1999 06 15 RDA Minutesd_v LA QUINTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
MINUTES
JUNE15, 1999
Regular meeting of the La Quinta Redevelopment Agency was called to order by
Chairman Perkins.
PRESENT: Board Members Adolph, Henderson, Pena, Sniff, Chairman Perkins
ABSENT: None
PUBLIC COMMENT None
CLOSED SESSION
1. Conference with Agency?s real property negotiator, Mark Weiss, and the subject
property negotiator, Richard Oliphant, pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.8 concerning potential terms and conditions of acquisition and/or
disposition of real property located at the southeast corner of Miles Avenue and
Washington Street.
The Agency recessed to Closed Session to and until the hour of 3:00 p.m.
3:00 P.M.
The Agency adjourned to 7:00 p.m.
7:00 P.M.
The Agency reconvened with no decision being made in Closed Session which requires
reporting pursuant to Section 54957.1 of the Government Code Brown Act).
Chairman Perkins noted that Board Member Pena was absent.
PUBLIC COMMENT None
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA Confirmed
BIB]
07-20-1999-U01
09:59:17AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
06-U02
15-U02
1999-U02
d_vRedevelopment Agency Minutes 2 June 15, 1999
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Sniff/Henderson to approve the Minutes
of June 1, 1 999, as submitted. Motion carried with Board Member Pena ABSENT.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED JUNE 15, 1999.
2. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED APRIL 30, 1999.
3. AUTHORIZE THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY
DOCUMENTS TO INITIATE AND COMPLETE THE PURCHASE OF THE
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 78-226 AVENIDA LA FONDA, AND APPROPRIATE
$85,000 $70,000 TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY AND UP TO $15,000 TO
DEMOLISH THE PROPERTY).
A brief discussion ensued regarding Item No. 3 wherein Mr. Herman,
Community Development Director, advised that once the building and septic
system have been removed and the land is stabilized, staff will come back with
a recommendation for the vacant land.
Board Member Adolph suggested some consideration be given to constructing
shade structures for the Senior Center on that land.
Mr. Herman noted that housing funds are being used to purchase the property.
Mr. Genovese, Executive Director, suggested if there's some consideration to
use the land for parking, that funds from Redevelopment Project Area No.1 be
utilized.
The Board concurred.
MOTION It was moved by Boai? Members Sniff/Adolph to approve the
Consent Calendar with amended language for funding on Item No.3. Motion
carried with Board Member Pena ABSENT.
BUSINESS SESSION None
BIB]
07-20-1999-U01
09:59:17AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
06-U02
15-U02
1999-U02
d_vRedevelopment Agency Minutes 3 June 15, 1999
STUDY SESSION
1. DISCUSSION OF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMS FOR THE UPCOMING FIVE-
YEAR IMPLEMENTATION PLAN.
Mr. Herman, Community Development Director, advised that the Agency's
adopted Five-Year Implementation Plan expires in December 1 999, and that
staff is seeking input as to projects and programs for the upcoming five years.
The current plan, which was adopted in December 1 994 and updated in March
1 998, contains non-housing and housing projects/programs for Project Areas
1 and 2, and it deals with modification of the Second Trust Deed Loan Program,
which is recommended to be used only for new or substantially-rehabilitated
units. There's also a recommendation to establish a City-wide residential
rehabilitation loan program, which will require the use of non-housing monies
or the General Fund. The plan also deals with the purchase and resale of
dwellings with second trust deeds and affordability covenants, with
recommended policies listed in the staff report. He advised that the input
received from the Board will be incorporated into the new Five-Year
Implementation Plan, which will be scheduled for a public hearing in July. For
clarification, he advised that the staff report identifies items that have been
accomplished in the various project areas, and it lists items for Council's
consideration to be included in the new Five-Year Implementation Plan, both
housing and non-housing.
Board Member Henderson felt the Second Trust Deed Program is wonderful, and
wished to make sure that it's understood, noting that a family was recently told
that they probably wouldn't qualify because the house is not new, even though
it was new when they moved into it two years ago under a lease/purchase
agreement. She wasn't sure how new" is being interpreted in the program,
and felt perhaps a policy decision is needed.
Ms. Honeywell, Agency Counsel, advised that she felt it would qualify as new"
as long as they can show that there was some type of lease/purchase
agreement, wh'?n the house was new, whereby they would purchase the homeA
oon as thbV were financially able. However, renters w?o decide that they
want to purchase the home after they've moved in, would not qualify.
Board Member Henderson understood the program allows the Agency to fund
homes that are not new or rehabilitated, but that the City doesn't get credit for
them.
In response to Board Member Perkins, Mr. Herman advised that the low-income
house cost can be up to $150,000 with a subsidy of up to $50,000. A
BIB]
07-20-1999-U01
09:59:17AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
06-U02
15-U02
1999-U02
d_vRedevelopment Agency Minutes 4 June 15, 1999
moderate-income house is more, and a very-low-income house is less than
$150,000.
Chairman Perkins felt the Agency should concentrate on those units that will
provide credit.
The Board concurred.
In response to Chairman Perkins, Mr. Herman advised that substantially-
rehabilitated is defined under Redevelopment Law as the cost being 25% or
greater than the unit's existing assessed value."
Chairman Perkins wished to have staff look at the situation referred to by Board
Member Henderson to see if such purchase/leases would qualify.
Board Member Sniff asked if a single mother earning $25,000 to $26,000 a
year could qualify for a low-income home,
Mr. Herman advised that she would have to qualify for the first loan, and then
the City would provide the second.
Mr. Herman then asked for direction regarding the establishment of a residential
rehabilitation loan program, to be funded with non-housing funds or the General
Fund.
Board Member Henderson wished to get through the budget hearings and then
bring it back for discussion to see if it can be done without putting pressure on
other things.
Chairman Perkins wished to see the program go ahead, but concentrating first
on those things that give the City credit. He encouraged staff to bring it back
in July.
Mr. Herman asked for direction regarding the suggested policies outlined on
Page 7 of the staff report with respect to the pu?hase and resale of homes th??
have the Agency's second trust deeds and affordability covenants.
The Board concurred with the suggested policies.
Mr. Genovese advised that the residential rehabilitation program will come back
to Council for discussion in a study session, and the rest of the items will come
back in a public hearing in July.
BIB]
07-20-1999-U01
09:59:17AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
06-U02
15-U02
1999-U02
d_v Redevelopment Agency Minutes 5 June15, 1999
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
1. STATEMENT OF REVENUE & EXPENDITURES REPORT DATED APRIL 30,
1999.
MOTION It was moved by Board Members Sniff/Adolph to receive and file the
Revenue & Expenditures Report dated April 30, 1999. Motion carried with
Board Member Pena ABSENT.
CHAIR AND BOARD MEMBERS? ITEMS None
PUBLIC HEARINGS None
There being no further business, it was moved by Board Members Sniff/Henderson to
adjourn. Motion carried with Board Member Pena ABSENT.
Re?ectfulIy submitted,
SAUNDRA L.JUHO LA, Secretary
La Quinta Redevelopment Agency
BIB]
07-20-1999-U01
09:59:17AM-U01
ADMIN-U01
RDAMIN-U02
06-U02
15-U02
1999-U02