1996 04 02 CCing -> 140 City Council
Agenda
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBER
78-495 CaIle Tampico
La Quinta, California 92253
Regular Meeting
April 2, 1996 3:00 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
a. Pledge of Allegiance Beginning Res. No.96-18
b. Roll Call Ord. No.283
CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. Approval of Minutes of March 9 & March 1 9, 1 996.
ANNOUNCEMENTS
PRESENTATIONS
PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please
complete a request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes.
Please watch the timing device on the podium.
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE
1. LETTER FROM NORRIS BERNARD RESIGNING FROM THE HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION
EFFECTIVE JUNE 30, 1996.
2. LETTER FROM RICH KENNY ON BEHALF OF FLAGS FOR FUN REGARDING A DISPLAY OF
CALIFORNIA CITY FLAGS.
BUSINESS SESSION
1. CONSIDERATION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE
FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT.
Al MINUTE ORDER ACTION.
2. CONSIDERATION OF TERMINATION OF CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF FRITZ BURNS
PARK/PALM ROYALE PARK WITH JAMES T. DUNPHY COMPANY FOR CAUSE.
A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION.
3. CONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-1, FISCAL YEAR 1996/97.
A) RESOLUTION ACTION 12).
4. CONSIDERATION OF SELECTION OF BROKER/DEALERS FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA LISTING
OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS.
A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION.
5. CONSIDERATION OF AIRLINE SERVICE COMMITTEE REQUEST FOR FUNDING.
A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION.
6. SECOND READING OF ORDINANCE NO.281 RE: SIGN ORDINANCE
282 RE: TRUANCY
Page 2
000002
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140CONSENT CALENDAR
NOTE: Consent Calendar Items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion.
1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED APRIL 2, 1996.
2. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY PAUL BERLIER, IN THE AMOUNT OF $120,000,
DATE OF LOSS, FEBRUARY 20, 1996.
3. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY ANTHONY SILVA IN THE AMOUNT OF $120,000,
DATE OF LOSS, FEBRUARY 20, 1996.
4. DENIAL OF CLAIM FOR DAMAGES FILED BY DANIEL AND DIANNE FRANCO, DATE OF LOSS,
SEPTEMBER 13, 1995, AMOUNT UNKNOWN.
5. FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS TO PGA WEST TRACTS 20717-3 & 4, 28146-2, 4 &
5, 24317-1, 25499-1 & 2 AND 25500-3.
6. APPROVAL OF FINAL MAP AND SUBDIVISION AGREEMENT FOR TRACT 28034- SOUTH VALLEY
ESTATES.
7. APPROVAL OF SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT PROPOSAL TO THE STATE HISTORIC PRESERVATION
OFFICE FOR THE CERTIFIED LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROGRAM FOR FUNDING OF THE CULTURAL
RESOURCES SURVEY.
8. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT FINDINGS IN CONNECTION
WITH THE AGENCY'S AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT.
9. AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE FINANCING STATEMENT
CHANGE. THE REQUEST FOR FULL RECQNVEYANCE DEED OF TRUST AND TRANSMIT THE
SAME TO CHICAGO TITLE WHICH WILL TERMINATE THE CITY'S INTEREST IN THE
WASHINGTON SQUARE PROPERTY.
STUDY SESSION
1. DISCUSSION REGARDING LANDSCAPE DESIGN CONCEPT FOR THE COVE AREA URBAN
FORESTRY PROJECT NO.95-10.
2. DISCUSSION REGARDING THE FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, FISCAL YEARS
1996/97 THROUGH 2000/2001.
Page 3
000003
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
A. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 12, 1996
B. HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES OF MARCH 6,1996
C. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES OF FEBRUARY 12, 1996
D. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS
E. SUNLINE REPORTS
F. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY
G. RIVERSIDE COUNTY FREE LIBRARY ADVISORY COMMITTEE
H. SUNLINE TRANSIT AGENCY
I. COACHELLA VALLEY MOSQUITO ABATEMENT DISTRICT
J. ALL OTHER BOARDS/COMMISSIONS/JPA'S
K. REPORT OF PALM SPRINGS REGIONAL AIRPORT COMMISSION TOM FREEMAN
DEPARTMENT REPORTS
A CITY MANAGER
1. STATUS REPORT ON SOLID WASTE FRANCHISE NEGOTIATIONS WITH WASTE
MANAGEMENT OF THE DESERT.
2. RESPONSES TO PUBLIC COMMENT.
B. CITY ATTORNEY
C. CITY CLERK NONE
0. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR NONE
E. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR NONE
F. FINANCE DIRECTOR NONE
G. PARKS & RECREATION DIRECTOR
1. UPDATE ON CONTRACT WITH BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF COACHELLA VALLEY,
LA QUINTA UNIT.
H. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR NONE
I. SHERIFF'S STATION COMMANDE? NONE
MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS
RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING
RECESS UNTIL 7:00 PM
Page 4
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140PUBLIC COMMENT
This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for public hearing. Please
complete a request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes.
Please watch the timing device on the podium.
PRESENTATIONS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
1. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT 95-051 & ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT 96-312
REQUEST TO AMEND THE CITY'S LAND USE MAP OF THE GENERAL PLAN TO
REMOVE THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL OVERLAY FROM VARIOUS PROPERTIES
APPROXIMATELY 615 ACRES) THAT ARE DESIGNATED LOW-DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
LDR) GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 52ND AVENUE, EAST OF
JEFFERSON STREET, AND NORTH OF 55TH AVENUE. APPLICANT: DWIGHT STUART,
WALLY FRIEND AND THE CITY OF LA QUINTA.
A) RESOLUTION ACTION 2).
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 96-023 & PLOT PLAN 96-571 & ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT 96-311 REQUEST TO DEVELOP 11.65 ACRES WITH A 116-UNIT,
AFFORDABLE APARTMENT COMPLEX ON THE WEST SIDE OF WASHINGTON STREET,
700-FEET NORTH OF CALLE TAMPICO. APPLICANT: KEITH INTERNATIONAL, INC.
FOR USA PROPERTIES).
A) RESOLUTION ACTION 2).
3. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION OF PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REGARDING
ACQUISITION OF REAL PROPERTY AT THE NORTHWEST INTERSECTION OF HIGHWAY
111 AND WASHINGTON STREET.
A) RESOLUTION ACTION.
Page 5
oooo?
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140CLOSED SESSION
1. CONFERENCE WITH CITY'S PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54956.8 CONCERNING POTENTIAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF ACQUISITION
AND/OR DISPOSITION OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SIMON
DRIVE AND HIGHWAY 111. PROPERTY OWNER NEGOTIATOR: RICHARD GATTIS.
2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING ONGOING LITIGATION, GRANITE
CONSTRUCTION, CASE NO.086195, PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9(al.
ADJOURNMENT
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I Saundra L Juhola, City Clerk of the City ot La Quinta, California, do hereby declare that the
foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of April 2 1996 was posted on the outside entry to the
Council Chamber, 78-495 CalIe Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of
Commerce and at Albertsons on Friday, March 29, 1996.
ED March29 1996
Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
PUBLIC NOTICE
The La Quinta City Council Chamber is handicapped accessible. If special equipment is needed for the
hearing impaired, please call the City Clerk's Office at 777-7025, 24-hours in advance of the meeting
and accommodations will be made.
Page 6
OOOU?6
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE:
NORRIS S. BERNARD March 20, 1996
44-550 Marguerite
La Quinta, CA 92253-4830
Mayor Holt and Members of City Council
Staff and Members of the HUman Services Commission 619)360-1841
It is with deep regret that I find I must resign from the
Human Services Commission.
Since the forming of HSC, I have been an active member and I
don't believe I missed more than one meeting. I've served on
the Safety, Gang and Senior Citizens committees. Along with
other members of this commission, we did some training with
the American Red Cross and I have been selected as their
assistant coordinator for the Disaster Action Team, here in
the Coachella Valley.
D.A.T. reponds to small disasters to provide food, clothing
and shelter to fewer than six families of need.
I would like to serve the commission until the end of June,
when your council will recruit for the next fiscal year.
I wish the very best to the other commission members as
there remains much to be accomplished in the realm of human
services in La Quinta.
Sincerely,
Norris S. Bernard
Human Services Commissioner Date: March 20, 1996
300007
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE:
p-
j I'?,-;- lu Ph-
CT c?
Flag ColIect? FLAGS FOR FUN RICH KENNY
Mambef 4412 St.
N? America VexIllologIcal Ass?IatIori Oakl??d C?
94?19
11 March 1996
Office of the Mayor
City of La Quinta
48795 Calle Tampico
La Quinta, CA 92253
Dear Honorable Mayor:
It is with great pleasure that I, in cooperation with the California State Railroad Museum,
announce this once-in-a-lifetime display of California City Flags. The display will be installed
in the California State Railroad Museum in Old Town Sacramento the first part of June 1996
and run at least through October 1996. The generation of this display was to be in conjunction
with the 30th annual Convention of the North American Vexillological Association NAVA), an
association which promotes the scholarly research and documentation of flags, which will be
meeting at the Fountain Suites Hotel in Sacramento 11 13 October 1996. Your help is needed
to make this the most spectacular display that has been done from this collection of over 480 full
size U.S.City Flags. My last display was of Ohio City Flags in the Main Library Downtown
Cincinnati of 55 Ohio City Flags. I know of 115 City Flags in California. Please help me honor
your city by donating a full size flag of La Quinta preferably 3?5 or 4x6') to be displayed with
the many other flags of the Proud Cities of California.
These flags are, as well, being documented to preserve this part of the History of the
United States and its parts. In this light I need from you the information listed on the enclosed
flyer. Unfortunately many City Flags have already been lost and it is my purpose to not let
another one slip into anonymity. I am appealing to your civic pride to assist in this quest, only
with your help can I maintain this part of your history. The flags will become part of my
collection which will be donated to the Smithsonian Institute when their purpose with my
collection is served. Please send Flag and info to address below.
To Honor your city I strive
Vexillologically,
WY
Rich Kenr??
Researchel/Collector
U.S.City Flags
4412 Masterson St.
Oakland, CA 94619
510)531-5170
000008
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 0
z
AGENDA CATEGORY:
OF BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
IThM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Consideration of a Lease Agreement Between the City of PUBLIC HEARING:
La Quinta and The Family YMCA of the Desert
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Lease Agreement between the City of La Quinta and The Family YMCA
of the Desert.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The lease agreement specifies under Section 3.1 that Rent in the amount of $1.00
per year be paid by the YMCA to the City of La Quinta. The Rent is collected in
advance of the commencement date for the full term of the lease.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The first lease agreement between the City of La Quinta and the Family YMCA of the
Desert was approved by City Council on February 5, 1991 with a commencement
date in August, 1991. The agreement was amended on June 4, 1991 to provide for
priority placement for residents of La Quinta in the child care program. That lease
agreement will expire in August, 1 996. Attached is the revised lease agreement
between the City of La Quinta and the Family YMCA of the Desert to continue child
care services at the La Quinta Child Care facility for another five years with the term
ending in the year 2001. Changes from the original lease agreement have been
underlined.
The Family YMCA of the Desert offers child care at the La Quinta Child Care facility
Monday through Friday, 7 A.M. to 6 P.M., year round. The program's enrollment is
currently full with La Quinta residents having priority in placement decisions.
u()()fl 1?
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140
Revisions to the lease agreement are:
1 Changing the address for the City of La Quinta;
2. Changing the commencement date for the lease to reflect execution of
agreement;
3. Eliminating the City's ownership of YMCA's purchased furniture and equip
ment;
4. Allowing the City the right to schedule the facility for community organization
use during hours the YMCA does not use the facility; and
5. Clarification that the City must authorize and select contractors for major
repairs to the facility.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council are:
1 Approve the Lease Agreement between the City of La Quinta and
the Family YMCA of the Desert;
2. Do not approve the Lease Agreement; or
3. Provide staff with further direction.
Marty Nich&?on
Parks & Recreation Director
OOO()13
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140" NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140# NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140$ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140% NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140&C,
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Consider Termination of Contract for Construction PUBLIC HEARING:
of Fritz Burns Park I Palm Royale Park with James
T. Dunphy Company for Cause
RECOMMENDATION:
Terminate contract for construction of Fritz Burns Park I Palm Royale Park with James
T. Dunphy Company for Cause.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
There are no fiscal implications associated with this recommendation.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
During the City Council meeting of June 20, 1 995, the City Council awarded a
contract for construction of the Fritz Burns Park and Palm Royale Park to the James
T. Dunphy Co. of Palm Springs, California.
James T. Dunphy Co. Contractor") was issued a notice to proceed" on Monday,
August 7, 1995. As specified in the project documents, the project was to be
completed within 90 consecutive calendar days from the date specified in the notice
to proceed. The date of completion was scheduled for November 6, 1995, due to
additional scope of work being added to the contract, 3 days were added to the
length of the contract.
On November 27, 1995, the Contractor was notified that he would be incurring
additional costs for inspection since the project was not completed within the time
specified. As specified in the contract documents;
the Contractor will pay to the City the amount of the actual damage
incurred by the City caused by the Contractor's failure to complete the
work in the time agreed."
On February 21,1996, the Contractor was notified of the costs $22,538) that had
been accrued through February 1 6, 1 996. During previous conversations with Staff,
the Contractor stated that problems with the landscaping subcontractor not being
able to perform in a timely manner had contributed to the delay in performance.
f)OOU3?
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140'On March 1 2, 1 996, the Contractor and his surety were served notification that he
was 1 24 days over the scheduled completion date, and therefore was in material
breach of the contract. He was notified to complete all remaining contract work on
or before April 1, 1 996. In the event all work was not completed by the stipulated
time, Staff would bring this matter before the City Council for consideration to
terminate said contract. Staff is recommending that the City Council consider James
T. Dunphy's past performance on City contracts in the event he is apparent low
bidder on future City projects.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
As of the March 1 2, 1 996, notification", the Contractor was approximately 93%
complete with all work. Since that time Staff has noted a marked increase in the
Contractor's productivity. The Contractor has put in a substantial amount of man-
hours to attempt to bring the project to a close. However, it remains to be seen as
of this writing 3/26/96) if the project will actually be completed within the revised
time line stipulated.
To date, the following expenditures towards this contract have been made:
Total contract value $894,944
Percent Complete 92.4%
Amount held in retention $ 82,717
Balance to Finish
Total $150,487
Of the amount to finish, $13,200 is for an additional 9 months landscape
maintenance. Currently, $33,701 has been accrued toward additional costs for
inspection through March 1, 1 996. The contractor's most recent pay request 3/7/96
for $30,418) has not been processed pending further direction from the City Council).
Alternatives for the City Council to consider:
1. Terminate the existing contract with the James T. Dunphy Company for
construction of Fritz Burns Park and the Palm Royale Park, for cause. This
action will require staff to seek quotes to finish the remaining contract work.
Depending upon quotes received, utilize retainage monies to pay or call upon
performance bonds. The potential for an even longer time to completion also
exists.
2. Take no action at this time, and allow the James T. Dunphy Company to
complete the remaining contract work.
David M. C spe Public Works Director/City Engineer
ooo?3'q
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140( 0
CP4o%??
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCIL?DA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION:
Consideration of Preliminary Engineer's Report
for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District PUBLIC HEARING:
No.89-i, Fiscal Year 1996/97
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Adopt a Resolution approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for Landscape
and Lighting Assessment District 89-1, Fiscal Year 1996/97;
2. Adopt a Resolution declaring intention to levy annual assessments for
construction, maintenance and servicing landscape and lighting improvements
within the boundaries of the territory included in the Citywide Landscape and
Lighting Assessment District 89-1, and giving notice thereof.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Adoption of either Resolution will not fiscally commit the City to any costs.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
In 1989, the City Council formed a Citywide Landscape and Lighting Assessment
District to fund costs associated with the maintenance, construction and servicing of
City parks, landscape areas, street lights and traffic signals. Pursuant to the
Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972, the City must annually perform a series of
activities, as outlined in Attachment 1.
The Engineer's Report is required by the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 and
must include the following information:
1. A description of the services to be provided throughout the District.
2. Total costs necessary to provide all services described in the report.
3. A diagram showing the boundaries of the District, including special
benefit zones.
4. An assessment schedule.
OO(.)?)4O
f:\pwdept\counoiI\co9Bmtgs\960402a
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140)The second change involves the annual CPI adjustment allowed in the Engineer's
Report. Previously, the annual CPI adjustment was allowed to range from a minimum
of 0% to a maximum cap of 5%. In future years, it is proposed to have a basement
cap of 2.5%, instead of 0%, to the annual adjustment. Therefore, the annual CPI
adjustment would range between 2.5% to 5%. The need for the adjustment is as
follows:
* A minimum rate of less than 2.5% produces an insignificant change to
the total revenue generated by the District.
* A basement cap would help to offset those years in which the CPI
exceeds 5%.
Generally, the annual CPI adjustment will fall between 2.5% and 5%, as evidenced
by the 10 year average of 3.61% annual CPI for the Los Angeles, Anaheim, Riverside
Area. This change will not affect this year's assessments.
To proceed with the proposed changes to the District as outlined above) the Council
must approve the preliminary Engineer's Report and schedule a Public Meeting and
Public Hearing date to allow affected property owners an opportunity to provide
public testimony regarding the proposed changes. Aporoval of the preliminary
Engineer's Report does not obligate the City to the fees proposed. Only after the
Public Meeting and Public Hearing has been conducted, can the Council adopt
assessment fees for Fiscal Year 1996/97. The Public Meeting is tentatively scheduled
for the May 21, 1996, City Council meeting, followed by a Public Hearing tentatively
scheduled for the June 4, 1996, City Council meeting. Upon conclusion of the Public
Hearing, the Council can approve the assessment levels based upon testimony
received at the Public Meeting and Hearing.
The Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 allows the option of noticing the Public
Meeting/Hearings for citywide districts through the newspaper or by individual
notices. Berryman & Henigar have proposed to prepare notices for every property,
including printing of notices, stuffing and mailing in City-provided envelopes with City-
provided postage. The cost to provide approximately 14,000 individual notices is
approximately $10,200. In FY 1995/96, the City Council opted to notice the Public
Meeting and Hearing in the newspaper, avoiding $10,000 in costs. The cost to
notice in the newspaper is approximately $250.00). Attachment 2 is the proposed
Notice.
UOO()41
f:\pwdept\counciI\oo?6mtgs\?6o4o2a
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140*FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
To proceed with the recommended changes proposed in the preliminary Engineer's
Report for Landscape and Lighting Assessment District No 89-1, the City Council
must:
* Adopt a Resolution approving the Preliminary Engineer's Report for
Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1, Fiscal Year 1996/97;
* Adopt a Resolution declaring intention to levy annual assessments for
construction, maintenance and servicing landscape and lighting
improvements within the boundaries of the territory included in the
Citywide Landscape and Lighting Assessment District 89-1, and giving
notice thereof.
A Public Meeting and Hearing will be scheduled to allow public testimony before the
City Council. The Public Meeting and Hearing dates will be noticed through the
newspaper. Upon conclusion of the Public Hearing, the City Council may adjust the
assessment levels as necessary and adopt a resolution confirming the assessment
diagram and assessment level.
Alternatives:
1. Approve the preliminary Engineer's Report and direct staff to notice in the
newspaper for a May 21, 1996 Public Meeting and a June 4, 1996 Public
Hearing.
2. The City Council may reject the preliminary Engineer's Report and provide
direction to the Engineer of Record of further changes. The preliminary
Engineer's Report will be revised based upon direction provided by the City
Council and returned for further consideration.
3. Provide staff with additional direction.
David sper
Public Works Director/City Engineer
Ouu42
f:\pwdept\council\cc96mtgs\960402a
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140+ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140, NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140- NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140. NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140/ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1400 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1401 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1402 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1403 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1404 z
4) AGENDA CATEGORY:
CPA' OF BUSINESS SESSION: IL
COIJNCIL?DA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Consideration of Selection of Broker/Dealer PUBLIC HEARING:
for City of La Quinta Listing of Financial
Institutions
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve Mr. Ernest Marchowsky of Dean Witter, Newport Beach Attachment No. 1)
and Mr. Ron Meraz and Mr. Aifredo Sandoval of Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith,
Inc. of Indian Wells Attachment No.2) be placed as broker/dealers on the Listing of
Financial Institutions for the City of La Quinta.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The broker/dealer fees are determined on a pertransaction basis and are included in
the cost of the security that is bought and sold. Typically, fees for one 1) year
Treasury securities would average 15 cents per $1,000 dollars, or $150 per
$1,000,000 dollars.
ISSUE AND DISCUSSION:
The attached Broker/Dealer Questionnaire Attachment No.3) was sent out to the
firms listed below based upon the following criteria 1) firms that submitted requests
to the City, 2) Investment Advisory Board recommendations and 3) staff
recommendations.
Broker/Dealer Questionnaires Mailed or Delivered:
Bank of California, Los Angeles
Dean Witter, Newport Beach
International Securities, Group, San Diego
Merrill Lynch, Indian Wells
Paine Webber, Indian Wells
Prudential Securities, Indian Wells
Smith Barney, Palm Desert
Wells Fargo Bank, Indian Wells
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1405In addition to reviewing the completed questionnaires, staff also contacted the
National Association of Security Dealers NASD) and State of California Corporations
Department to disclose disciplinary actions that may have been taken, and reviewed
financial statement information. Staff has also personally met with each of the
broker/dealers being recommended.
The results can be summarized as follows:
Met requirements
Did not meet requirements
Declined to respond
The results are as follows:
Bank of California Did not meet requirements
Dean Witter Met requirements
International Securities Group Did not meet requirements
Merrill Lynch Met requirements
Paine Webber Declined to respond
Prudential Securities Declined to respond
Smith Barney Declined to respond
Wells Fargo Bank Declined to respond
The goal of staff was to have three broker/dealers to obtain quotes from when trading
investments, however only two have met the requirements set forth in the
broker/dealer questionnaire. Staff will continue to seek a third broker/dealer in the
future. However, we do not want to delay the diversification of the investment
portfolio and are not in a position to recommend a third broker/dealer at this time.
The Investment Policy only requirestwo bids. Staff believes that the additional time
needed to select another broker/dealer would not result in significant savings based
upon the types of investments that will be purchased e.g., Treasury Bills).
The Corporate Resolutions and Investor Agreement have been reviewed by the City
Attorney and are attached Attachments No. 1 & 2). In addition to staff's
recommendation, the Investment Advisory Board took action at their March 1 3, 1 996
meeting to recommend these broker/dealers.
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1406FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available are:
1. Approve the selection of broker/dealers as recommended by the Investment
Advisory Board;
2. Deny the approval of the broker/dealer.
John M Falconer
Finance Director
Attachments:
1. Ernest Marchowski of Dean Witter, Newport Beach Corporate Trading
Authorization Agreement.
2. Mr. Ron Meraz and Mr. Aifredo Sandoval of Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith,
Inc. Indian Wells, Corporate Trading Authorization Agreement.
3. Broker/Dealer Questionnaire.
OOUJL?4
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1407 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1408 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1409 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140: NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140; NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140< NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140= NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140> NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140? NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140@ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140BC//7?\o
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: April 2,1996
CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TITLE:
STUDY SESSION:
Consideration of Airline Service Committee
Request for Funding PUBLIC HEARING:
RECOMMENDATION:
Direct staff to include $20,000 in the Fiscal Year 1996/97 budget, monitor Airline
Service Committee accomplishment and provide the Council with a status report in
March of 1997.
FISCAL IMPLICATION:
Estimated Actual Cost: $60,000; $20,000 for each of the next three fiscal years
beginning FY 1996/97.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
On July 6,1993, the City of La Quinta contributed $3,000 to the Airline Task Force
now the Airline Service Committee), which was established by the JPA of the Palm
Springs Desert Resorts Convention and Visitor's Bureau PSDRCVB) to study the issue
of airline service to the Coachella Valley at the Palm Springs Regional Airport. On
April 5, 1994, and again on March 7,1995, the City Council authorized expenditures of
$20,000 to the Airline Service Committee ASC) based upon a three year program.
The ASC, in correspondence dated March 1, 1996, requested that the City of La
Quinta continue to set aside money in future budgets for the Committee pursuant to a
funding formula based upon contributions to the PSDRCVB see Attachment 1).
Historically, due to multi-year funding restrictions on cities, the City of La Quinta has
addressed funding for the ASC one year at a time as part of its annual budget process.
The ASC has previously provided data to the PSDRCVB outlining ASC's scope,
objectives and impact Attachment 2). ASC reports a ten percent increase in
passengers enplaned/deplaned from 1993 to 1995. The increase of 49,475 deplaned
passengers, assuming a value of $474 per passenger, equates to $23.5 million in hotel
revenue.
p /
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140CNancy Doria, Director of Airline Development, has indicated that Indian Wells and
Cathedral City have committed future funding to the ASC and that she expects Palm
Springs and Palm Desert to consider same in the very near future. Ms. Doria will be
present to explain ASC?s request and address any questions the Council might have.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the Council are:
1. Direct staff to include $20,000 in the FY 1996197 budget, monitor ASC
accomplishment and provide the Council with a status report in March of
1997:
2. Pledge support for the three year program and direct staff to include $20,000
in the FY 1996197 budget for the first year of the ASC program;
3. Direct staff to include $20,000 in the FY 1996/97 budget contingent upon
program participation by other Coachella Valley cities;
4. Deny the request;
5. Request additional information.
Mark Weiss
Assistant City Manager
CL7
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140D NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140E NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140F NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140G NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140H NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140I NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140J NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140K NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140M NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140N NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140Offl,*
4
*
OF
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION
COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: APRIL 2, 996
CONSENT CALENDAR
ITEM TITLE:
STUDY SESSION
Demand Register Dated April 2, 1996 PUBLIC HEARING
RECOMMENDATION: Approve Den?and Register Dated April 2, 1996
BACKGROUND:
Prepaid Warrants:
24646 24652? 4,620.64
24653 24657? 20,608.50
24658 24669? 30,425.83
Wire Transfers? 246,616.75
PIR I3385-13463? 72,704.64
P/R Tax Transfers? 22,461.51 CITY DEMANDS $551,138.73
Payable Warrai?ts:
24670 24792 210,251.66 RDA DEMANDS 56,550.80
$607,689.53 $607,689. 53
FISCAL_IMPLICATIONS:
Demand of Cash City $551,?38.73
Joh NI. Falconer, inance Director
OO()079
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140P NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140Q NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140R NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140T NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140U NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140V NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140W NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140X NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140Y NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140Z NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140[ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140\ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140] NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140^ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140_ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140` NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140a NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140b NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140c NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140d NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140e NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140f NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140g NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140h NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140i NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140j NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140k NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140l NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140n NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140o NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140p NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140q NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140r NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140s NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140t NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140u NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140v NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140w NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140x NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140y NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140z NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 BUSINESS SESSION NO.
ORDINANCE 281
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA
QUINTA, CALIFORNIA AMENDING CHAPTER 9.212 OF THE
LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE.
The City Council of the City of La Quinta does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Chapter 9.212 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, is hereby deleted.
SECTION 2. There is hereby added to the La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 9.160
which is to read as contained in Exhibit A" hereby attached.
SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in flill force and effect
thirty 30) days after its adoption.
SECTION 4. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this
Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designed by resolution of the City
Council; shall certily to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance
and its certification, together with proof of posting to be entered into the book of Ordinances of the
City of La Quinta.
The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council
of the City of La Quinta held on this day of____________ 199 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
GLENDA HOLT, Mayor
City of La Quinta, California
ATTEST:
SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk
City of La Quinta, California
DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney
City of La Quinta, California
orddrfi053 0127
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 BUSINESS SESSION NO.
ORDINANCE NO.282
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING CHAPTER 11.56 OF TITLE 11 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE REGULATION OF
CURFEW AND TRUANCY
WHEREAS, the existing curfew ordinance only defines curfew, no provision in the
ordinance allows for the enforcement of the ordinance or the imposition of any penalties for
violations. In addition, the existing ordinance has no provisions which allow for the curfew of
school age children who are truant in our community during school hours; and,
WHEREAS, it is important that our youth attend school on a daily basis. It is only through
a quality education that opportunities for success will materialize in their fliture. Also, it is a
common belief amongst educators that there is a direct link between attendance and achievement in
the classroom; and,
WHEREAS, our schools receive state flinding on the basis of how many students attend
class each day. When a student is absent, our local schools suffer financially; and,
WHEREAS, although State Education Code Section 48264 empowers a peace officer to
arrest minors for truancy, it is more effective to address truancy problems with a specific city
ordinance. Such an ordinance mandates additional judicial responsibilities to both the juvenile and
the parent; and,
WHEREAS, the proposed amendment will prohibit any minor under the age of eighteen who
is subject to compulsory education, from loitering in a public place during the days that school is in
session between the hours of 7:30a.m. and 2:10p.m., with exceptions provided which include those
minors that are considered mancipated" as defined by the Family Code Section 7002.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, does hereby
ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. That Title 11, Chapter 11.56, is hereby adopted to read as follows:
Underlined text denotes proposed amendment)
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 1
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIILE: STUDY SESSION:
Denial of Claim for Damages Filed PUBLIC HEARING:
by Paul J. Berlier, Date of Loss
February 20, 1 996
RECOMMENDATION:
Reject the Claim for Damages filed by Paul J. Berlier, date of loss February 20, 1 996.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The amount of the claim is $1 20,000.00.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The attached claim Attachment #1) filed by Paul J. Berlier, date of loss February 20,
1 996, was forwarded to the Coachella Valley Joint Powers Insurance Authority
CVJPIA). The CVJPIA, as indicated in Attachment 2, recommends that the City
Council deny the claim.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council are:
1. Reject the claim as recommended by the CVJPIA;
2. Pay the claim.
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140&
0
1
5:
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COIJNCIL?DA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TITLE: STUDY SESSION:
Denial of Claim for Damages Filed PUBLIC HEARING:
by Anthony Silva, Date of Loss
February 20, 1 996
RECOMMENDATION:
Reject the Claim for Damages filed by Anthony Silva, date of loss February 20, 1 996.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The amount of the claim is $120,000.00.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The attached claim Attachment #1) filed by Anthony Silva, date of loss February 20,
1 996, was forwarded to the Coachella Valley Joint Powers Insurance Authority
CVJPIA). The CVJPIA, as indicated in Attachment 2, recommends that the City
Council deny the claim.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council are:
1. Reject the claim as recommended by the CVJPIA;
2. Pay the claim.
000166
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR: IL
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Denial of Claim for Damages Filed PUBLIC HEARING:
by Daniel Franco and Dianne Franco,
Date of Loss September 1 3, 1 995
RECOMMENDATION:
Reject the Claim for Damages filed by Daniel Franco and Dianne Franco, date of loss
September 13, 1 995.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The amount of the claim has not been identified by the claimant.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The attached claim Attachment #1) filed by Daniel Franco and Dianne Franco, date
of loss September 1 3, 1 995, was forwarded to the Coachella Valley Joint Powers
Insurance Authority CVJPIA). The CVJPIA, as indicated in Attachment 2,
recommends that the City Council deny the claim.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The alternatives available to the City Council are:
1 Reject the claim as recommended by the CVJPIA;
2 Pay the claim when the amount is identified
John M. Falconer
Finance Director
00171
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 $7
AGENDA CATEGORY:
I'OF?? BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCILJRDA MEETING DATE: April 2,1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Final Acceptance of PGA West Tracts 20717-3 & 4, PUBLIC HEARING:
21846-2, 4 & 5, 24317-1, 25499-1 & 2, and 25500-3
RECOMMENDATION:
Accept PGA West Tracts 20717-3 & 4, 21846-2, 4 & 5, 24317-1, 25499-1 & 2, and
25500-3.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
Final acceptance of twelve PGA West tracts was postponed at the March 1 9, 1 996
Council meeting after the PGA West Residential Association #1 the Association)
contested release of security. The Association wished to retain the security as a
resource in their efforts to recoup some pavement sealing costs from the developer,
Sunrise Company.
The City had required slurry sealing of certain streets prior to acceptance of
improvements at several of the tracts. Before Sunrise accomplished the slurry
sealing, the Association sealed these streets as part of a larger sealing program.
Of twelve tracts for which acceptance was postponed at the March 19, 1 996 Council
meeting, nine are not sub]ect to the dispute and are reintroduced here for final
acceptance. The first six tracts listed above were not among those the City required
to be sealed. The rest are located in a different residential association.
The locations of these nine tracts within PGA West are shown on Attachment 1.
Security holdings and proposed release scenarios are shown in Attachment 2.
OOO1?7
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The Public Works Department has determined that improvements at the listed tracts
comply with the City?s standards for final acceptance. The alternatives available to
the Council are:
1 Approve acceptance of the listed tracts and authorize the release of security as
outlined in Attachment 2;
2. Deny acceptance of any or all of the tracts on a finding that obligations of the
Subdivision Improvement Agreement(s) have not been satisfied.
David M. C er, P lic Works Director/City Engineer
FB/fb
OOOi??
f:\pwdept\council\cc96rntgs\960402h
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Approval of a Final Map and Subdivision Agreement PUBLIC REARING:
for Tract 28034 South Valley Estates
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Final Map and Subdivision Agreement for Tract 28034 South Valley
Estates.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
Shown in Attachment 1, this tract lies along 58th Avenue, south of PGA West.
Improvements within this subdivision, including grading, interior streets, storm
drainage, retention basin, walls, utilities, landscaping, and monumentation have been
completed. Per Section 66499 of the Subdivision Map Act, those improvements need
not be secured. The Subdivision Improvement Agreement included herewith secures
deferred improvements to Avenue 58 and the subdivider?s share of the cost of a
future traffic signal at Avenue 58 and Madison Street.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
The subdivider has provided a final map conforming with the Subdivision Map Act and
a subdivision improvement agreement with associated securities Attachment 2). City
Council alternatives are:
1. Approve the final map and subdivision agreement.
2. Deny approval 6f the final map and subdivision agreement on a finding that one
0 documents do not comply with the tentative map, the conditions of
with provisions of the City Code.
David er, Public Works Director/City Engineer
MFImf OO1?2
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 C
C
z
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCILfltDA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996
CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Approval of the submittal of a Grant Proposal to the
State Historic Preservation Office for the Certified PUBL? HEARING:
Local Government Program for funding of the
Cultural Resources Survey.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the submittal of the grant proposal to the State Historic Preservation Office
for the Certified Local Government Program for funding of the Cultural Resources
Survey.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Staff has prepared a budget for the proposal. The budget is dependent upon at least
a 40% in-kind match from the City. The total in-kind match of 13,616.53 will
consist of staff time, volunteer time, office supplies and space, mileage, printing
costs, etc. The grant money will be used to pay for professional consultant fees. The
grant amount requested in the proposal is $15,000. The total value of the project,
including the City match portion will be approximately $28,000.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
Staff has prepared a grant proposal seeking funding for the Cultural Resources Survey
from the Certified Local Government CLG) Program. Being a CLG entitles the City
to compete for funds set aside just for certified governments. For the 1996 grant
cycle the Historic Preservation Commission will apply for funds to conduct the city-
wide survey. Such a survey is a priority preservation project for CLG's.
On October 3, 1995, the City Council approved the distribution of a Request for
Proposals RFP) for a City Survey of Cultural Resources and Sites with the condition
that a grant proposal be submitted to seek funds to cover professional consultant
fees. On January 5, 1996, staff distributed the RFP to qualified consultants. Twelve
proposals were received by the February 29, 1996 deadline.
On January 16, 1996, the Council appointed Council Members Sniff and Henderson
to serve on the Consultant Selection Committee for this project. The Historic
Preservation Commission appointed two members to the Selection Committee at their
meeting on March 21, 1996. Commissioners Millis and DeMersr??an were selected.
cclrn.aO I
o00191
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140Staff members Christine di lono, Planning Manager and Leslie Mouriquand, Associate
Planner will also serve on the Selection Committee.
The RFP calls for the selected consultant to conduct a comprehensive survey for
historic structures and sites, to document them and assess their significance
according to the Secretary of the Interior's standards. For archaeological resources,
the consultant will conduct a record search and prepare a detailed sensitivity map for
use in planning and environmental decisions. The final products will consist of all
identified historic sites being recorded on the appropriate SHPO forms, all data on
computer disks, and a final report.
Several forms are included in the proposal packet as required by the grant application.
Included is a Resolution required by SHPO to be adopted by the City Council giving
staff approval to submit the proposal. In addition, the packet includes other
documents for the Mayor's signature, such as an Environmental Exemption
certification, Drug-Free Workplace certification, and Civil Rights Assurance of
Compliance. The packet also includes a Preservation Plan, maps, resumes of staff
and the Historic Preservation Commission, a copy of the City's Historic Preservation
Ordinance, and a letter of support from County Supervisor Wilson. The deadline for
submittal of the proposal to SHPO is May 1, 1996.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
Staff recommends the following findings:
1. Title 7 Historic Preservation Ordinance requires that a survey of the City's
historical resources be conducted in accordance with the terms of the City's
certification by the Certified Local Government Program, the State Historic
Preservation Office, and the Secretary of the Interior; and,
2. The certification requirements of being a Certified Local Government require
that a survey be conducted and maintained.
The options available to the Council are as follows:
1. Approve the submittal of the grant proposal to SHPO for the Cultural Resources
Survey funding;
2. Deny submittal of the grant proposal; or
3. Provide d ection to staff.
unity Development Director
Attachments:
1. CLG Grant Proposal Packet
2. Resolution
ccIm?1 2 000192
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 z
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCIL?DA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Adoption of a City Council Resolution Approving Public PUBLIC HEARING:
Improvement Findings in Connection with the
Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Project
RECOMMENDATION:
* Adopt a resolution approving Public Improvement Findings in connection with
the Redevelopment Agency's Affordable Housing Project.
* Authorize the expenditure of $236,325 for costs associated with the design of
improvements to Washington Street and Miles Avenue.
* Authorize the expenditure of $283,500 for costs associated with the design of
improvements to Avenue 48 Adams Street to Jefferson Street).
* Notify City Council of the need to contract for professional services as required
by Resolution No.93-28.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Staff is requesting expenditures from the Redevelopment Agency Project Area No.2
low mod housing fund. The amounts of $236,325 Washington Street and Miles
Avenue improvements), and $283,500 Avenue 48, Adams Street to Jefferson Street
improvements) will be expended for costs associated with design.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
The City Attorney has prepared the attached Resolution making the necessary
findings to permit the expenditure of funds for the development to the public
improvements along Miles Avenue/Washington Street. The public improvements
identified in the resolution are determined to: 1) be a benefit to the project area and
the immediate neighborhood in which the project is located; 2) no other means of
financing the improvements are available to the community; 3) the payment for the
improvements will assist in providing housing for low-or-moderate income persons.
Washington Street and Miles Avenue:
Prior to construction of future low mod housing improvements in the southeast corner
of Washington Street and Miles Avenue it is necessary to install infrastructure
improvements such as water, sewer, streets, curb, gutter and sidewalk and
landscaping. This project will widen Miles Avenue and Washington Street to primary
arterial standards for westbound traffic on Miles Avenue and northbound traffic on
O()O26?
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140Washington Street.
The following costs have been identified in the 1997/1998 fiscal year Capital
Improvement Program budget for the Miles Avenue I Washington Street Widening
project:
Administration $ 131,667
Construction $2,250,71 2
Engineering & Design $ 225,071
Inspection & Testing $157550
TOTAL $2,765,000
Avenue 48 Extension Project Adams Street to Jefferson Street):
This project will provide full width improvements, including a low water crossing at
the evacuation channel, traffic signals at Adams Street, Dune Palms Road, and
Jefferson Street, and raised landscape medians on Avenue 48. The following costs
are identified within the 1996/1997 Capital Improvement Program budget for the
Avenue 48 Extension project:
Administration $ 171,140
Construction $2,978,860
Engineering & Design $ 270,000
Inspection & Testing $190.000
TOTAL $3,610,000
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
In January of 1996, the RDA and Desert Sands Unified School District DSUSD)
entered into a Disposition and Development Agreement DDA) for the construction of
certain public improvements at the intersection of Dune Palms Road and Avenue 48.
The DDA requires the City to complete construction of Avenue 48 improvements no
later than eighteen 18) months from execution of this Agreement 1/17/96).
Therefore, the Avenue 48 improvements must be completed by July 17, 1997. To
meet this schedule, design of this project must begin immediately.
Because the Avenue 48 improvements are very similar to those proposed for the
Washington Street/Miles Avenue improvements, the design of both projects could be
completed concurrently by the same engineering firm, economizing the costs and
reducing the time required to complete the design of both projects.
Should the City Council decide to take necessary actions to allow design to begin on
both projects, the City Manager and the City Council, by way of this report, are
000266
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140hereby notified of the need to contract for professional services necessary to
complete the design and preparation of plans, specifications and engineer's estimates
for both projects, as required by Resolution No.93-28.
Alternatives for the City Council to consider:
1. Approve Staff's recommendation by:
a. Adopting a resolution approving Public Improvement Findings in
connection with the Agency's Affordable Housing Project.
b. Authorizing the expenditure of $236,325 of RDA Project Area No.2 low
mod housing funds for costs associated with the design of
improvements to Washington Street and Miles Avenue.
c. Authorizing the expenditure of $283,500 of RDA Project Area No.2 low
mod housing funds for costs associated with the design of
improvements to Avenue 48 Adams Street to Jefferson Street).
d. Acknowledgment of notification of the need to contract for professional
services as required by Resolution No.93-28.
2. Provide staff with alternative direction.
David M. Cos er, Pu lic Works Directoricity Engineer
000267
G:\PWDEpT\couNcIL\?6ccMTGs\ccg6o4o2\??O4O2DWpD
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140
NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 C C,
1
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Authorize the Mayor to sign the Uniform Commercial PUBLIC HEARING:
Code-Financing Statement, Deed of Trust, and the request
for Full Reconveyance and transmit the same to Chicago
Title which will terminate the City's interest in the
Washington Square property
RECOMMENDATION:
Authorize the Mayor to sign the Uniform Commercial Code-Financing Statement, Deed of Trust
and Full Reconveyance and transmit the same to Chicago Title.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
On December 20, 1994, the Mayor signed the Certificate of Acceptance accepting the Deed of Trust
with assigns of rents, from the owners of Washington Square as security for a parcel map which they
were proposing to record to allow the sale to Desert Hospital. The sale to Desert Hospital did not
occur, and the map never recorded; therefore, the security is no longer necessary and the new owners
are requesting a release.
The City Attorney has reviewed this action and has determined it to be acceptable. Chicago Title is
requesting the execution of the Full Reconveyance including the original Note and Deed of Trust
signed and returned with the Uniform Commercial Code-Financing Statement, along with a letter
indicating that the City is transmitting the same without demand Attachment
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
Options available to the Council:
1. Execute the agreements; or
2. Continue for further information.
Attac ents: 000272
1. Letter of transmittal to Chicago Title
CIH Ond
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 0 x
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Discussion Regarding Landscape Design
Concept For The Cove Area Urban Forestry PUBLIC HEARING:
Project No.95-10
RECOMMENDATION:
As directed by the City Council.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
This is an informational report only.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
In November of 1992, the City Council, by Resolution 92-88, authorized staff to
apply to the State of California Transportation Commission for funding through the
Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation Program for the Urban Forestry Project
in the Cove Area. The Project" consists of reforestation of approximately 39 acres
directly adjacent to the Bear Creek Bike Path.
On July 18, 1995, the City Council authorized the execution of a Professional
Services Agreement with Landscape Architect, Ray Lopez, and with Environmental
Artist, Alan Sonfist, for the purpose of developing this project.
On July 24, 1995, staff was notified of the California Transportation Commission's
decision approving funding for the Urban Forestry Project. The original grant
application requested funding in the amount of $295,000 but was reduced to
$255,699 by the Transportation Commission. These funds are for the purchase of
flora and the design and installation of an irrigation system to support this plant life.
The City has budgeted $80,000 from the Community Services Project Fund for
support of items not covered under the grant guidelines i.e. labor and equipment to
assist in volunteer planting, and construction of rest stops).
On September 19, 1995, the City Council approved the execution of the
Reimbursement Agreement between the State of California, Environmental
Enhancement and Mitigation Program, and the City of La Quinta for the Cove Area
Urban Forestry Project No.95-10.
f\rn??Dt\coLInciI\ce96mt?\96O4O2'96O4O2e
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140Mr. Alan Sonfist has prepared a Master Plan. The plan is a chronological progression
down the path from south Calle Tecate & Avenida Montezuma) to north Montezuma
& Avenida Carranza). There are four zones in the proposed Master Plan. Zone 1, the
Native" Zone, consists of two subzones. The first subzone encountered focuses on
the surroundings that would have been prevalent prior to human intervention. It is
landscaped with native and existing vegetation and includes the duplication of natural
habitat and the installation of a wildlife watering habitat. The next subzone is
punctuated by additional native/indigenous plants and trees. There will be some
minor mounding with depressions that represent work performed by ancient native
American inhabitants. Zone 2 represents an agricultural period of the Coachella
Valley, highlighted by date gardens and citrus groves. Zone 3 indicates the
ornamental style of landscape architecture present during the 1950's and 60's. The
ornamental landscaping theme is further carried out in Zone 4, with native and lush
plantings including informal and formal plantings of drought tolerant plants and trees.
On February 12, and February 16, 1996, the Parks and Recreation Commission and
the Arts in Public Places Commission respectively reviewed the concept and
recommended approval by the City Council.
Additional features will be provided for Council's consideration during the
presentation of the design concept.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
Staff will revise the concept as directed by the City Council and proceed with the
preparation of plans, specifications and engineer's estimate for Council's
ior to vertising for bids.
Public Works Director/City Engineer
000275
f:\i,wdet,t\counciI\cc96r?t?96O4O2\96O4O2e
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 C1?
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCIL?DA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Discussion of Proposed Fiscal Year 1 996/97
Capital Improvement Program
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Review and provide direction regarding preparation of the 1 996/97 Capital
Improvement Program;
2. Direct staff to prepare the necessary resolution for the April 1 6, 1 996 City
Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting approving the 1 996/97 Capital
Improvement Program.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
Informational report only.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
Provided for your consideration is the City's Capital Improvement Program
commencing in the 1 996/97 Fiscal Year. The document is a statement of the City's
goals, objectives and priorities for a five 5) year Capital Improvement Program and
the financial commitments required to accomplish those objectives. The preparation
of this document has been a joint effort of the Public Works Department, the Finance
Department, and the City's Redevelopment/Financial Consultant.
The purpose of the Capital Improvement Program is to provide the City of La Quinta
with a long-range program for major municipal capital construction projects based on
the systematic development of an advanced financial plan. The Capital Improvement
Program CIP) is a five-year planning instrument used by the City to identify capital
improvement needs and to coordinate financing and timing of those needs in a
manner that maximizes the return to the public. As each annual budget is prepared,
additional projects and priority needs are developed and added to the program to
maintain a total five-year plan.
OOO27?
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140The first year of the CIP is called the capital budget". The capital budget is
incorporated into the annual City operating" budget, which appropriates funds for
specific facilities, equipment and improvements. Projects slated for subsequent years
I the program are approved on a planning basis only and do not receive ultimate
expenditure authority until they are eventually incorporated into the capital budget.
The CIP will be updated annually and can be amended at any time based on revenue
availability and changes in project priorities. As such, tentative City Council
endorsement of overall five-year program is desirable for the effective implementation
of overall City goals and objectives. Capital improvements are major projects
undertaken by the City that are generally not recurring on a long-term, annual basis.
In this sense they are differentiated from operating and maintenance O&M)
expenditures for normal City operation. They generally include: design, inspection,
testing, project administration, land and right-of-way acquisition, construction or
modification of buildings or facilities and public infrastructure construction or
modification.
The attached 1 996/97 Fiscal Year CIP includes a listing of projects by fiscal year
priority and type of improvement project. Priorities as to which fiscal year a project
I scheduled depends on the availability of specific funding sources, operation and
program needs and prior City Council policy. Projects listed as Funded" indicate that
the City currently has the existing funds to allocate to these capital improvement
projects. These existing funds" represent unencumbered or unreserved fund
balances within each fund budget unit i.e. Infrastructure Fund, Quimby Fund", etc.)
Projected as of July 1, 1996, and each fiscal year thereafter. Projects include street,
drainage, traffic signal, landscape and lighting, city facility, and park improvements.
Only those projects that have identified funding sources in the five year period are
listed within a fiscal year. Those projects that are designated as deferred do not have
an identified funding source through the term of the five year program. The
identification of additional and/or alternative funding sources will be addressed during
the annual review and approval of subsequent CIPs.
Each project is described in brief detail including a description of the project, the
location of the project, a breakdown of the project cost, the revenue sources
proposed to be used to fund the project and an estimate of the annual operation and
maintenance costs associated with the capital improvement. The completion of any
specific capital improvement project may have a direct impact on the operational and
maintenance budgets of the General Fund, Lighting and Landscaping Fund and other
funds. An estimate of these future costs is necessary to assess that there is financial
capacity of the operating budget to cover these ongoing costs. All project costs
included in the CIP are at current year project estimates. No inflation factors have
been utilized in determining costs for projects in Fiscal Year 1 997/98 through 2000-
01.
000277
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140The 1 995-96 CIP funded $6,968,981 in capital improvement projects. The status of
these projects anticipated by July, 1 996 is as follows:
Proiects Completed or in Progress Design/Construction)
* Senior Center Facility Completion
* Fred Waring Drive Widening
* Adams Street Improvements Avenue 47/Highway 111)
* Traffic Signal and Street Improvements Dune Palms Road/Miles Avenue
* Palm Royale Park
* Adams Street Crossing Improvements
* Washington Street Improvements Bridge to Simon Drive
* Fritz Burns Park
* Urban Forestry Program Cove Area
* Sports Complex Light Rehabilitation
* 4 Signal Project Adams Street/Miles Avenue, Fred Waring Drive/Adams
Street, Village Shopping Center/Washington Street and Avenida
Fernando/Eisenhower Drive
* Citywide Right-of-Way Landscaping
* Comprehensive Street Maintenance Program
* Utility Underground Park La Quinta
* Landscape Improvements Eisenhower: Avenida 50/Coachella
* Senior Center Parking Lot Improvements
* Washington Street/Highway 111 Interim Improvements
* Traffic Signal Jefferson Street/Fred Waring
* Coachella Drive Drainage Improvements
Carryover Prolect
* Fritz Burns Pool
The 1 996/97 Fiscal Year CIP identifies $4,595,930 in improvements. Overall, the
City is proposing approximately $13,677,550 in projects over the next five 5) years.
The remaining projects represent deferred projects having a total cost of
$16,100,312. The total funding of deferred projects listed will require future City
Council action to ensure revenue availability. The following assumptions should be
taken into account when reviewing the CIP.
* The City Council has reaffirmed prior policy to maintain sufficient
General Fund emergency reserves, a General Fund reserve for cash flow
purposes, and allocation of sufficient funds to cover current contracted
and authorized capital improvement projects.
000273
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 * Currently, David M. Griffith DMG) is finalizing a Development Impact
Fee Study that addresses impact fees for community facilities required
to serve future development in the City. The Study has identified
additional community infrastructure required to support growth and the
estimated cost, and the level of fees required to fund the completion of
those projects.
The DMG Study is scheduled to be presented to the City Council prior
to the end of the fiscal year. The recommendations from this Study,
subject to City Council approval, may impact the level of the
Infrastructure Fund available for future capital improvement projects.
Recommendations may also restrict the type of capital improvement
projects that could be funded by the Infrastructure Fund.
* Specific projects have been identified to be funded by the
Redevelopment Agency's Low/Moderate Income Housing Fund. Staff
has made preliminary findings that these capital improvements may
support the development of low/moderate income housing projects.
Further staff analysis will be required to ensure that adequate
evaluations are made as to the appropriate use of low/moderate income
housing funds for these projects.
* Certain future projects will require the creation of Assessment districts
to provide funding resources. The lack of assessment district
authorization could further defer these projects unless alternative
sources of revenue can be secured, or unless project priorities are
changed to defer other improvements.
* Because of increases in ongoing maintenance costs and the addition of
completed improvements, the Lighting and Landscape District may need
to increase assessments in the future. The current fund balance and
annual assessment revenues are inadequate to cover all future capital
and operational cost increases. The alternative would be to continue to
defer specific lighting and landscape improvements and/or reduce
existing landscape maintenance activities until such time that other
revenue sources are available.
It is the intent of the City staff to conduct a short presentation regarding the
components and implications of the plan and be available for questions of the City
Council as discussion occurs.
I
w
David M. s er:
Public Works Director/City Engineer 000279
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS:
HUMAN SERVICES COMMISSION
SPECIAL MEETING
MINUTES
MARCH 6,1996
I. CALLTOORDER
A special meeting of the Human Services Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the La
Quinta Civic Center West Conference Room. Chairperson Irwin presided. The Pledge of
Allegiance was given.
ROLL CALL:
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairperson Barbara Irwin
Vice Chairperson Kate Kelly
Commissioner Norris Bernard
Commissioner Jessie Ann Chesnut
Commissioner Victoria St. Johns
Commissioner Kay Wolff
Commissioner Joan Rebich
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: Tom Hanung, Building & Safety Director
Diane Aaker, Senior Secretary
II. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
Ill. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On motion of Commissioner Bernard, seconded by Commissioner St. Johns, and carried
unanimously, the minutes of February 21,1996 were approved.
IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS
Joan Rebich, recently appointed Commissioner, was welcomed to the Human Services
Commission.
Chairperson Irwin reported that the draft of the Human Services Commission minutes of February
21 were the first to be submitted for Council's information.
hscmin36
1 000282
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140! NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140" NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140# NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140$ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140% NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140& NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140' NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140( NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140) NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140* NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140+ REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL IThMS:
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
MINUTES
February 12, 1996
I. CALLTOORDER
A regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the La Quinta Civic
Center Study Session Room. Commissioner Mullen was appointed by the Commission to preside over the meeting
due to the absence of the Chairperson and Vice Chairperson. Pledge of Allegiance was led by Commissioner Brenneis.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioner Dawn Brenneis
Commissioner Carl Ingram
Commissioner Stacey Mullen
Commissioner Kathryn Pedersen
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Lawrence Best Vice Chairperson)
Commissioner Mike Davis
Commissioner B.J. Seaton Chairperson)
STAFF PRESENT: Marty Nicholson, Parks & Recreation Director
Cristal Spidell, Secretary
Dave Cosper, Public Works Director
John Freeland, Sr. Engineer
Fred Baker, Associate Planner
It was moved by Commissioner Ingram/Brenneis to excuse Chairperson Seaton and Vice Chairperson Best from
tonight's meeting due to illness. Unanimous.
It was moved by Commissioner Ingram/Brenneis to excuse Commissioner Davis from tonight's meeting because he
is out of town. Unanimous.
II. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA
Marty Nicholson, Parks and Recreation Director requested to move IX. Commission Business, Item B. Urban
Forestry Grant Program afler VII. Correspondence and Written Materials due to stafl availability.
It was moved by Commissioner Ingram/Brenneis to move IX. Commission Business, Item B. Urban Forestry Grant
Program after VII. Correspondence and Written Materials. Unanimous.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was moved by Commissioner Ingram/Brenneis to APPROVE the Minutes of January 8,1996 as submitted.
Unanimous.
IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS None
000299
PRCMIN.016 1
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140, NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140- NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140. NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140/ DEPARTMENT REPORTS: AA
o???
0
MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Mark Weiss, Assistant City Manager
DATE: April 2,1996
RE: Franchise Negotiations Status Report Waste Management
Pursuant to Council request, following is a status report on franchise negotiations with
Waste Management.
The City of La Quinta, anticipating franchise negotiations, allocated $25,000 for waste
contract negotiations" consulting services in its Fiscal Year 1995196 Advanced Planning
Division budget. Community Development staff consulted with the City Attorney in October
of 1995 regarding the existing franchise agreement with Waste Management of the Desert
for a determination on the City's flexibility to bid or re-negotiate for waste services.
Subsequent to a legal determination that, pursuant to its existing franchise agreement, the
City must negotiate with Waste Management in good faith, staff obtained copies of recently
negotiated waste contracts in Palm Desert and Rancho Mirage, and contacted Cathedral
City to determine the status of its waste franchise.
Staff determined in its investigation that Rancho Mirage and Cathedral City had retained
EcoNomics for technical support in their negotiations with Waste Management. Staff
solicited a proposal from EcoNomics and, after conferring with the City Attorney regarding
both the proposal and negotiations schedule, retained EcoNomics for technical support
on a time and materials as-needed" basis at a cost not to exceed $7,120. Staff contacted
Waste Management and, 1) requested a brief submission outlining that company's key
issues, and 2) advised them of the City's tentative schedule and approach in conducting
negotiations. Staff advised the Council on March 19 of potential issues and EcoNomics'
retention.
On Tuesday, March 26,1996, City staff including the City Manager, City Attorney,
Assistant City Manager and Community Development Director) met with Cerene St. John
of EcoNomics and reviewed key issues, the Rancho Mirage agreement and alternative
options available to the City for proceeding with these contract negotiations. It was
determined in this meeting that, while the Rancho Mirage agreement provided an excellent
starting point for negotiations, substantive modifications may be advisable to tailor the
agreement to the City of La Quinta and take advantage of known developments
subsequent to Rancho Mirage's negotiations regarding tipping and administrative fees.
OOP3f)3
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1400 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1401 DEPARTMENT REPORTS: A-?
7Q.?AA?I')f?
rOF? MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
DATE. April 2, 1996
RE: Department Report Responses to Public Comment
Following are responses to public comment from the City Council Meeting of March
19, 1996:
Lucia Moran advised that she was present to thank the Council for their support of
the Soap Box Derby
* No response was necessary.
Donna Martin, Community Concert Association, advised that she was present to
thank the Council for their support and to invite the City Council to the next
Community Concert scheduled for March 31, 1 996
* No response was necessary.
Wally Reynolds regarding the golf cart lane along Jefferson Street
* Dave Cosper, Public Works Director, has been informed that he will be
invited to the next Westward Ho Homeowners Association meeting, at
which time this issue will be discussed. At the conclusion of this
meeting, a Council report will be prepared in order to incorporate the
noted discussion.
000305
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1402 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1403 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1404m\cl??
0
I'OF? MEMORANDUM
TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council
FROM: Thomas P. Genovese, City Manager
DATE: March 28, 1 996
RE: Report of Palm Springs Regional Airport Commission
Tom Freeman
Attached is a report from Tom Freeman, the City's representative for the
Palm Springs Regional Airport Commission. Tom Freeman has expressed
an interest in providing the City Council with a report on a quarterly
basis regarding the Commission's activities.
Mr. Freeman will present the attached information at the City Council
meeting and be available for questions.
TPG:pjs
OOO3O?
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1405 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1406 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1407 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1408 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 1409 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140: NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140; NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140< AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCILIRDA MEETING DATE: CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIThE: April 2, 1996 STUDY SESSION:
PUBLIC HEARING:
Public Hearing on General Plan Amendment 95-051 and
Environmental Assessment 96-312, a request to amend the
City's Land Use Map of the General Plan to remove the Rural
Residential Overlay from properties approximately 615 acres)
that are designated Low Density Residential LDR) generally
located on the south side of 52nd Avenue, east of Jefferson
Street, and north of 55th Avenue. Applicants: Dwight Stuart,
Wally Friend, and City of La Quinta
RECOMMENDATION:
As recommended by the Planning Commission, adopt City Council Resolutions certifiing the
Negative Declaration nvironmental Assessment 96-312) and approving General Plan Amendment
95-051, removing the Rural Residential Overlay from properties approximately 615 acres) presently
designated Low Density Residential LDR) that are on the south side of 52nd Avenue, east of
Jefferson Street, and north of 55th Avenue.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
SiteBackground
The 1992 General Plan Update established the Rural Residential Overlay on 1,620 acres designated
on the General Plan Map as Very Low or Low Density Residential Attachment 1). The General Plan
Land Use Element goal of this Overlay District is to facilitate the preservation and development of
a rural character in desirable locations in the City." To carry out this goal, the Overlay reduces the
density by one unit per acre in each land use designation and requires design standards reinforcing
the rural theme. Before the implementation of the RRO density requirements, subdivisions were
approved with an underlying density of 24 dulac. for Low Density Residential LDR) and 0-2 du./ac.
for Very Low Density Residential VLDR). The two property owners initiating the General Plan
Srptcc.55-disk
000316
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140=Amendment request are Mr. Dwight Stuart and Mr. Wally Friend who have property generally
located north of 53rd Avenue between Jefferson Street and Madison Street. A list of the property
owners involved in this request are shown on Attachment 2. Additionally, staff has prepared
composite maps of the properties generally north of 54th Avenue that make up 94% of the land
holdings excluding the Elliot/Poliak property east of PGA West Attachments 3A and 3B Property
Ownership Exhibits, Attachments 4A and 4B Land Use Exhibits).
Surrounding Zoning/Land Use Development
Surrounding Zoning Land Use
North: R-1 20,000/R-2 Vacant, Single Family Homes, Nurseries, I'D
Sub station, and County of Riverside
South: CPS/R-2 PGA Resort and Fire Station 70
East: R-l 20,000 Single Family Homes, Pastures, Vacant
West: R-2/CPS Vacant Oak Tree Specific Plan East of Jefferson
Street), Vacant, Single Family
Note: Information based on properties north of 54th Avenue.
Applicant Request
On December 20, 1995, staff received requests from Mr. Dwight Stuart and Mr. Wally Friend to
amend the City's Land Use Element of the General Plan removing the Rural Residential Overlay
RRO) from their properties. Both property owners feel that the City's adoption of the 1992 General
Plan adversely impacts their approved development plans for two reasons. The first reason is that
their parcels are designated for Low Density Residential development, 2-4 dwellings per acre thirty-
eight acres of Mr. Stuart's property, east of Madison Street, is designated as Very Low Density
Residential), and if the Rural Residential Overlay provisions are applied it reduces their site density
to three units per acre or one unit per acre for a portion of Mr. Stuart's property in the VLDR
classification. Secondly, the General Plan Policies require Rural Residential design standards such
as enhanced setbacks, rural fencing solid block walls are prohibited), and architectural styles of
buildings emphasizing the rural theme.
The applicants' properties are approved for traditional single family housing, according to the R-l
development standards and the Subdivision Ordinance. Typically, the minimum lot size in the R-l
District is 7,200 square feet or larger. However, the approved projects average 9,000 square feet or
larger. Therefore, requiring 40-foot front yard setbacks for these average sized lots will not achieve
the characteristics typical of a rural residential neighborhood Attachment 5).
Planning Commission Review
On February 27, 1996, the Plannihg Commission held a public hearing on the project. No one spoke
against the request to eliminate the RRO District from those properties that are de0sign0a0te3d1L?
srptcc 55-disk
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140>Density Residential 2-4 dwelling units/acre), generally located south of 52nd Avenue. The
Commission, on a 7-0 vote, recommended approval of the land use change and Environmental
Assessment by their adoption of Resolutions 96-007 and 96-008. A copy of the minutes is attached
Attachment 6).
Public Notices
Staff placed an 1/8 page ad in the Desert Sun newspaper on February 5, 1996, and March 11, 1996,
notif?ing the community of the hearing dates for the Commission and Council. Staff also mailed the
public notice to all property owners affected by the request or, within. 300-feet of the affected area
as required. To date, no negative written comments from adjacent residents have been received.
Environmental Assessment
An Environmental Assessment was prepared to analyze the effects of this proposal under current
standards and guidelines. Attached for your review and consideration is the Environmental Checklist
accompanied by staffs explanations for the noted responses. Based on the completed environmental
analysis, the Commission has recommended certification of a Negative Declaration for the project
Attachment 7).
STATEMENTS OF THE ISSUES:
Issuel Ru?ral Characteristics
The removal of the RR Overlay ftom all properties designated on the existing General Plan Map as
Low Density Residential LDR) is warranted because the LDR designation is intended to allow more
urban development, such as that which is occurring in North La Quinta i.e., 7,200 sq. ft. or larger
lots). The RRO district is appropriate for the Very Low Density Residential designated areas because
the lots are greater than 0.3 acres i.e., 14,000 sq. ft.) in size as required by the zoning e.g., R-1
14,000 or R-1 20,000). The rural characteristics of large lots, generous setbacks, open space and low
density are better suited for these size lots.
Issue2 Removal of the RRO density requirements
The proposed removal of the Rural Residential Overlay from all Low Density Residential, 615 acres,
amounts to an increase of 615 units. However, as exemplified by the two applicants' subdivisions,
the approved densities exceed the density requirements of the RRO by only 35 units over a 309-acre
area. This suggests that the remainder of the Low Density Residential area will not develop to the
high end of the density range. Allowing an increase to the density will not be significant because the
general existing conditions of the area will not substantially change due to existing development
approvals and land uses.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
1. As recommended by the Planning Commission, adopt City Council Resolution certif?ring the
Negative Declaration of Environmental Imp act EA. 96-312) according to the findings set
forth in the attached Resolution; and, 000318
Srptcc.55-di?k
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140? 2. As recommended by the Planning Commission, adopt City Council Resolution approving
General Plan Amendment 95-05 and the removal of the Rural Residential Overlay
designation trom various properties in the Low Density Residential LDR) land use
classification on the Land Use Policy Diagram per Exhibit A"; or,
3. Continue discussion on this case to April 16, 1996; or,
4. Modi? the Rural Residential Overlay boundaries; or,
5. Deny the application as submitted.
J erman, ommunity Development Director
1. General Plan Map
2. Property Ownership List
3. Property Ownership Maps A and B)
4. Land Use Maps A and B)
5. General Plan Policy 2-1.2.3, Rural Residential Design Guidelines
6. Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt)
7. Environmental Documents
s?ptcc.55-di?k
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140@ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140A NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140B NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140C NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140D NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140E NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140F NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140G NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140H NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140I NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140J NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140K NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140L NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140M NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140N NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140O NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140P NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140Q NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140R NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140S NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140T NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140U NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140V NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140W NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140X NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140Y NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140Z NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140[ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140\ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140] NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140^ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140_ NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140` NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140a NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140b NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140c NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140d NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140e NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140f NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140g NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140h NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140i NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140j NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140k NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140l NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140m NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140n NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140o NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140p NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140q NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140r NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140s NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140t NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140u C
1
AGENDA CATEGORY:
G?40f??O?
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCIL?DA MEETING DATE: CONSENT CALENDAR:
April 2, 1996
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Public Hearing on Conditional Use Permit 96-023, Plot Plan PUBLIC HFARING: z
96-571 and Environmental Assessment 96-311, a request to
develop 11.65 acres with a 11 6-unit affordable apartment
complex on the west side of Washington Street, 700-feet
north of Calle Tampico. Applicant: Keith International, Inc.
For USA Properties)
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Resolutions concurring with the Planning Commission's approval and certification of the
Mitigated Negative Declaration nvronmental Assessment 96-311), Conditional Use Permit 96-023
and Plot Plan 96-571 to allow the 116-unit affordable apartment complex, subject to environmental
monitoring and conditions.
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
None.
BACKGROUND AND OVERVIEW:
Presently the site is vacant and located on the west side of Washington Street, approximately 700-feet
north of Calle Tampico. The 11.6 acre site has 560 feet of frontage on Washington Street. Access
to the site is from an existing shared driveway with the La Quinta Village Shopping Center to the
south Attachrnents 1 and 2).
Initial Development Request
The Planning Commission denied the applicant's request to develop a 128-unit apartment complex
at this site on October 24, 1995, under Conditional Use Permit 95-021 and Plot Plan 95-564
Attachinent 3).
On appeal, in December 1995, the City Council reviewed the developer's initial proposal of 128
affordable apartment units. The Council sent the proposal back to the Commission to reconsider the
applicant's request because the developer had revised the site layout after the Commission's denial
rpccu?-a
OOfl3?3
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140vof the project Attachment 4 Minutes). The revised site plan reorganizes the buildings by placing
them away from Washington Street and incorporating open space areas 2.8+ acres) along the east
side of the site, abutting Washington Street. Seventeen apartment buildings are shown with most
buildings being two-stories In overall height except for Building Numbers 2, 6, 8 and 9. Please note
that the plan information is incorrect because the building numbers start with Building #2 instead of
Building #1.) The apartment buildings are placed 20-feet away from the west property line even
though the Zoning Code allows 10-feet. The recreation building with pool/spa is situated between
Building Numbers 13, 14, 17 and 18.
Planning Commission Action
On February 13, 1996, the Planning Commission held a public hearing and approved the revised 116-
unit affordable housing project Attachment 5). The Planning Commission Report and Environmental
Assessment are attached Attachments 6 and 7). The Planning Commission, by adoption of
Resolution 96-004 Attachment 8), certified the Mitigated Negative Declaration EA. 96-311) and
approved the Conditional Use Permit and Plot Plan applications by adoption of Resolution 96-005
Attachment 9), subject to Conditions as amended. A copy of the Planning Commission Minutes is
attached Attachment 10). Condition 68 was modified by the Commission to require the developer
to subinit the design plan of the carports and add enclosed storage facilities i.e., garages, etc.). If
parking spaces are lost constructing the storage enclosures, the developer is required to provide new
parking spaces on a one-to-one basis plus an additional ten parking spaces within the project.
Council Review
On March 5, 1996, the City Council, on a 3-0 vote Councilman Adolph abstained), exercised their
authority to request a public hearing to review the Planning Commission's February 13, 1996, action
to permit development of the Villa La Quinta Apartments, a 1 16-unit affordable apartment complex.
Public Hearing Notice
Staff has mailed public hearing notices to the surrounding property owners and an advertisement was
placed in the Desert Sun newspaper on March 11, 1996, that a public hearing will be held on April
2, 1996.
CONCLUSION:
The City Council received the applicant's plans and studies for this project in March. Therefore, this
material is not attached to the Council's packet of material. No new information has been received
since the Council's March 5, 1996 meeting.
trpccus4-a
OO()374
2
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140wFINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
1. Adopt Resolutions concurring with the Planning Commission's approval and certification of
the Mitigated Negative Declaration Environmental Assessment 96-311), Conditional Use
Permit 96-023 and Plot Plan 96-571 to allow the 1 16-unit affordable apartment complex,
subject to the environmental mitigation measures and conditions of approval; or,
2. Modif?? the Conditions of Approval; or,
3. Continue discussion on the development request to April 16, 1996; or,
4. Adopt Resolutions denying the development proposal based on Findings.
ttachnients
1. Vicinity Map
2. Surrounding Development Map
3. Previous Site Plan 128 units
4. City Council Minutes December 19, 1995)
5. Siteplan- 116 units
6. Planning Commission Report February 13, 1996)
7. Environmental Assessment
8. Resolution 96-004
9. Resolution 96-005
10. Planning Commission Minutes Excerpt)
strpccus4-a
3
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140x NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140y NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140z NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 z
4-
AGENDA CATEGORY:
BUSINESS SESSION:
COUNCIL/RDA MEETING DATE: April 2, 1996 CONSENT CALENDAR:
ITEM TIThE: STUDY SESSION:
Consideration of a Resolution of Necessity PUBLIC HEARING:
for Acquisition of Portions of Property Located
at the Northwest Corner of State Highway 111
and Washington Street, for Roadway Expansion
and Drainage Facility Purposes
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the Resolution of Necessity authorizing initiation of proceedings in eminent
domain to acquire various property interests in property located at the northwest
corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street in the City. Acquisition of these
property interests is a necessary accommodation of the State Highway 111 Roadway
Expansion Project, and the construction of various stormwater drainage facilities.)
FISCAL IMPLICATIONS:
The appraised fair-market value for right-of-way needed from the property located
at the northwest corner of Highway 111 and Washington Street, as determined by
Realco Consultants, and outlined in their October 30, 1995 Professional Appraisal
Report, is $73,354.10. Acquiring the necessary right-of-way through eminent domain
actions requires the City to deposit this amount in an escrow account of the Riverside
County Superior Court prior to any action taking place. Their are adequate funds in
the Washington Street Widening Project Fund Account 401-609-695) to fund these
costs.
BACKGROUND:
As City Council is aware, the City has long been planning implementation of an
improvement to State Highway 111, to expand the roadway to its ultimate width.
The circulation element of the City's General Plan calls for the widening of Highway
111 which will be accommodated by this Project.
In addition, the Project includes construction of a stormwater drainage facility which
will connect upstream drainage areas with the currently existing Coachella Valley
Water District storm channel, which lies to the north of the property. Construction
of this drainage facility will serve to improve the stormwater drainage in the area
generally, and will eliminate various ponding and other drainage difficulties which are
currently experienced along Washington Street and Highway 111.
OOO46??
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140The record owners of the property are Dr. and Mrs. Peter Tynberg, along with a
number of other persons whom Dr. and Mrs. Tynberg have indicated to the City they
represent.
The property interests staff is recommending the CiW Council authorize for acquisition
by eminent domain include approximately 30,139 square feet of frontage on State
Highway 111, and a small portion along Washington Street, to be acquired in fee.
It also consists of a perpetual, nonexclusive easement for underground drainage
facilities along the easterly boundary of the property, adjacent to Washington Street,
consisting of approximately 9,476 square feet. Finally, the property interests include
a temporary construction easement on two 2) different parcels, totaling 32,689
square feet. The temporary construction easements are for the accommodation of
various construction activities, and will span from the time when the City issues a
Notice to Proceed to its contractor, until the day a Notice of Completion is filed, but
in no event longer than 365 total days. Attachment 1 outlines the locations of the
various acquistions.
The City commissioned a professional real estate appraisal of all the property interests
to be acquired, and the full appraised amount was offered to the owners of record by
way of a letter dated February 7, 1 996. A follow-up letter was sent on February 27,
1996, and staff has had at least one meeting and a number of telephonic
communications with the representatives of the property owners since then. Despite
these attempts, there has been no significant progress toward negotiated acquisition
of the property, and staff, therefore, recommends the City Council consider initiating
eminent domain proceedings.
Passage of a Resolution of Necessity is a legal prerequisite to the initiation of any
legal action in eminent domain. Under Code of Civil Procedure 1245.230, the
resolution must contain four 4) findings. These are:
1. The public interest and necessity required the proposed project.
2. The proposed project is planned or located in the manner that will be
most compatible with the greatest public good and least private injury.
3. The property described in the resolution is necessary for the proposed
project.
4. The offer required by Government Code 7267.2 has been made to the
owners of record.
The factual basis upon which City Council may make each of the required findings are
listed in the proposed resolution. Staff may present additional factual grounds on
these showings as may be required at the hearing.
The representatives of the owners of record have been given mailed notice of the
impending hearing not less than fifteen 15) days in advance of the date of the
hearing and have not indicated their interest in being heard before City
f:\pwd?pt\counciI\96comtgs\96O4O2\96O2O4b.wpd
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140connection with this proceeding. A true and correct copy of the notice provided is
on file with the City Clerk for review.
FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES:
Beginning eminent domain proceedings on the acquisition of this right-of-way at this
time assures the City that the right-of-way will be available for the estimated start of
construction date of August, 1996. The City will gain access of the right-of-way
within approximately 60 days of this hearing, leaving only the issue of the final cost
of the right-of-way to be determined at a later date.
The following alternatives are available to the City Council:
1. Adopt the Resolution of Necessity and begin the eminent domain actions to
acquire the property. The action assures the City that the right-of-way will be
available for the estimated start of construction date of August 1996.
2. Direct staff to negotiate a settlement with the property owner. To date, staff
has had very little success in reducing the property owner's asking price for
the right-of-way. Staff does not have any reason to believe that a successful
agreement will be developed unless the City is willing to pay a significant
higher price than what the right-of-way has been appraised for. Finally,
additional negotiations may require the estimated start of construction time be
delayed until well after August 1996.
3 Pr I dditional direction to City staff.
David M. C per
Public Work iyect riCity Engineer
000471
f:\pwdept\oouncil\9 6oomtQs\960402\960204b wpd
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02
ing -> 140 NOTEXTPAGE
BIB]
06-30-1999-U01
02:40:53PM-U01
ADMIN-U01
CC-U02
04-U02
02-U02
1996-U02