Loading...
1995 02 21 CC Minutes LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES February 21, 1995 Regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council on February 21, 1995 was called to order at the hour of 3:00 p.m. by Mayor Pena, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Council Members Bangerter, Cathcart, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena ABSENT: None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, asked that a closed session item be added to the agenda under Government Code Section 54956.9 regarding on-going litigation report conference with attorney concerning Hudson vs. the City of La Quinta. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter that the closed session item, Hudson vs. the City of La Quinta, be added to the closed session agenda as it came up after the agenda was prepared. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to approve the City Council Minutes of February 7, 1995 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. ANNOUNCEMENTS None PRESENTATIONS None PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Martin Langer, 49-994 El Circulo, President of Community Concerts of La Quinta, commented on three concerts to be given in La Quinta by Pacific Symphony on March 11th and 12th. He advised that Community Concerts of La Quinta wish to demonstrate La Quinta's hospitality and appreciation by serving dinner to the youth group using the Senior Center facility and asked the Council to waive the facility-use fee. Council Member Perkins commented that he realized that the Council just recently adopted the facility-use policy, but was in favor of waiving the fee for this event because the youth group is coming to La Quinta to perform at their own expense and he felt it was a worthy cause. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 2 February 21, 1995 Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that if the Council wished to address the issue they could add the item to the agenda since the need arose after the agenda was prepared. However, approval of a fee-waiver would also require an amendment to the Senior Center Facility-Use Policy which states that fees may only be waived for fund?raising events for the Senior Center. Council Member Bangerter suggested that staff assist Community Concerts in locating an alternate facility. Mayor Pena advised that the Council is bound by the policy and doesn't have the discretion to waive the fees and suggested that the item be discussed at the March 7th Council meeting. Council Member Cathcart was concerned that there would be insufficient time for the group to make their arrangements if a decision wasn't made until March 7th. Council Member Sniff commented that there are many worthy causes, but didn't feel that the City should change the policy so soon after adopting it and agreed that the staff should assist Community Concerts in locating an alternate site. Council Member Perkins requested that the policy be reviewed at the next Council meeting. Council Member Bangerter said that she would investigate the possible use of some alternate sites. Mr. Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, commented that he was pleased that the auto mall proposal is a dead issue," but was still dissatisfied about the meetings being held in closed session because whatever happened remains a Secret to the citizens of La Quinta. Mayor Pefla commented that the Council is also somewhat confused, but advised that the closed session meetings were with the City of Indio and in which business points were being discussed and that the Council never did meet with Midland during closed session. Council Member Sniff advised that he planned to bring the issue up for discussion during Mayor and Council Members' Items later in the agenda. WRHTEN CORRESPONDENCE 1. LETThR FROM LIBERTY MUTUAL LEGENDS OF GOLF REGARDING PLACEMENT OF AN AD IN THE TOURNAMENT PROGRAM. In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Genovese, City Manager advised that the BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 3 February 21, 1995 City has advertised in the Bob Hope Classic Tournament Program. Council Member Perkins suggested that with the flinding that the City gives the Chamber of Commerce that they should be doing this on the City's behalf. Council referred the letter to the Chamber of Commerce. BUSINESS SESSION CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST TO RELEASE $15,000 TO THE COLLEGE OF THE DESERT REGIONAL BUSINESS ASSISTANCE CENTER. Mayor Pena advised that the applicant has requested a continuance Council Member Sniff wasn't sure that it was productive to prolong the issue because the applicant seems to be having trouble producing the requested material. Council Member Cathcart advised that he visited the Center and felt that they were somewhat confused by the Council's first request for information. He supported a continuance. Council Member Bangerter concurred. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to continue the funding- request by the Regional Business Assistance Center to March 7, 1995. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-35. 2. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE SUBDIVISION FLAG POLICY. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that on October 18, 1994, the Council adopted a subdivision flag policy which limited the number of temporary advertising flags allowed in each subdivision to a maximum of eight flags. He advised that Vintage Homes and Marquessa Homes have each requested permission to erect eight flags, but their requests were denied by staff because their individual projects are located within the same subdivision, which is only allowed eight flags. On January 17th, staff was directed by Council to review the flag policy after Mr. levine, of Vintage Homes, addressed the Council to request a modification to it. Staff recommended that no modifications be made because some subdivisions have several small builders and a modification would technically allow each builder to erect eight flags, thus circumventing the Council's intent to limit the number of flags. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 4 February 21, 1995 In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Herman advised that some of the flags requested by the two developers identify the builders and some do not. Council Member Sniff commented that he had no problem with the flag policy before it was amended. He suggested that four additional flags be allowed for each additional builder with a limit of 16 per subdivision. He was inclined to continue with the current policy otherwise. In response to Mayor Pefia, Mr. Herman advised that a minimum eligibility of for example, 20 homes could be established for issuing a temporary flag permit, but it would be difficult to monitor and ensure equitable treatment to all builders within a subdivision. Staff believes that builders within a subdivision should have to determine collectively where the flags are to be erected and the flags would need to be generic to the subdivision. In response to Council Member Cathcart, Mr. Herman advised that staff has the latitude to grant one six-month approval with one six-month extension for temporary flag permits. Council Member Cathcart was concerned about the number of flags that might be allowed by modification of the policy and the present lack of uniformity because some flag permits were issued prior to the adoption of the new policy. Council Member Perkins advised that a substantial amount of consideration was given during the drafting of the policy, which was recently adopted, and he was n' tin favor of modifying it at the present time. He also was concerned that a modification would allow too many flags and felt that eight flags per subdivision were sufficient to attract attention. In response to Council Member Cathcart, Ms. Honeywell advised that the specific rules are adopted by a policy that is implemented under the ordinance. A citation can be issued for a violation of the code. Council Member Sniff felt that Mr. Levine's request was reasonable and suggested that Council direct staff to review the policy for possible modifications to accommodate projects where multiple 20-home builders exist. In response to Council Member Cathcart, Mr. Herman advised that the City does not have a special flag policy for The Cove. Council Member Perkins supported the current eight-flag-limit because their usage can become excessive. He advised that in Laguna De La Paz there are two developers with flags which are solely to gain attention to the area and don't advertize either developer specifically. The subdivision across from Laguna De La Paz has had up to 40 flags BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 5 February 21, 1995 along Washington Street and another 30 in the interior area that were visible from Washington Street. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to continue the current policy and direct staff to come back to Council with a response to their concerns and comments. Council Member Perkins advised that he wouldn't support the motion because he didn't feel it's necessary to be brought back to Council. Council Member Bangerter suggested that the policy be brought back for review at the end of the six?month period after the last grandfathered permit ends and Council has the opportunity to see all developers within a uniform policy. In response to Mayor Pena, Ms. Honeywell advised that it is the responsibility of the subdivision property owner to allocate the allowable eight flags within a subdivision when more than one developer is involved. Mr. Arthur Levine, 1535 South D" Street, San Bernardino, Project Director of Vintage Homes, advised that the original developer of the Iaake Ia Quinta subdivision developed it as a 281-unit tract, not foreseeing the problems related to developing it as such and would probably have broken it down into smaller tracts otherwise. He advised that the flags within Vintage Homes would not be located on a main street, but rather one block east of Washington Street, and the flags of both developers would be completely uniform. He said that there are three developers within the tract, but are proposing flags for only two and those flags would be erected at opposite ends of the development, approximately 1,000 feet apart. He encouraged the Council to consider their proposal in a timely manner as their model is near completion and assistance is needed with sales momentum. He commented that his intention was not to take issue with the City's ordinance, noting that most of the City's tracts are single-developer tracts, but felt that there are other factors involved with the Lake La Quinta tract. Council Member Sniff continued to support the motion as made. Council Member Cathcart also supported the motion. He was sympathetic to Mr. levine's situation because of the distance between the two entrances to the development, but was concerned about the ramifications a modification might cause in other areas. He suggested that some type of radius guidelines be considered for allowing additional flags within a large development with multiple builders. Motion carried with Council Member Perkins voting NO. MINUTE ORDER NO.95- 36. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 6 February 21, 1995 3. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION TO ALLOW ThMPORARY CLOSURE OF PORTIONS OF AVENIDA MONTEZUMA AND AVENIDA MENDOZA BETWEEN EISENHOWER DRIVE AND AVENWA NAVARRO FOR THE ANNUAL LA QUINTA ARTS FESTIVAL EVENT ON MARCH 16-19, 1995. APPLICANT: LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that the requested street closure is the same as approved in the past. Notifications were sent to all affected public agencies and no objections were received. RESOLUTION NO.95-OS A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA FOR THE ThMPORARY CLOSURE OF PORTIONS OF AVENWA MONTEZUMA AND AVENIDA MENDOZA BETWEEN EISENHOWER DRIVE AND AVENIDA NAVARRO DURING A SPECIAL EVENT TO BE HELD MARCH 1619, 1995. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to adopt Resolution No.95-08 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. 4. CONSIDERATION OF APPOINTMENT OF TWO CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS AND ONE SENIOR REPRESENTATIVE TO SERVE ON THE CIVIC CENT'ER ART PURCIIASE COMMITThE CONSISTING OF COUNCIL MEMBERS AND ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND A SENIOR REPRESENTATIVE) DURING THE LA QUINTA ARTS FESTIVAL. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director? advised that the City has purchased art from the La Quinta Arts Festival since 1989 for placement at the Civic Center and the budget allocation for this year is $3,000. Staff recommended that two Council Members and one Senior Center representative be appointed to the art selection committee to serve with the Arts in Public Places Committee and that a 10% leeway be allowed in the purchase to allow for sales tax Council Member Sniff recalled that it was the consensus of Council to rotate the art work between the Civic Center and the Senior Center and noted that some art purchases are selected for specific locations. He questioned the rotation process because art selected for a specific location in the Senior Center may not be appropriate for certain locations in the Civic Center. Mr. Herman understood that Council's intent was to select art for the Civic Center and rotate it with the Senior Center if appropriate. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 7 February 21, 1995 Council Member Sniff questioned the appropriateness of having a Senior Center representative on the selection committee, noting that the Arts in Public Places Committee made that recommendation in conjunction with a recommendation to use this year's funds to purchase art for the Senior Center. Mayor Pena didn't have a problem with a Senior Center representative serving on the committee. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to appoint Council Member Perkins, Council Member Cathcart and Rita Woodbury a Senior Center representative) to select Civic Center art during the La Quinta Arts Festival and authorize a 10% leeway over the $3,000 amount. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-37. 5. CONSIDERATION OF REPORT ON PARK AVENUE SAFETY INIPROVEMENTS. Mr. Cosper, Public Works Director, advised that Council directed staff to implement Certain traffic improvements on Park Avenue consisting of striping, signage, and flashing warning beacons near the Painted Cove?Dry Creek intersection. After staff monitored the improvements for 60 days, Council directed them in July, 1994 to reduce the median traffic speed to 41 mph and continue monitoring for an additional six months. He advised that the 85th percentile speed is now at 33 mph and engineering studies support a reduction in the posted speed limit to 30 mph. Traffic has increased in the area, but does not yet warrant a four-way stop intersection. Staff recommended that solar- powered, permanent flashing beacons be installed at a cost of approximately $8,000 and staff given direction to conduct an updated engineering study to ascertain the actual legal speed limit along Park Avenue. In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Cosper advised that the amber flashing beacons could be replaced with red lens if a four-way stop is instituted at a later date. Council Member Perkins suggested that the flashing beacon for southbound traffic be relocated farther away from the comer for improved safety. Council complimented staff for the improved traffic standards implemented along Park Avenue. There were concerns raised regarding the intersection becoming a four-way stop in the future. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 8 February 21, 1995 MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to direct appropriate City staff to 1) include the necessary funding in FY 1995/96 budget to install permanent beacons in lieu of the existing battery-powered beacons, and 2) conduct a new engineering and speed survey to ascertain the potential for lowering the legal speed limit in the reverse curve area of Park Avenue and return to the Council in April, 1995 with the results of that survey for possible adoption of a new speed limit. Motion carried unanimously. MIN'UTE ORDER NO.95-38. 6. CONSIDERATION OF CULTURAL AFFAIRS COMMISSION WORK PLAN. Mr. Hartung, Building & Safety Director, advised that this item was continued from the February 7th meeting because Council bad some concerns with the proposed work plan. He advised that two members of the Cultural Affairs Commission were present to answer questions regarding the work plan. Council Member Perkins commented that he totally supports the Cultural Affairs Commission, but was concerned that some of the projects listed in their work plan would take too much of their time and staff time and perhaps would be best undertaken by an existing organization in the City. He believed the Commission's purpose and objective is to advise the Council on all matters affecting the culture of the City and to advise and assist other City Boards, Committees, and Commissions in the field of the arts and to cooperate and work with all cultural organizations to address arts in La Quinta. Council Member Sniff believed that Council Member Perkins' comments were well taken, but didn't want to stifle the Commission's work. He suggested that they develop relationships with other cultural organizations in the valley. He commented that the number of hours dedicated to this Commission are limited, meeting approximately 25 hours over the course of the year. He felt that their efforts should be focused on the near term, as well as projecting plans for the future and will perhaps go to a metamorphosis as they go along and they should be given that opportunity. Council Member Bangerter felt that the work plan was excellent and wished to hear comments from Susan Francis, a member of the Commission. Ms. Susan Francis, 77-800 Calle Monterey, Chairman of the Cultural Affairs Commission, referred to the arts advocacy section of the work plan which will get the Commission working with other cultural groups and she mentioned some of the items in the work plan which call for the Commission to work with other programs. The largest undertaking will be the pageant, but the Commission will act as overseers and advisors to the other City groups who will be involved. She felt that the Commission's role is to coordinate and encourage the growth of many events. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 9 February 21, 1995 In response to Council Member Perkins, Ms. Francis advised that the Sidewalk Art Contest would be run in conjunction with the Parks & Recreation Departtnent. In regards to the Pageant Steering Committee, she advised that one or two of the Commissioners might sit on the steering committee, but would mostly be involved with making sure the proper committee members were selected to serve. They feel that their responsibility is to be advisory to the other groups working on the programs. Council Member Perkins felt that there is some good, capable and talented people on the Commission. He was only being critical from the standpoint, that he wants the Commission to be doing the kinds of things they should be doing and not getting bogged down doing things that will prevent it from having an umbrella affect. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to approve the Cultural Affairs Commission Work Plan as presented. Motion carried unanimously. MINIJTh ORDER NO.95-39. CONSENT CALENDAR Council Member Bangerter asked that the payment for C.V. Land be removed from Consent Calendar Item No.1 because of a conflict of interest. Mayor Pefla asked that the payment for Williams Development be removed from Consent Calendar Item No.1 also because of a conflict of interest. Council Member Perkins asked that Consent Calendar Item No. 7, Approval of Banking Services, be removed for discussion. 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DAThD FEBRUARY 21, 1995. 2. APPROVAL OF REQUEST BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION TO ATTEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES PLANNERS INSTITTTE IN MONTEREY IN MARCH, 1995. 3. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR AND CURRENT PLANNING PRINCIPAL PLANNER TO ATIEND THE LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES PLANNERS INSTITT'FE IN MONTEREY, MARCH 21-24, 1995. 4. APPROVAL OF OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR THE ANIMAL CONTROL OFFICER TO ATTEND THE CALIFORNIA ANIMAL CONTROL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION ANNUAL CONF'ERENCE IN SAN RAFAEL, CALIFORNIA, APRIL 19-22, 1995. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 10 February 21, 1995 5. APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FOR REGULATION AND CONTROL OF DOMESTIC ANIMALS. 6. AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF A 2'A-TON DUMP TRUCK. 7. APPROVAL OF BANKING SERVICES. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to approve the Consent Calendar as amended. Motion carried unaaimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-40. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Perkins/Catlicart to approve the payment for C.V. Land under Consent Calendar Item No.1. Motion carried with Mayor Pefla and Council Member Bangerter ABSTAINING. MINLJTE ORDER NO.95-41. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Perkins/Bangerter to approve the payment for Williams Development under Consent Calendar Item No.1. Motion carried with Mayor Pens ABSTAINING. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-42. Regarding Item No.7 Council Member Perkins advised that he is still concerned about the commingling of City and Redevelopment funds. He suggested that Page 4 of the Banking Services Agreement be amended to include the City Manager on the notification list. He felt that the City should inspect its funds on a regular basis with a report back to the Council in light of the fmancial woes of Orange County. Council Member Sniff suggested that the Finance Director also be added to the notification list. In response to Mayor Pens, Mr. Genovese, City Manager, advised that the Investment Advisory Board is updated monthly on the City's investments and Minutes of their meetmgs are included with the Council agenda packet. MOTION It was moved by Council Members PerkinsICathcart to approve the Banking Services Agreement as amended. Council Member Sniff advised that he served on the selection committee for the banking services and felt that it is a positive move for the City. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-43. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 11 February 21, 1995 STUDY SESSION Mayor Pen a abstained from this issue due to a conflict of interest and left the dais at this time. 1. CONSWERATION OF PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION'S RECOMMENDATION FOR REDESIGN OF FIIIITZ BURNS PARK PROJECT. Mr. Cosper, Public Works Director, advised that on February 6th, 8th, and 9th, public meetings were held to gain input from the public regarding the redesign/downsizing of Phase I of the Fritz Burns Park pool. He advised that on February 13th the Parks & Recreation Commission reviewed the comments received and made the following recommendations: 1) Eliminate the tot pool 2) Eliminate the pool bleachers 3) Reduce the size of the main pool by eliminating the ears 4) Leave the aquatics building as-is 5) Proceed with construction of the park portion of the project, eliminate construction of the pool and supporting facilities at the present time, and set aside space for the pool and supporting facilities for inclusion after completion of the park construction He reviewed an analysis of the public comments received from the three meetings, noting that affordability was the main reason given for redesigning the pool. Other comments were: redesign the pool and park; build the park only at this time, and; retain the current design of the pool. Suggestions for redesign of the park included: cut-back on the aquatics building, cut-back on landscaping and eliminate the bleachers and, eliminate the tot pool. He requested further direction from the Council. Ms. Leslie Wenzel, 51-520 Avenida Mendoza, commented that she mailed her comments to staff and asked if her comments were included in the survey, to which Mr. Cosper answered yes. Her concern was that the cost of the pool was greater than the usage would support, noting that her neighbor's children used their pool very little last summer. She suggested providing a shuttle and monitoring the use of the high school pool before spending the money to build one. She felt that roads and sewers should be finished before beginning construction on a pool. Mr. Robert Metkus, advised that he attended all the meetings regarding the Fritz Burns Park from the onset and at no time were costs mentioned. He said that public comments at that time were not supportive of a pool; the people wanted a park only. The recent survey reported 54% don't want a pool. He questioned whether or not the City can * afford a $3 million pool when the high school and the people in North La Quinta need Adams Street and Dune Palms Road repaired. He asked for a status report on these road BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 12 February 21, 1995 repairs. Mr. Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, commented that he also attended the three public meetings. As an engineer who deals with facts, he had never witnessed such a debacle filled with emotions rather than facts. He was dissatisfied with staff's subjective analysis of the public comments, noting that many attendees didn't speak for or against the project. He commented on discrepancies reported on the number of children living in the Cove with the amounts varying from 1,200 to 3,000. He referred to emotional" responses such as a necessity for it to be a 25 meter x 25-yard pool or that a pool would be too far away if located at the Boys & Girls Club. He questioned what too far" is. He asked if use of the high school pool had been seriously discussed and was the proposed financing legal. He felt that the project should be tabled until a factual study is made and then put the issue on the ballot to find Out how the people want their money spent. Mr. Wally Reynolds, 79-860 Fiesta Drive, commented that the controversy is not between those who want a pool and those who do not, but rather between those who want a pool and those who question the affordability of a pool. He disagreed with comments made at a previous meeting that the people of North La Quinta who live in gated- communities and have pools are selfish and uncaring about the Cove resi?dents who don't have pools. He doesn't live in a gated-community, but does have a pool which he worked many years to be able to afford and his children didn't commit crimes because they didn't have a pool. He felt that the City's funds should be used to install sewers, curbs and street improvements in the Westward Ho area that should have been done three years ago. Instead, he said, other projects such as the widening of Washington Street and the Fritz Burns Park have been classified as higher priority. He felt that the City can't afford a luxurious pool if they can't afford to repair Dune Palms Road and complete Adams Street which are vital roads. He was told that an assessment district would have to be formed to get underground utilities installed in his neighborhood, thus making those who benefit from the improvements pay their share of the cost; therefore, he suggested that those who favor a pool should be made to pay for the pool maintenance costs through an assessment district. He didn't feel that Council's responsibilities include being social directors." Mr. Fred Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, referred to Council's approval of the pool design a few years ago and asked the City Attorney if the Council's action on January 3rd to change the pool design was legal since the previous motion was not rescinded. Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that the January 3rd action was legal because the original approval was for a conceptual Master Plan. The Council is not bound by prior actions that are merely planning tools. If they wish to request additional input for a possible redesign before committing to a contract to build they may do so. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 13 February 21, 1995 Mr. Wolff commented that if the Council had stood by their action to approve the pool in December the City would be less divided and the pool would now be under construction. He felt that the public comments given at this meeting were biased and said that supporters of the pool are unable to attend because they work during the day. He believed that the opponents of the pool from North La Quinta have divided the City, not just geographically, but economically and socially. He said they didn't complain when a luxurious senior center was built, but are opposed to the City doing something for the families in the Cove. He commented that the Council committed to the pool when he was a council member and he urged the Council to not back down now. Mr. Don McCIelland, 79-815 Westward Ho Drive, commented that no significant alternatives were presented at the three public meetings, specifically utilization of the high school pool. He advised that he looked at the high school pool and felt it would be very adequate for community use. He felt that the Boys & Girls Club site would be a viable location as well. He wished to see a report of the City's finances and what its debt service is and suggested that money should not be spent until a complete review is done. Ms. Joyce Sivley, 79-775 Westward Ho Drive, commented that on January 3rd she submitted petitions signed by 120 people in opposition to the pool and now submitted an additional 54. She said that they're not opposed to recreation for children when it is affordable. She questioned if the Council had investigated the operational coSts of pools in other cities. She felt that the projected maintenance costs of the pool are frightening for a city the size of La Quinta. She didn't feel that it's fiscally prudent to continue this project simply because of a decision made at meetings held in 1992. She noted that many citizens were unaware of those meetings and only an average of 25 people attended. She was concerned that the City hasn't yet recovered from the Wymer losses She referred to economic problems plaguing other cities, counties and school districts and felt that the present economy calls for cities to cut expenses and build a strong tax base. She said that they oppose the pool because they care about the City's financial future. She commented that at the meetings held on February 6th, 8th, and 9th, 90% were opposed to the pool and did not ask for redesign. She felt that the Parks & Recreation Commission should have investigated the negative impact of pools in other cities before submitting their recommendations to the Council. She didn't feel that redesigning and downsizing the pool is a basis of sound analytical insight because of the prohibitive maintenance costs and liability. Mr. Genovese, City Manager, asked Mr. Cosper to explain the status of Adams Street and Dune Palms Road. He advised that Mr. Cosper's responsibility was only to obtain public comments for Council's consideration should they go forward with a redesign of the pool. It was not Mr. Cosper's intent nor direction to justify the construction or non- construction of the pool. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 14 February 21, 1995 Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter commented that staff's actions are only under the direction of the Council. Council Member Perkins felt that Council may not have given adequate direction to Mr. Cosper noting that he expected a series of alternatives to be presented at the three meetings as did the public. Council Member Cathcart advised that he attended all three meetings and complimented Mr. Cosper on his handling of them. Mr. Cosper advised that the Adams Street crossing is a school district project which the City is a party to. He reviewed the permitting and funding problems related to the project and advised that Granite Construction showed up to commence Construction on January 3rd, but the City issued a stop work order because of the rain, not wanting the improvements to be washed out again before completion. The school district isn't expected to issue a restart order on the project until April or May because of the concern with flooding and will take six to eight weeks to complete once started. Council Member Sniff felt it was highly unlikely that any flooding would take place during March and April and suggested that staff encourage the school district to move forward promptly. In response to Council Member Sniff, Ms. Francisco, Recreation Supervisor, advised that Mr. Bohlen, the former Parks & Recreation Director, completed a full-fledged cost recovery assumption on operating a swim program at the high school, meeting with the principal, Mr. John Gafney, and other District staff. The pool depth was a major concern because it prohibits use by small children as well as water-safety instruction. Costs for shuttle transportation provided by the District, for a 15-week program at four hours a day is $26 per hour, or $7,900 for the 15-week period. The District would also require the City to assist with maintenance cost, extra lifeguards, and security personnel. She advised that the report is available for review. Council Member Sniff asked the City Attorney to expound on the legal issue concerns regarding the December 20th vote. Ms. Honeywell advised that the decision was made to reconsider the December 20th vote because of the lack of clarity and ambiguity of Council rules. It was decided that it wouldn't be prudent to go ahead with a project that would be open to challenge. Council Member Sniff referred to a comment that he and Council Member Bangerter support the pool project and he advised that he continues to support the project. However, he represents the people of the City and not his own beliefs and will keep an open mind on the issue. Even though he supports the pool, he represents the citizens and BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 15 February 21, 1995 his personal opinions are always subordinated to the public's opinion. He continued in saying that he attended all of the public meetings, including the Parks & Recreation Commission meeting and expressed appreciation for all of the comments received. He has considered this issue very seriously and feels that the meetings did not produce a clear-cut consensus. He viewed the main issues to be the cost of the facility, the possible increase in Lighting and Landscape assessments, the location of the aquatic center and pool, the size of the facility, and whether or not it would be used to its full potential. He felt that those concerns are difficult to answer with complete clarity. Since a pool cannot be completed for use this summer, he offered the following suggestion of dividing the issue into two parts: * Phase 1-A which would not include the pool nor aquatics building, but would include the necessary underground plumbing for a pool, landscaping, street work and parking. * Phase 1 B complete the pool and aquatic facility He felt that this proposal will allow adequate time to review the pool issues and yet could be constructed in time for next year's use. The issues that he felt should be dealt with are: 1) the current proposed pool or modified facility 2) the location of the pool if built 3) the feasibility of an outside operator 4) consider the cost-savings from these possible changes 5) other means of financing such as a Mello Roos District He supported the current location and preferred only moderate modifications to the pool as he believes that the aquatics building, shade structures, and bleachers are needed. He felt that if the pool is downsized drastically it will change the appeal to an outside operator. He suggested that the issue be placed on the ballot for an advisory vote in November, 1995 to give everyone an opportunity to give their input and he would support the result of that vote. Council Member Perkins questioned how long the Council is going to prolong the issue because he felt that the citizens have spoken and a decision should be made He suggested that each council member should talk to representatives from Palm Springs or Indio who will tell them, do not build a pool." He questioned how much of the $900,000 cost referred to in the staff report is for stubbing-in of the underground plumbing for a future pool. With a budget session coming up soon, he felt that the Council should be looking at the cost of this pool. He was surprised that so few people attended the three meetings, especially those held at the middle school and senior center BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 16 February 21, 1995 facility, noting that those who live in the Cove or support the pool had their opportunity to speak at these evening meetings. He challenged the report prepared by the Parks & Recreation Department regarding the use of the high school pool and felt it was one- sided. He referred to Council Member Sniff's statement that the pool cannot be completed in time to be used for this year's season and said that was the first time that he had heard that the pool would not be operational year-round. He believed that the park itself should be completed, but was opposed to including the underground plumbing. He wasn't opposed to a pool, but was against the cost and is open to alternatives. He opposed placing the issue on the ballot for an advisory vote because he felt that it's the Council's responsibility to make that decision and they have received enough input to make a decision. Council Member Cathcart advised that he, too, attended the three meetings and listened to the tape recording of the Parks & Recreation Commission meeting and he heard loud and clear that the City needs to be responsible with its finances. He also heard from many who would like to have a pool in La Quinta; He felt that the City should be able to fmd a balance between those two opinions, but personally didn't feel that the current pool design and cost is that balance. He was encouraged by the possibility of locating a pool at the Boys & Girls Club, because the City doesn't have experience in operating a pool and other entities do. He felt that the City should communicate with them to gain from their experience and knowledge. He was opposed to a referendum because he felt that it would further divide the citizens of La Quinta and could possibly delay having a pool completed by the next season. Council Member Bangerter commented that the issue is a difficult one to decide because there is no crystal ball to answer many of the unanswerable questions and the issue is an emotional one. The issue affects everyone emotionally because it affects our families, our finances, where we live, what we think, and our relationships with other people in the community. She believed that fiscal responsibility is a broad term that not only means balancing a checkbook, but it means spending the money where it will accomplish the most good. Fiscal responsibility is a huge responsibility because the City isn't in the business of just being a business, but is a community that has social concerns as well, because its citizens are people and not numbers or dollar signs. The City is responsible for dealing with the community's social needs as well as the finances. She, too, was opposed to placing the issue on a ballot because of the divisiveness of the issue already and believes the Council is responsible for the decision. She advised that the City has always been supportive of activities for its senior citizens and youth through services such as the Boys & Girls Club and YMCA. However, she added, it's important to support family activities that will unite families because that's what our community is about. She continues to be committed to the Fritz Burns Park pool and the community. She is open to alternate suggestions and has spoken to the Boys & Girls Club about a pool there, to which she felt there are pros and cons. She has talked to agencies who have experience with operating pools, such as the YMCA and the City of Temecula, and BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 17 February 21, 1995 is unsure that eliminating the slide was the best idea because, even though it's a liability, it's also a great revenue source. She said that she has a large pool in her yard and because she supports family swimming, it is very busy during the summer from use by families in her neighborhood who can't afford their own pool. She hasn't changed her commitment to the pool, and is open to other options. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Cosper advised that it will cost under $10,000 to stub in plumbing, electrical conduit and sewer lines for future pool installation. These lines would not include wiring, but blank conduit only. Council Member Cathcart asked what the cost would be if those lines were installed after completion of the park. Mr. Cosper advised that the cost would then be $20?000 to $25,000 because of demolition of the sidewalks. Council Member Sniff supported advisory votes stating that they give the public an opportunity to go on record and they aren't necessarily divisive. He trusts the public and is willing to go along with their decision because he works for them. Council Member Cathcart said it isn't the vote that would be divisive, but rather the campaign for the vote. The purpose of the three forums was to receive a consensus from the public, but the forums are being discounted because of the low turnout. Council Member Perkins concurred. He advised that he would support moving forward with the park and stubbing in the underground plumbing for a possible future pool since the cost to install that plumbing at a later date would double. He asked about the pool's proposed months of operation. In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Genovese advised that the pool was proposed as a year-round concept that would be closed during some periods of the year. The operational period would be taken under consideration during any analysis for redesign. Its use would need to be determined and programming of funds could be utilized before its final concept could be formulated. He advised that once the Council forms a consensus, staff will take Council's direction as it relates to alternate locations, other operators, or additional analysis regarding use of the high school pool. He advised that the park construction could move forward with or without the stubbing-in of the underground plumbing. If Council decides against constructing a pool at this location, the area could be utilized as a green space or other park uses. Mr. Cosper advised that the Master Plan includes a recreation building to be constructed during Phase 2 and the underground plumbing will be needed at that time. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 18 February 21, 1995 Council Member Cathcart asked if the current parking lot plan would be satisfactory if a decision is made to not construct the pool. Mr. Genovese advised that it would be satisfactory according to the Parks & Recreation's concept, but Council will have the opportunity to review the new design before it goes out to bid. Staff also will have the Parks & Recreation Commission review it for their consensus Council Member Sniff reiterated his suggestion for continuing the project in two phases, Phase 1-A and Phase 1-B and wished to see it move forward with some level of dispatch. Council Member Cafficart asked for a clarification of Phase 1-B. Council Member Sniff?advised that Phase 1-B would deal with the pool, tot pool and related aquatic facilities, allowing adequate time to make the decisions that will allow for the construction of these facilities in a prompt manner, but not necessarily next year. Among the issues are: 1) deciding upon the current proposed or redesigned pool, 2) deciding whether to locate the pool in Fritz Burns Park or an alternate location such as the Boys & Girls Club, to which he has concerns regarding the distance and financially capability, 3) investigate the possibility of outside operators, 4) review the cost savings made in this process, and 5) investigate other means of financing. Phase 1-B would not be a commitment to go forward with the pool, but rather a commitment to evaluate it in a realistic manner. In response to Council Member Cathcart, Mr. Genovese advised that staff would need a minimum of 30 days for review. Council Member Cathcart felt it was important that staff receive explicit direction from Council so as to minimize confusion. Council Member Perkins supported giving staff direction to proceed with plans to construct the park and stub-in the minimum underground plumbing for a future pool. Mr. Genovese advised that staff will review the recreation building planned for Phase 2 and its relationship to the balance of the facility before going out to bid. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sm If/Perkins to direct staff to redesign the Fritz Burns Park without the pool and aquatic center and stubbing in the necessary underground work, reporting back to Council in one month. Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter advised that she would vote against the motion because she believed that the pool should already be under construction. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 19 February 21, 1995 Motion carried with Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter voting NO. MINUTE ORDER NO.95- 44. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff?Perkins to direct staff to look at the issues that Council Member Sniff previously brought up, that being a current or modified redesign of the pool looking at an approximately 25% downsizing of the pool, looking at location, outside Operation, cost savings that could be derived from these changes, and other financing means, and report back to Council within 60 days. Council Member Perkins was concerned with the wording of the motion, the issues that Council Member Sniff brought up." Council Member Sniff clarified that he was referring to the same items that he outlined in the motion, such as location, etc. and would withdraw that portion of the motion. The motion was then restated as follows: MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to direct staff to look at the current or modified redesign of the pool looking at an approximately 25% downsizing of the pool, looking at location, outside operation, cost savings that could be derived from these changes, and other financing means, and report back to Council within 60 days. Council Member Perkins didn't want it to be misunderstood that he now supports the swimming pool, but is committing only to study staff's report concerning Phase 1-B with no pre-determined opinion. In response to Council Member Cathcart, Mr. Genovese advised that staff will provide an update for Council at the next meeting. Council Member Sniff suggested that periodic reports be given to Council during the 60- day period. Mr. Cosper clarified that staff may submit more than one or two designs reducing the size of the pool other than the 25%. Council Member Sniff wished to clarify that the only commitment in th? motion is to explore the issues relating to the construction of a pool. Motion carried unammously MINIY'E ORDER NO.95-45. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 20 February 21, 1995 REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL IThMS All reports were noted and filed. DEPARTMENT REPORTS 1. UPDATE ON ONCE WEEKLY CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS DISPOSAL Noted and filed. 2 SIx-MONTH REPORT ON ONE-WAY TRAFFIC AROUND THE VILLAGE COMMUNITY PARK. Council Member Catlicart abstained due to a conflict of interest. Mr. Cosper, Public Works Director, advised that no complaints had been received by staff regarding the temporary one-way traffic design around the Village Park which the City instituted six months ago and recommended that the one-way traffic design be continued. Council Member Sniff commented that major concerns were mentioned by business owners in The Village on January 23rd, at the Chamber Workshop meeting and he asked if any letters of opposition were received from the Chamber. Mr. Cosper advised that he hadn't received the letter. Ms. Michelle Dallas, Executive Director of La Quinta Chamber of Commerce, referred to letters of recommendations that were written prior to Council's decision to institute the temporary one-way traffic. Opposition at that time was mostly from businesses located around the park who felt that the oneway traffic pattern would be detrimental to their businesses. Council Member Sniff advised that the recent comments show that the concerns are still there. Council Member Bangerter advised that the Council needs to be made aware if there is a consensus of opposition to the one-way traffic. In response to Council Member Cathcart, Ms. Dallas advised that some of those opposing the issue are members of the task force as well as having businesses in The BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 21 February 21, 1995 Village. Council Member Sniff suggested that the Chamber request a current recommendation form the Chamber Task Force since significant concerns were expressed during the January task force meeting. Council Member Perkins cornmented that the one-way traffic pattern is less than one-half mile long and has provided a bike and jogging lane, more orderly parking, and safer street crossing by children. He felt that staff had done a good job with the signage. Council Member Sniff advised that earlier on this day he had witnessed a large truck going in the wrong direction around the park. He wasn't convinced that it's totally functional noting that his car has almost been hit from drivers not stopping going east on Montezuma. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1. CHARThR CITY UPDATh. Council Member Perkins felt that we should be doing something about this issue due to the time constraints with the election. Mrs. Juhola advised that August 11th is the deadline for placing an issue on the ballot, but it should be done sooner in order to give ample time for ballot arguments. Council concurred on discussing this matter further at the second meeting in March. 2. DISCUSSION OF INTERSECTION OF JEFFERSON STREET AND WESTWARD HO DRIVE Council Member Perkins believed that there needs to be a four-way stop at Jefferson and Westward Ho Drive and asked Mr. Cosper to report on this situation. Mr. Cosper advised that half of this intersection is in Indio. The other problem is that this is a golf cart crossing. A traffic count was completed in November which found that warrants were not met for a four-way stop, but signal warrants were met under three conditions. Under the traffic manual, you can install a four-way stop prior to installing signals on an interim basis. The City of Indio has been contacted and they have expressed concerned about liability in the absence of warrants being met. They have BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 22 February 21, 1995 asked that if the City could indicate a time-line in terms of a signal, they may be agreeable to going ahead and also wished to see red flashers. 3. Council Member Perkins commented on the intersection of Washington and Highway 111 in which motorists are using the left-turn lane as a third lane. He asked if something can be done and Mr. Cosper advised that staff will try to do something on a temporary basis as well as try to push the project through. 4. Council Member Perkins questioned the status of Adams south) and Highway 111 and Mr. Cosper advised that bids are due on Monday. 5. Council Member Sniff wished to make all the documents relating to the auto mall available to the public. Mayor Pena and Council Member Perkins agreed. The City Attorney was asked to report back on the confidentiality of these materials. Council recessed to Closed Session to and until the hour of 7:00 p.m. CLOSED SESSION 1. Conference with legal counsel regarding on-going litigation with attorney concerning Hudson vs. the City of La Quinta under Govermnent Code Section 54956.9. Council reconvened with no reportable action being taken. 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT Gertrude Cheney, 54-255 Avenida Carranza, expressed concern about the redevelopment issue on the agenda and Mayor Pena advised her that staff will be giving a full report later in the agenda. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 23 February 21, 1995 PUBLIC HEARINGS RESOLUTION ADOPTING PROPOSALS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT CDBG) YEAR 21 FUNDS. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that the City expects to receive about $120,000 in Year 21 funds and staff recommends that an application be submitted to utilize the funds for additional parking for the senior center. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. There being no one wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. RESOLUTION NO.95-09 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFOIINIA, ADOPTING PROPOSALS, REPROGRAMMING FUNDS, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT AN APPLICATION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT YEAR 21 FUNDS. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to adopt Resolution No.95-09 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. 2. TENTATIVE TRACT 28118 RESUBDIVIDING VACANT CONDOMINIUM LOTS INTO 35 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS, TIIREE MAINTENANCE YARD LOTS, AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS LOTS ON HERMITAGE, EAST OF INThRLACHEN, WITHIN PGA WEST. APPLICANT: KSL RECREATION CORPORATION. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, presented staff report describing the location of the proposed project within PGA West. He advised that the project was previou?y approved as a condominium tract for Landmark and KSL is now requesting resubdivis ion into 35 single-family lots plus some common lots. The Planning Commission reviewed the map and expressed concern about restroom facilities for the maintenance people and there is going to be an additional facility constructed. The Planning Commission has recommended approval subject to conditions. Mr. Herman advised that the applicant wishes to address Conditions No.21 and 65. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 24 February 21, 1995 Condition No.21 addresses vacating access rights to Avenue 58. There is a plan to redesign Avenue 58 to come into Jefferson at a different configuration. The concern tllis poses is that the maintenance yard would not have access to new 58, but would have access old 58 right of way to access the maintenance yard outside the private gate. The condition has been changed to require the applicant to vacate access rights to the realigned Avenue 58 from abutting lots. Regarding Condition No.65, the applicant is requesting that the restroom facility is to be completed prior to the issuance of the first certificate of occupancy as opposed to the first building permit being issued. Staff did not have a problem with either condition. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. Lloyd Watson, Engineer, representing KSL, advised that they agree with all recommended conditions with the revisions as reviewed by Mr. Herman. There being no one else wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. RESOLUTION NO.95-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT 2S118 TO ALLOW THE CREATION OF A LAND SALES SUBDIVISION ON A 4.?ACRE SITE AT PGA WEST. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to adopt Resolution No.95-10 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. Council recessed to Redevelopment Agency meeting. Council reconvened and meet jointly with the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency. JOINT MEETING WITH THE LA OUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 3. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING ON THE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE LA QUINTA PROJECT NO.1 AS AMENDED BY AMENDMENT NO.1 AND THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT RELATED THERETO. Council Members Bangerter and Cathcart abstained due to conflicts of interests. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 25 February 21, 1995 Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that Council Members Bangerter and Catlicart will be abstaining from this matter as they both have property interests within the project area that are different from the public generally. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. Mayor Pena advised that this joint public hearing of the City Council and the Redevelopment Agency is to consider the proposed Amendment No. 1 to the Redevelopment Plan for the La Quinta Redevelopment Project No.1 and certification of the Final Environmental Impact Report on the Amendment. He further advised that the following documents will be under consideration: 1. The proposed Redevelopment Plan as amended by Amendment No.1; and 2. Agency Report to Council on the proposed Amendment, which includes, among other information: a. The report and recommendation of the Planning Commission; b. The report and recommendation of the Project Area Committee; c. The Final Environmental Impact Report on the Project. Mr. Spevacek, Consultant with Rosenow, Spevacek Group, advised that the purpose of this hearing is to gain input on the proposed amendment to Redevelopment Project Area 1 Plan which was established in 1983. Since that time, the Redevelopment Agency has spent about $35 million in improvements around the Cove and $4 million in housing assistance. Basically, we're faced with a position wherein the Agency's financial capacity has reached its limit. He briefly reviewed some of the events that have transpired up to this time in preparation for this hearing. Basically, redevelopment is a tool provided by the State for cities and counties to address problem areas within their jurisdictions. The Agency receives it money from tax increment revenues. When a project area is established, the County Assessor adds up the current value of all properties within that project area which then becomes known as the base year value. Pursuant to Prop 13, properties can only be reassessed if sold or improved and up to 2% a year to account for inflation. So the difference between what the values were in 1983 and what they are in 1995 translates into tax increment revenues which is allocated to the Agency. Additionally, these tax increments are also allocated to other affected agencies. In 1993, the Agency evaluated Project No.1 and determined that there are still needed public infrastructure as well as public/private partnerships to jump-start economic development activities in The Village. Consequently, the decision was made to amend the plan. By doing so, the tax increment revenue will increase from $300 million to $2 billion and to increase the amount of bond debt from $35 million to $100 million and to expand the eminent domain authority to run to 2007. The redevelopment project is set to expire in 2025 and the agency can undertake no additional project that requires tax increment revenue to pay for the projects after the year 2004. Regarding eminent BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 26 February 21, 1995 domain, the agency has only used it once to acquire right of way for Calle Tampico widening. Mr. Martin, Consultant, with Stevenson, Porto & Pierce, reviewed the environmental process noting that the notice of preparation was mailed to all affected public agencies. A draft EIR was then prepared and mailed for a 45-day public review period. During that period, there were four comments received and the City prepared responses to them. The EIR evaluates the potential environmental impacts that could occur should implementation of the plan occur. Mr. Spevacek asked that the following documents be entered into the public record: a. The Report to the City Council on the Development Plan for the La Quinta Redevelopment Project as amended by Amendment No.1; b. The Redevelopment Plan as proposed to be Amended by Amendment No.1; and c. The Final EIR At this time the City Clerk advised that letters of comments have been received from the following individuals: 1. Nial Morgan, dated January 19, 1995 2. Richard Earl Bean/Nan Glennon Bean, dated February 6, 1995 3. Irvin Chapman, dated January 23, 1995 4. Fred Olds, dated January 24, 1995 Also, a letter was received this evening from Coachella Valley Water District which the City. Clerk read into the record. At this time, the Mayor asked if there was any public testimony. PROPONENTS SCOTT DALECIO, Vice Chairman of the Project Area Committee, advised that their committee was brought together several months ago They feel that they have represented various elements of the community and have gone through the plan and EIR and feel that proper due diligence has taken place and provide the continued impetus on the continued construction of infrastructure that is needed. Therefore, they suggest that the City continue to move forward with the Plan Amendment. OPPONENTS None Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney/Agency Counsel, advised that this hearing will be continued to March 7, 1995 and in the interim, staff will be responding to all letters BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 27 February 21, 1995 received. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to continue this item to a joint meeting on March 7, 1995 to adopt the written responses to the written objections to the amended plan and further consideration of the amended plan and the fmal EIR. Motion carried with Council Members Bangerter and Cathcart ABSTMNING. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-46. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Re pe;t?llY submitted, SAUNDRA L. J OLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California BIB] 12-12-95-U01 09:38:05AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 02-U02 21-U02 95-U02