HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026-04-22 Thelma Levy - Public Comment_RedactedApril 22, 2026
FORMAL OBJECTION
Case No.: CUP 2025-004
City of La Quinta
City Council and Planning Department
La Quinta, California
Re: Objection to Proposed Water Park Development Adjacent to
Dear Council Members:
I have recently been made aware thatthe La Quints Resort has ro osed a water ark
development planned directly adjacent to my property at in La Quints.
As a Tennis Villa property owner, I am concerned aboutthe negative impacts this projectwoutd
have, not only on my personal property, but also on the surrounding community. This letter serves
as my formal objection to the project.
I purchased and extensively renovated this propertyjust a few years ago because of its beautiful
View and its proximity to the uniquely historical La Quints Resort. I appreciated that the resort had
retained its original character and architecturally significant historic buildings, such as the Morgan
House, throughout it's various expansion and improvement projects. The current proposal does
not adhere to those principles and is deeply incongruous with the rest of the resort. Furthermore,
I believe that the proposed construction in this locale would undermine the historical value of the
resort property that has long been a hallmark of the area.
Because of its direct proximityto my property, the proposed structure would block existingviews
and natural light from my downstairs bedroom patios on the ground level, and from my second -
story main living area and balcony. No longer would we be able to enjoy the beautiful panoramic
view of the pool area, greater La Quints Resort and the Santa Rosa Mountains. Rather, we would
be Looking at a 30-34 foot wall/structure and pool equipment enclosure, which would
significantly reduce the aesthetic appeal of my home. Not to mention the noise created from the
enthusiastic screams of the slide participants and the constant din of the filtration system. Apart
from our personal enjoyment, I believe the project would negatively impact the income potential
of the property, which we currently offer forshort-term rentals and one of the reasons we
purchased. These factors would combine to have a significant and detrimental affect on my
property value, currently perceived as a beautifully remodeled unit with wonderful resort /
mountain views to "the unit next to the water slide" i
While I appreciate the resort's desire to improve the main pool area, and understand the City's
interest in supporting community amenities, I urge the City to reconsider the scale and location of
this project, as its implications extend beyond individualproperty concerns, affecting the
character and integrity of our cherished community.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. I hope my concerns will be taken into serious
consideration as discussions on the water park expansion proceed. I am not opposed to
thoughtful development; however, I am opposed to a configuration that places a high -activity
commercial use immediately adjacent to my home. We are still suffering shock from the
adjacent Palm Grove being turned into into a loud event space— how much more are we expected
to endure.
Sincerely,
Thelma Levy Quints, CA 92253
Attachments:
CEQA Objection Supporting Statement
Historical Character Impact Statement
CEQA OBJECTION SUPPORTING STATEMENT
Project: La Quints Resort Family Pool Expansion
Case No.: CUP 2025-0004
Property: La Quints, CA
This document is submitted in support of a formal objection to the above -referenced
project and outlines specific environmentaland property -related concerns pursuant -to the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
1. Visual Impact The proposed development includes structures reaching approximately 30
feet in height directly adjacent to the property. This would significantly obstruct existing
views from both the main -level patio and second -story living areas, materially alteringthe
character of the property.
2. Light Obstruction The projectwould block southern light exposure into the residence.
Natural light is a critical component of habitabilityand propertyvalue and should be
considered in environmental review.
3. Noise and Event Activity Existing conditions already include occasional amplified music
from nearby resort activities. Expansion into a high -activity poolvenue is likelyto increase
frequencyand intensity of noise, including potential DJ events and gatherings, creating a
substantial and ongoing disturbance.
4. Privacy Concerns Elevated structures and increased guest activity in close proximitywill
result in direct visibility into private residential spaces, including patio and second -story
windows.
5. Economic Impact The subject property operates as a short-term rental, generating
approximately $50,000 annually. The proposed project may negatively impact occupancy
rates, guest satisfaction, and overall income potential due to noise, privacy, and visual
concerns.
6. Cumulative Impact When considered together, the impacts of height, noise, light
obstruction, and privacy loss represent a significant cumulative burden on the propertyand
warrant full environmental review ratherthan categorical exemption.
7. Alternative Location Recommendation Relocatingthe project closerto the street -facing
portion of the site would significantly reduce the direct impact on adjacent residential
properties and should be evaluated as a feasible alternative.
Page 1 of 2
Conclusion
Given the above factors, the project presents potential significant environmental impacts
that require thorough CEQA review. Approval without appropriate analysis and mitigation
would result in disproportionate harm to adjacent property owners.
Submitted by: Thelma Levy La Quints, CA 92353
Page 2 of 2
HISTORIC CHARACTER IMPACT STATEMENT
Project: La Quinta Resort Family Pool Expansion
Case No.: CUP 2025-0004
Purpose
This statement outlines concerns regarding the impact of the proposed project on the historic
character, scale, and identity of the La Quinta Resort and its surrounding residential community.
1. Historic Character of La Quinta Resort
La Quinta Resort is widely recognized as a historic, low -scale, Spanish -style resort environment
characterized by: - Modest building heights - Quiet, garden -oriented spaces - Integration with
surrounding residential uses - A relaxed, low -intensity atmosphere
This character is a defining feature of the property and contributes to both its value and
community compatibility.
2. Incompatibility of Waterpark-Style Development
The introduction of a waterpark-style pool complex represents a fundamental shift in: - Use
intensity (higher occupancy, activity levels) - Noise profile (amplified sound, group activity) -
Visual character (large-scale, vertical features)
This type of development is inconsistent with the established resort identity and introduces a
theme -park -style use into a historically quiet setting.
3. Structural Impact— 30-Foot Tower
The proposed approximately 30-foot tower structure to be built over the existing pickleball courts
further intensifies this incompatibility by: - Introducing vertical massing inconsistent with
surrounding structures - Blocking existing sightlines from nearby residences - Reducing natural
Light to adjacent properties
"Creating a visually dominant feature in a traditionally low -scale environment"
4. Zoning and Resort Character Standards
The project, as proposed, appears to be: - Inconsistent with zoning intent, particularly where
compatibility with adjacent residential uses is required - Misaligned with resort character
standards, which emphasize scale, aesthetics, and harmony with surroundings
Page 1 of 2
5. Cumulative Effect
When combined with the already operational Grove venue, the project contributes to a
progressive shift away from historic resort character toward higher -intensity commercial use,
which warrants careful review.
Conclusion
The proposed project is not simply an incremental improvement, it represents a material change
in character, scale, and use that is inconsistent with the historic identity of La Quinta Resort and
its surrounding residential environment. These impacts should be fully evaluated prior to any
approval.
Page 2 of 2