Loading...
1986 06 17 CC0 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CITY OF LA QUINTA An adjourned regular meeting of the City Council to be held at the La Quinta City Hall, 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California. June 17, 1986 7:30 p.m. 1. CALL TO ORDER A. Flag Salute. 2. ROLL CALL 3. PUBLIC COMMENT This is the time set aside for citizens to address the Council on matters relating to City business. When addressing the Council, please state your name and address. The proceedings of the Council meeting are recorded on tape and comments of each person shall be limited to three 3) minutes. Persons wishing to address the Council regarding an Agenda item should use the form provided. Please complete one form for each Agenda item you intend to address and return the form to the Secretary prior to the beginning of the meet- ing. NOTE: Except for hearings, comments relative to items on the Agenda are limited to two 2) minutes. Your name will be called at the appropriate time. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS A. Communication from Soroptimist Int. of La Quinta, transmitting a $500 donation to the City towards re- establishment of the La Quinta Senior Center. B. Communication from Morgan U. Ward, Jr., Project Chairman La Quinta Golf Estates, requesting plan check and other City fees be reduced or waived. 5. COMMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS 6. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of the Minutes of a regular City Council meeting held June 04, 1986. B. PROPOSED RESOLUTION. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIF- ORNIA, APPROVING DEMANDS. C. Acceptance of Final Parcel Map No. 21120, Anden Corp. Applicant. I BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0AGENDA City Council June 17, 1986 Page Two. D. Denial of claim for general damages, Sandra Carrasco vs. City of La Quinta. E. Denial of claim for property and general damages, Arven & Madeline Kent vs. City of La Quinta and Coachella Coachella Valley Water District. F. Denial of claim for general damages, Julie Kent vs. City of La Quinta and Coachella Valley Water District. G. PROPOSED RESOLUTION. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1986, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAW OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES H. PROPOSED RESOLUTION. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO CONDUCT A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1986. 1) Motion for Adoption. ROLL CALL VOTE) 7. HEARINGS A. A public hearing regarding a Public Nuisance Abatement, encroachment in the public right-of-way, Lot 1, La Quinta Golf Estates; David G. Strutt & S.R. laquinta; Joseph Palozzi, Receiver; and George F. Kossler, Attorney for Receiver, Appellants. 1) Report from City Engineer. 2) Public Comment. 3) Council Discussion. 4) Resolution for Adoption. B. A public hearing regarding a request by Coachella Valley Television for a cable television franchise application; Palmer Communications, Inc., DBA Coachella Valley Television CVTV), Applicant. 1) Report from City Attorney. 2) Public Comment. 3) Council Discussion. 4) Resolution for Adoption. BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 * AGENDA City Council June 17, 1986 * Page Three. C. A continued public hearing regarding GENERAL PLAN AMENDME*/ NO. 86-011, a request to amend the General Plan Land Use Plan on a 154.5-acre site from High Density Residential to Mixed Use Commercial; a related request initiated by the City to designate Avenue 48 and Adams Street as the Highway 111 Bypass", and to upgrade Adams Street on the Circulation Plan from a Secondary to Primary Arterial; M.B. Johnson Properties, Applicant. 1) Report from the Community Development Department. 2) Public Comment. 3) Council Discussion. 4) Resolution for Adoption. D. A continued public hearing regarding SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 83-001, Amendment No. 3, a request to delete 63 acres and amend densities on portions of the Specific Plan to allow 1,225 dwellings and six 6) acres of commercial on 180 acres, Landmark Land Company, Applicant. 1) Report from Community Development Department. 2) Public Comment. 3) Council Discussion. 4) Resolution for Adoption. E. A continued public hearing regarding an Amendment to text of the Municipal Land Use Ordinance by adding the Special Residential Single-Family Zone", City Initiated. 1) Report from the Community Development Department. 2) Public Comment. 3) Council Discussion. 4) Ordinance for introduction. F. A continued hearing regarding CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 86-022, a request to approve a rezoning to Special Residential" to provide for General Plan and zoning consistency, located in generally the Cove area and areas east of Washington Street in the vicinity of Avenue 50 and Calle Tampico, City Initiated. 1) Report from Community Development Department 2) Public Comment. 3) Council Discussion. 4) Ordinance for Introduction, BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0AGENDA CITY COUNCIL June 17, 1986 Page 4. 8. BUSINESS SESSION A. Appointment of one 1) member of the La Quinta Planning Commission. 1) Motion for Adoption. B. PROPOSED RESOLUTION. AN RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT OF THE LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-009. 1) Resolution for Adoption. C. PROPOSED ORDINANCE. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY REFERRED TO IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 85-020. 1) Ordinance for Introduction. D. Report from the Community Development Department regarding award of Bid Specifications No. 86-003 Street Improvements on Avenue 50 and Park Street. 1) Motion for Adoption. E. Other. 9. ADJOURNMENT 1! BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 3n**440** 4 * R * C * I V E D May 12, 1986 City o* La Quinta Dear Linelle, It *ives me great pleasure to present to you and the Senior Center a check in the amount of *5OO from our club. We are onlv in our second year, and our membership only totals 19, but we all feel strongly that money earned throu*h our fund-r*isin* pro*ects should be returne* to the community as often as possible. Vie sympathize with your misfortune regardin* the fire, but know you vijil make a *`go of it" wherever you are located. We send our best wishes to you and those who work with you for a stron*er La Quinta. cordially, *Judie Nelkesian President CC. Janie **arding, Treasurer 44 P.O. BOX lOBi LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 4 BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 Ia*m?*tanftyGAo*tiotnates P.O. Box 162 LaQuinta, ca92253 JI.JF! 1 * 1*3B ITY OF LA QUINJA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPT June 12, 1986 City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: City Council Honorable Mayor Pena & Members of the City Council: Our perimeter wall and service road project you approved last December is now in Plan Check11 with your City Engineer. We respectfully request for various good reasons that plan check and other City fees be greatly reduced or waived. In order to make our project work correctly our engineers, J.F. Davidson Company, had to completely engineer the full width of the ultimate build-out of Eisenhower Drive from Washington Street to Avenida Fernando south). Because the City will not have to pay for this again it is a savings to you of many thousands of dollars. Further our self-initiated project will greatly improve traffic safety in the area. That in itself could amount to tremendous savings to the community in general by means of reduced accidents. Another basis for our request is that we are not a commercial enterprise, and thus, unable to recoup fees and other costs imposed on us by means of selling homes leasing space, or providing a business service. Finally, the citizens of La Quinta will have the benefit of a completed attractive corridor into the City that would not have been possible without the roughly 3/4 million dollars voluntarily provided by our associations members. May we hear from you soon? Sincerely, *or*U. Ward Jr- Project Chairma'n + *, I BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITy COUNCIL OF THE CI* OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING DEMANDS. BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, to approve demands as shown on the Demand/Warrant Register dated June 17, 1986. APPROVED and ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1986. MAYOR ATTEST: City Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: City Attcrney City Manager I BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0S MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA j. I.--- 4% To: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 17, 1986 SUBJECT: FINAL TRACT MAP NO. 21120 LOCATION: Northwest Portion of the Santa Rosa Cove Specific Plan Area, Approximately 3600 Feet Northwest of Eisenhower Drive from the Avenue 50 Entrance Gate. APPLICANT: Anden Corporation REQUEST: Approval to Record Tract Map No. 21120 Tract Map No. 21120 represents approximately 14.3 acres of the Santa Rose Cove Development. The tract consists of thirty-nine 39) lots two are common use lots). Requirements for installation of street, drainage, water, sewer and related improvements have been imposed on this map. A subdivision agreement and surety bonds have been provided to guarantee the required improvements. These documents are in satisfactory form. The City Engineer has certified that Tract Map No. 21120 is in substantial conformance with the tentative tract map approved by the City Council on December 17, 1985. The map complies with all provi- sions of the State Subdivision Map Act and the Municipal Land Division Ordinance, and that the map is technically correct. It is the opinion of Staff, that the items of concern on the part of the City Engineer, being minor in nature, will not affect the approval process. The conditions of approval associated with this map have been reviewed and Staff has determined that the conditions have been satisfactorily complied with. STAFF RECOMMENDATI ON The Community Development Department recommends that the City Council approve Tract Map No. 21120 and authorize the recordation of the map. BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL June 17, 1986 Page 2. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: Robert W. Weddle, P.E. Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP City Engineer Community Development Director RWW:LLS:dmv BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 Claim Against Public Entity TO City of La Quinta: Sandra Carrasco hereby makes claim against the City of La Quinta for the sum of $50,000.00 and makes the following statements in support of the claim: 1. Claimant's post office address is 52-945 Avenida Mendoza, La Quinta, California, 92254. 2. *otices concerning the claim should be sent to FESMIRE & WILLIAMS, P.O. Box 1931, Indio, California, 92202. 3. The date and place of the occurrence giving rise to this claim are April 10, *986, and at the intersection of Jefferson Street and Avenue 52, La Quinta, California. 4. The circumstances giving rise to this claim are as follows: Claimant was driving a Laidlaw school bus and was stopped at the stop sign eastbound on avenue 52 at Jefferson Street when the vehicle was rear-ended by a City of La Quinta on-duty fire engine. 5. Claimant's injuries are whiplash and back pain. 6. The names of the public employees causing the claimant's injuries are Daniel Reed Talbot and Kelly B. Zombro and Does 1-XX. cm. BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0* 7. The claim as of the date of this claim is $50,000.00. 8. The basis of computation of the above amount is as follows: Medical Expenses Incurred to Date unknown at this time Estimated Future Medical Expenses: unknown at this time Loss of Wages: unknown at this time General Damages: $50,000.00 Total unknown at this time Dated: June 4, 1986 Melanie Fesmire, On behalf of Claimant BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 RICHARD M ENGLISH A PROFESSIONAL LAW CORP RICHARD H EN G LIS H *THE VILLAGE AT INDIAN WELLS*' LOS ANGELES COUNTY OrFICES A PROrESSIONAL LAW CORP 74-947 HIGHWAY III AT COOK). TOWER SUITE C-IC *O2O EAST SECOND STREET Or CGLI*$EL INDIAN WELLS. CALIFORNIA 92210 DOWNEY. CALIFORNIA 90241 JOSEPH P LIDDY CERTIrIED SpECIALIST 6191 340-2777 1213) 923-09S6 WOR*ERS COMPENSATION APrILIATED WIT* NONALD H. HALL PACIFIC LAW OFFICES CORONA OFFICES RICHARD T ENGL*SH GROUP LEGAL SERVICES 219 EAST THIRD STREET RICHARD W POST DIANNE L LrDDY CORONA. CALIFORNIA 91720 DAN P LI COY 1714) 734-3590 WILLIAM H THON H A NY E NO LI S H LLOYD CERTIVIED PARA*EGAL June 6, 1986 City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: City Clerk Re: Claim of Arvan & Madeline Kent Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a claim and two copies in refer- ence to the above captioned matter. Please file this claim and please conform the face sheet which is also enclosed. Please return the conformed face sheet showing that the claim has been filed, in the courtesy envelope which has been en- closed for your convenience. Your anticipated courtesy and cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely yours, * IL * *.i * Cyndi Hart Secretary to Mr. English Ic Enclosures CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED ii BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 RICHARD M. ENGLI5H A PROrESSIONAL LAW CORP RICHARD N E NO LIS H THE VILLAGE AT IN DIAk WELLS'' LOS ANGELES COUNTY OrrICES A PRDrESS,DNAL LAN CDP* 74-947 HIGHWAY III AT COO*I TOWER SUrTE D-'0 8020 EAST SECOND STREET Or COUNSEL INDIAN WELLS. CALiFORNIA 92210 DOWNEY. CALiFORNIA 90241 JOSEPH P LIDDY CERT ED SPECIALIST 5191 340-2777 2131 923-0955 WORKERS' CDMPENSAT,DN ArFI*FATEC WITH RONALD N HALL PACI*iC LAW OFFICE5 CORONA OrrICES RICHARD T ENGLIS* GROUP LEGAL SE((VlCE* 2(9 EAST THI*D STREET RICHARD W POST 0 ANNE L LIDDY CORONA. CALIFORNIA 91720 bA* P LIDDY 7141 734-3590 WILLIAM N THON NARY ENGLISH LOYD CEPTIrIED PARALEGAL June 6, 1986 City of La Quinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: City Clerk Re: Claim of Julie Kent Dear Sir: Enclosed please find a claim and two copies in refer- ence to the above captioned matter. Please file this claim and please conform the face sheet which is also enclosed. Please return the con- formed face sheet showing that the claim has been filed, in the courtesy envelope which has been enclosed for your convenience. Your anticipated courtesy and cooperation is greatly appreciated. Sincerely yours, &(`**L Secretary to Mr. English Ic Enclosures CERTIFIED RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1986, FOR THE ELECTION OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA RELATING TO GENERAL LAW CITIES. WHEREAS, under the provisions of the laws relating to general law cities in the State of California, a General Municipal Election shall be held on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, for the election of Municipal Officers; and NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the laws of the State of California relating to General Law Cities, there is called and ordered to be held in the City of La Quinta, Cali- fornia, on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, a General Municipal Election for * purpose of electing a Mayor for the full term of two years; and * Members of the City Council for the full term of four years. Section 2. That the ballots to be used at the election shall be in form and content as required by law. Section 3. That the Re*istrar of Voters of the County of Riverside is authorized, instructed and directed to procure and furnish any and all official ballots, notices, printed matter and all supplies, equipment and paraphernalia that may be necessary in order to properly and lawfully conduct the election. Section 4. That the polls for the election shall be open at seven o'clock a.m. of the day of the election and shall remain open continuously from that time until s**n' o'clock p.m. of the same day when the polls shall be closed, except as provided in Section 14301 the Elections Code of the State of California. Section 5. That in all particulars not recited in this resolution, the election shall be held and conducted as provided by law for holding municipal elections. Section 6. That notice of the time and place of holding the election is given and the City Clerk of *he City of La Quinta is authorized, instructed and directed to give further or additional notice of the election, in time, form and manner as required by law. Section 7. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this Resolution and enter it into the book of original Resolutions. i1 BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS OF THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE TO CONDUCT A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 1986. WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California called a General Municipal Election to be held on November 4, 1986, for the purpose of the election of a Mayor for * of office which ends November, 1988, and for election of two Members of the City Council for a term of office which ends November, 1990. The election of a Mayor is being held pursuant to the City Council submitting the question of an elected Mayor to the qualifie electors of La Quinta, which was approved by the electors at a General Municip***Election held November 6, 1984; and, said incumbents for t',;* offices of Members of the City Council being Lawrence 0. Allen and Fred Wolff. WHEREAS, it is desirable that the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside conduct the General Municipal Election and canvass the returns of said General Municipal Election. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside is hereby requested to consent and agree to conduct a General Municipal Election for the City of La Quinta on Tuesday, November 4, 1986, for the purpose of the election of a Mayor for a term of office which ends November, 1988, and two Members of the City Council for a term of office which ends November, 1990, as above stated. Section 2. That the Registrar of Voters is author- ized to canvass the returns of the General Municipal Election. Section 3. That the City of La Quinta recognizes that additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of thisresolution and agrees to reimburse the County for any costs. Section 4. That the City Clerk is hereby directed to file a certified copy of this resolution with the Board of Supervisors and the Registrar of Voters of the County of Riverside. BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0RESOLUTION NO. 86- Section 5. That the City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this resolution and enter it into the book of original resolutions. APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1986. MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 MEMORANDUM *ji*&' 74, CITY OF LA QUINTA To: Members of the City Council From: James Longtin, City *ttorney Date: June 17, 19e6 Subject: Public Nuisance *batement. Encroachment in Public Right-of-*ay. Lot 1, La Quinta Golf Estates. The City of La *uinta and La *uinta Golf Estates Home O*ners *ssociation 4i 11 soon be constructing certain public improv- ments on and along the east side of Eisenho*er Drive adjacent to La Quinta Golf Estates. * recent engineering survey dis- closed that the masonry fence constructed on Lot I encroaches into the Eisenho*er Drive public right-of-*ay. Such en- croachment is illegal, and if it in fact e*ists *ould con- stitute a public nuisance, and must be removed prior to con-- struction of the ne*ly installed public improvements. On May 6th I prepared a letter, signed by the City Engineer, advising the record o*ners of the existence of the encroach-- ment and requesting removal. *ttorney George Kossler, repre- senting a Receiver to retrieve title to Lot 1, responded by letter dated May 13th. *s you *ill note in the letter, he is charged *ith retrieving title on behalf of the real o*n*r of the lot and the matter is currently in litigation and they are unable to comply *ith the City's request to remove the encroachment. Because of the foregoing, it is necessary for the City to de- clare this encroachment to be a public nuisance and order its removal. If the fence encroachment is not then removed, th* City is authorized to remove and charge the cost of abatement against the property. The proper action is for the City to conduct a public hearing, receive a staff report, hear all interested parties, and thereafter, if appropriate, adopt th* enclosed resolution. Resp ly submitted, J e Longtin i *ttorney JL: jd BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 k * * S. 7B 105 CAL LE ESTADO LA QUINTA, CALI*0RNIA 92253 619) 564.2246 May 21, 19e6 George F. Kossler 610 South Belardo Road Suite 1400 Palm Sprin*s, C* 92264 Re.* Lot 1, La Ouinta Golf Estates #1. *batement of Public Nuisance Dear Mr. Kossler: Your letter of May 12th to our City Engineer, Robert Weddle, has been referred to this office for response. It is my understanding from your letter that it will be some time until you are finally able to restore title to the proper owner and you are presently unable to take any action to correct the fence encroachment which constitutes a public nuisance. You did state that you will take whatever action you can to expedite the resolution of this matter so as not to impede our construction project. We thank you for your offer to do what you can to expedite and we understand why you are unable to act to correct the nuisance at this time. Because of your inability to act, *e must take the proper and necessary action to declare this matter a public nuisance by the City Council and to order th* abatement thereof by the owner, and in the alternative, by City action. *ccordingly, you will shortly receive a notice of hearing regarding abatement of the nuisance, which ShoLild be self-explanatory. If you have any further questions on this matter or relative to our procedures in correcting this problem, please contact my office or the City Engineer. JL: jd MAILING ADDRESS P.O. BOX 1504. LA DUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0! NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0" NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0# NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0$ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0% NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0& NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0' NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0( MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA To Members of the City Council From. Jim Longtin, City *ttorney Date. May 16, 1986 Subjeci Re: CVTV Cable TV Franchise *pp!1c*a*tion. *na.Iysis of Federal and Local *uthor1ty. Palmer Communications, Inc. DB* Coachella Valley Television CVTV), has applied for a franchise to operate a cable television system within the city of La *uinta. CVTV has maintained slich * system within the area now incorporated as the City of t*a Oiiinta since 1965, pursuant to a 25 year franchise issued by the CoLLnty of Riverside on 8/30/65. The county franchise was renewed by the county as to the unincorporated territory on May 22, 19e4. The county could not, of course, renew on behalf of the newly inror* porated City of La Ouinta and that franchise will expire in 1990. CVTV has been operating in the La Quinta area since 1965 and is the only C*TV provider in La Quinta at this time. During the 1960's and 1970's, regulation of cable television was almost entirely at the local municipal level. Thus, cities have the authority to regulate, by franchise, almost every aspect of C*TV including quality standards of transmission and constimer rate regulation. The law regarding municipal regulation of c*b1e changed dramatically in the 1990*s throu*h 1 court victorie* by the cable TV industry in first amendment free speech) bas*d l*w suits challenging the constitutionality of local government r Pgti- lation of cable TV and 2) federal control over certain aspects of cable TV by the FCC persuant to the Cable Communication Policy *ct of 1984. Cities still have important powers and interests to pro- tect in the regulatory process, and these interests have been con firmed by the recent Federal legislation. Cities have the st*tii- tory authority to establish requirements for system capacity, con- sumer protection procedures, local access channels and financial aid, and franchise fees. However, Federal law has now **reempted the cities power to specifically control quality of picture tr*ns mission by establishment of technical standards at variance to those established by the FCC; and cities have generally lost the power to regulate rates and charges for cable service to the con- sumer. BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0)I have reviewed the proposed franchise ag*eement and the new Fed eral Cable *ct and Chapter 5.10 of the tiuniciple Code relative to cable television systems. *s a result of this review, I hav* made several revisions in the proposed franchise agreement, which have been accepted by CVTV. My primary intent is to provide a fran chise which reserves powers to the city to the full extent provid- ed under the law; yet providing a fair agreement to the cable operator providing the necessary degree of financial security and *redictability in terms of long-term planning and financing for the system. Important regulatory provi*ions are discussed below. Term and Renewal of Franchise. The agreement provides for a fif teen year term for the franchise and refers to Municipal Code 5.10.050 for provisions relative to franchise renewal. This s*c tion of the municipal code itself provides for a fifteen year tern for the franchise and provides that the franchisee may apply for renewal for unlimited additional terms of fifteen years* which renewal shall not be unreasonably withheld if the franchisee has substantially complied with the terms and conditions of the exist- mg franchise. In effect, this means that the franchise is grant- ed for an unli*ited indefinate period into the future so long as the franchisee substantially complies witr the franchise terms and rules. These provisions on term and renewal are in general com-- pliance with the new Federal Cable *ct. Under the *ct, cities *re required to renew the franchise unless they affirmativly demon- strate grounds for nonrenewal, which are 1) the operator has not complied with the present franchise or law; 2) service ha* been inadequate; 3) the operator does not have the wherewithal to de liver what its proposal offers; 4) the operator refuses to me*t reasonable future community needs and interests. *lso, a cit* seeking to avoid renewing an expiring franchise must rim a diff* cult legal obstacle course as far as conducting hearings in prov- ing grounds for nonrenewal. These Federal provisions relativ* to nonrenewal were the result of hard cable industry lobbying for statutory expectations of renewal since the industry makes 3 *rge capital expenditures on cable plant which is rendered nearly worthless for reuse anywhere else; thus they must have a stron* expectat ion of franchise renewal in order to aake their operat ions financially feasible for the long-term. Cities are generally pro- tected in this regard in that they retain the right to grant ad-- ditional franchises and the Federal Cable *ct itself genevally provides that the operator meet techincal specifications which ar* updated to meet state of the art improvements in the cable inciust- try. Franchise Fee. The agreement Section 3.3) provides that CYTY pay a franchise fee of 5*A of gross revenues to the city as a fran-- chise fee. This percentage is in accordance with municipal ordi nance and is the maximum allowed under federal regulations. Technical Standards Relative to Picture Quality. Sections 5.* 5.12 set forth applicable technical standards relative to picti*re quality. They generally provide that FCC standards and regula- /1 BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0*tions apply to the cable operations. Provisions are made for per-- jodic performance testing and maintenance and repair of the sys- tern. In general, CVTV is required to meet or e*ceed federal standards and to provide a cable service and picture quality that is continually State of the *rt." 6ys*tem Ca*ac1t*. Public, Educational, and Governmental *ccess. VTV is required to provide a minimum of 32 activated channels in a system capable of carrying 54 channels and the full FM broadcast band, at ultimate capacity. Section 5.2 L 5.10) Under the Ytew cable act, cities have authority to ask for, and enforce, dedi-- cation of channel space to various local access uses, and certain types of financial aid to local access programming. Cities may require any number of channels, with the proviso that cable oper- ators may utilize those public educational and government channe*s not actually being programmed by local access users. The *grPe-- ment provides for one channel for government access and another channel for educational access Channel 35 L 36, per Section 6.]). CUTY agrees to maintain and operate a color equiped studio with full capability for live programming within the service area of the system and to make such facilities available at no char*e for cable casting local government, educational and public affairs programming Section 5.5). *dditionally, CUTY will designate an organization to serve as the local or valley wide entity to pm mote and supervise the production of local programming in the ser- vice area of the system and will provide financial support in thr sum of $1,000.00 per year for public benifit programming to be allocated by the access channel manager. Consumer Protection Procedures Subscriber Comp1a!nt*s). The con- sumer protection sections of the Federal Cable *ct provides th*t cities may require procedures to guarantee good customer se* vice. It authorizes municipalities to do a number of important things. It allows franchise provisions related to interrLipt ion of service, disconnection, rebates and credits to consumers, complaint re sponse procedures and deadlines, construction deadlines, *nd bonds or letters of credit to guarantee performance of any constr*iction and service commitments made by the operator. The agreeni*nt h*s been amended to incorporate the provisions of Municipal Code 5.10.030 C relative to subscriber complaints. CUTY is required to limit system failures to mininum time duration and correct mal-- functioning promptly but in no event longer than 2* hours *fter occurrence; and, upon a complaint by a subscriber, demonstrate that a signal is being delivered which is sufficient strength and qLI*l- ity to meet required standards. Other provisions are made real--- tive to efficient service; prompt repairs; office within fift***i miles of the city; manned on a 24-hour day toll-free telephone service basis; and, keeping a written log of customer com*'laints which is available to the city upon inspection. BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0+ The franchise agreement has been revie*ed in detail and compared against Federal and local regulations. It is a fair document that provides CVTV *ith resonable economic e*pections relative to thpir capital system investment and provides the city *ith maximum con*- trol in accord *ith the Federal Cable *ct of 1*84. It is reco*- mended that the agreement be approved by ordinance. Respectively submitted, gs*tin, * JL: 3d BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0, NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0- NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0. NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0/ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 00 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 01 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 02 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 03 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 04 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 05 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 06 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 07 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 08 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 09 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0: NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0; NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0< NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0= NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0> NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0? NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0@ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0A NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0B NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0C NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0D NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0F NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0G NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0H NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0I NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0J NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0K NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0L NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0M NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0N NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0O NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0P NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0Q NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0R NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0S NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0T NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0U NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0V NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0W NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0X NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0Y NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0Z NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0[ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0\ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0] NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0^ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0_ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0a NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0b NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0c NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0d NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0e NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0f NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0g NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0h NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0i NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0j MEMORANDUM CITV OF LA QUINTA TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 17, 1986 SUBJECT: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-011 CONTINUED) LOCATION: Northeast Corner of Washington Street and the Avenue 48 Alignment APPLICANT: M. B. Johnson Properties REQUEST: Amend the General Plan Land Use Plan on a 154.5-Acre Site from High Density Residential to Mixed Use Commercial. A Related Request Initiated by the City to Designate Avenue 48 and Adams Street as the Highway 111 Bypass'1, and to Upgrade Adams Street on the Circulation Plan from Secondary to Primary Arterial. Materials prepared for the June 3, 1986 agenda packet on this matter should be brought to this meeting. No additional information on this matter has been prepared since none was requested. A resolution based on the Planning Commission recommendation has been prepared for possible Council adoption. SUBMITTED BY: Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP Community Development Director LLS:dmv Atch: Resolution fQr Adoption 7'G. BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0k NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0l NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0m NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0n NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0o MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA TO: The Honorable Chairman and Members of the City Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 17, 1986 SUBJECT: SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 83-001, AMENDMENT NO. 3 CONTINUED) LOCATION: Generally Bounded by Avenue 50 on the North, Calle Tampico and Avenue 52 on the South, Avenida Bermudas on the West, and Adams Street on the East. APPLICANT: Landmark Land Company of California, Inc. REQUEST: Approval to Delete 63 Acres and Amend Densities on Portions of the Specific Plan to Allow 1,225 Dwellings and 6 Acres of Commercial on 180 Acres. Please bring materials prepared for the June 3, 1986 agenda packet on this matter with you. In addition to the information in previous memoranda, Staff under- stands that the Applicant will also object to the following: * Conditions Nos. 8.a. and 8.b. medians, traffic analysis * Conditions Nos. 9. and 10. noise analysis Staff will discuss these and other objections in its presentation at the study session and meeting. A resolution has been prepared based on the Planning Commission recommendation to allow Council to act on this matter. SUBMITTED BY: Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP Community Development Director LLS:dmv Atch: Resolution for Adoption III BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0p NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0q NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0r MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 17, 1986 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO TEXT OF THE MUNICIPAL LAND USE ORDINANCE CONTINUED) LOCATION: City-wide APPLICANT: City Initiated REQUEST: Amend the Ordinance by Adding the Special Residential Single-Family Zone" Materials prepared for the June 3, 1986 agenda packet on this matter should be brought to this meeting. These materials include the Architectural and Landscape Standards Manuals even though they are not yet ready for adoption. No additional information on this matter has been prepared since none was requested. SUBMITTED BY: Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP Community Development Director LLS:dmv L. BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0s MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA *--- TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 17, 1986 SUBJECT: CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 86-022 CONTINUED) LOCATION: Generally the Cove Area and Areas East of Washington Street in the Vicinity of Avenue 50 and Calle Tampico APPLICANT: City Initiated REQUEST: Approve a Rezoning to Special Residential'1 to Provide for General Plan and Zoning Consistency Materials prepared for the June 3, 1986 agenda packet on this matter should be brought to this meeting. No additional inforrnation on this matter has been prepared since none was requested. SUBMITTED BY: Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP Community Development Director LLS:dmv BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0t 34 May 19, 1986 Honorable Mayor John Pena, La Quinta City Council Chairman, Tom Thornberg, Planning Commission Honorable Mayor Pena, This letter is in regard to my expiring term as Planning Commissioner. I wish to thank all of you for the 6pportunity of serving the finest City in the Coachella Valley. During my term I was instrumental in the completion of the City's General Plan, and in the improved standards for single family residential dwellings. I support architectural and landscape standards that will illustrate our commitment to the aesthetic quality of our City. I am requesting that you consider me for a*other term on the Planning Commission. I am proud to serve the Council and our City and wish to continue to do so in the future. If considered, this would be my first full term as a Planning Commissioner. I filled a vacancy in 1984. During my time on the Commisssion I have not missed a meeting. I have always been available to citizens who need information about our Planning process and I have given, and would continue to give, the extra time necessary to fulfill this important part of our City government. Again, let me thank you and all who have taught me 50 much about this vital part of our planning. Si rely, cia Moran cc: City Council Tom Thornberg, Chairman, Planning Commission BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0u NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0v NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0w NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0x NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0y NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0z NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 RESOLUTION NO. 86- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT OF THE LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN FOR GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 86-009. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has recommended approval of General Plan Amendment No. 86-009 pursuant to Section 63350 et seq. of the California Planning and Zoning Law and has transmitted the same to this City Council in compliance with Section 65354 of said Law; and WHEREAS, the City Council has held at least one public hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 86-009, as required by Section 65355 of the California Planning and Zoning Law; and WHEREAS, the establishment of a density bonus system for the provision of affordable housing in the City of La Quinta to facili- tate the goals and policies of the General Plan Housing Element is not necessary since Section 65915 of the California Planning and Zoning Law already provides for such bonuses where a developer proposes at least 25% of the housing units to be affordable to nioderate income persons; and WHEREAS, a density bonus granted for projects incorporating particularly desirable design amenities is desirable to further the goals and policies of the La Quinta General Plan; and WHEREAS, a density bonus system is appropriate to encourage the use of innovative, attractive, and imaginative designs in residential projects; and WHEREAS, quality, type, and quantity of particular residential project design amenities are a basis for determining desirability for which the density bonus applies. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby amend the La Quinta General Plan Community Development Element to establish a density bonus system for projects incorporating particularly desirable design amenities as set forth in attached Exhibit A". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk shall endorse on said General Plan Amendment No. 85-009 the date of its adoption by the City Council and the date of its approval by the Planning Commission. BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0RESOLUTION NO. 86- APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1986, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 ORDINANCE NO. 86- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY REFERRED TO IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 85-020. The City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. Section 4.10 of Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 which was adopted by reference by this City Council by Ordinance No. 5, operative August 29, 1982) and La Quinta District Official Zoning Plan Map No. 14, as amended, are further amended by rezoning from R-2-3350 to R-3, those certain parcels shown and depicted for such rezoning on the map which is attached to and made a part of this ordinance, and which attached map is labeled Exhibit A11, Change of Zone 85-020. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty 30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and, shall cause this ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. The foregoing ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this day of 1986, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: MAY 8.c ATTEST: CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT: CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0S MEMORANDUM CITY OF LA QUINTA I.--- TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Community Development Department DATE: June 17, 1986 SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID NO. 86-003 STREET IMPROVEMENTS ON AVENUE 50 AND PARK STREET The construction of street widening of Avenue 50 at the new City Park site and the park access road to the school site has been advertised for bids. The bid summary is as follows: 1. Massey Sand and Rock Co. Indio $ 138,366.00 2. Allred & Kyser Construction Palm Desert 148,439.00 3. Matich Corporation San Bernardino 151,517.00 4. E. L. Yeager Company Riverside 182,015.00 City Engineer's Estimate 175,000.00 The easement for the street access road has been received and will be recorded shortly. However, the Avenue 50 and parkland dedications have not occurred due to problems recording the parcel map. If the necessary street easements and park land cannot be secured, then the project could not be constructed as proposed. Imperial Irrigation District, while initially indicating that the power poles in Avenue 50 would be relocated in conjunction with the La Quinta Lodge/Oak Tree West pole relocation work this summer, has not provided the City with a new time line. Should the pole relocation work not occur, then Staff would recommend that we modify the project construction for the paving work, since we do not want to have power poles in the travelway of the widened street. The modified project, if necessary, would construct all the curbs and gutters, sidewalks, grading and the full access road and pave Avenue 50 to its existing width. sr BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02 0STAFF REPORT CITY COUNCIL June 17, 1986 Page 2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION Award of Bid No. 86-003 to Massey Sand and Rock Company of Indio, California, in the amount of $138,366.00, subject to the City securing the necessary street easements. PREPARED BY: APPROVED BY: Robert W. Weddle, PE Lawrence L. Stevens, AICP City Engineer Community Development Director RWW:LLS:dmv BIB] 10-15-1998-U01 03:18:35PM-U01 ADMIN-U01 CC-U02 06-U02 17-U02 1986-U02