HomeMy WebLinkAboutBureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC-compressedCITY OF LA QUINTA
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) ACCESSIBILITY
COMPLIANCE ASSESSMENT AND TRANSITION PLAN CONSULTING
June 5, 2026
BUREAU VERITAS | ERIK PILLER
P 800.733.0660 | ERIK.PILLER@BUREAUVERITAS.COM
1.Cover Letter .................................................................................................................................01
2.Firms Background, Qualifications, and Experience .........................................................02
3.References of California Government Agencies ................................................................09
4.Complete Pricing List ................................................................................................................16
5.Complimentary Services and Pricing ...................................................................................17
6.Staffing and Project Organization .........................................................................................18
7.Subcontracting Services ...........................................................................................................21
8.Disclosures ....................................................................................................................................21
9.Explanation of Methodology ...................................................................................................22
TABLE OF CONTENTS
BUREAU VERITAS | ERIK PILLER
P 800.733.0660 | ERIK.PILLER@BUREAUVERITAS.COM
Attachments
I
June 5, 2026
City of La Quinta
Attn: Monika Radeva, City Clerk
78495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
RE: Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Accessibility Compliance Assessment and Transition Plan Consulting
Dear Ms. Radeva,
Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC (Bureau Veritas or BV) is pleased to provide the City of La Quinta with the
enclosed proposal in response to the RFP for ADA Assessment and Transition Plan Consulting services. Bureau Veritas
understands the requirements of the RFP and is well qualified to perform the services.
Proven Experience | Bureau Veritas has extensive experience providing ADA Assessments for City, County, and State
Government entities. We are licensed in the State of California and are familiar with all ADA and State codes and
regulations. In addition to ADA Self-Evaluation and Transition Plan Expertise, Bureau Veritas offers a full suite of services
including ADA plan check, inspections, design and turn-key project management for implementation. Bureau Veritas’ code
compliance group has performed ADA, plan check and inspections for hundreds of municipalities acting as augmented
staff or third party consultants.
Highly Qualified Team | Bureau Veritas is an architecture and engineering firm focused on assessments and planning
studies, with 800 professionals nationwide.
ADA Experience | Bureau Veritas has performed over 1,000 projects in California and has an extensive resume of local and
regional clientele including:
While headquartered in Maryland, we have several CA office branches, and will be utilizing our Irvine, CA office branch.
Bureau Veritas is committed to working with the City to provide the highest possible quality of service. We appreciate
the opportunity to present our qualifications for this project and look forward to working with the City of La Quinta. I
am available at (800) 733-0660, ext. 7292704 or Erik.Piller@bureauveritas.com to further discuss our qualifications. This
proposal an all information and pricing provided is valid for ninety (90) days. All individuals who will perform work for the
City is free of any conflict of interest.
Sincerely,
Erik Piller
Executive Vice President
•City of Alameda, CA
•City of Tracy, CA
•Hayward Recreation and Parks, CA
•City of Napa, CA
•City of West Covina, CA
•City of Hermosa Beach, CA
•City of Mountain View, CA
•City of Garden Grove, CA
•City of Brea, CA
•City of Orange, CA
•San Bernardino County Transportation Agency, CA
•City of Chino, CA
•City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
•City of South Lake Tahoe, CA
BUREAU VERITAS | ERIK PILLER
P 800.733.0660 | ERIK.PILLER@BUREAUVERITAS.COM
1. COVER LETTER
2
Company: Bureau Veritas Technical
Assessments LLC
Year Founded: 1986
Headquarters: 6021 University Boulevard, Suite 200
Ellicott City, MD 21043
Project Office: Ir vine, CA
Contact: Erik Piller
Executive Vice President
Telephone: (800)733-0660, ext. 729704
Email: Erik.Piller@bureauveritas.com
Website: bvna.com
Tax ID: 02-0655997
Ownership: LLC
State of
Incorporation: Maryland
Parent Company: Bureau Veritas North America, Inc.
Company Information
HQ
HQ
HQ
BV Oice Locations
BV Technical Assessments
Headquarters
MO
IL
TX
AZ
CA
AK
NM
NV
UT
CO
KS
OK
OR
WA
ID
MT
WY
ND
SD
NE
MN
IA
WI
AR
LA
OH
WV VA
SC
TN
MS AL GA
FL
MI
IN
NH
NJ
MD
DE
RI
ME
KY
PA
NY
CT
HI
VT
NC
2. FIRMS BACKGROUND, QUALIFICATIONS, AND EXPERIENCE
Profile
Bureau Veritas is a professional services consulting firm
providing comprehensive architectural, engineering,
energy, and environmental solutions. Our team includes
over 800 building professionals nationwide, including
Registered Architects, Professional Engineers, Certified
Energy Managers, Project Managers, Environmental
Professionals, Building Systems Consultants, and Code
Compliance Experts.
Annually, Bureau Veritas conducts thousands of
assessments for Multifamily, Commercial, Industrial,
Government, and Educational clients. Having successfully
completed billions of square feet of building assessments,
we have developed a proven and efficient methodology for
the performance of field assessments and data collection.
Bureau Veritas’ recommendations are based on knowledge
of property conditions, life-cycle analysis, regulations, and
client objectives. Bureau Veritas’ subject matter expertise
and understanding of buildings, parks, and property sites
forms the foundation on which we team with clients to
create and implement facility and portfolio management
solutions.
ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES
•Accessibility Compliance
•Facility Condition Assessments
•Capital Planning Reports
•Equipment and Asset Inventory
•Barcoding, QR Coding, and Tagging
•CMMS Consulting
•Preventive Maintenance Plans
•Space Analysis Studies
•Energy Audits and Modeling
•Commissioning (Cx and Rx)
•Construction Monitoring
•Project Management
•Plan and Document Review
What We Do
Acquisitions
Finance
Capital
Planning
Asset
Management
Construction
& Project
Management
Disposition
3
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
City of Eastvale, CA
ADA Assessment and Transition Plan
City of Chino, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
ADA Assessment & Facility Condition
Assessment
City of Mountain View, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
Hayward Area Park & Recreation District, CA
ADA Transition Plan, Facility Condition
Assessment, and Energy Audit
City of Orange, CA
Facility Condition Assessment and ADA
Transition Plan
Ambrose Parks District, CA
Facility Condition Assessment / ADA Transition
Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
ADA Assessment and Transition Plan
City of Napa, CA
ADA Assessment and Transition Plan, FCA,
Inventory
City of Brea, CA
ADA Assessment and Transition Plan
City of Garden Grove, CA
ADA Assessment and Transition Plan, FCA
San Bernardino County Transportation
Agency, CA
PROW Assessments
ERIK PILLER
PROJECT EXECUTIVE
Mr. Piller has 22 years of experience in client coordination of assessment, architectural-
engineering, energy consulting, and construction phase services. He has been involved with
projects of similar scope to the proposed project. As Project Executive, Mr. Piller is responsible
for overseeing all contractual aspects of the project and will be available to meet with the
client for the duration of the project on an as-needed basis. He will have primary responsibility
for defining the scope of engagement, and will meet regularly with BV’s Program Manager
and Assessment Team to assure that the client’s needs are being met, and that the project is
adequately staffed, running smoothly, and on schedule.
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 22
Industry Experience
Government
K-12 Education
Multi-Family Housing
Higher Education
Industrial
Office
Retail
Hospitality
Resumes
4
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
City of Chino, CA
ADA Assessment & Facility Condition
Assessment
City of Eastvale, CA
ADA Assessment and Transition Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
ADA Assessment & Facility Condition
Assessment
City of Eastvale, CA
ADA Assessment
City of West Covina, CA
ADA Assessment and Transition Plan
City of El Segundo, CA
ADA Assessment & Facility Condition
Assessment
City of Pomona, CA
ADA Assessment
City of Los Angeles, CA
ADA Assessment
City of Palmdale, CA
ADA Assessment & Facility Condition
Assessment
Hayward Area Park & Recreation
District, CA
ADA Transition Plan, Facility Condition
Assessment, and Energy Audit
City of South Lake Tahoe, CA
ADA Assessment and Transition Plan
City of Aliso Viejo, CA
ADA Assessment and Transition Plan
San Bernardino County Transportation
Agency, CA
PROW Assessments
MICHAEL CUNNIFF
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 22
Education
Bachelor of Science, Architectural/Building Engineering Technology, New England Institute of
Technology
PROGRAM MANAGER
Mr. Cunniff is an ADA Senior Project Manager with over 20 years of experience in building
sciences and accessibility subject matter. Mr. Cunniff is well-versed in conducting self-
evaluations of programmatic barriers, including Title II and Title III regulations. As Program
Manager, he is responsible for the schedule and technical content of BV’s work.
5
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
City of Chino, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Eastvale, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of El Segundo, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Corona, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of West Covina, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
John Wayne Airport, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
County of San Bernardino CA
CASP Assessment/Review
City of Palmdale, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Pomona, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Industry, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
San Bernardino County Transportation
Agency, CA
PROW Assessments
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Garden Grove, CA
ADA Assessment, FCA
BRYON SCOTT, ADAC
Education
Bachelor of Science, Business Administration,
University of Maryland
License & Certification
ADA Coordinator and Trainer
ADA Coordinator Training Certification
Program, University of Missouri
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 21
QUALITY ASSURANCE MANAGER
Mr. Scott is a Lead Project Manager with BV. He has 21 years of Construction Management
experience and is a Certified ADA Coordinator, and uses this knowledge to identify ADA barriers,
minimize litigation risk, improve customer accessibility, and enhance customer satisfaction.
Mr. Scott is a regular speaker at ADA Coordinators’ meetings on Title II and Title III subjects. As
Quality Assurance Manager, he will assist the Program Manager by providing QA/QC review on
the data collection and reports.
6
JUSTIN VANG, CASp
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 10PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
City of Chino, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Eastvale, CA
ADA Assessment and Transition Plan
City of Mountain View, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Rancho Cucamonga, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of West Covina, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Eastvale, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Maywood, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Palmdale, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Garden Grove, CA
ADA Assessment & Facility Assessment
City of South Lake Tahoe, CA
ADA Assessment
Colorado Parks & Wildlife, CO
ADA Assessment
City of Aspen, CO
ADA Assessment & Facility Assessment
Metro Parks Tacoma, WA
ADA Assessment
City of Sherwood, OR
ADA Assessment
Education
Master of Science, Civil/Structural Engineering, California
State University
Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering, University of
California
License & Certification
Certified Access Specialist | CASp-845
TRANSITION PLAN MANAGER
Mr. Vang is a Transition Plan Manager with 10 years of experience and is a Certified Access
Specialist (CASp). He conducts and leads teams for Facility Condition Assessments, ADA
Assessments, and other related services. He supervises and trains junior ADA professionals,
architects, and engineers in conducting facility assessments. Mr. Vang will oversee the
transition plan.
7
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
City of Tracy, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Alameda, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Chino, CA
ADA Assessment
City of South Lake Tahoe, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
Yuba City Unified School District, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
Beaverton School District, OR
Facility Accessibility Assessment
PHILIP SMITH, CASP
ASSESSMENT TEAM
Education
AA, Behavioral & Social Science, Modesto Junior
College
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 19
License & Certification
Certified Access Specialist | CA | CASp-1018
Building Plans Examiner/Inspector/Code
Specialist | 8291181
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
City of Chino, CA
ADA Assessment
City of Mountain View, CA
ADA Assessment
City of Industry, CA
ADA Assessment
City of West Covina, CA
ADA Assessment
State of Oregon Dept of Education, OR
ADA Assessment
Colorado Parks & Wildlife, CO
ADA Assessment
ABEL MACHADO, CASP
ASSESSMENT TEAM
Education
AA, Architectural Technology, Cerritos Community
College
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 18
License & Certification
Certified Access Specialist | CA | CASp-145
8
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
City of Tracy, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Alameda, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Chino, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of West Covina, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
South Salt Lake Tahoe, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Los Angeles, CA
ADA Assessments
TIMOTHY GRIFFITH, CASP
ASSESSMENT TEAM
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 30+
Education
MS, Sports & Business Management, American Public University
BS, Sports & Heath Sciences, American Public University
AA, Building & Construction Management, Diablo Valley College
License & Certification
Certified Access Specialist | CASp-1007
PROJECT EXPERIENCE:
City of Chino, CA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Pomona, CA
ADA Consulting
Hayward Area Rec. & Park District, CA
ADA Transition Plan, FCA, and Energy Audit
City of Napa, CA
FCA, Inventory, ADA Transition Plan
Washington Parks and Rec. Commission
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
City of Redmond, WA
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
Ben Franklin Transit, Richland, WA
ADA Consulting
BRIAN MANTERNACH, CASP
ASSESSMENT TEAM
Education
Building Materials Management, Northeast Iowa
Community College
YEARS OF EXPERIENCE: 30+
License & Certification
Certified Access Specialist | CA | CASp-851
Accessibility Inspector/Plans Examiner | #8010569
9
3. REFERENCES OF CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
Since 1986, BV has proven relevant experience with the codes and regulations applicable to the City’s project. BV’s history
of successful performance demonstrates a competency in the following code/regulatory areas:
Projects completed by BV similar in scope to the City’s project are as follows:
•2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design
•ADAAG / ABA / UFAS
•2009 ICC/ANSI A117.1
•Local Building Codes
•ADA/504 Compliance
•PROWAG
•BOCA (Certified Inspectors on staff)
•NFPA
•AHERA
•USEPA Standards
•OSHA Codes and Regulations
•ASHRAE Standards related to Indoor Air Quality and
Design
CLIENT STATE SERVICES YEAR
City of Westminster CA ADA Transition Plan Just Awarded
City of Pleasanton CA ADA Transition Plan Just Awarded
City of Glendale CA ADA Transition Plan Just Awarded
City of Oxnard CA ADA Transition Plan Just Awarded
City of Irvine CA ADA Transition Plan 2026
City of Lancaster CA ADA Transition Plan 2026
Monrovia Unified School District CA ADA Transition Plan 2026
City of Menifee CA ADA Transition Plan 2025
County of Kern CA ADA Transition Plan 2025
City of West Covina CA ADA Transition Plan 2025
City of Mountain View CA ADA Transition Plan 2024
City of Eastvale CA ADA Transition Plan 2024
Pasadena Unified School District CA ADA Transition Plan 2024
City of Chino CA ADA Transition Plan 2024
City of Alameda CA ADA Transition Plan 2023
Yuba City Unified School District CA ADA Transition Plan 2023
City of Hermosa Beach CA ADA Consulting 2022
City of South Lake Tahoe CA ADA Transition Plan 2022
San Bernardino County CA ADA Transition Plan 2022
Sonoma County CA FCA & ADA Assessment 2021
City of Tracy CA ADA Transition Plan 2021
State of Washington Parks & Recreation WA ADA Transition Plan 2020
City of Napa CA FCA& ADA Assessment 2020
City of Redmond WA ADA Assessment 2020
City of Lexington NC ADA Assessment 2020
State of Hawaii HI ADA Study 2019
University of Nevada, Reno NV ADA Assessment 2019
Hayward Recreation and Park District CA ADA Assessment 2019
City of El Segundo CA FCA and ADA Assessment 2019 - 2022
City of Garden Grove CA FCA and ADA Assessment 2019
10
References
Below is the contact information for each of our references. Profiles for our reference projects, including a description of
the scope and other project details, are included on the following pages of this proposal.
City of Chino
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
Lisa Almilli, MA, ADAC
Accessibility Coordinator
Development Services, Accessibility Division
13220 Central Avenue
Chino, CA 91710
(909)334-3524
lalmilli@cityofchino.org
City of Rancho Cucamonga
ADA Assessment & Transition Plan
Ty Quaintance
Facilities Superintendent
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909)774-4102 x4148
Ty.quaintance@cityofrc.us
City of Eastvale
ADA Self-Evaluation & Transition Plan
Yurhi Choi
12363 Limonite Ave
Eastvale, CA 91752
(951)790-7326
ychoi@eastvaleca.gov
*The proposed management team is the same team that successfully completed the above projects.
11
CITY OF CHINO
ADA ASSESSMENT & TRANSITION PLAN
The City of Chino, CA entered into a professional services agreement
with Bureau Veritas (BV) to provide a comprehensive evaluation of
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility compliance in three
areas: public rights-of-way for facilities, City policies and practices, and
City parks and buildings.
This project consisted of conducting a self-evaluation and preparing
an ADA Transition Plan to include identified physical barriers to
accessibility, the methods to improve accessibility, the estimated costs
to remediating the identified barriers, and a schedule to achieve ADA
compliance.
The City of Chino is 29.7 square miles with approximately 262 centerline
miles of streets. BV developed a Citywide reference map using GIS for
curb ramps including, but not limited to, an associated database with
condition data, ramp type, slope, landing, detectable warning surface
and other compliance information. The Citywide reference map also
used GIS for sidewalks and condition data of sidewalks (uplifts, cracks,
width, repair priority).
PROJECT PROFILE
LOCATION
Chino, CA
SERVICE
ADA Title II Survey / CASp
Transition Plan
PROW Surveys
Program & Policy Review
Public Outreach
Website Review
SIZE
42 Facilities
45 Parks
451,991 SF
440 Miles of Sidewalks
3473 Curb Ramps
159 Traffic Signals
90 Transit Stops
COMPLETION
2023
REFERENCE
Lisa Almilli, MA, ADAC
Accessibility Coordinator
Development Services,
Accessibility Division
City of Chino
13220 Central Avenue
Chino, CA 91710
(909) 334-3524
lalmilli@cityofchino.org
12
CITY OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA
ADA ASSESSMENT & TRANSITION PLAN
PROJECT PROFILE
LOCATION
Rancho Cucamonga, CA
SERVICE
ADA Assessment
ADA Transition Plan
SIZE
554,063 SF
53 Facilities
13.5 miles of Sidewalk
3,000 Curb Ramps
FACILITY TYPE
Parks & Trails
Sports Centers, AAA Ballpark
Community & Senior Centers
Libraries
Fire Stations & Police Facilities
Corp Yard & Support Facilities
Public Rights-of-Way
COMPLETION
2021
REFERENCE
Ty Quaintance
Facilities Superintendent
City of Rancho Cucamonga
10500 Civic Center Drive
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91730
(909) 774-4102 x4148
Ty.quaintance@cityofrc.us
Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC (BV) worked with Owen
Group to perform ADA Title III assessments for the City of Rancho
Cucamonga. The facilities assessed included 7 fire stations, police
facilities, 31 parks, 100 miles of bike paths and trails, sports and
recreation facilities, community and senior centers, public libraries, an
animal shelter, and support facilities. The project scope also included
the assessment of public rights-of-way (PROW): 13.5 miles of sidewalk,
3,000 curb ramps, 207 traffic signals, and 1,200 parking stalls.
The goal of the assessment was to define the City's ADA deficiencies
and develop a transition plan to bring the City's facilities into
compliance with Federal ADA regulations.
The assessment team developed a methodology for collecting facility
data addressing such concerns as non-compliance, condition, and
future facility management and operational needs. The team compiled
a comprehensive inventory of City buildings, noting such attributes as
description, size, condition, code, and ADA compliance.
The team provided a report detailing the findings at each facility,
a database of the findings, and recommended a transition plan to
implement over the next 10 years. Each report and database included
a detailed description of each deficiency. The report was organized
to include a narrative description of the deficiencies, applicable
guidelines, viable corrective action, location description, and color
digital photos of all recorded deficiencies.
This evaluation of PROW identified and recorded any gaps in
connectivity, potential safety hazards, obstructions, missing curb
ramps, and general noncompliance with accessibility regulations,
including the following:
• Assessment of the Pedestrian Right-of-Way (Sidewalks)
• Assessment of Curb Ramps
• Assessment of Pedestrian Crossings, Signalized Intersections,
Un-signalized Intersections
13
CITY OF EASTVALE
ADA SELF-EVALUATION & TRANSITION PLAN
The City of Eastvale is a community of approximately 73,000 in
Riverside County encompassing 13.2 square miles.
Bureau Veritas was awarded a contract to provide a comprehensive
evaluation of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility
compliance in three areas: City policies and practices, and City
buildings, and public rights-of-way facilities.
The ADA Transition Plan will provide the City of Eastvale a multi-phased
roadmap to efficiently mitigate the deficiencies and achieve ADA
compliance, which will be done in subsequent phases.
The project consisted of conducting a self-evaluation and preparing
an ADA Transition Plan to include identified physical barriers to
accessibility, the methods to improve accessibility, the estimated
costs to remediating the identified barriers, and a schedule to achieve
ADA compliance. The self-evaluation and ADA transition plan identifies
existing physical barriers to accessibility as well as describe the steps to
be taken, along with estimated costs, to ensure that City facilities and
public right-of-way elements are made accessible to all individuals.
PROJECT PROFILE
LOCATION
Eastvale, CA
SERVICE
ADA Transition Plan
PROW Surveys
Program & Policy Review
Public Outreach
Website Review
CAD Diagrams
SIZE
4 Facilities
25,000 SF
341 Miles of Sidewalk
2500 Curb Ramps
FACILITY TYPE
Public Rights-of-Way
Fire Station
City Hall
COMPLETION
2024
REFERENCE
Yurhi Choi
City of Eastvale
12363 Limonite Ave
Eastvale, CA 91752
(951) 790-7326
ychoi@eastvaleca.gov
14
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY
ADA ASSESSMENT & TRANSITION PLAN
Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC (BV) was on a team lead
by Fehr & Peers to provide San Bernardino County Transportation
Authority a sidewalk connectivity plan subsidized by a Caltrans grant.
The data collection was a sample of Public Right of Way (PROW) for 24
cities and the county.
BV systematically surveyed the sidewalk and street crossing surface
environment for compliance with state, local, and Federal accessibility
standards. BV documented changes in level, horizontal openings,
upheavals, and other pathway events that may have posed a barrier or
potential hazard in the sidewalk and street crossing environment. All
major impediments and obstructions were recorded.
BV measured the grade and cross slope of each element of the curb
ramp. The barriers of each curb ramp or the lack of a curb ramp was
documented. BV captured deficiency data for transit stops, signalized
intersections, and un-signalized intersections, including access to
pedestrian pushbuttons and the condition and presence of crosswalk
markings.
The sidewalk data collected was integrated, along with various 3rd
party data, into the pathVu data analytics platform and was processed
to provide a characterization of a span of the sidewalk. Condition,
grade, and curb ramp information were all combined to provide a
comprehensive view of a walkability network to enable engineering
firms and municipalities to prioritize and spec the sidewalk repairs and
upgrades.
PROJECT PROFILE
LOCATION
San Bernardino County, CA
SERVICE
Pedestrian Sidewalk
Connectivity Plan
Public Right of Way (PROW)
ADA Survey
SIZE
750 Miles of Sidewalk
2500 Curb ramps
COMPLETION
2021
REFERENCE
Paul Herrmann, PE
Fehr & Peers
100 Pringle Avenue
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
(925)930-7100
p.herrmann@fehrandpeers.com
15
COUNTY OF KERN
ADA ASSESSMENT & TRANSITION PLAN
Kern County engaged Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC
(BV) to conduct a comprehensive Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA) Assessment and Transition Plan, a critical initiative to ensure
accessibility across the county’s extensive infrastructure.
The project involved a detailed assessment of county policies,
programs, facilities, parks, parking lots, streets, intersections, and
sidewalks to identify existing obstacles and develop a strategic
plan for compliance with ADA requirements. Bureau Veritas
conducted thorough field investigations, evaluated current policies
and practices, and prepared a comprehensive transition plan that
included methodologies for barrier identification, cost estimates for
remediation, implementation schedules, and procedures for ongoing
monitoring and updates.
The project includes training county staff in ADA compliance, helping
to designate an ADA Coordinator and departmental liaisons, and
providing guidance on performing field investigations, preparing
compliance assessment reports, and developing internal procedures
for ongoing accessibility management. The goal is to create a
sustainable framework that ensures Kern County’s commitment to
accessibility extends well beyond the initial assessment.
PROJECT PROFILE
LOCATION
Kern, CA
SERVICE
ADA Assessment
Transition Plan
Public Right-of-Way
SIZE
320 Facilities
5.2 MM SF
1,900+ Miles of Sidewalk
FACILITY TYPE
Fire & Sheriff Stations
Libraries
Detention / Correctional
Essential Facilities
Parks & Rec Facilities
Administration Buildings
COMPLETION
Ongoing
REFERENCE
Eric Nisbett
Deputy Chief Financial Officer
County of Kern
1115 Truxtun Avenue, 5th Floor
Bakersfield, CA 93301
(661) 868-3000
nisbette@kerncounty.com
16
4. COMPLETE PRICING LIST
The following fees include all costs associated with travel, lodging, car rental, food, tools, equipment, and all other
miscellaneous expenses applicable to the work related to this project.
BV will submit a monthly invoice inclusive of all services performed during that period. The per site fee will be established per the
schedule of values provided at the program kick-off, and invoiced at the billing milestones stated below. Invoices will be payable within
30 days of receipt:
Completion of onsite assessments: 50% of per site fee
Delivery of Draft Reports: 45% of per site fee
Delivery of Final Reports: 5% of per site fee
Upon receipt of each monthly invoice, the amount due per billing milestone is fully collectible. Please forward payments to: Accounting
Department, Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC, PO Box 74007289, Chicago, IL 60674-7289 or contact BV-invoicing@BVNA.com
to pay via credit card or to receive wiring instructions. Please ensure that BV Proposal or invoice number is clearly identified on all
payments and correspondence for proper credit.
Please submit all draft comments to BV within 60 days of draft delivery. Unless otherwise communicated, BV will consider all drafts
approved for finalization after 60 days, and the remaining balance due will be invoiced.
17
5. COMPLIMENTARY SERVICES AND PRICING
BV offers the following services in addition to ADA services - many can be perform concurrently with the ADA project.
ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES
•Accessibility Compliance
•Facility Condition Assessments
•Capital Planning Reports
•Equipment and Asset Inventory
•Barcoding, QR Coding, and Tagging
•CMMS Consulting
•Preventive Maintenance Plans
•Space Analysis Studies
•Energy Audits and Modeling
•Commissioning (Cx and Rx)
•Construction Monitoring
•Project Management
•Plan and Document Review
Below are our hourly rates:
HOURLY RATES
Team Role Hourly Rate ($)
Project Executive $190.00
Program Manager $140.00
Project Manager I (PE/RA)$120.00
Project Manager II (PE/RA)$130.00
Quality Control Manager $135.00
Technical Report Reviewer $115.00
Administrative $80.00
18
Bureau Veritas’ Team includes Professional Engineers,
Registered Architects, and Accessibility Professionals with
an average of over 25 years of relevant experience. These
life cycle subject matter experts coordinate logistics,
conduct comprehensive site assessments, analyze
collected data, provide asset management strategies,
create capital planning studies, and develop facility
condition reports. Bureau Veritas also has an internal
information technology group that migrates the field data
and findings into CMMS platforms and other City database
applications.
Erik Piller | Project Executive
Mr. Piller will oversee all contractual aspects of the project
and be available to meet with the City for the duration of
the project on an as-needed basis. He will have primary
responsibility for defining the scope of engagement, and
will meet regularly with Bureau Veritas’ Program Manager
and Assessment Team to assure that the City’s needs are
being met, and that the project is adequately staffed,
running smoothly, and on schedule.
Michael Cunniff | Program Manager
Mr. Cunniff will be the primary point of contact for the
City throughout the duration of the project. He will work
with the Assessment Team and the City to assure project
success. Mr. Cunniff will be responsible for the assessment
team’s overall performance, delivery of the project, and will
work with City staff to develop the implementation plan
based on the results.
Bryon Scott, ADAC | Quality Assurance Manager
Mr. Scott will oversee the project, assuring technical,
process, and content quality. He will have direct
management responsibility for all technical personnel,
which will allow for quick and effective implementation
of quality assurance measures both at inception and
throughout the duration of the project.
Justin Vang, CASp | Transition Plan Manager
Mr. Vang will oversee the creation of the Transition Plan for
the City’s project. He will be available to meet with the City
on an agreed-upon basis to ensure Transition Plan success.
Assessment Team
The Assessment Team is comprised of professional
engineers having direct experience in conducting ADA
Assessments. They will observe and describe building
systems and components, identify physical deficiencies,
and formulate recommendations to remedy the
deficiencies.
ff
PROJECT EXECUTIVE
Michael Cunni
PROGRAM MANAGER
ASSESSMENT TEAM
Bryon Scott, ADAC
QUALITY ASSURANCE
MANAGER
PROJECT
ORGANIZATION
CHART
TRANSITION PLAN
MANAGER
Justin Vang, CASp
Resumes
Resumes for these professionals are included on the
following pages.
6. STAFFING AND PROJECT ORGANIZATION
19
The following section outlines our project management
approach.
1.PROGRAM MANAGER - BV will have a dedicated
Program Manager as the single point of contact for
coordination of work throughout the contract term.
The Program Manager will be assisted by a logistics
team who will be responsible for confirming each day’s
site visits. The Program Manager will conduct regular
progress meetings to review each week’s upcoming
schedule and to review any issues identified in the
prior week’s work.
2.KICKOFF AND PILOT - The Program Manager and
the Project Executive will ensure the work meets all
requirements of the RFP. At the kickoff meeting—the
first meeting after award—BV will walk through the
entire scope of work with the City’s project team.
Where scope of work items are unclear or ambiguous,
the team will consult with the City and a clarifying
memo will become part of the project record. During
the kickoff, sample deliverables will be reviewed and
tentatively agreed upon. In order to ensure clarity on
the scope, a pilot project will be scheduled in the first
week after the kickoff. The pilot is an opportunity for
us to prepare our team and calibrate our field process.
More importantly, it gives us an opportunity to deliver
a report for review that meets the full scope of work.
The City will be given an opportunity to review and
comment on this deliverable, and once all parties are
in agreement the field assessments will begin. We will
deliver reports for review as they are completed.
3.SCHEDULE - BV will ensure the work is finished on
schedule by preparing a complete project schedule.
We will update the schedule weekly. One issue that can
impact the schedule is having access to the buildings
to be assessed. We will schedule 2 weeks out with any
required notifications to building staff—and 48 hours
in advance of each assessment we will confirm with
building staff and escorts.
4.QUALITY - We will apply our 5-point quality plan to
ensure quality during all phases of the project.
a.Overall project technical review: Includes scope
review-review of field instructions consistent
with the scope–review of existing reports and
information prior to field work commencing.
b.Initial Report reviews: Review by senior staff of
each report prior to submission of draft. BV will have
dedicated review staff working solely on report
reviews in order to ensure consistence in results.
c.Quality Assurance of Field work: The program
manager will ensure a sample of sites are reviewed
and compared to submitted results.
d.Database Validation: Aggregated results of
the field work will be reviewed, and anomalies
identified will be flagged for additional review. This
insures consistency across the entire portfolio and
can often identify incorrect cost estimates, or areas
where field observations are not correctly identified
in the reports.
e.Final Quality Review: Before final reports are
delivered, a final review of each report will be done
by a senior manager dedicated to the project.
5.TEAM RESOURCES - BV will have a dedicated
Program Manager responsible for managing all day-to-
day activities of the team. If it is necessary to replace
a team member during the project, the Program
Manager will submit resumes to the City for approval
prior to any field activities for additional field staff.
6.COMMUNICATION - BV understands communication
is one of the keys to a successful project. We will
establish a weekly meeting time at the project kickoff.
Notes will be taken and submitted the same day as
the weekly meeting. If issues are encountered in the
field, they will be communicated on the same day and
summarized in the weekly report.
7.RISK IDENTIFICATION & MANAGEMENT - Our field
staff are trained to communicate if they feel there is
any situation on site that puts them at risk and will
communicate those to the Program Manager.
Management Plan
20
Bureau Veritas’ Quality Control Plan was prepared to
provide a secondary review of all documents, assessments,
and cost estimates before they are issued to the City. The
plan is intended to guide our activities and to help ensure
we meet City expectations and requirements. Our plan is
flexible and can be administered as it is presented or, if
desired, we can tailor it further to accommodate specific
needs and expectations. The Quality Control Plan includes
a series of independent reviews at specific checkpoints
within our assessment services program.
Bureau Veritas’ Quality Assurance Manager, provides
general oversight to the Project from the perspective
of assuring technical, process, and content quality. He
has direct management responsibility for all technical
personnel, allowing for quick and effective implementation
of quality assurance measures, both at project inception
and throughout the project.
The Quality Assurance Manager conducts spot checks and
random report reviews by selecting a sample of assets
in each phase of the process including the assessment/
fieldwork stages, report preparations stages, review stages,
and data validation (software) stages. The sample size
for the review is statistically determined using the size of
the total population, the phase of the product, and the
condition of the asset (expected variation). The Quality
Assurance Manager may assign various personnel to the
assist in the review at each of these phases. These team
members are cross-functional and multi-disciplined and
have not contributed to the project being reviewed. Team
members that have contributed to the project will be
assigned peer review for a subset of the assets.
The Quality Assurance Manager has the authority to
issue the “Stop Work” order at any time in the process,
specifically if he feels the protocol, standards, or
requirements are not being met.
BUREAU VERITAS’ 5-POINT QUALITY CONTROL PLAN
1.Overall Technical Condition Assessment Review
•Review the Assessment Schedule for accuracy and
timing;
•Ensure adequate time at the properties is provided
to each Field Observer;
•Review the proposed scope of the assessments and
the timing for City meetings during the assessments;
•Develop a quality assurance checklist detailing
significant items to be reviewed and tracked;
•Select a sampling of sites to be reviewed by the
Quality Assurance Manager; and
•Develop a quality control schedule, including
milestones, in conjunction with the overall project
schedule.
2.Report Reviews
•Each draft report will be reviewed by the Program
Manager or a licensed Engineer for completeness,
accuracy, and readability. Senior Engineers or
Architects will review technical conclusions before
the draft reports are submitted to the City. The
Quality Assurance Manager will assign additional
cross-functional personnel to the review team.
3.Quality Assurance of Fieldwork
•The Program Manager or Quality Assurance Manager
will review a sampling of identified sites against our
draft report by performing the following:
–Facility site review;
–Review quality of barrier identification through
visual observation and/or any provided
documentation;
–Review the completeness and accuracy of the
Assessment report; and
–Complete a quality control report per facility
visited detailing any material discrepancies
between the reported information and the
observed barriers.
4.Database Population and Validation Review
•This step includes the review of the Database
Application for any discrepancies between the
reported information and the information residing
in the database. The Quality Assurance Manager will
review randomly selected items in the cost estimate
documentation. The cost estimate documentation
for barrier improvement will be reviewed to
determine their accuracy and completeness.
5.Final Quality Assurance Review
•This final step includes a review of the Assessment
reports by property for completeness and accuracy,
using the checklist developed in the first step.
Before the final reports are submitted to the City,
the documentation will be reviewed against any
comments made by the City to ensure that all City
comments are addressed in the final reports.
Quality Assurance / Quality Control
21
7. SUBCONTRACTING SERVICES
BV does not plan on utilizing subcontractors for this project. This will maximize City savings and facilitate project
continuity.
8. DISCLOSURES
We do not have any alleged significant prior or ongoing agreement failure, any civil or criminal litigation or
investigation pending, which involved BV or in which BV has been judged guilty or liable within the last five (5) years to
disclose.
22
General Statement of Understanding
Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC (BV) understands
that it will provide consulting services to ensure the City
of La Quinta (“The City”) complies with all aspects of
the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), the Federal
ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG), American Barriers
Act (ABA), State Building Code, and local accessibility
regulations with regards to its programs, services, public
buildings, facilities and parks, exterior amenities, and
paths of travel. The work will ultimately culminate in the
production of an ADA Transition Plan, which will include
a schedule of improvements necessary to meet the ADA,
the State, and local accessibility requirements, associated
order of magnitude cost estimates for barrier removal,
a prioritized list of improvements, and a timeline for
completion of needed improvements or modifications.
EXPERIENCE WITH STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES
BV has extensive experience and expertise with ADA
Accessibility Standards, Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility
Guidelines, and State Building Codes, which are relevant
to this project. Our assessors and management staff
have project experience in multiple states and locales
nationwide, and apply the 2010 ADA Standards for
Accessible Design, the current ADA accessibility guidelines
(ADAAG), and other state and local building codes
as required by laws, statutes and ordinances. When
prioritizing barrier removal, we will follow the order of
preference advised by the Department of Justice in Title II
requirements, or as modified through agreement with the
City and by public survey results. BV is experienced with
the application of the program access test defined in Title
II 35.150(b), and understands that not all individual barriers
must be removed, but the overall program must be made
accessible.
Proposed Project Approach
The scope of the work, as defined by the City, includes:
•ADA Self Evaluation
–Physical Assessment of Facilities and Sites
–Accessibility Transition Plan
•Program Access and Policy Review
•Public Outreach Meetings (2)
•Public Rights-of-Way (PROW) Evaluation: public
sidewalks and curb ramps
The City has requested services for:
•Eighteen (18) public building facilities
•Recreation facilities: public parks, trails
•Public Rights of Way (PROW) (121 miles of sidewalks)
BV will complete the following:
•Conduct comprehensive accessibility assessment and
inventory of facilities identified on the Buildings/Site list.
•Ensure compliance with applicable standards,
regulations, and codes for accessibility
•Perform site visits to observe, document, and
photograph specific conditions and modifications of
facilities and components subject to federal, state, and
local access requirements.
•Assessment of the content and location of the
City’s programs, services, policies, training and
communication practices.
•Create public outreach to ensure public input into the
transition planning process, including public meetings
and public survey.
•Create criteria to prioritize facilities and/or categories of
work to support a phased approach to implementation
of the ADA Transition Plan.
•Establish order of magnitude (pre-planning level)
estimated costs for each barrier removal necessary to
make facilities accessible.
•Prepare interim and final presentations of findings and
recommendations to the City.
•Deliver draft and final reports per protocol established
by the City.
•Maintain the electronic database the City can use to
track barrier removals as each is completed, which
serves as a living Transition Plan.
APPROACH
BV will conduct a kick-off meeting with the City to define
communication channels, define the scope of work, and
to review the facility and program lists. Discussions will
include recent and proposed capital improvements and
available programs at each of the facilities. BV will note
public use patterns and prioritization of the facilities and
programs.
Prior to the kick-off meeting, BV will provide a pre-
assessment questionnaire for each site and other
documentation. Documents requested, if readily available,
are:
•Prior accessibility transition plans or self-evaluations
•Site plans / floor plans
•Identification of any/all historic structures
•Description of each facility’s purpose
•As-built drawings (with dates of construction)
•Current reasonable accommodation policy
•Intersection / street / curb plans / previous sidewalk
survey
9. EXPLANATION OF METHODOLOGY
23
The initial discussions with City staff will include the
following elements:
•Roles and lines of communication between and within
both the City and BV.
•Protocols for interaction between all parties throughout
the project: Contact information should include the
office and cell numbers for a minimum of 2+ contacts
with the appropriate City staff and BV.
•Field assessment logistics: Normally, BV does not require
escorts to perform the field assessments, except where
escorts may be required within restricted areas. Outline
areas of City’s highest priority for any assessment to be
completed during any training phases, likely complexity
of assessment data processing, efficient workflow each
day of the assessment, and City requests.
•Protocol for handling paths not clearly designated on
the map, not collected due to construction, or otherwise
deemed inaccessible. (PROW Survey)
•Strategies for connectivity between isolated urbanized
areas. (PROW Survey)
Field schedules and facility management interviews will
be conducted once the schedule is approved by the City.
Once the field schedule is approved, BV will deploy trained
accessibility assessors with backgrounds in Landscape
Architecture, Architecture, Engineering, and Building
Systems for facility assessments. All field resources
assigned have been professionally trained in accessibility
assessments and have performed numerous assessments.
Program Access and Policy Review
BV is experienced with the program access test defined
in Title II 35.150(b), and realizes that not all amenities are
required to be accessible. BV’s goal is to assist the City in
providing the most economically viable improvements
for its users. Through consultation with staff, stakeholder
surveys and our field observations, BV will provide barrier
removal recommendations to improve the amenities
necessary to comply with the applicable standards to
provide program access.
An assessment of the City’s programs will be performed.
The United States Department of Justice defines
“programs” as the “programs, services and facilities” of a
Title II entity. The current status of the City’s programs as
defined by the DOJ will be evaluated through discussions
with City staff and a review of documentation. The goal
mandated by Title II of the ADA is to ensure that individuals
with disabilities are not excluded from services, programs,
and activities because buildings are inaccessible or other
assistance is not available. Steps needed to make programs
accessible to disabled individuals will be detailed, such as,
providing sign language interpreters to enable an individual
with a disability to obtain the service, or providing benefits
at an alternative accessible location in order to ensure that
individuals with disabilities receive the benefits or services.
BV will meet with the designated representatives of the
City to gather information from the various departments
regarding the access opportunities or problems which
have arisen in the past. BV will evaluate the issues and
experiences with respect to the provision of services to
people with disabilities.
A program survey will address issues with respect to the
delivery of accessible programs and services. A policy and
program review provides a greater scope of information
about structural changes required for barrier removal.
The list of public programs and methods of communication
with the public has not been provided to BV as part of the
City’s request for a proposal. As such, BV has limited the
review of said programs and communications to one-
hundred (100) man hours. BV will work with the City to
prioritize the review to those programs with the highest
impact to the community.
It is possible that the program assessment will determine
that providing full access to a given program, service or
activity is simply not possible. In such a case, BV will work
with the City to determine if providing full access to the
program would be an “undue financial and administrative
burden.” Determinations regarding a finding of an “undue
financial and administrative burden” require specific
documentation as set forth in the Title II regulations.
Public Outreach
Community engagement is an essential part of creating a
successful Transition Plan and Policy Procedure Guideline.
BV with work with the City to seek input from Staff, the
general public, and the accessible community. This input
is critical for understanding how facilities are actually being
used and how to increase usability. Early engagement
increases community awareness, engagement after the
draft Transition Plan increases buy-in from the community,
especially those advocating for accessibility.
The community engagement results and the City’s ADA
Compliance Team’s advice will be incorporated into the
Transition Plan. The Transition Plan can establish phases
of barrier removal, without a calendar timeframe. To the
extent that a facility, program, service, or activity is not
going to be fully accessible to and usable by people with
disabilities in the immediate future, we will work with
the ADA Compliance Team to determine the best interim
procedure or policy in order to enhance accessibility to the
maximum extent possible.
24
BV has experience with public outreach, including public
input to the transition plan. Public outreach must be
conducted prior to development of the Transition Plan, in
order to determine user priorities and program opinion.
BV will arrange for and conduct a public outreach meeting
for the community at large. BV will reach out to local
disability rights and service organizations for their valuable
community input.
BV’s goal is to assist the City in providing the most
economically viable improvements for its users. The
results of the initial public outreach and the advice of
the City’s ADA Compliance Team will be incorporated
into the Transition Plan. BV will provide barrier removal
recommendations to improve the amenities necessary to
comply with the applicable standards to provide facility and
program access.
The ADA requires that a public entity solicit and allow for
the participation of interested persons in the development
of a Transition Plan. The public outreach effort for the
Draft Transition Plan will include advertisements in local
newspapers in the weeks leading up to a public meeting
for presentation of the draft Transition Plan. It will be
the responsibility of the City to post notice of the public
meeting on the City’s website. An example of survey
results from public sessions is included below.
Digital Accessibility Review
Bureau Veritas will conduct a thorough accessibility
audit, identify non-compliance with the current WCAG
standards within the City’s digital ecosystem, and deliver
both remediation recommendations and a comprehensive
Digital Accessibility Transition Plan. Working closely with
City staff, the firm will establish a strategic roadmap to guide
the organization toward full compliance with accessibility
standards. To support effective implementation across
all levels of the organization, Bureau Veritas will provide
two distinct reports tailored to different audiences: a
comprehensive overview in plain language for stakeholders
and leadership to understand the accessibility challenges,
and a detailed technical report with specific remediation
guidance for the IT team to execute corrections.
In addition, Bureau Veritas will conduct a sampling review
of up to 10 City documents to assess compliance with both
machine readability and visual contextual accessibility
standards. Since each report and document must undergo
compliance review before distribution, this sample analysis
will establish a baseline that enables the City to develop
standardized templates achieving 80% to 90% compliance.
This approach streamlines the City’s internal review
processes and ensures consistent accessibility across all
future communications and documentation.
FEATURE
% OF
RESPONDENTS
WHO RATED
FEATURE NO. 1
% OF
RESPONDENTS
WHO RATED
FEATURE NO. 2
% OF
RESPONDENTS
WHO RATED
FEATURE NO. 3
% OF
RESPONDENTS
WHO RATED
FEATURE NO. 4
% OF
RESPONDENTS
WHO RATED
FEATURE NO. 5
Public Restrooms 60%0%40%0%0%
Accessible Seating 20%30%20%20%0%
Accessible Routes 20%30%10%20%20%
Entrances / Doorways 0%10%20%40%30%
Parking Accommodations 0%10%10%40%40%
Note: Highest percentages are highlighted. Percentages are rounded numbers.
PUBLIC SURVEY RESULTS FOR CITY BUILDINGS
25
As an alternative service offering, should the City prefer
a comprehensive review of all its documents for WCAG
compliance, Bureau Veritas can accommodate this
expanded scope. To provide an accurate proposal for this
alternate service, the City would need to supply the total
number of pages and document types to be reviewed, as
well as specify the acceptable risk level for the engagement.
A minimal-risk approach includes both machine-based
and human verification (recommended for critical
documents), while a higher-risk option relies on machine
assessment only at a reduced cost. Please note that this
alternate service is not priced in the current proposal, as
the RFP and any addenda did not provide sufficient detail
to establish accurate pricing. Bureau Veritas would be
pleased to provide a separate quote upon receipt of these
specifications.
Facility and Parks Assessments
An experience accessibility field observer will visit each
property to observe the general condition of the site,
facility interior, facility exterior improvements, and review
available documents in order to familiarize themselves with
each site’s specific accessibility issues. BV will conduct a
walk-through visit of each facility in order to observe and
identify physical accessibility deficiencies and formulate
recommendations to eliminate the physical barriers.
As a part of the assessment process, BV will meet with a
City representative in order to gain a clear understanding
of the overall features and programs, property condition,
and completion dates of additions and/or renovations,
either on-site as part of the individual site assessment or
at the City’s offices reviewing the entire inventory. Areas
to be observed include all interior and exterior features of
the property, including parking lots, amenities, sidewalk/
pathways, recreational assets, exterior access ramps, all
interior areas accessible to the public, and employee areas.
The field observer will develop recommendations
based on the walk-through visit and interviews with
City representatives and BV’s vast experience gained on
similar properties previously evaluated. The field observer
may also question others who are knowledgeable of
the property’s physical condition and operation, or of
similar systems to gain comparative information to use in
evaluation of the property.
The field observer will review documents and information
provided by the City that could aid BV’s knowledge of the
subject property’s physical improvements, extent and type
of use, and/or assist in identifying material discrepancies
between reported information and observed conditions.
During the walk-through, the observer will utilize a field
checklist based on the 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible
Design, which are the current ADA accessibility guidelines
(ADAAG), as well as any more stringent accessibility
standards defined by the State and local accessibility codes.
The field observer will utilize a digital level, measuring
tape, door pressure gauge, light and sound meters, and
digital camera or an iPad with equivalent capability to
evaluate existing elements to determine if barriers are
present. The observer will identify and prioritize any
existing improvements not in accordance with ADA,
state, and local accessibility requirements, in the order of
preference advised by the Department of Justice in Title II
requirements, or as modified through agreement with the
City and by public survey results, such as:
•Physical access to the property
•Access to interior public areas
•Access to common areas, including recreation facilities
and other observable space
•Access to restrooms; and
•Removal of remaining barriers
The field checklists will incorporate the applicable
standards. An excerpt of the field checklist is included
below.
The BV team will assess exterior areas and interior common
areas that are defined as areas of public accommodation,
as well as the employee areas defined by the City. BV will
WHEELCHAIR STALLS YES NO N/A NOTES Regulatory
Section
Is there 48” min. from the door side of compartment to any
wall or obstruction when approach to compartment is parallel
approach to the latch side of the door? Measurement must be
made perpendicular to compartment door when fully closed
from outside of door to obstruction outside compartment.
Does door have door pulls on both sides of door near the latch?
Is centerline of water closet 17" min. to 18" maximum from side
wall?
26
identify existing non-compliant conditions, including but
not limited to, the elements specified below (if applicable):
• Space allowance/ranges
• Accessible routes, vestibules, corridors
• Protruding object
• Ground/floor surfaces
• Loading zones
• Curb ramps
• Ramps
• Stairs
• Elevators
• Platform lifts
• Windows
• Doors
• Hardware
• Work surfaces
• Entrances and exits
• Drinking fountains and water coolers
• Water closets
• Toilet stalls
• Urinals
• Lavatories and mirrors
• Bathtubs
• Shower stalls
• Toilet rooms
• Bathrooms
• Dressing/fitting rooms
• Sinks
• Storage
• Handrails, grab bars, and tub/shower seats
• Controls and operating mechanisms
• Alarms (visual, audible)
• Detectable warnings
• Signage (Braille, visual)
• Telephones
• Switches and outlets
• Seating and tables
• Assembly areas
• Parking
• Sidewalks and walkways
• Playgrounds and play areas
• Pools/aquatic facilities
• Recreational assets
If proposed solutions to the identified barriers to
accessibility would place an undue administrative or
financial burden on the City, BV will discuss these solutions
in advance with City staff. BV will provide an order of
magnitude (pre-planning level) estimate for all items of
work necessary to bring each facility into compliance. All
estimates will be based upon current year costs without
escalation. Escalation factors can be included if preferred
by the City.
PRIORITY RANKING AND CLASSIFICATION
The analysis will include all barriers to be ranked by Priority
Classes. The four classes below are DOJ recommended but
can be altered to meet your specifications and needs:
Priority 1: Accessible Approach and Entrances – An
entity providing accommodation to the public is
required to take measures to provide access to a place
of public accommodation from public sidewalks,
parking, or public transportation. These measures
include, for example, installing an entrance ramp,
correcting tripping hazards or lessening the slope of a
curb ramp. At least one route of travel to each amenity
or feature should be safe and accessible for everyone,
including people with disabilities.
Priority 2: Elements along the Accessible Route
– Barriers which occur along the path of travel
shall be removed, where such a barrier is easily
accomplishable. Examples include moving items
within reach range, widening doors, installing
accessible door hardware, and removing high-pile
carpeting.
Priority 3: Restroom Facilities – Barrier removal may
include widening of toilet stalls, installation of grab
bars. replacement of sinks and drinking fountains.
Priority 4: Access to All Other Features and Amenities
– Measures are required to provide access to other
areas. This priority is for items not required for basic
access in the other three higher priorities.
Public Rights-of-Way Evaluation
Prior to initiating the public right-of-way (PROW) portions
of the contract, BV (BV) will confirm the list of sidewalks,
streets, and curb ramps that will be analyzed. If sidewalk
locations are not known, BV will take a strategic approach
using the GIS street network to ensure a complete dataset is
collected.
BV will systematically survey the sidewalk surface
environment for compliance with state, local, and federal
accessibility standards. BV will document changes in level,
roughness, running slope, cross slope, width, and other
pathway events that may pose a barrier in the pedestrian
network. Objective sensor-based data along with
technician observed barriers will be recorded. BV will assess
curb ramps for ADA compliance, measuring necessary
attributes, including but not limited to running slope,
cross slope, landings, flares, and detectable warnings.
Image documentation of all curb ramps will be provided.
The barriers of each curb ramp or the lack of a curb ramp
will be documented. BV will capture deficiency data for
transit stops, signalized intersections, and unsignalized
intersections, including access to pedestrian pushbuttons
and the condition and presence of markings.
27
The PROW survey will begin in those priority areas that
received the highest rank and will then extend to the
other areas which are part of the rights-of-way list. This
evaluation will identify and record any gaps in connectivity,
potential safety hazards, obstructions, missing curb ramps,
and general noncompliance with accessibility regulations,
including the following:
•Assessment of the Pedestrian Right of Way (Sidewalks)
•Assessment of Curb Ramps
•Assessment of Pedestrian Crossings, Signalized
Intersections, Un-signalized Intersections
Public Rights of Way Assessment Technology
The BV team will utilize proprietary technology to efficiently
and accurately assess the conditions that exist in the
sidewalk environment within the City’s jurisdiction. An
assessment coordinator utilizes a manually-propelled
sensor-based device (or in some cases an autonomous
robotic device) to systematically evaluate the sidewalk
surface. The device automates the process of identifying
important pathway measurements for ADA compliance and
infrastructure management, including:
a)level changes (tripping hazards);
b)running slope;
c)cross slope;
d)WPRI roughness;
e)width (including pinch points);
f)images every ten feet;
g)low clearances;
h)presence of obstructions;
i)presence of vegetation;
j)presence of other manually flagged attributes; and other
qualitative attributes.
If required, one of our technology devices is uniquely
qualified to measure wheelchair pathway roughness index
(WPRI) according to ASTM E3028 (standard development
funded by the Access Board).
The technology utilizes lasers, inertial measurement
sensors, and HD cameras to facilitate data collection
of all necessary measurements. It supports sidewalk,
crosswalk, and public right-of-way data collection up to
five times faster than standard methods (tape measures
and levels), while providing the best data. Unlike other tools
and software, our technology delivers continuous data
rather than individual points of only tripping hazards and
obstructions on a map. This means that the City receives
the most complete dataset without missing any part of the
pedestrian network.
BV gathers all of the typical curb ramp, pedestrian signal,
and bus stop measurements for ADA compliance, including
but not limited to:
a)running and cross slopes;
b)lengths and widths;
c)detectable warning surfaces;
d)landing measurements;
e)presence of obstructions;
f)photos; and other configurable measurements and
qualitative attributes.
Federal, state, or local curb ramp types are utilized as
a guide to facilitate data collection of all necessary
measurements. Our technology supports data collection
up to six times faster than standard methods, providing
the best data. Unlike Lidar collection methods, which can
have difficulty measuring slopes the technology provides
accurate slope and distance measurements comparable
to the standard tape measure and digital level. Its unique
rating index, which is customizable, makes it easy to
prioritize improvements, delivering data-driven results, and
saving time and money.
28
PROW Deliverable
All data is delivered in a GIS-compatible format (.gdb or
.shp), making it easy to integrate into the City’s GIS software
enabling easy data-driven decision-making. Data may be
exported in a Microsoft Excel format with GPS coordinates
for easy spreadsheet analysis. Sidewalk data is delivered as
connected ten foot segments to match with the collected
images and on a block-face system. An accessibility score
and pavement score is given to each 10-foot segment and
each block-face, which allows for prioritization at both
the micro (segment) and macro (block) levels. Curb ramp,
transit stop, and pedestrian signal information is delivered
as individual GIS point layers containing all associated
data and condition scores. The scoring methodology is
configurable based on the weighted value assigned to
each attribute.
ADA Training
Bureau Veritas has extensive experience providing
comprehensive training on ADA laws, regulations, and
compliance best practices. Our team of ADA experts has
worked with numerous municipalities across the country
to educate staff on the requirements of the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA) and how to effectively implement and
maintain ADA self-evaluation and transition plans.
We will work closely with the City to tailor the
training curriculum to address the specific needs and
responsibilities of designated staff. This will include in-
depth instruction on applicable ADA laws and regulations,
as well as hands-on guidance for using and maintaining
the City’s self-evaluation, transition plan, and associated
project database and mapping tools. Our training will
ensure that City staff are fully equipped to comply with all
ADA requirements within the built enviroment and sustain
ongoing accessibility efforts. We have a proven track
record of delivering high-quality, interactive training that
empowers public sector clients to proactively address ADA
compliance.
Transition Plan
The field assessment data and costs, programs assessment,
and the public rights-of-way data and costs will be brought
together in one document to form the Transition Plan. Once
the assessments of the programs, buildings, facilities, and
parks are complete, data will be analyzed and prioritized.
The Transition Plan document will include all identified
barriers to accessibility, associated costs for barrier
removal, and tentative solutions.
Solutions will be discussed with City staff and presented to
stakeholders, as needed. Once all facility assessments have
been completed, a Draft Transition Plan will be prepared.
The Transition Plan will provide a framework for full
compliance with the accessibility regulations.
The Transition Plan process comprises the following
components:
•Identification of physical and programmatic barriers in
facilities under the City’s jurisdiction.
•Determination of the barrier removal remedy and an
order of magnitude estimate of the cost of the barrier
removal required to eliminate the physical barrier or
discriminatory practice.
•Assignment of priority level to the barrier removal.
•Formulation of the Transition Plan within the
parameters of projected fiscal year budget constraints.
Within the Transition Plan, BV notes work that shall remove
physical and programmatic barriers in existing facilities, and
communication barriers structural in nature, where such
removal is able to be carried out without much difficulty
or expense. This document will outline in detail the steps
required for the City to achieve accessibility compliance.
Where the Transition Plan identifies work which will take
longer than one year to complete, a multi-year schedule
with priorities will be provided.
Results of the initial public outreach and the advice of the
City’s ADA Compliance Team will be incorporated into the
Transition Plan. The Transition Plan can establish phases
of barrier removal, without a calendar timeframe. To the
extent that a facility, program, service, or activity is not
going to be fully accessible to and usable by people with
disabilities in the immediate future, we will work with
the ADA Compliance Team to determine the best interim
procedure or policy in order to enhance accessibility to
the maximum extent possible. BV will meet with the ADA
Compliance Team to present a Draft Transition Plan and
gain its input and commentary on the Draft Transition Plan
prior to presentation to the community.
The ADA requires that a public entity solicit and allow for
the participation of interested persons in the development
of a Transition Plan. The public outreach effort for the
Draft Transition Plan will include advertisements in local
newspapers in the weeks leading up to a public meeting
for presentation of the draft Transition Plan. It will be
the responsibility of the City to post notice of the public
meeting on the City’s website. Following the public
meeting, BV will meet with the ADA Compliance Team to
review all applicable commentary and to make choices
regarding the draft final plan to be presented to the City.
Regular maintenance or rehabilitation projects and that
accessibility projects are blended into other scheduled
work, when possible.
29
Following the review and inclusion of public comments in
the Transition Plan, BV will submit the Final Transition Plan
in printed and electronic copies to the designated parties
and stakeholders. The Final Transition Plan will include
an executive summary, and a description of how the
entire self-evaluation and transition planning process was
conducted. BV will present the Final Transition Plan to the
City at a scheduled meeting. Along with the Transition Plan
and a summary, BV will prepare a PowerPoint presentation
that will explain how the Transition Plan was formed, the
choices which were made with respect to accessibility
solutions, the manner in which budget decisions were
made, and the benefits that the implementation of the
Transition Plan will bring to the City.
ADA Cost Estimates
The ADA AssetCALC™ cost estimating database is based
on industry cost benchmarks and further customized with
proprietary cost tables developed by BV, based on historical
and localized actual costs. BV maintains and updates the
cost estimating system with information received from the
field. Through ADA project management and construction
monitoring work, BV has current cost data from hundreds
of in-progress construction and rehabilitation projects. This
data allows BV to calculate costs based on local conditions
to maintain a cost database that is up-to-date.
Typically, barrier removal planning level cost estimates
are based upon the removal of the specific element, for
example, a parking stall or curb ramp. In some site-specific
instances, barrier removal may affect an area beyond
the specific location of the barrier. Grading plans based
on field surveys using land surveyor instrumentation, or
architectural plans requiring wall relocation could result in
significantly different material quantities and subsequent
higher project costs. The database contains standardized
order of magnitude cost estimates for barrier removal
for use in prioritizing the work in the Transition Plan. At
the implementation stage, it is anticipated a detailed
specification will be prepared and bids will be generated
to establish planning level costs. ADA AssetCALC™ cost
estimates are pre-planning level, order of magnitude
barrier removal cost estimates. Cost tables, similar to the
ones detailed in the table below, will be provided for each
facility/site.
Deliverables
The deliverables are:
• Facility and Park ADA Assessments - individual facility
and Park reports
• Public Rights-of-way Assessments - individual rights-of-
way reports
• Program Access and Policy Review - Optional
• Public Outreach Meetings (2) and Public Survey
• Transition Plan
The facility assessment and program assessment reports
are provided in electronic format and are typically
represented in three formats:
• Word® document converted to an Adobe PDF, with
photographic images of barriers and GPS positioning of
exterior barriers.
• Excel® spreadsheet with code references, existing
conditions, barrier resolution, and cost data.
• Cloud-based database ADA AssetCALC™.
BV will provide an ADA report for each facility assessment
with a description of each barrier observed and recorded,
and will define the location, recorded measurements,
barrier description, applicable ADAAG/state/local code
reference, viable corrective action, priority, and order of
magnitude (pre-planning level) cost estimate of repair.
Color photographs of each barrier are included with the
barrier record. Barriers will be identified and presented
by individual facility. Each report will include an executive
summary, including a summary cost table identifying the
estimated cost to correct each facility.
The Public Rights-of-Way (PROW) reports will be provided
with all of the collected and derived data in a spreadsheet
format compatible with Microsoft Excel and as a file
geodatabase that is compatible with GIS products. The
PROW data is separated into two primary data sets; the
Segment Data that contains surface information, and the
Feature Data.
Line data and point data can be spatially displayed via the
GPS information recorded for the stations and features they
contain. Segment Summary data is a table of information
about each segment that is derived from the collected data.
Feature data is separated into three different tables. The
first is the spatial feature summary that contains the spatial
location and type information for each feature collected.
The second feature is a table created for each individual
feature type collected contain the specific attribute data for
that feature type.
The third table is the compliance table that derives
the compliance of each feature based on a series of
queries comparing the collected data and the minimum
requirements of the Draft Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities
in the Public Right-of-Way (PROWAG). Both the feature data
and compliance data can be joined or related to the spatial
feature summary table via a unique ID that the PROW
software generates.
30
BV will use our web-based database, ADA AssetCALC™
for the facility assessments, and for components of the
Transition Plan. ADA AssetCALC™ will provide the City with
the ability to generate cost tables for all facilities, or for
each individual facility. Similar types of barriers can be
queried within the ADA AssetCALC™ database across all
facilities, with the resulting ability to improve purchasing
and contracting power. Barriers can be ranked by priority
for removal. Photos will be uploaded to ADA AssetCALC™
to be viewed as a photo log or individually, when reviewing
a specific barrier. BV will provide a Transition Plan, which
will include the program access report, presented in a
Word document converted to an Adobe PDF, with the data
exportable to an Excel format. BV will provide an electronic
draft of the reports for review, including text, tables, digital
photos, field notes, and supporting documentation. Final
reports will be provided after all the City’s comments have
been addressed.
Data Management Solution - ADA
AssetCALC™ Software
BV is providing access, at no additional charge, to ADA
AssetCALC™ for a period of three (3) years. This platform
streamlines the Capital Planning and ADA Transition
Planning process by compiling funding requirements for
barriers and creating budget models based on project
priority, life cycle maintenance, and repair requirements.
The City is not required to utilize this software as we will
provide hardcopy reports and we can export the data to
Excel and Word formats.
ADA AssetCALC™ is a web-based SQL database platform
that enables users to query, edit, and analyze their facility
accessibility and condition data to plan immediate and
short-term barrier repairs, and budget capital expenditures
throughout the lifecycle of a single building or an entire
portfolio. The system unites BV’s experienced field data
collection methods with advanced planning and reporting
tools, construction cost library, location mapping features,
digital photo management, and document storage.
ADA AssetCALC™ will provide the City with the ability
to list, prioritize, query, and track deficiencies recorded
through the Self-Assessment Process. It is easy to use, and
populated with accessibility requirements pertinent to the
City. BV recognizes that budgets change and the Transition
Plan must be able to account for unplanned occurrences.
ADA AssetCALC™ provides a process to complete work on
those barriers that have been corrected over time. Reports
can be queried instantaneously to reflect the barriers
corrected. ADA AssetCALC™ provides the ability to track
progress over time. Prior to populating the database, BV
will work with the City to establish required attributes and
data points associated with each asset. This will include
a discussion of the relative priority of the asset requiring
barrier removal. This will include all of the City’s physical
assets and will be grouped in a hierarchy based on site
location, asset group, and function.
BV will utilize ADA AssetCALC™ to track physical
accessibility needs associated with the Implementation/
Transition Plan. The database contains a capital planning
and transition planning module in which accessibility
construction projects may be established, including
barrier removal priorities. It will provide the City with a
consolidated database of capital projects related to barrier
removal. Capabilities of ADA AssetCALC™ include, but are
not limited to:
•Microsoft.net web-enabled software
•Customizable fields, groupings, and reporting
•Reports, charts and graphs to forecast capital needs for
individual buildings and construction projects
•Progress reports and tracking of the corrective measure
progress
•Capital budget planning tools to assign and track
progress over fiscal years
•Corrective action work completed/progress complete
•Access to the observed site conditions of barriers with
photographs and GPS positions of exterior barriers
•Updateable cost library makes budgets more accurate
over time
•Customizable priority framework and search tools to
help decision makers
•Export tools to take data to other applications, including
Microsoft Excel
•Repository for storing and searching documents related
to buildings and component
•ADA compliance library to plan and track accessibility
improvements
•Administrative tools for managing user access
ADA AssetCALC™‘ reporting can include GPS coordinates for
locations of each exterior barrier on a satellite map. BV, in
conjunction with Google Earth imaging, provides the most
recent satellite mapping. Each exterior barrier is indicated
by its own GPS marker.
Additional screenshots and a live demonstration are
available upon request.
31
Observation Input / Barrier Detail Screen
32
Interactive GPS map with numbered icons
Work Completed/Verified Report
33
BV has the ability and resources to complete the ADA assessments in a timely manner. The following details our proposed timeline to complete the project. This
schedule is open to negotiations between the City and BV.
Proposed Schedule
ID Task Name Start Finish
1 Finalize Contract and Notice to Proceed Mon 7/6/26 Mon 7/6/26
2 Program Planning / Scheduling Mon 7/6/26 Thu 7/9/26
3 Kickoff Meeting with La Quinta Staff Mon 7/13/26 Mon 7/13/26
4 Progress Meetings / Updates Mon 7/20/26 Mon 9/28/26
11 Self Evaluation Assessments - Facilities / Parks / PROW Mon 7/13/26 Wed 9/16/26
12 Team 1 - Facilities / Parks Assessments Mon 7/13/26 Fri 8/7/26
13 Team 1 - PROW Surveys (121 Miles)Mon 7/13/26 Mon 8/17/26
14 Team 2 - PROW Surveys (121 Miles)Mon 8/10/26 Wed 9/16/26
15 Self Evaluation Reports - Facilities / Parks / PROW Mon 8/10/26 Wed 10/14/26
16 Draft Reports and Costs to La Quinta Staff (Rolling Delivery)Mon 8/10/26 Wed 9/16/26
17 Prioritization and Costing, GIS Thu 9/10/26 Wed 9/16/26
18 City Staff Review of Facility Data and Costs Thu 9/17/26 Wed 10/14/26
19 City Staff Review of PROW Data and Costs Thu 8/20/26 Wed 10/14/26
20 Programs / Policy Review - Stakeholder Outreach Tue 7/28/26 Thu 10/8/26
21 Surveys to Departments Tue 7/28/26 Mon 8/10/26
22 Policy / Program Review / Staff Training Tue 8/11/26 Mon 9/7/26
23 Review Staff Surveys Tue 9/8/26 Thu 9/10/26
24 Staff Webinar and Training on ADA Program Findings Thu 9/10/26 Thu 9/10/26
25 Prepare Report on Program / Policy Review Fri 9/11/26 Thu 9/24/26
26 City Staff Review of Programs Report Fri 9/25/26 Thu 10/8/26
27 Transition Plans (Facilities & PROW)Wed 10/14/26 Wed 12/16/26
28 Priority Development Meeting Wed 10/14/26 Wed 10/14/26
29 First Draft - Transition Plan Submission Thu 10/15/26 Wed 10/28/26
30 La Quinta Staff Review of First Draft - Transition Plan Thu 10/29/26 Wed 11/11/26
31 Public Outreach - Draft Transition Plan Wed 11/11/26 Wed 11/11/26
32 Second Draft - Final Transition Plan Submission Thu 11/12/26 Wed 11/25/26
33 La Quinta Staff Review of Second Draft - Transition Plan Thu 11/26/26 Wed 12/9/26
34 Final Transition Plan Revisions Thu 12/10/26 Wed 12/16/26
35 Final Transition Plan Presentation to La Quinta Council Wed 12/16/26 Wed 12/16/26
36 ADA AssetCALC Software Training Wed 12/16/26 Wed 12/16/26
7/6
7/13
9/10
10/14
11/11
12/16
12/16
Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Qtr 3, 2026 Qtr 4, 2026 Q
Task
Split
Milestone
Summary
Project Summary
External Tasks
External MileTask
Inactive Task
Inactive Milestone
Inactive Summary
Manual Task
Duration-only
Manual Summary Rollup
Manual Summary
Start-only
Finish-only
Progress
Split
Page 1
Project: City of La Quinta Date: Wed 6/10/26
34
ATTACHMENTS
Page 10 of 12
ATTACHMENT 2
INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Must be executed by proposer and submitted with the proposal
I, ________________________________________ (name) hereby acknowledge and confirm that
__________________________________ (name of company) has reviewed
the City’s indemnification and minimum insurance requirements as listed in Exhibits E and
F of the City’s Agreement for Contract Services (Attachment 1); and declare that insurance
certificates and endorsements verifying compliance will be provided if an agreement is awarded.
I am _________________________________ of ______________________________,
(Title) (Company)
Commercial General Liability (at least as broad as ISO CG 0001):
$1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate OR
$2,000,000 per occurrence/$4,000,000 aggregate
$5,000,000 per occurrence/$5,000,000 aggregate
Must include the following endorsements:
General Liability Additional Insured
General Liability Primary and Non-contributory
Commercial Automobile Liability (at least as broad as ISO CA 0001):
$1,000,000 combined single limit for bodily injury and property damage
Auto Liability Additional Insured
Workers’ Compensation (per statutory requirements):
Statutory Limits / Employer’s Liability $1,000,000 per accident or disease
Must include the following endorsements:
Workers’ Compensation Endorsement with Waiver of Subrogation; OR
Workers’ Compensation Declaration of Sole Proprietor (if applicable)
Professional Liability (Errors and Omissions):
Errors and Omissions liability insurance with a limit of not less than $1,000,000 per claim
Cyber Liability
$1,000,000 per occurrence/$2,000,000 aggregate
Erik Piller
Bureau Veritas Technical
Assessments LLC
Executive Vice President Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments
10. Insurance Requirements
35
Page 11 of 12
ATTACHMENT 3
NON-COLLUSION AFFIDAVIT FORM
Must be executed by proposer and submitted with the proposal
I, ________________________________________ (name) hereby declare as follows:
I am _________________________________ of ______________________________,
(Title) (Company)
the party making the foregoing proposal, that the proposal is not made in the interest of, or on behalf
of, any undisclosed person, partnership, company, association, organization, or corporation; that the
proposal is genuine and not collusive or sham; that the proposer has not directly or indirectly induced
or solicited any other proposer to put in a false or sham proposal, and has not directly or indirectly
colluded, conspired, connived, or agreed with any proposer or anyone else to put in a sham proposal,
or that anyone shall refrain from proposing; that the proposer has not in any manner, directly or
indirectly, sought by agreement, communication, or conference with anyone to fix the proposal price of
the proposer or any other proposer, or to fix any overhead, profit, or cost element of the proposal price,
or of that of any other proposer, or to secure any advantage against the public body awarding the
agreement of anyone interested in the proposed agreement; that all statements contained in the
proposal are true; and, further, that the proposer has not, directly or indirectly, submitted his or her
proposal price or any breakdown thereof, or the contents thereof, or divulged information or data relative
hereto, or paid, and will not pay, any fee to any corporation, partnership, company, association,
organization, proposal depository, or to any member or agent thereof to effectuate a collusive or sham
proposal.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and
correct.
Proposer Signature: __________________________________________________
Proposer Name: __________________________________________________
Proposer Title: __________________________________________________
Company Name: __________________________________________________
Address: __________________________________________________
Erik Piller
Executive Vice President Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC
Erik Piller
Executive Vice President
Bureau Veritas Technical Assessments LLC
180 Promenade Circle, Suite 150 | Sacramento, CA 95834
11. Non-Collusion Affidavit Form
36
Page 12 of 12
ATTACHMENT 4
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT OF ADDENDA
Must be executed by proposer and submitted with the proposal;
If no addenda has been issued, mark “N/A” under Addendum No. indicating
Not Applicable and sign
ADDENDUM NO. SIGNATURE INDICATING RECEIPT
1
2
12. Acknowledgement of Receipt of Addenda