Loading...
SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project - Biological Monitoring Report (FINAL) Page i SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project BIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT City of La Quinta Riverside County California Submitted to: City of La Quinta 78495 Calle Tampico La Quinta, CA 92253 Contact; Gabriel Perez Planning Manager (760) 777-7062 - Phone (760) 777-7011 - Fax gperez@la-quinta.org Submitted by: Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc. 3120 Chicago Avenue, Suite 110 Riverside, CA 92507 Contact: Michael D. Wilcox Senior Biologist (951) 369-8060 x 225 – Direct (951) 634-9765 – Mobile michael.wilcox@amec.com 7 June 2017 Page ii This page intentionally left blank Page i SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project BIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION .................................................................................................... 1 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & BACKGROUND ................................................................ 4 4.0 METHODS ...................................................................................................................... 4 4.1 Pre-Construction Survey ...................................................................................... 4 4.2 Worker Environmental Awareness Program ......................................................... 5 4.3 Biological Monitoring ............................................................................................ 5 4.4 Activities and Equipment Monitored ..................................................................... 6 5.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................... 6 5.1 Weather Conditions ............................................................................................. 6 5.2 Vegetation............................................................................................................ 7 5.3 Environmentally Sensitive Areas .......................................................................... 7 5.4 Peninsular Bighorn Sheep ................................................................................. 11 5.5 Other Special-status Species ............................................................................. 14 5.6 Common Wildlife Observed ............................................................................... 14 6.0 REGULATORY AGENCY CORRESPONDANCE ......................................................... 15 7.0 CONCULSION .............................................................................................................. 16 8.0 LITERATURE CITED AND REFERENCES .................................................................. 17 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Vicinity & Location ...................................................................................................... 2 Figure 2. Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Alignment Detail .................................. 3 Figure 3. Bird Nests Present along the Project Alignment, Staging Areas & Access Roads .... 10 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Biological Monitoring Data ......................................................................................... 5 Table 2. Project Equipment Noise Levels (dBA) ...................................................................... 9 Page ii LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix 1. Species List: Vascular Plants Appendix 2. Species List: Vertebrate Animals Appendix 3. Photographic Exhibits Appendix 4. Field Monitoring Forms Appendix 5. Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) Appendix 6. WEAP Attendance Records Page iii This page intentionally left blank Page 1 SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project BIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Americas (Amec Foster Wheeler) conducted biological monitoring of the SilverRock Resort (Resort) Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project (Project) located in the city of La Quinta (City), Riverside County, California (Figure 1). Construction of the proposed fence is intended for the protection of the federally listed as endangered, state listed as threatened and fully-protected in California, Peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelson, Distinct Population Segment 2) by preventing access to artificial food and water resources at the golf course and from straying into situations where the sheep might be exposed to lethal urban hazards (USFWS 2017). Biological monitoring of the Project was recommended by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) to ensure that impacts to Peninsular bighorn sheep were avoided and/or minimized to the greatest extent possible during Project construction activities. In addition to the measures implemented for the protection of Peninsular bighorn sheep, Amec Foster Wheeler also provided biological monitoring and implementation of measures for the protection of nesting bird species for compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act [MBTA] and California Fish and Game Code during all Project-related activities. The following report details the biological compliance monitoring conducted for the Project by Amec Foster Wheeler in February and March 2017. 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION The Project site is located along the southern boundary (along and/or immediately adjacent to portions of holes 4, 5, 6, 7, 16, 17 and 18) of the existing SilverRock Resort Golf Course in the city of La Quinta, Riverside County, CA (Township 6 South, Range 7 East, Sections 6, 7, and 8 of the United States Geological Survey [USGS] 7.5’ La Quinta, Calif. Quadrangle) (Figure 1). The Project’s 1.2-mile alignment traverses the toe of slope of the Santa Rosa Mountains, at the interface between the undeveloped natural open space (mountains) and the developed/ landscaped areas of the Resort (Figure 2). The northwestern terminus of the alignment begins at SilverRock’s shared property boundary with the Tradition Golf Club, near the green at hole 4, while the southeastern terminus is at the existing Coachella Valley Water District’s (CVWD) fence along the Coachella Canal, near the tee at hole 17. The Project also occurs along a portion of the northern boundary of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP) Santa Rosa and San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area. Prepared by: Mindy Beohm, Amec Foster WheelerDate prepared: 4/6/2017SilverRock ResortVicinity & LocationTemporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Project 0 1,000 2,000 Feet [ 1 inch = 2,000 feet F I G U R E1Source: World Imagery, CVCC Extended Route, CVCC Ridgeline Alternative B, CVCC Ridgeline Alternative A, La Quinta usgs topo 7.5'RVShare\active projects\Silver Rock PBHS Fence 1755401001 Legend SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Alignment ^_ Prepared by: Mindy Beohm, Amec Foster WheelerDate prepared: 4/6/2017SilverRock ResortAlignment DetailTemporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Project 0 270 540 Feet [ 1 inch = 540 feet F I G U R E2Source: World Imagery, CVCC Extended Route, CVCC Ridgeline Alternative B, CVCC Ridgeline Alternative A, RVShare\active projects\Silver Rock PBHS Fence 1755401001 Legend SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Alignment Page 4 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION & BACKGROUND The temporary Peninsular bighorn sheep fence is 1.2 miles in length, eight (8) feet above the surface of the ground in height, colored to match the natural earth tones of the adjacent Santa Rosa Mountains, and held in place by 12-foot long steel posts countersunk up to approximately 4 feet in depth. The purpose of the temporary fence is to exclude the federally listed as endangered, state listed as threatened and fully protected in California, Peninsular bighorn Sheep from the grounds of the Resort, preventing access to artificial food and water resources and from straying into situations where the protected animals may be exposed to lethal urban hazards (USFWS 2017). In addition to the above-referenced potential hazards to Peninsular bighorn sheep currently present on the grounds of the Resort and the developed urban environment present elsewhere, the City, along with SilverRock Development Company, LLC, proposes the future development of a variety of new structures, amenities and restructuring of the existing Resort, which will include a new luxury hotel, residential dwellings, a conference and shared services facility, a mixed-use village, resort residential village, renovation of the existing Ahmanson Ranch House, construction of a new permanent golf clubhouse, restructuring and redevelopment of portions of the existing golf course and associated road and utility infrastructure. Construction for the above-referenced project is currently scheduled to begin in 2017. The temporary fence will also help ensure that Peninsular bighorn sheep are not affected by construction associated with the future development of the Resort. 4.0 METHODS 4.1 Pre-Construction Survey Prior to commencement of construction of the fence, Amec Foster Wheeler senior biologists Nathan T. Moorhatch and Michael D. Wilcox conducted a pre-construction survey of the alignment on 23 February 2017. The pre-construction survey was conducted on-foot between the hours of 0700 and 1230. Weather conditions (temperature range, wind speeds and cloud cover), vegetation communities and flora and fauna observed or detected, including special-status biological resources, were recorded in field notes and appended at the end of this report. Where special-status biological resources (i.e., active bird nests) were detected along and in the immediate vicinity of the alignment, the resource and its location were photographed, mapped using a handheld Global Positioning System (GPS), staked in the field and marked as an Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA). Copies of the map illustrating the locations of the active bird nests were provided to on-site personnel prior to commencement of Project activities. Scientific nomenclature for this document follows standard reference sources: For plant communities, CVMSHCP (CVAG 2008), CDFW (2015a), Holland (1986) and Sawyer et al (2009); for flora, Jepson eFlora (2015) and the USDA NRCS PLANTS Database (2015); for amphibians, reptiles, and mammals, CDFW (2016); and for birds, American Ornithologists Union (2016). Page 5 4.2 Worker Environmental Awareness Program Prior to commencement of Project activities, a Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) was administered to all on-site Project personnel by Amec Foster Wheeler senior biologist Michael D. Wilcox (Appendix 5). Content of the WEAP included, but was not limited to: the background and purpose of the proposed Project; natural history, ecology, description, conservation status and photographs of Peninsular bighorn sheep as well as other special-status biological resources (i.e., sensitive plants, reptiles, birds and mammals) potentially occurring on the Project site; identification and locations of staked ESAs; impact avoidance and minimization measures recommended by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW); as well as the potential penalties for unauthorized impacts to Peninsular bighorn sheep and other special-status biological resources. Color copies of the WEAP, which included contact information for the biological monitors, Amec Foster Wheeler project management and associated regulatory agencies were provided to all Project personnel. Following completion of the WEAP, personnel in attendance were required to sign an attendance and acknowledgement form and agreement to comply with the Project-specific impact avoidance and minimization measures (Appendix 6). 4.3 Biological Monitoring Biological monitoring was conducted daily by Amec Foster Wheeler senior biologists Nathan T. Moorhatch and/or Michael D. Wilcox during all on-site Project-related activities (Table 1). Biological monitoring/Project activities commenced on 28 February 2017 and continued daily, Monday through Friday, until 30 March 2017. Pertinent field data, including, but not limited to: date; time; weather conditions, descriptions of activities, areas and equipment monitored; special- status biological resources and common species detected were recorded on field monitoring forms (Appendix 4) and provided daily to the on-site city construction inspector James Peters. Scanned copies of the field monitoring forms were also provided electronically to USFWS biologist Jenness McBride and CDFW biologist Kevin Brennan at the end of each work week. Prior to commencement of daily fence installation work, the on-site biological monitor conducted pre-construction clearance sweeps of the work area(s) along the alignment to locate and determine the current status of any special-status biological resources (i.e., presence of Peninsular bighorn sheep or other special-status species and/or active bird nests). When special- status biological resources were detected in the vicinity of the work area(s), the biological monitor would notify the crew of its presence and advise the crew of any recommended impact avoidance/minimization measures necessary to avoid or minimize impacts in the ESA. Table 1. Biological Monitoring Data Date Biologist Activities Monitored Special-status Biological Resources Observed/Monitored 2/23/17 Moorhatch & Wilcox Pre-construction Survey (prior to commencement of Project activities) PBS; active bird nests (MODO & VERD) detected & mapped. VEFL & BTGN observations. 2/28/17 Wilcox Fence Post Staging & Installation None 3/01/17 Wilcox Fence Post Installation None 3/02/17 Wilcox Fence Post Staging & Installation Active bird nest (HOFI) 3/03/17 Moorhatch Fence Post Installation Active bird nest (MODO) 3/06/17 Wilcox Fence Post Installation Active bird nests (MODO) Page 6 3/07/17 Wilcox Fence Post Installation PBS, active bird nests (MODO & VERD) 3/08/17 Moorhatch Fence Post Installation Active bird nests (MODO & VERD) 3/09/17 Wilcox Fence Post Installation Active bird nests (CLSW) 3/10/17 Moorhatch Fence Post Installation Active bird nests (MODO) 3/13/17 Wilcox Fence Post Installation Active bird nest (MODO) 3/14/17 Moorhatch Fence Post Installation, Concrete PBS 3/15/17 Moorhatch Stringing, Concrete Active bird nests (BTGN) 3/16/17 Wilcox Staging, Stringing, Concrete PBS 3/17/17 Wilcox Stringing, Hanging Fabric PBS 3/20/17 Wilcox Staging, Stringing, Concrete PBS 3/21/17 Wilcox Staging, Hanging Fabric PBS, bird nests (VEFL & CANW) 3/22/17 Moorhatch Stringing Active bird nest (MODO) 3/23/17 Wilcox Stringing, Staging, Hanging Fabric PBS 3/24/17 Moorhatch Stringing Active bird nest (MODO) 3/27/17 Wilcox Stringing, Staging, Concrete Active bird nests (MODO, VERD, NOMO) 3/28/17 Moorhatch Hanging Fabric Active bird nest (MODO) 3/29/17 Wilcox Hardware, Site Clean-up Active bird nests (MODO, VERD, NOMO) 3/30/17 Moorhatch Hardware, Closing Panels PBS, active bird nests (MODO) PBS – Peninsular bighorn sheep, HOFI – House finch, MODO – Mourning dove, VERD – Verdin, CLSW – Cliff swallow, BTGN – Black-tailed gnatcatcher, VEFL – Vermilion flycatcher, CANW – Canyon wren, NOMO – Northern mockingbird 4.4 Activities and Equipment Monitored Fence installation activities monitored included: 1) staging of fence materials (i.e., fence posts, tension wires, rolls of fabric and removable panels); 2) installation of/setting fence posts; 3) pouring concrete reinforcement of fence posts; 3) stringing tension wires; 4) installation of/hanging fence fabric (chain link); 4) attaching hardware (brackets, hog rings, various reinforcements); and 5) installation of/hanging removable panels. Heavy equipment used for fence installation included: 1) work vehicles (i.e., small utility vehicles [XRT 1550 club car], golf carts, flatbed truck, personnel vehicles); 2) flatbed and utility trailers; 3) small tractor, 4) Cat 2578 compact (rubber) track loader with various attachments; 5) pneumatic hammer/fence post driver; 6) portable generator and; 7) various hand tools. Staging of fence materials was conducted with the use of small utility vehicles, flatbed truck and on foot. Much of the fence post installation was completed on foot with the use of a pneumatic hammer/fence post driver, however, fence post installation within the staked Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) was completed with a compact (rubber) track loader with a small auger and drill bit attachment and on foot/by hand. Installation/hanging of the chain link fence fabric was completed using the compact (rubber) track loader with a Fence Hog/fence installer and by hand. Installation of the removable panels was completed on foot, by hand. Attachment of the various small hardware (i.e., brackets, couplings, hog rings, etc.) was completed on foot/by hand. 5.0 RESULTS 5.1 Weather Conditions Weather conditions present during Project implementation were relatively mild and pleasant. Temperatures ranged between 50º Fahrenheit (F) and 96ºF. Wind speeds varied from calm (0 Page 7 miles per hour [mph]) to gusty (25 mph) and skies ranged from clear (0% cloud cover) to overcast and cloudy (100% cloud cover). 5.2 Vegetation The Project alignment occurs along the perimeter of portions of the golf course, at the interface between the neatly manicured greens, tees and fairways, the beautifully xeriscaped and almost natural-looking desert plantings and the natural Sonoran creosote bush scrub community present on the foothills of the adjacent Santa Rosa Mountains. Vegetation present along the alignment included a relatively sparse mixture of landscaped/planted ornamental and/or possibly remnant native trees, shrubs, cacti, succulents, annual grasses and forbs. The neatly manicured greens, fairways and tees of the golf course were also present, immediately adjacent to the alignment in many areas. The dominant vegetation community throughout the alignment most closely aligns with Sonoran creosote bush scrub (CVAG 2009). Sawyer et. al. (2009) refers to this community as “Larrea tridentata-Ambrosia dumosa shrubland alliance (creosote bush-white burr sage scrub)”. Representative dominant perennial plant species observed included, but were not limited to: creosote bush (Larrea tridentata), burrowbush (Ambrosia dumosa), brittlebush (Encelia farinosa), allscale (Atriplex polycarpa), quailbush (Atriplex lentiformis), sweetbush (Bebbia juncea var. aspera), desert lavender (Condea emoryi), catclaw acacia (Senegalia greggii), honey mesquite (Prosopis glandulosa), blue palo verde (Parkinsonia florida) and desert willow (Chilopsis linearis). It should be noted, however, that the alignment occurs along the edge of, at the interface between the natural Larrea tridentata-Ambrosia dumosa shrubland alliance (creosote bush-white burr sage scrub) vegetation community present on the undeveloped slopes of the Santa Rosa Mountains and the landscaped and neatly manicured grounds of the SilverRock Resort. 5.3 Environmentally Sensitive Areas A total of at least ten (10) active bird nests were detected along, and in the immediate vicinity of the alignment during the pre-construction surveys and during routine monitoring of the Project. These included: two (2) mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) nests, two (2) verdin (Auriparus flaviceps) nests, one (1) house finch (Haemorhous mexicanus) nest, one (1) northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) nest, one (1) canyon wren (Catherpes mexicanus) nest, one (1) black-tailed gnatcatcher (Polioptila melanura) nest, (1) vermilion flycatcher (Pyrocephalus rubinus) nest; and an unknown number of cliff swallow nests located beneath a golf cart bridge over the Coachella Canal in the vicinity of the southeastern terminus of the alignment (Figure 3). Several other active bird nests were also detected, however, were located on the adjacent, steep rocky cliffs high above the alignment and out of harm’s way. These included: common raven (Corvus corax), white-throated swift (Aeronautes saxatalis) and red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis) nests. Although the common raven, white-throated swift and red-tailed hawk nests were routinely monitored from a distance with binoculars, no special attention or impact avoidance or minimization measures were recommended or implemented for these. Furthermore, additional bird nests detected in the vicinity of the alignment that were later confirmed to be inactive, were also mapped and monitored throughout the life of the Project (Figure 3). Page 8 ESAs were established and staked around two (2) of the mourning dove nests and two (2) of the verdin nests as these nests were located in the immediate vicinity (within 30 feet) of the alignment. Upon arrival at the site on the first day of Project activities, one (1) of the verdin nests in the established ESA had been abandoned by the birds between the date of the pre-construction survey and commencement of Project activities. For this reason, the ESA at this location was removed and no further actions were recommended or implemented at this location. ESAs for two of the active (2) mourning dove nests and one (1) active verdin nest were established and closely monitored on a daily basis. These ESAs were locations where impact avoidance and minimization measures were implemented on a case-by-case basis. Fence post installation proceeded along the alignment, generally from the northwest terminus to the southeast terminus, temporarily skipping the areas within the established ESAs. Installation of the fence posts in the ESAs were temporarily postponed and completed after installation of the fence posts throughout the remainder of the alignment, allowing additional time to determine and implement impact avoidance and minimization measures in those areas. Increases in noise can disrupt the normal behavior patterns of wildlife, sometimes resulting in displacement of these animals. Some bird species may abandon nests if nearby noise levels are excessive. For these reasons, prior to commencement of fence post installation within the established ESAs, noise meter readings were recorded with a handheld sound level meter at various distances/intervals away from the equipment proposed for installation (i.e., pneumatic hammer/fence post driver, portable generator and the compact track sk ip loader). The resulting noise levels (recorded in decibels [dBA]) for the equipment is provided in Table 2 below. The data recorded with the sound level meter indicated that the pneumatic hammer/fence post driver, which also requires the use of a portable generator, was significantly louder than the compact track skip loader with the drill bit attachment. At 10 feet, noise levels of the pneumatic hammer/fence post driver were between 108 and 110 dBA, while noise levels of the compact track skip loader with the drill attachment ranged between 74 and 81 dBA. Use of the pneumatic hammer/fence post driver also required use of a portable generator. Noise levels of the portable generator were 75 dBA at 10 feet. Noise levels of the various equipment gradually decrease with increased distance. For instance, at 50 feet, noise levels of the pneumatic hammer/fence post driver were between 91 and 93 dBA, while noise levels of the compact track skip loader with the drill attachment at 50 feet ranged between 55 and 63 dBA. Use of the pneumatic hammer/fence post driver also required use of a portable generator. Noise levels of the portable generator at 50 feet were 60 dBA. Although various studies on the effects of noise levels on wildlife have been published, noise- related effects on wildlife are highly complex and vary from species to species, season to season, under various environmental factors and according to the type and duration of noise exposure. In general, for the purposes of temporary loud noises generated by construction activities such as those associated with this Project, increases in ambient noise levels in excess of approximately 60 dBA were considered to be the threshold for impact minimization implementation. Page 9 Table 2. Project Equipment Noise Levels (dBA) Equipment 10 ft. 20 ft. 30 ft. 40 ft. 50 ft. Pneumatic Hammer/Fence Post Driver 108-110 dBA 101-104 dBA 96-98 dBA 93-95 dBA 91-93 dBA Portable Generator 75 dBA 72 dBA 67 dBA 64 dBA 60 dBA Compact Track Skip Loader/Drill Rig 74-81 dBA 70-72 dBA 61-68 dBA 58-66 dBA 55-63 dBA Prior to fence post installation within the ESAs established around the active bird nests in close proximity to the alignment, several impact minimization measures were identified and considered. These included: 1) fence post installation with hand tools only (no mechanical equipment), 2) fence post installation with quieter equipment and/or 3) use of a temporary sound wall to be deployed in between noise generating equipment and the active nests. A temporary sound wall was constructed and staged at one of the ESAs, ready for deployment. It should be noted that all of the on-site bird nests were constructed and were currently located on the grounds of, or immediately adjacent to an active golf course, in areas that are routinely subjected to significant levels of human activities (i.e., presence of golfers, golf carts as well as daily landscaping activities such as operation of commercial-grade ride-mowers, gas-powered leaf blowers and edgers, etc.). After careful consideration and analysis of each species in question, the locations of each nest relative to the respective areas of existing routine human activities as well as the existing vegetative and topographic barriers, it was determined that the crew would initially begin installation of the fence posts using the quietest equipment (the compact track skip loader with the auger/drill bit attachment) and by hand, while the on-site biologist concurrently monitored the nest/bird for any signs of distress (i.e., erratic movements, excessive scolding, flushing). During fence post installation in the ESAs, the biological monitor stood in between the nests and the equipment at each post location to serve as a visual barrier and focal point for the bird. The idea behind this methodology was to provide a stationary, non-threatening focal point for the birds while fence post installation (movements, sounds and activities that might otherwise be interpreted by the bird as threatening) occurred behind the biologist and out of view of the bird sitting on the nest. This methodology proved effective as the birds sitting on the nest never exhibited any visible signs of distress, flushed or abandoned the nest during Project activities. Continuous daily monitoring of the active nests confirmed that all active nests detected along the alignment remained active following Project activities in the respective areas. XW XW GF XW GF XW ^_ ^_ !( XWXW #* GFXW GFGF XW %, ")") ") XW XW $+ '4 '­ !. kj Prepared by: Mindy Beohm, Amec Foster WheelerDate prepared: 4/6/2017SilverRock Resort Bird Nests Te mp orary Pen insula r Bigh orn Sh eep Fe nce Installation Pro ject 0 250 500 Feet [ 1 inch = 500 feet F I G U R E3Source: World Imagery, CVCC Extended Route, CVCC Ridgeline Alternative B, CVCC Ridgeline Alternative ARVShare\active projects\Silver Rock PBHS Fence 1755401001 Legend Temporary Fence Alignment Inactive Nests") Mourning Dove_ Red-tailed Haw k( VerdinW ")Active N ests House Finch* Cup NestsF Canyon Wren4 Verm ilion Flycatcher- Northern Mockingbird. Comm on R aven) Cliff Swa llow, White-throated Swift+ Black-ta iled G natcatcherj Page 11 5.4 Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Peninsular bighorn sheep were detected on eight (8) of the 23 work days (34.7%), not counting the day of the pre-construction survey (23 February 2017) prior to commencement of Project activities. While detected on these eight (8) days, the animals were usually off-site and a significant distance from the alignment and work area, requiring no special attention other than monitoring. The sheep occurred on the alignment, in the vicinity of the work area on three (3) occasions: 7, 16 and 21 March 2017. The Peninsular bighorn sheep observations are summarized separately by date below. Peninsular bighorn sheep were observed on the golf course and on the adjacent mountain slopes during the pre-construction survey conducted on 23 February 2017. A herd of 14 sheep were initially observed on the ridgeline high above the golf course at approximately 1100. This group descended the rocky slopes over the course of approximately 10 minutes, crossed over the proposed alignment and entered on to the manicured fairway of hole 16 and proceeded to graze on the grass. Several presumably young (smaller) animals were observed playfully jumping, kicking and running about while the larger adult animals walked across the fairway, intermittently pausing to graze at various locations. Approximately 30 minutes later, a group three additional animals were again observed on the same ridgeline high above the golf course. These animals eventually made their way down the slopes and onto the golf course. At the completion of the survey, a total of 20 animals were counted at various locations of the golf course. During the course of routine biological monitoring of Project activities, Peninsular bighorn sheep were observed on 7, 14, 16, 17, 20, 21, 23 and 30 March 2017. Each of these observations are summarized separately below. At 0845 on Tuesday, 7 March 2017, two (2) Peninsular bighorn sheep were observed at the very top of the ridgeline overlooking the golf course. At 0945, the (presumably) same two (2) sheep entered the golf course in the vicinity of the ladies’ tee at hole 17 and made their way to the active work site. One animal appeared to be an adult ewe and the other a juvenile male (but not a lamb). Both appeared to be healthy; no indication of mucous or discharge around the eyes or nares were observed. Neither were collared or tagged. Fence post installation was occurring across from the green at the same hole, approximately 400 feet to the north west of where the sheep entered the course. Upon observation of the sheep on the golf course, I pointed them out to the crew. This was our first sighting since the commencement of the Project. The crew voluntarily ceased working to take cell phone pictures of the distant animals. As we were quietly observing and taking photographs, the sheep quickly closed the gap between us and directly approached us, coming within approximately 60 feet. The crew made no sudden movement or loud noises while the sheep were in close proximity. The sheep entered the work area and forage on the native vegetation just west of the golf cart path and along the east-facing toe of slope. The crew continued to quietly observe and take pictures of the sheep for approximately 15 minutes. At no time did anyone approach the animals. After foraging along the toe of slope for approximately 5 minutes, the sheep proceeded up the steep, east-facing slopes south of the work area, intermittently pausing to forage. After the sheep had gained approximately 200 feet in elevation and were approximately 300 feet away from the work area, the crew continued working, installing Page 12 fence posts with the pneumatic hammer/post driver. The sheep were closely monitored through binoculars as the fence post installation commenced and were continuously monitored until they made it out of sight for any sign of distress. At no time did the sheep stop foraging, flinch, raise their heads or even look toward the noise generated by the work and noise. At 1430, later the same day (7 March 2017), a sheep was observed on a low ridgeline overlooking the golf course just south of the tee at hole 16. After approximately 5 minutes, the animal disappeared out of view. Amec Foster Wheeler was later informed by golf course personnel that approximately eight (8) sheep were observed on the course in the vicinity of hole 16. The animal did not appear to be collared or tagged and gender was not determined. On Tuesday, 14 March 2017, Peninsular bighorn sheep were observed on the top of a ridgeline, high above the alignment. At no time did the sheep descend the slopes and occur on-site, along the alignment or on the golf course during the work day. At 1322 on Thursday, 16 March 2017, a young male Peninsular bighorn sheep was observed in the vicinity of the green at hole 5 as it came around the corner of the where the rocky ridgeline meets the golf course from the south. It proceeded to forage along the alignment approximately 400 feet from the work area. The crew were stringing wire at the time and were not generating any noise or conducting any activities that would potentially disrupt the behavior of the animal. The crew was alerted of the presence of the animal. Work was temporarily paused while personnel quietly took photographs with their cell phones and observed the animal. The individual ascended the rocky slope to a shaded area beneath a steep cliff approximately 100 feet south of and above the alignment where it laid down and rested for approximately one (1) hour. The sheep was closely monitored for approximately one hour, until it got up and ascended the steep slopes to the southeast out of sight. The sheep was a young male and appeared to be healthy; no discharge was observed around the eyes or nares. At 1400 on Friday, 17 March 2017, a single sheep was observed at the top of the ridgeline, high above the alignment in the vicinity of hole 5. The animal was observed for approximately 15 minutes until it disappeared from sight over the ridge to the south. At no time during Project operations did this animal come onto the golf course or work area. The animal did not appear to be collared and gender could not be determined. From 1330 to 1500 on Monday 20 March 2017, a total of six (6) Peninsular bighorn sheep (including one [1] collared individual and one [1] lamb) were initially observed on a ridgeline high above the alignment in the vicinity of hole 16. At 1600 on Monday, 20 March 2017, just as the crew was packing up and preparing to leave the site for the day, a herd of Peninsular bighorn sheep consisting of seven (7) individuals (including four [4] adults, two [2] of which were collared, and three [3] lambs) was observed again in the same general area (slopes above hole 16) but much lower than the observation earlier in the day. It is assumed that some of these animals were the same individuals observed earlier. The herd was standing on a ridgeline approximately 200 feet above and south of the alignment. The crew was alerted to their presence as they continued packing up for the day. Work ceased and the site was left shortly thereafter. The sheep did not enter into the work area or the alignment while Page 13 the crew was present. All of the sheep appeared to be healthy and did not exhibit any behaviors that would indicate they were disturbed by our presence or activities associated with the Project. At 1258 on Tuesday, 21 March 2017, a small group of sheep consisting of two (2) adult females and one (1) lamb were observed crossing the golf cart bridge over the Coachella Canal just south of hole 16, at the southern terminus of the Project alignment. They had been on the east side of the canal and were returning the west side, where the mountainous habitat is. After crossing the bridge they proceeded along the golf cart path and alignment then gradually ascended up the rocky slopes of the Santa Rosa Mountains. One of the adult females was radio collared and had an ear tag (#17) and a lamb. I watched the group for approximately 30 minutes as they ascended the rocky slopes, pausing intermittently to look over the golf course. At one point, I watch the lamb attempt to suckle the tagged female. The lamb forcefully rammed/head-butted (for lack of a better words), the female’s stomach area several times with the top of his head. After a several strong rammings/head-butts, the mother kicked the lamb with her hind leg and it ceased attempting to suckle. A few minutes later, at 1319 on Tuesday 21 March 2017, another herd of at least eleven (11) sheep were observed descending the next ridgeline to the northwest. This group contained at least one (1) adult male, one (1) collared/tagged female (#158) with a lamb, as well as number of other females and lambs (at least 3 other females with lambs). This group foraged along the rocky valley between ridges, slowly ascending over the period of about 40 minutes (until we left for the day at about 1600). The first group of three (3) individuals observed earlier was also observed foraging and ascending the same general area but maintained a considerable distance from this larger group at all times, separated by at least 200-300 feet. Behaviors observed included foraging, ascending and descending, jumping from rock to rock and lambs suckling. At 0757 on Thursday, 23 March 2017, a herd of eight (8) Peninsular bighorn sheep (including seven [7] adults and one [1] lamb) were observed standing on the highest peak of a ridgeline high above the alignment in the vicinity of hole #17. The herd remained visible of approximately 1.5 hours until the disappeared from view. At no time did any sheep enter the work are a, the alignment or golf course while we were present. At 1030, on Thursday, 30 March 2017, a herd of sixteen (16) sheep (including two [2] collared adults and five [5] lambs) was observed on a ridgeline high above the alignment. The herd was closely monitored for the remainder of the day. In the afternoon, the herd came down the slopes to the vicinity of the alignment but did not approach the fence or pass through any of the openings (i.e., where the removable panels are located but currently open). The crew and City of La Quinta staff that were present at the time were alerted to their presence and participated in the visual monitoring of the animals. At the very end of the day on Thursday, 30 March 2017 and after receipt of authorizations from USFWS biologist Chris Gregory and CDFW biologist Kevin Brennan, on-site Amec Foster Wheeler senior biologist, Nathan Moorhatch, conducted the final clearance sweep of the entire SilverRock golf course. Following completion of the clearance sweep and confirmation that no Peninsular bighorn sheep were present anywhere on the golf course, all of the panels along the entire fence line were closed. Page 14 5.5 Other Special-status Species In addition to Peninsular bighorn sheep, three (3) other special-status species were observed on- site or in the immediate vicinity of the Project alignment. These included: black-tailed gnatcatcher (Polioptila melanura), vermilion flycatcher (Pyrocephalus rubinus) and prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus). These observations are summarized individually below. Black-tailed gnatcatchers were routinely observed during the course of Project activities and multiple pairs appear to be resident along the alignment. On 15 March 2017, an active black - tailed gnatcatcher nest was detected in a blue palo verde located in one of the xeriscaped areas between holes 5 and 6. The location of the nest was approximately 40 feet north of the alignment and not in danger of being affected by Project activities. Following the initial nest discovery, the nest could no longer be located. It is presumed that this nest was either subject to predation and destroyed in the process or possibly blown down in high winds. Black-tailed gnatcatchers are not federally or state-listed as threatened or endangered, however, are designated as a “Watch List” species by the CDFW. Vermilion flycatchers were also observed on a daily basis throughout the life of the Project and multiple pairs are believed to be resident on the golf course. On 21 March 2017, an active vermilion flycatcher nest was discovered in an ornamental Acacia located in the same xeriscaped area between hole 5 and 6 described above. The location of this nest was approximately 75 feet north of the alignment and not in danger of being affected by Project activities. The female vermillion flycatcher was closely monitored as she collected nesting materials (fibers from the trunks of ornamental acacias and fan palms in the immediate vicinity), delivered and added the materials to the nest. By 27 March 2017, the vermilion flycatcher nest was gone. It is presumed that this nest was blown down in the high winds that were present over the weekend as a storm system moved through the area. Vermilion flycatchers are not federally or state-listed as threatened or endangered, however, are designated as a “Species of Concern” by the CDFW. A single prairie falcon was observed flying over and along the steep rocky slopes of the Santa Rosa Mountains in the vicinity of the Project alignment. Prairie falcons are not federally or state- listed as threatened or endangered, however, are designated as “Birds of Conservation Concern” by the USFWS and considered a “Watch List” species by the CDFW. 5.6 Common Wildlife Observed Common vertebrates observed on-site and/or in the immediate vicinity of the alignment during the biological monitoring conducted for the Project included a total of seventy-seven (77) species. Most were identified to species; however, some could only be identified to class as in the case of rodent burrows. The total vertebrate fauna observed included: two (2) fish, one (1) amphibian, reptiles (9) reptiles, fifty-nine (59) birds, and six (6) mammals. See Appendix 2 for a complete list of all wildlife species detected. The only fish detected were schools of mosquitofish in some of the water hazards on the golf course and carp beneath the bridge over the Coachella Canal in the vicinity of the southeastern terminus of the Project alignment. Page 15 One amphibian, Rocky Mountain toad (Anaxyrus woodhousii woodhousii) was detected on-site. Rocky Mountain toad, also commonly called Woodhouse’s toad, is an introduced species to the Coachella Valley. A single individual was found dead on arrival (DOA) in one of the golf cart paths, presumed run over by one of the early morning grounds keepers, in the vicinity of hole 6. The nine (9) common reptile species were observed included: western side-blotched lizard (Uta stansburiana elegans), desert spiny lizard (Sceloporus magister), banded rock lizard (Petrosaurus mearnsi), western long-tailed brush lizard (Urosaurus graciosus graciosus), common chuckwalla (Sauromalus ater), western whiptail (Aspidoscelis tigris), desert banded gecko (Coleonyx variegatus variegatus), red-eared slider (Trachemys scripta elegans) and red racer (Coluber flagellum piceus). None of these were unexpected and all, with the exception of the red-eared slider, are native species to the Coachella Valley. A total of fifty-nine (59) species of birds were observed on-site or in the immediate vicinity. Representative examples include, but are not limited to: great blue heron (Ardea herodias), red- tailed hawk, American kestrel (Falco sparverius), mourning dove, greater roadrunner (Geococcyx californianus), Anna's hummingbird (Calypte anna), Say's phoebe (Sayornis saya), common raven, verdin, rock wren (Salpinctes obsoletus), black-tailed gnatcatcher, Abert's towhee (Pipilo aberti) and white-crowned sparrow (Zonotrichia leucophrys). The six (6) mammal species detected onsite included: Peninsular bighorn sheep, coyote (Canis latrans), desert woodrat (Neotoma cf. lepida), desert cottontail (Sylvilagus audubonii), California ground squirrel (Otospermophilus beecheyi) and western pipistrelle (Parastrellus hesperus). A comprehensive list of vertebrates observed is included in Appendix 2. 6.0 REGULATORY AGENCY CORRESPONDANCE Prior to commencement of Project activities, CDFW biologist Kevin Brennan was consulted over the telephone regarding pre-construction survey and biological monitoring methodologies. At the end of each work week, a weekly biological monitoring report along with scanned copies of the field monitoring forms were e-mailed Mr. Brennan and USFWS biologist Jenness McBride. On Thursday, 9 March 2017, Mr. Marcus Nelson, a biologist with The Bighorn Institute visited the Project site and requested to speak with the on-site biological monitor. Mr. Nelson was advised of all sheep observations to date. On Friday, 24 March 2017, USFWS biologist Chris Gregory visited the site and spoke with Amec Foster Wheeler senior biologist Nathan Moorhatch. Mr. Moorhatch briefed Mr. Gregory of our sheep observations for the week and during the life of the Project in addition to the active bird nest monitoring and other special-status species observations. It is Amec Foster Wheeler’s professional opinion that the actions (watching, photographing and fence post installation) had no effect on any of the Peninsular bighorn sheep observed during Project implementation. Neither were collared or tagged. Page 16 7.0 CONCULSION Installation of the temporary Peninsular bighorn sheep fence at the SilverRock Resort was successfully completed within 30 days. There were no incidents, non-compliance issues or unauthorized impacts to special-status biological resources to report. Measures developed during project planning, incorporated into project design and implemented on-site during fence installation resulted in 100% avoidance of impacts to Peninsular bighorn sheep and the actively nesting bird species present along the Project alignment. Additionally, adaptive measures such as switching from the significantly loud pneumatic hammer/fence post driver to the much quieter compact track skip loader/drill rig for installation of the fence posts within in the established ESAs prevented the need for sound wall deployment and resulted in fence post installation without impacting the nesting birds nearby. Although the newly-installed temporary fence is expected to prevent Peninsular bighorn sheep from accessing the Resort from the slopes of the adjacent Santa Rosa Mountains, there is nothing preventing the species from accessing the Resort from PGA West to the southeast. To prevent further access, Amec Foster Wheeler recommends that the City install a similar fence or effective barrier along the southeastern-most Resort boundaries. Otherwise, Peninsular bighorn sheep will eventually find their way back to the grounds of the Resort and be in danger of being trapped on the wrong side of the fence. Page 17 8.0 LITERATURE CITED AND REFERENCES American Ornithologists' Union. 2016. Check-list of North American Birds, 7th edition + supplements. Accessed online at: http://americanornithology.org/content/aou-checklist- north-and-middle-american-birds-7th-edition-and-supplements California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2015. Fish and Game Code of California. http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/calaw.html CDFW . 2016. Complete List of Amphibian, Reptile, Bird and Mammal Species in California. Online at: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=87155&inline=1 CDFW . 2017. Special Animals List, April 2017. Periodic publication. Online at: https://nrm.dfg.ca.gov/FileHandler.ashx?DocumentID=109406 Coachella Valley Association of Government (CVAG). 2008. Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan. Accessed online at: cvmshcp.org Holland, R.F. 1986. Preliminary Descriptions of the Terrestrial Natural Communities of California. Prepared for the California Department of Fish and Game. Jepson Flora Project. 2015. Jepson eFlora. Accessed online at: http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/IJM.html Sawyer, J.O., T. Keeler-Wolf, and J.M. Evens. 2009. A manual of California vegetation (2nd ed.). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, CA. USDA, NRCS. 2015b. The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Team. Accessed online at: plants.usda.gov USFWS. 2015. Bird Laws and Treaties. Accessed online at: http://www.fws.gov/migratorybirds/RegulationsandPolicies.html APPENDIX 1 SPECIES LIST: VASCULAR PLANTS This page intentionally left blank Page 1-1 APPENDIX 1 SPECIES LIST: VASCULAR PLANTS This list reports only plants observed on the Project site during the pre-construction surveys and biological monitoring conducted for the Project. Other species may have been overlooked or undetectable due to their growing season. Unless noted otherwise, nomenclature and systematics follows Jepson Flora Project (2014) = non-native species, sp. = identified only to genus, cf= compares favorably with]. Common names not provided by Jepson Flora Project follows those provided by USDA, NRCS (2015b). [†= special status species, * = non-native species, sp. = identified only to genus, cf= compares favorably with] DICOTYLEDONEAE DICOT FLOWERING PLANTS Anacardiaceae Sumac Family *Schinus molle Peruvian pepper tree Asteraceae Sunflower Family Ambrosia dumosa white bur-sage Ambrosia salsola common burrowbrush, cheesebush Bebbia juncea var. aspera sweetbush Dicoria canescens desert twinbugs Encelia farinosa brittlebush Palafoxia arida desert palafox Perityle emoryi Emory’s rock daisy Peucephyllum schottii Schott’s pygmy-cedar Pluchea sericea arrow-weed Bignoniaceae Trumpet-Creeper Family Chilopsis linearis desert willow Boraginaceae Forget-me-not Family Cryptantha sp. cryptantha sp. Phacelia sp. phacelia sp. Brassicaceae Mustard Family *Sisymbrium cf. altissimum tumble mustard *Sisymbrium cf. irio London rocket Cactaceae Cactus Family Ferocactus cylindraceus California barrel cactus (on adjacent slopes) Opuntia basilaris beavertail pricklypear (planted) Opuntia cf. littoralis pricklypear (planted) Chenopodiaceae Goosefoot Family Atriplex canescens four-wing saltbush Page 1-2 Atriplex lentiformis big saltbush Atriplex polycarpa allscale saltbush *Salsola tragus Russian thistle, tumbleweed Curbitacaeae Cucumber Family Brandegia biglovii desert star-vine Fabaceae Pea Family Senegalia greggii catclaw, Devil’s claw *Acacia sp. Acacia sp. *Parkinsonia aculeata Mexican palo verde Parkinsonia florida blue palo verde Prosopis glandulosa honey mesquite *cf. Vachellia constricta whitethorn acacia Fouquieriaceae Ocotillo Family Fouquieria splendens octolillo (on adjacent slopes) Geraniaceae Geranium Family *Erodium cicutarium redstem filaree Lamiaceae Mint Family Condea emoryi desert lavendar Malvaceae Mallow Family Eremalche rotundifolia desert five spot *Malva sp. mallow Sphaeralcea ambigua apricot mallow Onagraceae Evening Primrose Family Chylismia claviformis browneyes Nyctaginiaceae Bougainvillea Family *Bougainvillea glabra bougainvillea Mirabilis cf. laevis wishbone bush Salicaceae Willow Family Populus fremontii Freemont cottonwood Solanaceae Nightshade Family Datura discolor desert thornapple Lycium sp. nightshade Nicotiana obtusifolia desert tobacco Tamaricaceae Tamarisk Family *Tamarix aphylla athel Page 1-3 *Tamarix ramosissima salt cedar Zygophyllaceae Caltrop Family Larrea tridentata creosote bush MONOCOTYLEDONEAE MONOCOT FLOWERING PLANTS Arecaceae Palm Family Washingtonia filifera California fan palm *Washingtonia robusta Mexican fan palm Poaceae Grass Family *Cynodon dactylon Bermuda grass *Pennisetum setaceum crimson fountain grass *Schismus cf. arabicus Arabian schismus *Schismus barbatus common Mediterranean grass APPENDIX 2 SPECIES LIST: VERTEBRATE ANIMALS This page intentionally left blank Page 2-1 APPENDIX 2 SPECIES LIST: VERTEBRATE ANIMALS This list reports only the vertebrate animals observed on the Project site during the pre- construction surveys and biological monitoring conducted for the Project. Other species may have been overlooked or undetectable due to their activity patterns or weather conditions. [†= special status species, * = non-native species, sp. = identified only to genus, cf = compares favorably with] VERTEBRATES ACTINOPTERYGII BONY FISHES Cyprinidae Carp & Minnows *Unknown unknown species of carp Poeciliidae Poeciliid Fish *Gambusia affinis mosquitofish ANURA FROGS & TOADS Bufonidae True Toads *Anaxyrus woodhousii woodhousii Rocky Mountain toad REPTILIA REPTILES Emydidae Box & Basking Turtles *Trachemys scripta elegans red-eared slider Eublepharidae Eyelid Geckos Coleonyx variegatus variegatus desert banded gecko Iguanidae Iguanid Lizards Sauromalus ater common chuckwalla Phrynosomatidae Horned Lizards, Spiny Lizards & Relatives Petrosaurus mearnsi mearnsi Mearn’s rock lizard Sceloporus magister desert spiny lizard Urosaurus graciosus graciosus western long-tailed brush lizard Uta stansburiana elegans western side-blotched lizard Teiidae Whiptails & Racerunners Aspidoscelis tigris tigris Great Basin whiptail Colubridae Harmless Egg-laying Snakes Coluber flagellum piceus red racer Page 2-2 AVES BIRDS Podicipedidae Grebes Podilymbus podiceps pied-billed grebe Podiceps nigricollis eared grebe Pelecanidae Pelicans Pelecanus erythrorhynchos American white pelican Phalacrocoracidae Cormorants Phalacrocorax auritus double-crested cormorant Ardeidae Bitterns and Herons Ardea herodias great blue heron Ardea alba great egret Egretta thula snowy egret Cathartidae American Vultures Cathartes aura turkey vulture Anatidae Swans, Geese, and Ducks Anas americana American wigeon Anas discors blue-winged teal Anas platyrhynchos mallard Anas strepera gadwall Aythya affinis lesser scaup Aythya collaris ring-necked duck Branta canadensis Canada goose Bucephala albeola bufflehead Oxyura jamaicensis ruddy duck Accipitridae Kites, Eagles, Hawks, and Allies †Accipiter cooperii Cooper’s hawk Buteo jamaicensis red-tailed hawk (nesting on adjacent cliffs) Pandion haliaetus osprey Falconidae Caracaras and Falcons †Falco mexicanus prairie falcon Falco sparverius American kestrel Rallidae Rails, Gallinules, and Coots Fulica americana American coot Laridae Skuas, Gulls, Terns, and Skimmers Hydroprogne caspia Caspian tern Larus californicus California gull Page 2-3 Columbidae Pigeons and Doves Zenaida macroura mourning dove (nesting on-site) Cuculidae Cuckoos, Roadrunners, and Anis Geococcyx californianus greater roadrunner Apodidae Swifts Aeronautes saxatalis white-throated swift (nesting on adjacent cliffs) Trochilidae Hummingbirds Calypte anna Anna's hummingbird Calypte costae Costa's hummingbird Alcedinidae Kingfishers Ceryle alcyon belted kingfisher Picidae Woodpeckers and Allies Picoides scalaris ladder-backed woodpecker Tyrannidae Tyrant Flycatchers Sayornis nigricans black phoebe Sayornis saya Say's phoebe Tyrannus verticalis western kingbird Corvidae Crows, Ravens & Jays Corvus corax common raven (nesting on adjacent cliffs) Hirundinidae Swallows Tachycineta thalassina violet-green swallow Stelgidopteryx serripennis northern rough-winged swallow Petrochelidon pyrrhonota cliff swallow (nesting under bridge over Coachella Canal adjacent to site) Remizidae Penduline Tits Auriparus flaviceps verdin (nesting on-site) Troglodytidae Wrens Catherpes mexicanus canyon wren (nesting on adjacent cliffs) Salpinctes obsoletus rock wren Thryomanes bewickii Bewick's wren Regulidae Kinglets Regulus calendula ruby-crowned kinglet Sylviidae Old World Warblers and Gnatcatchers Polioptila caerulea blue-gray gnatcatcher Polioptila melanura black-tailed gnatcatcher (nesting on-site) Page 2-4 Mimidae Mockingbirds, Thrashers, and Allies Mimus polyglottos northern mockingbird (nesting on-site) Sturnidae Starlings and Allies *Sturnus vulgaris European starling Ptilogonatidae Silky-flycatchers Phainopepla nitens phainopepla Parulidae Wood-Warblers Dendroica coronate yellow-rumped warbler Vermivora celata orange-crowned warbler Emberizidae New World Sparrows Melospiza lincolnii Lincoln's sparrow Pipilo aberti Abert's towhee Zonotrichia leucophrys white-crowned sparrow Icteridae Blackbirds and Allies Euphagus cyanocephalus Brewer's blackbird Icterus cucullatus hooded oriole Quiscalus mexicanus great-tailed grackle Fringillidae Cardueline Finches & Allies Carpodacus mexicanus house finch Spinus psaltria lesser goldfinch MAMMALIA MAMMALS Bovidae Sheep and Relatives †Ovis canadensis nelson pop. 2 Peninsular bighorn sheep Canidae Dogs, Foxes, Coyotes and Wolves Canis latrans coyote Cricetidae New World Mice & Rats Neotoma cf. lepida desert woodrat Leporidae Rabbits and Hares Sylvilagus audubonii desert cottontail Squiridae Squirrels and Relatives Otospermophilus beecheyi California ground squirrel Vespertilionidae Evening Bats Parastrellus hesperus western pipistrelle Page 3-1 APPENDIX 3 PHOTOGRAPHIC EXHIBITS Page 3-2 This page intentionally left blank SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project, La Quinta, Riverside County, California Photo 1. Staging fence posts along the alignment. View facing southeast from near tee on hole 5 in the vicinity of northwestern terminus of alignment. Photo 2. Tractor work at the northwestern terminus of the project, where the fence meets the Tradition boundary wall. View facing northwest from adjacent to the fairway at hole 4. SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project, La Quinta, Riverside County, California Photo 3. Installation of fence posts using pneumatic hammer/fence post driver in the vicinity of the northwestern terminus of the alignment. View facing west from adjacent to hole 4. Photo 4. Installed fence post breaks irrigation line along the fairway of hole 5. View facing northwest. SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project, La Quinta, Riverside County, California Photo 5. Transporting and staging rolls of fabric along the alignment using the forklift attachment on the Cat. 2578 compact skip loader. View facing southwest. Photo 6. Hanging fabric using “fence hog” attachment on the Cat. 2578 compact skip loader . View facing south from vicinity of the tee at hole 5. SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project, La Quinta, Riverside County, California Photo 7. Staked boundary of a staked Environmentally Sensitive Area (ESA) located adjacent to an active bird nest (brown colored shrub upper right). The other ESA limit visible in background. View facing south from vicinity of hole 17. Photo 8. One of the active mourning dove nests located in a catclaw acacia along the alignment in the vicinity of the fairway of hole 17. View facing southwest. SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project, La Quinta, Riverside County, California Photo 9. Location of canyon wren nest (small cave) adjacent to alignment in vicinity of the tee at hole 6. View facing south from alignment. Photo 10. Active vermilion flycatcher nest in ornamental white-thorn acacia planted within one of the xeriscaped areas adjacent to the tee at hole 6. SilverRock Resort Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project, La Quinta, Riverside County, California Photo 11. Two adult ewes (one tagged and collared #17) and a lamb ascending slopes adjacent to tee at hole 16. View facing south from alignment. Photo 12. A pair of Peninsular bighorn sheep that approached and foraged along the work area in the vicinity of the fairway of hole 17. View facing south. Page 4-1 APPENDIX 4 FIELD MONITORING FORMS Page 4-2 This page intentionally left blank Page 5-1 APPENDIX 5 WORKER ENVIRONMENTAL AWARENESS PROGRAM Page 5-2 This page intentionally left blank Worker Environmental Awareness Program Peninsular Big Horn Sheep Temporary Fence Installation Project at the SilverRock Resort The Temporary Peninsular Bighorn Sheep Fence Installation Project (Project) at the SilverRock Resort is within the geographic range of, and contains suitable habitat for, a variety of special-status biological resources, including but not limited to: Peninsular bighorn sheep, desert tortoise, red-diamond rattlesnake, rare plant species and nesting bird species protected by the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and California Fish and Game code. SilverRock Resort located in the City of La Quinta, Riverside County California and is located immediately adjacent to the Santa Rosa/San Jacinto Mountains Conservation Area of the Coachella Valley Multiple Species Habitat Conservation Plan and Natural Community Conservation Plan (CVMSHCP/NCCP). The Project is therefore required to comply with the requirements and provisions of the CVMSHCP/NCCP, State and federal Endangered Species Acts, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the City of La Quinta Mitigation Monitoring Program for the SilverRock Resort and the Revised Recommendations for Temporary Fence Installation for the SilverRock Project (USFWS 2017). This Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) was developed to summarize the policies and procedures proposed for the avoidance and/or minimization of potential Project-related impacts to the occurring, or potentially-occurring special-status biological resources. Attendance of the WEAP and signing the acknowledgement form stating that you agree to implement and comply with the Project impact avoidance and minimization measures presented herein, along with all other Project permit conditions and/or Best Management Practices (BMP’s), is a requirement for Project compliance. General Environmental Compliance All Project personnel will comply with the following requirements:  A Worker Environmental Awareness Program (WEAP) will be implemented to inform Project personnel of the potential presence of bighorn sheep along the alignment, on the golf course and/or on the adjacent hillsides. The WEAP will include photographs, descriptions, conservation status, impact avoidance and minimization measures as outlined in this letter, and penalties associated with unauthorized impacts to bighorn sheep. Project personnel will be required to attend the WEAP and sign an acknowledgment of attendance and agreement to comply with the measures outlined in the WEAP. Personnel will be instructed to notify the biological monitor immediately of all sheep sightings, and what to do if a sick or moribund sheep, or a lamb that appears to be abandoned by its mother is observed. In those cases, Project personnel will NOT approach or touch the animal, and will notify the biological monitor immediately. The biological monitor will contact California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) biologist Kevin Brennan (760) 749-3270 – office, (760) 861-3627 – mobile, kevin.brennan@wildlife.ca.gov immediately. La Quinta Animal Control Services should NOT be contacted.  Limit all approved Project-associated activities including fence installation, site access, parking and staging to the Project alignment, designated access routes and staging areas.  Consult the biological monitor to confirm that daily pre-construction clearance surveys have been conducted prior to entry into any new area of the Project site including the fence alignment, access routes, staging areas and/or parking areas. Do not proceed with work in any given area unless you have confirmed that daily pre-construction surveys have been completed.  Observation of a 15-mile per hour (mph) speed limit on all unpaved approved project access routes. Worker Environmental Awareness Procedure BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES  Avoidance of smoking, pets or possession of firearms on-site.  Excavations, pits and/or trenches shall NOT be left open overnight.  Cover, contain, and dispose of trash daily. Construction-related debris should be regularly removed from the site. Do not leave ANY trash, including ALL food scraps and wrappers, on-site. Some birds and mammals can smell, and are attracted to, food waste products (i.e., uneaten scraps, wrappers, utensils, etc.). If you bring it in, pack it out and throw it away. 1.Biological Resources Nesting Birds  The Project site and adjacent areas, or portions thereof, contain potentially suitable habitat for special- status species such as: burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia), prairie falcon (Falco mexicanus), loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus), black-tailed gnatcatcher (Polioptila melanura), vermillion flycatcher (Pyrocephalus rubinus), crissal thrasher (Toxostoma crissale) and Le Conte’s thrasher (Toxostoma lecontei). Burrowing owl, loggerhead shrike, vermillion flycatcher and Crissal thrasher are managed as California Species of Special Concern (SSC’s) while the prairie falcon and black-tailed gnatcatcher are designated as “watch list” species by the CDFW . Le Conte’s thrasher is a covered species under the CVMSHCP/NCCP. The potential for these species to nest on or in proximity to the alignm ent ranges from very low to high. Photos of burrowing owl, loggerhead shrike and vermillion flycatcher are provided below.  While nesting, common native bird species (with few exceptions) are protected by the federal MBTA and California Fish and Game Code and impacts are not covered under the CVMSHCP. Active verdin (Auriparus flaviceps) and mourning dove (Zenaida macroura) nests were observed along the alignment during the pre-construction surveys (conducted on 23 February 17) and the potential for new verdin and mourning dove nests, as well as nests of other common species, along the alignment is high.  A person, association, partnership or corporation which violates the MBTA or its regulations is guilty of a misdemeanor and subject to a fine of up to $500, jail up to six months, or both. Anyone who knowingly takes a migratory bird and intends to, offers to, or actually sells or barters the bird is guilty of a felony, with fines up to $2,000, jail up to two years, or both. Permissible fines have increased significantly under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, as amended in 1987.  The on-site biological monitor will conduct daily pre-construction clearance sweeps in, and ahead of, current work zones including, but not limited to: the alignment, access routes, parking and staging areas during the nesting season (generally February 1 through August 31) prior to daily commencement of Project-related activities in any given area.  Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESA’s) will be established around active bird nests along, and immediately adjacent to, the alignment. Generally, ESA’s for nesting birds are defined by CDFW as 300- feet for passerines or 500-feet for raptors and/or listed species. In some cases, however, ESA’s can be reduced for a variety of reasons including: topography, vegetation, species tolerance, presence of natural or artificial barriers, etc., at the discretion of the biological monitor. ESAs will be clearly marked on the ground with stakes to alert Project personnel to implement Project-specific impact avoidance and/or minimization measures to avoid or reduce Project-related impacts to nesting birds, where appropriate.  The biological monitor will routinely monitor on-site or adjacent bird nests to determine if their status (i.e., active or inactive). When current Project activities that have the potential to affect nesting birds are located in proximity to active bird nests, the biological monitor will observe the birds for potential signs of stress (i.e., excessive scolding, increased activity at the nest site, flushing). If stress behavior is observed, additional impact avoidance and/or minimization measures including, but not limited to: 1) use of hand tools or quieter equipment, 2) adjustment of the alignment (if possible), 3) adjustment of the ESA (where appropriate) and/or 4) installation of temporary sound walls and/or visual barriers.  If a bird nest, or suspected bird nest is observed in the work area, immediately halt work in the immediate vicinity and consult the biological monitor to assess. Do not approach the nest.  Although surveys for burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) conducted for the Project ended with negative results, in the event that burrowing owl(s) are observed or detected on or adjacent to the Project site, ESA’s will be established, staked for avoidance and/or additional measures consistent with those described above will be implemented. Reptiles  The Project site provides habitat and is within the geographic range of red-diamond rattlesnake (Crotalus ruber), which is designated as a SSC by the CDFW. There is a moderate to high potential for this species, along with a variety of other common reptile species to occur on-site.  The biological monitor will conduct a pre-construction clearance sweep for red-diamond rattlesnake and common reptile species prior to daily commencement of Project-related activities in any given area.  Harming, killing, handling or disturbing red-diamond rattlesnake (and other common reptile species) will be avoided by all Project personnel.  Check beneath, in front of and behind vehicles, equipment, Project materials, rocks and/or vegetation prior to starting engines, moving or handling to avoid accidental injury (or worse) to yourself and/or the animal. Visually inspect where you place your hands and plant your feet prior to doing so. Also inspect any and all holes, rock cracks, crevices, trenches, debris, spoils, etc. prior to placing yourself and/or the animal at risk of injury.  Immediately notify the biological monitor if you observe a rattlesnake on-site. Most will voluntarily disperse on their own accord away from people and Project activities. If the animal does not disperse, the biological monitor will have the experience, authorizations and equipment to safely relocate any and all snakes and other common reptile species to suitable habitat away from harm and the Project site.  The federally and state-listed as threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii) is known to occur in the vicinity and the on-site rocky foothills of the Santa Rosa Mountains provide suitable habitat for this species. The likelihood of desert tortoise occurring along the alignment, however, is extremely low. In addition, it is legal and common for residents of California to keep lawfully-acquired desert tortoises as pets. Pet tortoises occasionally escape or are sometimes released. Pet tortoises have the exact same legal status, are protected, and are essentially treated the same as wild tortoises legally. In the unlikely event that a desert tortoise is observed on or adjacent to the Project site, IMMEDIATELY halt ALL work in the area and notify the biological monitor. The biological monitor will notify the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), CDFW and BLM (where applicable) to determine the best course of action. Often, the best approach is allow the tortoise to voluntarily vacate the area. If the animal does not vacate the area voluntarily, however, handling and/or moving the tortoise is NOT AN OPTION without issuance of an incidental take permit. An incidental “take” permit for desert tortoise has NOT been issued for this Project and therefore any/all disturbance to desert tortoise MUST BE AVOIDED. Penalties for unpermitted take of desert tortoise in California include fines of up to $50,000.00, up to one (1) year in jail, or both per incident and per individual/entity. Mammals  A variety of mammals, including but not limited to: mice, gophers, bats, rabbits, squirrels, skunks, possums, raccoons, badgers, coyotes, foxes and bobcats, have the potential of occurring on-site and/or in the immediate vicinity.  The Project alignment, or portions thereof, contains habitat for and is within the geographic range of a variety of special-status mammal species including: western (southern) yellow bat (Lasiurus ega), pocketed free-tailed bat (Nyctinomops femorosaccus), Palm Springs pocket mouse (Perognathus longimembris bangsi), and Coachella Valley (Palm Springs) round-tailed ground squirrel (Spermophilus tereticaudus chlorus).  A pre-construction clearance sweep will be conducted daily by the biological monitor prior to commencement of Project activities. If special-status mammals are detected on-site or in the immediate Worker Environmental Awareness Procedure BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES vicinity, efforts to avoid or minimize Project-related impacts to those species will be implemented to the greatest extent feasible. This may require temporarily halting work in a given area to allow the animal to voluntarily vacate the work area.  Mammals are often found in burrows, dens, under surface objects and within man-made structures such as drainpipes or culverts but can also be found in the shade beneath vehicles and/or equipment. Check beneath vehicles, equipment and materials to avoid harming (or worse) mammals prior to starting engines or moving.  Many mammals are attracted to and will scavenge trash, particularly food-related items, which can be harmful or even fatal for some species. Immediately contain and dispose of trash at the end of each day. Contain and dispose of construction debris (i.e., wood, plastic, metal, cement, concrete, etc.) regularly.  The rocky areas such as the cliffs, outcrops, crevices, cracks and cavities, as well as some of the trees (palm trees with intact aprons in particular) provide day roosting and/or hibernation habitat for a variety of bat species including the western (southern) yellow bat and pocketed free-tailed bat. For these reasons, the Project should avoid and/or minimize disturbance to these microhabitats habitats (where possible).  If/when Project-related disturbance to the above-referenced habitats is necessary, immediately notify the biological monitor to conduct a clearance survey prior to disturbance. If bats are found within an area that requires disturbance, the Coachella Valley Association of Governments (CVAG), CDFW and/or BLM may need to be consulted for further direction.  Because the majority of bat species in our area are insectivorous and lights attract insects, night work should be avoided to prevent accidental or inadvertent harm (or worse) to foraging bat species. Peninsular Bighorn Sheep  Peninsular bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis nelsonii DPS 2) range in color from light brown to grayish or dark brown and have a white rump and lining on the backs of all four legs. Both sexes have horns, large and curved on adult males, or rams and shorter and less curved on juveniles and adult females (ewes).  Peninsular bighorn sheep are residents of the steep, rocky terrain within the adjacent Santa Rosa Mountains and routinely visit the grounds of the golf course at SilverRock Resort, traversing the alignment in the process, hence the purpose of the exclusion of the bighorn sheep from SilverRock Resort and other urban areas within the City that pose hazards.  The Peninsular bighorn sheep is federally-listed as endangered, state-listed as threatened and is a fully- protected species in California. Peninsular bighorn sheep is also a CVMSHCP covered species and the adjacent rocky hillsides are within a CVMSCHP Conservation Area (Santa Rosa/San Jacinto Mountains) and portions of the mountains are designated as critical habitat for this species.  Penalties for unpermitted take of Peninsular bighorn sheep include fines exceeding $100,000 and up to one (1) year in jail, or both per incident and individual/entity.  The Peninsular bighorn sheep population declined from 1,171 to 276 by 1996. By 1998, after their listing, the population increased to around 950.  The City of La Quinta and contractors will work with the involved wildlife agencies (USFWS, CDFW and CVAG) to identify fencing locations, identify timing and phasing of installing fence panels, monitor bighorn sheep during and after the construction. The City will provide adequate biological monitoring staff to redirect sheep out of the work zone if/when necessary.  Prior to commencement of fence installation, representatives of the involved wildlife agencies will walk and finalize the fence alignment, which will be staked at that time, to ensure the alignment is fixed in the field. Gate locations, known sheep access points where fence panels would be installed last, and tie-in alignments to the Tradition wall at the northern terminus and to the exsisting Coachella Valley Water District (CVWD) fence at the southern terminus, will also be identified and marked in the field.  The City should be aware that sheep may be able to access the SilverRock property from the north and south after the temporary fence along the toe-of-slope is built, so additional temporary fencing to exclude sheep may be necessary.  The final design and alignment selection will identify locations for entry gates that provide access necessary so that biologists can redirect bighorn sheep away from the golf-course and to the natural, steep mountainous side of the fence if/when necessary. In addition, as the fencing is installed it may be necessary to provide openings sufficient to allow the sheep access to escape terrain from the golf course.  Biological monitoring by a qualified biologist knowledgeable in bighorn sheep biology will be conducted for all construction-related activities that have the potential to affect bighorn sheep. The biological monitor will be on-site at all times during construction to observe sheep presence in or near the construction area, document any signs of distrees or illness, and take appropriate action if needed. Pre-construction clearance sweeps will be conducted prior to commencment of daily Project-related activites and fence construction will be monitored at all times by the on-site biological monitor.  The biological monitor will have the authority to temporarily halt any and all construction-related activities that threaten Peninsular bighorn sheep and to contact the involved wildlife agencies (CDFW biologist Kevin Brennan [760] 749-3270 – office, [760] 861-3627 – mobile; kevin.brennan@wildlife.ca.gov and/or USFWS biologist Jenness McBride [760] 322-2070 ext. 403; jenness_mcbride@fws.gov) if sheep are encountered during fence installation.  Impact avoidance and/or minimization measures that may be implemented by the on-site biological monitor include: daily monitoring of the fence alignment, construction areas, and the SilverRock golf course adjacent to the alignment. The biological monitor will remain on-site every day during all construction activities, and provide daily reports to designated wildlife agencies staff.  Physical capture, temporary handling, and immediate relocation of bighorn sheep (if necessary) will be conducted only by CDFW biologist, Kevin Brennan (760) 749-3270 – office, (760) 861-3627 – mobile.  To protect Peninsular bighorn sheep, the provisions required by the Mountain Toe‐of‐Slope Buffer/Mitigation Concept Plan for the SiverRock Resort and/or more current overseeing agency (CVAG, USFWS, CDFW, BLM) requirements (i.e., USFWS Revised Recommendations for Temporary Fence Installation for SilverRock Project letter dated January 18, 2017).  Development and design (including but not limited to: location, height, spacing width, materials) of the fence shall be in accordance with the City of La Quinta Mitigation Monitoring Program for the SilverRock Resort or current overseeing agency (CVAG, USFWS and/or CDFW ) requirements. Plants  The Project site, or portions thereof, provides potentially suitable habitat for a variety of special-status plant species including: chaparral sand-verbena (Abronia villosa var. Aurita), Borrego milkvetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. borreganus), Coachella Valley milkvetch (Astragalus lentiginosus var. coachellae), triple-ribbed milkvetch (Astragalus tricarinatus), white-bracted spineflower (Chorizanthe xanti var. leucotheca), ribbed cryptantha (Cryptantha costata), winged cryptantha (Cryptantha holoptera), glandular ditaxis (Ditaxis clariana), California ditaxis (Ditaxis serrata var. califórnica), Deep Canyon snapdragon (Pseudorontium cyathiferum) and Orocopia sage (Salvia greatae). The potential for these species to occur along the alignment is considered to be very low to low.  Several of these are CVMSHCP-covered species. These include the federally-listed as endangered Coachella valley milkvetch federally-listed as endangered triple-ribbed milkvetch and Orocopia sage.  Pre-construction clearance sweeps will be conducted daily by the on-site biological monitor prior to commencement of Project activities in any given area. If special-status plant species are detected, efforts to avoid or minimize Project-related impacts to those species will be implemented to the greatest extent feasible. This may include: 1) adjustment from the proposed alignment to physically avoid the species and/or transplantation. Worker Environmental Awareness Procedure BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES  The biological monitor will establish ESAs for special-status plant species where observed. ESAs will implemented to avoid and/or minimize disturbance to special-status plant species to the greatest extent practicable. Reporting  The biological monitor will record any bighorn sheep encounters that occurred and how they were resolved on a daily basis. For the first week of construction, the biological monitor will report daily by 6:00 PM to the CDFW and USFWS by email or telephone, and weekly (each Friday) thereafter. Points of contact for the Wildlife Agencies are: Jenness McBride, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: 760- 322-2070, extension 403; jenness_mcbride@fws.gov; and Kevin Brennan, California Department of Fish and Wildlife: (760) 749-3270 – office, (760) 861-3627 – mobile; Kevin.Brennan@wildlife.ca.gov  Post-construction monitoring will be conducted at least once daily after the fence is completed for the presence of bighorn sheep on either side of the fence or anywhere on the SilverRock property, with weekly reports provided to the wildlife agencies by email or telephone to the points of contact noted above. Post- construction monitoring should continue for about 2 or 3 months. Based on the monitoring results, the wildlife agencies in coordination with SilverRock management will evaluate the need for further monitoring. This post-construction monitoring does not require special qualifications; any employee of SilverRock or the City of La Quinta, for example golf course maintenance workers, would be able to act as observers during their normal work hours, with minimal training on what to observe and record. The Wildlife Agencies would be glad to work with the City of La Quinta and SilverRock to brief personnel on how to observe sheep without disturbing them and to report on any sheep sightings.  All daily and post-construction reports will be assembled and maintained as a part of the Project record, and provided to the Wildlife Agencies. Literature Cited Colby, J., and R. Botta. 2014. Peninsular bighorn sheep annual report 2014. California Department of Fish and Wildlife, South Coast Region. United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), 2017. Revised Recommendations for Temporary Fence Installation for SilverRock Project, City of La Quinta, Riverside County, California. Unpublished letter submitted by the USFWS to La Quinta City Manager, Mr. Frank J. Spevacek on January 18, 2017. Contacts Amec Foster Wheeler Biological Monitors: Michael Wilcox, Office: (951) 369-8060 Mobile: (951) 634-9765 E-mail: michael.wilcox@amecfw.com Nathan Moorhatch, Office: (951) 369-8060 Mobile: (714) 423-8559 E-mail: nathan.moorhatch@amecfw.com Biological Resources Manager: Scott Crawford, Office: (951) 369-8060 ext. 223 Mobile: (714) 742-5316 E-mail: scott.crawford@amecfw.com California Department of Fish and Wildlife Biologist: Kevin Brennan, (760) 749-3270 – office; (760) 861-3627 - Mobile E-mail: kevin.brennan@wildlife.ca.gov United States Fish and Wildlife Service Biologist: Jenness McBride, Office: (760) 322-2070 ext. 403 E-mail: jenness.mcbride@fws.gov Page6-1 APPENDIX 6 WEAP RECORD OF ATTENDANCE Page6-2 This page intentionally left blank