Loading...
1992 10 20 CC MinutesL LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 20, 1992 Regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at 3:00 P.M. by Mayor Pena, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Councilmembers Rushworth, Sniff, Mayor Pena ABSENT: Councilmembers Bohnenberger, Franklin MOTION It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Rushworth that Councilmembers Bohnenberger and Franklin be excused. Motion carried unanimously. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Mr. Genovese, Interim City Manager, asked that the Study Session items be taken in reverse order and that the Fritz Burns Park Master Plan be continued to November 17th. Mayor Pena asked that Consent Items 4 & 5 be removed from the Consent Calendar and referred to staff for a report and recommendation. Ms. Honeywell, City Attorney, asked if Council wished to add the request of Landmark Land Co. to the agenda relative to a policy clarification regarding reimbursements. MOTION It was moved by Councilmember Sniff, seconded by Mayor Pena that the request of Landmark Land Co. be added to the agenda, noting that the need to take action arose after the posting of the agenda and that Consent Items 4 & 5 be pulled for further staff review and recommendation. Motion carried unanimously. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MOTION It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Rushworth that the minutes of October 5 and October 6, 1992 be approved as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. ANNOUNCEMENTS None PUBLIC COMMENT Brenda Mccarthy, 52-685 Eisenhower Dr., addressed the Council on the need for a four-way stop at Eisenhower and Nogales in order to slow down the traffic since it's one of the few east/west streets without cross-gutters. She has been asking that this intersection be made four-way since May and was told by employees that a stop sign was going be installed and she more recently learned that the BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 LCity Council Minutes 2 October 21, 1992 City Staff is going to be making a recommendation to the Council for lowering the speed limit on Eisenhower instead of making a four-way stop at Nogales, which she and many residents in the area find unacceptable. Therefore, they have started two petitions one for the four-way stop and one against. So far they have 210 signatures for the four-way stop versus 9 against. She asked for Council's support for this four-way stop. Mr. Speer, Ass't. City Engineer, advised that this matter has been reviewed by the Technical Traffic Committee and their recommendation will be presented to the Council on November 17th. Anne Marie Aguilar, 74-060 El Cortez way, Palm Desert, addressed the Council on behalf of the Palm Desert High School Cheerleaders. She advised that they have qualified to participate in the National Finals National Dance Team competition) in Florida in February, which is going to Cost $5,000. The money must be submitted in December and thus far they have raised about half of what is needed. She asked for Council's support in assisting with a sponsorship. They offered to perform in exchange for a donation. Council asked that this request be agendized for the next meeting. WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE None BUSINESS SESSION 1. CONSIDERATION OF CIVIC CENTER LANDSCAPE DESIGN BY T.K.D. ASSOCIATES. Tom Doczi, representing T.K.D. Associates presented and described a drawing of the proposed landscape design for the Civic Center. He noted that the proposed design seemed to provide the best plan for the Arts Festival and was favored by the Planning Commission and Design Review Board. In response to questions by Council, Mr. Doczi advised that the amphitheater will seat between 2,000 3,000. It has been oriented towards the north/west to alleviate the sound from going towards residential properties. The meandering sidewalks are 12' 15' in order to accommodate vehicles needed to assist in setting up for the arts festival. There are spaces for 256 exhibitors. There will be a planting strip in the middle, creating a divided path in some areas. BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 LCity Council Minutes 3 October 21, 1992 Council expressed some concern with the landscaped, divided path posing a liability problem with people stepping off. They preferred to have periodic seating along the pathway. Councilmember Sniff suggested that if date palms are used, that they be limited to the perimeter for ease in maintenance. He also asked if there are plans for phasing the project and Mr Herman advised that the final plans will be presented with a concept for three phases. NOTION It was moved by Councilmembers Rushworth/Sniff to accept the recommended Civic Center landscape design and instruct the consultant to begin detailed construction drawings. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 92- 188. 2. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR HIRING PART-TIME STAFF FOR SPORTS COMPLEX MANAGEMENT ASSISTANCE. Mr. Bohlen, Parks & Recreation Manager, advised that the Council previously approved part-time staff to assist in the management of the Sports Complex in the Spring when the YMCA asked to be released from their contract. It has worked out well and with a savings to the City. He asked for Council's authorization to recruit for two part-time employees to continue this program, which was previously budgeted only until July 1992. MOTION It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Rushworth to approve the recruitment of up to two part-time staff to assist in the supervision and management of the Sports Complex in an amount not to exceed $2,700. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 92-189. 3. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF LANDMARK LAND CO. FOR POLICY REGARDING REIMBURSEMENTS. Mayor Pena recommended that the request of Landmark be referred to staff for an appropriate recommendation. Ms. Honeywell asked if the Council wishes for staff to develop an equitable way to allocate costs when you have a developer on one portion of a site that has a benefit from a road that's being developed around it. Council concurred on staff developing such a policy. Mayor Pena asked that Mr. Abadie be notified of Council's direction. BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 LCity Council Minutes 4 October 21, 1992 CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED OCTOBER 20, 1992. 2. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE LISTING OF THE PENINSULAR BIG HORN SHEEP AS AN ENDANGERED SPECIES. 3. AUTHORIZATION TO COLLECT PRINCIPLE ON CERTIFICATE OF DEPOSIT SECURING LABOR PAYMENT W. D. YOUNG & SONS, INC. 4. REMOVED. 5. REMOVED. MOTION It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Rushworth to approve the Consent Calendar as recommended and as amended with Item No. 2 being approved by RESOLUTION NO. 92-82. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 92-190. STUDY SESSION 1. DISCUSSION OF CIVIC CENTER PLAQUE. Mr. Reynolds advised that it's customary with a public building to have a dedication plaque. The contractor has submitted to the Architect, the proposed plaque to be placed at the entrance to the Council Chambers. Generally, these plaques contain the names of the City Council, City Manager, Architect and in some cases the contractor and construction manager. In response to Councilmember Sniff, Mr. Reynolds advised that it doesn't take long to produce the plaque the only sense of urgency is for this Council to express its opinion. Councilmember Sniff suggested that this matter be continued to November 17th when there's a full Council present. Councilmember Rushworth wished to know how other cities handle their dedication plaques to see what the pattern is. Council concurred on continuing this matter to November 17th. 2. REVIEW OF FRITZ BURNS PARK PRELIMINARY MASTER PLAN. Continued to November 17, 1992. BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 LCity Council Minutes 5 October 21, 1992 3. REVIEW OF FIRST DRAFT PARKS AND RECREATION MASTER PLAN. Mr. Bohien, Parks & Recreation Manager, advised that this proposed Master Plan is the result of an extensive public hearing process where the Commission conducted two public forums and produced a parks and recreation survey over 1000 respondents) The public opinion was used as a foundation for the document, especially in the Analysis of Demand, the Standards and Definitions, and Action Plan sections of the Master Plan. In the planning process, the City was divided into four planning areas for master planning purposes. A population analysis was conducted in which they analyzed where the City has been, where it's going, what it looks like in terms of growth, age groups and which age groups are growing in greater proportion to others, the cultural composition and some general household demographics. An analysis of supply was conducted looking at existing park acreage and the deficiencies of park acreage based on current population. Mayor Pena commented that he would have liked to have seen how the inclusion of Lake Cahuilla would have changed the analysis under the comparative park acreage and standards. Mr. Bohien pointed out that the figures presented from other communities only include neighborhood and community parks regional parks were not included in the figures. He added, however, that the Bear Creek Bikepath will be included on recommendation of the Community Services Commission. Under existing facilities, Mayor Pena suggested looking at landscaping of perimeter walls to cut down on graffiti and maintenance involved to remove the graffiti. He then reviewed the inventory of existing recreation programs and noted that there has been some discussion lately that there has been an apparent lack of recreation programs offered in the City and that there may be some conflicts. However, the analysis didn't show many conflicts and there appears to be some very substantial programs being offered in the City. The key problem may be in the marketing of the programs. He believed that the Recreation Federation may be looking at this issue. All of the agencies providing programs appear to be using the school to send material home with the children to advertise their programs. Mr. Bohlen then reviewed the analysis of demand in which the survey showed that a multi-purpose recreation facility was the number one choice by the respondents. This facility would BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 LCity Council Minutes 6 October 21, 1992 possibly include a weight room, gymnasium, aerobics room, games room, etc. Regarding the types of parks favored, neighborhood parks ranked first. Regarding priority of construction, the respondents would like to see the Fritz Burns Park completed first, then the Community Park North, Bear Creek Channel Trail Stop and then improvements to the Sports Complex. Regarding method of paying for the facilities, everyone would like to see developers pay for parks along with corporate sponsorships, followed by the more traditional methods of financing, 1. e., assessments districts. A pool at Fritz Burns Park was the foremost comment and a desire for more bikepaths and a teen center. A skate park was also mentioned many times. He commented on the liability problem with skate parks, but the City could dedicate some land to a contractor to operate such a park. Councilmember Sniff asked for clarification that the least desirable form of funding facilities is through assessment districts and Mr. Bohlen advised that's correct. Mayor Pena felt that assessment districts can provide some long-term, stable financing for recreational programs, but would hope that the policy of this Council would be to put such an issue to a vote of the people and let them decide. Mr. Bohlen advised that there are three options for Council to consider in the future: 1. Accept the report and use it as a reference tool; or 2. Accept the report and it would then become a planning document; or 3. Adopt the report by ordinance, which would mandate the standards included. Mr. Bohlen concluded in saying that staff is interested in getting the Council's support for the report and direction to submit it to public agencies and individuals for comment. He advised that the comments could be returned to the Council in about three weeks. Mayor Pena complemented Mr. Bohlen on an excellent report. Councilmember Sniff also recognized the efforts of the Community Services Commission. Council concurred on authorizing transmittal of the draft Parks and Recreation Master Plan to public agencies and individuals. BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 LCity Council Minutes 7 October 21, 1992 DEPARTMENT REPORTS Mr. Reynolds, Public Works Director, advised that construction of Tampico will begin in about two weeks. There will be disruption, but one lane of traffic will be open at all times. The Contract is a 120-day contract. In response to Mayor Pena, Mr. Reynolds advised that he is trying to get the light at Avenue 52 and Washington moved to Tampico and Washington. He added that they are pursuing an aggressive signage program. He also noted that there will be a problem in front of the Post Office for a day or two, as there's a sanitary sewer that will run from Tampico to Cadiz down Bermudas. Council suggested the possibility of doing the work in front of the Post Office on week-ends. Council recessed to the Financing Authority meeting and the Redevelopment Agency meeting. Recessed until 7:00 P.M. PRESENTATIONS Mayor announced that the winner of the September La Quinta Beautiful Award Landscaped for Ecology" was Jim & Ronalee Smith, 51-300 Avenida Diaz. PUBLIC COMMENT None PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION ASSESSING LIEN AND PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION ON TAX ROLLS ON CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. a. Leona McKenzie APN 617-381-032 $187.50 b. Capitol Cont. Corp. APN 617-381-003 $187.50 c. Michael/Annie Fischer APN 617-381-015 & $187.50 APN 617-381-016 $187.50 d. Maria Adorador APN 617-381-033 $187.50 e. M. M. Miller APN 617-383-004 $187.50 f. Dorothy Sweet APN 617-382-037 $187.50 g. Marquette Healy APN 773-173-007 $187.50 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 LCity Council Minutes 6 October 21, 1992 h. San Fernando Swap Meet APN 774-075-008 & $187.50 APN 774-073-002 $187.50 i. LaFern Ervin APN 774-072-013 $187.50 j. Richard/Bernice Hagerty APN 773-275-021 $187.50 k. James McPhee APN 773-251-002 $187.50 1. William Barnett APN 769-062-004 $187.50 m. M. M. Miller APN 617-383-014 $187.50 n. Thomas/Suzanne Yaru APN 617-383-006 $187.50 Mr. Hartung, Building and Safety Director, recommended that the resolution submitted be adopted placing a lien on the subject parcels for abatement costs, with the exception of William Barnett, who has paid his assessment. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. There being no one wishing to speak, the HEARING WAS CLOSED. RESOLUTION NO. 92-83 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, ASSESSING LIEN AND PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION ON TAX ROLLS ON CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Rushworth that Resolution No. 92-83 be adopted as amended. Motion carried unanimously. 2. TENTATIVE TRACT 24890 APPROVAL OF SECOND ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT WHICH DIVIDES 404 + ACRES INTO 392 + LOTS IN AREA BOUNDED BY 52ND AVENUE ON THE SOUTH, JEFFERSON ST. ON THE EAST & CALLE RONDO ON THE WEST. APPLICANT: J.M. PETERS CO. Mr. Sawa, Principal Planner presented staff report advising that the Planning Commission has recommended approval with Condition No. 42 being amended as recommended by the Engineering Department pertaining to tract-wide improvements. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. Bob Trap, representing J. M. Peters Co. was present to answer any questions. There being no one else wishing to speak, the hearing was CLOSED. BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 LCity Council Minutes 9 October 21, 1992 RESOLUTION NO. 92-84 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS AND GRANTING APPROVAL OF SECOND YEAR ONE-TIME EXTENSION FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 24890 TO CREATE A 392 RESIDENTIAL LOT SUBDIVISION ON APPROXIMATELY 404 ACRE SITE. CASE NO. TT 24890, SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME J. N. PETERS COMPANY. It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Rushworth that Resolution No. 92-84 be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. 3. CONSIDERATION OF NEGATIVE DECLARATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EA 92-240), CHANGE OF ZONE 92-072 & TENTATIVE TRACT 27613 FOR CHANGE OF ZONE FOR 446 ACRES FROM R-1*++10,000 AND r-2*20,000 TO R?2 MULTIPLE FAMILY) AND 19.4 ACRES FROM H-C HILLSIDE CONSERVATION) TO R-2, TO ALLOW SUBDIVISION ON 746+ ACRES FOR 399 RESIDENTIAL UNITS, 18-HOLE GOLF COURSE AND TENNIS COMPLEX ON PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF 52ND AVE., EAST OF AVENIDA HERMUDAS, AND NORTH OF CORAL REEF MOUNTAINS. APPLICANT: J. BURTON GOLD. MOTION It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Rushworth that the applications of J. Burton Gold be continued to December 15, 1992 at the applicant's request. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 92-191. 4. SPECIFIC PLAN 89-014, AMENDMENT #1, APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO SPECIFIC PLAN TO ALLOW DRIVE-THROUGH FAST FOOD FACILITIES WITHIN 111 LA QUINTA CENTER LOCATED IN AREA BOUNDED BY HIGHWAY 111, WASHINGTON ST., WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL AND ADAMS ST. APPLICANT: TRANSPACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CO. 111 LA QUINTA CENTER). Mr. Sawa, Principal Planner, presented staff report advising that Specific Plan 89-014 was approved by the Council in April 1990. At that time, the applicant was proposing five drive- through restaurants; however, a condition was imposed prohibiting any drive-through facilities except for medical uses. The concern centered around the fact that the South Coast Air Quality Management District was discussing elimination of drive-through facilities due to air pollution concerns. The applicant is now requesting approval of an amendment to permit a maximum of three drive-through fast food facilities within the site. The applicant has indicated that all drive- through facilities shall be screened by a combination of BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 LCity Council Minutes 10 October 21, 1992 berms, walls and landscaping so that cars using the drive- through facilities will be not be visible by pedestrians on the perimeter sidewalks in a manner satisfactory to the Planning Director. Additionally, the applicant indicates that conditional use permit applications shall be processed for each drive-through facility as they are proposed. The Planning Commission has recommended approval with a condition that each drive-through must have two pick-up windows, which is a mitigation measure the SQAMD is recommending in their draft handbook. Mr. Sawa noted that the Council has received a study from the applicant labeled CRA Study on Drive-Through Service Lanes, which concludes that air pollution created by drive-throughs is actually less than if a car stops, parks and re-starts. Councilmember Rushworth felt that may be a moot point, given the information being received from the SQAMD stating that in five years, there will be no internal combustible engines because none of the gasoline engines will be able to meet the standards Tom Childers, representing Washington/Adams Partnership, 46- 100 1/2 Washington St., first noted that at the present time, there are no proposals for a bank with a drive-through. He briefly reviewed the history of this issue noting that when the original approvals were made, the Planning Commission had recommended approval of drive-throughs, but the Council denied them. In constructing and marketing the center, they have found that the sale of parcels is extremely important to their ability to move forward. There is still no real construction financing available for commercial projects and this project has been going forward through a combination of developer equity and sale of pads. All fast-food restaurants feel they have far greater sales when they have a drive-through. He then commented on the statistics showing that air pollution from drive-throughs is actually diminishing. He also commented on the importance of the aesthetics of drive- throughs and proceeded to explain their landscaping plan, which is intended to provide maximum screening. The Mayor declared the PUBLIC HEARING OPEN. There being no one else wishing to speak, the HEARING WAS CLOSED. Councilmember Rushworth believed that the architecture and landscaping is far more important than the air quality conditions, because he believes that issue will solve itself with other regulations. Therefore, we need to strive for something that will fit our standards of excellence in architecture and landscaping. He supported the request. BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 LCity Council Minutes 11 October 21, 1992 Mayor Pena stated that he was still fundamentally opposed to drive-throughs, whether it's air pollution or otherwise. He believed that the tone was set when the General Plan was adopted and was discussed at length during the public hearing process for this project. He noted that we will have a high school located close to this facility and it will turn into a drive-through for a lot of teenagers in the area and he didn't feel that is the kind of image we're looking for along Highway 111. Councilmember Sniff felt that we need to work with and accommodate businesses wherever possible. But, we also need to make sure that everything that is built is creative and visually acceptable. He had no problem with the request, provided that all the requirements regarding berming and landscaping are well-done so that we don't see a large accumulation of waiting cars. RESOLUTION NO. 92-85 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO A COMMERCIAL SPECIFIC PLAN. CASE NO. SPECIFIC PLAN 89-014, AMENDMENT #1. It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Rushworth that Resolution No. 92-85 be adopted. Motion carried with Mayor Pena voting NO. 5. ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 92-026, AMENDING TITLE 9 PLANNING AND ZONING) OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCLUDE CHAPTER 9.162, RELATING TO TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS AND CONFIRMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. Mr. Nesbitt, Principal Planner, advised that this matter was continued from the October 6th meeting for some additional information relative to Prop. 111 Funds. He advised that the City has been receiving these funds over the past three fiscal years in which we've collected $108,907.52. He noted that we may not be able to use these funds, because the regulations require you to spend an average of prior three fiscal years for specific highway and street improvements, so we would have to spend $400,000 to get $60,000+. There are no significant costs involved with the implementation of this program, as South Coast will be doing most of the monitoring. MOTION It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Rushworth to take up Ordinance No. 217 by title and numoer only and waive further reading. Motion carried unanimously. BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 L City Council Minutes 12 October 21, 1992 ORDINANCE NO. 217 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR SPECIFIC NEW DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AND CHANGES OF USES. It was moved by Councilmembers Sniff/Rushworth that Ordinance No. 217 be introduced on first reading. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Rushworth, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: Councilmembers Bohnenberger, Franklin There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned. Re>ectfujY submitted, RA<HOLlwCity Clerk City of La Quinta, California BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02 BIB] 01-30-96-U01 08:35:40AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 10-U02 20-U02 1992-U02