Loading...
1995 04 04 CC Minutes LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 4, 1995 Regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council on April 4, 1995 was called to order at the hour of 3:00 p.m. by Mayor Pena, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Council Members Bangerter, Cathcart, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena ABSENT: None CO??ON OF AGENDA Ms Honeywell, City Attorney, recommended adding as Business Item No.6, the consideration of a donation from KSL Recreation for one guest pass to the Legends Golf Tournament. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Banger:erlcathcar: to add as Business Item No. 6, a donation from KSL Recreation for one ticket to the Legends Golf Tournament as the need to take action arose after the agenda was posted. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION It was moved by Council Members Bangerter/Cathcart to approve the City Council Minutes of March 21.1995 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Pena commented on the success of the Soap Box Derby held on March 25th, and expressed appreciation to all the volunteers and co-chairpersons, Lucia Moran and Don Berry, who worked hard on the event. Council Member Bangerter advised that she recently attended the Kidsline Advisory Board meeting and announced that this year's telephone calls and responses doubled last year's first quarter totals. PRESENTATIONS None BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 2 April 4, 1995 PUBLIC COMMENTS Ms. Audrey Ostrowsky, P.O. Box 351, was concerned that the Chamber of Commerce was responding to the creation of a one-way street around the park without consulting the businesses in that area. She also commented on her dismissal from the Chamber which she felt was due to her vocalness on such issues. She suggested that the City's commercial development would grow if commercial businesses weren't allowed to operate in residential areas. She questioned why the City continues to use her land for parking during the La Quinta Arts Festival. Mr. Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, thanked the City for supporting the inaugural event of the Soap Box Derby and advised that four different communities were represented within the top five winners. Ms. Joyce Sivley, 79-775 Westward Ho, thanked the City for recently installing a four-way stop at Jefferson Street and Westward Ho Drive. Mayor Pena advised that the City of Indio also participated in that installation and expressed appreciation to them. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE 1. LETTER FROM INLAND EMPIRE SMALL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER REGARDING A CONTRIBUTION TOWARD PROVISION OF COACHELLA VALLEY SERVICES. Noted and filed. 2. LETTER FROM DESERT HOLOCAUST MEMORIAL COMMITTEE REGARDING CONTRIBUTION. Mr. Earl Greif, S Deerfield Court, advised that he is a holocaust survivor and spent much time in concentration camps in Poland. He referred to the atrocities and horrors that took place during that era of time because of ignorance, hatred. and bigotry. He advised that a Holocaust Memorial is being constructed at the Palm Desert Civic Center Park which he felt will be a fantastic tool to teach children to love instead of hate. He respectfully requested the Council to join the Cities of Rancho Mirage, Palm Desert, and Palm Springs in contributing funds for the memorial and have La Quinta's name inscribed on the memorial as a participant. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 3 April 4, 1995 Mr. Jack Sobelman, 52-815 Avenida Martinez, was opposed to the City contributing to the memorial and suggested that contributions be done on an individual basis by the citizens of the City. He felt that the City has more pressing problems to address. Mr. Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta Drive, agreed with Mr. Sobelman's comments regarding personal contributions and felt that pleasurable and current events should be memorialized instead of the horrors of the past. He commented on the need for separation of church and State and urged the Council to deny the request. Mr. ed Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, commented that he was shocked at the last two comments. He advised that his family fled Germany duning the war and some members of his family committed suicide to avoid the brutality of the camps. He felt that the holocaust was an unequalled event of brutality in history. He didn't believe that it's a matter of memorializing horrible events, but rather a reminder that such atrocities should never happen again. He felt that a contribution to this memorial would reflect the citizenry of the community. He said that there is more to running a City than building streets or recreational facilities. He urged the Council to respond in a positive manner to the request. Ms. Trice Healey, 54455 Eisenhower Drive, stated that the holocaust is a part of history and she felt that history should be remembered. She urged the Council to. support the requested contribution. Mr. Enrique Gutierrez, 52-287 Avenida Ramirez, stated that he was appalled at some of the previous comments and didn't believe that the issue is a religious one. He believed that all people have a right to live in freedom and that the memorial might help those with cold hearts realize that the holocaust was a mistake that shouldn't be repeated. He urged the Council to support the request. Ms. Kay Wolff, 77-227 CalIe Ensenada, supported the contribution to the memorial because she believed that it's the government's business to demonstrate it's support or non-support for historical events. She felt that the holocaust happened because governments failed to take a stand and said she would be proud to have the City's name on such a monument. Mr. Don McCIelland, 79-815 Westward Ho Drive, stated that genocide is something that governments do when things get out of control and the genocide that took place during the holocaust is only a fraction of the genocide that has taken place during the past 80 years. Mr. Steve Sinjonsen, 54-665 Avenida Ramirez, commented that as a college professor, he found that there is ignorance among students regarding the holocaust and he urged the Council to combat that ignorance by keeping the memory alive through a contribution to the memorial. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 4 April 4, 1995 Mr. Earl Greif, stated that the monument is not intended for one particular race or religion, but rather includes 12,000 Christian Gentiles who helped save lives during the holocaust. He advised that a priest and minister serve on the memorial committee. Mayor Pefla commented that he had the honor of representing the valley on a trip to Israel a few years ago where he visited the monument there and had never had a more moving experience. He supported the requested contribution because it's imperative to not forget history, for those who forget it are condemned to repeat it. Council Member Bangerter advised that she visited the Museum of Tolerance in Los Angeles which is half devoted to the holocaust and half to bigotry alone. She felt that the exhibit added to her education and she supported a contribution because the holocaust is a part of history that shouldn't be forgotten. Council Member Sniff commented that it's not an ethnic issue, but rather a matter of humanity. He felt that both the good and bad of history should be remembered and that the memorial is worthwhile, serving to remind us of the terrible actions brought upon humanity. He felt that La Quinta's contribution to the memorial will remind everyone that La Quinta does not stand for racial intolerance, brutality, nor bigotry and he supported a reasonable contribution. Mayor Pena recommended forwarding the request to staff for a report back and said he would support a $1,000 contribution. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to refer the contribution request by Desert Holocaust Memorial Committee to staff for clarification and to be brought back at the next meeting. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-65. BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSWERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO REQUEST PROPOSALS TO COMPLETE A COMMUNITY POOL IEASIBILITY REPORT. Mayor Pen a abstained from the issue due to a conflict of interest and left the d?is. Mr. Cosper, Public Works Director, advised that on March 21, 1995, Council directed staff to develop the use of an independent consultant to prepare a feasibility report for the purpose of atialyzing the City's pool needs and determine on-going costs. Staff proposed addressing the feasibility report in two phases. Phase I will include the development of local and statewide databases of public swimming pools and look at pool characteristics, special attractions, aquatic programs, related costs, community characteristics, and public and private operators. Using the information gathered, a BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 5 April 4, 1995 typical pool facility standard will be determined and pool configurations will be developed. In Phase II, the optimum facility configuration and operating parameters for a pool will be determined. Phase I will take eight weeks to complete and will be brought back to the Council before proceeding with Phase II, which will be completed in nine weeks. He advised that staff has been discussing this report with Berryman and Henniger formerly BSI), who recenfly prepared a similar report for Lake Tahoe Regional Park District. They already have a database consisting of Southern California, statewide and nationwide information; The total cost of the feasibility report is $19,540. Staff recommended that Council approve the authorization to request proposals to complete a Community Pool Feasibility Report and authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement to complete the Feasibility Report. Mr. Jack Sobelman, 52-815 Avenida Martinez, commented on the liability concerns related to a public swimming pool and felt that those wanting a pool should build one on their own property. He felt that the City has too much at stake and too little back-up financing to proceed with this project. Ms. Nancy Nard, 78-636 Bottlebrush Drive, spoke in support of the pool and advised that she had assisted in the planning of it for the last three years through her service on the Community Services Commission. She was concerned that the City is going backwards instead of forward with this project because construction costs will continue to escalate with delays, making construction of the pool an impossibility. She urged the Council to examine all of the options and resolve the problems related to the project. Mr. Ernie Brazil, 44-500 Buttercup, spoke in opposition to the pool and in support of additional police officers. Mr. Don McClelland, 79-815 Westward Ho Drive, was opposed to the pool and the proposed feasibility report. He felt that there should be a cost-analysis of other cities successes and failures with similar projects. He commented that those wanting new services from the government are usually more persistent than those who don't and felt that his generation's irresponsible spending spree showed no regard for fliture generations. He said that genocide occurs when government gets out of hand and he urged the Council to delay further studies until the City's finances have been reviewed. He also referred to the Boys & Girls Club proposal to build a pool and said he would like to know more about that proposal. Ms. Joyce SivIey, 79-775 Westward Ho Drive, said that she understood that the Council wouldn't be taking action on the pool for 60 days while estimates were being obtained on the downsizing of the pool. She said that the City can't afford a pool or any more reports on the issue. She stated that the economy has changed since the pool was originally conceived and felt that the City's money should be spent on needed street improvements. She was concerned that the children of today won't be able to afford BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 6 April 4, 1995 maintenance costs of a pool tomorrow. She urged the Council to think of the overall cost to the whole City. Mr. Fred Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, stated that the pool is a dream of the vast majority of the people in the community and referred to petitions of support submitted at the last meeting. He realized that fmance is always a big issue, but noted that funds are already earmarked for this project and no additional taxes will be needed for construction of the pool. He commented that the YMCA is interested in operating the pool and are insured. He believed that leadership means taaang risks when it's for the good of the community and doing otherwise is a dis-service to the community. He said that those who will use the pool can't afford to build their own because they are low to moderate income families. He felt that there is a need and funds available to build a pool and urged the Council to approve it as originally designed. He advised that they are in the process of preparing for an initiative if the Council fails to go forward with the pool. Mr. Robert Metkus, questioned how many signatures on the petition of support for the pool were non-homeowners, children, or from Indio. He asked for substantiation of the $1 million set aside for the pool, commenting that such substantiation would perhaps quiet the opposition. He didn't feel that the City is ready to invest $8 million due to the slowing economy. He urged the Council to represent all of La Quinta and not just one district. Ms. Trice Healey, 54455 Eisenhower Drive, felt that the need for a pool had been established. She said that a pool will help keep children busy during the summer and keep them out of trouble. She and her family are willing to help in any way necessary to make the pool a reality, including an additional assessment on their property. She understood fiscal responsibility, but believed that there are creative ways to handle the COStS involved with the pool, such as involving the YMCA. She cornmented that the City wouldn't have anything if it's actions were always determined by liability concerns and urged the Council to not let that concern be a deterrent in approving a pool. She stated that the original pool plans cost the City a lot of money and should be used. She suggested that a shorter operation pe?iod be considered to cut coSts instead of downsizing the pool. She also felt that the Parks & Recreation Department is very important and should be retained. Ms. Becky Kochell, 52-770 Avenida Villa, commented that she has been active in various recreation activities for the youth for years and found that it's increasingly. difficult to find activities for children during the summer. She felt that a pool would help keep children active and involved. She appreciated the Council's concern regarding fiscal responsibility and felt that a pool will add to the quality of life for the cornmunity. She believed that a pool and the Parks & Recreation Department are vital to the community. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 7 April 4, 1995 Mr. Pete Plat?mone, 79-575 Marigold Lane, spoke in opposition to the pool and expressed concern about the City's increase in crime. He was also concerned about the lack of access roads in North La Quinta. He stated that he's not anti-family nor anti- children, but is concerned about the City's fiscal responsibility. He commented that the Council failed to accept his previbus suggestion to put the issue on the ballot because they felt it would polarize the community, but he felt that it's already happening. Mr. Jeff Sinith, 54-631 Avenida Alvarado, spoke in support of the pool. He felt that comments made at previous meetings about some residents wanting a pool for a babysittitig scrvice were myopic and very short-sighted. He believed that a pool recreational program will maintain the community spirjt, keep children occupied in a positive manner, and serve as a center for community activity which is vitally important. He felt that a community pool will be a major positive force in the City and it would be short-sighted for the City to not look to the future. He hoped that the pool would be completed by the summer of 96. Ms. Kay Wolff, 77-227 Calle Ensenada, supported the feasibility study. However, she believed that some of the information should be available from studies conducted during the last few years by the City's commissions and she encouraged the Council to expedite the process so that a pool is ready by the summer of 1996. She believed that a pool will help solidify the community and supported a public/private partnership in the operation of a pool. She felt that it's important to construct the pool in an area easily accessible to children with bikes. She encouraged the Council to not get bogged" down with too much study of the issue and move forward as quickly as possible. Mr. Robert Tyler, 44?15 Villeta Drive, commented how property taxes continue to increase each year. He supported the study and felt that it will be money well-spent because it will explore the opportunity to get outside agencies involved in a possible joint-venture. He's not opposed to an affordable pool in the Cove, but is opposed to the gold-plated" one originally proposed. He encouraged the Council to move forward with an objective study. Ms. Terry Henderson, 54-711 Eisenhower Drive, supported a privately-operated pool as opposed to a City?operated one. She was opposed to residents having to make a lifetime commitment to pool costs. She supported the feasibility study because she felt that the present economy mandates a current study with current data to base a decision upon. She believed that there are innovative ways to solve this issue and encouraged the community to wait for the results of the feasibility report. Ms. Rosita Sharnus, 78-955 Del Monte Court, believed that the City of La Quinta draws people to the community who care. She believed that a healthy community must have a healthy environment and not look to short-term solutions for the future. She believed that the children are the City's future and need an opportunity to participate in healthy activities such as education, involvement in community activities, and swimming BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes S April 4, 1995 recreation. She felt that creative ways such as fundraising events and joint ventures should be utilized to make the community pool a reality, which will help make a healthy environment for the community. Mr. Enrique Gutierrez, 52-257 Avenida Ramirez, commented that many of the residents are getting impatient with the issue and urged the Council to look at what's happening in the community. He said that families with children represent the majority of La Quinta and those families will submit additional petitions supporting the pool if necessary. He understood the liability concern, but noted that the YMCA operates many pools across the nation, demonstrating that it's a concern that can be resolved. As a juvenile counselor he's aware of increasing youth involvement in crime and wasn't advocating that a pool will stop such crime. However, he felt that the City should put its priorities in line and remember that the children of La Quinta are the City's future and the City should focus its attention to their needs. Ms. Kathy Pedersen, 54-455 Avenida Rubjo, stated that she's becoming impatient with the issue. She recently obtained 100+ signatures on a petition in just two hours from many residents who thought that the pool was a *?done deal. She didn't care who operates the pool, but felt that the Fritz Burns Park is the best location for it. She was in support of the Parks & Recreation Department remaining intact and urged the Council to approve the pool as soon as possible, noting that the longer it's delayed. the more it will cost. Mr. Steve Simonsen, 54-665 Avenida Ramirez, spoke in support of the pool, commenting that taking risks is a part of leadership and a part of history. He advised that everyone benefits today from risks taken by previous leaders in history and urged the Council to be leaders in this issue. Council Member Sniff asked the City Manager to confirm that there is a line-item in the budget for $1 million and asked how much interest the Landmark donation had gained. Mr. Genovese, City Manager, advised that he wasn't sure of the exact amount, but confirmed that approximately $1 million is earmarked for the project. In response to Mr. Genovese, Mr. Cosper advised that as of December 20th, the amount in that fund was $1,135,572, noting that some engmeering costs have been funded from that account since then. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Cosper confirmed that added interest and costs funded from that account are reflected in that amount which began with an original donation from Landmark in the amount of $1 million. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 9 April 4, 1995 In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Genovese advised that the City currently has three shifts of police officers as well as the Target Team, a School Resource Officer, and a Community Service Officer as part of the City's police protection service. Council Member Sniff stated that the issue at hand is one of analytical accountability and not a decision of whether or not to build a pool. He felt that a feasibility study is the logical action to take at this time as it will bring the issue into sharp focus at the end of 17 weeks. The Council will then be able to make an informed decision on the issue. Council Member Perkins wished to include in the report, the feasibility of developing an assessment district to flind the additional construction costs over and above the $1 million) and maintenance of the pool. He said that this would allow the costs to be borne by those in the Cove who want a pool, noting that some had voiced that they were willing to pay additional taxes if needed. He advised that the assessment for 3,500 residential Cove units would be $7/month for maintenance costs and $23/month for the first year only to cover an additional $1 million needed to construct the pool. He suggested issuance of entrance cards to homeowners within the assessment district and a general admission fee for all other users. His concern was that the City be able to afford the construction and maintenance of a pool. Council Member Cathcart stated that he wasn't comfortable with proceeding with the feasibility study and felt that it was premature because the study is designed to determine what type of pool should be built, rather than whether or not to build one. Based on his research, he believed that the funds could be spent more efficiently for the youth in other ways. He supported re-analyzing the Parks & Recreation Department in terms of determining what the recreational needs of the community are. He was concerned that the City's finds will be limited in the future and was convinced that the City can do a better job of providing for the youth. Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter?continued to support the pool. She supported the feasibility study even though the issue has been studied for a long time, because it will address her concerns regarding the operational aspect of the pool. She referred to a newspaper article during her campaign which stated that she stressed community ties and she advised that she still believes that that is extremely important and part of being fiscally responsible. She believed that safety must be the City's number one concern, but the City should be proactive and not just reactive. She felt that a lot of work has gone into the Parks & Recreation Department to address the specific needs of the community and continued to support that department and the need to keep the community ties intact. She reiterated her support for the feasibility study because she believed that it will provide the needed assessments to complete a project that makes sense for the community. Council Member Cathcart advised that he strongly supports the Parks & Recreation Departinent and believed that the money proposed for the pool could be spent more effectively by that department. He felt that the feasibility study would be a waste of BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 10 April 4, 1995 money and would not support it. He suggested that further action be delayed until the new Parks & Recreation Director is on staff, letting him analyze the department and identify the best way to spend the money for the benefit of the people. He advised that Palm Desert has a vast tax base, but is preparing a feasibility study before proceeding with construction of a pool. He stated that La Quinta is a smaller City with limited funds. He felt that it's important to re-analyze the pool issue and was opposed to a feasibility study at this time. Council Member Perkins said he will continue to support the Parks & Recreation Depar?ent with the proper number of people on staff and the Parks & Recreation Commission because they are vital to the cornmunity. He would be opposed to a Parks & Recreation Department consisting of 25 people given the size of the City, but felt that the department is needed to supervise the recreational needs of the community. He advised that the $1 million Landmark donation was set aside for parks, recreation, and/or a swimming pool and questioned the actual amount in that fund. He didn't feel that it's the Council's responsibility to take unnecessary risks as done by other agencies such as Orange County, but rather believed that the decision to not take risks is where the leadership is. He felt that the Council is responsible for making decisions the City can afford, regardless of the number of names on a petition. He advised that the City's major tax generator is the La Quinta Hotel and pointed out that the City would suffer great consequences if it should fail. He supported Council Member Cathcart's position on the issue. He felt that the City has a very good recreation program. He said that a pool will not end the City's graffiti problem because the pool won't be open during the late hours that taggers" work. He emphasized that he wasn't against the pool and reiterated his suggestion of an assessment district to finance the pool. Council Member Sniff asked if assessment financing could be included in the feasibility study, commenting that he was concerned about assessing the cost to Cove residents only because municipal means the entire City. He referred to his previous suggestion that the matter be placed on the ballot and advised that sooner or later the community will have to decide the issue and he believed that an assessment district would set-up that possibility. In response to Council Member Perkins, Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that public improvements can be set-up as an assessment district and the required studies would recommend how the costs should be spread based on benefit. Council Member Sniff supported including an assessment district as part of the study. Council Member Perkins asked if use of identification cards by homeowners within an assessment district for pool entrance would be possible. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 11 April 4, 1995 Ms. Honeywell advised that the question would need research, but felt that it's in the realm of possibility. She advised that an alternate method would be to offset the assessment fees by the amount received from general admissions. Council Member Cathcart suggested that the assessment district study be prepared independendy of the feasibility. report. In response to Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter, Ms. Honeywell advised that establishment of an assessment district requires certain actions that can't be handled on a ballot. However, to gain an idea of public support for such a project, a question could be placed on the ballot for public response. Mr. Cosper advised that the Landscape & Lighting District allows for generation of funds for capital expenditures within the district and suggested that a sub-zone could be created for that purpose. Ms. Honeywell advised that new public improvements require voter approval under the Landscape & Lighting District, but other types of assessment districts could possibly be utilized. If the Council should decide to place the issue on the ballot, she suggested that the issues be listed separately to lessen confusion. Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter commented that a number of residents outside of the Cove area have voiced their wish for a pool and she was concerned how assessments could be handled equitably. Council Member Cathcart was opposed to an assessment district for the Cove area because taxes would also be imposed on those in the Cove who don't want a pool. Council Member Sniff advised that the study would not be site-specific, but would allow the consultants to look at possible assessment financing. Council Member Cathcart understood that the purpose of the feasibility report was to better prepare the City to distribute a Request for Proposals to outside operators. He was disturbed that pool expert agencies, such as the YMCA and Boys & Girls Club, aren't being contacted to fmd out what kind of suggestions they have for a pool and their proposal for operating it. He questioned spending $10,000 to gain such information from outside operators when they have already expressed a desire to have input in the designing of the pool should the City choose to utilize their services for operation. Mr. Cosper advised that the intent of the report isn't to determine the design of the pool, but to look at the full concept which includes examining the use of outside operators, success of such operators, and types of pools that are more successful under outside operation. Successful city-operated pools will also be exainined. The intent is to come up with a pool concept that will work for the City based on the characteristics that the BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 12 April 4, 1995 City has to offer. He advised that the report will be funded through monies set aside for the Fritz Burns Park. Council Member Cathc art stated that he still strongly opposed the study, but might vote for it if funded directly from the Landmark money. M?ON It was moved by Council Members SnifflPerkins to authorize and direct the appropriate City staff to request proposals for a complete Community Pool Feasibility Report, including possible assessment financing, and authorize the City Manager to execute a Professional Services Agreement to complete the feasibility report, with the $19,540 to be paid from the Community Service Fund. Council Member Cathc art advised that he would vote for the motion. with strong reluctance, commenting that he was opposed to continuing the issue and felt that the money should be spent on an aquatics program at the high school pool this summer with the YMCA. Council Member Sniff felt that sufficient flinds were available to complete the study as well as fund a summer aquatics program at the high school. Council Member Perkins commented on the continuing reference to available funds, noting that they continue to be expended for various reasons. Motion carried with Mayor Pefla ABSENT. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-66. 2. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION ENDORSING TRE CONCEPT OF A COACHELLA VALLEY NAFTA RAIL CORRIDOR. Mayor Pefia advised that this item was previously continued on March 21st and is a proposal to adopt a resolution endorsing the concept of a Coachella Valley NAFTA Rail Corridor. Council Member Sniff didn't understand the value of the proposal and questioned its practicality. He asked staff who initiated the proposal. Mr. Cosper, Public Works Director, advised that CVAG is the agency promoting the proposal. He advised that ISTEA Funds and Federal funding for inter-model improvements will be made available if the rail corridor is established. Council Member Sniff asked if double tracks are available beyond Riverside, what construction costs would be, and how those costs will be funded. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 13 April 4, 1995 Mr. Cosper advised that he wasn't sure about the tracks beyond Riverside nor the costs of the proposal. He said that the purpose of the resolution is to support the concept of a rail corridor which will open various funding sources. After the resolution is adopted, it will be forwarded to the Riverside County Transportation Commission and appropriate Federal offices. Council Member Sniff felt that the proposal was relatively benign, but would support the concept. RESOLUTION NO.95-23 A RESOLUTION OF THE CifY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA ENDORSING THE CONCEIT OF A COACHELLA VALLEY NAFTA RAIL CORRIDOR. It was moved by Council Members Sm.ff?Cathcart to adopt Resolution No.95-23 as submitted. Mr. Jack Sobelman, 52-815 Avenida Martinez, suggested that a Metrolink stop be constructed at Washington Street to benefit the La Quinta Hotel. Mayor Pefa pointed out that the issue is only a concept at the present tirne. Motion carried unanimously. 3. CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST OF THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMITTEE FOR A CHANGE IN LOCATION FOR THE YOUTH ART PROJECT FROM THE EISENHOWER PARK TO THE BEAR CREEK BIKE PATh. Council Member Sniff advised that lengthy discussions were held a few years ago regarding a series of rest-stops along the Bear Creek Bike Path and he expressed a wish for those discussions to resurface. Mr. Herman. Community Development Director, advised that the location of the art will be coordinated with one of the six rest-stops. Mr. Cosper advised of the possible use of Urban Forestry funds to install landscaping and irrigation at the rest-stops, but stated that they couldn't be used for lighting installation. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 14 April 4, 1995 Council Member Sniff felt that a common theme should be developed between the rest- stops such as bike racks, benches, and water fountains. He encouraged comprehensive planning of the project. Mr. Herman advised that the final design will be brought back to the Council for approval. Mayor Pena? pointed out that the bike path is heavily used. M?ON It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to approve the request to relocate the Youth Art Project as recommended by the Art in Public Places Commit?ee and inclusive of the overall concept). Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-67. 4. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO RENEGOTIATE THE EXISTING AUDITING SERVICES OF CONRAD AM) ASSOCIATES. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to authorize renegotiation of the consultant services agreement with Conrad & Associates. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-68. 5. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED FEBRUARY 28,1995 FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Cathcart to receive and file the Treasurer's Report dated February 28, 1995 for the City of La Quinta. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-69. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Cathcart to receive and file the Treasurer's Report dated February 28, 1995 for the La Quinta Financing Authority. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.95-70. 6. CONSIDERATION OF A DON?ON FROM KSL RECREATION FOR ONE GUEST CONTESTANT TO PLAY IN THE LIBERTY MUTUAL LEGENDS OF GOLF TOURNAMENT. Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, recommended that Council direct staff to prepare a resolution, accepting the donation from KSL for one guest contestant to play in the Liberty Mutual Legends of Golf Tournament and authorize the City Manager to designate the recipient. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 15 April 4, 1995 RESOLUTION NO.95-24 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING GIFT OF ONE GUEST CONThSTANT IN THE LIBERTY MUTUAL LEGENDS OF GOLF TOURNAMENT BY KSL RECREATION CORPORATION. It was moved by Council Members SniffiBangerter to adopt Resolution No.95-24 as recommended. Motion carried unanimously. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED APRIL 4, 1995. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR OVERNIGHT TRAVEL FOR SENIOR ENGINEER TO ATTEND CALTRANS SPONSORED RESWENT ENGINEER ACADEMY IN VENTURA, CALIFORNIA, APRIL 18-21, 1995. 3. REJECTION OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY MARY ANN JOEST, DATE OF CLAIM, DECEMBER 3, 1993. 4. REJECTION OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY LANA JACKSON, DATh OF CLAIM, DECEMBER 3, 1993. 5. APPROVAL OF INSTALLATION OF A MULTI-STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF JEFFERSON STREET AND WESTWARD HO DRIVE. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to approve the Consent Calendar as recommended. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.95- 71. Council recessed to Redevelopment Agency meeting. Council reconvened and recessed to Closed Session to and until the hour of 7:00 p.m. CLOSED SESSION 1. Public Employee Appointment Finance Director pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 2. Conference with Real Property Negotiator Don Martin pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8 regarding potential acquisition of Village Community Park. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 16 April 4, 1995 Council reconvened with no decision being made which requires reporting pursuant to Section 54957.1 of the Government Code Brown Act). 7:00 P.M. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS Mayor Pena advised that SunLine Transit Agency has requested a letter of support from the City for House Appropriations for Federal lunds to complete their natural gas infrastructure project. He advised that he would sign the letter if there were no objections from Council. Council concurred. All other reports were noted and filed. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Mrs. Juhola. Administrative Services Director, advised that there are 73 recipients for this semester's New Leaf Awards and asked the Council where they would like to make the presentations. Council concurred on making the presentations in the Council Chamber. Mayor Pefia requested that Certificates of Appreciation be prepared for the Soap Box Derby participants as well. Mr. Hartung, Building & Safety Director, advised that the Citizens on Patrol Program was reactivated on March 10th with approximately 30 participants involved and it's working well. Mayor Pena suggested that Citizens on Patrol participants be presented Certificates of Appreciation also. In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Hartung advised that the Sheriff's Department will be issuing identification cards to the Citizens on Patrol volunteers. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 17 April 4, 1995 Mr. Jack Sobelman, 52-815 Avenida Martinez, asked the Council to include monthly reports from the Sheriff's Station Commander on 911 calls, non-violent calls, and traffic violations. Mayor Pefia suggested that he contact Captain Dye for that information. All written reports were noted and filed. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION OF TAKE OUR DAUGHThRS TO WORK" WEEK. Mayor Pena advised that some of the City staff members wish to participant in the Take Our Daughters to Work Week" and suggested that Council approve the program. Council concurred. 2. DISCUSSION OF BIG BROTHERS/BIG SISTERS OF AMERICA PROGRAM FOR LETThR OF ENDORSEMENT. Council Member Cathcart advised that a group of valley residents wish to establish a Big Brothers/Big Sisters of America Program and are requesting the cities to submit letters of support for the program. Council concurred on submitting a letter of support. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ms. Lameka Ingram, 78-625 Sanita Drive, felt that the community and its schools are going downhill because of the lack of activities for the youth. She believed that a public pool will benefit the community by providing swim recreation in La Quinta during the summer and increase water safety through swimming classes. She encouraged the Council to remember that the youth are the City's future. Mr. Hallie Hayes, 52-400 Avenida Vallejo, commented that he strongly supports the pool and believed that the community should be willing to pay additional taxes to help cover the maintenance costs if necessary. He pointed out that other agencies make a profit in operating their pools and believed that La Quinta could also. He urged the Council to build the pool for the youth in the community. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 18 April 4, 1995 Mr. Carl Ingram, 78-625 Sanita Drive, spoke in support of the pool and asked what the community must do to make the pool a reality. He felt that everyone should be looking for a way to comprise and streamline the costs instead of discussing whether or not to have a pool. He felt that the pool should be run by the Parks & Recreation Department and suggested that City residents be given first choice for job openings. He questioned why part of the Civic Center fuhds weren't used to build a pool and recreation center. He didn't feel that enough is spent on the youth of the community and asked if there are City committees which focus on their needs. Mayor Pefla advised that the City's Parks & Recreation Commission and Youth Advisory Committee deal with the needs of the youth in the community. He felt that I-a Quinta is well ahead of the curve on providing those services and advised that the City built the Sports Complex, enhanced the multi-purpose room, and built the amphitheater. Ms. Sandy Spiropoulis, 54-620 Eisenhower Drive, addressed a comment made at the last meeting about people wanting a pool for a babysitting service. She felt that lifestyles have changed and parents are wanting a healthy, productive environment for their children as well as a place to go as a family. She was opposed to locating the pool at the Boys & Girls Club because it wouldn't facilitate family use. She advised that her family is willing to help with fundraising events to make the pool a reality. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING ON PLOT PLAN 93-495 REVISED), APPEAL OF SIMON PLAZA, INC. OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION'S CONDITIONS TO THE APPROVAL OF A ONE-YEAR EXThNSJON OF TIME FOR A PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED PROJECT ON 5.6i ACRES ON HIGHWAY 111, EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET. Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that on May 24, 1994, the Planning Commission approved a one-year time extenSion for Plot Plan 93-495, subject to conditions and the applicant filed an appeal to some of those conditions. The appeal was continued by Council several times with the last continuance granted to April 4, 1995 to allow the applicant time to submit a revised site plan without Parcel 6, but the applicant has requested that it be continued further as the applicant still does not have control of that parcel. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. There being no one wishing to speak, the Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING CLOSED. Mayor Pefia asked if the applicant is still negotiating with Pomona First Federal Bank. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 19 April 4, 1995 Mr. Fred Simon, 78-611 Highway 111, President of Simon Plaza, Inc., confirmed that they are working to resolve financial issues with Pomona First Federal and to acquire Parcel 6. In response to Mayor Pena, Mr. Herman advised that an additional one-year time extension request would have to be filed 30 days in advance of the current expiration date of May 24, 1995. The new request would be reviewed by the Planning Commission and if the conditions of approval remain the same, the applicant could file another appeal at that time. Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that an additional one?year time ex?nsion submittal will require a revised site plan if the applicant hasn't gained control of Parcel 6 by that time. The current appeal will become moot at that time and the Planning Commission will begin from scratch with a new submittal. She advised that a continuance until May 2nd will leave the conditions in limbo and keep the appeal from lapsing, allowing the applicant time to submit a request for another extension. Mr. Simon voiced concern regarding the need to resubmit his application because each new submittal brings changes and costs him more money. He advised that he needed time to complete negotiations with Pomona First Federal regarding acquisition of their parcel and will be able to transfer the right-of-ways that the City needs for the Washington Street corridor upon completion of that escrow. He felt that the City would benefit by extending him time to continue his negotiations and asked the Council if the matter could be continued beyond May 2nd. Ms. Honeywell advised that any action on the appeal will be void on May 24th because the plot plan expires at that time. She said that the applicant had benefit of the extension for one year, but without action on the appeal. She advised that the conditions may be reconsidered upon a new submittal. In response to Council Member Cathcart, Ms. Honeywell confirmed that the Council can't approve the current appeal because the applicant doesn't have control of Parcel 6. Council Member Cathcart understood Mr. Simon's concerns about submitting a new application that may have new conditions, but advised that the Council can't assure him of that outcome. Mr. Herman advised that Condition No.2 of the one-year extension approval requires that the applicant submit a new one-year extension request by April 24, 1995. He advised that the condition relating to property dedication for the right-of-way states that the property must be dedicated prior to the issuance of a building permit BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 20 April 4, 1995 Ms. Honeywell advised that the applicant will have to submit for another one?year time extension on the plot plan unless he gains control of Parcel 6 and pulls building permits on the project before the May 24th deadline. Mr. Herman read Condition No.2 of the time-extension approval which requires that substantial construction be started by May 24th or the plot plan becomes null and void. It also states that an additional one-year time extension may be requested provided it is flied by April 24, 1995. Mayor Pef? suggested that the matter be continued to May 2nd to allow the applicant additional time to complete his negotiations with Pomona First Federal. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to continue the appeal by Simon Plaza. Inc. until May 2, 1995. Motion carried unanimously. MIN'yE ORDER NO.95-72. STUDY SESSION DISCUSSION OF PROCESS FOR ANALYSIS OF THE PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT. Mr. Genovese, City Manager, advised that on March 7th, the Council requested that this matter be agendized. He said that the staff report contains a background of the Parks & Recreation Department, the current department configuration, information regarding two different methods of approaching the analysis, and information regarding the current operations. He asked for Council's direction regarding which method of analysis they preferred, noting that the two methods would be handled in the budget differently. Mayor Pera asked what the current status of the Parks & Recreation Department Director position was. Mr. Genovese advised that March 31st was the filing deadline for that vacant position. Mayor Pefia advised that the purpose of reviewing the department at this time was to consider the current vacancy along with other issues facing the City's recreation programs. He believed that all departments should be reviewed to find out what the service levels and needs are. He wished to make it clear that he wasn't singling Out any one department and noted that police services are also being reviewed. Council Member Cathcart asked what options were available regarding the department. Mayor Pefia suggested that the department be kept at status quo through this fiscal year, using current staff to carry Out the recreation programs and possibly coordinating some BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 21 April 4, 1995 of the programs with the C.V. Parks & Recreation District. He wished to see an analysis of the department's recreation programs to find out how successful they've been. Mr. Genovese advised that a staff report was provided after the department's first brochure and anticipated that such a report would follow subsequent brochures to report the success of the programs. He advised that every department is reviewed each year in terms of their goals and needed resources to complete those goals. Mayor Pena asked if contract services or temporary help have been investigated to help coordinate any of the recreation programs. Mr. Genovese advised that staffs current approach has been to proceed with the building of the department as directed. He advised that the department coordinates its programs with the Recreation District and YMCA to avoid duplication of programs. Council Member Perkins felt that the City should be a coordinator of all recreational programs in the City. He didn't feel that the department should be expanded to any great extent without a thorough study because of the personnel costs. He viewed the department as being responsible for coordinating all recreational activities in the City using available resources, but not necessarily organizing all the activities, except those that are essential to the City and not done by other organizations. Council Member Cathcart agreed, believing that stand-alone cities are not as prudent as in the past, citing the fact that most cities no longer have their own Fire and Police Departments. He felt that the Recreation Department should be handled similarly by coordinating some of its recreation services with other organizations and suggested that that concept be kept in mind while interviewing for a new director. He felt that a new director should be willing to utilize the services of other organizations as opposed to having visions of expanding the department. He didn't wish to see a reduction in the department, but was opposed to the department's growth exceeding the budgeted funds. Mr. Genovese advised that the current philosophy of administration is that there would be a director, recreation supervisor, and a secretary with a General Fund contribution of $200,OO() annually. Staff's intention is that any additional staff will be directly tied to specific programs and supported by program fees. Mayor Pena was concerned that the Recreation Department would grow in size and it's the first area most cities cut back on during budget cuts. He said that residents become accustomed to recreation activities that sometimes aren't self-supporting and it then becomes a political issue on how the City can provide funding for a department that doesn't pay for its programs. He suggested that the City approach the Recreation District regarding needed programs and ask them how the City can help obtain them. He wasn't opposed to the Recreation Department. but it also needs to include leisure services and the Senior Center operations. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 22 April 4, 1995 Council Member Bangerter preferred to continue the department in its present direction. She advised that a director is the only position that the City is recruiting for and wasn't sure that adding the Senior Center would change the department costs. She wasn't opposed to working with other organizations to a certain extent, but felt that the community's money should be put back into the community. She believed that some services can be shared with other organizations such as the Recreation District, but was concerned that too much of their program revenues go toward administration. She felt that operation of programs in-house allows more revenue to go back into needed programs in the community instead of administration costs. She felt that review of all depar?ments should be handled through the budget process. Mayor Pera questioned what percentage of the City's Recreation Department's cost currently goes toward administration. Council Member Bangerter advised that there is a difference because the City's administration costs are tied directly to programs specific for La Quinta and not valley- wide like the Recreation District. Mayor Pefia advised that the Council previously discussed de-annexing from the Recreation District and he felt that now would be a prudent time to re-analyze that consideration due to the present economy. Council Member Cathcart wasn't in favor of rushing into a de-annexation from the District. He advised that his notion regarding the pool and the Recreation Department are the same; that programs are created when participants demonstrate an interest and need for them. He felt that an aquatics program at the high school pool this summer would provide an indication of the demand for aquatic programs. In the same manner, he felt that the City should not rush in becoming a stand-alone" recreation provider for the City and de-annexing from the District. He believed that the department should be allowed to continue building the program for a few years to determine if it's going to be worth de-annexing from the District. He felt that it was beneficial to continue in the present direction as long as the amount spent is limited to the budgeted amount and possibly placing the Senior Center under the Parks & Recreation Department. Mayor Peila advised that his purpose in raising?the issue was so the Council could come to a point of determining which direction it wishes to go. Council Member Sniff stated that it's never been the intention of the Council to alienate other recreation organizations from the City and advised that the City coordinates recreation programs with the Recreation District and YMCA. He advised that the City's Recreation Department is extremely prudent and the smallest department of the City, yet has done a superb job with their brochure and programming. He felt that having a City- operated Recreation Department brings it in close and personal to the City's residents. He stated that a large part of the department's $200,000 budget is used for administration BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 23 April 4, 1995 because programs don't run alone. He felt that the City's department has provided far better recreation service than any other organization has ever provided to the City He believed that the Parks & Recreation Commission needs a department to work with and through. The StreSs experienced by those who are now overseeing the Recreation Department should be relieved because it makes them less effective in their positions He felt that having a Recreation Department is thinking ahead" and puts the City in a position to be able to dc-annex from the District, should that decision ever be made. He felt that having a well-run, small department provide the City's recreation services is the prudent action for the City to take. He, too, agreed that the Senior Center should be operated under the Parks & Recreation Department. He questioned the actual savings in abandoning tlle department and paying an outside organization to carry out the programs, noting that personal touch and control would be lost. He also questioned who would then oversee the Parks & Recreation Commission and Senior Center. He supported the department and believed that they arc being cost-effective with their programs. He believed that departments should be reviewed, but questioned the present department-specific review. Mayor Pena reiterated that he brought up the issue because of the current vacancy in the department and felt that it was an oppomine time to review it along with the police services that are also being reviewed. He felt that every department should be reviewed periodically to ensure their efficiency and advised that he wasn't advocating the abandonment of the Recreation Department. He also wanted to find out the Council's wish regarding future de-annexation from the District as discussed in the past. He noted that circumstances have changed as well as the economy and believed that the Council should review how the recreation services are being provided. He agreed that the department is doing a fine job and running their programs in a cost-effective manner. He advised that they provide statistics of their programs and approval of programs is based on the levels of participation. He felt that the review allows the Council an opportunity to decide if they wish to move toward the lull-blown" department that de- annexation requires or remain small and within the City's means, cooperating with outside organizations for recreation services. Council Member Sniff felt that the Council's intent was to aim toward cooperative- independence and direct staff to interact with other providers and provide the most possible service at the best possible price. He felt that they have accomplished that to a significant degree. He didn't feel that dc-annexation was the only purpose in establishing a Recreation Department, but rather a potential product of it. Council Member Perkins believed that the Recreation Department should be reviewed like all other departments. He wished to see them work with the Little League and the Recreation District to bring needed programs into the City. He wasn't particularly looking at de-annexation from the District, but rather was concerned that the best recreational services be provided to La Quinta at the best price. He was disturbed with implications that the Council wants to abandon the department. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 24 April 4, 1995 Mayor Pef?a asked the City Manager to advise the Parks & Recreation Department staff that the Council at no time considered the abandonment of that department, but rather are reviewing ways to be more efficient in programs and to cooperate with other recreation agencies. He advised that the Recreation District is wiUing to provide recreational services to the City. Council Member Cathcart felt that the City shouldn't compete with other organizations for recreation services, noting how competition amongst some recreation organizations has basically disintegrated the valley's youth baseball program. He wants the new Recreation Director to be made aware that the department's responsibility is to coordinate the programs that are available. Council Member Perkins asked the City Manager to confirm the Council's support to the Parks & Recreation Commission as well. Council concurred. In response to Council Member Cathcart, Mr. Genovese advised that a new Parks & Recreation Director should be on staff within two months. Council Member Cathcart advised that the YMCA is willing to operate an aquatics program at the high school pool this summer and he felt that it would be a big mistake to not coordinate such an effort with them. Mayor Pefia advised that he spoke with the Jon Gafney, principal of the high school, and they, too, are willing to operate an aquatics program this summer under the direction of their own personnel. He suggested that staff work to coordinate that effort. Council Member Cathcart.advised that the YMCA operates such programs at the College of the Desert and Indio High School and he wished staff to contact them as well. Council Member Bangerter felt that the issue of a summer swim program should be brought back as a separate Study Session item. Mayor Pefia suggested that the City Manager gather the needed information and submit it back to Council as a Department Report. Council Member Cathcart was concerned about the shortage of time to plan a sunimer swim program and wanted staff directed to begin negotiations. Council Member Perkins referred to a memo in Attachment 1 of the staff report where Clint Bohlen listed the various organizations that he felt should be utilized to coordinate recreation programs for the City and he felt that it was a very good report. BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02 City Council Minutes 25 April 4, 1995 Mr. Genovese advised that staff will report back to Council on potential summer swim prograans and move forward with the recruitment process for a Recreation Director. There being no furdier business, it was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to adjourn. Motion carried unanimously. SAUNDRA L. IUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California BIB] 12-12-95-U01 03:28:47PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 04-U02 04-U02 95-U02