Loading...
1984 08 07 CC Minutes$ I I N U T E S CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LA QUINTA A regular rneeting of the City Council held at City Hail, 78-?O5 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California. August 7, 1984 7:30 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER Mayor Allen called the La Quinta City Council rrieeting to order at 7:34 A. The flag salute was led by Community Development Director Stevens. 2. ROLL CALL Present: Council Members Baier, Henderson, Wolff and Mayor Allen. Absent: Council Member Cox. Also Present: City Manager Usher, Administrative Services Coordinator Jennings, City Attorney Longtin, Community Development Director Stevens and Community safety Coordinator Brown. Moved by Council Member Wolff, seconded by Council Member Henderson, to excuse Council Member Cox. Unanimously adopted. 3. PUBLIC CO??ENT The Mayor announced that this was the time set aside for citizens to address the Council on matters relating to City business, and reminded those present that a three minute time limit would be enforced. Comment was heard from the following persons: A. James Forrest, 48-721 San Lucas Street, La Quinta, expressed concern regarding a proposal by the La Quinta Golf Estates to gate and fence areas of the Golf Estates, and asked the Council to deny a City permit for temporary fencing of this area, and further urged the Council to consider median planting on Eisenhower Drive. Council Member Wolff questioned Mr. Forrest regarding a vote taken regarding this issue by the La Quinta Golf Estates Association membership. Mr. Forrest explained that a vote was taken several years ago, in the Spring of 1982, and which time an amendment was adopted which divided the Association into several Sections for making capital improvements, which subsequently allowed only the affected lots to vote on an issue such as the present issue. Mr. Forrest further explained that the Association is in the process of taking a vote on this issue, which will take 60% within each affected group. B. Arlene Turi, P.O. Box 1094, La Quinta, echoed Mr. Forrest's objections to the proposed gating and fencing in La Quinta Golf Estates, citing such problems as dividing the community, creating an eyesore, and depreciating real estate in the area. Mg. Turi also objected to the gating of Avenida Fernando. C. Ed O'Connell, 78-047 San Timoteo, La Quinta, a resident of La Quinta Golf Estates, commented on Mr. Forrest's letter and explained the CC & R's which permit construction of the proposed gating and fencing. Mr. O'Connell explained that the vote taken resulted in 70 favorable votes and 10 opposing votes of the groups which have official permission to vote on this issue. Mr. O'Connell further explained that the proposed chain-link fencing would be planted with oleanders to screen the fencing, and that the fencing would be temporary until funds could be raised until a permanent fence could be constructed. Mr. O'Connell cited problems in this area with crime, and lack of security. BIB] 03-14-96-U01 10:24:35AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 08-U02 07-U02 1984-U02 $MI?UTFS City Council Augdst 7, 1984 Page Two. D. Jim Anathan, 48-801 San Pedro, La Quinta, a 14-year resident of La Quinta, expressed support for the proposed fencing and gating, and cites problems with crime and lack of security. Mr. Anathan cited examples of Vallev real estate which is fenced with chain-link and screened with oleanders, such a? the Walter Annenberg estate, to clarify the fact that he felt the fencing would not be a detriment to surrounding homes and real estate values. B. George Collins, a resident of La Quinta Golf Estates in 1966, expressed concern regarding Council intervention in the matter due to the Subject area being private streets and private property. He explained that the CC & R's do state, specifically, that any group of residents may get together to place a security systern providing that 60% of the residents are in favor of the issue. He reminded that the project was being done at no expense to the City, with all funds raised by local residents of the area F. Barry Chilsen, 48-805 El Nido, a member of the La Quinta Golf Estates, expressed support for the proposed project, and felt that what is proposed is fair and equitable, and stated that he felt the temporary chain-link fencing with landscaping would not be unsightly. He further stated that residents r. area had raised approximately $30,000 for street repair. G. Bill Camm, 49-847 Coachella Drive, La Quinta, President of one of the homeowner's associations in the gated area and Chairman of another association whict represent 141 persons in that area. Mr. Camm expressed support for the gating and fencing, and cited a 95% vote in his area supporting the project. H. Ray Barker, 51-046 Avenida Ramirez, La Quir?ta, expressed objection to the existing chain-link fencing surrounding the La Quinta Hotel Golf Course, which he felt was an eyesore. Mr. Barker stated that before the City acts on forcing property owners to clean their property, it should see that the chain-link fencing is maintained. H. Norma Fausel, Avenida Fernando, La Quinta, a 10-year resident, asked the Administrative Services Coordinator if a letter regarding the fencing and gating had been included in the Council packet, and requested that the Fausel Farms letter be read. Ms. Jennings responded that the letter from Fausel Farms objecting to the proposed gating had been copied and given to Council. The City Manager replied that some letters had been received after preparation of the agenda, but that Council had been provided with all letters. I. Donald Carver, 48-760 San Vicente, asked that the project be delayed until architectural considerations could be provided for, so that the proposed fence would be compatible with the fence along the west side of Eisenhower Drive. J. Don Zaraski, representing the La Quinta Sports and Youth Association, requested Council assistance is locating new ballfields for next year, and what provisions the Council would be taking for parks and recreation facilities, such as ballparks and soccer fields. The layor announced that it was the Council's hope to have an answer by the next meeting regarding recreational facilities. K. Louis Perez, representing the La Quinta Sports and Youth Association, stated tha the Association had 350 children needing a place to play ball, and asked the Cit to support City youth. Mr. Perez stated that if help was not provided immediate it would be necessary to abandon the present program for recreation for La Quint?. youth. iayor Allen reiterated his statement that the Council would have an answer for La Quinta Sports and Youth at the August 21, 1984, meeting, regarding additional recreational facilities. BIB] 03-14-96-U01 10:24:35AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 08-U02 07-U02 1984-U02 $MINUTES City Council August 7, 1984 Page Three. 4. WRITTEN COMI?LJNICATIONS A. The City Manager announced that several letters relative to the proposed gating B. and fencing of La Quinta Golf Estates had been received, including letters from C. James R. Forrest, Bruce C. Anderson, Arlene Turi, a person residing at 48-490 San Vicente, Carol W. Jones and Fausel Farms, in addition to four additional telegrams objecting to the proposed fencing. In conjunction with this issue, the City Manager read the title of a proposed Ordinance, as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 60. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING As AN URGENCY MEASURE, CERTAIN REGULATIONS PROHIBITING WALLS, GATES, FENCES AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS ON OR NEAR THE PERIMETER PROJECT BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN PLANNED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS, SUBDIVISIONS AND SIMILAR RESIDENTIAL PROJECTS WHICH MAY BE IN CONFLICT WITH A CONTE'PIATED ZONING PROPOSAL, SAID REGULATIONS TO BE IN EFFECT ON AN INTERIM STUDY BASIS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 65858. The City Manager explained that after receiving numerous communications, above, staff had drafted the proposed Ordinance for Council consideration, and asked the Community Development Director to further explain issues involved in this matter. The Community Development Director explained that the issue regarding the gating and fencing proposal basically concerned two issues: 1) whether the Association had followed its rules and regulations, which would not be within the purview of the City; and 2) appearance of perimeter security fencing. Mr. Stevens explained that the latter issue was within the City's purview, with City staff currently having design criteria function regarding fencing of new developments. He further explained that the intent of the Ordinance would be to allow staff time to draft alternative proposals for discretionary review which would probably take 90-120 days. Council Member Wolff clarifed and stated that the Council was primarily concerned with the appearance of the proposed project, and that by adopting the above Ordinance, Council would have necessary time to review acceptable alternatives. oved by Council Member Wolff, seconded by Council Member Henderson, to waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 60. Roll Call Vote: AYES: Council Members Baier, Henderson, Wolff and Mayor Allen. NOES: None. ABSENT: Council Member Cox. D. The City Manager presented a communication from Joseph W. Connors regarding Office of the Mayor, and re?uested the City Attorney to present an opinion regarding comments by?Mayor Allen which occurred at a Council eeting held July 17, 1984. The City Attorney reported that in his opinion, no slanderous comments had been made by Mayor Allen, and reminded those present that members of the Council are covered, during political discussion with members of the public, undered the privilege of fair comment. The City Attorney further defined legal slander and stated that in his opinion there was no slander contained in the transcript of discussion between Mayor Allen and Mr. Connors. The City Manager read a statement from Council Member Cox stating that in her opinion, no slanderous remarks were made. Council Members Henderson, Eaier and Wolff presented statements regarding the issue. Council Member Baier felt that no slanderous remarks had been made, with Council Member Henderson terming the incident unfortunate. Council Member Wolff stated that after reading the transcript of the comments, felt the comments were inappropriate, but fell short of slander. BIB] 03-14-96-U01 10:24:35AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 08-U02 07-U02 1984-U02 $INUTES City Council August 7, 1984 Page Four. yor Allen stated that he believed it had been proven that his comments were not slanderous, and he would therefore have nothing further to say in the matte E. The City Manager presented a communication from the La Quinta Sports and Youth Association regarding baseball/softball facilities, and stated that the City was discussing possible ideas for Sites for temporary baseball facilities and would be reporting on this matter at the next Council meeting. 5. CO?NT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS A. Council Member Baier reported that he would be leaving on vacation following the Council meeting. B. Council Member Henderson expressed concerns regarding parks and recreation and discussed revenues and expenditures being spent by C.V. Park & Recreation District. Moved by Council Member Henderson, seconded by Council Member Wolff, to direct the City Manager to prepare a plan for the establishment of a Park and Recreation Department and for separation from the Coachella Valley Recreation District, with a proposed budget and timeline to be presented at the Council meeting of August 21, 1984. Unanimously adopted, with Council Member Cox absent. 6. HEARINGs A. The City Manager introduced a public hearing regarding Building Permit No. 0767, an Appeal of Conditions imposed pursuant to Permit No. 0767, construction of a block wall located at 78-199 Calle Fortuna, Louis S. Campagna, Jr., Applicant, and asked the Community Development Director to present the staff report. The Community Development Director explained that Building Permit No. 0767 had been issued July 21, 1984, for construction of a masonry wail located on Mr. Campagna s property, and that within a few days of issuance of the permit, the Community Development Department received several complaints that the subject wall would create drainage problems for surrounding properties. The site was reviewed by the City Engineer and staff, who concurred that the subject wall would create drainage problems for surrounding property and conditions mitigating the problems were attached to Building Permit No. 0767, calling for omission of one block every four feet along the bottom course of the wall to facilitate the natural flow of water across the property. Mr. Campagna subsequently objected to the condition at the Council meeting of July 3rd, after which staff issued a letter dated July 20 to Mr. Campagna explaining the reasons for the condition as requested by Mr. Campagna. The Community Development Director reiterated staff's reasons for imposition of the condition, and explained that the condition still represented the most reasonable alternative to mitigate the problem, and recommended that the appeal be denied and conditions imposed on Permit No. 0767 remain in force. Mayor Allen asked the Applicant if he wished to address the Council regarding the appeal. Mr. Louis Campagna stated that he had requested answers regarding the condition at the July 3rd meeting, and that he did not feel the letter fro? City staff was adequate and that staff had not shown a water flow through his property. Mr. Campagna asked that the Council make a decision tonight. Mayor Allen opened the hearing to comment from the public. There being no comment from the public, Mayor Allen closed the hearing. After discussion among the Council, it was moved by Council Nember Wolff, seconded by Council Member Henderson, to direct the City Manager to set up a BIB] 03-14-96-U01 10:24:35AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 08-U02 07-U02 1984-U02 $MINUTES City Council August 7, 984 Page Five. meeting between the concerned parties in Mr. Campagna s neighborhood and report back to the Council at the August 21, 1984, Council meeting. Unanimously adopted, with Council Member Cox absent. E. The City Manager introduced a public hearing regarding refuse collection and disposal service fees for residential property on the 1985 and subsequent years' tax rolls. Mr. Usher explained the history of mandatory trash collection fees in La Quinta, the City's proposal to place refuse collection on the tax rolls and detailed the 8% reduction in refuse collection rates proposed along with placement on the tax rolls. Mayor Allen opened the hearing to comment from the public. Comment was heard from the following persons: 1) Stanley Sniff, P.O. Box 1414, La Quinta, President of the La Quinta Property Owners, addressed the Council and presented results of a Property Owner?s Association poll regarding mandatory refuse collection fees, and stated that 36% of their members were in favor of the proposal, with 64% voting against the proposal. Mr. Sniff was critical of SCA Services accounting practices and billing procedures, and stated that he felt the action would be unwarranted and unjustified. 2) Juanita Gayer, 49-845 Lago Drive, La Quinta, asked if she should pay trash fees or continue to pay fees through the Association homeowner's account, and questioned the amount of the contract fee. Kathleen White, Office Manager of SCA Services, addressed the condominium and bin service issue, and explained that the condominium association was considered commercial and therefore would not be billed on their property taxes. There was discussion between Council, staff and members of the public regarding placement of single family residences on the tax rolls, with the Council requesting assurance from SCA Services in this regard. 3) William Camm, La Quinta, expressed interest and asked if his billing for trash services would change in any regard, and stated that he was concerned he might possibly be double-billed. Staff assured Mr. Camm that he would not be double-billed. 4) Louis Campagna asked if he would be billed in a different manner at his business. Staff replied that there would be no change in commercial rates or manner of billing procedure. Hearing no further comment from the public, Mayor Allen closed the hearing. After discussion, it was moved by Council Member Wolff, seconded by Council Member Henderson, to adopt Resolution No. 84-54, as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 84-54. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE REPORT PRESCRIBING THE CHARGES FOR RESIDENTIAL PARCELS FOR CITY- FURNISHED REFUSE COLLECTION IN 1985 AND DIRECTING THAT SUCH CHARGES BE COLLECTED ON THE TAX ROLL. Unanimously adopted, with Council Member Cox absent. C. The City Manager introduced a public hearing regarding placement of delinquent refuse collection and disposal service fees for residential property on the 1984- 1985 property tax rolls, and read the title of a proposed Resolution, as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 84-55. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF DELINQUENT WASTE DISPOSAL FEES ON THE 1984-1985 TAX ROLL. BIB] 03-14-96-U01 10:24:35AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 08-U02 07-U02 1984-U02 $MINUTES City Council August 7, 984 Page Six. Mayor Allen opened the hearing to comment from the public. Comment was heard from the following persons: A. Dan Corey, P.O. Box 1205, La Quinta, representing a property management group, expressed concerns regarding delinquent accounts for various clients and billing procedures by SCA Services. The City Manager recommended that Mr. Corey resolve billing discrepancies with Kathleen White, Office Manager for SCA Services, and the list of delinquencies would be corrected prior to adoption of the resolution. He further explained that persons being listed on the delinquent list would be issued refunds by the City if they were able to prove payment to the City's satisfaction. There being no further public comment, 1ayor Allen closed the hearing. Mayor Allen announced the Council would recess for five minutes. ayor Allen reconvened the meeting. After discussion, it was moved by Council Member Wolff, seconded by Council Member Henderson, to adopt Resolution No. 84-55, and approve the Report of Delinquent Waste Disposal Fees, with the deletion of Stanley Sniff and subject to staff adjustments, with refunds to be made by the City for adjustments which cannot be made prior to placement on the tax rolls. Unanimously adopted. C. The City Manager introduced a public hearing regarding use of General Revenue Sharing funds for fiscal year 1984-1985. The City Manager recommended that a budget of $61,184 to be used for purchase of capital equipment, be approved. Mayor Allen opened the hearing to comment from the public. There being no public comment, Mayor Allen closed the hearing. Moved by Council Member Baier, seconded by Council Member Henderson, to approve an expenditure of General Revenue Sharing funds for Fiscal Year 1984-1985, in the amount of $61,184.00. Unanimously adopted. 7. CONSENT CALENDAR Moved by Council Member Wolff, seconded by Council Member Baier, to adopt the Consent Calendar. Roll Call Vote: AYES: Council Members Baier, Wolff and Mayor Allen. NOES: None. ABSTAIN: Council Member Henderson. ABSENi': Council Member Cox. A. 1?e Minutes of a regular Council meeting held July 17, 1984, were approved as corrected. B. RESOLUTION NO. 84-56. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA UINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEMANDS. C. Acceptance of Final Tract Map No. 20158 on a portion of Duna La Quinta, Clark Development Corporation. 8. BUSINESS SESSION A. The City Manager read the title of a proposed Ordinance, as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 61 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ThE CITY CF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING AP FOR THE CITY, BY REZONING CER?AIN PROPERTY REFERRED TO IN CHANGE OF ZONE CASE NO. 84-008. BIB] 03-14-96-U01 10:24:35AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 08-U02 07-U02 1984-U02 $MINUTES Citv Council August 7, 1984 Page Seven. Moved by Council Member Henderson, seconded by Council Member Wolff, to waive further reading and adopt Ordinance No. 61. Roll Call Vote: AYES: Council Members Bajer, Henderson, Wolff and Mayor Allen. NOES: None. ABSENT: Council Member Cox. B. The City Manager read the title of a proposed Ordinance, as follows: ORDINANCE NO. 62. AN O?mINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY REFERRED TO IN CHANGE OF ZONE CASE NO. 84-O?O. Roll Call Vote: AYES: Council Members Baier, Henderson, Wolff and Mayor Allen. ES: None. SENT: Council Member Cox. C. The City Manager read the title of a proposed Resolution, as follows: RESOLUTION NO. 84-57. A RESOLUTION OF ThE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, INITIATING PROCEEDINGS RELATIVE TO ANNEXATION NO. 2, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 35220. The City Manager explained that the purpose of the resolution was to set the date of a public hearing for September 18, 984, relative to Annexation No. 2. Moved by Council Member Wolff, seconded by Council Member Baier, to adopt Resolution No. 84-57. Unanimously adopted, with Council Member Cox absent and Council Member Henderson abstaining. D. The City Manager presented a report regarding an Agreement for Prosecution Services with the County of Riverside, for provision of district attorney services, and recommended approval of the agreement for the period of July L, 1984, to June 30, 1985. Moved by Council Member Henderson, seconded by Council Member Baier, to approve an Agreement for Prosecution Services with the County of Riverside for the period of July 1, 984, through June 30, 1985. Unanimously adopted, with Council Member Cox being absent. E. The City Manager presented a report regarding award of bid for City Project No. 84-4, Installation of Stop Signs at Various Locations. He explained that bids had been received from three bidders, with the low bidder being Safety Striping Service, Inc., of Fillmore, California, at $22,705.00, and recommended award of bid to Safety Striping Service, Inc. Moved by Council Member Wolff, seconded by Council Member Henderson, to award bid for City Project 84-4, to Safety Striping Service, Inc., in the amount of $22,705.00. Unanimously adopted, with Council Member Cox being absent. F. The City Manager presented a report regarding Notice of Completion, City Project No. 84-1, and recommended the Council authorize and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion for work associated with City Project No. 84-1, resurfacing of Avenida La Fonda and Calle Estado, with the County Recorder's Office. BIB] 03-14-96-U01 10:24:35AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 08-U02 07-U02 1984-U02 $MINUTES City Council August 7, 1984 Page Eight After discussion, it was moved by Council Member Baier, seconded by Council Member Wolff, to authorize and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion for work associated with City Fro]ect No. 84-1, resurfacing of Avenida La Fonda and Calle Estado, with the County Recorder's Office, and to direct City staff to check with the City Engineer regarding problems with striping associated with City Project No. 84-1, and possible monetary reimbursement to the City. Unanimously adopted, with Council Member Cox absent. G. The City Manager presented a report regarding Notice of Completion, City Project No. 84-2, and recommended the Council authorize and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion for work associated with City Project No. 84-2, cross gutter construction, Westward Ho Drive & Jefferson Street, with the County Recorder's Office. Moved by Council Member Henderson, seconded by Council Member Wolff, to authorize and direct the City Clerk to file a Notice of Completion for work associated with City Project No. 84-2, cross gutter construction, Westward Ho Drive and Jefferson Street, with the County Recorder's Office. Unanimously adopted with Council Member Cox absent. H. The City Manager presented a report regarding continued discussion of direct election of the Mayor, and stated that the following resolutions were prepared for Council action: RESOLUTION NO. 84-58. A RESOLUTION OF ThE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE SUBMISSION TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF THE CITY AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTI? OF NOV?BER, 1984, QUESTIONS REGARDING ELECTIVE MAYOR. RESOLUTION NO. 84-59. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ThE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AUThORIZING CERTAIN OF ITS IBERS TO FILE A WRITTEN ARGUMENT REGARDING A CITY MEASURE. RESOLUTION NO. 84-60. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OP THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY MEASURES SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS. After discussion, it was moved by Council Member Wolff, seconded by Council Member Henderson, to adopt Resolution No. 84-58. Unanimously adopted, with Council Member Cox being absent. Moved by Council Member Henderson, seconded by Council Member Wolff, to adopt Resolution No. 84-59. Unanimously adopted, with Council Member Cox absent. Moved by Council MembeT Henderson, seconded by Council Member Wolff, to adopt Resolution No. 84-60. Unanimously adopted, with Council Member Cox absent. I. The City Manager presented a report from the Downtown Planning Advisory Committee regarding future location of City Hall. Council Member Wolff explained that the D.P.A.C. had unanimously endorsed the position that the future location of City Hall be within the traditional downtown area, which would be both beneficial and essential to maintaining the viability of the area. A letter of support for the idea from the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors was read into the record. Moved by Council Member Wolff, seconded by Council Member Henderson, that the Council commit that when the City seeks a site for the future location of Citv Hall, the site will be located south of 50th Avenue and west of Adams Street. Unanimously adopted with Council Member Cox being absent. BIB] 03-14-96-U01 10:24:35AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 08-U02 07-U02 1984-U02 $MINUTES City Council August 7, 1984 Page Nine J. The City Manager presented a report from the Community Development Director regarding the General Plan Advisory Committee. The Community Development Director stated that the Committee will be composed of ten to twelve members representing various sectors of the community? who will be assigned the task of providing guidance and will review ideas and concepts during the preparation of the La Quinta General Plan. The Community Development Director advised the Council that the Committee should be appointed no later than August 21, 1984, to facilitate the current time frame which has been established with our General Plan consultant. It was the consensus of the Council that each Council Member should return with two names of persons to serve of this Committee at the Council meeting of August 21, 1984. K The City Manager presented a report regarding an agreement with the Coachella Valley Mosquito Abatement District regarding tax increment. Moved by Council Member Henderson, seconded by Council Member Wolff, to approve an Agreement between the City and the Coachella Valley Mosquito Abatement District for tax increment. Unanimously adopted. L. The Community Development Director presented a report regarding the Urban Land Institute, and explained that an application to the Urban Land Institute had been accepted for the Fall session. Mr. Stevens further explained that staff was requesting Council authorization to enter into a contract for a Downtown Market Study, at a cost not to exceed $12,000. Moved by Council Member Wolff, seconded by Council Member Henderson, to authorize staff to proceed with the Urban Land Institute application and authorize staff to negotiate and enter into a contract not to exceed $12,000. Unanimously adopted, with Council Member Cox being absent. 9. ADJOURNbl?T Moved by Council Member Henderson, seconded by Council Member Wolff, to adjourn. The regular meeting of the City Council of the City of La Quinta held Tuesday, August 7, 1984, was adjourned at 10:23 p.m. at City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California. BIB] 03-14-96-U01 10:24:35AM-U01 CCMIN-U02 08-U02 07-U02 1984-U02