1994 01 18 CC Minutes) LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
JANUARY 18, 1994
Regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 3:00 P.M. by Mayor Pro
Tern Bangerter followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.
PRESENT: Council Members Bangerter, McCartney, Perkins, Sniff
ABSENT: Mayor Pena
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney that Mayor Pena be excused.
Motion carried unanimously.
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
Mr. Hunt, City Manager, stated that Mayor Pena asked that Business Session Nos. 4 and 9 and
Public Hearing No. 3 be continued and noted that correspondence was received at the dais from
Del Webb and Gibson, Dunn, and Crutcher.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney to accept the material that was
placed before them on the dais as it came to them after the agenda was prepared.
Council Member Sniff asked that Consent Item No.2 be pulled and made Business Session No.
17.
Council Member McCartney asked that Mayor and Council Members' Item No.2 be moved in
front of the Business Session agenda because of the timing consideration.
Council Member Sniff amended his motion.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to accept the material that was
placed before them on the dais, Consent Item No.2 be pulled and made Business Session No.
17, and Mayor and Council Members' Item No.2 be moved in front of the Business Session
agenda, noting that the need to take action arose after the agenda was prepared. Motion carried
unanimously with Mayor Pena absent.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney that the Minutes of November
30, 1993; December 21, 1993; and January 4, 1994 be approved as submitted. Motion carried
unanimously with Mayor Pena absent.
ANNOUNCEMENTS None
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 2 January 18, 199?
PRESENTATIONS None
PUBLIC COMMENT
Martin Langer, 4994 El Circulo, President of the Coachella Valley Community Concert
Association, advised that they moved from Indio into La Quinta approximately three years ago
and currently have an outreach program in the schools. He advised that the concert season has
begun with two concerts completely sold out, which acknowledges the support received from the
citizens in La Quinta. Their desire is to be another gem in the cultural crown of La Quinta.
He thanked the Council for their encouragement and support.
WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE
a. Letter from City of Palm Desert encouraging the Council to adopt a resolution
supporting the Riverside County Transportation Commission's challenge to Calexico
East-Border Crossing and new State Route 7 project.
Council Member Perkins felt that we should seldom support issues that do not directly
affect the City, however, the City will be affected if the movement by the Riverside
Transportation Commission is not accepted. Therefore, he supported the adoption of the
proposed resolution.
MOTION It was moved by Council Member Perkins to adopt the resolution supporting
the Riverside County Transportation Commission's challenge to Calexico East?Horder
Crossing and the new State Route 7 project.
Council Member Sniff also felt that the City will be impacted indirectly and anything
affecting the Coachella Valley, its transportation, and the accessibility on the highways
is important. He also supported this request.
Council Member Perkins amended his motion.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Perkins/Sniff to place this matter on the
next City Council agenda. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent.
ORDER NO. 9?1.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 3 January 18, 199?
b. Letter from City of Indian Wells transmitting a resolution calling for the inunediate
search for a new CVAG Executive Director.
Council Member Perkins could not support this request because personnel issues are
matters of Closed Session by the Executive Committee, and the City Council has no
business in pursuing it.
Council Member McCartney agreed that this is CVAG's business and should be kept at
the Executive Committee level.
Council Member Sniff concurred that this is CVAG's business, but CVAG's business is
the City's business because we are a part of CVAG. He felt it is inappropriate, but
would like to discuss this further when Mayor Pena, representative to CVAG, is present.
He suggested placing this back on the agenda for the next City Council meeting of
February 1, 1994 for further discussion and direction to Mayor Pena.
Council Member Perkins had no problem with directing our representative on the
Executive Committee, but expressed concern about the way in which it was handled by
making it a public issue before making a decision.
In response to Council Member Sniff, Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that it
would not be appropriate to place this under Closed Session because the City is not the
body making the decision on this matter.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members SnifflMcCartney that this item be placed
on the next Council agenda for February 1, 1994.
Council Member Perkins wished for it to be clear that the Council is only going to
discuss the matter and not join Indian Wells on calling for an immediate search.
Council concurred.
Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO. 9?2
At this time Mayor and Council Members' Item No.2 was taken out of order.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 4 January 18, 1994
MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS
2. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO BE FORWARDED
TO DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT STATING THE CITY
COUNCIL'S POSITION THAT STUDENTS RESIDING WITHIN THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA SHALL HAVE FIRST PRIORITY FOR ATTENDANCE AT THE LA
QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL.
Council Member McCartney stated that the citizens of La Quinta have expressed strong
feelings at various meetings about being able to attend La Quinta High School.
Currently, the boundaries show residents living on the east side of Jefferson would not
attend the high school and those living on the other side of Jefferson would attend. He
felt adopting the proposed resolution would make a formal statement, as well as be made
a part of the public record when the School District considers the boundaries
Council Member Sniff commented that the school officials have indicated that there is
a free interchange with any high school within the Desert Sands Unified School District.
They will maintain vacancies in all three high schools for those students desiring to
attend a school of their choice. Even though the School Board stated that any high
school student from La Quinta can attend La Quinta High School, he had no problem
with adopting the proposed resolution.
Council Member Perkins concurred.
Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter agreed that adopting the proposed resolution would show
support for the citizens and children in our community, as well as concern for their
welfare and desires.
RESOLUTION NO. 9?1
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA
DETERMINING THAT HIGH SCHOOL-AGE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA SHOULD HAVE THE OPTION TO ATTEND THE NEW LA QUINTA
HIGH SCHOOL FACILITY.
It was moved by Council Members McCartney?Sniff that Resolution No.94-i be adopted
as submitted. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 5 January 18, 1998
BUSINESS SESSION
CONSIDERATION OF STREET-NAME CHANGE 93-004 FROM VIA SOUl) TO
VIA AVANTE, LOCATED SOUTH OF 47TH AVENUE AND EAST OF CALEO
BAY WITHIN LAKE LA QUINTA. APPLICANTS: LAKE LA QUINTA, WILMA
LA QUINTA & LANDREX.
Mr. Herman, Planning Director, advised that the developer of Lake La Quinta requested
a street-name change from Via Soud to Via Avante because of the difficulty in
pronouncing the Street name. He advised that the Planning Commission did not receive
any opposition and recommended approval of this request.
In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Herman advised that there are no residents
currently living on that street.
RESOLUTION NO.94-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION TO CHANGE THE STREET
NAME VIA SOUD TO VIA AVANTE. CASE NO. STREET-NAME CHANGE 93-
004. LAKE LA QUINTA, WILMA LA QUINTA, AND LANDREX CALIFORNIA.
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Mccartney that Resolution No.94-2 be adopted
as submitted. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent.
2. CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICE FOR THE 1994 LA
QUINTA ARTS FESTIVAL SAD 93-034). APPLICANT: LA QUINTA ARTS
FOUNDATION.
Mr. Herman, Planning Director, advised that the Arts Foundation requested locating
special advertising devices throughout the City for their 12th annual festival to be
conducted in the Village Park on March 17-20, 1994.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Mccartney/Sniff to approve the La
Quinta Arts Foundation's request for Special Advertising Device 93-034 subject to
conditions. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER
NO. 9?3.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 6 January 18, 199i
3. CONSIDERATION OF ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMITTEE REQUEST TO
SPEND APP FUNDS TO HELP INCORPORATE ART WITHIN THE FRITZ
BURNS PARK.
Mr. Herman, Planning Director, advised that the Art in Public Places Committee has
requested the opportunity to meet with the architect currently designing the Fritz Burns
Park to discuss the potential locations for public art as part of the Fritz Burns Park. The
Art in Public Places funds are designated to be used throughout the City to enhance the
cultural aspects of the City. He advised that the Committee would report back to the
Council prior to any expenditure of funds.
In response to Council Member McCartney, Mr. Herman advised that part of the process
in placing the art is exploring the cost with the architect. The Committee is considering
placing art on the exterior walls of the tennis and swim facility and incorporating it
within the playground.
Council Member Sniff felt that this was not the appropriate way to go at this time.
Architects cost money and the money in the fund could go for other meaningful
purposes.
Council Member McCartney stated that he is currently working on a concept to develop
a La Quinta Cultural Arts Center which would include performing arts, visual arts, and
displaying works of historical art. He felt the Arts in Public Places funds would be a
potential source for the preliminary design of the project. With the opening of the park
one year away, he could not consider this request at this time. He felt discussions with
an architect would incur additional expense and asked that this matter be placed on hold
for approximately three months.
Council Member Sniff expressed concern about this request delaying the progress of the
Fritz Burns Park, as well as incurring additional cost. The park has been in existence
since approximately 1987, and he could not support any request that would cause further
delay.
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter, Mr. Hunt, City Manager, advised that no cost
would be involved in consulting with the architect because there are a series of meetings
built into the architect's contract. If Council authorizes this request, the meetings would
dovetail with any existing meeting.
John Walling, Chairman of the Art in Public Places Committee, stated that they were
advised that the consultation fee was included in the original contract, noting that this
would be an exploratory meeting. Because of budget constraints, they were told the
bathhouse had to be cut down and would be very plain. The Committee at that time
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 7 January 18, 199?
thought about incorporating art during the design of the building to enhance it. using the
Art in Public Places funds rather than funds budgeted for the park. They wish to meet
with the architect to suggest such ideas and lay the ground work in the architect's mind
to design a building that in the future could take art work. He advised that the
Committee has tentatively identified possibilities of other areas to integrate art in the
park. In order to do it successfully, they need to establish a definite art master plan in
the planning processes with those involved. The art work could then be added at a later
date if it is integrated in the design of the project.
In response to Council Member McCartney, Mr. Walling was not sure if Art in Public
Places funds would be used for the Fritz Burns Park. He advised that the door was open
to use the funds, however, it would be Council's decision. They wish to set up the
design concept so art at some point would be included in the project, not as an add-on
in the future, but as initially planned.
Council Member McCartney wished to design in as much art work as possible as long
as the associated costs are minimal. His concern was that often times when consulting
with architects, the original design scheme is changed requiring additional time and
money.
Mr. Walling stated that they would impress upon the architect this would not be a change
order and there will be no additional costs but integrate into his thinking about how to
evolve the project. He assured that they would not be using the Art in Public Places
funds and that the time frame would not be delayed.
Mr. Bohien, Parks & Recreation Manager, advised that the consultant is currently in the
Design Documentation phase. They are taking information from community members,
specifically experts in the field of aquatics and incorporating it into a revised design for
the site project which should be completed within approximately 60 days. They will
begin putting together blue prints around March or April. He further advised that the
pool consultant is working on filtration, design, and chlorination systems. He stated that
there would not be any delay using the Art in Public Places Committee in an advisory
capacity or any additional expense.
Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter felt that it was appropriate to involve the Arts in Public Places
Committee, but asked if the process would be slowed down if the Committee had to
report back to Council with their ideas and suggestions.
Mr. Walling advised that there would not be any dramatic changes made to the plans that
would cause any delays.
Mr. Boblen stated that this is the appropriate time for the Committee to participate and
that their suggestions could possibly be incorporated at no cost to the City.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 8 January 18, 1994
In response to Council Member Sniff? Mr. Bohien advised that the projected completion
date of the Fritz Burns Park is December 15, 1994.
Council Member Perkins felt that the Committee's request was appropriate, but expressed
concern about the use of the funds. He stated that if he could be assured there would be
no cost to the City and any changes or recommendations made by the Committee would
be brought back to the Council for approval, he would support this request. He felt that
this is a proper thing for the Committee to be doing.
Mr. Walling stated that there is currently no building design, therefore, the Council will
review the initial design with the Committee's thoughts incorporated in the plans.
Council Member Sniff suggested making the art multi-functional so it could be useful
rather than just decorative.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney to grant the Art in
Public Places Committee permission to meet with the architect for the Fritz Burns Park
to explore the possibility of including art as part of the design providing there are no
delays, no extra design cost, and no expenditure of Art in Public Places funds. Motion
carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-4.
4. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 2.29, PLANNING
COMMISSION, LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE AND DELETING ALL CODE
SECTIONS REFERRING TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD.
Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter noted that there has been a request to continue this item.
Council concurred in taking up this item at this time.
Mr. Herman, Planning Director, advised that the proposed amendment to Chapter 2.29
of the La Quinta Municipal Code would increase the size of the Planning Commission
from five to seven members and delete all reference to the Design Review Hoard. The
proposed draft ordinance provides for professionals to serve on the Commission but was
not a requirement. If the ordinance is introduced, then cancellation of the Design
Review Board meeting for February was recommended, as well as authorizing staff to
begin the recruitment process and transfer of funds from the DRB to the Planning
Commission to supplement the salary of the two new members.
Marion Elison, 8O?82 Palm Circle Drive, expressed concern about the demise of the
Design Review Board, because she felt they served a very useful purpose, as well as
putting a great deal of effort in developing standards for the City. She understood the
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Coundl Minutes 9 January 18, 1994
Council's reasomng. She hoped that the Planning Commission could have an opporturnty
for an informal interchange with the applicants prior to the formal hearings.
She felt that it was appropriate to be looking at Art in Public Places as something being
integrated into a building at the time it is developed rather than adding on.
Council Member Perkins emphasized that the Design Review Board's efforts would not
go by the wayside and would not be wasted, noting that they have done an excellent job.
He felt this is a matter of streamlining City government and is something we should look
at in all areas in order to operate smoother and faster and with less effort. He agreed
that the Commission should consider an informal session with the applicants.
Council Member Sniff stated that the Planning Commission could have more than one
study session, and if necessary, an item could be continued if more time is needed. He
felt that in the future it would be desirable, but not mandatory, that all Commissioners
have as much technical experience and background as possible. He believed that this
change would not cause any delays but rather speed up the process. He felt this to be
a positive move and supported implementing these changes and wished to see it go
forward.
Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter commented that she had previously voted with the Council
to disband the Design Review Board, but after further research, she could not support
it because the DRB serves a tremendous purpose to the City when it comes to
architectural review and design. She stated that if they don't receive adequate support,
they will not be able to fulfill their purpose.
Council Member Sniff felt that the Design Review Board received adequate support since
its inception and that this is not an indictment against them. They have done a good job
but there is no reason having two groups that can essentially accomplish the same
purpose. Enlarging the Planning Commission will allow a greater range of comments,
expertise, and background.
Council Member McCartney commented that all of the City Boards are made up of
people who are very special and often times do not receive the credit due them. He
stated that even though he will be voting for disbanding the Design Review Board, the
Members have done an exemplary job. If the Council approves expanding the Planning
Commission, he wished to incorporate the talent and capabilities and fulfill the two
positions with strong people. He felt those qualities are what separates this City from
the other cities in the Valley.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to take up Ordinance No.
241 by title and number only and waive further reading. Motion carried with Mayor Pro
Tern Bangerter voting NO and Mayor Pena absent.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 10 January 18, 1994
ORDINANCE NO.241
AN ORDINANCE OF THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.29.010 OF CHAPTER 2.29 OF TITLE
2 AND CHAPTER 9.183, SECTIONS 9.12.010, 9.12.020 AND 9.12.030 OF
CHAPTER 9.12, SECTION 9.90.050 OF CHAPTER 9.90, SECTION 9.180.030 OF
CHAPTER 9.180 OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO
DELETE THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND INCREASE THE NUMBER OF
MEMBERS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION.
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins that Ordinance No.241 be introduced
on first reading. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members McCartney, Perkins, Sniff
NOES: Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Mayor Pena
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to authorize staff to initiate
recruitment for the two new Planning Commission positions upon second reading and
approval of the Ordinance and that the appointments to be effective July 1, 1994.
Motion carried with Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter voting NO and Mayor Pena absent.
MINUTE ORDER NO.94-5.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members SnifflMcCartney to authorize the transfer
of funds from the Design Review Board to the Planning Commission. Motion carried
with Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter voting NO and Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER
NO.94-6.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney that the next meeting
of the Design Review Board be canceled. Motion carried with Mayor Pro Tem
Bangerter voting NO and Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO. 94-7.
5. CONSIDERATION OF SHORT-LISTING POTENTIAL SITES FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF A MATERIAL-RECOVERY FACILITY TO SERVE THE
EAST COUNTY.
Mr. Herman, Planning Director, advised that the Material Recovery Facility MRF)
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 11 January 18, 199?
Task Force had their first meeting on January 10, 1994. They will be deliberating on
the site selection for the MRF to serve the east County. He noted that Mayor Pena was
appointed as the Task Force representative, Council Member Sniff as the alternate, and
Fred Baker, Principal Planner, as staff support. The County and CVAG recommended
for consideration eight sites and four alternate sites for the Material Recovery Facility.
The responsibility of the Task Force is to pare down the list to either 2 or 3 sites for
further deliberations.
Council Member McCartney comrnented that he was previously unable to vote or speak
on these issues because of an employment contract he had with a potential MRF
provider. With the contract now put aside, he is able to review and comment on these
issues. He felt that there are many inaccuracies in the report. He referred to Page 8,
Site 6 the Southwest Corner of 45th Avenue and Auto Center Drive. He asked if
Southern Pacific has been contacted relative to this issue because they have always
indicated an excitement about developing land in and around their railroad and utilizing
the railroad as part of the MRF facility.
Mr. Baker advised that it is not in the consultant's, or sub-consultant's contract with
CVAG to provide backup information for City staff or City Councils. He advised that
the report was completed by a local realtor and Site 6 was reviewed by the County and
CVAG committees. It is a potential site but was ranked lower than other sites. A total
of seven sites were selected, as well as the Coachella Landfill four sites were added
since then for a potential of 12 sites for Council to choose from. He advised that the
County and CVAG committees looked at over 20 sites before narrowing them down.
Factors that had been considered were more general and not site specific. The MRF
Task Force wished to narrow the potential sites down to two or three sites so they can
complete a site specific analysis in terms of the accessibility and potential construction
costs.
In response to Council Member Mccartney, Mr. Baker advised that the study was
generated from the County and reviewed and approved by CVAG and CVAG committees
on the seven sites, at which time CVAG decided to form an MRF Task Force to make
decisions on site specificity. He further advised that the County prioritized their sites;
they did not narrow them down to two sites.
In further response to Council Member Mccartney, Mr. Baker advised that Sites L, K,
S, T, A, and I are all on the Southern Pacific Railroad. They have not analyzed the four
additional sites, but two of the sites he was familiar with are not directly on the Southern
Pacific access. He stated that it appears that alternate Sites 2, 3, and 4 have some type
of access from the general vicinity map, however, Site I does not.
Mr. Baker stated that Out of the listed prices currently available, Site 6 would be the
second least expensive.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 12 January 18, 199?
Council Member McCartney asked how large the building would need to be in order to
handle 2,000 tons daily.
Mr. Baker advised that the consultant would be able to give the parameters. He stated
that the acreage here would accommodate the 2,000 tons daily in the facility, as well as
accommodate composting, if needed, and all future possibilities.
Council Member McCartney stated that he wished to study each site in greater detail
before making a decision.
Mr. Baker advised that the Task Force Committee is meeting next week to narrow this
list and make their decision. They are requesting each representative to report back with
their recommendations of two or three sites.
In response to Council Member McCartney, Mr. Baker advised that the rail access for
the recyclable commodities, was one of the considerations of the County and CVAG
committees when they limited the available sites.
Council Member McCartney felt that the Sites selected should have rail access. From
a competitive rate standpoint, it would keep the truck rate down, as well as the flat car
rate down, because one mode of transportation could be played against the other mode
of transportation for the benefit of the City. Therefore, he was supportive of sites that
had rail access.
In response to Council Member McCartney, Mr. Baker advised the the trash vehicles
going to and from the MRF's would be the same vehicles currently used by waste
haulers. He further advised that the MRF site at capacity would not immediately have
a large amount of truck traffic. It will increase over time as recycling and markets
increase.
Mr. Baker confirmed that there are one or two sitC5 in the enterprise zone and that it was
weighed from a tax standpoint. He submitted a matrix which summarizes the seven sites
and the various factors the County and CVAG reviewed.
Council Member McCartney asked that this matter be continued until the next Council
meeting at which tirne he can study this in more detail.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter, Mr. Baker advised that the Task Force would
make their decision at their next meeting without the City, S input.
Council Member Sniff stated that the recommendations would not be a final decision.
He believed that they should go forward and recommend the sites they felt were the most
appropriate. He concurred with the importance of having maximized access to rail and
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 13 18, 199?
likes the sites south of Coachella.
Mr. Baker stated that they need to take into consideration rail access and its location in
the community and what the General Plan in that community allows. He advised that the
MRF site will have a potential host fee which could be based on the distance from where
the trash is picked up to the MRF site. Therefore, it would be beneficial to the City to
have a site as close as possible to La Quinta. He felt the sites in Coachella and Indio
would be preferable for the City.
Council Member Sniff recommended Sites L, K, and I for the MRF site. He further
commented that with the possibility of composting and traffic, the location of the site
should be the least intrusive to residential areas.
Council Member Perkins felt they need to consider rail access. the size of the facility to
handle future growth, and have the potential for composting. Also, locating the facility
close to La Quinta to deter additional expense would be preferable.
In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Baker advised that the County will be
closing the Coachella Landfill for environmental and cost reasons. The waste will then
be transported to Edom Hill Landfill. In the long term, there will be a need for another
landfill, possibly Eagle Mountain, or there are a couple of other waste by rail projects
underway. One would take it to Imperial County and one would take it to San
Bernardino County.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Mccartney/Sniff to direct our appointee
to suggest Sites I, K, and L as the City's recommended short list. Motion carried
unanimously with Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-8.
6. CONSIDERATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES ON PARK AVENUE
SOUTH OF AVENUE 50 AND ON CALLE TAMPICO EAST OF WASHINGTON
STREET.
Mr. Cosper, City Engineer, advised that traffic concerns have been raised by residents
in the Painted Cove and Bajada subdivisions. He advised that the two issues of concern
are the type of traffic that traverses Park Avenue and Calle Tampico and safety at the
intersection of Park Avenue and the two subdivisions.
The City requested the School District to revise their bus route and re-route their buses
off of Park Avenue, which they agreed to implement after the holidays. He advised that
if Council approves the truck route ordinance, that type of traffic will also be removed
from Park Avenue.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 14 January 18, 1994
Mr. Cosper advised that staff has completed additional traffic counts and measured the
site distance of the intersection on Park Avenue with the two subdivisions. Staff has
determined that this is potentially an unsafe situation because there is insufficient time
for a motorist leaving the subdivision to enter onto Park Avenue based on the posted
speed limits. Staff recommended implementing a four-way stop.
Dr. Robert Bass, 50-205 Mt. Shadows Road in the Painted Cove subdivision, stated that
he has had a number of near misses knowing that there is a limited sight distance at the
intersection. He warned that there is going to be a terrible accident at this intersection,
and even though the posted speed limit is 35 mph., many are driving approximately 60
mph. He further advised that when Calle Tampico was completed into four lanes, all the
other side streets were closed making Park Avenue the main thoroughfare for people
going through the Valley toward the schools or Indio. He stated they are surrounded by
arterial streets and have a problem with traffic being diverted from those streets through
their neighborhood.
Al Durette, 78-965 Dry Creek, home builder in both Bajada and Painted Cove
representing his customers, stated that a stop sign is needed at that location not only for
their personal safety but for the children's safety. The traffic needs to be slowed down
and installing stop signs may keep motorists from using it as a shortcut because they will
have to stop.
Gene Tinch, 79-010 Dry Creek, advised that the traffic problem is extensive and the
area is extremely dangerous due to speeding traffic.
Peter Ministrelli, Developer and resident, 79-125 Jack Rabbit Trail in the Painted Cove
subdivision, advised that they were denied access onto 50th Avenue forcing them to take
access off of Park Avenue. He stated that there was a fatal accident on Park Avenue
approximately two years ago and does not want to wait until there is another fatal
accident for a decision to be made. The limited sight distance is approximately 150 ft.
and is a very dangerous intersection. He strongly recommended that the Council support
this request and approve erecting a stop sign. He advised that a resident counted 600
vehicles one morning in 1 1/2 hours.
Dan Hamon, Painted Cove subdivision, advised that his wife is almost afraid to leave
the complex because of the traffic and he wants to make sure his family is kept safe.
Phillip Sharnis, 78-955 Del Monte Court in Desert Fairways, expressed concern about
traffic control. He stated that it is incumbent upon the Council to resolve this problem.
Eleanor King, 50-245 Mt. Shadows in Painted Cove, stated that the school traffic is very
heavy in the morning and afternoon. She expressed concern about the additional traffic
when the Boys and Girls Club opens. She believed that it had been proposed at one time
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 15 January 18, 1995
to install stop signs at Rondo, Big Horn, and at Park to deter people from using this
cutoff.
Council Member Sniff stated that he travels that route with frequency and there seems
to be little traffic outside of school hours. He agreed that something needs to be done
to make that intersection safe, but did not want to see that street restricted in such a way
as to restrict residents to the south and west from using it to get to the schools, Boys and
Girls Club and the YMCA. He understood the concerns of the residents and was hopeful
that a solution could be found. He pointed out that stop signs are not a panacea and at
times they give a strong false sense of security.
In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Cosper, City Engineer, advised that in
terms of a structural section, Park Avenue would probably only qualify as a residential
street, but with the amount of traffic on it, it would be classified as a major collector or
even an artenal street. He concurred that residences would need to be facing and
abutting the street for it to be considered a residential street.
Council Member Perkins expressed concern about the limited sight in placing stop signs
on a reverse S' curve that could create a situation for rear-end collisions, as well as a
false sense of security. He stated that there is no doubt a considerable amount of traffic
during the peak hours of school. Because it is not a normal, natural intersection of two
streets, as well as other areas of ingress and egress on the same street, he suggested
narrowing the roadway down by the use of barrier stripes to slow traffic down and mark
the area with a crossbar?intersection sign and install a flashing amber light at that
location If this does not solve the problem, then we could install boulevard stops. He
stated that he was not aware of a fatality because his information does not reflect that on
the traffic records. He felt it is the City's obligation to do their best in resolving this
problem but in doing so, he didn't wish to create another. Therefore, he was not
supportive of a stop sign at this time, but rather the suggestions he just made.
Council Member Mccartney concurred with Council Member Perkin's suggestions and
asked at what point this should be reconsidered.
Council Member Perkins stated that radar will determine if vehicles are slowing down
at the intersection and visual observation by the City and residents. He felt that if the
stop signs are installed, he would like the lens on the flashing warning light changed
from yellow to red.
Council Member McCartney commented that having established some benchmarks
already he wished to go forward and review it in approximately three months to see if
what we're doing is effective.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 16 January 18, 199i
Mr. Ministrelli cornrnented that when it is necessary to install a red light, he offered to
contribute to its Cost and suggested that it be in operation during the morning hours
because that is when it is most needed.
Council Member Perkins stated that they appreciate his offer.
Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter stated the she travels that street often taking her children to
school and sports activities. She concurred that there are no problems during the off
tirnes of school or during the evening hours, however, there is a tremendous amount of
traffic in mornings. Sometimes she has to wait three times before getting through the
signal. She felt that a stop sign should not be installed where it cannot be seen when
traveling around the corner, but was supportive of Council Member Perkins suggestions.
She felt removing the buses off the street, as well as the trucks, should make a big
difference.
Council Member Sniff felt that the ultimate solution down the road will be an activated
signal because developments will continue to grow creating more traffic. He asked that
staff prepare a cost estimate for a signal and agreed that they review Council Member
Perkins suggestions on May 1, 1994. He advised that the flashing light could be run on
batteries if there is no electricity at that location.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Perkins/Sniff that the City, on Park
Avenue south of Avenue 50 at the intersection of Dry Creek Drive and Painted Cove,
install a flashing yellow light and at approachs on both sides there be the proper
approved intersection control sign with possibly a reduced speed sign and if possible
narrow the lanes down using barriers on both sides adjacent to the curb to help restrict
the traffic and that we come back for a review at the first Council meeting in May, 1994.
In response to Council Member Sniff, Council Member Perkins advised that both
directions would be controlled by one or two amber lights.
Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-9.
At this time, Study Session No.1 was taken out of order.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 17 January 18, 199?
STUDY SESSION
INTERVIEWS OF APPLICANTS FOR VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD.
Mrs. LiCalsi, Personnel & Budget Manager, advised that eight applications were
received from those in the community expressing an interest in serving on the Volunteer
Advisory Board. Each applicant received a letter advising them of this meeting. Norris
Bernard has been functioning as a quasi Volunteer Coordinator and staff recommended
appointing him officially to the position of Volunteer Coordinator, being a separate and
distinct position from the three member board.
The Council then conducted interviews of the following individuals:
Diane Adolph
Louis Glick
Dan Newman
Mrs. LiCalsi advised that 3udy Vossler, who was also an applicant, was in attendance
but had to leave for a meeting at work. Now that Ms. Vossler has a new position with
KSL, she said that she now has the time to serve. Her employer also supports her
serving in this capacity.
Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter asked if the Council wished to continue the interview at the
next meeting to give the other applicants an opportuntiy to be interviewed or if they
wished to proceed.
Council Member Perkins had no hesitation in voting for an applicant that wasn't present
based on the information in their resume and felt they should move forward. He further
stated that he was not sure what the Committee's role is and how they are going to be
functioning or operating. He felt their role needs clarification and it is only fair to those
serving on the Board that they have a very good understanding of what the Council will
be requiring of them.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter, Mrs. LiCalsi advised that the City Clerk gave
each applicant a copy of the ordinance which was summarized in the staff report.
Council Member Sniff felt that they should move forward and make the appointments.
Once appointed, the first order of business should be that they have clear, unambiguous
direction of their responsibilities and role because he sensed confusion from the
applicants.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 18 January 18, 1994
Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter felt that the applications they have received reflect their
capability. They will be very beneficial to this program, as well as overseer of some of
the volunteers.
The Council balloted for the appointments. Said ballots are on file in the City Clerk's
office.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins that Dan Newman be
appointed for a one year term, Judy Vossler be appointed to a full two year term, and
Diane Adolph be appointed to a full three year term on the Volunteer Advisory Board.
Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-iD.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins that Norris Bernard be
appointed as Volunteer Coordinator for a term of one year. Motion carried unanimously
with Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-11.
Council Member Perkins comrnended Mr. Norris on an excellent job and stated the
Council's appreciation for the effort and time he has given.
Council recessed to Closed Session.
CLOSED SESSION
1. Discussion of ongoing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9
A. Mike Hudson vs. City of La Quinta Case No.1-68259
B. Primerit Bank Case No.71942
2. Discussion of potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9
A. Desert Gardens CUP 93-009
3. Discussion of negotiations pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8
A. Mike Hogan's proposal for commercial development to be located on the
Boys and Girls Club site Avenue 50 and Park Avenue.
4. Discussion of personnel pursuant to Government Code Section 54957
A. Evaluation process for Council-appointed positions
B. Personnel scheduling
COUNCIL RECONVENED AT 7:00 P.M.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 19 January 18, 1?1994
PUBLIC COMMENT
Russell Robertson, 44-930 Tortola Circle, addressed the Council requesting that Public Hearing
Item No.3 be heard this evening and not be continued.
PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter presented the following La Quinta Beautiful Awards for the month
of December:
Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Yanez, 78-825 Villeta Dr. Most Beautifully Decorated Outdoor Christmas
Tree
Mr. Donald Stone? 51-360 Avenida Vallejo Most Creative Use of Natural Materials
Mr. & Mrs. Scott Sharp, 54-511 Avenida Juarez Most Creative use of Lights
Mr. & Mrs. Gary Brannen, 46-324 Roudel Lane Most Holiday Spirit
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. WEED ABATEMENTS/LOT CLEANINGS AND PLACEMENT OF COSTS ON
THE 1994/95 TAX ROLLS:
A. HARBUCK, CARL APN 769-084-004 $187.50
B. GLAZER, SIMON APN 773-123-004 $187.50
C. ADAMS, MARION APN 774-153-015 $187.50
D. FISCHER, MICHAEL APN 646-311-015 $187.50
E. FISCHER, MICHAEL APN 646-311-016 $187.50
F. CAPITOL CONSTRUCTION APN 646-311-003 $187.50
G. BETTERLEY, WM. A. APN 646-312-020 $187.50
H. KIRK, KAREN APN 646-313-007 $187.50
I. MILLER, M. M. APN 646-313-014 $187.50
J. SWEET, DOROTHY E. APN 646-312-037 $187.50
K. YARU, THOMAS C. APN 646-313-005 $187.50
L. YARU, THOMAS C. APN 646-313-006 $187.50
M. LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION APN 604-251-001 $187.50
N. LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION APN 604-251-002 $187.50
0. LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION APN 604-251-003 $187.50
P. LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION APN 604-251-004 $187.50
Q. LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION APN 604-252-006 $187.50
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 20 January 18, 1994
R. LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION APN 604-252-012 $187.50
S. LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION APN 604-252-013 $187.50
T. LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION APN 604-252-024 $187.50
U. LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION APN 604-252-025 $187.50
V. LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION APN 604-252-026 $187.50
W. LA QUINTA ASSOCIATION APN 604-252-027 $187.50
Mr. Hartung, Building and Safety Director, advised that La Quinta Association Items
M through W) have paid their bills and asked that they be removed from consideration.
RESOLUTION NO.94-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA
ASSESSING LIEN AND PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION ON TAX ROLLS ON
CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE.
It was moved by Council Members SnifflMcCartney that Resolution No.94-3 be adopted
with deletion of properties noted as M through W. Motion carried unanimously with
Mayor Pena absent.
2. CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT 27835 FOR APPROVAL OF SEVEN
RESIDENTIAL AIR-SPACE CONDOMINIUM LOTS, RACQUET CLUB LOT
AND MISCELLANEOUS LOTS ON 36 + GROSS ACRES, LOCATED ON THE
SOUTH SIDE OF 48TH AVENUE, WEST OF DUNE PALMS ROAD EXTENDED)
WITHIN RANCHO LA QUINTA. APPLICANT: TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT
CHARLES R. STROTHER).
Mr. Herman, Planning Director, advised that subject Tentative Tract is the second
processed for Rancho La Quinta. The proposed Tract Map is located on the south side
of 48th Avenue immediately west of Dune Palms Road if it was extended into this
project. The La Quinta Evacuation Channel borders the Tract on the easterly side. The
property to the east of the Evacuation Channel is a future phase of the project which has
not yet been planned. To the west of this project is the existing golf course, while to the
south is the temporary golf clubhouse and golf course. It proposes seven residential lots
for air-space condominium lots, a future golf clubhouse lot, two lots for parking, a water
well lot, a racquet club and pool area lot, and other miscellaneous lots. Six of the
residential lots are proposed to contain Casita duplex) products.
The Planning Commission considered this Map at their meeting of December 14, 1993
and has recommended approval subject to conditions.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 21 January 18, 1?4
Chuck Strother, Applicant, advised that he is in concurrence with all recommended
conditions.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN.
There being no one wishing to speak, the PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
RESOLUTION NO.94-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A SEVEN-LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ON
APPROXIMATELY 36+ ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF 48TH
AVENUE AND WEST OF DUNE PALMS ROAD. CASE NO. TENTATIVE
TRACT 27835 TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT.
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney that Resolution No. 944 be
adopted. Motion carried with Mayor Pena absent.
3. ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT #93-039 AMENDMENT TO TITLE
9, PLANNING AND ZONING OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE
REGARDING INTERIM HOUSE SIZE, AND COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS
WITHIN RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS. APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA.
Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter noted that Mayor Pena had asked that this matter be continued
until February 1st when he could be present to participate.
Council Member Sniff believed that there are many people concerned about this issue and
that it needs to be dealt with in an expeditious manner.
Council Member Perkins agreed that the Council needs to continue moving forward with
this matter.
Council Member McCartney concurred.
Mr. Herman. Planning Director, briefly reviewed the history of this matter. He then
proceeded to outline the issues involved as follows:
* Minimum House Size The Planning Commission recommends a minimum
house size of 1,300 sq. ft. excluding the garage. The North La Quinta residents
recommend 1,500? sq. ft.; the BIA recommends 1,200 sq. ft.; Gibson, Dunn &
Crutcher recommend the current standards of 750 sq. ft. and Stamko
recommends 1,200 sq. ft. or 1,400 sq. ft. minimum, allowing no more than 25%
of an R-1 zoned project to have houses in the range from 1,100 to 1,400 sq. ft.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 22 January 18, 199?
* Single-Family Standards The single-family development standards are similar
to the SR zone insofar as requiring two-car garages and the standard bedroom
sizes.
* Two-Story Houses A two-story house cannot be constructed adjacent to or
abutting a lot line of an existing single story home constructed in a prior phase
of the same subdivision, unless proof can be provided showing that a two-story
unit was proposed for the lot by the prior builder.
* Compatible Architectural Treatment a proposed single-family dwelling unit
must be compatible in terms of architecture, colors and roof lines.
* Landscaping At least one specimen tree shall be provided in the front or street
side yard as part of the landscape requirements.
* 10% Deviation, Smallest House Size The smallest single-family dwelling units
proposed within a partially- developed subdivision may deviate in size so that the
proposed units are no more than 10% smaller in size than the smallest previously-
built unit in the subdivision.
Mr. Herman noted that the Planning Commission, on a 4-1 vote Commissioner Adolph
voting no) recommended the adoption of the regulations as outlined and detailed in the
staff report.
The Mayor Pro Tem declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN.
Allan Levin, representing the Building Industry Association, addressed the Council,
noting that the standards being adopted this evening will apply to all of La Quinta except
the SR Zone. He then referred to the house size requirements in all of the valley cities,
noting that they are all at 1,200 sq. ft. except for Rancho Mirage which is at 1,400 sq.
ft. and Indian Wells. The BIA believes that 1,200 sq. ft. is an appropriate house size
in order for people to have the ability to purchase a new home. He also noted that under
the proposed ordinance, a precise plan will have to be filed for each residential unit,
which will be expensive and time consuming for the developer. He suggested a precise
plan be required for each five identical units. Regarding compatibility standards, he
advised that some cities have created a sphere of compatibility, and suggested that the
City limit its compatibility to only two lots around an existing unit and beyond that,
permit a 25% deviation. Additionally, regarding the mix, he believed that it should be
market driven, not dictated by the City.
Jennie Plants, felt that the majority of the people are tired of dealing with this issue and
hopes that it is resolved this evening. These homeowners have a major investment in
their homes and ask that the City not do anything that will cause them to lose any more
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 23 January 18,
than they already have as a result of the economy.
Bill Simmons, 45-455 Desert Eagle Court, advised that the last appraisal on his home
was $35,000 less than it was previously. He felt that this issue has dragged on long
enough and wished to see the standards that the homeowners had agreed to, adopted.
John Slater, 79-930 Horseshoe Road, advised that he has bought and sold over $10
million worth of land in the Coachella Valley and finds it reprehensible to sell a piece
of property with misrepresentations. He felt that even a 10% deviation is morally
wrong.
Wally Reynolds, 79-860 Fiesta, advised that the City of Indio is trying to find land in
which to build larger homes while the City of La Quinta seems to be determined to do
just the opposite. He asked if the images of the two cities will soon reverse.
Michael Main, 48-295 Alder Lane, Palm Desert, representing the Building Industry
Association, advised that he's been a part of the study group for this issue and at no time
has there been a compromise made. They have suggested a committee made up of the
City Council, Planning Commission, BIA and residents in order to go through the issues
one a time. He continued to believe that such a committee is needed.
Russell Robertson, commented that there was a committee formed in which no
agreement could be reached and didn't feel there was a necessity to form another. He
requested that Council take action on this issue this evening.
Joan Burndt, 79-120 Ladera, referred to Mr. Pippin's letter contained in the staff
report) and commented that this is not a racial issue, the homeowners are only trying to
maintain their property values so that they don't lose their equity.
Bruce Strickland, 10670 Civic Center, Rancho Cucamonga, representing Forecast
Homes, spoke in opposition to the proposed ordinance and referred to a letter which the
City Council received from Gibson, Dunn and Crutcher, which states that the proposal
would limit the ability of property owners in single-family subdivisions that are partially
built-out to change the house sizes in those subdivisions. They feel that the ordinance
is discriminatory and in violation of California Government Code Section 65961.
T.J. McCauhey, 79-350 Desert Rock Ct., stated that he has a lot of money invested in
his property and was convinced that a smaller home in his neighborhood will devalue his
property.
Robert Tyler, commented on the fax the City received from the BIA and its contents.
He requested that the Council act on this issue at this time. He also reserved the right
to speak on the proposed resolution increasing fees.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 24 January 18, 1?
Donna Horn, 44-155 Ocotillo, hoped that the people she helped to elect, will vote this
evening to represent th? people who elected them.
Barbara Irwin, 44-065 Camino La Cresta, commented that the consistency ordinance
has come a long way and they are encouraged by the involvement of everyone
concerned. She supported a minimum house size of 1,400 sq. ft. and a deviation of 10%
in existing subdivisions. She urged that the Council move forward with the ordinance.
Lance Eldred, 79-315 Desert Rock Court, referred to a recent newspaper article
regarding resales in the communities of Palm Desert, Indio and La Quinta, noting that
La Quinta is falling behind. He urged Council action to maintain high standards for the
City of La Quinta.
Louis Glick, did not believe that the City Council has been representing the people.
Ben Bean, 44-125 Camino Azul, realtor, stated that he could confirm that building small
homes next to larger ones drastically decrease the value of the homes
John James, 78-760 Carnes, advised that he moved from the Cove to Acacia to get away
from the smaller lots and rentals. He felt that if smaller homes are allowed to be built,
that many will turn into rentals.
Salley Gann, 74-740 Highway 111, asked the Council separate the issue of house size
and compatibility standards within existing subdivisions. She noted that Palm Desert and
Indio have smaller square foot houses and they have been able to maintain property
values and resales as referred to by Mr. Eldred.
Joyce Smith, 47-350 Via Caron, expressed dismay at a Palm Desert individual speaking
to a La Quinta issue.
Stephanie Copeland, discussed the issue of property values and the definition of Gem
of the Desert."
Bruce Mercy, 79-080 Ladera, felt that the Council has heard from the people and the
property owners believe that a minimum house size of 1,400 sq ft. is appropriate with
a 10% deviation within existing subdivisions
Chris Clarke, representing STAMKO, advised that she and her partner own a great deal
of land in La Quinta and proceeded to quote some statistics relative to projected growth
of the valley as well as the projected housing market. She agreed with the property
owners about maintaining consistency within existing subdivisions. However, regarding
minimum house size, she believed that the City needs to allow the builder some
flexibility. As an alternative, she suggested establishing a 1,400 sq. ft. minimum
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 25 January 18, 1?allowing no more than 25% of an R-1 zoned project to have residential houses in the
range from 1,100 sq. ft. to 1,400 sq. ft. She cautioned that the City doesn't discourage
first-time home-buyers and empty nesters.
Chris Stuart, 78-590 Forbes, believed that smaller homes will result in crime,
burglaries, graffiti, etc. There are a lot of nice developments in La Quinta and that
direction should be maintained.
Rick Doolittle, 48-132 Via Hermosa, believed that the City needs to stay clear of
dictating minimum house sizes and letting the market dictate size. Regarding
compatibility, he felt that 10% is too restrictive it should be judged on a case-by-case
basis. Perhaps a 10% deviation in each subsequent phase with a cap of 30%.
Ron Wosniak, 44-210 Mariposa, advised that of all the subdivisions he had to choose
from, he chose Cactus Flower and does not want a developer to come in and build
smaller homes next to him. He believed that the people have let their feelings be known.
Jeanine Robertson, 44-930 Tortola, advised that the people are concerned that there may
have been discussions between the City and the BIA and that an agreement has been
reached. She commented that the people are trying to protect their investment and the
ambiance of their community as well as tourism. She suggested that the Council
consider development agreements to protect property values. She added that the City has
a legal right to dictate a maximum of 10% deviation in house size in existing
subdivisions and encouraged them to do so.
Debra Yanez, 78-825 Villeta, commented on a previous application made by Century
Homes and that she felt that she wasn't given sufficient opportunity to comment on that
issue.
Reynaldo Hernandez, 46-400 Dune Palms Road, believed that it's the people who make
a City not the size of the homes. There are many people who have also made
investments in 1,200 sq. ft. homes.
There being no one else wishing to speak, the Mayor Pro Tem declared the PUBLIC
HEARING CLOSED.
Council Member Sniff thanked everyone for their input on this significant issue. He
believed that the Council has moved forward on this issue quickly, knowing that it needs
to be resolved. He commented that this Council represents everyone the homeowners
and builders alike. This community welcomes all ethnic backgrounds all backgrounds
are the fabric of the City and will continue to be. Regarding the comments in the BIA
letter, he felt that it was unfortunate and not productive. The issues to be dealt with are:
1) fairness; 2) compatibility; and 3) consistency. The Council has to consider what's
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 26 January 18, 1994
best for the community, recognizing what's within the law and defensible. He supported:
1) a minimum house size of 1,400 sq. ft.; 2) a 10% deviation from the minimum and
maximum house sizes; 3) deletion of all references to the Design Review Board in the
proposed ordinance; and 4) that in the future, notices will be Sent to everyone within
1,000'. He believed that what he supported is the simplest, most reasonable, fair, legally
defensible, clear, defined solution.
In response to Council Member McCartney, Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that
the Planning Commission has the ability to include approval of the compatibility of units
by limiting the number of a type of particular unit. There was also a reference that there
needs to be a specific plan made for each house and there is no such requirement. She
believed that the whole purpose of the particular ordinance is to insure compatibility and
consistency within a particular project and to prevent a developer from coming in with
a 10% deviation and use their smallest plan throughout. It allows for the Planning
Commission to take a look at the composition of proposed number of different units,
which is appropriate for this particular type of ordinance. She did not believe that it puts
the City at legal risk. The developer can choose not to go forward with a particular
project if they feel that it's unmarketable in its' particular configuration.
Council Member McCartney asked if the City Attorney is comfortable that the language
in the ordinance is consistent throughout and she advised that she is. This is a new
concept for the City and if something arises that causes confusion in the future, it can be
brought back to the Council to address at a later time.
Council Member Perkins expressed his appreciation for the turnout and for the time and
effort the people and the BIA have taken to furnish the City with information. He was
concerned that there were comments made that perhaps the Council had already made a
bargain with someone and that this Council has not been available. He has always been
accessible and has talked to many of the people involved and has met with many groups
as well as the BIA, and has walked various areas to get input from the people. The
Council takes the wishes of the people very seriously. The City needs to make sure that
what they do is legal, noting that there is presently a Court challenge. Regarding the
financial issue, he didn't think that was something they should be addressing, noting that
the values in his neighborhood has also decreased due to a number of factors Regarding
formation of a committee, he felt that there has been plenty of time for everyone to make
their comments and provide input and the Planning Commission did an excellent job.
Regarding square footage, he didn't believe that we're Out of line with the rest of the
Coachella Valley. The City is taking care of the senior citizens and low-income people
as is required by law. He supported a 10% deviation in house sizes within existing
subdivisions; and was torn on the 1,400 sq. ft. minimum house size he preferred to see
1,300 sq. ft., but will support the rest of the Council.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 27 January 18, 199?
Council Member McCartney referred to his proposal which was based on an assumption
that he didn't feel that there was a proper rationale put forth at that time) regarding the
size of the house and compatibility standards. He felt that a simple rationale that was
based upon the amount of homes that were being developed i.e. the more homes being
built, the larger deviation would be allowed). It was a concept paper for the Council and
the people to react to. The reactions he's received has been mixed. His intention was
to adopt an ordinance that protects the homeowners rights as presented to them, as well
as protecting the builders rights as granted by the City and achieves the City's
expectations for that development. He supported a minimum house size of 1400 sq. ft.
and a 10% deviation of house sizes within existing subdivisions and deletion of any
mention of the Design Review Board from the ordinance.
Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter commented that there are different zones in the City. If the
1,400 sq. ft. goes through, that does not affect the Cove area that will remain at 1,200
sq. ft. The Council's concern is for the entire community people and builders alike.
The Council must look at many issues including the legal aspect. She supported a 10%
deviation and had a problem with 1,400 sq. ft., but would support it. Regarding
affordable homes in the community, she noted that the City is mandated by law to have
a certain amount of affordable and low-income housing in the City. The actions being
taken here tonight will not affect that.
In response to Council Member Sniff, Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that the
changes the Council makes to the ordinance will be reflected in a clean copy which will
be brought back for second reading.
In response to Council Member Perkins, Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that the
interim zoning ordinance will become null and void when this ordinance is effective,
which will be 30 days from second reading, which is anticipated for February 1, 1994.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to take up Ordinance No.
242 by title and number only and waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously
with Mayor Pena absent.
ORDINANCE NO 242
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE
BY AMENDING THE MINIMUM HOUSE SIZE AND CREATING
COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND
CONFIGURATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. CASE NO.
ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 93-039.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 28 January 18, 1994
Ms. Honeywell suggested the following amendments:
Section 2(H) change 1,300 to 1,400.
Section 5(1) change 1,300 to 1,400
Section 9.25.030(8) change to read The single-family dwelling units proposed within
a partially-developed subdivision shall not deviate by more than 10% from the square
footage of the existing or approved Units.
Section 9.25.040 Delete
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Mccartney that Ordinance No. 242 be
introduced on first reading. Motion carried by the following Vote:
AYES: Council Members Mccartney, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Mayor Pena
Robert Tyler, 44-215 Villeta, commented on the proposed increase in fees relating to
compatibility review and precise plan applications and that he felt that the increase is
excessive. He felt that the home-owners will be penalized in filing appeals.
Jeanine Robertson, asked if the fees of other cities were looked at. She felt that the
proposed fees will have a drastic effect on the homeowners. She asked how the fees
were arrived at.
Mr. Hunt, City Manager, advised that many of the City's fees are woefully inadequate
and in some places have never been reviewed at all. The proposed fees are based upon
our estimates as to what it tak?s staff to do the job. Staff will be proposing a lull
comprehensive analysis of all fees at mid-year budget review.
Council Member Sniff asked if these proposed fees have been related to other cities and
Mr. Hunt advised not at this point. The fees being recommended represents what it costs
the City of La Quinta to provide the service. The increase is tremendous, but it's been
a long time since our fees have been looked at.
Council Member Perkins felt that it's appropriate to calculate the cost of government and
charge accordingly by doing so, you can avoid hirin? additional staff in many cases.
When we do something for a taxpayer that is over and above what we do for other
taxpayers, then someone should help off-set that cost as long as it's based on actual cost.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 29 January 18, 1?1994
RESOLUTION NO.94-5
A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FEES RELATING TO COMPATIBILITY REVIEW
AND PRECISE PLAN APPLICATIONS AND APPEAL FEES.
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney that Resolution No. 94-5 be
adopted. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent.
4. AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 12.54 REGARDING TRUCK
ROUTES AND RESTRICTED ROUTES ON CITY STREETS.
Mr. Cosper, PLiblic Works Director, advised that the issue before the Council is a
proposal to adopt an ordinance which restricts truck traffic on certain streets within the
City. In order to do so, certain amendments to the Code are necessary. The first
amendment will establish truck routes with the City by designatin? a list of arterial and
collector streets on which trucks in excess of three tons must drive routes are included
as an exhibit to the ordinance). The second amendment provides an exemption to the
truck route regulation for publicly-operative transit vehicles. The third amendment will
restrict vehicles exceeding five tons from driving on certain arterial and collector streets
vulnerable to damage if subject to daily traffic.
Mr. Cosper noted that the proposed ordinance has been circulated to various agencies,
I.e. SunLine, Desert Sands Unified School District, Chamber of Commerce and Sheriff's
Department, and they have all agreed with the proposed ordinance.
Mr. Cosper also noted that staff is requesting appropriation of an additional $3,500 for
installation of 110 signs.
Mr. Cosper advised that there would be an exception for certain construction vehicles in
which encroachment permits would be issued.
Council Member McCartney asked if there was any thought given as to how to recoup
the $3,500 could there be charge for encroachment exceptions.
Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, did not believe that would be possible, as property
owners have the right to do certain construction on their property.
Council Member Mccartney asked that this item be added to the list of fees to be
studied.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 30 January 18, 1994
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN.
There being no one wishing to speak, the PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney to take up Ordinance
No. 243 by title and number only and waive further reading. Motion carried
unanimously.
ORDINANCE NO.243
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 12.56 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE.
It was moved by Council Members SnifflMccartney that Ordinance no. 243 be
introduced on first reading. Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members McCartney, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Mayor Pena
MOTION It was moved by Council Members SnifflMcCartney to direct staff to install
the appropriate signs. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Mccartney to appropriate $3,500
to the Traffic Control Sign account from the estimated unreserved fund balance for the
General Fund. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent.
STUDY SESSION.........continued
2. DISCUSSION OF MOBILE HOME RENT CONTROL REGULATIONS.
Mr. Herman, Planning Director, advised that staff has identified the following key issues
which need to be addressed when considering the adoption of a rent control ordinance:
* Provision for adequate return on investment;
* Eviction questions:
* Assumable leases;
* Vacancy control;
* Regulation of new units versus existing units; and
* Automatic rent increases.
Locally, there are three cities without rent control including La Quinta the County does).
He presented a chart showing the results of a survey conducted of valley cities with rent
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
) City Council Minutes 31 January 18, 199?
control which identified staffing; costs; makeup of board, etc.
Reynaldo Hernandez, 46-400 Dune Palms Road, advised that in the last ten years, the
owner of his trailer park has continuously increased the rent and has not kept up the
quality and improvements of the park. He noted that 50% of the residents are on fixed
incomes. They wish to have a rent control ordinance in order to have protection from
excessive rent increases.
Council Member Perkins had compassion for the situation in mobile home parks;
however, he was personally against rent control. He preferred to see a rent mediation
board instead. There are cities in California that have been very successful with rent
mediation boards. It basically calls for volunteerism between the homeowners and the
park owners. He knows of one City which has about a 95% success rate in mediating
disputes.
Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter asked if staff can check into mediation boards and report
back.
Mr. Hunt, City Manager, advised that staff could report back by February 15th.
Council Member McCartney advised that during his school days, he participated in a
control board in Berkeley and mediated a lot of disputes. They spent many years
figuring out the best way to do it and it was an emotionally charged situation. He
believed that rent control is very difficult to put into practice and felt that mediation
should be looked into. He also encouraged the renters to look into forming a cooperative
and actually buy the park, thereby taking control of their destiny and creating their own
homeowners association and standards for the park.
Council Member Sniff shared in some of the comments and concerns that have been
made and suggested that staff look at realistic alternatives and report back on the 15th
of February as suggested.
BUS[NESS SESSION..........continued
7. CONSIDERATION OF CITY ASSISTANCE TO COACHELLA VALLEY
RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT.
Mr. Bohien, Parks and Recreation Manager, advised that the District Manager of the
Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District has approached the City Manager
regarding the City's participation in the purchase and installation of new restrooms at La
Quinta Community Park. The District has some funds left from a 1988 State Bond Act,
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)City Council Minutes 32 January 18,
which it must spend, but they don't have enough to cover the full Cost of $34,556.
Therefore, they are asking that the City assist with a $5,000 contnbution.
Staff recommends approval of expenditure of the $5,000 from the Parks and Recreation
Department Salary Budget to a new Capital Account.
In response to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Bohlen presented the plans for the new
facility, which will be located directly west of the children's play equipment.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members SnifflMcCartney to approve the
District's request for City participation and to direct staff to transfer $5,000 from the
Parks and Recreation Salary Budget to a new Capital Account designated Community
Park CVPRD) Restroom Improvements". Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena
absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-12.
8. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PARKS AND WILDLIFE
BOND ACT OF 1994.
Mr. Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Director, advised that the City was approached by
Friends of the Desert Mountains, a mountain conservancy foundation located in Rancho
Mirage, requesting a resolution supporting the Parks and Wildlife Bond Act of 1994.
This Bond Act will provide grant opportunities for local governments for projects in
several categories. If the Bond Act is passed, the City could be eligible for both per
capita and competitive matching grants administered through the State of California.
RESOLUTION NO.94-6
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SUPPORT OF CALIFORNIANS FOR PARKS AND
WILDLIFE BOND ACT OF 1994.
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins that Resolution No.94-6 be adopted.
Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent.
9. CONS?ERATION OF MANAGEMENT OF PROPOSED CITY OF LA QUINTA
BOXING PROGRAM.
Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter noted that the Mayor had asked that this matter be continued.
Council Member Perkins wished to see it continued as he has some concerns which need
to be addressed.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
!) City Council Minutes 33 January 18, 199?
MOTION It was moved by Council Members SnifflMcCartney to continue the matter
of the proposed boxing program to February 1, 1994. Motion carried with Mayor Pro
Tern Bangerter voting No and Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-13.
10. CONSIDERATION OF FACILITY USE PERMIT FOR LA QUINTA ARTS
LEAGUE'S ANNUAL HOME TOUR AND WAIVER OF APPLICABLE FEES.
Mrs. LiCalsi, Personnel and Budget Manager, advised that the La Quinta Arts League
has requested use of the Civic Center facility as part of their Home Tour fundraising
event on February 12,1994 from 10:00 A.M. to 4:00 P.M. They have also requested
waiver of the $192 fee and $500 refundable cleaning deposit.
Council Member Perkins referred to a brochure he received in the mail regarding this
Home Tour and the fact that the Civic Center facility is on the tour. He expressed
concern that they did not have approval from the City prior to sending Out the brochure.
He could not support the request, commenting that they must have known about this for
some time and could have at least made a call to some of the Council Members.
Mr. Hunt, City Manager, advised that the Arts League was advised that they needed
Council approval, but they were up against a printing deadline. Staff did make it clear
that it would be a Council decision.
Council Member Sniff sympathized with them, but questioned the precedence of waiving
fees. Also, the City has to recover costs involved in making the facility available. He
also wished to strictly prohibit food and drinks inside the building and that fees not be
waived.
Council Member McCartney believed that we need to follow through on charging the
applicable fees. He didn't wish to discourage them from coming here, but he wouldn't
want to give them a gift of waiver of fees.
Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter also was not in favor of waiving the fees because the City
needs to recoup costs. She felt that this is a precarious situation since they have
published their brochure and it wouldn't look good for the City to deny it at this point.
She said that she would reluctantly support the request.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members SnifflMcCartney to approve the La
Quinta Arts League application in accordance with the Guidelines for Use of Civic
Center Facility, and that includes prohibition of all food and drinks within the building
and that all applicable fees be paid.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
")City Council Minutes 34 January 18, 1994
Council Member Perkins said that he would be voting against it because if it's approved
and another group does the same thing, a precedence would be set.
Council Member Sniff stated that the only reason he's going along with it is because
there wasn't a meeting earlier in the month when this issue could have been addressed.
Motion carried with Council Member Perkins voting NO and Mayor Pena absent.
MINUTE ORDER NO.94-14.
11. CONSIDERATION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY.
Council Member Perkins asked that this matter be continued as he has some serious
concerns with it and would like to have an opportunity to discuss them with staff. He
added that if and when this or any policy is adopted, it should be dated.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Perkins/Sniff to Continue consideration
of the Affirmative Action Policy to February 1, 1994.
Council Member Sniff asked if the City Attorney has reviewed it and Ms. Honeywell
advised that their labor attorney has reviewed it and they found it adequate.
Council Member McCartney advised that his concerns with the policy are with the
grievance procedures in terms of time-frames.
Mr. Hunt, City Manager, suggested that it be continued to February 15, 1994 to address
all of Council's concerns.
Council Member Perkins hoped that the next time a meeting is skipped, that a make-up
meeting be held so that business items don't stack up.
Motion carried unanimously. MITT'E ORDER NO.94-15.
12. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COPY FEE.
Mrs. LiCalsi, Personnel and Budget Manager, advised that the current fee schedule
establishes the copy fee as $0. 10 per page, which does not recover the costs incurred by
the City. Staff has evaluated the time and materials utilized for copy services and
calculates the costs for retrieval of a document and the first copy to be approximately
$0.95 with each additional page at $0.15. These fees are intended to be part of the
comprehensive fee study which will be brought to the Council as part of mid-year budget
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
#)City Council Minutes 35 January 18, 1998
review.
RESOLUTION NO.94-7
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
AMENDING THE FEE ESTABLISHED FOR COPY SERVICES.
It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney that Resolution No. 94-7 be
adopted. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent.
13. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM
COACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH, INC.
Mr. Genovese, Ass't. City Manager, advised that Coachella Valley Youth, Inc. has
requested funding in the amount of $1,000. If Council wishes to consider this request,
staff recommended that the funds be appropriated from the Council's Special Contingency
Account.
In response to questions by Council, Mr. Genovese advised that the City has not dealt
with this organization in the past. He had no detail as to exactly how the funds would
be spent.
Council Member McCartney wished to have more detail as to how the funds would be
spent prior to taking action on the request.
Council concurred.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Smff/McCartney to continue the request
of Coachella Valley Youth, Inc. to February 15,1994 pending additional inforrnation.
Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-16.
14. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 FOR
WHITE WATER/WASHINGTON STREET BRIDGE REVISION OF CHANNEL
LINING.
Mr. Cosper, Public Works Director, advised that the subject Change Order is a result
of a conflict with a CVWD sewer line which is obstructing installation of the channel-
lining improvements. The cost of the Change Order is $39,716.99, of which staff
anticipates reimbursements of 50% from Measure A/TUMF funds and 21.57% from SB
300 funds, leaving a balance of $11,291.54 coming from the Redevelopment Agency
Construction Account.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
$)City Council Minutes 36 January 18, 1994
Discussion ensued regarding the reason why this line WaS just discovered. Mr. Cosper
advised that the City has in the past, relied on CVWD's review of the plans, but have
now requested maps from the District showing where all of their lines are located within
the City.
Council also discussed the CVWD's responsibility in this Change Order with the City
Attorney suggesting that a claim against CVWD could be filed which would Start a
dialogue.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins to approve Contract
Change Order No.3 for the Whitewater/Washington Street Bridge project in an amount
not to exceed $11,291.54 from the Redevelopment Agency Construction Account.
Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-17.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Perkins/Sniff that the City Attorney or
City Manager be directed to file a claim against the Coachella Valley Water District in
the amount of $11,291.54 for Contract Change Order No. 3 relative to the
Whitewater/Washington Street Bridge project.
Council Member Sniff expressed concern about the level in which we wish to carry this
matter.
Council Member Perkins withdrew his motion and Council Member Sniff withdrew
his second.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Perkins/Sniff to direct the City Manager
and appropriate City staff to pursue negotiations with Coachella Valley Water District
in recouping the amount of $11,291.54 and to bring back to the Council results of those
negotiations. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER
NO.94-18.
15. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 92-1-02 FOR INSTALLATION
OF CURB AND GUTTER WITHIN PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS.
Mayor Pro Tern Bangerter abstained from this matter due to a conflict of interest and left
the dais.
Mr. Cosper, Public Works Director, advised that the matter before the Council is a
Change Order in the amount of $1,320,069 for the Phase V Improvement Project. This
Change Order results in an increase of 70 calendar days to the contract. This work is
a result of an action of the City Council to add additional areas to the project. He noted
that there are additional costs for Change Orders with Tri Lake Consultants $43,200
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
%)City Council Minutes 37 January 18, 1?
inspection), P.5.1. $13,200 testing), and Kicak & Associates $20,000 engineering) for
a total Change Order cost of $1,536,116.
In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Hunt, City Manager, advised that staff is
currently pursuing a commercial loan more in the line of a line of credit) in which we
would only incur debt in the amount that we need, up to the $1.5 million, with three
local lending institutions. The terms of the loan are still under negotiations, depending
on the lending institution.
Council Member Sniff expressed concern about moving forward with this Change Order
when the funding has not been secured.
Mr. Hunt, advised that the reasoning is due to the City having received these
irnprovements at an incredibly good cost, noting that we were originally talking about
$1. S million just for the roadwork and we have been able to secure a cost of $1.5 million
for the roadwork and ancillary work as well. Additionally, the contractor needs some
assurance so that he doesn't start moving equipment off of the project.
Council Member Sniff asked if it's prudent to approve the Change Order when the
funding, while it's pending, is still uncertain. He also wondered if the City is going to
have to collateralize the loan.
Mr. Hunt advised that staff shares those concerns and cautions, but because of the
favorable cost, he felt that it was prudent to bring it forward.
Council Member McCartney felt that the questions are appro-priate, but was happy to
see that staff was able to negotiate this deal for $1.5 million. He felt that it's important
to send the correct message back to the contractor what the City's intent is. Certainly,
any project of this kind is subject to appropriate financing. He felt confident that we will
be able to secure a proper loan to get the work done.
Council Member Sniff asked if the contractor has committed to holding the cost figure
for a certain period of time and Mr. Cosper advised that the cost is based on unit costs
that are in the contract so they will remain in place. However, the problem we run into
is that we begin to lose equipment and he starts to downgrade his operation.
Mr. Hunt believed that we could get a 35-day commitment from the contractor.
Council Member Perkins felt that the reason for the $1.5 million is because the
contractor has the equipment in place. He felt that we are looking at 30-days max.
Worst case scenario would be that we would sign a contract for the Change Order and
not have the money. Will there be a penalty for backing out of the contract?
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
&)City Council Minutes 38 January 18, 1?1994
Mr. Cosper advised that it will depend upon whether he has started the work before we
cancel the Contract.
Council Member Perkins suggested that Council urge staff to pursue, as rapidly as
possible, the required funding on a line of credit and try to work with the contractor to
see what kind of time period we have without losing the $1.5 million figure.
Council Member Sniff stated that he would feel more comfortable with continuing this
matter for two weeks and during that time, staff can continue securing a loan.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members PerkinslMcCartney to continue the
matter of Contract Change Order No.92-1-02 relative to Phase V improvements to
February 1, 1994. Motion carried unanimously with Mayor Pro Tem Hangerter and
Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-19.
16. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 30, 1993.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members PerkinslMcCartney to receive and file
the Treasurer's Report dated November 30, 1993: Motion carried unanimously with
Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-20.
17. APPROVAL OF CHANGE TO TRAVEL AND EXPENSE POLICY TO ALLOW
FOR CITY MANAGER APPROVAL OF TRAVEL WHEN TIMING DOES NOT
ALLOW FOR COUNCIL REVIEW.
Council Member Sniff questioned the rationale for this requested action.
Mr. Hunt, City Manager, advised that there have been instances in which there wasn't
an opportunity to process a travel request through Council. An example was in August
we had an opportunity to send a staff member to a budgeted conference and because the
Council was dark, there wasn't an opportunity to process it through the Council.
Council Member McCartney believed that the City Manager needs some flexibility in
these matters.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter, Mr. Hunt advised that should a situation come
up in which he would approve a travel request, he certainly would place such a memo
in Council's boxes.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
')City Council Minutes 39 January 18, 19'I
MOTION It was moved by Council Members PerkinslMcCartney to approve the
change to the Travel and Expense Policy to provide for City Manager approval of travel
when timing does not allow for Council review. Motion carried unanimously with
Council Member Sniff voting NO and Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-
21.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED JANUARY 4, 1994 AND
JANUARY 18, 1994.
2. TAKEN UP AS BUSINESS SESSION NO.17.
3. APPROVAL OF TEMPORARY NO-PARKING ZONES AND OTHER TRAFFIC
CONTROLS FOR THE BOB HOPE CHRYSLER CLASSIC GOLF
TOURNAMENT.
4. APPROVAL OF QUITCLAIM DEED FOR TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT
ON TRACT 25389- DUNA LA QUINTA.
5. ACCEPTANCE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PARCELS FOR CALLE TAMPICO CUL-
DE-SACS.
6. ACCEPTANCE OF THE LA QUINTA EMPLOYEE'S ASSOCIATION'S
DONATION OF A WEIGHT MACHINE AND TREADMILL.
7. RECEIVE AND FILE THE ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT FOR THE LA QUINTA
FINANCING AUTHORITY.
8. RECEIVE AND FILE THE ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT FOR THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA.
9. APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT FOR mE
SENIOR CENTER XTENSION OF CURRENT LEASE) WITH MARUKO, INC.
10. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE LA
QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION COMMENCING ON JULY 1,1993
AND TERMINATING ON JUNE 30, 1994.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
()City Council Minutes 40 January 18,
11. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT TIlE TERMS APPROVED
BY RESOLUTION NO. APPLY TO ALL CITY EMPLOYEES COMMENCING
ON JULY 1, 1993 AND TERMINATING ON JUNE 30, 1994.
12. APPROVAL OF EXTENSION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PARC LA
QUINTA.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins that the Consent Calendar
be approved as recommended with the exception of Item No. 3. Motion carried
unanimously with Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-22.
CONSENT ITEM NO.3 It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Perkins that
Consent Item No.3 be approved as recommended. Motion carried with Council Member
Mccartney and Mayor Pena absent. MINUTE ORDER NO.94-23.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
Mr. Bohien, Parks and Recreation Director, reminded the Council of the joint meeting of the
City Council and Community Services Commission for 6:00 P.M. on Monday, January 24,
1994.
MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS
1. DISCUSSION OF LIGHTING THROUGHOUT THE CITY FOR
DECORATIVE/SAFETY PURPOSES.
Mr. Hunt, City Manager, advised that the Mayor is asking for authorization for the staff
to explore the possibility of low level lighting similar to that found in PGA West for
other areas of the community.
Council agreed on asking staff to explore the possibilities of low level lighting as
requested.
2. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF COACHELLA VALLEY ENTERPRISE
ZONE AUTHORITY FOR SPONSORSHIP OF 1994 BUSINESS WEEK
PRESIDENTS FORUM.
Mayor Pro Tem Bangerter noted that this matter was placed on the agenda by Mayor
Pena.
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02
)) City Council Minutes 41 January 18, 199?
Council Member McCartney felt that while it appears to be an outstanding fomm, he was
hesitant about spending $1,000 toward this effort
Council concurred.
CLOSED SESSION.......continued
1. DISCUSSION OF ON-GOING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9
A. MIKE HUDSON VS CITY OF LA QUINTA CASE NO.1-68259
B. PRIMERIT BANK CASE NO.71942
2. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54956.9
A. DESERT GARDENS CUP 93-009
3. DISCUSSION OF NEGOTIATIONS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8
A. MIKE HOGAN'S PROPOSAL FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO
BE LOCATED ON THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB SITE AVE. 50 AND
PARK AVE.
4. DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL PURSUANT TO GOVERMMENT CODE
SECTION 54957
A. EVALUATION PROCESS FOR COUNCIL-APPOINTED POSITIONS
B. PERSONNEL SCHEDULING.
Council reconvened with no action being taken.
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,djz?
SAUNDRA L JUHOLA)<ty Clerk
City of La Quinta California
BIB]
01-13-96-U01
11:41:34AM-U01
CCMIN011894-U02