Loading...
1989 01 03 CC MinutesA LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 3, 1989 Regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to order at the hour of 7:30 P.M., Mayor Pena presiding, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Council Members Bohnenberger, Bosworth, Rushworth, Sniff, Mayor Pena ABSENT: None CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Mr. Kiedrowski asked that an item be added to the Consent Calendar allowing for traffic control regulations during the Bob Hope Desert Classic. MOTION It was moved by Council Member Bohnenberger, seconded by Council Member Rushworth that traffic control regulations during the Bob Hope Desert Classic be added to the agenda, noting that the need to take action arose after publication of the agenda, to be Consent Item No. 7. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 89-1. Mr. Kiedrowski asked that Item No. 5 on the Consent Calendar be removed. ANNOUNCEMENTS At this time, the Mayor asked if any one in the audience wished to address the Council on any matter. There were no responses. PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. PUBLIC HEARING ON WEED ABATEMENTS/LOT CLEANING FOR PLACEMENT ON 1989/90 PROPERTY TAX ROLL: NEAL T. BAKER ENTERPRISES APN 773-154-015 $125.00 SONDRA L. RAUB APN 773-242-002 $125.00 SAN FERNANDO AIRPORT CORP. APN 774-283-017 $125.00 WESTERN AMERICAN CONST. CO. APN 774-142-018 $125.00 Mr. Hirdler, Community Safety Director, advised that hereinabove lots have been cleaned and the property owners have been notified of this hearing. To date, no written comments have been received. The Mayor declared the public hearing OPEN. There being no one wishing to speak, the hearing was CLOSED. BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 ACity Council Minutes 2 January 3, 1989 RESOLUTION NO. 89-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, ASSESSING LIEN AND PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION ON TAX ROLLS ON CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE. It was moved by Council Member Bohnenberger, seconded by Council Member Sniff that Resolution No. 89-1 be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. BUSINESS SESSION 1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE DEED TO THE FORMER DESERT CLUB PROPERTY FROM THE FRITZ B. BURNS FOUNDATION. Mr. Kiedrowski, City Manager, advised that in order for a public agency to receive property, it must be formally accepted prior to recordation of the deed. He recommended that the deed be accepted subject to final review of documents by the City Attorney and himself. LARRY ALLEN, P.O. Box 412, La Quinta, addressed the Council and expressed happiness with the gift of this property to the City. He urged that the City hastily spend up to one million dollars plus interest of Landmark's donation to the City to prepare this property as a City park for the benefit of all the citizens. He believed that consideration should be given to discussing with the Arts Foundation, the possibility of making this a permanent home for the Arts Festival. He thanked the City Manager for assisting with this acquisition. AUDREY OSTROWSKI, P.O. Box 351, La Quinta, also expressed happiness with this gift, as it will fill a need for the children. She asked if the property will be given with clear title, and Mayor Pena advised that it is. ANN YOUNG, P.O. Box 1384, La Quinta, President of the La Quinta Cove Association, also expressed delight with this acquisition and hoped that it will be utilized quickly. RESOLUTION NO. 89-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE DEED TO THE DESERT CLUB PROPERTY FROM THE FRITZ BURNS FOUNDATION. It was moved by Council Member Sniff, seconded by Council Member Bosworth that Resolution No. 89-2 be adopted. Motion carried unanimously. BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 ACity Council Minutes 3 January 3, 1989 2. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO CONSTRUCT CITY YARD ON AN UNDEVELOPED PORTION aF THE DESERT CLUB. Mr. Kiedrowski noted that a map has been submitted to the Council relative to a site plan for the City's Corporation Yard, to be located between the tennis courts and the Fire Station, on the Desert Club Property. He noted that there has been many complaints about the present location of the City Yard. This site would be well-screened. He added that there is $30,000 budgeted for the City Yard. The building on the site will be used for offices, storage and garage. Council Member Sniff questioned if this is the appropriate time to make this decision. He also asked if it will be screened all the way around and what the cost estimates are. Mr. Kiedrowski advised that staff has been looking at this site for over a year. Staff feels that this is the best location of the options available at this time. It will have chain-link fence all around with oleanders. Mr. Reynolds advised that a one acre site was estimated to cost $30,000 with fencing, water lines, and gravel. This site is somewhat smaller, so the cost should be less. In response to Council Member Rushworth, Mr. Reynolds advised that staff is prepared to start work on it immediately. Mayor Pena did not feel that it should wait, in light of the numerous complaints we've had about the present location. Council Member Bohnenberger suggested that the Community Services Commission be asked to look at possible use of this facility. Mr. Kiedrowski advised that it is staff's intention to come back to the Council in the next study session with a list of the items they believe the City needs to start doing with the property regardless of the eventual uses. Staff will also come back with their collective thoughts as to how we should go about sorting out the potential uses. Council Member Sniff felt that some thought should be given to appointing a special committee to review it and report back in 90 days, in order to get the community involved. PETER ZELLES, P.O. Box 786, La Quinta, confirmed that the present location of the City Yard is tenuous as the property owner has expressed a desire to sell the property. He also noted that sometimes it's difficult to conduct business due to the noise from the City Yard. In response to Council Member Rushworth, Mr. Kiedrowski advised that he will have to come back to the Council for any expenditure in excess of $10,000. Staff will be keeping the Council informed of expenses. BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 ACity Council Minutes 4 January 3, 1989 MOTION It was moved by Council Member Bohnenberger, seconded by Council Member Sniff that authorization be given for expenditure of funds for construction of a Corporation Yard based upon the plan submitted. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 89-2. 3 ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND TO FORM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 88-1 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. 4. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 88-1 AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BID. 5. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND FIXING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING PROTESTS TO PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. Mr. Reynolds, Public Works Director, advised that we have reached the point in this process where we can now start work on the improvements in the upper cove, i.e., street construction, curb, gutter, water line reconstruction and drainage Structures. This is Phase I of five phases. The Engineer of Work is Joe Kicak of Kicak and Associates. In addition to this work, is a proposed Assessment District for the installation of sanitary sewers and natural gas system. The actions before the Council at this time would start the formation of that District with a protest hearing scheduled for February 14th. In the event that the sewers and gas lines are protested out, the street and water improvements will proceed. JOE KICAK, of Kicak and Associates, proceeded to describe the proposed project and its boundaries. He noted that a revised Engineer's Report has been submitted to the City Clerk indicating some changes due to a re-routing of the natural gas line which now affects some parcels that were not previously affected. With regard to costs, he advised that the total cost of the project is $7,427,998 with the Redevelopment Agency picking up $4,024,371 and Coachella Valley Water District picking up $1,562,424. The balance of $2,225,017 will be spread to the property owners through the proposed Assessment District. In response to questions by Council Member Sniff, Mr. Kicak advised that the cost to the individual property owner is estimated at $1,500 for the sewer line and $820 for the gas line for a total of $2,330 for a fifty foot lot. However, he pointed out that the actual cost wont be known until the bids are received. The actual costs will be less than the estimates. The assessments will be set up for 15 years with a maximum of 12% interest, he anticipated something considerably lower than 10%. He added that the streets are going to be reconstructed. BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 ACity Council Minutes 5 January 3, 1989 In response to Council Member Bohnenberger, Mr. Kicak advised that the bids will be received about a week prior to the public hearing of protests, at which time, the actual figures, rather than these estimates will be used. Regarding the natural gas line, as connections to the gas line occur, there will be credit by the gas company for those properties which have connected. These properties will be paying for the gas line through the Assessment District and the District will receive the monies from the gas company and then pro-rate that back to the property owners. Mr. Kiedrowski pointed out that a property owner will have the option of paying all or part of the assessment within the 30-day collection period to avoid paying interest. Mayor Pena asked if anyone in the audience wished to comment. PETER ZELLES, P.O. Box 786, La Quinta, expressed concern that the costs are now almost double what they were when this proposal was first talked about. He also commented that in addition to the Assessment, there will be connection charges; user charges; and costs to abandon existing septic tanks. He questioned the cost for a home built on a double lot. AUDREY OSTROWSKI, P.O. Box 351, La Quinta, stated that she is in favor of the sewer, but expressed concern about the costs. She questioned whether or not there is a any help available to the property owners. ANN YOUNG, 77-526 Nogales, noted that a double lot has been addressed, but she was concerned about the costs for a corner lot, such as hers. She felt that there are many unanswered questions. DENISE JACKSON, 52-805 Navarro, questioned when all of the costs have to be paid, i.e. collapsing the existing tanks. She wouldn't be able to come up with these costs up front and knows of many other people who couldn't. Mr. Kiedrowski advised that no one will be required to collapse their septic tanks if they are functioning. If the tank fails, then they will have to deal with it. Regarding the costs, on a larger than 50' lot, there is a formula being proposed that does not assume that the cost will double with a 100' lot. Staff is in the process of putting together an informational meeting for the later part of January. Additionally, Mr. Kicak will be publishing a list of times he will be available in City Hall to discuss the matter with individual property owners. He added that all new homes will be required to hook into the sewer system. Mr. Kicak advised that a 100' frontage is not being assessed double a 50' lot there is a formula being used in which frontage was a factor; however a very small factor in the overall formula. As an example, a 50' frontage versus 75' frontage, there is an increase in cost of about $200 for combined gas and sewer representing about 15%. BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 ACity Council Minutes 6 January 3, 1989 Council Member Bohnenberger commented that ever since the City was incorporated, people have wanted to see improvements in the Cove. The City is putting in $7,500 worth of improvements per lot and the residents are being asked to front about $2,300 of it. In other areas of the Valley assessments for similar improvements are much higher because our Redevelopment Agency is helping with the costs. Council Member Bosworth asked if there is any relief individuals who cannot afford the assessments can apply for, or can the term be extended. Mr. Kicak advised that there is no process in the procedures to extend the term. Council Member Sniff expressed concern that the figures have changed since this project was proposed and that the final figures will not be available until the public hearing of protests. Mr. Kicak advised that after this meeting, the figures presented here will be mailed to each property owner. The final figures after the bids come in, cannot, by law, be higher than these figures presented. PETER ZELLES, did not believe that this program has been looked at thoroughly enough to be in the best economical interest of the citizens. He also expressed concern that it could be protested out in certain areas and end up being done in a hop-scotch manner. RESOLUTION NO. 89-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE INTENT TO ORDER THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN IMPROVEMENTS AND TO FORM ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 88-1 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. It was moved by Council Member Bohnenberger, seconded by Council Member Rushworth that Resolution No. 89-3 be adopted. Motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Bosworth, Rushworth, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None RESOLUTION NO. 89-4 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 88-1 AND AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR BID. BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 ACity Council Minutes 7 January 3, 1989 It was moved by Council Member Bohnenberqer, seconded by Council Member Rushworth that Resolution No. 89-4 be adopted. Passed by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Bosworth, Rushworth, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None RESOLUTION NO. 89-5 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ENGINEER'S REPORT AND FIXING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING PROTESTS TO PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. It was moved by Council Member Bohnenberger, seconded by Council Member Rushworth that Resolution No. 89-5 be adopted. Passed by the following vote; AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Bosworth, Rushworth, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None 6. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST TO MODIFY CONDITION ll TENTATIVE TRACT 21555 RELATIVE TO FULL TURN MOVEMENT ACCESS TO WASHINGTON STREET PARC LA QUINTA/BAR CON DEVELOPMENT NORTHEAST OF SAGEBRUSH AND WASHINGTON STREET. Mr. Crump, Planning Director, advised that the first phase of model construction takes access from Washington and the desire is to be able to have full-turn movements into the initial Phase I of the development. Sagebrush, which will ultimately be the main tract entrance won't be constructed as part of the first phase. The original condition precluded a median break which would mean double striping in the interim, but with this temporary provision, that it would be a broken line, allowing turning movements into this tract's entrance. Under the recommendations of the Planning Commission, this temporary median break approval will expire at the end of two years, or approval terminates upon which ever occurs first: A. Completion of model complex-sales; or B. Construction of Sagebrush; or C. At the time a raised median is installed. In response to Council Member Sniff, Mr. Crump advised that the City Engineer reviewed this matter and did not see a safety problem until such time as traffic volume increases. BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 ACity Council Minutes 8 January 3, 1989 Council suggested a periodic review with Council Member Bohnenberger suggesting a review on a semi annual basis by the Technical Traffic Committee. RESOLUTION NO. 89-6 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA GRANTING AN AMENDMENT TO APPROVAL CONDITION #11 OF CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION #88-105. It was moved by Council Member Bohnenberger, seconded by Council Member Sniff that Condition No. 11 be approved as amended to read A permanent median break shall not be permitted along Washington Street. A temporary median break may be permitted. This temporary median break approval shall be reviewed by the Technical Traffic Committee every six months, but shall expire at the end of two years, or approval terminates.......... Motion carried unanimously. 7. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES: ORDINANCE NO. 133 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE, TITLE 9, PLANNING AND ZONING, BY INSERTING THREE NEW CHAPTERS: CHAPTER 9.90 C-V COMMERCIAL VILLAGE) ZONE"; AND CHAPTER 9.183 DESIGN REVIEW"; AND BY AMENDING TWO CHAPTERS: 9.180 PLOT PLANS" AND 9.182 RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PLOT PLANS" WITH THE INSERTION OF REFERENCES TO DESIGN REVIEW. It was moved by Council Member Sniff, seconded by Council Member Bohnenberger that full reading of Ordinance No. 133 be waived and same adopted. Passed by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Bosworth, Rushworth, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None ORDINANCE NO. 134 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 9.156 AND 9.42 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE ZONING ORDINANCE) CASE NO. ZOA 88-00?). It was moved by Council Member Sniff, seconded by Council Member Bohnenberger that full reading of Ordinance No. 134 be waived and same adopted. Passed by the following vote: AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Bosworth, Rushworth, Sniff, Mayor Pena NOES: None ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 ACity Council Minutes 9 January 3, 1989 8. CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL BY BEN URMSTON OF THE DECISION OF THE FIRE MARSHALL REQUIRING SPRINKLERS IN THE PROPOSED OFFICE BUILDING TO BE LOCATED AT AVENIDA BERMUDAS AND CALLE CADIZ. Mr. Crump noted that the City Council sits as the Board of Appeals for matters concerning the Uniform Fire Code. Staff is recommending that the Council uphold the decision of the Fire Marshall. DENNIS DAWSON, Deputy Fire Marshall, advised that the City Code requires the installation of automatic fire sprinkler systems in buildings constructed for R-3 occupancies. This proposed building contains an area on the second floor which is classified as an R-3 occupancy based upon its use as an efficiency dwelling unit. This area was used in calculating total square footage which brings it to the 5,000 square feet, thus requiring sprinklers. Even though it is mixed-use occupancy, the predominate use of the building is office or B-2 occupancy 92%). WARREN JOHNSON, 35 West Orange Grove Avenue, Arcadia, Developer of the proposed building advised that they are currently on the line as far as economic feasibility as to whether or not to proceed. If they are required to install $20,000 in a sprinkler system, they more than likely would not be able to proceed. They currently have 2,786 square feet in leasable area. They were not informed when the new Fire Code was adopted. BOBBY BLAIR, Contractor, advised that this requirement would pose a hardship to the point that the building may not be built. A week ago they were advised that the permits were ready to be issued and they had their financing in place. It was only then that they realized there was a problem. His concern is that this requirement falls into a grey area in the Code and did not agree with the square footage calculations. BEN URMSTON, Architect for the project, advised that he has been working closing with City Staff for over two years. He designed this building in accordance with City Codes. Now at this late date, he is informed by the Fire Marshall that their calculations includes 448 sq. ft., which is an R-3 occupancy having no common walls with the rest of the second floor it is totally divorced from the rest of the second floor. It doesn't even have a common floor with the office areas it is above the mechanical room and restrooms. In response to Council Member Bohnenberger, Mr. Urmston advised that in his meeting with the Fire Marshall in Palm Desert, in which he inspected the plans, the Fire Marshall advised that he had no problems with them except for a minor shortfall on the hose length and he was asked to take the plans to the Fire Marshall in Indio. This was last May and he was not told at that time of a sprinkler requirement had he known, he would have re-designed the building. BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 ACity Council Minutes 10 January 3, 1989 Council Member Bohnenberger noted that in spite of the living area, there are 1,700 sq. ft. which is either covered walkway or covered parking and has nothing to do with the commercial aspect of the building. He expressed concern about the plans having been submitted so long ago and just now finding out about this requirement. He was inclined to grant the appeal, noting that there are some grey areas concerning interpretation. DENNIS DAWSON, advised that under the Code they are required to provide a safe exit from a building and until they are out from under the covered walkway, they are still within building area and he believed that the Fire Code supports this interpretation. Council Member Sniff felt that this decision is going to come down to interpretive judgement on the Council's part. He believed that the building is not in the strictest interpretation, a 5,000 sq. ft. commercial building. While he was sympathetic with the Fire Department, he felt the Council should up-hold the developer. MOTION It was moved by Council Member Sniff, seconded by Council Member Bohnenberger that the appeal of Ben Urmston be granted. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 89-3. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER. 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF DECEMBER 20, 1988. 3. APPROVAL OF FINAL TRACT MAP 23813 AND RELATED SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT LOS ESTADOS, SANTA ROSA COVE. 4. APPROVAL OF SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICES FOR THE SENIOR SKINS GAME APPLICANT: LANDMARK LAND CO. LOCATION: SANTA ROSA COVE. 5. WAIVER OF FEES FOR BOB HOPE DESERT CLASSIC. 6. DENIAL OF CLAIM OF JOHN M. CARROLL. 7. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING TRAFFIC CONTROL REGULATIONS DURING THE BOB HOPE DESERT CLASSIC. MOTION It was moved by Council Member Bohnenberger, seconded by Council Member Sniff that Consent Items 1 through 7 be approved as recommended with Item No. 5 having been removed and with Items 1 and 7 being approved by Resolution Nos. 89-7 and 89-8 respectively. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 89-4. BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 ACity Council Minutes 11 January 3, 1989 COUNCIL COMMENT Mayor Pena informed the Council that there is an artist willing to donate a sculpture to the City providing that it is displayed in public view. Mrs. Hogan, owner of Hogans Art Gallery would like to see it displayed on the island between her building and the Vino Cafe. PUBLIC COMMENT ANN YOUNG, addressed the Council regarding Ordinance No. 134 regarding pad heights and hoped that builders are watched carefully. She noted the property owner next to her built a retaining wall and put the footings on her property. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 10:00 P.M to study session upon motion by Council Member Sniff, seconded by Council Member Bohnenberger and carried unanimously. Respectfully submitted, SAUNDRA L JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02 BIB] 02-13-96-U01 03:30:37PM-U01 CCMIN-U02 01-U02 03-U02 1989-U02