Loading...
1993 05 18 CC MinutesD LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MAY 18, 1993 Regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at the hour of 3:00 P.M. by Mayor Pena, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Council Members Bangerter, McCartney, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena ABSENT: None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Mr Hunt City Manager, advised that the Council has received a letter from Paul Quill regarding Phase V improvements. Mr. Hunt also advised that the interviews for Investment Advisory Board will be held at the 7:00 P. M portion of the meeting instead of the afternoon session. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter that the Council Minutes of May 4, 1993 be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. ANNOUNCEMENTS Mayor Pena advised that on Friday there will be a memorial to fallen Police Officers at the Palm Desert Civic Center Park at 6:30 P.M. PUBLIC COMMENT Wally Reynolds, 79-860 Fiesta Dr., advised that when Redevelopment Agency Project Area 2 was formed he was on the committee. He understood that when development occurred in the area residential or commercial) it would generate funds for improvements within that area. He and his neighbors have been advised that the improvements within the Westward Ho area may not occur for five years. They understand the City's financial constraints, but they ask that the City bring their streets up to safe standards. Beverly Sfingi, 79-915 Horseshoe Road, asked that the City explore the possibility of deeding their streets back to the property owners in the Westward Ho area so that they can form their own assessment district. They have waited for five years and are now being asked to wait another five years, which is too long. BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 2 May 18, 1993 Roxanne Voigt, 52-658 Eisenhower, addressed the Council on the matter of a Stockman" home she purchased with the help of the Redevelopment Agency. She commented on the items on her punch-list which should have been taken care of six months ago. She asked for Council's assistance in getting these items taken care of. Council Member Sniff suggested that staff look into this matter and respond. Mr. Hartung, Building and Safety Director, advised that staff has begun an investigation and will be assisting her in anyway we can. Paul Quill, 51-245 Avenida Rub io, read a letter which he addressed to the City Council and is on file in the City Clerk's office. The letter was relative to Assessment District 92-1 Phase V improvements. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE a. Letter from Coachella Valley Community Concerts Association requesting office space, furniture and equipment. Staff to respond. b. Letter from Westward Ho Property Owners' Association requesting street improvements. Council Member Sniff believed that there needs to be some sincere contact and effort from staff promptly, with the residents to determine if there is an interim solution to their problems. Mayor Pena suggested that staff meet with Mr. Reynolds and Mr. Palmer and see if something can be done. In response to Council Member Perkins, Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that if they want to pay for the streets themselves; the speediest way would be for the City to create an assessment district. c. Letter from Fred Wolff regarding use of copy machine for Bystrice Think Tank. Council Member Bangerter advised that she has become aware of the extent of the City's involvement in the Bystrice Think Tank and asked if the Council wished to reconsider BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 3 May 18, 1993 their previous decision of not allowing the use of the City's copy machine. Mayor Pena expressed concern about setting a precedent and opening the doors to other organizations. He noted that the Arts Foundation and local businessmen also have copy machines which might be made available for this use Council Member Sniff felt that there is a demonstrable relationship between the City and the Bystrice Think Tank which would set this request apart from others. He supported setting a limit of $5.00 per month for these copies. Mayor Pena believed that if this request is going to be approved, then a policy needs to be established. Council Member McCartney agreed that this is a unique situation and these requests can be addressed on a case-by-case basis. Council Member Sniff believed that there needs to be some formality as to the amount and suggested that it be limited to $5.00 per month as requested and if there needs to be an adjustment, they can bring it back to the City Council for re-evaluation and any other request should be on a case-by-case basis. Council concurred. d. Letter from the Office of the Grand Jury regarding the Coachella Valley Mosquito Abatement District. Mayor Pena suggested that we talk to the City's representative to get his comments. Council concurred. C. Letter from Paul Quill regarding Assessment District 92-1 Phase V Improvements. Read under Public Comment. BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 4 May 18, 1993 BUSINESS SESSION ACCEPTANCE OF REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON PLOT PLAN 93-495 REVISION) TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF MIXED-USE COMMERCIAL PROJECT AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 111 AND WASHINGTON STREET ON 5.6 ACRES IN A C-P-S COMMERCIAL ZONE. APPLICANT: MR. PHILIP PEAl), PRESIDENT OF SIMON PLAZA. Mr. Herman, Planning Director, advised that Plot Plan 93-495 is a revision to Plot Plan 91-466 which expired in 1993. The revised Plot Plan eliminated the bowling alley, the fitness center and created a configuration of a two-story parking garage; a four-story office building; a restaurant and a medical complex by the restaurant The revised plan eliminated about 44,000 sq. ft. from the original proposal. The Planning Commission conducted a public bearing on May 11th and recommended approval on a 4-1 vote. He then pointed out some of the modifications made by the Planning Commission which included elimination of some Design Review Board considerations and a condition relating to some improvements to Washington Street including participation in the signal at Highway 111/Simon Dr. The original conditions were recommended as being consistent with prior recommendations of staff and prior actions of the City Council whereby adjacent developers pay their proportionate share of street improvements to the centerline. The condition recommended by staff was an attempt to create a condition to have the City do the necessary improvements on Washington and the intersection, with the applicant reimbursing the City The revision by the Planning Commission will cost the City an additional $150,000. The conditions added by the Planning Commission deals with a theme plaza at the intersection of Hwy. 111/Washington and limiting the office complex to three stories as opposed to four stories. Council Member Mccartney asked how the $150,000 was arrived at and Mr. Speer, Ass't. City Engineer, advised that it is based upon $3.00 per sq. ft. for the median and based on an approximate amount for the incremental widening Mr. Herman noted that the Council cannot change any conditions unless they call it up for public hearing. Phil Pead, 78-611 Highway 111, applicant, presented the conceptional elevations for the three-story office building. Regarding the comments relative to sharing the cost of street improvements, when you look at the density of the project going from 126,000 sq. ft. down to 82,000 sq. ft.; it's economically inviable for them to make those improvements. The fact that they lowered the building to three stories and put the third story on the parking garage increased their cost greatly. BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 5 May 18, 1993 Council Member McCartney questioned the number of employees anticipated and whether or not a child care center is being included and Mr. Pead advised that there will be about 150 employees; also a child care center was included in the original proposal, but not in the revised plan. They had a 1,500-2,000 sq. ft. child care center with outdoor facilities. Council Member McCartney felt that with 150 employees there should be a child care center provided, recognizing that it can be more modest than originally proposed. Mayor Pena expressed concern about the Planning Commission imposing a condition on the City that we share in the $150,000 of the street widening and questioned whether or not that authority is vested in the Planning Commission. His other concern was the reduction in the applicants share of the traffic signal. Mr. Herman, Planning Director, advised that the overall density was reduced by 44,000 sq. ft. and the applicant made a strong pitch to the Planning Commission that they put in the prior improvements when the Parcel Map was created in the County. He assumed that the Planning Commission felt that they were burdening the applicant again for those improvements. He pointed Out to the Planning Commission that the City has always attached like conditions to projects. This condition is not consistent with conditions imposed on others, citing TDC who had to build half the streets. Mayor Pena was concern that we meet all the Specific Plan policies established for Highway 111 and Mr. Herman advised that this project meets the General Plan and zoning requirements for construction of this project along Highway 111. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Herman advised that the applicant is conditioned to pay for the street widening on Washington St. from the curb to the new property line including the sidewalk; to participate in the signal at Highway 111/Washington in the amount of 5%; to participate in the signal at Highway 111/Simon at 12.5%; and to participate in their proportionate share of Highway 111 improvements and dedication of land. Mr. Phil Pead advised that they have about $740,000 in engineering costs involved in this project. In response to Council Member Bangerter, Mr. Herman advised that the applicant constructed the prior infrastructure. Fred Simon, advised that they were never notified of the General Plan change for the Washington St. corridor and therefore, never had an opporturnty to participate in that discussion. When the parcel in question was improved, they dedicated 60' to Washington St. and they're dedicating another 1/2 now and they put in the road and BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 6 May 18, 1993 curb/gutter/sidewalkslhydrants and drainage. Council Member Sniff felt that this is an unusual situation and would support the Planning Commission recommendation. Council Member McCartney would have liked to have the opportunity to require a child care facility. Council Member Sniff commented that they have indicated that they would give it some consideration and Council Member Bangerter suggested that there are other child care things going on in the Valley they could participate in. In answer to Council Member Perkins, Mr. Herman advised that the three-story structure is 40' and the top of the tower is 50'. MOTION It was moved by Council Member Sniff/Perkins to accept the report of the Planning Commission action on Plot Plan 93-495 revision to allow construction of a mixed-use commercial project(182,013) sq. ft. on +5.6 acres at the southeast corner of Highway 111 and Washington St. in C-P-S Zone. Applicant: Simon Plaza, Inc., Mr. Philip Pead. Motion carried unanirnously. MINUTE ORDER NO.93-119. 2. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF CIVIC CENTER CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.68- AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT. Mr. Reynolds, Public Works Director, advised that this is the sixth and final change order relative to the ADA. The amount of the change order is $14,572 and recommended approval. Jim Collins, legislative Analyst with the Paralyzed Veterans of America, advised that he has been involved in the ADA and represents the Department of Rehabilitation and wished to be sure that people with disabilities are considered in the design of the Civic Center and that it complies with the ADA. He has offered his services to review the building to make sure it complies, but has not been contacted. Mayor Pena advised that staff will be in contact with him. MOTION It was moved by Council Members SnifflMcCartney to approve Civic Center Contract Change Order No.68 in the amount of $14,572 and authorize the City Manager to execute same. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.93-120. BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 7 May 18, 1993 3. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF PROCEDURES TO FORM PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE FOR PROJECT AREA NO. 1/NO. 2 MERGER. Council Member Bangerter abstained due to a conflict of interest and left the dais. Mr. Genovese, Ass't. City Manager, advised that the matter before the Council is adoption of procedures for the formation of a Project Area Committee for the merger of the Redevelopment Project Areas No.1 and No.2. The primary role of the PAC is to provide input to the Agency on policy matters that deal with the plarming and provision of residential facilities and replacement housing for those that may be displaced by the merged project and other policy matters that affect residents within the Project Area. The PAC will be formed at a meeting on June 7th at La Quinta Middle School. RESOLUTION NO.93-41 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ADOPTING PROCEDURES FOR THE FORMATION OF A PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE FOR THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND PROJECT NO.2 AS PROPOSED TO BE MERGED AND CALLING FOR THE FORMATION OF A PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Mccartney that Resolution No. 93-41 be adopted as submitted. Motion carried unanimously with Council Member Bangerter absent. 4. CONSIDERATION OF SPACE UTILIZATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE AREA OF THE CIVIC CENTER. Mr. Hunt, City Manager, advised that as directed on May 4th, staff has taken a look at the administrative area of the Civic Center and has come up with three options. He recommended that Option No. 1 be approved at an estimated cost of $7,500. Additionally, he recommended that staff come back to the Council three months after move-in with a space-utilization analysis based on actual use of the facility. Council Member Sniff advised that he has given this matter a lot of thought and isn't in favor of doing any reconstruction work at this time. He preferred to 1) move-in as originally programmed; or 2) move-in leaving the City Manager's office vacant and moving all offices downward not doing any reconstruction work at this time. He preferred Option 2. Mayor Pena believed that we should move-in as originally planned and let staff come back with any suggestions for change after three months. BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 8 May 18, 1993 Council Member Perkins concurred, saying that he could not support any reconstruction at this time. Council Member Mccartney agreed that no additional monies should be spent at this time, but he supported making the City Manager's office a reference library as indicated in Option 1. Council Member Bangerter did not wish to spend any additional money at this time and had no strong feelings either way whatever the City Manager feels comfortable with was fine with her. MOTION It was moved by Council Member Perkins/Mayor Pena that no modifications be made to the administrative area of the Civic Center and that staff is to return to Council three months after move-in with a space-utilization analysis based on actual use of the facility. Mayor Pena felt that we need to move-in and if the City Manager wants to move-in the Manager's office, he can, if he doesn't, that's part of his analysis. Council Member Sniff preferred to see us move-in the way we're going to be rather than moving again after move-in. He preferred that the City Manager's office be left for Council's use for two Council Members and wished to see that done up-front. He could not support the motion if it's going to be left up to the City Manager he wanted to see the use of that office pre-determined. Council Member McCartney concurred with Council Member Sniff. Motion failed to carry with Council Members Bangerter, Sniff and McCartney voting NO. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney to move-in into the new Civic Center and that the currently designated City Manager's office be left vacant for other determined uses at an early date and that all the administrative offices be moved down one level. Motion carried with Council Member Perkins voting NO. MINUTE ORDER NO.93-121. BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 9 May 18, 1993 CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED MAY 18,1993. 2. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE OF BENEFIT TO THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD AND DEThRMINING THAT NO OTHER REASONABLE MEANS OF FINANCING ARE AVAILABLE TO THE COMMUNITY WHITEWATER BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS). MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/McCartney that the Consent Calendar be approved as recommended with Item No. 2 being approved by RESOLUTION NO.93-42. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.93- 122. DEPARTMENT REPORTS Mr. Hunt, City Manager, advised that staff has distributed the Emergency Medical Services Multi-System Plan and there are a number of public hearings coming up. Staff is looking for Council, 5 direction as to attendance. Council concurred on directing staff to attend and report back. Council Member McCartney asked staff to report back on the objective that was in the packet relating to financing the Riverside County EMS System. Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, advised that the Aihambra case against the State is going forward it's at the Trial Court. There is a movement to solicit other cities to join with Alhambra or a second suit that addresses the same issues. Mr. Herman, Planning Director, reminded the Council of the joint meeting with the Planning Commission/Design Review Board on May 25th at 7:00 P.M. Mr. Reynolds, Public Works Director, advised that carpeting is due to be installed in the Civic Center May 28th with furniture due for move-in June 7th. The contractor is looking for substantial completion by June 15th and it appears that the schedule for move-in of July 10th is remaining firm. He also noted that he was interviewed by KESQ on-site today. BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 10 May 18, 1993 Council Member Sniff asked that staff address Mr. Langer's request and clarify the matter. MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER ITEMS Discussion Regarding Direction to Staff to Analyze the Formation of a Neighborhood Action Program. Council Member Bangerter presented a proposal to form a Neighborhood Action Program and asked Council if they would be interested in directing staff to look into the possibility. The idea behind the program is to promote citizen awareness and participation in local government. It would help citizens to communicate their concerns to City policy-makers and professional staff. Some issues they could be involved in would be land development, traffic, public safety, etc. She then outlined the proposal in more detail regarding number of teams, membership, etc. written proposal is on file in the City Clerk's office). Council Member McCartney felt that it's an excellent idea that it would give each neighborhood greater control over their area and would provide the City with a better means of communication with the various neighborhoods. He's had preliminary discussions with Ron Loveridge, a Council Member in Riverside, who was instrumental in starting these neighborhood action teams in Riverside. They have been warmly received in that City. He suggested that staff be directed to investigate the proposal and to contact Mr. Loveridge. Council Member Sniff supported the idea, but there are a number of questions, such as, definition, role, power, membership, how appointed/dismissed, term, geographic areas, relationship to property owners associations, staff support, recordkeeping, frequency of meetings, selection of officers, Brown Act, etc. He suggested that we start with a proto- type and see how it works. Council Member Perkins supported the idea, but had concerns and questioned the goal there needs to be something specific for them to focus on. He was also concerned about staff time involved. He agreed with starting with a proto-type. Mayor Pena said that Council Member Sniff raised a number of questions which should be taken into consideration and asked if this would be taking away some power from the Planniiig Commission. Staff time is a concern. He wasn't opposed to organizing residents of the community to be active, but had a lot of concerns about the appointment process and powers they may have and whether or not they would be subject to the Brown Act. BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 11 May 18, 1993 Council Member Sniff suggested that staff be asked to bring this back as an agenda item at the next meeting and then decide whether or not to refer it to staff for investigation. Council Member Bangerter suggested that we wait 30-days so staff can do some preliminary investigation. Council concurred. CLOSED SESSION a. Discussion of on-going litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 International Treasury Management/Denman Iowa Trust Mike Hudson vs City of La Quinta b. Discussion of Personnel pursuant to Government Code Section 54957 Personnel Evaluation Labor Negotiations Council recessed to Redevelopment Agency. Council recessed until 7:00 P.M. PRESENTATIONS Mayor Pena presented the April La Quinta Beautiflil Awards to the following: Residence: Antonio & Lydia Ibarra, 54-565 Ramirez Business: Beef N Brew Restaurant, 78-483 Highway 111 PUBLIC COMMENT 1. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 25499 REVISED) REQUEST FOR A SECOND ONE- YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED SUBDWISION MAP WHICH DWIDED 88.5 ACRES INTO 33 RESIDENTIAL CONDOMINIUM LOTS TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF 308 CONDOMINIUM UNITS ON PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED EASThRLY OF LAKE CAHUILLA & NORTH OF 58TH AVENUE WITHIN PGA WEST. APPLICANT: MR. ALAN R. LEVIN, SUNRISE CO. BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 12 May 18, 1993 Council Member McCartney abstained due to a conflict of interest and left the dais. Mr. Herman, Planning Director, advised that the applicant, Sunrise Co., is requesting an extension of tirne for the last phase Phase 5) of Tract 25499. The Planning Commission has recornrnended approval subject to existing conditions ALAN LEVIN, Vice President of Sunrise Co., was present to answer any questions. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. There being no one wishing to speak, the PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. RESOLUTION NO.93-43 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT 25499 REVISED), 2ND EXTENSION OF TIME TO ALLOW THE CREATION OF A CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter that Resolution No. 93-43 be approved as recommended. Motion carried with Council Member McCartney absent. 2. TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 23971 REQUEST FOR A THIRD ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR A TRACT WHICH SUBDIVIDES 70-ACRES INTO 228 SINGLE-FAMILY LOTS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF WASHINGTON STREET AND MILES AVENUE. APPLICANT: DEANE/LA QUINTA L. P. BY DEANE HOMES. Mr Herman, Planning Director, advised that the applicant, Deane Homes, is requesting the third and final extension of tirne for Tract 23971. The Planning Commission has recommended approval with modification of some of the conditions to bring them in line with current standards and requirements. STEVE ROBB INS, representing Deane Homes was present to answer any questions. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. There being no one wishing to speak, the PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 D City Council Minutes 13 May 18, 1993 RESOLUTION NO.93-44 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REVISED TENTATIVE TRACT 23971, THIRD AND FINAL EXTENSION OF TIME. CASE NO. REVISED TT 23971, EXThNSION OF TIME DEANE HOMES. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter that Resolution No.93-44 be adopted as submitted subject to all recommended conditions. Motion carried unanimously. 3. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 93-032- AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 9.32 R-1 ZONE ONE-FAMILY DWELLINGS) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE. Mr. Herman, Planning Director, advised that this matter has been before the Council previously at which time, the Council asked for modifications dealing with hoofed animals. Hoofed animal has been defined with examples. The intent of modifying the R- 1 Zone is to allow the equestrian overlay zone to be the zone which permits the largest number of animals the standard R-1 Zone limits the number of animals. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. There being no one wishing to speak, the PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. MOTION It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter to take up Ordinance No. 228 by title and number only and waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously. ORDINANCE NO.228 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER 9.32- R-1 ZONE ONE FAMILY DWELLINGS) OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE. CASE NO.: ZOA 93- 032- CITY OF LA QUINTA. It was moved by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter that Ordinance No.228 be introduced on first reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Bangerter, McCartney, Perkins, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02 DCity Council Minutes 14 May 18, 1993 STUDY SESSION 1. PRESENTATIONS BY APPLICANTS FOR INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD AND CONSWERATION OF SELECTION OF BOARD MEMBERS. Each of the following individuals proceeded to make presentations to the City Council: Jesus Arguelles interviewed earlier) Diana Brown Helen Gureath Ernest Edward Hott Tom Lewis Bruce Sales Sharon Sargent Jack Wilson Following the presentations, the Council balloted ballots are on file in the City Clerk's office MOTION It was moved by Council Members Bangerter/McCartney that Tom Lewis and Jack Wilson be appointed to the Investrnent Advisory Board for the two-year terms and that Diana Brown, Helen Gilreath and Bruce Sales be appointed for one-year terms and that the remaining applications be kept on file for three months. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.93-123. There being no hirther business, the meeting was adjourned at 7:53 P.M. upon motion by Council Members Sniff/Bangerter Re e tfully submitted AUNDRA Clerk City of La Quinta California BIB] 01-20-96-U01 01:18:01PM-U01 CCMIN051893-U02