1988 12 06 CCi^#O2C*OF** CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California 92253
Regular Meeting
December 6, 1988 7:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER Beginning Res. No. 88-134
Ord. No. 132
a. Pledge of Allegiance
b. Roll Call
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
PUBLIC COMMENT
COMMENT BY COUNCIL MEMBERS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Public Hearing on Change of Zone 88-036 and Concurrence with
Environmental Assessment No. 88-102: Application by T & S
Development, Inc. for Change of Zone From R-3-4000 General
Residential) to CPA Scenic Highway Commercial) on the North Side
of Highway 111 and South of the Whitewater Channel Between
Washington Street and Adams Street.
a) Report of Planning Director.
b) Introduction of Ordinance Action.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
a. Letter from Boys and Girls Club of La Quinta Regarding Former
Desert Club Facility.
000001
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
a. City Manager.
b. City Attorney.
C. Assistant City Manager
d. Administrative Services Director.
e. Community Safety Director.
f. Planning Director.
g. Public Works Director.
BUSINESS SESSION
1. Consideration of Recommendations of Community Services Commission
Regarding Anti-Drug Program and Status of 11La Quinta Beautiful"
Award Program.
a) Report of Maureen Mendoza.
b) Minute Order Action.
2. Consideration of Endorsement of Riverside County's Hazardous
Waste Management Plan.
a) Report of Planning Director.
b) Minute Order Action.
3. Consideration of Options Available Regarding La Quinta Home
Enhancement Program.
a) Report of Planning Director.
b) Minute Order Action.
4. Consideration of Request for Variance of Finish Floor Elevation
78-200 Calle Fortuna Wessman.
a) Report of Public Works Director.
b) Minute Order Action.
5. Appointment of Representative to Coachella Valley Mosquito
Abatement District Board of Trustees and Appointments to CVAG
Committees.
a) Report of Administrative Services Director.
b) Minute Order Action.
000002.
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O26. Adoption of Resolution Approving the Issuance by the La Quinta
Redevelopment Agency of its Tax Allocation Refunding Bonds,
Series 1988 and Making Certain Determinations Relating Thereto.
a) Report of Consultants.
b) Resolution Action.
7. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 131 Chg. of Zone Waldon
Financial Corporation.
CONSENT ITEMS
1. Approval of Demand Register.
2. Approval of Minutes of November 15 and November 29, 1988.
3. Acceptance of Avenue 54 and Madison for Maintenance.
4. Approval of First Time Extension for Tentative Tract 21880
William G. Young Southeast Corner of Avenida Bermudas and
Avenue 52.
* Approval of Final Tract Map 23813 and Subdivision Improvement
Agreement. *
COMMISSION/COMMITTEE REPORTS
a. C. V. Recreation and Park District.
b. Planning Commission Minutes November 8, 1988.
c. Palmer CableVision Advisory Committee.
ADJOU***T
STUDY SESSION AGENDA
Monday, December 5, 1988 3:00 P.M.
NOTE: Action may be taken on any of the following items during the
regularly scheduled Council Meeting of December 6, 1988.
1. Review of Council Agenda for December 6, 1988.
2. Discussion of City-wide Amendment to General Plan Regarding
Medium/High Density Residential.
3. Discussion of Ordinance Regulating Hillside Development.
4. Discussion of Zoning Ordinance Amendment Village At La Quinta
Specific Plan.
5. Consideration of Business of the Year" Award.
*()OO()3
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTICE OF UPCOMING COUNCIL/COMMISSION MEETINGS
December 5, 1988 CC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
December 6, 1988 CC Regular Meeting 7:30 P.M.
December 12, 1988 PC Study Session 4:00 P.M.
December 13, 1988 Pc Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
December 19, 1988 CC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
December 20, 1988 Cc Regular Meeting 7:30 P.M.
December 26, 1988 PC Study Session CANCELLED
December 26, 1988 CSC Regular Meeting CANCELLED
December 27, 1988 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
December 28, 1988 CSC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
CC City Council
PC Planning Commission
CSC Community Services Commission
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Saundra L. Juhola, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta do hereby
declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of
December 6, 1988 was posted on the outside entry to the Council
Chamber, 78-105 Calle Estado and on the bulletin board at the La
Quinta Post Office on Friday, December 2, 1988.
**December 2, 1988.
SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
000004
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 6, 1988 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: I
CHANGE OF ZONE 488-036 AND CONFIRMATION BUSINESS SESSION:
OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 488-102.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
The proposal is to change the zoning for an approximate 55 acre site
from R-3-4000 to C-P-S in conformance with the General Plan Land Use
Map. The property is located west of Adams Street and north of
Highway 111, approximately 600 feet east of Washington Street, and
south of the Whitewater Storm Channel. The Planning Commission
considered the matter on November 22, 1986, and recommended approval
of the Change of *one and Environmental Assessment.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
By minute motion, concur with Environmental Assessment *88-102,
adopting a Negative Declaration and move to introduce Council
Ordinance No. approving Change of Zone 88-036.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
Signature K11I*O*SKI, CITY MANAGER
OOOOO*9
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O20'
0%
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1988
SUBJECT: PUBLIC HEARING ITEM: CHANGE OF ZONE *88-036
APPLICANT: T & S DEVELOPMENT, INC.
OWNER: WASHINGTON LA QUINTA CENTER, LIMITED
PARThERSHI P
PROPOSAL: CHANGE OF ZONE FROM R-3-4000 TO C-P-S FOR
+55 ACRES AND CONFIRMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT NO. 88-102.
LOCATION: WEST OF ADAMS STREET, NORTH OF HIGHWAY 111,
APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET EAST OF WASHINGTON
STREET AND SOUTH OF THE WHITEWATER STORM
CHANNEL.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
This item was considered as a Public Hearing item before the
Planning Commission on November 22, 1988. The Commission
unanimously approved the request.
COUNCIL ACTION:
By minute motion, concur with Environmental Assessment No.
88-102, adopting a Negative Declaration and move to introduce
Council Ordinance No. approving Change of Zone No. 88-036
Attachments: 1. Draft Council Ordinance
2. Planning Commission Staff Report
BJ/MEMOJH. 032
000006
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS ITEM:
BOYS & GIRI CWB
November 23, 1988 OF LA OUINTA
POST OFFICE BOX 386
LA QUINTA. CALIFORNIA
92253
Mayor John Pena
City of La Quinta
78105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, CA
Dear Mayor Pena:
Pursuant to our conversation on Nov. 17, please
be advised that the Boy's* and Girl's Club of La Quinta-
would like to be considered for the use of the Desert
Club facility, if said facility is donated to the city
by the Fritz Burns Foundation.
We would request the opportunity to refurbish the
Desert Club at our expense in order to serve the
approximately 1200 youngsters of La Quinta if a lease
on this facility could be obtained by the Boys and
Girls Club at a reasonable rate.
If the Burns Foundation does not donate the Desert
Club and the property, we wish to approach the city for
a lease on a portion of the property the city now owns
at Calle Tampico and Washington. If such a lease would be
available, our intentions would be to build and operate
a Boys and Girls Club with out any financial burden to the
city government.
sincerely
Mark D. Simon
Vice Pres. Finance
Don Zaraski
President
Under Organization Auspices of Boys Clubs of Ameri9a"
f**flfl1
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 *q4*a4It*
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 6, 1988 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: Community Services PUBLIC HEARING:
Commission Recommendations
BUSINESS SESSION: I
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
The Community Services Commission has had meetings regarding a
Community Anti-Drug Program to focus on programs to make La Quinta drug
free.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Possibly expenditure of some funds for the fair".
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
See attachment for recommendations.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
K;,______
ignature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORM*OO1 ALL
00029
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 0
z
MEMORANDUM
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1988
SUBJECT: ANTI-DRUG PROGRAM
The Community Services Commission formed an Anti-Drug Task Force
which met on two occasions to discuss community involvement in
making La Quinta a drug free city. The Following individuals
participated in these meetings:
Commissioners Mendoza and Rothschild
Lt. Ron Dye, Riverside County Sheriff's Department
Jan Ryan, CAN Coordinator, Desert Sands School District
Mike Barta, Security Director1 Desert Sands School District
John Lavender, Vice President, Palm Desert Disposal
Rev. Stuart Wood, St. Andrews Presbyterian Church
Virginia Greene, Chamber of Commerce
A Representative of the Soroptimist Club
Mr. and Mrs. Cameron Marshman
On October 31st, the commission acted on the recommendations of
the Task Force and are now presenting these recommendations to
the City Council as follows:
SCHOOL ISSUES
1. MANDATORY SUSPENSION
Currently, when a student is caught selling or using drugs
on campus, there is an automatic 5-day suspension. When
the student returns to school after the five days he/she is
referred to one of the many programs depending on what the
particular circumstances are.
The Commission saw a problem with the student being
unsupervised during that five day period since in many
homes, both parents are working.
r.;C)O()30
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2! BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO.* I
MEMORANDUM
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1988
To: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
SUBJECT: LA QUINTA BEAUTIFUL AWARD
On November 30, the Community Services Commission considered the
property beautification award which the City Council wished to
make a part of the Cove Clean-Up Campaign. Following discussion
of various names for this award, the Commission voted on La
Quinta Beautiful'1.
CRITERIA
The property will be selected on the basis of improvements and
maintenance of exterior appearance including landscaping and
coloration.
ELIGIBILITY
All homeowners, renters, businesses and all other structures
will be eligible for this award.
The Commission concurred that the award would be made monthly
and with property city-wide being eligible, but will initially
be limited to the Cove for perhaps as long as a year).
SELECTION COMMITTEE
The first month's selection will be made by Martin Beck and/or
Paul Rothschild and Kay Ladner. They will meet with the Code
Enforcement Office to get ideas. Three homes will be selected
and the committee will call the other Commissioners to give the
addresses for their review. The final selection will be made at
the December 28th meeting.
In following months, nominations will be accepted from the
general citizenry. Rules for nominations will be discussed at
the next Commission meeting.
TYPE OF AWARD
The Commission decided on awarding a certificate along with a
brass plate that can be mounted on a home near the door.
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2"COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 6, 1988 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE BUSINESS SESSION:
MANAGEMENT PLAN: STATUS REPORT
AND DISCUSSION UPDATE. STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
The Plan has been prepared by and for Riverside County pursuant to
the requirements of AB2948. Adoption of this Plan by the County
requires a majority support of the plan by the incorporated cities;
however, each city may exercise an option, within 180 days of the
County's adoption of their plan, to either prepare it's own plan,
adopt an ordinance requiring land use designations to be consistent
with the County Plan, or incorporate the applicable portions of the
County Plan into the municipality!5 General Plan.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
No specific action required at this meeting; anticipate adoption of a
resolution supporting Riverside County's Hazardous Waste Management
Plan at the December 20 Council meeting.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
Sign re RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
BJ/CC#11/15 F3
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2# MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1988
SUBJECT: RIVERSIDE COUNTY HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN:
STATUS REPORT
DISCUSSION
On March 31, 1988, Riverside County submitted their Draft
Hazardous Waste Management Plan HWMP) to the California State
Department of Health Services DHS). Existing law requires
counties and cities to adopt general plans and requires
counties to adopt a solid waste management plan, the hazardous
waste portion of which is sub*ect to review by the State
Department of Health Services.
The Tanner Bill AB 2948; approved 9/30/88) authorizes a
county, in lieu of preparing the hazardous waste portion of the
solid waste management plan, to adopt a county hazardous waste
management plan pursuant to guidelines adopted by the DHS and
specifies the procedures for the preparation, revision,
adoption, approval, and amendment of these plans.
Senate Bill *477 Greene, 1987) provides, among other
requirements, that within 180 days after receiving written
notification from the DHS that it has approved the county
hazardous waste management plan, each city within that county
must do one of the following:
1. Adopt a city hazardous waste management plan containing
all of the elements required by AB 2948, which shall be
consistent with the approved county hazardous waste
management plan.
2. Incorporate the applicable portions of the approved
county plan, by reference, into the city's general plan.
3. Enact an ordinance which requires that all applicable
zoning, subdivision, conditional use permit, and variance
decisions are consistent with the portions of the
approved county plan which identify general areas or
siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities.
The following points should be noted:
BJ/MEMOWN. 013 1- OO()O3*
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2$1. These requirements do not limit the authority of any city
to attach appropriate conditions to the issuance of any
land use approval for a hazardous waste facility in order
to protect the public health, safety, or welfare, and
does not limit the authority of a city to establish more
stringent planning requirements or siting criteria than
those specified in the county hazardous waste management
plan.
2. In order for the County to adopt their HWM* the plan
requires the approval of the DHS, the county, and a
majority of the cities +50%) within the county which
contain a majority of the population +50%) of the
incorporated area of the county.
3. A city/county which has not adopted a HWMP in any form is
subject to the intervention of the State DHS, if that
city/county denies a permit for a Hazardous Waste
Management Facility; i.e., the applicant may appeal to
the State to override the local decision.
BACKGROUND
Since completion and submittal of the Draft County HWMP to DHS
on March 31, 1988, the County has been working with a Citizens
Advisory Committee and a City Liaison Subcommittee in the
effort to acquaint the cities with the HWMP and to explain
their involvement in this process. It is important to
reiterate that Senate Bill 477 Green 1987) has made it-
mandatory for all cities to either create their* own management
plan, adopt the county's plan or to create ordinances requiring
consistency with the County plan.
The initial meetings of these committees were held in May,
1988. Planning and Development Staff was assigned to represent
the City on the City Liaison Subcommittee. Appropriate plan
excerpts were distributed to the City Council and affected
departments for review and comment; the only comments which
were generated came from the Planning and Development
Department, and were sent to the County on June 8, 1988.
The County Planning Department requested and received an
extension of time, to February 1, 1989, for the submittal of
the final Hazardous Waste Management Plan HWMP) to the State,
due to the lateness in receiving comments on the draft plan
from the Department of Health Services. As previously noted,
before the County can submit their HWMP as a final document to
the DHS, the County must obtain approval of the plan from a
majority of the cities in the County.
REQUESTED RESPONSE
Through the City Liaison Subcommittee, the County has requested
that the cities endorse the County's HWMP by January 3, 1989.
At a November 29, 1988, workshop, County staff hopes to obtain
2-
BJ/MEMOWN. 013 G00036
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2% NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2& NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2' NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2) NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2* NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2+ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2, NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2- NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2. NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2/ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O20 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O21 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O22 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O23 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O24 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O25 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O26 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O27 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O28 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O29 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2: NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2; NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2< NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2= NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2> NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2@ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2B NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2C NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2D NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2E NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2F NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2G NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2H NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2I NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2J NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2KCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 6, 1988 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
OPTIONS AVAILABLE FOR THE CITY OF LA BUSINESS SESSION: *
QUINTA HOME ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Program has reached an impasse due to Housing Authority request for
administrative cost coverage.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Potential reprogramming of CDBG funds from Year 12.
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Instruct City Manager to attempt negotiations of lower administrative
costs from Riverside County Housing Authority and report back to
Council.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
Sign tu RON IEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
BJ/CC*11/15.F2 OOO()7*
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2L 0
I. * MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Department
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1988
SUBJECT: OPTIONS AVAILABLE FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA HOME
ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM
BACKGROUND
The La Quinta Home Enhancement Program provides grants up to
ceilings of $750 and $1,000 for eligible home improvements for
income-eligible households. A profile of the program is
attached Attachment *1).
The Home Enhancement Program Agreement with the Riverside
County Housing Authority was signed by the Housing Authority in
October of 1987, signed by the City between December of 1987
and February of 1988, and finally approved by Riverside County
Economic and Community Development Department in April, with
the funds being released to La Quinta in May. The Housing
Authority began work on the program in earnest in May.
By the end of June 30, 1988, the Housing Authority had
qualified six applicants, which were approved by the City and
authorized for work. To date five cases have been completed,
with a sixth case pending. Total expenditures to date have
been $4,323, with an additional $750 claim expected, for a
total expended/encumbered of $5,073. Case records are
confidential. A statistical summary of activity is provided as
Attachment *2.
The Agreement with the Housing Authority had a term ending June
30, 1988. An extension was necessary to carry the program into
the next fiscal year. On June 21, 1988, Council approved an
extension of the Agreement with the Housing Authority for an
additional year.
The response from the Housing Authority to the offered
extension of the Agreement came in the form of a letter dated
October 24, 1988), explaining the need for a revision of the
Agreement to provide for coverage of administrative costs. The
critical portions of the letter are quoted below.
When the Housing Authority's Home Improvement Program
was approached in March, 1987, to administer the City's
1-
BJ/MEMOTB.034 000076
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2M NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2N NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2O NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2P NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2Q NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2R NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2T NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2U NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2V COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 6, 1988 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
Request for Variance of Finish Floor BUSINESS SESSION: ifi
Elevation 78-200 Calle Fortuna
Wessman) CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
See attached memorandum
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY:
None
RECOMMENDATION:
Variance be granted subject to the applicable provisions of the
Municipal Code.
Approved for submission to
City Council:
RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORM*002
000086
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2W 0 0
MEMORANDUM
To: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager 7
FROM: Frank Reynolds, City Engineer
DATE: November 23, 1988
SUBJECT: 78-200 Calle Fortuna Request for Variance of
Finish Floor Elevation
The owner of the sub*e*t property has requested that he be allowed to
build at an elevation 1.5 feet lower than that*prescribed by the
Flood Insurance Rate Map FIRM). According to the FIRM, his property
is in the A3 flood zone, which would require a 3 foot pad.
The owner-builder, Mr. Randall Wessman, points out that the FIRM
under which we are operating does not take into account the new flood
control facilities which have been constructed*in the upper Cove.
CVwD*officials state that it will be at least six months before a new
FIRM is published which will account for the change which has been
made.
The City Engineer, as the Floodplain Administrator, is not empowered
under the floodplain management ordinance to grant variances. The
City Council, however, acts as an Appeal Board and may grant
variances.
In Section 8.11.060, Variance Procedures, in the Municipal Code it is
stated that generally variances may be issued for new construction
and substantial improvements to be erected on a lot one-half acre or
less in size contiguous to and surrounded- by lots with existing
structures constructed below the base flood level. As Mr. Wessman
points out in his request for a variance his situation meets those
criteria.
Therefore, it is recommended that the City Council grant the
requested variance. However, the Municipal Code also states as
*ollows:
9 Any applicant to whom a variance is granted shall be given
written notice that the structure will be permitted to be built with
a lowest floor elevation below the regulatory flood elevation and
that the cost of flood insurance will be commensurate with the
increased risk resulting from the reduced lowest floor elevation. A
copy of such notice shall be recorded by the floodplain board in the
office of the Riverside County Recorder and shall be recorded in a
manner so that it appears in the chain of title of the affected
parcel of land.'9
OOOO8*
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2X NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2Y NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2Z NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2[ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2\ 4
BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO.
ORDINANCE NO. 131
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA1 AMENDING
THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY, BY
REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY REFERRED
TO IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 88-034
WALDON FINANCIAL CORPORATION)
The City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1. The La Quinta District Official Zoning Plan
Map No. 14, as amended adopted by City Council Ordinance No.
5, operative August 29, 1982), is further amended by rezoning
from R-l-12,000/PD to R-l, those certain parcel* shown and
depicted for such rezoning on the map which is attached to and
made a part of this ordinance, which attached map is labeled
Exhibit A" Change of Zone 68-034.
SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in
full force and effect thirty 30) days after its adoption.
SECTION 3. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15
days after passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in
at least three public places designated by resolution of the
City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this
ordinance;* and, shall cause this ordinance and its
certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered
into the Book of Ordinances of this City.
The foregoing ordinance was approved and adopted at a
meeting of the City Council held on this 15 day of November,
1988, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
MAYOR, City of La Quinta
BJ/ORDCC.004 G()OO9*
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2] NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2^ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2_ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2` NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2a NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2b NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2cCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 6, 1988
AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
Acceptance of Avenue 54 and Madison Street BUSINESS SESSION:
for Maintenance PGA West)
CONSENT CALENDAR: *
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
See attached memorandum.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY:
Estimated $60,000 p-er year.
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept Avenue 54 and Madison Street at PGA West for maintenance,
except for the lighting system in the Madison Street and Avenue 54
west of Jefferson Street, said acceptance to become effective
January 1, 1989.
Approved for submission to
City Council:
41 /Y*
RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORM*002
000099
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2d MEMORANDUM
TO: Ron Kiedrowski, City Manager
FROM: Frank Reynolds, Director of Public Works
City Engineer
DATE: November 21, 1988
SUBJECT: Acceptance of Avenue 54 and Madison Street
for Maintenance
Subsequent to the initial construction of the perimeter streets at
PGA West, Avenue 54 began experiencing serious structural failures,
with the result that acceptance of both streets was withheld pending
remedial action. During the summer of 1987 the developer, Landmark
Land Company, arranged for forensic engineering services to determine
the cause of the failures.
After an extensive investigation it was found that the problems
resulted from an inadequate original design for the structural
section and actual construction which did not conform to the original
design. Several months of negotiation be*tween the City, developer,
soils engineer and the construction contractor ensued, and after
agreement was reached Avenue 54 was reconstructed to a level of
structural integrity which should have been a part of the original
design.
The reconstruction was completed on October 6, 1988, and Landmark
Land Company now has formally requested that the City accept both
Avenue 54 and Madison Street for maintenance. Madison Street did not
experience the distress which developed on Avenue 54.
The City Council should be made aware that the most immediate impact
of accepting these streets will be the need to take over the
maintenance of the mile and a half of median strips, which are a
portion of Landscaping Maintenance District No. 1. It is unlikely
that the City staff will be able to perform that maintenance
adequately with our present personnel and equipment. It is our
intention to make the attempt initially, and if we are unsuccessful
we will have to evaluate the relative economics of increasing staff
to meet the need or contracting out the maintenance.
One other matter to consider is the fact that the lighting in the
median on Madison is inoperative due to chronic vandalism. We have
received a letter from Steve Walser of Landmark Land Company giving
the City assurance that at such time that development occurs on the
east side of Madison, Landmark will repair the lighting system to the
City's satisfaction.
GUOiuu
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2e NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2f NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2gCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: De*ember 6, 1988 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21880, TIME BUSINESS SESSION:
EXTENSION *1 THE HERITAGE CLUB
CONSENT CALENDAR: A*
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
The request is to grant the initial one-year extension for Tentative
Tract Map No. 21880. On November 22, 1988, the Planning Commission
considered this matter and recommended that the time extension be
granted subject to conditions. The new expiration date on this
Tentative Tract Map approval would be October 7, 1989.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Move to adopt City Council Resolution No. 88- approving the
first one-year time extension for Tentative Tract No. 21880, subject
to the conditions contained therein.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
2 City Council:
$1
Si nature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
BJ/CC*12/06.F1
OOO1O*
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2h MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Department
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1988
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 21880, EXTENSION OF TIME *1
APPLICANT: WILLIAM G. YOUNG CRYSTAL CANYON OF LA
QUINTA A.K.A., THE HERITAGE CLUB)
OWNER: CRYSTAL CANYON OF LA QUINTA
LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF AVENIDA BERMUDAS AND
AVENUE 52 SEE ATTACHMENT #1)
PROPOSAL: FIRST EXTENSION OF TIME FOR TENTATIVE TRACT
21880, THE HERITAGE CLUB) SUBDIVIDING 417
ACRES OF A 731-ACRE SITE INTO 340 LOTS FOR
330 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES, AN 18-HOLE GOLF
COURSE AND APPURTENANT FACILITIES, WITH THE
REMAINDER OF THE SITE IN NATURAL,
MOUNTAINOUS, OPEN SPACE.
GENERAL PLAN: LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 2-4 DWELLING UNITS
PER ACRE); OPEN SPACE AND WATERCOURSE/FLOOD
CONTROL.
ZONING: R*2**20,000 MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL,
1200 SQ. FT. MINIMUM DWELLING SIZE, 20,000
SQ. FT. NET LOT AREA PER DWELLING
UNIT);R*1*++*10,000 ONE FAMILY DWELLING,
1200 SQ. FT. MINIM* DWELLING SIZE, 10,000
SQ. FT. MINIMUM LOT AREA); N*A* NATURAL
ASSETS, 1200 SQ. FT. MINIMUM DWELLING SIZE).
ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP EXTENSIONS ARE EXEMPT
FROM ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW UNDER CEQA. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS PREVIOUSLY ADOPTED
IN ASSOCIATION WITH THE ORIGINAL PROJECT
APPROVAL.
EJIMEMOWN. 016 1- b'()'O1O4
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2iPROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The current approval is for a subdivision of a 417-acre portion
of a total 731-acre site, into 330 single family lots, with
additional lots for golf course, clubhouse, landscaping and
other associated uses, including one 314-acre natural,
mountainous open space lot see Attachment *2). Overall
density of the project is 0.8 units per acre.
PROJECT BACKGROUND:
Tentative Tract *21880 was approved by the Planning Commission
on September 9, 1986, and by City Council on October 7, 1986.
Some activity relative to stormwater/drainage improvements has
occurred over portions of the site to date, primarily relative
to construction of the east portion of the La Quinta Stormwater
Control project. Some final map checking had also been
initiated in late 1986, but none of those activities were ever
fully carried through, due to a variety of reasons.
REQUEST:
The request is to extend the time in which to file a final map
to October 7, 1989. The tentative map approval currently
expires on December 6, 1988.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The subject application was considered by the Planning
Commission at their meeting of November 22, 1988. The
Commission unanimously voted to recommend that the City Council
approve the one-year extension for Tentative Tract No. 21880,
subject to conditions.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Move to adopt Council Resolution No. granting the
one-year time extension for Tentative Tract No. 21880, subject
to conditions as contained in said resolution.
Attachments: Staff Report to Planning Commission
Council Resolution No.
BJ/KEMOWN. 016 2- G*O1O5
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2j NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2k NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2l NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2n NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2o NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2p NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2q NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2r NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2s NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2t NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2v NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2w NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2x NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2y NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2z NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 *#4Q1'14,
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 6, 1988 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
Tract No. 23813 BUSINESS SESSION:
Los Es,tados at Santa Rosa Cove) CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Tract Map submitted for final approval and acceptance of easements
and right of way.
Subdivision Improvement Agreement submitted for approval and
authorization for City Manager to execute.
Map, Agreement and Improvement Plans are in substantial compliance
with the tentative map and the Conditions of Approval.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY:
None
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Final Tract Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement
Approved for submission to
City Council:
*
RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORM*002
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2K
CZTt a' LA OUZl?A
StmDzyzSzou XNPRO**1SsN* AGRBRM*?
5115 AGRIENINT, made and entered into thin Ifl?* day of November
11 88 by and between La O**inta Joint Venture * hereinafter
referred to am *SUIDIVIDER*. AND CITY 0? LA QUINTA1 a municipal
corporation of the State of California, hereinafter referred to am *CITY".
wI!nSSgThu
* UHRRE*8, the Subidivider ha. prepared and filed a final subdivimion
map of Yract * 23813 in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside,
for approval by JLe Cityi and
WHERR*S, as a condition precedent to the approval of maid map by
Ciyt. Subidivier is required to offer dedication of thome parcel. of land
intended for etreets. highways1 and other public use, and almo to
construct and install or agree to construct and install certain
improvments on said dedicated parcels, and
Ium5, Subdivider. by maid map. ham offered for dedication to
City for public use certain streetm and eamem.ntm shown on naid map* and
UHER*. as a condition precedent to the acceptance of the
dedication of uch streets and easements by City. Subdivider is required
to enter into an agrement with the City to conmtruct certain
improvements, and
IiimR*, the total cost of much improvements has been estimated by
the City Sngineer to be approximately 0- Dollars; and
IIHBI*, subdivider. by maid map, ham proposed to utilize certain
parcels of land for private mtrsetm. and also to construct and install
or agree to construct and inmtall certain inprovementS; and $
WHRRE*S. Subdivider, by said map. ha. not offered for dedication
to the City for pubic use the aforementioned private mtreets; and
VHBRK*S, even though maid private street. ahall not be dedicated
to City for public use. City desire. to insure that maid street. are
constructed to the mama standards and specifications required by City
for public streets, and
UHEREILS, the total cost of such improvements has been entimated by
the City Sngineer to be approximately S *2*.*gl*nn Dollars;
1ON, *WtBFORE. IT IS AGREED by and between the parties thereto
as follows:
1. Subdivider. at him sole cost and eppenme, shall construct and
install the street, drainage. domestic vater, sanitary sewer and other
improvements required to be constructed or agreed to be constructed as
a condition precedent to the approval of said final map and acceptance
of such streets and easements. as shown on the *Improvement Plans for
ract No. *`; a copy of wnich in now on file in the office of the
City Engiz*i*ftheroe City and which is referred to and incorporated herein
am though met forth in full.
2. 8ubdivider shall furnish to City a security. satimfactory in form
and substance to City Attomey executed by a corporation authorized to
the City. one security to be * *he q* of $325,991.00 Dollars to
tranmact surety business in the State of California on forum approved by
ammure the faithful perforxance of this Agremer*t. and one security to
be in the sum of $l*2.995.50 Dollars to ammure payment of the cost of
labor and materials for the improvements required to be conmtructed or
installed hereby.
Cu' 0129
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 6, 1988 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING BUSINESS SESSION:
COMMISSION ON THE SCOPE OF THE GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENTS STEMMING FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR:
CITY-WIDE ANALYSIS OF MEDIUM AND HIGH
DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES. STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Report of Planning Commission recommendations for General Plan
Amendment on residential densities based on Council directives.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Review and comment.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
9/ City Council:
Signature *ON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
BJ/CC*12/06.F.7 *OI3L*
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Department
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1988
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON THE
SCOPE OF THE GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS STEMMING FROM
THE CITY-WIDE ANALYSIS OF MEDIUM AND HIGH DENSITY
RESIDENTIAL LAND USES.
BACKGROUND
On September 19th, the City Council received the Staff report
on the City-wide Analysis of Medium and High Density Land
Uses. A Staff presentation was made October 17th. Council
gave direction to Staff on October 18th: Present the options
available to the Planning Commission and request from the
Planning Commission a recommendation as to the exact content of
the General Plan Amendment. It was thought advisable due to
Council membership changes to check signals1' with the Council
before proceeding with the formal General Plan Amendment
hearing. On November 21st, at their study session, the
Planning Commission discussed the options available, and at
their regular session November 22nd), the Planning Commission
offered a specific recommendation.
The results of the Planning Commission' 5 deliberation are being
forwarded for Council review and comment.
PLANNING COMMISSION INPUT
The following is an item which the Planning Commission has
offered a new approach which differs from what has been
discussed.
Density Categories Instead of' breaking the present
High Density category of 8-16 dwelling units per acre
into two categories:
Medium High" 8 12 dulac
High Density" 12 16 dulac
The Planning Commission suggested an alternative
approach: designate the 8-12 dulac category as High
Density", but allow for density bonuses up to double 24
dulac) for design excellence. A design excellence bonus
1-
BJ/MEMOTB. 033 GOO13*'
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 6, 1988 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF HILLSIDE BUSINESS SESSION:
DEVELOPMENT POLICIES AND REGULATIONS
STAFF UPDATE. CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Memorandum updates the City Council on Staff efforts regarding
development of Hillside Regulations and advises Council regarding the
proposal to create a mountain protection authority now being
discussed by CVAG.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
No action required at this time. Any further comments may be
communicated to Staff.
Submitte& by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
signatu*' * *ED*K*I, CITY MANAGER d*
BJ/CC*12/O6.F8 60013d
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF ThE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1988
SUBJECT: CONTINUED DISCUSSION OF HILLSIDE DEVELOPMENT
POLICIES AND REGULATIONS STAFF UPDATE
BACKGROUND
Following a City Council inquiry as to the extent and status of
La Quinta hillside development policies, a Staff research
report was prepared and presented at the August 1, 1988, study
session. Staff was then instructed to bring an ordinance back
to Council, based on the previously considered draft that had
been conceptually approved October 2, 1984.
Staff provided necessary updating and refinements to the 1984
draft ordinance and rescheduled the matter for Council
discussion on October 4, 1988. At that meeting, members of the
Council voiced concern regarding any development of hillside
properties.
SUBSEQUENT CONSIDERATIONS
Regulations Staff has conducted more indepth investigation
of other jurisdiction's regulations of hillside development and
has found examples of approaches to address most aspects of
hillside property use, but has not found any example of
precluding all beneficial use of privately owned hillside
properties. It would appear to be common practice to limit
development based on the percentage of slope or protection of
natural features. Justification for these limitations are
founded in physical-environmental and aesthetic concerns. Most
often development is restricted to less steep areas of property
with an average slope of 20 to 30%. In no case did Staff find
regulations precluding construction from the beginning point
toe) of the slope if it involved property under the commonly
found range of 20-30% slope.
At this point it would appear that we could tighten up the
Previously discussed regulationi and narrow the gap between
this level of regulation and the desires indicated at the last
Council meeting. Staff will continue with this effort. Staff
also needu to frame a specific set of legal questions to obtain
guidance from the City Attorney in this matter.
BJ/NENOMC. 007 1-
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2SLOPE PROPERTY OWNERSHIP
The City's General Plan contains policy language regarding
designation of slopes greater than 20%. Initial efforts of
Staff to quantify acreage and ownership of slope property used
this 20% slope figure as the point of beginning.
In a summary tally we find some 6,735 acres of hillside
property within the City and its adopted Sphere of Influence;
nearly 60% of that property is under private ownership.
ACTION BY OTHERS
Since the City Council's last discussion, the potential for the
creation of a Coachella Valley Mountains Authority" has been
reviewed by various CVAG Coachella Valley Association of
Governments) committees. See Attachment.) The special
legislation contemplated by this proposal has been continued to
December 19, 1988, for additional review by the Executive
Committee of CVAG. If such an authority were created with
property acquisition rights, it would seem to provide more of
an opportunity to carry out the Council's indicated desire than
zoning/land use regulations.
COUNCIL ACTION
No specific action is required of the City Council at this
time. Staff will continue to work with the City Attorney to
perfect a set of regulations.
The Council may, also, wish to indicate any comments or special
instructions it has for Staff.
Attachment: 1. Memo from CVAG
2- * i 4 *
BJ/MEMOMC.007
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 6, 1988 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
VILLAGE ZONING TEXT BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION: IL
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission held their Public Hearing on August 23rd,
Council's Public Hearing was September 28th, and November 15th. A
joint meeting of the City Council and Planning Commission was held
October 10th. The Hearing was continued to December 20th with a
study session for the benefit of the new Council members being held
December 5th to present issues and options.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider issues and options. Adopt Village Zoning Text with or
without described modifications at the Public Hearing on December
20th.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
/A ***L'AL'*'
Signa ure RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY
BJ/CC*12/06.F6 0146
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Department
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1988
SUBJECT: VILLAGE ZONING TEXT
I. PURPOSE OF THE VILLAGE AT LA QUINTA SPECIFIC PLAN
The purpose of this Specific Plan is to guide the development
of the Village by establishing a framework and guidelines which
will influence subsequent actions by the City of La Quinta,
agencies, developers and property owners. The Specific Plan
establishes land uses, circulation, public parking, and public
improvements for the Village, and provides development
guidelines to ensure that a high level of design quality is
achieved.
The objectives of the Specific Plan are aimed at overcoming a
series of problems and optimizing some opportunities to create
a downtown" for the City of La Quinta. Some of the problems
are:
Location: Not on major thoroughfares.
Street Network: Poorly designed traffic flow.
Surplus of Commercial
Land: Approximately twice the amount
absorbable under normal
circumstances.
No central wastewater system.
Flood Hazards
Substandard Water Distribution System.
Opportunities:
Rapid growth of the City.
Vacant land allows planning and implementation.
Attractive features: Park, Mountains.
The strategy behind the plan consists of several key elements:
1. Divide and specialize the areas of the Village so that
less direct competition is felt. Give each area a
complementary role to play.
BJ/MEMOTB. 036 1-
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O22. Attract tourists, visitors from outside La Quinta to
supplement the market which the area might otherwise
support.
3. Make the Village special: accomplish through three areas:
A. Strong emphasis on design quality supported by
design review ensuring the desert oasis theme in
the context of La Quinta's historic architectural
vernacular;
B. Pedestrian scale of development, with stronger than
normal emphasis on amenities for pedestrians such
as shade, interesting surfaces and areas,
fountains, etc.) so that shoppers and visitors
would be enticed to stay longer and spend more);
C. And an art theme, both in terms of publicly
displayed art works and in the quality of
merchandise offered in the commercial spaces,
adding an additional motivation for visitors to
seek out and return to) the Village commercial
area.
II. VILLAGE ZONING TEXT
The Village at La Quinta Specific Plan, adopted February 2,
1988, requires as a part of its implementation the amendment of
the Zoning Ordinance Title 9 of the Municipal Code) to provide
text for the Village commercial and Village Residential zones
and a Design Review chapter.
What is being proposed for adoption at present is only the
text of the Village Zoning. The amendment of the Zoning Map
to reflect the new zones will follow shortly, after the text is
fully considered and adopted.
The text of the Village Zones follows very closely both the
General Plan and the Specific Plan. Indeed, the Specific Plan
is incorporated by reference into the Village Zones, in order
to avoid repetition of the Plan.
The parts of the Village Zoning Text are:
The CV" Commercial Village Zone;
The Design Review chapter; and
Two minor amendments to the Zoning Ordinance Plot Plan
Review chapters to incorporate references to the Design
Review process.
The RV" Residential Village Zone;
2-
*uUj4*
BJ/KEMOTB.036
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02
i^#O2 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-10-1998-U01
11:49:58AM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
12-U02
06-U02
1988-U02