HomeMy WebLinkAboutMemo Final
June 5, 2019
CITY OF LA QUINTA
78-495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
Subject: Whitewater River Multi-Use Pathway Alignment at the Indian Wells – La
Quinta Border
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC. (RK) has conducted a qualitative review of two alignments
for the proposed multi-use pathway to be constructed along the south side of the
Whitewater River. These are in consideration of how bicyclists and pedestrians will be likely
to move from Indian Wells and enter and exit the future pathway using two possible access
points.
Alignment A would begin/end at Washington Street. It is likely that a number of pathway
users will wish to access the pathway coming from Highway 111 or travel from the
pathway to Highway 111. To do so they will likely cross Highway 111 and Washington
Street using the existing crosswalks at the intersection and use the existing sidewalk on the
east side of Washington Street.
Alignment B would begin/end at the west end of the Point Happy retail center. It is likely
that a number of pathway users will wish to access the pathway coming from Highway
111 or travel from the pathway to Highway 111. To do so they will likely use the access
road to the east of Point Happy and cross Highway 111 using the existing crosswalk at
Plaza La Quinta/Hwy 111.
Exhibit A shows the two alignment options.
RK has conducted a qualitative review of the two alignments from a traffic and circulation
standpoint. Based on the qualitative review, from a traffic and circulation standpoint,
Alignment A would present the following challenges:
a. Alignment A would require pathway users to exit Whitewater River at Washington
Street and travel on the east edge of Washington Street, crossing two driveways
associated with the existing commercial land uses located on the east side of
CITY OF LA QUINTA
RK 15348 / JN 2844-2019-01
Page 2
Washington Street. This could result in potential traffic conflicts between pathway
users and vehicles entering and exiting the commercial site driveways.
b. The intersection of Washington Street / Highway 111 is a major intersection of six
lane major roadways. The intersection currently has double and triple left-turn lanes
and double and in some cases channelized right-turn lanes at some of the
approaches of the intersection. Alignment A would require pathway users to cross
both the east leg and the south leg of the intersection, thereby potentially creating
more opportunities for traffic and circulation conflicts .
First, pathway users will need to cross the east leg of the intersection which has a
curb to curb distance of approximately 136 feet. Based on the standard pedestrian
crossing speed of 3.5 feet per second, it would take approximately 39 seconds to
cross the east leg of this very busy intersection.
c. After crossing the east leg of the intersection, pathway users will then need to cross
the south leg of the intersection before they can travel westbound on the south side
of Highway 111 and continue on the pathway. The south leg of the intersection
has a curb to curb distance of approximately 125 feet. Based on the standard
pedestrian crossing speed of 3.5 feet per second, it would take approximately 36
seconds to cross the south leg of this very busy intersection.
d. It should be noted the south leg of the intersection (northbound Washington Street
approach) has a channelized right-turn and raised concrete island. Hence, when the
pathway users cross the east leg of the intersection, they would be required to wait
in the middle of the intersection at the raised concrete island before they can cross
the south leg of the intersection.
e. As previously noted, based on the standard pedestrian crossing speed of 3.5 feet
per second, it would take approximately 39 seconds to cross the east leg of the
intersection and approximately 36 seconds to cross the south leg. Every time a
pedestrian call is placed to cross the east or south leg of the Washington Street /
Highway 111 intersection, the cycle length of the intersection needs to be extended
long enough to allow for the pedestrian crossing. Having the pathway users cross
this intersection would increase the number of pedestrian calls at this intersection
CITY OF LA QUINTA
RK 15348 / JN 2844-2019-01
Page 3
and could adversely impact the level of service and vehicular flow at one of the
busiest intersections in the area.
f. After performing two crossings to navigate the Washington Street / Highway 111
intersections, pathway users will need to travel along the south edge of Highway
111 towards west. This would require crossing of two existing commercial
driveways serving the commercial land uses on the south side of Highway 111 east
of the Whitewater River.
Users traveling in the reverse direction of this pathway would also experience the
circulation issues and conflicts listed above as they travel in the opposite direction.
The above listed items are summarized graphically in Exhibit B.
In comparison to Alignment A, Alignment Alternate B has the following circulation
characteristics:
a. Alignment B would allow pathway users to exit the Whitewater River on the
west side of the Point Happy retail center. This alignment would not require the
pathway users to cross commercial driveways as they approach Highway 111,
resulting in much reduced traffic conflicts. Once the pathway users approach
Highway 111, they will be able to reach the south edge of Highway 111 by
performing a single crossing on the east leg of the intersection.
b. Under this alignment, instead of performing two long crossings at a very major
intersection, pathway users would need to perform one single crossing at a
much smaller intersection with a curb to curb distance of approximately 80 feet
on the west leg. Based on the standard pedestrian crossing speed of 3.5 feet
per second, it would take approximately 23 seconds to cross this leg. This is a
significant improvements when compared to Alignment A which requires two
crossings with a total time of approximately 75 seconds plus additional waiting
required in a raised channelized median in the middle of a major intersection.
c. Additionally, combined with the shorter crossing time, since the intersection is
not as significant as the Washington Street / Highway 111 intersection, the
extension of the timing that would be required to accommodate the crossings is
CITY OF LA QUINTA
RK 15348 / JN 2844-2019-01
Page 4
expected to result in much less impacts on the vehicular traffic flow in the
circulation system.
Users traveling in the reverse direction of this pathway would also experience the
circulation benefits and improvements listed above as they travel in the opposite direction.
The above listed items are summarized graphically in Exhibit C.
Based on the above evaluation and considerations, RK would consider Alignment B to be
the superior alignment from a traffic and circulation standpoint.
If you have any questions regarding this letter report, please call us at (949) 474-0809.
Respectfully submitted,
RK ENGINEERING GROUP, INC.
Alex Tabrizi, PE, TE
Associate Principal
Attachments
Attachments