1984 07 03 CC AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CITY 9F LA QUINTA
A regular meeting of the City
Council to be held at City Hall,
78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta,
California.
July 3, 1984 7:30 p.m.
1. CALL TO ORDER
A. Flag Salute
2. ROLL CALL
3. PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for citizens to address the City Council on matters
pertaining to City business. When addressing the City Council, please state your
name and address. The proceedings of the Council meetings are recorded on tape
and comments of each person shall be limited to three 3) minutes.
4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A. Continued consideration of a communication from the La Quinta Arts Foundation
regarding financial assistance for the 1984-1985 fiscal year.
B. Continued consideration of a communication from the Property Owners' for
La Quinta regarding a requested Sphere of Influence for the City of La Quinta.
C. Communication from Bobbie Connors regarding direct election of a Mayor.
D. Communication from Mrs. Jo Williams regarding City weed abatement program.
E. Communication from Mrs. Alfred Patricia) Reilly regarding City weed abatement
program.
F. Communication from T.A. Tadros regarding flood hazard concerns.
C. Communication from Luanne Dewitt regarding City improvements.
5. COMMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
6. HEARINGS
A. Public hearing regarding Change of Zone Case No. 84-011, a request to approve
a change of zone from A-1-1O to R-2-12,OOO on a 79+ acre site located on the
south side of 50th Avenue, one-quarter mile east of Adams Street alignment,
Morris and Grayson, Inc./Rufus Associates, Applicant.
1. Report from the Planning Commission.
2. Ordinance for introduction.
B. Public hearing regarding Plot Plan No. 84-044, Appeal of Planning Commission
Denial of an Appeal of Condition of Approval) a request to delete condition
of approval requiring heating and cooling mechanical equipment to be ground
mounted, Thurston and Joan Pendley, Applicants.
1. Report from the Planning Commission.
2. Communication from Thurston & Joan Pendley.
3. Motion for adoption.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
AGENDA City Council
July 3, 1984
Page Two.
C. Public hearing regarding Change of Zone Case No. 84-010, approval of Change
of Zone from R-1-12,0O0/Planned Development to R-1-10,000/Planned Development
to allow for a planned residential development in conjunction with a proposed
Tentative Tract Map No. 20016, located at the northwest corner of Miles Avenue
and Dune Palms Road, Psomas and Associates, Applicant.
1. Report from the Planning Commission.
2. Ordinance for introduction.
D. Public hearing regarding Tentative Tract Map No. 20016, Amended No* 1, request
for approval of a 140-unit, detached, single-family, planned residential
development on a 33-acre parcel located at the northwest corner of Miles Avenue
and Dune Palms Road, Psomas and Associates, Applicant.
1. Report from the Planning Commission.
2. Motion for adoption.
7. CONSENT CALENDAR
A. Approval of the Minutes of a regular meeting of the City Council held June 19,
1984.
B. PROPOSED RESOLUTION. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
DEMANDS.
8. BUSINESS SESSION
A. Report from the Planning Department and Planning Commission regarding
continued consideration of Change of Zone Case No. 84-008, a request to approve
a Change of Zone from R-1-12,OOO/PD to R-1-1O,OO0/PD to allow a planned
residential development in accordance with Proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 19903.
1. Ordinance for introduction.
B. Report from the Planning Department and Planning Commission regarding continued
consideration of Tentative Tract Map. No. 19903, a request to approve a 160-unit,
single-family, planned residential development on a 40-acre site.
1. Motion for adoption.
C. Report from the City Manager regarding collection of curb and gutter fees
and bonds.
1. Motion for adoption.
D. Report from the City Manager regarding investment of City funds.
1. Resolution for adoption.
2. Resolution for adoption.
3. Resolution for adoption.
E. Report from the City Attorney regarding reconirnended termination of phantom
maintenance districts.
1. Motion for adoption.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
AGENDA City Council
July 3, 1984
Page Three.
F. Report from the City Attorney regarding establishment of an Historical
Society.
1. Ordinance for introduction.
G. Report from the City Manager regarding delinquent waste disposal billing *
policies and procedures and delinquencies for the 1984-1985 tax rolls.
1. Resolution for adoption.
2. List of delinquent accounts.
3. Motion for adoption.
H. Report from the City Manager regarding Retired Senior Volunteer Program.
1. Motion for adoption.
I. Report from the Traffic Safety Committee regarding speed zoning in La Quinta.
1. Motion for adoption.
J. Report from the Community Safety Coordinator regarding additional traffic
control signage for uncontrolled intersections.
1. Motion for adoption.
K. Report from the Traffic Safety Committee regarding a proposed change in
membership of the Committee.
1. Motion for adoption.
L. Report from the City Manager regarding the Fiscal Year 1984-1985 Budget.
1. Resolution for adoption.
2. Resolution for adoption.
M. Other.
9. ADJOURNMENT
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
+/-4
LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION
78-431 Hwy 111
La Quinta, Ca 92253
June 29, 1984
The Honorable Larry Allen
Mayor, City of La Quinta
Post Office Box 1504
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California 92253
Dear Mayor Allen:
As the City Council requested at its last study session, we
are enclosing a copy of the Foundation's Preliminary Budget
for 1984-85. The Board of Directors will be meeting to re-
view and adopt the final budget late this summer.
This proposed budget was prepared by the Budget Committee
with input from the various Committee Chairpersons and the
Executive Committee. It was formulated using historical
costs, taking into consideration the Foundation's goals for
the coming year, yet being conservative in our projections
for both income and expenditures.
Zeny Cieslikowski and myself will be available to answer any
questions you or the other Council Members may have.
Sincerely,
LA QUI*TA ARTS FOUNDATION
Michael O'Rourke
Treasurer
MO/css
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Frank M. Usher, City Manager
Date: June 29, 1984
Subject: Requested Sphere of Influence for City of La Quinta
A meeting had been scheduled among Mayor Allen, Mayor Pro Tem Cox
and myself and representatives from the City of Coachella for
this week. However, at the request of the City of Coachella, it
was necessary to change the meeting to next Tuesday morning, and
it will be necessary to report to the Council orally regarding
the outcome of that meeting.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
June 13, 1984
Frank Usher
City manager
City of La Quinta
P.O. Box 1504
La Quinta, C*. 92253
Subject: City of La Ouinta
Sphere of Influence
Dear Mr. Usher:
By letter dated may 25, 1984 we advised you that a number of property
owners would like to have La *Quinta's Sphere of Influence extended east-
erly to Highway 86 and southerly to *venue 65 as shoun by the map attached
to the aforementioned letter.
By that same letter we advised you that we were in the process of
determing property owner interest thru an informational mailing. We
requested those property owners in support of the proposed Sphere of
Influence to complete petitions we furnished them and filed them with
the City of La Ouinta.
Based on the interest shown thus far, we hereby request the City of
La Ouinta to initiate proceedings for the proposed Sphere of Influence.
*lthough the proposed Sphere of Influence contains about 25,000 acres 39
sections), about 18,000 acres are in private ownership gross area includ-
ing streets). *ssuming the street accupy about 10% of the private owner-
ship and recognizing that about 2,000 acres of private ownership are in
mountainous terrain, the net developable area of the proposed Sphere is
about 14,000 acres.
We believe the initial response to the petition drive, which began
about 3 weeks ago, is significant and warrants initiation of the Sphere
of Influence process. We understand that about 100 petitions have been
filed with the City and that these petitions represent about 3,000 acres
of private ownership. In addition, we understand that these petitions
are continuing to be filed and based on the response during the past 3
weeks, we expect that adequate support for the proposed Sphere will be
demonstrated within the next 3 weeks.
If you have any questions about our request, I will respond to them
promptly.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
a
If you need any additional data, please ad*ise. In the meantime,
iie will ontinue to urge property owners to submit their petitions.
Yours truly,
Property Owners
or La *uinta
J n P. Powell
0 ordinator
JPP/gs
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
$4
P.O. Box 1002
La *Quinta, Ca 92253
June 21, l98*
His Honour, Mayor Lawrence Allen
Members of the City Council of La *uinta
78105 Calle Estado
ij*< *uinta, Ca 92253
Re: Election of the Mayor
Dear Sirs:
After visiting with several La Quinta residents, it is clear to me
that our City Charter should be amended so as to elect a Mayor. It
is presumed that the term of office *ould be for two years. Those
to whom I spoke would like the La Quinta City Council to take the
prper initiative to make this change possible. I think this change
is favored about 5 to 1 by local residents.
If action is not taken then a petition will be circulated. There
are currently 2,682 registered voters in La Quinta. Fifteen per cent
15%) or *03 signatures are required to place the petition on the
November ballot, or on a special election" ballot. Perhaps the
City Council would prefer to act immediately. By so doing, they could
save the City the cost of $l.14o per voter or $3,75*.OC, the cost for the
special election.
Your consideration of this proposed change is appreci*ted.
Yours sincerely,
L'Bob*ieConn*s
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
6A4
*2*
44*
I
Ad
#A' /*
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
I
4
* ///$:#*6&
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
June 18, l98*
P.O. Box lO*
L9a22*u3inta, Ca.
La *uinta City Council
P.O. Box l*4
La Quinta, Ca. 922*3
Honorable Mayor and Council *`*mbers:
I appeal to the City Council to give added attention to the
details of the projected weed abatement program.
It may not be understood by all that the growth on the bajada
in the Cove area of La Quinta protects us from both blow sand
and flooding from sur*ace water runoff during severe weather.
The brush also, not incidentally, provides cover and nesting
for our roadrunners and Gambells quail.
I request that when the Staff corrmunicates with the owners of
undeveloped lots, at least in the Cove area, regarding removal
of debris from their property, that they be asked not to remove
indigo, cat's claw acacia, brittle bush, cheese bush or chupe-
rosa* no* smoke trees and Palo Verde. The letter might also
warn that the summer months are not safe for working in the
brush because of danger from intense ground temperatures and
snakes. It is to be hoped that bulldozing will not be permit-
ted in connection with this project).
While unimpeded surface runoff would impact most heavily on
property at lower elevation, we all know the nuisance that blow
sand causes when the land is denuded and the delicate crust of
the desert is disturbed. In any event, perYraps it is more im-
portant that the City attend to the growth at street corners
that impairs drivers' vision.
I respectfully urge your consideration of my request.
Sincerely,
MRS. ALFRED)PATRICIA REILLY
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
#/L%
T. A. Tadros
P. 0. Box 1024
Palm Desert, CA 92261
June 26, 1984
City of La Quinta
78-105 Calle Estado
P. 0. Box 1504
La Quinta, CA 92253
Attention: Mr. Larry Allen
Dear Mr. Alien:
The purpose of this letter is to protest in the strongest terms the issuance
of a building permit for the construction of a block wall which is under
construction on Lot 4 of Block 6 of Desert Club Tract Unit No.1 769-105-004).
This lot, which is on Calle Fortuna 4 lots east of Desert Club Drive, has
historically carried the drainage of flood waters coming down Calle Cadiz
from the west and Desert Club Drive from the south. The block wall which is
under construction at this time along west and south property lines of Lot 4
will impede and dam the natural flow of waters from the areas upstream and
may cause additional flood hazard to nearby properties, including mine, and
concentrate run-off on downstream properties which do not now receive the
run-off in question.
Upon calling the Building Department, I was told that a permit had been
issued for a block wall but not for a residence. Plans for the residence,
which would presumably include the necessary site engineering, were going to
be submitted at a later date. I feel that the wall permit was issued
prematurely in advance of the materials required to accompany the site and
drainage plan for the residence. I also assume that adequate provision to
receive and dispose of the flood waters in question in a reasonable and safe
manner necessary to the protection of the potentially affected surronding
property will be addressed prior to the issuance of a permit for the
residence will be required of the applicant.
Last Thursday, June 21st., I brought the matter to the attention of the City
Manager and the Building Department. They investigated the matter on the
site and acknowledged that I did infact have a problem. I was assured that
the construction would not proceed until a solution to the drainage had been
found. I left town feeling safe in that assurance only to return home
Tuesday the 26th to discover that construction of the wall had in fact
proceeded and that my drainage is blocked by that portion of the wall
already in place.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
I stongly urge the City to review the drainage provisions of the block wall
under construction and to rescind the permit in question until the safety of
the surronding properties from added flood hazard can be assured. I further
request that the work now completed be immediately removed or altered as to
remove any threat of contributing to the flooding of my property.
I will hold the property owner, the city of La Quinta, and the individuals
in the city who acted improperly in granting this permit and allowing this
construction, personally and severally liable for any damage which may result
to my home as the result of this action.
I also wish to register my unhappiness with the rude and unkind manner in
which some members of your staff have chosen to respond to my reqest for aid
in this manner.
Ve*/ truly yours,
ft:A. Tadros
78-170 Calle Cadiz
La Quinta, CA
Telephone 619) *64-3387
cc: City Attorney, Mr. James Longtin
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
7
*
7;Zw *
z<(2
* *
*
*
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
I I
#3<;
*`/-
*
4*
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
$4
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: The Honorable M*yor and **rs of the City Council
From: Planning C*rTnissicn
Date July 3, 1984
Subject O*ANGE OF Z* CASE No. 84-Oil
location: South Side of 50th Avenue, One Quarter Mile East of Adams Street Alignment-
Applicant: Morris and Grayson, Inc. /RufuS Associates
I*quest: Approval of a Change of Zone frem A-1-1O to R-2-12,OOO on a 79j Acre Site
On June 12, 1984, the Planning caccissicn conducted a public hearing on the requested
C*iange of Zone and unanimously rec*tmands approval of the diange to R-2-12,0OO as
requested.
Major points discussed by the Planning *rcission on this matter included:
Differences beteeen the R-l and R-2 Zones.
Appropriateness of approving zoning without a devel*m**t plan.
It was the consensus of the **ssion that there remained sufficient future discre-
tionary reviews for any project.
Lawrence Spector, Applicant, appeared in support of the request.
* one else appeared on the matter.
A APED BY.
Lawrence L. Stevens, AI*
Planning Director
ILS:dm*T
Atchs: 1. June 12, 1984 *iLL)
2. Ordinance
APPROVED
*TO CON*ENT.
CITY COUNCI
OF_
CITY M AGER
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: The *norable *iaaan and *bers of the Planning C(xti*ssion
From: Planning Depar*t
Date: June 12, 1984
Subject: CH**NGE OF Z*E CASE NO. 84-011
Location: South side of 50th Avenue, On*uarter Mile East of Adams
Street Aligiwnt
Applicant: *rris and Grayson, Inc./Rufus Associates
F*quest: Zone *ian*e from A-1-10 to R-2-12,000 on a 79:: acre site
BACKG*OUND INBDR!*TICN
1. General Plan
a. Site: Very Low* Density Pesidential 3 or less units/acre).
b. Surrounding Area: Very Low Density Residential to east, *west and south,
Specific Plan No.127 to the north; Streets 50th Avenue, Major Hi*hway,
100' wide right-of-way.
2. Zoning
a. Site: A-1-10 Light Agriculture, 10-acre miniir* parcel size).
b. Surrounding Area: A-1-10, R-l-l, R-l-12,000, R-2-12,0001 R-2-4800,
R-3 SP), R-5 See attached exhibit).
3. Existing *nditions: The site is flat with saady soil. The site is currently
a producing citrus orchard. The properties to the north, south and east are
also citrus orchards; the lard to the west is in natural sand dunes. 50th
Avenue is an existing t*lane, paved road. Water lines are existing at 50th
Avenue and Washington Street and se*er lines are existing on Adams Street and
westward on 50th Avenue. Electric distribution lines exist on the portions
of the east and west sides of the proper* and along the north side of 50th
Avenue. The site is serviced by underground telephone cable.
4. Envfrc*r**tal Asses*r*t: An initial enviro:*tal study of the project was
prepared by staff and it was determined tentatively that the project will not
have a significant adverse irt**ct on the environment. Approval of this zone
change request and the ultimate development of the site with to 1 acre
h*sites will result in a decrease in agricultural land in production.
H*ever, the Applicant has stated that, as with the adjacent proposed hotel
site, a substantial majority of the existing orchard will be retained and
r*nain in production. Review of future land division or development plans
will include consideration of the design with respect to the preservation and
protection of the trees.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
" NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
# NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
$ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
% NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
& MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To; The Honorable Mayor and **ribers of the City Council
From: Planning C**ssion i)
Date; July 3, 1984
Subject: P* PlAN No. 84-044, Appeal of Planning Ocoossion Denial of an
Appeal of Condition of Approval.
IDcation: Northwest Corner of Avenida Martinez and Calle Ensenada
Applicant: Thurston and Joan Pendley
pequest: Pequest to Delete Condition of Approval Requiring Heating and Cooling
Mecnanical E**xt*nt to be Cround Mounted.
On *ine 22, 1984, the Applicants s*tted an appeal of the Planning c(aaission
decision. The letter and various attachrrents su**nitted by the Applicant are
included for your information. Note: The original photos will be distributed
at the meeting.)
On June 12, 1984, the Planning C*uiission considered an appeal by the Pendleys on
the mechanical equipment location and unan*' sly denied the appeal pursuant to
the Staff Memorandum dated June 12.
Major points discussed by the Planning Ccocission on this matter included:
o Inadeguacy of pr*sed parapets in screening equipment.
o **willingness of Applicant to raise parapets of flat-roofed
structure to adequately screen equipment.
o **ftance of adequate screening to the goals of architectural
review of single-farrLily dwellings.
o *isteece of other roof-itounted mech*nical equipment in the
Cove area.
o Alternate locations available for the' Applicant's r**ianical
equipeent.
It was the consensus of the Planning ccooission that the proposed screening
methods offered by the Applicant were inadeuuate given the architectural considera-
tions of the flat-roofed design.
Thurston Pendley, Applicant, appeared in support of the prpposed ir*thods to screen
roof-it*unted equipeent. He pointed out several projects which he felt had been
treated differently and objected to increasing the parapet height, placing the
equipeent within a closet or ground*unting it.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
'STh* REPOPT c*rv COUNCIL
July 3, 1984
Page 2.
No one else a*eared on the matter.
Lawrence L. Stevens, AI*
Planning Director
Atchs: 1. *al Letter W/Atchs.
2. Photos
3. June 12 *ii*
TC Cr.*LT
C i *
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
) NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
* NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
+ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
, NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
- NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
. NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
/ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
0 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
1 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
3 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
4 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
5 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
6 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
7 MEMORANbUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: The Honorable *yor and * of the City Council
From; Planning c***ssion
Date: July 3, 1984
Subject: CH**NGE: OF ZONE: CASE No. 84-010
Location: Northwest*st Corner of Miles Avenue and Dune Palms Road
Applicant: Psomas*nas and Associates
Request: Approv** of Change of Zone fr* R-1-12,000/Planned Develop tent to
R-1-l0, 00 0/Planned Devel*ir*t to Allow for a Planned Residential
DEVELOPMENT in Conjunction with a Proposed Tentative Tract *Map No.
20016.
On June 12 and 21, 1984, the Planning C**ssi* conducted public hearings on the
proposed zone change and unar*sly recoee*s approval of a mange of Zone fr*n
R-l-12,000/PD to R-1-11,000/PD not the R-1-10,000 requested). Attached are Staff
*3r*randa dated June 12 and 21 related to this matter.
Major points dlscussed by the Planning Com*ssion relating to this matter included:
Allowable densities and existing zoning on surrounding
properties.
o History of annexation and prezoning for this area.
o Concerns raised by the City Council in its review of
the *rizon Pa*s tentative tract on the adjacent parcel.
o Tightness" in the design of the associated tentative tract.
o Alternatives to requested zoning.
It was the consensus of the C*rit*ssion that scoe adjustment in the zoning, and a
corresponding increase in the general plan density, was appropriate to encourage
planned residential developeents rather than single-family lot subdivisions) and
to encourage a design with extensive open space, although a reduction in the zoning
and density requested was de*ned necessary.
William Tackabery, Applicant, appeared at the hearings in support of his request
for R-l-10,000 zoning, pointing out the merits of the project design and the need
for reasonable densities to allow planned residential developtents and mid-range
priced housing.
*. C.
I)
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
8 I I
S* I*EPO* C*I'Y CCX3NCIL
July 3, 1984
Page 2.
No one else appeared at the hearing.
*wrenoe L. Stevens, AICP
P1*xiinq Director
Ils:dm*7
Atchs: 1. June 21, 1984 4:*it*
2. June 12, 1984 *
3. Qrdinance
APP*OVED
Lx
C *
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
9 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
: NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
; NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
< NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
= NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
> NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
@ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
B 4
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
*
To: The k)norable Mayor and MEtbers of the City Council
From: Planning Co*ssion
Date: July 3, 1984
Subject: Th*NTATIvE ThA** * NO. 20016, AMEND* NO. 1
Location: Northwest Corner of Miles Avenue and Dune Palms Road i)
Applicant: Psccas and Associates
Request: Approval of a 140-Unit, Detached, Singl*Family, Planned Residential
Development on a 3 3-Acre Parcel.
011 June 12 and 21, 1984, the Plan*ung Ccrrnission conducted public hearings on the
proposed tract and unanTh*usly rec*r[rends approval of the tentative tract map,
subject to the conditions set forth in the attached June 12, 1984, Staff Memorandum
with the following revisions:
1. Add Conditions 5.(a) and 5.(b) to read as follows:
5. a) The nunber of dwelling units shall be reduced to
a maxirirn of 130 units."
5. b) The revised site plan shall be subject to review
and approval by the Planning **ssion and shall
caiply with the following performance standards:
1) Mini distance between rears of buildings
shall be 40 feet.
2) Minimum distance between sides of buildings
shall be 10 feet.
3) MinImLirn setback frcin interior property lines
shall be 20 feet.
4) Mirilinum distance between the side of one building
and the rear of an abutting building shall be 15
feet."
2. *d Condition No.25 to read as follows:
25. Applicant shall contribute to the cost of inproving Dune
Palms Road as it crosses the **hitewater Storm Channel.
Said contribution shall be made prior to recordation of a
final map and shall be based on the estimated cost of the
improvements as deterifLined fr*n a plan prepared by a
pegistered Civil Engineer and approved by the City. The
amount of the contribution shall be detenidned by the City
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
CSThFF REPO* C*IY *UNCIL
July 3, 1984
Page 2.
Major points discussed by the Planning C**ssion related to this matter included:
o Tightness" in the site layout of certain buildings within
the project i.e., too close to each other or to propay
lines).
o Possible need for restro*n facilities at the c*rrunity pool
areas.
o Fencing of private yards for some units.
o * of units to be all*'ed as related to reocir*ded
zoning.
o Width of bicycle/pedestrian path on Miles Avenue.
o Need to participate in irr*roveeent of Dune Palms crossing
of V*iitewater Storm *iannel.
It was the consensus of the Planning *nission that the design was aoceptable if
the tightness" was alleviated with a reduction in the nubbar of units and the
establishnant of perfoxinanee standards for spacing units within the project.
William Tackabery, Applicant, appeared in support of the project as requested noting
minor site plan revision that relieved some of the tightness" and that could be
applied similarly to other tight" areas. Mr. Ta*abery noted that the project had
already been significanily redesigned at staff' S request resulting in a nuich linproved
site plan.
No one else appeared at the hearing.
N*: The City Attorney is reca**nding that the City drop the phantan" assessrnnt
district as a standard condition and, if that rea*r*tion is followed, then
Condition *. 20 should be deleted.)
p*D BY:
Lawrence L. Stevens, MCP
Plar)n*g Director
IlS:aflw
Atchs: 1. June 21, 1984 i*i*:*i*
2. June 12, 1984 *
A*,PRC)VED
f*s*To cO*TEr*T.
L * C*'( COd i C*L *
CITh(-*AGER
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
D NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
E NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
F NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
G NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
H NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
I NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
J NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
K NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
M NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
N NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
O NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
P NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
Q RESOLUTION NO.84-44
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING DEMANDS.
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta,
California, to approve demands as shown on the Demand/Warrant Register
dated July 3, 1984.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this 3rd day of July, 1984.
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
CITY ATTORNEY
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
R NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
T I I
MEMORANbUM * A.
CITY OF LA QUINTA
I,
To: The Honorable Mayor and *rbers of the City Council
From: Planning Department and Planning Ccuiniss ion
Date: July 3, 1984
Subject: CW*NGE OF Z**E CASE No. 84-008
*ocation: Southwest Corner of Fred Waring Drive and Dune Palms Road
Applicant: General Management Corporation dba Horizon Palms"
Request: *roval of a Change of Zone fr** R-l-12,000/PD to R-l-l0,000/PD
to Allow a Planned rresidential Develo**t in Accordance with Proposed
*Tentative Tract Map No.19903.
On June 5, 1984, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the proposed Change
of Zone and referred the matter back to Staff with directions to meet with the
*licant and revise the project density and design to conform to the existing zoning.
The Planning Department Staff net with the Applicant to discuss these concerns, hilt
the Applicant did not indicate a willingness to make the requested reductions.
Since a tentative tract on an adjacent parcel, *which would likely cause similar
concerns, was also before the Planning C*miission, Staff suggested that the C**ssion
nay desire to hold a special meeting to give consideration to both projects and develop
a consistent recutu**tion. On June 21, 1984, the Planning Co*ssion reviee'ed its
prior recoe*dation on the subject Change of Zone and unanisly revised that
rec*rndation to allow for R-1-ll,000 zoning rather than the R-l-l0,000 previously
recarir*ed). It should be noted that several C*ttnissioners had sare reluctance about
changing the reco*endatiori because they parbicularly liked the site develo*in*t plan.
Major points discussed by the Planung ccooission related to this matter included:
o Allowable densities and existing zoning on surrounding properties.
History of annexation and prezoning in this area.
Concerns raised by the City Council.
o Alternatives to requested zoning.
o Desirability of proposed design of associated tentative tract.
It was the consensus of the Planning Cor*ssion to revise slightly its recorrirlendation
although some adjustment to the existing zoning was deeeed appropriate to encourage
planned residential develop,re*t and to encourage a desirable design with extensive
open space.
Michael Buccino, Iar*scape Architect for the project, appeared and requested that
the Planning Ca*ssicn not change its prior reccum*dation on the zone change.
No one else appeared on the matter.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
U SI**' PEPOPT CITY C*CIL
July 3, 1984
Page 2.
subsequent to this June 21 **eting, the Planning Department Staff has had further
discussions with the Applicant' S representatives and it appears that the Applicant
may not object to the revised zoning and corresponding loss of 14 units 160 units
down to 146), as n* rec*ed by the Cconission. In the event that the City
Council supports even further reductions, the alternatives discussed in the June 21
Staff *randurri to the Planning C*rmission can be considered.
Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP
Planning Director
Atchs: 1. June 21, 1984 *:iiL)
2. Revised ordinance
3. June 5, 1984 * to City Council
4. May 8, 1984 *LL)
APF*OV*D
CO T*iT
W*C*TY COUiJ C); r**E*iN)
OF *
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
V NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
W NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
X NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
Y NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
Z NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
[ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
\ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
] NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
^ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
_ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
` NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
a NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
b NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
c NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
d NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
e NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
f MEMORANbUM
CITV OF LA QUINTA
To: The Honorable *yor and *nbers of the City Council
From: Planning *pa*t and Planning Ca*'ssion
Date: July 31 1984
Subject: *TENTATIVE**TIVE * * No. 19903
location: Southwest Corner of *Fred Waring Drive and Dune Palms *
Applicant: General M*ge:*t Corporation dba Horizon Palms"
RegLiest: Approval to Establish a 160-Unit, Single*Family, Planned Residential
Develo*nt on a 40-Acre Site
Oh June 5, 1984, the City Council conducted a public hearing on the proposed
tentative tract and referred the matter back to Staff with directions to meet with
the Applicant in order to revise the floor plan of the smaller unit to ca*ly with
Ordinance *. 38 and to reduce the project density to conform to the existing zoning.
The Planning Department Staff net with the Applicant to discuss these concerns, but
the Applicant did not indicate a willingness to make the density reduction while
noting that the floor areas caild be increased.
Since a tentative tract on an adjacent parcel, which would likely cause similar
concerns, was also before the Planning Caruiission, Staff suggested that the
Cc:*ssicn may desire to hold a special meeting to give consideration to both
projects and develop a consistent reca**dation. On June 21, 1984, the Planning
C:ooission reviewed its prior r**dation on the subject tentative tract and
unan**usly revised that r***tion to add the follewing conditions:
5. a) The * of units shall be reduced to a maximum
of 147."
30. Applicant shall contribute to the cost of IIr*roving
Dune Palms Read as it crosses the **Whitewater Storm
Channel. Said contribution shall be made prior to
recordation of a final inap and shall be based on the
estimated cost of the Ii*rovenents as detenrined frcm
a plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer and
approved by the City. The air*unt of the contribution
shall be deterrftined by the City Council."
It should be noted that several Car*ssioners had sar* reluctance about changing
* the reccrr[**dation because they particularly liked the site develo*xr*nt plan.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
g*I*FF I*EPORI CITY *UNCIL
July 3, 19B4
Page 2.
Major points discussed by the Cc[*ssion related to this matter included:
Reductiori in units to accaITm*ate revised zoning re*ii*dation.
o Need to participate in iir*ra**eeent of Dune Palms crossing of
*Whitewater Storm Channel.
o **ge in area of smaller unit floor *1afl and in mix of smaller
and larger units fr*n 50-50 to 40-60).
Michael Buccino, Landscape Architect for the project, appeared and noted that the
Applicant desired the 160 units previously approved. He pointed out that the unit
mix and floor plans had been changed to cc***ly with Ordinance No. 38. It was also
and icated that the smaller unit would be further increased in area to exceed 1000
square feet in response to Council and Staff concerns. No one else appeared on the
matter.
subsequent to this June 21 rreeting, the Planning Departrr*t Staff has had further
discussions with the Applicant's representatives and it a**eared that several
additional changes would be forthcooing. On June 27 and 28, the Applicant sumitted
the following revised plans:
1. A revised site plan showing 146 units as rec*'mended by
the Comnission). This plan will be available for review
at the ineeting.
2. A revised floor plan for the smaller unit shawing 1138
square feet gross) and 1010 square feet net). Bedrooms
are now 12' x 15' and 12' x 13' a jog in the wall reduces
the 13' dimension to 10' for a portion of the ro*n). The
revised plan is attached.
If these revisions are acceptable, then Condition No.6 can be revised to change
900 to 1000 and reference the revised exhibit. Th the event that *uncil supports
even further reductions, then the alternatives discussed in the June 21 Staff
*rorand* to the Planning Commission can be considered.
N*: The City Attorney is recamiending that the City drop the phantan"
assessment district as a standard condition and, if that recacoendation
is folloeed, then Condition No.26 should be deleted.)
PR*ARED BY*
AICP
Lawrence L. Stevens,
Planning Director * C
Atchs: 1. June 21, 1984 *
2. June 5, 1984 Ma"o
3. May 8, 1984 Mano
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
h NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
i NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
j NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
k NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
l NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
n NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
o NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
p NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
q NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
r NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
s NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
t NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
v NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
w NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
x NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
y NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
z MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Frank M. Usher, City Manager
Date: June 29, 1984
Subject: Investment of City Funds
Presently the authorized depositories for City funds are the
California Local Agency Investment Fund and Security Pacific
National Bank. The accompanying resolutions would also
establish Palm Springs Savings Bank, Downey Savings & Loan
Association and Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan as authorized
depositories of City funds.
Earlier in the year the interest rate from L.A.I.F. was 12.159%
and bank and S & L rates were lower, which was typical for a
falling interest rate period. Currently, the LAIF rate is
10.843%, with higher rates at banks and S & L's. This is
typical of a period of rising interest rates. Of course,
liquidity remains higher at LAIF.
As I have indicated, I intend to invest $400,000, approximately
one-third of our cash balance in certificates of deposit.
$100,000 each will be deposited with Palm Springs Savings Bank,
Downey Savings & Loan, Security Pacific National Bank and Fidelity
Federal Savings & Loan at respective terms and rates of one year/
12.5%, 270 days/12.5%, 180 days/11.5%, and 90 days/12.625%. The
varying terms will help to insure future cash availability and
limiting deposits to $100,000 per institution provides for
federal deposit insurance without the necessity for collateralization.
Approval of the accompanying resolutions is respectfully
recommended.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: James Longtin, City Attorney
Date: June 27, 1984
Subject: Recommended Termination of Phantom Maintenance Districts
On the recommendation of the City Attorney's office, and commencing
with approval of the PGA West Specific Plan, the City has imposed as
a condition of tentative tract map approval the following standard
condition:
11Applicant shall consent to the formation of a maintenance
district under Chapter 26 of the Improvement Act of 1911
Streets and Highways Code, Section 5820 et seq.) or the
Lighting and Landscaping Act of 1972 Street and Highways
Code 22600 et seq.) to implement maintenance of landscaping,
pavement, and on-site lighting within all commonly maintained
driveways, parking areas, greenbelts, private streets and
other improved common ownership areas. It is understood and
agreed that appropriate homeowners' associations shall pay
all above costs of maintenance for said improved common areas
until such time as the City Council determines that, by
default of the homeowner's association, a need for maintenance
work and establishment of a tax rate exists and until such
time as tax revenues are received by the district for assess-
ment upon the real property".
This condition was formulated by myself while acting as City Attorney
of Thousand Oaks and had been continuously used by that community as a
standard condition. The condition, although establishing a maintenance
district prior to final tract map approval, would not be activated
until such time as a homeowners' association defaulted in the maint-
enance of common areas. The condition provides the City with a quick
remedy, through an already formed maintenance district, for stepping
in, performing the necessary maintenance, and charging the costs
against the benefited homeowners as per any assessment district. T*
my knowledge, no such phantom" maintenance district has ever been
activated.
As a result of my observation of the machinations and resistance to
this condition over the past few months, it is my recommendation
that it be deleted as a standard condition.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
Memorandum to City Council
Re; Termination of Phantom Maintenance Dist.
June 27, 1984
Page Two.
It is my observation that this condition has a detrimental effect
on the development process in the following two ways: 1) the
condition must be reported in the Department of Real Estate
Public Subdivision Report. The effect is to raise an issue in
the minds of prospective buyers1and their attorneys or other
advisors, as to the effect of the condition and what it could
mean to the homeowner as far as a future cost of assessment; and
2) the condition raises potential problems with lenders that are
unfamiliar with its true intent and purpose which probably
includes all lenders in this geographical area). Although the
two mentioned problems are by no means insurmountable, they have
and will continue to generate a significant amount of City staff
time explaining the purpose and ramifications of the condition,
not to mention the time and energy expended upon analysis of the
condition by prospective homeowners, lenders, and their attorneys
and advisors. When I now weigh the benefits versus the detriments
of imposing such a condition, the detriment seems to far outweigh
the perceived benefit. In as much as it is highly likely that
activation of such a phantom maintenance district will never take
place, and in as much as the City Council will have other remedies
available to it in the event of failure of a homeowners' associa-
tion to performance of maintenance on common areas, I am now
advising the Council that the imposition of the condition in the
first place was a mistake and I recommend that the condition now
be deleted.
RECOMMENDATION:
For the reasons above mentioned, it is recommended that the condi-
tion requiring the formation of a phantom maintenance district be
hereby deleted as a standard City condition and that such deletion
be retroactive to the date of its first imposition PGA West
Specific Plan approval); and that all applicants to whose projects
the condition has been applied, be notified of the deletion of the
condition and be given the opportunity to consent to its deletion
as applied to their particular project.
Respectfully sub ted,
ity Attorney
JL a]
APPROVED
*TO CONTFNT
* cIT-o/ur*c*LEET*NG\\
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
f-
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From; James Longtin, City Attorney
Date: June 27, 1984
Subject: Ordinance Establishing an Historical Society
Enclosed herewith is a proposed Ordinance establishing an Historical
Society, the terms of which are self-explanatory. Council may have
a particular interest in reviewing Section 2.19.040 setting forth
the functions, powers and duties of the Society. Also, please note
attached present Code Section 2.06.010, referenced in proposed
Section 2.19.010, setting forth the terms and procedures of
appointments to the Society.
This proposed Ordinance has been reviewed by the City Manager and
by Alice Bailes, temporary Chairman of the proposed La Quinta Histori-
cal Society. Neither have any particular concern or objection to the
proposed terms, with one exception. As you will note in the attached
minutes of the June 23rd meeting of the La Quinta Historical 5ocjety",
there was concern over the perpetuity of the organization, and the
ultimate fate of any donated artifacts and real estate in the event
of dissolution of the Society. I have explained to Alice that the
City would be the owner of donated artifacts and any final disposi-
tion decisions would be made the City Council; that the City is an
IRS sanctioned charity" for purposes of tax deductible donations;
and that if a donor was concerned about the ultimate disposition of
any property donated, he or she could stipulate that, in the event
such property was not continually used for historical purposes, the
property would revert to the donor. Either Alice, or other members
of the temporary Historical Society, may be present at your meeting
to discuss this matter further with the City Council.
RECO**ENDAT ION:
It is recommended that, unless Council desires modifications in the
ordinance following discussion, that the ordinance be introduced
first reading).
APPROVED Respectfully submitted,
*T0 CC*'T[*J.
FOR CITY COUNCIL MEETIN*
OF
ity Attorney
JL:aj CITYM A*LR
Enclosure
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To; Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Frank M. Usher, City Manager
Date: June 29, 1984
Subject: Delinquent Waste Disposal Billing Policies & Procedures
As provided in our refuse collection franchise agreement with
Palm Desert Disposal Company, delinquent fees shall annually
be placed on the property tax bill for payment. The accompanying
resolution establishes policies and procedures for such collection
and the accompanying report provides the names, addresses,
assessor's parcel numbers and amounts relative to delinquencies.
We are recommending that the Council set *:zt**7, 19B4, as the
date for a public hearing relative to the placement of the
delinquencies on the 1984-1985 tax roll.
Adoption of the accompanying resolution and the setting of a
public hearing regarding delinquencies is respectfully recommended.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To; Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
From: Frank M. Usher, City Manager
Date; June 29, 1984
Subject: Participation in the R.S.V.P. Program for Fiscal Year 1984-1985.
The accompanying agreement provides for continued participation in
the R.S.V.P. program. The share for the City of La Quinta of
*l,O12 is provided for in the budget for Fiscal Year 1984-1985,
and approval of the agreement will continue the services to the
elderly provided under this program.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approval of the agreement is respectfully recommended.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: City Manager Usher and the City Council
From: John Bund, Chairman, Traffic Safety Committee
Date: May 10, 1984
Subject: SPEED ZONING IN LA QUINTA
The recent report to the City Council from the Traffic
Safety Committee presented some recommendations relating to
speed zoning in La Quinta. The data was based on the Jan.
1983 study which was done by the Automobile Club of Southern
California.
Prior to authorizing the sheriff's department to enforce
speed zones with radar, we need to establish the City Council's
approval of those speed zones as established by the ACSC. If
the City Council wishes to modify or change those speed zones
in any manner, then we need to conduct another speed survey.
The courts will only prosecute those cases where radar
is used if a valid and current speed survey is on file with
the courts. To attempt to issue citations in non-approved
speed zones constitutes running a speed trap" and is in
violation of the California Vehicle Code. This is not wise
and hurts the city two ways: it destroys our credibility
with the court system, and it damages our relationship with
the sheriff's department.
The Traffic Safety Committee recommends the following
action from the City Council:
1. Adopt the speed survey as it presently exists ACSC
study) and authorize staff to re-sign and re-legend
those areas accordingly. This will allow court approved
use of radar for speed enforcement immediately.
2. Advise staff to conduct another speed survey via ACSC)
or contract for a private consulting firm to conduct a
separate speed survey at an unknown cost. It would then
be up to the City Council to approve the new speed survey
which would then have to be certified by the courts.
A new speed survey does not guarantee different or popular
findings on certain speed zones. It is a scientific study and
is based on factual data gathered in the field.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
A *
SPEED ZONING, cont.
Page 2
The Traffic Safety Committee also recommends that the
City Council further discuss the other recommendations from
the special report and advise the committee as to whether it
approves or disapproves of each item. This will give the
Traffic Safety Committee some direction on which to base
further actions.
The Traffic Safety Committee extends an invitation to
all City Council members to attend our meetings. This
committee exists to serve at your discretion. We are working
hard to improve traffic safety in the community. Thank you
for your continued assistance and support.
La Quinta Traffic Safety Committee
by, Douglas Brown, Secretary
La Quinta Traffic Safety Committee
APPROVED
CONTENT.
0R CITY COUNCIL WIEET*NG
APPROVED
CONTENT
CITY C5UNC*L
OF */T*TI*G
**TYMAGER
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
MEMORANDUM
CITYOFLAQUINTA
To: City Manager Frank Usher
From: Doug Brawn, Ccnnunity Safety Coordinator
Date: May 8, 1984
Subject: ADDITION* TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNAGE*GE FOR UN***CONTROLLED* *INTERSECTIONS:5*I*S
I would like to reguest that we add the attached list of presently
uncontrolled intersections to those uncontrolled intersections which
were recently approved by the City Council for traffic control signage.
The attached list oovers those intersections in[necliately east of
La Cuinta City Hall. I have rec*anded a mix of SlOP signs and YIELD
signs based on e:xtr**ly light traffic on those roads east of Washing-
ton St. and only one recorded traffic accident in that area during the
past year. We presently have 18 Yield signs on-hand at city * and we
would need six ir*)re for this proposed project. This additionally would
reguire 17 n*re stop signs.
This rneasure would probably reguire yet a:nother resolution fr*n
the City Council.
If we could include this project with the other signage project
it would be *re cost-effective in t*:::* of ordering supplies in vol*i*.
To the best of ny knowledge, this project, coupled with what has
already been approved for the *1cove'1 area, would provide traffic control
at * intersection in town.
A*PROVED
TL* CONTENT. Respectfully s**bnitted,
* *
OF Douglas Brown
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: City Manager Usher and the Honorable City Council
From: Chairman John Eund La Quinta Traffic Safety Committee
Date: June 14, 1984
Subject: TRAFFIC SAFETY COMMITTEE AMENDMENT TO RESOLUTION 83-20
La Quinta City Council Resolution #83-20 established the creation of
the Traffic Safety Committee. Since that time the Traffic Safety Committee
has served its purpose of advising the City Council on traffic safety
matters.
Due to changes in contractual services, particularly the hiring of
a Street Maintenance position within City Staff, the Traffic Safety Commit-
tee respectfully requests that Resolution #83-20 be amended to reflect
the current needs of the committee for staffing of the committee.
Section 2 of the Resolution states that there shall be one 1)
member of the Riverside County Road Department on the committee. The
committee hereby requests that Section 2 be amended to indicate that
the Riverside County Road Department position on the committee be
eliminated and that position be given to a third City Staff member.
It is desired to appoint Mr. Steve Kochell, Maintenance Worker for the
City of La Quinta to the committee. It would be appropriate for the
head of Mr. Kochell's agency the City of La Quinta) to then appoint him
to the committee per Section 5 of Resolution 83-20).
I should also like to call to the attention of the City Council that
the terms of Committee Members John Bund, Martin Beck, and A.L. Cablay will
expire on July 1, 1984 per Section 5 of Resolution 83-20). It would be
appropriate to ammend Section 5 of Resolution #83-20 to reflect terms of
appointment commencing from July 1, 1984 since the resolution as it now
stands does not do that. I
APPROVED Respe/t fully
*T0 CONTENT. */J*itted*
*0R CITY COUNCFL M*ETI*G ffi*ohund, Chairman
OF La Quinta Traffic Safety Committee
CITY M *
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
Memorandum
CITY OF LA QUINTA
To: Honorable Mayor and Meinbers of Council
From: Frank M. Usher, City Manager
Date: June 19, 1984
Subject: Fiscal Year 1984-1985 Budget Transmittal
This budget transmittal will address the following
matters:
discussion of revenues, expenditures and fund
balances.
proposed new and expanded positions.
proposed changes in salaries and benefits.
significant capital equipment.
capital improvements.
A more complete written description of the budget
will be presented before our study session regarding
expenditures.
Total projected revenue in Fiscal Year 1984-1985 is
$2,416,615, with projected expenditures being
$2,049,521. General Fund revenues and expenditures
are expected to be $1,862,371 and $1,709,833,
respectively.
In Fiscal Year 1983-1984, the projected General Fund
surplus is $639,009, with the projected surplus in
all funds being $1,283,651. By Ju*e 30, 1965, the
General Fund is expected to increase by another
$152,538, and the total balance of all funds is
expected to reach $1,650,745.
The City is in a healthy financial position.
S. L.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
Mayor and Council
1984-1985 Budget.
Page 2
Several new or expanded positions are provided for
in the budget. In Administrative Services, the part
time bookkeeper position is proposed to be full time,
with the title of Account Technician. In Public
Safety, a code enforcement officer position is added,
specifically to handle weed and nuisance abatement.
Also, a clerk-typist position is added, to handle all
necessary paperwork from the department. In Community
Development, an additional building inspector is added
for six months January June), because of the
additional building inspection load expected in 1985
and to improve the permit issuance process. The City
Engineer position is re-budgeted this year, although
I am also proposing that we bring in a consulting
engineer/public works director to review our needs
and make recommendations regarding permanent staffing.
A public information officer is not presently included
in the budget, but the position could be useful, and
we have the cost figures available for inclusion.
Regarding salaries and benefits, it has been our goal
to bring the City into a position reasonably equivalent
with the other cities of the Coachella valley. Toward
that end, it is recommended that the City pay the 7%
employees' share of the PERS contribution. This is
the standard in the other valley cities. Between
March 1983 and March 1984, the consumer price index
increased between 3.0 and 3.5%. A 3% cost of living
increase is recommended.
Several positions are proposed to have range adjustments
in order to bring them to levels in the mid-range of
similar positions with other valley cities. Other
positions are proposed fro range adjustment and/or
title change because of increased responsibility.
These positions are: Building Inspector, City Attorney,
Clerk-Receptionist, Code Enforcement Officer, Community
Safety Coordinator, Department Secretary, Director of
Administrative Services, Director of Community Development
and Street Maintenance Worker. The details of these
changes will be described more fully in the subsequent
detailed budget description and during the budget
review process. Many of these matters should be
discussed in executive session.
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
Mayor and Council
1984-1985 Budget
Page 3
Funds budgeted for significant capital equipment
include the following: two micro computers for
planning, word processing and finance applications,
two typwriters, a cash register, two communications
radios, a radar unit for use by the sheriff deputies
in La Quinta, and a utility vehicle with tractor,
trailer and equipment for street maintenance.
Funds budgeted for capital improvements include the
following: Washington/Eisenhower signal, Cove stop
sign program, Washington/Highway 111 intersection
improvement, Tampico repaving, Washington realignment,
Avenue 52 chip seal, Jefferson & Dune Palms repair
reserve, Street sign replacement program.
This will serve as a reminder that the first budget
study session, regarding revenue, will be on Tuesday,
June 26, at 2:00 p.m. The second session, regarding
expenditures, will be on Monday, July 2, at a time
to be determined.
FMU *ffi-*
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
09-28-1997-U01
01:33:22PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
07-U02
03-U02
1984-U02