1990 05 15 CCd_u(i'tZZThThZ;2Z
ZiiuiniAZC)ili14ttZ1
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA
CITY COUNCIL CZAMBERS
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California 92253
Regular Meeting
May 15, 1990 7:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER Beginning Reso. No. 90-37
Ord. No. 172
a. Pledge of AllegiancZ
b. Roll Call
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
PRESENTATION OF LA QUINTA BEAUTIFUL AWARDS FOR MAY
MOZT' BEAUTIFUL: Charles & Henrietta Emigh, Z
MOST IMPROVED: William & Nancy Krause, 54-455 AveniZa Madero
ANNOUNCEMENTS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
a. Letter from Coachella Valley Mountains Trust requesting support of
SB2862 regarding a Mountains Conseryancy
BUSINESS SESSION
1. Consideration of Street Name Change for Avenue 50 to Andy
Williams Drive and Avenue 52 to Frank Capra Drive.
a) Resolution Action.
2. Consideration of Adoption of Art in Public Places Ordinance.
a) Motion to take up Ordinance No.Zby title and number
only and waiver further reading.
to Introduce Ordinance No. on first reading.
t/ Z-6 Z
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( 3. Approval of Agreement with Desert Sands School District Regarding
Sports Complex.
a) Minute Order Action.
4. Consideration of Request of Property Owners North of Avenue 58 and
West of Madison Street to Annex to the City of La Quinta.
a) Minute Order Action.
5. Progress Report Bermuda Dunes Annexation.
6. Report on City Hall Construction Costs.
7. Second Reading of Ordinance No. 170 re: Fencing Regulations
Ordinance No. 171 re: Loitering
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of Demand Register.
2. Approval of Minutes of April 17 & April 25, 1990.
Z Z`? 3. Adoption of Resolution Authorizing Temporary Closure of Calle Estado
Gri Ma;Z 23, 1990 fLZoZ 5:00 P.M. to 9:00 P.M. for Chamber Mi."Zr.
4. Acceptance of Dedication of Two Parcels of Right-of-Way for a
Segment of New Avenue 52 Between Washington Street and the Westerly
Boundary of Tract #24890.
5. Adoption of Resolution Establishing Eisenhower Drive and Calle
Colima a 4-Way Stop.
6. Approval of Final Map 24208 and Approval of Subdivision Improvement
Agreement Williams La Quinta II South of Cactus Flower on Dune
Palms Road.
7. Approval of Parcel Map 25187 Thornburg Northeast of Sagebrush
and Northwest of Evacuation Channel.
8. Acceptance of Report of Planning Commission Action on Plot Plan
89-417 Amendment #1 Amendment to a Plot Plan to Construct a
Commercial Complex Restaurant & Office) Located on the North Side
of Highway 111, Approximately 1200 feet West of Washington St.
Applicant: T. S. Enterprises.
9. Approval of In-Lieu Park Fee Proposal for Tentative Tract No. 24950
Applicant: Chong B. Lee.
10. Approval of Purchase of Computer Equipment.
11. Approval of Special Advertising Device 90-004 to Allow Flags and
Directional Signs for Cactus Flower Project Tract 22982).
Applicant: Williams Development Corporation.
A
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(12. Approval of Special Advertising Device 90-005 to Allow Flags for
Rancho Ocotillo Project Tract 24517). Applicant: Williams
Development Corporation.
13. Approval of Special AdvertiZing Dc'ZIZe 90-006 for Tract 25389.
Applicant: Brock Homes.
14. Approval of Plans and Specifications for Median Island Landscaping
on Jefferson Street from Highway 111 to Westward Ho Drive and
Authorization to Call for Bids.
15. Approval of Plans and Specifications for Washington Street Widening
from Highway 111 to South of Highland Palms and Authorization to
Call for Bids.
COUNCIL COMMENT
PUBLIC COMMENT
CLOSED SESSION
a. Discussion of Litigation
Parc La Quinta Indio Case No. 60188
b. Discussion of Land Acquisition Through Eminent Domain
Burkett Property Indlo Case No. 60203
c. Discussion of Other Land Acquistions
ADJOURNMENT
STUDY SESSION AGENDA
MAY 14, 1990 3:00 P.M.
NOTE: Action may be taken on any of the following items during the
regularly scheduled Council Meeting of Tuesday, May 15, 1990.
1. Review of Goals, Personnel, Services and Supplies? Equipment and
Capital Projects for 1990/91.
2. Discussion of Art in Public Places Ordinance.
3. Discussion of Proposal to Adopt a Sister City Program.
4. Discussion of Proposed Water Conservation Element of the General
Plan.
5. Discussion of Summer Calendar.
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS
a. City Manager
b. Assistant City Manager
C. Administrative Services Director
Z. Community Safety Director
e. Planning Director.
f. Public Works Director.
REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
a. Planning Commission Minutes of April 24, 1990.
b. Community Services Commission Minutes of March 26 and April 30, 1990.
c. CVAG Committee Reports.
NOTICE OF UPCOMING MEETINGS AND EVENTS
May 14, 1990 CC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
May 15, 1990 CC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
May 29, 1990 CC Special Meeting 7:00 P.M.
Phase III Cove
Improvements
May 30, 1990 CSC Regular Lv:.eetiZa 7:00 P.M.
June 3, 1990 CC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
June 4, 1990 CC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
June 5, 1990 ELECTION DAY-POLLS OPEN 7 A.M.- 8 P.M.
June 11, 1990 PC Study Session 4:00 P.M.
June 12, 1990 PC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
June 18, 1990 CC Study Session 3:00 P.M.
June 19, 1990 CC Regular Meeting 7:00 P.M.
CC City Council
PC Planning Commission
CSC Community Services Commission
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Saundra L. Juhola, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, do hereby
declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of May
15, 1990 was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-105
Calle Estado and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Post Office on
Friday, May 11, 1990.
Daj)d: May 11, 1990.
G<A><ZAL.JUH,CitjC1erk
City of La Quinta, California j(
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( x COUNCIL COMMENTS
REGARDING
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ORDINANCE
1. Does the Ordinance clearly state who is responsible for
art maintenance?
2. Can fees be made retroactive? affect on approved plot
plans, tract maps, etc.).
3. What will insurance cost?
4. Does the Ordinance allow the City to replace art pieces
if it becomes out of date or inappropriate?
5. Cannot support commitment of $250,000 in trust account.
Could dedicate the average interest or said amount to be
used for implementation or budget flat fee.
6. Identify minimum fee to be collected.
7. Change Section 2.65.080 A-2 to reflect that durability
shall take into account location of art work.
8. Change Section 2.65.080 A-S to replace the word
Z to tYappropriately!I.
BJ/DOCJH.041 1 4
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(9. change Section 2.65.070 E to replace the second shall"
with may". Review Ordinance and change shall" with
should" or may" if appropriate.
COMMITTEE COMMENTS
1. Separate maintenance repair costs from administrative
cost identified in Section 2.65.110 c-6.
2. Could identify a percentage in administrative cost in
Section 2.65.110 C-6 per each fee collected or set
maximum amount each year like their draft provisions.
BJ/DOCJH.041 2
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(May 15, 1990
Honorable Mayor John Pena,
Councilmembers and
Friends
The Grand Lady of La Quinta had her 90th birthday. Her accomplishments
are many:
First secretary of the Chamber of Commerce of La Quinta
Donated Jaws of Life to La Quinta Fire Department
Donated children's play area equipment at Community Park
Donated the picnic area cover and tables
Donated the mini park on Eisenhower
Major donor to successful incorporation effort
Donated to Casa Colima Crippled Children's School
Donated to Animal Samaritan
Donated to Blind Dogs of the Desert
Donated Recovery Building at Living Desert in Palm Desert.
Frances Hack is now at Eisenhower Medical Center in I.C.U. Two pints
of blood have been administered to her and need replacement. Anyone
from La Quinta giving blood, please give it in her name. She has done
so much for us, this is our chance to show our gratitude by blood
donations and prayers.
Frances has done all these things without fanfare and has touched all
our lives. She deserves some Sort of permanent tribute in her honor
while she's here to know about it.
Dedicate the new library, the new school or a park in her name.
Frances Hack is fighting for her life. Let's help her make the grade!
Respectfully,
MARGARET MIELE
U
7
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( cZ: OC@.ir/ZZ
ZRITTZ COMMUNICATION: a CITYOFLAWAETA
Z Z 199(3
April 24, 1990
Mayor John Pena
MernberZ of City Council
City of La Quinta
P.O. Box 1504
La Quinta, CA. 92253
Honorable Body:
Again I am communicating with you to request assistance in the
formation of our Mountains Conservancy.
We would appreciate a letter of support for SB2862, sent to:
Senator Robert Presley
State Capital, Room 4048
Sacramento, CA. 95814
This letter should be sent immediately, allowing for support
to the Bill now in process.
Thank you for your attention to this important matter.
Sincerely,
Ray Baca
President
Board of Directors
7,
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u
( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( MEMORANDUM
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSIDERATION OF STREET NAME CHANGE FOR BUSINESS SESSION:
50TH AVENUE TO ANDY WILLIAMS DRIVE AND
52ND AVENUE TO FRANK CAPRA DRIVE. CONSENT CALENDAR:
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission at their meeting of March 13, 1990, after
public testimony and discussion, by minute motion, voted 3-2 to
recommend the street names as noted above.
Fl SCAt. IMPLICATIONS:
None
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
The recommendation of the Planning Commission is now before the
City Council for action.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
BJ/CCZ5/01 F2
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: MAY 1, 1990
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF STREET NAME CHANGE FOR 50TH
AVENUE TO ANDY WILLIAMS DRIVE AND 52ND AVENUE TO
FRANK CAPRA DRIVE.
BACKGROUND:
In December, 1989, the City Council referred to the Planning
Commission a request to rename 50th Avenue to Andy Williams
Drive. The Commission adopted a Resolution setting the Public
Hearing for March 13, 1990. The Commission also added street
name change considerations for 52nd Avenue and 54th Avenue.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The Commission, considered public testimony, written letters
and petitions at the Public Hearing h6ld on March 13; 1990.
The Commission on a vote of 3-2 recommended to the City Council
that 50th Avenue be changed to Andy Williams Boulevard and 52nd
Avenue be changed to Frank Capra Drive. Further, the
Commission requested that the City Council request that the
Community Services Commission consider names of historical
people for other streets, parks, etc.
COUNCIL ACTION:
The recommendation of the Planning Commission is now before the
City Council for action.
Attachment:
1. Planning Commission report
2. Petitions and letters, support and opposition
3. Planning Commission minutes for March 13, 1990, meeting.
BJ/MEMOJH.066 1 j
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF rHE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING A CHANGE
OF STREET NAMES FOR 50TH AVENUE & 52ND AVENUE.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta,
did on the 1st day of May, 1990, consider a street name change
for 50th Avenue to Andy Williams Drive, and 52nd Avenue to
Frank Capra Drive; and
WHEREAS, the City Council did consider the
recommendation of the Planning Commission to change said street
names;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council
of the City of La Quinta, California as follows:
1. That the above recitations are true and constitute
the action of the council in this case;
2. That it does hereby approve the change of street
name from 50th Avenue to Andy Williams Boulevard
and 52nd Avenue to Frank Capra Drive for those
portions of streets now within the City and for
those portions annexed into the City in the future.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting
of the La Quinta City Council, held on this day of
1990, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
JOHN PENA, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
CS/RESOCC. 002 1-
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u ( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u!(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH PUBLIC HEARING:
DESERT SANDS SCHOOL DISTRICT REGARDING
THE SPORTS COMPLEX. BUSINESS SESSION: 3
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Attached you will find the agreement with Desert Sands School District
for the Sports Complex. It is important that the City have more
control of the maintenance and operation of these facilities.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATrON:
By minute motion, authorize the City Manager to sign the agreement
with Desert Sands School District.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
Signature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u"(3>12,,> %Z
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City
Council
FROM: Ronald L. Kiedrowski1 City Manager
DATE: May 15, 1990
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF AGREEMENT WITH DESERT SANDS SCHOOL
DISTRICT REGARDING THE SPORTS COMPLEX.
BACKGROUND:
Now that the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District
will only be paying for the utility costs of the ball fields
at the Sports Complex, it is time for the City to be more
involved in the operation of these facilities.
The City needs to have more control over the maintenance
and operations of these areas.
This will insure that the residents have good quality
facilities for their use.
CITY COUNCIL ACTION:
Move to approve the agreement with Desert Sands School
District regarding the Sports Complex.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Agreement
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u#( AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is entered into this day
of 1990, by and between DESERT SANDS UNIFIED
SCHOOL DISTRICT hereinafter referred to as DistrictZ' and
the CITY OF LA QUINTA, a municipal corporation of the State
of California, hereinafter referred to as *`City."
WHEREAS, pursuant to the LEASE AGREEMENT titled DESERT
SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT LA QUINTA JOINT-USE LEASE
SPORTS COMPLEX) and LEASE AGREEMENT TITLED DESERT SANDS
UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT LA QUINTA JOINT-USE LEASE ADJACENT
PARK LANDS) the operations and maintenance of facilities
addressed in said Agreements shall be decided annually in
accordance with provisions 17 and 11 of the Agreements.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the provisions of
the Agreements addressed herein, the parties agree as
follows:
1. City shall be responsible for all fertilization and
weed control at sites. Fertilization methods and materials
used shall be at the determination of the City but shall,
at all times, cause all vegetation to be alive, healthy and
free of infestation to a standard similar to that of the
District.
2. City shall be responsible for insect control at
Sites. Insect control methods and materials used shall be
at the determination of the City but shall1 at all times,
cause all vegetation to be alive, healthy, and free of
infestation to a standard similar to that of the District.
3. City shall be responsible for care and maintenance of
all ball infields including grade, mix of materials, and
quantity of fill. Methods of maintenance shall be at the
determination of the City but shall, at all times, cause
all ball infields to be safe for play and use.
4. City shall be responsible for all maintenance and
scheduling of the restrooms and concession buildings.
Methods and materials of maintenance shall be at the
determination of the City but shall, at all times, cause Z
all facilities to be in operational and safe condition.
All supplies for maintenance and operation of facilities
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u$( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u%( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u&( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u'( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u((COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MAY 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF PROPERTY BUSINESS SESSION:
OWNERS NORTH OF 58TH AVENUE AND WEST OF
MADISON STREET TO ANNEX TO THE CITY OF CONSENT CALENDAR:
LA QUINTA.
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Property owners north of 58th Avenue and west of Madison Street, have
submitted petitions requesting annexation. The property owners
request contains approximately 100 acres. The property is within the
City's sphere of of influence. This could be part of Annexation 47.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
This matter is before the City Council for your direction.
SubmittedZ by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
ignatu RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
BJ/CC#3/6 F6
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u)( JAMES G. MOTrER
47059 Marrakesh Drive
Palm Desert, CA 92260
619) 568-6312 LZZTV OF Z IWINTA
MAR 1 Z i99(1
Z1Y MANAGER
March 9, 1990
The Honorable Mayor John Pena
and City Council Members
City of La Quinta
P. 0. Box 1504
La Quinta, CA 92253
Dear Mayor Pena and City Council Members:
I am one of the owners of a 20-acre parcel of land on
58th Avenue which we wish to have annexed into your fine city.
We respectfully request that you consider putting this
annexation matter on the calendar for a Council Meeting in the
near Z
Attached is a map which indicates the parcel to be con-
sidered.
Thank you in advance.
Sincerely,
JGM: E
Enclosure
Z
&
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u*( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u+( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u,( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u-(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MAY 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
PROGRESS REPORT ON BERMUDA DUNES BUSINESS SESSION:
ANNEXATION.
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Staff has continued to work on the Bermuda Dunes Annexation. Council
direction is needed to continue.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
The matter is before the Council for direction.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
7 City Council:
*SZgnaturq'% RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
I
BJ/CCZ5/15 F7
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u.( MEMORANDUM
TO: THE HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: MAY 15, 1990
SUBJECT: BERMUDA DUNES ANNEXATION
Currently, the City has received about 10% favorable annexation
responses. Based upon State Annexation Law, the City has the
following options:
1. Submit a Sphere of Influence Amendment request to LAFCO.
This would include a City of Indio Amendment to eliminate
there sphere boundary north of 1-10. If our Sphere
Amendment is approved by LAFCO, other cities would have a
difficult time annexing.
2. Continue pursuing the joint sphere of influence amendment
and annexation application. In order to make application
petition from property owners representing 5% of- the
assessed value is needed. We exceed this limit. This
process will take more time to get an application to
LAFCO whereby we may have to react to any private
submittals.
Below is a preliminary list of actions needed for processing
each of the above noted requests:
SPHERE OF INFLUENCE
1. Prepare Sphere of Influence Amendment with legal
description.
2. Complete Sphere of Influence application.
3. Submit completed application to LAFCO.
4. LAFCO action taken.
5. Notice of LAFCO action sent to City.
BJ/MEMOJH.072 1
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u/(SPHERE OF INFLUENCE AMENDMENT AND ANNEXATION
1. Conduct public hearings before the Planning Commission
and City Council on pre annexation zoning and General Plan
Amendments. Adopt Resolution and Ordinance for
Amendments. Prepare fiscal impact study.
2. Prepare Sphere of Influence Amendment and Annexation map
with legal description.
3. Complete Sphere of Influence and Annexation applications.
4. Submit completed application to LAFCO.
5. LAFCO conducts hearing.
6. LAFCO action taken.
7. Identify City as conducting authority.
8. City holds hearing and adopts Resolution.
Separate Sphere of Influence Amendment and Annexation could
take from three to six months each to complete. The Sphere of
Influence and Annexation Amendment together could take six
months to one year to complete.
RECOMMENDATION:
This matter is before the Council for direction.
Cs?
BJ/MEMOJH.072 2
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u0( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u1( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u2( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u3( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u4( BUSINESS SESSION IThZi NO. 7
CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE NO. 170
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY UZ ZA ZuIZjZA, CALIFORNIA
AMENDING CHAPTER 9.42 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE ZONING ORDINANCE).
CASE NO: ZOA #89-009
The City Council of the City of La Quinta,
California does ordain as follow:
SECTION 1. City of La Quinta Municipal Code Title 9
Riverside County Ordinance No. 348 adopted by reference by this
City Council in Ordinance No. 5, operative August 29, 1982) is
hereby amended by replacing Section 9.42.070 concerning fencing
in the Special Residential SR) Zone, as set forth in Exhibit
A", attached hereto.
SECTION 2. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within
15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted
in at least the three 3) public places designated by resolution
of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting
of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and it's
certification, together with proof Zf posting, to be entered in
the Book of Ordinances of this City.
The foregoing ordinance was approved and adopted at a
meeting of the City Council held on the day of
1990, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
JOHN J. PENA, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
SAUNDRA JUHOLA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney RON KIEDROWSKI, City Manager
City of La Quinta City of La Quinta
BJ/ORDDRFT.005 1
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u5( EXHIBIT A
FENCING REGULATIONS
9.42.070 F. Fencing
1. General Requirements: Rear and side yards shall be
completely enclosed and screened by view-obscuring
fencing, walls, vegetation, planted screens, or
combinations.
2. Height/Location: Fencing for rear and side yards shall
be a minimum of 5-feet and a maximum of 6-feet in
height. The fence may be located on the property line.
Fencing in the front and street side yards shall be a
minimum of four feet and a maximum of five feet in height.
Note: height of swimming pool fencing in front yards is
controlled by State Code and is exempt from the above
regulations. Corner setback regulations, per Chapter
9.204 must be complied with. Perimeter fencing around
tracts may be 6-feet in height and constructed on
property line.)
3. Construction Material/Standards: All fencing shall
conform with the following:
a. Wood Fencing: All wood fencing shall be
constructed of #1 Cedar or Redwood boards, stained
or painted to match or complement the adjacent wall
or structure. The wood may as an alternative be
water treated and left in the natural color. The
fence boards may be erected horizontal or
vertical. Support posts shall be a minimum of 4YY Z
Z Cedar or Redwood placed 6-feet on center and
imbedded in concrete. Wooden fencing is permitted
in the rear or interior sideyard only when not
visible from public view or street.
* Exception: Split rail Cedar or Redwood fencing
is permitted within the front & street sideyard.
b. Ornamental Iron Tubular Steel: Ornamental
iron/tubular steel fencing may be used along the
front or street side yards only. The iron/steel
must be painted to compliment the adjacent wall or
structure.
BJ/DOCJH.031 1
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u6( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u7( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u8( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u9( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u:( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u;( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u<( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u=( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u>( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u?( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u@( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uA( LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL
LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
SPECIAL MEETING
APRIL 25, 1990
At 5:00 P.M., Mayor/Chairman Pena called the Special meeting of
the La Quinta City Council/La Quinta Redevelopment Agency to
order.
CITY COUNCIL ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Council Members Bohnenberger, Rushworth, Sniff, Mayor
Pena
ABSENT: Council Member Bosworth
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Mr. Bohnenberger, Mr. Rushworth, Mr. Sniff, Chairman
Pena
ABSENT: Mrs. Bosworth,
CITY COUNCIL MEETING
1. APPROVAL OF PERSONNEL ADDITIONS/CHANGES FOR 1989/90 FISCAL
YEAR.
Mr. Kiedrowski advised that there are three recommended
changes; name change from Community Services Specialist to
Senior Center Coordinator; addition of a Department Secretary
in the City ManageZY5 Office and the addition of an
Engineering Aid in the Engineering Department. He
recommended that $4,600 be transferred from the Contingency
Account to 01-4120-101-000 and $4,600 from the Contingency
Account to 01-4311-101-000.
MOTION It was moved by Council Members Snif f/Bohnenberger
that the recommendation of the City Manager be approved.
Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 90-46.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
1. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LA
QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF TAX
ALLOCATION REFUNDING BONDS OF THE AGENCY IN A PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED TWENTY MILLION DOLLARS $20,000,000) TO
REFUND CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS OF THE AGENCY AND APPROVING AN
ESCROW AGREEMENT.
Mr. Fieldman, Fieldman and Rolapp, Bond Consultant, advised
that this is a result of two years of trying to structure
some financing to save the Agency money. While the
resolution calls for a not to exceed $20,000,000, the actual
issue is $19,695,000. The result is a gross savings on the
transaction of over $1,100,000. In percentages, this 5
EQ
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uB(City Councill 2 April 25, 1990
ZRedevelopment Agency
represents a savings of about 5.75%. The Agency will have an
additional $140,000- $145,000 per year for allocation and it
slightly increases the bonding capacity. The effective rate is
7.679%.
Frank Soriano, Painewebber, expressed appreciation to
everyone involved in putting together this issue.
RESOLUTION NO. RA 90-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LA QUINTA
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF TAX
ALLOCATION REFUNDING BONDS OF THE AGENCY IN A PRINCIPAL
AMOUNT OF NINETEEN MILLION SIX HUNDRED AND NINETY-FIVE
THOUSAND $19,695,000) TO REFUND CERTAIN OBLIGATIONS OF THE
AGENCY AND APPROVING AN ESCROW AGREEMENT.
It was moved by Mr. Sniff, seconded by Mr. Rushworth that
Resolution No. 90-4 be adopted. Motion carried by the
following vote:
AYES: Mr. Bohnenberger, Mr. Rushworth, Mr. Sniff,
Chairman Pena
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: Mrs. Bosworth
Mr. Kiedrowski advised the Council that the public hearing for
Phase III of the Cove Improvement Project is scheduled for May
29th at the Community Center. However, that center was not
available for the public information meeting and asked if the
Council wishes to hold such a meeting for this phase.
Council concurred on holding two information meeting in the
Council Chambers.
There being no further business, the Council/Board adjourned.
Re Zctfully submitted,
AUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uC( LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
APRIL 17, 1990
Regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to
order at tIe ZZ`:L Zf 7:00 P.M. by Mayor Pena, followed by the
Pledge of Allegiance.
PRESENT: Council Members Bohnenberger, Bosworth, Rushworth,
Sniff, Mayor Pena
ABSENT: None
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
The following changes were made to the agenda:
1. Removed 9d from the Agenda.
2. Changed Consent Item 3 to Business Session No. 10.
3. Changed Consent Item 12 to Business Session No. 11.
4. Consider Business Session No. 1 prior to Public Hearings.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
BUSINESZ S"ZSZION
1. CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ON
HILLSIDE CONSERVATION ZONE AS RECOMMENDED BY ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSERVATION COMMITTEE.
Mr. Herman advised that on March 13th, the Planning
Commission reviewed the recommendation of the Environmental
Conservation Committee and on a 2-1-2 vote, chose not to
make a recommendation to the Council.
FRED WOLFF, Chairman of the Environmental Conservation
Committee, expressed concern about the Planning Commission's
view of the environment, which appears to be opposite of
where the Council is. He suggested that in the future,
when applicants for Planning Commission are being
interviewed that they be questioned as to their view of the
environment to assure compatibility with the Council and the
residents. He believed that there is no way to preserve our
wilderness areas other than the method recommended by the
Committee. They asked the following of the Council:
1. To make it a goal to turn the privately owned land in
the hillsides to publicly owned land;
2. For one year, as an initial implementation period, do
not approve any development in that area; and
3. During that year, make every effort to turn the
privately owned land into publicly owned land at no loss to
the owner.
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uD(City Council Minutes Page 2 April 17, 1990
He believed that their proposal is legally defensible and
suggested that the alternative to an action this evening is
for the members of the C'ZiirZitZee tZ Z to the people.
JEFF SMITH, a 15 year resident of the City supported the
recommendations of the Committee.
ALLEN LEVINE, 42-600 Cook, Palm Desert, Vice President of
Sunrise, supported the preservation of the hillsides in its
natural state and applauded the Council for considering land
exchanges as proposed; however, they would be opposed to a
funding mechanism if it's done through developers fee or
through a single funding source other than through a sales
tax revenue.
Mayor Pena applauded the Committee's efforts and noted that
the Council has expressed its' feelings that they are
categorically opposed to development in the hillsides.
MOTION It was moved by Mayor Pena, seconded by Council
Member Bohnenberger, as follows:
1. That, in order to protect in perpetuity, the open spac
areas Qf La Quinta it shall be the stated long-range goal of
the City Council to work with private property owners to
prepare an implementation plan to enable and facilitate the
transfer to public ownership without interference with the
owners property value of all currently held private parcels
in the area designated as 1'Open Space" in the General Plan.
2. That, to achieve this goal, this City Council commit
itself to a one year implementation period, during which no
development projects will be approved in the designated area.
3. Within 90 days, the City will have outlined a program to
implement the goal, and within six months the City Council
shall review the program.
4. That, at the end of one year, the City Council assess
the success of this program and provide the appropriate
adjustments or changes to continue the implementation of the
goal.
In response to Council Member Sniff, Ms. Brady, City
Attorney, advised that her office has previously presented
advise to the Council through a confidential memorandum. In
that memo, some of the legal risks associated with some of
these actions were outlined. The Council is within their
right to declare such a policy and implement it.
is
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uE(City Council Minutes Page 3 April 17, 1990
Discussion on the motion continued with Ms. Brady advising
that her office will look at the motion and determine if
there are any other actions necessary relatinZ tZ a
moratorium.
Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 90-34.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON SPECIFIC PLAN 89-014 FOR A COMMERCIAL
SHOPPING CENTER WITH APPROXIMATELY 618,000 SQ. FT. OF FLOOR
AREA ON 60 + ACRES AND ACCEPTANCE OF PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT OF ACTION FOR PLOT PLAN 90-434 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION
OF PHASE I & III OF THE PROJECT FIVE MAJOR STORES AND
RETAIL SHOPS) IN THE C-P-S ZONE AND CONFIRMATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. PROPERTY IS BOUNDED BY
WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL; HIGHWAY 111; ADAMS AND WASHINGTON
STREET. APPLICANT: TRANSPACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CO.
Mr. Herman advised that this is a continued public hearing.
At the last meeting the Council wished to have some of the
conditions clarified. He proceeded to reviewed these
conditions as outlined in Ze Ztaff repcZZ. Zr! additional
condition is being proposed stating that if any existing
drive-thru facilities are banned by the SQMD, the developer
will be required to remove the facilities and landscape and
irrigate those areas to the satisfaction of the City within
6 months of the ban. Regarding Condition No. 44 relating to
a fire mitigation fee, he noted that the Council may wish to
eliminate that condition.
In response to Council Member Bohnenberger, Mr. Herman
advised that the letter from Coachella Valley Water District
dated January 5, 1990 will be included in Condition No. 68.
PETER ADAMS, President of Transpacific Development Co.,
asked that Condition 44 be deleted. He questioned the
timing on the dedication of land referred to in Condition
68. Regarding Condition 54 Washington Street access), he
advised that they have agreed to move the access further
from the Highway ill intersection at the northern boundary
of the proZect. This will allow for that to become a
four-way intersection in the future. Both City and
developer's Engineers have determined that there will be
adequate stacking noting that there is sufficient room for
three lanes on the bridge.
Regarding the Wal-Mart elevations, he advised that what they
have is what was approved by the Planning Commission, they
have not officially been approved by Wal-Mart, which they
are 98% certain of their participation in this project.
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uF( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uG( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uH( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uI( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uJ( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uK( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uL( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uM( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uN( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uO( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uP( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uQ( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uR(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
Temporary Street Closure BUSINESS SESSION:
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
The Chamber of Commerce has requested the temporary closure
of Calle Estado for a Chamber Mixer to be held on
May 23, 1990, from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution.
Submitted by: Approved for submission
COMMUNITY SAFETY DEPT. to City Council:
ROGER T. HIRDLER RON KIEDROWSKI
COMMUNITY SAFETY DIRECTOR CITY MANAGER
FORM. 3
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uS( RESOLUTION NO. 90-
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE TEMPORARY
CLOSURE OF CALLE ESTADO, BETWEEN AVENIDA BERMUDAS
AND DESERT CLUB DRIVE
DURING A SPECIAL EVENT TO BE HELD
MAY 23, 1990
INCLUSIVE
BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta
that upon authorization by the City Engineer, the following
temporary street closure be established from 5:00 p.m to
9:00 p.m., and to be in effect during the period of the special
event. The date of this event is May 23, 1990, inclusive:
1. Calle Estado, between Avenida Bermudas arid
Desert Club Drive
APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 15th day of May, 1990.
JOHN j. PENA, MAYOR
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Dawn Honeywell, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
RESOLOl
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uT( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uU( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uV( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uW( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uX( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uY( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uZ( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u[(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider 4-way Stop at Eisenhower Drive BUSINESS SESSION:
and Calle Colima Minipark)
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
See attached Memorandum
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY:
Labor only
RECOMMENDATION:
Amend Resolution 85-42
Submitte by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
/Z /JwZ
RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORM#002
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u\( C
MEMORANDUM
*CZAIcF Z
TO: Ronald L. Kiedrowski, City Manager
FROM: Frank Reynolds, Director of Public Works
City Engineer
DATE: April 30, 1990
SUBJECT: Stop Signs on Eisenhower Drive at Calle Colima
Now that the Minipark at the intersection of Eisenhower Drive and
Calle Colima has been completed, some concern has been expressed that
a 4-way stop should be created at this intersection.
As you are aware, the existing stop signs in the Cove were
established through several Council resolutions. Specifically, the
existing stop signs on Eisenhower Drive were mandated by Council
Resolution B5-42, which directed Z Z to install 4-way stops at
Avenue 50, Calle Tampico, Calle Durango and Calle Chihuahua.
Subsequent to that action, the intersection of Eisenhower Drive and
Avenue 50 was signalized. Calle Chihuahua is only two blocks north
of Calle Colima. In my opinion the traffic pattern would not be
adversely affected if the 4-way stop at Chihuahua were eliminated and
replaced by a 4-way stop at Calle Colima. At the time the above
resolution was passed, the only Cove 4-way stop was at Calle Durango,
and the reasoning was that there were potential hazards associated
with the single, isolated 4-way stop. Therefore, the selection of
Calle Chihuahua was somewhat arbitrary to begin with.
Therefore, it is recommended that Resolution 85-42 be amended to
eliminate the reference to Avenue 50 and substitute Calle Colima for
Calle Chihuahua.
C7
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u]( RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO.
85-42 TO REMOVE THE FOUR WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF
CALLE CHIHUAHUA AND EISENHOWER DRIVE AND REPLACE IT WITH A
FOUR WAY STOP AT THE INTERSECTION OF CALLE COLIMA AND
EISENHOWER DRIVE.
WHEREAS, Section 12.16.070 authorizes the City Council, by
Resolution, to direct the installation and maintenance of official
traffic control devices at intersections where traffic conditions are
such as to require the flow of traffic be alternately interrupted and
released in order to prevent or relieve traffic congestion or to
protect life or property from exceptional hazard; and
WHEREAS, City Council Resolution No. 85-42 directed the City
Traffic Engineer to install and maintain stop signs facilitating a
four-way stop at the intersection of Calle Chihuahua with Eisenhower
Drive; and
WHEREAS, the creation of a mini park at the intersection of Calle
Colima and Eisenhower Drive requires that special safety
considerations be given that intersection, thereby deemphasis the
need for the four-way stop at Calle Chihuahua and Eisenhower Drive.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Engineer is
directed to remove the stop signs on Eisenhower Drive at Calle
Chihuahua and to install and maintain Stop signs facilitating a
four-way stop at the intersection of Calle Colima with Eisenhower
Drive, and in conjunction therewith to install necessary signs and
roadway markings.
APPROVED and ADOPTED this day of 1990
MAYOR
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK
APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO CONTENT:
CITY ATTORNEY CITY MANAGER
2;
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u^( 4'47$(i4&
COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
Tract No. 24208 BUSINZZZZ SESSION:
Williams Company, North of Miles and
East of Dune Palms) CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Tract Map submitted for final approval and acceptance of easements
and right of way.
Subdivision Improvement Agreement submitted for approval and
authorization for City Manager to execute.
Map, Agreement and Improvement Plans are in substantial compliance
with the tentative map and the Conditions of Approval.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY:
None
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Final Tract Map and Subdivision Improvement Agreement
Submitted bZ Approved for submission to
City Council:
/4 /(ZLZZ(
Zgnature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORM#002
Z
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u_(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
BUSINZS5 SESSION:
Parcel Map 25187 7
ThornburgZNortheZZZ of SagebrusZ
and Northwest of Evacuation Channel) CONSENT ZALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Parcel Map submitted for final approval and acceptance.
Parcel Map, is in substantial compliance with the tentative map
and the Conditions of Approval.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY:
None
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Final ParcZl Map.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
/<Z Z
ZRONZKIEDROwSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORM#002
7
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u`(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MAY 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
ACCEPTANCE OF REPORT OF PLANNING BUSINESS SESSION:
COMMISSION ACTION ON PLOT PLAN 89-417,
AMENDMENT #1. AMENDMENT TO A PLOT PLAN CONSENT CALENDAR:
TO CONSTRUCT A COMMERCIAL COMPLEX
RESTAURANT AND OFFICE) ON THE NORTH
SIDE OF HIGHWAY 111, 1200 FEET WEST OF
WASHINGTON STREET.
APPLICANT: T S RESTAURANTS
BACKGROUND:
The Planning Commission approved an Amendment to this project at
their meeting of May 8, 1990. The change affects architectural
style and site plan layout.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
By minute motion, accept for file this report of action taken by
the Planning Commission.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
J(MN IEZ;;;I, CITY MANAGER
BJ/CC#5/15 F2 CjZ
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_ua(
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: MAY 15, 1990
SUBJECT: REPORT OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION ON PLOT
PLAN 89-417, AMENDMENT Z1
APPLICANT: T S RESTAURANTS
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATIONS: A NEGATIVE DECLARATION WAS APPROVED IN
CONJUNCTION WITH THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL ON
SEPTEMBER 6, 1989. THIS AMENDMENT WILL NOT
CREATE ANY NEW OR ADDITIONAL IMPACTS AND
THEREFORE NO FURTHER DOCUMENTATION IS DEEMED
NECESSARY.
BACKGROUND:
The Applicants have requested approval to amend their approved
plot plan. The major changes are a change of the architectural
style from a Southwestern" design utilizing tan stucco walls
and flat tile roof to a Early California Hacienda" style
utilizing white walls for the restaurant and tan or beige for
the office building. The roof tile is proposed to be a washed
out" orange/tan barrel tile. The Applicant is trying to
recreate the La Quinta Hotel look.
While the restaurant is still two stories high, the drop off
area covered by the second story has been shortened and a small
parking area added between the two structures. The attached
Planning Commission Staff reports provides a thorough
description of the proposed amendment.
This case was originally approved by the City Council at their
meeting of September 6, 1989. Normally, Council's action would
be to accept a report of the Planning Commission action, but in
this case the City Council reviewed the case because of
concerns with traffic access and the streams and waterfalls on
Point Happy.
BJ/MEMOSS.030 1
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_ub(These concerns were resolved when full turning access was
permitted only if Caltrans grants approval and the plans were
revised so that the waterfall and streams height on Point Happy
not exceed approximately 143 feet. These items are not being
modified by this requested amendment.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION:
The Planning Commission reviewed the revised plan at the
meeting of May 8, 1990. The Planning Commission felt the
revised plan was acceptable and on a 4-0-1 Walling abstaining)
approved the request. There was one change to Condition #21
which was due to a typographical error.
RECOMMENDATION:
By minute motion, accept the report of action taken by the
Planning Commission approving amendment #1 to Plot Plan 89-417.
Attachments:
1. Conditions of Approval
2. Planning Commission Staff report dated May 8, 1990
3. Plans and exhibits
U
BJ/MEMOSS.030 2
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uc(CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL APPROVED
PLOT PLAN NO. 89-417, AMENDMENT ii
MAY 8, 1990
PLAZING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMEZZ
1. The development of the site shall generally be in
conformance with the Exhibits contained in the file for
Plot Plan Z89-417, Amendment #1 unless otherwise amended
by the following conditions.
2. The approved Plot Plan shall be used within two 2) years
of the approval date; otherwise, it shall become null and
void and of no effect whatsoever. Be used" means the
beginning of substantial construction which is
contemplated by this approval, not including grading,
which is begun within the one-year period and is
thereafter diligently pursued to completion.
Outside lighting shall be shielded and directed so as not
to shine directly upon surrounding adjoining property or
public rights-of-way. Lighting plans including light
pole heights shall be reviewed and approved by the
Planning Director. Lighting to be in conformance with
the City Ordinance requirements.
4. Issues pertaining to liability, damages, construction,
etc., due to waterfall/ponds on Rock" parcel to the
east, shall be resolved by written agreement approved by
the City Attorney prior to issuance of any permits for
this project. Goal of this Condition is to either have
waterfall/pond and other restaurant improvements on
Rock" parcel with 1Hold Harmless" agreements or modify
property line between subject property and Rock" parcel
so that waterfall/pond and other restaurant improvements
are not on Rock" parcel.
5. Parcel Map *22596 shall be recorded prior to issuance of
any permits for this development.
6. A Hold Harmless" agreement in favor of the City shall be
recorded to release City and/or property owner of
easterly parcel from liability caused by damages and/or
injuries, etc., from landslides, falling rock, etc.
Agreement shall be approved by City Attorney prior to
issuance of any permits for this development.
7. Building heights shall be clarified prior to issuance of
building permit to verify compliance with applicable
zoning requirements.
8. Minimum 25% of parking spaces shall be provided during
valet hours as self-parking areas as required by Code.
BJ/CONAPRVL. 004 1- C;;
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_ud( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_ue( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uf( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_ug( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uh( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_ui( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uj( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uk( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_ul( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_um( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_un( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uo( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_up( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uq( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_ur( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_us( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_ut( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uu( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uv( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uw( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_ux( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uy( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_uz( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MAY 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
IN-LIEU PARK FEE PROPOSAL FOR TENTATIVE BUSINESS SESSION:
TRACT NO. 24950
CONSENT CALENDAR:
APPLICANT: CHONG LEE/LEELAND DEVELOPMENT
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Chong Lee requests approval of the in-lieu park fee proposal for
Tentative Tract No. 24950. This proposed subdivision is located at
the northeast corner of Miles AvenuZ and Dune Palms Road.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The City will obtain $16,500 for parking and facilities.
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
By minute motion move to accept the recommendation of the Planning
Commission to accept the above in-lieu park fee proposal.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
j;\4 /Ly
RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
BJ/CC45/15 F1
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( z
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: MAY 15, 1990
SUBJECT: IN-LIEU PARK FEE PROPOSAL FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 24950
BACKGROUND:
On April 24, 1990, the Planning Commission recommended to the
City Council approval of the park proposal for Tentative Tract
24950 as outlined in the attached Staff Report. The Planning
Commission recommended to City Council that fee in-lieu in the
amount of $16,500 be accepted rather than parkland for
Tentative Tract 24950.
COUNCIL ACTION:
By minute motion move to accept the recommendation of the
Planning Commission to accept the park fee proposal submitted
for Tentative Tract 24950.
Attachment: Planning Commission Staff Report
CS/MEMOCC. 515 y;
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( BZ-2
STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING
DATE: APRIL 24, 1990
PROJECT: TENTATIVE TRACT 24950 DESERT FLOWER
PROJECT
DESCRIPTION: PARKLAND FEE-IN-LIEU PROPOSAL
PROJECT
LOCATION: NORTH CORNER OF MILES AVENUE AND DUNE PALMS
ROAD
APPLICANT: CHONG LEE
BACKGROUND:
Tentative Tract 24950 received approval from the Planning
Commission on September 12, 1989, and City Council on October
3, 1989.
Condition *8 required the Applicant to submit a proposal for
parking, fee-in-lieu or a combination thereof to be considered
by the Planning Commission and City Council. The Applicant has
proposed a fee-in-lieu payment based on 36-lots thus resulting
in a total fee-in-lieu of $16,000 see Attachments *1 & *2).
ANALYSIS:
1. Park Fee-In-Lieu of Parkiand.
A parkland evaluation was done for this area and it was found
that this property did not appear to provide a suitable
location for parkland. The property north of this tract was
identified as providing the best location for parkland.
In addition, the La Quinta subdivision Ordinance states that
for residential subdivisions containing 50 lots or less, the
subdivider shall pay a fee only for park and recreation
purposes.
2. Retention basin lots to be included in park fee
calculations.
The Applicant has proposed a park fee based on 36 lots which,
utilizing the park formula and a 3.01 average household size,
works out to be 0.32 acres of parkland.
BJ/STAFFRPT.054 1
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF COMPUTER BUSINESS SESSION:
EQUIPMENT
CONSENT CALENDAR: /0
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Please see attached memorandum.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Transfer of $25,000 from the contingency fund for requested purchase
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Authorize the purchase of the referenced equipment.
2) Authorize the transfer of $25,000 from the Contingency account
01-4400-100-000 to account number 01-4190-143-011 for the
purchase of the equipment.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
Signature DROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
4<7
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( C
MEMORANDUM
CZOF Z
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City
Council
FROM: Thomas p. Genovese, Assistant City ManagerZZ
DATE: May 9, 1990
SUBJECT: APPROVAL OF PURCHASE OF COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
The City Staff has recently completed an analysis of
personal computer needs for the various departments of the
City. Based on the analysis, the City staff desires to
order eight additional personal computers and two laser
printers. These additional personal computers and laser
printers are intended for the following departments:
Public works/Engineering One PC and one laser printer.
Administrative Services One PC for the Senior Center.
Planning Department Two PC's and one laser Printer.
City Manager's Office Three PC's.
Finance Department One PC.
Community Safety To receive a Terminal from the Finance
Department.
The purchase of the above referenced equipment is not
expected to exceed $25,000 and is consistent with the
City's intent to increase the utilization of more efficient
software programs such as symphony and word perfect.
Recommendation:
1) Authorize the purchase of the referenced equipment.
2) Authorize the transfer of $25,000 from the Contingency
account 0l-4400-l00Z000 to account number
01-4190-143-011 for the purchase of the equipment.
I/c/i
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MAY 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE:HEARING: PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL ADVERTISING BUSINESS SESSION:_____
DEVICES 90-004 TO ALLOW FLAGS
AND DIRECTIONAL SIGNS FOR CACTUS FLOWER CONSENT CALENDAR:
PROJECT TT 22982)
STUDY SESSION:
APPLICANT: WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT
CORPORATION
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to Municipal Code requirements, the Applicant is requesting
approval of flags and directional signs to be displayed in front of
their subdivision on the southeast corner of Fred Waring Drive and
Dune Palms Road.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider the request of the Applicant and take action by Minute
Motion.
SubmitteZ by: Approved for submission
to City Council City Council:
Z/ /Z4
RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
CS/CC45/l5 Fl
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( 0
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: MAY 15, 1990
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICE 90-004
FOR CACTUS FLOWER TT 22982)
LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND
DUNE PALMS ROAD
APPLICANT: WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BACKGROUND:
During March 1990 it was noted by staff that the Applicant had
erected a number of flags and 5 directional signs along Fred
Waring Drive and Dune Palms Road without the required
permission.
On April 2, 1990, staff informed the Applicant that they were
in violation of City Code and advised them to obtain the
necessary permits. Attachment #1).
The Applicant has now requested permission for Special
Advertising Device for the flags and directional signs from the
City Council.
Municipal Code Chapter 5.64, Special Advertising
Devices" provides for a permit to be issued by the City
Council for advertising devices other than the normal and
customary permanent business identification sign, and
includes such items as flags and directional signs.
REQUEST:
1. FLAGS
The Applicant requests permission to display 36 flags
located on Fred Waring Drive at the temporary entrance to
the Cactus Flower project. These flags are approximately
2-feet by 4-feet in size with alternate horizontal
stripes of pink, turquoise, and purple.
CS/MEMOGL. 006 1-
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(2. DIRECTIONAL SIGNS
The Applicant also requests permission for 6 model home
complex identification signs ranging from 2-feet x 3-feet
4-feet high) to 5-feet x 8-feet 10-feet high) as
measured by staff.
The applicant requests permission for the identification signs
and flags for a period of one year.
The reason for these requests is to direct traffic into the
project from Fred Waring Drive a major arterial) via Dune
Palms Road, which is presently a low use road.
ANALYSIS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
1. FLAGS
All similar recently approved Special Advertising Device
requests involve a maximum of 21 flags. Staff feels that
the request for 36 flags is excessive and recommends
approval of only 21 flags. Approval should be granted
for one year, commencing with April 1, 1990 due to the
fact that these flags have already been erected and
utilized since that date.
2. DIRECTIONAL
The La Quinta Sign Regulations state that a model home
identification sign is allowed at the major access street
to a project. This sign must have a maximum of 50 square
feet of sign area and have a maximum height of 5 feet.
The largest sign requested does not exceed the square
footage of sign area but is 10 feet high as opposed to 5
feet high as permitted by the City Code. However, staff
feZls that this sign does not, in particular, constitute
a traffic hazard or nuisance to the adjacent surrounding
properties or to the public at large. Staff therefore
recommends that approval be granted for this sign.
The Applicant is requesting 5 other directional signs for
this project. Staff recommends that only two signs in
addition to the large sign be approved. One of these
additional signs should be located on the corner of Fred
Waring Drive and Dune Palms Road and the other on Fred
Waring Drive as a pre warning for motorists wanting to
turn left onto Dune Palms Road.
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS/ACTION:
Section 5.64.020 provides, in part, that permits are to be
issued for special purposes, and not on a continuing basis
for permanent advertising or identification purposes,!1 and
further, that, Z`Each permit shall be issued for a specified
period of time subject to renewal for good cause shown.!?
CS/MEMOGL. 006 2-
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MAY 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL ADVERTISING BUSINESS SESSION:
DEVICES 90-005 TO ALLOW FLAG'S FOR
RANCHO OCOTILLO PROJECT TT 24517). CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
APPLICANT: WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to Municipal Code requirements, the Applicant is requesting
approval of flags to be displayed in front of their subdivision on
the southeast corner of Fred Waring Drive and Adams Street.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider the request of the Applicant and take action by Minute
Motion.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
BJ/CC45/15.F3
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: MAY 15, 1990
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICES 90-005
FOR RANCHO OCOTILLO TT 24517)
LOCATION: SOUTHEAST CORNER OF FRED WARING DRIVE AND ADAMS ST.
APPLICANT: WILLIAMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
BACKGROUND:
During March 1990, it was noted by staff that the Applicant had
erected flags at the Rancho Ocotillo project without the
required permission.
On April 2, 1990, staff informed the Applicant that they were
in violation of City Code and advised them to obtain the
necessary permits for the existing flags see attachment 1).
The Applicant has now requested permission for a Special
Advertising Device from the City Council.
Municipal Code Chapter 5.64, ZSpecial Advertising
Devices" provides for a permit to be issued by the City
Council for advertising devices other than the normal and
customary permanent business identification signs, and
includes such items as flags.
REQUEST: Attachment 2 & 3)
The Applicant requests permission for 20 flags located at
Rancho Ocotillo TT 25417) around the temporary access point
off Fred Waring Drive. The flags are approximately 2-feet x
4-feet in size with alternate horizontal stripes of pink and
turquoise. The Applicant has requested permission for the
flags for a period of one year.
CS/MEMOGL. 005 1- yiZQ\
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(ANALYSIS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Similar requests have been granted recently for other new
subdivisions. The proposed location and number of flags are
acceptable.
Therefore the Applicant should be permitted to have flags at
the above mentioned location. Approval should be granted for
one year, commencing with April 1, 1990 due to the fact that
these flags have already been erected and utilized since that
date.
CITY COUNCIL FINDINGS/ACTION:
Section 5.64.020 provides, in part, that permits are to be
issued for special purposes, and not on a continuing basis
for permanent advertising or identification purposes," and
further, that, Each permit shall be issued for a specified
period of time subject to renewal for good cause shown."
In taking action on a permit, the Council must find that the
Special Advertising Device applied for would not:
o constitute a traffic hazard or nuisance to adjacent or
surrounding properties or to the public at large; or,
o be detrimental to the public convenience or welfare; or,
o be inconsistent with the various elements and objectives
of the General Plan and all other officially adopted
policies and regulations of the City.
Conditions may be assigned to any permit granted in order to
harmonize it with the public purposes expressed in this Chapter
of the Municipal Code.
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider the request of the Applicant and take action by Minute
Motion to approve Special Advertising Device application 90-005
for a period of one year commercing April 1, 1990.
Attachments:
1. Letter identifying sign violations from the Planning and
Development Department
2. Letter from Applicant requesting permission for flags
3. Plan showing location of flags
CS/MEMoGL.005 2-
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MAY 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL ADVERTISING BUSINESS SESSION:
DEVICES 90-006 FOR TENTATIVE TRACT 25389
CONSENT CALENDAR:
APPLICANT: BROCK HOMES
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Pursuant to Municipal Code requirements, the Applicant is requesting
approval of flags to be displayed in front of their subdivision on
50th Avenue. Tentative Tract 25389 is located east of Washinqton
Street between 50th Avenue and Calle Tampico extension and Calle
Rondo and Park Avenue.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
APPROVED BY:
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider the request of the Applicant and take action by minute
motion.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
natur RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
BJ/CC#5/15 F5
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( 0
MEMORANDUM
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY
COUNCIL
FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
DATE: MAY 15, 1990
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICES
90-006
LOCATION: EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET BETWEEN 30TH AVENUE
AND CALLE TAMPICO EXTENSION AND CALLE RONDO
AND PARK AVENUE.
APPLICANT: BROCK HOMES
REPRESENTATIVE: OUTDOOR DIMENSIONS
BACKGROUND:
Outdoor Dimensions has on behalf of Brock Homes requested
permission to erect eight flags in front of the temporary sales
trailer located on Tentative Tract 25389 see Attachment 1 &
2). These flags are 4-feet x 6-feet in size with white and
orange stripes. The blue Brock Homes logo is centrally
positioned on the flag.
The Applicant is requesting permission to utilize these flags
for a period of one year.
Please note, these flags have already been erected prior to
obtaining permission.
Municipal Code Chapter 5.64, 1special Advertising Devices"
provides for a permit to be issued by the City Council for
advertising devices other than the normal and customary
permanent business identification signs, and includes such
items as flags.
ANALYSIS AND STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The proposed location and number of flags are acceptable.
Similar requests have been granted recently for other new
subdivisions.
The Applicant should therefore be permitted to have the flags
at the above mentioned location for a period of one year. 9
BJ/MEMOGL.031 1
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(COUNCIL COUNCIL FINDINGS/ACTION:
Section 5.64.020 provides, in part, that permits are to be
issued for special purposes, and not on a continuing basis
for permanent advertising or identification purposes," and
further, that, Each permit shall be issued for a specified
period of time subject to renewal for good cause shown."
In taking action on a permit, the Council must find that the
Special Advertising Device applied for would not:
o Constitute a traffic hazard or nuisance to adjacent or
surrounding properties or to the public at large; or,
o Be detrimental to the public convenience or welfare; or,
o Be inconsistent with the various elements and objectives
of the General Plan and all other officially adopted
policies and regulations of the City.
Conditions may be assigned to any permit granted in order to
harmonize it with the public purposes expressed in this Chapter
of the Municipal Code.
RECOMMENDATION:
Consider the request of the Applicant and take action by minute
motion to approve Special Advertising Device application 90-006
for a period of one year.
Attachments:
1. Letter from Applicant requesting Special Advertising
Device
2. Location of proposed flags
2
BJ/MEMOGL.031 2
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider Approval of Plans and
Specifications and Call for Bids for BUSINESS SESSION:
Installation of Median Island
Landscaping on Jefferson Street from CONSENT CALENDAR: /
Highway 111 to Westward Ho Drive STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
The City Council approved the general concept of the landscaping
on Jefferson Street in this section; therefore it would be
appropriate to proceed with the call for bids for construction.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY:
Estimate $88,000. Funds are proposed to be provided in 1990-1991
budget.
RECOMMEND ZATI ON:
Approve plans and specifications and call for bids.
Approved for submission to
City Council:
/<1 /LZ)
RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORM#002
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(COUNCIL MEETING DATE: May 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Consider Approval of Plans and
Specifications and Call for Bids for BUSINESS SESSION:
Washington Street Widening CONSENT CALENDAR:
from Highway 111 to south of
Highland Palms STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
This project is to be coordinated with the Lake La Quinta Spanos)
project to widen and improve Washington Street to provide a
minimum four lane facility. This is the last portion of
Washington Street to receive interim 4-lane) widening between
Avenue 50 and Highway ill. It is expected that the full widening
ultimate) will result in the future with other private
developments.
The project is scheduled to meet Z ZrZZLZve Z c'f t:Ze City's
Order of Immediate Possession for the last remaining parcel of
right of way required.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY:
Estimate $801,000: Funds are proposed to be provided in 1990-1991
budget.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve plans and specifications and call for bids.
Submitte y: Approved for submission to
City Council:
RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORMZ002 4</i
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY # Z
MEETING DATE: May 14, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
TRANSMITTAL OF PROPOSED ANNUAL BUSINESS SESSION:
BUDGET FISCAL YEAR 1990/91
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION:
BACKGROUND:
Please see attached memorandum.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS; APPROVED BY:
None
RECOMMENDATION:
Review Budget Document and forward commentZ for inclusion into
June 4 draft.
Submitted by: Approved for submission to
City Council:
Signature RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
FORMZ002
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( COUNCIL MEETING DATE: MAY 15, 1990 AGENDA CATEGORY:
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING:
CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF AN BUSINESS SESSION:
ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ORDINANCE
CONSENT CALENDAR:
STUDY SESSION;
BACKGROUND:
On April 16, during the Council Study Sesssion, the Council discussed
a proposed Art in Public Places ordinance which is being proposed by
the Community Services Commission. At that time, several concerns
were expressed by both the Council and Commission Members. The attached
ordinance as revised) intends to address those concerns. The changes
made are outlined in the attached memorandum.
In addition to adoption of the ordinance, the Community Services Commission
recommends that the Council set aside $250,000 in a trust fund from
which the interest derived would be used for this Drogram.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY:
$250,000 from the General Fund to be placed in a trust fund.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. That the Council introduce the proposed Art in Public Places ordinance
on first reading; and
2. Authorize a trust fund to be set up in the amount of $250,000.
Approved for submission to
City Council:
Z by:
ure RON KIEDROWSKI, CITY MANAGER
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(I C
MEMORANDUM
DATE: MAY 15, 1990
TO: CITY MANAGER AND CITY COUNCIL
FROM: JERRY HERMAN AND SAUNDRA JUHOLA
For the Community Services Commission)
SUBJECT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES ORDINANCE
On April 16, 1990, the City Council reviewed the proposed Art in
Public Places ordinance as proposed by the Community Services
Commission and re-written by the City Attorney.
Several concerns were expressed at that time, which have been
addressed in the revised attached ordinance. Following are some
of the changes made:
1. Page 5, Section 5(b) $5,000 was inserted.
2. Page 5, Section 6(2) and 2) the $225,000 was changed to
$100,000 and 5) was eliminated.
A report on what would have been collected during the 1989/90
Fiscal Year based on these amounts, had the ordinance been in
effect, will be presented to the Council during study session.
3. Page 6, Section 6(b) 3) was added to exempt public projects.
4. Page 7, Section 7(e) was modified to state that the Council
would ratify the selection made by the Committee, and
therefore, e) was eliminated.
5. Page 9, Section 9(e) was deleted to be consistent with
Section 6 in deleting public projects from the fee.
6. Page 9, Section 10 a) was re-written to state that an art
work must remain in place for a minimum of 25 years and at
the end of that period, the applicant shall either make
application to retain the art for another 10 year period or
to replace it.
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(7. Page 10, Section 11 a) was modified to reflect the
Commission's desire to place a limitation on the amount of
monies from this fund which can be spent on administration of
the program.
Also attached, is a copy of the Community Services Commission
minute of April 30, in which a motion was made indicating their
desire to see this ordinance acted upon expeditiously in order
to avoid losing any major contributions to this fund through
major commercial developments currently being planned.
7;
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDMENT TITLE 2 OF THE MUNICIPAL
CODE BY ADDING CHAPTER 2.65.
The City Council of the City of La Quinta,
California does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. There is hereby added to the La Quinta
Municipal Code Chapter 2.65 to read as set forth in Exhibit
A", attached hereto and made part of.
SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall
be in full force and effective thirty 30) days after its
adoption.
SECTION 3. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within
15 days after passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted
in at least three public places designated by resolution of the
City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this
ordinance; and, shall cause this ordinance and its
certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered
into the Book of Ordinances of this City.
The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at
a meeting of the City Council held on the day of
1990, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
JOHN PENA, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California Zjj
BJ/ORDDRFT.040 1
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( STEADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH
A PRO'ESSIONAL CORPORATION
rRITZ P. STRADLING JULIE MCCOY ACINS ATTORNEYS AT LAW JOHN E. BRECKENRIDGE
NICK K. YOCCA DAWN C. HONEYWELL
C. CRAIG CARLSON OWEN B. LUBOW 660 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 1600 ZENA C. STONE
Or COUNSEL
WILLIAM P. RAUTH III LAWRENCE B. COHN
K.C. SCHAAZ HARLEY L. BJELLAND POST OZZICE BOX 7680
RICHARD C. GOODMAN STEPHEN T. ZREEMAN NEWPORT BEACH', CALIrORNIA B2660-6441
JOHN 4. MURPHY PERRY 4. TARNOrSKY
THOMAS P CLARK, JR. ROBERT A. WILSON TELEPHONE 714) 725-4000
SEN A. rRYDNAN CHERYL A. DOW
DAVID P. MCEWEN NICHOLAS 4. YOCCA TELEPHONE 714) 640-7035 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL:
PAUL L. GALE LISA M. KITSUTA
RUDOLPH C. SHEPARD JULIE M. PORTER rAS NUMBER
ROBERT 4. CANE MAR11 T. PAUN
M.D. TALBOT JOHN 0. STEINBERG 714)725-4100
BRUCE C. STUART ROBERT C. rUNSTEN
DOUGLAS r. HIGHAM ALETA LOUISE BRYANT
E. CURT YEAGER RONALD A. VAN BLARCOM
ROBERT 4. WHALEN STEPHEN M. MCNAMAPA
ROBERT E. RICH GARY A. PEMBERTON
THOMAS A. PIBTONE 4. MICHAEL VAUGHN
SCOTT MCCONNELL CINDY P. HUGHES
RANDALL 4. SHERMAN DENISE E. HARSAUGH
BRUCE W. rEUCHTER BARBARA L. ZEID
MARK 4. HUEBSCN ERIC T. SALTZMAN
KAREN A. ELLIS MICHAEL 4. RUBINO
ELIZABETH C. GREEN ANDREW P. RIrKIN
BRUCE 0. MAY GARY P DOWNS March 23, 1990
DONALD 4. HAMMAN JOHN 0. IRELAND
JOHN 4. SWIGART, JR. MICHAEL 4. PENDERGAST
MICHAEL A. ZASLOCKI DAVID H. MANN
NEILA P. BERNSTEIN GALE I. SCHLESINGER
CELESTE STAHL BRADY DANA M. KEZMOH
CHRISTOPHER 4. KILPATRICK DARRYL S. GIBSON
JOEL H. GUTH
Jerry Herman
Planning and Development Director
City of La Quinta
78-105 Calle Estado
La Quinta, California 92253
Re: Art in Public Places Ordinance
Dear Jerry:
As we've discussed, enclosed is an initial draft of the Art
in public Places Ordinance the Ordinance"). The enclosed
draft Ordinance has been revised from the draft ordinance you
previously furnished to us in order to further incorporate the
provisions of Chapter 5 commencing with Section 66000) of
Division 1 of Title 7 of the California Government Code, the
statutory codification of ABl6OO the Law").
As you are aware, the Law sets forth certain procedures
which must be met where fees are exacted against development
projects as a condition of approval of the proposed development.
The purpose of this letter is to describe certain
requirements of the Law which are applicable to the Art in
Public Places program established by the draft Ordinance, to
discuss certain findings which you will be required to make in
connection with the enactment of the Ordinance, and to pass
along some stray thoughts about art in public places programs,
generally, and about the Program established in the draft
Ordinance, in particular.
cC
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(Jerry Herman
March 23, 1990
Page Two
The Law, in Section 66001 thereof, requires that, in any
action establishing a fee as a condition of approval of a
development project, the city taking such action must make
certain determinations establishing a reasonable relationship
a) between the use of the fee and the type of project on which
the fee is imposed, b) between the need for the public
facilities here, the artworks) financed with the fees and the
type of development project on which the fee is imposed and C)
between the amount of the fee and the cost of the public
facilities attributable to the development on which the fee is
imposed. I have incorporated these findings in Section 2 of the
draft Ordinance but you may wish to adopt them separately by
resolution.
I would very much appreciate your thoughts on how the
determinations set forth in the findings could be enhanced.
These determinations are not easy to make in the context of
the Art in Public Places Program for several reasons. ZirZt
artwork, unlike other public facilities, varies widely in terms
of cost. For this reason it is difficult to establish a
reasonable relationship between the amount of the fee and the
cost of the public facilities. Also, without knowing in advance
what artwork will be purchased and where the artwork will be
placed, only the most general determinations can be made as to
the reasonable relationship between the use of the fee and the
need for public art and the types of development projectZ on
which the fees are imposed.
I have revised the draft Ordinance to provide for the
adoption by the City of a capital improvement plan which would
indicate the approximate location, size, time of availability
and estimates of cost for the facilities to be financed with the
fees. The Law states, in Section 66001, that the identification
of the public facilities to be financed with the fees may be
made by reference to a capital improvement plan or may be made
in applicable general or specific plan requirements or in other
public documents that identify the public facilities for which
the fees are charged.
rn(
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(Jerry Herman
March 23, 1990
Page Three
There are both advantages and disadvantages to the CityZs
adoption of an Art in Public Places Plan. The chief advantage,
in my view, is that the existence of a plan for use of the fees
greatly enhances the ability of the fee program to withstand
judicial attack. As a practical matter, developers will
probably be somewhat less likely to object to the fee if the
City can show that it has a definite plan for the use of the
fees. As a legal matter, the legality of the imposition of the
fees will depend on the reasonableness of the fee relative to
the developments on which the fee is imposed and the use for the
fees. It is very difficult it to establish the reasonableness
of the fee program if a specific plan for the use of the fees
has not been developed.
On the other hand, the adoption of a capital improvement
plan is more of an administrative burden. The Law requires, in
Section 66002, that the capital improvement plan shall be
adopted by, and shall be annually updated by, a resolution of
the governing body of the local agency adopted at a noticed
public hearing, notice of the hearing to be given pursuant to
Section 65090. In addition, the Law requires that mailed notice
shall be given to any city or county which may be significantly
affected by the capital improvement plan. In addition to the
administrative burdens, because of the nature of the Art in
Public Places Program, it will be more difficult to develop a
plan which identifies with any reasonable degree Cf specificity
the location, cost and type of art which will be acquired with
the fees.
As is incorporated in Section 9(b) of the draft Ordinance,
the Law sets forth different requirements fDr the imposition of
fees and charges on residential developments than other
developments. Section 66007 states that, unless certain other
determinations are made, as herein described, a city which
imposes fees or charges on a residential development for the
construction of public improvements or facilities may not
require the payment of those fees or charges, notwithstanding
any other provision of law, until the date of the first
inspection or the date the certificate of occupancy is issued,
whichever occurs first. If the residential development contains
more than one dwelling, the local agency may determine whether
the fees or charges shall be paid on a pro rata basis for each
dwelling when it receives its final inspection or certificate of
occupancy, whichever occurs first; on a pro rata basis when a
certain percentage of the dwellings have received their final
inspection or certificate of occupancy, whichever occurs first;
C>
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( 78-105 CALLE ESTADO LA QUINTA, CALiFORNIA 92253 619) 564-2246
FAX 619) 564-5617
February 15, 1990
Ms. Celeste Stahl Brady
City Attorney
Stradling, Yoka, Carison & Roth
660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1600
Wells Fargo Building
P. 0. Box 7680
Newport Beach, CA 92660-6441
SUBJECT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES DRAFT ORDINANCE
Dear Celeste:
Attached is the Art in Public Places Committees draft
Zrdinance. We attempted to addreZZ ZZ16oCI, Znd Zther
constraints, in the orZinance. I would appreciate your review
as to form, content and especially how it may or may not comply
with AB 1600. Any suggested language changes would be greatly
appreciated before City Council consideration.
This matter has been Zentative scheduled for the Community
Service Commission on February 22nd. Your review is not
contingent upon their taking action, however I would appreciate
your review as soon as possible since the Committee would like
Council action in March.
Should you have any questions concerning the above, please
contact myself at your convenience.
Z very truly yours,
PLANN NG & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
JH:bja
cc: Maureen Mendoza
Saundra Juhola
Kay Wolfe
Joan Foster
File
BJ/LTRJH.051 1
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( ZZLcZr> C
ZzmZr- 1StZ-3- OF
Z t IF Zub1 iL Fl ZLes Fund shZ Zm ni tZr:: b\ th-:
1 ZV I Zfl Z 1 thZou.qh an Zrt IF F i F mm tTZZ
h1 Ommi ttLZE Zha1 1 bZ comZoZ-:z Z-ZDZri t thZ
nf Z ZtZtS Foundat i on on. Zembz OF Z tv.
Z vi + iZ.- arts Zommittee ano*Z rn- eZ oZ the City
tZ++.tZ The Committee Zi11 be a tZndinZ ulmlttee 0+ the
Cit\.. CounCil
TZ member.-. Zi 1 be tZo year term-. one Ff thZee ear anZ
tZC. Zor one year dLLrinZ the intia Z0rrn-:..tiCn Fol CLZinZ trZ
end 0+ th Znt1ai terms the memZer.z ZouZ d. erve tZC. vear
ZeieCti0n 0+ H'rt
Litv ZZou1d deveZoo a ist 0+ fl0==Z5.1C iCZ-ZjZF- +or the art
ry ZoLL1d seZeCt art based on loCations.
letnoo ot Ze1 eCt ion DireCt PurCFS=-.e 1 Z Z-mmissZon
Lonat ions..
ZZZCZrinri.---te Airt +or the loCation.
The artZor.k may be deCorative or +uflCtiOZa..
HoZ muCh Control shoul d we have over the devel oper in tur.Zs
0+ the tyZe 0+ art and Cost ic water+Z: 1 s vs soms.thin9 yZe
miZnt + mo more aZZrooriate.
he art h. to have Commensurante Zith amount Col eCted
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( Mrt In Public Places
City 0+ La Quinta
0.00.000 Intent and Purpose
It is the purpose 0+ the City Council 0+ La Quirita to establish
the Zrt in Public PlacesZ' Committee to promote and encourage
support +or the Zrts.
The City 0+ La Ourita has developed a nationwide reputation
through the annual La Quinta Zrts Festival and other artistic
events. The Festival attracts thousands 0+ viSitors each year
to view and purchase art and cra+ts. The pub) ic health, morale.
sa+e ty and we 1 +are, as we 1 1 as the pOpularity and posper i ty o4
the community are dependent upon and enhanced by visually
pleasing and high quality public art.
The Zrt in Public Places program is intended to provide creative
eZpression 0+ visual art throughout the City. The goal 0+ the
Cultural Pesources Element 0+ the rZeneral Plan is to provide
as enrichment 0+ the community by adequate cultural and
recreational +acil ities and activitiesZ5. To implement this
goal, the General Plan mandates the city to 5provide pub) ic
+acil ities which are designed to complement private +acil ities
arid encourage opportunities +or cultural enhancement 0+ the City
0+ La Quinta"
f;rt in Public Places Ordinance, page 1
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(The Oeneral Plan +urther states that Zthe cultural resources 0+
a Ci ty encZZasses those +ac i 1 i ties arid pro9rams which re+resh
enhance or re-create peopi e's bodies and sp in ts'Z. Community
parks, recreational activi ties, historic resourcesZ 1 ibrar>'
+aci ii ties and art +estivals are included in this classi+i-
cat ion. Zs such, the>' are a vital part 0+ a Cit>'
Residential and commercial development throughout the Cit>' will
bene+it +rom public art, both +financial and visually. The
Cit>' will prosper through planned residential and commercial
development. Zs such, the cost 0+ providing public art should
be shared. This program is a means 0+ achieving a balanced
responsible 1 it>' 0+ providing a cultural enhancement.
0.00.000 De+ini tions
a. Zrt Work Zrt WorkZ means oriqinal creation 0+ art including
but not limited to sculpture, murals, mosaics and +ountains. The
art work may be decorative or +unctional
bZ Public Place *ZPubl ic Place" means any area on public or
private property which is accessible and visible to the general
public.
c. Zrt In Public Places Committee The 4rt In Public Places
Committee" will be composed 0+ +ive members. This committee Will
be a standing committee 0+ appointed by] the City Council. This
Zrt in Public Places Ordinance, page 2
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( SThDY SESSION ITZZ NO. 3
FRED WOLFF
P.O. Box 1016
La Ouinta, Ca 92253
619) 564-4070
May 4, 1990
City Council
City 0+ La Zuinta
P.O. Zox 1506
La Quinta, Ca 92253
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
Bystrice is & small town in Czechoslovakia! right on the
Polish border. It has a population 0+ about 5,000 people.
Some 0+ them work in the nearby steel-mill, some are
farmers, merchants, teachers or craftsmen NothIng very
special about Bystrice.'
On our first trip to Czechoslovakia some years ago'. we made
friends with a couple 0+ young people, Jitka arid Jiri whom
we met in a small hotel elsewhere in Czechoslovakia. They
happen to be from Bystrice, and on our subsequent trips to
their country, weZve visited them, and have enjoyed their
and their parentsZ hospitality, and have become very
familiar with Bystrice. We correspond regularly, arid their
letters have kept us apprised 0+ how the ZVelvet Revolution"
has affected their little town.
Jiri was instrumental in quickly forming a Peoples ForumZZ,
theiZ first democratic party. Z couple others e.'rerged, and a
few weeks ago they had their first democratic election!
The PeopleZs Forum won a majority seats on the city council
and one member of their party was elected mayor: Znna
Konderlova. There is much hope for a free, democratic
future
NCWI. It occurred to me that our city 0+ La Quinta could make
a small contribution, and perhaps become a model for other
cities, in helping small communities in Eastern Europe to
become functional cities, p0551 bly md udi ng a free-market
local economy. While nat ion-to-nation programs and Zbi 9 city
to big city" activities are happening between the Western
and the Eastern world, there is nothing like: I ittle town
to i ttle town". Yet, I believe true democracy starts at
the grass-roots level. People to people!
Few Zmer i cans becorrie fami 1 ar Wi th smal 1 towns in Eastern
Europe, certainly Czechoslovakia. Here then is a unique
opportunity, because communication already exists: Kay and I
with Jitka and Jiri a unique situation.
I've hinted at the idea in a recent letter to Jiri and he
responded just a couple 0+ days ago that their new mayor is
enthusiastic about the idea, and we should get a letter from
her in the near +uture.
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(I'm respect+ully suggesting that La Duinta can make a small
contribution toward a peace+ul open and non threatening
+uture +or the global society: our children need not live in
+ear 0+ world con+l ict!
Our commitment need not be 0+ major + i nanc i al consequences;
there's much to be done at minimal expense, such as:
helping establish a system 0+ local democratic government.
persuading computer companies to donate hard & so+tware to
Bystr i ce's city and schools.
encouraging U.S. + i rms to assist with local enterprise.
There are no hotels, +ast-+ood outlets or supermarkets irE
the area!) Zlso need toilet-paper!
establ i sh exchange viSits with civic o++ cal s, teacher6,
students, etc.
set up a pen-pal program between youngsters and perhapc
adults) +rom the two communities.
display and perhaps sell handicra+t +rom Bystrice in La
Ou i nta.
The above are just a +ew items o++ the top 0+ mx head.
NaturalZy, we'd need to determine what the people 0+
Bystrice perceive as assistance we might o4+er.
Well all the above is just an idea. City government tends
to be overwhelmed with meeting the needs within our
community. Here is an opportunity to reach beyond, make
some e++orts toward urisel + i sh services to a greater society,
and perhaps start a movement which may make a major
di ++erence.
We have slides 0+ Bystrice, its appearance, environs, people
and their homes and 1 i+estyles. I'd be delighted to provide
a showing at some time convenient Zor you, and perhaps city
sta++, i+ you so desire.
Kay and I will be returning to Bystrice this Jul>'. It would
be +antastic i+ we could carry a letter 0+ intent +rom our
mayor to the mayor 0+ that little town:
La Quinta wants to be your +riend and helper.
What do you think?
Sincere 1 y,
Fred Wol++
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( ASTUDY SESSION ITZZ NO. 5
Z 0
MEMORANDUM
DATE: MAY 15, 1990
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY MANAGER
SUBJECT: SUMMER COUNCIL SCHEDULE
JULY 2 STUDY SESSION
JULY 3 REGULAR MEETING
JULY 18,19 & 20 LEAGUE'S EXECUTIVE FORUM IN MONTEREY
JULY 30 STUDY SESSION
JULY 31 REGULAR MEETING
AUG 7 & 21 DARK Except for any necessary special
meetings)
SEPT 4 Tues) STUDY SESSION
SEPT 5 Wed) REGULAR MEETING
ALTERNATE PROPOSAL: Schedule study sessions at 3:00 P.M. on
Council Meeting day instead of Mondays and handle Study Session
Items along with the Business Session and Consent Calendar and
break for dinner from 5:00 P.M. to 7:00 P.M. and reconvene to
handle public hearings.
EXAMPLE:
July 3 3:00 P.M. Study Session Agenda
Business Session Agenda
Consent Calendar
5:00 P.M. Dinner Break
7:00 P.M. Public Hearings
Council Comment
Public Comment
Adjournment
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u
( DEPARmfENTAL REPORT: c
Z 0
z
DATE: MAY 14, 1990
TO: CITY COUNCIL
FROM: CITY CLERK
SUBJECT: NOVEMBER 6TH MUNICIPAL ELECTION CALENDAR
JUNE 18 ADOPT RESOLUTION CALLING ELECTION
JULY 16/AUG 10 NOMINATION PERIOD
AUG 7 LAST DZ& Z A i'ZEAZZjRL ON THE BALLOT
AUG 15 LAST DAY OF NOMINATION PERIOD IF AN INCUMBENT
DID NOT FILE BY AUG. 10
OCT 5 FIRST PRE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN STATEMENT DUE
OCT 8 CLOSE OF REGISTRATION
OCT 25 SECOND PRE-ELECTION CAMPAIGN STATEMENT DUE
OCT 30 LAST DAY TO APPLY FOR ABSENTEE BALLOT
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( REPORTS & INFZRMATIONAL ITEZ1: a
cc
MINUTES
PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF LA QUINTA
A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall
78-105 Calle Estado, La Quinta, California
April 24, 1990 7:00 P.M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
A. The meeting was called to order at 7:00 P.M. by
Chairman walling. The Flag Salute was led by
Commissioner Zelles.
II. ROLL CALL
A. Chairman walling requested the roll call.
Present: Commissioners Zelles, Moran, Bund,
Steding and Chairman walling.
B. Staff Present: Principal Planner Stan Sawa,
Department Secretary Betty Anthony.
III. HEARINGS
A. Tentative Tract 25363 Continued; a request of
Santa Rosa Developers to subdivide 20+ acres into
83 single family lots and 5 lots for use as 2
retention basins.
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the
information contained in the Staff report, a
copy of which is on file in the Planning and
Development Department.
2. Chairman walling opened the public hearing.
No one wished to address the Commission.
Commissioner Moran moved and Commissioner
Steding seconded the motion to continue the
hearing to May 8, 1990, at the request of the
Applicant. Unanimously approved.
IV. PUBLIC COMMENT None
V. CONSENT CALENDAR
Commissioner Steding moved and Commissioner Zelles
seconded the motion to approve the minutes of April 10,
1990. Unanimously approved.
BJ/MIN/4.24/DFT 1 0
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(VI. BUSINESS SESSION
A. Calle Tampico Precise Alignment; a request of
the City for widening and reconstructing of Calle
Tampico from Washington Street to Eisenhower Drive.
1. Commissioner Bund asked to be excused due to
a possible conflict of interest.
2. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented a brief
summary and introduced City Engineer Frank
Reynolds who presented the report to the
Commission.
3. Commissioner Moran questioned whether
landscaping medians would be provided. City
Engineer Reynolds responded yes they were to
be.
4. Commissioner Steding and Zelles questioned
ownership of the land to be acquired with the
realignment and if the realignment would
prevent owners from developing their land.
City Engineer Reynolds explained that the
land would be acquired according to the fair
market value and the alignment would not
prevent owners from developing.
5. Following discussion, Commissioner Moran
moved to adopt Minute Motion 90-012 approving
the precise alignment as submitted.
Commissioner Steding seconded the motion and
it passed unanimously with Commissioner Bund
abstaining.
B. Tentative Tract 24950; a request by Chong Lee for
parkland fee-in-lieu proposal.
1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the
information contained in the Staff report, a
copy of which is on file in the Planning and
Development Department.
2. Commissioner Moran corrected the calculations
contained in the Staff report from 3.2 to 32
acres of parkland.
3. There being no further comments, Commissioner
Moran moved to adopt Minute Motion 90-013
approving the Parkland fee at $16,500.
Commissioner Zelles seconded the motion and
it passed unanimously.
BJ/MIN/4.24/DFT 2
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( REPORTS & IZQZNATIONAL ITEZl: b
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
MINUTES
APRIL 30, 1990
Regular meeting of the Community Services Commission was called
to order at the hour of 7:00 P.M. followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance.
PRESENT: Commissioners Franke, Molina, Mendoza
and Chairwoman Ladner
ABSENT: Commissioners Beck, Benedict and Kennedy
MOTION It was moved by Mrs. Mendoza, seconded by Mrs. Franke
to excuse Mr. Beck, Mrs. Benedict and Mrs. Kennedy.
ANNOUNCEMENTS None
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION None
PUBLIC COMMENT None
1. HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
Report on Disaster Preparedness by Roger Hirdler,
Community Safety Director.
Mr. Hirdler reported the City of La Quinta had
participated in a valley-wide earthquake drill on the
26th of April. The drill was a communications drill
with the County and 9 valley Cities. Mr. Hirdler said
during the drill two evacuation centers were set up;
the St. Francis Church and the Community Park. The
City does not have a designated collection point, as
the Health Department does not deem it necessary. The
Health Department does have three collection points in
the valley; the Sunrise Park, College of the Desert
and the Date Festival Grounds. He stated that during
a major earthquake, if all bridges gave way, citizens
could not leave the City.
Mr. Hirdler stated the City would have to have their
own evacuation center until roads could be repaired.
He explained that the multipurpose room at the La
Quinta Middle School when finished can be used. An
Emergency Operating Center would have to be staffed
with a minimum of 15 people, which would come from
City Staff.
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(Community Services Page 2 April 30, 1990
Commission
Mr. Molina asked if the volunteers are trained in
Emergency Services.
Mr. Hirdler replied that as of now they are not
trained.
Mr. Molina offered advice to Mr. Hirdler on a
training program for Emergency Services Protection.
Mrs. Franke stated the City of La Quinta needs a
collection point.
Mr. Hirdler explained that a Disaster Plan is
scheduled out in two weeks and collection points for
La Quinta will be listed.
FIRE PROTECTION SERVICE
Mr. Hirdler explained the need for the Special Tax
Measure on the June ballot for up-grading Emergency
Services.
Mr. Hirdler explained that Riverside County will start
billing for their services, as they are operating at a
loss. In order for the City to upgrade its services,
which includes two paramedic/firefighters it will
cost the City approximately $400,000.00. The City
feels the best way to do this is through a Special
Tax. Monies would be generated on an equivalent
dwelling unit basis. An equivalent dwelling unit
would be considered a 2,500 sq. ft. house. The Hotel,
vacant land, mobile homes and commercial property
would pay their fair share. The Cost would be
determined after the election, but the City Council
has put a limit of $120.00 dollars per dwelling unit.
Mr. Hirdler explained that 2/3 of the actual people
voting would have to pass Measure Q.
Mrs. Mendoza questioned other Cities methods. Mr.
Hirdler explained that other Cities have a Fire
Assessment District.
Mr. Hirdler explained that the City cannot campaign
for Measure Q.
7b
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( REPoRTZ & INFORMATIONAL ITm: b
COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION
MINUTES
MARCH 26, 1990
Regular meeting of the Comunity Services Commission was called
to order at the hour of 7:00 P.M. followed by the Pledge of
Allegiance.
PRESENT: Comissioners Beck, Benedict, Kennedy, Mendoza and
Chairwoman Ladner
ABSENT: Comissioner Molina
MOTION It was moved by Mrs. Ladner, seconded by Mrs. Kennedy
to excuse Mr. Molina due to a death in his family.
WRITTEN COMMUNICATION None
PUBLIC COMMENT None
Mrs. Ladner appointed Elaine Franke to the Human Services
Comittee. Mrs. Franke accepted.
OLD BUSINESS
1. HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
b. Presentation of the New Leaf Awards":
Truman School: Christina Jones
Adams School: Vanessa Carrillo
Jodie Dobbs
Thomas Flowers
Cassandra Hayes
Rey Hernandez
Stephanie Mendoza
Jessica Murphy
Vanessa Valdez
Timothy Wolter
La Quinta Middle School: Maximo Anguamo
Timica Betts
Thomas Brinkman
Andrienne Clavijo
Jeffrey Dengering
Matthew Dengering
Donnie Dennis
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(Comunity Services Page 2 March 26, 1990
Commission
La Quinta Middle School continued: Denise &onzales
Gabriela Gutierrez
Jason Harmon
Christopher Jones
Exdeyna Lizarraga
Francisco Lopez
Trent Loveless
Christopher Moreno
Patricia Munoz
Ignacio Otero
Elizabeth Partida
Eddra Reid
Miguel Solis
Jeremy Tanner
Marlene Vazquez
Lizette Vela
1. PARKS AND RECREATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Mrs. Ladner introduced Mrs. Lucy Swain, General
Manager of Coachella Valley Recreation District.
Mrs. Swain presented flyers to be distributed at City
Hall. Mrs. Swain stated the District is growing, and
is in the process of annexing Thousand Palms into its
District. Mrs. Swain reported on activities the Parks
& Recreation District is organizing for the Spring &
Summer Months.
Mrs. Swain explained what the District will be doing
with state grant funds for La Quinta. Mrs. Swain said
the programs are going fine through the District.
Mrs. Ladner asked Mrs. Swain how the Park &
Recreation District is supported. Mrs. Swain
explained it is Incorporated by the State as a Special
District. The District gets 1/3 of 1 percent of the
assessed valuation. The assessed valuation is 7
Billion Dollars. The District also applies for CDBG
Grants.
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL
MINUTES
APRIL 17, 1990
Regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council was called to
at Zne
hour of Z P.M. Z Mayj-Z ZZCZ'1Z1 Z by the
Pledge of Allegiance.
PRESENT: Council Members Bohnenberger, Bosworth, Rushworth,
Sniff, Mayor Pena
ABSENT: None
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
The following changes were made to the agenda:
1. Removed 9d from the Agenda.
2. Changed Consent Item 3 to Business Session No. 10.
3. Changed Consent Item 12 to Business Session No. 11.
4. Consider Business Session No. 1 prior to Public Hearings.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
BUSINESS SESSION
1. CONSIDERATION OF PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION ON
HILLSIDE CONSERVATION ZONE AS RECOMMENDED BY ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSERVATION COMMITTEE.
Mr. Herman advised that on March 13th, the Planning
Commission reviewed the recommendation of the Environmental
Conservation Committee and on a 2-1-2 vote, chose not to
make a recommendation to the Council.
FRED WOLFF, Chairman of the Environmental Conservation
Committee, expressed concern about the Planning Commission's
view of the environment, which appears to be opposite of
where the Council is. He suggested that in the future,
when applicants for Planning Commission are being
interviewed that they be questioned as to their view of the
environment to assure compatibility with the Council and the
residents. He believed that there is no way to preserve our
wilderness areas other than the method recommended by the
Committee. They asked the following of the Council:
1. To make it a goal to turn the privately owned land in
the hillsides to publicly owned land;
2. For one year, as an initial implementation period, do
not approve any development in that area; and
3. During that year, make every effort to turn the
privately owned land into publicly owned land at no loss to
the owner.
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(City Council Minutes Page 2 April 17, 1990
He believed that their proposal is legally defensible and
suggested that the alternative to an action this evening is
for the nZembers of the Committee to go to the people.
JEFF SMITH, a 15 year resident of the City supported the
recommendations of the Committee.
ALLEN LEVINE, 42-600 Cook, Palm Desert, Vice President of
Sunrise, supported the preservation of the hillsides in its
natural state and applauded the Council for considering land
exchanges as proposed; however, they would be opposed to a
funding mechanism if it's done through developers fee or
through a single funding source other than through a sales
tax revenue.
Mayor Pena applauded the Committee's efforts and noted that
the Council has expressed its? feelings that they are
categorically opposed to development in the hillsides.
MOTION It was moved by Mayor Pena, seconded by Council
Member Bohnenberger, as follows.
1. That, in order to protect in perpetuity, the open spac
areas of La Quinta it shall be the stated 1Zng-range goal of
the City Council to work with private property owners to
prepare an implementation plan to enable and facilitate the
transfer to public ownership without interference with the
owners property value of all currently held private parcels
in the area designated as 1'Open Space" in the General Plan.
2. That, to achieve this goal, this City Council commit
itself to a one year implementation period, during which no
development projects will be approved in the designated area.
3. Within 90 days, the City will have outlined a program to
implement the goal, and within six months the City Council
shall review the program.
4. That, at the end of one year, the City Council assess
the success of this program and provide the appropriate
adjustments or changes to continue the implementation of the
goal.
In response to Council Member Sniff, Ms. Brady, City
Attorney, advised that her office has previously presented
advise to the Council through a confidential memorandum. In
that memo, some of the legal risks associated with some of
these actions were outlined. The Council is within their
right to declare such a policy and implement it.
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(City Council Minutes Page 3 April 17, 1990
Discussion on the motion continued with Ms. Brady advising
that her office will look at the motion and determine if
there are a:iy Zther actIZns necessary relating to a
moratorium.
Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE ORDER NO. 90-34.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. PUBLIC HEARING ON SPECIFIC PLAN 89-014 FOR A COMMERCIAL
SHOPPING CENTER WITH APPROXIMATELY 618,000 SQ. FT. OF FLOOR
AREA ON 60 + ACRES AND ACCEPTANCE OF PLANNING COMMISSION
REPORT OF ACTION FOR PLOT PLAN 90-434 TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION
OF PHASE I & III OF THE PROJECT FIVE MAJOR STORES AND
RETAIL SHOPS) IN THE C-P-S ZONE AND CONFIRMATION OF
ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION. PROPERTY IS BOUNDED BY
WHITEWATER STORM CHANNEL; HIGHWAY 111; ADAMS AND WASHINGTON
STREET. APPLICANT: TRANSPACIFIC DEVELOPMENT CO.
Mr. Herman advised that this is a continued public hearing.
At the last meeting the Council wished to have some of the
conditions clarified. He proceeded to reviewed these
conditions as outlined in the staff report. An additional
condition is being proposed stating that if any existing
drive-thru facilities are banned by the SQMD, the developer
will be required to remove the facilities and landscape and
irrigate those areas to the satisfaction of the City within
6 months of the ban. Regarding Condition No. 44 relating to
a fire mitigation fee, he noted that the Council may wish to
eliminate that condition.
In response to Council Member Bohnenberger, Mr. Herman
advised that the letter from Coachella Valley Water District
dated January 5, 1990 will be included in Condition No. 68.
PETER ADAMS, President of Transpacific Development Co.,
asked that Condition 44 be deleted. He questioned the
timing on the dedication of land referred to in Condition
68. Regarding Condition 54 Washington Street access), he
advised that they have agreed to move the access further
from the Highway 111 intersection at the northern boundary
of the project. This will allow for that to become a
four-way intersection in the future. Both City and
developer's Engineers have determined that there will be
adequate stacking noting that there is sufficient room for
three lanes on the bridge.
Regarding the Wal-Mart elevations, he advised that what they
have is what was approved by the Planning Commission, they
have not officially been approved by Wal-Mart, which they
are 98% certain of their participation in this project.
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u ( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u!( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u"( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u#( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u$( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u%( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u&( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u'( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02
d_u(( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
12-29-1998-U01
03:23:17PM-U01
BASIC-U01
CC-U02
05-U02
15-U02
1990-U02