Loading...
2016 05 24 PCV90LI 09, M#= Planning Commission agendas and staff reports are now available on the City's web page: www.la-quint" PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta REGULAR MEETING on TUESDAY, MAY 24, 2016 at 6:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER 1. Roll Call 2. Pledge of Allegiance PUBLIC COMMENT At this time members of the public may address the Planning Commission on any matter not listed on the agenda. Please complete a "Request to Speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the minutes of May 10, 2016. PUBLIC HEARINGS For all Public Hearings on the agenda, a completed "Request to Speak" form must be filed with the Executive Assistant prior to consideration of that item. A person may submit written comments to the Planning Commission before a public hearing or appear in support or opposition to the approval of a project(s). If you challenge a project(s) in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City at, or prior to the public hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 1 MAY 24, 2016 Beginning Resolution No. 2016-008 1. Tentative Tract Map 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) submitted by Essi Shahandeh proposing to subdivide approximately 4.6 acre site into ten residential lots. CEQA: Exempt from Environmental Review pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act in that the proposed project can be characterized as in -fill development. Location: Monroe Street, between Avenue 54 and Airport Boulevard. 2. Conditional Use Permit 2015-0003 submitted by Verizon Wireless proposing the placement of a 60-foot tall monopalm wireless telecommunication tower and mechanical equipment at Fritz Burns Park. CEQA: Exempt from Environmental Review pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act in that the proposed project can be characterized as in -fill development and Section 15303 (CLASS 3) for new construction or conversion of small structures. Location: 78-060 Francis Hack Lane. BUSINESS SESSION - NONE COMMISSIONER ITEMS - NONE STAFF ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The next regular meeting of the Planning Commission will be held on June 14, 2016, commencing at 6:00 p.m. at the City Hall Council Chambers, 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, CA 92253. DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Wanda Wise -Latta, Executive Assistant of the City of La Quinta, do hereby declare that the foregoing Agenda for the La Quinta Planning Commission meeting was posted on the inside of the north entry to the La Quinta Civic Center at 78-495 Calle Tampico, and the bulletin boards at 78-630 Highway 111, and the La Quinta Cove Post Office at 51-321 Avenida Bermudas, on May 20, 2016. DATED: May 19, 2016 WANDA WISE-LATTA, Executive Assistant City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 2 MAY 24, 2016 PUBLIC NOTICES The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's office at 777-7123, twenty-four (24) hours in advance of the meeting and accommodations will be made. If special electronic equipment is needed to make presentations to the Commission, arrangements should be made in advance by contacting the City Clerk's office at 777-7123. A one (1) week notice is required. If background material is to be presented to the Commission during a Planning Commission meeting, please be advised that eight (8) copies of all documents, exhibits, etc., must be supplied to the Executive Assistant for distribution. It is requested that this take place prior to the beginning of the meeting. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Commission regarding any item(s) on this agenda will be made available for public inspection at the Design and Development Department's counter at City Hall located at 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California, 92253, during normal business hours. PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA 3 MAY 24, 2016 PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 10, 2016 CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the La Quinta Planning Commission was called to order at 6:00 p.m. by Chairperson Wilkinson. PRESENT: Commissioners Bettencourt, Blum, Fitzpatrick, Wright and Chairperson Wilkinson STAFF PRESENT: Planning Manager Gabriel Perez, Principal Engineer Bryan McKinney, Consultant Principal Planner Nicole Criste, Executive Assistant Wanda Wise -Latta, Deputy City Clerk Monika Radeva, and Management Assistant Carla Triplett Commissioner Blum led the Commission in the Pledge of Allegiance. PUBLIC COMMENT - None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA - Confirmed APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. Approval of the minutes of April 26, 2016. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Wright/Blum to approve the Planning Commission Minutes of April 26, 2016 as submitted. Motion passed unanimously. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Environmental Assessment 2015-0002, Zone Change 2015-0001, Specific Plan 2015-0002, Site Development Permit 2015-0002 and Tentative Tract Map 2015- 0003 (TTM 36875) submitted by Desert Land Holdings LLC proposing to construct 15 single-family homes on 3.22 acres. Project: Villas at Indian Springs. CEQA: consideration of a Mitigated Negative Declaration of environmental impact. Location: southeast corner of Jefferson Street and Palm Circle Drive. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1 MAY 10, 2016 Consultant Principal Planner Nicole Criste presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Design and Development Department. A memorandum dated May 10, 2016, containing comments in opposition of Public Hearing Item No. 1 from Mr. Karl R. Holt received on May 9, 2016, was distributed to the Commission prior to the meeting and made available to the public. Staff addressed the Commission's questions with regards to lot dimensions, parking, wall specifications, drainage, sewer easement, landscape palette, and fire sprinklers. Chairperson Wilkinson declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN at 6:30 p.m. Public Speaker: Mr. Jim Snellenberger, Desert Land Holdings LLC, Palm Desert, CA - introduced himself, gave a detailed description of the project and answered the Commission's questions with regards to the project's driveways, lot dimensions, guest parking, and anticipated price points of proposed homes. Public Speaker: Marion Ellson, La Quinta, CA - introduced herself and spoke in support of the project. Public Speaker: Karl Holt, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself and spoke in opposition of the project. He noted he had submitted written comments to the Commission prior to the meeting. He expressed concerns regarding the proposed zone change, project density, dust issues, loss of view and open space, traffic issues, setbacks, and proposed utility easement. Public Speaker: Dr. Chris DeSalva, La Quinta, CA - introduced himself and expressed concerns regarding the project's density, its impact on his view, and the potential of a requirement for him to convert from a septic system to sewer in the future. Staff explained the City does not require the conversion of existing septic systems to sewer. Staff stated that the Coachella Valley Water District does not require hookup to sewer so long as the existing septic system is not failing. Public Speaker: Joyce Mendal, La Quinta, CA - introduced herself and shared her concerns regarding traffic issues on Palm Circle Drive. Chairperson Wilkerson declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED at 7:27 p.m. Motion - A motion was made and seconded by Commissioners Bettencourt/Fitzpatrick to adopt Planning Commission Resolution No. 2016-0007 to approve recommending City Council approval of Environmental Assessment 2015-0002, Zone Change 2015- 0001, Specific Plan 2015-0002, Site Development Permit 2015-0002, and Tentative PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 2 MAY 10, 2016 Tract Map 2015-0003 (TTM 36875) as submitted with the following additions and amendments to the Conditions of Approval: • Applicant to demonstrate that an additional eight parking spaces can be provided on -street for guest parking; • Applicant to add requirement that the CC&Rs address guest parking regulations within the project adding a Condition of Approval to the Site Development Permit and Tentative Tract Map; • Amendment to Condition of Approval No. 77 of the Site Development Permit to read, "Applicant shall incorporate a pedestrian pathway that provides access from the street or garage to the front door for each of the homes"; and • Applicant to provide block wall detail and cross sections for the perimeter wall around the project. Motion passed unanimously. BUSINESS SESSION - None COMMISSIONER ITEMS - None DIRECTOR'S ITEMS 1. Planning Manager Perez said the City Council approved the Development Code Tune -Up. He stated that a report of staff level reviews regarding permits and development projects will be available on the City's website. 2. Planning Manager Perez said effective July 1, 2016, one Commissioner will be termed -out per the City's Municipal Code, which will create a vacancy, and one Commissioner will be eligible for re -appointment. He noted a Special City Council meeting is scheduled for June 8, 2016, to conduct interviews of all Boards' and Commissions' candidates. 3. Planning Manager Perez requested that the Commission provide feedback to staff regarding moving towards paperless agenda packets and transitioning to the use of iPads instead. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Blum/Wright to adjourn this meeting at 7:44 p.m. Motion passed unanimously. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 3 MAY 10, 2016 Respectfully submitted, WANDA WISE-LATTA, Executive Assistant City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 4 MAY 10, 2016 PH 1 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 24, 2016 CASE NUMBER: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH PROPERTY OWNER: MANUEL ABARCA REQUEST: SUBDIVIDE AN APPROXIMATELY 4.6 ACRE SITE INTO TEN RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND FIND THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT CEQA: THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS DETERMINED THAT THIS PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 15332 (CLASS 32) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT IN THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT CAN BE CHARACTERIZED AS IN -FILL DEVELOPMENT LOCATION: MONROE STREET, BETWEEN AVENUE 54 AND AIRPORT BOULEVARD RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt a resolution recommending to City Council approval of the subdivision of an approximately 4.6-acre site into ten single-family residential lots and find the project exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • The applicant proposes to subdivide an approximately 4.6-acre site into ten single-family residential lots (Attachment 1). • The proposed subdivision conforms to the design guidelines and standards of the La Quinta General Plan and Municipal Code. BACKGROUND The project site is located west of Monroe Street, between Avenue 54 and Airport Boulevard (Attachment 2). To the north of the project site is an existing residential community, the Estates at La Quinta. To the west of the project site is an existing single-family residence with private equestrian facilities. To the south of the project site is Monterra, a residential community under construction. To the east of the Page 1 of 4 project site, across Monroe Street, is vacant land outside of City limits. The General Plan land use designation of the property is Low Density Residential. The property is zoned Low Density Residential and is located within an Equestrian Overlay district, which permits equestrian -related accessory uses. An improved driveway currently exists along an existing 40-foot easement on the northern portion of the site, providing the property to the west access to Monroe Street. Much of the remainder of the site has utilized as materials/vehicle storage and enclosed equestrian facilities for the property to the west. PROPOSAL & ANALYSIS Overview: The proposal is to subdivide the subject property into ten single-family residential lots varying in size from 10,200 to 11,800 square feet (Attachment 3). Access to the tract will be provided on Monroe Street (right -in, right -out), and a private cul-de-sac street will provide access to the lots. The existing private gate that serves the property to the west will be replaced with a community gate and turnaround area. A retention basin is located near the entrance to the project, and two additional open space lots are provided. Existing block walls will be utilized along the northern and southern property boundaries, and a block wall will be constructed along the eastern and western perimeters. No residential units are proposed at this time. If custom homes are proposed at a future date, a final landscaping plan will be required for the common and perimeter landscaping areas, and will be reviewed by the Architecture and Landscaping Review Board (ALRB) prior to Final Map approval. If tract homes are proposed, the architectural and landscaping plans will be reviewed by the ALRB, as well as the Planning Commission. The proposal, as conditioned, complies with applicable General Plan goals, policies, and programs, as well as zoning and development standards. The proposed map represents a density of 2.1 units per acre, which is within the required 2 - 4 units per acre required by the Municipal Code. The map is subject to LQMC Section 9.50.100, which identifies unique development standards that applies to all new subdivisions less than ten acres in size located in the southern segment of the City (Attachment 4). These standards include a 10,000 square foot minimum lot size as well as open space and landscaped parkway requirements. This map has been designed to be consistent with these standards. Opposition from Neighboring Properties: The owners of the property abutting the project site to the west, the Ziegler family, and residents of the Estates at La Quinta to the north have expressed opposition to the proposed subdivision. In general, the Ziegler family has expressed opposition to the proposal due to uncertainty of continued access to their property. The recommended conditions of Page 2 of 4 approval require the applicant to construct a 32-foot wide road, secure a restoration bond as part of the street improvements, and provide a temporary access road during construction. Utility lines will also be extended to the end of the cul-de-sac as part of the street improvements. The Ziegler's remain opposed to the proposed subdivision (Attachment 5). Residents of the Estates at La Quinta oppose the map due to the proposed density and configuration, building heights, and potential impact on views. The Estates is a custom -home subdivision with a density of 0.73 units per acre. When approved in 1991, the zoning designation of the Estates at La Quinta (R-1-20,000) required a minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet; yet, the fourteen -lot subdivision was ultimately approved with a minimum lot size of 54,450 square feet. Directly to the south of this proposed subdivision is the Monterra single-family residential tract, which is currently under construction. Monterra was approved with a density of 2.86 units per acre, with lot sizes varying between 10,000 to 15,000 square feet, which is comparable to the 2.1 dwelling units per acre and 10,000 square foot minimum lot size of this proposal. The Municipal Code does permit two-story homes (28-foot height) for this zoning district, and two-story homes currently exist within the Estates; however, this proposal does not include architectural plans. Custom home plans would be reviewed administratively, and tract home plans would be reviewed by the Planning Commission. Throughout the review process, City staff met with the homeowners and facilitated a neighborhood meeting. The property owners of the Estates remain opposed to the proposed subdivision (Attachment 6). AGENCY & PUBLIC REVIEW Public Agency Review: This request was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies. All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Design and Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Public Notice: This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 13, 2016, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received. Any written comments received will be handed out at the Planning Commission hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department has determined that this project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act in that the proposed project can be characterized as in -fill development. Prepared by: Jay S. Wuu, AICP, Principal Planner Page 3 of 4 Approved for submission by: Gabriel Perez, Planning Manager Attachments: 1. Project Information 2. Project Area Map 3. Tentative Tract Map 36817 4. La Quinta Municipal Code Section 9.50.100 (Ordinance 440) 5. Letter of Opposition: Ziegler Family 6. Letters of Opposition: Estates at La Quinta Page 4 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL TO SUBDIVIDE AN APPROXIMATELY 4.6 ACRE SITE INTO TEN RESIDENTIAL LOTS AND FIND THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT CASE NUMBER: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 24th day of May, 2016, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Tentative Tract Map 36817, a request by Essi Shahandeh to subdivide approximately 4.6 acres into ten residential lots, generally located on Monroe Street, between Avenue 54 and Airport Boulevard, more particularly described as: APN: 767-580-014 WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 13, 2016 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 13.12.130 of the Municipal Code to justify recommendation of said Tentative Tract Map: 1. The proposed tentative tract map is consistent with the La Quinta General Plan. The proposed map conforms to the design guidelines and standards of the General Plan for Low Density Residential designated properties, as set forth in the Land Use Element, in that it will facilitate the construction of additional residential options while maintaining residential development standards including setbacks, pad elevations, and other design and performance standards that assure a high quality of development. The project density of approximately 2.1 units per acre is consistent with the Low Density Residential land use designation of up to four dwelling units per acre, as set forth in the General Plan. 2. The design or improvement of the proposed tentative tract map is consistent with the city General Plan in that its street and parcel design are Planning Commission Resolution 2016 - Tentative Tract Map 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) Applicant: Essi Shahandeh Owner: Manuel Abarca Page 2 of 3 in conformance with applicable goals, policies, and development standards, and will provide adequate infrastructure and public utilities. 3. The design of the tentative tract map and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause substantial environmental damage nor substantially injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. The Design and Development Department has determined that this project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act in that the proposed project can be characterized as in -fill development. 4. The design of the tentative tract map and the proposed improvements are not likely to cause serious public health problems. As conditioned, the proposed tentative tract map will not result in any increased hazard to public health or welfare, as the design has been reviewed by the appropriate responsible agencies for health and safety issues, with none identified. 5. The site of the proposed tentative tract map is physically suitable for the type of development and proposed density of development. As conditioned, the proposed design of the subdivision is physically compatible with the site with regards to level topography for the type of land use designation and potential development of the subject property, and in consideration of existing residential development in the surrounding area. 6. As conditioned, the proposed tentative tract map is consistent with all applicable provisions of this title and the La Quinta Zoning Ordinance, including, but not limited to, minimum lot area requirements, any other applicable provisions of this code, and the Subdivision Map Act. 7. As conditioned, the design of the tentative tract map will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision, for access through or use of the property within the subdivision in that access is provided within the project and to adjacent public streets. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case. Planning Commission Resolution 2016 - Tentative Tract Map 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) Applicant: Essi Shahandeh Owner: Manuel Aborca Page 3 of 3 SECTION 2. That the Planning Commission does hereby recommend approval of Tentative Tract Map 36817 to the City Council, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this the 24th day of May, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ROBERT WILKINSON, Chairperson City of La Quinta, California I_11i9*119 GABRIEL PEREZ, Planning Manager City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 1 of 23 M4901d!7A\1 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Tentative Tract Map, or any Final Map recorded thereunder. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. This Tentative Tract Map, and any Final Map recorded thereunder, shall comply with the requirements and standards of Government Code §§ 66410 through 66499.58 (the "Subdivision Map Act"), and Chapter 13 of the La Quinta Municipal Code ("LQMC"). The City of La Quinta's Municipal Code can be accessed on the City's Web Site at www.la-quinta.org. 3. This Tentative Tract Map shall expire on June 21, 2018, two years from the date of City Council approval, unless recorded or granted a time extension pursuant to the requirements of La Quinta Municipal Code 13.12.160 (Extensions of time for tentative maps). 4. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies: • Riverside County Fire Marshal • La Quinta Design and Development Department (Grading Permit, Green Sheet (Development Services Clearance) for Building Permits, Water Quality Management Plan(WQMP) Exemption Form - Whitewater River Region, Improvement Permit) • Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department • Coachella Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) • Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) • State Water Resources Control Board PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 2 of 23 SunLine Transit Agency (SunLine) South Coast Air Quality Management District Coachella Valley (SCAQMD) The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 5. Coverage under the State of California Construction General Permit must be obtained by the applicant, who then shall submit a copy of the Regional Water Quality Control Board's ("RWQCB") acknowledgment of the applicant's Notice of Intent ("NOI") and Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) number to the City prior to the issuance of a grading or building permit. 6. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions of the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, Sections 8.70.010 et seq. (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water), LQMC; Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For construction activities including clearing, grading or excavation of land that disturbs one (1) acre or more of land, or that disturbs less than one (1) acre of land, but which is a part of a construction project that encompasses more than one (1) acre of land, the Permitee shall be required to submit a Storm Water Pollution Protection Plan ("SWPPP") to the State Water Resources Control Board. The applicant or design professional can obtain the California Stormwater Quality Association SWPPP template at www.cabmphandbooks.com for use in their SWPPP preparation. B. The applicant shall ensure that the required SWPPP is available for inspection at the project site at all times through and including acceptance of all improvements by the City. C. The applicant's SWPPP shall include provisions for all of the following Best Management Practices ("BMPs") (LQMC Section 8.70.020 (Definitions)): 1) Temporary Soil Stabilization (erosion control). PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 3 of 23 2) Temporary Sediment Control. 3) Wind Erosion Control. 4) Tracking Control. 5) Non -Storm Water Management. 6) Waste Management and Materials Pollution Control. D. All erosion and sediment control BMPs proposed by the applicant shall be approved by the City Engineer prior to any onsite or offsite grading, pursuant to this project. E. The SWPPP and BMPs shall remain in effect for the entire duration of project construction until all improvements are completed and accepted by the City Council. F. The inclusion in the Homeowners' Association (HOA) Conditions, Covenants, and Restrictions (CC&Rs), a requirement for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs as required; and the applicant shall execute and record an agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of all post -construction BMPs is required. 6. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. PROPERTY RIGHTS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 4 of 23 8. Prior to issuance of any permit(s), the applicant shall acquire or confer easements and other property rights necessary for the construction or proper functioning of the proposed development. Conferred rights shall include irrevocable offers to dedicate or grant access easements to the City for emergency services and for maintenance, construction and reconstruction of essential improvements. 9. Pursuant to the aforementioned condition, conferred rights shall include approvals from the master developer or the HOA over easements and other property rights necessary for construction and proper functioning of the proposed development not limited to access rights over open space/drainage facilities of the master development. 10. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map all public street right-of- ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 11. The public street right-of-way offers for dedication required for this development include: A. PUBLIC STREETS 1) Monroe Street (Primary Arterial) - 54 feet from the centerline of Monroe Street for a total 108-foot ultimate developed right of way. 12. The applicant shall retain for private use on the Final Map all private street right- of-ways in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and/or as required by the City Engineer. 13. The private street right-of-ways to be retained for private use required for this development include: A. PRIVATE STREETS Private residential streets measured gutter flow line to gutter flow line shall have a 36-foot travel width. The travel width may be reduced to 32 feet with parking restricted to one side, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&R's. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. B. CUL DE SACS PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 5 of 23 1) The cut de sac shall conform to the shape shown on the tentative map with a 38-foot curb radius at the bulb or larger as shown on the tentative map. 14. Right-of-way geometry for standard cul-de-sacs and property line corner cut -backs at curb returns shall conform to Riverside County Standard Drawings #800, and #805, respectively, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 15. Dedications shall include additional widths as necessary for dedicated right and left turn lanes, bus turnouts, and other features contained in the approved construction plans. Pursuant to this requirement, the Applicant shall include in the submittal packet containing the draft final map submitted for map checking, an offsite street geometric layout, drawn at 1 inch equals 40 feet, detailing the following design aspects: median curb line, outside curb line, lane line alignment including lane widths, left turn lanes, deceleration lane(s) and bus stop turnout(s). The geometric layout shall be accompanied with sufficient professional engineering studies to confirm the appropriate length of all proposed turn pockets and auxiliary lanes that may impact the right of way dedication required of the project and the associated landscape setback requirement 16. When the City Engineer determines that access rights to the proposed street right- of-ways shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map are necessary prior to approval of the Final Map dedicating such right-of-ways, the applicant shall grant the necessary right-of-ways within 60 days of a written request by the City. 17. The applicant shall offer for dedication on the Final Map a ten -foot wide public utility easement contiguous with, and along the south side of the private street. Such easement may be reduced to five feet in width with the express written approval of IID. 18. The applicant shall create perimeter landscaping setbacks along all public right-of- ways as follows: A. Monroe Street (Primary Arterial) - 20 feet from the R/W-P/L. The listed setback depth shall be the average depth where a meandering wall design is approved. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 6 of 23 The setback requirements shall apply to all frontages including, but not limited to, remainder parcels and sites dedicated for utility purposes. Where public facilities (e.g., sidewalks) are placed on privately -owned setbacks, the applicant shall offer for dedication blanket easements for those purposes on the Final Map. 19. The applicant shall offer for dedication those easements necessary for the placement of, and access to, utility lines and structures, drainage basins, mailbox clusters, park lands, and common areas on the Final Map. 20. Direct vehicular access to Monroe Street from lots with frontage along Monroe Street is restricted, or as otherwise conditioned in these conditions of approval. The vehicular access restriction shall be shown on the recorded final tract map. 21. The applicant shall furnish proof of easements, or written permission, as appropriate, from those owners of all abutting properties on which grading, retaining wall construction, permanent slopes, or other encroachments will occur. 22. The applicant acknowledges the rights of the Public for Roads, Public Utilities and Public Service uses over the northerly 40 feet of the property as described in a Declaration of Dedication recorded November 6, 1972 as Instrument 147986 of Official Records. The applicant acknowledges the rights of the adjacent property owner to the west (currently identified as APN 767-580-013) in that they hold an easement for ingress and egress described in a Corporation Grant Deed recorded November 28, 1972 as Instrument 157027 of Official Records, which is junior to the aforementioned Declaration of Dedication. The applicant shall maintain the neighbors rights by offering the adjacent owner an ingress and egress easement over the reconfigured Lot A on the Final Map. Upon completion and acceptance, by City Engineer, of construction of the street improvements over reconfigured Lot A and granting of an ingress and egress easement over the reconfigured Lot A to the adjacent owner, applicant shall apply for the existing easement for Public Roads, Public Utilities and Public Service uses over the northerly 40 feet of the property as described in the aforementioned Declaration of Dedication recorded November 6, 1972 as Instrument 147986 of Official Records to be vacated by the City. The applicant shall cause no easement to be granted, or recorded, over any portion of the subject property between the date of approval of the Tentative Tract Map and the date of recording of any Final Map, unless such easement is approved by the City Engineer. 90i_I■IiAIIiI PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 7 of 23 23. Prior to the City's approval of a Final Map, the applicant shall furnish accurate mylars of the Final Map. The Final Map shall be 1 inch = 40 feet scale. IMPROVEMENT PLANS As used throughout these Conditions of Approval, professional titles such as "engineer," "surveyor," and "architect," refer to persons currently certified or licensed to practice their respective professions in the State of California. 24. Improvement plans shall be prepared by or under the direct supervision of qualified engineers and/or architects, as appropriate, and shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.040 (Improvement Plans), LQMC. 25. The following improvement plans shall be prepared and submitted for review and approval by the Design and Development Department. A separate set of plans for each line item specified below shall be prepared. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the City Engineer in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvement plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. A. B. C. D. E. F. On -Site Rough Grading Plan PM10 Plan SWPPP WQMP 1 inch = 40 feet Horizontal 1 inch = 40 feet Horizontal 1 inch = 40 feet Horizontal (Plan submitted in Report Form) NOTE: A through D to be submitted concurrently. Off -Site Street Improvements/Storm Drain Plan 1 inch = 40 feet Horizontal, 1 inch = 4 feet Vertical Off -Site Signing & Striping Plan 1 inch = 40 feet Horizontal PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 8 of 23 The Off -Site street improvement plans shall have separate plan sheet(s) (drawn at 20 scale) that show the meandering sidewalk, mounding, and berming design in the combined parkway and landscape setback area. G. On -Site Street Improvements/Signing & Striping/Storm Drain Plan 1 inch = 40 feet Horizontal, 1 inch= 4 feet Vertical NOTE: E through F to be submitted concurrently. (Separate Storm Drain Plans if applicable) The following plans shall be submitted to the Building and Safety Division for review and approval. The plans shall utilize the minimum scale specified, unless otherwise authorized by the Building Official in writing. Plans may be prepared at a larger scale if additional detail or plan clarity is desired. Note, the applicant may be required to prepare other improvements plans not listed here pursuant to improvements required by other agencies and utility purveyors. H. On -Site Residential Precise Grading Plan 1 inch = 30 feet Horizontal Other engineered improvement plans prepared for City approval that are not listed above shall be prepared in formatted approved by the City Engineer prior to commencing plan preparation. All Off -Site Plan & Profile Street Plans and Signing & Striping Plans shall show all existing improvements for a distance of at least 200 feet beyond the project limits, or a distance sufficient to show any required design transitions. All On -Site Signing & Striping Plans shall show, at a minimum; Stop Signs, Limit Lines and Legends, No parking Signs, Raised Pavement Markers (including Blue RPMs at fire hydrant) and Street name Signs per Public Works Standard Plans and/or as approved by the Design and Development Department. "Rough Grading" plans shall normally include perimeter walls with Top Of Wall & Top Of Footing elevations shown. All footings shall have a minimum of one (1) foot of cover, or sufficient cover to clear any adjacent obstructions. 26. The City maintains standard plans, detail sheets and/or construction notes for elements of construction which can be accessed via the "Plans, Notes and Design Guidance" section of the Public Works Division at the City website (www.la- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 9 of 23 quinta.org). Please navigate to the Public Works Division home page and look for the Standard Drawings hyperlink. 27. The applicant shall furnish a complete set of all approved improvement plans on a storage media acceptable to the City Engineer (currently mylars). 28. Upon completion of construction, and prior to final acceptance of the improvements by the City, the applicant shall furnish the City with reproducible record drawings of all improvement plans which were approved by the City. Each sheet shall be clearly marked "Record Drawing" and shall be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy and completeness of the drawings. The applicant shall have all approved mylars previously submitted to the City, revised to reflect the as -built conditions. The applicant shall employ or retain the Engineer Of Record during the construction phase of the project so that the FOR can make site visits in support of preparing "Record Drawing". However, if subsequent approved revisions have been approved by the City Engineer and reflect said "Record Drawing" conditions, the Engineer Of Record may submit a letter attesting to said fact to the City Engineer in lieu of mylar submittal. IMPROVEMENT SECURITY AGREEMENTS 29. Prior to approval of any Final Map, the applicant shall construct all on and off -site improvements and satisfy its obligations for same, or shall furnish a fully secured and executed Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") guaranteeing the construction of such improvements and the satisfaction of its obligations for same, or shall agree to any combination thereof, as may be required by the City. 30. Any Subdivision Improvement Agreement ("SIA") entered into by and between the applicant and the City of La Quinta, for the purpose of guaranteeing the completion of any improvements related to this Tentative Tract Map, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 13.28 (Improvement Security), LQMC. 31. Improvements to be made, or agreed to be made, shall include the removal of any existing structures or other obstructions which are not a part of the proposed improvements; and shall provide for the setting of the final survey monumentation. 32. Depending on the timing of the development of this Tentative Tract Map, and the status of the off -site improvements at the time, the applicant may be required to: A. Construct certain off -site improvements. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 10 of 23 B. Construct additional off -site improvements, subject to the reimbursement of its costs by others. C. Reimburse others for those improvements previously constructed that are considered to be an obligation of this tentative tract map. D. Secure the costs for future improvements that are to be made by others. E. To agree to any combination of these actions, as the City may require. Off -Site Improvements should be completed on a first priority basis. The applicant shall complete Off -Site Improvements in the first phase of construction or by the issuance of the 20 % Building Permit. In the event that any of the improvements required for this development are constructed by the City, the applicant shall, prior to the approval of the Final Map, or the issuance of any permit related thereto, reimburse the City for the costs of such improvements. 33. If the applicant elects to utilize the secured agreement alternative, the applicant shall submit detailed construction cost estimates for all proposed on -site and off - site improvements, including an estimate for the final survey monumentation, for checking and approval by the City Engineer. Such estimates shall conform to the unit cost schedule as approved by the City Engineer. At the time the applicant submits its detailed construction cost estimates for conditional approval of the Final Map by the City Council, the applicant shall also submit one copy each of an 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches reduction of each page of the Final Map, along with a copy of an 8-1/2 inches x 11 inches Vicinity Map. Estimates for improvements under the jurisdiction of other agencies shall be approved by those agencies and submitted to the City along with the applicant's detailed cost estimates. Security will not be required for telephone, natural gas, or Cable T.V. improvements. 34. Should the applicant fail to construct the improvements for the development, or fail to satisfy its obligations for the development in a timely manner, the City shall have the right to halt issuance of building permits, and/or final building inspections, withhold other approvals related to the development of the project, or call upon the surety to complete the improvements. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 11 of 23 %4?1*151110 re 35. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.050 (Grading Improvements), LQMC. 36. Prior to occupancy of the project site for any construction, or other purposes, the applicant shall obtain a grading permit approved by the City Engineer. 37. To obtain an approved grading permit, the applicant shall submit and obtain approval of all of the following: A. A grading plan prepared by a civil engineer registered in the State of California. Grading plan shall show the proposed location of the Temporary Access Road as described in Condition No. 38, B. On -Site Street Improvement and Signing & Striping Plan. C. An application for an encroachment permit to do any work within the 40 foot public right of way easement on the northerly part of the property. Applicant shall submit a restoration bond for replacement of the roadway improvements currently within the easement to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. D. A preliminary geotechnical ("soils") report prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California, E. A Fugitive Dust Control Plan prepared in accordance with LQMC Chapter 6.16, (Fugitive Dust Control), and F. A Best Management Practices report prepared in accordance with LQMC Sections 8.70.010 and 13.24.170 (NPDES Stormwater Discharge Permit and Storm Management and Discharge Controls). G. A WQMP prepared by an engineer registered in the State of California. All grading shall conform with the recommendations contained in the Preliminary Soils Report, and shall be certified as being adequate by soils engineer, or engineering geologist registered in the State of California. A statement shall appear on the Final Map that a soils report has been prepared in accordance with the California Health & Safety Code § 17953. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 12 of 23 The applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the City, and in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the approved Fugitive Dust Control Plan provisions as submitted with its application for a grading permit. Additionally, the applicant shall replenish said security if expended by the City of La Quinta to comply with the Plan as required by the City Engineer. 38. At all times the applicant shall maintain the rights of the public and the westerly neighbor for access in the public easement located in the northerly 40 of the subject property as identified in Condition 22. In the event the applicant must interrupt ingress and egress over this area to construct the improvements in Lot A as proposed on the Tentative Map, the applicant shall grant to the City a Temporary Access Easement and shall construct an access road in compliance with the requirements below for the purpose of maintaining the interests of the Public and ingress and egress to the westerly neighbor. Upon completion of improvements in Lot A, the Temporary Access Easement shall terminate and the temporary road may be removed. Fire Apparatus temporary access road shall be in compliance with the Riverside County Fire Department Standard number 06-06 (located at www.rvcfire.org). Temporary access road will not have an up, or downgrade of more than 15%. Temporary access road shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance not less than 13 feet and 6 inches. Temporary access road will be designed to withstand the weight of 60 thousand pounds over 2 axles. Access will have a turning radius capable of accommodating fire apparatus. Temporary access road shall be constructed with a surface so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. 39. Grading within the perimeter setback and parkway areas shall have undulating terrain and shall conform with the requirements of LQMC Section 9.60.240(F) except as otherwise modified by this condition. The maximum slope shall not exceed 3:1 anywhere in the landscape setback area, except for the backslope (i.e. the slope at the back of the landscape lot) which shall not exceed 2:1 if fully planted with ground cover. The maximum slope in the first six (6) feet adjacent to the curb shall not exceed 4:1 when the nearest edge of sidewalk is within six feet (6 feet) of the curb, otherwise the maximum slope within the right of way shall not exceed 3:1. All unpaved parkway areas adjacent to the curb shall be depressed one and one-half (1.5) inches in the first eighteen (18) inches behind the curb. 40. Building pad elevations on the rough grading plan submitted for City Engineer's approval shall conform with pad elevations shown on the tentative map, unless the pad elevations have other requirements imposed elsewhere in these Conditions of Approval. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 13 of 23 41. Building pad elevations of perimeter lots shall not differ by more that one foot from the building pads in adjacent developments. Where compliance within the above stated limits is impractical, the City may consider alternatives that are shown to minimize safety concerns, maintenance difficulties and neighboring -owner dissatisfaction with the grade differential. 42. Prior to any site grading or regrading that will raise or lower any portion of the site by more than plus or minus half of a foot (0.5 foot) from the elevations shown on the approved Tentative Tract Map, the applicant shall submit the proposed grading changes to the City Engineer for a substantial conformance review. 43. Prior to the issuance of a building permit for any building lot, the applicant shall provide a lot pad certification stamped and signed by a qualified engineer or surveyor with applicable compaction tests and over excavation documentation. Each pad certification shall list the pad elevation as shown on the approved grading plan, the actual pad elevation and the difference between the two, if any. Such pad certification shall also list the relative compaction of the pad soil. The data shall be organized by lot number, and listed cumulatively if submitted at different times. DRAINAGE 44. Stormwater handling shall conform with the approved hydrology and drainage report for Tract Map No. 36817. Nuisance water shall be disposed of in an approved manner. 45. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.120 (Drainage), Retention Basin Design Criteria, Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. More specifically, stormwater falling on site during the 100 year storm shall be retained within the development, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. The design storm shall be either the 1-hour, 3-hour, 6-hour or 24-hour event producing the greatest total run off. 46. Nuisance water shall be retained on site. Nuisance water shall be disposed of per approved methods contained in Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 14 of 23 with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems and Engineering Bulletin No. 06-015 - Underground Retention Basin Design Requirements. 47. In design of retention facilities, the maximum percolation rate shall be two inches per hour. The percolation rate will be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site specific data indicating otherwise and as approved by the City Engineer. 48. The project shall be designed to accommodate purging and blowoff water (through underground piping and/or retention facilities) from any on -site or adjacent well sites granted or dedicated to the local water utility authority as a requirement for development of this property. 49. No fence or wall shall be constructed around any retention basin unless approved by the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. Walls required for noise attenuation are not included in this restriction. 50. For on -site above ground common retention basins, retention depth shall be according to Engineering Bulletin No. 06-16 - Hydrology Report with Preliminary Hydraulic Report Criteria for Storm Drain Systems. Side slopes shall not exceed 3:1 and shall be planted with maintenance free ground cover. Additionally, retention basin widths shall be not less than 20 feet at the bottom of the basin. 51. Stormwater may not be retained in landscaped parkways or landscaped setback lots. Only incidental storm water (precipitation which directly falls onto the setback) will be permitted to be retained in the landscape setback areas. The perimeter setback and parkway areas in the street right-of-way shall be shaped with berms and mounds, pursuant to LQMC Section 9.100.040(B)(7). 52. The design of the development shall not cause any increase in flood boundaries and levels in any area outside the development. 53. The development shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the development through a designated overflow and into the historic drainage relief route. 54. Storm drainage historically received from adjoining property shall be received and retained or passed through into the historic downstream drainage relief route. 55. The applicant shall comply with applicable provisions for post construction runoff per the City's NPDES stormwater discharge permit, LQMC Sections 8.70.010 et seq. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 15 of 23 (Stormwater Management and Discharge Controls), and 13.24.170 (Clean Air/Clean Water); Riverside County Ordinance No. 457; and the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 and the State Water Resources Control Board's Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ. A. For post -construction urban runoff from new development and redevelopment projects, the applicant shall implement requirements of the NPDES permit for the design, construction and perpetual operation and maintenance of BMPs per the approved Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for the project as required by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board - Colorado River Basin (CRWQCB-CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011. B. The applicant shall implement the WQMP Design Standards per (CRWQCB- CRB) Region Board Order No. R7-2013-0011 utilizing BMPs approved by the City Engineer. A project specific WQMP shall be provided which incorporates Site Design and Treatment BMPs utilizing first flush infiltration as a preferred method of NPDES Permit Compliance for Whitewater River receiving water, as applicable. C. The developer shall execute and record a Stormwater Management/BMP Facilities Agreement that provides for the perpetual maintenance and operation of stormwater BMPs. UTILITIES 56. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of Section 13.24.110 (Utilities), LQMC. 57. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for practical and aesthetic purposes. 58. Existing overhead utility lines within, or adjacent to the proposed development, and all proposed utilities shall be installed underground. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) APPLICANT: ESSI SHAHANDEH OWNER: MANUEL MANUEL ABARCA ADOPTED: MAY 24, 2016 Page 16 of 23 All existing utility lines attached to joint use 92 KV transmission power poles are exempt from the requirement to be placed underground. 59. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements maintained, or required, by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 60. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Sections 13.24.060 (Street Improvements), 13.24.070 (Street Design - Generally) & 13.24.100 (Access for Individual Properties and Development) for public streets; and Section 13.24.080 (Street Design - Private Streets), where private streets are proposed. 61. Streets shall have vertical curbs or other approved curb configurations that will convey water without ponding, and provide lateral containment of dust and residue during street sweeping operations. If a wedge or rolled curb design is approved, the lip at the flowline shall be near vertical with a 1/8" batter and a minimum height of 0.1'. Unused curb cuts on any lot shall be restored to standard curb height prior to final inspection of permanent building(s) on the lot. 62. The applicant shall construct the following street improvements to conform with the General Plan (street type noted in parentheses.) A. OFF -SITE STREETS 1) Monroe Street (Primary Arterial): Widen the west side of the street along all frontage adjacent to the Tentative Map boundary to its ultimate width on the west side as specified in the General Plan and the requirements of these conditions. Rehabilitate and/or reconstruct existing roadway pavement as necessary to augment and convert it from a rural county -road design standard to La Quinta's urban arterial design standard. The west curb face shall be located thirty- nine feet (39') west of the centerline, except at locations where additional street width is needed to accommodate: a) Bus turnout (if required by Sunline Transit) Planning Commission Resolution 2016- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Tentative Tract Map 36817 Abarca March 8, 2016 Page 17 of 23 Other required improvements in the Monroe Street right or way and/or adjacent landscape setback area include: b) All appurtenant components such as, but not limited to: curb, gutter, traffic control striping, legends, and signs. c) 8-foot wide meandering sidewalk. The meandering sidewalk shall have an arrhythmic horizontal layout that utilizes concave and convex curves with respect to the curb line that touches the back of curb at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. The sidewalk curvature radii should vary between 50 and 300 feet, and at each point of reverse curvature, the radius should change to assist in creating the arrhythmic layout. The sidewalk shall meander into the landscape setback lot and approach within five (5) feet of the multi -use trail at intervals not to exceed 250 feet. d) Half width of a 16-foot wide raised landscaped median along the entire boundary of the Tentative Tract Map or as approved by the City Engineer. Left turn out and left turn in movements are restricted. The applicant shall extend improvements beyond the subdivision boundaries to ensure they safely integrate with existing improvements (e.g., grading; traffic control devices and transitions in alignment, elevation or dimensions of streets and sidewalks). B. PRIVATE STREETS 1) Private Residential Streets measured at gutter flow line to gutter flow line shall have a 32-foot travel width with parking restricted to one side and provided there is adequate off-street parking for residents and visitors, and the applicant establishes provisions for ongoing enforcement of the parking restriction in the CC&R's. The CC&R's shall be reviewed and approved by the Design and Development Department prior to recordation. 2) The location of driveways of corner lots shall not be located within the curb return and away from the intersection when possible. C. PRIVATE CUL DE SACS 1) Shall be constructed according to the lay -out shown on the tentative map with 38-foot curb radius or greater at the bulb similar to the layout shown on the rough grading plan. Planning Commission Resolution 2016- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Tentative Tract Map 36817 Abarca March 8, 2016 Page 18 of 23 63. All gated entries shall provide for a three -car minimum stacking capacity for inbound traffic to be a minimum length of 62 feet from call box to the street; and shall provide for a full turn -around outlet for non -accepted vehicles. Where a gated entry is proposed, the applicant shall demonstrate that those passenger vehicles that do not gain entry into the development can safely make a full turn -around (minimum radius to be 24 feet) out onto the main street from the gated entry. Pursuant to said condition, there shall be a minimum of twenty five feet width provided at the turn -around opening provided. Two lanes of traffic shall be provided on the entry side of each gated entry, one lane shall be dedicated for residents, and one lane for visitors. The two travel lanes shall be a minimum of 20 feet of total paved roadway surface or as approved by the Fire Department. Entry drives, main interior circulation routes, standard knuckles, corner cutbacks, bus turnouts, dedicated turn lanes and other features shown on the approved construction plans, may require additional street widths as may be determined by the City Engineer. 64. The applicant shall design street pavement sections using CalTrans' design procedure for 20-year life pavement, and the site -specific data for soil strength and anticipated traffic loading (including construction traffic). Minimum structural sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0 inches a.c./4.5 inches c.a.b. Primary Arterial 4.5 inches a.c./6.0 inches c.a.b. or the approved equivalents of alternate materials. 65. The applicant shall submit current mix designs (less than two years old at the time of construction) for base, asphalt concrete and Portland cement concrete. The submittal shall include test results for all specimens used in the mix design procedure. For mix designs over six months old, the submittal shall include recent (less than six months old at the time of construction) aggregate gradation test results confirming that design gradations can be achieved in current production. The applicant shall not schedule construction operations until mix designs are approved. 66. General access points and turning movements of traffic are limited to the following: Primary Entry (Monroe Street): Right turn in, and right turn out. 67. Improvements shall include appurtenances such as traffic control signs, markings and other devices, raised medians if required, street name signs and sidewalks. Mid -block street lighting is not required. Planning Commission Resolution 2016- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Tentative Tract Map 36817 Abarca March 8, 2016 Page 19 of 23 68. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with City -adopted standards, supplemental drawings and specifications, or as approved by the City Engineer. Improvement plans for streets, access gates and parking areas shall be stamped and signed by qualified engineers. CONSTRUCTION 69. The City will conduct final inspections of habitable buildings only when the buildings have improved street and (if required) sidewalk access to publicly -maintained streets. The improvements shall include required traffic control devices, pavement markings and street name signs. If on -site streets in residential developments are initially constructed with partial pavement thickness, the applicant shall complete the pavement prior to final inspections of the last ten percent of homes within the development or when directed by the City, whichever comes first. FIRE PROTECTION 70. For residential areas, approved standard fire hydrants, located at each intersection, with no portion of any lot frontage more than a maximum of 500 feet from a hydrant. Minimum fire flow for all residential structures shall be 1500 GPM for a two hour duration at 20 PSI. 71. The required water system, including fire hydrants, shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. Two sets of water plans are to be submitted to the Fire Department for approval. 72. Applicant/Developer shall mount blue dot retro-reflectors pavement markers on private streets, public streets and driveways to indicated location of the fire hydrant. It should be 8 inches from centerline to the side that the fire hydrant is on, to identify fire hydrant locations. 73. The minimum dimension for gates is 20 feet clear and unobstructed width and a minimum vertical clearance of 13 feet 6 inches in height. Any gate providing access from a road shall be located at least 35 feet setback from the roadway and shall open to allow a vehicle to stop without obstructing traffic on the road. Where a one-way road with a single traffic lane provides access to a gate entrance, a 38-foot turning radius shall be used. 74. Gates may be automatic or manual and shall be equipped with a rapid entry system (KNOX). Plans shall be submitted to the Fire Department for approval prior to installation. Automatic gate pins shall be rated with a shear pin force, not to exceed 30 Planning Commission Resolution 2016- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Tentative Tract Map 36817 Abarca March 8, 2016 Page 20 of 23 pounds. Gates activated by the rapid entry system shall remain open until closed by the rapid entry system. Automatic gates shall be provided with backup power. 75. Fire Apparatus access road and driveways shall be in compliance with the Riverside County Fire Department Standard number 06-05 (located at www.rvcfire.org). Access lanes will not have an up, or downgrade of more than 15%. Access roads shall have an unobstructed vertical clearance not less than 13 feet and 6 inches. Access lanes will be designed to withstand the weight of 80 thousand pounds over 2 axles. Access will have a turning radius capable of accommodating fire apparatus. Access lane shall be constructed with a surface so as to provide all weather driving capabilities. 76. Roadways may not exceed 1,320 feet without secondary access. This access may be restricted to emergency vehicles only however, public egress must be unrestricted. 77. Any turn -around requires a minimum 38-foot turning radius. LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION 78. The applicant shall comply with LQMC Sections 13.24.130 (Landscaping Setbacks) & 13.24.140 (Landscaping Plans). 79. Prior to issuance of any grading permit, the applicant shall submit a Final Landscape Plan application (FLP) for review and approval before the Architecture and Landscape Review Board (ALRB). The landscape plans shall include appropriate data to confirm compliance with Section9.50.100 of the LQMC, regarding provision of a minimum 25% open space throughout the tract, consistent with the approved TT 36817 exhibit. All such open space shall be shown to be accessible for passive and/or active recreational use. The FLIP shall have been approved by the ALRB prior to recordation of TT 36817. 80. After approval by the ALRB, the applicant shall process all landscape plans for final approval by the Planning Division with green sheet sign off by the Development Services Division, if applicable. When plan checking has been completed by the Planning Division, the applicant shall obtain the signatures of CVWD and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner, prior to submittal for signature by the Planning Manager. Landscape plans for landscaped medians on public streets shall be approved by the both the Planning Manager and the City Engineer. Where City Engineer approval is not required, the applicant shall submit for green sheet approval by the Development Services Division. Final landscape plans for on -site planting shall be reviewed by the Architecture and Landscape Review Committee and approved by the Planning Manager prior to issuance of first building permit. Final plans shall include all landscaping associated with this project. Planning Commission Resolution 2016- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Tentative Tract Map 36817 Abarca March 8, 2016 Page 21 of 23 NOTE: Plans are not approved for construction until signed by the Planning Manager. 81. The final landscape plan submittal shall incorporate the following provisions: A. Incorporation of a six-foot high block wall at Lot Band Lot C, and at Lot land Lot C. 82. Final field inspection of all landscaping materials, including all vegetation, hardscape and irrigation systems is required by the Planning Division prior to final project sign -off by the Planning Division. Prior to such field inspection, written verification by the project's landscape architect of record stating that all vegetation, hardscape and irrigation systems have been installed in accordance with the approved final landscape plans shall be submitted to the Planning Division. 83. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the Planning Manager. Use of lawn areas shall be minimized with no lawn, or spray irrigation, being placed within 24 inches of curbs along public streets. 84. The applicant or his agent has the responsibility for proper sight distance requirements per guidelines in the AASHTO "A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets" or latest edition, in the design and/or installation of all landscaping and appurtenances abutting and within the private and public street right-of-way. 85. Lighting plans shall be submitted with the final landscaping plans for a recommendation to the Planning Director for his approval. Exterior lighting shall be consistent with LQMC Section 9.100.150 (Outdoor Lighting). PUBLIC SERVICES 86. The applicant shall provide public transit improvements as may be required by SunLine Transit Agency and approved by the City Engineer. MAINTENANCE 87. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.160 (Maintenance). 88. The applicant shall make provisions for the continuous and perpetual maintenance of perimeter landscaping up to the curb, access drives, sidewalks, and stormwater BMPs. FEES AND DEPOSITS 89. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.180 (Fees and Deposits). These fees include all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposits and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for plan check and permits. Planning Commission Resolution 2016- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Tentative Tract Map 36817 Abarca March 8, 2016 Page 22 of 23 90. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the provisions of the Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee and Development Impact Fee programs in effect at the time of issuance of building permit(s). 91. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Art in Public Places program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. 92. Tentative Tract 36817 shall provide for parks through payment of an in -lieu fee, as specified in Chapter 13.48, LQMC. Based on the requirements of Section 13.48.050 LQMC, the amount of park land required for 11 lots is 0.084 acres. The in -lieu payment shall be based upon this acreage requirement, and on the fair market value of the land within the subdivision. Land value information shall be provided to the Planning Director, via land sale information, a current fair market value appraisal, or other information on land value within the subdivision. Payment of the in -lieu fee shall be made prior to, or concurrently with recordation of the first final map within the tentative map. 93. A fee shall be paid to Riverside County, as required by the County to post the Notice of Determination and offset costs associated with AB 3158 (Fish and Game Code 711.4). The fee shall be based on the established County fee schedule for filing a Negative Declaration for posting. The fee is to be payable to Riverside County, and is due to the Planning Department within 24 hours of City Council approval. 94. Applicant shall pay the fees as required by the Coachella Valley Unified School District, as in effect at the time requests for building permits are submitted. 95. Permits issued under this approval shall be subject to the Coachella Valley Multi -Species Habitat Conservation Plan/Natural Community Habitat Conservation Plan Mitigation Fee, in accordance with LQMC Chapter 3.34. PLANNING DIVISION 96. Within 30 days of the initiation of any ground disturbing activity on the project site, the project proponent shall cause a protocol -compliant burrowing owl survey to be completed, submitted to the Planning Division, and approved. Should the species be identified on the site, the biologist's recommendations for relocation shall be implemented prior to the issuance of any ground disturbance permit. 97. In the event of an unanticipated discovery, all work must be suspended within 50 feet of the find until a qualified archaeologist evaluates it. In the unlikely event that human remains are encountered during project development, all work must cease near the find immediately. In accordance with California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5, the County Coroner must be notified if potentially human bone is discovered. The Coroner will then determine within two working days of being notified if the remains are subject Planning Commission Resolution 2016- Conditions of Approval - RECOMMENDED Tentative Tract Map 36817 Abarca March 8, 2016 Page 23 of 23 to his or her authority. If the Coroner recognizes the remains to be Native American, he or she shall contact the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) by phone within 24 hours, in accordance with Public Resources Code Section 5097.98. The NAHC will then designate a Most Likely Descendant (MLD) with respect to the human remains. The MLD then has the opportunity to recommend to the property owner or the person responsible for the excavation work means for treating or disposing, with appropriate dignity, the human remains and associated grave goods. Work may not resume in the vicinity of the find until all requirements of the health and safety code have been met. If any resource recovery occurs, a final report shall be submitted to the Design and Development Department prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the project. 98. Review of architecture and landscaping for production and/or individual custom homes, shall be subject to Title 9, Section 9.60.330 and 9.60.340, LQMC, as applicable. The Planning Division shall determine if the units applied for constitute custom or production -level units. Any custom home design guidelines that may be required shall be reflected or referenced in the CC&R's for TTM 36817. 99. For any new and existing walls or wall sections, including any, entry and property line walls, a master wall plan shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division. The master wall plan shall specify colors and materials to be used for all existing and proposed walls, capping, pilasters, entry monuments, planters, and any other such features, as may be applicable. 100. Street name approval shall be required for Lot A, as proposed on the Tentative Tract Map exhibit. Street name(s) shall be reviewed by the Design and Development Department and Fire Department at or prior to final map plan checking. 101. As Monroe Street is a General Plan -designated Image Corridor, buildings within one hundred fifty feet of the edge of right-of-way shall be limited to single -story, with a maximum building height of 22 feet. 102. The CC&R's shall contain a disclosure that notifies potential owners that the property is within and adjacent to the City's Equestrian Overlay District zoning overlay. Proiect Information CASE NUMBER: APPLICANT: PROPERTY OWNER: ENGINEER: REQUEST: LOCATION: GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: ATTACHMENT 1 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 (TTM 2014-1004) ESSI SHAHANDEH MANUEL ABARCA ESSI ENGINEERING SUBDIVIDISION OF AN APPROXIMATELY 4.6 ACRE SITE INTO TEN RESIDENTIAL LOTS MONROE STREET, BETWEEN AVENUE 54 AND AIRPORT BOULEVARD LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY) NORTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY) EXISTING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY SOUTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY) RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY UNDER CONSTRUCTION EAST: CITY LIMIT VISTA SANTA ROSA WEST: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL (EQUESTRIAN OVERLAY) EXISTING SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE g +9 4 y r". r a Y♦ . P _i 4 : r m ■ e : 4k of gv' f of - I „ + n. c 4 I .r s_ • , • st .. - +� I ° r, F I! r � � - ., 1+� k : '� . Tyr � :�•`. , . . ,-i4, � '� : _ ,:;�'— • `��,. r I , r .y � , I r ., Ip OkI rs �T Altw THUNDERGULCHWAY - _Mao , io r .y 4 r , .F 55TH AVE - - r - : y - a w 4 , f :As �� - Y :: :.� c. f •, rz-�(' -., ;ate e 1 I ` *t? - w<• �r r L I Fr-44- 4•F ' r CI IF r • �„ i g y `qI T q 1 , FF 4 J i" FOUR SEASONS PLcn i Q FOUR SEASONS PL �. w_ J y, Ma • war V VE IML 11 BROWN DEER PARK F, . , 'a:� , ' n r ■ ` - • 9 r. u r + vH • ' ..� � a.,� I■ ■+LP_ � ' :r4,Mm� e .q e T ilk ..* � � �J. 4,. OL0 e .w �••C�, �`� 9 1 h Ar 16 IL dd 1-a 4 v M m I A - - t11 3 ..� sl'A'h*rl. "' M1 _... �. .... ,4 .., ,,, ... : �^c ,._-. ^^ ,�.. .. _.. .•+ ."y�,.: - r..A - - _ ■ �'*n`,e -r e - ..a4 _ .. �. 111F. � { - n .. ?�, �+� ..,r a'Pd�t■m�d -�: iA�'+'' r �.:.... _ --(�—'+31 - ,.,1�.,m � - �J .: we ^' , •y. - , f - , _ . lY ..r t ■ ?! 1 s A' wr J •. Y � yrF .. . TTM 36817 ProjectArea Site Map W VI E v` City of La Quinta ° Planning Division GEti'rqj lf=,DESEI,I— Community Development Department ATTACHMENT 3 CONTACT INFORMATION OWNER/DEVELOPER: A & M CONSTRUCTION P.O. BOX 366 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 760-564-4832 OFFICE 760-564-0406 FAX CONTACT: RICK MORRIS morrisam1@hotmail.com ENGINEER: ESSI ENGINEERING 77-570 SPRINGFIELD LANE, SUITE "C" PALM DESERT, CA 92211 760-772-8400 OFFICE 760-772-8421 FAX CONTACT: ESSI SHAHANDEH essi.shahahndeh®eeicompany.com UTILITY COMPANIES SEWER AND WATER BY CVWD ELECTRIC BY IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DISTRICT TELEPHONE BY VERIZON GAS BY THE GAS CO. CATV BY WARNER CABLE DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT GENERAL NOTES 1) THERE IS CONTIGUOUS OWNERSHIP 2) GROSS AREA = xxxxx SF (O.xxx AC), 3) LAND IS NOT SUBJECT TO OVERFLOW, INNUNDATION OR FLOOD HAZARD 4) EXISTING ZONING = R PROPOSED ZONING = R 5) EXISTING USE = VACANT SURROUNDING USE = SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED USE = SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NUMBER: 767-580-014 ADDRESS: �1 NOT AVAILABLE BENCHMARK —LOCAL BENCHMARK CITY OF LA QUINTA BENCHMARK 440, A 3.5" BRASS DISK, FLUSH IN CONCRETE 260' SOUTH OF THE B.C.R. OF THE SOUTHEAST CURB RETURN AT THE INTERSECTION OF MADISON STREET AND AVENUE 54, IN LA QUINTA, CA. ELEV: -7.116 (ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE SEA LEVEL DATUM +500.00) DATUM: NAVD88 NOTE: ADJACENT TRACT WAS PREPARED UNDER NAVD29. 2.32' WAS ADDED TO ALL ELEVATION FRON THAT DEVELOPMENT TO ASSURE CORRECT RELATIONSHIP TO PADS AND WALLS. BASIS OF BEARINGS THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.M. PER MB 427/63, BEING: NORTH 89'55'00" EAST LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, SAN BERNARDINO MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, ACCORDING TO THE OFFICIAL PLAT THEREOF, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 2 DEGREES 10'00" EAST, ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, 165 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 47' 20" WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, 1,272.98 FEET; THENCE NORTH 02 DEGREES 09' 00" WEST, PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER, 165.00 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST QUARTER; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 47' 20" EAST, ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER, 1,272.93 FEET, MORE OR LESS, TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; EXCEPT THAT PORTION CONVEYED TO THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, BY DEED RECORDED NOVEMBER 16, 1972 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 153001. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 15, T. 6 S., R. 7 E., S.B.M., DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 15, T. 6 S., R. 7 E., S.B.M.; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SOUTHEAST ONE -QUARTER OF SECTION 15, S. 89'53'27" W., 30.02 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE S. 89'53'27" W. 25.01 FEET; THENCE S. 02'03'59" E. 64.19 FEET; THENCE N. 87*56'01 " E. 25.00 FEET; THENCE N. 02'03'59" W. 63.34 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. LEGEND FINISHED SURFACE ............ FS PAD ELEVATION .............. PE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION ........FF PROPERTY LINE .............. PA TOP OF CURB .............. TC BUILDING SETBACK LINE.......... BSL RIGHT OF WAY ...............R/W TOP OF RETAINING WALL .........TRW TOP OF WALL ............... TW TOP OF FOOTING .............. TF NATURAL GRADE .............. NG FINISH GRADE ................ FG FLOW LINE .................. FL CATCH BASIN ................ CB BOTTOM OF BASIN ............. BOT BOTTOM OF BASIN ............. BOT INVERT OF PIPE .............. INV WATER METER . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . WM —❑ SEWER LATERAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SL PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT...... ------ EXISTING SEWER LINE ..... . EXISTING WATER LINE ..... . BLOCK WALL........... rz— --I EXISTING .......... ...... ( ) EXISTING FENCE LINE .......... X x x IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT AIAP 368117 BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.M. C ------ - TRACT BOUNDARY uo ---- & PROPOSED R/W - PROPOSED ^ T PROPOSEI Tl_�(OPEN i.BASIN DIP WAl SPACE) (O�iv SPACE) PROPOSED CATCH BASIN PROPOSED MAXWELL E LOT 1 466, 10,200 SF 3:1 PE 64.7 TYP PROPOSED BUILDING SETBACK LINES (TYP) PROPOSED BLOCK WALL EXISTING BLOCK WALL PROPOSED BLOCK RETAINING WALL SHEET 1: COVER SHEET & ENTRY DETAIL SHEET 2: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP & GRADING PLAN SHEET 3: EASEMENT DETAIL SHEET EXISTINGII' 3 11 CONCRET ; SIDEWAL ; I III "'- SCALE 1 "=20' ``' x 462.6 0 �.+' 1�1. ! \ O x0462.3 R/W VARIES 50'-65' R/W VARIES 9' 32' 9'-24' C L PUE/LANDSCAPEI 10' PUE 16' / 16' ,I I II PROPOSED AC PAVEMENT ' IL 2% —� _2% 7�, r2q _---- 2� MIN. II _-------- ---- --------- ---- illiill�li - II�Ilillllliillllilllllillll n------- Illllilllllill� PROPOSED 6" CURB & GI (UTTER =I I 1 LOT "A"- PRIVATE STREET NTS NOTE PARKING IS RESTRICTED TO ONE SIDE OF STREET. R/W R/W 108' PROPOSED A PAVEMENT 15' 78' 15' , 5' VAR. 39' C 1 39' IN. MATCH EXIST. AC —� _ 2% VARIES —� ---------- --� 1 _ --------------- ( I I I=III=n1=111-1 I I I i I I I i i l l f 151 PROPOSED 6" CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED PC CONCRETE SIDEWALK MONROE STREET NTS x461., !P/L & TRACT BOUNDARY I 4C�1�ff11]40 4G�aC�4 �t]LQp �� � � � � f4G3LaC�4 [1V1Lap �3�7��� LLAr�� �g [D9 ng �-vB EXISTING CONCRETE BLOCK COMBINATION I RO-0� 9 230-0 RETAINING / GARDEN WALL I COLOR & FINISH PER ARCH'S SPEC'S ' (TW) AS NOTED F/L I I /p/Al PE AS NOTED EXISTING NATURAL GRADE (TRW) AS NOTED (PE) AS NOTED -III=III- (TF) AS NOTED ;III; TYPICAL SECTION SOUTH BOUNDARY LINE rP�.d NTS VICINITY MAP N.T.S. SITE IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 368117 BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.M. LZI OBS, .09TC .39FL k- x4 4 % Ix4 J ', OBS, A F I; x4 ; ING CONC. BLOCK --__WALL TO REMAIN OBS, 7, ',;I x 467, l I x 46 II O I TING ONC. BLOCK EXISTING CONC. BLOCK i A L TO REMAIN WALL TO REMAIN i t I •1 1 1 x 466.6 EXISTING CONC. BLOCK WALL TO REMAIN 1 i OBS, x 467,4 x 7, I \ i EXISTING CONC. BLOCK WALL TO REMAIN OBJ, I x , - Lp► O 0=06'5 _ (` OPEN SPACE I A=14'1 0� 0 PRIVA ACCESS- R `^'' , - 00 \ = _ _ _ 0=1 ; 513 \ `` 30,447 SF WITHIN PRIVATE R/W \ 4=14'10'34" R=950.00' 0 ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS - ,� \ ` L=122.15 R= 000.00' I R=966.00' L=235.05' - - ALIGNED WITH EXISTING __ _ - O BASIS OF BEARING L=239 01' DRIVEWAY a 4503- 468.53fS° N89'55'00"E __180_34' 0.5% HP EX. FENCE--R=109.00' I� x 46717 1`. I II �J OBS, I I f I I Il ;1' 1/ L I I O S• / i l l i l �� 46 98TC ° 7771= �o 0 I I i' Iitl J I 464. L 0 0 00 1 o x 1 I III � ;''`. 464.99TC 464.29FL 1 ^<: -y I �x�O6.3 I I I\ � I I \ / I I I I ' I x 46 III I I` \ \ \ �\ 0 / /� i Or I I I I 64.76TC �I � i i i i I I 64.03FL IG' CONC. BLOCK I I I /°° E)�'F -RE WALL TO REMAIN n I EXISTING CONC. BL02r WALL TO _ Er �j x 4 j' iIiii I 4 3.9 C I G \ I I II 0 \II I v x 46 OPOSED i! I I O 4 4.02FL I `J w I47BS,I 0 DA RAMP i I T= 6'59 56 II L-245.86 O N89'55'00"E 1318.07' -\ 1016.00' / 5 6 4 RC� EA5EMENT (N89'55'00"E 131i8.07,' A " 124.11' 1218.01' S i N89°55 00"E 1219. 1 s - 4�7. ° 209'39'31" L=56.42' R=38.00' _ R=975.00' LL=139.05' _ N89°55'00"E r f \ /d=29*39'31" 55.69' 1I 1 A=06'59'56" �j �/ R 100.00' R=984.00' `' L=51.76' N89°55'00"E L= '220.22' 64.15' M L- _ �o N60°15'29"E N60°15'29"E T � 15.00 Z 50.00' 50.00' 89°55'00'E I� 1 R=470=22°16.00' '23" LOT 10 8.46 LOT 9 l� / 0=95'24'56' M o=18.27' 11800 SF 10200 SF �o R=47.00' N L=78.27' z 14000 SF CDPE=69.4 PE=68.9J/ 0 PE=68.6 � Z T=468.60 I QP SPACE OT=465.60 I- Io�PRUPOSED--6' =CK-MLL J S1 0=466.47 MAX 7 I - TW 74.50 I TF 67.50 49.02' 118.62' _ 88.82' 4(TW-�72 67) 1 EXISTING 6' BLOCK WALL-0" 4 (TF 66.00) I\LT�L74.90 TW 74.90 TW74.90 TWTW 14.90TRW 69.57) TRW 69.57) TRY (TRW 69.57) I (TRW 69.57) 1 TF 66.23) �TF 66.23) I �TF ( EXISTING'8" IRR. MbIN TF 66.90) 1 TF 66.86) LOT F 6 . WIT 16 �� L07 177 PE=(69. 5 PE=(69.73) PE=(89.63) I apt 770�� o C�0�0� 0 I ap�171C�71� o C�0�0� C� I apt 71T077� s C�0�0� EASEMENT NOTES: A2 EASEMENT GRANTED TO PAISLEY CORPORATION FOR STREETS, ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1966 AS DOC. NO. 110958 OFFICIAL RECORDS EASEMENT GRANTED TO DAVID L. ARMSTRONG FOR WATER PIPELINES, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1957 IN BOOK 2146, PAGE 505 OFFICIAL RECORDS (NOTE: THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF 5 SAID EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD) AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE AN EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF SAID LAND FOR IN x 5 FAVOR OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES, INCLUDING PUBLIC UTILITY I AND PUBLIC SERVICE USES, RECORDED NOVEMBER 06, 1972 AS DOC. NO. 147986, OFFICIAL RECORDS EASEMENT GRANTED TO PAISLEY CORPORATION FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND ROAD PURPOSES I RECORDED NOVEMBER 23, 1972 AS DOC. NO. 157027, OFFICIAL RECORDS. * EASEMENT RESERVED BY DAN P. WHITENER AND ALMA P. WHITENER, HUSBAND AND WIFE AND ELMER DOUGLAS WHITENER AND SHIRLEY A. WHITENER, HUSBAND AND WIFE FOR AN IRRIGATION PIPE LINE THAT MAY EXIST FOR BRINGING WATER FROM THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED AUGUST 30, 1974 AS DOC. N0. 112254, OFFICIAL RECORDS. (THE EXACT LOCATION I** AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD) L _ x 466.6 I I x 468.3 I I � x •0 Q�'\- Jr-_ - , 1 46 .59TC I I I 0=91.47'07" ; I �=0�'01'3� \ n\06'48'25"-(2=35.00' � 05'13" ,=01'41'16" I, =1 0.00' /1=06'59'56" R=34. ---- L=245.86' _---___----- L=118.80' L=120.70' R-984.00' _ 64.19 I 6. 31,, =1 0' 1,=56.07' 703'3 6' OCK WALL AT C _BOUNDS R 98400' - - -- ---- TW 70.50 L=120.20' (NO2'0359"W)D2 r \` 11 4r rr T II -{ L=241.93 01�5, TF 65.00 64.19 )D2 5 .03' B619F�--------------- I�sr _ 8 -- -- s - - - �i�----1.12% N89°5 7�F4 3.8� - - aR5 _ 4- - o non 4 rn uie, �! " --P��,�T€�- fN ° - _ -- - - - - - - I - - - �_ 464 ,/ I -I-- r- � PROPOSED � �.,. � -7 46 ':,•�\ 46 �....� -� �-- PROPOSED SEW R MAIN _� : _ _ - - _ _ _ - PR' D SEWER MA�7 R 6:00; PR OSED 6" CURB & UTTER 4 77 5 0=14'10'34 ��-�- � __ - � _ ,. , SEWER LA - � \\ � R=6.00 23°24'41 " -02°31'55" _ R=934.00' f 1 T. (TYP.) =05'2645" - -- - EXISTING 18" IRR. MAIN _ L=231.01' I I I 1 W MEETRER ENP 0=14'05'13" v��-R=1025.00' O a-� R=1025.00' N} cn L=45.30' r A=02°11'30" I I R=1016.00' �Co L=97.42'� F-m I 0=06° 17' 18" I I, O �_ L-249.80' m =05'03'05' w 0=03°04'20" R=925.00' i O _ - 0=05°33'51" �- I- R=925.00 R=925.00' L=35.38' ,- I a F 4=35'54'50" (R=975.00 a=14'05'13" 4=05°39'23" I 0=05'40'02" -I LOT 5 L=101.52' � I I o 4=02°37'26" A=02'58'26 � R=16.00' L=85.96' M R=1025.00' p o L=49.60' 1 R=1025.00' , rn 1016.00' R=1025.00' NI c i co L=99.54' xF "�I 10200 SF I ItNS. pT I _ R=925.00' R=1025.00' L=5.15' 0 0 PE=66.9 1 '4 LOT 4 1100 I L=42.36' L=53.20' < 466, L=101.38' 5'TYP. PROPOSED STORM DRAIN A=00'20'04° o o �L=249.79' L=101.19' o� 9 , WW , R=1025.00' o �% c.l �N I o �i 'Z L o ' LOT 3 o PROPOSED MAX WELLLOT 8 L=5 98' �� LOT 7 LOT 6 D 0� 11600 S II l� T. 6 o 10200 SF R�� 4 g6I� I I� 1 `�' 10200 SF � TW 70.5 10200 SF `� o PE=66.4 0 \\\ n 10200 SF PE=67.4 n o d o II o 10200 SF �n LOT 1 TF 623.00 0 0 �\ `� Z 11��11 Z PE=65.7 I �I PE=65.2 I g1 10200 SF PE=68.4 I of PE=67.9 0 ��D �` `�� I NI 3:1 MAX TYP I o, N I- J I Z z n �1� D 1�15� I 01 PROPOSED 6' BLOCK WALL--r i 10�1 �I PROPOSED 6' BLOCK WALL o I ZI PE=64.7 m -J "'T� �- �� 1�1 , 1 `,- J Z� I I �I 1ino1 1 �, 7 - - -- Z� -- ~ m PROPOSED 6' BLOCK WALL -- _ I •, 13m1 I I`L__�. 91.61' 99.27' 101. ' 94.42' 101.46' \ 95.08'� 32' 98.74' r�lti r N89'S5'00"E 1273.0 N89'S5'00"E 1273.06') R1 1243.04 - - - - - - - - - 3.57 TW 73.57 TW 73.57 TW 73.57 TW 72.90 TW 72.90 TW 72.90 TW 72.23 x 4 TW 72.23 TW 71.57 TW 71.57 TW 71. 68.23) TRW 68.23) I TRW 68.23) I TRW 68.23 I TRW 66.90) TRW 66.90) I TF 65.57 (TF 64.90) I (TF 64.90) I (TF 64.23) (TF 64.23) I (TF 64., 6.23) 9TF 66.23) I �TF 66.23) I �TF 66.23) (TF 65.57) �TFF 65.57j L07 22 LOT 2�3 LOT 2,4 x 4675 I (TF 65,57) L07 �300 L07 �31 LOT 30 4 9 LOT' �377 PE=(67.83) PE=(67.93) PE=(67.93) �0� 2�o PE=(66.43) PE=(66.33) PE=(65.53) PE=(85.73) %PH 77677- o 60-022 APK 7767 - o 60-02�3 APN 77077- o 60-02,4 PE=(88.33) AM 7 67 - o 60-0�30 apt 71077� o C�0�0�3� AP 770�� o C�0�0�3C� I LQpm 77(377- o 60-0377 EXISTING CONC. BLOCK COMBINATIO GARDEN & RETAINING WALL TO RE AIN NOTE 0ADDED I 2 I O . ° � 3, TO ALL ELEVAT ONS ON �, O o� D 0� RING IT ROM TRACT 2742 T, x 4678 O x 4 59 NAV 29 TO AV O \ x 465,3 x 463.5 � � _ V SCALE 1"_ o AREA TABU ATIO Know what's la@IOW_ Call before you dig- x 465,3 TOTAL AREA=203,385 .67 AC) LANDSCAPE (MONROE ST. T B)=2,946 TOTAL PRIATE STREET R/ (LOT A)=/7p843 SF TOTAL PUB IC R/W DEDICA N (LOT -2429 SF J TOTAL OPE4 SPACES AREA TS A) BC, D, & E=50,8251, SF, 25. (LOT "A -D N SPACE PORTI S INCLU, ES ONLY THE OPEN SPAC] BETWEEN THE BACK OF CUR & R/W AND THE ENTRY ISLANDS) v4�TOTAL RESIDENTIAL LUT< AREAS=104,78 SF, 1 � I I II I I I I N49.28 4"W 41.5'�7/! N43°42'0 '"Wo 31 32.25' 00, z �I N8756' "E MI ih 2N8T5601'� of (25.00')D2 1Z1 I z PROPOSED ` l \yam 13 67 SF 3 5' CONC ' ��=78°22'54° OS 00 SIDEWALK I .A LOT C.4 R=36.50' I' ) ° ;M 464.2 FS) 3311 SF 3' RETENTION BAST M OPEN SPACE z WS100=462.gg BOT=458.00 �� 30 ec--- 55 0 39' 6c--•--63 I I ----1-1-3e - --s4 3:1 MAX TYP FG 65.0 � � N89'55'00"E I I �' 30.65' 71 57 R/W D DICATI N xl JI I (TF 64.23) 2f 29 SF I jl 004 LOOT30 m ; I A PE=(65.73) x 0 I -°I apt 77071� o C�0�0�3 � I � �I 'ICI 63.94i EXISTING CONC. BLOCK WALL TO REMAIN D I o DI o I4 I I I I C/L, SECTION LINE & CITY LIMIT 1 20' 55' I I I II N 6 5 x ,9 16 9 I 4� i PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: SEAL IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA Q�OFESS/p4, ssi \PR sygI/x F77.540 SPRINGFIELD LANE, SUITE "C" ESFANDIAR SHAHANDEH DATE: - PALM DESERT, CA 9221 1 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 RCE N0. 47834 cJ v, No. 47834 = m LIJ rn NGINEERING (760)77284000FFICE BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER APPROVED BY: c (760) 772-8421 FAX `ST,9�F CIV\\- ����Q CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING -PLANNING -SURVEYING OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.M. DATE: OF CAS\ DWG No. TPM174002 SHEET 2 OF 3 rn Alm m 7Cs7- T— be LO 0 �i M 0 1 CV Z LOT 10 11800 SF LOT E 4000 SF II TRACT BOUNDARY SCALE 1d=40' 0 20 40 80 120 L07 7 Lapp] 7C�7�4� o Oo �Oo Oo 7 PROPOSED 16' ACCESS EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER APN 767-580-013. EASEMENT IS FOR A DRIVEWAY 8.50' PUE — — PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER APN 767-580-013. EASEMENT IS BLANKET IN NATURE OVER LOT "A" PAVED AREA LOT 0 LapH 767=40 00 =00 00 0 L07 15 1 LOT 16 Lapp] Lapp] I I I I TRACT BOUNDARY IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.M. CD 7RACY Roc 267,69 M[R 23514041 L�OO LOT A LOT 3L07 2 L07 1 L07 Lap[ 7674 0 0=00�3 APH 77677-4 o Oo - Oo 2 Lapp] 77677-4 0 0- 00001 �, p�1 7C�7=40 0=005 apt 7C�7�� 0 0�004� OPEN SPACE r 30,447 SF WITHIN PRIVATE R/W N89'55'00"E 1318.07' 40' ROAD EASEMENT (N89'55'00"E 1318.07')R1 1218.01' rn � - -� 0 PRIVATE ST LOT A (OPEN SPACE) --_-__-- - -- - ------ - —--� ------ - - -- - -- ------ -- ---- — ----- - - - — _ _-- ----------- _ — — — — — 5 w d o PROPOSED R/W LO lv N8756'22" QJ � 25.00' LOT 5 —% N8 LOT D T56'01")D 10200 SF �� �25.00D2B 4000 SF L3067 SF OPEN SPACE LOT C /A2- LOT 8 LOT 7 LOT 6 /A999 LOT 4 11600 SF LOT 3 LOT 2 9311 SF os LOT 9 10200 SF 10200 SF 10200 SF D 1 O 10200 SF 10200 SF LOT 1 RETENTION BASIN (OS) I 10200 SF �OR�E 4gg,65 10200 SF OPEN SPACE � 2 ANC 2R ME 24' AS 1� TRACT' BOUNDARY I LOOT 17 Lapp] 767- o 60-017 LOT 22 Lapp] 767= o 60-022 EXSITING EASEMENT NOTES: ZLEASEMENT GRANTED TO PAISLEY CORPORATION FOR STREETS, ROADS OR HIGHWAYS, RECORDED NOVEMBER 15, 1966 AS DOC. NO. 110958 OFFICIAL RECORDS EASEMENT GRANTED TO DAVID L. ARMSTRONG FOR WATER PIPELINES, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 12, 1957 IN BOOK 2146, PAGE 505 OFFICIAL RECORDS (NOTE: THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD) AN IRREVOCABLE OFFER TO DEDICATE AN EASEMENT OVER A PORTION OF SAID LAND FOR IN A FAVOR OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR PUBLIC ROAD PURPOSES, INCLUDING PUBLIC UTILITY AND PUBLIC SERVICE USES, RECORDED NOVEMBER 06, 1972 AS DOC. NO. 147986, OFFICIAL RECORDS A EASEMENT GRANTED TO PAISLEY CORPORATION FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND ROAD PURPOSES RECORDED NOVEMBER 23, 1972 AS DOC. NO. 157027, OFFICIAL RECORDS. EASEMENT RESERVED BY DAN P. WHITENER AND ALMA P. WHITENER, HUSBAND AND WIFE AND ELMER DOUGLAS WHITENER AND SHIRLEY A. WHITENER, HUSBAND AND WIFE FOR AN IRRIGATION PIPE LINE THAT MAY EXIST FOR BRINGING WATER FROM THE COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, RECORDED AUGUST 30, 1974 AS DOC. NO. 112254, OFFICIAL RECORDS. (THE EXACT LOCATION AND EXTENT OF SAID EASEMENT IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD) N891�5'00"E 1273.06' (N89'55'00"E 1273.06')R1 LOT F - R/W DEDICATION 2,429 SF L07 23 1 L07 24 1 L07 20 1 L07 30 I L07 31 1 L07 30 1 LOT 37 1 L07 36 Lap�1 767- o 60=02 3 LapH 767- o 60-02C Lapp] 767= oCEO-029 APH 767- o 60-030 Lapel 767- a (50-031 APH 767= o 60-036 Lapp] 767- o 60-037 APH 767- o 60-03 0 I I AMENDED I I I I I I I TNIA�7 NO, 32742 1 I I I I LED) O �D0 �0� Know what's IJ@l®W_ CE1II before yoga dig. PREPARED UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: ESFANDIAR SHAHANDEH RCE NO. 47834 APPROVED BY: DATE: SEAL QROFESS/ON AR � � o W No. 47834 = m S'T CIV\� �TF OF CNO E ssl ENGINEERING IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 77 540 SPRINGFILANE, SUITE "C" PALMM DESERT, CA 9221 1 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 36817 D (760)772-8400OFFICE BEING A PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (760) 772-8421 FAX CIVIL AND STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING - PLANNING - SURVEYING U)x D �o ro cm rm z;u -� m 0 0 wo 00 h (o J N z 0 N 0 w (A 0 1 30' OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 15, DWG No. TPM174003 TOWNSHIP 6 SOUTH, RANGE 7 EAST, S.B.M. I SHEET 3 OF 3 DATE: ATTACHMENT 4 ORDINANCE NO. 440 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.30.030 AND ADDING CHAPTER 9.50.100, OF TITLE 9, "PLANNING," PERTAINING TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE SOUTHEAST POLICY AREA ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT 2006-086 WHEREAS, vacant lots of 10 acres or less in the southeastern portion of the City (south of Avenue 52) proposed for subdivision present specific development challenges; and WHERES, the southeastern portion of the City abuts more rural, less dense development in the unincorporated portion of the County of Riverside; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to encourage well designed, low density residential subdivisions on lots of 10 acres or less, which are compatible with surrounding development; and WHEREAS, Section 9.30,030 enables the City to establish alternate development standards to address issues specific to a particular land use category in a particular area of the City; and WHEREAS, additional standards are required to ensure high quality development on lots of 10 acres or less which will be subdivided in the future; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission considered the staff report and all information, evidence and testimony provided at the April 24 and May 8 meetings on the proposed text amendments, ultimately moving to unanimously recommend City Council approval; and WHEREAS, the City Council has given careful consideration to the staff report and all of the information, evidence and testimony presented at a public hearing on the proposed Ordinance held on June 19, 2007; and WHEREAS, an Initial Study was prepared to consider the zoning text amendments relating to development standards for lands south of Avenue 52, and the City determined that the proposed text amendments would not have a significant environmental impact as described in the California Environmental Quality Act, and a Negative Declaration was prepared. Ordinance No. 440 Zoning Text Amendment 2006-086 Adopted: July 3, 2007 Page 2 THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 9.30.030 of the La Quinta Municipal Code is amended to read as follows: 9.30.030 RL low density residential district. A. Purpose. To provide for the development and preservation of low density neighborhoods (two to four units per acre) with one- and two-story single-family detached dwellings on large or medium size lots and/or, subject to a specific plan, projects with clustered smaller dwellings, such as one- and two-story single-family attached, townhome or condominium dwellings, with generous open space. B. Permitted Uses. Chapter 9.40 lists permitted land uses. C. Development Standards. Minimum lot size 7200 sq. ft.' Minimum lot frontage 60 ft. Maximum structure height 28 ft. Maximum number of stories 2 Minimum front yard setback (non -garage portions of dwelling) 20 ft.2 Minimum garage setback 25 ft.3 Minimum interior/exterior side yard setbacks 5/10 ft.4 Minimum rear yard setback 10 ft. for existing recorded lots and 20 ft. for new lots Maximum lot coverage 50% Minimum livable floor area excluding garage 1400 sq. ft. Minimum landscape setbacks adjacent to perimeter streets 10' minimum at any point, 20' minimum average over entire frontage ' A minimum lot size of 20,000 sq. ft. shall be required of new lots created within subdivisions of 10 acres or less in size as further described in Section 9.50.100. 2 Projects with five or more adjacent dwelling units facing the same street shall incorporate front setbacks varying between 20 feet and 25 feet plus in order to avoid streetscape monotony. Ordinance No. 440 Zoning Text Amendment 2006-086 Adopted: July 3, 2007 Page 3 3 Twenty feet if "roll -up" type garage door is used. " For interior setbacks, if the building is over 17 feet in height, the setback is five feet plus one foot for every foot over 17 feet in height or fraction thereof, to a maximum setback of ten feet. The additional setback may be provided entirely at grade level or a combination of at grade and airspace above the 17-foot building. SECTION 2. Section 9.50.100 is added to the Municipal Code, as follows: 9.50.100 RL district property subdivision development standards, 10 acres or less, located south of Avenue 52. A. Applicability. The following development standards shall apply to all subdivisions less than 10 acres in size located in the RL district, south of Avenue 52, and west of Monroe. B. Development Standards. 1. A minimum lot size of 20,000 square feet shall be required, unless: a. The proposed subdivision establishes a minimum of 25% common area open space (exclusive of individual residential lots). Said open space shall include amenities and features such as passive open space, trails, play areas or equipment, picnic facilities, recreational amenities, clubhouse facilities and/or active use parks. Retention basins may be considered as part of the 25% open space requirement provided they are designed as an integral part of the project, fully landscaped, and accessible for passive and active use b. The minimum lot size within the proposed subdivision is equal to or greater than the minimum lot size of the residential lots within the abutting subdivided properties created prior to August 2, 2007. c. Driveway access should be consolidated with other neighboring properties. 2. Under no circumstances shall lots be less than 10,000 square feet in size. 3. A landscaped parkway of 30 feet in depth shall be required on all public streets. 4. All other development standards of the RL District, including but not limited to setbacks, building height and parking requirements, shall apply. C. Official Zoning Map. The City's Official Zoning Map shall identify as an overlay all properties potentially affected by these provisions. Ordinance No. 440 Zoning Text Amendment 2006-086 Adopted: July 3, 2007 Page 4 SECTION 3. ENVIRONMENTAL. The Community Development Department has determined that the Amendments to the Municipal Code will not have a significant impact on the environment, and a Negative Declaration is adopted. SECTION 4. SEVERABILITY. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be severable, and if any clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part of this Ordinance shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remainder thereof, but shall be confined in its operation to the clause, sentence, paragraph, subdivision, section, or part thereof directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered. SECTION 5. LEGAL CONSTRUCTION. The provisions of this Ordinance shall be construed as necessary to effectively carry out its purposes, which are hereby found and declared to be in furtherance of the public health, safety and welfare. SECTION 6. All Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are hereby superseded by this Ordinance to the extent they are inconsistent with this Ordinance. SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take full force and effect and be in force 30 days after passage. SECTION 8. PUBLICATION. The City Clerk is directed to publish this Ordinance in the manner and in the time required by law. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 3rd day of July, 2007, by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Henderson, Kirk, Osborne, Sniff, Mayor Adolph NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None DON ADOLP , Mayo City of La Quinta, California Ordinance No. 440 Zoning Text Amendment 2006-086 Adopted: July 3. 2007 Page 5 ATTEST: erk City of La Quipda, California (SEAL) APPROVED AS TO FORM: M. KATHERINE JENJSQN, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California Ordinance No. 440 Zoning Text Amendment 2006-086 Adopted: July 3, 2007 Page 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) ss. CITY OF LA QUINTA ) I, VERONICA J. MONTECINO, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true, and correct copy of Ordinance No. 440 which was introduced at a regular meeting on the -.19" day of June, 2007, and was adopted at a regular meeting held on the 3`d day -of July, 2007, not being less than 5 days after the date of introduction thereof. I further certify that the foregoing Ordinance was posted in three places within the City of VQuinta as specified in City Council Resolution 2006-102. City of La Quinta, California DECLARATION OF POSTING I, VERONICA J. MONTECINO, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby c rtify that the foregoing ordinance was posted on July 131", 2007, pursua to Council solution/ VERONICA J. ONTECINO, CMC, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California ATTACHMENT 5 City of La Quinta- Planning Commission 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Draft Conditions of Approval and Planning Commission Hearing for TTM #36817 Dear Commissioner, I would like to thank the Staff and City Attorney for their efforts in reaching some common ground between the Applicant and myself Even though we never had any formal or informal attempt by the Applicant to discuss their proposed plan, we do appreciate the City staff for making attempts for the Applicant to contact us. I believe the Estates of La Quinta would agree when I say that the Applicant has given little effort to discuss their proposed plan with the surrounding neighbors and their concerns- very inconsistent with most reputable developers, which raises great concern for the projects ability to make it to the finish line (a fully improved development). With that said, we have our own concerns with the project, which I would like to briefly describe below. I plan to discuss these at the planning commission hearing and appreciate any questions or comments regarding our concerns then: 1. Lot Size- Not consistent or close in comparison to Estates of La Quinta or our ranch property. We requested lot sizes that at minimum match the lot sizes of Monterra that these lots face (14,000sf lots). 2. Open Space Requirement- We feel the "Open Space" being accounted for on the plan is not an accurate percentage needed and that the areas being called "Open Space" are truly not Open Space as was intended by the legal description for such a requirement. 3. We requested the Iots be spaced with an Open Space between clusters of the proposed lots. There was only one space provided. 4. A proposed housing product that will be built has never been provided. The Applicant says "Custom Lots", but we all know that custom lots are not sold on 10,000sf or less lots. This is a classic entitle and flip project, which based on the unique circumstances, would create irreparable damage to the adjacent property owners and leave yet another project vacant and not completed for years to come that was approved by the City. We firmly request that a full understanding of the real product be proposed for review and approval. They should go through the process of design review. We feel this needs to be provided before any submission, review, and approval of improvement plans is granted. 5. The land in the area was originally intended to be larger lots, clearly defined by our ranch and the Estates of La Quinta. We built and created our residence, which, has been established now for 10 years. Monterra made sense to annex into PGA West, but this property was left out of that Map. A squeezed in random cluster of 11 tract homes in between Monterra and Estates of La Quinta will be a financial burden for all homeowners in the area. 6. If the applicant were able to move forward with the proposed map, we request that a very solid schedule and duration for the improvements be required and all improvements be completed concurrently in the time frame that is reasonable. The best option is to not allow any alteration of the property to take place until a Final Map is approved and the Subdivision Improvement Agreement, along with the Improvement Bond for the entire property is recorded. This alleviates the concern we have for living with a half complete project for several years should the Applicant become unstable and not properly funded to complete the project in its entirety. We request this based on the special circumstance that we only have one access to our property with an excessively long access easement. Fire/Safety Concerns- Who will monitor and check the temporary road when it is constructed to ensure that we are able to get any needed public support in case of an emergency? We feel this is also why item #6 above is so important if the Applicant is unable to complete the work, we are forced to lean on the City to file a claim with the bonding company, prior to getting the road complete. We would prefer for that Bond to incorporate ALL improvements so the neighbors in Monterra, as well as Estates of La Quinta can have a completed project, within the 1-year, which is the allotted time frame based on the Subdivision Improvement Agreement as described by the Engineering and Planning Department. 8. Parking- the proposed Map has a private street that we were told, would not allow for any street parking. I would like clarification on this. I am sure other items will come up at the hearing and I am looking forward to reviewing our concerns with you and hope to reach common ground so the Applicant has the ability to quickly and properly provide a new plan for the property that works for the immediate surround community. Thank you again for taking the time to read this letter. Sincerely, Roy Ziegler 55075 Monroe Street La Quinta, CA 92253 949-636-3492 royaziegler@gmail.com ATTACHMENT 6 Jay Wuu From: Tom Brohard <tbrohard@earthlink.net> Sent: Friday, May 06, 2016 4:36 PM To: Jay Wuu Cc: Larryo4968@aol.com; bniknam@centurylink.net; Tim Jonasson Subject: Objections to Proposed Tentative Tract Map 36817 Attachments: Estates at La Q Letters - TTM 36817.pdf; TTM 36817 Area Mapjpg Jay — Attached are letters signed by 12 of the 14 property owners in the Estates at La Quinta, the 20-year old development immediately north of proposed Tentative Tract Map 36817. We have shown the addresses of our residents in red on the attached Google Earth photograph. Each of our homeowners strongly objects to the proposed project to shoehorn 10 10,000 square foot lots into the 150' wide strip of land between our back walls and the Monterra Project now under construction at PGA West. Each of our 14 lots are 1.25 acres (55,600 square feet), five times the size of the TTM 36817 lots. No one in our community supports TTM 36817, an incompatible project that is misplaced and immediately adjacent to us. We have tried on several occasions to discuss our concerns with the developer and his engineers. On September 1, 2015 the developer no -showed a meeting at City Hall to discuss our issues. On March 17, 2016, we attended a meeting with you at City Hall and asked a number of pointed questions of the developer and were promised responses. We have left voicemail messages on April 5 and April 8, but our calls have not been returned and there has been no further direct discussion of our issues and concerns. We are extremely frustrated at the attitude of the proponents who believe they can avoid addressing our issues and concerns. We respectfully request that the following conditions be imposed by the City on the developer of TTM 36817: 1) Raise the height of the existing 5' 6" block wall between TTM 36817 and the Estates at La Quinta to at least 6' 6" at no cost to us. Paint the north side of the wall to match existing color within the backyards at the Estates at La Quinta. 2) Plant and maintain a landscaped buffer along the south side of our common wall. Buffer to be irrigated, trimmed and maintained at 10' to 12' high in perpetuity by the project. High density landscaped buffer to be planted at the conclusion of the grading with 36" box plants to be approved by Estates at La Quinta HOA. 3) Only single story homes will be permitted in TTM 36817. The maximum height shall be 20' from concrete pad to highest point of the roof/architectural feature. Pad elevations in TTM 36817 must be lower than those in the Estates at La Quinta. 4) Relocate all existing date palm trees to buffer area between road and Estates at La Quinta. Guarantee relocation of date palms or replace in kind. 5) Estates at La Quinta to have right to approve/disapprove architectural guidelines for future construction of each home in TTM 36817. Please add our letters and requested conditions to your staff report to the Planning Commission for their upcoming meeting. Thank you for your consideration. Tom Brohard, President Board of Directors Estates at La Quinta (760) 398-8885 April 14, 2016 City Of La Quinta Community Development Department- Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: City of La Quinta Planning Commission RE: Proposed Tract Map #36817 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is concerning a proposed tract map that has direct and indirect consequences to our property located at We have been informed of the proposed tract map and are deeply concerned with the impacts this proposed map will have on our property, investment, daily life, and the overall surrounding area. The following are a few of our concerns, in which we are requesting the Planning Commission to take into special consideration when determining the approval or disapproval of the proposed tract map: 1. The proposed tract map is on a 150' wide piece of land. The applicant is proposing ten 10,000 square foot lots, much smaller than our 1.25 acre lots (54,450 square feet), directly behind our backyards. These additional lots are squeezed between us at the Estates at La Quinta and Monterra to the South, creating a very congested setting. 2. We built and established our community with the anticipation that the immediate surrounding properties would remain rural equestrian with larger lot configurations to maintain our quiet and tranquil environment. The proposed tract directly contradicts these goals, 3. The noise and traffic that will be created, directly behind our backyards, is going to take away from our peaceful environment, which we have enjoyed for many years before this proposed project was planned. This proposed plan negatively impacts the environment that we have already established. 4. The 5.5' wall height between our property and the proposed project is a safety concern to us. There are minimal activities currently on the property. With pedestrians and cars that will be directly behind our yards, we have concerns over security and safety, which the applicant does not plan to address in his construction efforts. S. This project will directly affect our views and landscape. There are well -established palm trees and landscape, provided by the owners at the ranch on their existing driveway. The applicant plans on removing much of this established landscape, which we have indirectly used for protection and enjoyed. The removal of this landscape and the low wall will open our backyards to the new proposed street and future homes, making us vulnerable. While this project may be within the current zoning regulations, it is not consistent with the zoning in which our community was formed over 20 years ago when the area was rural equestrian and 1.25 acre lots. We have established ourselves here under the impression that we would not be directly impacted with long-term growth, especially right in our backyards. While a second development is now being proposed just north of the Estates at La Quinta, that developer has met and worked with us to address and mitigate our concerns and issues. To the contrary, the developer of the proposed project to the south has a dismal communication and cooperation record with us, having no -showed a joint meeting scheduled by the City last September and more recently failing to respond at all to our issues expressed directly to the developer at our March 17 meeting at City Hall and subsequently in voicemails to the developer and his representative. I formally request for the planning commission to not approve this proposed map. I understand the applicant has a right to develop his property, and I am not opposed to a future map that provides less density and creates an environment that is consistent with our community. We know it is common for applicants to try to pass projects in the summer when many homeowners are not in town. Due to the many consequential factors of this proposed project, we formally request that any Planning Commission hearing be postponed to the fall, when a majority of our homeowners are back in town and have a better opportunity to be present at any meeting. Sincerely, �[ 1C� � } 1 Name; Signature: April 14, 2016 City Of La Quinta Community Development Department- Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quints, CA 92253 Attention: City of La Quinta Planning Commission RE: Proposed Tract Map #36817 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is concerning a proposed tract map that has direct and indirect consequences to our property located at 81965 Mountain View Lane, La Quinta, CA, 92253. We have been informed of the proposed tract map and are deeply concerned with the impacts this proposed map will have on our property, investment daily life, and the overall surrounding area. The following are a few of our concerns, in which we are requesting the Planning Commission to take into special consideration when determining the approval or disapproval of the proposed tract map: 1. The proposed tract map is on a 150' wide piece of land. The applicant is proposing ten 10,000 square foot lots, much smaller than our 1.25 acre lots (54,450 square feet), directly behind our backyards. These additional lots are squeezed between us at the Estates at La Quinta and Monterra to the South, creating a very congested setting. 2. We built and established our community with the anticipation that the immediate surrounding properties would remain rural equestrian with larger lot configurations to maintain our quiet and tranquil environment. The proposed tract directly contradicts these goals. 3. The noise and traffic that will be created, directly behind our backyards, is going to take away from our peaceful environment which we have enjoyed for many years before this proposed project was planned. This proposed plan negatively impacts the environment that we have already established. 4. The 5.5' wall height between our property and the proposed project is a safety concern to us. There are minimal activities currently on the property. With pedestrians and cars that will be directly behind our yards, we have concerns over security and safety, which the applicant does not plan to address in his construction efforts. 5. This project will directly affect our views and landscape. There are well -established palm trees and landscape, provided by the owners at the ranch on their existing driveway. The applicant plans on removing much of this established landscape, which we have indirectly used for protection and enjoyed. Theremoval of this landscape and the low wall will open our backyards to the new proposed street and future homes, making us vulnerable. While this project may be within the current zoning regulations, it is not consistentwith the zoning in which our community was formed over 20 years ago when the area was rural equestrian and 1.25 acre lots. We have established ourselves here under the impression that we would not be directly impacted with long-term growth, especially right in our backyards. While a second development is now being proposed just north of the Estates at La Quinta, that developer has met and worked with us to address and mitigate our concerns and issues. To the contrary, the developer of the proposed project to the south has a dismal communication and cooperation record with us, having no -showed a joint meeting scheduled by the City last September and more recently failing to respond at all to our issues expressed directly to the developer at our March 17 meeting at City Hall and subsequently in voicemails to the developer and his representative. I formally request for the planning commission to not approve this proposed map. I understand the applicant has a right to develop his property, and I am not opposed to a future map that provides less density and creates an environment that is consistent with our community. We know it is common for applicants to try to pass projects in the summer when many homeowners are not in town. Due to the many consequential factors of this proposed project we formally request that any Planning Commission hearing be postponed to the fall, when a majority of our homeowners are back in town and have a better opportunity to be present at any meeting. Sincerely,/ 2 bcc, iTUG�191 �/C�% Name: Signature: `" May 3, 2016 City Of La Quinta Community Development Department- Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: City of la Quints Planning Commission RE: Proposed Tract Map #36817 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is concerning a proposed tract map that has direct and indirect consequences to our property located at We have been informed of the proposed tract map and are deeply concerned with the impacts this proposed map will have on our property, investment daily life, and the overall surrounding area. The following are a few of our concerns, in which we are requesting the Planning Commission to take into special consideration when determining the approval or disapproval of the proposed tract map: 1. The proposed tract map is on a 150' wide piece of land. The applicant is proposing ten 10,000 square foot lots, much smaller than our 1,25 acre lots (54,450 square feet), directly behind our backyards. These additional lots are squeezed between us at the Estates at La Quinta and Monterra to the South creating a very congested setting. 2. We built and established our community with the anticipation that the immediate surrounding properties would remain rural equestrian with larger lot configurations to maintain our quiet and tranquil environment The proposed tract directly contradicts these goals. 3. The noise and traffic that will be created, directly behind our backyards, is going to take away from our peaceful environment, which we have enjoyed for many years before this proposed project was planned. This proposed plan negatively impacts the environment that we have already established. 4. The S.5' wall height between our property and the proposed project is a safety concern to us. There are minimal activities currently on the property. With pedestrians and rats that will be directly behind our yards, we have concerns over security and safety, which the applicant does not plan to address in his construction efforts. S. This project will directly affect our views and landscape. There are well -established palm trees and landscape, provided by the owners at the ranch on their existing driveway. The applicant plans on removing much of this established landscape, which we have indirectly used for protection and enjoyed. The removal of this landscape and the low wall will open our backyards to the new proposed street and future homes, making us vulnerable. While this project may be within the current zoning regulations, it is not consistent with the zoning in which our community was formed over 20 years ago when the area was rural equestrian and 1.25 acre lots. We have established ourselves here under the impression that we would not be directly impacted with long-term growth, especially right in our backyards. While a second development is now being proposed just north of the Estates at La Quinta, that developer has met and worked with us to address and mitigate our concerns and issues. To the contrary, the developer of the proposed project to the south has a dismal communication and cooperation record with us, having no -showed a joint meeting scheduled by the City last September and more recently failing to respond at all to our issues expressed directly to the developer at our March 17 meeting at City Hall and subsequently in voicemails to the developer and his representative. I formally request for the planning commission to not approve this proposed map. I understand the applicant has a right to develop his property, and I am not opposed to a future map that provides less density and creates an environment that is consistent with our community. We know it is common for applicants to try to pass projects in the summer when many homeowners are not in town. Due to the many consequential factors of this proposed project, we formally request that any Planning Commission hearing be postponed to the fall, when a majority of our homeowners are back in town and have a better opportunity to be present at any meeting. Sincerely, Darlene Casella Name Signature: 81935 Mountain view Lane LQ Ca 92253 May 3, 2016 City of La Quinta Community Development Department- Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: City of La Quinta Planning Commission RE: Proposed Tract Map #36817 Dear Commissioners: This letter is concerning a proposed tract map that has direct and indirect consequences to our property located at 81905 Mountain View Lane in La Quinta. We have been informed of the proposed tract map and are deeply concerned with the impacts this proposed map will have on our property, investment, daily life, and the overall surrounding area. The following are a few of our concerns, in which we are requesting the Planning Commission to take into special consideration when determining the approval or disapproval of the proposed tract map: 1) The proposed tract map is on a 150' wide piece of land. The applicant is proposing ten 10,000 square foot lots, much smaller than our 1.25 acre lots (54,450 square feet), directly behind our backyards. These additional lots are squeezed between us at the Estates at La Quinta and Monterra to the South, creating a very congested setting. 2) We built and established our community with the anticipation that the immediate surrounding properties would remain rural equestrian with larger lot configurations to maintain our quiet and tranquil environment. The proposed tract directly contradicts these goals. 3) The noise and traffic that will be created, directly behind our backyards, is going to take away from our peaceful environment, which we have enjoyed for many years before this proposed project was planned. This proposed plan negatively impacts the environment that we have already established. 4) The 5.5' wall height between our property and the proposed project is a safety concern to us. There are minimal activities currently on the property. With pedestrians and cars that will be directly behind our yards, we have concerns over security and safety, which the applicant does not plan to address in his construction efforts. 5) This project will directly affect our views and landscape. There are well - established palm trees and landscape, provided by the owners at the ranch on their existing driveway. The applicant plans on removing much of this established landscape, which we have 'indirectly used for protection and enjoyed. The removal of this landscape and the low wall will open our backyards to the new proposed street and future homes, making us vulnerable. While this project may be within the current zoning regulations, it is not consistent with the zoning in which our community was formed over 20 years ago when the area was rural equestrian and 1.25 acre lots. We have established ourselves here under the impression that we would not be directly impacted with long-term growth, especially right in our backyards. While a second development is now being proposed just north of the Estates at La Quinta, that developer has met and worked with us to address and mitigate our concerns and issues. To the contrary, the developer of the proposed project to the south has a dismal communication and cooperation record with us, having no -showed a joint meeting scheduled by the City last September and more recently failing to respond at all to our issues expressed directly to the developer at our March 17 meeting at City Hall and subsequently in voicemails to the developer and his representative. I formally request for the planning commission to not approve this proposed map. I understand the applicant has a right to develop his property, and I am not opposed to a future map that provides less density and creates an environment that is consistent with our community. We know it is common for applicants to try to pass projects in the summer when many homeowners are not in town. Due to the many consequential factors of this proposed project, we formally request that any Planning Commission hearing be postponed to the fall, when a majority of our homeowners are back in town and have a better opportunity to be present at any meeting. Sincerely, Tom Brohard 81905 Mountain View Lane La Quinta, California 92253 Mary Brohard 81905 Mountain View Lane La Quinta, California 92253 April 14, 2016 City Of La Quinta Community Development Department- Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention; City of La Quinta Planning Commission RE: Proposed Tract Map #36817 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is concerning a proposed tract map that has direct and indirect consequences to our property located at We have been informed of the proposed tract map and are deeply concerned with the impacts this proposed map will have on our property, investment, daily life, and the overall surrounding area. The following are a few of our concerns, in which we are requesting the Planning Commission to take into special consideration when determining the approval or disapproval of the proposed tract map: 1. The proposed tract map is on a 150' wide piece of land. The applicant is proposing ten 10,000 square foot lots, much smaller than our 1.25 acre lots C54,450 square feet), directly behind our backyards. These additional lots are squeezed between us at the Estates at La Quinta and Monterra to the South, creating a very congested setting. 2. We built and established our community with the anticipation that the immediate surrounding properties would remain rural equestrian with larger lot configurations to maintain our quiet and tranquil environment. The proposed tract directly contradicts these goals. 3. The noise and traffic that will be created, directly behind our backyards, is going to take away from our peaceful environment, which we have enjoyed for many years before this proposed project was planned. This proposed plan negatively impacts the environment that we have already established. 4. The 5.5' wall height between our property and the proposed project is a safety concern to us. There are minimal activities currently on the property. With pedestrians and cars that will be directly behind our yards, we have concerns over security and safety, which the applicant does not plan to address in his construction efforts. 5. This project will directly affect our views and landscape. There are well -established palm trees and landscape, provided by the owners at the ranch on their existing driveway. The applicant plans on removing much of this established landscape, which we have indirectly used for protection and enjoyed. The removal of this landscape and the low wall will open our backyards to the new proposed street and future homes, making us vulnerable. While this project may be within the current zoning regulations, it is not consistent with the zoning in which our community was formed over 20 years ago when the area was rural equestrian and 1.25 acre Iots. We have established ourselves here under the impression that we would not be directly impacted with long-term growth, especially right in our backyards. While a second development is now being proposed just north of the Estates at La Quinta, that developer has met and worked with us to address and mitigate our concerns and issues. To the contrary, the developer of the proposed project to the south has a dismal communication and cooperation record with us, having no -showed a joint meeting scheduled by the City last September and more recently failing to respond at all to our issues expressed directly to the developer at our March 17 meeting at City Hall and subsequently in voicemails to the developer and his representative. I formally request for the planning commission to not approve this proposed map. I understand the applicant has a right to develop his property, and I am not opposed to a future map that provides less density and creates an environment that is consistent with our community. We know it is common for applicants to try to pass projects in the summer when many homeowners are not in town. Due to the many consequential factors of this proposed project, we formally request that any Planning Commission hearing be postponed to the fall, when a majority of our homeowners are back in town and have a better opportunity to be present at any meeting. Sincerely, fit f04 4/C aew April 22, 2016 City of La Quinta Community Development Department — Planning Commission 74 — 495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attn: City of La Quinta Planning Commission Re: Proposed Tract Map #36817 This letter concerns a proposed tract map that will have significant adverse consequences to our property that is located at 81845 Mountain View Lane in the Estates at La Quinta development. If the proposed narrow strip of land immediately to the south of our property is allowed to proceed as proposed it will have a very negative impact on our investment and enjoyment of life. The following are some of our concerns that we ask you to consider: 1. The piece of land is a narrow 150 ft. wide strip that is wedged in directly behind us, between the Estates at La Quinta and the Monterra to the South. The applicant is proposing ten, 10,000 sq. ft. lots, much smaller than our 54,450 sq. ft. lots, creating a very congested setting . The quiet tranquil environment that existed when we bought our property and upon which we counted will be no more. Although there was no guarantee that this strip of land would not be developed, it seemed unlikely that any one would try or be permitted to jam a dense subdivision on it. 2. The existing 5 ft. 6 in. wall between our property and the proposed development is far from adequate from a security, noise suppression, security and safety concern. 3. The project will directly affect our magnificent view to the South. There is well established landscaping included palm and citrus trees currently along the existing driveway and that the developer apparently plans to remove. While this project may be within the current zoning regulations, it is not consistent with the zoning in which our community was formed over 20 years ago and was rural equestrian and 1.25 acre lots. We purchased our property under the impression that we would not be directly impacted with a dense housing development in our back yard. Another development is being proposed immediately to the north of the Estates at La Quinta. That developer has met and worked with us to address and mitigate some of our concerns and issues. The developer to the South has a dismal record of communicating and cooperating with us. The developer did not show up at a joint meeting scheduled by the City last September and more recently failed to respond to any of our issues expressed directly to the developer at the March 17 meeting at City Hall and subsequently to the developer and his representative. We formally request the planning commission not approve this proposed map. We understand that the applicant has the right to develop his property, and we are not opposed to looking at a revised plan that provides for less density and creates an environment that is more consistent with our community. We request that any planning commission hearing be postponed until this fall when we and other owners are back in town so that we would have a better opportunity to be present. m Keith Byram Gwen Byram Owner Owner ppnl 14,2016 city DflaQuanta Commwiry Develcpmem Rpnmen - Planning Divisim 7"5 fallc Tan iw Is Qawq G945] innNon: C of le Claims Planning nimismon RE: Pmlooi TaalMp p36gl) Dor Sit w Mneem: Tltia Isom is mimnin a PwpweA oust MV that Gas noted uW induct cwxqurces w off m laticl at 0610 I-1 + Vnij Ljxasaa, Le.O Vt CA we n.v<beenw roof ulc pow wanmapwd.memgrwmmeawiln the ini this PAiffroal nap will says mow pm{erry, invnlmat eailr life, mW rte vwll mmheFing mee. ommhunwmea a man aawnrow amremg m often wenrt him: iff ing the PWmi ar C'munissipr w Inks most¢vial mweoNiw wnm aeemwng umappmywlurtliawpnvalnrw.p�won+most map. 1. ThefmPned mM m"is on a 150wih pine of 1". lh applicant is pmPmng to 10,0."O squx tat Idq mnL mWkr Jan ow 125 as Iola (54,45)sgwm lttljtrivially sahhnl our tvkyMa. Then#9eowl bn me goads hrnvan wff tho Formosan im Qtiw and MonNn no 0c Si crating n some wngcakaN 2. We Emit aM eewhlisMtl off commonly with 0c uniciP6an Jar Je uwtmiam announcing pmpmies would amain wml emissions vahn larger lot wcgwa n and wawnil emimtment The pmwxe man i initially vtvtlrity Jere gala. ]. the nolxwa tmRc that as 11 M cnWN. eirtng hhiM our backyards, is going to line away fian off pxerm environment which we have mloyoi(ur many rows 6cf than papsa paofen now Plwrl this PmPmM Plan negativity wM^aw nw anvirmmanl that vs: Mic awwcy cal a. The s r wan neipru mwvv uw pmprry and We pryMwa pelel is eaself reddens ere malW damageWe pMMarandom caYimsma.m Jut s. Iech rheacally keM1iw nur ews not. w neeemeererhadc timoms,. whwnueapvuemweanol pYa b WAess in Itieemumetimothers, 5. chiaprnjm w1m elrmllyt Insurance, ace, torawlawxup¢ amenIffa an welch enheirex seine roadway lmavere. oT.;eW an the uwman hOffew he much eathwar womfiJnvewh t we ff icmtplwmremor sh muctidier ands eYaWialea Ie mutualcafe, of has Mn imam the low me pm¢Jm and m1uYN. Themutual new arranied suraare mace low m dealing gin hatchable a bleum Our m the new pu%ead ela<I ma ruwre mnreq uaki,lg us mmeanm. Wfule gas parlon+r ne wilnin ue domain tmiir rtymnnuw. it is min surviWith do opting in which our my was tiwhen over zo Yea and wn Ceam wasroundpasadam eM 125 xrt lots .% have weal isheil ureelvnlerc wader the ngessim JY we would not he duffly lmpmW wio long-brm wrth,eyecally eirplmmM1ekram�- wnileasmo,weeaaopnw is anw M1eia PreN'�+llwl Mrihor lemwueovw velavimftadewam mutacea"iancamand mga.Tnhad the e.iNepmvtt.Tepma tm ueoughhad a distant communication eoiscrimnrecconmthm.need no:M1oww meeting activated by JeGar atnepanaud Mw twenty aeogmrasPooki nalm�ieuaaprcxM Jirto thelaWmow Marso1eWChly xml am ea�ymwr it rMimni us JedevuRe. and This ttpaemause 1normally realume for the alumna oumwissim to pq approm mis ryapad ran IuwvalM Je appliean for a right to deveop his pao�yl sod I an iM spfaoi to fumu ini gut devices less Jrnsitygrid erena an envimmcnt has it canonical with oweommwuy We know it is drought fir apvlwsnb b th bpw polala wJv. imum wMl mats M1ouvwrva art not in Own . Due b the Mara eo^^ W mntial Indeed; of &a pouted prefer, was formally IW" that ana flooding Conmiuim owning be paApivtl b the (n. when a Malw9 or over M1ourodwng we hack in bw and have a ndarerrp%nuniry W be plant a any inmuig SinonelY. n Nme: Wn Sieoana: April 14, 2016 City Of La Quinta Community Development Department- Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 9 2 2 S 3 Attention: City of La Quinta Planning Commission RE: Proposed Tract Map #36817 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is concerning a proposed tract map that has direct and indirect consequences to our property located at 81840 Mountain View Lane, La Quinta, CA 92253. We have been informed of the proposed tract map and are deeply concerned with the impacts this proposed map will have on our property, investment, daily life, and the overall surrounding area. The following are a few of our concerns, in which we are requesting the Planning Commission to take into special consideration when determining the approval or disapproval of the proposed tract map: 1. The proposed tract map is on a 150' wide piece of land. The applicant is proposing ten 10,000 square foot lots, much smaller than our 1.25 acre lots (54,450 square feet), directly behind our backyards. These additional lots are squeezed between us at the Estates at La Quinta and Monterra to the South, creating a very congested setting. 2. We built and established our community with the anticipation that the immediate surrounding properties would remain rural equestrian with larger lot configurations to maintain our quiet and tranquil environment. The proposed tract directly contradicts these goals. 3. The noise and traffic that will be created, directly behind our backyards, is going to take away from our peaceful environment, which we have enjoyed for many years before this proposed project was planned. This proposed plan negatively impacts the environment that we have already established. 4. The 5.5' wall height between our property and the proposed project is a safety concern to us. There are minimal activities currently on the property. With pedestrians and cars that will be directly behind our yards, we have concerns over security and safety, which the applicant does not plan to address in his construction efforts. 5. This project will directly affect our views and landscape. There are well -established palm trees and landscape, provided by the owners at the ranch on their existing driveway. The applicant plans on removing much of this established landscape, which we have indirectly used for protection and enjoyed. The removal of this landscape and the low wall will open our backyards to the new proposed street and future homes, making us vulnerable. While this project may be within the current zoning regulations, it is not consistent with the zoning in which our community was formed over 20 years ago when the area was rural equestrian and 1.25 acre lots. We have established ourselves here under the impression that we would not be directly impacted with long-term growth, especially right in our backyards. While a second development is now being proposed just north of the Estates at La Quinta, that developer has met and worked with us to address and mitigate our concerns and issues. To the contrary, the developer of the proposed project to the south has a dismal communication and cooperation record with us, having no -showed a joint meeting scheduled by the City last September and more recently failing to respond at all to our issues expressed directly to the developer at our March 17 meeting at City Hall and subsequently in voicemails to the developer and his representative. I formally request for the planning commission to not approve this proposed map. I understand the applicant has a right to develop his property, and I am not opposed to a future map that provides less density and creates an environment that is consistent with our community. We know it is common for applicants to try to pass projects in the summer when many homeowners are not in town. Due to the many consequential factors of this proposed project, we formally request that any Planning Commission hearing be postponed to the fall, when a majority of our homeowners are back in town and have a better opportunity to be present at any meeting. Sincerely, Bahram and Debbie Niknam Name r Signature 3/28/1b City Of La Quinta Community Development Department- Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: City of La Quinta Planning Commission RE: Proposed Tract Map #36817 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is concerning a proposed tract map that has direct and indirect consequences to our property located at tt ( �-3 Goo,, e— G— We have been informed of the proposed tract map and are deeply concerned with the impacts this proposed map with have on our property, investment, daily life, and the overall surrounding area. The following are a few of our concerns, in which we are requesting the Planning Commission to take special consideration when determining the approval or disapproval of the proposed tract map: 1. The proposed tract map is on a very narrow piece of land and the applicant is proposing several small lets, much smaller than our one - acre lots, directly in our backyard. These additional lots are squeezed between Monterra to the South and we feel this makes for a very congested setting. I We built and established our community with the anticipation that the immediate surrounding properties would remain rural equestrian or larger lot configurations to maintain our quite and tranquil environment. 3. The noise and traffic that will be created, directly in our backyards is going to takeaway from our peaceful environment, which we have enjoyed for many years before this proposed project was in planning or conceptualized. We have established our environment and this proposed plan directly effects what we have already established. 4_ The wall height between our property and the proposed project is a safety concern to us. There are minimal activities currently on the property, which does not concern us with having a lower than normal wall height. With pedestrians and cars now directly behind our yards, we have concerns over security and safety, which the applicant does not plan to address in his construction efforts. 5. This project will directly affect our views and landscape. There are well -established palm trees and landscape, provided by the owners at the ranch on their existing driveway. The applicant plans on removing all of this established landscape, which we have indirectly used for protection and enjoyed. The removal of this landscape and the low wall will open our backyards to the new proposed street and future homes, making us vulnerable. I understand that this project may be within the current zoning regulations, however, it is not consistent with the zoning in which our community was formed many years ago when the area was rural equestrian and 1-acre lots. We have established ourselves here under the impression that we would not be directly impacted with long -terra growth, especially right in our backyard. Our privacy is being disturbed to the North of our community, however, that developer has provided some set backs that help create a reasonable buffer. This proposed project is very tight to our backyards on the South and needs special consideration. I formally request for the planning commission to not approve this proposed map. I understand the applicant has a right to develop his property, and I am not opposed to a future map that provides less density and creates an environment that is consistent with our community. We know it is common for applicants to try and pass projects in the summer, when many homeowners are not in town. Due to the many consequential factors of this proposed project, we formally request that any Planning Commission hearing be postponed to the fall, when a majority of our homeowners are back in town for the fall and have a better opportunity to be present at any meeting. This letter was drafted for all HOA members located at The Estates of La Quinta, and presented for them to complete and sign, should they agree with the above - mentioned concerns. Sincerely, Name: ignature: April 14, 2016 City Of La Quinta Community Development Department- Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: City of La Quinta Planning Commission RE: Proposed Tract Map #36817 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is concerning a proposed tract map that has direct and indirect consequences to our property located at We have been informed of the proposed tract map and are deeply concerned with the impacts this proposed map will have on our property, investment, daily life, and the overall surrounding area. The following are a few of our concerns, in which we are requesting the Planning Commission to take into special consideration when determining the approval or disapproval of the proposed tract map: 1. The proposed tract map is on a 150' wide piece of land. The applicant is proposing ten 10,000 square foot lots, much smaller than our 1.25 acre lots (54,450 square feet), directly behind our backyards. These additional lots are squeezed between us at the Estates at La Quinta and Monterra to the South, creating a very congested setting. 2. We built and established our community with the anticipation that the immediate surrounding properties would remain rural equestrian with larger lot configurations to maintain our quiet and tranquil environment. The proposed tract directly contradicts these goals. 3. The noise and traffic that will be created, directly behind our backyards, is going to take away from our peaceful environment, which we have enjoyed for many years before this proposed project was planned. This proposed plan negatively impacts the environment that we have already established. 4. The 5.5' wall height between our property and the proposed project is a safety concern to us. There are minimal activities currently on the property. With pedestrians and cars that will be directly behind our yards, we have concerns over security and safety, which the applicant does not plan to address in his construction efforts. S. This project will directly affect our views and landscape. There are well -established palm trees and landscape, provided by the owners at the ranch on their existing driveway. The applicant plans on removing much of this established landscape, which we have indirectly used for protection and enjoyed. The removal of this landscape and the low wall will open our backyards to the new proposed street and future homes, making us vulnerable. While this project may be within the current zoning regulations, it is not consistent with the zoning in which our community was formed over 20 years ago when the area was rural equestrian and 1.25 acre lots. We have established ourselves here under the impression that we would not be directly impacted with long-term growth, especially right in our backyards. While a second development is now being proposed just north of the Estates at La Quinta, that developer has met and worked with us to address and mitigate our concerns and issues. To the contrary, the developer of the proposed project to the south has a dismal communication and cooperation record with us, having no -showed a joint meeting scheduled by the City last September and more recently failing to respond at all to our issues expressed directly to the developer at our March 17 meeting at City Hall and subsequently in voicemails to the developer and his representative. I formally request for the planning commission to not approve this proposed map. I understand the applicant has a right to develop his property, and I am not opposed to a future map that provides less density and creates an environment that is consistent with our community. We know it is common for applicants to try to pass projects in the summer when many homeowners are not in town. Due to the many consequential factors of this proposed project, we formally request that any Planning Commission hearing be postponed to the fall, when a majority of our homeowners are back in town and have a better opportunity to be present at any meeting. Sincerely, i i i-i- a A►� vw Name: `819c�o Mo.,tov-i-j Vicuo A - Signature: <��r 1 z April 14, 2016 City Of La Quinta Community Development Department- Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: City of La Quinta Planning Commission RE: Proposed Tract Map #36817 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is concerning a proposed tract map that has direct and indirect consequences to our property located at c, . e �L C;' 2ZZ 3 We have been informed of the proposed tract map and are deeply concerned with the impacts this proposed map will have on our property, investment, daily life, and the overall surrounding area. The following are a few of our concerns, in which we are requesting the Planning Commission to take into special consideration when determining the approval or disapproval of the proposed tract map: 1. The proposed tract map is on a 150' wide piece of land. The applicant is proposing ten 10,000 square foot lots, much smaller than our 1.25 acre lots (54,450 square feet), directly behind our backyards. These additional lots are squeezed between us at the Estates at La Quinta and Monterra to the South, creating a very congested setting. 2. We built and established our community with the anticipation that the immediate surrounding properties would remain rural equestrian with larger lot configurations to maintain our quiet and tranquil environment. The proposed tract directly contradicts these goals. 3. The noise and traffic that will be created, directly behind our backyards, is going to take away from our peaceful environment, which we have enjoyed for many years before this proposed project was planned. This proposed plan negatively impacts the environment that we have already established. 4. The 5.5' wall height between our property and the proposed project is a safety concern to us. There are minimal activities currently on the property. With pedestrians and cars that will be directly behind our yards, we have concerns over security and safety, which the applicant does not plan to address in his construction efforts. 5. This project will directly affect our views and landscape. There are well -established palm trees and landscape, provided by the owners at the ranch on their existing driveway. The applicant plans on removing much of this established landscape, which we have indirectly used for protection and enjoyed. The removal of this landscape and the low wall will open our backyards to the new proposed street and future homes, making us vulnerable. While this project may be within the current zoning regulations, it is not consistent with the zoning in which our community was formed over 20 years ago when the area was rural equestrian and 1.25 acre lots. We have established ourselves here under the impression that we would not be directly impacted with long-term growth, especially right in our backyards. While a second development is now being proposed just north of the Estates at La Quinta, that developer has met and worked with us to address and mitigate our concerns and issues. To the contrary, the developer of the proposed project to the south has a dismal communication and cooperation record with us, having no -showed a joint meeting scheduled by the City last September and more recently failing to respond at all to our issues expressed directly to the developer at our March 17 meeting at City Hall and subsequently in voicemails to the developer and his representative. I formally request for the planning commission to not approve this proposed map. I understand the applicant has a right to develop his property, and I am not opposed to a future map that provides less density and creates an environment that is consistent with our community. We know it is common for applicants to try to pass projects in the summer when many homeowners are not in town. Due to the many consequential factors of this proposed project, we formally request that any Planning Commission hearing be postponed to the fall, when a majority of our homeowners are back in town and have a better opportunity to be present at any meeting. Sincerely, Name: Signatur La-r 13 April 14, 2016 City Of La Quinta Community Development Department- Planning Division 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: City of La Quinta planning Commission RE: Proposed Tract Map #36817 Dear Sir or Madam: This letter is concerning a proposed tract -nap that has direct and indirect cons quences to our property located at 181 Q �. D n'1 o u n -1-- c. i,-) \1 tr --I L avi C Li of i.-t-� c f CA tj 2- v5'3 i We have been informed of the proposed tract map and are deeply concerned with the impacts this proposed map will have on our property, investment, daily life, and the overall surrounding area. The following are a few of our concerns, in which we are requesting the Planning Commission to take into special consideration when determining the approval or disapproval of the proposed tract map: 1. The proposed tract map is on a 150' wide piece of land. The applicant is proposing ten 10,000 square foot lots, much smaller than our 1.25 acre lots (54,450 square feet), directly behind our backyards. These additional lots are squeezed between us at the Estates at La Quinta and Monterra to the South, creating a very congested setting. 2. We built and established our community with the anticipation that the immediate surrounding properties would remain rural equestrian with larger lot configurations to maintain our quiet and tranquil environment. The proposed tract directly contradicts these goals. 3. The noise and traffic that will be created, directly behind our backyards, is going to take away from our peaceful environment, which we have enjoyed for many -years before this proposed project was planned. This proposed plan negatively impacts the environment that we have already established. 4. The 5.5' wall height between our property and the proposed project is a safety concern to us. There are minimal activities currently on the property, With pedestrians and cars that will be directly behind our yards, we have concerns over security and safety, which the applicant does not plan to address in his construction efforts. 5. This project will directly affect our views and landscape. There are well -established }calm trees and landscape, provided by the owners at the ranch on their existing driveway. The applicant plans on removing much of this established landscape, which we have indirectly used for protection and enjoyed. The removal of this landscape and the low wall will open our backyards to the new proposed street and future homes, making us vulnerable. While this project may be within the current zoning regulations, it is not consistent with the zoning in which our community was formed over 20 years ago when the area was rural equestrian and 1.25 acre lots. We have established ourselves here under the impression that we would not be directly impacted with long-term growth, especially right in our backyards. While a second development is now being proposed just north of the Estates at La Quinta, that developer has met and worked with us to address and mitigate our concerns and issues. To the contrary, the developer of the proposed project to the south has a dismal communication and cooperation record with us, having no -showed a joint meeting scheduled by the City last September and more recently failing to respond at all to our issues expressed directly to the developer at our March 17 meeting at City Hall and subsequently in voicemails to the developer and his representative. I formally request for the planning commission to not approve this proposed map. I understand the applicant has a right to develop his property, and I am not opposed to a future map that provides less density and creates an environment that is consistent with our community. We know it is common for applicants to try to pass projects in the summer when many homeowners are not in town. Due to the many consequential factors of this proposed project, we formally request that any Planning Commission hearing be postponed to the fall, when a majority of our homeowners are back in town and have a better opportunity to be present at any meeting. Sincerely, Name: Signature: May 18, 2016 Mr, Jay Wuu Principal Planner City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: Saddle Club Proposed Development Dear Mr. Wuu= We have been asked by Prism Realty to provide a letter of support for their proposed residential development adjacent to our community, the Estates at La Quinta. While change is inevitable, it is not always easy to accept. However, Prism Realty has met with our residents on several occasions, readily answered our questions and have either augmented their plans to adapt to the majority of our concerns or provided answers to satisfy our questions. Specific issues that we have discussed and mutually agreed upon include the following. ➢ Locate the entry gate/exit gate towards the west side of the community garden at Lot 37. ➢ Only single story homes will be built in the first row north of us. While the homes have not yet been designed, we prefer that the homes be a maximum of 20' high from concrete pad to the tallest point of the roof/architectural feature. Pad elevations must be equal to or lower than ours. Plant a landscaped buffer along the north side of our common wall at the conclusion of grading of the project. The majority of the buffer will be a minimum of 19' in width, irrigated and planted with trees and bushes as shown on the Concept Plan. The landscape buffer will be maintained by the project to soften sight lines of roofs/architectural features. ➢ In addition, we have been assured that we will be provided an opportunity to comment on any future landscaping and home design plans prior to the project being developed. They have been good to work with, cooperative and have been very responsive to our issues and concerns. This is in stark contrast to the proposed development to the south of us. As a board member of the Estates at La Quinta Homeowners Association, this letter confirms our support for the Prism Realty Proposed Saddle Club Residential Development. Sincerely, / o. -I A 4, Tom Brohard, Board of Directors Estates at La Quinta Homeowners Association 81905 Mountain View Lane La Quinta, CA 92253 PH 2 PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT DATE: MAY 24, 2016 CASE NUMBER: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2015-0003 APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST: THE PLACEMENT OF A 60-FOOT TALL MONOPALM WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AT FRITZ BURNS PARK CEQA: THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT HAS DETERMINED THAT THIS PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PURSUANT TO SECTION 15332 (CLASS 32) OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT IN THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT CAN BE CHARACTERIZED AS IN -FILL DEVELOPMENT AND SECTION 15303 (CLASS 3) FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION LOCATION: RECOMMENDED ACTION 78-060 FRANCIS HACK LANE Staff recommends that the Planning Commission continue consideration of Conditional Use Permit 2015-0003 to the June 14, 2016 Planning Commission meeting in order to complete the terms of a lease agreement between the City of La Quinta and the applicant for the proposed telecommunication tower. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY • Verizon Wireless is requesting approval of a 60-foot tall telecommunication tower within the eastern parking lot of Fritz Burns Park (Attachment 1). • Twelve antenna panels will attach to the tower at a height of 53 feet and be painted to match the faux palm fronds. The associated mechanical equipment will be located near the base of the tower. • As conditioned, the proposed facility complies with the requirements of the City's Telecommunication Ordinance and will increase service options in and around this portion of the City. Page 1 of 4 BACKGROUND Fritz Burns Park is located on the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Avenida Bermudas (Attachment 2). The park includes a dog park, skate park, swimming area, play area, and multiple tennis courts. Two parking lots are located along the southern portion of the park, off of Francis Hack Lane; a large primary parking lot where the majority of visitors park vehicles, and a smaller secondary lot that is infrequently used. PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS Verizon Wireless is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for a 60-foot tall monopalm within the secondary parking lot of Fritz Burns Park (Attachment 3). The tower includes a total of twelve antenna panels mounted at a height of 53 feet, and will be camouflaged with faux palm fronds (Attachment 3, Sheet A-4 - A5). The tower will be located within a new planter to the east of the large dog park (Attachment 3, Sheet A-1 - A-2). The total lease area of the facilities is 130 square feet. Mechanical equipment, including multiple cabinets and a backup generator, will be located in an existing planter to the south of the tower. The planter areas will be heavily landscaped with Yellow Trailing Lantana, and two additional live palm trees (42-foot tall, 36-foot brown trunk height) are proposed near the tower to provide vegetative screening (Attachment 3, Sheet L-2). The colors of the cabinets are gray/beige; however, they can be painted. Staff recommends that the cabinets be painted a medium or dark green color, which should help blend with the proposed landscape screening. Site Justification: The Municipal Code contains provisions for new towers to first explore opportunities for collocation as a means of maximizing existing tower facilities and minimizing the number of new towers in the City. The applicant has prepared a justification letter which provides an alternative site analysis explaining why a new tower is preferred versus locating on existing tower sites in the vicinity (Attachment 4). The applicant reviewed two alternatives, both utilizing an existing tower site in the adjacent City Public Works Yard, and determined both options to be infeasible due to access and/or cost. Therefore, the applicant has proposed a new facility. The tower is capable of providing space for future collocation, with lease details still being negotiated. The proposed use will be compatible with all of the specific site location, development, and operation standards related to wireless telecommunications facilities. The proposal will not prove detrimental to the surrounding neighborhood or the general public with fulfillment of the recommended conditions of approval. In addition to those facts and observations contained in this report to support this request, it is not anticipated that the proposal will interfere with local radio, television, or emergency reception, as the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates transmission Page 2 of 4 frequencies. Furthermore, the applicant will be required to operate the wireless telecommunications facility in compliance with the American National Standard Institute (ANSI) standards for professionally acceptable radio frequency (RF) emissions for all types of communications towers. Compliance with the above regulations will ensure that the facility poses no interference to surrounding land uses. Pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, the City of La Quinta is prohibited from using environmental effects of RF emissions as justification for approval or denial of a wireless telecommunication facility. However, all wireless telecommunication facilities are required to comply with FCC regulations regarding the emission and transmission of electromagnetic radiation and radio frequency emissions that may result from the project. AGENCY AND PUBLIC REVIEW Public Outreach: The proposed tower is located in direct view of existing single-family homes within the Tradition residential community (Attachment 3, Sheet T-3 - T-5). Staff directed the applicant to participate in outreach with the impacted homeowners, as well as with the Tradition Homeowners Association (HOA). In late March of this year, the applicant sent an introductory letter and photo simulations to homeowners and the Tradition HOA. To date, one response has been received (Attachment 5). The resident did not express opposition to the proposal, but did request additional information that the applicant provided. Public Agency Review: This request was sent to all applicable City departments and affected public agencies. All written comments received are on file and available for review with the Design and Development Department. All applicable comments have been adequately addressed and/or incorporated in the recommended Conditions of Approval. Public Notice: This project was advertised in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 13, 2016, and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site. To date, no comments have been received. Any written comments received will be handed out at the Planning Commission Hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Design and Development Department has determined that this project is exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15332 (Class 32) of the California Environmental Quality Act as in -fill development and Section 15303 (Class 3) for new construction or conversion of small structures. Prepared by: Jay S. Wuu, AICP, Principal Planner Approved for submission: Gabriel Perez, Planning Manager Page 3 of 4 Attachments: 1. Project Information 2. Project Area Map 3. Verizon Wireless Conditional Use Permit Plan Set 4. Verizon Wireless Project Justification 5. Public Outreach Response Letter Page 4 of 4 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR PLACEMENT OF A 60- FOOT TALL MONOPALM WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER AND EQUIPMENT AT FRITZ BURNS PARK, AND FINDING THE PROJECT EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT CASE NUMBER: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2015-0003 APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California did, on the 24th day of May, 2016, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider a request by Verizon Wireless for approval of a 60-foot tall monopalm wireless telecommunication tower and mechanical equipment at Fritz Burns Park, generally located on the southeast corner of Avenue 52 and Avenida Bermudas, more particularly described as: /e1a101VFill a1.014[QiII WHEREAS, the Design and Development Department published a public hearing notice in The Desert Sun newspaper on May 13, 2016 as prescribed by the Municipal Code. Public hearing notices were also mailed to all property owners within 500 feet of the site; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any, of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Planning Commission did make the following mandatory findings pursuant to Section 9.170.090 of the Municipal Code to justify approval of said Conditional Use Permit: 1. Consistency with General Plan The design of the proposed wireless facility is consistent with La Quinta General Plan, which requires utilities and communication facilities to be available, adequate and convenient for all residents. The applicant has determined that a need for this type of service, in this general area, exists and providing such a facility will ensure that the public has access to such services. The placement of the monopalm tower at this site will have a negligible impact on the surrounding public thoroughfares and land uses. 2. Public Welfare The proposed wireless facility will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. The facility will provide enhanced communication services to the surrounding area, Planning Commission Resolution 2016 - Conditional Use Permit 2015-0003 Applicant: Verizon Wireless Monopalm (Verizon Wireless) May 24, 2016 Page 2 of 3 including emergency and public safety communications. The facility is located within a public park, adjacent to the City maintenance yard. The nearest residence is approximately 160 feet to the north, separated by two roads and a landscaping buffer. The wireless facility is required to comply with the American National Standard Institute (ANSI) standards for professionally acceptable radio frequency emissions to ensure the antennas will not interfere with the surrounding land uses; 3. Visual Impacts The proposed wireless telecommunication facility minimizes adverse visual impacts through careful design and site placement. The facility utilizes a small footprint within an underutilized parking area, and the facility is proposed as a stealth Monopalm, which fronds should minimize the visual impacts of the facility. 4. Tower Design The proposed wireless telecommunication facility is designed at the minimal height to achieve the service provides objectives for coverage within this portion of the community. The proposed camouflaged wireless communications facility, as conditioned, to be a 40-foot facility with a concurrent one-time modification to include a height increase of 20-feet as allowed within Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, enables carriers the right to utilize a one-time modification to include a height increase of 20-feet 5. Justification The proposed wireless telecommunication facility is necessary, as shown in the applicant's justification letter, to improve community access to wireless service. A significant gap in coverage exists for Verizon customers in this area of the City. Therefore, this facility is necessary to improve community access to wireless services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: SECTION 1. That the above recitations are true and constitute the findings of the Planning Commission in this case. SECTION 2. That the above project be determined by the Planning Commission to be exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15332 and 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines. Planning Commission Resolution 2016 - Conditional Use Permit 2015-0003 Applicant: Verizon Wireless Monopalm (Verizon Wireless) May 24, 2016 Page 3 of 3 SECTION 3. That it does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit 2015-0003, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City of La Quinta Planning Commission, held on this the 24th day of May, 2016, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ROBERT WILKINSON, Chairperson City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: GABRIEL PEREZ, Planning Manager City of La Quinta, California PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2015-0003 APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS Page 1 of 4 1. The applicant agrees to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of La Quinta ("City"), its agents, officers and employees from any claim, action or proceeding to attack, set aside, void, or annul the approval of this Conditional Use Permit. The City shall have sole discretion in selecting its defense counsel. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action or proceeding and shall cooperate fully in the defense. 2. The applicant shall comply with all applicable provisions of the La Quinta Municipal Code (LQMC), including Chapter 9.170 and Chapter 9.210.020. 3. The Conditional Use Permit shall expire on May 24, 2018 and shall become null and void in accordance with Municipal Code Section 9.200.080, unless the use has been established. A time extension may be requested per LQMC Section 9.200.080. 4. Any expansion or substantial modifications to the approved plan shall require an amendment of this Conditional Use Permit. Minor modifications to this Conditional Use Permit shall be considered by the Design and Development Director, and may require notification of surrounding property owners prior to such approval. All other amendments shall be processed in accordance with LQMC 9.200.100. 5. Prior to the issuance of any grading, construction, or building permit by the City, the applicant shall obtain any necessary clearances and/or permits from the following agencies, if required: • La Quinta Building Division • Imperial Irrigation District (IID) • Federal Communication Commission • Federal Aviation Administration The applicant is responsible for all requirements of the permits and/or clearances from the above listed agencies. When the requirements include approval of improvement plans, the applicant shall furnish proof of such approvals when submitting those improvements plans for City approval. 6. Approval of this Conditional Use Permit shall not be construed as approval for any horizontal dimensions implied by site plans or exhibits unless specifically identified in the conditions of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2015-0003 VERIZON WIRELESS Page 2 of 4 7. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual attorney's fees incurred by the City Attorney to review, negotiate and/or modify any documents or instruments required by these conditions, if Developer requests that the City modify or revise any documents or instruments prepared initially by the City to effect these conditions. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. 8. Developer shall reimburse the City, within thirty (30) days of presentment of the invoice, all costs and actual consultant's fees incurred by the City for engineering and/or surveying consultants to review and/or modify any documents or instruments required by this project. This obligation shall be paid in the time noted above without deduction or offset and Developer's failure to make such payment shall be a material breach of the Conditions of Approval. UTILITIES 9. The applicant shall comply with the provisions of LQMC Section 13.24.110 (Utilities). 10. The applicant shall obtain the approval of the City Engineer for the location of all utility lines within any right-of-way, and all above -ground utility structures including, but not limited to, traffic signal cabinets, electric vaults, water valves, and telephone stands, to ensure optimum placement for safety, practical and aesthetic purposes. 11. Underground utilities shall be installed prior to overlaying hardscape. For installation of utilities in existing improved streets, the applicant shall comply with trench restoration requirements as required by the City Engineer. The applicant shall provide certified reports of all utility trench compaction for approval by the City Engineer. Additionally, grease traps and the maintenance thereof shall be located so as to not conflict with access aisles/entrances. MAINTENANCE 12. Any disturbed areas including landscaping shall be replaced in -kind. PLANNING 13. The proposed telecommunication facility shall comply with all federal and state statutes, including, but not limited to, FCC licensing, NIER levels, and FAA requirements. No wireless telecommunication facility or combination of facilities shall produce, at any time; power densities that exceed current FCC adopted standards for human exposure for RF (Radio Frequency Radiation Exposure PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2015-0003 VERIZON WIRELESS Page 3 of 4 Standards) fields. Failure to comply with FCC Standards will result in the immediate cessation of operation of the wireless telecommunication facility. 14. All wireless telecommunication facilities shall be installed and maintained in compliance with the requirements of the Uniform Building Code, National Electrical Code, the City's noise ordinance, and other applicable codes, as well as other restrictions specified in the permit and the La Quinta Municipal Code. The facility operator and the property owner shall be responsible for maintaining the facility in good condition, which shall include, but not be limited to, regular cleaning, painting, and general upkeep and maintenance of the site consistent with the facility's original approval. 15. The panel antennas shall be mounted securely to the monopalm tower. All antennas and antenna arrays shall be painted to match the faux palm fronds and shall be shielded from view by the tower's faux palm fronds. The final design of the screening material shall be approved by the Design and Department Director. 16. Branches shall extend a minimum of 18 inches beyond the antenna arrays. 17. 70% of all branches shall be eight (8) feet in length or longer 18. Antennas, equipment, and all ancillary components shall be stealth to the maximum extent feasible. 19. The applicant shall negotiate in good faith for shared use by third parties; an owner generally will negotiate in the order in which requests for information are received, except an owner generally will negotiate with a party who has received an FCC license or permit before doing so with other parties. 20. Verizon Wireless shall have a continuing obligation to respond to and resolve any and all complaints associated with any potential interference with frequencies related to residential and/or life safety communications and operations. Response shall be within 48 hours of receipt of notice of any such complaints. 21. The placement of the pole shall not interfere with the existing infrastructure and improvements at this location. The pole shall not be placed on a public paths -of - travel and must be located in the proposed lease enclosure. 22. The wireless telecommunication facility operators are required to notify the City of La Quinta's Planning Division within sixty (60) days of any change of ownership of the facility. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 2016- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2015-0003 VERIZON WIRELESS Page 4 of 4 23. This telecommunication facility is subject to a ten-year review by the Planning Commission. The review will determine whether or not the originally approved telecommunication facility and accessory equipment are still in compliance with the conditions of approval, and that all radio frequencies are in compliance with FCC OET Bulletin 65. This report shall be prepared by a qualified licensed engineer. 24. The entire facility shall be maintained in a condition consistent with the conditions of this approval and, if the facility is not so maintained this approval is subject to revocation or other correcting actions as determined appropriate by the City. 25. No cables, conduit or other equipment on the monopalm tower pole shall be visible. All electrical work for the proposed antennas shall be contained within the monopalm tower cavity. 26. The entire facility shall be maintained in a condition consistent with the conditions of this approval with no visible deterioration of the faux palm treatment and all landscaping, including the required additional two (2) palm trees, in a live healthy status. If the facility is not so maintained, this approval is subject to revocation or other correcting actions as determined appropriate by the City. 27. The proposed mono -palm shall be approved at a height of 40 feet with a concurrent one time height modification taken under Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Job Creation Act of 2012, for an ultimate height of 60 feet. ATTACHMENT 1 Proiect Information CASE NUMBER: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 2015-0003 APPLICANT: VERIZON WIRELESS PROPERTY OWNER: CITY OF LA QUINTA REQUEST: THE PLACEMENT OF A 60-FOOT TALL MONOPALM WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATION TOWER AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AT FRITZ BURNS PARK LOCATION: 78-060 FRANCIS HACK LANE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: OPEN SPACE - RECREATION ZONING DESIGNATION: PARKS AND RECREATION SURROUNDING ZONING/LAND USES: NORTH: PARKS AND RECREATION EXISTING PUBLIC PARK SOUTH: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL EXISTING RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY EAST: MAJOR COMMUNITY FACILITIES CITY YARD WEST: PARKS AND RECREATION EXISTING PUBLIC PARK I Ll .,r . f :tea �:�',°� +r ' 'a' � ' 7� " "�•�.`:4�r.'�1'±► * � �'� CALLS-DURANGO 'F� �- 77, a'r f � - . --- �' 'jI 1 t L , AVENUE 52 _ � •�_ _ -�.�� _ -. - _ r si NINE: f� f aec Will o woo A - Ff U �Iitl e I s o ij 07 f z :y. r_ .1 art F r t JL F.� Verizon (Chihuahua) ProjectArea Site Map ATTACHMENT 2 n n A 2 z May 23, 2016 N City of La Quinta Planning Division GEM gj'i c.DESEVU — Design & Development Department OVERALL HEIGHT 60'-0" PROJECT TEAM aI_L1,111►[5 COMPANY: SMARTLINK, LLC ADDRESS: 18401 VON KARMAN AVE, SUITE 400 CITY, STATE, ➢P: IRVINE, CA 92612 CONTACT: JIM ROGERS PHONE: (949) 295-9031 E-MAIL: james.mgers@smartlinkllc.com SITE AQUISITION COMPANY: SMARTUNK, LLC ADDRESS: 18401 VON KARMAN AVE, SUITE 400 CITY, STATE, ➢P: IRVINE, CA 92612 CONTACT: DANEEN WILDER PHONE: (714) 936-1030 E-MAIL: daneen.wilder@smartlinkllc.com ENGINEER COMPANY: SMARTUNK, LLC ADDRESS: 18401 VON KARMAN AVE, SUITE 400 CITY, STATE, ➢P: IRVINE, CA 92612 CONTACT: JAMES GONZALEZ, PE PHONE: (510) 772-7415 E-MAIL: james.gonzalez@smartlinkllccom PROJECT SURVEYOR COMPANY: FLOYD SURVEYING ADDRESS: 34006 GALLERON STREET CITY, STATE, ZIP: TEMECULA, CA 92592 CONTACT: DAVID A FLOYD PHONE: (949) 200-0626 E-MAIL: fsi@floydsuweying.com SIGNATURE BLOCK THE FOLLOWING PARTIES HEREBY APPROVE AND ACCEPT THESE DOCUMENTS & AUTHORIZE THE SUBCONTRACTOR TO PROCEED WITH CONSTRUCTION DESCRIBED HEREIN. ALL DOCUMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY THE LOCAL BUILDING DEPARTMENT & MAY IMPOSE CHANGES OR MODIFICATIONS. DISCIPLINE: SIGNATURE: DATE: SITE ACQUISITION MANAGER: CONSTRUCTION MANAGER: RE ENGINEER: verizon� CHIHUAHUA (MCE DESIGN) FRITZ BURNS PARK 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY PROJECT SUMMARY APPLICANT/LESSEE COMPANY: VERIZON WIRELESS ADDRESS: 15505 SAND CANYON AVE CITY, STATE, ➢P: IRVINE, CA 92618 PHONE: (949) 286-7000 APPLICANT'S REPRESENTATIVE COMPANY: SMARTUNK, LLC ADDRESS: 18401 VON KARMAN AVE, SUITE 400 CITY, STATE, ZIP: IRVINE, CA 92612 CONTACT: JIM ROGERS PHONE: (949) 295-9031 E-MAIL james.mgers@smartlinkllc.com PROPERTY OWNER: NAME: CITY OF LA QUINTA ADDRESS: 79495 CALLE TAMPICO CITY, STATE, ➢P: LA QUINTA, CA 92253 CONTACT: TED SHOVE PHONE: (760) 777-7131 E-MAIL: tshove@laquinta.org PROPERTY INFORMATION: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEE LS-1 APN #: 770-184-011 COUNTY: RIVERSIDE COUNTY JURISDICTION: CITY OF LA QUINTA CURRENT ZONING: PR (PARKS & RECREATION) CONSTRUCTION INFORMATION: AREA OF CONSTRUCTION: EQUIPMENT AREA = 130 SQ. FT. ANTENNA POLE AREA = 29 SQ. FT. TOTAL SQ. ET. = 159 SQ. FT. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B (NON RATED) PROPOSED USE: UNMANNED TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY HANDICAP REQUIREMENTS: FACILITY IS UNMANNED AND NOT FOR HUMAN HABITATION. HANDICAPPED ACCESS NOT REQUIRED. VICINITY MAP e'da Menfatoma G' a (n E Fonda A, L��u,nra a Gommuniry Park. a 9 - GII Esteda CJl Fonury.. — — `—° Ave Nneshe n � ender alone n n ¢52 P CII Amigo Fntz 6um6PeNA4 4anYan Cr Y. � ;,eyale - Calleourangn Franos Hacl,i i '3 � Calle5anore 3 Calle Ensenada e .a 5 I DRIVING DIRECTIONS 1 FROM VERIZON WIRELESS OFFICE: HEAD SOUTHEAST TOWARD SAND CANYON SIDE PATH/SAND CANYON TRAIL 322 FT, TURN RIGHT ONTO SAND CANYON AVE 0.3 MI, USE THE LEFT 2 LANES TO TURN LEFT AT THE 1ST CROSS STREET ONTO BARRANCA PKWY 1.1 ML TURN RIGHT ONTO PACIFICA 440 FT, TURN RIGHT ONTO THE STATE HIGHWAY 133 N RAMP 0.2 M4 MERGE ONTO CA-133 N (PARTIAL TOLL ROAD) 4.0 MI, KEEP LEFT AT THE FORK TO STAY ON CA-133 N (TOLL ROAD) 1.0 MI, MERGE ONTO CA-241 N (TOLL ROAD) 10.9 MI, USE THE RIGHT 2 LANES TO TAKE EXIT 39A TO MERGE ONTO CA-91 E TOWARD RIVERSIDE (PARTIALTOLL ROAD) 23.0 MI, KEEP LEFT TO STAY ON CA-91 E 1.5 MI USE THE RIGHT 2 LANES TO TAKE EXIT 65 B FOR CA-60 E/I-215 S TOWARD SAN DIEGOANDIO 0.6 MI, MERGE ONTO CA-60 E 0.3 MI, CONTINUE ONTO CA-60 EA-215 S 4.4 MI, KEEP LEFT AT THE FORK TO CONTINUE ON CA-60 E 18.2 MI MERGE ONTO I-10 E 43.3 ML TAKE EXIT 137 FOR WASHINGTON ST 0.2 MI, CONTINUE ON WASHINGTON ST. DRIVE TO FRANCIS HACK LN IN LA QUINTA 14 MIN (6.9 MI), USE THE RIGHT 2 LANES TO TURN RIGHT ONTO WASHINGTON ST 2.8 ML CONTINUE STRAIGHT TO STAY ON WASHINGTON ST 3.3 MI, USE THE RIGHT 2 LANES TO TURN RIGHT ONTO AVENUE 52 0.5 M4 USE THE LEFT LANE TO TURN LEFT ONTO AVENIDA BERMUDAS 0.1 MI, TURN LEFT ONTO FRANCIS HACK LN;DESTINATION WILL BE ON THE LEFT 472 FT, ARRIVE; 78100 FRANCIS HACK LN LA QUINTA, CA 92253 PROJECT DESCRIPTION CONSTRUCTION OF AN UNMANNED WIRELESS CELL SITE FOR VERIZON WIRELESS. THIS PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF: INSTALLING A 60'-0" HIGH MONOPALM WITH (12) PANEL ANTENNAS, (12) RRU'S + A2 RADIOS, (2) SURGE SUPPRESSORS; AND (2) MACROCELL EQUIPMENT CABINETS, (1) 54 GALLONS DIESEL STAND-BY GENERATOR, COAX/HYBRID CABLES, WITH CONNECTIONS AS REQUIRED FOR POWER AND TELCO. ATTACHMENT 3 SHEET DESCRIPTION T-1 TITLE SHEET T-2 PHOTO SIMULATIONS T-3 PHOTO SIMULATIONS T-4 PHOTO SIMULATIONS T-5 PHOTO SIMULATIONS LS-1 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY LS-2 TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY A-1 OVERALL SITE PLAN A-1.1 ENLARGED AREA PLAN A-2 ENLARGED EQUIPMENT LAYOUT A-3 ENLARGED ANTENNA & AREA LAYOUT A-4 SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS A-5 NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS L-1 IRRIGATION PLAN L-2 PLANTING PLAN L-3 IRRIGATION DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS L-4 PLANTING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS I CODE COMPLIANCE 1 ALL WORK AND MATERIALS SHALL BE PERFORMED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES AS ADOPTED BY THE LOCAL GOVERNING AUTHORITIES. NOTHING IN THESE PLANS IS TO BE CONSTRUED TO PERMIT WORK NOT CONFORMING TO THE LATEST EDITIONS OF THE FOLLOWING CODES. 1. 2013 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE - 6.2013 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE - TITLE 24, PART 2 TITLE 24, PART 6 2. 2013 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE - 7.2013 CALIFORNIA GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS TITLE 24, PART 2.5 CODE - TITLE 24, PART 11 12013 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE - TITLE 24, PART 3 4.2013 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE - TITLE 24, PART 4 5.2013 CALIFORNIA PLUMBING CODE - TITLE 24, PART 5 n� THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS 15 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 QF 02/05/16 REVISED PER PLANNER COMMENTS QE 01/20/16 PHOTO SIMULATIONS QD 12/14/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION CQ 10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION Q10/01/15 100%ZONING DRAWINGS z-9/03/15 90%ZONING DRAWMGS REV I DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: W J R CHECKED BY: J B PROJECT INFORMATION: CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: TITLE SHEET SHEET NUMBER: REV.: T-1 F verizon✓ PHOTO SIMULATIONS CHIHUAHUA 781 O❑ FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QLIINTA CA 92253 "ARTISTIC engineering AEsims.com 8T/.BAE.slms on✓ THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS 15 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 Q02/05/16 REVISED PER PLANNER COMMENTS Q01/20/16 PHOTO SIMULATIONS Q12/14/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION Al10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION QB 10/01/15 100%ZONING DRAWINGS QA 09/03/15 90%ZONING DRAWINGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJ R CHECKED BY: J B PROJECT INFORMATION: CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: PHOTO SIMULATIONS SHEET NUMBER: REV.: T-2 F verizon✓ PHOTO SIMULATIONS CHIHUAHUA 781 O❑ FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QLIINTA CA 92253 "ARTISTIC engineering AEsims.com 8T/.BAE.slms on✓ THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 Q02/05/16 REVISED PER PLANNER COMMENTS Q01/20/16 PHOTO SIMULATIONS Q12/14/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION Al10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION QB 10/01/15 100%ZONING DRAWINGS QA 09/03/15 90%ZONING DRAWINGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJ R CHECKED BY: J U PROJECT INFORMATION: CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: PHOTO SIMULATIONS SHEET NUMBER: REV.: T-3 F verizonv PHOTO SIMULATIONS CHIHUAHUA 781 O❑ FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QLIINTA CA 92253 "ARTISTIC engineering AEsims.com 8T/.BAE.slms THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS 15 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 QF 02/05/16 REVISED PER PLANNER COMMENTS QE 01/20/16 PHOTO SIMULATIONS QD 12/14/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION QC 10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION QB 10/01/15 100% ZONING DRAWINGS QA 09/03/15 9011ZONING HANGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJ R CHECKED BY: J B PROJECT INFORMATION. CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: PHOTO SIMULATIONS SHEET NUMBER: REV.: T-4 F verizonv PHOTO SIMULATIONS CHIHUAHUA 781 O❑ FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QLIINTA CA 92253 "ARTISTIC engineering AEsims.com 8T/.BAE.slms THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS 15 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 QF 02/05/16 REVISED PER PLANNER COMMENTS QE 01/20/16 PHOTO SIMULATIONS QD 12/14/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION QC 10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION QB 10/01/15 100% ZONING DRAWINGS QA 09/03/15 9011ZONING HANGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJ R CHECKED BY: J B PROJECT INFORMATION. CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: PHOTO SIMULATIONS SHEET NUMBER: REV.: T-5 F PROPOSED DESCRIPTIONS PALM DESERT LEASE AREA: � 10 T � V BEING A PORTION OF PARCEL 2 RI PARCEL MAP N0. 36329, IN THE 3 15505 SAND CANYON A VENUE CITY OF LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BUILDINi 1ST FLOOR PER INCLUSIVE, IV MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 233, PAGES 99 THROUGH 102 INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID IRVINE, CA 92618 COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SETOFDRAWINGS IS / COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF FRANCES HACK LANE N 1OD AND AVENIDA BERMUDAS; SAID CENTERLINE OF FRANCES HACK LANE PROPRIETARY& CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS 52ND AVENUE F-125 HAVING A BEARING OF NORTH 89'48'30"EAST, WITH ALL BEARINGS HEREIN H I RELATIVE THERETO; THENCE, RTH 83'06'05"EAST, A DISTANCE OF OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT TO ANY UVERIZON 379.26AFEET TOPOINT OFOBEGINNING; THENCE,NORTH OC THE 8EAST18" WIRE ESS SSTRICTLY P PROHIBITSE ED L-599—Z'Z'0/ HENCE, SOUT00° N 8T55'10" E 167.98' I DISTANCE OF 13.00 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 8930'18"WEST, A DISTANCE - - OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 00'29'42"WEST, A DISTANCE OF 13.00 o LA QUINTA gvenue 50 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. - SITE IN 44'S1'S8" E CONTAINING 130 SQUARE FEET, MORE -0R LESS. s nn a rtl i n. 46.72' I Aven ue 52 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE VICINITY MAP SUITE 400 to IRVINE, CA 92612 11.43' TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 CITY OF LA QUINTA Im APN: 770-184-011 o �N U) 4 IV Q m Z CO N Vw W �C m TRTP I 105.02 I Q Q C/L PROPOSED TELCO ROUTE N 00'30'01" W z SEE DETAIL 108.14' W SHEET LS-2 {2 > I LEGEND Q IN89'30'07" E 281.63' PRDNG ❑ TRTP2 125,76 I 0 At TRTP2 These standard symbols will be found in the drawing. N 55'20'15" W 88.54 2 11-16-15 LEASE AREA 43.98' TRTP2 0 BUSH - 118.75 ® ELECTRIC BOX 1 9-16-15 TITLEREVIEW _ _ _ _ _ _ 741.43 TRTP o IRRIGATION VALVE ----_ - -0687 -- ��SEF 141,56 - LIGHT POLE 0 08-16-15 SITE SURVEY O FOUND MONUMENT FR i SIGN ALMuous REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION CALLE DURANGO #70EOFPOIRNT SEE ITEM OF PTR TREE PREE - - ACCESS POINTS ES W UTILITY LE FLOYD A WATER METER BC BOTTOM OF CURB SURVEYING ELTR ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT 34006 GALLERON STREET FL FLOWLINE CURB & GUTTER FNCP FENCE TOP TEMECULA, CA 92592 OFFICE: (949) 200-0626 SCALE: 1 80 40 0 80 OVERALL SITE PLAN LIP LIP OF GUTTER EMAIL: fsi®floydsurveying.com 1.7_80. LP LIGHT POLE TOP NG GROUND SPOT ELEVATION PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP NO. 36329, IN THE CITY OF TITLE REPORT NOTES: TITLE REPORT NOTES CONTINUED: PS PAINT STRIPING LA QUINTA, COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, STATE OF SW SIDEWALK CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 233, THE FOLLOWING EASEMENTS EFFECT SAID PARCEL AND ITEM #7 - Covenants, conditions, restrictions and TO TOP OF CURB PAGES 99 THROUGH 102, INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, ARE SHOWN HEREON. SEE PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT easements but omitting any covenants or restrictions, if TRTP TREE TOP DECIDUOUS Dar1d A, nayd IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID NO.997-23068216-A-ML3 PREPARED BY FIDELITY any, including but not limited to those based upon race, TRTP2 TREE TOP PALM t 1� COUNTY. NATIONAL TITLE COMPANY AND DATED AUGUST 4, 2015 FOR OTHER DOCUMENTS (NON -EASEMENTS) EFFECTING color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, TW TOP OF WALL SAID PROPERTY. ancestry, source of income, gender, gender identity, expression, medical condition or - - BOUNDARY LINE ITEM #2 - Reservations contained in the Patent gender genetic information, as set forth in applicable state or federal - CENTERLINE CA laws, except to the extent that said covenant or MISC. PROPERTY LINE From: The United States of America restriction is permitted by applicable law, as set forth in MISC. TIE LINE PROJECT INFORMATION: Recording Date: January 5, 1916 the document ^ ^ Recording No: In Book 7 Page 96 of Patents RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE CHiHU H U H (EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD) Recording Date: February 20, 1951 Recording No: In Book 1245 Page 556 Official Records — EASEMENT LINE 78060 FRANCIS HACK ITEM #3 - Easements) for the purpose(s) shown below X. FENCE LINE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 and rights incidental thereto, as granted in a document: (EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD) OWNERS NAME: OF RIVERSIDE COUNTY LEGEND Granted to: Nevada -California Electric Corporation Purpose: Pole lines, conduits ITEM #10 - The ownership of said Land does not CITY LA QUINTA PARCEL NUMBER(S) 770-184-011 Recording Date: September 17, 1937 include rights of access to or from the street, highway,ASSESSORS 9 Recording No: In Book 344 Page 143 Official Records or freeway abutting said Land, such rights having been BASIS OF BEARINGS: (NAD83; EPOCH 2O10) (EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD) relinquished by said map/plat. THE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED CALIFORNIA STATE PLANE 1) This is not a boundary survey. This is a specialized topographic map. The DRAWNBY: CHECKEDBY: ITEM #4 - Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below incidental thereto, in document Affects: Frances Hack Lane and Avenida Bermudas COORDINATE SYSTEM - ZONE 6. AS DETERMINED BY G.P.S.. property lines and easements shown hereon are from record information as noted DAF DAF and rights as ranted a g 9 exce t at access Dints as shown on Parcel Ma No. excep p p OBSERVATIONS, USING TRIMBLE 5700/5800 RECEIVERS AND TRIMBLE hereon. Floyd Surveying translated the topographic survey to record information Granted to: Nevada -California Electric Corporation GEODETIC OFFICE 1.60 SOFTWARE. using the two found monuments shown hereon. No title research was. performed SHEET TITLE., Purpose: Pole lines, conduits Recording Date: May 6, 1540 AS SHOWN HEREON -ACCESS IS AVAILABLE ( ) BASIS OF ELEVATIONS: NAVD 1988 by Floyd Surveying. Recording No: In Book 460 Page 475 Official Records END OF EASEMENTS ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON GPS OBSERVATIONS FROM TWO NATIONAL 2) Any changes made to the information on this plan, without the written consent (EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD) GEODETIC SURVEY C.O.R.S. REFERENCE STATIONS: 1) PIN1, ELEVATION of Floyd Surveying relieves Floyd Surveying of any and all liability. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY = 4129.76' AND 2) TORP, ELEVATION = 103.77' WITH GEOID 2012 ITEM #5. - Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below CORRECTIONS APPLIED. 3) These drawings & specifications are the property & copyright of Floyd Surveying and rights incidental thereto as reserved in ❑ document; & shall not be used an any other work except by agreement with the Surveyor. SITE DATA SHEET NUMBER: REV.: Written dimensions shall take preference over scaled & shall be verified on the job Reserved b The Desert Club Y site. Any discrepancy shall be brought to the notice of the Surveyor prior to FEMA FLOOD ZONE DESIGNATION: National Flood Insurance Program: Purpose: Utilities and incidental purposes commencement of any work. Recording Date: March 4, 1946 County: RIVERSIDE Effective Date: 8/28/2008 Recording No: In Book 733 Page 221 Official Records (EXACT LOCATION IS NOT DISCLOSED OF RECORD) Panel: 06065C2241G 4) Field survey completed on AUGUST 12, 2015. The Flood Zone Designation for this Site is: ZONE: X PROPERTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION TITLE REPORT NOTES FEMA FLOOD ZONE INFORMATION GENERAL NOTES OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: THIS DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS IN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF SMARTLINK, LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR OTHER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF SMARTLINK, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS UNLESS THEY HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IN WRITING. TC3 58�33 11"48' �11110111111i, � Bc 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE szel BUILDINi 1ST FLOOR F IRVINE, CA 92618 0 2 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ti ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED l i k CITY OF LA QUINTA �, /SKATE PARK " l/ ARM 770-184-011 �� s ran a rt n 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE BC SWs. SUITE 400 5E 71 55.88 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 BC ss.7n J x 4 X X LP LP 91,2e SWS _SW X X X X X X X 85.63 X X X X X X I 56 36 TW 5 BC5 62.97 56.43 55.10 X PS3 BC5 55.35 I Q 56.36 LEGEND X LIP3 56.92 These standard symbols will 2 11-16-15 LEASEAREA FNCP SW5 PS4 PS4 be found in the drawing. 63A5 56.93 56.15 55.71 PSS P BUSH FNCP 56.76 to ELECTRIC BOX 1 9"16-15 TITLE REVIEW - /DOG AREA ��- 6293 o IRRIGATION VALVE - LIGHT POLE 0 08-16-15 SITE SURVEY GATE / PROPOSED CENTER OF SECTORS O FOUND MONUMENT / i SIGN REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION d TREE DECIDUOUS PROPOSED EQUIPMENT AREA TREE PALM BC LIPLIPS LIP3 56'87 LIPS _W UTILITY POLE � WATER METER FLOYD 57,31 62.56 SIPS 5638 N 89'30 18 E 55.21 BC BOTTOM OF CURB SURVEYING 10.00' ELTR ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMER BC LIP' 57,32 TC6 PC POINT OF BEGINNING 57_._13__1 EQUIPMENT AREA----_BC6 TC657.27 BC656 LIP4 56,78 56.42 58.05 PS2 55.52 LIP4 55.22 EP EDGE OF PAVEMENT FL FLOWLINE CURB & GUTTER FNCP FENCE TOP 34006 GALLERON STREET TEMECULA, CA 92592 OFFICE: (949) 200-0626 - TC6 57.03 LIP LIP OF GUTTER EMAIL: fsI®floydsurveying.com 37926' ------ E - asap i LP LIGHT POLE TOP N 8806'05" - N 00'29''3.00' NG NG GROUND SPOT ELEVATION -------- --------- FNCP ice ' _ j 56,68 flu FNCP P o 6259 N PS PAINT STRIPING SW SIDEWALK TC TOP OF CURB y 57g1 62.95 56,89 10./00' �^ BC6 56.43 BC2 56,39 TC6 56,82 TW TRTP TREE TOP DECIDUOUS David A, ni X X X X X X S 89-30'18" WJ TC5 56.78 6299 TRTP2 TREE TOP PALM - - - TW TOP OF WALL 5D TC7 56,81 EP6 S 89'48'30" W 741.43' ELTR2-78-080 TRTP s8.o4 TRTP2 FL7 56.31 RTP2 56,43 BOUNDARY LINE 8418 TRT12 1oa.a1 7558 BC2 5550 - CENTERLINE CA TC4 TC8 TC7 56.62 ERG -.56 TC5 56.00 MISC. PROPERTY LINE 5722 101,37 56.67 FL7 56.14 d 56.05 - I - - - - - - - - - MISC. TIE LINE PROJECT INFORMATION: BC2 RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE CHIHUAHUA LIP7 FIE 56.33 5647 FL8 56,14 LIP7 56.17 55.91 EASEMENT LINE 78060 FRANCIS HACK TC8 56.82 FL7 56.04 TC7 56.56 X FENCE LINE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY LEGEND SEE ITEM #10 OF PTR ACCESS POINTS FRANCIS HACK LANE DRAWNBY: CHECKED BY: N 89'4e3O" E 508.29' - - - - _ _ - 1) This is not a boundary survey. This is a specialized topographic map. The - - - property lines and easements shown hereon are from record information as noted DAF DAF hereon. Floyd Surveying translated the topographic survey to record information using the two found monuments shown hereon. No title research wasperformed SHEET TITLE: by Floyd Surveying. 2) Any changes made to the information on this plan, without the written consent�1 of Floyd Surveying relieves Floyd Surveying of any and all liability. TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY 3) These drawings & specifications are the property & copyright of Floyd Surveying & shall not be used an any other work except by agreement with the Surveyor. SHEET NUMBER: REV.: Written dimensions shall take preference over scaled & shall be verified on the job site. Any discrepancy shall be brought to the notice of the Surveyor prior to commencement of any work. 4) Field survey completed on AUGUST 12, 2015. L S 2 2 DETAIL SITE PLAN SCALE:7=. GENERAL NOTES OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS: THIS DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS IN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF SMARTLINK, LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR OTHER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF SMARTLINK, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS UNLESS THEY HAVE THE APPROVAL OF THE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IN WRITING. ADJACENT PROPERTY APN: 773-184-020 ZONING: RC F1 1 I OVERALL SITE PLAN PROPERTY LINE N 89°55'10" E 167.98' I SUBJECT PRO �I APN:770-184.011 V al ZONING: PR Do 0 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS UNASSIGNED PARKING STALL EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT AND ANTENNAS AREA, SEE ENLARGED AREA PLAN (go EXISTING PARKING o M` PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 100A METER PEDESTAL o 46`ti EXISTING HIGH VOLTAGE 96 TRANSFORMER *78-080 56 'I o 4') o L EXISTING RESIDENCE (TYP.) ADJACENT PROPERTY ZONING: MC EXISTING COVERED AREA PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 12'-0" WIDE NON-EXCLUSIVE PATH OF ACCESS —EXISTING WROUGHT EXISTING EXISTING IRON FENCE COVERED AREA COVERED AREA EXISTING WOOD UTILITY POLE LL #1200570 AND PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS TELCO P.O.C. (2'x3' HANDHOLE AT BASE) EXISTING — 30'-0" FROM CENTER I BUILDING LINE OF PROPOSED LL MONOPALM TO PROPERTY LINE F F—F—F—FF—FJ 0 S PROPERTY LINE 89°48'30" W 741A FRANCIS HACK LN PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS UNDERGROUND POWER TRENCH (±70') FROM METER PEDESTAL TO EQUIPMENT AREA — EXISTING PALM TREES, TYP `439'-2 11 f 9 lo .i.. EXISTING ` RESIDENCE a , : (TYP.) 0 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS - UNDERGROUND FIBER ROUTE (±400') I IN 5y'-0" WIDE UTILITY EASEMENT - J 32".W SCME: 1- _ 40' 11•M7" cur: V - W 11 20' 0' 40' ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT verizonJ THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smrtlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 ZL02/05/16 REVISED PER PLANNER COMMENTS ZL01/20/16 PHOTO SIMULATIONS ZL 12/14/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION ZL10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION ZL. 10/01/15 100%ZONING DRAWINGS ZL 09/03/15 90%ZONING DRAWINGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJ R CHECKED BY: J B PROJECT INFORMATION: CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: OVERALL SITE PLAN SHEET NUMBER: REV.: A-1 F N, Y OF IHE LICENSED PHOFESSIONAL IN WHIIING. EXISTING WROI GATES TO BE RI ON THE RIGHT EXISTING GATE PLAN EXISTING SWALE EXISTING WROUGHT IRON DOUBLE GATES TO BE RELOCATED HERE - 1 A-s PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS \ 60'-0" HIGH MONOPALM PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION TO MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB L: AROUND PROPOSED MONOPALM n_. 2T-0" MIN. SETBACK EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED ' EXISTING SWALE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS I I ' EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN CABLE TRENCH (±20') PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 17"X30" ' I ' UNDERGROUND PULL BOX LOCATED WITHIN EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCE ' - z - - ' 10'-0" OF MCE CABINETS WITH (2) SEPARATE 3" CONDUITS (1) TO EACH MCE CABINET 2 2 EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS i F - F�F�F FF-F-F F F- 100A METER PEDESTAL PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS I F�F-F F - - UNDERGROUND POWER TRENCH (±70') - - - - - - FROM PROPOSED METER PEDESTAL TO EQUIPMENTAREA ' ' �PROPOSEDVERIZONWIRELESS UNDERGROUND UTILITY FIBER TRENCH ' w ' (±400') FROM EXISTING WOOD UTILITY POLE #1200570 TO EQUIPMENT AREA E E E-E-E-E E-E-E E-E-E E E-E-E E E PROPERTY LINE S 89.48-7 W 741.43' ♦ " EXISTING LANDSCAPING & IRRIGATION TO BE w - REPLACED AS NECESSARY (3 TH) (40' BTH) �� PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 100A PPC w �\ Z �\ MOUNTED ON UTILITY H-FRAME �/) / EXISTING HIGH VOLTAGE w -_�- � EXISTING WATER VALVES TRANSFORMER #78-080 w �� ^ r 1���� � TO BE RELOCATED I \ EXISTING PALM TREE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED (MIN. 36' BTH) EXISTING SIGN J Lx w LANDSCAPED PARKWAY I EXISTING CURB PRO POSELIVE PLM BT REE EXISTING PALM TREES, TYPTYP. OF w 1 A 4 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS UNDERGROUND EXISTING STREET GUTTER SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS POWER ROUTE (±110') FROM EXISTING UTILITY w POLE #108113 TO PROPOSED METER PEDESTALS w N w w FRANCIS HACK LN 1 ENLARGED AREA PLAN 22",34'SCALE 1/4 - 11'xi J" SCALE: 1/8" - 1'-0" 3' Z' 1,p" «rr... w.,•r EXISTING SWALE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT PLAN 1 A2 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS 15 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 QF 02/05/16 REVISED PER PLANNER COMMENTS QE 01/20/16 PHOTO SIMULATIONS QD 12/14/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION QC 10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION QB 10/01/15 100% ZONING DRAWINGS QA 09/03/15 90% ZONING DRAWINGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJ R CHECKED BY: J B PROJECT INFORMATION. CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED AREA PLAN SHEET NUMBER: REV.: A-l.l F REIN. AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE. ARE THE PROPERTY OF SMARTLINK. LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED. IN WHOLE OR IN PART. FOR OTHER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF SMARTLINK, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DR' EXISTING SWALE Q / PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CABLE TRENCH (±20') EXISTING SWALE e I I ¢ I I I I I ¢ 1 1 PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION ' I (MATCH IN KIND) I ¢ I ' ' I EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED ' Q ' AND REPLACED SEE A-3 e c z wET I --�--1 t- -- -- -- I C I I IEXISTING CURB TO REMAIN PROPOSED VERIZON I °P _ WIRELESS MACRO CELL EQUIPMENT CABINET PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION TO BE REPLACED AS NECESSARY (MATCH IN KIND) EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCE � o - 0 O a io PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS a UNDERGROUND POWER ROUTE (±70') FROM PROPOSED METER PEDESTAL TO EQUIPMENT AREA PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 100A METER PEDESTAL MIN. d E [E4 E- PROPERTY LINE — EXISTING HIGH VOLTAGE w TRANSFORMER #78-080 s'-0 z w x w w i ENLARGED EQUIPMENT LAYOUT I F I F-F F-F-F F F-F-F- PROPOSED VERIZON I I NIRELESS MACRO CELL EQUIPMENT CABINET 4'-0" (3'-0" MIN. CLR) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS F —JEV UNDERGROUND UTILITY FIVER TRENCH (±400') FROM EXISTING WOOD UTILITY POLE #1200570 TO EQUIPMENT AREA PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 17X30 UNDERGROUND PULL BOX LOCATED WITHIN /w 10'-0" OF MCE CABINETS WITH (2) SEPARATE PROPOSED VERIZON I 3" CONDUITS (1) TO EACH MCE CABINET WIRELESS 54 GALLONS STAND-BY DIESEL / GENERATOR w � I PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS / 100A PPC, MOUNTED ON PROPOSED UTILITY H-FRAME E—E E E— E� — — — J PROPERTY LINE / 4'-2" 10.1 EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED, SEE ze 5'-6" PROPOSED VZW CONCRETE PAD 10'-0" N VERIZON WIRELESS LEASE AREA / 22`.17 SCALES / . — i'_ c' 1® ,Arm IV THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS 15 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861_2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 QF 02/05/16 REVISED PER PLANNER COMMENTS QE 01/20/16 PHOTO SIMULATIONS QD 12/14/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION QC 10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION QB 10/01/15 100% ZONING DRAWINGS Z 09/03/15 90% ZONING DRAWINGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJ R CHECKED BY: J B PROJECT INFORMATION. CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED EQUIPMENT LAYOUT SHEET NUMBER: REV.: A-2 F J OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE. ARE THE PROPERTY OF SMARTLINK. LLC AND ARE NOT EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCE EXISTING SWALE LANDSCAPED ISLAND O O O O O O O O O O O O v �, tD z � x �^ � w J J Y a F I EXISTING vat DOG PARK ID z I I Iw I I EXISTING WROUGF T IRON FENCE i I w r-I E E- E E EXISTING v LANDSCAPE Z C �/ 2 ENLARGED AREA LAYOUT PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 60'-0" HIGH MONOPALM z PROPOSED CONCRETE CURB g AROUND PROPOSED MONOPALM zz 0 9 N a > u PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION, o p SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS g PROPOSED LIVE SHRUBS, a SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS Fb EXISTING SWALE PROPOSED LIVE SHRUBS, SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS EXISTING CURB TO REMAIN PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION TO BE REPLACED AS NECESSARY (MATCH IN KIND) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS EQUIPMENT AREA PROPERTY LINE i PROPOSED LIVE SHRUBS, SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS PROPOSED LIVE PALM TREE, TYP. OF (2) (MIN, 36' BTH), SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS EXISTING DRIVEWAY- PROPOSED LIVE SHRUBS, SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS N 22".34' SCALE: 3/8' = V-D' 11"x17' SCALE: 3/16" - V-0" 1 1 ENLARGED ANTENNA LAYOUT PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 60'-0" HIGH MONOPALM PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS (4) PER SECTOR, (3) SECTORS, TOTAL OF (12) ANTENNAS, MOUNTED ON PROPOSED MONOPALM PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS RRU'S +A2 RADIOS, (4) PER SECTOR, (3) SECTORS, TOTAL OF (12), MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS SURGE SUPPRESSOR TYP. OF (2) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED MONOPALM A"SECTOR @ 110. PROPOSED VERIZON ANTENNA N 22"x34" SCALE 1/2" = V-0" 11"x17" SCALE: 1/4" - 1'-0" V THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS 15 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 QF 02/05/16 REVISED PER PLANNER COMMENTS QE 01/20/16 PHOTO SIMULATIONS QD 12/14/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION QC 10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION QB 10/01/15 100% ZONING DRAWINGS Z 09/03/15 90% ZONING DRAWINGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: Wi R CHECKED 8Y: J B PROJECT INFORMATION. CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: ENLARGED ANTENNA & AREA LAYOUT SHEET NUMBER: REV.: A-3 F AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF SMART. SMARTLINK. LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DR,' PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS (4) PER SECTOR, (3) SECTORS, TOTAL OF (12) ANTENNAS, MOUNTED ON PROPOSED MONOPALM PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS RRU'S +A2 RADIOS, (4) PER SECTOR, (3) SECTORS, TOTAL OF (12), MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS SURGE SUPPRESSOR TYP. OF (2) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED MONOPALM PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 60'-0" HIGH MONOPALM — PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 54 GALLONS DIESEL STAND-BY GENERATOR EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 100A METER PEDESTAL EXISTING HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSFORMER #78-080 1 1 SOUTH ELEVATION PROPOSED TOP OF PROPOSED TOP OF MONOPALM FRONDS MONOPALM FRONDS ELEV. ±60'-0" AFG ELEV. ±60'-0, AFG PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNA CENTER ANTENNA CENTER ,oB i.Ili uii . — ELEV. ±53�0" AFG ELEV�+53 0 AFG — I: "illi : lii piI IIpill I III 1 iiP I PROPOSED LIVE PALM TREE, TYP. OF (2) (MIN. 36' BTH), SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 100A PPC MOUNTED ON PROPOSED UTILITY H-FRAME TOP OF STAND-BY GENERATOR ELEV. ±7'-0" AFG. PROPOSED LIVE SHRUBS, SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS, TYP. !!! EXISTING CONCRETE CURB TO REMAIN FINISH GRADE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS SURGE SUPPRESSOR TYP. OF (2) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED MONOPALM PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 60'-0" HIGH MONOPALM — PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS (4) PER SECTOR, (3) SECTORS, TOTAL OF (12) ANTENNAS, MOUNTED ON PROPOSED MONOPALM PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS RRU'S +A2 RADIOS, (4) PER SECTOR, (3) SECTORS, TOTAL OF (12), MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS PROPOSED LIVE PALM TREE, TYP. OF (2) (MIN. 36' BTH, SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCE TOP OF STAND-BY GENERATOR _ ELEV. ±7'-0" AFG. TOP OF MACRO CELL CABINET r ELEv. +6 -a AFG. WISH GRADE EXISTING WROUGHT IRON DOUBLE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CONCRETE LEV. V-0" REF. GATES TO BE RELOCATED HERE CURB AROUND PROPOSED MONOPALM 2 1 WEST ELEVATION PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CONCRETE EQUIPMENT CONCRETE PAD PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS (2) MACRO CELL EQUIPMENT CABINETS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 100A PPC, MOUNTED ON PROPOSED UTILITY H-FRAME PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 54 GALLONS DIESEL STAND-BY GENERATOR —EXISTING HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSFORMER#78-080 PROPOSED LIVE SHRUBS, SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS, TYP. — THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS 15 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 QF 02/05/16 REVISED PER PLANNER COMMENTS QE 01/20/16 PHOTO SIMULATIONS QD 12/14/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION QC 10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION QB 10/01/15 100% ZONING DRAWINGS QA 09/03/15 90%ZONING DRAWNGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJ R CHECKED BY: J B PROJECT INFORMATION. CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: SOUTH & WEST ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: REV.: A-4 F --D HEREIN. AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF SMARTLINK. WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF SMARTLINK, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DR' PROPOSED TOP OF MONOPALM FRONDS ELEV. ±60'-0" AFG PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNA CENTER_ ELEV. ±53'-0" AFGiM -?1 irr H 1 i PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 100A PPC MOUNTED ON PROPOSED UTILITY H-FRAME TOP OF STAND-BY GENERATOR ELEV. ±7'-0" AFG. TOP OF MACRO CELL CABINET ELEV. ±6 -8 AFG. PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CONCRETE CURB AROUND PROPOSED MONOPALM GRADE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS (4) PER SECTOR, (3) SECTORS, TOTAL OF (12) ANTENNAS, MOUNTED ON PROPOSED MONOPALM PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS RRU'S +A2 RADIOS, (4) PER SECTOR, (3) SECTORS, TOTAL OF (12), MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS SURGE SUPPRESSOR TYP. OF (2) MOUNTED ON PROPOSED MONOPALM PROPOSED LIVE PALM TREE, TYP. OF (2) (MIN. 36' BTH) SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 60'-0" HIGH MONOPALM PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 54 GALLONS DIESEL STAND-BY GENERATOR (BEYOND) PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS (2) MACRO CELL EQUIPMENT CABINETS EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 100A METER PEDESTAL EXISTING HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSFORMER #78-080 AND PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS POWER P.O.C.-1 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS (2) MACRO CELL EQUIPMENT CABINETS II PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 54 GALLONS DIESEL STAND-BY GENERATOR PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 100A PPC MOUNTED ON UTILITY H-FRAME PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS 100A METER PEDESTAL EXISTING HIGH VOLTAGE TRANSFORMER #78-080 ---1 PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNAS (4) PER SECTOR, (3) SECTORS, TOTAL OF (12) ANTENNAS, MOUNTED ON PROPOSED MONOPALM PROPOSED TOP OF MONOPALM FRONDS ELEV. ±60'-O" AFG PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS RRU'S +A2 RADIOS, (4) PER SECTOR, (3) SECTORS, TOTAL OF A / .^ �n (12), MOUNTED BEHIND ANTENNAS HIII PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS ANTENNACENTER r � pp 6�y li r p' Jl�il ELEV.±53'-0�AFG -' 11. II AN` I, Lem Till -� --- Lul PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS SURGE SUPPRESSOR TYP. OF (2) MOUNTED -- ON PROPOSED MONOPALM —PROPOSED LIVE PALM TREE, TYP. OF (2) (MIN. 36' BTH), SEE LANDSCAPING PLANS _ PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS //_60'-0" HIGH MONOPALM TOP OF STAND-BY GENERATOR EXISTING WROUGHT IRON FENCE ELEV. CA IN AFG. TOP OF MACRO CELLL CAB ELEV. ±6'-8" AFG. T -- FINISH GRADE PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CONCRETE / `PROPOSED LIVE SHRUBS, SEE PROPOSED LIVE SHRUBS, SEE CURB AROUND PROPOSED MONOPALM LANDSCAPING PLANS, TYP. LANDSCAPING PLANS, TYP. EXISTING CONCRETE CURB TO REMAIN PROPOSED VERIZON WIRELESS CONCRETE CURB AROUND PROPOSED MONOPALM 1 1 NORTH ELEVATION 2 1 EAST ELEVATION THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS 15 PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 QF 02/05/16 REVISED PER PLANNER COMMENTS QE 01/20/16 PHOTO SIMULATIONS QD 12/14/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION QC 10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION QB 10/01/15 100% ZONING DRAWINGS Z A 1 09/03/15 90%ZONING DRAWNGS REV. I DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJ R CHECKED BY: J B I PROJECT INFORMATION. CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: NORTH & EAST ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER: REV.: A-5 F --D HEREIN. AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF SMARTLINK. WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF SMARTLINK. LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DR' POINT OF CONNECTION: LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATION OF EXISTING MAIN LINE AND TIE PROPOSED VALVES INTO MAIN. CONTROL VALVE TO BE 12' ABOVE HIGHEST HEAD - SEE DETAIL. LOCATE ALL EQUIPMENT IN PLANTER AREAS - SHOWN FOR CLARITY ONLY. IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY EXISTING STATIC WATER PRESSURE AND TO NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY DISCREPANCY. FAILURE TO DO 50 MAY RESULT IN CHANGES TO THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO THE OWNER. CONTROLLER LOCATION: CONTROLLER IS BATTERY OPERATED. LOCATE CONTROLLER ON INSIDE OF REMOTE CONTROL VALVE BOX. FINAL LOCATION TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR TO MAKE FINAL HOOK-UP OF FIELD WIRES. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE A. IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO: ROUTINE INSPECTION. ADJUSTMENT AND REPAIR OF THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM AND ITS COMPONENTS. REMOVING OBSTRUCTIONS TO THE EMISSION DEVICES. REPAIR OF ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT SHALL BE DONE WITH THE ORIGINALLY INSTALLED COMPONENTS OR THEIR EQUIVALENTS. B. PLANTING MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT LIMITED TO: REPLENISHING MULCH. FERTILIZING. PRUNING. HEEDING ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. SPECIAL MONITORING OF THE SPECIMEN PINE TREE WATERING PROGRAM AND MAINTENANCE OF GUYING. INSPECTION NOTE PRIOR TO ANY LANDSCAPE INSPECTION, THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL COMPLETE A FIELD INSPECTION TO VERIFY THAT THE LANDSCAPE AND IRRIGATION INSTALLATION IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED DESIGN PLANS. AFTER THE INSTALLATION HAS BEEN DEEMED IN CONFORMANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL SUBMIT A CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE LETTER TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND SCHEDULE A CITY LANDSCAPE INSPECTION. WATER USE CALCULATIONS: PROJECT LANDSCAPE AREA: 444 SQUARE FEET THIS PROJECT IS LESS THAN 500 SF. AND IS THEREFORE EXEMPT FROM A51WI (MWELO) MODEL WATER EFFICIENT LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE. L IRRIGATION PLAN THIS nnrllMFNT AMC THE IDFAp ANn DFSIrNC NM, FRANCIS HACK LN IRRIGATION NOTES: 1. ALL WORKMANSHIP AND MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL BUILDING AND PLUMBING CODES HAVING JURISDICTION, AND PER THESE PLANS, NOTES AND DETAILS. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE OF MANUFACTURER AND MODEL AS SPECIFIED, UNLESS APPROVED IN ADVANCE IN WRITING BY THE PROJECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES EXIST, CODES SHALL PREVAIL. ALL IRRIGATION PIPES, VALVES AND WIRING ON PLANS UNDER PAVED AREAS OR HARDSCAPE ARE SHOWN SCHEMATICALLY. INSTALL PIPES, VALVES AND WIRING IN PLANTING AREAS WHEREVER POSSIBLE. 2. PROTECT EXISTING SYSTEMS AND ALL PROPERTY FROM ANY DAMAGE FROM THIS WORK 3. WORK PERFORMED UNDER THIS CONTRACT SHALL INCLUDE FURNISHING ALL LABOR MATERIALS, TOOLS, MACHINERY, NECESSARY TO INSTALL A COMPLETE IRRIGATION SYSTEM, INCLUDING TRENCHING, BACKFILLING, ETC. INTENT OF THE SYSTEMS IS TO PROVIDE A COMPLETE READY -TO -USE AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM, FULLY OPERATIONAL AND GUARANTEED, WHICH PROMOTES VIGOROUS AND HEALTHY PLANT GROWTH, WITHOUT FURTHER COST TO THE OWNER 4. PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID, EXAMINE THE SITE AND CONDITIONS THEREOF, WITH THIS PLAN. S. PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK, ARRANGE A MEETING WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, CITY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, OWNER'S REF'IRESENTATIVE, OR DULY APPOINTED REPRESENTATIVE. 6. PLAN IS DIAGRAMMATIC. LOCATE ALL VALVES IN SHRUB / GROUNDCOVER AREAS ONLY. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND TO EXIST DURING INSTALLATION BETWEEN THESE PLANS AND THE SITE, NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH THE WORK T. ALL MATERIALS SHALL MATCH EXISTING, OR BETTER INDUSTRY STANDARD, AS APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. S. ALL PLASTIC FITTINGS SHALL BE INJECTION MOLDED SCHEDULE 40 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE AND SIDE GATED. 9. INSTALL ALL WORK PER APPLICABLE IRRIGATION DETAILS IN THIS SET OF PLANS. 10. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF THESE MATERIALS WITH ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS TO AVOID INTERFERING (IE: PLANTING OF TREES AND SHRUBS, ETC.). 11. TRENCHES SHALL BE EXCAVATED TO PROVIDE DEPTH OVER PIPE AS NOTED PER LEGEND. BACKFILL FOR TRENCHING SHALL BE TO A DRY DENSITY EQUAL TO THE ADJACENT UNDISTURBED $OIL, AND SHALL CONFORM TO ADJACENT GRADES WITHOUT DIPS, SUNKEN AREAS, BUMPS, OR OTHER IRREGULARITIES. ACTUAL BACKFILL ON PLASTIC LINES SHALL BE OF FINE GRANULAR SOIL MATERIAL WITH NO FOREIGN MATERIAL LARGER THAN 1/2' (05') IN SIZE. 12. THE INSTALLATION SHALL BE DEEMED INCOMPLETE UNTIL ALL EQUIPMENT HAS BEEN CHECKED AND ADJUSTED TO BEST CONFORM TO THE CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF THE FINISHED SITE, AND APPROVED AS -BUILT PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED. PROVIDE A FULLY IRRIGATED LANDSCAPE WITH A 100% OVERLAP AND MINIMUM OVERSPRAY ONTO ADJACENT PAVING AND STRUCTURES. COORDINATE IRRIGATION HEAD AND PLANT REPLACEMENT FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE TO ALL PLANTS (SEE ADDITIONAL NOTES IN 'PLANTING NOTES' SECTION.) ADJUST SPRAY PATTERN, SPRINKLER HEAD POSITION AND LOCATION AS DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO ACHIEVE THESE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. 13. ADJUST THE FLOW CONTROLS OF THE VALVES, WHEN APPLICABLE, AND ADJUSTABLE FLOW HEADS AS FOLLOWS: FULLY OPEN ALL ADJUSTABLE HEAD FLOW CONTROLS. ADJUST THE FLOW OF WATER AT THE VALVE TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PRESSURE AT ALL HEADS IN THE SYSTEM. ADJUST THE FLOW CONTROL ON ALL HEADS UNTIL DISTRIBUTION 19 EVEN AND COVERAGE IS 100% FOR THE LANDSCAPED AREA WITH A MINIMUM OF OVERSPRAY ONTO HARDSCAPE AND NON -IRRIGATED AREAS. 14. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN THE IRRIGATION INSTALLATION FOR A PERIOD OF NINETY DAYS (9O) MINIMUM FROM OLLNER'S ACCEPTANCE. CLEAN AND ADJUST SYSTEMS TO SATISFACTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE. 1r, THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE ALL IRRIGATION MATERIALS AND WORKMANSHIP, INCLUDING LABOR FOR ONE (1) FULL YEAR FROM OLLNER'S ACCEPTANCE. MANUFACTURER'S WARRANTIES SHALL NOT REPLACE THIS GUARANTEE AND THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE LIABLE FOR REPAIRS AND REPLACEMENT OF FAILED MATERIAL. E/T IRRIGATION LEGEND SYMBOL MFG MODEL NO./DESCRIPTION ❑ RAIN BIRD RWS-M-5-C-1402 ROOT WATERING SYSTEM WITH 1402 BUBBLER (050 GPM) - 2 PER TREE (NOT RAINBIRD XBT-IO-PC EMITTER ON RISER FROM LATERAL LINE. REFER TO DRIP EMITTER LEGEND. SHOWN) 0 RAIN BIRD PE15-100 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE - 1'. ►1 WILKINS "S50 FULL PORT LINE SIZED BALL VALVE. (NOT RAINBIRD I RI RA POLY FLEX RISER/ADAPTER WITH XERI-BUG XB-10PC-1032 EMITTERS AND PC SHOWN) DIFFUSER CAP. REFER TO DRIP EMITTER LEGEND. (NOT RAIN BIRD AR VALVE KIT (AIR RELIEF VALVE). INSTALL PER DETAIL. SHOLLN) (NOT RAIN BIRD FLUSH VALVE. INSTALL 1/2' BALL VALVE AT THE END OF EACH SCH. 40 PVC RUN. SHOWN) — — — — — LATERAL LINE FOR DRIP, PVC SCH 40, BURY MIN. 12' BELOW GRADE. 3/4' AA HUNTER NODE-200 2 STATION BATTERY OPERATED IRRIGATION CONTROLLER INSTALL IN VALVE BOX AND CONNECT TO R51000 WIRELESS RAIN SENSOR PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. FINAL LOCATION TO BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. NON -PRESSURE LATERAL SC 4 40 PVC, BURY MIN. 12'. SIZE AS INDICATED ON PLANS. 3/4' MINIMUM. SYSTEM FLOW IN GPM VALVE SIZE AI STATION NUMBER • NOTE: CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPUTE EXACT FLOW BASED UPON FINAL PLANTING. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOT EXCEED SPECIFIED VALVE CAPACITY IN TERNS OF MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDED FLOW VS. FRICTION LOSS SPECIFICATIONS. DRIP EMITTER SCHEDULE I. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL RAINBIRD XB EMITTERS TO MEET THE FOLLOWING SCHEDULE: ALL I GALLON - (U XB-IOPC-1032 (I GPH EACH) ALL 5 GALLON - (2) XB-IOPC-1032 (I GI EACH) 15 GALLON - (3) XB-IOFC-1032 (I GF'14 EACH) 24' BOX - (4) X15-10PC-1032 (I GPM EACH) 2. THE NUMBER OF EMITTERS INDICATED ON THESE PLANS ARE APPROXIMATE AND SHOULD BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD BASED ON PLANTING INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO PLANTING PLAN AND DETERMINE EXACT NUMBER OF EMITTERS REQUIRED BASED ON EMITTER SCHEDULE ABOVE. NOTES: CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL ALL IRRIGATION EQUIPMENT WITHIN LIMIT OF SITE WORK SHOWN FOR CLARITY ONLY - IRRIGATION IS SCHEMATIC. ALL LATERAL LINE AND MAINLINE INSTALLED UNDER AC PAVING TO BE PROVIDED WITH PIPE SLEEVING (2 TIMES LINE SIZE). �J verizon✓ 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE BUILDING'D, ISTFLOOR IRVINE, CA 92618 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VEROON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 Al2/03/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION A10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION 10/01/15 100% ZONING DRAWINGS AA 09/03/15 90% ZONING DRAWINGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJR CHECKED BY: JB Landscape Architects 1/ Villamoura Laguna Niguel CA 92677 (949)661-3998 - rjc1a0sbcgloba1Pet �pNDSCRp �E�r punning o� qPn Signature 08/31/16 * Renewal Dote 12/09/15 s Dote P T DTPOFCALW' PROJECT INFORMA TION: CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: IRRIGATION PLAN SHEET NUMBER: REV.: L-y ROVAL OF THE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IN WRITING. FRANCIS HACK LN PLANT LEGEND SYM BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE QTY. REMARKS PHOENIX DACTYLIFERA DATE PALM 36, B.T.H. I BROWN TRUNK 36, B.T.H. I SIZE AS NOTED ON PLAN 42' TALL SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS © LANTANA 'GOLD MOUND' YELLOW TRAILING LANTANA I GAL. 66 PER PLAN LEUCOPHYLLUM FRUTESCENS REGAL MIST PINK MUHLY 5 GAL. 4 PER PLAN PLANTING NOTES I. REPLACE ANY ROCK MULCH THAT HAS BEEN DISTURBED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION. ROCK MULCH TO MATCH EXISTING. 2. PALMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM: WD. YOUNG AND SON SI-SI0 ARUS AVENUE INDIO CA S2201 T60-34T-1906 WEED CONTROL THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PER=00 I A THOROUGH WEED ABATEMENT PROGRAM, KILLING AND REMOVING ALL WEEDS FROM THE SITE AND SHALL BE COMPLETED PRIOR TO THE ADDITION OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. THIS SHALL BE DONE FOR ALL PLANTING AREAS, SPECIFICALLY, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, SLOPES AND GROUND COVER AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW THE FOLLOWING STEPS: I. KILL AND REMOVE ALL EXISTING WEEDS. 2. IRRIGATE ALL AREAS TO BE PLANTED FOR (2) WEEKS. 3. KILL AND REMOVE ALL NEWLY GERMINATED WEEDS. 4. REPEAT STEPS 2 AND 3. 5. PLANT SHRUBS AND PALMS. SOIL TEST AFTER SOIL HAS BEEN SET IN PLACE AND PRIOR TO ANY SOIL PREPARATION, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH SOIL TESTS OF THE S1TE FOR AGRICULTURAL FERTILITY AND TO DETERMINE PROPER SOIL AMENDMENTS. TESTS ARE TO BE PERFORMED BY A MEMBER OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF AGRICULTUTRAL LABORATORIES IWTH COPIES SENT TO THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SOIL PREPARATION THE FOLLOWING 15 PROVIDED FOR BID PURPOSES ONLY AND SHALL BE MODIFIED AS NECESSARY GIVEN THE RESULTS OF THE SOILS TEST. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE PREPARED TO PROVIDE DELIVERY SLIPS AND EMPTY FERTILIZER BAGS ON SITE FOR VERIFICATION OF MATERIALS. I. BAC<FILL MIX FOR USE OF PLANTING ALL SHRUBS. S PARTS BY VOLUME ON S1TE SOIL 2 PARTS BY VOLUME OF ORGANIC AMENDMENT I LB. 12-12-12 COMMERCIAL FERTILIZER PER CUBIC YARD I LB. IRON SULFATE PER CUBIC YARD OF MIX 2. PLANT TABLETS FOR ALL SHRJBS: 4-21 GRAM AfiRIFORI"I FERTILIZER TABLETS PER 15 GALLON STOCK PLANTING PLAN I I SCALE: 1-10--- 11 THIS 11111WINT III 111 11111 111 I IIIINO llll: ....ATFlI HFRFIN AC AN INCTRIIM FNT lI, PRf)FFCSI fINAI CFRVIII ARF THE/11/1111 11 1M11TI INK I I I III ARF NIT TO 11 11111 IN W111 F OR IN PART FIR ITHFR IRI,IIIII WITHII IT THE WRITTFN 111111111111/11 11 CMARTI INK I I I IT 11 I INI AWFIII II)R ANY 1'1111N M IIIIIII ANY 111111 11 11111 IIRAWINIS WI TIOl IT THE API verizonN/ 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE BUILDING 'D', 1ST FLOOR IRVINE, CA 92618 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY & CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THAN AS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 Al2/03/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION A10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION 10/01/15 100% ZONING DRAWINGS AA 09/03/15 90% ZONING DRAWINGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJR CHECKED BY: JB RJCLA Landscape Architects 11 Villamoura Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 (949J 661-3998 - rjcla®sbcglobalnet VpNDSClp �E�r punning o� qPn Signature 08/31/16 * Renewal Dote 12/09//5 s Dme P r DTPOFCAOF PROJECT INFORMATION: CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: PLANTING PLAN SHEET NUMBER: REV.: L-2 RIVAL OF TI-.= I SECTION maim IRRIGATIdy 6YSTEn PARTI- GENERAL A Thie sect onn tM Nrnlahinga maer of all s per ,T,, III 'pcetw rovide laa to paevapl¢te op -able landscape rrlgat w;nIt-. a• 1 w M drawings meWding ens rollawing: L Tr¢td,utg. eto � IliNg arc tea ma,wlal> and rorilling I,_. 2. brigat eye pwmn iI1 d,,g but not limited o: piping, backrlow pre on derides end'djo t valves, fining.. . •pray Maas, t 1. .parse, wiring ana feral adJ 6-ta ea aalarminsd bytt,a 3r PIP, !o Insure eI, P,,M and Oviform dl-VlbuLion. 3. Pipe mecuoA o pump atatlona, water meters end backfiaw ,rev-uon devlde.co 4. Pa ,g ana Irmpec or Irngat on system. 5. Glaen-up 'end maintenance B. The conditloru of tM Contract end Division I apply to Wes .action a• fully a• If repeated h_ein. 1ID GENERAL RE4LIREnENTS A coda t• et, a b. tMLe or sw,e ana nwml aI coeaL and mauom locally go�voar'ning this work providing tMt ary regWram_a or tM Drewin� d °6 Ificatlw., no! ewfllcting therewith but eidn exceeding t,e by Coda I, a shall govern, -lane written pemie,o tM cwvery le granted lM Architect. B. Conform to thitequlrem of lM reference Infometdn haled below a cept where more atelrg .quo- are slows I,at •ph- In I. moat cwrmrt net or cwnvuctiw aom.n�t-iL I. American Socixy for tasting Material (ASTM), ror teat methods spedncally rafw-led in then .salon. 2. IMtl_writ_'e Labwaton¢e I-,, for uL wire- and cable•. c. Work Involving eub•tantw plimmng for IAtal tat- of copper piping, backflow prevention devices and I- rotated work at, II be executed by a ucenaed end bonI- plumbing contractor. Any nacea.ary permit• •hall ba omalnsd Fiw to _sTrI rig work D. 6pamnad depth or preaawa -apply liw,, lat_ala and pitch or pipes as aeaeed In Mb newt- era minmum.. 1.tuananL foor trwlchas lower ,Mnagrad.s ap mood on ,M 'coal grading plane e a r r-ioval of N. gr de vaatmeM, refilling vsr,cna., recwrpectirg end reps Nng or nmM grade vseimaM. E. Follow w..wt printed menufecturerb apecificatloA and dM-9, for Items or Infwmallon not .peciflad or grapMcally Inds- in M. moat cur-t eel or conetrucuon drawinga. F. Scaled dimes -ions are approximate aria It times it I. not pee-lbl. to Indicate offeata, orange and other related aquipmeM grapMcelly on the construction erawmcg-. c itt Mau , reepomrole ro mlror dargae caused by a ,al dot N IIII dl procamding with any l tM Contractor shell fully dreck and verity all Tth I ieione -Ill r.la,ad arclli,ectural slam-t., utinuea and lerdacapmg et, ILrniah entl Imtell required nulrga. G. Do ne tall tiv lrrigat on eyatem a shown on tN¢ can on a-,",wMr It III obvious 1M1 actual flail condition•. .ucM1 ae. physical ob.tructiws, grading eleer.p�aneiea end field dim -alone vary hom Moe¢ remrdee en et, eerotruetlw drawing . Immadiatelyobring any aucM1 diecrapenwea to tM aumnuw or t,a architect Frio o p deeding. wit, work If immediate rotificaiion i- not and sucM1 dlacropanclea exist, lM contractor atoll asswna NII roapwaib111ty for setae-ary r.vi-lone, a• dntemined by tM architect. BD Ex15TING FIELD GONDITION6 A Ra._Ve at, protect ell axiating tree., plant., mwvnem.e, structweL, herd -cape and archltact-I slam-t- hem damage due to work in thle a In tM even! oat damage aoa• occur to Inanimate o IiAt and atructuras, the iwill repalr w replace axh damage o LL. ea,isfection of the own_ or re. a Damage or Injury to Ilvmg plant materiel will be minced by tMtaconvactw at tM cwvac!«a axpeme. B. Trenching or oth_ wwk raq Iced In LHI. eactiw wdm tM Ilmb spread of sung tree> Mell be now by Mrd or by Otto' methods >o ae to prevent damages or corm to nmb., brendn. and root.. O Trsrching in area. wh-a root diamat- exceed. 2 Inches Mall ba law by hand. Exposed roots of t,le size Mall be MMly--1 Negmo vd a_nngor w burlap to 1. opwe,ed In p' ml[y to root• iMt era lase tMn 2 IricMe, lM wall of tM v-ch elan be land dimmed , maWng c can wta though roots. D. Treneil.e adjacent to I, wd_ azletlrg erase shell be eloeed within 24 Mows , and when this ie rot poesibla, tM aide or ­1cloeael to t- tree or trans affected elall be toyed w1M moi.terrecl bun.,. E. Rolecl, malnlwn and wwdlnal, work wIth I- convect., spec Vatlea, and utilities.. ExVane care shall be axerci.ed in sting aindlworking in t,a wee due Lo esrelirg util I, Convawor-... 11 be aepoAibla ror damages .uused by stoic aperet one. In tM avant W t damage does occur, tM aoa cM1 rap re site I ba pald by tM coMrawor -less wMr wrergem-le Mva a hew made with !M owner. F. use caution where tr_icl'na and piping 1-11. exi rg .a .... eld.iialk-, lardacap., path w curb•. In tM oven! Use lama ga doss occ r, tM cornractor wrll '.pal LueH damage at tM eoneraetor s 4ID REQUIRE, DODUMENT6 A ^wbmitta is I. 6ubmlt (6) six .rte of all Irrigation aqulpni-t to be w¢a, mamfactwer'e brodvr.., s-vice mama I•, guarani ., and op -a gg rvct we for approval t,, the architect pr r to begiming work nsubm�llala Mould be In a bowl corm complete with lab). or eonteait.. TM eoMraeior et, ll not pnoeeea with work In tM neid wen Min aubmiltal Ie approves in 111 livery by lM architect. 6ID MAINTEN E A TM re int-erica period I, Ircigatiw et, 11 begin I- a cartificata of completive I.. prov dad by ,M architect to tla own_. B. Tha Convector .MII warrant mat_Ial• against deFacls and guareMea workm.-hip ror fM period epemned wd_ tM maTMewnce agraem TM Contract- •fall be ra.poneibs for roordlwtlrg w 'rant, It • with mamracwr_)d1>-11 aw owwr. C. 5.ttlem-t or tr_cMa whicM1 may o during !M mwM-node p_Ioa will ba rapalraa bJ tM contractor at no axp-ea to LM ­ D, Repaid required due to verdell>m before the end of Uri maintenance period .111 b. performed at t,s contractor , exp-• E. Riw to a relera.a of rsepveelbility at !M mid of LM malnlenanea peNod, tM eonvaeew •toll eelgdule a .elk tlreugh wit, t,a ¢user or er. rapraswiativeard dlawooe and provde un rouowmg: I. Gxrwt wet-og sclndulerraqulr err• 2. Two (2) Late tM requi ed tool• ror ranovirg,'Il..s.mbling. and adjwting each type o w aprirdclw Mad, end electric conrol va Iva Four use(4d on ,M projec 3, Two r(4 keys f each control)_ unit. 4. ) quick coup)- kayo and malching swiv,,le for .adt type of quick coup)- used on tM project. PART 2 - PRODUCTS 20 PIPING G-_el Piping: A. Pipe size• Mown are nomlMl IAlde aiamel_ -lase oiMrwlae nolee. i. Pipe shall be IdaMified wIM tM following indelible merWnge: a)Marefactw-cons b) Nominal papa. nixes c)5clndule or clans. d) Rae.ure rating e) NSF (National 5anl lion Foundaelon) eml or approval. f) Data of axtru•iori.� I. Non-Reaaure Linea: (do-aveem of electric remote control valve) PVC Cla.e 200, coMorming 2. to ASTn DI185-83. Fittings; S, wegNt , 6cha�le 40, injection molded PVC, complying wit, A- OF. 84 Ili D2466, cell claeelficailon 11454-15. C. Thaaa>- Injection molded type r.h-s r.qw ..) I. Tees at, Ella- aide gated 2. leraad.d Nlppla•: A6 D2464, 6cledule E0 wit, molded LLreade. D. Joint Can-i and Rlmw: Type a. racomm-led by manufactww of pipe: and rixurge. A Manuractwed of flexible vinyl chloride compound conforming to 6TM D2855M. D360 afd 1I599. b) Filtingn: Type end make an recommwtled by tubing menutacturw. E. ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVES 1. El, c Remote Centro) Va Ives: As spa .- IT drawings, F. VALVE BOxE5 I. I.olallw Ball Valvm, FIU1, Valve ALLamblim, Flow 6-sore, Growling Roan, CammwicaUw came Splices. ana Wire Splices: Carew 910-12. 2, Elaclric Control valvaa, Drip Valve A­IIIi Maat_ Valvaa and Manual Dra In Valves: Carson a146-BB. G. AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER UNIT I. -tic Controliw wW I. epemned on des 'gas R ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE WIRE L Lew Voltage: 2. ALLG OF UL nd approved No. 14 direct bwlal c ppa w e fw all convol wl aNa. 14 bur direct ial c.pp- wire for all A— wl- 3. Wire Colon: al Control Wire,- Red. c) common wo-aL- ,tone. )Master Valve Wires- Blues. d) 6para Wraa- Grew (labeled at t-minelicn) 4. Wra Still- Camectore: RalMird Pwute Comectora or approval aqua 1. PART 3 - ._E TION 30 PREPARAtICN A Examine field c.nditiwe priw to begimirg work daewibed in t,ie eactiw. Grading aperatiwa .toll ba completed at, approval priw lc bsgiming work B. Vdify ell dare locatlona poor to beginning work In I— sectiw. Flag all ring elaevseane cordull. Installed by otter trade•. Report ary conflict. and drodrepanclee to the architect __,,I C. Irrigation >yatam atoll be corotructed to tM sizes and grades at tin loceuon. shown on ins drawinga. D. Install alssvea, to accom A.- p1pa. and wheat under paving, Mfaacapa sidewalks, and Fella priw tI ..,Halt and conwele op_a ompac backfill around aleevea to %% Modified Roctor D_sity within 1% of optimum L moletwe comets In accordance wit, ASTn 0I551. E. EXCAVATION AND BACK FILL OF Tlill 6 4ID TrmCi excavation shall ae much ea pos.ibla follow t,a layout Mown on tM drawing-. FIAT atoll be evaigM in alignm-e and wppwt pipe continuou.iy w bottom or trench Remove -- and .-I. great- than i' In dfametw. Ova excavate a. require) fw bedding mat_lal. A Dept, of Tr-ch tin Iand.cap. areaeA 1. PN> Supply L1ne: 16' nor top of pipe to rmlM grade. 2. control Wiring: do-ectly at side end -tam of pre -tire supply Iiw. B. Depth or n-d, rwd_ asphalt paving w concrete): I. Rseewe Supply Line: 24' hom top of pipe to aggregate bass. 2. Non-Rd>ure Liw: 24' nor top r pipe 1. egreg a base. al Rping located order a>pMit paving or co A,- sMII be Irotalled with tM approprlel,, aizad •leave at, back fill with •and bedding below pipe and 6' above pipe) ti) Compact back fill mat -lei In 6' lift. at 90% mexlnNm d-ally determined in eccwdance with ASTM DI551 uelrg manual w melamcal tamping dIm. 3. Set IT, place, cap, es rid Free s test piping in LM prseerce of ,M owns ar ownw'a rapreawt ve prior to beck fell. C. 1Ndt, of Trench: I. Pipe Great_ than 3': 1 t. mi l-I 1. Pip. Lase tMn 3': 1' minimum, D. WidtN betwew Trend-aa: 1, lrrigat wcn to lrrigat 2. Irngat ve Trench and Otto' Trade Tr .:m12m minimum. E. Boring: Bwmg will only be pemlttad -Mrs pipe moat pee• undw an ob.e , Mat demo, be avoided or rem Back rill atoll match rounding eon awslty at, green. Boring uM- axiaung paving, s1cla.alke, or tore, r p may I. p-milts It contactor a own ri-k con ie .sponeible for any repairs or aamege to euUt Items It ,Mir own experoeaclw F. Back f111: Back fill of Vw 1 may not be done until all required taeurg for tM lrrigat on <yelam ML ba.- completed. G. Material: f Excavated mat-lal la gm -ally ddnaid-ad to be adequate I fw backnll op_a, one. Berwe beglmirg !M back fill operation, ineire tbackfill wlal Mee Rom dabrla and rock• grey - tMn I' it and 1• not mixed with topsoil. lheea ma,_lale aft- eapara[md hom back fill,ll, shil1 be legally dleposed of et convectors expwae. H. Beddlrg: Bed preen-¢ .apply I - .It, coroVuction grad. send 6' above and 6' halo. pipe. RemaMmo back fill may ba a. deswibed above I. Bad all electrical control wire at, commwicauon cable.ire, A -mreour ar I. pa eyoply line, wit, coAtructive grade Bandd w 6' above and batbelow wlrea 2. W-en back fill, allgMly mound filled tr- ror eet,lement alto back rill le compacted. Compact back nil to a :msa maximum III, a cordence with ASTM DI- with a madanical tamper. Do not leave rencli¢a open for a panod grealw tMn 48 hows. Open trw.lchee Nall be protected In accordance unto current OSHA regulation•. 3, Smooth tr.ncFes !o 1In grade prior to requ.elifg a walk t, ,91, rw eubatantlal oompeuan wit, the architecC. 5m POINT OF CONNECT10J(5) A. POIM of connection atoll be appr at, p.o zimatelV a. 9M.n on drawings. Correct wdarg.owd. piping end valves. ids all flanges, adapts s, or Otto' setae ary ri tinge. B I1,16TALLATION OF iIOLVENT JELD POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) 1. des Iyvlryl cM `IwdeF pipe Mall ba tit wiu, an approved Pve pipe cutter gn ony purpo>e. 2. All plastic-u-ple.tic aelvw, weld jelnie Melt use only the eoly-t acomme by the pipe marufactwar. Do not Install .01-1 weld pipe when tarpeNture. IL below 40i F. 3. Pipe ands and fitting• atoll ba wiped with M1, w approved equal, before welding eo a applied. Welded Joints et, 11 be given a minimum of 15 comma• to .eeweerore moving or Mnming. a. Pipes shill be .raMd hom Aida-lo-•des on I— bottom to allow for exp.A end cenvacuero. 5. All dmi,e- of direction ov_ 15 degree• Mall be made with appropriate ntting•. 6Wen pipe layl,S is not 1. progreea at tM end of each worung day, clone pip. and..", tight plug or rap. 1. Install pressure supply line locating tap,, elwg tM enure Iwgth of ,'¢saws supply Iln a. coordiMle F-A,'..pp1y line wI..and bedding op_ e. & No wM_ Nall ba F-ni - In tM pipe wn11 IApectI= have ba- completed aria a period of at lease 241qura Ms eiapeed ror ,Divest weld .stung at, curing. 0. Cants load pipe with small amowt or back rill to prevent arching and .11PP wd_ pr.eawe. Leave Joints exposed fw mapecuon during t,hig, C. ELECTRIC CONTROL VALVE5 I. Ineta ll each electric control valve in a aepara ve box eo t,at cross Mndle I. 3' min. below valve box coven a. epecifled on Vm detail drawinga. 2. Coup elecvic control valve• to91,h a• epeclfled on LLB drawine. allowing a maximum or 12 ' bstwsw ch valve box. Install valve boxes n t,s .am. dVectlon and parallel with one anolMr and p_p_dlalar io paving, Mrdacape,.16-1l1. end patM- D.vALVE BOxES I. Install valve boxes with Bach type of Irigation aquipmanl so IT lop of valve box Is above flniM grade ae epeclried w tm detail drawing.. aNe box exlwslwe are not acceptable except for m,.tw valve• and mama) d�a1n valvaa. 2. Plata gravel Lunp below and around aeGT valve box prior falling valve bo as spec find on tM drawings. Place remalning pwtiw or gra n.lda valve box allowing NII access. In and scowl all fltLlig.. Valve box e atoll be fully aupportad by gravel §amp. No brick or wood support- are allowed. E. AUTOMATIC CONTROLLER I I. V-Ify electrical power at location of automatic cwvoll_ unit prior to lalAtlw of aulomauc co-oll- unit. Nollfy architect Immadlataly If pow- newts le not avalleble. 2. Hardwire control)_ to t,. o ff switch and .,:l��ngg pow_ source. Comroll.r Mau not ba plugged into socket provldad ror I- aqulpm-t. 3. Irota11 autameuc convoll_ unit wows aMwn on tra E. per manufaclur_e spacinmtiwe. Cwlroll_ Ntill be tested with complete po,iV to connections. the Contractor atolls re.ponaible rw temporary power to lM Corhroll- for operation entl lmtirg p ',Dena. a. Correct alectrlc a of valve and drip valve: ae.anbly wiring to cwtroli- unit in the Aare men-Ica1 ..queride a. indicated ITLL. drawing•. 5. correct flow .,I and cone!- valve wiring to cwtroll_ wit. 6. 1n.,e Il a Laparale ground wire for salt co 011I, unit ee eIR-Fled on ,M drawings. 1. Above ground Aw It Mall be rigid galvanized pipe with the aPpr F,i e stooge. Below ground conduit •hall be PVC SCH 4m pipe with appropriate fieung.. a. Label earn automatic coa,,Ilh, unit wit, ITT. Jett_ or ramb_ de.le a .o n ve drawing,_ LMtw of numb« -11 be loca,ea in a visible locative on LM Imide panel cov- with 3' high Nryl laltare. 9. Each automatic controllw unit sMll be complat,,ly operable priw to scheduling a walk tW 91, for .ub.tanlial completion. F. ELECTRICAL WIRE 1. Low voltage Wiring: 2. Bwy control wiring In .are tr-dr a• I—- supply Iiw a. •pacified. 3. -w all 24 volt wIr.. at 20Int_va tilt, alactrlwl taps. 4. Rovlds expansion loop: at .very ,renews supplyNPIline: angle nuifg, Aide each .i.ctr"Ith I le control valve box, drip aloe it -artily Iva A- and ., 25m' Iw Intervals alorg routing. F­ , I,. loop by wrapping w rs a minimum of m ura. around a 3(4' pipe and -,drawing pipe 5. Limit .pllcingoof electrical wiring. Rovide eerie splice made It Inl-vale and drip valve a--embly valve bexee wiW Ralnbird Peute co� ecto a or approved equal. 6. Wire splice occurring at Int-vats outalde electric canvol valve box and drip. valve aeeanbll.e atoll be Imtalled In a separate valve box. 1. Rovide 111,7 electrical control wire fw avmy slacvlc remote control valve and lve des>embly. Piggy bating 11ke zones on et, same sledriwl cvetrol wire 1• not allowed. a. Install (2) Iwo spars �4-I alactrlral contol wVsa nor tM eulomatic roller unit pea'. tat Lo lM last electric contol valve on sad., lag o pre a •goply Ilnae Locate tM spar wires In ,Mir own vale. box LFadlFled. In addition to LMes •par wire•, Gnat its drawinga fw any box I- aII I l wvee Vat may be required and locate them In tM name valve tM -pare wirm. _EGEND KEY 1 4' GRATE 2 RAINBIRD ROOT WATERING SYSTEM, (RWS) REFER TO LEGEND FOR FULL MODEL sr. 3 BUBBLER.REFER TO LEGEND. 4 FINISH GRADE. 5 CHECK VALVE. 6 PEA GRAVEL. INSTALL ALL AROUND, 7 1/2' SOLED. 80 PVC RISER. 8 1/2' MARLEX ELL. 9 SWING PIPE, 12' PIPE SWING ASSEMBLY IO 1/2' MALE NPT INLET II PVC SCHEDULE TEE OR ELL. 12 LATERAL LINE. 13 4' BASKET WEAVE CONTAINER. ON TAPE ON ALL SWING JOINTS. RIPLE SWING JOINTS WITH ALTERNATING MARLEX AND PVC SCHEDULE 40 STREET ELLS. I F(-FND KFY I GREEN PLASTIC VALVE BOX WITH 7 PVC SCH 80 UNION, LOCKING COVER MARKED 'RCV' 8 PVC SCH 40 FEMALE ADAPTER, 2 1/2' IN TURF AREAS, I" IN SHRUB 9 PVC NON -PRESSURE PIPE. AREAS. 10 PVC SCH 80 NIPPLE(LENGTH 3 CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT TO THE AS REQUIRED). ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL, PRIOR TO II PVC SCH 40 TEE (S S S) PURCHASE TYPE OF WATERPROOF OR ELL (S S) ON MAINLINE. CONNECTION THAT WILL BE USED. 12 CRUSHED ROCK SHALL COVER 4 PROVIDE TWO FOOT COIL EXPANSION AT EACH WIRE CONNECTOR IN VALVE VALVE BOX PIPE OPENINGS TO BOX AND COIL WIRES PREVENT SOIL ENTRY 5 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE. 13 PVC PRESSURE PIPE. 6 SOLENOID. 14 FINISHED GRADE NOTE: USE CLASS 315 PVC PIPE AND SCH 80 PVC FITTINGS FOR SIZE 2' AND GREATER. USE SCH 40 PVC PIPE AND FITTINGS FOR SIZE 1-1/2' OR LESS. CLOSE NIPPLES SHALL NOT BE USED O SUBGRADE BUBBLER O REMOTE CONTROL VALVE (D FINISH GRADE 0 EMITTER TO BE INSTALLED 3- ABOVE FINISH GRADE Q3 IT POLYETHYLENE RISER ® VT THREADED BASE O PVC SCHEDULE 40 TEE BURIED MIN. 6' BELOW GRADE © NON-PRESSLRE PVC LATERAL LINE DIMENSION A I IS I C II TO 3- IN SIZE 24- 1 8' 1 , OE DRIP EMITTER © PIPE INSTALLATION EGEND I. NON -PRESSURE PVC LATERAL LINE 2. COMPRESSION FLUSH CAP' INSTALL IN EMITTER BOX. 3. 10' ROUND GREEN PLASTIC VALVE BOX. TOP OF BOX TO BE EVEN WITH FINISH GRADE. 4. 2 CU. FT 3/4' CRUSHED GRAVEL FO FLUSH CAP FINISH GRADE CLEAN COMPACTED BACKFILL LNDISTLI28ED SOIL LATERAL LINES - SEE SPECIFICATIONS (D RAIN BIRD BATTERY O3 SOLENOID (TYPICAL) OPERATED CONTROLLER O4 REMOTE CONTROL VALVE O WATERPROOF CONNECTION (TYPICAL) (TYPICAL) © BATTERY CONTROLLER verizon✓ 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE BUILD/NI 1ST FLOOR IRVINE, CA 92618 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY 8 CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USE OR DISCLOSURE OTHER THANAS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 Al2/03/15 MONO -PALM RELOCATION IL 10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION 10/01/15 100% ZONING DRAWINGS AA 09/03/15 90% ZONING DRAWINGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJR CHECKED BY: JB Landscape Architects 1/ Villamourd Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 (949)661-3998 - rjcla®sbcglobalnet �P, oscAp Q_EC, punning o� qPn 5 o ti Signature 08/ ai/16 Renew I Dote * 12/09/15 s Dote P T �Tf OF CA LIF OR PROJECT INFORMA TION: CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: IRRIGATION DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHEET NUMBER: REV.: L-3 DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF SMARTLINK, LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN FREI,THER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF SMARTLINK, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL IN WRITING. PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS A.GENERAL lSco 'a of Work e. Contractor shall Nrnl.h all labor, material, land. and services necessno to Install all ds pe planting, as Indicated n the approved drawl and a, specified heroin and shall pnrormsa ll other ncidental —necessary to carry out the intent of this specification and drdwings including the following: I) Fine grading, soil preparation, planting of trees, slruba, in ves, ground covers and lawn, ta guying and sking tree,, and weed abatement. 2) one hundred -day maintenance. 3) Provide guarantee. I . All Irrigation work shall be approved by the Landscape Architect prior to any work In this _ec , being performed. 2. Agronomic Soil, Report a. Art- completion of rough grading and prior to sou preparation, the contractor shall provide the tine or planting soils, and compo.tad organic h,mua materla la by an independent agronomic son. testing laboratory (member or the California Association or Ag—Rural Labs), Representative soil sample- shall be taken in the led and a wrltter report >t shall shall be prepared by the loll ..'sa and Include recom.endatlons for eppITc tIons, preplant Fertilization, hgdromuld, alurry, and post -maintenance fert111-1c, Program, I,. Soil preparation specifications shall be prepared based on the teat results and recommendations and shall be approved by the Landscape Architect prior to .oil preparation. c. 5oi1 tests -hall be performed after soil preparation to confirm that Boll preparation was performed In compliance with preplan. sou. report and >pasc,nbatibra. Lana,cape 3. Protection of Existing Trees and Plants to Remain a. Contractor ,hall not store materials or equipment, penult burning, operate or park aquipmest under he branches of any exiting plant to remain. b. Contractor shall provide barricades, fnce. or other bar,ier. as necessary at tIr drip line to. protect existing plants from damage during construction. I. contractor shall notlry Landscape Architect in any case where Contractor reels grading or other on>tructlon called For by the plans may damage exiting plants. d. If existing plants to remain are damaged during construction, Contractor shall replace such plants or the lama spec and size as those damaged at at to the Owner. Determination or extent of damage end value or damaged plant shall rest solely with the Owner. value loss. will be calculated using the method established by the International Society of Arboriculture. Catnmin-dr, or whether to accept compensation through tree replacement or monetary settiamnt 'hall rest solely with the owner. 4. Substitutions I . Specific reference to manufacturers names and products specified . thl. Section are used as .tandard-= thi. ImplI.. no right to substitute other materials or method. without writtn approval or then Land,cape Architect I,. Installation and warrantof any approved substitution shall be contractors re.pon.Ibuity. Any chage, required For mstallatlon of any v daubetitutlon must be made to the . tTtlafaction or the Landscape Architect without additional coat to the Owner. Approval by the Owner of substituted equipment and/or dimn.lon drawings does not waive the,, requiremnta, 5. Submittals I. Prior to IretsiI.Mon, the Contractor shall submit to the Landscape Architect two copies of manufacturers (teratura, racalpt. of sale and laboratory analytical data For the Following Items! llkJrganlc Amendment. (2)fopsoll f3Kommer.1.1 Fntilizn 4 Muld, (5)Plant material b. Rarer to irrigation specification for additional submittal requirements. 6. Product Handling a, Contractor shall Nrnlsh standard product, in raifacturer's standard containers bearing orrgmul labels showing nm, quantity, analysls, and 'amor nul-ract=, All otaus bags at,,, c shall remain on sit, unto work is completed. b. contractor shall notlry Landscape Architect 1 days prior to delivery of plant material and submit it-1.alln of plant. in each delivery. 1. clean Up a, con completion If each phase of work under this Lion time cont ractor tractor .hamve .hall clean up and reo from the are. au unused materials and debris aulting from performance the perfoance or the work The alte shall -dean be left In a broom condition, and wash down au paved area. wehin the project site. Leave walb in a clean and safe cndltin. IS. PRODUCTS I. Plant Material e. All pant. aha.11 be or the size, variety, see, and conditin as shown n the drawings and as specified herein. I'. Quality I) Plants shall be In accordance with the California State Department of Agriculture's regulation for nursery Inspections, rules, and gr ding. Root. shall be sufficiently developed to the pnimetar of the root ball to hold the root ba together, but should not display roots of 1/4' diameter or larger, vi,ib le on the perimeter or the root ba II. The root ball shall be Free of roots V5 the trunk diameter vlalbly circling the trunk, and free of roots protruding above the soil. n the avant or dt.agra ndition of mot system, the root conaittonaof the, plant. furnished by the contractor In containers will be determined by ram val of earth from she roots or t less than two plans or each specor ariety. iLhne container grown plants are from ­ssra sources, the root, of not lees than - plant. or each species or variety from each source will mple be inspected. In case the saplants Inspected are round to be defective, the Landscape Architect reservee the right to reject the entire lot, or Iota, or plants represented by the defective ...plea. I. Plants shall be true to special and variety in accordance with the American Association of Nurserymen Standards. Eadi group or plant material. delivered to the site .hall be clearly Iab,led as to .paclao and variety and nursery e. There aha 11 be no aub.titution or plant. or .ize> for those 11.ted n the accompanying plan. except with approval of the Landscape Architect. r. container stock shall have grown in the container. in which delivered for at least I. month,, but not over two year.. Samples .hall ahow no root - bound conditlona. container plants that have acked or broken ball. or earth when taken From container 'hall not be planted except upon special approval by the Landscape Architect. g. Plants not conforming to the requirement. herein placiFlad well be considered detective and such ants, whether In pace or not, will be marked a. rejected, Contractor shall immediately remove rejected plant. Rom the promises and replace with new acceptable Plante at his expanse. 2. Topsoil a. Soil to be used a. planting medium For the project 'hall be futile, well drained, of uniform quality. Kee of atones over 1-inch dametn, .tick,, oils, dhemical,, plasm, concrete, and other deleterious materlaIs. b. Imported topsoil shall be From, sources approved by the Landscape Architect which meet the standard. specified above. c. The Contractor shall provide For the testing of propo.ed topsoil by a certified agronomic soils testing laboratory and shall submit soils nelyel., recommandatlons and topsoil sample to thr Landscape Architect for approval. Import topsoil shall not be delivered to the sit. riot to Landscape Architect approval. The Landscape Architect may request additional teasing of imported toPaoil at the site to determine conformarce to the. app owed report. Rejected topsoil shall be removed at no cost to the Owner. IF If .sockplling 1. requested, locations and amounts of stookplle small be approved by the Owner. 3. Soil Amen l.— and Fertilizer Recycled material, small be used unless unavailable or cost prohibitive. a. Provide standard, approved and firer -grade quality materials, In Prime condition whn installed and cepted. call— commercially processed and packaged material and manuracturar'a guaranteed nalysis. Supply a ample or all supplied materials a companied by analytical data from an approved laboratory source illustrating ompliance, or bearing the menuracturer's guaranteed analyst, to the Landscape Architect. d. Soil Amndmelts V 5o11 sulfur - Agricultural grada sulfur taming minimum of Se percent sulfur (expressed as .lemma U.. 2) Iron sulfate 20 percent iron (expressed at IT Iron), derived from ferric and ferrous sulfate, 10 percent sulfur (expr... ad as elements l), 3) calcum carbonate - 95 percent rim, a, derived from oyster shells. 4) Gypsum - Agricultural grade Product coma lning SO percent minimum calcium sulfate, 5) Dolomite lime - Agricultural grade mineral oil conditonn containing 35 percent .1mmum magnn carbonate and 45 per minimum ra I,= carbonate, 100 paseing No. 65 IT* all provide Kaiser Dolomite 65 AG or other approved. 6) Fine and - Clean, natural fine sand Free From deleterious materlal, weed seed, clay balls, rock with minimum or SS percnt passing a No. 4 >leve and m ximum of 10 percnt passing a No. 100 .I eve. a 73711IFT7 V Fertilizer shall be polleted or granular form consisting of the percentage by weight of nitrogen, phosphoric acid and potash as recommended by the approved agronomic report. Plant ng fertilizer shall be mixed by the commercial fertilizer supplier. 2) Plant tablets -shall be slow release type with Potential acidity of not more than 5 percent by weight. 4. Pesticides and Hnbcides a. All chemicals used for weed control shall be registered by the State or California Department If Food and Agriculture and the Environmental Protection Agency with registration Identiricatlon on the label. Label shall be at job site at all times. b. All chemlcal> shall be applied as per registered label Instruction and manufacturer. recommendatlons. c. Chemicals requiring a licensed applicator must be applied by person. regi.terad with the County or Riverside Department of Aricu—lid, qualified Commisaloner ,m Office as pos ea t, lid, qualified peat control applicator a Iliicense. I. The use or any restricted materla le Is forbidden unless a special use permit Is obtained From the. County of Riverside Department of Agriculture. e. The nonselective, trenslocative herbicide shall be 'Roundup' or approved equal. C. ExECUVCN OF WORK I. Gemara a. Perform .cruel planting only during those Ill what weather and soil condition, are suitable and In accordance with Iocally accepted practice. I, Confirm location and depth of underground utilities, and ob.Vuctlons. If underground structures or utility line, are encountered In the vation of planting areas, other locations For planting ,hall be approved by the Landscape archRedt. c. All planting layout and ataking shall be accurately made In accordance with the plan.. All trace shall be a minlmum Or 3 Feet from Mprovamnt unless root barrier 1. installed. d. Ill. location. shall be approved by the Landscape rch(tect prior toe ,tin and are subject to ,pacing and dlatances required by city standards. ,. Planting Holes Planting Fnlee anal have irregular, rol lazed .Ides, and aha ll bee minimum of three time, the diameter, and one and one-half times the depth or the original plant contalner. 2. Planting of SMub. and Groundcov a. Shrub' and Groundcovnaha ll not be allowed to dry out before or w1,11e being planted. Roots shall not be exposed to the: air except while actually being placed in the ground. Wilted plant, will not be accepted. I. Plant In straight row. —amly spaced, and at Intervalsrequired by drawing,, use triangular spacing. I. Plant sad, rooted plant with Its proportionate plantior flat so11. Immediately water attar ng until entire area 1, soaked to Full depth of each hole. d. Protect plant. from damage and trempill at all e. Topdreea all groundoover and shrub areas with 2- inch layn or approved bark mulch. PALM TRUNK 4REFER TO DETAIL B) 6 HGH WATERING BERM BACKFp.-L TO BE 100% CLEAN NI.RSERY SAND FINISH GRADE IRRIGATION BUBBLER REFER TO IRRIGATION DETAILS FOR INSTALLATION OF BUBBLER ROOT BALL PLANT TABLETS COMPACTED SUBGRADE FILTER FABRIC 17 DIM. X V DEER SUMP FLED WITH U2 GRAVEL 4' DIM. PERFORATED PVC PIPE WITH CAP. NOTES- CONITRACTCR SHALL PLACE PALM TRUNK IN EXACT CENTER OF TREE WELL. REFER TO ROGATION PLANS TO COORDNATE INSTALLATION AND NUMBER OF RRIGATKXN BUBBLERS LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO APPROVE FINAL Hl AND LOCATION OF PALM PRICK TO PLANTING REFER TO SPECIFICATIONS FOR FE12TLZB2 12EGUI12EMENTS OA PALM PLANTING TOTAL HEIGHT MEASURED AS SHOWN © PALM TRUNK HEIGHT II verizoW 15505 SAND CANYON AVENUE BUILDING 'D', 1ST FLOOR IRVINE, CA 92618 THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS SET OF DRAWINGS IS PROPRIETARY 8 CONFIDENTIAL TO VERIZON WIRELESS ANY USEOR DISCLOSURE OTHER THANAS IT RELATES TO VERIZON WIRELESS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED smartlink 18401 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 400 IRVINE, CA 92612 TEL: (949) 861-2201 FAX: (949) 387-1275 12/03/15 MONO —PALM RELOCATION 10/14/15 POWER ROUTE REVISION 10/01/15 100% ZONING DRAWINGS ZA 09/03/15 90% ZONING DRAWINGS REV. DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION DRAWN BY: WJR CHECKED BY: JB Landscape Architects 1/ Villamoura Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 (949)661-3998 - rjc1d0$bcgloba1Pet �P, DSCAp �E�r punning o� qPn 5 0 W o n n Signature 08/31/16 * Renewal Nit 12/09/15 s Dote P 'I OF CA LIF OR PROJECT INFORMA TION: CHIHUAHUA 78060 FRANCIS HACK LANE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 RIVERSIDE COUNTY CANDIDATE NAME: FRITZ BURNS PARK SHEET TITLE: PLANTING DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS SHEET NUMBER: REV.: L -4 DOCUMENT AND THE IDEAS AND DESIGNS INCORPORATED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF PROFESSIONAL SERVICE, ARE THE PROPERTY OF SMARTLINK, LLC AND ARE NOT TO BE USED, IN WHOLE OR IN PART, FOR OTHER PROJECTS WITHOUT THE WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION OF SMARTLINK, LLC. IT IS UNLAWFUL FOR ANY PERSON TO AMEND ANY ASPECT OF THESE DRAWINGS WITHOUT THE APPROVAL ED PROFESSIONAL IN WRITING. ATTACHMENT 4 Smart ink Verizon Project Name: Jurisdiction: Date Application Filed: Type of Application(s): Site Address: Permit Application(s) #: Authorized Agent for Verizon Wireless Chihuahua City of La Quinta September 29, 2015 Conditional Use Permit 7810o Francis Hack Lane, La Quinta, CA 92253 Verizon Wireless is filing a complete permit application for a new wireless telecommunication facility in accordance with your code, ordinances and regulations. In filing this application Verizon Wireless expressly reserves all rights federal and state law including, but not limited to, having this application processed to a final decision without undue delay in accordance with the Declaratory Ruling o9-99 issued by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) on November 18, 2009. Unless Verizon Wireless received written notice from you within thirty (30) days of the filing of this application, this application shall be deemed complete pursuant to Paragraph 53 of the FCC's Ruling. If you believe this application is incomplete, you must specify all missing items in writing to Verizon Wireless at the address below. Please send all information relating to this application to: Contact Name: James A. Rogers Company Name: Smartlink LLC Authorized Agent for Verizon Wireless Mailing Address: 18401 Von Karman, Suite 400, Irvine, CA 92612 Respectfully sub iYies A. Rdg&s- Land Use Specialist Smartlink, LLC Authorized Agent for Verizon Wireless RECEIVED SEP 2 9 2015 CITY OF LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT @smartlink Authorized Agent for Verizon Wireless Verizon Project Name: CHIHUAHUA City of La Quinta, CA Application for Conditional Use Permit Project Description and Project Justification The Applicant (Verizon Wireless) is requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction of a wireless tower and operation of an unmanned wireless telecommunication facility. The following project information is provided for your consideration. Project Location Address: 7810o Francis Hack Lane, La Quinta, CA 92253 APN: 770-184-011 Zoning: PR (Park and Recreation) Project Representative RECEIVED Name: James A. Rogers/Smartlink, LLC Address: 18401 Von Karman, Suite 400, Irvine, CA 92612 SEP 2 9 2015 Contact Information: 949-295-9031 Verizon Wireless Contact CITY OF LA QUINTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Name: Jeannie Le, Project Manager Address: 15505 Sand Canyon Avenue, Bldg. D, Irvine, CA 92618 Contact Information: 949-286-8137 Proposed Project Description Verizon Wireless is proposing the construction of an unmanned wireless cell site. Verizon Wireless is proposing the construction of a 6o-ft high antenna support structure disguised as a palm tree (MonoPalm). The proposed MonoPine will have a three (3) sector antenna array of twelve (12) panel antennas, twelve (12) RRUs + Az radios, and two (z) surge protectors. The Verizon antenna array will have a centerline height of 53-feet, with the Palm fronds Page 1 of 5 Project Description & Project Justification 9.29.15 extending up to a height of 6o-feet to screen the antennas, which will be covered with "antenna socks" to match the appearance of the fronds. The MonoPalm will be located within a 10' x 20' lease area along with two (2) macro cell equipment cabinets, one (1) standby diesel generator, and required telco and power connections. Access will be via Francis Hack Lane and the existing driveway with a non-exclusive travel path and parking area. Project Objectives and Project Coverage Verizon Wireless has determined that a radio signal strength of greater that 75 dBm is necessary to provide reliable and consistent voice and data services to customers both outdoor and in -building. Additionally, as nearby sites become overworked due to increasing voice and high-speed data services, new cell sites are needed to maintain coverage and to prevent new gaps in service. The Verizon radio frequency (RF) engineers have identified the need for a new cell site located in the City of La Quinta to improve coverage in the area. The primary purpose of the proposed cell site (Chihuahua) is to provide improved coverage and telecommunication services in the area between several existing cell sites, as shown on the accompanying radio frequency propagation exhibits. Due to high customer usage the existing nearby sites (La Quinta and SBA Parquinta) are currently performing at peak capacity. The proposed Chihuahua cell site location will provide the necessary footprint to improve in -building coverage in the residential, resort and commuter areas near the intersections of Avenue 52/Calle Sinaloa and Avenidas Bermudas. The propagation map demonstrating the Existing Coverage depicts all existing Verizon Wireless towers near the proposed site. Project Site and Compatibility with Surrounding Development The project property is located near the southeast corner of Francis Hack Park, north of Francis Hack Lane. The subject property consists of a single parcel of approximately 6.o acres developed as a Public Park. The property has two parking lots and access driveways located on Francis Hack Lane; the primary parking lot at the corner of Avenidas Bermudas and the secondary lot to the east of the dog park area. As shown on the provided Site Plans, the property is developed with a variety of recreational uses, including an aquatic center, lawn area, picnic and tot lot area, tennis courts, skateboard park and dog park. The surrounding properties and uses include: - North - Skateboard Facility and Tennis Courts A West - Dog Park and Parking Lot South - Single Family Dwellings - across streets and landscape areas East - Public Works Maintenance Yard and Fire Station Public Interest, Health, Safety, Convenience and Welfare of the City The proposed antennas will be mounted to a camouflaged MonoPalm pole adjacent to several existing Palm trees thereby minimizing its visual intrusiveness. The proposed project Page 2 of 5 Project Description & Project Justification 9.29•15 will meet all underlying City setback and development standards, and all setback and separation requirements for wireless facilities. The proposed location of the cell site has been selected to meet the objectives and requirements of the La Quinta Zoning Code, as well as meeting the radio frequency engineering project objectives previously described. Also, the proposed cell site will not affect or alter the present use of the property or of any of the surrounding properties and developments. The proposed cell site will substantially improve wireless telecommunication services, including voice, internet, data and E-emergency, in the surrounding developments, thus improving the general public interest, health, safety, convenience and welfare of the surrounding areas and the City of La Quinta. Alternative Site Analysis The original coverage search area was located west of Eisenhower Drive in the La Quinta Cove area. The La Quinta Cove area is developed as a single-family residential neighborhood, with no suitable candidates for a cell tower facility. The following alternate locations were identified and evaluated as potential cell site facilities. The reasons for not selecting the alternate locations are also addressed: Existing MonoPalm - City -of La Quinta Corporate Yard: This alternate collocation site is located on Francis Hack Lane, immediately east of the proposed cell site. This location was acceptable to RF Engineering for covering the primary coverage gap. However, the collocation was determined by Verizon to be infeasible from a land use entitlement viewpoint due to the poor stealth opportunities on the MonoPalm, and infeasible from a construction viewpoint due to the lack of adequate ground space for the required Verizon equipment. New MonoPalm -City of La Quinta Corporate Yard: This alternate site is located on Francis Hack Lane, immediately east of the proposed cell site. This location was acceptable to RF Engineering for covering the primary coverage gap, and was determined by Verizon to be feasible from a land use entitlement and construction viewpoint. However, the City intended to make renovations to the Corporate Yard to which the cell -site could potentially intrude. Therefore, the City was asking for a much higher rent for the location than what Verizon could agree in order to accommodate the potential intrusion. Thus, this alternate location was not selected. Required Findings of Approval The following findings shall be made by the planning commission and/or planning director prior to approval of any wireless telecommunication facility: Consistency with General Plan. The wireless telecommunication facility is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the general plan; Page 3 of 5 Project Description & Project Justification 9.29.15 The proposed Wireless Telecommunication Facility will provide communication services to the surrounding residential neighborhoods and travelers passing through the area. The proposed use therefore will provide increased emergency & safety communications, and strengthen the economic basis of the community. The property on which the proposed use will be located is developed as a Public Park, which consistent with both the General Plan and the Zoning designation. The proposed wireless facility is an allowed land use within the designation, with approval of the Conditional Use Permit and is therefore consistent with the General Plan. A- Public Welfare. Approval of the wireless telecommunication facility will not create conditions materially detrimental to the public health, safety and general welfare. The proposed wireless telecommunication facility use will provide enhanced communication services to the surrounding area, including emergency and public safety communications, and in -residence data, internet and voice services. The proposed wireless facility will be located adjacent to the existing Public Park facilities (dog park and skateboard facility) and the City corporate maintenance yard. The nearest residence is approximately 16o feet to the south, separated by two (2) public and private roads and a landscape buffer. Therefore, the proposed wireless facility will not adversely affect or be materially detrimental to the surrounding uses and buildings. The proposed wireless telecommunication facility minimizes adverse visual impacts through careful design and site placement; The proposed wireless facility utilizes zoo square feet of the 6.o acre Park parcel. The wireless facility is proposed as a "stealth" MonoPalm similar to others in the City of La Quinta. The MonoPalm fronds will minimize the visual impacts of the facility; while the proximity of existing live palm trees will provide f visual context and screening. Therefore, any adverse visual impacts of the proposed facility have been minimized as much as possible. The proposed wireless telecommunication facility is designed at the minimum height to achieve the service provides objectives for coverage within this portion of the community; The proposed wireless facility is designed to provide an antenna rad center of 53 ft., which is the minimum height identified by Verizon's radio frequency engineers as necessary to meet the coverage objectives of this site location. The 6o ft. height of the proposed wireless facility is consistent with the height of other carrier facilities in this portion of the City, and well below the maximum allowable height of ioo ft. Page 4 of 5 Project Description & Project Justification 9•29•15 A The proposed wireless telecommunication facility is necessary, as shown in the applicant's justification letter, to improve community access to wireless service. As described in the Project Objectives and Search Ring section of this letter, a significant gap in coverage and/or capacity exists for Verizon customers in this area of the City of La Quinta. Therefore, a new wireless facility is necessary to improve community access to wireless services. The enclosed land use application and exhibits are presented for your consideration. Verizon Wireless requests a favorable determination and approval of the Conditional Use Permit to build the proposed facility. Please contact me at 949-295-9031 for any questions or requests for additional information. Res ectfully submitted, -'� ames A. Ro Sers Land Use Speciali Smartlink LLC Authorized Agent for Verizon Wireless Page 5 of 5 Project Description & Project Justification 9.29•15 W, w U W Ir O N LO N L— E 4-0 ■ cu U1. 0 CV w QC C ^ i q .�in.•;F.,yi t i s H z W ■� W Z O C N = J V aj W �' w ga LL © - W `� it m 0 N m ' f�li lfM 7 i.All( � pr 41ff vA l�(.�Imf4i it ATTACHMENT 5 Jay Wuu From: James Rogers <james.rogers@smartlinkllc.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 6:03 PM To: Jay Wuu Subject: RE: CUP2015-0003 CHIHUAHUA - Update - Courtesy Letters Hi Jay, I received a phone call and spoke with Jim McComsey ( APN 770-280-012), one of the residents on Gato Drive. Mr. McComsey is not opposed the Verizon project, but had the following questions and comments: • Why isn't Verizon going.on tfe existing Monopalm:' — I explained that Verizon had originally looked at that location, but that it was determined that there was not adequate ground space for the necessary equipment, and that Public Works has plans for the improvement of the maintenance yard with which the Verizon facility could potentially interfere. • Noted that the Photo Sim (#6) view was from his driveway_— He does not have any issues with the views as his home and it views are oriented to the golf course. • He in uired as to the schedule for the Verizon site as he would prefer the work to be done over the Summer — I told him that hopefully the site will be approved by the Planning Commission at the end of May, and then filed for Building & Safety review in June. Construction could take place in August/September. • Early morning noise coming from the Public Worms maintenance yard is his biggest compliant — I told that Verizon could not do anything about that problem, but that I would pass his concerns onto the City. I will inform you if I am contacted by any of the other HOA representative or residents. Regards, smartlink James A. Rogers Smartlink (o) 949.861.2201 (m) 949.295.9031 (f) 949.468.0931 smartlinkllc.com Proud Sponsor of the Chesapeake Bayhawks, S-Time Major League Lacrosse Champions! www.thvbaxhawks.com This electronic mail (including any attachments) may contain information that is privileged, confidential, and/or otherwise protected from disclosure to anyone other than its intended recipient(s). Any dissemination or use of this electronic email or its contents (including any attachments) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is strictly prohibited If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by reply email that we may correct our internal records Please then delete the original message (including any attachments) in its entirety. Thank you.