1987 12 01 CCi^!?u r
*4[:
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California 92253
Regular Meeting
December 1, 1987 7:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER Beginning Res. No. 87-61
Ord. No. 119
a. Pledge of Allegiance
b. Roll Call
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
PUBLIC COMMENT
COMMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Continued Public Hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 86-016
Meisterlin.
a) Report of Planning Director.
b) Resolution Action.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
a. Letter from Denise vasquez regarding financial assistance for
youth sports trip to the Far East.
BUSINESS SESSION
2. Continued Consideration of Second Reading of Ordinance No. 113A
Change of Zone 87-026 Anna Hassell and Report of Planning
Commission on Appropriateness of Land Use.
a) Report of Planning Director.
b) Ordinance Action. Roll Call)
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u3. Report of Committee on Request of Elvirita Lewis Foundation
for Extension of Lease.
a) Report of City Manager.
b) Minute Order Action.
4. Consideration of Appointments to Board of Appeals.
a) Report of City Manager.
b) Minute Order Action.
5. Discussion and Consideration of Street Name Signs in the Cove.
a) Report of Community Safety Director.
b) Minute Order Action.
6. Consideration of Adoption of Emergency Ordinance Regarding
Approval Procedures for Multi-Family Residential Projects.
a) Report of Planning Director
b) Ordinance Action. Roll Call)
CONSENT CALENDAR
7. Approval of Minutes of November 17, 1987.
8. Approval of Demand Register.
9. Adoption of Resolution Granting a One-Year Extension on
Tentative Tract 21123 Generally West of Washington;
Approximately 800' South of Avenue 50.
Roll Call)
COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. Receipt of Planning Commission Minutes of 11/10/87.
STUDY SESSION ITEMS
a. Report on Status of Colmac
b. Discussion of Volunteer Fire Department
C. Discussion of La Quinta Arts Foundation
d. Discussion of City's Community Service Grant Awards Program
2
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u e. Report on Mini-Parks
f. Discussion Regarding Chamber Improvements
g. Departmental Reports
a) City Manager
b) Administrative Services Director
c) Community Safety Director
d) Economic Development Manager
e) Finance Director
f) Planning Director
1) Discussion of Joint Meeting with Planning
Commission re: village Specific Plan.
g) Public Works Director
ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE OF UPCOMING COUNCIL/COMMISSION MEETINGS
November 30, 1987 CC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
November 30, 1987 CSC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
December 1, 1987 CC Regular Meeting 7:30 P.M.
December 3, 1987 Mayor's Breakfast 7:00 A.M.
December 7, 1987 PC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
December 8, 1987 Pc Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
December 14, 1987 CC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
December 15, 1987 CC Regular Meeting 7:30 P.M.
December 21, 1987 Pc Study Session 3:00 P.M.
December 22, 1987 CC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
CC City Council
PC Planning Commission
CSC Community Services Commission
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Saundra L. Juhola, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta do
hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council Meeting
of December 1, 1987 was posted on the outside entry to the Council
Chamber, 78-105 Calle Estado and on the bulletin board at the La
Quinta Post Office on Wednesday, November 25, 1987.
Dat*d: November 25, 1987.
AUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
2
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u MEMORANDUM
CITY OP LA QUINTA AFw?.;;*7 *
To: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMD*T
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1987
SUBJECT: GPA 86-016, STATUS REPORT
APPLICANT C. W. MEISTERLIN)
BACKGROUND
The City Council first considered the subject application at their
8/4/87 meeting, forwarded with a recommendation of denial from the
Planning Commission. It was the consensus of the Council that the
Applicant be allowed time to prepare a formal development application
with additional information which would be useful in determining the
viability of the concept now displayed. The Hearing was continued to
December 1, 1987, to allow this to occur.
CURRENT STATUS
As of 10/30/87, the Applicant has submitted the following
applications and information:
1. Change of Zone Application *87-027; from R-1 and R-2-8000.
2. Specific Plan *87-010; consisting of a report with
conceptual exhibits and separate market analyses for the
apartment use and congregate care facilities.
3. A completed environmental information form.
The application has been determined incomplete at this time; a letter
dated November 25 has been directed to the applicant requesting the
following information:
Chanae of Zone:
ZONE CHANGE Providing of an 8 1/2 X 11 format exhibit, delineating
EXHIBIT nature of the request, existing and proposed *oning
designations on-site and surrounding the property in
question, and showing property dimensions, adjacent
streets and right-of-ways, and other pertinent
information.
p
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?uPROPERTY The submittal application form, signed by Mr. Carl
OWNER Meisterlin as both applicant and owner, refers to an
AUTHORIZATION attached letter see attached application copy), but no
letter has been found in the submittal.
CORRECTED Application does not reflect ownership as shown in the
OWNERSHIP submitted title report dated December 6, 1984. A
INFORMATION current report or other reasonably acceptable data is
needed to show the appropriate legal vesting.
Specific Plan:
LEVEL OF The content of the Specific Plan is such that it locks
SPECIFICITY itself into a specific concept, yet remains undefined
in that it does not specify, or propose, building,
architecture or setback standards, street right of way
standards, etc. This implies to Staff that additional
development reviews, such as parcel maps, plot plans,
etc., will be necessary to implement the proposed
specific plan. The applicant should specify the intent
of the specific plan with regards to the level of
detail submitted. At this time the plan is viewed as
conceptual; this assessment needs to be verified and/or
supplemental descriptions provided by the applicant.
PRO-FORMA As identified in the letter of 10/30/87 to the
MISSING Applicant, a pro-forms" analysis of the proposal
regarding it's projected economic performance was
reguested by Council. This was immediately identified
as missing from their application; therefore, the
attached letter was sent. Prior to the completeness
determination to date, this item is still outstanding.
Upon verification of a completed application package, the Planning
and Development Department would proceed with processing.
COUNCIL ACTION ON GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
It is the option of the City Council as to whether an additional
continuance is granted, to perfect the application package, or
whether the Council is ready to take action on the General Plan
Amendment as proposed. Some further discussion with the Applicant
may be appropriate.
Obvious alternatives for Council action on the amendment would
include:
* Approval of the amendment as originally proposed by the
Applicant;
* Denial of the amendment as recommended by the Planning
Commission;
inemown. 112
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u Tabling the matter pending a Change of Zone and Specific
Plan application reaching the Council hearing level.
In any case, the confusion concerning the owner of the property
should be resolved, before an action is taken.
Attachments:
copy of change of Zone Application
Copy of 10/3/87 letter to Applicant
cc: GPA 86-016 File
Cz 87-027 File
SP 87-010 File
x
memown. 112
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?
u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!? u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?!u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?"u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?#u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?$u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?%u MEMORANDUM
0 0
CITY OF LA OUINTA
AGENDAITE
APPROVED DEPflED
ATE AGENDA lTEM* ***ONTINUEO *
CI APP*OVED DE*ED
oCONTINUED TO___________
TO: ThE HONORABLE MA*OR AND M*ERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FR*: THE PlANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTM*
DATE: *OVEMBER 31 1987
ITEM: REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE APPROPRIATENESS
OF THE HIGH DENSITY LAND USE DESIGNATION CITY COUNCIL
ORDINANCE NO. 113A, CHANGE OF ZONE 87*26)
The Planning Commission reviewed, on October 27, 1987, the City
Council's request to study the appropriateness of the land use
designation for the 32-acre site in the southwest corner of Dune
Palms Road and Westward Ho Drive. The Cc*issioners had been
8UppliCd with both minutes and a tape of the September 15, 1987,
Council meeting on this Ratter. The Co*ission also invited
additional public input at their meeting. Connents were received
from 10 individuals. Commission discussion focused on four key
analysis questions highlighted within the memorandum prepared
by Staff.
The Planning Co*ission1 by a four-to-one vote, reco=nended
that the existing High Density Residential land use allocation
for this area remain. The decision was based upon the following
conclusions:
1. The property, as designated, is generally compatible with
the surrounding land use categories1 except, possibly1 for
the Low Density Residential land use along the eastern
boundary for which attention will need to be given to site
development techniques and boundary treatments).
2. The planned road system is capable of providing suitable
access for the land uses allocated to this area. The
existing road system, ho*ver, is underdeveloped.
3. The property is not in close proximity to existing shopping
areas or employment opportunities, but the distances to
these activities is not great in terms of urban scale.
4. The amount of designated High Density Residential property,
including the potential High Density Residential development
in the Mixed Commercial category, could exceed potential
development demand; however, no one knows for sure.
Further, the Commission indicated, for the benefit of the interested *Th
public, that any proposed project development would be reviewed
at a further public hearing. Any specific project concerns would
be addressed at that time.
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?&u c' MEMORANDUM
CITY CF LA QUINTA
To: HONORABLE CHAIRMAN * MEMBERS OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: OCTOBER 27D 1987
SUBJECT: REFERRAL FROM CITY COUNCIL ON CHANGE OF ZONE 87-026
LA QUINTA DUNES
BACKGROUND
The Commission first heard the Change of Zone request at a public
hearing on August 25, 1987. The request is to redesignate from R-1
one-family dwelling) to R-3 general residential) 32 acres of land
in the southwest corner of Dune Palms Road and Westward Ho Drive.
The new R-3 zoning designation brings the property in conformity with
the high density residential 8-16 d.u./ac.) land use classification
depicted in the General Plan. The Planning Commission at this
meeting found the zone change and the General Plan to be consistent
and approved the request. The case was then referred to the City
Council. The City Council conducted a public hearing on September 1,
1987, and introduced the ordinance for first reading. The matter
then came before City Council on September 15, 1987, for
consideration of the second reading Ordinance No.113). At this
meeting, numerous residents in the area questioned the necessity of
the Change of Zone and, in particular, high density residential
designation for this property in proximity to their single-family
homes. Eleven individuals spoke on the matter, with nine in
opposition or questioning the request, and two in support of the
change. Upon conclusion of the public comment and during discussion
by the City council, the Council continued the second reading of
Ordinance No. 113, and requested a report from the Planning
Commission concerning the appropriateness of the land use
designation1 with consideration to such items as: access road system,
proximity to shopping, surrounding development proposals; and at
Commission discretion, initiation of any General Plan Amendment
deemed necessary based upon their analysis.
MR/STAFFRPT.016 1 *-) *
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?'u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?(u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?)u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?*u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?+u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?,u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?-u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?.u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?/u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?0u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?1u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?2u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?3u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?4u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?5u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?6u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?7u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?8u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?9u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?:u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?;u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?<u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?=u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?>u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!??u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?@u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Au NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Bu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Cu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Du NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Eu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Fu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Gu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Hu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Iu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Ju NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Ku NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Lu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Mu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Nu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Ou NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Pu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Qu41
14'
MIPOIT PAR' PLAZA
I ILS IeOUlH II Cub *
PALU $P**IC* CAU*O***IA *AAl4
*1* *
THE ELVIRITA 1Ew15 FOUNDATION 0
D ****kLIS
APIOL. CALIFOR*LA
*OVO2'9B7 0
L*I* CALIFOI*LA
October 30, 1987 * *Qu**TA
Ron Kiedrowsky
City Manager 3 DATE AGENDA ITEM I
City of La Quinta
78105 Cal le Estado DATE AGENDA ITEM lo APP*OVED DE*1ED
La Quinta, CA 92253
oP *P*OVED DEN*ED 4*ONTtNuED TO I* i *
Dear Ron: CONT**b:D TO
Re9arding the site of our Intergenerational Child Care Center at the Avenue
SO Park in La Quinta, I understand that you let with Mark Moran, who is
serving as our consultant, and discussed the following: In that the Desert
Sands Unified School District is in no position to pay for site
improvements1 it is the responsibility of the City of La Quinta and/or the
Elvirita Lewis Foundation to pay for these considerable expenses. We are
in the process now of accumulating bids for the electrical power1 water,
gas1 telephone, sewage, grading, etc., and we estimate the costs to be in
excess of $80,000. The Elvirita Lewis Foundation is in no position sustain
these kinds of costs, however1 we are working hard on fundraising
development. We are finding that very few wealthy peo*e are even
interested in listening to us once they hear that we have only a three year
lease with the city for the property. They justifiably expect that the
center would be able to continue operations for many years before they want
to put money into it.
We ask you this: If the Elvirita Lewis Foundation would agree to raise
funds to improve the site at the Avenue 50 Park for the purpose of building
and operating an intergenerational child care center--which would care for
La Quinta children and employ La Quinta senior citizens--would the city
agree to extend the one dollar a year lease to ten years with two ten year
extensions? We feel that this would be fair in that we will need to put
considerable capital into the site improvements, and our fundraising
development depends upon a stable foreseeable future for the center. Also,
since we are generally i.proving city property without cost to the city, we
believe that building permit fees should be waived. John Walling is
finishing the plans which we will submit for approval within two weeks.
I understand from Mark and Steve that you most generously offered to help
us as much as you could with the high costs of developing this site when we
returned the $20,000 CDBG grant. We wish to be fair and to be able to
serve the children, working parents and senior citizens of La Quinta and we
are happy that the City of La Quinta is helping us to do so.
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?RuPage Two
Once the center ts built, a certain percentage of the placements will be
sustained by scholarships approximately $3060 per year per student)1 and
that will be the focus of our fundraising efforts in the future. This
project would benefit La Quinta citizens for many years to come.
I would be happy to discuss this with you and the *embers of the City
Council at your earliest convenience.
Sincerely,
SRARI REVILLE
Executive Director
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Su NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Tu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Uu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Vu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Wu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Xu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Yu MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
L+
DATE AGENDAITEM#
APPROVED DE*ED
To: CITY MANAGER 1. CONTINUEDTO
FROM: PLANNING DIRECTOR*
DATE: OCTOBER 28, 1987
SUBJECT: BOARD OF APPEALS ALTERNATE CONSTRUCTION
MATERIALS AND INSTALLATION METhODS) MEMBER
APPOINTMENT.
Now that Title 8 Amendments have been adopted, it would be
appropriate to return to the question of Appeal Board
appointment. As you may recall, there was some initial
discussion concerning the appointment process, but there
was not a consensus among the Council as to whether they
would generate potential appointee names, or if they wished
Staff to provide them. For this purpose, it would be most
helpful if you would poll the Council.
For your reference, the following excerpt from Ordinance
No. 114, is provided:
SECTION 2. OTHER REVISIONS TO TITLE 8. Section
8.01.030 of the La Quinta Municipal Code is amended to read
as follows:
8.01.030 Establishment of Board of Appeals. In
order to conduct hearings to determine the suitability
of alternate materials and methods of installation, a
Board of Appeals is hereby established.
1) Membership. The Board of Appeals shall
consist of five 5) members, one 1) of whom
shall be a general contractor, two 2) of whom
shall be structural engineers or architects, one
1) of whom shall be a speciality contractor, all
of whom shall be qualified by experience and
training, and one 1) of whom shall be a member
of the public who is not one of the foregoing.
Members of the Board of Appeals shall be
appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the
City Council. Each member shall comply with
applicable provisions of the Political Reform Act
of 1974, California Government Section 81000, et
seq. The Building Official shall serve as
Secretary to the Board of Appeals.
MR/MEMOMC.0l4
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?Zu I*( *
DAT*
AGENDA ITEM #
MEMORANDUM APPROVED DE?*flED
CITY OF LA OUINTA oCONTINUED TO
To: Ron *Kiedrowski, City Manager
FROM: Roger Hirdler, Community Safety Director
DATE: November 23, 1987
SUBJECT: Monument Street Markers
Staff has completed a survey of the monument street markers in the
cove. The breakdown on their condition is as follows:
Missing 57
Broken 135
Borderline 167
Good 186
There are several alternatives as to the disposition of the monument
markers.
1. Repair and paint the good and borderline categories.
It would have to be done on a limited basis due to availability
of manpower.
2. Remove and dispose.
3. Remove and place them at another location such as the park.
4. Initiate an adoption program whereby the public could adopt a
monument and place on their property.
Recommendation: Council pleasure.
RH:es
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?[u *( *
MEMORANDUM DATE AGENDA ITEM
0
* CITY CF LA QUINTA()APPROVED D*+iED
oCONTINUED TO
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF ThE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1987
SUBJECT: PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW PROCESS FOR MULTI-FAMILY
PROJECTS
BACKGROUND
The recent concern of citizens in the Westward Ho/Indian Springs
area, as well as that of the Planning Commission, relative to the
proposed 472-unit La Quinta Dunes apartment project, has prompted
the Commission to request Planning Staff to review the current
authority for processing and approval of residential projects.
At present, the only major development approval function of the
zoning and subdivision ordinances which is not required to go before
the Planning Commission at either the public hearing, business or
consent calendar level is the residential plot plan. The Planning
Director has the sole approval authority on these cases, holding a
Director's Hearing when the proposal requires public hearing,
pursuant to Chapter 9.180 of the La Quinta Municipal Code governing
plot plans.
URGENCY ORDINANCE
As was the case concerning commercial plot plans, an urgency
ordinance has been drafted, in accordance with California Government
Code Section 65858. Due to the fact that some smaller projects may
not necessitate Planning Commission review, a threshold number was
incorporated into the draft text.
In accordance with the noted Government Code section, an urgency
ordinance is effective immediately upon its adoption by City
Council, for a period of 45 days, thereafter, it expires unless
extended by the City Council. This extension must be accomplished
via a noticed public hearing and, upon its adoption, is effective
for 10 months and 15 days, which should provide adequate time for a
permanent zoning ordinance provision to be adopted.
* I I
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?\uPLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
The Planning Commission determined that an urgency ordinance was
appropriate and necessary, and, by Minute Motion, recommended that
the City Council adopt the attached Urgency Ordinance.
COUNCIL ACTION
Move to adopt Ordinance No. as an urgency measure.
Attachment: Draft Urgency Ordinance
c?A
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?]u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?^u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?_u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?`u DATE AGENDA ITEM#
APPROVED oDENlED
REPORT OF o CONTINUED TO
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
DATE: DECEMBER 1, 1987
APPLICANT: LANDMARK LAND Co.
OWNER: LANDMARK LAND CO.
PROPOSAL: TT 21123 ONE-YEAR EXTENSION OF TIME REQUEST FOR
THE FILING OF A FINAL MAP CONCERNING A 20-LOT
SUBDIVISION ON 6.74+ ACRES WITHIN THE DUNA LA
QUINTA SPECIFIC PLAN AREA
LOCATION: GENERALLY WEST OF WASHINGTON STREET; +800 FEET
SOUTH OF AVENUE 50 SEE ATTACHMENT *1)
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION: MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 4-8 UNITS/ACRE)
ZONING: R-2-8000 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLINGS, 8,000 SQUARE
FEET PER UNIT REQUIRED)
ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT: AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT SCH. *83061305)
WAS PREPARED ON THE OVERALL DUNA LA QUINTA
SPECIFIC PLAN AREA *83-001 AND WAS CERTIFIED ON
APRIL 10, 1984. THE EIR ADEQUATELY ADDRESSED THE
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH TT 21123.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
On November 5, 1985, the City Council approved the original Tentative
Tract No. 21123. The Applicant requests a time extension of one year
in which to record the final map. If approved, the new expiration
date would be November 5, 1988.
The subdivision, which creates 20 estate-type lots for the purpose of
development of custom single-family housing, is located in the Duna
La Quinta Specific Plan project. The tract is to be developed on
6.74 net acres with all lots facing north onto a portion of the La
Quinta Storm Water Channel. The proposed net project density is 2.97
units per acre, which is substantially less than that which is
currently approved for development on the site. The Duna La Quinta
Specific Plan concept approved up to five 5) units per acre,
equivalent to an ultimate gross site buildout of 40 units.
74/
NR/STAFFRPT.018 1
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?auANALYSIS:
Consistency with the General Plan: The State Subdivision Map Act
Section 66473.5) requires that a tentative map, including provisions
for its design and improvements, be consistent with the adopted
General Plan. Since the conditions of approval for TT 21123 were
adopted prior to the adoption of the La Quinta General Plan on
November 19, 1985, this review has been conducted.
Hazards Element: Policy 3.6.10 of the La Quinta General Plan
requires a site-specific noise study to be prepared for all projects
within 2,800 feet of major street centerlines. This condition should
be incorporated into the conditions of approval. With the exception
of this policy, the tract, as conditionally approved, is consistent
with the General Plan.
Consistency with the Duna La Quinta Specific Plan: The Duna La
Quinta Specific Plan has been amended three times since adoption, two
of these amendments occurred after the approval of Tentative Tract
21123 and specifically relate to this tract. They are as follows:
1. Specific Plan No. 83-001, Amendment No. 2; approval amending
six 6) acres within Duna La Quinta from
apartment/condominium land uses 13 dwellings per acre
maximum) to General Commercial; approved by City Council
November 5, 1985.
2. Specific Plan No. 83-001, Amendment No. 3; Applicant
amending the Specific Plan deleting 66 acres and
redistributing densities within the Specific Plan area;
approved by City Council June 17, 1986.
The subject tract is located within Phase 3 of the Specific Plan
area. In conjunction with the tract approval on November 5, 1985,
the City Council also approved Amendment *2 to the Specific Plan
which reduced the density on Phase 3 from five units per acre to
three units per acre, for a total of 24 units. Amendment *3, which
was approved in June of 1986 with the village Pointe project,
returned this Phase to its original density of five units per acre
maximum. Because the tract is within the Specific Plan density
limitations, is an integral part of a specific planned area, and no
revisions in land use types are involved, the request can be
considered consistent with the current Specific Plan approval. The
Applicant would have to amend the Specific Plan at a later date if
they were to increase density on other phases. Because the
difference in number of units permitted 40) and approved 24) is
minimal, a redistribution of 16 units at some further point would not
pose a potential issue.
MR/STAFFRPT.018 2 *;
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?buOTHER CONSIDERATIONS:
No amendments to the General Plan have been approved which would
substantially change the existing conditions. Some minor additional
conditions relative to landscaping and infrastructure fees are
proposed; however, staff proposes no major additions or amendments to
the existing conditions, other than revising their format to reflect
only those which still apply to the project.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. 87-016, on November
24, 1987 which recommended City Council approval of a one-year
extension of time for Tentative Tract 21123, subject to conditions as
revised.
RECOMMENDATION:
Move to adopt City Council Resolution No. granting Tentative
Tract 21123 a one year time extension subject to conditions.
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Approved TT 21123, Exhibit A"
3. City Council Resolution with conditions
73
MR/STAFFRPT.018 3
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?cu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?du NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?eu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?fu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?gu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?hu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?iu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?ju NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?ku NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?lu f* I*mi
DATE *GENDAITEM#
MEMORANDUM APPP*VD DE**
CITY OF LA OUINTA CONTI***E* TO*
To: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager
FROM: Roger Hirdler, Community Safety Director
DATE: September 21, 1987
SUBJECT: Volunteer Fire Company
Volunteer fire companies are filling a very vital need in our
city. We now have two companies operating in the city, one at *32
downtown), and one at *70 P.G.A.). The company at *32,
currently has 14 members, and *70 has 7 members.
When *32 has a response, the members go to the station and respond
to the incident in the volunteers' fire apparatus. This provides
for safety of the members and prevents congestion at the scene of
emergencies. Station *70 volunteers respond to the incidents in
their private vehicles, as the company does not have fire
apparatus.
Generally, what makes a volunteer company decline, is the increase
in paid personnel. The *volunteers will usually become
disenchanted with clean up work, as opposed to actual fire
fighting. The disenchantment could be overcome by increased
recognition by the city and other civic groups.
The biggest problem is the daytime responses, when everyone is
working. There are only two or three volunteers that work in the
city, or are able to leave their place of employment. That
usually starts the demand for paid firefighters, especially as the
city grows and occupancies are more diversified. However, the
city is in pretty good shape for now, and the foreseeable future.
If the fire losses tend to grow at a large rate, the city may have
to think about supplementing the present manning, or starting our
own fire service.
RH:es
/08
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?mu p
DATE AGENDA ITEM *
MEMORANDUM APPROVED o DENIED
o CONTINUED TO
CITY OF LA OUINTA
To: Mayor and City Council
From: John Pena, Mayor Pro-Tern
Date: November 23, 1987
Subject: Chamber Improvements
With the holiday season approaching, I would like to suggest
that the Council approve some minor improvements within the
Council Chambers. I feel that it would be in the best interest
of the City and Council. It would be timely now with our Open
House just around the corner. Specifically, I would propose
that we do the following:
1. Apply a new coat of paint
2. Replace the Podium with a smaller one
3. Remove water cooler and table to adjoining room
4. Replace existing microphones with smaller, less
obstructive ones
5. Purchase new chairs
6. Affix name tags to Dais
7. Inquire to the possibility of raising the Dais
8. Place *gendaV5 in wall holders i.e., like boxes in
Administration)
9. Such other as the Council may deem appropriate.
My reasons are simple, to add a more professional appearance
and atmosphere, and make the surroundings much more pleasant
for the public. Lets take pride in where we are and what we do.
I would like to get some feedback on this proposal at our next
Study Session.
Respectfully Submitted,
John J. Pena
Mayor Pro-Tern
G*
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?nu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?ou NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?pu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?qu MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
DATE: NOVEMBER 30, 1987
TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: SAUNDRA JUHOLA, ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: 1988 GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
Per Mayor Hoyle's request and in anticipation of the 1988
General Municipal Election, I have put together the following
information.
TERMS OF OFFICE
There will be four seats up for election in the November 1988
General Municipal Election. One is the Mayor's position and the
other three are Council positions. There is a need to align
this election so that in the future only two seats become vacant
at any one time. Government Code Section 34906 deals with this
issue and gives the governing body two options:
1. At the time the resolution calling the election is adopted,
the Council can determine that two 2) of the Council seats will
be for full four 4) year terms and the third seat will be a two
2) year term. Candidates would then file accordingly; or
2. The the Council can determine that the candidate* receiving
the lowest number of votes would receive the two 2) year term.
INITIATIVES
City Council Initiated
The City Council has until early August to place an initiative
on the ballot. This would require a simple majority of the
Council to do so.
Voter Initiated
Any citizen may circulate a petition to place an initiative on
the ballot. This initiative must be filed in the City Clerk's
office by July 1st in order for the signatures to be
verified. The petition if qualified) is then presented to the
II]
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?ru NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?su NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?tu NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02
i^!?uu The La Quinta Cove Association
P.O. Box *384
La Quinta, CA 92253
Dec. 1, 1987
Mayor William*m Hoyle
City Hal*
La Quinta, Ca. 922'53
Honorable Mayor:
The question of what the City plans on doing with regard
to the cement obelisk street signs and anti-litter signs
has once again come to the attention of the La Quinta Cove
Association.
periodically several members individually including myself)
have spoken to various Council members and City Managers
concerning these problems, but as yet we have not been ap-
prised of any *ction.
As you are aware the cement obelisks, in their present state,
are a blight on our area. They are knocked over, smeared
with graffiti, or broken.
If they are to be kept as historical objects for posterity,
we ask they be cemented into the ground, re-painted and re-
stenciled. Those which cannot be salvaged, 8hould be removed.
Only one sign post is actually needed on one of the four corners
on a street. Thus we would not require all of them in view of
the fact th*t some will have to be discarded) and unused ones
could be stored somewhere for replacement when necessary.
In addition we ask that anti-litter signs bearing penalties
be placed throughout the City of La Quinta. people using
our streets must be m*de to re*lize we will not tolerate filth.
It is time La Quintans living in the Cove begin to enjoy the
beauty of the are* not only by looking up. We want to see the
Gem of the Desert" at eye level.
Your prompt attention in addressing the above will be most
appreciated.
sincerely yours,
THE LA QUINT* COV* ASSOCIATION
Ann Youn
cc: La Quinta City Council Members
j(7
Mr. Pon Keidrowski, City Mgr.
BIB]
10-30-1998-U01
04:23:03PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
01-U02
1987-U02