CC Resolution 1997-012^!M* RESOLUTION 97-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-334 PREPARED
FOR CERTIFICATE OF APPROPRIATENESS 96-002
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-334
KIENER BUILDING
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 4th
day of February, 1997, hold a duly noticed Public Hearing to consider Environmental
Assessment 96-334 prepared for Certificate of Appropriateness 96-002; and,
WHEREAS, said Certificate of Appropriateness has complied with the
requirements of The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of
1 970" as amended) Resolution 83-68 adopted by the La Quinta City Council) in that
the Community Development Department has prepared an Initial Study EA 96-334;
and,
WHEREAS, the Historic Preservation Commission of the City of La Quinta,
California, did on the 21st day of November, 1996, at a regularly convened meeting,
recommend approval of the proposed Certificate of Appropriateness 96-002 for the
Kiener Building; and,
WHEREAS, the Community Development Director has determined that said
request will not have a significant adverse effect on the environment and that a
Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact should be filed; and,
WHEREAS, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments, if any,
of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said City Council did find the following
facts, findings, and reasons to justify recommending certification of said Environmental
Assessment:
1 The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness will not be detrimental to the
health, safety, or general welfare of the community, either indirectly or directly,
because of the design of the project which has been reviewed for health and
safety issues, for which none have been identified.
2. The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness will not have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife population resulting in a drop below self sustaining levels, reduce the
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, as
the project site has been developed since the mid-i 930's.
3. The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness will not have the potential to
achieve short-term environmental goals, to the disadvantage of long-term goals,
as the project site involves rehabilitation and seismic retrofitting of an existing
historic building.
4. The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness will not result in impacts which are
individually limited or cumulatively considerable, as the project site has been
developed since the mid-i 930's and will comply with La Quinta Municipal Code
Title 7 Historic Preservation Ordinance, the State Historic Building Code, and
the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan for preservation of local
historic resources.
5. The proposed rehabilitation and seismic retrofitting of the Kiener building and
shed are consistent with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the
Treatment of Historic Properties.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
La Quinta, California, as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the
Council for this Environmental Assessment.
2. That the City Council does hereby certify Environmental Assessment 96-334 for
the reasons set forth in this resolution and as stated in the attached Environmental
Assessment Checklist and Addendum, labeled Exhibit A".
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La
Quinta City Council held on this 4th day of February, 1997, by the following vote, to
wit:
AYES: Council Members Adolph, Henderson, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Holt
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* GLENDA HOLT, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
UNDRA L. JUHOLA. City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
DAWN HONEYWELL City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* EXHIBIT A
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
Environment*I Assessment No.96-334
Case No.:COA 96-002 Date:**(**
I.
Name of Proponent: Anne & Mike Fischer
Address: 77-895 Avenida Montezuma
Phone:
Agency Requiring Checklist City of La Ouinta
Project Name if app licable) COA 96-00- Kiener Building
CITY OF LA QUINTA
Community Development Department
* La78495 Calle Tampico
Quinta, California 92253
P**ESLIE\EC96-334
9
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* EARLIER ANALYSES.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR* or other CEQA
process, one or more effects have been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case a discussion should identify the following
on attached sheets:
a)Eadier analyses used. Identi* earlier analyses and state where they are available for
review.
b)Impacta adequately address. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within
the scope of and adequately analyzed by the earlier document.
c)Mitigation measures. Fbr effects that are potentially significant" or potentially
significant unless mitigated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or
refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific
conditions for the project.
P:\LESi*IE*C96.334 viii-
16
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* INITIAL STUDY ADDENDUM
FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-334
Certificate of Appropriateness 96-002
Kiener Building
77-895 Avenida Montezuma
City of La Quinta, California
ADDlicant:
Annie and Mike Fischer
2240 Yuma Way
Fullerton, CA 92635
PreDared by:
Community Development Department
City of La Quinta
78495 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
Associate Planner
December 18, 1996
17
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Page
1 INTRODUCTION 3
2 PROJECT DESCR[PTION 4
3 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS 5
4 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE 14
5 EARLIER ANALYSES 15
18
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* II. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving
at least one impact that is a *Potentially Significant Impact' or Potentially Significant Unless
Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Use and P!aiining TransportaIioi*circul*ii0n Public Services
Population and Housiug Biologi*l Resources Utilities
X Ea* Resources Energy and Mineral Resources Aesthetics
Water Risk of Upse* aud HU!nan Healih Culltiraj Resoucces
Air Quality Noise Rec*tion
Mandatory Fiudings of Sigi*ificance
ifi. DETERMINATION.
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant cifect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have significant effect on the
* environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the
environment, but at least, 1) one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards; and 2) has been addressed by
mitigation measures baeed on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets,
ifthe effect is a potentially significant impact" or potential significant unless
mitigated". AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it
must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
Date___ 12118/96
Printed Na e and Title__Leslie Mouriquand; Associate Planner___________________________
For: City of La Ottinta. Community Development Department
P:*ESLIE\EC96-334 II-
10
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* Poten*iaIiy
Pot* Significan* * Than
*igiiiri*an* UnI* Signifi*ant No
Imp.i*t \iiligated Impa* Inipact
3.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the
project:
a)Conflict with general plan designation or zoning?
Source #(s): x
b)Conflict with applicable environniental plans or
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over
the project? x
c)Affect agricultural resources or operations e.g.
impact to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)? x
d)Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement ofan
established community including a low-income or
minority community)? x
3.2 POPULATION AND HOUSING.
WO?Ild the project:
a)Cumulatively exceed official regional or local
population projections? x
b)Induce substantial growth in an area either directly
or indirectly e.g. through projects in an undeveloped
area or extension or major infrastructure)? x
c)Displace existing housing, especially affordable x
housing?
3.3 EARTH AND GEOLOGY. Woi*Id the pr*ect
resiitt ip: or expose people to pote,,tial impacts
i**volvhig:
a)Fault rupture? x
b)Seismic ground shaking x
c)Seismic ground failure, including liquefaction? x
d)Seiche, tsunami, or volcanic hazard? x
e)Landslides or mudflows? x
f)Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil
conditions from excavation, grading or fill? x
g)Subsidence ofthe land? x
h)Expansive soils? x
i)Unique geologic or physical features? x
P:\LESLIE*EC*334 Iii-
11
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* Potenlially
PO(eritI*II* Si*ificani L* Than
Significant Unless Significant No
Impact Mitigattd Impact
3.4 Water. Wo,dd the project resijil ii,:
a)Chan8es in absorption rates, drainage patterns, or
the rate and amount of surface runoff? x
b)Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? x
c)Discharge into surface watCrS or other alteration of
surface water quality e.g. temperature, dissolved
Oxygen or turbidity? x
d)changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? x
e)changes in currents or the course or direction of
water movements? x
f)change in the quantity ofground waters, either
through direct additions or withdrawals, or through
interception ofan aquifer by cuts or excavations or
through substantial loss of groundwater recharge
capability? x
g)AItered direction or rate of flow of groundwater? x
h)Impacts to groundwater quality? x
3.5 AIR QUALITY. Would the pro/ect.'
a)Violate any air quality standard to contribute to an
existing or projected air quality violations? x
b)Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? x
c)AIter air movement, m6isture, or temperature, or
cause any change in climate? x
d)Create objectionable odors? x
3.6 *NSPORTATION/CIRCULAT1ON.. Would
the project resilit iii:
a)Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? x
b)Hazards to safety from design features e.g. sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses e.g. farm equipment)? x
\LESLIE*C%*334 IV,'
12
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* f,oten**ajIv
*oI*nIiilIy *ign*I'I**ui( * Than
S*gnti*iI *`nI* S*yiificant No
\litigaicd Irnpa*
c)Tnadequate emergency access or access to nearby
uses? x
d)Insufficient parking capacity on Site or offsite? x
e)Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? x
f)conflicts with adopted policies supporting
alternative transportation e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle
racks)? x
g)Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? x
3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. W()uld the pro#ct
resiut in impacts 10.'
a)Endangered, threatened or rare species or their
habitats including but not limited to plants, fish,
insects, animals, and birds? x
b)Locally designated species e.g. heritage trees)? x
c)Locally designated natural communities e.g. oak
forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? x
d)Wetland habitat e.g. marsh, riparian and vernal
pool)? x
e)Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? x
3.8 ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the project:
a)Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? x
b)Use non-renewable resources in a wasteftil and
inefficient manner? x
3.9 RISK OF UPSETIHUMAN HEALTH. Woi,Id the
proposal involve:
a)A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances including, but not limited to:
oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? x
b)Possible interference with an emergency response
plan or emergency evacuation plan? x
c)The creation ofany health hazard or potential
health hazards? x
P *ESLIE*EC%-334 V-
13
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* Poi*nii*IIy
Poiu'iji*jv Sig*jficani *
Si*r'ifc*nt Uni* S*g*i*cant *o
Impaci Mi*igaIed mpacl mpact
d)Exposure of people to existing sources of potential x
health hazards?
e)Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable x
brush, grass, or trees?
3.10 NOISE. Wo,ild the proposal rt'**h in:
a)*creases in existing noise levels? x
b)Exposure of people to severe noise levels? x
3.11 PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal hrn'e an
effect l#pon, or resiilt in a need for new or altered
government services in any of the following areas:
a)Fire protection? x
b)Police protection? x
c)Schools? x
d)Maintenance of public facilities, including roads? x
e)other governmentaj services? x
3.12 UTILIIII'IES. WO,(ld the proposal reA7Ilt in a need
for new Systems, or siibstantial alterations 10 the
following *itilities:
a)Power or natural gas? x
b)Communications systems? x
c)Locaj or regional water treatment or distribution x
facilities?
d)Sewer or septic tanks? x
e)Storm water drainage x
f)Solid waste disposal? x
3.13 AESThETICS. Would the proposak
a)Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? x
b)Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? x
c)Create light or glare? I x
3.14 CULTURAL RESOURCES. Wo,dd the proposak
P:\LESLIE*EC96.334 vi-
14
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M
* Pot*niiaiIy
PoI*n*i*IIy Signi*canI I-. Th*n
SigniIi**nt Unless Significani No
Impaci Mitigi* mpacl Impaci
a)Disturb paleontological resources? x
b)Disturb archaeological resources? x
c)Affect historical resources? x
d)Have the potential to cause a physical change
which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? x
e)Restrict existing religious of sacred uses within the
potential impact area? x
3.15 RECREATION. Wo*ild the proposak
a)Increase the demand for neighborhood or regional
parks or other recreational facilities? x
b)Affect existing recreational opportunities? x
3.16 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE.
a)Does the project have the Potential to degrade the
quality of the environmental* substantially reduce the
habitat ofa fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? x
b)Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? x
c)Does the project have impacts that are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project are considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable ftirther projects). x
d)Does the project have environmental effects which
will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly? x
p:\LESLIE*C96-334 vii-
15
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* S*ON 1: INTRODUCTION
1.1 PROJECT OVERV[EW
The purpose of this Initial Study is to identi* any potential environmental impacts of the
pro posed Certificate of Appropriateness 96-002 to seismically retrofit and rehabilitate an
histbric coynmercial building and shed located in the La Quinta village area. The building is
located at 77-895 Aveni*da Montezuma.
The historic building is a two-story structure built in the 1930's as part of the initial
development of the cove area of La Quinta. The property initially served as a lumber yard,
with lumber stored in the shed. Later the main building served as a post office, and real
estate office after that. Currently the main building and shed are vacant.
The Applicant has submitted to the City rehabilitation and seismic retrofit plans for the
shed and the main building. The unenclosed shed is a rectangular shaped, single story
building located along the south property line. The roof is supported by interior wood
posts and beam trusses. The east, west, and south elevation walis consist of concrete
interlocking block. The Applicant is proposing minimal external design modifications. The
work that is proposed will consist of removing the wood roof framing and replacing it
with framing conforming to the State Historic Building Code. The existing clay roof tile
will be salvaged and replaced over the new roof sheeting. The main building is a square
shaped, two story structure representative of the Monterey architectural style with clay tile
roof, stucco walls, and second story balcony. The windows are niulti-pane lights with steel
mullions and frame. Quoms highlight the facade. An external staircase on the west
elevation leads to the second story apartment. Seismically retrofitting the building, using
the State Historic Building Code will include the transfer of lateral forces from the roof
diaphragm through the walls to the foundation, injecting all cracks with epoxy, and
intilling with concrete block a rear window in order to provide more st*cturai stability.
The Applicant proposes to create a one-way drive aisle from Avenida Montezuma through
the property onto the existing alley. Twelve parking spaces are proposed, including two
handicapped spaces. An existing chain link fence encloses the compound. Several
landscape planters are proposed in the parking area.
The City of La Quinta is the Lead Agency for the project review, as defined by Section
21067 of the California Environmental Quality Act CEQ A). The Lead Agency is the
public agency which has the principal responsibility for carrying out or approving a project
which may have a significant effect upon the environment. The City of La Quinta, as the
Lead Agency, has the authority to oversee the environmental review and to approve the
proposed Certificate of Appropriateness.
19
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M*1.2 BACKGROUND OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The proposed Certificate of Appropriateness was deemed subject to the environmental
review requirements of CEQA because the building is listed as a local historic resource.
Historic resources in La Quinta are subject to the requirements of Title 7 of the City's
Municipal Code Historic Preservation Ordinance), which requires environmental review
and City Council approval.
1.3 SUMMARY OF PRELIMINARY ENV[RONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
This Initial Study indicates that there is a potential for adverse environmental impacts for
one issue area contained in the Environmental Checklist, that is Earth Resources, unless
mitigation is implemented. Mitigation measures, in the form of seismic retrofitting, have
been identified and recommended for the proposed rehabilitation of the historic building
and shed. As a result, a Mitigated Negative Declaration of Environmental Impact will be
recommended for this project. An EIR will not be necessary.
SECTION 2: PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 PROJECT LOC*ON AND PHYSICAL CRARACTE*CS
The historic two-story building and accessory shed proposed for rehabilitation are located
at 77-895 Avenida Montezuma, in the City of La Quinta. The structures were constructed
in the 1930's to service a planned residential unit development. It is located within a
commercially-zoned district. There is a vacant lot adjacent to the west of the property.
Most other surrounding parcels are developed.
The Applicant proposes to rehabilitate the main building and shed and seismically
retrofitting it to meet current earthquake codes. The main building will be used as an
office on the lower floor and a residence on the second floor. The shed will be used as
storage and covered parking.
2.1 DISC*ONARY ACTIONS
A discretionary action is an action taken by a government agency that calls for the exercise
of judgment in deciding whether to approve a project. For this project, the government
agency is the City of La Quinta. The proposed retrofitting and rehabilitation will require
discretionary approval by the City Council. The following discretionary approvals will be
required for this project:
Certification of the Environmental Assessment for the project;
Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness 96-002.
There are no other projects related to this project.
20
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* SE*ON 3: ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
This section analyzes the potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed
rehabilitation of an historic property. The CEQA Checklist issue areas are evaluated in this
addendum. For each checklist item, the environmental setting is discussed, including a
description of the existing conditions within the City and the areas affected by the
proposed project. Threshoids of significance are defined either by standards adopted by
responsible or trustee agencies, or by referring to criteria in CEQA Appendix G).
3.1 LAND USE AND PLANNING
Regional Environmental Setting
The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, in the eastern portion of
Riverside County. Portions of the valley are urbanized and developed. Nine cities are
located within the valley. A large portion of the valley is in the unincorporated jurisdiction
of Riverside County. The topographical relief ranges from 237 feet below sea level msl)
to about 2,000 feet above rnsl. The valley is physiographically a part of the Colorado
Desert region. Surrounding the valley are the San Jacinto Mountains, the Santa Rosa
Mountains, the Orocopia Mountains, and the San Bernardino Mountains. The San
Andreas earthquake fault transects the northeastern edge of the valley.
Local Environmental Setting
The proposed project site is located at 77-895 Avenida Montezuma, La Quinta, California.
The property faces the south side of Frances Hack Park, in the village area of La Quinta.
The project site is a compound of buildings consisting of a two story main building, and a
single story open shed. The property is within an urbanized area with commercial
properties to the west, north, and east, and residential properties to the south.
Analysis
There are no identifiable impacts to land use or planning issues. The project site is zoned
Village Park VP) on the City's Zoning Map, and designated as Village Commercial VC)
on the City's General Plan Map. The zoning district is consistent with the General Plan
designation. Uses perrnitted within the VC Zoning District include residential as a
secondary use, offices, services and lirnited sales within offices, personal services, food
service, classes, art display, small goods sales or rental, parking lots, and other uses with
an approved Conditional Use Permit.
The rehabilitation of the project site will not conflict with any environmental plans or
poucies adopted by the City. Rather, the proposed project will be in keeping with the
goals and requirements of the Historic Preservation Ordinance for the maintenance and
preservation of the City's historic resources.
21
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M*There are no existing agricultural resources or operations nearby the project site, thus
there will be no conflict or adverse impact to farmlands or agricultural soils.
The proposed project will not require reconfiguration of the existing property boundaries
or buildings that might create a physical division of the established neighborhood or
circulation system.
There are no impacts to this issue area. No mitigation is required.
3.2 POPU*ON AND ROUSING
Regional Environmental Setting
Between 1980 and 1990, the population of La Quinta expanded 125%, as reported by the
U.S. Census, making the City the second *stest growing city in the Coachella Valley.
Local Environmental Setting
La Quinta has approximately 8,000 seasonal residents who spend three to six months each
year in the City. It is estimated that 30% of all housing units in the City are used by
seasonal residents. The housing stock as of 1996 consists of 9,352 total units.
Etimicity data from the 1990 Census revealed that the composition of La Quinta's
population is 70% Caucasian, 26% Hispanic, 1.6% Afro-American, 1.5% Asian, and * 0%
Native American.
Analysis
The proposed rehabilitation of the project site will not result in the creation of additional
new housing units or displace any housing units. The existing second floor apartment in
the main building. will be remodeled for ftiture use as a residence. The project is not
projected to result in substantial growth to the local area. No mitigation is required.
3.3 EARTH RESOURCES
Regional Environmenial Setting
Th* City of La Quinta has gently sloping topography in the cove area due to the alluvial
fan. Adjacent hillsides are steep and rocky. The north portions of the City are relatively
flat with some areas of rolling sand dunes. The alluvial soils that make up most of the City
are underlain by igneous-metamorphic rock, as seen in outcrops in the Santa Rosa
Mountains and the Coral Reef Mountains. The Coachella Valley is underlain by hundreds
of feet to several thousand feet of Quartnernary fluvial, lacustrine, and aeolian soil
deposits Southland Geotechnical 1996:6).
22.
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M*Local Environmenial Setting
The project site is within a local commercial district first developed in the mid-I 930's. The
property is flilly developed with bulldin8s and hardscape.
There are two inferred earthquake fault lines located in the southern portion of the cove
area. There has been no recorded activity along this fault line, thus there 5 a low
probability for such activity to occur. The City of La Quinta lies in a seismically active
region of Southern California. Faults in the area include the San Andreas and Mission
Creek faults located several miles to the north and west of the City. The project lies within
Groundshalling Zone III Sources: Riverside County Comprehensive General Plan; La
Quinta General Plan; La Quinta MEA).
Analysis
No new grading is pr6posed for the project. Thus, there are no impacts to earth and soil
Lssues.
The main building and shed were constructed in the 1930's and do not meet the current
seismic safety building code requirements. The Applicant is proposing to retrofit the
buildings in accordance with the State *4istoric Building Code. Retrofluing will serve as
mitigation for this project's seismic issues.
3.4 WATER
Regional Environmenial Setting
Groundwater resources in the La Quinta area consist of a system of large aquifers porous
layers of rock material containing water) and groundwater basins separated by bedrock or
layers of soil that trap or retain groundwater. La Quinta is located above the Coachella
Valley Groundwater Basin which is the major water supply for the potable water needs of
the City as well as a significant supply for the City's nonpotable irrigation needs. Water is
pumped from the underground aquifer via domestic water wells in the City, operated and
administered by the Coachella Valley Water District CVWD).
Local Envu*nmenial Setting
The project site does not have any natural standing water on it. Lake Cahuilla, a man-
made reservoir is located on the other side of the Coral Reef Mountains, to the east of the
project site. The Whitewater River channel is located approximately 3 miles north of the
project site, but is dry except during seasonal storms.
23
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M*Analysis
The project site has had domestic water service since approximately 1935. No
modifications to the existing water system are proposed for this project. Thus, there will
be no impacts to water issues. No Mitigation is required.
3.5 AIR QUALITY
Regional Environmenial SeUing
The Coachella Valley, including the City of La Quinta, is under the jurisdiction of the
South Coast Air Quality Management District SCAQMD), and in particular, the
Southeast Desert Air Basin SEDAB). A discussion of the jurisdictional organization and
requirements is found in the La Quinta MEA.
Local Environmenial Seuing
The City of La Quinta is located in the Coachella Valley, which has an arid climate,
characterized by hot summers, mild winters, infrequent and low annual rainfall, and low
humidity. Variations in rainfall, temperatures, and localized winds occur throughout the
valley due to the presence of the surrounding mountains. Air quality conditions are closely
tied to the prevailing winds of the region.
Analysis
The proposed rehabilitation project will not result in any identifiable significant air quality
impacts. No mitigation is required.
3.6 Tl*NSPORT*ON/CIRCU*ON
Regional environmenial Seuing
La Quinta is a desert community of over 18,000 permanent residents. Traffic volumes are
subject to considerable seasonal variation due to winter visitors and regional-level events
taking place in La Quinta. The existing circulation system is a combination of early
roadwork by the County and new roadways constructed since La Quinta incorporated in
1982. Key roadways include State Highway 111, Washington Street, Jefferson Street,
Fred Waring Drive, and Eisenhower Drive.
Local Environmenial Seuing
The project site is located on Avenida Montezuma, a local street, within a 1930's
subdivision. The project is located between Eisenhower Drive and Desert Club Drive.
24
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M*Analysis
This project will not add any new vehicle trips, other than those for temporary
Construction activities related to the rehabilitation of the structures. Future use of the
property may generate additional vehicle trips. A parking analysis will be required for all
filture uses.
The proposed on-site circulation system will consist of a one-way access through the
property from Avenida Montezuma to the alley behind the property. Driveway widths and
parking spaces will be required to meet the development standards in the Zoning
Ordinance.
The project site does not have any identifiable haaards or barriers for pedestrians or
bicyclists. In addition, the proposed circulation system will not conflict with any adopted
policies concerning alternative transport, ation. There will be no impacts to rail,
waterborne, or air traffic, as these transportation facilities are not located near the project
site. No mitigation is required for this issue area.
3.7 BIOLOGICAL RESOIURCES
Regional Environmenlal Sening
The City of La Quinta lies within the Colorado Desert regional environment. Two
ecosystems are found within the City, the Sonoran Desert Scrub and the Desert
Transition. The disturbed environments within the City are classified as either urban or
agricultural. A detailed discussion of these ecosystems is found in the La Quinta Master
Environmental Assessment 1992).
Local Environmenlal Assessmeni
The project site is developed with a main building, shed, enclosed storage building, and
hardscape. The surrounding parcels are also developed.
Analysis
The project site has been deve*oped since the mid-1930's. There is no remaining natural
biological systems on or adjacent to the project site. No biological impacts are identifiable.
No mitigation is required.
3.8 ENEGY AND MINE*IAL RESOURCES
Regional Environmental Selting
The City of La Quinta contains both areas of insignificant and significant Mineral
Aggregate Resource Areas SMAAA), as designated by the State Department of
25
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* Conservation. There are no known oil resources in the City. Major energy resources used
in La Quinta come from the Imperial Irrigation District lID), The Gas Company, and
various gasoline distribution companies Source: La Quinta MEA).
Local Environmenial Sefting
There are no oil wells or other fliel or energy producing facilities or resources on or near
the project site. Since the project site has been developed for many years, there are no
remaining natural energy resources existing.
Analysis
The City of La Quinta does not have any adopted energy conservation plans, for which
this project might conflict. The proposed rehabilitation is not anticipated to use non-
renewable resources in a wasteft*l or inefficient manner. No mitigation is required Source:
Seismic retrofit plans).
3.9 RISK OF UPSET/HUMAN HEALTH
Regional Environtiwnial Assessmenl
Recent growth pressure has dramatically increased the City's exposure to hazardous
materials. Such exposure to toxic materials can occur through the air, in drinking water, in
food, in drugs and cosmetics, and in the work place. Although large scale, hazardous
waste generating employrnent is not yet present in La Quinta, the existence of chemicals
utilized in dry cleaning operations, agricultural activities, restaurant Icitchen cleaning,
landscape irrigation and exposure to large scale electrical facilities may pose significant
threats to various sectors of the population.
Local Environmen*al Sening
In order to comply with AB 2948-Hazardous Waste Management Plans and Facility Siting
Procedures, the City of La Quinta adopted Ordinance 184 consisting of a haaardous
Waste Management Plan. The project site has not been used for any type of hazardous
waste dumping, as can be determined by the City.
Analysis
The prQposed rehabilitation will involve seismic retrofitting and remodeling of an existing
building and shed. Commonly used construction materials will be used.
There is no identifiable risk of hazardous substances or explosion associated with the
proposed rehabilitation work to be done on the main building or shed. No mitigation
measures are required.
26
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* 3.10 NOISE
Regional Environmenlal Setting
Noise levels in the City of La Quinta are created by a variety of sources primarily in and
near the City boundaries. The major sources of noise include vehicles on City streets and
Highway 111. Temporary construction noise is another noise factor found in the City. The
ambient noise levels are dominated by vehicular noise along the highway and major arterial
roadways.
Local Environmen*al Setting
The ambient nbise level at the project site is dominated by vehicle traffic noise from
Avenida Montezuma and Eisenhower Drive. Residential areas are considered noise-
sensitive land uses, especially during the nighttime hours. The nearest residential uses are
located directly behind the Kiener Building. The State Building Code requires that interior
noise levels in buildings do not exceed CNEL 45. The General Plan for the City requires
that exterior noise levels do not exceed CNEL 60 Source: Site Survey; La Quinta
General Plan; La Quinta MEA).
Analysis
The only identifiable increase in existing noise levels will be temporary construction noise
associated with the rehabilitation of the main building and the shed. These noises are not
anticipated to be severe, of long duration, or significant. No mitigation other than
compliance with City regulated construction hours and days is required.
3.11 PUBLIC SERVICES
Regional Environmental Setting
Law enforcement services are provided to the City through a contract with the Riverside
County Sheriff's Department. The Sheriff's Department extends service to the City from
existing facilities located in the City of Indio. There is a small Sheriff's substation located
within the La Quinta City Hall. The Department utilizes a planning standard of 1.5
deputies per 1,000 population to forecast additional public safety personnel requirements
in La Quinta at buildout. Based on this standard, the City should have a police force of
25.5 officers, but is currently underserved.
Fire protection service is provided by the Riverside County Fire Department through a
contractual arrangement. The Fire Department administers two stations in the City. The
Fire Department also provides building and business Inspections, plan review, and
27
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M*construction inspections. Based upon a planning standard of one paid firefighter per 1,000
population, the City is currently underserved.
Structural fires and fires from other man-made features are the most significant fire threats
to the City. HiUside and brush fires are minimal as the hillside areas are barren and
scattered brush on the valley floor is too sparse to pose a serious fire threat.
Both the Desert Sands Unified School District and the Coachella Valley Unified School
District serve the City. There is one elementary school, one middle school, and one high
school withih the City. A second elementary school is under construction. The City is also
within the College of the Desert community College District.
Library services are provided by the Riverside County Library System with a branch
library located in the Village area of the City. The existing facility opened in 198* and
unadopted planning standards of 0.5 squ&* feet per capita and 1.2 volumes per*capita are
used to forecast fliture facility requirements. Utilizing this 1992 standard, the City was
underserved in space but overserved in terms of volumes.
Health care services are provided in the City through JFK Memorial Hospital in Indio, and
the Eisenhower Immediate Care Facility in the 111 La Quinta Center. Thc Riverside
County Health Department administers a variety of health programs for area residents and
is located in Indio. Paramedic service is provided to the City by Springs Ambulance
Service.
Local Environnwnial Setting
The nearest fire station is Station #32 on Frances Hack Lane, approximately 1 mile
southeast of the project site.
Governmental services for the City of La Quinta are provided by City staff at the Civic
Center, and by other CQunty, state, and federal agency offices located in the desert area or
region. The project site will be se*rviced by the local schools.
Analysis
There is no identifiable impact to fire protection, police protection, schools, malntenance
of public facilities, roads, or other governmental services. The project site has existing
buildings which will be rehabilitated. No new buildings will be constructed. The existing
buildings have been on the project site since the 193b's, thus, there is no additional or new
impact to public services over that which has been there for over 60 years.
28
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* 3.12 UTILITIES
Regional Environmental Semng
The City of La Quinta 5 served by the Imperial Irrigation District III)) for electrical
power supply, and by The Gas Company TGC) for natural gas service. Existing power
and gas lines and substations are found throughout the City. lID has four substations in La
Quinta, with electricity generated by a steam plant in El Centro and hydroelectric power
generated by the All American Canal. General Telephone Exchange GTE) provides
telephone services for the City.
The Coachella Valley Water District CVWD) provides water and sewer service to the
City. CVWD obtains its water from underground aquifers and from the Colorado River.
CVWD operates a water system with potable water pumped from domestic wells in the
City. The wells range in depth from 509 to 900 feet. Potable water is stored in five
reservoirs located in La Quinta.
The stormwater drainage system is administered by the CVWD, which maintains and
operates a comprehensive system to collect and transport flows through the City.
The City is served by Waste Management of the Desert for solid waste collection and
disposal. Nonhazardous, mixed municipal solid waste is taken to three landfills within the
Coachella Valley.
Local Environmental Setting
The project site is almost entirely surrounded by development. The local area has been
serviced by electricity and water since the 1930's. Sewer was brou8ht in to the Cove in
the recent past.
Analysis
There is no anticipated additional electrical service, natural gas, communications systems,
local or regional water treatment or distribution facilities, sewer or septic tanks, storm
water dralnage, 6r solid waste disposal beyond that which already exists. The project site
has been developed for over sixty years. No mitigation is required for this issue area.
3.13 AESTHETICS
Regional Environmental Setting
The City of La Quinta is partially located within a desert valley cove. There are hillside to
the west and south of the City. Views of the desert and surrounding mountains are visible
throughout most of the City.
29
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M*Local Environmenlal Setting
The project site is located in a village commercial district surrounded by residential land
uses. The commercial district was created in the 1930's as part of the original subdivision
and development of the Cove. Both single and two story buildings exist in the village
commercial district. Views from the project site consists of the Santa Rosa and Coral Reef
Mountains to the south and southwest, the Santa Rosa Mountains to the west and south,
and the open valley floor to the northeast Source: Site Survey; La Quinta MEA)
Analysis
The proposed rehabilitation of the main building and shed will not alter the existing scenic
vistas in the cove area. No additional height will be added to the main building or the shed
that might result in additional impacts. No mitigation is required for this issue area.
3.14 CULTURAL RESOURCES
Regional Envir*nmental Setting
The prehistory and history of the City of La Quinta is interconnected with that of the
entire Coachella valley. A Draft Historic Context Statement has been prepared for the City
that discusses both the prehistory and the historic periods of the valley and La Quinta.
Local Environmental Setting
The project site is located in the cove area of the City. There are several historical
structures in and around the cove. A city-wide historic resource survey is currently being
conducted by Mellon and Associates in which the project site will be included.
Analysis
The project site is listed in the La Quinta General Plan as an historical building. The
property was first developed by Harry Kiener, a developer from Big Bear, California. Mr.
Kiener sought to create a reciprocal seasonal club development the desert Club) to
compliment the one he had built in Big Bear the Peter Pan Club). A village commercial
center was developed to ser'vice the residential development. The Kiener Building first
served as a lumberyard for the construction of the residential bungalows and other
commercial buildings in the cove. In later years, the main building is said to have served as
a post office, real estate office, and other office uses. The complex of structure on this
property will be documented by Mellon & Associates during the City-wide historic
resources survey.
The seismic retrofit plans and rehabilitation plans have been reviewed by the Historic
Preservation Commission for compatibility with the guidelines of the Secretarv of the
Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties with Guidelines for
30
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M*Preservin* Rehabilitatin* Restorin* & Reconstructing* Historic Buildin*s. The
Commission forwarded a recommendation of approval for this project. No other
mitigation is required.
3.15 RECREATION
Regional Environ*ntal Setting
The City of La Quinta has an adopted Parks and Recreation Master Plan that assesses the
existing resources and the ft*ture needs of the City. The City has approximately 28.7 acres
of developed parkland under the Quimby Act requirements. The 845 acre regional Lake
Cahuilla Park is not included in this count. There are also bike and equestrian pathways
within the City and designated pedestrian hiking trails.
Local Envi'ronmeniai Setting
The project site is developed with existing buildings. Across the street, to the north.is a
community park. This park features basketball courts, baseball fields, a community
building, playground equipment, a gazebo and picnic tables. The park has been in
existence for many years, and is administered by the Coachella Valley Parks and
Recreation District. Recently, the park was renamed Frances Hack Park.
Analysis
The proposed project will not impact the existing park across the street, or create
additional demand for such facilities. There is no required mitigation for this issue area.
SECTION 4: MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
The Initial Study for the proposed project will not have immitigable significant adverse
impacts on the environmental issues addressed in the checklist and addendum. The
following findings can be made regarding the mandatory findings of significance set forth
in Section 15065 of the CEQA Guidelines and based on the results of this environmental
assessment:
The proposed rehabilitation and seismic retrofit of the Kiener Main Building and
shed will not have the p6tential to degrade the quality of the environment, with the
Implementation of mitigation measures, as the retrofit and rehabilitation will
enhance the quality of the environment by compliance with safety codes.
The proposed project will not have the potential to achieve short term goals to the
disadvantage of long-term goals. with the successfiil implementation of mitigation,
as the preservation of the buildings is in keeping with the General Plan goals and
policies for historic resources.
31
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M*The proposed project will not have impacts which are individually limited but
cumulatively considerable when considering the existing development in the
immediate vicinity.
The proposed project will not have environmental effects that will adversely affect
human, either directly or indirectly, with the implementation of mitigation, as the
retrofit will increase the structural stability of the main building and shed.
SE*ON 5: EARLIER ANALYSES
A. Eadier Analyses Used. The La Quinta Master Environmental Assessment
prepared in 1991, in conjunction with the 1992 General Plan Update and
related EIR.
B. Impacts Adequately Addressed. Impacts were previously addressed only in
very general terms.
C. Mitigation Measures. Mitigation measures are discussed in this addendum
as they relate to the proposed project. A Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be
included as part of the Environmental Assessment and project conditions of
approval.
32
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* 0*
0*.
N
o
* 0* *
* *
*
0
* *0Z*O* *
o'*0* *
* * *
* 0** *
o
*z
o
z
0
* 0
C',
0 *
0z *
*
0
0
33
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M*0
0
*
*zoi
0 * *
34
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M* z
I----
1-
L-
t
2.2 *
0
* *`
uE! *
0
1
I-
*
*
I-
* * *
35
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M*
0
C
*0*z
C',
* *
C *
0 *zO'
38
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M *0
U
U
0
*LI
0
* L.
0*
0
37
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M!*0
*0
2o
0
0*
0
0 *
I
6
*
*
0
38
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M"* z
2
0
0
* 0
C',
* 0*
*
0
0
39
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M#*0
0
*oz-
C',
0
C',
* 0
E z*
2
* 0
0
40
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M$*
*0
0
*
*
6
*
* *0 *
41
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M%*0
U
0
U
U
i-0
6
U
*
o
U
U
U
U U U
C
I*;* *
o E
E OZI
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M&* 0
*
0 *
0 E *
t
1 *
I-
* Ce
C',
*
*
* * 22 *
* *
*
43
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M'*0
0
0
*
*
C
0
AL
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M(*0
h-u
0
C',
C',
h-u
h-u 5*.
C',
0
45
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M)*0
C,,
E
t *
2
C,,
E
* *0
C,,
*-**
oz
*o *
0
C
*L.- t
**
C,,* C
*C 2
CL-
* 0,
z *.*L.- *
* **
* * * E
Aa
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02
^!M** 0
In-
0
* 0
0
47
BIB]
09-01-1998-U01
03:42:33PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CCRES-U02
97-U02
12-U02