The URL can be used to link to this page

1989 08 01 CCi^"` c1* *o C*oFT$* CITY COUNCIL AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting August 1, 1989 7:30 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Beginning Res. No. 89-90 Ord. No. 145 a. Pledge of Allegiance b. Roll Call CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA ANNOUNCEMENTS PUBLIC HEARINGS 1. Public Hearing on Lot Cleaning/weed Abatements and Placement of Cost on 1990/91 Tax Rolls: a. Labrot, Patricia APN 769-113-013 $125.00 b. Roselli, Thomas & Rose APN 773-314-004 $125.00 C. Roselli, Thomas & Rose APN 773-314-005 $125.00 a) Resolution Action. 2. Public Hearing on Reprogramming Year 13 community Development Block Grant Funds. a) Resolution Action. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS BUSINESS SESSION 1. Consideration of Actions Relative to Assessment District No. 89-2 Phase II Cove Improvement Project: a. Adoption of Resolution Determining Unpaid Assessments, the Manner of Payment Therefor, Listing the Bonds to be Issued on the Security Therefor, Authorizing the Filing of an Addendum to the Notice of Assessment and Determining the Assessment of Administration Costs. b. Adoption of Resolution Providing for the Issuance and Sale of Limited Obligation Improvement Bonds of Said City, in an Aggregate Prin*i*** * *; * BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`2. Approval of Agreement with Kicak and Associates for Engineering Services for Phase III Cove Improvement Project. a) Minute Order Action. 3. Appeal of Chester Dorn of Planning Commission Denial of Sign Application 89-088 For Sign on Existing Building Located at the Southwest Corner of Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas in the C-V-C Zone Commercial Village Core). a) Minute Order Action. 4. Adoption of Urgency Ordinance Relative to Recyclable Materials. a) Ordinance Action. 5. Approval of Agreement with La Quinta Arts Foundation. a) Minute Order Action. 6. Approval of Agreement with La Quinta Chamber of Commerce for Lease of Property at 51-351 Avenida Bermudas. a) Minute Order Action. 7. Approval of Budget for Landscaping and Lighting District. a) Minute Order Action. 8. Consideration of Adoption of Design Review Standards. a) Resolution Action. 9. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 144 Chg. of Zone Lake La Quinta CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of Demand Register. 2. Approval of Minutes of June 20, 22 and July 5, 1989. 3. Approval of Agreement for Lease of Office Spaces Located at 78-105 Calle Estado for City Hall Facility. 4. Acceptance of Deed for Street Right of Way General Telephone Co. 5. Approval of Agreement with Coachella Valley Water District for Work in Phase II Cove Improvement Project. 6. Approval of Agreement for Investment Services for 1915 Act Improvement Bond Issue Proceeds of Assessment District No. 89-2 Sanitary Sewer of Phase II Cove Improvement Project. 7. Acceptance of Deed from Coachella Valley Water District for Well Site Northeast of Fritz Burns Park. 8. Authorization to Call for Bids for Maintenance of Medians on Avenue 54 and Madison. Q BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`9. Approval of Special Advertising Device for Starlight Dunes Subdivision, Located at the Northwest Corner of Fred Waring Drive and Starlight Lane Applicant: Rick Johnson Construction. 10. Report of Planning Commission Action on Plot Plan 85-203 Sunrise Company Approval of New Unit Types, Sales Facility Expansion, and a Time Extension for the Sales Facility Located Within PGA West Project. 11. Report of Planning Commission Action on Variance 89-008 and Sign Application 89-086 for Illuminated Subdivision Identification Signs for Cactus Flower Located at the Southeast Corner of Fred Waring Drive and Dune Palms Road Applicant: Williams Development Corporation. 12. Report of Planning Commission Action on Plot Plan 89-417 Approval of Commercial Complex Consisting of 10,250 sq. ft. Restaurant and 10,000 sq. ft. Office Building in the CPS Zone, Located on the North Side of Highway 111, Approximately 1,200 ft. West of Washington Street Applicant: TS Restaurants. 13. Approval of Agreement with Chairman Iwen for Accounting Services. 14. Denial of Claim of George Miers and Associates. 15. Denial of Claim of Gilbert and Diane Olson. COUNCIL COMNENT PUBLIC COMMENT CLOSED SESSION a. Discussion of Personnel Matters b. Discussion of Litigation George Miers and Associates City of indio/indio Case No. 57496 Wayne Weber/John Maselter Indio Case No. 56867 c. Discussion of Land Acquisition ADJOURNMENT 3 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` STUDY SESSION AGENDA Monday, July 31, 1989 3:00 P.M. NOTE: Action may be taken on any of the following items during the regularly scheduled Council Meeting of August 1, 1989. 1. Video Review of Desert Club Demolition. DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS a. City Manager b. Assistant City Manager C. Administrative Services Director d. Community Safety Director e. Planning Director f. Public Works Director REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS a. Planning Commission Minutes of May 23, 1989. b. Community Services Commission Minutes of June 26, 1989 C. C. V. Recreation and Park District d. Sunline Transit Agency e. CVAG Committee Reports NOTICE OF UPCOMING COUNCIL/COMMISSION MEETINGS July 31, 1989 CC Study Session 3:00 P.M. August 1, 1989 CC Regular Meeting 7:30 P.M. August 7, 1989 PC Study Session 4:00 P.M. August 8, 1989 Pc Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. August 21, 1989 Pc Study Session 4:00 P.M. August 22, 1989 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M. September 5, 1989* CC Study Session 3:00 P.M. September 6, 1989** CC Regular Meeting 7:30 P.M. *Tuesday * *Wednesday CC City Council PC Planning Commission CSC Community Services Commission DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Saundra L. Juhola, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of August 1, 1989 was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-105 Calle Estado and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Post Office on Thursday, July 27, 1989. AUNDRA L. JUH City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 1 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: I Weed Abatement/Lot Cleaning Assessments For Placement On BUSINESS SESSION: 1990/91 Property Tax Roll CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The purpose of this hearing is to provide the Council the opportunity to hear and consider all public objections and protests if any, to the report filed with the Council containing a description of each real property parcel cleared or cleaned by the City of La Quinta. Notices of tonights public hearing were sent to the property owner, advising him of the hearing date. No written communications have been received regarding this matter. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Following public comment and close of the public hearing, it is respectfully recommended that the Council take the following action: 1. Adopt the proposed Resolution, approving and adopting the Resolution to place the cost of cleaning said lots on the 1990/91 property tax rolls. Submitted by: COMMUNITY SAFETY DEPT. Approved for submission to City Council: Signature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER FORMitOO3 ALL BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` RESOLUTION 89- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSESSING LIEN AND PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION ON TAX ROLLS ON CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE WHEREAS, Chapter 11.72 of the La Quinta Municipal Code provides for the declaration and determination of certain conditions of property to be a public nuisance and further provides for the abatement of said nuisance by certain procedures including abatement by the City and collection of the cost of said abatement on the tax rolls; and WHEREAS, in accordance with said abatement procedures, the Community Safety Director of the City of La Quinta, as agent of the City Manager, has determined that a public nuisance exists on the following described premises, and has given the notice required by law, and the owner thereof has failed to appeal said determination and has failed to abate said nuisance as required in said notice; and WHEREAS, in accordance with said abatement procedure, the Community Safety Director has, by contract, provided for the abatement of said public nuisance on said properties and has filed a report thereon with the City Council and the City Council has conducted a hearing on said report and the assessment of said costs against said properties. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby RESOLVE as follows: 1. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that the City has abated a public nuisance on each of the following described premises and has conducted a hearing on assessment of the costs of said abatement in the time and manner as required by law and further determines that there were no objections or protests to assessments of said costs by any interested party* 2. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and orders that the report of the Community Safety Director relative to assessment of costs is hereby approved and the City Council hereby orders that the following costs are hereby assessed as liens against the following properties and the amount of said assessment shall be collected at the time and in the manner of ordinary property taxes: BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PU*LIC HEARING: REPROGRAMMING YEAR 13 COMMUNITY BUSINESS SESSION: DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS. CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The Riverside County Economic and Community Development Department has determined that the City did not follow precisely the requirements of purchasing Civic Center site, so CDBG funds cannot be used for the Senior Center site acquisition. The only alternative is to reprogram funds. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Redirection of Community Development Block Grant funds $120,000). APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt the attached City Council Resolution reprogramming CDBG Year 13 funds $120,000) to construction of Senior Center. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: nat RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER 2/ BJ/CC*8/1 F2 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Department DATE: AUGUST 1, 1989 SUBJECT: REPROGRAMMING YEAR 13 CDBG FUNDS BACKGROUND Year 13 CDBG Funds had been programmed for the purchase of 1-1/2 acres of the Civic Center site for the Senior Center location. The purchase of the Civic Center site was completed in January of 1988. Now, the Riverside County Economic and Community Development Department informs us that the purchase was not precisely following the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policy Act", and hence, CDBG funds cannot be used for the acquisition of the Senior Center site. As a result, the City has little choice but to reprogram the funds toward the construction of the Senior Center or to some other purpose). The letter informing the City of this problem is attached. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached Resolution, reprogramming the $120,000 toward the construction of the Senior Center. 7 1- BJ/MEMOJH. 002 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Consider Authorization to enter into an agreement with Kicak and Associates for Phase III of the Cove Improvements Project. BUSINESS SESSION: CONS ENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: This is the continuation of the Cove project and covers the area between Calle Colima and Calle Nogales. If authorization is given, design work can commence so that contract documents will be ready when construction funds become available. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: Not to exceed $205,000 RDA) RECOMMENDATION: Authorize entering into an Agreement. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: Al I> RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER FORM#001 ALL /7 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: APPEAL OF CHESTER DORN OF PUBLIC HEARING: PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL OF SIGN APPLICATION NO. 89-008 FOR SIGN ON BUSINESS SESSION: EXISTING BUILDING LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF CALLE TAMPICO AND CONSENT CALENDAR: AVENIDA BERMUDAS IN THE C-V-C ZONE. STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The Applicant is appealing a Planning Commission denial of an Ace Hardware11 sign for his existing building at the southwest corner of Calle Tampico and Avenida Bermudas in the Village Specific Plan area. The Planning Commission instructed the Applicant to redesign the sign to be in conformance with the Village Specific Plan criteria. The requested sign on the east side of the building, has been installed. The sign maker installed the sign because he thought his application for sign approval was a Planning Department approval and Building permit. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Review action of the Planning Commission in light of the Applicant's appeal and determine acceptability. Action may be taken by minute motion. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: *u * * Signature *ON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER* BJ/CC#8/l.F5 1; BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` z MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Department DATE: AUGUST 1, 1989 APPLICANT: CHESTER DORN ACE HARDWARE) SUBJECT: SIGN APPLICATION #89-088: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION DENIAL REGARDING BUSINESS IDENTIFICATION SIGN FOR EXISTING BUILDING LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF CALLE TAMPICO AND AVENIDA BERMUDAS BACKGROUND This appeal is before the City Council at this time because of action the Planning Commission took at its meeting of June 27, 1989. The Planing Commission denied the request of the Applicant for a wall mounted business identification sign facing Avenida Bermudas and instructed the Applicant to redesign the sign. The redesign request is based on the signs nonconformance to the Village Specific Plan sign criteria. The attached Planning Commission Staff report dated June 27, 1989, explains the request and reasons for the noncompliance. This application was previously discussed at the Planning Commission meeting of June 13, 1989, in conjunction with Plot Plan #89-414. The Plot Plan application which proposed exterior remodeling to the structure was approved June 13, 1989, by the Commission and accepted by the City Council on June 20, 1989. One of the requirements was that a landscaping plan revamping the existing landscaping be submitted. That plan was submitted and reviewed by the Planning Commission on June 27, 1989. The Planning Commission approved the landscaping plan subject to revisions adding a vertical tree element at each end of Avenida Bermudas side of the lot adjacent to the building. It should be noted that the denied sign was installed by the sign company prior to the June 13th review, because the sign company thought that the sign was approved when he applied for the permit. BJ/MEMOSS. 002 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission on June 27, 1989, denied the request of the Applicant for the sign and requested the sign be redesigned utilizing the following criteria: 1. Applicant should consider a redwood sandblasted sign or sign on glazed tile with compatible indirect lighting. 2. Sign logo and size is acceptable. 3. Sign colors should be modified to be restrained and muted earth tones. COUNCIL ACTION The City Council should review the action of the Planning Commission in light of the Applicants appeal, and determine acceptability. Action may be taken by minute motion. Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Staff report including sign plans, dated June 27, 1989. 2. Appeal of Planning Commission action received July 5, 1989. BJ/MEMOSS 002 iso BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: Urgency Ordinance, recyclable materials and containers CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: This Urgency Ordinance is needed to protect the city's investment in the recycle program, and it is also needed by the Sheriff's Department so they can enforce the anti-scavenging that is taking place. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends adopting this Urgency Ordinance. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: *I(I /*L * ROGER HIRDLER RON KIEDROWSKI COMMUNITY SAFETY DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER FORM#OO1.ALL BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` ORDINANCE NO. AN URGENCY ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADDING CHAPTER 6.05, RECYCLE MATERIAL, TO THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta has initiated a recycle program including, but not limited to, single-family curbside recycling; and WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta is incurring certain costs to initiate these programs; and WHEREAS, collected materials sold offset the operating costs of the program; and WHEREAS, the recycle programs benefit the community and the nation as a whole. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, in order to protect the environment and natural resources, does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. That a Chapter 6.05 be added to the La Quinta Municipal Code and be titled as follows: Chapter 6.05 Recyclable Materials. Section 2. That Section 6.05.010, Definitions", be added to the La Quinta Municipal Code and shall read as follows: 6.05.010 Definitions. The following words and phrases shall apply in this chapter. A) Recyclable Materials. All materials including, but not limited to, newsprint, glass, cans, and other resources for which the city, or a contractor of the city, collect in order to reuse, resell, or convert to a usable product. B) Curbside Programs. As used in this chapter and associated thereto, shall mean the location where the recycle materials shall be placed and picked up by the city, or a contractor of the city. C) Recycle Containers. As used in this chapter and associated thereto, shall mean all containers authorized for the collection of recyclable materials." Section 3. That Section 8.17.020, Authorization to Remove and Convey Recyclable Materials", be added to the La Quinta Municipal Code and shall read as follows: BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`! NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`" COUNCIL MEETING DATE AUGUST 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY ITEM TITLE APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH PUBLIC HEARING LA QUINTA ARTS FESTIVAL BUSINESS SESSION CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION BACKGROUND: Attached is an agreement with La Quinta Arts Festival for promotion and implementation of a fall arts and crafts faire La Quinta Village Faire) and promotion and implementation of a 3-day outdoor fine arts festival La Quinta Arts Festival). The funds for these services are budgeted. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: $35,000 RECOMMENDATION: That the attached agreement be approved and that the Mayor be authorized to execute same on behalf of the Citv. Submitted by: Approved for submission to Ci Council: BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`# A! July 12, 1989 *OUNDATION Ron Kiedrowski City Manager CITY OF LA QUINTA 1z Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Ron, John and I enjoyed meeting with you last Thursday. Thanks for your valuable insight and suggestions. I have enclosed two copies of the contract which will finalize the terms of our agreement for the 1989-1990 year. It addresses the Faire and the Festival as did the 1988-1989 contract. The Board was interested in your idea of an artist-in-residence program, but feels it is too late to implement this year as our programs and our budget are in place. However, it will be considered in the following year. The La Quinta Arts Foundation appreciates the City of La Quinta's generous support of our activities. We are also grateful for the cooperation and support offered by you and your staff. We look forward to working with you in the exciting and challenging year ahead. Yours truly, LA UN Meg Ro ertson Exe u ive Director MR/tg Enclosures POST OFFICE BOX 777 * LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 * 619)564-1244 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`$ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`% NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`&COUNCIL MEETING DATE AUGUST 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY ITEM TITLE APPROVAL OF LEASE WITH PUBLIC HEARING LA QUINTA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE FOR BUSINESS SESSION BUILDING AT 51-351 AVENIDA BERMUDAS. CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION BACKGROUND: During the budgetary process, the Council agree* to lease the building at 51-351 Avenida Bermudas to the La Quinta Cha**ber of Commerce. The City Attorney has prepared the attached ground lease for Council's approval. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: RECOMMENDATION: That the attached agreement be approved and tha* the Mayor be authorized to execute same on behalf of the City. Submitted by: Approved for submission to Council: RO* KIEDROWSKI, CITY * BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`'07-26-89 12:25?M E6V**R Newport Beach CA P02** GROUND LEASE by and between *ITY OF LA QUINTA CITY" *nd LA QUINTA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE a Ca*ifornia nonprofit corporation LESSEE" dated a* of 19S9 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`(07-26-89 12:26PM EG*'**R Newport Beach CA P03** TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE I. TERM 1.1 Premises 1.2 Reservation 1.3 Exceptions *o Leasehold Estate 1.4 Term o* Lease 1.5 Term Coi*rnencement Date 1.6 Riqht to Possession of Premises 1.7 Date of Lease and Legal Effect 1.8 Rent Commencement Date 1.9 Commencement Date for All Other Obligations ARTICLE II. RENT 2.1 Minimum Rent 2.2 Additional Pay*ents 2.3 Place of Payment; Late Payments Article III. USE AND COMPLIANCE WIT* LAW 3.1 Use of Premises ARTICLE IV. LESSEE*S PAYMENT OF EXPENSES ARTICLE V. MAINTENANCE O* lease:D PREMISES 5.1 Lessee** Obi*ations for Maintenance ARTI(*LE VI. INSURANCE AND INDEMNITY 6.1 Lessee*s Insurance 6.2 Covenant to Inde**nify and H*1d Harmless 6.3 Wai'*et of Subroqa*ion ARTICLE VII. UTILITY CXA*GES 7.1 Utility Charges ARTICLE VIII. ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS 8.1 A*terations arid Additions AR'L*CLE Ix. NO AS*1G*MENT ANI) SUBLETTING 9.1 City's Consent Required 9.2 Lessee Remains Obligated i) #0 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`) NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`* NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`+ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`, NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`- NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`. NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`/ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`0 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`1 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`2 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`3 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`4 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`5 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`6 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`7 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`8 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`9 NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`: NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`; NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`<COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Approval of Budget for Landscape BUSINESS SESSION: I and Lighting District CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: Set forth in attached memorandum RECOMMENDATION: Approve budget for Fund 16 and authorize redistribution of monies budgeted in Fund 13 Submitted Approved for submission to RON *IEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER FORM*002 0 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`= 0 MEMORANDUM TO: Ronald L. Kiedrowski, City Manager FROM: Frank Reynolds, Director of Public Works DATE: July 19, 1989 SUBJECT: Parks and Landscape Budgets Funds 13 and 16 Subsequent to the preparation of the 1989-90 budget requests the City Council proceeded with the formation of a City-wide Lighting and Landscape District* This leaves two unfinished items of business in the budgeting process. The first is the approval of a budget for the District, which is designated Fund 16. The second is to redistribute the original Fund 13 budget. In connection with the former, a proposed budget has been prepared and is attached hereto. Its bottom line of $515,000 matches exactly the amount to be assessed upon the properties within the District. The original appropriation in Fund 13 amounted to $118,151 of General Fund monies and that amount is now included in the District budget. Therefore, it is available to either place back into the contingency account or be applied to other projects. It is our recommendation that it be distributed to other projects. Specifically, it had been anticipated that the developer of the Parc La Quinta tract would construct Sagebrush Avenue during the past fiscal year in which City funds in the amount of $25,000 had been budgeted as its share of the cost. This didn't happen with the result that the City's share was neither re-budgeted nor carried over. Additionally, the developer of Tract No. 23292, which is the area around the Dunes Golf Course across Avenue 50 from the school, is proceeding with his project. In connection with that development it has been the City's expressed intent to provide a safe route to school via Calle Tampico and Park Avenue to Avenue 50. A portion of Park Avenue through lands not under the control of this developer is dedicated and is the responsibility of the City to construct. It is estimated that the cost for the initial improvement of this section will be $70,000. It would be our intent to attempt to recover this money at such time that the property through which it passes is developed. Another item worthy of consideration is the financing of the Jefferson Street improvement project. Now that the design is complete, there is some question that the funds budgeted, $171,000 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`> NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`? NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`@ NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`ACOUNCIL MEETING DATE: Augu*t 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: Planning Commission recommends Design Review Standards as per Title II 9, Chapter 9.183 Design Review FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Adopt Resolution adopting Design Review Standards. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: S atur RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER BJ/CC*8/1 F. 1 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`B 0 z MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: THE PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: AUGUST 1, 1989 SUBJECT: DESIGN REVIEW STANDARDS BACKGROUND On January 3rd, the City Council completed the second reading of the Village zoning Text. Included in the amendments to the zoning Ordinance was the Design Review Chapter 9.183). The ordinance amendment took effect February 3rd, 1989. The adopted version of the Design Review Text omits the language of the Design Review Standards included in earlier drafts. In place of this section is a statement: Design Review Standards shall be developed and adopted and/or amended by a Resolution of Council upon a recommendation of the Planning Commission." This mechanism was selected to permit a closer scrutiny of the standards before adoption as well as a greater adaptability over time. As a result of the statement in the ordinance amendment, the Planning Commission was charged with the development of a recommendation to the City Council on the language of Design Review Standards. The Planning Commission recommended the following Design Review Standards on February 28, 1989. The recommendation was not forwarded to Council immediately in hopes that additional members of the Design Review Committee could be found, and the two recommendations could be advanced together. However, the work on the Design Review Committee has not been fruitful as yet. Too few design professionals are residents of La Quinta.) Therefore, the Design Review Standards are being presented for possible adoption so that the Planning Commission, acting as the Design Review Committee, can use the standards. RECOMMENDATIONS: Adopt the Planning Commission recommendation for the Design Review Standards by adopting the attached Resolution. BJ/MEMOTB. 001 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`C NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`D NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`E NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`F NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`G NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`H NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`I NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`J NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`K ORDINANCE NO. 144 71 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP FOR THE CITY, BY REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY REFERRED TO IN CHANGE OF ZONE NO. 89-037 LAKE LA QUINTA) a) The City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, does ordain as follows: a) C) SECTION 1. The La Quinta District Official Zoning Plan Map No. 14, as amended adopted by City Council Ordinance No. 5, operative August 29, 1982), is further amended by rezoning from R-2-2500, R-2-9600 and R-5 to R-1, R-2 and C-P-S, those certain parcels shown and depicted for such rezoning on the map which is attached to and made a part of this Ordinance, which attached map is labeled Exhibit A, Change of Zone 89-037. SECTION 2. Said Change of Zone has complied with the requirements of *The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970t1 County of Riverside, Resolution No. 82-213, adopted by reference in City of La Quinta Ordinance No. 5), in that the Planning Director conducted an initial study, and has determined that the proposed Change of Zone and concurrent Tentative Tract will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty 30) days after its adoption. SECTION 4. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. CM/ORDDRFT.OO* 1- BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`L72 The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this day of 1989, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: City of La Q inta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: * CITY ATTORNEY 1< City of La Quinta, California CM/ORDDRFT.006 2- BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`M NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`N NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`O NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`PCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: July 18, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: Held On ITEM TITLE: August 1, 1989 PUBLIC HEARING: Demand Register BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: I STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants 5690-5696 3356-3434 894-943 *8O6,663*53 Payable Warrants 5330-5405 *27*4.99 TOTAL *1*878.52 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: Demand of Cash *1,O79,878.52 RECO*ENDAT ION: Approval of Demand Register Submitted By: Approved for submission to City Cou*1: Signature 9 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`Q 2 W* * * * * C 2 2ZZ*2 Iz W a z *C*z N LI * 2 Z 2 c * * 2 * U' A' * * 2 2 * 3 * * * 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 Z 2 * * C us A a. A' A A 1 22 22 * * z z- x x 2 2 2 * Si a *-** * A- N * 5'"' iA' * A'A * * * a a W *`J) * *a a' 0 0 i A' a' 2 * C a a a * * w A * a' * a * a a*0 ***xX*xX * * * * * w C * 3 z z' z' * **i w 0 Al * C 0 C i C 0 C 0 * * 2 2 2 Z * a a * A I N- A'CCCCCC*CC * * * t * a r A A A" * 3 3 Z A' * C s'i C U) C U) C * U) U) U) A * C C C C C C s 2' ii 0 0 * 0 0 * * 0 * * 0 L* 0 0 * Iii * 0 *`* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 * 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 * * 0 0 0 * 0 * 0 Li 0 * * 0 * *`*`.` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 0 0 * Li *. 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 Li 0 * * * 0 Li * L* 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 0 0 * * 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 C Li 00*0*0*-* t**0Li00b'.LiLi0 *000000 0 0 0 * *000000000 o 0 * 0 * Li * * 0 Li 0 Li 0 W * 0 Li 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 Li 2 0 0 * 0 * N ** 1 Li * 0 * * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 * * 0 * Li i* Li * 0 0 0 0 0 Li Li Li 0 0 * Li Li Li Li-Li * N C 5 Li z *- Z*C C C C C C A C a: A'" a a-- C C a C J * C C C * 2 * C 2 2 * 22 C* 3. 3 3 2 C Ls*C CZ a: a: a:*a: C 2 J 2C* *AZ *Aa:2 C 2 Cr 2 C C- C * A 2 2 C L * * * C C 2 3 * C C * 2 * 2 * 2 3 L 3 30'** * z * *C'* * *23C 2 3 C ** *C*3*A 2 C 2 * 2 * * 2 * * C C.**CC3* *C * C *_ ******* *,**.*.**-,** 5.******..' * * * ** *******.** N N N * N 0 0 0-s *`*:-.`**- 5 * hr N N N N N N N N N N N N'..- N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N * N N N N N N N N N C" N N N N * N N N N N N N N N N N N N N NA N N N N N N N N N N'.. A N N N N N N N \ N N N N N N \ N N \ \ N N N N N * N \ N N N N N N \ N NN * N ** \ N L."' N N N N 0 0 N * N- N N N N-N* N N, NNNNNOOO C. C'. C' C' C'. S S'S 5 5 C2 0 C. 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N \ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N \ N \ \ \ N \ N N \ N N N C N N' N" N N, N N N N N N N N N r- N *` N N N N N N,' N N N N, N N N N N BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`R NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`S NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`T NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`U NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`V NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`W NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`X NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`YCOUNCIL MEETING DATE; August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Approval of Agreement for lease of office space located at 78-105 Calle BUSINESS SESSION: Estado for the City Hall Facility. CONSENT CALENDAR: 3 STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The City has been leasing the above identified property for the last few years as a City Hall Facility. This agreement will extend the above noted lease to November 30, 1991. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: Costs are currently budgeted. Total cost of the lease over the two year term is $67,200*00 RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the City Manager to execute the referenced lease on behalf of the City of La Quinta Submitted By: Approved for submission to **x CAtYCo1u%ci1:*, Signature BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`Z LEASE AGREEMENT NO. 6 1. Reference is made to Lease dated July 7, 1982, and Lease amendment Nos 1,2,3 and 4 between M.D. Brennan & Albert Wild, Lessor, and CITY OF LA QUINTA, Lessee, regarding lease of office space in Lessor owned building at 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California. 2. This Amendment No. 6, executed August 1, 1989, to the above referenced Lease, is as follows: The Lessors are George and Katherine Fenady, current owners of the building located at 78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California. Lessors hereby lease to Lessee, and Lessee rents from Lessor, six 6) office suites, namely A-F comprising approximately 3,020 sq. ft. of floor space, for additional two-year period commencing Dec. 1, 1989 and ending Nov. 30, 1991. 3. The total monthly rental payments for *uites A-F, shall be adjusted as follows: Commencing Dec. 1, 1989, the total sum of $2,800.00. 4. The total rent of the above referenced Lease Amendment No. 6. is hereby adjusted to $67,200.00 5. Lessee shall pay the utility charges on electric meters A-F. 6. Lessee shall be given the option to renew this lease for two 2) additional years, exercisable by giving Lessors written notice of intentions to renew at least six 6) months prior to November 30, 1991. 7. All other provisions of the referenced Lease and Amendments shall apply. George Fenady LESSOR CITY OF LA QUINTA Katherine Fenady LESSOR SEAL) LESSEE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`[COUNCIL MEETING DATE AUGUST 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY ITEM TITLE ACCEPTANCE OF DEED FROM PUBLIC HEARING GENERAL TELEPHONE CO. FOR BUSINESS SESSION STREET RIGHT OF WAY. CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION BACKGROUND: The attached deed from General Telephone Company is for right-of-way dedication on the easterly side of Desert Club Drive and northerly side of Avenida La Fonda. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: RECOMMENDATION: That the attached deed be accepted and authorized recordation. Submitted by: Approved for submission to ztC*i*: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANA ER BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`\ Order No. Escrow No. Loan No. WHEN*RECORDED MAIL TO: City of La *Ouinta 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, California 92253 FH. 619) 564-22*6 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: DOCUMENTARY TRANSFER TAX *............................... Computed on the consideration or value of property Conveyed; OR Same as above....................................................................Computed on the consideration or value less liens or encumbrances remaining at time of sale. Signature of D*larant or Agent determining tax Firm Name GRANT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, GTE California Incorporated, formerly known as General Telephone of California, a California Corporation hereby GRANT(S) to The City of La Quinta, a Municipal Corporation the real property in the City of La Quinta County of Riverside State of California, described as RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION *ASTERLY SIDE OF DESERT CLUB DRIVE AND NORTHERLY SIDE OF AVENIDA LA FONDA IN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA Those portions of Lots 73. 74 and 75 of Desert Club Tract Unit No. 4 as shown by map on file in Book 21, page 60, of Naps, Records of Riverside County1 California described as follows: BEGINNING at the Northwest corner of said Lot 73; said corner also being on the West line of Desert Club Drive having a half width of 25.00 feet) as shown on said map; THENCE along the North line of said Lot 73 North 89*5I'55" East a distance of 7.00 feet; THENCE along a line which Is parallel with and 32.00 feet Easterly of the centerline of said Desert Club Drive South O0*05'OO'* East a distance of 137.46 feet; THENCE South 50e161l9N East a distance of 23.38 feet to the beginning of a non-tangent curve concave to the North having a radius of 770.00 feet and to which point of beginning a radial line bears South 03e451p311 East; said curve also being concentric with and 30.00 feet Northerly of the centerline of Avenida La Fonda as shown on the aforementioned Tract Map; PAGE 1 OF 2 GTE California Incorporated Dated July 19. 19R9 STATE OF CALIFORNIA Iss. COUNTYOF Ventura G. W. Blake 0 Ju1y*l9. 1989 V ident Service Operations before me. the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, per- I*#* * sonaiiyappeareriG.W. Blake Vice President Service Operations and Kenneth K. Okel Assistant Secretary Okel Assistant Secretary personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory CE-*LWL evidence) to be the person(sl whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the YVONNE HERNANDEZ within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed I*: 11 WNwftA COINTY the same. * OiL I'. im 7; WITNESS my hand and oflicial seal, ITh S area for official notarlal Seal) Signatur 1002 G/82) AS At I ANt BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`] NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`^COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: Agreement with Coachella Valley Water District regarding costs associated with Assessment District 89-2 Phase II of the Cove Improvements). CONSENT CALENDAR: * STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The proposed agreement formalizes the understanding between the City and CVWD regarding costs associated with the installation of street, storm drain, water and sanitary sewer improvements in Phase II. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS*S: APPROVED BY: None beyond those associated with the Assessment District. RECOMMENDATION: Approval of agreement. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAG*;; FORM#OO1.ALL BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`_ AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into by and among the CITY OF LA QUINTA the CITY"), the LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY the AGENCY"), and the COACHEL*A VALLEY WATER DISTRICT the DISTRICT"). RECITALS A. The CITY is a municipal corporation duly organized pursuant to the general laws of the State of California. B. The AGENCY is a redevelopment agency, a public body, corporate and politic, duly created, established and authorized to transact business and exercise its powers, all under and pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law, California Health and Safety Code section 33000, et seq. C. The DISTRICT is a county water district organized and existing pursuant to California Water Code section 30000, et. seq. D. The CITY, the AGENCY and the DISTRICT wish to cooperate in undertaking a project for the construction of certain public improvements within the CITY, including domestic water facilities, sanitary sewer facilities, street improvements, and storm drains; each intends to contribute to the cost of some or all of these improvements through direct financial contribution, through assessment district financing and/or through the sale of bonds as hereinafter described. BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`a NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`b NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`c NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`d NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`e NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`f NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`g NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`h NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`i NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`j NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`k NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`l NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`mCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENflA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Agreement for Investment Services for 1915 Act Improvement Bond Issue BUSINESS SESSION: Proceeds of Assessment District No. 89-2 Sanitary Sewer System) CONSENT CALENDAR: Lp STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: With the upcoming Bond Issue for Asse*sment District No. 89-2 Sanitary Sewer System), the City Staff feel* a Bond Proceeds *ana*ement Program is necessitated. Services will include Investment Cash *:anaaomont Ad- visory Services, arbitrage reporting and compliance, and custodial ser- vices for third party safekeeping of*securities. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: * None: Payment of services to come from interest earnings. RECOMMENDATION: Approve through consent the Abritrage Rebate Calculation and Investment Services Agreement with Denman & Company. Submitted By: Approved for submission to City Council: 4* Ld(w)* Signature *on K'iedrowski, City Manager *C7 FORM 4002 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`n e at I MEMORANDUM *OF * TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, Assistant City Manage*/* DATE: July 17, 1989 SUBJECT: Agreement for Investment Services for 1915 Act Improvement Bond Issue Proceeds of Assessment District No. 89-2 Sanitary Sewer System) As the City Council is aware, the City is preparing for the Bond issue of approximately $2.1 million dollars for sanitary sewer improvements to the Cove area. Like the series 1989 Bonds, recently issued by the Redevelopment Agency, this new issue of the City is subject to the Tax Reform Act of 1986. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 has changed the environment in which tax exempt bond proceeds are managed. The provisions of the Federal tax law now include requirements for arbitrage monitoring, reporting and rebate, which, if not complied with, can result in potentially severe penalties. These penalties can ultimately include the loss of an issue's tax exempt status retroactive to the date of issuance. Recognizing the importance of the tax law Provisions and the administrative burden that will be placed on the City, the staff has solicited investment advisory services for a Bond Proceeds Management Program. The purpose of this program will be to alleviate the City of the record keeping and reporting provisions of the tax act and assist in optimizing the earnings capabilities of the Bond proceeds funds. Attached as Exhibit A is Arbitrage Rebate Calculation and Investment Services Agreement with Denman & Company. Q BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`o NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`p NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`q NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`r NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`s NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`t NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`u *a*4*uuit'ai COUNCIL MEETING DATE AUGUST 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY ITEM TITLE ACCEPTANCE OF DEED TO PUBLIC HEARING WELL SITE AT NORTHEAST BUSINESS SESSION OF FRITZ BURNS PARK I CONSENT CALENDAR STUDY SESSION BACKGROUND: As a result of staff communication with Coachella Valley Water District regarding the well site northeast of the Fritz Burns Park, the attached deed has been received. The resolution of the District indicates that the well site is being deeded in exchange for a future well site to be mutually agreed upon. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: RECOMMENDATION: That the attached deed be accepted. Submitted by: Approved for submission to Ci* Council: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MAN*y /7 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`vNo Recording Fees Required Per Government Code Section 27383 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT Post Office Box 1058 Coachella, California 92236 Space above this line is for Recorders Use) 0652.1 GRANT DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, a Public Agency of the State of California, does hereby Grant to the CITY OF LA QUINTA, a Municipal Corporation, that certain real property in the County of Riverside, State of California, described as follows: That portion of the Southwest quarter of Section 6, Township 6 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Meridian described as follows: BEGINNING at a point on the South line of said Section 6, which bears North 8904213091 East, a distance of 821.13 feet from the Southwest corner of said Section 6; THENCE1 North O0*O5*O0** West and parallel with the West line of said Section 6, a distance of 395.00 feet; THENCE, South 8904213019 West, a distance of 10.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE, continuing South 8904213011 West, 90.00 feet; THENCE, North 0000510011 West, 100.00 feet; THENCE, North 8904213011 East, 90.00 feet; THENCE, South 00*O5I00,* East, 100.00 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. 0.21 acres, more or less. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) 95. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE) On this 23rd day of Mav 19_89 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared Keith H. Ainsworth K ith H. Ains orth personally known to me Assistant General Manager * Date: May 23, 1989 to be the person who executed the within instrument as As*istant General Mana*er BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`w NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`x NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`yCOUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Authorize call for bids for Median Landscape Maintenance Services for Avenue 54 and Madison Street BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: See attached Memorandum FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: Estimated $70,000 RECOMMENDATION: Authorize call for bids. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER FORM#001 ALL BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`z0 z MEMORANDUM TO: Ronald L. Kiedrowski, City Manager FROM: Frank Reynolds, Director of Public Work* DATE: July 20, 1989 SUBJECT: Contracting for Landscape Maintenance Services We took over the responsibility for maintenance of the medians around the perimeter of PGA West on January 1, 1989 and since that time two items have become readily apparent. First, we are not capable with the crew we have to do an adequate job of maintaining the mile and a half of landscaping involved, and secondly, even if we added personnel to be able to bring the level of service up to where it has to be, we could not do the work as inexpensively as private landscaping contractors. This latter has been borne out by informal bids received which indicate that a private contractor's cost would be nearly half that of ours. The primary reason for this is that the prevailing wage for a landscape gardener is $5.00 per hour. We can't compete with that and still maintain the versatility we need in our personnel. Therefore, we are recommending that we follow the pattern which has been set by the City of Palm Desert. That agency contracts with independent landscaping contractors for its medians on Fred Waring, Monterey and Highway 111 and is satisfied with the arrangement. Obviously, this sort of activity has to be monitored by City personnel, but we feel that in the long run it's a more effective way in which to achieve the desired results and at the same time give the City-wide Lighting and Landscaping District the best deal it can get. It is requested that the City Council authorize the call for bids for landscape maintenance services. Bids would be opened on August 29 and brought to the Council's first meeting in September. BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: REQUEST FROM RICK JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION BUSINESS SESSION: FOR APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICE FLAGS) FOR STARLIGHT DUNES CONSENT CALENDAR: SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND STUDY SESSION: STARLIGHT LANE IN THE R-1-9000, ZONE. BACKGROUND: The Applicant is requesting approval to install 10 advertising flags along Fred Waring Drive and Starlight Lane. Grading has recently begun on the property. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Consider the request of the Applicant and take action by minute motion. Submitted by: Approved for submission to Ci*Counci%: Signature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANA$j BJ/CC#8/1.F4 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` 0 MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: AUGUST 1, 1989 SUBJECT: REQUEST FROM RICK JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION FOR APPROVAL OF A SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVISE FLAGS) FOR STARLIGHT DUNES SUBDIVISION LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND STARLIGHT LANE IN THE R-1-9000 ZONE BACKGROUND Municipal Code Chapter 5.64 Special Advertising Devices", provides for a permit to be issued by the City Council for advertising devices other than the usual and customary permanent business identification signs. This includes items such as flags. REQUEST The Applicant is requesting approval of ten advertising flags for Tract *23773 which is presently being graded. Six flags are proposed along Fred Waring Drive, with four flags proposed for Starlight Lane, evenly spaced between Fred Waring Drive and Galaxy Drive to the north. The flags proposed would be two feet wide by six feet tall on PVC poles with a maximum height of 16-feet. The flags would be multicolored, alternating between royal blue, sky blue and peach 2 feet X 1 foot panels). Attached is a letter and plan from the Applicant explaining his request. DISCUSSION 1. Recently grading began on the subdivision. BJ/MEMOSS. 001 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON BUSINESS SESSION: NEW UNIT TYPE AT PGA WEST, SALES FACILITY EXPANSION, AND TIME EXTENSION CONSENT CALENDAR: FOR SALES FACILITY. STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission on July 11, 1989 granted a five year time extension for the sales facility at FGA West, granted an addition to the sales facility, and approved two new unit types to be constructed within the Model Complex and sales facility within PGA West development. The new units are called the Medalists a two-story 6-plex) and the Highlands a single-story condominium). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: By minute motion accept for file this report of action taken by the Planning Commission. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: gnat RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER BJ/CC*8/l.F3 /ij BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` a*4*auit'ai MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: AUGUST 1, 1989 SUBJECT: REPORT OF ACTION ON NEW UNIT TYPE AT PGA WEST, EXPANSION OF THE SALES FACILITY AND TIME EXTENSION BACKGROUND Plot Plan #85-203, for the temporary sales facility, was approved on October 1, 1985. Subsequent time extensions have extended the approval period. The permit will expire October 1, 1989, unless an extension is granted. The Applicant requested a time extension for the sales facility, sales facility expansion, and approval to introduce two new unit types the Medalists and the Highlands) for construction within PGA West. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION The Planning Commission approved the Applicant*s request on July 11, 1989 as follows: 1. Approved a five year time extension for Plot Plan No. 85-203; 2. Granted the additional sales facility building and model unit construction for the Medalists and Highlands units adjacent to the sales complex; and 3. Required the Applicant to submit a detailed landscaping plan, to the Planning and Development Department for review and approval, of the sales/model complex prior to the issuance of a final occupancy permit. COUNCIL ACTION By minute motion accept for file, this report of action taken by the Planning Commission. Attachments: Unit Plans Site Plan Planning Commission Staff report BJ/MEMOJH.004 1- BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: SIGN APPLICATION #89-086; VARIANCE BUSINESS SESSION: #89-008, AND CONFIRMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT #89-130. CONSENT CALENDAR: II APPLICATION REQUESTING THREE IDENTIFICATION SIGNS FOR CACTUS FLOWER STUDY SESSION: RESIDENTIAL PROJECT. VARIANCE NO. 89-008 APPLICATION REQUESTING ILLUMINATION OF ALL THREE SIGNS. BACKGROUND: Application requesting three identifi*ation signs for Cactus Flower residential project. Variance No. 89-008 application requesting illumination of all three signs. The Subdivision is located southeast of the corner of Fred Waring Drive and Dune Palms Road. The Planning Commission considered the matter on July 11, 1981, and recommended approval of the Sign Application with modifications and Variance and approval of the Environmental Assessment. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: By minute motion accept for file this report of the action taken by the Planning Commission. Submitted by: Approved for submission to Cit Council: Signature BJ/CCit8/1 F6 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: AUGUST 1, 1989 APPLICANT: WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION PROJECT: SIGN APPLICATION NO. 89-086, APPLICATION REQUESTING THREE IDENTIFICATION SIGNS FOR CACTUS FLOWER RESIDENTIAL PROJECT REFER TO STAFF REPORT, ATTACHMENT NO. 3); VARIANCE NO. 89-008, APPLICATION REQUESTING ILLUMINATION OF ALL THREE SIGNS LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND DUNE PALMS ROAD REFER TO STAFF REPORT ATTACHMENT NO. 1 AND 2) ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION SIGN APPLICATION NO. 89-086 IS EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT OF 1970 CEQA) AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 15303. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 89-130 WAS PREPARED FOR VARIANCE NO. 89-008. THE INITIAL STUDY INDICATED THAT SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS WILL NOT OCCUR DUE TO THE PROPOSAL. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION HAS THEREFORE BEEN PREPARED. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION/RECOMMENDATION: On July 11, 1989, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the subject applications. The Planning Commission, at the conclusion of the hearing approved by minute motion, 3-0-1 with Lucia Moran abstaining, Sign Application No. 89-086, subject to the following conditions: 1. A maximum of two signs shall be allowed for both Tentative Tract No. 22982 and Tentative Tract No. 24208. BJ/MEMOGL. 001 1- BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`COUNCIL MEETING DATE: AUGUST 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON BUSINESS SESSION: PLOT PLAN NO. 89-417 APPROVAL OF COMMERCIAL COMPLEX CONSISTING OF 10,250 CONSENT CALENDAR: SQUARE FEET RESTAURANT AND 10,000 SQUARE FOOT OFFICE BUILDING IN THE STUDY SESSION: C-P-S ZONE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111, APPROXIMATELY 1,200 FEET WEST OF WASHINGTON STREET. BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission on July 25', 1989, on a 4-0-1 Chairman Walling abstaining) vote, approved a Plot Plan application to allow a commercial complex consisting of a restaurant and office on a site adjacent to the west side of Point Happy on the north side of Highway 111 west of Washington Street. Two people spoke in favor of the project with no one in opposition. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Restaurant will generate Sales Tax. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: By minute motion accept for file this report of action taken by the Planning Commission. Submitted. by: Approved for submission to City Council: Signature BJ/CC*8/1 F8 BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` fr* 0 MEMORANDUM * TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: AUGUST 1, 1989 SUBJECT: REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON PLOT PLAN NO* 89-417, A COMMERCIAL COMPLEX, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111, WEST OF WASHINGTON STREET APPLICANT: T S RESTAURANTS ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS: ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT NO. 89-129 HAS BEEN PREPARED IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS APPLICATION. THE INITIAL STUDY INDICATED THAT POSSIBLE SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS MAY OCCUR IN THE FOLLOWING AREAS: EARTH, LIGHT AND GLARE, LAND USE, TRANSPORTATION, AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL REMAINS. MITIGATION MEASURES, PERTAINING TO THESE ITEMS HAVE BEEN MADE A PART OF THIS PROJECT AND WILL REDUCE THE IMPACTS TO AN INSIGNIFICANT LEVEL, AND THEREFORE, A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED. BACKGROUND: Plot Plan No. 89-417 is an application for a commercial complex consisting of a 10,250 square foot, two-story restaurant and separate 10,000 square foot two-story office building. The site is zoned C-P-S and is adjacent to the west side of Point Happy on the north side of Highway 111, 1200 feet west of Washington Street. The attached Planning Commission Staff report describes the project in detail. The Planning Commission considered this request at the meeting of June 26, 1989. The Applicant requested clarification or modification to a number of the proposed conditions. After consideration, the Commission modified Condition Nos. 2, 4, 8, 11, 13, 17, y9 and added Condition Nos. 21 and 22. See attached final Conditions of Approval.) PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The Planning Commission approved Plot Plan No. 89-417, subject to conditions on a 4-0-1 vote with Chairman Walling abstaining. BJ/MEMOSS.003 1- BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`RECOMMENDATION: By minute motion accept for file the report of action taken by the Planning Commission approving Plot Plan No. 89-417. Attachments: 1. Final Conditions of Approval 2. Planning Commission Staff report 3. Plans and Exhibits for project BJ/MEMOSS 003 2- BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`COUNCIL MEETING DATE: August 1, 1989 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Approval Agreement for Accounting BUSINESS SESSION: Services with Charmian Iwen. CONSENT CALENDAR: /5 STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: Presented for approval by the City Council is a month by month contract for accounting services. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Per approved budget APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Agreement for Accounting Services. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: Q/Ldw(" Signature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER FORM#OO1 ALL BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` 0 * z MEMORANDUM TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBER OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: TOM P. GENOVESE, ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER DATE: JULY 19, 1989 SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR ACCOUNTING SERVICES Attached is an Agreement for Accounting Services with Charmian Iwen. This Agreement is the same as the current Agreement in effect and as approved by the City Council at the May 16, 1989 meeting with the exception of compensation. The attached Agreement represents an increase of 5% in the compensation. The funds for this Agreement are budgeted in the salaries line item in the Finance Department for the 1989/90 Fiscal Year. Recommended Action: Approval of the Agreement for Accounting Services with Chairman Iwen. if; BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` *:**)4@vY' QA c,t*fr *,, Q4'q** CLAIM OF GEORGE MIERS AMENDED & ASSOCIATES CLAIM FOR MONEY DAMAGES F', vs. CITY OF LA QUINTA TO THE CITY OP LA QUINTA: George Miers & Associates GMA") hereby makes claim against the City of La Quinta City") and makes the following statements in support of its claim: 1. Claimant's post office address is: George Miers & Associates 420 Sutter Street San Francisco, California 94108 2. Notices concerning the claim should be sent to the following address: Mark T. Kawa, Esg. Ervin, Cohen & Jessup 9401 Wilshire Boulevard Ninth Floor Beverly Hills, California 90212 3. The contract giving rise to this claim was entered into in or about August 1988, in the City of La Quinta, State of California. 4. The circumstances giving rise to this claim are as follows: a) In or about November 1987, the City solicited bids from various architectural firms in connection with the BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`development of a Civic Center. This Civic Center project was to be undertaken in two phases, the first of which was to include programming and master planning of all Civic Center buildings and schematic design services for the City Hall an* Council Chamber Phase I"). The second phase of the architectural commission was to entail design development, construction documents and construction administration in connection with the construction of the City Hall Administration Building and Council Chamber Phase II"). Both Phases were interdependent, but since the exact scope of work of the second Phase would not be known until the first was completed, the City requested that the various architectural firms submit a single bid referencing costs attributable to only Phase I and an estimate for the Design Development portion of Phase II. In reliance on this understanding, GMA submitted a proposal which included a single bid for Phase I of the Civic Center project and a fee estimate for the Design Development portion of Phase II. The bid for Phase I services included a substantial discount in the billing rates charged for the firm's principals. The discounted billing rates were made available to the City during Phase I only because GMA would be compensated at its normal and customary billing rates for Phase II services performed by principals of GMA. GMA specifically 2- K; BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`called attention to this fee arrangement in its written proposal to the City, and representatives of the City subsequently assured George Miers, a principal of GMA, that they understood and agreed to the fee arrangement, as it applied to both Phase I and Phase II. b) GMA's proposal was accepted by the City sometime in August 1988. At that time, Murrel Crump, the then-acting City Planning Director and the person chiefly responsible for overseeing the Civic Center project, orally assured Mr. Miers that GMA's services had been retained for both Phase I and Phase II of the Civic Center project. c) on August 22, 1988, Mr. Crump requested that Mr. Miers submit 3 copies of GMA's proposed written contract for its professional services. On August 25, 1988, Mr. Niers submitted the requested contract in person. The contract specifically addressed both Phases of the project. GNA began work on Phase I of the project based on the City Council's formal approval of the firm in September 1988 and Mr. Crump's oral authorization to proceed. As work was performed, GMA submitted invoices to the City for its services, and the City made the corresponding payments. d) During the period between September 1988 and May 1989, Mr. Crump, Mr. Kiedrowski, the City Manager, and Mr. Miers had numerous conversations in which Mr. Miers was assured 3- BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` 1 SCHWARTZ, WEISS & CARUTHERS D. MICHAEL CARUTHERS City of La Qujnt* 2 500 South Palm Canyon Drive Suite 215 JVL 1 239 3 Palm Springs, CA 92264 619) 320-6277 * rI*ri* 4 5 6 Attorneys for Claimants 7 8 SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 FOR THE COtYNTY OF RIVERSIDE 10 * GILBERT OLSON and DIANE OLSON, CLAIM FOR DAMAGES 12 Claimants, Government Code Section 910) 13 vs- 14 CITY OF LA QUINTA, 15 Defendants. 16 17 TO: THE CITY OF LA QUINTA: 18 YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that Claimants, GILBERT OLSON and 19 DIANE OLSON, hereby present this claim for damages against the 20 City of La Quinta. 21 The following statements are made in reference to this claim: 22 1. Notices concerning this claim should be sent to D. MICHAEL 23 CARUTHERS, Attorney at Law, SCHWARTZ, WEISS & CARUTHERS, 500 South 24 Palm Canyon Drive, Suite 215, Palm Springs, California 92262. 25 Telephone: 619) 320-6277. 26 2. The occurrence giving rise to this claim took place on 27 or about January 23, 1989 on Fred Waring Drive. 28 3. On or about January 23, 1989 and prior thereto the City BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"`1 of La Quinta did create a dangerous condition of public property by 2 designing and building said roadway such as to cause a defective 3 and dangerous condition of public property. 4 4. Said dangerous condition consisted of a negligent and 5 careless construction of the eastbound curbed lane of Fred Waring 6 Drive at approximately 300 feet west of California Drive. 7 5. Said roadway was dangerous and defective in that the 8 roadway was too narrow and improperly marked. 9 6. Additionally, the curb was improperly constructed, there 10 failed to exist proper signs providing for safe bicycle traffic 11 and/or restricting bicycle traffic and there failed to be a proper 12 and/or adequate bicycle lane such as to constitute a defective and 13 dangerous condition of public property. 14 7. The City of La Quinta and/or its employees failed to warn 15 the public of the aforementioned dangerous conditions. 16 8. The City of La Quinta failed to repair, correct or guard 17 against the public becoming involved in accidents as a result of the 18 above mentioned dangerous conditions. 19 9. As a result of the above mentioned acts and failures to 20 act on behalf of the City of La Quinta and/or their employees, 21 Claimant, GILBERT OLSON, was caused to fall to the ground and suffer 22 fractured bones, serious physical injury, emotional distress and 23 mental distress. 24 10. As a result of the above mentioned acts and failures to 25 act on behalf of the city of La Quinta, and/or their employees, 26 Claimant, DIANE OLSON, suffered a loss of consortium arising out of 27 the serious bodily injury suffered by her husband, GILBERT OLSON, 28 as stated herein above. BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02 i^"` NOTEXTPAGE BIB] 11-20-1998-U01 10:36:11AM-U01 CC-U02 08-U02 01-U02 1989-U02