Loading...
1994 01 18 CCT4,Yl 4 4Q" city council JgenJa CITY COUNCEL CEIAMBER 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Regular Meeting January 18, 1994 - 3:00 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Beginning Res. No. 94-1 a. Pledge of Allegiance Ord, No. 241 b. Roll Call CONFutMATION OF AGENDA APPROVAL OF bIINIPPES a. Approval of Minutes of November 30, 1993, December 21, 1993 and January 4, 1994 ANNOUNCEMENTS PRESENTATIONS PUBLIC CO IIMU NT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for a public hearing. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. WRIITF.N Colzlam ONDENCE A. LETTER FROM CITY OF PALM DESERT ENCOURAGING THE COUNCIL TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION'S CHALLENGE TO CALEXICO EAST BORDER CROSSING AND NEW STATE ROUTE 7 PROJECT. II. LETTER FROM CITY OF INDIAN WELLS TRANSMITTING A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE IMMEDIATE SEARCH FOR A NEW CVAG EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR. BUSINESS SESSION CONSIDERATION OF STREET NAME CHANGE 93-004 FROM VIA SOUD TO VIA AVANTE, LOCATED SOUTH OF 47TH AVENUE, AND EAST OF CALEO BAY WITHIN LAKE LA QUINTA. APPLICANTS: LAKE LA QUINTA, WILMA LA QUINTA & LANDREX. A) RESOLUTION ACTION. 2. CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICE FOR THE 1994 LA QUINTA ARTS FESTIVAL (SAD 93-034). APPLICANT: LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 3. CONSIDERATION OF ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMITTEE REQUEST TO SPEND APP FUNDS TO HELP INCORPORATE ART WITHIN THE FRITZ BURNS PARK. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 4. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 2.29, PLANNING COMMISSION, LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE AND DELETING ALL CODE SECTIONS REFERING TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD. A) MOTION TO TAKE UP ORDINANCE NO. BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING. B) MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. ON FIRST READING. 5. CONSIDERATION OF SHORT -LISTING POTENTIAL SITES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MATERIAL -RECOVERY FACILITY TO SERVE THE EAST COUNTY. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 6. CONSIDERATION OF TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURES ON PARK AVENUE SOUTH OF AVENUE 50 AND ON CALLE TAMPICO EAST OF WASHINGTON STREET. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 7. CONSIDERATION OF CITY ASSISTANCE TO COACHELLA VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 8. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PARKS AND WILDLIFE BOND ACT OF 1994. A) RESOLUTION ACTION. 002 Page 2 9. CONSIDERATION OF MANAGEMENT OF PROPOSED CITY OF LA QUINTA BOXING PROGRAM. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 10. CONSIDERATION OF FACILITY USE FOR LA QUINTA ARTS LEAGUE'S ANNUAL HOME TOUR AND WAIVER OF APPLICABLE FEES. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 11. CONSIDERATION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 12. CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION AMENDING THE COPY FEE. A) RESOLUTION ACTION. 13. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FROM COACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH, INC. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION, 14. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO.3 FOR WHITEWATER/WASHINGTON STREET BRIDGE - REVISION OF CHANNEL LINING. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 15. APPROVAL OF CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER 92-1-02 FOR INSTALLATION OF CURB AND GUTTER WITHIN PHASE V IMPROVEMENTS. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION. 16. TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT DATED NOVEMBER 30, 1993. A) MINUTE ORDER ACTION. CONSENT CALENDAR Note: Consent Calendar Items are considered to be routine in nature and will be approved by one motion. 1. APPROVAL OF DEMAND REGISTER DATED JANUARY 4, 1994 & JANUARY 18, 1994. 2. APPROVAL OF CHANGE TO TRAVEL AND EXPENSE POLICY TO ALLOW FOR CITY MANAGER APPROVAL OF TRAVEL WHEN TIMING DOES NOT ALLOW FOR COUNCIL REVIEW. Page 0U3 3. APPROVALOF TEMPORARY NO -PARKING ZONES AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROLS FOR THE BOB HOPE CHRYSLER CLASSIC GOLF TOURNAMENT. (RES) 4. APPROVAL OF QUITCLAIM DEED FOR TEMPORARY ACCESS EASEMENT ON TRACT 25389 - DUNA LA QUINTA. 5. ACCEPTANCE OF RIGHT-OF-WAY PARCELS FOR CALLE TAMPICO CUL-DE-SACS. 6. ACCEPTANCE OF THE LA QUINTA EMPLOYEE'S ASSOCIATION'S DONATION OF A WEIGHT MACHINE AND TREADMILL. (RES) 7. RECEIVE AND FILE THE ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT FOR THE LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY. 8. RECEIVE AND FILE THE ANNUAL AUDIT REPORT FOR THE CITY OF LA QUINTA. 9. APPROVAL OF FIRST AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT FOR THE SENIOR CENTER (EXTENSION OF CURRENT LEASE) WITH MARUKO, INC. 10. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION APPROVINGA MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION COMMENCING ON JULY 1, 1993 AND TERMINATING ON JUNE 30, 1994. 11. ADOPTION OF RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT THE TERMS APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. _APPLY TO ALL CITY EMPLOYEES COMMENCING ON JULY 1, 1993 AND TERMINATING ON JUNE 30, 1994. 12. APPROVAL OF EXTENSION OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PARC LA QUINTA. INTERVIEWS OF APPLICANTS FOR VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD. 2. DISCUSSION OF MOBILE HOME RENT CONTROL REGULATIONS. REPORTS AND INFORMATIONAL ITEMS A. PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 30, DECEMBER 14 & DECEMBER 28, 1993 B. ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMITTEE MINUTES OF DECEMBER 6, 1993 C. DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MINUTES OF DECEMBER 1, 1993 D. COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 22, 1993 E. INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 10, 1993 F. CVAG COMMITTEE REPORTS G. SUNLINE REPORTS H. C.V. MOUNTAINS CONSERVANCY Page 4 004 A. CITY MANAGER B. CITY ATTORNEY - NONE C. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES DIRECTOR - NONE D. BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR - NONE E. FINANCE DIRECTOR A. TRANSMITTAL OF THE CITY'S NOVEMBER 30, 1993 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION B. TRANSMITTAL OF THE FINANCING AUTHORITY'S NOVEMBER 30, 1993 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION F. PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR G. PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR - NONE H. PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR - NONE I. SHERIFF'S STATION COMMANDER - NONE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBERS' ITEMS 1. DISCUSSION OF LIGHTING THROUGHOUT THE CITY FOR DECORATIVE/SAFETY PURPOSES. (PENA). 2. CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTION OF A RESOLUTION TO BE FORWARDED TO DESERT SANDS UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT STATING THE CITY COUNCIL'S POSITION THAT STUDENTS RESIDING WITHIN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA SHALL HAVE FIRST PRIORITY FOR ATTENDANCE AT THE LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL. (MCCARTNEY) RECESS TO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING RECESS UNTIL 7:00 P.M. PUBLIC CONEWENT This is the time set aside for public comment on any matter not scheduled for a public hearing. Please complete a "request to speak" form and limit your comments to three minutes. Please watch the timing device on the podium. PRESENTATION OF LA QUINTA BEAUTIFUL AWARDS FOR DECEMBER. * Mr. & Mrs. Ronald Yanez, 78-825 Villeta Drive - Most Beautifully Decorated Outdoor Christmas Tree * Mr. Donald Stone, 51-360 Avenida Vallejo - Most Creative Use of Natural Materials * Mr. & Mrs. Scott Sharp, 54-511 Avenida Juarez - Most Creative Use of Lights * Mr. & Mrs. Mike Hardin, 79-755 Fiesta Dr. - Most Beautiful Nativity Scene * Mr. & Mrs. Gary Brennen, 46-324 Roudel Lane - Most Holiday Spirit Page 5 Ql , CC .1 PURLIC HEARINGS WEED ABATEMENTS/LOT CLEANINGS AND PLACEMENT OF COSTS ON THE 1994/95 TAX ROLLS: A. HARBUCK, CARL APN 769-084-004 $187.50 B. GLAZER, SIMON APN 773-123-004 $197.50 C. ADAMS, MARION APN 774-153-015 $187.50 D. FISCHER, MICHAEL APN 646-311-015 $187.50 E. FISCHER, MICHAEL APN 646-311-016 $187.50 F. CAPITOL CONSTRUCTION APN 646-311-003 $187.50 G. BETTERLEY, WM. A. APN 646-312-020 $187.50 H. KIRK, KAREN APN 646-313-007 $187.50 I. MILLER, M. M. APN 646-313-014 $187.50 J. SWEET, DOROTHY E. APN 646-312-037 $187.50 K. YARU, THOMAS C. APN 646-313-005 $187.50 L. YARU, THOMAS C. APN 646-313-006 $187.50 M. LA QUINTA ASSOC. APN 604-251-001 $187.50 N. LA QUINTA ASSOC. APN 604-251-002 $187.50 0. LA QUINTA ASSOC. APN 604-251-003 $187.50 P. LA QUINTA ASSOC. APN 604-251-004 $187.50 Q. LA QUINTA ASSOC. APN 604-252-006 $187.50 R. LA QUINTA ASSOC. APN 604-252-012 $187.50 S. LA QUINTA ASSOC. APN 604-252-013 $187.50 T. LA QUINTA ASSOC, APN 604-252-024 $187.50 U. LA QUINTA ASSOC. APN 604-252-025 $187.50 V. LA QUINTA ASSOC. APN 604-252-026 $187.50 W. LA QUINTA ASSOC. APN 604-252-027 $187.50 A) RESOLUTION ACTION. 2. CONSIDERATION OF TENTATIVE TRACT 27835 FOR APPROVAL OF SEVEN RESIDENTIAL AIR SPACE CONDOMINIUM LOTS, RACQUET CLUB LOT & MISCELLANEOUS LOTS ON 36± GROSS ACRES, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 48TH AVENUE, WEST OF DUNE PALMS ROAD (EXTENDED) WITHIN RANCHO LA QUINTA. APPLICANT: TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT (CHARLES R. STROTHER). A) RESOLUTION ACTION. 3. ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT #93-039 - AMENDMENT TO TITLE 9, PLANNING AND ZONING OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING INTERIM HOUSE SIZE, AND COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS WITHIN RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS. APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA. A) MOTION TO TAKE UP ORDINANCE NO. BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING. B) MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. ON FIRST READING. Page 6 006 4. AMENDMENT TO MUNICIPAL CODE TITLE 12.54 REGARDING TRUCK ROUTES AND RESTRICTED ROUTES ON CITY STREETS. A) MOTION TO TAKE UP ORDINANCE NO. BY TITLE AND NUMBER ONLY AND WAIVE FURTHER READING. B) MOTION TO INTRODUCE ORDINANCE NO. ON FIRST READING. CLOSED SESSION 1. DISCUSSION OF ON -GOING LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 A. MIKE HUDSON VS CITY OF LA QUINTA CASE NO. I-68259 B. PREMEW BANK - CASE NO. 71942 2. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL LITIGATION PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9 A. DESERT GARDENS CUP 93-009 3. DISCUSSION OF NEGOTIATIONS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.8 - A. MIKE HOGAN'S PROPOSAL FOR COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT TO BE LOCATED ON THE BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB SITE - AVE. 50 AND PARK AVE. 4. DISCUSSION OF PERSONNEL PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957 A. EVALUATION PROCESS FOR COUNCIL -APPOINTED POSITIONS B. PERSONNEL SCHEDULING DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Saundra L. Juhola, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of January 18, 1994 was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce on Friday, January 14, 1994. DAT D: January 14, 1994 ANDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California Page 7 f} fl7 z Tay 4 OF LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL ADDENDUM TO AGENDA JANUARY 18, 1994 - 3:00 P.M. MAYOR AND COUNcEL MEI4IB wt MMS 3. CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST OF COACHELLA VALLEY ENTERPRISE ZONE AUTHORITY FOR SPONSORSHIP OF '1994 BUSINESS WEEK PRESIDENTS FORUM." (PENA) DECLARATION OF POSTING I, Saundra L. Juhola, City Clerk of the City of La Quints, California, hereby declare that the foregoing agenda for the City Council meeting of January 18, 1994 was posted on the outside entry to the Council Chamber, 78-495 Calle Tampico and on the bulletin board at the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce on Friday, January 14, 1994. Dat : January 14, 1994. UNDRA L. JUH City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 0119 City of Palm Desert REC"I'"ED 73-510 FRED WARING DRIVE, PALM DESFRT}J6�LIFORNU%2&"78 TELEPHONE (619) 346-0611 "' '= P,�X'JMII44640574 CI Y i;LERK December 30, 1993 Ms. Saundra Juhola, City Clerk City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Dear Saundra: At its regular meeting of December 9, 1993, the Palm Desert City Council unanimously adopted Resolution No. 93-105, supporting the Riverside County Transportation Commission's challenge to Calexico East Border Crossing and new State Route 7 project. The Council directed the City Clerk's Office to forward this resolution to all Coachella Valley cities, encouraging them to take similar action. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please let me know. Sincerely, lxill SHEILA R. GILLIGAN, CMC CITY CLERKIPUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER SRG : mpf 009 RESOLUTION NO. 93-105 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PALM DESERT, CALIFORNIA, SUPPORTING THE RIVERSIDE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION'S CHALLENGE TO CALEXICO EAST BORDER CROSSING AND NEW STATE ROUTE 7 PROJECT WHEREAS, on November 12, 1993, the Riverside County Transportation Commission ("RCTC") filed a complaint against the United States General Services Administration ("the GSA"), the California Department of Transportation ("Caltrans") , and the California Transportation Commission ( "the CTC") challenging the approval of a project known as the "Calexico East Border Station and State Route 7 Between the New Port of Entry and State Route 98" ("the Project") and the certification or approval of a Final Environmental Impact Statement/Environmental Impact Report ("EIS/EIR") for the Project; and WHEREAS, RCTC has alleged that approval of the Project by the GSA, Caltrans, and the CTC violated the National Environmental Policy Act and the California Environmental Quality Act because the EIS/EIR does not adequately consider the environmental impacts of the Project; and WHEREAS, RCTC has alleged that the EIS/EIR for the Project failed to consider a variety of Project impacts, including: 1) the impacts increased traffic, particularly commercial trucks, will have on an already unsafe and overtaxed State Route 86 within Riverside County; 2) the impacts increased mobile sources of pollutants (i.e., the increased number of vehicles) generated by the Project will have within Riverside and Imperial Counties; 3) the impacts increased traffic will have on Highway 111 within Riverside County; and 4) the impacts the extension of State Route 7 to Interstate 8 will have on the environment. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE as follows: 1. The City of Palm Desert supports the actions taken by RCTC in filing the complaint against the GSA, Caltrans, and the CTC to ensure that full and adequate environmental analysis of the Project and its impacts is conducted; and 2. The City of Palm Desert shares RCTC's concerns about the environmental impact of the Project and its impacts upon the citizens of Riverside County in general and the Coachella Valley in particular; and 3. The City of Palm Desert agrees with and supports RCTC's allegations regarding the effects of the Project upon the citizens of Riverside County in general and the Coachella Valley in particular; and 0A RESOLUTION NO. 93-105 PAGE 2 4. The City of Palm Desert encourages all cities within the Coachella Valley to adopt similar resolutions in support of the following: 1) the actions taken by RCTC in filing the complaint against the GSA, Caltrans, and the CTC regarding the Project; and 2) the allegations made by RCTC concerning the environmental impacts of the Project upon the citizens of Riverside County in general and the Coachella Valley in particular. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Palm Desert, California, this 9th day of December, 1993, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: CRITES, BELLY, SNYDER, WILSON NOES: NONE ABSENT: BENSON ABSTAIN: NONE TT ST: �.vcTr v -Tr .T.Tf1A* CITY OF PALM DESF*T, CALIFORNIA T" ff THE C I T y or 101AN WELLS A L I F O R N I A 44-950 Eldorado Drive Indian Wells CA 92210 7497 Tel. 619/346-2489 Fax: 619i 346-0407 RECEIVED `9`I JRN 4 PM 3 00 6IT1" CIF I -A QUINTA CITY CLERK December 30, 1993 City Council City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: RESOLUTION CALLING FOR THE IMMEDIATE SEARCH FOR A NEW CVAG EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Honorable Mayor and Council Members: At our December 16, 1993 meeting, the City Council of the City of Indian Wells adopted the attached Resolution No. 93-163 calling for the immediate search for a new CVAG Executive Director in light of Mr. Cleveland's impending retirement in June, 1994. We are requesting that this matter be agendized for a discussion in closed session at the January 28, 1994 CVAG Executive Committee meeting. Sincerely, James L. Killion Mayor c:\ W ps 1 Uattvarav apelaa.ed 012 RESOLUTION NO. 93-163 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF INDIAN WELLS, CALIFORNIA, CALLING FOR THE IMMEDIATE SEARCH FOR A NEW CVAG EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WHEREAS, the operation of the Coachella Valley Association of Governments ICVAGI is critical to each of its member cities; and, WHEREAS, the retirement of the Executive Director in June will create a lack of leadership unless recruitment plans are begun by the Executive Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Indian Wells DOES HEREBY RESOLVE that the CVAG Executive Committee is urged to adopt a plan for the recruitment and selection of a successor to the retiring Executive Director. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, this 16th day of December, 1993. JAMES L. KILLION MAYOR CERTIFICATION FOR RESOLUTION NO. 93-163 George J. Watts, City Clerk and ex-officio Clerk of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells, California, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that the whole number of the members of the City Council is five (5); that the above and foregoing Resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Indian Wells on the 16th day of December, 1993, by the following vote: AYES: Bostley, Killion, Leming, Slavens NOES: Arenstein ATTEST: i GEORGE J, WATTS CITY MANAGER/CITY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM: 79d4t��� fHN L. COOK ITY ATTORNEY 013 i X �z V OF COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: CONSIDERATION OF STREET NAME CHANGE 93- 004 FROM VIA SOUD TO VIA AVANTE LOCATED SOUTH OF 47TH AVENUE AND EAST OF CALEO BAY, WITHIN LAKE LA QUINTA APPLICANT: LAKE LA QUINTA, WILMA LA QUINTA, AND LANDREX CALIFORNIA SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING BUSINESS SESSION: I CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Landrex California is proposing to construct residential units within the Lake La Quinta development on Via Soud and surrounding streets. Because of the difficulty in pronouncing the street name and the fact that the yodel complex is proposed for this street, the applicants are requesting approval to change the name to Via Avante. Avante is the name of their project. The Planning Commission considered this request at its meeting of December 14, 1993, and unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Marrs absent) recommended approval. kTSCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. APPROVED BY: a i _ RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt City Council Resolution 94-_, approving Street Name Change 93-004, as recommended by the Planning Commission. Submitted by: 7FkRY HER1jvIAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR i J Approved for submission to city uOuncu: ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 014 TO: FROM: DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: CITY OF LA QUINTA MEMORANDUM HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR JANUARY 18, 1994 STREET NAME CHANGE 93-004 LAKE LA QUINTA, WILMA LA QUINTA, AND LANDREX CALIFORNIA CONSIDERATION OF STREET NAME CHANGE FROM VIA SOUD TO VIA AVANTE SOUTH OF 47FH AVENUE AND EAST OF CALEO BAY, WITHIN LAKE LA QUINTA ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION: STREET NAME CHANGES ARE EXEMPT FROM THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT REQUIREMENTS UNDER SECTION 15061. The subject street is vacant and housing adjacent to the street is proposed to be developed by Landrex California in the near future. In order to eliminate a difficult street name and allow the street name to coincide with the model complex location and project name, the applicant has requested this name change. BACKGROUND: Via Soud is a cul-de-sac road within the off -water unit area of Lake La Quints north of the lake. The streets are private, putting the responsibility of changing the street sign on the applicant. MEMOS s .19 2 1 015 ANALYSIS/FISCAL IMPACT: Planning Commission Review As required by Municipal Code regulations, this request has been reviewed by the Planning Commission at its meeting of December 14, 1993, and recommended for approval on a unanimous vote (4-0, Commissioner Marrs absent). RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt City Council Resolution 94 approving Street Name Change 93-004, as recommended by the Planning Commission, Attachments: 1. Street location map 2. Planning Commission staff report dated December 14, 1993 MEMOSS.192 2 016 RESOLUTION 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE APPLICATION TO CHANGE THE STREET NAME VIA SOUD TO VIA AVANTE. CASE NO.: STREET NAME CHANGE 93-004 LAKE LA QUINTA, WILMA LA QUINTA, AND LANDREX CALIFORINA WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 26th day of October, 1993, in accordance with Section 14.08.050 of the La Quinta Municipal Code state, at the request of Lake La Quinta, Wilma La Quinta, and Landrex California their intent to consider a change in the street name Via Soud to Via Avante in Lake La Quinta; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California at the same meeting did set December 14, 1993, as a public hearing date on the above matter, in accordance with Section 14.08.050 of the La Quinta Municipal Code; and, WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, did hold a public hearing on December 14, 1993, on Street Name Change 93-004 and recommended approval to the City Council; and, WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta did on January 18, 1994, consider the applicant's request and Planning Commission recommendation for Street Name Change 93-003; and, WHEREAS, said City Council at the meeting held on January 18, 1994, did find the following facts and reasons to approve Street Name Change 93-004. This street name change does not conflict with any approved specific plan, the La Quinta General Plan, or the La Quinta Zoning and Subdivision Ordinance. 2. The owners of all land adjacent to the affected street have been notified and have stated in writing that there are no objections to the change in the street name. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of La Quinta as follows: 1. That the City Council has followed the requirements of the La Quinta Municipal Code, Chapter 14.08 pertaining to Street Name Changes. RESOCC.128 1 017 Resolution 94- 2. That the City Council hereby approves Street Name Change 93-004 changing the street name from Via Soud to Via Avante. PASSED, APPROVED, AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 18th day of January, 1994, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California RESOCC.128 2 JOHN PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California C. A o e l i k /1 • t I I N'a�i• I \ Ir h W 19i !., h O• 1 f2 OJ i1 h I x I= Y I " r f It r(r a N may_ a� wy _� r� U 619 DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: REQUEST: LOCATION: BACKGROUND: PH #2 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DECEMBER 14, 1993 STREET NAME CHANGE 93-004 LAKE LA QUINTA (JIM LALOGGIA) APPROVAL TO CHANGE VIA SOUD TO VIA AVANTE SOUTH OF 47TH AVENUE AND EAST OF CALEO BAY WITHIN LAKE LA QUINTA The applicant is requesting Via Soud, which is a cul-de-sac within the off -water area of Lake La Quinta north of the Lake, be changed to Via Avante. This will coincide with the name of the project (Avante), and be the street location for their model complex. This hearing is being held in order to comply with the Municipal Code and State requirements for changing of street names. ANALYSIS: Presently the subject property is vacant and owned by the applicants. Therefore, changing the name would not have a negative impact on the property owners. RECOMMENDATION: By Resolution 93 move to recommend to the City Council approval of a street name change from Via Soud to Via Avante. Attachments: 1. Location map showing proposed street name change location. 2. Letter from applicant dated September 28, 1993 requesting street name change. 3 Draft yaralutio; PCST.156 1 C7 TO. T. 5 S. R. 7 E. C 64. MAP INDEX 2 Axow L oawl rl v"pe 9 5 NG q S-004- ^1prokok LAKE La QjINTA SEP 3 0 S93 September 28, 1993 Jerry Herman Director of Planning City of LaQuinta LaQuinta, CA 92253 Dear Mr. Herman: On behalf of Lake LaQuinta, Wilma-LaQuinta and Landrex California, I am requesting a name change for a street at Lake LaQuinta, tract #26152. The lots on Via Soud are owned by the developers but have been reserved by customers for future purchase. All of these buyers have requested the change of the existing name as it is difficult to say and not consistant with other street names in the tract. The new street name requested would be "Via Avante", the same name as the off water program. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. S-ncirel , Jim LaLoggia Project Director of Lake LaQuinta 47-305 VIA RAVENNA • LA QUINTA. CALIFORNIA 92253 �22 619-564-S407 FAX 619.564-5204 4r COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: CONSIDERATION OF SPECIAL ADVERTISING DEVICES FOR THE 1994 LA QUINTA ARTS FESTIVAL (SAD 93-034) APPLICANT: LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION SUNW,RY : AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: 2— CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: The La Quinta Arts Foundation is requesting special advertising devices to be located throughout the City. The signs will advertise and provide directional signage for the Arts Festival event (twelfth annual) to be held on March 17, through 20, 1994, in the downtown "Village" Community Park. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: � RECOMMENDATION: - Move to adopt Minute Motion 94- , approving the La Quinta Arts Foundation's (SAD 93-034) request, subject to conditions. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: RAY HE MA , PLANNING DIRECTOR CCIO12 & ­lk ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER U23 K >>CITY OF LA QUINTA MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 CASE NO.: SAD 93-034 ON FOR SPECIAL SUBJECT: ADVERTISING DEVICES UEST FROM THE LA �INICONJUNCT ON WITH NTA ARTS ITHEIR TWELFTH ANNUAL ARTS FESTIVAL ISSUES: The applicant has requested approval to establish temporary directional signs throughout the City in March, 1994 for the Arts Festival. The four day event will begin on March 17, and end on March 20, 1994. BACKGROUND: The La Quints, Arts Foundation requests special advertising devices for their March event at the La Quints, Community Park. All proposed signs have been used in previous years. All signs will be set in place on March 7, 1994, and removed by March 23, 1994. ANALYSIS/FISCAL IMPACT: Municipal Code Chapter 5.64, "Special Advertising Devices", provides for a permit to be issued by the City Council for advertising devices other than the usual and customary permanent business identification signs and includes signage for special events/occasions. Discussion 1. The proposed signs will be located within City rights -of -way, on private property, and at the downtown Community Park. The Foundation is required to obtain written authorization from property owners to place the signs on private property. 2. The Public Works Department has reviewed the sign locations and requires that the signs be located so as not to create a traffic hazard. X04=.037 3 024 City Council Findings/Action Section 5.64.020 provides, in part, that permits are to be issued for special purposes, " ..and not on a continuing basis for permanent advertising or identification purposes"; and further, that "Each permit shall be issued for a specified period of time subject to renewal for good cause shown". In taking action on a permit, the Council must find that the special advertising device applied for would not: 1. Constitute a traffic hazard or nuisance to adjacent or surrounding properties or to the public at large; nor, 2. Be detrimental to the public convenience or welfare; nor, 3 Be inconsistent off officially adopted policies ts and objectives of the General Plan and and regulations of the City all other Conditions may be assigned to any permit granted in order to harmonize it with the public purposes expressed in this Chapter of the Municipal Code. CONCLUSION: The City Council has granted the La Quinta Arts Foundation permission to have on - site and off -site advertising for the March event since its inception, subject to conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt Minute Motion 94- approving the La Quinta Arts Foundation ( SAD 93-034) request, subject to the attached conditions. Attachments: 1. Letter from the La Quinta Arts Foundation 2. Map showing locations of signs 3. List of proposed signs 4. Sign exhibit ME400T.037 4 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED SAD 93-034 - LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION JANUARY 18, 1994 1. Signs located along streets without curbs must maintain a six-foot setback between the sign edge and the edge of the pavement. 2. The edge of signs located along streets with curbs shall not be any closer than 5-feet from the back of the curb. 3. The signs shall not obstruct vision of any traffic control devices. 4. All signs must be removed by March 23, 1994. 5. Written authorization from the property owner must be obtained before installation of a sign on private property. A copy of this authorization shall be provided to the Planning & Development Department. 6. Permission for signs located outside the La Quinta City boundary must be obtained from the local jurisdiction. MF.MOOT.037 5 V t) G September 23. 1993 ATTACHMENT 1 We request that the City of La Quinta authorize placement of signs to promote La Quinta Arts Festival, a community event, according to the attached map and descriptions. The directional signs which are painted on MDO plywood will be set in place March 7th and will taken down by March 23. We are requesting approval from the City of La Quinta to place a portable billboard on the southeast corner of the intersection of Highway 111 and Washington Street for approximately two weeks prior to and during the event weekend —March 17, 18, 19 & 20, 1994. The billboard will be used to advertise this special event and to direct eople traveling on Highway 111 to turn south on Washington toward the City of La &'uinta. Please see attached map for requested sign placement. This portable sign, to be provided by Fairway Outdoor Advertising Company, is of high quality with professional artwork and lettering similar in quality to those signs used to mote the Bob Hope Classic. The sign will show La Quinta Arts Foundation logo, will contain the words "La Quinta Arts Festival —March 17, 18, 19 & 20, 1994--La Quinta Community Park", and will show a directional arrow. We request permission to hang two banners (3' s 15') by rope across the east end and across the west end- attached by rope from the palm trees. The banners will be set in place arch 21st and removed March 21st. Banners are blue, professionally lettered and say "Art Show -- This Weekend". Thank you. LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION usan Francis Festival Director Attachments Fred We r i n3 Miles ATTACHMENT 2 Pori'a Pane( W AVe 52. Ell VE 5t ATTACHMENT 3 SIGN PLACEMENT CHART (THIS CHART CORRESPONDS WITH MAP) SIGN LOCATION scm CORNER FACE ARROW I Fred WarWarwq a wuhwVm I I/T x r N.W. N saaid+t 2 Mile a Washi n I I/T x r N.W. N aravIN 3 HI I I& Wuhintwn I I/T x T Kw. N sraitlrc 4 H v 11 I a Waahin I I/T x r S.W. w rift S H' I I I& Wuhkvm I I/r x r ISLE E lek 6 Eisenhower a Wuiwnrm r x 4' Kw. N =24ftc 7 Are. SO a w I IJr x r KW. N sea*rc d Ave. SO a wash I Ifr x r N.E E wt 9 Tampico a WuNn 4' x 9' N.W. N dik 10 Tamp'Tampka a WuNngton I I/T x 2' N.E S Isk If Are. S2 a Washin n I I/r x T ISLE E right 12 Ave. 54 8 I I/r x r LE S wwoht 13 Am 52 a jefferaan I ifr x r S.E s Ink 14 Am S2 8 jeffn I IfT x r ME E =%oc Is Ara SO a I lrr x r LE S Isk 14 Am SO a leffwson 1 lrr x r Kw. N ^lam 17 Am SO a Ssw&h w I ur x r KW. N asaigrc is IT2moico A E'senAewr T x 4' N.W. N Isk 19 Bwmudu a Tampico i r x 4' Kw. w right 20 dermudu a Tampico r x 4' KW. E wt 21 Owrc Club a Tampico T x 4' N.E E Isk 22 Hi v I I I a Golf Shoe r x 4' S. w swot 23 WashiAtmet between H' I I I a 15e owwer I UT x T N WWOK 24 FWuhunton between Hijhwav I I I a EissrOh w 11/7 x T N saaigx 2S Am SO ber~ leffwson and Sunhawer 11/7 x T E saaidre 26 Wuhingwn becM Eisenhowr a Am SO I lrr x r N aaaigrc 27 Wuhingwn between {3senhowr a Am SO I [IT x r N saar(hs 26 Am 50 between Itgamw a Wuhinjwn 29 Eisenhowr bet W n a Ara Fernando I I/r x T E spailfha 30 Tampico bnw Wasa Dowt Club I I/r x r E spaiast U`'g �. DESCRIPTION: Signs are professionally lettered by Fairway Outdoor Advertising in white letters on blue background and say "Arts Festival" with foundation logo and directional arrows. Detail of description of signs 6, 9,18,19, 20, 21 and 22: #6 La Quinta Arts Festival - Stay on Washington (2' a 4' placed on Washington and Eisenhower) #9 Festival Parking (4' x 8' placed on Washington and Tampico) #18 Festival Parking (2' a 4' placed on Eisenhower and Tampico) #19 Free Parking Valet Parking (face west on Tampico and Bermudas) #20 Valet Parking (2' x 4' face east on Tampico and Bermudas) #21 Free Parking Valet Parking (2' a 4' on Desert Club and Tampico #22 La Quinta Arts Festival (2' a 4' on Highway 111 by Golf Shop) bad 4J4J W V7 d 0_ xx N �t C C O O N cr u Typical Sign Exhibit, ATTACHMENT 4 031 10 . tom• cE'k OF COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: CONSIDERATION OF AN ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMITTEE REQUEST TO SPEND ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUNDS TO HELP INCORPORATE ART WITHIN THE FRITZ BURNS PARK APPLICANT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMITTEE SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING BUSINESS SESSION: 3 CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: At its meeting of January 3, 1994, the Art in Public Places Committee met with the Parks and Recreation Director and reviewed the plans for the Fritz Burns Park. Upon completion of that review, the Committee instructed staff to prepare a report to Council requesting authorization for the Committee to meet with the architect to explore ideas to include art as part of the aquatic/tennis building or other items within the Park and to expend funds to incorporate the art work within the Fritz Burns Park. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Unknown at this time. Exact amounts will be presented to Council for authorization upon completion of the meeting with the architect. The recommended art will be paid for by using unencumbered Art in Public Places funds. Prior to expenditure of any funds, the Committee will obtain City Council authorization. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion 94-_, grant the Art in Public Places Committee permission to meet with the architect for" the Fritz Burns Park to explore the possibility of including art as part of the design. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: 4JRaY H RMAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER G3,� 5 CITY OF LA QUINTA MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF AN ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COMMITTEE REQUEST TO SPEND ART IN PUBLIC PLACES FUNDS TO HELP INCORPORATE ART WITHIN THE FRITZ BURNS PARK ISSUE: The Art in Public Places Committee (APP) would like to enhance the aquatic/tennis building or other items within the Fritz Burns Park with art. BACKGROUND: The APP Committee was established to enhance the cultural aspect of the City including, community parks. ANALY IS FI AL The architect is about to start developing the working drawings for Phase I of the park. The Committee would like to help incorporate "art" within the park. The Committee would like to use unencumbered APP funds for this purpose. Currently, the unencumbered funds available is approximately $65,000.00. The City is limited by the Ordinance to spend the APP funds on the following: 1. The cost of art work and its installation. 2. The cost of purchase or lease of art sites. 3. Water works, landscaping, lighting and other objects which are an integral part of the art work. 4. Frames, mats, pedestals and other objects necessary for the proper presentation of the art work. 5. Walls, pools, landscaping or other architectural or landscape architectural elements necessary for the proper aesthetic and structural placement of the art work; 6. Expenditures for maintenance and repair of art work. 7. Administrative expenses to otherwise implement an provision of this Chapter, however, in no event shall said administrative expenses exceed five percent of the total funds in the account on July 1 of any year nor twenty-five thousand dollars in any fiscal year. 033 MEMOJH.343 1 The recommended art will be paid for by using unencumbered Art in Public Places funds. Prior to expenditure of any funds, the Committee will obtain City Council authorization. RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion 94-_, grant the Art in Public Places Committee permission to meet with the architect for the Fritz Burns Park to explore the possibility of including art as part of the design. MEMOJH.343 2 4 4Qaw s OF M E M O R A N D i.T M TO: Council Member Michael McCartney FROM: Robert L. Hunt, City Manager} Y,_ 1) DATE: January 14, 1994 RE: Art in Public Places Pursuant to your request for information regarding history, funding, permitted uses, and available funds of the Art in Public Places ordinance and/or Committee, the attached memorandum is provided. Please advise if you require any additional information. RLH:kb cc: City Council Administrative Services 035 CITY OF LA QUINTA MEMORANDUM TO: ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER �1 FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 SUBJECT: ART IN PUBLIC PLACES INFORMATION Per your request, the following provides information on the Art in Public Places (APP) relating to history, funding, permitted expenditures, and account balance. The APP Ordinance was adopted by the City Council on January 19, 1990 (Ordinance 173). The 'ommittee members were appointed shortly thereafter. At that time the prior City Manager was one of the five Committee members. Since this time, the Ordinance has been amended twice. Once to raise the fee cap and the second to increase the membership to seven members. The Ordinance was adopted in order to provide public art throughout the City. The funds collected must be spent within two years after collected (at time of building permit issuances) or the money reflects back to the person/developer who paid the fee. The funds must be spent on activities such as the following: 1. The cost of art work and its installation. 2. The cost of purchase or lease of art sites. 3. Water works, landscaping, lighting and other objects which are an integral part of the art work. 4. Frames, mats, pedestals and other objects necessary for the proper presentation of the art work. 5. Walls, pools, landscaping or other architectural or landscape architectural elements necessary for the proper aesthetic and structural placement of the art work; 6. Expenditures for maintenance and repair of art work. 7. Administrative expenses to otherwise implement an provision of this Chapter, however, in no event shall said administrative expenses exceed five percent of the total funds in the account on July 1 of any year -nor twenty-five thousand dollars in any fiscal year. 636 To date, funds have been committed or spent on; 1) Painted Cove art work; 2) the Civic Center sculptor by Louis DeMartino, to be installed around June of 1994; 3) the Desert Hospital sculptor; and 4) the two art pieces at the One Eleven La Quinta Center (TDC). In addition, the Planning and Development Department has a $6,000 line item account for APP supplies, conferences, etc. This money is part of the APP account. The unencumbered account balance for the APP account is approximately $65,000.00. I hope this information is helpful. 637 vovr�Tv 9AA 2 O� tom. Li > Tuyl 4 `y OF n COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 2.29 , PLANNING COMMISSION AND DELETING ALL CODE SECTIONS REFERRING TO THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD WITHIN THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Pursuant to the request of the City Council at its meeting of December 21, 1993, staff has prepared an amendment increasing the Planning Commission from five members to seven and eliminating the Design Review Board. Attached is the appropriate ordinance to implement the changes. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Each Design Review Board member currently receives $50.00 per month when in attendance (maximum total $350:00). This money would no longer be allocated. The Planning Commission members currently receive $50.00 each per meeting attended. $2,250 will be transferred to Planning Commission Compensation Account. The net savings will be $1,200 per year. APPROVED BY: 4-4 RECOMMENDATION: 1. Move to take up Ordinance _ by title and number only and waive further reading. 2. Move to introduce Ordinance _ on first reading. 3. If the Ordinance is introduced, it is recommended that the Design Review Board meeting for February be cancelled. 4. Authorize staff to initiate recruitment for the two new Planning Commission positions upon second reading and approval of the Ordinance. 5. Authorize the transfer of funds. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: Y H9NAN, PLANNING DIRECTOR ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGED O O O 38 CITY OF LA QUINTA MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 CASE NO.: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 94-040 APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA L The City Council at its meeting of December 21, 1993, instructed the Planning and Development Department to begin proceedings to increase the Planning Commission from five members to seven members and to eliminate the Design Review Board. Attached is the ordinance which will implement these changes. BACKGROUND: The City Council determined that expanding the Planning Commission membership to seven from five, and eliminating the Design Review Board would shorten the approval process while maintaining a high level of development quality. These Ordinance amendments to Chapter 2.29 of the Municipal Code would increase the Planning Commission membership to seven members. Chapter 9.183 of the La Quinta Zoning Ordinance contains the Design Review provisions. This ordinance would eliminate that chapter. In addition to increasing the Planning Commission from five to seven, the revised ordinance also indicates that certain areas of experience/expertise (i.e., engineering/ architectural, etc.) are desirable but, not required. It is recommended that the solicitation for the two new Planning Commissioners be in the same manner as previous Commissioners were selected. That process consists of a detailed advertisement placed in the Desert Sun and local radio radio or cable television community service forms. The advertisement should reflect the desiribility of architectural, engineering, landscape architecture, etc., experience. The appointments will occur after the Ordinance becomes effective. 000039 ANALYSIS/FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Each Design Review Board member currently receives $50.00 per month when in attendance (maximum total $350.00). This money would no longer be allocated. The Planning Commission members currently receive $50.00 each per meeting attended. $2,250 will be transferred to Planning Commission Compensation Account. The net savings will be $1,200 per year. RECOMMENDATI l . Move to take up Ordinance _ by title and number only and waive further reading. 2. Move to introduce Ordinance on first reading. 3. If the Ordinance is introduced, it is recommended that the Design Review Board meeting for February be cancelled. 4. Authorize staff to initiate recruitment for the two new Planning Commission positions upon second reading and approval of the Ordinance. 5. Authorize the transfer of funds. MEMOSS.193 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING SECTION 2.29.010 OF CHAPTER 2.29 OF TITLE 2 AND CHAPTER 9.183, SECTIONS 9.12.010, 9.12.020 AND 9.12.030 OF CHAPTER 9.12, SECTION 9.90.050 OF CHAPTER 9.90, SECTION 9,180.030 OF CHAPTER 9.180 OF TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE TO DELETE THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD AND INCREASE THE NUMBER OF MEMBERS ON THE PLANNING COMMISSION WHEREAS, Section 9.183.040 of Chapter 9.183 of Title 9 of the La Quinta Municipal Code (the "Code") established a Design Review Board to provide an initial review of the design aspects of certain plan applications and to serve as an advisory body to the Planning Commission (the "Commission"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 9.183.040 of the Code the City Council has the power to appoint, replace, remove, ar reappnint members of the. Design Review Board; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that in the interest of timeliness and efficiency it is no longer necessary to have a separate technical review of the design aspects of certain plan applications; and WHEREAS, Section 2.29.010 of the Code provides that the Planning Commission shall consist of five members appointed by the City Council; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that due to the deletion of the Resign Rcvirw Board and the early technical review it is necessary to expand the number of members which serve on the Commission and to allow a portion of the members of the Commission to represent areas of expertise which were formerly provided by the resign Review Board. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California does hereby ordain as follows: Section 1. Chapter 9.183 of Title 9 the La Quinta Municipal (the "Code") is hereby revoked and deleted in its entirety. sectio Section 2,29.010 of Chapter 2.29 of Title 2 of the Code is hereby amended to read as shown in that document attached hereto as "Exhibit A", which document is incorporated herein by reference and made a part hereof as though it were set out in full. SErJion ;. Sections 9.12.010 and 9,12.020 of Chapter 9.12 of Title 4 of the Code are hereby amended to read as shown in that document attached hereto as "Exhibit B", which document is incorporated herein by reference and made a pan hereof as though it were set out in full. 000041 Section 4. Section 9.12.030 of Chapter 9.12 of Title 9 of the Code is hereby revoked and deleted in its entirety. S;;—Ction 5. The first paragraph of Section 9.90.050 of Chapter 9,90 of Title 9 of the Code is hereby amended to read as follows: 9.90.050 Design Review required. All uses of property, construction, reconstruction, exterior remodeling, conversions of use. landscaping, and exterior major maintenance including painting (other than for single-family detached residential which shall follow the SR zone standards) must comply with the village design standards, contained within the village specific plan and other adopted standards, as approved by the p1mming commission. Scaiort 6. Section 9.180.030 of Chapter 9.180 of Title 9 of the Code is hereby revoked and deleted in its entirety. Section 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the passage and adoption of this ordinance and shall cause this ordinance to be published as required by law. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, on this day of _, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF LA QUINTA By: ATTEST: Saundra Juhola, City Clerk John J, Pena, Mayor 000042 2.29.010 Created. Pursuant to Section 65100 et seq. of the California Planning and Zoning Law, there is establlshed for the city a planning agency, consisting of a planning department, a planning commission, and the city council, acting in combination. The planning commission shall consist of seven members, serving with such compensation as the city council may from time to time determine, and appointed in the manner and for the terms prescribed in Sections 2.04.060 and 2.06,010, respectively, of this code. It shall have the powers, functions and duties prescribed in the Planning and Zoning Law, and in the La Quanta zoning ordinance and in this code and other local ordinances; provided, that it shall not exercise any direct contracting authority as specified in Section 65007 of the Planning and Zoning Law, (Ord. 9 § I (part), 1982) 000043 9.12.010 Designation of planning agency —Membership generally. Pursuant to Section 65100 of the Government Code, the planning agency for the city of La Quinta shall consist of the city council of the city, the planning commission and the planning department. 9.12.020 Planning commission —Membership —Term. A. The planning commission shall consist of seven members appointed by the city council of the city pursuant to Section 2.29.010 of this code. The term shall be for four years. B. The commission shall perform planning and zoning duties prescribed in the Planning and Zoning Law, and in the La Quinta zoning ordinance and in this code and other local ordinances; provided that it shall not exercise any direct contracting authority as specified in Section 65007 of the Planning and Zoning Law. C. The commission shall elect one member as chairman and one as vice-chairman, to hold office at the pleasure of the members. Four members shall be a quorum and a majority of affirmative votes shall be required to carry a motion. The Commission shall hold at least one regular meeting per month. D. It is preferred, although not required, that members of the commission have expertise in the areas of architecture, landscape architecture, engineering, commercial art or graphic design. (Ord. 5 § 1 (part), 1982; county Ordinance 348 § 1.3) COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 ITEM. TITLE: CONSIDERATION OF SHORT LISTING POTENTIAL SITES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A MATERIAL RECOVERY FACILITY (MRF) TO SERVE THE EAST COUNTY AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: The MRF Task Force held its first meeting January 10, 1994; the meeting provided an excellent background and overview of the MRF development process. Several key decision points in the process will require each MRF representative to attain consensus from their City Councils. The Task Force was provided with eleven potential sites (Attachment #1); with a recommendation to limit the number of choices to two or three sites for further analysis such as construction cost estimations and accessibility. The first key decision for the Council is to short list the potential sites for the construction of the MRF. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None at this time. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion 93-_, direct the MRF Task Force appointee to identify to the CVAG MRF Task Force two or three preferred sites for the further analysis for the potential construction of a Material Recovery Facility to serve the eastern portion of the County. CCO17 Approved for submission to City C uncil: 7,,irt L. { ROBERT E.-HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000041 ATTACHMENT # 1 I' D 1994 D EcoNomics RAN 5 PUNNING MEMORANDU TO: Materials Recovery Facility Task Force FROM: EcoNomics/CH2MHi11 DATE: January 3, 1994 RE: MRF Site Selection The attached memorandum describes the work on site selection for the materials recovery facility performed to date. It also recommends that a short list of sites be decided upon so construction cost estimates can be formulated for each of the short listed sites. 000041r TECBMCAL MEMORANDUM PREPARED FOR: William O'Toole/EcoNomics Valerie Lenz/EcoNomics PREPARED BY: Ellen R. Bogardus/CH2M HILL DATE: December 28, 1993 SUBJECT: CVAG SITING TASK C PROJECT: SCE36979.A1 PURPOSE CWH/L+ CVAG, the TAC and the TWG have already spent considerable effort constructing the MRF/Transfer Station siting criteria and developing the MRF Site Matrix System. A description of the "most likely" sites was prepared by the siting committee in March 1993. The purpose of this technical memorandum is to explain the reasoning for narrowing that list of "most Iikely" sites to those which appear to be the strongest candidates and most importantly discuss the current availability of these sites. Two sites need to be chosen at the January 10th meeting of the newly formed CVAG MRF Ad Hoc Task Force. Further site analysis and comparison will be based on the following criteria: • Site development costs • Engineering requirements and costs • Hauling -cost differentials, both on an individual City basis, and a CVAG system -wide basis • Locational impacts on rates • Environmental constraints and costs of correction Construction cost estimates will then be developed for the two candidate sites based upon site building requirements and estimated MRF construction cost estimates. BACKGROUND On June 1, 1993 the CVAG Executive Committee approved the MRF Siting Matrix that had been prepared by the Recycling Sub -Group of the AB 939 Technical Working Group(TWG). Representatives from Coachella, Indian Wells, Rancho Mirage, and the 000047 11 County of Riverside Waste Management Department served on this sub -group and they developed a set of criteria that were used to compare and screen potential MRF sites. The County provided the majority of the technical work and game up with an initial list of more than 50 sites. A MRF siting matrix was developed to objectively evaluate a site's physical suitability for a MRF operation. The siting criteria was based on three areas of concern: locational characteristics; socioeconomic; and environmental constraints. Several key assumptions were made by the sub -committee regarding the establishment of a MRF in the Coachella Valley. These included the following: • In the short to medium term planning period(1995-2000) only one MRF will be established for the CVAG communities. • The Coachella Landfill will be closed in 1995, at the latest, due to seismic constraints at the site prohibiting lateral expansion. Edom Hill Landfill will accept the majority of Coachella Landfill's wastestream, while the smaller Mecca II and Oasis Landfills will be permitted to accept the remainder of the Coachella Landfill wastestream provided the MRF is closer than 25 miles from these 2 smaller sites. • For the 1-MRF scenario in the short-telplanning period, the MU is optimally located slightly west of the ce uil region of the valley( approximately in the City of_Palm_Dc=). • Composting has not been assumed to be an integral functional part of the MRF. Rather, it is a potential ancillary use if it is found to be a compatible land use for the MRF site. • The transport of residual waste and recyclables by truck is assumed to be the prevailing mode of transportation of the MRF. However, the MRF should preferably have the option of rail access to facilitate rail transport should this become feasible and/or a reality. • The MRF under the 1-MRF Scenario has a maximum daily capacity of 2,000 tons. • Political acceptability of the MRF site to the host agency was not considered. Figure 1 shows the locations and overall ranking of the top 8 sites. The locations are as follows: • Site A: South side of I-10 on Garnet Road( within the Sphere of Influence of the City of Palm Springs). 2 000048 d CVAG JtRF December 29, 1"3 Page 3 • Site S: South of I-10 West of Gene Autry Trail (within the sphere of influence of the City of Palm Springs). • Site T: South of I-10, East of Gene Autry Trail (across from Raceway in the City of Palm Springs). • New Site: On Bob hope Drive and Ramon Road (within sphere of influence of the City of Rancho Mirage). • Site I: Southwest Comer of 45th Avenue and Auto Center Drive in the City of Indio. • Site K: On Van Buran Street in the City of Indio. • Site L: South of 52nd Avenue, East and West of Enterprise Way in the City of Coachella. • Coachella Landfill: On 44th Avenue East of Dillon Road (in an unincorporated area North of the City of Coachella). TOP RANKED SITES Table 1 compares the impact ratings for the criteria used in the analysis for each of the eight sites. The matrix analysis for each site plus a plat trap is attached at the end of this technical memorandum as Appendix A. There are a number of issues that need to be considered in narrowing these sites further. • Time is of the essence given the closing of the Coachella landfill within the next 18 months. Therefore, the two prime candidate sites should be sites which are properly zoned, are available, have good site accessibility, and have the political support of the community where they are located. • Sites T, S, and A all scored well because of their close proximity to the Edom Hill Landfill. The possibility exists that Edom Hill will have to be closed earlier than planned due to seismic considerations. The County is currently undertaking a geotechnical study to better ascertain the potential for expansion at this landfill site. 000044 3 Q J �,- ZQ-j (jZ� �y���• I Q Q J •' H Q)yQ N Z O ?4f HCOmhbN b ko 40 40 40 to in W 0) N Qy�3'YJ�C :0 m j d -IS uajng uep H Z � � 7 01 ►: aUC -is uoijoijar N qi 'IS uo3bui14seM y c c ¢ ?� C s cc i `Ja adoH qo Wc0.4 2 / o N d •and uerpuI N 1 LL _ I G I ' a � / c a o a � Q m c m •- O N P n 000050 R TOP RANKED COACHELLA VALLEY MRF SITES AVAILABLILTY STATUS REPORT AS OF JANUARY 6,1994 Prepared by Paula Norton DESERT PACIFIC PROPERTIES 51-370 Avenida Bermudas, Suite 4 La Quinta, CA 92253 (619) 564-8600 000051 17 r TOP RANKED COACHELLA VALLEY MRF SITES king She Location Acreage Available 1 L Enterprise Business Confer 30 Yes South Side Industrial Way APN#'s 763-130-M (5.9ac); 763-130-034 (16.1);763-130-043 (19.5 ac) Coachella Price Per S.F. Commenwconcems -.$2488,411ft• $1.25 30 acre site is part of a 13D acre master planned business park Price based on 30 acres.prioe could vary depending on size. Owner is very interested in locating MRF to their Business Park and adjacent owner, Rancho Coachella Business Center, also supports project and would not protest All utilities are available, Ind Way paved with curb S gutter. Site ready to go! 2 K Indio Industrial Park 30.1 Yes' $2.250.000 $1.72 'Owner is concerned about the impact on West Side of Van Buren their remaining parcels. Would like APN#'s 611-410-039 (9.9 ac): additional information about the MRF. 612-110-005 (20.2 ac) Utilities available to site. Indio 3 - S South of 1-10 44.16 Yes' South West Corner Gene Autry/ Salvia Rd APNt660-190.019 Palm Springs Sphere of Influ. 4 T South East Corner 1-101 37.3 Yes' Gene Autry Trail APN it's 660-190-018 (12.1 ac) 660-190-017 (24.4 ac) Palm Springs Sphere of Influ. 5 A South Side Garnet Ave. 39.4 Yes West of Indian Ave APN#666-330-007 Palm Springs Sphere of Influ •• 'Owner of sites S 14 T own additional property in the area. They have concerns regarding locating a MRF to their site and need additional information regarding the operations. Any offer would be contingent •' upon architectual approval and determining that the operation would not have any negative impact to their remaining acreage. "Asking price would depend on the desirability. They have turned down an offer of $100,000 all cash in the past $1.379.000 $0.80 Utilites are located atthe North West comer of property. Wash runs thru property. Portion of she could be in the flood plain. 6 1 South West Comer of 45th Ave/ 30.1 Yes* $1.575.4780 $1.20 'Property is available on a long term lease Auto Center Drive basis only."Lease rate would be based APNI 611-340-034 on a value of $1.20 per s1. with a 9-12% rate Indio of return. Southern PaclWs switching yard bisects property and would be difficult to relocate. Good chance of delaying project. 7 new South Fast Corner Bob Hope! 35.1 Yes' 'Indian Property - for lease. would consider Ramon APN/673-120-009 selling but not preferred."Property appraised Rancho Mirage Sphere of Influ. 4 years ago for $3.5M or$2.30 s.f. Owner would like a 8-10% return. Negotiating with BIA could delay project Site is the main entrance'to several Desert cities. Could be a problem. 000052 Q 72 'IRV 936 %. .-X.: .. it I > z IfrrrNi FT Uaa i$+, ql > l I r r is "YOT o AV Is *0, LS ZU3 NO 0 3wo AV 2 < 2 C: ul z V, u IC z M EA -J -jw U) < o IL 0< SVY MO 3d .00 U z Ix 0 cc M no NO va < I. cc >. =dISOV3, oz cc ctun w 00 ON AAA IN:, x • 0 lu t: AIL x x m ea wiry U OBVI Ul AT co ON IN z to 4c OL ON WIL.) A 4A 000 NN 0 i in I ALTERNATIVE MRF SITES Site Location Acreage Available Price Per SF 1 Rancho Coachella Business Center 36.3 yes South of Ave 54 on Enterprise Way APNi763-280-009 (portion of): 763-290-003 Coachella Comments/concems $790.614 S0.50 What better use adjacent to a ct!y sewer treatment plant than a MRR Located at the Southerly and of Rancho Coachella Business Center. No traffic would have to drive by MRF. Wast border R/R, East borders sewer plant L tililies and paved road to site, ready to go. GREAT SITE! 2 West Side of Wheel Rd 261 yes $1.415,700 $1.25 Excellent location; dose to 1-10. storm West of Monore channel is located on the West and North APNFs 610-070-002:025 side of property. WR is on the South 610-030.0_ Side. *up to 10 additional acres could be Indio acquired adjacent to site. 3 Hope Park 84 •• '• *pending -have not be able to reach off of Bob Hope & Ramon owner yet •• previously asking $2.25 per Rancho Mirage Sphere of Influ sq. R Adjacent to NEW site. 4 South East Comer 1-10/Portola 30 yes S1.633,500 $1.25 Center of Valley, adjacent to the proposed APNO Cook St Interchange, raw undeveloped Palm Desert land:1/2 mile from paved street Site 1 & 2 are excellent sites. I would rate them just as good or even better than sites L &K 000056 _ 1f G Z M O F THE COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Traffic Control Measures on Park Avenue South of Avenue 50 and on Calle Tampico East of Washington Street SUMMARY AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: M Residents of the Painted Cove and Bajada subdivisions have expressed concerns regarding traffic on Park Avenue where it passes between these two subdivisions. Some of the traffic concerns are safety related, while others are related to neighborhood ambiance. These traffic issues were discussed at an October 27, 1993 Technical Traffic Committee meeting. Seven (7) residents attended that meeting to express their views. Staff presented a report to the Council at its December 7, 1993 meeting. However, due to incomplete traffic data, the Council directed staff to conduct additional traffic studies at these locations and return with a recommendation. Since the December 7, 1993 City Council Meeting, staff has completed traffic counts, verified traffic speeds, measured critical distances and researched the accident history for this portion of Park Avenue and Calle Tampico. The following report contains this information. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: The total cost is approximately $500, which can be accomplished within the existing Public Works budget. RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion 94 , move to direct staff to install 4-way stop signs at the Park Avenue/Painted Cove intersection along with appropriate advance warning signs advising motorists of the reverse curve situation and stop signs that lie ahead. Submitted by: Approved for Submission to City Council: 2Signature &tJ ha ��41 Robert L. Hunt, City Manager MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: David M. Cosper, Public Works Director DATE: January 18, 1994 SUBJECT: Consideration of Traffic Control Measures on Park Avenue South of Avenue 50 and on Calle Tampico East of Washington Street ISSUE: Residents of the Painted Cove and Bajada subdivisions have expressed concerns regarding traffic on Park Avenue. (Please refer to Attachment A for location map.) Some of the traffic concerns are safety related, while the other traffic concerns are related to neighborhood ambiance. The residents want the City to take corrective measures to address their concerns. BACKGROUND: The developer and residents of Painted Cove and Bajada initially expressed concerns regarding the traffic speeds on Park Avenue in 1991. At that time, the speed limit was 45 MPH. The traffic speed issue was addressed by the Technical Traffic Committee in January 1992. The Committee recommended to the Council on the basis of an engineering and traffic survey that the speed limit be decreased from 45 MPH to 35 MPH. The Council concurred and the 35 MPH speed limit was posted in February 1992. There was some slowing of traffic initially. Since then, however, it has become apparent that there is a significant percentage of traffic not observing the speed limit. At the request of the developer and the residents, this issue was addressed a second time by the Technical Traffic Committee on October 27, 1993. This time, however, the residents were invited to speak directly to the Committee. A digest of their comments can be found in Attachment B of this report. The developer of the Painted Cove and Bajada subdivisions, Mr. Peter Ministrelli, wrote a letter (Attachment C) to the Engineering. Department following the December 7, 1993 Council Meeting stating that it was not the amount of traffic that was of a concern to the residents. Instead, Mr. Ministrelli felt the following were key concerns of the residents: 1. The type of traffic 2. The traffic speeds on Park Avenue 3. The limited vision on Park Avenue Therefore, based upon comments received by residents at the October 27, 1993 Technical Traffic Committee meeting, and Mr. Ministrelli's letter, this report will focus on two key issues: 1) type of traffic --- the residents are objecting to the trucks and buses using Park Avenue, and 2) safety --- the residents are fearful of being seriously injured or killed while trying to gain access to Park Avenue from their respective subdivisions due to high speeds and limited visibility. ANALYSISIFISCAL IMPACT: The first issue, type of traffic, is being addressed by the proposed Truck Route Ordinance scheduled as a public hearing at the January 18, 1994 (today's) meeting. The proposed ordinance will prohibit trucks and buses from using Park Avenue unless they have a delivery or pick-up that requires use of Park Avenue. In addition to the Truck Route Ordinance, staff met with Desert Sands Unified School District personnel regarding the use of buses on Park Avenue. As a result of that meeting, the School District voluntarily revised its bus routes and inaugurated service on the revised routes the first day of school after the holiday break. The new route will not utilize Park Avenue. In regards to the second issue, safety, the residents strongly believe that a 4-way stop should be implemented at the intersection of Park Avenue, Painted Cove and Dry Creek Drive. Park Avenue makes an "S" curve where it passes between these two subdivisions (refer to Attachment A). The main entrance to both of the subdivisions is located midway through the "S" curve, which is the intersection of Park Avenue, Painted Cove and Dry Creek Drive. Based upon staffs review of this intersection and subsequent traffic counts, there is insufficient time for a motorist to make a left hand turn out of either subdivision onto Park Avenue, based upon the following analysis: Caltrans design standard for time 7.5 seconds to make left hand turn onto a street. Average sight distance for motorist 220 feet entering this intersection from either subdivision. 85th percentile traffic speed based 45 mph upon a 12/17/93 speed survey by Riverside County Sheriff's Department. Actual time required to make left hand turn 3.3 seconds onto Park Avenue based on 85th percentile speed. Although there have been no accidents at the Park Avenue -Painted Cove/Dry Creek Drive intersection in the last three years, the conditions encountered by motorists accessing Park Avenue from the Painted Cove and Bajada subdivisions are below acceptable standards. Therefore, the most reasonable solution to address these substandard conditions is to install a 4-way stop with appropriate advance warning signs at the Park Avenue - Painted Cove/Dry Creek Drive intersection. 000063 Other Concerns Some residents in the Painted Cove subdivision believe the only way to eliminate all the problems posed by traffic on Park Avenue is to close it to through traffic. These concerns are identified in the digest of comments contained in Attachment A. To study their proposal, staff retained a consultant to count traffic at various locations on a Wednesday and Thursday during the week of January 3 - 7, 1994. Park Avenue currently has a 24-hour volume of 2,095 vehicles. It carries 50% of the traffic accessing the school complex between 7 A.M. and 9 A.M. In the afternoon, the percent of school related traffic is reduced to 25-30% . Now that buses no longer use Park Avenue south of Avenue 50, less than 2% of the traffic consists of large trucks. This remaining truck traffic will be addressed in the proposed Truck Ordinance to be considered later in this Council meeting. The most significant finding from these traffic counts regarding the proposal to close Park Avenue to through traffic occurs at the following two intersections: 1) Avenue 50/Park Avenue, and 2) Washington Street/Calle Tampico. If Park Avenue were closed to through traffic, it would greatly increase the east -to -north bound left turn traffic at these two intersections and require significant capital improvements to make the intersections work properly. At the Avenue 50/Park Avenue intersection, east bound dual left turn lanes would have to be installed. Additionally, Park Avenue north of Avenue 50 would have to be widened to accommodate a second north bound lane to accept the dual left turn movement from Avenue 50. At the Washington Street/Calle Tampico intersection, the existing eastbound left turn lane would have to be lengthened for the near term, and eventually as traffic volumes on Tampico increase, dual east bound left turn lanes would have to be installed. As a result of these findings, staff does not support diverting traffic from the Calle Tampico/Park Avenue corridor as was recommended by the Technical Traffic Committee at its October 27, 1993 meeting. RECOMMENDATION: By Minute Motion 94 move to direct staff to install 4-way stop signs at the Park Avenue/Painted Cove Intersection along with appropriate advance warning signs advising motorists of the reverse curve situation and stop signs that lie ahead. 000064 n $ $ ATTACHMENT A 3 o i . d e r Maud X En " Q t�l - 0.65 1 c-- ATTACHMENT B This is a digest of the public comments made at the October 27, 1993 Technical Traffic Committee meeting. There were seven (7) residents in attendance. Their comments addressed only the first two items on the agenda which were: 1. Discuss Ways and Means to Reduce Traffic Volume on Calle Tampico and Park Street 2. Discuss Request for 4-way Stop at the Park Avenue/Painted Cove Intersection Public Comment: • The school buses are extremely loud. • Why do the school buses use Park Street; they should use the arterial streets. • Some cars are traveling so fast that they cross the centerline as they pass through the reverse curves between the Painted Cove and Bajada subdivisions. • A landscape contractor that maintains the landscaping on Park Avenue is concerned for the safety of his workmen. There have been several close calls, fortunately no accidents have occurred yet. • School buses do not belong on Park Street. The pavement on Park Street is only 4" thick while on Avenue 50 it is 7" thick. • There has been 3 or 4 accidents at the 90-degree turn where vehicles have crashed through the block wall. • A 4-way stop should be installed at the Park Avenue/Mountain Shadow intersection. • Park Avenue should be designated a school zone and posted for 25 MPH. • The traffic noise on Park Avenue is terrible at all hours of the day and night; as a result, it's undesirable to open the windows at night. • The buses come down Park Avenue at least 50 MPH, then just prior to entering the reverse curves, they let -off the gas and down -shift which causes such excessive noise it shakes the houses. • Pass through traffic is throwing bottles over the wall into the Painted Cove subdivision. • The average traffic speed on Park Avenue is 50 MPH or more; as a result, it poses significant trouble for residents desiring to safely exit the Painted Cove subdivision. • Park Avenue should be closed to through traffic. 0 Park Avenue is not classified as an arterial street; its not designed as an arterial; nor is it built as an arterial, yet it carries the traffic volume of an arterial and is ruining the character of the whole neighborhood. 000066 ATTACHMENT C December 15, 1993 Steve Speer . Assistant City Engineer City of La Quinta- 78105 Calle Estado La Quinta, Ca. 92253, Dear Steve, PAINTED COVE LA QUINTA We thank you for your effort in trying to get, a stop sign placed at the intersection of Painted Cove and Park Avenue. It is unfortunate that we got side tracked at the council meeting when they insisted on having a traffic study made. Everyone seemed to miss the point of our concerns. We do not need a traffic study to recognize the dangerous situation as we try to exit from these communities onto Park Avenue with the limited sight distance of 50 feet while cars are traveling 40-50 mph around that curve. Please realize that a car needs 20 feet for every 10 mph traveling to come to a stop. We have three main concerns which are not the amount of traffic but the........ 1) Type of traffic. 2) Speed the traffic travels (speed limit, is 35 mph). 3) Limited vision on Park Avenue. We are inviting you to be at our gate arty morning between 7:00 - 6:30 a.m. on any school day not knowing if you are going back to City Hall or to the hospital. We also invite each council member and the mayor to experience this thrill. I repeat, we do not need a traffic study. Once again, I want to thank you for your efforts and support. Very truly yours, J. Peter Ministrelli, President Ministrelli Construction Co. Inc. 50-415 MOUNTAIN SHADOWS JPM.rm LA QLINTA, CALIPOR IA 92253 TELEPHONE: 619.564.1949 FACSI'f ILE: 619.564.5530 000067 e"A"Ll( 1-41 �UA. lee e- qj, t7,1� I 5.f Jllkkj)tw 7*4 tK) tsk) Ttl+ 1,41 lti4 NI nw 7144 7N N4 1*4 Trothlll, rt-w I I �-;4' rH4 OW N f N! r}p NRQ N N m4 SZ ,off- 6 -GB-`t le The undersigned urge the La Quinta City Council to pass the recommendations of the technical traffic committee on various traffic issues on Park Avenue. Recommendation is to install new stop signs on Park Avenue - located at the South East corner of Big Horn Trail, South East corner of Park & Painted Cove and the North West corner of Dry Creek &Park. � � j �We feel the installation of stop signs will provide safety to ohildre by slowing the speed on Park Ave. DATE S11"TURE , S i 1�-6-93 ADDRESS CITY The undersigned urge the La Quinta City Council to pass the recommendations of the technical traffic committee on various traffic issues on Park Avenue. Recommendation is to install new stop signs on Park Avenue - located at the South East corner of Big Horn Trail, South East corner of Park & Painted Cove and the North West corner of Dry Creek &Park. We feel the installation of stop signs will provide safety to our children by slowing the speed on Park Ave. DATE IZ-(0-93 lY 3 /z , /y � 99 la�r3 rr�6 - S y7 12 --1- 93 /2-7- 5'3 0 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: CONSIDERATION OF ASSISTANCE TO BUSINESS SESSION: COACHELLA VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: The District Manager of the Coachella Valley Recreation and Park District approached the City Manager regarding City participation in the purchase and installation of new restrooms at La Quinta Community Park. The District has funds left over from a State bond act which it must spend, but not enough funds to cover the full cost of purchase and installation of the pre-fab restroom units (Attachment One). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The total cost of the project is estimated at $34,556. The District is requesting the City contribute $5,000 toward the project. If the Council approves this request, funds would be transferred from the Parks and Recreation Department Salary Budget and into a new Capital account. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council: Approve the District's request for City participation. 2. Direct staff to transfer $5,000 from the Parks and Recreation Salary Budget to a new Capital account designated "Community Park (CVPRD) Restroom Improvements". Submitted by: LINT 0H EN PA RECREATION DIRECTOR CC#.008 Approved for submission to City Council: ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000071 COACHELLA VALLEY RECREATION AND PARK DISTRICT 45.871 CLINTON STREET • INDIO. CALIFORNIA 92201 • (619) 347-3464 Robert Hunt, City Manager City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Bob: During the summer 1 approached you about the possibility of your City allotting $5,000.00 to help offset the cost of a new restroom facility at La Quinta Park. The restroom project consists of purchasing a prefab restroom building and having it installed at the park. The total amount for this project will be $34,556.00. At the present time our drawing specifications have been reviewed by your staff. The only requirement was to have the County Health Department's approval on the existing septic tank at the park. We plan to have this project completed by the La Quinta Art Festival (March 17, 1994). I would like to thank you and your staff for your help in getting this restroom installed. Sincerely, �y/� 1 yr, /l!� /- Don Martin, District Manager DM:ec cc: Board of Directors 0000721 r f k4 0glArcy o� OF COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION 94- SUPPORTING PARKS AND WILDLIFE BOND ACT OF 1994 SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: WIN The City was approached by Friends of the Desert Mountains, a mountain conservancy foundation located in Rancho Mirage, and requested that the City Council pass a Resolution supporting the Parks and Wildlife Bond Act of 1994. The Bond Act will provide grant opportunities for local governments for projects in several categories. If the Bond Act is passed by a simple majority of voters in June, 1994, the City of La Quinta could be eligible for both per capita and competitive, matching grants administered through the State of California (Attachment One). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Resolution places no demands on the City's financial resources. If the Bond Act passes, the City could benefit through the grant process. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council pass Resolution 94- endorsing the California Park and Wildlife Bond Act of 1994. Submitted by: LINT B L N P & REATION DIRECTOR CC#.009 Approved for submission to city uouncu: ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000073 Tity/ 4 40gwo MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CLINT BOHLEN, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF RESOLUTION SUPPORTING PARKS AND WILDLIFE BOND ACT OF 1994 ISSUE: To address request by Friends of the Desert Mountains for Council endorsement of Parks and Wildlife Bond Act of 1994. SUMMARY: Leatha Lockhart, President of Friends of the Desert Mountains, has been working to develop CaIPAW '94 support, originally for the initiative which qualified the ballot measure, and now for campaign purposes in anticipation of the June, 1994 election. The Friends organization serves as an education and fund raising arm of the Coachella Valley Mountain Conservancy. The Conservancy could benefit from the Bond Act of 1994 by approximately $17 million. CaIPAW '94 would also provide funding for the development of an Agua Caliente Cultural History Center ($2.5 million); a Santa Rosa Mountains National Scenic Area Visitor Center ($270,000); and an Indian Canyons education and visitor center. The City of La Quinta could be entitled to $30,000+ in Per Capita Allocation funds, as well as being eligible to compete for Bond funds in various categories, such as at -risk youth projects, trails, and historic and archaeological resources. MEMOCC.004 000074 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The Resolution places no demands on the City's financial resources. If the Bond Act passes, the City could benefit through the grant process. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council pass Resolution 94-_ endorsing the California Park and Wildlife Bond Act of 1994. Attachments: CaIPAW Information Packet from Friends of the Desert Mountains MEMOCC.004 2 000075 RESOLUTION 94- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL, OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SUPPORT OF CALIFORNIANS FOR PARKS AND WILDLIFE BOND ACT OF 1994 WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta finds that providing park and recreation services is of vital environmental, social and economic interest to the citizens of our community; and, WHEREAS, a coalition of community and conservation groups, business and labor, historic preservation and other organizations have undertaken a volunteer, community based effort to place a park, recreation and wildlife General Obligation Bond Act on the June, 1994 ballot; and, WHEREAS, the bond act will provide needed facilities for the enhancement of our community, including urban forestry, park and recreation facilities, historic preservation, and a wide variety of other programs; and, WHEREAS, CaiPAW 94 includes funding for at -risk youth facilities, in order to reduce crime, drug activity, and gang violence in our community; and, WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta could receive funding for development of park and recreation facilities if CalPAW 94 is approved by the voters; and, 000076 RESOCC.002 1 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of La Quinta endorses the CaIPAW 94 initiative, and also endorses the specific proposition that contains the measure as it will appear on the June 7, 1994 ballot. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the City Council held on this 18th day of January, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PEIVA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA J. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California RESOCC.002 2 000077 December 1993 DESERT MOUNTAINS Waking in support of the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy and the Santa Rosa Mountains National Scenic Area CalPAW 194 Endorsements Urgently Needed! Dear Coachella Valley Friends: The Californians for Parks and Wildlife initiative measure (CalPAW '94) has received enough signatures to qualify for the June 1994 election! Congratulations and thanks to all of you whose hard work contributed to a tremendous signature gathering effort over the past five months. Now is the time to put the next phase of the CaIPAW '94 campaign into action. We're writing to ask for your endorsement of CalPAW. The successful passage of CalPAW '94 presents a tremendous opportunity for protection of mountainous lands in the Coachella Valley. Your endorsement will show Coachella Valley and eastern Riverside County voters that community leaders and organizations like yours recognize the importance of CalPAW '94 in protecting and enhancing our magnificent mountains, scenic open -space, sensitive habitat areas trails and interpretive sites, and historic and cultural sites. In 1988, 65% of California voters passed Proposition 70, which funded many worthwhile projects in Riverside County totaling $ 32.4 million. One of the significant projects made possible by Prop. 70 is the recently established Indian Canyons Heritage Park in Palm Springs. But these funds have been spent and a replacement source is overdue to provide for wise investment in our county's parks and natural resources. The same coalition that :sponsored Prop. 70 - led by the Planning and Conservation League - has proposed an initiative measure to give the voters the chance next June to approve a new environmental protection bond issue totaling $ 1,998,000,000 which would provide funding for more than 400 projects throughout California. Only a simple majority is required to pass CalPAW '94. If passed, CalPAW would provide $22 million for acquisition and protection of significant resources in the Coachella Valley mountains. $18 million of the new park bond measure is allocated to land acquisition by the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy. CalPAW would also provide funds for investment in an Agua Caliente cultural history center ($2.5 million), Santa Rosa Mountains National Scenic Area Visitor Center ($270,000), and Indian Canyons education/visitor center. An additional $ 57 million is allocated to specific projects in western Riverside County. In addition, public agencies throughout the county, including local cities, will share about $ 6 million in per capita grants for parks and recreation areas and will be eligible to compete for funding in various categories, such as at -risk youth projects, river parkways, trails, and historic resources. See the enclosure for a complete list of Riverside County projects and funding programs. The time to act is now, to take advantage of exceptional opportunities to acquire land for parks, wildlife areas, and scenic open -space in our Coachella Valley. We need to pass CalPAW in 1994, or many of these opportunities will be lost forever. POST OFFICE BOX 1525, RANCHO MIRAGE, CALIFORNIA 92270 000078 TELEPHONE (619) 776-5026 a non-nmfrt rmmnradem It is important to remember that: California's first major park bond issue, which launched the State Park system, was successfully sold in 1931, in the midst of the Great Depression, injecting money into the economy as land acquired; Helping to get CaIPAW approved by the voters is vital to keeping the Coachella Valley a desirable place to live, work, and visit. Many of these projects will strengthen the increasingly important outdoor/nature tourism component of our economy Governor Wilson's Department of Finance has recently identified a $2.6 billion capital outlay shortfall for parks and a $4.0 billion capital outlay shortfall for natural resources and environmental quality. State bond measures -- there have been a total of nine going back to 1928 -- are the tried-and-true way to finance park improvements and wildlife protection projects in California. In our area, CalPAW '94 has already been endorsed by: Agua Caliente Cultural Museum City of Palm Desert Endangered Habitats League City of Indian Wells Friends of the Indian Canyons Coachella Valley Trails Council Friends of the Desert Mountains Coachella Valley Hiking Club Riverside Land Conservancy Riverside City Parks and Recreation Department Statewide, CalPAW has been endorsed by numerous other organizations, including: The Nature Conservancy League of Women Voters California Congress of Seniors League of California Cities Trust for Public Land Audubon Society California Waterfowl Foundation Sierra Club It's important that your organization joins this effort by endorsing CaIPAW '94 now. We're alerting you now so you have plenty of time to get the CaIPAW endorsement on your organization's agenda and approved before the end of IM. Enclosed, for your convenience, is a sample endorsement form/endorsement resolution. (Feel free to use your organization's letterhead and compose your own endorsement resolution or letter instead of the form). If your organization has a newsletter, now would be a good time to let your members know about the CalPAW campaign and urge them to volunteer their time and contribute to the campaign. If you have a question, please contact Katie Barrows (619/776-5026). Please don't delay - act today! Sincerely, Le Z.,'-.,"CLkhart President Friends of the Desert Mountains 000079 Californians for Parks & Wildlife 1994 Can California Afford CaIPAW '94? As fellow taxpayers, we are all concerned about the economy of California. in fiscally constrained times it is important to make sure our investments are not only sound but contribute to the further economic health of the state. California's infrastructure is financed in. large part by General Obligation bonds. This form of indebtedness is not unlike the mortgage on your home. Every year, as some bonds are retired, some new ones are sold. The State Treasurer has stated that California should reinvest up to $2.7 billion in this two-year election cycle. CaIPAW '94 creates very specific law that makes sure the money will be spent as the voters intended and not secretly hijacked to finance some politician's pet bureaucracy. One noteworthy feature of park bonds, unlike prison bonds or school bonds, is that parks and wildlife areas are investments that appreciate rather.tban depreciate. With land prices and interest rates the lowest in years, now is a perfect time to make this investment in our agricultural lands, parks, open spaces, wildlife habitats and all they nurture. It is no less important to remember that our parks and wild areas are the very foundation of the one major industry in California that has not lagged during this recession. Tourism rose slightly last year. Historically; park visitation and related spending generates $60-70 million in sales tax revenues for the State. State parks also generate around $1 billion in annual economic activity. In some rural communities, a state park is the economic center. The contribution to the economy by sportsmen runs in the millions. Furthermore, jobs in sports and recreation increased dramatically last year. One job is created with every 5,300 park visitors. Last year 70 million people visited state parks, thereby creating more than 13,000 jobs that are helping California recover from the loss of so many of its other industries. Most exciting, while the public may not know these facts and figures, time after time in the public opinion polls and the voting polls, people continue to show they agree that parks and open spaces and wild places are crucial to our quality of life. Finally, in order to remain good neighbors and protect the economy of rural areas, Ca1PAW requires management plans on lands acquired under this act as well as an up -front in - lieu payment of property taxes at the request of the county. The bottom line is that CaIPAW '94 makes good economic sense and we are committed to seeing it pass in June of 1994. We'd like you to join us. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to call. RIVERSIDE COUNTY BENEFM The Parks and Wildlife initiative (knows, as CAL -PAW 19 is a general obligation bond act which will provide nearly $2 billion to acquire, protect and develop paklan4 wildlife habitat, prime agricultural laud, coastal areas, river habitat, safe neighborhood parks, as well as cultural sad historical resources. This is aocomplbhcd by three methods: (1) designated mgios,al projects, specifying where and how funds will be spent. (2) Per capita Allocations and the Robert!-Z'bag-Harris (RZ i) bfa= grant process, mllabie to community part and recreation agenda. Per capita allocations arc based solely on population, and RZH block grants ate based on urban recreational coeds. (3) Competitive grant projects will be selected based on their merits in the appropriate catag rice. Designated Riverside County Projects ($79 million) Alkaline Plant Habitat 1-5 Bmc Springs 6 Coachella Conservancy 18 Citrus State Historic Put a Consim" Demonstration .5 EsteOe Mountain 5 Indian Canyon Cultural 4 Mystic Lake 6 Norio Hills 9.5 Santa Rou Plateau 133 Shipley ReservqlGnus Valley S Sycamore Canyon 1 Victoria Ave Restoration 1 1994 Bond Act Per Capita Allocations & Roberti-Z'berg-Harris Block Grants estimate based oil 1988 population figures (S5,952,756) Banning, City of $ 53000 Beaumont, City of $ 30,000 Beaumont -Cherry Valley R.PD. S 57,000 Blythe, City of $ 30,000 Cathedral City, City of $ 115,474 Coachella Valley R.PD. S 171,000 Coachella, City of $ 30,000 Carom, city of $ 226,175 Desert Hot Springs, City of S 31,000 Helot, City of S 138.7W Indtaa Wells, City of $ 33,326 Indio, City of S 93,000 Jurupa Area R.PD. S 269,846 Lake Elsinore R.PD. $ 54.000 Lake Elsinore, City of S 38,000 Moreno Valley, city of S 392,671 Norco, City of S 107,747 Palm Desert, City of S 54,679 Palm Spring, City of S M496 Pant, City of S 37,000 Rancho Mirage, City of S 41,624 Riverside, City of S 992AN Riverside, County of S 2,380,786 San Jacinto, City of S 56,998 Valley Wide R.PD. $ =169 Statewide Competitive Grant Funding That Could Benefit Riverside County ($90 million) Archaeological S At -Risk Youth Programs 10 Community Conservation Corps 15 Historical 10 River Parkway, 15 Trails 15 Urban Foray 5 Urban Stream, IS Statewide Projects That Could Benefit Riverside County ($101 milAoa) Boating 6t Waterways 5 State Park Acq. (unallocated) 25 State Park Development 20 State Parka Cultural 5 State Parka Historical 4 State Pub Stewardship 10 State Parks Trap, 8 Wildlife Consemtlon Board 19 Wild trout Habitat 5 The above information Wustrate& funds available to Riverside County If CALPAW 94 is passed by voters in June 1994. BOARD OF DIRECTORS l.eadut I=khnrt pll u n Gay Gray Kue-Preridm Ray Boa George P. Berkey. Marti Conley James R. DeFergc Mtzabnh Green Jean IXona,a Harris Dee Haarran Marten Haderson Ted R. Leman Drew hoods Dr. Bernard Rrliak Anita Ri br no d Jon Mark Stewart Jean Taylor R,dl, wading December, 1 I am delighted to introduce you to the premiere edition of MOUNTAIN VIEW, the newsletter of the Friends of the Desert Mountains. The Friends of the Desert Mountains are people who support the conservation and appreciation of our magnificent mountains for their scenic, cultural, and natural values. We are committed to conservation programs to hold these mountains in trust for future generations to treasure and enjoy. I invite you to join us. As you can see from this edition of MOUNTAIN VIEW, we've made great strides in just the last three years of the mountains conservation effort. Through a partnership among public agencies, corporate supporters, and the people of the Coachella Valley, over 7,000 acres of mountainous land have been protected. These acres of land are home to bighorn sheep, mountain lions, and other native wildlife, are sites of ancient Cahuilla Indian cultural resources, are traversed by spectacular recreational trails, and are the stunning scenic backdrop to our beautiful Coachella Valley. Let me share with you some of the things the Friends of the Desert Mountains are doing to protect and appreciate our magnificent mountains: 4 Working to pass the California Parks and Wildlife Initiative on June 1994 ballot. 4- Educating members and friends on our Mountains Discovery hikes. • Developing educational materials for the Santa Rosa Mountains Nat'l. Scenic Area. O Raising funds to support the Coachella Valley Mountains Conservancy • Informing the community about mountains conservation projects • Cleaning up canyons and restoring native habitats 4 Writing letters of support for mountains conservation • Working together to save our magnificent mountains. I encourage you to join us as a Friend of the Desert Mountains. And help us spread the word by giving a gift membership during this holiday season. Your support will help us continue the projects listed above and you'll enjoy the benefits of membership: free hikes and lectures, the quarterly MOUNTAIN VIEW, and a part in conservation of our mountain heritage. Take a moment to enjoy MOUNTAIN VIEW, then take another moment to fill out the membership form and mail it with your check today. Then sometime soon, take a long moment to enjoy the view, join us for a hike (our next one's December 18) or otherwise enjoy our magnificent mountains. Thanks for your support! Sincerely, La. Leath Lockhart ` President P.S. Please remember a gift membership in the Friends of the Desert Mountains for your family and friends. Thank you. A wn-profs orp"iZatiran w rking 0 .n ppva Of AC«uly . da Valley Maa "- C—e-� y 000082 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: CONSIDERATION OF MANAGEMENT OF PROPOSED CITY OF LA QUINTA BOXING PROGRAM SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: In February 1993, the City Council considered the idea of creating a City boxing program, and directed staff to further develop the concept. Staff returned to Council in April, 1993, and staff was then directed to proceed with the boxing program. The program was delayed due to the recruitment of a Parks and Recreation Director and a Recreation Supervisor. Staff understood Council's direction for the program to be: provide a diversion program to gang and at -risk youth; provide a boxing program which fosters discipline, and develops a sense of accomplishment and self confidence; and ensure that the boxing program is safe, organized, insured, and sanctioned. Staff has considered two types of programs: a preestablished program which mixes professional with amateur boxing; or a new, amateur -focused boxing program. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None at this time. APPRQVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that Council provide direction to staff regarding the basis on which the La Ouinta boxing program should be developed: A new, amateur based program operated by Mr. Ron Garcia; or 2. A preestablished program operated by Mr. Lee Espinosa which mixes professional and amateur boxing. Submitted by: CLINT BOHLEN� PARKS &_RECREATION DIRECTOR CC#.021 Approved for submission to City Council: ?1�fICJ L, fi6kij� ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER Taf 4 40u&rav MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: CLINT BOHLEN, PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION OF MANAGEMENT OF PROPOSED CITY OF LA QUINTA BOXING PROGRAM ISSUE: To determine the program focus and management for the proposed City of La Quinta Boxing program. SUMMARY: On February 16, 1993, staff presented a conceptual plan for the development of a La Quinta boxing program (Attachment One). Council requested that staff visit one other program in Indio, and return with a second report. Staff returned on April 6, 1993 with a suggested process for proceeding with the development of a boxing program (Attachment Two). The process suggested in April consisted of a total of ten general steps, which were further broken down into four preliminary steps, and six program development steps. The four preliminary steps, and action taken thus far in regards to each step, are as follows: Review program concept with Coachella Valley Joint Powers Insurance Authority (CVJPIA) and City Attorney for liability/legal review and comment Staff worked with Dennis Malloy, Claims Manager for CVJPIA. Mr. Malloy took the program proposal to his Board for review, and the Board confirmed the program's coverage under CVJPIA. Mr. Malloy approved of the coverage provided by USA-ABF. The City Attorney reviewed the insurance policy and approved the coverage. 2. Contact USA-ABF regarding City intent to assist in creating a program. Staff contacted Gary Coles, Regional Director of USA-ABF, and has continued to keep Mr. Coles informed as to the progress toward opening a program in La Quinta. MEMOCC.005 000084 2 3. Develop a final budget and program elements, including program location and intended subsidies or locate potential grant sources for covering costs of the program. The $15,658 boxing program budget was submitted and approved in the 1993-94 City Budget. The elements of the program as previously reviewed and approved for the first year are: A. Safety. The La Quinta boxing program will be a USA-ABF sanctioned program, operated by experienced, concerned volunteers whose central concern is the safety of the program's participants. B. Recreation. The La Quinta boxing program will be recreational in nature, with amateur, Olympic (USOC) style of boxing the basis for coaching, teaching, and boxing. C. Inclusive and Diverse. All eight to eighteen year old youth are welcome to participate, regardless of skill level, experience, or boxing success. Grant sources have been identified for the program. The Recreation Supervisor will be responsible for pursuing grants for program expenses when he/she is hired. The program will be located in modulars at La Quinta Middle School. 4. Conduct an interest survey to estimate interest. Staff conducted an interest survey and found approximately 45 youths are interested in participating. Staff believes this is adequate interest to initiate the program. The six remaining development steps are: recruit a head trainer; recruit a program advisory board which will assist in creating a California non-profit organization to oversee the program; order needed materials and equipment; recruit program participants and register them with USA-ABF; register program with USA-ABF; and open program. ANALYSIS/FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The issue before the Council is the direction of the program relative to program management and focus. Staff indicated in the February 16 and April 6, 1993 reports that the program was designed to be an amateur style program. Further, staff understood the Council's concerns to focus on developing a diversionary recreation experience for La Quinta youth. This understanding was incorporated in the goals of the program, and was used as a filter in determining the program's management focus and basis. In reviewing the programs in the Coachella Valley, staff noted the emphasis of each program in Coachella, Indio, Cathedral City, and Palm Springs. Coachella had the highest number of professionals associated with its program; the three other cities' programs were almost exclusively Olympic style, amateur programs. MEMOCC.005 3 In November, it was discovered that Mr. Ron Garcia of Cathedral City was closing his program. Staff contacted Mr. Garcia, and discussed the possibility of Mr. Garcia operating La Quinta's program. Staff concluded the following: Mr. Garcia would not be moving his program from Cathedral City to La Quinta, but rather a new program would be started. Consequently, La Quinta youth will not have to compete for a trainer or equipment time with residents of other cities. 2. Mr. Garcia understands and agrees with the focus and goals of our program. The Cathedral City program was designed to offer amateur, Olympic style boxing, and to serve as a diversionary program for gangs and at -risk youth, which are elements of the original direction for the La Quinta boxing program. 3. Mr. Garcia has excellent credentials and experience. He was an Army Champion and professional boxer, and has operated the Cathedral City boxing program for four years. 4. Gary Coles of USA-ABF has confidence in Mr. Garcia's abilities and has been impressed with his program in Cathedral City. Another boxing program for the Council's consideration is conducted by Mr. Lee Espinosa of Coachella. Staff's concerns with transferring Coachella's program (boxers, program, format) to La Quinta are: The Coachella program is a preestablished program, with as many as 50 boxers participating. Mr. Espinosa previously estimated that 20-30 boxers would come to La Quinta. 2. Nearly half of the active, regular Coachella Club members are professionals. In staff's discussions with other boxing program directors, professionals tend to get the majority of attention of training staff, and there is a temptation to use amateurs as a training resource for professionals. Mr. Espinosa has indicated that he prefers to administer the boxing program in Coachella (boxers, program format) rather than bringing his existing program to La Quinta. It is staff's recommendation that Mr. Ron Garcia of Cathedral City be selected for operating the La Quinta program. Mr. Garcia will operate the La Quinta program consistent with the original direction for the program, and will incorporate the program elements of safety, recreation, and diversity. Staff will return to Council with refined program elements following the Council's decision regarding program management. MEMOCC.005 4 RECOMMENDATION: It is requested that Council provide direction to staff regarding the basis on which the La Quinta boxing program should be developed: A new, amateur based program operated by Mr. Ron Garcia; or 2. A preestablished program operated by Mr. Lee Espinosa which mixes professional and amateur boxing. Attachments: 1. February 16, 1993 Staff Report "Discussion of Conceptual Plan" 2. April 6, 1993 Staff Report "Discussion of Staff Proposal" MEMOCC.005 000087 5 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: February 16, 1993 ITEM TITLE: Discussion of Conceptual Plan regarding development of a La Quinta based USA-ABF Boxing Program ATTACHMENT 1 AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: M BACKGROUND: Staff has interviewed several officials associated with United States of America -Amateur Boxing Federation (USA-ABF), including the Southern California Regional Representative, and club directors from two Coachella Valley Boxing Programs. Staff has attached a draft proposal for review and comment for a La Quinta based amateur boxing program, as well as attachments for your edification. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None at this time. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council review the attached materials and discuss the content of the Staff Report, and provide Staff with direction. Submitted by: Sig t re Approved for submission to City Council: r1X'r' � � /% TH MAS P. GENOVESE, ACTING CITY MANAGER City of La Quinta Memorandum To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Clint Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manager Date: February 16, 1993 Subj: Discussion of Conceptual Plan Regarding Development of a La Quinta-based USA-ABF Boxing Program As the Council will recall, staff discussed progress in developing a boxing program in concept for the city of La Quinta in the last two issues of the Items of Interest. Staff has discussed the idea of creating a boxing program in La Quinta with three sources: The United States Amateur Boxing Federation Regional Representative Gary Coles; Palm Springs Boxing Club Director Russell Rodriguez; and Ringside Boxing Club of Cathedral City Director Ronald Garcia. Staff went to the Cathedral City program in order to view the operations of a local club. The following is a summary of background information, program requirements and a suggested process for the City of La Quinta to consider in assisting in initiating a program in La Quinta. Relevant Background Information The United States of America - Amateur Boxing Federation (Boxing USA) is headquartered in Colorado Springs, CO. They are the recognized authority, both nationally and internationally, for all amateur boxing in America. Any Golden Gloves, Junior Olympics, or Olympics program and/or bout is sanctioned and controlled by the USA-ABF. Two comments which were repeatedly stressed as staff interviewed authorities in the area of amateur boxing were: amateur boxing should not be confused in any manner with professional boxing; and that amateur boxing is a safe, controlled, and regulated sport. The USA-ABF program is broken up into the following categories: Junior Division • 8-9 yr olds Pee Wees 16-32 yr olds • 10-11 yr olds Juniors 12-13 yr olds Intermediate • 14-15 yr olds Seniors page 2 2116/93 Bohlen to Council Boxing Scoring in amateur boxing has nothing to do with power, but rather if a boxer lands punches in the designated scoring area. Safety seems to be of the highest concern. Head gear is worn by all boxers while in the ring at all times, whether in training or in matches. Program Requirements The proposed La Quinta program would be under the authority of the Southern California Region of the USA-ABF. All boxers would be required to become members of USA-ABF, and in the process they would be insured by the USA-ABF. At least five boxers have to belong to a program in order for it to be a recognized USA-ABF sanctioned program, and thus insured for medical and liability claims. The program would be a non -City controlled or sponsored program. The use of City -owned facilities or equipment would occur by agreement between the nonprofit and the City. This fact negates the need for the City's JPIA to assume the -risk. The program would be under the auspices of USA-ABF, and the trainers and coaches would all be registered and sanctioned by the USA-ABF as well, thus certifying their fitness to lead and manage boxers, and the program. Boxers could only participate in USA-ABF sanctioned matches, and all practices must be conducted by a registered coach or trainer. Suggested Process The City should consider assisting in the creation of a nonprofit (not necessarily a 501 [c]3) with a small board of directors who would oversee the program locally, and who would communicate with the USA-ABF Regional Representative. This would allow the City to insure that quality, concerned individuals were in positions of responsibility. The board could be comprised of the head trainer, an assistant trainer, and perhaps two or three other interested, informed individuals. A program site may be the biggest hurdle. Staff has considered several temporary sites, and concludes that renting a modular space and placing it on the Fritz Burns Park site as a temporary location is the better of several options. Other options are to rent commercial space, eventually utilize the modulars at the current City Hall site, or to work with the School District to either place modulars at the Sports Complex or use Nddle School space on a set up -tear down basis. The budget attached is a draft, and may not take into consideration all costs related to an annual budget. However, it was composed with the assistance of W. Rodriguez of the Palm Springs Club, and staff feels that the budget is reflective of normal costs associated with a program such as proposed. 000090 8 page 3 2116193 Bohlen to Council Boxing A process might be the following: • Review program concept with JPIA and City Attorney for Gability/legal review and comment • Contact the USA-ABF regarding the City's intent to assist in creating a program • Develop a final budget and program goals, including program location and intended subsidies • Conduct an interest survey to insure community interest. Staff suggests a mailer to La Quinta residents/ parents of students explaining program and soliciting response as to interest. If sufficient intc=t is indicated: • Recruit a head trainer and assistant(s) • Recruit a board of directors to assist and provide guidance; create a non profit • Develop program site, and acquire materials and equipment • Recruit interested club members • Register with USA-ABF, and insure all boxers and trainers complete registration and membership requirements • Begin program Staff recommends that the City Council review the attached materials and discuss the content of the Staff Report, and provide staff direction. 000091 N Boxing Pro ram Budget for La Quinta - Draft E uio ent/Item Number Descri . Cost/item Total Cost Super Bag Gloves 4 $60.00 $240.00 Professional Bajj Gloves 4 $36.00 $144.00 Handwraps 24 $5.00 $120.00 Junior Handwraps 24 $3.75 $90.00 Headgear -Training 6 $90.00 $540.00 Headgear -Competition 6 $130.00 $780.00 Golden Gloves Mountpiece 25 $7.00 $175.00 Su and Mouthpiece 25 $7.00 $175.00 Double Mouthpiece 25 $7.00 $175.00 Boxing Gloves-Training6 $180.00 $1,080.00 Boxing Gloves -Competition 6 $220.00 $1,320.00 Punchmitts 4 $70.00 $280.00 Punchshield 2 $40.00 $80.00 No -Foul Protector 6 $90.00 $540.00 Medicine Ball 2 $55.00 1 $110.00 Heavy Bags -Canvas 2 $140.00 $280.00 Heavy Bags -Leather 2 $250.00 $500.00 Heavy Bag Springs 4 $8.00 $32.00 Speed Bags 4 $45.00 $180.00 Speed Bag Platforms 4 $85.00 $340.00- Speed Bag Swivels 4 $28.00 $112.00 Double End Balp 1 $36.00 $36.00 Ping Gong 1 $79.00 S79.00 Physicians Scale 1 $480.00 $480.00 Jump Ropes 6 $24.00 $144.00 Training Tape 1 $24.00 $24.00 Spar -mate Timer System 1 $185.00 $185.00 Push up Bars 4 $18.00 $72.00 Dual Purpose Boxing Pi 1 $5,900.00 $5,900.00 Sub Total $14,213.00 Shi 'n nsurance $25.00 M&Xontin rw ies (10%) $1,420.00 Equipment Total $15,658.00 Modular Installation $8,200.00 Modular Rental (annual cost) $14,400.00 Utilities (electric, phone, water, sewer, etc) $7,000.00 Maintenance/Misc. Costs 1 $2,700.00 Grant to Pro m-Su neWon (program mane ent) $6,000.00 Total First Year Coat $53 958.00 %M%,1 000092 10 �a� c ATTACHMENT 2 OF Tt� COUNCIL MEETING DATE: April 6, 1993 ITEM TITLE: Discussion of staff proposal for a La Quinta Boxing Program. AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: 3. BACKGROUND: At the February 16, 1993 Council Meeting, the Parks and Recreation Manager presented a staff report and analysis regarding amateur boxing programs in general, and possible costs related to initiating a boxing program in La Quinta. At that meeting, staff was directed to visit one other program in Indio and to then return to the Council. Staff visited the Indio Boxing Program located on the corner of Avenue 52 and Monroe at the home of Jim Roybal, and developed a greater appreciation for well organized, well equipped amateur boxing programs. Staff is returning to Council seeking direction in relation to the attached staff memorandum. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None at this time. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the City Council provide direction as to whether to proceed with the suggested process for initiating a boxing program in La Quinta. Submitted by: Approved for submission to Clint Bohlen, City Council: Parks and Recreation Manager S nature OMAS P. GENOVESE, ACTING CITY MANAGER 000093 11 City of La Quinta Memorandum To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: Clint Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Manager Date: April 6, 1993 Subj: Discussion of Staff Proposal for a La Quinta Boxing Program Issue. The Parks and Recreation Manager is requesting that the Council provide direction regarding proceeding with an amateur, USA Boxing Program. BACKGROUND At the February 16, 1993 Council meeting, the Parks and Recreation Manager presented information to the Council about the USA/ABF amateur boxing program. Also presented was a draft budget for a boxing program assuming that a facility and equipment were required in order to initiate a program in La Quinta. During the course of Council discussion it was suggested that the Parks and Recreation Manager view one other program located in Indio. Staff did in fact visit Tun Roybal's Indio Boxing Club located at Avenue 52 and Monroe. At the time of the visit there were approximately twenty youth in attendence, ranging in ages 14-19. Half of the youth had been brought to the program by Russell Rodriguez of the Palm Springs Boxing Club for training. The program is conducted in an open space, and the equipment is in need of replacement and/or repair. Despite the rather spartan environment, it was obvious that the trainers enjoyed their role as encourager and teacher, and the youth were serious about training. In staff s opinion this program is on one end of the spectrum of possibilities for providing a boxing program for the youth of La Quints In La Quinta it appears that the biggest obstacle in starting a program is finding a facility. Options are to lease a temporary facility; to rent commercial space providing a lessor is agreeable; to utilize City owned modulars to be used as a temporary site; or, as in the case of Tim Roybal's program, develop an out of doors site with minimal cost. In the staff report of February 16 there were several suggestions made as to a process with which to proceed if the City desires to create a program. The Parks and Recreation Manager would like to revisit the suggestions made previously, and to receive Council direction as to proceeding with a program for La Quinta. 00009412 page 2 4/6/93 Boxing Program Preliminary Coasidmwdons 1. The City should consider assisting in the creation of a nonprofit (not necessarily a 501[c]3) with a small board of directors who would oversee the program locally, and who would communicate with the USA-ABF Regional Representative. This would allow the City to insure that quality, concerned individuals were in positions of responsibility. The board could be comprised of the head trainer, an assistant trainer, and perhaps two or three other interested, informed individuals. 2. A program site is the biggest hurdle. Staff has considered several temporary sites, and concludes that renting a modular space and placing it on the Fritz Burns Park site as a temporary location is the better of several options. Other options are to rent commercial space, eventually utilize the modulars at the current City Hall site, or to work with the School District to use existing modulars at the Sports Complex/Middle School. 3. The budget attached is a draft, and may not take into consideration all costs related to an annual budget. However, it was composed with the assistance of Mr. Rodriguez of the Palm Springs Club, and staff feels that the budget is reflective of normal costs associated with a program such as proposed. Staff has included the costs reflected in the attached budget as a program item in the Community Services (4195) budget being developed for 1993-94. The program expenses suggested in the attached budget are what staff considers as the high -end, and between now and the formation and recruitment of boxing program coaches, City staff will hopefully locate a less expensive site option. In the meantime, City staff can attempt to acquire private funding for the start up and program costs involved with the boxing program to reimburse the possible City outlay for the program in the 93-94 City budget. ftZested Process The staff proposed process for initiating a boxing program in La Quinta is the following: • Review program concept with JPIA and City Attorney for liability/legal review and comment • Contact the USA-ABF regarding the City's intent to assist in creating a program • Develop a final budget and program goals, including program location and intended subsidies or locate potential grant sources for covering costs of the program • Conduct an interest survey to insure community interest. Staff suggests a flyer distributed to students of La Quinta and their explaining the program and soliciting response as to interest. The above activities would be conducted between now and June 1 000095 13 page 3 4/6193 Boxing Program If sufficient mtemst is in&csted.- • Recruit a head trainer and assistant(s) • Recruit a board of directors to assist and provide guidance; create a non profit • Develop program site, and acquire materials and equipment • Recruit interested club members • Register with USA-ABF, and insure all boxers and trainers complete registration and membership requirements • Begin program by September 1. RECOMMENDATION The Parks and Recreation Manager requests Council direction as whether to proceed with the suggested process for initiating a boxing program in La Quinta. 000096 14 Shcetl Boxing Pro ram Budget for La Quinta - Draft E uio ment/Item Number Descri . Cost/Item Total Cost Super Bag Gloves 4 $60.00 $240.00 Professional Bag Gloves 4 $36.00 $144.00 Handwraps 24 $5.00 1 $120.00 Junior Handwraps 24 $3.75 $90.00 Headgear -Training 6 $90.00 $540.00 Headgear -Competition 6 $130.00 $780.00 Golden Gloves Mountpiece 25 $7.00 $175.00 Superguard Mouthpiece 25 $7.00 $175.00 Double Mouthpiece 25 $7.00 $175.00 Boxing Gloves -Training 6 $180.00 $1,080.00 Boxing Gloves -Competition 6 $220.00 1 $1,320.00 Punchmitts 4 $70.00 1 $280.00 Punchshield 2 $40.00 $60.00 No -Foul Protector 6 $90.00 $540.00 Medicine Ball 2 $55.00 $110.00 Heavy Bags -Canvas 2 $140.00 $280.00 Heavy Bags -Leather 2 $250.00 $500.00 Heavy Bag Springs 4 $8.00 $32.00 Speed Bags 4 $45.00 $180.00 Speed Bag Platforms 4 $85.00 $340.00 Speed Bag Swivels 4 $28.00 $112.00 Double End Bags 1 $36.00 $36.00 Ring Gong 1 $79.00 $79.00 Physicians Scale 1 $480.00 1 $480.00 Jump Ropes 6 $24.00 $144.00 Training Tape 1 $24.00 $24.00 Spar -mate TimerSystem 1 $185.00 $185.00 Push up Bars 4 $18.00 $72.00 Dual Purpose Boxing Ring 1 $5,900.00 $5,900.00 Sub Total $14,213.00 Shipping/insurance $25.00 MiscJContin ncies (10%) $1,420.00 Equipment Total $15,658.00 Modular Installation $8,200.00 Modular Rental (annual cost) $14,400.00 Utilities (electric, phone, water, sewer, etc) $7,000.00 Maintenance/Misc. Costs I 1 $2,700.00 Grant to Program -Supervision (program management) $6,000.00 Total First Year Cost 553,958.00 0.00097 15 �T s COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of La Quinta Arts League Facility Use Application and Request to Waive Applicable Fees AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: I CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: The La Quinta Arts League has requested use of the Civic Center facility as part of their Home Tour fundraising event on February 12, 1994 from 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. (Attachment 1). Council approved guidelines for use of the facility on October 19, 1993 (Attachment 2). Pursuant tothe the use of the facility is $32 per hour, pus guidelines, the cost for refundable cleaning deposit. The Arts League has requested that all of the fees be waived (Attachment 3). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The fees required by the policy are: Facility Use - 6 hours x $32/hour = $192 Refundable Cleaning Deposit of $500 = $500 APPROVED BY; RECOMMENDATION: Approve the La Quinta Arts League application in accordance with the Guidelines for Use of Civic Center Facility, including applicable fees. Submitted by: Approved for submission to Pamela LiCalsi City Council: Personnel & Budget Manager G M ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER Signature 000098 ATTACHMENT 1 Y4 M OF 7H� Organization: Persons) In Charge: /3 X, -N1) % Phone: 721- 34,06 Address: 95--605 Acf334_G Facility Requested: /-A ( U_I 14- L i L/Ie LEN1G2 Type of Event: Public / Private Description of Activity: �f'A,�Cci_ Tic,Yi=n � S,r`,CaeiY/r ,t°E/i'i=tf/ m.=ivrr" ZL.A,Z_ Date(s) of Use: 1 Li Size of Group: Scc> Time of Use: Start (a.m./p.m.) /J AM Finish (a.m./p.m.) / Total Hours of Use � x $32.00 /hour as $ Certificate of Additional Insured Attached: -or- City Insurance Requested: Fee Paid: S Refundable Cleaning Deposit Paid: S Session Room = $200 Council Chambers (up to 53 people) = $300 Council Chambers (54 people plus) = $500 Total Paid: The undersigned hereby agrees to abide by the rules and regulations of the City of La Quinta relating to the use of public facilities. Date: Signature: Title: >� LI-0 5 77 Deposit Required For: Deposit Returned: Date: NOTE: The parson signing the application and the statement. of information moat be an officer of the sponsoring organization. If the person is not an officer of the organization for which application is roads, be/sha must present written autborization from the group to sign. ATTACHMENT 2 I II III IV CITY OF LA QUINTA GUIDELINES FOR USE OF CIVIC CENTER FACILITY FACILITIES AVAILABLE FOR USE 1.. Council Chamber - seats 106. 2. Study Session Room - seats 33. 3. Groups are to use the Study Session Room unless the size of the group or the need for audio-visual equipment necessitates use of the Council Chamber. CITY USE OF CIVIC CENTER 1. The primary use of the Council Chamber and Study Session Room is for the conduct of meetings for the entities listed below: a) City Council b) Planning Commission c) Community Services Commission d) Design Review Board e) Art in Public Places f) Investment Task Force g) Other City appointed boards, commissions and committees ORGANIZATIONS QUALIFYING FOR USE APPLICATIONS 1. Other non-profit, 501(C) entities, that serve residents of La Quinta, may be granted permission by the City Council to use the facilities. APPLICATION & APPROVAL PROCESS 1. A person or group desiring to use Civic Center facilities must file an Application for Use Permit with the City Manager's Office. Applications must be completed and submitted at least three calendar weeks prior to the scheduled event, unless otherwise waived by the City Council. 2. All qualified groups using the Council Chamber and Study Session Room must have $500,000 general liability insurance coverage per occurrence, listing the City of La Ouinta as an additional named insured. Groups that do not have insurance may purchase special event insurance through the City's insurance policy. 000100 V. VI 3. All applicants must indemnify and hold the City harmless from any and all losses and/or claims. Indemnification forms will be provided by the City and must accompany submittal of the Use Permit Application. 4. Users of the Council Chamber and Study Session Room will be responsible for all damage to the building, appurtenances thereto, and shall be responsible for reimbursement to the City for any loss or damage to City property caused by such use. 5. The City must be notified as soon as possible of any cancellations, so that the facility may be reassigned. 6. Approval shall be granted by the City Council. The City Manager is authorized to permit a use when the Council meeting schedule precludes Council consideration in a timely manner. Approved permits will be issued to the person filing the application prior to the event. 7. In the interest of widest community use of the Civic Center facilities, no one non-profit community group shall use the facility more than eight (S) hours per month. FEES FOR USE OF FACILITY 1. The City shall charge for after hours use of Civic Center facilities. Said charge is to recover full cost for use of the facility (personnel, equipment, electricity, etc.) and shall be paid prior to the use. The hourly rate shall be established by the Council during the City's Annual Budget Review process. 2. A refundable cleaning deposit is required. The City may withhold all, or a portion, of the deposit if cleanup is required. The deposit will be established based on the use as follows: (a) Session Room = $200 (b) Council Chambers (up to 53 people) _ $300 (c) Council Chambers (54 people plus) _ $500 CIVIC CENTER EQUIPMENT 1. City owned audio visual and public address equipment may be used, provided City staff is responsible for its operation. 000101 VII. USAGE LIMITATIONS 1. Any proposed use of the Council Chamber or Study Session Room shall not lead to the cancellation of a regularly scheduled meeting. 2. For non -City functions, use of the Chamber and Study Session Room shall not be prior to 8 a.m. or extend beyond 10 P.M. 3. Food, water, and beverages shall not be consumed in the Civic Center facilities. 4. Smoking shall not be permitted anywhere in the Civic Center. 5. Juvenile organizations shall have adequate supervision when using Civic Center facilities at a ratio of not less than one adult per twenty minors. Disregard of this rule shall be considered cause for immediate cancellation of the Use Permit. 6. Any approved Application for Use of Facilities may be revoked without previous notice where conflicting dates with a City purpose have subsequently developed. For other cause (s), permits may be revoked at any time upon 24 hours notice. 7. No animals, except those necessary for disability assistance, are permitted in the Civic Center. 8. No admission fees may be charged, unless as a fund- raiser for the organization renting the facility. 9. These guidelines may be modified at the discretion of the City Council. FY 1993/94 hourly rate for use of the facilities is $32 00010 January 12, 1994 Mayor John Pena Council Members CITY OF LA QUINTA Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena and Council Members: ATTACHMENT 3 • ALAQUINTA fWTS FOUNDATION I am writing to you regarding the 1994 Arts League La Quinta Home Tour Event. This year the home tour features exquisite homes in beautiful La Quinta. The Arts League has requested the City of La Quinta allow the use of the Civic Center Atrium from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. for a reception area that is the culmination of this special event Saturday, February 12, 1994. The members of The Arts League are proud of the new Civic Center and feel that by using the Civic Center as of this remarkable a special feature of the Tour, they will cultivate greater awareness and appreciation facility. I am sure that the Mayor and Council are well aware of the many good works of The Arts League of La Quinta Arts Foundation. The League provides invaluable support services to La Quinta Arts Foundation as volunteers for our many community events, as docents/instructors for our public school programs and as fund-raisers. The annual Home Tour is a significant community fundraising eveaL. Proceeds from this event are donated by The Arts League to La Quinta Arts Foundation and contribute to the support of our Young at Art programs, Youth Scholarship programs, Art Beat and Making Friends with Great Works of Art Programs. These programs are provided to the children of the Coachella Valley free of cost to the families served. On behalf of La Quinta Arts Foundation and The Arts League we ask that the Mayor and Council waive the fee for the use of the Civic Center Atrium for this community Home Tour event. We feel that the public service provided by The Arts League to the City of La Quinta justifies this request. Thank you for your consideration of this matter! Sincerely, LA QUINTA ARTS FOUNDATION 4 / Carolyn Frances Lair Executive Director CFL/tg cc: Bob Hunt, City Manager 000103 POST OFFICE BOX 777 • LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 (619) 564-1244 FAX (619) 564-6884 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Affirmative Action Policy AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: it CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: The Affirmative Action Policy was distributed to Council for review on January 7, 1994. This policy is designed to bring the City into compliance with federal and state requirements. The plan provides guidelines for employment practices, but in no way establishes hiring quotas. The goal of the program is to have the City's work force reflect the labor pool in the community. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Approve the Affirmative Action Policy. Submitted by: Approved for submission to Pamela LiCalsi, City Council: Personnel & Budget Manager 4" 4 &,t �Lict-F" Signature ROBERT L. HUNT, C 000104 CITY OF LA QUINTA AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN FOR 1994 - 1998 Introduction "An affirmative action program is a set of specific and result - oriented procedures to which a contractor commits himself to apply every good faith effort. The objective of those procedures plus such efforts is equal employment opportunity. Procedures without effort to make them work is meaningless; and effort, undirected by specific and meaningful procedures, is inadequate. An acceptable affirmative action program must include an analysis of areas within which the contractor is deficient in the utilization of minority groups and women, and further, goals and timetables to which the contractor's good faith efforts must be directed to correct deficiencies exist." U.S. Department of Labor, office of Federal Contract Compliance. The City of La Quinta will not discriminate against any employee or applicant in employment decisions because of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, ancestry, medical condition, marital status, handicap or veteran's status (except where sex or age is a bona fide occupational qualification). Decisions in hiring, promotion, demotion, transfer, working conditions, compensation, training and discharge will be based on the business needs of the City and will not be made with unlawful discrimination. This legal responsibility and ethical commitment is codified through the following Affirmative Action Plan. The plan reflects analysis of the City's work force characteristics, policies and practices with the purpose of discovery and elimination of improper activities. Where appropriate, the City sets goals for future employment decisions. This Plan establishes a written commitment to equal employment opportunity and affirmative action to be communicated to and supported by all staff members 000101-- AFFIRMATIVE ACTION POLICY STATEMENT It is the policy of the City of La Quinta to ensure equal employment opportunity through Affirmative Action to all persons regardless of their race, color, national origin, religion, sex, handicap, ancestry, medical condition, marital status, or age (except where sex or age is a bona fide occupational qualification). The City shall act to ensure equal treatment to all persons in matters impacting recruitment, hiring, promotion, discipline, compensation, assignment, benefits, training, layoff and recall practices and any other matters impacting employment with the City of La Quinta. The same policy applies to all qualified Vietnam era veterans, disabled veterans or other persons with disabilities who are capable of performing a particular job with reasonable accommodation to their disability. The City of La Quinta, recognizing the need for affirmative action to achieve equal opportunity employment, commits itself to initiating a comprehensive Affirmative Action Program. The management and direction of the City of La Quinta Affirmative Action Plan shall be the responsibility of the Personnel and Budget Manager. The implementation of the plan shall be the primary responsibility of the City Manager, Department Directors supervisory personnel, and the City Personnel and Budget Manager. Robert L. Hunt Pamela LiCalsi City Manager Personnel & Budget Manager 000106 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PLAN The City Manager has ultimate responsibility for the Affirmative Action Program. Department Directors, City supervisory personnel, and the City Personnel and Budget Manager have the primary responsibility for implementing the plan through recruitment and promotional efforts. The Personnel & Budget Manager and the Affirmative Action Committee have the responsibility of managing and directing the plan. 1. PERSONNEL & BUDGET MANAGER The Personnel & Budget Manager will be appointed by the City Manager. The duties and responsibilities of the Personnel & Budget Manager include but are not limited to the following: (a) Assure that the City's Affirmative Action Plan is given to all Department Directors; (b) Monitor and update the City's work force figures and percentages as required in the City's Affirmative Action Plan or as requested by appropriate authority; (c) Fulfill the auditing and reporting requirements of the Affirmative Action Plan; (d) Assign recruitment participation to ethnic minority and women employees; (e) Assure that all employees of the City are aware of the City's Affirmative Action Grievance Procedures; (f) Act as chairperson of the Affirmative Action Committee; (g) Assure that updated information on Affirmative Action requirements is distributed to all Department Directors and supervisory personnel on an ongoing basis; (h) Participate in the selection and dismissal of employees as related to Affirmative Action; (i) Maintain liaison with organizations representing ethnic minorities, women and persons with disabilities. The identity of the Personnel & Budget Manager shall appear on all internal and external communications dealing with the City's Affirmative Action Program. 000107 ff: 3 CITY OF LA QUINTA AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COMMITTEE The Affirmative Action Committee shall consist of one member from each department (Department Coordinators) and supplementary representation as deemed necessary by the City Administration. The City of La Quinta Affirmative Action Committee will be responsible for the following functions under this plan: (a) Review all objectives annually to ensure that they are meeting the needs of the City; (b) Review the areas of responsibility assigned to the Affirmative Action Officer to ensure compliance; (c) Review the Affirmative Action Plan on an annual basis with recommendations, if any, to the City Manager for modifications and clarification; (d) Participate in the Affirmative Action Grievance Procedure as provided in this plan. DEPARTMENT AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COORDINATOR Each department of the City of La Quinta will be represented by an Affirmative Action Coordinator who is responsible for the management of the Affirmative Action Plan on a departmental level. Department Directors are required to allow adequate time for their Affirmative Action Coordinator to perform the required duties. In order to provide a greater number of individuals with the opportunity to participate on the Affirmative Action Committee, each Affirmative Action Coordinator will serve for a term not to exceed two (2) years. Selection (a) The Department Affirmative Action Coordinators will act as representatives of their respective departments; (b) The Coordinator, whenever possible, will be an ethnic minority, woman or person with a disability; (c) Each Department Director will submit to the Personnel & Budget Manager two names of persons to be the Coordinator; (d) The Personnel & Budget Manager will review the names and recommend to the City Manager the appointments to be made from those names submitted. Responsibilities (a) Manage the Affirmative Action Plan on a department level; (b) Attend regular meetings of the Affirmative Action Committee as an active member of the Committee; (c) Aid the City's Personnel Division in the selection process of applicants, i.e., as possible members of an oral rating board; (d) Perform other duties related to the Affirmative Action Plan as designated by the Personnel & Budget Manager. 4. SUPERVISORY PERSONNEL The affirmative action effort of all Department Directors and supervisory personnel will be an element of evaluation of their work performance AUDIT AND REPORTING SYSTEM DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES A. Personnel & Budget Manager 1. The Personnel and Budget Manager shall design and implement an audit and reporting system that will measure program effectiveness, and meet State and Federal requirements. 2. The Personnel & Budget Manager shall prepare an annual report to the City Manager and City Council summarizing the period's activities and recommending any program revisions. The annual report shall be reviewed by the Affirmative Action Committee prior to submittal to the City Council, and include the following information by sex and ethnic group: (a) Applications received for City jobs (b) Examination results (c) Appointments (d) Work force survey (e) Narrative analysis of problem areas and progress on the Affirmative Action Plan. 000109 3. The Personnel & Budget Manager shall have the responsibility for maintaining the following information by ethnic group and sex: (1) Application received for City jobs (2) Record of examinations administered (3) Record of new employee and appointments (4) Record of promotions (5) Record of separations (6) Record of current City work force (7) Special recruitment efforts (8) Special provision of educational opportunities The annual reports will be due in December of each year. ETHNIC AND OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORIES Following are ethnic and occupational categories used for this Affirmative Action Plan: Code Letter ETHNIC CATEGORY A. White (Not of Hispanic Origin): All persons having origins in any of the original peoples of Europe, North Africa, or Middle East. B. Black (Not of Hispanic Origin): All persons having origin in any of the black racial groups of Africa. C. Hispanic All persons of Mexican, Puerto Rican, Cuban, Central or South American or other Spanish culture or origin, regardless of race. D. Asian or Pacific All persons having origins in any of the Islander original peoples of the Far East, Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, or the Pacific Islands. This area includes China, Japan, Korea, the Philippine Islands, and Samoa. E. American Indian or All persons having origins in any of the Alaskan Native original peoples of North America, and who maintain cultural identification through tribal affiliation or community recognition. 000110 The occupational categories listed below are consistent with those established by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) for their reporting requirements. Code Number OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORIES 1 Officials and Administrators Occupations in which employees set broad policies, exercise overall responsibility for execution of these policies, or direct individual departments or special phases of the agency's operations, or provide specialized consultation on a regional, district or area basis. Includes department directors, bureau chiefs, division managers, directors, deputy directors, controllers, examiners, superintendents, sheriffs, police and fire chiefs and inspectors, and kindred workers. 2. Professionals Occupations which require specialized and theoretical knowledge which is usually acquired through college training or through work experience and other training which provides comparable knowledge. Includes personnel and labor relations workers, social workers, doctors, psychologists, registered nurses, economists, dieticians, lawyers, system analysts, accountants, engineers, employment and vocational rehabilitation counselors, teachers or instructors, police and fire captains and lieutenants, and kindred workers. 3. Technicians Occupations which require a combination of basic scientific or technical knowledge and manuel skill which can be obtained through specialized post -secondary school education or through equivalent on-the-job training. Includes computer programmers and operators, draftspersons, surveyors, licensed practical nurses, photographers, radio operators, technical illustrators, technicians (medical, dental, electronic, physical sciences), assessors, inspectors, police and fire sergeants, and kindred workers. 4. Protective Service Workers Occupations in which workers are entrusted with public safety, security and protection from destructive forces. Includes police patrol officers, fire fighters, guards, deputy sheriffs, bailiffs, correctional officers, detectives, marshals, harbor patrol officers, and kindred workers. 000111 S. Paraprofessionals Occupations in which workers perform some of the duties of a professional or technician in a supportive role, which usually requires less formal training and/or experience than normally required for professional or technical status. Such positions may fall within an identified pattern of staff development and promotion under a "New Careers" concept. Includes library assistants, research assistants, medical aides, recreation assistants, homemakers aides, home health aides, and kindred workers. 6. Administrative Support Occupations in which workers are responsible for internal and external communication, recording and retrieval of data and/or information and other paper work required in an office. Includes bookkeepers, messengers, office machine operators, clerk -typists, stenographers, court transcribers, hearing reporters, statistical clerks, dispatchers, license distributors, payroll clerks, and kindred workers. 7. Skilled Craft Workers Occupations in which workers perform jobs which require special manual skill and a thorough and comprehensive knowledge of the processes involved in the work which is acquired through on-the-job training programs. Includes mechanics and repair workers, electricians, heavy equipment operators, stationary engineers, skilled machining occupations, carpenters, compositors and typesetters, and kindred workers. 8. Service/Maintenance Occupations in which workers perform duties which result in and contribute to the comfort, convenience, hygiene or safety of the general public or which contribute to the upkeep and care of buildings, facilities or grounds of public property. Workers in this group may operate machinery. Includes chauffeurs, laundry and dry cleaning operators, truck drivers, bus drivers, garage laborers, custodial personnel, gardeners, and groundkeepers, refuse collectors, construction laborers. 000112 ANALYSIS AND PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT The objectives listed below will help to ensure non-discrimination and assist in the attainment of Affirmative Action goals. The objectives listed in Section A will assist the City reaching these goals for minorities, women and persons with disabilities. Section B contains some additional objectives which will allow the City to provide reasonable accommodation for persons with disabilities. A. OBJECTIVES 1. Recruitment (a) Special efforts shall be undertaken as part of the recruitment process to attract ethnic minorities, females, and persons with disabilities. All job announcements shall state that the City is an Equal Opportunity Employer. (b) The Personnel and Budget Manager shall seek employment referrals from groups and organizations representing ethnic minorities, women and persons with disabilities. (c) The Personnel and Budget Manager shall be responsible for posting and distributing information on promotional opportunities to all departments in order to attract ethnic minorities, women, and persons with disabilities. (d) The use of advertising media aimed at ethnic minorities, women and persons with disabilities may be utilized to attract qualified candidates. (e) The Personnel and Budget Manager, in cooperation with department supervisory personnel, and/or appropriate Affirmative Action Committee members, shall review job announcements to ensure that only qualifications necessary to perform the job are required. (f) Subject to budget considerations, the City shall participate in job fairs sponsored by community organizations and educational institutions. 000113 2. Examinations and Final Selection (a) A representative from Personnel and the appropriate Department Director or designated representative shall conduct the initial screening of applications. (b) A member of the Affirmative Action Committee may be selected to serve on an oral board whenever a member has expertise related to the job opening. (c) An attempt shall be made to select a female and/or a minority person to serve on oral boards. (d) Outside oral board members shall be provided with information on the City's Affirmative Action Plan goals as part of the briefing process. (e) Oral board members shall be provided with guidelines on questions that should not be asked of applicants. (f) The City shall use only professionally developed written examinations with demonstrated validity for job relatedness. (g) A candidate's knowledge of Affirmative Action may be one of the criteria considered for appointment to supervisory positions. 3. Education and On -the -Job Training (a) Subject to budget considerations, the City shall continue to make available to all employees its Tuition Reimbursement Plan for job -related training. (b) Personnel shall maintain information on educational programs that would improve the promotability of ethnic minority, women, and persons with disabilities. (c) The Personnel and Budget Manager shall have the responsibility of developing and providing Affirmative Action training programs for all management and supervisory personnel. (d) Trainee positions may be considered for certain job classifications. 000114 4 0 Promotion Process (a) Promotional opportunities shall be posted in accordance with the City's job posting procedures. (b) Employees shall be provided with formal performance evaluation process. (c) Subject to budget considerations, career counseling will be provided to assist employees to improve oral interviewing skills and written test -taking skills. (d) Written materials and programs to inform employees about traditional and non-traditional promotional opportunities will be provided. (e) Information to assist employees in assessing their potential and how to prepare for advancement will be developed. (f) Subject to budget considerations, in-house training programs will be sponsored as a part of ongoing efforts to assist minorities and women in gaining the training and education to prepare them for promotional opportunities. (g) Subject to budget considerations, the City shall make available its Tuition Reimbursement program to assist employees in gaining training and education that would provide them with promotional opportunities. Miscellaneous (a) The City's employee evaluation forms shall include a section on Affirmative Action for all supervisory personnel. (b) The City's Affirmative Action Plan shall be distributed to all departments. (c) Information on the City's Affirmative Action Program shall be incorporated into the Employee Orientation. 000115 B. OBJECTIVES FOR VIETNAM ERA VETERANS, DISABLED VETERANS AND PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES In keeping with the provisions of the City's Affirmative Action Program, it is the policy of the City to recruit, hire, and promote individuals in all job classifications without regard to their status as a Vietnam Era Veteran, qualified disabled veteran or person with a disability capable of performing a particular job with reasonable accommodation to their disability. 1. Personnel shall review all physical qualifications for positions to ensure that they are job -related. 2. The City shall make every effort to publicize that it is an Equal Opportunity Employer and hires persons with disabilities. 3. Persons with disabilities shall be treated equally in all phases of employment except where physical requirements are a bona fide occupational qualification. 4. Where possible, special arrangements shall be made to accommodate disabled applicants at examination sites. 5. Reasonable accommodations shall be made for employees with disabilities. 6. If a City employee becomes disabled while working for the City, the City shall make every effort to place the individual in another City position for which he/she is qualified. 7. City facilities shall be reviewed and modified for compliance with State provisions for handicapped access as funding permits. Supplemental EEO/Affirmative Action Policies and Procedures Relating to Covered Veteran and Individuals with Disabilities: 1. Medical Examinations. When the City of La Quinta inquires into an applicant's or employee's physical or mental condition or conducts a medical examination prior to employment or change in employment status, information obtained in response to such inquiries or examination shall be kept confidential except that: (a) Supervisors and managers may be informed regarding restrictions on the work or duties of disabled veterans and individuals with disabilities and regarding accommodations; 000116 (b) First aid and safety personnel may be informed, where and to the extent appropriate, if the condition might require emergency treatment; (c) Government officials investigating compliance with the Act shall be informed. 2. Accommodation to Physical and Mental Limitations. The City will make reasonable accommodations to the physical and mental limitations of qualified disabled veterans and handicapped individuals unless the City can demonstrate that such an accommodation would pose an undue hardship on the conduct of its business. In determining the extent of its accommodation obligations, the City may consider, among other factors, business necessity and financial costs and/or other expenditures. 3. Compensation Administration. In offering employment or promotion to Veterans of the Vietnam Era, qualified disabled veterans, and individuals with disabilities, the City will not reduce the amount of compensation offered because of any disability income, pension, or other benefit the individual receives from another source. 4. Specific Procedural Matters (a) Invitation to Self -Identify. The City will establish a procedure inviting all applicants and employees who believe themselves covered under Section 402 of the Vietnam Era Veterans' Readjustment Assistance Act and Section 503 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and who wish to be considered under the City's EEO/Affirmative Action Program, to identify themselves. (b) Personnel Recruitment. Procedures exist for dissemination of job vacancy announcements to educational, government and community organizations. These organizations, which include the State Employment Department, the Veterans Administration and the Department of Rehabilitation, form a reasonably comprehensive recruitment base. The City will continue to evaluate, modify and improve its recruitment efforts as required. PURCHASING PRACTICES It is the intent of the City of La Quinta to continue programs to ensure compliance with all applicable Federal and State requirements imposed requiring non-discrimination in purchasing practices. 000117 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE A. Introductory - All Employees of the City are free to present complaints or grievances relating to job discrimination and shall be guaranteed freedom from coercion, restraint or reprisal action. Except where otherwise provided for by law, any employee shall have the right to present a grievance related to job discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, religion, sex, handicap or age in accordance with the procedures outlined below. An aggrieved employee shall have the right to be accompanied and assisted by a representative of his/her own choosing during any step of grievance procedure. b. Grievance Procedures - The following series of steps provides a progressive procedure designed to resolve grievances at the lowest supervisory level consistent with justice, fair treatment and administrative policy. Step I The employee shall discuss his/her complaint with the immediate supervisor, Personnel & Budget Manager, or Affirmative Action Department Coordinator. If the Personnel & Budget Manager, or Affirmative Action Department Coordinator is contacted by an employee, that individual should notify the aggrieved employee's Supervisor immediately. Within five working days after initiation of the complaint, the immediate supervisor shall give his/her decision verbally to the employee. Step II If the employee and his/her immediate supervisor cannot reach a satisfactory agreement on the complaint, within five working days of the initiation of discussion, the employee may file a written grievance concerning the matter with his Department Director. On a prescribed form furnished departments for this purpose, the employee shall clearly state the basis of the grievance, giving time, place, and other persons involved, and any other pertinent information. The grievance must be filed with the Department Director within ten (10) working days after receipt of the Supervisor's response at Step I. If the employee fails to file the grievance within the prescribed time limits, without waiver, the employee relinquishes his/her right to grieve. If management fails to respond to the prescribed time limits, set out in the grievance procedure, without waiver, the grievance automatically moves to the next step. 000118 Step III Should the aggrieved employee not be satisfied with the answer received from his/her Department Director, he/she may, within five working days after its receipt, file an appeal to the City Manager. The City Manager shall review the matter, investigate, and provide a written answer to the appeal explaining his/her decision or proposed action and reasons therefor. (The City Manager may utilize other City employees or outside resources in assisting his/her review and investigation.) The City Manger's review shall be completed in a reasonable time period consistent with his/her time schedule and time required for investigation. The City Manager's decision shall be final. C. General 1. The Department Director shall allow the employee such time off pay from regular duties as the Department Director determines to be necessary and reasonable for the processing of a grievance. 2. When circumstances warrant, the time limits specified in each step of the grievance procedure may be extended with the written consent of both parties concerned. 3. Failure of the aggrieved employee to file an appeal within the specified time limit for any step of the procedure shall constitute an abandonment of the grievance. 4. Although an aggrieved employee may be assisted by representatives of his/her own choice, he/she must be present personally and participate in the discussions and proceedings. 000119 APPENDIX I Affirmative Action - See Introduction Bona Fide Occupational Qualification - Occupational qualification which is reasonably necessary to the normal operation of a particular function of employment opportunity. Discrimination - Any act, practice or course of conduct constituting or resulting in inequality of treatment of any person on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, age, handicap, or other non -merit factors. Equal Employment Opportunity - Equal opportunity for all persons regardless of their race, color, religion, national origin, sex,age or handicap in all matters relating to employment. Goals - Percentage increase in ethnic minority and female employment by occupational category, which City aims to achieve in correcting its identified underutilization. Objectives - The plans, programs, and procedures anticipated and/or implemented to achieve equal employment opportunity goals. Oral Board - Board of individuals which interviews and rates applicants on the basis of their qualifications for a specific classification. Parity - Goal achieved when percentage of ethnic minorities and women in City force in all job categories equals the percentages of ethnic minorities and women in the Work Force. Person with Disability - Any person who has a (1) physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more major life activities (caring for one's self, performing manual tasks, walking, seeing, hearing, speaking, breathing, learning or working); or (2) has a record of such an impairment; or (3) is regarded as having such an impairment. Reasonable Accommodation - Affirmative steps to provide employment opportunity for an otherwise qualified applicant or employee, which steps may include (1) changes in physical facilities to improve their use or access by handicapped persons, and (2) actions that may include job and work schedule restructuring, provision of special equipment or devices, and the provision of readers or interpreters. Underutilization - Situation which exists when current City work force does not reflect the percentage of ethnic minorities and/or women as compared to their availability in the pool of potential applicants. oaa:182o a, oc&t,, �l�NtitGV F OF C7 rj COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Resolution Amending the Copy Fee AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC BEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: SUMb4ARY: The current fee schedule established the copy fee as $0.10 per page. This fee does not recover the costs incurred by the City and it is recommended that the fee be increased. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: The increase in fee will assist the City in recovering actual costs for copy services. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution establishing $0.95 as the fee for the for each additional page. Submitted by: Pamela LiCalsi Personnel & Budget Manager Signature APPROVED BY: No. 94- to amend copy fees, first page of each document and $0.15 Approved for submission to City Council: ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000121 '- 0� &uift�G� � s 4 FM OF TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council Pamela LiCalsi, Personnel & Budget Manager January 18, 1994 Copy Fee ISSUE: The current fee for copy services is $0.10 per page as established by Resolution No. 82-37. This fee does not recover the costs incurred for the service. BACKGROUND: In July 1982, Council adopted Resolution No. 82-37 (pertinent sections attached) that establishes "by reference certain schedules of fees, payments, deposits for permits, inspections, application processing and other miscellaneous governmental proprietary services". As part of that schedule, the fee for copy services is $0.10 per page. Staff has researched other cities in the valley and found that there is no fee or commonly applied method of calculating fees. Cost per page ranges from $0.10 to $0.21. Retrieval fees range from $11 to $25 per hour. Any Change to the copy fee impacts only those documents not otherwise regulated. In accordance with Government Code Section 81008, copies of statements and reports filed pursuant to the Political Reform Act must be provided at a charge of not to exceed ten (10) cents per page. When documents to be copied are five (5) years or older, a retrieval fee of S5 per request is authorized in addition to the copy Charge per page. ANALYSIS/FISCAL IMPACTS: Staff has evaluated the time and materials utilized for copy services. Documents are retrieved and copied typically by the Deputy City Clerk I. The average hourly salary for that position is S13.45 (excluding benefits). An average amount of time to retrieve and copy a document is 4 minutes. • Each page costs about $0.05 to copy (including copier and paper costs). COPY CHARGE RETRIEVAL & FIRST COPY Personnel: Position Hourly Rate Hrs. Rea'd Unit Cost Deputy City Clerk 13.35 .067 .901 Materials & Equipment: Description Cost Usage Unit Cost Copier .040 1.0 .040 Paper .004 1.0 .004 Total S0.945 000122 EACH ADDITIONAL COPY Personnel: Position HOUrIV Rate HrS. Re0'tl Unit Cost Deputy Clty Clerk I 13.45 .007 0.10 Material & Equipment: Description cost Usage Unit Cost Copier .040 1.0 •040 Paper .004 1.0 .004 a Total $0.144 Therefore, it is recommended the cost for copy services be charged at a rate of $0.95 for the first page and $0.15 for each additional page. The implementation of this two -tiered copy fee will assist the City in recovering the actual costs for services. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. 94- to amend copy fees establishing $0.95 as the fee for the first page of each document and S0.15 for each additional page. 000123 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, AMENDING THE FEE ESTABLISHED FOR COPY SERVICES WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 82-37, the City Council established a Fee Schedule prescribing the amount of fees, payments, and deposits chargeable for certain permits, inspections, application processing, and other miscellaneous governmental and proprietary services; and WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the costs for copy services and calculated that fee established does not recover the costs for copy services; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DOES HEREBY FIND AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The copy fee is $0.95 for the first page of each document and $0.15 for each additional page. SECTION 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a certified Resolution to be filed in the Office of the City Clerk. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this day of , 1994 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 000124 STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH City Attorney ATTACHMENT 1 RESOLUTION NO. 82-37 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING BY REFERENCE CERTAIN SCHEDULES OF FEES, PAYMENTS, DEPOSITS FOR PERMITS, INSPECTIONS, APPLICATION PROCESSINGS AND OTHER MISCELLANEOUS GOVERNMENTAL AND PROPRI- ETARY SERVICES. The City Council of the City of La Quinta does resolve as follows: SECTION 1. With regard to services and operations which con- tinue to be performed for the City, by personnel, departments or agencies of the County of Riverside, the applicable fees, payments and deposits chargeable in connection with such services and opera- tions shall be the same as are established heretofore, and from time to time in the future, by County ordinances, resolution, rules and regulations, or otherwise, which are applicable for the same or similar services or operations performed in unincorporated areas of the County. SECTION 2. With regard to any other services and operations performed by or for the City of La Quinta not encompassed by Section 1 above, there is hereby adopted by reference the schedule of fees, payments, deposits chargeable for certain permits, inspections, application processings and other miscellaneous governmental and proprietary services, as set forth in Resolution No. 13189 of the City of Palm Springs, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and shall be applied insofar as the same may be made applicable to the services and operations of the City of La Quinta. SECTION 3. With regard to services and operations performed by or for the City of La Quinta and for which the said Resolution incorporated by reference in Section 2 above does not provide a rate for a fee or charge, then in that event the fee or charge applicable under the County schedules referred to in Section 1 above may be applied. In the event none of the said schedules can be made applicable, then the City Manager is authorized to compute a charge or fee, and to make the same applicable, in an amount reasonably necessary and adequate to reimburse the City for the costs to the public of performing the particular service or operation which is involved. APPROVED and ADOPTED this wa `r, ;1i�/ APPROVED AS TO FORM: APPROVED AS TO qCNT rNT: 000125 TY ATTORNEY CITY M AGER r� C '^ Y+C YY L L OMr�H 6G+� w° cc 0 G M G C . p L M r. mO. y Y u 00 L r v ^ O �a :.>� N ..• r V . Y x L 7^ �L1�u yQ� V � C � , L O p C S • .�- � L O O L 4 Y 0 W r W 4 O O PM L. s Y 0 N O uu Y O u MC L 7 UDY�1 i L � r rr 0_ N N S of pe u 7 O. 7 V p u c c L. c Y Y W . Y Y t O L Y S O Ai OV1 OLn YtOOOO S1nNP�N OGPrO lOO Mn%M Otin Y L6 yj O m rN10mNN^� ur V O ^ N M1 n O N Y Y 4 < • cm O c u u � Y L Y N s or- Y Y L C id me Y V= 2 3 < W Y } M M L Y 1 CO v 0 0 ^ S N O V r N Y .�. Y Y , d G G M N Y P 7 O O. O _O , M ^ N^ r Y J Y01 L, Y u 1 „q r L, Y r.G 7N m U.Lc 0U 01 , Y 6 O L< Z r 0 0 Y �+ o O M �• N GY :. 6 L a ` ��{{11 ��pp 88 pppp yy Y a AN IUYU�aw:�D. �U x gJ[V V_ W^Y Nis I CL } Y N 1A OMUU, A ��.^.r. Cam/ , F r, M O L_ �. V V U O$ L GV V N i1 �Y^ Y^�.^�• ?1 C �NNN s40 s �= oesz u z 4121 R I�ais J a 8 a A L-1 • nnnt()n 1. ] Tia, 4 a vCF`�l OF COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Consideration of Request for Financial Assistance from Coachella Youth, Incorporated AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: 13_ CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: On October 19, 1993, the City Council reviewed correspondence from the Coachella Valley Youth, Inc. This correspondence is provided as Attachment A. Pursuant to the direction of the City Council, two letters of correspondence were forwarded to Coachella Valley Youth, Inc. requesting the specific amount of financial support their organization is requesting. These letters are provided as Attachments B and C. In response to the City inquiry, the City received correspondence dated December 14, 1993 identifying the specific request for funding in the amount of $1000 (Attachment D). Should the Council deem it appropriate to provide the financial support identified in the request, it is recommended the special projects contingency account of the Legislative Division be utilized. This line item in the 1993/94 budget has a balance remaining of approximately $5,800. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: contingency account in Staff recommends this pursuant to the request The estimated balance in the Legislative Division is line item be utilized should of the Coachella Valley Youth, BY: regarding request for Inc. APPROVED RECOMMENDATION: Direct staff, as deemed appropriate, financial assistance for the Coachella Valley Youth, Submitted by: Thomas P. Genovese Assistant City Manager Signature the special projects approximately $5,800. funding be provided Inc. Approved for submission to City Council: I' (,'(,fry' � l U.R.•-t I ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000127 ATTACHMENT A COACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH, INC. P.O. Box 10285 Palm Desert, CA 92255-0285 September 9, 1993 lion. John Pena La Quinta City Council La Quinta, California Dear Mayor Pena: Coachella Valley Youth, Inc. is a nonprofit community -based anti -delinquency organization which combats gangs and substance abuse by directly involving local young people in community service projects, such as graffiti abatement and neighborhood clean up, educational programs, and recreational activities. By providing positive alternatives to delinquent behavior and through offering enriching personal experiences to the adolescents we serve, we seek to enhance their self-esteem and to instill them with healthy- values. Coachella Valley Youth, Inc, pursues these goals with a culturally sensitive approach, attracting participation from both at -risk and mainstream teenagers. Seeking your financial support, this letter comes to you because you have through the years demonstrated a commitment to the community. Because our directors and staff members are volunteers, all of your fully tax- deductible donation goes directly to the local fight against gangs and drugs. Please take the time to write out a check. Should you have any questions or concerns regarding the organization or its activities, please contact the undersigned. Thanks very much. Sincerely, Lana R. Crescimano-Lee, President While every donation, however modest, is important to us as another voice of support, we are pleased to recognize those of one hundred dollars or more with a handsome "Community Service Award" certificate. Tax IDS! 33-0474262 000128 ATTACHMENT B Tiht 4 4a Qum& 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 777-7000 FAX (619) 777-7101 October 26, 1993 Ms. Lisa Crescimano-Lee, President Coachella Valley Youth, Inc. P.O. Box 10285 Palm Desert, CA 92255-0285 Dear Ms. Crescimano-Lee: The City of La Quinta is in receipt of your correspondence dated September 9, 1993 requesting financial assistance to your organization. The purpose of this correspondence is to identify specifically the amount of financial support your agency is requesting from the City of La Quinta. At your earliest convenience, please contact me regarding the specific amount your agency is requesting. Upon receipt of this information, the City staff will schedule your request to be considered by the La Quinta City Council. Thank you for your assistance with this matter at 777-7100. Sincerely, Thomas P. Genovese Assistant City Manager TPG:kb cc: City Council City Manager Administrative Services You may contact me 000129 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 ATTACHMENT C T4ht 4 4a Q" 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 777-7000 FAX (619) 777-7101 November 24, 1993 Ms. Lisa Crescimano-Lee, President Coachella Valley Youth, Inc. P.O. Box 10285 Palm Desert, CA 92255-0285 Dear Ms. Crescimano-Lee: The City of La Quinta sent correspondence to you on October 26, 1993 regarding your letter dated September 9th requesting financial assistance for your organization. The City's correspondence outlined our request to identify specifically the amount of financial support your agency is requesting from the City of La Quinta. , Please contact me regarding your Agency's request at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your assistance with this matter, you may contact me at 777-7100. Sincerely, Thomas P. Genovese Assistant City Manager TPG:kb cc: City Council City Manager Administrative Services Mcv.yth 00,9130 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 #- * ATTACHMENT D COACHELLA VALLEY YOUTH, INC. DEC 1 5 P.O. Box 10285 Palm Desert, CA 92255-0285 December 14, 1993 Thomas P. Genovese Assistant City Manager P.O. Box 1504 LA Quinta, CA 92253 Dear Mr. Genovese: Our President, Lisa Crescimano-Lee, passed your correspondence along to me. I apologize for the delay involved. We propose to expand our activities to involve more of La Quinta's young people in community service, recreation and educational programming. While we are particularly focused on graffiti abatement, the costliest aspects of our program relate to the recreational outings we use to reward the young people who have volunteered to fight gangs and drugs in general and graffiti in particular. This is a request for funding from the City of La Quinta in the amount of one thousand dollars. These monies would go directly to the fight against gangs and drugs in La Quinta. Because Mayor Pena has some familiarity with this organization, I've spared some detail. I will gladly provide, however, any additional information or documentation that is needed. Thank you in advance for your consideration. 9 p ctfully, e eat Program Director Tax ID# 33-0474262 0,00131 � T F � Z C�y0FTN�O COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Contract Change Order No. 3 for Whitewater/Washington Street Bridge - Revision of Channel Lining SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION:_ CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Discovery of a sewer line obstructing CVWD-required channel lining improvements caused a 12-day construction contract delay and resulted in revisions in the nature and scope of work on the Whitewater/Washington Street bridge project. Granite Construction incurred extra costs due to the delay and to the redesign of the improvements. The net increase in the construction contract cost is $39,716.99. Staff anticipates reimbursements of 50 % of this cost from Measure A/TUMF and 21.57% from State S.B. 300 funds. This will result in a total impact on RDA funds of $11,291.54. Granite has also asked for a 12-day increase in contract time to compensate for the delay. The attached memo provides details of this change order. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: This Change Order will result in $11,291.54 in additional expenditures from the RDA Construction account for this project. The fund has adequate contingency funds for the additional expense. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Construction Contract Change Order No. 3 for the Whitewater/Washington Street bridge. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: hktd - lkkG;� Robert L. Hunt City Manager 000132 FB/fb T4ht 44QuurW MEMORANDUM TO: Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: David M. Cosper Public Works Director/City Engineer DATE: January 18, 1994 SUBJECT: Contract Change Order No. 3 - Whitewater/Washington Street Bridge ISSUE: During construction of channel -lining improvements required by the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD), the City's contractor on the bridge project discovered a sewer line which obstructed installation of the channel -lining. Granite incurred substantial extra costs because of the resulting contract delay and revisions in the nature and scope of work. To minimize contract -delay costs which were accruing at $1,100 per work day, staff authorized immediate redesign of the improvements and the resumption of construction by Granite Construction. BACKGROUND: As a condition of the City's encroachment permit to construct and operate the Washington Street bridge in the Whitewater/River Channel, CVWD added a late requirement that we line the channel slopes with concrete pavement. The City first learned of the requirement after the bridge project was advertised for bidding. Our design engineer, Daniel, Mann, Johnson, & Mendenhall (DMJM), designed the lining and sent out a contract addendum prior to the bid opening date. The lining was designed to extend to the limits of the Washington Street right of way on the east and west sides of the bridge. The work was listed under three bid items, increasing quantities of "Structure Excavation" and "Structure Backfill" and adding a new lump -sum bid item "Slope Paving" for construction of the lining and of cut-off walls at the termini of the lining. In constructing the channel lining west of the bridge, Granite Construction discovered a CVWD sewer main that obstructed the channel lining on both the north and south channel slopes. While CVWD studied the problem, Granite was forced to stop work. CVWD decided to eliminate the channel lining in the area of the sewer main and to terminate the lining under the bridge. The City's design engineer redesigned the lining in accordance 000133 with CVWD's requirements. The contractor was able to resume construction after a delay of 12 calendar days. Though the redesign shortened the total length of channel lining, termination of the cutoff walls at the bridge required a more elaborate and costly design to minimize turbulence under the bridge. In addition, the contractor incurred costs in performing the aborted portion of the work near the sewer line and in restoring that area to an acceptable condition. There were no bid items applicable to these costs and it was necessary to negotiate them as extra -work items. The original channel lining and cutoff walls were bid as a single lump -sum item. The redesigned channel lining and cutoff walls were substantially changed from the original plan. It was necessary, then, that this work also be paid as an extra -work item. Contract Change Order No. 3 addresses only the delay and additional costs to our construction contract with Granite Construction. A copy of the Change Order is included as Attachment A with this memo. Staff anticipates a change order in our engineering services contract with DMJM for design and construction management services associated with the modified channel lining. At this time, staff has not determined these costs. ANALYSIS/FISCAL IMPACT: Additional costs submitted by the contractor were as follows: Delay Overhead $10,210.80 Cutoff Wall 17,393.18 Channel Excavation 31,113.73 Excavation Rip Rap 8,224.02 Slope Paving 67,822.43 Rebar 17,512.53 Structure Backfill 2,161.16 Channel Backfill 3,779.79 Rai Rao Backfill 5,556.45 Total Increase: $163,774.09 The increase is offset by deletion of original slope lining bid items as follows: Structure Excavation $21,935.10 Structure Backfill 3,212.00 Slope Paving 98,910.00 Total Deletion: 5(124,057.10) Cost of Contract Change Order No. 3: $39,716.99 Or) 0134 The City's Construction Manager, Tom Berg and Associates, Inc., and City staff have reviewed the contractor's documentation for costs associated with this change order and find the costs to be fair and justified. The RDA Annual Budget groups construction and construction management services under a single line item in the account for this project. The effect of this change order on that line item is as follows: Budgeted Amount for Construction and Construction Management: $2,473,735.00 Original Construction/CM Contract Amounts: $2,345,540.00 Previously -Approved Change Orders: 8,316.00 This Change Order 39,716.99 Revised Total: ($2 383.362.191 Unencumbered Contingency: $80,162.01 Staff anticipates that Measure A/TUMF funds and State S.B. 300 funds will reimburse 71 .57% of the cost of the change order. The net cost to the RDA Construction account for this project will be $1 1, 291 .54. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council approve Construction Contract Change Order No. 3 for the Whitewater/Washington Street bridge. FB/fb 000135 .! . Attachment A Tw�v 4 4aQ,uirw COPY CONTRACT: WHITEWATER/WASHINGTON STREET BRIDGE CONTRACTOR: GRANITE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY P.O. BOX 9011 PALM DESERT, CA 92255 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 03 Sheet 1 of 5 PROJECT No. 92-3 -kkii Pursuant to the terms of the Contract, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, conditions, and provisions of the original contract . . . . . . ............ . i-'-a--uw�-,_•�a_�a-� • y I' • Z • Y__L1 w Due to differing site conditions, specifically the discovery of an undocumented CVWD sewer force main that interfered with original contract channel paving operations which significantly changed the character of remaining slope paving work, the Contractor is hereby directed to proceed with revised limits of work. Compensation to be based on force accounting methods per contract specifications (see sheets 4 of 5 and 5 of 5). This contract change order shall delete Bid Items Nos. 30, 32, and 46 and shall allow for compensation of delays incurred which were beyond the Contractor's control, and allow for any restocking charges for materials that were not used due to the revised scope of work. Contractor's extra work Delete portion of Bid Item No. 30 (Structure Exc. Channel) Delete Bid Item No. 32 ( Structure Backfill Channel) Delete Bid Item No. 46 (Slope Paving Concrete) Net Total $163,774.09 <21,935.10> <3,212.00> <98,910.00> $39,716.99 OW1--ici Previous Contract Amt through Change Order No. 2 $ 2,099,180.01 Add this Change Order $ 39,716.99 Revised Contract Total $ 2,138,897.00 By reason of this order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: _2 calendar days added to contract time. Previous Contract Completion Date: 5/12/9C New Contract Completion Date: 5/24/94. -kki--kkf=hf=kkivE�kkf�kkkkkl�-f��i��-i-kl�a�: Submitted By: Date Approved By. Date: a i We, the undersigned Con r, have given to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we noted above, an all services necessary for the work above sped6ed, VMderation will provide all equipmen t the alls and will accept as full maybe perform /►f �i� Accepted By: Title: _ % — �`f-- Contractor. Date: COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Contract Change Order 92-1-02 for Installation of Curb and Gutter Within Phase V Improvements SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: At the direction of the City Council, staff has concluded negotiations with Kenko, Inc. for installation of curbs and gutter, additional street width, etc. as designed by Kicak & Associates. These negotiations provided for no increase in existing unit prices of bid items. The contractor has requested a contract extension of 70 calendar days to the existing contract in order to complete this additional work. The anticipated completion date is now October 1994. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: This project will be funded through a commercial bank loan. It is anticipated that the loan will be secured by mid -February. The majority of the contract costs will not be needed until the last three months of the contract (August, September, October, 1994). RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of contract change order 92-1-02 in the amount of $1,320,069 including a contract extension of 70 calendar days, and authorize staff to execute contract change orders with; Tri Lake Consultants ($43,200 inspection), P.S.I. ($13,200 testing), Kicak & Associates ($20,000 engineering services). Submitted by: JMF/ld Approved for Submission to City Council: kr 1. &I4 l Robert L. Hunt, City Manager 000137 FROM: DATE: Twivl 4 4u'Qui"fw MEMORANDUM Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council David M. Cosper, Public Works Director January 18, 1994 SUBJECT: Approval of Contract Change Order 92-1-02 for Installation of Curb & Gutter Within Phase V Improvements ISSUE: Acceptance of contract change order (Attachment A) to increase Assessment District 92-1 scope of work to include curb and gutter and associated improvements in sub -areas 2, 3, 4 and 6 (Project Map, Attachment B) and to increase scope of work for construction support professional services (i.e. testing, inspection, engineering). BACKGROUND: Original scope of work in Assessment District 92-1 included complete street improvements in sub- areas 1, 5, 7 and in sub area 2 north of Montezuma. At the direction of the City Council, staff has completed negotiations with the "prime contractor", Kenko, Inc. to include full improvements in all remaining sub -areas including a time extension to the contract of 70 calendar days. ANALYSIS/FISCAL IMPACT: During negotiations staff was successful in maintaining no increase in existing unit prices from bid items which increased in quantity even though there are scheduled increases in labor and certain materials at mid -year. These additional contract change order (C.C.O.) costs will require the securing of a loan from a commercial lending institution. A breakdown of all associated costs is as follows: Construction $1, 320,069 Inspection 43,200 Testing 13,200 Engineering 20,000 Sub Total 1,396,469 10% Contingency * 139,647 Total $1,536,116 * Note: This contingency is not part of the Contract award to the low bidder. It will only be used if needed, such as the case where field conditions differ from approved plans. p 3 p 13 8 RECOMMENDATION: Recommend approval of contract change order 92-1-02 in the amount of $1,320,069, including a contract extension of 70 calendar days, and authorize staff to execute contract change orders with; Tri Lake Consultants ($43,200 inspection), P.S.I. ($13,200 testing), Kicak & Associates ($20,000 engineering services). /ld Attachments: Contract Change Order Project Area Map 000139 ATTACBM M A Z 4 AV yA.- OF CNt CONTRACT: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 92-1 CONTRACTOR: KENKO, INC. P.O. BOX 831 CALIMESA, CA 92320 CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER NO. 02 Sheet 1 of 3 PROJECT NO. 92-1 Pursuant to the terms of the Contract, you are hereby directed to make the herein described changes or do the following described work not included in the plans and specifications for this Contract. Unless otherwise stated all work shall conform to the terms, conditions, and provisions of the original contract. 444ifiii44fi444fifii44fifi44Mfii44fifii44fiii44fiii4fifii444fiii#rt444444fi4444fifiT44fiii44fi4ii4444ii444fi4444iM44irtt4fii444rtiii444i44444rtfifi4 DESCRIPTION OF CHANGE: Furnish and install in place complete, including but not limited to, all labor, equipment and materials to construct street improvements as shown on contract drawings, sheets 1 through 26. Compensation shall be per bid schedule (Exhibit "A") attached, and by field verified installed quantities. The stun of all unit prices extended on this contract change order not to exceed $1,320,069 sss*s*ss#*ssi**ss**ssii*siss**i*ssi**ssss*sss***ss**ss****ss*s*ssss**s****sss#s*sss**ssss***ss**ss*****ss*** Previous Contract Amt. through Change Order No. 1 $ 5,287,343.00 Add this Change Order $ 1,320,069.00 Revised Contract Total $ 6,607,412.00 By reason of this order the time of completion will be adjusted as follows: 70 calendar days added to contract time. Previous number of days allowed 320. Revised number of contract days allowed 390. Revised completion date: 10/22/94. i4rtrtfi4444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444444rt444irtrtfifi44#rtfifii44rtfi4fi4rtrtrt4fi444rtfi444rtrtfifi444rtrtfi4444rtfifi/444rtfii Submitted Approved By: 44444444444444444rt444rtrtrt44rtrt44i4rtrt4rtrtrt444444444rt44444444444►4rtrt44irt4rtrt44rtrtrt44444rt4rtrt44rt444rt4rt444444fifi4i44rtfifii44rtfiifi4444i We, the undersigned Contractor, have given careful consideration to the change proposed and hereby agree, if this proposal is approved, that we will provide all equipment, furnish all materials, except as may be noted above, and perform all services necessary for the work above specified, and will accept as full payment the prices shown above. Accepted By: Title: Contractor: (100140 ffiIBIT A R �I LL LL O ~ W w U W H 8 d s► d d tl! 888t�8a to chi t70 t70 tl! 8 8 O M M Op O tV ^ H 4 m to N d► O n .= C1 N to co O t0 N 8 0 a� � th tl! 8 O C7 0 p 0 0 y 0 It 0 Le � 8 to I- c •' A 8 O w ar► 8 � 8 LO to n „ 0 m m 8 pp O to P 8 to O O M A 8 8 8 8 g 8 N 8 8 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 8 W (� n ItN Ln C6 O N •- N M O tWC .- n N n N tW0 n a_ a q m ar w m �► +n m w `� `�' r► a z �► J U z O U U z Q cc Q W i1 O Lu Cc mLL a cc W zi = z IE I U QO cc Z0 F-ZOO ao u§ro (A c �U LL O z C �cp M N t cc O U y O 0 .. C Q C °� C U m tL > 0 m L) (aO U C c 3 � y o� LL Z $ 0 z LL _ 3 F- Z otf LL ca W U_ C 0 v tom W p U) m F j C A C �o O p O tl =� 0 c 0 O O O ~ 0 c m m c ° ° LL S Lr F- F- F- O F- to t Vj Ly #A C N C LL LC LL J J F- F- to to rn }} 01 W 00 I t� N a tn0 Z To L7 .N- N N yd W U c U Z 0 Z O z m O O w 0 U o ca 0 m F- c • 0 z p 0= F- U O Z at! to _o0 to O LL y _ m O tL oa > V) � = o F- .� C o z �s N RI C O to m N U Z � Q m O ir c m � 10 = o F- a U to J W W 0 J to J W W lL co On .- C) N N co L"1'01 O th O It mt0 O E O N E CL A HCL C ~ > to d 2 o C Q W m m 0 E CL ` 7 c; O > to V Z A V1 O Z O O V• rz N r •= Y N a cc ot1 oa C m o' C O` Q m 0 m t W 7 U. m �+ O .N- L'7 ; m C lL m Q V U G ° j w 0 m U to ttl V U 0 U C C O y ° 0 � M N Y t) N N O co C y p m Q cl Q U U Q U cc Q S 0 cr to 5 W J 5 to o cc F- 0 v m Ln W O N tlf t0 r% 00 M N N M tm CV) Z V1 0 rn N V1 N N to to N y to N N N In to 000141 m F >. 'a 0 0 0 m o 0 0 m 0 cc O M cc c 'o v m y v -a m o U U m U Um Uo U°UZ m Um mE 0M 0 0 C-) 00Lo N 00 M CA 00 C m W a N N > y >N N �, N >N N N >' O m •Q m CO O > m O >. > >td a G O 0 O 0 cc 0 O 0 a m m =� m m m � m m m O m m m m m c c C 10 O c c c c C m C a W LO m m p m m m m m m m ip Ci N O U U U m m U O U U U O O O D U cp 0 m V- N r- N cM n � Ln N N N m O W V N y > N O N >• N > N > N N >• m ++ O m N 'v >. m y >. m m F- m o m 0 m o �. m m F- .3 SO. CIO,o rm —Oa o c a 0 C m m m m m m m c m y c c c c cm o 0 0 0 o a o c a� �o U U U U U cis .0 U p U LA n n 0 V N o U N (D r• N W U m c m L L N U � N m m 'o O 3 o a 0 4-0 U m ° C7 m v o a m w m � 0_ W m c m d C a C L`L I U N d in (D 3 w 4-04-0 m m C a`+ m y C C O m N m U p N 4Y E ao U Q ) U o c (D = Q U m C N m U O 'o 11 N m 0 U 0 p y V ++ ` (AU O N _m m L U N -it n 00 rn 0 N m Ln Ln Lo n r 00 00 Y CD O Q m Lo m d co p N Z Q • 00014? � 11111ti11111 i rftlf�rr���r � illllllli111 � 111111111111 Aw111111 I ',ffllll 111111111111 111111111 1 COUNCIL MEETING DATE ITEM TITLE: JANUARY•18, 1994 �l �tr!'tACtJ AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: TRANSMITTAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT STUDY SESSION: Transmital of November 30, 1993 Treasurer's Report. I certify that this report accurately reflects all pooled investments and is in compliance with California Government Code Section 53645 as amended 1/1/86; and is in conformity with City Code 3.08.010 to 3.08.070 Investment of Moneys and Funds. I hereby certify that next sufficienvmonthns estimated expenditurested revenues are avail )`I'dgi Date Robert L. Hunt City Manager RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File Approved for submission to Submitted by: City Council ROBERT L. HUNT ignature CITY MANAGER 000144 n CITY OF LA QUINTA TREASURER'S REPORT ROVBNBER 30, 1993 ASSETS UNDER THE INVBSTNENT DIRECTION OF THE CITY TREASURER. TYPE OF MATURITY INTEREST INVESTMENT INSTITUTUION DATE RATE AMOUNT ------ RANK ---- .......... POOLED CASH CHECKING ......... BANK OF AMBRICA ........ N/A ........ N/A 115,115 1 MONEY MARKET BANK OF AMBRICA N/A 2.41 357,615 1 LAIF/98-33-434 STATE OF CALIF. DEMAND 4.365 6,766,041 N/A LAIF/65-33-017 STATE OF CALIF. DEMAND 4.365 31293,014 N/A $10,532,085 CITY PETTY CASH N/A N/A N/A 1,000 1 MONEY MARKET BANK OF THE DESERT N/A N/A 9,167 1 DEFERRED CON? ICMA DBNAND 1.9 AVG INT 171,343 2 $181,510 RDA RESTRICTED CASH BANK OF AMBRICA RESTRICTED 2.22 1,483,539 2 1ST INTERSTATE RESTRICTED 2.28 1,792,364 CONSTRUCTION 1ST INTERSTATE MAID 2.28 3,605,632 2 1ST INTBRSTATB DBNAND 2.28 231,885 2 $7,113,420 ------------- TOTAL $ 17,827,015 ------------- ------------- $17,827,015 ------------ ------------ DISTRIBUTION OF CASH AND INVESTMENTS CITY GENERAL FUND GAS TAX FUND PARKS AND RECREATION FUND QUIMBY FUND INFRASTRUCTURE FUND VILLAGE PARKING FUND ASSESSMENT DIST FUNDS TRUST AND AGENCY FUNDS RDA CAPITAL INPROVENBNT FUNDS DEBT SERVICE FUNDS LOW/NOD FUNDS PA 11 PA 12 $2,699,998 $3,902,715 (21494,162) 2,094,948 31403,819 915,267 13,609,355 $6,912,930 ($11304,174) (56,872) 1,212,962 645,329 2,407,763 26,166 2,976,715 1,396,241 $7,304,730 $10,522,285 $17,827,015 $17,827,015 00014 I LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY TREASURER'S REPORT NOVEMBER 30, 1993 ASSETS UNDER THE INVESTMENT DIRECTION OF THE FINANCING AUTHORITY TREASURER. TYPE OF MATURITY INTEREST INVESTMENT ---------- INSTITUTUION ------------ DATE -------- RATE -------- AMOUNT ------ RANK ---- CIVIC CENTER BOND PROCEEDS: CASH - CONSTRUCTION BANK OF AMERICA DEMAND 2.16 $2,172 2 CASH - RESERVE BANK OF AMERICA DEMAND 2.16 746,932 2 CASH - REDEMPTION BANK OF AMERICA DEMAND 2.16 46,781 ------------ 2 TOTAL $795,885 000146 COUNCIL MEETING DATE ITEM TITLE: JANUARY 18, 1994 Demand Register - JANUARY 4, 1994 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: 17191-17196,17271-172811 127,779.35 P/R 9446 - 95071 $56,258.50 Payable Warrants: 17283 - 173911 $1,595,803.59 $1,779,841.44 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash - City $328,936.77 RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Demand Register Submitted by: Signature AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: CITY DEMANDS RDA. DEMANDS APPROVED BY: Approved for submission to City Council ROBERT L. HUNT CITY MANAGER $328,936.77 $1,450,904.67 $1,779,841.44 000147 GL24U412/28/93 WARRANT RE G I S TE R PAGE 1 DATE OF WARRANT IN FAVOR OF CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION ISSUE NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 12/14/93 17191* BANGERTER, MICHAEL 51,030.00 51,030.00 REF PARTIAL SECURITY DEP 12/14/93 17192* CVMACC SUPERVISORS BFK 35.00 35.00 CVMACC SUPERVISORS BRKFST 12/15/93 17194* PETTY CASH 482.83 482.83 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 358.66 358.66 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 12/15/93 17195* PETTY CASH 24.38 ENGINE STAND RENTAL 12/21/93 17196* A-1 RENTS 49.38 25.00 ENGINE HOIST RENTAL 12/16/93 17271* RIVERSIDE COUNTY EMP. 9,756.50 9,756.50 EMP CREDIT UN DED 12/17 12/21/93 17272* CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 2,881.40 2,881.40 SWT P/R 12/17/93 13,638.29 PERS P/R 12/17/93 12/21/93 17273* P.E.R.S. 13,589.72 51.43 SUR BNFT 12/17/93 12/21/93 17274* ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 1,962.50 1,962.50 DEF COMP 12/17/93 12/21/93 17275* UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 48.00 48.00 EMP CONTRIB 12/17/93 12/21/93 17276* SPRING MNT ESCROW TRUST 4,729.36 4,729.36 BBC N10444MB/LOT 9 BLK165 12/21/93 17277* COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 1,100.00 1,100.00 FIRE HYDRANT WATER METER 12/22/93 17278* T D DESERT DEVELOPMENT 760.00 760.00 REF PRECISE PLAN APP FEE 12/22/93 17279* DIXIE ESCROW 359.00 359.00 CPRS CONF/HOTEL REGISTRA 12/22/93 17280* CAL. PARK/REC. SOCIETY 537.00 537.00 CPRS CONF REGISTRATION 12/22/93 17281* DIXIE ESCROW 40,000.00 40,000.00 LANDMARK/WILLIAMS PURCH 12/28/93 17283 A AND S COFFEE SERVICES 298.00 298.00 COFFEE SUPPLIES 12/28/93 17284 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 453.24 453.24 2739 HELIUM/CHAIRS/SKIRTING 307.52 TRACTOR RENTAL 24.44 ENGINE STAND 12/28/93 17285 A-1 RENTS 356.96 25.00 ENGINE HOIST 12/28/93 17286 ACE ALTERNATOR 171.26 171.26 BATTERY/FLASHER 47.59 HOSE/PLIERS/KEYS 12/26/93 17287 ACE HARDWARE 55.11 7.52 SHOP TOWELS 82.43 MEMO FORMS 12/28/93 17288 ARROW PRINTING COMPANY 303.05 220.62 ENCROACHMNT PERMIT APP 12/28/93 17289 ATCO MANUFACTURING CO 347.00 347.00 DEGREASER 12/28/93 17290 BAKER, PEGGY 40.00 40.00 SNR CTR MUSIC DIRECTOR 12/28/93 17291 BANK OF AMERICA 91,890.12 91,890.12 KENKO CONST ESC 8952-031 12/28/93 17292 BANK OF AMERICA N T C 3,519.00 3,519.00 ADMIN/REVENUE BONDS 1991 53.16- CREDIT/FAN CLUTCH 53.16- RETURNED BATTERY 149.99 FILTER STOCK 32.33- CORE CREDIT 29.90 OIL STOCK/AIR FILTER 7.10 GRINDING WHEEL 16.36 TRUCK PARTS 50.42 FUEL PUMP 1,540.60 ENGINE REBUILD/TRACTOR 12/28/93 17293 BIG A AUTO PARTS 1,810.52 154.80 TORQUE WRENCH/RING COMP 12/28/93 17294 BOGAN & ASSOC INC, G 241.50 241.50 SNR CTR DANCE INSTRUCTOR 12/28/93 17295 BSI CONSULTANTS INC 8,197.45 8,197.45 PLAN CHECK FEES 12/28/93 17296 C.V.J.P.I.A 495.00 495.00 SMTLFMENT/CROCKETT 12/28/93 17297 CA STREET MAINTENANCE INC 4,638.86 4,638.86 STREET SWEEPING/NOV 12/28/93 17298 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 507.71 507.71 UNIFORMS 12/28/93 17299 CAL ROOFING CO 160.00 160.00 FIRE STA 70 ROOF REPAIRS 12/28/93 17300 CARR S CARR INC 75.41 75.41 EQUIP FUEL 12/28/93 17301 CHANEY COMPANY, GEORGE H. 10,747.59 10,747.59 INSPECTION SERVICES 12/28/93 17302 CHIEF SIGN CRAFTS 269.38 269.38 SIGNS 12/28/93 17303 CLARK, ALTON 150.00 150.00 BOB HOPE CLASSIC FROG AD 112.28 LASER TONER/FILES 12/28/93 17304 COACHELLA VALLEY 153.40 41.12 ADHESIVE/COPY HOLDER 12/28/93 17305 COACHELLA VALLEY LAND 77.05 77.05 CVLP RENTAL PROP MAINT EX GL24U412/28/93 WARRANT RE G I ST ER PAGE 2 DATE OF WARRANT IN FAVOR OF CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION ISSUE NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER . 12/28/93 17306 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 6,556.74 6,556.74 WATER SVC/NOV 12/28/93 17307 COMPACT RADIO TELEPHONE 171.98 171.98 CELLULAR PHONE REPAIRS 12/28/93 17308 COMSERCO 31.25 31.25 ANTENNA 12/28/93 17309 DANNY'S PEST CONTROL 50.00 50.00 PEST CONTROL/DEC 12/28/93 17310 DECRATREND FAINTS 365.00 365.00 PAINT 12/28/93 17311 DESERT FLAGS AND POLES 1,373.08 1,373.08 2735 CITY LOGO FLAGS 12/28/93 17312 DESERT JANITOR SERVICE 2,707.00 2,707.00 JANITORIAL SVC/DEC 12/28/93 17313 DFM ASSOCIATES 35.83 35.83 1994 CA ELECTIONS CODE 12/28/93 17314 DMJM 89,102.07 89,102.07 PROF Svc/WASH BRIDGE 12/28/93 17315 DOUBLE PRINTS 1 HOUR PHOT 92.50 92.58 PHOTOS 12/28/93 17316 DUNPHY, JAMES T 9,658.80 9,658.80 SNR CNTR CONTT/SITEWORK 12/28/93 17317 ECONO SEWER SERVICES 260.00 260.00 PUMP SEPTIC TANKS 12/28/93 17318 EISENHOWER IMMEDIATE CARE 248.00 248.00 EMPLOYEE EXAMINATIONS 12/28/93 17319 FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT 221.00 221.00 YMCA MOVING COSTS/LAMS 12/28/93 17320 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 217.50 217.50 FEDERAL EXPRESS 71.75 TRACTOR MAIN BEARING 11.53 TRACTOR REPAIR PARTS 8.14 TRACTOR TEMP SENDER 12/28/93 17321 GARNER IMPLEMENT 00. 464.41 372.99 TRACTOR STARTER 12/28/93 17322 GENERAL TELEPHONE 70.02 70.02 PHONE SVC/DEC 12/28/93 17323 GEORGES GOODYEAR 20.00 20.00 TIRE REPAIR 12/28/93 17324 GRAINGER, W W 481.98 481.98 2758 PARTS WASHER 71.59 ASPHALT 12/28/93 17325 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION 00 330,042.21 329,970.62 CONSTRUCTION 12/28/93 17326 HEGGE ELECTRIC 360.00 360.00 ADD 2 YARD LIGHTS 105.37 FERTILIZER 37.19 IRRIG PARTS 296.31 FERTILIZER 30.27 IRRIG REP/FRITZ BURNS PRK 12/28/93 17327 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 520.42 51.28 IRRIG CONTROLLER REP 36.58 COUNCIL NAME PLATES 12/28/93 17328 HOLMAN INDUSTRIES 49.43 12.85 COUNCIL NAME PLATE 12/26/93 17329 I.A.P.M.O. 50.00 50.00 IAPMO DUES 75.00 75.00 ICBO DUES 12/28/93 17330 ICBO 87.71 ELEC SVC/NOV 7.20 ELEC SVC/OCT 8.88 ELEC SVC/NOV 30.60 ELEC SVC/OCT 6,522.15 ELEC SVC/NOV 23.85 ELEC SVC/OCT 12/28/93 17331 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST. 7,215.14 534.75 ELEC SVC/NOV 12/28/93 17332 J T DISTRIBUTING 105.70 105.70 ASPHALT PATCH 12/28/93 17333 JP REPROGRAPHICS 1,231.99 1,231.99 PROF SVC/BLUEPRINTS 12/28/93 17334 JUBILEE POOL 8 SPA CARE 95.00 95.00 FOUNTAIN MAINT 12/28/93 17335 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES 683.81 683.81 CONTRACT LABOR 571,048.70 CONTRACTOR ST IMP/92-1 66,919.77- ESCROW FUNDS 347,852.50 CONTRACTOR ST IMP/92-1 12/28/93 17336 KENKO INC 827,011.08 24,970.35- ESCROW FUNDS 12/28/93 17337 KENS AUTO REPAIR 35.85 35.85 REPLACE BELT 12/28/93 17338 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES 2,454.29 2,454.29 PROF SVC/ENGINEERING 12/28/93 17339 LIEBERT CASSIDY FRIERSON 2,500.00 2,500.00 CVERC MEMBERSHIP 1,849.85 1,849.85 VANDALIZED LIGHTING REP 12/20/93 17340 LIGHT SOURCE 12/28/93 17341 LOCK SHOP INC, THE 23.06 23.06 KEYS 12/28/93 17342 LOS ANGELES TIMES 15.54 15.54 LA TIMES SUBSCRIP GL24U4 12/28/93 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 DATE OF WARRANT IN FAVOR OF CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION ISSUE NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 14.55 PHOTOS 53.88 FILM 12/28/93 17343 M R CAMERA & PHOTO 126.62 58.19 PHOTOS 12/28/93 17344 MALONEY INC, T I 1,327.00 1,327.00 PROF SVC/PALM ROYAL PARR 12/28/93 17345 MENTONE TURF SUPPLY 10,812.46 10,812.46 LANDSCAPE 12/28/93 17346 METROMEDIA PAGING SERVICE 28.97 28.97 VOICE PAGER 12/28/93 17347 MICHIGAN REC & PARK ASSOC 90.00 90.00 MICHIGAN REC & PARR DUES 12/28/93 17348 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 289.07 289.07 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 12/28/93 17349 MOTIVATIONAL SYSTEMS INC 475.00 475.00 NAME PLATES 12/28/93 17350 MOTOROLA INC. 966.75 966.75 REPEATER & MAINT 12/28/93 17351 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 3,329.73 3,329.73 ASSMNT DIST ADMINISTRATH 26.00 KATL NOTARY ASSN DUES 12/28/93 17352 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSN 124.00 98.00 NATL NOTARY SEMINAR 12/28/93 17353 NOEL BRUSH AWARDS 27.35 27.35 EOM PLAQUE 12/28/93 17354 NORRELL SERV INC 1,211.28 1,211.28 CONTRACT LABOR 117.11 MOWER BLADES 12/28/93 17355 PACIFIC EQUIP IRRIGATION 126.05 8.94 IGNITION SWITCH 12/28/93 17356 PALM DESERT COUNTRY CLUB 50.00 50.00 REC HALL RNT/SNR CTR CLSB 12/28/93 17357 PC TROUBLESHOOTER 160.00 160.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 45.79 BUSINESS CARDS/HARTUNG 12/28/93 17358 PRINTING PLACE, THE 91.58 45.79 6824 BUSINESS CARDS/CHANEY 1,B38.00 PNOF SVC/ASSMNT DIST STRM 108.00 PROF SVC/ASSMNT DIST WATR 2,036.00 PROF SVC/ASSMNT DIST SEWN 702.00 PROF SVC/ASSMNT DIST STS 12/28/93 17359 PROF SERVICE INDUSTRIES 5,637.00 953.00 PROF SVC/ASSMNT DIST STRM 12/20/93 17360 PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS 38.92 38.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 12/28/93 17361 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 42.89 42.89 COPIER REPAIR 12/28/93 17362 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 3,864.00 3,864.00 BOOKING FEES/OCT 12/28/93 17363 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF 475.00 475.00 ANIMAL SHELTER SVC 832.15 PROF SVC/PLAN CHECK 12/28/93 17364 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF 1,254.17 422.02 PROF SVC/INSPECTION 833.57 PROF SVC/HOUSING PROD 32.50 PROF SVC/HOUSING PLAN 50.00 PROF SVC/TDC DEV 3,123.97 PROF SVC/IMPLEMENTATION 1,301.00 PROP Svc/STOCKMAN DEV 950.00 PROF SVC/LQ CNYN CTR 14,185.85 PROF SVC/WILLIAKS DEV 100.00 PROP SVC/COUNTY LITIGATN 12/26/93 17365 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP 20,676.89 100.00 PROF SVC/BUDGET/ACCTNG 12/28/93 17366 RUBINO, MICHAEL J. 803.25 803.25 LEGAL SVC/YBARRA 12/28/93 17367 RUTAN B TUCKER 6,029.20 6,029.20 LEGAL SVC/BELLANCA 12/28/93 17368 S.C.A.C.E.O. 25.00 25.00 SCACEO SUBSCRIP 12/28/93 17369 SIERRA PACIFIC ELEC CONT 73,368.18 73,368.18 CONSTRUCTION/SIGNALS 12/28/93 17370 SMOLENS, DONNALDA 45.00 45.00 SNR CTR CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/28/93 17371 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 609.57 609.57 GAS SVC/NOV 12/28/93 17372 SPARKLETTS 21.00 21.00 DRINKING WATER 140.02 6104 FILE CABINET 20.87 FILE FRAMES/BINDER 484.55 COPIER PAPER 65.64 PENCILS/APPMNT BOOK/TOKER 48.61 INDEX TABS/STAMPS/FILES 6.24 RUBBER STAMP 12/28/93 17373 STEVEN OFFICE SUPPLY 779.70 13.77 6771 EXPAND FILES 000150 GL24U412/28/93 WARRANT R E G I ST BR PAGE 4 DATE OF WARlUkNT IN FAVOR OF CBBCK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION ISSUE NUMBER AMOUNT MUMR 1,690.24 LEGAL SVC/GENERAL 25.12 LEGAL SVC/STOCKMAN 4,931.00 LEGAL SVC/TUCKER 27.00 LEGAL SVC/ALTMAN 962.56 LEGAL SVC/TURI 3,193.60 LEGAL SVC/C V LAND 12/20/93 17374 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON 13,926.20 3,096.66 LEGAL/WILLIAMS/DESERT SND 12/28/93 17375 SUNNY DUNES NURSERY 44.18 44.18 COLORPAR 12/28/93 17376 TAUSSIC i ASSOC, DAVID 242.16 242.16 PROF SVC/VISTA SANTA ROSA 150.00 CLEAN LOT/SAGEBRSH/WASH 330.00 CLEAN LOT/SAQUARO/DATA PA 165.00 CLEAN LOT/SAQUARO/WASSHTS 330.00 CLEAN LOT/SAGUARO/W1SS 300.00 CLEAN LOT/8AGEHRSH/DATE 12/28/93 17377 TAYLOR AND SONS, STEVE 1,440.00 165.00 CLEAN LOT/BTTLE BRSH/DATE 12/28/93 17378 TEL KEY INC. 50.08 50.08 2746 PANEL 12/28/93 17379 TIGER REPRO GRAPHICS 362.04 362.04 COPIER TOM 4,123.13 DESIGN CONSULT 12/28/93 17380 TKD ASSOCIATES INC 6,970.42 2,855.29 PROF SVC/DESIGN 17.35 RAINSUIT 12/26/93 17361 TOPS i BARRICADES INC 5,782.78 5,765.43 STRIPING PAINT 12/28/93 17382 TRI-LAKE CONSULTANTS 20,566.00 20,568.00 PROF SVC/ENCIPHERING 12/20/93 17383 TRULY NOLEN E)MU MINATING 70.00 70.00 PEST CONTROL/DEC 12/26/93 17304 VALLEY OFFICE EQUIPMENT 114.00 114.OD COPIER MAINT 32.31 APPMNT BOOKS 177.64 BINDERS/WRITER RIBBONS 12/28/93 17385 VIKING 230.27 20.32 COPIER PAPER 12/20/93 17386 WAL-MART STORES INC 124.90 124.90 TRUCK BATTERIES 12/20/93 17307 WALLING 6 MCCALLUM ASSDC. 308.89 308.89 PROF SVC/SNR CNTR 12/28/93 17368 WASTE MGMRT OF THE DESERT 145.55 145.55 PORTABLE TOILETS 12/28/93 17389 WELCH'S UNIFORM R88TAL 35.95 35.95 NATO 411.97 COPIER MAINT 300.63 FAX MACH INK CARTRIDGES 12/28/93 17390 XEROX CORPORATION 990.60 276.00 2737 FAX MACH INK CARTRIDGES 48.44 WORK BOOTS 12/28/93 17391 YELLOW MART STORE 80.72 32.28 HIP BOOTS ------ SUB TOTAL DEMANDS---------- 1,723,582.94 •• 12/17/93 PAYROLL 56,258.50 -------------- GRAND TOTAL DEMANDS 1,779,841.44 �waorrr� 000151 GL33U4 12/28/93 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 1 DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUME DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER GENERAL FUND 17.50 CVMACC SUPERVISORS BRXFST 12/14/93 17192* CVMACC SUPERVISORS HFE 35.00 17.50 CVMACC SUPERVISORS BRKFST 346.80 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 76.03 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 12/15/93 17194* REM CASH 682.83 60.00 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 2.75 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 8.05 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 38.68 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 6.72 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 53.43 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 149.45 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 19.30 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 6.97 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 32.27 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 25.94 PETTY CASH REIMSURSEMENT 2.90 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 358.56 12.20 PETTY CASH REIMBURSEMENT 12/15/93 17195* PETTY CASH 12/16/93 17271* RIVERSIDE COUNTY EMP. 9,756.50 9,756.50 EMP CREDIT UN DED 12/17 12/21/93 17272* CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 2,881.40 2,881.40 SWT P/R 12/17/93 13,638.29 PEPS P/R 12/17/93 12/21/93 17273* P.E.R.S. 13,689.72 51.43 SUR BNFT 12/17/93 12/21/93 17274* ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST-457 1,962.50 1,962.50 DEF COMP 12/17/93 12/21/93 17275* UNITED WAY OF THE DESERT 48.00 48.00 EMP CONTRIB 12/17/93 12/22/93 17278* T D DESERT DEVELOPMENT 760.00 760.00 RSF PRECISE PLAN APR FEE 359.00 359.00 CPRS CONF/HOTEL REGISTRA 12/22/93 17279* DIXIE ESCROW 247.00 CPRS CONF REGISTRATION 12/22/93 17280* CAL. PARE/REC. SOCIETY 537.00 290.00 CPRS CONF REGISTRATION 12/28/93 17283 A AND S COFFEE SERVICES 298.00 298.00 COFFEE SUPPLIES 12/28/93 17284 A TO 2 RENTAL CENTER 453.24 453.24 2739 HELIUM/CHAIRS/SKIRTING 7.52 SHOP TOWELS 12/28/93 17287 ACE HARDWARE 55.11 47.59 HOSE/PLIERS/KEYS 82.43 MEMO FORMS 12/28/93 17288 ARROW PRINTING COMPANY 303.05 220.52 ENCROACBMNT PERMIT APR 12/28/93 17290 BAKER, PEGGY 40.00 40.00 SNR CTR MUSIC DIRECTOR 12/28/93 17292 BANK OF AMERICA N T C 3,519.00 3,519.00 ADMIN/REVENUE BONDS 1991 53.16- RETURNED BATTERY 12/28/93 17293 BIG A AUTO PARTS 106.32- 53.16- CREDIT/FAN CLUTCH 12/28/93 17294 BOGAN 6 ASSOC INC, G 241.50 241.50 SNR CTR DANCE INSTRUCTOR 81.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 1, 040.50 PLAN CHECK FEES 81.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 657.03 PLAN CHECK FEES 270.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 486.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 81.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 92.92 PLAN CHECK FEES 891.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 1,944.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 1,646.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 12/28/93 17295 BSI CONSULTANTS INC 8,197.45 927.00 PLAN CHECK FEES 12/28/93 17296 C.V.J.P.I.A 495.00 495.00 SETTLEMENT/CROCKETT 33.40 UNIFORMS 33.40 UNIFORMS 000152 GL33U4 12/28/93 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 2 DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 33.40 UNIFORMS 33.40 UNIFORMS 33.40 UNIFORMS 12/28/93 17298 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 200.40 33.40 UNIFORMS 12/28/93 17299 CAL ROOFING CO 160.00 160.00 FIRE STA 70 ROOF REPAIRS 12/28/93 17301 CHANEY COMPANY, GEORGE H. 10,690.06 10,690.06 INSPECTION SERVICES 12/28/93 17303 CLARK, ALTON 150.00 150.00 BOB HOPE CLASSIC PSOG AD 41.12 ADHESIVE/COPY SOLDER 12/28/93 17304 COACHELLA VALLEY 153.40 112.28 LASER TONER/FILES 25.00 .CELLULAR PHONE REPAIRS 73.49 CELLULAR PHONE REPAIRS 12/28/93 17307 COMPACT RADIO TELEPHONE 171.98 73.49 CELLULAR PHONE REPAIRS 12/28/93 17300 COMSERCO 31.25 31.25 ANTENNA 12/28/93 17309 DANNY'S PEST CONTROL 50.00 50.00 PEST CONTROL/DEC 12/28/93 17310 DECRATREND PAINTS 365.00 365.00 PAINT 12/28/93 17311 DESERT FLAGS AND POLES 1,373.08 1,373.08 2735 CITY LOGO FLAGS 12/28/93 17312 DESERT JANITOR SERVICE 2,707.00 2,707.00 JANITORIAL SVC/DEC 12/28/93 17313 DFM ASSOCIATES 35.83 35.83 1994 CA ELECTIONS CODE 26.50 PHOTOS 9.45 PHOTOS 33.40 PHOTOS 12/28/93 17315 DOUBLE PRINTS 1 HOUR PBOT 92.58 23.23 PHOTOS 12/28/93 17317 ECONO SEWER SERVICES 260.00 260.00 PUMP SEPTIC TANKS 12/28/93 17318 EISENHOWER IMMEDIATE CARE 248.00 248.00 EMPLOYEE EXAMINATIONS 12/28/93 17319 FAMILY YMCA OF THE DESERT 221.00 221.00 YMCA MOVING COSTS/LAMS 12/28/93 17320 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP. 217.50 217.50 FEDERAL EXPRESS 12/28/93 17322 GENERAL TELEPHONE 70.02 70.02 PHONE SVC/DEC 12/28/93 17326 HEGGE ELECTRIC 360.00 360.00 ADD 2 YARD LIGHTS 36.58 COUNCIL NAME PLATES 12/28/93 17328 HOLMAN INDUSTRIES 49.43 12.85 COUNCIL NAME PLATE 12/28/93 17329 I.A.P.M.O. 50.00 50.00 IAPMO DUES 12/28/93 17330 ICED 75.00 75.00 ICBO DUES 12/28/93 17331 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST. 97.17 97.17 ELEC SVC/NOV 12/28/93 17333 JP REPROGRAPHICS 10.77 10.77 PROF SVC/BLUEPRINTS 12/28/93 17334 JUBILEE POOL 6 SPA CARE 95.00 95.00 FOUNTAIN MAINT 448.40 CONTRACT LABOR 12/28/93 17335 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES 683.81 235.41 CONTRACT LABOR 12/26/93 17337 KENS AUTO REPAIR 35.65 35.85 REPLACE BELT 12/28/93 17338 KICAR AND ASSOCIATES 693.05 693.05 PROP SVC/ENGINEERING 12/28/93 17339 LIEBERT CASSIDY FRIERSON 2,500.00 2,500.00 CVERC MEMBERSHIP 17.24 KEYS 12/28/93 17341 LOCK SHOP INC, THE 23.06 5.82 KEYS 12/28/93 17342 LOS ANGELES TIMES 15.54 15.54 LA TIMES SUBSCRIP 12/28/93 17347 MICHIGAN REC 8 PARK ASSOC 90.00 90.00 MICHIGAN REC 3 PARK DUES 12/28/93 17348 MICROSOFT CORPORATION 289.07 289.07 COMPUTER SOFTWARE 12/28/93 17349 MOTIVATIONAL SYSTEMS INC 475.00 475.00 NAME PLATES 12/28/93 17350 MOTOROLA INC. 966.75 966.75 REPEATER 6 MAINT 98.00 NATL NOTARY SEMINAR 12/28/93 17352 NATIONAL NOTARY ASSN 124.00 26.00 NATL NOTARY ASSN DUES 12/28/93 17353 NOEL BRUSH AWARDS 27.35 27.35 EOM PLAQUE 444.96 CONTRACT LABOR 296.64 CONTRACT LABOR 12/28/93 17354 NORRELL SERV INC 1,211.28 469.68 CONTRACT LABOR 12/28/93 17356 PALM DESERT COUNTRY CLUB 50.00 50.00 REC EAU RNT/SNR CTR CLSS 60.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 000153 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 3 GL33U6 12/28/93 DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 12/28/93 17357 PC TROUBLESHOOTER 160.00 100.00 COMPUTER SERVICES 45.79 BUSINESS CARDS/HARTUNG 12/28/93 17358 PRINTING PLACE, THE 91.58 45.79 6824 BUSINESS CARDS/CHANEY 12/28/93 17360 PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS 38.92 38.92 OFFICE SUPPLIES 21.44 COPIER REPAIR 12/28/93 17361 RIVERSIDE BLUEPRINT 42.89 21.45 COPIER REPAIR 12/28/93 17362 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 3,864.00 3,864.00 BOOKING FEES/OCT 12/28/93 17363 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF 475.00 475.00 ANIMAL SHELTER SVC 12/28/93 17366 RUBINO, MICHAEL J. 803.25 803.25 LEGAL SVC/YBARRA 12/28/93 17368 S.C.A.C.E.O. 25.00 25.00 SCACEO SUBSCRIP 12/28/93 17370 SMOLENS, DONNALDA 45.00 45.00 SNR CTR CLASS INSTRUCTOR 12/28/93 17371 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 609.57 609.57 GAS SVC/NOV 12/28/93 17372 SPAAKLETTS 21.00 21.00 DRINKING WATER 65.64 PENCILS/APPMNT BOOK/TONER 484.55 COPIER PAPER 20.87 FILE FRAMES/BINDER 6.24 RUBBER STAMP 48.61 INDEX TABS/STAMPS/FILES 140.02 6104 FILE CABINET 12/28/93 17373 STEVES OFFICE SUPPLY 779.70 13.77 6771 EXPAND FILES 17376 TAUSSIC 6 ASSOC, DAVID 242.16 242.16 PROF SVC/VISTA SANTA ROSA 12/28/93 165.00 CLEAN LOT/SAGUARO/DATE PA 165.00 CLEAN L0T/SAGUARO/DATE PA 165.00 CLEAN LOT/SAGUARO/WASHNTN 165.00 CLEAN LOT/STTLE BRSH/DATE 150.00 CLEAN LOT/SAGEBRSH/WASH 150.00 CLEAN LOT/SAGEBBSH/DATE 150.00 CLEAN LOT/SAGEBRSH/DATE 165.00 CLEAN LOT/SAGUARO/WASH 17377 TAYLOR AND SONS, STEVE 1,440.00 165.00 CLEAN LOT/SAGUARO/WASH 12/28/93 12/28/93 17378 TEL KEY INC. 50.08 50.08 2746 PANEL 90.51 COPIER TONER 90.51 COPIER TONER 90.51 COPIER TONER 12/28/93 17379 TIGER REPRO GRAPHICS 362.04 90.51 COPIER TONER 12/28/93 17382 TRI-LAKE CONSULTANTS 1,176.00 1,176.00 PROF SVC/ENGINEERING 12/28/93 17383 TRULY NOLEN EXTERMINATING 70.00 70.00 PEST CONTROL/DEC 57.00 COPIER MAINT 12/28/93 17384 VALLEY OFFICE EQUIPMENT 114.00 57.00 COPIER MAINT 32.31 APPMNT BOOKS 177.64 BINDERS/WRITER RIBBONS 230.27 20.32 COPIER PAPER 12/28/93 17385 VIKING 12/28/93 17386 WAL-MART STORES INC 124.90 124.90 TRUCK BATTERIES 12/28/93 17389 WELCH'S UNIFORM RENTAL 35.95 35.95 MATS 411.97 COPIER MAINT 300.63 FAX MACH INK CARTRIDGES 12/28/93 17390 XEROX CORPORATION 990.60 278.00 2737 FAX MACH INK CARTRIDGES -------- TOTAL GENERAL FUND $81,277.78 STATE GAS TAX FUND 12/14/93 17191* BANGERTER, MICHAEL 51,030.00 51,030.00 REF PARTIAL SECURITY DEP 24.38 ENGINE STAND RENTAL 12/21/93 17196* A-1 RENTS 49.38 25.00 ENGINE HOIST RENTAL 12/21/93 17277* COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 1,100.00 1,100.00 FINE HYDRANT WATER METER 000154 GL33U4 12/28/93 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 4 DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 25.00 ENGINE HOIST 24.44 ENGINE STAND 12/28/93 17285 A-1 RENTS 356.96 307.52 TRACTOR RENTAL 12/28/93 17286 ACE ALTERNATOR 171.26 171.26 BATTERY/FLASHER 12/28/93 17289 ATCO MANUFACTURING CO 347.00 347.00 DEGREASER 16.36 TRUCK PARTS 29.90 OIL STOCK/AIR FILTER 74.99 FILTER STOCK 32.33- CORE CREDIT 50.42 FUEL PUMP 154.80 TORQUE WRENCH/RING COMP 12/28/93 17293 BIG A AUTO PARTS 1,834.74 1,540.60 ENGINE REBUILD/TRACTOR 12/28/93 17297 CA STREET MAINTENANCE INC 4,638.86 4,638.86 STREET SWEEPING/NOV 38.25 UNIFORMS 38.26 UNIFORMS 12/28/93 17298 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 114.78 38.26 UNIFORMS 37.82 EQUIP FUEL. 12/28/93 17300 CARR 8 CARR INC 75.41 37.59 EQUIP FUEL 12/28/93 17306 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 24.84 24.84 WATER SVC/NOV 71.75 TRACTOR MAIN BEARING 372.99 TRACTOR STARTER 8.14 TRACTOR TEMP SENDER 12/28/93 17321 GARNER IMPLEMENT CO. 464.41 11.53 TRACTOR REPAIR PARTS 10.00 TIRE REPAIR 12/28/93 17323 GEORGES GOODYEAR 20.00 10.00 TIRE REPAIR 120.50 2758 PARTS WASHER 12/28/93 17324 GRAINGER, W W 240.99 120.49 2750 PARTS WASHER 12/28/93 17325 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 71.59 71.59 ASPHALT 23.85 SLED SVC/OCT 82.59 ELEC SVC/NOV 162.78 HIM SVC/NOV 101.54 ELEC SVC/NOV 99.35 ELEC SVC/NOV 31.56 ELEC SVC/NOV 167.15 ELEC SVC/NOV 278.68 ELEC SVC/NOV 189.02 ELEC SVC/NOV 162.04 ELEC SVC/NOV 182.17 ELEC SVC/NOV 154.02 ELEC SVC/NOV 4.58 ELEC SVC/NOV 150.43 ELEC SVC/NC1V 172.97 ELEC SVC/NOV 248.79 ELEC SVC/NOV 335.02 ELSC SVC/NOV 3.85 ELEC SVC/NOV 12/28/93 17331 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST. 2,609.64 59.25 ELEC SVC/NOV 12/28/93 17332 J T DISTRIBUTING 105.70 105.70 ASPHALT PATCH 12/28/93 17346 METROMEDIA PAGING SERVICE 28.97 28.97 VOICE PAGER 370.39 STRIPING PAINT 5,395.04 STRIPING PAINT 12/28/93 17381 TOPS 8 BARRICADES INC 5,782.70 17.35 RAINSUIT 48.44 WORN BOOTS 12/28/93 17391 YELLOW MART STORE 80.72 32.28 HIP BOOTS -------- TOTAL STATE GAS TAX FUND $69,148.03 000155 GL33U4 12/28/93 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 5 DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER CITY-WIDE ASSESSMENT DIST 89-1 75.00 FILTER STOCK 12/28/93 17293 BIG A AUTO PARTS 82.10 7.10 GRINDING WHEEL. 94.58 UNIFORMS 52.33 UNIFORMS 12/28/93 17298 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 192.53 45.62 UNIFORMS 18.00 WATER SVC/NOV 333.74 WATER SVCINOV 33.58 WATER SVC/NOV 13.00 WATER SVC/NOV 34.36 WATER SVC/NOV 210.54 WATER SVC/NOV 188.24 WATER SVC/NOV 13.28 WATER SVC/NOV 17.00 WATER SVC/NOV 162.48 WATER SVC/NOV 833.06 WATER SVC/NOV 413.06 WATER SVC/NOV 115.00 WATER SVC/NOV 76.36 WATER SVC/NOV 36.04 WATER SVC/NOV 17.00 WATER SVC/NOV 10.60 WATER SVC/NOV 230.24 WATER SVC/NOV 193.96 WATER SVC/NOV 128.44 WATER SVC/NOV 272.92 WATER SVC/NOV 31.56 WATER SVC/NOV 29.88 WATER SVC/NOV 33.24 WATER SVC/NOV 120.04 WATER SVC/NOV 36.04 WATER SVC/NOV 401.30 WATER SVC/NOV 71.88 WATER SVC/NOV 369.38 WATER SVC/NOV 27.08 WATER SVC/NOV 162.74 WATER SVC/NOV 58.44 WATER SVC/NOV 19.24 WATER SVC/NOV 65.50 WATER SVC/NOV 32.68 WATER SVC/NOV 17.00 WATER SVC/NOV 12.28 WATER SVC/NOV 25.40 WATER SVC/NOV 12.16 WATER SVC/NOV 51.72 WATER SVC/NOV 179.84 WATER SVC/NOV 325.12 WATER SVC/NOV 12/20/93 17306 COACHELLA VALLEY WATER 5,531.90 1,097.38 WATER SVC/NOV 120.50 2758 PARTS WASHER 12/28/93 17324 GRAINGER, W W 240.99 120.49 2758 PARTS WASHER 296.31 FERTILIZER 23.67 IRRIG PARTS 105.37 FERTILIZER 00r)15r) GL33U4 12/28/93 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 6 DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMS DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 51.28 IRRIG CONTROLLER REP 13.52 IRRIG PARTS 12/28/93 17327 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 520.42 30.27 IRRIG REP/FRITZ BURNS PRK 4,115.41 ELEC SVC/NOV 53.74 ELEC SVC/NOV 30.60 ELEC SVC/OCT 7.20 ELEC SVC/OCT 37.24 ELEC SVC/NOV 8.88 ELEC SVC/Nov 3.85 RISC SVC/NGV 27.35 ELEC SVC/NCV 13.91 ELEC SVC/NOV 5.00 ELEC SVC/NOV 24.83 ELEC SVC/NOV 3.05 ELEC SVC/NOV 3.85 ELEC SVC/NOV 3.85 ELEC SVC/NCN 8.95 ELEC SVC/NOV 27.15 ELEC SVC/NOV 11.14 ELEC SVC/NOV 46.86 ELEC SVC/NOV 3.85 BLEC SVC/NOV 3.85 ELEC SVC/NOV 9.69 ELEC SVC/NGV 8.22 ELBC SVC/NOV 4.69 ELEC SVC/NOV 14.79 ELBC SVC/NOV - 3.85 BLBC SVC/NOV 12/28/93 17331 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST. 4,506.33 25.72 ELEC SVC/NOV 1,449.53 VANDALIZED LIGHTING REP 12/28/93 17340 LIGHT SOURCE 1,849.85 400.32 VANDALIZED LIGHTING REP 4,895.00 LANDSCAPE 3,510.25 LANDSCAPE 2,227.05 LANDSCAPE 12/28/93 17345 MENTONE TURF SUPPLY 10,812.46 180.16 LANDSCAPE 117.11 MOWER BLADES 12/28/93 17355 PACIFIC EQUIP IRRIGATION 126.05 8.94 IGNITION SWITCH 12/28/93 17375 SUNNY DUNES NURSERY 44.18 44.18 COLORPAK 12/28/93 17388 WASTE MGMNT OF THE DESERT 145.55 145.55 PORTABLE TOILETS -------- TOTAL CITY-WIDE ASSESSMENT DIST 89 $25,054.35 " QULMBY FUND 12/28/93 17344 MALONEY INC, T I 1,327.00 1,327.00 PROF SVC/PALM ROYAL PARR -------- TOTAL QUIMBY FUND $1,327.00 INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 12/28/93 17301 CHANEY COMPANY, GEORGE H. 57.53 57.53 INSPECTION SERVICES 12/28/93 17302 CHIEF SIGN CRAFTS 269.38 269.38 SIGNS 12/28/93 17316 DUNPHY, JAMES T 9,658.80 9,558.80 SNR CNTR CONST/SITEWORr 22.00 PROF SVC/BLUEPRINTS 80.70 PROP SVC/BLUEPRINTS 12/28/93 17333 JP REPROGRAPHICS 461.00 350.30 PROF SVC/BLUEPRINTS 12/28/93 17338 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES 185.00 185.00 PROF SVC/ENGINEERING 000157 GL33U4 12/28/93 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 7 DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 832.15 PROF SVC/PLAN CHECK 12/28/93 17364 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF 1,254.17 422.02 PROF SVC/INSPECTION 12/28/93 17369 SIERRA PACIFIC ELEC CONT 73,368.18 73,368.18 CONSTRUCTION/SIGNALS 2,690.29 PROF SVC/DESIGN 165.00 PROP SVC/DESIGN 12/28/93 17380 TED ASSOCIATES INC 6,978.42 4,123.13 DESIGN CONSULT 12/28/93 17387 WALLING i MCCALLUM ASSOC. 300.89 308.89 PROF SVC/SNR CNTR -------- TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUND $92,541.37 * 88-1 AGENCY FUND 12/28/93 17351 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 444.11 444.11 ASSMNT DIST ADMINISTRATE -------- TOTAL 88-1 AGENCY FUND $444.11 * 89-2 AGENCY FUND 12/28/93 17351 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 568.57 568.67 ASSMNT DIST ADMINISTRATN -------- TOTAL 89-2 AGENCY FUND $566.67 * 90-1 AGENCY FUND 12/28/93 17351 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 594.18 594.18 ASSMNT DIST ADMINISTRATN -------- TOTAL 90-i AGENCY FUND $594.18 91-1 AGENCY FUND 12/28/93 17351 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 962.09 962.09 ASSMNT DIST AD14INISTRATN -------- TOTAL 91-1 AGENCY FUND $962.09 * 92-1 AGENCY FUND 12/28/93 17351 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 760.68 760.68 ASSMNT DIST ADMINISTRATN -------- TOTAL 92-1 AGENCY FUND $760.68 * RDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PAM1 9,814.90 KENKO CONST ESC N952-031 57,104.87 KENKO CONST ESC N952-031 12/28/93 17291 BANK OF AMERICA 91,890.12 24,970.35 KENK0 CONST ESC N952-031 12/28/93 17325 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 329,970.62 329,970.62 CONSTRUCTION 80.55 PROF SVC/BLUEPRINTS 16.16 PROF SVC/BLUEPRINTS 620.62 PROF SVC/BLUEPRINTS 12/28/93 17333 JP REPROGRAPHICS 727.25 9.92 PROF SVC/BLUEPRINTS 98,149.00 CONTRACTOR ST IMP/92-1 571,048.70 CONTRACTOR ST IMP/92-1 249,703.50 CONTRACTOR ST IMP/92-1 9,814.90- ESCROW FUNDS 57,104.87- ESCROW FUNDS 12/28/93 17336 KENKO INC 827,011.08 24,970.35- ESCROW FUNDS 12/28/93 17338 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES 1,155.00 1,155.00 PROF SVC/ENGINEERING 25.86 PHOTOS 14.55 PHOTOS 53.88 FILM 12/28/93 17343 M K CAMERA i PHOTO 126.62 32.33 PHOTOS 000158 GL33U4 12/28/93 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 8 • DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT NUF®ER 108.00 PROF SVC/A88MET DIST WATR 702.00 PROF SVC/ASSMNT DIST STS 2,036.00 PROF SVC/ASSMNT DIST SEWR 1,838.00 PROF SVC/ASSMNT DIST STRM 12/20/93 17359 PROF SERVICE INDUSTRIES 5,637.00 953.00 PROP SVC/ASSMNT DIST STRM 68.00 PROF SVC/BUDGET/ACCTNG 1,899.39 PROF SVC/IMPLEMENTATION 979.67 PROF SVC/IMPLEMENTATION 12/28/93 17365 ROSENOW SPEVACEK GROUP 3,027.06 80.00 .PROF Svc/COUNTY LITIGATN 12/28/93 17367 RUTAN 8 TUCKER 4,823.36 4,823.36 LEGAL SVC/BHLLANCA 962.56 LEGAL SVC/TURI 27.00 LEGAL SVC/ALTMAN 12/20/93 17374 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON 2,136.92 1,149.36 LEGAL SVC/GENERAL 7,776.00 PROP SVC/ENGINEERING 8,860.00 PROF SVC/ENGINEERING 12/28/93 17382 TRI-LAKE CONSULTANT'S 19,392.00 2,736.00 PROF SVC/ENGINffitING -------- TOTAL RDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PAR $1,285,899.03 RDA LOW/MOD FUND PAN1 12/21/93 17276• SPRING MNT ESCROW TRUST 4,729.36 4,729.36 BBC ►10444MB/LCT 9 BLX165 12/22/93 17281• DIXIE ESCROW 40,000.00 40,000.00 LAHDMABK/WILLIAMS PURCH 12/28/93 17305 COACHELLA VALLEY LARD 77.05 77.05 CVLP RENTAL PROP MAINT EX 12/28/93 17338 KICAK AND ASSOCIATES 421.24 421.24 PROF SVC/ENGINEERING 9.00 PROF SVC/BUDGET/ACCTNG 416.79 PROP SVC/HOUSING PRDJ 16.25 PROF SVC/HOOBING PLAN 244.91 PROF SVC/IMPLEMENTATION 1,301.00 PROF SVC/STOCKMAN DEV 12,989.00 PROF SVC/WLLLIAMS DEV 1,196.85 PROP SVCIWILLIA14S DEV 12/28/93 17365 ROSENOW SPEVACEE GROUP 16,193.80 20.00 PROP SVC/COUNTY LITIGATN 12/28/93 17367 RUTAN 8 TUCKER 1,205.84 1,205.84 LEGAL SVC/BELL1 CR 3,096.68 LEGAL/WILLIAMS/DESERT SND 3,193.60 LEGAL SVC/C V LAND 25.12 LEGAL SVC/STOCRIAN 12/28/93 17374 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON 6,467.52 152.12 LEGAL SVC/GENERAL -------- TOTAL RDA LOW/MOD FUND PAM1 $69,094.81 RDA CAPITAL PROJECTS PA#2 51,486.72 PROP SVC/WASH BRIDGE 12/28/93 17314 DM17M 89,102.07 37,615.35 PROF SVC/WASH BRIDGE 12/28/93 17333 JP REPROGRAPHICS 32.97 32.97 PROF SVC/BLUEPRINTS 17.00 PROP SVC/BUDGET/ACCTNG 50.00 PROF SVC/TDC DEV 12/28/93 17365 ROSENOW SPEVACEX GROUP 1,017.00 950.00 PROF SVC/LQ CNYH CTR 4,931.00 LEGAL SVC/TUCKER 12/28/93 17374 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON 5,218.34 287.34 LEGAL SVC/GENERAL -------- TOTAL RDA CAPITAL PROJECTS PAi2 $95,370.38 ' RDA LOW/MOD FUND PA82 . 6.00 PROF SVC/BUDGET/ACCTNG 416.78 PROF SVC/HOUSING PROJ nn()l MA GL33U4 12/26/93 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND DATE WARRANT PAYEE CBECE NUMBER AUNT PAGE 9 AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER 12/28/93 17365 R0SEN0W BPEVACEN GROUP 439.03 16.25 12/20/93 17374 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON 101.42 101.42 -------- TOTE. RDA LOW/MOD FUND PA12 $540.45 " -------- ----- GRAND TOTAL DEMANDS--------- 1,723,582.94 ** TOM DEMANDS - 1/4/94 WARRANTS 1,723,502.94 PATBmL 56,258.50 -------------- 1,779,841.44 TOTAL DEMANDS - CITY FUNDS 272,678.27 PAYROLL 56,258.50 -------------- TOTAL CITY FUNDS 328,936.77 TOTAL DEMANDS - RDA FUNDS 1,450,904.67 GRAND TOTAL DEN AND 3 -------------- 1,779,841.44 tl tl����Ytltl PROF WXIBOUBING PLAN LEGAL SVC/GENERAL COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Demand Register - JANUARY 18, 1994 BACKGROUND: Prepaid Warrants: 17394-174281 26,668.04 17433-174371 2,726.72 P/R 9508 - 95641 $69,359.22 Payable Warrants: 17440 - 175141 $1,580F441.34 $1,679,195.32 FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Demand of Cash - City $306,315.27 RECOMMENDATION: Approval of Demand Register Submitted by: Signature AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 1 STUDY SESSION: CITY DEMANDS RDA DEMANDS APPROVED BY: Approved for submission to City Council ROBERT L. HUNT CITY MANAGER $306,315.27 $1,372,880.05 $1,679,195.32 000161 >L24U4 1/10/94 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 DATE OF WARRANT IN FAVOR OF ISSUE NUMBER 1/04/94 17433• COSPER, DAVID M 1/05/94 17434" MONROVIA NURSERY COMPANY 1/05/94 17435' UC REGENTS, UNIV OF CALIF 1/05/94 17436' LA QUINTA CHAMBER OF 1/07/94 17437' INN AT THE PARK 1/10/94 17440 A AND S COFFEE SERVICES 1/10/94 17441 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 1/10/94 17442 A-1 RENTS 1/10/94 17443 ABLE RIBBON TECH 1/10/94 17444 ACE HARDWARE 1/10/94 17445 AFFILIATED SECURITY SERV 1/10/94 17446 ALBERTSONS FOOD CM 1627 1/10/94 17447 ARROW PRINTING COMPANY 1/10/94 17448 AT 6 T 1/10/94 17449 BAKER,FRED 1/10/94 17450 BANK OF AMERICA 1/10/94 17451 BANK OF AMERICA 1/10/94 17452 BANK OF AMERICA N T C CHECK AMOUNT 1,400.49 823.21 225.00 92.00 186.02 123.00 98.21 225.00 1,331.83 572.33 337.00 489.26 452.38 52.41 14.49 61.39 81,021.06 135.46 1/10/94 17453 BIG A AUTO PARTS 14.46 1/10/94 17454 BSI CONSULTANTS INC 174.82 1/10/94 17455 BUSINESS RECORDS CORP 182.21 1/10/94 17456 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 225.98 1/10/94 17457 CHANEY COMPANY, GEORGE H. 5,867.55 1/10/94 17458 CONNECTING POINT 289.85 1/10/94 17459 CORONA, CITY OF 59.00 1/10194 17460 DESERT JANITOR SERVICE 451.32 1/10/94 17461 DESERT SUN, THE 1,734.99 AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER 1,400.49 MOVING EXP/D COSPER 823.21 PLANTS 225.00 CODE REQ SEMINAR 92.00 MAYOR'S BREAKFAST 186.02 LODGING CPRS/A DICKENS 123.00 COFFEE SUPPLIES 98.21 TBLCLTH/TABLES/URN/BOWL 225.00 CASE LOADER 1,331.83 LASER CARTRIDGES 12.25 PROPANE 42.10 PIPE/HAMMER/WIRE 62.41 SHOVEL/UTILITY TUB/BRUSH 31.86 STRAINER/SOCKET/HAMMER 53.33 DOOR STOPS/BRUSH/STRIPPER 88.59 PIPE/SHOVELS/TAPE 42.44 GLUE/STAPLES/SCRAPER 9.35 ABSORBENT/STAPLES 31.17 CLEAN-OUTS/TAPE 32.62 BROOM/ANTIFREEZE/OIL 52.00 POWER CENTER/CLEANERS 48.15 TIES/TAPE/GLOVES 7.39 BRUSHES 34.29 PIPE 12.39 ANTIFREEZE 9.63 PEST CONTROL 2.36 BATTERIES 201.00 FIRE ALARM SVC 136.00 BURGLAR ALARM SVC 2.89 TOWELS 7.37 SNR CNTR POT LUCK 419.05 HOLIDAY OPEN HOUSE 59.95 MEETING 219.81 ENVELOPES 68.83 EMERGENCY CHK REQ FORMS 163.74 WINDOW ENVELOPES 52.41 PHONE CORDS 14.49 MILEAGE/F BAKER 25.00 CREDIT CARD FEE 36.39 CREDIT CARD FEE 6 CHGS 81,021.06 KENKO CONST ESC #952-031 135.46 AGENT SERVICES 88-1 60.40 SHOCKS-TRK 1/TAIL PIPE-2 123.79- PARTS RETURNED 4.33 OIL SENDER/TRACTOR 73.52 OXYGEN/ARGON/GASKET MTRL 174.82 PLAN CHECK 77.85 1099 FORMS 104.36 W-2 FORMS 225.98 UNIFORMS 5,867.55 PROF SVC/INSPECTION 289.85 ENVELOPE FEEDER 59.00 ANIMAL CONTROL TRAINING 451.32 JANITORIAL SVC/DEC 109.91 DESERT SUN SUBSCRIPTION 1,625.08 LEGAL ADVERTISING 000162 GL24U4 1/10/94 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 DATE OF WARRANT IN FAVOR OF CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION ISSUE NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 1/10/94 17462 DOUBLE PRINTS 1 HOUR PHOT 7.77 7.77 PHOTOS 1/10/94 17463 GASCARD INC - 3OD16 1,453.79 1,453.79 GAS PURCH/DEC 1/10/94 17464 GASTON, GINGER 7.81 7.81 MILEAGE/G GASTON 1/10/94 17465 GENERAL TELEPHONE 2,475.59 2,475.59 PHONE SVC/JAN 35,434.72 RETENTION PROG PMT 1,2,3 1/10/94 17466 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 538,315.44 502,880.72 CONST WHTWTR/WASH BRIDGE 1/10/94 17467 HALL S FOREMAN INC 1,750.00 1,750.00 PROF SVC/ADAMS ST 25.86 PLANTING TABS 91.82 HOSE/SHRUBS 74.80 GOHPER TRAPS 1/10/94 17468 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 249.35 56.87 IRRIG @ CIVIC CNTR 1/10/94 17469 HISPANIC HOTLINE 158.00 158.00 JOB ADVERTISEMENT 1/10/94 17470 ICED 135.08 135.08 CODE PUBLICATIONS 1/10/94 17471 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST. 33.74 33.74 ELEC SVC/DEC 1/10/94 17472 JOBS AVAILABLE 93.60 93.60 JOB ADVERTISEMENT 1/10/94 17473 JP REPROGRAPHICS 728.09 728.09 BLUEPRINTS 1/10/94 17474 JUHOLA, SAUNDRA 51.20 51.20 COUNCIL SWEARING IN EVENT 1/10/94 17475 KEITH COMPANIES, THE 8,823.00 8,823.00 PROFSVC/JFFRSN ALIGNMENT 1/10/94 17476 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES 734.26 734.26 CONTRACT LABOR 400,988.58 CONTRCTR/ST IMP 92-1 40,098.86- RETENTION TO ESCROW 260,439.00 CONTRCTR/ST IMP 92-1 26,043.90- RETENTION TO ESCROW 148,783.00 CONTRCTR/ST IMP 92-1 1/10/94 17477 KENKO INC 729,189.52 14,878.30- RETENTION TO ESCROW 1/10/94 17478 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 485.77 485.77 PHONE SVC/DEC 1/10/94 17479 LICALSI, PAMELA 37.12 37.12 MILEAGE/LI CALII 1/10/94 17480 LOS ANGELES TIMES 15.36 15.36 LA TIME SUBSCRIPTION 1/10/94 17481 M K CAMERA 6 PHOTO 11.80 11.00 PHOTOS 1/10/94 17482 MARRIOTT 297.00 297.00 LODGING/CPRS CONF/SMITH 4,666.08 LANDSCAPE LMC 01 950.00 LANDSCAPE LMC 02 1/10/94 17683 MENTONE TURF SUPPLY 10,575.02 4,958.94 LANDSCAPE NORTH END 69.02 MUFFLER TRK M2 1/10/94 17484 MUFFLER WORLD 138.04 69.02 MUFFLER TRK M3 1/10/94 17485 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 3,367.43 3,367.43 ASSMNT DIST ADMN 127.36 EMP SERVICE PLAQUES 1/10/94 17486 NOEL BRUSH AWARDS 182.66 55.30 EOM PLAQUE 1/10/94 17487 NORRELL SERV INC 692.16 692.16 CONTRACT LABOR 1/10/94 17488 PALM DESERT COUNTRY CLUB 50.00 50.00 REC HALL/SNR CTR DANCE CL 1/10/94 17489 PARKSON PIPELINE MTRLS 111.52 111.52 REPAIR WATER MAIN 18.92 THOMAS QUIDE - 4.28 DESK CALENDAR 1/10/94 17490 PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS 121.38 98.18 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1/10/94 17491 QUILL CORPORATION 175.57 175.57 COMPTR ANTI GLARE FILTERS 1/10/94 17492 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 133,635.76 133,635.76 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVC 1/10/94 17493 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF 32.10 32.10 CASSETTE TAPES 1/10/94 17494 SMITH, MARILYN 175.00 175.00 TRAVEL ADVANCE/SMITH 1/10/94 17495 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 22.43 22.43 GAS SVC/NOV 1/10/94 17496 SPRINT 574.91 574.91 PHONE SVC/DEC 3.92 NOTEBOOK 140.02 FILE CABINET 2.88 CALENDAR REFILL 12.04 ORGANIZER 3.92 PEN REFILLS 000163 GL24U4 1/10/94 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 3 DATE OF WARRANT IN FAVOR OF CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION ISSUE NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 1/10/94 17497 STEVES OFFICE SUPPLY 199.48 36.70 LABELS/PENS/DISKS 14,212.36 LEGAL SVC/WYMER/ITM 19,185.17 LEGAL SVC/GENERAL 182.85 LEGAL SVC/BURKEIT 2,793.46 LEGAL SVC/52 EMNT DOMAIN 982.35 LEGAL SVC/GENERAL. 1,241.56 LEGAL SVC/STOCKMAN 1,677.50 LEGAL SVC/TUCKER 85.00 LEGAL SVC/TURI 2,418.63 LEGAL SVC/CV LAND 1/10/94 17498 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON 48,791.12 6,012.24 LEGAL SVC/WILLIAMS/DSRT S 120.46 CHAINS FOR CHAINSAW 1/10/94 17499 SUSKI s SAKEMI MOWERS AND 144.16 23.70 EDGER BLADES 1/10/94 17500 TARGET STORES 72.70 72.70 DOCUMENT FRAMES 150.00 CLEAN LOT/ARROBA/ALVARADO 165.00 CLEAN LOT/ALVAAADO/MONTEZ 1/10/94 17501 TAYLOR AND SONS, STEVE 480.00 165.00 CLEAN LOT/DSRT CLB/VENTUR 1/10/54 17502 TIGER REPRO GRAPHICS 70.21 70.21 BOND PAPER 1/10/94 17503 TKD ASSOCIATES INC 555.80 555.80 PROF SVC/DESIGN 1/10/94 17504 TOPS S BARRICADES INC 15.62 15.62 FOUL WEATHER SUIT 1/10/94 17505 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 273.00 273.00 USASC DUES 1/10/94 17506 VALLEY OFFICE EQUIPMENT 57.00 57.00 COPIER MAIM 162.30 CALENDARS/HINDERS 1/10/94 17507 VIKING 200.99 38.69 DESK PAD 1/10/94 17508 VIP EXPRESS 40.00 40.00 REF BUS LIC OVERPAYMENT 65.64 DEDICATION SUPPLIES 17.33 SNR CNTR POT LUCK 1/10/94 17509 VONS 93.66 10.69 PHOTOS 19.55 VEHICLE REPAIR 1/10/94 17510 WAL-MART STORES INC 68.59 49.04 OIL/ANTIFREEZE 1/10/94 17511 WALLING 6 MCCALLUM ASSOC. 300.00 300.00 DESIGN 1/10/94 17512 WELCH'S UNIFORM RENTAL 35.95 35.95 MATS 1/10/94 17513 WESCOM COMMUNICATIONS 76.41 76.41 INSTALL PHONE MODEM 99.13 INK CARTRIDGE 1/10/94 17514 XEROX CORPORATION 145.38 46.25 COPIER MAINT ----- SUB TOTAL DEMANDS---------- 1,583,168.06 12/30/93 DEMANDS 26,668.04 12/17/93 PAYROLL 69,359.22 -------------- GRAND TOTAL DEMANDS 1,679,195.32 00016'' GL24U4 12/30/93 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 1 DATE OF WARRANT IN FAVOR OF CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION ISSUE NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 12/30/93 17394 ABELS, JACQUES 100.00 100.00 PLANNING COMMISSION MTNGS 12/30/93 17395 ADOLPH, DON 100.00 100.00 PLANNING COMMISSION MTNGS 12/30/93 17396 ANDERSON, PAUL S 50.00 50.00 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MTNGS 55.89- MONTHLY MEDICAL INS 1/94 1.54- MONTHLY VISION INS 1/94 300.00 MONTHLY SALARY JAN 94 250.00 MONTHLY AUTO COMP JAN 94 12/30/93 17397 BANGERTER, GLENDA L 692.57 200.00 RDA AUTO 6 PHONE COMP 12/30/93 17398 SARROWS,KATIE 100.00 100.00 PLANNING COMMISSION MTNGS 12/30/93 17399 BERNARD, NORRIS S. 50.00 50.00 COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNGS 12/30/93 17400 BEST, LAWRENCE 50.00 50.00 COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNGS 12/30/93 17401 BROWN, DIANA 50.00 50.00 INVESTMENT ADV BRD MTNGS 12/30/93 17402 BYRD SHERIFF, COIS M 267.74 267.74 EMPLOYEE GARNISHMENTS 12/30/93 17403 C.V.J.P.I.A 1,658.55 1,658.55 LONG TERM DISABILITY 12/30/93 17404 CALIFORNIA, STATE OF 3,085.69 3,085.69 SWT P/R 12/31/93 12/30/93 17405 CAMPBELL, JAMES 50.00 50.00 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MTNGS 12/30/93 17406 CORONEL, ESEQUIEL 211.50 211.50 REIMB ABATEMENT PMT 12/30/93 17407 CPRS 217.00 217.00 REGISTRATION CPRS CONF 12/30/93 17408 CURTIS, JOHN E 50.00 50.00 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MTNGS 12/30/93 17409 DICKENS, ALDINE 25.00 25.00 COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNGS 12/30/93 17410 ELLSON, MARION 100.00 100.00 PLANNING COMMISSION MTNGS 12/30/93 17411 FRANCIS, SUSAN 25.00 25.00 COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNGS 12/30/93 17412 GILREATH, HELEN T 50.00 50.00 INVESTMENT ADV BRD MTNGS 12/30/93 17413 HARBISON, DAVE 50.00 50.00 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MTNGS /30/93 17414 KABUSHIKI KAISHA MARUKO 1,695.80 1,695.80 SENIOR CENTER RENT 1/94 12/30/93 17415 LEWIS, TOM 50.00 50.00 INVESTMENT ADV BRD MTNGS 100.00 PLANNING COMMISSION MTNGS 12/30/93 17416 MARRS, DONALD 150.00 50.00 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MTNGS 2.00- MONTHLY PERS SUR BNFT 55.89- MONTHLY MEDICAL INS 1/94 1.54- MONTHLY VISION INS 1/94 300.00 MONTHLY SALARY JAN 94 250.00 MONTHLY AUTO COMP JAN 94 12/30/93 17417 MC CARTNEY, MICHAEL 690.57 200.00 RDA AUTO 6 PHONE COMP 12/30/93 17418 NARD, NANCY 25.00 25.00 COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNGS 47.43 SURVIOR BNFT 12/31/93 12/30/93 17419 P.E.R.S. 13,553.94 13,506.51 REGULAR PERS 12/31/93 55.89- MONTHLY MEDICAL INS 1/94 1,000.00 MONTHLY SALARY JAN 94 250.00 MONTHLY AUTO COMP JAN 94 12/30/93 17420 PENA, JOHN 1,394.11 200.00- RDA AUTO 6 PHONE COMP 300.00 MONTHLY SALARY JAN 94 250.00 MONTHLY AUTO COMP JAN 94 12/30/93 17421 PERKINS, RONALD A. 750.00 200.00 RDA AUTO a PHONE COMP 12/30/93 17422 REGIONAL ACCESS PROJ FND 435.00 435.00 LIVNG FOR YOUR 90'S INSP 12/30/93 17423 RICE, FRED 50.00 50.00 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MTNGS 12/30/93 17424 SALES, BRUCE F 50.00 50.00 INVESTMENT ADV BRD MTNGS 12/30/93 17425 SEATON, B.J. 50.00 50.00 COMMUNITY SVC COMM MTNGS 2.00- MONTHLY PERS SUR BNFT 55.89- MONTHLY MEDICAL INS 1/94 1.54- MONTHLY VISION INS 1/94 300.00 MONTHLY SALARY JAN 94 250.00 MONTHLY AUTO COMP JAN 94 12/30/93 17426 SNIFF, STANLEY 690.57 200.00 RDA AUTO a PHONE COMP 12/30/93 17427 WILSON, DR JACK M 50.00 50.00 INVESTMENT ADV BRD MTNGS 000165 GL24U4 12/30/93 W A R R A N T R E G I S T E R PAGE 2 DATE OF WARRANT IN FAVOR OF CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION ISSUE NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 12/30/93 17428 WRIGHT, RANDALL L 50.00 50.00 DESIGN REVIEW BOARD MTNGS -------- ----- GRAND TOTAL DEMANDS--------- 26,668.04 ** 000166 GL33U4 1/10/94 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 1 DATE WARRANT PAYEE NUMBER GENERAL FUND CHECK AMOUNT 1/04/94 17433* COSPER, DAVID M 1,400.49 1/05/94 17435* UC REGENTS, UNIV OF CALIF 225.00 1/05/94 17436* LA QUINTA CHAMBER OF 92.00 1/07/94 17437* INN AT THE PARK 186.02 1/10/94 17440 A AND 8 COFFEE SERVICES 123.00 1/10/94 17441 A TO Z RENTAL CENTER 98.21 1/10/94 17443 ABLE RIBBON TECH 1,331.03 1/10/94 17444 ACE HARDWARE 113.47 1/10/94 17445 AFFILIATED SECURITY SERV 337.00 1/10/94 17446 ALBERTSONS FOOD CNTR 1627 489.26 1/10/94 17447 ARROW PRINTING COMPANY 452.38 1/10/94 17440 AT & T 52.41 1/10/94 17449 BAKER,FRED 14.49 1/10/94 17450 BANK OF AMERICA 61.39 1/10/94 17454 BSI CONSULTANTS INC 174.82. 1/10/94 17455 BUSINESS RECORDS CORP 182.21 1/10/94 17456 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 66.00 1/10/94 17457 CHANEY COMPANY, GEORGE H. 5,637.45 1/10/94 17458 CONNECTING POINT 289.85 1/10/94 17459 CORONA, CITY OF 59.00 1/10/94 17460 DESERT JANITOR SERVICE 451.32 1/10/94 17461 DESERT SUN, THE 1,734.99 1/10/94 17462 DOUBLE PRINTS 1 HOUR PHOT 7.77 1/10/94 17463 GASCARD INC - 30D16 478.81 1/10/94 17464 GASTON, GINGER 7.81 AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER 1,400.49 MOVING EXP/D COSPER 225.00 CODE REQ SEMINAR 30.00 MAYOR'S BREAKFAST 22.00 MAYOR'S BREAKFAST 10.00 MAYOR'S BREAKFAST 10.00 MAYOR'S BREAKFAST 10.00 MAYOR'S BREAKFAST 10.00 MAYOR'S BREAKFAST 186.02 LODGING CPRS/A DICKENS 123.00 COFFEE SUPPLIES 98.21 TBLCLTH/TABLES/URN/HOWL 1,331.83 LASER CARTRIDGES 2.36 BATTERIES 9.63 PEST CONTROL 53.33 DOOR STOPS/BRUSH/STRIPPER 48.15 TIES/TAPE/GLOVES 201.00 FIRE ALARM SVC 84.00 BURGLAR ALARM SVC 52.00 BURGLAR ALARM SVC 59.95 MEETING 109.17 HOLIDAY OPEN HOUSE 309.88 HOLIDAY OPEN HOUSE 2.89 TOWELS 7.37 SNR CNTR POT LUCK 219.81 ENVELOPES 163.74 WINDOW ENVELOPES 68.83 EMERGENCY CHR REQ FORMS 52.41 PHONE CORDS 14.49 MILEAGE/F BAKER 25.00 CREDIT CARD FEE 36.39 CREDIT CARD FEE & CHGS 174.82 PLAN CHECK 104.36 W-2 FORMS 77.85 1099 FORMS 33.40 UNIFORMS 33.40 UNIFORMS 5,637.45 PROF SVC/INSPECTION 289.85 ENVELOPE FEEDER 59.00 ANIMAL CONTROL TRAINING 451.32 JANITORIAL SVC/DEC 109.91 DESERT SUN SUBSCRIPTION 1,037.08 LEGAL ADVERTISING 588.00 LEGAL ADVERTISING 7.77 PHOTOS 238.09 GAS PURCR/DEC 183.86 GAS PURCH/DEC 56.86 GAS PURCH/DEC 7.81 MILEAGE/G GASTON 39.48 PHONE SVC/JAN 39.46 PHONE SVC/JAN 39.48 PHONE SVC/JAN 2,086.59 PHONE SVC/JAN 17.63 PHONE SVC/JAN 000167 GL33U4 1/10/94 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 2 DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 213.45 PHONE SVC/JAN 1/10/94 17465 GENERAL TELEPHONE 2,475.59 39.48 PHONE SVC/JAN 1/10/94 17469 HISPANIC HOTLINE 158.00 158.00 JOB ADVERTISEMENT 92.16 CODE PUBLICATIONS 1/10/94 17470 ICBO 135.08 42.92 CODE PUBLICATIONS 1/10/94 17472 JOBS AVAILABLE 93.60 93.60 JOB ADVERTISEMENT 1/10/94 17474 JUHOLA, SAUNDRA 51.20 51.20 COUNCIL SWEARING IN EVENT 1/10/94 17475 KEITH COMPANIES, THE 8,823.00 8,823.00 PROF SVC/JFFRSN ALIGNMENT 285.86 CONTRACT LABOR 1/10/94 17476 KELLY TEMPORARY SERVICES 734.26 448.40 CONTRACT LABOR 430.51 PHONE SVC/DEC 1/10/94 17478 LA CELLULAR TELEPHONE CO 485.77 55.26 PHONE SVC/DEC 1/10/94 17479 LICALSI, PAMELA 37.12 37.12 MILEAGE/LI CALII 1/10/94 17480 LOS ANGELES TIMES 15.36 15.36 LA TIME SUBSCRIPTION 1/10/94 17482 MARRIOTT 297.00 297.00 LODGING/CPRS CONF/SMITH 127.36 EMP SERVICE PLAQUES 1/10/94 17486 NOEL BRUSH AWARDS 182.66 55.30 EOM PLAQUE 296.64 CONTRACT LABOR 1/10/94 17407 NORRELL SERV INC 692.16 395.52 CONTRACT LABOR 1/10/94 17488 PALM DESERT COUNTRY CLUB 50.00 50.00 REC HALL/SNR CTR DANCE CL 98.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES 1/10/94 17490 PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS 117.10 18.92 THOMAS QUIDE 1/10/94 17491 QUILL CORPORATION 175.57 175.57 COMPTR ANTI GLARE FILTERS 1/10/94 17492 RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFFS 133,635.76 133,635.76 LAW ENFORCEMENT SVC 1/10/94 17493 RIVERSIDE, COUNTY OF 32.10 32.10 CASSETTE TAPES 1/10/94 17494 SMITH, MARILYN 175.00 175.00 TRAVEL ADVANCE/SMITH 1/10/94 17495 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO 22.43 22.43 GAS SVC/NOV 1/10/94 17496 SPRINT 574.91 574.91 PHONE SVC/DEC 3.92 NOTEBOOK 140.02 FILE CABINET _ 2.88 CALENDAR REFILL 3.92 PEN REFILLS 12.04 ORGANIZER 1/10/94 17497 SIEVES OFFICE SUPPLY 199.48 36.70 LABELS/PENS/DISKS 19,185.17 LEGAL SVC/GENERAL 1/10/94 17498 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON 26,859.85 7,674.68 LEGAL SVC/WYMER/ITM 1/10/94 17500 TARGET STORES 72.70 72.70 DOCUMENT FRAMES 150.00 CLEAN LOT/ARROHA/ALVARADO 165.00 CLEAN LOT/ALVARADO/MONTEZ 1/10/94 17501 TAYLOR AND SONS, STEVE 480.00 165.00 CLEAN LOT/DSRT CLB/VENTUR 1/10/94 17502 TIGER REPRO GRAPHICS 70.21 70.21 BOND PAPER 1/10/94 17505 UNDERGROUND SERVICE ALERT 273.00 273.00 USASC DUES 1/10/94 17506 VALLEY OFFICE EQUIPMENT 57.00 57.00 COPIER MAINT 162.30 CALENDARS/BINDERS 1/10/94 17507 VIKING 200.99 38.69 DESK PAD 1/10/94 17508 VIP EXPRESS 40.00 40.00 REF BUS LIC OVERPAYMENT 65.64 DEDICATION SUPPLIES 17.33 SUR CNTR POT LUCK 1/10/94 17509 VONS 93.66 10.69 PHOTOS 49.04 OIL/ANTIFREEZE 1/10/94 17510 WAL-MART STORES INC 68.59 19.55 VEHICLE REPAIR 1/10/94 17512 WELCH'S UNIFORM RENTAL 35.95 35.95 MATS 1/10/94 17513 WESCOM COMMUNICATIONS 76.41 76.41 INSTALL PHONE MODEM 99.13 INK CARTRIDGE 1/10/94 17514 XEROX CORPORATION 145.38 46.25 COPIER MAINT -------- TOTAL GENERAL FUND $191,704.67 000168 GL33U4 1/10/94 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 3 DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER STATE GAS TAX FUND 1/10/94 17442 A-1 RENTS 1/10/94 17444 ACE HARDWARE 1/10/94 17453 BIG A AUTO PARTS 1/10/94 17456 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 1/10194 17463 GASCABD INC - 30D16 1/10/94 17484 MUFFLER WORLD 1/10/94 17489 PARKSON PIPELINE MTRLS 1/10/94 17490 PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS 1/10/94 17499 SUSXI n SAKEMI MOWERS AND 1/10/94 17504 TOPS 6 BARRICADES INC -------- TOTAL STATE GAS TAX FUND CITY-WIDE ASSESSMENT DIST 89-1 1/05/94 17434* MONROVIA NURSERY COMPANY 1/10/94 17444 ACE HARDWARE 1/10/94 17453 BIG A AUTO PARTS 1/10/94 17456 CADET UNIFORM SUPPLY 1/10/94 17463 GASCARD INC - 30D16 1/10/94 17468 HIGH TECH IRRIGATION INC 1/10/94 17471 IMPERIAL IRRIGATION DIST 225.00 171.32 58.48- 76.52 565.60 69.02 55.76 2.14 120.46 15.62 $1,242.96 " 823.21 287.54 72.94 82.66 409.38 249.35 33.74 1/10/94 17483 MENTONE TURF SUPPLY 10,575.02 1/10/94 17484 MUFFLER WORLD 69.02 1/10/94 17489 PARKSON PIPELINE MTRLS 55.76 1/10/94 17490 PROFESSIONAL BUSINESS 2.14 1/10/94 17499 SUSKI 6 SAKEMI MOWERS AND 23.70 -------- TOTAL CITY-WIDE ASSESSMENT DIST 89 $12,684.46 225.00 CASE LOADER 32.62 BROOM/ANTIFREEZE/OIL 31.17 CLEAN-OUTS/TAPE 9.35 ABSORBENT/STAPLES 7.39 BRUSHES 34.29 PIPE 12.39 ANTIFREEZE 12.25 PROPANE 31.86 STRAINER/SOCKET/HAMMER 4.33 OIL SENDER/TRACTOR 36.76 OXYGEN/ARGON/GASKET MTRL 24.22 SHOCKS-TRK 1/TAIL PIPE-2 87.61- PARTS RETURNED 36.18- PARTS RETURNED 38.26 UNIFORMS 38.26 UNIFORMS 565.60 GAS PURCH/DEC 69.02 MUFFLER TRX M2 55.76 REPAIR WATER MAIN 2.14 DESK CALENDAR 120.46 CHAINS FOR CRAINSAW 15.62 FOUL WEATHER SUIT 823.21 PLANTS 88.59 PIPE/SHOVELS/TAPE 52.00 POWER CENTER/CLEANERS 62.41 SHOVEL/UTILITY TUB/BRUSH 42.44 GLUE/STAPLES/SCRAPER 42.10 PIPE/HAMMER/WIRE 36.76 OXYGEN/ARGON/GASKET MTRL 36.18 SHOCKS-TRK 1/TAIL PIPE-2 41.33 UNIFORMS 41.33 UNIFORMS 409.38 GAS PURCH/DEC 74.80 GORPER TRAPS 56.87 IRRIG @ CIVIC CNTR 25.86 PLANTING TABS 91.82 HOSE/SHRUBS 33.74 ELEC SVC/DEC 950.00 LANDSCAPE LMC 02 4,958.94 LANDSCAPE NORTH END 2,333.04 LANDSCAPE LMC O1 2,333.04 LANDSCAPE LMC O1 69.02 MUFFLER TRK 03 55.76 REPAIR WATER MAIN 2.14 DESK CALENDAR 23.70 EDGER BLADES 000163 INFRASTRUCTURE FUND GL33U4 1/10/94 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 4 DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION • NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 1/10/94 17503 TKD ASSOCIATES INC 555.80 555.80 PROF SVC/DESIGN 1/10/94 17511 WALLING 8 MCCALLUM ASSOC. 300.00 300.00 DESIGN -------- TOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE FUND $1,153.03 88-1 AGENCY FUND 1/10/94 17452 BANK OF AMERICA N T C 135.46 135.46 AGENT SERVICES 88-1 1/10/94 17485 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 451.65 451.65 ASSMNT DIST ADMN -------- TOTAL 88-1 AGENCY FUND $587.11 89-2 AGENCY FUND 1/10/94 17485 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 576.21 576.21 ASSMNT DIST ADMN -------- TOTAL 89-2 AGENCY FUND $576.21 90-1 AGENCY FUND 1/10/94 17485 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 601.72 601.72 ASSMNT DIST ADMN -------- TOTAL 90-1 AGENCY FUND $601.72 " 91-1 AGENCY FUND 1/10/94 17485 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 969.63 969.63 ASSMNT DIST ADMN -------- TOTAL 91-1 AGENCY FUND $969.63 * 92-1 AGENCY FUND 1/10/94 17485 MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES 768.22 768.22 ASSMNT DIST ADMN -------- TOTAL 92-1 AGENCY FUND $768.22 * RDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PA#1 1/10/94 17451 BANK OF AMERICA 1/10194 17457 CHANEY COMPANY, GEORGE H 1/10/94 17473 JP REPROGRAPHICS 1/10/94 17477 KENNO INC 1/10/94 17481 M N CAMERA 6 PHOTO 81,021.06 153.40 430.86 729,189.52 11.80 1/10/94 17498 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON 10,084.14 ------- TOTAL RDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PA# $820,890.78 RDA LOW/MOD FUND PA#1 26,043.90 KENKO CONST ESC #952-031 40,098.86 KENKO CONST ESC #952-031 14,878.30 KENKO CONST ESC #952-031 153.40 PROF SVC/INSPECTION 382.80 BLUEPRINTS 48.06 BLUEPRINTS 260,439.00 CONTRCTR/ST IMP 92-1 400,988.58 CONTRCTR/ST IMP 92-1 148,783.00 CONTRCTR/ST IMP 92-1 26,041.90- RETENTION TO ESCROW 40,098.86- RETENTION TO ESCROW 14,878.30- RETENTION TO ESCROW 11.80 PHOTOS 2,793.46 LEGAL SVC/52 EMNT DOMAIN 668.00 LEGAL SVC/GENERAL 85.00 LEGAL SVC/TURI 6,537.68 LEGAL SVC/WYMER/ITM 88.40 LEGAL Svc/GENERAL 1,241.56 LEGAL SVC/STOCKMAN 000170 GL33U4 1/10/94 WARRANT ACTIVITY BY FUND PAGE 5 • DATE WARRANT PAYEE CHECK AMOUNT ENCUMB DESCRIPTION NUMBER AMOUNT NUMBER 2,418.63 LEGAL SVC/CV LAND 1/10/94 17498 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON 9,760.83 6,012.24 LEGAL SVC/WILLIAMS/DSRT S -------- TOTAL RDA LOW/MOD FUND PAM1 $9,760.83 RDA CAPITAL PROTECTS PAM2 1/10/94 17457 CHANEY COMPANY, GEORGE H. 76.70 76.70 PROF SVC/INSPECTION 35,434.72 RETENTION PROG PMT 1,2,3 1/10/94 17466 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION CO 538,315.44 502,880.72 CONST WHTWTR/WASH BRIDGE 1/10/94 17467 HALL 6 FOREMAN INC 1,750.00 1,750.00 PROF SVC/ADAMS ST 182.85 LEGAL SVC/BURKETT 167.00 LEGAL SVC/GENERAL 1/10/94 17498 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON 2,027.35 1,677.50 LEGAL SVC/TUCKER -------- TOTAL RDA CAPITAL PROJECTS PAM2 $542,169.49 " RDA LOW/MOD FUND PAM2 1/10/94 17498 STRADLING YOCCA CARLSON 58.95 58.95 LEGAL SVC/GENERAL -------- TOTAL RDA LOW/MOD FUND PA42 $58.95 ` -------- ----- GRAND TOTAL DEMANDS--------- 1,583,168.06 '• TOTAL DEMANDS - 1/18/94 WARRANTS 1,583,168.06 TOTAL DEMANDS - 12/30/93 WARRANTS 26,668.04 PAYROLL 69,359.22 -------------- 1,679,195.32 .............. TOTAL DEMANDS - CITY FUNDS 236,956.05 PAYROLL 69,359.22 TOTAL CITY FUNDS ______________ 306,315.27 TOTAL DEMANDS - RDA FUNDS 1,372,880.05 GRAND TOTAL DEMANDS -------------- 1,679,195.32 000171 - M OF COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Approval of Change for Travel and Expense Policy to Provide for City Manager Approval of Travel when Timing does not allow for Council Review. AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 02 STUDY SESSION: BACKGROUND: The Travel and Expense Policy approved by Council on March 2, 1993 states, "Out -of -State travel, round trips over 300 miles, or trips involving overnight stay must be approved by the City Council." (page 2 of the attached) The proposed change, in bold type, authorizes the City Manager to approve travel if timing does not permit Council review. The change requires the City Manager to notify the Council of the action taken. This staff -level approval would occur most commonly when the Council is dark for budgeted travel that requires Council action. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Approve the change to the Travel and Expense Policy to provide for City Manager approval of travel when timing does not allow for Council review. Submitted by: Pamela LiCalsi Personnel & Budget Manager Signature Approved for submission to City Council: ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 00017w CITY OF LA QUINTA TRAVEL AND EXPENSE POLICY PURPOSE: To establish uniform guidelines for City officials and designated staff to follow with regard to travel and expense reporting that arises in the course of conducting City business. BACKGROUND: The City recognizes that attendance at meetings and conferences serves a vital forum for the exchange of ideas and methods in all areas of municipal administration, presenting and receiving information, and advocating legislation of benefit to the City. The governing factor in authorizing attendance at these functions is the tangible benefit to accrue to the City as a result of such attendance in relation to the overall expense to the City. To that end City employees and officials are occasionally required to expend City funds. This is accomplished either by requesting city funds in advance, city issued credit cards, or by spending one's own funds and requesting reimbursement from the City. Government Code Section 36514.5 authorizes reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of official duties. The following policies are intended to cover what should be reasonable expenses of business meetings and travel and the reporting thereof and may not be all inclusive. The reasonableness of any unforeseen situations will be decided upon by the City Manager for staff expenditures and by the City Council for elected and appointed officials expenditures. POLICY: 1. RESPONSIBILITY Authorizing officials have the administrative responsibility to determine the reasonableness of travel costs, as justified by the nature of travel. The intent is to adequately account for reimbursable expenses while each employee or official accomplishes essential City Travel as reasonably as possible. The City Manager shall administer the expenditure of travel funds in accordance with appropriations made by the City Council in the annual adopted budget, with the exception of the appropriations made for City Council Member's travel. 1 000173 It is the duty of each employee and official to exercise sound and reasonable judgement in the conduct of city travel. Personal and city travel must not be commingled in such a manner as to increase allowable expense or otherwise affect adversely the interest of the City. 2. TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION Official travel by City employees requires prior written authorization by the appropriate approving authority. The City form, "Travel Request and/or Advance", shall be used to document authorization. Travel trips of one -day or less shall not require a pre -approved "Travel Request and/or Advance" if no advance is requested, but the second part of the form covering conference update reporting must be completed, if applicable, upon return. Out-of-state travel, round trips over 300 miles, or trips involving overnight stay must be approved by the City Council. If timing does not permit Council approval, the City Manager may authorize the travel request. The City Manager shall notify the Council of the authorized travel and the circumstances which prevented Council review/approval. Upon return, the "Conference Update Report" section of the "Travel Request" form must be completed. 3. TRAVEL EXPENSES Employees and officials may provide their own funding and file claims for reimbursement, or may apply for an advance of public funds by utilizing the "Travel Request and/or Advance" form. All requests for advance of travel funds are to be submitted through the approving authority to the Finance Department at least five(5) working days before the intended date of departure. All advances must be properly accounted for upon termination of travel for which the advance was made. Advance payments do not constitute approval to spend the entire amount advanced. 4. ADVANCE RESERVATIONS --CANCELLATION Employees and officials are encouraged to make reservations for any meeting, convention, or dinner for which the City would bear the cost, which he or she is planning to attend, in sufficient time to allow for lower airfare or reservations costs to be obtained. Cancellations that result in expenditure of reviewed on a case -by -case basis by the City whether the employee may be held responsibl E e 0001'74 5. TRANSPORTATION Individuals requesting official travel should attempt to travel by the means most economical to the City. In selecting a particular method of transportation, consideration shall be given for the total cost to the city which will result; including overtime, lost work, and actual transportation costs. A. Automobile Travel Transportation by car may be done either with a personal vehicle or city vehicle. If a personal vehicle is used, net mileage will be reimbursed at the current city reimbursement rate. Net mileage equals roundtrip mileage minus any commute miles. Those persons using their own vehicle and receiving a monthly auto allowance, will be reimbursed only for the net mileage in excess of 60 miles. In any case, mileage will not be reimbursed for portions of the trip made for non -business related matters. When the use of public air carrier transportation is approved, private automobile use to and from the airport shall be reimbursed for all allowable miles at the city rate. Commercial auto rental will be allowed if necessary and alternative personal or public transportation is unavailable or unreasonable. B. Air Travel Air transportation will be acquired at the most economical fare available from the nearest airport. The advance purchase of airline tickets may be handled via a travel agent or directly through the individual airline. Airport parking is an allowable expense. Ground transportation, such as courtesy shuttle service, buses, taxis, or similar service may be utilized to and from airports. Any costs for such services are reimbursable. 6. LODGING Lodging shall be obtained at the most economical rate available for safe, clean, convenient, and quality accommodations. Factors such as proximity to destination and prevailing rates should be considered for reasonableness. Overnight stay is allowable if one day's travel time is burdensome. Conference headquarters hotels are encouraged as they reduce the costs of other modes of transportation between meetings and conference sites. 3 000175 A. Regular Lodging An employee is expected to make reservations well in advance whenever possible and to take other actions to ensure that lodging is secured at moderate rates. Lodging shall be limited to the minimum number of nights required to conduct the assigned city business. If an employee or official chooses to arrive earlier or stay later than the length of City business, the additional lodging and other expenses related to this decision are the individual's personal expenses. B. Family Member Accompaniment There is no objection to a spouse and/or other family member(s) accompanying an employee or official on a city business trip, provided that their presence does not detract from the performance of city duties. The attendance at the meetings and conferences by such family members of city employees and officials is to be considered a sole expense of the individual employee and/or official, and all differences in costs brought about by the attendance and/or accompanying travel of a family member shall not be borne by the City. 7. MEALS Meals, except for those included in the cost of the registration, are allowable at actual costs including reasonable tips and room service charges not to exceed $75 per day. Expense claims for meals including people other than the claimant shall include the following information: 1. Date expense incurred 2. Parties participating 3. Purpose of the meeting 8. OTHER ALLOWABLE EXPENSES A. Incidental transportation expenses; such as street car, bus, taxi and ferry fares; bridge, toll road and vehicle parking fees; B. Telephone and facsimile charges for official business; C. Personal telephone calls are allowable, not to exceed $25 per day; D. Fees and tips paid to waiters, porters, baggage handlers, bellhops, hotel maids, and other service personnel; 4 000176 E. Business related entertainment functions that are attended to promote City related business objectives are allowable, as long as detail is provided stating who attended and what subjects were discussed. 9. NON -ALLOWABLE EXPENSES Personal expenses are not allowable. These may include, but are not limited to: A. Barber and/or beauty shop charges B. Fines for traffic violations C. Private automobile repairs D. Expenses of any persons accompanying the employee or official on the trip(except as noted in Section 8(E)) E. Personal telephone calls (except as allowed in Section 8 (c) ) F. Purchase of personal items G. Fitness/Health Facilities 10. SETTLEMENT OF TRAVEL EXPENSES Travelers are responsible for the accurate preparation of their claims, and the responsibility of omission or commission cannot be shifted to another individual. A "Travel Expense Report" substantiated by receipts which verifies the claimed expenditures, must be submitted to the City Manager within five (5) work days after returning from the conference and/or trip. If an employee or official has drawn expense money in advance, a settlement must be made on the basis of actual expenses. If actual expenses exceed the advance, upon approval by the City Manager, said expenses will be reimbursed to the traveler by the Finance Department. If actual expenses do not exceed the expense advance received, said traveler shall return all unused portions of the expense advance to the Finance Department. To be reimbursed for travel expenditure, an employee or official must sign and submit a "Travel Expense Report" form and the "Conference Update Report" section of the "Travel Request" form. No reimbursement shall be made until the "Travel Expense Report" form and the "Conference Update Report" section of the "Travel Request" form has been properly executed and approved by the City Manager with the exception of City Council Members. Elected and appointed officials' travel expenditures will be reimbursed if they are within budgetary constraints, all proper forms have been completed and signed, and receipts are attached. The decision of the City Manager shall be final in all cases where conflicts of opinions on reimbursement or allowable expenses exist. For City Council Members and appointed officials, the decision of 5 000177 the council shall be final. PROCEDURES: There are two forms to be utilized for travel and expense reporting (see the examples following this section). The first form is the "Request for Travel and/or Advance" form. This form is comprised of two basic parts; Part 1 covers the authorization for travel and/or an advance, and Part 2 provides follow-up information on the event attended. The second form is the "Travel Expense Report" and is needed in order to create the proper audit trail necessary for recording the expenditure of City funds. "Recruest for Travel and or Advance" form: out of state travel, trips in excess of 300 miles, or trips that involve overnight stay must be approved by the City Council. Trips or conferences that do not fall into the above category may be approved by the appropriate department head, or by the City Manager in the case of department head or non -elected officials' requests. The City Manager authorizes his own travel or conferences when they do not fall into the Council approval category mentioned in the first paragraph. Part 1 of this form, "Authorization", must be completed prior to the trip or conference. Requests for cash advances are included in this part of the form. If no advances are requested and Council approval is not needed, this part of the form may be filled out upon completion of the trip or conference if the appropriate verbal authorization has been granted. All approved advance requests are to be submitted to Finance at least five(5) working days before being needed. The 2nd NCR copy of this form will remain with Finance as payment backup documentation. The original will be retained by the traveller until Part 2 is completed and submitted with the Expense Report. Advances and all other expenses must be reconciled and approved on the "Travel Expense Report" and submitted to Finance within five(5)working days after completion of the trip or conference. Part 2 of this form, Conference Update Report", is to be completed with a short narrative highlighting the subject of the conference and its relevance to City operations. This section must be completed when any conference expenses are incurred. The original "Request for Travel and/or Advance" form must be attached to the "Travel Expense Report" when that form is submitted. 6 n00i'78 "Travel Expense Report" form: The "Travel Expense Report" (referred to as the "expense report") is required to track all travel expenditures of the City. A proper audit trail, which includes supporting receipts, is necessary to comply with travel reporting requirements. The expense report that must be filled out is designed to be a logically grouped over -view of the total expenditures incurred while traveling. Detail and supporting documentation, including avel and/or Advance" form must be receipts and the "Request for Tr attached as backup to this expense report. There is some space provided on the form itself for explanation detail for any circumstances or situations that may need to be addressed. Meal and business entertainment receipts must identify names of who attended and what business matters were discussed. Itemized hotel bills are needed rather than, or in addition to, lump sum receipts. Monthly credit card bills are not to be used in lieu of the actual charge receipts. Expense items for which no receipts are available must be identified as such. The expense report is divided into three columns to cover whatever spending situations may occur. Column 1 is to contain allowable business expenses that the claimant has paid for personally, whether by personal credit card, check or cash. Cash advances become personal cash as soon as they are received from the City. Therefore, column 1 should be used when spending cash even if it was received from a City advance. The advance in such cases will also be listed in column 3 as a non - business expense of the City. When columns 1 and 3 are netted together the refund amount will be determined. The Expense Report should also be used for all mileage reimbursement claims whether conference related or not. Column 1 of the form shall be completed with appropriate detail. Column 2 is to contain all City paid expenses. These will primarily be City credit card expenses but may also include any checks or cash that were paid directly to the provider and were not received by the claimant as an advance. Such checks or cash paid directly may not always be readily determined, but the claimant needs to include these amounts to better reflect the total cost to the City. Totals from columns 1 and 2 should be added and the result placed in the "Total Trip Expense" box. 7 000179 Column 3 is to contain the amounts which were paid by the City either on check, cash, or credit card for items which are not reimbursable expenses. All efforts should be made not to use City funds for unallowable expenditures, but such situations are sometimes unavoidable. Any advances that the claimant receives, whether check or cash, must be picked up in this column. Advances are considered non -business expenditures by the City and are the property of the recipient. Allowable expenditures that occur in such cases are listed separately in column 1. The total from column 1 is subtracted from the total of column 3 and the balance is due the City. If that result is a negative balance, it is a balance due the claimant. The claimant must sign the expense report certifying its correctness. Council Member reports need only Council member signature. All other reports require City Manager and the appropriate department head signature approval. All expense reports will be kept in a segregated payable file whether money is due the claimant or not. Finance will verify credit card receipts with the expense report and then attach the receipts to the credit card billing as backup documentation. Any credit card billing received without receipts is not a reimbursable expense. Any personal charges incurred, or advances not reconciled, are considered a receivable to the City and may be deducted from any checks issued by the City to that individual after the five (5) day report filing deadline has expired. 8 090180 cet44 4Quixfw COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Temporary No Parking BUSINESS SESSION: Zones and Other Traffic Controls for — the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Golf CONSENT CALENDAR: Tournament STUDY SESSION: DEPARTMENT REPORT: SUMMARY: Consideration of a Resolution approving temporary no parking zones and also providing authorization for traffic controls to facilitate the movement of vehicular traffic. The Bob Hope Chrysler Classic will take place on February 16 through 20, 1994, inclusively. The following temporary no -parking zones will be established inclusively: 1. Jefferson Street, south from the All American Canal 2. 54th Avenue 3. Madison Street 4. One side of all streets in the Palmer Course Complex 5. Designating one-way traffic on Jefferson The proposed temporary no parking areas and traffic controls have been received by the Engineering Department, Fire Department, and the Sheriff's Department. No objections to the proposed Resolution have been received. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: No cost will be incurred by the City. The Classic provides and maintains all necessary signage. RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt Resolution #94- which provides for temporary no parking zones and traffic controls to facilitate the movement of vehicular traffic during the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic. Submitted by: TOM HARTUNG BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR Approved for submission to ty Council: ROBERT L. HUNT CITY MANAGER 000181 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING CERTAIN NO -PARKING ZONES ON JEFFERSON STREET, 54TH AVENUE, MA.DISON STREET, ON ONE SIDE OF ALL INTERNAL STREETS OF PALMER COURSE COMPLEX, DURING A SPECIAL EVENT TO BE HELD FEBRUARY 16, 1994, INCLUSIVE FEBRUARY 20, 1994 WHEREAS the City Council of the City of La Quinta that pursuant to Section 22507 of the California Vehicle Code, Section 12.32.010 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, the following temporary no -parking zones hereby are established, to be effective during the period of a special event to be held February 16, 1994, through February 20, 19934, inclusive: 1. Jefferson Street, south from the All American Canal, including P.G.A. Boulevard to its termination 2. 54th Avenue, east from the All American Canal to Madison Street 3. Madison Street, south to the City limits 4. One side of all streets in the Palmer Course Complex 5. Designating one-way traffic on Jefferson Street to facilitate the movement of traffic as determined by the City Engineer and Chief of Police of the City of La Quinta WHEREAS the above parking prohibitions shall be in effect at all times during the day or night when authorized signs are in place giving notice thereof. WHEREAS that pursuant to section 22651 of the California Vehicle Code and Subsection (n) of said Section 22651, the removal and "tow away" of vehicles parked or left standing in violation of the above parking prohibitions, hereby is authorized, provided that signs shall have been posted giving notice of the removal. PASSED, AND APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of January, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: John J. Pena City of La Quinta, CA 000182 ATTEST: Saundra L. Junola, City Clerk City of,La Quintal CA APPROVED AS TO FORM: STRADLING, YUCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH City Attorneys 000183 Tit�t 4 4 Q9,1gro COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 AGENDA CATEGORY: ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: Approval of Quitclaim Deed for Temporary Access Easement CONSENT CALENDAR: on Tract 25389 - Duna La Quinta STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: This tract, located at the southwest corner of Ave. 50 and Park Avenue, was originally developed by M.J. Brock & Sons and Homefed Communities, Inc. As a condition of the June 5, 1990 approval of the Tract Map, the developer was required to deed a parcel along Ave. 50 to the Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD). The parcel is to be used as a well site. To assist in on -site construction during the period before improvements were made to Ave. 50 and Park Avenue, the developer desired a temporary 41-foot wide construction access easement across the CVWD parcel (see attached drawing). The City required that the easement be dedicated to the City to insure that the easement would be eliminated when it was no longer necessary. CVWD has asked that the City release the easement. Community Bank (of Pasadena), which has assumed control of the subdivision, has given the City written consent to the release. The attached quitclaim deed, once executed, will release to CVWD any rights the City has to the easement. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approve release of the 41-foot-wide construction access easement shown across Lot Z of Tract Map 25389-1 and authorize staff to execute the quitclaim deed to the Coachella Valley Water District. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: Signature Robert L. Hunt City Manager 0 0 0-18 4 FB/fb a Portion of Tract 25389-1 Temporary Easement --AVEA1 LIE _a-p on.rFn — -- — - —J r 3 \ 9 -r 4 i0- 60' GC GO 60 60' 60. /60' 60 5 d l45 5 45.3 45 C44 e � 446---44 3 4a 43.0 Vf /o 6y 43.0 l �i m 0 � li I f -I to 109 108 107 10105 104 105 1 7 1 E I 6 1 � A D � 60 60 60 6C 60 I 60 60 i15 I 34—�44� 42.G\ 4. 42.,9 3. zn g0 ee — 2 1 o 60. CAE COURSE Zz� a 10 _ 41d I z i 3� a o c v v 3 r 1zQ / ao. _ — _ �_ 3G fl i Z \ \ 42.1 O \ � 0 41-7 3 0 10 /o �' \ � � l36 �0 !_l33 �a4\ �i o 241 41.5 ° � \ \J j 31 ! 41.G, ao.e o- � 25 60' O �• a5 i\"J �� / O. � ~ 4l6 1 e W i z.a I eo• - 135 u ` 26 0 15 \14 h o� �N I Go- C pp ,35 27 0 16 40-G- U- Zero �\ 41 co - 0 /O•Sroem oea/,v- Igo c 137 1 � \ '9GE� EfxEV7EN `T � u '0 76, 1; :01%711j c Z9 �^ 8i'017. _ 4�0�138 0. °o 30'' ° g o LOT 1 ao 407 1 led o P 6p. Q ' 1 /� yq 40.0 1SL�o 0. l 23 /I 1 GO 6p" 10_ ZS I� 6p. G3 1 1 a0.9 32 s le4 '" Its, f41 o h zs 3 o v 33 149 0 9i 1z� Ii 0 148 "� v ��� /O ."JTO.P/17 O,QA//J.4GE /O v y i!0 - ST0.2M 0.2AIfG6 V �5 V ,� .1 SOS �P 30� ass n 3O4 3r.. 10-« <3" c- �.r l •O 40 o O n 147 h 4 144w , 1 `536 , 0 (y C a) cz 0- A85 No Recording Fees Required Per Government Code Section 6103 WHEN RECORDED, MAIL TO: Coachella Valley Water District Post Office Box 1058 Coachella, CA 92236 MAIL TAX STATEMENTS TO: Coachella Valley Water District Post Office Box 1058 Coachella, CA 92236 SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER'S USE QUITCLAIM DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the City of La Quinta, a California Municipal Corporation, does hereby remise, release and forever quitclaim to Coachella Valley Water District, a Public Agency of the State of California, a 41-foot-wide access easement located along in, on, across, and through Lot "Z" of Tract 25389-1 located in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California., which said easement and lot are dedicated on the Final Map of said Tract as filed on the 16th day of July, 1990 in Book 221 of Maps, at Pages 30-37, Records of Riverside County, California. Executed this day of , 1994, at City of La Quinta, a California Municipal Corporation 22 Robert L. Hunt, City Manager MAIL TAX STATEMENTS AS DIRECTED ABOVE 0 018 s Twit rf' ('G'Qalxfw COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of Right of Way Parcels for Calle Tampico Cul de Sacs SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: Jr STUDY SESSION: Construction of cul de sacs at streets intersecting the vacated portion of Calle Tampico between Eisenhower Drive and Avenida Carranza requires acquisition of right of way parcels from nine adjacent properties. Under a contract amendment approved by the City Council on June 6, 1993, Realco Consultants has acquired the nine parcels. The parcels were deeded by the respective property owners in exchange for their receipt of portions of the vacated Calle Tampico. Attachment A depicts the right of way parcels and the vacated portions of Calle Tampico for which they were exchanged. Also attached are copies of the nine right of way deeds. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. RECOMMENDATION: APPROVED BY: Accept the nine deeds for Calle Tampico cul de sac right of way parcels and direct the City Clerk to record the documents. Submitted by: ^ ^� 0 Signature Approved for submission to City Council: ?Jq-A. -fit ­I� Robert L. Hunt City Manager FB/fb 000187 ATTACHMENT A Calle Tampico Cul de Sac Right of Way Parcels Acquired Right of Way Parcels Right of Way Vacated (to Adjacent Properties) PARCEL / CALLE PARCEL2 S. 89.57'00' d oQ 79.95' 80.06, 79.95' 80.05 ;a W1� W 2 cQi a30' I I rf 1K ELK. I 73 I Q � ' 30' 30' � 77 !3I >'1, _ SA r�� CAFiMr L1Tr1\ AT VAL 1 UN 1T NO. 9 ,ail, AR SCALE I " - 100' E 0: 80.05' Q W �W a d Z0: W .4 Z W W I l ! 1 , 30' 30 N PARCEL 4 S.89.57'001%E. QO pv W —J 70 i 30 3dI S9 j PARCEL 3 TAMPICO �— _L_.. w J Q O 79.95' a: OW 7� W W _J O J �y� I� 30' 30 1 . / 1 1 w N L,A QUINTA 18169 PARCEL 5 000188 RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF LA QUINTA P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 (Space above for Recorder's Use) Documentary Transfer Tax is None Exempt from Recording Fee Public Agency Exempt (R & T Code) Per Govt. Code Sec. 6103 Right of Way Parcel No. 5 Calle Tampico Vacation APN 773-062-023 (Portion) EXECUTOR'S DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, JAMES HIGGINS, Executor of the Estate of Linda Babior, deceased, does hereby remise, release, and forever quitclaim to THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, a Municipal Corporation, the real property in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California, described as: That portion of Lot 1 in Block 72 of Santa Carmelita at Vale La Quinta Unit No. 9, as shown on map thereof on file in Book 18, page 69, of Maps, Records of the County Recorder of said County, lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 1, said corner being a point in the westerly line of Avenida Vallejo, 60 feet wide, as shown on said map; Thence North 18°38'28" West a distance of 62.71 feet to a point in the northerly line of said lot, said point being the westerly terminus of the curved northeasterly line of said lot, said curved northeasterly line being a tangent curve, concave southwesterly, having a radius of 20 feet and a length of 31.37 feet. Containing 507 Square Feet, more or less IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed this of DEcE-NkQEV,, , 1993. I�f day This conveyance is made pursuant to the powers conferred by order of the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles Case No. BP 024103, filed Oct. 13, 1993 James Hig i, Executor 000189 Paqe 1 of 2 3 STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS. COUNTY OF IV, f igf-I I On la—[ t A 3 ,before me, EUSiLWAN a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared �:,J DmILS lla18 t wa3 personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person($) whose name(A) is/age subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/sAe/toty executed the same in his/4dr/their authorized capacity(�S), and that by his/h,Er/their signatureo) on the instrument the person($), or entity upon behalf of which the person(sr) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature OFF!C!AL NOTARY SEAL ELLEN LANGANJPNOtary Public— Ca!!forn!a LOS ANGELES COUNTY My Comm. Expres MAR 27.1995 (space above for seal) rrarraaararraarraaarraarrasaaaaa•aarrarrra rraarrrarrataraaarrraaaraaaaarrrr CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF EXECUTOR'S DEED This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the attached Executor's Deed dated from James Hioa!ns Executor of the Estate of Linda Babior, deceased to The City of La Quinta, a Municipal Corporation, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council, and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: The City of La auinta By: City _ er . Page 2 of 2 0gr)1`30 4 31- ��sZ;IG'L • cn Cl) a D r a m o 7 59.47' n o V W -L o o o N. NN W 7 C� 111 miNT Of BEG/NN/NCr\,, AVENIDA VALLEJO l— I h n r Z n O M u u �\O00 v 30" 30' 0001915 RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF LA QUINTA P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Documentary Transfer Tax is None Public Agency Exempt (R & T Code) GRANT DEED (Space above for Recorder's Use) Exempt from Recording Fee Per Govt. Code Sec. 6103 Calle Tampico Street Vacation R/W Parcel Nos. 1, 3, 6, 9, and 10 APNS 773-061-001 . 773-061-012, 773-063-001 773-064-012, and 773-065-001 (Portions) FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, HENRY C. GRISWOLD hereby grants and conveys to THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, a Municipal Corporation, the real property in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California, described as: Those portions of Lot 1 in Block 69, Lot 1 in Block 70, Lot 22 in Block 71, and Lots 1 and 22 in Block 73, all of Santa Carmelita at Vale La Quinta Unit No. 9, as shown on map thereof on file in Book 18, page 69, of Maps, Records of the County Recorder of said County, described in the rider attached hereto, marked "Exhibit A" and, by this reference, incorporated herein. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed this 3 j day of tAr wS 1993. _ C 73nry C. Gr� is'wo dT- 00019? Page 1 of 2 6 STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS. COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE On 3/ /`%%a before me, DeeVj. F L3l^0Grr4 a Notary Public in and for said State, personal) appe red Ilertt v C C�+r ls'1J0( i personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person* whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/3lwthw executed the same in his/law/tWir authorized capacity(40, and that by his/hw/tUoir signatures) on the instrument the person(af, or entity upon behalf of which the person(# acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL '>C DAVID F BROWN n NRIVERSIDECOUNTYia 52rlaf No. 93-7-/2- (space above for seal) faM+4i44a#a44a4+a##4+4+#4aa4i4i+a4aaaaa4a4+#+4a#4#4+i#+##4++##44++i l4#aa4aa CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the attached Grant Deed dated from Henry C. Griswold to The City of La Quinta, a Municipal Corporation, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council, and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: The City of La Quinta By: City Clem 000193 Page 2 of 2 7 EXHIBIT A Parcel 1: That portion of Lot 22 in Block 73 of Santa Carmelita at Vale La Quinta Unit No. 9, as shown on map thereof on file in Book 18, page 69, of Maps, Records of the County Recorder of said County, lying westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 22, said corner being a point in the easterly line of Avenida Carranza, 60 feet wide, as shown on said map; Thence North 18028'57" East a distance of 62.95 feet to a point in the northerly line of said lot, said point being the easterly terminus of the curved northwesterly line of said lot, said curved northwesterly line being a tangent curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of 20 feet and a length of 31.46 feet. Containing 512 Square Feet, more or less Parcel 3: That portion of Lot 1 in Block 73 of Santa Carmelita at Vale La Quinta Unit No. 9, as shown on map thereof on file in Book 18, page 69, of Maps, Records of the County Recorder of said County, lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 1, said corner being a point in the westerly line of Avenida Ramirez, 60 feet wide, as shown on said map; Thence North 18035'12" West a distance of 62.88 feet to a point in the northerly line of said lot, said point being the westerly terminus of the curved northeasterly line of said lot, said curved northeasterly line being a tangent curve, concave southwesterly, having a radius of 20 feet and a length of 31.37 feet. Containing 509 Square Feet, more or less Parcel 6: That portion of Lot 22 in Block 71 of Santa Carmelita at Vale La Quinta Unit No. 9, as shown on map thereof on file in Book 18, page 69, of Maps, Records of the County Recorder of said County, lying westerly of the following described line: EXHIBIT A (Page 1 of 2) 000194 91 EXHIBIT A Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 22, said corner being a point in the easterly line of Avenida Vallejo, 60 feet wide, as shown on said map; Thence North 18°35'15" East a distance of 62.61 feet to a point in the northerly line of said lot, said point being the easterly terminus of the curved northwesterly line of said lot, said curved northwesterly line being a tangent curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of 20 feet and a length of 31.46 feet. Containing 509 Square Feet, more or less Parcel 9: That portion of Lot 1 in Block 70 of Santa Carmelita at Vale La Quinta Unit No. 9, as shown on map thereof on file in Book 18, page 69, of Maps, Records of the County Recorder of said County, lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 1, said corner being a point in the westerly line of Avenida Velasco, 60 feet wide, as shown on said map; Thence North 18144'47" West a distance of 62.37 feet to a point in the northerly line of said lot, said point being the westerly terminus of the curved northeasterly line of said lot, said curved northeasterly line being a tangent curve, concave southwesterly, having a radius of 20 feet and a length of 31.37 feet. Containing 504 Square Feet, more or less Parcel 10: That portion of Lot 1 in Block 69 of Santa Carmelita at Vale La Quinta Unit No. 9, as shown on map thereof on file in Book 18, page 69, of Maps, Records of the County Recorder of said County, lying westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 1, said corner being a point in the easterly line of Avenida Velasco, 60 feet wide, as shown on said map; Thence North 18041'36" East a distance of 62.27 feet to a point in the northerly line of said lot, said point being the easterly terminus of the curved northwesterly line of said lot, said curved northwesterly line being a tangent curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of 20 feet and a length of 31.46 feet. Containing 505 Square Feet, more or less EXHIBIT A (Page 2 of 2) 000195 rn ,OE' "Or 0 , of ,99.69 gh -1q h `4 —, 0 0 � �s'gz•8� v s6 �9 .9/Y/NNI-99P Ltt rti --401N/G6f —t IZO *6�• M,IFz,sO,ON z° VZNVHHVD _ w dQIN3AV % (� r ( ` ( 1 \I \/ G jI U 7 I l� \JCJ j •• O III < i U N W W Ce U W N O oFL V a �o w <'> J Cm J v o z O U J a W Ir 00019E SO.O N P 0.18, z3aiwda _ VOI N3Ad, W � O .. p �II III I W r < Y U V7 '-40l/YIOd LLl C) i� L % S; DG I 3�3 N i M W z Ui Z Q y aW Q � O U 0 a V w z W Q cr y y O O a U a �cL a W cn 0 J rn Q z> z V m 2 Z W W cc o U o 000197 df OS F- Z < F<- U J } (n = .J U O > Z J 2 Q � � U 11 or n 0 Oi h Q6 O£' BOG IV4 V7 03 Nn Q� pp�O e"• U\, VN/NN/`»P tLI CQ �dO JN/Od 1 ,o _ Z or3lldn _ w V0 ( N 3 A ttl � ICLJI p� tip �.� .. p W r J < a M i 0 c ZaN > W LLI .J C (3azQ w z a W ►- Q Q, U H0 0 oCC V a i Q o � om Wo,�_ J � Q vo.. z> z m u z i w w� MIDI 0 0 0 Vl Y— z < U w z Z J L) .<d O > Z J 01 UJ Q S i 4A Le of of 0 5 7 C 4 CQ —1 LL, C I Q+ i NOOSV13n __ b01 N 3 AV . �O 0"7a1 G iN.cz,50.0N 60 akv% ,C?a 6?- �41�E' 1 9N/NN/929 LLl 0 5,18 d01N/ad 7:. J � Q N uOjR o V r' Z ►� O L S; 3G i t -OE I ,oei I«•ss ., p 'Ill' w w fli/I < It III in 0 o zo Q J W O U U G J W z IL W U wu a H w NN O Q ¢ ITT U a a Q ,io a W MLL J � U o Z Z c� v z , z w J 3 J w = C 2oGC V) 000199 0 Z < F U w Z Z Z U J > O > Z J Q cc2 ,cc I ,OE ,OF 0 FL s 63 S 0 �o S��G IS i e4 LLj rci If 'c ,,4 ♦ — \ �^ ?N7*9 ,50,0'N O ►• -13A nc V �- OOS V�../ ob 2 _ VGiN3A`d, J y < CC) W C~ < J a U o/L ,OF p W V. < Y C) N l 0 c Q J Q P Z W to UJ > w Z a > v w Q itW N `f 0 o¢ 0 a i Fa•o � �a � U. o) Ci O .. F U J W W Z Z J U d > O > Z J 2 ¢�0 U 000200 1A I- RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF LA QUINTA P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Documentary Transfer Tax is None Public Agency Exempt (R & T Code) GRANT DEED (Space above for Recorder's Use) Exempt from Recording Fee Per Govt. Code Sec. 6103 Right of Way Parcel No. 4 Calle Tampico Vacation APN 773-062-001 (Portion) FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, EMILY OVERSTREET hereby grants and conveys to THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, a Municipal Corporation, the real property in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California, described as: That portion of Lot 22 in Block 72 of Santa Carmelita at Vale La Quinta Unit No. 9, as shown on map thereof on file in Book 18, page 69, of Maps, Records of the County Recorder of said County, lying westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 22, said corner being a point in the easterly line of Avenida Ramirez, 60 feet wide, as shown on said map; Thence North 18°32'05" East a distance of 62.78 feet to a point in the northerly line of said lot, said point being the easterly terminus of the curved northwesterly line of said lot, said curved northwesterly line being a tangent curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of 20 feet and a length of 31.46 feet. Containing 511 Square Feet, more or less IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed this � C. day of 1993. t mi y Overstreet 000201 Page 1 of 2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS. COUNTY OF Los elrael-es .) On �ol- �- c13 11 personally appeared _ known t e (or proved name is are subscribe execute he same in his the instrument the pers( instrument. WITNES - mmyy hand efore me, A 4K A- N077Dt4 , a Notary Public in and for said State, _ r1f& - personally to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence o be the personjat: hose q the within instrument and acknowledged t e that he/they e�i /y their authorized capacity(ies), and that by hi a /their signatur�on rti�S}, or entity upon behalf of which the perso acted, executed the seal. 1��INII VIJ `I am My . Fxdr« OCT 1,199M { Sr e e 1a Nrlicle)sP 00y ne vote (A)rI 4E' 5e57 (space above for seal) rrrwrrrrrwwrrrwrwwwrwrwrwrww++www+w••++rw+rr•:wrwwrrrrrrrrw•rrrrrrrrw:rrrr• CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the attached Grant Deed dated from Emily Overstreet to The City of La Quinta, a Municipal Corporation, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council, and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: The City of La Quinta By: City Clerk Page 2 of 2 000202 al .� 8V r = 0 (G > m e 0 0 0 > > O Z y m < c c> > > a z . rn 0 Cn 30 < BLOCK w Q In r — �. N p (5 (o `i M O O CM > p ` `w AVENIDA m _ � RAMIREZ _ 0 o N.0'05'23ow. A PO/NT OF q] lr1 BEG/NN/NG 805 2� o� V U i cn O BL DCK 72 -- - 30� 30' 30< 000203 17 RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF LA QUINTA P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Documentary Transfer Tax is None Public Agency Exempt (R & T Code) GRANT DEED (Space above for Recorder's Use) Exempt from Recording Fee Per Govt. Code Sec. 6103 Right of Way Parcel No. 8 Calle Tampico Vacation APN 773-064-001 (Portion) FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, JACK McKINLEY WILSON and MAJEL A. WILSON hereby grant and convey to THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, a Municipal Corporation, the real property in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California, described as: That portion of Lot 22 in Block 70 of Santa Carmelita at Vale La Quinta Unit No. 9, as shown on map thereof on file in Book 18, page 69, of Maps, Records of the County Recorder of said County, lying westerly of the following described line: Beginning at the southwest corner of said Lot 22, said corner being a point in the easterly line of Avenida Herrera, 60 feet wide, as shown on said map; Thence North 18°38'25" East a distance of 62.44 feet to a point in the northerly line of said lot, said point being the easterly terminus of the curved northwesterly line of said lot, said curved northwesterly line being a tangent curve, concave southeasterly, having a radius of 20 feet and a length of 31.46 feet. Containing 507 Square Feet, more or less IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed this day ofSi, 1993. Jack McKinley Wi n el A. Wilson Page 1 of 2 000204 STATE OF E,44--�S SS. COUNTY OF flWERIStIM On 1�,�,3 before a Notary Public in and for said State, personally p�peared K + me .n 1 w�\s , personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the personls) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Signature (space above for seal) ++++rrarr+raaarwrarrwwr+r++rwwra+rwrrwrawrwrrarrarrwrawrrar+raarr rrrra r++++ CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the attached Grant Deed dated from Jack McKinley Wilson and Maael A Wilson to The City of La Quinta, -aMunicipal Corporation, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council, and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: The City of La Quinta By: City Clerk 00020'a Page 2 of 2 , 0� I JOE � l l'69 � Si�G I� GI_ 0 ogo Z-� �0 Cl W /" � 4 N �1 % � �l LL y y y y a aW hi W Q U OF ,OE "s2 vim, r>NIMI.999 Lt1 �n 8js 1 ��01N/Gt� 1 CQ �~ .£/'6E— M,r^1,go, 0 N i O da3aa3H ` 0IN3AV R ttl () i, U w 6 J NLn Q W Z W H H _ I W J Q •�°� W Z CL LU Q H� 0 o cV a i d W � J � Q 000206 y F Z < U J W W Z Z J Z O >_ Z Cr ¢�0 20 NORMAN L. VETTER JOHN 1. LOY RAYMOND F. FEIST, JR. ALAN H. BURSON HENRY R. HAGUE JOHN M. HANSEN LISA FRAZEE MORGOSH JAY J. BROWN Mr. David F. Brown REALCO CONSULTANTS 11919 Ivy Lane Moreno Valley, CA 92557 LAW OFFICES FEIST, VETTER, KNAUF AND LOY A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 610 MISSION AVENUE, SUITE 300 POST OFFICE BOX 240 OCEANSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92049-0240 TELEPHONE 16191 722-1914 August 24, 1993 Re: Deed relating to Vacation of Calle Tampico, La Quinta Dear Mr. Brown: RAYMOND F. FEIST 1916-1988 ROBERT C. KNAUF 1920.1979 TELECOPIER (619) 721-B943 Enclosed herewith is the original of the deed to the City of La Quinta for a portion of Mrs. Winfrey's lot on the corner of Tampico and Herrera. The City of La Quinta is only authorized to record this when the City has received similar deeds from all of the lots adjoining Tampico on the South from Velasco through Can -am and the City Resolution vacating Tampico has been formally adopted and recorded with the County Recorder. Very truly yours, FEIST, VETTER, KNAUF AND LOY John I. Loy JIL\km Enclosure cc: Mrs. Winfrey 000207 RECORDED AT THE REQUEST OF AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: CITY CLERK CITY OF LA QUINTA P.O. Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Documentary Transfer Tax is None Public Agency Exempt (R & T Code) GRANT DEED (Space above for Recorder's Use) Exempt from Recording Fee Per Govt. Code Sec. 6103 Right of Way Parcel No. 7 Calle Tampico Vacation APN 773-063-012 (Portion) FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, ELAINE R. WINFREY, Trustee of the William C. and Elaine R. Winfrey 1993 Family Trust, Established March 13, 1993, hereby grants and conveys to THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, a Municipal Corporation, the real property in the City of La Quinta, County of Riverside, State of California, described as: That portion of Lot 1 in Block 71 of Santa Carmelita at Vale La Quinta Unit No. 9, as shown on map thereof on file in Book 18, page 69, of Maps, Records of the County Recorder of said County, lying easterly of the following described line: Beginning at the southeast corner of said Lot 1, said corner being a point in the westerly line of Avenida Herrera, 60 feet wide, as shover. on said map: Thence North 18141'37" West a distance of 62.54 feet to a point in the northerly line of said lot, said point being the westerly terminus of the curved northeasterly line of said lot, said curved northeasterly line being a tangent curve, concave southwesterly, having a radius of 20 feet and a length of 31.37 feet. Containing 505 Square Feet, more or less 11V WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument has been executed this 9 day of W 1993. Elaine R. Winfrey,jrust Page 1 of 2 000208 STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS. COUNTY OF c GF- On before me, �d/fiN LOy a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared 1, 1J )W X personally known to me (or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence) to be the person(s) whose name(s) is/are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he/she/they executed the same in his/her/their authorized capacity(ies), and that by his/her/their signature(s) on the instrument the person(s), or entity upon behalf of which the person(s) acted, executed the instrument. OFFICIAL SEAL JOHNI.LOY NOTARY PUBLIC CAUFORNIA p PRINCIPAL OFFICE IN SAN OIEGO COUNTY Ny CanN.wfon E�IIa aept.15,199i (space above for sea[) CERTIFICATE OF ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED This is to certify that the interest in real property conveyed by the attached Grant Deed dated from Elaine R. Winfrey. Trustee to The City of La Quinta, a Municipal Corporation, is hereby accepted by order of the City Council, and the grantee consents to the recordation thereof by its duly authorized officer. Dated: The City of La Quinta By: City Clerk Page 2of2 000209 n O U IL M Fa- N •homq moo: W" O� ,o oh J U o.1r, ,oE M,,vo".90, O iV \.r LL 6F 5. 5 V/ -1 V83882 H ba 1 N 3 AV, _ �4NINNIP99 1 , :2101N/CCI tLl p u �— o Zl 7, 71J� �u i .. p W r J < " U t2 < F<- U w N Z J U > O Z J Q 000ziocc � 24 �T a Q• � o � s COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Acceptance of the La Quinta Employee's Association's Donation of A Weight Machine and Treadmill AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: (O STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: The La Quinta Employee's Association is offering to donate a weight machine and treadmill to the City (Exhibit A and Attachment 1). The equipment comes with all of the necessary manuals/instructions for proper use. In addition, staff recently implemented exercise training guidelines for (any) all of the exercise equipment. The guidelines (Attachment 2) include a Release and Waiver for Use of Equipment Form (Hold Harmless Agreement). FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended the City Council adopt Resolution No. 94- accepting the La Quinta Employee's Association's donation of a weight machine and treadmill for use by all City employees. Submitted by: Approved for submission to Robert L. Hunt, City Council: City Manager sighature ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000211 RESOLUTION NO. 94 - A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING A GIFT WHEREAS, the La Quinta Employee's Association has generously donated the equipment specified in the attached Exhibit A. WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the City to accept the donation. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby RESOLVE as follows: 1. The City of La Quinta hereby accepts the equipment listed in Exhibit "A". PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this day of 1994 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, CA JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, CA APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney Stradling, Yocca, Carlson & Rauth 0002121 EXHIBIT A 1. Weight Machine: Para Body EX350 Universal Machine 2. Treadmill: Pro Form 920 000213 ATTACHMENT 1 lfffenla (FmAIOYOO'a t44.4.0cfW 410" 78105 CALLE ESTADO - LA OUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564.2246 December 28, 1993 Robert L. Hunt City Manager City Council Members Dear Mr. Hunt and Honorable Council Members: This letter is to inform you that the 1993 L.Q.C.E.A. would like to donate two pieces of exercise equipment to the La Quinta Civic Center for the use by all City employees. If you have any questions, please let me know. Sincerely, Bruce Pelletier President La Quinta City Employee Association 000214 ATTACHMENT 2 I_ r / � i fMOFTN�J M E M O R A N D U M TO: All City Employees �, FROM: Robert L. Hunt, City ManagerwT DATE: November 23, 1993 SUBJECT: Employee Use of Exercise Equipment iu the Health Room. In the ensuing months, the City will be accepting donations of certain conditioning equipment for the health room. This equipment is for the use of City of La Quinta employees and elected officials only. No individual may utilize the equipment until they have reviewed the appropriate equipment guidelines (instruction manual, video tape, etc.). The attached Acknowledgement and Hold Harmless Agreement must be signed prior to the use of any equipment (copies available in the City Manager's Office). The equipment will be available from 7 a.m. to 7 p.m., Monday through Friday (excluding holidays). Hours are subject to change without prior notification. RLH:pjs CC: City Council 00021) TvT 4 4 09mm 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 922 0 FAX (619) 777-71010 RELEASE and WAIVER for USE of EQUIPMENT I have reviewed the exercise training guidelines for all of the exercise equipment. I am capable of utilizing, in a safe manner, the equipment in the health room without further instruction. I acknowledge the fact that the facilities will be used on my own time and that any injury resulting from those activities will not be covered by the City's workers' compensation program. I hereby waive, release and indemnify the City from any claim brought by myself or a third party relating to or arising out of my operation or use of the health room equipment. Employee's Signature Date Personnel File Date 000216 t MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 - LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 �; _ 0 0� IvcoRPOR TM OF T� HEALTH ROOM INFORMATION/GUIDELINES 000217 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION I IMPORTANT RULES TO REMEMBER 2 EXERCISE GUIDELINES 3 SETTING UP A TRAINING PROGRAM 4 HOW MUSCLES WORK 5 CONCEPTS RELATED TO TRAINING 6 EFFECTS OF TRAINING 7 APPENDIX A - WORKOUT CIRCUIT 000218 INTRODUCTION Provided for your review are various documents that will assist you in the. proper use and training for the maximum benefit of the health room. Provided is a listing of some important rules to remember prior to starting your health program. Additionally provided are exercise guidelines and information on how to set up a training program, how muscles work, anatomical movements, concepts related to training, and the effects of a training program. Each piece of equipment in the health room has specific instructional brochures and guidelines. It is required that employees read the specific brochures and directions for use of the equipment and sign the required acknowledgement and hold harmless agreement before using of any equipment in the facility. 000211 1 IMPORTANT RULES TO REMEMBER: 1. Consult with your physician and obtain proper instruction. This is especially important for persons over 35 or individuals with pre-existing health conditions. 2. Carefully inspect equipment for frayed, worn or loose parts. If in doubt about its condition or proper use, do not use the equipment. Any equipment improperly used or maintained can cause serious injury. 3. stay clear of weights and moving parts, and keep others at a safe distance. If any part becomes jammed, obtain qualified assistance. Do not attempt to free any part by yourself as it may suddenly dislodge. 00024'0 2 EXERCISE GUIDELINES BODY TEMPERATURE: It is important to warm up before workouts, to keep the body warn during workouts, and to cool -down slowly after workouts. WARM-UP: Ease into workouts by doing light, calisthenic stretching exercises to limber up the muscles. The purpose is to increase flexibility, and not to create strain. Keep these points in mind when stretching: • DO ALL STRETCHES SLOWLY... CONCENTRATING ON KEEPING MUSCLES RELAXED AND "LOOSE." • DO NOT FORCE STRETCHING ACTION. • DO NOT BOUNCE WHILE STRETCHING. STAY WARM: Do not cool off between exercises. Rest between exercises should not exceed two minutes. As you progress into better physical condition, this should be shortened to one minute or less. BREATHE normally through the mouth while exercising, do NOT hold your breath beyond the one or two seconds necessary at the start or peak exertion of an exercise. Inhale prior to the hardest part of the motion so you have a chest full of air before exertion. Hold the breath for only a second or two during the heaviest exertion. Exhale during the completion of the motion. Perform your exercises with a minimum of rest between sets. This will create an oxygen debt which is satisfied by greater blood circulation demands upon the lungs. POSITION your body when exercising so you are comfortable and well- balanced. In standing exercises your feet should be in line and about shoulder -width apart. To maximize contraction, look upward when exercising muscles on the back of the body and look downward when exercising muscles on the front of the body. Always lift close to your body and be evenly balanced throughout the entire movement. 000221 3 SETTING UP A TRAINING PROGRAM Personal goals - Every individual who begins an exercise program does so with the intention of achieving some sort of benefit from the activity. Most individuals who enter a resistive -training program wish to improve one of the following parameters; strength, muscle size, muscle "tone" or weight reduction. Increasing strength and muscle size - The best way to increase both the size and strength of muscle is to do resistive exercises. The best type of program for this goal is to use heavy weights and few repetitions. For example, a weight heavy enough so that you would only be able to do 3 - 5 repetitions. Increasing muscle "tone" - The best type of program for this goal would be one of light weights and many repetitions. For example, a weight light enough to be able to do 15 - 20 repetitions. Setting up a schedule - It is recommended that a resistive exercise training program be done every other day. The reason for alternating days is to allow protein synthesis to occur and any residual soreness to fade away. The actual time spent during each training session will vary. Exercises should be varied during the session so that specific muscles will have a chance to recover for subsequent lifts. For example, after doing an arm exercise you could do a lower body exercise. Specificity - Remember your goals. If you wish to develop your upper arms, you should concentrate on doing exercises for that area of the body. While a complete repertoire (exercises for all muscle groups) is recommended, it is your body and you should do what you originally set out to do. 000222, 4 HOW MUSCLES WORK The skeletal muscles of the human body comprise 250 of the total bod., •.weight. The most abundant tissue in the body, the main function of the skeletal muscles is to contract and create movement. There are three general classifications of muscular contractions: Isometric - This is actually a static contraction. The muscle develops tension but does not change in length, which means that no motion occurs. Isotonic - In this type, movement occurs and muscles length changes. This can be further divided into two categories: 1. Concentric - This is the classic type of muscle contraction where the muscle develops tension, shortens and thus causes movement to occur. Examples of this type of contraction would be lifting a weight off the floor, or pushing a weight overhead. 2. Eccentric - A classic example of an eccentric contraction would be during the down phase of a pull-up. Running downhill would also be an example of eccentric work. In this situation the muscle develops tension, but instead of shortening, the muscle fiber lengthens as the external weight of force overcomes the tension developed in the muscle. ANATOMICAL MOVEMENTS Flexion - Flexion refers to limbs coming together, such as elbow Flexion In which the hand is lifted toward the shoulder, as in doincT curls. Elbow flexion affects the biceps muscle, knee flexion affects the hamstring, and hip flexion affects the abdominal muscles. Extension - Extension refers to the opposite of flexion in which the hand moves away from the shoulder, as in doing triceps exercises. Elbow extension affects the triceps muscle, knee extension affects the quadriceps and gluteal muscles, and back extension affects the muscles of the lower back. Abduction - Abduction refers to the movement of a limb away from the trunk, such as in the illustration of arm abduction. Arm abduction affects the deltoid and other muscles of the shoulder, leg abduction affects the quadriceps and other muscles of the hip joint. Adduction - Is the movement of the limb toward the body, such as illustrated for leg adduction. Arm adduction affects the latissimus dorsi muscle, leg adduction affects the muscles of the inner leg. 5 000223 CONCEPTS RELATED TO TRAINING Strengths - The force or tension that a muscle or muscle group can exert against a resistance, usuall.� in one maximal effort. Endurance - The ability or capacity of a muscle or muscle group to perform repeated contractions against a load. The endurance capacity of a muscle is determined by its ability to maintain energy and oxygen supply. work - This is defined as the application of a force through a distance. Thus if you lift a 100 pound weight one foot in the air you have done 100 ft. lbs. of work. Power - This is defined as the amount of work done in a unit of time, such as foot pounds/min. Energy - This is defined as the capacity to perform work. You must use chemical energy in order to perform mechanical work. Energy can be measured in calories or oxygen units. Specificity - This concept dictates that an individual exercise relative to his or her goals: exercise the particular body part you wish to strengthen or increase in size. Overload - This principle emphasizes that in order to improve the level of strength or endurance, the stress applied to the body during training must be greater than that which the body can, at the time, handle. This usually entails working periodically at near maximal level. Frequency - This concept relates to the need of the body to rest and recover from hard training. Tn an effort to avoid 'he onset of "overtraining", heavv training days should be alternated Kith light training days, so that tissue growth, nutritional replenishment, and biochemical resynthesis can occur. 000224 9 EFFECTS OF TRAINING; OVERALL BENEFITS Hypertrophy - An increase in the size of the muscle. This increase is brought about by weight -resistive exercises. In order to achieve muscular hypertrophy the concept of progressive resistance must be followed. That is, as the muscles become stronger, they must work against a proportionately greater resistance to increase strength and size further. Although there is some controversy, it appears that isotonic contraction, with specifically few repetitions (1-5 lifts) and heavy weights (SO - 90% of maximal), are the most likely to result in hypertrophy. Atrophy - When a muscle is not used it will lose protein and become smaller. Regular resistive exercise must be attained if an individual wishes to maintain his/her current muscle size. The time sequence in which atrophy occurs is quite similar to the time sequence that it took to achieve hypertrophy. Overall Changes in Body Structure and Function - The human body can be divided into two major components, fat and fat -free weight (also called lean body weight, LBW). Most of the LBW (about 40%) is skeletal muscle. Thus, changes in this parameter, reflect an increase in skeletal muscle mass. LBW is denser than fat so it sinks in water but weighs more on land. It is important to be able to differentiate between overweight (too heavy for your height) and obesity (too much body fat). There are several laboratories where body composition analysis (measurement of fat and LBW) can be accurately measured and it is advisable to have this done prior to and after undertaking a training program. An advantage to having a higher LBW is that this "active tissue mass", is most active metabolically. Thus, an individual .aith a higher LBW than someone else of the same age, sex, and weight, will burn more calories and can eat more food and not have to worry about becoming overweight. Weight -training is an excellent mode of exercise to help increase the percentage of the LBW. Muscle Fatigue and Muscle Soreness - A muscle will contract just so many times before it stops exerting tension. It is believed by many that the inability to continue muscle contraction is due to depletion of high energy substrates (fuel) in the muscle. Those are called Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP) and Creatine Phosphate (CP). In addition there may be a build-up of lactic acid, a by- product of high intensity exercise. A short rest period will allow the muscle to regenerate ATP and CP and eliminate the lactic acid so that muscle contraction can continue. p0022w;) 7 Fati;ue due to an entire day of weight -training is probabl.• due to some changes that occur in the muscle tissue, perhaps related to muscle fibers damage. Although it is not considered to be dangerous, it is advisable to rest for several hours or better yet an entire dav, after a vigorous day of weight -training. Muscle soreness is believed to be caused by micro tears in muscle fibers or their tendinous attachments. Again, a rest period of 24 hours is usually sufficient for tissue regeneration. Flexibility - The ability of a joint to move throughout its entire range of motion: the ability of an individual to have total control of his/her limbs. Many people believe that a resistive - training program will cause "muscle-boundness" and inhibit flexibility. However, scientific studies show that a properly conducted resistive -training program will actually enhance joint flexibility. It should be noted, however, that exercise should always be performed correctly, and movements should be carried throughout a full range of motion for each repetition_ 000226 SAMPLE ONLY APPENDIX A 000227 s117 N � �Il a Jca �• : s d go fst$ll �3Pg� �4� l all'� ='s 31311 $j Ys_10 5-.000229 e€4IIIlIilL* 000230 CITY OF LA QUINTA MEETING DATE: January 18, 1993 ITEM TITLE: Receive and file the Annual Audit Report for the La Quinta Financing Authority AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC COMMENT: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS: WAN SUMMARY: The Financing Authority has concluded its annual financial report. Attached is the Independent Auditor's Report regarding the financial statements of the La Quinta Financing Authority for year ended June 30, 1993. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the La Quinta Financing Authority Financial Report for fiscal year 1992-93. Submitted By: THOMAS GENOVESE ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER Approved for submission to the Financing Authority �tuj C ROBERT L. HUNT CITY MANAGER 000231 /�T_Q/• a, o � s4 4Qgwaj COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE• Receive and file the Annual Audit Report for the City of La Quinta AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: The City of La Quinta has concluded its annual financial report. Attached is the Independent Auditor's Report regarding the financial statements of the City of La Quinta for the year ended June 30, 1993. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Receive and file the City of La Quinta Financial Report for fiscal year 1992-93. Submitted by: Thomas P. Genovese Assistant City Manager Signature Approved for submission to City Council: ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000232) 1 O/�11\\•• 1Il�► Q•� Tia, u�ft�6v � s � Fro � a� F its COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Approval of First Amendment Lease Agreement for the Senior Center (extension of current lease) with Maruko Inc. AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: 9 STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: Attached is the First amendment to the Lease Agreement with Maruko Inc. for the lease of the Senior Center facility. The purpose of the First Amendment to the Lease Agreement is to extend the current lease agreement to allow for the completion of the Senior Center construction project. The lease shall be extended to September 30, 1994. The First Amendment to the Lease Agreement also allows for three one month extensions thereby ensuring that the space for the current Senior Center location will remain available until the new Senior Center construction project is completed. There is no increase in monthly rent ($1227.80) or changes to the existing agreement. The existing lease agreement has been reviewed and approved by the City Attorney. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: Funds required for the rent of the Senior Center are allocated in Fiscal Year 1993/94 Budget. APPROVED BY: n RECOMMENDATION: Approve the First Amendment to the Lease Agreement with Maruko Inc. for the lease of the Senior Center. Submitted by: Thomas P. Genovese Assistant City Manager Signature Approved for submission to City Council: bllt Y�LL-�-17-' ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000233" FIRST AMENDMENT To LEASE This First Amendment to Lease ("Amendment Agreement") is entered into this 21st day of December, 1993, between Maruko, Inc. ("Landlord") and City of La Quinta ("Tenant"), with respect to the following: WHEREAS, Landlord and Tenant have entered into a lease dated July 31, 1992 (Hereinafter referred to as the "Lease") under the terms of which Tenant leased from Landlord approximately 1,300 square feet of space located at 78-461 Highway 111 in La Quinta, California 92253. The Lease expires on December 31, 1993 and the parties desire to extend the terms of the Lease, as hereinafter provided. THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants set forth below, the parties agree as follows: I. Extension of Terms: The term of the lease shall be extended for one-Jij-year nine months commencing January 1, 1994 and terminating Becember-3i-1994, September 30, 1994. 2. Minimum Monthly Rent: Commencing January 1, 1994, the minimum monthly rent shall not increase but remain at $1,227.80 plus the tenant's prorata share of the centers common area maintenance charges monthly. This rate shall continue through December 31, 1994. 3. Security Deposit. Landlord acknowledges prior receipt of a security deposit in the amount of $100.58. Tenant acknowledges that said deposit shall be held by Landlord throughout the extension period and pursuant to the terms of the lease. 4. ORtion to Extend. Landlord hereby grants to Tenant options to extend the Term of the Lease for three (3) one (1) month option periods ("Option Periods") commencing January-r,-1-99 September 30, 1994. As a condition precedent to the exercise by Tenant of the Option, Tenant shall give Notice to Landlord of its intention to exercise the Option for the first Option Period on or before November-17-1994 August 1, 1994. If notice of the exercise of the Option for the First Option Period is not so received by the Landlord on or before November-1;-1994 August 1, 1994, the option shall expire and be of no further force or effect. Thereafter the extension of the Term of the Lease for any additional Option Period shall likewise be accomplished by Tenant giving written notice to landlord at least 60 days prior to the commencement of any such Option Period or the option shall expire and be of no further force or effect. 5. Effectiveness of Lease. Except as otherwise modified by this Extension Agreement, all of the provisions of the Lease shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. LANDLORD: TENANT: Maruko Inc. City of La Quinta By: Minom Masuda Q� O4 O ' To4 OFTI'�'�� COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, Approving and Adopting a Memorandum of Understanding Between the City of La Quinta and the La Quinta City Employees' Association (LQCEA) Commencing on July 1, 1993 and Terminating June 30, 1994. AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: / O STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: Attached is the Resolution approving and adopting the Memorandum of Understanding between the City of La Quinta and the La Quinta Employees Association. All terms of the Memorandum of Understanding have been completed pursuant to the completed negotiations with the Employees' Association and approval of the City Council. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: All fiscal implications regarding the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding have been appropriated in the 1993/94 Fiscal Year Budget. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. 94- a Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, approving and adopting a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of La Quinta and the La Quinta City Employees' Association (LQCEA) commencing on July 1, 1993 and terminating on June 30, 1994. Submitted by: Thomas P. Genovese Assistant City Manager Signature Approved for submission to City Council: ?t, terr [ .tic;,.; ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000235 RESOLUTION NO. 94-_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND THE LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES' ASSOCIATION (LQCEA) COMMENCING ON JULY 19 1993 AND TERMINATING ON JUNE 30, 1994. WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta, hereinafter referred to as "City", and the La Quinta City Employees' Association, hereinafter referred to as "Association", have met and conferred over wages, hours, terms and conditions of employment pursuant to Government Code Section 3500 as amended; and WHEREAS, the City and the Association have signed a Memorandum of Understanding for the period commencing on July 1, 1993 and terminating on June 30, 1994; 000236 Resolution No. 94 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City does hereby approve, ratify, and authorize implementation of economic and non -economic benefit and right set forth in the Memorandum of Understanding between the City and Association, attached hereto and executed on January 18, 1994 and incorporated herein as "Exhibit A", and said to the extent the City may legally do so in accordance with the time constraints of said Memorandum of Understanding. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of January 18, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 00023'7 EXHIBIT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding ("Memorandum") is made and entered into by THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City") and the LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION ("Association") WHEREAS, the City, and the Association, have met and conferred in good faith with respect to the wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment of City employees and all other subjects within the scope of bargaining under the Meyer-Milies-Brown Act, Government Code section 3500 et. seq. and have reached an agreement that they wish to set forth in writing in the form of this Memorandum. The City and the Association therefore agree as follows; SECTION l: TERM This Memorandum shall take effect on July 1, 1993 and shall remain in effect until June 30, 1994. SECTION 2: SALARY The Schedule of Salary Ranges (Attachment # 1) shall be in effect during the term of this Memorandum. SECTION 3. ANNIVERSARY PINS City shall implement a program to provide an anniversary pin for employees having five (5) years of continuous service with the City. Continuous service shall be defined as no break in service exceeding thirty (30) consecutive days. SECTION 4: UNIFORM ALLOWANCE City shall provide five (5) clean sets of uniforms per week to employees within the Animal Control and Parks and Street Maintenance divisions. City retains the right to determine proper uniform attire for employees within all departments. SECTION 5: SUMMER DRESS Summer dress shall be limited to field personnel, from May 1st through October 1st. The summer dress policy is included as Attachment 2. 0� 02.33 SECTION 6: HEALTH CARE City agrees to pay as follows: Employee Employee & Dependent Health, Dental, Life $278.96 $590.08 vision 8.01 16.60 Any costs in excess of the aforementioned shall be paid by the employee. Costs of such insurance shall be paid by the employee by means of a payroll deduction as a condition of continued coverage. The benefits, terms, and conditions of coverage shall be governed by the formal plan documents. SECTION 7: EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM All employees, with prior approval of the City Manager, may be reimbursed for costs of books, tuition, and lab fees for classes or instruction, provided such classes or instruction are related to the employee's assigned duties with the City. The total of such reimbursements for all employees, shall not exceed $1,000 during the term of this Memorandum. Reimbursement will be made only after an employee has satisfactorily completed the class or workshop with the grade of C or better or equivalent completion and that evidence of same has been submitted and approved by the City Manager. SECTION 8: SICK LEAVE PAY OUT The date used to calculate sick leave pay out will be November 30. Any unused sick leave that is requested by the employee to be paid out will be done so at the rate reflected in the personnel policy leave pay schedule. SECTION 9: AUTO ALLOWANCE/REIMBURSEMENTS All mileage allowance and reimbursement shall be paid at the rate established, if any, during the annual budget process. SECTION 10: TOYS FOR TOTS PROGRAM City shall designate a location of City property to be a collection point for the Toys for Tots Drive. This location shall be made available for said purpose during the months of November and December. 00023.1 SECTION 11: MANAGEMENT RIGHTS Except as limited by the terms of this Memorandum of Understanding, the City retains the sole and exclusive right to manage its operations and direct its workforce using any or all of the power and authority previously exercised or possessed by the City or traditionally reserved to management, including but not limited to, the right to determine its organization and the kinds and levels of services to be provided; to direct the work cf its employees; to determine the hours of work including starting, quitting, meal, and break times; to determine the number and qualifications of personnel required; to assign work from one classification of employees to another, including work performed currently by employees in the classifications covered by this Memorandum; to establish work standard and levels of required performance; to schedule overtime; to utilize part-time or temporary employment; to pay wages and benefits in excess of those required by this Memorandum, to select, modify, alter, abandon, or modernize methods of conducting its operations; to build, move, modify, close, or modernize facilities, machinery, processes, and equipment; to establish budgetary procedures and allocations; to determine methods of raising revenues; to sublet and subcontract work; to take all necessary action in the event of emergency; to establish and amend rules of conduct and to impose discipline and discharge; to establish and amend rules for safety and health; to select, hire, classify, reclassify, assign, reassign, evaluate, transfer, promote, demote, upgrade, downgrade, reprimand, discipline, suspend, discharge, lay off, and retire employees; to determine job content and to create, abolish, combine, or modify job classifications and rates or classes of pay; and to exercise all other customary powers and authority of management, regardless of whether the City has exercised such power previously. Nothing in this provision shall be construed to restrict grievances concerning any part of this Memorandum. In the event of an emergency, the City may amend, modify, or rescind any provision of the Memorandum. Such amendment, modification, or rescission shall remain in force only for the period of the emergency. The City shall have sole and complete discretion to declare that an emergency exists for purposes for the Section. SECTION 12: MEET AND CONFER PROCESS The Association acknowledges that the City has fulfilled its obligation to meet and confer in good faith with respect to all subjects on which the Association wished to meet and confer. The Association, for itself, and each of the employees covered by this Memorandum hereby fully and voluntarily waives any right to demand that the City meet and confer with respect to any subject during the term of this Memorandum. 000240 SECTION 13: COMPLETE AGREEMENT This Memorandum contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior Memoranda of Understanding or other agreements, oral, written, or implied, with respect to any subject within the scope of representation. This Memorandum can be modified only in a subsequent written document, signed by both partners. CITY OF LA QUINTA Dated: ,1993 LA QUINTAZVTf EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION ��?( -Dated: 11993 By: Bruce Pelletier. President 000241. ATTACHMENTI CITY OF SCHEDULE LA QUINTA OF SALARY RANGES 93/94 file: SALRANGE 07/01/93 MONTHLY RANGE A 8 C D E 30 1601 1681 1766 1852 1946 31 1641 1723 1808 1899 1994 32 1682 1767 1853 1947 2044 33 1725 1810 1901 1995 2097 34 1769 1856 1949 2048 2150 35 1813 1903 1998 2099 2205 36 1859 1950 2049 2151 2258 37 1903 2001 2099 2205 2315 38 1950 2050 2151 2258 2372 39 2001 2101 2205 2316 2431 40 2050 2152 2260 2372 2492 41 2101 2206 2316 2432 2554 42 2152 2260 2373 2492 2617 43 2206 2317 2433 2554 2681 44 2261 2373 2492 2618 2747 45 2318 2434 2556 2683 2818 46 2375 2494 2620 2749 2888 47 2435 2557 2684 2920 2960 48 2495 2621 2751 2889 3033 49 2558 2685 2821 2962 3109 50 2622 2753 2890 3035 3188 51 2687 2822 2963 3110 3266 52 2754 2891 3036 3109 3346 53 2823 2965 3114 3268 3431 54 • 2894 3038 3190 3351 3518 3605 55 2966 3041 3116 3193 3271 3353 3434 3520 3695 56 57 3117 3273 3436 3607 3769 59 3195 3355 3523 3697 3884 59 3275 3438 3610 3791 3980 60 3357 3525 3701 3886 4060 61 3440 3612 3793 3962 4183 62 3527 3704 3888 4083 4286 63 3616 3795 3986 4185 4395 64 3706 3891 4086 4290 4504 65 3798 3989 4187 4397 4616 66 3893 4089 4292 4506 4732 67 3990 4189 4400 4619 4850 68 4090 4294 4508 4734 4971 69 4191 4402 4621 4852 5095 70 4297 4512 4736 4974 5223 71 4402 4622 4852 5095 5349 72 4512 4736 4974 5223 5485 73 4624 4855 5098 5352 5621 74' 4739 4976 5226 5467 5762 75 4858 5101 5356 5625 5907 6055 76 4980 5228 5490 5765 6206 77 5104 5232 5359 5492 5628 5769 5909 6057 6361 78 79 5364 5630 5913 6208 6520 80 5496 5771 6060 6364 6682 81 5634 5915 6212 6523 6849 82 5775 6063 6367 6686 7020 83 5919 6214 6526 6654 195 84- 6068 6369 6690 7025 7374 85 6220 6528 6857 7200 00024'7• ATTACHMENT 2 T4&f 4 a VQ" 78.105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564.2246 FAX (619) 564-5617 SUMMER DRESS POLICY Summer dress policy shall be limited to field personnel. Implementation of this policy is subject to the approval of the respective Department Director; final authorization rests with the City Manager. This policy is not applicable to office personnel that have the benefit of a climate controlled environment. Summer dress may be worn only during the Summer Work Hours as listed in the La Quinta Municipal Code section 6.08.050, May 1 through October 1 of each calendar year. The Summer Dress Policy shall not relieve any employee from putting forth anything less than a professional image. With this foremost objective in mind, the following guidelines shall be met: *All shirts must have a collar, be tucked into the pants, and in all other aspects conform with the employer dress guidelines. •Shorts shall be limited to earth tone colors, be mid -thigh length, hemmed, with a minimum of two pockets, a fly, and worn with a belt. *Approved shoes shall remain as is currently accepted by employer dress guidelines. *All appropriate safety equipment and clothing shall continue to be required. These requirements may be, but are not limited to: steel -toed shoes, orange shirts and/or reflective vests, long pants for certain maintenance functions. *This policy shall cause no expense to the City. Failure to adhere to this action. Bruce Pelletier La Quinta City Employees Association 4� 3o, F3 Date policy may result in disciplinary Robert L. Hunt, City Manager City of La Quinta e•,3p'93 Date 000243 MAILING ADDRESS - P.O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: A Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, Determining that the terms Approved by Resolution No. 94- Apply to all City Employees Commencing on July 1, 1993 and Terminating on June 30, 1994. AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: / I STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: Attached is the Resolution determining that the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding with the La Quinta Employees Association shall apply to all City Employees. This determination is required to establish the applicability of the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding to all non - association members. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: All fiscal implications regarding the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding and the approval of the Resolution have been appropriated in the 1993/94 Fiscal Year Budget. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Approve Resolution No. 94- a Resolution of the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, determining that the terms approved by Resolution No. 94- apply to all City employees commencing on July 1, 1993 and terminating on June 30, 1994. Submitted by: Thomas P. Genovese Assistant City Manager i Signature Approved for submission to City Council: ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000244 - RESOLUTION NO. 947_ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING THAT THE TERMS APPROVED BY RESOLUTION NO. 94- APPLY TO ALL CITY EMPLOYEES COMMENCING ON JULY 1, 1993 AND TERMINATING ON JUNE 3% 1994. WHEREAS, the City of La Quinta, hereinafter referred to as "City", and the La Quinta City Employees' Association, hereinafter to as "Association", have met and conferred over wages, hours, terms, and conditions of employment pursuant to Government Code Section 3500 as amended; and, WHEREAS, the City and the Association have signed a Memorandum of Understanding for the period commencing on July 1, 1993 and terminating on June 30, 1994 ("Exhibit A"); and, WHEREAS, the City has determined that the same wages, hours, terms and conditions of employment for the Association shall apply to all City of La Quinta employees; and, WHEREAS, the City provides additional life insurance benefits to executive personnel ("Management Unit") as outlined in "Exhibit B"; 00024 i Resolution No. 94 NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The City does hereby determine that the same wages, hours, terms and conditions of employment for the Association, as approved in Resolution No. 94-_, shall apply to all City of La Quinta employees. SECTION 2. The City provides additional life insurance benefits to executive personnel ("Management Unit"), as outlined in "Exhibit B". PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 18th day of January, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 000246 EXHIBIT A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding ("Memorandum") is made and entered into by THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ("City") and the LA QUINTA CITY EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION ("Association") WHEREAS, the City, and the Association, have met and conferred in good faith with respect to the wages, hours, and terms and conditions of employment of City employees and all other subjects within the scope of bargaining under the Meyer-Milies-Brown Act, Government Code section 3500 et. seq. and have reached an agreement that they wish to set forth in writing in the form of this Memorandum. The City and the Association therefore agree as follows; SECTION 1: TERM This Memorandum shall take effect on July 1, 1993 and shall remain in effect until June 30, 1994. SECTION 2: SALARY The Schedule of Salary Ranges (Attachment # 1) shall be in effect during the term of this Memorandum. SECTION 3. ANNIVERSARY PINS City shall implement a program to provide an anniversary pin for employees having five (5) years of continuous service with the City. Continuous service shall be defined as no break in service exceeding thirty (30) consecutive days. SECTION 4: UNIFORM ALLOWANCE City shall provide five (5) clean sets of uniforms per week to employees within the Animal Control and Parks and Street Maintenance divisions. City retains the right to determine proper uniform attire for employees within all departments. SECTION 5: SUMMER DRESS Summer dress shall be limited to field personnel, from May 1st through October 1st. The summer dress policy is included as Attachment 2. 000247 SECTION 6: HEALTH CARE City agrees to pay as follows: Employee Employee & Dependent Health, Dental, Life $278.96 $590.08 Vision 8.01 16.60 Any costs in excess of the aforementioned shall be paid by the employee. Costs of such insurance shall be paid by the employee by means of a payroll deduction as a condition of continued coverage. The benefits, terms, and conditions of coverage shall be governed by the formal plan documents. SECTION 7: EDUCATIONAL INCENTIVE PROGRAM All employees, with prior approval of the City Manager, may be reimbursed for costs of books, tuition, and lab fees for classes or instruction, provided such classes or instruction are related to the employee's assigned duties with the City. The total of such reimbursements for all employees, shall not exceed $1,000 during the term of this Memorandum. Reimbursement will be made only after an employee has satisfactorily completed the class or workshop with the grade of C or better or equivalent completion and that evidence of same has been submitted and approved by the City Manager, SECTION 8: SICK LEAVE PAY OUT The date used to calculate sick leave pay out will be November 30. Any unused sick leave that is requested by the employee to be paid out will be done so at the rate reflected in the personnel policy leave pay schedule. SECTION 9: AUTO ALLOWANCE/REIMBURSEMENTS All mileage allowance and reimbursement shall be paid at the rate established, if any, during the annual budget process. SECTION 10: TOYS FOR TOTS PROGRAM City shall designate a location of City property to be a collection point for the Toys for Tots Drive. This location shall be made available for said purpose during the months of November and December. SECTION 11: MANAGEMENT RIGHTS Except as limited by the terms of this Memorandum of Understanding, the City retains the sole and exclusive right to manage its operations and direct its workforce using any or all of the power and authority previously exercised or possessed by the City or traditionally reserved to management, including but not limited to, the right to determine its organization and the kinds and levels of services to be provided; to direct the work of its employees; to determine the hours of work including starting, quitting, meal, and break times; to determine the number and qualifications of personnel required; to assign work from one classification of employees to another, including work performed currently by employees in the classifications covered by this Memorandum; to establish work standard and levels of required performance; to schedule overtime; to utilize part-time or temporary employment; to pay wages and benefits in excess of those required by this Memorandum, to select, modify, alter, abandon, or modernize methods of conducting its operations; to build, move, modify, close, or modernize facilities, machinery, processes, and equipment; to establish budgetary procedures and allocations; to determine methods of raising revenues; to sublet and subcontract work; to take all necessary action in the event of emergency; to establish and amend rules of conduct and to impose discipline and discharge; to establish and amend rules for safety and health; to select, hire, classify, reclassify, assign, reassign, evaluate, transfer, promote, demote, upgrade, downgrade, reprimand, discipline, suspend, discharge, lay off, and retire employees; to determine job content and to create, abolish, combine, or modify job classifications and rates or classes of pay; and to exercise all other customary powers and authority of management, regardless of whether the City has exercised such power previously. Nothing in this provision shall be construed to restrict grievances concerning any part of this Memorandum. In the event of an emergency, the City may amend, modify, or rescind any provision of the Memorandum. Such amendment, modification, or rescission shall remain in force only for the period of the emergency. The City shall have sole and complete discretion to declare that an emergency exists for purposes for the Section. SECTION 12: MEET AND CONFER PROCESS The Association acknowledges that the City has fulfilled its obligation to meet and confer in good faith with respect to all subjects on which the Association wished to meet and confer. The Association, for itself, and each of the employees covered by this Memorandum hereby fully and voluntarily waives any right to demand that the City meet and confer with respect to any subject during the term of this Memorandum. 000249 SECTION 13: COMPLETE AGREEMENT This Memorandum contains the entire agreement between the parties and supersedes all prior Memoranda of Understanding or other agreements, oral, written, or implied, with respect to any subject within the scope of representation. This Memorandum can be modified only in a subsequent written document, signed by both partners. CITY OF LA QUINTA Dated: ,1993 By: John J. Pena, Mayor LA QUINTA EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION Dated:,1993 By: Bruce Pelletier, President 000250 ATTACHMENT CITY OF LA QUINTA SCHEDULE OF SALARY RANGES 93/94 tile: SALRANGE MONTHLY 07/01/93 RANGE A S C D E 30 1601 1661 1766 1852 1946 31 1641 1723 1808 1899 1994 32 1682 1767 1853 1947 2044 33 1725 1810 1901 1995 2097 34 1769 1856 1949 2048 2150 35 1813 1903 1998 2099 2205 36 1859 1950 2049 2151 2258 37 1903 2001 2099 2205 2315 38 1950 2050 2151 2258 2372 39 2001 2101 2205 2316 2431 40 2050 2152 2260 2372 2492 41 2101 2206 2316 2432 2554 42 2152 2260 2373 2492 2617 43 2206 2317 2433 2554 2681 44 2261 2373 2492 2618 2747 45 2318 2434 2556 2683 2818 46 2375 2494 2620 2749 2988 47 2435 2557 2684 2820 2960 48 2495 2621 2751 2889 3033 49 2558 2686 2821 2962 3109 50 2622 2753 2690 3035 3188 51 2667 2822 2963 3110 3266 52 2754 2891 3036 3109 3346 53 2823 2965 3114 3268 3431 54 • 2994 3038 3190 3351 3318 55 2966 3116 3271 3434 3605 56 3041 3193 3353 3520 3695 57 3117 3273 3436 3607 3789 58 3195 3355 3523 3697 3884 59 3275 3438 3610 3791 3980 60 3357 3525 3701 3886 4060 61 3440 3612 3793 3982 4183 62 3527 3704 3888 4083 4286 63 3616 3795 3986 4185 4395 64 3706 3891 4086 4290 4504 65 3798 3989 4187 4397 4616 66 3893 4089 4292 4506 4732 67 3990 4189 4400 4619 4850 68 4090 4294 4508 4734 4971 69 4191 4402 4621 4852 5095 70 4297 4512 4736 4974 5223 71 4402 4622 4852 5095 5349 72 4512 4736 4974 5223 5485 73 4624 4855 5098 5352 5621 74 4739 4976 5226 5487 5762 75 4858 5101 5356 5625 5907 76 4960 5228 5490 5765 6055 77 5104 5359 5628 5909 6206 78 5232 5492 5769 6057 6361 79 5364 5630 5913 6208 6520 80 5496 5771 6060 6364 6682 81 5634 5915 6212 6523 6849 82 5775 6063 6367 6686 7020 83 5919 6214 6526 6854 7195 84 6068 6369 6690 7025 7374 85 6220 6528 6857 7200 7559 00025t ATTACHMENT 2 Tw�l 4 awQ" 78-105 CALLE ESTADO — LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253 - (619) 564-2246 FAX (619) 564-5617 SUMMER DRESS POLICY Summer dress policy shall be limited to field personnel. Implementation of this policy is subject to the approval of the respective Department Director; final authorization rests with the City Manager. This policy is not applicable to office personnel that have the benefit of a climate controlled environment. Summer dress may be worn only during the Summer Work Hours as listed in the La Quinta Municipal Code section 6.08.050, May 1 through October 1 of each calendar year. The Summer Dress Policy shall not relieve any employee from putting forth anything less than a professional image. With this foremost objective in mind, the following guidelines shall be met: •All shirts must have a collar, be tucked into the pants, and in all other aspects conform with the employer dress guidelines. •Shorts shall be limited to earth tone colors, be mid -thigh length, hemmed, with a minimum of two pockets, a fly, and worn with a belt. *Approved shoes shall remain as is currently accepted by employer dress guidelines. •All appropriate safety equipment and clothing shall continue to be required. These requirements may be, but are not limited to: steel -toed shoes, orange shirts and/or reflective vests, long pants for certain maintenance functions. *This policy shall cause no expense to the City. Failure to adhere to this policy may result in disciplinary action. Bruce Pelletier La Quinta City Employees Association L 30- F3 Date Robert L. Hunt, City Manager City of La Quinta 6,-M.93 Date 00025:2' EXHIBIT B The City agrees to pay as follows: General Unit Health, Dental, Life vision Management Unit Health, Dental, Life vision Employee only 278.96 8.01 282.44 8.01 Employee & Dependents 590.08 16.60 600.59 16.60 Any costs in excess of the aforementioned shall be paid by the employee. Costs of such insurance shall be paid by the employee by means of a payroll deduction as a condition of continued coverage. The benefits, terms, and conditions of coverage shall be governed by the formal plan documents. 000,050 a Q• oTit,, 4 r o�� COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Request of Extension of Parc La Quinta Settlement AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: The City has received a request from Parc La Quinta's attorney for an additional extension of time to perform the undergrounding of utilities on Washington Street pursuant to the Settlement Agreement. In summary, the request states that due to the inability to underground the power poles without a properly recorded Imperial Irrigation District easement and the inability to finance the project until additional homes are sold, they are unable to perform at this time. In addition, the City has not included the City's share (50%) of the cost of undergrounding in the Fiscal Year 1993/94 budget. Staff would have to reallocate funds for the estimated 50% which, per the original engineer's estimate, is approximately $100,000. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended Attorneys office to send a fourth performance time until July 23, 1994. Submitted by: Robert L. Hunt, City Manager Signature APPROVED BY: the City Council authorize the City letter extending Parc La Quintals Approved for City Council: ssion to ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000254 1-1-9 0?,66PM PP:OM SY gk TO 9%1619i7777101 P002/00" STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH A PROPEBUONAL ConruRATION FRITZ R, STRADLING ROBERT A. WINON NICK E. VOCCA CHERYLA. DOW ATTORNEYS AT 14W C. CIA14 CAALBON NICNOLAI J. TOCCA WILLIAM R. RAUTA III JULIE M. PDRYER 666 NEWPORT CENTER DRIV_, , '400 R. C. RRNAAP RICHAAD C. GOODMAN uARK T. rRIIN MICMAEL 1, PLYNN PCBT OFFICE BOX T680 JOHN J. HURRAY J. M ARFESERTON A. NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660-6441 TNON F.CLARK, JR. CAROL L IIN A. FRYDMAN DENISE HARSAUON MERINO TELEPHONE (71 4) 723-4000 DAVID R, M\FW {N BARBARA MD LEIIOLD PAULL 4AL1 JON EGOETZ FACSIMILE (71A) 725-4100 RUDOLPN IO SHEPARD ANN 9, IRELAND ROBERT J. 4ANE MICMAEL J. 099014CAUT SRVCE C. STUART DAVID N. MANN E. [URT YFA4EA OMRISTOPMIR M, MOROP0UWS n0\[PT J, WNALRN [UKAKTM A. NCWIIY RO6EAT CRICA OARRVL 6 GIISON R ANDALL J, Sk0MAN JOHN a MPCLENDGN IAUCI W. PIUCNTER J11 MI PARR MARK JNVI66CM TODD P. TNAKAR 1010Y A. ELLIS SRVCE 0. MAY RICHARD T. NEEDHAM ROBERT C. WALLACE January I2, 1994 DONALD J. MAMMAN JOHN F. CANNON JOHN J. IWIOART JR. JAY RAPPA►ORT MICMAEL A. ZA6LOCKi JOHN B. WOO DMEAD IV NE4A A. 9EANSTEIN OOVCLAS I. FEICK CEL16T[ RYAML RRACY W."IAM J. MORL[Y CNPISTOPNEP J KILPATRICK MARK L. SKAIST JOEL N. OUTH SANDRA WAKAMIYA SCMAAL JUL11 MRCOY AKINS JOHN O. VAUONAN DAWN C. HONEYWELL STEVEN M. MAKE LAWRENCE I. "HAI MICMAEL M MULROY MARLEY L. SJILLANO MARV ANNE WAGNER STEPHEN T. FREEMAN SCOTf R. MAKES City Council Members City of La Quinta 78-195 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 Re, Extension of Parc La Quints Settlement Dear Council Members: JOHN E. IR{CKENRIOGI AENA C. STONE D, eoV v,, WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL (714) 725-4142 We have received a request from Parc La Quinta's attorney (see attached letters from Doug Phillips) for an additional extension to their performance under the settlement agreement concerning the undergrounding of utilities on Washington Street, In summary, the request states that due to the inability to underground the power poles without a property recorded Imperial Irrigation District easement and the inability of Barton to finance until additional homes are sold, they are unable to perform at this time. In addition, the City has not included the City's share of 50%O of the cost of undergrounding in the proposed budget for 93-94. We would have to reallocate funds for our estimated 50% which is the original engineer's estimate placed at approximately $100,000. Therefore, we would recommend that the Council authorize the City attorney's office to send a fourth letter extending yet again the performance time under the Parc La Quinta Settlement Agreement, 000255 O2 HP�� FK11' SPC&P, mO 9i1o19,/i???_O1 POO?'OO? .c City Council Members January 12, 1994 Page 2 of 2 01 Should you have any questions, I would be happy to address them. Very truly yours, STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH Dawn C. Honeywell DCH:cm 000256 FRi,"'1 SYUR TC 9%1519/717' 101 100I,', ' "A Mb4Wdit SOMCA.TICN &EST, BEST & KRIEGER A /YRIWA•IM. NJim" nOnewMr CONFURPO f LAWYERi CYNTNIA M. GLV"AAN6 ' IMTE 312 MART E. OM.6TW 6LENN F. U&NE "YOO We ND DRIVE CNRRTINE L. RUP-ARD6ON ►Wt QMCE box 1se$ JOANEJ,KOEHC016ON RAN0Wdk 1KW M CAUPIORFMA 92270 a.IWENIER 6 70.EPFIOHE (639) 066-i611 REBE C MAR aaCCA MARouNNcr TEU:CONER (9191 540-66W �R�AAA�MYMEONO MST (1464.19071 CUOEK BEST 101eOa E4et1W6) December 8, 1993 Dawn Honeywell, Esq. STR"LING, XOCCA, CARLSON & RAVTH 660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1600 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Re: Pare La Quinta v. City of La Quinta Dear Dawn: Of COUMEL JAWS 6. CO111{004 OFEN:6f W Rlv"MDE MOW So&) 400 PALM AP61NN. 1616f376-]964 ONTAR)O fOOM ffO-60W Pursuant to our last telephone conversation, I have asked my client to summarize their current financial status of the Parc La Quinta Joint Venture and to provide information as to why a new six month extension of the time on the settlement with the City makes sense at this point. The Parc La Quinta Joint Venture currently has about $40,000 in the bank. The FDIC is not funding any carryings costs. Monthly expenses and marketing expenses run approximately $20,000. Parc La Quinta has a unit in escrow but if this unit closes, the ,joint Venture will still only have funds for 2 months carry if the Venture immediately pays the estimated $125,000 representing the Vanture's share to underground the power poles. The Venture needs at least one more unit (in addition to the unit now in escrow) to be sold and close escrow (the Venture has no other pending escrows currently) to have, depending on time and carrying expenditures, sufficient funds on hand to both underground the poles and retain sufficient funds to carry the project for a number of months while the venture awaits further and future sales. DWIM19 000257 i:_-9 "56pr.,1 ?kON SYC?E TO 9/1619%177'161 r0051"06.° Lww ar►itca or BEST, BEST i KRIEGER Dawn Honeywell, Esq. December 8, 1993 Page a The bottom line is that the venture needs a new six month extension. Dawn, I hope this information will be of assistance to you in convincing the city Council that, although there have been some sales, one additional sale in addition to the unit currently in escrow is needed before the Venture can responsibly fund its share to underground. in other words, we appear to be moving in the right direction but one more six month extension appears both reasonable and necessary under the circumstances. rihally, Dawn, have you any news with respect to the IID easement question? very truly yours, - i 444�� wx--� DOUGLAS S. PHILLIPS of Beat, Best & Krieger DSP:pan cc: Irwin Golds, general partner usc6ts 000258 r?- -94 01 :55FN FROM S"'&F, TO 9%1619!�?+?101 PO 6!00' BEST, BEST &, KRIEGER LAWYERS A ft'ft IK m1.0U IM1'MUNO KAT 416661957) JAMES H. EUGENE I ERTECER (i9aa19M1i97ai November 24, 1993 Dawn Honeywell, Esq. STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH 660 Newport Center Drive, Suite 1600 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Re: Para La Quint& v. City of La Quinta Dear Dawn: SUITE 312 39700 909 MOPE DRIVE POST OFFICE Box 1606 RANCHO MIRAGE, CAUFORNIA 92270 TELEPHONE (4193 St&2611 T=0QK IC,( (619) 646.6696 07 UOU""6 J"E69. C0RNON errKEII IN 11"EROIOE 49") M&1450 FwM SPRMl99 (6t9)923-7264 A TAI(10 4R 1 Y A0. A I understand that the current time extension on the Parc La Quinta settlement expires January 24, 1994. I note that at this point we are unable to underground the power poles without a properly recorded Imperial Irrigation District easement. I enclose letters dated July 29, 1993 and November 9, 1993 from Barcon to IID requesting recordation of the utility easement. The City has copies of the letters and is aware of the situation. To our knowledge, that easement has yet to be recorded. Second, the continuing cash problem of the joint venture makes it difficult, if not impossible, to underground the power poles at this time. We are still, in other words, locked in the jaws of a federal bureaucracy. Barcon's situation has improved but it would be preferable not to start the work at this time. 000259 Osp"da FROM SYC'R T 9ilbl9!7777'01 POJ�'�i? LAW OFFICKS OF BEST] 0E5T & KRILGER Dawn HoneyW'sll, Esq. November 24, 1993 Page 2 Y Would you let me know whether or not the City is willing and Able to proceed at this time or not? Perhaps one additional, and hopefully last, extension of 6 months would be appropriate. please give me a call when you get this letter. very truly yours, DOUG s. pxILI,IPs of Best, Best a Krieger DSP:pam cc: Irwin Golds, general partner 000260 FRITZ R. STRADLING NICK E. YOCCA C. CRAIG CARLSON WILLIAM R. RAUTH III K.C.SCHAAF RICHARD C. GOODMAN JOHN J. MURPHY THOMAS P. CLARK. JR. BEN A. FRYDMAN DAVID A. MOEWEN PAUL L. GALE RUDOLPH C. SHEPARD ROBERT J. KANE SAUCE C. STUART E. KURT YEAGER ROBERT J. WHALEN ROBERT E. RICH RANDALL J. SHERMAN SAUCE W. FEUCHTEA MARK J. NUEBBCH KAREN A. ELLIS SAUCE 0. MAY DONALD J. HAMMAN JOHN J. SWIGART. JR. MICNAEL A. ZASLOCEI NEILA R. BERNSTEIN CELESTE STAHL BRADY CHRIBTOPHER J. KILPATRICK JOEL H. GUTH JULIE NODDY AKINS DAWN C. HONEYWELL LAWRENCE S. COHN HARLEY L. BJELLAND STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION STEPHEN T. FREEMAN ATTORNEYS AT LAW AOSEAT A. WILSON YOCCA H IIOL A. D YOCCA NICHOLAB J. N 660 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE. SUITE 1600 JULIE M. POSTER POST OFFICE BOX 7880 MARE T. PALIN MICNAEL E. FLYNN NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA 92880.6441 ROBERT C. FUNSTEN ALETA LOUISE BRYANT TELEPHONE 17141 726-4000 GARY A. PEMBERTON CAROL L. LEW TELEPHONE 17141640-7035 OENIBE HARSAUGH HERING BARBARA ZEID LEISOLD FAX NUMBER JON E. GOETZ JOHN D. IRELAND 17141 72S-4100 MICNAEL J. PENDERGAST DAVID H. MANN CHRISTOPHER M. MOROPOULOS ELIZABETH A. NEWELL DARRYL S. GIBSON JOHN G. MGCLENOON JEE HI PARS July 14, 1993 TODD A. THAKAR RICHARD T. NEEDHAM ROBERT C. WALLACE GERARD L. oSKAM JOHN F. CANNON KENT M. CLAYTON JOHN E. WOOOMEAD IV DOUGLAS P. FEICK WILLIAM J. MORLEY MARK L. SKAIST NANCY J. DEWHIRST SANDRA M. WAKAMIYA Mr. Douglas S. Phillips BEST, BEST & KRIEGER 39700 Bob Hope Drive P.O. Box 1555 Rancho Mirage, California 92270 Re: Approval of 3rd Request For Extension Dear Mr. Phillips: JOHN E. BRECKENRIDGE RENA C. STONE O. OOVMRF1 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL: (714) 725-4142 This letter is in response to your request on behalf of your client Parc La Quinta for an additional extension of performance under the Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release dated July 23, 1991 (the "Agreement"). Based on the continued difficulties originally listed in the attached letter, the City Council has authorized your client a third extension of time to perform their obligations under the Agreement from July 23, 1993 to January 23, 1994. Please keep the City informed of all progress made towards completing Parc La Quinta's responsibilities under the Agreement. Very truly yours, STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH Dawn C. Honeywell DCH:cm Enclosure cc: Robert Hunt, City Manager David Mann, Esq. 000261 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Review of Applicants for the Volunteer Advisory Board AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: Attached are the eight applications receivea =or Lne vululiut=� Advisory Board. Each of the applicants was invited to the meeting. Additionally, Norris Bernard has expressed an interest in serving as Volunteer Coordinator and has been serving, unofficially, in that capacity. it would be appropriate at this time to make the official appointment. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Appoint the three member Volunteer Advisory Board and appoint Norris Bernard as the Volunteer Coordinator. Submitted by: Pamela LiCalsi Personnel & Budget Manager Signature Approved for submission to City Council: ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 00026? a �• 04 ' � • AAA �W � O � S yOF Ltd TO: The Honorable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: Pamela LiCalsi, Personnel & Budget Manager DATE: January 18, 1994 SUBJECT: Volunteer Advisory Board ISSUE: The following eight applications were received for the Volunteer Advisory Board: Diane Adolph Jill Alperstein Sidney Arden Louis Glick Dan Newman Paul Puma George Varton Judy Vossler BACKGROUND: On October 19,1993 Council adopted an Ordinance that created the Volunteer Advisory Board. The board will meet, at a maximum, once per month for the first year and quarterly thereafter. The functions of the Board, as established at that time, include; 1. Provide direction and guidance to the La Quinta Volunteer Effort program. 2. Advise, support, and recommend policies for the Volunteer Effort program. 3. Plan and recommend recognition events for volunteers. Each applicant was sent a letter advising them that the applications are being reviewed at today's meeting. Applicants were also notified that in the past, Council has conducted short interviews with applicants for board positions. When Council initially discussed the La Quinta volunteer Effort program, Norris Bernard was instrumental in the establishment of the concept and spent a great deal of time assisting staff in the creation of the handbook and manual. The Volunteer Coordinator is not a member of the Advisory Board. However, it would be appropriate for Council to officially appoint Norris Bernard to the position. 000263 - ANALYSISTISCAL IMPACTS: There is no salary for the Volunteer Coordinator. Board Members do not receive any compensation for their participation. Board Members serve for three year staggered terms beginning on January 1st of each year. initially, one member will be appointed to a one (1) year term; one member will be appointed to a two (2) year term; and a third member will be appointed to a three (3) year term. These appointments will start their yearly calculations from January 1, 1994. RECOMMENDATION: Appoint the three member Volunteer Advisory Board and appoint Norris Bernard as the Volunteer Coordinator. 000264 Date /Z� — /,Z -'? 3 RECL7I'JE�D -3 DEC 13 PR 3 `& TY OF LA QUINTA I T'; G "r L" Q U I N TAppLICATION TO SERVE CITY CLERK ON VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD NAME: HOME ADDRESS: (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) -d5" (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: Alzdzd2ti The following information will be used by the La Quinta City Council as a screening process to determine which applicants will be interviewed for appointment to the La Quinta Volunteer Advisory Board. Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. .. _ 1_. /_" .>, cl.. t. 4,L ffea../..() /L,�. 5—i rig 'LGr� A-- tl f4.- -t �-/ /1,1 , dn/.A-.T, F t%PPtliu e Q%A& L.�. 1 , i s APPLICATION, VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 What specific attitudes, skills, and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the Volunteer Advisory Board? M Your name will be considered by the City Council upon receipt of your application. It is expected that the Council will appoint members to fill existing vacancies in January. PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION NO LATER THAN December 22, 1993 TO: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO P. O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 000266 Date December 9. 1993 CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD NAME: Jill A. Alperstein HOME ADDRESS: 53-1 24 Avenida Carranza (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: 69-730 Hwy 1 1 1 , Rancho Mirage 92270 TELEPHONE: (HOME) 5 6 4- 3 4 6 3 (BUSINESS) 3 2 8- 2 4 9 9 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: Gary Jon, Inc. / Interior Designer LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 11 Years The following information will be used by the La Quinta City Council as a screening process to determine which applicants will be interviewed for appointment to the La Quinta Volunteer Advisory Board. Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. Born/raised in Los Angeles, I studied Interior Design at San Jose State University. My husband and I came to the desert area five years ago, and lived in Palm Desert prior to moving to La Quinta. I am intensly concerned and interested in helping preserve La Quinta's heritage and unique character. My design experience has given me an appreciation for our traditional small-town community, and feel it is imperative to maintain this for the good of the future stability. In addition to the cosmetic aspects of this area, I am also greatly concerned for the people of the community, and the welfare of children, and trying to make this a better and safer place which we can all enjoy. APPLICATION, VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 What specific attitudes, skills, and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the Volunteer Advisory Board? I have never felt quite so compelled to take an active part in my community until now. Perhaps it is because I feel that this is a truly rare jewel here in the desert, and want to help it -become the place we all want for it. I have some very strong feelings for the crime we seem to be riddled with, even though it definitely has improved in last few years. To solve much of this I feel it nee s to is the community whichlcome together to fight this, and make it clear to those who feel the need to disrupt our peace, that it will not be tolerated. I do not feel that currently in the community, & would incourage more participation by residents. This, in turn, would be felt by children, to see their parents active in this fight, and would also help to discourage crime and destruction. My experience maybe limited in actual civil involvement, but I am extremely capable and enthusiastic to bring people together, and directed, for common goals. As an interior designer, I have become a project manager, which serves the same function to create, organize, direct, and put into action ideas and real -solutions. Your name will be considered by the City Council upon receipt of your application. It is expected that the Council will appoint members to fill existing vacancies in January. PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION NO LATER THAN December 22, 1993 TO: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO P. O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 000268 NAME: CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION TO SERVE ON VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD c T nNF.Y H . ARDEN HOME ADDRESS: 53 390 Avenida Valle Jo La Quinta. CA 92253 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: Same TELEPHONE: (HOME) (619) 771-1456 (BUSINESS) same IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: 53-390 Avenida Vallejo and various offices in the Los Angeles area, and hear cases as arbitrator in the Indio Courthouse LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 3 months The following information will be used by the La Quinta City Council as a screening process to determine which applicants will be interviewed for appointment to the La Quinta Volunteer Advisory Board. Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. See enclosed resume 01 APPLICATION, VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 What specific attitudes, skills, and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the Volunteer Advisory Board? 38 years as an active, practising attorney and arhi trntnr • **+"p.. ....a A4 ___ of various civic organizations for several decades (see enclosed resume) Your name will be considered by the City Council upon receipt of your application. It is expected that the Council will appoint members to fill existing vacancies in January. PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION NO LATER THAN December 22, 1993 TO: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO P. O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 000270 P 01 RESUME OF SIDNEY H. ARDEN Prior to 1956 1. was licensed by the California Insurance Commission as a Fife and General Insurance Agent and by the California Department. of Real Estate as a Broker. I was admitted to the California State Bar in 1956 and have practised law ever since. 1950-1955- Four time (,()-Chairman of the March of Dimes in Beverly Hills, California, Lawrence P. MuHugh, Chairman. 1963-1470 (approx.) Member of National Board of Arbitrators of American Arbitration Assoxiation. In the early 1960's - One of one hundred plaintiffs' attorneys appointed to a panel to hear Superior Court arbitralion cases. 1968-1973 - Vice President of Optimist Home for Boys and four time President of Beverly Wilshire Optimist Club of Beverly Hills. 1986-87 - President of the Beverly Hills Business and Professional Mens' Association. 1 all, presently oil a panel of Court Arbitrators hearing cases assigned by Los Angeles and Riverside Counties. I also have served on panels hearing medical malpractice cases involving Kaiser Hospitals and Permanente Medical Groups. 1956-93 - Private general practice of law with emphasis on negligence, wills and probate and medical malpractice cases. References: The Honorable Richard C. Fildew, Judge Retired, Los Angeles Superior Court; The Honorable Warren Deering, Judge Retired, Los Angeles Superior Court. Date of birth: May 31, 1922. Social Security No. 372-18-8166. Age 71, Sidney H. Amen 53-390 Avenida Vallejo La Quinta, CA 92253 (619) 771-1456 0002'71 Date 1t f a';h3 CITY OF LA QUI NTA APPLICATION TO 9WE 2 0 P M 1 1 Q ON VOLUNTEER ADVISORY �OAIf LA a U I N TA CITY MA:vaGER'S OFFICE NAME: Gdvls G. 6-LICK HOME ADDRESS: 14�/.27o II(LLErA DR.- 7)).53 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) 40?7 (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: 71 REP LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: a YR5 - L/aw rid S The following information will be used by the La Quinta City Council as a screening process to determine which applicants will be interviewed for appointment to the La Quinta Volunteer Advisory Board. Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. yc> n6jv_- B f S P&6-AEC 1V EOLk47loAl. CIS DEwEE /N fEywl-i #;. - TEAcrllAl6r PE'CFRCE - A 4r(i- $C(CAICE' - '7% f-LIX 6-RApES. ALSO M�S DE�REr RLLDasS ME T nwft REr, imr, /,tr Jnytu 46&4� Scf�eaL. . L)og& E'xPW tdocE --1, 3 '(AS rE'Ac 9[414.- 7't /4 QAOEs Marbt r- 5CIC-Nce Z, 33 W. LAr RE-tr (L (g6- - LAST /S y AS' 6A6L o m$SE'. /N trR, -6F l`f 6 L DEPRRrANE",s IA� 6:AcA Vbef 4yrH 7Tis7AL a Sr PEPS; &"S 7 Q[Aftr- Tb-ML RESP&APSIALC foR & twc-.ApVFArisz 5�'tc-sl 3. �Irrl s. c.o,R.F �(sAcrl}L Cenlsx:dNrs c�' RFrrA�eo �'xc-currdEsJ faR P&P(r)- YE" S'. y, dad l r1 rg /64p s 4 w uc, - R60AESFArr M 4*atom Uts-nis Ar rr rr 04AAW11/6- 14 c t-1Y C'60 -t[. MEEl/�r _ 00027 APPLICATION, VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 What specific attitudes, skills, and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the Volunteer Advisory Board? I. MY Qaf&sf APkk d:.46dN0 LlAS T J"-r Aic To kEC04�0tzt A P, 68LLC n . Fiue OLM DEI—A((5 of toog (S m,#6y4L, TigeAt M6ct-Eq r SaL,✓E (T. - a• Am co0S(OEAE•0 T Rf: A SPFuAG/sT / r ArAtic ?n A,4A1466mOr RF09riWS14 fP, Your name will be considered by the City Council upon receipt of your application. It is expected that the Council will appoint members to fill existing vacancies in January. PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION NO LATER THAN December 22, 1993 TO: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO P. O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. Date December 21, 1993 CITY OF LA QUTA JED IN APPLICATIONj�(WEJ4 M 3 17 ON INTA VOLUNTEER ADV46iVj- K NAME: Dan Newman HOME ADDRESS: 77877 Calle Arroba (Mail P.O. Box 1441) (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME) 5 6 4- 4 7 2 8 (BUSINESS) IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: Retired LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: Two years The following information will be used by the La Quinta City Council as a screening process to determine which applicants will be interviewed for appointment to the La Quinta Volunteer Advisory Board. Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. EXPERIENCE: Municipal Fire Department, 10 years; Municipal Public Works Department Water Division, 1 1/2 years: Municipal Building and Safety Departments (2)9 4_yPars- County Department of Building and Safety, 19 years (Chief of Structural Inspection Section 5 years) EDUCATION: Los Angeles Harbor College, A.A Degree Cal -State University Fullerton, 1967 VOLUNTEER BACKGROUND: Yacht club officer, 5 years (Commodore 1987) Newport Ocean Sailing Association l years (Newpnrt/F.nspunda gar-, Race Chairman, 1990) (Continued reverse side) 000274 APPLICATION, VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 What specific attitudes, skills, and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the Volunteer Advisory Board? Retiring after 34 years of service with municipal and county agencies has given me firat hand knn ladgo of thpir miaainns and needs I have participated in emnlnWaa gelection pa�n+llsboth within my own department, and as a guest interviewer, I am familiar with the functioning of action -oriented committees. having served with them at all levels, including leadership This experience has allowed me to develop my ability to visualize a project both as a "whole" and its component parts. In conclusion, I believe La Quinta is THE the place o 1iv , work and retire. I would eniov the opportunity to serve on the Volunteer Advisory Board. Your name will be considered by the City Council upon receipt of your application. It is expected that the Council will appoint members to fill existing vacancies in January. PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION NO LATER THAN December 22, 1993 TO: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 78495 CALLE TAMPICO P. O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 000273 r Date G LSC 3 RECE1`/ED CITY OF LA QUINTAOEEC 22 Pal 3 22 APPLICATION TO SERVE ON Jr LA QUiNTA VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOAS C L E R K �cA Pcj NAME: U L_ !) . M ft- HOME ADDRESS: 49 —0 S (:-LLB I A-Qu1 r,r-,7!�— (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: (HOME)(L O) ��l (BUSINESS) IF4MPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: U" A 1-- S S O C L ✓�-t�S i 1- I N 00�-' /C l Ph-L, Co� S U� r �)p l nlCt P(�L —• / LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: The following information will be used by the La Quinta City Council as a screening process to determine which applicants will be interviewed for appointment to the La Quinta Volunteer Advisory Board. Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. 6oaz17) - / 3 ri!�Z 2j- 6-(r-f-77ML� 4--rSi w; S�-o,C--L1,- /3 u s Z, L . 1/3 ED��) no S G 17 6 &13 �J 8f Too L� , �( I V- . Cci ✓Lrc, — 3 �2r7 i r .c tti /u cr ,� ; z—>c w ��rx�.� L L- /�— d N-�-- t JM�g2 I�SSO( Lr"'ll-i-SI �/(ILuJC�� I-n✓�*�L(hl� �- / (/ i• (C &-T/ f\J N S U (L �Ct L 1 -y syi- D Co t? Ivi &-�c,czi--- „ „ „ ., •� s II _ APPLICATION, VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 What specific attitudes, skills, and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the Volunteer Advisory Board? 1f • Cca'r� 1 �/4Lo M u ti, cs� �nL 2 T +k'l 121C_D N C ( C-'0 (-) j C L— Cc � v E u ar„ PI--70c, c A- L -+- L.� t (H- " I �w-a-S �� �u cc�.�sS��/ L e �7�-j l N ✓a c 1/� C.-�%, r�4,, &4 64,Ll I'—e J l 0 �AA (=` C)A _Ly Your name will be considered by the City Council upon receipt of your application. It is expected that the Council will appoint members to fill existing vacancies in January. PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION NO LATER THAN December 22, 1993 TO: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO P. O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 000277 REC ''QED Date /, ,20 9,3 i DEC 21 PM 0�ITY OF LA QUINTA f () r L :', Q U I N TAPPLICATION TO SERVE CiT'� CLERK ON VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD NAME: �t�Q,Q�E V , HOME ADDRESS: Ll y SOS 1"/o (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: &IyII ///; OZ. A C' . 9z ZS"3 T TELEPHONE: (HOME) & / y1 ,_3(0O yCl (BUSINESS) �� ��� yh . 7Z IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: ►nt eq— �R.23EC1 �2E�CT67ef - SECS rI 3 ' Z 6 5 9" `f // / , 2 AWM DESowr CM . 9ZZ60 LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: The following information will be used by the La Quinta City Council as a screening process to determine which applicants will be interviewed for appointment to the La Quinta Volunteer Advisory Board. Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. + 60PW 4 12A I SnJ S4-0 EL"a,Jbo VtgttCi' /VIA2RlFA ,a 'Co CNI�DNoop Src�c� He n. i 3'Z YCS , A60 (Z) GrowkJ DAU6,�IT��1 �1 S 01J - I ►J - LA LL/ (I) ,j 6 S o J . 2 S YeA m i K1 SEA'✓SCE W ITN L,h .CITY 4_�I62E DePT, bep , 0e?) CA PTa 10 , , , Re-OCATED o LA 9010 TA PEO 0 Sty-) l - RE T12e-b / ti Q" C E-STATE Q EVTCY f`/n/1SHE7' (ztiS-rkuCT/0ti of VKICAT1oJ 40nC 1J L4k-TAHLP,, 4 STU 61 r=_t_S 60S 1oJ eflft 4::-E—.J VnA L U , io u 1T LA, V4i4t fr-1 &Ct_EFE NAVE oyW� q 5''c�S, At`�QEyliTt tl ,4T�atiJ I� 1Ce PoL(CE SCiCJC0, -t- u`gyt- W04kch CL)SE, WITH nJLWo20US CIT: CCyAJT�' (:QVG"m00T_1qL A6E�JC1C_� /M PAST I Per=-56-1'jt aAtC.6---oeSS1 -I- L°O,)ST2t)CTC-6 jq M UM 6 C (GCS / b &-� O of S TA i T TO F_k11Sf1, APPLICATION, VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 What specific attitudes, skills, and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the Volunteer Advisory Board? APT/TO DE LFAWSNIP LM AIJ6tLES _(JITY jCi2C DFP QTin&Vr PTAI0— STi47-/W C'.CmmAUA&)Q,, /Y#gAM(;66 0Vt12ALL 0A607-10 o r TA s k Fo2coE SiATt oAi . p-QsoNAla , EQCOM67vr )C-19C''/L/771--1-' SA lz'eTY , 6�UCAT700 , T2-4/A/i,v4-, �1/AtOATio/,J 2OU,—i�1E eY G-M 029eJ c Y 0 PE6Z4 Ttc j I m PLE7nC-)U 7-AT/o /l o F- 22L/C(&r UQES, k'6-00Mm&�.J5ATrOnJS, /r►Rti1r9G�� �ommv,U�r� pze4 eoM f QE SA f te-TY� &n uC6&-X'+C Y P2c�Aoe6DAIM C,gRTN V 611f4 Fio'C-` Pe6y1)U71—C'V +62USN (°LEY�QRn/C`E, �(pLOQC�? SCOUTS �/AZ.4QhOUS /YlpTi.�L! , /, -�- POSSESS TffC- 0ESr2E. UJILLIOUG ICSS To PgSS 01.1 AO(Pot2E8 LOPE IE�C�, SlcicL Ef To oU4 -CnmmUAJIi}l flEVE"LOPmex) j Your name will be considered by the City Council upon receipt of your application. It is expected that the Council will appoint members to fill existing vacancies in January. + �USIuECSMgnl - pcUN��/oPe�QArE� //i�A.41AS�� Sn)ALC B(JS/N'6�'f JeePC 6-S747-E ' giUIG�/A/G; �LC2/ST; PNG%0�u,gP/y PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION NO LATER THAN December 22, 1993 TO: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 78-495 CALLE TAMPICO P. O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 000279 RESUME OF: George R. Varton 44-505 Via Del Monte La QUinta, California 92253 Telephone : 619 / 360-2040 OBJECTIVE: Affiliate with a professional organization, utilize acquired Life safety skills / expertise, apply to the management of plant, technology and safety, with the goal of enhanced safety / security to all. EXPERIENCE: Station Commander / Management - personnel, programs, reports, records, staffing, equipment / Captain facilities; general safety, education, training and emergency preparedness; implementation of policies and procedures, review, monitor and evaluate, make recommendations regarding fire/life safety. Supervise community safety programs, emergency preparedness plan, fire prevention, brush clearance, safety inspections. Inspector Managed / Life Safety / Inspection programs - complex occupancies, plants, industrial / commercial and hospitals. Code enforcement, risk assessment, surveys, emergency plans, surveillance / enforcement of safe practices re: hazardous material and special hazards. Investigator Fire / Arson, managed complex -major department / city investigations. Engineer Managed Equipment and Utility Systems Firefighter Fire Suppression, Prevention / Inspection Deputy Sheriff Court Bailiff, Crime Prevention / Investigation and Technical Services. Real Estate Managed Residential Construction EDUCATION: MISCELLANEOUS: Los Angeles City Fire Department Certified 3,000 Hrs.1966-1987 Los Angeles Co. Sheriffs Department if 57000 1963-1966 California Conference. of Arson Investigators" 40 1977 Instructor Training, L.A.F.D. 80 1978 U.S. Navy, Fire School, San Diego CA. 40 " 1966 U.S. Army, Explosive Ordnance / Bombs 40 1964 Real Estate, Lumbleau School, L.A. / San Fernando CA.350 " 1960-1993 Graduated San Fernando High School 1960 Building Inventory Program - Life Safety NFPA 901 M - Diamond Placarding for Hazardous materials Expert Witness Municipal / Superior Court Expert - NFPA Handbook First major Felony Fireworks Investigation /Conviction in Los Angeles Earthquake Emergency Operations Date Deceirber 6, 1993 RECEI ,'ED CITY OF LA QUINTA APPLICATION T� �)vYRW P 12 17 ON F VOLUNTEER ADVISORY � v 'T 0 U i ;� TA ��ERK NAME: JUDY VOSSLER HOME ADDRESS: 46-555 CAMEO PALMS, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 (Must be a La Quinta resident and eligible to vote in the City.) BUSINESS ADDRESS: 49-499 EISENHOWER DRIVE, LA QUINTA, CA 92253 TELEPHONE: (HOME) (619) 5 6 4 -1216 (BUSINESS) (619) 5 6 4 - 4111 IF EMPLOYED, WHERE YOU WORK AND POSITION YOU HOLD: LA QUINTA HOTEL THROUGH DECEMBER 23, 1993. AS OF JANUARY 3, 1994 I WILL BE OFFICING AT KSL OFFICE, 56-140 PGA WEST BLVD., LA QUINTA, CA 92253. TELEPHONE (61-9-)-564 1988. KSL E}WN$; PGA WEST T n OTTTM +A unTFr r_nrF & TFNNTS RESORT LENGTH OF RESIDENCE IN LA QUINTA: 14 YEARS The following information will be used by the La Quinta City Council as a screening process to determine which applicants will be interviewed for appointment to the La Quinta Volunteer Advisory Board. Biographical sketch, including education, work experience, civic involvement and other background. Please be sure to include experiences relevant to duties of the position you seek. SEE ATTACHED BIO. 000291 APPLICATION, VOLUNTEER ADVISORY BOARD PAGE 2 What specific attitudes, skills, and/or expertise do you think you have which would enhance the work of the Volunteer Advisory Board? -GREAT ENERGY -ATTENTION TO DETAIL -GOOD ORGANIZATIONAL SKILLS Your name wil l be considered by the City Council upon receipt of your application. It is expected that the Council will appoint members to fill existing vacancies in January. PLEASE RETURN APPLICATION NO LATER THAN December 22, 1993 TO: ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 78 495 CALLE TAMPICO P. O. BOX 1504 LA QUINTA, CA 92253 THANK YOU FOR YOUR WILLINGNESS TO SERVE YOUR LOCAL GOVERNMENT. 0002821 ., . >y26 Golf & Tennis Resort NEWS Contact: Karen Oppenheim (619) 564-5757 ,UDY VOSSLER - GENERAL MANAGER Judy Vossler was appointed general manager at La Quinta Hotel Golf & Tennis Resort in June 1984. Ms. Vossler joined Landmark in 1980 and served as assistant manager for two years prior to her current position. During her association with the resort, she has overseen the remodelling program of the original guest casitas and coordinated a $45 million expansion program. "We are very excited about our growth and renovation that truly ranks La Quinta Hotel among the top destination resorts in the world," said Ms. Vossler. "To our Pete Dye championship golf, world -class tennis, and colorful historic hotel grounds, we have added 374 guest rooms - all in casitas; a 17,000 square foot ballroom - Salon de Fiesta; 20,000 square feet of resort shops which open onto a multi -level Plaza of vivid flowers and tile fountains; two additional restaurants, Morgans and the Adobe Grill, and up-to-date support facilities for hotel operations and administration. - more - 000283 49-499 Eisenhower Drive P.O. Box 69 In Quinta, California 92253 (619) 564-4111 - 2 - In addition to overseeing the day-to-day operation of the legendary desert hideaway which includes directing a staff of more than 900 employees, Ms. Vossler is active within the hospitality industry and the community. She is chairman of the Hospitality Industry & Business Council of the Palm Springs Desert Resorts Convention & Visitors Bureau and is a two -term past president and currently treasurer of the Desert Communities Hotel & Motel Association. She is on the board of directors of the La Quinta Historical Society and is vice president of the Harvest of Wellness Foundation. She is a*member of the Desert Hospital Foundation's Board of Governors and serves as board secretary for the American Cancer Society's Desert Palms Unit. Ms. Vossler is on the Board of Directors of the La Quinta Arts Foundation and is a member of its Arts League. She also works on special projects for the Children's Museum, the Global Aid Foundation and the Foundation for the Retarded of the Desert. In 1989 she spearheaded a "Celebrity Roast" event which raised $75,000 for the Betty Ford Center. She is actively involved in the Adopt -A -School Program with the Coachella Valley High School and is a member of the La Quinta Chamber of Commerce Education Committee. - more - - 3 - Ms. Vossler, who attended Oklahoma State University and is now an active alumna of Delta Delta Delta, was honored in 1987 by Bullock's as "A Woman of Achievement" and in 1988 by Soroptimist International of the Americas as one of the "Women of Distinction." In 1990 she was the corporate recipient of the Athena Award presented by the Palm Springs Chamber of Commerce and Plaza Motors. In 1991 she received the Global Aid Foundation's Stan Mooneyham Humanitarian Award. She also received a "Gamby Award" from the La Quinta Historical Society in recognition for her service to the La Quinta community, the valley and her assistance in collecting valuable data and memorabilia on the La Quinta Hotel and the early days in the valley. Most recently she was recognized by Columbia Artists and the Coachella Valley Community Concert Association for her devotion to the cultural growth of La Quinta. With her care and enthusiasm for the Coachella Valley evident in so much that she does, it is little wonder that her favorite retreat is The Living Desert. 10/93 000285 Cj `^q 4 4Qgwo COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: DISCUSSION OF MOBILE HOME RENT CONTROL SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: The City received a request from a number of mobile home residents asking the Council to consider adoption of a rent control ordinance. Council directed staff to research the issue and provide additional information. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: To be determined based upon Council direction. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Review the information and provide direction to staff. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: %,-A �-j po-'.t� E Y H AN, PLANNING DIRECTOR ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000286 nrJ19 CITY OF LA QUINTA MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 SUBJECT: DISCUSSION OF MOBILE HOME RENT CONTROL REGULATIONS BACKGROUND: On July 6, 1993, a petition was submitted to the City Council requesting the Council consider adoption of a rent control ordinance. Council directed staff to research the issue and provide further information. Each of the cities of the Coachella Valley were contacted regarding the issue of rent control. Of the eight cities (excluding La Quinta), two cities do not have rent control ordinances, the City of Indian Wells and the City of Desert Hot Springs. The remaining six cities and the County, have some form of a rent control ordinance. The comparison of these ordinances is attached as Exhibit 1. In addition to the Valley cities noted previously, ordinances from the following jurisdictions have also been received for review: San Rafael, San Jose, Capitola, Pacifica, Lancaster, and Simi Valley. Key issues which need to be addressed when considering the adoption of a rent control ordinance are as follows: the provision for adequate return of investment, eviction questions, assumable leases, vacancy control, the regulating of new units versus existing units, and automatic rent increases. The typical elements contained in a rent control ordinance are as follows: 1. Registration requirements which includes an annual fee to cover the cost of administration. 2. Creation of a rent control agency. 3. Rent roll back. 4. Rent increase formula. A. Annual increase based upon CPI or flat rate; and/or, B. Special increases to cover maintenance costs. 5. Rent adjustment procedures, noticing, hearing, evidence, judicial review. 6. Vacancy control, permissible grounds for eviction. 7. Enforcement remedies. Approximately 40 of the approximate 450 cities within the State of California have some form of mobile home rent control. urmn.lw_ 134 I 000287 Mobile home rent control regulations will impact three existing mobile home parks in the City. The mobile home park located on Highway 111 east of Dune Palms Road consists of approximately 32 units. The "Vista Dunes Mobile Home Park" located on Miles Avenue consists of 92 units. "Dune Palms Mobile Home Park" located on Dune Palms Road just east of the new high school, contains 102 units. The three mobile home parks contain a total of 226 units. Typically rent control regulations are adopted to resolve disputes such as rent increases and relocation of existing mobile homes when sold which impact the existing residents and mobile home park owners. The major cost associated with rent control ordinances is litigation to defend the Board/Commission decisions. Some cities have separate staff; or contract for a hearing officer and/or attorney services; or utilize the existing city attorney. Each of these options has an associated cost. Options: The City Council has the following options: 1. Direct staff and the City Attorney to prepare rent control regulations, determine staffing levels, and the necessary funding. 2. Not proceed with any action at this time. 3. Provide direction to staff. RECOMMENDATION: Review the information and provide direction to staff. MEMOJH.334 2 xi GJ 0 cti � G U ❑ O U ,O U 200 a O 00 0 u i a c a� o >' cd ai 3 d O o3 a�,�c as Ua� ��N�E a v c a w w °' 8 a a�i a�i c ON a 4) � � o b � o o U Cd � 0 x x o o °' 3 rZ 0 U Y cn tirx UU Zac �l oo • n � p � f� ° O. N '�� df Q ° ° C� y p z > vi U U V° O 00 ° vi � ci Jo- O A. U 3 r) w U U x O W ° f3 0n = g on •C U r_ 114 16 i N 0 W) 4;"' E- O o o„� "a C E . A,20 w 4, a� o vi Ell w >, .0o bU r. O 4 U V= 00 v,ow U r E N:�oor- ¢ it. u9 i o o N .,r O 1E U �a E p o w EO O p H p d ¢ U U en nnn9Rq ART IN PUBLIC PLACES MEETING MINUTES LA QUINTA CITY HALL - NORTH CONFERENCE ROOM DECEMBER 69 1993 The regular meeting of the La Quinta Art in Public Places Committee (APP) was called to order at the hour of 3:11 A.M. by Chairman John Walling. ROLL CALL: Committee Members Kay Wolff, Nancy Nard, Kathleen Smith -Schooley, Lia Gilbert, Kathryn Hull, & Chairman Walling. Committee Member Wolff moved to excuse Committee Member Robertson. Committee Member Hull seconded the motion and it carried unanimously. STAFF PRESENT: Department Secretary Betty Sawyer. I. CONSENT CALENDAR: A. Committee Member Hull asked if the Minutes of November 1, 1993 could be expanded on Page 2, under Other, Item A.2. to state that the issue the Committee would be discussing with the new City Engineer would be involving art in City projects at the earliest point. There being no other corrections, Committee Members Wolff/Nand moved and seconded a motion to approve the Minutes of November 1, 1993, as corrected and November 9, 1993, as submitted. The motion carried unanimously. B. Committee Member Wolff asked what the rate of interest was on the APP fund. Staff informed the Committee how the interest was earned and what the percent of interest was. There being no further questions, the financial statement was accepted unanimously. H. BUSINESS ITEMS: A. Presentation of Parks and Recreation Director regarding the Fritz Burns Park Clint Bohlen, Parks and Recreation Director gave a report of the status of the park. Following discussion it was suggested that the Mr. Bohlen and the representative of BSI (consultants contracted with to design the park) and the Committee at the Committee's meeting in January to discuss the possible inclusion of art in the park design. Mr. Bohlen encouraged the members to attend the public input meeting of January 10, 1994 regarding the park. APP12-6 1 0Op294 Art in Public Places December 6, 1993 2. Committee Members asked Mr. Bohlen to review the options that had been presented to Council, the public, and the reviewed by the Committee regarding a possible Cultural Arts Commission. Discussion followed regarding the options. B. Continued work on the Master Art Plan 1. Members reviewed the document page by page and made changes as needed. III. OTHER A. On-goingI,� ssues Chairman Walling informed the members that at the present time, further discussion with art consultants would be placed on hold until a decision was made by the City Council regarding a Cultural Arts Commission. B. Future Agenda Items 1. It was recommended that a representative of the Sunline be asked to speak with the Committee in January/February, 1994. 2. Further discussion regarding the Fritz Burns Park - BSI representative to meet with the Committee and the Parks and Recreation Department to discuss the park design. 3. Discussion with the new City Engineer sometime in January/February, 1994. 5. Continued work on the Master Art Plan. IV. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, it was moved and seconded by Committee Members Hull/Smith-Schooley to adjourn to a regular meeting of the Art in Public Places Committee on January 3, 1994 at 3:00 P.M. in the Planning and Development Department Conference Room. This meeting of the Art in Public Places Committee was adjourned at 5:00 P.M., December 6, 1993. APP12-6 2 000291 MINUTES DESIGN REVIEW BOARD CITY OF LA QUINTA A regular meeting held at the La Quinta City Hall 78-495 Calle Tampico, La Quinta, California December 1, 1993 I. CALL TO ORDER 5:30 P.M. A. Chairman Curtis brought the meeting to order at 5:30 P.M. and Planning Commissioner Marrs led the flag salute. II. ROLL CALL A. Present: Boardmembers Fred Rice, David Harbison, Randall Wright, D. James Campbell, Planning Commissioner Marrs, and Chairman Curtis. B. Chairman Curtis moved to excuse Boardmember Anderson and Boardmember Campbell seconded the motion. It carried unanimously. C. Staff present: Planning and Development Director Jerry Herman, Principal Planner Stan Sawa, and Department Secretary Betty Sawyer. III. BUSINESS SESSION A. Staff informed the Board that a request had been received from Century Homes for a special meeting of the Design Review Board on December 15, 1993, to consider their request for unit approval. DRB12-1 1. Boardmember Wright asked if the moratorium would be off by them. Staff explained the Interim Ordinance process and the length of time it would be in effect. 2. Chairman Curtis asked if this request was mute due to the Interim Ordinance. Staff stated the request complied with the ordinance. 3. Boardmember Wright asked if this was for Phase VII. Staff stated it was. Discussion followed regarding how the project was in compliance with the request. 1 Design Review Board Minutes December 1, 1993 4. Chairman Curtis asked why the need for a special meeting. Staff stated the applicant felt it would harm his project to wait the additional month for approval. 5. There being no further questions, Boardmembers Rice/Harbison moved and seconded a motion to hold a special meeting on December 15, 1993. The motion passed 4-1-1, with Boardmember Wright voting NO, and Planning Commissioner Marrs abstaining. B. Staff informed the Board that the owner of the restaurant within the Palm Royale Country Club was in attendance to request to be put on the agenda to have a review of his sign. 1. Chairman Curtis asked for staff's recommendation. Staff stated they did not feel the sign request was complete at this time. Chairman Curtis directed staff to place the item on the December 15th special meeting agenda and inform the applicant to get his application complete before that time. 2. Boardmember Wright asked if the applicant could have a temporary sign until this was approved. Staff stated that he was before the City Council on December 7th for approval of a tethered balloon advertising the restaurant. 3. Mr. Dan Millington, owner of the restaurant, asked if he could be allowed to explain his request at this time. Chairman Curtis reiterated that the Board would take no action at this time but he could speak to the Board. Mr. Millington went on to explain the purpose of the sign and his willingness to work with the Board and he would be willing to comply with all requirements. His concern was to have some type of sign up as soon as possible as this was the season and he felt he was missing out on customers because there was no sign advertising his business. Chairman Curtis stated it was not the Board purview to approve the sign, their purpose was to review the design of the sign and recommend approval to the Planning Commission. Mr. Millington thanked the Board for their time. C. SigApplication 93-225; a request of Norwest, Inc. for approval of a corporate sign for Norwest Financial located within the 111 La Quinta Center. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development Department. DRB12-1 2 000293 Design Review Board Minutes December 1, 1993 2. Mr. Jim Engle, representing Imperial Sign Company for the applicant, explained his request. 3. Boardmember Campbell asked what the depth of the letters would be. Mr. Engle stated they would be the same as they are now, 5-inches. 4. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Boardmembers Campbell/Rice to recommend approval of Sign Application 93-225, subject to conditions. Unanimously approved. D. Plot Plan 93-516; a request of TD Desert Development (Chuck Strother) for approval of preliminary plans for the main entry road and approval of landscaping and architectural plans for a racquet club within the Rancho La Quinta project. 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development Department. Staff went on to explain the problem with the Date Palm trees at the La Quinta Hotel parking lot. He noted a beetle had attacked the trees, toppling the head of the tree. Staff also noted the plans included the landscape design for the Phase I Casitas area. 2. Commissioner Marrs asked when the Palm trees were installed at the La Quinta Hotel. Staff stated they were installed in 1988. 3. Boardmember Harbison explained how and why the beetle that destroyed the trees attacks the trees. He further stated that the trees for this project appear to be planted in an area that should support the Palms with no problems. 4. Mr. Chuck Strother, applicant, explained the project to the Board. 5. Commissioner Marrs asked the applicant to explain the variety of Eucalyptus to be used. Mr. Strother stated it was the White Bark variety and as long as they were not over watered they would remain healthy and hearty. 6. Boardmember Harbison went on to explain further about the tree. 7. Chairman Curtis asked the applicant if he had any problems with the conditions as recommended by staff. Mr. Strother stated he had none. Chairman Curtis asked how the landscaping on both sides of the golf tunnel would be treated so no erosion occurs and there would be no safety problems at the top of the tunnel. Mr. Strother stated that the Engineering DRB12-1 3 000294 Design Review Board Minutes December 1, 1993 Department had placed conditions requiring fencing at the entry across the top of the tunnel to prevent this problem. He further stated that they had not determined a planting design but will be sure that the proper plants are planted. 8. Boardmember Campbell asked about the height of the racquet club and the seat walls. Mr. Strothers explained their location and the stucco material to be used. Boardmember Campbell further asked if the roof materials were to be the same as used on other public use buildings. Mr. Strothers stated it would be. 9. There being no further discussion, it was moved and seconded by Boardmember Harbison/Rice to recommend approval of the entry road design for Plot Plan 93-516 as submitted and conditioned with the applicant to pay particular attention to the type of Eucalyptus tree and ground cover to be used and as conditioned by staff. Unanimously approved. 10. It was moved and seconded by Boardmembers Campbell/Harbison to recommend approval of the landscaping and architectural plans for the racquet club and Casitas area to the Planning Commission as submitted and conditioned. Unanimously approved. E. Discussion of development standards 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development Department. 2. Boardmember Harbison submitted additional information for the landscaping standards. 3. Staff asked that the Board supply additional information as to the direction they wanted staff to take regarding the design guidelines. 4. Boardmember Wright asked that this item be continued to the meeting of December 15th, to give the Board additional time to review the information supplied by staff. 5. Chairman Curtis stated his concern to keep the Board focused mentioned areas for the Board to discuss. DRB12-1 4 000295 Design Review Board Minutes December 1, 1993 6. Boardmember Campbell asked what had been accomplished so far. Staff stated that a list of comprehensive plans submittal requirements to enable the Board to know what the project consisted of had been completed. Also the developer handbook (application procedures) had been modified to include the Design Review Board process. 7. Boardmember Campbell stated there needed to be more specific criteria to guide the developer and he did not feel this existed as of yet. He went on to volunteer to assist staff to put together a draft list of architectural guidelines for the Board's review . Staff stated their appreciation. 8. Chairman Curtis asked that Boardmember Campbell and staff work together to put this together. IV. CONSENT CALENDAR Chairman Curtis asked if there were any corrections to the Minutes of November 3, 1993. There being no additions or corrections, Boardmembers Curtis/Campbell moved and seconded a motion to approve the minutes as submitted. Unanimously approved. VI. ADJOURNMENT It was moved and seconded by Boardmembers Rice/Curtis to adjourn to a special meeting of the Design Review Board on December 15, 1993, at 5:30 P.M. This meeting of the La Quinta Design Review Board was adjourned at 6:20 P.M., December 1, 1993. DRB12-1 5 000296 COMMUNITY SERVICES COMMISSION MINUTES NOVEMBER 229 1993 I. CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the Community Services Commission was called to order at 7:00 p.m. in the La Quinta Civic Center Study Session Room. Chairman Best presiding. Pledge of Allegiance was led by the Chairman. ROLL CALL: MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioner Norris Bernard Commissioner Lawrence Best (Chairman) Commissioner Aldine Dickens Commissioner Susan Francis Commissioner Nancy Nard MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner B.J. Seaton (Vice Chairwoman) One Vacancy STAFF PRESENT: Clint Bohlen, Parks & Recreation Director Cristal Spidell, Secretary II It was moved by Commissioner Nard/Bernard to excuse Commissioner Seaton from the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. II. CONFIRMATION OF AGENDA 111. APPROVAL OF MINUTES It was moved by Commissioner Nard/Bernard to APPROVE the minutes of November 8, 1993 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. IV. ANNOUNCEMENTS None V. PUBLIC COMMENT Fred Wolff - 77-227 Ensenada - Mr. Wolff prefers an autonomous body in regards to the Cultural Arts Issue because he believes most members that are to be placed on the board come from autonomous bodies. He feels there is no need for the City Council to control the cultural and artistic community, and he feels City Council control would be restrictive and dangerous. MINI 1-22 1 0 0 0 2 9vii Lia Gilbert - 57-214 Merion - Ms. Gilbert believes that local government should not be in control of an Arts Commission, and that the arts should be left to the artists. She would like to see funding support from the City Council, but an autonomous relationship is best for an arts commission. VI. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIALS All written correspondence was received and filed. The Commissioners discussed the acceptance of complimentary Fine Crafts, Wine & All That Jazz passes. Commissioner Francis explained that the passes were free and of no value, therefore it is not necessary to claim them on an Economic Statement Report as indicated in the memorandum from the City Manager. Chairperson Best & Commissioner Bernard returned their complementary passes to Commissioner Francis. Chairperson Best suggested that if a Commissioner accepted the passes they should be reported on the Economic Statement form. VII. STAFF REPORTS A. Fritz Burns Park Development Update In response to a question from Chairperson Best, Mr. Bohlen advised that 13 bids were sent out for the repair of the tennis court lights at Fritz Burns Park, and that the ability to bond was an issue in regards to the fact that only two bids were submitted. AZ -Tech Electric was the only bidder. Their proposal is being presented to the City Council on December 7, 1993. B. Kidsline Program Statistics A Kidsline report was presented and the Commissioners briefly discussed the Monthly Summary date information. C. Cultural Affairs Advisory Body Staff reviewed the report with the Commission. Discussion by the Commissioners ensued. Commissioner Bernard requested clarification on the changes to the CSC role as described in the CSC Handbook. Commissioner Francis asked from where the addition of the Arts in Public Places Commission option came. Mr. Bohlen said it was an option he submitted after reading Seattle, Dallas, and Rancho Mirage Arts program descriptions. VIII. COMMISSION BUSINESS A. CULTURAL AFFAIRS ADVISORY BODY ISSUE Staff advised that Commissioner Seaton preferred Option D, and that she would like all three cultural organizations represented. MIN11-22 2 000298 Commissioner Francis compared autonomous verses not autonomous. She believes that freedom of expression should be allowed. A proposed model could become a group that governs the arts in La Quinta. Therefore, it would take on a reputation of art officials. It is important that artistic freedom is promoted whether or not it is an autonomous group. Commissioner Francis prefers Option B. Commissioner Bernard believes the CSC can stay where it is and function as it has in the past since part of its role is to form subcommittees. Chairperson Best feels promoting the general welfare of the City is important. A Cultural Arts Committee will improve the arts in the City as well as be responsible to the public and the citizens. He does not feel Option C is an option because, if the City funds the commission, the Council should have a say. Chairperson Best suggests Option B is good because it would create a fresh, new body, however, the staff idea of adding members to and expanding the role of the Art In Public Places Committee has merit. Commissioner Dickens prefers not to see anything taken away from the CSC no matter which Option is selected, yet prefers something to fill the gap in regards to arts and cultural affairs in the community. Commissioner Nard advised that she would like to see art programs to benefit the City and the citizens. She questioned what information was going to be provided to the Council members for their review. It was MOVED by Commissioner Bernard/Dickens to recommend to the City Council to: 1) maintain status quo using City Code 2.18 for the Community Services Commission as it reads; 2) allow the CSC through 2.18050 b. Establish Subcommittees to exercise the powers and duties of the Culture and Fine Arts Committee (2.18080 c.); 3) consult with public and private groups; 4) coordinate existing resources; and, 5) conduct studies. Motion failed 2-3 with Commissioners Francis, Nard, and Chairperson Best voting no. It was MOVED by Commissioner Francis/Nard to recommend Options B & C to the City Council with further discussion. Motion failed 2-3 with Commissioners Bernard, Dickens, and Chairperson Best voting no. It was MOVED by Chairperson Best/Nard to recommend Option B - Cultural Affairs Commission to the City Council. Motion carried 3-2 with Commissioners Francis, Dickens voting no. MINI 1-22 3 000293 It was MOVED by Commissioner Bernard to reconsider an amendment to the recommendation of Option B to the City Council to include formation of a Parks & Recreation Commission and a Human Relations Commission. The MOTION failed due to lack of a second. It was MOVED by Commissioner Dickens to recommend Options B & D to the City Council. The MOTION failed due to lack of a second. B. FINAL WORK PLAN It was MOVED by Commissioners Dickens/Nard to recommend adoption of the Work Plan as submitted to City Council. MOTION passed unanimously. C. JOINT MEETING WITH CITY COUNCIL ON DECEMBER 4, 1993 The CSC will meet from 9:00 to 10:00 a.m. in the East Conference Room. Staff will review the materials to be presented. The Commission will then adjourn to the Study Session Room/Caucus Room/Council Chambers for a Joint meeting with the City Council from 10:00 to 11:00. Topics will include future structure and tasks of the Community Services Commission. IX. NEXT MEETING DATE, TIME AND TOPIC December 13, 1993, 7:00 P.M. La Quinta Civic Center Study Session Room • Topics of Christmas Judging For December 20, 1993 • Work Plan • Joint Meeting Discussion • December 27th Meeting (cancel or not cancel) • Sharon Kennedy Appreciation Gift • Conference Attendance X. ADJOURNMENT It was MOVED by Commissioner Dickens/Nard to adjourn the meeting to the next regularly scheduled Community Services Commission meeting of December 13, 1993. Motion carried unanimously. Meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m.. n Director CRISTAL SPIDIELL Secretary II MIN11-22 4 0 19 r) 31) 0 INVESTMENT ADVISORY BOARD MINUTES November 10, 1993 The regular meeting of the La Quinta Investment Advisory Board was called to order at the hour of 5:30 P.M. by Chairman Lewis, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. PRESENT: Board Members Brown, Gilreath, Wilson and Chairman Lewis ABSENT: Board Member Sales OTHERS PRESENT: John Risley, Accounting Supervisor and Debbie DeRenard, Secretary I. PUBLIC COMMENT - None II. CONSENT CALENDAR A. Approval of the Minutes from the Meeting of October 13, 1993. MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Wilson/Gilreath to approve the minutes of October 13, 1993 as submitted. Motion carried unanimously. III. BUSINESS SESSION A. Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated August 31, 1993. In response to Board Member Wilson, Mr. Risley advised that the Deferred Compensation Plan is a retirement plan for the City employees. The employees can set aside a portion of their salary (a maximum of $7500 per year) and its tax deferred. The City receives quarterly statements from ICMA and the financial statements. are revised accordingly. The City does not have access to these funds. MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Gilreath/Brown to approve the Treasurers Report dated August 31, 1993. Motion carried unanimously. B. Transmittal of Treasurer's Report dated September 30, 1993. MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Brown/Wilson to approve the Treasurer's Report dated September 30, 1993. Motion carried unanimously. 000391 C. Continued Consideration of request to have the La Quinta City Council appoint an Investment Advisory Board Liaison or provide a specific task outline. Board Member Brown advised this was continued from the October 13, 1993 meeting. She further advised that Mr. O'Reilly did a good job in refining the memorandum. MOTION - It was moved by Board Member Brown/Wilson to approve the memorandum to request to have the La Quinta City Council appoint an Investment Advisory Board Liaison or provide a specific task outline. Motion carried unanimously. IV. STUDY SESSION - None V. OTHER - None VI. ADJOURNMENT MOTION - It was moved by Board Members Wilson/Brown to adjourn the meeting. Motion carried unanimously. 0003TL ey or COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: TRANSMITTAL OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC COMMENT: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS: SUMMARY: Transmittal of the November 30, 1993 Statement of Financial Position for the City of La Quinta. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File. Submitted By: SIGNATURE Approved for submission to City council '�L�k 1_17 J I -- ROBERT L. HUNT CITY MANAGER 000393 RE V E N U E SUMMARY ---- BY FUND `�- GL64 12/19/93 ACCOUNT BALANCES THRU 11/30/93 REMAINING FND DEPT OBJ SUB DESCRIPTION RECEIVED ESTIMATE ESTIMATE %COMP FUND 1 GENERAL FUND 1-3100-031-010 PROPERTY TAX 21911.76- 279000.00- 257088.24- 7.9 % 1-3100-031-012 DOCUMENT TRANSFER TAX 21921.89- 87400.00- 65478.11- 25.1 % 1-3100-031-020 SALES TAX 331879.09- 1165000.00- 833120.91- 28.5 % 1-3100-031-030 TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX 196633.39- 2004000.00- 1807366.61- 9.8 % 1-3100-031-031 FRANCHISE TAX 48575.39- 248000.00- 199424.61- 19.6 % 1-3100-031 ---OBJECT TOTAL 620921.52-* 3783400.00-' 3162478.48-* 16.4 % 1-3100------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 620921.52-** 3783400.00-** 3162478.48-** 16.4 % 1-3200-032-010 BUSINESS LICENSES 10210.25- 81600.00- 71389.75- 12.5 % 1-3200-032-012 ANIMAL LICENSES 2257.50- 5500.00- 3242.50- 41.0 % 1-3200-032-020 BUILDING PERMITS 126947.48- 222000.00- 95052.52- 57.2 % 1-3200-032-021 PLUMBING PERMITS 26068.80- 55500.00- 29431.20- 47.0 % 1-3200-032-023 ELECTRICAL PERMITS 24144.40- 40700.00- 16555.60- 59.3 % 1-3200-032-024 MECHANICAL PERMITS 11362.30- 22200.00- 10837.70- 51.2 % 1-3200-032-025 ENCROACHMENT PERMITS 48760.66- 70000.00- 21239.34- 69.7 % 1-3200-032-026 MISC. PERMITS 5822.00- 6000.00- 178.00- 97.0 % 1-3200-032 ---OBJECT TOTAL 255573.39-* 503500.00-* 247926.61-* 50.8 b 1-3200------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 255573.39-*' 503500.00-** 247926.61-'* 50.8 % 1-3300-033-022 MOTOR VEHICLE IN -LIEU 186716.80- 616000.00- 429283.20- 30.3 % 1-3300-033-023 OFF HIGHWAY LICENSE FEES 250.00- 250.00- .0 % 1-3300-033-024 MOBILE HOME LICENSE FEES 7.18- 7.18 .0 % 1-3300-033-025 RDA ADMINISTRATIVE FEES 446D47.52- 1012931.00- 566883.48- 44.0 % 1-3300-033-026 VEHICLE ABATEMENT REVENUE 5000.00- 5000.00- .0 % 1-3300-033 ---OBJECT TOTAL 632771.50-* 1634181.00-* 1001409.50-* 38.7 % 1-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 632771.50-** 1634181.00-** 1001409.50-** 38.7 % 1-3400-034-005 ANIMAL IMPOUND FEE 400.00- 2000.00- 1600.00- 20.0 % 1-3400-034-010 PLANNING a ZONING FEES 32589.00- 35000.00- 2411.00- 93.1 % 1-3400-034-011 ENGINEERING FEES 17289.25 12000.00- 29289.25- 144.1-% 1-3400-034-012 PLAN CHECK FEES 99210.22- 185000.00- 85789.78- 53.6 % 1-3400-034-020 SALE OF MAPS a PUBLICATIONS 4675.86- 8010.00- 3334.14- 58.4 % 1-3400-034-030 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 40000.00- 40000.00- .0 % 1-3400-034-040 LOT ABATEMENT 544.44- 21500.00- 20955.56- 2.5 % 1-3400-034 ---OBJECT TOTAL 120130.27-* 303510.00-* 183379.73-* 39.6 % 1-3400------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 120130.27-** 303510.00-** 183379.73-** 39.6 % 1-3500-035-010 MISCELLANEOUS FINES 2462.11-* 5500.00-* 3037.89-* 44.8 b 1-3500-435-011 MOTOR VEHICLE CODE FINES 1218.25-* 5550.00-* 4331.75-* 22.0 % 1-3500------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3680.36-*' 11050.00-** 7369.64-** 33.3 % 1-3600-036-010 INTEREST EARNINGS 42531.09-* 146100.00-* 103568.91-* 29.1 $ 1-3600------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 42531.09-** 146100.00-** 103568.91-** 29.1 % 1-3700-037-010 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 6102.55- 5000.00- 1102.55 122.1 b 1-3700-037-012 A.P.P. SUPPLY/ADMIN FEE 6000.00- 6000.00- .0 8 1-3700-037-013 88-1 AD CALCULATION 810.00- 810.00 .0 $ 1-3700-037-016 89-2 AD CALCULATION 1065.00- 1065.00 .0 % 1-3700-037-017 90-1 AD CALCULATION 1005.00- 1005.00 .0 % 1-3700-037-019 91-1 AD CALCULATION 2100.00- 2100.00 .0 % 1-3700-037-020 REIMBURSEMENTS 2126.09- 26000.00- 23873.91- 8.2 % 1-3700-037 ---OBJECT TOTAL 13208.64-* 37000.00-* _ 23791.36-* 35.7 % 1-3700-038-040 REVENUE/SR CENTER 16176.29-* 6400.00-* 9776.29 * 252.8 % 1-3700-100-001 KIDSLINE GRANT 11500.00- 7500.00- 4000.00 153.3 % 1-3700-100-002 OCJP GRANT 15800.00- 15800.00- .0 % 1-3700-100 ---OBJECT TOTAL 11500.00-* 23300.00-* 11800.00-* 49.4 % 1-3700-103-746 CASH OVER AND SHORT .10 * * .10-* .0 % 1-3700-600-000 LITIGATION SETTLEMENT 61560.00-* * 61560.00 * .0 % 1-3700-700-000 AB939 REVENUE 17689.38-* 85000.00-* 67310.62-* 20.8 % 000394 GL64 REVENUE SUMMARY ---- BY FUND \" 12/19/93 ACCOUNT BALANCES TEND 11/30/93 REMAINING FND DEPT OBJ SUB DESCRIPTION RECEIVED ESTIMATE ESTIMATE %COMP FUND 1 GENERAL FUND 1-3700------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 120134.21-** 151700.00-** 31565.79-** 79.2 $ 7575.00- 7575.00- .0 % 1-3725-000-001 LEISURE TRIPS 8040.00- 8040.00- .0 % 1-3725-000-002 ADULT SOFTBALL 800.00- 800.00- .0 $ 1-3725-000-003 ADULT VOLLEYBALL 3000.00- 3000.00- .0 i 1-3725-000-004 LEESURE CLASSES 720.00- 720.00- .0 $ 1-3725-000-005 ADULT BASKETBALL 1600.00- 1600.00- .0 i 1-3725-000-006 YOUTH BASKETBALL 1-3725-000-007 FRITZ BURNS PARR 68.75- 200.00- 131.25- 34.4 i 900.00- 900.00- .0 i 1-3725-000-008 MIDNIGHT THEATER 1-3725-000-009 CIVIC CONCERT SERIES 7500.00- 7500.00- .0 $ 3100.00- 3100.00- .0 $ 1-3725-000-010 EXPLORER CLUB 300.00- 300.00- .0 $ 1-3725-000-011 BOXING CLUB 1-3725-000-012 REVENUE SPORTS COMPLEX 300.00- 300.00- .0 i 1-3725-000-013 FRIENDS OF LQ YOUTH 5000.00- 5000.00- .0 % 1-3725-000 ---OBJECT TOTAL 68.75-* 39035.00-* 38966.25-* .2 $ 1-3725 ------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 68.75-** 39035.00-** 38966.25-** .2 $ 1-3950-000-000 TRANSFER IN 82682.01-* 82323.00-* 359.01 * 100.4 $ 1-3950------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 82682.01-** 82323.00-** 359.01 ** 100.4 i 1----------- FUND emu, 1878493.10-*** 6654799.00-*** 4776305.90-*** 28.2 % FUND 2 STATE GAS TAX FUND 2-3300-233-023 SECTION 2105 HWY USERS TAX 30046.32- 80740.00- 50693.68- 37.2 % 2-3300-233-024 SECTION 2106 25240.94- 64240.00- 38999.06- 39.3 i 2-3300-233-025 SECTION 2107 45840.59- 121160.00- 75319.41- 37.8 i 2-3300-233-026 SECTION 2107.5 4000.00- 3000.00- 1000.00 133.3 i 2-3300-233 ---OBJECT TOTAL 105127.85-* 269140.00-* 164012.15-* 39.1 i 2-3300-236-010 INTEREST EARNED 321.69 * 1000.00-* 1321.69-* 32.2-% 2-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 104806.16-** 270140.00-** 165333.84-** 38.8 % 2-3950-000-000 TRANSFER IN 10973.00-* 145336.00-* 134363.00-* 7.6 % 2-3950------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 10973.00-** 145336.00-** 134363.00-** 7.6 % 2----------- FUND TOTAL 115779.16-*** 415476.00-*** 299696.84-*** 27.9 % FUND 3 COMMUNITY PROTECT FUND 3-3300-336-010 INTEREST EARNED 9308.13-* 52500.00-* 43191.87-* 17.7 % 3-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 9308.13-** 52500.00-** 43191.87-** 17.7 % 3-3950-000-000 TRANSFER IN * 926500.00-* 926500.00-* .0 % "* 926500.00-** 926500.00-** .0 % 3-3950------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 3----------- FUND TOTAL 9308.13-*** 979000.00-*** 969691.87-*** 1.0 % FUND 12 FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 12-3300-033-015 F.E.M.A. REVENUE 34287.35-* * 34287.35 * .0 % 12-3300-833-111 CDBG - PROGRESSO DEL DESIERTO 10000.00- 10000.00- .0 % 12-3300-833-112 CDBG - SENIOR CENTER 500014.00- 500014.00- .0 % 12-3300-833 ---OBJECT TOTAL * 510014.00-* 510014.00-* .0 % 12-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 34287.35-** 510014.00-** 475726.65-** 6.7 % 12----------- FUND TOTAL 34287.35-*** 510014.00-*** 475726.65-*** 6.7 % FUND 14 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 86-1 14-3300-146-010 INTEREST EARNED 693.52-* * 693.52 * .0 % 14-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 693.52-** ** 693.52 ** .0 % 14----------- FUND TOTAL 693.52-*** *** 693.52 *** 000305 .0 % FUND 15 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 89-2 R E V E N U E SUMMARY ---- BY FUND' GL64 12/19/93 ACCOUNT BALANCES TRRU 11/30/93 REMAINING FND DEPT OHJ SUB DESCRIPTION RECEIVED ESTIMATE ESTIMATE %COMP 15-3300-156-010 INTEREST EARNED 819.22-* * 819.22 " .0 8 15-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 819.22-** ** 819.22 ** .0 8 15----------- FUND TOTAL 819.22-*** xxx 819.22 xxx .0 % FUND 16 CITY-WIDE ASSESSMENT DIST 89-1 16-3300-116-010 INTEREST EARNED 658.17-* 4100.00-* 3441.83-* 16.1 % 16-3300-833-114 LTNG/LNDSCPNG ASSESSMENT 45236.21-* 539789.00-* 494552.79-* 8.4 8 16-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 45894.38-*" 543889.00-** 497994.62-** 8.4 % 16-3700-037-010 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 534.98-* * 534.98 * .0 % 16-3700------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 534.98-** ** 534.98 ** .0 % 16----------- FUND TOTAL 46429.36-**" 543889.00-*** 497459.64-*** 8.5 % FUND 17 QUIMBY FUND 17-3300-176-010 INTEREST EARNED 5038.93-* 48750.00-* 43711.07-" 10.3 % 17-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 5038.93-** 48750.00-** 43711.07-** 10.3 % 17-3800-038-017 FEE IN LIEU PARKLAND DEDICATION * 25000.00-* 25000.00-* .0 % ** 25000.00-** 25000.00-** .0 % 17-3000 ------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 17----------- FUND TOTAL 5038.93-*** 73750.00-**" 68711.07-*** 6.8 % FUND 18 INFRASTRUCTURE FUND * 50000.00-* 50000.00-* .0 % 18-3300-033-030 CVAG CONTIBUTION 18-3300-186-010 INTEREST EARNED 16716.39-* 20000.00-* 3283.61-* 83.6 % 18-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 16716.39-** 70000.00-** 53283.61-** 23.9 % * 30000.00-* 30000.00-* .0 % 18-3400-034-030 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION ** 30000.00-** 30000.00-** .0 % 18-3400------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 18-3700-037-010 MISCELLANEOUS REVENUE 25000.00-* " 25000.00 * .0 % 18-3700------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 25000.00-** ** 25000.00 ** .0 % 18-3810-132-018 INFRASTRUCTURE FEES 349674.82-* 740000.00-* 390325.18-* 47.3 % 18-3810------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 349674.82-** 740000.00-** 390325.18-** 47.3 % * 500014.00-* 500014.00-* .O % 18-3950-000-000 TRANSFER IN "* 500014.00-** 500014.00-** .0 % 18-3950------- DEPARIMENT TOTAL 18----------- FUND TOTAL 391391.21-*** 1340014.00-*** 948622.79-*** 29.2 % FUND 19 EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 19-3300-120-010 INTEREST EARNED 617.85-* * 617.85 " .0 % 19-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 617.85-** "* 617.85 '* .0 % 19----------- FUND TOTAL 617.85-*** '** 617.85 *"* .0 % FUND 20 VILLAGE PARKING FUND 20-33OD-206-010 INTEREST EARNED 205.39-* 2000.00-* 1794.61-* 10.3 % 20-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 205.39-** 2000.00-** 1794.61-** 10.3 % 20-3700-104-020 VILLAGE PARKING LIEN AGREEMENT * 8838.00-* 8838.00-* .0 % "* 8838.00-** 8838.00-** .0 % 20-3700------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 20----------- FUND TOTAL 205.39-*** 10838.00-*** 10632.61-*** 1.9 % FUND 21 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 90-1 21-3300-216-010 INTEREST EARNED 2034.31-* * 2034.31 * .0 % 21-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 2034.31-** ** 2034.31 ** .0 % 21----------- FUND TOTAL 2034.31-xxx *** 2034.31 *** .0 % FUND 22 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 91-1 22-3300-221-010 INTEREST EARNED 5896.53-* * 5896.53 * .0 % 22-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 5896.53-** ** 5896.53 ** .0 %- 22----------- FUND TOTAL 5896.53-xxx xxx O Ox3 J 0 % 50003060 OL64 RE V ENUE SUMMARY ---- BY FUND 12/19/93 ACCOUNT BALANCES TBRU 11/30/93 FRD DEPT OBJ SUB DESCRIPTION RECEIVED FUND 23 ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES 23-3300-226-010 INTEREST EARNED 1250.42-* 23-3300-266-010 INTEREST 23-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 1250.42-** 23----------- FUND TOTAL 1250.42-*** FUND 24 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 92-1 ' 24-3300-227-010 INTEREST EARNED 15097.71-* 24-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 15097.71-•* 24-3700-105-024 PREPAYMENT SEWER ASSMT 92-1 258601.16-* 24-3700-109-024 BOND PROCEEDS 92-1 1692961.50-* 24-3700------- DEPARTMENT TONAL 1951562.66-•* 24----------- FUND TOTAL 1966660.37-*** FUND 39 SOUTR COAST AIR QUALITY 39-3300-190-010 INTEREST EARNED 155.23-* 39-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 155.23-** 39-3700-040-000 SO COAST AIR QUALITY CONTRIBUTION 4223.58-* 39-3700------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 4223.58-** 39----------- FUND TOTAL. 4378.81-*** FUND 54 92-1 AGENCY FUND 54-3950-000-000 TRANSFER IN " 54-3950------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL ** 54----------- FUND TOTAL '** REMAINING ESTIMATE ESTIMATE • 1250.42 * .0 t 13000.00-* 13000.00-* .0 t 13000.00-** 11749.58-** 9.6 t 13000.00-•** 11749.58-*** 9.6 t • 15097.71 " .0 t •* 15097.71 ** .0 t * 258601.16 * .0 t * 1692961.50 * .0 t ** 1951562.65 *• .0 t **• 1966660.37 "•• .0 t 725.00-* 569.77-* 21.4 t 725.00-** 569.77-•* 21.4 S 16500.00-* 12276.42-* 25.6 t 16500.00-** 12276.42-** 25.6 t 17225.00-**• 12846.19-*** 25.4 t R ••R * .0 t RR ,0 t **• .0 t 000307 - CITY OF LA QUINTA file: MOEXPRPT 07/01/93 TO 11/30/93 OPERATING EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY DEPARTMENT: REMAINING % EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDED GENERAL GOVERNMENT: LEGISLATIVE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE SENIOR CENTER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 199,739.84 181,392.21 41,334.06 100,860.15 5,979.09 190.16 224.58 0.00 ------------- 363,624.00 451,000.00 107,607.00 281,300.00 ------------- 158,105.07 269,417.63 66,048.36 180,439.85 --------- 56.5$ 40.3% 38.6% 35.9% -------------- TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT ---------- 523,326.26 6,393.83 ------------- 1,203,731.00 ------------- 674,010.91 --------- 44.0% -------------- ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES FINANCE PARRS & RECREATION POLICE FIRE NON -DEPARTMENTAL CIVIC CENTER BUILDING -OPERATIONS ----------- 94,929.63 173,991.18 30,913.00 363,004.55 2,892.01 192,386.81 91,407.04 358.59 721.46 1,094.40 0.00 0.00 3,993.86 0.00 224,325.00 398,929.00 189,311.00 1,775,058.00 20,000.00 316,750.00 294,535.00 129,036.78 224,216.36 157,303.60 1,412,053.45 17,107.99 120,369.33 203,127.96 42.5% 43.8% 16.9% 20.5% 14.5% 62.0% 31.0% BUILDING & SAFETY: BUILDING & SAFETY - ADMIN CODE ENFORCEMENT ANIMAL CONTROL BUILDING 120,970.23 93,448.93 36,987.25 72,980.08 ---------- 1,262.63 1,820.27 91.38 280.04 268,215.Otl 192,539.00 123,054.00 181,132.00 ------------ 145,982.14 97,269.80 85,975.37 107,871.88 ------------- --------- 45.6$ 49.5% 30.1% 40.4% TOTAL BUILDING & SAFETY -------------- 324,386.49 -------------- ----------- 3,454.32 764,940.00 ------------- 437,099.19 ------------ --------- 42.9% PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT - ADMIN PLANNING C.D.B.G. SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY TRUST 76,557.31 155,073.21 0.00 1,407.86 307.96 0.00 0.00 0.00 ----------- 194,818.00 466,530.00 10,000.00 5,527.00 ------------- 117,952.73 331,456.79 10,000.00 4,119.14 ---------------------- 39.58 31.9% 0.0% 0.0% TOTAL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT -------------- 233,038.38 -------------- 307.96 ----------- 696,875.00 ------------- 463,528.66 ------------- --------- 33.5% PUBLIC WORKS: ENGINEERING STREETS LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING 255,821.55 174,750.44 256,730.34 14,485.55 271.98 3,716.72 633,442.00 446,676.00 596,333.00 ------------- 363,134.90 271,653.58 335,885.94 ------------- --------- 42.7$ 39.2% 43.7% TOTAL PUBLIC WORKS -------------- 687,302.33 ------------- ----------- 18,474.25 ----------- 1,676,451.00 ------------ 970,674.42 ------------- 42.1% --------- TOTAL CITY OPERATIONS 2,717,577.68 34,798.67 7,560,905.00 4,808,528.65 36.4% CITY OPERATING EXPENDITURES SUMMARY BY FUND: GENERAL FUND GAS TAX FUND LIGHTING & LANDSCAPING FUND INFRASTRUCTURE (RENT ONLY) C.D.B.G. SOUTH COAST AIR QUALITY TRUST 2,282,543.74 30,809.97 6,408,869.00 4,095,515.29 36.1% 174,750.44 271.98 446,676.00 271,653.58 39.2% 258,875.64 3,716.72 619,333.00 356,740.64 42.4% 0.00 0.00 70,500.00 70,500.00 0.0% 0.00 0.00 10,000.00 10,000.00 0.0% 1,407.86 0.00 5,527.00 4,119.14 25.5% TOTAL CITY OPERATIONS 2,717,577.68 34,798.67 7,560,905.00 4,808,528.65 36.4% ' CITY OF LA QUINTA 07/01/93 TO 11/30/93 TRANSFERS OUT TO OTHER FUNDS: REMAINING 4 TRANSFERS OUT BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDED GENERAL FUND 0.00 134,363.00 134,363.00 0.0% FEDERAL ASSISTANCE FUND 0.00 500,014.00 500,014.00 0.0% QUIMBY FUND 0.00 525,000.00 525,000.00 0.0% INFRASTRUCTURE FUND 0.00 600,000.00 600,000.00 0.0% EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND 82,673.82 82,323.00 (350.82) 100.4% SO. COAST AIR QUALITY FUND 10,973.00 10,973.00 0.00 100.0% RDA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND PAN1 0.00 918,955.00 918,955.00 0.0% RDA DEBT SVC FUND PAA1 0.00 100,000.00 ------------- 100,000.00 ------------- 0.0% --------- TOTAL TRANSFERS OUT -------------- 93,646.82 2,871,628.00 2,777,981.18 3.3% 000399 CITY OF LA QUINTA O7/01/93 TO 11/30/93 CITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT EXPENDITURES SUMMARY: PROJECT FRITZ BURNS PARR SENIOR CENTER FACILITY WASHINGTON/TAMEICO SIGNAL PALM ROYAL PARK WASBINGTON/MILES STREET IMPROVEMENTS CIVIC CENTER TOTAL CITY CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS REMAINING % EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDED 439.26 0.00 1,499,907.00 1,499,467.74 0.0% 41,106.86 0.00 1,842,948.00 1,801,841.14 2.2% 4,154.57 0.00 110,759.00 106,604.43 3.8% 21,301.97 0.00 185,600.00 164,298.03 11.5% 0.00 0.00 20,000.00 20,000.00 0.0% 1,057,565.34 7,642.09 1,360,290.00 295,082.57 78.3% 1,124,568.00 7,642.09 5,019,504.00 3,887,293.91 22.6% 000310 0 0 m I I m M O N m N i O N N t'1 N r I m I N a I I N i I e i a I I W I o 0 I I I I a m H O N o i d I o m I m q N o r I m I P N a N 1 a I it PI I I I i I N I N H IC p N I N L04G INd Z7 a I d W I 1 O O N I N U F O t0 N i N WO N 'I N I N N N f1 rl .1 I 1D r N N m i a I N Q U Zi N I O I I I N 1 I W {payxy7 N m m r l O I N l m l N 1 N I I d i 1 N W yW67 y W w b i I 1 I I m m 1 I o l I I m l 1'1 N w H � WWi� .y W pl W Id 1 1 1 1 1 I I I I d \ fq W U C O 1 1 I O I 1 1 I I O I I I I � 1 1 II fn m I O i m II N m F I I li d e r I 1 e i + 1 I o li m m q N VO W In N n I fi i rl I I m a r1 a N I O I N PI iPOC 1 1 I [y U F G7 N O I 1 r1 IJ N t.f •i r 1 N 1 d I N r N x O w o W > m (Em M U U w 000311 O 0 1 m H 1 O Q N f1 1 .i I m m I a I ' I I O 1 I 1 I d I d p H pl z H m 1 m I IHG O 1 I a a o n 1 r ~ ~ \ q H I m E a i a I d i I d I m m E+ o m i m P rn pa O o N 1 N d l d I[1 fi I m �1 1 O 1 n I n � H 10-I �I ei I rl a N I rl � w i U H O OI i m W O o a� w m i b m •i I r-1 c� U' I H qqM I 1 1 1 a r� W �Si O z U H m a 1 1 m o I t�l I N I •i 01 I(1 I m m Pr1 I N m I I I I •i I '1 r1 O I m O d 1 d 1 ti N I N I m I 1 I I 'I I rl I I I •1 I I m o I 1 I I I I➢ 1 b m O 1 m O 01 I OI Yl m I ri I rl I n N I O ei I I I I I I I m o I I I I m 'I I 1 I o I I m m d O a o m I m In a I I I I 1 I N rl 1 d 1 1 1 1 d I I I 0 0 I I I l o 0 1 1 1 I o r o I o f O O 1 O m I z i p [.0 �1 IHa-I W O \ W mm W H [-I U a � u u M m m H O I d O I d 1(1 m I rl I r N I O I 000312 i s � W u�INW y`�•'� oF�*,RE��St' FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: TRANSMITTAL OF STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC COMMENT: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: DEPARTMENTAL REPORTS: E Transmittal of the November 30, 1993 Statement of Financial Position for the La Quinta Financing Authority. RECOMMENDATION: Receive and File. Submitted By: SIGNATURE Approved for submission to the Financing Authority �,, 1" 1, - hvc, —i ROBERT. L. HUNT CITY MANAGER 000313 OL64 12/19/93 FND DEPT OBJ SUB DESCRIPTION RR V E RUE SUMMARY ---- BY FUND ACCOUNT BALANCES THRU 11/30/93 RECEIVED FUND 70 LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY 70-3300-836-005 RENTAL INCOME 70-3300-836-010 INTEREST EARNED CIVIC CENTER BOND 70-3300-836-011 INTEREST 70-3300-836 ---OBJECT TOTAL 70-3300------- DEPARTMENT TOTAL 70 ----------- FUND TOTAL REMAINING ESTIMATE ESTIMATE .kIV 235000.00- 235000.00- .0 8 11909.84- 11909.84 .0 8 21972.00- 21972.00- .0 b 11909.84-* 256972.00-* 245062.16-* 4.6 8 11909.84-** 256972.00-** 245062.16-** 4.6 8 11909.84-*** 256972.00-*** 245062.16-*** 4.6 8 000314 LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY 07/01/93 TO 11/30/93 OPERATING EXPENDITURE SUMMARY DEBT SERVICE TRANSFER TO CONSTRUCTION TOTAL LA QUINTA FINANCING AUTHORITY REMAINING 8 EXPENDITURES ENCUMBERED BUDGET BUDGET EXPENDED 274,176.25 0.00 548,353.00 274,176.75 50.0% 0.00 ________________________________________________________________ 0.00 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.0% 274,176.25 0.00 551,353.00 277,176.75 49.7% 000315 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA DETERMINING THAT HIGH SCHOOL AGE RESIDENTS OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA SHOULD HAVE THE OPTION TO ATTEND THE NEW LA QUINTA HIGH SCHOOL FACILITY WHEREAS, the first high school facility to be located within the City of La Quinta is in the process of being developed; and WHEREAS, the proposed attendance boundary lines do not conform to municipal boundaries nor to a simple distance factor; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta determines that high school age residents of the City should have the option to attend the new high school facility as it would promote community pride and awareness, lessen commuting costs and environmental traffic and pollution impacts as an alternative to commuting to another City to attend high school; NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA FINDS AND DETERMINES THE FOLLOWING: Section 1. The Council requests that the District allow high school age residents of the City of La Quinta to elect to attend the new high school facility. Section 2. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18th day of January, 1994 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California 000316 Page 2 Resolution No. ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH City Attorney CERTIFICATION I, SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk of the City of La Quinta, California, do hereby certify the foregoing to be a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. adopted by the La Quinta City Council on January 18, 1994. SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California 000317 FROM : C.U.ZONE PHONE NO. : 619 399 4289 e Vn IT-Zk 3. December 22, 1993 City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Attention: Iohn Pena Mayor Post-V brand fckx transmittal memo Re: BusinessWeek Presidents Forum Dear John: ail T/" phone Fax �CC� Each year DusincssWcck magazine hosts a presidents forum during the Bob Hope Desert Classic. They invite about 1W CEOs to a meeting at the Hyatt. (;rand Champions in Indian Wells. The invitation is not transferable which insures that the real decision makers attend the conference. The Coachella Valley Economic Partnership has an opportunity to sponsor the Tournament Awards Ceremony and Cocktail Reception on the Saturday, February 18, 1994. The Sponsorship includes credit in the official program, the attendees address, a welcoming speech during the opening session, a booth and banners, and the sponsorship of the cocktail party. While we feel this is an excellent event to sell the Coachell;t Valley to top executives the sponsorship cost is $10,000. Would the City of La Quinta be willing to invest $1,000 toward this effort? We arc trying to raise the $10,000 front both the private and public sectors. The. response has been positive and we are about halfway to our $10,000 goal. La Quinta's sponsorship will include participation in our booth, and, more importantly, you as the Mayor will be one of the participants at the cocktail party. 000318 FROM : C.V.ZONE PHONE NO. : 619 399 4289 P02 Page 2 I have enclosed a preliminary meeting agenda for your information. John, I think this is an excellent opportunity for La Quinta to join ui the marketing effort. With PGA West Golf Club being the Host Course for the 1994 Tournament La Quinta gets some excellent, added exposure. I will call you next week to discuss this exciting event. F '. Stiles, Jr. tive Director. 00030 FROM : C.(,).ZONE PHONE NO. : 619 399 4299 P03 BusinessWeek MASTERING CHANGE The 1994 Business Week Presidents Forum Pre-v2md in association with Executive Jet International Gemini Consulting New York Life Insurance Company February 16-19,1994 Hyatt Grand Champions Palm Springs, California The Official Presidents Forum Vehicle provided by Chrysler Corporation Progmm Agenda -In -Progress as of December 3, 1993 0003 2. 0 FROM : C.U.ZONE PHONE NO. : S19 399 4289 PO4 The 1994 Business Week Presidents' Forum page 1 Wednesday, February 16 evening ft m RegisU'alioll Welcome Receptitut hosted by New York Life Thursday, February 17 7:00am - 8:00an coodoental areakfatmd 1Retkieadon p 8:00am - 8t05am [Bening Remarks V John W- Pa Week Scott Shuster, Editooiei 1lifiectm. Business Week Executive Programs 8:05am - 9:45am The Spirit of F-Ma p rim and the Establishment: Reviving Entreprmsrship in Large Corporations Wbat went wrong? We all believed big business was the engine of our prosperity. Yet Way, the real growth a A major economies is coming from smaller, more coptepremutlai companies. ShoAl the modern mwingement establishment turn in their MBAs and start taking wane lesamns from entrepreneurs? And is it really possible to re- ': i Mill an entrepreneurial split of enterprise in giant corporations_ Five panel members. 1 nli big company kadm wkb a passion for Rticking to the basics of enterprise, will share tkir stories. Lee M. Garn mill, Jr-, Executive Visa President, New York Life Insurance Company Ronald F. Hastings, CBO. The Lincoln Electric Company Jobs Martin. Chairman and CM Tow Bell Richard Santulli, C:hzda:itan and CEO, Executive Jet International SW Brian G. Wolrsoh, f.'bairman and Managing Director, Wembley Pic. 9A5am - 1 OO= 10 40am - 11:00am 11-00am - 11:05am Moderator: Lawry c. rmTeu, autber,'Searching for the Spirit of Enterprim' Refreshment Btcak Working Group Sermons Proceed to Ballroom 11.05am - 12:15pm blistering Change Through Business Transformation Creating a new corporaft nindset — one that accepts change as a ptncees, not a one-time event — is critical to ongoing business success. By focusing on transfor adon, sompmues are cresting awhole new corporate culture in which change is an integral part of the programs being iydemented to maintain competitive advantage- This session will describe the elements of annsfotmation and how the transformational process is delivering rapid, effective, focused change within successful companies_ Jerald A. Blumberg, Senior Vice president DuPont Nylon, DuPont Company Moderator: 000321 Francis J. Gouillarl, Senior Vice President, Gemini Consulting FROM : C.U.ZONE PHONE NO. : 619 399 4299 P05 The 1994 Business Week PresidnilV%i page 2 12:30pm - 2:00pm Luncheop ImmW Address Govemilm e A Mandate for Change John Rollwsges i sitryed remarkable success as Chairsiaa wd CEO of Cray Research, Inc, until hesre1jaed to serve as the Clinton adminisuados's Deputy Secretary of Commeme SwL Ike many nominations of private now traders. Rollwagen's nomins zemwq& off the ground_ Was John Roi vwt en treated fairly? How can nominguioa tlopoe ees he modified to attract high-r92wp &1iC servants from the private sector2 R,olsspat will describe how the process c"" be changed to create a successful transplaet ntfkwdm an organ rejection. Jahn A. Rafdspg, Farmer Chairman and CEO, Cjq Rteawch, Inc. 2:00pm - 2:10pm Return to Bt;totion 2.10pm - 3:40pm Mastering Cie on the New Frontier The liberalists affulern Europe and the economic aw almlog or China poise unprecedeneWappoftimitles for the internationally savvy executive. At last, European eorporadowbamaxess to the low -colt, well-educaled wro forces of the East — presenting the test chance to compete with the protiumetNorth America and Japan. Moreover, as an vast populations of Eastern Europe aW China increase thcir desire for new products hop markets open up for consumer goods Which corporations are already profftby forays into the new frontier? Whstadvice can they give corlwrate presidents sang entry or expansion in the East? Eatatttives with operations in Poland, Pmmis, and China share their insights and xtraiesies_ Jay Chan or V ,John Hoff nan, Principal, XRG—F-tcepdonal Resources Group 1M11iorv[ti, Atwident and (TO, Hungarian Telecommmications Company Limited ?4"el MmtmC t'tesideat. Danuta SP Gary 1w Raptq ttresidmd and CEO, General Elcmic ptanecs 3:40pm - 3:50pm Refreshment DoNk 3:50pm - 3:00pm Mastering rft Problem of Reach" Organizations wi many locations and geographic dispersion frequently encounter difficulty in cm*tently and effectively managing personnel. This results in failure to react to changes ad opportunities is the marketplace, muting customers' needs, and controlling etow Historically, most busincsscs have conowed these problems by adding layers of mraattleatern and staff. The realities of competing in the 1990's doinands a more creative, mWe fw4eaching solution to msater -the Px4aeuss of reach-0 Randall fir F1di, (hairman, Park City Group 5:00pin - 6:30pm Break 6:30pm - 7:15pm Cocktail Recrpsisa 7:15pm - 9:30pm The 1994 BtsWnew Week Presidents' Forum Dinner Keywte Address The Honot~oMe Jack Kemp, former Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development (1989-1992), U.S. Congressman (1971-1989) 0003?4 FROM : C.V.ZONE PHONE NO. : 619 399 42e9 P06 The 1994 Business Week Presidents' Foram page 3 Friday, February 18 7:30wn - 8.00am C TAiWntal Bfflktast 9:00am - 9:00am Buriness Week's Bus>nessMconomic/Political Update: Special Address 9:00am - 9:1Sam Refreshmes t Break 9:15am -1 IS= Work Fanitily, and Diversity in the Workpim Record numbers of women single parents, two career couples, and an aging population make the American woddctce a patchwork of diversity. As the demographics of the wod&xce dbange, misty corporations find that helping empkryees balance work and family can many help band a competitive edge. This "workw friendly" phenomenon is the concept behind flexible schedules, day care, job sharing and telecommuting. Pmponentt po;ot to incm ed productivity and reductions in t»mover and absenteeism. But how roams are them initiatives and do they wort? in an era of heightened global competition, m corporations really afford this? With America`s rapidly diversifying workforce, can anyone afford not to? How cat your organization respond to workers needs and bmetit by id Portion J. Gaya. Senior vice President of Human Resources% Levi Strauss dr Company parooy Kstbt arl, Chaimmm, President and CEO, Ethan Allen Inc. ,lames N. Sullivan, Vide ClWrrwan. Chevron Anthony L. Wstson, Preddent and Chief Executive Offm, Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York Faith wohl, Dhww of the Office of Workplace Initiatives 10:15am - 11:30am Corporate Governance and the Shareholder Revolution: Who's the Master? As American en1equises forge ahead with wholesale reslrt u ring for international competitiveness. obserwu%, insiders, press and pundits play the blame -game. Who's responsible for takering Amerkm competitiveness? Although most agree that better cocpaate governance will lead to better corporate performance, tba's where consensus ends. Whai are the ailemarivee to traditional American -style oagmrate governance? Which corporation arc the innovators in governance reform? What are the roles of the shareholder, C1ol). and president in governance and governance reform? Dale Hanson, C1def'Executive Officer. California PublicFmploycrn Retirement Systems Alice Kate, Fxecutive Vice President, General Counsel, New York Life Insurance Campwy Alfmd A. Pierrylaslni, Orman, President and C RO, C:eaber Products Company Shirley Vaung. Vice President, General Motara Chair. ,Lines H. Poweog, Chairman, B urson-Marsteller 11:30am Closing Remarks and Adjournment Kim Gantz, Foam Editor, Barine'.ss Week Executive Programs 7:00pdn - 9:00pm Tournament Awards Ceremony and Cocktail Reception n r� Hyatt Grand Champions HoWl 0 0 3 r_ 3 FROM : C.O.ZONE PHONE NO. : 619 399 4299 P01 The 1994 Business Week Presidents' T.rnnn page 4 53'ORTS AGENDA Friday, February 18 7:30am .11:30am Passes to the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic (for use on Saturday) will be available at the Business Week registration desk. 9:00am - 10:30am Spouse Actitntim RcI ftf ration Sign up ant the Dwt wen Week registration desk for golf, tennis, shopping, or sightseeing. t 1:45am - 5:00pm The Business Weds Presidents' Forum Golf Tournament of Presidents The Business Week Presidents' Forum Colf Tournament of Spouses Shotgun strut time 13:30pm Indian Wells t iolf Remit Driving Range +Golfers assemble a t tie Hyatt Grand Champions Golf Center for cart pickup, assignments to foutsomM. am an mawnent instructions. Box lunches inclixIlIng weft drinttt will be. provided_ For those rot plapirtg in either tournament, additional space will be available for recreationalpiny at fir time the Tournament begins_ 12:30pm-1.00pm Hyatt Grand Cbanapkms Tamil Center opens for warm-up before Tournament. 1:00pm - 4:00pm The Business Wack Presidents' Forum Tennis Tournament of Presidents The Business Week Presidents' Forum Tennis Tournament of Spouses Hyatt C"rrntd (larepions Tennis Center Players assemble at tie Hyatt Coand Champions Tennis Center for assignments and taun meat iasbvcdm. Beverages will be saved courtside. Lunch is at player's own expense. For those not phr*t in the Tournament. adUitional tennis courts will be available at 1:00PRL 1:30pm Spouse Activities Transportation for shopping and sightseeing will be available throughout the aflernoon. Shuttles will depart fmm front entrance of tale Hyatt Grand Champions. Transportation will be made availble bused an sign-ups received Friday morning. 7:00pm - 8.00pm Tournament Awards Ceremony and Cocktail Reception ,M.0--t._, FROM : C.V.ZONE PHONE NO. : 619 399 4299 P02 The 1994 Business Week Presidents' Fartim s e 5 Saturday, February 19 6:30am Crolf We times available at individual expense. Golfers should reserve we times dimcft with the Hyatt Grand Champions Golf Center. 7:00arn TC091is Cotut limes sv3d*k at individual expense. Tamis players should reserve court times there with the Hyatt cmd Champions Tema Center. 9:OOatu - 4:30pm The Bob Hope Chrysler Classic PGA West Golf Club Buses will depart from frtxnt ennnnce of the Hyatt Grand Champions for the Bob Hope C3a7sier Classic Golf Tournarnent every hour on the hour and on the half hour Qe. 9:0mand 9:30nm)- Trangwrtation to aril from the tournament will be provided thinushmil the day until tlx: end of tournament play. 9:00am - 4:30pm Buxiness Week Hospitality Room at the Tournament Clubhouse A taunameut lW will be provided which allows acLuss to the tournament grounds and to tine clubhouse where guests will be provided lunch and bcvcmges in Business Week 's exclusive hospitality dialing rmxn. 9:15am Bum will depart fmtn the Bob Hope Chrysler Classic Golf Tournament for We Hyatt Grand Champions every hour at a quarter lhw the hour and a quarter to the htwr (i.e. 9:15am and 9:45am), ihnnutdtout the day. 0003?5 ce;t,y uE 4vQuii«fw COUNCIL MEETING DATE: ITEM TITLE: January 18, 1994 Weed Abatement/Lot Cleaning Assessments for Placement On 94/95 Property Tax Roll AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: SUMMARY: The purpose of this hearing is to provide the Council the opportunity to hear and consider all public objections and protests, if any, to the report filed with the Council containing a description of each real property parcel cleared or cleaned by the City of La Quinta. Notices of tonight's public hearing were sent to the property owners advising them of the hearing date. No written communications have been received regarding this matter. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: None RECOMMENDATION: Following public comment and close of the public hearing, it is recommended Council: Adopt the proposed Resolution to place the cost of cleaning said lots on the 1994/95 property tax rolls. Submitted by: BUILDING AND SAFETY DEPARTMENT TOM HARTUNG BUILDING AND SAFETY DIRECTOR Approved for submission t City Council ROBERT L. HUNT CITY MANAGER 000326 RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA ASSESSING LIEN AND PROVIDING FOR COLLECTION ON TAX ROLLS ON CERTAIN PROPERTY FOR COSTS OF ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE WHEREAS, Chapter 11.72 of the La Quinta Municipal Code provides for the declaration and determination of certain conditions of property to be a public nuisance and further provides for the abatement of said nuisance by certain procedures including abatement by the City and collection of the cost of said abatement on the tax rolls; and WHEREAS, in accordance with said abatement procedures, the Building and Safety Director of the City of La Quinta, as agent of the City Manager, has determined that a public nuisance exists on the following described premises, and has given the notice required by law, and the owner thereof has failed to appeal said determination and has failed to abate said nuisance as required in said notice; and WHEREAS, in accordance with said abatement procedure, the Building and Safety Director has, by contract, provided for the abatement of said public nuisance on said properties and has filed a report thereon with the City Council and the City Council has conducted a hearing on said report and the assessment of said costs against said properties. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta does hereby RESOLVE as follows: 1. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and declares that the City has abated a public nuisance on each of the following described premises and has conducted a hearing on assessment of the costs of said abatement in the time and manner as required by law and further determines that there were no objections or protests to assessments of said costs by any interested party. 2. The City Council hereby finds, determines, and orders that the report of the Building and Safety Director relative to assessment of costs is hereby approved and the City Council hereby orders that the following costs are hereby assessed as liens against the following properties and the amount of said assessment shall be collected at the time and in the manner of ordinary property taxes: 000327 Resolution No. 94- January 18, 1994 Page 2 ASSESSOR'S COST TO 25% ADMIN. PARCEL # ABATE COST TOTAL HARBUCK, CARL 769-084-004 150.00 37.50 187.50 GLAZER, SIMON 773-123-004 150.00 37.50 187.50 ADAMS, MARION 774-153-015 150.00 37.50 187.50 FISCHER, MICHAEL 646-311-015 150.00 37.50 187.50 FISCHER, MICHAEL 646-311-016 150.00 37.50 187.50 CAPITOL CONSTRUCTION 646-311-003 150.00 37.50 187.50 BETTERLEY, WM. A. 646-312-020 150.00 37.50 187.50 KIRK, KAREN 646-313-007 150.00 37.50 187.50 MILLER, M. M. 646-313-014 150.00 37.40 187.50 SWEET, DOROTHY E. 646-312-037 150.00 37.50 187.50 YARU, DOROTHY E. 646-313-005 150.00 37.50 187.50 YARU, THOMAS C. 646-313-006 150.00 37.50 187.50 LA QUINTA ASSOC. 604-251-001 150.00 37.50 187.50 LA QUINTA ASSOC. 604-251-002 150.00 37.50 187.50 LA QUINTA ASSOC. 604-251-003 150.00 37.50 187.50 LA QUINTA ASSOC. 604-251-004 150.00 37.50 187.50 LA QUINTA ASSOC. 604-252-006 150.00 37.50 187.50 LA QUINTA ASSOC. 604-252-012 150.00 37.50 187.50 La QUINTA ASSOC. 604-252-013 150.00 37.50 187.50 LA QUINTA ASSOC. 604-252-024 150.00 37.50 187.50 LA QUINTA ASSOC. 604-252-025 150.00 37.50 187.50 LA QUINTA ASSOC. 604-252-026 150.00 37.50 187.50 LA QUINTA ASSOC. 604-252-027 150.00 37.50 187.50 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed to transmit a certified copy of this Resolution to the tax collector of the County of Riverside and said tax collector is hereby requested to collect the amount of each assessment herein at the time and in the manner of ordinary property taxes. PASSED, AND APPROVED and ADOPTED this 18st day of January, 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: John J. Pena City of La Quinta, CA 000328 Resolution No. 94- January 18, 1994 Page 3 ATTEST: Saundra L. Juhola, City Clerk City of La Quinta, CA APPROVED AS TO FORM: STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH City Attorneys 000329 COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING ON TENTATIVE TRACT 27835 FOR APPROVAL OF SEVEN RESIDENTIAL AIR SPACE CONDOMINIUM LOTS, RACQUET CLUB LOT, AND MISCELLANEOUS LOTS ON 36± GROSS ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 48TH AVE., WEST OF DUNE PALMS ROAD (EXTENDED) WITHIN RANCHO LA QUINTA APPLICANT: TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT (CHUCK STROTHER) SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: This tentative tract map is a part of th'e project previously known as "The Pyramids". The project will ultimately consist of two golf courses, a maximum of 1500 dwelling units, and 80 guest cottages. To date, one golf course has been constructed, with perimeter improvements currently being installed and the models are under construction. This tentative tract map is the second processed for Rancho La Quinta. The property within this tentative tract map is a portion of previously approved Tentative Tract 24545 which was approved for the previous owners, but never recorded. The Planning Commission considered this item at its meeting of December 14, 1993, and unanimously (4-0, Commissioner Marrs absent) recommended approval, subject to conditions. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt Resolution 94- , approving Tentative Tract 27835, subject to the attached conditions. Submitted by: - '1�1 A A-J &"Vw� J Y H AN, PLANNING DIRECTOR Approved for submission to City Council: hN 117T t : liLl.�J� ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000330 FROM: DATE: CASE NO. CITY OF LA QUINTA MEMORANDUM HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT JANUARY 18, 1994 TENTATIVE TRACT 27835 REQUEST: SUBDIVISION OF 36±GROSS ACRES INTO SEVEN AIR SPACE CONDOMINIUM LOTS, A RACQUET CLUB LOT, AND MISCELLANEOUS LOTS APPLICANT: TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT (CHUCK STROTHER) OWNER: TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, MARK ELGIN, PRESIDENT ENGINEER: THE HOLT GROUP LOCATION: SOUTH SIDE OF 48TH AVENUE, WEST OF DUNE PALMS ROAD (EXTENDED) WITHIN RANCHO LA QUINTA GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: G (GOLF COURSE/OPEN SPACE) AND LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL, 2-4 DU/AC) ZONING: R-2 20,000/PD ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT #90 WAS CERTIFIED BY THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR THE PREVIOUS SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 127-E) WHICH ENCOMPASSED A MORE EXTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL THAN THAT .APPROVED BY SPECIFIC PLAN 84-004. AN ADDENDUM EIR WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY OF LA QUINTA IN CONJUNCTION WITH SPECIFIC PLAN 84-004, IN NOVEMBER, 1984. APPROPRIATE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE SPECIFIC PLAN. THEREFORE, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS DEEMED NECESSARY. 000331 MEMOSS.191 2 ISSUES: Background The project site is a part of Specific Plan 84-004, which was approved by the City on November 20, 1984. In addition to the specific plan, a Development Agreement also exists on this property. Recently, Tentative Tract 27840, which is immediately to the west, was approved by the City Council. This tentative tract map is located on the south side of 48th Avenue immediately west of Dune Palms Road if it was extended into this project. The La Quinta Evacuation Channel borders the tract on the easterly side. The property to the east of the Evacuation Channel is a future phase of the project which has not yet been planned. To the west of this project is the existing golf course, while to the south is the temporary golf clubhouse and golf course. Project Proposal This tentative tract map proposes seven residential lots for air space condominium lots, a future golf clubhouse lot, two lots for parking, a Coachella Valley Water District water well lot, a racquet club and pool area lot, and other miscellaneous lots. Six of the residential lots are proposed to contain Casita (duplex) products. The tentative tract map shows the general layout of these duplex units. Proposed Lot 7 shows the future pool area, tennis court, and racquet club structure. Lot E is proposed to be a parking lot for the golf course clubhouse on Lot 8. Presently, there is a temporary golf course clubhouse on Lot 8. The attached Planning Commission staff report for the meeting of December 14, 1993, provides additional information regarding the proposed tentative tract map (see Attachment #1). Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission considered this request at its meeting of December 14, 1993. During the Planning Commission consideration of this item, no citizens from the audience spoke regarding the project. The Planning Commission had several general questions regarding the project but did not add or modify any conditions. The Planning Commission on a unanimous vote (4-0 with Commissioner Marrs absent) adopted a resolution recommending approval of the tentative tract map to the City Council, subject to conditions (see Attachment #2). FISCAL IMPACT/ANALYSIS: The specific plan for this property allows a total of 1500 single family residential units and 80 guest cottages. This proposed map along with the first tentative tract map approved (Tentative Tract 27840) would bring the number of approved residential units to 219 of the potential 1500 units. The map as drafted along with the Conditions of Approval are in compliance with the previously approved specific plan and development agreement. MEMOSS.191 3 00033? The Planning Commission felt that the tentative tract map request was acceptable and recommended approval subject to conditions. Findings Findings to approve this tentative tract map can be made and are contained in the draft Council resolution. RECOMMENDATION: Move to adopt Resolution 94- , approving Tentative Tract 27835, subject to the attached conditions. Attachments: 1. Planning Commission staff report dated December 14, 1993 2. Planning Commission minutes dated December 14, 1993 3. Tentative Tract 27835 exhibit (City Council only) MEMOSS.191 0 0 0 3 3� RESOLUTION NO. 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA2 CALIFORNIA APPROVING A SEVEN LOT RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION ON APPROXIMATELY 36+ ACRES GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTH OF 48TH AVENUE AND WEST OF DUNE PALMS ROAD CASE NO. TENTATIVE TRACT 27835 - TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of La Quinta, California, did, on the 14th day of December, 1993, hold a duly -noticed Public Hearing as requested by TD Desert Development to subdivide 36+ acres into a seven residential lot single family residential subdivision with associated streets, common area and recreation lots, generally located on the south side of 48th Avenue, west of Dune Palms Road, more particularly described as follows: PORTIONS OF PARCELS 2, 5, 89 & 9 OF PARCEL MAP 20469 WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, did on the 18th day of January, 1994, hold a duly noticed public hearing to consider this request and the recommendation of the Planning Commission; and, WHEREAS, said Tentative Map has complied with the requirements of "The rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" as amended, Resolution No. 83-63, that an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) and addendum EIR have been adopted. Therefore, no additional environmental documentation is deemed necessary; and, WHEREAS, at the Public Hearing held on January 18th, 1994, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments of all interested persons desiring to be heard, said Council did make findings to approve said Tentative tract map; and, WHEREAS, at said Public Hearing, said Tentative Tract Map 27835 was approved by the La Quinta City Council based on said findings and subject to certain conditions; and, WHEREAS, the La Quinta City Council on September 21, 1993, did find the following facts to justify approval of said tentative tract map: 1. The design and improvements of the approved Tentative Tract 27835 are consistent with the current goals and objectives of the La Quinta General Plan. 2. Tentative Tract 27835 is consistent with current standards of the Municipal Zoning and Land Division Ordinances. 3. The subject site is physically suitable for residential and recreational development. RESOCC.007 000334 RESOLUTION 94- 4. The design of Tentative Tract 27835 and its related improvements are not likely to cause environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish and wildlife or their habitat provided that approval conditions related to mitigation measures for the flora, fauna, and archaeological resources are complied with during project development. 5. The design of Tentative Tract 27835 and the type of improvements are not likely to cause public health problems nor would they conflict with existing public easements. 6. There is no evidence to suggest that approval of Tentative Tract 27835 could have a major adverse impact on the environment. 7. The location and appearance of the proposed dwelling units will be made compatible with the area in which the development is located. 8. The proposed private circulation system will provide for the safe and efficient movement of vehicles within the project, and the use of small private streets within some areas of the project will not impact the overall safety of the future residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California, as follows: 1. That the above recitations are true and correct and constitute the findings of the Council in this case; 2. That it does hereby concur with the environmental determination and grant approval of the above -described Tentative Tract 27835, for the reasons set forth in this Resolution and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval as recommended by the La Quinta Planning Commission. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council, held on this 18th day of January, 1994, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN PE A, Mayor City of La Quinta RESOCC.007 000335, 6 RESOLUTION 94- ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California RESOCC.007 000339 CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION 94- CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - RECOMMENDED TENTATIVE TRACT 27835 - RANCHO LA QUINTA JANUARY 18, 1994 GENERAL: 1. Tentative Tract Map 27835 shall comply with the requirements and standards of the State Subdivision Map Act and the City of La Quinta Land Division Ordinance, unless otherwise modified by the following conditions. 2. This tentative tract map approval shall expire and become void within two years after City Council approval unless extended pursuant to the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 3. Prior to recordation of final map, the issuance of a grading or building permit for construction of any building or use contemplated by this approval, the applicant shall obtain permits and/or clearances from the following public agencies: - City Fire Marshal - Public Works Department - Planning and Development Department - Riverside Co. Environmental Health Department - Desert Sands Unified School District - Coachella Valley Water District - Imperial Irrigation District - California Regional Water Quality Control Board (NPDES Permit) Applicant is responsible for any requirements of the permits or clearances from those jurisdictions. If the requirements include approval of improvement plans, applicant shall furnish proof of said approvals prior to obtaining City approvals and signatures on the plans. Evidence of said permits or clearances from the above mentioned agencies shall be presented to the Building Division at the time of the application for a building permit for the use contemplated herewith or the Engineering Department prior to recordation. 4. This approval shall be in compliance with all applicable conditions and applicable provisions of Specific Plan No. 84-004 and applicable Development Agreement. 5. Provisions shall be made to comply with the terms and requirements of the City's adopted Infrastructure Fee program in effect at the time of issuance of building permits. 6. Construction shall comply with all local and State building code requirements as determined by the Building and Safety Director. 00033'7 CONAPRVL.112 8 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 27835 - Rancho La Quinta January 18, 1994 7. Applicant shall insure that landscaping plans and utility plans are coordinated to provide visual screening of above -ground utility structures. 8. Applicant shall submit a copy of the proposed grading, landscaping and irrigation plans to the Coachella Valley Water District for review and approval with respect to the District's Water Management Program. TRACT AND BUILDING DESIGN 9. Development of the project site shall comply with tentative tract map Exhibit A, as contained in the Planning and Development Department's file for Tentative Tract 27835, and the following conditions, which conditions shall take precedence in the event of any conflict with the provisions of the tentative tract map. 10. The development of custom, single-family lots shall be governed by the following: A. Prior to issuance of an occupancy permit for any house within Tentative Tract 27835, landscaping/groundcover shall be installed and appropriately maintained. B. All roof -mounted equipment shall be screened from view at all sides by design of the house. All ground -mounted mechanical equipment shall be screened from view by methods approved by the Planning and Development Department. C. No two-story units shall be allowed within 75-feet of 48th Avenue per the specific plan approval. D. All dwelling units shall have a minimum two car garage measuring 20-feet by 20- feet in overall size. The garage can be either attached or detached. 11. Any minor changes in lot mix, sizes, lines, or shapes, or street alignments, shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Development Department prior to any final map approvals for recordation. PUBLIC SERVICES AND UTILITIES 12. All existing and proposed utilities adjacent to or on the proposed site shall be installed in underground facilities. Electric power lines over 66KV are not subject to this requirement per the specific plan. 13. In areas where hardscape surface improvements are planned, underground utilities shall be installed prior to construction of the surface improvements. The applicant shall provide certified reports of utility trench compaction tests for approval of the City Engineer. 000338 CONAPRVL.112 9 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 27835 - Rancho La Quinta January 18, 1994 14. All conditions and requirements of the Coachella Valley Water District shall be met as noted in their letter dated November 10, 1993, on file in the Department of Planning and Development. MANAGEMENT: 15. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall submit to the Planning Director the following documents which shall demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City that the open space/recreation areas and private streets and drives shall be maintained in accordance with the intent and purpose of this approval. A. The document to convey title; and B. Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions to be recorded; and, C. Management and maintenance agreement to be entered into with the unit/lot owners of this land division. The approved Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions shall be recorded at the same time that the final subdivision map is recorded. A Homeowners' Association with the unqualified right to assess the owners of the individual units for reasonable maintenance costs, shall be established and continuously maintained. The association shall have the right to lien the property of any owners who default in the payment of their assessments. Such lien shall not be subordinate to any encumbrance other than a first deed of trust, provided that such deed of trust is made in good faith and for value and is of record prior to the lien of the Homeowners' Association. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 16. Tract phasing plans, including phasing of public improvements, shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Engineer and the Planning and Development Department prior to recordation of any final map under this tentative map. The applicant shall develop tract phases in the order of the approved phasing plan so that improvements required of each final map are complete prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy within subsequent final maps. IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT 17. The applicant shall construct, or enter into a secured agreement to construct, the on- and off -site grading, streets, utilities, landscaping, on -site common area improvements, and any other improvements required by these conditions before approval of any final map(s) under this tentative tract map. 000339 CONAPRVL.112 10 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 27835 - Rancho La Quinta January 18, 1994 Improvements to be made or agreed to shall include removal of any existing structures or obstructions which are not part of the proposed improvements. 18. If tract improvements are phased with multiple final maps, off -site improvements (ie: streets) and tract -wide improvements (ie: perimeter walls, common -area and setback landscaping, and gates) shall be constructed or secured prior to approval of the first final map unless otherwise approved by the engineer. The City Engineer may consider proposals by the applicant to stage the installation of off -site and tract -wide improvements with development of two or more phases within the tentative map. DEDICATIONS 19. The applicant shall dedicate public street right of way and utility easements in conformance with the City's General Plan, Municipal Code, applicable specific plans, and as required by the City Engineer. Dedications required of this tract include: A. Avenue 48 - half of 110' right of way Street right of way geometry for cul-de-sacs, knuckle turns and corner cut -backs shall conform with Riverside County Standard Drawings #800, #801, and #805 respectively unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. 20. The applicant shall dedicate common -area setback lots, of minimum width as noted, adjacent to the following street rights of way: A. Avenue 48 - 20' Minimum widths may be used as average widths for meandering wall designs. Where sidewalks, bikepaths, and/or equestrian trails are required, the applicant shall dedicate blanket easements over the setback lots for those purposes. 21. The applicant shall vacate vehicle access rights to the following streets from lots abutting the streets: A. Avenue 48 Access to these streets shall be restricted to street intersections and approved emergency access locations. 11 CONAPRVL.112 000340 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 27835 - Rancho La Quinta January 18, 1994 22. The applicant shall dedicate any easements necessary for placement of and access to utility lines and structures, park lands, drainage basins, common areas, and mailbox clusters. 23. The applicant shall cause no easements to be granted or recorded over any portion of this property between the date of approval by the City Council and the date of recording of any final map(s) covering the same portion of the property unless such easements are approved by the City Engineer. TRACT DESIGN 24. The requirements of the City's off-street parking ordinance shall be met concerning all supplemental accessory facilities. The Applicant shall provide sufficient off-street parking opportunities, as determined by the City Engineer, to discourage on -street parking by residents or guests. GRADING 25. Prior to occupation of the project site for construction purposes, the Applicant shall submit and receive approval of a fugitive dust control plan prepared in accordance with Chapter 6.10, La Quinta Municipal Code. In accordance with said Chapter, the Applicant shall furnish security, in a form acceptable to the city, in an amount sufficient to guarantee compliance with the provisions of the permit. 26. A thorough preliminary engineering, geological and soils engineering investigation shall be conducted. The report of the investigation ("the soils report") shall be submitted with the grading plan. 27. A grading plan shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer. The plan must meet the approval of the City Engineer prior to approval of any final map(s). The grading plan shall conform with the recommendations of the soils report and shall be certified as adequate by a soils engineer or an engineering geologist. A statement shall appear on the final map(s), if any are required of this development, that a soils report has been prepared pursuant to Section 17953 of the Health and Safety Code. Prior to issuance of any building permit the applicant shall provide a separate document bearing the seal and signature of a California registered civil engineer, geotechnical engineer, or surveyor that lists actual building pad elevations. The document shall, for each building pad in the tract, state the pad elevation approved on the grading plan, the as -built elevation, and shall clearly identify the difference, if any. The data shall be organized by tract phase and lot number and shall be cumulative if the data is submitted at different times. CONAPRVL. 112 O 0 0 3 11 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 27835 - Rancho La Quinta January 18, 1994 DRAINAGE 28. The tract shall be graded to permit storm flow in excess of retention capacity to flow out of the tract through a designated overflow outlet and into the historic drainage relief route. The tract shall be graded to receive storm flow from adjoining property at locations that have historically received flow. 29. Storm water run-off produced in 24 hours during a 100-year storm shall be retained or channeled in facilities on the adjacent golf course or piped to the adjacent CVWD stormwater channel. Drainage from Lot C and Lot G shall not be conveyed via surface drainage or culverts without the approval of the City Engineer. The tributary drainage area for which the applicant is responsible shall extend to the centerline of adjacent public streets. 30. In design of retention facilities, the percolation rate shall be considered to be zero unless the applicant provides site -specific data that indicates otherwise. A trickling sand filter and leachfield of a design approved by the City Engineer shall be installed to percolate nuisance water. The sand filter and leach field shall be sized to percolate 22 gallons per day per 1,000 square feet of drainage area. Retention basin slopes shall not exceed 3:1. If retention is on individual lots, the retention depth shall not exceed two feet. If retention is in one or more common retention basins, the retention depth shall not exceed six feet. 31. The design of the tract shall not cause any change in flood boundaries, levels or frequencies in any area outside the tract. STREET AND TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS 32, The City is contemplating adoption of a major thoroughfare improvement program. If the program is in effect 60 days prior to recordation of any final map for this development, the development shall be subject to the provisions of the ordinance. If this development is not subject to a major thoroughfare improvement program, the applicant shall design and construct street improvements as listed below. 33. Improvement plans for all on- and off -site streets and access gates shall be prepared by a registered civil engineer. Improvements shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the La Quinta Municipal Code, adopted Standard Drawings, and as approved by the City Engineer. CONAPRVL.112 13 00034? Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 27835 - Rancho La Quinta January 18, 1994 Street pavement sections shall be based on a Caltrans design procedure for a 20-year life and shall consider soil strength and anticipated traffic loading. The minimum pavement sections shall be as follows: Residential 3.0" a.c./4.50" a.b. Collector 4.011/5.00" Secondary Arterial 4.0"/6.00" Primary Arterial 4.5"/6.00" Major Arterial 5.511/6.50" If the applicant proposes to construct a partial pavement section for use during development of the tract, the partial section shall be designed with a strength equivalent to the 20-year design strength. 34. Improvements shall include all appurtenances such as traffic signs, channelization markings, raised medians if required, street name signs, sidewalks, and mailbox clusters approved in design and location by the U.S. Post Office and the City Engineer. Mid -block street lighting is not required. 35. The City Engineer may require miscellaneous incidental improvements and enhancements to existing improvements as necessary to integrate the new work with existing improvements and provide a finished product conforming with City standards and practices. This may include, but is not limited to, street width transitions extending beyond tract boundaries. 36. The following street improvements shall be constructed to conform with the General Plan street type noted in parentheses: A. Lots A, C & G - 26' (18+18 for one-way couplet on Lot Q. Lots A, C & G shall be posted "No Parking" with a sufficient number of signs that at least one sign is clearly visible from each potential on -street parking opportunity. B. Lot B - 36' (20+20 for one-way couplet at entry drive). LANDSCAPING 37. The applicant shall provide landscape improvements in the setback lots along the following streets: A. Avenue 48 CONAPRVL.112 14 000343 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 27835 - Rancho La Quinta January 18, 1994 The applicant is encouraged to minimize steep slope designs within the perimeter landscaping setback areas. Use of lawn shall be minimized with no lawn or spray irrigation within 5-feet of street curb. 38. Landscape and irrigation plans for landscaped lots, common retention basins and park facilities shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. Landscape areas shall have permanent irrigation improvements meeting the requirements of the City Engineer. Common basins and park areas shall be designed with a turf grass surface which can be mowed with standard tractor -mounted equipment. Landscape and irrigation plans shall meet the requirements of and be signed by the Planning Director, the City Engineer, the Coachella Valley Water District, and the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner. QUALITY ASSURANCE 39. The City is contemplating adoption of a quality -assurance program for privately -funded construction. If the program is adopted prior to the issuance of permits for construction of the improvements required of this map, the applicant shall fully comply with the quality -assurance program. If the quality -assurance program has not been adopted, the applicant shall employ construction quality -assurance measures which meet the approval of the City Engineer. 40. The applicant shall employ or retain California registered civil engineers, geotechnical engineers, or surveyors, as appropriate, who will provide, or have his or her agents provide, sufficient supervision and verification of the construction to be able to furnish and sign accurate record drawings and certify compliance of all work with approved plans, specifications and applicable codes. 41. Upon completion of construction, the applicant shall furnish the City reproducible record drawings of all plans signed by the City Engineer. Each sheet of the drawings shall have the words "Record Drawings," "As -Built" or "As -Constructed" clearly marked on each sheet and be stamped and signed by the engineer or surveyor certifying to the accuracy of the drawings. FIRE DEPARTMENT 42. Schedule A fire protection approved Super fire hydrants (6" X 4" X 21/2" X 21/2) shall be located at each street intersection spaced not more than 330 feet apart in any direction with no portion of any frontage more than 165 feet from a fire hydrant. CONAPRVL.112 15 000344 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 27835 - Rancho La Quinta January 18, 1994 43. The water mains shall be capable of providing a potential fire flow of 2500 gpm and an actual fire flow available from any one hydrant shall be 1500 gpm for two hours duration at 20 psi residual operating pressure. 44. Prior to recordation of the final map, applicant/developer shall furnish one blueline copy of the water system plans to the Fire Department for review/approval. Plans shall conform to the fire hydrant types, location, and spacing, and the system shall meet the fire flow requirements. Plan shall be signed/approved by a registered civil engineer and the local water company will sign the following certification: I certify that the design of the water system is in accordance with the requirements prescribed by the Riverside County Fire Department.". 45. The required water system including fire hydrants shall be installed and accepted by the appropriate water agency prior to any combustible building material being placed on an individual lot. 46. Gates installed to restrict access shall be power operated and equipped with a Fire Department override system consisting of Knox key operated switches, series KS-2P with dust cover, mounted per recommended standard of the Know Company. Improvement plans for the entry street and gates shall be submitted to the Fire Department for review/approval prior to installation. 47. If public use type buildings are to be constructed, additional fire protection may be required. Fire flows and hydrant locations will be stipulated when building plans are reviewed by the Fire Department. MAINTENANCE 48. The applicant shall make provisions for continuous maintenance of landscaping and related improvements. 49. The applicant shall maintain the landscaped areas of the subdivision such as common lots, landscaped setbacks and retention basins until those areas have been accepted for maintenance by the City's Landscape and Lighting District or a homeowner's association (HOA). The applicant shall maintain all other improvements until final acceptance of tract improvements by the City Council. FEES AND DEPOSITS 50. The applicant shall pay all deposits and fees required by the City for plan checking and construction inspection. Deposit and fee amounts shall be those in effect when the applicant makes application for the plan checks and permits. CONAPRVL.112 16 000345 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 27835 - Rancho La Quinta January 18, 1994 MISCELLANEOUS 51. On- and off -site grading, drainage, street, lighting, landscaping & irrigation, gate, and perimeter wall plans shall be submitted to the Engineering Department for plan checking. The plans are not approved for construction until they have been signed by the City Engineer. 52. Prior to issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for buildings within the tract, the applicant shall install traffic control devices and street name signs along access roads to those buildings. 53. Appropriate approvals shall be secured prior to establishing any construction or sales facilities, and/or signs on the subject property. 54. Restroom facilities for the groundskeepers shall be provided in the vicinity of golf course, and a permanent golf course and homeowners maintenance facility shall be constructed on the property to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Development. 55. All lighting facilities shall comply with Chapter 9.210 (Outdoor Light Control) and be designed to minimize light and glare impacts to surrounding property. All lighting to be installed, including street and common area, shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning and Development Department. 56. Applicant/Developer shall work with Waste Management of the Desert to implement provisions of AB 939 and AB 1462. The applicant/developer is required to work with Waste Management in setting up the following programs for this project: A. Developer shall prepare a plan to provide enlarged trash enclosures for inclusion of separate facilities for storage of recyclables such as glass, plastics, newsprint and steel & aluminum cans. B. Developer shall provide proper on -site storage facilities within the project for green waste associated with golf course and common area maintenance. Compost materials shall be stored for pick-up by Waste Management, or an authorized hauler for transport to an appropriate facility. C. Curbside recycling service shall be provided in areas where no centralized trash/recycling bins are provided or utilized. 57. The specific plan requires ten acres of land to be dedicated for park purposes. 7.8 acres has been dedicated to date. The balance of 2.2 acres shall be paid as a in -lieu fee prior to recordation of the final map. CONAPRVL.112 17 000346 Conditions of Approval Tentative Tract 27835 - Rancho La Quinta January 18, 1994 58. Per the specific plan Conditions of Approval, a contribution of $100,000 as a fire mitigation measure, shall be paid prior to issuance of the first building permit for production homes or any custom homes. 59. A complete pedestrian and bicycle path system shall be provided within the project. The design shall be subject to the approval of the Planning and Development Director. 60. Per the specific plan, a noise study shall be completed prior to sidewalk and perimeter wall construction beginning to insure compliance with applicable noise standards. 61. The Dune Palms entry design layout (traffic) shall be approved by the Engineering Department, Fire Marshal, and the Planning and Development Department prior to recordation of the final tract map. 62. The parking lot layout for Lot "E" shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Development and Engineering Departments. Landscape design for said parking lot shall be approved by the Planning and Development Department. 63. Lot "F" shall be used as a parking lot for Phase II of the Casita product. The lot shall be installed prior to final occupancy of the tenth unit in Phase II. CONAPRVL.112 18 000347 ATTACHMENT 1 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 1993 CASE NO.: TENTATIVE TRACT 27835 REQUEST: APPROVAL OF A TENTATIVE TRACT MAP FOR SEVEN RESIDENTIAL AIR SPACE CONDOMINIUM LOTS, RACQUET CLUB LOT, AND MISCELLANEOUS LOTS ON 36f GROSS ACRES. APPLICANT: OWNER: ENGINEER: LOCATION ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION: GENERAL PLAN LAND USE DESIGNATION: ZONING: TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT (CHARLES R. STROTHER) TD DESERT DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, MARK ELGIN, PRESIDENT THE HOLT GROUP SOUTH SIDE OF 48TH AVENUE WEST OF DUNE PALMS ROAD (EXTENDED) WITHIN RANCHO LA QUINTA ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT #90 WAS CERTIFIED BY THE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE FOR THE PREVIOUS SPECIFIC PLAN (SP 127-E), WHICH ENCOMPASSED A MORE EXTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL THAN THAT APPROVED BY SPECIFIC PLAN 84-004, OF WHICH THIS PROJECT IS A PART. APPROPRIATE MITIGATION MEASURES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED AS CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR THE SPECIFIC PLAN. THEREFORE, NO FURTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW IS DEEMED NECESSARY. G (GOLF COURSE/OPEN SPACE) AND LDR (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL 24 DU/AC) R-2 209000/PD PCST..157 000348 19 The property is a part of Specific Plan 84-004 which was approved by the City on November 20, 1984. In addition to the specific plan, a Development Agreement also exists on this property. Recently, Tentative Tract 27840, which is immediately to the west, was approved by the City Council. This tentative tract map is located on the south side of 48th Avenue immediately west of Dune Palms Road if it was extended into this project. The La Quinta Evacuation Channel borders the tract along the easterly side. The property to the east of the Evacuation Channel is a future phase of this project. To the west of this project is an existing golf course while to the south the temporary golf club house and golf course exists. PROJECT PROPOSAL: This tentative tract map proposes seven residential lots for air space condominium units, future golf club house lot, two parking lot lots, a CVWD water site lot, the racquet club and pool area lot, and other miscellaneous lots. Six of the residential lots are proposed to contain Casitas (duplex units) products. The tentative tract map shows the general layout of these residential units. Proposed Lot 7 shows the future pool area, tennis courts, and racquet club structure. Lot E is proposed to be a parking lot area for the golf course clubhouse on Lot 8. Presently, there is a temporary golf course clubhouse on Lot 8. Along the northern side of the tract, access is provided through the main entry road from Washington Street. This road will continue eastward beyond the La Quinta Evacuation Channel when that area develops. Access from 48th Avenue to the project will be provided at Dune Palms Road. This entry is anticipated to be a resident only entrance. Circulation through the tract will be provided by a series of loop roads. The most westerly road will provide primary access to the racquet club and future golf course clubhouse and adjacent parking lot. The interior loop road which will empty on the main loop road will provide access to the Casitas units. This road is proposed to be 26-feet wide and will not allow parking on either side. In lieu of on -street parking, the applicant is proposing that parking bays, driveway parking, and garage parking take its place. The applicant has submitted an exhibit which indicates off-street parking for the Casitas units. For Phase I which is west of the racquet club, and the initial units to be constructed, the applicant shows for the 32 Casitas units, 28 off street parking bays, a minimum 48 driveway parking bays, and 64 garage parking spaces. This amounts to 4.4 spaces per Casita unit. For Phases 11 and III which are east of the racquet club, a total of 4.25 spaces per Casita is shown. The applicant further notes that the golf course parking lot is at the southern end of the Casita area and could provide overflow parking. Additionally, Lot F which is located at the northeast corner of the site, adjacent to the Dune Palms Road entry, is noted as a parking and landscaping lot. A minimum of 15 parking spaces could be provided within this lot. However, its location is near the Phase H area and would be inconvenient for use for Phase I. 000343 PCST.157 20 Generally speaking, the Casita pad elevations are 9 to 14 feet higher than that of the pool and racquet club area. The pad elevations are also higher than the surrounding golf course to the west and south. Approximately two thirds of tract area are proposed to drain via subsurface storm drains to the La Quinta Evacuation Channel with the remaining one third of the tract draining to either the existing golf course or existing lake #1 which is to the west of Lot 1. ANALYSIS: The specific plan for this property allows a total of 1500 single family residential units and 80 guest cottages. This proposed map along with the first tract map approved (Tentative Tract 27840), would bring the number of approved units to 219 of the potential 1500 units. The map as drafted is in compliance with the previously approved specific plan and Development Agreement. In situations where parking is not permitted on street, there is always a concern that adequate off street parking for guests is provided. The applicant has provided off street parking which is relatively well spaced out throughout the residential areas. Based on the off street parking bays and driveway parking, approximately 2.4 spaces per unit is provided. For most normal situations, this amount of parking should be adequate. For overflow situations when a person has a party there is overflow parking available in the golf clubhouse parking area. The Engineering and Fire Department have reviewed this map and feel that with conditions, it is acceptable. ]FINDINGS: Findings to recommend approval of this tentative tract can be made and are attached in the draft resolution. By adoption of Resolution 93- , recommend approval of Tentative Tract 27835 to the City Council subject to the attached conditions. Attachments: 1. Location map 2. Aerial view eyAbit- 4. Comments from other City Departments and agencies PCST.157 000350 21 LL a ESTABLISHED IN 1916 AS A PUBLIC AGENCY LA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT POST OFFICE Box 105a • COACHELLA, CALIFORNIA 922M • TELEPHONE (619) 3W2061 DIRECTORS OFFICERS TELLISCODEIIAS, PRESIDENT THOMAS E. LEVY. GENERAL MANAGER-041EF ENGINEER RAYMOND R. RUMMONDS, VICE PRESIDENT BERNARDINE SUTTON. SECRETARY DHN W. McFADDEN OWEN McCOOK ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER DOROTHY MDELAY REDWINE AND SHERRILL. ATTORNEYS THEODORE J. FISH November 10, 1993 Planning Commission City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, California 92253 Gentlemen: File: 0163.1 lun�( I Nov 15 1993 CI OF L P1�IAINING Un� OULYI� ' kPAArMENT Subject: Tentative Tract 27835. Portion of the North Half of Section 32, Township 5 South, Range 7 East, San Bernardino Meridian This area is protected from stormwater flows by a system of channels and dikes, and may be considered safe from stormwater flows except in rare instances. This area is designated Zone X on Federal Flood Insurance rate maps which are in effect at this time. A portion of this area is adjacent to the right-of-way of the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. We request that the developer be required to install suitable facilities to prohibit access to this right-of-way. The developer shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Coachella Valley Water District prior to any construction within the right-of-way of the La Quinta Evacuation Channel. This includes, but is not limited to, surface improvemenLS, drainage inlets, landscaping, and roadways. The district will furnish domestic water and sanitation service to this area in accordance with the current regulations of this district. These regulations provide for the payment of certain fees and charges by the subdivider and said fees and charges are subject to change. The district will need additional facilities to provide for the orderly expansion of its domestic water system. These facilities may include wells, reservoirs and booster pumping stations. The developer will be required to provide land on which some of these facilities will be located. These sites shall be shown on the tract map as lots to be deeded to the district for -such purpose. 000352. TRUE CONSERVATION USE WATER WISELY 24 Planning Commission -2- November 10, 1993 Plans for grading, landscaping, and irrigation systems shall be submitted to Coachella Valley Water District for review. This review is for ensuring efficient water management. If you have any questions please call Bob Meleg, stormwater engineer, extension 264. RF:lmf%e21TT27835 cc: Don Park Riverside County Department of Public Health 79-733 Country Club Drive, Suite D Bermuda Dunes, California 92201 Yours very truly, Tom Levy General Manager -Chief Engineer 000353 25 RIVERSIDE COUNTY COLS BYRD, SHERIFF Sheriff 82-695 DR. CARREON BLVD. • INDIO, CA 92201 • (619) 342-8990 November 1 City of La Quinta Planning & Development Division 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta CA 92253 Atten: Stan Sawa Principal Planner RE: TT #27835 Dear Mr. Sawa: -�1 Regarding the above mentioned project, we have the following comments from a crime prevention point of view. Regarding Proiect Design - All parking areas, entrances/exits and walkways should contain ample lighting which will deter criminal activity and provide a safer environment for all residents. The project entrances should also be well lighted with street addresses highly visible to aid any responding emergency vehicles in locating the facility. We recommend that address numbers be mounted on contrasting background. The numbers should be of sufficient size to be legible from the roadway and should be situated near the roofline on the corners of the residence. High pressure sodium lights are recommended as they provide the greatest amount of light per kilowatt and are the least expensive to operate. All residential doors should have an industrial quality key and latch system. Deadbolt locks are suggested for all exterior doors. The locks should be installed using three inch set screws to provide maximum benefits. All exterior doors without windows should have peepholes installed to allow good visibility of the outside area without having to open the door. Windows should not be placed close enough to doors, which would allow persons to break glass and unlock the door by hand. Shrubbery and bushes should be trimmed low to the ground to eliminate hiding places for criminals and to allow better visibility from the street for patrolmen. Windows should never be concealed by vegetation. 000354 26 Page 2 EIR Letter TT #27835 11-12-93 The crime prevention measures outlined in this letter are merely suggestions and are not required as a prerequisite for plan approval. We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the project from a law enforcement point of view. Sincerely, COIS BYRD, SHERIFF Ronald F. Dye, Captain Indio Station Commander CB:RD:gt 000355 27 ATTACHMENT 2 Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1993 AYES: Commissioners Adolph, Ellson, Barrows. NOES: None. ABSENT: ABSTAIN: None. --� C. Tentative Tract 27835; a request of TD Desert Development for approval of a tentative tract map for seven residential air space condominium lots, racquet club lot, and miscellaneous lots on 36± gross acres. PC12-14 1. Principal Planner Stan Sawa presented the information contained in the staff report, a copy of which is on file in the Planning and Development Department. Staff informed the Commission that a condition was going to be added regarding artifacts until staff found that the specific plan covered the matter. 2. Commissioner Adolph asked how access to the channel would be restricted. Staff stated that CVWD had not addressed that. 3. Commissioner Adolph asked if the condition regarding the artifacts was specific as to how the artifacts would be cared for. Staff stated it would be specific regarding what type of discovery work would be done on the east versus what had been done on the west side of the development. Commissioner Adolph stated his concern that a condition be added whereby any artifacts found would be held in La Quinta and not sent out of town. Chairwoman Barrows stated the City needed to consider how these artifacts would be stored. 4. Commissioner Ellson asked if there was any provision for the storage of bicycles in the vicinity of the racquet club. Staff stated they were not aware of any provisions at this time but a condition could be added to the plot plan (PP 93-516). 5. Commissioner Ellson asked if the parking for the pool will be in a central location and if the pool and tennis club would be open to the Casita members. Staff stated they would defer to the applicant. 6. There being no further questions of staff, Chairwoman Barrows opened the public hearing. Mr. Chuck Strother stated he was in agreement with all the conditions. 00035C W Planning Commission Minutes December 14, 1993 7. Mr. Strother went on to answer the above questions. He stated that any screening of the evacuation channel would have to be approved by CVWD and at present they have not done any land planning for this portion of the tract. They would probably plant the channel as part of the golf course to the east with the planting going up to the backyards of the homes. If any portion was sold then they might install boundary walls. 8. Mr. Strother stated that in reference to the racquet club and the associated amenities, that all the amenities were for the exclusive use of all owners of Rancho La Quinta and the golf members. 9. Chairwoman Barrows asked if the development was planned so that bicycles could be ridden throughout. Mr. Strother stated they were included in the circulation plan and he would have no problems with a condition being added requiring bicycle racks, since they were planning on providing them anyway. 10. Chairwoman Barrows asked if there was any provision for the use of golf carts instead of vehicles for the internal circulation. Mr. Strother stated they would encourage it and the streets would accommodate it. 11. There being no further questions, Chairwoman Barrows closed the public hearing. 12. Commissioner Ellson asked if staff had any problem with the parking. Staff stated they did not. 13. There being no further questions, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners Adolph/Abels to recommend approval of Tentative Tract 27835 to the City Council by adoption of Planning Commission Resolution 93-045. ROLL CALL VOTE: AYES: Commissioners Adolph, Ellson, Abels, Chairwoman Barrows. NOES: None. ABSENT: Commissioner Marrs. ABSTAIN: None. of Washington Street right-of-way. Planning Director Jerry Herman the applicant to continue this January 11, 1994. PC12-14 received a request of 000357 W jk �=' > CEO OE T�'Q�� COUNCIL MEETING DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT 93-039. AN AMENDMENT TO TITLE 9, PLANNING AND ZONING OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING INTERIM HOUSE SIZE, AND COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS WITHIN RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS APPLICANT: CITY OF LA QUINTA SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: 3 The Planning Commission considered the draft regulations on December 14th and 28th, 1993. The Commission listened to public testimony and received written correspondence on the draft regulations. The Commission made changes to the original draft which are reflected in the report. On a 4-1 vote (Commissioner Adolph voting no), the Commission recommended the Council adopt the regulations. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: None. APPROVED BY: RECOMMENDATION: 1. Move to take up Ordinance by title and number only and waive further reading. 2. Move to introduce Ordinance on first reading. 3. Move to adopt Resolution 94- , establishing fees for the Compatibility Review process. Submitted by: Approved for submission to City Council: Y HE AN, PLANNING DIRECTOR ROBERT L. HUNT, CITY MANAGER 000353 CC#18 CITY OF LA QUINTA MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL FROM: PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 18, 1994 CASE NO.: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 93-039 SUBJECT: AMEND TITLE 9, PLANNING AND ZONING OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE REGARDING MINIMUM HOUSE SIZE AND COMPATIBILITY WITH RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISIONS ISSUE: To establish minimum house size and compatibility standards for the City. BACKGROUND On October 9, 1993, the City Council directed staff to prepare a report regarding house size and compatibility standards within 60-days. During this process, staff reviewed the current ordinance and found that it lacked the necessary regulations to address these issues. Staff then drafted language establishing the minimum square footage for a single family house and developed a review process to be used when a developer wants to change the architectural style of any new housing within an existing tract. The City Council reviewed the draft regulations at its meeting of November 16, 1993. The general comments suggested that the proposed 1300 square foot house minimum was not large enough. It was suggested that 1400 square feet be used or perhaps a formula of a percent of minimum house size to lot would be more appropriate. The Planning Commission considered the draft regulations on December 14th and 28th, 1993. The Commission listened to public testimony and received written correspondence on the draft regulations. The Commission made changes to the original draft which are reflected in Attachment 1 dated December 28, 1993, attached. ANALYSISTISCAL IMPACT: Various individuals or organizations have responded to the Compatibility Ordinance. Copies of the correspondence are included with this report. The following is a summary of the major changes recommended by the Planning Commission, and written or oral comments submitted on the major issues of the regulations. Attachment 1 contains all the changes recommended by the Planning Commission. 0 00 351, MEMOJH.342 2 Single Family Dwelling Unit Development Standards A. Minimum house size - (proposed) Minimum gross livable area shall be 4-,400 1.300 square feet, excluding the garage, as measured from the exterior walls of the dwelling. STAMKO - 1,200 square feet or consider establishing a 1,400 square foot minimum allowing no more than 25 % of an "R-1 zoned project" to have residential houses in the range from 1,100 to 1,400 square feet." North La Quinta Residents (NLQR) - 1,500 square feet Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher - 750 square feet (current code) Building Industry Association (BIA) - 1,200 square feet B. Landscaping - (proposed) The front yard of all lots, and in addition, the side yard of corner lots, shall be landscaped to property line per the requirements of the development standards of the Zoning District. BIA - "This is a new requirement, not contained in the existing SR zone. The development standards of the Zoning District are not now defined. This is not a customary requirement in cities throughout the valley, and will add cost to the overall cost of building a house. We prefer to have a landscaping construction standard of specification developed much as existing standards for curbs or other construction items. " N.L.Q. residents - Landscaping: the front yard of all lots, and in addition, the side yard of corner lots, shall be landscaped to property line per the requirements of the development standards of the Zoning District, and at least 2 specimen (24" box) trees shall be provided in the front yard in addition to the landscape requirements of the zone. (refer to L.Q.M.C. § 9.204.010)" C. Screening - (proposed) Refuse container areas and permanently mounted bottled gas tanks shall be concealed by landscaping or block/masonry walls. BIA - "Carried over from the SR Zone, but modified. Current SR requirement reads ...shall be concealed by landscaping or other means. We feel the language change is uncalled for and simply adds unnecessary cost. " D. Fencing - (proposed) Refer to the fencing requirements contained in the Development Standards of the underlying Zoning District. BIA - "This is a new requirement. The development standards section says ...'the developer must provide the same type of fencing including perimeter subdivision fencing'. This says no change in the type of fencing previously provided. 00P360 MEMOJH.342 3 Perhaps this ought to address only those fences that are visible from the street. If in an existing development concrete block walls were provided, then the requirement could be that those walls that are visible from the street shall be of the same material, but would not make that requirement between houses when not visible from the street. The cost ramifications are significant, amounting on average to several thousand dollars per house." N. L. Q. Residents - "Wood fencing and/or gates shall not be permitted in newly constructed homes and subdivisions." E. Single Family DwellingUnit nit Approval Process - (proposed) One of the following methods shall be used to review new single family dwelling unit proposals prior to the issuance of a building permit. The precise plan process (Section 9.42.110) shall be used for single family dwelling units proposed for construction on a lot within the City unless the compatibility review process is required. 2. The compatibility review process (Section __) shall be used for any single family dwelling unit proposed for construction within a subdivision or any partially built -out phases within a subdivision recorded after May 1, 1982, where the units proposed are classified as a major design deviation from the previously approved units. BIA - "This is a new requirement. As written, it would appear that all single family dwelling unit proposals, prior to the issuance of a building permit, must undergo a new review process, even if those buildings have received prior approval and even if no change is proposed. Why?" F. Development Standards for Compatibility Review Process - (proposed) The units shall only be approved when they comply with the following standards: 1. A two story house cannot be constructed adjacent to or abutting a lot line of an existing single story home constructed in a prior phase of the same subdivision, unless proof can be provided showing that a two story unit was proposed for the lot by the prior builder. BIA - "What if the previous builder of approved development provided for one and two story houses?" 2. If lot fencing has been provided in the subdivision, the developer must provide the same, or better, type of fencing including perimeter subdivision fencing. 000361 MEMOJH.342 4 BIA - "As indicated above, recommend this be limited to that fencing that is visible from the street. Also, fencing should be allowed to be upgraded from the original approval without further hearings by the City." BIA - "As indicated in the cover letter, this requirement is a direct reversal of the existing SR ordinance, section 9.42.080 says: 3. A proposed single family dwelling unit must eentain sifflilaf be compatible in terms of: a. architectural material such as roof material, window treatment and garage door style b. Colors C. Roof lines with the existing units, or units which are approved for construction as determined on the plans and materials board, within the same subdivision unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. BIA - "As indicated in the cover letter, this requirement is a direct reversal of the existing SR ordinance, section 9.42.080 says: `Architectural Variety. When houses using similar architectural styles are located with(in) two hundred fifty feet of each other, exterior building elevations shall make provision for architectural variety by using different colors, styles, roof treatments, window treatments, garage door treatments, and similar methods.' We feel the current policy of encouraging architectural difference is appropriate. If this is such a good idea, why might it not be applied in neighborhoods that have been developed for the construction of custom homes/ Do you really want an entire neighborhood to be the same?" 4. At least one specimen (24'-box) tree shall be provided in the front or street side yard in addition to as part of the landscape requirements of the zone. BIA - "This was never discussed by our committee. It adds approximately $50 to the cost of a house, depending on the type of tree installed. This appears to be an arbitrary requirement suggested by staff and seems to us unnecessary. N. L. Q. Residents - "Two 24" box specimen trees shall be provided in addition to the landscape requirements of the zone." Mr. Eldred - "I believe it should provide, at least within the compatibility transition zone defined in section 5, that the visible front yard, and any street visible side yard landscaping be consistent as to types of allowed landscaping MEMOJH.342 000364 5 5. materials and specific planting standards or requirements established within the previously constructed portion of the tract, so that any higher standards established would be continued at least through the transition zone." I . ......... .... - -- ---- - - r is 1,250 squ- feet, then the smallest unit that eetild be eenstHeted is !,-250 The smallest single family dwelling units proposed within a partially developed subdivision may deviate in size so that the proposed units are no more than 10% smaller in size than the smallest previously built unit in the subdivision. BIA - 10% is too small (paraphrased) Mr. Eldred - "Contains a mathematical error, the deviation with respect to the 1,350 square foot house would create a range from 1,080 feet to 1,620, not from 1,300 to 1,620. Further I believe that a deviation of 20% or even 25% from the average, mid -point or medium range of the previously constructed homes would be appropriate. A suggested range of homes up to 20% smaller than the smallest existing unit through 20% larger than the largest unit creates an excessively large allowed deviation that would not appear to represent consistency nor compatibility. If the deviation is to be measured from the extremes of the existing constructed range rather than from the median or mid -point, then I believe that the allowed deviation should be no more than 10% smaller than the smallest existing structure with perhaps a larger maximum deviation from the largest structure allowed." N. L. Q. residents - "The single family dwelling units proposed cannot deviate by more than 10% from the square footage of the existing units in the first phase of the a subdivision In addition garage conversions shall not be included when calculating a dwelling unit's square footage." 6. The Planning Commission when approving compatibility units may limit the type and the number of a particular unit to be constructed within the subdivision. BIA -"This item is new, was never discussed in the committee meetings of the Compatibility committee and we feel is entirely inappropriate. We feel that the City and/or its representatives, staff or elected/appointed commissions is not qualified to make marketing decisions as to which products any merchant in the city ought to offering at their place of business. Further, should the City put itself in the position to dictate product, we feel there may be some economic liability that the City will assume. Is that really a position the City wants to put itself in?" MEMOJH.342 000363 6 N. L. Q. residents - The Commission when approving compatibility units may limit the type and the number of a particular unit to be constructed within the subdivision. In no case shall the smallest proposed unit exceed 20% of the total number of proposed units for the subdivision." G. Staff Comments: The Development Standards for the Compatibility Review Process limits the smallest unit to a ten percent deviation from the smallest unit constructed. However, Regulation #7 states that, ' All single family dwelling units proposed must comply with the requirementscontained in the Development Standard Section...". Therefore the smallest house permitted under any circumstances is 1,300 ware feet. 2. The review process still includes the Design Review Board, based upon Council action, any reference to the Board will be removed. 3. The review process requires a public hearing before the Planning Commission for the major design deviations. An appeal may be filed to the City Council. 4. The recommended fees (Attachment 2) have been established based upon an examination of the labor, material, and equipment costs required to provide each service. These costs analysis were performed in order to achieve six major goals: a. To establish an equitable basis for costing services. b. To accommodate special requests for services, while ensuring that the public -at -large does not incur the cost. C. To provide for reasonable cost recovery in providing these services. d. To ensure that fees do not exceed the cost of providing services. e. To provide a single source for service fee information. The fees identified do not address services that are provided in order to meet community -wide needs. In such circumstances, the use of general City resources is appropriate. For the fees recommended, specific beneficiaries can be identified. By establishing fees designed to achieve reasonable cost recovery, these services can be provided, but only after ensuring that the public -at -large is not subsidizing them. The current recommended fee represents approximately 70% of the cost associates with processing the application (see attached). 5. In addition, on December 28th, the BIA requested the formation of a Special Study Group to consist of two Council members, two Planning Commission members, two City staff, two homeowners, and two BIA members. The study group would meet to give direction to the City staff to modify the draft to reflect information generated through this group (refer to BIA letter dated 12-22-93). The Planning Commission determined that this was the sole responsibility of the City Council and they had no authority to create such a group. 000364 MEMOJH.342 7 OPTIONS The alternatives available to City Council are: 1. Accept the recommendation of the Planning Commission and adopt the Ordinance; or 2. Modify the recommendation of the Planning Commission and adopt the modified ordinance; or 3. Refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for further review; or 4. Continue the matter at the Council level for further information; or 5. Form a study group as recommended by BIA RECOMMENDATION: 1. Move to take up Ordinance by title and number only and waive further reading. 2. Move to introduce Ordinance on first reading. 3. Move to adopt Resolution 94- , establishing fees for the Compatibility Review process. Attachments: 1. Planning Commission recommendation 2. Appeal fee worksheet 3. Various written correspondence 00036 MEMOJH.342 8 ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 9 OF THE LA QUINTA MUNICIPAL CODE BY AMENDING THE MINIMUM HOUSE SIZE AND CREATING COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS THROUGHOUT THE CITY AND CONFIGURATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION CASE NO.: ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 93-039 The City Council of La Quinta does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. The first paragraph of Sections 9.32.020 and Section 9.52.030 of the La Quinta Municipal Code each of which shall be amended to read as follows: All single family unit developments, regardless of zoning district, must comply with the following Standards. (Except that senior citizen and/or affordable housing developments/subdivisions are permitted deviations from the following requirements, provided that, 1) the overall density of the development/subdivision does not exceed the density (plus any bonuses) as designated by the General Plan Land Use diagram; and, 2) the senior citizen and/or affordable housing development/subdivision is reviewed by the conditional use permit process. The deviations from the standards can only be granted through the conditional use permit process.) SECTION 2. Amend Sections 9.32.020 and Section 9.52.030 of the La Quinta Municipal Code to add the following: H. Minimum gross livable area shall be 1,300 square feet, excluding the garage, as measured from the exterior walls of the dwelling. I. Bedroom dimensions: a minimum bedroom size of 100 square feet, as measured from the interior walls of the room. J. Bathrooms: there shall not be less than one and one-half baths in one or two bedroom dwellings, and not less than one and three-quarter baths in dwellings with three or more bedrooms. K. Garage dimensions: each dwelling shall have a two -car garage with interior dimensions not less than twenty feet square (20' X 20'), which space shall remain clear of mechanical equipment, appliances, or other improvements which conflict with its purpose to store vehicles. An additional four feet shall be provided to the width or depth if mechanical equipment or appliances, including but not limited to washer, dryer, and forced air unit, are contained within the garage interior. A water heater is permitted without additional interior garage area being required provided that it is located so as not to conflict with vehicular parking or pedestrian access. 000366 ORDDRFT.043 9 ordinance L. Access between house and garage: a separate pedestrian door into the garage shall be provided as either an interconnecting door providing direct access between the dwelling and garage, or a pedestrian door leading outside to a paved walkway which provides direct access to a keyed entry into the dwelling. M. Mechanical and related equipment: when ground -mounted, heating and cooling mechanical equipment shall be screened from all sides. When equipment is located on pitched roofs or flat roofs wells and/or screening must be provided on all sides. The screening must be an integral part of the architectural design of the house. N. Landscaping: the front yard of all lots, and in addition, the side yard of corner lots, shall be landscaped to property line per the requirements of the development standards of the Zoning District. O. Screening: refuse container areas and permanently mounted bottled gas tanks shall be concealed by landscaping or block/masonry walls. P. Underground utilities: all electric services, overhead wires, or associated structures must be installed underground from the service pole (if any) to the new residence. Q. Driveway materials: the driveway shall be surfaced with concrete and constructed in accordance with City standards. R. Lighting: all exterior lighting shall be located and directed so as not to shine directly on adjacent properties or otherwise create a nuisance (see Chapter 9.210). S. Fencing: refer to the fencing requirements contained in the Development Standards of the underlying Zoning District. SECTION 3. There is hereby added to the La Quinta Municipal Code the following new Sections 9.32.025 and Section 9.52.031 each of which are to read as follows: Single Fames Dwelling Unit Approval Process: One of the following methods shall be used to review single family dwelling unit proposal prior to the issuance of a building permit. A. The precise plan process (Section 9.42.110) shall be used for single family dwelling units proposed for construction on a lot within the City unless the compatibility review process is required. B. The compatibility review process (Chapter 9.25) shall be used for any single family dwelling unit proposed for construction within a subdivision or any partially built -out phases within a subdivision recorded after May 1, 1982, where the units proposed are classified as a major design deviation from the previously approved units. 00036? 10 ORDDRFT.043 Ordinance SECTION 4. There is hereby added to the La Quinta Municipal Code the following new Sections 9.32.027 and 9.52.033 each of which are to read as follows: Minor and Major Design Deviation: The Planning and Development Department shall make the determination of whether a design deviation is major or minor using the following criteria: A. A minor design deviation can be approved by the Planning and Development Department without a public hearing using the precise plan process (Section 9.42.110). Minor design deviation means a modification of an approved architectural unit within a subdivision that involves items such as, but not limited to, less than five percent (5 %) change in square footage of existing constructed or approved units; columns, dormer vents, window size changes, plant -on locations, color, and stucco texture changes. The Planning and Development Director may refer the minor design deviation to the Planning Commission for a non -hearing compatibility review. B. A major design deviation is subject to the review and approval process of Chapter 9.25 Compatibility Review Process. A major design deviation means, a five percent (5 %) or more change in square footage of existing constructed or approved units; any exterior architectural modification not defined as a minor design deviation. SECTION 5. There is hereby added to the La Quinta Municipal Code the following new Sections 9.44.027, 9.48.027 and 9.50.027 each of which are to read as follows: A. Development Standards 1. Minimum gross livable area shall be 1,300 square feet, excluding the garage, as measured from the exterior walls of the dwelling. 2. Bedroom dimensions: a minimum bedroom size of 100 square feet, as measured from the interior walls of the room. 3. Bathrooms: there shall not be less than one and one-half baths in one or two bedroom dwellings, and not less than one and three-quarter baths in dwellings with three or more bedrooms. 4. Garage dimensions: each dwelling shall have a two -car garage with interior dimensions not less than twenty feet square (20' X 20'), which space shall remain clear of mechanical equipment, appliances, or other improvements which conflict with its purpose to store vehicles. An additional four feet shall be provided to the width or depth if mechanical ORDDRFT.043 11 Ordinance equipment or appliances, including but not limited to washer, dryer, and forced air unit, are contained within the garage interior. A water heater is permitted without additional interior garage area being required provided that it is located so as not to conflict with vehicular parking or pedestrian access. 5. Access between house and garage: a separate pedestrian door into the garage shall be provided as either an interconnecting door providing direct access between the dwelling and garage, or a pedestrian door leading outside to a paved walkway which provides direct access to a keyed entry into the dwelling. 6. Mechanical and related equipment: when ground -mounted, heating and cooling mechanical equipment shall be screened from all sides. When equipment is located on pitched roofs or flat roofs wells and/or screening must be provided on all sides. The screening must be an integral part of the architectural design of the house. 7. Landscaping: the front yard of all lots, and in addition, the side yard of corner lots, shall be landscaped to property line per the requirements of the development standards of the Zoning District. 8. Screening: refuse container areas and permanently mounted bottled gas tanks shall be concealed by landscaping or block/masonry walls. 9. Underground utilities: all electric services, overhead wires, or associated structures must be installed underground from the service pole (if any) to the new residence. 10. Driveway materials: the driveway shall be surfaced with concrete and constructed in accordance with City standards. 11. Lighting: all exterior lighting shall be located and directed so as not to shine directly on adjacent properties or otherwise create a nuisance (see Chapter 9.210). 12. Fencing: refer to the fencing requirements contained in the Development Standards of the underlying Zoning District. B. Approval Process: One of the following methods shall be used to review single family dwelling unit proposals prior to the issuance of a building permit. 1. The precise plan process (Section 9.42.110) shall be used for single family dwelling units proposed for construction on a lot within the City unless the compatibility review process is required. 000369 ORDDRFT.043 12 ordinance 2. The compatibility review process (Chapter 9.25) shall be used for any single family dwelling unit proposed for construction within a subdivision or any partially built -out phases within a subdivision recorded after May 19 1982, where the units proposed are classified as a major design deviation from the previously approved units. C. Minor and Major Design Deviation: The Planning and Development Department shall make the determination of whether a design deviation is major or minor using the following criteria: A minor design deviation can be approved by the Planning and Development Department without a public hearing using the precise plan process (Section 9.42.110). Minor design deviation means a modification of an approved architectural unit within a subdivision that involves items such as, but not limited to, less than five percent (5 %) change in square footage of existing constructed or approved units; columns, dormer vents, window size changes, plant -on locations, color, and stucco texture changes. The Planning and Development Director may refer the minor design deviation to the Planning Commission for a non -hearing compatibility review. 2. A major design deviation is subject to the review and approval process of Chapter 9.25 Compatibility Review Process. A major design deviation means, a five percent (5 %) or more change in square footage of existing constructed or approved units; any exterior architectural modification not defined as a minor design deviation. SECTION 6. There is hereby added to the La Quinta Municipal Code Chapter 9.25 which is to read as follows: Sections: 9.25.010 9.25.020 9.25.030 9.25.040 9.25.050 9.25.060 9.25.070 9.25.080 CHAPTER 9.25 Compatibility Review Process Compatibility Review Process for Major Design Deviations Completeness of Application Development Standards for Compatibility Review Process Review by the Design Review Board Planning Commission Review Public Hearing Process Appeal Process Fees 00037 0 ORDDRFT.043 13 ordinance SECTION 9.25.010. COMPATIBILITY REVIEW PROCESS FOR MAJOR DESIGN DEVIATIONS. The completed application along with the following information shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department for major deviations. One copy of the preliminary title report or deed of trust to the subject property. 2. Eighteen (18) sets of the site development plan (number as required by the Planning and Development Department), each set to incorporate the following: a. Dimensioned floor plan(s) relating to all building layout aspects, showing bedrooms, kitchens, hallways, baths, etc. b. Four -point elevations of the units proposed, delineating architectural feature(s), and listing proposed building materials, finishes, colors, etc. C. A detailed site plan delineating all siting aspects of the development (i.e., setbacks, topography, fencing locations, locations provided for mechanical and heating/air conditioning systems, parking, accessways, adjacent streets, utilities, and drainage. d. A conceptual landscaping plan, showing a listing of quantities, species, location and plant sizes to be incorporated into the final landscaping of the project. The final approved landscape plan must be stamped "approved" by the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's office prior to final inspection. e. When new units are proposed adjacent to existing unit(s) show, in detail, the architectural relationship of the existing and proposed unit(s). This may be done with photos, new elevations, etc. 3. Two sets of all plans reduced to eight and one half inches by eleven inches, and submitted on other similar format suitable for presentation. 4. One eight inch by thirteen inch (8" X 13")color, material and finish sample board for the unit's exterior areas, including, but not limited to, roof covering, facia boards, tile inlays, stucco finish, wood or other plant -on materials, etc. Colors and materials shall be keyed to at least one set of architectural elevations. 5. One colored elevation of all sides of the unit oriented to public view, in accordance with the materials sample board submitted. 6. Any other additional information as may be required. SECTION 9.25.020. COMPLETENESS OF APPLICATION. No residential application shall be processed until all information as required by this chapter has been submitted. Determination of completeness shall be in accordance with the provisions of the California Government Code 65943 or successor provisions. 000371 ORDDRFT.043 14 Ordinance SECTION 9.25.030. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMPATIBILITY REVIEW PROCESS. The units shall only be approved when they comply with the following standards: 1. The proposed use conforms to all the provisions of the General Plan and specific plans, and with all applicable requirements of State law and the ordinances of the City. 2. A two story house cannot be constructed adjacent to or abutting a lot line of an existing single story home constructed in a prior phase of the same subdivision, unless proof can be provided showing that a two story unit was proposed for the lot by the prior builder. 3. If lot fencing has been provided in the subdivision, the developer must provide the same, or better, type of fencing including perimeter subdivision fencing. 4. A proposed single family dwelling unit must be compatible in terms of: a. Architectural material such as roof material, window treatment and garage door style b. Colors C. Roof lines as the existing units, or units which are approved for construction as determined on the plans and materials board, within the same subdivision unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. 6. At least one specimen tree shall be provided in the front or street side yard as part of the landscape requirements of the zone. 7. All single family dwelling units proposed must comply with the requirements contained in the Development Standards Section of the applicable zone. 8. The smallest single family dwelling units proposed within a partially developed subdivision may deviate in size so that the proposed units are no more than 10% smaller in size than the smallest previously built unit in the subdivision. 9. The Planning Commission when approving compatibility units may limit the type and the number of a particular unit to be constructed within the subdivision. SECTION 9.25.040. REVIEW BY THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The Design Review Board shall review all proposed units and make a recommendation to the Planning Commission. The Design Review Board shall take one of the following actions during their review: 000372) ORDDRFT.043 15 Ordinance 1. Recommend approval as submitted. 2. Recommend modification. 3. Refer to the Planning Commission without a recommendation. The request before the Design Review Board is a non -hearing item, however, public comment can be taken at the discretion of the Board from the applicant or interested parties. SECTION 9.25.050. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW All residential units shall be approved, conditionally approved, or disapproved by action of the Planning Commission, based upon the standards referred to in Section 9.25.030 of this Chapter and the recommendation of the Design Review Board. The following findings must be made when an application is approved: The architectural aspects of the development will be compatible with and not detrimental to other existing units in the subdivision. 2. Applicable development standards including, but not limited to, setbacks, parking, landscaping, site design, and similar features, will be compatible with and not detrimental to, other existing units in the subdivision. SECTION 9.25.060. PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS. The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on all applications. Notice of the time, date, and place of the public hearing shall be given at least ten calendar days prior to the hearing by the following procedures: 1. Mailing to all owners of real property which is located within three hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the parcel, lot, subdivision phase to be considered as such owners are shown on the last equalized assessment roll. 2. Publication once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. 3. The Planning Director may require that additional notice be given by enlarging the notification radius. SECTION 9.25.070. APPEAL PROCESS The applicant or any other aggrieved party may appeal the decision of the Planning Commission by the following procedure: Appeal to the City Council within ten calendar days after the date of the Planning Commission's decision, the applicant or aggrieved party may appeal the decision, in writing, to the City Council on the forms provided by the Planning and Development Department. Upon receipt of a completed appeal, the City Clerk shall set the matter for hearing before the City Council not less than five calendar days nor more than thirty calendar days thereafter, and shall give written notice of the hearing in the same manner ORDDRFT.043 0 00 3 7 316 ordinance that notice was given for the Planning Commission hearing. City Council shall render its decision within thirty calendar days following the close of the hearing on the appeal. SECTION 9.25.080. FEES The application and appeal fees shall be established by Council resolution. SECTION 7. The Amendments have complied with the requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970" (County of Riverside, Resolution 82-213, adopted by the City of La Quinta Ordinance 5), in that the Planning Director conducted an Initial Study and has determined that the proposed amendments will not have a significant adverse impact on the environment and a Negative Declaration is hereby adopted. SECTION 8. Upon the effective date of this Ordinance, Council Ordinance 240 shall be suspended and have no effect. SECTION 9. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 10. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this Ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this Ordinance; and shall cause this Ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on this day of 1993, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN J. PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ORDDRFT.043 0 0 0 374 17 Ordinance ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. 1UHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 37? ORDDRFT.043 18 RESOLUTION 94- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING FEES RELATING TO COMPATIBILITY REVIEW AND PRECISE PLAN APPLICATIONS AND APPEAL FEES WHEREAS, the State Government Code provides that fees may be collected to cover the cost of administering permits, plan review and inspection activities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the La Quinta City Council does hereby resolve that fees shall be established for compatibility review and precise plan applications and appeal fees, to read as contained in Exhibit "A", attached hereto. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED at a regular meeting of the La Quinta City Council held on this 18th day of January, 1994, by the following vote to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California RESOCC-129 009376 19 Resolution 94- COMPATIBILITY REVIEW FEES Compatibility Review Application $835.00 Precise Plan Application (per unit) $ 25.00 Appeals Applicant or aggrieved party. $300.00 99,g377 RESOCC.129 20 ATTACHMENT # 1 Recommended by Planning Commission EXHIBIT "A" December 28, 1993 APPROVAL PROCESS ZONING ORDINANCE AMENDMENT 93-039 TO BE ADDED TO THE R-1, R-2, R-2a R-3, R-V ZONES Single Family Dwelling Unit Development Standards All single family unit developments, regardless of zoning district, must comply with Compatibility Development Standards if units have been constructed within the subdivision. Except that senior citizen and/or affordable housing developments/subdivisions are permitted deviations from the following requirements, provided that 1) the overall density of the development/subdivision does not exceed the density (plus any bonuses) as designated by the General Plan Land Use diagram; and, 2) the senior citizen and/or affordable housing development/subdivision is reviewed by the conditional use permit process. The deviations from the standards can only be granted through the conditional use permit process. 1. Minimum gross livable area shall be 4400 1.300 square feet, excluding the garage, as measured from the exterior walls of the dwelling. 2. Bedroom dimensions: a minimum of ten feet eleaf width and depth difnensiefis bedroom size of 100 square feet, as measured from the interior walls of the room. 3. Bathrooms: there shall not be less than one and one-half baths in one or two bedroom dwellings, and not less than one and three-quarter baths in dwellings with three or more bedrooms. 4. Garage dimensions: each dwelling shall have a two -car garage with interior dimensions not less than twenty feet square (20' X 20'), which space shall remain clear of mechanical equipment, appliances, or other improvements which conflict with its purpose to store vehicles. An additional four feet shall be provided to the width or depth if mechanical equipment or appliances, including but not limited to washer, dryer, and forced air unit, are contained within the garage interior. A water heater is permitted without additional interior garage area being required provided that it is located so as not to conflict with vehicular parking or pedestrian access. 5. Access between house and garage: a separate pedestrian door into the garage shall be provided as either an interconnecting door providing direct access between the dwelling and garage, or a pedestrian door leading outside to a paved walkway which provides direct access to a keyed entry into the dwelling. 090378 DOCJH.092 21 6. Mechanical and related equipment: when ,ground -mounted, heating and cooling mechanical equipment shall be gFound meunted and screened from all sides. When equipment wells is located on pitched roofs and or Corr flat roofs wells and/or screening must be provided on all sides must be sefeen The screening must be an integral part of the architectural design of the house. ON 11111 AWN 11 8. Landscaping: the front yard of all lots, and in addition, the side yard of corner lots, shall be landscaped to property line per the requirements of the development standards of the Zoning District. 9. Screening: refuse container areas and permanently mounted bottled gas tanks shall be concealed by landscaping or block/masonry walls. 10. Underground utilities: all electric services, overhead wires, or associated structures must be installed underground from the service pole (if any) to the new residence. 11. Driveway materials: the driveway shall be surfaced with concrete and constructed in accordance with City standards. 12. Lighting: all exterior lighting shall be located and directed so as not to shine directly on adjacent properties or otherwise create a nuisance (see Chapter 9.210). 13. Fencing: refer to the fencing requirements contained in the Development Standards of the underlying Zoning District. IMP -rr_ . ...... Ild Single Family Dwelling Unit Approval Process One of the following methods shall be used to review new single family dwelling unit proposals prior to the issuance of a building permit. DOCJH.092 22 000379 1. The precise plan process (Section 9.42.110) shall be used for single family dwelling units proposed for construction on a lot within the City unless the compatibility review process is required. , ter. 2. The compatibility review process (Section ___) shall be used for any single family dwelling unit proposed for construction within a subdivision or any partially built -out phases within a subdivision recorded after May 1, 1982, where the units proposed are classified as a major design deviation from the previously approved units. Minor and Major Design Deviation The Planning and Development Department shall make the determination of whether a design deviation is major or minor using the following criteria: 1. A minor design deviation can be approved by the Planning and Development Department without a public hearing using the precise plan process (Section 9.42.110). Minor design deviation means a modification of an approved architectural unit within a subdivision that involves items such as, but not limited to, less than five percent (5 %) change in square footage of existing constructed or approved units; columns, dormer vents, window size changes, plant -on locations, color, and stucco texture changes. The Planning and Development Director may refer the minor design deviation to the Planning Commission for a non -hearing compatibility review. 2. A major design deviation is subject to the review and approval process of Section Compatibility Review Process. A major design deviation means, a five percent (5%) or more change in square footage of existing constructed or approved units; any exterior architectural modification not defined as a minor design deviation. DOCJH.092 23 000380 A NEW CHAPTER WOULD BE CREATED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE Compatibility Review Process The completed application along with the following information shall be submitted to the Planning and Development Department. 1. One copy of the preliminary title report or deed of trust to the subject property. 2. Eighteen (18) sets of the site development plan (number as required by the Planning and Development Department), each set to incorporate the following: a. Dimensioned floor plan(s) relating to all building layout aspects, showing bedrooms, kitchens, hallways, baths, etc. b. Four -point elevations of the units proposed, delineating architectural feature(s), and listing proposed building materials, finishes, colors, etc. C. A detailed site plan delineating all siting aspects of the development (i.e., setbacks, topography, fencing locations, locations provided for gfetind fneented mechanical and heating/air conditioning systems, parking, accessways, adjacent streets, utilities, and drainage. d. A conceptual site landscaping plan, showing a listing of quantities, species, location and plant sizes to be incorporated into the final landscaping of the project. The final approved landscape plan must be stamped "approved" by the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's office prior to the issu nee of building germ final insW tion. e. When new units are proposed adjacent to existing unit(s) show, with eReuglt in detail, the architectural relationship of the existing and proposed unit(s). This may be done with photos, new elevations, etc. 3. Two sets of all plans reduced to eight and one half inches by eleven inches, and submitted on other similar format suitable for presentation. 4. One eight inch by thirteen inch (8" X 13")color, material and finish sample board for the unit's exterior areas, including, but not limited to, roof covering, facia boards, tile inlays, stucco finish, wood or other plant -on materials, etc. Colors and materials shall be keyed to at least one set of architectural elevations. 5. One colored elevation of all sides of the unit oriented to public view, in accordance with the materials sample board submitted. 6. Any other additional information as may be required. DOCJH.092 24 009381 Completeness of Application No residential application shall be processed until all information as required by this chapter has been submitted. Determination of completeness shall be in accordance with the provisions of the California Government Code 65943 or successor provisions. Development Standards for Compatibility Review Process The units shall only be approved when they comply with the following standards: The proposed use conforms to all the provisions of the General Plan and specific plans, and with all applicable requirements of State law and the ordinances of the City. 2. A two story house cannot be constructed adjacent to or abutting a lot line of an existing single story home constructed in a prior phase of the same subdivision, unless proof can be provided showing that a two story unit was proposed for the lot by the prior builder. 3. If lot fencing has been provided in the subdivision, the developer must provide the same, or better, type of fencing including perimeter subdivision fencing. 5. A proposed single family dwelling unit must eentain simila be compatible in terms of: a. architectural material such as roof material, window treatment and garage door style b. Colors C. Roof lines with the existing units, or units which are approved for construction as determined on the plans and materials board, within the same subdivision unless otherwise approved by the Planning Commission. 6. At least one specimen (24" Hex) tree shall be provided in the front or street side yard in addi ien-te as tart of the landscape requirements of the zone. 7. All single family dwelling units proposed must comply with the requirements contained in the Development Standards Section DOCJH.092 25 00038^ --NIMMULLUS ALMLAAMILLU- 11 01 I WI The smallest single family dwelling units proposed within a partially developed subdivision may deviate in size so that the proposed units are no more than 10% smaller in size than the smallest previously built unit in the subdivision. 9. The Planning Commission when approving compatibility units may limit the type and the number of a particular unit to be constructed within the subdivision. REVIEW BY THE DESIGN REVIEW BOARD The Design Review Board shall review all proposed units and make a recommendation to the Planning Commission. The Design Review Board shall take one of the following actions during their review: 1. Recommend approval as submitted. 2. Recommend modification. 3. Refer to the Planning Commission without a recommendation. The request before the Design Review Board is a non -hearing item, however, public comment can be taken at the discretion of the Board from the applicant or interested parties. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW All residential units shall be approved, conditionally approved, or disapproved by action of the Planning Commission, based upon the standards referred to in Section of this Chapter and the recommendation of the Design Review Board. The following findings must be made when an application is approved: The architectural aspects of the development will be compatible with and not detrimental to other existing units in the subdivision. 2. Applicable development standards including, but not limited to, setbacks, parking, landscaping, site design, and similar features, will be compatible with and not detrimental to, other existing units in the subdivision. DOCJH.092 26 009383 PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on all applications. Notice of the time, date, and place of the public hearing shall be given at least ten calendar days prior to the hearing by the following procedures: 1. Mailing to all owners of real property which is located within three hundred feet of the exterior boundaries of the parcel, lot, subdivision phase to be considered as such owners are shown on the last equalized assessment roll. 2. Publication once in a newspaper of general circulation in the City. 3. The Planning Director may require that additional notice be given by enlarging the notification radius. APPEAL PROCESS The applicant or any other aggrieved party may appeal the decision of the Planning Commission by the following procedure: Appeal to the City Council within ten calendar days after the date of the Planning Commission's decision, the applicant or aggrieved party may appeal the decision, in writing, to the City Council on the forms provided by the Planning and Development Department. Upon receipt of a completed appeal, the City Clerk shall set the matter for hearing before the City Council not less than five calendar days nor more than thirty calendar days thereafter, and shall give written notice of the hearing in the same manner that notice was given for the Planning Commission hearing. City Council shall render its decision within thirty calendar days following the close of the hearing on the appeal. FEES The application and appeal fees shall be established by Council resolution. DOCJH.092 27 000384 PROPOSED FEES Compatibility Review Application $835.00 Precise Plan Application (per unit) $ 25.00 Appeals Applicant or aggrieved party. $300•00 28 DOCJH.092 000385 ATTACHMENT #2 COMPATIBILITY REVIEW APPLICATION FEE COSTS STAFF TIME (HOURS) Staff Activity City Personnel Planning Principal Associate Department Clerk Manager Budget/ Director Planner Planner Secretary Typist Manager Accept application .25 Review application 1.00 for completeness .25 Set up file Research 3.00 Development 2.00 2.00 1.00 Review meeting Preparation of .50 1.00 .50 1.00 4.50 2.00 1.00 staff report Legal publication .25 .50 and posting Notification of .50 1.50 adjacent property owners Mailing agendas & 1.00 1.00 1.00 packets Public hearing 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Planning Commission Action letter/close .50 .25 file TOTAL TIME .50 1.00 2.50 4.00 15.25 5.50 4.25 Expenses Incurred: 1. Staff report copies and mailing of notices: $ 26.00 2. Legal publication $100.00 3. Staff time $710.04 Recommended Fee: TOTAL $836.04 $835.00 DOCJH.093 oor3ss a APPEAL FEE COSTS STAFF TIME (HOURS) Staff Activity City Personnel Planning Principal Associate Department Clerk Manager Budget/ Director Planner Planner Secretary Typist Manager Accept .25 application Research 2.00 Preparation of .50 1.00 1.00 .50 1.00 1.00 .50 staff report Notification of .50 adjacent property owners Legal publication 25 .50 and posting Public hearing 1.00 1.00 1.00 Follow up/close .50 .25 file TOTAL TIME .50 1.00 2.00 1.75 4.75 1.25 1 1.50 Expenses Incurred: 1. Staff report copies and mailing of notices: 2. Legal publication 3. Staff time TOTAL Recommended Fee: $ 18.25 $100.00 $311.12 $429.37 $300.00 (about 70% of the cost) DOCJH.093 000387 30 Exhibit "A" Proposal 110 Minimum gross liveable area shall be 1.300 square feet..... Response: The minimum square footage currently allowed in the various ,. ;�-pojitical subdivisions in the Coachella Valley is 4s fol- lows: r Desert Hot Springs Palm Springs Cathedral City Rancho Mirage Palm Desert Indian Wells La Quinta Indio Coachella Riverside County 1200 1000 1100 1400 1000 Varies with lot size 2000 750 (R1), 1200 (SR) 1100 1050 750 The purpose of this proposal would seem to be to exclude more affordable homes and is generally against State and Federal policy. A 1200 square foot minimum would seem more 'appropriate, is consistent with the current SR,ZoneFrequi�Ys- went and would be in keeping with the policies of the major- ity of other cities in the valley. This topic was discussed during the meetings of the Council appointed study group, however, the recommendation by staff appears to somewhat arbitrary. We object strongly to this recommendation. Although exempted by virtue of being classified as "afford- able housing", the proposed sizes of the soon -to -be built "affordable" houses directly across the street from the La Quint& city hall would not meet this requirement. Proposals 12 through S. These are carried over directly from the existing SR Zoning requirements. We have no objection. 000388 51 Proposal 1 6. .**..heating and cooling mechanical equipment shall.be ' ground -mounted and screened from all sides. • Response: The current SR Zone has this provision but states "....shall be ground -mounted or completely screened from all sides". This change disallows roof mounted units, whether or not they are screened. We feel this is language change is uncalled for. Proposal f 7. This is carried over directly from the existing SR Zoning requirements. We have no objection. Proposal I S. Landscaping....shall be landscaped.... per the requirements of the development standards of the Zoning District. Response: This is a new requirement, not contained in the existing SR Zone. The development standards of the Zoning District are not now defined. This is not a customary requirement in cities throughout the valley, and will add cost to the over- all cost of building a house. We prefer to have a landscap- ing construction standard or specification developed such as existing standards for curbs or other construction items. Proposal 1 9. Refuse containers ..... shall be concealed by landscaping or block/masonry walls. Responso: e .. Carried over from the SR Zone, but modified. Current SR requirement reads .....shall be concealed by landscaping or other means. We feel the language change is uncalled for and simply adds unnecessary cost. Z 00030 52 Proposals 1 10 through 12. These are essentially carried over from the existing SR Zone and we have no objection. Proposal 1 13. Fencing: refers to the fencing requirements contained in the Development Standards of the underlying Zoning District. Response: This is a new requirement. The Development standards sec- tion says "....the developer must provide the same type of fencing including perimeter subdivision fencing". TThis says no change in the type of fencing previously provided. Perhaps this ought to address only those fences that are visible from the street. If in an existing development concrete block walls were provided, then the requirement could be that those walls that are visible from the street shall be of the same material, but would not make that requirement between houses when not visible from the street. The cost ramifications are significant, amounting on average to several thousand dollars per house. Proposal f 14. Exterior materials: siding shall be stucco, plaster, mason- ry or a similar material. Wood, or materials of a similar appearance, may be used as trim and design accents for up to a maximum of 20 percent of the surface wall area ......etc. k Response: This is a new requirement. It works now absent such a requirement. Architecture, materials used and styles are ever changing. Let the marketplace dictate. We think such a requirement is unnecessarily inflexible and inappropriate. Proposal 1 15. Roof eaves must extend a minimum of 18 inches from the wall except for flat roof houses. E, 000.390 51 Response: This is a new requirement. Architecture, materials used, styles are ever changing. Some current architecture specif- ically does away with overhangs. See the Topaz development in La Quinta. Let the marketplace dictate. We think such a requirement is unnecessarily inflexible, excessive and inappropriate. If the objective is to be sensitive to energy requirements, then it is currently already considered by the State of California Title 24 calculationg,'which are specifically fashioned for this part of the state for the specific house under consideration, including the orienta- tion of that house toward the sun. Proposal 1 16. Building colors subject to approval. Response: This is a new requirement. Why is a change needed? Home- owners repainting their own homes are not subject to such a requirement. We object to this requirement. one of the following methods shall be used to review new single family dwelling unit proposals prior to the issuance of a build- ing permit. Proposal 1 1. The precise plans process (Section 9.42.110) shall be used for single family dwelling units proposed for construction on a lot within: a) an approved specific plan where the unit has received prior approval; and b) a tract recorded after May 1, 1982, where the unit has received City archi- tectural approval and no change is proposed; c) the SR Zoning District; and d) a subdivision recorded prior to May 1, 1982. Response: This is a new requirement. As all single family dwelling uni 4 t 000391 54 Why? The definitions are vague. For example, a major change is defined as something not defined as a minor change. A minor change means modification of some specified items, but not limited to those items. What then is a minor change? 5 ()91)39^ 55 The Draft Ordinance includes a section that indicates a new chapter would be created in the zoning ordinance entitled: . „ .. ; f'3'Z�T- Except as noted, we have no comments. Proposal —section 2d. Requires complete site landscaping plan.... stamped "ap- proved" by the Riverside County Agricultural Commissioner's office... Response: Currently CVWD reviews such plans. If that be the case, recommend no change. As to City review, recommend such a plan be limited to that landscaping that constitutes the perimeter of the development. It would be our hope that the City would develop a "standard" specification for individual houses, indicating numbers and sizes of required landscap- ing, and approved plant material and trees. If at least in conformance with that "standard" no individual house land- scape plans would be required. Proposal Sect on 4. Color boards required. Response: Typically each house is designed with three elevations. Typically a subdivision has three or four different floor - plans. Typically, four or five color schemes are selected. If a color board is required for each house and each eleva- tion, potentially 60 color boards would be required. Sug- gest one color board for each color scheme, with "typical" plans shown. Development Standards for Compatibility Review Process The units shall only be approved when they comply with the following standards: Proposal # 2. General justification language proposed. 000393 56 Response: When classified as requiring compatibility review,,a sub- division has been recorded, and probably partially or completely improved. It is therefore inappropriate to provide for a review process that considers needs for dedication of streets, review of drainage, etc. Those improvements would already be in place. Changing the size of the houses proposed for the lots is not going to change those needs. Proposal 1 3. A two story houses cannot be constructed adjacent to an existing single story home. Response: What if the previous builder or approved development provid- ed for one and two story houses? Proposal # 4. Lot fencing. Developer must use same type of fencing.... Response: As indicated above, recommend this be limited to that fenc- ing that is visible from the street. Also, fencing should be allowed to be upgraded from the original approval without further hearings by the City. Proposal 1 5 Homes that are constructed must have a garage of the same size as an existing home within 100 feet. Response: It is unclear whether or not the proposed new homes could have three car garages if the prior homes provided only two car garages. Taken literally, it would appear from this re- quirement that garages larger than two car garages have become status symbols. At what point does this requirement end? In a "custom" subdivision, in which houses would be 7 09�'394 built on scattered lots, would this require the same size garages for all houses. is the requirement to consider simply square footage of the garage or simply the width of the garage? It's certainly possible to have a 600 square foot garage that would have a garage door for only two cars, but to provide additional tandem parking. Proposal 1 6 Proposes single family dwelling must contain same roof material, window treatment and garage door style of the existing units within the same tract. Response: As indicated in the cover letter, this requirement'is a direct reversal of the existing SR ordinance, section 9.42.080 says: "Architectural Variety When houses using similar architectural styles are located withlin) two hundred fifty feet of each other- eYterinr building _�_o _�_ for architectural variety by using Different elevations Sud/I Il101CC provision ryi architectural - --- colors styles roof treatments window treatments garage door treatments, and similar methods " (Emphasis added) We feel the current policy of encouraging architectural difference is appropriate. If this is such a good idea, why might it not be applied in neighborhoods that have been developed for the construction of custom homes? Do you really want an entire neighborhood to be the same? Proposal 1E 7. New homes shall contain similar architectural material, colors and roof lines as the existing units within the same tract. Response: See item f 6 above. Same response. Proposal if 8o must provide a 24" box tree in the front yard. Response: s .000395 SQ This was never discussed by our committee. It adds approxi- mately $50 to the cost of a house, depending on the type of tree installed. This appears to be an arbitrary requirement suggested by staff and seems to us unnecessary. Proposal 10. The single family units proposed cannot deviate by more than 20% from the square footage of the existing units. Response: We have prepared a detailed response which is attached hereto as Exhibit "B". Proposal ,#11 The Commission when approving compatibility units may limit the type and the number of a particular unit to be con- structed within the subdivision. Response: This item is new, was never discussed in the committee meetings of the Compatibility committee and we feel is entirely inappropriate. We feel that the City and/or its representatives, staff or elected/appointed commissions is not qualified to make marketing decisions as to which products ay merchant in the City ought to offering at their place of business. Further, should the City put itself in the position to dictate prod- uct, we feel there may be some economic liability that the City will assume. Is that really a position the City wants to put itself in? F] en Exhibit "B" BIA Response to proposal t 10 of the proposed Compatibility Review Process. We have prepared a chart, which is enclosed, of all the current and recent developments in La Quinta, and other developments of interest, indicating thereon what the range of houses sizes are/were as offered by the original developer. The chart indicates the cumulative sales rate per week for each of the developments, the number of lots remaining for development and the current status of the ownership of the development. Also indicated on the chart are the sizes that would be allowed if that developer or a new developer would propose to change his product for one reason or another, using 20, 30, and 40t deviations from the originally approved plans, assuming in all cases that the minimum square footage per- mitted is 1200 square feet. As can be seen from the chart, the average range in original square footage is 697 square feet from smallest house to largest house. It can also be seen on the chart that the development that initially raised the issue of compatibility, Quinterra, is above the average square footage for the smallest house for those developments on the chart and below the average for range of square footage offered. That means it had bigger houses than the norm, and a narrower range of footage of- fered than the norm. Additionally, the chart shows that houses of all sizes, starting at 1006 square feet, are in the immediate vicinity of Quinterra. At the outset of the discussions of the City Council ap- pointed committee of homeowners, staff and BIA members, staff presented sample ordinances from other cities which have adopted so called "Compatibility" ordinances, namely Moreno Valley, Hemet and San Jacinto. The ordinances for those cities varied in allowable variation percentage be- tween 25 and 35% of the original footage range and only the San Jacinto ordinance spoke to the question of minimum square footage, which is 1000 square feet. The original staff draft ordinance that was presented for discussion 1 000397 contained a 30% variation provision. The draft of the La Quinta ordinance that we have available as this is written provides for a 20% variation, and we are advised some in the City are arguing for a maximum lot variation. The bottom line objective of the proposed compatibility `rdinance would appear to be to create building requirements 'Vhat.would somehow assure that present homeowners will not experience a reduction in the value of their homes by in- sisting :subsequent'builders build essentially the same houses as were built originally. That's not a solution. By way of example, within the 18 Quinterra houses that were built by the original builder, there is wide variation in the sales price for the same floor plans built by that original builder, due to the lender taking over the develop- ment and deeply discounting the remaining houses. Plan Price Size $/SF Closing Comments Ludlum 3 .-..I WW 1990900 ca » 2593 77.OV 77.09 V/JU/Nd 12/7/92 Kneur/ 2 169*900 2363 71.90 5/20/93 Bernot McCombs 1 198,900 2072 95.99 6/18/92 Job 3 1820148 2593 70.24 5/28/93 Crouch/ 2 2050000 2363 86.75 3/12/92 , Leiman Mercy l 1990900 2072 96.47 1/27/92 Bradley 2 169,900 2363 71.90 5/25/93 Williams 1 149,900 2072 72.34 8/25/93 Dupaix 1 155,000 2072 74.80 9/15/93 Saunders/ 3 179,900 2593 69.37 4/27/93 Robertson Hiller 3 1758000 2593 67.48 9/30/93 Rowlett 1 149,900 2072 72.34 5/14/93 Rowlett 2 159,900 2363 67.66 5/14/93 Tette 1 185,640 2072 89.59 1/28/93 Hunter 1 17919oo 2072 86.82 6/2/93 Model Dewy 3 210,000 2593 80.98 7/2/93 Model Bradford 2 199,900 2363 84.59 5/13/93 Model 1, 149,900 199,900 50,000 33% 2 159,900 205,000 45,100 28% . 3 175,000 247,900 72,900 42% The range in prices for the houses' dif f ers by $98,000 or 65%. 2 00r398 Al Because of the decline in the general real estate market, home values, new and used, have declined. For the same reasons, lot values have declined. Lenders who have taken back lots from developers are deeply discounting them, thus if a new builder built exactly the same house as the origi- nal builder, he could sell it for substantially less than the original builder, as essentially evidenced by`the Quint- erra sales price differences. Thus, it is impossible to regulatorily solidify home values. To perpetuate the mis- takes of the past will not solidify existing home values. Some of the loudest opponents of the original proposal to build smaller houses within Quinterra were folks who took advantage of the deeply discounted prices offered by the foreclosing lender. They experienced no public opposition from the buyers that preceded them. In our democratic society, is it fair, as in the case of Quinterra, that in a development consisting of 116 lots, 18 of those lot owners get to dictate the fate of the remaining 98 lots? 3 000399 Al 1 a A IIoI lilt 1111 ;11x 1 eR�«� 1A11 1111H uYYi l* miff Mg PM E IM111911 1 �111 J111 1RRQ 1-H! 1 11_19 =RFit a�:1 #111.1��171AA1 1 Q1�1a11R1 1 s oil 1�31 101�_11R1 �11? 1 1118$�1g1 1 0 RRRP ull if 12R�c_@ lRbiryf i rR��Q8fi eii# i �:=iC AR."�i At•R-�R.Q II iiAS -AAi w i toll HI 111 Aw11 s�gA 111A 1 R�a�-=11� 1 ! '11 111g 1,111 1R1€ i 1^1a-�«Aa : Sj ee _i eeAi �Iai =ee eRAi II Balsa ills, i m 00011`10 63 SENT BY:Xtrox Telccopier 7020 ;11— 9-13 ; 4:04PR ; 161977171014 $32537914 1 CITY OF LA Q UINTA MEMORANDUM TO: RUSSELL ROBERTS .-4W MIKE MARIX JIM CROWE" LANCE ELDRED FROM: JMY HERMAN. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR elk DATE: NOVEMBER 9, 1993 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF DRAFT REGULATIONS RELATING TO HOUSE SIZE AND COMPATIBILITY STANDARDS Attached is the verbiage drafted to deal with house sizes and compatibility. The draft is on the Council Study Session at 3,00 P.M. on the November 16, 1993 meeting. Should you wish to provide written comments, please get them to me by Friday morning (November 12th). The Planning Commission will conduct a formal public hearing in December and a Council hearing in January. Your written and verbal comments can also be given during or before these meetings. I'll send you a notice of the hearing. Any questions, pleasd give me a call (777-7125). cc: City Council City Manager RECEIVED MBMOJ_323 R1 CO tSTONE oevELOPEF —... o a c 4 1.. AA StNI BY:XerOx Telecopier 7020 ;11- 8-33 : 4;04VY ; 10197717101• E3253791:8 2 TO BE ADDED TO THE R-1, R-29 R-2a R-3, R-V ZONES Single Family Dwelling Unit T>w*tonme�l All single family residential uses shall comply with the fbDowing development standards. I. WiiAinlum gross livable area shall be 19300 square feet, excluding the garage, as mmwrtd from the exterior walls of the dwelling except in senior citizen or affordable housing subdivisions (the State reguladons for affordable housing will be used). Through a canditiooal use pennit process, the MIXI rtit nay vary as follows: a. The minimum gross livable area may be a minimum 750 square foes, for a senior citizen or affordable housing subdivision provided that the overan density of the subdivision/development does not exceed the density as designated by the General Plan Land Use Diagram. 2. Bedroom dimensions: a minimum of ten foot clear width and depth dimensions, as measures from the interior was of the room. 3. Bathrooms: there shall not be less than one and one-half baths in one or two bedroom dwellings, and not less than one and three-quarter baths in dwdllrtgs with three or move bedrooms, excepting that one and one-half baths may be permitted for the latter provided that both bathrooms have bathing facillties. 4. Garage dimensions: each dwelling shall have a two -car garage with interior dimensions not lets than tweety feet square (20' X 20'), which space shall contain clear of mechanical equipment, appliances, or other improvements which conflict with its purpose to store vehicles. An additional four feel shall be provided to the width or depth if mechanical equipment or appliances, including but nbt limited to washer, dryer, and forced air unit, are ground -mounted within the gars interior. A water heater is permitted without addidoaai interior garage area being • provided that it is located so as not to conflict with vehicular patidag or acau. S. Access between house and g; a separate pedeatriatt door into the garage ahan be provided as either an interconnecting door providing direct aooess between the dwelling and garage, or a pedestrian door leading outside to a paved walkway area which is sheltered by a minimum thirty-six inch roof eave, enclosed within a aechned, walled arcs and provides thud access to a keyed entry into the dwellIng. 6. Mechanical and related equipment: heating and cooling mechanical equipment shad be ground -mounted and screened from all aides. DOCJH.092 1 ` _....- 00040^ bLNI UY:xerox To►ecopisr 7020 ;11- 8-13 : 4:05PM ; 10117777101-1 i. 13253791:8 3 7. 91u eave-end of all dwelling roofs which run parallel. measuringr p a distance of five feet ar less from the'comnwn property line, shall be equipped with a rain gutter, and downspout dirwW to an approved d mftiagmy. 8. Landscaping: the front yard of all lots, and in addition, the side yard of corner lots, OW' be landscaped to property line per the requirem&nts of the development standards of the Zoning District, 1 9. Screening: refuse containers and bottled gas tanks shall be concealed by landscaping or blockJma3onry walls. 10. Underground utilities: all electric services, overhead wins, or associated structures must be installed underground. 11. Driveway materials: the driveway shall be surfaced'with concrete and constructed in accordance with City standards. 12. Lighting: all exterior lighting shall be located and dirgcted so as not to shine directly on adjacent properties or otherwise create a nuisance. 13. Fencing: refer to the fencing requirements contained !in the Development Standards of the underlying Zotung District', 14. Exterior materials: siding shall be stucco, plaster,; masonry or a similar material. Wood, or materials of a similar appearance, may be u�d as trim and design accents for UP to a maximum of 20 percent of the sorfaa wall &M on any ore side of the house. Excepting flat roofs, roof material shall be clay or edac'Me tile, and sball be ratrd as Class A". 15. Eaves: roof eaves must extend a minimum of 18 inches from the wall except for flat roof houses. Eaves shall be larger when necessary to provide adequate protection over door openings. 16. Building colors: exterior siding, roof and trim colors am "act to approval. Single Emily Dwelling Unit ApMW ft=- tine of the following methods shall be used to review new cin$le famr7y dwelling unit proposals prior to the issuance of a building permit. 1 . 1. The precise plan process (Section 9.42.110) shall be usbd for Burgle family dweriing uttita proposed for construction on a lot within: a) an approved specific plan when the unit has reoeived prior approval; and b) a tract recorded after May 1, 1982. where the unit has received City arehitectu ll approval and no change is proposed; c) the SR Zoning District, and d) a subdivision recorded prior to May 10 1982. DOCJH.092 2 DRAFT 0004_03 Arl SENT BT:Xerox ]olecopler 702D ;11— 9-13 : 4:05PI ; 10117777101- 132537914 4 2. Mw compatlbluty review pro" (Section „� shall beDRAFT used for airy single family dwelling unit proposed for Construction within a subdlvlsion that was recorded after May .1, 1982, and partially built out in phases and the units proposed are eiassii%d a major Change from the previously approved units that. Minor and Maior C banM I i I A minor change can be approved by the Planning and opment Department without a public beating. 14fUW change means a modit3cad of an approved architectural unit within It sabdiviaivn that involve items such as, but, not limited to, Columns, dormer vents, window size, plant -on iocati ms, color, grid stucco texture. 'ittie Planning and Development Director may refer the minor change to the Design Review Board and Planning Commission for a non -hearing compatibility review. A major change 1s subject to the review and approval process of Section Compatibility Review Process. A major change means any exterior architecture change not defined as a minor change. A major change meansuty exterior architeew al change, floor plan, or landscaping modification not defted as a minor ebange, including but not limited to, square footage, number of stories, garageizes. aocnr.o>i= ORpF� H .._.._..._ , ..,.. -. OOC4A 67 SENT BY'.Xerox Telecopier 7020 ;11— 8-93 : 445P1 15197777101• E3253791;1 5 D RAFT A NEW CHAP= WOULD BE CREATED IN THE ZONING ORDINANCE The completed application along with the following information than be submitted to the Planning and Development Department. 1. One copy of the preliminary title report or deed of trust to the subject property. 2. Sets of the site development plan (number as required by the Planning and Development Department), each set to incorporate the following; a. Dimensioned floor plan(&) relating to all building layout aspects, showing bedrooms, kitchens, hallways, baths, etc. b. Four -point elevations of the units proposed, nesting architectural feature(s), relationships to existing residential units on adjacent prcpertiti, and listing proposed building materials, fetishes, colon, etc. C. A detailed site plan delineating all siting aspem of the development (Le., setbacks, topography, fencing locations, locations provided for ground -mounted mechanical and heating/air condibotring systems, parldng, accessways, adjacent streets, utilities, and drainage. d. A complete site landscaping plan, showing a listing of quantities, species, location and plant sizes to be incorporated Into the final landscaping of the project. The final approved landscape plan must be stampled 'approved' by the Riverside County Agricultural CommlWoner's office pfior to the issuance of a building permit. 3. Two sets of all plans reduced to eight and one half inches by eleven inches, and submitted on other similar format suitable for presentation. 4. One eight inch by ihirtan inch color, material and finish sample board for the unit's exterior areas, including, but not limited to, root ooverinS. facia boards. Me inlays, stucco finish, wood or other plant -,on materials, etc. Colors and materials OWI be toyed on at least one set of architectural elevations. 3. One colored elevation of an sides of the unit oriented to public view, in a000tdance with the materials sample board submitted. 6. Any other additional information as may be required.' No residential application shall be processed until all information as required by this chapter has been submitted. Detomimtion of completeness sbali be in atom dance with the provisions of the California Government erode 65943 or successor provisidrrs. i DIRAFT O'H 4 0 5 (R SENT BY:xerox Tetecopier 7020 ;11- 9-93 ; 4:07po 16197777101-6 93253791;s 6 i Develoment Standards for Comalibilily Red DRAFT The units shall only be approved when they comply with the'fallowing standards: 1. The proposed use conforms to all the provisions of the General Plan and specific plans, and with all applicable requirements of State law and the ordinances of the City. 2. The overall development of the land is designed for & protection of the public health, safety, and general welfare; conforms to the logicuk development of the land and is compatible with the present and future logical development of surrounding property. The plan considers the location and nerd for dedication and,improvement of noceuary streets and sidewallec, including the avoldance of traffic cohgesdon, and takes into account topographical and drainage conditions, including the need for dedication and improvements of necessary structures as a part thereof. 3. A two story house cannot be construcW adjacent to an existing single story home developed In a prior phase. i 4. If lot fencing has been provided in the subdivision, developer must provide the same type of fencing including perimeter subdivision fench . 5. Homes including the gmne of the same size must be bonstructed on lots that are within 100 feet of any existing home. For this purpose if any portion of a vacant lot is within the 100 foot distance this request applies. 6. A proposod single family dwelling unit must contain the sane roof material, window treatment, and garage door style of the existing units within the same tract 7. All new homes shall contain similar a bitecture material, colors, and roof lines as the existing units within the same tract. 8. At least one specimen (240 box) tree shall be provided in the front yard in addition to the landscape requirenwnts of the zone. 9. All single family dwelling units proposed must comply with the requirenwts contained in the Development Standards Section , 10. The single famtfly dwelling units proposed cannot d ' le by more than 20% front the square footage of the existing units (i.e., 1,350 aqua foot house can range from 1,300 to 1,620 or a 2,350 square foot house can range fro 1,880 to 288M. 11. The Commission when approving compatibility urdta may limit the type and the number of a particular unit to be constructed within the subdivision. DRAFT Wal. SENT BY:Xerox Tel:copier 7020 ;11- 9-93 : 4:05PR : 15197777101• 93253791:1 7 DRAFT The Design Review Board than review all proposed units and make a recommendation to the Planning Commission, The Design Review Board shall take one of the following actions during their review: 1. Recommend approval as submitted. ' 2. Recommend modification. I' 3, Refer to the Planning Commission without a recomm i dation. The request before the Design Review Board is a non -hearing item, however, public comment can be taken at the di=etion of the Board from the applican f or interested parties, PLAMWG COMM ION REVIEW All residential units shall be approved, conditionally approved, or disapproved by action of the Planning Commission, based upon the standards referred to in Seetlon of this Chapter and the recommendation of the Design Review Board. The �Wowiog findings must be made when an application is approved: I - 1. The =Wtectural aspects of the development will be compatible with and not detrimental to other existing units in the subdivision. 2. Applicable development standards including, but not limited to, setbacks, panting, landscaping, site design, and similar features, will be compatible with and not detrimental to, other existing units in the subdivision. PUBLIC HEARING PROCM The Planning Commission shall hold a public hearing on all applicatlons. Notice of the time, date, and plane of the public hearing shall be given at least ten 'calendar days prior to the hearing by the following procedurm 1. Mailing to all owners of real property which is located within three hundred fed of the exterior boundaries of the parcel, lot, subdivision phase to be. eonsideted u such owners ue shown on the last equalized assessment roll. 2. Publication once in a newspaper of general eircu]adoe In the (Sty. I The Plan' Director may y require that adclitional dotice be given by enlarging the notification radius. APPEAL SS The applicant or any other aggrieved party may appeal the decWon of the Planning Commission by the following procedure: DOM.092 6 DRAFT 000.407 SENT BY:Xerox 7e1ecopier 7020 :11— 9-03 : 4:09po 1811177771014 03253791;8 6 DRAFT 1. Appeal to the aty CouncU within ten calendar days after the date of the Planning Commission's decision, the applicant of aggrieved piety may appeal the decision, In writing, to the Pity Council on the forms provided * the Planning and Development Department, Upon receipt of a completed appeal, the City Clerk Shall set the matter for hearing before the City Council not less than five calendar days nor more than thirty calendar days thereafter, and shall give written notice of the hearing in the same manner that notice was given for the Planning Commission hearing. City Council shall render its derision within thirty calendar days following the close of the hearing on the appeal. The application and appeal fees shall be established by ' resolution. i i I I 0 0 CRAFT 000408 71 SENT BY;Xorox Tolocopior 7020 ;11— 9-93 : 4:09pM ; 16197777101.6 93253791;8 9 Compatibility Review Application Precise Plan Application Appeals Applicant or aggrieved party. Docal1.094 DRAFT, 0004 119 72 DEC•17 '93 04:40PM :NCO HOPES I I INOO HOMES Inlaq�dDftlort TO: auistipe (narks FROM: Steve 1 noel DATE- December 17,1993 •e P.2 I I DEC % s. 1993� ' I I have reviewed the Planning and Development Department Memorandum to the Pasturing Commission, dated December 14, 1993, regarding the above optioned topic, The foUawing comments set forth my opinion regarding the ivarious subtopics involved with the particular matt s: 1; Minimum House Size- i I I concur with the BIA proposal of 1e200 sq.� ft.: however, the STAMKO proposal has merit as it allows the typical percentage of a plan mix to occur below a proposed minimum of 1,400 sq. f L 2. $Sthmnme The "Recommended Change" is acceptable. 3. Further discussion should oeaa relative to t1 a use of a door exiting out of a garage onto a covered porch leading into the entry of the home --without the use of an enclosed wall area 4. Meehwiicsll dna related a uinp momti I concur with the BIA proposal. S. T Wasswr1w, . , I , I concur with the BIA recommendation to it* the cost of adding front yard Iands" W a standard and, if adoptcd as a requirement, what should tba :andscapinp include in terms �f plant and irrigation material. I & �eeatna: ! I concur with the B1 A recommendation. 7. Fencingi I concur with the BIA recommendation. Some communities bavc required block or mason? walls Connecting the homes, but not along the common side and rear property H= 1s2wwtxAnW WVrP" � .uu PAL ..e.,.. 0 0 0 4 :3 o 7 73 i' '93 04:40PM R CO HOMES P.3 T� . f7 M 70 I cone= with the ILIA reoomnsendation. MW market dictates the =eptaWly of exterior tt terids and should cmtin ie to do so rather than through legislation which typically fails to keep pw with trends in the market, I concur with the BIA recommendation. 10. Bulldincr tore: Both new and edsting residential structures should come under the same level of scrutiq. with respect to the balance of the material it relates to the compatibility of new residences in parfaAy developed subdivisions and not to our proposed new development. I 0004111 74 Dec 14,1993 05:07PM FROM HIRSHIpa-AW HAWINS December 14, 1993 La Quints City Hall VIA FAX 777-7101 RE: C "A" TO 7777101 P.01 Aw fP E DEC 14 ;3)01 GUY 0k'LA (,UItjTA PLANNING U,;PA'ArgiF.NT Dear Planning Commission, City Council and Planning Department: Due to the incomplete and inaccurate information provided to the La Quint& Planning Commission by the Building Industry Association regarding minimum square footage requirements in the Coachella Valley, North La Quinta Homeowners submit the following corrections (verified by personal contact with representatives of the planning departments of each respective city on 12/14/93): SINGLE FAMILY DWELLINGS �J,TY MINIMUM SO, FT. REQUIRED LOT SIZE(sQ t) CATHEDRAL CITY 1,200 (min. 3 bdrms) ALL 1,000 (2 bdrm or less) ALL COACHELLA 11050 (+ 380 sq. ft. garage 61000 and 2 bdrm or less) 1,200 (+ 380 sq. ft garage 61000 and 3 bdrm min.) DESERT HOT SPRGS 1,200 ALL INDIAN WELLS 2,000 ALL INDIO 1,100 (current) 6 - 7,000 1,400 (current) 8,000+ 1,200 (effective in 1994) ALL LA QUINTA 750 ALL R-1 PALM DESERT 1,000 (+400 sq. ft, 2 car garage) 8 - 10,000 1,250 (+400 sq. ft. 2 car garage) 10 - 15,000 1,500 (i400 sq. ft. 2 car garage) 15,000t PALM SPRINGS 11500 15 - 20,000 1,100 71500 - 10k RANCHO MIRAGE 1,400 (+400 eq. ft. 2 ear garago ALL and 2 bdrm 1% bath min.) sin @rely, r Sara- annine Robertson 44930 Tortola Circle 1 La Quinta, CA 92253 0 0 0 4 1 7 75 WRITTEN CORRESPONDENCE ATTACHMENT #3 0004V 121 Bill riverside county region building industry association of southern colrtrnia, inc. December 22, 1993 Ms. Katie Barrows, Chairwoman La Quinta Planning Commission 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 awrwwww�+vx+wcaa�vm ,.w.w.+.,. i...yac,.vr.w=m.+.a. QUU6t t ' DEC 2 8 1993 y Re: Zoning Ordinance Amendment 93-039 regarding minimum house size and compatibility within residential subdivisions Dear Ms Barrows: As we discussed in our meeting of December 20, 1993, the Building Industry Association Desert Chapter respectfully requests the following: At the regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting of December 28, 1993, that the ongoing public hearing concerning La Quinta City draft RI compatibility ordinance be continued to the Commission's February 8, 1994 meeting. That the Commission approve a resolution to the City Council requesting appointment of a special study group made up of two council members, two Planning Commission members, two city staff, two homeowners and two building industry members. That this group be directed to meet in City Hall for the express purpose of discussing the draft R-1 ordinance as presently formulated in context with comments presented by Building Industry Association Desert Chapter and others interested in the ordinance. That this committee give direction to city staff to modify the present draft to reflect information generated through meetings of this group. That the redrawn draft R-1 ordinance then be placed before the public at the continued February 8, 1994 public hearing and be considered for adoption by the Planning Commission at close of subject public hearing. 000414 3600 Lime Street, Suite 221, Riverside, CA 92501 (909) 781-7310 Telefax # (909) 781-0509 77-564 Country Club Drive, Suite 400-13, Palm Desert, CA (619) 360-2476 Telefax # (619) 772-3372 32 Ms. Katie Barrows December 22, 1993 Page 2 The Building Industry Association Desert Chapter is making this request in the sincere belief that any delay generated will be positive in the long run due to a more complete understanding of the ordinance. Respectfully, Allan Levin First Vice President Desert Chapter cc: La Quinta Planning Commission City of La Quinta Mayor City of La Quinta City Council 00041'5 33 Law Offices of ROBERT L PIPPIN VIRGINIA S. CRISTE MICHAEL A. CRISTE IRWIN L OOLDS MARIE A. BOCHNEWICH CRLM, CRLM A PIPPIN 77-364 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE SUITE 220 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 December 22, 199 Planning Commission City of La Quinta C/O Jerry Herman 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 TELEPHONE: (619) M7100 FACS04EU: (619) M-71It OF COUNSEL: •�'�'°""f`p YN FISHER f i fi r 'DECJ2 g 1993 `""` IA GU MA LITY Ot pj,ANNING DEpAaT�:.. RE; MINIMUM HOUSE 8I38 IN R-1 ZONING Dear Commission Members: I have recently been advised of your proposed action to raise the minimum house size in the City of La Quinta on a single family lot to 1400 sq.ft. Unfortunately, I shall be out of the area on the currently scheduled hearing date of December 28, 1993 so I have elected to make my initial comments to you in writing. In the first instance I would advise you that I live at 55020 Shoal Creek, La Quinta, California and am a citizen of your fair city. Secondly, the comments I make herein reflect my individual views and not necessarily the views of my law firm. I feel most strongly about the action you propose to take, and I apologize for the blunt comments that I shall hereinafter make. However, I truly believe your proposed actions are racist and or classist, and can only be described as a veiled attempt to keep the poorer classes of our citizens from purchasing housing in the City of La Quinta. Some of you may be aware that, in the past, I have built many homes in this valley. I am no longer in the development business. However, I do understand the .development business, and the construction of houses, and have strong opinions on the continuing escalation of housing sizes in this valley. Simply put, there is no legitimate City or planning purpose for forcing the minimum house size to 1400 sq.ft. I make this comment based on the following facts: 1. There is no difference in the construction quality of a 1400 sq.ft. home and a 1100 sq.ft. home. The same type of construction practices are used and the same material is used; 2. In 90% of the cases there is no difference in the room count between a 1100.sq. ft. home and a.1400 sq.ft. home.. Both homes generally have three bedrooms, two bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen and utility room. The only difference between clp/pippin.104 000416 34 Planning Commission City of La Quinta December 22, 1993 Page 2 the two homes is the size of the rooms; 3. In most cases the street scape of 1100 sq.ft. homes and 1400 sq.ft. homes is the same. Builders generally build homes as wide as the lot will allow in order to improve street appeal, and adjust the depth of the house to increase or decrease the size of the house. Thus, from the street, both houses look basically identical. In short, the only reason to raise the minimum house size to 1400 sq.ft. is to increase the cost of the house so that the poorer classes or races, "the riffraff" don't sully up the neighborhood. This type of action is simply indefensible on the part of a City, and particularly this City. The City of La Quinta in large part exists because of its hotels and golf course communities. These hotels and golf courses exist, for the most part, on the backs of our Hispanic work force. The City now proposes to tell these people that we appreciate their sweat and toil, but we do not want people of their type or economic class owning their own single family home in our fair city. "Work here, but take your old car and drive back to Coachella or Mecca to live". Over the years I have watched the phenomenon take over most cities in this State. As the city becomes larger and more successful it starts driving up house size to "attract a better class of people." This mentality is not proper city planning and is not proper city government. It is my hope that the City of La Quinta will have the wisdom to avoid this problem and not become a test case on the issue of whether making housing unaffordable to the poor or racial minorities by raising the minimum house size constitutes de facto discriminatory practice. Thank you very much for your attention. Very truly yours, CRISTE, CRISTE & PIPPIN &a", - zz(v Robert L. ..f. /rlp r1p/plpp1n.104 000417 W DATE: TO: VIA: REFERENCE: MEMORANDUM from The Law Office of Lantson E. Eldred November 12, 1993 IVAU 0000MMUMN-fte L nv15199.� CITY OF (� 7a1� PLAN'+::,. i�PkAT�1EA1T Mr. Jerry Herman, Director Planning and Development Department City of La Quinta FAX / US Mail Housing Compatibility Standards I would suggest the following clarificationhnodifications to the DRAFT Development Standards for Compatibility review process applicable to build -out of partially constructed tracts. 1. Item 5 - It should be clear that the distance to be measured is not from an existing "home" (meaning the physical structure) but rather, from the boundaries of the lot upon which any existing homes are constructed. Secondly I would suggest that a larger transition zone such as 200 feet would be appropriate along a street which is partially developed. So that the transition zone would include all lots within 200 feet of the property line of existing homes measured along the curb of existing streets, and 100 feet from all other property lines. Further, the last sentence of this section makes reference to this provision as being a "request". I believe this in fact is a requirement. 2. Item 8 - I believe should provide, at least within the compatibility transition zone defiled in section 5, that the visible front yard, and any street visible side ,yard landscaping be consistent as to types of allowed landscaping materials and specific planting standards or requirements established within the previously constructed portion of the tract, so that any higher standards established would be continued at least through the transition zone. 3. Item 1 - Contains a mathematical error, the deviation with respect to the 1350 square foot house would create a range from 1080 feet to 1620, not from 1300 to 1620. Further I believe that a deviation of 20% or even 25% from the average, mid -point or medium range of the previously Nov/12-(Sty of LQ 1 000418 36 constructed homes would be appropriate. A suggested range of homes up to 20% smaller than the smallest existing unit through 20% larger than the largest unit creates an excessively large allowed deviation that would not appear to represent consistency nor compatibility. If the deviation is to be measured from the extremes of the existing constructed range rather than from the median or mid -point, then I believe that the allowed deviation should be no more than 10% smaller than the smallest existing structure with perhaps a larger maximum deviation from the largest structure allowed. With respect to the approval process draft, I strongly support the creation of a category of minor changes which might be approved by staff without public hearing or requiring involvement of the Planning Commission or the full Council which should be required only for approval of major changes. I applaud the time and effort of yourself and the staff in the various meetings which we have held and in developing these draft ordinances. Nov/12-City of LQ 2 000419 37 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 277-3622 December 3, 1993 VIA FAX Mr. Jerry Herman Director of Planning & Development City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: PROPOSED MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSING IN R-1 ZONES Dear Jerry: As you are aware, Stamko Development Co., a California Limited Partnership (Stamko), is the owner of 132 acres east of Washington Street, south of Miles Avenue and west of Adams Street which contains 300 lots of R-1 zoning. Stamko is presently in a deal with Inco Homes Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (Inco) for Inco to purchase from Stamko the 300 lots. Inco had feasibility studies prepared on the 300 lots. These feasibility studies showed that the 300 lots should be developed into a 1,200 to 1,800 square foot residential housing project. This footage requirement results in base sales prices of $110,000.00 to $140,000.00. Enclosed is a copy of a December 2, 1993 letter with enclosures to me from Steve Kabel, President of Inco Homes - Inland Division, addressing the minimum square footage as it relates to their feasibility studies, floor plans and sales prices. The City of La Quinta is presently considering a new minimum square footage requirement for single family detached housing in the R-1 zones. A major portion of the present market segments is first time buyers and empty nesters which has resulted in the down sizing of the houses in order to accommodate these buyer's income. As a result, Inco's feasibility studies reflect three different square footage uses which consist of 1,250 square feet, 1,550 square feet and 1,800 square feet. The 1,250 square foot plan will entice this major portion of the market segment of first time buyers and empty nesters. 0004 '0 38 Mr. Jerry Herman December 3, 1993 Page 2 In order to set a citywide square foot minimum for the R-1 zone, the City of La Quinta MDST CONSIDER that the R-1 zoning north of the Whitewater Storm Channel (Channel) east of Washington Street south of Fred Waring and west of Jefferson Street can presently only accommodate 1,200 to 1,800 square foot residential houses. The 1,200 square foot house would have a base sales price of approximately $110,000.00. Please note that every additional 100 square feet added to a house results in an increased purchase price of $5,000.00. Therefore, your 1,800 square foot house would have a sales price of approximately $140,000.00. The City of La Quinta should consider increasing the present 750 square foot minimum to 1,200 square feet. As an alternative to a 1,200 square foot minimum, the City could also consider establishing a 1,400 square foot minimum allowing no more than 25% of an 11R-1 zoned project" to have residential houses in the range from 1,100 to 1,400 square feet. If you have any questions, please call me. Very ly C IKE CFC/lrc Enclosure(s) cc: Steve Kabel, Inco Homes (w/o enc.) - via fax Tom Bienek (w/enc.) - via fax Carol S. May (w/enc.) - via fax Peter Kontny (w/o enc.) yours, F. CLAM 0004?1 39 e.L INW ( P40M9 e December 2, 1993 i Christine F. Clarke Stamko Development Company 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Dear Chrie. I am hopeful that this transmittal will assist the City Planning Director in arriving at a reasonable recommendation regarding the minimum liveable floor area for single family detached housing in the City of La,Quinta. First, per the attached floor plans and elevations, ranging is floor area size from 1,129 sq. ft. to nearly 1,4o0 sq. ft., it should be noted that (i) the functionality of the floor plan varies only by room count, and (2) by the architectural appearance of the exterior of the home you cannot distinguish is the home is a 1,000 sq. ft. or 1,400 sq. ft. in area. With respect to functionality, the variation occurs primarily in bedroom. court and the typical addition of a family room as the plan gains floor area. By limiting the minimum floor area to 0 1,400 sq. .t., I am concerned that we have excluded a great portion of two market segments; namely, the entry-level buyer and the empty nester. Both of these market segments rely on affordable pricing and are not as concerned if the home contains 3 or 4 bedrooms. Our in-depth evaluation of the market, assisted by =wo independent market research companies and one nationally -recognized demographer, concludes that the denial of minimum floor areas in the range of 1,100 to 1,200 sq. ft. and the establishment of a minimum floor area of 1,400 sq. ft. would ef=e_lively increase the most affordable -priced home by $iC,000 to $15,000. The effects of such higher pricing on prospective homebuyers inc'ude: (1) a required loth greater cash down payment; and (2) a required :0V greater gross annual household earnings for loan qualification. 3o:h of these effects have a deleterious impact the first-time buyer and the empty -nester with fixed income. The City should selection of an consideration for wall as those empt ratiring it the c President ' Kgh Desen Divsion 13911 Pwk Avem e, suite 210 Vlmrvjie. CA 92392 (6t9) 241.5131 FAX f6191, 241.562E give careful thought to 'looking beyond the arbitrary minimum floor area and provide kind those seeking homeownership for the first time as y-nesters, with. sconomic limitations, desirous of nam-anity of La Quinta. Division Corporate aria 1282 W. Arrow Ifq% y P 0. sox 970 uaua. CA s1786 (9091981.8919 FAX (909) ON-2784 00r)440 ..". ..� _� ..�._....,I _,... •.,tea I P.2 Ux*pvdSlWxg eeanvPo. AddedMOMW Ocxarsrd �. J44r oanv r '11 I � K cin ---J nnn•� Nei { umo uvM mitts ssnaooy must : nme Artig% tlkKuttfOs ��"� B i s 1ALL $ATY LN'titY t � Lip \ y dZDDO x 8 p ssoltoom Den Opdam For BuUbin flfxfb!llty 1,129 sq. ft. GWWMWI.kwd I lthorSWAP 9" Lv 000420 41 r' � J�i • onswu 11MlYN IAILlLY LIVQIO MAsTn t}ATS IC comPtablo )pa" lD BALL lClooM I SI „� KITC83H DIl�1N0 F1t�Nt i = /brmalDtnr� J L_JL_J sEDA00Y 4 t{ ROOK 1 /DIN I CAE GARAOS i I MArtRA MROOM MAdjEE EATIi IiEsa� 01?IOMAL ISTltAT Optio" Re~ Arena — Tie AnrGcc c:WW";ay I,325 sq. it. on''4?G 44 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCM[R jAs. see"low1000 LAWYCAS W. i *WIN. 1001NOR0 323 ROVTH GRAND &VOWA .IAL100RIC CiN7p ALOeRT CRLIT�NCO. INO'�01 LO0 ANRhBR. OALIIORRIA 00011•A101 ..&AK nAIA efts IT am i010 C,CMTV11T RARR tABT 10V INL. CALIFORNIA *271A-4867 Ioo M an AVRWA %00 ANKLIS. CALI►OWWA 00097•8066 RRW TSAR, NSW TOM 10100'411004 0AC (71A) 001N000 400 CAPITOL MALL FAM61116I1 014) 401.41180 OACRANCNTO. CANIORMIA 00'A•AA0/ 10RO 001Rne0TNAT WCM11e. LLW, WABNRIBTON. O.O. 0111O W S0RR MAIM 7.O B BTAIeT December 8, 1993 RAM 0.900. BA6170►MIA f0101r4468 "t" LOVNR MB R•1000 0RV1040. 0K0AAI RAN IRANCIM ONt WQ"TOOMt RT BTRLt T. TtlCB1B TOWBR DAMS BAN PMArCIBCe. CAUF911"1A BAgA•.000 10A AVCIAK RA•MOM NIRBARI rtNLO MRR 7BIH MRIB, IRAl16B i000 BANG rwL ■OA 0• BVILOIN. 1 ulcc.. .. .. ._ _. __._:aa+n; NBNLO AARR. CAU10RM1A OAORB ,0/70 PALL MAL► rr�t j7 ' I' I LONRON tWfl w Riii I'^ _ 1f 1717 MAIN VOICCT y �11' �� . �._.?• eALLAR. TBA►B 7/aw•fi00 R ►LAOI """ p ^ 1993 "a" Raw If QALIIORNIA RTRttf DEC TORT. 00M"tR. CCL0RA00 BetOB-NM 1.1-1 MARIMOVOMI. CHI►RONIW BBAf "Aft I". JAP" I00 TWR0 AVROX - v • aeATTLt. TR10NIN0TOr RuealosR CITY GF LA CUO i in A A►ftIATte RAuel ARu1A Rse PLAN:LNIN^u'J;='RTNm;AT eNAr�u00, ws Isom WLOM WRITCA's OIRCCT DIAL NVMOeR .�.�_.... -_ - _._ •'- RITAOW HABA. SAVOI ARAOVI OVNI IILC NVMKR (714) 451-3894 T 72389-00004 The Planning Commission city of La Quints post office Box 1304 La Quints, CA 92253 Rat Proposed Zoning ordinance Changes Dear planning Commission Members: This firm represents PriMerit Banc, Federal savings Bank ("PriMerit"), the owner of certain lots in Tract 23913, which your planning staff has been referring to as the Quinterra subdivision (the "Property"). piriNerit is attempting to sell the Property to Forecast Development (now The Forecast Group, L.P.). Forecast submitted its plans for approval by the city. The Planning Commission approved the plans, but it conditioned its approval upon compliance with a minimum house size of 1,650 square feet. That condition was not acceptable to Forecast and, if left in place, would defeat PriMerit's plans to sell the property to Forecast. Forecast therefore appealed to the City Council, On November 2, 1993t the City council declined to rule on Forecast's appeal because of an interim ordinance adopted that day by the City Council imposing a moratorium on the issuance of building permits in narrow circumstances that applied only to the applications of Forecast and perhaps one other builder. The stated purpose of the moratorium was to enable the city of La Quints to consider certain changes in the City's zoning ordinances. 0004?8 46 GISSON,'DUNN d: CRUTCHER The Planning Coaoaission City of ZA Quint& December a, 1993 Page Z PriMerit has been advised, though it has not received formal notice, that the Planning Commission intends to conduct a hearing on December 14, 19930 at 7:00 p.m. to consider a proposed change in the city's zoning ordinances that would limit the ability of property owners in single family residential subdivisions that have been partially built out to change the house sizes in those subdivisions. Prixerit and Forecast strenuously object to the enactment of such ordinance changes on the following grounds: 1. The proposed zoning change is a discriminatory measure designed to forestall the Forecast proposal even though building permits should have been issued to Forecast long before the moratorium was enacted. 2. The proposed changes in the zoning ordinances would violate California Government Code 1 65961. All developments that have been partially built out must have a recorded final map, and PriMerit is not aware of any final maps for such developments having been recorded more than five years ago. Therefore, the City is prohibited by 5 65961 from imposing new conditions on those developments which could have been imposed at the time of tentative map approval, and the proposed zoning ordinance is designed to do precisely that. 3. The proposed zoning ordinance would violate the rights of PriMerit and Forecast to due process and equal protection of the laws under the Constitutions of both the United States and the State of California. Forecast and Prixerit are entitled to have the City rule upon Forecast's appeal based upon the laws that existed before the proposed changes are put in place, and that law would require the City to remove all conditions relating to house size from the Planning Commission's approval of Forecast's plans. 4. Pursuant to California Government Code 5 65961, PriMerit and Forecast are entitled to have Forecast's plans submitted for a ministerial plan check without further conditions being placed upon then, insofar as the proposed zoning ordinance would defeat that result, it is illegal. 0004 2q 47 GIBSON, DVNN & CRVTCNER The >Planninq Commission City of La Quinta Dacamber I, i993 Page 3 priMerit and Forecast urge a "no" vote on the proposed zoning ordinances. Very truly yours, Aw4x�� Robert Wr Loswan Rn/dk cc: Dawn C. )Honeywell, Seq (via telecopy) 000430 48 riverside county region bkrkia t,J ircushv owxa ion or sour *m cari cna f. December S. 1993 Mayor John Pena 51910 Avenida Navarro La Quint&, CA 92253 Dear Mayor Pena, ,,,O00 W DEC 14 Some weeks ago the City Council created a study group to consider the adoption of a development compatibility regulation as a modification to existing zoning ordinances. That group consisted of staff, two members from the public and members from the build- ing industry as represented by the Building Industry Association (BIA). We were the members appointed to represent the BIA. Several meetings were held by the group, with not much in the way of consensus being achieved. As a result, City staff has pre- pared a draft recommendation for your consideration, on which I would like to comment in behalf of the BIA. The proposal before you' now would affect the entire city and AU future single family residential construction in the R-1, R-2, R- 2a, R-3 and R-V zoning, and goes well beyond the issue of compat- ibility. Some of the proposed items are currently a part of the SR zone, others are modified SR requirements or new altogether. Attached herein is a copy of the draft ordinance as it was presented to our committee. Also attached as exhibits "A" and "B" are detailed responses by the BIA to each of the individual items of the draft proposal. While the material is voluminous, we feel the issues are significant and require our careful consideration. BIA is supportive of all efforts to make the communities in which we build better for all residents. The term better also includes affordability and socially responsible attention to the needs of our constituents. Decisions affecting the entire community will hopefully be made in a reasoned responsible way and not merely as the reaction, and conceivably overreaction to a specific issue or incident of a passing nature. While elected and appointed representatives of a city certainly need to be sensitive to the needs of their constituents, their task should not include trying to create a set of rules that have as their purpose someone's idea of what it takes today to assure recent homebuyers a profit from their purchase decision. Previous administrations in the City of La Quinta have deemed that architectural difference is good. The existing SR zoning ordinance for the Cove area clearly encourages difference as 000431 4333 Orange St.. Ste. 3600. Riverside, CA 92501 ^ _ ^^^ (714) 781-7310 Teiefox # (714) 784915N opposed to sameness. Specifically, section 9.42.080, Building design standards states in part: " B. Architectural Variety. When houses using similar architectural styles are located with(in) two hundred fifty feet of each other, exterior building elevations shall make provision for architectural variety by using different colors, styles, roof treatments, window treatments, garage door treatments, and similar methods." The staff proposal as drafted changes that direction and would put the City in the business of specifically telling builders what they are to build. The proposal before you allows the planning commission to choose which floor plans and how many of each of those plans to be built in AM development. Is it appro- priate for the City to tell Simon Motors what cars they must sell (Cadillacs versus Pontiacs) or Walmart what products they must sell? Might those kind of decisions be better left to someone willing to put their money where their research and judgement dictates? Might the City be taking on some legal and/or economic liability by dictating product mix if their choices are not successful in the marketplace? The marketplace is dynamic. Tastes change, family compositions change, needs change, architectural preferences change. Let us provide an environment that accommodates that inevitable change. Let us not overreact to what is certainly an emotional and difficult situation, but nevertheless a passing one. We appreciate having been invited to be a part of the process and offer the thoughts constructively. We look forward to continued dialogue. &4_e�m4e&cv- Michael Marix Cornerstone Developers, Inc. BIA Representative MM:mm Attachments CC: All Planning Commission members All City Council members Robert Hunt v% Jerry Herman Allan Levin Sunrise Company BIA Representative 000432 50 CITY OF LA QUINTA MEMORANDUM TO: HONORABLE MAYOR AND FELLOW COUNCIL MEMBERS FROM: COUNCIL MEMBER MC CARTNEY DATE: JANUARY 12, 1994 SUBJECT: COMPATIBILITY REGULATIONS I want to offer a concept for your consideration regarding the compatibility standards. This concept does the following three things: I . Protects the homeowners' rights as presented to them; 2. Protects the builder/developer's rights as granted by the City; and, 3. Achieves the City's expectation for the development. The concept is to create development deviations for house sizes based upon the amount of building constructed within a subdivision. This deviation would only pertain to the smallest unit that could be built. Larger houses would be permitted above the largest approved size. A sunset clause of five to seven years would be provided after which the architectural plans approval would expire and any new home development would have to be processed through the normal process. Additionally, if a pre -approved project allowed for house sizes to be less than 1200 square feet, this new ordinance would not allow the house size to be reduced further. The proposed deviations could be as follows: 000433 PERCENTAGE OF BUILDOUT WITHIN AN EXISTING SUBDIVISION PERCENTAGE OF PERMITTED HOUSE SIZE DEVIATIONS FOR ANY FUTURE CONSTRUCTED UNITS 0-20% 20% 21 19 22 18 23 17 24 16 25 15 26 14 27 13 28 12 29 11 30 10 31 9.5 32 9 33 8.5 34 8 35 7.5 36 7 37 6.5 38 6 39 5.5 40 5 41 4.5 42 4 43 3.5 44 3 45 2.5 46 2 47 1.5 48 1 49 0.5 50+ 0 000434 Examples of how this would work is as follows: Example 1: Number of lots: Number of existing homes Existing home sizes: Percentage of buildout: Permitted deviation: Smallest house size: Example 2: Quinterra Number of lots: Number of existing homes Existing home sizes: Percentage of buildout: Permitted deviation: Smallest house size: 100 25 1,150 to 1,800 25 % 0% 1,200 square feet 116 18 2,072 to 2,593 16% 20 % 1,658 square feet I have discussed this concept with the City Attorney. She indicated that it is a viable solution which sets out clear limitations for partially completed projects. Please think about this proposal as I would like to discuss it at the Council meeting on the 18th. If you have any questions, please call. cc: City Manager City Attorney Planning Director 000435 MEMOJH.337 3 o i JAN 8 ; F A.X JANUARY 17, 1994 - -I FAX (909) 396-1571 T0: MR. BOB HENNENGER, PRESIDENT MR. JOHN HUNTER, EXECUTIVE V.P. BUILDING INDUSTRIES ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA DIAMOND BAR, CA TOTAL PAGES: 3 FROM: ROBERT T. TYLER, HOMEOWNER 44-215 VILLETA DRIVE LA QUINTA, CA 92253 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CENSURE OF BIA DESERT COUNCIL THE ATTACHED FAX WAS RECENTLY SENT TO NUMEROUS COUCHELLA VALLEY BUSINESSES BY MR. ED KIBBF.Y, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF THE NEWLY CHARTERED DESERT COUNCIL. BOTH THE INFLAMMATORY CONTENT OF THE FAX AND THE INCITING NATURE OF MR. KIBBEY'S ACTION ARE REPREHENSIBLE. FOR THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS, THE CITY OF LA QUINTA AND ITS RESIDENTS HAVE BEEN STUDYING TWO KEY ISSUES RELATED TO THE FUTURE OF OUR CITY: (1) TO RAISE THE MINIMUM R-1 HOUSE SIZE FROM THE PRESENT 750 SQUARE FEET TO A MORE REALISTIC VALUE; AND (2) TO DRAFT AND ENACT A NEW CITY ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO IN -FILL DEVELOPMENT OF EXISTING, INCOMPLETE TRACTS. BOTH ISSUES AROSE LAST SUMMER WHEN AN OUT-OF-STATE BANK (PRIMERIT OF NEVADA) AND AN OUT -OF -AREA BUILDER (FORECAST CORP. OF RANCHO CUCAMONGA) SOUGHT CITY PERMISSION TO BUILD-OLT THE UPSCALE QUINTERRA TRACT WITH NEW HOUSES THAT WERE ROUGHLY ONE-HALF THE SIZE OF EXISTING HOMES. THAT PROPOSAL TRIGGERED AN EXTENSIVE GRASS -ROOTS MOVEMENT BY CONCERNED LA QUINTA RESIDENTS AND VOTERS, WHO ARE VITALLY INTERESTED IN PRESERVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE FOR WHICH OUR COMMUNITY HAS BECOME FAMOUS, A COMMUNITY COMMITTEE WAS APPOINTED BY THE. CITY TO ASSIST WITH DRAFTING A PROPOSED ORDINANCE. THE MAKE-UP OF THAT COMMITTEE, INCLUDED LA QUINTA RESIDENTS, THE BUILDING INDUSTRY, AND CITY STAFF. THERE HAVE BEEN NUMEROUS PUBLIC HEARINGS ON THESE ISSUES BEFORE THE LA QUINTA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE CITY COUNCIL. THE NEXT PUBLIC HEARING IS JANUARY 18TH, BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL. MR. KIBBEY AND VARIOUS BIA MEMBERS HAVE REGULARLY PARTICIPATED IN THESE HEARINGS. IF THESE HEARINGS HAVE BEEN "PACKED" (TO USE MR. KIBBEY'S WORD) BY LA QUINTA RESIDENTS, IT IS BECAUSE THE CITIZENRY ARE EXERCISING THEIR DEMOCRATIC RIGHT TO ENSURE THAT OUR ELECTED AND APPOINTED CITY OFFICIALS ARE BEING RESPONSIVE TO THEIR CONSTITUENTS WITH REGARD TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF OUR CITY - PARTICULARLY WITH REGARD TO PRESERVING EXISTING COMMUNITY STANDARDS FOR IN -FILL DEVELOPMENTS. QUITE FRANKLY, WE RESENT THE CONSTANT PRESSURE FROM HEAVILY -BIASED OUTSIDERS SUCH AS MR, KIBBEY, THE FORECAST CORP., AND OTHERS WHO ARE ATTEMPTING TO THREATEN OR OTHERWISE INFLUENCE THE ENACTMENT OF "FAVORABLE" LEGISLATION THAT WOULD DEGRADE OUR CITY. HOMES BEING BUILT NOW CREATE A LEGACY FOR OUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN FOR THE NEXT FIFTY YEARS OR SO. WE ARE NOT ABOUT TO ALLOW THAT LEGACY TO BE TARNISHED, JUST TO FULFILL THE NEAR -TERM GOALS OF A FEW SELF-SERVING OUTSIDERS. 000436 I AM VERY CONCERNED TO READ IN MR. KIBBEY'S FAX THAT THE "BIA HAS BEEN BARGAINING WITH THE CITY...." REIATIVE 'TO THESE MATTERS. I CERTAINLY HOPE THAT THF.SF "BARGAINING" SESSIONS, SUCH AS THEIR MEETING WITH THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ON DECEMBER 20, 1993, WAS NOT DONE IN VIOLATION OF STATE LAW WHICH GOVERNS PUBLIC MEETINGS. ALSO, IT IS DIFFICULT TO COMPREHEND JUST HOW THE BIA DESERT COUNCIL (I.E. MR. KIBBEY) CAN POSSIBLY CONSTRUE THEIR HEAVILY -BIASED POSITION AS BEING ONE OF "FAIRNESS TO ..,THE FUTURE HOMEOWNER". ACCORDING TO A RECENT COLUMN IN THE LA 'TIMES, QUOTING MR. GARY HAMBLY, PRESIDENT OF BIA OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, THE CURRENT TREND IS TOWARD LARGER HOUSES "THAT PEOPLE ARE GOING TO GROW INTO AND NOT MERELY INVEST IN TEMPORARILY". THIS BEING THE CASE, WHY IS MR. KIBBEY PUSHING FOR A SMALLER MINIMUM SIZE FOR R-I HOUSING THAN THAT RECOMMENDED BY EITHER THE PLANNING COMMISSION OR THE LOCAL RESIDENTS? SINCE BECOMING A CITY TEN YEARS AGO, LA QUINTA HAS INVESTED HEAVILY TO DEVELOP AN EXCELLENT EDUCATION SYSTEM, INCLUDING A NEW SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL THAT WILI: OPEN NEXT FALL. WE ARE ALSO CONTINUOUSLY IMPROVING OUR INFRASTRUCTURE TO KEEP ABREAST OF COMMUNITY GROWTH. THE CITY IS DEDICATED TO PROVIDING A QUALITY ENVIRONMENT FOR FAMILY LIVING. THIS IS NOT AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING ISSUE. LA QUINTA CURRENTLY HAS AN ABUNDANCE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING. JUST LAST WEEK, THE CITY REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MADE THE DECISION TO ACQUIRE A 36-AGIZE PARCEL IN THE HEART OF OUR CITY FOR ADDITIONAL AFFORDABLE HOUSING PLUS A SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENT COMPLEX. WHAT THIS IS, IS A STRONG DETERMINATION BY THE CITIZENS OF LA QUINTA TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF THE FUTURE DESTINY OF OUR CITY, WITHOUT DELETERIOUS INFLUENCE BY SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS OR INDIVIDUALS. LET'S FACE FACTS: MR.KIBBEY IS A PAID ASSOCIATION EXECUTIVE AND LOBBYIST, WHOSE JOB ULTIMATELY DEPENDS UPON KEEPING HIS BIA MEMBERS GAINFULLY EMPLOYED. THE SIZE AND QUALITY OF NEW HOME CONSTRUCTION PROBABLY MAKES LITTLE DIFFERENCE TO HIM, JUST SO LONG AS THERE IS WORK AVAILABLE. HIS NOT -SO -HIDDEN NEAR -TERM AGENDA IS INCOMPATIBLE WITH THE LONG TERM OBJECTIVES OF THE ESTABLISHED RESIDENTS OF LA QUINTA. HIS BIASED INPUTS ARE NOT APPRECIATED. I CANNOT BELIEVE THAT EITHER THE NAHB OR THE BIA WOULD CONDONE OR ENDORSE THE ACTIONS TAKEN BY MR. KIBBEY VIA HIS FAX. I THEREFORE REQUEST THAT MR. KIBBEY AND THE BIA DESERT COUNCIL BE SEVERELY CENSURED FOR THEIR INAPPROPRIATE ACTIONS TAKEN RELATIVE TO THIS PURELY LOCAL MATTER. I INVITE YOUR THOUGHTFUL CONSIDERATION OF KIBBEY, AND WOULD APPRECIATE THE COURTESY NE�OR TW . ROBERT T. ER BOTH MY FAX AND THE FAX OF MR. OF A RESPONSE FROM YOU WITHIN THE CC: THE EDITOR, THE DESERT SUN (FAX [619] 778-4654) LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL LA QUINTA PLANNING COMMISSION LA QUINTA CITY PLANNING DEPARTMENT 000437 „BEY BIA DESERT CHAPTER O1/14/1994 P,1 acstmt e Cover Sheet WE :'ROM: ED KIBBEY BIA DESERT COUNCIL 619-360-2476 MATE: 01/14/1994 :'umber of Pages: 1 . zzage : 1'.T 7:00 PM TUESDAY, JANUARY 18, THE LA QUINTA CITY COUNCIL WILL HOLD A `1EARING ON AN ORDINANCE WHICH WOULD SET NEW MINIMUM SQUARE FOOT ,INGLE FAMILY HOUSING SIZE IN THE CITY AND SET A MAXIMUM DEVIATION OF !sUILDOUT OF EXISTING DEVELOPMENTS. THE PLANNING COMMISSION .'ECOMMENDED TO THE COUNCIL THAT A TEN PERCENT MAXIMUM DEVIATION )AD A 1300 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM HOUSE BE THE RULE. BIA HAS BEEN BARGAINING WITH THE CITY TRYING FOR A 1200 SQUARE FOOT MINIMUM AND 30 PERCENT DEVIATION. IF YOU HAVE ANY EMPLOYEES LIVING IN LA QUINTA t:R YOU ARE DOING BUSINESS IN THE CITY, IT WOULD BE HELPFUL IF THESE <JLKS COULD ATTEND THE HEARING AND SPEAK, SIMPLY BACKING THE BIA 1)SITI0N OF "FAIRNESS TO THE BUILDER AND THE FUTURE HOMEBUYER” ',�IiO IS UNREPRESENTED IN THIS RULE MAKING. THIS IS A VERY EMOTIONAL "EM TO SOME LA QUINTA RESIDENTS AND THEY ARE EXPECTED TO PACK THE COUNCIL CHAMBERS WITH PERSONS REPRESENTING THEIR WAY OF "'.iINKING, WHICH IS 1500 MINIMUM SQUARE FEET AND NO DEVIATION. IT F)ULD BE NICE IF THE BUILDING INDUSTRY COULD BALANCE THE VISUAL F'FECT ON THE COUNCIL BY DOING SOME OF OUR OWN PACKING. THANKS C)R YOUR HELP. ED KIBBEY "*4 ,facsimile Cover Sheet 000438 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 277-3622 January 12, 1994 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS Mr. Stan Sniff Council Member City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: ZONING ORDINANCE TEXT AMENDMENT #93-039 Dear Mr. Sniff: Stamko Development Co. owns approximately 132 acres of undeveloped R-1 property at the southeast corner of Washington Street and Miles Avenue. Stamko is presently in a deal with Inco Homes Corporation for Inco to purchase from Stamko 300 lots. I have enclosed for your information copies of the following documents relating only to the sub -topics affecting "NEW DEVELOPMENT" in the above -referenced ordinance: 1) December 3, 1993 letter to Jerry Herman with a December 21 1993 letter and enclosures from Steve Kabel, President of Inco Homes - Inland Division addressing minimum square footage as it relates to their feasibility studies, floor plans and sales prices; 2) Steve Kabel's December 17, 1993 memorandum to me setting forth his opinion on the various sub -topics affecting "NEW DEVELOPMENT"; 3) Steve Kabel's December 17, 1993 memorandum to me responding to news article "Once Shunned, the Big House Is Coming Back"; 4) December, 1993 Coachella Valley Housing Market Overview prepared for Inco Homes by Alfred Gobar Associates; and 5) The Meyers Group Housing Market Characteristics and Demographics. 000439 0O439 Mr. Stan Sniff Council Member January 12, 1994 Page 2 I would like to point out some highlights mentioned in the above two feasibility studies: 1) Coachella Valley population is projected to increase by more than 50% to 355,698 in the year 2000 from 230,235 in 1990; 2) The 25 to 54 year old age category has increased from 1980 to 1990 in Coachella Valley while the 55 year old and over age category has decreased; 3) From 1993 to 2000 the projected demand for housing in Coachella Valley is expected to average 6,115 units a year of which 3,545 units are "For -Sale" housing, 1,685 units are apartments and 885 units are mobile homes; 4) Actual sales in Coachella Valley in 1993 matched the "normalized" projections at prices less than $150,000 a unit while sales in the $150,000 to $200,000 price range fell well below the long-term "normalized" projections; 5) Weekly sales for the first six months of 1993 were annualized for detached housing showing that 1993 sales would be 1,706 units for ALL price ranges of which 1,268 units of the 1,706 units would be below the $160,000 price range; 6) Detached single family housing is the most efficient way to exploit the low -end housing market in Coachella Valley in terms of achieved sales; 7) Retirees and second home buyers continue to constitute a source of demand for housing in Coachella Valley along with the non -retired sector; and 8) Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage are becoming a decreasing share of the Coachella Valley's house market as development activity has shifted to the southern part of the Valley, especially La Quinta. The above feasibility studies show that a major portion of the present market segments is first time buyers and empty nesters. As a result, Inco Homes is initially planning to build three different square footage plans . . . 1,250 square feet, 1,550 square feet and 1,850 square feet . . . in the $110,000 to $140,000 price range. The 1,250 square foot plan will entice the first time buyers and empty nesters. Please note that every additional 100 square feet added to a house results in an increased purchase price of $5,000.00. 000440 Mr. Stan Sniff Council Member January 12, 1994 Page 3 The City of La Quinta should consider increasing the present 750 square foot minimum to 1,200 square feet. As an alternative to a 1,200 square foot minimum, the City should consider establishing a 1,400 square foot minimum allowing no more than 25% of an "R-1 zoned project" to have residential houses in the range from 1,100 to 1,400 square feet. I will call you before the January 18th City Council meeting to discuss the sub -topics affecting "NEW DEVELOPMENT". very trIA7, yours, F. CLARKE CFC/lrc Enclosure(s) cc: Steve Kabel, Inco Homes (w/o enc.) - via fax Tom Bienek (w/o enc.) - via fax Carol S. May (w/o enc.) - via fax Peter Kontny (w/o enc.) - via fax 000441 STAMKO DEVELOPMENT CO. 10100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 277-3622 December 3, 1993 VIA FAX Mr. Jerry Herman Director of Planning & Development City of La Quinta P.O. Box 1504 78-105 Calle Estado La Quinta, CA 92253 RE: PROPOSED MINIMUM SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED HOUSING IN R-1 ZONES Dear Jerry: As you are aware, Stamko Development Co., a California Limited Partnership (Stamko), is the owner of 132 acres east of Washington Street, south of Miles Avenue and west of Adams Street which contains 300 lots of R-1 zoning. Stamko is presently in a deal with Inco Homes Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (Inco) for Inco to purchase from Stamko the 300 lots. Inco had feasibility studies prepared on the 300 lots. These feasibility studies showed that the 300 lots should be developed into a 1,200 to 1,800 square foot residential housing project. This footage requirement results in base sales prices of $110,000.00 to $140100o.00. Enclosed is a copy of a December 2, 1993 letter with enclosures to me from Steve Kabel, President of Inco Homes - Inland Division, addressing the minimum square footage as it relates to their feasibility studies, floor plans and sales prices. The City of La Quinta is presently considering a new minimum square footage requirement for single family detached housing in the R-1 zones. A major portion of the present market segments is first time buyers and empty nesters which has resulted in the down sizing of the houses in order to accommodate these buyer's income. As a result, Inco's feasibility studies reflect three different square footage uses which consist of 1,250 square feet, 1,550 square feet and 1,800 square feet. The 1,250 square foot plan will entice this major portion of the market segment of first time buyers and empty nesters. 00044? Mr. Jerry Herman December 3, 1993 Page 2 In order to set a citywide square foot minimum for the R-1 zone, the City of La Quinta MUST CONSIDER that the R-1 zoning north of the Whitewater Storm Channel (Channel) east of Washington Street south of Fred Waring and west of Jefferson Street can presently only accommodate 11200 to 1,800 square foot residential houses. The 1,200 square foot house would have a base sales price of approximately $110,000.00. Please note that every additional 100 square feet added to a house results in an increased purchase price of $5,000.00. Therefore, your 1,800 square foot house would have a sales price of approximately $140,000.00. The City of La Quinta should consider increasing the present 750 square foot minimum to 1,200 square feet. As an alternative to a 1,200 square foot minimum, the City could also consider establishing a 1,400 square foot minimum allowing no more than 25% of an 11R-1 zoned project" to have residential houses in the range from 1,100 to 1,400 square feet. If you have any questions, please call me. Very 'ly yours, C NE F. CLARKE CFC/lrc Enclosure(s) cc: Steve Kabel, Inco Homes (w/o enc.) - via fax Tom Bienek (w/enc.) - via fax Carol S. May (w/enc.) - via fax Peter Kontny (w/o enc.) 000443 ;)EC 02 '93 39:55AM -NCO HOMES P.2 -INCO 1 December 2, 1993 I Christine P. Clarke Stamko Development Company _o100 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 Dear Chris: i am hopeful that this transmittal will assist the city Planning Director in arriving at a reasonable recommendation regarding the minimum 'liveable floor area for single family detached housing in the City of La Quinta. First, per the attached floor plans and elevations, ranging is floor area size from 1,129 sq. ft. = nearly 1,400 sq. ft., it should be noted that (1) the functionality of the floor plan varies only by room count, and (2) by the architectural appearance of the exterior of the home you cannot distinguish if the home is a 1,000 sq. ft. or 1,400 sq. ft. in area. With respect to functionality, the variation occurs primarily in bedroorr. court and the tyVical addition of a family room as the plan gains floor area. By limiting the minimum tloor area to a 1,400 sq. ft., T- am concerned that we have excluded a great portion of two market segments; Namely, the entry-level buyer and the empty nester. Both of these market segments rely on affordable pricing and are not as concerned if the home contains 3 or 4 bedrooms. our in-depth evaluation of the market, assisted by two ',.ndependent market research companies and one nationally -recognized demographer, concludes that the denial of minimum floor areas in the range of 1,100 to 1,200 sq. ft. and the establishment of a mininum floor area of 1,400 sq. £t. would effectively increase the most affordable -priced home by $1C,000 to S15,000. The effects of such higher pricing on prospective homebuyers include: (1) a required 10� greater cash down payment; and (2) a required _0V greater gross annual household earnings for loan qualification. Both of these effects have a deleterious impact the i first-time buyer and the empty -nester with fixed income. The City should give careful thought to 'looking beyond the selection of an arbitrary minimum floor area and provide kind consideration for those seeking homeownership for the first time as well as those empty -nesters, with economic limitations, desirous of retiring in the community of La Quinta. i gin erel , I m land Division v e President *t Hi6h Desert Div,sion 3911 Park Avenue, Suite 210 VictorAle. CA 92392 (e19)241-5151 FAX (619) 241.5822 Corporate Office W. Arrow H'ghway P 0. O- Box 970 Uolartd, CA 91785 (909)981.8989 FAX (909) 982-9784 000444. DEC a2 =3 a9:ESAM :NCO .TOMES KITCHEN--" OrY70r�. 1 RR. i YtrarL.W mydS7dNr� &WE joit ` DINING LIVING C��!,p. t7 YOL'JMf :i7Lir6 Added Elegance I i--9 jj w t,1u otvntaed ZC42r Gamge 1,CAR GARAGE A ENTRY MASTER BEDROOM EAU i BEDROOM 3 /DEN Derr OFnion ForBuilt•In FWdbitfty i,129 sq. Lt. P.3 J JCD c-slitMasurSLdo WPtb M LATH LaW Kbrdrobe BEDROOMS 000445 .93 saaM :r;cc COMES P.a ii t 0 1944., 'I'd I mil, I �f W �1J1•"1 L _ _ _'_ J ra■n , a i I 0■T10■NL n■■rr,j■■ I� I BARTER BEDROOM BAM!�Y LIV1N0 Ni"=zal BATH Large Kitchen/ i � 21 /� Y Famfly&omJi2r rowla aal■a Cm"fortaote HALL BEDROOM 2 Family Lung i KITCHEN • DININO I Fl1bQ�mgarllt Dining F DA00[ BEDROOM I 21CAE GARAGE I • I i I i 1,325 e4. ft. LL' � Affd" lihUtrUiON Double-DoorEany L -Lij4 ( NABTER BEDROOM MASTER SATE 1smmL— OPTIONAL E6TRIAT pptx)Vkal Retmas Ana —Tgp,gPrjod 4�daulay 1 :G•,i� .tip/•- t ✓�M� 000448 Fj 0 S L M tr C N m n DEC 17 '93 04:40PM :NCO HOMES NOO HOMES Inlay d Divijim TO: Christie Clarke FROM: Steve 4bel DATE' Deoea}ber 170 1993 SUBJECT: City of ILa Quints - Ordinance . P.2 I have reviewed the Planning and Development Department Memorandum to the Panning Commission, dated December 14, 1993, regarding the above captioned topic. The killowing co=ents set forth, my opinion regarding theivarious subtopics involved with the particular "tier: 1, Minimum Heuk�e 4�n I i I concur with the BIA proposal of 1,200 sq.! ft.: however, the STAMKO proposal has merit as it allows the typical percentage of a plan mix to �ccur below a proposed minimum of 1,400 sq. #t. 2. Rat} nnm1y The "Recommended Change" is acceptable. i i I 3. A c .as hatUZj bmise nd rage- Further discussion should occur relative to tl le use of a door exiting out of a garage onto a covered porch leading into the entry of the home --without the use of an enclosed wall area. 4. Meehani'cal and rel—ited eQuipmentl I concur with the BIA proposal. $. T andaia�z I concur with the BIA recommendation t standard and, if adot, adopted as a requiremen and irrigation material. o study the cost of adding front yard I mdscaping as a what should the landscaping include in terms of plant i i 6. SC[tsni.Og- I concur with the B�A, recommendation. 7. leg- I concur with the BIA recommendation. Some communities have required block or masonTj walls connecting the homes, but not along the common side and rear property lines. I � I iza:wm� � r v=mu,�cAsuH cen) eli.hes 000450 DEC 1? '93 04:40PM INCO HOMES P•3 December 17,1993 g, Rv+ rinr Ma w�igljt• I concur with the 9U recommendation. Tho market dictates the acceptability of exterior �aterials and should continue to do so rather than through legislation which typically fails to keep pace with trends in the market. i 9. EML i I concur with the BIA recommendation. 10. 151111CHna more• i II Both new and existing residential structures should come under the same level of scrutiny. i With respect to the balance of the material it relates to the compatibility of new resideiices in partially developed subdivisions and not to our proposed new development. i 000451_ DEC 1-7 193 05:12PM ?NCO HOMES P.2 INCO HOMES Inland Division TO. Christine Clarke FROM: Steve Kabel DATE: December 179 1993 SUBJECr.- Response to News Article "Once Shunned, the 'Big House' Is Bach' First, it should be noted that of the thirteen communities we are developing, only two have; the "Big House" concept incorporated therein. This v important to recognize that the! concept only works in specifc locations and based on the demographics of the marketi region. j The "Big House" concept is appears to be successful in markets which reach buyers currently; residing in urbanized regions (i.e., Los Angeles, Orange and San Diego Counties). The attraction to the "Big House" is typically from the young professional. white collar worker and household. This buyer is quite often renting an apartment or an attached' condominium/townhouse at a high monthly rent. They are typically unable to acquire an available large new home in their submarket due to its high sales price. The 'Big House" , concept requires them to commute a short distance and qualify to purchase a large/spacious but less amenitized home. The mortgage they will pay under the "Big House" concept, from an after tax benefit standpoint, is nearly equivalent to their Currently monthly rent. Again, the concept is based on demographics and appears to work only in areas where your target market is the more affluent young professional household seeking their first home. The demographics for the La Quinta submarket direct us toward targeting the needs of another form of entry level market: namely, the service sector and blue collar worker. As a result of the current and forecasted growth of commerce and service -oriented businesses in the market, and the level of monthly rents incurred (which are significantly lower than the urbanized areas of L.A. and Orange Counties), you can see that the buyer profile is different than that for the "Big House" concept, I hope this answers your inquiry regarding how we target our product to the intended buyer --which is further supported by the demographic studies conducted for each market. LM wet Army. W&M vPM&cAnM 00045' SATURDAY, December 11, 1993 'sohn Hussar, Real Estate Editor: 778-4647 California i M trends 1 ` Bradley Inman More buyers purchasing big homes The stripped -down, small house that many real estate ex- perts expected to be the stan- dard for the 1990s in California may be giving way to a larger house. There are signs that low- er interest rates and larger fam- ilies are motivating many households to find and purchase bigger homes. j Even California first-time home buyers, who in the past have been strapped getting into the real estate market at all, are finding they can buy more house because of falling mortgage rates and because of new house plans that boast both size and value. Several developers are producing an entirely new line of entry-level homes that are more spacious but still modest in style and that are affordable. For example, developer Ira Norris is producing three new models from 1,887 square feet to 3,010 square feet in the Southern California community of Mur- rieta that are priced from $132,990 to $168,990. Houses of that size are usually built to meet the demand of monied move -up home buyers but be- cause of the price and low inter- est rates half of the new home- owners are first-time buyers, according to Norris, who is chairman and president of INCO Homes of Upland. Los Angeles -based Kaufman & Broad Home Corp. will soon be introducing its "big -value" home in 12 locations across Cali- fornia with floor sizes up to . 2,500 square feet. "We aren't in- creasing the number of bed- rooms but just making every- thing bigger," -said Kaufman & - Broad Vice President Eric Elder. -- zne—mwstry watches Kauf- man & Broad and INCO closely because in the late 1980s the two firms bucked industry trends by pioneering low-cost starter homes at a time when most builders were building expen- sive, move -up houses. When tl* market turned in the early 1990s and big homes were out of favor, the two companies did well with their stripped -down, entry-level homes with an average size of only 1,100 to 1,500 square feet. It wasn't long before most other builders began to jump into the entry-level market with a more modest floor plan. Norris is quick to point out that his larger home models aren't a return to the gold-plat- ed, move -up houses of the 1980s. But he is using size to distinguish INCO in the crowded entry-level market. His three models are marketed as the "big, bigger and biggest" house. This (bigger model) isn't in lieu of the entry-level market, it's a segment of it," Elder said. He expects some of the buyers to be moving -up from a condo or townhome, knowing exactly Ij what size and type of house they want next. "Everybody likes space if they can get it and they can afford it," said Mitchell Rouda, editor and chief, Builder Maga- zine, Washington, D.C. As the baby boom population has chil- dren, they require more space, consequently "we have never seen such a need for family housing," he said. Santa Barbara architect Bar- ry Berkus agrees that families are the motivation for "blowing up these small houses." And there is a specific plan for where the space is being added: bigger bedrooms for the children. Another trend with the larger homes is a more flexible floor plan. Now even in mass-produced subdivisions "buyers can sit down before a computer and ac- tually choose where walls will be and how rooms will be config- ured," Berkus said. This trend toward customizing homes in large subdivisions is made possi- ble with computer -designed home construction techniques. Inman writes this column for a number of California newspa- i 1� jre. It a -..arm -n'�aturda -s. 000453 an T H E M E Y E R S GROUP Information Services Consultatioir Services Competitive • QLlanerl% nc\s home survey Residential • %larNet uppor-tunit% anal sis Housing • k data via primarc research Consulting • Land aquisition consultation Market • \arranve eXCCtltl'e summaries • Absorption studies Report • Comprehensive project data • Pricing anal sk (CHMR) • Sales actin iiy/summary tables • Feasibility analysis • Hume buyer protiles • \taster plan strategies • Active de%elopers list • NIaiti-famiI% feasibility • Condo con%ersiun analsis Executive • Ouaneris publication • Floor pi in rep ie,.v and critique Summary • CHMR executive summaries • Financial loan packaging Review for all six So. Calif. counties • Disposition strategies and Las Vegas • Ponfo;io analysis • Total So. Calif. overview and trends Commercial/ • Retail demand analysis Best • Ouanerh publication Industrial • Highest and best use anal\sis Selling • `0 best ,erring projects in So. C:'fit. Consulting • Dcmujr iphic projections Projects • Top to attached and detached • Laud acquisition feasibility project, in each county of So. Calif. • PrrdLC' 1?I:uulims and esaluation .,, LasVe,,as • Absorption anal%.is • Detailed CII\IR survey data -beets • Lease up p-o-f"tions • Land saie strategies Competitive • CHMR sales data on disk Housing • Menu driven Market • On -screen quern Marketing • l ar.'et n„ trket ;;n:;'s as Program • \1'.Iltinle selecting and sonic Strategies •'•Llr etin_cunlpw_ns • Pse^.Urt printing . ir.:.. .. h;r,._ra fTt, • t'e t0 :• ,•!'. e::ill"_ i:;aCL'::'• • StLilld ail':': pro -rani • .. 'l'. 11i Irh' .til, Forecast ,nnual ; ublicaul',:i Consumer • E.xi; ,:.r•.:. • and • dousing market ::ticitc attitude Vt':r _ r,;a_ sunr�• Review • Inventor.\ trends Surveys . \:.. .,at::, i�, met •+rc„Iuct .:n;dv,;, • Re:ent market hi_itliglth • I'rrr,":a pn,ject unuutms • Gro%Wi projections , , , ..:. nruduet ;rccernulce • t;.lser ;Mile sur%c%s Real Estate • Pmposed:actively selling iar_e- • Focus _coups Information talc housing de%e!opmenls Aerials • Cuninierciai/industrial zoning • E.\kting and proposed frce�c.lss • City and counh h,Alild:rriCS Los Arreles Ventura Counties i;-,Co niura Surt� 61 a Enc;rc: CA 91436 f8t6i501-8905 FAX 9181501-3984 INFORMATION YOU CAN, BUILD ON Orange County inland Empire 400 So Ramcra Suite 202 Corona, CA 91719 (714)-35.3760 FAX (714)735-3760 San Diego' Imperial Counties 12770 H oh •`.fluff Dr. Sete 160 San Diego. CA 92130 (619) 792.72 7 2 FAX (619) 792-9610 Las Vegas. ;lark County Hughes Ceder 3753 Ho'nard H..ghes FKy Second Floor Las Vegas NV 89109 -02) 892-3790 FAX (702) 892 3990 Executive Offices 3991 DdacAnhur Blvd Suite 320 Newport Beacn, CA 92660 (714) 660-6160 FAX (714) 660-6166 00045- V. HOUSING MARKET CHARACTERISTICS 00045 EXHIBIT IV-2 CV = cn cn cn N Q CD L1 Z C3 W o CD 1--1 H M[1�Z cr- a. CD == CDC7�f=�J U Q Q O G¢D Q O En Z O O = CD rrGN 2 1 Cl Q CD S CT Q1 O „y U v O a� o O u cn c M u fa I do j w 1 40 go Y 41 Qf O 07 o O M w C o dQ'.c`b �.4f-0 ate`.4LD ❑ ❑ e do In O O Co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o CD.O O O C; cu m a "000456 C> EXHIBIT IV-1 C) Q LO H Z LD Z H W C17 cr- = O d O W N p Q O Q Q7 Z W H � O .J d m LU Z O H H Q J a O d r- H OQQ � O Z J 0 CL � ¢O d (� CAD i O 1 O Ci .y O n .r O n rn 0 rn 0 rn 0 rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$ $ o0 0 0 o a cPu CMO Z :n = m W ¢ 000457 EXHIBIT V-1 0 uj rLn En rn cn ccn w CD Z CD ena) �_ CD Q F— O F-- li o u ¢ x co ac 0 rii ~ cu < cmro * , ♦` N m co ............ . • • : • • .. .. to _. IN m o� ....:....:....... ...... ..co .. ,�.�.. ................. ..... . cl . . . . . . . . . . N Qnf . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ♦• T O O O O O O O O 1CD OO �yOO O O Cl f'1 N N w O In 7. e^ 000453 IV. DEMOGRAPHICS 000459 EXHIBIT 11-9 HOUSING TENURE COACHEL.L A VALLEY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1980 AND 1990 THE MEYERS GROUP f:\w\rstudykv%hhtxls 1980 CENSUS 1990 CENSUS TENURE Number % Of Total Number % Of Total COACHELLA VALLEY OWNER OCCUPIED RENTER OCCUPIED TOTAL OCCUPIED VACANT 1/ TOTAL HOUSING UNITS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA OWNER OCCUPIED RENTER OCCUPIED TOTAL OCCUPIED VACANT 1/ TOTAL HOUSING UNITS 34,158 41.1% 17,996 21.7% 52,154 62.8% 30,900 37.2% 83,054 100.0% 54,334 41.1% 32,536 24.6% 96,970 65.7% 45,419 34.3% 132,290 100.0% 2,599,740 50.5% 3,119,656 50.0°/. 2,212,789 43.0% 2,664,196 42.7% 4,811,529 100.0% 5,793,842 100.0% 334,491 6.5% 455,470 7.3% 5,146,020 100.00/0 6,239,312 100.00/0 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: LENGTH OF TIME IN UNIT Owner Renter 1985 to 1990 22.5% 35.9% 1980 to 1984 7.5% 5.4% 1970 to 1979 13.0% 3.7% 1960 to 1969 6.3% 0.8% Prior to 1959 4.6% 0.3% 53.9% 46.1% SOURCE: 1980 and 1990 U.S Census, Urban Decision Systems 000460 I/ Includes for -sale, for -rent, those held for occasional use, seasonal vacancies and boarded up units EXFIIBTf II-6 AGE DISTRMUTION OF THE POPULATION COACHELL LA VALLEY AND SOUTHMN CALIFORNIA 1980 AND 1990 THE I%MYERS GROUP f:\w\wraliM 96hadxls Avg. Compounded AREA/ % % Annual Annual Growth AGE RANGES 1980 Total 1990 Total Change 1990-1990 COACHELLA VALLEY 0-5 10,951 8.2% 21,947 9.5% 1,100 10.0% 6 - 13 13,935 10.5% 24,962 10.8% 1,103 7.9% 14 - 17 7,793 5.9% 10,815 4.7% 303 3.95A :.:r}:. ....»: y}a: :hz<xn»,. ::.n: s;zrv:: aYYik:iz)Y's`.:h�:.,r ::.:rhw:::.::...... :..:ac:�:.:.. .J:v,..:a.::. .rw•.?�;:yp. x. n. b:� 18 - 20 6,201 4.7% 8,957 3.90/9 276 4.4% 21 - 24 8,599 6.5% 13,336 5.8% 474 5.5% ;4a„ 22 293 9"T°!i v .;'749'w "ti �•I z ,1t 25 - 34 18,542 13.9/° ° 38,144 16.6% 1,960 10.6% 35-44 12,661 9.5% 28,618 12.4% 1,596 12.6% 45 - 54 13,262 10.0% 20,525 8.90/s 726 5.5% �- .:..:. k...,....'JJa . :...,,.w :.... .�ww:..::....Xwva,aa,.:a .rw.r :....,: 55 - 64 ,.. 17,485 ....... .. ..... 13.1% ... 22,363 .....rv. 9.7% ... 489 2.8% 65+ 23,622 17.8% 40,567 17.6% 1,695 7.2% Total 133,040 100.0% Median Age 35.4 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 230,234 100.0% 9,719 7.3% 34.2 0-5 1,168,853 8.7% 1,527,232 9.6% 35,838 3.1% 6 - 13 1,577,485 11.8% 1,924,986 12.1% 34,750 2.2% 14 -17 905,698 6.8% 887,723 5.6% -1,797 -0.2% Sus 68 79Z I,9�r 18 - 20 794,999 5.9% 830,266 5.2% 4,537 0.6% 21-24 1,093,275 8.2% 1,190,9129 .5r% 0.9% zOl.9s 27 49.,736025 : , - 34 2,373,158 .. .. 17.9% 3,377,199 .1. 21.2% ..r .r.1. 100,403 4.2% 35-44 1,578,596 11.8% 2,580,466 16.2% 100,187 6.3% 45 - 54 1,332,626 10.0% 1,650,280 10.3% 31,765 2.4% Sisb !Dial " ry St284 38Q' 79 696 Mp.. No. 47 ?'!a 232,...... 55-64 1,217,578 9.1% 1,235,568 7.70/a 1,799 0.1% 65+ 1,327,256 9.9% 1,687,738 10.6% 36,048 2.7% Subto3al 2,544,834! i9.d°l ` 2,923.3U6 18.3% 37,847 ":}3.35=. Total 13,359,414 100.0% 15,949,909 100.0% 259,050 1.9% Median Age 29.6 30.8 00046t enfmf-c. 100n .,..a 100n TT C 11,,.,,..- r,a,,,,, C..,......_ EXHIBIT H-5 pOPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD GROWTH TRENDS COACHELLA VALLEY 1980 TO 2000 THE N EYER.S GROUP f:\wVoa 1&"96hphxls AREA 1990 1990 2000 COACHELLA VALLEY 1/ Population 133,060 230,235 353,692 Total Numerical Change 97,173 125.463 Total Percent Change 73.0% 54.5% A-1 Numerical Change .. 9,718 12,546 Cornpounded Annual Change 7.3% 3.4% Households 52,154 96,970 131,740 Total Numerical Change 34,716 44,870 Total Perxo<Change .. 66.6% 51.7% Annual Nurnreriol Change 3,472 4.437 Compounded Annual Change 6.7% 5.2% Average Household Size 2.52 2.62 2.70 SOMIERN CALIFORNIA 2/ Population 13,301,470 16,919,563 20,470,002 Total Numerical Change 3.619,095 3,550,437 Total Percent Change 27.2% 21.0% Annual Numerical Change 361,210 355,044 Compounded Annual Change 2.7% 2.1% Households 4.759,046 5,742.130 698600 Total Numerical Change 1,230,645 1,211.753 Total Percent Change 25.9% 21.1% Annual Numerical Change 123,064 121,175 Compounded Annual Change 2.6% 2.1% Average Household Size 2.79 2.95 2.93 Total Southern Califomia population 13,434,530 17,149,900 20,t25,700 Total Southern California households 4,911,200 5,829,000 7,118,600 Coachella Valley %Capture: Population 0.996A 1.34% 1.71% Coachella Valley%Capture: Households 1.080A 1.49% 1.95% Annual Southern California population growth 371,527 367,590 Annual Southcm California household growth 126.536 125,662 C41chella Valley %Capture: Population 2.62% 3.41% (Coachella Valley %Capture: Households 2.74% 3.57% I/ Coachella Valley 2000 projection from Southern California Association of Govmurcnu (SCAG) 2/ Southem California numbers exclude Coachella Valley population/households SOURCE: Urban Decision Syd m; 20M projection by California Departn►st of Finance 000462 ±5 t2!) 2§2\IIII§ §| f���(9f1 8 8 {| [CNly § 77} §f, !ƒ! - : } \ A ( ■ ( § § b / § 7§§55§5555! _ f$e-• -aa}e#S . ( . - � _ «� m fir!§i■!!( #!rA<<■�r #!rA<<■�r ! � �,■,■;�;a S 7a��§§m ) 2 � A § ■ ` ©$ � ( k \ k 000463 EXHIBIT II-7 INCOME DISTRIBUTION BY HOUSEHOLD COACHELLA VALLEY AND SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1980 TO 1990 THE MEYERS GROUP f:\wksaAy\x v%hhi.xls 1980-1990 1990 CENSUS 1990 CENSUS Annual Growth ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME Number %Total Number %ToW Number Percer COACHELLA VALLEY S5,000 - S9,999 9.337 17.9% 9,297 9.7% :: rc; :.».:,..:,..:::.:...•.•;...n:.w,.rc»:.::::.:..... .;,:a::n:: :..,a:.:..:.:.:.:.:.a::; r.:.r..: r¢,;: ::`:::.:;S:z :: :;.:.:v::;: :��:%:,.:,::: ;%.:..;:.:,.n:.:...n...•.:....:..:<.,..: ;...,y 515,000 - S 1919" 7,010 13.4% 9,770 11.4% 520,400 S�4;p99 S,d. .. 4gc' 5;31>1 4W ' S25,000 - S29,999 3,999 7.6% 6,964 8.1% i 530,000 1,99G 374y: SRK •194;99�.m,:...n;.�,• ..::...::.. ..»rc.»w.��.:,.a S35,000 - S39,999 1,991 3.8% 4,662 5.4% 43YO 7802 . n....k,.,,,..,M,,.m gSy°.:s S50,000 - S74,999 2,054 3.9% 10,941 12.7% ... ..:.. .. .. APR"..iq,999 ....f :. '.... 737......::.. S100,000+ 1.059 2.0% 4,825 5.6% 52,154 83,581 Median Household Income S15,966 S26,236 Average Household Income S23,370 S40,204 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA l eat tban SS,�DQ ,. 349,443 $5.000 - S9,999 707,683 14.7 /. 419.710 7.2% t124Z3 ...':1. .. i46% "' 4i3,b 76..n... S15,000-s19,999 636,951 13.2% 420.312 7.3% .... $25.000 - S29,999 446,187 9.3% 420.620 7.3% S30,000 S34y99 340,777 ,,,;,.' a ;: 425,Z84Al $35,000 - S39,999 239,999 5.0% 377,940 6.5% :... ,. Sa0000 S49,999 Z78940 38°!a. S50,000 - S74,999 219,595 4 6% 1,077,762 18.6% „_ i03672 , 42Ys,,;, 893.a84 .n ;34'Yi„ ; 4,811,190 5,789,119 Median Household Income S 18,290 Average Household Income S22,778 $36,439 S47,532 .29,897 -4.1% r. -21,664 .3.4% l3672 nw:::n ,2:a%. -2.557 -0.6% 4,431.:.n 13,905 5.8% 85,817 39.1% 7394E 761%> SOURCE: 1980 and 1990 U.S. Census 000464 COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING MARKET OVERVIEW Prepared For: INCO HOMES December 1993 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES 721 Kimberly Avenue, Placentia, GA 92670-6300 (714) 524-1000 FAX (714) 524-0149 000465 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER PAGE IINTRODUCTION............................................................. II SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS ...................................... III COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING MARKET OVERVIEW ........ Growth Dynamics...................................................... Second Home Market .................................................. Demand Structure Housing Market Elements ...................... Current Market Conditions ........................................... IV LONG-TERM PROJECTIONS ............................................. EXHIBIT III-1 Residential Building Permit Trends Total Coachella Valley Area ................................................. III-2 Housing Profile: 1990 Coachella Valley, California ................................................. III-3 Coachella Valley Area Boundaries Map .................................... III-4 Residential Building Permit Trends for the Coachella Valley (Number of Units Excluding Mobile Homes) ............................. III-5 Residential Building Permit Trends for the Coachella Valley (Valuation in Thousands of Dollars Excluding Mobile Homes) ........ III-6 Units Authorized by Permit as a Percent of All Units Authorized, Coachella Valley, California .................................. III-7 Overall Housing Demand Elements at Average Growth in Demand of 6,115 Units a Year ................................. III-8 Composition of Market at Average Annual Demand of 6,115 Units a Year ......................................................... III-9 Supply and Demand - Total Residential Units and Total Residential Value Coachella Valley, California ................................................. 1 14 5 8 12 13 M., 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 000466 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBIT PAGE III-10 Supply and Demand - Single Family Units and Single Family Value 26 Coachella Valley, California ................................................. III-11 Supply and Demand - Multi -Family Units and Multi -Family Value 27 Coachella Valley, California ................................................. III-12 Supply and Demand Index - Total Residential Units and Total Residential Value 28 Coachella Valley, California ................................................. III-13 Supply and Demand Index - Single Family Units and Single Family Value 29 Coachella Valley, California ...................................... III-14 Supply and Demand Index - Multi -Family Units and Multi -Family Value Index 30 Coachella Valley, California ................................. ................ III-15 Nonresidential Building Permit Trends 31 Coachella Valley, California ....................... III-16 Nonagricultural Wage and Salary Employment Trends 32 Coachella Valley, California ............................... III-17 Riverside -San Bernardino, California PMSA 33 Employment Estimates, 1980-1992 ............... III-18 Distribution of Nonagricultural Employment By Industry, 1992 34 Coachella Valley, California ........................... III-19 Change in Nonagricultural Wage and Salary Employment 35 Coachella Valley, California ................................... III-20 Most Recent Changes in Employment and Housing Development Patterns, Coachella Valley, California ..................... 36 III-21 Median Housing Value Index Versus AGA Housing Demand Index 37 _ Coachella Valley, California ................................................. IV-1 Map of Detached Projects Surveyed July 1993 44 Coachella Valley ................................... ii 00046'7 ALFRED GOSAR ASSOCIATES TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBIT PAGE IV-2 Residential Project Summary Single Family Detached, July 1993 45 CoachellaValley .............................................. IV-3 Residential Floor Plan Summary Characteristics of Faster Selling Floor Plans Versus Slower Selling Floor Plans Single Family Detached, July 1993 Coachella Valley............................................................... 47 IV-4 Map of Attached Projects Surveyed July 1993 51 CoachellaValley .............................................. IV-5 Residential Project Summary Townhome/Condominium, July 1993 Coachella Valle ........*.....••••-•••• "" 52 IV-6 Residential Floor Plan Summary Characteristics of Faster Selling Floor Plans Versus Slower Selling Floor Plans Townhome/Condominium, July 1993 53 CoachellaValley............................................................... iii 00046.8 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of Coachella Valley's housing market in terms of its structure, sources of demand, and the probable scale of the market likely to be associated with economic recovery. Methodologies employed in the preparation of this report included updating a mathematical simulation of Coachella Valley's economy and housing market has been maintained by the Consultants for approximately 20 years. The statistical data is supplemented with information from The Meyers Group regarding the pattern of new home sales in Coachella Valley during the first six months of 1993. This report was prepared on the basis of secondary data and involved no independent field data collection by the Consultants. 1 0004699 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES CHAPTER II SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS I. Coachella Valley's housing market responds to three distinct sources of demand - permanent residents that are part of the local economy, permanents residents that are retirees, and the second home market. 'Over the long run, Coachella Valley's housing market has been characterized by substantial volatility. Much of the volatility, however, is a function of a pronounced building cycle in which developers periodically over -respond to demand. The demand side of the market equation for Coachella Valley has been considerably more stable than the supply side historically. 2. The focus of development activity in Coachella Valley has shifted from the Palm Springs area to the southern portions of the Valley, especially to La Quinta. _. 3. Based on 1992 building permit data, the areas in which low-cost single family housing has been most predominant include the Cities of Coachella, Indio, Desert Hot Springs, and (somewhat surprisingly) La Quinta, as well as the unincorporated portions of Coachella Valley. 4. From 1993 to the Year 2000, demand for housing in Coachella Valley is expected to average about 6,115 units a year, of which 885 units are expected to be mobile homes - a market for 5,230 stick -built units per year on average. Of this total, 3,545 units are expected to be for -sale housing and 1,685 units apartments. 5. The specific indices of the economy and housing market in Coachella Valley peaked in 1990 and are still declining. Employment data through July 1993, however, suggest that job loss in Coachella Valley has diminished almost to 2 000470 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES zero, indicative of the potential for the local economy to have reached bottom, setting the stage for some recovery. 6. Throughout the recession, however, housing sales have continued in Coachella Valley, partly because of the Del Webb project. Retirees and second home buyers continue to constitute a source of demand for housing in this market, as does some inertia in the primary, non -retired sector of the support base for Coachella Valley's housing market. If housing prices in Coachella Valley behave in a typical manner during recovery, prices will continue to be at current levels or decline slightly for a year to two years into the recovery - assuming recovery is currently underway. 7. A cross -sectional analysis of sales rates at condominium and tract projects on the market in mid-1993 indicates that annualized sales of stick -built housing in Coachella Valley currently are at a rate of 2,180 units a year (+2,200 units a year). The "normalized" projections of absorption potential on an average annual basis between 1993 and the Year 2000 are a level of about 3,545 stick - built for -sale homes per year. Current sales are approximately 61.4 percent of the projected average annual potential. Throughout Southern California, new home sales are running at about 60.0 to 65.0 percent of average annual change in owner occupancy of housing in Southern California between 1980 and 1990. Actual sales in Coachella Valley in 1993 matched the "normalized" projections at prices less than $150,000 a unit. The major decline in sales from the long- term expected average has occurred at prices over $275,000 a unit - especially at prices over $300,000 a unit. Actual sales in the $250,000 to $275,000 price range are (surprisingly) consistent with the long-term projections. Sales in the $150,000 to $200,000 price range fall well below the Ion; -term "normalized" projections. 3 000471_ ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES 8. hieving acceptable sales rates per floor plan Most of the attached units that are ac or acceptable aggregate levels of sales are priced over $130,000 a unit - resort housing catering to second home buyers. Detached single family housing is the _ most efficient way to exploit the low -end housing market in Coachella Valley in terms of achieved sales. In areas where land cost is not a major factor, detached housing is almost always preferable to. attached housing for mainstream buyers as distinct from purchasers of second homes in a resort environment. 9. The economic statistics support the hypothesis that Coachella Valley's housing market should improve over the next two to three years barring any major national economic dislocation. The decline in employment in Coachella Valley during the first six months of 1993 (145 jobs) was less than 10.0 percent as great as the decline in employment over the same period of 1992, as shown below: y 1992 1993 January - April 61 1,114 April - July -1.900 -1.259 Total -1,839 -145 Despite the weak economy, low-priced housing (under $150,000 a unit) in Coachella Valley has been selling at rates consistent with the "normalized" long-term projection of absorption potential in these price ranges. This segment of the market in Coachella Valley may, therefore, be larger than the statistical projections indicate. Throughout Southern California, however, low-priced product has sold relatively well through the recession, exploiting the reservoir of pent-up demand for ownership evident in Southern California as defined by the 1990 Census information. 4 00047ti ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES CHAPTER III COACHELLA VALLEY HOUSING MARKET OVERVIEW Coachella Valley's housing market is unique in the Inland Empire because of the following factors: 1. It has not historically been supported to any significant degree by residents of this area who commute to job centers in Los Angeles and Orange County - unlike the case with many other local housing markets in the Inland Empire. 2. Housing demand in Coachella Valley is derivative of three largely independent types of consumers - mainstream households involved in the local economy (which is driven by tourists and visitors); retirees attracted to Coachella Valley because of its resort environment (some of whom may also own other homes for summer use); and development of real estate product for nonresident visitors - second homes, and pre -retirement homes. 3. A concomitant of its excellent winter climate is its less hospitable summertime climate which imparts substantial seasonality to the market in Coachella Valley. Seasonality appears to be diminishing as a result of technological adaption to hot summers. Growth Dvnamics Coachella Valley's housing market has historically been volatile. This volatility is traceable in large measure to the supply side - episodes of extensive development at a pace faster than growth in demand followed by periods of correction while excess housing is assimilated. Actually, the demand side of the housing market equation in _ Coachella Valley has historically been more stable than housing demand in other areas, primarily because of the relative stability of two of the key sources of housing demand in Coachella Valley - retirees and second home buyers. In addition, the second home 5 000473 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES segment of Coachella Valley's housing market is supported to some degree by a nationwide market which reduces volatility simply by the law of large numbers. Data in Exhibit III-1 illustrate wide year-to-year variations in the level of new housing development in Coachella Valley. In 1975 only 1,050 new units were authorized by permit in all of Coachella Valley; while in 1978, over 8,000 new units were authorized. Development levels have declined since 1988. In 1991, 2,196 new units were authorized by permit. In 1992, new development authorized by permit was 2,535 units, or about half the average level of development in the Valley since 1980. Alfred Gobar Associates has maintained a specialized mathematics -based housing model for Coachella Valley for approximately 20 years. Data from the 1990 Census for Coachella Valley provided in Exhibit III-2 is a benchmark against which to critique the effectiveness of the housing market simulation system over the decade of the 1980s. Output of the Consultant's simulation system as of April 1, 1990 compares with Census data from Exhibit III-2 as follows: Difference AGA Census April 1990 April 1990 Less AGA Estimate Census Estimate Housing Stock 128,350 129,991 1,641 Occupied Units 78,600 84,838 6,238 Mobile Homes 19,800 20,631 831 Second Homes & Vacant 49,750 45,153 -4,597 Vacant Including Not Yet Occupied 8,825 10,084 1,259 Seasonally Vacant Homes 40,925 35,069 -5,906 Primary & Second Homes Combined 119,525 119,907 382 . The simulation system estimated that combined primary occupied housing and second homes amounted to a total of 119,525 units on April 1, 1990. The Census data's total as of the same date, as shown above, was 119,907 units - a different of 382 units, or 0.32 percent. The simulation system, however, underestimated the primary 0 4 74 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES housing sector by 7.4 percent and overestimated the second home component of housing in Coachella Valley by 16.7 percent. Over the ten-year interval of the 1980's" ' decade, growth in the housing stock exceeded the statistical simulation slightly. Absorption of housing by primary residents (mainstream households and retirees) exceeded the simulations. Mobile homes represented a larger proportion of the increase in Coachella Valley's housing stock than was estimated by an average of 83 units per year. The second home market was not as large as expected for several reasons. Relatively few residents of the U.S. reached the age of second home buyers (50 and over) during the 1980s because of the low birth rate in the U.S. during the 1930s. _ Second homes are often pre -retirement homes, and during the 1980s the status of some second homes converted to "retirement occupied." Part of the overestimate may be traceable to slight differences in the definition of the geographic extent of Coachella Valley. The map in Exhibit III-3 defines the boundaries of the area for which Census data is included in Exhibit III-2, while the statistical simulation is based on the entire Valley including the southern communities of Mecca, Thermal, etc. This geographic factor had minimal effect on the differences. The Consultant's system estimates that almost 41.0 percent of support for the primary housing element is retirees. As shown in Exhibit II1-2, 23.7 percent of Coachella Valley's population in April 1990 was age 60 or over. Typically, these age groups represent a larger share of an area's households than their proportionate share of the population because retirees constitute smaller -than -average size households. In rcent of permanent households in Coachella Valley were 1990, an estimated 41.5 pe retired. The Consultant's allocation of permanent population between mainstream households and retirees, therefore, appears to have been reasonably valid in terms of defining market potential. The statistical simulation system for Coachella Valley estimates that about 35.0 percent of year-round occupied units in Coachella Valley is 7 000475 ALFREO GOSAR ASSOCIATES rental units. Census data indicate 36.9 percent of occupied units in April 1990 were rentals. The simulation system overestimated the proportion of market support represented by second homes. The comparative estimates of the percentage composition of the market on April 1, 1990 is shown below: AGA Census Housing Use Mainstream 38.8% 41.4% Retirees 27.0 29.4* Permanent 65.8 70.8 Second Homes 34.2 29.2 Total 100.0 100.0% Primary Housing Tenure Owners 65.0% 63.1 % Renters 35.0 36.9 Total 100.0% 100.0% *Estimated from 1990 population ape profile. Second Home Market The origin of buyers of more expensive detached housing (over $300,000 a unit) in Coachella Valley for the period from January 1988 to January 1990 (before the recession) was determined on the basis of County Assessor's records for newly purchased housing in higher price ranges. These data are summarized below: 8 000476 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES Residence Address (Tax Bills) of Purchasers of More Expensive Detached Housine Percent of Percent of Total Nonresident Coachella Valley 60.3 % Los Angeles County 18.6 46.8 % Orange,County 1.. Elsewhere in Southern California .3 3.3 Northern California 4.5 11.3 11.5 29.0 Out of State Total Nonresident 39.7% 100.0% Origin of Nonresident Purchasers Southern California 11. Northern California .3 Total California 71.0 Out of State ?9.0 Total 100.0 % Nonresidents accounted for 39.7 percent of sales of higher -priced housing over this two-year interval. Primary residents (as distinct from second home buyers) are a disproportionate component of demand for low-priced housing. Los Angeles and Orange Counties generated 56.4 percent of the nonresident buyers of more expensive housing in Coachella Valley in this sample. Overall, 71.0 percent of nonresident buyers of higher -priced units in the Valley between 1988 and 1990 were from California and 29.0 percent from out of state. One ambiguity about Coachella Valley's housing market relates to sale of custom lots. Homes to be developed on custom lots are generally not tabulated in the periodic surveys of housing sales in Coachella Valley conducted by Market Profiles and the Meyers Group. From 1988 to 1990, the origin of buyers of custom lots in 0 000477 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES Coachella Valley (based on an evaluation of Riverside County's Assessor's data) was as - follows: Residence Address (Tax Bills) of Purchasers of Custom Lots Percent of Percent of Total Nonresident Coachella Valley 64.6% Los Angeles County 10.8 35.6% Orange County 13.8 45.6 Elsewhere in Southern California 4.2* 13.9 Northern California 0.0 0.0 Out of State 1_5 4.9 Total Nonresident 30.3%, 100.0% *Multiple lots purchased by single buyer - probably a speculative builder. Origin of Nonresident Purchasers Buyers of Custom Lots Southern California 95.1 % Northern California 0_0 Total California 91 4. Out of State .9 Total 100.0 % Los Angeles and Orange Counties accounted for about 81.2 percent of sales of custom lots to nonresident buyers over this interval. Less than 5.0 percent of the nonresident buyers of custom lots in Coachella Valley in this sample were from out of California. A similar analysis of the permanent address of a sample of purchasers of second home condominiums in moderate price ranges (less than $300,000 a unit) in Coachella Valley in 1992 shows the following distribution: 10 000478 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES Los Angeles County, California Orange County, California Inland Empire, California San Diego County, California Southern California Northern California. Oregon Arizona/Nevada Western U.S. Percent From Area 50.8% 12.3 4.6 4.6 72.3 3.1 1.5 3.1 80.0 Eastern U.S. 3. Canada 3.11 Europe 1.5 Hawaii 1. Unspecified b.2 Total 100.0 Northern Coachella Valley's share of new housing development activity diminished significantly during the 1980s. Exhibits III-4 and III-5 summarize building permit activity by area in terms of units (Exhibit III-4) and permit value (Exhibit III-5). As shown in Exhibit III-6, unincorporated areas in the Valley represent a large share of the number of new units authorized for construction in Coachella Valley in some years. The shares of building permit activity in each area have been as follows: 11 00rAT1 ALFREO GOBAR ASSOCIATES New Units Authorized 1980-1992 Average 1992 Percent Share of Housing Percent of Units of Units Stock 1990 Palm Springs 14.3 0.8 23.5 Palm Desert 15.3 23.4 14.0 Indian Wells 2.7 3.1 2.3 Rancho Mirage 5.0 1.2 7.2 Cathedral City 13.3 9.7 11.7 Desert Hot Springs. 5.4 8.6 4.2 Subtotal 56.0 46.8 62.9 Indio 9.8 9.8 10.0 Coachella 3.0 3.6 2.9 La Quinta 9.4 12.6 4.9 Unincorporated 22.9 27.3 29.3 Subtotal 45.0 53.2 37.1 Palm Springs and Rancho Mirage are becoming a decreasing share of the Valley's housing market as development activity has shifted to the southern part of the Valley - especially La Quinta. Demand Structure Housing Market Elements Exhibit III-7 is a summary of the pattern of demand for housing in Coachella Valley based on an assumed absorption level of about 4,815 primary housing units a year and 1,300 second homes per year. As indicated, increase in rental occupancy is expected to average 1,685 units per year at this level of growth in demand. Increased occupancy of mobile home units is projected to average 860 to 885 units per year on a more or less constant basis, creating a leveraged effect of level year-to-year changes in the demand on the market potential for stick -built homes. The profile of housing demand by type of unit at this assumed average annual level is expressed in another format in Exhibit III-8. These disaggregations are useful for interpreting the specific projections provided in a subsequent section of the report. - Retirees, drawn in large measure from Southern California, have had the capacity to 12 000480 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES purchase fairly expensive homes because of appreciation in their primary homes coincident with rapidly increasing home values throughout Southern California. Subject to the exclusion of part of the gain on the sale of a primary residence from taxation, older buyers of more expensive housing in Coachella Valley are to some degree indifferent to price as long as the price does not exceed the price of their previous residence less $125,000. Retirees to Coachella Valley have probably owned their primary home for about 20 years, implying that retirees purchased a primary residence in about 1970. Since 1970, home prices in Los Angeles and Orange County have appreciated dramatically. The estimated average value of primary housing owned by retirees entering the market in Coachella Valley recently is on the order of $330,000 to $370,000 a unit, accounting for a relative bulge in potential home sales in the $220,000 to $300,000 price range in California Desert retirement communities. Current Market Conditions The computer simulations of primary sector housing supply and demand patterns in Coachella Valley, illustrated in Exhibit II1-9, show a decline in demand concurrent with continued new development (at a slower pace) after 1990. The gap between housing inventory and the demand simulations represents (in part) the second home component of the market. Specific simulations for the single family sector are included in Exhibit III-10. Comparable simulations for the multi -family sector are included in Exhibit III- 11. A more direct illustration of the degradation in market circumstances in Coachella Valley since 1990 is an index of housing market conditions calculated by dividing the theoretical estimate of demand by the theoretical estimate of supply. When demand is growing faster than supply, the index curve rises to the right. When demand is growing more slowly than increase in supply or is declining, the index curve slopes downwards to the right, as illustrated in Exhibit III-12. Similar indices for the single family and multi -family sectors are included in Exhibits III-13 and 1I1-14. 13 000481 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES The decline in the multi -family index has been relatively more modest than the — decline in the single family index because (as illustrated in Exhibit III-1) development of multi. -family housing receded after 1988. Nonetheless, the market currently should be competitive and sales slow - supported by inertia which damps the real world manifestations of the theoretical relationships inherent in the graphic simulations. Part of the ongoing simulations of Coachella Valley's housing market includes estimates of local employment. These estimates are based in part on building permit activity for construction of nonresidential facilities (Exhibit III-15), hotel room counts, etc. Despite the recession, development of retail and office facilities in 1992 exceeded the comparable figures for previous years. As shown in Exhibit III-16, these simulations indicate a decline in local employment opportunities after 1990 which has contributed to a weaker market for primary mainstream housing. As illustrated in Exhibit III-17, employment in Coachella Valley and the Inland Empire overall decreased between 1990 and 1992. Estimates of the employment structure in Coachella Valley are shown in Exhibit I1I-18. Trade and services accounted for over 60.0 percent of the nonagricultural jobs in Coachella Valley in 1992. Average annual employment growth from 1980 to 1993 was 2,471 jobs a year, as shown in Exhibit III-19. Over the long term, construction activity usually represents an above -average proportion of jobs in Coachella Valley because the local economy grows at a faster rate in percentage terms than California as a whole or the U.S. overall and also because total employment is low relative to population reflecting the large retirement component in Coachella Valley's population. Recent employment estimates in Exhibit III-20 show that job loss has been decreasing over successive twelve-month periods, suggesting that the recession's effect on Coachella Valley's economy is bottoming out. 14 000482 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES Exhibit III-21 is a comparison of the computer simulations of housing market conditions -the index of housing market conditions - and an index of median housing value in Coachella Valley reflected in recent resale activity. The demand index peaked in 1989 and has subsequently declined. It took until 1992 for resale values to peak. They have subsequently declined dramatically which is typical of the interrelated behavior of these two indices in the 144 U.S. housing markets for which comparable data of this type is maintained. Usually, local resale prices do not begin to increase relative to resale prices throughout the U.S. until the index for the specific market has turned positive for at least Six months or more typically a year. If this relationship prevails in Coachella Valley with economic recovery and recovery of the housing market index, the trend of median resale value is likely to lag the recovery, stlogestlRg that recent values are a reasonable basis for projecting future values for at least a year to two years. 15 009483 ALFRED GOSAR ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT III-1 RESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT TRENDS* COACHELLA VALLEY, CA AREA Value ($000) Value Per Unit - Single Units Multi- Single Multi- Total Single Family Multi- Famil Total Year FamilyFamit , Total Family Family 554 1,496 $19,092 $7,592 $26,684 $20,268 $13,704 $17,837 1970 942 1,699 2,651 24,070 28,764 52,834 25,284 16,930 19,930 1971 952 2,697 4,263 40,594 43,871 84,465 25,922 16,267 19,814 1972 1, 566 45,478 26,861 72,339 26,182 15,006 20,510 1973 1,566 1,9 3,263 42,002 5,202 47,204 40,309 19,705 36,144 1974 1,042 264 1,306 34,105 4,836 38,941 39,749 7087 1975 858 192 1,050 ,567 25,188 36,939 197 1,345 881 , 156,334 2821 9,472 185,806 44,859 30,415 41,717 1977 3,485 969 4,454 454 282,125 82,654 364,779 49,357 33,833 44,709 1978 5,716 2,443 8,159 205,637 79,836 285,473 53,945 35,047 46,876 1979 3,812 2,278 6,090 75,766 41,658 117,424 48,105 27,902 38,274 1980 1,575 1,493 3,068 95,790 31,201 126,991 71,379 34,861 56,768 1981 1,342 895 2,237 86,710 17,916 104,626 79,843 54 ,957 74,098 1982 1,086 326 1,412 224,288 49,379 273,667 89,643 41,287 74,004 1983 2,502 1,196 3,698 272,389 179,115 451,504 80,303 50,755 65,237 1984 3,392 3,529 6,921 170,802 112,698 283,500 100,887 1985 1,693 2,720 4,413 260,111 123,939 384,050 92,042 43,245 67,472 1986 2,826 2,866 5,692 250,329 64,157 314,486 113,476 48,420 89,064 1987 2,206 1,325 3,531 512,856 88,805 601,661 113,741 59,401 100,210 1988 4,509 1,495 6,004 491,126 53,150 544,276 127,334 64,581 116,298 1989 3,857 823 4,680 399,908 61,533 461,441 28 81285 1990 3,013 757 3,770 216,672 36,227 252,899 132, , 115,1632298 1991 1,633 563 2,196 294,737 20,097 314,834 130,012 74,990 124,195 1992 2,267 268 2,535 • Excludes Mobile Homes. Pacific tional a l Source: Security and Safety;nAnalysis Riverside County, , Department of Building of - Building Permits." U.S. Bureau of the Census; "Construction Statistics Division." rescoach.xls 16 w4a4 HOUSING PROFILE: 1990 COACHELLA VALLEY,CA POPULATION 221230 GRP. QTRS/INST 2444 HOUSING UNITS TENURE Occupied Owner -occupied Renter -occupied Vacant For sale For rent Not yet occupied For occasional use For migrant workers Other vacant Boarded -up HOUSING VALUE $ 0-$ 19,999 $ 20,000-$ 39,999 $ 40,000-$ 59,999 $ 60,000-$ 74,999 $ 75,000-$ 99,999 $100,000-$124,999 $125,000-$149,999 $150,000-$174,999 $175,000-$199,999 $200,000-$249,999 $250,000-$299,999 $300,000-$399,999 $400,000-$499,999 $500,000 or more Total Average value S Median value $ UNITS IN STRUCTURE 1, detached 1, attached 2 3 or more 3-4 5-9 10-19 20-49 50 or more Mobile home/trailer Other EXHIBIT III-2 HOUSEHOLDS FAMILIES 129991 UNITS 84838 53544 31294 45153 3431 4478 2175 29460 35 5574 484 UNITS 155 396 1900 3809 7133 5306 4113 2891 2065 2755 1761 1940 918 1583 36725 167781 123415 UNITS 49603 25485 2902 29111 7097 6652 6371 4999 3992 20631 2259 % 65.3 41.2 24.1 34.7 2.6 3.4 1.7 22.7 0.0 4.3 0.4 % 0.4 1.1 5.2 10.4 19.4 14.4 11.2 7.9 5.6 7.5 4.8 5.3 2.5 4.3 38.2 19.6 2.2 22.4 5.5 5.1 4.9 3.8 3.1 15.9 1.7 URBAN DECISION SYSTEMSf 01/17N92 84838 AVG HH SIZE 2.58 55656 AVG FAMILY SIZE 3.26 e % TENURE BY RACE OWNER RENTER White 70532 66.7 33.3 Black 1816 37.4 62.6 Other 12490 46.7 53.3 Spanish 19191 44.6 55.4 PERSONS PER UNIT OWNER RENTER 1 23021 58.5 41.5 2 31588 74.3 25.7 3 10637 56.2 43.8 4 8828 56.5 43.5 5 5135 54.1 45.9 6 2743 51.6 48.4 7 or more 2886 50.0 50.0 MONTHLY RENT UNITS % No cash rent 1040 3.4 $ 1-$ 199 2143 7.0 $ 200-$ 299 2282 7.4 $ 300--$ 349 2007 6.5 $ 350-$ 399 2370 7.7 $ 400-$ 449 2945 9.6 $ 450-$ 499 3324 10.8 $ 500-$ 549 3173 10.3 $ 550-$ 599 2895 9.4 $ 600-$ 649 2510 8.2 $ 650-$ 699 1790 5.8 $ 700-$ 749 1353 4.4 $ 750-$ 999 1974 6.4 $1000 or more 935 3.0 Total 30741 Average rent $ 512 Median rent $ 497 AVG VALUE 161913 201462 148868 142346 52987 147396 VALUE/RENT BY RACE White Black Other Race Spanish VACANT For sale For rent ROOMS/UNIT 4.72 AVG VALUE 179857 95101 94001 93734 AVG RENT 543 452 414 416 COUNT AVG $ 3431 202118 4478 636 OWN RENT 5.30 3.69 (CH) Source: 1990 Census STF1 - -- ------------------------------ n Systems/PO Box 25953/LosAngeles, CA 90025/(800) 633-9568 Urban Decisio 17 w48 a Exhibit III-2 (Cont'd) URBAN DECISION SYSTEMS, INC. POPULATION PROFILE: 1990 01/17/92 COACHELLA VALLEY,CA POPULATION 221230 HOUSEHOLDS 84838 AVG HH SIZE 55656 AVG FAMILY SIZE 2.58 3.26 GRP QTRS/ZNST 2444 FAMILIES � MALE FEMALE HOUSEHOLD TYPE 55656 %<18 45.8 %65+ 30.3 AGE <1 2387 1.1 1205 1182 Families Married-cpl 44260 41. 1- 2 8047 3.6 4133 4133 3914 3366 Male/no wife 3646 55.9 3-2 6870 3. 3504 1719 1674 Fem/no husbd 7750 67.5 5 3393 1.5 1605 1527 Non -family 23021 1.3 39.1 44.9 6 3132 9434 1.4 4.3 4726 4708 1-person 7-4 10-11 5865 2.7 2973 2892 2511 MARITAL STATUS 15+ % M o ' F 12-13 5099 2.3 2588 1283 1218 Never married 96823 14 2501 2535 1.1 1. 1307 1228 Married 4444 50.9 40.3 49.1 59.71 15 16 2576 1.2 1320 1256 Separated 18518 Divorced 41.8 58.2 17 2558 1.2 1271 1287 1293 Widowed 13643 18.0 82.0 18 2609 1.2 1316 19 2783 2969 1.3 1.3 1510 1596 1273 1373 RACE 162678 % 73.5 20 21 2901 1.3 1554 1347 White Black 5582 2.5 22-24 9612 4.3 5224 4388 8707 Am Ind 1660 0.8 25-29 18425 8.3 9718 9485 8407 Asian/PI 4552 2.1 30-34 17892 8.1 7807 7244 e Chin 492 0.2 35-39 15051 6.8 5.7 6400 6140 Filipino Fi 213 2213 1.0 0.3 40-44 45-49 12540 10355 4.7 4468 5088 anise Asian Indian. 368 0.2 50-54 9556 4.3 4468 4527 5236 Korean 243 0.1 55-59 9763 4520 4.4 2.0 2056 2464 2464 Vietnamese 76 62 0.0 0.0 60-61 62-64 7636 3.5 3453 4183 Cambodian 9 0.0 " 65+ 40221 18.2 18092 22129 HmonLaotgan 14 0.0 65-69 13505 6.1 6238 7267 Thai 36 0.0 70-74 18207 37611 4446 Other Asian 216 0.1 75-79 8207 3.7 3.7 1876 2573 Pacific Islanders 216 0.1 80-84 4449 2915 2.0 1.3 1037 1878 Hawaiian 106 19 0.0 0.0 85+ Median 34.7 33.4 36.5 Samoan Guamanian 72 0.0 SEX MALE % FEMALE % 50.4 Other PI Other Race 19 46758 0.0 21.1 109832 49.6 111398 % SPANISH ORIGIN BY NATIONALITY % 5PANISH ORIGIN BY RACE 32347 14.6 Not Hispanic 140564 63.5 White 683 0.3 Hispanic origin 80666 73506 36.5 33.2 _ Black Am Indian 586 0.3 0.3 Mexican Puerto Rican 474 0.2 - Asian/PI 638 46412 46412 21.0 21.5 Cuban 228 6458 0.1 2.9 _ Other Total race Spanish origin Other (CP) Source: 1990 Census STF1 - ------------------------------- Urban Decision Systems/PO Box 25953fos Angeles, CA 90025/(800) 633-9568 000486 EXHIBIT 11I-3 COACHELLA VALLEY AREA BOUNDARIES WERT H( SPRINGS i Desert Hot S21,01s ' - 445.01 I,, 449.Q1 446 i 1 I IL —a. SPRINGS I I , 1 Pa:R Sos -t'-7•--i... ........... 448.03 i' 451.D3 "' P;IV �� :sSEpi an. 3 A CalneC'al C611-Palm Desi 451.04 444 ``tom I-------; I i 1 I i I � I 1 1 1 Tynu Rosa .Pru.»ta _ 1 452.01 I; r , I � � •VtM � M , _ Ceunena valley 3 , 3 I = 4 1 3 r�f' '3 1, 3 ; t.J __lr 19 000487 OI N � X n O U a . N O-D OCR-Ot'f o n Q 0 -n COtn D-QnQm0-vN000 r<^ v r- m nC n In n nfOV mHlnotnr 0 a 000000000 AO m-O ^ mOry N O C v m -^No - H n -nLnnC o ^ Q h v ` NQmm ^1°0 n-nLn Ln mLn �m n a N _ • 0 L e N r m O D 4 _ C o000001 O1 l�1 u1 AmmACN-mta^ Q r A o N U o} O O O O O O O O O q ^n <__ mom N a LL O O O O O O r N N n e 1VF r rr O n m O n C N n N- v r m OOF- n OOQOn O O O o C Oo.tl n N O ONo Oh O N ry n r O n n N N N n O QNQ01 Of N O r n - 0 • O O OO O O tl n O n O o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 a ` O O O O O O N_= o n � u G ^ N o N-- Q Q O m n m O O O O OO r h a m O lA r m O v O n n m O O O v 9 n .V ov O ry O N N n A n r n n n n NNn u F Q ^. m e n a r O o Na LL Z C a n r OI �• O cn O m m A tl n O m 1O N m m' n o n O C O r Q n °+ C Imo• C - N- 61 n Ill OI A n v NNtlnmo-OQ tlGo:N^I^Lno m a -mom _ ° f' a - h 0 0 0 O N ONO 0 0 n 0 Q O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u ry 0 v n N - O i T 3 ;'E O O O O O O N E B 9 - n r N •• O °� O m 0 n tl n O N m n A n N v M1- A r Q Q A F m h O • O} - N� 4f n I/f n A n Q - Ill h - • d c.E NN�on�oomoQmoo^=- -`°'°r 4 O_ N LL 3 O _ m n e N r m o v 0 0 0 a m< In N Q m O n n N N n n Of n h tl n 7 m e r p Q n_ m m m V F n n ID O n YI ^ n- O - m 9 A n tO•f - 'a � r• - � C e C n^ocomin OG 0 0 n n _ • Qu'ImO n rAm C5 tl rl0 nm N m m � OOOO nntl O O N tl tl-m tl H N N O �-h n u p,jO y} p &.E r I[1 -hmmv Von C U a-nvltltl�rr'd0oh mN ov nr0 _e T nQ I1nff rv^ -n m0V- OO- m m � Q N GY � n C _ N ll C q O ' � C °I Q In r •• n G _ n� N^vu+CQ nn OCCNp•p-tlBlOn r^ n N f'i h O n tl� tl¢ F- N N m m^ m O "• N r V 4° U E� O O= N LnNm Q Q Q On-- ^ liM1 O m N N N r m N h m O � • E m • O • n a tll Q Q Nr0 N m O N ,_ cl m m � m O m n n m O v h m N v 0 N N n E Q Or rn DO-N Q mm�-FnN a n a 0 0 U •, - ,� T NAmn man oINnOO = VI j.E -mrmOtmm o�QN-� - N 7 j ° d OO Lnrn m N m¢ N m O IO v r N N tl m 0 m O F o n Ill tl r Ol a e U a a e E O T OIm-r Cr NlitN--- m O Ill o P r Ln OL1-ONnnnnno_o_ C E - N lit m N � N mLL G G i 01O ^h nQomn 0OI O -n Cf A A rv- Cl A 01 QLmm� m NO Nn QOOr mm0 -N n n -- r Fn rr n D DOO DOGO mm O] Oln n D O OI m m 0 01 m n m 0 - O N • Q�jlmrm F n r r r r �' C O O m m O O C C n QI m 01 n 01 OI 01 01 C5 CY C1 0 CY m m a C Ol G'I r - - - ^ - - ^ - - - - - n eV - O Y OI m 01 n °f m °f - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - n n - n m c`I C e alma 7-.- 20 000488 W r d � N J • O X n ' G U 1 Nnn 0 ^Ll <m n nL'1 m r tl O m Pm <Ill ^m< 0 n y en o o 0 N o P^ n tl m n m O m N O 0 0 n m N^ m O N OI r m O N nla n F" NNO<OnrnNO tlP NN PNf7^ 1'f O nK1Om mmntl m O l a A n Ue O v mP O OO 0 Q^oto nnn mtl Oaeln^<Ntl tlrrnNL�Noc?Onci 0nar nm -m r0 mr NN O<OmO^ TO O O O O C O O O O nm POLl tlnnu m 0 NN ,r� NNmoommL�Lln C m Nm n my non m m N N N ma LL n Q n^ N O a U n0d 0400 ONv mro 0=0=0" nm0 N<r N m m O P m 0 n 0 0 0 o N N m O d 0 C^ tl 0 ^ r N kD m o n c r P O m m 0 O O n m r O1 ^ N m- m n N r r' N d r 0 0 0 O v m m � 0^ On a 1n<nial^O<Il1mr g N L'10rnOnntlm^Otlmmn Nlll nNn^m m nememrntl nm N N0N ^0 Ham^ GAm O O O O O O O O O n N n< P O O 0 H m r 0 N 00 npl e O m mn0 <^ N n m e 0Q n4Ll Oi� ftlV tNV INDOO mtl0 mmrPr� e r Olnm 0 I P�,il:md s CiC N Pi O _ o Nn00^dr^mm�mimm�m^mr ~ N N f7 n lfl r N 1p {il 01 n m N N N CI Q Pi N OI CI fl t7 N ^ ^ n W W f'i w O C7 r O d 01 O N^ N 1(1 O N ^ l(1 e N^ d A O A N ^ J = o 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 m O� O Q^ MO 0 0 O O Q Q ` ^ m 0 0 0 0 0 O n NM000 m r O m N _ �'� Or000 _ p •e m 00 tl0 w • J N _ _ W J �i IG ON U LL N n w e n i • J CL W O e S al N 0 L�1 m r CO N P m m N m O^ Nwm ^wr O O O O O O O O O N n O C m 0 n n N m O N m m 9 Q m m^ n O a^ N u a S C O T N n e P^ r r N m m N C N^ n OIlfO^ < Op mmr mtl0 m riN tltl^tl Nm< OmO Q �nn NQmO mr ^rOO n0to^r nmry Q m0 rvNt'f<Amm Nt'1A NNn w ^ C V O Z yly nOmOn yNwnNm N ^ [ f m rm mm^ cm mammNnr� OnQN v^^wv9 W Ab<^ rlCnN'1i mmI0O Q0r0 m0e0 rorno ^mN N mNm^ 0e ^m ,ntl C mN ' N^N Nn =�,,. JU O ON000 PMOcO0O0In m0r0N0 m N O v r nnmNv nO eN^ FOT :NmO�nO�OnmN 0 � 04V woN x W o 0. =O 00o 000 nn000ronmvomo000o m n U_ C/ ._ t N m cn w t ri N • LL a L iy r^ N^ma mn P wrQm� Ov mV,Nd Orn, mmepm m nN nr nv7 nAm^N^La +mOnN O . O en 0000 O�TE Qmrmmm Nn0ln<oONtl^ tlarrN�lmr Q d O el N00 O V Y ra 080m! an m j riO e }.•• ^ Q Onm n0 N^ Orut d Ne'1 N^ N ^ G rCw O mOOm n n^^^ w w N N N n e O C G r m^ m A O r Ill N r � = cr - wmOulmO nm0 LA^^m0 00o0 01n ON m-m0 0'= N O a N Q �c.hoommin olOn u a tllllnm Pmr tlOr m W Z d e do -NNn m mOOn o nr o avl ^<'1^d P r�Nr unman IG eim NN y i •vNr m e ala- N n�ryN cl^ nN .- : p C; ~ me:mvCd Oi mmOm Oi Pi C="pOe- t m r ^ N N n O n L7 a^ m 0 n 0 n m w ; V . [� O Z O C mor n m m^ m^ Q m m 0 0 0 0 0 m <OO v Odlll N ^Z a = r ~ c Q= OI'1mmN mOnw<mrvtlmmNrOaNnmONeNrrmOtl rNNOav Ou)rNN O O V?nN^ i nC` �� OmnLLlrvmnm OO 'y .r jC LO d N � V 0_ • Em ^e ^ CO Z S LL N • W m e 0 O m I!1 N n O r N N elf O ain N a O O n v tl O m L'1 m ry N � O N_ n Pe�mm-Nwrm-.nnOonnm h p N N^ ^ ^ ^ nN O O O a t W Q C NLL m n n N e n m 0 m O N m 0 m 0 nm� 0 C O = Q m o n oo0W ON m dr3 O (r O m m n m m ul n 7O m N ^ . E m O NNNN • n a m w to 0"N N'''= O mmmtl ntlm e c . O�ll^m N mClll t'1 mOnPON<^ <Om T� 5 NmNmO '� OrC Nmmm�r<NNO ntl00 mm mmm d ern w nOe N m Clt . mm� mnm O _ C G O e O V 2 N '•• Ine NOL'1 HN ONA m m Onm m O r 7 E ANNIl1O0 ry N NCl ^ r nn NIO m �• tl H � p V E �4 nnmNlpOmh^'N1pNmdeO O o • � >� O L+ m m e N NNu Nta Ne^N OViI OYI 0- Oio= nn—mO r NOrry ^almO ad wdn O uN wm tlm^ na+ moo .!OeH o N N_m ne10 N Vf m mriG^ICn nm00el m^ ^--� e L _• 'a •` yec {7P n m N V7 0N0 Ifl ^ G 1>EL N^< A N^ v N C r m m O^ C OOO O mmm mL_1 m u e 111 mn Om 0 Nn vOtl nm m 0 ^N `l0 r.r rnrrm mmOO mmmmmmmmmmmmmalmmmmm Amal j O CO O rr nnn rtlmmPmPOPPtlnmm e m m m m m m n m m m m m m ^l mom m^ m m m w-^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ A aw p > ^ --------- Moto 7 N 21 (),1r,4SJ LU N EE O _ 2 J Q N Z J J a .. ti _ O W U Q y _z Z Lij J lil J U a LLI -� a g U u a a F-' O U W a m W N_ O 1 D a to F- ' Z �a J r< O O m tO Lq T N N C O N O m (0 m V r^ m r N n N r N r N O C O U tf7 N tU U) t- QI r h O N r 10 O m CO 'o p m 0 ^ J o . • m V m n n m N m t0 N m N Cf C .j r r N r^ O C o o cl n 7 N tfI r 01 0 Q1 O m M r r N O N N r O r r e ry O m V) O N 1'7 r r r r N PI L r U 0 O U m cn m m �O O r m In 10 N N t7 r tO N m O ? n r t0 m l'f t•f O N N 1[f �O �O Q1 r l(1 m L6 Pl N m C l ^ n 46 O) m C r r N h n O m Pl h m r t7 b N O V i If1 m m ri ^ of m m w = C O C O N t nmhu0 m roi1010w��m 9 U •^ N N N L m U r Iff O m N O 7 Q1 N N P1 6 p O 1f1 V < m O ? t0 h 1!] m m {[1 N Pl n to �O t•f c 2 n C w m (o O n u7 v C C O O N Cr 0 O r) 7 t7 r r N N Pf N P1 �3 iy p O r Cf « m �o 10 �n o) h N m 7 e0 1.1 N "IO �`! ? r Lo O m ^ m r Q1 If1 P� r �O o w mN r m^ O N ^ m N ^ ^ O_ o N N r ^ O) t7 �rmr�onoo�?v?r E w po<o�!^o < N h m mui6inuir-mno)m c c �vrnm��n vtlf Ufv O a a m m O r N e'f 7 N m n m T r N t7 <' In �O n m m O" N o n m m m m m m m m m m p O m m m m m m m N m m m m O) QI Q) O^ r c m m m m m m m m m m m r ^ r o m 0 O r C O O O m U 22 000490 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT III-7 OVERALL HOUSING DEMAND ELEMENTS AT AVERAGE GROWTH IN DEMAND OF 6,115 UNITS A YEAR Assumed Average Annual Absorption 6,115 Mobile Homes -885 Stick Built 5,230 Apartments -1.685 For -Sale Stick Built 3,545 Mobile Homes + 885 Total For Sale 4,430 Primary Buyers 3,130 Source: Alfred Gobar Associates. F:WPPS%TMLES%TMGOLDMN%JWy 7. 19939 23 0 0 ILI 4 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT 111-8 COMPOSITION OF MARKET AT AVERAGE ANNUAL DEMAND OF 6,115 UNITS A YEAR Mainstream Second Homes Total Total By Tenure: Rentals 1,685 - 1,685 For Sale 3,130 •1,,300 4,430 Total 4,815 11300 6,115 Less Mobile Homes 885 885 Stick Built 3,930 1,300 5,230 Stick Built For Sale 3,545 Rentals 1,685 Total 5,230 Source: Alfred Gobar Associates. F.WPSITABLES%TMGOLDMNVWy 7. 19938 24 0 f, C) EXHIBIT III-9 COACHELLA VALLEY, CA (000s) TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS 140 130 120110 _s .1- U N 100 ref T 90 S so 70 60 so V Y Y Y QUARTERS =r svpply Demand ($000,0003) 14600 12600 10600 V A L 8600 U E 6600 4600 TOTAL RESIDENTIAL VALUE 2600 . . . . . . i >: 7 E Z a ; E o S `s E < o S y r i r � QUARTERS 25 000493 (00o5) so T so Ir U N 1 60 T S so 40 EXHIBIT III-10 COACHELLA VALLEY, CA SINGLE FAMILY UNITS 30 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 t 3: `s 3 L $ 3 L 9• S 6 3 QUARTERS -- - Supply Demand ($000,0005) SINGLE FAMILY VALUE 12100 11100 10100 ' _ Y.J 9100 v aloo —s A L 7100 s� U 6100 E sloo 4100 3100 2100 . . . . . s 'J 3 3 3 L 2 ° u 3 S i<. T Z 3•= 3 i= i '3 — u 2 2 Y Y � $ � i QUARTERS 26 o00494 1000s) 54 49 as U N 39 1 T 34 S 29 24 EXHIBIT III-11 COACHELLA VALLEY, CA MULTI FAMILY UNITS 19 yy. pp. pp. i . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 07 ul u7 a 3 L S 2 3 L S E 3 L$$ 3 $ o L$ 0 9 L$� 3 L$ v 3 • 9 t 3 L 5 g 2 L S 6 3 L 9 t . < c o < c < o < o < QUARTERS —� Supply Demand 1s000.000si MULTI FAMILY VALUE 2580 2380 2180 1980 A 1780 L 1580 E 1380 118o 980 780 580 a; L S 9 3 = a QUARTERS __ 27 EXHIBIT III-12 COACHELLA VALLEY, CA TOTAL RESIDENTIAL UNITS INDEX 0.72 s 0.70 0.68 0.66 0.64 0.62 0.60 0.58 0.56 i . . . . . . . . . . . 47 y3f L 3 r a 3 r i " 5 • •i i_ L a e 3 $ c i 3 L 5> 9 • % 3 7 • $ 9 < 5 i O i a g V>! r r s r r e > > g $ r r QUARTERS TOTAL RESIDENTIAL VALUE INDEX 0.43 0.42 0.41 0.40 0.39 0.38 0.37 0.36 77. 3 e7 i_ 9 °% 3 y L I i L a r e t 3 : 1L _ c i c c L c i Y Y r $ r s QUARTERS 28 �Q('49u EXHIBIT III-13 COACHELLA VALLEY, CA SINGLE FAMILY UNITS INDEX 0.72 0.70 0.68 0.66 0.64 0.62 0.60 0.58 0.56 p, FF . . . . . . . . 5 ' S 0 5;L 2 z<< c_ or S ? L S 6 3 c 5 t QUARTERS SINGLE FAMILY VALUE INDEX 0.43 0.42 0.41 0.40 0.39 0.38 0.37 0.36 0.35 j 9 7 7 <' '•''' .�.' S i 3 `a 3 L � a 3 ,T., S 3 L� L 3 L 2� � e 3 t 5 L� Z� `s QUARTERS 29 000W EXHIBIT III-14 COACHELLA VALLEY, CA MULTI FAMILY UNITS INDEX 0.72 0.70 0.68 0.66 0.64 0.62 0.60 0.58 0.56 'a 5 s > QUARTERS MULTI FAMILY VALUE INDEX 0.62 0.57 0.52 0.47 0.42 0.37 . . . . . p. 7. < V a QUARTERS 30 �pU493 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT III-15 NONRESIDENTIAL BUILDING PERMIT TRENDS COACHELLA VALLEY, CALIFORNIA New Industrial New Commercial Permit Valuation (000) Permit Year Retail Office Total Valuation (000) 1972 $1,255 $888 $2,143 $3,502 1973 2,714 1,491 4,205 2,413 1974 5,915 1,085 7,000 2,148 1975 2,784 1,307 4,091 2,822 1976 2.879 2,149 5,028 2,250 1977 3,428 6,724 10,152 3,181 1978 5,273 8,048 13,321 5,715 1979 21,849 15,689 37,538 3,864 1980 11,000 20,804 31,804 5,227 1981 40,094 16,858 56,952 6,908 1982 29,832 7,182 37,014 3,951 1983 12,703 8,214 20,917 6,083 1984 20,744 18,594 39,338 17,951 1985 33,505 15,788 49,293 17,325 - 1986 17,512 17,951 35,463 19,598 1987 36,433 15,078 51,511 10,371 1988 28,008 11,040 39,048 9,695 1989 25,305 13,954 39,259 9,154 1990 34,640 10,967 45,607 18,007 1991 31,317 18,378 49,695 6,592 1992 58,654 23,924 82,578 7,144 Source: Construction Reports, U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census. nrscoach. xls 31 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT III-16 NONAGRICULTURAL WAGE AND SALARY EMPLOYMENT TRENDS COACHELLA VALLEY, CA Year Employment Change j 1980 - 51,535 - 708 1981 52,243 -635 1982 51,608 1,883 1983 53,491 4,667 1984 58,158 5,351 1985 63,509 4,629 1986 68,138 5,129 1987 73,268 4,172 t988 77,440 6,438 1989 83,878 5,593 1990 89,471 -587 1991 88,884 -1,569 1992 87,315 Average Annual Change: 1980 - 1985 2,395 1986 - 1992 3,196 Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. innPasPwEVA& PCOACM N V? M N O to .r M m m N to 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N m t0 P7 m N m M m V. m n M N O O OOO NN O m0o0tomn M m W m O O r m Lfj P m r m m P O N N r N r N 1% ^ N to n N N m N m M m^ n Q m m � to m 'C m W � W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O cn mm cn m m N m m W m m O O O O O O Om O o O N M m n n^ W m n a m0v — r to m�-mmof O t"t N^ m 4to m r P P m N N m N P co n W M m .N- n O 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O O M mi M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O am m m n N M Ln m' 40 P m r t0 m W t0 N P ^ W W m^ tO N^ N m L6 l0 ^ P O m N N m N to (a M m M^ r n m O O O O O O O O O O m m m n^ n M W m n m n M W V) m P ti N CZ) 0 0 0 10 0 0 a 0 0 N W N m n m M r 10 to m m P m N to t0 W O m ^ n m^ W N m p N W tl O m N n m N m N t0 co m^ N tD O m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O m tmlf C.) n m 0 0 P m m m O O O O O O O O O O ^ p rt P m O m M m P m t0 P n m Q N M O m a t0 m^ to to O m N r ri ^ L6 v r m n m m m N f V m N N m M N^^ Ln n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O n m m m^ N m m m r W f'1 P N M N N ^ W M m O O O 0 Q 0 n Or m m to m to m t0 M O N 0 N W N N P co m^ N^ N r N 0 N m o. m cn r ¢ r U O m 0 0 0 a 0 0 0 O O O Q O U m to m C9 _ 7 0 m n m to M ycc M W m m O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 r m M tOo o m 2 r to O N O 0 o M m n M^ th a c -' a O m _ P } J m ^ N P m^ N t0 .n- m n Q to N P n M N^ w J W W Q z ¢ rt to 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O a J W 0 m m G M w o r m tm 10 W F m 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 O Ln y t0 N m m m m In W) m m m to M P m< m m 0m W W ^ N P n P t0 n Z W N^ m m m fV ^ m U N a }� N M m N N 0 v N a Z W f0 2 W W O 0 >. O O O O O OO O O O U} O ^ m^Om^ P m MPA It N N m,Q nN H 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 0 m Wnmro m J Cl. m t0rIT to P t0 N Qn O O co m m m n L6 W P0 toi ^ m 1D m >fL N t'V ^ t0 N O O 0 Q W C C M oortc^n- ° W M n c o m E E 0 LO 0m 0000000a0 0 O m OW m W MmomnO rtvcli �: mEEmN NN ^ tN7 tN(] m tt Nm M 0 to W W ^ P 7 7 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O N m LO v 0 m O N^ P O to P m n O O C N m O O O O O O 0 0 0 O w rmj p m ^ ^ U U m W n m P Q< O N m 1O I ? N tp ^ ^ P n � > T O m to m m Id ri o M^ to N O •- m O Lnm m > > W p tO 00 N O m m m to n m W O P n 0 e o M to L o L o m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O m W U1 r M r n 0 m V o V O m^^ M m N N m m m < N n^^ P ^ n W _ ^ o N M P tO m m v N W N O r m 0 m U O U O N c A 0 M 11 O 0000 0 00 00000 O N NOM rn OPm W 40 ON " m OO O O 000 m N0 r M m O" m n M n m m m M - m W M m n m V N n r m Q^ m N tl1 L O A O. m N W M N W m m^ N W r N to N O r m 0 v T 0 c c o 0 a c a O V a o- o—U c a�U�f-3Wm�7 F- ai�ir-3LLH� � — 33 -- ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT III-18 DISTRIBUTION OF NONAGRICULTURAL EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY, 1992p COACHELLA VALLEY, CA Percent Industry Employment Percent United States Mining 34 0.0 0.6 Construction 4,683 5.4 4.2 Manufacturing 9,052 10.4 16.8 - Transportation, Communication, 1,880 2.2 5.3 & Public Utilities Wholesale & Retail Trade 29,333 33.6 23.2 Finance, Insurance, 7.6 6 2 & Real Estate 6,594 Services 24,943 28.6 26.6 Government 10,798 12.4 17.1 Total 87,315 100.0 100.0 Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. _. COACM.VSA 34 7Q1' p�U502 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT III-19 " CHANGE IN NONAGRICULTURAL WAGE AND SALARY EMPLOYMENT AREA: COACHELLA VALLEY, CA - DATE: 11 /30193 J EMPLOYMENT CHATOTALNGE I EMPLOYMENT 4180 7193 ANNUAL % 70T INDUSTRY 60 35 -25 -2 -0.1 MINING CONSTRUCTION 2,910 4,395 11485 2,313 106 165 4.3 6.7 MANUFACTURING 7.130 9.443 569 41 1.6 TRAN COMM & UTIL 1.371 16,800 1,940 28,780 11,980 856 34.6 TRADE FIN INS & R.E. 4,020 6.466 2,446 12.600 175 900 7.1 36.4 SERVICE 12,246 6,998 24,846 10,230 3,232 231 9.3 GOVERNMENT TOTAL: 51,535 86,135 34.600 2.471 100.0 % Source: U.S. Department of Labor. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Alfred Gobar Associates. 35 000503 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT III-20 MOST RECENT CHANGES IN EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS COACHELLA VALLEY, CA Employment: v Nonagricultural Wage and Salary Date Employment Change Most Recent 1992 87,315 Annual Averages 1,559 1991 88,884 Most Recent 7/93 86.135 204 _ Dates Available 7/92 86.339 4/93 87,394 •845 4/92 88,239 1 /93 86,280 -1,898 1 /92 88.178 Building Permits: Average Units Value ISOOOI Permit Value Date Total SF MF Total SF MF Total SF MF 1990 3,013 757 3,770 $399,908 $61,533 $461,441 $132,728 $81,285 $122.398 1991 1,633 563 2,196 216,672 36,227 252,899 132,683 64,346 115,163 1992 2.267 268 2,535 294,737 20.097 314.834 130,012 74,989 124,195 1/93 - 9/93 1,218 114 1,332 143,748 9,523 153.272 118.020 83,537 115.069 1/92 - 9/92 1,777 193- 1,970 219,765 17,386 237,152 123,672 90,085 120.382 1/91 - 9191 1,284 325 1,609 165,695 21,076 186,670 128,968 64.848 116,016 Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics _ U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Census Alfred Gobar Associates COACK.MAC 36 unroa 000504 X LU Z t� z Q W 0 0 z D U 2 Q } _ 0 W N Q J . Q _ r � a y X u.l w z w U z a W U J \QJ CI•^I V z_ O Q W AGA DEMAND INDEX o rn co rn to in v m rq Ln ul a v a v a 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 / , S r r r 1 r / , 0 p O O O 0) 0 cc000 to _ .X3CNI 3nl`dA JNISnOH Nb'1a3W u 1 £66l dAl III u I Z66L At III II I L661 At Ill I 1 0661. At 111 it 1 6861. At III If I 886L At III if I 486L At II If I S86L At III It I S861 At III 11 I Vest At 111 11 I E86L ON3'bk Z861 ON3'11k L86L ON3*Uk 086 L Sf1SN30 0861 X w 0 Z_ 0 Z LU LU Q Q i t X w 0 Z w J Q 0 Z V) D O_ y Z Q O w 37 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES CHAPTER IV RECENT MARKET ACTIVITY In order to lend real -world perspective to the economic simulations described in Chapter III, the Consultants reviewed data from The Mevers Group Report regarding condominium and tract sales activity in Coachella Valley for the first six months of 1993. The weekly sales rates were annualized to produce the following tabulation of the pattern of sales: Annualized Sales Price Rance Attached Detached Total Less than $80,000 28 124 152 S 80,000 - 90,000 None 175 175 90,000-100,000 11 183 194 100,000-110,000 17 I50 167 110,000-120,000 5 125 130 120,000-130,000 41 138 179 130,000-140,000 96 178 274 140,000-150,000 69 109 178 150,000-160,000 10 86 96 160,000-170,000 9 14 23 170,000-180,000 10 68 78 180,000-190,000 6 29 35 190,000-200,000 9 36 45 200,000-225,000 39 74 113 225,000-250,000 42 6 48 250,000-275,000 44 51 95 275,000-300,000 None 31 31 300,000-350,000 37 14 51 350,000-400,000 25 25 400,000-450,000 29 29 450,000-500,000 37 37 500,000-550,000 3 3 550,000-600,000 2 2 600,000-700,000 4 4 700,000-800,000 None None 800,000 and Over 15 15 Annual Total 473 1,706 2,179 J 38 00C5'iG ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES The observed data was compared with the theoretical estimates of absorption potential for stick -built housing by price range under a "normalized" assumption regarding economic conditions as follows: Annualized Percent Projection (Normal) Actual Current of Price Ran ae Cumulative Cumulative Estimate Less than $100,000 495 495 521 521 105.3 $100,000 - 125,000 505 1,000 386 907 90.7 125,000 - 150,000 450 17450 541 1,448 99.9 150,000 - 175,000 445 1,895 158 1,606 84.7 175,000 - 200,000 440 2,335 119 1,725 73.9 200,000 - 225,000 200 2,535 113 1,838 72.5 225,000 - 250,000 160 2,695 48 17886 70.0 250,000 - 275,000 100 2,795 95 1,981 70.9 275,000 - 300,000 60 2,855 31 2,012 70.5 300,000 & Over 690 3,545 166 2,178 61.4 Up to prices of $150,000 a unit, new home sales in Coachella Valley currently are reasonably similar to the long-term projections of absorption potential. Sales in the $250,000 to $275,000 price range, which includes a large proportion of condominium units, were within 5.0 percent of the long-term average annual absorption projection. Overall, however, sales of housing priced over S275,000 a unit fall well below the projections of potential projected to be supportable with economic recovery. Single Family Housin The map in Exhibit 1V-1 identifies the locations of the projects on which the empirical data are based. The second fastest selling project as would be expected is Sun City. Rancho Del Oro was also selling very well at the time of the survey - 1,446- square -foot units selling for $64.52 per square foot, or $92,977 a unit. Summer Place (an Inco project) was also selling well at an overall rate of 2.13 units per week for competitively priced single family detached housing. With the 39 000507 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES exception of Del Webb's Sun City, the only fast selling project priced significantly over $100,000 a unit was Laguna De La Paz II. Exhibit IV-3 compares the characteristics of the fastest selling floor plans with the characteristics of the slowest selling plans, showing that average price of the fastest selling floor plans tends to be less than $100,000 a unit. The fastest .selling floor plans priced $80,000 to. $90,000 a unit are priced somewhat higher in terms of price per square foot than the slowest selling floor plans in this price range. These units average 1,100 square feet and sell for $71.14 per square foot. In the S80,000 to $90,000 price range, the fastest selling floor plans are priced more than the slowest selling floor plans, although they are a little lower priced per square foot. In the S90,000 to $100,000 price range, the fastest selling floor plans are larger than the slowest selling floor plans and are priced less per square foot by a considerable margin. In the $100,000 to $110,000 price range, the fastest selling floor plans are larger than the slowest selling floor plans and priced less per square foot. Low price per square foot appears to be associated with above -average market performance in the lower price ranges. When the comparisons are based on the size of units, the fastest selling floor plans in almost every case are lower priced than the slowest selling floor plans; i.e., a lower price per square foot. This is generally true up to floor plans of 2,250 square feet. The most effective combination of price and unit size results in an average sales price between $60.00 and $70.00 per square foot as shown below: 40 ooc-5 0 ALFRED LOBAR ASSOCIATES Sales Rate Per Week Price Per Sq. Ft. Averaze Per Plan Total All Plans Less than $60.00 . 0.12 0.24 $60.00 - 69.99 0.30 8.7 70.00 - 79.99 0.11 6.5 _ 80.00 - 89.99 0.10 5.3 90.00 - 99.99 0.15 6.5 - 100.00-124.99 0.09 4.1 125.00-149.99 0.06 . 1.3 _ 150.00-174.99 0.05 0.5 175.00-199.99 0.05 0.05 _ Among units priced $60.00 to $70.00 per square foot, the fastest selling floor plans average 1,413 square feet and sell for an average $65.14 per square foot, or an overall average price of $91,915 a unit. As shown in Exhibit IV-3, average price per square foot for floor plans selling more than 0.6 units per week per floor plan is less than $70.00. Data regarding the number of units authorized for construction and aggregate building permit valuation for new units authorized for construction (from Chapter III) -R have been rearranged to identify the areas in Coachella Valley in which the bulk of low-priced single family detached housing is currently being developed. These comparisons are as follows: Average Permit Value Per Unit 1992 Sinele Familv Mufti -Family Total Rank Rank Rank Palm Springs $195,555 3 $65,500 3 $182,550 3 Palm Desert 187,125 4 99,475 1 171,633 4 -- Indian Wells 328,050 1 None 328,050 1 ' Rancho Mirage 313,290 2 None 313,290 2 Cathedral City 128,967 5 88,194 2 123,808 5 Desert Hot Springs 90,990 8 52,200 4 67,750 10 _ Indio 79,735 9 None 79,735 8 Coachella 78,791 10 None 78,791 9 La Quinta 106,560 6 None 106,560 6 s; - _ Unincorporated 98,195 7 None 98,195 7 41 000509 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES .:a The lowest average permit value per unit for single family units authorized for construction in Coachella Valley in 1992 was in the City of Coachella, followed by Indio, Desert Hot Springs, the unincorporated area, and La Quinta, in that order. Attached For -Sale Housing Exhibit IV-4 is a map showing the locations of the attached for -sale housing projects for, which data was taken from The Meyers Group Report. As illustrated in Exhibit IV-5, the fastest selling attached product is The Villas with an average price of $181,130 a unit, followed by Palm Royale with an average price of S106,091. The third fastest selling project is Deane Homes with units priced $259,790 a unit. The - attached housing market in Coachella Valley is not as price sensitive as the detached market, suggesting that the best selling attached product is probably second homes. Exhibit IV-6 illustrates this relationship in another format. The average price of the floor plans selling more than one unit per floor plan per week is more than the average price of floor plans selling between 0.4 and 0.5 units per week. The attached market in Coachella Valley is more likely to be supported by the second home market than a low-priced alternative to single family detached housing for primary home buyers. This is probably because lot prices in Coachella Valley do not give attached housing a significant price advantage over detached hOLIsing except in very low price ranges. Comparisons of sales rate per week per floor plan by price range for attached housing and detached housing in the sample are as follows: 42 000510 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES ' Sales Per Week Per Floor Plan Attached Detached "- Best Best Price Range Average Selling Plans Average Selling Plans Less than $80,000 0.18 0.43 0.34 0.66 $ 80,000 - 90,000 None 0.28 0.47 90,000-100,000 0.11 0.22 0.32 0.65 • 100,000-110,000 0.11 0.22 . 0.16 0.26 110,000-120,000 0.05 0.10 0.12 0.19 120,000-130,000 0.13 0.21 0.14 0.22 1302000-140,000 0.37 0.80 0.18 0.31 140,000-150,000 0.66 1.18 0.11 0.25 150,000-160,000 0.10 0.20 0.11 0.21 160,000-170,000 0.09 0.09 0.03 0.06 In the lowest price ranges, detached product sells considerably faster than attached housing in the same price ranges - up to prices of $130,000 to $140,000 a unit. These relationships suggest that currently detached housing is the most effective way to exploit the market for low-priced product in Coachella Valley. F:UPMMSVtHsr,C0zA n-.6sr 6. 1"3%9 43 OU('511 ALFRED GOSAR ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT IV-1 NIAP OF SINGLE FAMILY DETACHED PROJECTS SURVEYED JUNE 1993 COACHELLA VALLEY (MAP TO BE INSERTED LATER) 44 0005121 O W F N n n Q Q m •` QW C O NN wM N N M ^N N M N N M nN �mm tow O�MnnrN mN QN nN mN oNf mN yN y n 0 M 0 0 m m wm UWWrvn ID O +Nm m N n m COwmm wOmn 0 nnCD Nm� n NN.Nw >ay N N N Q m nNmminm nmwQmnrwNnw mm Oin Ne7 inQn0rQat7rNe'!m nNe70O G W y~, Q 1� n m Q m r N n n N Q 0 N y m n O w• m N N N N y n n N w m w O m In �'7 O n _- W y 0 r n N r ^ N ry N r .-� n r r eV py r N Q r N r r H wz n% r r G W m m 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n O O O m n 0 0 O m n 0 N o m N n 0 0 g O O n 0 0 O N O W W W n O m m Q Q m m Om O A O N m ,Q„ n y O Q Q O w y ,y n O N n In n Q p y Q n m m n W d g N N O Q N m N N o p y m m n n v m n N n O N n n n n L1 n m 0 O m m In O Q O r d N N N N N �,„ N!m nnQnm Omm�Q nn^ ' (� W J N r r Q Q N 0 n V to y N N N Q Q Q Q n _ Q G m 0 N � n r e Q e 0 � .-. N N O a � � g e m n Q^ N � y Q 0 0 O Q Z H d Z N m N O 0 LL 0 m o„O m w a U T n r Q v r n r n m^ r y n n m a n Q n N Q n n r n r a O N n N y N N N r r W r� Q 0 G Z O< n�ain of Q W Nan mm�QeQnQinQ QnIn aNQynQlnnnnneQQ QnnQQ * O J X Z LL a L LJ Q ~ C W Z f- Z a r J e O a W r N O ¢ O y O w d rZ- m O Z Y z cc W Q O C U 0. w} > C U M ¢a M W W O Y� Z Q ¢¢ wCwuLLJyiy Q dwUNw� wniorOaN UMaoa W OO W UC¢7I=wo L O m 2 `L U _ a U C drn O m U w O D o aO J > WO>0 0ZC>0 Oy W O,y U=Yy �UU T O a U W W_= U O Y u 'D p O W U G O W O a0 ] C i y a O S} �-` Z~ O N C w E• n W C7 m y G>} S W d= G U LL O W Y Y y yy>= d Q Z a J Q C s Z G Q O¢ j _ S W o m w W S 5 » w y w O O G G O Y Z W N F Q O C U F J O H -Qi Q 0. Q G ^2 W Z O W LL /- F• Z C _H U d U F G J C W Z Z w W Z Q H d J J Z O Z O C S J_ dODZZZZJ_ C C 0 7 m Q W U O G W W W O S G G U d G O F- W O u 0 3 W 6 W G Z Q G G Q C Q d G V O W H y V F y p? C Y U U Y y 3 m U Q N 0. N y 0 0 0 LL LC O U 3 7 U 0 U y H U J 0 0 0 O y W .. ' W W y y0 y OZ E N y y} Y y O O y} W O J S O� d�W O y _ Z� Z� G W 1 r u U &- i y¢ z 0. O W W G G Z W O ~ i G W z G w U J W d W d 0 W 3cc = W V G W y J W G y O t_ Y j S W uyi Z y y 2 ? O Z O y Z a Q Q Y G G W yJj ~ O W O O d U J G Z O d d Q LL W H H Z j 6 w G U 1- O ItZ„ O� W H H G W J O G y G¢WM > W H d W 0 O O> O 0. �_ 0: G M Z Q U W y y N ~GO ZZ2O-� J f 0=¢ UQ W Wy'wG�QGW OZW OOw200 Wu+ZW y Q4= s. V}} Q W y J U> J J? 3 d J d y 1L g C U O LL y Z W O S U C F F- O tL O O J J U r N n Q In n n m m 0 - N n Q Nnn m w 0 rNn d V n n m w O N n Q N n n m m 0 n» r rrrr+r.. r r NrvNN rvrvry NNN n e7 n n n n n ne�ef Qv N 0 W O d a 45 000513 Q 7 N C: o U v w v N 0 J Q CCO 1 x W Lw 0 V5 U1 W rl n n b n < CQ'f n N m 1If y N m N a O m m o 0 LL n O rc O m m m a n m e y N w w w N w N N N N N N N N N w N N N N N N N LL O s a e n y m L7 Q m n n a l7 y N Q N m Q N y0 In�nm OmILI n mneemm � OyvCINO O W O N n O n O n n y n n 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 n 0^ 0 0 m p Ww elna oaonac,m�ooa$nu+oaoamo 0 Q y p O Q y y N N n m Ill l'1 y N N m N y OI V Q Q n WQ mN _ en mNI�NllQmQ�^m O m Nmeonaan0OQay m 0 > N Q M N N N N M N M N N M N N M N JmmmnQenN00000000 J < 3 H d d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o d d d 6 d d c d o 0 0 _+ n < N O O y O m N O n m 0 0 0 ^men m^ Z H_ < J Z < 7 f.. LL a 0 O o N m y m n a 0 00 Q Q n n Q O Q m m Q n n Q Q N n Q m y n n n Q e a N O J y $ LL i - C r O p w J Z r ❑ J t7 < r r r w Z r < w < r N y Z Z y Z i .rL W W W W Y w d W d G. U f W Z O r W W O C a W < C d a r< a J U U Z O i a J W Y Q Z r W O O N d O W g p J W p w 6 O U j a y z a0 w w p i W w C U Q> w 2 U 0 0 Q C o ❑rW-UU Q �J= a e ¢>OO�C w wZ U W w> U W CO C7 Q❑ y Y w Z W e a C w W Z 7 Q Q p❑ J y❑< W Q W y H JpN20 W SpCrLd Q p ❑�p0 W Q u L O^ e t ❑ _O W Ur ❑ Q y O Q Q W Z W Z _L Q W Q O Y T s r Q Z E❑ Y U 0 3 z z W 4< 2 O U M Q a u 'L i a T ❑ m V y Y m J Z Q G Z O J 6 U Q W W O Z T J J Z 3 Q O Q O--<< L o xr�33omJ�3>smoorJ�3auu? r > r U 0 W F i r Q W r W y e C C r W 2` Q N y Q W w = Q Q ? O V p a C W y Q y W C.7 Z Q O S O W < ❑_ Z Z> C 3 p N Q❑= 6 W W Q W r Q L W ZtfA cc r 6Uy¢ y .. u Q 2 NOH�1Q-ZOZ¢=Ofy <0QSQ0< � H -C < Q Q O Z y Q y0-j Z Y Y<❑ d U r o UJSC C Z00 J Z V)u cc Z J2 W 2 Z < O <> 5 f O i N Q m N J W L S N J d U1 w J S i o d ;) > W W N n' e y m n m m 0 N N n c y a n m m 0 N n Q o Q Q e e e e e a a m m Y a y Y N 10 a a a m a z > > e y Z M 000514 N Z g O O J LL 0 Z J J W cn a� cn O y Z J J ad �//- M ~_ Y� cr n 00 S J LL X LL LL U CD J Z J Z Cn {L cc 0 w N LL LL O h U_ N LLJ U� I.N a c _ U r m n n 0 m m O Q p Cf e d N 0 /m7 r m m n m 1� n fNU n r m r H N n P to in m N e mn nm mw mw mw Ow m0 0 0 Q r m m 0 n ^ Gom n n m w w N w N m �nnnmn w w w w w N w N w w w w w N w N w N w w N N w N w w w • m m o m n_ m o m r o e N N N O m o N^ e d m e n m .- n m e e m e r m n o m O^ O m m m N m It Q N C1 O O^ N N N Cl Q N {7 Q N C Q Q m w^= Q O111 ^ m m m^ m N ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^1Omg"M oOn -one�mo^o m''"f N^'Omomn momonnMemmN 12O e r m m O °f O m e n m n o m m O O O m m CO m N n m N N o m d b N tG ri m l'1 m e n m 0 m I[I �J o m r Q ni N m f7 N m n o m m Q 0 0 0 ^ ^ N N N A t'1 A O O< 10 m m m m m m'mm _ ^mmm N N N N N M N H H r. W w wmm m -- - ^ N M N N N M N M N M N M N N N N N N w N N N N N M o e m of m m�M o C O O O O C G O O O C C G O O C O O G O O C C O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^ O O O O O nm NQ mn of ee<n mrm',r e�nO�'7 mr N ^ �'1 m m n m N m e O n N m A N mn ry M O Cf m 0 r ONI te`I !V CS Q O^ Q Q N m �rfNmmN^� n�nc'mm�in inmmm000mmmmmm°inmOmmmQ'7 ^ ^ ^ m ^ ^ ^ 0 0 0 Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y a O Q O Q O V O O y O y O y O y O y O m 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 o e 3 3 o> o> O> O > O> e y i?> e O> e OLLNOLL N OLL NOLL VI OLLNOLL NOLL00 00LLN C Lda` i a° a°ia OLLm < s m m m m m m m m m m m m m m �y o m m m m m m m m m m m v 8 m m m n a 0N 0 Q m mnm�a mm ^ N N w N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N N N N a008 Ba 0«0<00m0 7 0$$$ g 0 g 2S o o od0000c.- Q N 7 Q m m m O Q 0 0 LL] Q a 47 aoosi;'-)- N n 0^ O N n n 0 n N y n n m O tl y n tl N y y m Q^ m O Q^ n m A 0 m n tl Q m r m y N Co tl n O N n m _to mn mn etlytl n nNOmoo.-000—eov m^ eoe tv Nn nne n nm10Qtl N N M N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N M N M N N N N N M N M N N N O m N n N Of n r tl O n 01 N Of m O n y Q r {(1 m m O tl n N O O ^ N r N r O ^ rn O rn •� O eV n N l•I N N n n n N 1(1 r n O C1 r n m GI Vi' "^ N m N n Q e n r n • m 'n N N N 4 N N N N N n n n n n i•1 :•I n :•% n n mn���ye m m m OreennO my •'+nnNenn ro O n O '�O n O O O y O O O nnn m mm_m ma 0 00 nna cr vN mma w1N4 etivnn w envrm m •tlo neovnn o . N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N M N N N M N N M N M _ evmemnmennNntn m�enn rnernrn NnOa o n N 0 0 0 0 0^ e`• O ^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 0^ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 6 O O O 06 0 0 O O O 06600000000000666666660 0 0 O m m m r 0 y e^ r m ^^ ,D y m n N O i!1 1.'1 O N n emv n O en'e n e'e ^ tl^ tl^ • • O tl r m y n r n tl r o n a y n o n tl o tl m n N N a m Q en m o tl en � r n n o r � o^ r? N � m n �� N m en ^ n N^ o e n n n m tl^ ^• ^ 0 o y' e y o� y T o m o y m= y e l! m tl m e Q o n m m m N m n n n N N -•. C C 0 a= O Cp C C uN o qo!y=oa yCoC` CyLLq`q NyC3 3 q c Yo > yO ONiOLLuUoIO0 m m a+ O1 m m r m m °1 m m m p m N N m m m Q N m m m n m m m m m Q A m m m N m rn Q M m m m m M m m m m Q N m m m eri m N m m m m M » » 0 25 0 o m N N » m o R N g N o N E m o $ o g g o y $ $ o la g g 48 000516 N Z Q J LL O O J LL U Z J J W _ �yy uj Q U c J G N y y Z N 4' Q Z z C J Q C..)O. cn O O i � p o LL U. J Z Q J _ � W u Z V) w cc 0 W w LLL LL O U_ W U Q 2 -- U 3 ^ Q m N r Lorin v s e ^ ^ N p m m r M n _, y m N N N m Q m Q O N n r O o Q m^ N Q m Q m Pf O m m $ Q m N N Q n 001 C) Q m A O y m m N N ^ N N n ui 10 i7 y m tD O Q m O^ ^• N p^ p .v ^ tp Q m Q t7 N n m m^ Q y Lei y c n fc ci min vi ui a m m Ql m r m m M m m m m m m m m m Y N m N N M N N p N N M M N N N M N N 1 N N N N N N p N. N N N N N O r^ ^ n N A m m m m m m ^^ - Q) q pl ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ — ^ N N N N N N N N N N N N l7 CI N P1 ri A Q QS Qp m O o m m m m m Q Q O m Q O m tf m O e N_ m C O m r 0 6 m A Q n Q m m ei ^ ri m ai ri V; ^ ^_' r G O S S y m m m m N N N N N N n n N Q 0 10 Q y LO y y y r n m^^^^ N N N N ...... p ...... N N N^ ^^ ..... N ....... N N M m N n n m m o m o m m e r ti O O Q O O y O O^ O 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O 0 0 0 ^tom o NQ O Nc7O^ NO _ ^ O C O O C o o o o o 6 6 G O 6 6 C O O C C G G G o C G O O C O 6 6 C 6 6 ^^ O n O1 y e e w m m n m tN'1 0 v O r b O e O n N C m y m e H Q mQ vNrru�^�nQ^nN^<n N^ NN ^ N 0 N'�'^ r' m m m m H^ o m e Q m m m m Q Q n^^ O Q N N Q N O fA y y y N y_ y N y C b O C y W �3Y 3 0>3c>O a 3cp> ra G3 > Y3 0a >V u_ 2 > 0y0 m0LLOLL m O O LLw ui 0LL0 3 O LL m w z Z Q cc m W m m m m m A Q m m m m N Q m Q m N Q n m Q m Q o ^ o O o S y o y o in $ $ o O l'1 n e 8 N 49 000517 Vz, g a s O O J ILL V z J J W N W Q 3 O N Z N agc J d c� a C"I 00 O LL �. J (7 z C7 a J t s _ 2 W p >� z fA > e taJ E W{ p LL Y ^ yr cn o r o;> LLJ LL x w Coi -I LL O U_ N CC W O Q r Q > > Q 6 2 S L) dNw PO Am mP nmONnNm mNNP Nm ONO nN N� m N N m m P^N O m N N n to co bO bto 11P m O O m In ci 6 L! I.: L6 6 64644 7 uiS^ b b N P b bnm m. w. A — ...Nw w w w w w Y w w N w N r w w» w r N w w w P m �'7NPOmbmmmo^tn Nmo amnn n o o comb in Sm b n m l7 o n b m n m m m m O N^ n m O m n m m b•' " in co n N a P N^ _^_ _ 1_^_ ^ N N N N N n N n N n N n O P P c00 00 0S PnNNvo^mnfP 000 g 8S om m o 0 ^ 9 0) m A of 0 ui m b In m O m P P m m M M o C Od oSSo _ O O n b q y ON MO u1 m O N P e� O L•1 P^ N n O m n of m P p� b N m ^ N V1 O N b O m n 0 0 O 000 C O O C O C C C O C O C C C O O O C C C O G O G O O C C O C O O ON^ OOO�nerOPmmPnbnPnN^mmNnP^P »ino n bo P to n mmbomNPoomu+�p, ,.� ^o n n `r o 0 o P o� o^ e n ^ NOI ^ o n �` m c u C n^ N � '- N .• 1[1 N N m N N P N P N N E C e O o c p o a v a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o u o n tl c._ Coo Coo c_ = Nm u y O y O m e m T a c O OO e> `0> p> V 3 a O: r> ye $3 LLwp LL NOO0 O LL O 0 LL OLL0 O`NODO LL U H O e a U N m et m O m O pC d ai of r p > O 01 A m m N P N > G C O i � i � � S 0 ga .p. .O.•' .nr .n+ .p+ m g S g g $ SR $ $ S G u n On m m g to w g a u V w w N w w w w � u w Y w N 2 U. 0 c uj Q a 50 000518 ALFRED GOBAR ASSOCIATES EXHIBIT IV-4 MAP OF ATTACHED PROJECTS SURVEYED JUNE 1993 COACHELLA VALLEY (MAP TO BE INSERTED LATER) 51 000519 U n m m m O N e N N W H m OOi n N m N N O = Q M N N N N N Y Y n ^ O d N O m N O n N m W CD LL S NCO Om. A O e v O m voi Le d y m N n N^ N^ ^ N ^ ^ N ^ ^ ^ Q O^ O O O pp O n n m O n C O 0 0 n b m m W C7 w W n m m� N e C Q C m a m m O Of O m e n m n m ,D a n m N > Q N N N N N N ^ N M N M N M Mp M c- C7 W n 0 0 m r b < Zr J Q d ^ O O n O n O N N m n �y m J Z Q � O C m m O m N N n n a m e N m n N n a ^ N O O W 00Z n e N a e < a i Z r r Z y W N J o W Z O G O J W C r } Q O m } J y a W O C } Q i } Q W a LL N > p E O Ui W N 1 O S p 2 W W N m J Q 3 O w O U U 7 U> o a W O O to CL gL e m W> S W w 6 N U 3 o C !-• r W 7 O L 1 r J i 2 Q C Z J J Z W Z u O T m W p W W Q 7 LC Q Q p Q O L 6 F r o � u e _ y O Q J C O Q U W LL V O > Q Q Q G C O W a Q J W W h r N W > D y Q o G 7 r Q W 2 a U 0 O i Q} J O S Q �_ O U y W Q Q Z Q w J r O Y U F Q Q > Z Q N Q Q= W O Q O u Q O W d O `i d y> 1 O? N O U n V 6 e W W e ^ 7 N Z N y 52 000502'0 e _ Cn ZQ J ._ tc O O J LL / V Z J J W CL LLI Q O J N p N Z N to Z a Q I a d J a 00 O O J _ U- LL. w JLLJ Z J z W W 0 w LL) < Ci LL LL O 0 _U F^ _N L W U Q Q — U Q � uj ao mOm NN n�..mmnmQmm O00nm°�o mNmmnOnO°�Q in m O e N �. Ilf m m p N N N m Q m 0 0 m m • O e N e °1 � m L•1 f': N Q O n l7 N_ L'1 ti) C N C1 O n I'1 Q O O �"0 N {(1 QI {(1 O O m 0 O , unlit mmn�0rr�^�r^..rrmr^^^�r�r rnr oN Cl001nOOmInO O C S �Om� Smem nm OSMo m0 O w w;;M ID m m m O n n 0 o e m O e o O O n m m o O a r% m e n m O N e m IO m Ln P1 m^ e ' m m l0 Ilf Ln 1l1 Q N m m m e Ilf m^ N O N m n Q O• 4tf e W PI m O O O O N N N O n n e Q Q N N ul m m m n • H m m o m el e N M N N N N N r r r N N N M M N w r M M N N N N N N w N N N N w w w r N p pC S r N O^ N O O O .• N O m m O m m r- N p 0 0 O- N n e N C C C O O^ e C C O O O O C O O O O O C O 0 0 0 0 0^ O G C C C C O C O w ��w r Q n rmn0 �'+� o o HOO mo m10O^ee O in 011lN r ^O m rinnl.mn Q N O Ill r N mm l'10 Om 17mOrne min�ennOm nb"'e f^, r m N M m N m N LL] 0 Q r elnr^ n O O m m r Q n ^ ^ .-. r N r^ r•^ 0 0 0 C o G� G L c �_ O N m VI ON° O° O p ON N N ° O% O p O O 0 N N N 0 3 3 3 3 3 3 `° o a u p` a✓ `° i y `° a `v n e o 7 0 p a y o a y a a= o y `o 3 a 0 >p op>°> OwOLLm 0LL00LL0 0LL1 OLLm O o LLa Vf O m O Z l/O LL OLLm Q m m m 0 m 0 m m 0 O o m o m m m m 0 m m w$ 0 m 0 m 0 0 m 0 m m Ll m 0 0 p G O 0 O ^ N el Q ^ n N Q a « N » 0 0 0 0 O N w w N » » w N P B 2 2 a 000000 00 8 o 8 8 o dodder C $ S O o d d o d w g w w w » w w w rl m w w 53 000521 N Z Q a J LL V Z J J W u2 QcGc 0 G in % Z L) O J Q m ay a w CL 0 O 0 J LL LL Q zm LLJ Z cn LLI cr 0 w W CL LL. LL N U_ F W U Q .. Q T U n O m O N mseu<i r � Lei eir-: rimGa�ci oi'N�ar,.a N N M N N N M H N N N N N .r mNm 15Nn vmonm m n N O • r r O C Cl n Q 111 n N N N N ^^^^ N^ N N a to ��OOO n ��Om 00 q mmmn0ONc�mvauf A y1 Q1 n O • m 0 �`+ O r r OO ^ Q n Q o m n N n N N M N N N N r O N O N n^ N N^ O^ O p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 {[I • N N O N N O N N O N^^ .. 1 ! � n^^ Q N N m Q Q ^nOnnmmQme�Nmro�o p n e O m^ O^ m LEI Q1 m Q O r Q m^ n P+ N r m O^ O N m^ N 0 O n pp n^ m^^ O N N N O! N A N N N M N N N N N N N N N M A M A M A N N N veennmm�Q�+-m 0 w moNQn mn����mm mneQno�n m ono--amoo-o nnn u��mmmm^N^non m m$o$ m 000 n v a Ome o'r"ai Ninm m m0 mrno".^`''�'o <r Nm-N«nmr menmo N r O m v r n O 0 e Q O c m m 0 nto n O^ O N N N n n< m m r N N N N N N N N n N M N N N» N N N N N N M N N M M N N N N M M N O G ry< O p N O N e 0 n O n w O N N O m N 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 60004600000 m O to p `o `u 7 `o `u, 3 •�• ; a 3 `o ; 2; i w; u q 0> •" O> '� O i a 0> a$ > a> e> e 0> e 0> 0 0 > O a e O �y, y O LL N O LL V1 O LL N O LL N O LL N LL N O LL fN O LL Vf O LL N O LL N O LL N O LL N W 0 Z m c c+ w I N m m c+ �' m v m m N e m n N N a a r o O m N e m N Q N > N O C1 ^ ^ ^ ^ M N N N O r m N N N N y � = � � •�. O C O C O O G N 8 tP O O O J 1[f CO^� 0^ N (O] N 0 N 0 p 8 Of N N e0y {� N N M N N 54 000522 cn Z a J O O J 'L'L^ V Z. J J W Cn [L W ca � G 0 N 7 y, Z Z O Q a dn 1 O 0 0 W LL F- 0 CO < Z LO Z U) w 0 ul W (O CL LL LL 0 N U_ LU W U a a U i nN000I Qlnn __8 0! 0! Om mro m Lei m o nNOeO O rV:a C OmN m�nmr ui ^� nNn _�eonrinm H H M H M H M H H H H H •Ci Nlil Nm N NO n 01'e mn 01e N m n N Q m n Q m r It1 n co to n G m n n N m n e ^ . _ m�O Nn0000OnrmO�u+tlS O T n Q m n Od a� N tD r of O� O woo O C l'1 n CI ti Oi m u1 Q r 1� of G td O; N H N H N N N M N H M M N H H N N m0 N e O n�q O 0 0 0 S O O O O G O C O O 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 C n 0 m H O i 0 mn aQ� 0In m e -Qn u c .rNN O O o n r N mn nm ee �. E n e o u o G C o o C o C C C C n • C � O � Y Y _ 0 3 7 3 ; `o a n j _ yiOLLNOLL O N OLLN OLLN OLL N LL Y O V Y F LL a y a a N � A en m m < W QI e T U O> d m N N w O tl O S c o S c « it w w w w 0 55 00051?3 L05 ANGELES 333 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE L05 ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90071-3197 CENTURY CITY 2029 CENTURY PARK EAST LOS ANGELES. CALIFORNIA 90057-3026 SACRAMENTO 400 CAPITOL MALL SACRAMENTO. CALIFORNIA 95814-4407 SAN OIEGO 750 B STREET SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101-4605 SAN FRANCISCO ONE MONTGOMERY STREET, TELE5IS TOWER SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA 941C4-4505 MENLO PARK 3000 SANG HILL ROAD, BUILDING I MENLO PARK, CALIFORNIA 94025 DALLAS 1717 MAIN STREET DALLAS, TEXAS 75201-7390 DENVER 1801 CALIFORNIA STREET DENVER, COLORADO 50202-2694 SEATTLE 999 THIRD AVENUE SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98104-7089 WRITER'S OIRECT DIAL NUMBER (714) 451-3894 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LAWYERS JAMBOREE CENTER 4 PARK PLAZA IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92714-8557 (714) 451-3800 FACSIMILE: (714) 451-4220 January 18, 1994 VIA TELECOPY AND U.S. MAIL The City Council City of La Quinta Post Office Box 1504 La Quinta, CA 92253 Re: Proposed zoning Ordinance Changes Dear City Council Members: JA5. A. GIBSON, 1852-1922 W. E. DUNN. 1561-1925 ALBERT CRUTCHER. 1860-1931 NEW YORK 200 PARK AVENUE NEW YORK, NEW YORK 10166-0193 WASHINGTON 1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, N.W. WASHINGTON, O.C. 20035-5306 BRUSSELS AVENUE LOUISE 222 8-1050 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM PARIS 104 AVENUE RAYMOND POINCARE 75116 PARIS, FRANCE LONDON 30/35 PALL MALL LONDON 5WIY 51-P HONG KONG 8 CONNAUGHT PLACE HONG KONG TOKYO 1-1-3 MARUNOUCHI. CHIYODA-KU TOKYO 100. JAPAN AFFILIATED SAUDI ARABIA OFFICE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BUILDING P.O. BOX 15870 RIYADH 11454. SAUDI ARABIA OUR FILE NUMBER T 72589-00004 This firm represents PriMerit Bank, Federal Savings Bank ("PriMerit"), the owner of certain lots in Tract 23913, which your planning staff has been referring to as the Quinterra subdivision (the "Property"). PriMerit is attempting to sell the Property to Forecast Development (now The Forecast Group, L.P.) ("Forecast"). This firm also represents Forecast. Forecast submitted its plans for approval by the City. The City Planning Commission approved the plans, but it conditioned its approval upon compliance with a minimum house size of 1,650 square feet. That condition was not acceptable to Forecast and, if left in place, would defeat PriMerit's plans to sell the property to Forecast. Forecast therefore appealed to the City Council. On November 2, 1993, the City Council declined to rule on Forecast's appeal because of an interim ordinance adopted that day by the City Council imposing a moratorium on the issuance of building permits in narrow circumstances that applied only to the applications of Forecast and perhaps one other builder. The stated purpose of the moratorium was to enable the City of 00052A GIBSOIV, DUNN & CRUTCHER The City Council City of La Quinta January 18, 1994 Page 2 La Quinta to consider certain changes in the City's zoning ordinances. PriMerit and Forecast have been advised that the City Council intends to conduct a hearing on January 18, 1994, at 7:00 p.m., to consider a proposed change in the City's zoning ordinances that would limit the ability of property owners in single family residential subdivisions that have been partially built out to change the house sizes in those subdivisions. PriMerit and Forecast strenuously object to the enactment of such ordinance changes on the following grounds: 1. The proposed zoning change is a discriminatory measure designed to forestall the Forecast proposal even though building permits should have been issued to Forecast long before the moratorium was enacted. 2. The proposed changes in the zoning ordinances would violate California Government Code § 65961. All developments that have been partially built out must have a recorded final map, and PriMerit and Forecast are not aware of any final maps for such developments having been recorded more than five years ago. Therefore, the City is prohibited by Section 65961 from imposing new conditions on those developments which could have been imposed at the time of tentative map approval, and the proposed zoning ordinance is designed to do precisely that. 3. The proposed zoning ordinance would violate the rights of PriMerit and Forecast to due process and equal protection of the laws under the Constitutions of both the United States and the State of California. Forecast and PriMerit are entitled to have the City rule upon Forecast's appeal based upon the laws that existed before the proposed changes are put in place, and that law would require the City to remove all conditions relating to house size from the Planning Commission's approval of Forecast's plans. 4. Pursuant to California Government Code § 65961, PriMerit and Forecast are entitled to have Forecast's plans submitted for a ministerial plan check without further conditions being placed upon them. Insofar as the proposed zoning ordinance would defeat that result, it is illegal. 0005 1215 GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER The City Council City of La Quinta January 18, 1994 Page 3 Accordingly, PriMerit and Forecast urge a "no" vote on the proposed zoning ordinances. Thank you for your consideration of these issues. Very truly yours, T a )Ca - Edward L. Xanders ELX./dk cc: Paul L. Gale, Esq. (via telecopy) ona+ono.00e A 00 526 DEL WEBB CHLIF,CORF... i�:'_-�.:iai?; :'al F ..'- Del Webb CalifOMia January 18, 1994 Honorable Mayor and Members of City Council City of La Quinta 78-495 Calie Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 As a resident of the City of La Quinta I have reviewed the proposed amendments to Title IX, Planning and Zoning of the La Quinta Municipal Code and I am extremely distressed that the City has taken it upon itself to dictate such stringent requirements on the development community. I have reviewed the Riverside County BIA Chapter's comments and i am in full agreement with the BIA's position on all issues. What the development community can sell should not be dictated by City government, but should be allowed to fit within the realm of what the buyer desires. The design requirements placed on development community by these proposed amendments are far too restrictive. The variety in architectural and design types within any community is what creates the unique character and style for the city. For the City to become involved in dictating the color schemes and garage door types to the purchasing market is a travesty, Do you tell Wal-Mart what to put on its shelves? As is the case in the retail sale of any product, please let the development community construct and sell that which the buying community wishes to purchase and allow in your proposed amendments a flexibility that will provide for the market changes that make architectural design styles unique and ever Improving. As technology improves our building methods and we begin to use alternative materials driven by the market forces of individual building commodities (for example, !umber price increases) certain distinctly different architectural design changes will occur. The environmental benefits of these changes will be profound. Do not stand in their way with your proposed ordinance. I support the BIA recommendation with respect to minimum square footages within the R-1 Zone. Once again, let the market determine what sells. Thank you. Since ly, Paul Quill Land Development Manager Sun City Palm Springs Residence; 51245 Avenida Rubio �wr66wn ttrvC.T(m'�a Quinta C/�: i2 �uvu c.�uoi 1G11+l771_63M 00054'7 1',%A (31B)771 5V2 ROBERT L. PIPPIN VIRGINIA S. CRISTE MICHAEL A. CRISTE IRWIN L. GOLDS MARIE A BOCHNEWICH Law offices of CRUTE, CRETE & PIPPIN 77.564 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE SUITE 220 PALM DESERT, CA 92211 December 22, 199 Planning Commission City of La Quinta C/O Jerry Herman 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, California 92253 LC?.c. L) Airt) - iUL' L-, Ltf TELEPHONE: (619) 772-7100 FACSIMILE: (619) 772-7111 OF COUNSEL: LYN FISHER R;DEC "993 81 2 I ..,...` _. IAGUINIA C1YY OF p�,pNNING DLPAaSµc�„�,..s.. RE• MINIMUM HOUSE SIZE IN R-1 ZONING Dear Commission Members: I have recently been advised of your proposed action to raise the minimum house size in the City of La Quinta on a single family lot to 1400 sq.ft. Unfortunately, I shall be out of the area on the currently scheduled hearing date of December 28, 1993 so I have elected to make my initial comments to you in writing. In the first instance I would advise you that I live at 55020 Shoal Creek, La Quinta, California and am a citizen of your fair city. Secondly, the comments I make herein reflect my individual views and not necessarily the views of my law firm. I feel most strongly about the action you propose to take, and I apologize for the blunt comments that I shall hereinafter make. However, I truly believe your proposed actions are racist and or classist, and can only be described as a veiled attempt to keep the poorer classes of our citizens from purchasing housing in the City of La Quinta. Some of you may be aware that, in the past, I have built many homes in this valley. I am no longer in the development business. However, I do understand the development business, and the construction of houses, and have strong opinions on the continuing escalation of housing sizes in this valley. Simply put, there is no legitimate City or planning purpose for forcing the minimum house size to 1400 sq.ft. I make this comment based on the following facts: 1. There is no difference in the construction quality of a 1400 sq.ft. home and a 1100 sq.ft. home. The same type of construction practices are used and the same material is used; 20 In 90% of the cases there is no difference in the room count between a 1100 sq.ft. home and a 1400 sq.ft. home. Both homes generally have three bedrooms, two bathrooms, living room, dining room, kitchen and utility room. The only difference between t1p/pippin.101 00�)528 Planning Commission City of La Quinta December 22, 1993 Page 2 the two homes is the size of the rooms; 3. In most cases the street scape of 1100 sq.ft. homes and 1400 sq.ft. homes is the same. Builders generally build homes as wide as the lot will allow in order to improve street appeal, and adjust the depth of the house to increase or decrease the size of the house. Thus, from the street, both houses look basically identical. In short, the only reason to raise the minimum house size to 1400 sq.ft. is to increase: the cost of the house so that this poorer classes or races, "the riffraff" don't sully up the neighborhood. This type of action is simply indefensible on the part of a City, and particularly this City. The City of La Quinta in large part exists because of its hotels and golf course communities. These hotels and golf courses exist, for the most part, on the backs of our Hispanic work force. The City now proposes to tell these people that we appreciate their sweat and toil, but we do not want people of their type or economic class owning their own single family home in our fair city. "Work here, but take your old car and drive back to Coachella or Mecca to live". Over the years I have watched the phenomenon take over most cities in this State. As the city becomes larger and more successful it starts driving up house size to "attract a better class of people." This mentality is not proper city planning and is not proper city government. It is my hope that the City of La Quinta will have the wisdom to avoid this problem and not become a test case on the issue of whether making housing unaffordable to the poor or racial minorities by raising the minimum house size constitutes de facto discriminatory practice. Thank you very much for your attention. Very truly yours, CRISTE, CRISTE & PIPPIN By: Robert L. Pip h /rlp c1p/pippin.104 00057� OF re+t COUNCIL MEETING DATE: January 18, 1994 ITEM TITLE: Amendment to the Municipal Code Regarding Truck Routes and Restricted Routes on City Streets. SUMMARY: AGENDA CATEGORY: PUBLIC HEARING: BUSINESS SESSION: CONSENT CALENDAR: STUDY SESSION: Residents have requested that the City restrict truck traffic on certain streets. Staff investigated the existing Municipal Code and found insufficient authority in the Code to implement the requested restrictions. Therefore, it is proposed to amend existing sections of the Municipal Code that regulate truck traffic on City streets. FISCAL IMPLICATIONS: APPROVED BY: The estimated cost for the traffic control signs required to implement the new truck route system is $3,500. The Traffic Control Sign account has $5,000 budgeted, but is intended for maintenance and replacement of existing signage. Since this is an improvement expense, it is recommended that an additional $3,500 appropriation be made to this account from the General Fund's estimated available unreserved fund balance of $696,923. RECOMMENDATION: • Move to take up Ordinance by title and number only and waive further readings. • Move to introduce Ordinance on first reading and approve the Municipal Code Amendment regarding truck routes. • By Minute Motion 94 , move to direct staff to install the appropriate signs. • By Minute Motion 94 , move to appropriate $3,500 to the Traffic Control Sign account from the estimated unreserved fund balance for the General Fund. Somittfd by: Approved for submission to City Council: i Signature Robert L. Hunt, City Manager DC:RV ad 00053U 1 V: T4tiVI 4 4(4j QUI& MEMORANDUM 110norable Mayor and Members of the City Council FROM: David M. Cosper, Public Works Director DATE: January 18, 1994 RE: Truck Route Ordinances ISSUE: The issue for the City Council to consider is the proposal to adopt an ordinance that restricts truck traffic to certain streets. All mandatory notices have been published for sixty (60) days, pursuant to relevant state code sections. BACKGROUND: Residents have voiced concerns about truck traffic destroying the pavement of certain older streets. In particular, it has been pointed out that segments of Dune Palms Road and Westward Ho Drive are unsuitable for truck traffic. The pavement on these streets has deteriorated to a point that it is unable to support heavy truck traffic in excess of five tons. To prevent further deterioration to these street segments and other residential streets, action should be taken to reduce the amount of truck traffic on these streets to a minimum. The Municipal Code (Attachment A) currently does not provide sufficient authority to allow staff to respond to this request. The Code requires that an ordinance must first be passed which designates and describes any street or portion thereof' to allow truck traffic enforcement. It is proposed that the Municipal Code be amended to implement truck traffic regulations on City streets. The first amendment will establish truck routes within the City by designating a list of arterial and collector streets on which trucks in excess of three tons t must drive (Exhibit A, page 8). The second amendment provides an exemption to the Truck Route regulation for publicly operated transit vehicles. The third amendment will restrict vehicles exceeding five tons z from driving on certain arterial and collector streets vulnerable to damage if subject to daily truck traffic. However, vehicles may access these restricted streets to make pick-ups and/or deliveries (Exhibits C & D, pages 10 & 11). All residential and non -arterial streets not listed in either amendment will automatically have truck traffic prohibited unless the trucks have a specific delivery point in that area. The proposed code amendments will require truck traffic to stay on the City's TRUCK ROUTE SYSTEM which is essentially the arterial and collector street system established in the City's General Plan (Attachment B). The City's newer arterial streets are constructed with structural sections intended to accommodate truck traffic. Although the City's arterial and collector street system is not complete, it is preferred to keep the truck traffic on the arterials because they can structurally handle the heavy truck traffic. This effectively extends the life of residential streets. Finally, removal of truck traffic from residential streets is usually desired by the public because of the reduced noise pollution trucks can cause and eliminates conflicts between truck and residential traffic. A loaded half -ton pickup is three tons (6,000 lbs). Light duty trucks with no load would normally weigh less than three tons. 2. Loaded light duty trucks with a maximum cargo carrying capacity of two tons would normally weigh less than five tons (10,000 lbs). Light duty trucks are the trucks at the small end of the truck model spectrum such as trucks commonly used by small contractors and loaded three-quarter ton pickups. 000531 0 0 5 r� VV J 2 Currently, there are only two street segments recommended to prohibit use of the street by vehicles exceeding five tons (Attachment Q. These streets are: 1) Dune Palms Road from Miles Avenue to Star Flower Trail, and 2) Westward Ho Drive from Dune Palms Road to Jefferson Street. The pavement in these two areas is unsuitable to carry daily truck traffic. Truck traffic exceeding the weight requirement may access these streets only to make pickup or delivery on the weight -restricted street; emergency response vehicles are exempt. Trucks will be allowed to access non -Truck Route streets in the City only when the street is used as a direct route to and from a Truck Route street while making a pickup or delivery. This Code restriction will help preserve the City's residential streets which are designed and constructed to carry trucks on a very infrequent basis. The California Vehicle Code (Section 35701 et sec.) allows cities to establish maximum gross weight limits for any street under its exclusive jurisdiction and prohibit use of the street by any vehicle exceeding the adopted limit, except with respect to vehicles regulated by the California Public Utilities Code 3. The City's authority to regulate maximum gross weight limits on city streets is subject to the aforementioned Vehicle Code sections which require the City to conduct a public hearing following a 60-day advance public notice of the hearing that advise all interested parties of their right to present oral and/or written objections to the proposed restrictions. The mandatory notice has been published pursuant to the relevant State Code sections. Coordination with Other Agencies and Organizations Staff has contacted four other agencies and organizations and requested their comment on potential impact by the proposed Truck Route ordinance. The agencies and organizations that were contacted are: 1) Desert Sands Unified School District 2) Sunline Transit District 3) La Quinta Chamber of Commerce 4) Riverside County Sheriff Department Desert Sands Unified School District (DSUSD) - Staff met with school district representatives to discuss potential impacts of the proposed Truck Route System on existing and future bus routes. Staff pointed out likely impacts to existing or future bus routes: 1) Park Avenue (Avenue 50 - Calle Tampico), and Calle Tampico (Park Avenue to Washington street) 2) Westward Ho Drive (Dune Palm Road - Jefferson Street) Staff explained the reason why these streets were not recommended for inclusion on the Truck Route System. The subject segments of Park Avenue and Calle Tampico, though recently constructed, are not identified as arterial or collector streets in the City's General Plan, and as result, they were constructed with a structural section that cannot handle long-term daily truck traffic. Alternately, Westward Ho Drive is a collector street per the General Plan, however, the subject segment was constructed many years ago to a residential street standard and is currently in poor condition. Therefore, the City is proposing to prohibit use of this street to vehicles exceeding five tons until it is reconstructed with a more substantial street section in the future, at which time, it will be recommended for inclusion on the Truck Route System. 3. The exception provided in the Vehicle Code is limited to vehicles regulated by Sections 1031 to 1036, inclusive, of the Public Utilities Code, which are vehicles operated by a passenger stage corporation for compensation (e.g. buses for hire or fare, but not school buses operated on a free -fare basis). 000532 DSUSD staff acknowledged the impacts with complete cooperation and indicated they will revise their bus routes to avoid these streets. DSUSD inaugurated service on the revised routes the first school day after the holiday break. Staff advised DSUSD that buses on specific bus routes will not be restricted from using non -Truck Route streets when they have a specific pick-up or drop-off on that street, or if the residential street is the only non - Truck Route street to the bus stop location. Sunline Transit District - Staff also met with a Sunline representative to discuss potential Truck Route impacts on their existing or future bus routes. Most of Sunline's current bus routes are located on streets designated in the General Plan as arterial or collector streets. However in the Cove area, Sunline currently has one of its bus routes on residential streets. These streets are: 1) Calle Sinaloa (Avenida Bermudas - Avenida Obregon) 2) Avenida Obregon (Calle Temecula - Calle Sinaloa) 3) Calle Temecula (Eisenhower Drive - Avenida Obregon) Calle Sinaloa and Avenida Obregon are constructed with a thicker structural section than other residential streets in the Cove and will accommodate truck/bus loading. However, Calle Temecula is not constructed with the thicker structural section. Therefore, Staff requested Sunline to consider moving the Calle Temecula portion of its bus route to Calle Madrid between Eisenhower Drive and Avenida Obregon. Calle Madrid is also constructed with a thick structural section and is free of cross -gutters at every cross -street intersection. Sunline accepted the request in full cooperation, but did request a grace period to allow time for printing new bus schedules. Sunline will inaugurate service on the new route commencing on January 23, 1994. To accommodate Sunline, staff originally proposed to include the aforementioned segments of Calle Sinaloa, Avenida Obregon and Calle Madrid on the Truck System because the streets were constructed with a thicker structural section. However, when staff presented the Truck Route System to the Chamber of Commerce, Commercial Development Task Force, it was suggested that these street segments not be included on the Truck Route System because it would allow all trucks to use these residential streets in an unregulated manner. As a compromise, the Task Force suggested the City allow Sunline to operate its buses on these residential streets since they are constructed with a structural section that will carry the heavier truck loading. The existing code already provides exemptions to the Truck Route System, but does not currently provide opportunity to exempt Sunline. Therefore, staff recommends Code Section 12.56.030 (A) entitled Truck routes - Exemptions (Exhibit B, page 9) be amended to provide an additional exemption to accommodate Sunline. Another Truck Route issue that involves a Sunline bus route is: Avenida Bermudas (Calle Tampico - Calle Sinaloa). This segment of Bermudas is designated as a collector street in the General Plan. Staff is recommending most collector streets be included on the Truck Route System. However, this particular portion of Bermudas passes through the pedestrian oriented Village area. Therefore, staff does not recommend this portion of Bermudas be included on the Truck Route System, but staff does recommend Sunline be allowed to operate on this segment of Bermudas to serve and encourage pedestrian patronage in the Village. This proposed exemption is included in the attached ordinance. La Quinta Chamber of Commerce - City staff presented the proposed Truck Route System to the Chamber's Commercial Development Task Force. Other than the comments mentioned regarding restricted truck use on the residential streets where Sunline operates its bus route, the Task Force indicated its support for the Truck Route System. Riverside County Sheriff Department - The Sheriff's Department has reviewed the proposed ordinance and stated the modifications are easy to support. Moreover, the changes are reasonable and do not impede the movement of commercial vehicles. The ordinance will facilitate acceptance by the motoring public, and enforcement by patrol officers when needed. 000533 ANALYSIS/FISCAL IMPACT: It is proposed to amend Chapter 12.56 of the City's municipal code as follows: 1) Add Section 12.56.011 Truck Routes Designated. This section would add a table of the City's proposed truck routes, listing streets and portions of streets impacted, and require the City to post and maintain truck route signs. The addition of this section will activate existing Sections 12.56.010, 12.56.020 & 12.56.030 (Attachment B, pages 12 & 13 for existing code section). 2) Amend Section 12.56.030 (A) Truck Routes - Exemptions. The reason for amending this section is to provide an exemption to the Truck Route regulation for publicly operated transit vehicles (e.g. Sunline Transit District). 3) Delete Section 12.56.040 Commercial vehicles prohibited from using certain streets. The reason for deleting the section is: 1) it lacks a definition for commercial vehicles, and 2) it lacks authority to prevent access by non-commercial vehicles exceeding five tons (e.g. school buses). 4) Add a new Section 12.56.040 entitled Weight Restricted Streets Designated. This section allows the City to restrict any type of vehicle weighing more than five tons from traveling on designated roadway segments (emergency vehicles are exempt). It also requires the City to post and maintain signs. Staff expects to install approximately 110 signs ° at an estimated cost of $3,500 to implement the new Truck Route System. This estimate does not include labor which will be provided by the City crews. The Traffic Control Sign account has $5,000 budgeted, but is intended for maintenance and replacement of existing signage. Since this is an improvement expense, it is recommended that an additional $3,500 appropriation be made to this account from the General Fund's estimated available unreserved fund balance of $696,923. RECOMMENDATION: • Move to take up Ordinance by title and number only and waive further readings. • Move to introduce Ordinance on first reading and approve the Municipal Code Amendment regarding truck routes. • By Minute Motion 94 , move to direct staff to install the appropriate signs. • By Minute Motion 94 , move to appropriate $3,500 to the Traffic Control Sign account from the estimated unreserved fund balance for the General Fund. SDS/RV/ld Attachments: a) Existing Municipal Code Section b) Arterial Street System from General Plan c) Map of Restricted Streets d) Bus Route, Sunline Transit District e) Letter, Sheriff 4. These signs are posted at intersections where two truck route streets meet. A sign must be posted on each leg of the intersection to advise truckers approaching the intersection from any direction that the cross street is a truck route street. Additionally, some supplemental truck route signs may be needed at other non -truck route cross -street intersections if the cross street poses confusion as to whether it is or is not a truck route street. GUU534 r ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING TITLE 12.56 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE WHEREAS the California Vehicle Code authorizes cities to establish and regulate maximum gross weight limits on streets under its exclusive jurisdiction, and WHEREAS the City Council finds it appropriate to establish maximum gross weights on certain streets to prolong service life of the pavement and to enhance the quality of life in residential neighborhoods, and WHEREAS Title 12.56 of the Municipal Code does not currently designate certain streets for truck use nor does it establish specific gross weight limits for certain streets vulnerable to damage due to thin or aged pavement sections, NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of La Quinta, California does ordain as follows: SECTION 1. City of La Quinta Municipal Code Title 12.56 is hereby amended as follows: 1) Add Section 12.56.011 Truck Routes Designated, see attached Exhibit "A"; 2) Amend Section 12.56.030 (A) Truck Routes - Exemptions, see attached Exhibit "B"; 3) Delete Section 12.56.040 Commercial vehicles prohibited from using certain streets, see attached Exhibit "C"; 4) Add Section 12.56.040 entitled Weight Restricted Streets Designated, see attached Exhibit D. SECTION 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect thirty (30) days after its adoption. SECTION 3. POSTING. The City Clerk shall, within 15 days after passage of this ordinance, cause it to be posted in at least three public places designated by resolution of the City Council; shall certify to the adoption and posting of this ordinance; and, shall cause this ordinance and its certification, together with proof of posting, to be entered into the Book of Ordinances of this City. 000535- Ordinance No. 94 The foregoing Ordinance was approved and adopted at a meeting of the City Council held on the day of 1994, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JOHN PENA, Mayor City of La Quinta, California ATTEST: SAUNDRA L. JUHOLA, City Clerk City of La Quinta, California APPROVED AS TO FORM: DAWN HONEYWELL, City Attorney City of La Quinta, California 000536 EXHIBIT "A" 12.56.011 Truck Routes Designated. The following streets and portions of streets are designated and established as truck routes: Name of Street Portion Affected Adams Street In its entirety through the City Airport Boulevard In its entirety through the City Avenida Bermudas Avenue 52 south to Eisenhower Drive Avenue 48 In its entirety through the City Avenue 50 In its entirety through the City Avenue 52 Avenida Bermudas east to City Limits Avenue 54 In its entirety through the City Avenue 58 In its entirety through the City Avenue 60 In its entirety through the City Calle Sinaloa Eisenhower Drive east to Avenida Bermudas Calle Tampico Eisenhower Drive east to Washington Street Dune Palms Road Miles Avenue south to Avenue 48 Eisenhower Drive In its entirety through the City Fred Waring Drive In its entirety through the City Jefferson Street In its entirety through the City Madison Street In its entirety through the City Miles Avenue In its entirety through the City Monroe Street In its entirety through the City Washington Street In its entirety through the City Westward Ho Drive Dune Palms Road east to Adams Street The City Traffic Engineer shall erect and maintain appropriate signs on those streets affected by this ordinance. Such signs shall be erected at all intersections of truck routes, and at all intersections of designated routes within the boundary lines of the city, or the terminus of the route. 000537 EXHIBIT "B" 12.56.030 Truck routes - Exemptions. The provisions of Sections 12.56.010 and 12.56.020 shall not apply to: A. Passenger buses under the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission or, publicl funded and operated transit vehicles; or B. Any vehicle owned by a public utility while necessarily in use in the construction, installation or repair of any public utility; or C. Any vehicle delivering street construction materials for street construction or repairs. (Ord. 10 § 1 (part) 1982) 000538 EXHIBIT "C" :. :. :. 000539 EXHIBIT "D" 12.56.040 Weight Restricted Streets Designated. The following streets and portions of streets are designated as streets where use is prohibited to any vehicle in excess of five tons gross vehicle weight: Name of Street Portions Affected Dune Palms Road Miles Avenue north to Star Flower Trail Westward Ho Drive Dune Palms Road east to Jefferson Street The City Traffic Engineer shall erect and maintain appropriate signs on those streets affected by this ordinance. Such signs shall be erected at the ingress point of the restricted street, and at all intersections of designated truck routes, or the boundary lines of the city, or the terminus of the restricted street. The City will allow overweight trucks to pass over restricted streets only when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries as provided in Section 12.56.020, except however, emergency response vehicles while responding to an emergency are exempt from this code requirement. 000540 4 4 ATTACHMENT A 1256.010 Chapter 1236 RESTRICTED USE OF CERTAIN STREETS Sections: — IM6.010 Truck routes —Establishment. 12.S6.020 Truck routes —Use required —Exceptions. 12S6.030 Truck routes —Exemptions. 12S6.040 Commercial vehicles prohibited from using certain streets. 12S6.OSO Railway gates. 12.56.060 Trains not to block crossings. 12S6.010 Truckroutes—Establishment. Whenever any ordinance of this cite designate,. and describes any street or portion thereof as a street to use of which is permitted by any vehicle. exceeding a maxi num gross weight limit o are tons, the city traffic engineer is authorized to designate such street or streets by appropriate signs as "TRUCK TRAMC ROUTES" for the movement of vehicles exceeding a maximum gross weight limit of three tons. (Ord. 10 § 1 (part),1982) 1256.020 Truck routes —Use required —Exceptions. When any such truck traffic route or routes are established and designated by appropriate signs, the operator of any vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight limit of three tons shall drive on such route or routes and none other, except that nothing in this section shall prohibit the operator of any vehicle exceeding a maximum gross weight of three tons coming from a "TRUCK TRAFFIC ROUTE" having ingress and egress by direct route to and from restricted streets when necessary for the purpose of making pickups or deliveries of goods, wares or merchandise from or to any building or structure located on such restricted streets or for the purpose of delivering materials to be used in the actual and bona fide repair. alteration, remodeling or construction of any building or structure upon such restricted streets for which a building permit has previously been obtained therefor. (Ord. 10 § I (part),1982) 12S6.030 Truck routes —Exemptions. The provisions of Sections 1256.010 and 1256.020 shall not apply to: A. Passenger buses under the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission; or B. Any vehicle owned by a public utility while necessarily in use in the construction, installation or repair of any public utility; or C.. Any vehicle delivering street construction materials for street construction or repairs. (Ord. 10 § 1 (part),1982) t256.040 Commercial vehicles prohibited from using certain strteu. Whenever any ordinance of this city designates and describes any street or portion thereof as a street the use of which is prohibited by any commercial vehicle, the city traffic engineer shall erect and maintain appropriate signs on those streets affected by such ordinance. (Ord. 10 § I (part),1982) 1256.050 Railway gates. No person shall drive any vehicle through, around or under any crossing gate or barrier at a railroad grade crossing while such gate or barrier is closed or is being opened or closed. (Ord. 10 § 1(part), 1982) 1256.060 Trains not to block crossings. It is unlawful for any person to cause or permit any railway train or railway cars or similar vehicle on rails to operate or to be operated in such a manner as to prevent the use of any street for the purposes of travel for a period of time longer than ten minutes, except that this provision shall not apply to railway trains, cars or similar vehicles on rails while blocking or obstructing a crossing because of an accident nrif1SQ1 19 12s6.060 which requires the operator of the train, car or similar vehicle on rails to stop at or near the scene of the accident. (Ord. 10 11 (part), 1982) 00054? 13 ATTACHMENT B A1� My V OEM qOTHE DESERT CIRCUATION SYSM POLICY DIAGRAM MAM ARTINU Q Pis"" MrTEwa 8 WCOND m AwnuAL 8 ®= Anra.,m n �� n�art-0s-war 11[ou=CAL7/wi �� iiiiii��: ~ ATTACHMENT D � PQcoCD0mnmWorNra�:rnadn r . Q oQr at y amnm Or/VrN64to !0�?n!q!q�atrn nr� 0 W)P! mao00'prNM�tOm N N� N N N N N N N N N N N y m in inhgpO�N.-Nl7 v►Nm 4<1 UvrUmsuw mil - - -a is tC0•g0Vq — !! y NNff!f 1pmn�0 � !►, Nl �t( 7c4cj c,5FcF-- cm 0 v hm y_h to V) I�Nt`ISYc. cjc 4YSY 0)ithmn � nnnnnnnn nnnnn s m^�QOrNr r r r l7Y NfOh a p a� 1�� P g N O b 00054.) ATTACHMENT E I, RIVERSIDE COUNTY COLS BYRD, SHERIFF Sheriff 82-695 DR. CARREON BLVD. • INDIO, CA 92201 • (619) 342-8990 (819) PROUDLY SERVING AS THE LA QOINTA POLICE DEPARTMMM September 28, 1993 Mr. Steve Speer Assistant City Enginee City of La Quinta 78-495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, C lifornia 92253 Dear Mr peer, I have reviewed the proposed revisions to the municipal code which will designate truck routes and weight restrict streets. It is easy to support the modifications. The changes are reasonable and do not unnecessarily impede the movement of commercial vehicles. This will facilitate acceptance by the motoring public and enforcement by patrol officers when needed. If I can be of further assistance in this matter, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, RONYE Captain Station Commander 00054;; 17