1989 02 07 CCi^!RS 1,
OF CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California 92253
Regular Meeting
February 7? 1989 7:30 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER Beginning Res. No. 89-14
Ord. No. 135
a. Pledge of Allegiance
b. Roll Call
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
PRESENTATIONS PRESENTATION OF LA QUINTA BEAUTIFUL AWARD TO MR.
AND MRS. MIKE TANNER, 77-320 CALLE SINALOA.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. Continued Public Hearing On Tentative Tract No. 23935
Application By Tom Noble for Subdivision of 50+ Acres Located
On The Southwest Corner Of Miles Avenue And Dune Palms Road Into
193 Single Family Lots and Concurrence With Environmental
Assessment.
a) Resolution Action.
2. Continued Public Hearing on Change of Zone 87-026 From
R-1 to R-3-5445 On 32.27 Acres Located at the Southwest Corner of
Dune Palms Road and Westward Ho Drive Applicant: La Quinta
Dunes.
Note: To be continued to February 21, 1989.
3. Continued Public Hearing on Tentative Tract No. 24026
Application by La Quinta Partners for Subdivision of 32 + Acres
on the Southwest of the Intersection of Dune Palms Road and
Westward Ho Drive Into 117 Single Family Lots and Concurrence
with Environmental Assessment.
Note: To be continued to February 21, 1989.
nnnnnl
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RSBUSINESS SESSION
1. Consideration of Resolution of Approving Annexation #3
to the City of La Quinta Property Located Northwest of
Intersection of Adams Starlight Dr.) and Fred Waring
Applicant: Rick Johnson.
a) Resolution Action.
2. Consideration of Request of Save Our Santa Rosas" Committee for
Adoption of Resolution Supporting the Preservation of the Santa
Rosa Mountains.
a) Resolution Action.
3. Consideration of Request from Robert Lamb Hart Regarding An
Improvement District Along Washington Street Corridor.
a) Minute Order Action.
4. Continued Discussion Regarding Advisory Committee for Fritz Burns
Park.
a) Minute Order Action.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of Demand Register.
2. Approval of Minutes of January 17, 1989.
3. Approval of Agreement for Use of Property on Avenue 52 for
Recreational Purposes.
4. Approval of Request for Temporary Special Advertising Device
Request is for a Cold Air Balloon at the Northwest Corner of
Jefferson Street and Highway 111 Applicant: Betty Gray.
5. Ratification of City Manager and City Engineer's Understanding on
Tentative Tract 23292 Duna La Quinta.
6. Approval of Payment of 1988/89 Assessment for Palm Springs Desert
Resorts Convention and Visitors Bureau.
COUNCIL COMMENT
PUBLIC COMMENT
ADJOURNMENT
nnnnn*
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS STUDY SESSION AGENDA
Monday, February 6, 1989 3:00 F.M.
NOTE: Action may be taken on any of the following items during the
regularly scheduled Council Meeting of February 7, 1989.
1. Discussion of Civic Center Master Plan Up-Date.
2. Status Report and Policy Framework for Highway 111 Corridor.
3. Discussion of Results of Cable Service Survey.
4. Discussion of Community Services Commission Rec,or*endation
Regarding La Quinta Beautiful" Award Program.
5. Presentation by Martin Beck for Public* Information Services.
6. Departmental Reports
a. City Manager
b. City Attorney
c. Assistant City Manager
d. Administrative Services Director
e. Community Safety Director
f. Planning Director
g. Public Works Director
7. Reports and Informational Items
a. Planning Commission Minutes of January 10, 1989.
b. C. V. Recreation and Park District
c. Sunline Transit Agency
d. CVAG Committee Reports
NOTICE OF UPCOMING COUNCIL/COMMISSION MEETINGS
February 6, 1989 CC Study Session 3:00 F.M.
February 7, 1989 CC Regular Meeting 7:30 F.M.
February 13, 1989 PC Study Session 4:00 P.M.
February 14, 1989 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 F.M.
February 14, 1989 CC Adjourned Meeting 7:30 P.M.
February 20, 1989 CC No Study Session HOLIDAY
February 21, 1989 CC Regular Meeting 7:30 P.M.
February 27, 1989 PC Study Session 4:00 P.M.
February 28, 1989 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 F.M.
CC City Council
PC Planning Commission
CSC Community Services Commission
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Saundra L. Juhola, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta do hereby
declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of
February 7, 1989 was posted on the outside entry to the Council
Chamber, 78-105 Calle Estado and on the bulletin board at the La
Quinta Post Office on Friday, February 3, 1989.
Dated: February 3, 1989.
#AUNDRWAL*fMfl/TA<<%*Trl**lp OOOOO*
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RSCONTINUED FROM
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: December 20, 1988, January 17, 1989
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 7, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: 1
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP #23935 AND BUSINESS SESSION:
CONFIRMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT #88-101 CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
The proposal is to create 196 single-family lots on +50 acres. The
Subdivision is located southwest of the corner of Miles Avenue and
Dune Palms Road. The Planning Commission considered the matter on
November 22, 1988, and recommended approval of the tract subject to
conditions; and, approval of the Environmental Assessment.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Move to adopt City Council Resolution No. 88-* confirming the
Environmental Assessment #88-101, and approving Tentative Tract No.
23935, subject to the conditions.
Submitte4 by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
Signature *`K*OwSKI; CITY MANAGER
BJ/CC#12/06 Fl ooooo'1
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS MEMORANDUM
DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1989
TO: RONALD L. KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FROM: FRANK REYNOLDS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
SUBJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 23935 NOBLE)
It appears that the only matter holding up the further
processing of the subject tentative map is Condition No. 14,
upon which agreement between the various parties has not been
reached. As you are aware, the developer's engineer enlisted
the support of the California Council of Civil Engineers and
Land Surveyors and that organization wrote a letter to the City
Engineer, with copies to the City Manager, Attorney and Council
Members, requesting a meeting to discuss the issues involved.
While such a meeting has not yet been held, I have had informal
discussions with the developer's engineer and it does appear
that language acceptable to the City and the engineers can be
developed to address the concerns of both entities.
Therefore, it is recommended that the tentative tract map be
approved with Condition No. 14 rewritten to provide that the
matter of compliance with the design of the various improvements
shall be as set forth in a written mutual agreement between the
City Engineer and representatives of the California Council of
Civil Engineers and Land Surveyors.
000005
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R
S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RSCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
ANNEXATION NO. 3 TO THE CITY OF LA QUINTA BUSINESS SESSION: I
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
ANNEXATION NO. 3 RICK JOHNSON WAS APPROVED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION
COMMISSION LAFCO) ON JANUARY 26, 1989.
LAFCO DESIGNATED THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AS THE CONDUCTING AUTHORITY, AUTHORIZING
THE CITY TO ANNEX THE PROPERTY WITHOUT NOTICE, HEARING, OR ELECTION.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
MOVE TO ADOPT CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 89- APPROVING ANNEXATION NO. 3
Approved for submission to
City Council
Submij$te,
*by*
Sign*ture RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
OOOO25*
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1989
SUBJECT: SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AMENDMENT AND ANNEXATION NO. 3,
RICK JOHNSON
BACKGROUND:
On September 20, 1988, the Council adopted a Resolution of
Intention on behalf of the property owners to seek a sphere of
influence amendment and annexation from the Local Agency
Formation Commission LAFCO).
The request involved approximately 48.5 acres located northwest
of the Adams Street Starlight Drive) and Fred Waring
intersection.
LOCAL AGENCY FORMATION COMMISSION ACTION:
The Local Agency Formation Commission considered the City's
request on January 26, 1989. After public testimony, the
Commission voted to:
1. Approve the Sphere of Influence Amendment; and,
2. Designate the City of La Quinta as Conducting
Authority, authorizing the City to annex the
property without notice, hearing, or election.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Move to adopt City Council Resolution No. 89- approving
Annexation No. 3.
MR/MEMOCC. 048
OOo2*
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RS BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO. Qz
y
RESOLUTION NO. 89-1<
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE PRESERVATION
OF THE SANTA ROSA MOUNTAINS.
WHEREAS, the City Council has considered a request by
the Save Our Santa Rosas organization to support the
preservation and protection of the Santa RQSa Mountains; and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes the vital
economic and visual importance of the mountain viewscape" and
open space surrounding our city; and
WHEREAS, the Santa Rosa Mountains provide a habitat
for rare and endangered species of plants and animals and allow
both residents and visitors the opportunity to appreciate the
desert wilderness area without the intrusion of development.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council
of the City of La Quinta, California, does hereby support the
preservation and protection of the Santa Rosa Mountains, and
that it encourage all Coachella Valley communities to support
such efforts.
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 7th day of February,
1989 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
JOHN J. PENA, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
qqq031
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R S P.O. Bc*c 1401
Cathedral City
Cu. 92234
I
December 15, 1988
Mu*or John Pena
City of La Quinta
78105 Calle Esta*o
La Quinta, California 92253
*nor*le Mu*or and Council Member*
In Cath*al City, a new assault las begun on the 3&kta Rosa Mountains. Federated Developers, a
Houston based firm, has quietly bought up 1000+ acres of land that Cathedral City had included
within its original boundaries in order to prot*t" and maintain in its natural state" as much as
possible. quotes from C.C. General Plan.) To accomplish this, a very restrictive zoning was
applied to the area generally referred to as the South View Sector, OS-R Zone, which allowed one
dwelling per 20 acre parcel, and no commercial or golf courses. Needless to say, development has
been minimal.
The developer, Federated, who incidentally, created the Mirada project thet will install a 250
room hotel, Tennis Spa and 280+ living units On an 88 acre site o,overlooking the Coachella Valley
in Rancho Mirage, has asked for variances that will allow one golf course, 200 homes, and
commercial development overlooking the **lla Valley from Cathedral City. other plans they
have mentioned go as high as 1100 units, 2 golf courses, a hotel, Country Club and extensive
commercial development.
The SeYe Our Santa Ro*as Ownmittee, while it does not wish to deny any imi*,, or business the
rlqflt to *:: and develop their property, feels that Federated knew the law and its intent when
they begen this venture. In a Gambled and Lost situation we regret that they may not
realize a huge return on their investment. A movement is under way to ameliorate losses of this
type The *hella Valley Mountain Conservancy.) We fael that the interests of our community
and its citizens are of greeter importance than the limited wish of a few to destroy our heritage;
iZ* the heritage of the entire desert community, the *ta Ro* Mountain3.
00033
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R!S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R"S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R#S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R$S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R%S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R&S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R'S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R(S BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO.3
ROBERT LAMB HART Planners, Architects and
Landscape Architects, Ltd.
New York * San Francisco
242 California Street
San Francisco, Ca. 94111
415 986A260
January 23, 1989
Mr. Ron Kiedrowski
City Manager
City of La Quinta
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California 92253
Dear Ron:
It was a pleasure to meet with you the other day and to introduce
you to David Beaver, President of Northstar Development, the new
owners of The Grove property.
As we discussed during our meeting, I am writing now to request that
the City establish an improvement or assessment district that would
enable a comprehensive approach to certain improvements along the
Washington Street corridor. While our conversation dealt mainly with
the undergrounding of the liD transmission line, it is clear that the
City would also benefit from the completion of other public
infrastructure that would serve the Washington Street and Highway 111
Specific Plan areas.
Once you have raised the issue with the City Council, Mr. Beaver and
I would welcome the opportunity to meet with you and other property
owners in the area to take the necessary next steps.
Thank you again for our meeting and your consideration of this
matter.
Sincerely,
&(U?d
David P. Howerton
DPHJlrp
cc: David Beaver
Jeff Trant
00004q
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R)S MINUTE EXCERPT DESERT CLUB
Mr. Kiedrowski, City Manager, advised that staff has had two
structural engineers representing two firms review the buildings
and are in the process of writing a quick report as to how the
see the condition of the buildings and a general idea as to what
the think the renovation will cost. They both agreed that in
order to do a detailed set of costs, the City should first hire
an engineer or architect to look at the buildings to see if that
is what we want renovated. They both agreed that the buildings
as they stand today, were built for a function and that function
did not have as its primary purpose, recreational activities
it was a bar and restaurant. Therefore, we may wish to make
modifications to the structure jointly with any renovation. The
building is approximately 8,000 sq. ft.
The swimming pool will be looked at later this week. City crews
are moving ahead with building the City yard on the site and are
doing clean-up work as time permits.
Mr. Kiedrowski added that we have had various correspondence
with Mr. Hannon regarding signage. He has submitted pictures of
various signs. This matter will be agendized for the next
Council meeting noting that one of the conditions was obtaining
their approval of the sign.
FRED RICE, 48-780 Eisenhower, advised that there are four
historical buildings in La Quinta and the Desert Club is one of
them. He would hate to see it razed, but if it is, he asked
that the front doors be kept and donated to the Historical
Society for the future museum.
Mayor Pena noted that at the last meeting the Council authorized
staff to proceed with having the property surveyed and to obtain
two independent qualified reports on the structural condition of
the buildings and pool and approximately cost of bringing both
up to code and usable condition, which staff is in the process
of doing. The second part of the discussion dealt with the
formation of an advisory committee.
Council Member Rushworth stated that he originally felt that
Council Member Sniff*s proposal for a 14 member committee was
too large, but after thinking it over, he believes the bigger
the committee, the better. He felt that the entire Community
Services Commission should be on the committee making a total of
20 and that they should run this advisory committee.
000041
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R*SCouncil Member Bohnenberger passed out copies of Ordinance No.
109 establishing the Community Services Commission and referred
to a statement in which the Commission is to serve in an
advisory capacity to the City Council in all matters pertaining
to public recreation including the management, conduct, care and
development of the parks and playgrounds of the City. It also
states that the Commission or committees may from time to time
establish sub-committees composed of citizens and/or interested
people charged with the responsibility of implementing certain
designated projects subject to Commission and City Council
approval. That speaks directly to what's being proposed here.
They should be the body to take this project and run with it
with the Council's direction.
Council Member Sniff stated that he was primarily concerned with
two things 1) getting the project moving and 2) to include a
reasonably diverse group of citizen in the process. He had no
intent to bypass the Community Services Commission. He felt
they're important and can serve a vital role in this process.
He suggested giving them direction at this time; committee
makeup; and time frame.
Council Member Bosworth agreed that the Council should have some
control over the time element and suggested a time when they
should report back to the Council. However, she felt that it
should be up to the Commission as to how the committee should
be.
Council Member Rushworth disagreed because the northern part of
the city is hardly ever represented. He suggested that each
Council Member appoint two members.
Mayor Pena suggested that each Councilman select 3
representatives to work with the Commission and make those
appointments at the meeting of February 21st. That would give
the Committee a broad representation. And have them make a
report on their findings and recommendations at the first
meeting in April.
Council concurred that that wasn't enough time they need to be
given direction what are their constraints? What types of uses
are acceptable for the project they'll have to schedule
meetings with various community groups that are interested in
using the property look at various uses the property could be
put to given the facilities that are usable on the site. This
is a five or six month process.
Mr. Kiedrowski advised that part of their results are going to
have to be put to some kind of plan with professional
assistance. Be that professional landscape people; architects;
pool designers Tom and Saundra will be working with the
commission. He suggested that they commission) bring back an
outline in 30-45 days to make sure that everyone is going in the
same direction.
00004Z
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R+S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R,S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R-S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R.S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R/S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R0S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R1S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R2S COUNCIL MEE*I DATE: Fei)ruary 7, l9"** AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
Agreement for Use of Property on BUSINESS SESSION:
Avenue 52 for Recreational Purpose
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
*ACKGROUND:
The Agreement is with Landmark Land Co. of California for the use of their
property on Avenue 52 as recreational fields. The Agreement is similar to
the current Agreement on file with one change. The change alters the term
of the Agreement to be on a month to month basis as requested by Landmark
Land Co. of California.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: *Jij
None
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Approval of the Agreement with Landmark Land Co. of California for the use
of property located on Avenue 52 for recreational purposes.
Submitted By: Approved for submission to
Cit*ci*AL#
Signature
000050
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R3S
MEMORANDUM
*
TO: Honorable Mayor John Pena
and Members of City Council
FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, Assistant City
Manager4Q,.
DATE: February 2, 1989
SUBJECT: Agreement for Use of Property on Avenue 52 for
Recreational Purposes
Attached is the proposed Agreement with Landmark Land Company for
the use of the recreational fields located on Avenue 52. This
Agreement is identical to the Agreement currently on file which
the City Council previously approved.
The one change that has occurred is the term of the Agreement
which shall now be on a month-to-month basis as opposed to a
previous year-to-year basis. This change shall offer Landmark
Land Company additional flexibility with the ownership of their
land.
As with the previous Agreement, there is no charge for the use of
the land and therefore no financial impact to the City. All such
insurance requirements requested by Landmark Land Company of
California have been completed.
Recommendation:
Approval of the Agreement with Landmark Land Company for the use
of property located on Avenue 52 for recreational purposes.
TPG/jb
attachment
000051
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R4S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R5S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R6S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R7SCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 7, *989 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICE REQUEST BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR: 4
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
MS. BETTY GRAY, PROJECT MANAGER FOR THE DESERT GROVE PROJECT, AN ADULT MOBILE
HOME PARK AT 81-641 48TH AVENUE, INDIO, REQUESTS TO LOCATE A COLD AIR BALLOON
AT THE NORThWEST CORNER OF JEFFERSON STREET AND HIGHWAY 111.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Subrnij**t*jiY:* Approved for submission to
iY****onci1,
Signature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
000055
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R8S MEMORANDUM
CITY OF LA QUINTA
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1989
SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM BETTY GRAY, PROJECT MANAGER FOR
DESERT GROVE", AN ADULT MOBILE HOME PARK IN INDIO,
FOR A SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICE.
BACKGROUND:
Municipal Code Chapter 5.64, Special Advertising Devices",
provides for a permit to be issued by the City Council for
advertising devices other than the usual and customary
permanent business identification signs; and includes such
items as balloons.
REQUEST:
The referenced request has been received from Ms. Betty Gray,
Project Manager for the Desert Grove project at 81-641 48th
Avenue, Indio, in application for a cold air balloon. The
specifics of this request are contained in the attached
correspondence. This is the first request to advertise a
project not in La Quinta. See letter dated February 1, 1989,
attached.)
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS/ACTION:
Section 5.64.020 provides, in part, that permits are to be
issued for special purposes, and not on a continuing basis
for permanent advertising or identification purposes"; and
further, that, Each permit shall be issued for a specified
period of time subject to renewal for good cause shown."
MR/MEMOCC.047 1- qo()o5*
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R9S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R:S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R;SCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
BUSINESS SESSION:
MODIFICATION TO CONDITIONS
TENTATIVE TRACT 23292 DUNA LA QUINTA) CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
On May 3, l9*8, the City Council approved Tentative Tract 23292 Duna L
Quinta) subject to conditions. Subsequently, discussions have been hel
between myself, the City Engineer and the developer relative to several o
those conditions. Following discussions, the attached modifications t
certain conditions have been agreed to subject to the Council's ratification
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council ratify the City Manager and City Engineer1
understanding with regard to certain conditions relative to Tentative Trac
23292.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
* *A<*
Signature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORM#OOl.ALL 000059
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R<S
MEMORANDUM
OF
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
DATE. FEBRUARY 7, 1989
SUBJECT: TT 23292 Duna La Quinta)
Following discussions between members of the City staff and
representatives of the developer, certain modifications to and
interpretations of the conditions of approval attached to the
subject tentative tract are in order:
Condition 4 b 1). Rather than three-quarter
improvements along Calle Tampico from Washington Street and
Calle Rondo, the developer shall install full street
improvements. Further Oak Tree West" should more clearly be
defined as Specific Plan 85-006.
Condition 4 b 4). This condition should be deleted.
City to build this section, with reimbursement from
adjoining property owner)
Condition 4 b 5). It is understood that the developer
is responsible for one-half the cost of a raised median and that
the intent is to provide a bond or letter of credit for that
share of the cost.
Condition 4 c. Pursuant to the result of the Council-
authorized traffic study in the area, this condition is void.
Unrestricted temporary access to the entire tract shall be
permitted on Avenue 50 at a location near the west line of Lot
194. Details of the temporary access shall be subject to the
approval of the City Engineer. This temporary access shall be
abandoned at such time that 50% of the buildable lots within the
tract have received occupancy permits.
Further, permanent access from Avenue 50 to Lot 194 shall be
permitted, providing that such access point be located at or
near the east line of Lot 194.
Condition 4 f. It is understood that the developer's
share of a future traffic signal at the intersection of Avenue
50 and Park Avenue shall not exceed 25% and that the intent is
to have the developer provide a bond or letter of credit for his
share of the cost.
Further, referring back to Condition 4 b 5), the developer*'*
share of the cost of the Avenue 50 median is 50%. uuOO6D
In addition, the requirement for a bikeway path along Park
I I 9
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R=S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R>S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R?S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!R@S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RAS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RBS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RCSCity Council Minutes Page 5 December 2* 1988
MOTION It was moved by Council Member Sniff, seconded by
Council Member Bohnenberger to take up Ordinance No. 134 by title
and number only and that further reading be waived. Motion
carried unanimously.
ORDINANCE NO. 134
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA,
CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTERS 9.156 and 9.42 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE ZONING ORDINANCE. CASE NO. ZOA 88-006)
MOTION It was moved by Council Member Sniff, seconded by
Council Member Rushworth that Ordinance No. 134 be introduced on
first reading. Motion passed by the following vote.
AYES: Council Members Bohnenberger, Bosworth, Rushworth,
Sniff, Mayor Pena
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
MOTION It was moved by Council Member Bohnenberger, seconded by
Council Member Bosworth that Environmental Assessment No. 88-105
be confirmed. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO.
88-165.
STUDY SESSION
2. DISCUSSION OF CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU:
a. PROPOSED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT.
b. DISCUSSION OF MEMBERSHIP IN DESERT RESORT COMMUNITIES
CONVENTION AND VISITORS BUREAU.
c. DISCUSSION OF CITY'S OBLIGATION TO DRCCVB DEFICIT.
Mr. Kiedrowski summarized Council's discussion during the Study
Session of December 19, 1988, advising that Council seemed to
concur with forwarding the Joint Powers Agreement to the City
Attorney for his review regarding joining the new JPA; discussion
of current membership in the Desert Resort Communities Convention
and Visitors Bureau; and discussion of the City's obligation to
contribute to the deficit of DRCCVB. Mr. Kiedrowski noted that
letters have been received regarding support of it from Beef and
Brew; Multi-Media Unlimited and The Huntsman.
a. PROPOSED JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT.
Council Member Sniff expressed support of the formation of a JPA
with tourist promotion as its goal.
MOTION It was moved by Council Member Sniff, seconded by
Council Member Bosworth to approve in concept the formation of
and intent to become a member of the JPA for tourist promotion
valley Wide as outlined in the proposal dated December 12, 1988.
000067
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RDSCity Council Minutes Page 6 December 2Q 1988
Council Member Bohnenberger suggested a motion approving the
agreement subject to the City Attorney's review and upon his
approval of the document, authorize the City Manager to issue the
City's share of $7,947.00 to carry through the fiscal year.
Council Member Sniff concurred that the document should be
reviewed by the City Attorney and then possibly at the next
meeting take a second action to approve funding.
MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY. MINUTE ORDER NO. 88-166.
C. DISCUSSION OF CITY'S OBLIGATION TO DRCCVB DEFICIT.
RICHARD OLIPHANT, Mayor of the City of Indian Wells, expressed
his appreciation that the City of La Quinta is taking action in
the formation of a Valley-wide CVB. Mayor Oliphant shared some
history of DRCCVB, explaining the background of the financial
problems which developed. If the cities do not pay their dues to
help eliminate the deficit, he was afraid the Valley will have a
black eye and be a detriment to the new JPA. He also expressed
the importance of the City's obligation to give the amount the
City budgeted in pointing out that the CVB funds were not
mis-spent, but rather were spent over-spent) promoting the
cities in the Coachella Valley. He urged that the City give the
$35,000 they budgeted. He also reviewed pending claims and suits.
COUNCIL MEMBER SNIFF expressed concern regarding the City's
obligation, as he felt the $35,000 was never directed to the CVB
in the motion he made and stated the City has not been a member
for over a year and a half or paid dues. If the City gave any
public monies this could open La Quinta to further claims and
possible legal problems. Therefore, he couldn't support any
monies going toward this deficit.
In answer to Council Member Bohnenberger, Mayor Oliphant advised
that the settlement from some of the pending law suits is part of
the deficit and will be paid from the balance of the funds
received from the remaining cities. Mr. Barry Brandt, City
Attorney, advised that the DRCCVB is a non-profit organization
and the members of the corporation are not individually liable
for any future or pending claims.
COUNCIL MEMBER BOHNENBERGER also stated his concern and regret
that CVB ended up in this financial position. He mentioned that
Mr. Zimmerman requested $30,0000, however, the City budgeted only
a $15,000 cap for CVB for that year which the City paid. This
year, it was discussed to drop out entirely with $30,000 set
aside for the purpose of promotion but was not earmarked for
DRCCVB. Councilman Bohnenberger felt however, because the City
did not advise the Bureau that we were cancelling membership and
with Mayor Pena continuing to serve on the Board to bring into
effect the transfer over to JPA it gave an indication the City
was still active members. Therefore, he felt that the City has a
moral obligation for a portion of the
OOOO6**
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RES NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RFS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RGSCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSIDERATION OF RECOMMENDATION OF
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION RE- CONSENT CALENDAR:
GARDING *LA QUINTA BEAUTIFUL'1 AWARD
PROGRAM. STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
At their January 25th meeting, the Community Services Commission considered
the recipient for the first La Quinta Beautiful" award. During their
deliberations, they noted a need to recognize people who continually
maintain their property in a beautiful manner and a need to recognize people
who make a marked improvement in their property. Therefore, they asked that
the City Council authorize two awards monthly. One for the best maintained
property and one for the most improved property.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council authorize two 11La Quinta Beautiful" awards monthly
one for the best maintained and one for marked improvement*
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
*1gnature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORM#OO1.ALL
O()071
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RHS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RIS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RJS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RKS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RLS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RMS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RNS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!ROS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RPS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RQS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RRS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02
i^!RSS NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
11-12-1998-U01
05:36:37PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
02-U02
07-U02
1989-U02