MUP 2004-483�La Quinta
lity Development Department
,alle Tampico
ta, California 92253
7-7125 FAX: (760) 777-1233
nw4mm cam. i
OFFICE USE ONLY
Case No. /4 UP �� `�'`�'63
Date Recvd.
Feer
Related Apps.:
Logged in by:
DN FOR MINOR USE PERMIT APPROVAL
A
MINOR USE PERMIT applications are reviewed and approved by the Community Development Director
pursuant to Section 9.210.020, of the Zoning Code. The purpose of the review is to ensure that land uses requiring
the permit do not have an adverse impact on surrounding properties, residents, or businesses.
APPLICANT
(Print)
MAILING ADDRESS_ _�7f Phone No< Gl
CITY, STATE, ZIP: Fax No__33
PROPERTY OWNER (If different):,, J /
H
(Print)
MAILING ADDRESS:
CITY, STATE, ZIP:
PROJECT LOCATION:_3",,�--
Phone No.
Fax No.
s
PROPOSED USE AND/OR CONSTRUCTION (Including operational information):
(attach sheets if needed)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION (LOT & TRACT OR A.P.N.): 7,!�; / -xg 1 - eo�%d.6 —/
A 18\Minor Use Permit
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:
O Plot Plan, floor plans and elevation plans as determined by Community Development Department staff .
Five (5) sets of plans on 8'/z" x 11" sheet or folded down to 8'/z" x 11".
Filing fee for Minor Use Permit. If filing multiple applications, the most expensive application will be
charged full fee; with remaining related applications discounted 50% for each. This discount doe's -hot apply
to Environmental Information form.
NAME OF APPLICANT
(Please Print)
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT DATE_�a��
NAME OF PROPERTY OWN—
�����i%�s� (Please Print)
SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER(S)
IF NOT SAME AS APPLICANT: DATE
(Signature provides consent for applicant to use site for proposed activity).
DATE
(Separate written authority by owner to submit application may be provided)
NOTE: FALSE OR MISLEADING INFORMATION GIVEN IN THIS APPLICATION SHALL BE
GROUNDS FOR DENYING APPLICATION.
A18\Minor Use Permit
June 9, 2004
CC44 4 4 4dec-
P.O. Box 1504
78-4,95 CALLE TAMPICO
LA QUINTA, CALIFORNIA 92253
(760) 777-7000
FAX (760) 777-7101
Mr. Jack Duke FILE COPY
58007 Monroe Street
La Quinta, CA 92253
SUBJECT: Planning Commission Action; Minor Use Permit 2004-483
Dear Mr. Duke:
This is to formally notify you that on June 8, 2004, the La Quinta Planning Commission
did, by a 5-0 decision, adopt Minute Motion 2004-011, granting approval of the subject
item. This action was taken subject to the staff recommended approval conditions, with
modifications by the Planning Commission to Condition 5. A copy of the final conditions is
attached (changes highlighted in bold type).
This decision may be appealed to the City Council, provided the written appeal and filing
fee of $175.00 are submitted to this Department within 15 calendar days. Therefore, this
approval shall not become effective until 15 calendar days from the date of the Planning
Commission action (June 23, 2004).
Should you have any questions regarding this information, please do not hesitate to
contact me at 777-7069.
Very truly yours,
JERRY HERMAN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Wallace Nesbit
Associate Planner
WN/wn
c: Building and Safety Department
Code Compliance
PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTE MOTION 2004-011
MINOR USE PERMIT 2004-483 - JACK DUKE
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL - FINAL
JUNE 8, 2004
Planning Commission revisions in bold font
1. The applicant/developer agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the
City of LaQuinta from any' legal claim or litigation arising out of the City's
approval of this project. The City of La Quinta shall have the right to select
its defense counsel at its sole discretion.
2. - This approval is for location of a mobile home only; it does not allow
establishment of . any fencing, equipment storage/staging areas, additional
trailers, etc.
3. All existing trailers on the site shall be removed prior to any occupancy of
the mobile home.
4. No occupancy of the mobile home shall be permitted until the appropriate
building permit is issued. The applicant shall obtain all required building
permits, including an electrical permit for temporary power.
5. Approval of 'Minor Use Permit 2004-483 shall be effective until June 8,
2005. Subject to Planning Commission review, this approval may -be
extended up to one additional .year, provided the applicant has obtained a
building permit to complete the single-family residence, with physical
construction having beencommenced commenced and continuous. If no building permit
has been obtained by June 8, 2005, a six-month extension may be approved
by the Planning Commission, with the requirement that a two -car garagej.
along with typical required landscaping and other related improvements, be
constructed within the extension period. If the conditions of either extension
are not fulfilled within the allotted time period, the use shall . cease and all
rights granted herein shall become null and void. The applicant shall then
remove all improvements granted herein.
DATE:
CASE NO:
APPLICANT/OWNER:
REQUEST:
LOCATION:
ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSIDERATION:
GENERAL PLAN
DESIGNATION:
ZONING:
BACKGROUND:
0
STAFF REPORT
PLANNING COMMISSION
JUNE 8, 2004
MINOR USE PERMIT 2004-483
JACK DUKE
FILE COPY
CONSIDERATION OF THE PLACEMENT OF A MOBILE
HOME ON A RESIDENTIALLY -ZONED PROPERTY
58-007 MONROE STREET (ATTACHMENT 1)
DETERMINED TO BE CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT UNDER
CEQA GUIDELINES SECTION 15303
RL (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)
RL (LOW DENSITY RESIDENTIAL)
Site History
The 4.35 -site is physically located at the southwest corner of Avenue 58 and
Monroe Street. The property is generally vacant but has been in agriculture in the
past. Currently, there are four trailer structures on the property, along with an
incomplete single-family dwelling (foundation only). These trailers and initial framing
of the single-family dwelling were established under County jurisdiction with no
permits. City Code Compliance took over jurisdiction of this non -approved
construction when the area was annexed in August 2002. The initial framing was
removed and the concrete slab/foundation was allowed to remain, as it does not
require a permit. At present, the applicant has withdrawn his plan check for the
house and has no plans in for review.
PROPOSAL:
The applicant requests a permit to retain and complete the installation of an
approximate 1,440 s.f. double -wide mobile home on the 4.35 acre property
(Attachment 2). Currently the mobile home is set on a masonry foundation and
requires a power connection (Attachment 3). As the home was set without a
permit, Building and Safety will not issue temporary power until the installation is
approved. The applicant intends to reside in the new mobile home until the single-
family home is completed. An existing trailer used for residential purposes, will be
removed and replaced by this mobile home. The applicant would leave the
construction trailer in place for use in connection with completing the single-family
dwelling.
• - •
ANALYSIS:
1. Section 9.60.180 requires Planning Commission review and approval of any
application to place a mobile or manufactured home on any individual parcel
of land, through the Minor Use Permit process. The unit must meet the
development standards of the underlying zoning district.
2.. Based on the development standards of the RL district, the proposed mobile
home can be placed in accordance with provisions of the RL zone, provided
all 'other trailers are removed. The applicant may 'apply to replace the
construction trailer, under an . MUP, only after he has obtained a building
permit for the single-family residence.
3.. To complywith the RL standards a two -car garage must be provided. There is
no garage on the property at this time. As this is intended to be a temporary
use of the trailer rather than a permanent home, staff has recommended that -
the mobile be permitted to be placed for a 12 -month period, at which time
the situation can be .reviewed. A garage will be required if no final building
permit for the permanent single-family home has been built by that time.
FINDINGS:
Findings as required. under Section 9.60.180 of the La Quinta Municipal Code, Title
9, can be made as set forth below in support of MUP 2004-483:
A. Minor Use Permit 2004-483, as recommended, is consistent with the La
Quinta General Plan, -as it will be developed in a manner consistent with the
General Plan Land Use designation of Low Density Residential and other
current City standards.
B. Minor Use Permit 2004-483, as recommended, is consistent with the La
Quinta Zoning Code, . as the project contemplates land uses that are
substantially equivalent to . those permitted under existing Low Density
Residential zoning, and which were previously addressed in the EIR certified
for the La Quinta General Plan.
C. Minor Use Permit .2004-483, as recommended, complies with the
requirements of "The Rules to Implement the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970" (CEQA) as amended (City, Council Resolution .83-63), as it has
been determined that said Minor Use Permit is Categorically Exempt from
environmental review under CEQA Guidelines Section 15303.
D. Minor Use Permit 2004-483, as recommended, is architecturally compatible
with and visually related to surrounding development. Adjacent surrounding
properties are larger parcels with similar temporary trailer structures or older
single-family homes, and approval of this use will not be inconsistent with
existing conditions in the area.
0 2�
E. Minor Use Permit 2004-483, . as recommended, is harmonious with and
visually related to' surrounding development, as it . will not adversely affect
surrounding land uses or be out of character with the surrounding area. -
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt Minute Motion 2004 - approving .Minor Use Permit 2004-483, subject
to the following conditions:
1. The applicant/developer agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the
City of -La Quinta from any legal claim or litigation arising out of the City's
approval of this project. The City of La Quinta shall have the right to select
its defense counsel at its sole discretion.
2. This. approval is for location of a mobile home only; it does not allow
.establishment of any. fencing, equipment storage/staging areas, additional
trailers, etc.
3. All existing trailers on the site shall be removed. prior to any occupancy 'of
the mobile home.
4. No occupancy of the mobile home shall be permitted until the appropriate
building permit .is issued. The applicant shall obtain all required building
permits, including an electrical permit for temporary power.
5. Approval of Minor Use Permit 2004-483 shall be effective - u.ntil June 8,
2005. This approval may be extended up to one additional year, provided the
applicant has obtained a .building permit to complete the single-family
residence, . with physical construction having been commenced and
continuous. If no building permit, has been obtained by June 8, 2005, a six-
month extension may be approved, with the requirement that a two -car
garage, along with typical required landscaping and other related
improvements, be constructed within the extension period. If the conditions
of either extension are not fulfilled within the allotted time period, the use
shall cease and all rights granted herein shall become null and void. The
applicant shall then remove .all improvements- granted herein.
03
Wallace Nesbit, Associate Planner
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Site Improvements
3. Photos of mobile home
4. Code Compliance report
I
0
O
O
OrTACHMENT 1
Z
m
i�0 N
In
1 v
• rn
1.
1
' a
0
c„
m
o
Co
Ln'
O
V
O�
m
ORAE 27 T.6S.,R.7E
A VE
on.:ae4.ea '
774 1B4
O 1 O
T.R.A. 058-085 ��- U
761-18
5
I' 100'
ANGLE = 0
1fFsroe.,+n1*L )eV -rty)PE
/bc7.3i c. if MAI t4./$
3 . axil srnNG-
I SrNbc.� �.A"'►/c.`y QlNEttr.�J(,_
0
ZZ l �W Si3 O^' S •
I .5. 0 e OcrL%�2loeq,"7dG
✓% LrENr>� y D; l l V E
Cc
D
n
m
z
N
l4aF
Liz- iT . ...... .
_tme
. 1��7 `�15� 7yr y��t°• 1 r \ � L��� fi ♦ I r
fr r \ �1 f�l•..if`i tq+�1 1 �a /ff�a/, Qt
— `
I �I
ird
ate.•-.• -�,._ :;,;,�,•'-�M.� ,,,,w=---~-�.�•_-�� `'`"�� - - _,�;�- •-
-_,ger ''.+»cen-+'�""� r:: f(bk • ,�yg�emsr'M .. - .enc'?
';�. � 3 ', r j"�.�e-�.� tmh� 'i". t' d s ,� i�L' 4 � X� y y-=N°ri� ^ � F�F�i� t �;�J ) rp,� 3.:�. •� .
PZ"
WK
M�.,�.,a�+v„�, I."i:,S I r"s+'E .S 1,,. e�” P,.�,, �p""r�.7.rt %�r� A �tv', 7/�r +,/'• r
�•,� 1 ) �r;. +. yxv$ .r Vdi / y r IjAi.•s.� .Y N [��diJ ''i`T • .� �cr. ! - ./ ) o 'Ziv .�n f1 i < i
�-.��yq� � L � V���` J+x I �� a �.,i�iP� � +k,�, tq i .fir r "} tt 'F•n� �\����'t''��r's
�;��[. . � @ �� �• ✓o � � cc r -f �? s �":5��'+r� �, } r �+t ��.�••� t�j�.;�.� ,;m �i 'Sfi. C� �e1. 1 ;
,{ ti ��i" i��S�yy�r v � c;+'*�Sj��TJ�,�a_ryg'„.R'.'v �"r .v'� 7�I�,q,r .yt \''�dfi<$,�'7 �)`_.�`�py,�yr tb•����q �I�� r.rl \� a
i�.��t-tt��t�ri � ��,v� <rt R "y' /i�,_ �c�1.�'�*`sr.e.'�,�• $r l>Y�{tit •� 't�Fev '�� �� �r
i•^�t +srri' p
� *.ATTACHMENT 4
PH: (760)777-7000 .
City of La Quinta FAX: (760)777-7011
78-495 Calle Tampico - La Quinta, California 92253 TDD: (760)777-1227
Case# 7167
Date Reported
eceived By
How Received
lComplaint
10/1/2002
Anthony Moreno
Phone
Founded
Location
The'Southwest Corner Of Monroe Street And Avenue 58
N
ddress
764-180-006
58007 Monroe street
eporting Party Name
hone
epordng Party Address
ED DELGADO
863-7864
RCCE NA
Description
Construction Of A Dwelling Was Reported As In Progress At The Location Above Without The Benefit Of A Permit. There Is Also A Construction And/or
Guard Office And A Mobilehome. Both Are On Stands Without Skirting And No Permits.
Codes Violated
Code#
Description
8.01.060
It shall be unlawful for'any person, firm or corporation to erect, construct, enlarge, alter, repair, move, improve, remove, convert, or
demolish any building or structure, including a swimming pool, spa or hot tub, or make any installation, alteration, repair,
replacement, or remodel any building service equipment, including pool, spa and hot tub equipment, or cause the same to be done
without first obtaining a separate, appropriate permit.
9.60.210
CONSTRUCTION AND GUARD OFFICES: THE TEMPORARY PLACEMENT OF A TRAILER, RECREATIONAL VEHICLE OR
OTHER RELOCATABLE BUILDING, OR THE TEMPORARY USE OF A PERMANENT STRUCTURE ON AN ACTIVE
CONSTRUCTION OR GRADING SITE TO SERVE AS A CONSTRUCTION AND/OR GUARD OFFICE, AND THE
ESTABLISHMENT OF A MATERIALS AND EQUIPEMENT STORAGE YARD, MAY BE PERMITTED SUBJECT TO
APPROVAL OF A MINOR USE"PERMIT PROCESSED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9._210.020 AND OTHER
FOLLOWING. REQUIREMENTS.
9.60.180 E
Manufactured housing and Mobilehomes. Aproval of a Minor Use Permit by the Planning Commission shall be required prior to
placement. The permit shall not be approved unless the Community Development Director finds that the dwelling meets the same
Development Standards, (see complete code).
Officer Assigned
Anthony Moreno
Thursday, June 03, 2004
Date Closed
Monday, October 06, 2003
Approved By
Deby Conrad
Page I of 17
09
Case# 7167
Events
........y -..r
I, OFFICER MORENO, AND SENIOR OFFICER DEBY CONRAD MADE CONTACT WITH MR. JACK DUKE,(OF JACK DUKE BAIL BONDS PHONE
# 347-1845 8 FAX # 347-1533) AT 58007 MONROE STREET. HE INITIALLY IDENTIFIED HIMSELF AS THE OWNER. HE LATER MENTIONED.
THAT HIS MOTHER-IN-LAW, DOMINGA DIAZ, WAS THE RECORDED OWNER. WE REQUESTED HIS CONSENT TO INSPECT THE
STRUCTURE AND TO TAKE PICTURES. HE VOLUNTARILY SIGNED A CONSENT FORM TO INSPECT. I REQUESTED TO SEE HIS JOB CARC
AND PERMIT. HE STATED HE DID NOT HAVE EITHER, I SHOWED HIM A MAP THAT IDENTIFIED THE PROPERTY WAS IN LA QUINTA-S
CITY LIMITS. I INFORMED HIM THAT WE WOULD BE ISSUING A WARNING NOTICE THAT WOULD REQUIRE THEM TO CEASE/STOP ALL
CONSTRUCTION. I DID EXPLAIN THAT IT WAS A MISDEMEANOR. VIOLATION TO CONSTRUCT WITHOUT A PERMIT. ANY FUTURE
CONSTRUCTION WOULD SUBJECT ALL WORKERS AND OWNERS TO A MISDEMEANOR CITATION. HE UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED TO
STOP.' THE NEW SLAB WAS POURED OVER A EXISTING SLAB. - HE DID MENTION THAT HE TOOK PICTURES OF THE CONSTRUCTION. I
INFORMED HIM VERBALLY AND IN WRITING THAT HE WOULD NEED TO SUBMIT PLANS THROUGH THE APPROVAL PROCESS AND
OBTAIN A PERMIT AND OBTAIN INSPECTIONS TO INSURE THEY MEET MINIMUM BUILDING STANDARDS. I DID MENTION TO HIM THAT I
WOULD BE SENDING HIM A FAX OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OFFICE AND THE MOBILE HOME.
10/2/2002 Wednesday Follow-up
THE CASE WAS REVIEWED IN OUR MORNING STAFF MEETING. SENIOR OFFICER, DEBY CONRAD, INDICATED THE POSTING OF AN
OFFICIAL RED TAG NOTICE/STOP WORK ORDER SHOULD BE POSTED. I HAVE THE NOTICE PREPARED FOR POSTING. SHE ALSO
STATED SHE REVIEWED THE NOTICE OF VIOLATION THAT I PREPARED YESTERDAY FOR CERTIFIED MAILING AND LEGAL POSTING.
SHE LIKED THE CONTENT OF THE LETTER, BUT INDICATED THAT I SHOULD CHANGE IT TO A NOTICE OF PUBLIC NUISANCE DUE TO
THE SERIOUSNESS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. I WILL MAKE THE REDLINE CHANGES. I WILL PREPARE THE BOTH THE RED
TAG/ STOP WORK ORDER AND THE NOTICE OF PUBLIC NUISANCE SO I CAN POST BOTH TODAY. MR. TOM HARTUNG, THE BUILDING
OFFICIAL IS AWARE OF THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. HE E-MAILED ME ON 10/2/02 THAT HE SPOKE WITH JACK DUKE
REGARDING THE UNPERMITTED PROJECT. TOM CONFIRMED THAT MR. DUKE UNDERSTOOD THAT NO WORK WAS'TO BE DONE ON
THE STRUCTURE. MR. DUKE INDICATED TO MR. HARTUNG THAT HE INTENDED TO HAVE PLANS SUBMITTED NEXT WEEK.
10/312002 Wednesday - Follow-up
THE NOTICE OF PUBLIC NUISANCE LETTER WAS PREPARED FOR CERTIFIED MAILING, FIRST CLASS MAIL, AND LEGAL POSTING. THE
RED TAG/STOP WORK ORDERS ARE PREPARED FOR
POSTING.
THE JOBSITE WAS RED TAGGED TO CEASE ALL CONSTRUCTION AND WAS PHOTOGRAPHED. MR. DUKE WAS
INFORMED THE RED TAG NOTICES WERE REQUIRED TO REMAIN POSTED. THE NOTICE OF PUBLIC NUISANCE WAS POSTED AND
PHOTOGRAPHED WITH SENIOR CODE OFFICER DEBY CONRAD PRESENT AND MR. JACK DUKE PRESENT. THE NOTICE OF PUBLIC
NUISANCE WAS THEN HAND SERVED TO MR. DUKE. THE CERTIFIED MAILING WAS SENT TO THE RECORDED OWNER MRS. DOMINGA
DIAZ.
10812002 Monday Follow-up
THE GREEN CARD FOR CONFIRMATION OF THE RECEIPT OF THE CERTIFIED MAILING WAS RECEIVED DATED 10/7/02 AND SIGNED BY
ELIDA DUKE. (MR. JACK DUKE IDENTIFIED HIMSELF AS THE SON-IN-LAW OF THE OWNER. MRS. ELIDA DUKE IS POSSIBLY THE MOTHER
OF THE RECORDED OWNER, MRS. DOMINGA DIAZ).
10/1112002 Friday Follow-up
THE INFORMATION REGARDING THE OWNERSHIP INFORMATION OF THE ROAD/PARCEL SOUTH OF DOMINGA DIAZIS PROPERTY IS
BEING SENT AT THE REQUEST OF MR. DUKE. THIS INFORMATION IS PUBLIC INFORMATION AND IS BEING SENT VIA FAX.
4/23/2003 Wednesday Follow-up
I INQUIRED WITH ED RANDALL ABOUT THE STATUS OF THE CASE, IF MR. DUKE HAS SUBMITTED PLANS AND RECEIVED A PERMIT.
PLANS WERE SUBMITTED ON 11/7/2002. The plans were picked up for correction on 2/13/03. Ed spoke to the architect,. Michael Hurst, las week and
he anticipated a resubmittal in the next week to ten days.
Officer Assigned Date Closed Approved By
Anthony Moreno Monday, October 06, 2003 Deby Conrad
Thursday, June 03, 2004
Page 2 of 17
10
Case# 7167
6/20/2003 Tuesday Follow-up
I CHECKED WITH BUILDING .& SAFETY. THEY STATED THE ARCHITECT, MICHAEL HURST HAS NOT RESUBMITTED PLANS. I WAS
CALLED THIRTY MINUTES LATER THAT THE ARCHITECT CAME IN AND RESUBMITTED SHORTLY AFTER MY CALL AND INQUIRY. I WILL
CHECK WITH BUILDING AND SAFETY IN 3 WEEKS TO SEE_IF THE PLANS WERE APPROVED. ONCE PLANS ARE APPROVED, I WILL CLOSE
THE CASE AND THEY WILL BE UNDER THE OVERSIGHT AND INSPECTIONS OF BUILDING & SAFETY..
8/1/2003 Friday Follow-up
I spoke to Building Inspector Danny Crawford: He pulled the file and it appears on 5/20/03 the owner resubmitted and the plan check was sent back to
them on 6/6/03. On 5/22/03 they applied to extend the permit and it was extended to 11/3/03. There have been approximately two months that have passed
and there has been no plan resubmittal. The case was initiated on 10/11/02 and we still do not have a permit ten months later. I called the Architect Mr.
Hurst and left a message requesting a call back with their Intent. I advised him that with a.building in a state of partial construction, if the permit expires on
11 /3/03 and we have not issued a permit, we could possibly end up pursuing a demolition of the illegal structure. I requested he call and advise of their
intent. I advised I was leaving on 8/4/03 and would be back 8/11/03 and to leave a message and I would call him back. .
9116/2003 Tuesday Follow-up
I called Jack Duke and left a message for a call back. I wil send a Final Notice of Violation to correct the violations within 2 weeks. I went to the location
and posted a Final Notice of Violation and hand served a copy to him. He stated his architect has stated there was an extension. An extension was given
by B & S til November 3, 2003 to obtain a permit. However, there are other issues. They.need to obtain a Minor Use Permit for the Construction
guardshack and the mobile home.
9/17/2003 Wednesday - Follow-up
Jack Duke called. We agreed he has an extension'to obtain a permit by 11/3/03. We discussed the other issues of the construction trailer and the mobile
home requiring a Minor Use Permit. He stated he attended a council meeting and the previous mayor Pena stated that these issues were grandfathered. I
checked and obtained the Council Meeting minutes for October 1, 2002 pages 9 $10. Mr. Duke questioned why he was not notified his property was
annexed into La Quinta. This issue is really irrelevant due to the fact if the land was still in county, they.would have required permits for the construction of
the dwelling, the temporary construction shack and the mobilehome. Since he did not have permits to make these items legal in the first place they cannot
be grandfathered. The statement made by'Council Member Henderson pointed,out Mr. Duke will still be allowed the agriculture use because it was
grandfathered in." This statement limited the grandfather to agricultural uses only and has no bearing on the other issues. I called Mr. Duke back and he
will call me.
10/6/2003 Monday Case Closed
Building Inspector Danny Crawford forwarded a letter to Jack Duke confirming their telephone conversation on 102/03. 1 received a copy of the -letter. Mr.
Duke has verbally withdrawn his Plan Review Application for the proposed single family dwelling at 58007 Monroe Street. He stated he has removed the
illegal partially constructed dwelling. He intends to retain the slab since fiatwork does not require a permit. He claimed the temporary construction trailer
and the mobilehome are grandfathered and he intends to retain those on the property. Both the trailer and the mobilehome, under county requirements
before our annexation, required permits to be on the physical property and there is no such permit on file. Our codes require a Minor Use Permit. I was
advised by John Hardcastle that the life safety issue has been resolved and to close the case.
Officer Assigned
Anthony Moreno
Thursday, June 03, 2004
Date Closed
Monday, October 06, 2003
Approved By
Deby Conrad
Page 3 of 17
11.
Case# 7167
Pictures:
Pictures
Officer Assigned
Anthony Moreno
Thursday, June 03, 2004
Photos taken 9/16103.
Date Closed Approved By
Monday, October 06, 2003 Deby Conrad
Page 11 of 17
12
Case# 7167
Officer Assigned
Anthony Moreno .
Thursday, June 03, 2004
Date Closed
Monday, October 06, 2003
Approved By
Deby Conrad
Page 12 of 17
13
Case# 7167
Officer Assigned
Anthony Moreno
Thursday, June 03, 2004
Date Closed
Monday, October 06, 2003
Approved By
Deby Conrad
Page 14 of 17
15
Case# 7167
Officer Assigned
Anthony Moreno
Thursday, June 03, 2004
Photos taken 10/6/03. Structure removed.
Date Closed Approved By
Monday, October 06, 2003 Deby Conrad
Page IS of 17
16
Case# 7167
Officer Assigned
Anthony Moreno
Thursday, June 03, 2004
Construction trailer remains.
Date Closed Approved By
Monday, October 06, 2003 Deby Conrad
Page 17 of] 7
18
f-u
OR . NE 27 T . 6S . , R .7.E T.R.A. 0587085 q' 7
761-18
01
22 23
w VE
OA. 24!40'!
� 2B
724 162 1p
ANGLE = 0
i
2. �NSr7'LvuT)a..J !.-Z4-+L%
3O
m
y i S C?C2�o.�i».�G
�12if�c�2
s D
D
n
rn
z
� N
� 19 .
Planning Commission Minutes
June 8, 2004
7. Commissioner Tyler stated he finds it unfortunate the City does
not have a procedure for the naming of streets. He would
recommend the staff come up with a procedure. .
8. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners DanielsAbels to
adopt Planning Commission Resolution 2004-036, approving a
Resolution of Intent to consider Street Name Change 2004-017,
as recommended.
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and Chairman
Kirk. NOES: None. ABSENT: None. ABSTAIN: None.
C. Minor Use Permit 2004-483; a request of Jack Duke for consideration of
placement of a mobile home on residentially zoned property located at
58-007 Monroe Street.
1. Chairman Kirk asked for the staff report. Associate Planner
Wallace Nesbit presented the information contained in the report a
copy of which is on file in the Community Development
Department.
2. Chairman Kirk asked if there were any questions of staff.
Commissioner Daniels asked if this approval would resolve the
Code enforcement problems. Staff stated yes.
3. Commissioner Tyler stated he did not agree with Finding "D" and
did not believe it was appropriate. Staff stated this finding was
originally made to regulate mobile homes in the Cove. In this
instance there are mobile homes in the area of this proposed
mobile home and therefore, in staff's opinion, it was an
appropriate finding to include. Commissioner Tyler asked if the
foundation for the mobile home was up to Code. Staff stated that
is unknown at this time as there have not been any inspections.
Planning Manager Oscar Orci stated approval of this application
would allow the City to inspect the footings. Commissioner Tyler
stated that if this applicatiorr is granted, he would request it apply
only to the current owner, as the property is currently listed for
sale. Staff stated the approval would have to run with the
property. Assistant City Attorney Michael Houston clarified the
approval would run with the property.
4. Commissioner Quill asked the purpose of the other trailers. Staff
G:\WPDOCS\PC Minutes\6-22-04.doc
10
Planning Commission Minutes
June 8, 2004
stated it is thought that other family members live there.
5. There -being no further questions of staff, Chairman Kirk asked if
the applicant would like to address the ,Commission. Mr. Jack
Duke, 58-007 Monroe Street, .explained the purpose of the
request.
6. There being ' no. questions of the applicant and no other public
comment, Chairman Kirk closed the public'participation portion of
the hearing.
7. It was moved and seconded by Commissioners Daniels/Quill to.
adopt Minute Motion 2004-012, approving. Minor Use Permit
2004-483, as amended:
a. Condition #5 amended: Any extension of time .shall be.
approved by the. Planning Commission. .
ROLL CALL: AYES: Commissioners Abels, Daniels, Quill, Tyler, and
Chairman Kirk. NOES: None.. ABSENT: -None.
ABSTAIN: None.
VII. CORRESPONDENCE AND WRITTEN MATERIAL: None.
VIII.. COMMISSIONER ITEMS:
A.. A report was given on the City Council of June 1, 2004.
IX. ADJOURNMENT:
There being . no further business, it was moved and seconded by Commissioners
Abelsl/Daniels to adjourn this regular meeting of the Planning Commission to a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission to beheld on June 22, 2004, at 7:00 p.m. This
meeting of the Planning -Commission was adjourned 8:30' p.m., on June 8, 2004.
Respectfully submitted,.
Be J yer, xecutive Secretary
City of La Quinta, California
GAWPDOMPC Minutes\6-22-04.doc I I
Anthonv Moreno
From: Anthony Moreno
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 8:28 AM
To: Wally Nesbit
Subject: RE: Jack Duke property at 58007 Monroe Street
This is a summary of the case at 58007 Monroe Street that includes my involvement:
1) 10/1/02- Riverside County Code Compliance Officer Ed Delgado reported construction of a dwelling without plans,
permit or inspection. There is also a construction trailer and a mobilehome onsite without a Minor Use Permit.
2) 10/3/02- A Notice of Public Nuisance was sent regular and certified mail and was posted at the property. The property
was red tagged to cease all construction, to obtain necessary permits or to remove the structure, mobilehome and
construction trailer.
3) 10/6/03- The unpermitted dwelling was removed. The construction trailer and mobilehome were still present onsite and
at the direction of former Community Safety Manager, John Hardcastle the case was closed. See final entry to Case 7167
on 10/6/03.
I have had no contact regarding any proposals from Jack Duke but have heard there was something being proposed
possibly to Building & Safety or Community Development.
Anthony Moreno
-----Original Message -----
From: Wally Nesbit
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2004 9:41 AM
To: Anthony Moreno; Ed Randall
Subject: Jack Duke property at 58007 Monroe Street
I need the background on this case (if there is one) for a report I am working on to Planning Commission. Just a brief
summary of the issue, what he is trying to do and what the status is on the property. We are processing a MUP for him
to site a double -wide as a residence until his home is completed, and I need to know what conditions may be
necessary. PIs respond today if possible.
WALLACE H. NESBIT
ASSOCIATE. PLANNER
CITY OF LA QUINTA
PH: 760.777.7069
FAX: 760.777.1 233
E-MAIL: WNES13IT@LA-QUINTA.0RG
W.H. Negrit
via
aw
. �ill����llll�IlAi
—Zo
DUKE
E RHO JR ELECTRIC
C-10 # 675895
N S 84-383 Margarita Ave, Coachella, Ca 92236
760-398-0878 Office 760-398-4812 Fax Email: rhojrelectric@aol.com
W Business License For The City Of La Quints 06437 SITE,LINE DIAGRAM & AREA PLAN
Over Head Installation: 2" Riged Conduit,2 " Weatherhead,3 # 3/0.2 5/8" 8' Ground Rods,# 6 Armou�c
Meter Main 200 Amp Outdoor Nema 3 With Distribution 20/40 \
Jackson St \
Monroe St
> O
Q E E
S z
h o
a
0
O
Existing IID Transformer & Poles
Proposed New Installation From Exisiting IID Transformer: New Pole With Overhead Service
Single Phase 200 Amp 120/240 Volt Meter Main As Per IID SPECS
Exisiting Office Mobile
—Exisiting Mobile Home (To Be Done Away With )
00 O
\ Exisiting 3 Phase 100 Amp 120/208 Volts Meter Main For Ag Pump & Misc
Owner Jack Duke 5$-007 Monroe St LQ t C 92235 760 399 0
Y I P
04 Adr /4* 4 V 4
jew 0�09X6o
Rear Of Mobile Home
Ground
200 Am
Main
a uin a, a, - -$ 04 Eart� Ground
From Meter Main - 100 Amp 2 Pole Breaker- 11/4" PVC Conduit- 3 # 2thhn,1 # 8 Thhn Ground With Termination To J -Box In Seal Tight Flex
I
0
A
ryl
f�_
�J
OV G(/