apparently will have the right to keep asking and asking for changes to the original plan. I take no comfort with the word "MAY". In the same vein, as a result of the Developer's proposal to finish the Project in phases, there will likely be ... ONGOING "UNFINISHED CONSTRUCTION RELATED ISSUES" FOR YEARS TO COME. For your ease of reference to this particular topic, I am addressing these here rather than in EIR Category: Transportation. Comments and Questions are: 1. The construction of a 380-acre major development is no easy task, nor does is it come without impacts to the surrounding community - especially when there is no commitment to finish it by a certain time. 2. There will be likely be constant and increased flow of vehicle traffic on our roadways for several years which will cause noise, diesel fumes, disruption to local traffic, increase in potential accidents/injuries, airborne dust, pollution, smog, loud -speaker noise from construction activities and overall general construction noise. 3. There are longterm effects of construction to consider -especially in an "open ended" project that is proposed to be developed over a long period of time, perhaps with several stops and starts ( depending on "market conditions and consumer demand ':..). These include dust, soil transport and storage issues, including its transport by tandem trucks which can cause significant road damage, and also potential damage by road sweepers that will be necessary. 603 4. Construction traffic potentially for several years is also a concern. What is the planned truck route(s) for construction ? Where is the dumpsite going to be situated ? Where will construction vehicles be parked ? Will the City require all parking for all construction vehicles must be maintained on the development site and not outside the construction fence line? 5. It is a given that road damage will occur. In all cases when major developments damage roadways, Cities have a typical solution by requiring the developer to put a Roadway Bond in place. Is this what the City plans to do with this Developer? 6. Where will the construction entrance be ? Does the developer intend to use the main roadway and entrance into the development as the main thoroughfare for construction vehicles and equipment, resulting in disruption to the local residents and traffic patterns throughout the area? 7. How will the main roadway areas coming into the undeveloped vacant land be designed for ingress and egress from the developed portion of the property? To mitigate the traffic quagmire within the development, will a new service entrance be required on 58th Avenue to detour trades, construction vehicles, supply deliveries and heavy equipment in and out of the development? Could this put pressure on the traffic pattern along this highly traveled roadway? 8. Increased construction traffic and resultant road damage will occur at Ave 58, Madison and Ave 60. In summary, the above 1- 8 are questions please about how will this "open ended construction project" and how increased construction will impact the residential communities around it. ONGOING UNFINISHED "VACANT LAND ISSUES" FOR YEARS TO COME The "Plan" shows approximately half of the parcel of land being developed, leaving approximately 190 acres of land as future residential development, again vacant and developed over time. There will be vacant land issues ongoing for years, as a result of the Developer's proposal to finish the Project in phases that are "open ended". Comments and Questions are: 1. How will the proposed VACANT land be handled by the Developer? How long will the land be left vacant by the Developer? 2. Vacant land( proximal to construction) is subject to becoming a dust bowl. How will the Developer mitigate this ? 3. How will the Developer handle future construction of the vacant parcel of property, should this development be approved. What will the impact of ongoing construction on the vacant land be to the success of the development ? How will it impact residents, guests, visitors and the community at large, all who will be subjected to repeated construction impacts again and again ? 4. Will the vacant land become a "staging area" for ongoing construction for years and years -in other words an eyesore ? 5. How will the developer control natural water run-off, erosion, drainage, ponding and flooding and construction waste while the parcel of property remains dormant? Will there be standing water that will be 604 a host for mosquito infestation, rodents, odours, etc and therefore negatively impact the surrounding communities ? 6. Will the Developer be required to install a finished wall and landscape the entire perimeter prior to construction on the Project ? The N of P document states the following, on Page 12 re: SPECIAL EVENTS ... The project applicant anticipates the potential occurrence of special events involving attendance of up to Z500 guests per day for up to 4 days (up to 4 events per year), and AND on Page 28 re: (Temporary Use Permits) TUPs for Special Events ... are required by the City to accommodate special, unique, or limited duration activities that might otherwise be outside the provisions of normal zoning. Temporary uses are anticipated and allowed by the Specific Plan.TUPs are reviewed administratively by the Design and Development Director and do not require a public hearing. Comments and Questions are: Special Events will impact the surrounding residential communities mostly with respect to the NOISE and TRAFFIC / TRANSPORTATION categories as per the EIR. The holding of "Special Event"s means more people - up to 2500 - in a given location at given times. It is a given that there will be NOISE ISSUES that will affect the proximal residential communities . I will address some of the NOISE concerns and questions regarding Special Events later in the EIR component of this document, however I will provide some other comments and questions here: 1. How do we know that there will not bean application by the Developer to hold events more than 4 days per year ? Would the entitlement that is being considered permit an uncontrolled number of special events, without any public consultation ? ... because they are anticipated and allowed by the Specific Plan ? 2. Immediate concerns raised are increased traffic, parking issues and the anticipated resultant congestion not only for the Special Events themselves but for "set up and take down time" - a few days before and a few days after . 3. With Special Events, increased Traffic will occur and there will be resulting congestion issues: During Surfing and/or Special Events, all the roadways converging to this parcel of land, surrounded by beautiful, serene residential communities and golf courses will be backed -up with cars coming from Interstate 10, Highway 111, Jefferson Street, Madison Street, Monroe Street, 58th Street, 60th Street and alternate roads snaking through and avoiding the traffic jam. There will police vehicles and flashing light everywhere, attempting to control traffic with barricades and traffic police. Who is going to pay for all these services? Does the City of La Quinta realize that this could be "real" problem and have a plan on how this will be handled ? 605 Our neighborhoods already experience challenges with Ironman, numerous running and cycling events, Coachella / Stagecoach Festivals etc. and the coming of SilverRock and Pendry hotels along with their intended events. Has the number of events already in play for this area taken into account the stressors on the environment ? There will likely be parking jams with bottlenecks and effects of congestion in the area. We often see this with PGA Special events - typically held only once a year - what about 4 or more additional Special Events added to this mix ? 6. With Special events, there will be Parking / Pedestrian safety concerns There have been references made to off -site parking and a shuttle service that will be transporting spectators to and from the parking lot to the event. What is the Developer's plan to provide all the necessary parking stalls for the permanent residents, temporary residents, hotel guests, hotel and event staff, surfing professionals/ participants, security personnel, media personnel, etc. required for Special Events ? If off -site parking is approved by the City, where will this parking lot be located? If it is off site, there will also be safety concerns for the pedestrian attendees - as they try to exit the area and walk down the existing roadways. Mayhem could result with emergency police and EMT vehicles attempting to deal with the impacts of congestion with people and vehicles. This will significantly impact our community and will require additional safety security and police resources. Has the impact of these demands been considered ? 7. Will all of these Special events be open to the Public ? If not, what is the benefit of PRIVATE Special Events to the residents of the City of La Quinta ? I am concerned because there appears to be no straight answer as to who can attend these proposed Special Events. So, I pose the question, will these Special Events be closed or open to the Public ? We've heard the argument that as La Quinta residents, we are well aware of the additional demands placed on our community infrastructure by events like Coachella, Stagecoach and even the Triathlon, and these Special Events will be no different. However, and I feel this is the big difference, these events above are only a few weeks a year and these events benefit commerce in all of La Quinta enormously. Special Events at this Surf Park, if Private, will ONLY benefit its residents and guests. I wonder if it is highly likely that the target market for these Special Events will be tourists so that they can come and stay and partake in the activities in the Private Resort and of course increase the Developer's revenue, and not benefit the entire City of La Quinta's residents and merchants. .1, RE: 3.7 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION, listed in the ORIGINAL N of P, on page 28 RE: a General Plan Amendment & 2. RE: the Zone Change: ... both for which approval is sought by the Applicant ...and both require hearings before the Commission and Council ... requesting approval of a General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use Map for the project area to General Commercial, Low Density Residential, Tourist Commercial, and Open Space Recreation; ... a Zone Change to revise the City's Zoning Map to Neighborhood Commercial, Low Density Residential, Parks and Recreation, and Tourist Commercial,• Comments and Questions are: The Project simply does not fit with the character of the "neighbourhood". It would be a "theme park like" environment essentially "inserted" right into the middle of multiple quiet residential communities. Rezoning will create a "slippery -slope" with no end in sight. Once this parcel of property is rezoned to T/C, the surrounding vacant parcels of land would likely be vulnerable to other commercial developments that will either support the Surf Park or attempt to compliment it with other developments that will adversely affect the entire character of this region. Re -zoning is the crux of the issues that are concerning. Rezoning will allow for the Developer's "foot in the door " and then possibly for changes to the original plan. At one point, the management of this proposed project represented that they planned this to be a high end residential community compatible with surrounding residential areas, but with more information, it now appears to be morphing into a short term vacation rental property with a strong commercial "theme park" character. "Sub phases" have been referred to previously as the build out starts only on part of the parcel. This allows the Developer the latitude discussed earlier. There are concerns that the Developer will ask the City of La Quinta for variances to add additional Wave Pools, more commercial structures, stadiums for music concerts and another hotel to the remaining vacant 200 acres. It is understood that this is being done at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch, Lemoore, Calif. I am concerned that this will be easy for the Developer, should they get the requested zoning change to Tourist / Commercial. On the issue of the proposed Tourist Commercial Zone Change and STVRs : In La Quinta, in the case of Tourist Commercial zoning, there are 345 acres currently zoned T/C of which 138 acres are not developed (40% not developed). It has been argued that we need more T/C zoning to support tourism and help deal with the short term rental problem. It has been proposed that, from an environmental perspective, rather than expanding the acreage under T/C, there should be a drive to get the current acreage developed. There is no need for additional TC zones if what we have is not being used. In our particular area of South La Quinta, there are three T/C zoning areas relatively near to us already. Another interesting fact to note is that the highest vacancy rate in La Quinta is office space - 26%. It is given that the City is concerned about STVR and assuring enough supply as the City curtails STVR permits. Developers and the City are looking at ways to convert unused office space for rentals. For example some of the offices above Old Town could be rental units. All without major new zoning. 607 The City does not need to rezone the Meriwether property to T/C to add to supply of short term rental, it can work with developers to convert some of the vacant commercial properties to rental. They are located in the right place, like Old Town, not in amongst quiet communities. Again this resort will be PRIVATE, so it will offer no benefit to offset the shortage of STVR issues that the City faces. In summary, we do not need additional T/C zones in our residential neighbourhood. There are other solutions that that the City should consider. RE: a TENTATIVE TRACT MAP, which approval is asked for by the Applicant - The N of P document states the following, on Page 28 ... future TTMs MAY* be filed with each phase of development as necessary to implement the balance of the project" ( *my underline and embolden) Question: What exactly does the word "MAY " imply - "change after change after change" with delays interjected ? Again, how can our residential communities have a comfort level with the word "MAY" ? RE: 4.0 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) listed in the ORIGINAL N of P, on page 301t is acknowledged that .. The EIR will • evaluate the environmental effects of the project in accordance with the latest regulatory requirements, determine whether significant impacts will occur, • identify feasible mitigation measures to minimize or avoid any potentially significant environmental effects of the proposed project, and • evaluate a reasonable range of alternatives to the proposed project. A. EIR - Aesthetics, on page 31 The following is stated in the N of P .. The proposed uses and structures would have a potential effect on aesthetic resources. ... The proposed project's impact on existing scenic vistas as well as the scenic quality in the area will be evaluated in the EIR. This evaluation will analyze the proposed features, such as the Wave basin, associated structure heights, building character, mass and heights, and project landscaping. 9TIR ... Historic structures occur on the project site, as does the significant rock outcropping that is Coral Mountain. Therefore, the project's impact to scenic resources, including but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway will also be analyzed in the EIR. ...The project will introduce light and glare associated with commercial, residential and resort development to a site that is currently vacant and does not emit any light or glare. The project proposes a recreational Wave basin, including 80 foot light poles, to illuminate the Wave basin in the evenings. Therefore, potential light and glare impacts to daytime and nighttime views in the area as a result of project development will be analyzed in the EIR. Comments and Questions are: This Project proposes a PRIVATE mixed use community that essentially centres around a Surf Resort that, in essence, is equivalent to a theme park environment. This Project does not "fit" here - it will challenge, obliterate and take away from how the scenic vistas of this area will appear in the future. It is incompatible with the surrounding environment and will forever challenge the peaceful ambience in an area that is revered for both recreational opportunities and its serenity for both La Quinta residents and visitors alike. People are in awe when they come to visit this area, as the Coral Mountain area with its access to Lake Cahuilla and the Coral Mountain Park has been described as some of the best scenery in the world. This is the "quintessential rocky desert" - with the added benefit of containing and being surrounded by incredible features of historical, paleontological and archeological significance. Why is it even being considered that a "a fossilized reef from an ancient coastline" form a backdrop to a surf resort ? The Developer makes reference to this in one of its many promotional "youtube videos" - there is one is entitled "Coral Mountain on Location"...(/ would encourage a look at this -sorry, link will not copy and paste ! ) From this promotional video ... "The Coral Mountains will soon become the backdrop to the world's most consistent and perfectly designed Surfing Wave ". As of this time, the Developer has already placed signage indicating this is private property - particularly ominous in light of what is being proposed. Regarding the N of P acknowledged "light and potential glare" concerns - 80 foot (essentially 8 stories !) illuminated towers will "pepper" the day skies because of their visibility over the 6 foot fence ( imagine cell towers like this everywhere ... ) and forever challenge La Quinta's beautiful desert night skies. B. EIR - Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions, on page 32 The following is stated in the N of P... ... The project has the potential to generate criteria emissions and greenhouse gas emissions in excess of SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District) standards. •1! Comments and Questions are: It is assumed that, because of proprietary concerns, that Kelly Slater et al is reluctant to make public any information regarding general and required chemical maintenance of the wave basin and its water contained therein. Therefore the impacts are not known at this time with respect to the applicable air quality plan. It is not known whether sensitive receptors will be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations. It is not known if there will be any associated lingering pollutants or odors that will impact the environment or impact the people or the biology of the area, and what could be an issue with dispersion as a result of the prevailing winds that this area is known for. I look forward to the results of the EIR analyses including a "stand alone air quality study " and a "green gas house study" . It is concerning, however, that there are no other wave pool parks situated in a comparable desert environment that allow for comparison regarding ambient air conditions and wind conditions - so how will these studies will be conducted. Will there be a comparison of "apples" to "apples"? C. EIR - Biological Resources, on page 33 The following is stated in the N of P... ... The project is NOT anticipated to have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities, since there are no jurisdictional waters and no lakes, rivers, or stream beds onsite. Comments and Questions are: I am looking forward to the results of the "biological survey and records search" regarding sensitive or special status animal species located within the boundaries of the Project and hope that this category will be addressed in the EIR in a fulsome manner. There are species that could be significantly adversely effected by this Project. Big Horn Sheep are known to frequent this area. What will the effects of the Wave Park be on their population? Desert mountain sheep are on the endangered list. Coral Mountain (and its surrounding areas) is their habitat. It is known that human activity is not good for them. The following comments are of note from 2.24 CVCC LaQ Barrier FEIR Final 4.10.19: "Bighorn sheep populations fluctuate over time, and although the local bighorn sheep population may increase over short periods, it is clear that bighorn sheep do not benefit in the long -run from access to urbanized areas... The hills and mountains of the La Quinta region provide suitable habitat for PBS, with numerous natural water sources and a variety of forage occurring at different times and at different locations. PBS have occupied the region continuously for thousands of years. The attraction of PBS to urban lands ... for forage and water has made them vulnerable to hazards including ... oleander poisoning, vehicles, and the spread of disease. While bighorn sheep populations will fluctuate, conditions that are found in urban areas are detrimental to the long-term health of the local herd and the species". This Project as proposed will be built out as the "ultimate" urban area - which is obviously of concern. 610 Additionally, a local tour guide advised me that the biological effects to flora and fauna of this Project on this area will be "horrible". Reference was also made to a desert thrush /warbler bird that lives here and is protected. Although this person may not be viewed as an expert, nor someone who can speak with authority, this comment is very concerning to me. D. EIR - Cultural and Tribal Cultural Resources ... In addition to the project -specific Geotechnical Investigation, a project specific Paleontological Resources Assessment will be included in the EIR to identify any significant, non-renewable paleontological resources that may exist within or adjacent to the project site ( see also F below under Geology and Soils ) Comments and Questions are: I am looking forward to information in the EIR that will address whether the Project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource, cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource or disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries. Additionally, there is substantial interest in whether the the Project, DURING CONSTRUCTION and OPERATIONALLY, will cause an adverse change in the significance of a tribal cultural resource ... in that it would affect a site, feature, place, or cultural landscape, sacred place, or object with cultural value... How will the archeological, tribal and paleontological artefacts located in the area of the Project be protected? What will the impact of the Project's proposed adjunctive private recreational activities (beyond the surfing experience) be on the historical artefacts, features and landmarks of Coral Mountain and surrounding areas ? How will residents and visitors who currently enjoy access to these cultural and historical amenities be restricted from continuing to access and enjoy these artefacts, features and landmarks, once this Project is built out? There are discussions that these areas will be closed and private, accessible only to the private residents and guests of the Project. Again. the Developer has already posted signage that indicates that this is Private Property. E. EIR Category - Energy Resources Comments and Questions are: It is hoped that there will be a fulsome EIR report with respect to this Category including the analysis of Project related impacts to the energy resources during both construction activities AND operation. What about the impacts of off -sight improvements that will be necessary ? It is also hoped that there will be details provided as to where the energy for this project will come from - noting that the N of P states the following: "The project site, located at the southwest corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street, lies within the service area boundaries of Imperial Irrigation District (IID) for electricity and Southern California Gas Company for natural gas". Will the Wave Pool require natural gas to heat it in the winter ? 611 On the matter of energy, desert residents are routinely asked to conserve energy. There have been rolling blackouts periodically in So Cal to accommodate extreme energy requirements. What kind of energy load will this Project - both during construction and operationally - put on So. La Quinta residents ? It is extremely difficult to find this information out due likely to proprietary constraints. In other words, it is known that the existing infrastructure is capable of supporting the additional loads? Who will pay for the upgrades identified in the N of P stated here: "... the project will be required to install an off -site transformer bank at an existing IID substation located at 81600 Avenue 58 as part of proposed upgrades. Construction for the conduits and line extension would occur in the existing right-of-way." . F. EIR Category - Geology and Soils The following is stated in the N of P... ... A site -specific Geotechnical Investigation is required for the project property, to investigate the geotechnical and soil conditions at the site. ... The project site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo fault zone. However, seismic activity that may occur on either the San Andreas fault zone (approximately 7.75 miles northeast of the project site), or San Jacinto fault zone (approximately 14 miles southwest of the project site) could result in severe ground shaking as PER: Excerpts From the Zoom Scovina Meeting of March 30. 2021 ... It is common practice that a geotechnical investigation is performed by a Professional Engineer prior to development plans proceeding for a project. The purpose of the geotechnical investigation is to determine the nature and condition of the existing subsoils and to determine if they are suitable for the proposed development. It is surprising that we are speaking of a project significantly progressed in its planning stage without having a geotechnical investigation performed to determine if the site is even suitable from a soils perspective for the proposed use. The city's own La Quinta 35 Document provides information that indicates that the proposed development will be situated on comparatively young Alluvial soils that have a moderate to high liquefaction potential. The document also states that liquefaction can occur during seismic events or from ground vibrations of relatively long duration with an intensity over 0.2g." https://www.loquintaco.govlhome/showpublisheddocument?id=33565 This document also states that this site will be adversely affected by liquefaction by a seismic event on the San Andreas or San Jacinto fault line. Additionally, there are two currently inactive rock faults adjacent to the proposed wave park's location which may also come into play. Has there been any consideration given to the energy induced in the ground by repetitive wave action and vibration from the wave generation equipment ? The alluvial soils in the Coachella Valley have a long history of subsidence as they are a relatively young deposits, particularly near the base of mountains where fluvial deposits may also exist. The wave park may trigger localized subsidence of these weak deposits by the constant energy release from the waves. What steps will be taken to ensure that the wave park does not permit seepage of water into the ground? Any loss of water into the ground will create a perched groundwater conditions which will only exacerbate the liquefaction potential of the soil and may induce localized settlements or subsidence. 612 If there is water seepage into the ground, an assessment of the impact the seepage may have on the subsidence of adjacent structures and communities is necessary. The US Forest Service has published a document entitled "Don't bust the biological soil crust: Preserving and restoring an important desert resource" This document describes the vital importance of the biological soil crust in and areas in preventing soil erosion and creating an ecosystem for the desert flora and fauna to establish. What impact will the development have on the soil crust and was steps will the Developer take to prevent irreversible damage to this vital ecosystem? What is most concerning to me is the phrase from the above - "It is surprising that we are speaking of a project significantly progressed in its planning stage without having a geotechnical investigation performed to determine if the site is even suitable from a soils perspective for the proposed use" The Developer purchased this property - was this an afterthought that a Surf Resort with a Wave Pool be placed here ? Perhaps like what happened in Florida ? https://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/local/2019/05/31/plans-sink-wsls-keIly-slater-designed- wave-pool-florida-su rfers/1298225001/ I look forward to the results of the site -specific Geotechnical Investigation. G. EIR Category - Hazards and Hazardous Materials The following is stated in the N of P... ... "Implementation of the project would facilitate new growth and development throughout the project area. Resort, commercial, residential, and recreational developments would result in an increased population of residents and non-residents that would have both the potential to be susceptible to hazards, and to utilize hazardous materials" Comments and Questions are: It is expected that a fulsome EIR analysis will be performed regarding the Project -related impacts to the transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials, and the release of hazardous materials into the environment that can impact the environment, people and wildlife, both during construction and operation. It has not been made public what hazardous materials WILL be used in the operational aspect of the Project. For example, what chemicals will be used to keep the water clean in the wave pool ? Will a workplace Hazard Assessment(s) as per OSHA be performed and the results made public ? ... The gentleman who spoke at the Scoping meeting indicated that there will be a review of potential safety concerns for construction workers with respect to hazardous materials, amongst other concerns, at the Project workplace. Additionally, will potential biological hazards to the public be addressed and assessed for ? https://people.com/ health/man-dies-brain-eating-parasite-swimming-wave-pool/ Will there be information in the EIR regarding the implementation of an emergency response or evacuation plan due to inadvertent hazardous material release.? 613 H. EIR Category - Hydrology and Water Quality The following is stated in the N of P... ... The EIR analysis will consider how the flood protection solutions will be incorporated into the site design, storm drain infrastructure, and water quality management practices in relation to the applicable regulatory standards that apply during construction and operation of the proposed development. ... The EIR will analyze the project's site design measures to prevent interference with existing groundwater recharge facilities located south of the project. Comments and Questions are To make sure that my comments were reasonable in the context of an EIR, I am using this definition of "Hydrology" from Wikipedia.... is the scientific study of the movement distribution, and management of water on Earth... and other planets, including the water cycle, water resources, and environmental watershed sustainability" While I will not attempt to address all details that relate to Hydrology (which 1 understand could include Water Conservation Measures, you will remember that I made a presentation at the Scoping Meeting on this topic), would like to ask this question please... Since the Developer continually asserts that the "Project will use less water than a golf course".... Can the EIR please address this statement and its ramifications please ? Based on information received regarding water evaporation at the Kelly Slater Surf Park in LeMoore California, I and other residents are concerned that the water consumption for this new Wave pool has been significantly underestimated by the Coachella Valley Water District. This is of great concern during a California Drought, considering the Coachella Valley is in the process of approving four Surf Parks and has relied on the same information. AS PER: Excerpts From the Zoom Scoping Meeting of March 30, 2021 ...The majority of the drinking water consumed by the residents of the Coachella Valley is from the underground aquifer. Water for irrigation primarily comes from the Colorado River. The aquifer is recharged by a canal bringing water from the north and then introducing it into the aquifer just to the south of the site's proposed location... How will the aquifer be impacted considering as well that the N of P states that" the source of the water for the project is from two wells proposed for the site". Can the EIR please address the impact of TWO wells. Can the EIR please comment on the environmental effects on the residential communities surrounding it, in the event of a flooding of the contents of the Wave Basin due to seismic activity ?... considering the following information below in small font : With respect to a potential flooding event from the Wave Pool in the event of seismic activity, there are possible insurance issues to all residential communities' residents... If there was an earthquake and a flood resulted from this Project, 1 have been provided the following information... "Earthquake policy would cover only earthquake damage. In the scenario where there is an earthquake followed by a flood you would need flood coverage as well. The standard NFIP flood policy provides 250k for the dwelling and 100k for contents.. the cost around $500 annually. There could be liability on the water park and City of La Q if water escaped from there and damaged neighbouring homes... ". 614 Where would the discarded water from the water basin go ? - is it of a quality that it could be "recycled" for use elsewhere ? 1. EIR Category - Land Use Planning The following is stated in the N of P... ... the N of P states The surrounding developments are gated and operate separately from each other. The proposed project occurs on vacant land, and will not impact operation of surrounding residential projects, currently or in the future, and development of the proposed project will not divide an established community. Questions and Comments are as follow: While an EIR assessment of this particular category "Land Use Planning" may not be planned for, I wish to be on record that I strongly object to this broad statement above in the N of P which is highlighted in yellow. There are indeed many environmental impacts as a result of this Project - related to both construction and the operation - on the surrounding residential communities asa result of zoning changes that are ALL outlined with in this document including aesthetics, noise, circulation / traffic, drain emergency services and public utilities etc. Also, just because an established community is "not divided", does not meant that there is no impact to the surrounding residential projects - now or in the future. J. EIR Category -Noise The following is stated in the N of P... "The proposed project is consistent with the City's residential and residential and resort character.", and that .. A project -specific noise impact analysis will be prepared. ... Potential impacts of noise associated with project construction and operation will be analyzed and addressed in the EIR ... Additionally, project -generated groundborne vibration and groundborne noise levels will also be analyzed in the EIR Comments and Questions are: NOISE is one of my and my fellow residents' greatest concerns and its impact on the residential neighbourhoods that surround the proposed Project MUST please be considered in a fulsome manner in the EIR. With respect, I fail to understand the comment highlighted above from the N of P as to how this Project is "consistent with the City's residential and resort character" ... How has that determination been made ? There are no other operational surf/wave parks to compare it to and I seriously doubt that this can be compared to say, for instance, the "La Quinta Resort "both in terms of the ambient air noise and noise that is generated by the people and the activities that take place there. https:// www.laquintaresort.com 615 Interestingly, and perhaps as an aside, when one goes online to view wave pool videos, there is never any operational sound, only visuals. That seems consistent with a lot of noise being generated by the waves and possible vibration - so that the speakers are essentially drowned out. I am very concerned about how a noise analysis will accurately capture the sound of the actual wave basin itself. Even if one was to visit another surf/wave complex, this Project purports to be different - "bigger and better". The noise generated could be unique to this location in that many experts feel that Coral Mountain acts to amplify noise. For example, local residents who are not even that close by, report hearing hikers speaking. What impact will the mountains have on directing the operational noise back towards the existing communities ? Will the mountains act like a "bandshell" and exacerbate this ? Compound this with all of the additional noise that will come from a theme -park setting like this; noise will be generated by the guests and those who partake in the other activities being offered up. The "noise categories" as per the analysis for the EIR and their impact on the surrounding residential communities must please include reference to the following: 1. The construction noise associated with the actual construction of the wave basin itself. This will not be your average residential development - where houses and a golf club will be built. This is a massive construction project. 2. The noise from "Special Events": As addressed prior, at least 4 are proposed -perhaps there maybe more? These Special Events will include portions that will likely be broadcast on major networks or filmed. What will be required for filming or broadcasting; for example, will there be helicopters circling the area with negative impacts on the residential communities that surround the Project ? 3. The day to day operational noise: In addition to the waves "crashing(?) " at the Project, there will /could be: Surface water craft used in the day to day operation of the wave pool - jet skis constantly in use. Loudspeaker systems used to announce the waves - "EVERY THREE MINUTES - ALL DAY EVERY DAY" ... when the wave pool is active - which will be be from 7 AM - 10 PM. Music playing continuously ? Noise from a Jumbotron? It's been said that that a Jumbotron will be installed. If so, will its picture be accompanied by commentary? How loud with this commentary be? During what hours ? Various numbers and types of sound generating equipment will be used to generate the waves i.e. noise from the Hydrofoils as per the following which copied off the Lemoore Wave Park website: "The 100 ton hydrofoils run down a track with the help of more than 150 truck tires at around 18 miles per hour" . This wave pool is BIGGER than that at Lemoore. What will the impact of this be? Noise from other recreational activities ? - what would this be ? 616 To summarize ... Will there be a CUMULATIVE noise analysis performed that will look at all of the above, particularly the impact of those point in (3. above, and 2. and 3 above) , that is, When Operational (3.), and When both Operational AND when Special Events (2.and 3.) are taking place. In other words, how will all of the noise together in the worst case scenarios impact the surrounding residential areas? - particularly when there is the potential to echo off of Coral Mountain. It is also hoped that operational aspects during both day and evening hours will be considered as part of a comprehensive noise study. In addition to the noise that will be generated when Operational, the proposed Project sub phase development is another important consideration. Residents of surrounding communities could be subject to construction noise over the course of many years, should this Project be approved as proposed. If sub phase development is approved, there will be times that we will be required to endure BOTH construction and operational noise. We wish to state emphatically in conclusion that the NOISE impacts will be considerable and negative in terms of impact to the residential communities that surround it. FYI, The City of La Quinta has published a document entitled "La Quinta 2035 General Plan Environmental Hazards" and includes NOISE in that category. This document states the following:... "Careful consideration of each future project will be required to assure that compatibility is maintained. The City's ongoing efforts to preserve the quality of life for all its residents, present and future, must include the protection of a quiet noise environment" K. EIR Category - Population and Housing For the record, and acknowledging that Population and Housing will not be considered in the EIR... The following two statements are made in the N of P ... and 1 believe that they contradict each other: Under PUBLIC SERVICES (CATEGORY FOLLOWS NEXT) it says the following "Implementation of the proposed project WILL increase the permanent population which could have an impact on the City's public services"; YET IN THIS POPULATION AND HOUSING SECTION, it says: "The project is not anticipated to result in an indirect growth inducing impact because the existing infrastructure has been sized to accommodate long term growth" I believe that there is some merit to addressing this inconsistency for the purpose of ongoing accurate communications. L. EIR Cateaory - Public Services Comments and Questions are: Will this Category in the EIR address required burdens due to the following which are necessary: 617 Law enforcement and emergency response personnel Vehicles and supplies Infrastructure, including buildings Will the budget be studied - now or later? Are the local medical emergency facilities prepared to potential increased usage and associated types of common injuries M. EIR Category - Recreation For the record, and acknowledging that Recreation will not be considered in the EIR ... Comments and Questions are: There is a concern here that I wish to register for the record ... as per CEQA checklist (b) and the N of P, this Project DOES include recreational facilities which COULD likely have an adverse physical effect on the environment, ( particularly the water in the wave pool / basin ). Other proposed activities include "hiking, biking and ropes courses". Will these have the potential to damage Coral Mountain and its terrain, as well as its paleontological and archeological amenities. For example, could this Project damage the "Ancient Coral Reef" - either during construction or during its operation. Why was the decision made the decision to exclude this EIR Category: RECREATION from the EIR ? N. EIR Category - Transportation ( including traffic) The following is stated in the N of P... the City is ... preparing a traffic impact analysis, vehicle miles traveled analysis, and Hazard Assessment- ... The project will generate trips associated with residential, commercial and resort development, which could impact the City's circulation system. ... In addition, the project includes special events at the wave basin facility which would result in increases in trip generation during short periods of time. Comments and Questions are: TRAFFIC is one of my and my fellow residents' greatest concerns and its impact on the residential neighbourhoods that surround the proposed Project MUST please be considered in a fulsome manner. Undoubtedly, we will see and be subject to an increase in traffic as would be expected to occur when a commercial venture is "inserted" into what was originally zoned as a residential area. 618 Some auestions and concerns at this time are listed here and undoubtedly more will present as we receive more information: 1. Does the developer intend to use the main roadway and entrance into the development as the main thoroughfare for construction vehicles and equipment, resulting in disruption to the local residents and traffic patterns throughout the area ? 2. The main entrance into the Surf Park development is only from the south -bound lanes of Madison, south of the intersection of 58th Street. How does the developer plan to allow vehicles to egress when there is a landscaped median preventing exiting in a north -bound direction? Will this require vehicles to perform a U-turn at the intersection of Madison and 60th Street? If the developer plans on modifying the median to allow this turn in the north -bound direction, how is this feat accomplished so close to the intersection? Will the 58th Street and Madison intersection require a signal system in all directions? 3. We have no public transportation in this area ... what is the impact of this on the traffic impact analysis ? 4. Because of the sub -phase development proposal we will have increased construction traffic for YEARS 5. Who will pay for these modifications ? 6. Can the Project provide adequate parking and other needs for all planned activities, including Special events on site; if not, why would this be acceptable ? O. EIR Category - Utilities and Service Systems The following is stated in the N of P... ... The development of the proposed Coral Mountain Resort project would increase the demand for utilities in the City. The service, location, timing and construction of on- and off -site improvements required for all utilities will be included in the EIR analysis. The project will require two well sites to adequately serve the site. The OR and DRAFT EIR will address the following: The City determined that the proposed project requires the preparation and approval of a Water Supply Assessment and Water Supply Verification .. The well sites will be located within the project's existing footprint and will be analyzed in the EIR. ... stormwater management ( linked to Hydrology and Water Quality Section of EIR J 619 ... The service, location, timing and construction of on- and off -site improvements required for all utilities will be included in the EIR analysis. ... Project design features and mitigation measures during construction and operation would be identified in the Draft EIR. Comments and Questions are: It is hoped that the EIR will be fulsome and address the following: 1. That there is and can be sufficient capacity in the current or expanded utility network to accommodate the additional load placed by this Project - during Construction and when Operational - including anticipated sub -phase loads. 2. Is it possible or anticipated that there will be further "incremental' infrastructure required for adequate utility delivery ? In other words, the Developer wants to develop in sub phases - do we need to incrementally add on to existing utilities network. This could be expensive so who will pay for this ? 3. What happens if the resort is not completed or not fully developed and we have bought and paid for all of this ? A EIR Category - Mandatory Findings of Significance Although this Category is not addressed in the N of P, it is referenced in the CEQA Appendix G Checklist. I will close my comments and auestions with the following: In my opinion, I believe that this PROJECT has impacts that may be viewed as individually limited, but when one stands back and assesses, these are cumulatively considerable. There is no other Project like this in our desert to currently compare to. In my opinion, there are many potential environmental effects that could adversely affect the residents of the communities around it; many of which I have provided my opinion on in the foregoing document. I am emphatically NOT in favour of this Project with its proposed entitlement changes as well as the potential and identified environmental impacts laid out herein. Thank you very much for your consideration of my comments. Diane Rebryna, 60149 Honeysuckle Street La Quinta, CA 92253 1(403) 870 2109 620 Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 09:22:59 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Water Park Objection Date: Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 1:46:47 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Sharisse Rehiring To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste We are owners and residents of the Andalusia community and both have deep concerns about the planned water park and want to voice the following objections, shared by many in our community. We would like this to remain a low impact residential area and feel this high impact commercial plan is extraordinarily disruptive to our community: 1. Light pollution. This tract is in one of the last unspoiled areas of La Quinta where total darkness survives and our Andalusian observation of the beautiful desert night sky is uncompromised. This project proposes the installation of 80 ft high light poles all along the wave trench to allow for nighttime commercial activity which will likely completely obliterate the night sky. The area where the poles will sit is already about 20ft higher than Andalusia, which increases the likelihood that the emitted light will shine straight into our development. All desert cities have specific and strict rules on light pollution, so how come this can be tolerated by the city planners? And make no mistake, this will be 7 days per week all year long. 2. Traffic and visual pollution. This tract was zoned to be a low density residential area (with full golf) and this new proposal will create substantial additional traffic to/from a full fledged commercial sports complex, hotel, multiple restaurants and higher density residential housing (up to 600 units — many likely short term rentals). The hotel, which was originally presented as two story maximum, is now planned as 4-story and will obstruct view of Coral Mountain from pretty much every residence with that view. Traffic on Madison will increase by many hundreds of vehicles. 3. Noise pollution. The proposed wave equipment generates substantial and constant noise (minimum 75 decibels) that will travel far in the desert and is pretty much as if you are living next to a busy freeway. The developers admit that the wave operation will involve loudspeaker announcement of every wave. Noise pollution should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12. 4. Seismic disturbance. The proposed wave equipment by its very nature generates vibration (not to mention the additional seismic disturbance generated by the resulting wave crashing) which will easily travel long distances in the loose desert soil. Pool and jacuzzi leaks for the neighboring properties will not be far behind. Seismic disturbance should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12. 5. Quality of life reduction. The hours of operation of this facility have been insufficiently clarified but there is a distinct impression the wave operation may be started as early as 6 in the morning and go well into the night? This should be considered unacceptable in a once peaceful residential area. It totally ignores the original zoning intent for this tract. The zoning change request should be more thoroughly investigated and the change to commercial should be opposed. Sharisse and Thomas Rehring 81585 Ronda La Quinta 92253 720-218-3480 H303-888-1998 62,Page 1 of 1 Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, Ca. 92253, Sent via Email consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste: I am the owner of a single-family home, 81-357 Andalusia Drive, in the Andalusia at Coral Mountain community. I am writing today to express my deep concern about the proposed amendments to the Coral Mountain Resort proposed development near my home. This project will undoubtedly destroy the natural beauty of the Coral Mountains that draw so many visitors to our beautiful city and will have detrimental environmental and economic impacts to the areas surrounding the project. This project does not serve ANY of the goals that are listed in the "Notice of Preparation. The first goal listed is "To implement a plan that recognizes and responds to the natural and aesthetic character of the property." There is nothing about a man-made surf park and resort that is natural to the aesthetic of desert mountains. The property in question is zoned for low -density single homes with a golf course. As seen throughout the Coachella Valley, low -density homes and golf courses can be designed to have a natural aesthetic that complements the nature surrounding them. However, the proposed development of the property in question has no ability to "respond to the natural and aesthetic character of the property", as surfing, 80 foot high light towers, loud public announcement speakers, and four story hotels are wholly unnatural to desert regions. The City of La Quinta should be focused on preserving the immense natural beauty that surrounds it. Instead, the City is ramming through a large development project that is not natural to its environment, nor will it serve any of the city's existing residents. This project will be extremely disruptive to the environment and to city residents. Loud noises after sunset, 8-story high light towers, and vibrations from the wave pool itself will completely ruin the entire environment that have drawn so many residents and tourists alike to the area; not to mention the enormous potential damage, both real and economic, to properties surrounding this proposed project. This project should be wholly rejected, and the property in question should be developed as it is currently zoned. Sincerely, Lisa Reinhard 622 Monday, March 29, 2021 at 12:28:32 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: proposed wave park across form Andalusia golf Community Date: Monday, March 29, 2021 at 12:22:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Mike Riley To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Attachments: image001.jpg Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta- Please review this project plan with these issues that relate to us in our community across the street. Following also a short summary of issues: Light pollution. This tract is in one of the last unspoiled areas of La Quinta where total darkness survives and our Andalusian observation of the beautiful desert night sky is uncompromised. This project proposes the installation of 80 ft high light poles all along the wave trench to allow for nighttime commercial activity which will likely completely obliterate the night sky. The area where the poles will sit is already about 20ft higher than Andalusia, which increases the likelihood that the emitted light will shine straight into our development. All desert cities have specific and strict rules on light pollution, so how come this can be tolerated by the city planners? And make no mistake, this will be 7 days per week all year long. Traffic and visual pollution. This tract was zoned to be a low density residential area (with full golf) and this new proposal will create substantial additional traffic to/from a full fledged commercial sports complex, hotel, multiple restaurants and higher density residential housing (up to 600 units — many likely short term rentals). The hotel, which was originally presented as two story maximum, is now planned as 4-story and will obstruct view of Coral Mountain from pretty much every residence with that view. Traffic on Madison will increase by many hundreds of vehicles. Noise pollution. The proposed wave equipment generates substantial and constant noise (minimum 75 decibels) that will travel far in the desert and is pretty much as if you are living next to a busy freeway. The developers admit that the wave operation will involve loudspeaker announcement of every wave. Noise pollution should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12. 4. Seismic disturbance. The proposed wave equipment by its very nature generates vibration (not to mention the additional seismic disturbance generated by the resulting wave crashing) which will easily travel long distances in the loose desert soil. Pool and jacuzzi leaks for the neighboring properties will not be far behind. Seismic disturbance should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12. Quality of life reduction. The hours of operation of this facility have been insufficiently clarified but there is a distinct impression the wave operation may be started as early as 6 in the morning and go well into the night? This should be considered unacceptable in a once peaceful residential area where the only disturbance might be an errand golf ball. It totally ignores the original zoning intent for this tract. The zoning change request should be more thoroughly investigated and the change to commercial should be opposed. 62Tage 1 of 2 Thanks for taking the time to read this request for help. We hope you will join us in ensuring our way of life at Andalusia is not negatively impacted, not to mention the value of our properties. Mike and Tracy Riley 58475 Carmona La Quinta 909-208-5065 Mike Riley RILEY electric, Inc. (909)981-6110 Fax (909)982-7599 1800 W. 11th St. Unit C, Upland, Ca 91786 www.rileyelectricinc.com 624Page 2 of 2 Monday, March 15, 2021 at 13:29:33 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave park Development Date: Monday, March 15, 2021 at 1:20:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Isabel Roberts To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste Hi Ms Criste: I usually don't write letters to persons making decisions for new projects coming into our community. I always assume the people in charge have our best interest in mind when making decisions that have an impact on so many. BUT this time I feel it is so important that you hear from us, the community of many that will negatively affected by this Wave Park Development. A project like this will have such a catastrophic affect on so many levels, for the residents, the environment, for our way of life, it can not happen. I won't go into the long list of how it would affect everyone, I'm sure you know. All I ask is that you please dig deep in your heart, and realize how much is at risk here in this beautiful desert we call La Quinta! Thank you, Isabel Roberts Trilogy Sent from my iPad 625Page 1 of 1 Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 13:01:23 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: proposed Coral Mountain zoning Change Date: Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 12:55:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: farhoco@aol.com To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov our names are Frank &Sandy Rossi and we reside at 79500- Tom Fazio Ln N. in the Quarry development in La Quinta. We have been at this address for 16 years and prior to then for 25 years we owned a residence on Coachella Drive in the La Quinta CC.I guess one could say we have shown a long term commitment to La Quinta During our years in LaQuinta we have been very satisfied with the way city leaders have operated to respect the interests of residents, guests, and visitors. We are writing to you to express our very grave concern for the proposed zoning change at the Coral mountai development from low density residential to Resort, Commercial. This change would not at all be compatiblewith the IowlDensity surrounding neighborhood or and the natural flow of the desert floor enviroment to the slopes of the Santa Rosa Mountains. At onepoint, the management of this proposed project represented they planned this to be a high end residential community compatible with surrounding properties, but now appears to be morphing into aShort term rental , commercial proposition From what we understand of the project, there is nothing but negatives(noise,air, traffic light and mutiple pollution factors) that would affect the Quarry and other surrounding properties. This project would in no way be compatible with the Coral Mountain location. We could go on and on with a litany of concerns about the negative impact on our property and enjoyment of the serenity it provides, but our main point to you is to express our strong opposition to the proposed zoning change and proposed project at Coral mountain. Frank Rossi is our contact person at 760-564-8630. We appreciate your consideration of our viewpoint as we have no desire to have to think abou to change of residence, but if this project is approved and proceeds forward we believe it is a consideration we will have to make. Thank you for taking the time to carefully consider our views on this matter. Sincerely Frank &Sandy Rossi 62EPage 1 of 1 Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 09:26:48 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: As residents of Andalusia Country Club, we oppose current Wave Park plans Date: Saturday, March 20, 2021 at 11:15:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Rick Roth To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner, City of La Quinta, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, Ca. 92253 Dear Ms. Criste, We attented a briefing on the project last year provided by the developer and followed by a walk-through. They have apparently done a bait -and -switch. We were told that the planned hotel would be a maximum of 25 feet high and would not impede our views of Coral Mountain. We were not informed about 80' high light towers that would destroy the dark night skies. Nor were we told about constant noise from loudspeakers announcing each arriving wave or any plans for large crowd events. In short, we were told the property would be for residents only and would not disturb our existing residential neighborhood, quiet, or dark night skies. We oppose a zoning change from low impact residential to high impact commercial use. How does this occur with clear negative impacts on the existing neighbors? We anticipate incurring losses from reductions in our quality of life, reduced property value, and increases in noise, traffic and light pollution. Those were the essential objectives that made us purchase our home in this part of La Quinta. Thank you for your attention to these concerns, Rick and Suzanne Roth 58002 Aracena 760-564-8499 home 650-817-5009 Rick mobile 627Page 1 of 1 Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 March 14, 2021 RECEIVED MAR 19 2021 CITY OF LA QUINTA DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT I am writing today as a Trilogy La Quinta resident to voice my opposition to the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort development in La Quinta. Below is the summary of the development as presented by Meriwether Development, published press releases, and local newspaper articles: Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort will be a mega resort for over 4,800 overnight tourists, with a 17- Acre Wave Pool as the main attraction. 1. The Coral Mountain Resort will not be a residential neighborhood as it is currently zoned. It instead will be a high energy Resort containing a 600+ person occupancy hotel complete with restaurants, bars, and entertainment all available on a per night basis. 2. The 600 "Dwelling Units" with unlimited number of bedrooms & bathrooms available for overnight rental, could easily have 4 bedrooms, allowing 8 guests per unit. 600 Units x 8 people= 4,800 people potentially staying in the Units. All units are available on an overnight Basis the same as the Hotel. The people coming to Coral Mountain are Vacationers, not Residents. 3. The Wave Park Coral Mountain will not be a Residential Neighborhood. This will be a commercial Resort with The Wave Park as the main feature. 4. The Wave Pool will cover 17 acres, a length of 2,600 feet, needing 18 million gallons of water to work. The Wave Pool water evaporation rate is 30,000 to 180,000 gallons of water daily. Plans include stadium bleacher seating on each long side, and many 80' tall stadium- style lighting towers for Night Surfing. Land subsidence from depletion of our water table is a significant issue. Taking water from Lake Mead and the Colorado River is an ethically and environmentally reprehensible and unacceptable solution that we have already implemented to refill our water table. Now we want to plan to take more harmful measures by implementing the Wave Park? 5. Plans have the Wave Pool running 365 days a year from 7 am to 7 pm (some newspaper articles have stated it will run nightly until 10 pm) for the 4,800 tourists staying at the hotel or in a dwelling unit. 6. Loudspeakers projecting above The Wave Pool in all directions are needed for the Wave Pool Announcer to call the 30 second countdown for every single wave with up to 12 waves per hour. The surfer needs to be alerted for the coming Wave, as there is no Ocean to watch or feel until "the big one" comes. A Wave is manufactured every 5 to 6 minutes. The noise level of the Wave crashing has been measured at 75 decibels at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch. This noise level is comparable to the sound of cars traveling on a busy interstate highway. The generators creating the waves will be running non-stop, every day. 7. Plans include Music Stages for Entertainment at each end of The Wave Pool, and other locations in the Resort. 8. In addition to the Wave Pool, there will be more artificial lagoons and lakes for E-Foiling (a motorized hydrofoil paddle board that you stand on, not lie on) and Stand -Up paddle boarding. 9. Concrete sports parks for the Bike park with pump tracks for skateboarding, BMX, and mountain bikes — all with stadium style light towers. So much for La Quinta's magical views and atmosphere. 10. Coral Mountain Resort has requested 16 days and nights for Special Events. 16 days is more days than Coachella Fest and Stagecoach combined! To make matters worse, the 16 days are spread out over four 4- day long weekends. Set up and take down for each Special Event Weekend will easily add another 32 days of high traffic conditions. 11. The 80' tall stadium style light towers illuminating The Wave Pool, swimming pools, Skateboard Park, BMX Track, other Sports Courts, acres of parking lots, streets, and 117,000 square feet of Commercial Buildings will be lit inside and out. The spill lighting will affect the surrounding community. No more dark skies....What has happened to La Quinta's anti -light pollution stance? 12. The approval of this project will permanently bring light pollution, noise, and traffic. There will be permanent and on -going noise from the wave generators, breaking waves, the lodgers, guests, loudspeakers and entertainment venues on -site every day until late in the evening. 13. Heavy Construction equipment will be working at 85 decibels or more, non- stop all day long, for the next 10-20 years- (according to Coral Mountain developers own projection). Property values cannot be sustained with the long term pollution, noise, and traffic of the Wave Park. Lower property values will lower property taxes and La Quinta's financial health. 14. The project will scrape away every inch of" biocrust", creating the need for even more Water Trucks to keep the dust down. "Biocrust "is to the Desert what "Tundra" is to the high elevations. Both tundra and biocrust take many hundreds of years to replace once damaged. Think of the impact on the Deserts already questionable water supply as just 2 years ago we were asked to dramatically cut back on water usage. Demands for water will only increase in future years. 15. This project will forever mar the stunning natural topography of the area, forever erasing the absolute silent evenings and dark skies enjoyed currently by all residents of the area. This Coral Mountain Resort project does not have any of the characteristics of the surrounding low- density up -scale residential neighborhoods. This is a Mega Resort, not a residential neighborhood. This type of development is completely not compatible with any of the surrounding neighborhoods for miles in every direction. City Planners and City Counsel Members, ask yourself, would you want to live next door to a Water Sports-Themed Amusement Park with 80 foot high stadium 629 lighting, noise from concert venues, BMX motor bike racing, and wave machines and traffic 24/7? The approval of the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Amusement Park style Resort will permanently cause the irreplaceable loss of the peaceful, quiet, serene atmosphere that this part of La Quinta is renowned for. Allowing this extremely large Tourist/Commercial Resort into our quiet low -density residential, golf -oriented neighborhoods, will negatively affect every Homeowner for miles around. There will be no coming back. The value of our homes and the quality of life of living and being in the "Quite Zone" of La Quinta will be forever degraded. I urge the City of La Quinta NOT to change the zoning from the current designation Low -Density Residential w/ 18-hole golf course to TOURIST/ COMMERCIAL. I urge you not to allow Short Term Vacation Rentals (STVR) and the problems that accompany them. This proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort is exactly the WRONG type of develop for this location. You are literally planning to drop a tourist amusement park resort in the middle of a quiet residential zone. Please do not allow this project to move forward. Sincerely, Trilogy Resident Richard Rous 60562 White Sage Dr La Quinta, CA 92253 rrous221 2yahoo.com 630 Monday, March 15, 2021 at 07:47:34 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Objection to Coral Mountain Wave Park Development Date: Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 4:48:45 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Robert Runge To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: bobrunge@gmail.com Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 March 14, 2021 I am writing today as a Trilogy La Quinta resident to voice my opposition to the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort development in La Quinta. Below is the summary of the development as presented by Meriwether Development, published press releases, and local newspaper articles: Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort will be a mega resort for over 4,800 overnight tourists, with a 17- Acre Wave Pool as the main attraction. 1. The Coral Mountain Resort will not be a residential neighborhood as it is currently zoned. It instead will be a high energy Resort containing a 600+ person occupancy hotel complete with restaurants, bars, and entertainment all available on a per night basis. 2. The 600 "Dwelling Units" with unlimited number of bedrooms & bathrooms available for overnight rental, could easily have 4 bedrooms, allowing 8 guests per unit. 600 Units x 8 people= 4,800 people potentially staying in the Units. All units are available on an overnight Basis the same as the Hotel. The people coming to Coral Mountain are Vacationers, not Residents. 3. The Wave Park Coral Mountain will not be a Residential Neighborhood. This will be a commercial Resort with The Wave Park as the main feature. 4. The Wave Pool will cover 17 acres, a length of 2,600 feet, needing 18 million gallons of water to work. The Wave Pool water evaporation rate is 30,000 to 180,000 gallons of water daily. Plans include stadium bleacher seating on each long side, and many 80' tall stadium- style lighting towers for Night Surfing. 5. Plans have the Wave Pool running 365 days a year from 7 am to 7 pm (some newspaper articles have stated it will run nightly until 10 pm) for the 4,800 tourists staying at the hotel or in a dwelling unit. 6. Loudspeakers projecting above The Wave Pool in all directions are needed for the Wave Pool Announcer to call the 30 second countdown for every single wave with up to 12 waves per hour. The surfer needs to be alerted for the coming Wave, as there is no Ocean to watch or feel until "the big one" comes. A Wave is manufactured every 5 to 6 minutes. The noise level of the Wave crashing has been measured at 75 decibels at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch. This noise level is comparable to the sound of cars traveling on a busy interstate highway. The generators creating the waves will be running non-stop, every day. 7. Plans include Music Stages for Entertainment at each end of The Wave Pool, and other locations in the Resort. 63,Page 1 of 3 8. In addition to the Wave Pool, there will be more artificial lagoons and lakes for E-Foiling (a motorized hydrofoil paddle board that you stand on, not lie on) and Stand -Up paddle boarding. 9. Concrete sports parks for the Bike park with pump tracks for skateboarding, BMX, and mountain bikes - all with stadium style light towers. 10. Coral Mountain Resort has requested 16 days and nights for Special Events. 16 days is more days than Coachella Fest and Stagecoach combined! To make matters worse, the 16 days are spread out over four 4- day long weekends. Set up and take down for each Special Event Weekend will easily add another 32 days of high traffic conditions. 11. The 80' tall stadium style light towers illuminating The Wave Pool, swimming pools, Skateboard Park, BMX Track, other Sports Courts, acres of parking lots, streets, and 117,000 square feet of Commercial Buildings will be lit inside and out. The spill lighting will affect the surrounding community. No more dark skies. 12. The approval of this project will permanently bring light pollution, noise, and traffic. There will be permanent and on -going noise from the wave generators, breaking waves, the lodgers, guests, loudspeakers and entertainment venues on -site every day until late in the evening. 13. Heavy Construction equipment will be working at 85 decibels or more, non-stop all day long, for the next 10-20 years- (according to Coral Mountain developers own projection). 14. The project will scrape away every inch of" biocrust", creating the need for even more Water Trucks to keep the dust down. "Biocrust "is to the Desert what "Tundra" is to the high elevations. Both tundra and biocrust take many hundreds of years to replace once damaged. Think of the impact on the Deserts already questionable water supply as just 2 years ago we were asked to dramatically cut back on water usage. Demands for water will only increase in future years. 15. This project will forever mar the stunning natural topography of the area, forever erasing the absolute silent evenings and dark skies enjoyed currently by all residents of the area. This Coral Mountain Resort project does not have any of the characteristics of the surrounding low- density up- scale residential neighborhoods. This is a Mega Resort, not a residential neighborhood. This type of development is completely not compatible with any of the surrounding neighborhoods for miles in every direction. City Planners and City Counsel Members, ask yourself, would you want to live next door to a Water Sports- Themed Amusement Park with 80 foot high stadium lighting, noise from concert venues, BMX motor bike racing, and wave machines and traffic 24/7? The approval of the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Amusement Park style Resort will permanently cause the irreplaceable loss of the peaceful, quiet, serene atmosphere that this part of La Quinta is renowned for. Allowing this extremely large Tourist/Commercial Resort into our quiet low- density residential, golf -oriented neighborhoods, will negatively affect every Homeowner for miles around. There will be no coming back. The value of our homes and the quality of life of living and being in the "Quite Zone" of La Quinta will be forever degraded. I urge the City of La Quinta NOT to change the zoning from the current designation Low -Density Residential w/ 18-hole golf course to TOURIST/COMMERCIAL . I urge you not to allow Short Term Vacation Rentals (STVR) and the problems that accompany them. This proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort is exactly the WRONG type of develop for this location. You are literally planning to drop a tourist amusement park resort in the middle of a quiet residential zone. Please do not allow this project to move forward. Sincerely, Trilogy Homeowners 63Tage 2 of 3 Robert and Nancy Runge 81555 Monarch Ct. La Quinta, CA 92253 63Yage 3 of 3 Monday, March 22, 2021 at 06:40:58 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Date: Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 1:57:02 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Al Russello To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Ms. Christe, We are very concerned after reading the Coral Mountain Resort Notice of Preparation. When the developer presented the initial project to the homeowners at Andalusia, he indicated that it would be a low density high end residential community with a two story exclusive hotel and surf park. There was no mention of 80' light standards or the noise and vibration from the surf park. We purchased our home in Andalusia because we love the tranquility, peacefulness and uncongested traffic in our area. We knew that the Coral Mountain Resort site would eventually be developed, but assumed that development would be a low density golf community. We ask that you please thoroughly investigate all the issues that negatively impact the Andalusia community and do not change the current zoning to allow the Coral Mountain Resort and commercial development. Thank you, Al and Ann Russel% 58420 Mijas La Quinta, CA 92253 760.296.1322 russelloa@gmail.com 634Page 1 of 1 MICHAEL & PAULA SEIBEL 81671 ANDALUSIA. LA QUINTA, CA 92253 MPSEIBELCIME.COM 707-787 7242 22 March 2021 Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta La Quinta, CA 92253 Subj.- Notice of Preparation - Coral Mountain Resort Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste; We are permanent year-round residents in the Andalusia at Coral Mountain development. When we purchased our home in May of 2018 we purposely researched the environmental conditions in and around the Andalusia development by studying , among others, the then existing and approved Andalusia Specific Plan, in order to ascertain that our most important requirement for quiet and nature -connected living would be met. The changes now under consideration. as set forth in the Notice of Preparation dated 17 February 2021, present in our view an unacceptably drastic change from the the original plan we relied upon on in 2018. We therefore wish to place on record our objections to the presented project in general, and to the specific entitlement applications- General Plan amendment (GPA 2019-0002; Zone Change (ZC2019-0004); Specific Plan Amendment to SP03-067; Specific Plan (SP2019-003): Tentative Tract Map (TTM 2019-0005) and the Site Development Plan. All of these plans propose changes seemingly without any consideration given to environment and to nature. Currently beautiful and still relatively unobstructed views mountains and the night time sky would be largely destroyed by the hight of the proposed hotel and the lighting masts that are to serve the wave pool. An all -year close to 24/7 operation of the sporting facility would noticeably and substantially impact the very quiet atmosphere the neighboring residential areas currently enjoy. All residential communities along the more Southern blocks of both Madison and Monroe Streets would be subjected to a substantial increase in road traffic and suffer the associated increase in noise and air pollution, particularly during times of the apparently planned large events at the proposed site. We respectfully request that the City of La Quinta fully consider our objection(s) when determining the scope of the Environmental Impact Report. Z/ Sincerely. Micha P. Seibel 635 Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 12:53:46 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Resort Project Date: Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 12:34:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Michael P. Seibel To: Consulting Planner Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste; Thank you for hosting that very interesting meeting last Tuesday. One additional point for consideration in your EIR would be impact that the movement of construction equipment and material would have on the roads and the general environment around the proposed development site, specifically the massive amount of cement and gravel necessary to build the wave pool basin. Please be so kind to make sure that I will be on your department's mailing list for all future notifications and publications concerning this project. Best regards. Michael P. Seibel 81671 Andalusia La Quinta, CA 92253 mpseibel@me.com (707) 787 7242 On Mar 23, 2021, at 4:42 PM, Consulting Planner<ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Mr. Seibel, Thank you for your comments. They will be included in the EIR Notice of Preparation comments for the project. We have added a Scoping Meeting on March 30 at 4 PM. I have attached the Notice, which includes instructions on receiving the Zoom link if you would like to participate. If you would like to watch the meeting but not speak, it will also be livestreamed on the City's website. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: Michael P. Seibel <mpseibel@me.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 20212:26 PM To: Consulting Planner<ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Coral Mountain Resort Project EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. 63EPage 1 of 2 Attn. Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta, CA92253 Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste; I would be very grateful if you could please acknowledge receipt of this email and the attached letter, so that I can rest assured that I have met your extended deadline of 02 April 21 for this communication. Thank you very much. Michael P. Seibel <Coral Mountain Resort Scoping Meeting Ad 3.17.21.pdf> 637Page 2 of 2 Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 12:29:11 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 9:34:44 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Henry Siegel To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Simply.. a zoning change to permit the proposed Coral Mountain development would be catastrophic not just to the residential nature of that area but also commercially, environmentally, culturally. There are numerous areas in that part of the State that are more favorable to what is being considered. Please exercise good judgement with regard to future generations going forward. Thank you. Henry Siegel hjsiegell@yahoo.com 303 435-7258 63EPage 1 of 1 Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 13:23:59 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Proposed Wave Park Development - Coral Mountain Resort Date: Thursday, March 25, 2021 at 1:01:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Caroline Simmons To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: jrose@buchalter.com bear Ms. Criste: My name is Caroline Rose Simmons. I own property at 59595 Seville, La Quinta in the Andalusia development. I've recently learned of the proposed Coral Mountain Resort project. In order for the City to approve this project it must approve a General Plan Amendment, a Zoning Amendment, and a Specific Plan Amendment, all of which materially vary and are in fact in direct conflict with the current General Plan Requirements and Zoning Plan Requirements for this area. The material impacts that this development will have on our quiet residential community defies explanation. ] am voicing my strongest objection to this project. Some of the project highlights that are of the most concern to me are the four story hotel which will block the view of the Santa Rosa Mountains to all residents at the Andalusia development, up to 600 new residential units, 80 foot high light towers along a length of about 8 football fields, and loud speakers at the wave park. This view, air, light, traffic, and noise pollution will materially affect the quality of life and create an ongoing public and private nuisance. The material impacts that this project will have simply cannot be mitigated. I am copying my attorney on this e-mail and should this project be approved by the City I will file an action an action against the City of La Quinta. Please put me on any notices for any public hearings so that my attorney and I can be present. Respecfully, Caroline Simmons CSimmonsl0s@aol.com 63911age 1 of 1 Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 12:39:37 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Wave Project Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 11:59:14 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Anne Smith To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Hello, My husband, Ron Smith, and I moved into our home in Trilogy, La Quinta last July of 2020. We love it here. We bought our home due to the beauty, the peace and quiet, the lovely dark sky at night, and an easy drive into town with light traffic. We have just heard about the prospective Wave Theme Park to be built in the area adjacent to Trilogy, and are extremely alarmed by the thought that this development could be on our doorstep. The thought of 10-20 years of construction ahead is unimaginable. All of the dust and noise and traffic on this pristine spot with fragile petroglyphs is horrifying. Even more horrifying is the thought of hearing the wave machine going off 12 hours a day. Noise bounces and echoes off the rocks and mountains here already. I am a half mile away from the pickle ball court, and can easily hear the balls bouncing. Cannot imagine what the sound of an industrial water machine will do. It will be like living next to a freeway. A nightmare. EVERYTHING about this project sounds WRONG for the area. I fear for our home equity, and if we are able, we will put our house on the market if the project is approved. If the land is developed at all, it should be as a high end residential community like current neighborhoods. PLEASE, please, do not let this project go through! Thank you for reading. Hoping our voices will be heard, Anne and Ron Smith 61120 Topaz Drive La Quinta, CA. 92253 d Virus -free. www.avast.com 64(Page 1 of 1 Monday, March 15, 2021 at 12:42:40 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Objection to Coral Mountain Wave Park Development Date: Monday, March 15, 2021 at 12:21:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Dave Smith To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: levans@laquintaca.gov Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste, I live in the Trilogy La Quinta community and have become aware of the Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort development in La Quinta that, I understand, may be discussed at the March 16th, 2021 La Quinta City Council Meeting. One of my fellow residents has summarized the characteristics of this development as presented by Meriwether Development, published press releases, and local newspaper articles. These characteristics are included in the following comments: Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort will be a mega resort for over 4,800 overnight tourists, with a 17- Acre Wave Pool as the main attraction. 1. The Coral Mountain Resort will not be a residential neighborhood as it is currently zoned. It instead will be a high energy Resort containing a 600+ person occupancy hotel complete with restaurants, bars, and entertainment all available on a per night basis. 2. The 600 "Dwelling Units" with unlimited number of bedrooms & bathrooms available for overnight rental, could easily have 4 bedrooms, allowing 8 guests per unit. 600 Units x 8 people= 4,800 people potentially staying in the Units. All units are available on an overnight Basis the same as the Hotel. The people coming to Coral Mountain are Vacationers, not Residents. 3. The Wave Park Coral Mountain will not be a Residential Neighborhood. This will be a commercial Resort with The Wave Park as the main feature. 4. The Wave Pool will cover 17 acres, a length of 2,600 feet, needing 18 million gallons of water to work. The Wave Pool water evaporation rate is 30,000 to 180,000 gallons of water daily. Plans include stadium bleacher seating on each long side, and many 80' tall stadium - style lighting towers for Night Surfing. 5. Plans have the Wave Pool running 365 days a year from 7 am to 7 pm (some newspaper articles have stated it will run nightly until 10 pm) for the 4,800 tourists staying at the hotel or in a dwelling unit. 6. Loudspeakers projecting above The Wave Pool in all directions are needed for the Wave Pool Announcer to call the 30 second countdown for every single wave with up to 12 waves per hour. The surfer needs to be alerted for the coming Wave, as there is no Ocean to watch or feel until "the big one" comes. A Wave is manufactured every 5 to 6 minutes. The noise level of the Wave crashing has been measured at 75 decibels at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch. This noise level is comparable to the sound of cars traveling on a busy interstate highway. The generators creating the waves will be running non-stop, every day. 64-Page 1 of 3 7. Plans include Music Stages for Entertainment at each end of The Wave Pool, and other locations in the Resort. 8. In addition to the Wave Pool, there will be more artificial lagoons and lakes for E-Foiling (a motorized hydrofoil paddle board that you stand on, not lie on) and Stand -Up paddle boarding. 9. Concrete sports parks for the Bike park with pump tracks for skateboarding, BMX, and mountain bikes - all with stadium style light towers. 10. Coral Mountain Resort has requested 16 days and nights for Special Events. 16 days is more days than Coachella Fest and Stagecoach combined! To make matters worse, the 16 days are spread out over four 4- day long weekends. Set up and take down for each Special Event Weekend will easily add another 32 days of high traffic conditions. 11. The 80' tall stadium style light towers illuminating The Wave Pool, swimming pools, Skateboard Park, BMX Track, other Sports Courts, acres of parking lots, streets, and 117,000 square feet of Commercial Buildings will be lit inside and out. The spill lighting will affect the surrounding community. No more dark skies. 12. The approval of this project will permanently bring light pollution, noise, and traffic. There will be permanent and on -going noise from the wave generators, breaking waves, the lodgers, guests, loudspeakers and entertainment venues on -site every day until late in the evening. 13. Heavy Construction equipment will be working at 85 decibels or more, non-stop all day long, for the next 10-20 years- (according to Coral Mountain developers own projection). 14. The project will scrape away every inch of" biocrust", creating the need for even more Water Trucks to keep the dust down. "Biocrust "is to the Desert what "Tundra" is to the high elevations. Both tundra and biocrust take many hundreds of years to replace once damaged. Think of the impact on the Deserts already questionable water supply as just 2 years ago we were asked to dramatically cut back on water usage. Demands for water will only increase in future years. 15. This project will forever mar the stunning natural topography of the area, forever erasing the absolute silent evenings and dark skies enjoyed currently by all residents of the area. Please note that I oppose any Council action to change the zoning of the area involved from its current zoning as a Residential Neighborhood for the purpose of accommodating the development characterized above. I have resided in this lovely city for over ten years and I would re -consider La Quinta as my permanent residence should a development like the above move forward. I urge the City of La Quinta NOT to change the zoning from the current designation Low - Density Residential w/ 18-hole golf course to TOURIST/COMMERCIAL . I urge you not to allow Short Term Vacation Rentals (STVR) and the problems that accompany them. Sincerely, Dave Smith 642Page 2 of 3 81522 Castlerock Ct La Quinta, CA 92253 Phone: 562-279-4603 64Yage 3 of 3 Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 08:48:30 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Wave Park Bad Idea Date: Saturday, March 6, 2021 at 9:32:20 AM Pacific Standard Time From: John Spath To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov I'm a Trilogy resident. The adverse effects of the development on surrounding communities is unbelievable. It has to be stopped John Spath 644Page 1 of 1 Monday, March 8, 2021 at 07:48:11 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Re: Wave Park Bad Idea Date: Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 11:26:21 AM Pacific Standard Time From: John Spath To: Consulting Planner Can we get an absolute 100% guarantee that noise from the water park, loudspeakers and traffic will not impact Trilogy John Spath On Mar 7, 2021, at 8:56 AM, Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Mr. Spath, Thank you for your comments. They will be included in the EIR Notice of Preparation comments for the project. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta From: John Spath <john.spath@icloud.com> Sent: Saturday, March 6, 2021 9:32 AM To: Consulting Planner <ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Wave Park Bad Idea ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** I'm a Trilogy resident. The adverse effects of the development on surrounding communities is unbelievable. It has to be stopped John Spath 645Page 1 of 1 Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 16:15:22 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Date: Saturday, March 27, 2021 at 12:23:27 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: SSTRATTON@dc.rr.com To: 'ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov' To Whom it may concern, I am an 11 year resident of Trilogy La Quinta, a 55+ Active Community. We are as far South as you can go in what I consider to be a fabulous city. I chose La Quinta, the Gem of the Desert because it is upscale. Old Town is a favorite spot. We have just about everything we need in this city. Now we have our own movie theater, which will re -open soon hopefully. A Wave Park does not fit with the image of our city. My home in particular faces 60 Avenue and I have a clear view of where this Wave Park would be built. I cannot believe that our City would permit this type of amusement park be built to destroy the quiet, upscale area where we live. For a multitude of reasons this should not be permitted. The noise and traffic would be on the top of my list of negatives, followed closely by the wasteful use of our precious water resources. We can hear the race cars at the Thermal Club while on our golf course. I can't even imagine the noise we would get from the wave machine which is just a block away. That land is right in the midst of Trilogy, Andalusia, the Quarry, PGA West. All of these are golf communities. I don't believe any would have residents who would use this park. This is a golf mecca not a surfing mecca. I moved from Manhattan Beach and there are surfers galore enjoying the Pacific Ocean. Anyone who wants a surfing vacation will go to the beach not the desert. I also absolutely do not believe that expensive homes would sell around an artificial surfing venue. This could end up being an unsightly relic and a blight on our neighborhoods. I understand that the developers have applied in just about every city in the Coachella Valley, hoping one would be approved. Let them go near the Thermal Club where land is readily available. It does not belong in a residential area period! This property is already zoned for residential and that is how it should remain. My husband and I strongly oppose the building of a Wave Park in the City of La Quinta. Sandra Stratton 81302 Barrel Cactus Rd La Quinta 64EPage 1 of 1 Friday, April 2, 2021 at 14:49:16 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave basin/pool Date: Friday, April 2, 2021 at 2:09:37 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Carol Strop To: Consulting Planner Hi Nicole, My name is Carol Strop. My husband, Richard Strop, and I live in Trilogy La Quinta. We missed the zoom meeting on March 30, 2021 but I am sure you have had much response related to the disruption of the residents' quality of life here, Big Horn sheep, and the Lake Cahuilla Campground. I only have a few brief comments. First, last night I researched Kelly Slater's Surf Ranch in Lemoore, CA. I read comments from the surfers themselves regarding the whine and noise of the machinery. It does not sound like something you would get used to. Then I looked at the area. The ranch sits out in the middle of wide open farm land. That is where it belongs, not in a high -end residential resort town amid many housing developments. Second, I believe the City would be gambling on the economic success of the development as proposed but I did not read any raving reviews of the wave. Additionally, the wealthy residents are likely to implement law suits against the City and the builder. Time and money lost for all. Third, does La Quinta not have any commercial open spaces to consider that would be better utilized for the Wave? And last, independent of short term rentals, traffic, etc., the main issue is the noise. Why not hire a van from a radio station, park it at the base of the mountains and test how the sound travels? Do it on a weekend when the residences are most likely to be occupied. You could station city employees to record the sound in the closest and furthest spots in every one of the surrounding developments, including the entrance to PGA West on 54th. Then blare away with music and a constant sound, perhaps a loud train recording, for an hour or two. Play the recordings for the council members and ask them if they would buy a home anywhere near here. Thanks for listening. I've been coming to the desert since I was a small child when there was nothing much between Palm Springs and Indio. It's wonderful how the valley has grown, especially La Quinta. I love living here. Carol Carol L. Strop, CPA, A Professional Corporation 60499 Juniper Lane La Quinta, CA 92253 760 445-9911 Cell 760 619-3372 (Fax) 647Page 1 of 1 Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 14:24:04 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Objection to Coral Mountain Wave Park Development Date: Sunday, March 14, 2021 at 11:16:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: JoAnne Thompson To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 March 14, 2021 Dear Ms. Criste, I am writing today as a Trilogy La Quinta resident to voice my opposition to the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort development in La Quinta. Below is the summary of the development as presented by Meriwether Development, published press releases, and local newspaper articles: Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort will be a mega resort for over 4,800 overnight tourists, with a 17- Acre Wave Pool as the main attraction. 1. The Coral Mountain Resort will not be a residential neighborhood as it is currently zoned. It instead will be a high energy Resort containing a 600+ person occupancy hotel complete with restaurants, bars, and entertainment all available on a per night basis. 2. The 600 "Dwelling Units" with unlimited number of bedrooms & bathrooms available for overnight rental, could easily have 4 bedrooms, allowing 8 guests per unit. 600 Units x 8 people= 4,800 people potentially staying in the Units. All units are available on an overnight Basis the same as the Hotel. The people coming to Coral Mountain are Vacationers, not Residents. 3. The Wave Park Coral Mountain will not be a Residential Neighborhood. This will be a commercial Resort with The Wave Park as the main feature. 4. The Wave Pool will cover 17 acres, a length of 2,600 feet, needing 18 million gallons of water to work. The Wave Pool water evaporation rate is 30,000 to 180,000 gallons of water daily. Plans include stadium bleacher seating on each long side, and many 80' tall stadium- style lighting towers for Night Surfing. 5. Plans have the Wave Pool running 365 days a year from 7 am to 7 pm (some newspaper articles have stated it will run nightly until 10 pm) for the 4,800 tourists staying at the hotel or in a dwelling unit. 6. Loudspeakers projecting above The Wave Pool in all directions are needed for the Wave Pool Announcer to call the 30 second countdown for every single wave with up to 12 waves per hour. The surfer needs to be alerted for the coming Wave, as there is no Ocean to watch or feel until "the big one" comes. A Wave is manufactured every 5 to 6 minutes. The noise level of the Wave crashing has been measured at 75 decibels at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch. This noise level is 64EPage 1 of 3 comparable to the sound of cars traveling on a busy interstate highway. The generators creating the waves will be running non-stop, every day. 7. Plans include Music Stages for Entertainment at each end of The Wave Pool, and other locations in the Resort. 8. In addition to the Wave Pool, there will be more artificial lagoons and lakes for E-Foiling (a motorized hydrofoil paddle board that you stand on, not lie on) and Stand -Up paddle boarding. 9. Concrete sports parks for the Bike park with pump tracks for skateboarding, BMX, and mountain bikes — all with stadium style light towers. 10. Coral Mountain Resort has requested 16 days and nights for Special Events. 16 days is more days than Coachella Fest and Stagecoach combined! To make matters worse, the 16 days are spread out over four 4- day long weekends. Set up and take down for each Special Event Weekend will easily add another 32 days of high traffic conditions. 11. The 80' tall stadium style light towers illuminating The Wave Pool, swimming pools, Skateboard Park, BMX Track, other Sports Courts, acres of parking lots, streets, and 117,000 square feet of Commercial Buildings will be lit inside and out. The spill lighting will affect the surrounding community. No more dark skies. 12. The approval of this project will permanently bring light pollution, noise, and traffic. There will be permanent and on -going noise from the wave generators, breaking waves, the lodgers, guests, loudspeakers and entertainment venues on -site every day until late in the evening. 13. Heavy Construction equipment will be working at 85 decibels or more, non-stop all day long, for the next 10-20 years- (according to Coral Mountain developers own projection). 14. The project will scrape away every inch of" biocrust", creating the need for even more Water Trucks to keep the dust down. "Biocrust "is to the Desert what "Tundra" is to the high elevations. Both tundra and biocrust take many hundreds of years to replace once damaged. Think of the impact on the Deserts already questionable water supply as just 2 years ago we were asked to dramatically cut back on water usage. Demands for water will only increase in future years. 15. This project will forever mar the stunning natural topography of the area, forever erasing the absolute silent evenings and dark skies enjoyed currently by all residents of the area. This Coral Mountain Resort project does not have any of the characteristics of the surrounding low- density up -scale residential neighborhoods. This is a Mega Resort, not a residential neighborhood. This type of development is completely not compatible with any of the surrounding neighborhoods for miles in every direction. City Planners and City Counsel Members, ask yourself, would you want to live next door to a Water Sports-Themed Amusement Park with 80 foot high stadium lighting, noise from concert venues, BMX motor bike racing, and wave machines and traffic 24/7? The approval of the proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Amusement Park style Resort will permanently cause the irreplaceable loss of the peaceful, quiet, serene atmosphere that this part of La Quinta is renowned for. Allowing this extremely large Tourist/Commercial Resort into our quiet low- density residential, golf -oriented neighborhoods, will negatively affect every Homeowner for miles around. There will be no coming back. The value of our homes and the quality of life of living and being in the "Quite Zone" of La Quinta will be forever degraded. I urge the City of La Quinta NOT to change the zoning from the current designation Low -Density Residential w/ 18-hole golf course to TOURIST/COMMERCIAL . I urge you not to allow Short Term Vacation Rentals (STVR) and the problems that accompany them. This proposed Coral Mountain Wave Park Resort is exactly the WRONG type of develop for this location. You are literally planning to drop a tourist amusement park resort in the middle of a quiet residential zone. Please do not allow this project to move forward. 649�age 2 of 3 Sincerely, Trilogy Resident JoAnne Thompson Bob Ruehl 60475 Staghorn Drive La Quinta, CA 92253 joswabt555@gmail.com Q Virus -free. www.avg.com 65(Page 3 of 3 Monday, March 8, 2021 at 07:47:24 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Park objection Date: Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 3:30:41 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Helen Thompson To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Helen Thompson To Whom it May Concern, I am writing to OBJECT to the Coral MountainWave Park project. I moved out to Trilogy LaQuinta to get away from tourist traffic and noise. I also don't understand why the adjoining communities were NOT given the complete impact of this development and would like to have a Townhall meeting to express our concerns. Regards, Helen Thompson (760) 777-9898 email: helenthompson7@gmail.com Helen 65'Page 1 of 1 Monday, March 8, 2021 at 07:47:51 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Park objection Date: Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 2:15:00 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Valerie Thompson To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Attention: City of La Quinta planning dept. I am absolutely furious and flabbergasted that this project has even made it this far without being voted on by the neighboring developments of Andalusia, Trilogy and the Quarry. Doesn't such a large project such as this require the approval of the neighboring communities? There are a lot of us homeowners in all three of these developments that are totally unaccepting of this kind of project amongst these high -end homes. The noise level and traffic will be astronomical. Any little bit of noise in this area Echoes off of Coral Mountain. Many of us moved out here for the peace and quiet and how far away it is from all of the noise and traffic from Highway 111. This is not an acceptable location by any means for such a project! Why can't they put it out off Highway 86 for easy access and in an area where there's lots of open land with no housing developments near by? Is it too late to get a petition going on this issue and how many signatures would be needed? Valerie Thompson 60553 Juniper Lane, La Quinta, California 92253 (661) 755-7600 (760) 777-9898 realtorvaleriethompson@gmail.com 65Tage 1 of 1 March 12, 2021 Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner City of La Qunita 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste: Comments on the Notice of Preparation for the Coral Mountain Resort The issues of primary concern to us as residents of Andalusia and neighbors of the new Coral Mountain Resort are highlighted below: A. Light Pollution. The Notice of Preparation indicates that the project proposes a 16.62 acre recreational Wave basin, including 80-foot light poles, to illuminate the Wave basin in the evenings. Currently, the evening sky facing the Coral Mountains is dark, allowing for undisrupted observation of the stars and planets. The lights necessary to luminate a 16.62 acre wave basin in the evening would definitely make an impact on the night sky, the wildlife in the area and the view from our homes. The Notice of Preparation also indicates that the project will be required to comply with the lighting and landscape requirements in the City of La Quinta Municipal Code. However, the Code does not appear to allow for lighting at a height of 80, especially across from a residential area. Is a variance being issued to allow this lighting? B. Noise Pollution. It is unclear if the Wave Basin will generate noise that will carry to our neighborhood. It appears that there will be a PA system that will announce the wave approximately every 6 minutes. Will this announcement be audible to our community every 6 minutes every day? There is also concern over the actual wave noise. Every six minutes a wave will run the length of the wave basin. What is the noise generated and how far will that noise carry? C. Traffic. Although the Notice of Preparation indicates that this site, which was originally approved for a golf course and single resident homes, will not bring in more traffic than the original proposed use, it will bring in a different type of use. As a hotel destination, traffic patterns will change as it attracts users for the hotel, surfing, restaurants, shopping, spa, entertainment, etc. There will no longer be light traffic conditions driving from our homes to our grocery store, cleaners, and other neighborhood stops. As residents of La Quinta, we already experience the impact of traffic from events such as tennis and concerts. We certainly do not want that in our backyard. 653 Currently, we live in a quiet residential area. We purchased our home in this part of the Coachella Valley because of the natural beauty and peacefulness of the area. We encourage the City to look closely at these potential issues in the EIR. Thank you for the opportunity to review the Notice. Sincerely, Theresa Toohey 81469 Andalusia Drive La Quinta, CA 916-768-5638 654 Monday, March 22, 2021 at 06:41:52 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Wave park at 58th and Madison Date: Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 1:22:06 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: DONALD TURNER To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: RMichels@consiliumassociates.net Dear council, This idea of a wave pool in this location is ridicules. We at Andalusia spent Millions of dollars for our properties, and expected the neighborhood would be as represented. We did not feel a developer would attempt to change the entire caracter of the area. We support the City of La Quinta in many ways and would expect the city to support us. Please cure this abnormality so we all may continue to enjoy our life style in La Quinta. Donald Turner 58290 Aracena 248-931-0040 655Page 1 of 1 DAN & BRENDA VATLAND 79345 Toronja LaQuinta, C A 92235 March 25, 2021 952-210-2237 1 bdvatland@gmail.com Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste Consulting Planner City of LaQuinta 78495 Calle Tampico LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Ms Nicole Sauviat Criste: RECr---IVED MAR 3 0 2021 CITY OF LA QU'It I1;,. DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT We are writing to express our disappointment with the proposed WavePark development in La Quinta. The 4 story hotel is two stories too tall and should be limited in height to not interfere with residents views of the beautiful mountains. The decibel level of the wave making equipment is unacceptable. We love our quiet golf community, and are disturbed by the thought of announcements broadcast to announce waves arriving. The visual pollution of the night sky is also deeply concerning. We chose to live in this area for the golf and beautiful landscapes. We feel that this location on Madison is not appropriate for a commercial development. We hope that the concerns of residents are considered by the city of LaQuinta. Sincerely, P,5-ack,�- c&v- Dan & Brenda Vatland 656 Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 16:44:28 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Attention Ms. Nicole Sauviat Criste - RE: LQ wave park proposal Coral Mountain Resort Date: Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 4:22:35 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Duncan Warden To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Duncan Warden Dear Ms. Sauviat Criste, I have recently learned the above project is still in the process of being reviewed for approval by the city of La Quinta. Many of the homeowners and potential investors in the Andalusia community, directly across Madison Street from the property, strongly object to the development based on the following points, referenced in the notice of preparation. A primary concern is the increase in light and noise pollution if this development is approved. I have spoken with the staff here in Andalusia; the lighting for our tennis courts is 36' high. This causes a modest but perceptible glow in the evening. The proposed lighting around the wave pool is for many 80' high bright lights situated on ground approximately 20 feet higher than that in Andalusia. These will surround not only the wave pool itself but also all the other activity areas - skateboard parks, paddle lakes, concert areas, etc., with a potential for severe impact on nocturnal and diurnal wildlife native to the region, as well as property values and future real estate development and sales. To date, car noise from the Thermal Race Track seems limited to daytime hours, primarily weekends. The Wave Park proposal is not adequately clear but gives the impression of utilization all day every day, and both earlier in the morning and later into the night. The wave pool also includes a loudspeaker system which will count down before every wave. This will occur every six minutes all day every day from early in the morning until late into the evening. The proposed development abuts the path leading to the Boo Hoff Hiking Trail which bans mountain bikes as it is a protected area for Big Horn Sheep. The impact of this development and the light and noise generated would seem to be a far greater impact on the habitat of the Big Horn Sheep than the occasional mountain bike. This proposed development requests zoning to be changed from Low Density Residential to Tourist/Commercial to allow a hotel as well as housing available for short term (even single night) rental. This means greatly increased traffic, well over the current zoning designation and all other communities in the immediate area. This area of La Quinta is extremely popular with walkers and cyclists because the low traffic levels have made it one of the safest areas in which to walk or ride. The traffic generated by this development would reduce that safety significantly. Another point that has been insufficiently investigated is the potential damage from the repetitive shock of the wave machine.. This could cause damage to pools, foundations, roads, and even other unimagined areas. Further study should be completed on this prior to any approval for the project. We and many other owners and potential buyers in the community are concerned and very hopeful that the proposal will not be approved unless and until impact studies evaluating these specific issues are completed. Thank you for your attention. Best regards, Duncan Warden DUNCAN WARDEN - MSC, CSCS USA TRIATHLON CERTIFIED COACH RRCA CERTIFIED COACH WWW.TRI-FYT.COM DCWARDEN@COMCAST.NET 508-245-1447 65 r-Page 1 of 2 Monday, March 29, 2021 at 11:07:00 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Proposed Wave Park on Madison Street in La Quinta Date: Monday, March 29, 2021 at 10:58:23 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Cassandra Warren To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov I am writing regarding the proposed Wave Park on Madison Street in La Quinta. As a seasonal resident of Trilogy for the past eleven years, I would like to register my objection to this Wave Park Project. Currently, the parcel of land that this Wave Park would be built on is zoned Residential/Golf Course. I do not believe the zoning should be changed to allow the Wave Park to be built. Currently, that land is surrounded by upscale residential developments including The Quarry and Andulusia plus the 55 plus community of Trilogy. This Wave park would negatively impact the quality of life for the current residents in the area. The excessive amount of traffic it would bring to this quiet residential area is unacceptable. In addition, the proposed light poles will bring extreme light pollution to this area. The wave machine and sound system would bring noise pollution to our peaceful residential area. This parcel of land should remain zoned for residential. Changing the zoning to allow this Wave Park would not be in the interest of the residents of this area who are the tax payers. The City Council should represent the best interests of the current residents of this area and not allow this Wave Park project to be built. Sincerely, Cassandra Warren 65EPage 1 of 1 Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 08:54:06 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Fw: Opposition to Surf Park Resort Date: Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 6:23:18 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Sheila Warren To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov My name is Sheila Warren and I'm a homeowner at Trilogy La Quinta. I have lived here for a year and a half and and one of the reasons I chose Trilogy was because of the upscale, sophisticated and quiet atmosphere of La Quinta. I was aware of the vacant land close to us but it was zoned low -density residential so I was not concerned about the future development. Changing the zoning to tourist -commercial and allowing the development of this resort will adversely impact all of the homeowners surrounding this development. The construction of the project will go on for years with the associated noise, dust and added traffic. Heavy trucks needed to haul material in and out will damage our pristine roads. Once the construction is completed on the wave it will be in operation from 7am to 7pm every single day. The stadium lights, noise from the wave and the announcers will disrupt the peacefulness of this beautiful area for all within miles of this project for twelve hours a day every day! Added to this problem will be issues with the rental of the houses. The majority of the surrounding communities with homeowners associations restrict rentals to no less than 30 days. There will be no such restriction on these houses so instead of being primary or second homes as the majority of the houses are in the immediate vicinity the majority of these houses will most likely end up being short term rentals as how many wealthy people will want to live full or part time in a surfer's and extreme sports fan's Disneyland. These will be large houses with most with 4 or 5 bedrooms. With La Quinta allowing up to eight to ten occupants in a 4 bedroom house and ten to twelve in a 5 bedroom house on short term rentals we are looking at 4,800 to 6,000 or more people here daily in addition to the occupants of the 150 room hotel which would potentially add another 300 or more people. Besides the "normal" daily usage the developer is asking for 16 days of special events. Added to that will be additional days needed to set up and take down the structures required for these events which will result in at least another ten or more days of additional heavy traffic. Cities in all of the surrounding desert communities are looking to eliminate or restrict short term rentals due to the associated problems - noise, disruptive traffic, etc. When there are so many problems with the short term rentals in the Cove why would La Quinta want to give the OK to a project which will have the majority of the homes being short term rentals? I can just imagine what the streets leading up to and exiting this project will look like -heavy partying surfers and other extreme sports fans racing up and down Madison causing chaos and traffic accidents. Many of us moved away from Los Angeles and other big cities to La Quinta to get away from traffic jams and just this type of behavior. If this project goes through it will be at our front door. This project will also adversely effect the value of houses in the surrounding communities. Who would be interested in buying in an area with a surfer's Disneyland in their backyard and flood lights looming over everything night after night. Instead of seeing stars at night our new view will be stadium lights, instead of piece and quiet we will have loud music bouncing off the mountains, instead of having wild animals enjoying this area we will have wild surfers. I think the majority of us are not opposed to the original plans for 750 houses and a golf course as the majority of these houses would probably be owner occupied or second homes. It is the Wave and the party people it will attract that is the problem for us. Thank you in advance for your further consideration of this project which will so adversely effect so many people in the surrounding communities. I look forward to your reply. Sincerely, 65�Page 1 of 2 Sheila Warren 818-422-9560 Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad 66(Page 2 of 2 Friday, April 2, 2021 at 06:31:07 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Development Date: Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 7:14:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Sheila Warren To: Consulting Planner Dear Ms. Criste, I live in Trilogy full time and have several concerns about this proposed use of the Coral Mountain parcel some of which were not addressed in the March 31 meeting. Upon completion millions of gallons of water will be held in the wave basin, what would happen to all that water in the event of a major earthquake? Has or will a study be done to determine how far the water would spread in the event of the total destruction of the wave basin? This is imperative. We live just a few short miles from the San Andreas fault and the epicenter of the Landers earthquake was just 70 miles from here. If the wave basin ruptured who would be responsible for the removal of all that water and the financial costs to the affected homeowners? By that time the developer could be long gone or in bankruptcy - would the City of La Quinta be responsible then as it was their shortsightedness for allowing a massive wave pool close to an active earthquake fault? Along this same line has an extensive geological as well as a EIR study been done on this parcel of land? I am not a geologist but I was under the impression that this area at one time may have been under water and in addition to being near active earthquake faults is subject to liquefaction. I was in the mortgage industry for over 30 years, when clients purchased hillside houses or often just expensive properties not just one but often two geological reports were done. Due to the nature of this proposed development I would think at the very least two in depth geological studies should be done and who will be paying for them? If one is provided by the developer at the very least the City of La Quinta should be hiring their own impartial geologist to do a second in depth report. The developer states "By committing to a private community, we are able to maintain similar traffic levels as the currently approved project." This is a fallacy, as originally zoned there would be 750 houses and a golf course. At best maybe 50% of the houses would be primary residences with the remainder being second homes and at any one time maybe 50% of the second homes would be occupied which would add maybe 600 - 700 additional cars traveling up and down Madison daily. The proposed project would have 150 hotel rooms and 600 homes. The developer has made it very clear that short term rentals will be allowed going so far as to say there will be an onsite management company to handle the rentals. In the propose price range of these houses I would anticipate they will have 4 bedrooms or more. La Quinta short term rental guideline allows 8 to 10 people to occupy a 4 bedroom house. There are not that many surfers that will be able to afford these houses and entertainment people are notoriously private (I handled many of their mortgages over the last 19 years) so who would purchase these houses in a surfer's Disneyland? I would venture to say mainly investors. As a result in full occupancy we could be looking at 150 additional cars from the hotel and maybe 2,400 additional cars from the rentals as unrelated people maybe occupying the houses with separate cars. This is a far cry from any 600 - 700 daily car trips if the project stays at is currently zoned and that is before the four "events" per year with associated additional traffic. Who will be enforcing speed limits, alcohol use etc at what would now appear to be party central? The existing homeowners purchased in this part of La Quinta for the peaceful vibe of the area, we did not plan on being neighbors to a private amusement park. Meriwether states "Our business plan is predicted upon the sale of luxury single family residences. We will not be successful if our amenities and programming are detrimental to future on -site residents and, by extension, we cannot negatively impact neighboring communities." In response I see no positive for the neighboring communities, we will have additional traffic, noise and light pollution and the project is "private" so no one in the surrounding communities would even be able to use the wave pool unless the buy or rent a house or take a room in the hotel, how can they say that benefits us? It is my understanding that at least one homeowner in Andalusia has already lost a sale due to the buyer being made aware of this proposed project, how many more people will lose sales as a result and if the sale does go through the value of the property could very well be depressed as a result of this development 66'Page 1 of 2 for the benefit of a few not the many homeowners in this area. Finally the developer states "perimeter landscaping on our property along Madison and Ave 58 will be included in the initial phase of construction." Andalusia opened in 2006 and after much effort the homeowners in Trilogy got them to finally landscape their side of 60th this year. Besides empty promises how do we really know this will be done? Along the same line Andalusia is 15 years old and still has not been completed. How do we know that there really is a market for this type of development? A competing project is already in the works in Thermal and another is proposed in Palm Desert. How many buyers are really interested in this type of development and what happens if after the wave pool is built they don't have buyers for the surrounding homes, our we stuck with a white elephant in our beautiful part of La Quinta? How would that positively impact our house values? Thank you in advance for your careful consideration of my points and my many neighbors who also are not in favor of this development. I look to further information from the City. Sincerely, Sheila Warren 818-422-9560 81856 Rustic Canyon Drive Sent from Yahoo Mail for iPad 66Yage 2 of 2 Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 12:19:14 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Date: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 at 10:58:53 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Dorothy Webster To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov This is to express my alarm and dismay at the possibility of the approval of the Coral Mountain project. I am a full-time Trilogy resident. I chose Trilogy because it is a 55+, quiet, secluded, safe community. My expectation was that it would remain so. The 55+ aspect of this location becomes moot if the Coral Mountain development becomes our neighbor. The negative environmental impact on this location is so monumental that the developer's proposal should have been dismissed without question by the City Council. Dorothy Webster Trilogy La Quinta 66yage 1 of 1 Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 08:54:41 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Comments regarding Coral Mountain Development Date: Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 12:09:00 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Kathy Weiss CC: ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov To Nicole Sauviat Criste, An Environmental Impact Report is being prepared for the City Of La Quinta to review The Coral Mountain Development that is planned for just outside the Quarry Gates, Trilogy at La Quinta, Andalusia, and PGA WEST, at the base of Coral Mountain. I am sending this to you, Nicole Criste, La Quinta City Planner, to convey the impact and negative effects to the Coral Mountain area. What "Coral Mountain Resort" has planned will have a huge and mostly negative and tragic effect to The Quarry, Trilogy at La Quinta and Andalusia & PGA WEST. The major significant impact on our environment and peaceful existence will be the Zoning Change from Low -Density Residential w/ 18-hole golf course to TOURIST/COMMERCIAL. Coral Mountain will be a mega resort with lodging potential for over 5,400 overnight tourists, with a 17- Acre Wave Pool that needs 18 million gallons of water to work. Coral Mountain Resort will not be a residential neighborhood. It will be a high energy Resort focused on attracting the young, affluent -travel -adventurer and Surfer. An enormous Surf/Extreme Sport Themed Adventure Park will be in front of the Quarry Gates and next to Trilogy at La Quinta , Andalusia, and PGA WEST. Plans for the Tourists in a "Commercial Environment", aka "Resort" are: #1. 600- person occupancy hotel complete w/ restaurants, bars, and entertainment all available on a per night basis. #2. 600 "Dwelling Units" with unlimited number of bedrooms & bathrooms- available for overnight rental. A dwelling unit could easily have 4 bedrooms, allowing 8 guests per unit. 600 Units x 8 people= 4,500 people staying in the Units. All units are available on an overnight basis- same as the Hotel. The staggering number of overnight rentals (STR's), 750, are the most impactful part of the project and the least discussed. The people coming to Coral Mountain are Vacationers, not Residents. Today's Short- Term vacationer is a different type than the kind I grew up knowing. Many vacationers of today are young, affluent, traveling with friends, want to have a good time and feel entitled to Party, Party, Party, no matter who or what is affected. La Quinta City Government is very aware of this new type of Short -Term Renter due to the 10th STR Moratorium issued in the past year. I am perplexed as to why LQ City Council would even consider allowing a zone change from Low -Residential to Tourist/Commercial amid Low -Residential, golf oriented, Zoned communities for miles in each direction. Coral Mountain will have the potential to lodge 5,400 people on an overnight basis. (as explained below) Imagine the mayhem and chaos created by 5,400 people staying right next door coming and going on a single night rental basis. Add the workforce needed to keep all running. That is what we will have after having endured the 10-20 year build out of constant heavy construction traffic, dust all day long, and pollution. Heavy traffic will dominate the Streets, where there were only light traffic conditions before. 664Page 1 of 5 Coral Mountain will not be a Residential Neighborhood just because it has "dwelling units. "This will be a 5,400-person capacity Tourist/Commercial Resort with The Wave Park and other water sports as the main feature. To attract more than just Surfers, Coral Mountain plans to have kid -friendly Roller Skate parks, BMX tracks, and ponds for hydrofoil and paddle board activities. Coral Mountain plans to have their own Vacation Rental website for booking reservations. The nightly rental business will be a huge part of their operation and income. Meriwether is quoted as saying "Coral Mountain is PRIVATE. The Wave Pool, etc. is open ONLY to members and guests. (Not "THEIR GUESTS"). There is an enormous difference. This is a word play wanting to portray a more "exclusive" type Resort. The Coral Mountain Guest is not like a typical Private Golf Club Guest. A Private golf club guest is accompanied by the Golf Course Member when using the facility. A Coral Mountain Guest is anyone that can pay the price of a room. With a daily 5,400 tourist/lodger capacity - there will be no need to be "open to the public." Word play again. #3. The Wave Pool covers 17 acres, a length of 2,600 feet, needing 18 million gallons of water to work. The Wave Pool water evaporation rate is 30,000 to work. The Wave Pool water evaporation rate is 30,000 to 180,000 gallons of water daily. Plans include stadium bleacher seating on each long side, and many 80' tall light towers for Night Surfing and entertainment. Plans have the Wave Pool running 365 days a year from 7 am to 7 pm for the 5,400 tourists staying at the hotel or in a dwelling unit. We will be living next door to a Las Vegas experience every single night. Goodbye Dark Skies- Hello Lights, Music, Action! We did not buy homes here to be blindsided by this Project. #4. Loudspeakers projecting above The Wave Pool in all directions are needed for the Wave Pool Announcer to call the 30 second countdown for every single wave. At $500 a Wave, 20 Waves per hour, the surfers need to be alerted for the coming Wave, as there is no Ocean to watch or feel until "the big one" comes. A Wave is manufactured every 3 minutes. The Lifeguards, videographers, photographers, will be riding motor driven Jet skis to handle their duties. Ajet ski is 100 to 150 decibels on the noise chart. No one can control the screams & shouts of the Surfers, skateboarders, BMX bikers, etc. and spectators. With a minimum of 2,500 ticket buying- people, plus the lodgers already staying there, for each of the 16 days of Televised events- complete with Special Event Hours- we will experience the constant hum and effects of huge numbers of human activity just around the corner. The noise level of the Wave crashing at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch has been measured at 75 decibels. 75 decibels is comparable to the sound of cars traveling on a busy interstate highway. Diesel trucks traveling at 40 mph are 84 decibels. Average Rock Band is 110 decibels. #5. As previously mentioned, Coral Mountain wants 16 days of "Special Events" spread out over 4, four- day weekends, complete with NBC filming the Events. That is 4 days MORE than Coachella Fest and Stagecoach combined. In no way, shape, or form does Coral Mountain fit in with the existing neighborhood. Tourist/Commercial Zoning allows a higher noise level. Low -Density Residential zoning does not. Coral Mountain Resort will be our loudest and most chaotic neighbor. Only 23 acres (3%) of the 386- acre site is set aside for Open Space. All workforce (3 eight- hour shifts daily) will commute as there is no employee housing on site. 66,Tage 2 of 5 Environmental Damage The Resort is open 24/7, 365 days a year. There is no downtime. If approved, La Quinta City Council will forever burden the existing surrounding neighborhoods with: # 1. Noise Pollution- that will NEVER CEASE- heavy Construction equipment working at 85 decibels or more, non-stop all day long, for the next 10-20 years- (according to Coral Mountain's own projection). The beep -beep of heavy construction equipment and trucks in reverse. Diesel engines always idling. Once completed, there will be noise from: constant traffic, horns honking, screeching tires, wave generators, breaking waves, the plethora of lodgers and guests, entertainment venues, crowds cheering & shouting, loudspeakers, and music broadcasting non-stop 12 hours or more daily. The lodger/guest can leave Coral Mountain Resort and go home when tired of the noise and activity. The homeowners and residents nearby cannot leave when tired of it. (Unless they sell and no longer live here). The people that invested and live in their homes here did so because of the quiet, peaceful, off the beaten path neighborhood that surrounds us. Most of the homeowners would have never bought in this area had we known La Quinta would allow this Zoning Change. # 2. Road and Traffic Congestion- no more light traffic conditions driving to the grocery store, restaurants, or shopping. Vehicles full of tourist/guests and the large workforce to keep Coral Mountain Resort running smoothly- will be driving to and from the intersection of 58th/60th and Madison on a daily, round the clock basis. No employee housing is planned at the Resort. Add the Shuttle Buses & Semis for bringing in people and supplies for the Public Events- driving will be a nightmare. Heavy traffic induces stress. More sitting in traffic, not moving one's body due to longer driving times, more air pollution when in traffic, all cause more stress and faster heart rate, which leads to tension, heart problems, and poor health. Heavy traffic has a negative effect on the desirability of a Residential Community. Driving to and from 58/60th & Madison will require vigilance, alertness, and quicker reaction time due to the increased number of vehicles, bicyclists, and pedestrians near 58th/60th and Madison. Cars speeding, driving under the influence, car accidents, honking horns, tires screeching, and Crime will increase. #3 Chaos and Mayhem NBC network owns the television rights to World Surf League (WSL). NBC will be announcing, recording, and televising the 16 days of Special Events and the World Surf League Competitions. Events will be open to the paying public (people that do not have a room/unit rented at Coral Mountain) and to Coral Mountain lodgers. These events, like most large events, will draw both good and bad types of people to our neighborhood. # 4. Air Pollution: diesel and gas fumes, constant dust during Meriwether's projected 10-20- year build -out. The project will scrape away every inch of biocrust", creating the need for even more Water Trucks to keep the dust down. Even if there were 100 hundred water trucks operating all day long- it is impossible to keep all the dust all the time. 17 acres will be dug deep to accommodate just the Wave Pool. Add the Hotel, Commercial buildings, 600 dwelling Units, more pools and water features-, utilities, roads, all require digging and moving dirt to build. 400 acres of dirt, rocks and vegetation will be loaded onto trucks and driven to another on- site spot where it will be dumped until needed. Then the dirt will be moved again. The winds still blow at night. Our neighborhoods and homes will be inundated with dirt, dust, pollens, allergens, and diesel fumes. "Biocrust "is to the Desert what "Tundra" is to the high elevations. Both tundra and biocrust take many hundreds of years to replace once damaged. Dust will be a big issue at Coral Mountain for eons to come. #5. Light Pollution- 80' tall light towers illuminating The Wave Pool, swimming pools, 669)age 3 of 5 Skateboard Park, BMX Track, other Sports Courts, acres of parking lots, streets, all lit for nighttime safety, and 117,000 square feet of Commercial Buildings lit inside and out. At night, Coral Mountain light spill will be equal, if not more, than the light emanating from several shopping centers. The spill light will affect the surrounding community. No more dark skies. Goodbye nocturnal wildlife. No more sitting out on the porch gazing at the stars. # 6. Road & street Damage; The infrastructure needed to ensure adequate water, sewer, electric, natural gas, and wi-fi is huge. Utilities will be buried under the newly paved 58th and 60th Streets and Madison or in trenches to be dug. Once an asphalt road is damaged, cracking and potholes develop. The newly paved 58th & 60th Streets by Madison will be trashed by 10 +years of heavy construction traffic. When heavy construction finally ends, the roads will need to be re -constructed for miles in every direction. # 7. What about the Elephant in the Room? Drought Conditions are dire in the Western States. What happens if the Colorado River is unable to fulfill the needs of the CVWD All American Canal after 5 to 10 years of drought conditions? Agriculture and new homes, to accommodate population growth, will take precedence of water allocation. Amusements and Sports will be at the bottom of the water allocation list. Who wants to live next to a stinky 17- acre Cement Pool that is full of run-off, mud, plants, insects, algae, dead animals, and trash? We know what the Salton Sea looks like today. That could happen here. Would not that be an eyesore for "The Gem of the Desert"? Adding to water woes is the fact that the Aquifer is refilling at a slow pace, due to local soil conditions. The aquifer water level has been dropping every year despite the water reclamation projects recently enacted. Coral Mountain Resort does not have any of the characteristics of the surrounding low - density residential neighborhoods. This is a high energy Mega Resort, open 24/7, 365 days a year, planning high profile televised events, totaling more days than Coachella Fest and Stagecoach combined! This Project is much better suited in an existing high Density, Tourist/Commercial area, with easy on and off access from the interstate , not needing to drive through miles of residential neighborhoods affecting every household and road on the routes. La Quinta has many acres of vacant land, with Commercial/Tourist zoning already in place, closer to the Interstate or Hwy 111. Coral Mountain development is not compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods near 58tr and Madison for miles in every direction. If LaQuinta City Council approves Coral Mountain, the surrounding neighborhood homeowners and Club members will suffer irreparable permanent and irreplaceable loss of the reasons why we bought here in the first place: for the peaceful, quiet, serene atmosphere this corner of La Quinta is renowned for. Allowing this extremely large Tourist/Commercial High- Density Resort into a quiet low- density residential, golf -oriented neighborhood, will negatively affect every Homeowner and Golf Member. There will be no coming back. The value and quality of life living and being in this special corner of the La Quinta will be tragically degraded forever. Sincerely, Kathy Weiss Quarry Winter Resident & Homeowner since 2005 58617 Quarry Ranch Rd. La Quinta, Ca. 92253 66 r-Page 4 of 5 970-309-7037 mobile 66EPage 5 of 5 KATHY WEISS' QUESTIONS IN RED IN RESPONSE TO GARRETT SIMON LETTER. Please add to EIR Scope comments & questions. Thank you. March 26, 2021 Dear Neighbors, On behalf of the development team at Coral Mountain, thank you for this opportunity to provide clarity on our proposed development of the Coral Mountain Resort on the vacant land west of Madison Street. We are grateful for the many supporters of our project who understand the upscale nature of our development and its benefits to the surrounding community. We have been made aware of misinformation being circulated to neighboring communities that is leading to confusion and questions. This letter will provide detailed information on our approval process, opportunity for public comment and a list of Frequently Asked Questions. Since our in -person community presentations in early 2020, our ability to process permits and entitlements was slowed due to the pandemic. However, our development plans have not changed since those presentations and we continue to work diligently with the City of La Quinta towards approval of the project. As many of you know, at the request of the City of La Quinta, we are completing and processing a full Environmental Impact Report (EIR). We welcome this increased analysis of our proposed project to ensure the outcome yields the best possible project for the community. The EIR requires that third party independent professionals who hires and pays for the independent professionals? Has Meriwether or Sunrise hired any of them in any capacity prior?) study all key elements and any possible impacts of the proposed project. The first step is the Notice of Preparation document recently advertised by the City to ensure all appropriate components of the project are fully evaluated. Through the Notice of Preparation, the City is accepting public and agency comments on the EIR scope and has extended the comment period until April 2. (The City Planner said DEADLINE needed to be extended due to Meriwether requesting a Developer's Agreement after the Scope Meeting Notice was sent out. Is that correct?) All comments can be sent to the City via email at ConsultingPlanner@laquintaca.gov. The City is hosting a virtual meeting on March 30 at 4:00 pm PST as an additional venue for comments on the EIR scope. You may receive the virtual meeting link by emailing the City at the email referenced above. There will be multiple opportunities for the public to review and comment on the information over the remainder of 2021. We are committed to keep all the surrounding communities fully informed and ensure (Will you keep the same people informed of future dates and deadlines, that you sent this email to?) that you understand the process and timing. As summarized below, the anticipated timeline from today to final action by City Council is 7 — 8 months. Why do the press releases and brochures portray that this project is already approved, and construction has started, when in fact, it is still in the approval stage? Majority of my neighbors think the approval process is over and City approval was given. I consider this purposeful deception by the Developer in all-out effort to squash the public from questioning project. I respectfully request that Meriwether amends it press releases to the public and not insinuate that Coral Mountain construction has started. • Draft EIR — Once the EIR scope is approved, the Draft EIR will be finalized and circulated for public review and comment for a period of 45 days. We anticipate this will occur in May or June. Will you alert the same list of people you sent this letter to ? • Final EIR —All comments will then be addressed and a Final EIR will be circulated to commenting agencies prior to consideration by the City. Please Define "commenting agency." • Public Hearings — Once the EIR is complete, comments addressed, and any plan revisions made, the City will schedule a public hearing before the Planning Commission. Following action by the Planning Commission (one or more meetings) the matter will move to a public hearing before the City Council with final action to be taken after one or more meetings. To summarize, public comments will be invited and received: • On the Notice of Preparation through April 2. • After completion and circulation of the Draft EIR. • At one or more Planning Commission hearings. • At one or more City Council hearings. The overall objective is to create an upscale private resort community that will complement the City of Meriwether contradicts itself. Press releases and brochures have said it is Public, others say it is private. What is your definition of a 'GUEST'? Is a GUEST sponsored & accompanied by a Member? Is a GUEST a person that rents a hotel room? Please Define "MEMBER". What type of Memberships will be offered? Meriwether definition of MEMBER & GUEST are of utmost importance. How many memberships will be available? Explain what Amenities come with each type of membership. Is a homeowner automatically a Member? What are the rules for membership? Cost of a membership? Are the Special Events PRIVATE or PUBLIC? Members Only? GUESTS? What is total number days of private events? 4 four -day weekends is 16 days of Public Events. Coachella Fest and Stagecoach are 12 days total. Meriwether is requesting the neighbors be burdened with the collateral nuisance and damage that comes with crowds coming all day and night to a Special Event. Explain how this "compliments" this low key neighborhood. What are the public hours of Special Event days? What are the operating hours of the workforce and equipment required to set up a Special Event? La Quinta, and, more specifically, the immediate area around our property. Our business plan is predicated upon the sale of luxury single family residences. If project is predicated on sale of luxury homes, why did Meriwether change the # of "HOMES" to "CASITA RENTALS'? by adding 104 Casita Rentals to the 150 Hotel Keys (hotel rooms= 254 total) That is more than 1/3 of total "DWELLING UNITS". As your project is driven by sale of luxury homes, not lots, who is the builder? Is this Builder in any way connected to Sunrise and or Andalusia Corporations? Will Meriwether allow other builders to build high end homes for lot buyers? We will not be successful if our amenities and Wave Park is now 33% Hotel rooms &Suites, 33% high priced lots, & 33% lower priced lots. This is a RESORT. programming are detrimental to future on -site residents and, by extension, we cannot negatively impact 670 neighboring communities. All people buying at The Wave Park are doing so to be close to the Wave Basin. The neighbors bought their homes knowing Andalusia West was zoned low- density residential community with golf course. I did my due diligence before purchasing my home- the parcel was not zoned for Tourist/Development. Explain how Meriwether will mitigate the concerns, after all is built and operating? With fewer COVID restrictions in place, we are happy to meet with neighbors in person to continue sharing details on our project and the process to ensure accurate information is being disseminated to the community. I am also personally available by email or phone at gsimon@meriwetherco.com or (970) 596- 6642. Sincerely, Garrett Simon Partner, Meriwether Companies FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS KATHY WEISS ASKS MORE QUESTIONS BELOW: How big is the project? Coral Mountain is situated on approximately 400 acres and is currently approved for 750 homes and a golf course. Our proposed project is a private community that includes 600 (104 Rental Casitas are not homes) and up to a 150-key Hotel. = 254 Overnight Rentals, built at once, 496 dwelling units -built by market demand. Wave Park is now 254 hotel rooms or Rental Casitas. hotel with a wave basin and other community amenities. Are the community amenities private? Are public amenities inside the Wave Park development? If amenities are inside Wave Park, explain how the Wave Park is PUBLIC? The public will have access to the hotel, how is that PRIVATE? Will the public be allowed to watch the Wave Basin Surfers when dining? Will there be Patio dining? How many bars and restaurants? How far are the restaurant(s) and bars from the Wave Basin? What type of entertainment will be offered to dining and bar guests? Music? What are restaurants and bars operating hours? How many people will restaurants seat? How many people will Bars seat? Will Hotel Guests & Homeowners have priority over other dining reservations? restaurant and bar on a reservation basis along with the commercial development at the Southwest Corner of Ave 58 and Madison. By committing to a private community, we are able to maintain similar traffic levels as the currently approved project. What about increased traffic for Special Events? How will that be controlled? By LQ City police and Riverside Sheriff? There will be an increase of speeding, accidents, driving DUI, and crime. All causing stress to local residents. How is that complimentary to the neighborhood? What are the hours of Special Events? When will landscaping be installed along Madison? Perimeter landscaping on our property along Madison and Ave 58 will be included in the initial phase of construction. Construction of The Wave Pool? Too vague. This area is the "front door" to our community, requiring early completion to ensure the 671 property looks great for the home sale process. What are the anticipated prices for lots and homes at Coral Mountain? Similar to other exclusive private residential communities do not have public hotel rooms, nor un-escorted guests. in La Quinta, our homesites are large with most ranging in size from 12,000 to 40,000 sf. Prices for large estate lots will begin at more than $2 million and finished homes in the village core will range from $2-$5 million. What type of Dwelling Units planned for outside the Core? How tall is the hotel? The hotel is still planned to have a portion of the rooms and facilities in a 2-story configuration, with a majority of the rooms in 1 story casitas. A 3-story slender structure with a footprint of approximately 1,000 sf is currently planned on the edge of the wave basin for viewing and operations. How many feet, not stories, high is the hotel and Viewing tower/aka Slender Structure? What are dimensions of "slender structure"? What are operating hours of "Slender Structure? " Where is the Wave Announcer speaking from? Will Wave Announcer voice be amplified? How many speakers are needed for Wave Announcer to be heard over 17 acres? Will TV crews be filming from the 'Slender structure"? Will lights and amplified noise come from the 'slender structure"? Will short term rentals be allowed? Short term rentals (at the option of the homeowner) are proposed for the community; however, we plan to manage 100% of the rentals through an onsite 24/7 management program. While we are confident we can address the issues related to short term rentals through onsite management and security, we understand this is a hot topic in La Quinta and look forward to working with the City to ensure compliance with all regulations. Extremely vague. Will you go by LQ STR rules and regs, even though you are not obligated to? Why are lights for the wave basin required? Due to the short daylight hours during the winter, directional lights are planned to allow for operations to 18- hole Golf courses, as zoned, do not need lights nor announcers to be useable. continue into the early evening hours. What are time is "evening hours"? The proposed lighting has been designed to meet the City of La Quinta requirements (vague, I need specifics. Will lighting be under Residential Guidelines or Tourist/Commercial Guidelines?) and ensure there is no light spillage outside of the basin property. What is the Basin Property? The entire parcel of land? Please provide light spill charts. The proposed lighting plan consists of single -mounted poles with directed LED lights with full cutoff and will not appear anything like stadium lights for tennis or athletic courts. The lights and sounds produced by the activities 672 are meant to be confined to the areas they are being produced, and not disturb the residences within this project let alone those that are bordering our project. Are "Public" areas of the Hotel and Rental Casitas lit at dark ? Are parking areas lit? How large are the parking lots? How many parking lots? What is surface of parking lots? Asphalt? Gravel? Sand? Grass? Will I hear the wave basin? The noise generated from the wave basin is the movement of water, similar to the ocean. The existing facility in Lemoore has been recorded by the sound engineer and this information has been incorporated Oceans can be deafening. Beach goers can leave the ocean and return home to a quiet home. Wave Park neighbors cannot unless they sell their home. into the noise study for the project. We expect the findings from the final report to confirm all City of La Quinta noise standards are met. This sound study is not professional nor scientific. It was not done on premises. It is comparing apples to oranges. Surf Ranch has soft ground. Coral Mt is hard ground. Surf Ranch is flat and green with agricultural crops. Coral Mountain has valleys, Mountains, and flat desert floor. Surf Ranch does not contain: a 150- room hotel, 154 Rental Casitas, restaurant, bars, and 456 dwelling units, each with people staying overnight. The guests, by invitation only, arriving at Surf Ranch, are on their best behavior. 3-4 Travel Campers are parked at Kelly Slater Surf Ranch. This is not a scientific study and is misleading to the Public. While not scientific like the above -mentioned study, last year we coordinated a site visit for a concerned neighbor which resulted in confirmation that the wave basin was barely audible at 300' distance with only an 8' wooden fence in between. His sound level meter recorded readings less than 50 decibels at this distance, significantly lower than the City of La Quinta's 65 decibel threshold for single family residential use. At 2,600' from the site, he was unable to hear any noise. It is important to note that the area surrounding the Lemoore facility is undeveloped flat land, very different than the plans at Coral Mountain Apples and oranges again. This is hearsay and not sufficient for an EIR report. This sound test was performed by amateurs, not professionals, nor w/ professional measuring devices. Sounds were not measured at intervals throughout the day, and only in 1 location. Your information is not valid. which will contain buildings and landscaping to further insulate the wave basin. The following notes the approximate shortest distance from the wave basin to the closest homes in each neighborhood: The Quarry — 2,400' (Coral Mountain sits in between the wave basin and all homes at The Quarry) Trilogy — 2,600' Andalusia — 4,100' Ave 60 Private Residence — 870' Will speakers be used to communicate with surfers in the basin? The existing wave basin operation in Lemoore, CA utilizes a speaker system to make periodic (every 150 seconds, for 30 second duration) safety. How many speakers are used in the speaker system? 673 What are hours for Wave operation? What are hours for Wave maintenance? How will this noise be mitigated? Kelly Slater, Mike Schwab, Kelly Slater Wave Design Company, and Ca. Assemblyman, Ian Calderon, sponsored legislation # AB 1161, to change the Calif. Health & Safety Code, June 13, 2019. Coral Mt parcel was purchased May 2019. KSWDC and Mike Schwab's Big Sky companies retracted the Wave Pool Permit application in West Palm Beach, Fla. On an 80- acre parcel Mike Schwab purchased. #AB1161 legislation requests that hygienic standards of water in the Wave Pool/Basin be lowered. (Even though brain -eating amoebas have been found and verified in Wave Pool water.) Is this what La Quinta City Council wants for The Jewel of the Crown, South La Quinta? announcements and has been included in the noise analysis for our EIR. While we are confident the noise study will show the speakers will not be audible off of our property, we will continue to look for alternatives to ensure this does not become a nuisance. These speakers are NOT used to project music across the wave basin. How will the music be projected? Amplified? What type of music? D.J., live bands, Opera, Symphony? How many different sources of music will be allowed to play at same time? Will the music being played be the same song at the same time? Or different steams of music? A "Battle of the Bands" atmosphere? Where will music emanate from? How many music/entertainment stages? Where and How many locations? Will short term guests be able to amplify music outside? Will personal watercraft (jet skis) operate in the wave basin? Currently in the existing facility, one jet ski is used to reposition surfers within the basin and for life safety Again, that does not answer the question. This Wave Pool is larger and operating 365 days/year. Surf Ranch is by invitation only. Apples to Oranges. In Surf Ranch videos, the jet -ski operates non-stop. I expect it will be similar, if not more. What other water vessels will be used? What are the hours of usage? Are jet skis used for pool maintenance? If more than 1 jet ski is needed, how will the extra noise be mitigated? Jet skis have been measured at 95-165 decibels. That noise level is higher the City Regs. purposes. We anticipate this will also be the case at Coral Mountain. Vague- not fact. Need to know exact sound levels of all: jet -skis, wave, train, announcer, music over 24- hour day combined., and when and where sound readings were taken. They will be noise from the spectators and surfers added. How will impacts from the four proposed annual public events impact the neighborhood? It is imperative to note the application as submitted does not give us the unilateral right to host an event. What "rights" does the application give the Developer? Nonetheless, Meriwether plans to have Special Events, totaling more days than Coachella Fest and Stagecoach combined. The EIR will study impacts should be applied for Special Events. we apply for and receive approval for events. We will be required to go through the City of La Quinta's special use permit process which requires significant detail to address items such as noise, traffic, etc. This would be a public process and include input from the community. 674 What is nature of Special Events? What are the components of Special Events? How many days per year? Special Event Hours, # of attendees? # of cars allowed to park on site? What type of extra activity is associated when holding a Special Event? I look forward to the EIR professionals' answers to my questions. Sincerely, Kathy Weiss kathy@crystalspringsranch.co 675 Monday, March 22, 2021 at 06:40:17 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Proposed Waterpark Date: Sunday, March 21, 2021 at 3:06:37 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Jim Welch To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Attachments: image001.jpg HI Nicole, We are Jim & Mary Welch 81450 Carboneras La Quinta CA 92253 303-886-7578. We purchased a home in Andalusia about 2 years ago because we preferred the quiet pace of this neighborhood to Palm Springs. We like stop signs rather than stop lights. We like being able to ride our bikes on the street without having to fear for our life due to heavy traffic. We enjoy the beautiful dark sky at night and we really enjoy the peace and quiet ! If you want to keep receiving the high property taxes we are paying, please do not allow our neighborhood to be ruined. We will not continue to pay these taxes if this is approved. WE WILL LEAVE! We agree with our neighbors concerns below and do not want our neighborhood to turn into a "shit show". Light pollution. This tract is in one of the last unspoiled areas of La Quinta where total darkness survives and our Andalusian observation of the beautiful desert night sky is uncompromised. This project proposes the installation of 80 ft high light poles all along the wave trench to allow for nighttime commercial activity which will likely completely obliterate the night sky. The area where the poles will sit is already about 20ft higher than Andalusia, which increases the likelihood that the emitted light will shine straight into our development. All desert cities have specific and strict rules on light pollution, so how come this can be tolerated by the city planners? And make no mistake, this will be 7 days per week all year long. Traffic and visual pollution. This tract was zoned to be a low density residential area (with full golf) and this new proposal will create substantial additional traffic to/from a full fledged commercial sports complex, hotel, multiple restaurants and higher density residential housing (up to 600 units — many likely short term rentals). The hotel, which was originally presented as two story maximum, is now planned as 4-story and will obstruct view of Coral Mountain from pretty much every residence with that view. Traffic on Madison will increase by many hundreds of vehicles. Noise pollution. The proposed wave equipment generates substantial and constant noise (minimum 75 decibels) that will travel far in the desert and is pretty much as if you are living next to a busy freeway. The developers admit that the wave operation will involve loudspeaker announcement of every wave. Noise pollution should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12. 4. Seismic disturbance. The proposed wave equipment by its very nature generates vibration (not to mention the additional seismic disturbance generated by the resulting wave crashing) which will easily travel long distances in the loose desert soil. Pool and Jacuzzi leaks for the neighboring properties will not be far behind. Seismic disturbance 67Wage 1 of 2 should be investigated more vigorously than stated in section 4.2.12. 5. Quality of life reduction. The hours of operation of this facility have been insufficiently clarified but there is a distinct impression the wave operation may be started as early as 6 in the morning and go well into the night? This should be considered unacceptable in a once peaceful residential area where the only disturbance might be an errand golf ball. It totally ignores the original zoning intent for this tract. The zoning change request should be more thoroughly investigated and the change to commercial should be opposed. Thanks, Jim Welch POWERCONTROtS 1205 W Center Ave. Denver, CO 80223 (303) 777-3100 office (303) 886-7578 cell 677Page 2 of 2 Friday, March 12, 2021 at 14:06:30 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Wave Park Date: Friday, March 12, 2021 at 1:50:19 PM Pacific Standard Time From: kelly welton To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Hello Nicole, My name is Kelly Welton, I am a resident of Trilogy. I moved here a year ago to enjoy the peace and quiet that South La Quinta has to offer. I am vehemently opposed to anything that will disturb the tranquility of this area. Why such a nuisance has to be built right in the middle of a residential area is puzzling at best. There are many other locations, with nothing else around but dirt, closer to Interstate 10, where no one will be bothered by the noise, to consider that can be zoned for this type of development. The mere thought of listening to constant truck traffic and construction every day for the next 5 years is distressing, at the very least. We, the residents of Trilogy, want to make sure the City of La Quinta maintains the highest standard of living possible. Allowing this kind of attraction in our community will only bring traffic, trash, noise, and trouble. Please spend time reconsidering this proposal. Sincerely, Kelly Welton Kelly Welton www.Acade myofNeonataiCare.org_ 877-884-4587 https://www.linkedin.com/in/kelwel "A Healthy Person has a thousand wishes; a sick person has but one". -Indian proverb 67EPage 1 of 1 Monday, March 8, 2021 at 07:48:28 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Wave Park Date: Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 9:55:43 AM Pacific Standard Time From: TEEUU1447 To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov I just wanted to state that I am against the park. Too much noise, too much traffic. I moved here from Los Angeles to get away from just that reason. Terry Werdann 60387 Lavender Court.... Trilogy 760 289 7602 TeeUU1447@aol.com 679�age 1 of 1 Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 12:30:17 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Wave Park Proposal Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 12:24:13 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Dave Wiezel To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Date: March 9, 2021 To: Nicole Criste From: Dave Wiezel and Bruce Tersiner Subject: Wave Park Proposal We are full time residents of Andalusia Country Club at 58540 Aracena for nearly eight years now. When we purchased, we were told of the plans to develop an adjoining custom home golf course community across Madison Street below Coral Mountain. This certainly made sense as the area surrounding Andalusia for many miles is comprised of golf course communities. We learned a year ago that the property for the proposed golf course community at Coral Mountain had been sold and the developers were planning a wave park community. The developers met with concerned Andalusia homeowners and shared their plans. Andalusia homeowners shared their concerns which include traffic, noise, and appearance. Generally we want the new development to blend in with the surrounding community as inconspicuously as possible, in a manner similar to all of the surrounding golf course communities. We recently learned that the wave park developer is proposing to include 80 foot lighting towers in their plans, and to operate the wave park at night. We believe this is totally inappropriate and inconsiderate to all surrounding developments and neighborhoods. There are not such stadium lights for a football, baseball, soccer or any other stadium within many miles of this planned development, and for good reason. We believe that operating the wave park at night will create a carnival -like atmosphere inconsistent with that of the quiet residential surrounding areas. We would respectfully request that these lights not be permitted, nor the operation of the wave park at night be allowed. We understand that other Andalusia owners have sent in letters expressing concerns regarding building heights, paint colors, landscape screening, etc. We share those concerns as well. Thank you for your consideration. Feel free to contact us if you have any further questions or concerns. Sincerely, Dave Wiezel Bruce Tersiner 68CPage 1 of 1 Sunday, March 7, 2021 at 08:50:02 Pacific Standard Time Subject: La Quinta Wave Proposed Wave Park Date: Saturday, March 6, 2021 at 7:27:26 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Carolyn Winnor To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Attention: Nicole Sauviat Criste I live in Trilogy at La Quinta, our backyard faces 60th Avenue and I am opposed as others in our community to the Proposed Wave Park. I attended the presentation given to our community by the developer. After doing further research and actually seeing how the waves are produced I became very concerned. The first Wave Park developed by Kelly Slater is located in Lemoore, Ca, currently sitting in an agricultural area, the Palm Desert development is surrounded by the Desert Willow Golf Course and the proposed Thermal development is near the private race track in the middle of an agricultural area. In the city of La Quinta, Mr. Slater is proposing placing a Wave Park in the middle of a residential area. I am against the rezoning of the property known as Andalusia West. I believe this project will have a negative impact on housing values: 1. Continuous noise of the wave machine, lighting after dusk, the park running 12 hours a day, 7 days a week. 2. Additional traffic, 4 special events per year, attracting an additional 2,500 people per event. Additional traffic for the Hotel and Restaurant daily. 3. Short term rentals, Coachella and Stage Coach attendees and constant traffic. 4. Our area in La Quinta should be considered the Quiet Zone. We enjoy the quiet evenings, the stars and tranquility. Please consider placing this development elsewhere in La Quinta, if you need the tax revenue; not next door to a 55 and older Residential Community located in the La Quinta Quiet Zone. We understand the property will need to be developed, please leave this parcel zoned as "Residential" not "Commercial Property". How many Wave Parks can the Coachella Valley Support? Thank You, Carolyn Winnor 81134 Barrel Cactus Road. La Quinta, CA 92253 760-238-4779 68-Page 1 of 2 Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 13:51:46 Pacific Standard Time Subject: La Quinta proposed and/or approved projects at Coral Mountain Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 1:43:30 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Derek Wong To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov Dear Nicole Sauviat Criste, I recently was made aware of the full scope and impact of the Wave park/hotel/homes/stores/restaurants/rentals in the eastern portion of La Quinta bordering Trilogy and Andalusia and am profoundly troubled on its decades long magnitude of disruption to our low-key communities. As a planner, I'm sure you're aware of the laundry list of issues so I won't rehash them here but the list is long, verifiable and formidable. I and presumably many others have no opposition to new developments as thats the natural course of things but they should be a continuation of what's here: upscale single family residences and not enormous projects that will overtax our streets, intersections, water consumption, endanger the local ecology and above all, disrupt our peaceful way of life. In reviewing the projects listed on the City of LQ website, I found no mention of the Wave park nor of the rental development between Ave. 60 and Ave. 62 off Monroe and find this quite odd. My understanding was that the project off Monroe had been approved for -90 residential family homes but new information says the plan is now to build 200+ STVR's. I do not see how this can be acceptable on any level: this would devalue our homes in Trilogy as there are dozens of homes backing up to this property. If my home was located here, I would sell and move without haste. We already have issues here; racing on 60th, Monroe and 62nd streets: daily donut practice on Madison and 60th and the dumping ground on Monroe and 60th. I really hope that other departments within the city are taking a hard look at these concerns but I have my doubts as these are years old already and the problems persist to this day. I'm not sure what impact this letter might have but I sincerely hope that you apply due consideration. Thank you, Derek Wong 81183 Caspian Ct. La Quinta, CA 92253 669-333-1818 682Page 1 of 1 Friday, April 2, 2021 at 14:50:38 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: Coral Mountain Wave Pool development Date: Friday, April 2, 2021 at 1:39:35 PM Pacific Daylight Time From: Derek Wong To: Consulting Planner CC: kathy@crystalspringsranch.co, capezio44@san.rr.com, karen.owenl@gmail.com, ilan.bendavid@gmail.com, anast.demitt@protonmail.com, lewatduke@gmail.com, nbruce@me.com, kathleenbogan@me.com, dalekarent@aol.com, drebryna@telusplanet.net, rkouellette@gmail.com, Igtampico@yahoo.com, cwinnor@dc.rr.com, kelwelrt@gmail.com, sheilawarren25@yahoo.com, lori.kilburn92@gmail.com, cccoger@yahoo.com, acallimanis@gmail.com, bobbie@fleury.tv, jeannenoel@gmail.com, vmn813@gmail.com, derekwong745@yahoo.com, pwayneplaza@yahoo.com Attachments: Screen Shot 2021-04-02 at 11.39.43 AM.png Nicole, By now, you have undoubtedly received innumerable communications form several communities and individuals opposing the building of this Wave Park. The evidence and anathema on this project increases daily: one of the worst drought years ever for California, 3 other wave parks already green -lit, potential equity loss for dozens of neighboring homes, nightmare traffic scenarios with no remedy planned, pollution from construction vehicles, elimination of dark skies, non-stop parties with no definitive oversight, long-range permit plan changes, the right to quiet enjoyment effectively eliminated, potential of increased crime & accidents and noise, noise, noise... everyday without end. Grow the community yes but adhere to the approved zoning of residential developments. Look at this picture: do these light towers really not intrude into the evening sky? How many home views will this affect? Ask yourself and the council members if they want this in their backyard. Thank you, 68yage 1 of 2 684Page 2 of 2 Monday, March 8, 2021 at 13:03:53 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Opposition to the Water Park: The Coral Mountain Development Date: Monday, March 8, 2021 at 11:53:08 AM Pacific Standard Time From: Duncan Woodfin To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov March 8, 2021 Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner: City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, Ca. 92253 Good Morning: I write in opposition to the zoning change on The Coral Mountain Development from low -density residential w/ 18-hole golf course to a tourist oriented, commercial resort. This mega resort with short term nightly rentals and amusement park type activities will disrupt the tranquil environment of our stable residential community. There will be constant guest turnover, short term overnight stays, noise, crime and traffic and the destruction of a stable neighborhood. This sort of development belongs in a commercially zoned area. Please do not destroy our residential zoned section of the Coachella Valley with events, amusement attractions, adventure park, extreme sporting activities and a Wave Machine measuring noise of 75 decibels at a similar Kelly Slater Surf Ranch. Noise levels akin to living along a freeway. And also, I thought California was in a drought crisis? Construction of a huge wave machine demanding precious water resources. How can we justify water use like this in a desert? How can government approve such a wanton waste of water when they continue to demand conservation from its residents? Is all this drought news fake? Finally, most galling to me, per numerous admissions by their Company Spokesman, the walking path along the base of the Coral Mountains will be walled off and gated to be used only by the privileged guest able to afford the resort charges. Signs posted by the US Federal Bureau of Land Management along this hiking path encourage the enjoyment of this beautiful walk for all citizens, not just the special few. How is it possible that a private, well financed land owner is able to control public land? The development company clearly does not care at all how this mega resort will impact the neighbors as well as the increased costs of police/sheriff personal. I am not unreasonable. Change happens and development is inevitable. But not the inappropriately huge scale with a negative neighborhood impact this commercial nightmare will have. It will bring massive, detrimental changes to the the environment and the residential lifestyle. The only benefit will be to the development company, not to citizens of La Quinta. Please deny the zoning change to allow this Disneyland oriented development. Thank you. Sincerely, Duncan Woodfin 685Page 1 of 2 60482 Desert Shadows Dr. La Quinta, CA 92253 400 422 3524 68Wage 2 of 2 Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 11:52:37 Pacific Daylight Time Subject: FW: Zoning for Meriwether Development at Coral Mountain Date: Thursday, April 1, 2021 at 11:18:12 AM Pacific Daylight Time From: Cheri Flores To: Nicole Criste CC: Planning WebMail, Danny Castro Attachments: image001.png Nicole, Another comment for the record. Cheri L. Flores I Planning Manager City of La Quinta /!Qa, Kra 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 (�(,/ Ph. 760-777-7067 www.laquintaca.gov PLEASE NOTE: City Hall is closed to the public due to the current Stay -At -Home orders regarding COVID-19. All services are available via phone, email or online web portal. Please contact City staff if you need assistance at (760) 777-7125. From: Wrobbel, Scott <swrobbel@deloitte.com> Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 11:12 AM To: Planning WebMail <Planning@laquintaca.gov> Cc: scott.wrobbel@outlook.com; Jean Wrobbel <jwrobbel@wi.rr.com> Subject: Zoning for Meriwether Development at Coral Mountain EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. La Quinta Planning Commission, I am writing in regards to the proposed zoning change for the Meriwether Development at Coral Mountain. I understand there was a virtual meeting on March 30, 2021 that I was unable to attend. As a La Quinta resident and homeowner in the Andalusia development, I am opposed to any change in the current zoning of that property. The proposed development, which includes a water basin (surf park) and a hotel, would cause irreparable damage to the beauty and landscape of that portion of La Quinta. Specifically, the light that will be emitted from the park and 687Page 1 of 2 related noise will damage the desert serenity and peacefulness that currently exits. I know that the La Quinta tag line is the "gem of the desert". This development will cause a step backwards from that aspiration. As an example, would the planning commission be supportive of such a surf park in the Sliver Rock development? Please accept my input. I look forward to further information and hope the Planning Commission evaluates the consequences of the proposed zoning change to the Meriwether development very thoroughly. Kind regards, Scott A. Wrobbel 59505 Seville La Quinta, CA 92253 414.573.2117 This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by law. If you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message and any disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of any action based on it, by you is strictly prohibited. Deloitte refers to a Deloitte member firm, one of its related entities, or Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited ("DTTL"). Each Deloitte member firm is a separate legal entity and a member of DTTL. DTTL does not provide services to clients. Please see www.deloitte.com/about to learn more. v. E.1 68EPage 2 of 2 Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 16:35:27 Pacific Standard Time Subject: Wave Park Impact on Andalusia Homeowners. Date: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 at 3:16:03 PM Pacific Standard Time From: Sarah Zappas To: consultingplanner@laquintaca.gov CC: Greg Zappas, Sarah Zappas > Hi Nicole Cristi, > My name is Sarah Zappas a homeowner in Andalusia for the last 8 years. I am writing this letter to communicate our displeasure with the Wave Park development going in across the street. One reason for our decision to move to Andalusia was the quiet nature of the surrounding area and the lack of major commercial building. > We learned of not only the wave park coming in across the street but the hotel that was originally going to be 2 stories. We have concerns about what the additional size of the hotel will do to our views as well the 80 foot lighting polls that will illuminate the sky at night which goes completely against the desert dark that has been enforced for as long as we have lived in La Quinta. > I feel having the wave park open at night is a very one sided decision, that is not taking into consideration, Andalusia's property owners and how this will effect our property values going forward. Many of the streets in the development have views that will look on to the hotel and the 80 foot lighting structures. I don't think that the developers have our best interest at heart, quite the contrary. Andalusia was here first and to build something that would be detrimental to our property, is corporate greed at its worst. > Please confirm what the status is of both the hotel height and the 80ft lighting structures. > Best Regards, > Sarah Zappas 68�Page 1 of 1 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 - March 2010 we, the Iresldenw of .a Quinta IAII surrounding cen-munittesl oppose the request of Resort d"Clopef AAertM+elher Campanees, aetfng under thr name CAA wave Development LLC, to modify the actual toning Plan 03 061, from ~Low L*nSlty Residential" to "Coral Maurltaln Taurlst f_ommefeial/Parks Fl kecreatlun-, in ordtr to accommodate tfie carntructirn of a large scale Surf Park and demand the City Council and the Ma)ror to ,eject the rrgU(-St for such a project for the IcAtowing reasons: I. Extensive and conitnw;us noise of the wav,* amchtne and music 12 hours a day, 7 days a week. 2. Dramatic negative Impact an thr pracefuL and serene Quality of life ar all neiioiboihoads 3 Increase of traffic, volurne Of can and bu%m. to both 60`*, Madison and Monrx StrCetS, eSpe-LIalLy during Petition surrirrrcxy weekends and the Fark't multiple large sutr events, and background A added pollution dui to land Activities, as will as tight pollution if the wave park rs ofx n after dusk. i. Environmental ImpaCt On local habitat inrlt►difte endarrgrrrd Species 6. Potential negatt�oe major impact on pouting values in all Communities ad;acrrlt to the new Surf Paris caused by noise and nuisance, 1. Extra water use by the Wave Park whsch would onty add to the diminution of the water EaLite and aquifers which has already apparently cainrd 1 2 feet of land suhsidence. Action petitioned We, the urid(xsigned. hove feud and understand Itic ubove. By Signing Ihis documr.nt. I fix 00%01Re my r)Unr- ctrhl C0tit1Jt_I Irllcrrnafion to bt used in ori"Itioll ut ttte Wave Vafk Projcc:l Printed Name Signature Address Date FREU t KRIMSTFIN 81507 CASTIEROCK CT 3/10/20 — V1 0UINIA CA 92253 81507 CASTIERt'Cf: C=1 lifJOA C KR.IM5TEIN LA QUINiA CA 92?53 3! 101`0 ••1 I ,luck Project 063-007 '�tiiiOrT 5Um•rlclry [7r1� 'foe, the Iresiderts' of la �urtta ;All surro,ind:••g C' Initicsl appose the request of Resort devel;.Fer Wnwcther Companies, ar,ing under t^c na;ne CGetie,oprient LLC, to Tm-lfy .-t ;. at zoning Plan 03 067, fr;m t_cew dertsity residential to Coral Mointain tourist �Ckcpot�r.a ccrT mer_ial, 'r order to eccomrroda:e the cc isur .CU :1 a large scale Surf Par- and demand :he C•ty Coun_n and the Mayor to reject the r-inuest ;ut :_c^ a piclecl lot the fcllevangrealY.s: I fxienai:•e and corti'tuu:r9 rose cf t-t wave me and rnu%ic , 2 Kmri, 7 drys a week. i % :hen►al': ncvCr.±'r.pact -- -re Ivv,-f, sciene quattly of ;ifi- of ad ncighbo'hrods Irtcreasc of trafiitc vol-.T.9 of _i,! =rw _r,s- b^th 6r.-•', Mad•,wxi asd.Mon,oe Streets. especially dunne ar4 the parks •Multiple large ;cal event-.. as light poiiutiun !f the wavo park is open after dusk. -' ,, c ' I . _ .� •- 1 e: darigered species ,-w', otrsing •. .ue: �^ al, adjacent t,, thc new Su•f mark caused by n. _e and nuisance i .•: NalAd. use Zy tt a %r:s i.. •-k ..c jp only add :o the diminution of the water table anc aquifers which has already 1.f7�1r' 'ii�l :.Z:.S':. 1•" ail ..: '.. ',� :i'�.)f'6'-.' O. �.t;:kit� , : r, �. - f — ,�z� . ►ELF cries •eril c-nd mth7rize my name !o be sed in dpposill-on of i'le The tit, L 'Iarl P-n.-, cr Pal -it d N0 _ _ sigi, tule Address Date i� • � lit � 1 '`J k ; � � � i `r1�1' � r (�+ 691 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 - March 2020 1'e.liticm sultirncny and t.)ockgrL-Aund We, the (retidrnt :) fit I a Qrrinra iAll :urrnttndtw ctxttnttrnitretl oppne the request of Resort develoW Menwettrer Cortvamcs, acting under the name CM Wave l)evetoprrtent LLC, to modify the actual meting Plan 03-067, ftorn "I nw Density fteudecttul" to "Coral Mountain I owst ComrnerclatlParks f3 Recreation", in rxcler to acrrxnmrtctate the constructfor► of a Urge scale 5ts1 Park and dentarxl tltr City Cc■tnril and thr Maym to reject the request for such a Ixojec I lur Iftr frdleworw rr.rlxn% 1. ttrtensWe and u striletuuui revise ut Hie wave n►atht#*- utcl ntnk 17 hours a day, 7 days a week 1. oramatke negative inr}►ac.t un Iltr Pe -'IL ful .end •rrrnr quality of life of all net¢htorhoods i. Irx rra+r of Itaffir vrdtanr of tar: next hers, to both 6Cr'. Madison and Monroe Streets, especially during weekends and the park'S multiple large u:alr rrrnlc. 4. Added txtilution dur tri land activities, as well as light pollution it the wave park is open atter dusk_ S (rwtrevxncMat impact on local habrtat including endangered spades. h Pntrnhal negative major impwt nn houslnR values in all c:rnviturriUes ad)dLefit to ltoe rtew Suit Palk c_eused by rknu- atxt rnji:rtcrc.r. 7 (xtra water use by the Wave Park wtnrh would only add to the d+rnutulwo at the water table Anil AWdri% who(h ts.A% airt-mly ajtjt:ttrntly ratnrcl t 7 fr-rt ref land subsidenc-e. Action petits weed We. Itie undwsigneari. have rend and trride."tand lhe. t,*,)ovg. By signing this clocurnenf. I for authorize my nrm�p anti (-nninc-t infrwrnntictn to Iseyseed in oppouliLwi Of It)L Wave 1-knk Plc4t:Ll Prk*ed Name Signature C At f ANj�ty �ilA�h► Address Dale jz � �'/ 8aw Sr,�•'� Gt LA CPA&; ,✓TAB 7Zstj 3- F/ • its 4FIS►V,, 6?•w-rrnr:n6 CR. ;, � � , �l 'I --•'. ar��%k it 692 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 - March 2020 Petition, summary and bocrkc1rcymci Action petitioned for 11'r. Iltr ltr.irlrnt .1 rtl le 011111la IAII SINIIIUIXl111111 rinlrluxiiitrS) 4)ixxr,r the irgtltnt of Revitt deveiuvef Meriwether r Crxnpan_s, actmq under tM- name CM Wave UevNopment LLC. to n,*Mfy the actual zoning Plan 03-1161, tr(xii "lnw Density ResidenUat" to "Coral Mountain tourist CommerUallParks tt RCtireaturrr". in <xde+ lu arcr>ti mKlatr the CtxeStrul.thbr iA a telge uetr iu I Part. end dc4itAnI I I w City C.IxwK it mul IIx• KiViii tri rrjet: l the rmir.sl for such a Nufrtr fnr Ilw rnllnvring rrautrr. 1 talensivr end c.rndirxulrn 110fte id Ilw- watir nw hrne .uod mo%ir 17 lvxr% it ddy, 7 ridyt s,% wrrk 7 Oraniotir mip:rrt tin 11x• liedr rftd aml .,?rem quality Of hfC � aIt �+_nghboncc-ft 1. Increase of traffic vrtturne of cari and buses, to both 60°, Madison and Monroe Streets, especialty duntlg werkr-nd) Anil thr lurk'•, m illildr large valr r•vCntS 4. added pollutwn due to land activities, as will as tlght pollution it the wave park is open after dusk. 5. En"ronmental impact on local habitat Including ends-igereo species. 6. Nxent►al necative maw impact on housim values In all communities adjacent to the new kit Park iauted ty rxww and rxw incr` 1, Extra water use by the wave Park which +would ofriy add to the dltrnitutkoi A) It* walC•r lable erKI eyeulri,. which has already apparently caused 1 2 feet of land subsidence r•;L. Iiit v+icfiyvyrt�tl, 1w-vi; IuaJ Ond VrV&,1Slc>IWj Ih�: c.ltlV ou. By sivwfvi this chn-t.lrlwtll, I (xilhnnti3 trey rxjrl►t? (lfxj Ce)F4IuLl inlcsinwliart tc) be uswi in opFxssitirn •:if the wrlve Park Prf jgb-f Printed Name Signature L Address L.-7 -12.;)ij DC** 693 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Prt?ject 03-067 March 2020 we, the iresidentsi of La Qumta iAli surrouMtng communitiesl oppose the request of Resort de-oeioper Mechvether Companies, acting under the name CM Ware Development I.I.C. to modify the actual zoning Plan 01-067, from "I ow N-risity, Residential" to "Coral AVAmtain Tourist Commercial/marks li Recreatan in order to accommodate the construction of a large scale Surf Park and demand the City Council and the Mayor to reject the request for such a project for the following reasons: i. Eftenstve and continuous noise of the wave machrie and music 12 hours a day, 7 days a weak. 2 Oramatic rbegatrve impact on the peaceful and serene quality of the of all neWpborhoods 3. rncrease of traffic voitume of cars and buses, to both 600% Madison and Monroe Streets. especially during Petition strtnmary weekends and the park'% multiple lamp scaLc rvents. and bockground 4. Added pollution due to land activities. as well. as light pollution if the wave park is open after dusk 'i. L"fonme"ital impact on local habitat wicluding endangered species. 6, potential negative major trripact on housing values in all communities arfiacert to the new Surf Park. uused by noise and nuisance. 7. EAtra water use by the Wave Park which would only add to the dimwuihan of the- water tahlc and "iifem which has already apparently caused 1 2 feet of land subsidence. Action petitioned We, the undersigned, have read and understand the at>ove. By signing this document, I for authorize my riomc and contact inforrrlation to be used in opposition of the Wave Park. Project hkft—A Nome R\.l R .F /GE.0 STz5i'NM N E,. BYO 4 Signature f y Address Dde d /Sgya�' owl 5- l2 -2& g, 2 4 DOVE' cAV4 3_ i Z- Zv L�ttl 694 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 - March 2020 Petition summary arui b ac kUrwnd Wr, the lresidinnts) of La Quinta IAII surrounding comrnuictiesl oppose the request or Resort developer Merrwe(lirr Companies, acting under the name CM Wave Development L.I.C. to modify the. actual >•onine Plan 03 067. from "Low Density Resldentutl- to "Ccoat Mfximain Tourist Comnx roallParks 8 Recreatitm", in order to accommodate the curnstrrx:h4jn of a large scale Surf Park and denmrid the City Council and the Mayor to reject the request for such a pro)mt for ttw- followlne reasons- t . Extern yr and co ntinuxn rvri,r of the wave marhine and music 12 hours a day, 7 days a week. 7. Dramatic nr-gative impact on Elie pcacefiil and serene quality of life of Mt neighborhoods 3. increase of traffic volume of cars and ouses, to both 6l7". Madisti n and Mu nrur Slrrrts, ripecia ly during vvec*ends and the park's muttipie large scale events. 14. Added pollution due to land actrnhes, as well as light pollution it the wavy phfk is uprn aftm dunk, S. Envifonmental impact on local habitat including erk'Angered %4*6rs. 6. Potential negatvve major impact on housing values to all ctxyirnuniliPti adjei rnl to the new Surf Park caused by noise and nuisance 7. Extra watef use by Elie wave Park which would ernly eyelet to lhr thimnwrlinn 4A the water table and aquifm which has atreadv apparently caused t - 2 feet of tend subsidence. I Action petitioned + We. the undersigned. have read and undefslond the cabtwo. By signing this docurnenl. I t(x 11 authorizer my nvmc and conloct informalion to be uswJ in apposition of the Wave Park Project Printed Name Signafufe Add►en Dd* Goo frey P. Doboet ;��< 81731 Charismatic Way (l3l12/2C)?() 1 a Qvinto, CA 92253 81731 Chafismo is Way Fc�ilh D. f�eR<)dii - - / 03/ i 2/2020 i [ _ La Quinta, CA 92253 CA1A �IW-4/7-, tz� _t_1G7�YJt'C_ef - -. L-1 JVr, 11 695 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 - March 2020 Petition sumrtay and botkgrotmd We. the trestdents) of LA QmtA (All surroundtrp cormvudttes) oppose the rtrgr .1 ,,t r. , Umpat»e•t, acting under the name CM Wave DrmWptrrt:rtt LLC, to modify the w,,e, . Orr>aty ResWerntW" to "Coral *Ww*Aarr Tsmow Carr wrcid/Parks @ RM tan' Con6trmtMn of a twV s[Ale 5uf Park and derttand the City CounrA and the ma r .s + project for the fdlowwq reawns: 1. Exttrfwve aad CoritlruM n01W of the wave mud** aml mule 11 hrxn-. is 1.. f I's 0 " . , 2 Dramatic nega" impact on the peaceltA and mane gyahty of trfo .it .,i, 1, . • 1, , P. wrease d traffic vokane of can aM bleach, to wt, be, Aadr.,w ,r,n r,- wft*ends and the pw*'s mtltlpte W" scale "MU, a Added pottutbn due to (am activities, as wed as Ilgfn pollut,rm It 5 Ermronr wmal impact on local hatAtAt indluchng tytdattttered tilw, w. 6. Potential r'►eVtrve mayor trrtpad Cn hMning vatfl!%io all curviw,ul•-. by noise and mAsance. 7. ExVa water use by the Wane Park wrtgdt would only add to Vie dmunut,.in w thr water table nrw oqu, m wh" Itaf already Apparently caused 1-2 kvt of tend :rdnnk-ire Action petitioned�We. ffte Undersvonved, how It'(Xf aartd txtdpsli r i 1for Uftlorb* my norne Clod ConloCt lrlbfrr+otion t• � 1 •r. Address Dote �lPd'S fe. srsP�.yrc &, ir:�rfi•_!/r,itf I�i+ ;, ills., L.j./^��c-�(,' ' `r7srv"/,� ""IM411'��'q� o. Qta r4sL CA 1?-;%Q �1to L-Mv (A`aArfA o41 IOU 3 l-T, -590"-kn, v,,-_ 6 /f� fry, C V) � Cy-zt ;S .- -ot ig tad i 696 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 Petition summary and we, tie I-esrdents; of La Qulnta IA.I %, r•o.,4ng r.ommurines1 oppose the request o' Resort deve.oper Merwethr Corrrparin. tatting L.rder background tie name CA wave Devetcpment LLC, . modify the ac:.,al roatrg Plan 03-C67, from Low oensity residertial to Cast Mourtain tourist cornmercla„ In order to acc-.mmcdnte t-11, c.wnstructior. of a ,arge scale Surf Para and derranc the City Courcli and the Mayor to eject the request for such a project for tie follow --I reasons: 1 Extensive and ccntinuow ioisr of the wave rracnrne ar-c' musk 12 hOL"t, 1 days a week i Dramatic neganwe Impart of the peaceful arc serene cual-ly of -ife of al, neignborhwas 3 Increase of traf'ic volune or cars and ouses, to b.th 63' . Naciscn Anc Hance Streets especlaIty durig weekends and vie ;ark's rnu.tiple .Argo scale r tints. ,. Awed :iol.utlon due lar,: act-vi les, as well as tight pollutior of the wave park is open after dusk.. S Env-ronmental impact or Local hab,tat in;l. dliq erdar-gred scecses. 6 Pmentiat negavve rna;o• impact m ioLi q values in all commurrtte, adjaceit :a the new 5L•r ;ark cau�'ec by ruse and ru,sagce Extra water use by the wave park which would only add to the diminution of the water table and aquifers vmtch has already apparently caus#d 1.2 feet of land subsidence. Acton petitioned for I have read anc understard ,he above statemen. aria at.trtonze my name to be used in opposition of the The'Wave Park Pro;ec- Printed Name iNr~ V. SAII to &..;1 67D W A" L. SNt c Lo i:.J Signature Address Date b c 5 2.3 To P a--_t:W LO- Q1111ti IT J fa,. Zaad, 6 / SZ > To 1""( 1 be. (44 / kj_4ti 697 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 - March 2o:, Nye, the (rrsidents) of la Qulnto (Ali surnxr4q coi+r+rsMttesl oppose the Imor-.r Cornpan4s. acvnv under the name C.At was Development LLC.10 modify the st t t, Density Retidental" to 'Coral Mountain Tourist C=uvwcial/Parks li Recreation comtructson of a laryr scale 5irf Park and dentard the CRY Council and the Mr r n t , . � , i , . . pro)rrt for the rolW" rw&WM t f xtrgswe and contvn,otrs noise of the wage machine and nle * 12 Mut . 2. Ih amatic "ttve Mn Wt on the peaceful and serene "Illy of ,it I 1. let r"se d trathc vaturrw of can and busts, to both be. Atadrurt .c., v PeOon Summory weekend& and the pork's maniple WV tale events and bnckgound a Added pvttutlon due to land actin Iir, in will as lWlt pdtuttr;n t• t►ti!' t. il.•• •!i•.� 5. ErnWentrwntal vrWt m local hab"t Ork dft end Mgwed .4m, A. Poteraat ilegat" rnaw Impact on homkq vlitkan in 0U (017w %ut rt •••..r.:.d: rt l ! I ! ir• r. ,h ',: rt t ,r. by mix and mAsame. 7, ban water mr by the Wave Park netldl would orgy AM to the dttmr4A;m of the wntt!* tanle sm., uptom which has already apparentiv caused 1.2 feet of lard subw*mr ACfiort petitioned We. the unnftrs,,yned. tar@ read and tNd@rS]n.; ' tt Mftiorize I: ,;�. . � ,, �• .,.I - fny rsamlh and contOCt IrOolmolior. fe r,r. 1 �. VI• rr_ � hinted Name Signature Address Date Jif 1­�_ 00/ f 37 PrItttan rtmmmn and We ft tle0du el Of La Otlnu loll tltllQ dial) WQn%um ft) OPlvate ctal •.a ng of Iltto.t d rmkw w rw.w.et— I ewnw-wa arttrq v dsar +. n.n. CM m W►*C Or-OLOpat LLC. to.r.OWe tha actual aawq Amt01 067_ t.Vtl Lon I - to .a.10•.t .taw to Lmau Ah...Ir In.rwt �Y7 ",mal. 1, rw w t. I..�i �wlJ acusn.rut✓.c tM ai.vutnwly t1 a WOR u/O Swf %A and Am.a.d nw Lttl fnn.tR and tt.. M.N, In .ram Ito, n vmu In nwi, . pml.rt to ttv i . t dar..v. wn l ml ln.nn aw nt !f� ...n r.rl •aw •nl mwtr t) rniR r *W)R ..rwk aalt ytt..IWAV-C un,.tt Mi ue plaaatfW I.W .trts.t unllly W Ih J •d rw.tlEcr..orM lrft.Na N h'.rr"1r MMIn/ N rlY[ ann n,w.t to r..r� NT ' Wa.tm aM NO.ItOt Streaaz. t$OttV IN dtf.11 .•Iplual.t. i.d Qva M.1a't n Mkou li'N IfaN ► I". htiad Orelllft!W dtrr M tan" * tlntfet..t will N "Pt retr~ • ow VMwt pars 14 Op" dte, IIc7i- . t n.t.t. mvnftl m*l.rt T 1e 1 nahl.t M/ufiq w.ef mNl To,$". ".Cw,- -010 ♦Ma.t v .m n erl —mew— wita,_t .n I,• nw.. BAe I,A Ia1nM thl 1..tte am •t"nc t ExUa vvMtr um t./ Um -a-t awi -hkh `-Pull OI* aW to a c di"i .2.T i% the -sow taDa .M swifen .' to hmm IU,~r app.ra,-tl. caused I I Sett or land umldence n pCOtl.-r.•: _ ' tug c rcad tnJ na krstz l the attave ttnteutcat so,; alMxw m% namx to be usel to .4p utwm cd the I lie M'aw fait Rrje.t i'IIWed Nathr Sgttatul lddrr.. i)atr � � i 4 Joao .�a�DkA 1-4I1✓yaM � � KAIWry6q�l�1AM �) YI D /W�u �� �r / A w/ AlrA, e A 'et;fior s:1m Mary an o Iaackgrou nd We. the Iresidcrtsi of La Quinta {Al'. surrou-KIinq cornniunitiesr oppose tic request of Resort developer Ner►wether Cornpanres, acting under the rune C.N Wave Cirwrinprnent LLC. to modily the actual zoning Ptar 03.067, `.roe Low density residential. to Coral Mountain tounst ci wierciai, in order Cc ac:orimcdate the constructior of a large scale Surf Park and demard the C,ty Coun it and ttre ,Na}rx t:> reject tv re-q-t,est for such a project to the tc(lowin reasals: Exlenstve and Continuo.n ncr:e of the wave rrw-hine ind nuslc t2 Ixxlrs, 7 days a week 2. Jranatsc r*Sative impact 7n the lwacef.A and serene quality of We of Al nr-igh,borhoods 3 r+:rease of traffic vDiurne of cars ane, bu;cs. to t) th M°i. mad-,ss:n and ,Wei-:e 5t+eats, espeoal;y dunrra weekend! aid the aar,'s rr.rttlple large scale events, a. t•ddc :! ;.ct:utior du::a laid act-Otic•. a; welt as tight ;:Alutlon if the wa'+e park Is open after d;Jsk. C-:ircmmcnal uipzct or. ;Deal hat tat riclud,ig endaiV d sph:les. 6 F,ter teal negative nal:e im;ac: en 'reusing values lr all cr;(nrnurnties adjacent to the ne-w 5url Park caused _Ny noise aid rt,-isin:e. 7 Extra Hater use by the wave park which wourd only add to tare diminution of the water table and aquifers wWth has alreedv apparently caused t -2 feet of land subsidence. •,n petitioned !or I have read and u"C-'er5%)r-j the cibove stoterrreni and outho,ize my rlame tc ^Q used in opcositk:n of the The Wave PO-k P.cec-t �rInted Name 4r,e^ L. Owev\ Signature Address SUN CAMS tom, 'GA i ---- ?S t y.) % rL 6 r� kin!• C� L /o Dade a 1 sl 2 700 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 Pe-ition sunwory and we, ine rreardrntsi of La Quinsu la {All rrounding curaaun+tiesi oppose the •e:aesW,, l of keIdeveloper WeriwCther Companies, actrnrL under the name CAA%Va,•e Development LLC, to nudify the act.:ai 2Cnrig Plan 03.067, from Low density residential to Corat Mountain tourst bUCk®tOlX1d comrnrr.ial, in order to accommodate the construction of a large scale Surf nark and demand the City Council and Vie Maya :a reject the requ*it for such a project for the t,Alowtng reasons - I Extenme and continuous noise of the wave mNovne a -id rhuwc 12 hours. 7 days a week. =. Dramatic r>igative impact en the peaceful a:.0 serene quamy of leer of Al. nsrghhorhaods ?. In:,:..... .d .. "_ .nfurro . f -� ...nd `u:rt, r- b-t!,�_'Y^, ,l:ad`son end.�'.r- StrretS, sl! pa:i�, duringw.7":'nd5 aid thearK's nwttlple large scale events. writ a: 1;-4t L: -t .i ff t c wave p.tra :: npm after dusk, ' - i •. r rn', .at h• k!A tml„ding erdargereo spe:les. Prltcnt -! gi;ttir nt;,r irn :,ti; nn tcusang value; In at: :nmrauniLes adjacent :_ tie rx?w SA 'ark caused tYv iolse ar i nuisance. 1: tra wate- use by the wave park which would only add to the diminution of the wate, table and aquifers which has already epparontly caused 1.2 favt of land subsidnncv, Action petilionea for have read any. , ndersia,)d •^e acove ssatement and authorize n-y name 'o be used i-, opposition of the ire Wave Pcnk Project Printed Name Sid f• 'of i -e ti S4iU (tuf �if�� ----24 � Address Date o,,01 T 9 /C Lt,Zz�3 701 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 - March 2020 Petition sumi,T% ry and background We, the (residents) err In [%note (All surrourang conununitkmj rrptx.rsc the request of Resort develuper Meriwrther Cot7lNa~%, Acting Under the name CM Wave Devilojrrnrnl I LC. to modify the actual toning Pthn 03-067. from "Low Detnily Rcsidcritial" to "Coral Mountain TourKi Cumtnr-rcial/Parks ii Ref-realiun", in order to accomrrlodate the torntrnKtion of a large scale Stol Park and drmind the City Council and 1hr Amynr to reject the request for such a Wojert for the following reasons. i Extensive and cwtinurrrs rxrse of the Nave machine and tmnir 17 hour a day. I days a week. 2. Draroatir negative impact on the peaceful aml %rrrnr quality of Itte tit all nrrghNItf yd5 1. Increase of traffK volu►i* of car% aM trtrscs, to both MY", Xmdiuin and Monroe Streets, especlally during wwrkcnds and the park's multiple large vAc rents. d Added pollution due to land acuvttirs, a,. wcli as trRht pollut►rrr of 11N' w,svr park is open after dusk. 5. Cmhronrrwntal impact on local IralWat including endangered stse it`s. 6. Potential negative nAjfn inyurr I on housing values to Mt cumirm"tiei adjacent to" new Scut Park cn►rrrf by rxyi%r• and nutsance 7 Extra water use the the Wave Park Nttwh wruld only add to the dirninutinn of the water tat4e and aquiters which hA% nhratiy arparently caused 1.1 feet of land subsidence. Action petitioned We, Wit: undersigned, hove rend rand unWrstand the nhove by signing Ihis WL-uinenl. I I for oulhorize my nohow and contpct intorryj060f% to h4b Med in opposificin of the Wave Park Profec-i Printed Name f� o,II4 G✓i4' sA.1 p��t u02Y Signature -r-2 may_ .--- Addfess Dote ,Vi 9 Y Jos.? xrt„ /,U'd e-t z, dot =L &' 7 702 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 -.March 2020 Petition surYunc ry and background Acton petitionexi for We. the (residents, of La Otsinta IAII surrounding comnunitiasi oppose the request Of Rmtttt drvr(4umr Meriwether Companies, acting undrr the name CM Wave Develolmnrot LLC, to modify thr- At tuat zoning Plan 03.067, from "Law Density Retidrnliai- to "Coral Mountain tuutr%t CcXrxnerciallharks h Rr(.rratiun", in order to accorttmodate t►w consttutliras of a large scale Surf Park and denvind the Lrty Luumil And the Mayor to re)ect the request fc,r %urh a projeLt fin the folln%inR reascats. f, rxtensive and condrnxxrs nnisr of the wave machitw and music 12 hours a day, 7 day% a week 2. Dramatic nrgative impact on the peac-elul and serene Quality of life of all netghbornoods 1 increase of vattic vultnr►r of cars and buses, tO boll, 60", Madison and Murtrue Starts, esmoatly during weekends and the pal*'s nudtiplr Inrye scale events. 1. Acbdrd pollution due to Lana activirtrs, as wetl as light p,lluti„n if the wave park is open Afirr rtUSk 5. rrivironmentat Impel I. rxr lax At habitat snclu0mg eiidairgerrd species. 6. Potential negative itmpt trnpitct can housing value% in .dl communities adjm rat to the new Surf hark caused by r"ii ;r and nuisance 7. rxtte water Use by the Wave Perk whirh would only 6W it) tlsr dtrriinution of the wntr-t tAhlr end aquiters which hA% Already apparently caused t -2 tint t,f land substdence. We. II)e urtctt.'rsigrt-ci, have read arx7 uwlerstcind the above, By signing this rlocutY Ant. I authcfize my nornP and cowltucl intufmation to hr:. u5od in euppositinn of the Wave t'(-xk Pm)juc:t Printed Nome i ►Tie' �CrT gow110 - �ap n e.na %n 6,,rz,%! jW,(N?4 Mood t, I Dom Iti't�2,�� f) lAo t Nl 1 c-n'- 64 / r 0-- K.t r 5 �'�A Address DOW .�} I r1 �*YI-4 6�-23-- Sff;-Ppyfri 3 x.-h-V S bm8 L maser t S,4 s �l s ToPA2 bR 3 �sv- Jz ZO-z 1 i V�� 703 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 - March 2020 We, tine (residents► of LA Quinta (All surroundiriil comrnrrutim) oppose the request of Resort developer Mtrrwether Companies, acting undrr the name CM Wave 0eoe4oprmnt LLC, to modify the actual zonWq Plan 03-067, from "Low Density Residential" to "Coral Morrrtain Tourist Commercial/Parks h Recreation". In tvdm In accorrxnodate the constructkin of a (arse scale Surf Park and demind the City Council and the Mayes to reject the request for surf► a project fur the following reasons. 1- Extensive and contrntx,us nume of thr• wave machine and MUSIC I houi% a rimy, 7 days a week- 7, Dramatic negative irritvict ern the peaceful aril vrrne quality of life of all neighbortxuxh 3 increasr of traffic volume of cars and tXf%fn, to both 60", Madison and Morirrre Streets, especially during Petition sUn-irnary weekends and the park's mu(tiple large uale events. and backgroun(i 4 Added pollution Mie Ire land aictivitles, as well - light po(tuttori It Ilse wave park is open after ch,.k 5. Crrvironrneiital hnIxer i m brat habitat Including midangered spec ins, 6. Potential re-gativr riujor impact on housinv values in all crxnrnunities adjaceiri ir, the new Surf Park Caused by noise and numnrwr 1 l_xtra water use by the Wave Park wfuch wrx,ld only add to the di►ninution of the water table and aquife(: which has already aMmirntly caused 1.2 feet of land nA)siderice. Action pe111i(YKf d We, the uridenigned. have rc,-jd cxui unrMr5teand Me c3bove. by slgrilrig this cic)rtjment, I for CJUItv)ri7P my name OW contuct infurmotion to be used in opposition of the Wave Parts Project Printed Name Gs- Slgnalure --� Address Dale "A Petition to Oppose the Wave. Park Project 03-067 - March 2020 Petition suairT►(ay and background We. the Ires>tdents) of 1 a Qlrenta (All surroundI.N comimmitirs) oppose the recµx•:t of Resort developer Menwethr, COmpan es, acting under the name CM Wave Devr1opment LLC, to nxidify the: actual zoning Plen O:t-067, from "Law t)ertsity Residential" to 'Coral Mtruntain Tmorist Convnerciai/Parks h Recreation", to Order to acrcmrrnodate the crx m,xtion of a large scale 'Airf Park wxi riernand the City Count -et and the Mayto to reject the request for such a project for the foitvwirrg reasurrs: 1 Fxtenstve and contimxw% rims- of the wave rttaomw and muW 12 hours a day, 7 days a week- 2- Uramatic negative• impact on the peacetul aril serene quality of life of all netghbcxbo ds A. lrstrrase of traffic v0lunw of can arxt Muses, to troth Mr, M:"son and Monroe Slrret5, especially during wrrkrrxh and the park's multiple lai ge u ale events. 4. Added pollution dtir to land actrot les. as well as leeht pollution of Itx- wave park is open after dusk. 5. Envlrarrnntal impact on local habitat InrtuQury endangered giei x-s, 6. RxrnlW rxtpative tnapr impart at trrtr,ying values to Alt < rntrnumtles adjacent to the new Surf Park caused by rirwse mW rxrisance. 7 Extra water use by the Wave Park which would only add to thr diminution Ot Use water table and aquifers which has alrehdy apparently caused 1-2 feet of land subsidence_ ACtion petitioned I Wu. the undersigoed. hUve readandIlrlde(StiXiod the oboveBy signingthis dtxxinneni. I nufhrgi7e my name and context infcxmartion to be used in ppoosition of the Wme Pnrk Pro -"-A It intaet 61eYna 14 fMT14VN %►ram s u.w► Nt: a l lv �24-1s & 4r i >r✓� � � - Pr1a s 0 �l Fr34 / I , 4w, -1 .11, a tk L tJ f (0.1 -T AA il. f/ .-A 705 Petition to Oppose the Wave Nark Project 0:3-067 - March 2020 we, it* lrrsidentsl of La Quinta IAII surlourxfirrg cvmmunitiesl oppose 1Ix* rr-zuc;t of Resort de.*toper Metiwethr, Crrmparnes, acting under the narnr CM Wave DC',viopmenl LLC, Ire mrxhfy the actual zoning Plan 01-067, from "Low (density kesidential" In "Coral Mountain Tounst Commercial/Park3 8 Recreattori-, In rxdrr ter aeeornmodate the constructh;n iaf a tame- scale Surf Park and den -and ihr City Council and the Mayor to reject the request for such a project fur the fallrwving masons_ i. Extensivr and continuous nurse o1 the wave machine and music i7 hixar-. a day, 7 days a week. 7. Namaw negative Impacl ort thr maceful and serene gtmtity of life of all neightxxlxxId% 3. Increase of traffic vdtirric of cars and buses, to hnth 60"', Madison arxt Mrxrroe Stmcts, especially during Polilwn stwmmary weekends and the pdrk's rnulliptr large scale events. and background 4. Added "tut►on due to land at tiviiie,, ,is well as light p>fhalum if the wave park Is open altr. clu%k. S. Environmental ktiµkt err lix nl Iribitat inctuding endArillt"ed species. 6 Potential'*galivr rimiov impact on houstrN valur% in Al communities oulpm rnt to the new Surf Park caused by noise and ouisaix.e. 7 Extra water usr by the wave Park which would only add to the dtminutirni of thr vrater table and aquifers which has already apparently caused 1 2 feet of land sulmirli-nce Action petitioned We- the wi-4ersigried. rx3ve 'Cud uri(? "I"Alf►r;trtrid fhC- Oi)Ove. By sigrirq this docivnt. I for uuthori7e my name cwJ conlnct intcxrnntinn to t)C utcd in apposition of the wove Palk fNLt ect Printed Name It=AJi/14 f vq c /- SU SA. rU 499, 4W%n' hwo Address J SN-}A Dv{ �(+tft.[ 6t-e-_ i'ij�� Uc-7D�w�u�✓'� r�� l 1�i-lt�tlr- LOSS t� it 'W.' rf: ,6 � JET 3127Zf 271Z2.1 -)L7. 706 Petition to Oppose the Wave Park Project 03-067 - March 2020 We, the (residents► of Le Qtdnta JAll wrrnuricbrig comniinitiesl oppose the request of Rev t developer Mr.riwelhrt Ccxrpanie%. acting under the name CM Wave Deveioptnerit LLC, In irirtrtify the actual zoning Plan 03 067, frorn "tow Density Residential" to "Coral .Mountain touilst Crxnnwttial/Pairks 8 Recreation", In order to accommodate the construction of a large scale Surf Park and drrmnrl the City Council and the Mayut tit tejet-t tar irWesl list such a project for the tiAlaosiv teasutn: I Extensive and c orttir utim rumme of the wavr machine and music 12 huuts a day, 7 day.. wart. 2 Dr.immir negative impact on the peaceful and serene quality rtf lifr of all nctghborhnx-ls 3 Increase of traffic volurne of cars and Lunn, to IxAh W'. Madison and Monroe Streets, especially during Petition 5ur1 merry omekends and the park's rnuitiple large scale events. anct txx_kgrchrnd 4 A+tldrd pottution due to tand activities. as well as light pdlulinn if the ware park is open after dusk. i Environmental impact cn local habitat nicltxtutg rrvl.tnt;rrrd wee-les. 6. Potential negative niaini ttnpac I in housing value; in all communities adjaLrry lot It** riew ,inf Park t mecd by noise and niinsance. 7. Extra water use by the wave Park which v mild only add to the dirninutrcri ui the water table. and agtnfrf% whi4 h has already apparently caused 1.2 feet of land sulnich-ix r•. Action petitioned I Wu. the under-ir}nfad, hnvfa rf -nd and understond the utu�vt: - By sigrsing this drxi vnent. I to( uuthori7ft my nomQ and contort infr>,rmatiurl to btu useref in opp(Mion of the., Wrives Park Prr�.f Printed Name Signature Address Date Y. - _,11\ ..., / 4 35 13 �,Q_�. a.._i -_� '��/t'� �' �y�-a--� .,J � E-�'`'�e�r (, /7�1 � o Q� r�f{t'tf0�✓e,.I � .,?7 a- / r - bt,1- C L (ir`r- v LA-t-:4-�i _T-m 14 f �t 3 (2. -7 � 21 i ' 707 Printed Name o 9AJ leo S F Signature .J4CI-- Address Date (;.4 CLT22.5 $ J f 5.2 CA S P ,�C r - A-*w tj C 4 1 L Z SYi5'? Po jwe i� t � S n Foie � l4v Or r �JS-4 D4"S twT wr L�c'w J2. 1,4 8r4 S3 .0 a cx�_ k c,A 7aaS3 - —LA D X f.J4-CyaiM`�4,Cl� �t Z25� k1 Y 2 Y,T� .•r,,,�[,�G7r L / doc- ¢ �2 S� ,car �: •u ;' t�c'r� S O-_ &/ � 1 u iv�,,s 5trt� �- (o l�.a�b �opGZ 3 v �J 708 Printed Nome of to �� tsP�.j, Sri � c�-t,,, � • J-Antitc 1E*LkvCL Address Dote UILU «IeLfIA n4 4 t b2.3 'ro &—L ✓� 3-2.5-ZI �- Z\ (00553 ��ati�f,�c. LAa4: LrA �Ut CQ- GIZLS.3 3- L5-Zt 6ass 3 .,► �i�%� � ::�+�� �i3"7cc ca�,Ght�i- C_ 709 :: 7 OV9 w4f waked tie D FS FIZT Spec,'a� E-XT9E-ME- CONDITIONS The Coachella Valley region ranges from below sea level to the highest peaks in Southern California - an 11,000 foot difference! Temperatures go from below freezing in the mountains, to blazing hot summer highs. fAl THE SHADOW OF THE MOUNTAINS 1W These conditions are the result of geography - mountains -MIN to the west create a "rain shadow" over the valley. ThE average annual rainfall is about 6 inches in Palm Springs, 0#0 t� and only about 3 inches in Coachella. A IZEStUE Today inequality, urban sprawl, and climate change threaten the unique and diverse communities found here. Working together, we can adapt to change and build a more resilient future. POZOTECT OV9 HOME Caring for our home is up to all of us, and involves decisions big and small. Understand and contribute to relationships between people, plants, animals, and climate. ACT NOW1! Start by going outside, on the trail or in your neighborhood. Practice Leave No Trace principles, ai use water wisely in the desert. You can make a difference in our community! � CactusToCloud Institute www.CactusToCioud.org Download, share, and adapt this graphic! Distributed under an CC BY7�'GJ% 4.0 license https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ 1.2 PURPOSE AND INTENT The Specific Plan presented herein is a comprehensive planning and development document intended to guide development of lands within the Specific Plan 03-067 area boundary.This doc- ument establishes development plans, guidelines, and regulations for the project plan area and specifies development criteria for various use permit entitlements scheduled to be developed within the plan area This document is intended to insure a high quality of development consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the City of La Quinta General Plan and the goals of the developers of the property. These goals include: • Implementation of a plan which recognizes, and wherever possible, protects the environmental characteristics of the property; • Creation of a community with a balance of appropriate land uses and a range of housing types; • Development of complementary recreational and commercial facilities which will serve a range of housing types; • Development of a community which provides a safe, secure and ecologically sound living environment. This Specific Plan guides the standard of development for Specific Plan 03-067 and is structured to provide a degree of flexibility to address market -driven demand changes. The Specific Plan 03- 067 Amendment H establishes and updates the design and development zoning policies applica- ble to development within the Specific Plan area described herein and establishes the regulations and standards which serve as the ordinance and development regulation for the property. This documents removes all land area south ofAvenue 60 from the existing Specific Plan land area, which is concurrently being processed under the "Trilogy at La Quinta, Shea Homes Community." Amendment V adjusts the location and layout of residential, golf and commercial uses on the west side of Madison Street and establishes fresh planning, architectural and landscape design guidelines for that area. The area East of Madison Street (Andalusia) remains as it is with no changes. Revised text is shown in red and revised exhibits are outlined in red, relating to the Western area (Coral Mountain Club) being revised. Any inconsistencies between the revised text and exhibits and the currently adopted Specific Plan document for the area outlined in red are to be interpreted in favor of the revised text and exhibits. 1.2 Specific Plan 03-O67 711 1.3 PROJECT REGIONAL SETTING The Original Specific Plan approval refered to as SP218 approved in Riverside County was locat- ed within the County of Riverside, in the Coachella Valley south and east of the City of La Quint& The Santa Rosa Mountains are located to the west, Salton Sea to the southeast and Little San Bernardino Mountains to the northeast. The project site included 1,280 acres bounded to the north by Avenue 58, south by Avenue 62, west of Jackson Street and east of Lake Cahuilla County Park The project site is located on the U.S. Geological Survey Indio, La Quinta, Martinez Mountain and Valerie Quadrangle Maps, including portions of Sections 26,27,28, 34 and 35 of Township 6 South and Range 7 East, San Bernardino Base and Meridian. Gos.yv6�+i1-�S Arf /gam • Exhibit t In 1999 the project was renamed to "Coral Mountain" after a significant landform which has been historically referred to as "Coral Reef Mountain." This significant geological feature forms part of = what is referred to as the "Remnant of Ancient Shoreline' on the Recreation & Thoroughfare Map of Desert Communities. The Coachella Valley is divided into the Upper and Lower Coachella Valley Land Use Planning Area profiles and the project site is located within the Lower Coachella Land Use Planning Area. The predominant land use in the area is agriculture, including dry farming and citriculture, while + a large portion of the Planning Area is vacant, non -irrigated desert Several sections of land in the 1 Planning Area are under Indian (Torres Martinez and Augustine Indian reservations) and Bureau of Land Management (BLM) ownership. The resulting checkerboard pattern is found throughout eastern Riverside County. Coral Mountain Specific Plan Amendment 1 included 1,280 acres of flat, slightly sloping land. Approximately 355 acres have been added to the plan area bringing the total acreage of the pre- vious plan to roughly 1635 The elevation ranges from approximately sea level in the western por- tion of the site to 90 feet below sea level in the eastern portion. Specific Plan 03-067 1.3 712 1.4 PROJECT LOCAL SETTING The Specific Plan boundary is within the City of La Quinta, a 31 square wile municipality locat- ed in the southwestern portion of the Coachella Valley. The City, which was incorporated in 1982, is bounded on the west by the City of Indian Wells, on the east, by the City of Indio and Riverside County, on the north by Riverside County, and Federal and County lands to the South - The amended Specific flan project site is generally defined by Avenue 58 along the Northerly boundary, Monroe Street to the East, Avenue 60 to the South, and to the West, vacant land and portions of the flood control dike. .I 1..I r ` i� INDIAN WELLS i INDIO I PALM DESERT y 001 EMENHUWER En f AVEME 60 • coacHELLA AVEX 52 i !A IHT �� AVENU 6/ � 3 N AIRPORT BLVD. Q AVENUE 68 PROJECT SITE AVENUE 67 Exhibit 2 Specific Plant 03-067 is accessible from Interstate 10 by way of Jefferson Street and Madison Street or Monroe Street The Specifiic Plan 03-067 project continues the implementation of a network of General Plan roads and infrastructure within the City's Master PIan for development and exemplifies a quality - of growth that reiterates the City's emergence as a desert resort community with the highest stan- dards for resort residential and recreational development Speoifia Plan 03-067 713 PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA City Council Meeting 4 November 2025 to CityClerkMail@LaQuintaCA.gov, Mary Mann 80451 Palatine Ct. La Quinta 775-527-8963 Maryhpmann@gmail.com Subject: Plea to `call up' Planning Commission Approval for further evaluation TTM2025- 0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 related to the Club At Coral Mt. At last weeks planning commission approvals were granted, despite lingering questions on timing, specifics of implementation of plan that impacts directly our Quality of Life and impacts our Community Resources. I presented many questions that are in the public record of the Public Hearing last week, and assume you have looked through this. I hope to drive some of these points home that the City is making a mistake in allowing this conception of the project to go forward there are specific unanswered questions surrounding the basis of the whole project approval down to the specific implementation plans as presented in the plans under consideration. Residents surrounding the property will be subject to large amounts of dust during construction. Given the potential for a many years long construction period and the large scale disturbance required for the proposed first phases, we are owed at least a look at the plan in place for dust suppression and description of how the natural dust fixing that is occurring now can be preserved for as long as possible. Dust is a documented significant health risk in our area. Below are some images from different perspectives of the project that I can point out what will be impacted. Have not had time to annotate all of these, but hope it spurs thought and discussion. Directly below in italics I've pasted a communication with the City planner, that goes through some of my other concerns about the Club at Coral Mt. Moving forward. I will also point to the Directors Hearing from yesterday 3 Oct. that I included comments regarding the Travertine project and how both of these developments will be defining La Quinta's future. Care and integrated planning is needed NOW before either of these projects move forward. 715 Email from 4 Oct. Planning with others copied: Thank you for the responses to my questions prior to the Planning commission last week and also appreciate you and the others meeting with me last week at City Hall. I still have significant questions on the implementation of this plan as presented in TTM2025-0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 for the club at Coral Mountain project. You indicated you might be able to provide me with contact information for your archaeologist, the contact at the agua caliente tribe, forest service, and Desert Recreation District for more information about some different aspects of this plan and the agreements with the city and developer. The rock art plan needs to be reviewed and approved before anyground work starts. The plan needs to incorporate potential impacts of proposed development across the tufa exposure as this is all connected. The developer and adjoining property owners (BLM, BOR, leaseholder DRD, CVWD) also need to be informed and approve of this plan for this larger community resource. City and CVWD suggestions maybe needed to provide for the protection of historical and biological resources in the same area. There was also an indication from our conversation that in the applicants plan there has been an incorporation of the activities of the La Quinta Historical Society related to the pending project into their implementation plan. Given the amount of resources contained on this property I'm hoping that this is the case and requesting documentation of the plan for at a minimum documenting the history of this place before these resources can be cut off and destroyed. I'm very concerned about the vague timelines given by the applicant and the possibility of work beginning that will directly impact sensitive resources that have yet to be documented defined or adequate matters put into place for their protection or the long-term enjoyment and education of the public. There is significant uncertainty with the agreement with 11D as to win this project could finallygo forward with adequate electricity agreements in place. Building a barrier wall cuts off all of our community views of Coral Mt and shoreline. The disturbing dust of grading a building the golf course puts current residences at jeopardy from an or quality perspective and will significantly impact our quality of life. I'm saddened by the thought of my son growing up in a construction zone. There was no discussion of the water resources and impacts to the water district infrastructure, this must be better understood by the City before this plan is about to be implemented. 716 The alignment of the barrier wall on the west side crosses over and blocks off critical water infrastructure and I have seen no documentation of the agreements with Coachella valley water district or any other public safety arms that indicate they are aware or have planned for how are public resources and infrastructure will be accessed and maintained. Other public comments at the meeting on 28 October and myself have a concern about the lake, this was not mentioned how much material will be moved and where it will be placed. Please keep in mind the fine dust that will be liberated by any action on this property that is fully naturally stable at the moment. Significant questions and skepticism from the planning commissioners were not adequately explained regarding the ingress egress plan all around the development at last week's public meeting. We have been given no timeline for when this project will start, and how it is planned to progress, when grading will begin, and etc. This risk is putting all of us in a situation of blowing dust for years to come, in an unfinished or unused project. Then significant reduction of the number of svtr in the proposed plan has the city looked into or requested information from applicant regarding the demand for this type of housing or anothergolf course and how that impacts our City finances? This is definitely not my area of expertise but it seems that the justification for approval of this project hinged a lot on the projected money from the future homeowners and their investments. Given that there will be a lot less of them how come there hasn't been a discussion of this significant impact to what the City thought it would gain from this project in the way of TOT 1 hope that we can be privy to the cost benefit analysis of City supporting development of this project at this time. There is a map in backup documentation (EIR) for this project showing the significant growth of trees Palo Verde, mesquite especially on edges of the property where boundary wall and fence are indicated. We have not seen a plan of which of these trees could or would be protected. These trees provide forage and food for many desert animals the property has been left idle enough are active ecological communities all over this property. And raptors and other birds on Coral Mountain depend on these for food shelter and forage. You need to see the details of the implementation of the biological protection measures. These included limits on time up here for disturbance. None of this was mentioned in the staff report for questions from Planning commission. 717 Enough for now. Please provide any documentation or contacts that would assist me in making the connections with others who have been involved in the analysis of this project. I encourage council to insist on a harder look at TTM2025-0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 and realize the significance of the implementation of this project for La Quinta's future. Figure 1: In email communication with City Planner I requested information regarding the project activities surrounding our public water infrastructure. The Planners communication indicate City is not aware of this active water conveyance structure (White structure) . We need to see the agreement with CVWD and ensure that they are in line with the City and Water districts expectation. Some of the unused water infrastructure that will be disturbed is now a historical resource and should be documented and catalogued at a minimum with the La Quinta Historical Society. This cannot happen in the vague timeframe presented by the applicant. 718 _ . •L�►!+`�1 ��. ��"Ls' a� . � ...'"icy` �1�i�fc `Ji► � 4 `''�- .�'s`2'�:,: _.z: �e, l ��! Figure 2: example of the current condition of a portion of the tufa. It shows marking from humans from 100s of years ago to today. An integrated plan is needed to manage these historic, prehistoric and natural history areas prior to imposing development on them. 719 Figure 3: view from tip of CM looking North showing proximity to Lake Cahuilla Park, and a complex network of landownership and rights that will be impacted by the implementation of the Club at Coral Mt. plan. Note there is a distinct slope break off the toe of CM. 720 Figure 4: A second view looking south showing the extent infiltration ponds, levee, and existing developments. City, public, emergency access are all key concerns in this complex network of land ownership, active development, and established open space recreation in the City. 721 Figure 5: Lookout on CM. Y. r . d Sri , 722 t -= jr Figure 6: Flag posing on CM looking east to Salton Sea Basin. CM is a beacon from around the Valley. Development on and around it must be integrated to conserve this amazing community resource and open space opportunity. 723 Y IL Figure 7 The `coral' of Coral Mountain. This provide us an educational opportunity, respect for our desert environment and understanding of the integrated nature of natural and human history. 724 Figure 8: Mary and Amos in the future Coral Mt. Regional park! This provide us an educational opportunity, respect for our desert environment and understanding of the integrated nature of natural and human history. 725 . � Y • � - � p�. I ti� f� fir, w � • R Figure 9: The `coral' of Coral Mountain. t 726 Figure 10: Cora! Mt. offers many adventures and views! 727 3b� ref t•t yk � � �, r � Figure 11: Local oddity- monkey face (shows up a as label on google earth). On or adjacent to property. 728 Figure 12: current condition sw boundary showing well used through road that access public land and infrastructure. These different uses must be accounted for. We are headed for a big mess. 729 •:: a Figure 13: Spray paint shows where fence is planned. This is way to close to the tufa to accommodate a trail and I am dismayed by the further degradation of this resource with the spray paint in advance of approval for the map and plans. 730 ~. � —'� � �. •�� ���-' / .y • L i�, y i,i � •` L *w.. tea' � _ i�., -1~ �' , <., y- .-,� .,�'.i fit_ .x- �� �rr'l•i ^ -� -' v -. yc t - .lt'''� .. Jor t lie 4 Figure 14: Quiet cove along east side of Coral Mountain. Figure 15: Current condition, shows the well -used road and CVWD infrastructure. 731 Figure 16: View to west from N. tip of CM to the west into the Wilderness area. Vultures, owls and Hawks live on coral mt. 732 �+- s if- • _ • er 46 Figure 17. the Quarry and Lake Cahuilla park from CM. 733 �..yv!W 46 AOZ Figure 18: turkey Vultures on coral Mt. Looking down on proposed development area. Many raptors live on Coral mountain -owls and hawks as well as these birds. The Property in question is an established hunting area adjacent to the mountain. These populations will be impacted negatively in the development of the project. 734 Figure 19: View from east towards the mouth of Devils Canyon showing Martinez landslide on left and Coral Mt on right. Gateway to the Santa Rosa Wilderenss. 735 t(vQ4 0 it(V - CALIFORNIA REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS VISTA SANTA ROSA MASTER PLAN DUE BY: JANUARY 5, 2025 BY 5 P.M. -Nq q&, hkh, 736 taQ�r� REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS The City of La Quinta (City) seeks proposals from qualified firms to conduct a phased public outreach program and prepare a Master Plan for the Vista Santa Rosa community. Project/Services Title: Issue Date: DUE DATE: Requesting Department Vista Santa Rosa Master Plan November 12, 2025 January 5, 2026 Design and Development Department GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS Proposals can be submitted via email, hand delivery, or mail. All proposals must bear original or electronic signatures. Submit five (5) paper original proposals in a sealed envelope or email an electronic original, as a single document in a PDF format, to the following contact: City of La Quinta Attn: Scott Nespor, Senior Planner 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Tel: (760) 777 — 7069 Email: SNespor(a_)_LaQuintaCA.gov Email Subject: RFP — Vista Santa Rosa Master Plan 2. SUBMISSION RESTRICTIONS All proposals must be submitted in writing; no oral, facsimile, or telephone proposals or modifications will be considered. Proposals received after the due date and time are considered non -responsive and will be returned unopened. 3. QUESTIONS or REQUESTS FOR CLARIFICATION Any requests for clarification or other questions concerning this RFP must be submitted in writing by December 12, 2025; and sent via email to Scott Nespor, Senior Planner, SNespor(cD-LaQuintaCA.gov 4. ERRORS AND OMISSIONS If a proposer discovers any ambiguity, conflict, discrepancy, omission, or other error in the RFP or any of its attachments, he/she shall immediately notify the City of such error in writing and request modification or clarification of the document. Modifications will be made by addenda. Clarifications will be provided in writing to all parties who have submitted proposals or who have requested an RFP for the purpose of preparing a proposal, without divulging the source of the request. If a proposer fails to notify the City prior to the date fixed for submission of proposals of an error in the RFP known to him/her, or an error that reasonably should have been known to him/her, Pagel of 11 737 taQa�fra he/she shall submit a proposal at his/her own risk, and if he/she is awarded an agreement, he/she shall not be entitled to additional compensation or time by reason of the error or any corrections thereof. 5. MODIFICATIONS AND WITHDRAWALS OF SUBMITTED PROPOSALS Proposer may withdraw proposals prior to the Submittal Deadline by submitting a written request to Scott Nespor, Senior Planner, at SNespor(a)_LaQuintaCA.gov. Withdrawn proposals will be returned unopened. Proposers may modify proposals prior to the Submittal Deadline by withdrawing their proposal as noted above and resubmitting anew before the Submittal Deadline. 6. ADDENDA The City may modify this RFP, any of its key action dates, or any of its attachments, prior to the submittal deadline. Addenda will be numbered consecutively and noted following the RFP title. It is the proposer's responsibility to ensure they have incorporated all addenda. Failure to acknowledge and incorporate addenda will not relieve the proposer from the responsibility to meet all terms and conditions of the RFP and any subsequent addenda. 7. REJECTION OF PROPOSALS The City may reject any or all proposals in whole or in part for any reason, including suspicion of collusion among proposers, and may waive any immaterial deviation in a proposal. The City's waiver of an immaterial defect shall in no way modify the RFP as published or excuse the proposer from full compliance with the specifications if he/she is awarded the agreement. Proposals referring to terms and conditions other than the City's terms and conditions as listed in the RFP may be rejected as being non -responsive. The City may conduct an investigation as deemed necessary to determine the ability of the proposer to perform the work, and the proposer shall furnish to the City all such information and data for this purpose as requested by the City. The City reserves the right to reject any proposal if the evidence submitted by, or investigation of, such proposer fails to satisfy the City that such proposer is properly qualified to carry out the obligations of the agreement and to complete the specified work. 8. CANCELLATION OF RFP This RFP does not obligate the City to enter into an agreement. The City reserves the right to cancel this RFP at any time, should the project be cancelled, the City loses the required funding, or it is deemed in the best interest of the City. No obligation, either expressed or implied, exists on the part of the City to make an award or to pay any cost incurred in the preparation or submission of a proposal. 9. DISPUTES/PROTESTS The City encourages proposers to resolve issues regarding the requirements or the procurement process through written correspondence and discussions during the period in which clarifying addenda may be issued. The City wishes to foster cooperative relationships and to reach a fair agreement in a timely manner. Formal proposals for major professional and technical services shall be governed by the City's Purchasing Policy. Page 2 of 11 738 taQu�fra 10. NEGOTIATIONS AND FINAL AGREEMENT The City's Agreement for Contract Services is enclosed as Attachment 1 for review prior to submitting a proposal. An agreement will not be binding or valid with the City unless and until it is executed by authorized representatives of the City and of the selected proposer. At the discretion of the City, any or all parts of the successful proposal shall be made a binding part of the agreement. 11. PRICING ADJUSTMENTS The City reserves the right to negotiate final pricing with the most qualified proposer. Pricing shall remain firm for the entire initial term of the agreement. Thereafter, any proposed pricing adjustment for additional periods, if any, shall be subject to the terms of the agreement. 12. SELECTION PROCESS Proposals shall be reviewed and rated based on the information requested by this RFP, as well as responses from references and clients, background checks, any research on proposers, and other information pertinent to the evaluation process. Closely ranked firms may be asked to furnish evidence of capability, equipment, and financial resources to adequately provide the services. 13. RFP TIMELINE RFP Issue Date: 11/12/2025 Deadline for Proposers' Questions: 12/12/2025 City's Response to Questions: 12/18/2025 Proposals Submittal Deadline: 01/05/2026 Complete Evaluations of Proposals: 02/09/2026 Agreement Negotiations and Signing, Proof of Insurance Coverage, Forms 700: 02/16/2026 City Council Consideration and Approval: 03/17/2026 Agreement Effective Date and Project Start Date 03/24/2026 Page 3 of 11 739 taQa�fra 14. PROPRIETARY, CONFIDENTIAL, AND PUBLIC INFORMATION 14.1 Proprietary and Trade Secret Information: A copy of each proposal will be retained as an official record and will become open to public inspection, unless the proposal or specific parts can be shown to be exempt by the California Public Records Act [California Government Code §7920.000 et seq.]. Each proposer may clearly label part of a proposal as "Confidential" if the proposer thereby agrees to indemnify and defend the City for honoring such a designation. The failure to label any information that is released by the City will constitute a complete waiver of all claims for damages caused by any release of the information. If a request for public records for labeled information is received by the City, the City will notify the proposer of the request and delay access to the material until seven working days after notification to the proposer. Within that delay, it will be the duty of the proposer to act in the protection of its labeled information. Failure to act will constitute a complete waiver. 14.2 Confidential Information: Evaluation scores, weight factors, and negotiation notes are confidential and will not be released or retained [California Government Code § 7922.500]. 14.3 Public Information: All proposals will be opened on January 5, 2026, and will be made available to the public upon request. By submitting a proposal, the proposer acknowledges and accepts that the content of the proposal and associated documents will become open to public inspection. The final executed agreement will be a public document. Proposals and other information will not be returned. 15. PROPOSAL PREPARATION COSTS Any costs incurred in the preparation of a proposal, preparation of changes or additions requested by the City, presentation to the City, travel in conjunction with such presentations, or samples of items shall be entirely the responsibility of the proposer. 16. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS and ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Proposals must include a completed "Insurance Requirements Acknowledgment" form included as Attachment 2 stating that, if selected, the proposer will provide the minimum insurance coverage and indemnification noted in Exhibits E and F, respectively, of the City's Agreement for Contract Services. Commercial General Liability (at least as broad as ISO CG 0001) $1,000,000 (per occurrence); $2,000,000 (general aggregate) Must include the following endorsements: General Liability Additional Insured General Liability Primary and Noncontributory Commercial Auto Liability (at least as broad as ISO CA 0001) $1,000,000 (per accident) Personal Auto Declaration Page if applicable Errors and Omissions Liability $1,000,000 (per claim and aggregate) Page 4 of 11 740 Worker's Compensation (per statutory requirements) Must include the following endorsements: Worker's Compensation Waiver of Subrogation Worker's Compensation Declaration of Sole Proprietor if applicable 17. NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT Proposals must include an executed Non -Collusion Affidavit, included as Attachment 3, executed by an official authorized to bind the firm. 18. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The City requires a Statement of Economic Interest (Form 700) to be filed by any proposer who is involved in the making of decisions that may have a foreseeable material effect on any City financial interest pursuant to the City's Conflict of Interest Code and the California Political Reform Act of 1974. 19. LOCAL BUSINESS PREFERENCE Local vendors are encouraged but not required. For purposes of this section, `local' shall be defined as an individual, partnership, or corporation that regularly maintains a place of business within a 40-mile radius of the City. 20. CITY RIGHTS AND OPTIONS This solicitation does not commit the City of La Quinta to award a contract, to pay any cost incurred with the preparation of a qualifications statement, or to procure or contract for services or supplies. The City of La Quinta reserves the right to accept or reject any or all submittals received in response to this request, to negotiate with any qualified source, or cancel in whole or part this RFP process if it is in the best interest of the City to do so. After negotiations, prospective consultants may be required to submit revisions to their qualification statements. The City of La Quinta will reserve the right to request that specific personnel with specific expertise be added to the team if the City determines that specific expertise is lacking in the project team. All proposers should note that any contract pursuant to this solicitation is dependent upon the recommendation of the selection committee and the approval of the City Council. Statements and other materials submitted will not be returned. The City of La Quinta reserves the right to change its procurement process for the contract at any time if it is determined that abandonment and/or change would be in the City's best interest. In the event of an abandonment or change, the City will not be liable to any contractor for any costs or damages arising out of its response to the RFP. The City reserves the right to: ■ Make the selection based on its sole discretion; ■ Issue subsequent RFP; ■ Postpone opening proposals or selection for any reason; ■ Remedy errors in the RFP or in the RFP process; ■ Modify the Scope of Services in the RFP; ■ Approve or disapprove the use of particular subcontractors; Page 5 of 11 741 taQa�fra ■ Negotiate with any, all or none of the proposers; ■ Accept other than the lowest offer; ■ Waive informalities and irregularities in proposals; ■ Request additional information or clarification; ■ Request revisions during negotiations; ■ Invite any consultant of its choosing to assist with the evaluation of proposal responses or to provide the City with a second opinion ■ Enter into an agreement with another proposer in the event the originally selected proposer defaults or fails to execute an agreement with the City in a timely manner. REQUESTED SERVICES The City of La Quinta (City) seeks proposals from qualified firms to conduct a phased public outreach program and prepare a Master Plan for Vista Santa Rosa, a community located within the City's southern Sphere of Influence (SOI). The purpose of this project is to guide future growth, infrastructure development, land use, housing, environmental stewardship, and community services in a sustainable and inclusive manner. The City is requesting the Master Plan pursuant to La Quinta General Plan 2035, Policy LU- 1.4: The City should not consider annexation of any part of the southern Sphere of Influence prior to completion of a Master Plan, to assure that development proceeds in a manner that satisfies good planning principles and stakeholders' needs. I. INTRODUCTION The City's SOI consists of 7,665± acres generally located east of Monroe, south of Avenue 52, north of Avenue 60, and west of Van Buren and Harrison Streets. Of the 7,664± acres in the SOI, approximately 1,407 acres are developed, 5,429 acres are in agriculture, and 828 acres are vacant desert lands. Much of the developed area consists of nurseries and single-family homes on large lots. To achieve cohesive and successful development of the area, long-term planning of the Sphere area must be undertaken. This Master Plan will be community -focused and incorporate sound planning principles, such as limiting urban sprawl, and lowering vehicle trips and greenhouse gas emissions, while preserving the unique rural character of this area. Any future annexation must not create a revenue drain on the City. Vista Santa Rosa Vista Santa Rosa is a special community where country club and residential development interface with agricultural and rural, equestrian -oriented lifestyles. Vista Santa Rosa is an unincorporated community of approximately 2,600 residents. The community is named for the Santa Rosa Mountains that can be seen from the community to the west. The area is an important producer of date crops, with some date farm owners also operating Ranchos, which host special events such as wedding receptions and quinceaneras. Rural residential uses are also common, with an emphasis on equestrian activities, including polo facilities. II. SCOPE OF SERVICES Page 6 of 11 742 taQa�fra Proposals shall address the following phased tasks to be completed by the consultant. However, consultants are encouraged to provide alternative ideas, programs, and suggestions, based on experience with community outreach and master plan preparation. The proposal shall be developed with the following phased approach and an understanding the City may opt to complete one, two, three, all of the phases, or none. Phase 1: Community Outreach Strategy The City desires a comprehensive stakeholder engagement program that actively involves property owners, businesses, residents, and City Officials through a combination of community meetings at central locations, focus groups, online platforms, and one-on-one conversations. This inclusive approach should be designed to collaboratively shape a shared vision for the Master Plan and build broad community support for the potential annexation into the City of La Quinta. A culturally responsive, bilingual (English -Spanish) outreach strategy that recognizes the area's population should be incorporated. All residents should be able to participate meaningfully as the City seeks to engage their community. The methodology of obtaining community/stakeholder input for the Master Plan and gauging support for future annexation applications shall be described in the proposal. Phase 2: Master Plan The preparation of the master plan shall include identifying baseline data for drafting the Master Plan including: existing locations and extent of public and private roads, sewage, water, drainage, solid waste disposal, energy, and other essential facilities. Census data and an existing land use analysis shall also be considered. A minimum of three alternative conceptual land use maps shall be prepared for consideration. The use of creative land use categories and design guidelines to enhance the unique character of Vista Santa Rosa is encouraged. A market analysis for the buildout feasibility of the Master Plan shall be prepared. The land use plans shall be presented at an additional community workshop meeting. A final draft master plan shall be prepared based upon community and City feedback. Phase 3: Special Studies Special Studies shall be prepared to analyze and quantify the impacts of buildout of the Vista Santa Rosa community based on the draft master plan. Studies shall include, but may not be limited to, Biological Resources Analysis, Cultural Resources Analysis, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis, Traffic and Vehicle Miles Traveled Analysis, Noise Impact Analysis, and a Water Supply Assessment. Phase 4: California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Environmental Analysis and Document Preparation The project consultant(s) will prepare an Initial Study which will analyze the broad -scale environmental impacts of the draft Master Plan. Ideally, the consultant's work will provide a programmatic level of CEQA analysis that will cover future projects that are consistent with the master plan. The consultant(s) will be responsible for the preparation of the environmental document or Environmental impact Report (EIR) as determined by the Initial Study. Additional Page 7 of 11 743 deliverables that are associated with this Task will be dependent on the findings from the Initial Study. Additional public meetings associated with the Environmental Document should be included in the proposal. Materials to be provided by the City The following materials are available for consultants to prepare their responses: 2035 La Quinta General Plan 2035 La Quinta General Plan I La Quinta, CA Municipal Code, Title 9 Zoning https://Iibrary.municode.com/ca/la quinta/codes/municipal code?nodeld=TIT9ZO Zoning and General Plan Maps https://www.laguintaca.gov/business/design-and-development/planning-division/maps Other materials may be provided upon request. Selection Criteria and Process Qualifications The successful firm shall be expected to demonstrate that it possesses the following qualifications: ➢ Capability to competently manage the described project, including demonstrated experience of having successfully completed similar projects; ➢ Ability to form a project team consisting of capable professionals with all disciplines needed for the job, having adequate resources to successfully complete the project in a timely manner, including a specific commitment as to the time each team member can allocate to the project; ➢ A superior level of commitment to the goals and objectives of the project; ➢ The ability to collaborate in a responsive and cooperative manner, highlighting examples of similar situations; ➢ Sensitivity to the needs of the public and property owners; ➢ High level of commitment to the goals and objectives of the project; ➢ Ability to work in a responsive and cooperative manner with the City and public and highlight examples of similar situations; Consultant Selection Proposals received by the deadline will be reviewed by a selection committee comprised of City staff. Interviews will be held with the top -rated firms. Based on the total evaluation process, the selection committee will recommend one firm (and an alternate). Selection of Page 8 of 11 744 the consultant will be based upon the materials submitted in the Work Proposal according to the following criteria: ➢ Method of approach, both analytical and creative; ➢ Experiences, qualifications, and resources of the firm, including experience with similar projects; ➢ Responsiveness to the RFP, including thoroughness, comprehensiveness, adequacy, clarity, and quality of information provided; ➢ Understanding of the Scope of Work; ➢ Cost of services; ➢ Allocation of experienced senior -level staff to the project; ➢ Ability to comply with the proposed performance schedule; ➢ Knowledge and familiarity with the community, local, and regional planning issues. III. PROPOSAL FORMAT Firms are encouraged to keep their proposals brief and relevant to the specific information requested herein. Proposals should be straightforward, concise, and provide "layman" explanation of technical terms that are used. Emphasis should be on completeness and clarity of content. Present the proposals in a format and order that corresponds to the numbering and lettering contained herein, with minimal reference to supporting documentation, so that proposals can be accurately compared. 1. Cover Letter a. Signed by an official authorized to bind the firm with the name, address, phone number, and email address of the firm's contract person who will be the city's contact for the remainder of the selection process. b. Location of the main office and the location of the office that would service the project. c. A validity statement that all information and pricing provided in the proposal is valid for at least ninety (90) days, and a statement that the individual who will perform the work for the City is free of any conflict of interest. d. Identification of any subcontractors and their responsibilities. 2. Firms Background, Qualifications, and Experience, including the following: a. Names and qualifications of all project team members and subcontractors and their assignments for the project. Those named must be those who will participate in the project if selected. Page 9 of 11 745 taQa�fra b. Descriptions of three (3) similar projects the consultant has conducted within the last five (5) years, with client references for each. Each reference shall include the complete contact information for the key city staff directly involved with the project. Provide a summary of the final outcome. c. Provide samples of related area plans, design guidelines or specific plans from comparable cities, including approach, organization and design. d. Resume of the project manager and all project team members who will work on the project. Resumes should be included as an Appendix. e. Number of years the firm has been in business and number of years performing the services in the proposal. f. Taxpayer identification number g. Firm ownership and if incorporated, list the state in which the firm is incorporated and the date of incorporation h. If the firm is a subsidiary of a parent company, identify the parent company+ 3. Project Understanding and Approach A description of the team's understanding of the project and how the project team will approach project development. 4. Scope of Work a. A discussion of the method of approach, analysis and skills provided. b. A description of the tasks, sub tasks, and specific deliverables that will be provided, for each phase outlined above. c. A clear identification of cooperation and responsibilities between the consulting team and City staff. d. Any other pertinent information deemed appropriate by the applicant. 5. Schedule/Timeline Proposals must include an estimated work schedule of actions or timeline with phased milestones, covering the entire process for development of the Master Plan. 6. Fee Schedule The applicant is to submit a detailed cost proposal for all services and materials, including the firm's direct and indirect rate (with overhead). Personnel hours and extended billing rates per classification of personnel will be indicated for each task and/or subtask defined therein and separated into the phases outlined above. The consultant shall determine a not -to -exceed allowance for reimbursements included within the cost proposal. 7. List of Complementary Services Offered by Proposer along with Corresponding Prices 8. Subcontracting Services Subcontracting any portion(s) of the Scope of Services is not preferred; however, if a proposer can demonstrate to the City's satisfaction that it is in the best interest of the project to permit a portion of the service(s) to be subcontracted by the proposer, it may be considered. Provide details on the role of any subcontractor that will be used. Assignment is prohibited. Page 10 of 11 746 taQa�fra 9. Disclosures Disclosure of any alleged significant prior or ongoing agreement failure, any civil or criminal litigation or investigation pending, which involved the proposer or in which the proposer has been judged guilty or liable within the last five (5) years. If there is no information to disclose, proposer must affirmatively state there is no negative history. 10. Acknowledgement of Insurance Requirements (Attachment 2) Proposals must include a written statement that, if selected, the proposer will provide the minimum insurance coverage and indemnification noted in Exhibits E and F, respectively, of the City's Agreement for Contract Services included as Attachment 1. 11. Non -Collusion Affidavit (Attachment 3) Proposals must include an executed Non -Collusion Affidavit, included as Attachment 3, executed by an official authorized to bind the firm. 12. Acknowledgement of Addenda (Attachment 4) If any addendum/addenda are issued, the proposer shall initial the Acknowledgement of Addenda, included as Attachment 4. ATTACHMENTS 1. Agreement for Contract Services 2. Insurance Requirements Acknowledgement Must be executed by proposer and submitted with the proposal 3. Non -Collusion Affidavit Must be executed by proposer and submitted with the proposal 4. Addenda Acknowledgement Must be executed by proposer and submitted with the proposal 5. Project Vicinity Map Page 11 of 11 747 ATTACHMENT 1 AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACT SERVICES This Agreement for Contract Services (the "Agreement") is made and entered into by and between the City of La Quinta, ("City"), a California Municipal Corporation and Charter City organized under the Constitution and laws of the State of California with its principal place of business at 78495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California 92253, and [insert name and type of business entity, e.g. sole proprietorship, California Limited Liability Corporation, etc], with a place of business at ("Contracting Party"). The parties hereto agree as follows: SERVICES OF CONTRACTING PARTY. 1.1 Scope of Services. In compliance with all terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall provide those services related to , as specified in the "Scope of Services" attached hereto as "Exhibit A" and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Services"). Contracting Party represents and warrants that Contracting Party is a provider of first-class work and/or services and Contracting Party is experienced in performing the Services contemplated herein and, in light of such status and experience, Contracting Party covenants that it shall follow industry standards in performing the Services required hereunder, and that all materials, if any, will be of good quality, fit for the purpose intended. For purposes of this Agreement, the phrase "industry standards" shall mean those standards of practice recognized by one or more first-class firms performing similar services under similar circumstances. 1.2 Compliance with Law. All Services rendered hereunder shall be provided in accordance with all ordinances, resolutions, statutes, rules, regulations, and laws of the City and any Federal, State, or local governmental agency of competent jurisdiction. 1.3 Wage and Hour Compliance. Contracting Party shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local wage and hour laws. 1.4 Licenses, Permits, Fees and Assessments. Except as otherwise specified herein, Contracting Party shall obtain at its sole cost and expense such licenses, permits, and approvals as may be required by law for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement, including a City of La Quinta business license. Contracting Party and its employees, agents, and subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any licenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. Contracting Party shall have the sole obligation to pay for any fees, assessments, and taxes, plus applicable penalties and interest, which may be imposed by law and arise from or are necessary for the performance of the Services required by this Agreement, and shall indemnify, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold City, its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents, free and harmless against any such fees, assessments, taxes, penalties, or interest levied, assessed, or imposed against City Revised — Sept. 2025 748 hereunder. Contracting Party shall be responsible for all subcontractors' compliance with this Section. 1.5 Familiarity with Work. By executing this Agreement, Contracting Party warrants that (a) it has thoroughly investigated and considered the Services to be performed, (b) it has investigated the site where the Services are to be performed, if any, and fully acquainted itself with the conditions there existing, (c) it has carefully considered how the Services should be performed, and (d) it fully understands the facilities, difficulties, and restrictions attending performance of the Services under this Agreement. Should Contracting Party discover any latent or unknown conditions materially differing from those inherent in the Services or as represented by City, Contracting Party shall immediately inform City of such fact and shall not proceed except at Contracting Party's risk until written instructions are received from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee (as defined in Section 4.2 hereof). 1.6 Standard of Care. Contracting Party acknowledges and understands that the Services contracted for under this Agreement require specialized skills and abilities and that, consistent with this understanding, Contracting Party's work will be held to an industry standard of quality and workmanship. Consistent with Section 1.5 hereinabove, Contracting Party represents to City that it holds the necessary skills and abilities to satisfy the industry standard of quality as set forth in this Agreement. Contracting Party shall adopt reasonable methods during the life of this Agreement to furnish continuous protection to the Services performed by Contracting Party, and the equipment, materials, papers, and other components thereof to prevent losses or damages, and shall be responsible for all such damages, to persons or property, until acceptance of the Services by City, except such losses or damages as may be caused by City's own negligence. The performance of Services by Contracting Party shall not relieve Contracting Party from any obligation to correct any incomplete, inaccurate, or defective work at no further cost to City, when such inaccuracies are due to the negligence of Contracting Party. 1.7 Additional Services. In accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall perform services in addition to those specified in the Scope of Services ("Additional Services") only when directed to do so by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, provided that Contracting Party shall not be required to perform any Additional Services without compensation. Contracting Party shall not perform any Additional Services until receiving prior written authorization through a duly executed written amendment or change order from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, incorporating therein any adjustment in (i) the Contract Sum, in accordance with Section 2.3 of this Agreement, and/or (ii) the time to perform this Agreement, which said adjustments are subject to the written approval of Contracting Party. It is expressly understood by Contracting Party that the provisions of this Section shall not apply to the Services specifically set forth in the Scope of Services or reasonably contemplated therein. It is specifically understood and agreed that oral requests and/or approvals of Additional Services shall be barred and are unenforceable. Failure of Contracting Party to secure the Contract Officer's, or assigned designee's written, authorization for Additional Services shall constitute a waiver of any and all right to adjustment of the Contract Sum or time to perform this Agreement, whether by way of compensation, _2_ 749 restitution, quantum meruit, or the like, for Additional Services provided without the appropriate authorization from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. 1.8 Special Requirements. Additional terms and conditions of this Agreement, if any, which are made a part hereof are set forth in "Exhibit D" (the "Special Requirements"), which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. In the event of a conflict between the provisions of the Special Requirements and any other provisions of this Agreement, the provisions of the Special Requirements shall govern. 2.1 Contract Sum. For the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be compensated in accordance with "Exhibit B" (the "Schedule of Compensation") in a total amount not to exceed Dollars ($ ), for the life of the Agreement, encompassing the Initial and any Extended Terms (the "Contract Sum"), except as provided in Section 1.7. The method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation may include a lump sum payment upon completion, payment in accordance with the percentage of completion of the Services, payment for time and materials based upon Contracting Party's rate schedule, but not exceeding the Contract Sum, or such other reasonable methods as may be specified in the Schedule of Compensation. The Contract Sum shall include the attendance of Contracting Party at all project meetings reasonably deemed necessary by City; Contracting Party shall not be entitled to any additional compensation for attending said meetings. Compensation may include reimbursement for actual and necessary expenditures for reproduction costs, transportation expense, telephone expense, and similar costs and expenses when and if specified in the Schedule of Compensation. Regardless of the method of compensation set forth in the Schedule of Compensation, Contracting Party's overall compensation shall not exceed the Contract Sum, except as provided in Section 1.7 of this Agreement. 2.2 Method of Billing & Payment. Any month in which Contracting Party wishes to receive payment, Contracting Party shall submit to City no later than the tenth (10th) working day of such month, in the form approved by City's Finance Director, an invoice for Services rendered prior to the date of the invoice. Such invoice shall (1) describe in detail the Services provided, including time and materials, and (2) specify each staff member who has provided Services and the number of hours assigned to each such staff member. Such invoice shall contain a certification by a principal member of Contracting Party specifying that the payment requested is for Services performed in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. Upon approval in writing by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, and subject to retention pursuant to Section 8.3, City will pay Contracting Party for all items stated thereon which are approved by City pursuant to this Agreement no later than thirty (30) days after invoices are received by the City's Finance Department. 2.3 Compensation for Additional Services. Additional Services approved in advance by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, pursuant to Section 1.7 of this _3_ 750 Agreement shall be paid for in an amount agreed to in writing through a duly executed amendment or change order by both City and Contracting Party in advance of the Additional Services being rendered by Contracting Party. Any compensation for Additional Services amounting to five percent (5%) of the Contract Sum or Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000), whichever is less, may be approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Any greater amount of compensation for Additional Services must be approved by the La Quinta City Council, the City Manager, or Department Director, depending upon City laws, regulations, rules and procedures concerning public contracting. Under no circumstances shall Contracting Party receive compensation for any Additional Services without prior written approval through a duly executed amendment or change order for the Additional Services is obtained from the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, pursuant to Section 1.7 of this Agreement. 3. PERFORMANCE SCHEDULE. 3.1 Time of Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of this Agreement. If the Services are not completed in accordance with the Schedule of Performance, as set forth in Section 3.2 and "Exhibit C", it is understood that the City will suffer damage. 3.2 Schedule of Performance. All Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be performed diligently and within the time period established in "Exhibit C" (the "Schedule of Performance"). Extensions to the time period specified in the Schedule of Performance may be approved in writing by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. 3.3 Force Majeure. The time period specified in the Schedule of Performance for performance of the Services rendered pursuant to this Agreement shall be extended because of any delays due to unforeseeable causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of Contracting Party, including, but not restricted to, acts of God or of the public enemy, fires, earthquakes, floods, epidemic, quarantine restrictions, riots, strikes, freight embargoes, acts of any governmental agency other than City, and unusually severe weather, if Contracting Party shall within ten (10) days of the commencement of such delay notify the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, in writing of the causes of the delay. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall ascertain the facts and the extent of delay, and extend the time for performing the Services for the period of the forced delay when and if in the Contract Officer's judgment such delay is justified, and the Contract Officer's determination, or assigned designee, shall be final and conclusive upon the parties to this Agreement. Extensions to time period in the Schedule of Performance which are determined by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, to be justified pursuant to this Section shall not entitle the Contracting Party to additional compensation in excess of the Contract Sum. 3.4 Term. Unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions in Article 8.0 of this Agreement, the term of this agreement shall commence on , 2024, and terminate on , 20 ("Initial Term"). This _4_ 751 Agreement may be extended for additional year(s) upon mutual agreement by both parties ("Extended Term"), and executed in writing. C��ZiZ� : � ► _ �P[i7��1�1�71:�1 4.1 Representative of Contracting Party. The following principals of Contracting Party ("Principals") are hereby designated as being the principals and representatives of Contracting Party authorized to act in its behalf with respect to the Services specified herein and make all decisions in connection therewith: (a) Name Telephone No.: Email- (b) Name Telephone No.: Email: It is expressly understood that the experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of the foregoing Principals were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Therefore, the foregoing Principals shall be responsible during the term of this Agreement for directing all activities of Contracting Party and devoting sufficient time to personally supervise the Services hereunder. For purposes of this Agreement, the foregoing Principals may not be changed by Contracting Party and no other personnel may be assigned to perform the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. 4.2 Contract Officer. The "Contract Officer", otherwise known as [ENTER NAME OF DEPARTMENT MANAGER OR DIRECTOR] or assigned designee may be designated in writing by the City Manager of the City. It shall be Contracting Party's responsibility to assure that the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, is kept informed of the progress of the performance of the Services, and Contracting Party shall refer any decisions, that must be made by City to the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Unless otherwise specified herein, any approval of City required hereunder shall mean the approval of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall have authority to sign all documents on behalf of City required hereunder to carry out the terms of this Agreement. 4.3 Prohibition Against Subcontracting or Assignment. The experience, knowledge, capability, and reputation of Contracting Party, its principals, and its employees were a substantial inducement for City to enter into this Agreement. Except as set forth in this Agreement, Contracting Party shall not contract or subcontract with any other entity to perform in whole or in part the Services required hereunder without the express written approval of City. In addition, neither this Agreement nor any interest herein may be transferred, assigned, conveyed, hypothecated, or encumbered, voluntarily or by operation of law, without the prior written approval of City. Transfers restricted hereunder shall include the transfer to any person or group of persons acting in concert of more than twenty five percent (25%) of the present ownership and/or control _5_ 752 of Contracting Party, taking all transfers into account on a cumulative basis. Any attempted or purported assignment or contracting or subcontracting by Contracting Party without City's express written approval shall be null, void, and of no effect. No approved transfer shall release Contracting Party of any liability hereunder without the express consent of City. 4.4 Independent Contractor. Neither City nor any of its employees shall have any control over the manner, mode, or means by which Contracting Party, its agents, or its employees, perform the Services required herein, except as otherwise set forth herein. City shall have no voice in the selection, discharge, supervision, or control of Contracting Party's employees, servants, representatives, or agents, or in fixing their number or hours of service. Contracting Party shall perform all Services required herein as an independent contractor of City and shall remain at all times as to City a wholly independent contractor with only such obligations as are consistent with that role. Contracting Party shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. City shall not in any way or for any purpose become or be deemed to be a partner of Contracting Party in its business or otherwise or a joint venture or a member of any joint enterprise with Contracting Party. Contracting Party shall have no power to incur any debt, obligation, or liability on behalf of City. Contracting Party shall not at any time or in any manner represent that it or any of its agents or employees are agents or employees of City. Except for the Contract Sum paid to Contracting Party as provided in this Agreement, City shall not pay salaries, wages, or other compensation to Contracting Party for performing the Services hereunder for City. City shall not be liable for compensation or indemnification to Contracting Party for injury or sickness arising out of performing the Services hereunder. Notwithstanding any other City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, law, or ordinance to the contrary, Contracting Party and any of its employees, agents, and subcontractors providing services under this Agreement shall not qualify for or become entitled to any compensation, benefit, or any incident of employment by City, including but not limited to eligibility to enroll in the California Public Employees Retirement System (TERS") as an employee of City and entitlement to any contribution to be paid by City for employer contributions and/or employee contributions for PERS benefits. Contracting Party agrees to pay all required taxes on amounts paid to Contracting Party under this Agreement, and to indemnify and hold City harmless from any and all taxes, assessments, penalties, and interest asserted against City by reason of the independent contractor relationship created by this Agreement. Contracting Party shall fully comply with the workers' compensation laws regarding Contracting Party and Contracting Party's employees. Contracting Party further agrees to indemnify and hold City harmless from any failure of Contracting Party to comply with applicable workers' compensation laws. City shall have the right to offset against the amount of any payment due to Contracting Party under this Agreement any amount due to City from Contracting Party as a result of Contracting Party's failure to promptly pay to City any reimbursement or indemnification arising under this Section. 4.5 Identity of Persons Performing Work. Contracting Party represents that it employs or will employ at its own expense all personnel required for the satisfactory performance of any and all of the Services set forth herein. Contracting Party represents that the Services required herein will be performed by Contracting Party or under its direct _g_ 753 supervision, and that all personnel engaged in such work shall be fully qualified and shall be authorized and permitted under applicable State and local law to perform such tasks and services. 4.6 City Cooperation. City shall provide Contracting Party with any plans, publications, reports, statistics, records, or other data or information pertinent to the Services to be performed hereunder which are reasonably available to Contracting Party only from or through action by City. 5. INSURANCE. 5.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of any Services under this Agreement and throughout the duration of the term of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall procure and maintain, at its sole cost and expense, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, policies of insurance as set forth in "Exhibit E" (the "Insurance Requirements") which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. 5.2 Proof of Insurance. Contracting Party shall provide Certificate of Insurance to Agency along with all required endorsements. Certificate of Insurance and endorsements must be approved by Agency's Risk Manager prior to commencement of performance. 6. INDEMNIFICATION. 6.1 Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless City and any and all of its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers as set forth in "Exhibit F" ("Indemnification") which is incorporated herein by this reference and expressly made a part hereof. 7. RECORDS AND REPORTS. 7.1 Reports. Contracting Party shall periodically prepare and submit to the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, such reports concerning Contracting Party's performance of the Services required by this Agreement as the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall require. Contracting Party hereby acknowledges that City is greatly concerned about the cost of the Services to be performed pursuant to this Agreement. For this reason, Contracting Party agrees that if Contracting Party becomes aware of any facts, circumstances, techniques, or events that may or will materially increase or decrease the cost of the Services contemplated herein or, if Contracting Party is providing design services, the cost of the project being designed, Contracting Party shall promptly notify the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, of said fact, circumstance, technique, or event and the estimated increased or decreased cost related thereto and, if Contracting Party is providing design services, the estimated increased or decreased cost estimate for the project being designed. 7 754 7.2 Records. Contracting Party shall keep, and require any subcontractors to keep, such ledgers, books of accounts, invoices, vouchers, canceled checks, reports (including but not limited to payroll reports), studies, or other documents relating to the disbursements charged to City and the Services performed hereunder (the "Books and Records"), as shall be necessary to perform the Services required by this Agreement and enable the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, to evaluate the performance of such Services. Any and all such Books and Records shall be maintained in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and shall be complete and detailed. The Contract Officer, or assigned designee, shall have full and free access to such Books and Records at all times during normal business hours of City, including the right to inspect, copy, audit, and make records and transcripts from such Books and Records. Such Books and Records shall be maintained for a period of three (3) years following completion of the Services hereunder, and City shall have access to such Books and Records in the event any audit is required. In the event of dissolution of Contracting Party's business, custody of the Books and Records may be given to City, and access shall be provided by Contracting Party's successor in interest. Under California Government Code Section 8546.7, if the amount of public funds expended under this Agreement exceeds Ten Thousand Dollars ($10,000.00), this Agreement shall be subject to the examination and audit of the State Auditor, at the request of City or as part of any audit of City, for a period of three (3) years after final payment under this Agreement. 7.3 Ownership of Documents. All drawings, specifications, maps, designs, photographs, studies, surveys, data, notes, computer files, reports, records, documents, and other materials plans, drawings, estimates, test data, survey results, models, renderings, and other documents or works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression, including but not limited to, physical drawings, digital renderings, or data stored digitally, magnetically, or in any other medium prepared or caused to be prepared by Contracting Party, its employees, subcontractors, and agents in the performance of this Agreement (the "Documents and Materials") shall be the property of City and shall be delivered to City upon request of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, or upon the expiration or termination of this Agreement, and Contracting Party shall have no claim for further employment or additional compensation as a result of the exercise by City of its full rights of ownership use, reuse, or assignment of the Documents and Materials hereunder. Any use, reuse or assignment of such completed Documents and Materials for other projects and/or use of uncompleted documents without specific written authorization by Contracting Party will be at City's sole risk and without liability to Contracting Party, and Contracting Party's guarantee and warranties shall not extend to such use, revise, or assignment. Contracting Party may retain copies of such Documents and Materials for its own use. Contracting Party shall have an unrestricted right to use the concepts embodied therein. All subcontractors shall provide for assignment to City of any Documents and Materials prepared by them, and in the event Contracting Party fails to secure such assignment, Contracting Party shall indemnify City for all damages resulting therefrom. 7.4 In the event City or any person, firm, or corporation authorized by City reuses said Documents and Materials without written verification or adaptation by Contracting Party for the specific purpose intended and causes to be made or makes any _g 755 changes or alterations in said Documents and Materials, City hereby releases, discharges, and exonerates Contracting Party from liability resulting from said change. The provisions of this clause shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement and shall thereafter remain in full force and effect. 7.5 Licensing of Intellectual Property. This Agreement creates a non-exclusive and perpetual license for City to copy, use, modify, reuse, or sublicense any and all copyrights, designs, rights of reproduction, and other intellectual property embodied in the Documents and Materials. Contracting Party shall require all subcontractors, if any, to agree in writing that City is granted a non-exclusive and perpetual license for the Documents and Materials the subcontractor prepares under this Agreement. Contracting Party represents and warrants that Contracting Party has the legal right to license any and all of the Documents and Materials. Contracting Party makes no such representation and warranty in regard to the Documents and Materials which were prepared by design professionals other than Contracting Party or provided to Contracting Party by City. City shall not be limited in any way in its use of the Documents and Materials at any time, provided that any such use not within the purposes intended by this Agreement shall be at City's sole risk. 7.6 Release of Documents. The Documents and Materials shall not be released publicly without the prior written approval of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, or as required by law. Contracting Party shall not disclose to any other entity or person any information regarding the activities of City, except as required by law or as authorized by City. 7.7 Confidential or Personal Identifying Information. Contracting Party covenants that all City data, data lists, trade secrets, documents with personal identifying information, documents that are not public records, draft documents, discussion notes, or other information, if any, developed or received by Contracting Party or provided for performance of this Agreement are deemed confidential and shall not be disclosed by Contracting Party to any person or entity without prior written authorization by City or unless required by law. City shall grant authorization for disclosure if required by any lawful administrative or legal proceeding, court order, or similar directive with the force of law. All City data, data lists, trade secrets, documents with personal identifying information, documents that are not public records, draft documents, discussions, or other information shall be returned to City upon the termination or expiration of this Agreement. Contracting Party's covenant under this section shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement. 8.1 California Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted, construed, and governed both as to validity and to performance of the parties in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Legal actions concerning any dispute, claim, or matter arising out of or in relation to this Agreement shall be instituted in the Superior Court of the County of Riverside, State of California, or any other appropriate court in such county, and 9 756 Contracting Party covenants and agrees to submit to the personal jurisdiction of such court in the event of such action. 8.2 Disputes. In the event of any dispute arising under this Agreement, the injured party shall notify the injuring party in writing of its contentions by submitting a claim therefore. The injured party shall continue performing its obligations hereunder so long as the injuring party commences to cure such default within ten (10) days of service of such notice and completes the cure of such default within forty-five (45) days after service of the notice, or such longer period as may be permitted by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee; provided that if the default is an immediate danger to the health, safety, or general welfare, City may take such immediate action as City deems warranted. Compliance with the provisions of this Section shall be a condition precedent to termination of this Agreement for cause and to any legal action, and such compliance shall not be a waiver of any party's right to take legal action in the event that the dispute is not cured, provided that nothing herein shall limit City's right to terminate this Agreement without cause pursuant to this Article 8.0. During the period of time that Contracting Party is in default, City shall hold all invoices and shall, when the default is cured, proceed with payment on the invoices. In the alternative, City may, in its sole discretion, elect to pay some or all of the outstanding invoices during any period of default. 8.3 Retention of Funds. City may withhold from any monies payable to Contracting Party sufficient funds to compensate City for any losses, costs, liabilities, or damages it reasonably believes were suffered by City due to the default of Contracting Party in the performance of the Services required by this Agreement. 8.4 Waiver. No delay or omission in the exercise of any right or remedy of a non -defaulting party on any default shall impair such right or remedy or be construed as a waiver. City's consent or approval of any act by Contracting Party requiring City's consent or approval shall not be deemed to waive or render unnecessary City's consent to or approval of any subsequent act of Contracting Party. Any waiver by either party of any default must be in writing and shall not be a waiver of any other default concerning the same or any other provision of this Agreement. 8.5 Rights and Remedies are Cumulative. Except with respect to rights and remedies expressly declared to be exclusive in this Agreement, the rights and remedies of the parties are cumulative and the exercise by either party of one or more of such rights or remedies shall not preclude the exercise by it, at the same or different times, of any other rights or remedies for the same default or any other default by the other party. 8.6 Legal Action. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may take legal action, at law or at equity, to cure, correct, or remedy any default, to recover damages for any default, to compel specific performance of this Agreement, to obtain declaratory or injunctive relief, or to obtain any other remedy consistent with the purposes of this Agreement. 8.7 Termination Prior To Expiration of Term. This Section shall govern any termination of this Agreement, except as specifically provided in the following Section for -10- 757 termination for cause. City reserves the right to terminate this Agreement at any time, with or without cause, upon thirty (30) days' written notice to Contracting Party. Upon receipt of any notice of termination, Contracting Party shall immediately cease all Services hereunder except such as may be specifically approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Contracting Party shall be entitled to compensation for all Services rendered prior to receipt of the notice of termination and for any Services authorized by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, thereafter in accordance with the Schedule of Compensation or such as may be approved by the Contract Officer, or assigned designee, except amounts held as a retention pursuant to this Agreement. 8.8 Termination for Default of Contracting Party. If termination is due to the failure of Contracting Party to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, Contracting Party shall vacate any City -owned property which Contracting Party is permitted to occupy hereunder and City may, after compliance with the provisions of Section 8.2, take over the Services and prosecute the same to completion by contract or otherwise, and Contracting Party shall be liable to the extent that the total cost for completion of the Services required hereunder exceeds the compensation herein stipulated (provided that City shall use reasonable efforts to mitigate such damages), and City may withhold any payments to Contracting Party for the purpose of setoff or partial payment of the amounts owed City. 8.9 Attorneys' Fees. If either party to this Agreement is required to initiate or defend or made a party to any action or proceeding in any way connected with this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief which may be granted, whether legal or equitable, shall be entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees; provided, however, that the attorneys' fees awarded pursuant to this Section shall not exceed the hourly rate paid by City for legal services multiplied by the reasonable number of hours spent by the prevailing party in the conduct of the litigation. Attorneys' fees shall include attorneys' fees on any appeal, and in addition a party entitled to attorneys' fees shall be entitled to all other reasonable costs for investigating such action, taking depositions and discovery, and all other necessary costs the court allows which are incurred in such litigation. All such fees shall be deemed to have accrued on commencement of such action and shall be enforceable whether or not such action is prosecuted to judgment. The court may set such fees in the same action or in a separate action brought for that purpose. 9. CITY OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES: NONDISCRIMINATION. 9.1 Non -liability of City Officers and Employees. No officer, official, employee, agent, representative, or volunteer of City shall be personally liable to Contracting Party, or any successor in interest, in the event or any default or breach by City or for any amount which may become due to Contracting Party or to its successor, or for breach of any obligation of the terms of this Agreement. 9.2 Conflict of Interest. Contracting Party covenants that neither it, nor any officer or principal of it, has or shall acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would conflict in any manner with the interests of City or which would in any way hinder -1 1- 758 Contracting Party's performance of the Services under this Agreement. Contracting Party further covenants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having any such interest shall be employed by it as an officer, employee, agent, or subcontractor without the express written consent of the Contract Officer, or assigned designee. Contracting Party agrees to at all times avoid conflicts of interest or the appearance of any conflicts of interest with the interests of City in the performance of this Agreement. No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this Agreement nor shall any such officer or employee participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which effects his financial interest or the financial interest of any corporation, partnership or association in which he is, directly or indirectly, interested, in violation of any State statute or regulation. Contracting Party warrants that it has not paid or given and will not pay or give any third party any money or other consideration for obtaining this Agreement. 9.3 Covenant against Discrimination. Contracting Party covenants that, by and for itself, its heirs, executors, assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of any impermissible classification including, but not limited to, race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry in the performance of this Agreement. Contracting Party shall take affirmative action to ensure that applicants are employed and that employees are treated during employment without regard to their race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, sexual orientation, national origin, or ancestry. 10. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 10.1 Notice. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication either party desires or is required to give the other party or any other person shall be in writing and either served personally or sent by prepaid, first-class mail to the address set forth below. Either party may change its address by notifying the other party of the change of address in writing. Notice shall be deemed communicated forty-eight (48) hours from the time of mailing if mailed as provided in this Section. To City: To Contracting Party: CITY OF LA QUINTA XXXXXXXX Attention: 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 10.2 Interpretation. The terms of this Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the meaning of the language used and shall not be construed for or against either party by reason of the authorship of this Agreement or any other rule of construction which might otherwise apply. -12- 759 10.3 Section Headings and Subheadings. The section headings and subheadings contained in this Agreement are included for convenience only and shall not limit or otherwise affect the terms of this Agreement. 10.4 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, and such counterparts shall constitute one and the same instrument. 10.5 Integrated Agreement. This Agreement including the exhibits hereto is the entire, complete, and exclusive expression of the understanding of the parties. It is understood that there are no oral agreements between the parties hereto affecting this Agreement and this Agreement supersedes and cancels any and all previous negotiations, arrangements, agreements, and understandings, if any, between the parties, and none shall be used to interpret this Agreement. 10.6 Amendment. No amendment to or modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless made in writing and approved by Contracting Party and by the City Council of City. The parties agree that this requirement for written modifications cannot be waived and that any attempted waiver shall be void. 10.7 Severability. In the event that any one or more of the articles, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections contained in this Agreement shall be declared invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the remaining articles, phrases, sentences, clauses, paragraphs, or sections of this Agreement which are hereby declared as severable and shall be interpreted to carry out the intent of the parties hereunder unless the invalid provision is so material that its invalidity deprives either party of the basic benefit of their bargain or renders this Agreement meaningless. 10.8 Unfair Business Practices Claims. In entering into this Agreement, Contracting Party offers and agrees to assign to City all rights, title, and interest in and to all causes of action it may have under Section 4 of the Clayton Act (15 U.S.C. § 15) or under the Cartwright Act (Chapter 2, (commencing with Section 16700) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code), arising from purchases of goods, services, or materials related to this Agreement. This assignment shall be made and become effective at the time City renders final payment to Contracting Party without further acknowledgment of the parties. 10.9 No Third -Party Beneficiaries. With the exception of the specific provisions set forth in this Agreement, there are no intended third -party beneficiaries under this Agreement and no such other third parties shall have any rights or obligations hereunder. 10.10 Authority. The persons executing this Agreement on behalf of each of the parties hereto represent and warrant that (i) such party is duly organized and existing, (ii) they are duly authorized to execute and deliver this Agreement on behalf of said party, (iii) by so executing this Agreement, such party is formally bound to the provisions of this Agreement, and (iv) that entering into this Agreement does not violate any provision of -13- 760 any other Agreement to which said party is bound. This Agreement shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators, successors, and assigns of the parties. [SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE] IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement as of the dates stated below. CITY OF LA QUINTA, CONTRACTING PARTY: a California Municipal Corporation JON MCMILLEN, City Manager City of La Quinta, California Dated: ATTEST: MONIKA RADEVA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: WILLIAM H. IHRKE, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California By:_ Name: Title: By:_ Name: Title: -15- 762 Exhibit A Scope of Services Services to be Provided: [TO BE PROVIDED BY STAFF (include location of work)] 2. Performance Standards: [TO BE PROVIDED BY STAFF] •o [See Attached] Exhibit A Page 1 of 4 Last revised summer 18 ADDENDUM TO AGREEMENT Re: Scope of Services If the Scope of Services include construction, alteration, demolition, installation, repair, or maintenance affecting real property or structures or improvements of any kind appurtenant to real property, the following apply: 1. Prevailing Wage Compliance. If Contracting Party is a contractor performing public works and maintenance projects, as described in this Section 1.3, Contracting Party shall comply with applicable Federal, State, and local laws. Contracting Party is aware of the requirements of California Labor Code Sections 1720, et seq., and 1770, et seq., as well as California Code of Regulations, Title 8, Sections 16000, et seq., (collectively, the "Prevailing Wage Laws"), and La Quinta Municipal Code Section 3.12.040, which require the payment of prevailing wage rates and the performance of other requirements on "Public works" and "Maintenance" projects. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "Public works" or "Maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, and if construction work over twenty- five thousand dollars ($25,000.00) and/or alterations, demolition, repair or maintenance work over fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000.00) is entered into or extended on or after January 1, 2015 by this Agreement, Contracting Party agrees to fully comply with such Prevailing Wage Laws including, but not limited to, requirements related to the maintenance of payroll records and the employment of apprentices. Pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1725.5, no contractor or subcontractor may be awarded a contract for public work on a "Public works" project unless registered with the California Department of Industrial Relations ("DIR") at the time the contract is awarded. If the Services are being performed as part of an applicable "Public works" or "Maintenance" project, as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws, this project is subject to compliance monitoring and enforcement by the DIR. Contracting Party will maintain and will require all subcontractors to maintain valid and current DIR Public Works contractor registration during the term of this Agreement. Contracting Party shall notify City in writing immediately, and in no case more than twenty-four (24) hours, after receiving any information that Contracting Party's or any of its subcontractor's DIR registration status has been suspended, revoked, expired, or otherwise changed. It is understood that it is the responsibility of Contracting Party to determine the correct salary scale. Contracting Party shall make copies of the prevailing rates of per diem wages for each craft, classification, or type of worker needed to execute the Services available to interested parties upon request, and shall post copies at Contracting Party's principal place of business and at the project site, if any. The statutory penalties for failure to pay prevailing wage or to comply with State wage and hour laws will be enforced. Contracting Party must forfeit to City TWENTY-FIVE DOLLARS ($25.00) per day for each worker who works in excess of the minimum working hours when Contracting Party does not pay overtime. In accordance with the provisions of Labor Code Sections 1810 et seq., eight (8) hours is the legal working day. Contracting Party also shall comply with State law requirements to maintain payroll records and shall provide for certified records and inspection of records as required by California Labor Code Section 1770 et seq., including Section 1776. In addition to the other indemnities provided under this Agreement, Contracting Party shall defend (with counsel selected by City), indemnify, and hold City, Exhibit A Page 2 of 4 764 its elected officials, officers, employees, and agents free and harmless from any claim or liability arising out of any failure or alleged failure to comply with the Prevailing Wage Laws. It is agreed by the parties that, in connection with performance of the Services, including, without limitation, any and all "Public works" (as defined by the Prevailing Wage Laws), Contracting Party shall bear all risks of payment or non-payment of prevailing wages under California law and/or the implementation of Labor Code Section 1781, as the same may be amended from time to time, and/or any other similar law. Contracting Party acknowledges and agrees that it shall be independently responsible for reviewing the applicable laws and regulations and effectuating compliance with such laws. Contracting Party shall require the same of all subcontractors. 2. Retention. Payments shall be made in accordance with the provisions of Article 2.0 of the Agreement. In accordance with said Sections, City shall pay Contracting Party a sum based upon ninety-five percent (95%) of the Contract Sum apportionment of the labor and materials incorporated into the Services under this Agreement during the month covered by said invoice. The remaining five percent (5%) thereof shall be retained as performance security to be paid to Contracting Party within sixty (60) days after final acceptance of the Services by the City Council of City, after Contracting Party has furnished City with a full release of all undisputed payments under this Agreement, if required by City. In the event there are any claims specifically excluded by Contracting Party from the operation of the release, City may retain proceeds (per Public Contract Code § 7107) of up to one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the amount in dispute. City's failure to deduct or withhold shall not affect Contracting Party's obligations under the Agreement. 3. Utility Relocation. City is responsible for removal, relocation, or protection of existing main or trunk -line utilities to the extent such utilities were not identified in the invitation for bids or specifications. City shall reimburse Contracting Party for any costs incurred in locating, repairing damage not caused by Contracting Party, and removing or relocating such unidentified utility facilities. Contracting Party shall not be assessed liquidated damages for delay arising from the removal or relocation of such unidentified utility facilities. 4. Trenches or Excavations. Pursuant to California Public Contract Code Section 7104, in the event the work included in this Agreement requires excavations more than four (4) feet in depth, the following shall apply: (a) Contracting Party shall promptly, and before the following conditions are disturbed, notify City, in writing, of any: (1) material that Contracting Party believes may be material that is hazardous waste, as defined in Section 25117 of the Health and Safety Code, that is required to be removed to a Class I, Class II, or Class III disposal site in accordance with provisions of existing law; (2) subsurface or latent physical conditions at the site different from those indicated by information about the site made available to bidders prior to the deadline for submitting bids; or (3) unknown physical conditions at the site of any unusual nature, different materially from those ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in work of the character provided for in the Agreement. Exhibit A Page 3 of 4 765 (b) City shall promptly investigate the conditions, and if it finds that the conditions do materially so differ, or do involve hazardous waste, and cause a decrease or increase in Contracting Party's cost of, or the time required for, performance of any part of the work shall issue a change order per Section 1.8 of the Agreement. (c) in the event that a dispute arises between City and Contracting Party whether the conditions materially differ, or involve hazardous waste, or cause a decrease or increase in Contracting Party's cost of, or time required for, performance of any part of the work, Contracting Party shall not be excused from any scheduled completion date provided for by this Agreement, but shall proceed with all work to be performed under this Agreement. Contracting Party shall retain any and all rights provided either by contract or by law which pertain to the resolution of disputes and protests between the contracting Parties. 5. Safety. Contracting Party shall execute and maintain its work so as to avoid injury or damage to any person or property. In carrying out the Services, Contracting Party shall at all times be in compliance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws, rules and regulations, and shall exercise all necessary precautions for the safety of employees appropriate to the nature of the work and the conditions under which the work is to be performed. Safety precautions as applicable shall include, but shall not be limited to: (A) adequate life protection and lifesaving equipment and procedures; (B) instructions in accident prevention for all employees and subcontractors, such as safe walkways, scaffolds, fall protection ladders, bridges, gang planks, confined space procedures, trenching and shoring, equipment and other safety devices, equipment and wearing apparel as are necessary or lawfully required to prevent accidents or injuries; and (C) adequate facilities for the proper inspection and maintenance of all safety measures. 6. Liquidated Damages. Since the determination of actual damages for any delay in performance of the Agreement would be extremely difficult or impractical to determine in the event of a breach of this Agreement, Contracting Party shall be liable for and shall pay to City the sum of One Thousand dollars ($1,000.00) as liquidated damages for each working day of delay in the performance of any of the Services required hereunder, as specified in the Schedule of Performance. In addition, liquidated damages may be assessed for failure to comply with the emergency call out requirements, if any, described in the Scope of Services. City may withhold from any moneys payable on account of the Services performed by Contracting Party any accrued liquidated damages. Exhibit A Page 4 of 4 766 Exhibit B Schedule of Compensation For the avoidance of doubt, the compensation thresholds on this Exhibit B do not include compensation for Additional Services (if any) authorized pursuant to Section 1.7 and compensated pursuant to Section 2.3 of this Agreement. Contract Sum Compensation for Services shall not exceed the following Contract Sum for the entire life of this Agreement including the Initial and Extended terms: ($ ), to be paid for duly authorized Services performed consistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement. The Contract Sum shall be paid to Contracting Party in installment payments made on a monthly basis and in an amount identified in Contracting Party's schedule of compensation attached hereto for the work tasks performed and properly invoiced by Contracting Party in conformance with Section 2.2 of this Agreement. Exhibit B Page 1 of 1 767 Exhibit C Schedule of Performance Contracting Party shall complete all services identified in the Scope of Services, Exhibit A of this Agreement, in accordance with the Project Schedule, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. Exhibit C Page 1 of 1 .: Exhibit D Special Requirements [insert Special Requirements or indicate "None" if there are none] Exhibit D Page 1 of 1 769 Exhibit E Insurance Requirements E.1 Insurance. Prior to the beginning of and throughout the duration of this Agreement, the following policies checked below shall be maintained and kept in full force and effect providing insurance with minimum limits as indicated below and issued by insurers with A.M. Best ratings of no less than A -VI: Commercial General Liability (at least as broad as ISO CG 0001): ❑ $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate OR ❑ $2,000,000 per occurrence/$4,000,000 aggregate Must include the following endorsements: General Liability Additional Insured General Liability Primary and Non-contributory Commercial Automobile Liability (at least as broad as ISO CA 0001): ❑ $1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage ❑ Auto Liability Additional Insured Workers' Compensation (per statutory requirements): ❑ Statutory Limits / Employer's Liability $1,000,000 per accident or disease Must include the following endorsements: Workers' Compensation Endorsement with Waiver of Subrogation; OR Workers' Compensation Declaration of Sole Proprietor (if applicable) Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions): ❑ Errors and Omissions liability insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per claim Cyber Liability ❑ $1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate Exhibit E Page 1 of 6 770 Contracting Party shall procure and maintain, at its cost, and submit concurrently with its execution of this Agreement, Commercial General Liability insurance against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property resulting from Contracting Party's acts or omissions rising out of or related to Contracting Party's performance under this Agreement. The insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that the coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contracting Party's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to any such loss. An endorsement evidencing the foregoing and naming the City and its officers and employees as additional insured (on the Commercial General Liability policy only) must be submitted concurrently with the execution of this Agreement and approved by City prior to commencement of the services hereunder. Contracting Party shall carry automobile liability insurance of $1,000,000 per accident against all claims for injuries against persons or damages to property arising out of the use of any automobile by Contracting Party, its officers, any person directly or indirectly employed by Contracting Party, any subcontractor or agent, or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable, arising directly or indirectly out of or related to Contracting Party's performance under this Agreement. If Contracting Party or Contracting Party's employees will use personal autos in any way on this project, Contracting Party shall provide evidence of personal auto liability coverage for each such person. The term "automobile" includes, but is not limited to, a land motor vehicle, trailer or semi -trailer designed for travel on public roads. The automobile insurance policy shall contain a severability of interest clause providing that coverage shall be primary for losses arising out of Contracting Party's performance hereunder and neither City nor its insurers shall be required to contribute to such loss. Contracting Party shall carry Workers' Compensation Insurance in accordance with State Worker's Compensation laws with employer's liability limits no less than $1,000,000 per accident or disease. Professional Liability or Errors and Omissions Insurance as appropriate shall be written on a policy form coverage specifically designed to protect against acts, errors or omissions of the Contracting Party and "Covered Professional Services" as designated in the policy must specifically include work performed under this agreement. The policy limit shall be no less than $1,000,000 per claim and in the aggregate. The policy must "pay on behalf of the insured and must include a provision establishing the insurer's duty to defend. The policy retroactive date shall be on or before the effective date of this agreement. Contracting Party shall procure and maintain Cyber Liability insurance with limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence/loss which shall include the following coverage: a. Liability arising from the theft, dissemination and/or use of confidential or personally identifiable information; including credit monitoring and regulatory fines arising from such theft, dissemination or use of the confidential information. Exhibit E Page 2 of 6 771 b. Network security liability arising from the unauthorized use of, access to, or tampering with computer systems. c. Liability arising from the failure of technology products (software) required under the contract for Consultant to properly perform the services intended. d. Electronic Media Liability arising from personal injury, plagiarism or misappropriation of ideas, domain name infringement or improper deep - linking or framing, and infringement or violation of intellectual property rights. e. Liability arising from the failure to render professional services. If coverage is maintained on a claims -made basis, Contracting Party shall maintain such coverage for an additional period of three (3) years following termination of the contract. Contracting Party shall provide written notice to City within ten (10) working days if: (1) any of the required insurance policies is terminated; (2) the limits of any of the required polices are reduced; or (3) the deductible or self -insured retention is increased. In the event any of said policies of insurance are cancelled, Contracting Party shall, prior to the cancellation date, submit new evidence of insurance in conformance with this Exhibit to the Contract Officer. The procuring of such insurance or the delivery of policies or certificates evidencing the same shall not be construed as a limitation of Contracting Party's obligation to indemnify City, its officers, employees, contractors, subcontractors, or agents. E.2 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have if Contracting Party fails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option: a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under this Agreement. b. Order Contracting Party to stop work under this Agreement and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to Contracting Party hereunder until Contracting Party demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. C. Terminate this Agreement. Exercise any of the above remedies, however, is an alternative to any other remedies City may have. The above remedies are not the exclusive remedies for Contracting Party's failure to maintain or secure appropriate policies or endorsements. Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which Contracting Party may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from Contracting Party's or its subcontractors' performance of work under this Agreement. Exhibit E Page 3 of 6 772 E.3 General Conditions Pertaining to Provisions of Insurance Coverage by Contracting Party. Contracting Party and City agree to the following with respect to insurance provided by Contracting Party: 1. Contracting Party agrees to have its insurer endorse the third party general liability coverage required herein to include as additional insureds City, its officials, employees, and agents, using standard ISO endorsement No. CG 2010 with an edition prior to 1992. Contracting Party also agrees to require all contractors, and subcontractors to do likewise. 2. No liability insurance coverage provided to comply with this Agreement shall prohibit Contracting Party, or Contracting Party's employees, or agents, from waiving the right of subrogation prior to a loss. Contracting Party agrees to waive subrogation rights against City regardless of the applicability of any insurance proceeds, and to require all contractors and subcontractors to do likewise. 3. All insurance coverage and limits provided by Contracting Party and available or applicable to this Agreement are intended to apply to the full extent of the policies. Nothing contained in this Agreement or any other agreement relating to City or its operations limits the application of such insurance coverage. 4. None of the coverages required herein will be in compliance with these requirements if they include any limiting endorsement of any kind that has not been first submitted to City and approved of in writing. 5. No liability policy shall contain any provision or definition that would serve to eliminate so-called "third party action over" claims, including any exclusion for bodily injury to an employee of the insured or of any contractor or subcontractor. 6. All coverage types and limits required are subject to approval, modification and additional requirements by the City, as the need arises. Contracting Party shall not make any reductions in scope of coverage (e.g. elimination of contractual liability or reduction of discovery period) that may affect City's protection without City's prior written consent. 7. Proof of compliance with these insurance requirements, consisting of certificates of insurance evidencing all the coverages required and an additional insured endorsement to Contracting Party's general liability policy, shall be delivered to City at or prior to the execution of this Agreement. In the event such proof of any insurance is not delivered as required, or in the event such insurance is canceled at any time and no replacement coverage is provided, City has the right, but not the duty, to obtain any insurance it deems necessary to protect its interests under this or any other agreement and to pay the premium. Any premium so paid by City shall be charged to and promptly paid by Contracting Party or deducted from sums due Contracting Party, at City option. 8. It is acknowledged by the parties of this agreement that all insurance coverage required to be provided by Contracting Party or any subcontractor, is intended Exhibit E Page 4 of 6 773 to apply first and on a primary, non-contributing basis in relation to any other insurance or self-insurance available to City. 9. Contracting Party agrees to ensure that subcontractors, and any other party involved with the project that is brought onto or involved in the project by Contracting Party, provide the same minimum insurance coverage required of Contracting Party. Contracting Party agrees to monitor and review all such coverage and assumes all responsibility for ensuring that such coverage is provided in conformity with the requirements of this section. Contracting Party agrees that upon request, all agreements with subcontractors and others engaged in the project will be submitted to City for review. 10. Contracting Party agrees not to self -insure or to use any self -insured retentions or deductibles on any portion of the insurance required herein (with the exception of professional liability coverage, if required) and further agrees that it will not allow any contractor, subcontractor, Architect, Engineer or other entity or person in any way involved in the performance of work on the project contemplated by this agreement to self -insure its obligations to City. If Contracting Party's existing coverage includes a deductible or self -insured retention, the deductible or self -insured retention must be declared to the City. At that time the City shall review options with the Contracting Party, which may include reduction or elimination of the deductible or self -insured retention, substitution of other coverage, or other solutions. 11. The City reserves the right at any time during the term of this Agreement to change the amounts and types of insurance required by giving the Contracting Party ninety (90) days advance written notice of such change. If such change results in substantial additional cost to the Contracting Party, the City will negotiate additional compensation proportional to the increased benefit to City. 12. For purposes of applying insurance coverage only, this Agreement will be deemed to have been executed immediately upon any party hereto taking any steps that can be deemed to be in furtherance of or towards performance of this Agreement. 13. Contracting Party acknowledges and agrees that any actual or alleged failure on the part of City to inform Contracting Party of non-compliance with any insurance requirement in no way imposes any additional obligations on City nor does it waive any rights hereunder in this or any other regard. 14. Contracting Party will renew the required coverage annually as long as City, or its employees or agents face an exposure from operations of any type pursuant to this agreement. This obligation applies whether the agreement is canceled or terminated for any reason. Termination of this obligation is not effective until City executes a written statement to that effect. 15. Contracting Party shall provide proof that policies of insurance required herein expiring during the term of this Agreement have been renewed or replaced with other policies providing at least the same coverage. Proof that such coverage has been ordered shall be submitted prior to expiration. A coverage binder or letter from Exhibit E Page 5 of 6 774 Contracting Party's insurance agent to this effect is acceptable. A certificate of insurance and an additional insured endorsement is required in these specifications applicable to the renewing or new coverage must be provided to City within five (5) days of the expiration of coverages. 16. The provisions of any workers' compensation or similar act will not limit the obligations of Contracting Party under this agreement. Contracting Party expressly agrees not to use any statutory immunity defenses under such laws with respect to City, its employees, officials, and agents. 17. Requirements of specific coverage features, or limits contained in this section are not intended as limitations on coverage, limits or other requirements nor as a waiver of any coverage normally provided by any given policy. Specific reference to a given coverage feature is for purposes of clarification only as it pertains to a given issue and is not intended by any party or insured to be limiting or all-inclusive. 18. These insurance requirements are intended to be separate and distinct from any other provision in this Agreement and are intended by the parties here to be interpreted as such. 19. The requirements in this Exhibit supersede all other sections and provisions of this Agreement to the extent that any other section or provision conflicts with or impairs the provisions of this Exhibit. 20. Contracting Party agrees to be responsible for ensuring that no contract used by any party involved in any way with the project reserves the right to charge City or Contracting Party for the cost of additional insurance coverage required by this agreement. Any such provisions are to be deleted with reference to City. It is not the intent of City to reimburse any third party for the cost of complying with these requirements. There shall be no recourse against City for payment of premiums or other amounts with respect thereto. 21. Contracting Party agrees to provide immediate notice to City of any claim or loss against Contracting Party arising out of the work performed under this agreement. City assumes no obligation or liability by such notice, but has the right (but not the duty) to monitor the handling of any such claim or claims if they are likely to involve City. Exhibit E Page 6 of 6 775 Exhibit F Indemnification F.1 Indemnity for the Benefit of City. a. Indemnification for Professional Liability. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party's Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, protect, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all claims, losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused in whole or in part by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party. b. Indemnification for Other Than Professional Liability. Other than in the performance of professional services and to the full extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify, defend (with counsel selected by City), and hold harmless the Indemnified Parties from and against any liability (including liability for claims, suits, actions, arbitration proceedings, administrative proceedings, regulatory proceedings, losses, expenses or costs of any kind, whether actual, alleged or threatened, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses) incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, where the same arise out of, are a consequence of, or are in any way attributable to, in whole or in part, the performance of this Agreement by Contracting Party or by any individual or entity for which Contracting Party is legally liable, including but not limited to officers, agents, employees, or subcontractors of Contracting Party. C. Indemnity Provisions for Contracts Related to Construction (Limitation on Indemnity). Without affecting the rights of City under any provision of this agreement, Contracting Party shall not be required to indemnify and hold harmless City for liability attributable to the active negligence of City, provided such active negligence is determined by agreement between the parties or by the findings of a court of competent jurisdiction. In instances where City is shown to have been actively negligent and where City's active negligence accounts for only a percentage of the liability involved, the obligation of Contracting Party will be for that entire portion or percentage of liability not attributable to the active negligence of City. Exhibit F Page 1 of 2 776 d. Indemnification Provision for Desian Professionals. 1. Applicability of this Section F.1 M. Notwithstanding Section F.1(a) hereinabove, the following indemnification provision shall apply to a Contracting Party who constitutes a "design professional" as the term is defined in paragraph 3 below. 2. Scope of Indemnification. When the law establishes a professional standard of care for Contracting Party's Services, to the fullest extent permitted by law, Contracting Party shall indemnify and hold harmless City and any and all of its officials, employees, and agents ("Indemnified Parties") from and against any and all losses, liabilities of every kind, nature, and description, damages, injury (including, without limitation, injury to or death of an employee of Contracting Party or of any subcontractor), costs and expenses, including, without limitation, incidental and consequential damages, court costs, reimbursement of attorneys' fees, litigation expenses, and fees of expert consultants or expert witnesses incurred in connection therewith and costs of investigation, to the extent same are caused by any negligent or wrongful act, error or omission of Contracting Party, its officers, agents, employees or subcontractors (or any entity or individual that Contracting Party shall bear the legal liability thereof) in the performance of professional services under this agreement. With respect to the design of public improvements, the Contracting Party shall not be liable for any injuries or property damage resulting from the reuse of the design at a location other than that specified in Exhibit A without the written consent of the Contracting Party. 3. Design Professional Defined. As used in this Section F.1(d), the term "design professional" shall be limited to licensed architects, registered professional engineers, licensed professional land surveyors and landscape architects, all as defined under current law, and as may be amended from time to time by Civil Code § 2782.8. F.2 Obligation to Secure Indemnification Provisions. Contracting Party agrees to obtain executed indemnity agreements with provisions identical to those set forth herein this Exhibit F, as applicable to the Contracting Party, from each and every subcontractor or any other person or entity involved by, for, with or on behalf of Contracting Party in the performance of this Agreement. In the event Contracting Party fails to obtain such indemnity obligations from others as required herein, Contracting Party agrees to be fully responsible according to the terms of this Exhibit. Failure of City to monitor compliance with these requirements imposes no additional obligations on City and will in no way act as a waiver of any rights hereunder. This obligation to indemnify and defend City as set forth in this Agreement are binding on the successors, assigns or heirs of Contracting Party and shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Exhibit F Page 2 of 2 777 taQa�fra I that ATTACHMENT 2 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Must be executed by proposer and submitted with the proposal (name) hereby acknowledge and confirm (name of company) has reviewed the City's indemnification and minimum insurance requirements as listed in Exhibits E and F of the City's Agreement for Contract Services (Attachment 1); and declare that insurance certificates and endorsements verifying compliance will be provided if an agreement is awarded. lam (Title) of (Company) Commercial General Liability (at least as broad as ISO CG 0001) $1,000,000 (per occurrence); $2,000,000 (general aggregate) Must include the following endorsements: General Liability Additional Insured General Liability Primary and Noncontributory Commercial Auto Liability (at least as broad as ISO CA 0001) $1,000,000 (per accident) Personal Auto Declaration Page if applicable Errors and Omissions Liability $1,000,000 (per claim and aggregate) Worker's Compensation (per statutory requirements) Must include the following endorsements: Worker's Compensation Waiver of Subrogation Worker's Compensation Declaration of Sole Proprietor if applicable Page 1 of 1 778 ATTACHMENT 3 NON -COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT FORM Must be executed by proposer and submitted with the proposal (name) hereby declare as follows: I am of , (Title) (Company) the party making the foregoing proposal, that the proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the proposer has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other proposer to put in a false or sham proposal, and has not directly or indirectly colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal, or that anyone shall refrain from proposing; that the proposer has not in any manner, directly or indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price of the proposer or any other proposer, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the proposal price, or of that of any other proposer, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the agreement of anyone interested in the proposed agreement; that all statements contained in the proposal are true; and, further, that the proposer has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative hereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company, association, organization, proposal depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham proposal. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Proposer Signature: Proposer Name: Proposer Title: Company Name: Address: Page 1 of 1 779 taQa�fra ATTACHMENT 4 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF ADDENDA Must be executed by proposer and submitted with the proposal; If no addenda has been issued, mark "N/A" under Addendum No. indicating Not Applicable and sign ADDENDUM NO. I SIGNATURE INDICATING RECEIPT Page 1 of 1 780 VISTA SANTA ROSA AVENUE 32 I N DIO tivE COACHELLA w W m 0 z �1 LA=gUMTA AIRPORT BLVD LA QUINTA SOI k z z O O i t 62ND AVE City of La Quinta Southern Sphere of Influence (S0h Page 1 of 1 781 Supplemental Items to Consider for Appeal 2025-0001: Overall theme of Basis for Appeal and request for City Council to revoke or modify the approval of TTM2025-0001, SDP2025-0001, and SDP2025-0002 related to the Club at Coral Mountain development 1) The approval of TTM2025-0001, SDP2025-0001, and SDP2025-0002 by the planning commission does not adequately protect the geological, archaeological, historical and recreational components of Coral Mountain and its surrounding areas. These are key assets within City limits, but of local and regional importance, decisions of this magnitude on this key property are far reaching. City should verify agreements with CVWD, IID, Tribes, County of Riverside, and these agreements should be made public. Input from surrounding stakeholders should be considered and disclosed. The proposed project not does not protect the rights of the public to access and utilize the recreational and historical components of the Coral Mountain area. Prior approvals did not adequately identify or discuss the long term strategy for management of these shared assets. 2)The approvalTTM2025-0001, SDP2025-0001, and SDP2025-0002 bythe planning commission does not adequately protect the interests of the residents of La Quinta with respect to: • Health and safety risks created by the construction; • Longterm health and safety risks during development operations; • Traffic and circulation; • Ongoing financial obligations; • Infrastructure obligations; • Increases in utility rates; • Water security; • Making steps toward becoming a sustainable community Attachments Note that my intention was that attachments were not required because the background and backup for the Appeal are included the record of the Public Hearing ittps://www.laquintaca.gov/Home/Components/Calendar/Event/16295/109?togg le=allpast , which includes the meeting recording, the TTM and development plans, staff report, references to all the background documents (EIR, development agreement and specific plan amendment, https://www.laquintaca.gov/our-city/city-departments/design- :A and-development/planning-division/planning-projects/club-at-coral-mountain ), public comments, and my written comments with references to earlier public comments in both planning and city council since May 21 (these were in open comment periods the hearing on Oct. 28 was first time this project was on an Agenda). There is also a written public comment from me on this matter at the Nov. 4 CC meeting that request an appeal or'call up' from City Council. This appeal references any and all documents created or referred to by the developer or the City in reference to the proposed development that is part of their record. I will try to supplement this with uploads to the HUB for this appeal 2015-0001 with other relevant documents and communications on this matter in the brief timeline allowed for preparation of this appeal. Field Visit Request A field visit with the applicant and any of the stakeholders would really help clarify some of the issues mentioned and assist in preparation for a hearing on the matter. This would assist perhaps to resolve conflicts in advance and/or and answer questions on what is planned. As part of the hearing process I request a site visit with all parties present. Table of Referenced Decisions -References in my statements to previous approvals, include the meeting dates and items considered for some of the decisions on this project. Because of inadequate review of previous agreements, comments, changes now requires higher level of scrutiny on the implementation of the plan. Table provided for reference, it is not complete. Date Project considered Items Body A/D March 5, 2024 Club at Coral Mt Environmental City Council Approved Assessment 2019-0010, General Plan Amendment 2023-1000, Zone Change 2023- 1000, Specific plan Amendment 2023-003 (SP2003-067, Amendment V), TTM 2023-0005, Development Agreement 2023- 1000 783 Jan 23, 2024 Club at Coral Mt Environmental Planning Approved Assessment Commission 2019-0010, General Plan Amendment 2023-1000, Zone Change 2023- 1000, Specific plan Amendment 2023-003 (SP2003-067, Amendment V), TTM 2023-0005, Development Agreement 2023- 1000 September21, Wave ADOPT Denial 2022 RESOLUTIONS TO CERTIFY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 2019-0010 AN D APPROVE SPECIFIC PLAN 2019-0003 (AMENDMENT V TO ANDALUSIA SPECIFIC PLAN), GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 2019- 0002, ZONE CHANGE 2019- 0004, SPECIFIC PLAN 2020-0002, AND TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2019-0005; INTRODUCE FOR FIRST READING ORDINANCES APPROVING ZONECHANGE 2019-0004 AND 784 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2021-0002; CEQA: CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (SCH #2021020310); LOCATION: SOUTH OF AVENUE 58, NORTH OF AVENUE 60, AND EAST AND WEST OF MADISON STREET The following comments supplement the comments in the original appeal document. A. Procedural and Due Process Concerns As clarification for statement in appeal regarding public comments. I was very appreciative of the comments being read, that was not expected, and I was grateful for that neighbor. My objection is that despite having received evidence to the contrary of staff findings in my and others written and oral comments, the comments of others at the public hearing (and from me to both Planning Commission and Council since May), no discussion acknowledgement, appeasement or refutation was offered to many of the issues presented. Additional procedural concern: The number of complex items considered in one public hearing process is overwhelming and does not allow for adequate review and understanding of each item. One Planning Commissionor was absent from hearing B. Inconsistency with General Plan and Zoning Requirements • The discussion at the Planning commission approval on Oct 28 did not provide any enlightenment on the details of the project that were left open-ended in the approved specific plan, EIR and development agreement. 785 • Please show consistency with the development agreement, and any changes to the development that were considered as part of this review. • Does this project reflected in TTM and development plans still reflect the intent of the Andalusia Specific Plan (and General Plan)? Or is this more of a resort (short term occupancy) setting? • Presentation by Applicant regarding the Club at Coral Mountain Plan is incomplete no specifics are given what this development will look like or how it will be used. There were claims in hearing regarding club members' use of golf course for other recreation activities, no mention of the recreational lake except through public comment, only after the vote Commissioner Nieto told applicant there was confusion around the overall picture of the project. There was significant uncertainty on how the development will operate. Neither the presentation and discussion at 28 Oct. hearing, nor the previous meetings provide any clarity of the intent of this development. As of 18 Nov. 2025 Applicant Meriwether has not changed their website for this project to show new development concept with golf course, recreational lake, and many fewer residences. The website includes one picture of Wave imprinted on Coral Mountain and various generic images of people playing yard games, golfing at sunrise(set),and a drawing of racket courts. To date, Applicant has not shown the specific development concept for this residential golf course plan. Because none of this was determined in previous stages, it should be demanded prior to accepting the TTM and development plans. 786 https://meriwetherco.com/meriwether-portfolio/coral-mountain/ Qp� MO(i/vr G0CM�Z 2 Pmpwty Detoft type. eefon reeydc+,loi wanly !fan stabw: C W, WK /tgvct En9,,9. Nt - spohro -Ihif ..1—ordinary p/ece f land and this Be" ore "Lwmq a and YYe we enfred to esp/ore are posslbYW,s of what Comr hfi—nia/n wftt became." Coral Mountain La Quints, CA Coal Ieo W ltn is a new a apI—h , u —on ar.eiuome.¢ Focused on demond bran efperet,tal acf oe, orld engaged pestyie tacated -n to (ARAM C1 n me eagem quadrant of Ile Coachella V[1sy. Coral r.,ountmn a a 400-acre laid pacts o[qu,red try tsenr.etner ConpanieS in mrd-2019 Inc flits orlt d Inc loll ramainng la,ge:and pacelf ;n e1v C oon,esn Ja I,eY With 0— at Ine—eldi,lry Iona Rafe fs,xandn rant!, lne fee obun Card Wunlon - a name dvrkvd from an ariant seobed and rmA;ng low-i;iea frla6hWu and vltlble crone ,,h" twno on the property Owebpmwe pare la tro property �nc.ude o p,�Yae rewere�d com v-"tY. anchored oy a David htctoy K40 deegr ed 900 coves. Myond gon. aw club at Cad tfo,eltae, we teowry cutting @age "lelem alb i slmte wwmbs% soda ptogrammirp nd tooqu@t worts agudva oca Io volt recreoton aeaL https://meriwetherco.com/about-us/ Our real estate developments seek to marry intelligent planning and design with unique amenities centered around outdoor activities, wellness and shared communities. Ol1R AMENITIES OUR PRODUCTS Value statements from the applicant website indicates reverence forth e natural environment and matching a development to its surroundings. This matches La Quinta's value statements, but do not seem to be mimicked through the Club at Coral Mt. Plan. It should also be noted that Meriwether focus is on "hospitality" assets. 787 • Taxes -heard that our property taxes and those of this development are wholly given to Riverside County for some years due a Bond agreement after annexation of this area of La Quinta (extension S and E from original boundaries). I have not had time to figure out when this happened or what exactly was annexed, City was Incorporated in 1982-coral Mt was not part of original City. Given this, shouldn't the correct lead agency for the CEQA analysis be Riverside County, or at least they should have been a consulted agency with review rights? This seems especially true given the complexity and size of the project. C. Impacts to Cultural, Archaeological, and Tribal Resources • Alignment of western boundary fence it is way too close to the mountain and it's special features and does not allow for public access through and around that is not impacting those features. Further, the fence (and trail) will be on an unstable slope that will require constant maintenance, increasing traffic and work required around sensitive features • Trail alignment is too close to golf hole 14 which would put trail users at risk. • Hole is to tee off into a toe of the mountain and will be frequently impacted by golf balls in the area that is marked as an ESA • Coral Mountain is a sacred well known landmark that contains the coolest features left of our archaeological and natural history. Impacts to the identified as ESA on the private property impact the whole thing. • The proposed trail is not wide enough, not in the right spot and they have not provided an easement or shown the agreements with CVWD and BOR that a public trail will continue to be allowed through this area. • Rock Art Plan is not yet available -Tribal statement required • Agricultural tiles and drainage system from past uses will be destroyed- a historic artifact speaking to the agricultural history of the Valley D. Environmental, Recreational, and Visual Resource Impacts • Fence alignment on the west side, which is claimed to be mandated by the `forest service', but involves several stakeholders. In the approved documents the alignment of the fence (and trail) was left open. But nothing has changed from the proposed alignment, nor any discussion presented on the options considered. • No letters of support or comments on the fence plan were solicited or provided from the stakeholder agencies and or groups requesting the fence. • The proposed trail is not wide enough, not in the right spot and they have not provided an easement 788 • Public Easement to be recorded has not been identified in TTM • CVWD and BOR have not provided comments regarding this plan, though the plan prosed implies that there is a plan for continued use of this area as a public trail. • No comments provided from Desert Recreation District F. Site -Specific Impacts Based on applicant statement the phasing sequence may change based on market conditions — how does this guarantee orderly development as noted in staff findings? Lake- Amount of material to be moved, source of water, when would be in construction schedule, justification as needed for success of development The fence alignment (and trail) as shown will be on an unstable slope that will require constant maintenance, increasing traffic and work required impacting community OW8111040169 G. Cumulative and Regional Impacts • There are at least three projects consisting of hundreds of acres and decades long construction timelines for housing/lodging/golf projects planned to start in in next 1-2 years in City Limits. Plus a 111 redesign project (our main commercial corridor) How is the city planning to manage these projects? Who will be managing the implementation of complex mitigation plans, construction oversight, permits, infrastructure requirements, site monitoring, etc? Payment of fees by developers is not sufficient to cover additional workload required. Probability of outside personnel or developer personnel unfamiliar with the projects engaged and put into a position of enforcement/approval recommendations with limited knowledge of the each of project's complex agreements and schedules. Inability to process the smaller projects with any expediency and rushed or inaccurate findings for the larger projects. • Project of this size must consider its impacts beyond the project boundary, changes to the use and direction on this site is directly impacting more and more neighbors. 789 How many developments surround Coral Mountain on 58th, Madison and 60th? Coral Mountain by Alta Verde Santa Rosa Trails Desert — Sotheby's International Realty Cantera at Coral Mountain Andalusia Santerra Lisa Castro — private residence Puerta Azul AE Coral Mountain at PGA West Palo Verde Toll Brothers Stone Creek The Quarry Trilogy Lions Gate Guillermo Cassilas — private residence PGA West Legends Residential Figure 1: Most of these are newer developments, and this is an incomplete list. This was found in Public comments opposed to this development as evidence to further assess the impacts for traffic, noise, light and air pollution prior to approval. This was not discussed in prior approvals for this project. • The boundaries and access points to our public lands and open spaces have been consistently cut off along the boundary with the mountains to the west. This project further restricts access and blocks or destroys natural wildlife corridors connecting the mountains to the valley below. The size of this development and as one of the last large parcels with mountain adjacency, the cumulative impacts to our open space, recreational opportunities and access must be considered. • TTM and Development plan review should have included comments from affected agencies at a minimum. These are not present in the Final EIR that was approved by City Council in March 2024 (EIR considering Alternative 2 (the Andalusia residential golf course entitlements). The EIR was not recirculated for reconsideration of Alternative 2 and statements in staff report from this meeting, provided as to why not recirculated in staff report are weak). The same EIR for the new plan for golf course residential at the site was certified in same meeting with a General Plan Amendment, a Zone Change, A Tentative Tract Map, and the Development Agreement). The previous action on the Project was in September 2022 when the 'Preferred Alternative' under the EIR was denied. (This was the Wave Project that had a separate Specific Plan from the Andalusia project. At that meeting the City Council voted against: Wave 790 Development Agreement, the Wave Tract Map and the Wave Specific Plan, the EIR was not acted upon at that meeting in Sept 2022) 1 am coming to understand that the City did not adequately analyze this Project for CEQA, and may be unqualified as lead agency. • Critical Water Infrastructure Impacted by this development. At a minimum comments letters of support should be presented from CVWD, Bureau of Reclamation and County of Riverside: o Lake Cahuilla Reservoir o Canal o Buried water Pipeline and related above ground water conveyance structures (pipeline headed east to for agriculture, golf courses, and communities) o Groundwater replenishment facility adjacency • Critical Stormwater infrastructure o Levees on S and W of project-built—1930s? owned by BOR maintained by CVWD-these were built to protect us from stormwater events (Hurricane Hilary was in 2023) where there is high potential for large amounts of water, sediment (clay, sand, gravel, up to large boulders depending on size of storm) o Current use as walking path/biking/horseback riding —This is current use but there needs to be an agreement with CVWD/BOR that the multi -use trail will be continued to be allowed because there will be a lot of people looking for this amenity o Access for maintenance, emergency access, risks to life and property in case of failure • Circulation o Concerns at Avenue 60 side of development were discussed but not resolved in hearing. Promises that this is going to get figured out, or residents will live with it, but no steps toward planning have been made public 0 58th dead ends to west into at Quarry or Park. There will be increased traffic from this development and increased use of Lake Cahuilla Veterans Regional Park. Traffic consideration was not given to Avenue 58 was not analyzed, but increased population and commercial corner will increase traffic. There is only one way out in this flood prone area 791 • Complex web of private and public interests/landholders, rights of way not fully described or considered in TTM and plans submitted • Cost/Risk and Benefit analysis was not presented for this development by the applicant or the City. i.e. what to do with all these new residents and visitors? Parks and open space is a big draw that is not prioritized in this development. 792 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain, La Quinta, Riverside County, California By Daniel F. McCarthy and Leslie J. Mouriquand Abstract This report considers three petroglyph sites, CA-RIV-193, CA- RIV-1715, and CA-RIV-6404, which are located at Coral Moun- tain along the eastern slope of the Santa Rosa Mountains in the Coachella Valley, Riverside County, California. The petroglyphs were placed on tufa-coated boulders along the shoreline of Ancient Lake Cahuilla. Twenty-six panels of prehistoric petroglyphs were documented for the three sites along with historic graffiti, including three panels of Japanese kanji ideoglyphs. Introduction Coral Mountain is in the central -western portion of the Coachella Valley near La Quinta, Riverside County, California. Three petroglyphs sites, CA- RIV-193, CA-RIV-1715, and CA-RIV-6404, are lo- cated along the southeastern and northeastern sides of Coral Mountain (Figure 1). At each site, petro- glyphs have been carved into the tufa-coated boul- ders along the ancient shoreline of Lake Cahuilla. Two of the three sites and much of the surrounding area have been designated as part of a regional park administered by the Coachella Valley Recreation and Parks District and will be open to the public in the near future (McCarthy and Mouriquand 2003). Plans are in preparation for providing interpretative trails and for disseminating information about the Cahuilla Indians who have resided in the area for hundreds of years. This study provides information on a number of petroglyph boulders at RIV-193, RIV-1715 and RIV-6404 and attempts to place the petroglyphs in temporal and cultural contexts. Sections are included on documentation procedures, descriptions, and interpretations of the identified rock art. A baseline set of data will allow the rock art to be monitored for short-term and long-term impacts. Rock art sites are frequently recorded but often without providing much detailed information on the quantity and quality of the images. Rock art documen- tation can be completed in phases (McCarthy 1994), and simply recording the presence of rock art might be considered the first phase. Full documentation requires that the rock art be mapped in relationship to other as- sociated artifacts and features and that it be described in detail which includes photographs and, most impor- tantly, scaled drawings of each rock/panel. The study (McCarthy and Mouriquand 2003) on which this paper is based included identification and mapping of all boulders and petroglyph panels in rela- tion to other identified cultural features. An annotated photographic inventory, using digital technology, was provided for all panels, element(s) and their contexts within the site. Detailed, scaled drawings of all rock art panels were also produced. In addition, historic graffiti was mapped and photographed to serve as a baseline of information on current site conditions. This paper summarizes all fieldwork procedures and observations. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly, Volume 41, Number 4 793 28 The goal of rock art documentation is threefold. The first goal is to establish a permanent record of all images and their current condition. This record will add significantly to the inventory of images known for the region. Second, this record will allow comparative studies of images and their distribu- tion and further refinement in style definition and distribution. This detailed documentation will serve as both a permanent record and as an aid in monitor- ing deterioration from natural or human agents over time. Third, complete recording provides informa- tion to guide protection, conservation, and interpre- tative efforts. An Appendix contains scaled drawings. Researchers in- terested in reviewing the entire study including a com- plete photographic inventory and updated site records should consult McCarthy and Mouriquand (2003). t .,A Pass J « 1 McCarthy and Mouriquand Documentation Procedures The primary technique used to record the petroglyphs (including historic graffiti) was photography. The end goal, however, was to prepare accurate, scaled draw- ings that would be the basis of an inventory or catalog of images. Photographic documentation confirms the state of preservation, current condition, and setting of the rock art. It helps record weathering of the rock surface and the presence or absence or vandalism. Photographs were taken and placed in a sequence first to document the geographic setting of the site. Second, closer views were taken to record each rock, panel, and image. Photography by itself seldom suf- fices as detailed documentation of the rock art images even in the best of circumstances (McCarthy 1989:4, 1990, 1995; Loubser 1997). Many of the petroglyphs at Coral Mountain are difficult to photograph due to >Coaobo w .ram' +' D eh E1' "'A', 1/ `4 ls'�ltl It ♦ ./�I Coral Mountain ? r jI ■ Figure 1. Location of Coral Mountain, Riverside County, indicated by star symbol. Other rock art sites within the area are indicated by a solid square (■). Adapted from the USGS State of California map, Scale 1:1,000,000. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 794 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain differences in surface color, weathering, and lack of contrast between the rock surface color and the image itself. All areas displaying petroglyph images were committed to scaled drawings. Each panel was photographed using a digital camera. Scaled drawings were produced in one of two ways, either from photographs or from tracings. Areas of exfoliation and vandalism (painting, carving, or scratching of names, dates, or other symbols) were noted on the drawings. Panels were designated as containing either petroglyphs or historic graffiti. In many instances rock art covers more than one face or facet of the same rock. Each boulder or rock surface was identified as a panel of that one rock. A special form was used to record the number of surfaces con- taining rock art. Using this information, it was possi- ble to quantify the boulders containing rock art, count the number of panels, and provide the total number of images present at a site. These data can be used for quantitative comparisons with rock art at other sites. Additional information included panel designation (in cases of more than one panel per boulder), the direc- tion of a panel's face, degree of surface inclination, type of rock, panel size, area of decoration, occur- rences of superimposition, and condition of panel. An initial visit was made to the site on January 25, 2003, with most of the fieldwork completed on week- ends between February and April of 2003. Low level aerial photographs were taken to provide a geographic context for the sites and as an aid in mapping the loca- tions of milling and rock art features. Subsequent to locating the glyph -bearing boulders, each rock/panel was mapped and plotted on an aerial photograph. Observations were made concerning the current condition of each panel, and these were contrasted with earlier descriptions and sketches when available Field notes were incorporated into the descriptions and into an updated site record form focusing on the rock art. 29 Efforts to locate early photographs or sketches through archival research were not fruitful. The principal au- thor had a set of photos taken in 1987 that were useful for comparison. A complete set of photographs was taken to document the setting, boulder context, panel, and images of the rock art. Rock Art Styles Before describing the petroglyphs at Coral Mountain, a brief overview of rock art styles in the region is pre- sented to provide context. Few rock art studies were done in southern California prior to 1970. With the relatively few sites investigated, petroglyph and picto- graph styles were poorly described, and interpretations were based on limited ethnographic data and limited knowledge of designs and their distribution (Steward 1929; Fenenga 1949; True 1954; Heizer and Baumhoff 1962; Heizer and Clewlow 1973). Hedges (1970, 1973, 1979, 1989) has taken the lead in analyzing many of the sites in southern California and northern Baja California and has identified ad- ditional styles of rock art for the region. In the past rock art style had been defined on the basis of method of execution (cf., Heizer and Baumhoff 1962; Heizer and Clewlow 1973) and the presence or absence of particular designs. In some areas, certain styles are represented in both petroglyph and pictograph form, where one method of execution is much less abun- dant. Generally, attempts at a classification scheme or nomenclature of individual design elements have not been successful, as there appears to be some overlap in geographic, spatial, and temporal distributions. Recognized styles of rock art in southern California are summarized based on a classification by Whitley (2000) (Table 1 and Figure 2). Whitley (2000) has developed a classification of rock art for much of California based on function. He has argued that nearly all rock art is the product of shamanism, in which shamans are seeking power PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 795 30 Table 1. Concordance of Rock Art Classification Systems for Southern California. McCarthy and Mouriquand Whitley Nomenclature (2000) Conventional Styles References California Tradition Painted Styles South -Central Painted Variant" Santa Barbara Style" Heizer and Clewlow (1973) Peninsular Range Representational Hedges (1973) rue 5 -Hedges (1970, 1973,7 ; Southwestern Painted Variant' San Luis Rey Style" McCarthy (1991); Freers (1998); Heizer and Clewlow 1973) Rancho Bernardo Style Hedges (1973, 1989); McCarthy (1991) Petroglyph Styles Heizer and Clewlow (1973) California Engraved Variant Western Archaic Style Hedges (1982); McCarthy (1993) Riverside Maze Hedges (1973); McCarthy (1989); Freers (1998) Far Western Pit -and -Groove Tradition Pit -and -Groove Heizer and Baumhoff (1962); Payen (1966); Hedges (1973); Minor (1975) Northern Pit -and -Groove Variant Pit -and -Groove Heizer and Baumhoff (1962); Payen (1966); Hedges (1973); Minor (1975) Southern Cupule Variant Cupule Hedges (1973); Minor (1975); Smith and Lerch (1984); McCarthy (1989) "Style well outside the study area 6m Ayedu Ca C------ t n 0 D 60 STYLE 1 ® San Luis Rey ® Rancho Bernardo g x , I t Rha . CA. 1 ARIZONA I I,yrcd�l ca I Y SONORA ~` ® Western Archaic and Other Riverside Maze Peninsular Range Representational l � I * Coral Nbuntain PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) Figure 2. Rock art styles in Southern California. Cupule petroglyphs are found through- out the region. Adapted from Hedges (1973) and McCarthy (1978). 796 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain through contacting the other world(s) to tap into knowledge and power. The production of rock art imagery is part of that process. Whitley refers to his classification as the "California Tradition" and maintains that rock art is associated with shamanic vision quests serving as portals into supernatural worlds. He has argued that the California ethno- graphic record does not support stylistic differences based on culture or time period of manufacture. Yet, there is greater diversity in the styles of rock art within California than previously recognized. These styles span across the landscape (cultural/ tribal boundaries recognized today) as well as over long periods of time. The production of rock art likely served several functions within the same culture at the same time. The purposes behind identifying variations in sub- ject matter and methods of execution in rock art has often been to infer differences in age, cultural affilia- tions, functions, and meanings. Even where specific functions of the rock art are unknown, recognizable patterns allow other kinds of interpretations (i.e., the who, where, and when). Other researchers less clear about the meanings and functions of rock art have attempted to classify rock art by method of execu- tion and subject matter. For that purpose, the regional rock art has been fitted into styles; these are briefly described here as they may relate to the Coral Moun- tain region. Only petroglyphs were identified at Coral Mountain; no rock paintings were observed. Styles currently in use in the region of the study area are briefly described below. Desert Archaic Style The Desert Archaic style is named in part for the general time frame in which the rock art was produced. This style is not well defined; how- ever, it represents a long tradition of petroglyph manufacture throughout the Desert West. Previous investigators have further divided Desert Archaic r« petroglyphs by design, referring to Great Basin Abstract (curvilinear and rectilinear) and Represen- tational styles (Heizer and Baumhoff 1962; Heizer and Clewlow 1973). Due to limited sampling and misconceptions over image distribution, defini- tions of these styles are now considered outdated (Hedges 1982). Petroglyph images in the Desert Archaic style have a far wider distribution than the Great Basin and overlap cultural as well as temporal boundaries (McCarthy 1993). While the age of Desert Archaic petroglyph produc- tion is still in question, most researchers agree that the style is many thousands of years old. No glyphs within the project appear to represent this style. Pit-and-Groove/Cupule Style This style was named largely on evidence from one site in Nevada (Baumhoff et al. 1958). In areas of California and the Great Basin, the Pit -and -Groove style consists of small pits and worn grooved marks found together on the same rock surface. In the southern California region, the pits, or cupules as they are commonly called, are more typically found by themselves without grooves (Hedges 1973:21). The number of known cupule boulder sites has increased from approximately 50 known throughout the state in the early 1950s (Heizer 1953) to several hundred sites now known statewide. Often, cupules are associ- ated with other petroglyphs and pictographs, but they rarely appear on the same panel. Minor (1975:Figure 3) illustrated the distribution of the style in south- ern California, noting that only nine of the 53 Pit - and -Groove style sites recorded at the time actually had grooves. Five of these sites were reported from western Riverside County. Smith and Lerch (1984) noted more than 50 cupule sites in San Bernardino County. A later study of archaeological site records for Riverside County on file at the Eastern Information Center noted 63 cupule sites and 10 pit -and -groove sites (McCarthy 1992). PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 797 KA As the name implies, this petroglyph style has pits associated with worn or polished grooves. Because the majority of pit -and -groove sites in southern California do not contain "grooves," a separate "Cupule" style is designated here. The definition used to describe cupules considers their size as well as their placement on a rock surface and association with other features, particularly milling features. Throughout south- ern California, cupules are usually small, shallow, polished depressions on a vertical surface (McCarthy 1989). Similar features (small, mini -mortar -like) situ- ated on a horizontal rock surface and associated with bedrock milling features are likely related to plant or animal food processing, and if so, they would not be considered as rock art. Smith and Lerch (1984) noted similarities between the of Pit -and -Groove sites in southern California and those described by Payen (1966) for the southern Si- erra Nevada. Smith and Lerch (1984:3-5) and Payen (1966) recognized the following categories of cu- pules: simple cupules, cupules and grooves, cupules with grooves and vulviforms, painted cupules, and cupules on portable stones. In general, cupules range in diameter from 20 min to 80 min and from 2 min to 60 min in depth. The grooved elements may have been pecked out and then abraded to form a smooth, polished surface. They are usually worn less than two cm deep into the rock. Grooved designs in the southern California region are: (1) always associated with cupules on the same panel; (2) often single short lines; (3) some- times connecting two or more cupules; or (4) some- times in a horseshoe -shaped, or vulva -shaped, form; (5) more frequently on a vertical surface or surface at such an angle that would preclude food preparation (grinding/milling). The best ethnographic accounts of these styles are from northern California. The Shasta Indians (Heizer 1953) manufactured cupules for the purpose PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand of controlling the weather where swollen rivers allowed salmon to travel upriver to spawn. Fre- quently, cupules are located at the favored fishing spots. Pomo women produced cupules to promote conception (Loeb 1926). Ethnographic information for the Dieguefio (DuBois 1908b:231-232) suggests the possible use of pitted boulders in controlling the weather. Several ethnographic accounts from southern California hint at their use in initiation rites and as possible boundary markers (Minor 1975:15- 17; see also True and Baumhoff 1981). Among the Cocopah, Kelly (1977:127) referenced the possible use of cupule rocks in association with the land of the dead. Riverside Maze Style Several carved maze -type designs are known in Riverside, San Bernardino, Orange, San Diego, and northwestern Imperial counties (see Hedges 1973:19- 20). Of these, perhaps the best known example is the Hemet Maze Stone, CA-RIV-20 (Smith and Turner 1975; Schroth and McCarthy 1987). This maze -like design and several others located within a 75 mile radius of RIV-20 comprise the core area for the River- side Maze petroglyph style. Coral Mountain is on the edge of that radius. Other maze -like designs occur at Travertine Rock located 15 km to the south of Coral Mountain. This style and the Rancho Bernardo style overlap somewhat in distribution in northern San Diego County and the western half of Riverside County, including the Coachella Valley and the northern Penin- sular Ranges. They share similar design elements and are often separated only by method of execution (i.e., petroglyph versus pictograph). There are several examples of pecked mazes with added paint inside the lines (cf., CA-RIV-19 and CA-RIV-464) (McCarthy 1989). More examples of this combination may have existed, but weathering 798 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain and age have undoubtedly affected the recognition of pecked and painted maze sites. Like the Rancho Ber- nardo style, little is known of the age, meaning, and cultural affiliation of the Riverside Maize style. How- ever, at least two sites, including Coral Mountain and Travertine Point, where mazes occur, are tentatively dated to ca. 450-500 years BP (McCarthy 1981). As a result of continued research, it is now recognized that many of the petroglyph maze panels are located in the historically known core area of the Cahuilla Indians (McDonald et al. 1996). Site Descriptions Coral Mountain consists of a granitic rock exposure rising 465 feet from its base at sea level. The traver- tine deposit, or tufa, at Coral Mountain is a biogenic calcium carbonate with the chemical formula of CaCO3. Biogenic means that it was created or initiated by a living organism. It is thought that green or blue- green algae provided the mechanism that precipitated this tufa (McCarthy 1981; Blodgett 2003). Tufa coats the rocks below the old high water shore line of Lake Cahuilla.There are three petroglyph sites located along the eastern base of Coral Mountain: RIV-193, RIV-1715, and RIV-6404. All three sites are within a one kilometer stretch between the southeastern and northeastern base of Coral Mountain (Figures 3 and 4). Scaled drawings of the rock art at these sites are in the Appendix. Several studies have been conducted at Coral Mountain and surrounding areas (Scientific Re- source Surveys, Inc. 1979; Westec Services, Inc. 1987; Love et al. 1998; Love et al. 2000; Drover and Smith 2002). The many sites recorded have been characterized as temporary occupations, ceramic scatters, or areas likely associated with gathering. These sites date after the last high water lake stand of Lake Cahuilla which occurred within the last 500 years. 33 CA-RIV-193 Site RIV-193 is at the southeastern most extent of Coral Mountain and consists of six petroglyph panels, one bedrock metate, and a handfull of ceramics. All the petroglyphs are carved into the relatively soft tufa covering the boulders at the base of the mountain. The depth of the tufa varies, but the range at this site is from several millimeters to over 60 cm (Figure 5). The ceramics include at least one rim and a dozen body sherds, all brownware. The site contains no mid - den, and the few observed ceramic artifacts are rest- ing on exposed lake bed sediments. Sand and gravels occur at the very base of the rock exposure and are the result of wind action or erosion of the rock out- crop. Colluvium does not cover the surrounding lake bed deposits because the site is on the leeward side of Coral Mountain, which prevents the buildup of such deposits. The site measures approximately 90 m by 40 m (Figures 6 and 7). Approximately 221 rock surfaces contain graffiti and other vandalism. This graffiti includes names, dates, or initials carved into the tufa. Only one panel has spray paint. Most of the petroglyph panels have some form of graffiti on them, but usually the graffiti is to the side of the petroglyphs and does not mask the images themselves. CA-RIV-1715 Site RIV-1715, at the northeast end of Coral Moun- tain, includes 14 petroglyph panels, 36 bedrock mortars, and three bedrock metates. Several metate fragments, manos, and over 150 ceramic sherds occur on the surface. The site is unique in that all of the mor- tars were formed in the tufa that presents a thick coat over most of the exposed bedrock surfaces (Figure 8). Many of the mortars are small and shallow (less than 8 cm in depth); several others are under 15 cm in width with depths reaching 30 cm. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) O 34 Figure 3. General aerial view looking south at Coral Mountain with RIV-193 located to the far left and RIV-1 715 located at the near left. Figure 4. North end of Coral Mountain (and site RIV-1715) showing the "bath tub ring" of the old Lake Cahuilla shoreline. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain Small patches of mesquite, less than one half acre in size, occur nearby. Much of the Coachella Valley was covered with mesquite in earlier times, and mesquite pods were most likely processed in the mortars. These mortars are the only ones in the valley known to have been formed in tufa deposits. RIV-1715 is only the sec- ond site recorded in the valley where bedrock mortars occur. Bedrock boulders or exposures do not occur on the valley floor but are located along the western edge of the valley. Ethnographic literature states that wooden mortars were used to process mesquite (Strong 1929; Bean 1972; Bean and Saubel 1972). Graffiti occurs over many of the bedrock boulders at this site. Over 570 boulder surfaces (panels) of graffiti were counted. Graffiti includes scratched, carved, or incised names, dates, initials, and other images. Painted graffiti (spray or house paint) represents eight percent of the total graffiti. Many of the rocks have been used either as gun targets themselves or as backdrops for target shooting, resulting in many tufa surfaces being badly pock marked. 35 Surprisingly, few of the images determined to be prehis- toric have been directly damaged. Vandalism does occur on the same panel next to the aboriginal images either in the form of incised or painted graffiti or bullet holes. The site measures approximately 200 m by 300 m and is located along the base of the mountain (Figure 9). Detailed maps of these features are shown in Smith (2003). Current efforts to characterize the artifacts and features at RIV-1715 have identified many milling features in addition to the previously reported glyphs and ceramic scatters (Drover and Smith 2002; Smith 2003; Plymale-Schneeberger 2003; see McCarthy and Mouriquand 2003). After careful examination of the tufa covered bedrock and boulder surfaces, 14 panels of prehistoric rock art have been recorded. In addition to the larger parent (Rock 1), two other rocks along the base of the mountain were recorded that have petroglyphs. Rock 1 has 12 panels of petroglyphs on the various facets of the bedrock outcrop. The two individual boulders have one panel each. Figure 5. View of tufa deposits showing various thicknesses on the same rock. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 36 Site " I _# �'•-.•��� .>. .�..- �11L Hauck outcrop (Rock I) ^- Contour QBoulder Dirttrack •f Bedrock --fate � Creosote Scale PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) --� Rock art penal (number) \ Po— pole (d—) l -2.4 sell.-W gradti paned(com bar) • Shad McCarthy and Mouriquand Figure 6. Aerial view of RIV-193. Top of photo is west. Figure 7. Site sketch map of RIV-193. Top of drawing is north. :li Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain 37 CA-RIV-6064 This is a small site with three boulders with petro- glyphs and a handful of buffware ceramics (Figures 10 and 11). It is located about half way between sites RIV-193 and RIV-1715 along the base of Coral Mountain. RIV-6064 is similar to RIV-193 in that it is protected from alluvium washing in from the west so the site is below sea level, and the surround- ing soil is lake bed sediments. The three boulders account for a total of six panels. Images occurring here include circles, concentric circles, bisected circles, and possibly an anthropomorphic figure. Coral Mountain Rock Art Steward (1929:86) provided the earliest published reference to the Coral Mountain sites. He included a brief description provided by W. Egbert Schenck who mentioned petroglyphs along the old shoreline of Lake Cahuilla as occurring at "Coral Reef' located near the Rau Ranch. This ranch was an early homestead at the northwest corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street. Figure 8. Example of mortars in a tufa-coated boulder at site RIV-1715. Along the shoreline the boulders are covered with tufa, resembling coral in appearance. Steward, refer- ring to "the Coral Reef," writes: About 6-8 miles south and 4 miles west of Coachella near the Rau Ranch. A well-known landmark. Consists of an isolated ridge a few hundred feet long with the northeastern end exhibiting in striking form the old beach line of Lake Cahuilla. At this place the beach line is perhaps 75 feet above the valley floor with the western side of the Reef above the old water line. The "line" is the point where the granite has ceased to be en- crusted by the travertine deposits from the lake. Above the line the granite is clean; below the travertine varies from a trace to several inches in thickness, giving the rock somewhat the appear- ance of a coral formation. [Steward (1929:86] Later investigators (Stafford 1947; Shepard and Gearheart 1973) reported two petroglyph sites in the PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) I1 38 McCarthy and Mouriquand " � � i -.�� � + f� s : ,yfir' •f►7.4 7� �' � " f :L s • .' U m ak Figure 9. Aerial view of site RIV-1715 showing base of mountain where petroglyphs and milling features are located. Site bound- ary extends north (right) and east (below) from this view. vicinity, but insufficient data and poor site descriptions clouded the exact locations in an area that was rela- tively remote at the time. These sites were recorded as CA-RIV-37 and CA-RIV-193. Mr. Stafford reported RIV-37 as being at the mouth of Devils Canyon. He provided several drawings of petroglyphs but no exact locations. Eugene Shepard completed a site record for petroglyphs occurring in the same area, but again details in location were lacking. These accounts con- tributed data about the occurrence of petroglyphs, but information was vague regarding the number of glyph panels and associated cultural features. During a survey of adjacent property, Scientific Re- source Surveys, Inc. (1979) recorded site RIV-1715. Their report discusses a ceramic scatter along the base of Coral Mountain. McCarthy (1987) conducted a reconnaissance along the tufa covered boulders looking for rock art (Gallagos 1987). McCarthy visited the RIV-1715 area and determined that the glyphs occurring there may have been the same as PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) those reported at RIV-37. Access was limited to only a small portion of the tufa coated boulders along the north and eastern flank of Coral Mountain. Glyphs were found at two locations. Based on the then limited data and a few sketches of the rock art, these locations were assumed to match the earlier reports by Stafford and Shepard, and it was assumed that the abundance of graffiti masked or destroyed the previously reported images. The 1987 updates were completed to reflect more accurate locational infor- mation and better descriptions of the rock art. Graffiti and other vandalism were noted, and site sketch maps were provided for two locations of glyphs then identified as RIV-37 and RIV-193. Subsequent surveys by other investigators of the greater area provided observations of three areas with petroglyphs at Coral Mountain; these include RIV- 193, RIV-1715, and RIV-6404. RIV-37 is located 4 km southwest of Coral Mountain and will not be discussed further. 804 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain lb ►.'i ..r t _c �� •: � is t' CC' � ' IA► 4 Rock outcrop • Ceramic sherd _-_ Dirt road Log mesquite i 20 m r � ►t s, \ \\ Rock 3 /� ` 1 • if \, • Creosote . \ !� Rock 2 Rock 1 \\ �� mano 1 • 1 ~ I tamarisk \� Figure 10. The RIV-6404 area. Figure 11. RIV-6404 site map. 39 PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 805 40 Previous investigators had provided information and general locational data about the sites, but the rock art had not been subjected to formal documentation. Rocks (and panels) with petroglyphs were separated from panels with only graffiti. The vandalism was too extensive to map and record at the time. The petroglyph panels located at RIV-193 and RIV- 1715 are summarized with information including site, rock, and panel identification, panel size, and the num- ber of images in Table 2. No superimposition occurs on any of the panels. The petroglyphs were executed using two methods, pecking and incising. The designs represent clear images but are sometimes difficult to distinguish from vandalism or the very porous nature and erosion of the tufa surface. Designs range from 1 to 2 cm in width and depth. Tufa does not develop any patina or desert varnish. However, the surface develops a light gray to black discoloration generally caused by weathering or resulting from colonies of lichen or moss growth. One panel has several cupules associated with a long linear design. These cup -like depressions are different from other cupules identified throughout the region. Cupules are formed by first pecking out incipient holes. These holes are then enlarged by a grinding action to produce a polished, smooth surface. Rock 1, Panel 9 contains seven cups on a horizontal surface (Figures 12 and 13) located about four meters above the ground. These cups range in size from 10 to 80 mm in diameter and from 15 to 32 mm in depth. The rock art at Coral Mountain is unique both from the standpoint of design inventory as well as loca- tion. Rock art on tufa covered rocks is known only at three other locations along the shoreline of Lake Cahuilla. These include several sites at Fish Spring, Travertine Rock, and Fish Traps, all located within 20 km south of Coral Mountain. No detailed studies have taken place at these sites; thus, the images are not well documented. However, what is apparent is the unusual PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand location and association with the former shoreline. Steward (1929:85) observed that some images were made before the last high water in -filling because they appear masked by later tufa growth caused by subse- quent lake filling. This observation has been made by others investigators as well (Wilke and Wilke 1978; McCarthy 1981). The glyph designs at Coral Mountain generally consist of linear elements such as crosses and circles. These elements include single, parallel and wavy lines (see Appendix). There is only one rectilinear image at Coral Mountain. However, there are several very elaborate maze -like panels occurring at Traver- tine Rock (CA-IMP-75) located 20 km south of the project area (Figure 14). These images represent the southeastern extent of the Riverside Maze style. The rectilinear image at RIV-1715 (Rock 1 Panel 6) is reminiscent of this style and may relate to that style, although the interior pattern is not as elaborate as most other examples (Figures 15 and 16). Anthropo- morphs, rayed circles (sunbursts), diamonds, and other elements noted at other regional or Cahuilla sites are notably absent but do occur at a series of sites associ- ated with a trail leading from the valley to the uplands (Worth 2003). Preliminary data on known sites within the region are provided in Table 3. Rock Art Dating Given the context of the rock art at Coral Mountain, the petroglyphs were most likely produced after the last high-water lake stand. This would date the major- ity of the petroglyphs to sometime after ca. A.D. 1680. Early observers have noted the possibility that several of the Lake Cahuilla shoreline glyph panels may have been produced prior to the last high-water lake filling (McCarthy 1981). It appears that some panels have been filled in with tufa growth. Several panels at Coral Mountain may reflect this tufa growth including RIV- 1715, Rock 1, Panel 6 and Panel 7. The designs are located low to the current ground level and are within :1, Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain Table 2: Rock Art Attribute Data for Sites RIV-193 and RIV-1715. 41 Site Rock/Panel Panel Size (L x W cm) Number of Images Image RIV-193 1/1 90 x 70 2 linear RIV-193 1/2 35 x 30 1 rake -like design RIV-193 1/3 48 x 39 2 comb/rake-like RIV-193 1/4 60 x 50 1 bisected circle RIV-193 2/1 185 x 256 3 circular grids, vertical lines RIV-193 3/1 55 x 40 1 vertical wavy lines RIV-1715 1/1 36 x 42 2 circles RIV-1715 1/2 43 x 7 2 vertical lines RIV-1715 1/3 55 x 24.5 1 cross or anthropomorph (?) RIV-1715 1/4 42 x 52 3 vertical lines RIV-1715 1/5 45 x 55 4 vertical lines RIV-1715 1/6 113 x 130 1 rectangular grid (maze -like design) RIV-1715 1/7 39 x 39 1 nondescript RIV-1715 1/8 19 x 52 3 horizontal lines RIV-1715 1/9 155 x 60 8 wavey line, cupules RIV-1715 1/10 60.5 x 64 1 cross RIV-1715 1/11 46 x 5 1 vertical line RIV-1715 1/12 105 x 50 2 vertical line, abstract RIV-1715 2/1 83 x 95 4 meandering line, diamond chain (?) RIV-1715 3/1 51 x 3.5 1 vertical line RIV-6404 1/1 136 x 94 10 circles, concentric circles, and lines RIV-6404 2/1 65 x 65 1 concentric circles RIV-6404 3/1 112 x 100 4 circles RIV-6404 3/2 138 x 110 3 circle, bisected circle, other RIV-6404 3/3 90 x 65 2 lines, sectioned circle RIV-6404 3/4 62 x 35 1 human stick figure (?) Rock 1 is the bedrock or parent rock outcrop itself; other rocks are individual boulders separate from the bedrock exposure. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 42 Ilk y 1 , 1 " y Figure 12. Photo of RIV-1715, Rock 1, Panel 9. Panel is on a horizontal plane and approximately 4 meters above the ground. • 30 cm Figure 13. Drawing of RIV-1715, Rock 1, Panel 9 showing cupules with meandering line. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain two meters of each other. If manufactured prior to the last high lake stand, their age would only be a few hundred years older. Had they been older, they would have been inundated several times, and tufa growth would have completely filled in the petroglyphs to the point of obscuring them. Interpretation of the Native Rock Art We can gain some insight into why rock art was produced by studying the archaeological context and site infrastructure near the rock art. There has been a long tradition of creating petroglyphs and pictographs in southern California. Hundreds of rock art sites have 43 been recorded in Riverside County alone (McCarthy 1992). At least one pictograph site (Newberry Cave in the Mojave Desert) has been dated to ca. 3500 BP (Davis and Smith 1981). At other sites in western Riverside County, rock paintings were being made into the late eighteenth century. For example, sites lo- cated in Terwilliger Valley (CA-RIV-36) and Andreas Canyon (CA-RIV-68), both within historic Cahuilla territory, are dated by the subject matter of some of the pictographs (Thurman 1970; Quinn 1981; Hedges 1989). Easily recognizable historic theme paintings, usually executed in black, as well as petroglyphs, have been noted throughout the study area within Cahuilla territory. At site CA-RIV-36, there are several horse Figure 14. Examples of rectilinear, maze -like designs found at IMP-75. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) :1! 44 / 30 cm Exfoliation Bullet holes PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand Figure 15. RIV-1715, Rock 1, Panel 6. Photograph showing current condition with bullet holes and spray paint vandal- izing panel. Figure 16. Drawing of RIV-1715, Rock 1. Panel 6. 810 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain Table 3. Additional Rock Art Sites in the Area. 45 Site (CA-) No. of Panels Superimposition No. of Elements Vandalism Comments IMP-33 17 no unknown yes painted and pecked panels; on tufa Fish Spring ( IMP) 4 no unknown no on tufa RIV-10 15 (estimated) no unknown yes on tufa; incomplete data RIV-37 4 no 11 no petroglyphs RIV-193 6 no 10 yes on tufa RIV-1715 14 no 37 yes on tufa RIV-6404 6 no 21 yes on tufa Oasis Trail —A (RIV) 24 yes 77 yes petroglyphs Oasis Trail — B (RIV) 13 no 18 no petroglyphs Oasis Trail — D (RIV) 5 no 22 no petroglyphs Oasis Trail - E (RIV) 108 yes 220 yes petroglyphs and rider figures clearly representing the Spanish interpretation are available in the early ethnographies expedition of Juan Bautista de Anza. The explorer lead of southern California. Much of this interpretation his party through Coyote Canyon in 1774 and stopped relates to rock paintings incorporated into the Luisefio near a Cahuilla settlement (Bolton 1930). girls' adolescence ceremonies. The Luisefio are a neighboring tribe to the west of the Cahuilla. Less is Historical elements can be interpreted as to subject known about the function of petroglyphs. matter, but it is less clear why they were produced. Was it to record such an unusual event, seeing strange Rock art is known to have served many functions, white men in control of and riding animals, or were several of them within the context of shamanic ritu- they images painted by a shaman to understand and als. Everything from recording historical events to control these unusual spirits entering the realm of overseeing archaeoastronomical phenomena may the Cahuilla? It is even more difficult to uncover the have been carried out to one degree or another by the meanings and functions of rock art produced further back in time. Unlike historic graffiti, rock art was cre- ated or supervised by religious and spiritual leaders. Repeated patterns, whether found individually or combined with other design elements, are considered clues to time and place of origin in rock art stud- ies (Schaafsma 1971:3). Given the variety of rock art styles identified in the region, it seems apparent that each style could have served different func- tions or was executed by separate groups within the society (McGowan 1982; Rafter 1983; McCar- thy 1989:10, 1995). Several examples of rock art shamans. Luisefio adolescent girls' ceremonies were directed by shamans. Chumash shamans were re- sponsible for keeping the balance in the universe and spiritual world. In this context, rock paintings have been attributed to archaeoastronomy (Hudson and Underhay 1978; Hudson et al. 1979) among the Chu - mash. However, with the exception of the Luisefio, no examples of specific designs are interpreted in the re- gional ethnographies (Oxendine 1980). More common are accounts that mention the production of rock art with no descriptions or examples of what images were produced (e.g., Dubois 1908a:92; Steward 1929:227; Strong 1929:257, 317). PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 811 Si In Cahuilla ethnography there are hints supporting rock art interpretation. Strong (1929:173) noted that "... no memories of any girl's race, face painting, or rock painting were remembered..." Cahuilla rock painting is known in the area, but apparently its mean- ing has been lost. Bean (1972:125) stated that petro- glyphs were used to mark territorial boundaries, which often were established by a culture hero (Patencio 1943). This may be the case at Coral Mountain. Patencio's "markings" and "signs" may refer to rock art; however, it is sometimes unclear whether he is discussing pictographs or petroglyphs on rocks, or something else. For example, the Cahuilla culture hero Evon ga net, the fox, traveled throughout the area where he lined the country in sections for his tribes to come in more generations, and he made the signs where certain tribes of his people were to come. The signs he made so that the people who came after would see and know. [Patencio 1943:521. Bean (1972:75) described some areas within a vil- lage as "private and restricted to specific individuals because of ritual or sacred connotations." Bean stated that some of these localities contained rock art and were places known to be dangerous because of the presence of powerful beings. Shamans and other ritual leaders frequently had sites of this kind for their own exclusive use, where they carried out esoteric activities. [Bean 1972:74] There are morsels of information about rock art data, but not enough data exists to explain the abundance, distribution, and varied designs used over time. Research conducted by Whitley (1998) has supported the contention that rock art was produced directly or indirectly by shamans to control the spiritual and PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand physical worlds. The rock art at Coral Mountain contains a small subset of designs from several other unique sites located along the shoreline of ancient Lake Cahuilla and in the nearby mountains. Based on the current knowledge of rock art in the region, the images appear to have served several functions that centered around ritual activities. The Coral Mountain images are generally regarded by contemporary Na- tive American Indians, and specifically the Cahuilla, (Bean and Vane 1978) as sacred and to be protected. There are no substantial subsurface deposits at either RIV-193 or RIV-1715. While milling features occur at both sites, they are most abundant at RIV-1715, in- dicating milling was a major activity. Both sites were used to process small hard seeds as evidenced by the metates. Mesquite processing at RIV-1715 is inferred because of the abundance of mortars. Use of the sites seems generally to be casual and specific to rock art production and milling. The artifacts occur scattered along the base of Coral Mountain and are not associ- ated with any substantial cultural deposits compared to nearby large, intense occupation sites. Coral Mountain Graffiti The term graffiti is used to denote non -Native Ameri- can historic designs, such as names, dates, initials, and other images carved or painted on the rocks. The graffiti is separated into historic (pre-1950) and recent (post-1950) graffiti. The earliest graffiti date is 1864 at RIV-1715. The 1864 date is associated with `BAR- NEY." Both the name and date appear to be old, as the entire panel is covered with old growth lichens or moss. `BARNEY" could not be linked to any specific person, but may, for instance, relate to some member of a mining or surveying party. There is a date gap from 1864 until 1902. Additional early dates of 1909, 1910, and 1911 (twice) appear but without associated names. Graffiti that seems to be old is difficult to put into historic context when lacking 812 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain recognizable names and dates. Few names or initials are associated with dates. Dated graffiti prior to 1950 is listed in Table 4. The name "Duro" appears on several panels (Table 4). A prominent Duro family lives at Torres -Martinez Indian Reservation. Lloyd P. Duro was contacted, and based on his recollections of nearly 60 years ago, he provided the following information (personal com- munication, 2003). Lloyd and his brothers, including John C., helped their father gather and load grapes from a nearby ranch in the mid 1940s. Sometimes after work, they would climb the rocks around Coral Mountain or target shoot .22 rifles. Lloyd Duro was 15 years old when he carved his name and the date (LPD 47 1946) at RIV-1715. Little additional information could be gathered on other names, initials, or dates inscribed at Coral Mountain. Other graffiti occurs at both RIV-193 and RIV-1715. Of special interest are several historic designs that ap- pear to represent "kanji," an ethnic graffiti. Coral Mountain Kanji: Historic Japanese Graffiti Kanji refers to ideographic characters. Every charac- ter has a symbolic meaning and alone or with other characters corresponds to a word. The word kanji literally means "Chinese characters." Kanji origi- nated in China, and it was brought to Japan in the Year Actual Inscription Site (RIV-) 1864 Barney 1864 1715 (Graffiti Panel R1 P8) 1902 Todd 1902 193 (Graffiti Panel R1 P1) 1909 1909 193 (Graffiti Panel R1 P) 1909 1909 193 (Graffiti Panel R1 P) 1910 1910 1715 (Graffiti Panel R1 P5) 1911 1911 193 (Graffiti Panel R1 P2) 1911 1911 1715 (Graffiti Panel R3P2) 1919 EM 1919 1715 (Graffiti Panel R1 P9) 1922 R Nicholas 1922 //A.R. 1922 1715 (Graffiti Panel R3P1) 1932 1932 1715 (Graffiti Panel R1 P6) 1937 D. S. ?-10-37 1715 (Graffiti Panel R12) 1939 J. Price / Saginaw / MICH / 39 193 (Graffiti Panel R1 P4) 1940 1940 VMA 1715 (Graffiti Panel R1 P7) 1941 J MERAS 1941 1715 (Graffiti Panel R1P4) 1941 WA 1941 193 (Graffiti Panel R1 P3) 1943 B Lyons 1943 193 (Graffiti Panel R1 P4) 1946 Lloyd Duro 1946 1715 (Graffiti Panel R1 P2) n.d. (1946?) John L Duro; Anne / MJ + CAT 1715 (Graffiti Panel R3P11) 1946 LPD 1946 1715 (Graffiti Panel R1 P3) 1946 Lloyd Duro 1946 // 4/20 // with gothic cross 1715 (Graffiti Panel R1 P13) Table 4. Dated Graffiti within the Study Area. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 813 48 fifth century via Korea. Around the ninth century, the Japanese developed their own writing system based on syllables. Of the two writing systems, Hiragana and Kata kana, Hiragana is more cursive while Kata kana is more angular. Together these two systems are called Kana. Kana consists of 46 signs which were originally kanji, but were simplified over the centuries. Kanji is still used in Japan, but is considered an antiquated form of writing, not gener- ally employed by the average Japanese citizen. Most Japanese names consist of two Kanji characters (Japan-guide.com 2003). The glyphs will be referred to in this report as kanji, although some of the indi- vidual ideograms may be Kana (either Hiragana or Kata kana). There are over 49,000 individual kanji characters. Each character can have several different readings or interpretations depending upon context. A person liter- ate in Chinese kanji will likely interpret them differ- ently from a person literate in Japanese kanji (Omni- glot.com). Sino-Japanese readings are called "ON" readings, and pure Japanese readings are called "kun" readings (O'Neill 1973). Symbolic characters denote particular things or con- cepts. Radical -and -phonetic characters consist of a ba- sic element known as a radical to indicate the general area of meaning of a character and a phonetic element to show its sound or reading. There are extended usages in which a character was used for a meaning different from its original meaning and borrowed us- age in which a character was used for a meaning quite unconnected with its original one. Coral Mountain Japanese kanji graffiti is a unique rock art style for southern California. The term "ideo- glyph" has been selected to describe the kanji petro- glyphs found at Coral Mountain. In general linguistic terminology, kanji characters are termed "ideograms" since they are representational characters used in a tra- ditional writing system. "Glyph" was selected because PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand the characters found at Coral Mountain have been incised into the tufa in general petroglyph fashion. An ideoglyph conveys an idea (ideo) and sometimes is composed of a single character but often several characters. Kanji is usually written left to right and top to bottom. Studying these ideoglyphs has involved a blend of historical linguistic analysis, contextual eth- nographic research, and classic petroglyphic descrip- tion and analysis. Steward (1929) made the first published reference to the Coral Mountain kanji ideoglyphs. He conducted fieldwork among the Cahuilla in the region between 1924 and 1927. While compiling the information for his book, he sent numerous letters to solicit data from knowledgeable locals. Mr. W. E. Schenck provided the observation that they were "Japanese characters" (Steward 1929:86). Later recorders provided sketches of some of the rock art and made no distinction between kanji and aboriginal petroglyphs. Preliminary inquiries of previous researchers and those familiar with the potential kanji glyphs resulted in negative identifi- cation of the glyphs as being kanji or any other form of Asian writing (Quinn, personal communication 2003). In a survey of the Coral Mountain area, which included RIV-1715, Drover and Smith (2002) noted the rock art and made a recommendation for a focused, expert documentation effort. The literature on kanji rock art in southern California is sparse since these types of petroglyphs are rare. The only published report noted during the course of archival research on Asian petroglyphs found in southern California is by Turner (1971). These kanji were located on small granitic boulders at the Jeffrey's Ranch above Del Rosa in 1938 and were subsequently moved to the San Bernardino County Museum. The glyphs were also discussed in a Master's thesis by Gerald Smith (1939), who noted 814 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain their remarkable resemblance to ancient and modern Chinese writing. Turner's report noted that there was no evidence of Chinese settlers in this region. He incorporated translations by various Chinese, Japanese, and Mandarin speakers with mixed results. Turner concluded that the glyphs were likely of historic age and made with a steel chisel by a Japa- nese person (Turner 1971). Five kanji were trans- lated with a level of confidence: "Great," "Japan," "Okayama," "North," and "America." Was this a memorial to the Japanese homeland and a commem- oration of travel to America? Such memorials are found within traditional Japanese cultural practices (Charles Farley, personal communication 2003). Two Coral Mountain sites have ideoglyphs of a kanji style. There are two panels at RIV-193. A single ideoglyph with four characters is incised into a boulder on the east face of a tufa-covered boulder, designated as Graffiti Rock 3, Panel 1 (Figure 17). The ideoglyph's dimensions are approximately 45 cm in length by 24 cm at the widest measurement. The average width of the carved lines is 2.5 cm, and the average depth of the lines is approximately 1.5 cm. The technique of manufacture of this ideoglyph is consistent with a hammer and chisel method given the precision and depth of the design. The glyph is eroding because of the nature of the tufa and its cal- cium carbonate composition. The second RIV-193 panel is a single ideogram, which has been translat- ed as "east" or "higashi" (Suski and Suski, personal communication 2003). This panel will be discussed in more detail later. The RIV-1715 kanji consists of two ideoglyphs also incised into the tufa. There are several characters in two parallel rows, all on the same panel, designated Graffiti Rock 1 Panel 1 (Figure 18). The rows mea- sure approximately 48 cm by 95 cm and 46 cm by 170 cm, and the rows are located 40 cm apart. The width of the incised lines of these kanji averages 2.5 cm, and the average depth is 1.5 cm. These glyphs 49 were likely made by the hammer and chisel method using metal tools. The workmanship appears very consistent. The Kanji in Row A consists of perhaps three charac- ters. Originally, there may have been more characters at the bottom of Row A, but Row A has sustained some damage either by bullets, perhaps by climbers brushing past it while creating graffiti on the same panel, or through purposeful scraping a portion of the ideoglyph in creating an engraving of a horse. The Kanji in the longer row (Row B) consists of five characters and is only slightly impacted by erosion of the tufa. Kanji characters can be described and categorized by the number of "strokes" they contain in order to aid in interpretation when a meaning is not known. Counting the strokes in each Coral Mountain character aided in interpretation efforts by narrowing down potential candidates. Kanji characters are written with specific ordering of strokes. However, no attempt was made in this study to determine which stroke came first on the tufa. It is doubtful that stroke order could be ac- curately determined unless an intense study of their manufacture is conducted. An example is the simple two-stroke character shown in Figure 19. A figure similar to this (Row B, Glyph Element 2) found at RIV-1715 was originally used to represent a needle but has been "borrowed" to write the numeral "ten" (O'Neill 1973). The etymology of kanji is a complex study in itself. Through time the characters became more stylized and abbreviated into a form of shorthand. New characters are created and meanings assigned as needed. The Coral Mountain kanji ideoglyphs were made between ca. 1910 and ca. 1927. The style of the kanji ideoglyphs at Coral Mountain is of the modern ideo- graphic form and not a prehistoric or early historic form. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 815 50 The first Japanese settlers to the Coachella Valley arrived in 1900 (Shibata 1985; Laflin 1998; Suski and Suski, personal communication 2003). There is some published and unpublished information about these pioneering families (Mitchell 1986). Our research at the Coachella Valley Historical Museum revealed a list of family names of Japa- nese settlers in the valley that included the name "Higashi." This name matches with the interpreta- tion of the southern -most ideoglyph at RIV-193 that was interpreted by Suski and Suski as "hi- gashi," or east (Figure 20). That the glyph faces the east direction may be a coincidence. The Higashi Figure 17. Kanji ideoglyph at RIV-193. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand family came to the valley about 1910 and left the valley after a few years. Mr. Higashi may have been employed by the railroad, but he was not ac- tive in farming (Suski and Suski, personal commu- nication 2003). Possibly, this glyph was carved by a member of the Higashi family sometime between 1910 and 1927, when Japanese characters were reported to Julian Steward (1929). The Suskis (personal communication 2003) speculated that the Coral Mountain area may have been a picnic spot for local families, and during an outing, someone carved "Higashi" into the tufa. Use as a picnic spot was confirmed by Harry Quinn (personal communica- Figure 18. Kanji ideoglyphs at RIV-1715. Left is Row A; right is Row B. we Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain Figure 19. Example of a two-stroke character. Adapted from O'Neill 2003. tion 2003) in his interviews with Kathy Kirby. The Suskis recalled the Higashi family, especially the daughter Tokiko. Mr. Suski placed a telephone call to Mr. Charles Shibata, another Japanese American elder of Indio, and inquired about the whereabouts of Tokiko Higashi. Mr. Shibata recalled her, but could provide little information. It is rare when rock art can be interpreted with any level of confidence, much less the maker identified. A portion of the kanji sequence at the north point of Coral Mountain (RIV-1715) can be interpreted literally as "three moon" and can be refined to "third month," likely the month of March. Mrs. Suski also interpreted this glyph as third month, or March (Quinn, personal communication 2003). Generally, March has good weather conducive to picnicking. Point Happy Ranch, homesteaded by Norman "Hap- py" Lundbeck, apparently employed ranch hands of Mexican, Japanese, and American descent around the turn of the nineteenth century. Housing was provided in a community setting on the ranch. The ranch was located in what later became La Quinta, not far away from the project area. The kanji could have been pro- duced by workers from the ranch as well. Figure 20. Ideograph representing east in kanji. Adapted from O'Neill 2003. The kanji ideoglyphs are distinct among the collection of rock art and graffiti at Coral Mountain because of their unique design and their consistent manufacture with deep and wide incisions. They are very unlike other petroglyphs observed at the site. Once located, the ideoglyphs tend to stand out at various times in moving sunlight. They tend to photograph well during the early morning sunlight and again in the late afternoon light. The Coral Mountain kanji petroglyphs are signifi- cant on several levels. They are a rare and ethnically unique form of historic rock art within the southern California region and within the Coachella Valley. The kanji are easily linked to the pioneering Japanese - American farming families living in the Coachella Valley. Descendants are still involved in this com- munity, creating a continuum of Japanese -American presence in the desert valley for over a 100 years. Acknowledgments David M. Smith, The Keith Companies, Inc. and Re- nee Kolvet, Bureau of Reclamation, lent their support throughout the project. David provided maps, copies of reports of previous research, and a copy of their Phase 1 Survey Report of Coral Mountain. We are PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 817 52 most thankful to Mike Gorman, Landmark Photogra- phy, for taking the aerial photographs. Bob Tyler was very helpful in providing further background information on historic places of the area. Jenny Worth provided much needed field assistance, worked on completing rock art recording forms and did an exemplary job producing the drawings. Michael Blodgett and Carolyn McCarthy provided assistance in conducting the fieldwork. It was through their good cheer that the authors were able to spend so much time completing this project. Special acknowledgment is given to Mr. Lloyd P. Duro for sharing his boyhood remembrances. The authors wish to thank the anony- mous reviewers for their comments. The authors alone are responsible for any errors or omissions. References Cited Baumhoff, Martin A., R. F. Heizer, and Albert B. Elsasser 1958 Lagomarsino Petroglyph Group (Site 26-St- 1) Near Virginia City, Nevada. University of California Archaeological Survey Report 43(2):1-17. Berkeley. Bean, Lowell John 1972 Mukats People: The Cahuilla Indians of Southern California. University of California Press, Berkeley. Bean, Lowell J., and Katherine Siva Saubel 1972 Temalpakh: Cahuilla Indian Knowledge and Usage of Plants. Malki Museum Press, Ban- ning, California. Bean, Lowell J., and Sylvia Brakke Vane (editors) 1978 Persistence and Power: A Study of Native American Peoples in the Sonoran Desert and the Devers-Palo Verde High Voltage Trans- mission Line. Report prepared for Southern PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand California Edison Company by Cultural Sys- tems Research, Inc. Rosemead, California. Blodgett, Michael T. 2003 The Nature of the Coral Mountain Tufa as a Canvas for Rock Art. Paper presented at the Coachella Valley Archaeological Society Symposium, May 10, 2003. Bolton, Herbert Eugene 1930 Anzas California Expeditions. 5 vols. Uni- versity of California Press, Berkeley. Davis, C. Alan, and Gerald A. Smith 1981 Newberry Cave. San Bernardino County Museum Association, Redlands, California. Drover, Christopher E. and David M. Smith 2002 A Phase I Cultural Resources Survey for the Coral Mountain Regional Park, City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California. Copies available from The Keith Companies, Irvine. DuBois, Constance G. 1908a The Religion of the Luisefio Indians of Southern California. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 8(3):69-173. Berkeley. 1908b Ceremonies and Traditions of the Dieguefio Indians of Southern California. Journal of American Folk -Lore 21(81-82):228-236. Fenenga, Franklin 1949 Methods of Recording and Present Status of Knowledge Concerning Petroglyphs in California. University of California Archaeo- logical Survey, No. 3. Berkeley. Freers, Stephen M. 1998 Lending a "Hand" to the San Luis Rey Style. American Indian Rock Art 22:57-78. 818 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain Gallagos, Dennis 1987 Cultural Resource Inventory for Rancho La Quinta. Report on file at the Eastern Informa- tion Center, California Historical Resources Inventory System, Department of Anthropol- ogy, University of California, Riverside. Hedges, Kenneth E. 1970 An Analysis of Diegueno Pictographs. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, California State University, San Diego. 1973 Rock Art in Southern California. Pacific Coast Archaeological Society Quarterly 9(4):1-28. 1979 The Rancho Bernardo Style in Southern Cali- fornia. American Indian Rock Art 5:51-58. 1982 Great Basin Rock Art Styles: A Revisionist View. American Indian Rock Art 7&8:205- 211. 1989 Sketches and Scratches. Rock Art Papers 6:91-99. San Diego Museum Papers, No. 24. San Diego Museum of Man, San Diego. Heizer, Robert F. 1953 Sacred Rain Rocks of Northern California. University of California Archaeological Sur- vey Reports 20:33-38. Berkeley. Heizer, Robert F., and Martin A. Baumhoff 1962 Prehistoric Rock Art of Nevada and Eastern California. University of California Press, Berkeley. Heizer, Robert F., and C. William Clewlow 1973 Prehistoric Rock Art of California. Ballena Press, Ramona, California. Hudson, Travis, Georgia Lee, and Ken Hedges 1979 Solstice Observers and Observatories in Native California. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology l(1):39-63. 53 Hudson, Travis, and Ernest Underhay 1978 Crystals in the Sky: A Intellectual Odyssey Involving Chumash Astronomy, Cosmology and Rock Art. Ballena Press Anthropological Papers No. 10. Socorro, New Mexico. Japan-guide.com 2003 Katakana, Kanji, Hiragana. Electronic docu- ment, http://www.japan-guide.com/e/e2048. html, accessed February 12, 2003. Kelly, William 1977 Cocopah Ethnography. University of Arizona Anthropological Papers No. 29. Tucson. Laflin, Patricia 1998 Coachella Valley, California: A Pictorial History. The Donning Company Publishers, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Loeb, E. M. 1926 Porno Folkways. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 19(2). Berkeley. Love, Bruce, Harry Quinn, Michael Hogan and Mariam Dandul 2000 Interim Cultural Resources Report: Archaeo- logical Testing and Mitigation Shea Homes Portion of the Coral Mountain Project, near La Quinta, Riverside County, California. Re- port on file at the Eastern Information Center, California Historical Resources Inventory System, Department of Anthropology, Uni- versity of California, Riverside. Love, Bruce, Bai Tang, Harry Quinn and Richard H. Norwood 1998 Cultural Resources Report: Coral Mountain Project, Coachella Valley, Riverside County, California. Report on file at the Eastern Information Center, California Historical PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) ME 54 Resources Inventory System, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. Loubser, Johannes H. N. 1997 Use of the Harris Diagrams in Recording, Conserving, and Interpreting Rock Paintings. 1991 International Newsletter on Rock Art 18:14- 21. Foix, France. McCarthy, Daniel F. 1978 Introduction to Rock Art of Joshua Tree Na- tional Monument. American Indian Rock Art 1992 4:41-56. 1981 Rock Art Dating at Travertine Point, Imperial County, California. American Indian Rock Art 6:107-117. 1987 Site record update for CA-RIV-193. Record on file at the Eastern Information Center, California Historical Resources Inventory System, Department of Anthropology, Uni- versity of California, Riverside. 1989 Rock Art Studies at Lake Perris State Rec- reation Area. Documentation and manage- ment plan for the rock art at Lake Perris State Recreation Area, for State of Califor- nia Department of Parks and Recreation, Southern Region Headquarters, San Diego, California. Report on file at the Eastern Information Center, California Historical Resources Inventory System, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. 1990 Preliminary Investigations of the Rock Art within the San Joaquin Hills Transporta- tion Corridor. In Final Test Investigation Report and Request for Determination of Eligibility for 23 Sites Along the San Joaquin Hills Transportation Corridor, by Philip de Barros and Henry C. Koerper, Appendix K:1-9. Prepared by Chambers Group, Inc. for the Transportation Corridor PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand Agencies, Santa Ana, California. Report on file at the South Central Coastal Informa- tion Center, California Historical Re- sources Inventory System, Department of Anthropology, California State University, Fullerton. Documentation of Two Painted Superim- posed Rock Art Styles at CA-RIV-114, Motte-Rimrock Reserve, Western Riverside County, California. Rock Art Papers 8:75- 80. San Diego Museum Papers, No. 27. San Diego Museum of Man, San Diego. The California Archaeological Inventory and Rock Art Studies. American Indian Rock Art 15:39-47. 1993 Prehistoric Land -Use at McCoy Spring, an Arid -Land Oasis in Eastern Riverside County, California. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Univer- sity of California, Riverside. 1994 The California Archaeological Inventory and Rock Art Studies. American Indian Rock Art 15:39-47. 1995 The Rock Art of Tahquitz Canyon. In Ar- chaeological, Ethnographic, and Ethno- historic Investigations at Tahquitz Canyon Palm Springs, California, by Cultural Sys- tems Research, Inc., pp. XIX:1-24. Report on file at the Eastern Information Center, California Historical Resources Inven- tory System, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. McCarthy, Daniel F., and Leslie Mouriquand 2003 Two Rock Art Sites (CA-RIV-193 and CA- RIV-171 S) at Coral Mountain, La Quinta, Riverside County, California. Report on file at the Eastern Information Center, Califor- nia Historical Resources Inventory System, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. 820 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain McDonald, Meg, Michael F. Rodarte, and Daniel F. McCarthy 1996 An Intensive Survey of Smith Creek Park, City of Banning, California. Prepared by ASM Affiliates, Inc. for the City of Ban- ning. Report on file at the Eastern Informa- tion Center, California Historical Resources Inventory System, Department of Anthropol- ogy, University of California, Riverside. McGowan, Charlotte 1982 Ceremonial Fertility Sites in Southern Cali- fornia. San Diego Museum Papers, No. 14. San Diego Museum of Man, San Diego. Minor, Rick 1975 The Pit -and -Groove Petroglyph Style in South- ern California. San Diego Museum of Man Ethnic Technology Notes, No. 15. San Diego. Mitchell, Kathleen 1986 Submarines, Salsa, and Pottery Shards: A Narrative History of Coachella. Internship project in partial fulfillment of Master's requirement, University of California, River- side, 1991. Omniglot.com 2003 Omniglot: A Guide to Writing Systems. http://www.omniglot.com/writing/chinese. htm, accessed February 12, 2003. O'Neill P. G. 1973 Essential Kanji: 2, 000 Basic Japanese Char- acters Systematically Arranged for Learning and Reference. Weatherhill, Inc., Trumbull, Connecticut. Oxendine, Joan 1980 The Luiseiio Girls' Ceremony. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 2(1):37-50. 55 Patencio, Francisco 1943 Stories and Legends of the Palm Springs Indians. Times -Mirror Press, Los Angeles. Payen, Louis A. 1966 Prehistoric Rock Art in the Northern Sierra Nevada, California. Unpublished Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Sacra- mento State College, California. Plymale-Schneeberger, Sandra 2003 Preliminary Analysis of the Prehistoric Ceramics at CA-RIV-1715, CA-RIV-7052, CA-RIV-7053, Coral Mountain, La Quinta, Riverside, California. In A Class III Cul- tural Resources Inventory: 123 Acre Coral Mountain Regional Park, City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, California. Report on file at the Eastern Information Center, Cali- fornia Historical Resources Inventory Sys- tem, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. Quinn, Harry M. 1981 Two Unusual Mountain Cahuilla Rock Art Sites in Southern California. American Indian Rock Art 6:118-129. Rafter, John 1983 Mockingbird Canyon's Milky Way. Rock Art Papers 1:75-80. San Diego Museum Papers, No 16. San Diego Museum of Man, San Diego. Schaafsma, Polly 1971 The Rock Art of Utah. Papers of the Peabody Museum of Anthropology and Ethnology 65. Harvard University, Cambridge. Schroth, Adella, and Daniel F. McCarthy 1987 Cultural Resources Assessment of Tentative Tract 22359 Amendment #1 Located Near San Jacinto in Riverside County, California. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 821 56 Report on file at the Eastern Information Center, Archaeological Research Unit, Cali- fornia Historical Resources Inventory Sys- tem, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. Scientific Resource Surveys, Inc. 1979 Archaeological Survey Report on the O'Neal Property, Coachella Valley, Riverside County, California. Report on file at the Eastern Information Center, Archaeological Research Unit, California Historical Resources Inven- tory System, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. Shepard, Eugene, and Mr. Gearheart 1973 Site record for CA-RIV-193. Record on file at the Eastern Information Center, Archaeo- logical Research Unit, California Historical Resources Inventory System, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. Shibata, Charles 1985 History of the Japanese in Coachella Valley. Ms. on file at the Coachella Valley Historical Museum, Indio, California. Smith, David M. 2003 A Class III Cultural Resources Inventory: 123 Acre Coral Mountain Regional Park, City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, California. Report on file at the Eastern Information Center, California Historical Resources Inventory System, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. Smith, Gerald A. 1939 The Influence of the White Man upon the Culture of the Indians of the San Bernardino PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand Valley. Unpublished Master's thesis, Univer- sity of Redlands. Smith, Gerald A., and Michael K. Lerch 1984 Cupule Petroglyphs in Southern California. San Bernardino County Museum Association Quarterly 32(1&2):1-17. Smith, Gerald A., and Wilson G. Turner 1975 Indian Rock Art of Southern California. San Bernardino County Museum Association, Redlands, California. Stafford, Mr. 1947 Site record for CA-RIV-37. Record on file at the Eastern Information Center, Califor- nia Historical Resources Inventory System, Department of Anthropology, University of California, Riverside. Steward, Julian H. 1929 Petroglyphs of California and Adjoining States. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 24(2):47-238. Berkeley. Strong, William D. 1929 Aboriginal Society in Southern Califor- nia. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 26(1):1-358. Berkeley. Thurman, Frank 1970 The Cahuillas and White Men of San Car- los and Coyote Canyon. San Bernardino County Museum Association Quarterly 17(4). True, D. L. 1954 Pictographs of the San Luis Rey Basin, California. American Antiquity 20(1):68-72. 822 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain True, D. L., and M. A. Baumhoff 1981 Pitted Rock Petroglyphs in Southern Califor- nia. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 3(2):257-268. Turner, Wilson G. 1971 The Jeffery's Stones. San Bernardino County Museum Quarterly 19(2):1-17. Westec Services, Inc. 1987 Cultural Resource Inventory for Rancho La Quinta. Report on file at the Eastern Informa- tion Center, California Historical Resources Inventory System, Department of Anthropol- ogy, University of California, Riverside. Whitley, David S. 1998 Meaning & Metaphor in the Coso Petro - glyphs: Understanding Great Basin Rock Art. In Coso Rock Art: A New Perspective, edited by Elva Younkin, pp. 109-168. Maturango Press, Ridgecrest, California. 2000 The Art of the Shaman: Rock Art of Califor- nia. University of Utah Press, Salt Lake City. 57 Wilke, Philip J., and Lois A. Wilke 1978 A New Site with Tufa-Coated Petroglyphs near Travertine Point, Imperial County, Cali- fornia. Journal of New World Archaeology 2(4):9-14. Worth, Jenny C. 2003 Rock Art along the Oasis Trail: Preliminary Observations. Paper presented at the Ameri- can Rock Art Research Association Confer- ence, May 2003, San Bernardino, California. PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 823 58 Appendix: Scaled Drawings CA-RIV 193 30 cm Rock 1, Panel 1 30 cm Rock 1, Panel 4 30 cm Rock 2, Panel 1, Element c PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand vt 30 cm 30 cm Rock 1, Panel 2 Rock 1, Panel 3 30 cm Rock 2, Panel 1, Element a 30 cm Rock 3, Panel 1 0 30 cm Rock 2, Panel 1, Element b 824 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain CA-RIV 1715 F1 Rock 1, Panel 1 30 cm Rock 1. Panel 4 30 cm Rock 1. Panel 7 fFI 30 cm Rock 1, Panel 2 - I30 cm Rock 1. Panel 5 30 cm Rock 1. Panel 8 Rock 1, Panel 3 Rock 1. Panel 6 � S • Rock 1. Panel 9 I 30 cm 30 cm 59 PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 825 60 i" 0 30 cm 30 cm Rock 1, Panel 10 Rock 1, Panel 11 30 cm 30 cm Rock 3, Panel 1 Rock 2, Panel 1 PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) McCarthy and Mouriquand V 30 cm Rock 1, Panel 12 826 Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain CA-RIV 6404 Rock 1 Panel 1 0 30 cm Rock 3 Panel 2 30 cm Rock 2 Panel 1 30 cm Rock 3 Panel 3 tgo 61 r 30 cm 0 Rock 3 Panel 1 30 cm Rock 3 Panel 4 PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 827 PCAS Quarterly, 41(4) 828 Written Comments Public Hearing October 28 2025 City of La Quinta Planning Commission Mary Mann, La Quinta resident 80451 Palatine Ct, maryhpmann@gmail.com, 775-527-8963 Opposition to the TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001, AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 Club at Coral Mt. project There are significant environmental, societal and economic impacts of the implementation of Amendment V to SP 03-067 and the related Development Agreement. This is a large and complex project, and time should be taken to review before this project is allowed to begin. I urge the Planning Commission to vote no on approval of these maps and development plans today there are too many unanswered questions. The underlying development agreement is flawed, as are the underlying environmental documents. Residents, agency concerns regarding water use, air quality, traffic, circulation, expected revenues and costs to the City etc. were not addressed in the EIR or development agreement for current project. The staff report for the current applications do not adequately clear these up. La Quinta deserves a better project on this special property. Here are some questions as and comments that relate to the environmental approval and review of this project that directly relate to the TTM and Development plans under consideration today: 1) Original Notice of Preparation referred to preparation of the specific plan specific to this property from the Andalusia plan. Amendment V was intended only to separate this property from the original larger project. The initial the Draft EIR refers to SP2020-0002, which was never adopted and no longer referenced in the project. The changes added Amendment V to SP 03-067 are confusing and in some places inaccurate for example references to project phases that are no longer applicable. 2) Another stipulation in the original NOP was that the Wave project offered recreational opportunities and so the EIR did not need to be considered in the EIR, so theywere not. The recreational opportunities offered by the golf course plan (as now presented) has a much different recreational offering and so does not meet that stipulation of the original NOP. So the Recreational aspects should have been added to the draft EIR and it should have been recirculated. 3) This plan of this development is markedly different that the project that was subject to the EIR. The mitigation measures in many categories including water use, traffic, circulation, air quality, etc, are weak with platitudes, or do not even address what is asked. The documents approved are lengthy and confusing and contains many 829 contradictions. This makes it impossible to understand if the current applications meet the requirements of the EIR or the Development agreement. 4) The biological resources on Coral Mountain were not adequately identified, documented, or considered as they would be impacted by the project and particularly by a barrier fence -bats, raptors, habitat. This should be analyzed with respect to the entire Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, not selectively for PBS. BLM should be notified and comments received regarding the fence construction and other impacts 5) Statements regarding consistency with La Quinta general plan are inadequate 6) Alternative 2 was not adequately described in EIR to allow for analysis of impacts, appropriateness of proposed mitigation, let alone approval. It is difficult to assess whether or not the TTM or development plans comply with all the final stipulations of the development agreement and EIR. 7) Proposed barrier fence along Coral Mountain is a considerable change to the potential impacts of the project to known sensitive resources that exist on the property and are connected outside the property 8) In TTM and Site Development permit under consideration the proposed alignment of fence will negatively impact biological, tribal and cultural resources, historical, and recreational opportunities on and adjacent to the property 9) The presence and activity of the PBS were not analyzed as they particularly apply to the project site. The statement in Staff report that the PBS are frequently seen there is refuted by the comments of in the comments of ELMT and others that show there is is only limited foraging habitat on Coral Mountain and that the alluvial plain on the west side of coral mountain is not likely to be traversed by the sheep, making the activity on Coral Mountain much less. 10) The proposed mitigation measure to prevent PBS migration to the property does not consider the geomorphology of this site which makes the activity on Coral Mountain of the PBS limited. The stipulation of adding a fence should have receive further scrutiny, not knee jerk adoption. Many other concerns raised along with the potential detrimental impacts to the PBS in the from the USFS and other organizations were not addressed at all. 11) Specific documentation of the effectiveness and appropriateness of the barrier fencing solution in this location has not been completed. Many miles of this fencing have been completed in of La Quinta in the past few years whose effectiveness and unintended impacts have not been realized or documented 12) The fencing also impedes the development of the public trail that CM Wave Corp included in the original plan and seems to be implied in this iteration of the project 830 13) Fencing will also impede the development of the long proposed public park on the adjoining property Development agreement and fees could be implemented to directly assist DRD in developing the park 14) The property contains sensitive habitat on Coral Mountain that is connected and intertwined with sensitive environmental areas on Coral Mountain that exist on the lower and higher elevations. The project did not consider the impacts to the whole connected feature. a. Coral Mountain and the tufa shoreline is a unique geologic feature that was not recognized in the EIR and runs beyond the property on both sides b. Hole 14 is much too close to the tufa and related features 15) The lake that is proposed on the property is not specifically mentioned in Golf course development plan, though it is shown on the tract map and grading plan. When would this lake be constructed? What will it be used for? How deep is it, how much water does it contain? Its location is significantly different from that of the water feature in the original project. 16) What is the plan for Lots 203, 204, and W ? How many ultimate units are planed? Where will the recreation amenities be? 17) Will any native vegetation particularly trees Palo Verde and Mesquite Hummock be preserved as stipulated in BIO mitigation measures? 18) The property has a historic adobe structure that is mandated to be 'preserved' but left to the developer as to how to clean up the structure and present it. The documents regarding the project have very little information on the history of this structure. Future maintenance is a burden of the eventual homeowners association. How does this align with the City Municipal code on historic preservation? Was the Historic Preservation Commission of the City was consulted? 19) Especially given the rarity of the native features in the tufa that mark the ancient shoreline, how do the proposed mitigation measures especially along the base of Coral Mt. align with the City Municipal code title 7, goals and policies regarding historic preservation in the Cultural Resources Element of the General Plan and Historic preservation ordinance? At this point there are required to be monitors during construction phase, but I would like to see more attention given to the preservation of these features for the documentation of our history. I would hope that the Historical Society would be an integral part of the conversation as to how to document and preserve these features and provide opportunities for discovery of our history. I have may other particular questions, the state of the documentation of the project has made it quite difficult to understand what the plans are and how they will be implemented. 831 It is the responsibility of the Planning Commission to assess these projects and as residents help to bring projects to our City that will have a positive impact. This property is very special. La Quinta deserves a better project. Please see attached some of the other comments I have presented this year at open public comment at City Council and Planning Commission regarding this project. 832 La Quinta City Council 21 October 2025-Written Comments Items not on agenda Topic: Recall Specific Plan Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment 5-Halt the building of the proposed barrier fence, view -obstructing wall and plan for public recreation, do not approve current applications to be considered by planning commission on 28 Oct. Speaker: Mary Mann 80451 Palatine Ct La Quinta CA 92253 mobile 775-527-8963 maryhpmann@gmail.com Coral Mountain should be the Gem of La Quinta and gateway to the Santa Rosa Wilderness area. There is a wonderful opportunity here for the City of La Quinta and its leadership to engage with the surrounding landowners and stakeholders including a new community of residents that now lives in south La Quinta. I want to see my City take a good look at this area south of Avenue 54, how it has grown and changed under the current general plan and what will be needed for the future. The City can lead to encourage development that allows for and embraces the natural environment, allowing for enjoyment and access to the Wilderness on our western boundary that so many of us crave. This is in direct alignment with the City Mission Statement and several of the Goals set forth in the Strategic Plan. The area in question is a local haunt for seeking solace in the desert, hiking, mountain biking, walking dogs, playing, flying, hot air balloon launches! It is accessed by increasing numbers of people, noticeable even in the few years since we moved in. There is character and solidarity we are building in this neighborhood and community, despite being behind walls and being >6 miles from any City amenities or services. 10/21/25 Written Public comment Save Coral Mt. 833 2 qN Figure 1: View of Coral Mountain from the designated Natural Open Space planned park. Ancient Lake Cuilla Shoreline clearly visible, dike built and maintained (?) By Bureau of Reclamation. Current popular trail access for hiking, horseback riding, camping. Designating this area, or planning for park development not addressed in Club at Coral Specific Plan planning documents. CVWD infrasturcture (our water supply) is also present in this area. Blocking off the view scape is not required for this to be a successful project. Coral Mountain is a beautiful treasure. This view now shared by those commuting on Madison and the many morning outdoor enthusiasts walking, biking, hiking, sitting and watching the sunrise. It is our history written on the walls and should remain visible. It is the last exposure of the shoreline in this area and is noted in many guidebooks, and descriptions of the area already. Coral Mountain beckons from the north coming down Jefferson, and it can be seen from many parts of the East Valley. It is already a draw for visitors. 10/21/25 Written Public comment Save Coral Mt. 834 3 Figure 2: Coral Mountain lit up by the morning sun. Proposed walls would obscure the view of the unique documented shoreline feature from Madison, 581 and 60th. Peekaboo views should be possible through the community. This is a documented site and last remaining examples of the tufa feature that contains ecologic and geologic wonders plus prehistoric and historic artifacts, and flood control infrastructure in use today, and used as a walking path. That provides a tremendous welcome to La Quinta and proudly displays our natural history. In particular an 8' high fence that received no vetting on its effectiveness for the stated purpose of protecting sheep and its path ignores the unique archaeological and ecological features it would bisect. Damage to this would have a detrimental effect on the planned conservation efforts of DRD and others that are revealed in the initial planning for the Coral Mountain Park. 10/21/25 Written Public comment Save Coral Mt. 835 0 4.t- { Figure 3: Popular hike is the Coral Mountain loop, which passes in front of the mountain. The mottled lower part is the tufa that was created by an algae in the ancient Lake Cahuilla (latest high stand in 1700s). The mountain itself is a twisted metamorphic rock exposed and thrust up as the Salton Basin has been forming over tens of millions of years. The "coral" have been marked by humans through time, with many grindstone type features ground into the tufa to make little bowls, these are present in the parts where a flat boulder has a thick layer of tufa on it. There are ancient rock writings clear through present. Exploring these features is a known activity and people come from all over the valley to see this. Below are photos of damage done with bright spray paint within the ecologically, prehistoric and historically sensitive areas for the project about a month ago. These markings crosses features documented and stated in develpement plan EIR (faulty as it is) that they would not be disturbed. 10/21/25 Written Public comment Save Coral Mt. 836 5 rT: - Y . .moo Figure: Spray paint on Coral below archaeological features. One example of defacement of the documented sensitive ground along Coral Mountain for this golf course project. Maps have not been approved by planning and public has not seen more than conceptual drawings that seemed to indicated there was flexibility in where the boundary of the project would be. Spray paint is on the tufa, where we should be preventing further damage, this adds to it. 10/21/25 Written Public comment Save Coral Mt. 837 10/21/25 Written Public comment Save Coral Mt. 838 7 AV do -/ • /'� �• w ' J �- i4 -fly �� ��, `"� � • + 1 jI �" �D l The newly released maps and development permit will be considered at Planning Commission meeting next week on October 28 2025 (Notice of Public Hearing issued Oct. 17). The maps and presentation released for consideration verify that the line of the proposed barrier fence will be too close or bisect these documented sensitive areas, and prevent the building of a through trial link for the popular Coral Mountain loop, or emergency access. The line also comes too close to sensitive areas in the for viewing of the archaeological sites. 10/21/25 Written Public comment Save Coral Mt. 839 \yQ�oQ`�\ten -a e NOTE V r gC0 ENVIRONMENTAU \r SENSITIVE AREA If v_ NOGRADINGI PBS FENCE Proposed fence line thr 'Jgh'coral' Please define what r constitutes an environmentally sensitive area and please show these areas as they extend beyond protect boundary. NO1F Please explain the plan for AREA protecting environmentally sensitive areas I ®MSA CONS=L,TING Imo. f Plan Set The new tentative tract map revealed yesterday notes that a trail will be built by DRD and the Cahuilla tribe. Please request more information about these status of these agreements and assure that they will be met. Also please have line of the trail defined on the maps before acceptance. Coral Mountain Regional Park. From what I have been able to glean online whatever plans for this new DRD community resource have been stalled and the BOR agreement it is tied to may be expiring. La Quinta is going forward with building private golf course development under a specific plan amendment that was soundly opposed by the community at the time. Under the plan for the new development, there are several references to the pending DRD park facility as mitigation of the adding of people, infrastructure and cutting off of public access for recreation. Despite this, there did not seem to be any partnership opportunity extended to the DRD to create a facility that will accommodate the needs of this part of the District and City of La Quinta. Take the time and effort to develop plans for how our City will interface with natural open space, providing low impact benefits to citizens and visitors. These efforts in community building and allowing the public, stakeholder agencies and groups to create a plan that 10/21/25 Written Public comment Save Coral Mt. 840 E could make Coral Mountain the Gem of La Quinta will be rewarded in civic pride and attraction to the area. I point to numerous new events such as the Iron Man, which will attract lovers of sport and the outdoors. How can we provide ways for these events to continue and host these visitors in such a way that they will want to come back or stay? One way is to provide amenities that are accessible and open to the public. Places for people to get out, explore, experience the desert, have a picnic, take a hike, ride a bike. The current plan for this property will cut off hundreds of acres from any other use, prevent public through fare and block access to public areas, already popularly used for 100s of years. Once the Developer leaves we are in blocks of isolated homes, each Homeowner placed under an additional burden of maintenance, cost "tax" of the Homeowners Associations, with cut & pasted CC&Rs from faraway communities. This may look good on paper at the outset, but it is ultimately damaging to our bottom line, community, and quality of life. The risks associated with water supply, natural disasters, maintenance of infrastructure that will be borne directly by the City, CVWD, IID, County of Riverside and our neighbors in Indio and the City Sphere of influence as well as the ultimate new homeowners in the community. These are long-term ongoing costs and risks that have not been considered. The one agreement that DRD signed with the Applicant for development of this property in a previous iteration of the project was to build a trail. The letter stated that this would be negated if the BOR agreement with DRD expires. This would mean the loss of the one concession the developer was asked to provide to maintain even minimal access to the public to lands that have been identified as unique in many respects, geologically, ecologically, have historically and currently provided desert recreation opportunities for the whole Valley and beyond. We have added hundreds of people to this part of the Valley (South La Quinta, Indio) in only a few years with many new private developments but the Cities (La Quinta in particular) have not been compelled to provide any public recreation facilities or even planned for these. There does not seem to be any planning for maintaining access around Coral Mountain for exploration and entering into the Santa Rosa Wilderness. We desperately need to get an integrated plan together. There are many agencies involved, DRD, City of La Quinta, Indio, Riverside County, BLM, BOR, CVWD, IID, Tribes. Riverside County and partners are investing a lot into upgrades to the Lake Cahuilla Park. I have not seen that La Quinta has been proactive at all in planning for new recreational visitors to the area. 10/21/25 Written Public comment Save Coral Mt. 841 10 We truly need a facility that would be the Gateway to the Santa Rosa wilderness and offer a trail head, picnic and staging area, parking, restrooms. This is already a popular area for mountain biking, hiking, horseback riding, exploration of the archaeological and historical artifacts, discovery of desert fauna and flora, off-roading, climbing, dog -walking, horseback riding, prayer and reflection. The use of the area around Coral Mountain has increased dramatically even in the short time I have lived in this particular spot in the Valley. It is now critically important that the District bring this Coral Mountain Regional Park project back to the top of the list. You, City of La Quinta, have the power activate discussions with the developer, DRD and with other government entities to plan for development of the Coral Mountain Regional park, or find other groups, citizens who can assist in opening a dialogue around planning for saving of our existing desert recreation opportunities at Coral Mountain and Santa Rosa Wilderness and providing facilities required to accommodate increased use in coming years. 10/21/25 Written Public comment Save Coral Mt. 842 Topic: Specific Plan Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment 5-Halt the building of the proposed barrier fence- La Quinta Planning commission public comment 13 May Topic: Specific Plan Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment 5-Halt the building of the proposed barrier fence Speaker: Mary Mann 80451 Palatine Ct La Quinta CA 92253 mobile 775-527-8963 maryhpmann@gmail.com Thank you for the opportunity to speak to the Commission this afternoon regarding the Development that is proceeding under Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment 5-the West Phase called the Club at Coral Mountain. I am here to request that the Commission do its part to halt the construction of the Barrier Fence on the west side of the project and revisit the Specific Plan and associated Environmental Impact Report to account for the disturbance that the fence will cause for the natural environment and open space now enjoyed by generations of Coachella Valley residents and visitors. If La Quinta is the Gem of the desert, I'd like for our City to start planning to make Coral Mountain Regional Park the Gem of La Quinta. The West Phase of the project as now conceived has not received due consideration of its impacts and alternatives at the project boundaries particularly on the west side where it borders designated natural open space zoning, and federally protected Lands. We who now live adjacent to these lands have seen that activities have commenced with utilities and roads going in, flagging of the documented archeological and biological resources and staking of the proposed Fence. First the Final EIR that is referenced in the specific plan was not reconsidered after the addition of the Sheep Barrier Fence. Its location and construction were not considered in relation to the adjoining properties, current use, the hundreds of new neighbors that have been added to this part of La Quinta since the original project was conceived and reconceived over the past 28 years. The 8' fence was added to check a box with a solution that has been applied at the boundary with the Santa Rosa Mountains to the north in La Quinta with the notion of protecting Bighorn Sheep. The fences in other areas of La Quinta warranted a separate EIR and I challenge that this one should as well. The figures given in the Specific plan and description of the fence does not adequately describe how is expected to be effective, given the geomorphology of the area. The public, agencies, and surrounding landowners need to be given an honest opportunity to provide feedback on this element of the proposed project. I can offer a vision of interagency cooperation to continue to preserve these lands for the enjoyment and discovery of future generations. 843 Topic: Specific Plan Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment 5-Halt the building of the proposed barrier fence- La Quinta Planning commission public comment 13 May Second, I'd like the City to consider that the adjoining lands to this property are designated a Coral Mountain Regional Park on maps. This is heartening as there are significant archaeological sites, human history as well as the shoreline marked by Coral that it is named for. This area was a shoreline a lake as recently as the 1700s. The history back in to prehistoric and geologic time is fascinating and of interest to so many of our citizens. This area is currently used daily for recreation of all types hiking, climbing, horseback riding, camping, OTV use. The free access to our natural spaces has been eroded all along the mountain front. The public --citizens old and those who have been attracted here by the desert open space --has not been adequately informed of this pending loss of access open space, cultural and natural resources. My intent is to continue to dig into the history of this project and find other residents, groups, and new neighbors, and old who have an interest in working with the developer, the City and other adjoining landholders to ensure that the future residents we are hoping to fill these homes will be connected. I am raising a child here and want him to experience and share the wonder that this desert has to offer. It's why we chose La Quinta. Outside developers have the resources to check the administrative boxes, but La Quinta has the obligation to truly consider the actions that are taken and how the proposed project will impact us as a community. Please stop the Barrier Fence indicated in Specific Plan 03-067. It is a small part of this project, but how this boundary with the Wilderness is implemented will impact us that remain for 40 years and beyond and set the stage for how the continued management of these designated open spaces connect us to our larger community and heritage. end 2 844 La Quinta City Council 3 June 2025-Public Comment Items not on agenda Topic: Recall Specific Plan Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment 5-Halt the building of the proposed barrier fence and plan for public recreation Speaker: Mary Mann 80451 Palatine Ct La Quinta CA 92253 mobile 775-527-8963 maryhpmann@gmail.com Coral Mountain should be the Gem of La Quinta and gateway to the Santa Rosa Wilderness area. There is a wonderful opportunity here for the City of La Quinta and its leadership to engage with the surrounding landowners and stakeholders including a new community of residents that now lives in south La Quinta. I want to see my City take a good look at this area south of Avenue 54, how it has grown and changed under the current general plan and what will be needed for the future. The City can lead to encourage development that allows for and embraces the natural environment, allowing for enjoyment and access to the Wilderness on our western boundary that so many of us crave. This is in direct alignment with the City Mission Statement and several of the Goals set forth in the Strategic Plan. The area in question is a local haunt for seeking solace in the desert, hiking, mountain biking, walking dogs, playing, flying, hot air balloon launches! It is accessed by increasing numbers of people, noticeable even in the few years since we moved in. There is character and solidarity we are building in this neighborhood and community, despite being behind walls and being >6 miles from any City amenities. Once the Developer leaves we are in blocks of isolated homes, all responsible for our own maintenance. This may look good on paper at the outset, but it is ultimately damaging to our bottom line, community, and quality of life. The risks associated with water supply, natural disasters, maintenance of infrastructure that will be borne directly bythe City, CVWD, IID, County of Riverside and our neighbors in Indio and the City Sphere of influence as well as the ultimate new homeowners in the community. These are long-term ongoing costs and risks that have not been considered. Take the time and effort to develop plans for how our City will interface with natural open space, providing low impact benefits to citizens and visitors. These efforts in community building and allowing the public, stakeholder agencies and groups to create a plan that could make Coral Mountain the Gem of La Quinta will be rewarded in civic pride and attraction to the area. I point to numerous new events such as the Iron Man, which will attract lovers of sport and the outdoors. How can we provide ways for these events to continue and host these visitors in such a way that they will want to come back or stay? 845 One way is to provide amenities that are accessible and open to the public. Places for people to get out, explore, experience the desert, have a picnic, take a hike, ride a bike. A few other comments I have sent to Recreation District President and Manager: I am writing to get information on the status and plans for the Coral Mountain Regional Park. From what I have been able to glean online whatever plans for this new DRD community resource have been stalled and the BOR agreement it is tied to may be expiring. La Quinta is going forward with building private golf course development under a specific plan amendment that was soundly opposed by the community at the time. Under the plan for the new development, there are several references to the pending DRD park facility as mitigation of the adding of people, infrastructure and cutting off of public access for recreation. Despite this, there did not seem to be any partnership opportunity extended to the DRD to create a facility that will accommodate the needs of this part of the District and City of La Quinta. The one agreement that DRD signed with the developer to build a trail would be negated if the BOR agreement expires. This would mean the loss of the one concession the developer was asked to provide to maintain even minimal access to the public to lands that have been identified as unique in many respects, geologically, ecologically, have historically and currently provided desert recreation opportunities for the whole Valley and beyond. In particular an 8' high fence that received no vetting on its effectiveness for the stated purpose of protecting sheep and its path ignores the unique archaeological and ecological features it would bisect. Damage to this would have a detrimental effect on the planned conservation efforts of DRD that are revealed in the initial planning for the Coral Mountain Park. We have added hundreds of people to this part of the Valley (South La Quinta, Indio) in only a few years with many new private developments but the Cities (La Quinta in particular) have not been compelled to provide any public recreation facilities or even planned for these. There does not seem to be any planning for maintaining access around Coral Mountain for exploration and entering into the Santa Rosa Wilderness. We desperately need to get an integrated plan together. There are many agencies involved, DRD, City of La Quinta, Indio, Riverside County, BLM, BOR, CVWD, IID, Tribes. 846 Riverside County and partners are investing a lot into upgrades to the Lake Cahuilla Park. I have not seen that La Quinta has been proactive at all in planning for new recreational visitors to the area. We truly need a facility that would be the Gatewayto the Santa Rosa wilderness and offer a trail head, picnic and staging area, parking, restrooms. This is already a popular area for mountain biking, hiking, horseback riding, exploration of the archaeological and historical artifacts, discovery of desert fauna and flora, off-roading, climbing, dog -walking, horseback riding, prayer and reflection. The use of the area around Coral Mountain has increased dramatically even in the short time I have lived in this particular spot in the Valley. It is now critically important that the District bring this Coral Mountain Regional Park project back to the top of the list. So reaching out to you to see if you may see a way to activate discussions in the District and with other government entities to plan for development of the Coral Mountain Regional park, or find other groups, citizens who can assist in opening a dialogue around planning for saving of our existing desert recreation opportunities at Coral Mountain and Santa Rosa Wilderness and providing facilities required to accommodate increased use in coming years. 847 La Quinta City Council 20 May 2025-Public Comment Items not on agenda Topic: Specific Plan Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment 5-Halt the building of the proposed barrier fence Speaker: Mary Mann 80451 Palatine Ct La Quinta CA 92253 mobile 775-527-8963 maryhpmann@gmail.com It is a pleasure to be able to address you today Mayor Evans. My purpose in speaking today is to elevate the Council's attention to the planned development at the current edge of the City where it interfaces with public land. I made a public statement last week and received assistance from staff to help me understand some of the history of the matter. I am doing my best to get up to speed. In the digging I have done so far I have realized that there is a wonderful opportunity here for the City of La Quinta and its leadership to engage with the surrounding landowners and stakeholders including a new community of residents that now lives in this area. I have found that the underpinning EIR that paved the way for the ultimate approval of the Specific Plan that the golf course developer is working under to be inadequate on a number of points, including that it was not recompleted after significant changes, one of which was the proposed fence. The so called sheep fence in particular should have received its own EIR considering its construction would mean the destruction or impact on documented cultural, historic and natural resource. There is a path for the City to recall the approval of the specific plan and request that certain aspects be reconsidered. I want to see my City take a good look at this area of La Quinta, how it has grown and changed under the current general plan, and how the City can lead the change to encourage development that allows for and embraces the natural environment, and enjoyment and access to the Wilderness that so many of us crave. This Coral Mountain should be the Gem of La Quinta and gateway to the Santa Rosa Wilderness area. We do not have any facilities like this on this end of the Valley. The area in question has become a local haunt for walking dogs, playing, flying Hot air balloon launches weekly! This is the character we are building in this neighborhood and community. Once the builders leave we have left ourselves with blocks of isolated communities, all responsible for their own maintenance. This may look good on paper at the outset, but it is ultimately damaging to our bottom line, community and quality of life. The risks associated with natural disasters, damage to infrastructure that will be borne directly by the City, CVWD, IID, County of Riverside and our neighbors in Indio and the City 848 Sphere of influence as well as the ultimate new homeowners in the community. These are long-term ongoing costs and risks that have not been considered. My desire to stop a fence from being installed at west boundary of the Club at Coral Mountain development is manifold all stemming from a deep love of this place that has grown deeper in the 2 years I have spent here. The history, the ecosystem -in the true sense (not the cheap way it seems to be bandied in our speech today). Ecosystem of soils, and bugs, and birds, bats rabbits coyotes, hundreds of documented species, the twisty holes host a bee hive here. The striking line of the tufa is a remnant of Lake Cahuilla on whose shorelines a history human of interaction with the environment is also recorded. Trees growing heartly from crevasses they have created, breaking down the rocks along with the wind small rain and powerful hurricanes as experienced with Hilary only 2 years ago. The boulders fallen loose from the mountains as they tumble down and then moved . It's astounding when you stand there next to them and contemplate the power of the waters that moved them. This is not the past. It is an ongoing natural and human story. The City should embrace these spaces, not see as an adversary, and concerns over transitions from manicured to natural spaces, but take a nod from other desert cities, and integrate the development within the natural landscape. As La Quinta considers development over top of these precious resources, and history of failed attempts, I would like us to find an integrated way to take advantage of the unique features of this landscape and keep us out of harms when the inevitable comes again. There is 640 acre tract set aside as a Park. It looks to be stagnant. The Recreation District who began the investigation to this and have an agreement with the Bureau of Reclamation who controls the land should be an integral part of the development plans presented by the developer and development of the general and specific plan that covers this area. We should be looking to engage with developers to create a vision that can contribute to the long term well-being of the City. A developer who has a willingness not to check the boxes but to work with the surrounding community and the City to create something that we can be proud to call home. Take the time, effort it takes to develop these plans for how our City will interface with its open spaces, providing low impact benefits to citizens and visitors. These efforts in community building and allowing the public, stakeholder agencies and groups to create a plan that could make Coral Mountain the Gem of La Quinta. It will be rewarded in civic pride and attraction to the area. I point to numerous new events such as the Iron Man, which will attract lovers of sport and the outdoors. How can we provide ways for these events to continue and host these visitors in such a way that they will want to come back. 849 Looking into this actually addresses the Strategic How about more camping, a staging area, community center or retreat center where events can be hosted? The Vision is La Quinta Gem of the Desert, Coral Mountain, Gem of La Quinta, Gateway to the Santa Rosa Wilderness. Desert Recreation District can revive an effort for a park here. The developer of this property should work directly with the recreation district and the City to determine what will be the best boundary with this private development. It may take another change in plans. The EIR that underpins Specific Plan should be revisited. There is an opportunity for creating a renowned recreation area with the City as a key partner. I am dismayed that even as the City is in the midst of a failed development that has scarred our landscape, increased dust, paid for a street that is not open to the public, and restricted our access to the Santa Rosa Wilderness all along its border. That a plan that has required 2 changes to the general plan and a rejection by the planning commission, would then be so quicky accepted. Another EIR should have been required. Why not neighborhoods with access through them to our open space? 1)Love The thing is I enjoy accessing the Santa Rosa wilderness and I have experienced the wonder and beauty of this place and am grateful to watch the sunrise over this valley as many morning as I can. I've realised that it is an integrated Mountin In the digging I have been able to do. WE moved into the neighborhood in 2022, just when the Planning commission rehjected the wave park specific plan. I breatheed a sigh of relief. I enjoy this area daily. :e] La Quinta Arts and Community Services Commission Public Comment 9 June 2025 Topic: South La Quinta growth -Coral Mountain park and trails Written Comments: Mary Mann 80451 Palatine Ct La Quinta CA 92253 mobile 775-527-8963 maryhpmann@gmail.com Thank you for the opportunity to offer public comments to the La Quinta Arts and Community Services Commission. I am a resident of south La Quinta who is daily inspired artistically, academically, physically, emotionally and spiritually in our desert and am so grateful to be living here and have access to the outdoors. I look forward to enjoying many more years here with new discovery every day and sharing with my son as he grows. Hundreds of new homes in walled private developments have been added in the past several years in south La Quinta and the building continues. As a result more and more people (me included) are using areas of the City that have been lightly used in the past. As residents continue to populate this area they are discovering Coral Mountain the Gem of La Quinta and gateway to the Santa Rosa Wilderness. This is an area for hiking and other outdoor pursuits and provides access to the Santa Rosa Wilderness. This area is used daily, weekly, seasonally, by immediate neighbors, other Coachella Valley residents, and regional visitors for all kinds of recreation. Without planning there will be a crisis soon, where we may be cutting off our access to open space, enjoyment of our natural environment, places to walk our dogs, ride bikes, ride horses, climb, take in the quiet, discover the desert, see wildlife, and be inspired. The County is also upgrading the Lake Cahuilla park that was featured in the Gem magazine this month, further adding the interest in south La Quinta as an outdoor recreation hub. The City needs to plan on the demand for and use of the access points, trails, and natural space in south La Quinta. I have submitted written comments at recent City Council (20 May, 2 June) and Planning Commission (May 13) meetings regarding development around Coral Mountain. I would like to get the City engaged in the effort to create an integrated plan and particularly to continue to allow open access to Coral Mountain for discovery and interpretation of its unique ecological, geological, archaeological and historical stories. To be done right it will require engagement with the public, other agencies, landowners and potential developers covering the whole area, not piecemeal around the Mountain. So many current users here have a deep connection to the area, are dismayed with the potential loss of access, and see a better way to develop this area. In my observations on foot of this area over the past 3 years, the `Coral Mountain loop' would be a welcome addition to the La Quinta hiking map including designated trail heads on Avenue 58 and Avenue 60. This loop would showcase our unique desert environment. On the east side of Coral Mountain the trail would highlight the tufa formation that reveals the shoreline of the historic Lake Cahuilla and the archaeological features that show how well loved and used this area has been for at least many hundreds of years. The current plan seems to be to put a fence directly through these unique features to accommodate the requirements of a large private golf course development. The fence location and construction on the west boundary of the development were not considered in relation to identified sensitive ecological and archaeological features that should be respected. Other considerations that were not included are the preferred use planned for adjoining properties (park and open space), current use (park and open space), Bureau of Reclamation and CWVD infrastructure, nor the hundreds of new neighbors that have been added to this part of La Quinta since the original project was conceived and reconceived over the past 28+ years. 851 La Quinta Arts and Community Services Commission Public Comment 9 June 2025 Times have changed, plans need to change. The fence idea needs to be ditched and a comprehensive plan for conservation around Coral Mountain and connection to the Wilderness boundary should be created. This one private golf course development threatens to add another 750 residential units to the northeast side of Coral Mountain, which will further increase the use of the surrounding natural space and access to the Santa Rosa Wilderness. (New homes=new residents and visitors who do not stay behind walls). Community services that are consistently demanded (when we are asked) are more parks, hiking, walking trails, access to open space. While the current developer of the property east of Coral Mountain made some promises regarding the building of a trail on the west boundary, this is not an integrated plan that links the current use with the future needs. La Quinta, perhaps through this this committee, should be working directly with any developer and other stakeholder groups to ensure that the Community Service needs of current and future residents and visitors are taken into account. Please feel free to contact me. I am new to the conversation but so want to be a part of it if there are avenues to get involved. "off Connection ��r'. _~y~.r.- •sue : � -- � ...,� 1 y _ M Figure 1: Concept for establishing the hiking route around Coral Mountain. end 2 852 Topic: Specific Plan Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment 5-Halt the proposed barrier fence and plan for outdoor recreation and conservation around and on Coral Mountain - La Quinta Planning commission public comment 10 June Topic: Alternative planning options for Coral Mountain corridor to align with City Vision, Mission and Goals Speaker: Mary Mann 80451 Palatine Ct La Quinta CA 92253 mobile 775-527-8963 maryhpmann@gmail.com This is my second time offering public comment to this Commission regarding this topic. The mitigation measures that are included in the Specific Plan Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment 5 in treatment Cultural, Historical and Unique features are not adequate. Below is a sketch of some alternative Community amenities that speak to La Quinta's mission statement from our strategic plan: "As the "Gem of the Desert," the City of La Quinta is committed to enhancing its unique natural surroundings for the benefit of its residents through support for the arts and culture, public safety, affordable housing, sustainable fiscal and environmental guidelines, multi -racial and multi -generational activities and events, and preservation of its ancient and recent history. The land uses suggested in the image below and align with many of specific values and goals that are throughout the current General Plan. These alternative uses could be aligned with the new development and the private developer could support creation of these new public spaces that show a long term investment in the Community and commitment to the overall health of La Quinta. Including the written comments submitted to the Art and Community Services Commission yesterday. 853 _' qI Topic: Specific Plan Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment 5-Halt the proposed barrier fence and plan for outdoor recreation and conservation around and on Coral Mountain - La Quinta Planning commission public comment 10 June "`! I Camping, staging area trailhead, picnicareas Coral M15'6ntain Loop Trailandopenspacehe'a Boo Hoff Connection Santa Rosa Wilderness !W (74 ;`I z- ` 'N" ISO - Figure 1: Sketch of alternative land uses adjacent to the boundaries of area covered in current SP 03-067 Amendment 5- This makes Coral Mountain as a centerpiece and envisions connectivity around the entire geologic feature and the Santa Rosa Wilderness. Additional parks, open space, and public facilities will enhance Community connection, allow for sharing of our unique history recent and ancient with residents and visitors alike, provide public spaces for hosting of outdoor events, retreats, educational opportunities. end 2 854 La Quinta Arts and Community Services Commission Public Comment 9 June 2025 Topic: South La Quinta growth -Coral Mountain park and trails Written Comments: Mary Mann 80451 Palatine Ct La Quinta CA 92253 mobile 775-527-8963 maryhpmann@gmail.com Thank you for the opportunity to offer public comments to the La Quinta Arts and Community Services Commission. I am a resident of south La Quinta who is daily inspired artistically, academically, physically, emotionally and spiritually in our desert and am so grateful to be living here and have access to the outdoors. I look forward to enjoying many more years here with new discovery every day and sharing with my son as he grows. Hundreds of new homes in walled private developments have been added in the past several years in south La Quinta and the building continues. As a result more and more people (me included) are using areas of the City that have been lightly used in the past. As residents continue to populate this area they are discovering Coral Mountain the Gem of La Quinta and gateway to the Santa Rosa Wilderness. This is an area for hiking and other outdoor pursuits and provides access to the Santa Rosa Wilderness. This area is used daily, weekly, seasonally, by immediate neighbors, other Coachella Valley residents, and regional visitors for all kinds of recreation. Without planning there will be a crisis soon, where we may be cutting off our access to open space, enjoyment of our natural environment, places to walk our dogs, ride bikes, ride horses, climb, take in the quiet, discover the desert, see wildlife, and be inspired. The County is also upgrading the Lake Cahuilla park that was featured in the Gem magazine this month, further adding the interest in south La Quinta as an outdoor recreation hub. The City needs to plan on the demand for and use of the access points, trails, and natural space in south La Quinta. I have submitted written comments at recent City Council (20 May, 2 June) and Planning Commission (May 13) meetings regarding development around Coral Mountain. I would like to get the City engaged in the effort to create an integrated plan and particularly to continue to allow open access to Coral Mountain for discovery and interpretation of its unique ecological, geological, archaeological and historical stories. To be done right it will require engagement with the public, other agencies, landowners and potential developers covering the whole area, not piecemeal around the Mountain. So many current users here have a deep connection to the area, are dismayed with the potential loss of access, and see a better way to develop this area. In my observations on foot of this area over the past 3 years, the `Coral Mountain loop' would be a welcome addition to the La Quinta hiking map including designated trail heads on Avenue 58 and Avenue 60. This loop would showcase our unique desert environment. On the east side of Coral Mountain the trail would highlight the tufa formation that reveals the shoreline of the historic Lake Cahuilla and the archaeological features that show how well loved and used this area has been for at least many hundreds of years. The current plan seems to be to put a fence directly through these unique features to accommodate the requirements of a large private golf course development. The fence location and construction on the west boundary of the development were not considered in relation to identified sensitive ecological and archaeological features that should be respected. Other considerations that were not included are the preferred use planned for adjoining properties (park and open space), current use (park and open space), Bureau of Reclamation and CWVD infrastructure, nor the hundreds of new neighbors that have been added to this part of La Quinta since the original project was conceived and reconceived over the past 28+ years. 855 La Quinta Arts and Community Services Commission Public Comment 9 June 2025 Times have changed, plans need to change. The fence idea needs to be ditched and a comprehensive plan for conservation around Coral Mountain and connection to the Wilderness boundary should be created. This one private golf course development threatens to add another 750 residential units to the northeast side of Coral Mountain, which will further increase the use of the surrounding natural space and access to the Santa Rosa Wilderness. (New homes=new residents and visitors who do not stay behind walls). Community services that are consistently demanded (when we are asked) are more parks, hiking, walking trails, access to open space. While the current developer of the property east of Coral Mountain made some promises regarding the building of a trail on the west boundary, this is not an integrated plan that links the current use with the future needs. La Quinta, perhaps through this this committee, should be working directly with any developer and other stakeholder groups to ensure that the Community Service needs of current and future residents and visitors are taken into account. Please feel free to contact me. I am new to the conversation but so want to be a part of it if there are avenues to get involved. "off Connection ��r'. _~y~.r.- •sue : � -- � ...,� 1 y _ M Figure 1: Concept for establishing the hiking route around Coral Mountain. end 2 856 ATTACHMENT 4 City of La Qu i nta PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO.1 PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING October 28, 2025 STAFF REPORT AGENDA TITL- : CONSIDER ADOPTING A RESOLUTION TO APPROVE TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 TO ALLOW THE SUBDIVISION OF THE 384 ACRE SITE, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GOLF COURSE, PERIMETER LANDSCAPE, AND SALES CENTER WITHIN THE CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB PROJECT; CEQA: THE APPLICATIONS ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT EIR (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310) AND NO FURTHER REVIEW IS REQUIRED; PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB; LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET RECOMMENDATION • Consider adopting a resolution to approve Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), Site Development Permit 2025-0001, and Site Development Permit 2025- 0002 for the Coral Mountain Club Project, allowing the subdivision of the entire site and the development of the golf course, perimeter landscaping, and sales center and make a finding that the proposed applications are consistent with the Coral Mountain Resort EIR. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan (SP 03-067) was amended in 2024 to modify the layout, development standards, and design guidelines for the west half of the Specific Plan area (west of Madison Street). This portion of the Specific Plan is now referred to as Coral Mountain Club (Attachment 1). • The Specific Plan allows up to 750 dwelling units, a golf course, and a commercial corner on the 384-acre site. • An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified by Council on March 5, 2024 (Resolution No. 2024-007), which analyzed the development of the Specific Plan as approved. • The current Tentative Tract Map (TTM) and Site Development Permits (SDP) are the first implementing applications for the approved Specific Plan Amendment (Attachment 2). 857 • In order to make a recommendation for approval of the project, the Planning Commission must: 1) Make findings and apply the Conditions of Approval (COAs) in support of the TTM and SDPs (Attachment 3) BACKGROUND/ANALYSIS The Specific Plan Amendment for the Coral Mountain Club established the parameters for the build -out of the western half of the Andalusia project, including up to 750 residential units, an 18-hole golf course and its ancillary facilities (clubhouse, maintenance yard, driving range, etc.), and a 7± acre site for neighborhood commercial development. The three applications now under consideration are the first implementation tools for that Specific Plan. The applications consist of: o A TTM to subdivide the 384± acres into 204 residential lots (including three lots that may be further subdivided in the future for additional single-family or condominium units), one commercial lot, as well as lots for the golf course, streets, and ancillary facilities. o An SDP to allow the development of the golf course, and the perimeter landscaping and walls. The latter are required to be in the first phase of development per the original approval. The golf course SDP consists only of the golf course landscaping plans. In the coming months, an application for the golf course buildings, including the clubhouse, golf maintenance yard, and other ancillary structures, will be submitted to the Commission for review. o An SDP to allow the construction of a sales center for the homes. Typically, a Minor Use Permit (MUP) is processed for a model home complex and sales office/center for a duration of two years. In this case, however, the applicant proposes that the sales center be in place for the entire build -out of the tract and anticipates that this will be longer than an MUP would allow. When the applicant was preparing the two SDPs, it became evident that the landscape plant palette included in the Specific Plan was too restrictive and monotonous. As a result, the applicant requested a Director's Decision, as allowed in the Specific Plan, to expand the landscape palette. That was reviewed and approved and is the basis for the two SDP landscape designs. For ease of review, it is provided as Attachment 4. Each of the three applications is described individually below, and based on the analysis provided, the findings for approval of each application can be made (Attachment 3). Tentative Tract Map The TTM (Attachment 5) subdivides the entire 384± acres into 202 single-family lots, three residential lots (Lots 202, 203, and 204) for future additional subdivision, potentially for condominium use, one lot for future commercial development (Lot 205), as well as lettered lots for the golf course and private streets, and additional lots for ancillary facilities. All of the single-family lots will back onto the golf course and will be accessed by a system of interior private streets. It is expected that the TTM will be phased, as shown on page 1 of Attachment 5, although the phasing sequence may change based on market conditions. The TTM has been designed in accordance with the City's Subdivision Ordinance and is conditioned to implement project -wide improvements, including perimeter streets (Exhibit A of the Resolution). SDP 2025-0001 (Golf Course & Perimeter Landscape) The SDP Plan Set (Attachment 6) is divided into two sections: the golf course landscape plan and the perimeter landscape and wall/fence plans. Golf Course Design The golf course encompasses 182± acres of the 384± acre site. It wraps around through the property, with the residential lots separating the golf layout. The primary premise of the design is that areas outside of golf play will be landscaped to resemble the desert environment, in a fashion sometimes described as a "links course." Generally, the golf course is situated at elevations lower than the residential lots, providing panoramic views throughout the site. The landscape plan has been designed in "Zones" consistent with the Specific Plan Landscape Zones. Each Zone corresponds to a landscape style and environment designed to provide unique features and planting plans. Zone A includes a "Sub -Zone" which restricts plantings along the western 50-foot perimeter to plants allowed under the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan, and which are not toxic to Peninsular Bighorn Sheep. Due to the scale involved in such a large landscape plan, the proposed plantings include the species, variety, size, and quantity of plants within each Zone (pages 14 through 18 of Attachment 6), and a typical planting plan is provided on page 19 of Attachment 6. The specifics associated with planting details will be provided in the Final Landscape Plan, which will be required prior to the construction and installation of the golf course. Staff has reviewed the landscape plan and believes that the quantities and distribution are consistent with the quality of landscaping envisioned in the Specific Plan. Between the golf holes, native species and soils will be designed to mimic the desert environment, utilizing native soils and decomposed granite. No turf is proposed, and the project is conditioned to apply a clear soil stabilizer to prevent blowing sand (Condition 81, Exhibit B of the Resolution). The golf course design includes the preservation of the existing adobe on the site, which will be protected in place and fenced (page 22 of Attachment 6). The adobe will be maintained by the homeowners' association or the golf club in the long term, and will be open to residents and their guests only. This area, and several culturally sensitive areas along Coral Mountain, have been designated "Environmentally Sensitive Areas" (ESA) on the TTM and will be protected from grading and construction activity. The ESAs on the southwest corner of the property are provided to protect the Native American rock art and other culturally sensitive features at the toe of slope of Coral Mountain. The Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) has participated in the creation of these ESAs, and is S • currently reviewing the Rock Art Management Plan for the long term protection of these resources. The Rock Art Management Plan will determine how these resources will be protected in the long term, including fencing if determined necessary. In addition, the existing de facto trail along the base of Coral Mountain will be preserved and enhanced on the project site. The surface and plantings will continue to be native plants, sand and gravel, as they currently occur, and must remain open on either end for continued public access. As required in the Conditions of Approval (COAs), the trail must be installed and completed within 60 days of golf course completion. It is important to note that the trail continues north and south of the property, on land owned by third parties, and that neither the City nor the applicant has authority to maintain or improve those portions of the trail that are not within the boundaries of the project. Perimeter Landscaping The second half of the SDP Plan Set is the perimeter landscaping and wall/fence plan. It features a 10-foot trail, consistent with the City's multi -use trail design, along the Avenue 58 and Madison Street roadway frontages, which meanders through a landscaped parkway. Avenue 60 will include a curb -adjacent sidewalk and landscaped parkway. The outer edge of the parkway will be marked by a 6-foot high stucco wall, which will be broken up with a stone veneer finish (see pages L3.01 and L3.02 of Attachment 6). The stucco finish can extend up to 920 linear feet, while the stone accent portions will range from 121 to 161 feet in length, and will be inset a depth of 6 feet, to provide visual relief (see page L3.02 of Attachment 6), and take the place of pilasters, which are not proposed. The wall will occur on all sides of the site, except for the west and southwest boundary, which are required to be bordered by a fence to prevent access to Peninsular Bighorn Sheep, who have been sighted frequently on Coral Mountain. The design of the fence will be 8 feet in height and will consist of posts and mesh in a design acceptable to the City and California Department of Fish and Wildlife. The landscape plan for the parkway consists of a mix of desert -friendly species to include trees for shade, a variety of shrubs, and a gravel cover, which will be planted in an informal style, as shown on pages L4.01 through L4.04 of Attachment 6. SDP 2025-0002 (Sales Center) The Sales Center Plan Set (Attachment 7) provides the design of the modular buildings and landscaping for the 1.2-acre site. As described above, it is expected that the build - out of the project, including construction of the golf course and sales of the homes, will take several years. The SDP was requested by the applicant to allow the project to gain market visibility during the golf course construction period, to allow "pre -sales," and to continue through the project's build -out. As shown on the site plan (page 3 of Attachment 7), the site will be located immediately north of the permanent entry gate, and immediately south of the future commercial parcel. Access will be taken directly from Madison Street until such time as the main project entry is constructed, at which time the Madison Street driveway must be removed, and access will be taken from the main entry drive. Madison Street includes sufficient width to allow e right -in -right -out only access. The location is reasonably straight and has good sight distance for those entering and leaving the site. The site features a nine -space parking area and a two -building sales center with a central patio, surrounded by an olive grove. The two buildings will be 12 feet in height and consist of simple architecture that will be largely hidden from public view by the distance from Madison Street and the intervening landscaping. The buildings are proposed to be tan in color with black accents. One building will serve as the sales center, and the other as office space. The landscaping is proposed to create a garden setting, featuring large olive trees proposed in close planting throughout the site. Shrubs and ground covers will continue the theme established for the project by the Specific Plan. Outside lighting will be positioned low to the ground and will be of low intensity. Public Agency Review All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Design and Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated into the recommended COAs. Oublic Hearing Notice The public hearing notice for the project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 17, 2025, and distributed to properties within 500 feet of the site. At the time of publication of the Agenda, Staff had received one written comment (Attachment 8). ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design & Development Department reviewed the project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and found that the project is consistent with the previously adopted EIR (EA 2019-0010, SCH#2021020310) and requires no further environmental review, pursuant to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, for the following reasons: 1. There have been no substantial changes to the project that would require major revisions to the previously certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The TTM and two SDPs are consistent with the certified EIR for the project (SCH #2021020310), insofar as the EIR analyzed up to 750 residential units, a golf course, and a commercial corner. In this case, the TTM significantly reduces the number of residential units, even with the potential for three condominium lots to be further subdivided in the future. The project, as proposed, will reduce the effects and impacts analyzed in the EIR. 2. Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions to the previously certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The TTM and two SDPs do not change the development pattern analyzed in the EIR, nor have conditions changed on or around the project site, which could increase the impacts of the proposed project. The reduction in the number of housing units and the design of the golf course as a "links style" course reduce impacts related to traffic and water demand, among others, and all of the mitigation measures included in the certified EIR are being implemented. 3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known or could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, showing that the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR, significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR, or mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously found not to be feasible or that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previously certified EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponent declines to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. The EIR was certified in 2024, and no new information or change in impacts has occurred since that time. The project, as proposed, will reduce the intensity of development on the project site and will not increase any of the impacts analyzed in the EIR. No mitigation measures are proposed to change as a result of the project. With the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in the EIR and the Conditions of Approval attached to the Resolution, there will be no change in the impacts to the environment, and no subsequent environmental review is required. Prepared by: Nicole Sauviat Criste, Consulting Planner Approved by: Cheri Flores, Interim Design and Development Director Attachment: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Vicinity Map Project Information Findings Andalusia Specific Plan Amendment No Tentative Tract Map 39058 SDP 2025-0001 Plan Set SDP 2025-0002 Plan Set Public Comment 5 Plant Palette PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025 — XXX A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND TWO SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A GOLF COURSE, PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AND SALES CENTER FOR THE CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB, AND FIND THAT THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310) AND REQUIRES NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, CONSISTENT WITH CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 CASE NUMBERS: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB APPLICANT: CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT LLC WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on October 28, 2025, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by CM Wave Development, LLC for approval of a Tentative Tract Map for the subdivision of 384± acres into 204 residential lots, one commercial lot, as well as lots for golf course and street purposes and two Site Development Permits for construction of the golf course, perimeter landscaping and sales center located at the southwest corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street, within the Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan (SP 03-067 Amendment No. 5), more particularly described as: APNs: 764-840-021, 766-070-003, 766-070-006, 766-070-012, 766-070-014, 766-080- 001, 766-080-002, 66-080-004, 766-080-005, 764-210-007, 764-210-028 & 764210029 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 17, 2025, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site and emailed or mailed to all interested parties who have requested notification relating to the project; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310) was certified by City Council on March 5, 2024 (Resolution 2024-007), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which analyzed up to 750 units and a golf course; and PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 2OF7 WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes parameters for the consideration of projects when an EIR has been approved to determine whether subsequent environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed these parameters and finds that no further environmental review is required in this case because- 1 . There have been no substantial changes to the project that would require major revisions to the previously certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects because the EIR analyzed up to 750 residential units, a golf course, and a commercial corner. In this case, the Tentative Tract Map significantly reduces the number of residential units. The project, as proposed, will reduce the effects and impacts analyzed in the EIR. 2. Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions to the previously certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects because the Tentative Tract Map and two Site Development Permits do not change the development pattern analyzed in the EIR, nor have conditions changed on or around the project site. The reduction in the number of housing units and the design of the golf course as a "links style" course reduce impacts related to traffic and water demand, among others, and all of the mitigation measures included in the EIR are being implemented. 3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known or could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, showing that the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR, significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR, or mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously found not to be feasible or that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previously certified EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment. The EIR was certified in 2024, and no new information or change in impacts has occurred since that time. The project, as proposed, will reduce the intensity of development on the project site and will not increase any of the impacts analyzed in the EIR. No mitigation measures are proposed to change. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 3OF7 Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 13.12.130 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map: 1. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan and Specific Plan 03-067, as amended, and implements the residential, golf course, and commercial uses allowed in those documents. 2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, with the implementation of recommended Conditions of Approval. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The mitigation measures included in the Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310) will reduce impacts to less than significant levels, and the reduction in residential lots proposed in the Tract Map will further reduce impacts associated with the project. 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as the map will be required to comply with all laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality, and other public health issues both in this Map and in subsequent site development permits and other approvals necessary for development of the land. 5. The site of the proposed subdivision is suitable for the density and type of development proposed. The reduction of units from the maximum allowed in the Specific Plan is suitable for the subject property. 6. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 13 of the City's Subdivision Regulations Code, minimum lot area requirements, and other applicable provisions of Title 9 of the City's Municipal Code, Subdivision Map Act and Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment No. 5. 7. The design and improvements required for the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All roadway improvements, easements, if any, and surrounding improvements will be completed to City and Specific Plan standards. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 4OF7 Site Development Permit 2025-0001 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan 03-067, as amended, and furthers the goals of the Specific Plan to create a self- contained high -quality community with golf amenities and services. The proposed golf course design reduces the golf course water consumption by creating desert - friendly buffer areas that will enhance the visual character of the site. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City's Zoning Code in terms of site plan and landscaping. The Site Development Permit is compliant with the Specific Plan and Zoning Code's development standards, including standards for setbacks and landscaping requirements. 3. The La Quinta Design and Development Department has determined that this project is consistent with the certified Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310), insofar as the Environmental Impact Report analyzed up to 750 residential units, a golf course, and a commercial corner. In this case, the project consists of a golf course on 182 of the 384 acres, consistent with what was previously analyzed. The project, as proposed, will reduce the effects and impacts analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report. 4. The layout of the golf course is compatible and complementary to surrounding development, which includes golf courses to the north, east, and south. 5. The site design of the project is compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The proposed golf course will be of high quality and will incorporate a desert -friendly plant palette which is sensitive to biological resources. 6. The proposed project implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Zoning Code. The landscape palette is consistent with the Specific Plan's and the City's drought -tolerant landscaping requirements. o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 50F7 Site Development Permit 2025-0002 WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan 03-067, as amended, and furthers the goals of the Specific Plan to create a self- contained high -quality community with golf amenities and services. The proposed sales center will provide a highly landscaped, low-lying location offering future residential land sales surrounded by perimeter landscaping and project walls. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City's Zoning Code in terms of site plan and landscaping. The Site Development Permit is compliant with the Specific Plan and Zoning Code's development standards, including standards for setbacks, building height, and landscaping requirements. 3. The La Quinta Design and Development Department has determined that this project is consistent with the certified Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report for the project (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310), insofar as the Environmental Impact Report analyzed up to 750 residential units, a golf course, and a commercial corner. In this case, the project consists of a sales center located on land which will be developed for neighborhood commercial use in the future, and the sales center is consistent with an office use permitted in the Specific Plan. The project, as proposed, will reduce the effects and impacts analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report. 4. The sales center is compatible and complementary to surrounding developments, insofar as it provides a garden -like setting, limited construction, and compatible design to the surrounding golf course communities. 5. The site design of the project is compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The proposed sales center provides a highly landscaped, low -impact development that will facilitate the sales of homes within a limited area of the Specific Plan. 6. The proposed project implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Zoning Code. The landscape palette is consistent with the Specific Plan's and City's drought -tolerant landscaping requirements, while the low -profile buildings and central courtyard facilitate low -impact development of the site. 867 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 6OF7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the Planning Commission in this case. SECTION 2. That the above project was previously analyzed in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the City Council certified the Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310), and the proposed Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Permits are consistent with Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, insofar as conditions have not changed, impacts of the project are equivalent or less than those analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report, and no new information is known which would change the severity of impacts or require new mitigation measures.. SECTION 3. That it does hereby approve Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001, Site Development Permit 2025-0001, and Site Development Permit 2025-0002 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval [Exhibits A, B, and C]. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission, held on October 28, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: DOUG HASSETT, Chairperson City of La Quinta, California ., PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 7OF7 ATTEST: CHERI FLORES, Interim Design and Development Director City of La Quinta, California EXHIBIT A PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 1 of 30 C,FNFRAI 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Title 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Website at www.laquintaca.gov. 3. Tentative Tract Map 2022-0003 shall expire three years from the approval date in accordance with LQMC Section 13.12.150, unless recorded or granted a time extension pursuant to the requirements of LQMC Section 13.12.160. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit(s) by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design & Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) we PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 2 of 30 The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above -listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times, through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. 871 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 3 of 30 D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The inclusion in the Master Homeowners' Association (HOA) Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required. 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate, and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if the Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 9. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street rights -of - way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 11. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: 872 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 4 of 30 A. PUBLIC STREETS Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial) — No additional right-of- way dedication is required. 55 feet from the centerline of Madison Street for a total 110-foot ultimate developed right of way 2. Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial) — 55 feet from the centerline of Avenue 58 along the project boundary 3. Avenue 60 (Collector) — 40 feet from the centerline of Avenue 60 for a total 80-foot ultimate developed right-of-way. 4. Calle Conchita (Local Street) - No additional right-of-way dedication is required. 30 feet from the centerline of Calle Conchita for a total 60-foot ultimate developed right-of-way except for the 80-foot right-of-way portion connecting to Madison Street granted in a Grant of Easement and Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 2013-0360337, of Official Records dated July 26, 2013. 12. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street rights - of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 13. The private street rights -of -way to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS Property line shall be placed at the back of curb, similar to the layout shown on the tentative map and the typical street section shown on the tentative map. Use of smooth curves instead of angular lines at property lines is recommended. Streets "A" through "I" - Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one (1) side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited, and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 14. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 873 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 5 of 30 15. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 16. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights -of -way shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights -of -way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 17. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot -wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet (5) in width with the express written approval of IID. 18. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights - of -way as follows: A. Madison Street (Secondary Arterial) - 10-feet from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) - 10-feet from the R/W-P/L. C. Avenue 60 (Collector) - 10-feet from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth for a meandering wall design as approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages, including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 19. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 20. Direct vehicular access to Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita from lots with frontage along Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Tentative Tract Map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. 874 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 6 of 30 21. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 22. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted or recorded over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 23. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties And Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 24. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Where a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, it shall be installed in accordance with City standards. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 25. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses). A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Construct Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Madison Street frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 875 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 7 of 30 b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide for full access movements at the primary entry and restore the median landscaping. A left turn deceleration lane for the northbound traffic serving the main project entry shall provide a minimum of 150 feet of vehicle queuing as determined by the traffic study. c. Restripe southbound lanes to an 8-foot bike/cart lane, a 4-foot buffer lane, and two (2) 11-foot thru lanes or as approved by the City Engineer. 2) Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Widen the south side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the south side as specified in the General Plan to accommodate an 11-foot travel lane and an 8-foot shoulder, and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Avenue 58 frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 3) Avenue 60 (Collector): a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary plus a distance of 100± feet past the CVWD well site to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions, and extend improvements to connect to the existing easterly paved street segment. The north curb face shall be located 25 feet north of the centerline. Street PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 8 of 30 widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. A hammerhead or similar design shall be provided at the western terminus, per Fire Department approval. b. Construct a 6-foot-wide sidewalk 4) Calle Conchita a. Improve street within project boundary with paving and all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation, or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 5) The applicant shall install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and the project's main access prior to issuance of the 204tn building permit for a dwelling unit within the development per the traffic study or when warrants are met, whichever comes first. Applicant is responsible for 100% of the cost of designing and installing the traffic signal. The security bond shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant. 6) The applicant is responsible for 25% of the cost to design and install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 58. Applicant shall bond for 25% of the traffic signal. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Streets "A" through "I" — Construct internal streets per the approved layout shown on the tentative map and/or as approved by the City Engineer. Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one (1) side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 877 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 9 of 30 2) The location of driveways of corner lots shall not be located within the curb return and away from the intersection when possible. 26. The main gated entry on Madison Street shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length of 62 feet from the call box to the street; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -accepted vehicles. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1" = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turnaround out onto the main street from the gated entry. Pursuant to said condition, there shall be a minimum of 25 feet of width provided at the turnaround opening. Two (2) lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry; one (1) lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one (1) lane for visitors. The two (2) travel lanes shall be a minimum of 20 feet of total paved roadway surface or as approved by the Fire Department. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 27. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Collector 4.0" a.c /5.0" c.a.b. Secondary Arterial 4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 28. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two (2) years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six (6) months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six (6) months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current 878 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 10 of 30 production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. 29. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Madison Street (Primary Entry): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. B. Madison Street (Golf Course Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. C. Madison Street (Emergency Access): Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. D. Madison Street (just south of Avenue 58): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. E. Avenue 60 (South Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. F. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Westerly Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. G. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Easterly Access): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. 30. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 31. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 32. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 33. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and, in particular, the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. :• PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 11 of 30 B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required, including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans so that ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for accessible parking spaces or as approved by the City Engineer. One (1) van -accessible handicapped parking stall is required per eight (8) handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking spaces shall be a minimum of 26 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 34. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 35. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two (2) years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six (6) months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six (6) months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. ::t PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 12 of 30 36. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. 37. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. FINAL MAPS 38. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 39. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 40. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Engineer. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Mass Grading Plan 1" = 100' Horizontal B. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. PM 10 Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal D. Erosion Control Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal E. Hydrology Report (Plan submitted in Report Form) F. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through F to be submitted concurrently. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 13 of 30 G. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical H. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal I. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 "= 4' Vertical J. Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal NOTE: G through H to be submitted concurrently The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the Public Works Director. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. K. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200 feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants), and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1 foot (1') of cover or as established in the structural calculations and details, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements, including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building ::. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 14 of 30 floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements, and accessibility requirements. 41. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets, and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.laquintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 42. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved plans previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record (EOR) during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the FOR may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of Record Drawing submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 43. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIX) guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 44. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIX) entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 45. Prior to constructing any off -site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both Performance and Labor & Material Bonds, each valued at 100% of the cost of the off -site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 46. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 15 of 30 47. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed or secured prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 48. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this Tentative Tract Map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first -priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 40th Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit(s) related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 49. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 16 of 30 site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable TV improvements. 50. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. nRAnINVn 51. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 52. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 53. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a professional registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. An Erosion Control Plan showing Best Management Practices prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A Final WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California. ;89 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 17 of 30 F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report and shall be certified as being adequate by a Soils Engineer, or Engineering Geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish the security if it is expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 54. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping or stabilized with such other erosion control measures as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 55. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e., the slope at the back of the landscape lot), which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first 18 inches behind the curb. 56. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 57. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot (1') higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. Where compliance within the above -stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties, and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 58. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (05) from the elevations shown on the o PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 18 of 30 approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 59. Prior to the issuance of a building permit(s) for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. nRAINAr,F 60. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for Tract Map No. 39058, Coral Mountain Project (TTM2025-0001), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 61. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on -site during the 100- year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1-hour, 3-hour, 6-hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total runoff. 62. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 63. In the design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches (2") per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero (0) unless the applicant provides site -specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 64. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 19 of 30 sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 65. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 66. For on -site above -ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance -free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 67. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation that directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 68. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 69. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 70. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 71. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ.. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopment Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction, and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. -1 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 20 of 30 2. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project -specific WQMP shall be provided, which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. 3. The developer/owner shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 72. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 73. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures, including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 74. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 75. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located so as not to conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 76. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings, and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 21 of 30 the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 77. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 78. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots. 79. All new landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 80. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing, and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Manager determines extenuating circumstances exist that justify an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until they have been signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 81. The applicant or their agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 82. Prior to final approval of the installation of landscaping, the Landscape Architect of record shall provide the Design and Development Department a letter stating he/she has personally inspected the installation and that it conforms with the Final Landscaping Plans as approved by the City. 83. If staff determines during final landscaping inspection that adjustments are required in order to meet the intent of the Planning Commission's approval, the Planning Manager shall review and approve any such revisions to the landscape plan. e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 22 of 30 MAINTENANCE 84. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 85. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, multi -use trail, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 86. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 87. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect at the time the applicant submits an application for plan check and permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT 88. Fire Protection Water Supplies/Fire Flow - Prior to building permit issuance for new construction, the applicant shall provide documentation showing a water system capable of delivering the required fire flow. The minimum number of fire hydrants required, as well as the location and spacing of fire hydrants, shall comply with the Fire Code. 89. Fire Apparatus Access Roads — The minimum clear width of a fire apparatus access road is 24 feet. Where a center median or guard house is installed near an entrance/exit, the required access road width of 24 feet shall be provided on the incoming side. The outgoing side shall be not less than 16 feet wide. 90. Fire apparatus access and approved access walkways shall be provided to the recreational lake and the existing adobe structure from the streets within the tract. 91. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided to within 150 feet of all exterior portions of buildings unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department. For one - and two-family dwellings with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, this distance is permitted to be extended from 150 feet to 300 feet. 92. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads that exceed 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 23 of 30 93. Fire apparatus access roads serving commercial or residential development shall be designed, constructed, and maintained to support the imposed loads of RVC fire apparatus with a total weight of 80,000 pounds. Apparatus weight is distributed as 55,000 pounds on tandem rear axles and 25,000 pounds on the front axle. The surface shall be designed to provide all-weather driving capabilities. A letter or statement, wet -stamped and signed by a registered engineer, shall be provided on the plans certifying that any new road meets this 80,000, all-weather requirement. 94. Fire lane identification is required to restrict the parking of vehicles at various locations. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a plan shall be submitted to the Office of the Fire Marshal showing the method of identifying the fire lane. Reference Riverside County Fire Department Guideline OFM-01A. 95. Plans for the construction of the gates to be installed across the fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. 96. Electric gate openers shall comply with UL 325. In the event of loss of normal power to the gate operating mechanism, it shall be automatically transferred to a fail-safe mode, allowing the gate to be pushed open by a single firefighter without any other actions, knowledge, or manipulation of the operating mechanism being necessary and without the use of battery back-up power; this shall be noted on the plan. The manufacturer's specification sheet demonstrating compliance with this method of operation during power loss shall be provided or scanned directly onto the plan. Should the gate be too large or heavy for a single firefighter to open manually, a secondary source of power, by means of an emergency generator or a capacitor with enough reserve to automatically and immediately open the gate upon loss of primary power, shall be provided. 97. The gate control for electronic gates shall be operable by a Knox emergency override key switch (with mounting plate: model #3502 or #3503). The key switch shall be placed between 42" and 48" above the road surface at the right side of the access gate, within two feet (2') of the edge of the road. The key switch shall be readily visible and unobstructed from the fire lane leading to the gate. 98. New motorized gates shall also be equipped with optical receivers to allow emergency response personnel to remotely open the gate when the emergency vehicle approaches the gate. The receiver shall be located to maximize signal reception from an approaching RVC apparatus. Devices shall be compatible with RVC preemption devices. A functional test of the automatic opening equipment, witnessed by RVC-OFM, is required prior to final acceptance. 99. Building Construction Permit Review - Submittal of construction plans to the Fire Department will be required. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 24 of 30 when the Fire Department reviews these plans. These conditions will be based on the California Fire Code, California Building Code (CBC), and related codes/standards adopted at the time of construction plan submittal. 100. Fire Sprinkler System - All new commercial buildings and structures 3,600 square feet or larger shall be protected by a fire sprinkler system. Reference CFC 903.2 as amended by the County of Riverside 101. Residential Fire Sprinklers - Residential fire sprinklers are required in all one and two-family dwellings per the California Residential Code (CRC). Plans must be submitted to the Office of the Fire Marshal for review and approval prior to installation. Reference CRC 313.2 15. Fire Alarm and Detection System - A water flow monitoring system and/or fire alarm system may be required, as determined during building construction plan review. Reference CFC 903.4 and CFC 907.2 102. All one and two-family dwellings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the residence. Minimum numeral height shall be 4 inches (4") with a contrasting color. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 103. The trail located on the western boundary of the project shall be installed and completed, including fencing/walls and access point markers, 60 days following the completion of grading for the golf course. The Final Landscape Plan shall include details for planting, trail surface, and walls. 104. Prior to any ground disturbance in the project area, an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) shall be established around the existing adobe (Site 33-08388) in a location and to the specifications of the project archaeologist. The ESA shall be shown on the Final Map and recorded against the parcel. 105. The realignment and construction of Calle Conchita shall be completed in conjunction with the construction of the perimeter wall for the project site. The developer shall coordinate with the existing homeowner(s) to the west of the project site on Calle Conchita and ensure that safe access for residents and emergency services is maintained during all road construction activities. 106. The access driveway located immediately north of Lot AT shall be maintained for emergency access only and shall conform to Fire Department standards for such access points. 107. Prior to the occupancy of the first residence on the project site, and in conjunction with the creation of CC&Rs for the property, a preservation and maintenance plan, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 25 of 30 including interpretative signage, as determined appropriate, shall be prepared by the project archaeologist and included in the CC&Rs for the project site. The Homeowners' Association and/or Golf Course ownership shall be responsible for the long-term maintenance of the Adobe site. 108. Prior to any ground disturbance on any portion of the site, the developer shall provide the City with: a. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating compliance with burrowing owl and nesting bird requirements. b. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating completion of 2025 bat surveys, and results (presence or absence) of same. c. Letter from a qualified historian demonstrating the correct installation of fencing surrounding the adobe. d. Letters from a qualified archaeologist and Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Tribal Historic Preservation Officer confirming that all remediation, data recovery, and mitigation of identified sites and resources have been completed to their satisfaction. e. Letter(s) from ACBCI approving the Archaeological Treatment, Disposition and Monitoring Plan and the Rock Art Management Plan, with a copy of the approved plan attached. f. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified archaeologist and ACBCI for all ground disturbing activities. g. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified biologist and noise engineer. 109. The Final Landscaping Plan is to include: a. Demonstration of an average 30-foot setback from right-of-way to home structure on Madison Street and Avenue 58. b. The wall on Avenue 58 and Madison Street shall provide a weight of at least four (4) pounds per square foot of face area with no decorative cutouts or line - of -sight openings between shielded areas and the roadways. The barrier must present a solid face from top to bottom. Unnecessary openings or decorative cutouts shall not be made. All gaps (except for weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking. ;., PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 26 of 30 110. All construction plans to include in their notes: a. Paving installation activity shall not overlap with the architectural coating (building painting) activity. b. The contractor shall adhere to applicable measures contained in Table 1 of Rule 403, including, but not limited to: • All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. • The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three (3) times a day, preferably in the mid -morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are limited to 15 miles per hour or less. c. The following measures shall be incorporated into project plans and specifications as implementation of SCAQMD Rule 1113 (3): • Only "Low -Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)" paints (no more than 50 grams/liter (g/L) of VOC) consistent with SCAQMD Rule 1113 shall be used. BACM AQ-3: The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood -burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. 111. Burrowing owl surveys shall be performed by a qualified biologist, approved by the City, prior to any site disturbance activities. A minimum of two (2) surveys, occurring at least three (3) weeks apart, shall be completed in advance of any site disturbance activities. If disturbance activities are expected to start during the burrowing owl breeding season, three (3) surveys shall be completed. The final burrowing owl survey shall be completed within three (3) days prior to initiation of any site disturbance activities. The pre -construction survey shall be conducted in accordance with accepted protocol and the requirements specified in the CVMSHCP. Prior to construction, a qualified biologist will survey the construction area and an area up to 500 feet outside the project limits for burrows that could be used by burrowing owls. If the burrow is determined to be occupied, the burrow will be flagged, and a 160-foot diameter buffer will be established during the non - breeding season or a 250-foot diameter buffer during the breeding season. The buffer area will be staked and marked with flags. No development activities will be PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 27 of 30 permitted within the buffer zone until the young are no longer dependent on the burrow and have left the burrow. If the burrow is found to be unoccupied, the burrow will be made inaccessible to owls, and construction may proceed. If either a nesting or escape burrow is occupied, owls shall be relocated pursuant to accepted Wildlife Agency protocols. Determination of the appropriate method of relocation, such as eviction/passive relocation or active relocation, shall be based on the specific site conditions (e.g., distance to nearest suitable habitat and presence of burrows within that habitat) in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. If burrowing owls are observed within the Project site during construction activities, CDFW shall be notified immediately and provided with proposed avoidance and minimization measures, consistent with the requirements of the CVMSHCP. 112. Removal of trees (including palm trees) shall occur outside the bat maternity season (March 15—August 31 in the Coachella Valley), which coincides with the bird nesting season, to avoid the potential for "take" of flightless young. Trees and snags that have been identified as confirmed or potential roost sites require a two- step removal process and the involvement of a bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. Consistent with CDFW protocols, this two-step removal shall occur over two (2) consecutive days as follows: on Day 1, branches and limbs not containing cavities, as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a bat biologist. The disturbance caused by limb removal, followed by an interval of one (1) evening, will allow bats to safely abandon the roost. 113. To avoid impacts to roosting bats from the installation of new light fixtures associated with the proposed development, all lighting fixtures shall have light shields or similar devices (i.e., dark sky compliant lighting) installed to ensure that there is no light trespass onto Coral Mountain and the surrounding open space. A supplemental light study will be performed to collect nighttime lighting measurements and confirm that no light trespass onto Coral Mountain is occurring prior to occupancy of the first housing unit adjacent to Coral Mountain. 114. A qualified bat biologist shall confirm the absence of roosting bats prior to any restoration work or other disturbance of the adobe site. If bats are found or if the absence of bats cannot be confirmed, the bat biologist will install or directly supervise the installation of humane eviction devices and exclusionary material to prevent bats from roosting in the building. Implementation of the humane eviction/exclusions is typically performed in the Fall (September or October) preceding construction activity at each structure to avoid impacts to hibernating bats during the winter months or during the maternity season (March 15—August :•. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 28 of 30 31 in the Coachella Valley), when nonvolant (flightless) young are present. Any humane eviction/exclusion devices must be installed at least 10 days prior to the demolition of a structure housing bats to allow sufficient time for the bats to vacate the roost(s). 115. To ensure compliance with the California Fish and Game Code and the MBTA, and to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds, vegetation removal and ground - disturbing activities shall be conducted outside the general bird nesting season. Any vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and/or construction activities that occur during the nesting season will require that all suitable habitats be surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist who is pre -approved by the CDFW. Prior to commencement of clearing, a qualified biologist shall conduct pre -construction surveys within 14 days and repeated three (3) days prior to ground -disturbing activities. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) around the nest adjacent to construction will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. During construction activities, the qualified biologist shall continue biological monitoring activities at a frequency recommended by the qualified biologist, using their best professional judgment, or as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies. If nesting birds are detected, avoidance and minimization measures may be adjusted, and construction activities may be stopped or redirected by the qualified biologist using their best professional judgment as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies to avoid the "take" of nesting birds. 116. To ensure the project will avoid any significant construction noise impacts on wildlife using Coral Mountain, noise monitoring will be conducted for all construction activities using heavy equipment within 150 feet of the base of Coral Mountain. If noise levels exceed 75 dBA, construction operational changes or other project modifications shall be made, as directed by the project biologist, to reduce the noise levels at Coral Mountain to below 75 dBA. 117. A written plan for an educational program about the Peninsular bighorn sheep and their associated habitat shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of the first building permit for residential units on the property. The plan shall demonstrate how educational programs will be implemented and maintained throughout the resort, open space, and low -density community programs through the use of signage, pamphlets, and staff education. The Education Program should inform the reason why specific measures are being taken to support the recovery of Peninsular bighorn sheep. The Education Program should include the ecology of Peninsular bighorn sheep, threats this species currently faces, and how recovery actions will reduce these threats. This includes information that explains: (1) why restrictions on toxic plants, fences, and 897 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 29 of 30 pesticides are needed; (2) how artificial feeding of coyotes could adversely affect bighorn sheep; and (3) how recreational activities may affect sheep. The use of interpretive signs is encouraged. 118. The contractor shall provide the City with cultural sensitivity training attendance sign-up sheets for all construction workers involved in the project, including custom homes. The requirement for cultural sensitivity training shall be included on all building plans. 119. All earth -moving operations reaching beyond the depth of two feet (2') shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor, and continuous monitoring will become necessary if undisturbed, potentially fossiliferous lakebed sediments are encountered. The monitor shall be empowered to stop earth -moving activities if fossils are identified. The monitor shall be prepared to quickly salvage fossils but must have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction equipment to allow for the removal of abundant or large specimens. A monitoring plan shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any earth - moving permit or the disturbance of any soils on the site, which will include: • Samples of sediments shall be collected and processed to recover small fossil remains. • Recovered specimens shall be identified and curated at a repository with permanent retrievable storage that would allow for further research in the future. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered specimens and a discussion of their significance when appropriate, shall be prepared upon completion of the research procedures outlined above. The report shall be provided to the City within 30 days of the conclusion of monitoring activities. 120. Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit for a residential structure on the site, the project applicant shall purchase a minimum of 72,000 MTCO2e credits (2,400 MTCO2e per year for 30 years). The purchase of carbon credits must be made from a CARB-approved carbon registry with independent third -party verification. Alternatively, the project applicant may submit a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction plan to the City for approval that achieves an equal level of GHG reduction. The GHG plan must include enforceable actions that reduce GHG emissions to at or below the total mitigated values. 121. During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor :•: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 30 of 30 shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 122. The perimeter wall and Peninsular Bighorn Sheep fencing shall be complete prior to the initiation of precise grading on any portion of the property. e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 1 of 27 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Site Development Permit shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: TTM2025-0001 SDP2025-0002 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. The Site Development Permit shall expire twenty-four (24) months after approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) Section 9.200.080 unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design & Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 2 of 27 The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above -listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times, through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. 901 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 3 of 27 D. All erosion and sediment control approved by the City Engineer pursuant to this project. BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be prior to any onsite or offsite grading, E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The inclusion in the Master Homeowners' Association (HOA) Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required. 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate, and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if the Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 9. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street rights -of - way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 11. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: •1. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 4 of 27 A. PUBLIC STREETS Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial) — No additional right-of- way dedication is required. 55 feet from the centerline of Madison Street for a total 110-foot ultimate developed right-of-way 2. Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial) — 55 feet from the centerline of Avenue 58 along the project boundary 3. Avenue 60 (Collector) — 40 feet from the centerline of Avenue 60 for a total 80-foot ultimate developed right-of-way. 4. No additional right-of-way dedication is required. 30 feet from the centerline of Calle Conchita for a total 60-foot ultimate developed right- of-way except for the 80-foot right-of-way portion connecting to Madison Street granted in a Grant of Easement and Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 2013-0360337, of Official Records dated July 26, 2013. 12. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street rights - of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 13. The private street rights -of -way to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS Property line shall be placed at the back of curb, similar to the layout shown on the tentative map and the typical street section shown on the tentative map. Use of smooth curves instead of angular lines at property lines is recommended. Streets "A" through "I" - Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one (1) side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 14. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 903 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 5 of 27 15. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 16. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights -of -way shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights -of -way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 17. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot -wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet (5') in width with the express written approval of IID. 18. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights - of -way as follows: A. Madison Street (Secondary Arterial) — 10 feet from the RAN-P/L. B. Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) — 10 feet from the R/W-P/L. C. Avenue 60 (Collector) — 10 feet from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth for a meandering wall design as approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages, including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 19. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 20. Direct vehicular access to Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita from lots with frontage along Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Tentative Tract Map, or as otherwise conditioned in these Conditions of Approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. 904 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 6 of 27 21. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 22. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted or recorded over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 23. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties And Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 24. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Where a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, it shall be installed in accordance with City standards. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 25. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses). A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Construct Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Madison Street frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 905 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 7 of 27 b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide for full access movements at the primary entry and restore the median landscaping. A left turn deceleration lane for the northbound traffic serving the main project entry shall provide a minimum of 150 feet of vehicle queuing as determined by the traffic study. c. Restripe southbound lanes to an 8-foot bike/cart lane, 4-foot buffer lane, and two (2) 11-foot thru lanes or as approved by the City Engineer. 2) Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Widen the south side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the south side as specified in the General Plan to accommodate an 11-foot travel lane and an 8-foot shoulder, and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Avenue 58 frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 3) Avenue 60 (Collector): a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary plus a distance of 100± feet past the CVWD well site to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions and extend improvements to connect to the existing easterly paved street segment. The north curb face shall be located 25 feet north of the centerline. Street KITS, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 8 of 27 widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. A hammerhead or similar design shall be provided at the western terminus, per Fire Department approval. b. Construct a 6-foot-wide sidewalk 4) Calle Conchita a. Improve street within project boundary with paving and all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation, or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 5) The applicant shall install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and the project's main access prior to issuance of the 2O4tn building permit for a dwelling unit within the development per the traffic study or when warrants are met, whichever comes first. Applicant is responsible for 100% of the cost of designing and installing the traffic signal. The security bond shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant. 6) The applicant is responsible for 25% of the cost to design and install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 58. Applicant shall bond for 25% of the traffic signal. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Streets "A" through "I" — Construct internal streets per the approved layout shown on the tentative map and/or as approved by the City Engineer. Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one (1) side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 907 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 9 of 27 2) The location of driveways of corner lots shall not be located within the curb return and away from the intersection when possible. 26. The main gated entry on Madison Street shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length of 62 feet from the call box to the street; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -accepted vehicles. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1" = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turnaround out onto the main street from the gated entry. Pursuant to said condition, there shall be a minimum of 25 feet of width provided at the turnaround opening. Two (2) lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry: one (1) lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one (1) lane for visitors. The two (2) travel lanes shall be a minimum of 20 feet of total paved roadway surface or as approved by the Fire Department. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 27. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Collector 4.0" a.c /5.0" c.a.b. Secondary Arterial 4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 28. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two (2) years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six (6) months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six (6) months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 10 of 27 production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. 29. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Madison Street (Primary Entry): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. B. Madison Street (Golf Course Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. C. Madison Street (Emergency Access): Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. D. Madison Street (just south of Avenue 58): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. E. Avenue 60 (South Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. F. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Westerly Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. G. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Easterly Access): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. 30. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 31. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 32. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 33. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and, in particular, the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. e PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 11 of 27 B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required, including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans so that ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for accessible parking spaces or as approved by the City Engineer. One (1) van -accessible handicapped parking stall is required per eight (8) handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking spaces shall be a minimum of 26 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 34. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 35. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two (2) years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six (6) months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. 910 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 12 of 27 36. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. 37. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 38. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 39. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Engineer. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Mass Grading Plan 1" = 100' Horizontal B. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. PM 10 Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal D. Erosion Control Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal E. Hydrology Report (Plan submitted in Report Form) F. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through F to be submitted concurrently. G. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical 911 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 13 of 27 H. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 "= 4' Vertical J. Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal NOTE: G through H to be submitted concurrently. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the Public Works Director. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. K. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200 feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants), and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1 foot (1') of cover or as established in the structural calculations and details, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements, including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements, and accessibility requirements. 912 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 14 of 27 40. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets, and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.lag uintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 41. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved plans previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record (EOR) during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the FOR may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of Record Drawing submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 42. Prior to constructing any off -site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bond, each valued at 100% of the cost of the off -site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 43. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 44. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping, and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed or secured prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 913 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 15 of 27 In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 45. Depending on the timing of the development of the Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of the Tentative Tract Map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first -priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 40th Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit(s) related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 46. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off - site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable TV improvements. 47. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, 914 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 16 of 27 withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. f.RAnINf; 48. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 49. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 50. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a professional registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. An Erosion Control Plan showing Best Management Practices prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A Final WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California. F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report and shall be certified as being adequate by a Soils Engineer, or Engineering Geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish the security if it is expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 915 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 17 of 27 51. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping or stabilized with such other erosion control measures as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 52. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e., the slope at the back of the landscape lot), which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six feet (6') adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right-of-way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first 18 inches behind the curb. 53. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 54. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot (1') higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. Where compliance within the above -stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties, and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 55. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5') from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 56. Prior to the issuance of a building permit(s) for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. 916 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 18 of 27 DRAINAGE 57. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for Tract Map No. 39058, Coral Mountain Project (TTM2025-0001), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 58. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on -site during the 100- year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1-hour, 3-hour, 6-hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total runoff. 59. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 60. In the design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches (2") per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero (0) unless the applicant provides site -specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 61. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 62. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 63. For on -site above -ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3.1 and shall be planted with maintenance -free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 64. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation that directly falls onto the setback) 917 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 19 of 27 will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 65. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 66. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 67. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 68. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ.. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopment Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction, and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. 2. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project -specific WQMP shall be provided, which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. 3. The developer/owner shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. .; PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 20 of 27 UTILITIES 69. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 70. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures, including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 71. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to, the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 72. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located so as not to conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 73. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings, and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 74. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 75. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots. 919 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 21 of 27 76. All new landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 77. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing, and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to the completion of precise grading. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until they have been signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 78. The applicant or their agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 79. Prior to final approval of the installation of landscaping, the Landscape Architect of record shall provide the Design and Development Department a letter stating they have personally inspected the installation and that it conforms with the Final Landscaping Plans as approved by the City. 80. If staff determines during final landscaping inspection that adjustments are required in order to meet the intent of the Planning Commission's approval, the Planning Manager shall review and approve any such revisions to the landscape plan. 81. All trees shall be a minimum of 36-inch box. 82. After the installation of landscaping and prior to completion of the golf course, all areas covered by "Native Coarse Sand Material" or "Tan Decomposed Granite," as defined in the SDP plan set, shall be sprayed with a clear polymer soil stabilizing solution, such as guar gum, xanthan gum, or synthetic polymers in order to prevent wind blown sand. 83. Final landscape plans within the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep buffer zones shall comply with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Prohibited Plant List and Land Use Adjacency Guidelines. MAINTENANCE 84. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 920 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 22 of 27 85. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, multi -use trail, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 86. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 87. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect at the time the applicant submits an application for plan check and permits. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 88. The trail located on the western boundary of the project shall be installed and completed, including fencing/walls and access point markers, 60 days following the completion of grading for the golf course. The Final Landscape Plan shall include details for the trail surface and walls. 89. The Final Landscaping Plan is to include: a. Demonstration of an average 30-foot setback from right-of-way to home structure on Madison Street and Avenue 58. b. Specific measurements for plain and accent finish wall distances. c. The wall on Avenue 58 and Madison Street shall provide a weight of at least four (4) pounds per square foot of face area with no decorative cutouts or line - of -sight openings between shielded areas and the roadways. The barrier must present a solid face from top to bottom. Unnecessary openings or decorative cutouts shall not be made. All gaps (except for weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking. 90. The perimeter wall, Peninsular Bighorn Sheep fencing, 10-foot trail, and parkway landscaping shall be completed prior to the initiation of precise grading on any portion of the property. Priority shall be given to the southeast corner of the property, in the area of Calle Conchita and Avenue 60, to provide a barrier between existing homes and the project's construction activities. 921 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 23 of 27 91. The three (3) Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) located on the west boundary of the project site and the adobe site shall be fully protected and fenced, and a letter from the ACBCI approving the protection and fencing shall be provided to the City prior to any ground disturbance, including grubbing or vegetation removal. 92. Prior to any ground disturbance on any portion of the site, the developer shall provide the City with: a. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating compliance with burrowing owl and nesting bird requirements. b. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating completion of 2025 bat surveys, and results (presence or absence) of same. c. Letter from a qualified historian demonstrating the correct installation of fencing surrounding the adobe. d. Letters from a qualified archaeologist and Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Tribal Historic Preservation Officer confirming that all remediation, data recovery, and mitigation of identified sites and resources have been completed to their satisfaction. e. Letter(s) from ACBCI approving the Archaeological Treatment, Disposition and Monitoring Plan and the Rock Art Management Plan, with a copy of the approved plan attached. f. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified archaeologist and ACBCI for all ground disturbing activities. g. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified biologist and noise engineer. 93. The Final Landscaping Plan is to include: a. Demonstration of an average 30-foot setback from right-of-way on Madison Street and Avenue 58. b. The wall on Avenue 58 and Madison Street shall provide a weight of at least four (4) pounds per square foot of face area with no decorative cutouts or line - of -sight openings between shielded areas and the roadways. The barrier must present a solid face from top to bottom. Unnecessary openings or decorative cutouts shall not be made. All gaps (except for weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking. 922 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 24 of 27 94. All construction plans are to include in their notes: a. Paving installation activity shall not overlap with the architectural coating (building painting) activity. b. The contractor shall adhere to applicable measures contained in Table 1 of Rule 403, including, but not limited to: • All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. • The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three (3) times a day, preferably in the mid -morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are limited to 15 miles per hour or less. c. The following measures shall be incorporated into project plans and specifications as implementation of SCAQMD Rule 1113 (3): • Only "Low -Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)" paints (no more than 50 grams/liter (g/L) of VOC) consistent with SCAQMD Rule 1113 shall be used. BACM AQ-3: The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood -burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. 95. Burrowing owl surveys shall be performed by a qualified biologist, approved by the City, prior to any site disturbance activities. A minimum of two (2) surveys, occurring at least three (3) weeks apart, shall be completed in advance of any site disturbance activities. If disturbance activities are expected to start during the burrowing owl breeding season, three (3) surveys shall be completed. The final burrowing owl survey shall be completed within three (3) days prior to initiation of any site disturbance activities. The pre -construction survey shall be conducted in accordance with accepted protocol and the requirements specified in the CVMSHCP. Prior to construction, a qualified biologist will survey the construction area and an area up to 500 feet outside the project limits for burrows that could be used by burrowing owls. If the burrow is determined to be occupied, the burrow will be flagged, and a 160-foot diameter buffer will be established during the non - breeding season or a 250-foot diameter buffer during the breeding season. The buffer area will be staked and marked with flags. No development activities will be 923 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 25 of 27 permitted within the buffer zone until the young are no longer dependent on the burrow and have left the burrow. If the burrow is found to be unoccupied, the burrow will be made inaccessible to owls, and construction may proceed. If either a nesting or escape burrow is occupied, owls shall be relocated pursuant to accepted Wildlife Agency protocols. Determination of the appropriate method of relocation, such as eviction/passive relocation or active relocation, shall be based on the specific site conditions (e.g., distance to nearest suitable habitat and presence of burrows within that habitat) in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. If burrowing owls are observed within the Project site during construction activities, CDFW shall be notified immediately and provided with proposed avoidance and minimization measures, consistent with the requirements of the CVMSHCP. 96. Removal of trees (including palm trees) shall occur outside the bat maternity season (March 15—August 31 in the Coachella Valley), which coincides with the bird nesting season, to avoid the potential for "take" of flightless young. Trees and snags that have been identified as confirmed or potential roost sites require a two- step removal process and the involvement of a bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. Consistent with CDFW protocols this two-step removal shall occur over two (2) consecutive days as follows: on Day 1, branches and limbs not containing cavities, as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a bat biologist. The disturbance caused by limb removal, followed by an interval of one (1) evening, will allow bats to safely abandon the roost. 97. To avoid impacts to roosting bats from the installation of new light fixtures associated with the proposed development, all lighting fixtures shall have light shields or similar devices (i.e., dark sky compliant lighting) installed to ensure that there is no light trespass onto Coral Mountain and the surrounding open space. A supplemental light study will be performed to collect nighttime lighting measurements and confirm that no light trespass onto Coral Mountain is occurring prior to occupancy of the first housing unit adjacent to Coral Mountain. 98. A qualified bat biologist shall confirm the absence of roosting bats prior to any restoration work or other disturbance of the adobe site. If bats are found or if the absence of bats cannot be confirmed, the bat biologist will install or directly supervise the installation of humane eviction devices and exclusionary material to prevent bats from roosting in the building. Implementation of the humane eviction/exclusions is typically performed in the Fall (September or October) preceding construction activity at each structure to avoid impacts to hibernating bats during the winter months or during the maternity season (March 15—August 924 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 26 of 27 31 in the Coachella Valley), when nonvolant (flightless) young are present. Any humane eviction/exclusion devices must be installed at least 10 days prior to the demolition of a structure housing bats to allow sufficient time for the bats to vacate the roost(s). 99. To ensure compliance with the California Fish and Game Code and the MBTA and to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds, vegetation removal and ground - disturbing activities shall be conducted outside the general bird nesting season. Any vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and/or construction activities that occur during the nesting season will require that all suitable habitats be surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist who is pre -approved by the CDFW. Prior to commencement of clearing, a qualified biologist shall conduct preconstruction surveys within 14 days and repeated three (3) days prior to ground -disturbing activities. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) around the nest adjacent to construction will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. During construction activities, the qualified biologist shall continue biological monitoring activities at a frequency recommended by the qualified biologist using their best professional judgment, or as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies. If nesting birds are detected, avoidance and minimization measures may be adjusted and construction activities stopped or redirected by the qualified biologist using their best professional judgment as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies to avoid the "take" of nesting birds. 100. To ensure the project will avoid any significant construction noise impacts on wildlife using Coral Mountain, noise monitoring will be conducted for all construction activities using heavy equipment within 150 feet of the base of Coral Mountain. If noise levels exceed 75 dBA, construction operational changes or other project modifications shall be made, as directed by the project biologist, to reduce the noise levels at Coral Mountain to below 75 dBA. 101. A written plan for an educational program about the Peninsular bighorn sheep and their associated habitat shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of the first building permit for residential units on the property. The plan shall demonstrate how educational programs will be implemented and maintained throughout the resort, open space, and low -density community programs through the use of signage, pamphlets, and staff education. The Education Program should inform the reason why specific measures are being taken to support the recovery of Peninsular bighorn sheep. The Education Program should include the ecology of Peninsular bighorn sheep, threats this species currently faces, and how recovery actions will reduce these threats. This includes information that explains: (1) why restrictions on toxic plants, fences, and pesticides are needed; (2) how artificial feeding of coyotes could adversely affect 925 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 27 of 27 bighorn sheep; and (3) how recreational activities may affect sheep. The use of interpretive signs is encouraged. 102. The contractor shall provide the City with cultural sensitivity training attendance sign up sheets for all construction workers involved in the project, including custom homes. The requirement for cultural sensitivity training shall be included on all building plans. 103. All earth -moving operations reaching beyond the depth of two feet (2') shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor, and continuous monitoring will become necessary if undisturbed, potentially fossiliferous lakebed sediments are encountered. The monitor shall be empowered to stop earth -moving activities if fossils are identified. The monitor shall be prepared to quickly salvage fossils, but must have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction equipment to allow for the removal of abundant or large specimens. A monitoring plan shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any earth - moving permit or the disturbance of any soils on the site, which will include: • Samples of sediments shall be collected and processed to recover small fossil remains. • Recovered specimens shall be identified and curated at a repository with permanent retrievable storage that would allow for further research in the future. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered specimens and a discussion of their significance when appropriate, shall be prepared upon completion of the research procedures outlined above. The report shall be provided to the City within 30 days of the conclusion of monitoring activities. 104. During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 926 EXHIBIT C PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 1 of 26 C,FNFRAI 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Site Development Permit shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: TTM2025-0001 SDP2025-0001 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. The Site Development Permit shall expire twenty-four (24) months after approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) Section 9.200.080 unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design & Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) 927 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 2 of 26 • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above -listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times, through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 3 of 26 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The inclusion in the Master Homeowners' Association (HOA) Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required. 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if the Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 9. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street rights -of - way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 929 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 4 of 26 11. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial) — No additional right-of- way dedication is required. 55 feet from the centerline of Madison Street for a total 110-foot ultimate developed right-of-way 2. Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial) — 55 feet from the centerline of Avenue 58 along the project boundary 3. Avenue 60 (Collector) — 40 feet from the centerline of Avenue 60 for a total 80-foot ultimate developed right-of-way 4. Calle Conchita (Local Street) - No additional right-of-way dedication is required. 30 feet from the centerline of Calle Conchita for a total 60-foot ultimate developed right-of-way except for the 80-foot right-of-way portion connecting to Madison Street granted in a Grant of Easement and Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 2013-0360337, of Official Records dated July 26, 2013. 12. The private street rights -of -way to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS Property line shall be placed at the back of curb ,similar to the layout shown on the tentative map and the typical street section shown in the tentative map. Use of smooth curves instead of angular lines at property lines is recommended. Streets "A" through "I" - Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 13. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 930 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 5 of 26 14. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 15. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights -of -way shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights -of -way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot -wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of, all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet (5) in width with the express written approval of IID. 17. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights - of -way as follows: A. Madison Street (Secondary Arterial) - 10 feet from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) - 10 feet from the R/W-P/L. C. Avenue 60 (Collector) - 10 feet from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth for a meandering wall design as approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages, including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 18. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 19. Direct vehicular access to Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita from lots with frontage along Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Tentative Tract Map, or as otherwise conditioned in these Conditions of Approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. 931 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 6 of 26 20. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 21. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted or recorded over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties And Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 23. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Where a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, it shall be installed in accordance with City standards. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 24. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses). A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Construct Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Madison Street frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 932 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 7 of 26 b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide for full access movements at the primary entry and restore the median landscaping. A left turn deceleration lane for the northbound traffic serving the main project entry shall provide a minimum of 150 feet of vehicle queuing as determined by the traffic study. c. Restripe southbound lanes to eight foot (8') bike/cart lane, four foot (4') buffer lane, and two (2) 11 foot thru lanes or as approved by the City Engineer. 2) Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Widen the south side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the south side as specified in the General Plan to accommodate an 11-foot travel lane and an 8-foot shoulder, and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Avenue 58 frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 3) Avenue 60 (Collector): a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary plus a distance of 100± feet past the CVWD well site to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions and extend improvements to connect to the existing easterly paved street segment. The north curb face shall be located 25 feet north of the centerline. Street 933 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 8 of 26 widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. A hammerhead or similar design shall be provided at the western terminus, per Fire Department approval. b. Construct a 6-foot-wide sidewalk 4) Calle Conchita a. Improve street within project boundary with paving and all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation, or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 5) The applicant shall install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and the project's main access prior to issuance of the 204tn building permit for a dwelling unit within the development per the traffic study or when warrants are met, whichever comes first. Applicant is responsible for 100% of the cost of designing and installing the traffic signal. The security bond shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant. 6) The applicant is responsible for 25% of the cost to design and install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 58. Applicant shall bond for 25% of the traffic signal. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Streets "A" through "I" — Construct internal streets per the approved layout shown on the tentative map and/or as approved by the City Engineer. Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side, and 24 feet (24')if on -street parking is prohibited and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 934 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 9 of 26 2) The location of driveways of corner lots shall not be located within the curb return and away from the intersection when possible. 25. The main gated entry on Madison Street shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length of 62 feet from call box to the street; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -accepted vehicles. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1" = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turnaround out onto the main street from the gated entry. Pursuant to said condition, there shall be a minimum of 25 feet of width provided at the turnaround opening. Two (2) lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry; one (1) lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one (1) lane for visitors. The two (2) travel lanes shall be a minimum of 20 feet of total paved roadway surface or as approved by the Fire Department. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 26. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Collector 4.0" a.c /5.0" c.a.b. Secondary Arterial 4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 27. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six (6) months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six (6) months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current 935 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 10 of 26 production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. 28. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Madison Street (Primary Entry): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. B. Madison Street (Golf Course Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. C. Madison Street (Emergency Access): Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. D. Madison Street (just south of Avenue 58): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. E. Avenue 60 (South Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. F. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Westerly Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. G. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Easterly Access): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. 29. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 30. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 31. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 32. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and, in particular, the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. 936 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 11 of 26 B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required, including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans so that ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for accessible parking spaces or as approved by the City Engineer. One (1) van -accessible handicapped parking stall is required per eight (8) handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking spaces shall be a minimum of 26 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 33. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 34. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. 937 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 12 of 26 35. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. 36. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 37. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 38. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Engineer. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Mass Grading Plan 1" = 100' Horizontal B. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal D. Erosion Control Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal E. Hydrology Report (Plan submitted in Report Form) F. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through F to be submitted concurrently. G. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 13 of 26 H. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal I. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 "= 4' Vertical J. Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal NOTE: G through H to be submitted concurrently The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the Public Works Director. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. K. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200 feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants), and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot (1') of cover or as established in the structural calculations and details, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements, including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements, and accessibility requirements. 939 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 14 of 26 39. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets, and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.lag uintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 40. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved plans previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record (EOR) during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the FOR may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of Record Drawing submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 41. Prior to constructing any off -site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bond each valued at 100% of the cost of the off -site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 42. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 43. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed or secured prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 940 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 15 of 26 In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 44. Depending on the timing of the development of the Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of the Tentative Tract Map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first -priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 40th Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit(s) related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 45. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off - site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable TV improvements. 46. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, 941 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 16 of 26 withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. r,RAnINr, 47. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 48. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 49. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a professional registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. An Erosion Control Plan showing Best Management Practices prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A Final WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California. F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a Soils Engineer, or Engineering Geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish the security if it is expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 942 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 17 of 26 50. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping or stabilized with such other erosion control measures as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 51. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e., the slope at the back of the landscape lot), which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six feet (6') adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right-of-way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first 18 inches behind the curb. 52. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 53. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot (1') higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. Where compliance within the above -stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties, and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 54. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (05) from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 55. Prior to the issuance of a building permit(s) for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. 943 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 18 of 26 nRAINAC;F 56. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for Tract Map No. 39058, Coral Mountain Project (TTM2025-0001), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 57. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on -site during the 100- year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1-hour, 3-hour, 6-hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total runoff. 58. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 59. In the design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches (2") per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero (0) unless the applicant provides site -specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 60. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 61. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 62. For on -site above -ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance -free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 63. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation that directly falls onto the setback) 944 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 19 of 26 will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 64. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 65. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 66. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 67. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ.. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopment Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction, and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. 2. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project -specific WQMP shall be provided, which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. 3. The developer/owner shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. 945 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 20 of 26 I ITII ITIF.0, 68. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 69. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures, including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 70. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to, the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 71. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located so as not to conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 72. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings, and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 73. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 74. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots. 946 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 21 of 26 75. All new landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 76. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing, and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Manager determines extenuating circumstances exist that justify an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until they have been signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 77. The applicant or their agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 78. Prior to final approval of the installation of landscaping, the Landscape Architect of record shall provide the Design and Development Department a letter stating they have personally inspected the installation and that it conforms with the Final Landscaping Plans as approved by the City. 79. If staff determines during final landscaping inspection that adjustments are required in order to meet the intent of the Planning Commission's approval, the Planning Manager shall review and approve any such revisions to the landscape plan. MAINTENANCE 80. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 81. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, multi -use trail, and stormwater BMPs. 947 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 22 of 26 FEES AND DEPOSITS 82. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 83. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect at the time the applicant submits an application for plan check and permits. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 84. The access driveway onto Madison Street shall be permanently closed, paving removed, and landscaping installed within 60 days of the completion of the main project entry. 85. The improvements on the site will be removed within 60 days of the sale of the last lot within the project. Prior to removal, the developer shall provide the City with a site restoration plan (if being returned to native condition) or a Site Development Permit (if proposed for alternative use) for review and approval. 86. Prior to any ground disturbance on any portion of the site, the developer shall provide the City with: a. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating compliance with burrowing owl and nesting bird requirements. b. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating completion of 2025 bat surveys, and results (presence or absence) of same. c. Letter from a qualified historian demonstrating the correct installation of fencing surrounding the adobe. d. Letters from a qualified archaeologist and Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Tribal Historic Preservation Officer confirming that all remediation, data recovery, and mitigation of identified sites and resources have been completed to their satisfaction. e. Letter(s) from ACBCI approving the Archaeological Treatment, Disposition and Monitoring Plan and the Rock Art Management Plan, with a copy of the approved plan attached. M: PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 23 of 26 f. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified archaeologist and ACBCI for all ground disturbing activities. g. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified biologist and noise engineer. 87. All construction plans to include in their notes: a. Paving installation activity shall not overlap with the architectural coating (building painting) activity. b. The contractor shall adhere to applicable measures contained in Table 1 of Rule 403, including, but not limited to: • All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. • The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three (3) times a day, preferably in the mid -morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are limited to 15 miles per hour or less. c. The following measures shall be incorporated into project plans and specifications as implementation of SCAQMD Rule 1113 (3): • Only "Low -Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)" paints (no more than 50 grams/liter (g/L) of VOC) consistent with SCAQMD Rule 1113 shall be used. BACM AQ-3: The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood -burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. 88. Burrowing owl surveys shall be performed by a qualified biologist, approved by the City, prior to any site disturbance activities. A minimum of two surveys, occurring at least three (3) weeks apart, shall be completed in advance of any site disturbance activities. If disturbance activities are expected to start during the burrowing owl breeding season, three (3) surveys shall be completed. The final burrowing owl survey shall be completed within three (3) days prior to initiation of any site disturbance activities. The pre -construction survey shall be conducted in accordance with accepted protocol and the requirements specified in the CVMSHCP. Prior to construction, a qualified biologist will survey the construction area and an area up to 500 feet outside the project limits for burrows that could be 949 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 24 of 26 used by burrowing owls. If the burrow is determined to be occupied, the burrow will be flagged, and a 160-foot diameter buffer will be established during the non - breeding season or a 250-foot diameter buffer during the breeding season. The buffer zone area will be staked and marked with flags. No development activities will be permitted within the buffer until the young are no longer dependent on the burrow and have left the burrow. If the burrow is found to be unoccupied, the burrow will be made inaccessible to owls, and construction may proceed. If either a nesting or escape burrow is occupied, owls shall be relocated pursuant to accepted Wildlife Agency protocols. Determination of the appropriate method of relocation, such as eviction/passive relocation or active relocation, shall be based on the specific site conditions (e.g., distance to nearest suitable habitat and presence of burrows within that habitat) in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. If burrowing owls are observed within the Project site during construction activities, CDFW shall be notified immediately and provided with proposed avoidance and minimization measures, consistent with the requirements of the CVMSHCP. 89. Removal of trees (including palm trees) shall occur outside the bat maternity season (March 15—August 31 in the Coachella Valley), which coincides with the bird nesting season, to avoid the potential for "take" of flightless young. Trees and snags that have been identified as confirmed or potential roost sites require a two- step removal process and the involvement of a bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. Consistent with CDFW protocols this two-step removal shall occur over two (2) consecutive days as follows: on Day 1, branches and limbs not containing cavities, as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a bat biologist. The disturbance caused by limb removal, followed by an interval of one (1) evening, will allow bats to safely abandon the roost. 90. To avoid impacts to roosting bats from the installation of new light fixtures associated with the proposed development, all lighting fixtures shall have light shields or similar devices (i.e., dark sky compliant lighting) installed to ensure that there is no light trespass onto Coral Mountain and the surrounding open space. A supplemental light study will be performed to collect nighttime lighting measurements and confirm that no light trespass onto Coral Mountain is occurring prior to occupancy of the first housing unit adjacent to Coral Mountain. 91. A qualified bat biologist shall confirm the absence of roosting bats prior to any restoration work or other disturbance of the adobe site. If bats are found or if the absence of bats cannot be confirmed, the bat biologist will install or directly 950 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 25 of 26 supervise the installation of humane eviction devices and exclusionary material to prevent bats from roosting in the building. Implementation of the humane eviction/exclusions is typically performed in the fall (September or October) preceding construction activity at each structure to avoid impacts to hibernating bats during the winter months or during the maternity season (March 15—August 31 in the Coachella Valley), when nonvolant (flightless) young are present. Any humane eviction/exclusion devices must be installed at least 10 days prior to the demolition of a structure housing bats to allow sufficient time for the bats to vacate the roost(s). 92. To ensure compliance with California Fish and Game Code and the MBTA and to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds, vegetation removal and ground -disturbing activities shall be conducted outside the general bird nesting season. Any vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and/or construction activities that occur during the nesting season will require that all suitable habitats be surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist who is pre -approved by the CDFW. Prior to commencement of clearing, a qualified biologist shall conduct preconstruction surveys within 14 days and repeated three (3) days prior to ground -disturbing activities. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) around the nest adjacent to construction will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. During construction activities, the qualified biologist shall continue biological monitoring activities at a frequency recommended by the qualified biologist using their best professional judgment, or as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies. If nesting birds are detected, avoidance and minimization measures may be adjusted and construction activities stopped or redirected by the qualified biologist using their best professional judgment, as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies to avoid "take" of nesting birds. 93. The contractor shall provide the City with cultural sensitivity training attendance sign-up sheets for all construction workers involved in the project, including custom homes. The requirement for cultural sensitivity training shall be included on all building plans. 94. All earth -moving operations reaching beyond the depth of two feet shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor, and continuous monitoring will become necessary if undisturbed, potentially fossiliferous lakebed sediments are encountered. The monitor shall be empowered to stop earth -moving activities if fossils are identified. The monitor shall be prepared to quickly salvage fossils, but must have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction equipment to allow for the removal of abundant or large specimens. 951 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-XXX CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — RECOMMENDED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: PAGE 26 of 26 A monitoring plan shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any earth - moving permit or the disturbance of any soils on the site, which will include: • Samples of sediments shall be collected and processed to recover small fossil remains. • Recovered specimens shall be identified and curated at a repository with permanent retrievable storage that would allow for further research in the future. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered specimens and a discussion of their significance when appropriate, shall be prepared upon completion of the research procedures outlined above. The report shall be provided to the City within 30 days of the conclusion of monitoring activities. 95. During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 952 ATTACHMENT 1 Vicinity Map 52ND AVENUE � W I LAJ G � z W N. LL I W 54TH AVENUE i t ~ w �I Ln Ln CITY OF 0 ' O( z LA QUINTA Z RIVERSIDE 000UNTY O V Ln G z0 AIRPORT BLVD. 0 Q VICINITY MAP N.T.S. 58TH AVENUE SITE I E ,x=� N 60TH AVENUE M 953 ATTACHMENT 2 PROJECT INFORMATION CASE NUMBER: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 REQUEST: CONSIDER A RESOLUTION APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP TO ALLOW SUBDIVISION OF THE SITE INTO 204 RESIDENTIAL LOTS, GOLF COURSE, STREETS, AND ANCILLARY FACILITIES; A SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF THE GOLF COURSE AND PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AND WALL; AND A SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT TO ALLOW A SALES CENTER ON MADISON STREET LOCATION: APN: 764-840-021, 766-070-003, 766-070-006, 766-070-012, 766- 070-014, 766-080-001, 766-080-002, 66-080-004, 766-080-005, 764- 210-007, 764-210-028 & 764-210-029 CEQA: THE LA QUINTA DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS DETERMINED THAT THIS PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT EIR EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310), AND THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED, AS ALLOWED IN CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 GENERALPLAN DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, OPEN SPACE RECREATION ZONING DESIGNATION: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, OPEN SPACE - RECREATION SURROUNDING ZONING/ LAND USES: NORTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES SOUTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/VACANT, SINGLE- FAMILY HOMES EAST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL/ANDALUSIA WEST: OPEN SPACE/ VACANT LAND, CORAL MOUNTAIN 954 ATTACHMENT 3 FINDINGS Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) 1. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan and Specific Plan 03-067, as amended, and implements the residential, golf course, and commercial uses allowed in those documents. 2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, with the implementation of recommended Conditions of Approval. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The mitigation measures included in the Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310) will reduce impacts to less than significant levels, and the reduction in residential lots proposed in the Tract Map will further reduce impacts associated with the project. 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as the map will be required to comply with all laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality, and other public health issues both in this Map and in subsequent site development permits and other approvals necessary for development of the land. 5. The site of the proposed subdivision is suitable for the density and type of development proposed. The reduction of units from the maximum allowed in the Specific Plan is suitable for the subject property. 6. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 13 of the City's Subdivision Regulations Code, minimum lot area requirements, and other applicable provisions of Title 9 of the City's Municipal Code, Subdivision Map Act and Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment No. 5. 7. The design and improvements required for the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All roadway improvements, easements, if any, and surrounding improvements will be completed to City and Specific Plan standards. Site Development Permit 2025-0001 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan 03-067, as amended, and furthers the goals of the Specific Plan to create a self- 955 contained high -quality community with golf amenities and services. The proposed golf course design reduces the golf course water consumption by creating desert - friendly buffer areas that will enhance the visual character of the site. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City's Zoning Code in terms of site plan and landscaping. The Site Development Permit is compliant with the Specific Plan and Zoning Code's development standards, including standards for setbacks and landscaping requirements. 3. The La Quinta Design and Development Department has determined that this project is consistent with the certified Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310), insofar as the Environmental Impact Report analyzed up to 750 residential units, a golf course, and a commercial corner. In this case, the project consists of a golf course on 182 of the 384 acres, consistent with what was previously analyzed. The project, as proposed, will reduce the effects and impacts analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report. 4. The layout of the golf course is compatible and complementary to surrounding development, which includes golf courses to the north, east, and south. 5. The site design of the project is compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The proposed golf course will be of high quality and will incorporate a desert -friendly plant palette which is sensitive to biological resources. 6. The proposed project implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Zoning Code. The landscape palette is consistent with the Specific Plan's and the City's drought -tolerant landscaping requirements. Site Development Permit 2025-0002 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan 03-067, as amended, and furthers the goals of the Specific Plan to create a self- contained high -quality community with golf amenities and services. The proposed sales center will provide a highly landscaped, low-lying location offering future residential land sales surrounded by perimeter landscaping and project walls. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City's Zoning Code in terms of site plan and landscaping. The Site Development Permit is compliant with the Specific Plan and Zoning Code's development standards, including standards for setbacks, building height, and landscaping requirements. 956 3. The La Quinta Design and Development Department has determined that this project is consistent with the certified Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report for the project (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310), insofar as the Environmental Impact Report analyzed up to 750 residential units, a golf course, and a commercial corner. In this case, the project consists of a sales center located on land which will be developed for neighborhood commercial use in the future, and the sales center is consistent with an office use permitted in the Specific Plan. The project, as proposed, will reduce the effects and impacts analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report. 4. The sales center is compatible and complementary to surrounding developments, insofar as it provides a garden -like setting, limited construction, and compatible design to the surrounding golf course communities. 5. The site design of the project is compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The proposed sales center provides a highly landscaped, low -impact development that will facilitate the sales of homes within a limited area of the Specific Plan. 6. The proposed project implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Zoning Code. The landscape palette is consistent with the Specific Plan's and City's drought -tolerant landscaping requirements, while the low -profile buildings and central courtyard facilitate low -impact development of the site. 957 ATTACHMENT 4 2.8.4 Coral Mountain Club (West) Plant Material Palette Table 3, Coral Mountain Club Plant Material Palette, provides a list of compatible trees, shrubs, and groundcovers to be incorporated as part of the landscape design. Landscape architecture for the Specific Plan is intended to create a lush desert character of visual variety and textural interest while complying with water conserving techniques based on plant selection and technical irrigation system design. Consistent with this goal, use of drought tolerant plant material is a primary consideration in the development of the plant palette to further aid in the conservation of water while promoting this lush desert theme in the prevailing landscape image. To provide guidance to the builders and designers of future projects within the Project, the plant material palette gives guidance to builders and developers within the Project. Species in addition to those listed are to be considered in order to provide diversity; however, the plant material in the list provided is relatively successful in the unique soil and climactic conditions of Project site. TABLE 3: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB PLANT MATERIAL PALETTE Botanical Name Common Name Trees & Palms Acacia aneura * ** Mul a Acacia berlandieri Berlandier Acacia / Guajillo Acacia Acacia salicina * ** Willow Acacia Acacia sali na * ** Blue Leaf Wattle Acacia smallii * ** Sweet Acacia Acacia stenophylla Shoestring Acacia Acacia willardiana Palo Blanco Albizia 'ulibrissin *** Mimosa Tree Bauhinia purpurea *** Purple Orchid Tree Bauhinia lunarioides White Orchid Tree Brahea armata Mexican Blue Palm Brahea armata 'Clara' Clara Mexican Blue Palm Brahea species Brahea Bismarckia nobilis Bismarck Palm Butia ca itata Pindo Palm Brachychiton populneus Bottle Tree Caesalpinia cacalaco Cascalote Callistemon viminalis *** Bottlebrush Tree Cercidium floridum Blue Palo Verde Cercidium hybrid 'Desert Museum' Desert Museum Cercidium praecox Palo Brea Chamaerops humilus Mediterranean Fan Palm Cercidium microph Ilum Foothill Palo Verde Cercidium 'Sonoran Emerald' Sonoran Emerald Palo Verde Chitalpa tashkentensis Chitalpa Chilo sis linearis Desert Willow 2.73 Specific Plan 03-067 Chorisia s eciosa Silk Floss Tree Citrus species *** Citrus Tree Cordia boissieri Texas Olive Cu ressus sem ervirens Italian Cypress C cas revoluta Sa o Palm Dalber is sissoo Indian Rosewood Eucalyptus cinerea *** Silver Dollar Gum Eucalyptus papuana *** Ghost Gum E senhardtia orthocar a Kidne wood Fortunella margarita *** Kumquat Fraxinus uhdei 'Majestic Beauty' Ever reen Ash Fraxinus velutina Arizona Ash Gei'era parviflora *** Australian Willow Humilus Mediterranean Fan Palm Jacaranda mimosifolia *** Jacaranda Koelreuteria bipinnata *** Chinese Lantern Tree La erstroemia indica Crape Myrtle L siloma micro h lla var. thornberi Fern -of -the -Desert Melaleuca quinguenervia *** Pa er Bark Tree Olea europaea * ** Olive Olneya tesota Ironwood Parkinsonia aculeata * ** Mexican Palo Verde Phoenix dact lifera Date Palm Phoenix roebelenii P m Date Palm Ra his excelsa Broadleaf Lady Palm Pinus canariensis *** Canary Island Pine Pinus elderica *** Af han Pine Pinus halepensis *** Aleppo Pine Pistacia chinensis Chinese Pistache Pithecellobium mexicanum / Havardia mexicana Mexican Ebony Pithecellobium spinosa / Ebenopsis ebony Texas Ebony Prosopsis chinensis Chilean Mesquite Prosopsis glandulosa Texas Honey Mesquite Prosopis glandulosa var torreyana Western Honey Mesquite Prosopis X'Phoenix' Phoenix Thornless Mesquite P rus kawakami Evergreen Pear Quercus agrifolia Coast Live Oak Quercus suber Cork Oak Quercus vir iniana Southern Live Oak Rhus lancea African Sumac Ti uana ti u Ti u Tree Thevetia peruviana Yellow Oleander Ulmus parvifolia "Drake" Drake Elm Vitex a nus-castus Chase Tree Washin Ionia filifera California Fan Palm Washin Ionia robusta * ** Mexican Fan Palm Acacia farnesiana * ** Sweet Acacia Bucida buceras Black Olive Prosopis species Mesquite 2.74 Specific Plan 03-067 959 Shrubs Ambrosia deltoides Triangle Bur Ragweed Fallu is paradoxa Apache Plume Atri lex canescens Fourwing Saltbush Bougainvillea species Bush Bougainvillea Caesel inia pulcherrima Red Bird of Paradise Calliandra californica Fairy Duster Callistemon viminalis 'Little John' Bottlebrush Carissa cultivars Natal Plum Carissa grandiflora 'Green Carpet' Natal Plum Cassia nemo hila Desert Cassia Cassia Senna species Cassia Chrysactinia mexicana Chamisa Chrysothamnus nauseosus Damianita Dais Convolvulus species Morning ory Dalea species Dalea Dianella species *** Flax Lily Dietes ve eta Fortnight Li Dodonaea viscosa Hop Bush Eremophila species Figwort Elaeocar us deci lens Ja anese Blueberry Encelia actoni Acton Brittlebush Encellia farinosa Brittlebush Ericameria laricifolia Tur entine Bush Erio onum fasciculatum var polifolium Flat Top Buckwheat Hemerocallis hybrid Daylil Heteromeles arbutifolia Toyon Hibiscus species *** Hibiscus Hyptis emoryi Desert Lavender Ixora coccinea species *** Jun le Geranium Justicia californica Chuparosa Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush Lavandula species Lavender Leucophyllum species Texas Ranger M rtus communis 'Compacta' Compact Myrtle Nandina domestica *** Heavenly Bamboo Nerium oleander * ** Oleander Nolina parryi Parry's Nolina Olea europaea 'Little 011ie' * ** Little 011ie Dwarf Olive Peritoma arborea Bladderpod Spiderflower Photinia fraseri Fraser's Photinia Pittosporum species ' Pittosporum Poliomintha maderensis Mexican Oregano Prunus caroliniana *** Carolina Laurel Cherry Psilostro he coo eri Cooper's paper dais Punica granatum Pome ranate P racantha species Fire Thorn Rhaphiolepis species Indian Hawthorn Rosa 'Home -Run' *** Rose Rosa 'Iceberg' varieties Rose 2.75 Specific Plan 03-067 m Rosa 'Knock -Out' *** Rose Rosa species *** Rose Rosmarinus officinalis Rosemary Rosmarinus species Rosemary Ruellia brittoniana 'Katie' and varieties Ruellia 'Katie' Ruellia californica Ruellia Ruellia peninsularis Ba'a Ruellia Ruellia species Ruellia Russellia equisetiformis Firecracker Plant Salvia species Sage Simmondsia chinensis Jojoba So hora secundiflora Texas Mountain Laurel S haeralcea ambi ua Desert Globemallow Strelitzia species Bird Of Paradise Ta etes lemmonii Mexican Marigold Tecoma scans Yellow Bells Vau uelinia californica Arizona Rosewood Vi uiera parishii Goldene e Tecomaria ca ensis Cape Honeysuckle Xylosma con estum Shiny X losma Zauschneria californica Hummingbird Flower Groundcovers Abronia species Abronia Acacia redolens 'Desert Carpet' * Limited Use Prostrate Acacia Baccharis x Centennial Centennial Coyote Bush Baccharis X 'Stern' Starn Coyote Bush Bougainvillea species Bou ainvillea Bulbine frutescens Bulbine Carissa species Natal Plum Cobble or Gravel - Convolvulus species Bush Morning Glory Dalea greggii Trailing Indi o Bush Dalea species Dalea Decomposed granite - Evolvulus glomeratus Hawaiian Blue Eyes Festuca ovina 'Glauca' Blue Fescue Gazania ri ens var. leucolaena Trailing Gazania Glandularia gooddingii Mojave Verbena Glandularia species Glandularia Lantana camara 'New Gold' New Gold Lantana Lantana montevidensis Trailing Lantana Melampodium leucanthum Black -Foot Daisy M o orum parvifolium Prostrate M o orum Oenothera caes itosa Tufted Evening Primrose Oenothera species * ** Evening Primrose Pyracantha fortuneana Chinese Firethorn Rosmarinus O.'Irene' Trailing Rosemary Rosmarinus officinalis 'Prostratus' Creeping Rosemary / Prostratus Rosemary 2.76 Specific Plan 03-067 961 Rosmarinus species Rosemary Santolina species Lavender Cotton Spha neticola trilobata / Wedelia trilobata Wedelia Turf/ Grass/SOD Over -Seeded Teucrium chamaedrys Germander Teucrium chamaed s ' rostratum' Creeping Germander Trachelos ermum 'asminoides Star Jasmine Verbena species Verbena Vines/Espaliers Anti onon le to us *** Coral Vine Bougainvillea species Bougainvillea Calliandra haematoce hala Pink Powder Puff Campsis radicans Trumpet Vine Clytostoma calliste ioides Violet Trumpet Vine Duranta species *** Skyflower Ficus purnila Creeping fig Gelsemium sem ervirens Carolina Jasmine Grewia caffra Lavender Star Flower Ipomoea acuminata Blue Dawn Flower Macfadyena un uis-cati Cat's Claw Vine Pyracantha species Fire Thorn P roste is venusta Flame Vine Rosa banksiae Lady Banks Rose Tecoma scans Yellow Bells Tecomaria capensis Cape Honeysuckle Trachelospermum 'asminoides *** Star Jasmine Accents & Grasses Achnatherum h menoides Indian Rice Grass Annuals Annual Color Agave americana Century Plant Agave deserti Desert Agave Agave desmettiana Smooth Agave Agave parryi Parry's A ave Agave victoriae-re inae Queen Victoria Agave Agave species Agave Aloe barbadensis Aloe Vera Aloespecies Aloe Ascle ias subulata Desert Milkweed Cereus hildmannianus Hedge Cactus Cereus peruvianus Peruvian Apple Cactus Cylindropuntia acanthocarpa buckhorn cholla Das lirion wheeleri Desert Spoon Das lirion species Desert Sp on Echinocactus grusonii Golden Barrel Cactus Echinocactus species Cactus Echino sis pachanoi San Pedro Cactus Euphorbia antisyphilitica candelilla Eu horbia species Eu horbia 2.77 Specific Plan 03-067 •.. Equisetum hyemale Horsetail Ferocactus species Barrel Cactus Festuca species Festuca Festuca glauca and cultivars Blue Fescue Fouquieria splendens Ocotillo Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca Hesperaloe species Yucca Hilaria ri ida Big Galleta Lomandra species and cultivars Rush Lo hocereus mar inatus Fence Post Cactus Lophocereus schottii Totem Pole Cactus Muhlenber is capillaris 'Regal mist' Regal Mist Pink Muhly Grass Muhlenber is dubia Pine Muhly Muhlenber is ri ens Deer Grass Muhlenber is species Grasses Nassella tenuissima Mexican Feather Grass Native aquatic grasses including native Muhlenbergia species, Carex species and Juncus species Nolina Beaucarnea recurvata Ponytail Palm Nolina bi elovii Bi elow's Bear Grass Nolina species Bear Grass / Nolina O untia species Prickly Pear Pachycereus Stenocereus mar inatus Mexican Organ Pipe Pedilanthus macrocar us Lad 's Slipper Pilosocereus pachycladus Blue Torch Cactus Phormium tenax *** New Zealand Flax Portulacaria afra Ele hant's Food Sansevieria species Mother-in-Law's Tongue Stenocereus thurberi Organ Pi e Cactus Yucca rostrata Beaked Yucca Yuccaspecies Yucca Perennials Abronia villosa Sand Verbena Artemisia species Artemisia Asparagus species Fern Asparagus Baile a multiradiata Desert Marigold Berlandiera I rata Chocolate Flower Coreo sis species Coreo sis Dianella species Flax Lilies Dietes species For tni ht Lil Eschscholzia species Mexican/California Poppy E ilobium canum Hummingbird Trumpet Euryops pectinatus Golden Euryops Gaura lindheimeri Gaura Gazania hybrids Gazania Glandularia spp Verbenas H menox s acaulis An elita Dais Lavendula species Lavender Oenothera Spp. * ** Evening Primrose 2.78 Specific Plan 03-067 963 Penstemon species Penstemon Phacelia tanacetifolia Purple Tans Psilostro he coo eri Cooper's Paper Dais Ratibida species Ratibida Ratibida species Ratibida Salvia species Salvia Sphaeralcea ambi ua Desert Globemallow S haeralcea coccinea varieties Scarlet Globemallow Ta etes lucida Mexican Marigold Tetraneuris acaulis An elita Dais Zinnia acerosa Desert Zinnia * Species that are prohibited within certain areas if the project as depicted on conceptual PBS barrier plan. ** Fruiting varieties limited to trees designated for active farm -to -table growing at least 500 ft from any western project boundary; ornamental use is prohibited. *** To be used only at residentials and courtyards. Note: - All native wildflowers listed in CVWD's Lush & Efficient publication can be used as seed mixes or planter pots. httus://web.cvwd.or2/conservation/lush book/index.html 2.79 Specific Plan 03-067 964 ATTACHMENT 5 ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND (E) EAST 679.3 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS (N) NORTH — EXISTING CONTOURS s (S) SOUTH — (W) WEST Q EXISTING EASEMENT DELTA AC. ACREAGE X APN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER - c EXISTING CABLE BNDRY BOUNDARY EXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINE C/L CENTERLINE — — - EXISTING EASEMENT C&G CURB AND GUTTER E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT - E EXISTING ELECTRIC ESMT. EASEMENT G EXISTING GAS EX. EXISTING IRR EXISTING IRRIGATION M.B. MAP BOOK EXISTING LOT LINE NO. NUMBER N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT O/H OVERHEAD T EXISTING TELEPHONE PG. PAGE 0/11 T EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE P/L PROPERTY LINE R/W EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROP. PROPOSED P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT — S EXISTING SEWER R RADIUS FIA EXISTING SEWER FORCE MAIN R/W RIGHT OF WAY w EXISTING WATER 766-070-004 SF SQUARE FEET PROPOSED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP BOUNDARY VACANT TYP. UG TYPICAL UNDERGROUND - PROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINE EX. GENERAL PLAN & ZONING: PROPOSED CURB SP 03-067 PROPOSED EASEMENT PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED LOT LINE N 49°37'33" W 30.41' N 00°05'52" E 25.28' 764-610-049 & -056 / GOLF COURSE // I� c) PROP. ESMT. PROP. R/W �- _42-w13.5' f� LANDSCAPE PARKWAY 3.5' 10' P.U.E. 5' 0.5' 5' MIN. 52' 25' 24' � .5' A.C. PAVEMENT 00 OVER A.B. PROP. ESMT. PROP. R/W 13.5' LANDSCAPE PARKWAY 10'f 3.5' P.U.E. PROP. PEDESTRIAN TRAIL PROP. CURB & GUTTER L PROP. CURB & GUTTER PROP. WATER PROP. SEWER 17.5' �T� 12 17.5' 13.5 C.V.W.D. MIN. SETBACK MIN. C.V.W.D. MIN. SETBACK TO TREE C/L TO TREE C/L SECTION A -A PORTION OF STREETS "A", "C", & "G" NOTE: * NO PARKING ON BOTH SIDES TYPICAL DOUBLE -LOADED STREET (PRIVATE ROAD) SCALE: 1" = 10' PROP. PROP. ESMT. 52, ESMT. PROP. PROP. R/W 25' R/W ADJACENT PROPERTY 13.5' 24' 13.5' **VARIES LANDSCAPE PARKWAY LANDSCA E PARKWAY MIN. 6' 3.5' 10. * 12' * 12' 10' 3.5' P.U.E. P.U.E. 5' 0.5' 0.5' 5' 0�0, 5 PROP. 5' A.C. PAVEMENT 7' PERIME MIN. OVER A.B. MIN. WALL V /l IIIIIq _ i_ _ _ -� — _ �� _ �I r - %% -- `�'7�i i _��- L -- \� - nT S o`v Zoo J0-00 THR�1J -0 �� �,� m 1 �� U lf`�j t- r\\��� UJ �1 ��iQ / EX. FEMA FLOG ZONE L� T�Ci�, \ p\ 1 � — — — — —III — — — _�—i—i—iTi—iTi—iTi—iTi—iTi—T n ( t, t Y \ \ PROP. PEDESTRIAN TRAIL /'IIIVA ANTI \ �o�tr �J J °1 / ���� —%i\ \ 26 �� C BOON Y �\ \ \ 05 III f / rrfi � 3 / ��> LOT "L' OIL rri �i ]] Iy �( �o I_ J/ ���\ �Q(� 1 s y J �, i ( �o l C� PROP. CURB & GUTTER PROP. CURB & GUTTER �4 /, ������ I f 1 aC ., N 89 53'26" W 1318.64' n ., J tr . Tin �N 89"54'Sd" W 820.00'- — — z, T��� i ram, �` —` %/G ��.-��( III r 1� P7 \- ( LOT „K„ _\ _ _ \\ \. `8i�\ \ R 1 .. �. �. z � o 1 k 19 kilik �� At _1A UNDETERMINED FLOOD HAZARD uj uj O /Ss Lu 54TH AVENUE , 41 V w w LL, LL, CITY OF uj O COUNTY OF z A=o5°57'51 LA QUINTA u z RIVERSIDE LA R=910.00' O 73 ~�k Q - zp AIRPORT BLVD. 766-080-006 Nsgo LEVEE23•.� Q,:s VICINITY MAP �_ \ N.T.S. — — — — - -------- 172 _/i 170 1 D1T "A h Cb �( x /-210-01 111 III F OURSE Lil Q�l 1IIjhII�� CVO R 0' 200' 400' 600' 800' SCALE 1 "=200' 17.5' _�� 12' �� 17.5' C.V.W.D. MIN. SETBACK T MIN. T C.V.W.D. MIN. SETBACK TO TREE C/L TO TREE C/L SECTION C-C PORTIONS OF STREETS "B", "C" & "H" NOTES: * NO PARKING ON BOTH TYPICAL SINGLE -LOADED STREET SIDES. (PRIVATE ROAD) ** OCCURS ONLY AT A PORTION OF SCALE: 1" = 10' STREETS "B" & "H" PROP. ESMT. EX. LANDSCAPE PARKWAY EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY & EX. R/W VARIES " 31'-37' PROP. PERIMETER WALL EX. R/W EX. CURB & GUTTER PROP. 10' MULTI -USE TRAIL J EX. CURB & GUTTER PROP. — PERIMETER WALL PROP. PROP. ESMT. 1 N R/W PROP. R/W LANDSCAPE_. PARKWAY 3.5' Mr Z 10, P.U.E. 5', 5' 0.5' 5' MIN. PROP. PROP. ESMT. 52' ESMT. PROP. PROP. R/W 25' R/W 5' 24' 13 ' LANDSCAN PARKWAY LANDSCAPt PARKWAY 3.510' *12' 1 *12' 10' 3.5' -- P.U.E. 0.5' 0.5' P.U.E. 5' A.C.rPAVEMENT 7' MIN. I OVER A.B. MIN. PROP. CURB & GUTTER J L PROP. CURB & GUTTER '1 I - PROP. WATER DTI - PROP. SEWER - 13.5� I 1.517.5' 12' I - C.V.W.D. MIN. SETBACK MIN. C.V.W.D. MIN. SETBACK TO TREE C/L SECTION B-B TO TREE C/L PORTIONS OF STREETS "A", "B", "C", "G", BOTH SIDO PARKING ON ES STREETS "D", "E", "F" & "I" (PRIVATE ROAD) SCALE: 1" = 10' PROP. PROP. ESMT. 52' ESMT. PROP. PROP. R/W 25' R/W ADJACENT PROPERTY 13.5' 24' 13 VARIES LANDSCAPE PARKWAY LANDSCAPt PARKWAY MIN. 6' 3.5' 10, *12' *12' 10' 1 3.5' P.U.E. P.U.E. 0.5' 0.5' \ PROP. r A.C. PAVEMENT PERIMETER ..5., I OVER A.B. „�„ WALL PROP. CURB & GUTTER-- ^ PROP. CURB & GUTTER 17.5' -1 12' 1 17.5' C.V.W.D. MIN. SETBACK _ T MIN. T C.V.W.D. MIN. SETBACK TO TREE C/L TO TREE C/L SECTION D-D PORTION OF STREET "H" NOTE: * NO PARKING ON BOTH SIDES TYPICAL SINGLE -LOADED STREET (PRIVATE ROAD) SCALE: 1" = 10' PROP. ESMT. PROP. R/W ADJACENT PROPERTY 0.5' A.C. PAVEMENT 7' OVER A.B. MIN 2% 13.5' iSCAE PARKWAY 10' 3.5' P.U.E PROP. CURB & GUTTER J L PROP. CURB & GUTTER PROP. WATER PROP. SEWER 17.5' 17.5' C.V.W.D. MIN. SETBACK MIN. C.V.W.D. MIN. SETBACK TO TREE C/L TO TREE C/L SECTION E-E PORTION OF STREET "A.. NOTE: * NO PARKING ON BOTH SIDES TYPICAL SINGLE -LOADED STREET (PRIVATE ROAD) SCALE: 1" = 10' 44' (EX. R/W) 30' (EX. R/W) PROP. PERIMETER WALL 10, EX. BOR EASEMENT PROP. R/W 44' 55' ADDITIONAL EX. LANDSCAPE ±69' (EX. IMPROVEMENTS) E/P 30' (PROP. IMPROVEMENTS) VARIES EASEMENT MIN. 10' 8' 11' 11' 12' 11' 11' 8' VARIES 10, RESTRIPED RESTRIPED RESTRIPED RESTRIPED RESTRIPED PROP. TRAVEL LANE PROP. PROP. LANDSCAPE PROP. MULTI -USE PROP. SHOULDER TRAVEL LANE TRAVEL LANE PAINTED MEDIAN TRAVEL LANE SHOULDER PARKWAY TRAIL PER PERIMETER GENERAL PLAN WALL OVER A.B. F PROP. CURB & GUTTER 30' (EX. R/W) SECTION F-F AVENUE S8 (SECONDARY ARTERIAL / PUBLIC ROAD) SCALE: 1" = 10' 110' (EXISTING R/W) MADISON STREET (SECONDARY ARTERIAL/ PUBLIC ROAD) SCALE: 1" = 10' 80' (ULTIMATE R/W) J L�.1 IVIY f7-fl AVENUE 60 (COLLECTOR / PUBLIC ROAD) SCALE: 1" = 10' AVENUE 60 NOTES: 1. PHASING IS CONCEPTUAL AND MAY CHANGE IN RESPONSE TO MARKET DEMAND. ALL PHASES WILL BE ACCOMPANIED BY THE ORDERLY EXTENSION OF ROADWAYS AND PUBLIC UTILITIES. 2. PHASES 2-7 WILL BE SHOWN AS "REMAINDER PARCELS" ON THE TRACT 38578-1 MAP. THOSE REMAINDER PARCELS WILL BE RECORDED AS TRACT 38578-2, 38578-3, 38578-4, 38579-5, 38578-6 AND 38578-7 SEPARATELY AND OVER TIME AS ALLOWED BY THE SUBDIVISION MAP ACT. 30' (EX. R/W) AVENUE 58 EX. CURB & GUTTER PROP. CURB & GUTTER EX. R/W L EX. MEANDERING SIDEWALK EX. CURB & GUTTER • ; . VVV AVAVI r0000VA ►AVAVAVAVA F IVLAVAVAVATA IVLAVAVAVAVA IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 39058 EXHIBIT DATE: AUGUST 19, 2025 REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION DATA TABLE APPLICANT / LAND OWNER CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT, LLC. ADDRESS 2235 BROADWAY BOULDER, COLORADO 80302 CONTACT GARRETT SIMON TELEPHONE: (970) 596-6642 EXHIBIT PREPARER MSA CONSULTING, INC. ADDRESS 34200 BOB HOPE DRIVE RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270 CONTACT PAUL DEPALATIS, AICP TELEPHONE: (760) 320-9811 SOURCE OF TOPOGRAPHY INLAND AERIAL SURVEYS, INC. ADDRESS 7117 ARLINGTON AVENUE, SUITE "A" RIVERSIDE, CALIFORNIA 92503 DATE OF TOPOGRAPHY JANUARY 10, 2018 TELEPHONE: (951) 687-4252 ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 764-840-021, 766-070-003, 766-070-006, 766-070-012, 766-070-014, 766-080-001, 766-080-002, 766-080-004, 766-080-005, 764-210-007, 764-210-028 & 764-210-029 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 27 & 28, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. LAND USE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE EXISTING DEVELOPABLE ACREAGE 384.4 AC. PROPOSED C.V.W.D. WELL SITE (LOT "BY) 1.0 AC. PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION (CALLE CONCHITA) 0.3 AC. PROPOSED NET ACREAGE 383.1 AC. PROPOSED PRIVATE RESIDENTIAL LOTS (LOTS 1 THRU 201) 91.1 AC. PROPOSED FUTURE CONDOMINIUM OR SUBDIVISION LOT (LOT 202) 18.5 AC. PROPOSED FUTURE CONDOMINIUM OR SUBDIVISION LOT (LOT 203) 4.0 AC. PROPOSED FUTURE CONDOMINIUM OR SUBDIVISION LOT (LOT 204) 6.9 AC. PROPOSED COMMERCIAL LOT (LOT 205) 6.8 AC. PROPOSED OPEN SPACE LOTS (LOTS "A" THRU "V" & "X" THRU "AV") 218.1 AC. PROPOSED AMENITY LOT (LOT "W") 23.6 AC. PROPOSED PRIVATE STREETS (LOTS 'AW" THRU "BI") (STREETS "A" THRU "I") 14.1 AC. EXISTING ZONING SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067 PROPOSED ZONING SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067 PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067 PUBLIC UTILITY PURVEYORS ELECTRIC IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT (760) 335-3640 GAS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (877) 238-0092 TELEPHONE FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS (800) 921-8101 WATER COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (760) 398-2651 CABLE SPECTRUM (877) 719-3278 SEWER COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT (760) 398-2651 USA UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT (800) 227-2600 EXISTING EASEMENT NOTES 1 AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF ETHEL L. HICKS, ET AL, AFFECTING PARCEL B, FOR ROAD & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED NOVEMBER 29, 1956 AS BOOK 2005, PAGE 328 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) 2QON RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC AS TO ANY PORTION OF THE LAND LYING WITHIN AN AREA 30 FEET EACH SIDE OF SECTION LINES, AFFECTING THE MOST NORTHERLY 30 FEET OF PARCELS A & G (AVENUE 58) PURSUANT TO A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, PER DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 17, 1959 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 32692, OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) QAN 3 EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, AFFECTING PARCEL B, FOR UNDERGROUND PIPE LINES, INGRESS, EGRESS INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1960 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 84414 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) QAN 4 EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, AFFECTING PARCEL A, FOR UNDERGROUND PIPELINES, INGRESS, EGRESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED NOVEMBER 14, 1960 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 97202 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) Q50' EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY COUNTY WATER DISTRICT, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 96508 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) 6 AN EASEMENT, IN FAVOR OF GENERAL TELEPHONE COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, AFFECTING PARCEL B & C, FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES, INGRESS, EGRESS & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 1, 1987 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 253363 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) QEASEMENT 7 THE TERMS, PROVISIONS & EASEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED GRANT OF & AGREEMENT RECORDED JULY 26, 2013 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2013-0360337 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. SAID INSTRUMENT PROVIDES OR ESTABLISHES A PERPETUAL & IRREVOCABLE EASEMENT IN, ON, UNDER & ACROSS THE EASEMENT AREA FOR RIGHT-OF-WAY, PUBLIC STREET, UTILITY PURPOSES & ANCILLARY USES. (PLOTTED HEREON) QAN 8 EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF CITY OF LA QUINTA, FOR EXISTING UTILITIES & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, AS RESERVED IN DOCUMENT RECORDED APRIL 30, 2014 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2014-0157740 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) (TO BE ABANDONED) QAGREEMENT, 9 THE TERMS, PROVISIONS & EASEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE DOCUMENT ENTITLED EASEMENT EXECUTED BY & BETWEEN CORAL RIDGE, LLC, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION, CORAL MOUNTAIN, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY & CORAL OPTION I, LLC, A DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, FOR INGRESS/EGRESS & WATER PIPELINE PURPOSES RECORDED AUGUST 05, 2005, AS INSTRUMENT NO. INSTRUMENT NO. 2005-0632449 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) 1 20' BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-4 (PLOTTED HEREON) A10' BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-12 (PLOTTED HEREON) Q10' 1 BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-24 (PLOTTED HEREON) Q10' 13 BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-12 (PLOTTED HEREON) (TO BE ABANDONED) A20' BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-25 (PLOTTED HEREON) A10' BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-40 (PLOTTED HEREON) (TO BE ABANDONED) 1 20' BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-20 (PLOTTED HEREON) A10' BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-19 (PLOTTED HEREON) 1 20' BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-19 (PLOTTED HEREON) A10' BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-6 (PLOTTED HEREON) 2 10' BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-6 (PLOTTED HEREON) (TO BE ABANDONED) 21 AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, AFFECTING PARCEL G, FOR UNDERGROUND PIPELINE & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED NOVEMBER 13, 2003 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 03-894301 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. (PLOTTED HEREON) AAN OFFER OF DEDICATION FOR PUBLIC ROADWAY & INCIDENTAL PURPOSES, RECORDED JANUARY 23,2007 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 07-0051513 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. TO CITY OF LA QUINTA (PLOTTED HEREON) Q10' 23 BOR EASEMENT PER PARCEL C-7-8 (PLOTTED HEREON) 2 30' BOR EASEMENT PER DOC NO. 2010-0273187 (PLOTTED HEREON) FEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION ZONE "X" - AREA OF MINIMAL FLOOD HAZARD & AREA WITH REDUCED FLOOD RISK DUE TO LEVEE AS SHOWN ON RIVERSIDE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAPS. SPECIFIC PLAN CORAL MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067 LIQUEFACTION LOW / MODERATE / HIGH LIQUEFACTION ZONE(S) NOTES 1. THIS MAP INCLUDES THE ENTIRE CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP OF THE LAND DIVIDER. 2. THERE ARE EXISTING DWELLINGS, BUILDINGS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES KNOWN ON THIS PROPERTY. 3. POTENTIAL ACCESS LOCATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO REFINEMENT IN FINAL DESIGN. 4. DEVELOPABLE ACREAGE EXCLUDES PERIMETER PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION. (1.7 ACRES) 5. SEE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR PROJECT PERIMETER WALLS, PBS FENCE & ELEVATIONS. 6. A BLANKET EASEMENT IS GRANTED TO THE DESERT RECREATION DISTRICT OVER LOT "Y" FOR FUTURE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE OF A S' WIDE PUBLIC TRAIL. TRAIL ALIGNMENT WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE DISTRICT IN THE FIELD IN COLLABORATION WITH THE AGUA CALIENTE BAND OF CAHUILLA INDIANS WITHIN ESA AREAS. ONCE THE TRAIL IS CONSTRUCTED, A LOCATABLE S' WIDE PUBLIC TRAIL EASEMENT WILL BE RECORDED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT AND THE BLANKET EASEMENT VACATED. v- o �- I 1, A tl 5 II 1 x 460.5 w �/ 1 (� ��- ,.(/ V�jp .45 f I r����t�[�L_/•///.°' \\ J�/i II /� `�I �- 11 I I► i I 4 1 I I v 48 , x 460.7 �" I I '`/�/`/JI V / 4 u I j . 461 J x 461.2 � / x 461.2 o o 11 I y `�. / 4 4 457I..4 1\ // G x 60 0 x 459.8 `IL- - yY--' -% \ �= I0 0 \ -�5N --�_ 1 -1- MH = I \ - - Jl- - - -x 55.5 JT- /- - -.�Z m ri i ,4z -- - - _ - -2 � - 1. J i -,--� a - _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ - -IRR�f - -- i- OFF- ---------- ----r --- --_ _- - - -- - - -- - --- - ° VE � - �- - - - - - - - - - - - L �\ EX. PR CT B�OUN ARY & C�4 FM _ FM �FM .- S S ��� $ S O S S x 4 3.2- W W m W W W W W W ' 7 W - _ 53 �- -ter' r F - �- - - -�I r- = N 89°56'35" W 1743.92' - IPP- �4 �- - - - - _� JT - JT 1 JT ---+6e-- �� -� - �\� ' - x 4s4.6 744' x as4., I , -( / N 449°37'33" W�3y0.41),-t - 0 0 // d J \ \ \ 93 463.3 � �Z / t_ x�459.1 �459.5 69,443 SF j ..� .,\ L% x455.4 / 5�\ x4�a.6 I.III� �I(P.Id5'52" KI /8' \ / / `\_ \- A+ 1 00 /N 00°jyp0�5'S2" E 25.28' (f/''j�} -11 Lc� ♦ ` -- '� \ �J' �� _�� J/' �( / r ✓ x 458.4 ' � / ,2 (> - 4f"� x 4�4.7 /t2. - D / A- A- I I {�' 0 't✓ \ 0 I\ S. �Ei {R30D/.�yON�13 DAl Y) I f / C � � ) I ( / ( A (i 1 �asa.z II I O 0 C) l ) �, -? (� (- I J \,\ ,- �,�-) / � - - - - -- I �0 ) A2 A I 1�� I 0 1t�5. ,"INTMA� F-t60D�IdAZARD / /�� r/� o - - - 1 l� I I � 0 x L. ) 457.4 n / �� / / ( ��#59.3 �6 SF 459I yj/ ,- �8 \ \ ' I ` I'1 ( rr J� x 453.7 _ I0 ,- � I\ I\ \ 1L r `��`'� t / /1 I �\ \ 1 I I 45I e \�c �1 \ / -) // 1 i / I ( I .ass.61 20$ ) II / � 1 � � � / � \ I X LOT LINE 1 1 E1 \ ) .� .e / I \ . 0 x 7. i \ COMMERCIAL 1 I / /% J - ~ / \ '� PRO P.U.E. (TYP.) 298,015 SF / II I / / 56.2 \ '� ) \ / \ . 4 4. 6.8 AC. - - I � 45 / / /� R- 2 Iy� ✓ � / \, I m 1 1 764-61056 49 & //, �/ / 1 1 1 �. � „'X„ ' �S I �8,Y17 SF i �21,393 SF . r \ ` } LOT "B" 766 070 014 I t� I I e �45 2�EDU /RIS,K `� TO LEVEE \ j 1� / \ y�� 42,140 SF VACANT GOLF COURSE / / e ~ 0 % ` l�i 456.2 - / / _� \ 1 1 % �16912 SF , IIII (` l'� \ 1.0 AC. - EX. GENERAL PLAN & 45 // j \ _ x 455.8 �J� 57.6` \ ` \�J v "y / �©q5g.-q� �\ I x 458.4 f x 6.8 / JV-ry x 56. 3 \ I I II ) \ \ / ZONING : II I I f I / 7.4 \ \ \ \ l J\ /!v V J x 45 6 /J x 45&. " \ ` \ \ 'v r ,. Q41'7.4� I / , , 3, 64'�n`-,� a I I k\ �) \ S P 0 3 - 0 6 7 �\ � 'I I j® H /p 4 \ 4 --- \/<( � � , \ �// f ���(,/y'�' r'�� ^p) IIy\ 455.4 .s \\\ � I / / / \ \ \ �� �.2 \\� 45 J 2 J ( ,� D (i Q 4/ I ( !O T F I /� 1VJ' ��--\ x 455.7 'I I I I I \ x 453. I '' I III x 45, .a / i / // \ / '� / 3' PROP. PROJECT BOUNDARY & l d I \ \ \\a�� 5 �� xo4%. I M. I ) ss.s14,82a1� ��- �\ \ \ \ m :� d J II 5 .Ih I / \ �H� CV C 453. �' �x�'i. 6.1 ,S / 2 \ �1 I x4 I \ �9, �l I\ ' % � K C� 48-4 S \ I EX. R/W / 1 -, \ - _ \ � � � 4 a O �5���\ I x4 s.s I1 � �%4 6.z 69 , ss.a I I �4 I 1 SF y \ \ // - j x ' - �\- _/ 3 I ) � EX. PROJECT BOUNDARY / 3 °� \ • \ \ \ \ ` O la455 . a a b ' , ;_ s I �� ✓ i I / �^ r Q�. \ % 1 x as3 s� 1 Lei 1 /39' I // /11 G = T S 1 \ \2 787 SF I' 1 Z\ I \( � .�' �9y. \ O o y 1 EX. C/L / ®e� / \ \ \ \ \ \��\'�- z D�F �� x 454. 'INI0 I�-� 6 \ \ I ® / -52-; \\453.3 (01/���� ° \ \ \ \1 ��"�� Q454.4 i� `^ �/ rn .4ss.a .ass. ), L 14,�3 SF . f�N�, \ I x454. `\ x452.6 xas IV°°�-N o x455.5 ) ^ �' \ y4 'z4 s 1 PROP. LOT LINE 4 I \ / / a \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \ � (\� v/ � � f i v \ 1 \ �� 1\ x �� o � \ �, �4 ` 5 x as2.a x 4s I // \' \ `5 ' \ \ \ \ I I I Y \ \\\ <x J454.4 ��4.7 W, .4 \ \ v `�:. �/ xA4�4.7 ) 9 0 �.��. \ \ 4 4 11 + 1 I // \ / v V l (,, -' , 15, 904 SF : 455.0 x 45¢ 1 \l v /- � -✓ xass. ^ `/\ I ^5! .1 \ 1 I � \ \�\ x 454. � � � \ \ S \ � ^-�' 54., ,1�[1�, 1 \ a \ \I I `a� > \ \� Q 4.7 15 8 3 F / \-' / 1 ' ,-J ® ti o ' 53.3 LOT , ,, f .452.6 ` %IW\ I / 6.8 C OO1 G \ �\ \\\ \ J a \ \ x 1 <� \ x 4 .7 x 45 �1\� ,O- x 454.a `.� , 4 \ / i 50,480 ° \\ 1 i 1\ l C /� Q j / / �- l J � ' -ems �5 17,293 SF U 1.2 A � x \ \ 1 �� 1 / `\ / / �\ � � 2 S \ \ \\\ �� " \ \ , p 1 ��4}l 6 .i J 766-V / 0 x� � \ / � � \ \ \ \ ^ x454.7 1 \) \�/() �- x452.3 //` � �� / VACAN W �\,.\ _ �/ \ ) \ \ \ , , V`�` 5:N / 1 O lr , 45 x455. � x45. x /� x45,.7 , +, O ® zz EX. GENERAL PLAN &a ��> L \l I \\\ 1 i �_ s3. o �6 �\ \ 7 �+s�z \ \ \ x4 .z J \ / I o ' 7 457. 1 (I \\vim\� \ \ y� /� \ \ D �- QI 1 / \ G J ® --\ \\ \ 1 0 l - �� J x 464., �� (Q \ 452.5 CYO. &I E .4 d.7 > ! l \\�\ \� gssz.a ( II 1 R SF ✓ /\ / 17,361 SF �� \ \ \ �T 61{V 1I / / / / / x 457.5 S,\� I /���4�. \l`\\\\\�\\i\1� x 463.7 // {� � `,\\ - A y \ \ /lJ ) I1 �� `"� \ \, \ i t �ti \ \ � ) J /\ \^ � 1 ° \) t \�f x 453.8 \ / \/ --,-\ l- 1 1 45 \ \ 1 I �((/�° / �N I �\ � x Y ���\ } I \\ \ \ \ ` `,� \ ( ` I 1 J \ \ l }I'•.7 S� 1 J ��...� \� \ �453.z x 452.7 J \_ ( 1 \ \ ` 11 U ® v s.a � aso.sl -4c� J� I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ' ��' \ \ �` �\ �� \ ) / �� \\-� 54 ` i � // as4�8,304 SF �( a5 \ \ / ! - s \ II \ 1 I I I // 0 1 ll� I \ \ \ \ \ \ � Q�, �\, � S I Q9 S \moo I , / �, tia \ �r el x450.a t +\ \\ I I d \ / 1 �8.7 I I 1 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ r \� \ 21 /� \ x 458.4 N / �� \ \ \ / x 456 (/�'� /�4 y� \� x .........I - /J (� I k 1457.3 ` \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ x 452.7 \ 462.6 ✓ /^O k x 4 . �5 ., \ x 452.2 , x 449. -056 � // / e458.2 r\ \\� \ 1 `� a,5s`F- I I `� s S`� 1 / \ 764-610-049 &�\"cci u \\ `�`` -\\\ \\` l `\ \ �, ti� \ f ��� 1 I I �18,88�1 SF ,\ J �9 °o L �4'r / ''l \ \ \ C �� EX. PR JE T BOUNDARY & V1�� � \\ - - / / 1 \ L \\ \ ( �. \ / ,U- i\ 5,2 � .4s . \/ L\,s3.a \" .4 3 2/,2R7 SF,O \ �� \ \ GOLF COURSE ✓ ' / LOT LI F c 54 - l � ` ^ � / e l/ \� \ � a 51.-)452. �� \ J I/ I I I / \ ;> �5� 1 3.3 4 \ 1 45 .3 0.6 AC. / ✓��y $\44 . L / . 4 8. T 22 \ \� �/ %%�5.� 456.1 \ G 451.2 \ l �+ x 450.8 / 0 4 1 } x 1 / \ e1 \J > \I 1T Ob6 SF I lr �\ / 455 i, \ > I 1 \ � 54. \ / \ � , �.45 / _ \5�7.3 ®-/ 16,901 SF \ 1\) s \, (yd \ 4 .7,jII� /xi� \/J\ \\ V 1/ 1 ��53.3 ,i/� ` \ / / x449.9� I \ 766-070-014 / �x\45 / Rry\�/7 o �''� ` (� 6 \ 1 \ I �/ 4�1.6 I �e 57.2 ' L4., �\ ` 0 .z C9> 4 .a / 1 I '; ,\ VACANT �� ' / .- '� x457.7 \ (�) �I x45,., \ \ 5�/ �p 2J t 2.g 3 ✓ -/ x45°.4 J �w EX. GENERAL PLAN & \ -- i 1�, /� d� \C_ ( n\r - �� 2 \ 1 I J �4 / / C53.2 2o,297SF o \ \ '� I N° �\ ZONING: \ -1R- -- - - - R 7 �_ IRR- J ❑ +D 7 l / - - - \ _ _ - - / / / \ \ �__ ! (\� � \ - - / / �= / - / / I / / / /-/ � //// z / // / � - ---- / / --_ �- - - - _ - /\� �\ 1\ �� � i C �� \ / \ / , --- � \ � (\� -� Qz \ � 11�1 ����� f �-, � � -� �457.2 x456.5 .7 ( r` � , x454.3! \ �! J \ \) �O - , 3 ' \ 1 7 ( E GEN RA L,AN & / -` \ O J I 449. I w `'\� SP 03-067 / 1 \ / 4 �x ( \ \ / ( \ \ . aso. 3 8 SF �� b\ \ % l ` �� Z Q' I N / I / J �� S S a5,.2 �� �� �` N \ \ \ \ \ ° 0 / �` 4 A-/ I J f i / / I, L0 ` `�_ \- r _� .1 Y\- x s,.s 1 x 4s .a /v', `\I o. s� I A \\ l \ \ \ \\ I o ,- \ / - \ \ \x / 2 1 A \ \ 44 . lP . ss.s1 I I '1 \ , c / / / � �� x aso \ \ \ \ \� r / -� T L / �\ t- /- x 4so.7 8 O �-( 2Q,080 SF �\� 1 I �\ \ a4 '`\ \ \ \ y\ \\ \/ -6, /� / 1 I \ , f-_J LOT''J" % I 4a .7 as t \ \ \ \ \ \t` \ \ \ \ /\/ ,- -\\ L\ I 1 I `J Tr J \ \ ) .451.8 1 ` 24 \ �O \ ( I x451 �OLF COURSE 50.2 �\ r 448V� .5 x449.9 � �1 44 � \ \ \ Q/ \\ ° 4 n I I r � � \^ ( x 1 "08 &F \ \ ` \� s 401,358 SF �' \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ �\ A- I 1 f ,(\ � ! \ I 9.2 AC. x 44 '� \�, x 4 I \ i°�r \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ I ( . x 453.6 .,. \ U^ ) ti 1 / MtbP. 10' P.U.E. l) \ \ (/I/ / 5 4 / `l~�S \ / 11 �� \ x 451.2 ( C9 ) / I - \ \ \\ \ / I 0 � `` \ - ,j / - ✓ 1\ ` -/(�\ � L - \ \ �9� \mot 2., 1 (TYP.) \� ( 1 \ 0, \ \ \ \\ \ \ /�) x 450.2 III \ \ ,- _ \ \ // 1\j 1 / / i 9 5 � s \ vl 1 I I 1 \\\ \ \\ \ c� / ( � 1/ 1' � O� � " / ---�- \\\ \ " � `-�.- � / 1 I 1 , 19,121 S F � Oo �� x 451.2 / 1 x 451.6 S 4,94,1 08 SF �, \ \ T 1 / -t� /(/ ,"�.j () l� //� \\\OT1' / / x451.3 1 \\ •o. ��� I \- n l"('52 �1 \ S> x4 7 1 I /l ` \�_ \\e �� l / 55.9 x 6.3 "� �r l- \ \ JJJ �/ l \\ EX. FEM FLOOD ZONE 'o I ` -J 6 \ - 1 - 1 ` _J q r 1 f r� \\ Ou I J �j\I r� ` titi \ • , \ -� 10° \ ( I ()I \ 4 I // \ ( &I, 10 SF v �. 1 _�x�5o. BOI/y�'}`IDARY xa5oz rp I aaaa I \ 4 V / I 1 Q \ \A1� \ J //- 1 -3 I x 451.0 � E, �,4&0 �� r �_ l C�, I I I / \ I IIP \ + \ R S \ , \ \ o \z 456.2 45�. 6 �'� \ LIL\\" \ / \,j/;\ I 1 \ \ xaso.7 cP9 18,66 SF �.6 \\ � � ` x45°.3 LOT „L„ q� I I 1 I LOT "A \ \ \\ \ \\\ \ \\ / ( � / J /5- \ - /) \j z \\ 20,203 SF \ \ x 456.6 1 53.9� � \ - \ 1 I �` 1' \ � J , I x 451.5 C /� --- - �� -- 1 \ \ \\ > � �450.� ��O 0.5 AC. / 4 _ / \ I� - 1 \ \ \ \\\\ \\ \ `1 / } `\ �J/ -1 1 � \ / \Sy, 7 I ]1 x 450.3 x 449.9 . /"` \ \ \ �- �J . ass. / / \ \\ / 1 ( ` J ` . as,.a . 4so.z u ) \ Q 44a.a J1 /1 /fix) {�` \ \ \ �\ \ - iila - - - - 4ss� "6.� t '\- L\ \ \\ �- // f 1 �� ,6.44 \ i- � P50.3 x 449.6 x 449.0 _ - - �� I \ 1�1\ \ �\ \ \ k 44 \ \ \ \ \ C \ 4'S4'� 20.00' .as� �\ �� ,� \ \ f/ �� � o.a , 7 \11 �ks,.s r ��'' p \ \ \ \ \ t J- � ) .a Ilj 8,31��C7 $ y� \\ 50., X`\\\\ \ \ �/ � 9. � ,i � r �A' I ,.3 �� / / \ x �^ ( ^ �` �� \x 45, 4 / / STRE•• � / 5 I x 446.,7 I I �\1 �j�\ \�\ \ \ \ \\� \ - -7 0 x �s6.6 f\� \ ) \ � V- / I 7 x 450.E 1 -/_"\' >> a' - � / 0.3 ? \ \ - \ \ ., \ \ \\ G x ' -' 'ems C 1 � �. \ \ `�// 5 / f -- I, I ~ �,.°\ J C � �0 28 h / ` \Oo � x� ` � x 44X1 QUO / - 48.3O I I � 1 \ 448 \\ \ \ \ \ \• \ \ 4532 " ) � / .452.1 E L .as,.6 OPROP. L P:j�'3 16,1 9 SF �s I 4 \ 44 \ \ \ / \ U �.y J 51.3 $ ` ° / \ \54 \ \ 1' 1 ( j '/ x 1 �1" �s,50., U _ 1 \\ �\� �`' .449.2 LOT /� / / 17?F \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\ \ \ © r \ \ \ .453.5 ✓ \� _ x 449.4 x 449.0 .4 �j \ L �� Q /"� j x 4 1.8 . 449.3 ` 44 35 . '���`ti � �� (e,� � -�r � "(1 . aas.7 \\� \ \ \riot 1 \�4 AC. / � 11, /I I � ) � x 7s� \ \\ ( \ \ \\ \ \ x 452.1 x 450.41-11 x 449.6 \ _ 1 \ a > . 449.a .4ss.7 \ \ � i I < � - � � 16,772 SF \ \ 4 a F�_�Iy// � .aaa.a 6= 4 i 0 \�(\ o \ \ ./ IQ455.1 � � - J C] �-. x a5,.a� , �� \ \~ \ 1 . 449.2 �� 1 9\ \ \ a \ \4 2\ \\ \ \ \ ® 0 1 I y' /// \ \ � 1 \ 453.2 451.1 ---,-"� / ` / -i -_ x 449.2 I ^ `Y \ \ \ \ x 44 \ \ \\\ \ \ ® 6, \ \ ,.// \( \ 45e - u \,\l x 448. I V "� \ ( x 453.7 \ \ l � / , i � � - 4 j rrxW47. J I 1� l � I �i \ \ . L /. � - - 4sa . a4a.1 Y \ - . T_-� r 11 %\ \ - _ \ `- \ \ - - - , / �{ /� / \ 17,460 SF _ - -t �-- °� a (1 �� \ , \ \ \ / a `-' \ J � � I \ \ \ -\- \ • 4fti&' \ \, \' i �� \ \ .�\ / `- V/ x 449.4 � + 1, .448 I 1 9�21 8 SF \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ I �I I � e0 / _L 1 7 /� J I \\ 'I-,' -� ` x 445.7 , �/�a . 455.8 I \ \ J/ / / \ \ ( x 44T x 449.8 ,- \ \ - - - -., / l J \ I \\� - �7\ y`\ - l \ , . 447 s " °. \� \ \ \ \\ \ \\\ \ \ / ° "U ° lll,,, \ \ v / ° ' \ \ \ \ f l � \ - J \ \ \ / „ xJ4�� �\ \/� \\ I '�tiJ .448.7 \ \ \\ \ 6 \ / / \ Ir (4H 1 ^`7 J /I Q\ �L I I \ \ \ 451.7 X 1 \ \ S x -0 3 4s 3�1 ` - \ ` G'0 / \ / \ v.� \ .I, x 4, \ � \\ \ 44 \ \ \\ \ / �\ e _ �- 1°\ \ J --� -/ r� c? 17,316 S- \ �i \ - -- /n, \ \ ��4s,.3� \i �x 7 L IN6 \ \ \\ \\ \ - \ \ C / - 1 I I \ \ J \ - `\` . aSo.Y t \ .� / / „ / 1 \ \� > �� 1 98 \, . a V \\ \ �\ \ \ \ \ - - - - \ - \lJ ,J x453., \ \ / \ / ' = .i \ \ � � ©�45,.5 ��^ \ �o \ / / \ 45 .y\!� (\ 1 I 19,VC/9 SF ' \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \ / V .4 5517 \ 4 , 7 , /// �4$0� p _ ---� \ \ Oo. \ - / \\ \�� /� U� y� /)� �qI4 7.j _ � ^ 9 \ \ \ \ \\ \ \\ - _ _ ® - - � \ \\ / - - _� ( 1 \ .2 \ \ \ �� \ \ , , _ �� �' \ <\ �- y / , \ �` ��I.4 .4� �' `� 1 7.a \ ( V� �44 . \ °�S .44 \ \\ \ \ \\ �� -�- \ . 452.7 ✓ x 449., x 448.7 448. 7, `/ \ I- \ \ 452. f -� o. / \ .� 1 197 \ \ \ �� \\ 1� 449.5 �- x 44s 2 ---r ----44 2 50.1 / \ � - �., . 455.5 I 04 \ \ � L3t'F52.3'�- / V^ .4a o \ � \ \ 1 7 \C � / . c \ �'� \ .4 .7 -- \ \ \ � r / II 18,8145E � o �` \\ \_-�\ \ -� �� \ \ � / J �� ©t x4aa \/ �I1 •I ti0 a�, \ t �\-- \ /' / x 451.2 . - a \ \ / . 452A \ .� . 449.6 . 449.2 33 � (/ / \ \ , � � \, J�' I �' \ Ji \ \ \ \ - \ \ \ / I qq4 _, ` . 449.a \ \ j �\ \ S \\ �' \ \ o '� �&J32{SF , j / / / LOT W \ '� \ � �� J�/� �l �� 1 I X� cv6 / x 5 0 \\ \ \ - \ 0\\\ \ \ l / \ \ \�\ . as1.a v �) P9.s \ L^ /aa . / 32,57& SF ` \ \ I 196 \\\ a� \ \ \ / \� I (((''' .� -- ) - / / / ( j 0.794C.\ ( \ \ \ EX,L--LINE 19,125 SF \ \ \ \ \ / xaas.4 \ \ \ 01 _- \ xy«5 // \/ 45 5 \ x 5z.8 � f49.1 �- I �� 451.1 \ a x 445.6 °�\ Q� \ I II .452.6 �\ � ° 1 �\\ x 449., T � .448.E L / i Q ` \ ,\ \ I I -`_���"�� o L���� 115 \455.1 � / / � \ .492.3 \ \ ( \ \" \\ \ / 6 ` // 4 / /l�c �\ \ \""F 'M�i OOD ZONE „X,f \l//II y `� .446.4 J� \ \ 444.6 O x4 \ "D \ \ - \ �° Q �ry O �� CJ SCAL \ 1 \ \/ 51. \ P I �53. ' I x 449.8 1 x 449.2 l x 9.2 \ \. f/'' \\�� �S: 1 ° O `� ��//((-� P / \ \ l \ �y4 x i19�%T n I �� �4 8 \ \ / n I \ \ < 1 2 I \ \ O ° O I -/ ' -� 145 ( , \ ^ O C \1\ I ./ 11Y11,,874 SF 3 /( / �' \ L > '� .�♦ � I / r 20 69.�+�£.2rx�a5.9 \ \ °� ° � Q���, \ a SHEET 2 [ \ // X'Ss�a ,�-, v\ / f . �2.4 11-j�� \ ,V "\ \ A \l / 0.3 AC / / �� \ a � I ♦ ` \ I ` \jq . 46. \ \ ) Q� D / 56.3 x 455.5 8 x b15.4 x 451.8 2.3 \ \ \(' l \/ 91 C \ 1 - 2 `! \ x 448. / \ / \ `4--�., \ �.i / / ®F47.6 a �3 220 ° �\ \ ` a47.5 / \� P \ \ \ LOT "G' L ,,"\-/ / - Z'\ �� - I�. -- - ►/� I I I/ � ----- � s = _ W a p ®44 \ \\ 9 CC 1 9.2 j /\ / .45,.8 \,- \ 42,654 SF ��7 \ / / 447.6 x447.z �'"�49.4 I I �447.1 �- \ �' I � \ 44 -.,\ \ ( C { PROP. AMENITY LAKE 7-- \ \ 1.0 AC. J } / _` \ \ / / �� } ��\ �EMA FLOOD ZONE "X" / IIII ^ 1IIIIIIII194 \ \\ N, \ \ w'1 Y\ x 449.6 \ / / / x 44s z / � 48.3 / , - 19,253 S FF a \ �'` 1 y� a.6 "4 x 44 . 44 � 0- / ,, III r --.. � jj�1 � / I-- x 446.7 4�., ',,\-,, � � � 1 � z2 \ \ \ , t l\\ 1 l � / � � 1� �� � / - / I \ .452., \ \, 34 11 L���.7 / \�/_LOT ��u���,I I\ I\ \ \\ 0.5 AC fS7F / / _�\ IP. \ \II I 1 f J / \\ \ I .aso., 0.5 AC. // / -\,---,, �,- s .a P UOE. TYP. \5 \ I 11j1I /asa6 / �( / -- l I I \ \ 451. , . - \ x 449.7 8 / 447. . 447.3 . 447.1 \ -- ' \,- - I I I x 444.1 J ( ) \ \ \ \ \\ 111 I 11 I / 1 I I d� / - , \ �`�/ - / \ rr\ / / x 445. \ 1 I 1 93 . 443.9 \ \ IIu II II I \\ . 5. \ - / 0 (- \J = -t8,759 SF v 2 \ x4 4. \ 11 i I O� / , // 1 / '414 71 /j \ 456.1 T--rT `�,' (z 1151.8 / - \ ,'� / \ \ \` `/ / 44I5 �47.3 L. 9.5 I I J� 1 /,/ C � _/ ) I � \ I V \ U r -, . 455.� / \ \ \ ;: 452.1 < . 451.9 4 9 n v � 4%. � x 446.8 x 446.2 I I (� 22 C. Q \ 1�\ 11 1\\\ \ / / / �447.8 / / $mil �r / / _ /1 1 \ \ -I \ t \\ \ � \ / T / x445.9 \ \ 4. \ / / N; �\ f - I -- - II l x 454.4-,�- �) ,� \ I I x 450.3 � x 449.,I / x LOTy¢"�2O" / -\ .443.7 \)l 1 \\\\ \\ / / \ `f \ \ I / J ( � ' \ \ \ �\ \ \ / / \ .8 9,9597SF � � \ 11 Pf 1/ .445.4� 1� I .9 192 \ N \ \\\\\ I I ' / ' ♦// I �� / I \�� -./ \ ( \- %- /\� - , �' l \ � as2.2 \ \ �� / // \` \ \ 0.2 AC. . 44s.7 . a4s.3 �� J 1`I x 44s. � 18,785 SF \ \ s I \��\ 11111 � /I / �I / 1 I\\I\\ ` . aaz.4 �� \ ( \ �' 1/ 1 I l / / ) J \ V \ \ \ 443.2 ' 456.� \.55.8 x 451.e x 449.a \ . 446.1 �... \ / ) \ 4 �' - f � I `; � \ � ' / � �rRF e .. d \ III � I � �� 22� � \ \N � � � I III III r ,�// �//�1' 1i1-4( � 1 II) �� ) � �� I�`I �, \ \ � / / 448.2 / x445.6 O❑ \ A 4'' `\l` III ,( J`\J --�'�J I , . a52., . 951.7 .446 \ ,., � . aa5.6 r z3�- � \ � � , I,\ II�� r'A / / JN'�� �32.\ fi x 446. 1 j ) \ LOT .. P„ �45�1 T- - 451.8 \ \ \ / / \ \ \ � � x 443.6 / I \ � _ \\ � Il / .6�u � �V 3\� � � `\-, � \ \ / x4V7.a GOLF COURSE I I ` 19I� /�� o� \ \ 1 Imo\ �(�(,� �!� . ���� ss.s II P�� < sz.o \ . ( \ J\ \ \ 0 \ 2,565,652 SF .4a3.s .443.s 18,786 S\ \\ > \ \\ ( ` ��\ \ I) y (�'�� 1\�\uI�/ I� �x451 8 _�� .45,.8 .45,.6 I \ �\ /-// LOT ��Q�� \ \ ) 58.9 AC. .446.2I r� / 1 \ ^ r� i \\ j \ 1 ) r\ \\�\ �� \� // / Il i \ {�_ u Y \ \ \ _/ / 8 325 SF \ \ �� / �jry22 \\ \ x\ \\ \ ����fJ /Z .a2 . /�((� �--\I�/ �?1�-�I\\/ \ 0,2 5 \ I - x 445.8 x 445.4 x 445.3 I F, Q \ _ \\ \ 1 \\ ��i//, ���/// \/ 766-0/0- 5�6 \ \ / \ K �% \J x443.5 \\\\ \ / V ��� / ��\1f- I \`�/ \1416.1 % x 45211 0 x�771--� e J I � \ x 449.3 / / t \ \ '1' � \ f I l `8 it \I � \ \ \ \ � /J I Iyj �I'AII�'pIII/ \ // / l � �r ��� ..�� /V- \ x451.9 �451.9 x4 VACANT x451.9 I \ \ / / .6/ x448.3 \ 7. C f / I \I \\\ 4a \�\ I I / IIII I, I \ \ / x43;.7 I == \\� \✓ y / - I ffX. GENERAL PLAN & I '/. \ . � J \ `1 I - %- � / / \ \ x 446.1 l IP ' I ` \ \ 1 I I \ \ / l \ " %�/, \ ZON�dG: 203 \ \ / / \ LOT „S„ 16, 48 SF \, \1� \ \ \ III II I \ / _-��� \ �(// �i J L- 1EE� --- -453 S P 3 �0 6 7 . as2.o / x 44s.4 �aa7.s I 4,418 SF �I ' \ \ \ �11 l x / / (� \� �/ �� �� I/ L - J \ \ 162' ) _. J \ 2 \ ass \ \ \ I I� I /� ���L�n7.a \\�\ l ` f \� 55. ll x 452.1 r� x 452.1 x 451.9 �/ - x 51.4 l \ \\� \ \ 44 . \ \ 1 x 5. / 4S\ \ (9.2 44 ,9 ` \ \ \ / / I 0.1 AC. 2 aaz.7n \ / \ 1 mQD6'/ �J a � x �1 \% �\ \ as .a \� J 1 S► .445.91( < x443.4 \ 1 \,, 1, ,�I IIIIII Jr �r\��>>y ���� `� 1 x 451.8 x 451.8 x 451.6 I \ 9.4 \ / \ x 446.1 x 445.1 I 189 \ \\� III,I \ 1 111 I I I �� x 444.7-� \\ /\ -- - / I7 x449. \ / . 7 x447.2 x445.1 18.6 O 16,505 SF ` \ 1\�\\\ \ \ \ ` III\ aa9.9 X 1 I III I I.436.4 /� / �� ���14 F ) �� J \\ \ J��- \ - \ �452.�� \ . 445.7 '^1 � 1 � - IS 1 1 - 1 1 I I I / I I / �� J��" \\-- \ \ \ -� \\\ / x 452., / / / II �. . 443., r \ \\,,1 I \ J /' ' / e^� \/ \ J _ \ I 1 \ \ x 445.5 r ISO �442.8 11 I- \ \ I\ ( I x a43. \ 1 1 / / \ //, � g4g.g // 9 4� \ 1 \' -7 j ( � II . 442. \\ 452. -\ x 45, .9 x 451.9 II J � x 9. \ I L J 111 \ \I I III I I I / 1 \ 1' . 41 1 I 1 /�� / J \I / . 452.4 , . 451.7 � I �t/ � Z 1 � 88 \\\� F \ \\\ \ \1 1 I 1 ll I I I I 0,/ (.% � \ //� 1 / ( � , �/� /4 / \1 / `� /- \ I I . / '.Q' / / __- - I - - 16 44SF - _ _� It 1 / U \I / / 4 / /� \ / I(Cxll `\\ �� / c t�- �44,1 \1I \i \ �\ �\� \ :, . 455.5 \� �1 �� -- �// / l> / � I .a45.9 � `\� 764-840 �21 .a42.9 I1 ^1n �\ �\ 1\11 1 1 1 1 I I I III I / \ II - �� - /� �/ \ .aa 7 \� �-�� �� , ` III l 7 \\ / �_ ,- I d � d ��� y! / j I J vacANT = \j I I I ��II 1 I II���l /\ �J� 1 II . 452.1 . 452.1 . 451.9 . 451.7 49.8 44 ? / I C _ I I / Q 1 �r\ �,/ i /- / / EX. GENERAL �AN� 187 I II �\ 9 �/-,� 1 I / \\\ _ I I / / 1 j ZONING: 16,342 SF I III x44.51 4 I II // ( ( � /' X�� .43 . , \ / \ � ��� / L Z 'a5.a . aas.z /1 g-/�- x 442.9 x 4 6.8 �� 44 \ x 440. I / I,/ L ^ ' x448.8 x448.3 I �/-.446.8 I I f ) \/Sr 63-067 J¢�� I k I I II I I �' I � 11I I�\ % ,� \ ^\/ //I / 1 :: (I I - 1 ,I , _ 21 I II III I III \ (�� , �� � _ 1 _� I // , �� 11 x 455.3 , ► s .14 \ I � � I „ I I 1 I .i / � �/' ,/ ,� /j�� -�, ' f�� I / // ( ( I I x 443.6 c =443.2 I I I I I I I \ I V 1 I I I I / x� l / �\ \\�`�� 1x'.4/ / / J1-( �/ I .452., . a521 . a5,.7 . 5,.6 I 186 I I I I / �/ �C SEE SHEET NO. o / / I .445.911 .443., 16,075 SF I III I I II v ��/ /� / l 1 I // � / \ I 1 /1 1/ \ z / I I I �_- ' IIIIII II \ I ; I 1 L x 441 x 441. / / - `X / / � x 430. \� / / x 447.5 445.5 H I � \ � /' ' �� { ' I 1 � - �1� /Z'r a 11(1 ,( , � t I 1 I , I11 4 � x446.4 � �1�/�j/^ I/ � / M � -k432. � -\ ,x 1}5 , / r� I / / 6O 94 RF } ' 1 I I I I I III < (IIIIII I y\�c } i�` ^� / (�44),3 � \ I / / (/ x 449.6 / / -q- 1.4 AC L I I 1 1 x 443.4 ! x 443.3 1 8 , I I I I I I I r I A 44 I�. I x 44 61 I\ \ \ / \ / �� I / I / / / / / / � /� \ II / LOT ��`n,�� / / .447.6 1 I �-J/1iN1 t7F I I J%i� 1 I I 4 I / i� / -\ - _ _- _ VY 1 I / IIIIII\� 1 ��� I //`/:{p26� l a3, 4 x 447.5 r- �I / I Y 1 , � 1 ,', d � ,(04 . ll / / / ( l7 AMENITY / / I ^ / I / �IJ\ Ill �\ I I II \ �/ X 1 I / .aa2.2 // / / / X / `� aas. I Xl / I ) x 45Y 3 x 451.9 x 451.9 / / L ,- `- 1( x 443., / ,-�, \ "I I I I I I I I I IIII 1 I I f I( I I // I / I I I / 4J �-��- I 451.5 I / ' x 447.2 804, 02 S F / �� I r-CIO -� 184 / � I I I I I 1 1 I I /' )I 1/ ( I I �\ �\ -\ x 429.E � , as .3/' x 448.2 T - 18.5 AC. `/ . �N ` x 442.7 2. /' 21,224 5F I I . aae. \ 1 \ `\\ .44� , � \ 1" \� \ \ -\ \ 5 PROP. M.W.D.0EASEMENT I / 3 I I 1 I \�\ I .aaz.a _ �� \\ �-�x 448.6 /x 447 I a � PRQ�C.V.W.D. EASEMENT 4 . (TY✓ III I , �,� \\ 1 x446.6 4a,.s ,Ln OP.10' � P \' \ \\ \� \_ � 4 -- �i I . 4b1.9 . 451.9 . 4b,./ / .448.E 1i '� Si a42:B.. \ \ x \ \ i 1 I / a x 44 8 11 \ / - r- . 447.3 ° --�rrll -- -�203 I \ I \ \1 � ' /1 (/) - _ /, x 448.1 \ \ \ \ I I III I \ I 1 II\I I 1 4 1 I // \ "\ \ �_ \\�� x 4 3. X/ R- - - - - - IRR- - - - - - - IRR - - - - - - - �` R - - - - - RR - - - - - IRR - - - �r IRR - - - - -�- - - - - - - - - - - - - -�. R- - - - - IR - - I = o �� � - - - .a4 s - RR - - - - 1�3 ' JF- y� \ - h-�,,� \ 1 �\ZM� -� ) .aza, ' - - RR RR RR I I �� / / //// \ x z.6 /� \ �/ r /h- - - - - - - �- 445.a (1: � - fi - S_--- - - - - _LL - � + I / /i` - . 462.3 / ' �- a49 1 II s -' x aas. V.- / Z_ - - --m-Ir - -) ��_ 209' (�11\ $ I� I I I iij�//� .3va7.a- � \ \ \�\\\ - \ \ C I L EX. LOT LINE 1 1 / ---/ - . aaa., - - _ l \ /� �� 1 11 i - \ \ \ / �'" �� _ ` / / Ex. LOT�LNyE 10 .443 18189 SF I 1 II II R� ROJECT''BOO\ - \ \ \ \\ 3 \\ \\�� 1 I / � / - \ /// 1 ' ' 1 I 11 � N I I 1 j as . EX. C/L x 444.s - - - - = . aa7.z - =a.z, \\ \\ I- \\ \\ x 451.8 x 448.7 x 448.3 . 449.2 . 447.a . 446.s . 444., x 443.a II 44\ \ \ / �� -� \\ I, Ili � i iI /- �� - - \\ __� . / / m 1 I 1 I ( 22a I Iil EX. R/W l 1 / / / / x 448.1 � x x 445.11 1 I I I I 446.1 x 444.3 W I 1 I I I I I 1 I I// \C \\\\\ \ \I //x 451 x 449.4 x 8.4 1 I I Ili, x 447.2 - 55.8 l \\\ � x 452.1 . I x 449.2 , x 447.3 x 446.1 /1 `�( I I x 44 182 111� I 1 / x 447.2 \ J \ \ /j \ I \\ x 451.9 / / 11 1 1 I /I ' I x 4 .4 .446. / / 4 .5 / I �x \ > i \ "460 \ / / I �� � \ 11 6 1 I 16,886 SF y I III n i° I III j / ( X�.449. \\. 4. xa / - I I I �I -� A' 1 I - I as I� / \\ \ . aas.a I II r = 1 1 '1 / 4 a L \ / / / � III I � 11 1 < . 444., � I I r I"., I / / I _ S x 451.9 Cx 448.9 x 448.5 y I x 446 2 x 44 . 1/' I x 448., x -7.9 - x 445.8 11 \ I ) I1�1 L. I I 1 I / / - \\\\ - � x 445.a V LC 'AD" al \ \\\\ GOL COURSE / 4� I III 11 PROP. LOT L11��TYP.) 181 _ - I I N II I I I I �l� I /'�',/ / % = 4 x 446.7 x 446.3 I Q I M I II \ o \ \\ x 93.1'�\ - x 444.E I I 11 1 I \ x 446.9 /�1 \ \ J < "� / / / / I 1 11 I 1 ('--,-�16,613 SF _ ( . I - - . 452 x 452.0 x 451.8 2 / -\ ` / J I I11l N / -\ �4 41I NI II 44/�- \ iI/ A .44a.4 I r I11N1 225' � = 111 i I I I II I' / / :�- �\ � _ / / x 446.3 / x 446.9 - " �� 11 `�'p I I // I I I I / -� � /' 1 y5 - / il'x 447.9 .447.` I \ � �✓ / � /� I (I I �i J I I / :,� // \/ 1 �� � - 99 .451.9 / . 449.3 .448.9 4 .2 - 1 ' 1 � ���� / \� \ �� / \ / / � (IIII \ 1 /1 // I T I Q I II 4 .' / '//�/ , l I ( \ % _ � / `/ aas.s - I 11�, Y F\ , I' r/" d 3 I I 1 I III / \\ i / ��\ * V �p/�\J ��" / `'���J//�/ � �� x 448.2 1 I I J-2110-�x 443.7 1 1 II / / // - \ / �` \ I / �, - \\ -jIQ / %- I 7 _ I � 1 I I I I ! / / � I �/ � 435 -z /J I / / l' 1 � o J 1 111 I . a.7 .aaa.3 V�CANT N� 1 I I I1J1 I I IIII I ( \ // ' .a2/ I / \` 1 1 00 . 451.8 / / I x 448.7 1 - ya I I I I I I I 11 I I 1 ( ��))/" �/\\\I /\ / � x 448.2 �\ ` it I 1IEX. G E A L F� A N & I I I � I�(pI I IIxas-�) V .i/ �_�� \- NG. I I 1 / I 44I I , // / �► I I\ - 1 \ l I I l I I .45.4 I ///J \ p (v /F/5 1101 / f-- / I x 447.8 x 447.7 I► S I M%d 2 0 I I I I I I Iy IIII . 1 �(- /I \ \ /, - , / )I I I I x 446. 11 1 I �J �� 17177 s1F� 11(( I I I Y I I 11 aa5 - am\ \ x 43, 9 -1/ %�- ,!�//�LOT "P" PROP. LOT LINE (TYP.) 11 III 1 xa3�34zI /j Q .45,.9 OLF COURSE - I II I I I I 2 / '- ^ \\ x431.5 I 11 2 / / // I x SI.2 x 450.1 x 449 2 x 3 I , I x 444.4 I �J ICIO � / O I o ��� I I IIIIII // //�I l I / l I 1-��`/// 7 j ---J// \ `�� \ \ _� /_ - J x 433.8 I / .• '' / / `� / / x 45 9 . 449.5 � x 448.7 :.48., 1 I I! ( I I ( 1 II / 1 I 11 l / \ \ 432.1 C I // / I / /\\ \ 1 103 / - . 446.0 447.5 I I I ( I 1)II I I I I 1 I* as 17 I N/ 1 1111 �� I / / G - 1 I X - x 432.6 .as2.2 / DROP. EMERGENC416,VEHICLE / ��es ) I III / I I �II III 3 III I l / it \ �.44s� �\ / .azi.5) �,�� \ / h FIRE TURNOUT LANE I I I `� I \ � I �� ` x 452.4 x 450.1 x 45 Im _ 'I- I /// I I %// \ f 4 - �_ �zz / - I r - no1/�� \ 111 /I/ I� I I/11 i�I \�\ �\ _ I,% _�_ ��/`� TT� \ - 1 1 I t 1 /ll l I ) /\ �� r--�'¢- - _ 456 "`i J �,/ / z . 449.8 . l - i t I I 11 I I I V ) 1 ,x - ., y _\ \\\ \\f �� / / / I / \ 98. \ I I 1 I I / ,/// I / / // �� x 32J. �// \\ �\ �� _ 443 X .452., I / / III I I / 1(/ / /� \\ a4s13 / / x 448.3 I \�\ \\ / / - /// // I \ x 437.4 I \ \ I/ �\� �\ x 441.5 766-080-004 / . / .447.E . 446.6 II I LOT "U" \ 44 \ - - I / .�sz, I xP� P.EMERGENCYVEHIC�ALCESS& P 1 �a's i4�''7 \\\\\ -� l l Ill l / % // .�azs I � �\x, � \\ /_ � > x442 IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 39058 EXHIBIT DATE: AUGUST 19, 2025 REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 52ND AVENUE 0 9 AVENUE 60 54TH AVENUE CITY OF � LA QUINTA Uj Ln zp AIRPORT BLVD. tia Rv� VICINITY MAP N.T.S. 58TH AVENUE AVENUE 58 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE J w w V) ul SITE o r � o IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII z Y O ! Q 60TH AVENUE ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND (E) EAST 679.3 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS (N) NORTH - - = = EXISTING CONTOURS (S) SOUTH (W) WEST X Q EXISTING EASEMENT DELTA AC. ACREAGE APN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER c EXISTING CABLE BNDRY BOUNDARY EXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINE C/L CENTERLINE - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING EASEMENT C&G CURB AND GUTTER E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - E EXISTING ELECTRIC ESMT. EASEMENT - - -G EXISTING GAS EX. EXISTING - - - -IRR EXISTING IRRIGATION M.B. MAP BOOK .. - .. - .. - .. - .. - .. EXISTING LOT LINE NO. NUMBER N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE - - - - - EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT O/H OVERHEAD - T EXISTING TELEPHONE PG. PAGE 1)/H T EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE P/L PROPERTY LINE R/W EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROP. PROPOSED P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT s EXISTING SEWER R RADIUS - FM EXISTING SEWER FORCE MAIN R/W RIGHT OF WAY - w EXISTING WATER SF SQUARE FEET PROPOSED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP BOUNDARY TYP. TYPICAL UG UNDERGROUND - - PROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINE PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED EASEMENT - - PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED LOT LINE - \ / // EX. GENERALVACANTPLAN & / q ATER/SEWEREASEMENT I I x 7.,1 177 I����\�__� l(�'I l //44/.z'/ l 1/l m � / r 11\ � ,\\S 3s. )� %��� ' F� W, -� m M / SEE SHEET NO. 4 l l %/� 11 °� I �� / )j� J / �/ - - / ZONING: / / . a4e.2 - I I 444., \ ) / / / / / % / -) " �rl i� - x447.7 x44T,- I I I I i1 I I 1 ll�l /1 � �/ I I , / �' �/ � ✓ /�i �� oo' 200' 300' 400' / I I_� �/ x452.2 SP 03-067 / / I� I I x4 x444.3 1 l / �/� ^' 1,//// / 111 ��/ / - 1 x 446.8 1 x 7. I / / / / / I 3 l I l / Ili '// Y! � � \ x 439.8 \ � ���' l ;;; \ / / / \ III / r / / / / / I 40 // I �/ �� 1 I x 428.7 © Copyright 2025 / I I 176 / / / / 4% .4 / / x / 4 f 1 I % ~ SCALE 1 "=100' MSA Consulting, Inc. / )� I I I I / '/ �',/' I `�J/ � I ��� 1 /- \ I 9. i i ��( . I I mil l l . l i ul,�l /l/ , �/ ` l %/i �1 \� , � - i��. I I r r , \ \ \ U c a D c 0 U Q a N a 0 Q O In 00 �q a h N O a 00 3 7q 0 00 LO a cM ul L N 00 LO O r Iz 0 W > .b 11) 0) C c 0 EL Q Q eM LO V) N I\ �S -� --- --- S- M��-�-�----+ -- ��� / ICI \ ��Ii� ( r'j -' �� I,-, \ j �\ ��I L �O \mot �'sz., \I IIIIIII\ if/ :7 / - _ S - M a M/� - _ - R/W _- �_ =-�\ III / / v/J / �� ^% �y / /\�� / j `) ` 25 \\ 9�. �\0 \ ` xas,.2 x sz xa5,.s x 479. - �� =- -� - N tiu ---Z �- 'Y x 465%-_ \ x 460.6 {('f�''f� m460.1 �j � J J \ ^-C v � / �\ / / \ \ / `� -1 1 / I I IIII� .� ` I i.^^..,....� x 459.5 \ C�^ �j55.9 <�456.3 ,V ) / J 1 � -- \ \\\\\ 4 I J i x � \ \ 50. ��-� n J r�} a56. 4 6�-Oi0 004 c� o P 1/ /[�` l ( \ \\\ x452.7`\ c\i \•P \ 1 �l I ( I x ��C Tx 458.8 I� V / �) 1l l \\ \\\\ \ f� f J,' \ px x450.3 46 J 1 I ^\ I x466.6 x465.3 I I I I ,� \D EX. GE L LAN & Z ING: xa5'.a % ° W t / r, 1 \ \ ,, \ l\\ I x451.° ` � I ' J 45fi.2 \ ( �, I ' } x 477.7 x 472.7 x 471.4 x 470.4 x 469.2 x ,7 45 . B I' \ ` \ Z , \ 1 \ \ \ \ .. � {I rF� �0. � S �13-0-. � // y ls5 ti L / 1 I- 1 26 , - � \I , / , q / 1 I 1 f x 460.3 a. , , �- -- / �_ , I , , � '� 4 ' [�'" \\ \\ - - / t' \ \ , l /) v 1 �, .2 \`,^(Z� 2 4 1111 I x 478.9 - 11x 476.3 6 -15 - T H R - 0 x 467 B x 465.4 /I ��\ 459.4 1(\ f �f�� L� x 456.6 r 3� 1Tj✓//� xx)53.9 \ � � \�\ � 1 r ` 1 J ^ I 1 x 451.5 (' 5 .7 \\ x 450.3 \ \\ J \ / III I I x 479.5 x 474.3 I x 46 // \� V _ _ Li x 455. Q .y \\ ` \ '/ \� �J/ c -, l� \ J/ �' ` x 450.22 J LOT "J n C V /\ III 11I a�4 - �� -� - - - x 3 - - Z 1 4ssss� x 56.o L / _ � �aOLF�.` U SE \ \ t II o x ass.a I ss., x ase.s 0 5 W 82 s x /4/s/� \I\ �� �� i � ,�\ Z _\ \` �/ (� /J/ 7 1.1 x \ 5,.5 \ \ 1 111 I ( ` - - -1� �� o , \ r 1� J- Y . �W}� l!/f/`� yam, -- -x- �� x 4EIQ.7 x 460 �-; -�1 COT I --� / ( � .1\ - J % I � �1 51.3 / \ x 49.7 �\ \� x 451 \ \- f 3 -��- "r �/ 1--� i-- - , -= -�-- /a T xa7a -� - o ICL`EAC S ` _ "\ texas z `1 ass�LOT 1�" �� x as 9�J JC \ a ( ( �� O,,,5.2 � PROJECTIBOU Rr�BnINE �. p /� / .%� -� \ \ \ s� \ ! l �� / �- 46 r � ~ � -x 455.7 T X455. 3� \a_ C \i � S � �� \ \ / / x 450.6 / 0 �f50 \ x 45,. o - \ - - - - - - - 4 ,7p0�1 C �` f' -� R = 750. - - ^r - l/ LOT iG �� N3tr�°7 7 �'- - x ' S �, 5 (I E 1 (\LILT °PROP. LCt�YP"r �9 \ \� -�� - 1_lJ`J ( , \ � -(� x'461.1 \ �/-' x 453 2 f ^ \ / x 452.1 x 451.6 5 .3 \ 1�4 �` ` _- -7- - -_�-_ _/ CJl _ 1?------�24 -_ \ x463.5 55,22ySF ��% -_--- xasa.� J ./ % \ / i \s,.3 \ �� _ l \ �\� \f \ u� / �� / j � J ) - _ J/ \ \ 1 �/AAC. O 4 p _ g00.0' - - +fis�- ) \ ) l ( \ s o.1 U \\ ` \ \ \ O% J ( / ✓ '"\ 1 �� 11 ' i'-�/ ®�70.1� _% \ \ �� / J � .2 I / R 45a.6 /' 457.1- 4� ��1a1�_ x 453.5 ✓ \`� " 1 1i J �q , 51. " �� l x 449.4 \ \ \ \ \I r � 64/ � ) Ij \ � l � \ � \ // i I J - -- .. � f_ - -Z: \3S . \-\ O - �� -----� � e x 4 ,.8 7 6 6 - 07 0 - 01 x 449.7 b x 449.3 \ �450) l o m 38,684 SF I 11 / � , i rxa7,.7 I \g�, - xas°= - -- � � .a�9�` \- ? v \ \- / I xasz.,� x � � VACANT \ \ \/� `` �aa.,'�' V\ \ l 1 \ �� a \ / ,L;i� \ �JI \ V\ ------- A �,'�" \5 J 1 <� -� �� x.. EX. GENERAL PLA \ \ l s '`9 I Il\\ / I 62( g 6., /4�5 29 \ / x 449.a ' - x� I / _ r ') / / 1 , ° 1 / � = 500.0' - / / I \ \/ 45s.9 x 4s5.7 \ '_1 7 �455.i� -I- - J L V� " ��l 1 ZONING : \ \ \� I \ �/ / I _ x 3. ` 6 4 LOT ��G�� -GOLF-C LVV:'k�L_ 7 SP 03-067 T �, { J _ -� -' �� p_ / _ \ \ 1 1 C- / x 478. / /." / 17, 12 48 co 7 , \ . x 456.41 . 456.2 \. \ ` x 463.7 \ \ . L 45 . 48 7 I � \ \ / \ . \ ` /j �� � . .x 40.6.1 � \t . - _ � \ �©487.3 I -� \l ( J J I ROP 10' P.U.. � ,� x 71 � f �64 SF 47 � x 4s,. x 4so.4 � � � x ase.6 I � x ass. 04 ^ � \, 30 \ I\ N II `� 6�_- \ �- \- -(� �` �o� c°�, 0,3522 SF P I 21,185 SF ti ��3.6� / 30> 944 SF \ S- 1 a � 1 �, � I \ \ -,-\- \ (�\$'96"F31 ii Z o ? 465.5 ) 46 \\ \ 1�\L TLINE / �f �AC I x4ss.s �J �1 \� \\ �/ �,y� y�-- ^ \ -- �„ \ � r -1 - Lam-- I� 20,61 8 �i \ ) ( I . 456.1 ~ _ � x 455.8 ( ( \ �. �_ / \ x 449.8 I � 1 I I - t , 3F `\` \ (a'6.4 f 1 { \ \ \ f 1 _ \ \ \� J / / x 464.5 x 459.5 x 45.1 \ 451.7 x 450.3 � �I\ 1 _ l l �- ) I »1 � 21,264 SF r \ �_ / I I � \ F4.11 0 \ \ r � \ ) / � l a 4 45 0 � I �a ( \ \ \ \ \\ �' 1 i � � 1 \ \ `� `„ I I\1 J f 11 ] \ v / `J F3 1 70 70, 463.3 r� 6\ g )offTI \ \ j -' \ \ �` c� \ 1 1 ` J' 58.1 I ` _ x 450. �0 • \ �i \ � l I _ / / \ S o \ \ s 7( 44 xa6,.s \ %5 < � PROP. LOT LINE (TYP.) ��9q• I J �4s3., \\ \ � / _ J }14s,.s \ \ / J ) ) rf' I � I l x4�7 /t � L S o ( c PRO LC� L IE\(TYP.) 23,370 F ,� \ 6�•. I(� \ - SF - \ 62p� x ase.a f I � \ � l z \ D � �"' �..- \ /j � , � I I I � } .� 3.1 I I x 462.3 \ 'P�.' `4 x a57.7 _ m497 6� C ( . A ' \ \ J \ \ \ \ ®48a.z \1 e o ` y1 /I \ I 75 FT NO -GRADE x 456.5 x 4sz.7 / / R.7 x a4as �s ` C1 II ^, I, Q 2\ �474.4 \ J x47,.3 1 I I / \ \ 43 \ .\Fj,,CC ��-as6.s s -�--\ BUFFE \ \ �4sz. S Z '_'' \ 4 I\I \ I `� 3V �/ J f �}73. II % x464.3 8 22,556 SF \ k�xas .2 xas.s \� I \ \ xa4s2 ` _ \sa., \ I 32 2 6 S� ��/I. \r 1 d / / x 455.5 tX 52.3 \- Frr, 450 / s� \ II I x62.6 ' ,,� I 7.6 1 ��/ I b' .�� 1 �� x 45,.2 �i\1 / / J x 44�:9` r/ 1 I� \I �� - V Il' // J T Al / & x 456. / -� \ I � \ \ x 4 ,✓ \ � I - i, 1 7 �% ) � I j y I \ ry I \ / (l \ ( �L/ \ /x 452/1 \, 1. �\ � x 449.11 33 ��jr / S /x 449.6I 448.2x 463. x 461.5 \/�}` -\Y �1 �1� 1 9 SF I �7 6' o x 466.5 f x 465.4 / / 42 \ \ i x a66.3 Q x a57.2 \l ` _ J'�� \ ) I - \ c \ � \ j\ `\ SEE SHEET N O. 2 -- / x 6 < i ��\ III III\ a IF I O L J ) 20,962 SF ??? �\ - p r 4ss.9 > U \ /�i I x� \ \ \ x451.4 J /a4 . // 1\ / rJ r �I l U �y C 1 7,84h SF 1 r I I \ 9 - 463.5 \ l �i., \ \ I \ � \ \ \ x 448.8 �11 / 0 1 x ® a3.4 \ \ 3 ] [Y r x 462.4 0• ��� ® �\ a59. \ ` I\ 56., jj `� -'� x ae6 1 ` I I x a62.6 // \� \ x 5 \ f- � 5/5.0 � ( `\ lr L i III 111 J � I 1 I i 1 I)/f� \ 1 \1 v � �455, J </ (j - / � AII �/�l 230� �^ / x 464.E t/ A 4i 459.9 I I \ > \ I F7 1 ` / ^ / / x 4FS2.3 \ \ ` \ \\ �_ / 1 �579 SF / 1 21 383 SF 4 ° ` \ x (7 \ x 456 1� \ / \ ` \% \ \ x 451.5 Imo& A53. , I x 449.a � � x 449.2 // 49.2 \ 44 . 1I N , 1 k I 1 6� ` J 3 III I J �� �, Ir �' I ? 5 365.7 I �, I I I 458.6 \4 8.1� ��..� \©456.3 I x 4s7 s \ 4ss. \ \ G' �\ C l � I / \ \ 2 \ �16,947 SF� C 1 4 \\ / I 1 1 ) 8 0 (A4 3.2 \ O• \x\ �\ �- >� G � L _ �-4(2.3 \ \ D ,4)511 \ / / / ( I ` III ! I y �' n 766-070-003_ (( 459.2 \ \ yl © 456.3 x455.5 a r A¢5"54 52.4 x451.a \ \ x 2.8 -� s k x44a.6 ( x�j}76.5\ ✓ I VACANT 4 ��@ � \ \ A 9. x457.3� x456.9 -� �` \ / \ \ x451.a /�-\ x449.7 / 1 1 \ /) ., A k�� 69 � � � � 1 226' I1 EX. GENERAL PLAN � � iiFyy � V 9.6 � �� \ ! \ \ � � 10� \ � / 7 / I r ]�(� 447.6 1 �,,� 7 � `� '�I I 6`996 SF� � � � ✓ � I/ ZONING: � � �f o� '��, \ � � \ � �- � /\ / ( x45,.a \ \ �37 � � / \ l \ 1 � 1 ��\� � � C 55 yv�\� 1� I I 1 SP 03-067 _ / j xa60.19 � y�x . \ xa5 45 \17.9 \ _\\ ~ -) X4F / /1 x451.7 1 \ ©. x449.6 'J \ ) .I // / �- � 1 7,309'Jr l I � x 464.6) r x 459.7 9 � `�\ / 1 y I\ x 452., 53 4 f / \ a �- I I ( I,�45 SF \ { / \/ \� \ / 53.4\ u I.7 \ \\ - � / 1 1 _ I I1l � \ � \ I \ 5 � I I I o - i \ N \456.4 \ -L \ �` I \ / � x 452A \ 1 x 450., ( \ \ / / LOT N , \\ \\ � I I , III Y � 7 S, -D c ~ I l � F � r �L c? `---,;;�-- - -�- _ AMENITY LAKE / 1 \ '- J - \ C / -`� \ I per' L:V �' �� \�� \ 56 4-11 x 463.2 9J \ ^ Y \ \ I I \ �\ 45,. \ x 449.7 \ \ \ / LOT n H n / / /x 447. 0,41 - L / _ T ' r \ \ x 455.9 -'--rT (x �}5,.a / / / �� 1�$ AC. I I I� o .�� 1 �17?390 SF v o.s �( \J \I x 4sz.3 / 27' 38 , r.7 \ I 11 ' \ /� , \ \ V �()\ \ / 4a . 5 'i � � 1 I �" x 4I 4.A o I- � � ,� \ \ 44' ) ) % / J x 459.7 I JtYr x 456.4 56.,�� \ - � � ) I\ \4\, s,.s 4 s � ^ v x 449., \ \\ / 71.s I J� �� �I I (� s 1 9- � 1' �� \ 'I l I \ \ 229' \\`p t / . x GOLF COURSE �r _ ( � 5 � I II �1 )v � ) \ \ \ ( \ \ I I' x 455.8 \ J x 454.4 / TT) \ y �- 4 x 450.3 x 449.11 \ / \ 93.4� II > 221 8� F / \/ ---� 1 57 S / \ \ J I \ /f , ( �, ' J \ \ // / !p \ o'--\I I I ( r \ L 37 19 . �456.3/ \ 462.2 \ \ \ / / \� \ l \> / \ \ � x459.3 I ` 25,978,5f� ��I 9 \ � // 0 \ \ / \ � � 1 I I � \ 1 � I \ { x 456. -x455. x 455.a /1 J x 451.a x 451.a x 449.4 � / �� )I I Q - ^�, \ r 6' J x 461.9 \ I I JO �V I% o\ 0 4 - \ / ` s \ % I I I 1 V ( � / f 1 (Q �/ 1\ x455.9 <- �- j �u�,- --4, I, - x)111 \ \\ \ x448 / / 44a.2 \ r�� \ LOT „O„ � 1\ � \� / r' III � ! I) I � � `� \ \ \ � � �58� � � (III I 3 6 � � � � �45�1 ) I/ �r�x 51�.9� ' x 8 �Y,/ 1 = � _ \ '� \\ x 449.E l / ` --\ \ \ \ o /W - 1 II i �4�i.sl / ,, `19,984 SF-� ��A1 � I I 1 22,722 SF \ .1 x455.9 III � J I '1 �t 2.o T\✓/ \ xa�)s / . \ \ 11 \ \ / .4 7� \ 1/ / 24,71 SF I u I !� \ I x 456.5 V y4s y - \ I L / J I � C o 278' I I \ y. Ito x kss3- 6., j �, I _'� as,. x as,.� \ \ \ / /"Cl!"\ \ i� fIA 117 p ®479.3 � PRO/P. 10' P.U.E. (TYP.) \ 25, 379 SF I-� - LY-��q�-� - J I \ ,, \ - / // LOT \ \ { /-\ \- z I I I/ I/ I I �I I I I / i J 0 r I - >/ 5 9 \ I x 4b5.9 / �� x 4521, G / 7 U U- 0/ V- x352T� ) I , \ x 449.3 / / / \\ 1 96' \^ I I //� ( / 21,968 SF x4s,.4 I xaso., llIsa., )) 3 ' x� VACANT \ \ / x - II I I I I I ( o / x459.3 I >> ,35,08�^I I x45,.9 /45,.9 'f GENER��'Q PLAN & 203 x// '6/ \ I r I -\'l I 73 � > f -- \I / j \ \ 1 I I I I I 2 074SF ( g 305' / I)I 7" ^' - / �' Z0N I-G: 14.OACSF \ \\ \\ / / \ \\ ` / / \ rr7.7 r l / 1 \ I I ( I \ / 1 I / x 456.E x 456.3 I 15 1-- -I--- �-,4 .3� S P �3 �0 6 7 _ \ \ / \ f _ I I � ` f � _ I v CP � �� /> L / / / / I I l 7 I 1 C 7.4 \ 1 -� I fI // 11 \ \\ \ \ / / - / / ( i I I I / / \ � � 6,,Q� S / I (� ' x 455.I9 S x 4b2., < x 452.1 q x a6,.9 I \ \ \ / /--/ / f 1 I I b f- J - o �- -� / �YJ I �� x461.4 � a 1 ) '�' - � ))� > � /� x451.8 \ 9.4 / \ \/ / q1g'171 rI x 447.2 (- S O1 6 � / \ � � L ( x 449.7 \ x 4a.a / I J` C I o I 7 ` �� o 1 1 /\ I x 45s.4 / ,) ` x 456.6 1 49 / 3 / I` - ` _I _ \/ 2�S,8.3 SF ,\ � \\ '� \ J x 462.6 x 4s0A G / 1 1 \ / I I �4sz3� . I \ \ / / � x 4 L / 'i } a I \ \ J x 452.1 \ ( I / 7 �`� I � I` {� � "�° ' 1487 SF � \ x 4\ x 455/ l \ x 452. x 451.9 x 451 9 ,I / 1 ( o � \ I i -:I-- II I I I 1 ^�' r /i r I - / J I x 4b2.4 %� I 299' x 45,.7 .448.4 .447.5 � � 1 V I \ \ ti \ \ �J 24664.5 I r � ) ) C- 1= - C� h /` / I / / / / ` \ I � 1 I (/ // I \ �J x 463.4 �i T x 455.5 , ) L J - - - / L. / / J / \ \\ III �41 4 \C: \ ~} p� I� I -- r - I x456.a x456.7 /�-/ U g M1 L� u 1 Q q I D%6 v / �- /-11 f / I I I `( / / \ �) ) / / / I LJ,65 F I L�/�(Jy/1� ' C / 18,168 SF x456.4 /x 456.2 x.5.7 q / x452.1 (/\ x46,.9 ,4 ., % /- / / / / II x 79. \ �� \ �G4'052 F . \\ \ / x 459.2 / / ��-/ /_ I I I / \ + / y i / \ 1 / / / / / I �/ x 448.8 � ` \l\���\ � �/ / / / / IJ� � I I 1 ( o � 1 J 0.6 A ..o J�\�, 0 241' / \ \ xlu � L - \ / ( I � I � ) � �- \ �� \ O _ \- ) x464.3/ / ( ) g� \6.2 -\ 1 I I / J \ x44a.a x44a.3 I I J/ // I / J I `11/(` I I ` � \ > I 1 11 / (�� \\, J ��q x 463.E L` ^J / �S / 1 x 455.9 x 455.3 / I v x N4 / , \\ \\ `\ \/ I . r�Tr-A J AI 2 I \ I O ( �� I\ \ 24,OV/oJK' SF x 461.3 x 459.1 I x 456.8 x 456.9 x 456.2 `\ / / x 451.6 I I / / L - \ I� ` / / ,1.17-15,2(72 � � I/ � � I I �76 � i p � � �) / / x 459.5 /� I \ / . Q / / \ o ///J ( / \ . / / Y. /\�./J �II I 1 5,28 F J J cy7Y \ "' - _ �-" o "1 / \ / - = I / / / \ I� �l / \ // , x 4 / ^ o . I 1 O� \ ( x 460.7 / 1 LOT "AD" \ 11 I / / N�EPTU LIDS I ° �, � - - \ \ j GOLF COURSE \ x / LOT "W" / / (\I �0 RIER YP.) 1 I I �7�.3 / >C�� - -g7 - \ / 1 3" 82.5 AC 595,733 SF \ I / AMENITY / \ \ I I I a 1 C 1 9 > V lV - 8a ��� xass.6 xase.e 1,026,014 SF / 449. 1� I I I` I ) i % , I I--c N / � B 8.4 f�'//L \ \ \ \ \ � I I ` 11 23.6 AC. x448.a 1 //)/)I) � \ \ 1 I � G ) I I x 460.3 I \ � � / / �I 1 I I 1 �� 1 `� 069.5 S � I I' �`I� 1 1 \ \ \ ( 11 I I 27,)514 SF/ / � �� / \ \ \ \\ \ \/ © - - - x 456.8 � / l / (`\((( \\ \\\l\ 1\ \ 1\ \11 I I I > / o ) 6 /A � � PROP. 10' \ / x 455.5 J x as§.3 x / \\; \ \ � � I / I I � M � ,1� '�9 � ( P.U.E. (TYP.) \ xaso.a / L. / / / \� \\ I I � 1 656 SF (80 av 81 x461.6 \ � / LOT "R" \\�\1\1 I` I I) xq7 51 �..% / f o ti 1�,g55 SF ti 17,645 SF�ti/ � \ \ \ - \ \ I I 5 - I I / 44 .3 / 1ll / ( I lJ 1 I f � 0466.1 / / 82 \ \ � I PROP. C.V.W.D. EASEMENT I / - 3 \ I 1 I ( y 32,605 SF \ \ I1xas6.2 xas6.o x44e.s xa47 766-070-007 I� �o ) - , \ T \ 455.6 / x44a.6 _x4 _ CORAL MOUNTAIN \\\\ - c I s / �6 , 460.6 \ \ / Lr - f - - - - - � / - - - - - � x 447.3 ` � �`1�� �\\;\\ ma o., I I I 462.6 \ \ \ 46o.z 6 I - - - - - - - - - - - - - IRR- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -IRR / R - - - -IRR - - - - -- �� --x�--------- ---- ------------_--------- --- 1 2' 88 88' 88 284' \ \ L "AE" x1 \ / / RR RR o r \ x 484.8 ' 46,.2 I 5 S F � -rvml -� / x-45Cr.8- + x- _ 0.8 A� - x 4 . . 1 449. 3 - I °-- � �IR4 t ----------------iRR- ----IRR- --- --IRR - 5 �IDD -----/ �x \ / t�\ I I I I � � f ` 1 L� EX. LOT LINE / / �� 11 �� \ I \ � C --// ( 1 Q / 33e�-�G-- 232' I I 128' (I xas6., PROP. LOT LINE (TYP.) I x4s,.a / / / xa4a.7 xa4a.3 �� \\. I T ' H�" PIMP. LOT LIN� (TY� �- II r J / \ ��\\�} I� I 11 i 0.8AC. j 83 nl I x459., /� II �, 20,202 SF \ 1 I I \ �1j/ �(/ I 11 _ / / ' I .449.4 x a.4 x 448.1 ( i \ I \ I / � \ � x 465.5 I I I f x451.7 / / I x 447.3 ll J 1 � _ r 29,902 SF �X. LOT LINE q / / / .sn.,�1 \� \'q /--, I, , I III "(� I �� I/ 766-080-004 / / \ , �� r LOT "AD" 0 84 x 59,\ / I VACANT / / A LOT "AI' I GOLF COURSE (1 EX. GENERAL PLAN & x44a.9 x44a.5 (\ ) 20,867 SF x44a., x447.9 ��\\\\ \ II \ � ( (111 I PROP. 10' P.U.E. 9�, I ZONING: / � ' IIII \ 5�$3 ' (I (TYP.) I` SP 03-067 1 / /'V, ; \ I \ \ d c% x 4 \ x 54 5.2 1 I I � 22� \ 1(7)2 . ) 1 x 456.2 _/ x 455.8 �� / 202 \� I� \ /> / / I \\ \ -Cy`; x 448.4 J F ' i� \I �� � I\ \ \ � / (` 6,�.c� I (I I \ 95 � / I ✓ / �x 455.9- I I x 45 / / � \ Alillikkk/ \�\� � \ 85 17,141 SF -455.5 f I / j �J \ VIIRO\'"l`"TLY ( �� I 17,047 SF \ \ �� �S6' l I /��; SENSITJ I RRfA \� ) ��ss.z� 11 1 59.1 Lc°1 I EX. PROJECT II I v ) �v / /I �g / / \ x 449.3 x 44a.9 9 l g / \ 17,403 SF 0 /�' 4fi5.2 I I 'L2 / \ \\ \ x 455.8 x 455.5 / / / 52.1 .449.9 .449.5 ((( BOUNDARY & \ 4 L }� - s\ 96 ( S ` / x44a.2 L ' LOT LINE f � I c. I(� 1 766-080-001 CO sJ x4sa 19,137 SF �s 49 �� jf 4 / �T I - i���� ' %Jj // ` I � `�\ l f f f VACANT 86 x45a� , \ I x455.3 ( 49' 49' / L- 100 x451.8 ~ / I � ) x44a.7 I j /� ��� �l ( 693 J � \ 1 I 17,407 SF 25 I I 7,684 SF / / W 1. /� f�/�����J J �I I o x Jf �� EX. GENERAL PLAN & x455.9 / / x449.7 x449.3 i � /Z/ / // / �f l `\ I I . ZOVNG: \ I PROP. LOT LINE (TYP.) I r>, II \ / �fj/ / ( 46 ap I I \ /\ �16 II SP 03-067 2 / l x455.I 18,315 SF \' x455.9 x 5.5 /x452.1 / �- o/�j/ / r l� 6` I �) 4� '�'�� I I \ 6 18,424 SF e / / k/ // x 451.9 O - � e` I \ I11 I 18,495 SF--\ \ ) I102 6� / / 5 2 45. x4492 11 1 N � / I x q. x LO .. P., fly // - \� I 11 I- / I \ \o A \ ) io o N ' 1 ,879 SF / / GOLF --P-' x44a.7 D 7 A � Il R `98 I ^ 104 103 / ,.Q /_ / f x ���ppp,I % �(/`" � � I � x ss.�I `� / 2� / \ 28, 88°� / 17800 SF105 N 15,006 SF 18,045 SF �, x452.2 h: / ' x451.s / 4ss x44s.e x44ss . / `7 JS, ,l { S ) I` \ 1 - I I ` 466. I\ _ ,7f' I \ \ I / t� , �' _ (\`{III •\\ �` / j \ r 4¢'/.166.4� \ ` ( 'r I \ I9 88 \45 � �/ 16 / 1 I x450.1 x45 . f /�� I I I 1 1 I 1] I \ 22 777 SF \ 7 I %r /// �� �I �N�� \ I \ ) �)l I I �/ /11 \ I\\\ A \ xas6.7 I1as6 � / �o�/ /� OP. EMERGENCY VEHICLE / / I 1 x449.e x I r // /� } ,-/ \ l {/ as a \ li FIRE TURNOUT LANE / �`�l ( �I �( I �\� 1 1 ®� - 46�.71 .11 Ix 1 1 I � 'I I l l , \ \ ��O D , �.• � - �, --� / / / / / x 452., `I I 69. 65.8' x 456.1 11 I J � / I I ) '\ I I Z� \ I (o i \ ' I \,,S O, � \ / -/ � $g S. 1 / / x 452.1 . 452.1 / (/ I .450.4 I l )�I EMP FL ODZQNE �IV (�J / I I x460.4 \ \' � �� a+9 92'411111, \ / / �' �� II o �� ���), J B�OU DARY� r }1 `I I �J I �f f l) \\ J 23,510 SF III � I 169' / / / /7 ri � - -- / /1l� 1 1 ��, 1 ��� ] I I / jI ,` ti� �� � LOT ��./ �. / / , I / .1 M x_,�.� �I 1 �q I �� I ` )I / / ' 1 \ III x a65.5 , • j 1 \ \ x 459.7 x 455.8 x 5 J 106 A5.9 / „ , x a62.2= I111111'0 ) 1J1f� I I \ ( � 1 III ( I � ( \ \\\ ( 14,774 SF 3,095 SF l / III � q - I 11 \j I (� ` ( I r ) 1 \ \ 20\,6402 SF o 11 \ 175, 35r I � xas2.z / / xasos / - 1 I / 1 I III / I � I1(1 J ) ) � I O l ) \\ 11 , 459.1 \ r�/ x 45 59B 1 1 1)�I I I (f �� I I L �- 1 ( ( xl1s.) , / I , ( o PROP. EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS & a \ / / _� ,( y"( 1 1111 I 1 °D l l�� PR P. L�T LI E (TYP.) G� 11 I 1 I I / I `\\ 91 I \ WATER/SEWER EASEMENT 107 fig' \ / �� / YJLJ / / / xa4s.e / } (l!/1/ 11 ,A I I I� �I � G �� I�� \ I f 1 / I (_ / I LOT b r 16,586SF cD`b \1 \ A x 449.2 ( `I l ( x 4so.4 19,752 SF ^° x452.7 x452.4 xaaa.a ��\ 1 �� \\ `` ` 1 � 1 � � ) ) I I / ) T \ \ '� I � "All"' \ � / x 45�.. 204' x45 1 8 \$ I I �� \ \\\I\`- � I fL I � �f1Ix451 X.�djLANE ) I C' \fix 19,333SF,0 1,262SF -- 80" I � g I \ ----� -- I -I- ' / x449.5 \\ \ 4 6 x 45a.. 17 6 F x 452.3 CO CEf� TUq�PBS` - / J \ \\\ \( p. `i ( I > I \\\ �- LOT K'; I l / \\\\ \� �� Il C BAR IEf� (TY ) I % I \ \ 9 xass.s 12,796 SF�OAC� �. 10' P.U.E. - \ xaso.s 4so.z ��\` \�\\ � \ zit \� \ II I' 1 I � 0 I I / I�-0,092 �° PROP. EMERGENCY - I\A\\ \ I I I \\ \\ SF �� I _ - - - - - - / /V�IATER/SEWER EASEMENTLE ACCESS & - ��I , � \�\ \ H.,�l ill I I I Ix 456.4 � I / 4� -- - \ ,� � / - i `\ \ \\ 11\\\\\\\\\� - / �� 1 J Ni'I x 459.6 \ \ \ \ 8S' x 456. x 456.1 / / I �I I I / \ x 450.1 \\ � "\\\�1\\\ � . �- \ ) \ ( a�/ � � ( `. I C� / \ \ x 4 a. / 109 / / A I 1 -// x 451.2 J / x 449.11 x 449.5 x 448.E \��\\\� \\ \ ` \ \� 12 \ \ x459., 1 x45a� 204 / / LOT "AN" I \ \\\�\\ � \�. \ % II / x4s9.7 \ ` PROP. EMERGENCY VEHICLE x456.z x452.8 I .452.4 o ll\ \\\\�\. \\ I 1 / I \ \ 458E= {\\���\\\;�>����� _�� �, l x460.6 \ \ x45s.4 130456.E ACCESS EASEMENT 110 / // 139 II xaso.a \\\\\\\\\ �`\�\=��� PRb� ° ` ` 1 6.� I SEE SHEET NO.4 \-/ IJ - \\\� I �I\� \ \\ ��.�� \% NVIRON ENT LY D - - - - - \ \ - - 46e - L�` -- � - ,04 V / �i - = I - / 1 �f/ /� 0�� \\ \\\\\ \\���� � r ISEf�\SI� ARE Q . ✓ �\ ` _ - _ - s�� \�� - - - o f _ - �� _ - - - - ~ �+ee� I(I//�/ I//l� \�: \\� I \ 080 002 �_ \ \\ L.� \ 'I��I (tll((� \ \��y\ \\�\�� ��-/ �� �\�\ \ \ x462.3 ( VACANT \�\ -' ) x4p 3 `�� x459.2 / \ x450.9 I III�� ��`�j I��� \l \\ \\�� \ x4 EX. GENERAL PLAN & ' \\s�\� 0.5 G x460.3 xa59.2 / / 111S . 136. xae: \ \ �� �� �1� 1 \\ �.� ��\\ \ \ V '� � $ � x 450.3 x 449.4 I I �� ��\���\ I ZONING: \ J/ - �SP 03-067 x46,.s `� x ,,.aFo ) � /451,2 ' \\ \\�1�10 .�� � 303,582 '\ - ,/ \\\ `- 59.5 � I /I\ \/I-.�� \l/ ` I \ / 60.5 \ \ LOT "AD" \/ x a59.a T� n r�11 / �x 466.2 I 1 �\ 1 1 I II may- \ \ GOLF COURSE o \ / x45°5 x 4Stl.y x 458.7 1 SEE NOTE 6, SHEET 1, FOR / 'T- \13/ xaso.s xaa9.E �--\ PUBLIC TRAIL PROVISIONS ) 1��1�11111 II I I l I / ^�� --�-� I `\` v I- _ �� / � 112 \ / �lii, 1 x455.1 \ x455., I I s,.3 I \ ® 11- �, �� III I,1 I� II I I 1 III I I \ \ \\ � \ / 'I, ) ` ` 1 x 459.2 x 455.9 455.6 x 455.6 \ I '- � l s \ © � \�\ ��1� 1 I �)��, i)IIIIII 1 1 1x\\> �' x 46,.E1 ) ` \`\�46,��/ / I \ \ ' I J - - - ���0\� IIl11)111111#�, (( I \\ __� Z xa5,3 \\� 1 I III �I I I1 \'\P\x 460.E � .2 \ \1\ 1 11 II NI0I ((I , �� \ \ 6 \ K x450.7 � �� 1)�11II� I,tIr �h��ll �>>Ii��Ii�1il I �� �- 1 I � � 0' S CAL SHEET 3 [ IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 39058 EXHIBIT DATE: AUGUST 19, 202S REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 52ND AVENUE 0 9 Ln Lu AVENUE 60 54TH AVENUE AVENUE 58 CITY OF i LA QUINTA Of COUNTY OF � RIVERSIDE zp AIRPORT BLVD. tia Rv� VICINITY MAP N.T.S. 58TH AVENUE J W W Of Of ul V) SITE o r -mk o z .i Q L F 60TH AVENUE 1 I 1 1 If ��� I CONCEPTUAL PBS I �) �11111. �' \ I \I I v - ti - � � x461.1 \ 14 113 I I 9.1 d l \ \ \ x45 3 i1 �)« ARRIER (TYP.) I , J �) I it ,, , ,I,,,,. ,, , 1 vvv , , <� x 46,.5 {,., \ \ � � x a59.2 � ( - - Ill )�� �1))11�J1u) �///I J�llli( , I / �� .9 \\J� xa60.9 x ,.3 `J \ / I I 5.3 \\ \\ \ x 5- x45,. x45,.4 x 50.E ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND ��iil/ / l� i � x 463.P I LOT "AH" ���YY� \ \ % x 460.4 1 c.�JF6�.3 � x 16 / s, / / //� /�/ /// 114 4F (E) EAST 679.3 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS /� / � L-^ �\\� / I 227123 SFx 46,.s x o.s \ \ J � - � _ � �-- / 7� I / � � \ \ \ I I ti_ � \ ( ( II l 7 NORTH = EXISTING CONTOURS ' Ili ��� I )I 5.2 AC. F ) \ X\\ \ / x T „AD„ 152 \ \ I Fis3x (N) OUTH PROP. LOT LI E P. 46,., - xa6o.2 / x456.5 GOLF COURSE \1as3.a 154 155 156 157 452. 15 159 160 \ 161 (w) WEST I I II 1,1111 ///" \ Il I 1 r-' �\ \ \ x4s°'4 \ \ / 11 I /\ Q EXISTING EASEMENT DELTA /\\ l J 1( x 459.E x 459.5 x 456.E I x 3.1 .452.9 X J � �/( �L�\ I 1 � x 4.4 I I � / L - � , i ) s. �� I \ I I 1 L I I I ACREAGE - - r> xa6 . � x�. x4s,.4 / � x4sa.4 APN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER EXISTING CABLE O0 r 115 /� I _ BNDRY BOUNDARY �� /Ill f� /(� 1 1E \ T\ /� I /` I I :n EXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINE 1 � \ � ZO E X , FEMA fL©OD ��` '-'-, \ \ � � r- x46f,.3 .2 ._/ � iI] Z MAI 1 ~ ` / \ (a I� x s 4 I 1 �� x455. I ` \ C/L CENTERLINE _ - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING EASEMENT a 1 ( �� ���� NNUAL C CE II ZONE X REDUCED xa6o.s ) \\\ ) } xa6o.3 xa�s.al I x 6.5 456.1 x455.6 5. x453.7 - _ C&G CURB AND GUTTER 1( �/ I f )J) l I x E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT -E EXISTING ELECTRIC � �\ �'I ( �11� ��lll fl( �1 \ FOOD �AZAR� l� LOOD RISK DULE T�6 VE -- � ,� /- -1 4 x4 x459.5 / 3.1 43 - - - _ - - - - - - - _ i)II��I(� �/ I I 1 I 4s,.s .- I- _� ��� x4s s• � \ \ xas,.s � -�so / -_ \ /� 151 - Lp - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EX. EASEMENT -G EXISTING GAS ((((I 1 ) ) 1 1 \\ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -B T�EE�'#' -IRR EXISTING IRRIGATION ' % f��1��) III(+�((�� I� jll °jII �11\ y\ I Il - 6 = _=__�- 's \�� ��� _--- -�� � ° - \ --- _ -----_ -- EX. EXISTING - '' ��11 I 1 �(I\�� ` I ��1\ 1-----��- =�J ----/ I���_= ti= i- v- Q ®4 -1 O\� �-�- - _ _ i �I %_=---_- = _ --- - -_� --- _ --- M.B. MAP BOOK -..-..-..-.. l %//1/�/// (JI NJ - i 1 (-� \ - - �\^ (-'� -iiiiiiiiiiii � \ fi LO' NE 4s7.s I -C � 3 0�( �/ \ rn�as3.z �- _�� �ae� ^4_� ^� � -� ) l r EXISTING LOT LINE _;� �� v \\\ �1� `�\ •��\ - - - - - `II mF63.6-- -�- \\--� �� �-. .>� � �� 5. 5- - -- - - _- N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE - EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT L - - - - - 3 `/` �. - _ NO. NUMBER _ �-� LOT "AR" _ y N 89' 42" E 1 14.92' x464.7 x464.9 6 � �` � x459.5 =°- x456.2 z-xa57.3 -� x4564 m - ` - vJ � 7 T o xas3.a O/H OVERHEAD - - -T EXISTING TELEPHONE �\ 11 \ _ \ - / a a✓ r� ���1 -1\ � \ 15'Q-_ _ I �,-`,�� � G PG. PAGE -o/tit EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE ((� i Il � \ 1\/_ _ \ x 463.E 466.9 117 \ ) 1 �4\9'3 x 456.7 x 456.E / - t\ q TJUND,& IN��� 1 \ \ \ l � \\ 7- -003 �� / / \\� \ 67 �) � / � � /` '�°�\/ '��•�/ I �I _ _ PROP. PROPOSEDP/L PROPERTY LINE R/w EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY �1�111 6� \ - x46 q IxF" P.U.E. P I TILITYEASEMENT - S E I WER 1l �\\ 1���il1 \ as4� \ \ 1T ^\// \ \ x463.4 - \ \�� I rl \ \// / �� \\ xasasa \\iI a . x az L� 1UBL C U XIST NG SE`i\`� I 1� L J \ \ I R RADIUS FM EXISTING SEWER FORCE MAIN 1111111d11���4 )IIIIIJI SSS>S �� Ali ��111DI1 11 \ \ \\ ���'�� 4 1� �1 I{ �����,ii 11\\ / ``� 71� x71 �49 / 1 _ -J -/( / sa.s \ / o u s , I T i I I R/W RIGHT OF WAY w EXISTING WATER ��\AM ��1)�1 � �'2 \ F Fli � I \ / �I , ( z x464.6 / x46.6 \ ) j 1 -, � \ \ �- x461.5 \- I I x 56.9 \ I I TYP. SQUARE FEET PROPOSED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP BOUNDARY „ / - / 118 13� \ I Q _TYPICAL \ � 1���III� \\1\\\A��\��)W��,I 1l 111�I 'I \\ \\\1- l , \ \\ � I x46 �l \ \ x464.4 x464.6 / r- Q a,. \ ` � 11 / � �- /`� �~ /� O \I / x454.7 UG UNDERGROUND - - VND RMIIV D oo / I�Q 6.7 ~ 4679 ' � / 7- Ij �� 1 '� / ~ y I 766-090-004 PROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINE . FLOOD HAZARD � o \ x4 7\ \ / x464.8 1 ✓ \ �/�29 �� I I\ I VACANT PROPOSED CURB UJI/ \ / \ / J1�Q I PROPOSED EASEMENT /� x ^ 7\ \ \ \ �K�.6 -� \r I � / (/ �� / }/ C i� \ ` � )\ ( x 460.3_ ` 8 �� I N \ 2i ` / 00 IM I 18i� ^� / - ,aj\\ i� a. ,� �I ' , f ; o / � �( /�\ \/ so:, J \ J ' I t� I \ 1 - - PROPOSED PROPOSED LOT LINE IGHT OF WAY . 0 I � \C / � - / � ) � \ � � / x4so� � , I 'I - _%` l / ///''' r © v\ " I (/ 1 --\ x 462.E \ x 460.4 ( ill��- vO / Z I^� / 471.3 I 11l / � I1 x 470.4 / 1 \ x \ \\ \ \� I I \ -- � I � \ � x 2.a I ( y (�' 100' 200' 300' 400' S . � a�,.a or � \�� � s an. , I I 129 � -\ - � \ --, ,/ � ' \--- ` 147 -� i � � �/ M SA CONSULTING INC. / / 1 x 471.5 \ 11. \ /\ / \ � , x 45 U/ \ I I x J 462.5 \ �I lI I `I � M/U M/U "" - Civil Engineering LandSurveying in Landscape Architecture 1 I J \- - l x47.7 f j \ \ \ �\ I \ ) \ � � ( ~I 1 I\ \ SCALE 1 "=100' g g Y g P © Copyright 2025 _ � \ -\ � x4 \� \��� � - \ I� i � / \ -A I - - - - - - Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS I r / \ - MSA Consulting, Inc. �,- x4707- ,77 � I 7 /\\\y \1 \ l�^ N �6 I\ 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.9811 1 MSAConsultinginc.comAll Rights Reserved - - - z - �/ i � \- ,I'll / x467.4 \ \ \ I S1 U c a C O U Q P a 0) Q I. 01 IR a h N 0 04 00 3 7q 0 00 LO a LO N 11 00 LO 0 r a 0 12 > .6 c 11) 0) .E- C D EL Q (") LO V) i 967 �/ \ I � � -� I 11 ! � ,� / / � - � � I x µs,.a (- - \ \ o \ / / J � I I I I i 1 x 443.1 _ . � ___ I� , f , , ,, \� 1 x 452.1 � x 4sz.1 x 451.9 I /) f\ \ 1 \ \ / I x 445.9 ( x 443.4 x 443.2 �9 / I I 'I-] ) 203 x 451.6 I \ \ 9.4 \ / x 448.3 L � .445.1 I } I �1'1 / ,•-IFS ( ( ) c 4 L/ \ x 449.7 \ x 4a.a x 447.8 x 447.2 LOT „ P„ �t­;{Q `I x 456.6 / � \ / I/ 1 `l //F- G / x456.6 x \ / ) I x452.1 \ - - I I I\ / / C GOLF COURSE ' ,443.1 \ x 456.2 x 4ss I ) 1 x 452. \ II � 1 1 �01 r1 ,� / I.451.7 Q j xt 4 1� '1 z III l 1 / I x 452.4 I � x 45,.7 .448.4 / I I - / 1 x 455.5 ((( Tr- 'y / � _ I - \11- C\ x 4s6.8 x 4s6.7 ' ' Y / / / r, I x 445.9 � � f Ix 456.4 x 456.2 x 452.1 - - 49.8 44 / I � J - - v-__ - � _ / � I I I / 766 070 006 � � / � / /- � I // 764 840 021 - 1 �.2 � / VACANT / ,� x \� [) I y \ VACANT x442.9 I / EX. GENERAL PLAN & v0 / I --x44fi.. - I I) EX. GENERAL- PLAN & g \ 16.2 ! I - ZONING: , x44a.a x44a.3 � I ZONING:_ I / 5P _ � 471 II ( SP 03-06Z 443.2 / 1 \ PROP. AMEI ITYs�.,AK / � � xa� / III � - x 459.1 I x 456.a x 456.9 x 456.2 \ \ I\ x 452., 1-1 / .451.7 ".51.6 I I / / / I I I 1 I - � - /\ I 1 / Q / / �O� R" x 446.8 ` x 445.7 I 'x 445.91 x_=43�3 \( � / / x 448.3 \ / / \ 7`- _ / x 447.5 x 445.5 I I I \ - (\ x 456 ,/ \ \ I I I � - � ! / � � .448.7 � � � � III III - - j 55 1 � I I / / \ , / LOT „ W „ / / � x 446.7 x 446.1 x 445.9 ' I I ( 443.3 I 1 x 456.1 1-\ II I f J(/ AMENITY ( .449.6 /449. �_ c �) I I II I \ L / / x 447.E � x 445., I fI \ r / x a48.8 x a48.s x a48.1 J / / ---7 J x 447.5 x 4s6.8 \ Y /� - 7 11 I : 4as 1 -- J // / // L / x4` ( © I 1 3. x 458.5 � ( x 45 .3 .451.9 .4 51.�/ L � I �\ f__ x 443.' x 44fi.fi x 445.8 / , I ( ) _/ 1 l I // / f � 202 I / / y III 1 / r x 447.2 ✓ � x 442.7 I As �� I 44 .3/ .448.2 - I / PROP. C.V.W.D. EASEMENT / T 3 x445.3 � 1) " J� �7 PROP. C.V.W.D. EASEMENT 4 I x 456.2 � x 456.0 � x 448.6 / x 447 u' - x 446.6 / ( Y F}1 a 44,.6 '� b®W* x 456.8 x 455.6 �� x 451.9 x 451.7 / / x 448.6 r- x 4 / ` yi I - x 447.3 _ 1_--"46." - / -i .0 _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ / _\ _� 442.E / RR - - - IRR - _ - - RR R IRR- - IRR �� IRR IRR _ _IR -= r R R T If � I / � � � x 446.2 � � x 445.8 -L _ - 1 2 I - J4-} - - -, -� / / x 4s�8- - �.e -� .4&*7 x a4A A 47.ri - - - - - - - - �rJ - - \\ t \ \ \\�\\ I \ ) 1 �4. -1 I Y I'1 I I I I I III 189 \, \ \ \\j I Ill \ 1 I � I I I /_ .442.5 � 'I' lY ` \ \\�II I x443. \ �1,,. � � \II I I I I, , r II I �/ I I \8s �V'��. ' \\\1t 1 1/ �� �V1 I �/ y: _�)\II 1 I IIIIIII � 11 ��_ 11` ��\III 11 I��` �� � I I I I I , , 11 IIII 187 1 \ III x 44.51 40 '' I /�/� `N I I III I z' 111Jj1 I �I I IIII II 1 1 � J1 I x 442.7 I I I IIII I 1 � I I I � 186 I I I I I I I I I I I I l y III I 1 I II - I I III I I I IL / z I I IIII I I ,� I I I IIII F! t I { IIw l �I I�,�IIx4I x 442 141 �1E f I I 1 1 IIIt. �4 I /' T T,� � - - F II / �//11 ` III � \1 I I �(\�t 111111� I i� 11� F � I I I ~\ \ 2. �, 1841 I x 448. x 44a. 1\ \1 x >� L I I I I II \ I - � I 1 \ 11 I .� '\ \ 1\ I \ r1 I I \��\ IRR _ 'IRRy� \� h I III � , i L � 4�1- ` x 445. � �4STi ) I/ - x 455.6 1 _x 4s2.3\ /. �a9.3 _6 - � _ . \//'� . `. i �_ 111\ y �r R / \ F x 448.1 / \ V 11 \ z - 443 \(\, 1 -- - - f --- I 11 / �"� `EX.LO LINE � - -� �- _ -�� --- / / L .�TLINE 1 / 183 \ �I i 456.1 "> x 45.5.6 1 / / / � � x 448.7 x 448.3 / x 44 .2 �� f- `, / III I r ' 1 � r I I I 44 I 44 . 1 / I 1 , 1 x 447.. x 447.2 x 446.8 x 446.5 \\ I f I 1 1 I 1 x 444., I I I,�I ► I I I J ` � � � / �. /� I x4�� �� v i � \ II11I \ ;I � (� \ I I I►�I I ! �, II hI I� I \ l / // / x 448.1 � x 445�8 `� III I I 446.1 1 I 111I \ I ' I IIII 1 1 x 444.3 1 � (\ 1 / /x 451 I x 449.4 l 8.4 C .--.., _\ I x 4 .113 1 I) 1 1 II' I 1 I I x 4s2.1 / / / 1 x 449.2 \ � x 447.3 x 446.7 x 448.1 /I f-� ` I\ 1 I 1'i _____1 ✓ 182 I I E SHEET NO. 3 I �,_ \ �11 I _1 III I I I I I Iti III I ,W /\I I 1� JI I /II I I I I 44 I� / I _ I I / / I � � z___ x 446.4 I I I -,11 I I x 444.1 I I I 44 I I� ' UL](Sp I x 447.2 I I I ' 1 I� I / x 4ss.9 / 4 x 448.9 x 448.5 x 448., x 447.9 - - x 445.8 I I \� I x 445.8 V \ ) I 1 11 I I x 443.7 V I {// I�� I I x 766-080-06� / ) \ x447.5 ! x446.7 x446.3 �-_ �'\ I III41111 I r[I I I I I 11 ' I ' ' -1 I I�I �IY I x456.2 VACANT l \ ! II I I x444.. � I I 181 P/� I ( I I I �I I 1 ����.���� 0 4IjI I I Ex. GENERAL PI! N & x4 x45,.a A / / �' / ') I 1 11 F x4432 1 I � I x 458.5 SP ZONING- / / SEE SHEET NO 2 7 I I � ��-=- )I I I -- I; I ( �- A x 44a.4 j _- - I r�111�4I I ) � !, -_ I ) I I I I I I I I LOT "AD" / I x 447.9 x 447.5 x 447.3 \ I I I \ J I GOLF COURSE 99 / / ,/ % x447.1 x446.9 � ~IIII I �4�.2 _ / \ I / //// 1 )II)II III I QI a 451.9 x 449.3 x 448.9 \ � ' I I r / � / I 52.1 x 449.9 x 44..2 / L � � 11 I I I x 44 I � x 443.7 1 80 I 111 L 1 3 /S' � II 11, IIIIII 1 1 / Q I _ J I I 1 I I � I I) 1 I x 45� ( L- 100 451.8 ~ / I ) x 448.7 � - I - ++I I 1 x 44.7 x 444.3 ' \ I 11(, I I I I I III 1 - � / / W / x448.2 / \� - �I� I II 11 I I� l� .1 I I I I It�l III I1 IIIII 97 I -- / ,� II l \_ x 449.3 x _ ti I 1 I \1 1 1111 I ) � l I 44 f I, I Ix I �p, Ix 455.9 x 5.5 452.3 101 // x 452.1 �/ //)1 -\(x 447.8 x 447.7 447.3 4fi.1 / � 11II 446.Q I(4 1211 I III�I II�(II14 III II x 458.5 / / / / x 45,.9 (/) \ ` , I I ,� I I 1 ��i / \ I I I 1 �rl 1 I / I / \ Q/ I - -�_ `- 1 ++ 1 11 I x444.4 I f0 o I I I I .I 1111/// I/ I 1 11 I I 102 / // I x 51.2 x 450., -� �I d I 11 I I I ��� ► d/ �1�,/'1 ) 1 03 / x 45 9 x "� x 448.1 [ \ 46.9 �I I II� 111I1(^I 1 I /44 /lI 1I98x 45 5 1 1 05 104 5.7 I / / / use x 448.0 x 447.5 I 1 1 II x 443.7 /_ III I 11111 C / * 44 17/ I , Y / I I l/� / xV3S1/S� }} x"N / I � x 447., I I � r 1 I I1� Il 11 Ill . 1 1 I / \\ / / / 1 xass., x 4s �� , \� \ l I I I l' a l l I l I 1 1 11// l/ l x 458.7 f I x 456.4 \ 456 2 / . / / \ �- ^ L � 1 / Ill // / I'I � �/ � HI EMERGENCY / I � � �` 1 I . � 1 /// � I I I Ill - /' 1 1 xass., xass.7 xass.7 / VEHICLE FIRE o xasz, l 11 f �� / I - _ / �O / / TURNOUT LANE // /MHO / x445.s x448.3 x447.8 x447.5 x446.a II I I \ LO "U" 2� �\ ��\� I / / j o l lllll III l �I / x asz., x 4sz., / I x asa.a I x147. 1 1 4,4t SF I 1 \,,�� ` �O I I 44 �2 I 1 / / zs I - / / I I I 764-210-007 0.1 AC. 177 l - /I ! M l 1 / �l I (I 111 G`� l / x I \ �1 I / / / m m m m / � ` - - 11 I VACANT / 17,270 SF l I v // I I(o1\ x 448.2 I / / /� / 9 I , \ LOT "AF" LOT "AY' � / T � � Z � e - I I EX. GENERAL PLAN & �� \I � � � / /l� / / I x �45 x455.8 106 x455.8 / / / / x44as PROP. LOT LINE (TYP.) x447.7 I I Ao ZONING: 229' 11 � I 1111 111 /// /lI I �\ I / x 445.3 x 446.8 \' 1 x452.2 /� // I x450.8 / / I SP 03-067 I( k / / I 1 / 3 / // � /� � y � \ x 4 7. l / q0 / T \ x a5� PROP. EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS & I , x 4472 1 1 1 1 I �I 17�- / / ) 1 I / 44 / / /�j / WATER/SEWER EASEMENT \ / xasz.3 / I x ass.a x asss \` / -� I I _ I I I �4�a.�94 S F / / / / ��/ /j� \ \ I / I i x 447.. x 446.7 ^ / / / / / / I 107 - x / / / I I ( 229' / // / / � �// �� / /✓ //��I�/ 452.7 I I I , / // , , / / / " / x 448.8 x 448.3 x 456.2 \ // x 455.9 x 45 \ , `, A I I / / � � I I I D� / 2� x 43,4 x 2 ' 44 / � / // `` x 444.5 il� 92 x 455.9 \ 1 - - _ - - - ) I x 452.3 / 449.5 I- - x 4)­ 1 x 444.8 17 5 / J / / / / / �/ / / �// �/ � �/ ✓ I 17 \ - - - �. I I 17,156 SF �[� / / / / / // / �43 .5 i x 455.9 LO "A�A.o �. 10' P.U.E. � � x aaz6 x a4zz F I II - r �i / / / /� / I / / / / �/ / //�/ I I x 33.3 `� _ PRC{P�MERT�ENCY VEHICLE ACCESS & � 1 PROP. LOT LINE TYP. / � / / / / // / / / // _ �: � \ ( ) �, / l /l 11 G, � i 9 � / � - - - - - - 1 / \ � � EX. LOT LIN � I I 1 225' � / / x-6.4 x-6.z `/\ / x45 - - �� / WA R/SEWER EASEMENT \ xaae2 „�-�r \ I I - / / ^ / / I /� DARY A�A9 3 z�� 1 � I \ ` 174 h / / x442 I // I xass. 0 1 � 418 SF / , 44s.8 .449.s x 448.6 c ` - 1 I 1 ( 17 327 SF y / / 44 . 47 � x 43 6 / I1 ^ / / / Y x 4�8. x 456., / / A I x 451.2 / I . x 447.4 � � / � / / 204' PROP. 10' P.U.E. xa4zz �,1\ II I I 222' 443. / / / / / / / / % i / /I x ass.3 / / (TYP.) I I x as,.9 as=r , Y 11 I I 1 / O o / / / / / / / / ca /I (� x 4a7.s �2. x 452.a �, I I � LOT ., P„ '� � - - � � ,� �. I I I I I � 173 � / �� / / / � / / / /�I / / �'/ 456.6 I - 17110SF �.7 �(%,(/ 26,089 SF N 452.8 x4`I2. I � x451.6 x451.2 x450.4 � / GOLF COURSE � � I VI � I I x4as.s 17,127 SF� � � / �/ 44 / / �� �// // / x433.s � �/� \ x 459.2 l x 4s6.4 x 456.2 "O0O ��- \ I J x 447.5 / 4 / / / // D, �\ L\ 234 /�^ �� - - LOT "AN" I f T / / / I I/ 11 I i /IV \ I I I x 445. ^ �26, / / / / / 5 � �34.7 P 1, o IL -- - .,-sa = � -7 �� � - - - - 0.3 AC. - _ _ - 3 < - e., a� ) I / / / / / /06) 4pb\.� / ' x459.2 / 13 \ \\ \ " / \ 1 x451.4 .-1.a x450.3 C I 172 / // // /Y/ //, - , \\ x I / � T6-ill 936--SF l \ \ I z _ ` I I I 18,418 SF / / / s / /l 1/ // �,� \ ` x 460.3 x p5 . 1 6,332 SFs. x 455.7 x 455.5 x 455.5 x 452.4 I / / / �� �� PROP. EMERGENCY VEHICLE J \ o \ - J I 3 / / �_ 9�I9 l ACCESS EASEMENT � .5+�7-�� 29 - - - F - xaa..6 } 2 4 e / � �/ G `� \ x43! / � �ss.z PROP. LOT LINE/� P. \ \ \ x452.3 - x4so.s / - � II �o� / / - -/✓n� - 59.5 2Q GL� 1 " ) \ \ I I � � / x 447.9 x 447.7 x 447.9 I fJ / / 43 / / 1 / /1 / 7 / \\ V x459.a / o / \ I ` � 1 171 // / /� / //1 , � / \\ ( p Tr x a58.9 ' o. / 1 \ \ (\ .451.7 1 x ass. 19,456 Sr/ / �44 . �/ / �/ I / .440.6 // / � ,- i 12 1 , 500 S F I I \ x 450.6 x 449.5 / . v Yy 1 / / / /� / �/ Ij � / / �J 1 6,286 SJr / I I x 455.9 x 455.a \ x 455., I Z \ x 45,.3 _ I \ n < \ J �g ' / / / / P / ( ✓ L r \ \ Ilry � [ \' I / I IIII ► \I 44.8 / / / /l // l�, l lj/ 44 _1 J{f- x 448.6 � \ / x 11 i 216x ass.z x asas a'6, x asss 4sss f . ( � - - - 447.8 � 17 / / / 461�c / / I I \ I \ "r� , \ \ I 1 ✓ � � - \ I� I x 4 x 44�,21 �J' SF / / / // I x 41. l / "% „'- x asz.s I ��-- - EX. L�LINE - \ ��.� I \ - x4s,.3 � _/ -- 11 I c' ^ / �/ / / I I �ll / i /-� x 460.6 .2 6 \ CO \ \ / / I ��, / / /� /// I I / x 442.6 / � / I/ x 443.2 7 113 1 17 80 SF \'7c, \ � � x4511.7 x449.9 - 1, -. 83' 94'- \ III 11 1 / / / // / V/ I Ill I // / �/ 16,216 SF I 9.1 C x456.2 x455.9 x45 4 1 77 x45 3 87 83' 81' 81' � PI 1 169 / / / / / x 459.5 �f(, , x 455.7 116' x 453.4 81 81' 74' 79' \ l 1 II I JI , 20,595 SF x 444.s / / / / / // - / / / .. //� x 443.0 x 44; I\ _-) j I . \ .5- 77711 99, I / 11�1.3 �ix46D.£ W f x 52.9 x45,. I �j / . ✓ / /4�� //�, �� /I , e� Or x �r (T OP. 10U.E� ! s q� �\ \\ I �^ 449.3 \ I G ��V,� PROP. 10' P.U.E. / /0� J tc xaa4. / / x as0.4 _ `�� � x n�a ~ Y 11 \ 1 I 17,2 F 152 � I 446 9 AC.F ( / / / fr u �I \ \s \ I r� 167 �, 128 p �'� . x II TYP.) Q •P / / / a // / J 6 7 U x455.s 36789 SF N 18,421 S 1 o I o� `bPCr /// / �� / x44 2 x44z.9 SCAL r� 1 N o I 165 c� �4 /\ t / 1. 10 4i / //_ / '1 / O \ ( � m 153 x N N N N 162 �1 3 ��, 164 r',, S 18,106 SF 9 18,514 SF l 1 11 , - R / , / / / , O � - I x46o.2 22 I 0 26, xass.s xass.e xass. as--- 0 154 155 �' 452 0 159 N 160 N 161 �' 20,097 SF --? 17,800 SF 17,884 SF 18,770 SF v'� ` i / Z x44a.s PROP. EMERGENCY s, / l - , / q\\\ ` O PROP. 10' P.U.E. - 2 ,441 SF , 156 � is 15 -� 19,458 SF o ` I I \ / / \�\� �/ l I 4 SHEET 4 [ 1\\ r �I \ x459.8 x x458.83 �/ /\ �� (TYP.) vi 1 16,023 SF 16,277 SIF - 16AE4 SF `'-) 15,765 SF 15,6 SF 16,184 SF 16,, SF � � I 1 / / __ / / / / ACCESS ,&4 ��, _/ //I x4� 43 - 1 I / / / / / / r /�/ x o.z x 449.3 -�/ /)� I /� o, 11'16 649 S� B I 16,5 $F I �� I I 1 I / / // / / °� .� \ - - - - - x I as .3 z I / \ xass. 22� \ 44a / �j/ ��\ / I -gym . 44o_z I e } xf s .4\ __ �° 3 �� 2 \ �� -/ ✓ / D - `x 44e.7 - I x -_ / / / // /� � - - - - \ fff 1 - �y/ I r - I \ / 1 x 460.3 I 22 ' % x s9.4I I x s6.5 x 456.1 ` 5. x 4s3.7 -j�� 449.7 I / // \ _ d.5 / 9.1 � - 45 � �-�. 151 1 � � V V - 78L � O 1 ) / � \� �� x 443.1 \ x0 $' �5Y - - _ 79- -92'- - p0' G f �60 �" � 16,944 SF =62 - - - _ 90 LOT ' AU" 4 J \I �- ^\ _ -! /_. 133 `b � /\ \ �7- � 86 - i00 - 81'- -8T- - 89 - 22 SF x � _J �� -f - �_ - J8,5�@SF� �- ti Q �670 �� _ �_ - - ---2 _� `-_--�_ __ _ _ =_-f�= D _ - - - _ N - �� 800.0' - LOT "BH" (STREET "H'Z--- - - - - I\I J/ ��� / , yy � � 4431 3 Q 16,8 / / / // / C\ \ x 467.5 •3 �/ d� 11 R ��� V- �� `�' ���1� ✓�� 00 �` ��� ,� -, �Np l \ -_ --_- \ \ i Ql.�_ /� / f / •r� x 4/ / �// 450.7 /��/�� / / / ` \ \� i� �� f - - - -� €- - _ - CCC PRTfPrW1kFER , VO'rtrt a ,. 1 / \� _ C � - x c�.�'- s - S n ��as3. J �4sc >� `�4 2-p�afi, . s �� 1 ��' I- I 7 N 89°48'S5" E 1322.85' - - - x4 - - _ - - - I o __G �/ / /� / ///�/ I\� �� \ xa4�3s� x 4a: 11� 7 > \ xass` Js s - - �`� � x ass.s _�� x 458-2 - � = x as7.s '�j� I / \ 1 I EASEM E T / / /�� / x a3 .s / \ I / )' 5 ( 4� � '��� _7 \ x�Y7,28t.�C �� - 05T7"AR" 3 } S `� 1 LOT ..AR.. � I 11 r\ / /� // / / / i `i �L� / `ss.s \ I-,�4ss:� ' �� 40,150 SF xass.s EX. PR�JEI`T SOUND RY & T NE x4 0.z ,`� % 1 2 i I I LOT 65 S 5.1 /44 / h G /// / / / fi7 1680�SF \ / / 17,1SF �/ Q 4/232 I 1 0.9AC. x4 x 4.2,. / x45 I 11I la // / / / ��/� / // �//�I`<43.2, x443; \ \l \ �� / �\ \ Q I �� \' D \ x45a.5/_ 5 \ M I 0 ! , I I/ 111 2.o AC. \ / / �44 � � / / /l /l �/, / � - /_i /, � L (/)\��� I/1 �Lf 194 / I \_ - \ - � \ �i � 1 57., i I r x 4 .9 2 �gy,_" II � � / �/ /c/ I\ram 4 .7 x 456.9 - x /7.8 x 440.3�{ f � x 'I49 I I _ I l 1 i / / / l / / / / /�i -� _ _68.5 `` v �j}6 1766- 0- \ \ I ^' % \ I I \ / / 4sa.z / o 17,418 SF 1 0 _ 766-090-01 1 / / / x 466.2 � 118 \ �- x 461.5 x 56.9 x 447 450. l 3 J � ✓ \ 13//p1(' / 1 ill �- x 4 // o / / I / / �� �/ / / / -=_ ACA' •xT4s7.4 / (© \ � 17,41 V SF - - � � � �~ N Q 22 x \ I I x 454.7 .t i �s -I x ��q� ° I I x 450` i x 48.2 �, / / / / /// / I / x / 8 / / / / x 44Q�.4 ' - \ ` - - �,54. VACANT / / / / / . I � /, j� Z')6,952 SF 9 ��ll n �- �i7 `-� x4879 \_ - �' �� f '-/ /� �,�, 766-090-004 766 090 003 766-090-012 / x44 / / ��/� /��/ /� / / / / I0/// �j _/\ \\ x4 x464.8 79' x43.9 l \ \ I VACANT VACANT RESIDENTIAL / / /, // - 1 \�� ^ 196, \ j�' \ \ (x462.9 �, x46°. \I _ \ r 764210029 VACANTt8;/ /1 / / / % /�/ /� I I -� / / �440 / /�x 70.4 \116 \\ �� _/ I I \� L \ ' � 1681�S�-I� N \ EX. GENERAL PLAN & x44 / /// 1 I / �` l � � ^,- f �` � 6. � i � 6.6 -_ � � I / i. f \I 3o / j c�, ., 60.� /\\ 1 I I I � � x _ 1 1 I / / , .i /f ) I / I / J /� I 1 3SF \ x4a.9 ZONING. SP 03-067 I �,// // x4 // x44. /III 1 (/ // // II / � I \ �, 'I, I LOT "ADx 1- / �I /I 1 x44 //// 450 AI/ xass.a I �T "�='L,426 SF ('i �� ` \� \ \\V' GOLF COURSE mN 222 xµoV I I A:�___ xoy\iEX. PROJECT BOUNDARY & I 1 \ / / / /// % \- �� / / � / \ \ / }j�j��}{ x43 I/ \ 1 SF \ � 1 2� �� [ I I 51.1 � e / / / 46. / I� / / /s { / x 470.4 / o a \ \ \ \� I I I 9 \ µ � I I LOT LINE E �1 \ i / / // / J/ I l l / / �3.� \ / ttt4,JJJ 1 I 5 \ 147� 1 / / / // x 445.3 3 x 44 . 2 x 441.4 4 1.4 1 \,�\ \ g :-� 11 129 \ \ 1 \ \ �1 \ � v 44 .4/ / / // / / 1 �r \\:\\, � �o I �7� \ 16,823 SF / � 9 / / / x t f 4 / 1 \ x 471.5 \ \ 47� \ 7 v. S F \ ` \ _ �/ / 1 ­1 11J f� \� \\ I � m 22 I I , 45� I / x4�0.7 / // /�// // �C/, / // / b.s J 41,.4 / J1 1 J x 4 .7 \/�" \\ J I I M x i 462.5 v\ 1\ M/�J M/�J M/�J M/�J M/ I / /�/ / l I/ �/ / x %� �l I/ \ \\ _ \ Il z � (� I'I \ CALLE CONCHITA x45,. 1 /�� V'\-I/` / / If �, L- \/ (((''' \ U� Ln , \�\� \ �j' \ \ \_ \ �` I I \ \ - x 450. r \ \- // (r7// ,/ / % , T1 )�t� l l >-x'470.7 �x`4T.7 ? \ ( ( � \ \ \\\ 1 - ✓ ) ` C VV I I \ _ �r . /r� I l 1 lt� wa 4 / l _-'-'ZLI/! �I\ x 467.4 \ 17, 6D S 1xa7, / o PROP. CALLE CONCHITA I \ � / 442. S - ^P � 0 7,.5 Sl O6\ \ \ s a -12B /- \ V \ \ _- \ r I \ R/W R/W R/W R/W R/W o ENTRY I Ir ///// 1 � L� s / /x /�/ f /x 4741.8 �\ \ � , / L \ \ ,928 s 1 �4 &3� ' _\ � S i 2 ' / \ I II I I >n31 45 . / l /�4 .5 1 `� �� I -�/` \ \ o / / / 111 ` -- /� �,� `` �Dy� rx 47 \ 7 \�,� `�� \ f 1 \ I 1 'r L p �` ' l G� / \ \� /� x 3 III T 474.3 2 ( 67 x 465.1 \ / x 463.3 / 453. 6 81 F ' / � \ / \� I ��l 2 r x 7 . \ _ 0 ) \ \ 18, 528 S F -S145 � '' � 52 0. AC / x 446.7 / /� �l // // o �43. - ' I / � \\ �/ % /f \� \ \ � \ > /` 1 I \/ �\\ �J - '� ,� � \ � \ � � p'I' \ I _ EX. PR�J E O�1 N DARY & 1 � � / O 2 8' � / \� I �1 �_�/ \ / ��� � � xass �i �- �� Q tOT LI \\\ \) q' x 468.6 / / 1 { / /// \ \ I I �//` \ �� \ `l 1 12 1� � 'i \ I .a / V Q �� �� f V x 462.4 / / - 45 I 11 x 441. -----o \ � /// \ 4p / . \ u � \ �18, 768�F 3� z\ � \ - 77 l �W 1 I 45 . /.� / DV R A L PLAN & I I f I r / x 442.5�, �° / \\ \\ r /-L\ x a7�a 7 J- �� 7p' 79 \\ -� v\ ° 144 !�\ I f/ 5 l l x aas.a / I 1/1 O x aaa.s \ ( ((� x 4 \\00 / �- -.`/. /� LOT "A 67.5 - \ H I\ x 53. / / / I 1 \ o u I/ V\ C 4>y4y A x{� x467.a 18,14ZSF .� 766-090-013 I o II 1 I o I / \ 1015 SF 1766-090-010 Z I / / 067 I O I �� �j -� \��\ W x4 ��� f \� 1 \ 4 2Q \ \ 0.2 A U / 6 c7 - (� VACANT - / / Q \ \ \ I VACANT 1 I/ / / /�/�/)/y//// I //��� I 1 �I I \Ir `�\\ J -� : ? �� x 482. ��� \ \_ � � � \ ", � - ✓ `� \ - \ \ - / 3 � i 00 I VI_ / x 45 V , / / I l x 446.6 I I , \ (� \ j� 5 / �� �l \ / I I p® ��x \� , I, \ �1 / �4~s l ���,, I - 1 1 I IIj// / l l l ll� 11 IIII I \ \ �//, x 1 2' ? x 484.6 '1h�2 '��� x 46� 9 \ �� I - O a \ \ ,� I // / 11I �1 1 I , I i� x 445.4 \ \ / / _ M/ II 19,75SSF� �� \'Y.�,i.'� 7 \ \ o\ / 143 /l l l _ I \ \ r- �/ 5. 11\�` O \�� 11 / /`)� `x 5.2 Z\ 2G J/7 \�`�\ \ �� �1 , 56 SF \ I IL x4s .3 1 54. / 10 IIII -� IIII1 I, I o /-7 Zl�1\ 1 // \ \ L � \/1P oI I 0 // L CO JI4 J \\0 443 I 111 I / � _�4� I \ x 484.5 �- x 471.5 \� \ \ �/ \ 1 I n > x 4 .� , / / / x 44 I` II 1 \ A \ X� I x / i ,, IIIII �19 i _:�_ \.�\� \ 2 ` M / 1 I ICI I �11111 \ ` � ll)1 ,� \ - _ r\ �._, \ � , I' I I� � \ r / ////� I III (; �Q�.." ENTMR , ENT LLY i ��-\\ 1 \ J x �'l � W x9EA.3- _ / / o^ I II \ I \ ��� ���SENSITIyE AREA \ / / �( \ \` \\\\ \ \ ✓ / \ 123 \ 4iA i \ 1 - J O MIDI x 4 2.7 , \� ✓ / \ 437.J/��ppp1A�\44 /� 1� �\ `/ ��\ �I 4 \ v� _ 465� I "�-f`'-'�' l / 1l` l �.J ��,)� I A \\\ \ /_� x 444.9 \ � �� /� /n �� r (� �- / \ x 4 16 17 S F f - - - / P 1 I1 \ \ i `\ \ \ I 1 �i �� / l\ ✓ -� �I 7, 31 \ � � i �� � 47 N x 46.7 / J/ \ \ �/ l 111 C NC I F'tiyC �\ �/� �� � , \\�^ \ x a7z.s \L\ 2, x 47,.4 \ ro /� 0 r 67 1 1 I / Illl \\ �`�I �� �� /��) ( \ \ \ �� /� �/ /- `ear S `\ `1 �\ \�/p`S'e �� 0 21 / x as7.s �^'�J �� �� \\ 4az. \ V \ \ \ Z L�+'' 1 /.� \ \ x 446 \ O r / \ 4 . r J % �� -, / �° `� 43' \ 11 \ a I o \ �, x 4 7.2 x / IIIII \ \,�`��/////// \ \ (� \ ✓ \ \ / \ L �4, / 7i\�' \ \� �\�C % IIIII I �� \ \\EX PR(O.l�ND g�,� l v'� \�24� \ \ r \ \� PRO j. 10' P 6l E. 1 I LET " c� I / 11 \ - �a5� \ i~ \ / C. \ J` (7 LOT / / f 0,7 9 SF \ \ I � \73.4 u,� (TY I 31, 1 F� IIIII I 446.4� � � �� �� \ `(� V ���� ( _ � \�� % �� \ I \0.7 AC. I l / __ O� r _ \ \ \ � x442.7 \ \ L , / �� v/ \ \ ` _ \ r�� m 141 \_ 111 1 \ \ _ I� I / , . � \\ ��_ v/J�ij/�j$$// \ �� x 483.5 �� V / �/%\ \1215- / \ 6 080 �0� / � �\ \ \� �1 32,535 SF I I �` l Ill x447.4 / ✓J \ \ \ 1 V ,� /( �) �� / / / V \ 2�f36 SF \ IIILkVACA-' J x475. \ - I ✓ � 1 / 1 IIII 1 �����\ \�\\� �\ \ \ I \ / \ -6 /- I\ E RA LAP L N ^ ,/ \ / x 45a.7 rr /�� \ \ / st� ��(� / / /� \� Ovi�ING: ��/ LOT"AO" \ �� x44.4 I I �� , I I IIIII 7 (l (/ \\S�\�\\\\�� \, �I �� ) - / / 1 Vim" \ �� \ �� �\�� EK03-�067 \ �0338� F I \� / f /, I xa7o., . ,I /I Is \\\\�/1 a46.7��\C� xass�s'r I \ \\\ \\\ \\ l / \ \�� �, �/ / /1/ / � � �\\ d �\ \ U \ ��\\� ,� ` �`I ► I --\ \ I I `� 1 /�� \\�\�\�\ �11 �\, y�- �� ,\� �� \ \\� 1^ \ �/{� � / x 4 1 `I I)�I x 44.5 \ \ \I I \ p \ , i\ / x 440. / // / I x 501.6 \ \ ^ \ V �\ \ �\ \ I \ \� \ \ \��� \ / ' I �I I I IIII \\ / \\�\\ \\\ \ \ x 43 f / \ \ \\\�\\\��� -V �- � I / / � / � � ti �\ " \\`��� 1 `) - \� � x`>��1 \ 'i 111I o L I , I I I I I I I � / / \ \ > I ( \ \ �� I � / / / // ( 1 P\ 46.1 \�\\\\� \ \\\\\\\ \\ x439.6 � -_ //" �I 1\ \1 � I/ ' �� � \ 111 III I II � f \ I I II P ��\�\� �� \ \\,� , 0� � r / __� / \ > x 505.0 \ \ \ \) j` \ ��I II `� �- \ / Q r� � � \ 1�411II1 � �, , 1 III \ \�� \ ��� , J \ /\ \ I I 1 II \11\�\\,1�1�pX1 ��� N� �� 1 �� ,1 1 ❑� ) �� \�� �\\� 11 \\ l �v/'� /� / x502.4 / ✓ -lI x505. ` x499. 50�.2� I�L�1� 'NQ� \ / ��9 G \ / \/ 766-080-007 I T 4 II �I (IIIII Ilx 4 J 1 \\ \\\\\ \\ v,\\\ / ��/ / o L. ` �/� �,�} o I� IIII = \\ \�\ ( I \ \\ / I I I \ \I �l�1!h\0 \ \Q 1 2 \ \\�( 266 S'F I ul ( RESIDENTIAL I 1 I I I III �\ \\\\�\\\ �\ � v\, \x 438.2x 463.2 \\ s / -� ��04, \ \ �, o� 1 � / 1 1( /III II 44 ' ��o �\��� \ i \ I 1 W\ `\� ) �/ / / / x 503.7 x 503.6 f\ I I ( \ , J \\\\\ t �^ ��\ - \_ /\ -U' _ /�/ \ \ \ o- = 1\ 11 I . 4 �F6 . , 11I I I � \ \ " O\ \\\ \ \\ \� \�\\ \ • '\� \ \ l ( , , /- L , / x 5oa. % I I I 1 I \ \, ` ��I \ \ \ \ ► / ill \\lll \\\\\ 1\\ \\\ \ \ x \\ '�� \ �- / /� x 504. \\ I 1 r/ � J `( \1 �N Q \ ~ I 215' -��y '- 47� " �1� II \ \\\ J \ \\ \��\\�(/ x504.6 x503.6 / V I x497.4 \ \ / \ / \ I \ \ '1I1 I I II111 I I 1 �\ o \\® /\\�\�\\�\ �� \\ \ \ \ -� �\ \ \ I \ 1 �� I 1 \����\ �� �\ V �� \r �� \ I / I I IIIII x 447.E O / .c� x 445\0\ x \\�\0 - \� \ \\� � \ ' - \ \�, x504.7 \ I �� / /I I > II II �4 \/ � 1 \ \--,\,\ \ �� , \ �, o / \ I ��� o\/\ I/ _ \�/ I *I I �4 IIII ►II� ®\ f ® ��/ ��/�I 1\�\>� -T \ Z\ `-"� I \ I / / \ ' \ / �1J483.5 \ I \ II I o / I I^\ \\ \ ' U\�\ \ \� \\\\\\\ `�� �� \ I \ \\\ \��C � I I � a7.6 \ v \ l - I I 41 I 1 jI I \ x445. � r \\ \\ X\ ( , \�, xI \ _ _� r \Q� �'��'41,- I1 / J III \ \ o __� \\\\\9� �\ ��\\\�\�`_ \��' �i \, x50,.9 \\ \ \ \ �Q �OT �BJ \ \\\ x4 .6 / / 11 Ill �1 ^ 1 4.6� \ \ \ \ �� =� \\\\ . : - - \�If \� � ''^^-_,��///JJJ \ �02., �� \ \ \ \- I 61lV.D. 4N LL TE / L� I / /� IIII 44..7 II L x a o- II I� ��\\\\\\ \\ _ �� - \� \\ \\ \ `\\\ \ \\\\�\\\ � � �,� x 494 a \ \ , , \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ - - � x 4 %/ �43, 04 S 1 l 1 8 \ \\ \ I 1\ - x 52s.9zz \ \\\ �.+L_ �� \ JJJ I ` / I I I / I I I 1 I� j_f \�\\ -_ -� `. __- �'' \�� \ \ \ \ C r\ x50,.3 \\ \ \ \� \l I \\ 11 � 7g= -- \\\�_ ` --- \�\ \�\\ y\ \�_\\��\\ 45� \ mix 02.5 \\ \ \\�\.5 \^9 1 �� nA�11 I 1 Q�49 \ \\ �. 11 �� /cam �£C_ \ I �y 1 \\ \�\����\ �,a� ;- \ �\ 2955 SF \ - \\ \ -� �� \ \' x 459.E \\ > \\�� \� x so,.a \ \�\\ \ \) __% \ \ C.if / \ _ � r / s\�� \ / \\\ \ \ �?11 P 0 . LAN C ASEME \ l� �� \\ x \ \ 2 - \ �T� 11111- �� ��\ -� �" - 9"31'01" E 710.64' _ ✓-_--`____ \\\` \\\ \� �\ \ \ x�s3.7 �V� ��` �^..T OU Y \� = 52fi. ��RQ ' , ti \\ \�\\\�.�� ®\ \\\�� \ EP CT �UN� Y L \\\�\\�\ yr\ \\�__\\_ f �� P. trrt6�& v R \ 7p6�6-110 I \\\\\\\ \ x 52fi. \\ \\ \\ \ \ �L].LS I D�CNT 4 x 4a7.5 O Copyright 2025 ���\- __ x52�\ \ 1 I __ L - - �- - - - - - - - - - - - - \ \ \ \ s s---­�-- - W w -- W-� Pv1/ a ��-_ -- \I \;; ''gyp 24 I \ - - - --E::F- - -_ z r - - - -E -- - - - - - �= - - -- - ----- =----= == ---� s ® S_ - O/ E /2i" IRR IRR IRR - ---------�---------------i 1 I I �N <1 I 1 I I I 27 t s .vzs -�- g - - / IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 39058 EXHIBIT DATE: AUGUST 19, 202S REVISIONS NO. DATE DESCRIPTION 52ND AVENUE 0 9 AVENUE 60 54TH AVENUE CITY OF F__ LA QUINTA uj Ln zp AIRPORT BLVD. tia R�� VICINITY MAP N.T.S. 58TH AVENUE AVENUE 58 COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE J w w Of Of ul V) SITE o r-mk z z Y Q +" 60TH AVENUE ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND (E) EAST 679.3 EXISTING SPOT ELEVATIONS (N) NORTH - EXISTING CONTOURS (S) SOUTH (W) WEST X EXISTING EASEMENT DELTA AC. ACREAGE APN ASSESSORS PARCEL NUMBER - - EXISTING CABLE BNDRY BOUNDARY EXISTING IRRIGATION DRAIN LINE C/L CENTERLINE =N - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING EASEMENT C&G CURB AND GUTTER E/P EDGE OF PAVEMENT - - E EXISTING ELECTRIC ESMT. EASEMENT - -G EXISTING GAS EX. EXISTING - -IRR EXISTING IRRIGATION M.B. MAP BOOK - .. - .. - .. - .. EXISTING LOT LINE NO. NUMBER N.T.S. NOT TO SCALE - - - EXISTING EDGE OF PAVEMENT O/H OVERHEAD - - -T EXISTING TELEPHONE PG. PAGE - o/H T EXISTING OVERHEAD TELEPHONE P/L PROPERTY LINE R/W EXISTING RIGHT OF WAY PROP. PROPOSED P.U.E. PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT - s EXISTING SEWER R RADIUS FM EXISTING SEWER FORCE MAIN R/W RIGHT OF WAY - w EXISTING WATER SF SQUARE FEET PROPOSED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP BOUNDARY TYP. TYPICAL UG UNDERGROUND - - PROPOSED AND EXISTING CENTER LINE PROPOSED CURB PROPOSED EASEMENT - - I PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY PROPOSED LOT LINE i it • 00 •• SCALE 00 U c a D c 0 U Q P C3 0) M 1i a n a h N O 04 00 3 70 0 00 LO a cM L N 00 LO CO r Q_ 0 12 ro > .6 c a) :I- 0) c c c IL Q Q (") LO N ATTACHMENT 6 l �m � SUBMITTAL DATE: REVISION SUBMITTAL DATE: REVISION #2 SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025 DUNE 27, zoz5 AUGUST 29th, 2025 fi rep, 4- $,JrF, Jr - +'~ T i - fdw • `•.yjl# 16. '_•T• � � _ i •i•'� - � L7 fY' rL•:' .x .I .'1• a .` -i( .`i � �-• Jj Ir 66 i +• ,�i'�' �fr, . .. r+4 • Vo or k r- �.1 `' ' , ,$�•'� ,d► �'• r ti�I+r �. r ~` "'' w 4� . •�srit A_-�h` •+� • jo � � � I � � +.lay.' y �+ r• +f� �►{. y .%fs�f�rti `'!� •• * 1 cu _ M r w: -_ :yA sv'7 • t a 4 r 7 AERIAL SITE LOCATION SCHEMATIC GOLF COURSE PLAN GOLF COURSE SITE PLANS GOLF COURSE CHARACTER IMAGERY GOLF COURSE GRADING PRELIMINARY GRADING PLANS GOLF COURSE LANDSCAPE SCHEME SITE ZONES ZONE -PBS BUFFER ZONE - A ZONE - B ZONE -C ZONE - D SAMPLE LANDSCAPE PLAN ADOBE HOUSE SITE PLAN FOR REFERENCE- PERIMETER LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDED ALL REFERENCED SCALES BASED ON 24'X 36" SHEET LAYOUT CONSULTANTS MERIWETHER COMPANIES 2235 BROADWAY BOULDER, CO 80302 P: 303.395.3150 MSA CONSULTING INC 34200 BOB HOPE DR. RANCHO MIRAGE, CA 92270 P: 760.320.9811 HART HOWERTON ONE UNION ST. SAN FRANSICO, CA 94111 P: 415.439.2299 DMK GOLF DESIGN 2755 NW CROSSING DR. SUITE 225 BEND, OR 97703 P: 541.330.0400 INTRODUCTION AGE NUMBER This Site Development Plan (SDP) outlines the schematic design, landscaping themes, and general description of the 18-hole golf course and practice facilities within the proposed Coral Mountain Club, identified on the accompanying vicinity map. 03 Elm 05-07 l 1�&i The golf course site occupies approximately 182 acres of the 377-acre project site. It will feature 79 acres of maintained and irrigated turf, a 3-acre irrigation lake and a network of cart paths. These paths will facilitate golf course navigation and, where safely feasible, connect to a broader site trail network. Several accessory buildings and structures, including a clubhouse, and club complex, maintenance facility, golf academy and two comfort stations are under a separate application. Accessory locations and integrated trail connections are shown on the site plan for reference with separate specific SDP packages to be submitted at a later stage. Our goal is to design and build a golf course that is not merely another formalized layout imposed on the Coachella Valley, but one that stands out for its experiential, technical, and aesthetic qualities. The SDP package for the Coral Mountain Club golf course includes: • An index sheet • An overall site plan of the Coral Mountain Club Project, clearly delineating the golf course boundaries *Material and character image sheet • A 2-foot contour grading plan • Acolor-rendered site plan illustrating the proposed design elements and textures of the golf course The plan emphasizes the intended character of golf -specific features, such as maintained turf areas, bunkers, 16 cart paths, the irrigation lake, and the landscape scheme. 17 Architectural review of the golf course structures shown on page 02-such as the maintenance building, golf academy, golf house, and halfway house -will be deferred to a subsequent application 19 - 21 LEGAL DESCRIPTION BY OTHERS 22 PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 27 & 28, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. MSA (:ONSU LTI NG, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1 760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com GOLF COU RSE AT CORAL MOU NTAI N CLU B TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUAPY 6,2025 � SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 02 970 THE QUARRY ti �\ 58TH AVE LU N I `\ \ NOTE: EXISTING ADOBE STRUCTURE WITH 75" BUFFER. SEE PAGE 22 NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA (ESA) - NO GRADING! \ NOTE: 50' PBS BUFFER ZONE NO PLANTS FROM CVMSHCP TABLE 4-113 PBS FENCE NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA (ESA) - NO GRADING! CORAL MOUNTAIN N I SCALE 1" 3007' ()' 0 150' 300' 609 NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA (ESA) - NO GRADING! 1 1 1 r--_7---- — _ lI� u , II �II GOLF COURSE SITE (182 ACRES) J 58TH AVE .. .. . r416l 0 I l AN DALUSIA a --- --— �� --- 60TH-AVE --J—-------=--- ---- MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com SITE CONTEXT PLAN PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUAPY 6,2025 GOLF COURSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 03 971 OLF COURSE SITE PLAN NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA (ESA) NO GRADING! aW E 41 A• • , NOTE: EXISTING ADOBE STRUCTURE WITH H 75' BUFFER. SEE PAGE 22 0 40 AN DALUSIA • / / 4) 4 o ' I m e NOTE: 50' PBS BUFFER ZONE' ''—► NO PLANTS FROM CVMSHCF#:•:s:10 _ TABLE 4-113 = � • s C 71, 13 PBS FENCE15 / - . _ ('�'#t ` v+i� ' .-i11►a= rlM�ia-` : "� • � ' r. ( :;cY'...� � O ^ � . NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY ' -- - •sir.. .a �y` !, ~ - .4 _ "►- ' $•. w r. r As.:`,, J ' SENSITIVE AREA(ESA) NO GRADING! H 1i L CORAL MOUNTAIN ;:f:�,::A NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA (ESA) NO GRADING!40 _ tit.. - - JI , A � �� • • - _ +,, • - .. • �•• . _ - 1 C • eye• - �.. ",• w f • •t••,♦^, •p-.tea 1...r "T •: ,,,A A OF MSA CONSU TING? INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1 760,320.9811 1 MSAConsultinginc.com LEGEND - PRACTICE AREA g� IRRIGATION LAKE C� PEDESTRIAN TRAILS GOLF COURSE SITE PLAN The routing and sequence of holes form the backbone of the golf course site plan and are central to shaping the golfer's experience. Exceptional golf course routings guide players through the site, leading them to and from its most compelling features and viewpoints. Unlike the common layout of parallel, back -and -forth holes this design transforms the journey into a cohesive and immersive adventure. This golf course layout begins at the practice area, strategically positioned to face into the prevailing winds and away from the rising and setting suns. From there golfers are guided through a thoughtfully orchestrated sequence of holes, each reorienting and redirecting their focus. Along the way players reconnect with sweeping views of Coral Mountain, culminating in a dramatic moment at hole 14, which plays along the mountain's foot. The journey concludes with a return toward the clubhouse, completing an experience that feels both natural and unforge able. For clarity, this submittal only references golf course related items within the project site. For other items such as regional trails and perimeter landscaping, please refer to the Perimeter Landscaping Plans. SCHEMATIC GOLF COURSE PLAN PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUAPY 6,2025 GOLF COURSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 04 972 �, Cs .. fk. rr tr J r. s,IP (►.. F ,_ • 1 S ,� r^ •ram >a, �,' ✓/_ � .-} r.,•+- �� � �,�• 1 •! � i T7 lip iw - � - `\ '��+, - i'\'a ,� �i*� /r _.� I ''ark' _I ._ _ _ � t�, 1 •♦•• _ _ -- � - _ f i r .._.. '� �' '�in - .. y '1 .} '••rr,~, ! _ .JJ-,J!'. ti 1 �, . :�'� ?�. - _ - _ �• �ff F f s - r [ 1 1 7' l - r -rr .� t `r:• h J rr: i r t - iov - < Pf Ilk - r . l• 3 •► r _ 'r7 r - r - 1 r, �F • ( - 1 'r - t _ r R ♦ r r —t; f' f• 1 - t r - T S ,,� P - .• .-,� r 1, 1 � � _ •' ;mil r'%" - 9, - �'• it r _ > - -V t= A t- , Y :s - .�. ��� e-* -eFJ. �, a. - .i: r Y •..� � ;i f:Y - !:/1 jl, „r" _ I --L'i 'fl•, - 1 ' ,err �• � :t' ._ � M �• - y_,(1�• ..t i. t,.. .-`• - •1 J - lY R ,A 1 f T- rl' < r r \' _ '.�' - Est•• .r/,�4 4< • �R: _ .I � - -3 1 _ � P.4L _ IC�III � . -r.>• _ ; Y. r / n P J l ti 1 JS • , f •' 4 r n N +A o j s•, ,: � r.. 1 .t d' l r f f' _41 -i4 •t: ! S' � 1•Vrl f )�Zyi v ` Y= > •� ie. • k •tt r •� r' •3 '•1, r >w� s •c sf' ♦ '4 r3cJ - li. a r• > Y� Cr i 1 i t Tfa t )�` i • m 4 ' .,} r •• t a ' t 'a. _ t f♦ 7' _hal l f` ':y• f `fir -xk -=J �• 1' t i ' I.� 'r t _ ,•+b•""- _ • is ! .I f r. Y Y 1� 'r' r. s S, • y Jl r •1 . • r•• _ i r�'.''. s ilk r• t , � ' r ar. . J ae7►Jf'. `to W, ' .t!•• r.- --moo•... ,rw" , •,.R � . 1. >z i u3- � < r K .{ e 1 '4! i� �` _ _ •sue' '..:> . _ y. -r' L _ �•_ i 1 -•`t t' /! a G- r• - a• Y - ► r--s- - r i rr 4 • •1 •Y- 1 •rail � 1 i {. o f y�• , f t r e T. �'•. r � > s e r r f ,// • a� ! • jar ar )_� �- iS. �-4Ky -„ - tty�`} y' •1~r~ f. Y• a ./.!" �� �� -.'r, - k - � ��. � ! i f � ..ic _ '/ '•R '+U 1y� f��� n .w.i:' ..� - - :'f..�+ � �t1' '`�.` ^Y • �. I , i`- 1 . c i :f"•r- _'a: ♦• I i C r Vi•r+�G'S�� 4 r � _ e. •' T' ' '„•.: \r t - '\ rt'2`i/ - . r 1 / Als s iT•w• i da�� ,. ���'^ <t 4 2, 1f ' �'" J► r ]yiy r •` h ' r. •• .,iJ •r.,�•eY r _ 1. •'> lam+ ! -;. .d.>'% Y ' - ,I •ir _ Y �e'r T i � fit' - -S '�C%• :d`..- i+�I�, c r•M' � i• r,,. _ S ,�.� 0 1, f • .•N•. r • RY _ �i` +.� • �4 V "rt r - iti _x '��.- r � �"�L"�1'' ♦ ?(Jr• �/� �.%'. hJ�y�'•;: ; � rre,,'Sq fl`. f- � �i', � - y`�'y� '�) �. _ i• - - .•":' _ � ,� .I✓� 1„- ��r���;,1`-r w '� • a � i � r 'I�. • • •..] '� J�i /1/ Y • -•'�f�' ��},Fy ' , <�< • v i,I" c ,.{(ItJ. r r, , � • �� ,ei. �z. r: _•�f- '� '\ '.k wak- r 1 �� • •�' ` i .� ` / - - �� it ` //. I ,•�' '• • • r �" I c i- r- / ,Y'1 ( �- .� Y< N� 1� ,/� . ''R• a - iC'y j�I: 'Sr, \r.- 1\ — - !< . lV �'r " / // �'✓t��k�_ 'Vti 1,.. r .a�1-�� ltiL'/- r ��ia'`" t • i � f'>A}� I1r'��}/r�_ ..S jil� .r. �r_,.i( / ./ t. / '� s�•l,C�i. ' // Yam/ - .,�� �• \ � �1111 �� i � _' �D.,`�'- , \ \ ' � r. <,�l• / _ %' ` }il.. '\ .� � a1�\",,� �� ,� '1'• "> i -�i ,; r.,, •k 1 � �. .i !i) _tA�`'•j`�,., r Iw '� J:f,` � �' ' ., / 11 1 � \ �1', ' •� fr 'Y%t, ..•.f T, "t� .a, Y�• t ` k � �• f. '� IL�'y `�� .l1� ,f a a. r ����r /' I � i '���. •w \ r�.. ` ��r , J'i� �1�. . - �L •. f ky�-?l�,t'• i /. � r � ` i _ J.1 ( �� .+ Y", �' - h� � ,� _ „A, _ -/ <,• .���� 1!s' �t� 1 R'• - t;�e �'��� � t � ,1. r , f • y. \ /' .. � J•! _/ ; , fir, , Aa• M � s` . � ♦ '�l� f L3 f • sTa �� r�.� � ! ���' •• - l�Ir _ •t��! y 'lriri." `�\ ,`u, .ili 4 � v I \ _/ ,�'`� , �iy'� k,�� - \ a-L-• '��'�:, '�. � 3 /,ar ,V� .• �; "� I�h �`(�ar+.."Y •ilk '•. � jY.• �y'� ```�``. i`/�t•/.I" -� .�5-,' � V:. 1 \ !' �' , ��i' , _ t?. •.. � 1 .♦,'1'.11-'- Y �, :ram -�� - �• l''S / _.l -41 'r S ��; � }�(' / -• _ \ I _ �, i 1 � \ i � { �-• �L• a �' �_ , YI �. ._ I ,�'• All �. ••Si. /, .- III .E�� < - '/JN'^. , \� ., •, _ _ r � �' - _ ..%i%M� •T 'I�l'{•:I t '.A •�..^• F✓ _ ,;,^l7r�i ,r. Ilk i. a. \ �\ 1( •� t i � tt J a ,P yk YjR�' 'mil ' "/� . ♦r F -> X +`` •► - ► ; r a `Q'a •r' y' • ( r� �` a► y r c�. �} . Iloilo:' �1 :\ ` /1 1 (r J. ; � • Q $ , 'tiGti ' L •� ';c j4'ti y _'r.`E ; jj♦ 3 N ; :�' � • y r 1? -&A' _/. .sy', t • �ry_ _ • / " , ,�I ' 'V. J' , �/. 'Y •. '.>� _�•;JM!'�•� %' c � i .I , ` ". '} '�`r_ ,f( •��} t� / s���1.:r ! �� •• '�� ry, '�R;! •♦ 1! - s►AA '�•3 �� .l��.'`' /•• `_e ..-J�. i1" _+�__11 `A� " `•,�,. ��4'�t '�./ �,�`� �' _ f� >•r r �! l�'I"ir. -�; _i ��r - .ram .�'. S - y IV sti'R.( i /' ~ -..1 / 1 `\ `� 1-•r0a+� .a, :/' ?r; .� 1 ;"f,�' __ -J, / u \ '.i�\`, `\'c - --- ems: ''. \it � 1 ��� � `' � •1�1r� •�� • [> j14���gv •,` �` i - y `�/ f ,, J ." k'�I, �ttt < i ♦ ram'/• I \`r I. r.. ` j•a. :1(.i~ �s <Y�/ IF 'y`� /y '�'�' 4 - ' - It f .t- ,kl .af.. _ '-/i ,`1f��: �` (`3•.. Ar•�L'� - P �y� • I �p ,',tc�/'+►�`: \\• ( irl!' .f. r." .t� > - <'; �>. '•- - ''! 3r'r/'-Jy • �� • _ � - r 1 ryrr rtir,�lk' ,i' "-� "r1'•lI l� \ , v` '- '' •\ � YLf' Kc>. Tom_ �.y :.�J;- s_ li.., � L .+.ate- ��cf�'� t, 1 , i cd fir\` ��' � nl r •I =- 1.ti' r fl,r /y ,/ f _ /: ,4' .. 3— �}�+k,-, � _ ;r<-.'� -_ 'Jr.?„- ,� t,: �'• w � 1 � r� lilt ILI _ � L 1 4 ", '�II'':' `:%% , ,-�s,{'1 '_;},•% ,�:">. -. • I ��i;;• �'_ •�/y �'��\\+•1 r• '^, xt' � K "�' •� i � 401"? yy,i. -,-fit \r;.� _ii.1�- :y' �i�:a :�"ir._-�:: � 1 VA ,I .� t.l ,L .J •Ir 'rJ - _i/ •. - , . ID' ` y ' b' >\: i � ``why , I / _ ',� _ R ,4i'a ,°, h,` r•:�. . � � - 1 fI • 1' _ , • `I a ., \ �w '_ ;wr c � � _ .ram' ,�•) `♦ r.•.w, f,.5 �'' "U �-r° ice; .�< ,1^I' � It�7 -, L' tt a •�:�� .. � %, '•►" _ _1► .. a _ _ _ `qrr "'r , r � rr, •. 1. . ,� L IJ 1F\ dw •w. J i. �. i -C r r ' :t'►i' •J N .� -v R - - l� 11 Y,'n ,_ .` r•� s i 7/ Y.JI w• _ - I/r ,. `!? f' `��, - :S- _ Y' .4•_�•wr - •' j • y 1 f� i 4.. w N a ajT' J > j •.. , •... �' :lt 'r' F 11 '�j/, ��^ .:�f`- r y' (It/, •�.- _ J i -.'/may �, �• 1 r / � n_ _1R«'R -;N r ;r. \'d;,y _._.- _ -. - � , ' _ _ �.�-.rL•�t t ,C ,J` `� `1 •.%• • >� I `-, �,' �`• ( .•"M• 4"' - _ M{ �' 'r r v,. ,Via r -—_ roe, Y •lye Y 1v \ �� / .'� J .V. '� \•li`- .,7)w ••� <. ,, ` \ .••�! - •I i -pool 44k IL �♦ • • • • • • • •' ' SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025 - Y • ` 1 • r •r)LIP V , •! r , ` �.• ART P RIDGI w Amp"- •- 4 \ �C � _ � '•'ems_ t •ice _ -Z�� i -� _ _ -+7�' --� —7 _ w •�1_ \ .a ` �►�+ • � _ ` . .fir � ,� �'_ �'► �� `• . �.. • ~ � • • •• r� 1 •' - •r it • �]pg•is ; i 4TURAL AND RUGGED WIND BLOWN STEEP SLOP POSSIBLE POND EDGE EXAMPLES i INV MSA CONSU ,TI Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Lar Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Uti ZG'Jnn Qnk I -I— rlri— D—kr Wir— ('h a')')'70 I'7F(1 V)0 _1mix" 1a:IGILVA Uel SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025 li: --.r` .►,+_ `�- .' .. r"R `_ • ts . �' � *� � � -, � � `''' _ � •yam � - � _ Ah pp — If PI WV- •J a` T.. irL \�►'� • ;-i�r �y. .,.p• ► , ^ I 'ter= •Ii ti ' • • •_• _� •M. 4Lmb bull rw so ol NEW , Ilk f to .14 :04- ��'•'� ` � �`�- - � Y ��r• aim _ •. �' � ' ! _ 1. • L 1 l � _ Ile +. .^ d : ? .•,\ �♦ r _ r .�„ •T1' . ,. ,. � iM. J}i J � '. � s' �i7-.I•j�� .. t�� • .r . �. 7 _ �/ �' W,.t rl'•f 1 1 f •y� ,� �� t .r t• �.r.%/•� / I � r. / .��y_�%�j.•a• • ,r / � � !• •��1 •/I• -••'� � .I r � �� �r r d•71 A. 'I ' �..1/• 1 � \ • r ` • L1 • y 1 � r, r ''.: _ v ��`,`�1�•�� � � � �`r .•�'•... �" � ♦ ,�� r(, w` . � . 1l i{. • � , . • • 1, rl 1 ` � + •, � r .5,. , � ' r /% i -. �• , -•. err -• • • 1•, I 'i JJ��}/I' • • - �. . .'1'. ' f. '' _'� , y 1..•.. N i - ,�� •.1 Y \ ` � ,� -1. 7t' "-'i. ••���.; . L.� �I •''• � a �' 1 jj�� M\ .,, •,r 1•'\IAl `:�, .«• ,� � � ; � .% w ,�• "r;•`�•' . .1� ., • �, w iJ w it �I' 3t� •� `� �.I y x J. • ` i bar •, _ f , ' .r Jor t , < : s-0.-'•'•�; ✓,k :; ♦ r- • . ^ -•! I`1 ••.,',' 1i -•7. f� 'Y S t+/ �.. /+ - 1 �1 � 1 • L" .7 o I,•. 1� .211 rA aim v � � yet • _f�i r', `qt r _ f' may,. � ��' _i-.._, I _ m i a�.r.. .=4P• � j,'u1 - .� All INS Ad - .`•a+�� 1 � �A I ` ~ �-�K�' • A is C� L_ �L _ . - NJ J ale 10 r,14_ - _ — _ - i �► _ L' , L J'� '� - - - `G11 , ll, r \ 1 .. r ` 1 - - e i." :�•'' - r - - - < }' v- - ♦ - ;xt �.L - r� :�� �� � r_ ✓1- i '1��" ✓ fr'^ra j' '., ' .,)i.s ,1i{1'P y. �. , '�!a _ i� �"! r _ •�•_ ��.�1r'�•,' �.+ ,. :nj.- a .? . -: w. :/1'f ,1 i• l+�l:-- i y 1 :rt •r - r _ G d' g . .S. 1 . ' F .•i l r. a, k f• _ t :.tk • i j 7 ! 3• 4i, - rS 01•C:l _E r 7 i 4 d' - Jr 1 1 _L1 II •� r' � - - r,. j ^_ .GI _ d�. ffii- :.: r.,',Sfr" • ,a - r �- S 7 r I� 'I I :S ••V � a q. J •r t I .a i \ Jr^ r•w 1' x K M 1 3 ,•t6 adr• a c E Aal all _ _ - - di. i ' �> ,, , a- • err' �tf: a r. Aolo� _ �.. - „� �. � • � _ . •.v c f _ - 'lam "---' a♦k Y. '�• •li. .. r fir. r 7... �.,.M n•'LE. - / _y f - t �, • i I �' ✓ �t1,,_ rub ya La ACOI OR, �♦ • • • • • • •' ' SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025 _ _ - 58TH STREET NOTE: ENVIRONMEN SENSITIVE AR NO GRADING NOTE: 50' PBS BUF ZONE. NO PLANTS FROM CVMSHCP TABLE 4-113 NOTE: ENVIRC SENSITIVE NI NOTE: ENVIRi ARI 'RACTICE RANGE 'UTTING GREEN GOLF COURSE GRADING PLAN The design of streets and sewers for other site development components dictates the overall site grades, necessitating the excavation of the golf course to generate the material required for comprehensive site grading and storm -water control. Given the site's relati ely flat topography, the enti e golf course will need to be graded and completely re -imagined. Our goal is to create the illusion that the golf course seamlessly overlays naturally random and undulating landforms that extend across, through, and beyond golf holes - avoiding the appearance of artificial mounding confined to their immediate surroundings. The resulting golf course will be thoughtfully shaped and molded to appear uncontrived, ensuring that residents and golfers alike cannot distinguish between the nati e landscape and the constructed environment. For preliminary site earthworks refer to the preliminary grading plan submission. MSA CONSU XI NG? INC. Civil Engineering - Land Surveying - Landscape Architecture Planning - Environmental Services - Dry Utility Coordination - GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1 760,320.9811 1 MSAConsultinginc.com PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUAPY 6,2025 GOLF COURSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 08 976 0 SCALE 1 "=100'-0" 0 50' 100' 200' 30C 0 MSA CONSU XI NG? INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1 760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUAPY 6,2025 GOLF COURSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 09 977 P . - 464 + � L E. - 464 E. - 466 5 ./ P.E. - 466 P.E. - 466 E. - 46 P. . - 66 P.E. - 468 P.E. - 4 P E. - 468 -E. - 464 D o v D P.E. - 454 P.E. - 454 P.E. - 455 P.E. - 45 .E -455.5 .E. 457 P.E. - 458 1 a P.E. - 46 P.E. - 9 O P.E. - 3 P.E. /461 -h P.E. - 456 i P.E. - 456.5 1 0 43 441 0 440 0 C1 0 i u-Nil ME m I iiiiiiiiiiiiin. Iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiffl- A 0 a 1� z1a 47 442 r 8 ATER LE 434 \ P.E. - 447 P� Nil P.E. - 451 IP.E. - 450 a P.E. - P.E. - 448 P.E. - 449 P.E. 7.5 SCALE 1 "=100'-0" 0 50' 100' 200' 300' PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN GOLF COU PSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 10 978 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 760.320.9811 MSAConsultinginc.com _� �. - - iY .- r PBS FENCE • rf :. . NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA (ESA) NO GRADING! r a MSA CONSU XI NG? INC. Civil Engineering - Land Surveying - Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1 760,320.9811 1 MSAConsultinginc.com 13 !! E: NOTE: 50.0 PBS BUFFER ZONE. NO PLANTS FROM CVMSHCP TABLE 4-113 SCALE 1 "=100'-0" 0 50' 100' 200' 300' b 2 a "I �!ILI N. J A 477 R • 75, NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE �- AREA (ESA) - NO GRADING! v 67 459 o a P.E. - 454 V P.E- - 455 P-E - 455 P.E- - 455.5 P-E. - 456 P E. - 455.5 O O 4 P.E. -45a P.E - 458 P.E. - 457 \ i2 \\\ P.E. - 460 P E - 459 P E. - 463 P E - 461 P E - 466 P.E - 468 P.E. - 471 P, E. - 474 P E - 478 P.E. - 479 a P-.E.-463 D P E - 466 �r P E- - 468 P.E .470 P E. - 475 P-E. - 479 + P.E 479 p 479 R P.E. - 480 P.E. - 480 P.E. -480 P.E. - 480 1478 O 11 1 10 471 b Im Ln O 0 PE -456 P.E. - 456.5 P.E - 457 P.E. - 472 ] —� U I P. E. - 476 P.E. - 478 P-E. - 482 P. E. - 456 E.-455.5 P.E. - 455 P.E_ - 454 P.E. - 453 f :. 482 .PRELIMINARY GRADING P ANI SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUARY 6, 2025 GOLF COUPSEATCOPAL MOUNTAIN i SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN I PAGE 11 979 SCALE 1 "=100'-0" 0 50' 100' 200' 30C PBS BUFFER ZONE. PLANTS FROM CVMSHCP TABLE 4-113 PBS FENCE ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA (ESA) NO GRADING! MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1 760.320.9811 1 MSAConsultinginc.com PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PAGE GOLF COURSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 12 980 LANDSCAPE SCHEME �q . �or PBS FENCE ik" ZONE - PBS BUFFER �;w_ -w _ 4,�. ZONE - A .,.R. Ji ZONE - B ZONE C ZONE - D _ - iqs E: EXTSTI N S A D—O B E_STR-U CTUR E 175' BUFFER. SEE 2 ' 1 NOTE: ENVIRONME L SENSITIVE ARE (E ) NO GRADING! .4 NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALE SENSITIVE AREA (ESA rc NO GRADING NOTE: ��►. 50' PBS BUFFER ZONE. NO PLANTS FROM CVMSHCP TABLE 4 113 l NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA (ESA) — NO GRADING! MSA CONSU XI NG? INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture , Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1 760,320.9811 1 MSAConsultinginc.com - ." 1p t., �'�, 41. `}t1 ••a �.� Lys j., �' .� �0 •. I The addition of turf and landscaping to the landforms will create a golf course that appears rugged and unpolished - imperfect and rough around the edges. Fairways, greens, tees and bunkers will blend seamlessly into a sandy desert tapestry of nati e grasses, shrubs, and trees. This approach ensures the enti e site appears cohesive, with no hard lines or visual divisions within the boundary walls. The area between maintained turf and adjacent development (including lots, roads, boundaries etc.) will be landscaped to blend golf course bunkers and maintained sand areas into a restored desert crust that existed prior to grading. The desert crust will be developed by thoughtfully placing plants to align with the site's natural contours, such as high and low points and north -facing slopes. The restoration of a nati e desert landscape begins with reestablishing the physical surface conditions that support long-term stability and ecological function. Coarse nati a sand, decomposed granite, nati e rock and boulders may be incorporated as surface treatments to provide a stable, erosion - resistant layer that integrates seamlessly with the surrounding terrain and anchors the landscape that reflects its natural setting Nati e desert potted and boxed plants, will be used to establish the desert crust and will be temporarily irrigated to establishment where over time desert plants and ground covers will be allowed to evolve with light to no irrigation once established. Our goal is to give mother nature a head start and allow her to take the wheel eventually masking the hand of man. The golf course site has been divided into four distinct landscape zones, each sharing a common plant base but featuring varying accent species: PBS Buffer Zone represents a 50' PBS buffer area Zone X closest to Coral Mountain represents the highest and driest area. Zones B and C transitions between Zones A and D, creating a gradient of plant densities that mimic natural desert ecosystems. Zone D is the lowest and we est portion of the site. These plant schedules incorporate plants from the Specific Plan pale e which includes nati e species listed on (CVMSHCP Table 4-112) Coachella Valley Native Plants Recommended for Landscaping and excludes prohibited invasive ornamental plants (MSHCP Table 4-113) especially in areas adjacent to any PBS barrier and buffer zone. The landscape scheme of this SDP adheres to the design and development standards outlined in the Club at Coral Mountain Specific Plan and minimizes water use and promotes restoration and rehabilitation of the desert landscape post -grading within the golf course envelop in accordance to the Specific Plan. Final Landscape and Irrigation Plans will comply with the City of La Quinta's Water Efficiency Ordinance and the Coachella Vally Water Districts Landscaping and Irrigation System Design Ordinance. . «eyww stf�fis ssys� -_ GOLF SITE LANDSCAPE SCHEME PAGE SUBMITTAL D.6,2025 GOLF COU PSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 13 981 XISTING ADOBE STR TUR WITH 75' BUFFER. SEE PAGE 22 14 1• r ` • NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY � SENSITIVE AREA (ESA) NO GRADING! PBS 1 FENCE , NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA (ESA) NO GRADING! _ NOTE: &&� 50PBS BUFFER ZONE. NO PLANTS FROM CVMSHCP r TABLE 4-113 r r NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA ESA - NO GRADINGcoom ! 1 . 114 J `/ - ti MSA "nNSU .TI NG, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1 760,320.9811 1 MSAConsultinginc.com Olneya tesota Ironwood AZT cultivar 60" box or larger 60' 50% - 48" Box Cercidium floridum Blue Palo Verde 30%- 60" Box 30' 20%- 72" Box Field Grown, Clear Trunk Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm 1/3 - 10' ht 15' 1/3 - 15' ht 1/3 - 20' ht 50%-48" Box Yucca rostrata Big Bend Yucca 30%- 60" Box 20% - 72" Box 55 • Use in small drifts, as feature on outcrops with rocky conditions or for homesite screening 75 • Native to scorching sands of far eastern Mojave and into Sonoran desert • Do not irrigate after establishment. Surround with no -irrigation planting • Signature spots, clustered where water is (in between holes) 30 • Varied trunk heights • Small natural groves, may be used selectively to accent a wash/low area w/ natural drainage or detention • Thatch skirts are to be retained • Limited use 12 • Specimen featured at rocks Atriplex canescens Four -wing saltbush 5 Gallon 6' 50 • Spring bloom yellow Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 5 Gallon 6' 50 • Use on dry slopes or gravelly washes • Mass plantings at hole #18 and lake edge • Graceful backdrop Hyptis emoryi Desert Lavender 5 Gallon 10, 50 • Powder gray foliage and violet purple flowers spring through fall, fragrant • Mix with Creosote Muhlenbergia rigens Deergrass 3 Gallon 6' 50 • Purple bloom May -June Fouquieria splendens Ocotillo 15 Gallon 6 • Use in sandy waste areas as sculptural accent Simmondsia chinensis Jojoba 5 Gallon 10, 50 • Dwarf Hesperaloe parviflora Red Yucca 5 Gallon 12 • Native to Mojave Desert • White flowers in spring Native Desert Grass Mix - M uhlenbergia emersylleyi 'Regal Mist' Bull Grass 1 Gallon 90 Nolina microcarpa Bear Grass 1 Gallon 90 Festuca glauca Blue Fescue 1 Gallon 270 Shrubs Mix - A - Site Desert Mix Eriogonum fasciculatum var. polifolium Flattop buckwheat 3 Gallon 1856 • Flowers May to November • Graceful backdrop Hyptis emoryi Desert Lavender 5 Gallon 143 • Powder gray foliage and violet purple flowers spring through fall, fragrant • Mix with Creosote Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush 5 Gallon 143 • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant • Background accent or screen Sphaeralcea ambigua Desert Globemallow 3 Gallon 714 • Blooms orange -red, February -July Shrubs Mix- B - Use on Higher Spots • Bloom March -June Foquiera splendens Ocotillo 15 Gallon 40 • Attracts hummingbirds • Plant on rocky slopes, washes • Containers Only • Near Club Area/ Landforms Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 5 Gallon 600 • Spring bloom yellow • Use on dry slopes or gravelly washes • Mass plantings at hole #18 and lake edge • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush 5 Gallon 60 • Background accent or screen • Taller Accent • Shrubby wildflower perennial used for revegetation of disturbed areas Cassia nemophilla Desert Cassia 3 Gallon 360 • Gray -green foliage flowers summer into fall w/ some irrigation • Low water, easy to grow from seed GOLF SITE ZONE - PBS BUFFER SCHEME PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUAPY 6,2025 GOLF COURSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 14 982 1� PBS FENCE I - . - `- �r = - sue•- • ., - -- - ' ��- I - NOTE• I NG ADOBE CTUR WITH 75' BUFFER. SEE PAGE 22 N �- 4 �j AN : NOTE: ` ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA ESA NO GRADING! L ` •7 -e a NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA (ESA) NO GRADING! NOTE: , ,, -�, 'a, -• ' 50 PBS BUFFER ZONE. :f.,�• NO PLANTS FROM CVMSHCP - t� _ TABLE 4-113 a - .•' ' �` \ 4r. — y r NOTE: ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE `�� vr`�.4 �+ AREA (ESA) NO GRADING! MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com Olneya tesota Ironwood AZT cultivar 60" box or larger 60' 50%- 48" Box Cercidium floridum Blue Palo Verde 30%- 60" Box 30' 20%- 72" Box Field Grown, Clear Trunk 1/3 -10' ht Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm 15, 1/3 -15' ht 1/3 - 20' ht 50%- 48 Box Yucca rostrata Big Bend Yucca 30%- 60" Box 20%- 72" Box Atriplexcanescens Four -wing saltbush 5Gallon 6' Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 5 Gallon 6' Hyptis emoryi Muhlenbergia rigens Fouquieria splendens Simmondsia chinensis Hesperaloe parviflora Native Desert Grass Mix - Hilaria rigida Achnatherum hymenoides Muhlenbergia emersylleyi'Regal Mist' Nolina microcarpa Festuca glauca Shrubs Mix - A - Site Desert Mix Ambrosia deltoidea Eriogonum fasciculatum var. polifolium Hyptis emoryi Larrea tridentata Sphaeralcea ambigua Shrubs Mix - B - Use on Higher Spots Foqulera splendens Ambrosia deltoidea Desert Lavender Deergrass Ocotillo Jojoba Red Yucca Big Galleta Indian Rice Grass Bull Grass Bear Grass Blue Fescue Triangle Bur Ragweed Flattop buckwheat Desert Lavender Creosote Bush Desert Globemallow Ocotillo Triangle Bur Ragweed 5 Gallon 10, 3 Gallon 6' 15 Gallon 5 Gallon 5 Gallon 1 Gallon 1 Gallon 1 Gallon 1 Gallon 1 Gallon 3 Gallon 10, 55 • Use in small drifts, as feature on outcrops with rocky conditions or for homesite screening 75 • Native to scorching sands of far eastern Mojave and into Sonoran desert • Do not irrigate after establishment. Surround with no -irrigation planting • Signature spots, clustered where water is (in between holes) 30 • Varied trunk heights • Small natural groves, may be used selectively to accent a wash/low area w/ natural drainage or detention • Thatch skirts are to be retained • Limited use 12 • Specimen featured at rocks 50 • Spring bloom yellow 50 • Use on dry slopes or gravelly washes • Mass plantings at hole 818 and lake edge • Graceful backdrop 50 • Powder gray foliage and violet purple flowers spring through fall, fragrant • Mix with Creosote 50 • Purple bloom May -June 6 • Use in sandywaste areas as sculptural accent 50 • Dwarf 12 • Native to Mojave Desert • White flowers in spring 135 90 45 45 135 714 3 Gallon 1856 • Flowers May to November • Graceful backdrop 5Gallon 143 • Powder gray foliage and violet purple flowers spring through fall, fragrant • Mix with Creosote 5Gallon 143 • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant • Background accent or screen 3 Gallon 15 Gallon 3 Gallon 714 • Blooms orange -red, February -July • Bloom March -June 40 • Attracts hummingbirds • Plant on rocky slopes, washes • Containers Only 120 • Near Club Area/ Landforms Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 5 Gallon 600 • Spring bloom yellow • Use on dry slopes or gravelly washes • Mass plantings at hole #18 and lake edge • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush 5 Gallon 60 • Background accent or screen • Taller Accent • Shrubby wildflower perennial used for revegetation of disturbed areas Cassia nemophilla Desert Cassia 3 Gallon 360 • Gray -green foliage flowers summer into fall w/ some irrigation • Low water, easy to grow from seed GOLF SITE ZONE - A LANDSCAPE SCHEIVII GOLF COU PSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 15 983 .-4 1 • a r+� - ,,• _ _ t 7 - , w1Ji0%Tr. rvic,Tinir% n r%t-%nr rTni ir^Ti i W J MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • CIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com Olneya tesota Ironwood AZT cultivar 60" box or larger 60' OC / Foothills Palo Verde 50%- 48" Box Parkinsonia microphylla 30%- 60" Box 30' OC 20%-72"Box a �r JJJ 50%- 48 Box ' l , Prosopis gland ulosa var. [orreyana Honey Mesquite 30%-60"Box 60'OC 20%- 72" Box t Field Grown, Clear Trunk 1/3-10' ht ' -♦ Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm 1/3-15'ht 15, OC ♦.� 1/3 - 20' ht 50%- 48" Box Yucca rostrata Big Bend Yucca 30%- 60 Box 20%- 72" Box l 28 • Best used as a striking feature specimen or cluster of 3 • Do not irrigate after establishment, surround with no -irrigation planting • Use in small drifts, as feature on outcrops with rocky conditions or for homesite screening 55 • Native to scorching sands of far eastern Mojave and into Sonoran desert • Do not irrigate after establishment • Surround with no -irrigation planting 17 • Multi -trunk • Use as isolated specimens in lawn or sand/dry waste • Signature spots, clustered where water is (in between holes) • Limited Use 35 • Varied trunk heights • Small natural groves, may be used selectively to accent a wash/low area w/ natural drainage or detention • Thatch skirts are to be retained 6 • Limited use • Specimen featured at rocks Atriplex canescens Four -wing saltbush 5 Gallon 6' OC 28 • Rose -purple flowers fall into winter Dalea frutescens'Sierra Negra' Black Dalea 3 Gallon G OC 33 • Native to Chihuahan Desert • Blooms when most other plants have ceased blooming • Full sun Dalea greggii Trailing Indigo Bush 5 Gallon 10, OC 33 • Violet blue flowers late winter into spring • Native to southern Arizona and Sonoran Desert • Near Club Area/ Landforms Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 5 Gallon 6' OC 28 • Spring bloom yellow • Use on dry slopes or gravelly washes • Mass plantings at hole #18 and lake edge Hyptis emoryi Desert Lavender 5 Gallon 15' OC 28 • Graceful backdrop • Powder gray foliage and violet purple Flowers spring through fall Muhlenbergia rigens Deergrass 3 Gallon 6' OC 33 Simmondsia chinensis Sphaeralcea ambigua Native Desert Grass Mix - Hilaria rigida Achnatherum hymenoides Muhlenbergia emersylleyi'Regal Mist' Nolina microcarpa Festuca glauca Shrubs Mix - A - Site Desert Ma Ambrosia deltoidea Eriogonum fasciculatum var. polifolium Hyptis emoryi Larrea tridentata Sphaeralcea ambigua Shrubs Mix - B - Use on Higher Spots Foquiera splendens Ambrosia deltoidea Encelia farinosa Larrea tridentata Jojoba 5 Gallon 6' OC 33 • Native to Sonoran desert • Screen or background Desert Globemallow 3Gallon 6'OC 28 •Blooms orange -red, February -July Big Galleta 1 Gallon 135 Indian Rice Grass 1 Gallon 90 Bull Grass 1 Gallon 45 Bear Grass 1 Gallon 45 Blue Fescue 1 Gallon 135 Triangle Bur Ragweed 3 Gallon 3' OC 441 Flattop buckwheat 3Gallon 8' OC Desert Lavender 5 Gallon 15' OC Creosote Bush 5 Gallon 20' OC Desert Globemallow 3 Gallon G OC Ocotillo 5 Gallon 45' OC Triangle Bur Ragweed 3 Gallon 3' OC Brittlebush 5 Gallon 6' OC Creosote Bush 5 Gallon 20' OC 1148 • Flowers May to November • Graceful backdrop 87 • Powder gray foliage and violet purple Flowers spring through fall, fragrant • Mix with Creosote 87 • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant • Background accent or screen 441 • Blooms orange -red, February -July • Bloom March -June 19 • Attracts hummingbirds • Plant on rocky slopes, washes • Containers Only 57 • Near Club Area/ Landforms 281 • Spring bloom yellow • Use on dry slopes or gravelly washes • Mass plantings at hole #18 and lake edge • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant 30 • Background accent or screen • Taller Accent • Shrubby wildflower perennial used for revegetation of disturbed areas Cassia nemophllla Desert Cassia 3Gallon 6'OC 168 •Gray -green foliage flowers summer into fall w/ some irrigation • Low water, easy to grow from seed Mix - C - Used Around Drifting Sand/Bunkers 1/3 -1 Gallon Agave desert i Desert Agave 1/3-3Gallon 6'OC 142 • Containers Only 1/3 - 5 Gallon Opuntia bigelovii Teddy Bear or Jumping Cholla 50%-1 Gallon 8' OC 95 • Containers Only 50%- 3 Gallon Verbena sp. Verbena 3 Gallon 6'OC 713 • Use by itself as dramatic display in large sandy waste areas • Seed in fall, rose to purple flowers spreading widely with trailing stems with fall and early spring rains Ambrosia deltoidea Triangle Bur Ragweed 3 Gallon 3' OC 285 • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush 5 Gallon 20, OC 71 • Background accent or screen • Taller Accent GOLF SITE ZONE - B LANDSCAPE SCHEMEI D. GOLF COU PSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE 16 984 r . • 4• : 4 '•�•.. V. .�j'y• y � J ,•' r • { 1 •y.���t (1�.�t(.t.'.. ail' -\ ��/;•�••�y •� �r • ( I � i• 3�s•� � ; . � rrLL tiJ��-�n}} ,� 2 i � •'• '� • • %: �{ '� •� .1 (,k i 1 l a , , 4 4 a>r: NOTE: EXISTING AD E STRUCTURE ZWIT FFER. SEE PAGE`, A e i• ' MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • CIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com Caesalpinia cacolacoa'Smoothie Thornless Cascalote 70%-48Box 30'OC 30%-60' Box 50%-48" Box Cercidium'Sonoran Emerald' Sonoran Emerald Palo Verde 30%-60" Box 30' OC 20%-72" Box 50%-48 Box Cercidium praecox Palo Brea 30%- 60" Box 50' OC 20%- 72" Box Field Grown, Clear Trunk - 24 Box Brahea'Clara' Clara Blue Palm 1/1/33-36 "Box 20'OC 1/3 - 48" Box Field Grown, Clear Trunk 1/3 1 -' ht Washingtonia filifera California Fan Palm 1/3-150' ht 15, OC 1/3 - 20' ht Atriplex ranescens Dalea frutescens'Sierra Negra' Dalea greggii Encelia farinosa Hyptis emoryi Muhlenbergia rigens Simmondsia chinensis Sphaeralcea ambigua Native Desert Grass Mix - Hilaria rigida Achnatherum hymenoides Muhlenbergia emersylleyi'Regal Mist' Nolina microcarpa Festuca glauca Shrubs Mix - A- Site Desert Ma Ambrosia deltoidea Eriogonum fasciculatum var. polifolium Hyptis emoryi IF.1717W.M1011i:1 • Winter blooming, yellow, evergreen foliage, thornless 60 •Best in dry areas • Scale good in clusters for lot screening, good shade for desert accents 65 • Graceful form of Palo Verde hybrid with a more blue-green trunk • Use as single low branch specimen features on outcrops w/ rocky conditions 30 • Needs pruning to accentuate the crooked branches (or not) • Sculptural • Native to Sonoran Desert • Silver gray foliage • Use in small clusters with Washingtonla fl fera groves 15 • Should be near natural drainage/low, area/water • Lawn tolerant or sandy • Native to Baja California • Signature spots, clustered where water is (n between holes) Unnifted Use 40 • Varied trunk heights • Small natural groves, may be used selectively to accent a wash/low area w/ natural drainage or detention • Thatch skirts are to be retained Four -wing saltbush 5 Gallon 6OC 52 • Rose -purple flowers fall into winter • Native to Chihuahan Desert Black Dalea 5 Gallon 6' OC 52 • Blooms when most other plants have ceased blooming • Plant with Dalea greggii groundcover (possible range accent planting) • Full sun Trailing Indigo Bush 5 Gallon 10, OC 52 • Violet blue flowers late winter into spring • Native to southern Arizona and Sonoran Desert • Near Club Area/ Landforms Brittlebush 5 Gallon V OC 47 • Spring bloom yellow • Use on dry slopes or gravelly washes • Mass plantings at hole #18 and lake edge Desert Lavender 5 Gallon 15, OC 47 • Graceful backdrop • Powder gray foliage and violet purple flowers spring through fall Deergrass 3 Gallon V OC 52 Jojoba 5 Gallon 6' OC 47 • Native to Sonoran desert • Screen or background Desert Globemallow 3 Gallon V OC 52 • Blooms orange -red, February -July Big Galleta 1 Gallon 135 Indian Rice Grass 1 Gallon 90 Bull Grass 1 Gallon 45 Bear Grass 1 Gallon 45 Blue Fescue 1 Gallon 135 Triangle Bur Ragweed 3 Gallon 3' OC Flattop buckwheat 3 Gallon V OC Desert Lavender 5 Gallon 15' OC Creosote Bush 5 Gallon 20' OC 918 2385 • Flowers May to November • Graceful backdrop 183 • Powder gray foliage and violet purple flowers spring through fall, fragrant • Mix with Creosote 183 • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant • Background accent or screen Sphaeralcea ambigua Desert Globemallow 3 Gallon V OC 918 • Blooms orange -red, February -July Shrubs Mix - B - Use on Higher Spots • Bloom March -June Foquiera splendens Ocotillo 5 Gallon 25' OC 32 • Attracts hummingbirds • Plant on rocky slopes, washes • Containers Only Ambrosia deltoidea Triangle Bur Ragweed 3 Gallon 3' OC 96 • Near Club Area/ Landforms Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 5 Gallon V OC 480 • Spring bloom yellow • Use on dry slopes or gravelly washes • Mass plantings at hole #18 and lake edge • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush 5 Gallon 20' OC 48 • Background accent or screen • Taller Accent • Shrubby wildflower perennial used for revegetation of disturbed areas Cassia nemophilla Desert Cassia 3 Gallon 6OC 288 • Gray -green foliage flowers summer into fall w/ some irrigation • Low water, easy to grow from seed Mix - C - Used Around Drifting SandBunkers 1/3 -1 Gallon Agave deserti Desert Agave 1/3 -3 Gallon VOC 350 • Containers Only 1/3 - 5 Gallon Opuntia bill Teddy Bear or Jumping Cholla 50%-I Gallon 50%- 3 Gallon 810C 234 • Containers Only Verbena sp. Verbena 3 Gallon G OC 288 • Use by itself as dramatic display in large sandy waste areas • Seed in fall, rose to purple flowers spreading widely with trailing stems with fall and early spring rains Ambrosia deltoidea Triangle Bur Ragweed 3 Gallon 3' OC 702 • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush 5 Gallon 20' OC 176 • Background accent or screen • Taller Accent GOLF SITE ZONE - C LANDSCAPE SCHEME PAGE . D. -. .. GOLF COU PSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 17 985 (1 / . : f , 44 1 x 0 MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1 760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com Caesalpinia cacolacoa 'Smoothie' Cercidium praecox Olneya tesota Parkinsonia microphylla Prosopis glandulosa var. torreyana Brahea'Clara' Washingtonia filifera Agave desmettiana Thornless Cascalote Ironwood AZT cultivar Foothills Palo Verde Honey Mesquite Clara Blue Palm California Fan Palm Agave 70%-48 Box 3V OC 30%- 60" Box 50%-48" Bon 30%- 60" Box 50, OC 20%- 72" Box 70%-48 Box 60, OC 30%- 60" Box 50%-48'. Box 30%- 60 Box 30' OC 20%- 72" Box 70%-48 Box 30%- 60" Box 60' OC Field Grown, Clear Trunk 1/3 - 24" Box 20' OC 1/3 - 36' Box 1/3 - 48" Box Field Grown, Clear Trunk 1/3-10'ht 15, OC 1/3 - 15' ht 1/3 - 20' ht 3 Gallon V OC Dalea frutescens'Sierra Negra' Black Dalea 3 Gallon V OC Dalea greggii Trailing Indigo Bush 5Gallon 10, OC Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 5Gallon VOC Hyptis emoryi Desert Lavender 5 Gallon 15' OC Muhlenbergia rigens Sphaeralcea ambigua _ r_ _ Native Desert Grass Mix - Hilaria rigida Achnatherum hymenoides Muhlenbergia ememylleyi'Regal Mist' Nolina microcarpa Festuca glauca Shrubs Mix - A - Site Desert Mix Ambrosia deltoidea Eriogonum fasciculatum var. polifolium Hyptis emoryi 71112711111115, • Winter blooming,yellow, evergreen foliage, thornless 48 • Best in dry areas • Scale good in clusters for lot screening, good shade for desert accents • Use as single low branch specimen features on outcrops w/ rocky conditions 18 • Needs pruning to accentuate the crooked branches (or not) • Sculptural • Native to Sonoran Desert • Positive drainage/dry settings 33 • Alternate with Texas Ebony for fairway screening and framing views from lots • Slow growth, pair with faster shrub massing 48 • Use in small groupings • In dry conditions with Agave geminiflora, Encelia and wildflowers 18 • Multi -trunk • Use as isolated specimens in lawn or sand/dry waste • Faster growth than other Brahea armata • Use in small clusters with Washingtonia filifera groves 25 • Should be near natural drainage/low area/water • Lawn tolerant or sandy • Native to Baja California • Signature Spots, Clustered where water is (in between holes) • Limited Use 55 • Varied trunk heights • Small natural groves, may be used selectively to accent a wash/low area w/ natural drainage or detention • Thatch skirts are to be retained 62 • Use in sun or part shade of Mesquite, Palo Brea or Ironwood trees as spaced grouping with gravel, boulders • Rose -purple flowers fall into winter 62 • Native to Chihuahan Desert • Blooms when most other plants have ceased blooming • Plant with Dalea greggii groundcover (possible range accent planting) Full sun 62 • Violet blue flowers late winter into spring • Native to southern Arizona and Sonoran Desert • Near Club Area / Landforms 54 • Spring bloom yellow • Use on dry slopes or gravelly washes • Mass plantings at hole #18 and lake edge 54 • Graceful backdrop • Powder gray foliage and violet purple flowers spring through fall Deer Grass 3 Gallon V OC 62 Apricot Mallow 3 Gallon V OC 54 Big Galleta 1 Gallon 135 Indian Rice Grass 1 Gallon 90 Bull Grass 1 Gallon 45 Bear Grass 1 Gallon 45 Blue Fescue 1 Gallon 135 Triangle Bur Ragweed 3 Gallon 3' OC 1104 Flattop buckwheat 3 Gallon 8' OC Desert Lavender 5 Gallon 15' OC Creosote Bush 5 Gallon 2V OC 2870 • Flowers May to November • Graceful backdrop 221 •Powder gray foliage and violet purple flowers spring through fall, fragrant • Mix with Creosote 221 • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant • Background accent or screen Sphaeralcea ambigua Desert Globemallow 3 Gallon 6' OC 1104 • Blooms orange -red, February -July Shrubs Mix - B - Use on Higher Spots • Bloom March -June Foquiera splendens Ocotillo 5 Gallon 25' OC 30 ' Attracts hummingbirds • Plant on rocky slopes, washes • Containers Only Ambrosia deltoidea Triangle Bur Ragweed 3 Gallon 3' OC 90 • Near Club Area/ Landforms Encelia farinosa Brittlebush 5 Gallon V OC 453 • Spring bloom yellow • Use on dry slopes or gravelly washes • Mass plantings at hole #18 and lake edge • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant Larrea tridentate Creosote Bush 5 Gallon 2V OC 45 • Background accent or screen • Taller Accent • Shrubby wildflower perennial used for revegetation of disturbed areas Cassia nemophilla Desert Cassia 3 Gallon V OC 272 • Gray -green foliage flowers summer into fall w/ some irrigation • Low water, easy to grow from seed Mix - C - Used Around Drifting Sand/Bunkers Agave deserti Desert Agave 50%- 1 Gallon 50%- 3 Gallon V OC 482 • Containers Only Opuntia bigelovii Teddy Bear or Jumping Cholla 3 Gallon V OC 482 • Containers Only 1/3 -1 Gal Ion Verbena sp. Verbena 1/3 - 3 Gallon 6' ON: 1600 1/3 - 5 Gallon Ambrosia deltoidea Triangle Bur Ragweed 3 Gallon 3' oC 965 • Use by itself as dramatic display in large sandy waste areas • Seed in fall, rose to purple flowers spreading widely with trailing stems with fall and early spring rains • Green, tough, lush green for desert plant Larrea tridentata Creosote Bush 5Gallon )00C 240 • Background accentorscreen • Taller Accent GOLF SITE ZONE - D LANDSCAPE SCHEME PAGE . D. -. .. GOLF COU PSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 18 986 MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com SCALE 1"=100'-0" 50' 100' 200' 300' _J GOLF SITE LANDSCAPE SCHEME PAGE GOLF COURSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 19 987 ZONE "A" PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE JQTY TREES �1 OLN TES OLNEYA TESOTA / IRONWOOD c. AZT 601, 55 CER FLO CERCIDIUM FLORIDUM / BLUE PALO VERDE 48" + BOX 75 YUC ROS YUCCA ROSTRATA / BIG BEND YUCCA BOX 12 PALM TREES WAS FIL WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA / CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 10' - 20' HT 30 SHRUBS 0 ATR CAN ATRIPLEX CANESCENS / FOUR WING SALTBUSH 5 GAL 50 0 ENC FAR ENCELIA FARINOSA/ BRITTLEBUSH 5 GAL 50 0 HYP EMO HYPTIS EMORYI / DESERT LAVENDER 5 GAL 50 0 MUH RIG MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEERGRASS 3 GAL 50 ® FOU SPL FOUQUIERIA SPLENDENS / OCOTILLO 15 GAL 6 0 SIM CHI SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS / JOJOBA 5 GAL 50 HES PAR HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA / RED YUCCA 5 GAL 12 SHRUBS AREA - MIX A 0 AMB DEL AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA / TRIANGLE BUR RAGWEED 3 GAL 714 0 ERI FAS ERIOGONUM FASCICULATUM V. POLIFOLIUM / FLATTOP BUCKWHEAT 3 GAL 1,856 0 HYP EMO HYPTIS EMORYI / DESERT LAVENDER 5 GAL 143 0 LAR TRI LARREA TRIDENTATA / CREOSOTE BUSH 5 GAL 143 ® SPH AMB SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA / DESERT GLOBEMALLOW 3 GAL 714 MIX -A SHRUB SEED MIX - A (30LBS/ACRE) 8.5 AC 255 LB SHRUBS AREA - MIX B (� AMB DEL AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA / TRIANGLE BUR RAGWEED 3 GAL 120 0 ENC FAR ENCELIA FARINOSA/ BRITTLEBUSH 5 GAL 600 0 FOQ SPL FOQUIERA SPLENDENS / OCOTILLO 15 GAL 40 0 LAR TRI LARREA TRIDENTATA / CREOSOTE BUSH 5 GAL �60 0 CAS NEM CASSIA NEMOPHILLA / DESERT CASSIA 3 GAL 360 -- MIX - B SHRUB SEED MIX - B (25LBS/ACRE) 2.5 AC 63 LB SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER- DESERT FLOOR W HIL RIG HILARIA RIGIDA 1 GAL 135 . W . ACH HYM ACHNATHERUM HYMENOIDES 1 GAL g0 W , W MUH EM MUHLENBERGIA EMERSYLLEYI 'REGAL MIST' 1 GAL 45 • W " NOL MIC NOLINA MICROCARPA 1 GAL 45 W W ` FES GLA FESTUCA GLAUCA 1 GAL 135 ZONE "B" PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL ICODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE QTY T��REES OLN TES OLNEYA TESOTA / IRONWOOD c. AZT BOX 28 PAR MIC PARKINSONIA MICROPHYLLA / FOOTHILL PALO VERDE 48' + BOX 55 0 PRO GLA PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA V. TORREYANA / HONEY MESQUITE 48' + BOX 17 YUC ROS YUCCA ROSTRATA / BIG BEND YUCCA BOX 6 PALM TREES WAS FIL WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA / CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 10' - 20' HT 35 SHRUBS 0 ATR CAN ATRIPLEX CANESCENS / FOUR WING SALTBUSH 5 GAL 28 DAL FRU DALEA FRUTESCENS 'SIERRA NEGRA' / BLACK DALEA 3 GAL 33 0 DAL GRE DALEA GREGGII / TRAILING INDIGO BUSH 5 GAL 33 0 ENC FAR ENCELIA FARINOSA/ BRITTLEBUSH 5 GAL 28 0 HYP EMO HYPTIS EMORYI / DESERT LAVENDER 5 GAL 28 O MUH RIG MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEERGRASS 3 GAL 33 0 SIM CHI SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS / JOJOBA 5 GAL 33 ® SPH AMB SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA / DESERT GLOBEMALLOW 3 GAL 28 SHRUBS AREA - MIX A 0 AMB DEL AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA / TRIANGLE BUR RAGWEED 3 GAL 441 ® ERI FAS ERIOGONUM FASCICULATUM V. POLIFOLIUM / FLATTOP BUCKWHEAT 3 GAL 1148 0 HYP EMO HYPTIS EMORYI / DESERT LAVENDER 5 GAL 87 0 LAR TRI LARREA TRIDENTATA / CREOSOTE BUSH 5 GAL 87 ® SPH AMB SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA / DESERT GLOBEMALLOW 3 GAL 441 I MIX - A SHRUB SEED MIX -A (30LBS/ACRE) 4.6 AC 138 LB SHRUBS AREA - MIX B 0 AMB DEL AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA / TRIANGLE BUR RAGWEED 3 GAL 57 0 ENC FAR ENCELIA FARINOSA/ BRITTLEBUSH 5 GAL 281 0 FOQ SPL FOQUIERA SPLENDENS / OCOTILLO 3 GAL 19 0 LAR TRI LARREA TRIDENTATA / CREOSOTE BUSH 5 GAL 30 ® SEN COV CASSIA NEMOPHILLA / DESERT CASSIA 3 GAL 168 -==MIX - B SHRUB SEED MIX - B (25LBS/ACRE) 1.3 AC 33 LB SHRUBS AREA - MIX C 0 ABR VIL ABRONIA VILLOSA / SAND VERBENA 3 GAL 713 Q AGA DES AGAVE DESERTI / DESERT AGAVE 1,3,5 GAL 142 0 AMB DEL AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA / TRIANGLE BUR RAGWEED 3 GAL 285 O OPU BIG OPUNTIA BIGELLOVI / TEDDY BEAR OR JUMPING CHOLLA 1,3 GAL 95 LAR TRI LARREA TRIDENTATA / CREOSOTE BUSH 5 GAL 71 Mix - c i SHRUB SEED MIX - C (25LBS/ACRE) 3.3 AC 83 LB SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER- DESERT FLOOR `HIL RIG HILARIA RIGIDA 1 GAL 135 W W W ACH HYM ACHNATHERUM HYMENOIDES 1 GAL 90 W W, W MUH EME MUHLENBERGIA EMERSYLLEYI 'REGAL MIST' 1 GAL 45 • W " NOL MIC NOLINA MICROCARPA 1 GAL 45 W , " FES GLA FESTUCA GLAUCA 1 GAL 135 ZONE "C" PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE QTY TREES CAE cac CAESALPINIA CACOLACOA'SMOOTHIE' / THORNLESS CASCALOTE 48" + BOX 60 CER SON CERCIDIUM 'SONORAN EMERALD' / SONORAN EMERALD PALO VERDE 48" + BOX 65 0 CER PRA CERCIDIUM PRAECOX / PALO BREA BOX 30 PALM TREES BRA CLA BRAHEA'CLARA' / CLARA BLUE PALM 10 20' HT 15 WAS FIL WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA / CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 24" + BOX 40 SHRUBS 0 ATR CAN ATRIPLEX CANESCENS / FOUR WING SALTBUSH 5 GAL 52 0 DAL FRU DALEA FRUTESCENS 'SIERRA NEGRA' / BLACK DALEA 3 GAL 52 0 DAL GRE DALEA GREGGII / TRAILING INDIGO BUSH 5 GAL 52 0 ENC FAR ENCELIA FARINOSA/ BRITTLEBUSH 5 GAL 47 0 HYP EMo HYPTIS EMORYI / DESERT LAVENDER 5 GAL 47 0 MUH RIG MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEERGRASS 3 GAL 52 0 SIM CHI SIMMONDSIA CHINENSIS / JOJOBA 5 GAL 47 ® SPH AMB SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA / DESERT GLOBEMALLOW 3 GAL 52 SHRUBS AREA - MIX A 0 AMB DEL AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA / TRIANGLE BUR RAGWEED 3 GAL 918 0 ERI FAS ERIOGONUM FASCICULATUM V. POLIFOLIUM / FLATTOP BUCKWHEAT 3 GAL 2385 0 HYP EMO HYPTIS EMORYI / DESERT LAVENDER 5 GAL 183 LAR TRI LARREA TRIDENTATA / CREOSOTE BUSH 5 GAL 183 ® SPH AMB SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA / DESERT GLOBEMALLOW 3 GAL 918 MIX -A SHRUB SEED MIX -A (30LBS/ACRE) 8.5 AC 255 LB SHRUBS AREA - MIX B 0 AMB DEL AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA / TRIANGLE BUR RAGWEED 3 GAL 96 0 ENC FAR ENCELIA FARINOSA/ BRITTLEBUSH 5 GAL 480 0 FOQ SPL FOQUIERA SPLENDENS / OCOTILLO 5 GAL 32 0 LAR TRI LARREA TRIDENTATA / CREOSOTE BUSH 5 GAL 48 ® CAS NEM CASSIA NEMOPHILLA / DESERT CASSIA 3 GAL 288 -= MIx- B SHRUB SEED MIX - B (25LBS/ACRE) 2.5 AC 63 LB SHRUBS AREA - MIX C 0 VER SP. VERBENA SP. / VERBENA 3 GAL 288 Q AGA DES AGAVE DESERTI / DESERT AGAVE 1,3,5 GAL 350 0 AMB DEL AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA / TRIANGLE BUR RAGWEED 3 GAL 702 O OPU BIG OPUNTIA BIGELOVII / TEDDY BEAR OR JUMPING CHOLLA 1,3 GAL 234 0 LAR TRI LARREA TRIDENTATA / CREOSOTE BUSH 5 GAL 176 MIx - C SHRUB SEED MIX - C (25LBS/ACRE) 6.1 AC 153 LB SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER- DESERT FLOOR W W W HIL RIG HILARIA RIGIDA 1 GAL 135 W , W ACH HYM ACHNATHERUM HYMENOIDES 1 GAL g0 W MUH EM MUHLENBERGIA EMERSYLLEYI REGAL MIST' 1 GAL 45 . W W NOL MIC NOLINA MICROCARPA 1 GAL 45 FES GLA FESTUCA GLAUCA 1 GAL 135 ZONE "D" PLANT LEGEND SYMBOL CODE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME ISIZE QTY TREES 0 CAE cac CAESALPINIA CACOLACOA'SMOOTHIE' / THORNLESS CASCALOTE 48" + BOX 48 CER PRA CERCIDIUM PRAECOX / PALO BREA BOX 18 OLN TES OLNEYA TESOTA / IRONWOOD c. AZT BOX 33 PAR MIC PARKINSONIA MICROPHYLLA / FOOTHILL PALO VERDE 48" + BOX 48 PRO GLA PROSOPIS GLANDULOSA V. TORREYANA / HONEY MESQUITE 48" + BOX 18 PALM TREES BRA CLA BRAHEA'CLARA' / CLARA BLUE PALM 101- 20' HT 25 WAS FIL WASHINGTONIA FILIFERA / CALIFORNIA FAN PALM 24" + BOX 55 SHRUBS 0 AGA DES AGAVE DESMETTIANA / AGAVE 3 GAL 62 ® DAL FRU DALEA FRUTESCENS 'SIERRA NEGRA' / BLACK DALEA 3 GAL 62 ® DAL GRE DALEA GREGGII / TRAILING INDIGO BUSH 5 GAL 62 0 ENC FAR ENCELIA FARINOSA/ BRITTLEBUSH 5 GAL 54 0 HYP EMO HYPTIS EMORYI / DESERT LAVENDER 5 GAL 54 O MUH RIG MUHLENBERGIA RIGENS / DEERGRASS 3 GAL 62 ® SPH AMB SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA / APRICOT MALLOW 3 GAL 54 SHRUBS AREA - MIX A 0 AMB DEL AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA / TRIANGLE BUR RAGWEED 3 GAL 1104 0 ERI FAS ERIOGONUM FASCICULATUM V. POLIFOLIUM / FLATTOP BUCKWHEAT 3 GAL 2870 0 HYP EMO HYPTIS EMORYI / DESERT LAVENDER 5 GAL 221 LAR TRI LARREA TRIDENTATA / CREOSOTE BUSH 5 GAL 221 ® SPH AMB SPHAERALCEA AMBIGUA / DESERT GLOBEMALLOW 3 GAL 1104 MIX - A SHRUB SEED MIX - A (30LBS/ACRE) 9.2 AC 276 LB SHRUBS AREA - MIX B 0 AMB DEL AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA /TRIANGLE BUR RAGWEED 3 GAL 90 0 ENC FAR ENCELIA FARINOSA/ BRITTLEBUSH 5 GAL 453 0 FOQ SPL FOQUIERA SPLENDENS / OCOTILLO 5 GAL 30 0 LAR TRI LARREA TRIDENTATA / CREOSOTE BUSH 5 GAL 45 ® CAS NEM CASSIA NEMOPHILLA / DESERT CASSIA 3 GAL 272 ---MIx- e SHRUB SEED MIX- B (25LBS/ACRE) 2.7 AC 68 LB SHRUBS AREA - MIX C 0 VER SP. VERBENA, SP. / VERBENA GAL 1600 0 AGA DES AGAVE DESERTI / DESERT AGAVE 1,3 GAL 482 0 AMB DEL AMBROSIA DELTOIDEA / TRIANGLE BUR RAGWEED 3 GAL 965 0 OPU BIG OPUNTIA BIGELOVII/ TEDDY BEAR OR JUMPING CHOLLA 3 GAL 482 0 LAR TRI LARREA TRIDENTATA / CREOSOTE BUSH 5 GAL 240 MIx - c SHRUB SEED MIX - C (25LBS/ACRE) 6.7 AC 168 LB SHRUBS/GROUNDCOVER- DESERT FLOOR HIL RIG HILARIA RIGIDA 1 GAL 135 ACH HYM ACHNATHERUM HYMENOIDES 1 GAL 90 W W . MUH EME MUHLENBERGIA EMERSYLLEYI 'REGAL MIST' 1 GAL 45 W W . NOL MIC NOLINA MICROCARPA 1 GAL 45 , FES GLA FESTUCA GLAUCA 1 GAL 135 MSA "elINSU XI NG, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1 760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com GOLF SITE LANDSCAPE SCHEME PLANT LEGEND GOLF COU PSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAGE Ik , :, s d1 _! Ak t ' 416 10 F!" IL y,NOUN N ATIVE SITE MATERIALS/ ROCK FORMATION TAN DECOMPOSED GRANITE - - - ''�~�� - ��_..�ct � - •+- -•n .�;�,4�7-'+�y�„��, i�� � �',�� •3 .,� •. Via, A. ?r. .��iz-�y � �, - ,.yy��ti+. -! 1ta � ... „- -��, . .•-+t•- _tr'-:• . - - �. - _ }y♦. �f �k,.,,�t����`+�� ��.� �-•`>_1'��..��.i•:`�e•...•_'�a-w. 'T'it �,.a-�'�'F2'i '. �i"Ge^��� �-,: - ,�..�i• r _ ~ - Lr-' ~j. - _ - . _ � - .�+..R-'S'•` M! ,i: :r�.-.+. �.1,.� �„ x�_AC�•� Y'..�`:` .•�'v� �.:. .ear.- '..�Z l A •+A��,'K-�j}. R^ v �_ c.� 'y° � 'L.. "'iet�_ i �ti'•L �.� 1 �' 1111 - . ` _ RdM•, 1#.s. -, •.c 3�.., •••i5.;:�.t - - ., • ' V ,•a` r_�,. tea'•?L�m _ .. - _ - - ).� r-.- ♦ .-"`.S. r � - � :•,� "FSr-'�M�l, '`_'`• -' Ry ' ,.. - 1 �. ITT jG:. - - - ` __ ' _ - ./ Kt ? `, ••�'.e="^"p "�• '�•igac_. , ••r•l4I-ice �' 1, Wit; V 1 - - - _ _ - - .y ti�:. � tom. ,` r� �•Sr -•. i.a._ •" `.R`' • •;1.:�'`'�-y �i`t\f;`., ;1•� 1 _•r,' tZ r - _ a �. - - __� t �!�••�'��'. � _- .. Lam. _��.••"_ ;,:TS`�� � '•�.l •c 7 �.rv-.'yia, , r. ,-j'��`1:r - `•�. �'S.�� '. _ i'A• .`. •t•ka =Si ti: crYw.P:-f'ZR"-+`ti 1- -��� _ '' ' - •• - - '� -• F_-� a--� 'f� -. ,��- i'-At � ,1�•'..� ..-:_+w:r �Y ha `i-. +. i..�A,a w.Ce 2�. f 'p' �. �y i s_,+�.�ap�-s-h_, �• l � :•. _ � '. - _a::' _ tJ +•sr.}t." _ 'r , ,y�..� �-a t. ': .ea 1�61-',. 1'�" �`, .� ^'� ral.-- .Zs'1i•�i: 1 . t _ - "y"'^` �y �•'.- ,'S-• t Y.'^,�,�_ J►'af.c ' �' �. �t�: - •'C.._ �'.,yrtr^�• •� � ` _ � _ ....:., -,e.. �..r ter• ) - - _ ,�etwwi�r�� S�`•�•.,,�.•tia - _ "_��a `• - ".`'^'rr,.Zi`•v'r-��r i..,�i�u'I '" ^� • a •_ -M�1 _ e' /. � � ._ . ���F`y.`. - y - .�ti„ ',�,�e'•�,•�n�_-, 'V�e?�'�..�� L1�:. !ri � _.:.':t;1,`, i�rii�'�j! ' ��.�''� _ •:�'i :�._. � -. �.4�•R�i _'�R•••r.�`:.. C�. _ ��Y` 'i��'�.�'.�_ ..��`.�� = +-�..'` = ,r}..=�. - Ad 14AI AL f. ir All �' t'• �► 1� :� "� .M 1. fir• t (�{�% 44 It ot NATIVE COARSE SAND MATERIAL IMPORTED ROCK MATERIAL USE OF INERT LANDSCAPE MATERIALS IN GOLF COURSE CONSTRUCTION 1. Nati e Soils Nati a soils will be carefully reapplied and graded in disturbed areas to reestablish a surface that supports natural stability and ecological function. Reapplied soils are intended to promote the re-formation of a natural desert crust, which minimizes erosion, captures fine sediments, and regulates surface hydrology. Application will generally occur in out -of -play areas, at the margins of fairways, and within rough -graded nati a zones where vegetation will be restored. 2_ Coarse Nati e Sand and Decomposed Granite Coarse nati a sand and decomposed granite may be used as surface treatments to create a stable, erosion -resistant layer. Typical applications include: • Transition zones between turf and nati a areas. • Along golf cart paths and service routes. • Non -play desert areas where dust control and stability are priorities. These materials will be installed in a manner that blends with surrounding grades and natural topography, reducing visual contrast between constructed and undisturbed areas. 3. Nati e Rock and Boulders Nati e rock and boulders will be selectively placed to reinforce slopes, stabilize drainageways, and visually anchor the landscape. Typical applications include: • Within washes, swales, and natural drainage corridors. • At the toe of slopes or other erosion -prone areas. • To define edges of disturbed areas and visually integrate the course into its desert settin Rock placement will also be used to slow and disperse runoff, helping restore natural water flow pa erns. 4. Flexibility in Applicatio Final placement and quantities of inert materials may vary based on field conditions, grading tolerances, and ecological opportunities encountered during construction Adjustments in the field will be guided by the overall goal of stabilizing disturbed soils, reducing erosion, and restoring a landscape character consistent with the Coachella Valley desert environment. MSA CONSU TING? INC. Civil Engineering - Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1 760,320.9811 1 MSAConsultinginc.com GOLF SITE INERT LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: FEBRUAPY 6,2025 GOLF COURSE AT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 21 989 A ADOBE HOUSE PROPOSED FENCE AND ACCESS GATE PLAN EXISTING ADOBE HOUSE 5' HT. METAL ACCESS GATE 5' HT. FENCE 2"X2" METAL PICKETS (6" SPACING) B ADOBE HOUSE PROPOSED FENCE AND ACCESS GATE ELEVATION V=10,0" STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL FENCE AND ACCESS GATE 2"x2" METAL PICKETS (6" SPACING) FUTURE DEVELOPMENT EXISTING ADOBE HOUSE KEY�AP N.T.S. � u I I I I I I L-----------i NOTE: SUBJECT TO FURTHER DESIGN REFINEMENT AND/OR SUBSTITUTION WITH A COMPARABLE QUALITY MATERIAL 1" rS/,L� GONSULTIN , I :Go Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Goordination • 615 54200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G2210 I-f60.520.9811 I M5AGonau Iting inc.com ADOBE HOUSE PAS C OLF GOURSE AT GOZAL MOUNTA IN GLUE 1 51 TE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 22 990 III 1" rSlz\ GONSULT N.0 , ING. Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning . Environmental Services . Dry Utility Goordination . CIS 54200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G22-70 1 -760.520.G81I MSAGonsu Itinginc.com HART HOW E RTON NEW YCW • SAN FKANCISCfl PA C) L) rl IMA LANDSCAPE 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax: 212 481 3768 Email : NY@harthowerton.com M SHEET INDEX L1.01-C L4.01-C ENVIRONMENTAL �i SENSITIVE AREA, NO GRADE LINE THE DRD TRAIL ALIGNMENT IS CONCEPTUAL. THIS ALIGNMENT IS CONCEPTUAL AND SUBJECT TO COORDINATION WITH ACBCI, DRD AND OTHERS. NOTE: RESTORED NATIVE TRAIL SURFACED WITH — DECOMPOSED GRANITE AND NATIVE FINES MATERIAL. TRAIL EDGES DEFINED WITH USE OF EXISTING ROCKS. NO NEW PLANTING OR IRRIGATION PROPOSED TO ENSURE NATIVE AESTHETICS ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVE AREA, NO GRADE LINE CONCEPTUAL PBS BARRIER FENCE___ - � 1 i, ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVE AREA, mn r_RnnP i irxir= III HART $ORATE RTON ------ ----------------------- - _ X> , ANDALUSIA +, s COUNTRY CLUB rr i � r1 -- O w w w w Q Q Q Q C)LO �LO U)LO C)LO o� o� o� oC) C'7 Q J cy) M C'7 Ir CV � O CV O CV O CV O r J z C\7 J z cy) O J z O J z N � lj r 0— 0— C�l 0— 0— C) 0— 0— C�l 0— 0— LANDSCAPE L0.00 OVERALL SITE PLAN X X X X L1.01 MATERIAL PLAN X X X X L1.02 MATERIAL PLAN X X X X L1.03 MATERIAL PLAN X X X X L1.04 MATERIAL PLAN X X X X L2.01 MATERIAL IMAGERY X X X X L3.01 SITE SECTION & ELEVATION & MATERIAL IMAGERY X X X X L3.02 PERIMETER WALL DETAILS X L4.00 PLANTING SCHEDULE X X X X L4.01 PLANTING PLAN X X X X L4.02 PLANTING PLAN X X X X L4.03 PLANTING PLAN X X X X L4.04 PLANTING PLAN X X X X ABBREVIATIONS CL CENTERLINE MIN MINIMUM PA PLANTING AREA PL PROPERTY LINE ROW RIGHT OF WAY TYP TYPICAL PROPOSED PERIMETER WALL EXISTING NEIGHBOR WALL CONCEPTUAL 8' HT. PBS BARRIER FENCE NOTE: LOCATION TO BE FIELD VERIFIED UNDER SUPERVISION OF ARCHAEOLOGIST AND OR BIOLOGIST. PROPOSED ONE-WAY SHEEP GATE -� NOTE: LOCATION AND/OR QUANTITY TO BE FIELD VERIFIED n PROPOSED ACCESS GATE NOTE: LOCATION AND/OR QUANTITY TO BE FIELD VERIFIED OVERALL SITE PLAN M O ,A G O S U I T I G/ I G. , 1, NEW YOW - SAN FRANCISM Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 Planning . Environmental Services . Dry Utility Goordination . CIS Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax: 212 481 3768 54200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA 922-70 1 -760.520.G811 Email : NY@harthowerton.com MSAGonsu Iting inc.com FFEL M M/L�R­r L/L�MDOO/,�\FE ML/\M FOR TTM 5MO5b FAGS LO.00 992 A-Z 1" rS/,A\ SONSULT NC , ING. Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning . Environmental Services . Dry Utility Goordination . CIS 54200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G22-70 1 -760.520.G81I MSAGonsu Itinginc.com ,I, $ART $ORATE RTON NEW AWK • SAN FRANOSM Asph, II" MATCH LINEMATCH LINE 1-1.01-13 MATCH LINEMATCH LINE L1.01-C �\J�r11,1 \ � I \ PROJECT ENTRY I I \ 6' HEIGHT PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL, TYP.- I C I MATERIAL PLAN 1"=40'-0" MATCH LINE L1.01-C �__�_ MATCH LINE L1.02-A 0 / C s L1.01-A L1.01-B L1.01-C KEY MAP N.T.S. PROPOSED MULTI -USE TRAIL - 10' WIDE - STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PLANTING AREA CONCRETE PAVING ASPHALT PAVING PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL - 6' or 7' HEIGHT (VARIES PER PLAN), 8" THICKNESS -LIGHT TEXTURED FINISH INSET PERIMETER WALL - 6' or 7' HEIGHT (VARIES PER PLAN), 16" THICKNESS -ACCENT FINISH NOTE: - SUBJECT TO FURTHER DESIGN REFINEMENT AND/OR SUBSTITUTION WITH A COMPARABLE QUALITY MATERIAL MATERIAL PLAN 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax: 212 481 3768 Email : NY@harthowerton.com F'REL M N/ iR'' FL/\N FOR TTM 5gO5E3 FAGS L1.01 993 _M_AT_CH LINE L1.01—C MATCH LINE L1.02—A \ \\\\ v, \ \\ \ A \ v vv v N 1" rS,,A\ SONSULT NC Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landsca Planning . Environmental Services . Dry Utility Go 54200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G22-70 MSAGonsu Itinginc.com I NG pe Architecture ordination . CIS 1 -760.320.G811 �\ I '. \ OES, \\ \ -10 \ v z�� \\\ \ \ \ Off\ ,I, HART $ORATE RTON NEW YCWK • SAN FEANOSM 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax: 212 481 3768 Email : NY@harthowerton.com C 6' HEIGHT PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL, TYP. 6' HEIGHT INSET PERIMETER WALL, TYP. vvv v � v v v \� MATCH LINE L1.02-A MATCH LINE L1.02-13\ ", a "` ` M_AT_CH LINE L1.02—A -- MATCH LINE L1.02-13 \ \ I I I \\ I 1 1 VbC r I \ \ 1 11111 \\\ 1 \ \ III \ \\ 1 \\ 11 m \ I 1 III \ 1 1 11� Z 1 III II ' IIII-� z � I II1 I11 I IIZ n o I III l iI \ I I I m I II IIZ I 1 I1� O I =i � z I I I j I I I O o 0 I III IIT I I I Ilm I ' I I I I M. I I I p I II 1 'I o II b 'I III mI III I i I x L I zI III � I I U)I IIN I I i I � II tl I��II II I I I I a 'TYP II I I I 6' HEIGHT INSET PERIMETER WALL, TYP. i it II II o II F55 nl IIN I I \ m I II I II II \� O MATCH LINE L1.02-13 I I r : _ _ _ _ _ B MATERIAL PLAN 11 40'0" m o MATCH LINE L1.03—A I PROPOSED MULTI -USE TRAIL - 10' WIDE - STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PLANTING AREA CONCRETE PAVING ASPHALT PAVING PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL - 6' or 7' HEIGHT (VARIES PER PLAN), 8" THICKNESS -LIGHT TEXTURED FINISH INSET PERIMETER WALL - 6' or 7' HEIGHT (VARIES PER PLAN), 16" THICKNESS -ACCENT FINISH NOTE: - SUBJECT TO FURTHER DESIGN REFINEMENT AND/OR SUBSTITUTION WITH A COMPARABLE QUALITY MATERIAL MATERIAL PLAN F'REL M N/\Ri' ML/\N FOR TTM 5gO5E3 FAGS L1.02 994 1" r51z�\ /ONSULT NC , ING. Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning . Environmental Services . Dry Utility Goordination . CIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G22-70 1 -760.320.G81I MSAGonsu Itinginc.com ,I, 11ART 110WE RTON NEW AWK • SAN FRANOSM I I � =L___�IL Y i II �I�I O LL � I & HEIGHT INSET PERIMETER WALL, TYP. 1 li � 1 ill l l/ / / /// II II II �11 I I I II MATCH LINE 1-1.03-13' I MATCH LINE L1.04-A HPRIMARY PERIMETER WALL, TYP. MATERIAL PLAN 111=401-011 i MATCH LINE L1.03� MATCH LINE L1.03-B� i O I - f L1.03-A I L1.03-B KEY MAP N.T.S. PROPOSED MULTI -USE TRAIL - 10' WIDE - STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PLANTING AREA CONCRETE PAVING ASPHALT PAVING PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL - 6' or 7' HEIGHT (VARIES PER PLAN), 8" THICKNESS -LIGHT TEXTURED FINISH INSET PERIMETER WALL - 6' or 7' HEIGHT (VARIES PER PLAN), 16" THICKNESS -ACCENT FINISH =r=7L= NOTE: - SUBJECT TO FURTHER DESIGN REFINEMENT AND/OR SUBSTITUTION WITH A COMPARABLE QUALITY MATERIAL MATERIAL PLAN 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax: 212 481 3768 Email : NY@harthowerton.com F'REL M N/ iR'' FL/\N FOR TTM 5gO5E3 FDAGE L1.03 995 & HEIGHT PRIMARY PE WALL, TYP. 1" r51z�\ SONSULT NC , ING. Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning . Environmental Services . Dry Utility Goordination . CIS 54200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G22-70 1 -760.520.G81I MSAGonsu Itinginc.com MATCH LINE L1.03-13 _ MATCH LINE L1.04-A O ,I, HART HOWE RTON NEW YCWK • SAN FEANOSM 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax: 212 481 3768 Email : NY@harthowerton.com PROPOSED MULTI -USE TRAIL - 10' WIDE - STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE PLANTING AREA CONCRETE PAVING ASPHALT PAVING PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL - 6' or 7' HEIGHT (VARIES PER PLAN), 8" THICKNESS -LIGHT TEXTURED FINISH INSET PERIMETER WALL - 6' or 7' HEIGHT (VARIES PER PLAN), 16" THICKNESS -ACCENT FINISH NOTE: - SUBJECT TO FURTHER DESIGN REFINEMENT AND/OR SUBSTITUTION WITH A COMPARABLE QUALITY MATERIAL MATERIAL PLAN F'REL M NAR-' FL/\N FOR TTM 5gO5E3 FAGS L1.04 996 R.O.W. 14' PLANTING 52' R.O.W. irk STREET 0 0 PROPOSED PROPOSED W.4TER SEWER 5' 5' 4' P.A. P.A. MULTI -USE TRAIL 17'-6" MIN L 1?' %-11N. L 17'-6" MIN, CVW D MIN. SETBACK TO TREE C.L. CVWD MIN. SETBACK TO TREE C.L. A I TYPICAL PERIMETER LANDSCAPE & WALL SECTION AT MADISON STREET ,"=,0-01, C I TYPICAL PERIMETER LANDSCAPE & WALL ELEVATION AT AVENUE 58 & 60 , =,o.-o STABILIZED DECOMPOSED GRANITE TRAIL EXISTING GROUND P.L. I I I I I 6' HEIGHT WALE:. VARIES VARIES L 10' 1 L MADISON STREET P.A. 10, P.A. EASEMENT PROPOSED MULTI -USE TRAIL 8' HT. SHEEP BARRIER FENCE GOLF / LANDSCAPE D I TYPICAL PERIMETER SHEEP BARRIER FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE ,"=,0 PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE PAVING PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL WITH LIGHT TEXTURED FINISH NOTE: - SUBJECT TO FURTHER DESIGN REFINEMENT AND/OR SUBSTITUTION WITH A COMPARABLE QUALITY MATERIAL MSS GONSULT NC , ING. Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Goordination • 66 54200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G2270 1 760.320.G811 MSAGonsu Iting inc.com ,I, 11ART 110WE RTON NEW AWK • SAN FIIAANCISM VARIES (400'-500') L DISTANCE TO NEXT B I TYPICAL PERIMETER LANDSCAPE & WALL ELEVATION AT MADISON STREET 8' HT. PBS BARRIER FENCE LOCATION PER PLAN AND AS VERIFIED IN FIELD UNDER SUPERVISION OF ARCHAEOLOGIST AND OR BIOLOGIST. 6' REGIONAL TRAIL NOTE: RESTORED NATIVE TRAIL SURFACED WITH DECOMPOSED GRANITE AND NATIVE FINES - MATERIAL. TRAIL EDGES DEFINED WITH USE OF EXISTING ROCKS. NO NEW PLANTING OR IRRIGATION PROPOSED TO PRESERVE NATIVE AESTHETICS. EXISTING GROUND E I TYPICAL PERIMETER PBS BARRIER FENCE AND REGIONAL TRAIL AT TOE OF MOUNTAIN lir JIM '� _ice ~ _ _ - - � ✓: �,�: .44 i'.•TT'' INSET PERIMETER WALL WITH ACCENT FINISH VARIES (121'-161') L VARIES(400'-5R0') INSET PERIMETER WALL m GOLF DISTANCE TO NEXT 8' HT. STEEL POST & MESH EXISTING GROUND F TYPICAL PERIMETER SHEEP BARRIER FENCE ELEVATION , —,o1-o PERIMETER SHEEP BARRIER FENCE ONE-WAY SHEEP GATE y � - 4 r 'y • a y v -4 3" DEPTH GRAVEL MULCH SIZE: 318" COLOR: COPPER WITH GOLD AND BROWN TONES, TBD SITE SECTIONS & ELEVATIONS PA6E DATE: • 2025 PREL I M I NARY LANDSGAPE PLAN FOR TTM 3c[058 L3.01 997 INSET PERIMETER WALL WITH ACCENT FINISH (NO CAP & PILASTERS) (MAX LENGTH 161' & MIN LENGTH 121') PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL WITH LIGHT TEXTURED FINISH (NO CAP & PILASTERS) (MAX LENGTH 920' & MIN LENGTH 150') INSET WALL VARIES, PER PLAN B TYPICAL INSET WALL ELEVATION T=1'-0" D L3.02 INSET WALL VARIES, PER PLAN DEVELOPMENT SIDE MADISON STREET SIDE D L3.02 INSET PERIMETER WALL WITH ACCENT FINISH (NO CAP & PILASTERS) (MAX LENGTH 161' & MIN LENGTH 121') PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL WITH LIGHT TEXTURED FINISH (NO CAP & PILASTERS) (MAX LENGTH 920' & MIN LENGTH 150') 11 C TYPICAL INSET WALL PLAN T=1'-0" DDIKAADV DGDInnGTGD \A/AI I %A/ITH LIGHT D TYPICAL WALL SECTION 611=11-011 MS/\ T ONSU TIN / I NG . Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Land5cape Architecture Planning , Environmental Services , Dry Utility Goordination . 615 54200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G2270 I-f60.520.9811 I M5AGonau Iting inc.com ,I, HART HOWE RTON NEW YMK • SAN MANC- aTH 150') IKICGT DGDIRAGTGD %A/AI I \A/ITH E TYPICAL INSET WALL SECTION 611=11-011 aTH 121') 6' HEIGHT PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL WITH LIGHT TEXTURED FINISH, TYP. 6' TYP 6' HEIGHT INSET PERIMETER WALL WITH ACCENT FINISH, TYP. SEE ENLARGEMENTS 6' HEIGHT PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL WITH LIGHT TEXTURED FINISH, TYP. PROPOSED MULTI USE TRAIL prim" Is c� H, A TYPICAL PERIMETER INSET WALL ENLARGEMENT 111=40'-011 PRIMARY PERIMETER WALL WITH LIGHT TEXTURED FINISH +�'• INSET PERIMETER WALL WITH ACCENT FINISH NOTE: — SUBJECT TO FURTHER DESIGN REFINEMENT AND/OR SUBSTITUTION WITH A COMPARABLE QUALITY MATERIAL PERIMETER WALL DETAILS PACE SUBMITTAL DATE: AUGUST • PREL M NAR"' LANDSGA E LAB FOR TTM 3ciO5E0 L3.02 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax: 212 481 3768 Email : NY@harthowerton.com SYMBOL PLANT TYPE BOTANICAL / COMMON NAME SIZE SPACING % AREA QTY OTREE ACACIA SMALLII / SWEET ACACIA 36" BOX PER PLAN - - 68 0 TREE CERCIDIUM MICROPHYLLUM / LITTLE LEAF PALO VERDE 36" BOX PER PLAN - - 44 • TREE CERCIDIUM PRAECOX / PALO BREA 36" BOX PER PLAN - - 34 • TREE PROSOPIS X'PHOENIX' / PHOENIX THORNLESS MESQUITE 36" BOX PER PLAN - - 32 OTREE ACACIA ANEURA / MULGA 36" BOX PER PLAN - - 17 A VINE BOUGAINVILLEA X'FLAME' / FLAME BOUGAINVILLEA 5 GAL. 10 O.C. - - 190 a VINE BOUGAINVILLEA X BUTTIANA'ORANGE KING' / ORANGE 5 GAL. 10 O.C. - - 52 KING BOUGAINVILLEA rrrrrrrrrr CELL 1 '-ACCENT - AGAVE MACROACANTHA / BLACK-SPINED AGAVE 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 10% 5,100 SF 650 -ACCENT - ECHINOCACTUS GRUSONII / GOLDEN BARREL CACTUS 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 10% 5,100 SF 650 - ACCENT - DASYLIRION WHEELERI / DESERT SPOON 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 40% 21,000 SF 2700 - GROUNDCOVER - DALEA GREGGII / INDIGO BUSH 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 40% 21,000 SF 2700 CELL 2 -ACCENT - HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA'SANDIA GLOW' / SANDIA 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 30% 10,000 SF 1300 GLOW RED YUCCA ACCENT - HESPERALOE PARVIFLORA DESERT DUSK/ DESERT DUSK 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 30% 10,000 SF 1300 RED YUCCA -ACCENT - AGAVE MACROACANTHA'PABLO'S CHOICE' / SMALL 3 GAL. 3 O.C. 10% 3,300 SF 430 BLACK-SPINED AGAVE GROUNDCOVER - ABRONIA VILLOSA / DESERT SAND VERBENA 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 30% 10,000 SF 1300 CELL 3 -ACCENT - AGAVE GEMINIFLORA / TWI-FLOWERED AGAVE 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 10% 2,000 SF 260 -ACCENT - AGAVE SHARKSKIN / SHARKSKIN AGAVE 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 10% 2,000 SF 260 -ACCENT - POLIOMINTHA MADERENSIS 'LAVENDER SPICE' / MEXICAN 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 40% 8,000 SF 1,000 OREGANO - GROUNDCOVER - LANTANA SELLOWIANA / TRAILING LANTANA 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 40% 8,000 SF 1,000 IIII IIIIIIIII CELL4 - ACCENT - ALOE BARBADENSIS / ALOE VERA 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 80% 15,600 SF 2,000 - SHRUB - JUSTICIA SPICIGERA / MEXICAN HONEYSUCKLE 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 20% 3,900 SF 500 + CELL5 ++++++++++++ -SHRUB - ERICAMERIA LARICIFOLIA/TURPENTINE BUSH 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 60% 3,400 SF 440 ++++++++++++ - ACCENT - AGAVE PARRYI / PARRY'S AGAVE 5 GAL. 3 O.C. 40% 2,300 SF 300 NOTE: - PROVIDE 3" DEPTH GRAVEL MULCH AT ALL PLANTING AREAS. (SIZE: 3/8", COLOR: COPPER WITH GOLD AND BROWN TONES, TBD) - THE OVERALL PROPOSED PALETTE IS COMPLIANT WITH THE SPECIFIC PLAN'S APPROVED PLANT LIST. - ANY PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE DRIP SYSTEM. - THE FINAL LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION PLANS WILL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF LA QUINTA WATER EFFICIENCY ORDINANCE AND COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT'S LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN ORDINANCE. Ill 1" rS/\ GONSU T I NC , NG . � � Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Goordination • CIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA G2270 1 760.320AM I M5,4Gonsu1tinginc.com HART $OWERTON 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax : 212 481 3768 Email : NY@harthowerton.com PLANTING SCHEDULE PA6E SUBKTTAL• PREL I M I NARY LANDSGAPE PLAN FOR TTM 3cf055 L4.00 MSS GONSU T N , ING. Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Arohitecture Plonning • Environmentol Services • Dry Utility Coordination • 615 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G2270 1160.320AbIl I M5AGon5u Itinginc.com ,I, HART $OWERTON NEW YCWK • SAN MAN€ISM 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax: 212 481 3768 Email : NY@harthowerton.com Asph, �- L4.01-A L4.01-B I L4.01-C KEY MAP N.T.S. PLANTING PLAN PAC E • D• • 2025 PREL M NAR-r LANDSC/AFE PLAN FOR TTM 5gO5g L4.01 1000 \� �Xyy\ %;�1 > I _ _M_AT_CH LINE— L4.01-C \° _ \ _ % MATCH LINE L4.02-A i�i�i\ i\ i ♦ \ \ \ \ \ V \ VA AVA viviviivii�ir \ V A \ o A \ \ ,\/yyyy\\\ \ \ \ \VA \ V A vvr�r�/vrv��v''w ♦ � A'V \ \ \ i 10 XXXXI 17, 0 \ \ \ \ aBS, \ \\ \ \ \ \\ \X/\,\/,\/\ \/&00010 \ \ \ \ 1" r51z�\ TONSULT NC Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landsca Planning . Environmental Services . Dry Utility Go 54200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G22-70 MSAGonsu Itinginc.com \ I Ill HART $ORATE RTON G e , , NEW YOW • SAN FRANOSM / VVV... pe Architecture 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 ordination • CIS Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax: 212 481 3768 1 -760.520.agll I Email : NY@harthowerton.com X�i. O \ \ \ \ MATCH LINE L4.02-A MATCH LINE L4.02-B,, I --- iZ,14L — MATCH LINE L4.02-A I' LINE L4.02-B \ \ // \ <\ M,\ 1 I \ \ \ \ / \\0 \ 96 \i3\\ \/\r� I 1 \ \ 1 \I\ II 11 1 I I I I I I �iii�i I I I III II I I I I `�����% I ( I I I I 56 II \ I II I /X I II III I I nl �/"j II Cf) II I v� iI C) I n I I I I rh N z I III � i% II O p I11 I I I ?NI I I :33 I I I I y\�yyy I �yy� I I II \/\�\/\�\� \�\% I I I I I M y\,y\��� ,\\\ MATCH LINE L4.02-B I == I = B PLANTING PLAN 1"-40-0 =� / MATCH LINE L4.03-A I I I I L4.02-A L4.02-B KEY MAP N.T.S. PLANTING PLAN FAGS SUBMITTALD. FREE M NARY LANDSOAME FLAN FOR TTM 5gO5�3 L4.02 1001 1" r51z�\ TONSULT NC Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landsca Planning . Environmental Services . Dry Utility Go 54200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G22-70 MSAGonsu Itinginc.com MATCH LINE L4.02-B)110 MATCH LINEL4.03-A II II'�' I� ► II III // I I I li I I ii � '� i ►lo I II I II I I I II I II I I III / I III I I I I I I r�r�r\r\r I I I i II r %r I I I I I I r\r\r\r \r I C I I 10 I %ZAI o I L I p I 1 ti II a I!I j l I I I I I I II I I I co I I I Cc/ r j j//� g I I� /1 /✓/ cc a rr� l l rri�i�i�i l l r r r�i r�i l l rye rr�r`r l l rr�i�i�i; l NN 571 MATCH LINE L4.03-A / / `S 77 MOH LINE L4.03-B� ,I, HART $ORATE RTON e , , NEW YORK • SAN FRANC SOD pe Architecture ordination . CIS 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax: 212 481 3768 Email : NY@harthowerton.com MATCH LINE L4.03 B MATCH LINE L4.04-A MATCH LINE L4.03-A . MATCH LINE L4.03-13 L4.03-B Fifj PLANTING PLAN FAGS SUBMITTALD. FREE M NAR-' LANDSOAME FLAN FOR TTM 5go5L3 L4.03 1002 _760.320.G811 �)o T ONSULT NC , ING. Givil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning . Environmental Services . Dry Utility Goordination . CIS 54200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, GA G22-70 1 -760.52OPM MSAGonsu Itinginc.com ,I, HART $OWE RTON NEW YCMK • SAN FRANOSM / I I / I I ' I I I I II I I I I / I I I I I I II I II I II I II I II II I II I II I II I II I I �I I� I I I I i� / �L�4.04-A I� I KEY MAP L L4.04-B _ N.T.S. PLANTING PLAN FAGS SUBMITTALD. FREE M NAR-' LANDSOAME FLAN FOR TTM 5go5L3 L4.04 1003 10 East 40th Street, New York, NY 10016 Tel : 212 683 5631 Fax: 212 481 3768 Email : NY@harthowerton.com ATTACHMENT 7 SUBMITTAL DATE AUGUST 28, 2025 1004 PROJECT DESCRIPTION LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROJECT OWNER & CONSULTANTS VICINITY MAP THIS PROJECT WILL ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF A SALES CENTER CONTAINING PORTIONS OF SECTIONS 27 & 28, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN AN OFFICE AND SHOWROOM TO SERVE POTENTIAL BUYERS OF RESIDENTIAL BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. PROJECT OWNER PROJECT ARCHITECT UNITS AT CORAL MOUNTAIN. CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT, LLC. URBATECT DEVELOPMENT 2235 BROADWAY 444 AIRPORT BOULEVARD #109 52ND AVENUE BOULDER, COLORADO 80302 WATSONVILLE, CALIFORNIA 95076 CONTACT: GARRETT SIMON P: (559) 412-8841 w P: (970) 596-6642 w z 0 PROJECT LIGHTING w PROJECT CIVIL NEAL ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING w 54TH AVENUE MSA CONSULTING, INC. 12220 EL CAMINO REAL, SUITE 300 w w 34200 BOB HOPE DRIVE SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92130 w w RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270 P: (760) 942-4240 CITY OF w o COUNTY or zo CONTACT: PAUL DEPALATIS LA QUINTA LU z RIVERSIDE Ln ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS P: (760) 320-9811 z Q 0 AIRPORT BLVD. Ln 0 766-070-012 & 766-070-014 Q �OR�' PROJECT SITE DESIGN & LANDSCAPE HART HOWERTON VICINITY MAP 1 UNION STREET, SUITE 300 N.T.S. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 94111 58TH AVENUE P: (415) 493-2200 SITE CORAL ` — MOUNTAIN 60TH AVENUE AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH SHEET INDEX AVENUE 58 SITE DESIGN LANDSCAPE 2 SALES CENTER KEY MAP 3 SALES CENTER ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN 18 19 SALES CENTER TREE, SHRUB & GROUNDCOVER PLANTING PLAN SALES CENTER PLANTING SCHEDULE + •• 4 SALES CENTER MATERIALS PLAN 5 SALES CENTER SITE PLAN LIGHTING ! - •�• I 6 PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN 7 MADISON STREET PROPOSED STRIPING PLAN 21 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS & LEGEND �' 'j�' l r••* 22 23 LIGHTING SCHEDULE LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM SCHEDULE r ARCHITECTURE 24 PHOTOMETRIC SCHEDULE AND CUTSHEETS •� �,,. '� •� • r ,;♦_� - 9 SALES CENTER FLOOR PLAN 25 LANDSCAPE LIGHTING PLAN '•' � ' 1. ft ..� r �'� �• • �� •� 6 0 v ' • �•;�. } 10 SALES CENTER ROOF PLAN 11 SALES CENTER ELEVATIONS: SHOWROOM 12 SALES CENTER ELEVATIONS: OFFICE 26 LANDSCAPE LIGHTING PLAN: PHOTOMETRIC •�i\ . �.; ; ,� z ,� '', ��� •""• ��,••T� '��►, • 1' �Y. �-; ' I 13 SALES CENTER 3D RENDERING VIEWS k V-1 Ir �• . ' .�,P,! 14 SALES CENTER MATERIALS BOARD 15 SALES CENTER VIEW FROM AVENUE 58 to �!'' • �'' ' t �` 16 SALES CENTER VIEW FROM MADISON STREET • p„ _ • ♦ y • fee e In ;;i•. .•� yjx' • ��� y ��.. 1. 1•• Aove i i• 1 ,'� t w ` fit, . .r r� r•.•• . K:�•�.r ''6 SALES - �.•,��. 't� • �� •� ,.�<:• •' I �'•�.',: -�`� �4 �'s� ��� �.�_ :;,, CENTER Ir off rm •� r • r .16 _ c CA 0 �15 MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com TABLE OF CONTENTS & PROJECT DESCRIPTION CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1005 c�5 MSA CONSULTING. INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com 1006 f � r \� ._ _ _------------� - ----------------------------- AVENUE 58 _ I I I I I 1 I I \ I 1 1' INN ALES - ANDALUSIA i ,, , .L��. � \ •� ' r� -- - -�„ , \\ 1 � ,�-�. ° �., •,�. 1 S •A COUNTRY CLUB CENT R\ 'I A.Ok v. ' • - ANN ` It '` V4 {{/ • \Oslo 0 -'3aft Ii I - l IN \ \ MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com • .'' a �', ; f P G ' 0 200 400 - ' r f •. # 5 r 1 = 200' at 11 "x 17" Ill HART HOWERTON NEW YORK • SAN FRANCISCO SALES CENTER KEY MAP PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: AUGUST 28,2025 CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2 1007 10 Ll MSA CONSU LTI NG, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com I 1 I � 1 1 I 1 1 1 � �I I, 11 '—� Sales Center Parcel Line 1 Office (Trailer on supports) 2 Sales (Trailer on supports) 3 Patio Area with Fire Pit and Seating 4 Shade Structure 5 Driveway (Asphalt, 24' wide) b Future Driveway 7 ADA Access Pathway 8 Parking (Total 9spaces, including 7 AA space) I 4 9 Pedestrian Pathway 10 vehicular Entrance Gate 11 Olive Orchard ' 12 Perimeter wall 13 Emergency Vehicle Turnaround 14 Transformer 0 50 100, 1" = 50' at 11"x 17" III HART HOWERTON NEW YORK • SAN FRANCISCO SALES CENTER ILLUSTRATIVE SITE PLAN PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: AUGUST 28,2025 CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 3 11: Building COMMERCIAL PARCEL \ MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com II II ly II I` 11 I I I 1 m m 1 1 i j 1 1 1 11 1� 1 1 1` 1 Outdoor Terrace (paver) Driveway & Parking Lot (Asphalt) Pedestrian Pathways (concrete paving) Planting Area (see planting plan) DnVehicular Entrance Gate ' Shade Structure Outdoor Fire Pit with Seating (2) Concrete paving .W a W Paver Gravel Mulch Asphalt Vehicular Entrance Gate FYI 0 50 100' 1 " = 50' at 11 "x 17" III HART HOWERTON NEW YORK • SAN FRANCISCO SALES CENTER MATERIALS PLAN PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: AUGUST 28,2025 CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 4 1009 J I\ I I I I I I 4 I( I II I EX. NgqERGROI�ND I I TEL PH NI I I EX. WA4ER MAIN EX. CURB & GUTTER I I \ I I I I I PROP. STRIPED I I LANES ( YP.) I I EX. R/W & PROJECT BOUNDARY i I 1, I I III I I 1 I 1N PROP. 10 FT. LANDSCA E EASEMENT L N 82°12'22" E 138.85111111111111111111111111111 � I I —0 0— O CA EX. GENERAL APLAN :/ZONING: SP 03-067 I I II 9. Q� ACOCEP. SSATED II I I NI I I I I I \ ,�. I I R+ III I ems° R=14.5 \ PROP. PATH TRAVEL OF I ul V D ell - It \ I I I / \ PROP. CRETE PATH N I � I 0 , 7S SHOWROOM Q \ \\ I III I I \ I I I II J PRO .LOT LINE _ � �� v v I 1 I I I I I I � �� OF CE ♦ ♦� I I PROP. 44,* \ 1 1 I I E\ I TRELLIS 44,*� PROP. CURB & 1 EX. RRIER CUR I V I GUTTER \ I 1 1 — \ / ' PROP. �� SHADE S�RUCTURE v v — \ \ \ \ 76d // \ / PROP. LOT LINE 1 ✓ 1 1 \1 1 I I 111 I \ FU BRE BARRIER I 11 EX. E�SEMENT LINE \ \ �X. LOT LANE \ \ �PROP. R/W PROP. LOT LINE & \ \ \ \ WALL \ \ \ \ \ PROP. CURB \ \ \ \ PROP. R/W 100, 766-070-012NT ` \ \ EX. GENERALAPLAN & ZONING: / I I \ \ \ \ \ \ SP 03-067 10, MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com DATA TABLE ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBERS 766-070-012 & 766-070-014 LEGAL DESCRIPTION PORTION OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN. EXISTING ZONING SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067 PROPOSED ZONING SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067 EXISTING GENERAL PLAN LAND USE SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067 PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN LAND USE SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067 SPECIFIC PLAN CORAL MOUNTAIN SPECIFIC PLAN 03-067 LAND USE DESCRIPTION SF PERCENTAGE PROPOSED NET AREA 50,480 SF 100% PROPOSED TOTAL BUILDING AREA - OFFICE TRAILER - SALES TRAILER - - SF PERCENTAGE PROPOSED TOTAL PARKING AREA 1,570 SF 3% ONSITE PARKING DATA SF PARKING RATIO PARKING % COUNT - OFFICE TRAILER - SALES TRAILER 9 SPACES - 100% - 9 SPACES - TOTAL PARKING REQUIRED STANDARD PARKING REQUIRED HANDICAP PARKING REQUIRED - - - - - - - - - 9 SPACES - - TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED STANDARD PARKING PROVIDED HANDICAP PARKING PROVIDED - - - - - - 9 SPACES 8 SPACES 1 SPACE BUILDING SETBACKS MINIMUM PROPOSED FRONT SETBACK 0 FT. 160 FT. SIDE SETBACK 0 FT. 40 FT. -104 FT. REAR SETBACK 0 FT. 48 FT. Uj w w Ln z 0 V) w w w 52ND AVENUE CITY OF LA QUINTA tiO R�� VICINITY MAP N.T.S. 54TH AVENUE w w V) z0 AIRPORT BLVD. 0 Q Or 58TH AVENUE SITE CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB 60TH AVENUE LU w w Of Ln w 0 Of z COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE F- LU w V) N z 0 U Q 0.0:0 SCALE 1"=20' SALES CENTER SITE PLAN CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAG E 5 1010 I L � I I EX. UNgERGROUND TELEPH NE , I I _ I EX. WATER MAIN EX. CURB & GUTTER PROP. FIPED LANESP.) i I I I � EX. R/W & PROJECT BOUNDARY I I 1 I 4 2.15 (FL 4 1.48) \ I PROP. 10 FT. LANDSCAPE EASEMENT I ( 4 17 I ♦ I I � I r — JI I _ PROP. ADA PATH OF3RAVEL % ,� 766-070-014 _ — — — T 45 Z VACANT // \\ E.X.' GENERAL PLAN & // 0 �� \\�/f� i♦ 2.0�, / I 3 ZONING: / \\ _�/ �♦ / ' v SP 03-067 ' \ / 453� O \ / �PROP. GATED / / �, II O ' I / / l ♦ ACCESS p & �► <\ TP 453. \ \ / \ 1 --453 _ - \ l I 01 _ 11 TP4 3.2 PROP. CONCRETE PATH TP 2. \\ \ \�4 S— / / / \\ ♦ \ / l\ \\ o i 1 i T' 452.7 PROP. ADA PATH I I I \ \ I 1 \ \ l PROP. LOT LINE / RETENTION / OF TRAVEL ,•fir \ I I \ AREA / / /SALES TRAILER TP 454.0 � \ \ Asp / �' / / / ♦ °I° oe OFF}CE j ♦ I TP 453.5 \ \ \\ \ } y I 1 R1LER i PROP. ♦ \ \ stS) \ \ \, 1 r (/� TRELLIS — I /I ' 0 \� / \ P 452.7 P P. I EX. C/L —453 TP 45 0 11 / 2.0% 0\ J� PR P. CUR I EX. BARRIER CURB \ GU ER 1 PROP. o AWNING \ _ SHADE \ \ \ \ \ STRUCTURE// \ \ \ \ FL 53.6 / / / /7 TP PROP. LOT LINE \ , 1 //TP 453.0 TP 452.8 / EX. EASEMENT \ t /y to ! II I - / LINE FL 4 0.01 EX. LOT LINE �/ — 452— — — / / I I 4 /—— / X /'RETENTION AREA / 1 TP452.9\ FL452.8 \ \ \ \ PROPI LOT LINE & \ \ PROP. R/W \ \ � PROP. CURB PROP. R/W � , r 1000, PROP. GATED ACCESS FG 456.1 \ 766-070-01 2 \\ \ ~!! I t VACANT EX \GENERAL PLAN & \ \` \ \ ZONING: S1k,,03-067 MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com ZE dpr� t OR 0' 20' 40' 60' 80' SCALE 1 "=20' PRELIMINARY GRADING PLAN PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: AUGUST 28,2025 CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 6 1011 41 / 41 41 / / //% o //41 / 41 /41 41 /moo j / Ole / / / / 'IN/ / / /41, / / 41 4P� / 41, \\\N\ / \/ off/ / / ��� / �\\ / / /gyp //� p� 4110 ,per G' / ❑ / � 0 / i� 40 p /�i per' 40-01 \ i \ y \ y$ \ i i 9' 411 ✓ \ � per/ / ❑ / / yy \\ / ❑ / by \ v \ / � h / yh i 6h i / / i i i 1 / i i i i i EX. R/W & PROJECT / BOUNDARY / / woo / / / / 000000 / 00 '' FUTURE CU i000 PRov�MEN(S) 000 / .00 �''/ 23� �VRN _MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com 00 titk PROP. CURB PROP. 10 FT. LANDSCAPE EASEMENT— — — — — — — — — — — — — �PROP. LOT LINE ------- _ PROP. LOT LINE _- --- --- EX. CURB &GUTTER O _— — _ PROP. SALES — _ -- __ ,�c�• CENTER ENTRY— _ PROP. STRIPED LANES (TYP.) _ 1T1T11 STREET F— EX. BARRIER CURB MADISON 01 30, 0•0 SCALE 1"=30' MADISON STREET PROPOSED STRIPING PLAN CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAG E 7 1012 1-i"-lN >< MEIDL.JLnFk 1013 19 GENERAL NOTES 1. KEYNOTES ARE SPECIFIC TO THE DRAWING SECTION IN WHICH THEY RESIDE. ALPHABETICAL PREFIXES IDENTIFY DRAWING APPLICABILITY. 2. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF FINISH (F.O.F.), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 3. DO NOT SCALE FROM DRAWINGS. 4. ANY INCONSISTENCIES OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS TO BE REVIEWED BY THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCEEDING WITH CONSTRUCTION. 5. GRID REFERENCES AND DIMENSIONS ARE INDICATED FOR REFERENCE ONLY. VERIFY ALL ACTUAL LOCATIONS IN THE FIELD. 6. REFER TO FINISH SCHEDULES FOR INTERIOR FINISHES 7. PARTITION TYPES WHEN REFERENCED ON FLOOR PLANS ARE WALL TYPE ASSEMBLIES - SEE DETAILS S. SPOT ELEVATIONS NOTED ARE FOR REFERENCE ONLY AND ARE CONSISTENT ACROSS ENTIRE FLOOR PLATE UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. FIELD VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NOTIFY ARCHITECT IN CASE OF DISCREPANCY. 9. BUILDING DOORS AND WINDOWS ARE NUMBERED BY TYPE OR INDIVIDUAL UNIT AND SCHEDULED SEPARATELY. ADD ROUGH OPENING AS REQUIRED PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. VERIFY ALL WINDOW AND DOORS ACTUAL FRAME SIZES WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S SHOP ORDER. KEYNOTES - FLOOR PLAN 01 FINISH FLOOR IS ONE INCH DEPTH MAXIMUM 02 TANKLESS HOT WATER HEATER (IN CABINET) 03 ENTRY DOOR - ADA THRESHOLD 04 S.S. SINK, WASH BOARD 05 ADA GRAB BARS 06 NOT USED 07 REFRIGERATOR BY OCCUPANT 08 CASEWORK STORAGE BY OCCUPANT- PROVIDE ELECTRICAL 09 SPLIT SYSTEM HVAC - AIR CONDITIONING 10 ADA SINK 11 IN -WALL TANK CARRIER & FLUSH AND WALL HUNG TOILET 12 NOT USED 13 PROVIDE WALL OUTLET FOR CABINET 14 EXHAUST VENT BATHROOM 15 PLUMBING PIPES & VENTS 16 HVAC CONDENSOR NOTE ON DIMS: WRITTEN DIMENSIONS ON THESE DRAWINGS OVERRIDE INTERPRETED DIMENSIONS SCALED WITH A RULER. CONTRACTORS SHALL VERIFY AND BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL DIMENSIONS AND CONDITIONS ON THE PROJECT AND SHALL NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IN WRITING OF ANY DISCREPANCIES FROM DIMENSIONS OF PROPOSED CONDITIONS SHOWN BY THESE DRAWINGS. NOTE ON SHOP DWGS: "SHOP' FABRICATION DRAWINGS AND PERTINENT SUBMITTAL INFORMATION SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT AND ENGINEER AND OWNER AS APPLICABLE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH PURCHASING, FABRICATION AND INSTALLATION OF PROJECT ELEMENTS. CONTRACTORS ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR FIELD VERIFICATION AND INSTALL DIMENSIONS AND CALLING FOR 3RD PARTY INSPECTIONS IF REQUIRED. HCD APPROVAL - MANUFACTURER REGISTRATION #1590434 [-'F1N->C MEIDL InFl-k 1 G 10 v QO N * 'v C-28486 m 7/31/2027 ARCHITECT REGENARCH 612 W. LODI AVENUE I SUITE 101 #44 LODI, CA 95240-3563 c:209.310.8363 I richard@regenarch.com RICHARD G. HOFMEISTER, NCARB I CA LIC. NO, C-28486 MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering - Land Surveying - Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services - Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com 201j 1 1.1 T2.3 3 3.4 4 4-- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 40•- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - -,- - 1 /4" l I 9'-2 3/4" 31-4" 6'-8" 3'-8" 6'-4" 9'-5" 17 1 I I I I II FF&E BY CLIENT - ROUGH -IN I FF&E BY CLIENTI- ROUGH -IN 0 " 0 11 li I BY COMMERCIAL MODULAR i BY COMMERCIAL MODULAR 2'-3j 1 -11 1 -8 I 3"SS 2"GW I I " I I N I II C Sill 4'-6 r 0 4' 2' HOSE BIBB HWH TANKLESS IN WALL RECESS 24x24 FLUSH ACCESS PANEL 1/2" 5 CW A-20 (B)_ � --- — 30"x24"x12 UPPER CABINET wl — DUPLEX POWER OUTLET & DATA FOR TV AND DESK BY CLIENT ELECT 5 -20 }--r,ADA SILL II/ I II II II II VA D01 2314 CM—AINP—IAAC—BITO—YVE uII 1 I _, _ L ----I-____--__1 /;I IIILI o== 000JIlIlIl III ------- I n n I I 12x12FLUSH AC— CESS PANEL (high) II r 1 -6y 1--- ---3-----'1 / ' 2'----.. 1 -V" - --- ' --- 2' --- --- 2' I I II i= \ I " 1 „ 9' \ 1 5'-9„ 3 1 �.= OPEN OFFICE 1 it 7'-6" \ I I 14'-9" r-LEAR T A: P35 sq ft 1 SINGLE TOILET 1 O C: B 3 1 — — — A_ 5a #t I B EAK ROOM 8� E RESS 7" I I n \ ► occ: B (� r - 1 I \ A: 105 sq ft OCC: B 1 ; I � I I RECESSED I ,_ " 8 81/2 BOX QUAD + o FLOOR OUTLET I - — - — - — - — - -- - - — - — - TV OUTLET _ - -- COPIER � IT 1 ELECT D02 O I I 9'-101/4" I c- (RECESSED`-" WALL BOX ) I I IN WALL RECESS 24x36 FLUSH AC ESS - OUTLET +24" I ; PANEL FOR LOW VOLT EQUIP I I FINISH WALLS BY CM TO LEV L 3 GWB NO PAINT - CLIENT & i OPEN OFFICE 2, INSTALLER TO FINISH WALLS TO LEVEL 5 GWB SEAMS m �i 0 OFFICE A. 90 S 'ft I I , � A: 73 sq ft I I , 1" BUILT UP FINISH FLOORIBY CLIENT & INSTAL ER (ON- -2 in OCC: B 1 1 1 �C'C'' B 1 1 1 i SITE) - CM TO PROVIDE SMQOTH CONTAINER FLOOR (1-1/8" < Qi rn1 v ti I I I SOLID BLOCKING CEILING & WALL MARINE GR DE PLYWOOD) J FOR SCREEN WALLS BY CLIENT I I 12'-2 3/4" 9" 8'-2 1/2" 15'-31/4" Sill 3'-9" i i Sill $'-9" I i i Sill '-9" c6 6'-6" I 1 III L�---------------'-------------------- - - - - - ' 0 0 1 1.1 2 2.3 3 3.4 010 20 n 11 n n n _2O n 2"C liI I 9 1/4" FF&E BY CLIENT - ROUGH -IN BY COMMERCIAL MODULAR 1121 30"x24"x12" UPPER CABINET w/ DUPLEX POWER OUTLET HOSE HWH TANKLESS IN WALL RECESS BIBB 2424 FLUSH ACCESS PANEL - I e= �I 2' cn I I I I '-4 1 /2" 1 7-1 1 /4" 10 ,A-20Q I M 00 �r 0 4 14 r— 563 sq ft ' I - -� 4.9 5 FLOOR PLAN SCALE:3/8" = 1'-0" - FLOOR PLAN 13 SCALE 3r'H" = 1 -0" Q r WE 0 2' 4' 6' -2oa) SALES CENTER FLOOR PLAN CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN rz PAG E 9 1014 KEYNOTES - ROOF PLAN RP-01 METAL ROOFING PANELS RP-02 METAL GUTTER & DOWNSPOUT EACH END The conexmodular 'slant roof' is using a GIBRALTAR panel SM-RIB (Black)- <https://www.homedepot.com/p/Gibraltar-Building-Products-12-ft-SM-Rib- Galvalume-Steel-29-Gauge-Roof-Siding-Panel-in-Slate-987637/314709089> And fire rating requires the versashield underlayment: <https://www.homedepot.com/pep/GAF-VersaShield-350-sq-ft-Fire-Resistant- Roofing-Underlayment-Roll-0904000/206560036?mtc=SEM-CM-CM L-GGL-D22-022_ 010 ROOFING-NA-NA-NA-DSA-5718363-NA-NA-NA-NBR-NA-NA-NEW- Feed_DSA&cm_mmc=SEM-CM-CML-GGL-D22-022_010_ ROOFING-NA-NA-NA-DSA- 5718363-NA-NA-NA-NBR-NA-NA-NEW-Feed DSA-16190675935-135851696320- 1817207280367&qad_source=1& brq aid= 0AAAAADg61Uf0LKo_vPiZOga6WRVQR0a4q&gclid=CiwKCAiwwgfABhBcEiwAZJiC3seJ AFpEltel7- bG9FgWGZIrUNEZL4God_Clzlml7DRp8d_x5TgskhoCNnoQAvD_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds> On 15/32 Plywood Roof Sheathing: <https://www.hoinedepot.com/p/l5-32-in-x-4-ft- x-8-ft-Sheathing-Plywood-Actual-0-438-in-x-48-in-x-96-in-20159/206827282> For Class A Fire Rating standard: UL fire listing TGFU.R20735 - Roofing System, which is linked to Southeastern Metals Manufacturing (Semco), our facility in Jacksonville Florida DR G. Hop cy%� N * v C-28486 m c 7/31/2027 \,9J� EXf'. UC � ARCHITECT REGENARCH 612 W. LODI AVENUE I SUITE 101 #44 LODI, CA 95240-3563 c:209.310.8363 I richard@regenarch.com RICHARD G. HOFMEISTER, NCARB I CA LIC. NO. C-28486 _MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning - Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination - GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com 5 A.1 - 1 1 /2" 1.1 2.3 19 -20 3 In 1 1/2" I I i ' z LJI ' � - - - - - - - - z o 6 - o - I r - -I�- - - - - ' � I I ' I ILL IT, 0 0 /-Z 033 3.8 4.9 5 ROOF PLAN 1 SCALE:3/8" cm V-0" 4.9 0 2' 4' 6' � - B.9 7 ---- B -20 Zo ROOF PLAN 13 SCALE:3/8' _ 0 i -I Ej E) LJ L R SALES CENTER ROOF PLAN CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAG E c 1015 l METAL ROOF BLACK STO FINE TEXTURE 20 SE ELEVATION SALES CENTER SCALE:3/8" = V-0" METAL TRIM BLACK Champagne v 69 93330 RG EI: 225,215,200 0 2' 4' 6' J BONDERIZED METAL 'STO' CHAMPAGNE ANDERSEN WINDOWS MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering " Land Surveying - Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com 1 x4 CEDAR SOFFIT Recessed Ceiling Light - COORDINATE RECESSED LIGHTING IN CONEX OVERHANG ROOF BEGA LIGHTING MODEL: 24801 SQUARE DOWNLIGHT OR SIMILAR EVENLY SPACED COLOR: BRONZE WRINKLE 2700 K OR 3000K PORCH LIGHT SW ELEVATION SALES CENTER 7 f SCALE:3/8" = V-0" 0 2' 4' 6' NW ELEVATION SALES CENTER crai G• l;R„ - V_w NE ELEVATION SALES CENTER C5SCALE:3/8" = 1'-0" 0 2' 4' D ARC' G. OF (D * v C-28486 m c d 7/31/2027 ARCHITECT REGENARCH 612 W. LODI AVENUE I SUITE 101 *44 LODI, CA 95240-3563 c:209.310.8363 I richard@regenarch.com RICHARD G. HOWEISTER, NCARB I CA LIC. NO. C-28486 I-IEjl)L-JL(-\ rz SALES CENTER ELEVATIONS: SHOWROOM CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAG E 11 1016 l I I .v vnw I I I I 1 i I I (] SW ELEVATION DESIGN CENTER 19 SCALE:3/8" = 1'-U' C 2' 61 i METAL ROOF BLACK STO FINE TEXTURE METAL TRIM BLACK Champagne i:in 69 93330 RG B: 225,215,200 BONDERIZED METAL 'STO' CHAMPAGNE ANDERSEN WINDOWS MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering - Land Surveying - Landscape Architecture Planning - Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination - GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com 1 x4 CEDAR SOFFIT Recessed Ceiling Light 0. - COORDINATE RECESSED LIGHTING IN CONEX OVERHANG ROOF BEGA LIGHTING MODEL: 24801 SQUARE DOWNLIGHT OR SIMILAR - EVENLY SPACED - COLOR: BRONZE WRINKLE 2700 K OR 3000K PORCH LIGHT NW ELEVATION DESIGN CENTER / SCALE:3/8" = V-0" 0 2• 1, 61 NE ELEVATION DESIGN CENTER 10 SCALE:3/8" = T-0" 0 2• 1, I;• SE ELEVATION DESIGN CENTER 5 SCALE:3/8" = V-0" Ca G. H R�y��� N * C-28486 m 7/31/2027 �Q- ARCHITECT REGENARCH 612 W. LODI AVENUE I SUITE 101 *44 LODI, CA 95240-3563 c:209.310.8363 I richard@regenarch.com RICHARD G. HOFMEISTER, NCARB I CA LIC. NO. C-28486 I -IEjl)LUL� rz SALES CENTER ELEVATIONS: OFFICE CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAG E 12 1017 OFFICE BUILDING: VIEW LOOKING SOUTH - <=30E=>-G OFFICE BUILDING: VIEW LOOKING NORTH MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com SHOWROOM BUILDING: VIEW LOOKING SOUTH WEST SHOWROOM BUILDING: VIEW LOOKING NORTH EAST [-ON i �CjC)LJL rZ SALES CENTER 3D RENDERING VIEWS PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: AUGUST 28,2025 CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 13 1018 METAL ROOF BLACK ���frn�.r!'!:L;a.Yslil-`lti�1r!?.�+.'��r�'f_'�j'fS.��:s �►R!�'�3�-1rTY"fT��f!e!'�,s;s'.�•?c!!n�l.'3"1LL� ;�,�•$.'.�"f.1�.r,•.t '�415x'�-,�"`x'�:�'.ty,J.? �z'r.±,�i A, ';!�,�i"�"%'F'� a ,- a STO FINE TEXTURE MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering - Land Surveying - Landscape Architecture Planning - Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination - GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com METAL TRIM BLACK champagne RGB: 225,215,200 BONDERIZED METAL 'STO' CHAMPAGNE ANDERSEN WINDOWS 1x4 CEDAR SOFFIT Recessed Ceiling Light - COORDINATE RECESSED LIGHTING IN CONEX OVERHANG ROOF - BEGA LIGHTING - MODEL: 24801 SQUARE DOWNLIGHT OR SIMILAR - EVENLY SPACED - COLOR: BRONZE WRINKLE - 2700 K OR 3000K PORCH LIGHT FE- E=N->C I'liDUL R SALES CENTER MATERIALS BOARD CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAG E 14 1019 ` 'r Nk I m4�6' A— -"a- -*— OWL mmff�- _MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com t SUBMITTAL DATE: AUGUST 28,202.21 CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN AVENUE 58 SALES 1 v e+ CENTER tP • »2 O LA apw 0 IN �t I 4 � r ilk 4 _ -h „�,•.�,�,. .�..x sal ,:1 "..- .` A'- - .. _.. _ I• �_ • • _ �. ` - \ �' f '!' X . i ^ _ III HART HOWERTON NEW YORK • SAN FRANCISCO SALES CENTER VIEW FROM AVENUE 58 I PAGE 15 1020 AVENUE 58 SALES s 1 CENTER ♦ d 42 # Z PR a! _• ICE,, � .l\ � , ; `- �� - - ' � ~', .•� 1 ` � � � � '`i�� 1 yam_ _ r�� ' _ i- � \ � - � . ����e��` �:i�_ ��--�»+�[� rs�[v � � ,f•!. �+.�a..�s R'`�►.= i'- WL - _ - � � �" - .. - - — i - .� �,ti. _ - i` - - 1 -, �, • � � ,� � • _ q■�� � -/ _��. - :' t _ - ;fir t _`0 t `� -y' �.: `► _ _ - - t _ _�`' Z :• . _ -� — r` 1 �y, , n a. TJ„I it r t n , �`� • t \i . r+.�*�`� r�,S .--! `1'. i-• 'V ` i S' a •,• ;``' `_-� ' �' S -. �� �_ ..nV _ , Il `' (r•'" 4 • dr•`�! t j s - ;�'- �' ,; J S-.' / tr j6". r� .p _ •Y•,� i' :,+ �.:. t. .', } 1 ` ��-.�. ea. ,�'�+i:-•.34 Ir •r 'w: �ti ca a�,'f - :� ',�%:' Ei�.a.'y11' i..'1 ,.��{; +i . it -.. >�3.\' = 1 • = .p �y� - -7. t -�•. � '{ ail. I`.F -L �}, ,i���'•�'i %• � .%i _ .�1. J �'} �a �k •.P ':n #r:': T / •� •iY r s7�` '- _ e� 5 r �?�.r' j ,. i•J 1^ . .. cf - _ ;:'r4 R. _ �S' .i �:9 iJ.�F�, .h t,. �'•t�: .rt J •a. .i'. i E .»J.�',' z. .�; r. r`��,( _ 4 _ �'. t' .a. ' r•. •c `4 - '\ (( i �•"�• .'°�'.1;'��. /�; ;� w� :P 1 ,��+'LI•`i '�I�1�,i�`� J,.. -l�� _.� - 'v �v• .. `�'.*f, I _ _�-� -_ --.�_. •' �~` � _Ar. r. tib� ". ,' • a"fir--xr '^^ O`�GCi.' •_:'•. - .•v;' )) •.?.`� -• �"- J •. ...5� - - • s •. y. .,c�_ 6 'BSc •: .•� .a. ;3' {u :I - _ - • "►• ;,�_ - •{f. C" 1:>*i . J ec. _ .^tly ,yti. -'., r - -i ",',� ,tat . •I �," J_' Xakw e'�,*. cr _ i• , r r. ''�` �F".,^ .r-i'. - - - - • _ _ .fit•• 4 v _ �+ - - 11�y.j+..�.sue. •Y•. 'd' `� "sue- �'.n L�L �(.!, 'ar T:'•,.�.+a 'r_ -j�. �i. J-`�-s-�ii� - _.,? 1i2-j'.�'1 =l•`,; •' ti .r��` - j• 'a �i"»a' �'.��+� mac:►' '�`' �`\='+��i!: aL -,` = - .ems '� _ _. _ � T - -' - - - _ _ - - - - �-�-� �.•, i��� _ y , _ e 4Y � A � — uih _MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com , 14 -�7 IL `���•�-�� -.may r LM'•r�T ~ , III HART HOWERTON NEW YORK • SAN FRANCISCO SALES CENTER VIEW FROM MADISON STREET PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: AUGUST 28,2025 CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 16 1021 HART HOWERTON NEW vo Rx.snNFrenNcisco 1022 COMMERCIAL PARCEL Tree Plan MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering - Land Surveying - Landscape Architecture Planning - Environmental Services - Dry Utility Coordination - GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com II I I � II I I ti II 'I � II II I I III III I 1 II � III I D I i D -saw I COMMERCIAL PARCEL Ilz z m I I m glow J ONO 0 Now 9L saw 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 # 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ', 1 0 0 0 0 0 l 0 ' `' ' \ 0 \ 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 1z m ce 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Shrub & Groundcover Plan I- ....... 1-1 ...... ...... I--.-]--.,.,-. ... I 0 50 100, 1 50' at 11"x 17" 111 HART HOWERTON I I NEW YORK - SAN FRANCISCO SALES CENTER TREE, SHRUB & GPOUNDCOVEP PLANTING PLAN PAGE SUBMITTAL D. AUGUST 28,2025 18 CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 1023 Sales Center Planting Schedule Symbol Plant Type Botanical Name / Common Name Size Spacing % Area QTY Trees Tree Olea europaea L. /Ancient Olive Tree 96" box Per Plan - - 3 Tree Olea europaea "Manzanillo'/ Manzanillo olive Tree 48" box Per Plan - - 5 Tree Olea europaea 'Manzanillo'/ Manzanillo olive Tree 36" box Per Plan - - 73 Shrubs & Groundcovers Cell A Shrub Ericameria laricifolia /Turpentine Bush 5 gal. 3'-0" 100% 11200 SF 150 Cell B Accent Accent Muhlenbergia dubia / Pine Muhly Agave 'Sharkskin`/ Sharkskin Agave 5 gal. 5 gal. 2'-0" 3'-0" 80% 20% 51000 SF 11200 SF 1440 150 Cell C Shrub Leucophyllum laevigatum Summer Snow/ Summer Snow 5 gal. 3'-0" 100% 1,600 SF 200 Cell D Accent Accent HesperaloeX'MSti/ NIvorySwam'Mite Lights/Swan Nite Red Yucca ,agave macroacantha 'Pablo's Choice' / Small Black-spined Agave 5 gal. 3'-0/1 2'-0" 70% 30% 600 SF 250 SF 80 70 Cell E Accent Accent Muhlenbergia 'Pink Flamingo'/ Pink Flamingo Muhl Agave parryi / Parry's Agave 5 gal. 2'-0" 3'-0" 70% 30% 11800 SF 800 SF 520 100 Cell F Groundcover Groundcover Baileya multiradiata /Desert Marigold50% Abronia villosa / Desert Sand Verbena Seed Mix - 50% 211200 SF - Raked Gravel : Size: 3/8" , Color: Copper with Gold & Brown Tones, TBD Notes: . The overall proposed planting palette is compliant with the Specific Plan's approved plant list. . Any proposed irrigation system will be drip system. . The final landscape &irrigation plans will comply with the City of La Quinta water &efficiency ordinance and Coachella Valley water district's landscaping and irrigation system design ordinance. MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com III HART HOWERTON NEW YORK • SAN FRANCISCO SALES CENTER PLANTING SCHEDULE CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAG E 19 1024 NEAL ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING SAN DIEGO, CA 760.942.4240 1025 LEGEND LIGHTING SPECIFICATIONS AND GENERAL REQUIREMENTS GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES • ALL LOCAL AND NATIONAL BUILDING CODES AND REGULATIONS SHALL GOVERN AND BE APPLIED TO ALL THE WORK REQUIRED TO COMPLETE THE DOCUMENTED LIGHTING DESIGN, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE NEC. • IT IS THE GENERAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR'S/ELECTRICAL ENGINEER'S RESPONSIBILITY TO ENSURE THAT THE COMPLETE INSTALLATION IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL CODES, INCLUDING ITEMS SUCH AS BUT NOT LIMITED TO GFCI AND AFCI LIGHTING CIRCUITS, THE GROUNDING OF ALL FIXTURES AND PROPER VOLTAGE DROP CALCULATIONS. • BOTH THE GENERAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS SHALL FIELD VERIFY AND COORDINATE THE LOCATIONS OF ALL LIGHTING FIXTURES AND DETAILS WITH ALL DISCIPLINES PRIOR TO ROUGH -IN AND PURCHASE OF ANY FIXTURES. • ANY CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE LIGHTING DESIGN AND ALL OTHER DISCIPLINES INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO FRAMING, STRUCTURAL, HVAC AND PLUMBING SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND COORDINATED WITH THE ARCHITECT, RNLD AND THE CONFLICTING DISCIPLINE. • THE GENERAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LIGHT FIXTURE MOUNTING/INSTALLATION REQUIREMENTS LOCATED IN MILLWORK WITH THE MILLWORK CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE CONCEALMENT OF LIGHTING SOURCES AND CONDUCTORS AS REQUIRED. • THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR PROVIDE AND SIZE ALL REMOTE LOW VOLTAGE TRANSFORMERS AND POWER SOURCES AS REQUIRED PER THE SPECIFIED MANUFACTURERS INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. • THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL CABLE POWER FEEDS AND CONNECTORS FOR LINEAR LED SYSTEMS AS REQUIRED PER THE SPECIFIED MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS. ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS • ANY CONFUSION AND/OR DISCREPANCIES WITH THE SPECIFIED CATALOG NUMBERS WHEN ORDERING THE FIXTURES SHALL BE REVIEWED WITH RNLD PRIOR TO COMPLETING THE ORDER. • EXACT FINISHES OF DOWN LIGHT TRIMS AND REFLECTORS, PUCK LIGHT TRIMS, STEP LIGHT FACEPLATES, GLASS ELEMENTS, METAL COMPONENTS AND ALL OTHER VISIBLE FIXTURE ELEMENTS SHALL BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE ARCHITECT, INTERIOR DESIGNER, AND THE CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO FINAL SPECIFICATION AND PURCHASING. • RNLD RECOMMENDS THAT ALL DOWN LIGHT TRIM RINGS BE PAINTED TO MATCH THE CEILING FINISH. IN CEILING CONDITIONS WITH WOOD OR PATTERNED FINISH, THE FAUX PAINTING SHOULD BE COMPLETED AFTER THE CUSTOM FINAL AIM AND FOCUS OF THE LIGHT FIXTURES. DECORATIVE LIGHTING FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS • ALL DECORATIVE FIXTURE SIZES AND WEIGHTS TO BE COORDINATED WITH THE GENERAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS TO ENSURE THAT PROPER BLOCKING IS IN PLACE TO SUPPORT AND MOUNT THE FIXTURES. • ALL DECORATIVE FIXTURES TO BE DIMMABLE. SUBMITTALS AND SUBSTITUTIONS • THE ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE LIGHTING FIXTURE SUBMITTALS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY RNLD. • ALL SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY RNLD SHALL BE ADHERED TO BY ALL PARTIES AND MAY NOT BE SUBSTITUTED FOR ANY REASON WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL. • IN ANY CASE REQUIRING A CHANGE TO THE LIGHTING FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS AND/OR A SUBSTITUTION, ALL INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO RNLD FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO PURCHASE. • RNLD SHALL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY UNAPPROVED SUBSTITUTIONS AND/OR CHANGES TO THE LIGHTING PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, CONTROL LOAD SCHEDULES, AND PROGRAMMING THAT ARE MADE WITHOUT THE APPROPRIATE APPROVALS. • IN THE CASE OF A DISCREPANCY, THE FIXTURE DESCRIPTION LISTED ON THE FIXTURE SCHEDULE SHALL TAKE PRECEDENT OVER ANY APPROVED SUBMITTAL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com S SINGLE POLE SWITCH - DIVA STYLE SWITCH. VERIFY COLOR. S SINGLE POLE SWITCH - LETTER INDICATES SWITCH LEG. DIVA STYLE SWITCH. a VERIFY COLOR. IF PRESENT, ARROW INDICATES DIRECTION OF AIMING FOR 3 Sa SINGLE POLE 3-WAY SWITCH - LETTER INDICATES ADJUSTABLE LIGHT FIXTURE. SWITCH LEG. DIVA STYLE SWITCH. VERIFY COLOR. SD DIMMER SWITCH. DIVA STYLE SWITCH. VERIFY COLOR. LIGHT FIXTURE SYMBOL a --------_-� S3D 3-WAY DIMMER SWITCH. DIVA STYLE SWITCH. VERIFY COLOR. Fm a SM MOTION SENSOR SWITCH. DIVA STYLE SWITCH. VERIFY COLOR. � LIGHT FIXTURE TYPE DESIGNATION a FOO _ __ KEYPAD LIGHTING CONTROL STATION. VERIFY CONFIGURATION. ■ 0 CEILING MOUNTED MOTION SENSOR. OCCUPANCY OR VACANCY PER CODE. L Z LIGHT FIXTURE CONTROL ZONE ® LUTRON RECESED 1/2 HOT FLOOR BOX RECEPTACLE WITH FLUSH STAINLESS STEEL COVER. o LUTRON 1/2 HOT DUPLEX RECEPTACLE. LIGHTING PLAN FIXTURE LOCATIONS AND DIMENSIONS • ALL INTEGRATED LIGHTING IN THE MILLWORK AND OTHER DETAILS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE ARCHITECT AND INTERIOR DESIGNER. ANY AND ALL SHOP DRAWINGS THAT RELATE TO LOCATIONS WHERE LIGHTING IS TO BE INTEGRATED SHALL BE PROVIDED TO RNLD FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT. • GENERAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS TO REFER TO EXACT DIMENSIONING AND CENTERLINES INDICATED ON THE LIGHTING PLANS PRIOR TO FRAMING AND COORDINATE ALL FIXTURE LOCATIONS WITH FRAMING, AS BUILT CONDITIONS AND ALL OTHER DISCIPLINES INCLUDING HVAC PLUMBING AND AN TO AVOID CONFLICTS. ANY REQUIRED CHANGES SHALL BE REVIEWED BY RNLD. LIGHTING CONTROL DEVICES • ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ORDERING THE PROPER SWITCHES AS SPECIFIED DEPENDANT ON LOAD TYPE, WATTAGE, MULTIPLE WAY SWITCHING AND DIMMING, AND DE -RATING FOR MULTIPLE GANGING OF SWITCHES AS DETERMINED BY THE MANUFACTURER. • ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO GANG MULTIPLE SWITCHES AND WIRE ALL MULTIPLE WAY SWITCHES AND DIMMERS AS INDICATED ON PLAN. • EXACT LOCATIONS FOR ALL SWITCHES TO BE VERIFIED WITH ARCHITECT, INTERIOR DESIGNER AND CLIENT PRIOR TO ROUGH -IN. RNLD RECOMMENDS THAT STANDARD SWITCHES BE MOUNTED AT 48" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR TO THE CENTERLINE OF SWITCH EXCEPT AT SPECIAL LOCATIONS. • EXACT FINISHES FOR ALL STANDARD LIGHTING TOGGLE AND DIMMING SWITCHES AND THEIR ASSOCIATED FACEPLATES TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ARCHITECT, INTERIOR DESIGNER, CLIENTS AND/OR CLIENT REPRESENTATIVE. LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL A LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM AS PRESCRIBED BY THE CLIENTS. RNLD SHALL NOT SPECIFY ANY COMPONENTS OF CONTROL SYSTEM OTHER THAN CONTROL ZONES. SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXACT QUANTITY, LOCATION, CONFIGURATION AND MOUNTING HEIGHTS FOR ALL LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM KEYPADS. SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY FINISH AND COLOR OF ALL KEYPADS WITH ARCHITECT AND INTERIOR DESIGNER. SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY MANUFACTURER'S CERTIFICATION TO INSTALL THE SPECIFIED LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM, AND REGISTER FOR TRAINING IF NOT ALREADY CERTIFIED. SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR TO ENSURE THAT ALL PROPER WIRING IS IN PLACE FOR COMMUNICATION BETWEEN MULTIPLE ENCLOSURE LOCATIONS. SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE THE ENTIRE LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM WITH THE AN CONSULTANT, MEP AND ARCHITECT TO DETERMINE EXACT LOCATIONS FOR ALL ENCLOSURES, MAIN CCU AND COMMUNICATION BETWEEN ALL SYSTEMS. • SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY CONFIGURATION OF ALL CONTROL DEVICES WITH OWNER. • SYSTEMS CONTRACTOR TO BE AVAILABLE DURING BOTH DAYTIME AND NIGHTTIME HOURS TO PROGRAM FINAL LIGHT LEVELS AS PRESCRIBED BY RNLD. CUSTOM FINAL ADJUSTMENTS, ON SITE AIMING AND FINAL FOCUS • ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR IS TO PROVIDE NEW LAMPS FOR ALL LIGHTING FIXTURES AS SPECIFIED BY RNLD DURING THE TRIM OUT OF ALL FIXTURES. • ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR TO PRE -AIM ALL LIGHT FIXTURES AS INDICATED ON LIGHTING PLANS BY RNLD. • RNLD SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE GENERAL AND ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS TO SCHEDULE A FINAL AIM AND FOCUS DURING NIGHT TIME HOURS AFTER ALL ART WORK AND FURNISHINGS ARE IN PLACE, AT WHICH TIME ADDITIONAL MATERIALS SUCH AS LAMPS, SCAFFOLDING, LADDERS AND ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL MAY BE REQUIRED TO ADJUST FIXTURES. GENERAL RE CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER NEAL ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING SA.N DIEGO, CA 760.942.4240 UIREMENTS &LEGEND PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: AUGUST 28,2025 � SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 21 1026 LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE c�5 MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.98111 MSAConsultinginc.com TYPE SYMBOL IMAGE VOLTS WATTS DIMMING CCT OPTICS RATING FINISH DESCRIPTION MANUFACTURER CATALOG NUMBER ELV F3. 120-227 13W 3000K 50° DRY WHITE 1.9" ROUND SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER WITH DEEP REGRESSED LENSE AND NARROW FLOOD OPTICS LUCIFER LIGHTING CYOX-FB-1-BK-WH-90S-13D-30-50-4 -1TR-SMK3 2% ELV F3.2 J 120-227 13W - 3000K 350 DRY WHITE 1.9" ROUND SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER WITH DEEP REGRESSED LENSE AND SPOT OPTICS LUCIFER LIGHTING CYOX-FB-1-BK-WH-90S-13D-30-35-4 -1TR-SMK3 2% F3.3 J 120-227 13W ELV 3000K 500 DRY WHITE 1.9" ROUND ADJUSTABLE SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER WITH DEEP REGRESSED LENSE AND NARROW FLOOD OPTICS MILLWORK MOUNTED LED TAPE LIGHT IN ALUMINUM CHANNEL MILLWORK MOUNTED LED TAPE LIGHT IN ANGLED ALUMINUM CHANNEL LUCIFER LIGHTING CYOX-AS-1-BK-WH-90S-13D-30-50-4 -1TR-SMK3 TH1SW- 1.5-30-DRY-STD-DF-[VERIFY QTL CONNECTIONS]-M4-ST-[VERIFY LENGTHS] TILT-OI-SW-1.0-30-DRY-FR-[VERIFY QTL CONNECTIONS]-SST-BK-[VERIFY LENGTHS] 2% F6. . 8 �o. 24 1.5W ELV 3000K __ DRY SATIN 2% F6.2 - 44" .�•� - 24 1W ELV 3000K -- DRY BLACK 2% ELV F6.3 • 120-227 2W 3000K 300 DRY BLACK SURFACE MOUNTED TO MILLWORK 1.5" ROUND PIN SPOT MP LIGHTING L51-2W-W30H-N-NA-BA 2% DECORATIVE FLOOR LAMP BY INTERIOR DESIGNER D L D L 4 DECORATIVE DESK LAMP BY INTERIOR DESIGNER DECORATIVE WALL MOUNTED VANITY LIGHT BY INTERIOR DESIGNER D L D L DECORATIVE SUSPENDED FIXTURE BY INTERIOR DESIGNER DECORATIVE SURFACE MOUNTED FIXTURES BY INTERIOR DESIGNER D L D L DECORATIVE TASK LIGHTS ELV EXTRA DARK L2. 12 8W 3000K 60° WET BRONZE LIVING STAKE MOUNTED 3" ROUND LED UPLIGHT WITH 60 DEGREE GLARE SHIELD AURORALIGHT DIR16064-3008-BLPX-60 DEGREE OPTICS 2% PATINA -- L3. 120V 11W 0-10V 3000K WET DARK BRONZE 30" TALL BOLLARD WITH ASYMMETRIC OPTIC HESS LIGHTING LN760S-S-30K-DIM-UNV-DB LS. 40° WET BLACK POWDER COAT 2.5" ROUND CATENARY MOUNTED LED PENDANT DOWNLIGHT WITH PERFORATED METAL SHADE HK LIGHTING ZX16-CAT-SOI-P-12V-SM16-07-36D- 930-03-12V-BK-[MOUNTING] 12 9W ELV 3000K 10% ELV L5.2 120/277 10.4W 3000K -- WET BLACK 4" SQUARE RECESSED DOWNLIGHT WITH SYMMETRIC NARROW BEAM BEGA B24801-K3-BLK . 2% NEAL ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING SA.N DIEGO, CA 760.942.4240 LIGHTING SCHEDULE CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAG E 22 1027 MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com LIGHTING LF/ AREA CONOfROL FIXTURE TYPE DIMMING FIXTURE DESCRIPTION TYPE QTY WATTAGE PER TOTAL LOAD EA SALES CENTER INTERIOR MAIN AREA SC1 F3.2 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER 0-10V 2 EA 13 26 MAIN AREA SC1 F3.1 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER 0-10V 2 EA 13 26 MAIN AREA SC1 F3.3 ADJUSTABLE CYLINDER 0-10V 1 EA 13 13 MAIN AREA SC2 F6.1 LINEAR LED IN TOEKICK 0-10V 29 LF 1.5 43.5 MAIN AREA SC2 F6.2 LINEAR LED IN SHELVES 0-10V 45 LF 1 45 MAIN AREA SC3 F6.3 MILLWORK MOUNTED PIN LIGHT 0-10V 3 EA 2 6 SWITCHING MAIN AREA DL DECORATIVE DESK LAMP AT FIXTURE 1 EA 60_ 60 COMFORT STATION CS1 F3.1 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER_ 0-10V 1 EA 13 13 COMFORT STATION CS2 F6.2 LINEAR LED UNDER CABINET 0-10V 13 LF 1 13 RESTROOM RR1 F3.1 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER 0-10V 1 EA 13 13 RESTROOM RR1 F3.2 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER ELV 1 EA 13 13 RESTROOM RR1 DL DECORATIVE SCONCE ELV 1 EA 60 60 DESIGN CENTER INTERIOR WORK AREA WA1 F3.1 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER ELV 4 EA 13 52 WORK AREA WA1 F3.3 ADJUSTABLE CYLINDER ELV 1 EA 13 13 WORK AREA WA2 F6.1 LINEAR LED IN TOEKICK ELV 13.5 LF 1.5 20.25 WORK AREA WA2 F6.2 LINEAR LED IN SHELVES ELV 24 LF 1 24 WORK AREA WA3 DL DECORATIVE PENDANT ELV 1 EA 60 60 WORK AREA WA3 F3.1 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER ELV 2 EA 13 26 BREAK AREA BA1 F3.3 ADJUSTABLE CYLINDER ELV 2 EA 13 26 BREAK AREA BA1 F3.1 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER ELV 1 EA 13 13 BREAK AREA BA1 F3.2 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER ELV 1 EA 13 13 BREAK AREA BA2 F6.2 LINEAR LED UNDER CABINET ELV 8 LF 1 8 RESTROOM RRl F3.1 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER ELV 1 EA 13 13 RESTROOM RR1 F3.2 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER ELV 1 EA 13 13 RESTROOM RR1 DL DECORATIVE SCONCE ELV 1 EA 60 60 OPEN OFFICE 001 F3.1 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER ELV 2 EA 13 26 OPEN OFFICE 001 DL DECORATIVE FLUSHMOUNT ELV 1 60 60 SWITCHING OPEN OFFICE DL DECORATIVE DESK LAMP AT FIXTURE 4 EA 60 240 OFFICE OF1 F3.2 SURFACE MOUNTED CYLINDER 0-10V 4 EA 13 52 SWITCHING OFFICE DL DECORATIVE DESK LAMP AT FIXTURE 4 EA 60 240 EXTERIOR ENTRY EX1 L2.1 LANDSCAPE UPLIGHT ELV 10 EA 8 80 PARKING LOT EX2 L3.1A BOLLARD ELV 12 EA 29 348 SIDEWALK EX3 L3.113 BOLLARD ELV 9 EA 14 126 PLAZA EX4 L3.113 BOLLARD ELV 8 EA 14 112 PLAZA EX5 L2.1 LANDSCAPE UPLIGHT ELV 6 EA 8 48 PLAZA EX6 L5.1 CATENARY PENDANT ELV 13 EA 9 117 PLAZA EX7 L5.2 SQUARE DOWNLIGHT ELV 5 EA 10.4 52 PLAZA EX8 L5.2 SQUARE DOWNLIGHT ELV 4 EA 10.4 41.6 _ 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Page 1 NEAL ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING SAN DIEGO, CA 760942A240 LIGHTING CONTROL SYSTEM SCHEDULE CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAG E 23 1028 V H KUSALighting Group Rejm NNw nkblle" ZX16-CAT-S0i-P/ZX16-CAT-GUIO-SOi-P ©(, ■ Catenary . ZXI6 sores �J Product Features •AwnfgW [MeN7•yNa, l.kdkq FED AY- ::!.=a4NU--U5 p1enMTnr,me,AM• umhlrllq wnymMlaNe.pww r.NeM �x.k,.nr. tiad.•numm+,.,h•..a+l,ms uuldwr nr hriax i.lrlYMLklln Awurcal ..mar,nun I .. MYAo, r,.n . nm%n..Inw so7Nr.'k'p p,wapa P,e •Pwfft.-hoadalba.ubeelghlaeawnd r1mbwd Ardn wM,n ,.daYq FlawlmnawalM lhr in tntlasnbUa Town tight ac.lan4 •Inleprr wn 1tlnpmd wirl,q mmperlrnmtln Ana I,od/. • FTL uadwr win IauURn INN¢ Itl5 norsl[ni • AL[hlnM lnmra4l blNet6MI�TA cvm.lon n4Hal ruMnum • 0.10 •lb palemed.AwI10V1210hehh GUI ,,,,••, • 1Nwltl, WS.1 a t1pV(lLef wMfrUta tr[bl • CAl ID501lea'naedam IN pgwuakh 1[tt.ry. Specification tli,Mk M.U.NawnMMNAI Tewmmwnmmam LaIM aaaaNs. IN war G:fiJ P.6 r+ Uptla11N Ostia, AAttnak. n.rr•° m'. ak.wan ore fa Raatt nw I,auwre M+bnY ,n .wp.In se,w aa>s....a snam9 IOYflnn.nlw. rY+Iwlpa Mw.uA,:wPwl. rk,�,,,,�1NNr• Haan �INIMe [pannDd,+Wn,man bpwa+6w fbw.WtlRcnta Ywan 41. d[IYvwnne tak,11, ar wen Ativau P"..r' llqq R)IV.h� MRte dimmw .r.uebl.Y Y.•u Ynn I! at"A caw km Ian Rau nrr a .Ao PI,. - ' ` �W LL rlwwr,q Alnwn n>• Y„.ry ul Rr Y men nr Y- P uwr+Moto auv annww Maur,dn bxnl.YD: _ u+1-brWMMnta:n MSCAAA•Ae,>drnwr,owM.wtY mtb�ape-NRN WIpsOMa•UDYmP Naw,derm ,�, wr '. Wv 4ramR.NMbn. - "v rlwrcaN akrw0lYr nr7\nw..,w. oN Ydhps N. 1r 11wK MN NAn.h.,•am• •n..+ru,w...°u r.+.r.wynu. ,Iw II:N-� S1M'ukN eaun'DnwMw Ion �.v �I I.n,YYwn A.orra •..r n nor u.. ,p„n,e,M1 . mp,w,r wANnpa Nis.VM[+sCaAAMlalrgwnl�InwmYlnan. =ram nbN•nl bra nodN.PpaNw wan n,uWd mo w.,m .rw:. nrr�r�YPiwrwl w. rap orderingGulde a EXAMPLE: VWCAT501PIN 00917 89-Df-TVRN9WX1[ aML mus olar[ckmNas nl:Uh�A.¢Ist.m [Y�KaamP .Ana rer..r.nw IN roue rN y. is It uCac nntnJ u upaa $� K Mar wl tA,wv,a. '...'as tam wr.ar,L,a,A� o�nwn.eaaaaaNrra Product Drawings apR t +.a.wr.�.wrorw•.rrY.a a,kpvepa aYleeaa.aal IA is I. a o srkA.n.r. racearao HN 'AA L19hWQ Cw 3519 01,1 Cn l An I al It '.rwEUN risk CA 4111t Ti Los "0 441 TV Ai 4W .all 1r 143 kligh IN eu MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering - Land Surveying a Landscape Architecture Planning a Environmental Services a Dry Utility Coordination e GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com AURORAI_IGHT TELLURIDE DIR160164 It. INhJlde, U. Ilagslnp dlr.Counel fl AWuaN,tid, utilizes o.x'rterdiangeable LED ModWo caged to - n all bass body This urwpn prrrndes .4-,. heat etsslpation crlWal for long lite and Nql performance -Scam Drain'system to e,pal din, dust S water N+tactwngs able lig •ht -1.10 f .Virg Ooe LIED- .3 ntkrntangeann PUMA doyhc opucs fiom 20° to Sir -ideal for trees. large greenery, arcNlerlure a Wade CONFIGURATOR: Ile HafiH oa»emaa n •.r.. �,a. tzAxl ns«en r»w� ,P�rpr, 1 =lA+reYea RLN aesaugy Pmnt rznzz.ox lzr ARMse.pw lAs • aaemtPkR (soeal?'10at IRA taow lEeerrpF .n..F DrMEN5404S Lt TFRSIe I?rmM• I13M SOHACF mNN[.WaLID kbd.,e I:CLDR'LMPERAWALS »011{•a99w -TACES R.M- M ,AN eoa VOITAOE »Y DEthimED LUMENS aMN le Im OaAMrE Mae M+Ifs WIAetRIY DMYIFA w..TN east tM,Mea Qn.ea iRAIlrOIIBEIB t1VAEACa.a.f a.wat .0ton TaA era+almrw MMa OROIRID STAKE TaAlRaaa MaNtltA ACCESSORIES Ya. YYatlaaratarw OPTICS RMIAN kaA N.wx is ear 4rhaYtt[Ww aaa MArIBMAI Lraw WINE LENDTN W LOCATTON evw �t CERTIFICATIONS QLN"MO ti myM. vrrrrl wK seas Y[aC wwa,wOalNa V�raP% e .Pro saT.9pto n. nn taw Aa w r�rrd CA s9aro w w Hw 111100 ear. soRAA vivid" A'VA -ABLE F N'HE' IMlIIIIIl . 0 ■ 6 NAT BLP 111.1E eaevw oral. .ev1ra =t.,np n,w wc•r.v. SIIl ate. east f4M o-rT pawn sas.n C IZ. Ip• twM MME IN'JSA 1 DE U5 reea>ee.1NJ5 1-,.t IISIFB Beam Angle 10°, 2F. 31 � 5 Color Te TiPeratime 2700K 3000K 4CCiOK . Color M wil CIE M.Trica: CRI 95, R995 TM30 Met,= R195. Rg 1017 Whiteness Index. Rw 100 �+ Applicat cii How[& & Hofpltfity Galled" & M.wtms High -End Retail SONAA VIVO" So,— VNID lamps of lu bcaut Aul ,xd act uaW -;o,, and wrote radern,g wade the e,it- vMble sp-Imm, ­rkmg th. na,rral rang, of aMllyht tnd.lA unm,+rhed qu:Yky of light for color crkical nippicatiom, POINT SOURCE OPTICS' S.".. aptcs delta_ a ptl ..l beam qualky with a sp shadows, pealed Inlannty and p--ly c Udled beam dittributione horn 10'. 36°. SOMA^ VIVID COLOR' Soraa VNID lamps utHas ful spectrum light w prw,d. ndustry4iid mg co -or rimdheon of CRIN5, R9N5, 111095, Rp/ID01or Freda c 1l mprodul:tion. SORAA NATURAL WHITE' Srxat VIVID L mFs are• erg neaed to d.lwar outstandY,g whnrnAss rrndc*ng for trot-to-hk whkes, ,Yhid1 nlati nr anr+rada mra,dar:I, .auras It Z700K and 30ODK. ENERGY EFFICIENCY BS%motor ,energy eff.,i-t than nandard h.Tngnn lamps, w.th typical payback of orw yea or lee. GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS Form Factor Operating Temp.r.Wr. Wdlh'. 50.1mm 0.97'I Mrwnum•40'C(iwatried) Height 45.5mm(119') Typical. 85'C-90+C(bast) Weigh, 479 MA--. 9(rC E,ae) SMt6 ).SW VMp 21 Ot THERMAL COMPATIBILITY S.:ruLlu b, use., h,lh o 1d d Mtuws,sugecl I,' h­-s -k temp>rahAle Im,4 staled+, 1ha data M,e..l -ably tu•r dream s, h,rf tampr.U,r....maren I w J �.Y„ 9anems. ELE TIi COMPAnwirry Wu�4s wid, vatting edge .x+d Veedlny edy. phase art di �: .:�:, t2V AC �ja9netk: and electror< trarulmners and 1ZV DC tranA(cmkrs Check mdvdu.l lamp webana Pagn fn+ I.— Fm:,l Wity dwa. Fp more:nlormation unit smw.sulua.cu. INTENDED USE & LOCATION RATING h.tensled k+r Mks MRIa cortpatbe receas.d downiiyl,[s, bat'. high 'ng ad otha+ indoor and outdoor applicitun.. Sonabk rdsnpI c tiona, not rsted Ionise:, wetix9nons TIs. a¢n p,e>dJm water inn 2mWh:m o(UV Iqr• and is.,me^iM.>•+y hx high atv and wFYa, daa Iag Applool s, 4-hthe'. 1-0,• , .- {trrcl r. aekh aro optd brKhuo,sg agerts in ikrnnated dye LIFETIME & WARRANTY f611,4ltinw bs L70. 35)000,n Warrarryi 3yre or 25,0001n w-Plch- court N» F- w+,rpnty inlom,.W. v�94: www.YAaa.C•xn/r.9DUme>Ib,:., ACCESSORIES h:.,,vn ;pal <rxrpafble wkh Hna $a as $NAP $ysten:- p®fl ROHS FCC C E d' Ebctrical Dimming Wattage: 7.SW aI.-H,fe,.... our oomp.HbAt, chart is d,mma as --- Power factor 0.92 InformaHu'. Voltage: 12Y ./-1.2V rrequency: bW6Otr Mbrm>+IPn anti rpeaauto,I[..n1a1 x rveye DINER S h ess Illumi Iating Ballard . DESCRIPTION The Merrier prorteal LNEA canpemems contemporary afchf cure with well mapatlaled tying ally a modem firm The fabnrsw aluminum bolas a wanable as a shrgla ar im mourn iminate R three dMerem heights c, neetsMMng scale reaulrements. The July shielded klminate snits zero uptight. Cancaaled mounting mMMi1 es the Ibayrinl NI hadmre Is slumNss stein I• PRIMRR' '•\:' #e®ry ,Hti. _ IyW .Yn:Ttl.n b, ORDERING INFORMATION IINaUE1 CONFR NUM OLT CaNTROt VDLTAEe _.H arm Lis- It 3R MIY JAL n 9mrlew o[N - . Y p.n,.lp aOTiln w k rm9YMiatl ,c'u,.aw•9Ma BwIrnAmv ;N76 � D •A.s wB Dlewllralw >r P spsm9fdaN ta�oa n Mar raps A Da P Has `I I rPe^Y x av fn9msml avt Gn GG ore rx owmw .w <n.wrannartw..m.M zawcY rataarn,NY..-aIWIMrIa rn 7semanrao.wmr.ym aanla :NLa0 76miOS-Nor :.,w711I,i c, G'^awY,:l ores lm+,pY r.rore EXPERIENCE: Fywkw:ar,eeao.w.pmawat.p,.,.+.w,waAw. V4 ..-n�.....:,.. ..n. -.., .n •.,, »e,.,•.wr...,,.mu,.,...nnwruvm...Iw. .r." w.mrwl Square downlight � Narrow beam ApplLaat W, Roomsal­1r:9.,mirtireearnerm[ndnc,w - teem 4y11 dePlW.bn Tea pawM,l fJs 101Q 1481$EGA Wl.. UPIu_YO IUsIIo uPasVdr: •aMcla aolrtl the re t" .ne Ta rum a oomph vole, atlAps. The vmw, Mi... pdvmu'TI All wrh opf. ewe ImmY -ft a,mnRlry Glad: Aa ann atia m.unou7ly ehis p.auww dreh Luton C4. s "aw alak 9Ae. IAblro 9,a'1a mnoa her C I3W oogan, miii n.I4.•,UO.O Rkm,nlm actin slrmn IIp{NM mncely 1. m Mena, yaemn Vat.,n AY gar=dude awhan swriessa capllw r Ar,r...IaIrelw,wa Ah,m a Meal eprew -lod d BEGA Fn : Op maunitd drrror ter BEGA vlTla aortae Rlw aro,Bted eunm,Fn MlaIXal W �eln NRTL 11.10 W North Amard.n Slareanan, W tatty. f. wort lotwluw plot.don oe.a IP e6 Yaal9ht: 1 orb BeatHeal Gin- wNoeo 12C-30 C AC LEDh ioR sAtt."alu:e 84W L®mpaw kwr.D. a 4,w B/Ylrrt AllteB• -IOV CufmlNbary FE. wwRAC. w1 RYamm.bq Odor radtrlr9 YItlaA Fa> VO urMnta brRro 0DCD) I..0 tsMUIM (L701 &XriOne LEU ts9brbnparaNaa In3rx era o:,DO( At3ry - 30.',M fr31 i 2zDLK dr271 BBOA ran [IaAtY ydl wM alteh,a I m mrMtarrnl m.l - 1, ,. , r� yews eFlarlMVucraW of LEOIUIt,blaAeeo rrtb.I i. Finish NI BEGA Illadird Ana,. ore malt, t t.W oow iv, I.- n,-vn✓n 3 MI "wwssa F iGA L.ftk+•aa anlal, aorldet.umncr We p,uepllVl r Bbtk Bea¢., a,a Sr- BEGA alrtdrd Milli a. W- durabb pokiest., puwda. ionYy Wb Co waiRAL Aid D,ai Wa ""i Dm ,Jad �r ether .1,oa,a pawdar or Y1dd P.M. AYMNDIa _,.. C � In+LOnnl LDl NBh OM�M�j c nor D CUS: Type: BEGA Product: Proles'. MtydAi AYabbb nplbn> rsc rwrq 7 7 Hal RAJ V ads ulYYlmel AI RRN Man Ittath _� w Ir A V. 16.- 2i'._ BNA TTwO,MMw yONA Wft CA Nap (aD )M.09SB Walgrw.mm iaaglladnm a�'a,kpw."n'r'w,eab'a'•"d.rr,a,MrYa.eetw Y.w•rue..n•-.r.rinem+r..u..•. vr..u,:.•�a,.r.,rmrr w,.eM� LIGHT FIXTURE SCHEDULE # Name Parameter Min Max Average Mean/Min Max/Min 1 PARKING LOT AND Perpendicular 0.003 fc 1.19 fc 0.083 fc 26.15 378.2 DRIVEWAY illuminance 2 SIDEWALK Perpendicular 0.001 fc 1.08 fc 0.13 fc - - illuminance 3 WALKWAY Perpendicular 0.066 fc 1.06 fc 0.48 fc 7.29 16.07 illuminance 4 PLAZA Perpendicular 0.11 fc 18.7 fc 2.56 fc 23.54 171.8 illuminance NEAL ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING SAN DIEGO. CA 760.942.4240 PHOTOMETRIC SCHEDULE & CUTSH EETS CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER I SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN PAG E 24 1029 a D L2.1 L2.1 EX5 EX5 MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com L2.1 EX5 a L2.1 ' Ex5 L2" A 0 EX5 �J -1 EX5 -' L3.1 EL ii EX4 L2.1 a EX5 L2.1 \ EX5 O L3.1 EXI 111.3.1 L2.1 a ,, EX5 L2.1 2 / / EX5 L3.1 B /�"" • �� EX4 .. L3.1 B EX4 1 / EX& 4 1 E �L5.2 �*EXB . I � • X& \ L5.2 L2.1 F-X8 EX5 �. L2.1 . / EX5 \ L5.1 �EX6 L5.1 Now ISO Saor low b L2.1 EX5 a L2.1 EX5 low low O � b L2.1 a L3.1 A EX5 Ex2 \ L2.1 EX5 D L3.1 A r 0E p L2.1 EX5 a L2.1 EX5 L2.1 p EXI 4 L2.1 L2.1 p EXI VON goo gas O C 4 L2.1 ' EXI L2.1 1 �_ EX5 a _ EXI 4L3.1A L2.1 i Ex2 EX5 0 -*L3.1 A Ex2 V L2.1 , EX5 a L2.1 EX5 , 4L3.1 A , Ex2 , b L2.1 EX5 a L2.1 -4L3.1 A EX5 ---- kv#-- \ \EX2 4 iI L2.1 C EX5 EX5 b , L2.1 1 EX5 L2.1 EX5 GENERAL NOTES: - DECORATIVE FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS, LOCATIONS, AND MOUNTING DETAILS ARE PER ARCHITECT OR INTERIOR DESIGNER. KEYNOTES: OTREE UPLIGHTING TO BE AIMED AND COORDINATED WITH TREE LOCATION ON SITE. 2 DOWN LIGHT RECESSED INTO OVERHANG. COORDINATE LOCATION AND HEIGHT. O3 WALL MOUNTED DOWN LIGHT. MOUNTING HEIGHT PER ARCHITECT OR INTERIOR DESIGNER. NEAL ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING SA.N DIEGO, CA 760.942.4240 LANDSCAPE LIGHTING PLAN PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: AUGUST 28,2025 CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 25 1030 wo ISO OW low low I low Now owa "IN I---- - r 4o --- 2 r� \ L21 O L2.1 . EX5 4 C 1, L2.1 E L2.1 I EX5 EX5 p +❑. ❑'11 /i L2.1 _.� � � I �-4 1 \ EX5 +❑. ❑38 +❑. D22 +a. D� L2.1 O b +❑ . 0'1'I EXI -- p L2.1 \ 1 L2.1 L3.1A EX5 p ' EX5 L2.1 +❑.0'1'I +0.'17 EX2 E25 +❑. ❑24 +❑. ❑❑9 E2 5 ' to. 0oEi Q �, \ L2.1 O 11-3.1A EXI ' EX2 b 'L2.1 +❑. ❑'17 +❑. ❑'15 +❑. ❑OB .030 +❑. 29 +❑. 23 +❑. 05❑ +❑. ❑23 +0. ❑'1-1 - EX5 L Q L2.1 EX5 L2.1 _ ' O +D.'17 EXI +D.'1'1 +D. 0-15 +0. .'13 +0. 067 +❑. ❑'16 +❑. ❑'19 +0. 045 O / L3.1 b p EX4 L2.1 L2.1 EXI q L2.1 L ` EX5 L2.1 L2.1 b EXI EX5 +0. 25 +0. 0'13 EXI /' +D. 032 +0. ❑'14 +0. ❑29 +0. 039 1 L3.1 B EX4 +0. 035 +o. 04'1 +0.009 +❑. ❑09 +❑. 0'I8 +❑. 0'I8 +❑. 025 EXI� f L3.1 EX5 p +❑. ❑'I8 +0. 008 +❑. ❑'1❑ +❑. D34 EX L2.1 L2.1 - EX5 b EXI 0.028 3 ' L3.1 ❑.❑29 0.0❑6 ❑ D2❑ L2.1 ❑.32 3.1I EX5 p EX4 + + + EXI i} 4L A L2.1 Al 4 EX5 Q ' 0 D87 \\ EX2 EX5 C C v LT.1 + +�. ❑2 - 2 / EX5 . .15 � � 1 O / L5.2. 1 EX7 .1B +❑. ❑'I'I +❑. 0'12 +❑. ❑'I'I +0. 02❑ +❑. 065 \ +❑. 26 EX4 ( � v _ � � 4L3.1 A � / EX2 L2.1 p EX5 , +2. ❑e +❑. 72�'�3 - L21 �� L2.1 - 5.2 `V1. c2 p +0.'I8 +❑. ❑40 +❑. ❑-12 +❑.0'19 +❑.'I'1 Ex5 EX5 c'ex& L3.1 B L2.1 , EX4 +D. 45 EX5 -*L3.1A r +❑ . '14 +8.29 +0.42 + 5E L3.1 A EX2 EX2 +❑.'13 +❑. 029 +❑. ❑ '1 +❑. 023 +❑. L2.1 p I EX6 • �;' EX5 L2.1 �L5.2 L5.�1 +❑. ❑70 �v EX5 / *EX5 +❑. 69 �* . ❑9 +'I. [ r^ I' U 4L3.1A EX 5 p L3.1A +❑. ❑B3 +❑. ❑'IB +0. 010 .032 �' y,0. 4 X2 / 1 L2.1 EX2 , EXb EX5 [l+S. BB +0.'13 +3.9'1 +0.29 2 .1� +❑. ❑57 +❑. ❑'12 +D. 9 L2.1 Q� Vx6 L3.1 A EX5 j EX2 / E21 I \ 1 + +❑.25 +2.46 L2.1 , O /, j \ ' EX5 L2.1 O / 0.70 b EX5 L2.1 , a 1> L2.1 L3.1A EX5 . L2.1 L2.1 45.1 p EX2 1 EX5 EX5 +❑.3'1 EXb+D.59 EX5/ EX5 1 L2.1 L5.1 \ EX5 L5.1 O C� L2.1 Y +1. 6 +0.25 O / / EX5 p 121 b L2.1 p EX5 L2.1 EX5 0 MSA CONSULTING, INC. Civil Engineering • Land Surveying • Landscape Architecture Planning • Environmental Services • Dry Utility Coordination • GIS 34200 Bob Hope Drive Rancho Mirage, CA 92270 1760.320.9811 I MSAConsultinginc.com NEAL ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING SA.N DIEGO, CA 760.942.5240 LANDSCAPE LIGHTING PLAN: PHOTOMETRIC PAGE SUBMITTAL DATE: AUGUST 28,2025 CORAL MOUNTAIN: SALES CENTER SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN 26 1031 ATTACHMENT 8 PUBLIC COMMENT PH1 CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB 1032 Cheri Flores From: Mary Mann <maryhpmann@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2025 8:22 AM To: Tania Flores Cc: Cheri Flores; Consulting Planner; Planning WebMail Subject: Re: Coral Mountain Documents EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. You don't often get email from maryhpmann@gmail.com. Learn why this is important Cheri, Thanks for speaking with meat the CC meeting yesterday. I have started a list of questions regarding the Tract Map and development permit applications, so this can be considered communication on the scheduled Hearing on October 28. Sending to you as a start of my questions and comments on these applications. Tract map Note 6: Refers to lot Y- as having an easement for a trail. Lot Y on the map is on the northern side of the property, so may be mislabeled, supposed to refer to lot "Al"? Considering that is the case please explain where the trail would go. The line of the fence as shown would require the trail either outside of the fence or over the rocky area. (this is further shown in site development permit, which is not clarifying). This the fence line and trail directly impacts a Unique Geologic Feature, Cultural and Historical resources that are currently visited by 10s-100 visitors a week. This was not considered in the underlying EIR. Further Environmental Assessment is needed to determine a way for intended development to proceed while respecting the existing environment and many community resources it provides. What is meant by Environmentally Sensitive areas noted in tract map and documents? What led to this definition and why is it only defined for the small areas shown, when the conditions along the entire toe of slope are similar including bat and bird nesting grounds, unique geologic features and archaeological artifacts? Is there a planning document that explains what considerations would be made during construction and ongoing use within and adjacent to these areas that was submitted with the application? CVWD above ground water conveyance infrastructure at about the marking for "AH" on the 1st page of tract map is not particularly noted, since this is a public water supply, how will this infrastructure remain accessible for maintenance and monitoring, safety throughway in disasters, and availability of our water supply? It does not seem to be considered at all here or in the underlying EIR. This is a concern for Safety and the security of our water supply. Has applicant supplied any dues diligence plans, agreements negotiations with CVWD to show that the concerns and requirements provided in EIR and development agreement are being met regarding existing infrastructure, as well as the requested new ells to be drilled and water conservation and recycling measures to be implemented? Please make these available for viewing 1033 One of the TCR Mitigation measures in Dev. Agreement required a Rock Art Management Plan, where can I find this, who has reviewed? Also what is the status of recordation of the Environmentally Sensitive Areas. Have these sites been nominated to the National Register of Historic Places as also stated under mitigation measures. Because the rock art will be directly impacted by the implementation of the proposed maps and development plan this will need to be vetted and implemented prior to any disturbance. Was a traffic plan included with this application? It is unclear how the different egress and access points to the development will be, please clarify. It seems imprudent not to have access from Avenue 58. Given that the property on the NW is designated a park and has the current public access to the public Lands why is there not an access point from the development onto these lands. This will surely be a desire of future residents of that development and would make sense for future build out. This should be Looked into further to have better alignment with the City General Plan and spirit of agreements with City, DRD and other agencies. From the detail map Sheet 3 on west site where the proposed fence runs NS, there housing lots somewhat set back from the proposed fence lineare adjacent will there be an additional interior wall, if so what is the purpose/need of the fence at this location? How will the current access road from 58th along this line be treated? Is this part of the park? More details are needed to determine if this is appropriate to be approved. Referring the triangle 9 on tract map- ingress and egress easement how will this be maintained what will boundary be between existing (walled) development (erroneously marked vacant on map) and lots Z, X and Y and boundary? Says will incorporate the neighbor wall, will there be a gate to allow ingress and egress? This is a safety concern and homeowners access issue. What improvements are planned for the end of Ave. 60? Do they take into account concerns of current residents, users of the area and the new neighborhood going in now on the corner of 60/Mad? A symbol for different types of gates are given on page 24 of the Golf course site development plan. I do not see their actual locations on the map, please clarify the locations and what the gates would be for. Is there a back up document that explains what these gates are for and how they will be used? Thanks, Mary Mary Mann, La Quinta Resident 775-527-8963 maryhpmann@gmail.com On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 1:39 PM Tania Flores <tflores@laquintaca.gov> wrote: Good afternoon, 1034 I have updated the Club at Coral Mountain webpage to include the following documents: Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 Site Development Permit 2025-0001 Site Development Permit 2025-0002 I believe these are the documents you were requesting when you came in this afternoon. Thank you. yea 014 Tania Flores, CMC I Administrative Technician Design & Development Department City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico I La Quinta, CA 92253 Ph. (760) 777-7023 TFlores LaQuintaCA.gov www.LaQuintaCA.gov 3 1035 ATTACHMENT 5 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025 — 012 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP AND TWO SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMITS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A GOLF COURSE, PERIMETER LANDSCAPING AND SALES CENTER FOR THE CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB, AND FIND THAT THE PROJECT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CORAL MOUNTAIN RESORT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310) AND REQUIRES NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW, CONSISTENT WITH CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15162 CASE NUMBERS: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB APPLICANT: CM WAVE DEVELOPMENT LLC WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on October 28, 2025, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by CM Wave Development, LLC for approval of a Tentative Tract Map for the subdivision of 384± acres into 204 residential lots, one commercial lot, as well as lots for golf course and street purposes and two Site Development Permits for construction of the golf course, perimeter landscaping and sales center located at the southwest corner of Avenue 58 and Madison Street, within the Andalusia at Coral Mountain Specific Plan (SP2003-067 Amendment No. 5), more particularly described as: APNs: 764-840-021, 766-070-003, 766-070-006, 766-070-012, 766-070-014, 766-080- 001, 766-080-002, 66-080-004, 766-080-005, 764-210-007, 764-210-028 & 764210029 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on October 17, 2025, as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site and emailed or mailed to all interested parties who have requested notification relating to the project; and WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310) was certified by City Council on March 5, 2024 (Resolution 2024-007), pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), which analyzed up to 750 units and a golf course; and 1036 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2024 PAGE 2OF7 WHEREAS, CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 establishes parameters for the consideration of projects when an EIR has been approved to determine whether subsequent environmental review is required; and WHEREAS, the City has reviewed these parameters and finds that no further environmental review is required in this case because- 1 . There have been no substantial changes to the project that would require major revisions to the previously certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects because the EIR analyzed up to 750 residential units, a golf course, and a commercial corner. In this case, the Tentative Tract Map significantly reduces the number of residential units. The project, as proposed, will reduce the effects and impacts analyzed in the EIR. 2. Substantial changes have not occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken that require major revisions to the previously certified EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects because the Tentative Tract Map and two Site Development Permits do not change the development pattern analyzed in the EIR, nor have conditions changed on or around the project site. The reduction in the number of housing units and the design of the golf course as a "links style" course reduce impacts related to traffic and water demand, among others, and all of the mitigation measures included in the EIR are being implemented. 3. There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known or could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified, showing that the project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR, significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR, or mitigation measures or alternatives that were previously found not to be feasible or that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previously certified EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment. The EIR was certified in 2024, and no new information or change in impacts has occurred since that time. The project, as proposed, will reduce the intensity of development on the project site and will not increase any of the impacts analyzed in the EIR. No mitigation measures are proposed to change. 1037 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2024 PAGE 3OF7 Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 13.12.130 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Tentative Tract Map: 1. The Tentative Tract Map is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan and Specific Plan 2003-067, as amended, and implements the residential, golf course, and commercial uses allowed in those documents. 2. The design and improvement of the proposed subdivision are consistent with the La Quinta General Plan, with the implementation of recommended Conditions of Approval. 3. The design of the subdivision or the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage, nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The mitigation measures included in the Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310) will reduce impacts to less than significant levels, and the reduction in residential lots proposed in the Tract Map will further reduce impacts associated with the project. 4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems, insofar as the map will be required to comply with all laws, standards and requirements associated with sanitary sewer collection, water quality, and other public health issues both in this Map and in subsequent site development permits and other approvals necessary for development of the land. 5. The site of the proposed subdivision is suitable for the density and type of development proposed. The reduction of units from the maximum allowed in the Specific Plan is suitable for the subject property. 6. The proposed Tentative Tract Map is consistent with all applicable provisions of Title 13 of the City's Subdivision Regulations Code, minimum lot area requirements, and other applicable provisions of Title 9 of the City's Municipal Code, Subdivision Map Act and Specific Plan 2003-067 Amendment No. 5. 7. The design and improvements required for the Tentative Tract Map will not conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. All roadway improvements, easements, if any, and surrounding improvements will be completed to City and Specific Plan standards. 1038 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2024 PAGE 4OF7 Site Development Permit 2025-0001 (Golf Course/Perimeter Landscaping) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan 2003-067, as amended, and furthers the goals of the Specific Plan to create a self- contained high -quality community with golf amenities and services. The proposed golf course design reduces the golf course water consumption by creating desert - friendly buffer areas that will enhance the visual character of the site. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City's Zoning Code in terms of site plan and landscaping. The Site Development Permit is compliant with the Specific Plan and Zoning Code's development standards, including standards for setbacks and landscaping requirements. 3. The La Quinta Design and Development Department has determined that this project is consistent with the certified Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (EA2O19-0010, SCH #2021020310), insofar as the Environmental Impact Report analyzed up to 750 residential units, a golf course, and a commercial corner. In this case, the project consists of a golf course on 182 of the 384 acres, consistent with what was previously analyzed. The project, as proposed, will reduce the effects and impacts analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report. 4. The layout of the golf course is compatible and complementary to surrounding development, which includes golf courses to the north, east, and south. 5. The site design of the project is compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The proposed golf course will be of high quality and will incorporate a desert -friendly plant palette which is sensitive to biological resources. 6. The proposed project implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Zoning Code. The landscape palette is consistent with the Specific Plan's and the City's drought -tolerant landscaping requirements. 1039 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2024 PAGE 5OF7 Site Development Permit 2025-0002 (Sales Center) WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.210.010 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Site Development Permit: 1. The proposed development is consistent with the General Plan and Specific Plan 2003-067, as amended, and furthers the goals of the Specific Plan to create a self- contained high -quality community with golf amenities and services. The proposed sales center will provide a highly landscaped, low-lying location offering future residential land sales surrounded by perimeter landscaping and project walls. 2. The proposed development, as conditioned, is consistent with the development standards of the City's Zoning Code in terms of site plan and landscaping. The Site Development Permit is compliant with the Specific Plan and Zoning Code's development standards, including standards for setbacks, building height, and landscaping requirements. 3. The La Quinta Design and Development Department has determined that this project is consistent with the certified Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report for the project (EA2O19-0010, SCH #2021020310), insofar as the Environmental Impact Report analyzed up to 750 residential units, a golf course, and a commercial corner. In this case, the project consists of a sales center located on land which will be developed for neighborhood commercial use in the future, and the sales center is consistent with an office use permitted in the Specific Plan. The project, as proposed, will reduce the effects and impacts analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report. 4. The sales center is compatible and complementary to surrounding developments, insofar as it provides a garden -like setting, limited construction, and compatible design to the surrounding golf course communities. 5. The site design of the project is compatible with the surrounding development and with the quality of design prevalent in the city. The proposed sales center provides a highly landscaped, low -impact development that will facilitate the sales of homes within a limited area of the Specific Plan. 6. The proposed project implements the standards for landscaping and aesthetics established in the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Zoning Code. The landscape palette is consistent with the Specific Plan's and City's drought -tolerant landscaping requirements, while the low -profile buildings and central courtyard facilitate low -impact development of the site. 1040 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28. 2024 PAGE 6 OF 7 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the Findings of the Planning Commission in this case. SECTION 2. That the above project was previously analyzed in compliance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) in that the City Council certified the Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (EA2019-0010, SCH #2021020310), and the proposed Tentative Tract Map and Site Development Permits are consistent with Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, insofar as conditions have not changed, impacts of the project are equivalent or less than those analyzed in the Environmental Impact Report, and no new information is known which would change the severity of impacts or require new mitigation measures.. SECTION 3. That it does hereby approve Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001, Site Development Permit 2025-0001, and Site Development Permit 2025-0002 for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval [Exhibits A, B, and C]. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission, held on October 28, 2025, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Bohlinger, Guerrero, Hundt, McCune, Nieto, and Chairperson Hassett NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Hernandez ABSTAIN: None OUG HASSETT, Chairp rson City of La Quinta, California 1041 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001; SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001, SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025 0002 PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2024 PAGE 7 OF 7 ATTEST: ccw CHERI FLORES, Interim Design and Development Director City of La Quinta, California 1042 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 1 of 30 C,FNFRAI 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Title 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Website at www.laquintaca.gov. 3. Tentative Tract Map 2022-0003 shall expire three years from the approval date in accordance with LQMC Section 13.12.150, unless recorded or granted a time extension pursuant to the requirements of LQMC Section 13.12.160. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit(s) by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design & Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) 1043 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 2 of 30 The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above -listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times, through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. 1044 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 3 of 30 D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The inclusion in the Master Homeowners' Association (HOA) Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required. 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate, and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if the Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 9. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street rights -of - way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 11. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: 1045 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 4 of 30 A. PUBLIC STREETS Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial) — No additional right-of- way dedication is required. 55 feet from the centerline of Madison Street for a total 110-foot ultimate developed right of way 2. Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial) — 55 feet from the centerline of Avenue 58 along the project boundary 3. Avenue 60 (Collector) — 40 feet from the centerline of Avenue 60 for a total 80-foot ultimate developed right-of-way. 4. Calle Conchita (Local Street) - No additional right-of-way dedication is required. 30 feet from the centerline of Calle Conchita for a total 60-foot ultimate developed right-of-way except for the 80-foot right-of-way portion connecting to Madison Street granted in a Grant of Easement and Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 2013-0360337, of Official Records dated July 26, 2013. 12. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street rights - of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 13. The private street rights -of -way to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS Property line shall be placed at the back of curb, similar to the layout shown on the tentative map and the typical street section shown on the tentative map. Use of smooth curves instead of angular lines at property lines is recommended. Streets "A" through "I" - Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one (1) side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited, and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 14. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 1046 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 5 of 30 15. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 16. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights -of -way shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights -of -way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 17. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot -wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet (5) in width with the express written approval of IID. 18. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights - of -way as follows: A. Madison Street (Secondary Arterial) - 10-feet from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) - 10-feet from the R/W-P/L. C. Avenue 60 (Collector) - 10-feet from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth for a meandering wall design as approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages, including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 19. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 20. Direct vehicular access to Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita from lots with frontage along Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Tentative Tract Map, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. 1047 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 6 of 30 21. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 22. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted or recorded over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 23. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties And Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 24. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Where a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, it shall be installed in accordance with City standards. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 25. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses). A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Construct Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Madison Street frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 1048 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 7 of 30 b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide for full access movements at the primary entry and restore the median landscaping. A left turn deceleration lane for the northbound traffic serving the main project entry shall provide a minimum of 150 feet of vehicle queuing as determined by the traffic study. c. Restripe southbound lanes to an 8-foot bike/cart lane, a 4-foot buffer lane, and two (2) 11-foot thru lanes or as approved by the City Engineer. 2) Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Widen the south side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the south side as specified in the General Plan to accommodate an 11-foot travel lane and an 8-foot shoulder, and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Avenue 58 frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 3) Avenue 60 (Collector): a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary plus a distance of 100± feet past the CVWD well site to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions, and extend improvements to connect to the existing easterly paved street segment. The north curb face shall be located 25 feet north of the centerline. Street 1049 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 8 of 30 widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. A hammerhead or similar design shall be provided at the western terminus, per Fire Department approval. b. Construct a 6-foot-wide sidewalk 4) Calle Conchita a. Improve street within project boundary with paving and all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation, or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 5) The applicant shall install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and the project's main access prior to issuance of the 2O4tn building permit for a dwelling unit within the development per the traffic study or when warrants are met, whichever comes first. Applicant is responsible for 100% of the cost of designing and installing the traffic signal. The security bond shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant. 6) The applicant is responsible for 25% of the cost to design and install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 58. Applicant shall bond for 25% of the traffic signal. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Streets "A" through "I" — Construct internal streets per the approved layout shown on the tentative map and/or as approved by the City Engineer. Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one (1) side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 1050 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 9 of 30 2) The location of driveways of corner lots shall not be located within the curb return and away from the intersection when possible. 26. The main gated entry on Madison Street shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length of 62 feet from the call box to the street; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -accepted vehicles. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1" = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turnaround out onto the main street from the gated entry. Pursuant to said condition, there shall be a minimum of 25 feet of width provided at the turnaround opening. Two (2) lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry; one (1) lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one (1) lane for visitors. The two (2) travel lanes shall be a minimum of 20 feet of total paved roadway surface or as approved by the Fire Department. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 27. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Collector 4.0" a.c /5.0" c.a.b. Secondary Arterial 4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 28. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two (2) years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six (6) months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six (6) months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current 1051 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 10 of 30 production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. 29. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Madison Street (Primary Entry): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. B. Madison Street (Golf Course Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. C. Madison Street (Emergency Access): Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. D. Madison Street (just south of Avenue 58): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. E. Avenue 60 (South Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. F. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Westerly Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. G. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Easterly Access): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. 30. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 31. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 32. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 33. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and, in particular, the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. 1052 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 11 of 30 B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required, including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans so that ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for accessible parking spaces or as approved by the City Engineer. One (1) van -accessible handicapped parking stall is required per eight (8) handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking spaces shall be a minimum of 26 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 34. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 35. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two (2) years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six (6) months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six (6) months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. 1053 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 12 of 30 36. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. 37. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. FINAL MAPS 38. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 39. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 40. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Engineer. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Mass Grading Plan 1" = 100' Horizontal B. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal D. Erosion Control Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal E. Hydrology Report (Plan submitted in Report Form) F. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through F to be submitted concurrently. 1054 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 13 of 30 G. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical H. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal I. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 "= 4' Vertical J. Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal NOTE: G through H to be submitted concurrently The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the Public Works Director. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. K. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200 feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants), and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1 foot (1') of cover or as established in the structural calculations and details, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements, including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building 1055 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 14 of 30 floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements, and accessibility requirements. 41. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets, and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.lag uintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 42. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved plans previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record (EOR) during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the FOR may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of Record Drawing submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 43. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIX) guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 44. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIX) entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security). 45. Prior to constructing any off -site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both Performance and Labor & Material Bonds, each valued at 100% of the cost of the off -site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 46. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 1056 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 15 of 30 47. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed or secured prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 48. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this Tentative Tract Map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first -priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 40t" Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit(s) related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 49. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off- 1057 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 16 of 30 site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable TV improvements. 50. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. nRAnINVn 51. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 52. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 53. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a professional registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. An Erosion Control Plan showing Best Management Practices prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A Final WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California. 1058 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 17 of 30 F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report and shall be certified as being adequate by a Soils Engineer, or Engineering Geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish the security if it is expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 54. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping or stabilized with such other erosion control measures as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 55. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.6O.24O(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e., the slope at the back of the landscape lot), which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first 18 inches behind the curb. 56. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 57. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot (1') higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. Where compliance within the above -stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties, and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 58. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (05) from the elevations shown on the 1059 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 18 of 30 approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 59. Prior to the issuance of a building permit(s) for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. nRAINAr,F 60. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for Tract Map No. 39058, Coral Mountain Project (TTM2O25-0001), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 61. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on -site during the 100- year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1-hour, 3-hour, 6-hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total runoff. 62. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 63. In the design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches (2") per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero (0) unless the applicant provides site -specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 64. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well 1060 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 19 of 30 sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 65. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 66. For on -site above -ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance -free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 67. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation that directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 68. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 69. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 70. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 71. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ.. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopment Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction, and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. 1061 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 20 of 30 2. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project -specific WQMP shall be provided, which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. 3. The developer/owner shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 72. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 73. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures, including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 74. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 75. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located so as not to conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 76. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings, and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, 1062 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 21 of 30 the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 77. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 78. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots. 79. All new landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 80. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing, and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Manager determines extenuating circumstances exist that justify an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until they have been signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 81. The applicant or their agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 82. Prior to final approval of the installation of landscaping, the Landscape Architect of record shall provide the Design and Development Department a letter stating he/she has personally inspected the installation and that it conforms with the Final Landscaping Plans as approved by the City. 83. If staff determines during final landscaping inspection that adjustments are required in order to meet the intent of the Planning Commission's approval, the Planning Manager shall review and approve any such revisions to the landscape plan. 1063 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 22 of 30 MAINTENANCE 84. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 85. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, multi -use trail, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 86. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 87. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect at the time the applicant submits an application for plan check and permits. FIRE DEPARTMENT 88. Fire Protection Water Supplies/Fire Flow - Prior to building permit issuance for new construction, the applicant shall provide documentation showing a water system capable of delivering the required fire flow. The minimum number of fire hydrants required, as well as the location and spacing of fire hydrants, shall comply with the Fire Code. 89. Fire Apparatus Access Roads — The minimum clear width of a fire apparatus access road is 24 feet. Where a center median or guard house is installed near an entrance/exit, the required access road width of 24 feet shall be provided on the incoming side. The outgoing side shall be not less than 16 feet wide. 90. Fire apparatus access and approved access walkways shall be provided to the recreational lake and the existing adobe structure from the streets within the tract. 91. Fire apparatus access roads shall be provided to within 150 feet of all exterior portions of buildings unless otherwise approved by the Fire Department. For one - and two-family dwellings with an approved automatic fire sprinkler system, this distance is permitted to be extended from 150 feet to 300 feet. 92. Dead-end fire apparatus access roads that exceed 150 feet in length shall be provided with an approved turnaround. 1064 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 23 of 30 93. Fire apparatus access roads serving commercial or residential development shall be designed, constructed, and maintained to support the imposed loads of RVC fire apparatus with a total weight of 80,000 pounds. Apparatus weight is distributed as 55,000 pounds on tandem rear axles and 25,000 pounds on the front axle. The surface shall be designed to provide all-weather driving capabilities. A letter or statement, wet -stamped and signed by a registered engineer, shall be provided on the plans certifying that any new road meets this 80,000, all-weather requirement. 94. Fire lane identification is required to restrict the parking of vehicles at various locations. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, a plan shall be submitted to the Office of the Fire Marshal showing the method of identifying the fire lane. Reference Riverside County Fire Department Guideline OFM-01A. 95. Plans for the construction of the gates to be installed across the fire apparatus access roads shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review and approval. 96. Electric gate openers shall comply with UL 325. In the event of loss of normal power to the gate operating mechanism, it shall be automatically transferred to a fail-safe mode, allowing the gate to be pushed open by a single firefighter without any other actions, knowledge, or manipulation of the operating mechanism being necessary and without the use of battery back-up power; this shall be noted on the plan. The manufacturer's specification sheet demonstrating compliance with this method of operation during power loss shall be provided or scanned directly onto the plan. Should the gate be too large or heavy for a single firefighter to open manually, a secondary source of power, by means of an emergency generator or a capacitor with enough reserve to automatically and immediately open the gate upon loss of primary power, shall be provided. 97. The gate control for electronic gates shall be operable by a Knox emergency override key switch (with mounting plate: model #3502 or #3503). The key switch shall be placed between 42" and 48" above the road surface at the right side of the access gate, within two feet (2') of the edge of the road. The key switch shall be readily visible and unobstructed from the fire lane leading to the gate. 98. New motorized gates shall also be equipped with optical receivers to allow emergency response personnel to remotely open the gate when the emergency vehicle approaches the gate. The receiver shall be located to maximize signal reception from an approaching RVC apparatus. Devices shall be compatible with RVC preemption devices. A functional test of the automatic opening equipment, witnessed by RVC-OFM, is required prior to final acceptance. 99. Building Construction Permit Review - Submittal of construction plans to the Fire Department will be required. Final fire and life safety conditions will be addressed 1065 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 24 of 30 when the Fire Department reviews these plans. These conditions will be based on the California Fire Code, California Building Code (CBC), and related codes/standards adopted at the time of construction plan submittal. 100. Fire Sprinkler System - All new commercial buildings and structures 3,600 square feet or larger shall be protected by a fire sprinkler system. Reference CFC 903.2 as amended by the County of Riverside 101. Residential Fire Sprinklers - Residential fire sprinklers are required in all one and two-family dwellings per the California Residential Code (CRC). Plans must be submitted to the Office of the Fire Marshal for review and approval prior to installation. Reference CRC 313.2 15. Fire Alarm and Detection System - A water flow monitoring system and/or fire alarm system may be required, as determined during building construction plan review. Reference CFC 903.4 and CFC 907.2 102. All one and two-family dwellings shall display street numbers in a prominent location on the street side of the residence. Minimum numeral height shall be 4 inches (4") with a contrasting color. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 103. The trail located on the western boundary of the project shall be installed and completed, including fencing/walls and access point markers, 60 days following the completion of grading for the golf course. The Final Landscape Plan shall include details for planting, trail surface, and walls. 104. Prior to any ground disturbance in the project area, an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) shall be established around the existing adobe (Site 33-08388) in a location and to the specifications of the project archaeologist. The ESA shall be shown on the Final Map and recorded against the parcel. 105. The realignment and construction of Calle Conchita shall be completed in conjunction with the construction of the perimeter wall for the project site. The developer shall coordinate with the existing homeowner(s) to the west of the project site on Calle Conchita and ensure that safe access for residents and emergency services is maintained during all road construction activities. 106. The access driveway located immediately north of Lot AT shall be maintained for emergency access only and shall conform to Fire Department standards for such access points. 107. Prior to the occupancy of the first residence on the project site, and in conjunction with the creation of CC&Rs for the property, a preservation and maintenance plan, 1066 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 25 of 30 including interpretative signage, as determined appropriate, shall be prepared by the project archaeologist and included in the CC&Rs for the project site. The Homeowners' Association and/or Golf Course ownership shall be responsible for the long-term maintenance of the Adobe site. 108. Prior to any ground disturbance on any portion of the site, the developer shall provide the City with: a. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating compliance with burrowing owl and nesting bird requirements. b. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating completion of 2025 bat surveys, and results (presence or absence) of same. c. Letter from a qualified historian demonstrating the correct installation of fencing surrounding the adobe. d. Letters from a qualified archaeologist and Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Tribal Historic Preservation Officer confirming that all remediation, data recovery, and mitigation of identified sites and resources have been completed to their satisfaction. e. Letter(s) from ACBCI approving the Archaeological Treatment, Disposition and Monitoring Plan and the Rock Art Management Plan, with a copy of the approved plan attached. f. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified archaeologist and ACBCI for all ground disturbing activities. g. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified biologist and noise engineer. 109. The Final Landscaping Plan is to include: a. Demonstration of an average 30-foot setback from right-of-way to home structure on Madison Street and Avenue 58. b. The wall on Avenue 58 and Madison Street shall provide a weight of at least four (4) pounds per square foot of face area with no decorative cutouts or line - of -sight openings between shielded areas and the roadways. The barrier must present a solid face from top to bottom. Unnecessary openings or decorative cutouts shall not be made. All gaps (except for weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking. 1067 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 26 of 30 110. All construction plans to include in their notes: a. Paving installation activity shall not overlap with the architectural coating (building painting) activity. b. The contractor shall adhere to applicable measures contained in Table 1 of Rule 403, including, but not limited to: • All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. • The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three (3) times a day, preferably in the mid -morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are limited to 15 miles per hour or less. c. The following measures shall be incorporated into project plans and specifications as implementation of SCAQMD Rule 1113 (3): • Only "Low -Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)" paints (no more than 50 grams/liter (g/L) of VOC) consistent with SCAQMD Rule 1113 shall be used. BACM AQ-3: The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood -burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. 111. Burrowing owl surveys shall be performed by a qualified biologist, approved by the City, prior to any site disturbance activities. A minimum of two (2) surveys, occurring at least three (3) weeks apart, shall be completed in advance of any site disturbance activities. If disturbance activities are expected to start during the burrowing owl breeding season, three (3) surveys shall be completed. The final burrowing owl survey shall be completed within three (3) days prior to initiation of any site disturbance activities. The pre -construction survey shall be conducted in accordance with accepted protocol and the requirements specified in the CVMSHCP. Prior to construction, a qualified biologist will survey the construction area and an area up to 500 feet outside the project limits for burrows that could be used by burrowing owls. If the burrow is determined to be occupied, the burrow will be flagged, and a 160-foot diameter buffer will be established during the non - breeding season or a 250-foot diameter buffer during the breeding season. The buffer area will be staked and marked with flags. No development activities will be M., PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 27 of 30 permitted within the buffer zone until the young are no longer dependent on the burrow and have left the burrow. If the burrow is found to be unoccupied, the burrow will be made inaccessible to owls, and construction may proceed. If either a nesting or escape burrow is occupied, owls shall be relocated pursuant to accepted Wildlife Agency protocols. Determination of the appropriate method of relocation, such as eviction/passive relocation or active relocation, shall be based on the specific site conditions (e.g., distance to nearest suitable habitat and presence of burrows within that habitat) in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. If burrowing owls are observed within the Project site during construction activities, CDFW shall be notified immediately and provided with proposed avoidance and minimization measures, consistent with the requirements of the CVMSHCP. 112. Removal of trees (including palm trees) shall occur outside the bat maternity season (March 15—August 31 in the Coachella Valley), which coincides with the bird nesting season, to avoid the potential for "take" of flightless young. Trees and snags that have been identified as confirmed or potential roost sites require a two- step removal process and the involvement of a bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. Consistent with CDFW protocols, this two-step removal shall occur over two (2) consecutive days as follows: on Day 1, branches and limbs not containing cavities, as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a bat biologist. The disturbance caused by limb removal, followed by an interval of one (1) evening, will allow bats to safely abandon the roost. 113. To avoid impacts to roosting bats from the installation of new light fixtures associated with the proposed development, all lighting fixtures shall have light shields or similar devices (i.e., dark sky compliant lighting) installed to ensure that there is no light trespass onto Coral Mountain and the surrounding open space. A supplemental light study will be performed to collect nighttime lighting measurements and confirm that no light trespass onto Coral Mountain is occurring prior to occupancy of the first housing unit adjacent to Coral Mountain. 114. A qualified bat biologist shall confirm the absence of roosting bats prior to any restoration work or other disturbance of the adobe site. If bats are found or if the absence of bats cannot be confirmed, the bat biologist will install or directly supervise the installation of humane eviction devices and exclusionary material to prevent bats from roosting in the building. Implementation of the humane eviction/exclusions is typically performed in the Fall (September or October) preceding construction activity at each structure to avoid impacts to hibernating bats during the winter months or during the maternity season (March 15—August 1069 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 28 of 30 31 in the Coachella Valley), when nonvolant (flightless) young are present. Any humane eviction/exclusion devices must be installed at least 10 days prior to the demolition of a structure housing bats to allow sufficient time for the bats to vacate the roost(s). 115. To ensure compliance with the California Fish and Game Code and the MBTA, and to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds, vegetation removal and ground - disturbing activities shall be conducted outside the general bird nesting season. Any vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and/or construction activities that occur during the nesting season will require that all suitable habitats be surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist who is pre -approved by the CDFW. Prior to commencement of clearing, a qualified biologist shall conduct pre -construction surveys within 14 days and repeated three (3) days prior to ground -disturbing activities. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) around the nest adjacent to construction will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. During construction activities, the qualified biologist shall continue biological monitoring activities at a frequency recommended by the qualified biologist, using their best professional judgment, or as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies. If nesting birds are detected, avoidance and minimization measures may be adjusted, and construction activities may be stopped or redirected by the qualified biologist using their best professional judgment as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies to avoid the "take" of nesting birds. 116. To ensure the project will avoid any significant construction noise impacts on wildlife using Coral Mountain, noise monitoring will be conducted for all construction activities using heavy equipment within 150 feet of the base of Coral Mountain. If noise levels exceed 75 dBA, construction operational changes or other project modifications shall be made, as directed by the project biologist, to reduce the noise levels at Coral Mountain to below 75 dBA. 117. A written plan for an educational program about the Peninsular bighorn sheep and their associated habitat shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of the first building permit for residential units on the property. The plan shall demonstrate how educational programs will be implemented and maintained throughout the resort, open space, and low -density community programs through the use of signage, pamphlets, and staff education. The Education Program should inform the reason why specific measures are being taken to support the recovery of Peninsular bighorn sheep. The Education Program should include the ecology of Peninsular bighorn sheep, threats this species currently faces, and how recovery actions will reduce these threats. This includes information that explains: (1) why restrictions on toxic plants, fences, and 1070 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 29 of 30 pesticides are needed; (2) how artificial feeding of coyotes could adversely affect bighorn sheep; and (3) how recreational activities may affect sheep. The use of interpretive signs is encouraged. 118. The contractor shall provide the City with cultural sensitivity training attendance sign-up sheets for all construction workers involved in the project, including custom homes. The requirement for cultural sensitivity training shall be included on all building plans. 119. All earth -moving operations reaching beyond the depth of two feet (2') shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor, and continuous monitoring will become necessary if undisturbed, potentially fossiliferous lakebed sediments are encountered. The monitor shall be empowered to stop earth -moving activities if fossils are identified. The monitor shall be prepared to quickly salvage fossils but must have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction equipment to allow for the removal of abundant or large specimens. A monitoring plan shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any earth - moving permit or the disturbance of any soils on the site, which will include: • Samples of sediments shall be collected and processed to recover small fossil remains. • Recovered specimens shall be identified and curated at a repository with permanent retrievable storage that would allow for further research in the future. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered specimens and a discussion of their significance when appropriate, shall be prepared upon completion of the research procedures outlined above. The report shall be provided to the City within 30 days of the conclusion of monitoring activities. 120. Prior to the issuance of the first occupancy permit for a residential structure on the site, the project applicant shall purchase a minimum of 72,000 MTCO2e credits (2,400 MTCO2e per year for 30 years). The purchase of carbon credits must be made from a CARB-approved carbon registry with independent third -party verification. Alternatively, the project applicant may submit a greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction plan to the City for approval that achieves an equal level of GHG reduction. The GHG plan must include enforceable actions that reduce GHG emissions to at or below the total mitigated values. 121. During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor 1071 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-0001 (TTM 39058) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 30 of 30 shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 122. The perimeter wall and Peninsular Bighorn Sheep fencing shall be complete prior to the initiation of precise grading on any portion of the property. 1072 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 1 of 27 GENERAL 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Site Development Permit shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: TTM2025-0001 SDP2025-0002 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. The Site Development Permit shall expire twenty-four (24) months after approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) Section 9.200.080 unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design & Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) 1073 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 2 of 27 The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above -listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times, through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. 1074 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 3 of 27 D. All erosion and sediment control approved by the City Engineer pursuant to this project. BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be prior to any onsite or offsite grading, E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The inclusion in the Master Homeowners' Association (HOA) Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required. 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate, and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if the Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 9. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street rights -of - way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 11. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: 1075 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 4 of 27 A. PUBLIC STREETS Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial) — No additional right-of- way dedication is required. 55 feet from the centerline of Madison Street for a total 110-foot ultimate developed right-of-way 2. Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial) — 55 feet from the centerline of Avenue 58 along the project boundary 3. Avenue 60 (Collector) — 40 feet from the centerline of Avenue 60 for a total 80-foot ultimate developed right-of-way. 4. No additional right-of-way dedication is required. 30 feet from the centerline of Calle Conchita for a total 60-foot ultimate developed right- of-way except for the 80-foot right-of-way portion connecting to Madison Street granted in a Grant of Easement and Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 2013-0360337, of Official Records dated July 26, 2013. 12. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street rights - of -way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 13. The private street rights -of -way to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS Property line shall be placed at the back of curb, similar to the layout shown on the tentative map and the typical street section shown on the tentative map. Use of smooth curves instead of angular lines at property lines is recommended. Streets "A" through "I" - Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one (1) side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 14. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 1076 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 5 of 27 15. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 16. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights -of -way shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights -of -way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 17. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot -wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet (5') in width with the express written approval of IID. 18. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights - of -way as follows: A. Madison Street (Secondary Arterial) — 10 feet from the RAN-P/L. B. Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) — 10 feet from the R/W-P/L. C. Avenue 60 (Collector) — 10 feet from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth for a meandering wall design as approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages, including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 19. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 20. Direct vehicular access to Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita from lots with frontage along Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Tentative Tract Map, or as otherwise conditioned in these Conditions of Approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. 1077 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 6 of 27 21. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 22. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted or recorded over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 23. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties And Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 24. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Where a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, it shall be installed in accordance with City standards. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 25. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses). A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Construct Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Madison Street frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 1078 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 7 of 27 b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide for full access movements at the primary entry and restore the median landscaping. A left turn deceleration lane for the northbound traffic serving the main project entry shall provide a minimum of 150 feet of vehicle queuing as determined by the traffic study. c. Restripe southbound lanes to an 8-foot bike/cart lane, 4-foot buffer lane, and two (2) 11-foot thru lanes or as approved by the City Engineer. 2) Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Widen the south side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the south side as specified in the General Plan to accommodate an 11-foot travel lane and an 8-foot shoulder, and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Avenue 58 frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 3) Avenue 60 (Collector): a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary plus a distance of 100± feet past the CVWD well site to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions and extend improvements to connect to the existing easterly paved street segment. The north curb face shall be located 25 feet north of the centerline. Street 1079 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 8 of 27 widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. A hammerhead or similar design shall be provided at the western terminus, per Fire Department approval. b. Construct a 6-foot-wide sidewalk 4) Calle Conchita a. Improve street within project boundary with paving and all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation, or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 5) The applicant shall install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and the project's main access prior to issuance of the 2O4tn building permit for a dwelling unit within the development per the traffic study or when warrants are met, whichever comes first. Applicant is responsible for 100% of the cost of designing and installing the traffic signal. The security bond shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant. 6) The applicant is responsible for 25% of the cost to design and install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 58. Applicant shall bond for 25% of the traffic signal. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Streets "A" through "I" — Construct internal streets per the approved layout shown on the tentative map and/or as approved by the City Engineer. Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one (1) side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 1080 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 9 of 27 2) The location of driveways of corner lots shall not be located within the curb return and away from the intersection when possible. 26. The main gated entry on Madison Street shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length of 62 feet from the call box to the street; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -accepted vehicles. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1" = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turnaround out onto the main street from the gated entry. Pursuant to said condition, there shall be a minimum of 25 feet of width provided at the turnaround opening. Two (2) lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry: one (1) lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one (1) lane for visitors. The two (2) travel lanes shall be a minimum of 20 feet of total paved roadway surface or as approved by the Fire Department. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 27. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Collector 4.0" a.c /5.0" c.a.b. Secondary Arterial 4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 28. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two (2) years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six (6) months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six (6) months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current 1081 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 10 of 27 production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. 29. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Madison Street (Primary Entry): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. B. Madison Street (Golf Course Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. C. Madison Street (Emergency Access): Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. D. Madison Street (just south of Avenue 58): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. E. Avenue 60 (South Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. F. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Westerly Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. G. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Easterly Access): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. 30. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 31. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 32. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 33. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and, in particular, the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. 1082 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 11 of 27 B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required, including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans so that ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for accessible parking spaces or as approved by the City Engineer. One (1) van -accessible handicapped parking stall is required per eight (8) handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking spaces shall be a minimum of 26 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 34. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 35. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two (2) years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six (6) months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. 1083 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 12 of 27 36. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. 37. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 38. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 39. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Engineer. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Mass Grading Plan 1" = 100' Horizontal B. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. PM 10 Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal D. Erosion Control Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal E. Hydrology Report (Plan submitted in Report Form) F. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through F to be submitted concurrently. G. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical 1084 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 13 of 27 H. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 "= 4' Vertical J. Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal NOTE: G through H to be submitted concurrently. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the Public Works Director. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. K. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200 feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants), and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1 foot (1') of cover or as established in the structural calculations and details, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements, including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements, and accessibility requirements. 1085 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 14 of 27 40. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets, and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.lag uintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 41. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved plans previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record (EOR) during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the FOR may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of Record Drawing submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 42. Prior to constructing any off -site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bond, each valued at 100% of the cost of the off -site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 43. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 44. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping, and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed or secured prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Iwo PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 15 of 27 In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 45. Depending on the timing of the development of the Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of the Tentative Tract Map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first -priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 40th Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit(s) related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 46. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off - site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable TV improvements. 47. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, 1087 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 16 of 27 withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. f.RAnINf; 48. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 49. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 50. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a professional registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. An Erosion Control Plan showing Best Management Practices prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A Final WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California. F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report and shall be certified as being adequate by a Soils Engineer, or Engineering Geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish the security if it is expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. W., PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 17 of 27 51. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping or stabilized with such other erosion control measures as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 52. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e., the slope at the back of the landscape lot), which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six feet (6') adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right-of-way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first 18 inches behind the curb. 53. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 54. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot (1') higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. Where compliance within the above -stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties, and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 55. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5') from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 56. Prior to the issuance of a building permit(s) for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. me PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 18 of 27 DRAINAGE 57. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for Tract Map No. 39058, Coral Mountain Project (TTM2025-0001), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 58. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on -site during the 100- year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1-hour, 3-hour, 6-hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total runoff. 59. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 60. In the design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches (2") per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero (0) unless the applicant provides site -specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 61. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 62. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 63. For on -site above -ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3.1 and shall be planted with maintenance -free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 64. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation that directly falls onto the setback) 1090 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 19 of 27 will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 65. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 66. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 67. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 68. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ.. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopment Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction, and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. 2. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project -specific WQMP shall be provided, which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. 3. The developer/owner shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. 1091 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 20 of 27 UTILITIES 69. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 70. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures, including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 71. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to, the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 72. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located so as not to conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 73. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings, and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 74. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 75. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots. 1092 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 21 of 27 76. All new landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 77. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing, and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to the completion of precise grading. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until they have been signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 78. The applicant or their agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 79. Prior to final approval of the installation of landscaping, the Landscape Architect of record shall provide the Design and Development Department a letter stating they have personally inspected the installation and that it conforms with the Final Landscaping Plans as approved by the City. 80. If staff determines during final landscaping inspection that adjustments are required in order to meet the intent of the Planning Commission's approval, the Planning Manager shall review and approve any such revisions to the landscape plan. 81. All trees shall be a minimum of 36-inch box. 82. After the installation of landscaping and prior to completion of the golf course, all areas covered by "Native Coarse Sand Material" or "Tan Decomposed Granite," as defined in the SDP plan set, shall be sprayed with a clear polymer soil stabilizing solution, such as guar gum, xanthan gum, or synthetic polymers in order to prevent wind blown sand. 83. Final landscape plans within the Peninsular Bighorn Sheep buffer zones shall comply with the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan Prohibited Plant List and Land Use Adjacency Guidelines. MAINTENANCE 84. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 1093 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 22 of 27 85. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, multi -use trail, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 86. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 87. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect at the time the applicant submits an application for plan check and permits. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 88. The trail located on the western boundary of the project shall be installed and completed, including fencing/walls and access point markers, 60 days following the completion of grading for the golf course. The Final Landscape Plan shall include details for the trail surface and walls. 89. The Final Landscaping Plan is to include: a. Demonstration of an average 30-foot setback from right-of-way to home structure on Madison Street and Avenue 58. b. Specific measurements for plain and accent finish wall distances. c. The wall on Avenue 58 and Madison Street shall provide a weight of at least four (4) pounds per square foot of face area with no decorative cutouts or line - of -sight openings between shielded areas and the roadways. The barrier must present a solid face from top to bottom. Unnecessary openings or decorative cutouts shall not be made. All gaps (except for weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking. 90. The perimeter wall, Peninsular Bighorn Sheep fencing, 10-foot trail, and parkway landscaping shall be completed prior to the initiation of precise grading on any portion of the property. Priority shall be given to the southeast corner of the property, in the area of Calle Conchita and Avenue 60, to provide a barrier between existing homes and the project's construction activities. 1094 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 23 of 27 91. The three (3) Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) located on the west boundary of the project site and the adobe site shall be fully protected and fenced, and a letter from the ACBCI approving the protection and fencing shall be provided to the City prior to any ground disturbance, including grubbing or vegetation removal. 92. Prior to any ground disturbance on any portion of the site, the developer shall provide the City with: a. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating compliance with burrowing owl and nesting bird requirements. b. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating completion of 2025 bat surveys, and results (presence or absence) of same. c. Letter from a qualified historian demonstrating the correct installation of fencing surrounding the adobe. d. Letters from a qualified archaeologist and Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Tribal Historic Preservation Officer confirming that all remediation, data recovery, and mitigation of identified sites and resources have been completed to their satisfaction. e. Letter(s) from ACBCI approving the Archaeological Treatment, Disposition and Monitoring Plan and the Rock Art Management Plan, with a copy of the approved plan attached. f. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified archaeologist and ACBCI for all ground disturbing activities. g. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified biologist and noise engineer. 93. The Final Landscaping Plan is to include: a. Demonstration of an average 30-foot setback from right-of-way on Madison Street and Avenue 58. b. The wall on Avenue 58 and Madison Street shall provide a weight of at least four (4) pounds per square foot of face area with no decorative cutouts or line - of -sight openings between shielded areas and the roadways. The barrier must present a solid face from top to bottom. Unnecessary openings or decorative cutouts shall not be made. All gaps (except for weep holes) should be filled with grout or caulking. 1095 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 24 of 27 94. All construction plans are to include in their notes: a. Paving installation activity shall not overlap with the architectural coating (building painting) activity. b. The contractor shall adhere to applicable measures contained in Table 1 of Rule 403, including, but not limited to: • All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. • The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three (3) times a day, preferably in the mid -morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are limited to 15 miles per hour or less. c. The following measures shall be incorporated into project plans and specifications as implementation of SCAQMD Rule 1113 (3): • Only "Low -Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)" paints (no more than 50 grams/liter (g/L) of VOC) consistent with SCAQMD Rule 1113 shall be used. BACM AQ-3: The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood -burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. 95. Burrowing owl surveys shall be performed by a qualified biologist, approved by the City, prior to any site disturbance activities. A minimum of two (2) surveys, occurring at least three (3) weeks apart, shall be completed in advance of any site disturbance activities. If disturbance activities are expected to start during the burrowing owl breeding season, three (3) surveys shall be completed. The final burrowing owl survey shall be completed within three (3) days prior to initiation of any site disturbance activities. The pre -construction survey shall be conducted in accordance with accepted protocol and the requirements specified in the CVMSHCP. Prior to construction, a qualified biologist will survey the construction area and an area up to 500 feet outside the project limits for burrows that could be used by burrowing owls. If the burrow is determined to be occupied, the burrow will be flagged, and a 160-foot diameter buffer will be established during the non - breeding season or a 250-foot diameter buffer during the breeding season. The buffer area will be staked and marked with flags. No development activities will be 1096 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 25 of 27 permitted within the buffer zone until the young are no longer dependent on the burrow and have left the burrow. If the burrow is found to be unoccupied, the burrow will be made inaccessible to owls, and construction may proceed. If either a nesting or escape burrow is occupied, owls shall be relocated pursuant to accepted Wildlife Agency protocols. Determination of the appropriate method of relocation, such as eviction/passive relocation or active relocation, shall be based on the specific site conditions (e.g., distance to nearest suitable habitat and presence of burrows within that habitat) in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. If burrowing owls are observed within the Project site during construction activities, CDFW shall be notified immediately and provided with proposed avoidance and minimization measures, consistent with the requirements of the CVMSHCP. 96. Removal of trees (including palm trees) shall occur outside the bat maternity season (March 15—August 31 in the Coachella Valley), which coincides with the bird nesting season, to avoid the potential for "take" of flightless young. Trees and snags that have been identified as confirmed or potential roost sites require a two- step removal process and the involvement of a bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. Consistent with CDFW protocols this two-step removal shall occur over two (2) consecutive days as follows: on Day 1, branches and limbs not containing cavities, as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a bat biologist. The disturbance caused by limb removal, followed by an interval of one (1) evening, will allow bats to safely abandon the roost. 97. To avoid impacts to roosting bats from the installation of new light fixtures associated with the proposed development, all lighting fixtures shall have light shields or similar devices (i.e., dark sky compliant lighting) installed to ensure that there is no light trespass onto Coral Mountain and the surrounding open space. A supplemental light study will be performed to collect nighttime lighting measurements and confirm that no light trespass onto Coral Mountain is occurring prior to occupancy of the first housing unit adjacent to Coral Mountain. 98. A qualified bat biologist shall confirm the absence of roosting bats prior to any restoration work or other disturbance of the adobe site. If bats are found or if the absence of bats cannot be confirmed, the bat biologist will install or directly supervise the installation of humane eviction devices and exclusionary material to prevent bats from roosting in the building. Implementation of the humane eviction/exclusions is typically performed in the Fall (September or October) preceding construction activity at each structure to avoid impacts to hibernating bats during the winter months or during the maternity season (March 15—August 1097 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 26 of 27 31 in the Coachella Valley), when nonvolant (flightless) young are present. Any humane eviction/exclusion devices must be installed at least 10 days prior to the demolition of a structure housing bats to allow sufficient time for the bats to vacate the roost(s). 99. To ensure compliance with the California Fish and Game Code and the MBTA and to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds, vegetation removal and ground - disturbing activities shall be conducted outside the general bird nesting season. Any vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and/or construction activities that occur during the nesting season will require that all suitable habitats be surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist who is pre -approved by the CDFW. Prior to commencement of clearing, a qualified biologist shall conduct preconstruction surveys within 14 days and repeated three (3) days prior to ground -disturbing activities. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) around the nest adjacent to construction will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. During construction activities, the qualified biologist shall continue biological monitoring activities at a frequency recommended by the qualified biologist using their best professional judgment, or as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies. If nesting birds are detected, avoidance and minimization measures may be adjusted and construction activities stopped or redirected by the qualified biologist using their best professional judgment as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies to avoid the "take" of nesting birds. 100. To ensure the project will avoid any significant construction noise impacts on wildlife using Coral Mountain, noise monitoring will be conducted for all construction activities using heavy equipment within 150 feet of the base of Coral Mountain. If noise levels exceed 75 dBA, construction operational changes or other project modifications shall be made, as directed by the project biologist, to reduce the noise levels at Coral Mountain to below 75 dBA. 101. A written plan for an educational program about the Peninsular bighorn sheep and their associated habitat shall be submitted to the City for review and approval prior to the issuance of the first building permit for residential units on the property. The plan shall demonstrate how educational programs will be implemented and maintained throughout the resort, open space, and low -density community programs through the use of signage, pamphlets, and staff education. The Education Program should inform the reason why specific measures are being taken to support the recovery of Peninsular bighorn sheep. The Education Program should include the ecology of Peninsular bighorn sheep, threats this species currently faces, and how recovery actions will reduce these threats. This includes information that explains: (1) why restrictions on toxic plants, fences, and pesticides are needed; (2) how artificial feeding of coyotes could adversely affect 1098 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 (GOLF COURSE/PERIMETER LANDSCAPING) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 27 of 27 bighorn sheep; and (3) how recreational activities may affect sheep. The use of interpretive signs is encouraged. 102. The contractor shall provide the City with cultural sensitivity training attendance sign up sheets for all construction workers involved in the project, including custom homes. The requirement for cultural sensitivity training shall be included on all building plans. 103. All earth -moving operations reaching beyond the depth of two feet (2') shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor, and continuous monitoring will become necessary if undisturbed, potentially fossiliferous lakebed sediments are encountered. The monitor shall be empowered to stop earth -moving activities if fossils are identified. The monitor shall be prepared to quickly salvage fossils, but must have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction equipment to allow for the removal of abundant or large specimens. A monitoring plan shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any earth - moving permit or the disturbance of any soils on the site, which will include: • Samples of sediments shall be collected and processed to recover small fossil remains. • Recovered specimens shall be identified and curated at a repository with permanent retrievable storage that would allow for further research in the future. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered specimens and a discussion of their significance when appropriate, shall be prepared upon completion of the research procedures outlined above. The report shall be provided to the City within 30 days of the conclusion of monitoring activities. 104. During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 1099 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 1 of 26 GENERAL The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers, and employees from any claim, action, or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Site Development Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Site Development Permit shall comply with all applicable conditions and/or mitigation measures for the following related approvals: TTM2025-0001 SDP2025-0001 In the event of any conflict(s) between approval conditions and/or provisions of these approvals, the Design and Development Director shall adjudicate the conflict by determining the precedence. 3. The Site Development Permit shall expire twenty-four (24) months after approval and shall become null and void in accordance with La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC) Section 9.200.080 unless a building permit has been issued. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Public Works Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Public Works Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Exemption Form — Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • La Quinta Design & Development Department • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board • SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) 1100 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 2 of 26 • South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above -listed agencies. When these requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvement plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times, through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 1101 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 3 of 26 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The inclusion in the Master Homeowners' Association (HOA) Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required. 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if the Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset, and the Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS 9. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction, and reconstruction of essential improvements. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street rights -of - way in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 1102 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 4 of 26 11. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial) — No additional right-of- way dedication is required. 55 feet from the centerline of Madison Street for a total 110-foot ultimate developed right-of-way 2. Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial) — 55 feet from the centerline of Avenue 58 along the project boundary 3. Avenue 60 (Collector) — 40 feet from the centerline of Avenue 60 for a total 80-foot ultimate developed right-of-way 4. Calle Conchita (Local Street) - No additional right-of-way dedication is required. 30 feet from the centerline of Calle Conchita for a total 60-foot ultimate developed right-of-way except for the 80-foot right-of-way portion connecting to Madison Street granted in a Grant of Easement and Agreement recorded as Instrument No. 2013-0360337, of Official Records dated July 26, 2013. 12. The private street rights -of -way to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS Property line shall be placed at the back of curb ,similar to the layout shown on the tentative map and the typical street section shown in the tentative map. Use of smooth curves instead of angular lines at property lines is recommended. Streets "A" through "I" - Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side, and 24 feet if on -street parking is prohibited and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 13. Right-of-way geometry for standard knuckles and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 1103 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 5 of 26 14. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. 15. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street rights -of -way shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such rights -of -way, the applicant shall grant the necessary rights -of -way within 60 days of a written request by the City. 16. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot -wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along both sides of, all private streets. Such easement may be reduced to five feet (5) in width with the express written approval of IID. 17. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public rights - of -way as follows: A. Madison Street (Secondary Arterial) - 10 feet from the R/W-P/L. B. Avenue 58 (Secondary Arterial) - 10 feet from the R/W-P/L. C. Avenue 60 (Collector) - 10 feet from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth for a meandering wall design as approved. The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages, including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 18. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 19. Direct vehicular access to Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita from lots with frontage along Madison Street, Avenue 58, Avenue 60, and Calle Conchita is restricted, except for those access points identified on the Tentative Tract Map, or as otherwise conditioned in these Conditions of Approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. 1104 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 6 of 26 20. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 21. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted or recorded over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 22. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties And Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 23. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. Where a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, it shall be installed in accordance with City standards. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 24. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses). A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Madison Street (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Construct Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Madison Street frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 1105 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 7 of 26 b. Reconstruct the existing landscaped median to provide for full access movements at the primary entry and restore the median landscaping. A left turn deceleration lane for the northbound traffic serving the main project entry shall provide a minimum of 150 feet of vehicle queuing as determined by the traffic study. c. Restripe southbound lanes to eight foot (8') bike/cart lane, four foot (4') buffer lane, and two (2) 11 foot thru lanes or as approved by the City Engineer. 2) Avenue 58 (Modified Secondary Arterial): a. Widen the south side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary to its ultimate width on the south side as specified in the General Plan to accommodate an 11-foot travel lane and an 8-foot shoulder, and the requirements of these conditions. Street widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. b. Multi -Use Trail - The applicant shall construct a multi -use trail per La Quinta Standard 260 and as required in the Specific Plan or as approved by the City Engineer along the Avenue 58 frontage within the landscaped setback. The location and design of the path shall be approved by the City. A split rail fence shall be constructed along the roadway side of the multi -use trail. At grade intersection crossings shall be of a medium, design, and location as approved by the Public Works Department on the street improvement plan submittal. Multi -Use Trail will be maintained by the Developer or HOA, as applicable. 3) Avenue 60 (Collector): a. Widen the north side of the street along all frontage to the project boundary plus a distance of 100± feet past the CVWD well site to its ultimate width on the north side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions and extend improvements to connect to the existing easterly paved street segment. The north curb face shall be located 25 feet north of the centerline. Street 1106 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 8 of 26 widening improvements shall include all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. A hammerhead or similar design shall be provided at the western terminus, per Fire Department approval. b. Construct a 6-foot-wide sidewalk 4) Calle Conchita a. Improve street within project boundary with paving and all appurtenant components, such as, but not limited to, curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation, or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). 5) The applicant shall install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and the project's main access prior to issuance of the 2O4tn building permit for a dwelling unit within the development per the traffic study or when warrants are met, whichever comes first. Applicant is responsible for 100% of the cost of designing and installing the traffic signal. The security bond shall remain in full force and effect until the signal is actually installed by the applicant. 6) The applicant is responsible for 25% of the cost to design and install the traffic signal at the intersection of Madison Street and Avenue 58. Applicant shall bond for 25% of the traffic signal. B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Streets "A" through "I" — Construct internal streets per the approved layout shown on the tentative map and/or as approved by the City Engineer. Private Residential Streets shall have a minimum 40-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side, and 24 feet (24')if on -street parking is prohibited and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 1107 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 9 of 26 2) The location of driveways of corner lots shall not be located within the curb return and away from the intersection when possible. 25. The main gated entry on Madison Street shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length of 62 feet from call box to the street; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -accepted vehicles. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall submit a detailed exhibit at a scale of 1" = 10', demonstrating that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turnaround out onto the main street from the gated entry. Pursuant to said condition, there shall be a minimum of 25 feet of width provided at the turnaround opening. Two (2) lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry; one (1) lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one (1) lane for visitors. The two (2) travel lanes shall be a minimum of 20 feet of total paved roadway surface or as approved by the Fire Department. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 26. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Collector 4.0" a.c /5.0" c.a.b. Secondary Arterial 4.0" a.c./6.0" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 27. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six (6) months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six (6) months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current 1108 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 10 of 26 production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. 28. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: A. Madison Street (Primary Entry): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. B. Madison Street (Golf Course Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. C. Madison Street (Emergency Access): Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. D. Madison Street (just south of Avenue 58): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. E. Avenue 60 (South Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. F. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Westerly Access): Full turn movements in and out are allowed. G. Avenue 58 (Future Commercial Easterly Access): Right turn -in and right turn -out are permitted. Left turn -in and left turn -out movements are prohibited. 29. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 30. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. 31. Standard knuckles and corner cut -backs shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #801 and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 32. The design of parking facilities shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and, in particular, the following: A. The parking stall and aisle widths and the double hairpin stripe parking stall design shall conform to LQMC Chapter 9.150. 1109 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 11 of 26 B. Cross slopes should be a maximum of 2% where ADA accessibility is required, including accessibility routes between buildings. C. Building access points shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plans so that ADA accessibility issues can be evaluated. D. Accessibility routes to public streets and adjacent development shall be shown on the Precise Grading Plan. E. Parking space lengths shall be according to LQMC Chapter 9.150 and be a minimum of 17 feet in length with a 2-foot overhang for standard parking stalls and 18 feet with a 2-foot overhang for accessible parking spaces or as approved by the City Engineer. One (1) van -accessible handicapped parking stall is required per eight (8) handicapped parking stalls. F. Drive aisles between parking spaces shall be a minimum of 26 feet or as approved by the City Engineer. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes, ADA accessibility route to public streets, and other features shown on the approved construction plans may require additional street widths and other improvements as may be determined by the City Engineer. 33. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Parking Lot & Aisles (Low Traffic) 3.0" a.c./4.5" c.a.b. Parking Lot & Aisles (High Traffic) 4.5" a.c./5.5" c.a.b. Loading Areas 6" P.C.C./4" c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 34. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete, and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent aggregate gradation test results (less than six months old at the time of construction) confirming that the design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until the mix designs are approved. 1110 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 12 of 26 35. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings, and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs, and sidewalks. 36. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates, and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by engineers registered in California. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect" refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 37. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans). 38. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Public Works Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized in writing by the City Engineer. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. On -Site Mass Grading Plan 1" = 100' Horizontal B. On -Site Rough Grading Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal C. PM10 Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal D. Erosion Control Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal E. Hydrology Report (Plan submitted in Report Form) F. Final WQMP (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through F to be submitted concurrently. G. Off -Site Street Improvement/Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal, 1" = 4' Vertical PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 13 of 26 H. Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal I. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1 " = 40' Horizontal, 1 "= 4' Vertical J. Storm Drain Plan 1" = 40' Horizontal NOTE: G through H to be submitted concurrently The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the Public Works Director. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note that the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. K. On -Site Precise Grading Plan 1" = 30' Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formats approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200 feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No Parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrants), and Street Name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Engineering Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of 1-foot (1') of cover or as established in the structural calculations and details, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. "On -Site Precise Grading" plans shall normally include all on -site surface improvements, including but not limited to finish grades for curbs & gutters, building floor elevations, wall elevations, parking lot improvements, and accessibility requirements. 1112 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 14 of 26 39. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets, and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Department at the City website (www.lag uintaca.gov). Please navigate to the Public Works Department home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 40. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved plans previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer of Record (EOR) during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the FOR may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of Record Drawing submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 41. Prior to constructing any off -site improvements, the applicant shall deposit securities equivalent to both a Performance and Labor & Material Bond each valued at 100% of the cost of the off -site improvements, or as approved by the City Engineer. 42. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 43. When improvements are phased through a "Phasing Plan," or an administrative approval (e.g., Site Development Permits), all off -site improvements and common on -site improvements (e.g., backbone utilities, retention basins, perimeter walls, landscaping and gates) shall be constructed, or secured, prior to the issuance of any permits in the first phase of the development, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Improvements and obligations required of each subsequent phase shall either be completed or secured prior to the completion of homes or the occupancy of permanent buildings within such latter phase, or as otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 1113 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 15 of 26 In the event the applicant fails to construct the improvements for the development, or fails to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, pursuant to the approved phasing plan, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of all permits, and/or final inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. 44. Depending on the timing of the development of the Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of the Tentative Tract Map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first -priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 40t" Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit(s) related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 45. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off - site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable TV improvements. 46. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, 1114 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 16 of 26 withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. r,RAnINr, 47. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements). 48. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 49. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a Civil Engineer registered in the State of California, B. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by a professional registered in the State of California, C. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and D. An Erosion Control Plan showing Best Management Practices prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). E. A Final WQMP prepared by an authorized professional registered in the State of California. F. A grading bond in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the grading bond requirements. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by a Soils Engineer, or Engineering Geologist registered in the State of California. The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish the security if it is expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 1115 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 17 of 26 50. The applicant shall maintain all open graded, undeveloped land in order to prevent wind and/or water erosion of such land. All open graded, undeveloped land shall either be planted with interim landscaping or stabilized with such other erosion control measures as were approved in the Fugitive Dust Control Plan. 51. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e., the slope at the back of the landscape lot), which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six feet (6') adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6') of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right-of-way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half inches (1.5") in the first 18 inches behind the curb. 52. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. 53. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more than one foot (1') higher from the building pads in adjacent developments. Where compliance within the above -stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties, and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 54. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (05) from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 55. Prior to the issuance of a building permit(s) for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation, and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. 1116 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 18 of 26 nRAINAC;F 56. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for Tract Map No. 39058, Coral Mountain Project (TTM2025-0001), or as approved by the City Engineer. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 57. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on -site during the 100- year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1-hour, 3-hour, 6-hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total runoff. 58. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 59. In the design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches (2") per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero (0) unless the applicant provides site -specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 60. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 61. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Community Development Director and the City Engineer. 62. For on -site above -ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 — Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance -free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 63. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation that directly falls onto the setback) 1117 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 19 of 26 will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 64. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 65. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 66. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 67. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2009-0009-DWQ and Order No. 2010-0014-DWQ.. For post -construction urban runoff from New Development and Redevelopment Projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction, and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board — Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. 2. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project -specific WQMP shall be provided, which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. 3. The developer/owner shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. 1118 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 20 of 26 I ITII ITIF.0, 68. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 69. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures, including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 70. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to, the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 71. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained or required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located so as not to conflict with access aisles/entrances. CONSTRUCTION 72. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings, and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 73. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 74. The applicant shall provide landscaping in the required setbacks, retention basins, and common lots. 1119 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 21 of 26 75. All new landscape areas shall have landscaping and permanent irrigation improvements in compliance with the City's Water Efficient Landscape regulations contained in LQMC Section 8.13 (Water Efficient Landscape). 76. The applicant shall submit the final landscape plans for review, processing, and approval to the Design and Development Department, in accordance with the Final Landscape Plan application process. Planning Manager approval of the final landscape plans is required prior to issuance of the first building permit unless the Planning Manager determines extenuating circumstances exist that justify an alternative processing schedule. NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until they have been signed by the appropriate City official, including the Planning Manager and/or City Engineer. 77. The applicant or their agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 5th Edition" or latest, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 78. Prior to final approval of the installation of landscaping, the Landscape Architect of record shall provide the Design and Development Department a letter stating they have personally inspected the installation and that it conforms with the Final Landscaping Plans as approved by the City. 79. If staff determines during final landscaping inspection that adjustments are required in order to meet the intent of the Planning Commission's approval, the Planning Manager shall review and approve any such revisions to the landscape plan. MAINTENANCE 80. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 81. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, multi -use trail, and stormwater BMPs. 1120 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 22 of 26 FEES AND DEPOSITS 82. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Development Impact Fee and Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 83. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect at the time the applicant submits an application for plan check and permits. PLANNING AND ENVIRONMENTAL 84. The access driveway onto Madison Street shall be permanently closed, paving removed, and landscaping installed within 60 days of the completion of the main project entry. 85. The improvements on the site will be removed within 60 days of the sale of the last lot within the project. Prior to removal, the developer shall provide the City with a site restoration plan (if being returned to native condition) or a Site Development Permit (if proposed for alternative use) for review and approval. 86. Prior to any ground disturbance on any portion of the site, the developer shall provide the City with: a. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating compliance with burrowing owl and nesting bird requirements. b. Letter from a qualified biologist demonstrating completion of 2025 bat surveys, and results (presence or absence) of same. c. Letter from a qualified historian demonstrating the correct installation of fencing surrounding the adobe. d. Letters from a qualified archaeologist and Agua Caliente Band of Cahuilla Indians (ACBCI) Tribal Historic Preservation Officer confirming that all remediation, data recovery, and mitigation of identified sites and resources have been completed to their satisfaction. e. Letter(s) from ACBCI approving the Archaeological Treatment, Disposition and Monitoring Plan and the Rock Art Management Plan, with a copy of the approved plan attached. 1121 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 23 of 26 f. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified archaeologist and ACBCI for all ground disturbing activities. g. Signed monitoring agreements with a qualified biologist and noise engineer. 87. All construction plans to include in their notes: a. Paving installation activity shall not overlap with the architectural coating (building painting) activity. b. The contractor shall adhere to applicable measures contained in Table 1 of Rule 403, including, but not limited to: • All clearing, grading, earth -moving, or excavation activities shall cease when winds exceed 25 mph per SCAQMD guidelines in order to limit fugitive dust emissions. • The contractor shall ensure that all disturbed unpaved roads and disturbed areas within the project are watered at least three (3) times daily during dry weather. Watering, with complete coverage of disturbed areas, shall occur at least three (3) times a day, preferably in the mid -morning, afternoon, and after work is done for the day. • The contractor shall ensure that traffic speeds on unpaved roads and project site areas are limited to 15 miles per hour or less. c. The following measures shall be incorporated into project plans and specifications as implementation of SCAQMD Rule 1113 (3): • Only "Low -Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC)" paints (no more than 50 grams/liter (g/L) of VOC) consistent with SCAQMD Rule 1113 shall be used. BACM AQ-3: The project is required to comply with SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the use of wood -burning stoves and fireplaces in new development. 88. Burrowing owl surveys shall be performed by a qualified biologist, approved by the City, prior to any site disturbance activities. A minimum of two surveys, occurring at least three (3) weeks apart, shall be completed in advance of any site disturbance activities. If disturbance activities are expected to start during the burrowing owl breeding season, three (3) surveys shall be completed. The final burrowing owl survey shall be completed within three (3) days prior to initiation of any site disturbance activities. The pre -construction survey shall be conducted in accordance with accepted protocol and the requirements specified in the CVMSHCP. Prior to construction, a qualified biologist will survey the construction area and an area up to 500 feet outside the project limits for burrows that could be 1122 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 24 of 26 used by burrowing owls. If the burrow is determined to be occupied, the burrow will be flagged, and a 160-foot diameter buffer will be established during the non - breeding season or a 250-foot diameter buffer during the breeding season. The buffer zone area will be staked and marked with flags. No development activities will be permitted within the buffer until the young are no longer dependent on the burrow and have left the burrow. If the burrow is found to be unoccupied, the burrow will be made inaccessible to owls, and construction may proceed. If either a nesting or escape burrow is occupied, owls shall be relocated pursuant to accepted Wildlife Agency protocols. Determination of the appropriate method of relocation, such as eviction/passive relocation or active relocation, shall be based on the specific site conditions (e.g., distance to nearest suitable habitat and presence of burrows within that habitat) in coordination with the Wildlife Agencies. If burrowing owls are observed within the Project site during construction activities, CDFW shall be notified immediately and provided with proposed avoidance and minimization measures, consistent with the requirements of the CVMSHCP. 89. Removal of trees (including palm trees) shall occur outside the bat maternity season (March 15—August 31 in the Coachella Valley), which coincides with the bird nesting season, to avoid the potential for "take" of flightless young. Trees and snags that have been identified as confirmed or potential roost sites require a two- step removal process and the involvement of a bat biologist to ensure that no roosting bats are killed during this activity. Consistent with CDFW protocols this two-step removal shall occur over two (2) consecutive days as follows: on Day 1, branches and limbs not containing cavities, as identified by a qualified bat biologist, will be removed. On Day 2, the remainder of the tree may be removed without supervision by a bat biologist. The disturbance caused by limb removal, followed by an interval of one (1) evening, will allow bats to safely abandon the roost. 90. To avoid impacts to roosting bats from the installation of new light fixtures associated with the proposed development, all lighting fixtures shall have light shields or similar devices (i.e., dark sky compliant lighting) installed to ensure that there is no light trespass onto Coral Mountain and the surrounding open space. A supplemental light study will be performed to collect nighttime lighting measurements and confirm that no light trespass onto Coral Mountain is occurring prior to occupancy of the first housing unit adjacent to Coral Mountain. 91. A qualified bat biologist shall confirm the absence of roosting bats prior to any restoration work or other disturbance of the adobe site. If bats are found or if the absence of bats cannot be confirmed, the bat biologist will install or directly 1123 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 25 of 26 supervise the installation of humane eviction devices and exclusionary material to prevent bats from roosting in the building. Implementation of the humane eviction/exclusions is typically performed in the fall (September or October) preceding construction activity at each structure to avoid impacts to hibernating bats during the winter months or during the maternity season (March 15—August 31 in the Coachella Valley), when nonvolant (flightless) young are present. Any humane eviction/exclusion devices must be installed at least 10 days prior to the demolition of a structure housing bats to allow sufficient time for the bats to vacate the roost(s). 92. To ensure compliance with California Fish and Game Code and the MBTA and to avoid potential impacts to nesting birds, vegetation removal and ground -disturbing activities shall be conducted outside the general bird nesting season. Any vegetation removal, ground disturbance, and/or construction activities that occur during the nesting season will require that all suitable habitats be surveyed for the presence of nesting birds by a qualified biologist who is pre -approved by the CDFW. Prior to commencement of clearing, a qualified biologist shall conduct preconstruction surveys within 14 days and repeated three (3) days prior to ground -disturbing activities. If any active nests are detected, a buffer of 300 feet (500 feet for raptors) around the nest adjacent to construction will be delineated, flagged, and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. During construction activities, the qualified biologist shall continue biological monitoring activities at a frequency recommended by the qualified biologist using their best professional judgment, or as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies. If nesting birds are detected, avoidance and minimization measures may be adjusted and construction activities stopped or redirected by the qualified biologist using their best professional judgment, as otherwise directed by the Wildlife Agencies to avoid "take" of nesting birds. 93. The contractor shall provide the City with cultural sensitivity training attendance sign-up sheets for all construction workers involved in the project, including custom homes. The requirement for cultural sensitivity training shall be included on all building plans. 94. All earth -moving operations reaching beyond the depth of two feet shall be monitored by a qualified paleontological monitor, and continuous monitoring will become necessary if undisturbed, potentially fossiliferous lakebed sediments are encountered. The monitor shall be empowered to stop earth -moving activities if fossils are identified. The monitor shall be prepared to quickly salvage fossils, but must have the power to temporarily halt or divert construction equipment to allow for the removal of abundant or large specimens. 1124 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2025-012 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL — ADOPTED SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0002 (SALES CENTER) PROJECT: CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF AVENUE 58 AND MADISON STREET ADOPTED: OCTOBER 28, 2025 PAGE 26 of 26 A monitoring plan shall be provided to the City prior to the issuance of any earth - moving permit or the disturbance of any soils on the site, which will include: • Samples of sediments shall be collected and processed to recover small fossil remains. • Recovered specimens shall be identified and curated at a repository with permanent retrievable storage that would allow for further research in the future. A report of findings, including an itemized inventory of recovered specimens and a discussion of their significance when appropriate, shall be prepared upon completion of the research procedures outlined above. The report shall be provided to the City within 30 days of the conclusion of monitoring activities. 95. During all project site construction, the construction contractors shall equip all construction equipment, fixed or mobile, with properly operating and maintained mufflers, consistent with manufacturers' standards. The construction contractor shall place all stationary construction equipment so that emitted noise is directed away from the noise -sensitive receptors nearest the project site. 1125 ATTACHMENT 6 PROCOPIO Procopio 200 Spectrum Center Drive Suite 1650 Irvine, CA 92618 T. 949.383.2997 F. 619.235.0398 JAMES D. VAUGHN Partner P. 949.247.7312 James.Vaughn@procopio.com DEL MAR HEIGHTS LAS VEGAS ORANGE COUNTY SCOTTSDALE December 3, 2025 SAN DIEGO SILICON VALLEY VIA E-MAIL WASHINGTON, D.C. City Council City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Applicant's Response to Mary Mann Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of TTM 2025- 0001, SDP 2025-0001, and SDP 2025-0002 Dear Mayor Evans and Honorable Councilmembers: We represent applicant CM Wave Development, LLC ("Applicant") in connection with its Coral Mountain Club project, and on its behalf, we are submitting this response to the above referenced appeal filed by Mary Mann ("Appellant") to the Planning Commission approval of Tentative Tract Map TTM 2025-0001 and Site Development Permits SDP 2025-0001 and 2025-0002 (the "Implementing Approvals"). In short, Appellant's challenge to the Implementing Approvals should be denied because it amounts to an untimely challenge to the previously approved Coral Mountain Club Project (the "Previously Approved Project") and the City Council's prior certification of the Coral Mountain Resort Environmental Impact Report (the "Coral Mountain EIR"). While Appellant asserts numerous objections to various aspects of the Previously Approved Project, including relating to air quality, cultural and tribal cultural resources, visual impacts, recreational and open space resources, hydrology, noise, traffic, public services, biological resources, and cumulative impacts, Appellant has failed to assert, or to support with any substantial evidence, any aspect of the Implementing Approvals that would cause any new or substantially more severe environmental effects than were previously analyzed in the Coral Mountain EIR. Accordingly, Appellant's challenge to the Implementing Approvals should be denied and the Planning Commission's approval of the Implementing Approvals should be reaffirmed as the City's final approval thereof. 134931-00000001/ 10173284.1 procopio.com 1126 9Procopio 1. Applicant has a Vested Right to Develop the Previously Approved Project. The 2024 City Council approvals of the Coral Mountain Club project included a statutory Development Agreement that governs buildout of the Previously Approved Project. Pursuant to Section 2.2 of the Development Agreement, Applicant has "the vested right to develop the Project," including "the permitted land uses, densities, and intensities of use of the Site, timing or phasing of development, zoning, provisions for the reservation and dedication of land for public purposes, and the location and size of public improvements." As long as the Implementing Approvals are consistent with Previously Approved Project, consistent with the General Plan, Specific Plan, and Zoning Code, and comply with the applicable conditions of approval and mitigation measures, Developer has the right to approval of the Implementing Approvals pursuant to its vested rights under the Development Agreement. As expressly found by the Planning Commission, the Implementing Approvals satisfy these basic requirements. See, e.g., Planning Commission Staff Report pp. 11-17 (Resolution 2025-012), and pp. 103-105 (Findings). The appeal and supporting materials submitted by Appellant fail to identify any error in these findings made by the Planning Commission, and fail to identify any aspect of the Implementing Approvals that violate any requirements under the Development Agreement, the conditions of approval, or the City's General Plan or Zoning Ordinance. For example, Appellant raises concerns about the potential for construction impacts concerning dust, traffic, and noise, as well as potential project impacts concerning loss of open space and recreational amenities, water use, and cultural resources, but none of these concerns are based on any proposed changes to the Previously Approved Project reflected in the Implementing Approvals. Rather, they are concerns that stem from the construction activities, development, and land uses previously approved by the City Council in 2024. It is also important to note that all of the concerns now raised by Appellant were thoroughly considered and addressed in the Coral Mountain EIR and the 2024 project approvals. For example, the impacts to cultural, archaeological, and tribal resources raised on page 4 of the appeal were thoroughly addressed in the 2024 project approvals. As explained in the 2024 CEQA Findings, the rock art and other sensitive tribal cultural resources will be protected through implementation of Mitigation Measures CUL-2 through CUL-5, which were developed in consultation with the Agua Caliente Tribal Historic Preservation Office. See 2024 CEQA Findings at pp. 46-50, and pp. 74- 80. Appellant has failed to identify anything in the Implementing Approvals that conflict with these Mitigation Measures or that would cause any impacts not fully addressed in the Coral Mountain EIR. 2. Appellant's Challenges to the Adequacy of the CEQA Review is Barred by the Statute of Limitations. The law is well -established that once an EIR has been certified for a development project, the public agency's role under CEQA is generally complete and, unless a successful challenge to that EIR is timely filed, the certified EIR is conclusively presumed to be valid. See Public Resources Code §21167.2; CEQA Guidelines § 15231; and Friends of College of San Mateo Gardens v. San Mateo County Community College Dist. (2016) 1 Cal.5th 937, 945. As explained by the California Supreme Court, "[t]he limitations period starts running on the date the project is approved by the public agency and is not retriggered on each subsequent date that the public agency takes some action 134931-00000001/ 10173284.1 2 procopio.com 1127 IoProcopio toward implementing the project." Id. Once the statute of limitations has expired, "any challenges under CEQA to later approvals or to changes in the project are limited to the legality of the agency's decision about whether to require a subsequent or supplemental EIR, or subsequent negative declaration, and the underlying EIR or negative declaration may not be attacked." Gurrero v. City of Los Angeles (2024) 98 Cal.App.5th 1087, 1105-06. Moreover, "this limitation applies even if the original [CEQA document] was invalid or in some way defective." Id. Here, all of Appellant's CEQA-related claims amount to untimely challenges to the environmental analysis and conclusions of the previously certified Coral Mountain EIR, rather than any assertion that any project change in the 2025 Implementing Approvals will cause any new or substantially more severe environmental effects than previously analyzed. This includes Appellant's claims that the Project will have construction related dust and traffic impacts (Appeal, pp. 1-2 and p. 6), impacts to cultural and Tribal cultural resources (Appeal p. 4), impacts to recreational/open space resources and visual impacts (Appeal pp. 4 and 5), impacts to water supplies and hydrology (Appeal p. 5), and cumulative impacts (Appeal pp. 5-6). None of the issues raised in the Appeal challenge any aspect of the Implementing Approvals that was not already considered and approved in connection with the 2024 Project approvals. Simply put, the time for Appellant to raise her concerns and CEQA compliance arguments was in 2023 and 2024 when the Coral Mountain Club project underwent thorough CEQA review and public hearings. Appellant's claims are now plainly time barred under Public Resources Code §§ 21167 and 21167.2. 3. The Implementing Approvals are Exempt from Further CEQA Review Under Government Code Section 65457. Under Government Code § 65457, any residential development project that is consistent with a specific plan for which an EIR was certified after January 1, 1980, is exempt from further review under CEQA unless a Subsequent EIR or Supplemental EIR is triggered under Public Resources Code § 21166 (meaning that the project approvals under consideration would have a new or substantially more severe environmental effect than previously considered). See, e.g., Concerned Citizens v. City of Dublin (2013) 214 Cal.App.41h 1301; Citizens' Committee to Complete the Refuge v. City of Newark (2022) 74 Cal.App.Sth 460; and Save Livermore Downtown v. City of Livermore (2023) 87 Cal.App.Sth 1116. As explained in these cases, the CEQA exemption for residential projects under Government Code § 65457 reflects a legislative policy decision to promote finality, prioritize housing supply, and avoid duplication of environmental review for residential projects that have already undergone environmental review under a certified EIR. That is exactly the situation here, where Appellant seeks to "relitigate" all of the alleged environmental effects of the Previously Approved Project that were already thoroughly analyzed and mitigated to the maximum extent feasible in the Coral Mountain EIR and the related 2024 approvals. Appellant has made no showing whatsoever that the Implementing Approvals or the circumstances surrounding the Coral Mountain Club project have changed in any material way that could even conceivably have new or substantially more severe environmental effects. Accordingly, Appellant's claims that the Implementing Approvals warrant further environmental review under CEQA is barred by Government Code § 65457. 134931-00000001/ 10173284.1 3 procopio.com 1128 [gflProcopio 4. Appellant's General Plan and Zoning Consistency Claims Are Likewise Devoid of Any Merit. Appellant's claims regarding General Plan and Zoning Consistency also amount to untimely objections to the Previously Approved Project. For example, Appellant asserts that the project is inconsistent with the General Plan policies "regarding neighborhood character, open space preservation, and compatibility of scale and density." (Appeal, p. 3). This claim appears to be based on objections to the project's addition of residential and golf course uses (including in combination with other development in the Coral Mountain area), the perimeter walls/sheep fencing and their interference with access to the adjacent and nearby recreational amenities, and water use (see Appeal, pp. 3-4, and attached Desert Sun articles, Los Angeles Times article re water use, and public comments at prior public hearings). All of these issues were fully addressed in the Coral Mountain EIR and the public hearings concerning the Previously Approved Project. Moreover, Appellant has failed to identify any aspect of the Implementing Approvals currently under consideration that would have any new, different, or more severe effects relating to these topics. As discussed in the Planning Commission Staff Report and attachments, the Implementing Approvals include a tentative tract map and two site development permits that were contemplated when the Coral Mountain EIR was certified and the Previously Approved Project was approved by the City Council in 2024. These Implementing Approvals do not propose any project changes that affect the perimeter walls and sheep fence or the trail along the base of Coral Mountain. Furthermore, the Implementing Approvals do not increase the number of residential units or the amount of golf or other approved development or uses, nor do they move these approved uses any closer to Coral Mountain or any adjacent properties. In short, nothing in the Implementing Approvals increases the density or intensity of approved uses or otherwise increases the intensity of any potential environmental effects. Rather, Appellant's claims amount to an untimely objection to the Previously Approved Project. As discussed above, the time to raise these issues was prior to approval of the Previously Approved Project in 2024. 5. Conclusion. The City Council approved the Coral Mountain Club project in 2024, and at that time, the City Council considered all of the issues now raised by Appellant. Nothing material has changed since those 2024 approvals with respect to the project or the surrounding circumstances. The Coral Mountain Club project has been thoroughly analyzed and vetted with respect to environmental impacts and consistency with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance, and the City Council already weighed the relevant policy issues and voted to approve the Coral Mountain Club project (including a General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment and certification of the Coral Mountain EIR). There is simply no basis in policy or the law to revisit those approvals now with the present Implementing Approvals. For these reasons the appeal of the Planning Commission approval of the Implementing Approvals should be denied. 134931-00000001/ 10173284.1 4 procopio.com 1129 IoProcopio We intend to be present at the City Council hearing on the Appeal on December 16, 2025, and we would be glad to address any questions the City Councilmembers may have at that time. Very truly yours, James D. Vaughn Partner, of Procopio, Cory, Hargreaves & Savitch LLP cc: Monika Radeva, City Clerk Cheri Flores, Interim Design and Development Director Nicole Criste, Consulting Planner 134931-00000001/ 10173284.1 5 procopio.com 1130 ATTACHMENT 7 MBGD, LLC 23622 Calabasas Road, Suite 200 Calabasas, CA 91302 Lot #84M B397-034TR31681-2 December 10, 2025 City of La Quinta City Council 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Public Hearing — December 16, 2025 Appeal 2025-0001 To whom it may concern: As a property owner in the area, we are in favor of the development at the SW corner of 58 and Madison Street. We hope that the City Council does not overturn the already approved plan by the Planning Commission. Sincerely, David Leff 1131 1132 REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 33 ARTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 CALL TO ORDER A regular quarterly meeting of the Arts and Community Services Commission (Commission) was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by Vice Chair Chiapperini. PRESENT: Commissioners Beesemyer, Brower, Webb, and Vice ChairpChiapperini ABSENT: Chairperson Biondi PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Beesemeyer led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA — None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA — Confirmed ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS — None CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 1. RECEIVE AND FILE MEETING MINUTES DATED JUNE 9, 2025 MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Beesemeyer/Brower to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion passed: ayes — 4, noes — 0, abstain — 0, absent — 1 (Biondi). BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPOINT MEMBERS OF THE ARTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION TO SERVE AS CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 The Commission waived presentation of the staff report, which is on file in the Community Services Department. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Webb/Beesemeyer to appoint Vice Chairperson Chiapperini to serve as Chairperson for fiscal year 2025/26. Motion passed: ayes — 4, noes — 0, abstain — 0, absent — 1 (Biondi). ARTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION Page 1 of 4 SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 QUARTERLY MINUTES 1133 MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Vice Chairperson Chiapperini /Commissioner Beesemeyer to appoint Commissioner Webb to serve as Vice Chairperson for fiscal year 2025/26. Motion passed: ayes — 4, noes — 0, abstain — 0, absent — 1 (Biondi). 2. APPOINT MEMBERS OF THE ARTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION TO SERVE ON THE NOVEMBER 2025 AND MARCH 2O26 CIVIC CENTER ART SELECTION COMMITTEE The Commission waived presentation of the staff report, which is on file in the Community Services Department. The Commission discussed Commissioners Webb and Chiapperini served on the Civic Center Art Selection Committee, and concurred Commissioners Beesemeyer and Brower will serve on the upcoming committees. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Webb/Chiapperini to appoint Commissioners Beesemeyer and Brower to serve on the November 2025 and March 2026 Civic Center Art Selection Committee. Motion passed: ayes — 4, noes — 0, abstain — 0, absent — 1 (Biondi). 3. RECOMMEND COUNCIL APPROVAL OF COMMUNITY SERVICES AWARD NOMINEE VICE CHAIRPERSON CHIAPPERINI RECUSED HIMSELF FROM PARTICIPATING IN THE DISCUSSION AND VOTE ON BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 3 DUE TO A POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST STEMMING FROM A PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WITH THE NOMINEE UNDER CONSIDERATION AND LEFT THE DAIS AT 4:05 P.M. COMMISSIONER WEBB ASSUMED PRESIDING OFFICER RESPONSIBILITIES FROM VICE CHAIRPERSON CHIAPPERINI FOR THIS ITEM Management Analyst Calderon presented the staff report, which is on file in the Community Services Department. The Commission discussed the accomplishments of proposed nominee Tomm Belanich, highlighting his notable contributions as a volunteer, mentor, and advocate; and expressed support for recommending Council approval of his nomination for the Community Servies Award. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Brower/Beesemeyer to recommend Council approval of Community Services Award Nominee Tomm Belanich. Motion passed: ayes — 3, noes — 0, abstain — 0, absent — 2 (Biondi and Chiapperini). ARTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION Page 2 of 4 SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 QUARTERLY MINUTES 1134 VICE CHAIRPERSON CHIAPPERINI RETURNED TO THE DAIS AT 4:11 P.M. AND RESUMED PRESIDING OFFICER RESPONSIBILITIES FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING 4. RECOMMEND COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ARTIST(S) FOR SILVERROCK PARK MURAL Management Analyst Calderon presented the staff report, which is on file in the Community Services Department. The Commission discussed the advantages of recommending one artist for the design of the entire building to ensure continuity of the design, and emphasized the importance of a cohesive mural for the single facility; and reached a consensus to recommend Council approval of artist John Cuevas, noting his ability to reflect the desert environment and multitude of artistic contributions throughout the Coachella Valley. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Webb/Brower to recommend Council approval of artist John Cuevas for the SilverRock Park Mural. Motion passed: ayes — 4, noes — 0, abstain — 0, absent — 1 (Biondi). STUDY SESSION — None DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS — Verbal Updates 1. CITY EVENTS CALENDAR Staff provided an overview of recent and upcoming City events including the Captain Hunter Lopez Lightsaber Vigil, the 9/11 Candlelight Vigil, the inaugural La Quinta Fall Festival which will feature a live band, food trucks, children's activities and a photo booth. Staff also highlighted the upcoming Veterans Recognition Ceremony, Tree Lighting Ceremony, and Ironman 70.3 La Quinta triathlon routes, potential traffic impacts and related community outreach. The Commission discussed incorporating the Read with Me Program at the La Quinta Fall Festival and the promotion of City events through the website, social media, and the City's notification subscription, Quail Mail. 2. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES UPDATES Staff provided updates on several Art in Public Places (APP) initiatives, including the City Hall mural by artist Nate Frizzell scheduled to begin in January 2026, 64 artworks from the City's APP collection were added to the Public Art Archive website, and 10 artworks were loaned to the Coachella Valley Rescue Mission with plaques and QR codes for public engagement. ARTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION Page 3 of 4 SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 QUARTERLY MINUTES 1135 The Commission commended these efforts for enhancing visibility and community connection. 3. LA QUINTA YOUTH COLLECTIVE UPDATE Staff noted Council approved the La Quinta Youth Collective on May 20, 2025, applications are currently being accepted, and it is scheduled to launch in October 2025. The program is open to students who are La Quinta residents or attend a high school in La Quinta and aims to connect youth with local government and community opportunities. 4. FRITZ BURNS PARK IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2021-02 Staff provided updates on the Fritz Bruns Park (Park) Improvements Project noting planned enhancements to the playground, entryway improvements, expanded parking and pool area renovations. Pool programs will be relocated to the Pawly Pool Family Aquatic Complex in Indio from November 2025 to May 2026 during the project construction. The Commission discussed parking demands at the Park and commended the City for the planned parking improvements. 5. COMMISSION MEETING SCHEDULE FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 Staff confirmed the regular quarterly meetings of the Commission are scheduled for December 8, 2025, March 9, 2026, and June 8, 2026, with special meetings to be scheduled as needed. COMMISSIONERS' ITEMS — None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Beesemeyer/Webb to adjourn this meeting at 4:32 p.m. Motion passed: ayes — 4, noes — 0, abstain — 0, absent — 1 (Biondi). Respectfully submitted, Amanda Guerrero, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California ARTS AND COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION Page 4 of 4 SEPTEMBER 8, 2025 QUARTERLY MINUTES 1136 REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 34 HOUSING COMMISSION MINUTES WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 10, 2025 CALL TO ORDER A regular quarterly meeting of the La Quinta Housing Commission (Commission) was called to order at 5:00 p.m. by Chair Gaeta-Mejia. PRESENT: Commissioners Lewis, Pacheco, Paltin, and Chair Gaeta-Mejia ABSENT: Commissioner Christopherson PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Chairperson Gaeta-Mejia led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA — None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Staff requested to move up Departmental Reports Item No. 2, related to City Boards and Commissions overview of roles and responsibilities and public meetings laws after Announcements, Presentations and Written Communications section of the Agenda. The Commission concurred. ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS 1. INTRODUCE NEWLY APPOINTED COMMISSIONER LEWIS Newly appointed Commissioner Lewis provided a brief summary of his experience and qualifications; Commissioners Pacheco, Paltin, and Chair Gaeta-Mejia welcomed Commissioner Lewis. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS — Verbal Updates >>> taken out of Agenda Order as announced during Confirmation of Agenda above. 2. CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS — OVERVIEW OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES, AND PUBLIC MEETINGS LAWS (RALPH M. BROWN ACT, GOV. CODE § 54950 et seq.) Deputy City Clerk Mojica provided a detailed overview of the City of La Quinta Rules of Procedure for Boards and Commissions (Council Resolution 2022-028), Personnel Policy (Council Resolution 2019-027), La Quinta Municipal Code, and the Ralph M. Brown Act (Brown Act); all meetings shall be open and public; agenda posting requirements; 1137 compliance with the Brown Act; best practices; and the Commission's roles, responsibilities, and scope of purview. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. RECEIVE AND FILE MEETING MINUTES DATED JUNE 11, 2025 MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Paltin/Pacheco to receive and file the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion passed: ayes — 4, noes — 0, abstain — 0, absent — 1 (Christopherson). BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPOINT MEMBERS OF THE HOUSING COMMISSION TO SERVE AS CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 Management Specialist McGinley presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Paltin/Lewis to re- appoint Chairperson Gaeta-Mejia to serve as Chairperson for fiscal year 2025/26. Motion passed: ayes — 4, noes — 0, abstain — 0, absent — 1 (Christopherson). MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Chairperosn Gaeta-Mejia/ Commissioner Paltin to appoint Commissioner Pacheco to serve as Vice Chairperson for fiscal year 2025/26. Motion passed: ayes — 4, noes — 0, abstain — 0, absent — 1 (Christopherson). STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSS FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS Senior Management Analyst Kinley presented the staff report, which is on file in the Clerk's Office. The Commission discussed the Commission's ability to review architectural plans and renderings for future affordable housing development projects; the timeline and potential uses for the vacant parcel at the southeast corner of Dune Palms Road and Westward Ho Drive, adjacent to the La Quinta X-Park; traffic circulation for future affordable housing developments staying consistent with the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan traffic analysis; anticipated income categories for future affordable housing units; potential incentives related to reducing parking requirements; building setbacks; and the application process for affordable housing development. 1138 DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS — Verbal Updates 1. FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 CITY EVENTS LINEUP Senior Management Analyst Calderon provided an overview of the City's upcoming events, including the 9/11 Candlelight Vigil, the inaugural La Quinta Fall Festival on October 17, 2025, at La Quinta Park, which will feature a live band, food trucks, children's activities, and a photo booth. Staff also provided details on the Veteran's Recognition Ceremony slated for November 11, 2025, the Tree Lighting Ceremony on December 5, 2025, the Ironman 70.3 La Quinta triathlon on December 7, 2025, and the Holiday Open House which will be announced in the coming weeks, and encouraged the Commissioners to attend. 2. Moved up by Staff and presented after Announcements, Presentations, and Written Communications section of the agenda >>> CITY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS — OVERVIEW OF ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES, AND PUBLIC MEETINGS LAWS (RALPH M. BROWN ACT, GOV. CODE § 54950 et seq.) COMMISSIONERS' ITEMS — None ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, a motion was made and seconded by Chair Gaeta- Mejia/Commissioner Paltin to adjourn the meeting at 5:42 p.m. Motion passed: ayes — 4, noes — 0, abstain — 0, absent — 1 (Christopherson). Respectfully submitted, Laurie McGinley, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California 1139 1140 REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEM NO. 35 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 5, 2025 CALL TO ORDER A special meeting of the La Quinta Financial Advisory Commission (Commission) was called to order at 3.30 p.m. by Chair Dorsey. PRESENT: Commissioners Anderson, Kiehl, Lee, Mast, Niblo, Way and Chair Dorsey ABSENT: None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Commissioner Way led the audience in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA — None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed ANNOUNCEMENTS, PRESENTATIONS, AND WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS - None CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS 1. RECEIVE AND FILE SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES DATED SEPTEMBER 11, 2025 2. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED APRIL 30, 2025 3. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED J U LY 31, 2025 4. RECEIVE AND FILE REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT DATED AUGUST 31, 2025 MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Way/Anderson to approve the Consent Calendar as presented. Motion passed unanimously. BUSINESS SESSION 1. APPOINT MEMBERS OF THE FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION TO SERVE AS CHAIRPERSON AND VICE CHAIRPERSON FOR FISCAL YEAR 2025/26 FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION Page 1 of 3 NOVEMBER 5, 2025 SPECIAL MEETING — MINUTES 1141 Principal Management Analyst Hallick presented the staff report, which is on file with the Finance Department. Commissioners discussed their individual willingness and availability to serve in either capacity; the importance of providing Commissioners with the opportunity to serve in leadership positions; and their respective appointments term expirations. Commissioner Way, Vice Chair Anderson, and Chair Dorsey expressed willingness to serve as Chairperson or Vice Chairperson. The Commission reached a consensus to appoint Commissioner Way and Vice Chair Anderson to serve as Chairperson and Vice Chairperson, respectively. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Kiehl/Lee to appoint Commissioner Way to serve as Chairperson for fiscal year 2025/26. Motion passed unanimously. MOTION — A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Kiehl/Dorsey to re- appoint Vice Chairperson Anderson to serve as Vice Chairperson for fiscal year 2025/26. Motion passed unanimously. OUTGOING CHAIRPERSON DORSEY TURNED OVER PRESIDING OFFICER DUTIES TO NEWLY APPOINTMENT CHAIRPERSON WAY FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE MEETING STUDY SESSION — None DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS 1. FINANCE DEPARTMENT CURRENT AND FUTURE INITIATIVES Staff provided updates on current and upcoming Finance Department initiatives, noting preparations for the Annual Comprehensive Financial Report (ACFR) for fiscal year (FY) 2024/25, and currently ongoing Measure A Local Streets and Road Audit for FY 2024/25 are in progress; the Measure G Sales Tax Oversight Compliance Subcommittee Compliance Report is scheduled to be presented at the December Commission meeting; the upcoming California Society of Municipal Finance Officers (CSMFO) Annual Conference will be held at the Palm Springs Convention Center; Finance Director Martinez and Principal Management Analyst Hallick will serve as presenters at CSMFO. Staff encouraged Commissioners' participation at the CSMFO conference which could feature topics such as fraud control, cyber security, accounts payable, payroll, pension liability and investment management. Staff noted major Citywide updates, including the ongoing bankruptcy proceedings for the SilverRock (formerly Talus) project, continued work on the Highway 111 Corridor Specific Plan, and the Federal Emergency Management Assistance funding related to expenses incurred due to tropical storm Hilary were being finalized. The Commission expressed interest in receiving a detailed update from the Planning Department and recognized FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION Page 2 of 3 NOVEMBER 5, 2025 SPECIAL MEETING — MINUTES 1142 successful completion of the roadway and landscaping improvements along Highway 111. Staff provided reminders regarding upcoming City events, including the Veterans Recognition Ceremony and the La Quinta Arts Celebration. 2. SALES TAX UPDATE — SECOND QUARTER 2025 (APRIL - JUNE) Staff provided an update on second quarter 2025 sales tax and Measure G revenues, noting continued growth across major industries, and identifying new and one-time vendors featured among the City's top 25 revenue -generating businesses and increased county pool revenue. The Commission discussed current economic trends and consumer spending patterns. The Commission commended staff for the timely completion of the City's FY 2024/25 Comprehensive Audit; noting the Finance team successfully coordinated virtually with the City's firm Lance Soll & Lunghard, LLP (LSL), and that the audit partner was onsite in person for one day during the audit. COMMISSIONERS' ITEMS Commissioner Anderson provided observations regarding interest allocation trends and gas tax revenues. Staff reported that market conditions will continue to be closely monitored following the Federal Reserve's October rate cut, but see no changes in the overall approach to the City's investment portfolio. The Commission discussed travel trends, anticipated impacts of seasonal tourism across the Coachella Valley, upcoming CSFMO conference sessions and expressed appreciation to outgoing Chair Dorsey for his leadership over the past year. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Dorsey/Kiehl to adjourn this meeting at 4.21 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. Respectfully submitted, Amanda Guerrero, Commission Secretary City of La Quinta, California FINANCIAL ADVISORY COMMISSION Page 3 of 3 NOVEMBER 5, 2025 SPECIAL MEETING — MINUTES 1143 1144 WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 16, 2025 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 16, 2025 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENTS PHYLLIS KIRK & JOAN SANKA PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - INSTALLING STREET LIGHT AT CALLE TAMPICO & SEASONS WAY Request for a New Streetlight We have a strong concern about a very dark corner near our homes, and we ask La Quinta City Council to put a new streetlight on that corner. The dangerous area is the North West corner where Seasons Way turns off of Calle Tampico. � CE rt-c� &V L e d D w --- The Senior complex of 100 apartments on that corner has 3 pedestrian gates that open onto Calle Tampico and Seasons Way. ----- This is a major intersection that's especially busy because of all the events in City Park, the LaQuinta Library and Old Town. --- There's a large residential community of families that use Seasons Way to access Calle Tampico. Children and adults from that area use that corner to go to and from the park, to walk dogs, to walk to Grocery Outlet and Starbucks, and to Old Town. ------ Once the sun goes down, that North East corner is completely dark as early as 5 in the afternoon. (The light on the North West corner is designed to light a parking lot and is set far enough back from the corner that its light does not reach the dark North East corner.) All these conditions create an accident waiting to happen. We ask that the City Council take action to place a new streetlight at this location. Please send us feedback on the progress of this request. Respectfully submitted, December,] 2025 .r— Phyllis Kirk JD �2 Joan-Sanka �JENoNs A T- LK C,, u I Ir6 -D !Sc:ti10K)cS> AL L Greetings City Council My compliments on the lights and decoration at Civic Park. People of all ages are enjoying it and their little dogs too. The lights brighten up everything. That is why I too am here to str s t e nee light at a Very Dark but busy corn at Seasons way and Calle Tampico. People walk, an ride bikes all the way from Eisenhower to Washington on Calle Tampico and have to cross at that corner. It includes Stores, Markets, Schools and a Hotel Lets make it a safe place. Lets Make it so Residents and Visitors can BE SEEN. Besides a Street light, May I suggest that the white line at that STOP SIGN be repainted in the white reflective paint that was used on La Fonda Each night I headed home from the Voting Center at City Hall, what a relief to have the bright white Reflective stripe showing the way. Also, I would like to see the Stripes on the Road Way by the Pedestrian Crosswalk be given a coat of fresh reflective paint. appreciate the Crosswalk has flashing lights BUT. Lets give Motorist a Heads Up to slow down as approaching a busy path that leads to and from a Bus Stop, The Park, the Library and City Hall and Old Town and Shopping. Time to refresh the Stripes on the Roads. I know La Quinta appreciates a Dark Sky, but please not on a main throughfare. Thank You for Your Time and Attention to this matter. Happy Holiday ���:� CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 16, 2025 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT ANNE O'BRIEN PUBLIC COMMENT ON MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA - REGARDING USE OF E-BIKES ON TRAILS & SAFETY From: Anne O'Brien City of Residence: La Quinta, California Subject Matter: New York Times Article on E- bike Safety Link to Article dated November 30, 2025 titled "The Shocking Crash That Led One County to Reckon With The Dangers of E-Bikes" https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11 /30/magazine/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation- california.html?smid=nvtcore-ios-share We at Friends of the Bear Creek feel the above article may be extremely helpful to Council and Staff as they consider plans to ensure safety on our own popular multi -use trail. The city of La Quinta, like the City of Sausalito in Marin County, strives to ensure the safety of both residents and tourists. Marin's network of shared trails have been plagued by multiple accidents, including two fatalities caused by e-bikes hitting pedestrians on multi use trails as well as one horrific injury to a young girl who was riding an a -bike with friends. Our ad hoc citizen's advocacy group feel strongly that an accident on our own trail is inevitable if adjustments are not made by the city. In addition, stiffer regulations on e bike safety on streets, especially for younger users are essential. It is our hope that this article will be helpful in enhancing your understanding of the perils of keeping the status quo. While the new signs on the trail encouraging bicyclist courtesy are helpful, they simply do not go far enough. Thank you in advance for your consideration. Anne O'Brien cc. Lisa Moller and Judith Shepherd, Friends of the Bear Creek Trail From: Anne OBrien <anneob@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2025 1:54 PM To: City Clerk Mail Subject: NYTimes Gift Article: The Shocking Crash That Led One County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes. (Gift copy) ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** [Some people who received this message don't often get email from anneob@sbcglobal.net. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderidentification ] Hello again, Anne here. Would you mind adding this a mail to my comments, as not all interested parties on your end may have online access to the New York Times. This is a gift article from me and therefore can be opened by those who do not have a subscription. Many thanks and much appreciated, Anne Explore this gift article from The New York Times. You can read it for free without a subscription. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11 /30/magazine/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legisiation- cal ifornia. html?u niocked_articie_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tUGAwFOT&smid=nytcore-ios-share Sent from my iPad From: Anne OBrien <anneob@sbcglobal.net> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2025 12:07 PM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: Lisa Moller; Judith Shepherd Subject: E-Bike Safety and November 30th New York Times article Attachments: Comments to 12-16 City Council Final.docx ** EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use properjudgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. ** [Some people who received this message don't often get email from anneob@sbcglobal.net. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderldentification ] Sent from my Wad 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times APT Obic New flork Vmcs-Magazine https://www.nytimes.com/2025/11/30/magazine/e-bikes- accidents-safety-legislation-california.html The Shocking Crash That Led One County to Reckon With the Dangers of EmBi'kes Unregulated e-bikes are a growing danger on American streets. In one Bay Area town, a terrible accident finally led to reform. By David Darlington David Darlington is a lifelong cyclist who has received a National Magazine Award for public interest for a previous article on traffic laws and bike safety. Nov. 30, 2025 In September 2023, Amelia Stafford was 15 and beginning her sophomore year at Terra Linda High School in eastern Marin County, Calif. An honor student who loved reading, played the trumpet, did well at science and aspired to work for NASA, Amelia often rode her bike to school. Both of her parents — Monica, who works for the Golden Gate National Parks Conservancy, and Scot, an Emmy- winning composer and a founder of the Pollen Music Group — have histories as cyclists: He grew up riding to school in San Francisco, and she commuted to her job on her bicycle across the Golden Gate Bridge. "It was very important to me that my kids grow up learning how to ride bikes," Scot says. "I wanted them to get exercise," Monica adds, so Amelia's bike didn't have a motor. In the wake of the pandemic, electric bicycles were proliferating. Many of Amelia's classmates had gotten e-bikes — or faster machines now known as e-motos — for birthdays and holidays. On a warm Saturday night after a football game, a group of kids was playing around with one. https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAwF... 1 /26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times Coral Billisi, AmelWs best friend, recalls that Amelia got on the bike behind someone and rode up and down the street. She says it was such a short ride that wearing a helmet didn't occur to anyone. When the bike toppled over, "our immediate reaction was that we all started laughing — we just thought it was so funny," she says. "Like, Ha ha, they're so stupid, they can't even ride bikes:' Then they saw the blood on the pavement around Amelia's head. Coral, who had taken a CPR course, called 911 and told the others not to touch Amelia. Then she ran to the Staffords' house and banged on the door. Monica had gone to bed early. She ran barefoot from the house. When she reached her daughter, Amelia's eyes were open, but they had rolled back and blood was coming out of her ears. E.M.T.s arrived soon after and transported her to MarinHealth Medical Center, where a CT scan showed bleeding between the skull and the brain. When doctors removed the right side of Amelia's skull, they found that the damage to blood vessels surrounding her brain was worse than normal for such injuries, and that the resulting blood clot was leading to compression on the brainstem. With considerable difficulty, Blake Taylor, the neurosurgeon who operated on her, stopped the bleeding. The surgery lasted almost until dawn, when Amelia was loaded into a helicopter for transfer to a hospital in Oakland. https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAwF... 2/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times Amelia Stafford at home in Marin County, Calif., She lost her sophomore year at Terra Linda High School to a 2023 crash on an a-moto. Balazs Gardi for The New York Times As he watched the helicopter take off, John Maa, a trauma surgeon on call that night at MarinHealth, was distraught. He had been fearing a case like Amelia's for years. As the only trauma facility in Marin County — which sits on the opposite side of the Golden Gate Bridge from San Francisco and features some of the https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAwF... 3/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times region's most inviting open space, as well as an affluent and fitness -conscious population — MarinHealth has always seen a lot of injured bicyclists. But historically most of the injuries were minor: broken clavicles, wrists, ribs. That changed in the summer of 2020, when Maa began noticing an increase in bicycle -related deaths. The first was a 72-year-old man who lost control of his bike on a downhill grade and crashed into a guardrail; he broke his ribs in 20 places, punctured a lung, fractured a leg, broke a wrist, suffered a concussion and, after several months of going back and forth between the hospital and rehab, died of a stroke. More fatalities followed, including a 62-year-old pedestrian who was struck by a bicycle on a multiuse path. "When I heard that, I thought: That's really strange," Maa says. "I can't remember a case of a pedestrian killed by a pedal bicycle" But the pedestrian hadn't been killed by a "pedal" bicycle. Like the case of the 72- year-old, an e-bike was involved — a device that Maa says he had never heard of till then. "But as we moved from the summer of 2020 into 2021 and 2022, and we kept hearing it reported through the hospital and the media — another e-bike accident, another fatality — at some point I was like, Wait a minute, there's something seriously wrong here" At the time, the county public health department didn't distinguish e-bike crashes from those involving conventional bicycles. But MarinHealth maintains a database of trauma cases, so Maa — a soft-spoken 57-year-old surgeon who in his off hours has also waged battles against the tobacco and soda industries — began talking with the medical director of trauma services, Edward Alfrey, who, it turned out, was compiling numbers on injuries associated with e-bikes. As the pandemic continued, the number of e-bike accidents increased. "You would expect that," Alfrey says, "because sales were skyrocketing." Indeed, in 2022, over a million e-bikes were sold in the United States, up from 287,000 in 2019, according to the Light Electric Vehicle Association. But what really struck Alfrey and Maa was that e-bike injuries were far more serious than those sustained on conventional bikes. Maa says they were more like what's seen in motorcycle https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAwF... 4/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times crashes. A pelvic fracture, for example, was uncommon on a pedal bicycle — only about 6 percent of conventional cycling injuries. For e-bike crashes, though, it was 25 percent. The most alarming difference was the fatality rate. "On a pedal bike, the chance of dying from an injury is about three -tenths of 1 percent," Alfrey says. On an e-bike, the data indicated, it was 11 percent. These findings signaled what was unfolding around the country. During the same four-year period when nationwide sales quadrupled, e-bike injuries increased by a factor of 10, to 23,493 from 2,215, according to the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System. A study by the University of California, San Francisco, found that from 2017 to 2022, head injuries from e-bike accidents increased 49-fold. As in Marin, casualties in other parts of the country included e-bike riders themselves and people they ran into. In 2023 in New York City, two pedestrians were killed by e-bikes, and 23 of 30 cycling fatalities were e-bike riders. In South Florida, a 66-year-old woman was killed by a 12-year-old boy on an e-bike, and a 54-year-old man riding a conventional bike died after being hit from behind by a 14- year-old on an e-moto. In Minnesota, a woman permanently lost her sense of taste and smell after being hit on a sidewalk by an e-bike. In San Diego County, the towns of Carlsbad and Encinitas announced public emergencies after a woman and a teenage boy were killed on e-bikes, and in Los Angeles, a 12-year-old girl died after crashing on the back of an e-bike. By the time the helicopter carrying Amelia Stafford was banking away to the east, Maa was out of patience. "All of the serious injuries prior to that were in older patients," he says. "This was a young person." After the aircraft was out of sight, he called Mary Sackett, a member of the Marin County Board of Supervisors. "The day that we were dreading has come," he told Sackett. "One of your young constituents is very seriously injured, and her outcome is unknown. This has changed everything. You have to do something"' https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAwF... 5/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times W_ .�p7 mariq� /� heolry Unsettled by the severity of injuries from a -bike accidents, John Maa, a trauma surgeon at MarinHealth Medical Center, had already been talking to officials about the problem when he treated Stafford's injuries. Balazs Gardi for The New York Times The argument for a -bikes is a compelling one: Because they're so easy and fun to ride, they inspire more people to bike instead of drive, with far-reaching environmental, economic and health -related benefits. A 2020 study of Portland, Ore., indicated that if one out of every seven automobile trips was instead made by https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAwF... 6/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times e-bike — according to the Department of Energy, half of all vehicle trips go less than three miles from home, a distance easily traversed by bikes — carbon emissions could drop by 12 percent. Bloomberg New Energy Finance calculates that e-bikes are already cutting worldwide demand for oil by a million barrels per day, or four times as much as all the world's electric cars. And because e-bikes cost only a fraction as much as automobiles, while also significantly reducing the costs associated with parking, fuel and maintenance, they are now seen by many as the key element of the micromobility movement, defined by low -speed, human- and electric -powered transportation. But to achieve this kind of broad societal benefit, e-bikes are likely to need greater regulatory oversight. The government's effectively hands -off approach dates to the turn of the 21st century, when Lee Iacocca, the former Ford and Chrysler executive, founded E.V. Global Motors, whose flagship product, the E-Bike, may have coined the term. That product didn't succeed, but in 2002 it helped bring about H.R. 727, which provided for the regulation of "low -speed electric bicycles" under the Consumer Product Safety Act. It also set the maximum speed for such bikes at under 20 miles per hour — a rate that, while fast by conventional bicycling standards, crucially placed it under the purview of the Consumer Product Safety Commission rather than the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, which would have subjected it to the same laws as motor vehicles. As a result, e- bike regulations are similar to those for conventional bicycles, meaning, among many other things, that operating one doesn't require a driver's license. As e-bikes have become more sophisticated — lightweight lithium -ion batteries have replaced heavy, lead -acid ones, and computerized motors now provide variable levels of assistance — numerous efforts have been made to classify them. Forty-six states have adopted some version of a three -tiered system of e-bike categories that was established a decade ago by PeopleForBikes, a trade and advocacy organization based in Boulder, Colo. In Class 1, the bike's motor assists the rider up to a speed of 20 m.p.h., but only when a rider is pedaling. Class 2 has the same top speed but also has a hand -operated throttle, similar to a motorcycle's, that can be used in lieu of pedaling. Class 3 is like Class 1, but its maximum assisted https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAwF... 7/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times speed is 28 m.p.h. (The federal limit of 20 m.p.h. applies to the speed generated solely by a motor; speeds can exceed that in combination with human pedaling.) As a rule, Class 1 bikes are permitted wherever a conventional bicycle can go (including bike lanes and trails), while Classes 2 and 3 are restricted to streets and roads (in theory if not in practice). "Class 1 is very similar to the definition of an electric bike in Europe," says Matt Moore, the policy counsel at PeopleForBikes. "The other two types are generally not allowed there — they're treated as mopeds," which require a license, registration and insurance. E-bike motors in the European Union are usually limited to a maximum speed of 15.5 m.p.h. — a pace seldom exceeded by casual conventional cyclists. E-bikes have now become so popular that old-fashioned, human -powered ones are tagged as "analog" or "acoustic" bikes. The extra boost of energy they provide feels like magic — a perpetual tailwind, a helpful nudge at your back. Without any training or education, however, people accustomed to analog bicycles can be unprepared for the power, acceleration and speed of e-bikes — not to mention their weight, which typically exceeds 50 pounds, or roughly twice that of conventional bikes. Hence the similarity to motorcycle injuries, thanks to increased momentum and the greater harm from impacts when they get out of control. https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAwF... 8/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times E-bike riders in Greenbrae, Calif. Under a 2002 federal law, the machines are regulated like regular bicycles, rather than as motor vehicles. Local laws around their use vary widely. Balazs Gardi for The New York Times Since e-bikes were legally defined as distinct from motor vehicles in 2002, apparently only one additional federal law — allowing their use on federally funded trails that don't permit motor vehicles — has regulated them further. Individual cities and counties, however, have enacted a crazy quilt of local rules. Some states are now considering mandatory licensing, registration and insurance for e-bikes. When Nashville commissioned a public survey in 2022 on the issue of allowing e- bikes on the city's greenways, there were 2,700 responses. Class 1 pedal -assist e- bikes got 54 percent approval; Class 2 hand -throttle bikes got 40 percent. Universities including Yale, Fordham and some California state schools have https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAwF... 9/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times banned e-bikes from their campuses. Following the death of the 66-year-old woman in Florida, the village of Key Biscayne outlawed e-bikes altogether. After a deadly collision between an e-bike and a pedestrian, a Boston city councilman proposed legislation banning mopeds and e-bikes for food delivery. Such a law would constitute the nuclear option in New York City, where food delivery represents ground zero in the e-bike explosion. During the pandemic, when services like DoorDash and Grubhub mushroomed in popularity, delivery workers embraced e-bikes to keep up with demand. At the same time, Citi Bike, New York's bike -share program, expanded the electric options in its rental fleet. The resulting swarm of fast machines — frequently driven in lawbreaking ways — gave rise to a grass -roots nonprofit group called the NYC E-Vehicle Safety Alliance. With more than 1,000 members (including 100 self -identified victims), its demands include the licensing of e-bikes — the goal of a proposed "Priscilla's Law," named for a 69-year-old educator who was killed by a rented e-bike that ran a red light — the confiscation of e-bikes that violate traffic laws and their prohibition from public parks. Mayor Eric Adams has responded by imposing an e-bike speed limit of 15 m.p.h., but because so many delivery workers are immigrants, the issue has taken on sociopolitical overtones. Not wanting to criminalize or deprive the underprivileged of "good employment opportunities," Ben Furnas, the executive director of the nonprofit bicycle -advocacy group Transportation Alternatives, recommends prohibiting the sale of Class 3 e-bikes. He adds that he would also like to see "much more regulation of the delivery-app ecosystem, so that it doesn't pressure workers into breaking the rules to hit their targets" — a position shared by Zohran Mamdani, the mayor -elect. In Marin, in response to the casualties there, the Marin Healthcare District board of directors passed a resolution in December 2022: "Requesting State and Local Governments to Study Further Measures to Safely Regulate Electric Bikes" When that generated no response, Maa, who is not on the board, reached out to public officials, who surprised him, he says, by reporting that the county coroner had no https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 10/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times record of any e-bike deaths at all. This turned out to be a labeling issue: Maa might have known that a patient had died from e-bike injuries, but by the time that was recorded by the coroner, cause of death could be "accident." Marin officials needed hard numbers to effect a change in public policy. In part because of this difficulty with the data, the county seemed to be making little progress. But then, Maa says, Amelia Stafford crashed, and everything changed: "It was like a light switch." https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 11 /26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times A replica of Stafford's skull, and the implant required after her surgeries, on her family'splano. Balazs Gardi for The New York Times Following her surgery in September 2023, Amelia was placed in a medically induced coma. After a week, she was taken off the drugs, at which point her parents, Scot and Monica, expected her state to be "somewhere between stupor https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 12/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times and vegetative." On the day her breathing tube was removed, they say they were told that, if she was going to be able to speak again, it might happen by that evening. They went out for a walk, leaving Scot's brother by Amelia's bedside. "All of a sudden," Scot remembers, "we got a text saying: `She's talking. A lot"' Over the next several days, Amelia slowly regained some mobility. A bacterial infection in her brain resulted in two more high -risk surgeries, but by November, she was allowed to return home — wearing a helmet when not in bed — and in late February, her skull was restored with a replica of its missing fragment. Gradually her speech, vision, hearing and memory returned to near normal, along with her ability to read and write. Monica describes this outcome as "more amazing than we can express" Talking about her crash today, Amelia calls the term e-bike "a play on words." If the machines were called motorbikes, she believes, they would be far less popular. "But the fact that it's called an e-bike" — evoking such everyday stuff as email, e- books or (less salubriously) e-cigarettes — "makes it accessible" Her friend Coral concurs. "People don't think about them as mini -motorcycles, which is really what they are," she says. "People think of them as `bikes plus' — just, like, a little extra. It's really geared toward younger people who don't have an understanding of the impacts." Bikes have always offered independence to kids — and liberated parents from ferrying them around — but the fun factor offered by e-bikes mixes dangerously with young people's proclivity for play, made worse because they are often not old enough to drive and don't know the rules of the road. The Marin chapter of Safe Routes to School, a national organization that encourages kids to walk and bicycle, has been teaching e-bike safety since 2022 (and Marin has also introduced an online E-Bikers Club to educate kids about rules and etiquette). But Matt Willis, a former public health director for Marin County, says he heard complaints that kids were "ignoring stop signs, weaving in and out of traffic, riding double and doing https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 13/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times wheelies down the middle of Sir Francis Drake Boulevard," which is Marin's main thoroughfare. There were, he adds, "reports of pedestrians being knocked over by e-bike 'gangs."' "People don't think about them as mini -motorcycles, which is really what they are," says Coral Billisi, Stafford's best friend. Balazs Gardi for The New York Times https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 14/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times Even some of the county's biggest e-bike boosters began to understand that something was out of order. One such person was Bob Mittelstaedt, a retired trial lawyer who bicycles several days a week on Marin's Mount Tamalpais, the reputed birthplace of mountain biking. Until a few years ago, he pedaled an analog bike, but as he approached his 70s, he felt increasingly "limited" — riding shorter and shorter distances over the same routes every day. Then a friend started regaling him with stories about how far he could ride on his e-bike. "So I took his for a test ride and never looked back," he says. Mittelstaedt, now a lean and energetic 77, and some fellow senior cyclists formed a nonprofit organization called E-Bike Access to advocate electric mountain bikes on Mount Tam. Mittelstaedt says that many of the arguments against e-mountain bikes are the same ones originally used against conventional bicycles: that they cause erosion and scare wildlife and hikers. "But then they'll usually say: `E-bikes are even worse. And even if you just allow the legitimate Class 1 ones, the next wave is going to be kids on their throttle devices"' By "throttle devices," he is referring to Class 2 machines, which have captured an estimated two-thirds of the e-bike market. According to PeopleForBikes, the rationale in 2015 for creating a class for bikes with throttles — which can eliminate even the modest exercise benefits of pedal assistance — was that many e-bikes already had them, and the trade organization didn't want to exclude those products and companies. But to Mittelstaedt and others, it's inappropriate to consider these vehicles to be "bikes" at all. "The essence of bicycling is pedaling," Mittelstaedt says. "A machine propelled by a motorcycle throttle just shouldn't be considered a bicycle. It can go from zero to 20 faster than a regular bike without any exertion at all." As a volunteer for Safe Routes to School, Mittelstaedt inventoried the classes and brands of bicycles and e-bikes at 12 local campuses in Marin County. He found that while a majority were conventional bikes, among electric devices those with throttles were by far the most popular — and that most of them had motors capable of going faster than 20 m.p.h. https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 15/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times "We all want to get kids out of cars and onto bikes," says Bob Mittelstaedt, who works to encourage bicycle use by students in Marin. "The manufacturers took advantage of that." Balazs Gardi for The New York Times To conform with federal law, Class 2 e-bikes have "speed controllers" that keep users under the limit. But these can be circumvented by magnets, dongles, third - party apps, "tuning kits," wire clippers or even software provided by the manufacturer — unlocking modifications popularly called "jailbreaking." "You do it by pushing a button or two or entering a code on the display," Mittelstaedt says. "It's as easy as changing a setting on your Whone." https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 16/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times By most accounts, the company that led this movement was Super73, an Orange County -based "American lifestyle adventure brand" founded in 2016. With retro styling, a bench seat and formidable 4-inch-wide tires, its product looked like a mini -motorcycle, and it attracted endorsements from the likes of Will Smith, Paris Hilton and Madonna. "Others, like Sur -Ron," a Chinese manufacturer, "were straight -up dirt bikes that don't fit the regulations at all," says Brett Thurber, an owner of a three -store Bay Area e-bike business called the New Wheel. "But kids were asking their parents to buy them because they look cool and go really fast." Some manufacturers — but not governments — have taken it upon themselves to call such machines "Class 4" e-bikes. Others refer to them as "out -of -class electric vehicles"; bicycle -advocacy groups, which want to avoid being associated with these machines, prefer "e-motos" In any case, they aren't bicycles, nor are they street legal without registration and a license, yet they still show up regularly on roads and bike paths. One online influencer called Sur Ronster, who also has a retail business called Ronster Rides, posts videos of bands of teenagers, dozens strong, outdoing one another's daredevil feats at breakneck speed on city streets and highways. "We all want to get kids out of cars and onto bikes," Mittelstaedt says. "The manufacturers took advantage of that. If the limit is 20 miles an hour, kids will want to go 21; if the limit is 21, they'll want to go 22. In the old days, when you had loud, gas -powered, smelly mopeds, everybody knew what they were" Today, because the vehicles are electric and quiet, it's hard for the police to detect when they've crossed the line separating e-bike from moped or motorcycle. Some schools in Marin County now prohibit such e-motos from parking on school property. On a weekday afternoon last spring, Mittelstaedt toured a few campuses to see how any restrictions were working. "We'll just pull in here, and you can see how effective the enforcement is," he said, approaching Tamalpais High School in Mill Valley (where he coaches a mock -trial team). The school has cages for kids to lock their bikes during the day, but several Super73s were parked beside them. "Because these are banned, they're not allowed inside the cage. So they just park https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 17/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times them outside the cage. Very effective." A few blocks down the road, at a water - treatment plant adjacent to Mill Valley Middle School, several e-motos were locked to railings in the parking lot, with more at a nearby community center. As the end of the school day approached, idling cars and S.U.V.s formed a line leading into the entrance of the middle school. "This is what we're up against — cars clogging up traffic, waiting to pick up their kids," Mittelstaedt said. "But it's a false dichotomy to suggest that the choice is either an electric device or parents bringing them in to school. It could be a regular bicycle — or it could be a legal e- bike" https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 18/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times Some schools in Marin County ban a-motos from school property; students just park their vehicles elsewhere. Balazs Gardi for The New York Times When school was done, kids streamed out of the building. Some got on conventional bikes; others mounted electric devices and sped out onto the bike path where a pedestrian was struck and fatally injured by an e-bike in 2022. "You can see how they're releasing their energy," Mittelstaedt said. "They're pent up all https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 19/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times day in school, you know, probably not really enjoying most of the topics; they can't wait to get out, and then they get on their bikes, popping wheelies, going 30 miles an hour. They're the big guns on campus now — it's just a great high for them." At a third stop, Redwood High School in nearby Larkspur, several machines — Jasion, Lectric, Ridel.Up — were locked to trees, poles and fences across from the school. Other e-motos — Movcan, Ridstar, Hovsco, Ariel Rider — were brazenly attached to bike racks in front of the administration office. "Ariel Rider is the fastest bike you see on these campuses," Mittelstaedt said. "They have advertised a top speed over 38 and a motor of 1,000 watts. This one has no class label, so it's illegal for anyone to ride" (A spokesman for Ariel Rider says that it no longer makes and sells such a model and that "all models are shipped with compliant speed settings," as well as the proper classification and safety labels.) Amelia was on an e-moto when she crashed. Coincidentally, in the course of his volunteer work before her accident, Mittelstaedt made the acquaintance of AmelWs mother, who was working for a public service organization on Mount Tamalpais. At one point, the two of them staffed a mobile van that provided information about the mountain to visitors. When Amelia's injury became public, Mittelstaedt regretted not having acted more quickly in his assessment of throttle bikes. "If I had been more forceful — if I had known more, if I had done the research on how dangerous these bikes are and said something to Monica at the time — maybe life would have turned out differently for Amelia" After Amelia's crash, Marin County applied what Mary Sackett, who would go on to become president of the county board in January of this year, calls a "full -court press." She convened a meeting on e-bike safety with Maa; Alfrey; Willis; Damon Connolly, Marin's state assemblyman; and representatives from law enforcement, education and Safe Routes to School. Willis, who had been working with E.M.S. on a system to track e-bike accidents, finally began compiling numbers collected by ambulance crews, which soon showed that the rate of e-bike-related accidents was nine times higher for youths than for riders over age 20. (The rate for 10-to-15- https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 20/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times year -olds was five times greater than for any other group.) The county proceeded to issue a public health advisory recommending that riders not use e-bikes with throttles, and in January 2024 Connolly introduced California Assembly Bill 1778, to prohibit anyone younger than 16 from riding a Class 2 e-bike and to require anyone using those bikes to wear a helmet. The proposed legislation had the potential to set national precedents. Amid the hodgepodge of e-bike laws established locally throughout the United States, most states have an age limit of 16 for Class 3, but none for Classes 1 or 2; in those states that have placed restrictions on these classes, the age varies from 14 to 16, but no laws at the time mandated limits specifically for Class 2. https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 21 /26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times Students near Redwood High School in Marin. "They can't wait to get out," Mittelstaedt says, "and then they get on their bikes, popping wheelies, going 30 miles an hour." Balazs Gardi for The New York Times The bill encountered resistance from bicycle advocates loath to stigmatize the machines or discourage people from getting out of cars. A group called Streets for All opposed the legislation, citing "an unfair marketplace for consumers who have invested in thousand -dollar e-bikes for their children"; "potential for selective and uneven enforcement"; "decreasing the number of cyclists on the road, thereby making those remaining less safe"; and "increasing teenagers' (who are historically the worst driving demographic by age) reliance on cars and therefore worsening the already high rate of vehicle collisions in California." Neither the Marin County Bicycle Coalition nor the California Bicycle Coalition (CalBike) took a position on the bill, though CalBike's policy director, Jared Sanchez, asked on the organization's website: "In a state where 4,000 people die annually and many more are injured due to traffic violence, some California cities are freaking out because teenagers on e-bikes ... did a wheelie?" Cycling -advocacy organizations generally subscribe to the view advanced by Ben Furnas of Transportation Alternatives. The focus, he says, should be "on the vehicles that are killing and maiming the most people: heavy cars and trucks." Instead of increased regulation of e-bikes, the solution should be infrastructure that allows "safe places for everyone" — specifically, protected bicycle lanes wide enough for both slower and faster bikes. The most egregious examples of the latter — out -of -class e-motos — are what e-bike supporters argue should be the target for policing, not unmodified Class 2 bikes. "For a hundred years, we just had cars and pedestrians," says Asha Weinstein Agrawal, the lead author of a forthcoming paper on e-bike safety and policy options in California for the Mineta Transportation Institute at San Jose State University. "Motorcycles were regulated like cars, but Americans treat bicycles as toys" In other words, bikes were an afterthought, not carefully integrated into the designs and rules of our roads — which Agrawal says is "much more of a problem now that we have electric bicycles on the road as well" While she agrees that it would be good to get people to switch from gas vehicles to e-bikes, she says "it doesn't make https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 22/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times sense to have an ever-growing number of different categories with separate rules." She has found that most people don't understand the three -class system. "Not surprisingly," she adds, "people are unlikely to follow rules they don't understand." The most consequential resistance to California Assembly Bill 1778 came from the State Assembly's transportation committee, whose principal consultant concluded that Marin's injury data wasn't sufficiently persuasive to justify a statewide law. As a result, the bill was eventually amended to a voluntary four-year pilot program, only in Marin County, with a requirement to report enforcement data by Jan.1, 2028. It still had to make its way through the State Senate, however — a challenge for which the star witness was Amelia Stafford. In May 2024, John Maa, who had been following both Amelia's progress and that of A.B. 1778, asked the Staffords if she could testify before the State Legislature. At first they said no, believing that Amelia had already been through a sufficient ordeal. "But when she heard about the opportunity, she surprised us," Monica says. "She said she wanted to do it" On the Tuesday after Memorial Day, Amelia traveled to Sacramento with her family and her friend Coral. After thanking "five teams at five hospitals" for enabling her to be there, she told the Senate's transportation committee that her accident showed how devastating a fall from a Class 2 e-bike can be. "To a teenager," she said, "these bikes seem like normal bikes. Twenty miles per hour doesn't faze us. It doesn't sound fast or dangerous. But the reality is far different" Echoing the findings by Maa, Alfrey and other surgeons around the country, she testified that falls from e-bikes are more like violent falls from motorcycles. "Because of what I've learned," she said, "I'm here to speak out to protect teenagers like me." The bill passed the Legislature in late August. On Sept. 27, days before the year's deadline for enacting new laws, Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a bill that requires e- bike batteries to be certified by an accredited testing laboratory; the following day, he signed a bill resembling Marin's, establishing a voluntary pilot program in San https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 23/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times Diego County but restricting e-bike ridership to age 12 or older for both Class 1 and Class 2 machines. Then, on Sept. 29, Newsom, who has a house in Marin, showed up at the Staffords' for an impromptu signing ceremony. N Stafford with her mother, Monica. Last year she testified before the California State Legislature in favor of a bill that imposed helmet and age rules on riders of Class 2 e- bikes. Balazs Gard! for The New York Times https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 24/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times "I saw two signature lines, and I thought one of them was for me," Amelia says. "I reached for his pen, and he very politely took it away from me. It was one of the most humiliating things in my life." Amelia's life would seem to warrant the opposite of embarrassment. After missing her sophomore year of high school, she returned in the fall of 2024 and is now a senior planning to go to college. She volunteers as a peer mentor at Kaiser Foundation Rehabilitation Center in Vallejo, Calif., and she and Coral started a First Responders Club at Terra Linda High School, teaching students how to react in an emergency. The seizures she has as a result of her injury, together with the rest of her experiences over the past two years, have altered her future plans. Instead of hoping to work for NASA, she now wants to study neuroscience. Two more California laws now prohibit the sale of apps that modify e-bikes to increase their speed beyond the legal limit, as well as the sale of devices that enable such modification. As a result, Super73's website now states that customers who downloaded the Super73 app after Jan.1, 2025, would not be able to modify its bikes beyond the Class 2 mode in which they're sold. But a customer -service representative for the company acknowledged by email that "the motor itself is capable of higher speeds in other configurations" The Marin law went into effect at varying points around the county this summer and, after grace periods, jurisdictions have begun enforcing it — but only after riders have been stopped for another infraction, like running a red light. The police are not supposed to stop anyone based on appearance (for example, their apparent age). Moreover, during a recent municipal meeting, one officer explained that when they try to pull juveniles over, the kids often flee, evading pursuing police cars via narrow trails and sidewalks. But he also noted that in one case, at least, the parents of a child who was injured while riding an e-moto were cited for allowing an unlicensed juvenile to operate a motorcycle. In any case, the new law doesn't seem to have diminished enthusiasm for what in some cases are illegal bikes. This September, at Redwood High School, where Mittelstaedt counted 31 e-motos in April 2024, he now counted 48. https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 25/26 12/14/25, 9:56 PM The Shocking Crash That Led Marin County to Reckon With the Dangers of E-Bikes - The New York Times A correction was made on Dec. 2, 2025: An earlier version of this article misstated John Maa's role at MarinHealth Medical Center. He is a trauma surgeon, not the chief trauma surgeon. When we learn of a mistake, we acknowledge it with a correction. If you spot an error, please let us know at nytnews@nytimes.com. Learn more A version of this article appears in print on , Page 20 of the Sunday Magazine with the headline: The E-Bike Dilemma https://www. nyti mes.com/2025/ 11 /30/magazi ne/e-bikes-accidents-safety-legislation-californ ia.html?unlocked_article_code=1.5E8.4hww.v5s2tU GAw... 26/26 CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 16, 2025 -WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT PHILIP BETTENCOURT BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. 4-SUPPORT FOR FUNDING AND AGREEMENTS WITH I I D FORTH E AVENUE 58 SUBSTATION EXPANSION PROJECT From: Philip Bettencourt <philip@bettencourtplans.com> Sent: Sunday, December 14, 2025 3:05 PM To: City Clerk Mail Cc: 'Hamby, JB'; Jon McMillen; Juan C.Perez; gbone@innovacounsel.com;jasbury@iid.com; Sherry Barkas Subject: City Council meeting public comments: Recognition of special service. EXTERNAL: This message originated outside of the City of La Quinta. Please use proper judgement and caution when opening attachments, clicking links or responding to requests for information. With Tuesday's City Council agenda featuring a package of more than 1000 pages, I wanted to express my support in advance for the staff report recommendations concerning the pending resolution approving items AB and C for the Funding And Reservation Of Capacity Agreement for electrical infrastructure improvements and recruitment of certain power equipment. I am speaking as an unaffiliated citizen activist of La Quinta but as someone with considerable experience in this matter. I served 2 terms as chair on the La Quinta Planning Commission. I was also an appointee to the Coachella Valley Energy Commission honored to serve with mayor Linda Evans. In that regard at year- end may I please take the privilege of noting Special recognition of folks who worked to get this package put together dealing with La Quinta's No 1 infrastructure challenge We should note first the proactive and pioneering role provided by the IID team including general manager Jamie Asbury as well J B Hanby the other IID directors and senior IID Power Department staff and the special counsel City manager John McMillen and his staff including Ms. Sherry Barkas, Laurie McGinley, and Jennifer Nelson The volunteer builder facilitation group had a valuable and tireless and able coordinator in Ms. Geri Bone. At the county level, Mr. Juan Perez played a special role and serving as a valuable aide to supervisor Perez. Next Steps. It is time to "Talk the talk and now walk the walk" with Mr. McMillen's report of the volunteer over subscription that work needs to take place now. For eligible participating builders to perfect their entitlements and secure the necessary funding to meet the city's commitments and expectations under the documents 1 We have an opportunity here do participate in an historic cost sharing plan that is workable, achievable, and sustainable. Good holidays. Thank you for your attention - and thank you for your service Philip Bettencourt text at will Telephone or CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 16, 2025 - WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY RESIDENT MICHAEL KRAHMER PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - OPPOSED TO THE BIGHORN SHEEP LOCATION AT THE CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB PROJECT From: Michael Krahmer <mkrahmer@msn.com> Sent: Monday, December 15, 2025 6:08 PM To: City Clerk Mail; Planning WebMail Subject: APPEAL 2025-0001: Testimony Attachments: Appeal 2025-0001 Club at Coral Mountain..pdf Dear City Clerk and Staff at Planning of the City of La Quinta, The attached document is my written comments to the Appeal 2025-0001 that is on the docket for City Council meeting on 12/16/2025. Please include the attached document in the meeting records. Thank You, Mike Krahmer Telephone: Michael Krahmer 80451 Palatine Ct TO: CityClerkMail@LaQuintaCA.gov La Quinta, CA92253 Planning@ L a Q u i n to CA. gov RE: APPEAL 2025-0001: Testimony for APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 2025-001 (TTM39058), SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-0001 AND SITE DEVELOPMENT PERMIT 2025-000W TO ALLOW SUBDIVISION OF 384 ACRE SITE, THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE GOLF COURSE PERIMETER LANDSCAPE, AND SALES CENTER; PROJECT CORAL MOUNTAIN CLUB: LOCATION SW CORNER OF 58 AND MADISON STREET. 15 December 2025 SUMMARY The Meriwether Companies Club at Coral Mountain proposal without modifications to the physically staked Sheep Fence and guarantee of trail access to the citizens and people of Coachella Valleywill be take a public space, curtail access to citizenry and modify the "coral" on Coral Mountain 11:63915101Z VA Meriwether Companies proposed "Club at Coral Mountain" development of the 384 acres on northeast flank of Coral Mountain has not been handled with the best interest of people who live in Coachella Valley and La Quinta at the forefront. Coral Mountain is a Natural History wonder and Archeological Notable site and abutting the Santa Rosa Wilderness, access to these features and places would be a priority if staff and council cared about their constituents and property taxpayers of La Quinta. I very much support private property rights, but this development will require large subsidies and city investments for electricity, roads, sewer and infrastructure which the bulk of will be borne by La Quinta property taxpayer and in return the current of residents will have their access to Coral Mountain curtailed, squeezed and cut off. Sprawl the bane of the of western USA for the last fifty years will be increased. That staff and the council did not mandate a 50-foot easement at the toe (along the of south flank of Coral Mountain for pedestrian, bicycle and horse traffic on the primitive road that has existed since at least is 1920s is incompetent oversight at best and or a giveaway to the connected backers of yet another private golf course. This isn't an oversight, but rather staff and council putting developers wishes for exclusivity, above the access of residents of Coachella Valley to a wonder. The way the sheep fence has been staked out with the access trail will be pushed up on to the slope of Coral Mountain. As the sheep fence is stake now the trail will be a rocky mess making it difficult for bikes and horses to pass through. The ask here is to bring the fence down to the base of Coral Mountain with a minimum of a fifty -foot set back from the toe slope line of mountain of the two alluvial coves (delineated in Cyan and Magenta in Figure 1) and any environmental sensitive areas (the petroglyphs, and the habitation site on the north side of the tract map - area (delinated in Green in Figure 1). The "coral" at Coral Mountain is the best example of periodic Lake Cahuilla that last appeared in early modern history in —1705 AD. The "coral" at 661h and Jackson is not good or as accessible. The east face of Coral Mountain is a unique natural historic spot, staff and council has not protected the residents of Coachella Valley access and freedom of movement to this place. PROSPOSED Conditions of Use MODIFICATIONS to the Permit (CUPs Requested) I have three specific modifications requests and it involves moving Sheep Fence approximately 10 to 75 feet to the east as shown in Figure 1. The access trail would then be to the west side of the Fence: MODIFICATION 1: The primitive road in front of the most stunning and cultural significant area of the old shoreline of real Lake Cahuilla (Figure 2 and Figure 3) in La Quinta area. It should be priority to keep this available to public and future generations. The way sheep fence has been staked out it puts the sheep on the west of the road and removes the old road from public access. The fence in this area should go on the eastside of road and let this area remain open to the people. This modification is a public take of —0.41 acres. MODIFICATION2: This sheep fence should be on the toe of Coral Mountain. The way sheep fence has stake it is approximately 10 feet up the slope of Coral Mountain in this area. At a minimum the fence needs to be moved off the "coral" and onto the flats. This modification is a public take of —1.06 acres. MODIFICATION 3: Gobsmacked that staff would let them put a sheep fence immediately in front of Bear Face Rock. Bear Face Rock is on Google Earth and staff and council is going to put a 8-foot sheep fence right in front of cultural landmark and undisturbed ground. Anyway, this area has obviously quarried there are three benches which I have labeled B1, B2 and B3. I think a reasonable trail and fence location would be on B3. The modification is a public take of 0.89 acres. WRAP UP I'd be amazed if Staff and Council takes anyone suggestions in this appeal, but I hope you do. I have to point out here that in the EIR for this project the current recreation use of this area was not required because the Wave Park was going to be open to the public and supposedly add to public recreation. When that Option A was rejected because of the lack of water and oversubscription of water in Colorado River Option B was adopted which is a private golf course. Ergo at that point, at a minimum staff and council, should have requested a recreation use survey for the project. That a photometric survey was not completed also seems like a significant oversight. Southern La Quinta with the cultural landmarks Coral Mountain, the Martinez Landslide, Boo Hoff Trail, Guadalupe Canyon and Devil Canyon are all at risk as the La Quinta sprawl coming calling. This area is a gateway to Santa Rosa wilderness and is more spectacular than Cove and has been protected by its lack of access. That is changing and I hope the people who live in Coachella Valley take note at what (and how and by who) is being tossed aside and lost for multiple generations. Coral Mountain East Flank t .S• ' fir;. • + NVIPW "! �tai�ed Ship Fence, A ` '' .. i' '�' awl • � ;� fie • SY4, ' �5. ��. 1 ,'1 1• r • 1 :ri_ a• Legend Bear Face Rock .;tic• • . rV ' i.r Coral Nbuntain ♦�.'� s - � 7 .r- 74 .ram .1 . f '' "L.r.L• i i I st ,;r♦ ;51� •r•;!�w a�1� jai � ,'.. ;*"•Zb•s,a,,.;, S•�; f: Xt f. >{ ���• '!.� .� •!�i lit'=1�: 5 -� r • • 1 • Y 111 j Figure 1: Coral Mountain Overview Map Discussing the Position of the "Sheep Fence" as staked by Meriwether Companies Club at Coral Mountain. The staked portion is the red line. The Green , Magenta and Cyan dashed lines are proposed changes to maintain public access around Coral Mountain. rp EscLW 4� • _ L 4�- Figure 2: Cultural Resource Site Al. This site has been used for the last 300 years by people of Coachella Valley and it should be kept open and accessible for future generations. The sheep fence should be put on farside of the obvious road. Currently the sheep fence is staked between the rock and the road. Figure 3: Cultural Resource Site A2. Mortar holes this is case where the fence needs to be far enough away as to not disturb this site and to allow access to citizenry. 7M ,i � - �` •ate.-� � - - v" , � '~ Y + � - '+ � _ _ -< ���_ •-�::. T , �•�:` '� _ .see 11and Fencs. bourfT p ere: tf� �la�.►�� N y Y _ FIGURE 4: Site of Proposed MODIFICATION 2. Note the bike is on a survey marker for the proposed "Sheep Fence" public through access will be behind that fence (Red Line). The fence needs to be brought to toe of slope of Coral Mountain and not on Coral Mountain (Magenta Line). ell Figure 5: The Bear Face Rock section of the staked fence line. While this site is obvious old quarry site, the sheep fence a staked by Meriwether Companies goes onto undisturbed slope of Coral Mountain. A trail behind this fence would be destructive and tight. The fence should go on Bench 3. CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 16, 2025 -WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY INDIO RESIDENT CHRIS McFADDEN PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - OPPOSED TO LOSS OF ACCESS TO CORAL MOUNTAIN OPEN LAND From: Chris Mc fadden <cmcfadden@mmarc.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2025 11:14 AM To: Planning WebMail <Planning@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Appeal 2025-0001 Comment regarding the above referenced Public Hearing today: Mywife and I reside in Indio for the last 7 years, and we frequent the Coral Mountain / Boo Hoff trail area on a weekly basis. It is one of the few outdoor hiking areas in the local vicinity. We have noticed a substantial increase in use of this area over the last few years likely due to the increased use of the LQ Cove / Bear Creek Trail areas. It is puzzling to us that this proposed project does not appear to have been adequately addressed by the City (AHJ) with requiring reasonable consideration for continued access / integration to this archaeological and historically significant area. It would be nice if this Easterly trail area and access consideration is integrated into a larger La Quinta Cove Communitytrail system much like Palm Desert had achieved with the Art Smith Trail. We would bevery disappointed to see an opportunity lost, once this spectacular area is walled off by this project. Regards,, Chris McFadden Chris and Vonda McFadden CITY COUNCIL MEETING - DECEMBER 16, 2025 -WRITTEN PUBLIC COMMENTS BY THERMAL RESIDENT JESS SANCHEZ PUBLIC HEARING ITEM NO. 2 - OPPOSED TO LOSS OF ACCESS TO CORAL MOUNTAIN OPEN LAND From: Jess Sanchez <vivachavez63@hotmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2025 11:37 AM To: Planning WebMail <Planning@laquintaca.gov> Subject: Letter to address proposed development on 58th and 60th To La Quinta City Council: This letter is to address the proposed development between 58th and 60th Avenue. I am an avid hiker, biker, dog walker and nature lover. I have been hiking in the proposed area for about 15 years. Thus I know the area well. When I saw the actual grading of the land and the wooden stakes mapping out the area, I knew that we would be losing access to one of the last open deserts in the east valley close to us. Yes, there are the La Quinta Cove hiking trails, however it is like a busy and bustling inner city . It is overcrowded and over used. The land by Coral Mountain is open, tranquil and beautiful. Many residents and visitors use the land to go hiking, off roading, horseback riding, mountain biking, dog walking and many other activities. (At times it is even used the as a take -off for para planes) I enjoy it because I can get away from everybody and everything that stresses our life. It is a place of peace, beauty and enjoyment . I have seen and elderly man and his wife chant or pray up on the mountain side. I wave to them many times. I love it when he blows his concha shell sounding off a call that acknowledges his ancestors. I have seen many rare animals that come down the mountain like mule deer, big horn sheep and even a wolf. It's a place where my dogs can run freely like the wind. I play hide and seek with my maltipoo-Chibi. My wife and I attempt to hid among the chaparral and trees . He runs back and forth to each of us as we tried to hide ourselves each time he runs to the other person. He brings great joy to us when Chibi is happy and free. This will no longer be something we do together if the project is approved. We also take the time to acknowledge God's creation of the desert and life itself. The area is peaceful enough to gather your thoughts of the day in silence and transformed them into something greater than you. I often climb up on the rock formations near the proposed development to view the open desert and surrounding valley. I think how fortunate we are to have this beauty before us but it is quickly replaced with images of the houses, streets and a golf course. Tears come down on our faces as we think about how the land will be transformed from natural beauty to man's vision of progress. This is our way of enjoying our life and beauty in the Coachella Valley desert and mountains. I am retried educator now. Walking and hiking in this area is one of my great joys of retirement. However if this project is approved, it would take away from my daily activities of outdoor life with our family and pets. Mr. Jess Sanchez Thermal POWER POINTS CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 16,2025 City Council Regular Meeting December 16, 2025 1 4 w 'A LIP s r"rw CIA` -- City Council Regular Meeting December 16, 2025 PUBLIC COMMENT - MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA 1 r1i p_yW ak CAL'066NII"A City Council Regular Meeting December 16, 2025 CLOSED SESSION IN PROGRESS City Council Regular Meeting December 16, 2025 PUBLIC COMMENT — MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA CALORNIN - City Council Regular Meeting December 16, 2025 P1 - SilverRock Development Project Status Update � � l City Council Regular Meetin December 16, 2025 P2 — American Public Works Association 2025 Project of the Year B.E.S.T. Award for Dune Palms Bridge Improvements tit CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting December 16, 2025 131 - Appoint a Member of the City Council to Serve as Mayor Pro Tempore for Calendar Year 2026 ( 1P Ad City Council Meeting December 16, 2025 B2 - Appoint Members of the City Council to Serve on Various Outside Agencies for Calendar Year 2026 C.1LIp RNIA tea Qaixta; CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting December 16, 2025 B3 - Approve Recipients of the Pillar of the Community Award 04Lf t4 ,. /q I, C.�LI R: NIA '� Pillar of the Community • Candidates must be or have been an LQ resident for a minimum of three years. • Must have dedicated a minimum of three years of service to the community: — Community Engagement & Leadership — Volunteer Efforts & Philanthropy — Public Service Pillar of the Community • Nominations are excepted year-round. • Award recipients are recognized at a Council meeting, and their names are added to the Community Awards Monument in Civic Center Campus. Phil La Greca • La Quinta resident for 20 years • Arts and Community Services Commission, 2019-2023 • Volunteer, La Quinta Art Celebration, 2020-2025 • Certified Tourism Ambassador (Visit Greater Palm Springs) • Volunteer, Coachella Valley Horse Rescue Doug Hassett La Quinta resident for 33 years Construction and Appeals Board, 2014-2015 Coachella Valley Mosquito and Vector Control Board, 2015-2021 Planning Commission, 2021—Present NN Volunteer performer: City of La Quinta Veterans Recognition Ceremony, 9/11 Vigil, Hunter Lopez Vigil, and City Picnic City Council Meeting December 16, 2025 B4 — Appropriate Funding for Long Lead -Time Power Equipment for Ave 58 Substation Expansion and Approve Agreements with III) fy� Background • IID's policy that growth pay for growth led Staff to explore a cost -share option. • Since 2023, the City has been working with Imperial Irrigation District (IID) and private developers on a cost - share plan to expand the Avenue 58 power substation. • The substation is near capacity and needs to be expanded to accommodate new development. Background • The addition of a fourth transformer bank and associated improvements could serve 3,000 to 4,000 new homes. • The estimated total cost for expansion of the Avenue 58 substation is $23.25 million. • At the 2025 Community Workshop, residents said addressing IID equipment needs was their No. 1 priority. Background On November 18, 2025, the IID Board of Directors approved the following Ave 58 substation expansion agreements: 1. Engineering and Procurement Agreement for the purchase of long lead- time equipment to be paid for by the City, subject to reimbursement by developers. 2. Funding and Reservation of Capacity Agreement for the Avenue 58 Transformer Bank Addition. • IID would continue to own, maintain and operate the substation. • The two agreements with IID would ensure the cost for the substation expansion is shared between IID (up to 20%) and the developers, with the City and County of Riverside providing backstop funding if necessary. Background • Once ordered, long lead-time power equipment, which includes a distribution transformer, breakers, switchgear and control house, takes 14-16 months to obtain. • Construction of the fourth bank is expected to start in 2027 and be completed in 2028. LAQUINTA SUBSTATION; Engineering and Procurement Agreement • Approved by HD Board on November 18, 2025 • Starting Q 1-Q3 of 2026 • City advance funds up to $9.4 M • These funds are first to be repaid as developers participate Funding and Reservation of Capacity Agreement • Approved by IID Board on November 18, 2025 • IID to participate up to 20% • Developers' participation must be > 50% of remaining • City and County to backstop as needed 58 Substation 50 MVA Bank Addition • Total Cost $23.25 M • IID maximum share @ 20% - $4.65 M • Developer minimum share @ 50% $9.3 M* • City maximum backstop @ 65% - $6.1 M* • County maximum backstop @ 35% - $3.2 M* December 16, 2025 The Club at Coral Mountain CM Wave Development 325 Dwelling Units. Commercial 1111111111111111f1 SrW corner Madison 8 Ave. 58 5.f00 La Quints 7J14f25 Estate Collection at Cora: 2 Mountam Diversified Pacific 54 Resdenhal Units SM corner Madison 8 Ave. 60 1.000 La Quints 10129125 3 Bell -era Paydar Properties Inc 320 Residential Units S!E comer Monroe and Ave 60 3.200 La Quinta 10/16125 Sunrise Company Andalu— 130 Remaining Resdental Units South of Ave 58 between Madison 3 Monroe St 1,300 La Quints 4 10128125 Estates atp MDM Enterprises Inc 79 Residential Uniells 400 amp South of Ave 54 between Madison 6 Monroe St 2,370 La Quints (Tract Map 36744j 3674 panels 5 TBD 1.200 Residential Units and 100 6 Travertine TRIG Land Room Hotel Ave 60 8 Madison St 14.600 La Quints 1012&25 7 Enclave at Griffin Ranch (Vaulter) Vauksr 90 Residential Units SWC Monroe St 8 Ave. 54 1.484 La Quints 11 f2412025 Ranch at Madison Single Family Residential, Sport Discovery Land Co. Cottages, Golf Co.—, Southeast comer of Monroe 8 Ave 53 4.000 County week of 8 Residences Only Clubhouse, Fitness 8 Spa 121V25 Vista Santa Rosa Gateway Monroe Properties LLC Commercial 8 Mised Use 8 SE corner if Airport 8 Momoe 2,375 County 9 Seniors 1115125 Summer l La Quints Phase II 10 (Apartments) Greyswr 20 acres. 150 unds MF Monroe 6 Ave 55 975 County 11q/25 392 Residential Units (active 11 Schumacher Property Schumacher/Barton Land aduh 8 Commer—I NEC Monroe $ d 601h Ave. 5,000 City 1111815 12 Santa Rosa 60 Santa Rosa 60 Investors, LLC 80 acres. 231 home plan Ave 60 (southside) 114 east of Monroe 2,310 County TB-) Developers in La Quinta Total 29 OS4 56% 114.11140 34",. Develooem in Countv Total 27 28 14 Questions & Discussion CALIFORNIA City Council Meeting December 16, 2025 PH1 — Community Development Block Grant 2026-27 J CAIIPkfNIA` - Community Development Block Grant 2026-27 JOBS AVAILAB�L HCALIH C'E Ep _ FIOfME REPAIR Background • County of Riverside Housing and Workforce Solutions (HWS) CDBG Program — Federal Program overseen by HWS — Administered by County • City of La Quinta — Cooperating City under County CDBG — Participant since 1983 Program Overview • Annual process to allocate CDBG funds • Estimated 2026-2027 allocation - $1577200 • Public Services — 15% threshold • Public facilities and improvements — 85% Program Overview Who can be funded What can be funded • Non-profit organizations Public facilities & • Local governments improvements • Public housing authorities Special economic development activities • Affordable housing • Public services Public Service Applications • 2 applications received • Maximum award - $23,580 • Bovs and Girls Club, La Quinta Unit: Fee waiver/reduction program — $24,000 • Palm Springs International Film Society (PSIFS) Student Screening Day - $10,000 Public Improvement Applications La Quinta: — ADA improvements at City -owned facilities: $133,620 AM 14 Questions? 0 A City Council Meeting December 16, 2025 PH2 —Appeal 2025-0001 Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of TTM 2025-0001, SDP 2025-001 & SDP 2025-0002 (';\r iNN6Nite December 16, 2025 41 42 21 Background • The Appellant is requesting that the City Council reverse the Planning Commission's approval of Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001, Site Development Permit 2025-0001 and Site Development Permit 2025-0002. • These applications are the first three implementing projects for the Coral Mountain Club, part of Specific Plan 2003-067 (Andalusia at Coral Mountain), as amended in 2024. Background • SP 2003-067 was amended in 2024 to modify the layout/land use patterns, development standards, and design guidelines for the west half of the Specific Plan area (west of Madison Street). • This portion of the Specific Plan is now referred to as Coral Mountain Club — Allows up to 750 dwelling units, a golf course, and a commercial corner on the 384-acre site. Background • An Environmental Impact Report (EIR) was certified by Council on March 5, 2024, via Resolution 2024-007, which analyzed the development of the Specific Plan Amendment as approved. • The Planning Commission held a public hearing on October 28, 2025, and after considering all public comments, including comments from the appellant read into the record by a member of the public, approved the TTM and SDPs by unanimous vote of all members present. Tentative Tract Map SDP 2025-0001: Golf Course Plan SDP 2025-0001: Site Perimeter SDP 2025-0002: Sales Center Basis of Appeal • The Appeal consists of the following components: — Procedural Issues relating to: • Inadequate public notice • Lack of access to staff reports • Third party representation at the Planning Commission hearing • Inadequate response to Appellant by staff Basis of Appea — Project Related Issues: • General Plan and Zoning Inconsistency/Regional master planning • Impacts to Cultural Resources • Impacts to recreational and visual resources • Environmental impacts and site design • Cumulative impact relating to Travertine • Impacts of fugitive dust • Public safety and infrastructure Recommendation • Subject to modification based on written and verbal testimony and evidence that may be presented prior to and during the public hearing, staff's recommendation is as follows: • Adopt a resolution denying Appeal 2025-0001 and upholding Planning Commission Resolution No. 2025-012, adopted on October 28, 2025, approving Tentative Tract Map 2025-0001 (TTM 39058), Site Development Permit 2025-0001 and Site Development Permit 2025-0002 to allow the subdivision of the 384-acre site, the development of the golf course, perimeter landscape, and sales center within the Coral Mountain Club project. December 16, 2025 53 54 27 December 16, 2025 55 56 NM December 16, 2025 NOTE ENVIRONMIENEA SENSITIVE AREA NO GRADING' SENSITIVE ARE NO GRADING' 57 58 4 EH = If GOLF SITE LANDSCAPE SCHEME REEREERREEREE I GOLF COURSE AT COPAL MOUNTAIN CLUB I SITEDEVEW 29 CORAL MOUNTAIN Gem of La Quinta Abundant wildlife, archeological features, unique geologic and geomorphologic features, `_ and human history Notes to accompany Mary Mann City Council Presentation APPL 2025-0001 16 Dec. 2025 As the "Gem of the Desert," the City of La Quinta is committed to enhancing its unique natural surroundings for the benefit of its residents through support for the arts and culture, public safety, affordable housing, sustainable fiscal and environmental guidelines, multiracial and multi -generational activities and events, and preservation of its ancient and recent history. I Basis of Appeal The approval TTM2025-0001, SDP2025-0001, and SDP2025-0002 by the planning commission does not adequately protect the interests of the residents of La Quinta with respect to: • Health and safety risks created by the construction; • Long term health and safety risks during development operations; • Traffic and circulation; • Ongoing financial obligations; • Infrastructure obligations; • Increases in utility rates; • Water security; • Making steps toward becoming a sustainable community 'Basis of Appeal The approval of TTM2025-0001, SDP2025-0001, and SDP2025-0002 by the planning commission does not adequately protect the geological, archaeological, historical and recreational components of Coral Mountain and its surrounding areas. These are key assets within City limits, but of local and regional importance, decisions of this magnitude on this key property are far reaching. City should verify agreements with CVWD, IID, Tribes, County of Riverside, and these agreements should be made public. Input from surrounding stakeholders should be considered and disclosed. The proposed project not does not protect the rights of the public to access and utilize the recreational and historical components of the Coral Mountain area. Prior approvals did not adequately identify or discuss the long-term strategy for management of these shared assets. " Coral Mountain is AWESOME Current plans for development all around Coral Mountain have not taken into account management of the desert, documentation and preservation of ancient and recent history, current use, or future possibilities. Project abuts designated ecologically sensitive areas and federal lands Ir Coral Mountain is HISTORIC 4-A December 16, 2025 65 TrenevA•rx PNwe. Orawu., 8 y �xT wryee wml,.na f Ceteliru 6[M1IMa C � �� E I Exuufbn ol5an,lago PesA vok+i us TTT iS I�all �� Eelrv4on ol5bnw�peYok �.. =qt 1 IluAan kM1u, _,_ ,e,lorrorEo„eeMwerord. :r,,.MPn..+u InrAen (uhrrel Mnunt.lm Merme Mall xdlmenl+iron Mruughuur P+kWoe (emer+ �donrran, nevonHn. CerLonrleruu,..rm Ppmw nr+u, a.H.m MPNPe awn end wnhnn venrxw a+a.r S.t Merrne Mell eedlmenunw rn wr,M1ead MPNre p.K.1 I.dW �InrruYun a4Ab...... P.»cmbanetlle.nd Wn'e�ph t pUp mur ,.n MN... t,". Roadside Geology of Southern California Sylvester and Gans, 2016' '""`E nn;o;m;;"°ram A. End of Miocene (5.3 Me) B. Mfd•Phocene (-3.0 Me) { SFH ifs._ 0 C s l 0 100 200 Mrrl�� Vwn C. Present Day tt6 116 114. 35 v� 1� - I prEf pb •\ \ lC �AZ proAee. _ _ DoreseyY�406 33 December 16, 2025 67 34 December 16, 2025 0 0 0 O O O O 0 - O O O O O U e 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 p 0 O O O p � gyp'' O ty f G� 1'IxnlinR ! c.: IX-1 Garden 70 0 0 .m« P«c«..• �I ( row.aeo i co..,w«.,�. ic..:•••.w«aa..o �..a cwuruo°un.iuw s«.,�.jwsa c«,pnu.y u,•- � _.i,kn.;�,.•rr,zW CONCEPTUAL PBS BARRIER DLAI FIGURE 2& 35 I Sheep Fence and trail Alignment t;, �.► • Fence alignment on the west side, which is claimed to be mandated by the 'CDFW', but involves several stakeholders. In the approved r� documents the alignment of the fence (and trail) was left open. But nothing has changed from the proposed alignment, nor any discussion t� 4 Ili i,\ t presented on the options considered. • No letters of support or comments on the fence plan were solicited or provided from the stakeholder agencies and or groups requesting the 'q fence. It • The proposed trail is not wide enough, goes through an active golf area .l§ • Public Easement has not been identified in TTM • CVWD and BOR have not provided comments regarding this plan, though the plan prosed implies that there is a plan for continued use of this area as a public trail • No comments provided from Desert Recreation District The rock art sites are well known and documented. The statements that the location or contents are confidential are false. Documentation of these resources shows how the archaeological resource is continuous, not only existing in the mapped ESA. This outline shows the rock art as a continuous site which extends from outside the private property and into Rock Art Plan needs to encompass all of this From Three Rock Art Sites at Coral Mountain, La Quinta, Riverside County, California, Daniel F. McCarthy and Leslie J. Mouriquand, Pacific Coast Archaeological Society, 2005 December 16, 2025 37 5 Project boundary intersects Coral Mountain on S and SW I ' Faulty Perimeter Fence Plan I v AMWr sl ` THE USE OF ROADWAYS AND PATHS ON Google Earth APPLICANT'S PEOPERTY LONG BEFORE 1972 image 1996 OPERATE PRESCRIPTIVE EASEMENT HE RIGHT OFMEMBE SOF THE TTHATPROTEEC S T clear road, path PUBLIC TO CONTINUE TO VISIT AND ENJOY CORAL MOUNTAIN AS THEY HAVE FOR MANY DECADES. December 16, 2025 79 M MR u; CORAL MOUNTAIN Gem of La Quinta ' DREAM of Coral Mountain Regional Park • Generations of people have used this area for praying, horse back riding, exploration, picnics, hiking, walking their dogs, climbing, off road vehicle use, trail access to the Boo Hoff trail, picnicking, painting • Access to Santa Rosa Wilderness (that has been already cut off for access throughout La Quinta by private developments) • EIR referenced in the Specific Plan 03-067 Amendment 5 specifically in the items relating to the West Tract inadequately addresses the disturbance to the natural environment, accessibility to our public lands, and is in direct violation of the City Municipal Code. • Readily available documents concerning the approved project have not been updated as required (e.g. new plat map, schedule, notice to local residents of pending work, posting of intent to disturb in the affected areas bordering public lands • The EIR document that was approved in 2022, was met with significant public push back in a prior conception of the project. The new plan was approved along with another change to the general plan without adequate public notice. The Sheep Barrier was one of the additions whose impact was not adequately considered in the previous conception of the project ' DREAM of Coral Mountain Regional Park • EIR did not consider alternative uses of the site, current use of the land, the changes that have occurred in the demographics of the City • Regular users of the site and local residents have not received notice of pending work and no detailed schedule of work has been produced • Violation of the City Municipal Code Chapter 7 for historical preservation • La Quinta Trails Management subcommittee engagement to determine location and nature of public trail that is mentioned in project documents - has this happened? • Engagement with Coachella Valley Conservation Commission and other regional stakeholders to assess the ultimate correct management and development adjacent to public lands • Phasing plan for development not updated, public not informed • Final maps showing trail connection Barrier fence will make this a tight corridor and access onto Coral Mountain public space will be restricted ' DREAM of Coral Mountain Regional Park • Other impacts not considered • Worker trips - East and South workers in individual vehicles between 5-7 am (in winter) - these are the jobs we are talking about. How are we considering the impacts and needs of this population - air quality, noise, traffic, use of roadways, need for public parking, stopping, at a minimum, trash, restrooms • How do we reduce these trips? — for better air quality • Construction - large tracts getting torn up at once - dust • Conditions are windy, dry, we are all at risk • After construction golf course, maintenance - water use, lawn mowers (air and noise pollution) lungs, wind, support to reduce pollution • Echo from Coral mountain amplifies sound December 16, 2025 (*A CORAL MOUNTAIN CITY COUNCIL APPEAL HEARING - DECEMBER 16, 2025 Ag�klllt MERIWETHER 85 Overview R NT � Awroxraw VICINITY MAP / 581H AV@IUE f / E Residential SIT Commercial Golf Course W 43 December 16, 2025 87 �� is ' � �.+�.I4.� *'�",>!J<;•i NOTE'. EXISTING ADOBE STRUCTURE WITH 75• BUFFER. SEE PAGE 22 Masterplan IV , A.- NOTE'. ENVIRONMENTALLY 9 \ SENSITVE AREA (ESA) \ NOGRADINGIoff C o uRvoRra<w. VICINITY MAP NOTE. SDPBS BUFFER ZONE ` NO PLANTS FROM CVMSHCP '< F' serNAveuF . TABLE 4-11 <' WE PBS FENC I NOTE ENVIRONM:MALLY" �'" AVErvuE E ENS`IVE AR EA ILSAI / NC GRADINGI �- p CORAL N^.OUNTAfN 1 �'��� s !!.••7 t NOTE' ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREA(ESA)-NOGRADINGI +—,' J 9p MAINTAINED TURF TRANSITION TO DESERT CRUST DESERT RE -VEGETATION WITH DISTANT MOUNTAIN VIEWS Character Images M December 16, 2025 W welcoming ' carefree & casual extension immersion 1 A:-. , . =" _ .. U e Y it 'r 0 S R SH UB AND GROUNDCOVER MIX Character Images Landscape Framework 45 December 16, 2025 Viewpoints NAT Q 5 rl. Ar, lk* From Madison Street 91 Viewpoints K 16 IWO W$ I From Avenue 58 92 M December 16, 2025 Range Pavilion 93 Response to Appeal MERIWETHER 94 47 December 16, 2025 95 LEGEND A+... 58" ANOnuo 1I 0 Single Family Lot Residential 0 II y C&O.n. 001i0'1 • ', 0 Commercial l Corner 2024 Approved Project ct Entry �i'' • 0 Single family Lot Homesites. fyp. Site Plan 0 CF... I' e•iA 0 8.0.R./ CVWD Easement 1 Y t r,+ �f- 0 Cluster Residential Product \� ,••� n O n,e• 0 0 Active Sports • J ,J 0 - Primary Club r t� /I� t. _ 0 Golf Irrigation Lake 1•1 2 acwfl � l 0 Single family Lot Residential Mououn t Carolntain Amenity Mountain 0 Activity Lake f•i' to--j .. �.�) � T) I tr. A.*4 -a Wnl.MCA operor . raD- - - --i �-•�`�����`�` 2025 Site Plan GOLF COURSE SITE (182 ACRES) �. Sx'mnG AGORE SiR001URE • RUFRR sEE RACE u �' +� NOR'. ENNRONMfNiAEO'SFnSrtIVE ``-_ —�. 11 MEA IfSAI-NOGRAOINGI _ I nI....... .. NOR 30 R03 WfFER 20NE O RIAHIS FROM 4BEF A-113 RBS FIN. — NM —R—O—s— AREA IfSA)-NO GMWHGI I I I NOR EW�R� ME )- NO 3li—i i iEsal � xo GRAOrc,GI 20 December 16, 2025 2024 Approved Site Plan 97 Current 2025 Site Plan Comparison 2•