1998 02 17 RDA Minutes LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MINUTES
FEBRUARY 17, 1998
Regular meeting of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency was called to order by
Chairman Perkins.
PRESENT: Board Members Adolph, Henderson, Pena, Sniff, Chairman Perkins
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC COMMENT None
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
Board Member Pena asked that Consent Calendar Item No.4 be moved to Business
Session Item No.4.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION It was moved by Board Members SniffiHenderson to approve the Minutes
of February 3, 1998 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously.
BUSINESS SESSION
1. CONSIDERATION OF THE DISPOSITION AND SALE oF UP TO THREE HOMES
OF THE 49 SINGLE-FAMILY HOMES THAT COMPRISE THE LA QUINTA
RENTAL HOUSING PROGRAM.
Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that staff, having
reviewed four options regarding the disposition of 49 single-family homes in the
La Quinta Rental Housing Program, is recommending that the Agency retain
ownership of the units and sell up to three per year. Therefore, this is a request
to allow the sale of up to three units from the La Quinta Rental Housing
Program and to authorize funding in the amount of $200,000 to upgrade
various units which were built in 1 988 and in need of some repair. Staff is also
recommending waiver of the 95% loan-to-value ratio criteria contained in the
Rehabilitation Loan Program, subject to the applicant being a very-low or low-
income household, the property being 20 years old or more and occupied by the
owner, and the loan request being less than $10,000. Waiving the criteria will
assist in rehabilitating some of the older homes in the Cove.
BIB]
03-11-1998-U01
04:25:16PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
02-U02
17-U02
1998-U02
is I
Redevelopment Agency Minutes 2 February 1 7, 1 998
Board Member Henderson asked how the funds would be distributed and if the
contractors' licenses would be verified.
Mr. Spevacek, consultant with RSG, advised that once the itemized budget
prepared by the homeowner's contractor is approved by staff, the funds will be
placed in a construction draw account to be used for the repairs. The final
release will not occur until after the filing deadline for filing mechanics liens
against the property. The contractor must have a contractor's license,
workman's compensation insurance, and a Cit* business license.
In response to Board Member Pena, Mr. Spevacek advised that staff is
proposing the City be responsible for maintaining the landscaping once the units
are repaired.
Board Member Sniff questioned the construction date and asked staff to verify
it.
In response to Board Member Adolph, M*. Spevacek advised that the renters are
currently responsible for maintaining the property, but some have failed to do
it and have let the properties get rundown. Staff feels that if the Agency is
responsible for maintenance, that the investment in repairing the units won't be
short-lived. The renters are not required to provide property insurance as the
properties fall under the City's umbrella insurance policy.
Board Member Adolph felt the City should have insurance coverage for damages
caused by the renters.
In response to Board Member Pena, Mr. Spevacek advised that the renters must
qualify for the County's Section 8 Program and that La Quinta Real Estate is
supposed to run background checks on each one. He advised that there have
been few delinquencies in rent and few instances of excessive abuse. He
further advised that the units were in mixed repair when they were purchased
two years ago and the proposed improvements are basic normal repairs.
Board Member Henderson asked if this involved the Building Horizon's Program
to which Mr. Spevacek responded no, but advised that staff is looking to get
them involved with two other units.
In response to Board Member Sniff, Ms. Honeywell, Agency Counsel, advised
that loss of the renters' personal belongings would be covered under the City's
liability insurance if the house shbuld be destroyed because of faulty wiring,
etc., but not if it's due to natural disasters such as floods.
BIB]
03-11-1998-U01
04:25:16PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
02-U02
17-U02
1998-U02
Redevelopment Agency Minutes 3 February 17, 1 998
Board Member Pena commented on the possibility of using some of these units
to house artists and artisans as discussed in the past and Mr. Spevacek advised
that it would be a challenge to have the ability to have enough space for artist
lofts. Zoning for such mixed-use may be*included in the Village Specific Plan
Update.
In response to Board Member Sniff, Mr. Spevacek advised that the best units
would probably be sold first, also taking into consideration those units in which
the current tenants qualify and wish to purchase them.
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Sniff/Adolph to retain the current
ownership structure for the La Quinta Housing Program and continue with the
sale of up to three units per year to very-low-income households; to authorize
the appropriation of up to $200,000 from the La Quinta Rental Housing
Program funds to refurbish various units; to authorize the Executive Director to
execute the necessary contracts as the need occurs; and, to waive the 95%
loan-to-value criteria contained in the Rehabilitation Loan Program based upon
the four criteria contained in the staff report. Motion carried unanimously.
2. CONSIDERATION OF AN APPROPRIATION OF NOT TO EXCEED $95,000
FROM PROJECT AREA NO.1, LOW AND MODERATE-INCOME HOUSING FUND
TO ACQUIRE AND REHABILITATE A SINGLE-FAMILY HOME LOCATED AT 77-
224 CALLE ENSENADA UNDER THE CITY'S REHABILITATION PROGRAM AND
AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT FOR
PURCHASE AND SALE OF REAL PROPERTY BY AND BETWEEN OLIVER E.
FULLER AND THE LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY.
Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that in October 1997,
staff presented a list af 10 homes for the Agency to consider as part of the
Agency's purchase and rehabilitation program and that only one of those units
remains available. The property owner of another unit at 77-224 Calle
Ensenada, has asked the City to purchase his property and after negotiating a
purchase agreement with the property owner, staff is recommending
appropriation of $55,000 to acquire and up to $40,000 to rehabilitate the
property from Project Area No.1 Low-Mod Housing Fund.
Board Member Pena wished to see photographs of the property before moving
forward with this.
In response to Board.Member Pena, Mr. Herman reviewed the purpose of the
rehabilitation program and advised that the subject property needs to be either
rehabilitated or razed and noted the possibility of asbestos being present.
BIB]
03-11-1998-U01
04:25:16PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
02-U02
17-U02
1998-U02
Redevelopment Agency Minutes 4 February 17, 1998
Board Member Sniff wasn*t sure the property is worth rehabilitating and felt
perhaps it should be razed.
In response to Board Member Adolph, Mr. Herman advised that the property has
been red-tagged by the Building & Safety Department for being unfit to occupy.
He further advised that staff is looking for authorization to purchase and
rehabilitate the property. If after further review; rehabilitation doesn*t seem to
be an option, staff will bring it back for authorization to raze it.
Board Member Pena questioned why the property owner hasn*t been required
to comply with certain conditions.
Mr. Herman advised that the intent of the rehabilitation program is to improve
the Cove by using redevelopment housing funds.
Board Member Sniff felt perhaps more discretion should be used in selecting the
houses and that the property owners of houses such as this, should be made
to either fix or remove the houses.
In response to Board Member Henderson, Mr. Spevacek advised that one of the
two houses selected in November is in probate and staff is negotiating with the
family to complete that purchase. The house on Ensenada came up because of
the numerous code violations and staff is concerned about the impact it might
have on the neighborhood if the owner fixes it up and rents it to less than
desirable renters again. In addition to using the housing funds to promote
affordable housing, the Agency is trying to use the funds to clear away some
of the blight in the Cove such as this house. Staff is not proposing to begin
rehabilitation, but rather to purchase it for further consideration.
Board Member Pena continued to wish to see photographs of the house.
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Sniff/Henderson to continue the
consideration to purchase and rehabilitate property at 77-224 CalIe Ensenada
to March 3, 1 998. Motion carried unanimously.
3. CONSIDERATION OF AUTHORIZATION TO PROCEED WITH THE REFUNDING
OF TWO LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY BOND ISSUES: THE 1991
PROJECT NO.1 BONDS AND THE 1992 PROJECT NO.2 BONDS.
Mr. Falconer, Finance Director, advised that staff is requesting authorization to
proceed with the refunding of the 1991 Project No.1 Bonds and the 1992
Project No.2 Bonds. In refunding the Project No.1 bonds, staff projects raising
BIB]
03-11-1998-U01
04:25:16PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
02-U02
17-U02
1998-U02
Redevelopment Agency Minutes 5 February 17, 1 998
$6.5 million in new monies and in refunding Project No.2 bonds, $1.7 million.
However, refunding Project No.2 bonds will require renegotiation of the Pass-
Through Agreement with the County which could result in less funds.
In response to Board Member Adolph, Mr. Falconer advised that staff will come
back for authorization to issue the bonds in approximately 30 days.
Board Member Sniff supported moving forward with the Project No.1 bonds,
but felt staff might need some latitude in dealing with the Project No. 2 bonds
because of the Pass-Through Agreement.
Mr. Genovese, Executive Director, advised that authorization is needed to
proceed with rate negotiations and that this issue will come back to the Agency
prior to the bonds being issued.
In response to Chairman Perkins, Mr. Genovese advised that in regard to the
Pass-Through Agreement, we need to renegotiate the payment schedule and
will most likely offer some funds up front to reduce the payments in succeeding
years.
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Sniff/Henderson to authorize staff
and the bond refunding team to proceed forward and refund the 1991 Project
Area No.1 and the 1 992 Project Area No.2 Tax Allocation Bonds. Motion
carried unanimously.
4. CONSIDERATION OF ACCEPTANCE OF BID FOR ASSESSMENTISEWER HOOK-
UP FEE SUBSIDY PROGRAM PROJECT NO.98-02, DENBOER ENGINEERING
& CONSTRUCTION.
In response to Board Member Pena, Mr. Hartung, Building & Safety Director,
confirmed that DenBoer Engineering & Construction would be subcontracting
out the work, but staff has looked at the specifications and has determined that
the general contractor is not required to complete a certain percentage of the
work.
Board Member Pena was concerned about the subcontractor doing the work
under another contractor's license.
Mr. Hartung advised that the subcontractor was unable to do it on his own
because of the bonding issues which DenBoer is handling and he noted that
DenBoer has done this on four previous projects which were acceptable to the
City and completed in a timely manner.
BIB]
03-11-1998-U01
04:25:16PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
02-U02
17-U02
1998-U02
Redevelopment Agency Minutes 6 February 17, 1998
In response to Board Member Henderson, Mr. Hartung advised that any licensed
subcontractor can hook-up sewers on private property without placing a yearly
bond with CVWD.
Board Member Adolph asked if staff had any concerns with this and if the
subcontractor is a local contractor.
Mr. Hartung advised that staff has no concerns with it and that the
subcontractor and engineering firm are both local contractors from Cathedral
City.
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Sniff/Adolph to accept the low bid
from DenBoer Engineering & Construction for the hook-up of 1 7 sewers in the
amount of $27,397. Motion carried with Board Member Pena voting NO.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED FEBRUARY 17, 1998.
2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED DECEMBER 31, 1997.
3. ACCEPTANCE OF ASSESSMENT/SEWER HOOK-UP FEE SUBSIDY PROGRAM
PROJECT NO. 97-05 AND AUTHORIZATION TO FILE A NOTICE OF
COMPLETION.
4. SEE BUSINESS SESSION ITEM NO.4.
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Sniff/Adolph to approve the
Consent Calendar as recommended and amended. Motion carried unanimously.
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
1. TRANSMITTAL OF REVENUE & EXPENDITURES REPORT DATED DECEMBER
31, 1997.
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Sniff/Henderson to receive and file
the Revenue & Expenditures Report dated December 31, 1997. Motion carried
unanimously.
CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBERS' ITEMS None
BIB]
03-11-1998-U01
04:25:16PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
02-U02
17-U02
1998-U02
Redevelopment Agency Minutes 7 February 1 7, 1 998
CLOSED SESSION None
PUBLIC HEARINGS None
There being no further business, it was moved by Board Members Sniff/Adolph to
adjourn: Motion carried unanimously.
Re pe tfully submitted,
UNDRA
L. JUHOLA, Secretary
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
BIB]
03-11-1998-U01
04:25:16PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
02-U02
17-U02
1998-U02