1988 09 20 CC Minutes!l LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 20, 1988
Regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at
the hour of 7:30 P.M., Mayor Hoyle presiding, followed by the Pledge
of Allegiance.
PRESENT: Council Members Bohnenberger, Cox, Pena, Sniff, Mayor
Hoyle
ABSENT: None
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
MAYOR HOYLE asked that Item No. 5 be removed from the Consent
Calendar and considered after the second public hearing.
PUBLIC COMMENT
There were no public comments.
COMMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
There were no comments by Council Members.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENT #1 TO SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 83-002 PGA
WEST HOTEL TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF HOTEL ROOMS FROM 650 TO
1,000 AND TO INCREASE THE HOTEL HEIGHT FROM FOUR STORIES TO SIX
STORIES APPLICANT: LANDMARK LAND COMPANY, INC.
Mayor Hoyle advised that he would be abstaining from this issue
as his wife is employed by Landmark Land Company, Inc.
BIB]
02-23-96-U01
04:20:08PM-U01
CCMIN-U02
09-U02
20-U02
1988-U02
!lCity Council Minutes page 2 September 20, 1988
Mr. Jerry Herman, principal Planner, presented staff's report,
first giving some background information on PGA West advising
that the approved project, consisting of 1,665 acres, included
5,000 residential units, 20 acres of commercial, a major
recreational center, and a 65 acre resort village containing 400
hotel rooms, 250 apartments/condominiums or hotel rooms,
ancillary hotel uses and retail shops. That approval allowed for
the 250 apartments/condominiums being a part of the hotel to make
650 approved hotel rooms. On May 1, 1984, the City Council
adopted Resolution No. 64-28 certifying the EIR, which included
the adoption of Statements of Overriding Considerations" and
Findings and Statements of Fact".
The amendment proposes an increase in the hotel from 650 rooms to
1,000 rooms and from four stories to six. A supplemental EIR
which focused on traffic circulation was prepared and
circulated.
Mr. Herman pointed out illustrations posted showing sight
distances; and a USGS Map which identified the mountains as it
relates to the hotel. He noted that the change to six stories
adds 28' to the structure.
He added that public notices went to all property owners within
300' of the exterior of the PGA West project and within PGA West
and those property owners within 1/2 of the PGA West boundaries
and published in the paper.
The concerns that have been expressed relates to traffic; noise;
height; visibility; aesthetics and number of rooms and time of
hearing. He believed that these issues have been adequately
addressed in the EIR.
FORREST HAAG, P.O. Box 1000, La Quinta, addressed the Council as
Vice president of Landmark Land Co. stating that they have tried
to bring about a land use plan through the development of four
championship golf courses and the adjacent residential and
commercial uses that would focus that commercial use within the
resort core. By doing so, they are going to demonstrate that
traffic volumes typically projected can be softened into a more
pedestrian resort village. The traffic study that was developed
for the additional rooms at PGA West looked at the original
approval and the addition, and the aggregate impact that was
assessed has been addressed in the conditions of approval that
are being recommended by staff. Because of the amenities at this
resort, a guest will not be as inclined to leave to visit other
recreational facilities which would necessitate using Highway
111. They believe that the success of their resort is going to
depend on good traffic and pedestrian circulation. PGA West
today, with the 500 units that are built and the land consumed in
golf/open space or residential development is not demonstrating
anywhere near the densities that are approved for the 5,000 units
in the original approval. If the land use pattern continues at
the present rate of absorption in net density, they would never
attain the 5,000 units that are today, approved.
BIB]
02-23-96-U01
04:20:08PM-U01
CCMIN-U02
09-U02
20-U02
1988-U02
!lCity Council Minutes Page 3 September 20, 1988
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Pena, Mr. Haag advised that in
looking at the number of acres that have been utilized, the
number of units that have been built, and assuming that land use
patterns and the market place will stay the same, they will
probably absorb 3/5 of the approval, or in excess of 3,000+
units.
Mr. Haag then addressed the issue of viewshed" stating that the
hotel was centered in the middle of the project and insulated the
perimeter from the viewshed impact. The closest view may be in
excess of a 1/4 mile and some of those views is a distance into
the project, that if you can see the building, the difference in
a 4 to 6 floor building is infinitesimal by the time it's
projected to the mountain. He referred to a USGS map depicting
elevation changes.
Council Member Bohnenberger questioned how close the closest
living unit will be to the hotel and Mr. Haag advised that it
would be about 600' to the north. About five of the dwelling
units would have a primary view angle of the hotel.
Council Member Cox noted, however, that the people who purchased
those five units knew that a hotel was going in and Mr. Haig
stated that is correct, they knew a four story hotel was going in.
Council Member Sniff went back to May 1, 1984 to get an
historical perspective on this project. At that time, he
proposed a vote of the people on this project. After the public
hearing, the people began a referendum effort with particular
regard to the closure of Jefferson Street. Mr. Wolff, who was a
Council Member and a member of the Referendum Committee chose to
make a separate agreement with Mr. Ernie Vossler, representative
of Landmark Land Co. This effectively ended the referendum
effort.
On May 15, 1984, the Press Enterprise reported on the deal" that
was struck in which Landmark Land Co. agreed to contribute
$1,000,000 for special community service projects/facilities, to
be made in $200,000 annual installment payments beginning January
1, 1985. This agreement limited PGA residential heights to two
stories and the hotel to four. It also committed Landmark to
assist with the downtown core and called for disbandment of the
Referendum Committee. He added that he supported the agreement
with reluctance. He asked Mr. Haag for his response on these
comments.
Mr. Haag stated that it is his understanding of the memorandum of
agreement that it was a two party agreement bounding Landmark
Land Co. and the Committee to several things and even the City of
La Quinta. In concept, he felt that if the Referendum Committee
had ceased to harass Landmark as point 1 stated, they might be
able to think there's some relevance to that document. Landmark
was heavily pursued with relative to other commercial and
beneficial development within the City; pursued heavily against
those approvals by the same group and one of the points of
discontinuing it's efforts against Landmark could be questioned
immediately. Without being specific, generally, the promises as
to where the money was going in analysis, could be an interesting
BIB]
02-23-96-U01
04:20:08PM-U01
CCMIN-U02
09-U02
20-U02
1988-U02
!lCity Council Minutes Page 4 September 20, 1988
study. Therefore, the spirit of that document could be in
question
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Pena regarding extension of Madison
Street, Mr. Haag advised that in the original approval of PGA
West, Condition 19 addressed the extension of Madison. His
recollection is that the City Manager and Planning Director at
that time, in their pursuit of mitigation of adequate traffic
concerns, projected that there was some need to connect Madison
Street between this project and points north. If it is
determined that traffic counts going north on Madison require
participation in improvement, then that would be adequately
assessed and levied against the developer. He added that he was
party to the approval process of Rancho La Quinta, which is south
of Avenue 58 in unincorporated area) in which their traffic
analysis considered the cummulative effect of that project, PGA
West and others. It was felt that the arterials that exists
running north on Jackson and Monroe would adequately carry those
loads north. The need for Madison Street improvement was not
triggered by the ultimate development of that project.
The Mayor Pro Tern declared the public hearing OPEN.
At this time, the City Clerk read the following letters into the
record:
IN SUPPORT OF PROJECT:
David Agnew, Bruce Cathcart, Robert Cunard, Gordon David,
Firstworld Travel, James Gilstrap, Bernardo Gouthier, Green Thurnb
Gardening, Christopher Haenel, Alex Jacoy, John Kwake, La Quinta
Builders Supply, La Quinta Chamber of Commerce, Paul Lewis,
Mackenzie & Assoc., Magic Maintenance, Robert Monroe, Eddy
Nicholson, Fred Rice Productions, Inc., John Mugni, Ranch of the
Seventh Range, U. S. National Senior Open Golf Assoc., Morgan
Ward, Jr., Lucia Moran, Sterling Mount, Jay Colliatie, Mike Gray,
Jack Stewart, Frank Kawabe, Mimi Smith, Bill Slifer, J. H.
Mickey" Munley, Frank Pierson, George Richards, Don Eden, Steve
Walser, George Jones, Elliott Robinson, Joe Walser, Jr., Beef and
Brew.
IN OPPOSITION Ta PROJECT:
J. Willison Allen, John & Eileen Bobbitt, Robert Dickey, Mr. &
Mrs. M. W. Giboney, Jerome & Sandra Cabakoff, John Iberti, Bob
James, Robert & Lila Kommerstad, Ronald Nolte, Stanley Ross,
Leland & Julie Scheu, Ronald Junkin, William Walter, Mr. & Mrs.
James Young.
BIB]
02-23-96-U01
04:20:08PM-U01
CCMIN-U02
09-U02
20-U02
1988-U02
!lCity Council Minutes Page 5 September 20, 1988
LETTERS EXPRESSING CONCERN:
Stanford Sanoff, Dietrich Werner, Imperial Irrigation District.
GEORGE JONES, 54-180 Oaktree, stated that he supports the
project, he felt that aesthetically, it's a well designed
building. He noted that PGA West property values have gone up
and commented that this project has become a world-known project.
ALLAN LEVIN, 75-005 Country Club Dr., Vice President of Sunrise
Co., representing William Bone who owns two lots at 55-305 Pebble
Beach and 55-355 Pebble Beach and Mr. Jack Conlon, who resides at
55-700 Pinehurst. On behalf of individuals and the Company, as
master builder of PGA West, they support Landmark's proposal for
the hotel and the various changes they've proposed. They feel it
will enhance the overall resort concept as it was initially
envisioned. They have no doubts about the quality that will be
put into the project.
In answer to Council Member Bohnenberger, Mr. Levin advised that
they currently have 800 units either completed or under
construction. About 25% of the developable land is planned for
residential.
MORGAN WARD, JR., 48-800 San Pedro, spoke in favor of the
project. The aesthetics of the changes will not detract from our
natural beauty. He also commented on the economic benefit to the
City.
DAN SMITH, 55-130 Shoal Creek, stated that in reviewing the
plans, he believes the aesthetics to be good and noted that the
project will bring in additional revenue to the City. Landmark
has done a good job in all they've done and the project is known
world-wide.
J. C. Bryan, P.O. Box 1597, Ranch of the Seventh Range, stated
that he supports the project 100%. Landmark has done a good job
and has improved the area tremendously.
MARK MORAN, P.O. Box 1305, President of La Quinta Chamber of
Commerce, recalled when the City didn't have adequate roads,
improvements in the cove, water, flood control, law enforcement,
etc. The only way a City can run is to generate revenue. He
spoke in favor of the project commenting on the revenue it will
generate.
BRUNO PURVENAS, 54-353 Vallejo, advised that he was the head
tennis pro at the La Quinta Hotel during the 50's. He felt that
the City is fortunate to have a company like Landmark Land Co. in
the City. Guests will be able to come to this resort and stay
with all the amenities planned.
BIB]
02-23-96-U01
04:20:08PM-U01
CCMIN-U02
09-U02
20-U02
1988-U02
!lCity Council Minutes Page 6 September 20, 1988
MARION ELLSON, 80-082 Palm Circle, stated that she knows that
traffic will increase on Jefferson Street, but felt that the
hotel is not going to have as great an impact on Jefferson as
other future projects might. The project can be a great attribute
to the community in many ways that have already been stated. She
felt that the over-riding consideration is the economic benefit
to the community. None of the resorts in the Coachella valley
offer what PGA West offers.
MATT MORRIS, 80-650 Avenue 50, advised that he is planning to buy
a home in La Quinta in the near future. He expressed concern
about traffic to Highway 111 and to Interstate 10. He was
especially concerned about the widening of Jefferson through
Indian Springs. He was also concerned about the timing of the
hearing. Until these concerns are adequately addressed, he asked
that the decision be carried over.
JOHN MUGNI, 80-556 Avenue 58, advised that he was also speaking
for Bernardo Gouthier, 57-325 Madison. He advised that there are
currently 2,203 homes in La Quinta and 5,388 vacant lots. He
therefore, felt that area growth is vital to the development of
La Quinta vacant lots. During the Skins Games, which had an
attendance of 13,000, they found that traffic was handled very
orderly and moved efficiently. Regarding water, he contacted
Coachella valley Water District who assured him that the effect
on the water would be minimal. They feel that this project will
blend in with the landscape well. Any delay would not serve the
City and its economy. He is proud of this area and supported the
Project.
BOB GINGRICH, representing Jim MacKenzie, 50-085 Calle Rosarita,
read Mr. MacKenzie's letter of September 15th speaking in favor
of the project citing increased business through tourist and
conventioneers, higher land and property values plus a much
stronger economic base for the community.
HOWARD NELSON, 54-900 Avenida Diaz, hoped that proper weight will
be given to the economic value this project has to the City of La
Quinta. La Quinta has a fantastic potential, but it needs an
economic base. He urged approval of the project.
BOB MONROE, 48-750 El Nido, stated that as a neighboring property
owner he supports the project wholeheartedly. He didn't believe
there's going to be a visual impact.
LARRY ALLEN, P.O. Box 412, La Quinta, stated that this project
will add more income to the City and will put the City in a
competitive arena with other areas for conventions. He felt that
Jefferson Street must be four lanes from Highway 111 to PGA West
when the hotel is finished. He strongly urged approval of the
hotel expansion.
JACQUES ABELS, P.O. Box 1416, felt that this is a wonderful
project for La Quinta and will add revenue to the City. He
strongly urged approval.
BIB]
02-23-96-U01
04:20:08PM-U01
CCMIN-U02
09-U02
20-U02
1988-U02
!lCity Council Minutes Page 7 September 20, 1988
ALEX JACOY, 50-950 Madison, General Manager of El Dorado Polo
Club, stated that they host several major events throughout the
year and they bring in a lot of notoriety. Last year, during the
U.S. Open, they used La Quinta Hotel as the host hotel. They
feel their people who come to the polo club wants to use hotels
on this end of the valley. He urged approval.
JAMES GILSTRAP, 55-500 Oak Tree, stated that he lives about 400
yards from the proposed hotel and feels that it will benefit him
as a property owner. He urged approval.
ROBIN GROAT, Anderson Travel Service, and Vice President of La
Quinta Chamber of Commerce urged approval of the expansion
speaking of the benefits to the City.
PEARL KNIGHT, 78-0?5 Avenida La Fonda, spoke in favor of the
expansion commenting on the increase in her business with every
new project in La Quinta. Twenty five percent of the patients
are referrals from Landmark.
There being no one else wishing to speak, the hearing was CLOSED.
COUNCIL COMMENT
In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Herman advised that
Statement of Overriding Considerations are environmental
conditions that cannot be mitigated to a sufficient level, so
there has to be justification to override those environmental
concerns. The Planning Department concluded that the only
significant environmental impact was the closure of Jefferson
Street. Other traffic concerns; air quality and water were not
significant impacts. This project should not impact the village,
as the commercial within PGA West is being intended to serve the
residents and guests of the development. Regarding the streets,
the conditions require the preparation of a traffic study after
one year after the hotel has been completed. This analysis will
address the intersections and streets previously addressed in the
original EIR and it will assign the development's share of those
costs of improvements.
Mr. Reynolds, Public Works Director, added that the reason for
the delay in preparing the traffic analysis is because even after
the hotel is open, there will still be a great deal of
residential development not yet completed within PGA West. One
year after the hotel is open, there will be enough residential
completed so that we can get a good handle on what is happening
to Jefferson and the intersections. He didn't feel that the City
will have a problem before we have a solution to it. The other
factor is the other developments planned along Jefferson, i.e.,
Oak Tree and The Grove which will impact and will have to share
in the cost of the improvements. The intersection of Jefferson
and Highway 111 will have to be addressed by Caltrans and City of
Indio also. Regarding signalization of Avenue 54 and Jefferson,
the money will be fronted by PGA West and we will then exact from
future development, monies to reimburse Landmark, similar to the
agreement the City entered into with La Quinta Golf Estates.
BIB]
02-23-96-U01
04:20:08PM-U01
CCMIN-U02
09-U02
20-U02
1988-U02
!lCity Council Minutes Page 8 September 20, 1988
In response to Mayor Pro Tern Pena, Mr. Reynolds advised that the
four links in which the project will cause a level of service
change are Highway 111, Avenues 50, 52 and 54 Madison Street
will not be affected. Mr. Forrest Haig advised that the hotel is
going to be built in one phase. They are planning a soft opening
in 1992 and a grand opening January 1993. Construction will
begin July 1990. Landmark Hotels will be the master developer.
Regarding Mr. Bob James' letter, Mr. Herman advised that the City
exceeded notice requirements; 10 of 500 letters were returned;
they were sent first-class mail; the General Plan policies
encourage the development of hotels; Coachella valley Water
District has submitted a letter stating that water is available
and that they will provide water and sewer to the development.
Council Member Bohnenberger, as Chief Deputy Engineer of CVWD
stated that there is more than adequate supply of water available
for irrigation and more than adequate supply of water available
from the ground water basin for domestic purposes.
In answer to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Herman advised that a
licensed engineer will have to determine compaction requirements
and seismic safety.
Council Member Sniff advised that he has mixed feelings about
this project, but his dealings with Landmark Land Co. has been
honorable. We need first class hotels in the City it's
important to our economy. He would prefer to see the hotel 4
stories, but understands that situations change, and marketing is
important. In supporting the City's best interest, he will
support the expansion.
Council Member Bohnenberger stated that PGA West made possible
our flood control project and other benefits we're yet to derive
from the Redevelopment Agency such as the improvements of our
streets, i.e., curb, gutter and replacing our infrastructure.
The hotel is one step further along in our progress. We're
looking at between one and two million dollars a year in bed tax;
an additional one million a year to our Redevelopment Agency
which can be used for further projects to improve our community
and he believed that it will be the key to stimulate business in
the village and along Highway ill. He believed that the
conditions of approval provide that concerns are taken care of
before they become major problems. He strongly supported the
project.
Council Member Cox, stated that the line of sight diagrams
indicate that we are talking about minimal impact. She preferred
to see them go up than out because that takes up green space.
This project will provide clean revenue" and will be a class act.
Mayor Pro Tern Pena commented that our hands are tied as to how we
can raise money and we need money to fund our future. Obviously,
this isn't the only source of revenue, but it gives a great base
to build on. The guests who use the hotel do not create a need
for services. He hoped that they will proceed as quickly as
possible.
BIB]
02-23-96-U01
04:20:08PM-U01
CCMIN-U02
09-U02
20-U02
1988-U02
!lCity Council Minutes Page 9 September 20, 1988
RESOLUTION NO. 88-110
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, CERTIFYING THAT THE SUPPLEMENTAL FOCUSED EIR PREPARED
FOR PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 83-002, AMENDMENT NO. 1, IS
RECOGNIZED AS ADEQUATE AND COMPLETE PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN NO.
83-002, AMENDMENT NO. 1 LANDMARK LAND COMPANY, INC.
It was moved by Council Member Bohnenberger, seconded by Council
Member Sniff that Resolution No. 88-110 be adopted. Motion
carried by the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Cox, Sniff, Mayor Pro Tern
Pena
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Mayor Hoyle
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION NO. 88-111
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, ANNOUNCING FINDINGS, AND APPROVING SPECIFIC PLAN
83-002, AMENDMENT NO. 1 PGA WEST SPECIFIC PLAN 83-002,
AMENDMENT NO. 1: LANDMARK LAND COMPANY, INC.
It was moved by Council Member Sniff, seconded by Council Member
Bohnenberger that Resolution No. 88-111 be adopted. Passed by
the following vote:
AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Cox, Sniff, Mayor Pro Tem
Pena
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Mayor Hoyle
ABSENT: None
At 9:55 P.M., the meeting was adjourned to 7:30 P.M. on Monday,
September 26th for completion of the agenda due to a power outage.
Re?ectfully subr?ted,
S??UNDRA L JUH City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
BIB]
02-23-96-U01
04:20:08PM-U01
CCMIN-U02
09-U02
20-U02
1988-U02