HomeMy WebLinkAbout2011-05 DPLM CMI RFP - NN TYLIN Proposal Evaluation Form
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS EVALUATION
Project Name: Dune Palms Bridge Project Construction Management
and Inspection Services, Federal Project No.: BRKLS33(014), City Project No.: 2011-05
Consultant:_____________________________________________
Reviewer: ____________________________
Date:_______________
Refer to Scoring Breakdown on next sheet.
Project Understanding and Approach 30
Experience with similar kinds of work 25
Quality of staff for work to be done 20
Familiarity with State and Federal procedures 15
Format/Organization (Intent of RFP) 10
Total 100
Unique Qualities (Intangibles):
(Explanation)_____________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________
Comments:______________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________
TOTAL ______
Reviewer’s Signature _______________________________________________
Contract Administrator's Initials ____________ Date ________________
Scoring Breakdown:
Project understanding and approach - 30 points maximum
0-15: Scope of work is off topic or is missing more than 5 key elements.
16-25: Scope of work is understandable but missing a few key elements.
26-30: Scope of work well justified and most or all key elements are included.
Experience with similar kinds of work - 25 points maximum
0-10 points: Consultant does not include previous experience or has very minimal
experience.
16-20 points: Consultant lists previous experience, but experience is not relevant
or similar.
21-25 points: Consultant lists relevant previous experience with similar work.
Quality of staff for work to be done - 20 points maximum
0-8 points: Resumes not included or staff has little to no experience with similar
project.
9-15 points: Staff list includes resumes, but experience is not relevant or similar.
16-20 points: Staff has relevant experience and is competent to perform scope
requested.
Familiarity with State and Federal Procedures - 15 Points Maximum
0-4 points: Zero to little previous Federal and State project experience
5-10 points: Federal and State experience but not on similar work.
11-15 points: Relevant Federal and State Experience.
Format/Organization - 10 points maximum
0-4: Scope of work is not or barely organized into tasks and subtasks, does not
flow clearly.
5-7: Scope of work is organized into tasks and subtasks, but not in a clear logical
order.
8-10: Scope of work is well organized into logical tasks and subtasks to complete
a project.