1996 09 17 RDA Minutes: LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MINUTES
SEPTEMBER 17, 1996
Regular meeting of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency was called to order by
Chairman Sniff.
PRESENT: Board Members Adolph, Henderson, Holt, Perkins, Chairman Sniff
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC COMMENT None
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Confirmed
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Henderson/Holt to approve the Minutes
of August 6, 1996 as submitted. Motion carried with Board Member Adolph
abstaining.
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Adolph/Holt to approve the Minutes of
August 20 and September 3,1996 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
BUSINESS SESSION
1. CONSIDERATION OF AN EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATION AGREEMENT WITH
CATELLUS RESIDENTIAL GROUP REGARDING 48 AVENUE AND JEFFERSON
STREET DEVELOPMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO
SIGN THE AGREEMENT.
Mr. Spevacek, Consultant with Rosenow, Spevacek Group, advised that on July
22, 1 996, the Agency Board directed staff to enter into negotiations with the
Catellus Residential Group regarding the planning and development of
approximately 39 acres owned by the Agency at 48th Avenue and Jefferson
Street. The agreement provides that the Agency will exclusively negotiate with
Catellus Residential Group for a period of ninety-days or until December 23,
1 996 for the Agency and Developer to formulate a development plan, identify
BIB]
10-31-1996-U01
03:57:10PM-U01
RDAMIN-U02
09-U02
17-U02
1996-U02
:Redevelopment Agency Minutes Page 2 September 17,1996
development needs and costs, and outline funding and implementation
responsibilities in connection with site development. The agreement also
provides that two community meetings will be held to gain input during plan
development and finalization activities. The agreement also allows for another
1 20 days from the Board's acceptance of the site development plan to
negotiate a disposition and development agreement and prepare and process
required environmental and other land-use applications. Thirdly, it also calls for
a final 30-day period during which time, the Agency and Developer will consider
a ODA. He noted that the action before the Board will, in no way, obligate the
agency.
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Adoiph/Holt to authorize execution
of an Exclusive Negotiation Agreement between La Quinta Redevelopment
Agency and the Catellus Group regarding the 48th/Jefferson Street development
and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. Motion carried unanimously.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTERS DATED AUGUST 20, SEPTEMBER 3 &
17, 1996.
2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURY REPORTS DATED JUNE 30 & JULY 31, 1996.
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Henderson/Holt to approve the
Consent Calendar as recommended. Motion carried unanimously.
STUDY SESSION
1. DISCUSSION OF A BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT AND RETENTION PROGRAM.
Mr. Weiss, Assistant City Manager, advised that the City/Agency has
undertaken a number of efforts to enhance its economic development planning
efforts including enhancements to the staffing levels, adoption of an Economic
Development Plan and within that plan, adoption of specific plan implementation
policies. Included within those implementation policies is one entitled
Facilitation of Business Retention & Expansion." It has been suggested that
staff pursue the Plan and Policies by developing and/or itemizing programs that
might be available to the Agency in support of business retention.
BIB]
10-31-1996-U01
03:57:10PM-U01
RDAMIN-U02
09-U02
17-U02
1996-U02
:Redevelopment Agency Minutes Page 3 September 17,1996
Mr. Spevacek, Consultant with Rosenow, Spevacek Group, proceeded to review
a number of programs which could be customized to fit specific circumstances
in La Quinta. The programs reviewed included: 1) a partnership with private
lending institutions in which the Agency could fund closing costs; buy down
interest rates, or serve as the lender of last resort; 2) a partnership with Inland
Empire Lender's Community Development Corporation, in which the Agency
could issue standby letters of credit or make micro loans to fund fixtures,
equipment, inventory, or working capital; 3) establish a Business Incubator
Program, which would involve underwriting some or all of the costs associated
with building a business facility which could provide low-rent office or industrial
space for start-up businesses that would relocate once the business was
established and 4) Enterprise Zone, which provides federal tax incentives to
businesses that export goods and who employ the disadvantaged.
Mr. Weiss advised that if the Council wishes for staff to pursue any one of
these programs they can come back to the Board with the cost parameters.
Chairman Sniff advised that his vision of this issue is to: 1) encourage the
location and initiation of new businesses to fill our vacant store-fronts; 2) a
means or method to work with lending institutions hopefully, local) to provide
the bulk of the loan in which the Agency would buy-down the interest fees; and
3) help to keep existing businesses that may be struggling. He hoped to involve
the Chamber of Commerce in developing a business support menu with multiple
options they could present to business owners.
Board Member Holt wished to see the Agency move forward with a plan. She
asked if the Agency can issue letters of credit and Mr. Spevacek advised that
the Agency cannot unless it deals with a property rehabilitation loan. A letter
of credit would be equal to the loan amount given, so we would have to
establish a criteria as to the amount. Ms. Honeywell, Agency Counsel, advised
thai the Agency is somewhat limited in helping in these different areas. She
noted that the City, as a general law city, is faced with much the same problem,
however, converting to a charter city would be a great benefit in developing
these kinds of programs.
Board Member Henderson advised that she isn't real pleased with the Inland
Empire Lender's Community Development Corporation because they support
minority and women owned businesses and she felt that everyone should be
supported on an equal basis. Nor was she impressed with the Enterprise Zone
and wished to see some kind of report from them before pursuing that avenue.
Chairman Sniff felt that should the charter not pass, there are still some things
we can do and he hoped that the Chamber of Commerce will be included.
BIB]
10-31-1996-U01
03:57:10PM-U01
RDAMIN-U02
09-U02
17-U02
1996-U02
:Redevelopment Agency Minutes Page 4 September 17, 1 996
In response to Board Member Holt, Mr. Spevacek advised that we could provide
a capital pool to a lending institution and they would then issue a letter of credit
to guarantee payment on a loan that could either be issued by the SBA or some
other lending institution. Also, the City could issue a letter of credit to act as
a co-signer on a loan. Micro loans for equipment, etc. cannot be RDA funds.
Board Member Perkins stated that, he too, was not enthused with the Enterprise
Zone. He expressed strong support for lending assistance toward business
retention. He didn't see any sense in bringing in a new business and losing two.
Board Member Adolph expressed concern about the City becoming a financial
institution although he understood that we need to be supportive of existing
businesses, but he didn't want to see the City get in a position of having to
open a new department of the City to run such a program.
The Board directed staff to establish a more detailed. program for presentation
possibly in early November.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
1. TRANSMITTAL OF REVENUE & EXPENDITURES REPORTS DATED JUNE 30.
and JULY 31,1998.
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Holt/Henderson to receive and file
the Revenue & Expenditures Reports dated June 30, and July 31, 1996.
Motion carried unanimously.
CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBERS' ITEMS None
BIB]
10-31-1996-U01
03:57:10PM-U01
RDAMIN-U02
09-U02
17-U02
1996-U02
: CLOSED SESSION
1. CONFERENCE WITH AGENCY'S REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT
TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING POTENTIAL TERMS
AND CONDITIONS OF ACQUISITION AND/OR DISPOSITION OF REAL
PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 48TH AVENUE AND
ADAMS STREET. PROPERTY OWNER NEGOTIATOR: TOM BIENEK.
2. CONFERENCE WITH AGENCY'S REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT
TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 78-250 HIGHWAY 111 INSTRUCTING THE NEGOTIATOR
CONCERNING AN AMENDMENT TO THE OWNER/PARTICIPATION
AGREEMENT. NEGOTIATOR: TS RESTAURANTS.
The Board reconvened with no decision being made which requires reporting pursuant
to Section 54957.1 of the Government Code Brown Act).
There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned.
Ajj;;;II;;ubm;;; secretary
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
BIB]
10-31-1996-U01
03:57:10PM-U01
RDAMIN-U02
09-U02
17-U02
1996-U02