1988 04 05 RDA Minutes% LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MINUTES
APRIL 5, 1966
Regular meeting of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency was called
to order by Chairman Hoyle.
PRESENT: Mr. Bohnenberger, Mrs. Cox, Mr. Pena, Mr. Sniff, Mayor
Hoyle
ABSENT: None
HEARINGS
BUSINESS SESSION
2. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION SELECTING A PROJECT AREA AND
APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAN.
Mr. Harvey, Finance Director, presented the Board Members
with a draft resolution for adoption which selects a project
area and approves a preliminary plan. The background
material from the Consultant was included in the Boards
agenda material.
RESOLUTION NO. 86-4
A RESOLUTION OF THE LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY RECEIVING THE PRELIMINARY PLAN AND RELATED DOCUMENTS
RELATIVE TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA NO. 2 AND DIRECTING
TRANSMITTAL TO CERTAIN PUBLIC OFFICERS AND ENTITIES.
MOTION It was moved by Board Member Bohnenberger, seconded
by Board Member Pena that Resolution No. 88-4 be adopted.
Motion carried by the following vote:
AYES: Members Bohnenberger, Cox, Pena, Sniff, Chairman
Hoyle
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: None
ABSENT: None
1. REPORT ON PUBLIC MEETING ON REDEVELOPMENT PHASE I UPPER
COVE.
Mr. Reynolds, Public Works Director reported on the public
meeting held at the Community Center to get the property
owners input. There are 669 lots in the survey area with 541
different property owners. Of the 541 questionnaires mailed,
135 responded representing 25% of the property owners.
BIB]
07-19-1996-U01
12:52:13PM-U01
RDAMIN-U02
04-U02
05-U02
1988-U02
%Redevelopment Agency 2 April 5, 1988
Minutes
He presented a tabulation of the survey results which showed
an interest in sewer installation and a slight interest
in gas and quite a bit of interest in undergrounding
telephone. However, if electricity and cable isn't
undergrounded, there isn't much need in undergrounding
telephone.
In answer to questions by Council, Mr. Kiedrowski advised
that the intention at this time is get some direction from
the Board as to how to proceed. If the Board is desirous of
going ahead with an assessment district, then the Consultant
will be notified to come back in with a detail of procedures
with a calendar.
Mr. Pena felt that the total costs need to be layed out.
Mr. Reynolds stated that it's difficult to arrive at exact
costs, because of the complexities of each individual
residence. In addition to the assessment of $1,105 there
will be a $1,500 capacity charge by Coachella Valley Water
District when the lateral is run to the property line.
There will also be a cost to the homeowner for a plumber to
hook into the lateral and to abandon the septic tank.
Mrs. Cox questioned the method of spreading the costs and Mr.
Reynolds advised that it can be done by dwelling unit; by
lot; by area of the lot; by front footage or anything that
the bond counsel says is equitable. Each phase of the
improvements will have the same opportunity to protest out.
Mr. Sniff questioned the mechanism for a final protest by the
property owner and Mr. Kiedrowski advised that a letter
will be sent to each property owner giving them that
opportunity.
Mr. Bohnenberger commented that these improvements will add
to the value of their property.
In answer to Mrs. Cox, Mr. Kiedrowski advised that the total
costs could be included in the assessment, but that isn't
practical, since many property owners don1t intent to build
for several years and therefore, don't wish to incur the cost
at this time. To do so, would be, in effect, requiring
everyone to hook-up.
Mr. Bohnenberger favored proceeding with an assessment
district to bring in sewer and gas lines and to ask staff to
come back with the time frames and various impacts.
MOTION It was moved by Mr. Bohnenberger, seconded by Mr.
Pena that staff proceed with an assessment district for sewer
and gas for Phase I. Motion carried unanimously. MINUTE
ORDER? NO. 88-9.
BIB]
07-19-1996-U01
12:52:13PM-U01
RDAMIN-U02
04-U02
05-U02
1988-U02
% Redevelopment Agency 3 April 5, 1988
Minutes
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF MARCH 15, 1968.
2. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER.
MOTION It was moved by Mrs. Cox, seconded by Mr. Sniff that
Consent Items 1 and 2 be approved as submitted with Item No.
2 being approved by RESOLUTION NO. 88-5. Motion carried
unanimously. MINUTE ORDER? NO. 88-10.
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned upon
motion by Mr. Pena, seconded by Mrs. Cox and carried.
ctfu11y ubAtted?
SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, secretary
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
BIB]
07-19-1996-U01
12:52:13PM-U01
RDAMIN-U02
04-U02
05-U02
1988-U02