1987 11 17 CCi^"?EA63
* **An*vI**
C*AfOF** CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California 92253
Regular Meeting
November 17, 1987 7:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER Beginning Res. No. 87-59
Ord. No. 119
a. Pledge of Allegiance
b. Roll Call
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL REORGANIZATION ELECTION OF MAYOR PRO-TEM
CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTEES CVAG COMMITTEES
SUNLINE
DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION AND
VISITORS BUREAU
BOARD OF APPEALS
PUBLIC COMMENT
COMMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
BUSINESS SESSION
1. Authorization to Call for Bids for Signalization and
Improvements at Washington Street and Avenue 50.
a) Report of Public Works Director
b) Minute Order Action.
2. Consideration of Request from Elvirita Lewis Foundation for
Extension of lease.
a) Report of City Manager
I
b) Minute Order Action.
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA3. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 115 Uniform Fire Code
COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. Receipt of Planning Commission Minutes 10/27/87
CONSENT CALENDAR
4. Award of Bid for Tree Trimming to Low Bidder Accurate
Maintenance in the Amount of $5,470.00.
5. Approval of Minutes of 10/27/87 & 11/3/87.
6. Approval of Demand Register.
ROLL CALL
STUDY SESSION ITEMS
a. Discussion of Civic Center Site
b. Discussion of Possibility of Formation of Redevelopment
Project No. 2.
C. Discussion of Possibility of Formation of Mello-Roos and/or
Assessment District.
REPORT OF OFFICERS
A. CITY MANAGER
B. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
C. COMMUNITY SAFETY DIRECTOR
D. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER
E. FINANCE DIRECTOR
F. PLANNING DIRECTOR
G. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
ADJOURNMENT
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTICE OF UPCOMING COUNCIL/COMMISSION MEETINGS
November 16, 1987 CC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
November 17, 1987 CC Regular Meeting 7:30 P.M.
November 23, 1987 PC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
November 24, 1987 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
November 30, 1987 CC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
November 30, 1987 CSC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
December 1, 1987 CC Regular Meeting 7:30 P.M.
December 7, 1987 PC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
December 8, 1987 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
December 14, 1987 CC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
December 15, 1987 PC Regular Meeting 7:30 P.M.
CC City Council
CSC Community Services Commission
PC Planning Commission
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Saundra L. Juhola, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta do
hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council Meeting
of November 17, 1987 was posted on the outside entry to the Council
Chamber, 78-105 Calle Estado and on the bulletin board at the La
Quinta Post Office on Friday, November 13, 1987.
November 13, 1987.
City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA MEMOrandum*DUM
CITY OF LA OUINTA
DATE: November 17, 1987
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: COUNCIL REORGANIZATION AND CONFIRMATION OF APPOINTEES
Traditionally, the City Council reorganizes each year in November.
Election of Mayor Pro-Tern is conducted. This may be an opportune
time for confirmation of Council appointments. These appointments
are as follows:
CVAG
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Member: Mayor Hoyle
Designee: Councilwoman Cox
ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE
Member: Councilman Sniff
Alternate: Murrel Crump
HOUSING COMMITTEE
Member:
Alternate: Murrel Crump
PUBLIC SAFETY
Member: Councilman Pena
Alternate: Roger Hirdler
EARTHQUAKE & DISASTER PREPAREDNESS SUB-COMMITTEE
Member: Mayor Hoyle Ot*
Alternate: Roger Hirdler
TRANSPORTATION
Member: Mayor Hoyle
Alternate: Frank Reynolds
SUNLINE
Board Representative: Councilman Pena
DESERT RESORTS CONVENTION & VISITORS BUREAU
Board Representative: Councilman Pena
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA UiaLLIq*
DATE AGENDA ITEM#
MEMORANDUM APPROVED DE*ED
CITY OF LA OUINTA o CONTINUED To____________
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF T*CITY COUNCIL
VIA: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FROM: FRANK REYNOLDS, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINEER
DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 1987
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION TO ADVERTISE FOR BIDS
WASHINGTON STREET AT 50TH AVENUE TRAFFIC SIGNAL
PROJECT BID NO. 87-Oil
As directed, the final bid documents for subject project have been
completed. This project will be constructed concurrently with a
separately bid street improvement project that will widen and improve
this intersection and add additional travel lanes. Due to the length
of time necessary for signal contractors to secure materials 12 to
16 weeks), we expect the intersection widening project to be
completed well before the traffic signal is operational.
The signal project's construction cost is estimated to be $85,000 and
sufficient funds are available for this budgeted project in account
number 002-4813-145-000.
RECOMMENDATION
This is to request that my office be authorized to advertise subject
project for bids.
Prepared by
Robert W. Weddle, P.E.
Project Manager
RWW:bja
cc: R. Weddle
H. Harvey
Project File
memorww. 113
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA I
DATE AGENDA ITEM
CITY OF LA QUINTA continued To
MEMORANDUM APPROVED DE*ED
TO: ThE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
VIA: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FROM: FRANK REYNOLDS, DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS/CITY ENGINE*
DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 1987
SUBJECT: AUTHORIZATION To ADVERTISE FOR BIDS
WASHINGTON STREET AT 50th AVENUE INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS BID NO. 87-012
As directed, the final bid package for the first of two Washington
Street Improvement projects is completed. This project will be
constructed concurrently with another City project that will install
a traffic signal at this intersection. The separate bidding of these
projects were structured this way in order to secure the most cost
effective bids for the City. The future second Washington Street road
improvement project will be for that area between just north of
50th Avenue to the church property.
Due to the long lead time for securing materials for signal projects
this intersection improvement project should be completed well before
the signal contractor installs the poles and controller. The bid
documents will also advise both contractors of the requirement to
coordinate their activities.
As a part of this project the oleander hedge row on Washington
Street north of 50th Avenue will be trimmed back for visibility for
the new interim stop sign as well as future visibility to the signal
heads for the future traffic signal. This project, as currently
programmed will not construct any sound walls along the west
Washington Street right of way as had been requested by some local
citizens.
Additionally, this project will fill-in" a majority of the dirt slot
that separated the old Washington Street pavement from the travel
lanes currently in use. As a vertical grade differential of some
10-inches maximum exists between the two pavement sections, a simple
pave" to fit approach does not work. Portions of the existing south
bound travel way will be reconstructed to a proper cross fall to join
the old pavement section. Disruption to traffic flow will be
mitigated by transferring the south bound traffic to the westerly
pavement area as was done last year when CVWD's contractor
constructed the sewer line bore pit in this intersection.
memorww. 112 K
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA a SIJIT* IM
AIRPOIT PARk PLAZA
PALM *i*CS, CALIFORNIA qfl*24414
*)*) 17(S32
THE ELVIR*TA LEWIS FOUNDATION 0 *1iT1[K:*(TONE1.,N(*..
323TPRFCkL*SDft
AFTOS. CALIFORNIA**3
n *oo7 408) *3322
NOV U Q 1420 NATIVIDAD ROAD
October 30, 1987 c'JY O* LA Qu**JA *
Ron Kiedrowsky
City Manager 3 DATE AGE*ITEM#
City of La Quinta
78105 Calle Estado DATE AGENDA ITEM #() APPROVED DE1*flED
La Quinta, CA 92253
P*P*OVE:D DE*ED *ONTINUED TO /* * aP*
Dear Ron: CONT*i*b*DTO
Regarding the site of our Intergenerational Child Care Center at the Avenue
50 Park in La Quinta, I understand that you met with Mark Moran, who Is
serving as our consultant, and discussed the following: In that the Desert
Sands Unified School District is in no position to pay for site
improvements, it is the responsibility of the City of La Quinta and/or the
Elvirita Lewis Foundation to pay for these considerable expenses. We are
in the process now of accumulating bids for the electrical power, water,
gas, telephone, sewage, grading, etc., and we estimate the costs to be in
excess of $80,000. The Elvirita Lewis Foundation is in no position sustain
these kinds of costs, however, we are working hard on fundraising
development. We are finding that very few wealthy people are even
Interested in listening to us once they hear that we have only a three year
lease with the city for the property. They justifiably expect that the
center would be able to continue operations for many years before they want
to put money into it.
We ask you this: If the Elvirita Lewis Foundation would agree to raise
funds to improve the site at the Avenue 50 Park for the purpose of building
and operating an intergenerational child care center--which would care for
La Quinta children and employ La Quinta senior citizens--would the city
agree to extend the one dollar a year lease to ten years with two ten year
extensions? We feel that this would be fair in that we will need to put
considerable capital into the site improvements, and our fundraising
development depends upon a stable foreseeable future for the center. Also,
since we are generally improving city property without cost to the city, we
believe that building permit fees should be waived. John Walling is
finishing the plans which we will submit for approval within two weeks.
I understand from Mark and Steve that you most generously offered to help
us as much as you could with the high costs of developing this site when we
returned the $20,000 CDBG grant. We wish to be fair and to be able to
serve the children, working parents and senior citizens of La Quinta and we
are happy that the City of La Quinta is helping us to do so.
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E
A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA AGENDA ITEM#
DAT
MEMORANDUM APPROVED oDEMlED
CITY OF LA QUINTA o CONTINUED TO_________
DATE: November 17, 1987
TO: CITY MANAGER
FROM: PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID FOR TREE TRIMMING
On November 9, 1987, the following bids were received for trimming of
547 palm trees:
Accurate Maintenance Co. $10 ea. $5,470.00
Victal Leon's Complete $15 ea. $8,205.00
RECOMMENDATION:
That the bid be awarded to Accurate Maintenance Co. in the amount of
$5,470.00.
Th?
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E!A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E"A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E#A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E$A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E%A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E&A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E'A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E(A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E)A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E*A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E+A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E,A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E-A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E.A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E/A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E0A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E1A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E2A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E3A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E4A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E5A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E6A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E7A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E8A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E9A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E:A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E;A MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FROM: WALLY NESBIT, ASSISTANT PLANNER
VIA: MURREL CRUMP, PLANNING DIRECTOR
DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 1987
SUBJECT: PRELIMINARY INDIAN SPRINGS REDEVELOPMENT STUDY AREA
Attached with this memo is the information you requested relative to
the above subject. As we discussed, the area has been redefined,
from the initial study area of 1,500+ acres, to a new total area of
443.93+ acres.. Preliminary data prepared for this area is
summarized as follows:
EXHIBIT A delineates the study area boundaries and summary data;
EXHIBIT B shows subdivided and other physically developed
properties within the study area, as defined in Section 33320.1
of the California Government Code. The subdivided vacant lots
within Indian Springs may be considered as developed for the
purpose of this study.
EXHIBIT C shows properties which could be characterized by
faulty lot layout and/or subdivision design under Section
33320.1. It should be noted that this also qualified an area as
blighted un*er Section 33032.
EXHIBIT D shows property which could be considered an integral
part of an area or areas developed for urban use. These areas
are based on the Government Code criteria for developed
properties in order to ensure consistency, and also includes the
flood control channel because the right-of-way is existing. This
is essentially similar to considering the vacant lots in Indian
Springs as developed, since they are committed to single-family
home development, while the channel is zoned W-1 and committed to
flood control. These designations are subject to interpretation
as to whether they can be considered integral'1 from a definitive
standpoint.)
MR/MEMOWN. 006 1
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E<A EXHIBIT E shows those parcels which, based upon this
evaluation, might be difficult to qualify under any of the three
criteria. I should point out here that some of the evaluation of
property is inherently subjective, and it may be that some
deletions or additions could be accommodated as the study
continues. At this time, the initial area is a best shot" based
upon the objectives of your office and overview of redevelopment
law.
A final footnote to consider is the relationship of the criteria
under Section 33320.1. In order for the project area to be
considered predominantly urbanized" it must meet one of three
criteria. One of these criteria is that 80 percent of the
privately-held land in the project area must be developed. A
consideration that needs to be looked at from a legal standpoint is
how this criterion is applied in conjunction with the two other
factors which determine predominantly urbanized land for a project
area. This initial study assumes that all three criteria can be used
independently in establishing a project area; therefore, the 80
percent requirement is not as crucial as it would be if that were the
only limiting factor in qualifying an area as predominantly
urbanized". Otherwise, based on the study boundary, approximately
288 acres would have to be privately held, developed land; within the
current study area there are only 152.1 such acres.
WN/mr
attachments
MR/MEMOWN. 006 2
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E=A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E>A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E?A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?E@A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02
i^"?EAA NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
03:45:15PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
11-U02
17-U02
1987-U02